Datasets:

wckwan

/

M4LE

like 3

Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.

Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered . Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video . Paper: the statistical mechanics of two polymers with constraints on their winding angle has been extensively studied in order to understand the behavior of physical polymer systems , like for instance biological macromolecules of dna @xcite or liquid crystals composed of stacks of disk - shaped molecules @xcite , see refs . a detailed review on the subject , together with interesting proposals of how to include in the treatment of topologically entangled polymer link invariants which are more sophisticated than the winding number , can be found in @xcite . up to now , however , despite many efforts , mainly ideal polymer chains or loops winding around each others have been considered , while the repulsive interactions between the monomers have been treated approximatively or exploiting in a clever way scaling arguments integrated by numerical simulations , as for instance in @xcite . here we concentrate ourselves on the case of two directed polymers interacting via a repulsive dirac @xmath0function potential @xcite . we are particularly interested in the average degree of entanglement of the system , which we wish to estimate by computing the square average winding angle of the two polymers . this quantity is also called second moment of the winding angle or simply second moment and is a special example of the topological moments first introduced in ref . @xcite . to achieve our goals , we develop an approach , which combines quantum mechanical and field theoretical techniques . with respect to previous works , we are able to obtain exact results even if the repulsive interactions are not switched off . in principle , the average of any observable like the squared winding angle can be derived once the partition function of the system is known , but in our case it turns out that the partition function is simply too complicated to obtain any analytical result . this happens essentially because the full @xmath0function potential is not a central potential , since it mixes both radial and angular variables . for this reason , the usual procedure of going to polar coordinates and then solving the differential equation satisfied by the partition function of the entangled polymers with the method of separation of variables @xcite , does no longer produce simple formulas as in the situations in which only central forces are present . to avoid these difficulties , one possibility is to approximate the @xmath0function potential with some radial potential , like for instance the hard core potential of ref . however , here we shall adopt a different strategy , based on field theories , which does not require any approximation . this strategy has been developed in @xcite ( see also ref . @xcite for more details ) to cope with ideal closed polymers whose trajectories are concatenated . also such systems are characterized by a non - central potential , which comes out as a consequence of the topological constraints imposed on the trajectories . in the field theoretical formulation of refs . @xcite the computation of the second moment is reduced to the problem of computing some correlation functions of a field theory . a bonus is provided by the fact that this computation requires just a finite number of feynman diagrams to be evaluated . in the present case , due to the presence of the @xmath0function potential , the field theory which we obtain is no longer free as that of refs . nevertheless , we will see that the theory is still linear and thus it can be exactly solved once its propagator is known . luckily , this propagator may be computed exactly using powerful non - perturbative techniques developed in the context of quantum mechanics to deal with hamiltonian containing @xmath0function potentials , see refs . basically , starting from the green function of a particle whose dynamics is governed by a given hamiltonian @xmath1 , these techniques provide an algorithm to construct the green function of a particle corresponding to a _ perturbed _ hamiltonian @xmath2 , where @xmath3 is the @xmath0function potential . one advantage of these methods is that there is a long list of potentials for which the green functions of the unperturbed hamiltonians @xmath4 are known . in this way , it is easy to generalize our treatment including new interactions , which could be relevant in polymer physics , like for instance the coulomb interaction . the price to be paid is that the quantum - mechanical algorithm works when the green functions are expressed as functions of the energy instead of the time . in the polymer analogy , assuming that the ends of the polymers are attached to two planar surfaces perpendicular to the @xmath5axis and located at the positions @xmath6 and @xmath7 , the role of time is played by the distance @xmath8 , while the energy corresponds to the chemical potential conjugated @xmath8 . to recover the original dependence on @xmath8 , one needs to calculate an inverse laplace transform of the field propagator with respect to the energy . in general , this is not a simple task . once the propagator of the linear field theory is known , the correlation functions which enter in the expression of the second moment may be calculated contracting the fields in all possible ways using the wick prescription . at the end , we get in this way an exact formula of the second moment as a function of the _ energy _ , which , we remember , has here the meaning of the chemical potential conjugated to the distance @xmath8 . in the @xmath8 space , due to the problems of computing the inverse laplace transform of the propagator mentioned above , only an approximated expression of the second moment will be given in the limit of large values of @xmath8 and assuming that the strength of the @xmath0function potential is weak enough to allow a perturbative approach . our results allow both a qualitative and quantitative understanding of the way in which the repulsive interactions affect the entanglement of two directed polymers . the corrections introduced by these interactions in the expression of the second moment of ideal polymers have been studied in some interesting limits . first of all , it has been examined the limit of long polymer trajectories , in which we show that repulsive interaction become particularly relevant . moreover , we have investigated also the perturbative regime and the strong coupling limit , which is important to recover the excluded volume interactions . while it is not a problem to take the strong coupling limit within our exact treatment of the repulsive interactions , it turns out that , in this case , the expression of the second moment is particularly complicated from the analytical point of view . for this reason , in the conclusions we will discuss the application of a powerful perturbative method to study field theories at strong coupling due to kleinert @xcite . finally , the consistency of our results with the previous ones has been checked by studying the limit of ideal polymers . the material presented in this paper is divided as follows . in the next section , the problem of computing the second moment of the winding angle of two directed polymers interacting via a @xmath0function potential is briefly illustrated using the path integral approach . a constraint on the winding angle is imposed by coupling the trajectories of the polymers with a suitable external magnetic field , following the strategy of previous works like for instance @xcite . in section [ sec : three ] the second moment is expressed in the form of a finite sum of amplitudes of a linear field theory . these amplitudes may be computed once the propagator of the theory is constructed . in our case , the propagator coincides with the green function of a particle diffusing in a @xmath0function potential . the derivation of this green function in the energy representation using non - perturbative techniques developed in the context of quantum mechanics @xcite is the subject of section [ sec : four ] . the @xmath0function potential is responsible of the appearance of singularities in the propagator at short distances , which have been regulated here with the introduction of a cut - off . this procedure is motivated by the fact that in polymer physics there is no point in considering distances which are smaller than the dimensions of a monomer . a comparison with the more rigorous method of renormalization is made , showing the consistency of the two procedures . the propagator derived in section ( [ sec : four ] ) has a particularly nice form , in which the contributions coming from the repulsive forces can be separated from the free part of the propagator , which is related to the random walk of ideal polymers . this splitting of the propagator is used in section [ sec : five ] to discuss qualitatively and qualitatively the effects of the @xmath0function interactions on the entanglement of the system . the results of sections [ sec : three ] and [ sec : four ] provide in principle all the ingredients of the second moment . however , the amplitudes of the linear field theory derived in section [ sec : three ] should still be evaluated . in this task one encounters the typical problems occurring in the evaluation of the analytical expressions of feynman diagrams . in the case of the second moment there are just tree diagrams , but still one has to perform complicated integrations over the spatial coordinates which are transverse to the @xmath5axis . even assuming that polymers are ideal , the analytical evaluation of these integrations requires drastic approximations , see for instance @xcite . to avoid these difficulties , we average the second moment with respect to the positions of the endpoints of the two polymers . this averaged version of the second moment can be computed without any approximation in the energy representation . this is done in section [ sec : six ] . the expression of the averaged second moment in the @xmath9space is provided instead only at the first perturbative order in the strength of the repulsive potential and assuming additionally that the value of @xmath8 is large . we give also an exact formula of the second moment without performing any averaging procedure as a function of @xmath8 . this formula is however explicit only up to the calculation of the inverse laplace transform of the propagator derived in section [ sec : four ] . in section [ sec : seven ] we consider the situation in which the polymers are not interacting in order to allow the comparison with previous results . finally , the discussion of the obtained results and ideas for further developments are presented in the conclusions . our starting point is the action of two directed polymers @xmath10 and @xmath11 : @xmath12 \label{actnorm}\ ] ] where @xmath13 is the potential : @xmath14 the sign of @xmath15 has been chosen in such a way that the interaction associated to the potential @xmath16 is repulsive . the parameters @xmath17 and @xmath8 determine the average length of the trajectories of the polymers . the ends of the polymers are supposed to be fixed on two surfaces perpendicular to the @xmath5axis and located at the heights @xmath6 and @xmath7 . both polymers have a preferred direction along the @xmath18 direction . the vectors @xmath19 and @xmath20 , @xmath21 , measure the polymer displacement along the remaining two directions of the space . the action of eq . ( [ actnorm ] ) resembles that of two quantum particles in the case of imaginary time @xmath18 . to stress these analogies with quantum mechanics , the @xmath5variable will be treated as a pseudo - time and renamed using from now on the letter @xmath22 instead of @xmath18 . in the system of the center of mass : @xmath23 the action ( [ actnorm ] ) becomes : @xmath24 \label{cmact}\ ] ] the motion of the center of mass , which is a free motion described by the coordinate @xmath25 , will be ignored . we consider the partition function of the above two - polymer system with the addition of a constraint on the entanglement of the trajectories : @xmath26 } \delta(m-\chi ) \label{totparfun}\ ] ] @xmath27 is the so - called winding angle . its expression is given by : @xmath28 where @xmath29 is a vector potential with components : @xmath30 in the above equation we have represented the vector @xmath31 using cartesian coordinates @xmath32 . i. e. @xmath33 . moreover , from now on , middle latin indices @xmath34 will label the directions which are perpendicular to the @xmath35axis . the definition of the partition function @xmath36 is completed by the boundary conditions at @xmath37 and @xmath38 : @xmath39 the quantity in eq . ( [ wnum ] ) becomes a topological invariant if the polymer trajectories are closed . in the present case , in which the trajectories are open , @xmath27 just counts the angle with which one polymer winds up around the other . thus , the partition function @xmath36 gives the formation probability of polymer paths winding up of an angle @xmath40 exploiting the fourier representation of dirac @xmath0functions @xmath41 eq . ( [ totparfun ] ) can be rewritten as follows : @xmath42 where @xmath43 the lagrangian @xmath44 is that of a particle immersed in the magnetic potential associated to the vector field ( [ vecpot ] ) : @xmath45 the fourier transformed partition function @xmath46 is the grand canonical version of the original partition function @xmath36 , in which the number @xmath47 is allowed to take any possible value . @xmath46 coincides with the propagator @xmath48 , which satisfies the following pseudo - schrdinger equation : @xmath49{\cal g}_\lambda(l;{{\mbox{\bf r}}}_1,{{\mbox{\bf r}}}_0 ) = 0 \label{pseudseq}\ ] ] @xmath50 is the hamiltonian of the system , computed starting from the lagrangian ( [ newaction ] ) : @xmath51 eq . ( [ pseudseq ] ) is completed by the boundary condition at @xmath52 : @xmath53 the average degree of entanglement of the two polymers can be estimated computing the topological moments of the winding angle @xmath54 , @xmath55 @xcite . once the partition function is known , the @xmath54 may be expressed as follows : @xmath56 the quantities @xmath54 depend on the boundary conditions @xmath57 and , of course , on the parameters @xmath17 and @xmath8 . for practical reasons , we will also consider the following _ averaged _ topological moments : @xmath58 as eq . ( [ aderr ] ) shows , the average is performed with respect to the relative positions @xmath57 of the endpoints . this is equivalent to an average over the positions of the endpoints @xmath59 at the instants @xmath37 and @xmath38 , because the coordinates of the center of mass have been factored out from the partition function and thus they do not play any role . the advantage of the averaged topological moments is that , a posteriori , it will be seen that their computation is easier than that of the topological moments given in eq . ( [ sectopmomdef ] ) . from the physical point of view , the averaged topological moments measure the entanglement of two polymers , whose ends at the instants @xmath37 and @xmath38 are free to move . here we will be interested only in the second moment @xmath60 and in the averaged second moment @xmath61 , i. e. in the case @xmath62 of eqs . ( [ sectopmomdef ] ) and ( [ aderr ] ) . the second moment is in fact enough in order to estimate the formation probability of entanglement with a given winding angle and to determine how the winding angle grows with increasing polymer lengths . in the following it will be useful to work in the so - called energy representation , i. .e considering the laplace transformed of the partition function @xmath48 with respect to @xmath8 : @xmath63 the new partition function @xmath64 describes the probability of two entangled polymers of any length subjected to the condition that the relative positions of the polymer end at the initial and final instants @xmath65 and @xmath66 are given by the vectors @xmath67 and @xmath68 . with respect to the formulation in the @xmath9 space , however , the distance @xmath69 is no longer exactly equal to @xmath8 , but is allowed to vary according to a distribution which is governed by the boltzmann - like factor @xmath70 . thus , @xmath71 plays the role of the chemical potential conjugated to the end - to - end distance of the polymer trajectories in the @xmath35direction . it is worth to remember that , roughly speaking , small values of @xmath71 correspond to large values of @xmath8 , while large values of @xmath71 correspond to small values of @xmath8 . starting from eq . ( [ pseudseq ] ) and recalling the boundary conditions ( [ bbdc ] ) , it is easy to check that @xmath64 satisfies the stationary pseudo - schrdinger equation : @xmath72{\cal g}_\lambda(e;{{\mbox{\bf r}}}_1,{{\mbox{\bf r}}}_0)=\delta({{\mbox{\bf r}}}_1-{{\mbox{\bf r}}}_0 ) \label{pseenerep}\ ] ] where @xmath50 is always the hamiltonian of eq . ( [ ham ] ) . in this section we wish to evaluate the expression of the second moment as a function of the energy @xmath71 using a field theoretical formulation of the polymer partition function . the starting point is provided by the formula of the second moment in the @xmath9space suitably rewritten in the following way : @xmath73 for consistency with eq . ( [ sectopmomdef ] ) , the numerator @xmath74 and the denominator @xmath75 appearing in eq . ( [ secmomnumden ] ) must be of the form : @xmath76 and @xmath77 using eq . ( [ laplrep ] ) , it is now straightforward to compute the laplace transform of @xmath74 and @xmath75 : @xmath78 @xmath79 once the functions @xmath80 and @xmath81 are known , one can construct the ratio : @xmath82 which is nothing but the second moment of the winding angle expressed as a function of the chemical potential @xmath71 . we remark that the green function @xmath64 is related to the feynman propagator of the spin@xmath83 aharonov - bohm problem in quantum mechanics . in principle , this green function can be computed exactly starting from eq . ( [ pseenerep ] ) @xcite , but its final expression is too complicated for our purposes . moreover , the method used in @xcite to renormalize the singularities coming from the presence of the @xmath0function potential is valid only in a restricted region of the domain of @xmath84 . this is incompatible with our requirements , because , to derive the second moment , one has to integrate @xmath64 with respect to @xmath84 over the whole real line . for this reason , we prefer here to use a field theoretical representation of this green function . this is achieved by noting that @xmath85 coincides with the inverse matrix element of the operator @xmath86 : @xmath87 and may be expressed in a functional integral form in terms of replica fields : @xmath88 in the above equation @xmath89 are multiplets of replica fields : @xmath90 with action @xmath91\psi \label{erepact}\ ] ] the symbol @xmath92 in eq . ( [ ftrep ] ) denotes summation over the replica index . for example @xmath93 . below it will be used also the convention @xmath94 . the details of the derivation of eq . ( [ ftrep ] ) can be found in previous publications on the subject @xcite and will not be provided here . in order to proceed , it will be convenient to expand the action ( [ erepact ] ) in powers of @xmath84 : @xmath95 where we have put : @xmath96 \label{szero}\ ] ] @xmath97 \label{sone}\ ] ] @xmath98 at this point we come back to the computation of the quantities @xmath80 and @xmath81 appearing in the expression of the second moment . exploiting the new form of the partition function given by eqs . ( [ ftrep][stwo ] ) , together with the relation @xmath99 and the fact that @xmath100 , it is possible to rewrite eqs . ( [ momno ] ) and ( [ momnt ] ) as follows : @xmath101e^{-s_0(\psi^*,\psi ) } \label{nsdo}\ ] ] @xmath102 the right hand sides of eqs . ( [ nsdo ] ) and ( [ nsdt ] ) represent vacuum expectation values of a field theory governed by the action @xmath103 of eq . ( [ szero ] ) . in the formulation in terms of quantum operators we have : @xmath104 @xmath105 the correlation functions have a subscript @xmath106 to remember that , according to the replica method , they should be computed first assuming that the number of replicas @xmath106 is an arbitrary positive integer and then taking the limit for @xmath106 going to zero . the above correlators may be evaluated using standard field theoretical methods . one could be tempted to use a perturbative approach assuming that the value of @xmath15 appearing in the action @xmath103 of eqs . ( [ nsdo ] ) and ( [ nsdt ] ) is small , but this is not necessary . as a matter of fact , if it is true that @xmath103 does not describe free fields because of the presence of the @xmath0function potential , it is also true that it is just quadratic in the fields . as a consequence , one is allowed to define a propagator @xmath107 associated with this action . it is easy to check that @xmath107 satisfies the equation : @xmath108g(e;{{\mbox{\bf x}}},{{\mbox{\bf y}}})=\delta({{\mbox{\bf x}}},{{\mbox{\bf y } } } ) \label{fdfjh}\ ] ] using the above propagator , one can evaluate the amplitudes in eqs . ( [ nsdoqop ] ) and ( [ nsdtqop ] ) exactly by contracting the fields in all possible ways according to the wick theorem . after straightforward calculations , one finds : @xmath109 @xmath110 @xmath111 where @xmath112\label{amptwoone}\\ i_2({{\mbox{\bf r}}}_1,{{\mbox{\bf r}}}_0 ) & = & + \frac1{2c^2}\int d^2xd^2y\left [ a_i({{\mbox{\bf x}}})(\nabla_{\mathbf x}^ig(e;{{\mbox{\bf x}}},{{\mbox{\bf r}}}_1))g(e;{{\mbox{\bf y}}},{{\mbox{\bf x } } } ) a_j({{\mbox{\bf y}}})(\nabla_{\mathbf y}^jg(e;{{\mbox{\bf r}}}_0,{{\mbox{\bf y}}}))\right]\label{amptwotwo}\\ i_3({{\mbox{\bf r}}}_1,{{\mbox{\bf r}}}_0)&= & + \frac1{2c^2}\int d^2xd^2y\left [ a_i({{\mbox{\bf x}}})g(e;{{\mbox{\bf r}}}_0,{{\mbox{\bf x}}})(\nabla_{\mathbf x}^i \nabla_{\mathbf y}^jg(e;{{\mbox{\bf x}}},{{\mbox{\bf y}}}))a_j({{\mbox{\bf y}}})g(e;{{\mbox{\bf y}}},{{\mbox{\bf r}}}_1)\right]\label{amptwothree}\\ i_4({{\mbox{\bf r}}}_1,{{\mbox{\bf r}}}_0 ) & = & -\frac1{2c^2}\int d^2xd^2y \left [ a_i({{\mbox{\bf x}}})g(e;{{\mbox{\bf r}}}_0,{{\mbox{\bf x}}})(\nabla_{\mathbf x}^ig(e;{{\mbox{\bf x}}},{{\mbox{\bf y } } } ) ) a_j({{\mbox{\bf y}}})(\nabla_{\mathbf y}^jg(e;{{\mbox{\bf y}}},{{\mbox{\bf r}}}_1))\right]\label{amptwofour}\end{aligned}\ ] ] from the physical point of view , the above equations may be interpreted in the following way . the fields @xmath113 and @xmath114 contain operators which , inside each replica sector , create and annihilate segments of the two polymers , whose relative positions are given by the vector @xmath115 . the two polymer system has been projected in the two - dimensional plane perpendicular to the @xmath35axis . for this reason , there appear only the transverse coordinates @xmath115 . the only remnant of the third dimension is the dependence on the energy @xmath71 . the correlation functions ( [ ampone ] ) and ( [ amptwo ] ) describe the fluctuations of the two polymers immersed in the @xmath0function potential and subjected to the interactions represented by the vector potential ( [ vecpot ] ) . we recall that the origin of the latter interactions is the presence of the constraint on the winding angle in the partition function ( [ totparfun ] ) . to evaluate the correlation functions ( [ ampone ] ) and ( [ amptwo ] ) , one needs to consider only a finite number of feynman diagrams , corresponding to the relevant processes with which the two polymers interact together . the result , after the analytical evaluation of these diagrams , is provided by eqs . ( [ amptwoone][amptwofour ] ) . let us note that in these equations the repulsive interactions due to the @xmath0function potential are hidden in the propagators @xmath107 . the feynman diagrams related to the amplitudes of eqs . ( [ amptwoone])([amptwofour ] ) are all topologically equivalent to the diagram of fig . [ processone ] . ) ([amptwofour ] ) . the two polymers @xmath10 and @xmath11 start at a distance @xmath116 from each other and interact twice with the the external field @xmath117 . at the end , the relative position of the end points at the instant @xmath38 is given by @xmath68 . the three - vertices appearing in the figure are related to the interaction described by eq . ( [ sone ] ) . , title="fig : " ] + the amplitude of eq . ( [ amponek ] ) is related instead to the feynman diagram of fig . [ processtwo ] . ) . the two polymers @xmath10 and @xmath11 start at a distance @xmath116 from each other and interact with the the external field @xmath117 . at the final instant @xmath38 , the relative position of the end points is given by @xmath68 . the four - vertex appearing in this figure is related to the interaction described by eq . ( [ stwo ] ) . , title="fig : " ] + the vectors @xmath118 and @xmath119 denote the relative positions of the end points of the two polymers at the initial and final instants , as already mentioned . the integration variables @xmath120 and @xmath121 appearing in eqs . ( [ amponek][amptwofour ] ) may be regarded as the vectors which give the relative positions of the trajectories of the two polymers at the instants in which they interact together via the external vector potential @xmath122 of eq . ( [ vecpot ] ) . there is no restriction on the domain of integration of @xmath120 and @xmath121 , so that the components of these relative vectors are allowed to take any value . this implies that the distance between the polymer segments when the interaction with @xmath122 occurs can be arbitrarily large . now that the correlation functions which are present in the expressions of @xmath123 and @xmath124 given in eqs . ( [ nsdoqop ] ) and ( [ nsdtqop ] ) have been evaluated , see eqs . ( [ amponek][amptwofour ] ) , we may put everything together and give to the second moment of eq . ( [ secmomerep ] ) a more explicit form : @xmath125 in conclusion , the initial problem of computing the second moment of the winding angle @xmath60 has been reduced to the evaluation of a finite number of integrals , which are given in eqs . ( [ amponek][amptwofour ] ) . of course , to make these integrals really explicit , we still need to derive the propagator @xmath107 , which is so far the only missing ingredient . this will be done in the next section . let @xmath126 be the solution of the differential equation : @xmath127 for a given hamiltonian @xmath4 . when @xmath52 , @xmath126 satisfies the boundary condition : @xmath128 in the case of a hamiltonian @xmath50 , obtained by adding to @xmath1 a @xmath0function potential as a perturbation : @xmath129 we consider the analogous differential problem : @xmath130 @xmath131 we wish to compute @xmath132 starting from the green function @xmath126 , which is supposed to be known . it is possible to show that @xmath132 and @xmath126 are related by the integral equation @xcite : @xmath133 we see that in the right hand side of the above equation the presence of the @xmath0function forces us to consider the functions @xmath126 and @xmath132 evaluated at the points @xmath134 and/or @xmath135 . usually , at these points green functions may be not well defined due to the presence of singularities . a concrete procedure to remove these singularities will be indicated later . for the moment , we go further with formal manipulations , assuming that some kind of consistent regularization of the possible divergences has been introduced . first of all , we perform the integration over @xmath136 in eq . ( [ gkk ] ) : @xmath137 the integral in @xmath138 appearing in the right hand side of eq . ( [ beflap ] ) is a convolution which can be better treated after a laplace transform . thus , we transform both sides of this equation with respect to @xmath8 : @xmath139 where @xmath140 and @xmath141 at this point , it is easy to extract from eq . ( [ lapltragf ] ) the expression of @xmath107 : @xmath142 the above formula may be used in order to solve eq . ( [ fdfjh ] ) . in this case , @xmath4 coincides with the free action : @xmath143 and the function @xmath144 is given by : @xmath145 here @xmath146 denotes the modified bessel function of the second kind of order zero . clearly , we can not apply directly eq . ( [ finald ] ) without introducing a regularization . as a matter of fact , if not treated , the naive denominator in the second term of the right hand side is equal to infinity , i. e. @xmath147 . this is due to the fact that @xmath146 diverges logarithmically in the limit @xmath148 : @xmath149 a natural regularization is suggested by the fact that , in polymer physics , it has no sense to consider lengths which are smaller than the size of the molecules which compose the polymers . thus , it seems reasonable to regulate ultraviolet divergences by introducing a cut - off @xmath150 at short distances . the length @xmath150 is comparable with the molecular size . according to this prescription , by inserting the green function of eq . ( [ gzspec ] ) in eq . ( [ finald ] ) , we obtain : @xmath151 the symbol @xmath152 means that the quantity in the left hand side of an equation has been replaced in the right hand side with its regulated version . the above green function is what we need in order to evaluate explicitly the amplitudes of eqs . ( [ ampzero][amptwo ] ) . the infinities coming from the @xmath0function potential should be treated with some care in order to avoid ambiguities . for this reason , we would like to compare the naive prescription used here to derive eq . ( [ gffin ] ) with the more rigorous procedure of renormalization . it is known in fact that the renormalization of the infinities coming from @xmath0function interactions produces physically sensible results @xcite . the divergences will be regulated introducing a cut - off @xmath153 in the momentum space . as a consequence , it will be convenient to express the free green function of eq . ( [ gzspec ] ) in momentum space . to this purpose , we use the following formula : @xmath154 to evaluate the green function at the singular point @xmath155 we need to compute the following divergent integral : @xmath156 using the above cut - off prescription to eliminate the ultraviolet singularities we get , in the assumption @xmath157 : @xmath158 now , according to the spirit of renormalization , we subtract the infinities from the bare parameters of the theory . in our case , after choosing an arbitrary mass scale @xmath159 , which gives the renormalization point , we renormalize the bare coupling constant @xmath15 . actually , it will be better to call it @xmath160 instead of @xmath15 in order to distinguish it from the effective coupling constant @xmath15 appearing in eq . ( [ gffin ] ) . the subtraction of infinities is performed in such a way that the quantity : @xmath161 becomes finite . we choose a sort of minimal subtraction scheme , in which the renormalized coupling constant @xmath162 is related to the bare coupling constant @xmath160 as follows : @xmath163 applying the last two above equations back to eq . ( [ finald ] ) , we get as a result : @xmath164 eqs . ( [ gffin ] ) and ( [ gffinren ] ) are reciprocally compatible . in fact , since @xmath150 is very small , because it is the smallest possible length scale in our polymer problem , one can use the following approximation ( see eq . ( [ fdsf ] ) ) in the denominator of the second term of eq . ( [ gffin ] ) : @xmath165 comparing with the analogous denominator in eq . ( [ gffinren ] ) , it is possible to relate @xmath150 with the inverse of the mass @xmath159 : @xmath166 moreover , the effective coupling constant @xmath15 of eq . ( [ gffin ] ) may be identified with the renormalized coupling constant @xmath162 , which gives the strength of the repulsive interaction ( [ dirpot ] ) at distance scales of order @xmath150 . before concluding this section , we make a small digression about the translational invariance of the free hamiltonian ( [ freeham ] ) and consequently of the free green function ( [ gzspec ] ) . clearly , this is not the same translational invariance that was already present in the original action ( [ actnorm ] ) due to the translational invariance of the potential ( [ dirpot ] ) . this new invariance is rather related to the fact that the physics of the two polymer system in the absence of any interaction does not change if we modify the relative positions of the polymer ends at @xmath37 and @xmath38 in a symmetric way . an example of such transformations is the translation of both ends of polymer @xmath10 at the initial and final points by a constant vector @xmath167 : @xmath168 as a result of the translations ( [ strazerexone][straelexone ] ) , the relative vector @xmath169 of eq . ( [ cmcoor ] ) at the instants @xmath37 and @xmath38 changes as follows : @xmath170 clearly the propagator ( [ gzspec ] ) is invariant under the above transformations . this kind of invariance can be explained as follows . as far as the two polymers @xmath10 and @xmath11 do not interact , each of them may be treated as an independent system . if we translate for instance both ends of polymer @xmath10 at @xmath37 and @xmath38 in the symmetrical way shown by eqs . ( [ strazerexone ] ) and ( [ straelexone ] ) , the number of configurations of polymer @xmath10 and consequently the configurational entropy of the whole system do not change , because the transformation is equivalent to a translation of polymer @xmath10 in the space . of course , this invariance disappears as soon as the two polymers start to interact or if they are entangled together . indeed , if one adds to the free hamiltonian ( [ freeham ] ) a @xmath0function potential , the propagator stops to be translational invariant as shown by the green function of eq . ( [ finald ] ) , which does not depend on the difference @xmath171 . in principle we have at this point all the ingredients which are necessary to compute the second moment of eq . ( [ secmomerep ] ) . in eqs . ( [ nsdoqop ] ) and ( [ nsdtqop ] ) , in fact , the quantities @xmath80 and @xmath81 are written as linear combinations of the amplitudes of eqs . ( [ ampzero][amptwo ] ) , which can be explicitly evaluated using the propagator @xmath172 given in eq . ( [ gffin ] ) appearing in the definition of the propagator of eq . ( [ gffin ] ) are replaced by the vectors @xmath173 . this is to avoid confusions with the notation of eqs . ( [ amponek][amptwofour ] ) , where the same pair of vectors @xmath174 has been exploited to denote dummy integration variables . ] and the formulas of eqs . ( [ amponek][amptwofour ] ) . the remaining task is to perform the integrations over the coordinates @xmath115 and @xmath175 in eqs . ( [ amponek][amptwofour ] ) . from the analytical point of view , the evaluation of these integrals poses severe technical problems , which can be solved only with the help of drastic approximations . however , the difficulties become milder if we average the second moment over the endpoints of the polymers as shown in eq . ( [ aderr ] ) . in the energy representation , which we are using , this means that we have to consider the following averaged version of the second moment in eq . ( [ secmomerep ] ) : @xmath176 where @xmath177 accordingly , we need to integrate the quantities @xmath178 and @xmath179 , @xmath180 of eqs . ( [ amponek][amptwofour ] ) with respect to @xmath68 and @xmath67 . putting : @xmath181 we obtain from eqs . ( [ ampone ] ) and ( [ amptwo ] ) the following expressions of @xmath182 and @xmath183 : @xmath184 it will also be convenient to split the propagator @xmath185 of eq . ( [ gffin ] ) into two contributions : @xmath186 where @xmath187 is the free propagator of eq . ( [ gzspec ] ) , which is invariant with respect to the transformations ( [ strainvzer ] ) and ( [ strainvone ] ) , while @xmath188 in the above equation we have isolated in the expression of @xmath189 the factor : @xmath190 it is clear that the origin of the term @xmath189 in the propagator is due to presence of the @xmath0function interaction ( [ dirpot ] ) in the polymer action ( [ actnorm ] ) . in fact , if @xmath191 , this term vanishes identically . thus , using the splitting of the propagator of eq . ( [ propsplit ] ) , it is now possible to separate in eqs . ( [ amponek][amptwofour ] ) the contributions to entanglement given by repulsive forces . it seems natural to expand the quantities @xmath183 , @xmath192 and @xmath193 defined in eqs . ( [ deee ] ) , ( [ koneee ] ) and ( [ ionee ] ) with respect to @xmath194 as follows : @xmath195 where the superscript @xmath196 , with @xmath197 , denotes the order in @xmath194 . there are no higher order terms with @xmath198 , so the above expansions are exact . it is easy to show how @xmath192 and the @xmath193 s depend on the pseudo - energy @xmath71 . after a rescaling of the integration variables @xmath199 and @xmath175 in eqs . ( [ ennee ] ) and ( [ deee ] ) , one finds in fact that : @xmath200 @xmath201 where the factors @xmath202 s and the @xmath203 s are functions of the parameters @xmath150 and @xmath17 , but not of @xmath71 or @xmath15 . in fact , the coupling constant @xmath15 appears only inside the powers of @xmath194 . let us note in eqs . ( [ behaone ] ) and ( [ behatwo ] ) the presence of the overall factor @xmath204 in eqs . ( [ behaone ] ) and ( [ behatwo ] ) . looking at eq . ( [ enneeexp ] ) , it is clear that the whole function @xmath182 is characterized by the leading scaling behavior @xmath205 . in the @xmath9space , after an inverse laplace transform , this behavior corresponds to the following scaling law , which is typical of ideal polymers : @xmath206 . the powers of @xmath194 , appearing in the expressions of @xmath207 and @xmath208 , introduce corrections to this leading behavior that are at most logarithmic in @xmath71 . as a matter of fact , if the condition @xmath209 is satisfied , we have that : @xmath210 naively , the above seems the only logarithmic correction which is possible in the expressions of @xmath182 and @xmath183 when @xmath71 is small . however , that this is not true . in fact , in deriving eqs . ( [ behaone ] ) and ( [ behatwo ] ) , we have not considered the divergences which arise in some of the integrations over the variables @xmath211 and @xmath68 . after regulating these divergences with some prescription , as for instance the ultraviolet cut - off @xmath150 used in eq . ( [ gffin ] ) , we will see in section [ sec : six ] that the naive rescaling of variables exploited in order to obtain eqs . ( [ behaone ] ) and ( [ behatwo ] ) does no longer work and one should add extra logarithmic factors to these equations . ( [ behaone ] ) and ( [ behatwo ] ) may be also useful to study the case of polymers in confined geometries . as a matter of fact , for large values of @xmath71 , one recovers the limit of small values of @xmath8 , in which the region between the initial and final height is very narrow . looking at eqs . ( [ behaone ] ) and ( [ behatwo ] ) , it is clear that the only interesting corrections when @xmath71 is large come from the powers of @xmath194 . to evaluate these corrections , one should note that the modified bessel function of the second kind @xmath146 goes very fast to zero for large values of @xmath18 . as a consequence , already in the domain of parameters in which @xmath212 , it is possible to make the very interesting approximation @xmath213 unfortunately , it turns out that the values of the energy for which the above equation is satisfied are not physical , as it will be shown below . other useful information on the influence of repulsive forces on the winding angle can be obtained studying the form of the function @xmath189 of eq . ( [ nontrainvpro ] ) . we remember in fact that all the effects of the repulsive forces are concentrated in this component of the propagator . supposing for example that the value of @xmath214 is very large , i. e. : @xmath215 we have the following approximate expression of @xmath216 : @xmath217 a relation analogous to eq . ( [ appexplx ] ) may be written also for the variable @xmath218 . in practice , ( [ appexplx ] ) means that the repulsive interactions do not play any particularly relevant role in polymer configurations in which the ends of the trajectories at some point are very distant . this is not a surprise . if the trajectories at some height @xmath22 are very far from each other , they will have little or no chance to interact together via the repulsive interactions of eq . ( [ dirpot ] ) , which are of short range . ( [ appexplx ] ) gives the concrete law with which the contributions of the repulsive forces are suppressed in configurations of this kind . in particular , if the distance between the trajectories is much greater than the _ characteristic length scale _ @xmath219 the influence of the repulsive forces ceases to be relevant . of course , even if at some points the trajectories are very distant , polymers will always have a chance to get near enough to be able to interact if they are sufficiently long . as a consequence , we expect that the characteristic length @xmath220 increases with the increasing of the lengths of the trajectories . it is easy to check that this is exactly the case . to show that , let us consider the dependence of @xmath220 on the polymer length . one parameter which determines this length is the distance @xmath8 between the ends of the polymers along the @xmath35axis . indeed , a trajectory connecting the two ends of a polymer must be very long if these ends are located at very distant heights . in the energy representation , large values of @xmath8 correspond to small values of @xmath71 . for example , in the limit @xmath221 , which corresponds to infinite polymer lengths , we have that @xmath222 , confirming our intuitive expectations . another confirmation comes from eq . ( [ randisell ] ) below , where a rough estimation of the behavior of @xmath220 with respect to the distance @xmath8 is given . the dependence on @xmath8 is not the whole story . as a matter of fact , during their random walk in the @xmath35direction from @xmath37 to @xmath38 , polymers are also allowed to wander in the remaining two directions . loosely speaking , the variations in the length of the trajectories associated to the fluctuations in these transverse directions are taken into account by the parameter @xmath17 . smaller values of @xmath17 correspond to longer trajectories and vice - versa , see @xcite . it is now easy to realize from eq . ( [ chalensca ] ) that the characteristic length @xmath220 increases when @xmath17 decreases as expected . taking into account all the above considerations , it is possible to conclude that repulsive forces give relevant contributions to the second moment only in the case of configurations of the system in which the trajectories of the two polymers are not too far from each other . as a matter of fact , in the propagators appearing in the amplitudes of eqs . ( [ amponek][amptwofour ] ) all configurations in which the distance between the trajectories at some height in the @xmath35axis is bigger than a few characteristic lengths @xmath220 are exponentially suppressed according to eq . ( [ appexplx ] ) . one may also add that this suppression becomes milder in the case of long polymers , because we have seen that the characteristic lengths @xmath220 grows with the length of the polymers with a law which has been given in eq . ( [ randisell ] ) . in the rest of this section we will analyze some interesting limiting cases , in which repulsive interactions become particularly weak or strong . to this purpose , it would be appealing to consider the quantity @xmath223 , where @xmath194 has been given in eq . ( [ lambe ] ) , as an energy dependent effective or running coupling constant of the repulsive interactions . this could be suggested by the expansions of eqs . ( [ dexp][expioe ] ) and by the fact that the quantity @xmath223 has the right dimension to be a coupling constant . indeed , we will see that there are cases in which the strength of @xmath194 really determines the strength of the repulsive forces . however , this is not true in general , as it should be because @xmath194 is just a parameter which has been factored out from the expression of @xmath189 and thus its meaning does not coincide with that of a running coupling constant . keeping that in mind , we start to study the perturbative regime , in which @xmath15 is very small . in the part of the propagator in which there are the contributions of the repulsive forces , i. e. the function @xmath189 , @xmath15 is present only inside @xmath194 . expanding this quantity in powers of @xmath15 , we obtain : @xmath224 we see that , at the leading order in @xmath15 , @xmath194 is proportional to @xmath15 and thus , as it could have been expected , @xmath189 may be treated as a small perturbation with respect to the free propagator @xmath225 . let s now go back to eq . ( [ fapp ] ) . in that equation it turns out that @xmath194 has the same behavior as in the perturbative regime , even if eq ( [ fapp ] ) has been derived in the hypothesis that @xmath212 , but without supposing that @xmath15 is small . before dwelling upon the physical meaning of this coincidence , let s see what is the significance of the condition @xmath212 . to this purpose , we make the following approximations : @xmath226 as mentioned before , it is quite reasonable to assume that the length @xmath8 is proportional to the inverse of the energy @xmath71 , while the second approximation implies that polymers are very flexible . for example , in polyethylene the kuhn length@xmath227 is of the order of molecular sizes . exploiting eq . ( [ draapp ] ) , it turns out that the condition @xmath212 is equivalent to the condition @xmath228 . this would mean that our system is squeezed in a volume whose height @xmath8 is smaller than the size of a monomer . clearly , this situation is not very physical . since we have been able to compute the exact form of the propagator @xmath229 , it is not difficult to study also the strong coupling limit @xmath230 . as in the perturbative case , the only affected part of the propagator ( [ gffin ] ) is the factor @xmath194 appearing in @xmath189 . after a trivial calculation , one finds that , in the strong coupling limit , the form of @xmath189 is given by : @xmath231 assuming that polymers are very long , let us study the left hand side of the above equation . this is a ratio of modified bessel functions of the second kind . since @xmath150 is a very small quantity and these functions have a logarithmic singularity if their argument is small , see eq . ( [ fdsf ] ) , it is licit to suppose that @xmath232 unless @xmath233 and/or @xmath234 . on the other side , we know from eq . ( [ cslm ] ) that , if @xmath235 decays exponentially . in other words , in the left hand side of eq . ( [ scnontrainvpro ] ) the denominator will dominate over the numerator whenever the distance between the polymer trajectories is not of the order of a few molecular sizes . thus , if @xmath15 is large , the major contributions to winding angle coming from the repulsive interactions occur when the trajectories are very near to each other . this could be expected from the fact that , in the strong coupling limit , one recovers the excluded volume interactions . finally , let us study the domain of the parameters @xmath71 and @xmath17 in which the condition @xmath236 is verified . we will see that this domain is particularly interesting , because if condition ( [ condd ] ) is verified , the corrections of the repulsive interactions to the entropy dominated behavior of ideal polymers become relevant . it has been already shown that under the assumption made in eq . ( [ condd ] ) , the parameter @xmath194 is approximated as in eq . ( [ logcorr ] ) . even if it is not strictly necessary , we suppose here that @xmath15 has some finite value , while polymers are so long that the following inequality is satisfied : @xmath237 this further assumption is to eliminate the dependence on @xmath15 , which could introduce confusion in the following discussion due to possible interferences of condition ( [ condd ] ) with those of the perturbative and strong coupling regimes . in the @xmath9space , ( [ fjfsfd ] ) corresponds to the inequality @xmath238 . now @xmath189 may be approximated as follows : @xmath239 as promised , the above equation does not contain the parameter @xmath15 . we see from the left hand side of eq . ( [ domhigene ] ) that the function @xmath189 is logarithmically suppressed , due to the presence of @xmath240 in the denominator . this suppression effect is counterbalanced only at short distances by the two modified bessel functions of the second kind appearing in the numerator , which diverge logarithmically whenever @xmath241 and/or @xmath242 . the total result of these opposite effects in the expression of the averaged second moment will be presented in section [ sec : six ] after performing the explicit computation of the amplitudes of eqs . ( [ amponek][amptwofour ] ) . to conclude this section , let us give some concrete values of the involved parameters . first of all , let us estimate the values of @xmath8 , for which the two polymer system is in the regime ( [ condd ] ) . using the approximations made in eq . ( [ draapp ] ) , we may conclude that , if the relation ( [ condd ] ) is satisfied , the length @xmath8 needs such that @xmath243 , i. e. @xmath8 is at least of the order of hundred molecular lengths or more : @xmath244 . moreover , it is possible to give a rough estimation of the maximum distance of the end points , after which the two polymers are too far from each other to allow a relevant contribution to the winding angle due to repulsive interactions . using eq . ( [ cslm ] ) , in fact , it turns out that the repulsive interactions are relevant only in the range of distances : @xmath245 finally , the situation opposite to condition ( [ condd ] ) is not realistic , because it leads to the constraint @xmath246 . this would corresponds to the case of a polymer which is shorter than the size of the molecules composing it . at this point we are ready to compute the quantities @xmath182 and @xmath183 of eqs . ( [ ennee ] ) and ( [ deee ] ) . we start with @xmath183 . using eqs . ( [ deeeexp ] ) , ( [ dexp ] ) and the splitting ( [ propsplit ] ) of the propagator , one has at the zeroth order in @xmath194 : @xmath247 after a shift of variables , the above equation gives : @xmath248 where @xmath249 is the total surface of the system in the two dimensional space , which is transverse to the @xmath35axis . using the identity @xmath250 one finds : @xmath251 this expression of @xmath252 has the following interpretation : we are performing here an average of the second moment with respect to all possible initial and final positions of the endpoints of the polymers and @xmath183 _ counts _ the number of these configurations . the component @xmath252 of @xmath183 depends only on the free propagator @xmath144 , which is translational invariant in the sense discussed after eq . ( [ gzspec ] ) . this invariance explains why the number of configurations grows proportionally to the surface @xmath253 . the reason is that , for each configuration of the polymers , one can obtain other equivalently probable configurations by the symmetric translation of their ends on the surface @xmath253 at the initial and final instants . let us now apply to @xmath252 an inverse laplace transform , in order to go back to the @xmath9space . after a simple calculation we obtain : @xmath254 i. e. @xmath255 does not depend on @xmath8 . the next and last contribution to @xmath183 is given by : @xmath256 exploiting eq . ( [ intbas ] ) to integrate out the variables @xmath119 and @xmath257 , we get : @xmath258 we remark that the above contribution to @xmath183 vanishes in the limit @xmath191 . this could be expected due to the fact that @xmath259 collects all contributions coming from the repulsive interactions . these interactions break explicitly the translational invariance of the free part of the action and , as a consequence , @xmath259 is no longer proportional to the surface @xmath253 as @xmath252 . unfortunately , it is not easy to compute the inverse laplace transform of @xmath259 without making some approximation . to this purpose , we assume that the repulsive interactions are weak , i. e. @xmath260 , and that the value of @xmath8 is large . in this case , since we are in the domain of small @xmath71 s , it is possible to expand @xmath259 up to the second order in @xmath15 as follows : @xmath261 in order to obtain the above equation we have used both eqs . ( [ fdsf ] ) and ( [ pertapp ] ) . the inverse laplace transform of eq . ( [ deeoneexp ] ) gives : @xmath262l+\frac c{2\pi } v_0 ^ 2l\log l \label{deeonel}\ ] ] where @xmath263 is the euler constant . putting eqs . ( [ deezerointe ] ) and ( [ contdeeone ] ) together , we obtain : @xmath264 this is an exact result . an approximated expression of @xmath265 can be derived instead from eqs . ( [ dzerol ] ) and ( [ deeonel ] ) . now we turn to the derivation of @xmath182 . we start by computing order by order in @xmath194 the contributions to the quantities @xmath192 and @xmath193 of eqs . ( [ expke ] ) and ( [ expioe ] ) respectively . at the zeroth order we have for @xmath192 : @xmath266 after performing an easy integrations over the coordinates @xmath57 , one obtains : @xmath267 the remaining integral with respect to the @xmath115 coordinate is both ultraviolet and infrared divergent and needs to be regulated . we have already seen that the singularities in the ultraviolet domain may consistently be eliminated with the introduction of the small distance cut - off @xmath150 . a large distance cut - off is instead motivated by the fact that the size of a real system is necessarily finite . implicitly , we have already used this kind of infrared regularization in eq . ( [ deezero ] ) , where we have assumed that the total surface @xmath253 of the system in the directions which are transverse to the @xmath35axis is finite . supposing that the shape of @xmath253 is approximately a disk of radius @xmath268 , so that @xmath269 , we may write : @xmath270 substituting eq . ( [ polinfultint ] ) in eq . ( [ kzerot ] ) , one obtains the following expression of @xmath271 : @xmath272 the inverse laplace transform of @xmath271 gives : @xmath273 we have now to compute the quantities @xmath274 , with @xmath180 . the expressions of the @xmath275 s may be obtained from eqs . ( [ ionee ] ) and ( [ amptwoone][amptwofour ] ) , by substituting everywhere the propagator @xmath107 with its free version @xmath144 . it is easy to show that : @xmath276 this vanishing , which is actually a double vanishing , is due to the fact that each of the @xmath275 s contains an integral of a total divergence together with an integral which is zero for symmetry reasons . for some values of @xmath277 , like for instance when @xmath278 , to isolate such integrals it is necessary to perform some integrations by parts . this is allowed because the @xmath274 s are not affected by divergences , contrarily to @xmath192 . as an example , we work out explicitly the case of @xmath279 . the first vanishing integral is the following : @xmath280 this is of course zero due to symmetry reasons . the second vanishing integral in @xmath279 is of the form : @xmath281 after performing the integration over @xmath68 with the help of a shift of variables and of eq . ( [ intbas ] ) , we have , apart from a proportionality factor : @xmath282 since @xmath283 is a divergenceless vector potential , i. e. @xmath284 , @xmath285 can be rewritten as the integral of a total divergence : @xmath286 clearly , the left hand side of the above equation is zero . this fact can be also checked passing to the fourier representation . exploiting eq . ( [ ftsmbf ] ) and the formula @xmath287 in eq . ( [ deeint ] ) , one obtains : @xmath288 thus @xmath289 because @xmath290 . in an analogous way one shows that also @xmath291 and @xmath292 are identically equal to zero . we are now ready to compute the contributions to @xmath182 , which are linear in @xmath194 . first of all , we treat the term @xmath293 , which is given by : @xmath294 \label{konee}\ ] ] the integrations over @xmath67 and @xmath68 may be easily performed using eq . ( [ intbas ] ) and give as a result a factor which is proportional to @xmath204 . after that , only the following integral in @xmath115 remains to be done : @xmath295 here the ultraviolet divergence , which is present in the left hand side , has been regulated in the usual way with the introduction of the short distances cut - off @xmath150 . infrared divergences are absent . going to polar coordinates , the right hand side of the above equation becomes : @xmath296 putting everything together , one arrives at the final result : @xmath297 if the quantity @xmath298 is small , it is possible to derive the following asymptotic expression of @xmath293 : @xmath299 to go from eq . ( [ konefin ] ) to eq . ( [ koneeer ] ) , we have used the asymptotic formula : @xmath300 which is valid for small values of @xmath298 . we see from eqs . ( [ konefin ] ) and ( [ leaordaasyexp ] ) that the presence of ultraviolet divergences , together with the needed regularization , has modified the naive form of @xmath293 as a function of the pseudo - energy @xmath71 given in eq . ( [ behaone ] ) . the modification consists in the appearance of the factor @xmath301 , which exhibits a square logarithmic singularity in the limit @xmath302 . the inverse laplace transformed of @xmath293 can be derived only making some approximation . as in the case of @xmath259 , we will work in the double limit , in which @xmath15 is very small and @xmath8 is very large . after a few calculations we obtain : @xmath303\left ( \log s+c \right)+\right.\nonumber\\&&\left . \frac14l\log^2(2ca^2)+\frac 12 \log(2ca^2 ) \left [ ( c-1)l - l\log l \right ] \right\ } \label{ddd}\end{aligned}\ ] ] at this point we have to compute the expressions of the @xmath304 s , @xmath305 . it is possible to show that these contributions vanish identically , i. e. : @xmath306 the motivations of this vanishing are similar to the motivations for which there are no contributions at the zeroth order : all terms which appear in the quantities @xmath304 contain at least one integral of a total divergence or one integral , which is zero for dimensional reasons . as in the case of the @xmath274 s , there are some values of @xmath277 for which it is necessary to perform an integration by parts in order to isolate these vanishing integrals . once again , this is allowed because the @xmath304 s do not contain divergences . at the next order in @xmath194 , we have the last contribution to @xmath192 : @xmath307 after performing the integrations in @xmath68 and @xmath67 with the help of eq . ( [ intbas ] ) , eq . ( [ lcke ] ) becomes : @xmath308 the integral in @xmath115 is divergent and needs a regularization . going to polar coordinates , we obtain the result : @xmath309 also in this case , we note that the presence of the regularization modifies the dependence of @xmath310 on the pseudo - energy @xmath71 with respect to the naive formula of eq . ( [ behaone ] ) . the correction consists in the factor @xmath311 . in the limit @xmath302 , this factor diverges as powers of @xmath240 . to conclude the analysis of the contribution to @xmath182 at the second order in @xmath194 , we show that the @xmath312 s are identically equal to zero . as a matter of fact , it is easy to verify that for @xmath313 each @xmath312 contains terms of the kind : @xmath314 these terms vanish identically because of the following identity : @xmath315 substituting eq . ( [ auxfskj ] ) in eq . ( [ blmn ] ) and using the explicit expression of the vector potential @xmath283 of eq . ( [ vecpot ] ) , we get : @xmath316 clearly , the right hand side of the above equation is zero because @xmath317 . if @xmath278 , instead , the vanishing function @xmath318 of eq . ( [ blmn ] ) may be isolated in the expression of @xmath319 only after an integration by parts . finally , at the third order in @xmath194 we have only the quantities @xmath320 s , since @xmath192 has at most quadratic powers of @xmath194 . it is easy to realize that : @xmath321 because the following relations hold : s is separately equal to zero , because these quantities contain terms of the kind given in eq . ( [ blmn ] ) . ] @xmath322 as a consequence of eq . ( [ threezero ] ) , it is clear that there are no contributions to @xmath182 at this order . using eqs . ( [ kzerfin ] ) , ( [ konefin ] ) and ( [ ktwofin ] ) , we arrive at the final result for @xmath182 : @xmath323 we can now insert in the formula of the second moment of eq . ( [ secmomaveerep ] ) the functions @xmath183 and @xmath182 given in eqs . ( [ deeefin ] ) and ( [ nefin ] ) respectively . the outcome is : @xmath324 } { s+\frac \pi c\lambda(e)e^{-1 } } \label{mefin}\ ] ] in the @xmath9space , the already mentioned difficulties with the computation of the inverse laplace transform of @xmath183 and @xmath182 allow an analytical result only in the double limit of weak coupling constant @xmath15 and of large values of @xmath8 . at the first order in @xmath15 , the expression of @xmath61 reads as follows : @xmath325 where @xmath326 has been given in eq . ( [ ddd ] ) . so far , we have considered the averaged second moment of eq . ( [ secmomerep ] ) , corresponding to the case in which the polymer ends are not fixed . in the energy representation , we have seen that this version of the second moment can be exactly computed . to conclude this section , we would like to show that it is possible to provide also an exact expression of the second moment @xmath327 in the @xmath9 space and with fixed polymer ends up to an inverse laplace transform of the propagator given in eq . ( [ gffin ] ) . the starting point is the exact formula of the second moment @xmath328 of eq . ( [ feesm ] ) . all the ingredients of this formula are defined in eqs . ( [ secmomerep ] ) , ( [ nsdoqop])([nsdtqop ] ) and ( [ ampzero])([amptwofour ] ) . looking at eq . ( [ feesm ] ) , it is clear that : @xmath329 and @xmath330 let us note that the functions @xmath179 are all equal up to integrations by parts , which can shift the differential operators @xmath331 and @xmath332 in eqs . ( [ amponek])([amptwofour ] ) . this fact will be used in order to simplify the expression of the inverse laplace transformed of @xmath80 in the @xmath9space . to compute the inverse laplace transforms of both @xmath80 and @xmath81 , we use the following property of the inverse laplace transform of the product of two functions @xmath333 and @xmath334 : @xmath335 applying eq . ( [ convilp ] ) to evaluate the inverse laplace transforms of @xmath192 and of the @xmath179 in eqs . ( [ nefull ] ) and ( [ defull ] ) , we obtain after some calculations : @xmath336 the second term in the right hand side of eq . ( [ nlfull ] ) is the contribution given by the functions @xmath179 , @xmath180 , while the first term comes from @xmath178 . remembering the definition ( [ secmomnumden ] ) of the second moment in terms of @xmath74 and @xmath75 , we get : @xmath337^{-1}\left[\frac 2c \int d^2x { { \mbox{\bf a}}}^2({{\mbox{\bf x}}})\int_0^l ds g(l - s;{{\mbox{\bf r}}}_1,{{\mbox{\bf x}}})g(s;{{\mbox{\bf x}}},{{\mbox{\bf r}}}_0)\right.\nonumber\\ & & \!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\ ! \!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\ ! \left.-\frac{2}{c^2}\int d^2x\int d^2 y\int_0^lds g(l - s;{{\mbox{\bf x}}},{{\mbox{\bf r}}}_1)\int_0^s ds ' \partial_x^i\partial_y^jg(s - s';{{\mbox{\bf y}}},{{\mbox{\bf x } } } ) g(s';{{\mbox{\bf r}}}_0,{{\mbox{\bf y } } } ) a_i({{\mbox{\bf x}}})a_j({{\mbox{\bf y}}})\right]\label{formtl}\end{aligned}\ ] ] if we knew how to compute the propagator @xmath132 starting from its laplace transformed ( [ gffin ] ) , we could evaluate explicitly the expression of the second moment in the @xmath9space . unfortunately , it is too complicated to perform the inverse laplace transform of the propagator @xmath107 . due to this technical difficulty , eq . ( [ formtl ] ) is only formal . progress can be made however in the limit @xmath191 , in which the propagator is given by the green function @xmath144 of eq . ( [ gzspec ] ) . this will be done in the next section . in order to allow the comparison with previous results , this section is dedicated to the case of ideal chains in which @xmath191 . first of all , we discuss the formula of the averaged second moment derived in the previous section , eq . ( [ mlfin ] ) . in the limit @xmath191 , ( [ mlfin ] ) becomes : @xmath338 the presence of a geometrical factor like the surface @xmath253 of the system in the expression of @xmath339 has been already related to the translational symmetry of eqs . ( [ strainvzer ] ) and ( [ strainvone ] ) . assuming that this surface has approximately the shape of a disc of radius @xmath268 , we can put @xmath340 as in eq . ( [ polinfultint ] ) . ( [ mlzerofin ] ) predicts that the average degree of entanglement scales as follows with respect to the distance @xmath268 : @xmath341 the meaning of eq . ( [ scalerisr ] ) is the following . we remember that the averaged second moment @xmath339 describes the entanglement of two closed polymers whose ends on the surfaces at @xmath37 and @xmath38 are not fixed . in this way , the polymers are allowed to move freely and it is natural to suppose that , the bigger will be the volume @xmath342 in which the polymers fluctuate , the bigger will be also the average distance between them . thus , if the surface @xmath253 increases its area , the probability of entanglement must decrease . the exact law of this decreasing is given by eq . ( [ scalerisr ] ) . on the other side , one would expect that the probability of getting entangled is higher for long polymers than for short polymers . ( [ mlzerofin ] ) gives a result which is in agreement with the above expectation , because the second moment @xmath343 scales as follows with respect to the parameters @xmath8 and @xmath17 , which determine the polymer length : @xmath344 in particular , one can show that the total length of a polymer increases proportionally to @xmath8 and it is inversely proportional to the square root of @xmath17 @xcite . accordingly , we see from eq . ( [ scalereslc ] ) that @xmath343 increases proportionally to @xmath8 and inversely proportional to @xmath17 . at this point we wish to study the second moment @xmath345 of polymers with fixed endpoints . the subscript @xmath346 has been added to the symbol of the second moment to remember that we are working in the limit @xmath191 . since we are dealing with ideal polymers , we have to substitute everywhere in eq . ( [ formtl ] ) the full propagator @xmath132 with the free one . the result of this operation is : @xmath347^{-1}\left[\frac 2c \int d^2x { { \mbox{\bf a}}}^2({{\mbox{\bf x}}})\int_0^l ds g_0(l - s;{{\mbox{\bf r}}}_1,{{\mbox{\bf x}}})g_0(s;{{\mbox{\bf x}}},{{\mbox{\bf r}}}_0)-\right.\nonumber\\ & & \!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\ ! \!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\left.\frac{2}{c^2}\int d^2x\int d^2 y\int_0^lds g_0(l - s;{{\mbox{\bf x}}},{{\mbox{\bf r}}}_1)\int_0^s ds ' \partial_x^i\partial_y^jg_0(s - s';{{\mbox{\bf y}}},{{\mbox{\bf x } } } ) g_0(s';{{\mbox{\bf r}}}_0,{{\mbox{\bf y } } } ) a_i({{\mbox{\bf x}}})a_j({{\mbox{\bf y}}})\right]\label{mlfullvez}\end{aligned}\ ] ] we notice that , as it could be expected , eq . ( [ mlfullvez ] ) coincides with the expression obtained in @xcite for the second moment of one polymer winding up around an infinitely long straight wire lying along the @xmath5axis . luckily , the propagator @xmath348 can be explicitly constructed upon computing the inverse laplace transform of the propagator @xmath349 of eq . ( [ gzspec ] ) : @xmath350 it is easy to check that the second term in the right hand side of eq . ( [ mlfullvez ] ) , which is associated with the contributions coming from the @xmath179 s , does not grow with increasing values of @xmath8 . as a matter of fact , after a rescaling of variables , the numerator of this term gives : @xmath351\nonumber\\ & & \frac 1{t ' } e^{-\frac c{2(t')}\left|{\mbox{\mbld{y}}}'-\frac{\mathbf r_0}l\right|^2 } \label{mlsmfullvez}\end{aligned}\ ] ] in the limit @xmath352 , the quantity in the right hand side of the above equation scales as @xmath353 , where @xmath10 is a constant . moreover , the propagator ( [ freelprop ] ) , which is in the denominator , scales as @xmath354 . thus , the ratio between the right hand side of eq . ( [ mlsmfullvez ] ) and the propagator ( [ freelprop ] ) does not depend on @xmath8 . this completes the proof of our statement . as a consequence of this statement , as far as the scaling of @xmath345 for large values of @xmath8 is concerned , it is possible to make the following approximation : @xmath355^{-1 } \int d^2x { { \mbox{\bf a}}}^2({{\mbox{\bf x}}})\int_0^l ds g_0(l - s;{{\mbox{\bf r}}}_1,{{\mbox{\bf x}}})g_0(s;{{\mbox{\bf x}}},{{\mbox{\bf r}}}_0 ) \label{star}\ ] ] unfortunately , despite of the fact that we are treating ideal polymers , the integral in @xmath356 appearing in the above equation is still complicated and requires some approximation to be evaluated analytically . we will apply to this purpose the strategy used in ref . @xcite to compute the second moment of three dimensional polymers , adapting it to our two - dimensional case . first of all , let us note that the integral in ( [ star ] ) is ultraviolet divergent . however , the infrared divergences which appeared in the energy representation are absent . this is due to the behavior of the propagator @xmath126 , which is much milder at infinity than the behavior of the green function @xmath144 . to regulate the singularities at small distances , we proceed as usual by introducing the cut - off @xmath150 . after a rescaling of all variables similar to that of eq . ( [ mlsmfullvez ] ) , we get : @xmath357^{-1}\times \nonumber\\ & & \!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\ ! \int_{|x'|\ge\frac{a\sqrt c}{\sqrt l } } \frac{d^2x'}l \frac 1{\mathbf x'^2 } \int_0 ^ 1 \frac{ds'}{s'(1-s ' ) } \left ( \frac c{2\pi } \right)^2 e^{-\frac 1{2(1-s')}\left|\mathbf x'-\mathbf r_1\sqrt{\frac cl}\right|^2 } e^{-\frac 1{2s'}\left|\mathbf x'-\mathbf r_0\sqrt{\frac cl}\right|^2 } \label{starst}\end{aligned}\ ] ] to go further , following @xcite , we assume that the relevant contribution to the integral in @xmath358 comes from a narrow region around the singularity in @xmath359 . thus , we may put @xmath360 after making the above crude approximation , we obtain : @xmath361^{-1}\log\left(\sqrt{\frac lc}a\right ) \int_0 ^ 1ds'\left [ \frac 1{1-s ' } e^{-\frac 1{2(1-s')}\mathbf r_1 ^ 2\frac cl } e^{-\frac 1{2s'}\mathbf r_0 ^ 2\frac cl}+ \right.\nonumber\\ & & \left . \frac 1{s ' } e^{-\frac 1{2(1-s')}\mathbf r_1 ^ 2\frac cl } e^{-\frac 1{2s'}\mathbf r_0 ^ 2\frac cl}\right ] \label{starstar}\end{aligned}\ ] ] in deriving the above equation we have used the simple relation @xmath362 . let us now study the integral @xmath363 the other integral in @xmath364 appearing in ( [ starstar ] ) can be treated in the same way after the change of variables @xmath365 . it is not to allowed to take in the right hand side of eq . ( [ inttrian ] ) the limit @xmath352 because in this way the integral will not be convergent due to the singularity in @xmath366 . for this reason , we split the domain of integration as follows : @xmath367 where @xmath368 . clearly , the second integral converges after performing the limit @xmath352 in the integrand and gives : @xmath369 the first integral instead diverges logarithmically with growing values of @xmath8 . however , now it is possible to expand the exponential @xmath370 in powers of its argument , because the singularity in @xmath371 lies outside the interval @xmath372 $ ] . keeping only the leading order term with respect to @xmath8 , we get : @xmath373 where ei@xmath374 is the exponential - integral function . when @xmath8 is large , this function may be approximated as follows : ei@xmath375 and , as a consequence : @xmath376 the second integral which we have left in eq . ( [ starstar ] ) gives the same result . putting everything together in the expression of the second moment of eq . ( [ starstar ] ) , we obtain the final result : @xmath377 this is exactly the behavior of the second moment derived in ref . @xcite . in this article we have studied the entanglement of two directed polymers from a non - perturbative point of view . our formulas of the second moment , a quantity which measures the degree of entanglement of the two polymers , take into account the repulsive forces acting on the segments of the polymers and are exact . the averaged second moment defined in eq . ( [ aderr ] ) , a version of the second moment corresponding to the situation in which the end points of the polymers are free to move , has been computed in eq . ( [ mefin ] ) as a function of the chemical potential @xmath71 conjugated to the distance @xmath8 between the end points in the @xmath35direction . the case of free ends is relevant in the treatment of nematic polymers and polymers in a nematic solvent @xcite . let us note that also the expression of the second moment without any averaging and in the @xmath8 space can be computed . this has been done in eq . ( [ formtl ] ) . however , this equation is explicit only up to the inverse laplace transform of the propagator ( [ gffin ] ) , which is too hard to be obtained in closed form . eq . ( [ mefin ] ) shows that the averaged second moment is of the form @xmath378 . the overall factor @xmath379 coincides with the scaling power law of two ideal polymers . the correction @xmath333 to this fundamental behavior due to the repulsive interactions is a complicated function of @xmath71 , whose analysis would require numerical methods . nevertheless , it is possible to identify a dominance of the repulsive interactions in the domain of parameters in which the condition @xmath380 is satisfied . this corresponds roughly speaking to the situation in which polymers are very long . in this region , the scaling laws with respect to the energy @xmath71 of the numerator and denominator appearing in the right hand side of eq . ( [ mefin ] ) are corrected by factors which are logarithmic powers of @xmath240 , see for instance eq . ( [ leaordaasyexp ] ) . one advantage of our approach is that it is easy to separate within the expression of the second moment the contributions of purely entropic origin which are typical of free polymers from the contributions coming from the presence of the @xmath0function potential in the polymer action . this is essentially due to the splitting ( [ appexplx ] ) of the propagator @xmath229 appearing in the amplitudes ( [ amponek][amptwofour ] ) . the component @xmath187 of the propagator coincides with the propagator of ideal polymers , while the component @xmath189 takes into account the effects of the interactions . thanks to the splitting ( [ appexplx ] ) , it has been possible to study the way in which the repulsive forces affect the average degree of entanglement of the two polymers . this has been done in section [ sec : five ] . our results are in agreement with the intuition . the precise law with which the effects of the repulsive forces on the entanglement decrease when the distance between the trajectories increases is given by eq . ( [ appexplx ] ) . in section [ sec : five ] it has been discussed also the strong coupling limit , which should be taken to recover the limit of excluded volume interactions . in our exact approach , it is not difficult to consider the case in which the coupling constant @xmath15 is large . for instance , the component @xmath189 of the propagator , which is responsible of the effects due to the repulsive interactions , has been given in the strong coupling limit in eq . ( [ scnontrainvpro ] ) . studying the form of this component assuming that polymers are very long , it has been argued that , at strong coupling , the major contributions to the winding angle coming from the repulsive interactions occur when the trajectories are very near to each other . many other qualitative and quantitative characteristics of the behavior of the two polymer system under consideration have been presented in section [ sec : five ] . the case of ideal polymers , in which @xmath191 , has been discussed at the end of section [ sec : seven ] in order to make comparison with previous works . the scaling of the averaged second moment for large values of @xmath8 obtained in eq . ( [ scalereslc ] ) is in agreement with the results of @xcite , if one takes into account the fact that , after the averaging procedure of eq . ( [ aderr ] ) and the infrared regularization of eqs . ( [ deezero ] ) and ( [ polinfultint ] ) . one is effectively treating a system of polymers confined in a cylinder of finite volume @xmath342 . in section [ sec : seven ] we have evaluated the second moment , always of two ideal polymers , using the approach of ref . the outcome of this calculation , namely the scaling behavior of @xmath381 at the leading order in @xmath8 , is reported in eq . ( [ lllsecmomfreefin ] ) . this result is in agreement with the square logarithmic behavior obtained in @xcite , but not with the logarithmic behavior predicted in @xcite . however , this discrepancy can be expected due to the fact that , in section [ sec : seven ] , we have assumed , following ref . @xcite , that the most relevant contribution to the second moment coming from the integral in eq . ( [ starst ] ) is concentrated in a narrow region near the singularity in @xmath359 . this clashes with the assumptions of ref . @xcite , in which instead it is argued that the main increase in the winding angle does not occur when the polymer trajectories are near , but rather when they are far one from the other . finally , there is also an apparent discrepancy between the linear scaling with respect to @xmath8 of the averaged second moment @xmath339 and the square logarithmic scaling of the second moment @xmath345 . this disagreement is explained by the fact that , in the first case , the ends of the polymers are free to fluctuate , while in the second case they are fixed . it is therefore licit to expect that two polymers with free ends are more likely to entangle than two polymers whose ends are constrained . concluding , we would like to discuss possible further developments of this work , together with some problems which are still left open . first of all , the number of entangling polymers has been limited to two . to go beyond this restriction , one should explore the possibility of replacing the external vector potential @xmath283 of eq . ( [ vecpot ] ) with chern simons fields . abelian chern - simons field theories have been already successfully applied in order to impose topological constraints to the trajectories of an arbitrary number of closed polymer rings in @xcite . we hope to extend those results also to the case of directed polymers in a forthcoming publication . of course , if the polymer trajectories are open , the constraints among them are no longer of topological nature as in @xcite , so that the application of chern - simons field theory to directed polymers should be considered with some care . we have also not made any attempt to introduce in the treatment of polymer entanglement more sophisticated constraints than those which can be imposed with the help of the winding angle . this is in effect still an unsolved problem , despite the fact that two powerful and strategies have been proposed for its solution @xcite . in the first approach , pioneered independently by kleinert , kholodenko and one of the authors @xcite . the constraints are expressed via the wilson loop amplitudes of non - abelian chern - simons field theories . some progresses toward a concrete realization of this program in polymer physics have been made in refs . @xcite . in the second approach , developed by nechaev and coworkers , see @xcite and references therein . polymer trajectories are mapped on a complex plane with punctures . the link invariants necessary to impose the constraints are then constructed using the properties of conformal maps . another possible development is the treatment of attractive interactions , in which the strength @xmath15 in eq . ( [ dirpot ] ) takes negative values . in this case , the @xmath0function potential admits a bound state @xcite and the propagator of eq . ( [ gffin ] ) develops a singularity , in which @xmath382 , at the energy corresponding to this bound state . it would be extremely interesting to investigate how these facts affect the polymers entanglement . another issue which deserves attention is that of hairpin turns . hairpins are important in nematic solvents @xcite and can be included with the help of field theories @xcite . we note also that in our formalism it is also possible to study the entanglement of polymers in confined geometries . for example , values of @xmath71 which are near to @xmath383 ( @xmath384 ) correspond roughly speaking to the situation in which polymers fluctuate in a quasi two - dimensional environment , in which the height in the @xmath35direction is of the order of a few molecular sizes . finally , an open problem , which has not be discussed here because we were mainly interested in the second moment . is the derivation of the full partition function @xmath64 of eq . ( [ laplrep ] ) . as anticipated in the introduction , it is not an easy task to compute @xmath64 because the repulsive potential of eq . ( [ dirpot ] ) is not central . we note however that the expression of @xmath64 coincides with the green function of a spin @xmath385 aharonov - bohm problem in the imaginary time formulation of quantum mechanics . this green function has been already derived in @xcite using sophisticated techniques developed in refs . @xcite , which bypass all the difficulties of dealing with a non - central potential . thus , in principle , the expression of the partition function @xmath64 is known . unfortunately , some of the consistency conditions imposed on the parameters in ref . @xcite seem to be incompatible with the requirements of our physical problem , as noted in section [ sec : three ] . for these reasons , the computation of the full partition function @xmath64 is still a problem which needs further investigations . luckily , the knowledge of the partition function is not necessary if one is interested to study the excluded volume interactions , which arise in the strong coupling limit . in fact , in this case it is possible to apply a powerful method due to kleinert @xcite . this method turns the weak coupling expansion into a strong coupling expansion which is convergent for large values of @xmath15 and is able to accommodate also the anomalous dimensions of quantum field theories . the convergence of this strong coupling expansion is mostly very fast , so that only a few coefficients of the weak coupling expansion must be known , see refs . @xcite for more details . these coefficients can be easily computed starting from the well known partition function of the aharonov - bohm problem without the insertion of the @xmath0function potential @xcite and treating this potential as a small perturbation assuming that the value of @xmath15 is small . the application of kleinert s method in order to complete the brief analysis of the strong coupling limit made in this paper is work in progress . 99 s. a. wasserman and n. r. cozzarelli , _ science _ * 232 * ( 1986 ) , 951 ; s. d. levene , c. donahue , t. c. boles and n. r. cozzarelli , _ biophys . * 69 * ( 1995 ) , 1036 ; f. livolant and y. bouligand , * j. phys . * ( paris ) * 47 * ( 1986 ) , 1813 ; r. podgornik , d. c. rau and v. a. parsegian , _ macromolecules _ * 22 * ( 1989 ) , 1780 . s. chandrasekhar , b. k. sadashiva and k. a. suresh , _ pramana _ * 9 * ( 1977 ) , 471 ; nguyen huu tinh , h. gasparoux and c. destrade , _ mol . _ * 68 * ( 1981 ) , 101 ; t. k. attwood , j. e. lyndon and f. jones , _ liq . crys . _ * 1 * ( 1986 ) , 499 . c. blisle , _ ann . * 17 * ( 1989 ) , 1377 . j. w. pitman and m. yor , _ ann . * 14 * ( 1986 ) , 733 . a. comtet , j. desbois and c. monthus , _ jour . * 73 * ( 1993 ) , 433 . a. grosberg and s. nechaev , _ polymer topology _ , advances in polymer science * 106 * , ( springer verlag , 1993 ) , 1 . b. drossel and m. kardar , in _ theoretical and mathematical models in polymer research _ , a. grosberg ( editor ) , ( academic press , 1998 ) , 187 ; cond - mat/9610019 ; _ phys . rev . _ * e53 * ( 1996 ) , 5861 . f. tanaka , _ prog . * 68 * ( 1982 ) , 148 . d. r. nelson , in _ observation , prediction and simulation of phase transitions in complex fluids _ , m. baus , l. f. rull and j. p. ryckaert ( eds . ) , ( kluwer , the netherlands , 1995 ) . j. d. moroz and r. d. kamien , _ nucl . _ * b506 * [ fs ] ( 1997 ) , 695 . a. l. kholodenko and t. a. vilgis , _ phys . _ * 298 * ( 1998 ) , 251 . f. ferrari and i. lazzizzera , phys . b * 444 * ( 1998 ) 167 ; f. ferrari , h. kleinert and i. lazzizzera , _ eur . phys . j. _ b * 18 * ( 2000 ) , 645 . m. otto , _ j. phys . a : math . * 34 * ( 2001 ) , 2539 ; _ topological interactions in systems of mutually interlinked polymer rings _ , cond - mat/0402104 . m. g. brereton and s. shah , _ a _ : math . * 15 * ( 1982 ) , 989 . s. edwards , _ proc . soc . _ * 91 * ( 1967 ) , 513 ; _ a_1 ( 1968 ) , 15 . f. spitzer , _ trans . _ * 87 * ( 1958 ) , 187 . s. prager and h. l. frisch , _ j. chem . * 46 * ( 1967 ) , 1475 . n. saito and y. chen , _ * 59 * ( 1973 ) , 3701 . h. kleinert , _ path integrals in quantum mechanics , statistics , polymer physics , and financial markets _ , ( world scientific publishing , 3nd ed . , singapore , 2003 ) . m. kardar and y .- c . zhang , _ phys . * 58 * ( 1987 ) . 2087 ; m. kardar , g. parisi and y .- c . zhang , _ phys . * 56 * ( 1986 ) , 889 . r. d. kamien , p. le doussal and d. r. nelson , _ phys . rev . _ * a 45 * ( 12 ) ( 1992 ) , 8727 . k. iwata and t. kimura , _ phys . _ * 74 * ( 1981 ) , 2039 . h. bethe and r. peierls , _ proc . ( london ) * 148a * ( 1935 ) , 146 ; e. fermi , _ ricerca scientifica _ * 7 * ( 1936 ) , 13 , [ english translation : e. fermi , _ collected papers _ vol italy 19211938 ( university of chicago press , chicago , 1962 ) ] . f. berezin and l. faddeev , _ sov . * 2 * ( 1961 ) , 372 . s. albeverio , f. geztesy , r. hoeg - krohn and h. holden , _ solvable models in quantum mechanics _ ( springer verlag , berlin , 1988 ) ; s. albeverio , z. brzeniak andl . dabrowski , _ jour . * 27 * ( 1994 ) , 4933 . p. gerbert , _ phys . * 40 * ( 1989 ) , 1346 . c. r. hagen , _ phys . * 64 * ( 1990 ) , 503 ; _ int . _ a*4 * ( 1991 ) , 3119 . c. grosche , _ phys . * 71 * ( 1993 ) , 1 ; _ ann . phys . _ * 3 * ( 1994 ) , 283 . d. k. park , _ jour . * 36 * ( 10 ) ( 1995 ) , 5453 . r. p. feynman and a. r. hibbs , _ quantum mechanics and path integrals _ , ( mcgraw - hill , new york , 1965 ) . l. s. schulman , _ techniques and applications of path integrals _ , ( wiley , new york , 1981 ) . r. jackiw , _ delta function potential in two- and three - dimensional quantum mechanics _ , in m. a. bg memorial volume , a. ali and p. hoodbhoy ( eds . ) , ( worlds scientific , singapore , 1991 ) . h. kleinert , _ phys . rev . _ * d57 * ( 1998 ) , 2264 . h. kleinert , _ phys . lett . _ * b434 * ( 1998 ) , 74 , [ arxiv : cond - mat/9801167 ] . h. kleinert and v. schulte - frohlinde , _ critical properties of @xmath386theories _ , world scientific , singapore 2001 . f. ferrari , _ phys . lett . _ * a323 * ( 2004 ) , 351 , cond - mat/0401104 . f. ferrari , h. kleinert and i. lazzizzera , int . j. mod . phys . b*14 * ( 2000 ) 3881 [ arxiv : cond - mat/0005300 ] . h. kleinert , _ pfadintegrale in quantenmechanik , statistik un polymerphysik _ , spektrum akademischer verlag , heidelberg , 1st edition 1993 , 850p . , isbn 3 - 86025 - 613 - 0 . a. kholodenko , _ trends in chem . 3 , research trends inc . trivandrum , india ( 1994 ) , pp . s. nechaev and r. voituriez , _ conformal geometry and invariants of 3-strand brownian braids _ , [ arxiv : hep - th/0407008 ] . f. ferrari , _ chern - simons field theories with non - semisimple gauge group of symmetry _ _ jour . math . * 44 * ( 1 ) ( 2003 ) , 138 , hep - th/0210100 . f. ferrari , _ topological field theories with non - semisimple gauge group of symmetry and engineering of topological invariants _ , published in _ trends in field theory research _ , o. kovras ( ed . ) , nova science publishers ( 2004 ) . j. cardy , _ jour . phys . a _ * 16 * ( 1983 ) , l355 . Abstract:

Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.

Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered . Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video . Paper: recently , x - shaped radio galaxies ( xrgs)a peculiar class of radio galaxies with two pairs of misaligned lobes @xcite have received significant attention as new observations have explored and critiqued the competing models for the origin of their odd morphology . the distinctive `` x '' shape occurs due to the intersection of two centro - symmetric synchrotron - emitting structures at a common nucleus ( e.g. figure [ 3c403 ] ) . one of these structures is associated with an active relativistic jet ( the `` primary '' lobes ) whereas the other is fainter , more ragged , and does not appear to harbor a jet ( the `` secondary '' lobes or `` wings '' ) . the wings can be long , collimated , and symmetric about the nucleus , and may even exhibit z - shaped morphology of their own @xcite . the origin of the wings is not presently understood , but xrgs share other characteristics which indicate a common origin . x - shaped sources make up about 510% of fanaroff - riley type ii ( fr ii ; * ? ? ? * ) radio galaxies ( e.g. * ? ? ? the consensus sample is fairly small , but with the identification of @xmath0 `` candidate '' xrgs @xcite , a search for trends is now possible . based on the combined consensus and candidate sample , xrgs tend to have radio powers and host optical luminosities near the fr i / ii `` break '' in a ledlow - owen radio power visual magnitude @xcite type plot @xcite , and reside in elliptical galaxies with larger - than - average black hole masses ( inferred from the @xmath1 relation and broad lines from the active galactic nucleus ; * ? ? ? xrgs do not seem to be in galaxies currently undergoing a merger based on inferred starburst history @xcite and a spectroscopic search for broad emission lines and dusty nuclei @xcite , but the dynamic ages of their active lobes are younger than the age of the starburst @xcite . the wings are preferentially co - aligned with the _ minor _ axis of the host , whereas the primary lobes tend to be co - aligned with the major axis @xcite ; this alignment has been confirmed in the x - rays which trace the distribution of hot gas in and around the host galaxies that provides the working surface which shapes the radio galaxy @xcite . the radiative age of the wings does not seem to follow a clear trend , as some wings have steeper spectral indices than the primary lobes ( implying ageing ) whereas others do not @xcite . notably , some wings are actually longer than the primary lobes , and wings are only found in radio galaxies with strong bridges . a critical review of the observational data and existing models is found in @xcite ; here we briefly summarize the main threads . the origin of the secondary lobes has been attributed to ( i ) a rapid reorientation of the spin axis of the supermassive black hole ( smbh ) powering the jet ( i.e. the wings are fossils ) , either due to a smbh merger ( e.g. * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ) or rapid precession ( e.g. * ? ? ? * ) ; ( ii ) redirection and collimation of `` backflow '' ( spent jet plasma flowing back from the terminal shocks ) @xcite ; ( iii ) a binary agn @xcite ; and ( iv ) interaction of the jet with disturbed morphology ( e.g. stellar shells , phase - wrapped remnants of a merged disk galaxy ; * ? ? ? since xrgs are usually strongly bridged sources and are apparently aware of their environments , it is worth examining closely the hypothesis that the x - shaped morphology originates from an interaction between the radio galaxy and its environment . in this paper , we seek to test the viability of the _ backflow model _ with three - dimensional hydrodynamic simulations in elliptical atmospheres . [ 3c403 ] in the backflow model , wings are produced by a single agn outburst with powerful jets as the backflow is diverted along the steepest pressure gradient of the surrounding atmosphere ( i.e. the minor axis ) . the wings either rise buoyantly or are driven in this direction @xcite or form as supersonic outflows along the direction of least resistance from a ruptured overpressured cocoon @xcite . these scenarios naturally explain the observed correlation between the wings and the minor axis as well as the dearth of strictly fr i xrgs ( the weaker fr i sources do not produce powerful back - flows ) . however , the backflow model faces significant challenges , most notably the very long wings in many xrgs ( often longer than the primary lobes ) . whereas powerful jets are expected to drive through the surrounding medium supersonically , wings which expand buoyantly would do so at most transonically for most of their lives @xcite . because , in this model , fluid effects are primarily responsible for the `` x '' shape , hydrodynamic simulations are an ideal proving ground . although recent hydrodynamic simulations of radio galaxy morphology exist in the literature , ( e.g. * ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ) , most are not concerned with the formation of lateral asymmetries such as wings . in view of advances in simulating radio galaxies in the past decade , the mounting evidence that xrgs constitute a population demands a critical look at the backflow model with new simulations . in this paper , we discuss 3d hydrodynamic models of radio galaxies ignited in initially relaxed , elliptical atmospheres and examine how wings form . we begin by discussing our simulation setup and strategy for exploring wing production in section 2 , then present our model runs and describe the evolution of a generic winged source in section 3 . in particular , we find that favorable pressure gradients are necessary but not sufficient to produce an x - shaped source ; the character and time evolution of the jet is equally important . in section 4 , we briefly discuss the missing and artificial physics in our simulations , and in section 5 we assess the backflow model in view of our results as well as discuss the implications for the broader picture of radio lobe morphology . finally , in section 6 we summarize our main results and conclusions . throughout this paper we use the terms `` secondary lobes '' and `` wings '' interchangeably . we also use the term `` winged '' source to refer to any radio source with substantial symmetric off - axis distortions whereas `` x - shaped '' sources are a subset of winged sources with an axial wing - to - lobe length ratio of more than @xmath2 . this nomenclature reflects the view of the hydrodynamic model in which xrgs are indeed a subset of a broader category of distortions . finally , we use the term `` back - flows '' to refer specifically to actual fluid flows heading back to the nucleus from the jet heads , whereas we use `` backflow '' to refer to the material in these flows . we use a parallelized version of the zeus code @xcite for our hydrodynamic simulations . zeus is a second - order ( spatial accuracy ) eulerian finite - differencing magnetohydrodynamic ( mhd ) code which solves the standard equations of hydrodynamics , @xmath3 for an ideal compressible fluid and introduces artificial viscosity for shocks . the version we use , zeus - mpv2 , is based on the national center for supercomputing applications ( ncsa ) code described in @xcite . we use spherical polar coordinates ( @xmath4,@xmath5,@xmath6 ) in the purely hydrodynamical mode for all our runs ; the jets are therefore injected from an inner boundary sphere with some small , but finite , radius @xmath7 . we outline our basic simulation setup below , followed by our strategy for exploring winged sources and a description of the evolution of a standard double - lobed source for comparison . hydrodynamic and mhd simulations of radio galaxies interacting with their surroundings are common due to the possibility that energy deposited by the lobes is a mode of heating in agn feedback scenarios . we do not incorporate relativistic jet physics since we are primarily concerned with lobe mixing and evolution , but the robustness of this assumption is explored in section 4.1 . we note here that non - relativistic , light , hypersonic hydrodynamic jets reproduce several essential features of jets . these include recollimation shocks , terminal shocks at the jet head ( associated with radio `` hot spots '' ) and back - flows of spent material from the terminal shocks which sheath the jet and produce lobes . since we are interested in the evolution of back - flowing fluid in anisotropic environments , we adopt a non - relativistic purely hydrodynamic scheme . we inject the jets as bi - directional flows into an initially hydrostatic , ellipsoidal atmosphere . the atmospheres we set up are ellipsoids with a polytropic equation of state ( @xmath8 ) and a 3d @xmath9-model density profile @xcite given by @xmath10 where @xmath11 , @xmath12 is the core radius , and @xmath13 is the core density . to adapt this model for elliptical atmospheres , we make the radial density profile dependent on angle by adding a major - axis position angle pa and ellipticity @xmath14 to the atmosphere , which we denote as @xmath15 for an elliptical atmosphere . to easily allow for triaxial atmospheres , we define the ellipsoid in cartesian space ( @xmath16 , @xmath17 , @xmath18 ) and break up @xmath14 along each axis , then transform back to spherical coordinates to obtain the radius @xmath15 using the grid coordinates ( @xmath4 , @xmath5 , @xmath6 ) : @xmath19\\ y_e & = & r \sin(\theta)\biggl[\sin(\phi)cos(\text{pa})-\cos(\phi)\sin(\text{pa})\biggr]\\ z_e & = & r \cos(\theta)\biggl[\cos(\text{pa } ) + \sin(\text{pa})\biggr],\end{aligned}\ ] ] where pa is nominally measured clockwise from the @xmath20-axis ( in practice , it is only the difference between the jet axis and the major axis of the ellipsoid that matters ) . to normalize the size of the atmosphere , @xmath21 in equation 5 is defined as the largest value of @xmath14 along each axis . for example , an atmosphere with large @xmath22 is elongated along the @xmath20-axis . equations 4 and 5 may be understood as saying that introducing @xmath14 changes the effective core radius along a given axis : @xmath23 . for example , if @xmath24 , @xmath25 , and @xmath26 , then along the @xmath20-axis @xmath27 and along the @xmath28-axis @xmath29 . this phrasing is convenient when comparing the major and minor axes rather than the quantities along the full range of angles @xmath5 and @xmath6 and we use it hereafter . the atmospheres are initially set up in hydrostatic equilibrium , @xmath30 assuming that the background dark matter potential is static and dominant so that the gas self - gravity is not important . we define the adiabatic sound speed @xmath31 in code units and set up an isothermal atmosphere so the potential @xmath32 is @xmath33 since xrgs are powerful radio galaxies and exist at low redshift , we assume a smooth intergalactic / intracluster medium ( igm / icm ) and gas - poor systems , i.e. no disk of colder ( i.e. atomic or molecular ) material in the host ( c.f . * ? ? ? we note that in several exploratory runs , additional atmospheric complexity is overlaid onto a smooth atmosphere with no change in the gravitational potential @xmath32 , i.e. not initially in hydrostatic equilibrium . the jets in our simulations are hypersonic ( @xmath34100@xmath35 ) light ( @xmath36 ) flows injected in pressure equilibrium with the ambient material from back - to - back circular footpoints on the small inner boundary sphere at the origin . the kinetic luminosity of the jets is given by @xmath37 where @xmath38 is the area of the footpoint at @xmath7 , and ignoring higher order contributions from the gravitational energy or thermal flux . to tune @xmath39 we primarily vary @xmath40 because ( i ) @xmath39 is most sensitive to changes in @xmath40 , ( ii ) the jets must be `` light '' to ensure that the kelvin - helmholtz instability growth rate at the boundary of the cocoon is approximately the same as in the relativistic case @xcite , and ( iii ) jets are highly collimated . the maximum jet width is constrained by high - resolution x - ray observations of jet knots ( e.g. * ? ? ? * ) and very long baseline interferometry observations of transverse structures ( e.g. * ? ? ? . however , we note that in section 3.2 we vary @xmath41 and @xmath38 in a limited range . we insist that the jet cover enough grid zones ( @xmath42 ) to resolve transverse structures such as the oblique shocks which collimate the jet . the jet is rapidly precessed around a small angle ( @xmath43 ) at @xmath44 rad s@xmath45 ( code time ) to break the axisymmetry of the simulation setup and simulate helical instabilities , thus spreading the thrust out over a larger working surface ( c.f . ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? the location of the jet on the inflow sphere is thus given by @xmath46 . although the angular quantities are free parameters , they are constrained by the observed collimation of jets . typical values are @xmath47 and @xmath48 for @xmath49 . in agreement with other work , these jets develop a cylindrical core of fast - moving material sheathed in a slower concentric shell continuous at the boundaries with the surrounding material and core . we use a grid with zones spaced according to a geometric series in @xmath4 and @xmath5 ( 256 bins each ) and uniformly in @xmath6 ( 64 bins ) . this grid resolves the internal jet structure and important processes near the injection footpoints . we choose @xmath50 $ ] and @xmath51 $ ] to avoid the polar singularity and begin with reasonably sized grid zones . the @xmath5 grid is broken into two symmetric 128-bin components with the smallest zones near the poles where the jets are injected . the adequacy of our grid is demonstrated by a run with double the resolution in each direction which produces similar internal jet structure . mixing is not substantially different at the lobe boundaries . we use periodic boundary conditions in the @xmath6 direction and reflecting boundary conditions in @xmath5 . the outer @xmath4 boundary at @xmath52 has outflow conditions ( material leaving the grid ) ; likewise , outflow conditions exist for all @xmath7 zones except where the jets are injected . the outer boundary is far from the jet activity so negligible material leaves the grid there . we discuss the importance of the inner boundary sphere in section 4 . code units are transformed to physical units by choosing appropriate values for @xmath12 , @xmath35 , and @xmath13 . for instance , @xcite defined @xmath53 kpc , @xmath54 km s@xmath45 and @xmath55 g @xmath56 for a rich cluster and @xmath57 kpc , @xmath58 km s@xmath45 and @xmath59 g @xmath56 for a group or poor cluster . in the former scheme a code unit of time ( derived from the crossing time ) corresponds to 50 myr and in the latter 10 myr . in our runs , we vary @xmath12 and @xmath13 but fix @xmath35 ; a value of @xmath60 km s@xmath45 appears appropriate for xrgs based on temperatures derived from spectral fitting @xcite . a jet injected at @xmath61 would then have a physical speed between @xmath62 ( a lorentz factor of @xmath63 ) . however , as noted by @xcite , comparing classical and relativistic jet simulations requires careful matching of parameters , in particular the mass - energy density content of the jet . hence , the jet velocities chosen should not be taken directly as assumptions of true jet velocity . our runs were parallelized and used variety of processors . many of the runs were conducted on quad - core intel@xmath64 core@xmath65 @xmath66 and @xmath67 ghz workstations . we now outline our guiding strategy to determine whether x - shaped sources can result from the interaction of radio galaxy lobes with their environment . first , we only model powerful fr ii sources which produce strong back - flows . neither the physical origin of the fr i / ii dichotomy nor the differences between jets in radio loud and radio quiet sources are understood , but the higher luminosity fr iis exhibit the hot spots , well defined lobes , and bridges exploited by the backflow model . in accordance with the observations @xcite , we inject jets along the major axis of the surrounding atmosphere . we first use unrealistic atmospheres with very favorable pressure gradients for wing production ( as in * ? ? ? * ) , then explore jet and atmosphere parameters to study the production and characteristics of xrgs . in particular , we explore the dependence of wing formation on jet width , density , and kinetic luminosity as a function of time , and initial atmosphere parameters ( core radius , density , ellipticity , and position angle ) . although some parameter combinations are degenerate , this is a very large parameter space because the @xmath68 may include dead time and intermittency . compared to 2d modeling , our 3d simulations eliminate the requirement of axisymmetry which enhances the jet head advance speed @xcite and the coherence of the back - flows . the effect of turbulence is also more realistically explored in three dimensions . motivated by the expectation that pressure gradients affect the wings fundamentally the same way in different systems , we start from the ansatz that jet and atmospheric parameters are orthogonal . in other words , the jet parameters may be tuned in some fiducial atmosphere and the atmosphere parameters may be tuned with some fiducial jet such that the behavior of an arbitrary jet in an arbitrary atmosphere can be inferred . on the basis of this method we will evaluate the factors key to wing prominence and the viability of the backflow models . [ coevol ] if wings are distortions to a generic double - lobed source , we expect our simulated radio galaxies to strongly resemble the double - lobed sources produced by earlier models . hydrodynamic and mhd models of jets are commonly employed to study either the phenomenology of the jets and lobes ( with relativistic and nonrelativistic fluids ) or the energy deposited by the lobes into their environment . hence , a large body of work concerned with phenomenological models of these sources exists and has produced key insights into the life of a powerful radio source . these studies include work on early jet / lobe evolution in a relaxed atmosphere ( e.g. * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ) , the influence of the @xmath69 density contrast and internal mach number ( e.g. * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ) , jet stability in nonrelativistic and relativistic conditions ( e.g. * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ) , the importance of intermittency @xcite or intrinsically spreading out the jet thrust to slow the advance of simulated jets ( e.g. * ? ? ? * ) , the importance of the jet environment to morphology or energy deposition ( e.g. * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ) , and physics beyond mhd ( e.g. * ? ? ? naturally , there is overlap between the phenomenological studies and those motivated by the challenge to produce jets which prevent a cooling catastrophe in the icm of a host galaxy cluster by isotropizing energy distribution . the viability of radio galaxies as agn feedback mechanisms is beyond the scope of this work , but jet lifetime and the passive evolution of `` dead '' radio galaxies @xcite place important constraints on wing prominence . based on this work , we understand a powerful double - lobed source to have three distinct phases of evolution : ( i ) _ ignition _ , in which a spheroidal cocoon of relativistic plasma is formed around the nascent jets , ( ii ) the _ active phase _ , wherein the jet produces the cigar - shaped lobes associated with fr ii radio galaxies , and ( iii ) the _ passive phase _ where lobes evolve after the jet is turned off . below we outline these phases for a preliminary hydrodynamical simulation of a fast ( @xmath70 ) , light jet with large @xmath39 ( a `` fr ii '' source ) to provide a framework for discussing the evolution of winged sources ( left - hand panels of figure [ coevol ] ) . we note that @xcite have recently found good agreement between the structures observed in hydrodynamic simulations of hypersonic jets and laboratory experiment . [ [ ignition ] ] _ ignition _ + + + + + + + + + + the jet is injected in pressure equilibrium with the initially relaxed surrounding medium . the flow quickly forms and drives a spheroidal bow shock into the surrounding medium ( figure [ coevol ] , top left panel ) . at the location where the jet impacts the shock , back - flows develop which fill the space evacuated by the bow shock with light , hot spent jet plasma . this plasma forms a cocoon which sheaths the jet . at very early times the jet expands laterally , since it is unconfined by the cocoon plasma ( in part due to the initially conical shape of the jet ) and the expansion of the nascent radio galaxy is nearly self - similar @xcite . however , as a result , the early back - flows acquire a circulatory motion and flow along the inner edge of the bow shock ( figure [ backflow ] , top panel ) . by the time these flows reach the midplane between the two jets , they have velocity vectors pointing radially inwards and do not collide with back - flows from the counter - jet @xcite . in our models , the back - flows are also prevented from interacting with their counterparts from the counter - jet because our jets are injected into pristine atmospheres such that at very early times , each jet inflates its own cocoon . the two cocoons are both bounded by a bow shock , and the two shocks meet at the midplane between the jets and form an interstice of dense material that prevents early mixing ( figure [ backflow ] , top panel ) . whether such an interstice is present in real sources is not clear ( we do not resolve the very earliest jet stages such as the flood - and - channel phase seen in a clumpy , warm disk in * ? ? ? * ) , but the interstice is ablated and the cocoon is unified by the active phase . as the cocoon pressure builds due to backflow confined by the bow shocks , the jet becomes azimuthally confined and a recollimation shock appears near the injection point ; by the end of the ignition phase , the cocoon is strongly overpressured relative to its environment . at the same time , the terminal shock becomes increasingly distinct from the bow shock , and the jet head takes on the characteristic double - pronged appearance of a 3d hydrodynamical jet . while the back - flows still follow the bow shocks during the late ignition phase , they are increasingly straight . we note that this early evolution is seen in all our runs and does not depend much on atmosphere or jet parameters , nor on the boundary conditions ( as long as the core radius of the atmosphere @xmath12 is much larger than @xmath7 ) . [ [ active - phase ] ] _ active phase _ + + + + + + + + + + + + when the jet head overtakes and pierces the initial bow shocks ( driving a bow shock contiguous with the initial burst ; * ? ? ? * ) , the active phase begins and a classical radio galaxy develops , with a cigar - shaped cocoon , hot spots , bow shocks ( middle - left panels of figure [ coevol ] ) , and straight back - flows ( figure [ backflow ] , bottom panel ) . at this point , the cocoon ceases to be substantially overpressured and the cocoon s lateral expansion falls close to the sound speed of the ambient medium , lagging behind the bow shock ( the cocoon expands due to buoyancy , kelvin - helmholtz , and rayleigh - taylor instabilities ) . this weak shock ( @xmath71 ) sweeps up a large amount of material as it expands and becomes better described as a strong sound wave ( figure [ coevol ] ) . meanwhile , the jet develops internal oblique collimating shocks along its length , retaining a high velocity out to the terminal shock at the jet head ( i.e. the angular size of the jet decreases with increasing radius ) where the cocoon becomes momentum - driven . less powerful jets do not produce cocoons @xcite , but we focus on the cocoon - bounded case ( the cocoon pressure also depends on the internal mach number ; * ? ? ? [ [ passive - phase ] ] _ passive phase _ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + once the jets are turned off , the back - flows cease and the `` dead '' radio galaxy rises buoyantly in the atmosphere , lifting large amounts of material to great heights and mixing with the surrounding medium @xcite . although the radio galaxy is relatively efficient at depositing its energy irreversibly in the surrounding medium , it is difficult to isotropize this energy deposition on short enough timescales to avoid a cooling catastrophes ( e.g. * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? the cocoon separates into bubbles which pinch off along the direction of the jets and rise in opposite directions ; the evolution of these bubbles may be quite complex ( e.g. * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? this very late stage evolution is unlikely to be important for winged galaxy evolution , as winged galaxies appear to be related to sources with strong bridges @xcite , and is not shown in figure [ coevol ] . with the scheme described in section 2 , we produce winged radio galaxies by the deflection of backflow into channels perpendicular to the jets . in our models , wings are produced in strongly asymmetric atmospheres when the jet is driven near the major axis ; the wings are produced along the minor axis as cocoon material escapes the central regions of the atmosphere and evolve buoyantly , collimated by the surrounding stratified atmosphere which promotes expansion along the steepest pressure gradient . hence , these wings are similar to those produced by @xcite and @xcite . without introducing additional complexity to the atmosphere , hydrodynamic wings are formed in two stages . first , during the ignition phase ( section 2.3 ) , the overpressured cocoon expands faster along the minor axis due to the steeper pressure gradient and forms small channels ( proto - wings ) perpendicular to the jet into which back - flowing plasma flows . the proto - wings produced in this way can account for 2040% of wing length at the end of the active phase depending on the gradient . second , during the active phase , the wings rise buoyantly , fed by turbulent flows near the midplane . although the back - flows near the jet heads are initially laminar and supersonic ( relative to the lobe material ) , they quickly decelerate and do not enter the wings as coherent flows ; the wings expand subsonically . during the active phase the wings evolve almost independently of the cocoon . hence , once wings have developed , their length depends only on the properties of the native atmosphere whereas the length of the jet - fed primary lobes is dominated by the properties of the jet ( in particular the kinetic luminosity as a function of time ) for powerful jets . therefore , _ decaying _ jets produce prominent wings . in this section , we explore these ideas in detail , first comparing the life of a winged source to a canonical double - lobed one ( figure [ coevol ] ) and then looking at the dependence of wing prominence and longevity on various tunable parameters in our models . winged galaxies experience the same life stages outlined in section 2.3 . we describe how wings fit into this process in detail below , referencing our standard ( extremal ) atmosphere ( run standard , tables [ atmostable ] and [ jettable ] ) . while unrealistic , this atmosphere provides important insights into the backflow model and can be directly compared to prior work @xcite . [ [ ignition-1 ] ] _ ignition _ + + + + + + + + + + during the ignition phase of a winged source , the anisotropic expansion of the overpressured cocoon in an aspherical atmosphere produces channels which will later become the wings ( the proto - wings ) . this pressure - driven expansion is supersonic but brief , since the cocoon quickly reaches pressure equilibrium . although these channels need not be produced by an overpressured cocoon , some channels must exist for wings to form . the degree of cocoon expansion in a given direction depends on the pressure gradient experienced in that direction , and hence on the atmospheric parameters . in particular , the eccentricity of the atmosphere effectively changes the core radius @xmath12 seen by the cocoon in different directions . for example , along the @xmath28-axis ( @xmath72 ; the jet is driven along @xmath73 ) equation 4 gives : @xmath74 where @xmath75 as above . since the pressure gradient is steeper for smaller @xmath76 , higher ellipticity along other axes promotes wing expansion : for @xmath25 and @xmath77 , @xmath78 along the @xmath28-axis . conversely , if @xmath79 and @xmath80 ( the jet is pointed along the minor axis ) , @xmath81 and wings are suppressed . of course , wing expansion depends on the actual pressure gradients rather than just the ratio along different axes ; the base values @xmath12 and @xmath13 determine whether wings can form ( i.e. a highly elliptical atmosphere can have shallow pressure gradients along the minor axis if it is very large ) . note that at very small radii @xmath82 ( i.e. during the ignition phase ) , the pressure gradient steepens linearly with increasing @xmath4 and at large radii ( during the active phase , see below ) the pressure gradient becomes shallower as @xmath83 . hence , the ignition phase is the time at which atmospheric asymmetry has the strongest effect on the ultimate morphology of the source . and @xmath84 velocity vectors overlaid on density slices ( taken at @xmath85 ) at different times for the simulation tx_e75_ve3_b5.0 ( table 3 ) . we have chosen ( arbitrarily ) @xmath58 km s@xmath45 and @xmath86 kpc ( corresponding to a code @xmath87 ) to represent a large elliptical galaxy . white vectors point radially outwards and cyan vectors point radially inwards ( i.e. the back - flows ) . vectors are only shown when the magnitude of @xmath88 exceeds the sound speed of the lobe material ( @xmath89 ) . note that early on , the back - flows follow the contact discontinuity and are directed towards the inner boundary , but later become straight as in @xcite . ] -axes ; at @xmath90 in the left panels , a new jet is reinjected . _ negative _ growth for the lobes indicates collapse during the passive phase . ] [ [ active - phase-1 ] ] _ active phase _ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + once the cocoon has reached pressure equilibrium , the proto - wings are no longer pressure - driven . as the back - flows become straight , they merge and fill the channels ( figure [ backflow ] , bottom panel ) to form structures more closely resembling observed wings . however , the flows into the wings are turbulent and transonic or subsonic ( relative to the internal lobe sound speed @xmath89 ) . in other words , wings are not _ driven _ during the active phase . rather , because they are structures filled with light fluid , they rise buoyantly in the atmosphere , collimated by the stratified elliptical atmosphere . since the wings rise buoyantly , their growth rate is subsonic . to see this , it is instructive to look at the simplified case of a spherical bubble ( of fixed radius ) rising buoyantly in a dense fluid . the ( terminal ) buoyant velocity at a given height for such a bubble is @xmath91 where @xmath92 , @xmath93 , and @xmath94 are the volume , cross - sectional area , and radius of the bubble respectively , @xmath95 is the `` drag '' coefficient , and we have used the background dark matter potential @xmath32 to compute @xmath96 in terms of @xmath4 and effective core radius @xmath23 . naturally , this follows the pressure gradient ( equation 12 ) , so when the bubble is at very small radii its velocity _ increases _ as @xmath97 , whereas outside @xmath76 it _ decreases _ as @xmath83 . for typical values in our simulations , the peak value of @xmath98 is approximately @xmath35 . hence , in a highly elliptical atmosphere , a bubble rising along the minor axis will rise subsonically with decreasing velocity for most of its lifetime . our wings do not fit this simplified case because they are large relative to @xmath76 , variable in size , aspherical , and connected to the cocoon . nonetheless , their expansion is subsonic for the same reason : the wings exceed @xmath76 early on when their growth is pressure - driven rather than buoyant , and @xmath98 monotonically declines thereafter . this transition from supersonic to subsonic wing expansion is plainly seen in figure [ wingvel ] . therefore , wings in our models may not intrinsically exceed the length of the primary lobes unless the primary lobes advance at some average speed @xmath99 . since powerful jets are required to produce the proto - wings in an overpressured cocoon phase , prominent wings require decaying jets , intermittent jets , or jets which deposit their thrust over an increasingly large area with time . the profile of the fiducial run is shown along with its wing prominence in figure [ standardgrowth ] and compared to a triaxial atmosphere in figure [ wingvel ] . note that in the fiducial run ( left panel of figure [ wingvel ] ) the wings eventually overtake the lobes ( in part due to the collapse of the lobes when the jet is very weak ) , but clearly move into a subsonic regime early and remain there . the bow shock remains mildly supersonic through most of both simulations . in figure [ diffwings ] we show wings produced by decaying jets during the active phase in several environments ( the fiducial run is shown in the top row ) . [ [ passive - phase-1 ] ] _ passive phase _ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + once the jets are turned off , the cocoon disintegrates as the lobes either rise buoyantly as bubbles or collapse under the relaxing atmosphere . if the radio galaxy is within a few @xmath12 in a dense atmosphere , the fall - back of displaced material shreds the lobes into small bubbles . in either case , the wings pinch off and rise . these bubbles do not survive long , but their behavior might be substantially altered in the presence of magnetic fields ( e.g. * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? because observed winged sources have strong bridges , we expect them to be in the active phase . [ [ reinjection ] ] _ reinjection _ + + + + + + + + + + + + + a powerful jet reignited during the passive phase before the cocoon has disintegrated may significantly enhance the wings . if the old jet channel is somewhat broken up , the reinjected jet forms a new terminal shock and bow shocks _ inside _ the old cocoon . these new shocks do not form spheroidal structures ( as in a relaxed atmosphere ) but instead produce strong , straight back - flows near the midplane . hence , the wings receive a large influx of fresh supersonic plasma directly after reinjection ( figure [ coevol ] , bottom panels ) . this brightens the wings substantially and reinforces their structures . there is a relatively narrow window of time where this process is effective . if the reinjection occurs while the jet channels are largely intact ( i.e. during the active phase ) , the jet simply follows these channels . on the other hand , if the reinjection occurs when the wings have already separated from the lobes as individual bubbles , the new jet can not feed them . even if the reinjection occurs at the `` right '' time , the efficacy of the restarted jet at promoting wings is short - lived . however , this mechanism can produce wings that are intrinsically _ longer _ than the jet - driven lobes ( figure 3 , bottom panels ) . if the reinjected jet decays , this extreme axial ratio can be maintained for most of the lifetime of the restarted radio galaxy and a bona - fide x - shaped source results , although this source would only have the `` fr ii '' primary lobes for a short period of time ( @xmath100 myr for a source 40 kpc across ) . ( crosses ) in timestep intervals of @xmath101 for the standard simulation with a reinjection at @xmath90 . we have overplotted the velocity of the jet as the black line ( right @xmath102-axis ) . the roman numerals indicate ( i ) the overpressured cocoon phase , ( ii ) the active phase ( powerful jet ) , ( iii ) the active phase ( weak jet ) , ( iv ) the passive phase ( with cocoon collapse ) , ( v ) a second active phase due to the reinjected jet , and ( vi ) the second passive phase with further cocoon collapse . during cocoon collapse , the source does not resemble a winged source ( instead it is a `` dead '' radio galaxy ) . a source appears winged during the active phase when the jet is most like a weak fr ii or strong fr i. ] assuming equipartition ) of these sources . ] in section 3.1 , we describe the life stages of a winged radio source . we now describe the dependence of wing prominence on our tunable parameters . following the strategy laid out in section 2.2 , we begin with the fiducial simulation standard which is characterized by an atmosphere with a large ellipticity @xmath14 and a jet with a velocity profile @xmath103 $ ] ( figures [ coevol ] and [ wingvel ] ) . taking the jet from the fiducial run , we individually vary parameters in the atmosphere in order to see their influence on wings ( figure [ atmosplots ] , table [ atmostable ] ) , and then vary jet parameters in the fiducial atmosphere ( figure [ jetplots ] , table [ jettable ] ) . we then synthesize the information gleaned from these single - parameter curves to attempt to find atmospheres and jets which can explain real winged sources , including more complex behavior as well ( table [ synthesistable ] ) . all of the runs proceed to a code time of 1.0 or more , where most have entered the passive phase . reinjections , where used , occur near the beginning of the passive phase . to quantify wing prominence we use the wing - to - lobe axial ratio ( @xmath104 ) . this quantity is an imperfect measure because @xmath104 intrinsically varies with azimuthal angle @xmath6 and time , and observable sources are seen in projection so the observed @xmath104 will differ from the intrinsic value . @xmath104 is also essentially meaningless during ignition or the passive phase , but a source in one of these stages would not be classified as `` winged . '' for the parameter exploration in figures [ atmosplots ] and [ jetplots ] ( values in tables [ atmostable ] and [ jettable ] ) , we adopt as a fiducial value @xmath105 : the maximum intrinsic @xmath104 for any pair of azimuthal angles [ @xmath6,@xmath106 at a code time @xmath107 . for the standard jet ( @xmath103 $ ] ) , @xmath107 represents the transition from a powerful to weak jet in the active phase , and by this time the wings have begun to grow buoyantly . hence , a code time of @xmath107 is a reasonable place to measure the influence of the atmosphere on wings . we also use @xmath105 in varying the jet parameters , noting that while @xmath107 is no longer special , all of the runs in table [ jettable ] are in the active phase at this time . @xmath105 is not predictive of wing length later in the same simulation , but is a good measure of relative wing prominence between simulations due to the subsonic growth of wings . from figure [ atmosplots ] one can get a broad sense of the dependence of wing prominence on the size and shape of the atmosphere . it is immediately obvious that there is a strong dependence on the ellipticity @xmath14 of the atmosphere , and that smaller , denser atmospheres are the most conducive to wing formation ( although `` small '' could be physically quite large depending on the jet ) . it is also notable that relatively high values of @xmath104 can be achieved by @xmath107 ; because we use a decaying jet , the wings will only become more prominent during the later active phase . while these results are not surprising ( equation 12 ) , the particular form of the curves depends on both the jet and the atmosphere . as expected from @xcite and @xcite , long wings require jets co - aligned close to the major axis . the trends are less clear when varying jet parameters ( figure [ jetplots ] ) . in the top panels , the jet velocity is allowed to vary freely without conserving integrated kinetic luminosity between runs . if the jet is injected at constant velocity throughout the simulation ( figure [ jetplots]a ) , a faster jet is slightly better than a slower one at making wings . however , a decaying jet ( figure [ jetplots]b ) is better still , with pure exponential decay more effective at increasing @xmath105 than `` gaussian '' jets of the form @xmath108 $ ] . in the bottom panels of figure [ jetplots ] , we hold the kinetic luminosity constant between runs by modifying @xmath109 . from figure [ jetplots]c , it is evident that increasing the width of the jet ( at the cost of a slower jet ) is important . changing the density of the jet material has an extreme effect on @xmath105 ( figure [ jetplots]d ) ; above @xmath110 , the jet ceases to be `` light '' relative to the background and no longer forms lobes resembling radio galaxies @xcite . at very low densities , mixing becomes very efficient at disrupting the radio galaxy . we now discuss these results in detail , beginning with the properties of the fiducial run . lccccccc + + standard & y & 1.0 & 3.0 & 0.0 & 0.75 & 0.0 & 0.62 + + + + sj_e20 & n & 1.0 & 3.0 & 0.0 & 0.20 & 0.0 & 0.42 + sj_e30 & n & 1.0 & 3.0 & 0.0 & 0.30 & 0.0 & 0.43 + sj_e50 & n & 1.0 & 3.0 & 0.0 & 0.50 & 0.0 & 0.49 + sj_e60 & y & 1.0 & 3.0 & 0.0 & 0.60 & 0.0 & 0.54 + + + + sj_r0.5 & y & 0.5 & 3.0 & 0.0 & 0.75 & 0.0 & 0.73 + sj_r0.75 & y & 0.75 & 3.0 & 0.0 & 0.75 & 0.0 & 0.61 + sj_r2.0 & n & 2.0 & 3.0 & 0.0 & 0.75 & 0.0 & 0.45 + + + + sj_d1.5 & y & 1.0 & 1.5 & 0.0 & 0.75 & 0.0 & 0.52 + sj_d2.0 & y & 1.0 & 2.0 & 0.0 & 0.75 & 0.0 & 0.57 + sj_d4.0 & y & 1.0 & 4.0 & 0.0 & 0.75 & 0.0 & 0.65 + sj_d5.0 & y & 1.0 & 5.0 & 0.0 & 0.75 & 0.0 & 0.68 + + + + sj_pa5 & y & 1.0 & 3.0 & 0.0 & 0.75 & 5.0 & 0.62 + sj_pa10 & y & 1.0 & 3.0 & 0.0 & 0.75 & 10.0 & 0.60 + sj_pa15 & y & 1.0 & 3.0 & 0.0 & 0.75 & 15.0 & 0.58 + sj_pa20 & y & 1.0 & 3.0 & 0.0 & 0.75 & 20.0 & 0.51 + + + + tx_e75_1 & y & 1.0 & 3.0 & 0.375 & 0.75 & 0.0 & 0.65 + tx_e75_2 & y & 1.0 & 3.0 & 0.50 & 0.75 & 0.0 & 0.72 [ [ fiducial - run ] ] _ fiducial run _ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + our fiducial run ( standard , tables [ atmostable ] and [ jettable ] ) is the combination of our fiducial atmosphere ( @xmath26 , @xmath111 , @xmath112 , @xmath113 ) with our fiducial jet ( @xmath114 $ ] , @xmath115 , @xmath116 , aligned along the @xmath20-axis ) . like most of our runs , this simulation proceeds to a code time of @xmath117 , at which point the radio galaxy is in the early passive phase . unsurprisingly , this run produces some of the most prominent wings of our suite ( figure [ diffwings ] ) ; the shallow pressure gradient along the @xmath20-axis and declining velocity profile combine to produce stalled lobes which begin to collapse at the end of the active phase . at the same time , wings quickly escape the core region , and by @xmath118 are easily recognizable ( right - hand panels of figure [ coevol ] ) . after reaching @xmath119 at @xmath120 , the cocoon collapse leaves the wings as the most notable features ( figure [ standardgrowth ] ) . at @xmath90 , we re - inject a jet with @xmath121 $ ] ( figure [ standardgrowth ] and bottom panel of figure [ coevol ] ) . since the jet is expanding into tenuous material from the old cocoon , the expansion quickly re - establishes a cocoon . however , the reinjection also drives a bow shock inside the collapsing cocoon , allowing initially strong back - flows to feed the wings directly . hence , between @xmath122 and @xmath123 , an x - shaped radio galaxy is apparent ( @xmath124 ) . after @xmath123 , the jet again weakens to the point where collapse begins . if the jet is instead reinjected at the inception of the passive phase at @xmath125 , the end result is very similar ( @xmath124 at @xmath126 ) . on ( a ) the ellipticity of the atmosphere @xmath14 , ( b ) the core density @xmath13 , ( c ) the core radius @xmath12 , and ( d ) the angle between the jet and the major axis @xmath127 . each plot represents varying one parameter while holding the other standard atmosphere parameters ( @xmath128 , @xmath111 , @xmath26 , and @xmath129 ) steady and using the standard jet . in panel ( a ) the square and triangle represent runs with different @xmath130 for @xmath113 , demonstrating the effect of triaxiality on @xmath104 ( table [ atmostable ] ) . @xmath104 is measured at @xmath107 for all cases ; for the standard jet , this represents the transition during the active phase from a powerful to a weak jet ( this time and the `` wing threshold '' vary with choice of jet ) . values taken from table [ atmostable ] . ] the atmosphere in this run is similar to the 2d simulations presented in @xcite and 3d simulations in @xcite . striking asymmetries develop despite the axisymmetric atmosphere because of turbulent mixing between different slices in @xmath6 and because the back - flows form three - dimensional structures within the lobes . if these flows are slightly misaligned on opposite sides of the midplane , asymmetries develop . on ( a ) jet velocity for a constant - velocity jet , ( b ) e - folding time for a decaying jet ( diamonds represent jets of the form @xmath131 $ ] and triangles @xmath132 $ ] ) , ( c ) area of the jet nozzle , and ( d ) density of the jet material . all runs are conducted in the standard atmosphere ( table [ atmostable ] ) . in ( a ) and ( b ) , the jet kinetic luminosity is _ not _ conserved between runs , whereas in ( c ) and ( d ) we adjust the initial velocity @xmath109 to conserve @xmath39 . as in figure [ atmosplots ] , we show @xmath104 as measured at a code time @xmath107 ; all sources are in the active phase but not at the same place . ] [ [ atmosphere ] ] _ atmosphere _ + + + + + + + + + + + + in our exploration of different atmosphere properties ( figure [ atmosplots ] ; table [ atmostable ] ) , we vary @xmath14 , @xmath13 , @xmath12 , and @xmath127 individually while keeping the other atmosphere parameters steady and using the standard jet ( @xmath103 $ ] , @xmath133 , @xmath116 , and @xmath134 ) . except when we vary @xmath127 , the jet is coaligned with the major axis . it is clear from figure [ atmosplots ] that wing prominence depends strongly on the core radius @xmath12 , core density @xmath13 , and ellipticity @xmath14 . because the lobes and wings evolve almost independently , these dependencies can be understood by breaking the axial ratio @xmath104 into its constituent parts : the wing length @xmath135 and lobe length @xmath136 . for the purposes of this discussion , @xmath135 and @xmath136 are both taken to be measured at @xmath107 ( table [ atmostable ] ) . we find that @xmath136 varies only slightly as a function of @xmath12 ( less than 10% ) but does peak between @xmath137 and @xmath87 . at very low @xmath12 , the lobes are not confined by the atmosphere and spread out laterally , causing more turbulent mixing and dissipating the thrust of the jet . at very high @xmath12 , the lobes are completely confined by the atmosphere and the density gradient is so shallow that as the jet weakens it is increasingly resisted by the atmosphere . the importance of this effect on the lobes is more pronounced in a comparison between @xmath136 and @xmath13 where the lobe length declines by 50% between @xmath138 and @xmath139 . on the other hand , the wing length @xmath135 depends much more strongly on the core radius @xmath12 ( declining precipitously with increasing @xmath12 ) and only weakly on the core density . this behavior occurs because the wings respond primarily to the pressure gradient along the minor axis ( equation 12 ) which depends on @xmath12 and @xmath13 as @xmath140 . thus , a large @xmath104 requires small , dense atmospheres . in this context , the importance of ellipticity is clear : @xmath14 determines the ratio of core radii along the major and minor axes . for high @xmath14 , the lobes expand into material which does not vary much in density during the active phase whereas the wings quickly escape the core region . this behavior is unsurprising ; @xcite and @xcite make the same basic argument for wings produced when the jet is coaligned with the major axis of the atmosphere . however , the interplay between the parameters rules out predicting the wing length from first principles . for instance , one might imagine that we could produce wings in an atmosphere with @xmath141 ( figure [ atmosplots ] ) by making @xmath12 tiny and @xmath13 large . although this _ does _ increase the wing length , the radio galaxy expands beyond the dense part of the atmosphere during the ignition phase so the jet does not face as much resistance as might be expected . it is possible to produce wings in atmospheres with smaller @xmath14 by making the atmospheres triaxial ( using prolate ellipsoids ) instead of axisymmetric . @xcite expect triaxial atmospheres ( as opposed to the axisymmetric simulations of * ? ? ? * ) to produce longer wings because the backflow is collimated along a single minor axis as opposed to forming a torus at the midplane . we find that while a triaxial atmosphere does collimate the wings , it does not by itself make them substantially longer relative to an axisymmetric atmosphere with the same maximum @xmath14 because the backflow in our simulations is a compressible fluid and wing growth is driven by buoyancy ( the pressure gradient is the same along the minor axis ) . rather , triaxial atmospheres produce better - defined proto - wing channels during the ignition phase . these channels are then reinforced during the active phase . in other words , triaxiality increases @xmath105 at smaller values of @xmath14 because the ignition cocoon is less axisymmetric . finally , we test the sensitivity of wing formation to the degree of alignment between the jet and major axis @xmath127 ( figure [ atmosplots]d ) . long wings are difficult to produce when the jet is misaligned with the major axis , and the wings produced differ in character . this is because the ignition cocoon produces proto - wings perpendicular to the jet instead of along the atmosphere s minor axis . therefore , the longer wings which develop during the active phase do not benefit as much from the initial supersonic expansion . wings also become increasingly associated with the lobe on their side of the major axis as @xmath127 increases because the lobes are bent by the atmosphere and the back - flows no longer make it all the way to the midplane before flowing into the wings . hence , the lobe - wing pairs are mirror - symmetric about the midplane . the angle between the lobe and the wing in each pair is also largely determined by @xmath127 . lcclccc + + standard & y & 0.01 & @xmath142 $ ] & @xmath143 & @xmath144 & 0.62 + + + + sa_v30 & n & 0.01 & 30 & @xmath143 & @xmath144 & 0.39 + sa_v50 & y & 0.01 & 50 & @xmath143 & @xmath144 & 0.43 + sa_v80 & y & 0.01 & 80 & @xmath143 & @xmath144 & 0.44 + sa_v100 & y & 0.01 & 100 & @xmath143 & @xmath144 & 0.47 + sa_ve1 & y & 0.01 & @xmath145 $ ] & @xmath143 & @xmath144 & 0.48 + sa_ve6 & y & 0.01 & @xmath146 $ ] & @xmath143 & @xmath144 & 0.67 + sa_vg3 & y & 0.01 & @xmath147 $ ] & @xmath143 & @xmath144 & 0.47 + sa_vg6 & y & 0.01 & @xmath148 $ ] & @xmath143 & @xmath144 & 0.51 + + + + sa_d0.005 & y & 0.005 & @xmath149 $ ] & @xmath143 & @xmath144 & 0.73 + sa_d0.05 & n & 0.05 & @xmath149 $ ] & @xmath143 & @xmath144 & 0.19 + sa_d0.10 & n & 0.10 & @xmath149 $ ] & @xmath143 & @xmath144 & 0.09 + + + + sa_b30 & y & 0.01 & @xmath149 $ ] & @xmath143 & @xmath150 & 0.51 + sa_b7.5 & y & 0.01 & @xmath149 $ ] & @xmath143 & @xmath151 & 0.76 + sa_b5.0 & y & 0.01 & @xmath149 $ ] & @xmath143 & @xmath152 & 0.87 [ [ jet ] ] _ jet _ + + + + + in contrast to the atmosphere parameter exploration , determining the dependence of @xmath105 on the character of the jet is difficult because of the potential for time dependence in the jet power . this time dependence , along with the small width of the jets , also makes it more difficult to test our findings observationally . we insist that the jets be light , hypersonic flows ( section 2 ) which produce sources which resemble double - lobed radio galaxies , and within these constraints test the dependence of @xmath105 on jet power as a function of time , jet width , and density of jet material ( figure [ jetplots ] ) . for each of the simulations in figure [ jetplots ] we use the standard atmosphere with @xmath26 , @xmath111 , @xmath128 , and @xmath153 . note that figures [ jetplots]a and figures [ jetplots]b do _ not _ conserve kinetic luminosity between runs , whereas figures [ jetplots]c and figures [ jetplots]d do . the exploration of jet velocity is conducted with jets with the standard width of @xmath134 ( @xmath154 code units wide ) and density of @xmath133 . figures [ jetplots]a and [ jetplots]b demonstrate the importance of decaying jets to long wings . in figure [ jetplots]a , we use jets with differing velocities but no time dependence , finding that none produce a large @xmath105 . @xmath105 actually _ increases _ with increasing @xmath40 even though the faster jets also punch through the atmosphere more quickly . this is because the overpressured cocoon produced by a weaker jet during the ignition phase is less overpressured and thus produces smaller proto - wings . below @xmath155 , the sources are not cocoon - bounded at all . since the jets do not decay , @xmath104 obviously decreases with time . powerful jets which decay ( figure [ jetplots]b ) are effective at producing wings because the proto - wings form during the ignition phase and the jet generates strong back - flows early on when the jet head is close to the midplane . since the lobes grow increasingly slowly , the subsonically expanding wings keep pace with the active lobes more easily . as is clear in figure [ jetplots]b , the slower the decay , the smaller @xmath105 ( diamonds represent exponentially decaying jets and triangles jets with @xmath108 $ ] ) . jets with _ increasing _ velocity do not produce long wings because a powerful jet is necessary at the inception of activity to produce proto - wings . in figures [ jetplots]c and figures [ jetplots]d we investigate the dependence of @xmath105 on jet width and density . we vary @xmath9 and @xmath41 while conserving @xmath39 by varying the initial velocity of the jet @xmath109 , using the standard form of @xmath156 $ ] . we limit these runs to those with @xmath109 capable of producing an overpressured cocoon that seeds proto - wings . the nozzle width of the jet clearly has a strong effect on @xmath105 ( figure [ jetplots]c ) . increasing the jet width makes the ignition cocoon larger and more overpressured during the ignition phase , promoting expansion along the minor axis . the lobe width during the active phase increases with increasing @xmath9 , dissipating the jet thrust over a larger solid angle . short , fat lobes attached to fat wings result . on the other hand , if @xmath9 is tiny , the jet drills through the surrounding atmosphere quickly , and thin , long lobes result . it is not clear whether jet widths actually vary substantially between sources and what determines the width of the jet ; all jets are very narrow . thus , our results are more generally a statement that jets which dissipate their thrust over a wider area produce longer wings . figure [ jetplots]d shows @xmath105 as a function of @xmath41 . the sharp decline with increasing @xmath41 is due to the thrust carried by the jet . even at moderate velocities , denser material drives the lobes forward much faster than light material while at the same time driving weaker back - flows . hence , wing formation is not favored . we note that when @xmath157 , the sound speed of the lobe material is not much greater than that of the ambient medium and the jet does not develop the usual kh instabilities . these jets are therefore not `` light '' as required to reproduce realistic radio sources with non - relativistic hydrodynamics ( section 2 ) . however , these runs are shown along with the light ones to illustrate the importance of dissipating jet thrust to long wings . lccccclccc[t ] + + wide_ve1 & 1.5 & 4.0 & 0.0 & 0.75 & 0.01 & @xmath145 $ ] & @xmath158 & @xmath151 & 0.58 + wide_ve3 & 1.5 & 4.0 & 0.0 & 0.75 & 0.01 & @xmath142 $ ] & @xmath158 & @xmath151 & 0.73 + tx_e75_ve1 & 1.0 & 3.0 & 0.375 & 0.75 & 0.01 & @xmath145 $ ] & @xmath158 & @xmath151 & 0.63 + tx_e75_ve1_big & 1.5 & 4.0 & 0.375 & 0.75 & 0.01 & @xmath145 $ ] & @xmath158 & @xmath151 & 0.68 + ( restart at @xmath159 ) & & & & & & & & & 0.78 + tx_e75_ve1_b7.5 & 0.75 & 3.0 & 0.375 & 0.75 & 0.01 & @xmath145 $ ] & @xmath158 & @xmath151 & 1.02 + tx_e75_ve3_b5.0 & 1.5 & 4.0 & 0.375 & 0.75 & 0.01 & @xmath142 $ ] & @xmath158 & @xmath160 & 0.82 + tx_e60 & 0.75 & 3.0 & 0.30 & 0.60 & 0.01 & @xmath145 $ ] & @xmath158 & @xmath151 & 0.44 + tx_e60_wide & 0.75 & 3.0 & 0.30 & 0.60 & 0.01 & @xmath145 $ ] & @xmath158 & @xmath160 & 0.67 + ( restart at @xmath159 ) & & & & & & & & & 0.97 + tx_e60_d5.0 & 0.75 & 5.0 & 0.30 & 0.60 & 0.01 & @xmath145 $ ] & @xmath158 & @xmath151 & 0.71 + tx_e45_d5.0_wide & 0.75 & 5.0 & 0.225 & 0.45 & 0.01 & @xmath142 $ ] & @xmath158 & @xmath160 & 0.58 + + + + disk_ve1 & 2.0 & 3.0 & 0.25 & 0.50 & 0.01 & @xmath145 $ ] & @xmath158 & @xmath151 & 0.60 + & 0.25 & 8.0 & 0.0 & 0.90 & & & & & + disk_ve3 & 2.0 & 3.0 & 0.25 & 0.50 & 0.01 & @xmath142 $ ] & @xmath158 & @xmath151 & 0.83 + & 0.25 & 8.0 & 0.0 & 0.90 & & & & & + turbulent & 1.0 & 3.0 & 0.0 & 0.75 & 0.01 & @xmath142 $ ] & @xmath158 & @xmath151 & 0.64 + shell_ve1 & 1.0 & 3.0 & 0.0 & 0.75 & 0.01 & @xmath145 $ ] & @xmath158 & @xmath151 & 0.53 + shell_ve3 & 1.0 & 3.0 & 0.0 & 0.75 & 0.01 & @xmath142 $ ] & @xmath158 & @xmath151 & 0.71 + intermittent & 2.0 & 2.0 & 0.0 & 0.75 & 0.01 & @xmath161 $ ] & @xmath158 & @xmath151 & 0.44 + intermittent2 & 1.0 & 3.0 & 0.0 & 0.75 & 0.01 & @xmath162 $ ] & @xmath158 & @xmath151 & 0.47 + slow_start_1 & 1.0 & 1.5 & 0.0 & 0.75 & 0.01 & @xmath163 _ to _ & @xmath158 & @xmath151 & 0.42 + & & & & & & @xmath145 $ ] & & & + slow_start_2 & 1.0 & 1.5 & 0.0 & 0.75 & 0.01 & @xmath163 _ to _ & @xmath158 & @xmath160 & 0.45 + & & & & & & @xmath145 $ ] & & & + slow_start_3 & 1.0 & 5.0 & 0.0 & 0.75 & 0.01 & @xmath163 _ to _ & @xmath158 & @xmath160 & 0.55 + & & & & & & @xmath145 $ ] & & & [ [ synthesis - runs ] ] _ synthesis runs _ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + we have used the insights gained from examining the dependence of wing prominence on various atmosphere and jet parameters to new runs with complex atmospheres and jets in an attempt to produce long , realistic wings . these simulations ( listed in table [ synthesistable ] ) are not a systematic exploration of any phenomenon . we offer a few brief observations here . triaxial atmospheres offer the best hope of making long wings at lower @xmath14 ( e.g. figure [ diffwings ] ) , but still can not produce substantial wings in our simulations for @xmath164 . several runs from a large suite of such simulations are listed in table [ synthesistable ] with the prefix tx . generally , they follow the same trends as described in above ; the importance of both favorable atmosphere and jet parameters to wings is obvious in the simulation with @xmath165 ( tx_e45_d5.0_wide ) , where a wide , decaying jet in a small , dense atmosphere is required to produce wings comparable to that in the standard atmosphere at lower ellipticity . embedded disks of hot material ( i.e. a thick disk ; runs disk_ve1 and disk_ve3 ) , however , alleviate the problem , allowing prominent wings to grow in atmospheres with globally small @xmath14 . these disks are somewhat denser than the larger ism , so the ignition cocoon effectively encounters a small , dense , highly elliptical atmosphere during the ignition stage . the disks are blown apart by the blast wave from the ignition stage and might not be observable once the radio galaxy has turned on . in most of our models , the ignition stage occurs in a smooth , relaxed medium . in real galaxies , the ignition stage would occur in the galactic center where mergers , dynamical effects , and other phenomena associated with agn can significantly disturb the ism . we do not attempt to model real galaxies , but find that adding kolmogorov spectrum turbulence to our atmospheres or small bar - like perturbations to the underlying gravitational potential near the nucleus does not have a large effect on the ignition stage . as long as there is a sufficient amount of ism distributed around the nucleus , an overpressured cocoon can form . on the other hand , in runs where we begin with a weak jet of @xmath166 ( twice the sound speed of the lobe material ) , and no cocoon is formed , wings do not form ( the slow_start runs in table [ synthesistable ] ) . the backflow model has difficulty producing wings when a weak agn suddenly becomes more powerful because an overpressured cocoon only forms when the jet is completely confined by the atmosphere . these runs can , however , produce something akin to z - shaped morphology by virtue of the lobes escaping the densest regions of the atmosphere before the powerful jet turns on . we have briefly investigated the potential for gas - rich `` stellar shells '' from minor mergers located periodically along the major axis to produce wings ( motivated by * ? ? ? we use a simple model in which only the positive peaks of two - dimensional sine / sinc waves are added to the density of an underlying elliptical atmosphere ; the center is cut out . the amplitudes are set at a maximum of @xmath13 . the shells do not significantly impact the formation of wings emanating from the center of the galaxy , although they do resist the jet , allowing for a higher @xmath104 ( the shell runs in table [ synthesistable ] ) . in the model of @xcite , wings are instead produced near the site of the shell , and we can not reproduce this . obviously , these runs are not a thorough exploration of the effect of stellar shells , especially if they actually bend jets ( in which case they are beyond the scope of our models ) . motivated by the importance of a reinjected jet ( section 3.1 ) , we examine the role of rapid intermittency ( runs intermittent in table [ synthesistable ] ) . by this we mean jets which experience multiple outbursts during the run and which are essentially in an `` on '' state or an `` off '' state . generally , we find that rapid intermittency has the effect of suppressing wing formation and results in much more regular cocoons ( in terms of their projected morphology ) than single outbursts . on the other hand , ragged cocoons are produced by long periods of dead time . in neither case are wings promoted , as each successive brief outburst deposits most of its thrust at the ends of the lobes , far from the midplane . the chief reason why such intermittency does not produce prominent wings is that wings expand subsonically . since the duty cycles of the intermittent jets are much shorter than the crossing time , the cocoon expands as if a moderately powerful jet of constant velocity were powering it . unlike in single decaying outbursts , the intermittent jets deposit most of their thrust far from the midplane . on the other hand , intermittency on the timescale of an @xmath167-folding time of a decaying jet can be effective . because we have only solved the equations of hydrodynamics in evolving our simple models , it is worth considering the impact of additional complexity . our models do not include magnetic fields , special relativity , or radiative losses , and our simple setup does not take into account complex jet or atmospheric structure , feedback , and other processes that may be important to radio galaxy morphology . in practice , we do not believe these omissions invalidate our results . for example , special relativity and magnetic fields must play crucial roles in determining the character and transverse structure of the jet , but we only insist that our simulated jets reproduce the collimation , hot spots , and back - flows of fr ii sources . in other respects ( e.g. radiative efficiency ) , the jet and agn are inside a `` black box . '' because we are concerned with the behavior of lobe material , we believe these omissions are justified . likewise , radiative losses ( depleting of lobe energy via synchrotron emission and inverse compton scattering ) only become important relative to adiabatic losses at late times and are not in a position to influence the formation of wings . radiative losses from the icm are also irrelevant on the timescales of agn outbursts , so feedback ( the connection of jet power to the amount of material crossing the inner boundary ) resulting from cluster cooling is unimportant on these timescales . as to feedback from _ backflow _ @xcite , there is no obvious recipe to describe what happens to the mass flowing across the inner boundary , since the inner boundary radius is much larger than the nuclear engine , but as the back - flows straighten , less material will have velocity vectors pointing towards the origin and eventually the agn would cease to be `` fed '' by backflow . this is consistent with our entirely artificial recipe for decaying jets . on the other hand , magnetic fields ( that must be injected with the jet ) and relativistic jets ( which have a higher thrust for a given mass - energy density ) may strongly influence the behavior of lobe material . toroidal magnetic fields may help collimate the backflow and retard its mixing ( e.g. * ? ? ? the apparent continuity of fields in some wings ( e.g. ngc 326 in * ? ? ? * ) is suggestive , especially considering that in our models the lack of collimation leads to wide wings . however , @xcite find in simulations of fr ii sources that turbulence sets in within the cocoon even when ordered fields existed earlier , so it is unclear that the magnetic fields in the wings are actually toroidal . as to the realism of the _ jet _ , it is not our goal to understand the jet physics in detail , but we note the persistence of experimental hypersonic fluid jets in recent work by @xcite , which the authors use to argue that magnetic collimation is only required near the base of the jet . the importance of relativistic jets to the cocooon morphology is unclear . @xcite find that , for jets matched by velocity , pressure , radius and power , relativistic jets produce preferentially wider cocoons than classical ones . the authors suggest that this effect may be accounted for by the higher thrust in the relativistic case . however , @xcite find the opposite when using the same matching conditions : relativistic jets tend to produce narrower cocoons compared to classical jets ( more specifically , jets with a higher lorentz factor have smaller cocoons ) . without matched relativistic simulations it is impossible to directly test the importance of special relativity on our cocoon sizes , but it is remarkable that @xcite and @xcite agree that the qualitative nature of the cocoon is unchanged . including relativity may modify @xmath104 but would not fundamentally change the appearance of our winged sources because relativistic physics in the lobes would not change the processes which produce wings . in other words , we believe that special relativity is a second - order effect akin to magnetic fields . it is worth asking whether wings form only because our atmospheres are `` smooth '' , i.e. because we have not included turbulence in the icm or structure near the center ( where the environment is presumably complex ) . this question is particularly important given the observed interactions between jets and molecular clouds ( e.g. * ? ? ? * ) , stellar shells ( e.g. * ? ? ? * ) , gas in companion galaxies @xcite , and more generally the complex nuclear environments of active galaxies ( e.g. * ? ? ? to this end , we have introduced density perturbations mimicking stellar shells along the major axis at various intervals , tested the impact of a single ring near the nucleus , and introduced kolmogorov - spectrum turbulence to the icm . none of these structures alter the same basic evolution of winged sources . additional jet physics would need to be in place in order to determine whether the jet itself can be bent by interaction with high density pockets @xcite . all of these tests use density perturbations with a maximum amplitude of the core density @xmath13 . finally , bulk flows in clusters are clearly important to radio galaxy structure @xcite , although most xrgs are large , strongly bridged sources in which this may not be a defining effect . it is encouraging that our simulated radio galaxies reproduce the basic features of other simulations in the literature ( e.g. * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ) , but it is worth considering the impact of boundary conditions and the jet structure on the morphology of the lobes our setup is designed to produce lobes like those of radio galaxies with physics and conditions inherently different from those encountered in nature . the mixing experienced by the lobes is also artificial ( naturally set by the size of the grid zones , which vary along @xmath4 and @xmath5 ) , but mixing is too slow a process to suppress the formation of wings . the inner boundary is the most significant artifact of our simulation because it represents no physical analog but rather allows us to hide the agn and the jet collimation mechanism . in addition , backflow crossing the boundary slows down and disappears . this has two consequences : not all the backflow can be harnessed , and flows may be effectively directed around the boundary by eddies as slowing backflow crosses the boundary . in the first case , the amount of material is to small to influence the wings . in the second , we find that the inner boundary must be small compared to @xmath12 ( keeping the physical size of the jets fixed ) in order to prevent the initial cocoon from being unduly influenced by the sphere . inner boundary spheres which are too large tend to promote material flowing around them , hence promoting early wings , but suppress midplane mergers and hence the prominence of later wings . the initial interstices also survive for longer for oversized @xmath7 . for typical atmospheres ( @xmath168 ) , @xmath7 must be somewhat smaller than 0.1 code units ; @xmath49 is a compromise between a small impact on the initial cocoon and reasonably sized grid zones . runs with @xmath169 do not appear substantially different from those with @xmath49 , and the timestep is unreasonably small . we precess the jet injection footpoints rapidly ( @xmath44 hz ) in a very tight circle around the poles in order to break up the jet symmetry and spread its thrust out over a larger working surface . we only require that our jet reproduce internal features seen in other hydrodynamic simulations along with the terminal shocks that give rise to the back - flows and lobes . without breaking up the jets , the jet head travels very quickly and produces unrealistic lobes ( e.g. * ? ? ? * ) ; in mhd simulations we would expect helical instabilities to break up the jet . our precession scheme is thus an artifice that is motivated by observables but whose recipe is not an attempt to model a physical process ( c.f . however , one might worry about its influence on backflow and wings because the precession angle is a free parameter ( subject to the condition that @xmath43 ) . in other words , we can tune the width of the lobes and the rate of growth of the radio galaxy within some narrow range of parameters . since stalling the jet head contributes to wing prominence via shortening the active lobes , is the axial ratio @xmath104 artificially high ? we do not believe so . even with tiny precession angles , we form long wings in highly eccentric atmospheres ( the only atmospheres where long wings form ) . moreover , the jet head advance speed also depends on the kinetic luminosity as a function of time . we have successfully produced winged and x - shaped sources solely by redirecting back - flow with static environmental pressure gradients , and are now in a position to compare our simulated sources to observed xrgs ( figure [ gallery ] ) in order to critique proposed wing formation mechanisms involving back - flows . in these models , wings are produced as plasma flowing back from the jet heads is deflected into a direction misaligned with the jets . how this deflection occurs is uncertain @xcite , and until now the backflow model has not been rigorously investigated with three - dimensional simulations . here we outline a series of predictions ( expectations ) for properties which are , at least in principle , observable if our simulations are an adequate representation of wing formation . these predictions are also summarized in table [ predictions ] . we then assess the backflow model in light of these predictions and briefly discuss the implications of our work for the wider sample of distortions to the canonical double - lobed morphology of bridged radio galaxies . [ [ x - shaped - and - winged - sources - are - one - family ] ] _ x - shaped and winged sources are one family _ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + the most natural consequence of the backflow model is that short and long wings are produced in the same way . short wings should then be more common than long ones since the long wings are harder to produce . although this is an obvious point , we note it as a potential observational test because sources with shorter wings and the candidate x - shaped sources @xcite have not been tested for several of the trends seen in xrgs ( most importantly , the jet major axis correlation * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? our simulated sources predict that winged sources will fall in line , albeit with a greater spread in parameter space . llll 1 . & short wings common ; ( intrinsically ) long & no in ss09 sample & ss09 + & wings rare & ( yes including c07 ? ) & + 2 . & projection tends to enhance @xmath104 & undetermined & + 3 . & @xmath104 correlated with @xmath170 & sample size too small & hk10 + & ( weaker correlation with host @xmath14 ) & no ? & c02,ss09 + 4 . & wings require a jet aligned near & yes & c02,ss09,hk10 + & the major axis & & + 5 . & @xmath104 enhanced by higher pressure , & yes ? & l10 + & small atmospheres & yes ? & ss09 + 6 . & most xrgs should be weak fr iis & yes & c09,l10 + & ( and hence strongly bridged sources ) & yes & lw84 + 7 . & intermittency on scales of 310 myr & undetermined & + & produces longer wings & & + 8 . & wings are fainter than lobes & yes & lw84 + 9 . & wings have flat spectral indices & mixed results & lr07 + 10 . & backflow follows existing channels & yes ? & ss09 + & ( collimation requires existing channels ) & & + 11 . & wings grow subsonically & no ? ( large wings ) & + & ( hence wing agn outbursts are old ) & no ? & dt02 + 12 . & flow speeds in wings should be & undetermined & + & transonic for lobe material & & + & backflow model piggybacks on other hydrodynamic & yes ? & ss09 + & models & & [ [ projection - almost - always - enhances - wl ] ] _ projection almost always enhances @xmath104 _ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + wings in our models ( even those produced by triaxial atmospheres ) tend to be wider than the lobes and hold their shape better in rotation and projection . hence , we predict that projection almost always enhances @xmath104 . in other words , some observed sources with high @xmath171 probably have an intrinsically smaller aspect ratio ( e.g. figure [ gallery ] ) . if the projection angle can be worked out for a sufficient number of xrgs and winged sources , we expect the lobes in a number of xrgs to be shortened via projection , i.e. the intrinsic distribution of @xmath104 is shifted from the observed distribution ( an idea of the observed distribution may be found in * ? ? ? if this does not turn out to be the case , the backflow model would need a collimation mechanism ( see subsonic expansion below ) to be consistent with observations . unfortunately , this prediction makes it difficult to quantitatively compare the simulated population to the observed on because in most xrgs the projection angle is unknown . [ [ long - wings - require - high - ellipticity ] ] _ long wings require high ellipticity _ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + our simulations predict that intrinsically long wings can only be produced in very elliptical atmospheres ( figure [ atmosplots ] ) . the lowest @xmath14 for which we can make convincing wings is @xmath172 , and very long wings require @xmath173 . these values are much higher than the average powerful radio galaxy host ( @xmath174 ; * ? ? ? * ) and even most xrgs . a high initial atmospheric ellipticity ( or higher order asymmetry ) is a clear prediction of our models , but confirming this behavior in observed sources is difficult . for instance , a few sources with very small host @xmath14 and large @xmath104 ( the best example is ngc 326 ) appear to have wings originating _ outside _ the ism , so it is not evident that the ellipticity of the ism is always the relevant value for comparison . further , the ellipticity of the ism may differ substantially from that of the host galaxy on small scales @xcite even when in broad agreement on galactic scales @xcite . in this case , the best example in the literature is 3c 403 ( figure [ 3c403 ] , where @xmath175 and @xmath176 @xcite . indeed , we find that elliptical atmospheres of moderate @xmath14 with embedded disks are as effective at producing wings as single - component atmospheres with extreme @xmath14 , but the disks are largely destroyed by the radio galaxy . high resolution imaging may be required to see any disk remnants . the triaxiality of elliptical galaxies also plays a role , since we may not measure a true ellipticity . finally , because projection tends to enhance @xmath104 , extreme values of @xmath177 ( as we use in the standard atmosphere ) are not required to produce observed long wings . all else being equal , we still expect the intrinsic @xmath104 to be correlated with @xmath14 , but the caveats outlined above make it a difficult proposal to test presently . [ [ wings - require - a - jet - pointed - nearly - along - the - major - axis - of - an - anisotropic - environment - delta - textpa - sim-0 ] ] _ wings require a jet pointed nearly along the major axis of an anisotropic environment ( @xmath178 ) _ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + as expected ( based on the studies in * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ) , wings require a strongly asymmetric environment in which the jet is stalled by progression along the long axis ( figure [ atmosplots ] ) . the wings grow in the favorable pressure gradients along the minor axis or axes . our models expect a fairly strict requirement for the jet to be within @xmath179 of the major axis for substantial wings to be produced via the overpressured cocoon channel ( the usual method for seeding wings in our models ) . the requirement is even more stringent in the event that a disk is present , indicating that disks are likely to be important only in a minority of cases . as @xmath127 increases , the wings become shorter ( figure [ atmosplots ] ) as well as increasingly associated with the lobe on the same side of the major axis . these lobe - wing pairs thus have mirror symmetry about the midplane . this is in agreement with radio maps of such sources . since wings long enough to qualify the source as `` winged '' can be produced for a @xmath179 range of major axis jet separation and truly x - shaped sources are only ( intrinsically ) produced for @xmath180 , we would expect @xmath181 of winged sources to have lobe - wing pairs , with acute angles between a lobe and its wing produced for smaller angles and obtuse angles for larger ones . thus , we suggest that the existence of a large number of sources with lobe - wing pairs rather than true x - shaped morphology is consistent with the backflow model . however , we would also expect that wing length would decrease with increasing @xmath127 ; this has not yet been measured . [ [ longer - wings - are - produced - in - higher - pressure - smaller - atmospheres ] ] _ longer wings are produced in higher pressure , smaller atmospheres _ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + steeper pressure gradients occur for smaller core radius and higher core density / pressure ( equation 12 ) . since the steepness of the pressure gradient influences the rate at which wings grow , these small , dense atmospheres ( e.g. the ism ) are better at producing wings . moreover , wings can only form via the overpressured cocoon channel if the cocoon can escape the central core region and its high density before it comes into pressure equilibrium . the top panels of figure [ coevol ] demonstrate this point ( see also figure [ atmosplots ] ) . finally , a high core density also resists the jet advance along the major axis , allowing the wings to grow longer . thus , our models expect that the hosts of xrgs ( where the jet is presumably pointed along the major axis ) have higher pressure , on average , than those normal radio galaxies with jet geometry favorable to wings . @xcite find that the nuclear regions of xrgs have high temperatures ( @xmath182 k ) indicating that these regions may be overpressured . although this does not directly correspond to our models of relaxed , isothermal atmospheres , our requirement for a small , high pressure environment is in agreement with their work . [ [ most - xrgs - should - be - weak - friis ] ] _ most xrgs should be weak fr iis _ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + another key ingredient in our models is a decaying jet that begins as a powerful fr ii source and decays to luminosities more typical of fr i sources . a powerful jet is required to produce the overpressured cocoon and drive wings early on , whereas once wings begin expanding subsonically , a weakening jet ( which advances increasingly slowly along the major axis of the atmosphere ) allows the wings to become quite prominent . if the atmosphere is much smaller than the radio galaxy ( as in many cases ) , a decaying jet will still grow more and more slowly , allowing subsonically growing wings to keep up . this finding naturally explains the observations that xrg radio powers tend to lie near the fr i / ii `` break '' @xcite while also possessing strong bridges associated with powerful fr ii sources @xcite . @xcite argue that xrgs are the archetypal transition population between fr i and fr ii sources , with about half the xrgs in their sample having weak emission lines from the agn ( weak - lined fr iis are otherwise uncommon ) . this suggests that there is indeed an evolutionary progression in the agn and jet luminosity of xrgs . our models predict a fast - rise exponential - decay profile in which the xrg spends most of its lifetime as a weak fr ii source ( figure [ jetplots ] ) . however , we note that @xcite find in an sdss study that fr i and ii sources are not as obviously separated as in @xcite and that fr ii morphology occurs for a variety of radio powers and host galaxy masses . intermittency is another important prediction of our models for observed xrgs , but the action of intermittency in our simulations may represent a more complex underlying process . intermittency on timescales similar to the @xmath167-folding time of a decaying jet ( near the early passive phase ) is effective in our simulations because it allows the jet to bypass the overpressured cocoon stage and form a bow shock within the radio lobe itself , thereby depositing a large amount of backflow into the wings from a very powerful jet close to the wing bases . reinjection is effective in a relatively narrow window of time ( 310 myr depending on the size of the radio galaxy , e.g. figure [ standardgrowth ] ) between the active and passive phases , but this may be plausible : the ripples in the perseus cluster @xcite and abell 2052 @xcite do imply an agn duty cycle of about 10 myr . this is consistent with our simulated sources between 50100 kpc across . thus , it is conceivable that regular intermittency is a viable mechanism for enhancing wings , although we note that if the intermittency is very rapid or very slow , it is ineffective ( section 3.2 ) . on the other hand , intermittency could be replaced in our models by any mechanism which drives back - flows nearer the base of the wings such as the motion of denser ism into the path of the jet . we note that intermittency may also be effective for wings attached to the primary lobes farther from the nucleus ; a reinjected jet quickly re - establishes the cocoon and drives strong back - flows along its length as it rapidly reaches the prior hot spot . if the jet reinjected is similar to the outburst which initially formed the wings , we would still expect xrgs mostly to be weak fr ii sources . [ [ wings - should - be - fainter - than - the - primary - lobes ] ] _ wings should be fainter than the primary lobes _ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + the active lobes of xrgs are typically brighter than the wings . this behavior persists at lower ( mhz ) frequencies and is therefore not obviously attributable to spectral ageing , although spectral ageing may be in play for some xrgs @xcite . our models expect the wings to be fainter because they are substantially wider than the collimated primary lobes yet contain ( in most cases ) less lobe material . we therefore suppose that the wing material spreads out and decreases the magnetic field energy density @xmath183 . assuming that @xmath183 decreases with increasing volume ( i.e. assuming something like equipartition conditions , although precise equipartition is not required ) , the synchrotron emissivity in the wings will be substantially smaller than that in the lobes . in other words , `` spherical '' wings a factor of @xmath184 wider than the active lobes will have a factor of @xmath185 smaller @xmath183 than in the lobes . in optically thin conditions ( a good assumption ) , the surface brightness obtained from integrating through the wings only recovers a factor of @xmath184 in the wings , so we expect them to be a factor of @xmath186 dimmer than the active lobes ( more generally , the square of the ratio between the wing width and the lobe width ) for electrons of the same @xmath187 . of course , in projection the wings may appear even dimmer since the lobes will tend to be shortened and therefore increase in surface brightness ( ignoring relativistic dimming of the counterjet ) whereas the wings will not . clearly , this prediction rests on a number of assumptions not included in our models and is therefore somewhat weak . since the wings are filled with turbulent plasma , it is also possible that the magnetic field strength is increased by winding up of fields as the material mixes . moreover , the jet power ( and therefore the back - flow speed ) is time dependent in our simulations , so the ratio between the surface brightness of the lobes and the wings would be time dependent in our model as well . nonetheless , the diffusion of material in the wings and the aforementioned projection effects seem likely to dim the wings in the backflow model . [ [ backflow - follows - existing - channels ] ] _ backflow follows existing channels _ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + most of the wings in our simulated sources are seeded by the pressure - driven expansion of an overpressured cocoon early in the source s life . this cocoon expands asymmetrically because of the asymmetric pressure gradients and forms proto - wings which are later bolstered by the merger of laminar back - flows near the midplane sending material into the wings during the active phase . the laminar back - flows themselves are ineffective at drilling new channels . during the overpressured phase they acquire a vorticity near the terminal shocks that leads them to follow the contact discontinuity of the cocoon and ultimately flow back towards the agn ( figure [ backflow ] ) . during the active phase , they are mostly straight and flow towards the midplane . lobe material is also ineffective at producing channels because it follows the path of least resistance : in a confined ellipsoidal cocoon , it will simply spread out to increase the pressure throughout the cocoon rather than break out in a particular direction . this can be seen in the false synchrotron maps in figure [ coevol ] . these maps assume equipartition and are not indicative of what the sources would look like in the ghz bands . rather , they effectively trace pressure in the cocoon , and it is easy to see that the pressure in the confined cocoon on the left side of the figure remains high relative to the x - shaped source ( the false radio maps use the same scale ) . apart from proto - wings produced by the early pressure - driven expansions , kelvin - helmholtz and rayleigh - taylor instabilities produce channels which backflow reinforces . given sufficient time and a powerful jet , these whorls and fingers can become wings in their own right , but likewise this is due to the growth of the instabilities and buoyancy rather than redirected laminar back - flows . notably , some sources exhibit wings which do _ not _ emanate from the center or are unlikely to have been produced via an overpressured cocoon ( e.g. ngc 326 ) . because it is difficult to channel the back - flows , we hypothesize that if the backflow model is correct , some seed proto - wing was necessary to produce such sources . the origin of these proto - wings is unclear . [ [ wings - expand - subsonically ] ] _ wings expand subsonically _ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + related to the expectation that back - flows are not directly responsible for drilling channels is the prediction that the wings of radio galaxies expand subsonically for most of their lifetimes ( figures [ backflow ] and [ wingvel ] ) . this expectation is contrary to the @xcite `` overpressured cocoon '' and @xcite or @xcite `` buoyant backflow '' proposals in the literature ( section 1 ) and poses a serious problem for the backflow model in terms of explaining long wings . we therefore discuss this point in some detail below . the problem of subsonic expansion can be broken into two distinct objections : ( 1 ) if the wings grow subsonically while the primary lobes grow supersonically , how can wings be longer than the lobes ? and ( 2 ) subsonic expansion implies wing lifetimes of more than 100 myr for sources hundreds of kpc across . the first objection is easier to reconcile with our models because our jets provide a natural mechanism for the subsonic expansion of the lobes , and it is not clear whether most radio galaxies ( even powerful ones ) really do expand very supersonically . further , as we have noted , projection tends to enhance wings . however , the lifetimes of large sources are more difficult to explain . to see this , consider that for a rich cluster atmosphere with @xmath188 kev ( this corresponds to a @xmath189 km s@xmath45 or , conveniently , @xmath117 kpc myr@xmath45 ) , subsonic growth implies that wings 100 kpc from base - to - tip would be at least 100 myr old . in group environments , where @xmath190 km s@xmath45 and monotonically declines at large radii @xcite , the longest observed wings ( e.g. 3c 315 whose wings span @xmath191 kpc ) could be almost 500 myr old ! even if agn activity persisted this long , synchrotron cooling might set in : if the bulk flows of replenishing backflow travel at a lobe sound speed @xmath192 , they would take between 20100 myr to replenish the leading edges of the wings . depending on the break frequency and assuming magnetic fields in equipartition ( @xmath193 of a few @xmath194 g ) and a lorentz factor @xmath187 of several@xmath195 , this may easily exceed the radiative cooling time . to solve this problem , variations of the backflow model require that the wings actually do expand supersonically . in the `` overpressured cocoon '' model @xcite , supersonic wing growth is achieved through sustained pressure - driven expansion , whereas in the `` buoyant backflow '' model @xcite , wings are driven by the nearly free expansion of diverted hypersonic back - flows . our models reproduce overpressured cocoons and hypersonic back - flows , but the overall wing advance speed is subsonic . for the overpressured cocoon model to produce long wings , a sustained overpressured state must be maintained to drive outflows . however , in our models the highly overpressured cocoon that forms soon after ignition quickly expands to reach pressure equilibrium : the supersonic expansion phase lasts at most around 15% of the lifetime of the radio galaxy regardless of the jet we inject ( e.g. figure [ wingvel ] ) . as the radius of the ( isobaric ) cocoon grows , its pressure falls much more rapidly than does that of the surrounding atmosphere at a similar radius ( see also * ? ? ? * figure 2 in their paper ) , so the advance speed of the lateral cocoon expansion falls precipitously from a peak of about mach 2 . thus , overpressured expansion appears to be relevant only very early in the life of the source and by itself can produce only short wings . indeed , this conclusion is supported by earlier simulations @xcite where even in advantageous triaxial atmospheres , the overpressured cocoon produced at most an intrinsic @xmath104 of @xmath196 ( the jets in their work were held at constant velocity and @xmath104 would thus decrease over time ) . @xcite suggest that the overpressured state may instead result from backflow piling up upon reaching the central ( dense ) region of the galaxy . our models do not support this scenario , since the cocoon is contiguous and nearly isobaric throughout the active phase . the buoyant backflow model argues that a combination of buoyancy forces and wings driven by hypersonic flows produce large x - shaped sources . for instance , @xcite estimate that the current outburst in 3c 403 ( figure [ 3c403 ] ) started 16 myr ago . if this outburst was solely responsible for generating the @xmath0 kpc wings hydrodynamically ( as preferred by * ? ? ? * ) , the average expansion speed of the wings would have to be @xmath197 km s@xmath45 ( @xmath198 ) . in contrast , a typical sound speed for galaxy groups is @xmath190 km s@xmath45 , a factor of @xmath199 smaller . likewise , @xcite prefer hypersonic expansion . what could drive such wings ? the answer invoked by these authors is redirected back - flows , which can be accelerated at the terminal hot spots up to a few percent of @xmath200 ( based on the spectral ageing distance method of * ? ? ? * ) . the observational inference of high backflow speeds is consistent with our models and others ( e.g. * ? ? ? * ) , which find back - flow speeds of about twice the lobe sound speed ( @xmath89 ) . further , @xcite argue that the collimated morphologies of some wings requires some driving force . however , it is not evident that these laminar back - flows can be harnessed to drive wing expansion ( see the prior prediction ) . subsonic wing growth in our simulations is a natural consequence of the tendency of backflow ( lobe material ) to mix and expand . the fast back - flows from the terminal shocks merge near the midplane , dissipating their speed and driving flows into the wings which are subsonic relative to the low - density material in the lobes ( figure [ backflow ] ) , although they are still supersonic relative to the background . these flows then expand and decelerate further in the wings , dissipating their thrust over a very large area . hence , detection of @xmath201 km s@xmath45 flows in the wings would be insufficient evidence for hypersonic wing expansion . supersonic wing expansion would require collimation to prevent thrust dissipation . can a collimation mechanism be found ? an obvious possibility we have not included is ordered magnetic fields , since particles can move along them much more easily than across , but @xcite find that in fr ii sources , lobe magnetic fields become turbulent on timescales of @xmath202 myr . more generally , we note that ( weak ) shocks found around double - lobed radio sources often imply cocoon expansion near mach 1 . if a powerful jet can not drive highly supersonic expansion , it seems unlikely that less powerful , more disorganized backflow could do so . lastly , it is important to emphasize that subsonic expansion is only a serious problem for very large wings or very young agn with a large @xmath104 ratio . our simulations can reproduce most winged and x - shaped sources with subsonic expansion if the agn outburst is between 10100 myr old instead of 110 myr . these simulations are also not the final word , as they only solve the equations of hydrodynamics in a relaxed , non - dynamic atmosphere . our results , taken in context , strongly implicate a hydrodynamic origin for x - shaped sources and a common origin for winged and x - shaped sources . we can produce bona fide xrgs ( i.e. with intrinsic @xmath203 ) with a single outburst from a jet with a plausible time dependent kinetic luminosity on timescales broadly consistent with observed sources . the radio galaxies we produce are consistent with prior simulations , and faithful reproductions of observed radio galaxies can be generated by tuning the viewing angle ( figure [ gallery ] ) . these sources are also consistent with most observed properties of the xrg population outlined above , and our simulations reproduce elements of the overpressured cocoon and buoyant backflow models while relying solely on the interaction of the radio lobe material with an anisotropic environment . hence , the backflow model remains a strong contender for the origin of xrgs it would be surprising if some xrgs were _ not _ produced in this manner . however , our simulations also present new challenges to the proposals in the literature : we find that long wings require unusually elliptical atmospheres and expand subsonically , making very long wings difficult to explain . having examined the deficiencies of our simulations , we can not identify an obvious internal remedy ; we note that pre - existing channels are necessary ( in the backflow model ) for some sources in the literature and may be generally important . the final prediction of our simulations is therefore that the xrg population is heterogenous and _ the backflow model works in tandem with other hydrodynamic models rather than solely on its own . _ in short , this is because our models make it too difficult to produce xrgs given their observed frequency . consider that winged and x - shaped sources make up 510% of double - lobed radio sources . if , as in our models , x - shaped sources are produced by a fortunate coincidence of jet geometry , ism ellipticity , and jet power , we might imagine that the fraction of x - shaped sources is some function of each of these variables . in the simplest case , where each of these factors contribute independently to promoting wings , the fraction of xrgs might look like @xmath204 where @xmath205 is the fraction of double - lobed sources which are x - shaped and the other @xmath206 values represent the fraction of sources for each variable which meet the threshold criterion for wings . the exponents are unknown measures of the relative importance of each variable . obviously , the fraction of xrgs must be smaller than the fraction of sources which meet any one criterion . now , consider that virtually all double - lobed radio galaxies emanate from elliptical hosts , and have apparently random jet major axis orientations ( as opposed to the very weakest radio - emitting agn whose jets seem to be pointed along the minor axis of their hosts ; * ? ? ? our models suggest that a jet within @xmath179 of the major axis of its host is required to produce wings . in a uniform distribution of radio jet position angles , we would thus expect that @xmath207 . assuming all powerful jets have a kinetic luminosity function conducive to forming xrgs , we still require about half of all sources where the jet is co - aligned with the major axis to have high ellipticity ( assuming the exponents are all equal to unity ) . given that ellipticity is clearly a very sensitive parameter and that the peak @xmath14 of powerful radio galaxy hosts is far below the wing threshold @xcite , it is clear that our simulations ( in this oversimplified formulation ) underpredict the observed frequency of winged sources . in other words , wings are _ too difficult _ to make in our models . to reconcile this result with the observations , either our models must be fundamentally deficient with respect to the behavior of backflow or they require alternate mechanisms to form proto - wing channels such as the jet stellar shell interaction model of @xcite or the jet merging ism explanation for z - shaped sources in @xcite . as we have seen , backflowing material reinforces any proto - wings and can turn them into full - fledged wings if the original mechanism fails to do so ; making the channels in the first place is what the backflow model can not easily do . thus , we propose that the backflow model has a commensal relationship with other hydrodynamic mechanisms for forming wings by reinforcing and growing any pre - existing channels accessible to a jet pointed along the major axis of its host galaxy . these channels would naturally grow most easily along the steepest pressure gradient . in cases where the jet power and atmosphere size match appropriately , these channels would be produced by the expansion of an overpressured cocoon as in our simulations . in other cases , channels could be produced by the interaction of the jet with structure in the ism or by minor mergers . in this scenario , we would still expect to see most of the predictions of our simulations listed above for the case of pure backflow in a relaxed atmosphere . at this point , it is worth revisiting the buoyant backflow model as phrased in @xcite , where xrgs are unified with other distortions to the canonical fr ii model ( about two thirds of strongly bridged radio galaxies show central distortions ) by the deflection of backflow around a denser medium . these distortions may also be related to radio galaxies with interrupted bridges by the `` superdisk '' model @xcite , in which gas displaced by a galaxy merger is believed responsible for docking the lobes in an asymmetric manner . because the backflow model as expressed in our simulations depends only on a fortuitous combination of atmosphere morphology and jet behavior to produce winged sources , we can indeed reproduce the basic bridge distortions of @xcite . however , we can not reproduce long z - shaped sources and some asymmetric distortions which do not appear to be the result of bulk motion or cluster turbulence . these include sources with a single wing on one side , sources with wings which themselves bend dramatically , sources with one fr i lobe and one fr ii lobe ( hymors ; * ? ? ? again , the main hindrance seems to be the inability to channel backflow ; jets which bend may solve this problem . although there are elements of the behavior of backflow which we do not presently understand , we come to the same conclusion as with x - shaped sources : the backflow model can account for other bridged distortions only in tandem with another hydrodynamic mechanism . we have conducted a series of three - dimensional hydrodynamic simulations of light , hypersonic jets to study the viability of the backflow model for the formation of wings in x - shaped radio galaxies . the xrgs seem to be a population unto themselves , with characteristic environmental geometry , radio power , black hole mass , etc . , and any successful model must account for these peculiarities . our main results follow . 1 . the jets , back - flows , and lobes in our simulations are similar to those in the recent literature , giving us confidence in the usefulness of our simulations as probes of the backflow model . 2 . wings in our models form in two stages : the establishment of channels or proto - wings and then buoyant ( usually subsonic ) expansion . specifically , our models corroborate the overpressured cocoon model of @xcite early on , but as cocoons quickly come to pressure equilibrium with their surroundings , most of the wing length represents subsonic expansion ( figure [ backflow ] ) . we have produced prominent wings by geometry and radio power alone , proving that the backflow model can , in principle , make x - shaped sources ( figure [ coevol ] and [ gallery ] ) . both the atmosphere and jet kinetic luminosity as a function of time are crucial to forming x - shaped sources . long wings are produced in a relatively small portion of parameter space , requiring galaxies with high ellipticity , decaying jets , proper jet orientation , and appropriate atmosphere size ( figures [ atmosplots ] and [ jetplots ] ) . 5 . the main challenges to the backflow model are the requirement for high ellipticity and subsonic wing growth . adding additional physics is not obviously helpful . the backflow model seems to require an additional mechanism to make proto - wings which the backflow reinforces ; in our models , we make these channels by the initial expansion of an overpressured cocoon in an anisotropic environment , but this can not explain every xrg . we can not form new channels solely by deflecting back - flows . if the backflow model can overcome the issues noted above , it is a very strong candidate for explaining x - shaped and other disturbed radio galaxies . our models naturally reproduce many of the characteristics of the xrg population ( table [ predictions ] ) . there are several natural extensions of this work which promise to be fruitful . first , adding magnetic fields and investigating other potential collimating mechanisms may rule out or boost the backflow model depending on the wing expansion speeds attained . second , our models rely on the formation of channels misaligned with the jets ; these have been proposed in several other contexts as well to explain radio galaxy morphology . the origin of these channels is not known , and identifying and testing candidates would be important for wing formation models . third , more realistic jets could determine whether the backflow model can support both long wings and active fr ii lobes with hot spots ; the bending of the jets in particular is an important issue . finally , models which produce the wings hydrodynamically but not explicitly by the deflection of backflow ( e.g. the recently proposed stellar shell model * ? ? ? * ) are worth exploring by making the atmospheres more complex in tandem with more realistic jets . , s. s. , & falle , s. a. e. g. 1996 , in astronomical society of the pacific conference series , vol . 100 , energy transport in radio galaxies and quasars , ed . e. hardee , a. h. bridle , & j. a. zensus , 173+ Abstract:

Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.

Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered . Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video . Paper: _ chandra _ and _ xmm - newton _ observations now routinely allow us to measure both the inverse - compton emission from the lobes of radio galaxies and the thermal bremsstrahlung from the intra - group or intra - cluster media in which they are embedded ( e.g. , * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ) . in almost all cases studied to date , the internal pressures in the radio lobes are comparable to those in the hot , x - ray emitting phase of the external medium , rather than greatly exceeding it as had sometimes been thought to be the case ( cf . * ? ? ? we know of only a few objects the best example being the inner lobes of centaurus a @xcite in which the internal lobe pressures must be much larger than the inferred external pressure , although the limited numbers of such sources found to date is almost certainly affected by selection effects . in the objects where the pressures of the radio - emitting plasma and the x - ray - emitting external medium are comparable , the dynamics of the large - scale radio structures , the lobes and plumes , will be determined , at least in part , by the properties of the hot gas . clear evidence that this is so pre - dates the launch of _ chandra _ and _ xmm - newton _ ( e.g. , * ? ? ? * ) but much more detailed studies have been possible in recent years , particularly in nearby , low - power radio galaxies ( e.g. * ? ? * ; * ? ? ? at the same time , the lobes displace and compress the material that they expand into , as is evident from observations of ` cavities ' in the x - ray - emitting material ( e.g. , * ? ? ? * ) . this means that , when we observe a radio galaxy and its environment , and see a relationship between radio - emitting structures and those in the x - ray , it is often not clear whether what we are seeing is a pre - existing distribution of hot gas that has shaped the radio source that lies in it , or whether , on the other hand , we are seeing the _ effects _ of the radio source on what would otherwise have been a relatively structure - free external medium . in a relaxed system that does not host a powerful radio source we do not expect to find long - lasting complex structure in the hot x - ray - emitting plasma of a group or cluster atmosphere , since any such structure will be washed out on a sound - crossing time . however , complex structures can be created by dynamical processes related to the group or cluster galaxies . cluster or group mergers are known to produce large - scale asymmetries in the icm / igm which may affect the dynamics of radio sources hosted by one of the group / cluster galaxies ( e.g. , * ? ? ? * ) . on smaller scales , galaxy - galaxy interactions and mergers would be expected to give rise to structures in the group or cluster atmosphere , both because they produce a local gravitational potential that is not radially symmetrical and because frictional and tidal processes will give rise to the stripping and heating of gas from the galaxy ( e.g. , * ? ? ? * ) : the latter process is of course important if one or both of the merging systems are massive elliptical galaxies with large pre - existing galaxy - scale hot gas haloes . this makes it particularly interesting to observe radio galaxies in which a major merger is taking place . in this paper we present new _ observations of two nearby radio galaxies , 3c285 and 3c442a , which meet this selection criterion . we show that structures in the x - ray - emitting gas , likely related to the mergers , are almost certainly affecting the dynamics of the lobes of the radio galaxies , and discuss the implications of this result for the radio galaxy population as a whole . more detailed discussion of the dynamics of 3c442a in relation to the ongoing galaxy merger can be found in @xcite . 3c285 is a nearby ( @xmath0 , @xcite ) low - power frii radio galaxy , with a 178-mhz luminosity km s@xmath1 mpc@xmath1 , @xmath2 and @xmath3 . ] of @xmath4 w hz@xmath1 sr@xmath1 , just above the canonical fanaroff - riley @xcite break at @xmath5 w hz@xmath1 sr@xmath1 . at the distance of 3c285 1@xmath6 corresponds to a projected distance of 1.50 kpc : the luminosity distance is 360 mpc . although 3c285 shows jets and hotspots ( best seen in the images of @xcite ) the jets are relatively bright , and the hotspots relatively weak , compared to more luminous frii sources , suggesting that it is in some sense an intermediate object . 3c285 s host galaxy is the brightest member of a small optical group @xcite and is strongly elongated towards a fainter spiral companion 40@xmath6 ( 60 kpc ) to the nnw , suggesting a tidal interaction : an extended filament of optical emission - line gas connects the two galaxies @xcite . several other galaxies with magnitudes that make them likely to be group members lie within 200 kpc . in _ hst _ imaging @xcite 3c285 s host galaxy can be seen to be strongly disturbed , with several distinct linear dust features , suggesting a recent merger with a large , gas - rich galaxy ( cf . * ? ? ? 3c285 is best known for the association of its radio jet with a blue , star - forming region , making it one of the few objects to show direct evidence for jet - induced star formation @xcite . @xcite claim a detection of an optical counterpart to the e hotspot , which we discuss further below ( [ opt - hotspot ] ) . 3c285 had not been detected in the x - ray until the observations discussed in the present paper : the _ einstein _ hri upper limit quoted by @xcite shows that the system is not very x - ray luminous ( their limit corresponds to @xmath7 erg s@xmath1 between 0.5 and 3.0 kev within @xmath8 in the cosmology we use ) . because of its distance from 3c442a it is not detected in any of the x - ray datasets discussed in this paper . ] is associated with the interacting galaxy pair ngc 7236/7 at @xmath9 @xcite . its 178-mhz luminosity of @xmath10 w hz@xmath1 sr@xmath1 puts it below the fri / frii break . at the distance of 3c442a 1@xmath6 is 0.54 kpc : the luminosity distance is 118 mpc . in the radio @xcite , 3c442a shows a double - lobed structure with no sign of any jet , although a compact flat - spectrum radio core coincident with ngc 7237 suggests current agn activity in that object . @xcite argue that the compact features in and close to the lobes are unrelated to the source , which , if true , would make 3c442a a member of the class of ` fat doubles ' or ` relaxed doubles ' ( e.g. , * ? ? ? * ) , a number of which are found in the 3crr sample close to the fri / frii luminosity break . 3c442a is remarkable for the detection by @xcite of two filaments of steep - spectrum radio emission that cross the region containing the host galaxy , ngc 7237 . optically this galaxy , an elliptical ( assumed to be the host on the basis that it hosts a compact radio source ) appears to be interacting with an s0 neighbour of similar luminosity to the ne , ngc 7236 : the two are separated by 35@xmath6 ( 19 kpc ) and are embedded in a common , distorted stellar envelope which also includes another , smaller elliptical 38@xmath6 ( 21 kpc ) to the sw of ngc 7237 , denoted ngc 7237c hereafter @xcite . the measured radial velocities for ngc 7236 and ngc 7237 are very similar , suggesting an interaction close to the plane of the sky , which allowed @xcite to make detailed models of the system . _ hst _ imaging @xcite shows some weak evidence for dust emission in ngc 7237 , but generally the inner parts of the system appear like an undisturbed elliptical , in contrast to 3c285 s host . ngc 7236/7 lies at the center of a group of galaxies @xcite . in the x - ray , @xcite used _ rosat _ data to show that the soft x - ray emission had relatively complex structure , with a small - scale extension around ngc 7237 as well as large - scale ( 3@xmath11 , or 100 kpc ) extension in a direction perpendicular to the radio lobe axis . [ 442-intro ] 3c285 and 3c442a were both observed using the acis instrument on _ chandra_. 3c285 was observed for a total livetime of 39.3 ks in a single observation with the acis - s in the hrc guaranteed time program ( pi : stephen murray ) , as part of a larger project to complete _ chandra _ observations of the 3crr sample at @xmath12 . 3c442a was observed in four separate observations , with three distinct roll angles , with the acis - i as a guest - observer observation ( pi : ralph kraft ) for a total livetime of 93.6 ks . table [ obs ] lists the observing times and obsids for the observations . we reprocessed and filtered the data in the standard way , using the standard asca grade set . both observations were made in vfaint mode and so we used vf cleaning to reduce the background level . the 0.5-pixel event position randomization in the standard pipeline processing was also removed . we then used light curves excluding the nucleus and bright point sources to search for intervals of high background . for 3c285 this flagged a small fraction of the data , as shown in table [ obs ] . llllllll 3c285&acis - s&23678&2006 mar 18&6911&147.6&39625&39280 + 3c442a&acis - i&01236&2005 jul 27&5635&141.5&27006&27006 + & & & 2005 jul 28&6353&141.5&13985&13985 + & & & 2005 oct 07&6359&262.3&19884&19884 + & & & 2005 dec 12&6392&312.2&32694&32694 + [ obs ] both radio galaxies have been well observed with the very large array ( vla ) in the radio at a number of frequencies @xcite and images showing the overall source structure at 1.4 ghz are available from the online 3crr atlas of j.p . leahy et al .. we required high - resolution radio images at multiple frequencies to allow us to compare the radio data with the x - ray data at the highest resolution , and we also needed multi - frequency data sampling the largest angular scales of the sources to allow us to carry out internal pressure and inverse - compton calculations for the radio lobes . accordingly , we retrieved various vla datasets from the online archive ( see table [ vlaobs ] for a complete list ) and reduced them in the standard manner within aips . where the vla had observed the sources at a given frequency at more than one configuration , we reduced the data from each configuration separately , cross - calibrated for phase and then concatenated the datasets with appropriate reweighting using the aips task dbcon . mapping was carried out using the aips tasks imagr ( for the lowest resolutions ) and vtess ( for maps of combined datasets at high resolutions ) . in addition , for flux measurements of the lobes of 3c285 at low frequencies , we used giant meter - wave radio telescope ( gmrt ) data at 240 and 610 mhz taken for another purpose ( pi : martin hardcastle ) . maps from these observations will be presented elsewhere . llllll 3c285&av127&1986 may 07&1.51&a&2.6 + & av127&1986 aug 29&4.85&b&1.9 + & av127&1986 aug 29&1.51&b&1.1 + & av127&1986 dec 02&4.85&c&0.9 + & av127&1986 dec 02&1.51&c&0.5 + & as549&1995 apr 11&4.91&d&0.7 + 3c442a&ac131&1985 may 13&1.44&b&3.0 + & ac131&1985 may 13&4.85&b&2.9 + & ac131&1985 jul 19&1.44&c&2.8 + & ac131&1985 jul 19&4.85&c&2.8 + & ac131&1985 dec 06&1.44&d&1.5 + [ vlaobs ] both sources are close enough that images from the digital sky survey ( dss2 ) can be used to indicate the positions of the galaxies in the host group . in addition , both have been observed with the _ hubble space telescope _ ( _ hst _ ) , as discussed above , and with _ spitzer _ as part of a survey of the low - redshift 3crr objects ( pi : mark birkinshaw ) . we use dss2 and archival _ hst _ data , the latter processed using the standard pipeline , where optical information is important to our analysis . the _ spitzer _ observations of 3c442a are discussed by @xcite and we only refer to them in passing in the present paper . in this section we discuss the main observational results from the _ chandra _ observations . we first briefly describe the small - scale emission seen from the active nuclei of the systems , the detections of or limits on any hotspot or jet - related components , and the other galaxies in the group . we then discuss in detail the extended x - ray emission seen in the _ chandra _ data and its relationship to the radio source . all the x - ray analysis we describe was carried out using ciao 3.3 and caldb 3.2.2 for spectral extraction , and xspec 11.3 for spectral fitting . the _ specextract _ script was used for spectral extraction for extended sources , and the _ psextract _ script for point sources . galactic column densities of @xmath13 @xmath14 and @xmath15 @xmath14 are assumed for 3c285 and 3c442a respectively ( interpolated from the data of @xcite ) and are included in all spectral fits . we fitted to data in the energy range 0.47.0 kev unless otherwise stated : spectra were binned , typically to 20 net counts per bin after background subtraction , so that @xmath16 statistics could be applied . errors quoted on parameters derived from xspec fitting are the 90 per cent confidence range for one interesting parameter , unless otherwise stated , but errors quoted on measured numbers such as flux densities or numbers of counts are the @xmath17 errors . where counts are quoted the @xmath17 errors are derived from the gaussian ( @xmath18 ) approximation to the true confidence range , as calculated by the funtools code used to determine the background - subtracted values this is accurate to better than 10% for @xmath19 counts ( cf . @xcite ) , and the gaussian assumption is necessary in any case if we are to combine errors in the standard way with the uncertainty on the expected background counts . the x - ray nucleus of 3c285 has already been discussed by @xcite , using the same _ chandra _ dataset . they found that it was well modelled as a double power law , with one component being heavily absorbed ( @xmath20 @xmath14 ) and one having only galactic absorption . the nucleus was relatively weak , and so in their fits the poorly constrained power - law indices were fixed to 2.0 and 1.7 for the unabsorbed and absorbed components respectively . a combination of absorbed and unabsorbed emission is consistent with what is seen for other narrow - line frii radio galaxies . 3c442a is a low - excitation radio galaxy @xcite i.e. , a nuclear spectrum of ngc 7237 shows no strong high - excitation emission - line features and so we might expect not to see a heavily absorbed nuclear component @xcite . we extracted spectra for the x - ray source corresponding to the currently active radio core using a small ( 6 standard @xmath21 _ chandra _ pixels in radius ) circular extraction region and a concentric background annulus ( between 6 and 9 pixels ) . the nuclear spectra can be fitted acceptably ( @xmath22 for 12 degrees of freedom ) with a single power law model with galactic absorption and variable normalization ( see below ) , although the best - fitting single power - law photon index fitted to all four spectra simultaneously is rather flat ( @xmath23 ) . there is some evidence in radial profiles of the core region that even this small - scale extraction region contains extended emission , and so it is possible that the spectra are contaminated by some thermal emission , but adding a thermal component does not significantly change the best - fitting power - law spectrum . adding some intrinsic absorption ( the same column density for all four epochs ) gives a more typical power - law index ( @xmath24 ) and a column density of @xmath25 @xmath14 , with a somewhat improved fit ( @xmath26 for 11 degrees of freedom ) . this column density is high , but not unprecedentedly high , compared to other low - power sources , and may indicate some obscuration by the small - scale dust lane that is seen to cross the nucleus in the _ hst _ observation . we estimate a maximum @xmath27 for the off - nuclear extinction seen in the _ hst _ data taken with the f547 m filter , which would be consistent with the lower end of the confidence range for the x - ray absorbing column for a galactic gas to dust ratio . the core was clearly variable over the time period of our observations , and acceptable fits were not obtained unless we allowed the normalizations of the power laws fitted to each dataset to vary . the normalizations for the four epochs listed in table [ obs ] correspond to 1-kev flux densities of @xmath28 , @xmath29 , @xmath30 and @xmath31 njy respectively ( assuming galactic absorption only : flux densities would be approximately a factor 2 higher for the best - fitting absorbing column ) . variability of the photon index as well as the normalization might explain the relatively poor fit and flat photon index given by the combined dataset , but the data are not good enough to constrain this possibility . we were initially concerned that the variability might be an artefact of the data , as the core in the third observation ( obsid 6359 ) lies close to a node boundary , with many events in the core region in the level 1 events file being flagged as being on or near a bad pixel . however , we are satisfied that the ancillary response files ( arfs ) make an adequate correction for this reduced effective exposure time , and we have verified that regions taken from the thermal emission close to the core ( [ tail - fit ] ) do not show any variability in count rate or fitted parameters . we therefore infer that the core is genuinely variable , presumably because of ongoing agn activity . the 5-ghz flux density of the core of 3c442a is 3.1 mjy in the vla data we use , compared to the value of 1.9 mjy from earlier radio observations tabulated by @xcite , so that it appears that the radio core may be similarly variable on long timescales ( months in the case of the x - ray , years in the case of the radio ) . the approximate positions , given the uncertainties imposed by variability and non - simultaneous observations , of the source on the radio / x - ray core flux density and luminosity correlations for low-@xmath32 sources @xcite are consistent with expectations . the bolometric unabsorbed x - ray luminosity of the core region ranges between 2 and @xmath33 erg s@xmath1 , which puts it well above the expectation from x - ray binaries from the whole galaxy @xcite given the @xmath34-band optical luminosity of @xmath35 @xcite . the jets and hotspots of some low - power frii radio galaxies ( e.g. , 3c403 , @xcite ) show prominent synchrotron x - ray counterparts to compact radio features . 3c285 has a well - defined though faint jet and counterjet in the radio and a bright compact hotspot ( in the e lobe ) . however , none of these is detectable as an x - ray source in the chandra observation ( fig.[285-highres - overlay ] ) . the only convincingly detected compact feature in the lobes in the _ chandra _ data ( with @xmath36 counts in the 0.5 - 5.0 kev energy band ) is spatially coincident with the blue object denoted 09.6 by @xcite , lying within @xmath37 of the peak of the resolved optical emission in the _ hst _ images , with a centroiding uncertainty of @xmath38 . 09.6 was identified by @xcite as a star - forming galaxy that is at the redshift of 3c285 s host , whose star formation may be related to the nearby radio jet . roughly , the unabsorbed bolometric x - ray luminosity of this object in the _ chandra _ band is of the order of @xmath39 erg s@xmath1 ( assuming a mekal model with @xmath40 kev ) , which is a plausible luminosity for a dwarf starburst system with @xmath41 ( the absolute magnitude quoted by @xcite : our different cosmology makes no significant difference ) : for example , it is comparable to , though somewhat higher than , the luminosities derived for a sample of nearby , generally somewhat optically fainter dwarf starbursts by @xcite . the x - ray detection is thus consistent with the starburst interpretation for 09.6 . the non - detections of x - ray emission from the jets and hotspots in 3c285 correspond to upper limits on the x - ray flux density . roughly , a @xmath42 upper limit on the total background - subtracted counts in the 0.5 - 5.0 kev energy range from a region corresponding to the brightest compact hotspot ( in the e lobe ) is @xmath43 counts : this corresponds to a flux density limit of @xmath44 njy at 1 kev for a source with photon index 2.0 . however , the radio flux densities for the hotspot components are faint compared to the sources in which x - ray emission has been seen . the total 5-ghz flux density of the e hotspot is 6 mjy , which implies that @xmath45 ( where @xmath46 is the two - point radio - to - x - ray energy spectral index : @xmath47 is defined here and throughout the paper in the sense that flux density @xmath48 ) , but this is not a very strong constraint , as there are some hotspots with detected synchrotron x - ray emission that show @xmath49 @xcite , while we would expect any synchrotron self - compton emission at equipartition to be at the level of about 10 pjy . the e hotspot of 3c285 is potentially interesting as it is the one claimed by @xcite to show an optical counterpart . however , examination of the f702w _ hst _ observations ( originally discussed by @xcite ) shows that the peak of the optical emission from the hotspot region is offset by @xmath50 from the peak of the radio emission , using the default astrometry , which gives a reasonably good alignment ( offset @xmath51 ) between the radio core and the center of the galaxy ( fig . [ 285-hst ] ) . more importantly the optical object is morphologically quite different from the radio structure , and seems most likely to be a faint irregular galaxy . we thus conclude that there is no evidence for any emission from the e hotspot of 3c285 in any band other than the radio . the w hotspot is fainter in the radio , so again we can only put weak limits on the radio to x - ray spectral index , and it has no detectable optical counterparts . overall , the hotspots of 3c285 seem to present a rather different picture to those seen in other nearby frii radio galaxies of similar power such as 3c403 @xcite , 3c321 @xcite and 3c33 @xcite . the hotspots of these objects , which have radio luminosities spanning a range around that of 3c285 , often have optical / ir and x - ray counterparts ; their x - ray emission , largely inferred to be of synchrotron origin , has @xmath52 . the lack of an optical counterpart in particular may suggest that 3c285 s hotspots are not able to accelerate particles to even moderately high energies . however , the biased nature of existing observations of nearby radio galaxies , many of which have been selected for observation because of their prominent radio or optical hotspots , makes it hard to say which is more typical . [ opt - hotspot ] as discussed in [ 442-intro ] , it is not clear whether any of the bright compact radio sources in the 3c442a lobe are related to the radio galaxy itself . the x - ray data shed some light on this question , but do not completely resolve it . [ 442-highres - overlay ] shows our highest - resolution radio map overlaid on lightly smoothed _ chandra _ data in the 0.5 - 5.0 kev band , with point sources labeled using the notation of @xcite . it can be seen that the two point sources , c and e , that lie outside or just on the edge of the lobes are relatively strong x - ray sources , having respectively @xmath53 and @xmath54 net counts in total in our observations . as @xcite report , both these sources have optical counterparts , and it seems most likely that they are background agn of some kind . c has an inverted radio spectrum between 1.4 and 4.9 ghz ( @xmath55 ) while e is steep - spectrum ( @xmath56 ) . the most puzzling of the bright point sources , a , is not detected in the x - ray and has no optical counterpart on dss2 images ( neither the _ hst _ nor _ spitzer _ fields of view are large enough to give us more sensitive infrared or optical constraints ) . it is resolved at the highest radio resolution we have available ( @xmath57 ) into two components separated by @xmath58 , the northern one unresolved and containing most of the flux , the southern one slightly resolved . its radio spectrum is steep ( @xmath59 ) , consistent with the results of @xcite at lower frequencies , which might imply that it is part of the source : but the lack of any connection to the filamentary structure in the lobes remains a strong argument against this , and it might equally well be a high - redshift double or core - jet source . if the source were a hotspot , the @xmath42 upper limit of 6 net counts in our observations , corresponding to 0.1 njy at 1 kev for a source with photon index 2.0 , would imply @xmath60 , but again this is not incompatible with the behaviour of some hotspots . no x - ray counterpart is detected for the weak point source d discussed by @xcite , but it seems likely to be part of the complex filamentary structure in that part of the lobe , rather than a true point source . we do not detect the source b , referred to by @xcite , in our radio images . we used the nasa extragalactic database , ned , to search for optical objects identified as galaxies around the position of 3c285 and , where possible , to obtain their redshifts as determined by the sloan digital sky survey . in a @xmath61 search radius ( chosen to cover the acis - s3 chip : equivalent to 450 kpc at the distance of 3c285 ) there are 13 objects classified as galaxies ( including 3c285 itself ) of which 8 have measured radial velocities : 6 of these are possibly consistent with membership of the 3c285 group , while the other two are foreground objects . the positions and redshifts of these nearby galaxies are listed in table [ 285-sdss ] . a few of these galaxies are detected in x - rays in the _ chandra _ data . we tabulate counts measured from the events file in @xmath62 ( 15 kpc ) extraction regions with background subtraction from a larger local background region . upper limits are @xmath42 values based on poisson statistics and derived from the local background value . lllll 3c285 & @xmath63 & @xmath64 & 23804 & @xmath65 + sdss j132116.31 + 423551.3 & @xmath66 & @xmath67 & & @xmath68 + sdss j132114.49 + 423620.3 & @xmath69 & @xmath70 & & @xmath71 + sdss j132114.01 + 423557.5 & @xmath72 & @xmath73 & 23738 & @xmath74 + sdss j132114.75 + 423631.1 & @xmath75 & @xmath76 & 24623 & @xmath77 + sdss j132117.98 + 423657.4 & @xmath78 & @xmath79 & 24130 & @xmath80 + sdss j132130.21 + 423544.3 & @xmath81 & @xmath82 & 22643 & @xmath74 + maps - ngp o-219 - 0156129 & @xmath83 & @xmath84 & & @xmath85 + maps - ngp o-219 - 0183438 & @xmath86 & @xmath87 & & @xmath74 + sdss j132131.68 + 423208.2 & @xmath88 & @xmath89 & 10678 & @xmath74 + maps - ngp o-219 - 0156725 & @xmath90 & @xmath91 & & + sdss j132051.31 + 423550.5&@xmath92 & @xmath93 & 15351 & @xmath94 + sdss j132058.74 + 423147.6 & @xmath95 & @xmath96 & 22115 & + [ 285-sdss ] although the two bright galaxies adjacent to 3c285 have no spectroscopic information available in sdss , we can estimate the velocity dispersion of the group from the information we have . if we include all sdss velocities with @xmath97 km s@xmath1 , then the mean heliocentric radial velocity is @xmath98 km @xmath99 , and the velocity dispersion @xmath100 is @xmath101 km s@xmath1 , which would be high for a group . however , as table [ 285-sdss ] shows , the two galaxies furthest away from 3c285 have radial velocities that differ markedly from its velocity . if we consider only the four galaxies closest to 3c285 on the sky then the mean velocity is 24070 km s@xmath1 , about 270 km s@xmath1 higher than that of 3c285 itself , but the velocity dispersion is a more reasonable @xmath102 km s@xmath1 ( where the errors are determined using the method of @xcite ) . we can not draw many conclusions from such a small number of radial velocities ( a relatively short optical observation would give us much better constraints on the nature of the optical group ) but it seems likely that only the inner galaxies in this region should be considered to be bound group members . using the relation of @xcite the lower velocity dispersion would be expected to correspond to a temperature for the x - ray gas of @xmath103 kev , where the errors here are only statistical and take no account of the scatter in the @xmath100 @xmath104 relation . [ 285-vd ] as for 3c285 , we used ned to search for galaxies in the 3c442a group . as 3c442a is substantially closer to us , the data are better : in a @xmath105 ( 450 kpc ) radius aperture there are 40 galaxies , all of which have measured radial velocities from the sdss or elsewhere . 31 of these have radial velocities within 1000 km s@xmath1 of the value for ngc7236/7 , and so are potential group members . positions and radial velocities of these objects are tabulated in table [ 442a - sdss ] . lllll ngc 7237 & @xmath106 & @xmath107 & 7868 & @xmath108 + ngc 7236 & @xmath109 & @xmath110 & 7879 & @xmath111 + ngc 7237c & @xmath112 & @xmath113 & 7153 & @xmath114 + sdss j221439.24 + 134920.0 & @xmath115 & @xmath116 & 7997&@xmath117 + sdss j221437.58 + 135053.0 & @xmath118 & @xmath119 & 8375&@xmath120 + 2masx j22144047 + 1352416 & @xmath121 & @xmath122 & 8030&@xmath123 + sdss j221437.45 + 135228.9&@xmath124 & @xmath125 & 8280&@xmath120 + sdss j221432.20 + 134825.4 & @xmath126 & @xmath127 & 7679&@xmath123 + sdss j221437.45 + 135229.0&@xmath128 & @xmath129 & 7915&@xmath120 + sdss j221451.49 + 135543.8 & @xmath130 & @xmath131 & 35633 & @xmath132 + cgcg 428 - 060 & @xmath133 & @xmath134 & 7270 & @xmath135 + lsbc f673 - 02 & @xmath136 & @xmath137 & 7293 & @xmath138 + sdss j221445.84 + 134449.8&@xmath139 & @xmath140 & 8161 & @xmath120 + sdss j221509.33 + 134813.3 & @xmath141 & @xmath142 & 7952&@xmath143 + sdss j221424.81 + 134633.4 & @xmath144 & @xmath145 & 7263 & @xmath146 + sdss j221445.10 + 134304.9&@xmath147 & @xmath148 & 8207 & @xmath149 + cgcg 428 - 059 & @xmath150 & @xmath151 & 7245 & @xmath152 + sdss j221514.93 + 135419.6 & @xmath153 & @xmath154 & 17810 & @xmath155 + sdss j221413.65 + 135044.0 & @xmath156 & @xmath157 & 120542&@xmath117 + sdss j221444.51 + 135836.6 & @xmath158 & @xmath159 & 7920&@xmath123 + lcsb s2633p & @xmath160 & @xmath161 & 7222 & @xmath123 + sdss j221414.03 + 135232.4&@xmath162 & @xmath163 & 7276&@xmath117 + sdss j221435.72 + 135822.6&@xmath164 & @xmath165 & 8297&@xmath143 + cgcg 428 - 054 & @xmath166 & @xmath167 & 7795 & @xmath168 + sdss j221508.74 + 135815.1 & @xmath169 & @xmath170 & 7799 & @xmath171 + sdss j221450.80 + 134051.3 & @xmath172 & @xmath173 & 7374 & @xmath174 + sdss j221422.18 + 134248.3 & @xmath175 & @xmath176 & 18124&@xmath177 + sdss j221527.93 + 135114.3&@xmath178 & @xmath179 & 6634 & @xmath180 + sdss j221530.83 + 134912.5 & @xmath181 & @xmath182 & 115271&@xmath117 + sdss j221404.42 + 134601.3 & @xmath183 & @xmath184 & 7645 & @xmath185 + sdss j221414.10 + 135901.2 & @xmath186 & @xmath187 & 29751&@xmath188 + sdss j221514.34 + 134045.3 & @xmath189 & @xmath190 & 8356 & + sdss j221407.71 + 134230.7 & @xmath191 & @xmath192 & 7361& + sdss j221402.08 + 134424.9 & @xmath193 & @xmath194 & 120609& + sdss j221515.54 + 140059.1 & @xmath195 & @xmath196 & 7956& + sdss j221540.36 + 135255.5&@xmath197 & @xmath198 & 7434& + sdss j221509.85 + 140230.4&@xmath199 & @xmath200 & 8314&@xmath201 + sdss j221356.95 + 135601.3 & @xmath202 & @xmath203 & 31005&@xmath204 + ugc 11953 & @xmath205 & @xmath206 & 7585& + sdss j221542.30 + 134855.7&@xmath207 & @xmath208 & 7923&@xmath204 + [ 442a - sdss ] several of the other galaxies in the 3c442a group , and one or two of the background galaxies , are detected in the _ chandra _ image . as with 3c285 , we measure counts in a @xmath62 aperture with a larger local background region , and these are tabulated in table [ 442a - sdss ] . because the response is non - uniform over the field covered by the observations , as a result of the multiple _ chandra _ pointings , we have used the exposure maps to correct all the counts tabulated to be equivalent to those measured at ngc 7237 with the full exposure of the combined dataset , by scaling the measured counts and error up by the ratio of the exposure map value at the position of the source to the exposure map value at the position of ngc 7237 . where there is no detection , an upper limit is tabulated , which is the @xmath42 value determined using poisson statistics based on the local background count density and then scaled by the exposure in the same way : upper limits are thus higher for regions with shorter exposure . in all cases background - subtracted , scaled counts or limits are rounded to the nearest integer . the only galaxy other than ngc 7237 bright enough for spectroscopy is ngc 7236 . the nucleus of this source is a compact x - ray source with @xmath209 net counts in the 0.55.0 kev band ( using a @xmath210 source circle and adjacent background ) . because these counts are spread over the four observations , we had to bin the spectra to 10 net counts per bin ( rather than our usual 20 ) to give us enough bins for spectral fitting . we then fitted the joint spectrum derived from the four datasets . the spectrum is equally well fitted with a very steep power law or with a thermal ( mekal ) model with @xmath211 kev , both with galactic absorption , the latter giving @xmath212 for 6 d.o.f . with abundance fixed to 0.5 solar . the unabsorbed bolometric x - ray luminosity in the thermal model was @xmath213 erg s@xmath1 . there was no evidence for any variation of the normalization of the spectrum between the datasets . thus there is no evidence for any agn - related emission in the center of ngc 7236 . using the subset of 31 galaxies with @xmath214 km s@xmath1 we determine the mean heliocentric radial velocity of the group to be 7768 km s@xmath1 , within 100 km s@xmath1 of the velocity of ngc 7236/7 itself . the velocity dispersion is @xmath215 km s@xmath1 , so we would expect a temperature for the intragroup gas of @xmath216 kev using the @xmath100@xmath104 relation of @xcite . [ 442-vd ] both sdss quasars in the field ( sdss j221458.45 + 135344.7 , with @xmath217 , and sdss j221453.84 + 140022.2 , @xmath218 ) are clearly detected in x - rays , with @xmath219 and @xmath220 exposure - corrected 0.5 - 5.0 kev counts respectively . clear asymmetrical extended x - ray emission is visible on arcminute scales around 3c285 ( fig . [ 285-smooth ] ) . near the nucleus , the elongation is in a similar direction to the elongation of the optical axis of the host galaxy : on larger scales , it extends in the direction of the other nearby galaxies in the group , and essentially perpendicular to the radio source axis . the central region of emission , roughly corresponding to the red - colored region in ( fig.[285-smooth ] , extends for just over @xmath221 ( 90 kpc in projection ) but the x - ray emission to the nw and se of the main extended region is connected to it by other x - ray emission at @xmath222 per cent confidence , so it is possible that we should view the whole region from se to nw of the nucleus as forming one physical bar or disk of x - ray - emitting material with varying density , with a size scale of up to @xmath223 ( 220 kpc ) . for convenience , and without presupposing any particular physical interpretation , we follow @xcite and refer to the structure as the ` ridge ' in what follows . we extracted a spectrum for the ridge from a @xmath224 rectangle centred on the host galaxy , with the long axis in position angle @xmath225 ( measured n through e ) . this region contains @xmath226 net 0.55.0 kev counts , using off - source background , and we found that it was acceptably fitted ( @xmath227 for 10 d.o.f . ) with a single - temperature mekal model with fixed abundance of 0.35 solar ( we adopt this value as the data are not adequate to constrain abundance ) and @xmath228 kev . the bolometric unabsorbed x - ray luminosity of the ridge on this model is @xmath229 erg s@xmath1 . the residuals for this model show a soft excess which can be modeled as a @xmath230-kev thermal plasma , also with 0.35 abundance ( the temperature is not well constrained , but @xmath231 kev at 90 per cent confidence ) without affecting the temperature of the hot component , @xmath232 kev : this gives an improvement in the fit to @xmath233 for 8 d.o.f .. a somewhat less good fit is obtained ( @xmath234 for 9 d.o.f . ) if the second component in the two - temperature model is fixed to the temperature ( 0.64 kev ) derived from fits to the group - scale gas ( see below ) : in this case the hotter component has @xmath235 kev . the hotter component is always the dominant one in these fits , and the addition of a second thermal component reduces the emission measure by at most 10% . some weak excess emission is also spatially coincident with the lobes of 3c285 ( this is just visible in parts of the lobe in fig.[285-smooth ] ) . we extract spectra in two circular regions matched to the e and w lobes , excluding point sources and the region of the ridge described above , and taking a background annulus concentric with the lobes . we find @xmath236 counts in the e lobe and @xmath237 counts in the w lobe : thus only the e lobe is significantly detected . fitting a power - law model to the e lobe s spectrum we find a photon index of @xmath238 ( @xmath17 error : @xmath239 for 2 d.o.f . ) which is consistent with the expectations from the inverse - compton process , although of course the errors are large and the spectrum would be equally consistent with a hot thermal model . assuming the power - law model and best - fitting photon index , the 1-kev flux density of the e lobe is @xmath240 njy , and , scaling by count rate , @xmath241 njy for the w lobe . the predicted 1-kev flux density of emission from inverse - compton scattering of the cosmic microwave background radiation ( cmbr ) for equipartition between magnetic fields and radiating electrons ( using the code of @xcite ) is 0.6 njy for the e lobe and 0.9 njy for the w lobe : thus , if all the emission from the e lobe is inverse - compton in origin , the lobe must be somewhat out of equipartition , though not by a particularly unusual amount in the context of frii sources in general @xcite . on larger scales , there is some excess emission on @xmath242 ( 150-kpc ) scales even when the ` ridge ' , the lobes and all the point sources ( including all those visible on fig . [ 285-highres - overlay ] ) are masked out . in a @xmath242 source circle with an adjacent background annulus ( the largest circular region that can be examined without going off the s3 chip ) there are @xmath243 net 0.55.0 kev counts . fitting a spectrum to this region , we found it to be adequately modeled ( @xmath244 for 5 d.o.f . ) with a mekal model , again with fixed abundance of 0.35 solar , with @xmath245 kev . this temperature is consistent with the rough prediction of the group gas temperature made in [ 285-vd ] . we used radial profiling ( again masking out the lobes and elongated central region , but not masking the central few arcsec to allow fitting to the central point source ) , correcting for the small changes in _ chandra _ s response over this radial distance with an exposure map , to determine rough structural parameters of this extended component , fitting @xmath246 models convolved with the _ chandra _ psf in the manner described by @xcite ( using the psf models of @xcite ) to the small- and large - scale structure . the nucleus is faint enough that distortions of the nuclear psf as a result of pileup can be neglected . although the values of @xmath246 are not well constrained ( values @xmath247 are preferred ) we find a good fit ( @xmath248 for 7 d.o.f . ) with a combination of a point source ( for the central active nucleus ) , a small - scale @xmath246 model with @xmath249 , @xmath250 , representing the environment close to the host galaxy , and a large - scale @xmath246-model with @xmath251 , @xmath252 ( @xmath253 kpc ) , representing the group . the radial profile and best - fitting models are shown in fig . [ 285-profile ] . the number of counts in the entire @xmath246 model ( i.e. assuming spherical symmetry , neglecting the fact that some material will have been removed from the lobes , and correcting for the contribution of the @xmath246 model to the background region ) is @xmath254 0.55.0 kev counts : this number is insensitive in our fits to the exact values of @xmath246 and @xmath255 used . converting to a luminosity using the temperature fitted above , this would correspond to an undisturbed group bolometric x - ray luminosity of @xmath256 erg s@xmath1 ( note that this only includes statistical errors , and takes no account of systematics in our assumptions ) which would place the system close to the temperature - luminosity relationship for groups in general ( e.g. , * ? ? ? * ) , given the relatively large uncertainty in temperature . we therefore feel justified in assuming that this faint extended component is the group environment in which 3c285 s host currently resides . we comment later in the paper ( [ impact ] ) on the effect the current radio source is likely to have on this environment . the temperature determined above for the group - scale gas is clearly cooler than that of the ridge ( within the joint 90% confidence limits ) for our choices of a fixed abundance of 0.35 solar , which might suggest that the ridge and group - scale gas have a physically different origin . however , if the two components are fitted jointly , each with an independent normalization and temperature , lower abundances are preferred ( @xmath257 at 90% confidence ) , and for abundances fixed at a low value the best - fitting temperature of the ridge emission comes down to @xmath258 kev , consistent with that of the group gas within the errors : accordingly , acceptable , though poorer , fits are possible to the joint dataset with a single gas temperature around @xmath259 kev with these low abundances . although we adopt the temperatures determined from our original fits in subsequent analysis , we can not draw any strong conclusions from the apparent difference in temperature between the two components . 3c442a shows striking x - ray structure related to the host interacting galaxy pair ngc 7236/7237 ( fig . [ 442-centre ] ) . both galaxies appear to have ` tails ' of extended , asymmetrical x - ray - emitting material , presumably radiating thermally ( see below ) , with size scales around @xmath260 ( 20 kpc ) . the tail of ngc 7237 lies in position angle @xmath261 ( n through e ) and that of ngc 7236 in position angle @xmath262 . the tail of ngc 7237 was seen with the _ rosat _ hri by @xcite . as there is no evidence for corresponding emission in the optical image ( fig . [ 442-centre ] ) , where the distorted isophotes of the two galaxies are on smaller scales @xcite , the tails must be formed not by tidal processes but by some hydrodynamical process such as ram pressure stripping ( e.g. , * ? ? ? * ) or bondi - hoyle wake formation @xcite . the x - ray tails are in the direction expected from the compression of the outer optical isophotes , which suggests that ngc 7237 is currently moving towards the ne and ngc 7236 towards the sw @xcite . equally striking is the relationship between these tails and the filamentary structure in the radio , as seen in the right - hand panel of fig . [ 442-centre ] . the brightest filament in the center of 3c442a passes directly through the gap between the two tails ( crossing the nucleus of ngc 7236 ) , while the other bright filament in the system runs along the s boundary of the ngc 7237 tail . given this , together with the qualitative similarity between the shape of the ngc 7237 tail ( e - w at the w end , curving to ne - sw at the n end ) and those of the two filaments , it seems almost certain that the filamentary structure arises from interaction between the radio plasma and the tails . we return to this point below ( [ tails ] ) . we extracted x - ray spectra for the two tails using rectangular regions with adjacent background ( excluding emission from the nuclei of both galaxies ) , and fitted them with mekal models with free abundance . this gives a good fit to the ngc 7237 tail ( @xmath263 for 56 d.o.f . , @xmath264 kev , abundance @xmath265 solar ) and an acceptable though rather poor fit to the ngc 7236 tail ( @xmath266 for 44 d.o.f . , @xmath267 kev , abundance @xmath268 ) . the bolometric x - ray luminosity of the tail regions with these fits is @xmath269 erg s@xmath1 and @xmath270 erg s@xmath1 respectively . on larger scales , the tails merge into an elongated region that is very similar in appearance to the ` ridge ' of 3c285 , confirming the result of @xcite . to illustrate this we masked out all point sources ( including the central nuclear point sources ) and produced an exposure - corrected image from the combined dataset , extending to the edges of the combined field of view of the observations . smoothing this with a large gaussian shows the large - scale structure in the source ( fig . [ 442-large ] ) . the ` ridge ' in 3c442a extends perpendicular to the radio source axis , as in 3c285 , for 4.5 arcmin ( 150 kpc ) , again ( as in 3c285 ) terminating near a bright galaxy that is probably a group member . excess x - ray emission extends to the n and s of the sw lobe and there is a clear deficit of emission coincident with the lobe itself ( and hints of a deficit associated with the ne lobe as well ) . we extracted a spectrum for the ridge using a @xmath271 rectangle centered on ngc 7237 , excluding only the nuclear point sources of the two galaxies . this spectrum clearly contains much of the emission of the two x - ray tails discussed above . although the spectrum is roughly consistent with the type of model that might have been expected from the results of fitting to the tails , the data are not very well fitted with a single - temperature model ( @xmath272 for 146 degrees of freedom : @xmath273 kev , abundance @xmath274 solar ) and the fit is improved if a two - temperature model is used ( @xmath275 for 145 d.o.f . , @xmath276 kev , @xmath277 kev : here we fix abundance to 0.3 solar , as determined in the fits above , since it is degenerate with relative normalization of the mekal models ) . this may suggest that the ` ridge ' is a mixture of cool gas from the tails and hot gas from another source . the bolometric x - ray luminosity of the ridge in these models is @xmath278 erg s@xmath1 . azimuthally symmetrical emission on scales of @xmath279 is also clearly visible in the image of fig . [ 442-large ] . as with 3c285 , this seems likely to be thermal emission from a typical group - scale atmosphere . we extracted spectra from a @xmath280 radius source circle around the source , with background taken from an adjacent annulus , using the three of the four observations ( obsids 5635 , 6353 and 6392 ) with enough of a distance between the source and the edge of the chips to allow this . point sources and the rectangular region around the ` ridge ' were excluded , but the lobes were not , as there is no direct evidence that their x - ray emission is significant . counts from the background dominate the spectrum ( there were @xmath281 net counts but @xmath282 total counts in the extraction region ) and the spectra were heavily binned before fitting to obtain adequate signal to noise . fitting with a mekal model we obtain a reasonable fit ( @xmath283 for 39 d.o.f . ) but with a poorly constrained temperature , @xmath284 kev . abundance is not constrained in these fits and we set it to 0.3 solar , matching our results for the ridge . the temperature we determine here is appropriate for a rich group or poor cluster ( it is consistent , for example , with the virgo cluster at @xmath285 kev ) . we extracted a radial profile for the large - scale emission , again using the three obsids for which annuli out to @xmath61 could be fitted on the acis - i chips and correcting for vignetting using exposure maps . all structure on scales less than @xmath286 , as well as larger - scale emission from the ` ridge ' and point sources , were excluded from the profile . we fitted @xmath246 models to the profile , and although the restricted angular range of the profile meant that it was not possible to constrain @xmath246 ( @xmath246 values @xmath247 are preferred ) we obtained a good fit ( @xmath287 for 27 d.o.f . ) with @xmath251 , @xmath288 ( @xmath289 kpc ; error for fixed @xmath246 value only ) . fig . [ 442-profile ] shows the profile and best - fitting @xmath246 model . our fits allow us to estimate the 0.5 - 5.0 kev count rate in the three observations used , extrapolating the @xmath246 model , as @xmath290 s@xmath1 , which , assuming the temperature fits above , implies a bolometric x - ray luminosity of @xmath291 erg s@xmath1 ( again , errors quoted here come from the uncertainty in the radial profile alone and do not include systematic effects ) . given the large uncertainty on derived temperature , this is consistent with the temperature - luminosity relation for the high-@xmath292 end of the group population ( or low-@xmath292 end of the cluster population ) particularly if the true temperature is closer to the lower end of its 90 per cent confidence range . a lower temperature would be more probable given the velocity dispersion for the group calculated in [ 442-vd ] , but we note that groups around radio galaxies of similar luminosity to 3c442a often have temperatures that exceed those predicted from the temperature - luminosity relation @xcite . in this section we first consider ( [ dynamics ] ) the implications of these observations for the dynamics of the radio sources . we then go on to consider the origin of the asymmetrical ` ridge ' structures in the two systems , and show ( [ origin ] ) that it is unlikely that the radio galaxy can have given rise to these features , implying that the environment shapes the radio source , rather than vice versa . this allows us to construct simple pictures of the history of both systems in terms of the interactions of gas and radio sources . the impact of the radio sources on their group environments may be substantial , and we comment on this in ( [ impact ] ) . the process of ridge formation and interaction may be important to other sources with central gaps in the radio lobes , and we discuss these in [ gaps ] . finally , in [ tails ] , we discuss the gas being stripped from the merging galaxies hosting 3c442a and its interaction with the filamentary radio structure at the center of the source . to discuss the effects of the x - ray emitting material on the radio source it is first necessary to estimate the pressure in the radio lobes . we assume initially that only the radiating electrons / positrons and magnetic field contribute to the internal pressure : it follows ( since the sound speed in a relativistic plasma is high ) that it is appropriate to quote a single value for the internal pressure . minimum pressures can then be derived in the standard way for the lobes of both sources given their sizes and flux densities . we use an electron spectrum with @xmath293 and @xmath294 , where @xmath295 is the lorentz factor of the electrons ( @xmath296 ) : the results are insensitive to the precise choices of the low- and high - energy cutoffs . the electron spectrum has a broken powerlaw form , such that @xmath297 for @xmath298 and @xmath299 for @xmath300 . @xmath301 , the low - energy electron energy power - law index ( ` injection index ' ) is taken to be 2.0 and the value of @xmath302 is determined from a fit to the observed radio lobe spectrum . the filling factor is set to unity ( as standard for minimum - energy calculations ) and the magnetic field is assumed to be tangled on small scales . for 3c285 , the possible detection of inverse - compton emission via scattering of cmbr photons from the n lobe gives us a _ measurement _ of the pressure , again assuming that only radiating particles and field are present , since it gives a direct constraint on the number density of electrons , which in turn fixes the magnetic field strength given the observed synchrotron emissivity . for 3c442a , the non - detection of inverse - compton emission gives us limits on the extent to which the lobe pressures can be dominated by electrons . we determine pressures as a function of radius in the groups for the detected large - scale thermal components using the method of @xcite , assuming spherical symmetry . for the ` ridge ' components the appropriate assumptions are less obvious . we derive approximate pressures on the assumption of uniform particle density , converting from the xspec mekal normalization to density and thus pressure in the standard way . we use the two measured dimensions of the spectral extraction region for the ridge to estimate its size in the plane of the sky . the extension along the line of sight is uncertain , and we consider two cases , treating the ridge either as a cylinder whose long axis is in the plane of the sky , or as a disk viewed edge - on . because the density depends only on the square root of the volume , these two geometries do not give rise to markedly different densities and pressures . the minimum pressures in the ne and sw lobes of 3c285 are @xmath303 pa and @xmath304 pa respectively ( the difference arises because of the fainter flux density and larger volume of the sw lobe ) . if we assume that all the x - ray flux from the ne lobe is inverse - compton in origin , its pressure is @xmath305 pa , where the error comes from the uncertainty on the measured x - ray flux density . this is an upper limit on the pressure if the lobes are electron - dominated . for the group - scale emission , the extrapolated pressure at the base of the lobes , @xmath306 ( 15 kpc ) in projection from the nucleus , using the best - fitting @xmath246 model , is @xmath307 pa ( the dominant error here is the uncertainty on the best - fitting x - ray temperature : the uncertainties on density from the @xmath246 model fits are far smaller ) . at the far end of the lobes , @xmath308 ( 140 kpc ) from the core , the thermal pressure is @xmath309 pa . formal errors due to the arbitrarily assumed abundance of 0.35 solar can not be estimated from the data , but pressure would increase by a factor 1.5 if the abundance were 0.1 solar and decrease by a factor 1.5 if it were 1.0 solar , giving a range which is similar in magnitude to that derived from the uncertainties in temperature . even with the large uncertainties on both internal and external pressure , it is clear that 3c285 resembles other low - power frii sources in poor environments ( e.g. , * ? ? ? * ) as well as more powerful objects ( e.g. , * ? ? ? * ) in having lobes that are close to being in pressure balance with the external thermal environment . it seems likely that at their far ends the lobes are continuing to expand at subsonic or mildly supersonic speeds ( even the maximum possible external thermal pressure only just balances the internal minimum pressure of the ne lobe here ) , while at the ends closest to the nucleus they can no longer expand transversely . the pressure in the central ` ridge ' , assuming our best - fitting temperature and a uniform distribution of x - ray emitting gas , is @xmath310 pa ( cylindrical geometry ) or @xmath311 pa ( disk geometry ) , where the errors are again dominated by the errors on our spectrally determined temperature ( we use the best - fitting single - temperature model for simplicity ) and again extreme variations in abundance could cause pressure variations by a factor 1.5 in either direction . this ridge pressure is in some sense a mean pressure in the region if there is a density gradient , as the surface brightness suggests , then the pressure will be higher closer to the center and lower at the edges . thus , the fact that the ` ridge ' pressure is comparable to or higher than the lobe pressure means that if our radio pressure calculations are correct ( i.e. the lobes are not dominated in pressure terms by some non - radiating component such as protons ) then we would predict that the lobes must avoid the region of the ridge . this is consistent with the observation ( fig . [ 285-smooth ] ) that the lobe plasma largely avoids the ridge ; in fact , the extensions of the lobes at the base to the s ( ` wings ' ) are on scales that suggest that the lobe plasma may be flowing around the ridge . the anticoincidence between the lobe material and the ridge is not perfect , but this is likely to be due to projection , since the jet - counterjet asymmetry in 3c285 strongly suggests that the radio source is not precisely in the plane of the sky . for 3c442a we measure minimum pressures ( using the assumptions discussed above ) from the outer regions of the lobe only , ignoring the central region where an assumption of uniform plasma filling factor would clearly not be appropriate , so that the pressures measured here are for the parts of the source that lie outside the ridge region on fig . [ 442-large ] . the minimum pressures we obtain are @xmath312 and @xmath313 pa for the ne and sw lobes respectively . these are lower than the 3c285 pressures , since 3c442a has both lower radio luminosity and a slightly larger physical size . the external thermal pressures are much larger than the minimum pressures at all points in the radio source . at @xmath314 ( 25 kpc ) , the inner edge of the region measured for the ne lobe , the extrapolated pressure ( our @xmath246-model fit does not extend to this radius ) is @xmath315 pa ( where the large ( 90% confidence ) errors we quote come entirely from the poorly constrained temperature : the uncertainties from @xmath246-model fitting are negligible by comparison , though there is a possibility of systematic errors due to the extrapolation , and we assume that large deviations from the abundance fitted to the ridge are not likely ) . at the edges of the lobes at @xmath280 @xmath316 ( 150180 kpc ) the pressures are still @xmath317 pa , at least an order of magnitude above the radio minimum pressures . thus , although 3c442a s radio structure is not that of a classical fri radio source , it obeys a tendency that has been known for many years ( e.g. , @xcite ; @xcite ) and rediscovered recently in the context of cluster - center sources ( e.g. , * ? ? ? * ) for low - power radio sources to have minimum pressures that lie substantially ( often 12 orders of magnitude ) below the external thermal pressure . radio lobes can not evolve to a state in which they are substantially underpressured with respect to the external medium : both theory ( e.g. , * ? ? ? * ) and observation @xcite imply that they are likely to be strongly overpressured initially , and , while the internal pressure should drop as the linear size of the source increases , any drop below the external pressure will cause the external thermal material to expand into the lobe region , compressing the lobe plasma until pressure balance is restored . observations that suggest that the minimum pressure is below the external pressure therefore imply some additional contribution to the internal pressure , via a large departure from equipartition , a low filling factor , and/or a dominant contribution from non - radiating particles such as protons . a departure from equipartition in the direction of electron dominance is almost certainly ruled out , since at pressure balance it would produce a 1-kev flux density via inverse - compton scattering of the cmbr of about 90 njy per lobe , giving a count rate in _ chandra _ observations that would exceed that from the thermal emission from the entire group . in fact , if anything there is a deficit of x - ray emission from the lobes , particularly the w lobe , as mentioned above . as magnetic domination by large factors is not observed in lobes of sources where inverse - compton emission can be studied @xcite , we favor a model in which the lobe pressure is dominated by non - radiating particles . in the case of more typical fri sources it has been suggested that protons from the external thermal material could be entrained and efficiently heated to high energies by the jets ( temperatures much greater than that of the external thermal material are required to avoid the detection of this component through its thermal bremsstrahlung ) . as no jets of the sort seen in normal fris are present in 3c442a , this explanation would only be viable if the lobes were at one time driven by fri - type jets that are now no longer present , or no longer visible . alternatively , a population of relativistic protons could have been injected into the lobes along with the radiating electrons ( though this is inconsistent with the picture in frii lobes where an energetically dominant proton population is disfavored : @xcite ) or the lobes could have engulfed large regions of thermal material , though again some unknown efficient heating mechanism would be required . the pressure in the ` ridge ' in 3c442a , again assuming uniform density , is @xmath318 pa ( cylindrical geometry ) or @xmath319 pa ( disk geometry ) , so , unsurprisingly , the ridge pressure is equal to or exceeds the extrapolated central pressure of the extended emission , in spite of the lower temperature of the ridge material ( here again we are using the best - fitting single - temperature model for the ridge ) . the pressures derived by @xcite , using a @xmath246-model fit to the ridge region , are similar . thus even if the lobe is in pressure balance with the thermal material further out ( as it must be , to avoid collapse on a sound - crossing time ) the lobe pressure will be lower than the ridge pressure , and the lobe material will be excluded from the ridge region unless it can achieve higher pressures . [ 442-large ] shows that material in the lobes , particularly the w lobe , does seem to be avoiding the ridge and to be being pushed out in wings to the n and s , as well as possibly along the line of sight ( note the strong radio brightness gradient to the w of the ridge ) . there is still radio - emitting material in the ridge region , but , as discussed above , the brightest components are in the form of filaments that are likely to be interacting strongly with the small - scale material from the galaxies , and these filaments will have pressures substantially higher than the lobe material as a whole ( see below , [ tails ] , for more discussion of this point ) . [ ridge - pressure ] is the ` ridge ' structure intrinsic to the system , or could it be a result of the interaction of the radio galaxy with an initially spherically symmetrical gas distribution ? there are two strong indications that the former is the case : firstly , the ridges align well with the local distribution of galaxies and starlight , which can not be affected by the radio galaxy , in both 3c285 and 3c442a ; secondly , in 3c442a , we observe material leaving the two central bright galaxies via the tails and merging with the ridge . quantitatively , we can compare the mass in the ridges ( or rather in the somewhat smaller spectral extraction regions used to derive temperatures and pressures ) with the masses of thermal material affected by the lobes . using the approximations of uniform density from the previous section , we find that the ` ridge ' gas masses are in the range @xmath320 to @xmath321 for 3c285 and @xmath322 to @xmath323 for 3c442a . using the @xmath246-model fits to the larger - scale thermal emission , we find that for 3c285 the ridge mass is similar to , but somewhat greater than , the total mass of gas that would be present in the lobe regions if the lobes were not there : thus , since only a fraction of the displaced gas would be expected to end up in the ridges , it is essentially impossible for the radio lobes to be responsible for producing the ridge in 3c285 ( though of course here we have to assume that the distribution of the gas in the regions away from the lobes of the radio source now is similar to its undisturbed distribution ) . the constraints are less strong for 3c442a , with larger lobes , a denser thermal environment , and a smaller ridge mass : roughly @xmath324 of the displaced gas would be sufficient to produce the observed ridge . however , we know that in 3c442a at least some of the gas in the ridge did _ not _ come via this route , since some of it must have passed through the tails . _ some _ contribution from compressed , displaced gas would help to explain the overdensities seen to the n and s of the w lobe ( [ tail - fit ] and fig . [ 442-large ] ) ( although note that these are not included in our mass calculations ) . we conclude that the ridge structures in these two sources are largely or wholly independent of the presence of the radio lobes . our outline models of the evolution of the two radio sources are somewhat different , because we know that the formation of the ridge in 3c442a is still going on given the observations of tails of gas from the two central galaxies ( see [ tails ] , below ) while there is no evidence that there is ongoing gas stripping in 3c285 . 3c285 thus presents the simpler situation , and we consider it first . in this system we consider it entirely possible that the ridge was present in something like its current configuration before the radio activity began . it is possible , although the data do not require it , that some of the gas that now forms the ridge was stripped from the galaxies that merged to form the current host galaxy of 3c285 . whether this is true or not , we have seen that the ridge is in rough pressure equilibrium with the external group - scale gas , at least in the center of the group . the timescale for the relaxation of the ridge back towards a spherically symmetrical situation , assuming that the gravitational potential is spherically symmetric , is thus likely to be comparable to the sound - crossing time for the _ long _ axis of the ridge , i.e. a few @xmath325 years . if the gravitational potential is non - static , the relevant timescale is the gravitational relaxation time , whch could be longer still . since the expansion of the 3c285 lobes is likely to have been supersonic initially ( and may still just be supersonic at present ) the growth of the lobes to similar size scales can take place in a much shorter time , a few @xmath326 years , and so it seems consistent to suppose that the ridge has not evolved greatly while the lobes have expanded . the expanding lobes would initially be confined by ram pressure and so would expand preferentially into the lower - density group - scale medium . later , as the lobe internal pressure dropped , the ridge material would push any lobe material out of the center of the group , leading to the situation we now see , where the currently observed ridge is in rough pressure balance with lobes that avoid the central part of the system . the more complex situation in 3c442a is discussed in detail by @xcite . in outline , our suggested picture is that here a large , old radio source could well have been present _ before _ the start of the ongoing interaction that produced the presently visible ridge material . by stripping and disrupting the hot gas in the center of the group , the start of the interaction / merger between ngc 7236/7 may have terminated the energy supply to the lobes . in any case , the resulting ridge has now largely driven the lobe material out of the center of the group , although the interaction with radio filaments ( see [ tails ] below ) shows that this process is not yet complete . buoyancy will remove the remaining filaments on a relatively short timescale ( unless they are magnetically anchored to one or other of the galaxies ) , while the ridge may continue to expand , driving the radio lobes ahead of it , as the merger of the two galaxies proceeds to completion . crudely , the work done on the thermal material by the expanding radio galaxy ( @xmath327 ) may be estimated as @xmath328 , or @xmath329 for pressure balance . this estimate probably gives constraints that are of the right order of magnitude . for 3c285 the numbers are between @xmath322 and a few @xmath330 j , depending on whether the source is in pressure balance or mildly overpressured at the present time , while for 3c442a the energy input assuming rough pressure balance at the radio lobes is @xmath331 j. in both cases the energy stored in the lobes is 3 times this value ( we assume a relativistic equation of state ) . these numbers may be compared to the total energy ( @xmath332 ) of the thermal material in the groups ( neglecting the ridges ) integrated out to the radius of the edge of the lobes ( 150 kpc for 3c285 , 160 kpc for 3c442a ) . for 3c285 this thermal energy is @xmath333 j : thus the energy input by the lobes is certainly significant , and the total energy input by the source over its lifetime will be sufficient to unbind or move to large radii a large fraction of the currently existing group - scale gas . for 3c442a , with a denser medium and larger temperature , the thermal energy of the gas is @xmath334 j , so that the impact of the radio source is less relative to the existing thermal energy than in 3c285 : however , again , the total energy input , once the internal energy of the lobes is thermalized , should be very important . spectral aging ( via inverse - compton losses ) puts a limit on the lifetime of 3c442a of @xmath335 years , while in 3c285 we expect a lifetime of a few @xmath326 years from the dynamical arguments of the previous section . thus in both cases the rate of energy input is more than enough ( by 1 - 2 orders of magnitude ) to offset the radiative cooling of the group - scale gas given the bolometric luminosities determined in [ group - properties ] , although in the case of 3c442a some of that work probably comes not from the active nucleus but ( via the expansion of the ridge ) from the dissipation of the energy of the galaxy - galaxy merger . a significant minority of radio galaxies , particularly low - luminosity friis , have radio lobes that are apparently sharply truncated at an inner edge , as first pointed out by @xcite . the truncation means that in radio images there are well - defined sharp - edged gaps between pairs of radio lobes that typically contain no lobe - related radio emission . @xcite have compiled a sample of such objects , and suggest that the central gaps between the lobes are a result of hydrodynamical interactions with a _ cold _ thermal medium . while this may be true in some cases , our results show that asymmetrical structures in the hot phase of the igm can have the same effect . a few other radio galaxies with truncated lobes have x - ray observations , and while some ( e.g. , 3c33 , @xcite ; 3c227 , hardcastle et al.in prep . ) show no obvious signs of asymmetrical x - ray structure on scales comparable to the lobes , at least one other frii radio galaxy , 3c401 , has both elongated x - ray emission filling between the gap between the lobes @xcite , and , crucially , some evidence for elongation of the stellar population in the same e - w direction in _ hubble space telescope _ images @xcite , strongly suggesting that the ` ridge ' structure can not simply be a result of compression of pre - existing symmetrical gas in the cluster environment of the source . given the evidence that mergers are important in the environments of frii sources ( e.g. , * ? ? ? * ) it is possible that central gaps are related to interaction of the lobes with pre - existing or developing x - ray structures in many other cases . ` tail ' or ` fan'-like x - ray structures have been seen in other strongly interacting galaxy pairs . the twin tails in ngc 7236/7 ( fig.[442-centre ] ) are very similar in structure and physical size to those seen by @xcite in ngc 4782/3 , which consists of two interacting galaxies of similar mass ( one hosting the radio source 3c278 ) with a projected separation of around 13 kpc . the tails in the 3c278 system are overpressured with respect to the surrounding diffuse medium , implying that they originate in ram pressure stripping of the halos of the interacting ellipticals , and @xcite carried out a detailed analysis of the x - ray surface brightness around the leading edge of one of the galaxy profiles to estimate the approximate speed of motion of the galaxy relative to the igm . because both tails in 3c442a have some excess x - ray emission in front of the galaxies , we can not repeat the @xcite analysis for 3c442a , but we can make a less rigorous estimate by determining the pressure inside the tails . the tail of ngc 7237 has only a weak surface brightness gradient over the inner 40@xmath6 ( 20 kpc ) of its length , so we model the x - ray emission as a uniform cylinder of length 20 kpc and radius 7 kpc . our spectral fit to the tail ( [ tail - fit ] ) then gives a density of @xmath336 m@xmath337 and a pressure of @xmath338 pa ( where the dominant uncertainty comes from the small uncertainty on temperature ) . to explain why the two dominant galaxies of the group are being ram - pressure stripped _ now _ , rather than having being completely stripped at a much earlier stage of the group s evolution , we must assume that it is their current close interaction that is responsible for the stripping : in this case it is appropriate to compare their pressure and density to the external medium in the ridge , which ( as discussed above ) we infer to be made up primarily of previously stripped material , rather than the group - center hot gas : in any case , the tails are clearly embedded in the ridge . this comparison gives a density contrast of a factor 3.34.5 ( depending on the geometry assumed for the ridge , see [ ridge - pressure ] ) and a pressure contrast of a factor @xmath339 , assuming cylindrical geometry since that gives the closest pressure balance with the larger - scale medium . the tails in 3c442a are thus overpressured and the leading edge must be ram - pressure confined , consistent with the picture of @xcite following @xcite in adopting the relation of @xcite between pressure contrast and mach number @xmath340 , we find that this pressure contrast implies @xmath341 , or a speed with respect to the ridge material of @xmath342 km s@xmath1 . the models of merger dynamics by @xcite imply velocities @xmath343 km s@xmath1 , in good agreement with this result . away from the leading edge , we expect the tails to expand transversely into the medium of the ridge at the sound speed , giving rise to the short , stubby structures that are observed and possibly to the apparent flaring of the ngc 7236 tail ( fig.[442-centre ] ) if the filaments seen in the radio image are directly interacting with the tails , we expect that the pressure in the radio - emitting plasma will be comparable to the pressures in the tail . the radio filaments are marginally resolved in our highest - resolution radio images , with radii of 12 arcsec . we can use observed radio surface brightness per unit length to estimate that they would need to have a radius of @xmath344 ( 0.09 kpc ) for the _ minimum _ pressures to be comparable to the thermal pressure in the tails : this is probably inconsistent with the radio data for the southern filament , and almost certainly inconsistent with the data for the northern filament . however , if the pressure in the filaments exceeds the minimum pressure by the factor @xmath345 required in the lobes , then the radius must be @xmath346 , 0.8 kpc , for pressure balance with the brighter tail , which is similar to what we observe in the high - resolution radio images . thus it is plausible that the filaments are produced by direct interaction with the tails , as suggested by their positions ( fig.[442-centre ] ) . assuming that there are not strong variations in the ratio of magnetic field to electron energy density , the filaments must be overpressured with respect to the lobes in order to be visible at all , and so must be dynamically evolving structures . a model in which they are associated with the galaxies , which we know to be moving with respect to the radio plasma , is therefore _ a priori _ plausible . since the filaments lie to the sides of the x - ray tails ( fig . [ 442-centre ] ) they can not simply be a result of compression of the remaining central radio - emitting plasma by the moving galaxies . it is plausible that they arise in the shear layers between the stripped material in the tails and the external gas . we have presented _ chandra _ observations of the nearby radio galaxies 3c285 and 3c442a . the main results of the paper can be summarized as follows . * the large - scale environments of both sources are groups , consistent with earlier optical results . the groups have similar x - ray luminosities , physical sizes and @xmath246-model parameters , although the best - fitting temperature for 3c442a s group is hotter . both sources have elongated , 150-kpc scale excess x - ray emission which aligns with galaxies in the group , and which we refer to as the ridge . this excess x - ray emission is coincident with the regions in which there is little or no radio emission from the lobes . * using temperatures and pressures derived from the x - ray observations , we have shown that the pressure in the ridges in both sources , within the errors , is equal to or exceeds any plausible internal pressure in the lobes . thus the ridges are capable of driving , or having driven , the existing radio lobes out of the central regions of the source . * we have shown that there is direct quantitative evidence in the case of 3c285 ( [ origin ] ) , and strong qualitative evidence in the case of 3c442a , that the ridges are not the result of an interaction between pre - existing gas and the radio source , but must have arisen independently . in 3c442a , we see hot gas in the process of being stripped from the central interacting galaxies and merging into the larger - scale ridge , suggesting that the ridge has been formed by the stripping of the haloes of the two merging galaxies . in 3c285 , the optical observations strongly suggest that the host galaxy has recently merged with a gas - rich system , and there is a tidal interaction with a more distant galaxy , although there is no evidence that the ridge is currently being fed with hot gas ; it is thus possible ( though by no means required by the data ) that the ridge in 3c285 also has an origin in galaxy - galaxy interactions . we argue that interaction with similar elongated structures may be responsible for some of the observed central gaps in the lobes of other radio sources . a prediction of this picture is that there will be ridge structures in other groups that do _ not _ host large , powerful radio galaxies : so far few of these are known , but the group hosting ngc 5171 @xcite may be a good example . * our detailed view of the tails of hot gas associated with 3c442a allows us to estimate the mach number and speed of ngc 7237 ( the host of 3c442a ) with respect to the diffuse igm . we obtain results consistent with detailed modelling of the merger dynamics @xcite . the properties of the radio filaments at the center of 3c442a are consistent with their being formed by interaction with the tails of the two galaxies in the system . * the x - ray nuclei of the two sources have spectra that are consistent with what is expected for objects of their emission - line type . no convincing evidence for x - ray counterparts to compact radio features , such as jets or hotspots , is found , and we have shown that the previously claimed optical counterpart to the e hotspot of 3c285 is unlikely to be associated with the hotspot . x - ray emission is detected from the region of jet - induced star formation in 3c285 reported by @xcite . we gratefully acknowledge financial support for this work from the royal society ( research fellowship for mjh ) and nasa ( grants go5 - 6100x and nas8 - 03060 ) . the national radio astronomy observatory is a facility of the national science foundation operated under cooperative agreement by associated universities , inc . this research has made use of the nasa / ipac extragalactic database ( ned ) which is operated by the jet propulsion laboratory , california institute of technology , under contract with the national aeronautics and space administration . we thank an anonymous referee for helpful comments which enabled us to improve the presentation of the paper . acreman , d.m . , stevens , i.r . , ponman , t.j . , & sakelliou , i. , 2003 , , 341 , 1333 allen , m.g . , et al . , 2002 , , 139 , 411 baum , s.a . , heckman , t. , bridle , a. , van breugel , w. , & miley , g. , 1988 , , 68 , 643 birkinshaw , m. , laing , r.a . , & peacock , j.a . , 1981 , , 197 , 253 birkinshaw , m. , & worrall , d.m . , 1993 , , 412 , 568 brzan , l. , rafferty , d.a . , mcnamara , b.r . , wise , m.w . , & nulsen , p.e.j . , 2004 , , 607 , 800 bhringer , h. , voges , w. , fabian , a.c . , edge , a.c . , & neumann , d.m . , 1993 , , 264 , l25 borne , k.d . , 1988 , , 330 , 61 borne , k.d . , & hoessel , j.g . , 1988 , , 330 , 51 chiaberge , m. , et al . , 2005 , , 629 , 100 comins , n.f . , & owen , f.n . , 1991 , , 382 , 108 croston , j.h . , hardcastle , m.j . , birkinshaw , m. , & worrall , d.m . , 2003 , , 346 , 1041 croston , j.h . , birkinshaw , m. , hardcastle , m.j . , & worrall , d.m . , 2004 , , 353 , 879 croston , j.h . , hardcastle , m.j . , & birkinshaw , m. , 2005a , , 357 , 279 croston , j.h . , hardcastle , m.j . , harris , d.e . , belsole , e. , birkinshaw , m. , & worrall , d.m . , 2005b , , 626 , 733 danese , l. , de zotti , g. , & di tullio g. , 1980 , , 82 , 322 dunn , r.j.h . , fabian , a.c . , & taylor , g.b . , 2005 , , 364 , 1343 evans , d.a . , worrall , d.m . , hardcastle , m.j . , kraft , r.p . , & birkinshaw , m. , 2006 , , 642 , 96 fabbiano , g. , miller , l. , trinchieri , g. , longair , m. , & elvis , m. , 1984 , , 277 , 115 fanaroff , b.l . , & riley , j.m . , 1974 , , 167 , 31p feretti , l. , spazzoli , o. , gioia , i.m . , giovannini , g. , & gregorini , l. , 1990 , , 233 , 325 feretti , l. , perola , g.c . , & fanti , r. , 1992 , , 265 , 9 gehrels , n. , 1986 , , 303 , 336 gopal - krishna , wiita , p. , & 2000 , , 529 , 189 greenstein , j.l . , 1962 , , 135 , 679 hardcastle , m.j . , birkinshaw , m. , & worrall , d.m . , 1998 , , 294 , 615 hardcastle , m.j . , birkinshaw , m. , cameron , r. , harris , d.e . , looney , l.w . , & worrall , d.m . , 2002 , , 581 , 948 hardcastle , m.j . , evans , d.a . , & croston , j.h . , 2006 , , 370 , 1893 hardcastle , m.j . , harris , d.e . , worrall , d.m . , & birkinshaw , m. , 2004 , , 612 , 729 hardcastle , m.j . , sakelliou , i. , & worrall , d.m . , 2005 , , 359 , 1007 hardcastle , m.j . , worrall , d.m . , & birkinshaw , m. , 1998 , , 296 , 1098 hardcastle , m.j . , & worrall , d.m . , 1999 , , 309 , 969 hardcastle , m.j . , & worrall , d.m . , 2000 , , 319 , 562 heckman , t.m . , smith , e.p . , baum , s.a . , van breugel , w.j.m . , miley , g.k . , illingworth , g.d . , bothun , g.d . , & balick , b. , 1986 , , 311 , 526 helsdon , s.f . , & ponman , t.j . , 2000 , , 315 , 356 jenkins , c.j . , pooley , g.g . , & riley , j.m . , 1977 , , 84 , 61 jenkins , c.j . , & scheuer , p.a.g . , 1976 , , 174 , 327 kaiser , c.r . , & alexander , p. , 1997 , , 286 , 215 killeen , n.e.b . , bicknell , g.v . , & ekers , r.d . , 1988 , , 325 , 180 kraft , r.p . , vzquez , s. , forman , w.r . , jones , c. , murray , s.s . , hardcastle , m.j . , worrall , d.m . , & churazov , e. , 2003 , , 592 , 129 kraft , r.p . , hardcastle , m.j . , worrall , d.m . , & murray , s.s . , 2005 , , 622 , 149 kraft , r.p . , jones , c. , nulsen , p.e.j . , & hardcastle , m.j . , 2006 , , 640 , 762 kraft , r.p . , birkinshaw , m. , hardcastle , m.j . , evans , d.a . , croston , j.h . , worrall , d.m . , & murray , s.s . , 2007 , in press ( astro - ph/0701458 ) laing , r.a . , 1993 , in burgarella d. , livio m. , odea c.p . , eds , astrophysical jets , space telescope science institute symposium series 6 , cambridge university press , cambridge , p. 95 laing , r.a . , riley , j.m . , & longair , m.s . , 1983 , , 204 , 151 machacek , m. , kraft , r.p . , jones , c. , forman , w.r . , & hardcastle , m.j . , 2006 , submitted , astro - ph/0610904 mackay , c. , 1969 , , 145 , 31 martel , a.r . , et al . , 1999 , , 122 , 81 morganti , r. , fanti , r. , gioia , i.m . , harris , d.e . , parma , p. , & de ruiter h. , 1988 , , 189 , 11 osullivan , e. , forbes , d.a . , & ponman , t.j . , 2001 , , 328 , 461 osmond , j.p.f . , & ponman , t.j . , 2004 , , 350 , 1511 osmond , j.p.f . , ponman , t.j . , & finoguenov , a. , 2004 , , 355 , 11 ott , j. , walter , f. , & brinks , e. , 2005 , , 358 , 1453 reynolds , c.s . , brenneman , l.w . , & stocke , j.t . , 2005 , , 357 , 381 roche , n. , & eales , s.a . , 2000 , , 317 , 120 sakelliou , i. , 2000 , , 318 , 1164 sandage , a.r . , 1967 , , 150 , l145 sandage , a.r . , 1972 , , 178 , 25 saslaw , w.c . , tyson , j.a . , & crane , p. , 1978 , , 222 , 435 stark , gammie , c.f . , wilson , r.w . , bally , j. , linke , r.a . , heiles , c. , & hurwitz , m. , 1992 , , 79 , 77 taylor , g.b . , perley , r.a . , inoue , m. , kato , t. , tabara , h. , & aizu , k. , 1990 , , 360 , 41 van breugel w.j.m . , & dey , a. , 1993 , , 414 , 563 vron , p. , 1977 , , 30 , 131 vikhlinin , a. , markevitch , m. , & murray , s.s . , 2001 , , 551 , 160 worrall , d.m . , & birkinshaw , m. , 2000 , , 530 , 719 worrall , d.m . , birkinshaw , m. , & cameron , r.a . , 1995 , , 449 , 93 worrall , d.m . , birkinshaw , m. , & hardcastle , m.j . , 2001 , , 326 , l7 worrall , d.m . , kraft , r.p . , birkinshaw , m. , & hardcastle , m.j . , 2007 , l , 658 , in press ( astro - ph/0702411 ) Abstract:

Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.

Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered . Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video . Paper: fifteen years , the area of channel coding has been revolutionized by the practical realization of capacity - approaching coding schemes , initiated by the invention of turbo codes and their associated decoding algorithms in 1993 @xcite . a few years after the invention of the turbo coding schemes , researchers became aware that gallager s low - density parity - check ( ldpc ) block codes and message - passing iterative decoding , first introduced in @xcite , were also capable of capacity - approaching performance . the analysis and design of these coding schemes quickly attracted considerable attention in the literature , beginning with the work of wiberg @xcite , mackay and neal @xcite , and many others . an irregular version of ldpc codes was first introduced by luby _ _ in @xcite , and analytical tools were presented in @xcite to obtain performance limits for graph - based message - passing iterative decoding algorithms , such as those suggested by tanner @xcite . for many classes of channels , these tools have been successfully employed to design families of irregular ldpc codes that perform very well near capacity @xcite . moreover , for the binary erasure channel these tools have enabled the design of families of irregular ldpc codes that are not only capacity - approaching but in fact capacity - achieving ( see @xcite and references therein ) . the convolutional counterparts of ldpc block codes are ldpc convolutional codes . analogous to ldpc block codes , ldpc convolutional codes are defined by sparse parity - check matrices , which allow them to be decoded using iterative message - passing algorithms . recent studies have shown that ldpc convolutional codes are suitable for practical implementation in a number of different communication scenarios , including continuous transmission and block transmission in frames of arbitrary size @xcite . two major methods have been proposed in the literature for the construction of ldpc convolutional codes , two methods that in fact started the field of ldpc convolutional codes . the first method was proposed by tanner @xcite ( see also @xcite ) and exploits similarities between quasi - cyclic block codes and time - invariant convolutional codes . the second method was presented by jimnez - feltstr " om and zigangirov in @xcite and relies on a matrix - based unwrapping procedure to obtain the parity - check matrix of a periodically time - varying convolutional code from the parity - check matrix of a block code . @xmath0 the aims of this paper are threefold . first , we show that these two ldpc convolutional code construction methods , once suitably generalized , are in fact tightly connected . we establish this connection with the help of so - called graph covers . a second aim is to discuss a variety of ldpc convolutional code constructions . although the underlying principles are mathematically quite straightforward , it is important to understand how they can be applied to obtain convolutional codes with good performance and attractive encoder and decoder architectures . a third aim is to make progress towards a better understanding of where the observed `` convolutional gain '' comes from , and what its costs are in terms of decoder complexity . the paper is structured as follows . after some notational remarks in section [ sec : notation:1:basic ] , we discuss the basics of ldpc convolutional codes in section [ sec : ldpc : convolutional : codes:1 ] . in particular , in that section we give a first exposition of the ldpc convolutional code construction methods due to tanner and due to jimnez - feltstr " om and zigangirov . in section [ sec : graph : covers:1 ] we discuss two types of graph - cover code constructions and show how they can be used to connect the code construction methods due to tanner and due to jimnez - feltstr " om and zigangirov . based on these insights , section [ sec : variations : unwrapping:1 ] presents a variety of ldpc convolutional code constructions ( along with simulation results ) , and in section [ sec : other : ldpc : code : constructions:1 ] we mention some similarities and differences of these constructions compared to other recent code constructions in the literature . afterwards , in section [ sec : analysis ] we analyze some aspects of the constructed ldpc convolutional codes and discuss some possible reasons for the `` convolutional gain , '' before we conclude the paper in section [ sec : discussion ] . we use the following sets , rings , and fields : @xmath1 is the ring of integers ; @xmath2 is the set of non - negative integers ; @xmath3 is the field of size two ; @xmath4 $ ] is the ring of polynomials with coefficients in @xmath3 and indeterminate @xmath5 ; and @xmath6 / \langle x^r{-}1 \rangle}$ ] is the ring of polynomials in @xmath4 $ ] modulo @xmath7 , where @xmath8 is a positive integer . we also use the notational short - hand @xmath9}$ ] for @xmath6 / \langle x^r{-}1 \rangle}$ ] . by @xmath10 and @xmath9}^n$ ] , we mean , respectively , a row vector over @xmath3 of length @xmath11 and a row vector over @xmath9}$ ] of length @xmath11 . in the following , if @xmath12 is some matrix , then @xmath13_{j , i}$ ] denotes the entry in the @xmath14-th row and @xmath15-th column of @xmath12 . note that we use the convention that indices of vector entries start at @xmath16 ( and not at @xmath17 ) , with a similar convention for row and column indices of matrix entries . ( this comment applies also to semi - infinite matrices , which are defined such that the row and column index sets equal @xmath2 . ) the only exception to this convention are bi - infinite matrices , where the row and column index sets equal @xmath1 . finally , @xmath18 will denote the kronecker product of the matrices @xmath19 and @xmath20 . this section defines ldpc convolutional codes and discusses why they are interesting from an implementation perspective . afterwards , we review two popular methods of obtaining ldpc convolutional codes by unwrapping block codes . later in this paper , namely in section [ sec : graph : covers:1 ] , we will use graph covers to show how these two methods are connected , and in section [ sec : variations : unwrapping:1 ] we will see how these two methods can be implemented and combined to obtain ldpc convolutional codes with very good performance . a semi - infinite binary parity - check matrix as in at the top of this page defines a convolutional code @xmath21 as follows . namely , it is the set of semi - infinite sequences given by @xmath22 where @xmath23 denotes the transpose of a vector or of a matrix . we comment on several important aspects and properties of the code @xmath21 and its parity - check matrix @xmath24 . * if the submatrices @xmath25 , @xmath26 , @xmath27 , have size @xmath28 with @xmath29 , then @xmath21 is said to have ( design ) rate @xmath30 . * the parameter @xmath31 that appears in is called the syndrome former memory . it is an important parameter of @xmath21 because the maximal number of non - zero submatrices per block row of @xmath24 is upper bounded by @xmath32 . * the quantity @xmath33 is called the constraint length of @xmath21 . it measures the maximal width ( in symbols ) of the non - zero area of @xmath24 . gives only an upper bound on the maximal width ( in symbols ) of the non - zero area of @xmath24 , but this upper bound will be good enough for our purposes . ] * we do not require that for a given @xmath34 the submatrices @xmath35 are independent of @xmath36 , and so @xmath21 is in general a _ time - varying _ convolutional code . * if there is a positive integer @xmath37 such that @xmath38 for all @xmath34 and all @xmath39 , then @xmath37 is called the period of @xmath24 , and @xmath21 is _ periodically time - varying_. * if the period @xmath37 equals @xmath17 , then @xmath24 is called _ time - invariant _ , and the parity - check matrix can be simply written as @xmath40 . \label{eq : tipcc } \end{aligned}\ ] ] * if the number of ones in each row and column of @xmath24 is small compared to the constraint length @xmath41 , then @xmath21 is an ldpc convolutional code . * an ldpc convolutional code @xmath21 is called @xmath42-regular if , starting from the zeroth column , @xmath24 has @xmath43 ones in each column , and , starting from the @xmath44-th row , @xmath24 has @xmath45 ones in each row . if , however , there are no integers @xmath31 , @xmath43 , and @xmath45 such that @xmath21 is @xmath42-regular , then @xmath21 is called irregular . of course , there is some ambiguity in the above definition . namely , a periodically time - varying ldpc convolutional code with parameters @xmath37 , @xmath46 , and @xmath47 can also be considered to be a periodically time - varying ldpc convolutional code with parameters @xmath48 , @xmath49 , @xmath50 , and @xmath51 for any integer @xmath52 that divides @xmath37 . in particular , for @xmath53 we consider the code to be a time - invariant ldpc convolutional code with parameters @xmath54 and @xmath55 . an advantage of ldpc convolutional codes compared to their block code counterparts is the so - called `` fast encoding '' property . as a result of the diagonal shape of their parity - check matrices , many ldpc convolutional codes enjoy simple shift register based encoders . even randomly constructed ldpc convolutional codes can be formed in such a way as to achieve this feature without any loss in performance ( see , e.g. , @xcite ) . on the other hand , in order to have a simple encoding procedure for ldpc block codes , either the block code must have some sort of structure @xcite or the parity - check matrix must be changed to a more easily `` encodable '' form @xcite . the difficulty in constructing and decoding ldpc convolutional codes is dealing with the unbounded size of the parity - check matrix . this is overcome at the code construction step by considering only periodically time - varying or time - invariant codes . the code construction problem is therefore reduced to designing just one period of the parity - check matrix . for decoding , the most obvious approach is to terminate the encoder and to employ message - passing iterative decoding based on the complete tanner graph representation of the parity - check matrix of the code . although this would be straightforward to implement using a standard ldpc block code decoder , it would be wasteful of resources , since the resulting ( very large ) block decoder would not be taking advantage of two important aspects of the convolutional structure : namely , that decoding can be done continuously without waiting for an entire terminated block to be received and that the distance between two variable nodes that are connected to the same check node is limited by the size of the syndrome former memory . in order to take advantage of the convolutional nature of the parity - check matrix , a continuous sliding window message - passing iterative decoder that operates on a window of size @xmath56 variable nodes , where @xmath57 is the number of decoding iterations to be performed , can be implemented , similar to a viterbi decoder with finite path memory @xcite . this window size is chosen since , in a single iteration , messages from variable ( or check ) nodes can be passed across a span of only one constraint length . thus , in @xmath57 iterations , messages can propagate only over a window of size @xmath57 constraint length . ( see also the recent paper by papaleo _ _ @xcite , which investigates further reducing the window size for codes operating on a binary erasure channel ( bec ) . ) another simplification is achieved by exploiting the fact that a single decoding iteration of two variable nodes that are at least @xmath32 time units apart can be performed independently , since the corresponding bits can not participate in the same parity - check equation . this allows the parallelization of the @xmath57 iterations by employing @xmath57 _ independent identical processors _ working on different regions of the parity - check matrix simultaneously , resulting in the parallel pipeline decoding architecture introduced in @xcite . the pipeline decoder outputs a continuous stream of decoded data after an initial decoding delay of @xmath58 received symbols . the operation of this decoder on the tanner graph of a simple time - invariant rate-@xmath59 convolutional code with @xmath60 and @xmath61 is illustrated in figure [ fig : decoder ] . is usually much larger than typical values of @xmath41 for `` classical '' convolutional codes . therefore the value @xmath61 of the convolutional code shown in figure [ fig : decoder ] is not typical for the codes considered in this paper . ] although the pipeline decoder is capable of fully parallelizing the iterations by using @xmath57 independent identical processors , employing a large number of hardware processors might not be desirable in some applications . in such cases , fewer processors ( even one processor ) can be scheduled to perform subsets of iterations , resulting in a serial looping architecture @xcite with reduced throughput . this ability to balance the processor load and decoding speed dynamically is especially desirable where very large ldpc convolutional codes must be decoded with limited available on - chip memory . further discussion on the implementation aspects of the pipeline decoder can be found in @xcite . in this subsection we discuss two approaches for deriving convolutional codes from block codes , in particular for deriving ldpc convolutional codes from ldpc block codes . the first technique will be the unwrapping due to tanner and the second will be the unwrapping due to jimnez - feltstrm and zigangirov ( jfz ) . in section [ sec : graph : covers:1 ] we will see , with the help of graph covers , how these two seemingly different unwrapping techniques are connected with each other . the term _ unwrapping _ , in particular unwrapping a quasi - cyclic block code to obtain a time - invariant convolutional code , was first introduced in a paper by tanner @xcite ( see also @xcite ) . that paper describes a link between quasi - cyclic block codes and time - invariant convolutional codes and shows that the free distance of the unwrapped convolutional code can not be smaller than the minimum distance of the underlying quasi - cyclic code . this idea was later extended in @xcite . consider the quasi - cyclic block code @xmath62 defined by the polynomial parity - check matrix @xmath63 of size @xmath64 , i.e. , @xmath65}^n \bigm| { { { { \bm{h}}}}_{\mathrm{qc}}^{(r)}}(x ) \cdot { { { { \bm{v}}}}}(x)^{\mathsf{t}}= { { { \bm{0}}}}^{\mathsf{t}}\bigr\}.\end{aligned}\ ] ] here the polynomial operations are performed modulo @xmath7 . the tanner unwrapping technique is simply based on dropping these modulo computations . more precisely , with a quasi - cyclic block code @xmath62 we associate the convolutional code @xmath66^n \bigm| { { { { \bm{h}}}}_{\mathrm{conv}}}(d ) \cdot { { { { \bm{v}}}}}(d)^{\mathsf{t}}= { { { \bm{0}}}}^{\mathsf{t}}\bigr\}\end{aligned}\ ] ] with polynomial parity - check matrix @xmath67 here the change of indeterminate from @xmath5 to @xmath68 indicates the lack of the modulo @xmath69 operations . ( note that in we assume that the exponents appearing in the polynomials in @xmath63 are between @xmath16 and @xmath70 inclusive . ) it can easily be seen that any codeword @xmath71 in @xmath72 maps to a codeword @xmath73 in @xmath62 through @xmath74 a process which was described in @xcite as the wrapping around of a codeword in the convolutional code into a codeword in the quasi - cyclic code . the inverse process was described as unwrapping . having introduced the unwrapping technique due to tanner , we move on to discuss the unwrapping technique due to jfz @xcite , which is another way to unwrap a block code to obtain a convolutional code . the basic idea is best explained with the help of an example . [ example : unwrap:1 ] consider the parity - check matrix with size @xmath75 , of a rate-@xmath76 block code . as indicated above , we can take a pair of scissors and `` cut '' the parity - check matrix into two pieces , whereby the cutting pattern is such that we repeatedly move @xmath77 units to the right and then @xmath78 unit down . having applied this `` diagonal cut , '' we repeatedly copy and paste the two parts to obtain the bi - infinite matrix shown in figure [ fig : jjj:1 ] . this new matrix can be seen as the parity - check matrix of ( in general ) a periodically time - varying convolutional code ( here the period is @xmath79 ) . it is worth observing that this new matrix has the same row and column weights as the matrix that we started with . rows are reduced . ] this example can be formalized easily . namely , starting with an @xmath64 parity - check matrix @xmath80 of some block code , let @xmath81 . then the `` diagonal cut '' is performed by alternately moving @xmath82 units to the right and then @xmath83 units down ( i.e. , @xmath84 . the resulting convolutional code has rate @xmath85 , syndrome former memory @xmath86 , constraint length @xmath87 , and period @xmath88 . analogous to the comment at the end of section [ sec : definition : ldpc : conv : codes:1 ] , it is also possible to cut the matrix @xmath80 in larger step sizes , e.g. , moving @xmath89 units to the right and @xmath90 units down , for any integer @xmath52 that divides @xmath91 , thereby obtaining a periodically time - varying convolutional code with rate @xmath92 , syndrome former memory @xmath93 , constraint length @xmath94 , and period @xmath95 . ( see also the discussion in section [ sec : time : varying : ldpc : convolutional : codes:1 ] . ) in the rest of this paper , the term `` jfz unwrapping technique '' will also stand for the following generalization of the above procedure . namely , starting with a length-@xmath11 block code @xmath96 defined by some size-@xmath97 parity - check matrix @xmath80 , i.e. , @xmath98 we write @xmath80 as the sum @xmath99 of a collection of matrices @xmath100 . the convolutional code @xmath21 is then defined to be @xmath101 where @xmath102 referring to the notation introduced in section [ sec : definition : ldpc : conv : codes:1 ] , the matrix @xmath24 is the parity - check matrix of a time - invariant convolutional code . however , depending on the decomposition of @xmath80 and the internal structure of the terms in that decomposition , the matrix @xmath24 can also be ( and very often is ) viewed as the parity - check matrix of a time - varying convolutional code with non - trivial period @xmath37 . in order to illustrate the generalization of the jfz unwrapping technique that we have introduced in the last paragraph , observe that decomposing @xmath80 from example [ example : unwrap:1 ] as @xmath103 with yields a convolutional code with parity - check matrix @xmath24 whose bi - infinite version equals the matrix shown in figure [ fig : jjj:1 ] . having formally introduced ldpc convolutional codes in the previous section , we now turn our attention to the main tool of this paper , namely graph covers . [ def : graph : cover:1 ] a _ cover _ of a graph @xmath104 with vertex set @xmath105 and edge set @xmath106 is a graph @xmath107 with vertex set @xmath108 and edge set @xmath109 , along with a surjection @xmath110 which is a graph homomorphism ( i.e. , @xmath111 takes adjacent vertices of @xmath107 to adjacent vertices of @xmath104 ) such that for each vertex @xmath112 and each @xmath113 , the neighborhood @xmath114 of @xmath115 is mapped bijectively to @xmath116 . a cover is called an _ @xmath117-cover _ , where @xmath117 is a positive integer , if @xmath118 for every vertex @xmath119 in @xmath105 . is also known as the degree of the cover . ( not to be confused with the degree of a vertex . ) ] these graph covers will be used for the construction of new tanner graphs from old tanner graphs , in particular for the construction of tanner graphs that represent ldpc convolutional codes . more specifically , this section starts by discussing two simple methods to specify a graph cover , which will be called graph - cover construction 1 ( * gcc1 * ) and graph - cover construction 2 ( * gcc2 * ) . although they yield isomorphic tanner graphs , and therefore equivalent codes , it is convenient to have both methods at hand . as we will see , interesting classes of tanner graphs can be obtained by repeatedly applying these graph - cover constructions , by mixing them , and by suitably shortening the resulting codes . moreover , these two graph - cover constructions will allow us to exhibit a connection between the tanner and the jfz unwrapping techniques . let @xmath120 be an @xmath121 matrix over @xmath2 . with such a matrix we can associate a tanner graph @xmath122 , where we draw @xmath123 variable nodes , @xmath124 check nodes , and where there are @xmath125_{j , i}$ ] edges from the @xmath15-th variable node to the @xmath14-th check node . given the role that the matrix @xmath120 will play subsequently , we follow @xcite and call the matrix @xmath120 a proto - matrix and the corresponding graph @xmath122 a proto - graph . the next definition introduces * gcc1 * and * gcc2 * , two ways to specify graph covers that will be used throughout the rest of the paper .. ] [ def : graph : cover : construction:1 ] for some positive integers @xmath124 and @xmath123 , let @xmath126 be a proto - matrix . we also introduce the following objects : * for some finite set @xmath127 , let @xmath128 be a collection of matrices such that @xmath129 , @xmath130 , and such that @xmath131 . * for some positive integer @xmath8 , let @xmath132 be a collection of size-@xmath133 permutation matrices . i.e. , for every @xmath130 , the matrix @xmath134 is such that it contains one `` @xmath17 '' per column , one `` @xmath17 '' per row , and `` @xmath16 ' 's otherwise . based on the collection of matrices @xmath135 and the collection of matrices @xmath136 , there are two common ways of defining a graph cover of the tanner graph @xmath122 . ( in the following expressions , @xmath137 is the identity matrix of size @xmath138 . ) * * graph - cover construction 1 ( * gcc1 * ) . * consider the intermediary matrix @xmath139 whose tanner graph @xmath140 consists of @xmath8 disconnected copies of @xmath122 . this is an @xmath8-fold cover of @xmath122 , albeit a rather trivial one . in order to obtain an interesting @xmath8-fold graph cover of @xmath120 , for each @xmath130 , we replace @xmath141 by @xmath142 , i.e. , we define @xmath143 * * graph - cover construction 2 ( * gcc2 * ) * consider the intermediary matrix @xmath144 whose tanner graph @xmath145 consists of @xmath8 disconnected copies of @xmath122 . this is an @xmath8-fold cover of @xmath122 , albeit a rather trivial one . in order to obtain an interesting @xmath8-fold graph cover of @xmath120 , for each @xmath130 , we replace @xmath146 by @xmath147 , i.e. , we define @xmath148 if all the matrices @xmath136 are circulant matrices , then the graph covers @xmath149 and @xmath150 will be called cyclic covers of @xmath122 . one can verify that the two graph - cover constructions in definition [ def : graph : cover : construction:1 ] are such that the matrix @xmath151 , after a suitable reordering of the rows and columns , equals the matrix @xmath152 . and @xmath153 are permutation equivalent , i.e. , there is a pair of permutation matrices @xmath154 such that @xmath155 . of course , for this to work , the pair @xmath156 must be independent of @xmath130 , i.e. , dependent only on the size of the matrices @xmath135 and @xmath157 . such a @xmath154 pair can easily be found . ] this implies that @xmath149 and @xmath150 are isomorphic graphs ; nevertheless , it is helpful to define both types of constructions . the following examples will help us to better understand how * gcc1 * and * gcc2 * can be used to obtain interesting classes of tanner graphs , and , in particular , how the resulting graph - cover constructions can be visualized graphically . although these examples are very concrete , they are written such that they can be easily generalized . [ ex : graph : cover : construction:1 ] consider the proto - matrix @xmath158 with @xmath159 and @xmath160 , and whose tanner graph @xmath122 is shown in figure [ fig : graph : cover : constructions:1](a ) . let @xmath161 , and let the collection of matrices @xmath162 be given by @xmath163 , where for each @xmath164 and each @xmath165 the matrix @xmath166 is defined as follows @xmath167_{j',i ' } & { \triangleq}\begin{cases } [ { { { { \bm{a}}}}}]_{j',i ' } & \text{if $ ( j',i ' ) = ( j , i)$ } \\ 0 & \text{otherwise } \end{cases}. \end{aligned}\ ] ] moreover , let @xmath168 , and let the collection of matrices @xmath157 be given by @xmath169 , where @xmath170 , @xmath171 , @xmath172 , @xmath173 , @xmath174 , @xmath175 , and where @xmath176 is an @xmath177 times left - shifted identity matrix of size @xmath178 . * using * gcc1 * , we obtain the matrices @xmath179 { { { { \bm{b}}}}}&= \begin{bmatrix } { { { { \bm{i}}}}}_1 & { { { { \bm{i}}}}}_2 & { { { { \bm{i}}}}}_4 \\ { { { { \bm{i}}}}}_6 & { { { { \bm{i}}}}}_5 & { { { { \bm{i}}}}}_3 \end{bmatrix } , \label{eq : ex : graph : cover : constructions:1:b:1 } \end{aligned}\ ] ] whose tanner graphs @xmath140 and @xmath149 , respectively , are shown in figure [ fig : graph : cover : constructions:1](b ) . * using * gcc2 * , we obtain the matrices @xmath180 \hskip-0.20 cm { \overline{{{{\bm{b}}}}}}&= \left [ \begin{array}{@{\;}c@{\;\;}c@{\;\;}c@{\;\;}c@{\;\;}c@{\;\;}c@{\;\;}c@{\ ; } } { { { \bm{0 } } } } & { { { { \bm{a}}}}}_{1,0 } & { { { { \bm{a}}}}}_{1,1 } & { { { { \bm{a}}}}}_{0,2 } & { { { { \bm{a}}}}}_{1,2 } & { { { { \bm{a}}}}}_{0,1 } & { { { { \bm{a}}}}}_{0,0 } \\ { { { { \bm{a}}}}}_{0,0 } & { { { \bm{0 } } } } & { { { { \bm{a}}}}}_{1,0 } & { { { { \bm{a}}}}}_{1,1 } & { { { { \bm{a}}}}}_{0,2 } & { { { { \bm{a}}}}}_{1,2 } & { { { { \bm{a}}}}}_{0,1 } \\ { { { { \bm{a}}}}}_{0,1 } & { { { { \bm{a}}}}}_{0,0 } & { { { \bm{0 } } } } & { { { { \bm{a}}}}}_{1,0 } & { { { { \bm{a}}}}}_{1,1 } & { { { { \bm{a}}}}}_{0,2 } & { { { { \bm{a}}}}}_{1,2 } \\ { { { { \bm{a}}}}}_{1,2 } & { { { { \bm{a}}}}}_{0,1 } & { { { { \bm{a}}}}}_{0,0 } & { { { \bm{0 } } } } & { { { { \bm{a}}}}}_{1,0 } & { { { { \bm{a}}}}}_{1,1 } & { { { { \bm{a}}}}}_{0,2 } \\ { { { { \bm{a}}}}}_{0,2 } & { { { { \bm{a}}}}}_{1,2 } & { { { { \bm{a}}}}}_{0,1 } & { { { { \bm{a}}}}}_{0,0 } & { { { \bm{0 } } } } & { { { { \bm{a}}}}}_{1,0 } & { { { { \bm{a}}}}}_{1,1 } \\ { { { { \bm{a}}}}}_{1,1 } & { { { { \bm{a}}}}}_{0,2 } & { { { { \bm{a}}}}}_{1,2 } & { { { { \bm{a}}}}}_{0,1 } & { { { { \bm{a}}}}}_{0,0 } & { { { \bm{0 } } } } & { { { { \bm{a}}}}}_{1,0 } \\ { { { { \bm{a}}}}}_{1,0 } & { { { { \bm{a}}}}}_{1,1 } & { { { { \bm{a}}}}}_{0,2 } & { { { { \bm{a}}}}}_{1,2 } & { { { { \bm{a}}}}}_{0,1 } & { { { { \bm{a}}}}}_{0,0 } & { { { \bm{0 } } } } \end{array } \right]\!\ ! , \label{eq : ex : graph : cover : constructions:1:ob:1 } \end{aligned}\ ] ] whose tanner graphs @xmath145 and @xmath150 , respectively , are shown in figure [ fig : graph : cover : constructions:1](c ) . note that all the block rows and all the block columns sum ( in @xmath1 ) to @xmath120 . ( this observation holds in general , not just for this example . ) we would like to add two comments with respect to the above example . first , instead of defining @xmath176 to be an @xmath177 times _ left_-shifted identity matrix of size @xmath138 , we could have defined @xmath176 to be an @xmath177 times _ right_-shifted identity matrix of size @xmath181 . compared to the matrices and graphs described above , such a change in definition would yield ( in general ) different matrices but isomorphic graphs . second , we note that * gcc2 * was termed the `` copy - and - permute '' construction by thorpe and his co - workers . this terminology stems from the visual appearance of the procedure : namely , in going from figure [ fig : graph : cover : constructions:1](a ) to figure [ fig : graph : cover : constructions:1](c)(top ) we copy the graph several times , and in going from figure [ fig : graph : cover : constructions:1](c)(top ) to figure [ fig : graph : cover : constructions:1](c)(bottom ) we permute the edges of the graph , where the permutations are done within the sets of edges that have the same pre - image in figure [ fig : graph : cover : constructions:1](a ) . [ rem : graph : cover : construction:1:variation:1 ] consider again the matrices that were constructed in example [ ex : graph : cover : construction:1 ] , in particular the matrix @xmath120 in and its @xmath8-fold cover matrix @xmath151 in . because all matrices in the matrix collection @xmath136 are circulant , @xmath149 represents a cyclic cover of @xmath182 . clearly , when seen over @xmath183 , the matrix @xmath184 is the parity - check matrix of a quasi - cyclic binary linear block code @xmath185 using the well - known isomorphism between the addition and multiplication of circulant matrices over @xmath183 and the addition and multiplication of elements of the ring @xmath9}$ ] , this code can be written equivalently as @xmath186}^{{n_{{{{\bm{a } } } } } } } \bigm| { { { { \bm{h}}}}_{\mathrm{qc}}^{(r)}}(x ) \cdot { { { { \bm{v}}}}}(x)^{\mathsf{t}}= { { { \bm{0}}}}^{\mathsf{t}}\bigr\ } \end{aligned}\ ] ] with @xmath187 as noted above , the graphs @xmath149 and @xmath150 that are constructed in definition [ def : graph : cover : construction:1 ] are isomorphic . applying this observation to example [ ex : graph : cover : construction:1 ] , the matrix @xmath188 with @xmath152 from is therefore the parity - check matrix of a binary linear block code @xmath189 that is equivalent to @xmath62 , i.e. , the codewords of @xmath190 can be obtained from the codewords of @xmath62 by a suitable reordering of the codeword components . in terms of the matrices @xmath191 , which also appear in the matrix @xmath152 in , one can verify that the polynomial parity - check matrix @xmath63 can be written as @xmath192 . besides defining finite graph covers , we can also define infinite graph covers , as illustrated in the following examples . these infinite graph covers will be crucial towards defining tanner graphs of convolutional codes . [ ex : graph : cover : construction:1:infinite:1 ] we continue example [ ex : graph : cover : construction:1 ] . however , besides keeping the proto - matrix @xmath120 and the collection of matrices @xmath193 , we consider a different collection of matrices @xmath194 . namely , we set @xmath195 , @xmath196 , @xmath197 , @xmath198 , @xmath199 , @xmath200 . here @xmath201 is a bi - infinite toeplitz matrix with zeros everywhere except for ones in the @xmath177-th diagonal below the main diagonal , i.e. , @xmath202_{j , i } = 1 $ ] if @xmath203 and @xmath202_{j , i } = 0 $ ] otherwise . e.g. , @xmath204 where for clarity we have underlined the entries of the main diagonal . * using * gcc1 * , we obtain the matrices @xmath205 and @xmath206 the tanner graph @xmath140 , which is depicted in figure [ fig : graph : cover : constructions:1:variation:2](b)(top ) , is similar to the corresponding tanner graph in figure [ fig : graph : cover : constructions:1](b)(top ) , but with bi - infinitely many independent components . analogously , the tanner graph @xmath149 , which is depicted in figure [ fig : graph : cover : constructions:1:variation:2](b)(bottom ) , is similar to the tanner graph shown in figure [ fig : graph : cover : constructions:1](b)(bottom ) , but instead of cyclically wrapped edge connections , the edge connections are infinitely continued on both sides . * using * gcc2 * , we obtain the matrices @xmath207 and @xmath208\!. \label{eq : ex : graph : cover : constructions:1:variation:2:ob:1 } \end{aligned}\ ] ] the tanner graph @xmath145 , which is depicted in figure [ fig : graph : cover : constructions:1:variation:2](c)(top ) , is similar to the corresponding tanner graph in figure [ fig : graph : cover : constructions:1](c)(top ) , but with bi - infinitely many independent components . analogously , the tanner graph @xmath150 , which is depicted in figure [ fig : graph : cover : constructions:1:variation:2](c)(bottom ) , is similar to the tanner graph shown in figure [ fig : graph : cover : constructions:1](c)(bottom ) , but instead of cyclically wrapped edge connections , the edge connections are infinitely continued on both sides . although it is tempting to replace in example [ ex : graph : cover : construction:1:infinite:1 ] the bi - infinite toeplitz matrices @xmath201 ( whose row and column index sets equal @xmath1 ) by semi - infinite toeplitz matrices ( whose row and column index sets equal @xmath2 ) , note that the resulting tanner graphs @xmath149 and @xmath150 would then in general not be graph covers of @xmath122 . this follows from the fact that semi - infinite toeplitz matrices are not permutation matrices ( except for @xmath209 ) , and so some vertex degrees of @xmath149 and @xmath150 would not equal the corresponding vertex degrees in @xmath122 . [ rem : graph : cover : connections:1 ] it turns out that the tanner graphs in figure [ fig : graph : cover : constructions:1:variation:2 ] are infinite graph covers of the tanner graphs in figure [ fig : graph : cover : constructions:1 ] . more precisely , the tanner graphs @xmath140 , @xmath149 , @xmath145 , @xmath150 in figure [ fig : graph : cover : constructions:1:variation:2 ] are graph covers of the corresponding tanner graphs @xmath140 , @xmath149 , @xmath145 , @xmath150 in figure [ fig : graph : cover : constructions:1 ] . for the tanner graphs @xmath140 in figures [ fig : graph : cover : constructions:1](b)(top ) and [ fig : graph : cover : constructions:1:variation:2](b)(top ) and the tanner graphs @xmath145 in figures [ fig : graph : cover : constructions:1](c)(top ) and [ fig : graph : cover : constructions:1:variation:2](c)(top ) , this statement is easily verified by inspection . to verify that the tanner graph @xmath150 in figure [ fig : graph : cover : constructions:1:variation:2](c)(bottom ) is a graph cover of @xmath150 in figure [ fig : graph : cover : constructions:1](c)(bottom ) , we apply * gcc2 * with proto - matrix @xmath120 , with resulting matrix @xmath152 , with the set @xmath127 , with the collection of matrices @xmath210 , and with the collection of permutation matrices @xmath211 as follows . namely , we let the proto - matrix @xmath120 be the matrix from ( there denoted by @xmath152 ) , we let the resulting matrix @xmath152 be the matrix in ( there denoted by @xmath152 ) , we define @xmath212 , we select @xmath213 , \label{eq : rem : graph : cover : connections:1:a:0 } \\[0.25 cm ] { { { { \bm{a}}}}}_1 & = \left [ \begin{array}{@{\;}c@{\;\;}c@{\;\;}c@{\;\;}c@{\;\;}c@{\;\;}c@{\;\;}c@{\ ; } } { { { \bm{0 } } } } & { { { { \bm{a}}}}}_{1,0 } & { { { { \bm{a}}}}}_{1,1 } & { { { { \bm{a}}}}}_{0,2 } & { { { { \bm{a}}}}}_{1,2 } & { { { { \bm{a}}}}}_{0,1 } & { { { { \bm{a}}}}}_{0,0 } \\ { { { \bm{0 } } } } & { { { \bm{0 } } } } & { { { { \bm{a}}}}}_{1,0 } & { { { { \bm{a}}}}}_{1,1 } & { { { { \bm{a}}}}}_{0,2 } & { { { { \bm{a}}}}}_{1,2 } & { { { { \bm{a}}}}}_{0,1 } \\ { { { \bm{0 } } } } & { { { \bm{0 } } } } & { { { \bm{0 } } } } & { { { { \bm{a}}}}}_{1,0 } & { { { { \bm{a}}}}}_{1,1 } & { { { { \bm{a}}}}}_{0,2 } & { { { { \bm{a}}}}}_{1,2 } \\ { { { \bm{0 } } } } & { { { \bm{0 } } } } & { { { \bm{0 } } } } & { { { \bm{0 } } } } & { { { { \bm{a}}}}}_{1,0 } & { { { { \bm{a}}}}}_{1,1 } & { { { { \bm{a}}}}}_{0,2 } \\ { { { \bm{0 } } } } & { { { \bm{0 } } } } & { { { \bm{0 } } } } & { { { \bm{0 } } } } & { { { \bm{0 } } } } & { { { { \bm{a}}}}}_{1,0 } & { { { { \bm{a}}}}}_{1,1 } \\ { { { \bm{0 } } } } & { { { \bm{0 } } } } & { { { \bm{0 } } } } & { { { \bm{0 } } } } & { { { \bm{0 } } } } & { { { \bm{0 } } } } & { { { { \bm{a}}}}}_{1,0 } \\ { { { \bm{0 } } } } & { { { \bm{0 } } } } & { { { \bm{0 } } } } & { { { \bm{0 } } } } & { { { \bm{0 } } } } & { { { \bm{0 } } } } & { { { \bm{0 } } } } \end{array } \right ] , \label{eq : rem : graph : cover : connections:1:a:1 } \end{aligned}\ ] ] and we select @xmath214 and @xmath215 , where @xmath201 was defined in example [ ex : graph : cover : construction:1:infinite:1 ] . clearly , @xmath216 . would be put in @xmath217 . ] with this we have @xmath218 \!\ ! , \end{aligned}\ ] ] and one can verify that this matrix equals the matrix in ( there denoted by @xmath152 ) , which means that @xmath150 is indeed an infinite cover of @xmath122 . we remark that , interestingly , in this process we have shown how a certain * gcc2 * graph cover of a proto - matrix can be written as a * gcc2 * graph cover of a certain * gcc2 * graph cover of that proto - matrix . finally , a similar argument shows that the tanner graph @xmath149 in figure [ fig : graph : cover : constructions:1:variation:2](b)(top ) is a graph cover of the tanner graph in figure [ fig : graph : cover : constructions:1](b)(top ) , also denoted by @xmath149 . there are many other ways of writing a proto - matrix @xmath120 as a sum of a collection of matrices @xmath135 . the next example discusses two such possibilities . [ ex : graph : cover : construction:2 ] consider the proto - matrix @xmath219 that is shown in figure [ fig : graph : cover : constructions:2](a ) , and that also appeared in example [ example : unwrap:1 ] . its tanner graph @xmath122 is @xmath220-regular , i.e. , all variable nodes have degree @xmath221 and all check nodes have degree @xmath222 . let @xmath223 , and consider the collection of matrices @xmath136 with @xmath214 and @xmath215 , where the matrices @xmath209 and @xmath224 are defined as in example [ ex : graph : cover : construction:1:infinite:1 ] . in the following , we look at two different choices of the collection of matrices @xmath162 . * figure [ fig : graph : cover : constructions:2](c ) shows a typical part of the matrix @xmath152 that is obtained when * gcc2 * is used to construct a graph cover of @xmath120 with the collection of matrices @xmath225 defined as shown in figure [ fig : graph : cover : constructions:2](a ) . * figure [ fig : graph : cover : constructions:2](d ) shows a typical part of the matrix @xmath152 when * gcc2 * is used to construct a graph cover of @xmath120 with the collection of matrices @xmath128 defined as shown in figure [ fig : graph : cover : constructions:2](b ) . overall , because of the choice of the collection @xmath226 , the support of both matrices @xmath152 possesses a banded diagonal structure . moreover , the different choices of the collection @xmath162 leads to a somewhat narrower banded diagonal structure in the first case compared to the second case . the next example makes a crucial observation ; namely , it shows that the above graph - cover constructions can be applied repeatedly to obtain additional interesting classes of tanner graphs . [ ex : graph : cover : construction:3 ] starting with the proto - matrix @xmath227 from example [ ex : graph : cover : construction:1 ] , we consider two iterated graph - cover constructions . in the first case , we apply * gcc1 * and then * gcc2 * , and in the second case we apply * gcc2 * twice . * consider the matrix @xmath151 obtained from the matrix @xmath120 using * gcc1 * , like in example [ ex : graph : cover : construction:1 ] . the resulting matrix @xmath151 is shown in and will be called @xmath228 in this example , since it is considered to be a proto - matrix by itself , cf . figure [ fig : graph : cover : construction:3](a ) . based on the `` cutting line '' shown in figure [ fig : graph : cover : construction:3](a ) , we define the matrices @xmath229 and @xmath230 as follows : the non - zero part of @xmath229 equals the non - zero part of the lower triangular part of @xmath228 and the non - zero part of @xmath230 equals the non - zero part of the upper triangular part of @xmath228 . ( clearly , @xmath231 . ) applying the procedure from example [ ex : graph : cover : construction:2 ] , figure [ fig : graph : cover : construction:3](c ) shows a typical part of the matrix @xmath232 that is obtained when * gcc2 * is used to construct a graph cover of @xmath228 . * consider the graph - cover @xmath152 obtained from @xmath120 using * gcc2 * , like in example [ ex : graph : cover : construction:1 ] . the resulting matrix @xmath152 is shown in and will be called @xmath233 in this example , since it is considered to be a proto - matrix by itself , cf . figure [ fig : graph : cover : construction:3](b ) . based on the `` cutting line '' shown in figure [ fig : graph : cover : construction:3](b ) , we define the matrices @xmath234 and @xmath235 as follows : the non - zero part of @xmath234 equals the non - zero part of the lower triangular part of @xmath233 and the non - zero part of @xmath235 equals the non - zero part of the upper triangular part of @xmath233 . ( clearly , @xmath236 . ) applying the procedure from example [ ex : graph : cover : construction:2 ] , figure [ fig : graph : cover : construction:3](d ) shows a typical part of the matrix @xmath237 that is obtained when * gcc2 * is used to construct a graph cover of @xmath233 . we observe a large difference in the positions of the non - zero entries in @xmath232 and @xmath237 . * in the first case , the two graph - cover constructions are `` incompatible '' and the positions of the non - zero entries in @xmath232 follow a `` non - simple '' or `` pseudo - random '' pattern . as we will see in example [ ex : iterated : gcc : ldpc : code : construction:1 ] with the help of simulation results , such tanner graphs can lead to time - varying ldpc convolutional codes with very good performance . * in the second case , the two graph - cover constructions are `` compatible '' in the sense that @xmath237 can be obtained from the proto - matrix @xmath120 by applying * gcc2 * with suitable matrix collections @xmath135 and @xmath238 . as such , the positions of the non - zero entries of @xmath237 follow a relatively `` simple '' or `` non - random '' pattern , which leads to a time - invariant ldpc convolutional code . the above procedure of obtaining two matrices that add up to a matrix is called `` cutting a matrix '' . actually , we will also use this term if there is no simple cutting line , as in the above examples , and also if the matrix is written as the sum of more than two matrices ( cf . example [ example : unwrap:1 ] and the paragraphs after it ) . in section [ sec : unwrapping:1 ] we introduced two techniques , termed the tanner and the jfz unwrapping techniques , to derive convolutional codes from block codes . in this subsection we revisit these unwrapping techniques . in particular , we show how they can be cast in terms of graph covers and how the two unwrapping techniques are connected . because of the importance of the coding - theoretic notion of shortening @xcite for this subsection , we briefly revisit this concept . let @xmath239 be a parity - check matrix that defines some length-@xmath11 binary code @xmath240 . we say that the length-@xmath241 code @xmath242 is obtained by shortening @xmath240 at position @xmath15 if @xmath243 in terms of parity - check matrices , a possible parity - check matrix @xmath244 of @xmath242 is obtained by deleting the @xmath15-th column of @xmath239 . in terms of tanner graphs , this means that the tanner graph @xmath245 is obtained from @xmath246 by removing the @xmath15-th variable node , along with its incident edges . in the following , we will also use the term `` shortening '' to denote this graph modification procedure . now , to explain the tanner unwrapping technique in terms of graph covers , consider the quasi - cyclic block code @xmath62 defined by the polynomial parity - check matrix @xmath63 of size @xmath121 , i.e. , @xmath65}^{{n_{{{{\bm{a } } } } } } } \bigm| { { { { \bm{h}}}}_{\mathrm{qc}}^{(r)}}(x ) \cdot { { { { \bm{v}}}}}(x)^{\mathsf{t}}= { { { \bm{0}}}}^{\mathsf{t}}\bigr\},\end{aligned}\ ] ] where the polynomial operations are performed modulo @xmath7 ( see also remark [ rem : graph : cover : construction:1:variation:1 ] ) . as already mentioned in section [ sec : unwrapping:1 ] , the tanner unwrapping technique is simply based on dropping these modulo computations . more precisely , with a quasi - cyclic block code @xmath62 , we associate the convolutional code @xmath66^{{n_{{{{\bm{a } } } } } } } \bigm| { { { { \bm{h}}}}_{\mathrm{conv}}}(d ) \cdot { { { { \bm{v}}}}}(d)^{\mathsf{t}}= { { { \bm{0}}}}^{\mathsf{t}}\bigr\}\end{aligned}\ ] ] with polynomial parity - check matrix @xmath247 again , the change of indeterminate from @xmath5 to @xmath68 indicates the lack of modulo @xmath69 operations . in the following we will give , with the help of an example , two interpretations of the tanner unwrapping technique in terms of graph covers . [ ex : tanner : unwrapping:1:rev:1 ] unwrapping the quasi - cyclic block code @xmath62 that was considered in remark [ rem : graph : cover : construction:1:variation:1 ] , we obtain a rate-@xmath59 time - invariant convolutional code @xmath248^{{n_{{{{\bm{a } } } } } } } \bigm| { { { { \bm{h}}}}_{\mathrm{conv}}}(d ) \cdot { { { { \bm{v}}}}}(d)^{\mathsf{t}}= { { { \bm{0}}}}^{\mathsf{t}}\bigr\ } \end{aligned}\ ] ] with polynomial parity - check matrix @xmath249 consider now the infinite graph covers that were constructed in example [ ex : graph : cover : construction:1:infinite:1 ] using * gcc1 * , in particular @xmath149 . let @xmath250 be the set of codewords defined by the tanner graph @xmath149 . then the convolutional code @xmath72 is a shortened version of @xmath251 where all codeword bits corresponding to negative time indices have been shortened . therefore , the tanner graph of @xmath72 is given by the tanner graph in figure [ fig : graph : cover : constructions:1:variation:2](b)(bottom ) , where all bit nodes with negative time indices , along with their incident edges , are removed . clearly , this bit - node and edge removal process implies decreasing the degrees of some check nodes . in fact , some check nodes become obsolete , because their degree is decreased to zero . therefore , one interpretation of the tanner unwrapping technique in terms of graph covers is that the tanner graph of the convolutional code is obtained by taking a suitable graph cover of the same proto - graph that was used to construct the quasi - cyclic ldpc code , along with some suitable shortening . [ ex : tanner : unwrapping:1:rev:2 ] we continue remark [ rem : graph : cover : construction:1:variation:1 ] and example [ ex : tanner : unwrapping:1:rev:1 ] . clearly , in the same way as the block code @xmath190 is equivalent to the block code @xmath62 , we can define a code @xmath21 ( with parity - check matrix @xmath24 ) that is equivalent to @xmath72 . the observations in remark [ rem : graph : cover : connections:1 ] and example [ ex : tanner : unwrapping:1:rev:1 ] can then be used to show that the tanner graph of @xmath24 equals a graph cover of the tanner graph @xmath252 , along with some suitable shortening . therefore , the second interpretation of the tanner unwrapping in terms of graph covers is that the tanner graph of the convolutional code is obtained by taking a suitable graph cover of the tanner graph of the quasi - cyclic code , along with some suitable shortening . now turning our attention to the jfz unwrapping technique , recall from section [ sec : unwrapping:1 ] that this method is based on writing a parity - check matrix @xmath80 of some block code @xmath96 as the sum @xmath253 of a collection of matrices @xmath254 . the convolutional code is then defined to be @xmath255 where @xmath256 . \label{eq : code : c : conv : jfz : unwrapping:1:rev : pcm:1}\end{aligned}\ ] ] with the help of an example , we now explain how the jfz unwrapping technique can be cast in terms of graph - covers . [ ex : jfz : unwrapping:2:rev ] consider the infinite graph covers that were constructed using * gcc2 * in example [ ex : graph : cover : construction:1:infinite:1 ] , in particular @xmath150 . let @xmath257 be the set of valid assignments to the tanner graph @xmath150 . moreover , let @xmath258 , and let @xmath21 be defined as in . then the code @xmath21 is a shortened version of @xmath259 , where all codeword bits corresponding to negative time indices have been shortened . therefore , the tanner graph of @xmath21 is given by the tanner graph in figure [ fig : graph : cover : constructions:1:variation:2](c)(bottom ) , where all the bit nodes with negative time indices are shortened . in order to connect the unwrapping techniques due to tanner and due to jfz , we show now , with the help of an example , that in fact the unwrapping technique due to tanner can be seen as a _ special case _ of the unwrapping technique due to jfz . consider the quasi - cyclic block code defined by the parity - check matrix @xmath260 , where @xmath152 was defined in . applying the jfz unwrapping technique with the matrix decomposition @xmath261 , with @xmath217 defined in and @xmath262 defined in , @xmath24 turns out to equal a submatrix of @xmath152 in , namely the submatrix of @xmath152 where the row and column index set are equal to @xmath2 . however , the code defined by @xmath24 is equivalent to the code defined by the tanner unwrapping technique applied to the quasi - cyclic code defined by @xmath252 . therefore , the unwrapping technique due to jfz is more general . in fact , whereas the tanner unwrapping technique leads to _ time - invariant _ convolutional codes , the unwrapping technique due to jfz can , depending on the parity - check matrix decomposition and the internal structure of the terms in the decomposition , lead to _ time - varying _ convolutional codes with non - trivial period . despite the fact that the unwrapping technique due to tanner is a special case of the unwrapping technique due to jfz , it is nevertheless helpful to have both unwrapping techniques at hand , because sometimes one framework can be more convenient than the other . we will use both perspectives in the next section . we conclude this section with the following remarks . * although most of the examples in this section have regular bit node degree @xmath263 and regular check node degree @xmath221 , there is nothing special about this choice of bit and check node degrees ; any other choice would work equally well . * although all polynomial parity - check matrices that appear in this section contain only monomials , this is not required , i.e. , the developments in this section work equally well for polynomial parity - check matrices containing the zero polynomial , monomials , binomials , trinomials , and so on . * it can easily be verified that if the matrix @xmath120 in definition [ def : graph : cover : construction:1 ] contains only zeros and ones , then the graph covers constructed in * gcc1 * and * gcc2 * never have parallel edges . in particular , if @xmath120 is the parity - check matrix of a block code ( like in most examples in this paper ) , then the constructed graph covers never have parallel edges . + however , if @xmath120 contains entries that are larger than one , then there is the potential for the constructed graph covers to have parallel edges ; if parallel edges really appear depends then critically on the choice of the decomposition @xmath264 and the choice of the permutation matrices @xmath211 . an example of such a case is the tanner graph construction in section [ sec : ldpc : code : construction : lentmaier : kudekar:1 ] , where @xmath265 $ ] and where @xmath135 and @xmath266 are chosen such that parallel edges are avoided in the constructed graph cover . + we note that in the case of iterated graph - cover constructions it can make sense to have parallel edges in the intermediate graph covers . however , in the last graph - cover construction stage , parallel edges are usually avoided , because parallel edges in tanner graphs typically lead to a weakening of the code and/or of the message - passing iterative decoder . although the graph - cover constructions and unwrapping techniques that were discussed in sections [ sec : ldpc : convolutional : codes:1 ] and [ sec : graph : covers:1 ] are mathematically quite straightforward , it is important to understand how they can be applied to obtain ldpc convolutional codes with good performance and attractive encoder and decoder architectures . to that end , this section explores a variety of code design options and comments on some practical issues . it also proposes a new `` random '' unwrapping technique which leads to convolutional codes whose performance compares favorably to other codes with the same parameters . of course , other variations than the ones presented here are possible , in particular , by suitably combining some of the example constructions . the simulation results for the codes in this section plot the decoded bit error rate ( ber ) versus the signal - to - noise ratio ( snr ) @xmath267 and were obtained by assuming bpsk modulation and an additive white gaussian noise channel ( awgnc ) . all decoders were based on the sum - product algorithm @xcite and were allowed a maximum of 100 iterations , with the block code decoders employing a syndrome - check based stopping rule . for comparing the performance of unwrapped convolutional codes with their underlying block codes we will use the following metric . for a convolutional code constructed from an underlying block code , we define its `` convolutional gain '' to be the difference in snr required to achieve a particular ber with the convolutional code compared to achieving the same ber with the block code . the rest of this section is structured as follows . first we discuss the construction of some _ time - invariant _ ldpc convolutional codes based on the tanner unwrapping technique . in this context we make a simple observation about how the syndrome former memory can sometimes be reduced without changing the convolutional code . secondly , we present a construction of _ time - varying _ ldpc convolutional codes based on iterated graph - cover constructions . an important sub - topic here will be an investigation of the influence of the `` diagonal cut '' ( which is used to define a graph cover ) on the decoding performance . in this section we revisit a class of quasi - cyclic ldpc codes and their associated convolutional codes that was studied in @xcite . as we will see , they are instances of the quasi - cyclic code construction in example [ ex : graph : cover : construction:1 ] and remark [ rem : graph : cover : construction:1:variation:1 ] , and the corresponding convolutional code construction based on tanner s unwrapping technique in example [ ex : tanner : unwrapping:1:rev:1 ] . [ ex : tanner : qc : code:1 ] consider the regular proto - matrix @xmath268 with @xmath269 and @xmath270 . we apply * gcc1 * , as in example [ ex : graph : cover : construction:1 ] and remark [ rem : graph : cover : construction:1:variation:1 ] , with an interesting choice of permutation matrices first suggested by tanner @xcite that yields the parity - check matrix @xmath271 where as before @xmath176 is an @xmath177 times left - circularly shifted identity matrix of size @xmath138 and @xmath272 . the corresponding polynomial parity - check is @xmath273 the resulting quasi - cyclic @xmath274-regular ldpc block codes have block length @xmath275 . in particular , for @xmath276 , @xmath277 , and @xmath278 , we obtain codes of length @xmath279 , @xmath280 , and @xmath281 , respectively , whose simulated ber performance results are shown in figure [ fig : sims ] . the choice @xmath276 yields the well - known length-@xmath279 quasi - cyclic block code that was first introduced by tanner @xcite ( see also the discussion in @xcite ) . unwrapping these codes by the tanner unwrapping technique as in example [ ex : tanner : unwrapping:1:rev:1 ] , we obtain a rate-@xmath282 time - invariant convolutional code with @xmath283 defined by the polynomial parity - check matrix @xmath284 its decoding performance is also shown in figure [ fig : sims ] under the label `` @xmath285 time - invariant conv . code with @xmath283 . '' we conclude this example with a few remarks . * figure [ fig : sims ] shows that the convolutional code exhibits a `` convolutional gain '' of between @xmath286 and @xmath287 compared to the @xmath288 $ ] quasi - cyclic ldpc block code at moderate bers and that the gain remains between @xmath289 and @xmath290 at lower bers . * note that the polynomial parity - check matrix @xmath291 that is obtained by the tanner unwrapping technique is independent of the parameter @xmath8 of the polynomial parity - check matrix @xmath63 , as long as @xmath8 is strictly larger than the largest exponent appearing in @xmath63 . moreover , for @xmath292 , the tanner graph of @xmath63 is closely related to the tanner graph of @xmath291 , and so it is not surprising to see that , for larger @xmath8 , the decoding performance of quasi - cyclic ldpc block codes based on @xmath63 tends to the decoding performance of the ldpc convolutional based on @xmath291 , as illustrated by the two curves labeled `` @xmath293 $ ] qc code '' and `` @xmath294 $ ] qc code '' in figure [ fig : sims ] . * the permutation matrices ( more precisely , the circulant matrices ) that were used for constructing the quasi - cyclic codes in this example were _ not _ chosen to optimize the hamming distance or the pseudo - weight properties of the code . in particular , a different choice of circulant matrices may result in better high - snr performance , i.e. , in the so - called `` error floor '' region of the ber curve . for choices of codes with better hamming distance properties , we refer the reader to @xcite . * the remaining curves in figure [ fig : sims ] will be discussed in example [ ex : iterated : gcc : ldpc : code : construction:1 ] . we conclude this subsection with some comments on the syndrome former memory @xmath31 of the convolutional codes obtained by the tanner unwrapping technique , in particular how this syndrome former memory @xmath31 can sometimes be reduced without changing the convolutional code . assume that we have obtained a polynomial parity - check matrix @xmath291 from @xmath63 according to the tanner method . clearly , the syndrome former memory @xmath31 is given by the largest exponent that appears in @xmath291 . in some instances there is a simple way of reducing @xmath31 without changing the convolutional code . namely , if @xmath295 is the _ minimal _ exponent that appears in the polynomials of a given row of @xmath291 , then the polynomials in this row of @xmath291 can be divided by @xmath296 . we illustrate this syndrome former memory reduction for the small convolutional code that appeared in example [ ex : tanner : unwrapping:1:rev:1 ] . [ ex : syndrome : former : memory : reduction:1 ] applying the tanner unwrapping technique to the polynomial parity - check matrix @xmath63 of the quasi - cyclic ldpc code with @xmath297 in remark [ rem : graph : cover : construction:1:variation:1 ] , we obtain @xmath291 of a rate-@xmath59 time - invariant ldpc convolutional code , as shown in example [ ex : tanner : unwrapping:1:rev:1 ] , with syndrome former memory @xmath298 . following the procedure discussed in the paragraph above , the first and second rows of @xmath291 can be divided by @xmath299 and @xmath300 , respectively , to yield an equivalent convolutional code with syndrome former memory @xmath301 and polynomial parity - check matrix @xmath302 figure [ fig : ex : syndrome : former : memory : reduction:1 ] shows parts of the corresponding scalar parity - check matrix @xmath24 for @xmath301 , together with the original scalar parity - check matrix for @xmath298 , and illustrates the equivalence of the two matrices in the sense that only the ordering of the rows is different , which does not affect the corresponding convolutional code . in this example , the order of the even - numbered rows stays the same , while the odd - numbered rows are shifted by four positions . the equivalence of the two parity - check matrices can be seen by noting that the parity - check matrix , outside of the diagonal structure , is filled with zeros . as was seen in example [ ex : graph : cover : construction:3 ] , interesting graph covers can be obtained by combining * gcc1 * with * gcc2 * , or vice - versa . inspired by that example , this subsection considers iterated graph - cover constructions for constructing tanner graphs of ldpc convolutional codes , in particular of time - varying ldpc convolutional codes . [ def : iterated : gcc : ldpc : code : construction:1 ] based on a combination of * gcc1 * , * gcc2 * , and the code - shortening concept introduced in section [ sec : unwrapping:1:rev ] , we propose the following construction of ldpc convolutional codes . 1 . we start with a proto - matrix @xmath120 of size @xmath121 . [ item : iterated : gcc : first : lifting:1 ] we apply * gcc1 * to @xmath120 with finite - size permutation matrices and obtain the matrix @xmath303 . [ item : iterated : gcc : second : lifting:1 ] we apply * gcc2 * to @xmath303 with permutation matrices that are bi - infinite toeplitz matrices and obtain the matrix @xmath304 . [ item : iterated : gcc : tanner : unwrapping:1 ] finally , looking at @xmath304 as the parity - check matrix of a bi - infinite convolutional code , we obtain the parity - check matrix of a convolutional code by shortening the code bit positions corresponding to negative time indices . here , steps [ item : iterated : gcc : second : lifting:1 ] and [ item : iterated : gcc : tanner : unwrapping:1 ] can be seen as an application of the jfz unwrapping method . and ( b ) @xmath301.,scaledwidth=50.0% ] the following example shows how this construction can be applied to obtain ldpc convolutional codes with excellent performance . ( in the example , where suitable , we will refer to the analogous matrices of example [ ex : graph : cover : construction:3 ] and figure [ fig : graph : cover : construction:3 ] that were used to illustrate the iterated graph - cover construction . ) [ ex : iterated : gcc : ldpc : code : construction:1 ] based on definition [ def : iterated : gcc : ldpc : code : construction:1 ] , we construct an ldpc convolutional code by performing the following steps . 1 . we start with the same regular proto - matrix @xmath120 as in example [ ex : tanner : qc : code:1 ] , for which @xmath269 and @xmath270 . we apply * gcc1 * to @xmath120 with permutation matrices that are circulant matrices of size @xmath138 and obtain the parity - check matrix @xmath305 shown in , which is the analogue of @xmath228 in figure [ fig : graph : cover : construction:3](a ) . we apply * gcc2 * to @xmath305 with permutation matrices that are bi - infinite toeplitz matrices and obtain a new parity - check matrix @xmath304 . this is analogous to the transition of the matrix @xmath228 in figure [ fig : graph : cover : construction:3](a ) to the matrix @xmath232 in figure [ fig : graph : cover : construction:3](c ) . the `` diagonal cut '' is obtained by alternately moving @xmath270 units to the right and then @xmath269 units down . 4 . finally , we obtain the desired convolutional code by shortening the code bit positions corresponding to negative time indices . for the choices @xmath276 , @xmath306 , @xmath307 , this construction results in rate-@xmath282 time - varying convolutional codes with syndrome former memory @xmath308 , @xmath309 , @xmath310 , respectively , and with constraint length @xmath311 , @xmath280 , @xmath281 , respectively . the label `` time - varying '' is indeed justified because the convolutional codes constructed here can be expressed in the form of the parity - check matrix in with a suitable choice of syndrome former memory @xmath31 , non - trivial period @xmath37 , and submatrices @xmath312 . the decoding performance of these codes is shown in figure [ fig : sims ] , labeled `` r = 2/5 time - varying conv . code with @xmath313 '' . as originally noted in @xcite , we observe that these three ldpc convolutional codes achieve significantly better performance at a ber of @xmath314 than the other codes shown in this plot , namely with `` convolutional gains '' of @xmath315 for the @xmath316 convolutional code , @xmath317 for the @xmath318 convolutional code , and @xmath319 for the @xmath320 convolutional code , compared to the three respective underlying ldpc block codes . in order to compare these codes based on a given decoding processor ( hardware ) complexity , we consider a block code of length @xmath321 ( see @xcite and @xcite ) . the above time - varying convolutional code for @xmath276 has constraint length @xmath322 , and hence approximately the same processor complexity as the quasi - cyclic block code of length @xmath323 in figure [ fig : sims ] and the time - invariant convolutional code with @xmath283 in figure [ fig : sims ] , but it achieves large gains compared to both of these codes . we note , in addition , that the performance of the time - varying convolutional code with constraint length @xmath320 is quite remarkable , since , at a ber of @xmath324 , it performs within @xmath325 of the iterative decoding threshold of @xmath326 , while having the same processor complexity as a block code of length only @xmath327 . in section [ sec : cost ] , we discuss some possible reasons for these `` convolutional gains , '' along with their associated implementation costs in terms of decoder memory and decoding delay . we make the following observations with respect to the above definition and example . * the ldpc code construction in the above example yields time - varying ldpc convolutional codes with syndrome former memory @xmath328 and period @xmath329 . most importantly , varying @xmath8 in the above construction leads to different ldpc convolutional codes . this is in contrast to the tanner unwrapping technique discussed in section [ sec : varying : circulant : size:1 ] , where the obtained ldpc convolutional code is independent of the parameter @xmath8 , as long as @xmath8 is strictly larger than the largest exponent in @xmath63 . * as mentioned previously in example [ ex : graph : cover : construction:3 ] , the iterated graph - cover construction based on the combination of * gcc1 * and * gcc2 * yields tanner graphs that have a `` pseudo - random '' structure , a structure that seems to be beneficial as indicated by the above simulation results . ( we remark that the improved performance of the time - varying ldpc convolutional codes obtained by unwrapping a randomly constructed ldpc block code was first noted by lentmaier _ _ in @xcite . ) * instead of constructing a first parity - check matrix as in step [ item : iterated : gcc : first : lifting:1 ] of definition [ def : iterated : gcc : ldpc : code : construction:1 ] , one can also start with any other ( randomly or non - randomly constructed , regular or irregular ) parity - check matrix , and still achieve a `` convolutional gain . '' the next example is an illustration of this point . [ example : divsalar : codes : derivatives:1 ] as was done in @xcite , one can replace the parity - check matrix that was constructed in step [ item : iterated : gcc : first : lifting:1 ] of definition [ def : iterated : gcc : ldpc : code : construction:1 ] by an irregular ldpc block code with optimized iterative decoding thresholds . in particular , one can start with the parity - check matrix of the rate-@xmath76 irregular proto - graph - based code from @xcite with an iterative decoding threshold of @xmath330 , and several of its punctured versions . figure [ fig : jplsims ] shows simulation results for the obtained block and convolutional codes . each simulated block code had a block length of about @xmath331 , with code rates ranging from @xmath76 to @xmath332 . we see that `` convolutional gains '' ranging from @xmath333 to @xmath334 at a ber of @xmath324 were obtained . similarly , it was shown in @xcite that an ldpc convolutional code derived from a randomly constructed rate-@xmath76 irregular ldpc block code with block length @xmath335 outperformed the underlying code by almost @xmath336 at a ber of @xmath324 . the degree distribution of the underlying ldpc block code was fully optimized and had an iterative decoding threshold of @xmath337 @xcite . of course , there are other ways of applying the `` diagonal cut '' in step [ item : iterated : gcc : second : lifting:1 ] of example [ ex : iterated : gcc : ldpc : code : construction:1 ] , and so it is natural to investigate the influence of different `` diagonal cuts '' on the decoding performance . we will do this in the next few paragraphs by extending the discussion that was presented right after example [ example : unwrap:1 ] . we start by assuming that the matrix after step [ item : iterated : gcc : first : lifting:1 ] of definition [ def : iterated : gcc : ldpc : code : construction:1 ] has size @xmath338 , and define @xmath339 . then , for any positive integer @xmath52 that divides @xmath340 , we can perform a `` diagonal cut '' where we alternately move @xmath341 units to the right and then @xmath342 units down ( i.e. , @xmath343 . with this , the obtained convolutional code is a periodically time - varying ldpc convolutional code with rate @xmath92 , syndrome former memory @xmath344 , period @xmath345 , and constraint length @xmath346 . ( note that the syndrome former memory @xmath347 depends on @xmath52 , but the constraint length @xmath348 is independent of @xmath52 . ) -regular ldpc block code using different step sizes . ] [ ex : diagonal : cuts : big : ldpc : block : codes:1 ] here we simulate the performance of some ldpc convolutional codes obtained according to the above generalization of the `` diagonal cut . '' namely , we start with a randomly - constructed @xmath220-regular ldpc block code based on a parity - check matrix of size @xmath349 . therefore @xmath350 , @xmath351 , and @xmath352 . ( note that @xmath353 and @xmath354 in this case . ) figure [ fig : results400 ] shows the performance of the resulting family of ldpc convolutional codes , where @xmath52 varies in powers of @xmath263 from @xmath17 to @xmath355 , each with constraint length @xmath356 . we make the following observations . first , the case @xmath357 is not interesting because it results in @xmath358 , i.e. , it is a trivial concatenation of copies of the block code , and so the ber is the same as for the underlying block code . secondly , for all other choices of @xmath52 , the constructed codes perform very similarly , each exhibiting a sizable `` convolutional gain '' compared to the block code , although the syndrome former memory @xmath347 is different in each case . a special case of the above code construction deserves mention . when @xmath359 , i.e. , @xmath360 and @xmath11 are relatively prime , the only possible step size is obtained by choosing @xmath361 , which results in the above - mentioned uninteresting case of trivial concatenations of copies of the block code . however , all - zero columns can be inserted in the parity - check matrix such that a value of @xmath362 is obtained , which allows a step size to be chosen that results in a convolutional code with @xmath363 . the variable nodes corresponding to the all - zero columns are not transmitted , i.e. , they are punctured , so that the rate corresponds to the size of the original parity - check matrix . for the `` diagonal cut '' ldpc convolutional code constructions discussed above , the unwrapped convolutional codes have the minimum possible constraint length @xmath348 , which is equal to the block length of the underlying block code . although this is a desirable property for practical implementation , we do not need to limit ourselves to diagonal cuts in general . inspired by the graph - cover construction of figures [ fig : graph : cover : constructions:2](b ) and [ fig : graph : cover : constructions:2](d ) in example [ ex : graph : cover : construction:2 ] , instead of a `` diagonal cut '' we now consider a `` random cut , '' which we define as a partition of the parity - check matrix into two matrices that add up ( over @xmath1 ) to the parity - check matrix . despite the randomness of this approach , several of the key unwrapping properties of the `` diagonal cut '' are preserved . for example , the computational complexity per decoded bit does not change , since the degree distributions of the resulting codes are all equal . however , the ldpc convolutional codes based on a `` random cut '' typically require larger decoding processor sizes as a result of increased code constraint lengths . -regular ldpc block code using random partitions . ] [ ex : random : cuts : big : ldpc : block : codes:1 ] we continue example [ ex : diagonal : cuts : big : ldpc : block : codes:1 ] ; however , instead of performing `` diagonal cuts , '' we perform `` random cuts . '' figure [ fig : partition ] shows the performance of five such ldpc convolutional codes , each with rate @xmath76 and constraint length @xmath364 , compared to the underlying block code and the ldpc convolutional code constructed in example [ ex : diagonal : cuts : big : ldpc : block : codes:1 ] ( with parameters @xmath365 , @xmath366 , @xmath367 , and @xmath356 ) . we note that the increase in constraint length from @xmath356 to @xmath364 due to the `` random cut '' results in a small additional coding gain in exchange for the larger decoding processor size . finally , we note that , for a size @xmath368 sparse parity - check matrix @xmath369 with @xmath370 nonzero entries , there are a total of @xmath371 possible ways of choosing a random cut . however , due to the sparsity , there are only @xmath372 distinct random cuts , where @xmath373 . in this section we briefly discuss some other graph - cover - based ldpc code constructions proposed in the literature , namely by ivkovic _ et al . _ @xcite , by divsalar _ et al . _ @xcite , by lentmaier _ _ et al.__@xcite , and by kudekar _ et al . _ @xcite . the ldpc code construction by ivkovic _ _ et al.__in @xcite can be seen as an application of the graph - cover construction in figures [ fig : graph : cover : constructions:2](b ) and [ fig : graph : cover : constructions:2](d ) in example [ ex : graph : cover : construction:2 ] . namely , in terms of our notation , ivkovic _ et al . _ @xcite start with a parity - check matrix @xmath239 , choose the set @xmath212 , a collection of zero - one matrices @xmath374 such that @xmath375 , and the collection of permutation matrices @xmath376 , \bigl [ \begin{smallmatrix } 0 & 1 \\ 1 & 0 \end{smallmatrix } \bigr ] \bigr\}$ ] . most importantly , the decomposition of @xmath239 into @xmath377 and @xmath378 is done such that trapping sets that were present in the tanner graph of @xmath239 are not present in the tanner graph of the new parity - check matrix . in addition , ivkovic _ et al . _ give guarantees on the relationship between the minimum hamming distances of the old and new code . one of the ldpc code constructions by divsalar _ _ et al.__in @xcite is the so - called rate-@xmath76 ar4ja ldpc code construction , which was also considered earlier in example [ example : divsalar : codes : derivatives:1 ] . a particularly attractive , from an implementation perspective , version of this code construction is obtained by an iterated graph - cover construction procedure , where each graph - cover construction is based on a cyclic cover , as in the application of * gcc1 * in example [ ex : graph : cover : construction:1 ] . although cyclic covers result in simplified encoding and decoding circuitry , codes based on cyclic covers are known to have the disadvantage that the minimum hamming distance is upper bounded by a number that is a function of the proto - graph structure @xcite . however , because the cyclic cover of a cyclic cover of the proto - graph is _ not necessarily _ a cyclic cover of the proto - graph , such disadvantages are avoided to a certain extent in the ar4ja ldpc code construction . nevertheless , ultimately the minimum hamming distance of such codes will also be upper bounded by some number ; however , these bounds usually become relevant only beyond the code length of interest . the ldpc code constructions by lentmaier _ et al . _ @xcite and kudekar _ et al . _ @xcite can also be seen as iterated graph - cover constructions . we now describe a specific instance of this construction . * it starts with a proto - matrix @xmath379 $ ] . * the first graph - cover construction is very similar to the bi - infinite graph - cover construction in example [ ex : graph : cover : construction:1:infinite:1 ] and figure [ fig : graph : cover : constructions:1:variation:2 ] . namely , in terms of our notation , we define the set @xmath380 , the collection of matrices @xmath135 with @xmath381 $ ] and @xmath382 $ ] , and the collection of permutation matrices @xmath136 with @xmath383 , @xmath384 , @xmath385 , @xmath386 , @xmath387 , @xmath388 , where as before @xmath201 is a bi - infinite toeplitz matrix with zeros everywhere except for ones in the @xmath177-th diagonal below the main diagonal . * the second graph - cover construction is a random graph - cover construction of cover - degree @xmath117 . * the code is shortened . namely , for some positive integer @xmath389 all codeword indices corresponding to values outside the range @xmath390 $ ] are shortened.$ ] , we have opted to present the code construction such that the shortening is done after the two graph - cover construction steps . in this way , the structure of the code construction description matches better the description in definition [ def : iterated : gcc : ldpc : code : construction:1 ] . ] we now point out some differences between this code construction and the ldpc convolutional code construction in definition [ def : iterated : gcc : ldpc : code : construction:1 ] . namely , the ldpc code ensemble constructed above has the following properties . * the first graph - cover construction is based on bi - infinite toeplitz permutation matrices , and the second graph - cover construction is based on finite - size permutation matrices . * the analysis focuses on the case where @xmath117 and @xmath389 go to infinity ( in that order ) , i.e. , for a fixed @xmath389 the parameter @xmath117 tends to infinity . afterwards , @xmath389 tends to infinity . * the number of check nodes with degree smaller than @xmath222 in the tanner graph is proportional to @xmath117 . * in @xcite , for the binary erasure channel , when @xmath117 and @xmath389 go to infinity ( in that order ) , kudekar _ et al . _ prove that the sum - product algorithm decoding threshold for a slight variation of the above - mentioned ensemble of codes equals the maximum a - posteriori decoding threshold for the ensemble of @xmath220-regular ldpc codes . this is a very remarkable property ! ( in @xcite , using density evolution methods , lentmaier _ et al . _ give numerical evidence that this statement might also hold for binary - input output - symmetric channels beyond the binary erasure channel . ) on the other hand , the codes constructed in definition [ def : iterated : gcc : ldpc : code : construction:1 ] have the following properties . ( we assume that the underlying block code is a @xmath220-regular ldpc code . ) * the first graph - cover construction is based on finite - size permutation matrices , and the second graph - cover construction is based on bi - infinite toeplitz permutation matrices . * in a typical application of this construction , @xmath8 is fixed . * the number of check nodes with degree smaller than @xmath222 in the tanner graph of the ldpc convolutional code is proportional to @xmath8 . * for a binary - input output - symmetric channel , the performance of the unterminated ldpc convolutional code under the continuous sliding window sum - product algorithm decoding discussed in section [ sec : implement ] improves with increasing @xmath8 ( see , e.g. , fig . [ fig : sims ] ) , but the ultimate asymptotic threshold of such unterminated decoding is unknown . the differences between these two code families come mainly from the fact that the codes constructed by lentmaier _ et al . _ and kudekar _ et al . _ are essentially block codes , although sophisticated ones , whereas the codes in definition [ def : iterated : gcc : ldpc : code : construction:1 ] are convolutional codes , along with their advantages and disadvantages . in particular , the way the limits of the parameters are taken , there is a significant difference in the fraction of check nodes with degree strictly smaller than @xmath222 . namely , in the case of the codes by lentmaier _ et al . _ and kudekar _ et al . _ this fraction is a fixed non - zero function of @xmath389 ( here we assume fixed @xmath389 and @xmath391 ) , whereas in the case of the codes considered in this paper , this fraction is zero ( here we assume fixed @xmath8 and an unterminated convolutional code ) . we conclude this section with the following remarks . namely , although the convolutional codes in definition [ def : iterated : gcc : ldpc : code : construction:1 ] may not enjoy the same asymptotic thresholds as the block code constructions by lentmaier _ et al . _ and by kudekar _ et al . _ , they lend themselves to a continuous decoding architecture , as described in section [ sec : implement ] , which can be advantageous in certain applications , such as data streaming , without a predetermined frame structure . more importantly , however , it is very encouraging that the simulation results reported in this paper indicate that sizable `` convolutional gains '' are already visible for very reasonable constraint / code lengths . in the next section we discuss some possible reasons for these gains . finally , it is worth noting that , as the block lengths and associated constraint lengths of the constructions presented in this section become larger , the observed `` convolutional gains '' will become smaller since the block code results will approach their respective thresholds . this section collects some analytical results about ldpc convolutional codes . in particular , we compare the existence / non - existence of cycles in ldpc block and ldpc convolutional codes , we present some properties of pseudo - codewords , and we discuss the mostly moderate cost increase in decoder complexity that is incurred by going from ldpc block to ldpc convolutional codes . it is well known that cycles in the tanner graph representation of a sparse code affect message - passing iterative decoding algorithms , with short cycles generally pushing the performance further away from optimum . ( indeed , attempts to investigate and minimize these effects have been made in @xcite and @xcite , where the authors propose ldpc code construction procedures to maximize the connectivity of short cycles to the rest of the graph , thus also maximizing the independence of the messages flowing through a cycle . ) hence it is common practice to design codes that do not contain short cycles , so as to obtain independent messages in at least the initial iterations of the decoding process . avoiding cycles in tanner graphs also has the benefit of avoiding pseudo - codewords . to see this , let the active part of a pseudo - codeword be defined as the set of bit nodes corresponding to the support of the pseudo - codeword , along with the adjacent edges and check nodes . with this , it holds that the active part of any pseudo - codeword contains at least one cycle and/or at least one bit node of degree one . and so , given that the typical tanner graph under consideration in this paper does not contain bit nodes of degree one , the active part of a pseudo - codeword must contain at least one cycle . therefore , avoiding cycles implicitly means avoiding pseudo - codewords . let @xmath392 and @xmath239 be two parity - check matrices such that @xmath393 is a graph cover of @xmath246 . it is a well - known result that any cycle in @xmath393 can be mapped into a cycle in @xmath246 . this has several consequences . in particular , the girth of @xmath393 is at least as large as the girth of @xmath246 , and more generally , @xmath393 contains fewer short cycles than @xmath246 . for the codes constructed in this paper , this means that the unwrapping process ( from block code to convolutional code ) can `` break '' some cycles in the tanner graph of the block code . we now revisit some codes that where discussed in earlier sections and analyze their graph cycle structure using a brute - force search algorithm . defined in ( * ? ? ? * eq . ( 3.1 ) ) . note that this search technique works only for counting cycles of length smaller than twice the girth of the graph . for searching longer cycles , more sophisticated algorithms are needed . ] note that , in order to accurately compare the graph cycle distributions of two codes with different block / constraint lengths , we compute the total number of cycles of a given cycle length per block / constraint length , and divide this number by the block / constraint length . .average ( per bit node ) number @xmath394 of cycles of length @xmath52 for the tanner graphs of the block codes ( bcs ) of block length @xmath11 and convolutional codes ( ccs ) of constraint length @xmath41 discussed in example [ ex : cyc1 ] . ( all tanner graphs have girth @xmath395 . ) [ cols="<,^,^,^,^ " , ] [ ex : cyc3 ] table [ table : girth : average : cycle : lengths : example:2 ] shows the cycle analysis results for the rate-@xmath76 proto - graph - based codes that were discussed in example [ example : divsalar : codes : derivatives:1 ] and whose ber performance was plotted in figure [ fig : jplsims ] . from examples [ ex : cyc1 ] and [ ex : cyc3 ] , we see that many of the short cycles in the tanner graphs of the ldpc block codes are `` broken '' to yield cycles of larger length in the tanner graphs of the derived ldpc convolutional codes . this section collects some comments concerning the pseudo - codewords of the parity - check matrices under consideration in this paper . we start by observing that many of the statements that were made in @xcite about pseudo - codewords can be extended to the setup of this paper . in particular , if some parity - check matrices @xmath392 and @xmath239 are such that @xmath393 is a graph cover of @xmath246 , then a pseudo - codeword of @xmath392 can be `` wrapped '' to obtain a pseudo - codeword of @xmath239 , as is formalized in the next lemma . let the parity - check matrices @xmath392 and @xmath239 be such that @xmath393 is an @xmath117-fold graph cover of @xmath246 . more precisely , let @xmath396 for some set @xmath127 , for some collection of parity - check matrices @xmath254 such that @xmath397 ( in @xmath1 ) , and for some collection of @xmath398 permutation matrices @xmath266 . moreover , let @xmath399 be the set of column indices of @xmath239 and let @xmath400 with @xmath401 be the set of column indices of @xmath392 . with this , if @xmath402 is a pseudo - codeword of @xmath392 , then @xmath403 with @xmath404 is a pseudo - codeword of @xmath239 . ( sketch . ) there are different ways to verify this statement . one approach is to show that , based on the fact that @xmath405 satisfies the inequalities that define the fundamental polytope of @xmath392 @xcite , @xmath406 satisfies the inequalities that define the fundamental polytope of @xmath239 . ( we omit the details . ) another approach is to use the fact that pseudo - codewords with rational entries are given by suitable projections of codewords in graph covers @xcite . so , for every pseudo - codeword @xmath405 of @xmath392 with rational entries , there is some graph cover of @xmath393 with a codeword in it , which , when projected down to @xmath393 , gives @xmath405 . however , that graph cover of @xmath393 is also a graph cover of @xmath246 , and so this codeword , when projected down to @xmath246 , gives @xmath406 as defined in . ( we omit the details ; see @xcite for a similar , but less general , result . ) one can then proceed as in @xcite and show that the awgnc , the bsc , and the bec pseudo - weights @xcite of @xmath405 will be at least as large as the corresponding pseudo - weights of @xmath406 . as a corollary , the minimum awgnc , bsc , and bec pseudo - weights of @xmath392 are , respectively , at least as large as the corresponding minimum pseudo - weights of @xmath239 . similar results can also be obtained for the minimum hamming distance . because the high - snr behavior of linear programming decoding is dominated by the minimum pseudo - weight of the relevant parity - check matrix , the high - snr behavior of linear programming decoding of the code defined by @xmath392 is at least as good as the high - snr behavior of linear programming decoding of the code defined by @xmath239 . in general , because of the observations made in section [ sec : cycleanalysis ] about the `` breaking '' of cycles and the fact that the active part of a pseudo - codeword must contain at least one cycle , it follows that the unwrapping process is beneficial for the pseudo - codeword properties of an unwrapped code , in the sense that many pseudo - codewords that exist in the base code do not map to pseudo - codewords in the unwrapped code . it is an intriguing challenge to better understand this process and its influence on the low - to - medium snr behavior of linear programming and message - passing iterative decoders , in particular , to arrive at a better analytical explanation of the significant gains that are visible in the simulation plots that were shown in section [ sec : variations : unwrapping:1 ] . to this end , the results of @xcite and @xcite with respect to some related code families ( see the discussion in section [ sec : other : ldpc : code : constructions:1 ] ) will be very helpful , since they indicate that some of the features of the fundamental polytope deserve further analysis . in this subsection , we investigate the cost of the convolutional gain by comparing several aspects of decoders for ldpc block and convolutional codes . in particular , we consider the computational complexity , hardware complexity , decoder memory requirements , and decoding delay . more details on the various comparisons described in this section can be found in @xcite . ldpc block code decoders and ldpc convolutional code decoders have the same computational complexity per decoded bit and per iteration since ldpc convolutional codes derived from ldpc block codes have the same node degrees ( row and column weights ) in their tanner graph representations , which determines the number of computations required for message - passing decoding . we adopt the notion of _ processor size _ to characterize the hardware complexity of implementing the decoder . a decoder s processor size is proportional to the maximum number of variable nodes that can participate in a common check equation . this is the block length @xmath11 for a block code , since any two variable nodes in a block can participate in the same check equation . for a convolutional code , this is the constraint length @xmath41 , since no two variable nodes that are more than @xmath41 positions apart can participate in the same check equation . the constraint lengths of the ldpc convolutional codes derived from ldpc block codes of length @xmath11 satisfy @xmath407 . therefore , the convolutional codes have a processor size less than or equal to that of the underlying block code . on the other hand , the fully parallel pipeline decoding architecture penalizes ldpc convolutional codes in terms of decoder memory requirements ( and decoding delay / latency ) as a result of the @xmath57 iterations being multiplexed in space rather than in time . the pipeline decoder architecture of figure [ fig : decoder ] consists of @xmath57 identical processors of size @xmath41 performing @xmath57 decoding iterations simultaneously on independent sections of a decoding window containing @xmath57 constraint lengths of received symbols . this requires @xmath57 times more decoder memory elements than an ldpc block code decoder that employs a single processor of size @xmath408 performing @xmath57 decoding iterations successively on the same block of received symbols . therefore , the decoder memory requirements and the decoding delay of the pipeline decoder are proportional to @xmath409 , whereas the block decoder s memory and delay requirements are only proportional to @xmath11 . another way of comparing the two types of codes , preferred by some researchers , is to equate the block length of a block code to the memory / delay requirements , rather than the processor size , of a convolutional code , i.e. , to set @xmath410 . in this case the block code , now having a block length many times larger than the constraint length of the convolutional code , will typically ( depending on @xmath57 ) outperform the convolutional code , but at a cost of a much larger hardware processor . finally , as noted in section [ sec : ldpc : convolutional : codes:1 ] , the parallel pipeline decoding architecture for ldpc convolutional codes can be replaced by a serial looping decoding architecture , resulting in fewer processors but a reduced throughput along with the same memory and delay requirements . in summary , the convolutional gain achieved by ldpc convolutional codes derived from ldpc block codes comes at the expense of increased decoder memory requirements and decoding delays . although this does not cause problems for some applications that are not delay - sensitive ( e.g. , deep - space communication ) , for other applications that are delay - sensitive ( e.g. , real - time voice / video transmission ) , design specifications may be met by deriving ldpc convolutional codes from shorter ldpc block codes , thus sacrificing some coding gain , but reducing memory and delay requirements , or by employing a reduced window size decoder , as suggested in the recent paper by papaleo _ et al . _ @xcite , with a resulting reduction in the `` convolutional gain . '' in this paper we showed that it is possible to connect two known techniques for deriving ldpc convolutional codes from ldpc block codes , namely the techniques due to tanner and due to jimnez - feltstr " om and zigangirov . this connection was explained with the help of graph covers , which were also used as a tool to present a general approach for constructing interesting classes of ldpc convolutional codes . because it is important to understand how the presented code construction methods can be used and in particular combined we then discussed a variety of ldpc convolutional code constructions , along with their simulated performance results . in the future , it will be worthwhile to extend the presented analytical results , in particular to obtain a better quantitative understanding of the low - to - medium snr behavior of ldpc convolutional codes . in that respect , the insights in the papers by lentmaier _ et al . _ @xcite and kudekar _ et al . _ @xcite on the behavior of related code families will be valuable guidelines for further investigation . the authors would like to thank chris jones , michael lentmaier , david mitchell , michael tanner , and kamil zigangirov for their valuable discussions and comments . we also gratefully acknowledge the constructive comments made by the reviewers . c. berrou , a. glavieux , and p. thitimajshima , `` near shannon limit error correcting coding and decoding : turbo codes , '' in _ proc . ieee international conference on communications _ , geneva , switzerland , may 1993 , pp . 10641070 . s. y. chung , t. j. richardson , and r. l. urbanke , `` analysis of sum - product decoding of low - density parity - check codes using a gaussian approximation , '' _ ieee trans . inf . theory _ 47 , no . 2 , 657670 , feb . 2001 . s. y. chung , g. d. forney , jr . , t. j. richardson , and r. l. urbanke , `` on the design of low - density parity - check codes within 0.0045 db of the shannon limit , '' _ ieee communications letters _ , vol . 5 , no . 2 , pp . 5860 , feb . 2001 . s. bates , d. elliot , and r. swamy , `` termination sequence generation circuits for low - density parity - check convolutional codes , '' _ ieee trans . circuits and systems i _ , vol . 53 , no . 9 , pp . 19091917 , sep . s. bates , z. chen , and x. dong , `` low - density parity check convolutional codes for ethernet networks , '' in _ proc . ieee pacific rim conference on communications , computers and signal processing _ , victoria , bc , canada , aug . 2005 . s. bates , l. gunthorpe , a. e. pusane , z. chen , k. sh . zigangirov , and d. j. costello , jr . , `` decoders for low - density parity - check convolutional codes with large memory , '' in _ proc . 12th nasa symposium on vlsi design _ , coeur dalene , i d , usa , oct . 2005 . r. m. tanner , d. sridhara , a. sridharan , t. e. fuja , and d. j. costello , jr . , `` ldpc block and convolutional codes based on circulant matrices , '' _ ieee trans . inf . theory _ , 50 , no . 12 , pp . 29662984 , dec . 2004 . r. m. tanner , `` on quasi - cyclic repeat - accumulate codes , '' in _ proc . of the 37th allerton conference on communications , control , and computing _ , allerton house , monticello , il , usa , sep . 22 - 24 1999 , pp . 249259 . o. vontobel and r. koetter , `` graph - cover decoding and finite - length analysis of message - passing iterative decoding of ldpc codes , '' _ corr , available online under _ ` http://www.arxiv.org/abs/cs.it/ ` _ _ ` 0512078 ` _ _ , dec . a. e. pusane , k. sh . zigangirov , and d. j. costello , jr . , `` construction of irregular ldpc codes with fast encoding property , '' in _ proc . ieee intl . conference on commun . _ , istanbul , turkey , jun . 1115 , 2006 . m. papaleo , a. r. iyengar , p. h. siegel , j. wolf , and g. corazza , `` windowed erasure decoding of ldpc convolutional codes , '' in _ proc . ieee inform . theory workshop _ , cairo , egypt , jan . 68 2010 , pp . 7882 . s. bates , z. chen , l. gunthorpe , a. e. pusane , k. sh . zigangirov , and d. j. costello , jr . , `` a low - cost serial decoder architecture for low - density parity - check convolutional codes , '' _ ieee trans . circuits and systems i _ , vol . 55 , no . 7 , pp . 19671976 , aug . a. e. pusane , a. jimnez - feltstrm , a. sridharan , m. lentmaier , k. sh . zigangirov , and d. j. costello , jr . , `` implementation aspects of ldpc convolutional codes , '' _ ieee trans . commun . _ , vol . 56 , no . 7 , pp . 10601069 , jul . y. levy and d. j. costello , jr . , `` an algebraic approach to constructing convolutional codes from quasi - cyclic codes , '' in _ coding and quantization _ ( piscataway , nj , 1992 ) , vol . 14 of dimacs ser . discrete math . sci . , pp . 189198 , providence , ri : amer . soc . , 1993 . r. smarandache , a. e. pusane , p. o. vontobel , and d. j. costello , jr . , `` pseudo - codeword performance analysis of ldpc convolutional codes , '' _ ieee trans . inf . theory _ 55 , no . 6 , pp . 25772598 , jun . 2009 . f. hug , i. bocharova , r. johannesson , b. kudryashov , and r. satyukov , `` new low - density parity - check codes with large girth based on hypergraphs , '' in _ proc . ieee intl . symposium on inform . austin , tx , usa , jun . 1318 2010 . a. e. pusane , r. smarandache , p. o. vontobel , and d. j. costello , jr . , `` on deriving good ldpc convolutional codes from qc ldpc block codes , '' in _ proc . ieee intl . symposium on inform . theory _ , nice , france , jun . 2429 , 2007 , pp . 12211225 . d. j. costello , jr . , a. e. pusane , s. bates , and k. sh . zigangirov , `` a comparison between ldpc block and convolutional codes , '' in _ proc . information theory and applications workshop _ , san diego , ca , usa , feb . 610 , 2006 . d. j. costello , jr . , a. e. pusane , c. r. jones , and d. divsalar , `` a comparison of ara- and protograph - based ldpc block and convolutional codes , '' in _ proc . information theory and applications workshop _ , san diego , ca , usa , jan . 29feb . 2 , 2007 . m. lentmaier , d. v. truhachev , and k. sh . zigangirov , `` on the theory of low - density convolutional codes ii , '' _ problems of information transmission ( problemy peredachy informatsii ) _ , vol . 288306 , oct .- dec . d. divsalar , c. r. jones , s. dolinar , and j. thorpe , `` protograph based ldpc codes with minimum distance linearly growing with block size , '' in _ proc . ieee global telecommun . _ , vol . 3 , st louis , mo , usa , nov . 28 dec . 5 2005 . m. ivkovic , s. k. chilappagari , and b. vasic , `` eliminating trapping sets in low - density parity - check codes by using tanner graph covers , '' _ ieee trans . inf . theory _ , 54 , no . 8 , pp . 37633768 , aug . 2008 . m. lentmaier , g. p. fettweis , k. sh . zigangirov , and d. j. costello , jr . , `` approaching capacity with asymptotically regular ldpc codes , '' in _ proc . information theory and applications workshop _ , san diego , ca , usa , feb . 813 2009 . m. lentmaier , d. g. m. mitchell , g. p. fettweis , and d. j. costello , jr . , `` asymptotically regular ldpc codes with linear distance growth and thresholds close to capacity , '' in _ proc . information theory and applications workshop _ , san diego , ca , usa , jan . 31 feb . 5 2010 . r. smarandache and p. o. vontobel , `` quasi - cyclic ldpc codes : influence of proto- and tanner - graph structure on minimum hamming distance upper bounds , '' _ submitted to ieee trans . theory , available online under _ ` http://arxiv.org/abs/0901.4129`_ _ , jan . 2009 . m. lentmaier , a. sridharan , d. j. costello , jr . , and k. s. zigangirov , `` iterative decoding threshold analysis for ldpc convolutional codes , '' _ ieee trans . inf . theory _ 56 , no . 10 , pp . 52745289 , oct . 2010 . g. d. forney , jr . , r. koetter , f. kschischang , and a. reznik , `` on the effective weights of pseudocodewords for codes defined on graphs with cycles , '' in _ codes , systems , and graphical models _ , b. marcus and j. rosenthal , eds.1em plus 0.5em minus 0.4emnew york , usa : springer verlag , 2001 , vol . Abstract:

Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.

Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered . Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video . Paper: in 1969 , garside solved the conjugacy problem in the braid group by investigating the monoid of positive braids @xcite . at the end of the 90 s , dehornoy and paris introduced in @xcite the notion of a garside group , that captures most of the properties used in garside approach . after this seminal paper , the notion has been extended and numerous articles have dealt with garside monoid / group structures ( @xcite,@xcite,@xcite,@xcite,@xcite for instance ) . actually various groups can be equipped with a garside group structure . recently , krammer @xcite , bessis @xcite and digne - michel @xcite have extended the notion of a garside group into the notion of a garside groupoid , which turned out to be crucial in the proof of the long - standing question of the @xmath0 property for complex reflection arrangements @xcite . the standard examples of garside groups are braid groups and their generalization , the so - called artin - tits groups of spherical type . one of the main properties of artin - tits groups is the existence of a family of distinguished subgroups , namely the _ standard parabolic subgroups _ , which are the subgroups generated by a subset of the standard generating set . in order to describe normalizers of such subgroups , we were naturally led in @xcite ( see also @xcite ) to introduce a groupoid called the _ ribbon groupoid_. in an unpublished paper @xcite digne and michel prove that the ribbon groupoid of an artin - tits group of spherical type is a garside groupoid . actually , this result implicit in @xcite , even though the notion of a garside groupoid had not been introduced yet . in @xcite , we extended the notion of a parabolic subgroup into the framework of garside groups . our objective here is to go further and extend the notion of ribbon groupoid . we prove that in the context of garside groups , ribbon groupoids remain a garside groupoids . indeed we prove ( see next sections for definition ) that [ thintror(a)]for every garside group @xmath1 with a @xmath2-structure , the positive ribbon category @xmath3 is a garside category and the ribbon groupoid @xmath4 is the associated garside groupoid . every artin - tits group of spherical type has a @xmath2-structure . then , theorem [ thintror(a ) ] applied in this special case . in order to prove theorem [ thintror(a ) ] , we consider the category @xmath5 of subcategories of a category @xmath6 , whose morphisms are natural transformations . it turns out that for a garside category @xmath6 , the category @xmath5 is not a garside category in general . however , this category shares nice properties with garside monoids ( see section [ section2section ] for precise definition and results ) . we also provide a groupoid presentation of the ribbon groupoid @xmath4 for every garside group @xmath1 with a @xmath2-structure . to obtain this presentation we investigate the quasi - centralizer @xmath7 of @xmath1 , that is the subgroup of @xmath1 made of those elements that permute the atoms of the monoid @xmath8 . in particular we generalize a result of picantin @xcite : [ thintror(a)2 ] for every garside group @xmath1 , the group @xmath7 is a finitely generated free commutative group . furthermore , we describe the normalizer of the standard parabolic subgroups by proving ( see theorem [ theodescnormal ] ) : [ thintroprodsemdir]let @xmath1 be a garside group . let @xmath9 be the groupoid whose objects are the parabolic subgroups @xmath10 of @xmath1 , whose hom - set from @xmath10 to @xmath11 is @xmath12 , and whose composition is the product in @xmath1 . let @xmath13 be the totally disconnected groupoid whose objects are the parabolic subgroups of @xmath1 and whose vertex group at @xmath10 is @xmath10 . then , there exists a standard parabolic subgroupoid @xmath14 of @xmath4 such that @xmath9 is equal to the semi - direct product of groupoids @xmath15 . this theorem generalizes ( * ? ? ? finally , the subgroups of the vertex groups of the ribbon groupoid @xmath4 that are generated by the atoms contained in the vertex group are garside groups . this result is similar to ( * ? ? ? * theorem b ) , which deals with coxeter groups . the reader may wonder what is the interest of proving that ribbon groupoids are garside groupoids . the main point is that it provides a complete description of the connection between standard parabolic subgroups . the notion of a parabolic subgroup is crucial to build important tools like the so - called _ deligne complexes _ of artin - tits groups . therefore to understand their normalizers and their mutually conjugating elements is certainly crucial . furthermore the fact that ribbon groupoids are garside groupoids shows that , even in order to study classical groups such as braid groups , the notion of a garside groupoid is natural and useful . finally , our groupoid presentations of ribbon groupoids of spherical type artin - tits groups provide garside groupoids with _ braid - like _ defining relations . these groupoids are then special among garside groupoids and therefore should provide seminal examples of garside groupoids that are not groups . the paper is organized as follows . in section 2 , we introduce the notions of a garside groupoid and of a parabolic subgroupoid ; we investigate the category @xmath5 . in section 3 , we introduce the positive ribbon category associated with a garside category and prove theorem [ thintror(a ) ] . finally , in section 4 we provide a groupoid presentation of the ribbon groupoid ; along the way we prove theorem [ thintror(a)2 ] . we conclude with the proof of theorem [ thintroprodsemdir ] . here we set the necessary terminology on _ small categories_. in particular we recall the notion of a _ natural transformation _ between two _ functors_. we introduce the central notion of a _ garside groupoid _ and provide examples . the present paper deals with categories , but the reader should not be scared since we only consider _ small categories_. let us introduce the notion of a small category and some basic notions in a naive way . [ definsmcat ] a _ quiver _ @xmath16 is a pair @xmath17 of sets equipped with two maps @xmath18 and @xmath19 such that @xmath20 for every element @xmath21 of @xmath22 . the elements of @xmath22 are called the _ vertices _ and the elements of @xmath23 are called the edges . an edge @xmath24 is said to be _ oriented _ from its _ source _ @xmath25 to its _ target _ @xmath26 . the _ path semigroup @xmath27 associated with the quiver _ @xmath16 is the semigroup with @xmath28 defined by the presentation whose generating set is @xmath29 and whose defining relations are @xmath30 for every @xmath24 in @xmath29 and @xmath31 for every two _ distinct _ elements of @xmath22 . clearly , we can identify the elements of @xmath32 with their images in @xmath27 . note that a product @xmath33 of edges is not equal to @xmath28 in @xmath27 if and only if for every index @xmath34 , one has @xmath35 . if @xmath24 lies in @xmath27 and is not @xmath28 , then one can define its source and its target to be @xmath36 and @xmath37 for any of its decomposition @xmath33 as a product of elements in @xmath29 . the reader may note that the semigroup algebra of @xmath27 is equal to the path algebra of the quiver @xmath16 as defined in @xcite . an element of @xmath27 distinct from @xmath28 is called a _ path _ in the sequel . now , let @xmath16 be a quiver and let @xmath38 be a congruence on @xmath27 such that @xmath28 is alone in its equivalence class @xmath39 and such that two distinct @xmath38-equivalent paths in @xmath27 have the same source and the same target . we denote by @xmath40 the quotient semigroup of @xmath27 by the congruence @xmath38 . by assumption on @xmath38 , to each equivalence classes of paths @xmath41 one can associate a source and a target by setting @xmath42 and @xmath43 , respectively . the ( _ small _ ) _ category @xmath44 associated with the quiver @xmath16 and the congruence @xmath38 _ is the set @xmath45 of non - zero equivalence classes of paths equipped with the source and target maps , and the partial product induced by the product in @xmath40 . in that context , the vertices of @xmath16 are called the objects of the category , and the elements of the category are called the _ morphisms _ of the category . the _ free category _ @xmath46 on @xmath16 is obtained by considering the trivial congruence . in the sequel , we denote by @xmath47 the set of objects of a category @xmath6 . for every @xmath48 in @xmath47 , we denote by @xmath49 the equivalence class of the trivial path @xmath48 . for @xmath48 and @xmath50 in @xmath47 , we denote by @xmath51 the set of morphisms from @xmath48 to @xmath50 . in order to be consistent with @xcite and with the above naive definition of a small category , if @xmath21 lies in @xmath52 and @xmath53 lies in @xmath54 , then we denote by @xmath55 the morphism of @xmath56 obtained by composition . we denote by @xmath57 and by @xmath58 the set of morphisms of the category @xmath6 whose source and target , respectively , are @xmath48 . the seminal example to keep in mind is the case of a category with one object @xmath48 : this is just a monoid whose unity is @xmath49 . here we introduce the notion of a _ natural transformation _ which is crucial in our article . a map @xmath59 from a category @xmath60 to a category @xmath61 is a _ functor _ if , firstly , there exists a map @xmath62 such that @xmath63 for every vertex @xmath48 in @xmath47 and , secondly , one extends @xmath64 to a morphism of semigroups from @xmath40 to @xmath65 by setting @xmath66 . note that the second property is equivalent to say that @xmath67 is included in @xmath68 for every two objects @xmath69 of @xmath6 , and @xmath70 for every two morphisms @xmath53 , @xmath21 of @xmath6 such that @xmath71 . for instance , for every category @xmath44 , there is a surjective functor from the free category @xmath46 to @xmath44 . isomorphism of categories _ is a functor that is bijective . in that case , the inverse is also an isomorphism of categories and the set @xmath67 is equal to @xmath72 . an automorphism of @xmath6 is an isomorphism from @xmath6 to itself . let @xmath60 and @xmath61 be two categories with @xmath73 . let @xmath64 and @xmath74 be two functors from @xmath6 to @xmath75 . then , a _ natural transformation _ @xmath76 from @xmath64 to @xmath74 is a map @xmath77 that sends every vertex @xmath48 in @xmath22 to a morphism @xmath78 from @xmath79 to @xmath80 such that for every two objects @xmath69 in @xmath16 and every morphism @xmath21 in @xmath51 , one has @xmath81 ( see figure [ diagrammetransfnaturelle ] ) . ( 100,70 ) ( 18,0 ) ( 8,0)@xmath82(8,46)@xmath79(78,0)@xmath83 ( 78,46)@xmath80 ( 0,25)@xmath84(38,54)@xmath78(38,6)@xmath85 ( 88,25)@xmath86 for instance , if @xmath6 and @xmath87 are groups and @xmath64 , @xmath74 are two morphisms of groups from @xmath6 to @xmath87 , then a natural transformation from @xmath64 to @xmath74 is an element @xmath88 of the group @xmath87 such that @xmath89 for every @xmath90 in @xmath6 . to introduce the central notion of a garside groupoid , we need first to fix some definitions . the _ atoms _ of a category @xmath44 are the non - identity morphisms whose representing paths are edges only . the _ atom graph _ @xmath91 of the category is the graph that has the same set of vertices than @xmath16 and whose edges are the atoms of the category . we recall that a binary relation ( defined on a set ) is noetherian when every decreasing infinite sequence stabilizes . we say that a morphism @xmath53 of @xmath44 is a factor of the morphism @xmath92 when there exist two morphisms @xmath93 and @xmath94 such that @xmath95 . we say that the category @xmath44 is _ noetherian _ if the set of morphisms is noetherian for factors , in other words , if for every infinite sequence @xmath96 of morphisms such that @xmath97 is a factor of @xmath98 , there exists an index @xmath99 such that @xmath100 for every @xmath101 . in this case , the category is _ atomic _ : each morphism can be written as a finite product of atoms ; furthermore , the category @xmath44 is isomorphic to @xmath102 , where @xmath103 is the congruence on @xmath104 induced by the congruence @xmath38 . this property holds in particular when for every morphism there is a bound on the lengths of its representing paths in the quiver @xmath16 ( where each edge has length @xmath105 ) . if in the category @xmath44 there is no loop for the factor relation , then for every object @xmath48 the left - divisibility and the right - divisibility induce partial orders on the sets @xmath57 and @xmath58 , respectively . this is the case when the category is noetherian . we say that the category @xmath44 is cancellative when for every two objects @xmath48 , @xmath50 and every morphism @xmath21 in @xmath51 the maps @xmath106 and @xmath107 are injective on the sets @xmath108 and @xmath58 , respectively . finally , a _ groupoid _ is a category @xmath6 such that every morphism has an inverse , in other words , such that for every morphism @xmath21 in @xmath51 there exists a morphism @xmath109 in @xmath110 with @xmath111 and @xmath112 . to each category @xmath60 one can associate a groupoid @xmath113 and a functor @xmath114 in the following way . the quiver @xmath115 is obtained by adding to @xmath16 an edge @xmath109 from @xmath116 to @xmath117 for each edge @xmath21 of @xmath16 . the congruence @xmath118 is the congruence generated by @xmath38 and the relations @xmath111 and @xmath112 for each edge @xmath21 from @xmath48 to @xmath50 in @xmath16 . we call the groupoid @xmath119 the _ groupoid of formal inverses _ of @xmath6 . for instance , the _ free groupoid _ on @xmath16 is the groupoid @xmath120 . it should be noted that every functor @xmath121 between two categories induces a functor @xmath122 such that the diagram @xmath123 is commutative . we are now ready to introduce the definition of the special kind of groupoids we consider in this paper . we refer to @xcite for the general theory on lattices . in @xcite , bessis defines the notion of a garside category as follows . a _ categorical garside structure _ is a pair @xmath124 such that : * @xmath6 is a small category equipped with an automorphism @xmath64 such that @xmath76 is a natural transformation from the identity functor @xmath125 to @xmath64 ; * @xmath6 is noetherian and cancellative ; * for every object @xmath48 of @xmath6 , the sets @xmath126 and @xmath58 are lattices for the left - divisibility order and the right - divisibility order , respectively ; * for every two objects @xmath69 of @xmath6 and every atom @xmath21 in @xmath51 , there exists a morphism @xmath127 such that the following diagram is commutative : + ( 100,70 ) ( 8,0 ) ( 8,0)@xmath50(8,46)@xmath48(68,0)@xmath82 ( 68,46)@xmath79 ( 2,25)@xmath21(32,54)@xmath78(32,6)@xmath85 ( 78,25)@xmath84 ( 37,28)@xmath127 in this case , we say that the category @xmath6 is a _ garside category_. + we say that @xmath124 is a _ monoidal garside structure _ when furthermore the category @xmath6 has a unique object . in this case , we say that the monoid @xmath6 is a _ garside monoid_. the reader should note that in the above definition , the automorphism @xmath64 is uniquely defined by @xmath76 . a _ garside groupoid _ @xmath119 is the groupoid of formal inverses of a garside category @xmath6 . when furthermore @xmath6 is a monoid , then we say that @xmath119 is a garside group . if @xmath6 and @xmath87 are two categories and @xmath64 is a functor , then the subset @xmath128 of @xmath6 has a natural structure of category . we say that such a subset is a _ subcategory _ of @xmath6 . in the sequel , we denote by @xmath129 the _ canonical functor _ from the subcategory @xmath130 to the category . the reader should note that , by hypothesis , a garside category @xmath6 verifies the so - called _ ore relations _ and , therefore , the functor @xmath114 is injective . in the sequel we consider @xmath6 as a subcategory of @xmath119 . clearly , the automorphism @xmath64 extends to an automorphism of @xmath119 , still denoted by @xmath64 , and that @xmath76 extends to a natural transformation from the identity functor @xmath131 to @xmath64 . [ exagpat]the seminal case of a garside groupoid @xmath119 occurs when the category has one object @xmath48 . in this case , the category @xmath6 is a garside monoid and @xmath119 is its group of fractions , that is a garside group ( @xcite ) . the element @xmath78 is called the _ garside element _ of the group @xmath119 , or of the monoid @xmath6 . in such a garside group , a natural transformation from the identity morphism to an automorphism corresponds to an element that realizes this automorphism as an inner automorphism . _ braid groups _ and , more generally , _ artin - tits groups of spherical type _ are garside groups which are defined by a group presentation of the type @xmath132 where @xmath133 are positive integers greater than 2 with @xmath134 . in this case , the associated _ coxeter group _ , which obtained by adding the relations @xmath135 for @xmath136 in @xmath137 to the presentation , is finite . if we consider @xmath138 with @xmath139 for @xmath140 and @xmath141 otherwise , we obtain the classical presentation of the braid group @xmath142 on @xmath143 strings . in that case , the associated coxeter group is the permutation group on @xmath143 elements . if @xmath1 is such an artin - tits group , and @xmath144 is its coxeter group , then the canonical surjection @xmath145 has a canonical section ( * ? ? ? * chap . 4 ) . if we denote by @xmath76 the image by that section of the greatest element of @xmath144 , then @xmath76 belongs to the submonoid @xmath8 of @xmath1 generated by @xmath137 , and the associated inner group automorphism induces an automorphism of @xmath8 . it turns out that the pair @xmath146 is a monoidal garside structure with @xmath1 for associated garside group . a group can be a garside group for several monoidal garside structures . for instance , the braid group @xmath142 has the alternative group presentation : @xmath147 where @xmath148 for the generators @xmath149 , and if @xmath150 denotes the submonoid of @xmath142 generated by the @xmath149 , and @xmath151 , then the inner group automorphism of @xmath142 induced by @xmath88 restricts to an automorphism of @xmath150 . again , the pair @xmath152 is a monoidal garside structure with @xmath142 for associated garside group . this alternative garside structure is called the _ dual garside structure _ of the braid group . this point of view was generalized by bessis in @xcite to every artin - tits groups of spherical type . @xcite the free group @xmath153 on two letters @xmath154 has a presentation @xmath155 where @xmath156 and @xmath157 . let @xmath158 . if we denote by @xmath159 the submonoid of @xmath153 generated by the elements @xmath160 , and by @xmath64 the automorphism of @xmath153 that sends @xmath160 onto @xmath161 , then @xmath162 is a monoidal garside structure with group @xmath153 as the associated garside group . the automorphism induced by @xmath76 is @xmath64 .[exef2 ] we end this subsection with a definition and two properties of garside groupoids that we need in the sequel . they are immediate generalizations of well - known properties of artin - tits groups . 2.2 ) [ defisimplelem ] let @xmath124 be a categorical garside structure and denote by @xmath64 the automorphism of @xmath6 induced by @xmath76 . a morphism @xmath21 in @xmath51 is _ simple _ if there exists @xmath163 in @xmath164 such that @xmath165 . note that in the above definition the morphism @xmath163 is also simple . by definition of a garside category , the atoms are simple . [ uniquedecomposprop ] let @xmath124 be a categorical garside structure . + ( i ) @xcite every morphism @xmath21 that belongs to @xmath51 can be decomposed as a product @xmath166 of simple elements . + ( ii ) let @xmath21 lie in @xmath167 . there exist an object @xmath168 , a morphism @xmath169 in @xmath170 and a morphism @xmath171 in @xmath54 such that @xmath169 and @xmath171 are prime to each other in @xmath172 and @xmath21 is equal to @xmath173 . the triple @xmath174 is unique . point @xmath175 of the above proposition does not appear in @xcite , but the proof is similar to the case of garside groups . we call the triple @xmath174 the _ right greedy normal form _ of @xmath21 there is a similar unique _ left greedy normal form _ @xmath176 . [ defcatsbcat]let @xmath6 be a ( small ) category . we define _ the category of subcategories _ @xmath5 of @xmath6 as follows : * the objects are the non - empty subcategories of @xmath6 ; * if @xmath177 and @xmath178 are two subcategories of @xmath6 , then @xmath88 lies in @xmath179 if there exists an isomorphism @xmath180 from @xmath177 to @xmath178 such that @xmath88 is a natural transformation from @xmath181 to @xmath182 . * if @xmath183 and @xmath184 belong to @xmath179 and @xmath185 , respectively , then the composition morphism @xmath186 is defined by @xmath187 , where @xmath188 is the isomorphism associated with @xmath183 . note that in the second item of definition [ defcatsbcat ] the isomorphism @xmath180 is uniquely defined by @xmath88 because @xmath6 is cancellative ; in the third item , @xmath186 is a natural transformation from @xmath181 to @xmath189 , where @xmath190 is such that @xmath184 belongs to @xmath191 . ( 150,70 ) ( 8,0 ) ( 8,0)@xmath50(8,46)@xmath48(68,0)@xmath192 ( 68,46)@xmath193 ( 142,0)@xmath194 ( 142,46)@xmath195 ( 2,25)@xmath21(32,54)@xmath196(32,6)@xmath197 ( 80,25)@xmath198 ( 98,54)@xmath199(98,6)@xmath200 ( 155,25)@xmath201 our objective below is to investigate the properties of @xmath5 and , in particular , to decide whether or not @xmath5 is a garside category . [ lempropcccat]let @xmath124 be a categorical garside structure and denote by @xmath64 the automorphism of @xmath6 induced by @xmath76 . + ( i ) there exist an automorphism @xmath202 of @xmath5 and a natural transformation @xmath203 from the identity functor of @xmath5 to @xmath202 that are induced by @xmath64 and @xmath76 . + ( ii ) the category @xmath5 is cancellative . + ( iii ) for every object @xmath177 of @xmath5 , the left - divisibility and the right - divisibility define partial orders on @xmath204 and @xmath205 , respectively . _ ( i ) _ let @xmath177 , @xmath178 be two objects of @xmath5 and assume @xmath88 lies in @xmath179 ; denote by @xmath206 the isomorphism defined by @xmath88 . then , @xmath207 is an isomorphism from @xmath208 to @xmath209 , and the map @xmath210 is a natural transformation from the canonical embedding @xmath211 to @xmath212 . therefore , we define an isomorphism @xmath202 of @xmath5 by setting @xmath213 and @xmath214 . now , for every object @xmath177 of @xmath5 we denote by @xmath215 the restriction of the map @xmath76 to the subcategory @xmath177 . then , @xmath215 lies in @xmath204 . indeed , the map @xmath215 is a natural transformation from @xmath129 to @xmath216 , where @xmath217 is the restriction of @xmath64 to @xmath177 . clearly , the map @xmath203 is a natural transformation from the identity functor of @xmath5 to @xmath202 . + _ ( ii ) _ the cancellativity of the category @xmath5 follows directly from the cancellativity of the category @xmath6 . + _ ( iii ) _ there is no loop for the factor relation in @xmath5 because there is no loop for the factor relation in @xmath6 . therefore , @xmath204 and @xmath205 are partially ordered sets for the left - divisibility and the right - divisibility , respectively . in the sequel , an object @xmath48 of a category @xmath6 such that @xmath218 is called a trivial object _ of the category . let @xmath124 be a categorical garside structure such that @xmath6 has no trivial object.[proppropribbcat ] the category @xmath5 is noetherian if and only if its object set is finite . assume @xmath6 has a finite number of objects . let @xmath219 be a sequence of morphisms of @xmath5 such that for every @xmath220 , the morphism @xmath221 is a factor of the morphism @xmath222 . we denote by @xmath223 the isomorphism defined by @xmath222 . let @xmath224 and @xmath225 be the sequences of morphisms of @xmath5 such that @xmath226 , and denote by @xmath227 and @xmath228 the isomorphisms associated with @xmath224 and @xmath225 , respectively . then , for every positive integer @xmath220 , every object @xmath48 of @xmath229 and every morphism @xmath21 of @xmath229 , we have @xmath230 and @xmath231 . since @xmath6 is noetherian , for every object @xmath48 of @xmath232 , there exists some integer @xmath233 such that for every @xmath234 , we have @xmath235 . in particular , for every @xmath236 we have @xmath237 , @xmath238 , @xmath239 and @xmath240 . let @xmath241 . from the above discussion , it follows that for every @xmath236 one has @xmath242 , @xmath243 and @xmath244 . + assume finally that @xmath6 has an infinite number of objects ; denote by @xmath245 a sequence of distinct objects of @xmath6 such that @xmath246 is not empty for every @xmath34 . we fix a morphism @xmath247 in @xmath246 for each @xmath34 . let @xmath248 be the subcategory of @xmath6 whose set of objects is @xmath249 such that @xmath248 has trivial objects only . let @xmath250 be the subcategory whose object set is @xmath251 such that @xmath250 has trivial objects only . consider @xmath252 the map from the set of objects of @xmath248 to the morphisms @xmath5 that sends @xmath253 on @xmath254 if @xmath255 and @xmath256 on @xmath257 otherwise . let @xmath258 be the map from the objects of @xmath248 to the morphisms of @xmath5 that sends @xmath259 on @xmath247 and @xmath260 on @xmath261 otherwise . then , @xmath252 clearly belongs to @xmath262 and @xmath258 belongs to @xmath263 . by construction , @xmath264 for every @xmath34 . hense , the category @xmath5 is not noetherian . consider a categorical garside structure @xmath124 and denote by @xmath64 the automorphism of @xmath6 induced by @xmath76 . assume @xmath177 is an object of @xmath6 such that @xmath204 is a lattice for the left - divisibility . assume @xmath88 is an atom of the category @xmath5 that belongs to @xmath179 . then , there exists a morphism @xmath265 in @xmath266 such that the following diagram is commutative : ( 100,70 ) ( 8,0 ) ( 6,0)@xmath178(6,48)@xmath177(70,0)@xmath267(\mathcal{q})$ ] ( 70,48)@xmath267(\mathcal{p})$ ] ( 2,25)@xmath88(30,55)@xmath268(\mathcal{p})$](30,6)@xmath268(\mathcal{q})$ ] ( 82,25)@xmath267(\delta)$ ] ( 40,27)@xmath265 indeed , since @xmath88 is an atom , the greatest common divisor of @xmath88 and @xmath215 is either trivial or equal to @xmath88 . but , @xmath88 is a non - identity morphism of @xmath5 . therefore , there exists an object @xmath48 of @xmath177 such that @xmath269 is not ( the identity morphism ) @xmath48 . this implies that @xmath270 is not trivial and the claim follows . gathering the above results we get : [ thgsfvs2 ] consider a categorical garside structure @xmath271 whose object set is finite . assume that for every object @xmath177 of @xmath5 the sets @xmath204 and @xmath205 are lattices for the left - divisibility and the right - divisibility , respectively . then , the pair @xmath272 is a categorical garside structure . the category @xmath5 is cancellative and noetherian , and for every non empty subcategory @xmath177 of @xmath6 the sets @xmath204 and @xmath205 are lattices for the left - divisibility and the right - divisibility , respectively . furthermore , @xmath203 is a natural transformation from the identity functor of @xmath5 to the automorphism @xmath202 , where @xmath64 is the automorphism of @xmath6 induced by @xmath76 . there is no clear argument to expect that the left / right - divisibilities induce lattice orders in general . however there is one particular case where this property always hold : [ thgsfvs3 ] consider a monoidal garside structure @xmath124 . then , for every non - empty subcategory @xmath177 of @xmath6 the sets @xmath204 and @xmath205 are lattices for the left - divisibility and the right - divisibility . consider a categorical garside structure @xmath273 and a subcategory @xmath177 of @xmath6 . let @xmath183 , @xmath184 belong to @xmath204 . for every object @xmath48 of @xmath177 , we set @xmath274 and @xmath275 ( we recall that @xmath57 is a lattice ) . denote by @xmath188 and @xmath276 the isomorphisms associated with @xmath183 and @xmath184 , respectively . we denote by @xmath277 and @xmath278 the objects of @xmath6 such that @xmath279 and @xmath280 lie in @xmath281 and @xmath282 , respectively . let @xmath50 be another object of @xmath177 , and assume there exists @xmath21 in @xmath283 . write @xmath284 and @xmath285 . we have the sequence of equalities @xmath286 . since @xmath57 is a lattice , there exists a unique morphism @xmath287 in @xmath288 which verifies the equalities @xmath289 and @xmath290 . consider the map @xmath291 that sends an object @xmath48 of @xmath177 to @xmath277 and an edge @xmath21 of @xmath177 to @xmath287 . then , by the cancellativity property , for every two objects @xmath69 of @xmath177 , the restriction of this map to @xmath283 is injective . in particular , when @xmath177 has one object , @xmath291 is an isomorphism from the subcategory @xmath177 to the subcategory @xmath292 . assume that @xmath6 is a monoid , that is a category with one object . set @xmath293 for @xmath294 . clearly , the maps @xmath295 , @xmath296 and @xmath297 are natural transformations from @xmath298 , @xmath299 and @xmath129 to @xmath300 , @xmath301 and @xmath302 , respectively . thus , @xmath303 is a common multiple of @xmath183 and @xmath184 in @xmath5 . now , assume @xmath304 is a common multiple of @xmath183 and @xmath184 in @xmath5 with @xmath305 . let @xmath306 the isomorphism associated with @xmath304 . then , for every object @xmath48 of @xmath177 , there exists @xmath307 in @xmath308 such that @xmath309 and @xmath310 . therefore , the map @xmath311 lies in @xmath312 , and @xmath303 is the least common multiple of @xmath183 and @xmath184 in @xmath204 . similarly , for every morphism @xmath21 in @xmath283 there exists a unique morphism @xmath313 in @xmath314 such that @xmath315 . again , if @xmath6 is a monoid the map @xmath316 is injective , and @xmath317 is the greatest common divisor of @xmath183 and @xmath184 in @xmath204 . thus , the set @xmath204 is a lattice for the left - divisibility . by similar arguments , the set @xmath205 is a lattice for the right - divisibility . as a direct consequence of corollary [ thgsfvs2 ] and proposition [ thgsfvs3 ] , we get let @xmath124 be a monoidal garside structure . then , @xmath272 is a categorical garside structure.[thgsfvs4 ] a subcategory that is a groupoid will be called a _ subgroupoid _ in the sequel . when @xmath124 is a categorical garside structure such that @xmath5 is a garside category , then @xmath318 is a garside groupoid . there is another way to associate a groupoid with @xmath6 . indeed , let @xmath319 be a small groupoid . the _ groupoid of subgroupoids _ of @xmath319 is the full subcategory @xmath320 of the category @xmath321 whose objects are the subgroupoids of @xmath319 . [ defngc ] clearly , the category @xmath320 is a groupoid . then , @xmath322 is a groupoid for every small category @xmath6 . if @xmath323 is a group and @xmath324 is a subgroup , then @xmath325 is the normalizer of @xmath324 in @xmath323 . we recall that we denote by @xmath326 the functor induced by a functor @xmath121 . let @xmath6 be a category . the canonical functor @xmath327 induces a functor @xmath328 . for every object @xmath177 of the category @xmath5 we set @xmath329 . in other words , @xmath330 is the subgroupoid of @xmath119 generated by the subcategory @xmath331 . now , consider @xmath88 in @xmath179 , and denote by @xmath180 its associated isomorphism . let @xmath332 be the map that sends an object @xmath48 of @xmath330 to the morphism @xmath333 . then @xmath332 belongs to @xmath334 . indeed , consider the map @xmath335 which sends an object @xmath48 of @xmath330 to @xmath336 and a morphism @xmath21 in @xmath337 to @xmath338 . then @xmath339 is an isomorphism from @xmath330 to @xmath340 and @xmath332 is a natural transformation from @xmath341 to @xmath342 . then we obtain a map @xmath328 by setting @xmath343 and @xmath344 . clearly , this map is a functor . we remark that @xmath345 is not injective in general : for two distinct subcategories @xmath177 and @xmath178 we can have @xmath346 . for instance , consider the braid monoid @xmath347 which is defined by the monoid presentation @xmath348 ; its group of fractions is the braid group @xmath349 . the sets @xmath350 and @xmath351 generate distinct submonoids of @xmath352 , but both generate the braid group @xmath349 , as a group . moreover , the functor @xmath345 is neither faithful in general : the restriction of @xmath345 to a set @xmath179 is not always injective ; if we consider the monoid @xmath353 defined by the monoid presentation @xmath354 , and we denote by @xmath355 , @xmath356 the submonoids generated by @xmath357 and @xmath358 , respectively , then @xmath359 is a non - trivial morphism in @xmath360 , whereas @xmath361 is trivial in @xmath362 . in the sequel , we write @xmath363 for @xmath318 . [ propfaithfulpropert ] let @xmath124 be a monoidal garside structure . denote by @xmath364 the canonical embedding functor of @xmath6 into @xmath119 . the functor @xmath365 is faithful . let @xmath177 and @xmath178 be two objects of @xmath363 and consider @xmath88 , @xmath304 in @xmath366 such that @xmath367 . then , @xmath368 . then , it is enough to assume for the rest of the proof that @xmath369 and @xmath370 . since the category @xmath5 is a garside category , we can identify @xmath5 with its image in its group of fractions @xmath363 , and decompose the morphism @xmath88 as a product @xmath371 with @xmath183 and @xmath184 in @xmath372 for some object @xmath373 of @xmath5 . since @xmath374 , we have @xmath375 , that is , @xmath376 . by definition , this means that for every object @xmath48 of @xmath177 , we have @xmath377 . but @xmath364 is an injective functor . then @xmath378 and @xmath379 . as a final comment to this section , we remark that the morphism @xmath345 is not injective on the objects . therefore , the groupoid @xmath363 can not be seen as a subgroupoid of @xmath322 . in this section , we introduce and investigate the _ positive ribbon category _ and the _ ribbon groupoid_. this ribbon category is defined as a full subcategory of the category @xmath5 . the ribbon groupoid is defined as a full subgroupoid of @xmath322 , which turns out to be , under some restriction , the group of fractions of the positive ribbon category . we first define the notion of a parabolic subgroupoid . here we extend the notion of a parabolic subgroup of a garside group @xcite into the framework of garside groupoids . if @xmath6 is a category and @xmath88 lies in @xmath57 , then we denote by @xmath380_{\mathcal{c}}$ ] the set of elements between @xmath49 and @xmath88 for the left - divisibility in @xmath57 . [ defparasucat ] let @xmath124 be a categorical garside structure . a subcategory @xmath177 of @xmath6 is a _ parabolic subcategory _ of @xmath6 if for every object @xmath48 of @xmath177 the sets @xmath381 and @xmath382 are sublattices of @xmath57 and @xmath58 , respectively , and , there exists @xmath88 in @xmath383 such that for every object @xmath48 of @xmath177 , one has @xmath384_\mathcal{c } = [ 1_x,\delta(x)]_\mathcal{c}\cap \mathcal{p}_{x\to\cdot } = \delta(x)\wedge\mathcal{p}_{x\to\cdot}\ ] ] in the lattice @xmath57 . with the notation of the above definition , when @xmath177 is a parabolic subcategory then one has @xmath385_\mathcal{c}\cap \mathcal{p}_{x\to\cdot } = [ 1_x,\delta(x)]_{\mathcal{p}}$ ] , and the atoms of @xmath177 are the atoms of @xmath6 that lie in @xmath177 . it is immediate that the pair @xmath386 is a categorical garside structure . furthermore , the canonical embedding functor from @xmath177 to @xmath6 induces an injective functor from @xmath387 to @xmath119 such that the following diagram is commutative : @xmath388 therefore , we can identify @xmath387 with a subgroupoid of @xmath119 . in that context , we have @xmath389 ( where the notion of an intersection of two subcategories is defined in an obvious way ) . let @xmath124 be a categorical garside structure . + a subgroupoid of the garside groupoid @xmath119 is a _ standard parabolic subgroupoid _ when it is the groupoid of formal inverses @xmath387 of a parabolic subcategory @xmath177 of @xmath6 . a non empty subgroupoid @xmath319 of @xmath119 is a _ parabolic subgroupoid _ if there exists a standard parabolic subgroupoid @xmath387 such that @xmath390 is not empty . [ exematdeux ] in the context of garside groups , we recover the notion of a standard parabolic subgroup introduced in @xcite , which extends the notion of a standard parabolic subgroup of an artin - tits group . standard parabolic subgroups of an artin - tits group @xmath1 are the subgroups generated by any set of atoms of the associated artin - tits monoid @xmath8 ( _ cf . _ example [ exagpat ] ) ) . in the sequel , we denote by @xmath391 the standard parabolic subgroup of a garside group @xmath1 generated by a set @xmath392 of atoms of @xmath8 . we only consider parabolic subgroupoids that are standard in the sequel . therefore , we write _ parabolic _ for _ standard parabolic _ in the sequel . [ exef22 ] consider the free group @xmath153 on two letters @xmath154 and the garside structure of example [ exef2 ] . in this context , except the whole group @xmath153 and the trivial subgroup , a parabolic subgroup of @xmath153 is any subgroup generated by one generator @xmath160 . then , parabolic proper subgroups are all isomorphic to @xmath393 . [ exef23 ] direct product of garside groups are garside groups . for instance , the group @xmath1 defined by the group presentation @xmath394 is a garside group , with @xmath395 as garside element . its parabolic subgroups are the four subgroups @xmath396 , @xmath397 , @xmath398 and @xmath1 . [ exef24 ] the group @xmath1 defined by the presentation @xmath399 is a garside group , with @xmath400 as garside element . indeed , amalgam products of garside groups above their garside elements are garside groups . the parabolic subgroups of @xmath1 are the four subgroups @xmath401 , @xmath402 , @xmath403 and @xmath1 . it is quite easy to see that most of the properties proved in @xcite can be extended into the context of garside groupoid , with similar proof . we are now ready to define the ribbon groupoid , whose objects are the parabolic subgroupoids . let @xmath271 be a categorical garside structure . the _ positive ribbon category _ @xmath404 associated with @xmath6 is the full subcategory of @xmath5 whose objects are the parabolic subcategories of @xmath6 . we recall that for every parabolic subcategory @xmath177 of @xmath6 , we have identified @xmath387 with a subgroupoid of @xmath119 . we also recall that @xmath405 and that the categories @xmath177 and @xmath387 have the same objects . in particular every element @xmath88 of @xmath406 belongs to @xmath407 , where @xmath180 is the isomorphism associated with @xmath88 . let @xmath124 be a categorical garside structure . + ( i ) if @xmath387 and @xmath408 are two parabolic subgroupoids , then a ribbon from the former to the latter is a morphism @xmath88 in @xmath406 that belongs to @xmath409 . + ( ii ) the _ ribbon groupoid _ @xmath410 of @xmath119 is the subcategory of @xmath411 whose objects are the standard parabolic subgroupoids of @xmath119 and whose morphisms are the ribbons . consider the free group @xmath153 on two letters @xmath154 , and the garside structure of examples [ exef2 ] and [ exef22 ] . then , each object of the groupoid @xmath412 distinct from the trivial subgroup and the whole group can be identified with one of the @xmath160 . clearly , there are morphisms between @xmath160 and @xmath413 in @xmath412 if and only if @xmath414 is even . the category @xmath410 is clearly a groupoid and the image by @xmath345 of a morphism of @xmath404 is a ribbon . in the sequel such a ribbon is called a _ positive _ ribbon . indeed , let @xmath124 be a categorical garside structure such that the vertex set of @xmath6 is finite . denote by @xmath64 the automorphism of @xmath6 induced by @xmath76 . + ( i ) the category @xmath404 is cancellative and noetherian . + ( ii ) the functor @xmath202 restricts to an automorphism @xmath202 of @xmath404 . the restriction of @xmath203 to the vertex set of @xmath404 is a natural transformation from the identity functor of @xmath404 to this restricted automorphism . + ( iii ) when @xmath6 is a monoid , the functor @xmath328 is injective on to the category @xmath404 and the image @xmath415 is a subcategory of @xmath410 . moreover the morphism @xmath416 induces an isomorphism of groupoids from @xmath417 to @xmath410 . @xmath418 @xmath404 is cancellative and noetherian since it is a subcategory of @xmath5 . + @xmath175 from the equality @xmath419 and the definition of a parabolic subcategory , it follows that @xmath208 is a parabolic subcategory if and only if @xmath177 is a parabolic subcategory . moreover , in this case the map @xmath215 lies in @xmath420 . + @xmath421 by construction , the image of @xmath404 by @xmath345 is a subcategory of @xmath410 . furthermore , we already know that @xmath345 is faithful by proposition [ propfaithfulpropert ] . now , if @xmath422 , @xmath423 are two objects of @xmath404 , then one has @xmath424 hence , @xmath345 lies injective on @xmath404 . using that @xmath5 is a garside category , we get that @xmath416 induces an isomorphism of groupoids from the subgroupoid @xmath417 to its image , which lies in @xmath410 . let @xmath88 lie in @xmath425 and @xmath426 be its associated isomorphism . we can decompose @xmath88 as a product @xmath427 for some non negative integer @xmath220 and some @xmath183 in the monoid @xmath6 . now , the element @xmath183 belongs to @xmath428 since @xmath429 . therefore , the image of @xmath417 by @xmath345 is @xmath410 . as a consequence of the previous result , we get [ trtrtrrt]let @xmath124 be a categorical garside structure such that @xmath6 is a monoid . assume the sets @xmath430 and @xmath431 are sublattices of @xmath204 and @xmath205 , respectively , for every parabolic submonoid @xmath177 of @xmath6 . then @xmath432 is a categorical garside structure with @xmath410 as associated garside groupoid . generalizing the terminology of @xcite to garside groupoids , we could say under the assumption of proposition [ trtrtrrt ] that @xmath404 is a _ garside subcategory _ of @xmath5 . in the previous sections , we prove , under some technical assumptions , that the category of subcategories of a garside @xmath5 category @xmath6 is itself a garside category . in particular this is always the case when @xmath6 is a garside monoid . we prove that , moreover , the positive ribbon category @xmath404 is also a garside category , with the ribbon groupoid @xmath410 as associated garside groupoid , under the assumption that this positive ribbon category @xmath404 respects the lattice structure of the category of subcategories @xmath5 . in this section , we consider a simple criteria which insures that @xmath404 respects the lattice structure of @xmath5 . the criteria is verified by artin - tits groups of spherical type . we recall that a monoidal garside structure @xmath146 is a categorical garside structure such that @xmath8 is a monoid ; we denote by @xmath1 the associated garside group . we denote by @xmath433 a parabolic submonoid of @xmath8 whose atom set is @xmath434 . we denote by @xmath10 the associated standard parabolic subgroup . we recall that , in this context , an element @xmath435 of @xmath436 is an element of @xmath8 such that @xmath437 ( which is equivalent to @xmath438 ) . from now on , for @xmath439 in @xmath440 , we denote by @xmath441 and @xmath442 their lcm and their gcd for the left - divisibility , respectively , and we denote by @xmath443 and @xmath444 their lcm and their gcd for the right - divisibility , respectively . [ defnustructure]let @xmath146 be a monoidal garside structure . let @xmath137 be the atom set of @xmath8 . + ( i ) we say that @xmath445 _ has a @xmath2-function _ if for each parabolic submonoid @xmath433 there exists a map @xmath446 such that 1 . for every @xmath136 in @xmath137 , the morphism @xmath447 is an atom of @xmath3 ; 2 . for every @xmath136 in @xmath137 and every @xmath435 in @xmath448 , if @xmath136 left - divides @xmath435 then @xmath447 left - divides @xmath435 ; 3 . for every @xmath449 in @xmath137 , the lcm of @xmath447 and @xmath450 for left - divisibility lies in @xmath448 . \(ii ) we say that @xmath445 _ has a @xmath451-function _ if for each parabolic submonoid @xmath433 there exists a map @xmath452 such that 1 . for every @xmath136 in @xmath137 , the morphism @xmath453 is an atom of @xmath3 ; 2 . for every @xmath136 in @xmath137 and every @xmath435 in @xmath454 , if @xmath136 right - divides @xmath435 then @xmath453 right - divides @xmath435 ; 3 . for every @xmath449 in @xmath137 , the lcm of @xmath453 and @xmath455 for right - divisibility lies in @xmath454 . \(iii ) we say that @xmath445 has a _ @xmath2-structure _ if it has both a @xmath2-function and a @xmath451-function . \(i ) we do not require that @xmath136 left - divides @xmath447 . + ( ii ) when @xmath1 has a @xmath2-function ( _ resp . _ a @xmath451-function ) , then each atom of @xmath456 that belongs to @xmath457 ( _ resp . _ to @xmath458 ) is equal to some @xmath447 ( _ resp . _ some @xmath453 ) . furthermore , if @xmath435 is an atom of @xmath456 that belongs to @xmath457 ( _ resp . _ to @xmath458 ) and @xmath136 in @xmath137 left - divides ( _ resp . _ right - divides ) @xmath435 , then @xmath459 ( _ resp . _ @xmath460 ) . [ exemplnufunctspheratgp]every artin - tits monoid of spherical type ( _ cf . _ example [ exef23 ] ) has a @xmath2-structure . consider the notation of example [ exef23 ] . let @xmath434 be a subset of @xmath137 and @xmath136 lie in @xmath137 . if @xmath136 does not belong to @xmath434 , we set @xmath461 and @xmath462 ; if @xmath136 lies in @xmath434 , we set @xmath463 where @xmath464 is the indecomposable component of @xmath434 that contains @xmath136 . we recall that an artin - tits group of spherical type is said to be _ indecomposable _ when it is not the direct product of two of its proper standard parabolic subgroups . it follows from @xcite that these functions provide a @xmath2-structure to the artin - tits monoid . [ rtgvfresc ] let @xmath146 be a monoidal garside structure . + ( i ) if @xmath1 has a @xmath2-function , then the set @xmath457 is a sublattice of @xmath465 for every parabolic submonoid @xmath433 . + ( ii ) if @xmath1 has a @xmath451-function then the set @xmath458 is a sublattice of @xmath466 for every parabolic submonoid @xmath433 . ( 150,110 ) ( 10,15 ) ( 4,6)@xmath467(61,6)@xmath468(126,6)@xmath469 ( 4,106)@xmath434(61,106)@xmath470(126,106)@xmath471 ( 48,60)@xmath472 ( 4,60)@xmath435(20,107)@xmath473 ( 80,106)@xmath474(36,81)@xmath475(52,36)@xmath476(94,73)@xmath477(128,60)@xmath478 @xmath418 let @xmath137 be the atom set of @xmath8 . let @xmath479 be a parabolic submonoid of @xmath8 , and consider @xmath439 that lie in @xmath448 . since @xmath3 is a full subcategory of @xmath480 , it is enough to prove that the lcm and the gcd for the left - divisibility in @xmath8 of @xmath435 and @xmath90 belong to @xmath448 . let @xmath136 lie in @xmath137 . + gcd s : by the second defining property of a @xmath2-function , if @xmath136 left - divides both @xmath435 and @xmath90 then @xmath447 left - divides both @xmath435 and @xmath90 . since @xmath447 lies in @xmath3 , by the noetherianity property , it follows that the gcd of @xmath435 and @xmath90 for the left - divisibility lies in @xmath448 . + lcm s : let @xmath435 be in @xmath481 and @xmath90 be in @xmath436 . we have to prove that the lcm @xmath441 of @xmath435 and @xmath90 belongs to @xmath448 . clearly , we only need to consider the case when @xmath459 for some @xmath136 in @xmath137 . furthermore we can assume without restriction that @xmath435 does not left - divide @xmath90 . write @xmath482 . it is enough to prove that there exist @xmath483 in @xmath137 and @xmath484 in @xmath8 such that @xmath485 . indeed , in this case one has @xmath486 , and if @xmath487 we can write @xmath488 ; in particular , @xmath489 . we can repeat the process as long as @xmath490 . by the noetherianity property of @xmath8 the process has to stop . so , consider a decomposition @xmath491 where @xmath492 and @xmath473 belongs to @xmath493 . write @xmath494 and @xmath495 ( see figure [ diagramme ] ) . since @xmath8 has a @xmath2-function and @xmath435 is equal to @xmath447 , there exist @xmath468 and @xmath472 such that @xmath496 , @xmath476 and @xmath477 belong to @xmath497 , @xmath498 and @xmath499 , respectively . by assumption , @xmath496 does not left - divide @xmath474 . in particular @xmath500 , and there exists @xmath501 in @xmath137 such that @xmath502 left - divides @xmath476 ; furthermore , @xmath476 left - divides @xmath503 . therefore , if @xmath504 we are done . otherwise , replacing @xmath435 and @xmath90 by @xmath505 and @xmath477 , respectively , we can find @xmath506 in @xmath137 such that @xmath507 . furthermore , we can write @xmath508 and @xmath509 with @xmath510 , @xmath511 and @xmath512 in @xmath513 , @xmath514 and @xmath515 , respectively , for some subsets @xmath516 , @xmath517 of @xmath137 . again , there exists @xmath518 in @xmath137 such that @xmath519 left - divides @xmath511 , and @xmath511 left - divides @xmath520 . we can repeat the process as long as @xmath521 . but , @xmath522 . by the noetherianity property , there exists @xmath34 such that @xmath523 . in this case , @xmath524 left - divides @xmath478 , and we are done . + @xmath175 the proof is similar to the proof of @xmath418 . ( 190,60 ) ( 10,6 ) ( 50,0)@xmath160(90,0)@xmath161(133,0)@xmath525 ( 50,36)@xmath160(92,36)@xmath161(135,36)@xmath525 ( 25,11)@xmath526(67,11)@xmath527(115,11)@xmath528(158,11)@xmath529 from propositions [ trtrtrrt ] and [ rtgvfresc ] we obtain theorem [ thintror(a ) ] , which applies in the case of artin - tits groups of spherical type . the latter groups are not the only garside groups which have a @xmath2-structure : \(i ) consider the notation of example [ exef2 ] . the category @xmath530 is a garside category with @xmath531 as associated garside groupoid . + ( ii ) the category @xmath3 of the garside group @xmath1 of example [ exef23 ] is a garside category with @xmath4 as associated garside groupoid . + ( iii ) the category @xmath3 of the garside group @xmath1 of example [ exef24 ] is a garside category with @xmath4 as associated garside groupoid . we only need to explicit a @xmath2-structure in each case : + @xmath418 for @xmath532 and @xmath533 , one has @xmath534 ; for @xmath535 and @xmath533 , one has @xmath536 ; for @xmath537 and @xmath533 with @xmath538 , one has @xmath539 , @xmath540 , and @xmath541 . + @xmath175 for @xmath532 or @xmath542 and @xmath543 , one has @xmath544 ; for @xmath545 and @xmath543 , one has @xmath546 ; for @xmath547 , one has @xmath548 , and @xmath549 . + @xmath421 for @xmath532 and @xmath543 , one has @xmath544 ; for @xmath545 and @xmath543 , one has @xmath550 ; for @xmath551 , one has @xmath552 , @xmath553 and @xmath554 ; for @xmath555 , one has @xmath556 , @xmath557 and @xmath558 . given a group , it is a classical question to obtain a presentation of this group . here , we consider the similar problem in the context of groupoids . for all this section we fix a monoidal garside structure ( @xmath559 , such that the garside monoid @xmath8 has a @xmath2-structure . we denote by @xmath137 the atom set of @xmath8 and by @xmath1 its group of fractions . in the previous section , we have seen that the ribbon groupoid @xmath4 is a garside groupoid . let us first precise the notion of a groupoid presentation . we recall that the free category @xmath46 associated with a graph @xmath16 has been defined in section [ definsmcat ] . let @xmath6 be a small category . let @xmath16 be a quiver whose vertex set is the object set of @xmath6 and whose edges are morphisms of @xmath6 . + ( i ) we say that @xmath16 _ generates @xmath6 as a category _ if the canonical map from @xmath16 to @xmath6 extends to a surjective functor from the free category @xmath46 to the category @xmath6 . + ( ii ) if @xmath6 is a groupoid , we say that @xmath16 _ generates @xmath6 as a groupoid _ if the canonical map from @xmath16 to @xmath6 extends to a surjective functor from the free groupoid @xmath120 to the groupoid @xmath6 . let @xmath6 be a small category . consider a quiver @xmath16 and a set @xmath560 of morphisms of @xmath46 with the same source and the same target . denote by @xmath561 is the congruence on @xmath27 generated by @xmath562 . + ( i ) we say that @xmath563 is a _ presentation of @xmath6 as a category _ if @xmath16 generates @xmath6 as a category and the surjective functor from @xmath46 to @xmath6 induces an isomorphism of categories from @xmath564 to @xmath6 . + ( ii ) when @xmath6 is a groupoid , we say that @xmath563 is a _ presentation of @xmath6 as a groupoid _ if @xmath16 generates @xmath6 as a groupoid and the surjective functor from @xmath120 to @xmath6 induces an isomorphism of groupoid from @xmath565 to @xmath6 . [ generquivera]let @xmath568 be the graph whose vertices are the standard parabolic subgroups of @xmath1 , and whose edge set is the image of the @xmath2-functions : to each element @xmath447 that lies in @xmath569 corresponds an edge from @xmath10 to @xmath11 in @xmath568 . the quiver @xmath568 generates @xmath3 as a category and @xmath4 as a groupoid . the atom graph of @xmath3 is a generating quiver and the image of the @xmath2-functions is precisely the atom set of the category @xmath3 ( see section [ sectiongardgrd ] ) . furthermore , @xmath4 is the group of fractions of the garside category @xmath3 . in the case of an artin - tits group of spherical type , we have seen in example [ exemplnufunctspheratgp ] that there is two types of atoms in @xmath4 , namely the @xmath574 and the @xmath575 . we are going to see that this is a general fact ; we need first to study the quasi - centralizer of a garside group . let @xmath576 be a garside monoid with @xmath323 as garside group . the _ quasi - centralizer _ of the monoid @xmath576 is the submonoid @xmath577 defined by @xmath578 the _ quasi - centralizer _ of the group @xmath323 is the subgroup @xmath579 defined by @xmath580 in other words , @xmath577 and @xmath581 are equal to @xmath582 and @xmath583 , respectively . by definition , the garside element @xmath76 belongs to @xmath577 . in this section , we extend the main result of @xcite into every garside group . the proof is in the spirit of the latter reference . however , some definitions and technical arguments of the proof of @xcite can not be simply extended to every garside group . this is because in general the set of divisors of @xmath76 is not finite . in our proof , this argument is replaced by the noetherianity property of @xmath576 . we need some preliminary results . [ defindesdeltag ] let @xmath584 be a monoidal garside structure . + ( i ) for every @xmath435 in @xmath576 the set @xmath585 has a lcm @xmath586 for the left - divisibility . furthermore , @xmath435 left - divides @xmath586 and @xmath587 . + ( ii ) for every @xmath435 in @xmath576 the set @xmath588 has a @xmath589 for the right - divisibility . furthermore , @xmath435 right - divides @xmath589 and @xmath590 . by symmetry , it is enough to prove @xmath418 . from the noetherianity property of @xmath576 it follows that every none - empty subset of @xmath576 that has a common multiple for the left - divisibility has a lcm for the left - divisibility . but @xmath76 is quasi - central and there exists a positive integer @xmath220 such that @xmath435 left - divides @xmath591 . therefore , @xmath591 is a common multiple of @xmath585 , and therefore @xmath586 exists . by definition we have @xmath587 . finally , considering @xmath592 , we obtain that @xmath435 left - divides @xmath586 . [ lemsuitetaun ] let @xmath584 be a monoidal garside structure and @xmath435 lie in @xmath576 . + define @xmath593 by @xmath594 , @xmath595 and @xmath596 . the sequence @xmath593 stabilizes to an element @xmath597 which belongs to @xmath598 . furthermore , for every element @xmath90 in @xmath598 , @xmath435 left - divides @xmath90 if and only if @xmath597 left - divides @xmath90.[defindestaug ] in particular , for every quasi - central element @xmath90 , we have @xmath599 . by the previous lemma , @xmath601 left - divides @xmath602 , and @xmath603 right - divides @xmath601 . furthermore , with the notation of lemma [ defindesdeltag ] s proof , all the @xmath604 divides @xmath591 ( for both the left - divisibility and the right - divisibility since @xmath591 is a quasi - central element ) . by the noetherianity property , there exist @xmath586 in @xmath576 and @xmath605 such that @xmath606 for every @xmath236 . by lemma [ defindesdeltag ] , we get the sequence of inclusions @xmath607 . thus , @xmath597 is a quasi - central element . assume @xmath90 lies in @xmath598 such that @xmath435 left - divides @xmath90 , and write @xmath608 . by assumption , we have @xmath609 . therefore , @xmath90 is a common multiple of the set @xmath610 and @xmath586 left - divides @xmath90 . but @xmath90 is quasi - central , then @xmath586 , that is @xmath611 , also right - divides @xmath90 . inductively we get that @xmath612 left - divides and right - divides @xmath90 for every @xmath220 . finally , by lemma [ defindesdeltag ] , @xmath602 left - divides @xmath601 and @xmath601 right - divides @xmath603 for every @xmath220 ; then we can write @xmath613 for some @xmath614 in @xmath576 . since @xmath597 is a quasi - central , it follows that @xmath435 left - divides @xmath597 . [ remlemsuitetaun]with the notation of lemma [ lemsuitetaun ] and a similar proof of this lemma , we can obtain an element @xmath615 by considering the sequence @xmath616 defined by @xmath617 , @xmath618 and @xmath619 . using that an element of @xmath577 has the same set of left - divisors and of right - divisors , we deduce that @xmath620 for every @xmath435 in @xmath576 . [ centrcommprop]let @xmath584 be a monoidal garside structure , and denote by @xmath137 the atom set of @xmath576 . for every @xmath449 in @xmath137 , either @xmath621 or @xmath622 in @xmath576 . furthermore , in any case , @xmath623 . the main argument of the first part s proof is as in @xcite . since @xmath624 is a quasi - central element , it has the same left - divisors and right - divisors . assume that @xmath136 divides @xmath624 and let us prove that @xmath621 . by lemma [ defindestaug ] , we can write @xmath625 . still by lemma [ defindestaug ] , if @xmath483 divides @xmath626 , then @xmath624 divides @xmath626 and we are done : @xmath621 . assume this is not the case . since @xmath483 is an atom of @xmath576 , the elements @xmath435 and @xmath626 are prime to each other for the right - divisibility in @xmath576 . this implies that @xmath624 is the lcm of @xmath435 and @xmath90 for the left - divisibility . in particular , @xmath627 . then , by definition , @xmath483 left - divides @xmath628 and , therefore , left - divides @xmath629 . in particular , we can write @xmath630 for some @xmath478 in @xmath631 . but @xmath626 and @xmath624 are quasi - central elements , then @xmath90 is also a quasi - central element and @xmath632 . a contradiction : we get @xmath633 with @xmath634 . now , if @xmath635 then there exists @xmath636 in @xmath137 that divides both @xmath626 and @xmath624 . by the above argument , we have @xmath637 . assume finally that @xmath638 . we can write @xmath639 and @xmath640 where @xmath641 lie in @xmath576 . clearly @xmath641 have to be quasi - central elements . as @xmath642 , by the first part of the proof , the decomposition @xmath643 is a left greedy normal form ( _ cf . [ uniquedecomposprop]@xmath175 ) . but we have @xmath644 . since @xmath643 is not in @xmath576 , @xmath624 and @xmath626 do not right - divide @xmath505 and @xmath477 , respectively . this implies that both @xmath645 and @xmath646 are right greedy normal forms . by unicity of this normal form , we get @xmath647 and @xmath648 . thus , @xmath623 . [ theoremcentralisateurgeneralisationpicantin]let @xmath584 be a monoidal garside structure , and denote by @xmath137 the atom set of @xmath576 . + ( i ) the monoid @xmath598 is a free commutative monoid . furthermore there exists a projection @xmath649 such that 1 . the set @xmath650 is a free base of @xmath577 ( where some @xmath626 are possibly equal ) ; 2 . the map @xmath304 respects the left - divisibility and the right - divisibility , in particular if @xmath651 left / right - divides @xmath652 then @xmath626 left / right - divides @xmath435 ; 3 . the map @xmath304 is a semilattice homomorphism for @xmath653 and for @xmath654 ; in particular , @xmath655 for every @xmath439 in @xmath576 . this theorem should be compared with the definition of @xmath2-functions ( _ cf . _ definition [ defnustructure ] ) . note that the map @xmath304 is not a semilattice homomorphism for @xmath656 ( nor @xmath657 ) in general @xcite . @xmath418 we already know by lemma [ defindestaug ] that @xmath658 , that @xmath659 and that @xmath304 respects the left - divisibility and the right - divisibility . furthermore , using the noetherianity property and the same lemma , we get that the set @xmath650 is a generating set for @xmath577 . by proposition [ centrcommprop ] , it follows that the monoid @xmath577 is commutative , and that for distinct elements @xmath626 and @xmath624 , the element @xmath660 is a common multiple of @xmath626 and @xmath624 for both the left - divisibility and the right - divisibility . using lemma [ defindestaug ] , we get that @xmath660 is the lcm of @xmath626 and @xmath624 ( for both the left - divisibility and the right - divisibility ) : otherwise , there would be some @xmath636 in @xmath137 that divides both @xmath626 and @xmath624 and then we should have @xmath637 . therefore , @xmath598 is a free commutative monoid with @xmath650 as a free base . now , let @xmath435 and @xmath90 belong to @xmath576 . they left - divides @xmath441 . therefore @xmath597 , @xmath629 and @xmath661 left - divides @xmath662 . but @xmath597 and @xmath629 have a common multiple in @xmath577 for the left - divisibility ( that is some power of @xmath76 ) . by the noetherianity property , there exists a minimal common multiple @xmath663 of @xmath626 and @xmath624 for the left - divisibility in @xmath598 . assume there exists @xmath636 in @xmath137 that right - divides both @xmath664 and @xmath665 ; then by remark [ remlemsuitetaun ] , @xmath666 also right - divides @xmath664 and @xmath665 , which is impossible by minimality . therefore @xmath661 belongs to @xmath577 . since @xmath441 left - divides @xmath661 , the element @xmath662 left - divides @xmath661 . as a conclusion , @xmath662 is equal to @xmath661 . + @xmath175 let @xmath435 lie in @xmath579 and @xmath667 be its left greedy normal form ( _ cf . _ proposition [ uniquedecomposprop ] ) . we claim that @xmath359 and @xmath357 belong to @xmath577 . this proves that @xmath579 is ( isomorphic to ) the group of fractions of @xmath577 and , therefore , the second point of the proposition . actually , every element @xmath435 of @xmath323 can be written as @xmath668 with @xmath669 and @xmath670 in @xmath576 . but @xmath76 is a quasi - central element . therefore , when @xmath435 lies in @xmath579 , then @xmath670 and @xmath671 belong to @xmath577 . now assume that @xmath672 where both @xmath358 and @xmath673 lie in @xmath577 . if some @xmath636 in @xmath137 left - divides both @xmath358 and @xmath673 , then @xmath666 also left - divides @xmath358 and @xmath673 . we conclude as in the proof of @xmath418 . in the next section , we are going to apply the above results to parabolic submonoids . we recall that we have fixed a garside monoid @xmath8 with a @xmath2-structure in the introduction of section [ sectionpresgrp ] . [ cornuspeciaux ] let @xmath674 be a parabolic submonoid of @xmath8 . let @xmath136 belong to @xmath137 . + ( i ) if @xmath136 lies in @xmath434 , then @xmath675 ; + ( ii ) if @xmath447 belongs to @xmath479 , then there exists @xmath483 in @xmath434 such that @xmath676 . @xmath418 assume @xmath136 lies in @xmath434 . since @xmath136 left - divides @xmath626 , by the defining properties of a @xmath2-structure , @xmath447 left - divides @xmath626 . but @xmath626 belongs to @xmath479 which is a parabolic submonoid . therefore , @xmath447 belongs to @xmath433 . consequently , @xmath447 lies in @xmath677 , and has to be equal to @xmath626 . + @xmath175 assume @xmath447 belongs to @xmath479 . this implies that @xmath447 lies in @xmath677 , and therefore is equal to a product @xmath678 with @xmath679 in @xmath137 . but @xmath447 is an atom of @xmath3 , hence @xmath680 . we still consider the general notations of section [ sectionpresgrp ] . in lemma [ generquivera ] , we have seen that the quiver @xmath568 whose edges are the @xmath447 is a generating quiver for the groupoid @xmath4 . in corollary [ cornuspeciaux ] , we have seen that among the @xmath447 there is two kinds of atoms of @xmath3 , like in the case of artin - tits groups of spherical type ( _ cf . _ example [ exemplnufunctspheratgp ] ) . in the sequel , for every parabolic submonoid @xmath681 of @xmath8 , and every element @xmath136 that belongs to @xmath137 , we denote by @xmath682 the element @xmath447 when it belongs to @xmath479 , and by @xmath683 otherwise . similarly , we write @xmath684 or @xmath685 for @xmath453 , depending whether or not this atom lies in @xmath479 . for instance , for every @xmath136 in @xmath434 , one has @xmath686 . [ lemfghbvcasc ] let @xmath479 and @xmath687 be parabolic submonoids of @xmath8 . assume @xmath682 lies in @xmath677 and @xmath688 belongs to @xmath436 . then , there exists @xmath689 in @xmath690 such that @xmath691 since @xmath682 lies in @xmath677 and @xmath688 belongs to @xmath436 , the element @xmath692 belongs to @xmath690 . but @xmath682 is an atom of the category @xmath3 . therefore @xmath692 is also an atom of @xmath3 . by corollary [ cornuspeciaux ] , we are done . [ mpolkiujyh]let @xmath479 and @xmath687 be parabolic submonoids of @xmath8 . assume that @xmath435 is equal to @xmath693 and lies in @xmath436 , where @xmath694 ; assume furthermore that @xmath477 belongs to @xmath479 and @xmath512 belongs to @xmath695 . then , + ( i ) the lcm and the gcd in @xmath8 of @xmath435 and @xmath477 for the left - divisibility is @xmath696 and @xmath105 , respectively . + ( ii ) the lcm and the gcd in @xmath8 of @xmath435 and @xmath512 for the right - divisibility is @xmath697 and @xmath105 , respectively . assume @xmath680 . if @xmath636 in @xmath137 left - divides both @xmath435 and @xmath477 , then @xmath636 lies in @xmath434 and @xmath698 left - divides @xmath683 . this is impossible because in this case we would have @xmath699 . therefore , the gcd in @xmath8of @xmath435 and @xmath477 for the left - divisibility is @xmath105 . similarly , the gcd of @xmath435 in @xmath8 and @xmath512 for the right - divisibility is @xmath105 ( we recall that @xmath688 is equal to some @xmath700 ) . let @xmath701 in @xmath433 be such that @xmath702 . the gcd of @xmath701 and @xmath435 for the left - divisibility is @xmath105 by the first part of the proof . thus , @xmath697 is the lcm of @xmath435 and @xmath512 for the right - divisibility . similarly , @xmath696 is the lcm in @xmath8 of @xmath435 and @xmath477 for the left - divisibility . assume @xmath703 . by an easy induction on @xmath478 we deduce from the case @xmath680 that the element @xmath696 is the lcm of @xmath435 and @xmath477 for the left - divisibility . similarly @xmath697 is the lcm of @xmath435 and @xmath512 for the right - divisibility . finally , we deduce from the latter result the last part of the lemma : let @xmath704 be the gcd of @xmath435 and @xmath477 for the left - divisibility . since @xmath479 is a parabolic submonoid , @xmath704 belongs to @xmath479 . in particular the lcm of @xmath704 and @xmath435 for the left - divisibility , which is @xmath435 , has to be equal to @xmath705 . then @xmath706 . similarly , the gcd of @xmath435 and @xmath512 for the right - divisibility is @xmath105 . [ lemsecdecpodeslcmdesnu ] let @xmath479 be a parabolic submonoid of @xmath8 and consider @xmath687 , @xmath707 two parabolic submonoids of @xmath8 which are distinct from @xmath433 . assume @xmath683 and @xmath688 belong to @xmath436 and @xmath481 , respectively . then , there exist a parabolic submonoid @xmath708 , a path @xmath709 in @xmath710 and a path @xmath711 in @xmath712 such that @xmath713 we can assume @xmath714 . the category @xmath3 is a garside category with @xmath568 for atom graph . then we can decompose @xmath715 in the category @xmath3 : @xmath716 by lemma [ lemfghbvcasc ] , we can assume without restriction that there exists @xmath484 and @xmath717 such that @xmath718 is equal to @xmath719 if and only if @xmath720 , and that @xmath721 is equal to @xmath722 if and only if @xmath723 . let us set @xmath724 and @xmath725 , and consider @xmath726 such that @xmath727 . since @xmath435 and @xmath90 belong to @xmath687 , the elements @xmath505 and @xmath477 lie in @xmath687 . but @xmath505 has to right - divide @xmath728 . then , by lemma [ mpolkiujyh ] , we have @xmath729 . similarly , @xmath730 that is @xmath731 . finally we get @xmath732 since the lcm of @xmath435 and @xmath90 for the right - divisibility has to be @xmath105 . [ theorpreseconjplusa ] let @xmath146 be a monoidal garside structure with a @xmath2-structure . denote by @xmath137 the atom set of @xmath440 , and by @xmath1 its group of fractions . consider the set @xmath562 of equalities of paths in @xmath733 : that hold in @xmath3 and such that in equalities of type ( [ deregalite ] ) the two paths correspond to two decompositions of @xmath715 as in equation ( [ lemsecdecpodeslcmdesnu2 ] ) of lemma [ lemsecdecpodeslcmdesnu ] . + then , @xmath737 is a presentation of @xmath4 as a groupoid . the garside group @xmath1 has a @xmath2-function , then @xmath4 is a garside groupoid , with @xmath3 as garside category . therefore , it is enough to prove that @xmath737 is a presentation of @xmath3 as a category . we already know that @xmath568 is a generating quiver of @xmath3 . now , let @xmath38 be the congruence on @xmath738 defined by the relations considered in the theorem . let @xmath739 and @xmath740 be two paths in @xmath741 . clearly , if the two paths are @xmath38-equivalent , they represent the same element in @xmath742 . conversely , assume they represent the same element in @xmath742 and let us prove that they are @xmath38-equivalent . using defining relations ( [ reldeuxdelaprese ] ) of @xmath38 , we obtain a path @xmath743 which is @xmath38-equivalent to the path @xmath739 . similarly , we also obtain a path @xmath744 which is @xmath38-equivalent to the path @xmath740 . by lemma [ mpolkiujyh ] the equalities @xmath745 and @xmath746 hold in @xmath8 ( see the proof of lemma [ lemsecdecpodeslcmdesnu ] ) . from theorem [ theoremcentralisateurgeneralisationpicantin ] , it follows that the two paths @xmath747 and @xmath748 are @xmath38-equivalent , using the relations of type ( [ relundelaprese ] ) . finally , @xmath749 and @xmath750 are @xmath38-equivalent by lemma [ lemtechnordset ] . define @xmath434 to be the set made of the paths in @xmath751 whose images in @xmath752 right - divides @xmath749 . we define a noetherian partial order on @xmath434 by saying that for @xmath753 in @xmath434 , one has @xmath754 if @xmath755 in @xmath751 , or the image of @xmath756 in @xmath3 strictly right - divides the image of @xmath757 . we define @xmath23 as the set of pair of elements of @xmath434 that have the same image in @xmath752 . we fix for every element @xmath53 in @xmath752 a representing path @xmath758 in @xmath751 . we define @xmath759 in the following way . let @xmath760 belong to @xmath23 . write @xmath761 and @xmath762 and assume they are distinct . let @xmath34 be minimal such that @xmath763 . choose an arbitrary defining relation @xmath764 of type ( [ deregalite ] ) . there exists @xmath53 in @xmath752 such that @xmath765 is equal to the image of @xmath756 in @xmath752 . we set @xmath766 and @xmath767 . by lemma [ lemtechnordset ] , and with its notations , there exists @xmath220 such that @xmath768 . the results follows easily . given a garside monoid with a right partial action on a set , dehornoy shows in @xcite that under a technical hypothesis , a natural garside category can be associated with this action . we note that the positive ribbon category @xmath3 does not arised trivially in this way . actually , we can not defined a right partial action of @xmath8 on the set of its parabolic submonoids by setting for an atom @xmath136 that @xmath769 where @xmath471 is such that @xmath447 belongs to @xmath770 . for instance , consider the braid group @xmath771 with the notations of example [ exagpat ] ; then @xmath772 whereas @xmath773 . indeed , we do not have the equality @xmath774 but @xmath775 which is a relation of type ( [ deregalite ] ) in theorem [ theorpreseconjplusa ] . [ lemtechnordset ] let @xmath776 be a noetherian partially ordered set with an infimum element denoted by @xmath105 . assume @xmath23 is a subset of @xmath777 that contains @xmath778 and which is stabilized by the maps @xmath779 . assume @xmath780 is such that @xmath781 for @xmath48 in @xmath23 , and @xmath782 and @xmath783 for @xmath784 . consider @xmath785 defined inductively by @xmath786 and @xmath787 for @xmath788 . for every @xmath789 in @xmath23 , there exists @xmath220 such that @xmath768 . \(i ) for every @xmath435 which lies in @xmath448 , there exists a unique pair @xmath791 such that @xmath792 with @xmath505 in @xmath677 and @xmath793 in @xmath794 . + ( ii ) let @xmath439 belong to @xmath795 . assume @xmath792 and @xmath796 with @xmath726 in @xmath677 and @xmath797 in @xmath794 . then @xmath441 is equal to @xmath798 , and @xmath442is equal to @xmath799 . [ lemstructconjnu ] @xmath418 it has been proved when proving theorem [ theorpreseconjplusa ] . + @xmath175 it is clear that @xmath798 is a common multiple of @xmath435 and @xmath90 . conversely , any common multiple of @xmath435 and @xmath90 is a common multiple of @xmath800 and @xmath801 for the left - divisibility . but the lcm of the latter is @xmath798 by lemma [ mpolkiujyh ] ( the lcm of @xmath793 and @xmath512 lies in @xmath795 by lemma [ lemsecdecpodeslcmdesnu ] ) . similarly , @xmath799 is a common left - divisor of @xmath435 and @xmath90 . now , let @xmath802 belong to @xmath448 with @xmath484 in @xmath677 and @xmath803 in @xmath794 , and assume @xmath478 left - divides both @xmath435 and @xmath90 . using that @xmath435 is the lcm of @xmath435 and @xmath478 for the left - divisibility , we get that @xmath484 and @xmath803 left - divide @xmath505 and @xmath793 , respectively . by the same argument , @xmath484 and @xmath803 also left - divide @xmath477 and @xmath512 , respectively . we deduce that @xmath484 and @xmath803 left - divide @xmath804 and @xmath805 , and finally that @xmath478 left - divides @xmath799 . let @xmath146 be a monoidal garside structure such that @xmath8 has a @xmath2-structure . denote by @xmath137 its atom set , and by @xmath1 its group of fractions . the subgroupoid @xmath14 of @xmath4 generated by the @xmath683 is a standard parabolic subgroupoid of @xmath4 . furthermore , let @xmath806 denote the subgraph of @xmath568 with the same vertex set and whose edges are the @xmath683 . let @xmath807 be the set of relations of type ( 3 ) that appear in theorem [ theorpreseconjplusa ] . then @xmath808 is a presentation of @xmath14 as a groupoid . we recall that the notion of a parabolic subcategory has been introduced in definition [ defparasucat ] . we only need to prove that @xmath790 is a parabolic subcategory of @xmath404 and that @xmath808 is a presentation of @xmath790 as a category . let @xmath479 be a parabolic subcategory of @xmath8 with @xmath809 as garside element . the lattice @xmath794 is a sublattice of @xmath448 by lemma [ lemstructconjnu ] . for similar reason , @xmath810 is a sublattice of @xmath454 . by definition @xmath268(a_x^{\scriptscriptstyle + } ) $ ] is equal to @xmath76 and we can decompose @xmath76 as a product @xmath811 . clearly , @xmath812 lies in @xmath448 . as @xmath479 is a parabolic submonoid , no element of @xmath434 can left - divides @xmath812 . this implies that @xmath812 lies in @xmath794 . we claim that the equalities @xmath813_{\conjplusa } = [ 1,\delta]_{\conjplusa}\bigcap\ { \conjplusanu}_{a_x^{\scriptscriptstyle + } \to\cdot } = \delta\land{\conjplusanu}_{a_x^{\scriptscriptstyle + } \to\cdot}\ ] ] hold . this proves that @xmath790 is a parabolic subcategory of @xmath404 . indeed , this equalities are direct consequences of lemma [ lemstructconjnu ] : assume @xmath435 lie in @xmath814 and assume it belongs to @xmath815_{\conjplusa}$ ] . write @xmath792 with @xmath505 in @xmath677 and @xmath793 in @xmath794 . by lemma [ lemstructconjnu ] , @xmath505 and @xmath793 left - divide @xmath809 and @xmath812 , respectively , and @xmath729 if and only @xmath435 left - divides @xmath812 . we recall that in the case of an artin - tits group @xmath1 with @xmath137 as a generating set , every subset @xmath816 of @xmath137 generates a standard parabolic subgroup with @xmath816 as atom set . in this particular case , we can precise the statement of the theorem [ theorpreseconjplusa ] . [ antelastprop ] let @xmath146 be a monoidal garside structure such that @xmath8 is an artin - tits monoid of spherical type . denote by @xmath137 its atom set and by @xmath1 its associated artin - tits group . assume that @xmath434 is a non empty subset of @xmath137 and let @xmath449 lie in @xmath817 and be distinct . then @xmath818 has exactly two representing path in the free category @xmath733 . one begins with @xmath683 and the other with @xmath688 . one has @xmath819 and @xmath820 ( _ cf . _ example [ exemplnufunctspheratgp ] ) . therefore , @xmath818 is equal to @xmath821 and , in particular , @xmath822 is equal to @xmath823 , which is a simple element of @xmath8 ( _ c.f . _ definition [ defisimplelem ] ) . consider in @xmath733 a representing path @xmath824 of @xmath818 such that @xmath825 and @xmath826 . given @xmath827 and @xmath828 , the set @xmath829 is uniquely defined by the equality @xmath830 . we can write @xmath831 now it is well - known that the simple elements of an artin - tits monoid are _ square free _ : no representing word of a simple element has a square of an element of @xmath137 as a subfactor . this implies that for every @xmath832 , the element @xmath828 is uniquely defined by the two conditions @xmath833 and @xmath834 . thus , there is a unique representing path of @xmath818 in @xmath733 that starts with @xmath683 . similarly , there is a unique representing path of @xmath818 in @xmath733 that starts with @xmath688 . in @xcite , bessis defined a _ weak garside group _ to be a group that is isomorphic to some vertex group @xmath835 of a garside groupoid @xmath6 . clearly a garside group is a weak garside group , but there is no obvious general reason for a weak garside group to be a garside group @xcite . in this section , we consider a garside group @xmath1 with a @xmath2-function and the subgroup @xmath323 of some vertex group @xmath836 that is generated by the atoms of @xmath4 that belong to @xmath836 . under some assumptions that hold in the case of an artin - tits group of spherical type , we prove ( _ cf . _ theorem [ thgarssubg ] ) that @xmath323 is a garside group . this section is inspired by ( * ? ? ? * theorem b ) . we still assume that @xmath146 is monoidal garside structure such that @xmath8 has a @xmath2-structure . we still denote by @xmath137 and @xmath1 the atom set and the group of fractions of @xmath8 , respectively . for all the section , we fix a standard parabolic subgroup @xmath10 of @xmath1 . we set @xmath837 following @xcite , we call the elements of @xmath838 the _ shakers _ of @xmath10 . it is immediate that the set of shakers @xmath838 is equal to @xmath839 . there is two kinds of shakers , namely the @xmath682 and the @xmath683 ; in the sequel , we denote by @xmath840 the set @xmath841 , which is equal to the set @xmath842 . furthermore , we denote by @xmath843 and by @xmath844 the sets @xmath845 and @xmath846 respectively . there is no reason to expect that @xmath847 in general . similarly , we set @xmath848 and @xmath849 . finally , in the sequel we extend the notation previously used for parabolic submonoids and parabolic subgroups : for every subset @xmath434 of @xmath8 , we denote by @xmath850 and @xmath851 the submonoid of @xmath8 and the subgroup of @xmath1 , respectively , generated by @xmath434 . below , we consider @xmath852 and @xmath853 , which are submonoids of @xmath854 . [ lemthgarsubg ] assume @xmath855 is a parabolic submonoid of @xmath8 , and denote by @xmath856 its garside element . then , + ( i ) the elements of @xmath838 belong to @xmath855 . + ( ii ) one has @xmath857 , and every atom of @xmath3 that appears in any decomposition of @xmath856 as a product of atoms in @xmath448 belongs to @xmath838 . + ( iii ) one has @xmath858 . write @xmath859 . then @xmath812 belongs to @xmath860 , and every atom of @xmath790 that appears in any decomposition of @xmath861 in @xmath794 as a product of atoms belongs to @xmath840 . \(i ) all the elements of @xmath843 left - divide @xmath856 , which lies in @xmath448 . then , by the defining properties of the @xmath2-structure , it follows that the elements of @xmath862 left divides @xmath856 . but @xmath855 is a parabolic submonoid , therefore all the elements of @xmath862 belong to @xmath855 . + ( ii ) the set @xmath852 is included in @xmath863 by @xmath418 . conversely , consider an element @xmath435 of @xmath8 which lies in @xmath863 and choose an arbitrary decomposition @xmath864 of @xmath435 in @xmath448 ( where @xmath825 ) . by definition of a @xmath2-structure , we can assume without restriction that each @xmath828 left - divides @xmath718 ; otherwise , if we consider @xmath865 that left - divides @xmath718 , then we have @xmath866 . the assumption that @xmath855 is a parabolic submonoid implies that all the @xmath828 belong to @xmath855 . therefore , we get step - by - step that all the @xmath827 are equal to @xmath434 . then @xmath435 belongs to @xmath852 . if we applied the above argument to @xmath867 we get the second part of @xmath175 . + ( iii ) the element @xmath809 belongs to @xmath677 and no element of @xmath434 can left - divides @xmath812 . indeed , if an @xmath136 in @xmath137 left - divides @xmath812 , then @xmath868 is a simple element of @xmath8 and therefore can not lie in @xmath479 . then , @xmath812 lies in @xmath860 ( _ cf . _ lemma [ lemstructconjnu]@xmath418 ) and the atoms of @xmath790 that appears in any decomposition of @xmath861 belongs to @xmath840 . [ thgarssubg ] let @xmath146 be a monoidal garside structure such that @xmath8 has a @xmath2-structure . denote by @xmath137 its atom set and by @xmath1 its associated garside group . let @xmath433 be a parabolic submonoid of @xmath8 such that @xmath869 . if the monoid @xmath855 is a parabolic submonoid of @xmath8 whose garside element is denoted by @xmath856 , then + ( i ) the subgroup @xmath870 is a standard parabolic subgroup of the groupoid @xmath4 with @xmath10 as unique object . in particular , @xmath870 is a garside group . the garside element of @xmath871 is @xmath856 and its atom set is @xmath838 . + ( ii ) write @xmath859 . the subgroup @xmath872 of @xmath1 is a ( standard ) parabolic subgroup of @xmath870 with @xmath812 for garside element , and @xmath873 @xmath418 the element @xmath856 belongs to @xmath874 and we have @xmath875_{\conjplusa } \subseteq [ 1_{a_x^{\scriptscriptstyle + } } , \delta]_{\conjplusa } \cap a^{\scriptscriptstyle + } _ { { \sh}(x ) } \subseteq \left(\delta\wedge a^{\scriptscriptstyle + } _ { \lsh(x)}\right)\cap { \conjplusa}_{a_x^{\scriptscriptstyle + } \to\cdot } \hfill\cr\hfill \subseteq \left(\delta_{{\lsh}(x)}\wedge a^{\scriptscriptstyle + } _ { \lsh(x)}\right)\cap { \conjplusa}_{a_x^{\scriptscriptstyle + } \to\cdot } \subseteq [ 1_{a_x^{\scriptscriptstyle + } } , \delta_{\lsh(x)}]_{\conjplusa}.}\ ] ] the first inclusion follows from lemma [ lemthgarsubg]@xmath175 , and the third one from the fact that @xmath433 be a parabolic submonoid of @xmath8 . by lemma [ lemthgarsubg]@xmath175 , we also get that @xmath874 is a sublattice of @xmath448 for the left - divisibility : let @xmath435 and @xmath90 belong to @xmath874 , then their gcd and their lcm for the left - divisibility lie in @xmath876 because the latter is a parabolic submonoid of @xmath8 . but , they also lie in @xmath448 . then , by lemma [ lemthgarsubg]@xmath175 , they lie in @xmath874 , and they are common divisor and common multiple , respectively , of @xmath435 and @xmath90 in @xmath876 . since we assume @xmath869 , by symmetry , @xmath874 is a sublattice of @xmath454 for the right - divisibility . + @xmath877 we have to prove that @xmath853 is a parabolic submonoid of @xmath874 , with @xmath812 as garside element . this is a consequence of lemma [ lemthgarsubg]@xmath421 and [ lemstructconjnu ] with a proof similar to @xmath175 . it is clear that @xmath853 normalizes @xmath878 and both subgroups generate @xmath870 . finally , we have a semi - direct product because the submonoids @xmath878 and @xmath853 are parabolic with a trivial intersection . indeed , the left greedy normal of every element in the intersection of the parabolic subgroups @xmath879 and @xmath872 has to be trivial . in order to state the next result , we recall that an artin - tits group of spherical type is said to be _ indecomposable _ when it is not the direct product of two of its proper standard parabolic subgroups . [ lastprop ] let @xmath146 be a monoidal garside structure such that @xmath8 is an artin - tit monoid of spherical type , with @xmath137 as set of atoms and @xmath1 as associated artin - tits group . assume that @xmath434 is a subset of @xmath137 . the subgroup @xmath870 is an artin - tits group of spherical type with @xmath838 as associated atom set . in particular , if @xmath449 are distinct in @xmath817 , the associated relation ( [ deregalite ] ) of the presentation of @xmath3 stated in theorem [ theorpreseconjplusa ] is @xmath880 for some positive integer @xmath881 . when @xmath882 is indecomposable with @xmath883 , the subgroups @xmath870 of @xmath1 where @xmath884 are classified by the _ tables of relations r2 _ of ( * ? ? ? * appendix 5 ) . by theorem [ thgarssubg ] , we know that @xmath870 is a garside group with @xmath838 as associated atom set . now , consider the decomposition @xmath885 of @xmath818 that starts with @xmath683 in @xmath733 ( _ cf . _ proposition [ antelastprop ] ) . by assumption , @xmath886 . by the argument of the proof of proposition [ antelastprop ] , we get @xmath887 , then @xmath888 , and step - by - step that @xmath889 . similarly @xmath890 . finally , @xmath891 because otherwise we could decompose @xmath892 as a product @xmath893 with @xmath894 , which is impossible . then @xmath870 is an artin - tits group of spherical type with @xmath838 as associated atom set . the proof of the remaining is a case by case computation , which is the same as in @xcite . theorem [ thgarssubg ] of the previous section claims that the group @xmath870 is a semi - direct product of two of its subgroups . in order to established that result , we use lemma [ lemstructconjnu ] @xmath418 . if we were dealing with groups instead of categories in the latter , we would have use the notion of a group semi - direct product in order to state it . the notion of a _ semi - direct product of categories _ is not so easy to defined , even though one can find a definition in @xcite , or more recently in @xcite . the notion of a _ zappa - szp product _ , as covered in @xcite , appears as more natural . * lemma 3.2 and 3.9 ) let @xmath6 be a category and @xmath895 be two subcategories of @xmath6 . we say that @xmath6 is an ( _ internal _ ) _ zappa - szp product _ of @xmath896 and @xmath897 if every morphism @xmath435 of @xmath6 can be uniquely decomposed as a product @xmath898 where @xmath505 is a morphism of @xmath896 and @xmath793 is a morphism of @xmath897 . in this case , we write @xmath899 . then , lemma [ lemstructconjnu]@xmath418 claims that @xmath900 where @xmath901 be the totally disconnected category whose objects are the parabolic submonoids of @xmath8 and whose vertex monoid at @xmath433 is @xmath902 . clearly , in our context , we have more than a zappa - szp product . let us introduce the following definition : let @xmath6 be a category and @xmath895 be two subcategories of @xmath6 such that @xmath899 . assume @xmath896 is equal to a totally disconnected category that is the union of its vertex monoids @xmath903 . we say that @xmath6 is a _ semi - direct product _ of @xmath896 and @xmath897 when for every @xmath435 in @xmath904 one has @xmath905 . in this case , we write @xmath906 . so , for instance one has @xmath907 . this definition extends the standard definition of a semi - direct product of monoids , and is a special case of the definition considered in @xcite . we finish this article with the following result which generalizes ( * ? ? ? * prop . 4 ) and provides a nice description of the connection between the standard parabolic subgroups of a garside group . [ theodescnormal]let @xmath146 be a monoidal garside structure such that @xmath8 has a @xmath2-structure . denote by @xmath1 the group of fractions of @xmath8 . + ( i ) let @xmath908 be the totally disconnected groupoid whose objects are the parabolic subgroups of @xmath1 and whose vertex group at @xmath10 is @xmath909 . then , @xmath910 ( ii ) let @xmath9 be the groupoid whose objects are the parabolic subgroups of @xmath1 , whose morphism set @xmath911 from @xmath10 to @xmath11 is @xmath12 , and whose composition is the product in @xmath1 . let @xmath13 be the totally disconnected groupoid whose objects are the parabolic subgroups of @xmath1 and whose vertex group at @xmath10 is @xmath10 . then , @xmath912 note that @xmath9 is the full subgroupoid of @xmath913 ( see definition [ defngc ] ) whose objects are the parabolic subgroups of @xmath1 . its vertex groups are normalizers of standard parabolic subgroups . this result holds in particular when @xmath1 is an artin - tits group of spherical type . @xmath418 the unique not obvious fact is that @xmath4 is equal to the zappa - szp product @xmath914 . this is a consequence of the zappa - szp product decomposition of @xmath3 , since @xmath4 , @xmath908 and @xmath14 are the groupoids of fractions of the garside categories @xmath3 , @xmath915 and @xmath790 , respectively ( where @xmath915 is the totally disconnected category whose objects are the parabolic submonoids of @xmath8 and whose vertex monoid at @xmath433 is @xmath916 ) . + @xmath175 again the unique not obvious fact is that conj(a ) = @xmath917 . the unicity of the decomposition follows easily from lemma [ lemstructconjnu]@xmath175 . let @xmath435 lie in @xmath1 such that @xmath918 . we show there exist @xmath359 in @xmath10 and @xmath919 in @xmath920 such that @xmath921 . there exists @xmath922 and @xmath505 in @xmath8 such that @xmath923 . furthermore , there exists a parabolic submonoid @xmath924 of @xmath8 such that @xmath591 belongs to @xmath925 . in particular , we have @xmath926 . we can write @xmath927 such that @xmath928 belongs to @xmath479 , @xmath929 belongs to @xmath707 , no elements of @xmath434 left - divides @xmath930 and no element of @xmath467 right - divides @xmath930 . now , let @xmath48 belongs to @xmath434 and @xmath931 be the left greedy normal form of @xmath932 in @xmath1 . there exists @xmath673 in @xmath8 such that @xmath933 and @xmath934 . since @xmath932 belongs to @xmath935 , the elements @xmath358 and @xmath168 belongs to @xmath707 . by the assumption on @xmath930 , this implies @xmath936 and @xmath937 . therefore @xmath938 is included in @xmath707 and by symmetry , @xmath939 . therefore , @xmath930 lies in @xmath481 and we have @xmath940 with @xmath941 in @xmath479 and @xmath942 in @xmath943 . using @xmath418 , we are done . garside categories , periodic loops and cyclic sets . . hermann , 1968 . on the zappa - szp product . ( 2005 ) 393424 normalizers of parabolic subgroups in coxeter groups . , 2 ( 1999 ) , 323351 . the language of geodesics for garside groups . ( 2004 ) 495509 . groupe de garside . ( 2002 ) 267306 . left - garside categories , self - distributivity , and braids . . aussian groups and garside groups , two generalisations of artin groups . ( 1999 ) 569604 . garside and locally garside categories . . phd thesis , universit de picardie - jules verne , 2001 . normalisateur et groupe dartin de type sphrique . ( 2003 ) 263274 . garside subgroups of garside groups parabolic subgroups of garside groups ( 2007 ) 116 . Abstract:

Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.

Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered . Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video . Paper: the absence of diffusion of waves in disordered media was predicted by anderson 50 years ago @xcite . originally proposed in the context of electronic transport in disordered crystals , it has since been observed for different types of waves , including light and sound . recently , direct observations of the anderson localization by disorder @xcite and of a localization transition by quasiperiodic potentials @xcite of quasi one - dimensional ( 1d ) matter waves of ultracold atoms were reported . these experiments pave the way to the observation of new phenomena and shed new light on long standing problems , amongst which the question of possible anderson localization in presence of interactions . in the present paper we consider the case of an atomic vapor described as a weakly interacting bose gas in the presence of a weak disorder ( what is meant by `` weak '' here will be made quantitative in sec . [ model ] ) . in this configuration it has been shown theoretically in refs . @xcite and supported by numerical simulations in ref . @xcite that a small amount of disorder does not drastically alter the _ equilibrium _ properties of the system , but merely decreases the condensate and superfluid fractions . furthermore , even in the 1d limit considered in the present work , it has been experimentally demonstrated in refs . @xcite that one can observe global phase coherence in the presence of disorder and remain far from , say , the bose glass phase originally proposed by giamarchi and schulz and fisher _ et al . _ @xcite . here we are interested in _ transport _ properties . specifically , we study a quasi 1d , weakly interacting bose einstein condensate ( bec ) , propagating through a disordered potential . in this context , localization has been theoretically studied mainly for effective _ attractive _ interactions ( see , e.g. , @xcite and references therein ) , with less attention on the _ repulsive _ case we consider here ( see , however , refs . @xcite ) . in the absence of an external potential , ( repulsive ) interactions make the system superfluid and introduce a new characteristic speed in the system , the speed of sound @xmath2 . as mentioned above , when the speed @xmath3 of the bec relative to the external potential tends to zero , the addition of a weak random potential preserves superfluidity , although with a reduced superfluid fraction . what happens as @xmath3 increases ? this question was investigated in a previous publication @xcite , where the disordered potential , of length @xmath0 , was modeled by a series of randomly located delta peaks . for small velocities @xmath4 , perturbation theory shows that the superfluidity is preserved , e.g. , the flow is dissipationless and with a perfect transmission . in contrast , in the high speed limit @xmath5 , where the kinetic energy dominates over the interaction energy , the transport properties of the bec are deeply altered , and tend to those of the non - interacting gas , displaying an exponential damping of the transmission with length @xmath0 , a behavior characteristic of the strong anderson localization . thus , two limiting cases of stationary flow have been identified @xcite , with contrasting transport properties : superfluidity in the deep subsonic regime , and anderson localization in the deep supersonic one . in between , in the region @xmath6 where both interaction and kinetic energies are important , it was shown that stationary scattering solutions do not exist : one reaches a regime of time - dependent flows with more or less ( depending on the speed ) complex density excitations . the range of speeds around @xmath2 where this phenomenon is observed increases as the length @xmath0 increases . the different types of existing flows are summarized in fig . [ fig1 ] . through a disordered potential @xmath7 consisting in a series of uncorrelated delta peaks extending over a domain of size @xmath0 [ cf . ( [ e2a ] ) and the discussion in sec . [ sec - lstar ] ] . dark region : time dependent flow ; light gray ( light blue online ) regions : stationary flow . in the supersonic case , the yellow solid line corresponds to the threshold @xmath1 between these two domains as determined from eq . ( [ tstar - impl ] ) . the blue dashed line is the localization length @xmath8 ( [ exp1 ] ) . the supersonic region below @xmath8 denoted as `` ballistic '' corresponds to the region where the perturbation theory of sec . [ pts ] applies . note the enlarged scale for @xmath9 $ ] . [ fig1 ] ] in the present study we concentrate on the supersonic stationary region of the phase diagram [ gray ( light blue online ) @xmath10 region in fig . [ fig1 ] ] . in this domain we provide analytical and numerical evidence of anderson localization in the presence of interaction for different types of disorder . we compute analytically the interaction - dependent localization length as well as the corresponding distribution of transmission coefficients . we also explain the disappearance of the supersonic stationary flow observed at a given velocity for increasing length of the disordered sample . this onset of time dependence is an important qualitative effect revealed by our study . we show that it is directly connected to interaction effects and provide an analytical estimate of the length @xmath1 of the disordered region above which most of the realizations of the random potential lead to time dependent flows ( see fig . [ fig1 ] ) . the paper is organized as follows . in sec . [ model ] we present the model and identify its range of validity . in sec . [ seciii ] we take some time to properly define the transmission coefficient of a bose - condensed beam over an obstacle . in [ seciv ] we introduce the different types of disordered potentials studied in the present work . in sec . [ ssr ] we present analytical and numerical results showing that anderson localization is indeed possible in the supersonic regime . we consider the three possible supersonic regimes : perturbative ( sec . [ pts ] ) , anderson localized ( sec . [ non - pert ] ) and onset of time dependence ( sec . [ sec - lstar ] ) . in sec . [ experiment ] we discuss experimental strategies and possible signatures for the observation of anderson localization in an interacting bose - einstein condensate . finally we present our conclusions in sec . [ conclusion ] . some technical points are given in the appendixes . in appendix [ app1 ] we derive the probability distribution of transmission in a special case ( perturbative regime and correlated gaussian potential ) . in appendix [ app2 ] we present the derivation of the fokker - plank equation ( [ dmpk ] ) for the distribution of the transmission coefficients . we study here the transport properties of a quasi - one - dimensional ( 1d ) bose - einstein condensate formed of particles of mass @xmath11 , experiencing a repulsive effective interaction ( characterized by the 3d s - wave scattering length @xmath12 ) , in the presence of an obstacle represented by the external potential @xmath13 . the potential is not necessarily disordered at this point , the only restriction we impose throughout the present work is that it should have a finite extent , i.e. , @xmath14 when @xmath15 . the configuration we consider corresponds to the `` 1d mean field regime '' @xcite ( see also the discussion in ref . @xcite ) , where the system is described by a 1d order parameter @xmath16 depending on a single spatial variable : the coordinate @xmath17 along the direction of propagation . @xmath16 obeys the nonlinear schrdinger equation @xmath18\psi\ ; .\ ] ] in all the present work we choose to work in the `` laboratory frame '' where the condensate is initially at rest . ( [ e1 ] ) describes its 1d dynamics in the presence of an obstacle moving at constant velocity @xmath3 in this frame , which corresponds to the experimental situation where an obstacle is swept through a condensate initially at rest , see e.g. refs . @xcite . on the theoretical side , one should imagine that , from an initial static configuration where the condensate is at rest with @xmath19 , the potential intensity and speed have been slowly ramped up to a point where the condensate dynamics is described by eq . ( [ e1 ] ) . we choose @xmath20 , this corresponds to a potential moving from left to right in the laboratory frame . the reduction of the motion of the condensate to a single spatial dimension is typically achieved through a transverse harmonic confining potential of pulsation @xmath21 . we choose a normalization such that @xmath22 is the linear density of the condensate . in this case , the interaction amongst particles results in eq . ( [ e1 ] ) in the nonlinear term @xmath23 , with @xmath24 @xcite . in the stationary regime , where the flow is time independent in the frame moving with the potential , @xmath25 depends on @xmath17 and @xmath26 only through the variable @xmath27 . the appropriate boundary condition is @xmath28 ( where @xmath29 is a constant ) ( see @xcite and the discussion in section [ stationary_regime ] below ) . the condensate is then characterized by a chemical potential @xmath30 , a speed of sound @xmath31 and a healing length @xmath32 . it is customary to characterize the transverse confinement via the `` harmonic oscillator length '' @xmath33 . with @xmath34 denoting a typical order of magnitude of @xmath35 , the 1d mean field regime in which eq . ( [ e1 ] ) is valid corresponds to a density range such that @xmath36 in this domain the wave function of the condensate can be factorized in a transverse and a longitudinal part @xcite . the transverse wave function is gaussian ( this is ensured by the condition @xmath37 ) , the longitudinal one is of the form @xmath38 and @xmath16 satisfies eq . ( [ e1 ] ) @xcite . the left - hand side ( l.h.s . ) inequality in eq . ( [ s1.0 ] ) prevents the system to enter in the tonks - girardeau regime . more precisely , a general analysis of 1d bose gas shows that at zero temperature no bec is possible @xcite . this results in a algebraic decrease of the one body density matrix monitored by phase fluctuations occurring over a phase - coherence length @xmath39 @xcite . hence the results obtained using eq . ( [ e1 ] ) are valid if they describe structures with a characteristic length scale smaller than @xmath40 . the l.h.s . inequality in eq . ( [ s1.0 ] ) ensures that @xmath40 is exponentially large compared to the healing length . if one considers , for instance , @xmath41rb or @xmath42na atoms in a guide with a transverse confinement characterized by @xmath43 hz , the ratio @xmath44 is roughly of order @xmath45 and restriction ( [ s1.0 ] ) still allows the density to vary over four orders of magnitude . even if the mean field approach is legitimate in 1d , the effects of disorder have to be taken into account with some care . it may well be that the introduction of a disordered potential @xmath13 in eq . ( [ e1 ] ) modifies the properties of the ground state . this is indeed the case as shown in refs . @xcite : a disordered potential decreases the condensate and the superfluid fraction , but the effects are weak provided the intensity of the disorder remains weak ( see ref . @xcite for an extension to finite temperature ) . more precisely , in the case of a disorder formed by randomly spaced delta impurities with density @xmath46 ( see sec . [ delta ] ) one can show @xcite that , in the dilute impurity limit , at @xmath47 the non - superfluid fraction ( normal part ) is proportional to @xmath48 [ the notations are those of eq . ( [ e2a ] ) ] and thus remains small provided the dimensionless coefficient @xmath49 is small ( weak disorder limit ) . at finite @xmath3 , the normal fraction is multiplied by a factor @xmath50^{-3/2}$ ] ( see ref . @xcite ) , which diverges when @xmath51 . one thus expects the mean field approach to fail near the region @xmath52 of fig . this is supported by the numerical results presented in @xcite . hence , in the center of the time - dependent region of fig . [ fig1 ] we can not trust the results obtained from eq . ( [ e1 ] ) . however , far from this region , the 1d mean field approach is expected to be valid even in presence of ( weak ) disorder , as experimentally demonstrated in refs . @xcite . in the present work we characterize the localization properties of the condensate in the random potential by studying the transmission coefficient . ( [ e1 ] ) being non linear , the definition of transmission and reflection coefficients needs to be treated with special care . this is the purpose of the present section where we first define the stationary regime ( section [ stationary_regime ] ) and then the transmission coefficient within this regime ( section [ transmis ] ) . it is customary to perform a madelung transformation and to write @xmath53 where @xmath35 is the density and @xmath54 the local velocity . from ( [ e1 ] ) one can check that they verify the continuity equation @xmath55 the stationary regime is defined as the regime where the system is at rest in the frame moving with the obstacle . in this case , in the laboratory frame @xmath25 , @xmath56 , @xmath57 and @xmath58 are time dependent , but they depend on @xmath17 and @xmath26 only through the variable @xmath27 . it is then possible to get a first integral of ( [ e2 ] ) under the form @xmath59 in the case of subsonic ( @xmath60 ) and stationary motion , the flow is superfluid and the order parameter is only affected in the vicinity of the obstacle , with @xmath61 and @xmath62 @xcite . for @xmath63 , a regime of stationary flow also exists but in this case the obstacle induces density oscillations with a pattern stationary in its rest frame @xcite . this means that in the laboratory frame the phase velocity of these waves is identical to the velocity @xmath3 of the obstacle . on the other hand , the energy transferred from the obstacle to the fluid propagates with the group velocity , which in the case of bogoliubov excitations is greater than the phase velocity , i.e. as just argued than @xmath3 . as a consequence , radiation conditions require that the wake is always located ahead of the obstacle , i.e. , upstream , with no long - range perturbation of the fluid on the downstream side @xcite . this means that in this case the flow far in the downstream region remains unperturbed , with @xmath64 and @xmath65 . the two possible stationary configurations ( subsonic and supersonic ) are represented in fig . [ fig2 ] . ( 9,5.5 ) ( 1,0 ) ( @xmath66 ) . in both plots the potential is represented by a thick solid line ( hatched down to zero ) and the density profile is represented by a thin solid line.[fig2],title="fig:",width=302 ] ( 0.5,3.)downstream ( 6.7,3.)upstream ( 1,2.7)(1,0)7.5 ( 6.6,2.3)@xmath27 ( 1.4,1.7)@xmath67 ( 1.4,5.3)@xmath67 ( 3.2,1.)@xmath68 ( 3.8,5.)@xmath68 ( 0,1.5)@xmath29 ( 0.4,1.55)(1,0)0.5 ( 0,5.03)@xmath29 ( 0.4,5.08)(1,0)0.5 hence , in any stationary configuration ( subsonic or supersonic ) , the above reasoning fixes the integration constant in the right hand side ( r.h.s . ) of eq . ( [ e3 ] ) to its value at @xmath69 , i.e. , @xmath70 . in the stationary regime one gets from eqs . ( [ e1 ] ) and ( [ e3 ] ) @xmath71 where @xmath72 and @xmath73 \ ; .\ ] ] in this section we restrict the analysis to the stationary regime of section [ stationary_regime ] , and define the transmission of the condensate through the obstacle represented by a potential @xmath13 ( not necessarily disordered ) verifying @xmath74 . as the wave equation ( [ e1 ] ) is nonlinear , one can not , in general , properly define reflection and transmission coefficients , since it is generally not possible to disentangle incoming and reflected waves in the nonlinear flow upstream the obstacle . however , following a procedure devised in ref . @xcite ( see also @xcite ) , we will show that one can define a transmission and a reflection coefficient in the limit of small nonlinearity as well as in the limit of weak reflection and arbitrary nonlinearity . outside the scattering region , @xmath75 and one can get a first integral of eq . ( [ e4 ] ) under the form @xmath76 which defines the `` free '' asymptotic density profiles . @xmath77 in eq . ( [ t1 ] ) are integration constants . the boundary condition discussed in the previous section imposes @xmath78 and @xmath79 when @xmath80 . this fixes the value @xmath81 . the value of @xmath82 at @xmath83 has to be determined by the integration of eq . ( [ e1 ] ) ( cf . ref . ( [ t1 ] ) expresses the energy conservation for a fictitious classical particle with `` mass '' @xmath84 , `` position '' @xmath85 and `` time '' @xmath86 , evolving in a potential @xmath87 ( whose typical shape is displayed in fig . [ fig3 ] ) . this type of analysis is common in the study of nonlinear equations such as eq . ( [ e1 ] ) , see e.g. , the review @xcite ( the first time we found it used is in ref . it is employed here as a convenient tool for getting intuition about the behavior of the solution of the gross - pitaevskii equation ( see below ) . as a function of @xmath88 ( drawn for @xmath89 ) . the fictitious particle has a classical energy @xmath82 when @xmath90 . the ( red ) dashed line corresponds to an approximation of @xmath91 by @xmath92 , obtained by keeping only the first term in expansion ( [ t3a]).[fig3 ] ] from now on we restrict to the supersonic stationary regime where an imperfect transmission occurs ( in the subsonic stationary regime one has perfect transmission ) . in this case the fictitious particle is initially ( i.e. , when @xmath66 ) at rest at the bottom of the potential @xmath87 with @xmath93 . the behavior of @xmath85 for @xmath94 depends on the value of @xmath95 . a stationary solution exists only if @xmath96 remains bounded , i.e. , if @xmath97 ( where @xmath98 corresponds to the local maximum of @xmath87 , see fig . [ fig3 ] ) . in this case , the asymptotic behavior of @xmath99 corresponds to oscillations between the values @xmath100 and @xmath101 defined in fig . 3 . for future references we note that @xmath91 is zero when @xmath102 and when @xmath103 , and that the derivative @xmath104 is zero when @xmath102 and when @xmath105 , with @xmath106 at large velocity , when @xmath107 , one has @xmath108 and @xmath109 writing @xmath110 we now argue that , following ref . @xcite , one can write a perturbative version of ( [ t1 ] ) in a limit where @xmath111 we emphasize that restriction ( [ t2 ] ) corresponds to @xmath112 ( i.e. , small oscillations ) only when @xmath3 is of order of @xmath2 or smaller . the approach developed below is however able to tackle large relative density oscillations ( @xmath113 ) at large velocities ( @xmath107 ) @xcite . in this sense it will allow us to penetrate in the non perturbative regime where the upstream density oscillations are large and the transmission is low . using the variable @xmath114 , we write eq . ( [ t1 ] ) in the upstream region ( @xmath90 ) as @xmath115 where @xmath116 . a simple limited expansion around @xmath117 yields @xmath118 where @xmath119 and @xmath120 the second term in the r.h.s . of expansion ( [ t3a ] ) is small compared to the first one precisely in the limit ( [ t2 ] ) . in the following we restrict to this regime and neglect the second term of the r.h.s . of ( [ t3a ] ) . this corresponds to approximating the exact @xmath91 by the ( red online ) dashed line in fig . [ fig3 ] and to write eq . ( [ t3 ] ) under the form @xmath121 where the dimensionless parameter @xmath122 is defined by @xmath123 the solution of eq . ( [ t4 ] ) is @xmath124 where @xmath125 and @xmath126 is a phase factor . we recall that eq . ( [ t6 ] ) describes the density oscillations in the upstream region @xmath90 . these oscillations can be described as the sum of incident and reflected waves ( @xmath127 and @xmath128 ) of the form @xmath129 this analysis allows one to determine the reflection and the transmission coefficients as @xmath130 of course the sum of the incident @xmath127 and the reflected @xmath131 waves ( [ t6c ] ) is an approximate solution of the nonlinear schdinger equation ( [ e1 ] ) which is only valid in regime ( [ t2 ] ) , i.e. , in the regime of arbitrary interaction and small transmission ( @xmath132 ) , or in the regime of arbitrary transmission and small interaction ( @xmath107 ) . up to this point we presented a theory valid for any potential of finite extent . from now on we concentrate on the particular case of random potentials . we denote @xmath133 an arbitrary random potential , and use a subscript when dealing with one of the particular cases defined below . the first potential of interest , analyzed in ref . @xcite , is a series of @xmath135 randomly located identical delta peaks of the form : @xmath136 the intensity of the peaks is measured by the ( non random ) positive quantity @xmath137 . the scatterers have random uncorrelated positions @xmath138 , with mean density @xmath139 and average separation @xmath140 . hence the potential extends over a mean length @xmath141 . denoting henceforth the disorder average by @xmath142 , for @xmath17 and @xmath143 inside the disordered region one gets the mean value @xmath144 and the irreducible two - point correlation function @xmath145 where @xmath146 another commonly used model of disorder is provided by gaussian random processes with zero average . we consider here potentials which are non zero only over a region of finite extent ( with typical size @xmath0 ) and generate them in the following way ( see , e.g. , chap . 5 of ref . @xcite and references therein ) : let s consider a gaussian white noise @xmath147 extending over all the real axis , with zero mean and second moment @xmath148 . then for a given function @xmath149 one defines @xmath150 where @xmath151 is a parameter characterizing the disorder and whose meaning is explained below . if @xmath152 were a delta function , then @xmath153 would be a gaussian white noise over @xmath154 $ ] ( and zero everywhere else ) . the actual function @xmath149 has a finite extension , and this induces finite correlations in the disordered potential . from ( [ e2d ] ) it is clear that @xmath155 . if the domain of integration in the r.h.s . of ( [ e2d ] ) were extended to all @xmath156 , @xmath153 would have a gaussian distribution @xmath157}{\sqrt{2\pi\sigma^2 } } \ ; , \ ] ] where @xmath158 defining the correlation function @xmath159 as @xmath160 one would get in this case @xmath161 with a fourier transform @xmath162 where @xmath163 is the fourier transform of @xmath152 . imposing here the normalization condition @xmath164 leads to a two - point correlation function ( [ e2f0 ] ) which is as in eq . ( [ e2b ] ) of the form of @xmath165 multiplied by a function whose integral over @xmath17 equals unity [ @xmath166 in ( [ e2f0 ] ) instead of @xmath167 in ( [ e2b ] ) ] . thus , with definition ( [ e2d ] ) and normalization ( [ e2cbis ] ) , @xmath151 plays for disorder ( [ e2d ] ) the same role as @xmath168 [ eq . ( [ e2c ] ) ] for disorder ( [ e2a ] ) : it characterizes the amplitude of the fluctuations of the potential . the typical extent of @xmath149 will in turn characterize the range of the correlations . since @xmath153 as given by eq . ( [ e2d ] ) is typically non zero only over a region of finite extent , eqs . ( [ e2f0 ] ) and ( [ e2f ] ) are only correct if @xmath17 and @xmath143 are inside this region . more precisely , they should be in this region , at a distance from 0 or @xmath0 larger than the typical extent @xmath169 of the function @xmath152 . in the following we always consider the case where @xmath0 is very large compared to @xmath169 ( otherwise one could simply not speak of a disordered region ) and it is clear that the characteristics of the disorder are properly defined only inside the disordered region . we consider two special cases of correlation corresponding to different forms of @xmath152 : a lorentzian @xmath170 and a gaussian @xmath171 we denote the corresponding potentials by @xmath172 and @xmath173 . for the correlation functions one gets respectively @xmath174 and @xmath175 in both cases @xmath169 is the typical correlation radius . the choice of a lorentzian correlated disordered potential originates from experimental and theoretical results in the case of micro - fabricated guides . in this type of setting , the atoms are magnetically guided over a chip @xcite . unavoidable imperfections and irregularities in the design of the circuit induce fluctuations in the current which , in turn , result in a random contribution to the magnetic field used for guiding the atoms . thus the potential seen by the atoms has a random component which is typically lorentzian correlated , with a correlation length @xmath169 which decreases when the distance between the guide and the chip increases @xcite . the gaussian correlated potential @xmath173 is more academic but , by comparison with the results obtained with @xmath172 it allows one to check what is really specific to the lorentzian case , and what is a mere effect of finite correlation length . another experimentally relevant type of disorder is the so called speckle potential which is generated by an optical speckle field produced by a laser beam passing through a diffusing plate @xcite . the corresponding potential will be denoted by @xmath176 and may be mathematically generated as follows @xcite : @xmath177 { \rm d}y \right|^2 , \ ] ] where @xmath178 and @xmath179 are two independent gaussian white noise processes of zero mean with @xmath180 ( @xmath181 and @xmath182 or 2 ) . here also we characterize the disorder by studying its statistical properties in the limit where the domain of integration in the r.h.s . of ( [ e2l ] ) is extended to all @xmath156 . in this case one gets @xmath183 where @xmath184 is given by formula ( [ s2 ] ) ( replacing @xmath152 by @xmath185 ) . this yields @xmath186 and the correlation function defined in eq . ( [ e2f0 ] ) reads here @xmath187 \\ = & 4 \left [ \int_{\mathbb{r}}\!\!{\rm d}y\ , w_{\sss s}(x - x'+y)w_{\sss s}(y ) \right]^2 \ ; . \end{split}\ ] ] contrarily to the choice ( [ e2cbis ] ) , @xmath185 should not be normalized to unity here because from eq . ( [ e2l ] ) this is homogeneity - wise impossible . instead , the choice @xmath188 corresponds to the typical experimental situations @xcite and leads to a correlation function @xmath189 whose integral over @xmath17 equals unity and whose fourier transform is @xmath190 hence , definition ( [ e2l ] ) and choice ( [ ws ] ) correspond here also to characterizing the amplitude of the disorder s fluctuations by the parameter @xmath151 and the range of the correlations by @xmath169 . as explained in ref . @xcite , and recalled in the introduction , anderson localization in a weakly repulsive bose - einstein condensate is only possible in the supersonic regime ( cf . [ fig1 ] ) which we consider now . in the present section we first analyze the transmission across a short disordered sample , in which case perturbation theory is applicable ( sec . [ pts ] ) . we then turn to generic non - perturbative configurations ( sec . [ non - pert ] ) where anderson localization is expected . in this regime we obtain evidences of the occurrence of anderson localization in the presence of interaction . finally we discuss the upper limit of the localized regime and the onset of time dependent flows for long disordered samples ( sec . [ sec - lstar ] ) . in the supersonic stationary regime , simple perturbation theory yields @xmath191 where @xcite @xmath192 \ ; , \ ] ] and @xmath193 is given by eq . ( [ pt4 ] ) . perturbation theory always predicts a stationary density profile . this is certainly wrong when @xmath3 is close to @xmath2 ( cf . fig . [ fig1 ] ) , but in this case @xmath193 gets very small and one precisely goes out of the domain of validity of perturbation theory ( @xmath194 as given by ( [ spt1 ] ) is no longer small compared to @xmath29 ) . far ahead of the obstacle ( in a region where @xmath195 is larger than @xmath169 and @xmath196 ) ( [ spt1 ] ) gives @xmath197 the perturbative regime in which eqs . ( [ spt1],[spt2 ] ) are valid is also the one where the constant @xmath122 in ( [ t5],[t6 ] ) is small compared to unity . this can be inferred from the comparison of ( [ spt2 ] ) and ( [ t6 ] ) which indeed shows that @xmath132 in the regime where ( [ spt2 ] ) holds and that , in this case , @xmath198 ) , yielding @xmath199 from ( [ spt3 ] ) it is clear that the average reflection coefficient is @xmath200 furthermore , one can show that the corresponding probability distribution of the reflection coefficient is poissonian with @xmath201 note that for properly normalizing this probability distribution for @xmath202 $ ] , one should include in the prefactor of the r.h.s . of ( [ spt4 ] ) a correcting term of order @xmath203 which can be safely neglected in the limit ( [ spt5 ] ) . we give in appendix [ app1 ] a demonstration of result ( [ spt4 ] ) for the special case of a correlated gaussian potential @xmath153 of type ( [ e2d ] ) . below , we show that the same result holds for a potential @xmath7 of type ( [ e2a ] ) [ see eq . ( [ dmpk0 ] ) in section [ non - pert ] ] , and we checked numerically that it is also the case for the speckle potential @xmath176 ( [ e2l ] ) ( cf fig . [ fig4 ] ) . in all these cases , the average reflection coefficient reads ( up to the above discussed exponentially small correction ) @xmath204 where @xmath205 we recall that the function @xmath206 depends on the type of disorder considered . for a potential of form ( [ e2a ] ) one has @xmath207 , for the other potentials considered in this work it is given by ( [ e2j ] ) , ( [ e2k ] ) and ( [ csq ] ) . concomitantly to distribution ( [ spt4 ] ) of reflection coefficients one gets for the transmission @xmath208 from ( [ e7b ] ) [ or ( [ spt10 ] ) ] one gets @xmath209 the perturbative approach holds when @xmath210 i.e. , when @xmath211 . this corresponds to the region which is denoted as `` ballistic '' in fig . [ fig1 ] @xcite . its accuracy is shown for @xmath212 in fig . [ fig4 ] for a speckle potential @xmath176 of type ( [ e2l ] ) ( we also checked this prediction for the potentials @xmath213 and @xmath173 , with also excellent results ) . for the transmission coefficient @xmath214 in a potential @xmath176 with @xmath215 , @xmath216 and @xmath217 moving at velocity @xmath218 in a condensate of initial constant density @xmath219 . the corresponding localization length is @xmath220 . the histogram corresponds to a statistical analysis of the results of the numerical solution of eq . ( [ e1 ] ) for 10000 different random potentials . the solid line is the perturbative result ( [ e7b]).[fig4 ] ] at this stage , @xmath8 is simply a notation for expression ( [ spt11 ] ) , but it will be shown to be the actual localization length of the matter wave in a disordered potential ( in section [ non - pert ] ) . the results derived here also hold for a noninteracting gas , obtained by taking the limit @xmath221 in eq . ( [ e1 ] ) , in which case @xmath222 and @xmath223 . ( [ spt11 ] ) , with @xmath193 replaced by @xmath224 , then coincides with the antsygina - pastur - slyusarev formula for the localization length @xcite and the distribution of transmissions ( [ e7b ] ) holds , with @xmath225 . in the present work , those formulas are modified to include interactions . the generalization simply consists in replacing the wave vector @xmath226 by @xmath227 . this replacement has , as an important physical consequence , the effect of diminishing , at a given speed @xmath3 , the localization length ( there is an effective reduction of the available kinetic energy by the repulsive interactions ) . for instance , in the case of a potential @xmath7 , since @xmath228 , there is a relative difference @xmath229 between @xmath230 and @xmath231 , that is 11 @xmath232 for @xmath233 . this is illustrated in fig . [ fig5 ] , which displays the average @xmath234 as a function of @xmath0 for a disorder @xmath7 of type ( [ e2a ] ) , with and without interactions . for a potential @xmath7 ( characterized by @xmath235 and @xmath236 ) . in the interacting case @xmath237 and @xmath238 . the non - interacting case is drawn for the same velocity and corresponds to a value @xmath239 . in both cases the dashed line is the analytical result ( [ e7 ] ) and the solid line corresponds to a statistical analysis of the results of the numerical solution of eq . ( [ e1 ] ) for 15000 different random potentials . the departure of the numerical results from the dashed lines occurs when the systems leaves the perturbative regime.[fig5 ] ] when the size @xmath0 of the sample is large compared to the value @xmath8 determined in section [ pts ] , the perturbative approach fails . we now propose a non perturbative method allowing to treat both the regimes @xmath240 and @xmath241 and showing that @xmath8 , as defined in eq . ( [ spt11 ] ) , is indeed the localization length in the presence of interactions . within the framework of the non perturbative approach , we are able to provide approximate analytical results in the case of the model disorder potential ( [ e2a ] ) . this potential being zero between two impurities , one can write a series of first integrals of eq . ( [ e4 ] ) in each segment @xmath242x_n , x_{n+1}[$ ] as follows : @xmath243 = e^{(n)}_{\rm cl } \ ; .\ ] ] in the region @xmath244 the integration constant @xmath245 of eq . ( [ t1 ] ) is denoted as @xmath246 in ( [ np1 ] ) ( taking @xmath247 ) and is zero , whereas in the region @xmath248 one has @xmath249 ( and @xmath250 ) . as a function of @xmath85 ( drawn for @xmath89 ) . for @xmath244 , the fictitious particle is initially at rest at the bottom of potential @xmath87 with @xmath251 . the value of the classical energy changes from @xmath252 to @xmath253 at each impurity @xmath254 . the lower panel displays the corresponding oscillations of @xmath99 , with two impurities at @xmath255 and @xmath256 ( their position is indicated by vertical dashed lines).[fig6],title="fig : " ] as a function of @xmath85 ( drawn for @xmath89 ) . for @xmath244 , the fictitious particle is initially at rest at the bottom of potential @xmath87 with @xmath251 . the value of the classical energy changes from @xmath252 to @xmath253 at each impurity @xmath254 . the lower panel displays the corresponding oscillations of @xmath99 , with two impurities at @xmath255 and @xmath256 ( their position is indicated by vertical dashed lines).[fig6],title="fig : " ] from ( [ e4 ] ) it is a simple matter to show that the matching condition of the density at impurity position @xmath254 is @xmath257 where @xmath258 [ @xmath259 denotes the limit of the derivative @xmath260 at the left [ at the right ] of @xmath254 . relation ( [ np1a ] ) between the derivatives of the amplitude results [ from eq . ( [ np1 ] ) ] in a relation between the classical energies : @xmath261 \ ; .\ ] ] hence , eq . ( [ np1 ] ) allows to draw a classical analogous of the solution of the nonlinear schdinger equation in the presence of potential ( [ e2a ] ) formed by a series of delta peaks : the fictitious classical particle defined in sec . [ transmis ] evolves in the potential @xmath87 and experiences kicks at `` times '' @xmath254 . each kick changes the `` energy '' according to ( [ np2 ] ) , as illustrated in fig . the key point in the remaining of this section will be to derive the probability distribution of @xmath262 which then directly allows one to get the distribution of @xmath122 s and of the transmission coefficients [ through eqs . ( [ t5 ] ) and ( [ t7 ] ) ] . let us introduce the quantities @xmath263 the parameters @xmath122 and @xmath264 defined in ( [ t5 ] ) and ( [ t6b ] ) are related to the ones of eq . ( [ np2a ] ) by @xmath265 and @xmath266 ( i.e. , @xmath122 is the last of @xmath267 s ; the same holds for @xmath264 ) . denoting by @xmath268 the value of the phase @xmath126 [ appearing in([t6 ] ) ] for @xmath269x_{n-1},x_{n}[$ ] , one gets in this domain [ the derivation is exactly the same as for eq . ( [ t6 ] ) ] @xmath270 and one can rewrite eq . ( [ np2 ] ) as @xmath271 \nonumber \\ & + & \frac{4\hbar^2}{m b^2 } \lambda_{n-1 } \sqrt{\kappa^2 b^2 + 1 } \ ; \zeta_{n-1 } \ ; , \end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath272 \ ; .\ ] ] using definition ( [ np2a ] ) one can rewrite eq . ( [ np3 ] ) in terms of the parameter @xmath267 as @xmath273 eqs . ( [ np3],[np5 ] ) are valid provided ( [ t2 ] ) holds , _ i.e. _ , provided @xmath274 , which reads @xmath275 in the following we also impose the condition @xmath276 precisely , we neglect all the quantities of order @xmath277 . this is an important technical point . it facilitates the analysis by allowing one to get simple formulas as we now illustrate in the perturbative case : eq . ( [ np5 ] ) allows for instance to compute the average value of the reflection coefficient in the perturbative regime ( as already done in section [ pts ] , eq . ( [ spt10 ] ) ) . in this regime , additionally to condition ( [ np5b ] ) one has @xmath278 . then eq . ( [ np5 ] ) implies at leading order @xmath279 which , together with the initial condition @xmath280 , leads immediately to @xmath281 which is identical to result ( [ spt10 ] ) in the case of a potential @xmath7 for which @xmath282 [ cf . ( [ spt11 ] ) ] . let us now proceed and consider the generic non perturbative regime where @xmath283 may become large compared to unity and where ( [ t2 ] ) and ( [ np5b ] ) are still valid . taking the condition ( [ np4a ] ) into account , eq . ( [ np5 ] ) reads @xmath284 it is natural to assume that the phase of the cosine in the r.h.s . of ( [ np4b ] ) is uniformly distributed in @xmath285 $ ] and independent of the phase at step @xmath286 . this could be called a `` phase randomization '' approximation . this relies on hypothesis ( [ np4a ] ) and on the assumption that there is a large number of density oscillations over the ( random ) length between @xmath287 and @xmath288 , i.e. , @xmath289 then , the argument of the cosine in definition ( [ np4b ] ) is uniformly distributed , @xmath290 s are uncorrelated random variables , with all the same law characterized by its average @xmath291 and variance @xmath292 note that the regimes ( [ np4a ] ) and ( [ gnp2bis ] ) imply that @xmath293 which in turn implies that the kinetic energy @xmath294 is much larger than @xmath295 ; _ i.e. _ , one is exactly in the anderson regime where the incident kinetic energy is much larger than the typical value of the ( disordered ) potential representing the obstacle . hence a classical particle would flow almost unperturbed over the potential but , as we shall see , a quantum particle experiences an exponentially small transmission . let @xmath296 be the probability that @xmath267 lies in the interval @xmath122 , @xmath297 . going to the continuous limit and defining the continuous variable @xmath298 [ where @xmath299 is the parameter ( [ spt11 ] ) in the case of a potential @xmath7 ] it is shown in appendix [ app2 ] that @xmath301 verifies the following fokker - planck equation @xmath302\ ; .\ ] ] equation ( [ dmpk ] ) follows directly from eq . ( [ np6 ] ) in the regime where conditions ( [ np4a ] ) and ( [ gnp2bis ] ) hold . it is precisely the dorokhov - mello - pereyra - kumar ( dmpk ) equation @xcite for the transmission in a single disordered channel [ with @xmath303 . equation ( [ dmpk ] ) is sometimes referred to as melnikov s equation ( after ref . @xcite ) but has a much longer history ( see the discussion in refs . @xcite ) . since before entering the disordered region the particle has a classical energy @xmath251 corresponding to @xmath304 , eq . ( [ dmpk ] ) has to be solved for the initial condition @xmath305 where @xmath306 is the one - sided delta function : @xmath307 . in the limit of small @xmath26 ( i.e. , in the perturbative regime @xmath308 ) , @xmath122 remains small and one can approximate in the r.h.s . of ( [ dmpk ] ) the term @xmath309 by @xmath122 . it is then simple to verify that the solution of this approximate equation that satisfies ( [ np8 ] ) is @xmath310 this result for the small @xmath26 solution of the dmpk equation has been already obtained in ref . @xcite ( see also the discussion in ref . the distribution law ( [ dmpk0 ] ) is exactly equivalent to distribution ( [ spt4 ] ) of the reflection coefficient in the perturbative regime and this proves the validity of the poissonian distribution ( [ e7b ] ) for a potential @xmath7 of type ( [ e2a ] ) @xcite . in the general case ( i.e. , for all @xmath311 ) the solution of ( [ dmpk ] ) with the initial condition ( [ np8 ] ) is ( see , _ e.g. _ , refs . @xcite and references therein ) @xmath312 where @xmath313 . from distribution ( [ np9 ] ) , a lengthy computation or alternatively the direct use of the dmpk equation ( [ dmpk ] ) @xcite yields @xmath314 in the large @xmath26 limit , distribution ( [ np9 ] ) tends to a log - normal distribution , i.e. , the distribution of the variable @xmath315 is gaussian ( see ref . @xcite ) @xmath316 from this distribution one gets the correct average @xmath317 , eq . ( [ np10 ] ) , and a standard deviation @xmath318^{1/2 } = \sqrt{2 t}$ ] , which is in agreement with the exact result in the limit @xmath319 @xcite . at the extremity of a sample of length @xmath0 one has @xmath320 , and the distribution ( [ np11 ] ) is the log - normal distribution of transmission typical for anderson localization in the regime @xmath321 ( see , e.g. , ref . @xcite ) . as a side product of this analysis , eqs . ( [ np10 ] ) and ( [ np11 ] ) confirm that @xmath8 is indeed the localization length as was anticipated in the notation . we have tested the validity of the dmpk approach for a bose - einstein beam of interacting particles propagating in a disordered potential @xmath7 of type ( [ e2a ] ) . the numerical results for the probability distribution @xmath322 are compared on fig . [ fig7 ] with the dmpk prediction ( [ np9 ] ) . the agreement is seen to be excellent . the distribution evolves from the poissonian result ( [ e7b ] ) ( for low values of @xmath323 ) towards a distribution peaked at low @xmath214-values for large @xmath323 . in this latter case one can check that the distribution tends to a log - normal by plotting @xmath324 . of type ( [ e2a ] ) ( characterized by @xmath325 and @xmath326 ) plotted for different values of the ratio @xmath327 with @xmath328 . the black solid lines are the dmpk result ( [ np9 ] ) and the colored histograms correspond to the numerical simulations ( 50000 samples used for each value of @xmath26 ) . cases ( a ) , ( b ) , ( c ) and ( d ) correspond respectively to @xmath329 , 0.5 , 1 and 2 . the inset displays @xmath330 as a function of @xmath26 . the thick solid line is extracted from numerical simulations and the thin ( red ) solid line is the dmpk prediction ( [ np10 ] ) . they can be distinguished only around @xmath331 as shown in the blowup of the ( gray ) shaded region for @xmath332 . [ fig7 ] ] we have also checked the validity of the present approach over a sizable range of lengths of disordered region and of intensities of disordered potential by plotting in the inset of fig . [ fig7 ] the average @xmath333 as a function of @xmath323 . the agreement of the numerical results with the dmpk prediction ( [ np10 ] ) is excellent . note however the beginning of a small departure around @xmath334 ; this effect will be studied more thoroughly in sec . [ sec - lstar ] ( cf . [ fig9 ] ) . finally , we discuss numerical results obtained for the disordered potentials introduced in secs . [ gaussian ] and [ speckle ] . although we do not have an analytical derivation of the dmpk equation for these potentials , the numerical results indicate a very good quantitative agreement for a disordered potential @xmath173 and for a speckle potential @xmath176 . we display the comparison of the numerical data with the dmpk predictions for a speckle potential in figure [ fig8 ] . the same agreement is obtained for a gaussian potential @xmath173 . hence , the behavior analytically predicted for the potential @xmath7 appears to be of general validity , meaning that the above defined regime of `` phase randomization '' can probably be extended to correlated potentials , leading to a regime of single parameter scaling . however , we have noticed that , although showing an overall good agreement with the dmpk prediction , the lorentzian correlated potential @xmath172 exhibits some deviations in the tail of the distribution , the details of which will be studied elsewhere . ( characterized by @xmath335 and @xmath336 @xmath337 ) plotted for different values of the ratio @xmath327 with @xmath338 . curves ( a ) , ( b ) and ( c ) corresponds respectively to @xmath339 , 0.52 and 0.68 . for each curve , the black solid line is the dmpk result ( [ np9 ] ) and the colored histogram is the result of 10000 numerical simulations.[fig8 ] ] in the previous sections the main effect of interaction has been shown to be a renormalization of the localization length @xmath8 . interaction induces a modification of the wave vector : expression ( [ spt11 ] ) for the localization length coincides with the noninteracting one but computed for an effective interaction - dependent wave vector @xmath193 given by eq . ( [ pt4 ] ) , instead of @xmath226 . the repulsive interaction diminishes the available kinetic energy and therefore reduces the localization length with respect to the noninteracting case ( since @xmath340 ) . we now discuss another , more spectacular , effect of interactions on the localization properties of a propagating bec on a disordered potential . in the previous sections [ pts ] and [ non - pert ] , we completely neglected the presence of an upper limit for the classical energy @xmath341 , which is given by the local maximum of the effective potential @xmath91 , namely @xmath342 ( see fig . [ fig3 ] ) . trajectories that pass beyond @xmath343 would become unstable and develop singularities with infinitely large density at @xmath344 . in practice this implies , on the level of eq . ( [ e1 ] ) , that a stationary flow can not be maintained in this case and that the disorder induces time - dependent dynamics of the condensate . in the vicinity of @xmath343 , the density profile of the condensate in between two adjacent scatterers becomes quite different from the cosine shape ( [ t6 ] ) that was derived for weak nonlinearities and/or low density modulations , and resembles more to a periodic train of gray solitons @xcite . in a crude approximation , we neglect this complication and assume that the spatial evolution of the density is still given by eq . ( [ t6 ] ) for all classical energies until @xmath345 . trajectories that happen to pass beyond @xmath343 are considered to be `` lost '' , i.e. , they do no longer contribute to the probability distribution for the transmission . this formally amounts to introducing a `` sink '' in the stochastic equation ( [ np6 ] ) , namely at @xmath346 . in the corresponding fokker - planck equation ( [ dmpk ] ) , this sink is appropriately modeled by imposing the boundary condition @xmath347 as a consequence of this boundary condition , the integrated probability distribution @xmath348 is no longer conserved , but decreases with increasing @xmath26 , i.e. , increasing length @xmath0 of the disorder region . in the following , we show how this affects the dmpk predictions of section [ non - pert ] and how the `` survival probability '' , i.e. , the fraction of trajectories that remain below this boundary at given length @xmath0 , can be analytically computed in the limit @xmath107 . in this limit , from eq . ( [ t1c ] ) one gets @xmath349 and thus @xmath350 . modifications of the probability density @xmath301 due to the presence of the sink appear only when the typical value of @xmath122 is of order @xmath351 which , as just remarked , is large compared to unity in the case @xmath107 . in this case @xmath301 is already negligibly small around @xmath352 . we therefore make the approximation @xmath353 in the fokker - planck equation ( [ dmpk ] ) , which then reads @xmath354\ ; .\ ] ] using , from now on , the probability distribution @xmath355 for finding a given value of @xmath315 at fixed @xmath356 , we obtain in this limit @xmath357 where we introduce @xmath358 . clearly , the log - normal distribution ( [ np11 ] ) corresponds to a solution of eq . ( [ lognorm - eq ] ) in the absence of any additional boundaries . in the presence of the sink , which is imposed by the boundary condition @xmath359 with @xmath360 we can straightforwardly find the solution of eq . ( [ lognorm - eq ] ) by subtracting from the log - normal distribution ( [ np11 ] ) a `` mirror '' distribution centered at some @xmath361 ( namely @xmath362 ) with a suitable prefactor . this yields the distribution @xmath363\ ; , \label{lognorm - decay}\end{aligned}\ ] ] which is defined for @xmath364 . clearly , this distribution satisfies the evolution equation ( [ lognorm - eq ] ) as well as the boundary condition @xmath359 for all @xmath26 and the initial condition @xmath365 for @xmath364 . the presence of the sink at @xmath366 explains a phenomenon barely noticeable in fig . 7 , but exemplified in fig . [ fig9 ] , namely the departure of the observed average @xmath367 from the usual dmpk result @xmath368 . this departure is due to the fact that the numerically computed average only takes into account the stationary solutions which as will be seen from eq . ( [ psurv]) become less and less numerous when @xmath26 increases . hence what is computed numerically is the average of @xmath369 over the distribution ( [ lognorm - decay ] ) . this reads @xmath370 - \nonumber \\ & & e^{z_{\rm max } } \left(\frac{t}{2}+ z_{\rm max}\right)\ , \textrm{erfc } \left(\frac{t+z_{\rm max}}{2\sqrt{t}}\right ) \ ; .\label{zmoy_leak}\end{aligned}\ ] ] where the error function is defined by @xmath371 and @xmath372 . expression ( [ zmoy_leak ] ) is compared in fig . [ fig9 ] with the results of a numerical simulation performed in the case @xmath373 ( corresponding to @xmath374 ) for 10000 random potentials @xmath7 of type ( [ e2a ] ) characterized by @xmath326 and @xmath375 ( leading to @xmath376 ) . the agreement is seen to be very good . since the sink cuts the solutions which are strongly scattered by the random potential , the remaining stationary states have a higher transmission coefficient . this effect increases with the sample length @xmath0 , which explains the behavior of the curve in fig . [ fig9 ] . plotted as a function of @xmath327 in the case of random potentials @xmath7 characterized by @xmath326 and @xmath375 . the curve is drawn in the case @xmath373 . the red solid line is the numerical result and the black dashed line is the analytical result ( [ zmoy_leak ] ) . the straight ( thin dashed ) line is the usual dmpk result @xmath377 [ eq . ( [ np10])].[fig9 ] ] as an other test of the validity of our approach ( which amounts to model the upper boundary @xmath378 by a perfect sink and to neglect nonlinear deformations of the density pattern of the flow close to the threshold ) we now determine the probability for a trajectory to remain below the boundary . this survival probability reads @xmath379 \nonumber \\ & & - \frac{e^{z_{\rm max}}}{2 } \ , \mathrm{erfc } \left(\frac{z_{\rm max } + t}{\sqrt{4 t}}\right ) \ ; .\label{psurv}\end{aligned}\ ] ] as anticipated , @xmath380 clearly decreases from @xmath381 ( at @xmath382 ) to 0 ( for large @xmath26 ) . the knowledge of @xmath380 allows to determine the value @xmath1 of the length of the disordered region beyond which most of the random realizations lead to a non - stationary flow of the condensate . we can , most conveniently , define @xmath1 through the condition @xmath383 with @xmath384 . this leads to the implicit equation for the threshold value @xmath385 : @xmath386 this equation can be explicitly solved in the limiting case of large @xmath387 . as it is natural to assume that @xmath385 ought to be of the order of @xmath378 , which is the only relevant scale in this equation , we make the ansatz @xmath388 and assume ( which is to be verified _ a posteriori _ ) that @xmath389 is of the order of unity , whereas @xmath390 . this yields to lowest non vanishing order @xmath391 \ ; , \ ] ] for the left - hand side of eq . ( [ tstar - impl ] ) and @xmath392 \nonumber \\ & = & \frac{1}{\sqrt{\pi\ , z_{\rm max } } } \left [ 1 + \mathcal{o}\left(z_{\rm max}^{-1}\right ) \right ] \ ; , \label{tstar - right}\end{aligned}\ ] ] for the right - hand side of eq . ( [ tstar - impl ] ) . this finally results in @xmath393 neglecting terms of the order of @xmath394 , we therefore obtain for the threshold length @xmath395 \ .\ ] ] we emphasize that eq . ( [ lstar ] ) holds for @xmath396 , i.e. , for @xmath397 [ see eq . ( [ defzmax ] ) ] . this is much more restrictive than the condition @xmath107 which is assumed to hold true when deriving eqs . ( [ lognorm - decay ] ) and ( [ tstar - impl ] ) . plotted as a function of the length @xmath0 of the disordered region . the condensate flow through disorder potentials @xmath7 of type ( [ e2a ] ) was numerically computed for this purpose ( red solid line ) , at parameters for which @xmath398 . the black dashed line shows the analytical prediction of this survival probability @xmath399 according to eq . ( [ psurv ] ) . the vertical dashed line marks prediction ( [ lstar ] ) for the threshold length @xmath1 at which @xmath400 ( horizontal dashed line ) , namely @xmath401 .[fig10 ] ] figure [ fig10 ] shows a comparison of the analytical predictions ( [ psurv ] ) and ( [ lstar ] ) with numerical data obtained from the integration of the time - dependent gross - pitaevskii equation ( [ e1 ] ) . the condensate flows through a disorder potential @xmath7 of type ( [ e2a ] ) with @xmath398 . we see that the fraction of stationary trajectories @xmath380 is very well described by eq . ( [ psurv ] ) , and that the approximate expression ( [ lstar ] ) predicts very well the length @xmath1 at which the crossover length from stationary to time - dependent flow occurs . for velocities @xmath3 not extremely large compared to the speed of sound , the condition @xmath396 will not be fulfilled and estimate ( [ lstar ] ) will not be valid , while @xmath402 might still hold and the average evolution of the system might still be fairly well described by the simplified fokker - planck equation ( [ dmpk - large ] ) . in that case , the implicit equation ( [ tstar - impl ] ) has to be solved numerically . in figure [ fig1 ] one can see that the numerical solution of eq . ( [ tstar - impl ] ) ( yellow solid line ) provides a very reasonable estimate of the boundary between the bright supersonic region ( stationary flows ) and the dark time - dependent region , in a regime of not extremely large @xmath403 , where eq . ( [ lstar ] ) fails to properly predict the threshold length @xmath1 . the simulations are performed by solving eq . ( [ e1 ] ) numerically using a potential of type @xmath7 ( characterized by @xmath404 and @xmath405 ) . for each @xmath3 and @xmath0 we consider 100 realizations of such a potential and statistically determine the quantity @xmath406 , i.e. , the fraction of stationary solutions . @xmath406 is plotted in fig . [ fig1 ] using a gray scale ( dark , @xmath407 ; light blue / gray , @xmath408 ) as a function of the normalized variables @xmath409 and @xmath403 ( this normalization rescales interaction effects ) . the qualitative agreement of figure [ fig1 ] is made quantitative in figure [ fig11 ] . in this figure the numerical solution of eq . ( [ tstar - impl ] ) is compared with its determination extracted from numerical simulations in the supersonic regime . more precisely , the solid ( red ) line in fig . [ fig11 ] is simply the contour @xmath410 in fig . this corresponds exactly to definition ( [ tstar ] ) of @xmath1 . the agreement between the numerical result and the theory of the present section [ dashed curve , solution of eq . ( [ tstar - impl ] ) ] is seen to be excellent @xcite . as a function of @xmath3 in dimensionless units . the black dashed line corresponds to the solution of eq . ( [ tstar - impl ] ) and the red solid line corresponds to the value of @xmath1 extracted from numerical simulations for a potential @xmath7 with the same characteristics as in fig . [ fig1 ] ( see the text).[fig11 ] ] we conclude this section by emphasizing that the existence of an upper threshold @xmath1 corresponding to lengths of the disordered region beyond which most of the flows are time - dependent is a genuine nonlinear effect [ absent if one sets @xmath411 in eq . ( [ e1 ] ) ] . actually , whereas interactions only weakly modify the precise value of the localization length , the existence of the threshold @xmath1 is a remarkable qualitative effect induced by nonlinearity . moreover , as illustrated in figures [ fig9 ] and [ fig10 ] , this effect persists even in the limit @xmath107 where naively one would expect no noticeable consequence of interaction . on the basis of the results obtained in the previous section we present here what are the more favorable experimental configurations for observing anderson localization in an interacting bose - einstein beam . we also discuss a possible experimental signature of localization . in the non - interacting regime the only condition for observing anderson localization in 1d is that the size of the disordered region should be larger than the localization length . then one can observe an exponential decay of transmission with a log - normal distribution ( in the limit @xmath321 ) . the situation is more complex when interactions are turned on . what is particularly interesting is the interplay between localization and superfluidity . indeed these two phenomena are conflicting one with the other : superfluidity is the ( counterintuitive ) ability to pass over an obstacle without reflection whereas anderson localization corresponds to a large reflection in a domain where one would expect almost perfect transmission . as a result of the interplay between these two extreme phenomena , and depending on the fluid velocity and on the sample size , the flow may be stationary and superfluid , dissipative and time dependent or stationary supersonic ( and also dissipative ) @xcite . anderson localization does not occur in the superfluid region ( where the transmission is perfect ) and either does not exist or can not be clearly identified in the time dependent regime ( where interference effects are washed out @xcite ) ; but is truly observed in the supersonic stationary regime , as demonstrated in sec . [ ssr ] . in that regime , a first experimentally relevant effect is the modification of the localization length with respect to its value in the absence of interactions . this effect is very well described by renormalizing the wave vector @xmath224 to @xmath193 [ eq . ( [ spt11 ] ) ] , which means that part of the kinetic energy available to the flow is taken by interactions . however , as already discussed in ref . @xcite this effect is only sizable in a regime where @xmath3 is not too large compared to @xmath2 , and is thus relevant only in the perturbative regime ( cf . [ fig5 ] ) . a second experimentally observable effect is the modification of the localization length due to the correlations of the disordered potential . this is described by formula ( [ spt11 ] ) where @xmath206 is the fourier transform of the two - point correlation function of the disorder . for the different potentials considered here , @xmath412 for a potential @xmath7 or is alternatively given by eqs . ( [ e2j ] ) , ( [ e2k ] ) and ( [ csq ] ) for correlated potentials . explicitly this yields @xmath413 for a potential @xmath7 of type ( [ e2a ] ) ; @xmath414 for a potential @xmath173 of type ( [ e2d ] ) ; @xmath415 for a potential @xmath172 of type ( [ e2d ] ) ; and @xmath416 for a potential @xmath176 of type ( [ e2l ] ) ( when @xmath417 ) . the validity of these expressions has been tested in sec . [ non - pert ] . in the non - interacting case ( i.e. , @xmath223 ) , expressions ( [ exp1 ] ) to ( [ exp4 ] ) correspond to a high energy limit and can be obtained through a first order born expansion within the phase formalism of refs . @xcite . in all three cases , one sees that the localization length is drastically enhanced due to the non - zero correlation length with respect to the uncorrelated disorder , eq . ( [ exp1 ] ) . in the gaussian and the lorentzian cases the localization length scales exponentially with @xmath418 and @xmath419 , respectively [ see eqs . ( [ exp2],[exp3 ] ) ] . in the case of a speckle potential , the effect is even stronger : one sometimes speaks of an `` effective mobility edge '' @xcite , meaning that beyond a critical wave - vector ( or a critical velocity ) the localization length ( [ exp4 ] ) is infinite . this is an artifact of the antsygina - pastur - slyusarev formula ( [ spt11 ] ) which can be corrected by going to higher orders ( see refs . @xcite ) : the corrections to this result give a localization length which is finite , but typically larger than any other relevant scale in experimental systems . hence , in all the cases the dependence of the localization length with respect @xmath193 ( i.e. , with velocity ) is amplified by correlations . mathematically this is due to the fact that the denominator in the antsygina - pastur - slyusarev formula ( [ spt11 ] ) for the localization length in presence of correlations tends to zero when @xmath420 . in order to minimize this effect one needs to impose the following condition : @xmath421 in the r.h.s . of eq . ( [ exp5 ] ) we replaced @xmath193 by @xmath422 because in practice condition ( [ exp5 ] ) is verified in regimes where @xmath423 , i.e. , when the approximation @xmath424 is sound . note that this condition is arbitrary and is only superficially analogous to the 3d ioffe - regel criterion @xcite . the latter defines a true mobility edge that separates a metallic from a localized phase whereas eq . ( [ exp5 ] ) only requires that the localization length does not get too large . understood in this sense , the criterion ( [ exp5 ] ) is exactly equivalent to the definition of an `` effective mobility edge '' sometimes used in the literature . in the absence of interactions it is always possible ( at least theoretically ) to define a system with a length @xmath425 which verifies ( [ exp5 ] ) ; i.e. , a system where one can observe anderson localization . if we now turn on interactions , a major effect is the appearance of a length scale @xmath1 which signals the onset , for @xmath426 , of a regime of time - dependent flows ( cf . [ sec - lstar ] ) . in this regime , anderson localization disappears , and the time - averaged transmission coefficient scales as @xmath427 @xcite . this is the most spectacular effect of interactions in the transport properties of the system . in order to observe anderson localization , the system size should therefore satisfy @xmath428 . in practice , one should be in a regime of parameters such as illustrated in fig . [ fig12 ] : the crossing @xmath429 has to occur at a velocity lower than @xmath430 . and the solid line is the threshold length @xmath1 . @xmath431 is the typical velocity beyond which it is almost impossible to observe anderson localization in a realistic system ( see text ) . the ( blue ) colored zone corresponds to the region where anderson localization can be experimentally observed in presence of interaction.[fig12 ] ] based on the numerical solution of eq . ( [ tstar - impl ] ) one can show that the crossing @xmath432 occurs at a velocity @xmath433 @xcite ( see also fig . [ fig1 ] ) . this condition only allows the system to reach a ( stationary ) regime where @xmath434 . but if one wants to observe anderson localization one should be able to reach a regime where @xmath435 say , in order to get as close as possible to the domain of log - normal distribution of transmissions still remaining in the region of stationary flows . this imposes @xmath436 . this must be supplemented by condition ( [ exp5 ] ) , i.e. @xmath437 . hence the correlation length @xmath169 should be smaller or equal to @xmath438 . fig . [ fig13 ] shows the phase diagrams of a one dimensional interacting beam of condensed atoms moving through a speckle potential in this regime . for plotting this diagram one has generated 16 random potentials and studied in each case if a stationary solution exists or not . the dark blue region corresponds to a domain where no stationary solution exists while the light blue one corresponds to a domain where all the potentials admit a stationary solution ( the color code is the same as in fig . [ fig1 ] and is explained in sec . [ sec - lstar ] ) . the region between @xmath8 and @xmath1 in figure [ fig13 ] is the region where one can observe anderson localization . for a beam with velocity @xmath3 moving in a speckle disorder of extent @xmath0 . the figure has been drawn for a potential @xmath176 of type ( [ e2l ] ) characterized by @xmath335 and @xmath439 . the light blue region corresponds to a domain of stationary flow ( @xmath408 : 100 @xmath232 of the solutions are stationary , see the explanation in the text ) ; the dark region corresponds to time dependent flow . the curves indicating the values of @xmath8 and @xmath1 correspond to the analytical results ( [ exp4 ] ) and to the numerical solution of eq . ( [ tstar - impl]).[fig13 ] ] let us now evaluate the orders of magnitude of the different parameters allowing one to reach the appropriate regime . for concreteness we consider a beam of @xmath41rb atoms such as the one of the atom optics group at laboratoire charles fabry de linstitut doptique . for a correlation length of 0.26 @xmath440 m the velocity cut - off for observing anderson localization is roughly @xmath441 mm / s . note that in ref . @xcite the velocity of the expanding condensate is about 1.6 mm / s , i.e. , smaller that @xmath430 as it should . if we use the parameters of ref . @xcite ( @xmath442 , @xmath443 mm / s , @xmath444 nm , @xmath445 atoms/@xmath440 m , @xmath446 mm / s and @xmath447 @xmath440 m ) it is impossible to satisfy condition ( [ exp5 ] ) because @xmath443 mm / s @xmath448 and also because @xmath449 . however the atom optics group has recently improved the sensitivity of its detectors which is now close to being able to detect a density as small as 1 atom/@xmath440 m . this allows one to work with a smaller density and to improve the ratio @xmath450 which can be tuned down to the value of @xmath451 . then the localization length can be selected by tuning the speckle amplitude . for instance @xmath452 mm can be obtained by choosing @xmath453 hz at @xmath454 mm / s . these parameters are close to those used in fig . [ fig13 ] and are reachable experimentally . however , for observing anderson localization one needs to keep the beam stable for almost 1 s ( 0.31 s if we want @xmath455 ) whereas in the current experiment this is only possible during 0.1 s , hence it is still a matter of debate to decide if the observation of anderson localization of a bose condensed beam in the presence of interaction is within the reach of present time technology . it is also interesting to make a connection between the physics described here and the recent experiment observation of anderson localization of a condensate expanding in a disordered potential performed in the same group @xcite . contrarily to the propagation of a beam studied in the present work , ref . @xcite considers the spreading of a wave packet ( initially at rest ) in a speckle potential . after a first stage of expansion , mainly driven by interactions , the experimental cloud expands with a constant velocity @xmath456 mm / s but the particle density and the sound velocity are functions of the position . therefore it is not possible to place this experiment on a single point of the phase diagram displayed in fig . . however one can evaluate the ratio @xmath403 at different positions , that is at different @xmath0 . for instance , at the typical value @xmath434 , fig . 2 of reference @xcite allows to calculate the sound velocity as well as the healing length @xmath457 , yielding the typical experimental values @xmath458 and @xmath459 . moreover the ratio between the typical disorder amplitude @xmath460 and the chemical potential @xmath461 is the same in fig . [ fig13 ] and in experiment : @xmath462 ( note however that in the experimental case this is the value of the _ local _ chemical potential that matters ) . hence , although the experimental setup of ref . @xcite forbids a direct comparison with the results of the present work , the estimates of the typical values @xmath458 and @xmath459 indeed locate the experimental system within the regime of anderson localization of fig . [ fig13 ] . once the appropriate regime of parameters for observing anderson localization in a bose condensed beam has been determined , it is also important to identify possible experimental signatures . in our theoretical approach we use the transmission coefficient @xmath214 of the beam over the disordered region as the relevant parameter . however the measure of @xmath214 might be experimentally involved , and we propose here to use an other related quantity , namely the rate of energy dissipation @xcite : @xmath463 where @xmath464 is the drag force exerted by the beam on the obstacle . definition ( [ exp6 ] ) is quite natural : the force exerted on the obstacle is the mean value of the operator @xmath465 over the condensate wave function . it is rigorously justified by the analysis of ref . @xcite in terms of stress tensor . in the stationary case , changing integration from @xmath17 to @xmath86 in ( [ exp6 ] ) , a simple integration by parts yields @xmath466 in the r.h.s . of eq . ( [ exp10 ] ) we made use of relations ( [ e4 ] ) and ( [ t1 ] ) . it has been shown in section [ transmis ] that @xmath81 and that under assumption ( [ t2 ] ) ( small nonlinearity and arbitrary transmission or weak transmission and arbitrary nonlinearity ) one has ( see eqs . ( [ t7 ] ) and ( [ t5 ] ) ) @xmath467 which yields @xmath468 in the regime @xmath469 , using eq . ( [ spt3 ] ) one recovers from ( [ exp11 ] ) the perturbative result already obtained in ref . @xcite : @xmath470 ) is rather simple and it is worth spending some time to discuss it . consider an incident beam of particles with density @xmath471 and momentum @xmath472 moving from @xmath83 towards an obstacle at rest . part of the particles is transmitted ( a fraction @xmath214 ) and the other part is reflected ( a fraction @xmath473 ) . the collisions are elastic and each of the reflected particles experiences an exchange of momentum @xmath474 with the obstacle . during a time @xmath389 there are @xmath475 collisions and by the law of action and reaction the obstacle experiences a force @xmath476 in the r.h.s . of ( [ exp12 ] ) , one has written that @xmath477 is the flux of particles colliding with the obstacle i.e. , @xmath478 . ( [ exp11 ] ) and ( [ exp12 ] ) are identical because what we call @xmath29 is the downstream density of the beam ( cf . [ fig2 ] ) , i.e. , precisely @xmath479 . depending on which quantity is held constant ( @xmath29 as in the present paper , or @xmath471 ) eq . ( [ exp11 ] ) or ( [ exp12 ] ) is more appropriate ( cf . the discussion of the fixed input and fixed output problem in ref . this is somewhat reminiscent of the controversy on the correctness of the landauer formula ( see , e.g. , the discussion in ref . @xcite ) . on the basis of ( [ exp11 ] ) one sees that the measure of @xmath480 gives direct informations on the transmission of the interacting beam through the disordered region , allowing one to reveal in which configuration is the system . for instance in the localized regime the energy dissipation is high ( @xmath481 ) and grows exponentially with the size @xmath0 of the disordered region , whereas in the perturbative regime @xmath480 is much lower and scales as @xmath0 . in the present work we have presented an analysis of the transmission of a weakly interacting bose gas incident on a disordered potential . we have shown on the basis of numerical and analytical results that there is a regime of anderson localization in this system and proposed experimental signature of this phenomenon . in order to properly identify a `` localized regime '' we have studied the transmission coefficient and its probability distribution . the transmission coefficient @xmath214 is well defined under assumption ( [ t2 ] ) , which holds in the following regimes : ( i ) small nonlinearity and arbitrary transmission or ( ii ) weak transmission and arbitrary nonlinearity . in other cases there is no obvious way to define the transmission of the non - linear beam because one can not separate in the up - stream region an incident flow from a reflected one . however , our analysis in terms of @xmath341 and @xmath122 ( defined in sec . [ transmis ] ) is always valid , even when condition ( [ t2 ] ) is not fulfilled . this just means that , out of regime ( [ t2 ] ) , the connection ( [ t7 ] ) between @xmath122 and @xmath214 is invalid . but for instance this does not invalidate at all the analysis leading to the dmpk equation ( [ dmpk ] ) , and the experimental signature proposed in sec . [ signature ] also remains valid even when it is not possible to properly define @xmath214 . we note that the validity of the dmpk approach for non - interacting particles is a well established fact in the theory of disordered systems . what is achieved in the present work is its extension to the case of interacting particles . other studies of anderson localization in the presence of interactions have concentrated on the long time behavior of the time evolution of initial wave packets @xcite . although those results are still a matter of active debate in the community , the results of the present work produce strong evidence of the existence of anderson localization for weakly interacting bose particles ( with effective repulsive interaction ) propagating through disordered samples of finite size @xmath482 . although the present study leads to the important conclusion that anderson localization in the presence of interaction is possible , it is rather disappointing to remark that it can be clearly identified only when @xmath483 , i.e. , in a regime where interactions do not play a major role ( see the discussion of sec . [ apconf ] and also ref . @xcite ) . in this respect , the more interesting and new effect of interactions is the existence of an upper threshold @xmath1 for the length of the disordered region : for @xmath426 no stationary flow is possible . as shown in sec . [ sec - lstar ] , @xmath1 is directly connected to the probability distribution of the parameter @xmath122 and to the localization properties of the system . it would be very interesting to lead a systematic study of the transmission in the interaction - induced time dependent regime ( @xmath426 ) where the numerical results of ref . @xcite indicate a power law decay of the time - averaged transmission , a signature generally considered of loss of phase coherence and onset of ohmic behavior @xcite . work in this direction is in progress . it is a pleasure to thank b. altshuler , a. comtet , j .- l . pichard and c. texier for inspiring discussions . this work was supported by anr grants no . 05nano00802 , no . nt05242103 and no . 08blan016501 , by the ifraf institute and by the alexander von humboldt foundation . we gratefully acknowledge funding by the excellence initiative of the german research foundation ( dfg ) through the heidelberg graduate school of fundamental physics ( grant no gsc 129/1 ) and the global networks mobility measures the frontier innovation fund of the university of heidelberg . we furthermore acknowledge support through the dfg forschergruppe 760 `` scattering systems with complex dynamics '' . we give here a demonstration of the perturbative results ( [ spt4 ] ) , ( [ spt10 ] ) and ( [ spt11 ] ) in the special case of a gaussian disordered potential @xmath153 of type ( [ e2d ] ) . a simple way to obtain this results starts by noticing that any gaussian noise verifying @xmath484 and @xmath485 [ and here we are specifically interested in @xmath147 that appears in eq . ( [ e2d ] ) ] can be written as ( see , e.g. , ref . @xcite ) @xmath486 where @xmath487 s are random positions uniformly distributed on the real axis with density @xmath488 and mean spacing @xmath489 and @xmath490 is a random variable ( with @xmath491 and @xmath492 ) . in order to calculate the probability distribution of the reflection coefficient @xmath473 [ whose value is given by ( [ spt3 ] ) ] one should first consider the distribution of @xmath493 the quantity @xmath494 as given by ( [ a2 ] ) is formally equivalent to the position @xmath495 of a particle performing a random walk in the complex plane after @xmath496 iterations . the particle is initially at the origin and performs jumps of constant amplitude @xmath497 with random direction . denoting by @xmath498 the probability to find the particle in the domain @xmath499 around @xmath495 after @xmath135 steps , if @xmath500 [ which is ensured by taking the limit @xmath501 in ( [ a2 ] ) ] , the central limit theorem yields @xmath502 it is then a simple exercise to get the distribution of @xmath503 . one obtains @xmath504 \ ; , \ ] ] where @xmath505 from relation ( [ spt3 ] ) , eq . ( [ a5 ] ) immediately yields the announced probability distribution ( [ spt4 ] ) with @xmath506 for a potential @xmath153 of type ( [ e2d ] ) , @xmath507 [ see eq . ( [ e2 g ] ) ] and eq . ( [ a6 ] ) demonstrates in this case the validity of eqs . ( [ spt10 ] ) and ( [ spt11 ] ) . in this appendix , we explain how to obtain the dmpk equation ( [ dmpk ] ) starting from the discrete langevin equation ( [ np6 ] ) . let us consider a generic situation where @xmath267 obeys a stochastic recursion relation of the type @xmath508 with uncorrelated random variables @xmath290 : @xmath509 it is clear that under assumption ( [ gnp2bis ] ) , eq . ( [ np6 ] ) is of type ( [ b1 ] ) with all the odd @xmath135 averages in ( [ b2 ] ) being zero and @xmath510 [ cf . ( [ varxi ] ) ] . let @xmath511 be the probability that @xmath267 lies in the interval @xmath122 , @xmath297 . one can express @xmath512 as @xmath513 this yields @xmath514 using the fact that @xmath267 depends on the variables @xmath515 , @xmath516 @xmath517 but not on @xmath290 ( as can be seen directly from ( [ b1 ] ) ) one can write the last of eqs . ( [ b4 ] ) as @xmath518 in the case of eq . ( [ np6 ] ) one has @xmath519 and the successive moments of @xmath520 read @xmath521 @xmath522 with all the other moments being of order @xmath277 or more , i.e. , negligible in regime ( [ np4a ] ) . ( [ b5 ] ) thus reads @xmath523 = \nonumber \\ & & \nonumber \\ & & \displaystyle -\frac{\partial}{\partial\lambda}\left[(1 + 2\lambda)p\right ] + \frac{\partial^2}{\partial\lambda^2}\left[(\lambda^2+\lambda)p\right ] = \nonumber \\ & & \nonumber \\ & & \displaystyle \frac{\partial}{\partial\lambda } \left[\lambda(\lambda+1)\frac{\partial p}{\partial\lambda}\right ] \ ; .\end{aligned}\ ] ] in the continuous limit , defining @xmath524 , the l.h.s . of eq . ( [ b8 ] ) is simply the first derivative of @xmath525 with respect to @xmath26 and ( [ b8 ] ) reduces to eq . ( [ dmpk ] ) of the main text . 99 p. w. anderson , phys . rev . * 109 * , 1492 ( 1958 ) . et al . _ , nature * 453 * , 891 ( 2008 ) . et al . _ , nature * 453 * , 895 ( 2008 ) . k. huang and h. f. meng , phys . lett . * 69 * , 644 ( 1992 ) . s. giorgini , l. pitaevskii , and s. stringari , phys . b * 49 * , 12938 ( 1994 ) . g. e. astrakharchik , j. boronat , j. casulleras , and s. giorgini , phys . a * 66 * , 023603 ( 2002 ) . d. clment , ph . bouyer , a. aspect , and l. sanchez - palencia , phys . a * 77 * , 033631 ( 2008 ) . yong p. chen . _ et al . _ , a * 77 * , 033632 ( 2008 ) . t. giamarchi and h. j. schulz , phys . b * 37 * , 325 ( 1988 ) . m. p. a. fisher , p. b. weichman , g. grinstein , and d. s. fisher , phys . rev . b * 40 * , 546 ( 1989 ) . s. a. gredeskul and y. s. kivshar , phys . rep . * 216 * , 1 ( 1992 ) . n. bilas and n. pavloff , phys . lett . * 95 * , 130403 ( 2005 ) . t. paul , p. leboeuf , n. pavloff , k. richter , and p. schlagheck , phys . rev . a * 72 * , 063621 ( 2005 ) . t. paul , p. schlagheck , p. leboeuf and n. pavloff , phys . * 98 * , 210602 ( 2007 ) . c. menotti and s. stringari , phys . a * 66 * , 043610 ( 2002 ) . d. s. petrov , g. v. shlyapnikov , and j. t. m. walraven , phys . * 85 * , 3745 ( 2000 ) . c. raman _ et al . _ , phys . rev . lett . * 83 * , 2502 ( 1999 ) . _ et al._. phys . lett . * 85 * , 2228 ( 2000 ) . p. engels and c. atherton , phys . lett . * 99 * , 160405 ( 2007 ) . m. olshanii , phys . lett . * 81 * , 938 ( 1998 ) . a. d. jackson , g. m. kavoulakis , and c. j. pethick , phys . a * 58 * , 2417 ( 1998 ) . p. leboeuf and n. pavloff , phys . a * 64 * , 033602 ( 2001 ) . l. p. pitaevskii and s. stringari , j. low temp . physics * 85 * , 377 ( 1991 ) . m. schwartz , phys . b * 15 * , 1399 ( 1977 ) . d. s. petrov , ph.d . thesis , university of amsterdam , 2003 , available online at http://www-old.amolf.nl/publications/theses/petrow . a. v. lopatin and v. m. vinokur , phys . lett . * 88 * , 235503 ( 2002 ) . g. e. astrakharchik and l. p. pitaevskii , phys . a * 70 * , 013608 ( 2004 ) . t. ernst , t. paul , and p. schlagheck , arxiv:0905.4750 ( submitted to phys . a ) . v. hakim , phys . e * 55 * , 2835 ( 1997 ) . h. lamb , _ hydrodynamics _ , ( cambridge university press , cambridge , 1997 ) . p. leboeuf , n. pavloff , and s. sinha , phys . a * 68 * , 063608 ( 2003 ) . t. paul , m. hartung , k. richter , and p. schlagheck , phys . a * 76 * , 063605 ( 2007 ) . b. i. ivlev and n. b. kopnin , adv 33 * , 47 ( 1984 ) . j. s. langer and v. ambegaokar , phys . rev . * 164 * , 498 ( 1967 ) . note in particular that condition ( [ t2 ] ) is always fulfilled in absence of interaction since in this case the speed of sound is @xmath526 . b. i. shklovskii and a. l. efros , _ electronic properties of doped semiconductors _ , ( springer - verlag , 1984 ) . j. fortgh and c. zimmermann , rev . phys . * 79 * , 235 ( 2007 ) . s. kraft , a. gnther , h. ott , d. wharam , c. zimmermann , and j. fortgh , j. phys . b * 35 * , l469 ( 2002 ) . j. estve _ et al . a * 70 * , 043629 ( 2004 ) ; t. schumm _ et al . _ j. d * 32 * , 171 ( 2005 ) . wang , m. d. lukin , and e. demler , phys . rev . lett . * 92 * , 076802 ( 2004 ) . j w goodman , _ speckle phenomena in optics : theory and applications _ , roberts and compagny publishers ( greenwood village , 2007 ) . d. clment _ et al . _ , new j. phys . * 8 * , 165 ( 2006 ) . l. fallani , c. fort , and m. inguscio , adv . at . . phys . * 56 * , 119 ( 2008 ) . ( [ e2l ] ) corresponds to a typical physical situation where the potential seen by the particles is proportional to the intensity of an electric field whose components are random gaussian variables . in ref . @xcite this region has been improperly called `` ohmic '' . t. n. antsygina , l. a. pastur and v. a. slyusarev , sov . j. low temp . phys . * 7 * , 1 ( 1981 ) [ fiz . nizk . temp . * 7 * , 5 ( 1981 ) ] . i. m. lifshits , s. a. gredeskul , and l. a. pastur , _ introduction to the theory of disordered systems _ , john wiley ( new - york 1988 ) . o. n. dorokhov , jetp lett . * 36 * , 318 ( 1982 ) [ pisma zh . fiz . * 36 * , 259 ( 1982 ) ] ; p. a. mello , p. pereyra , and n. kumar , ann . ( n.y . ) * 181 * , 290 ( 1988 ) . v. i. melnikov , sov . solid state * 23 * , 444 ( 1981 ) [ fis . tela ( leningrad ) * 23 * , 782 ( 1981 ) ] . c. w. j. beenakker , rev . * 69 * , 731 ( 1997 ) . p. a. mello , j. math . phys . * 27 * , 2876 ( 1986 ) . c. w. j. beenakker and j. a. melsen , phys . b * 50 * , 2450 ( 1994 ) . in order to complete the proof of this equivalence one has to show that the mean value @xmath527 obtained from ( [ dmpk0 ] ) for a sample of length @xmath528 is identical to the result ( [ spt5 ] ) . this amounts to show that for a potential of the form ( [ e2a ] ) one has @xmath529 , which is easily obtained . a. a. abrikosov , solid state comm . * 37 * , 997 ( 1981 ) . b. a. van tiggelen in _ diffusive waves in complex media _ , j. p. fouque ed . , p. 1 ( kluwer academic publishers , dordrecht , 1999 ) . note that in ref . @xcite the theoretical determination of @xmath1 was obtained using a criterion different from ( [ tstar ] ) resulting in a less precise estimate at high @xmath403 . f. m. izrailev and a. a. krokhin , phys . lett . * 82 * , 4062 ( 1999 ) . l. sanchez - palencia _ et al . _ , phys . rev . lett . * 98 * , 210401 ( 2007 ) . l. tessieri , j. phys . a * 35 * , 9585 ( 2002 ) . e. gurevich and o. kenneth , phys . a * 79 * , 063617 ( 2009 ) . a * 80 * , 023605 ( 2009 ) . a. f. ioffe and a. r. regel , prog . semicond . * 4 * , 237 ( 1960 ) . note that the value @xmath530 does not depend on the type of correlation of the disordered potential considered since it is simply the value of @xmath403 for which eq . ( [ tstar - impl ] ) admits the solution @xmath531 . w. gurin _ et al . _ , lett . * 97 * , 200402 ( 2006 ) . n. pavloff , phys . a * 66 * , 013610 ( 2002 ) . note that there is a factor of 2 difference between the present definition ( [ pt4 ] ) of @xmath193 and the one used in ref . y. imry , _ introduction to mesoscopic physics _ , oxford university press ( oxford , 1997 ) . d. l. shepelyansky , phys . lett . * 70 * , 1787 ( 1993 ) ; g. kopidakis , s. komineas , s. flach , and s. aubry , phys . lett . * 100 * 084103 ( 2008 ) ; a. s. pikovsky and d. l. shepelyansky , phys . lett . * 100 * , 094101 ( 2008 ) ; s. fishman , a. iomin , and k. mallick phys . e * 78 * , 066605 ( 2008 ) . s. datta , _ electronic transport in mesoscopic systems _ ( cambridge university press , 1995 ) . m. v. berry and s. klein , eur . * 18 * , 222 ( 1997 ) . c. texier , ph.d . thesis , universit paris 6 , 1999 , available online at http://www.lptms.u-psud.fr/membres/texier/research.html Abstract:

Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.

Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered . Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video . Paper: there is a vast literature on epidemics on complex networks ( see @xcite for a review ) . most of the epidemic models consider a transmission mechanism which is independent of the local condition faced by the agents concerned . however , if there is a factor of coordination or persuasion involved , relative considerations tend to be important in understanding whether some new belief or behavior is adopted @xcite . to fix ideas , it may be useful to think of the diffusion process as modeling the adoption of a new technology . in this case , when an agent is confronted with the possibility of adoption , her decision depends on the persuasion effort exerted on her by each of her neighbors in the social network . more formally , those neighborhood effects can be captured as follows : the probability that an agent adopts the new technology when @xmath0 out of her @xmath1 neighbors have already adopted can be modeled by a threshold function : this probability is one if @xmath2 and it is zero otherwise . for @xmath3 , this would correspond to a local majority rule . more generally , some simple models for the diffusion of a new behavior have been proposed in term of a basic underlying model of individual decision - making : as individuals make decisions based on the choices of their neighbors , a particular pattern of behavior can begin to spread across the links of the network @xcite , @xcite . in this work , we analyze the diffusion in the large population limit when the underlying graph is a random network with given vertex degrees . there is now a large literature on the study of complex networks across different disciplines such as physics @xcite , mathematics @xcite , sociology @xcite , networking @xcite or economics @xcite . there is also a large literature on local interaction and adoption externalities @xcite , @xcite , @xcite , @xcite . similarly to these works , we study a game where players payoffs depend on the actions taken by their neighbors in the network but not on the specific identities of these neighbors . our most general framework ( presented in section [ sec : mod ] ) allows to deal with threshold games of complements , i.e. a player has an increasing incentive to take an action as more neighbors take the action . the main contribution of our paper is a model which allows us to study rigorously semi - anonymous threshold games of complements with local interactions on a complex network . we use a very simple dynamics for the evolution of the play : each time , agents choose the strategy with best payoff , given the current behavior of their neighbors . stochastic versions of best response dynamics have been studied extensively as a simple model for the emergence of conventions @xcite , @xcite . a key finding in this line of work is that local interaction may drive the system towards a particular equilibrium in which all players take the same action . most of the literature following @xcite , @xcite is concerned with stochastic versions of best response dynamics on fixed networks and a simple condition known as risk dominance @xcite determines whether an innovation introduced in the network will eventually become widespread . in this case , bounds on the convergence time have been computed @xcite , @xcite as a function of the structure of the interaction network . in this paper , we focus on properties of deterministic ( myopic ) best response dynamics . in such a framework , as shown in @xcite , coordination on the risk dominant strategy depends on the network structure , the dynamics of the game and the initial configuration . in particular , this coordination might fail and equilibria with co - existent strategies can exist . this was shown in @xcite already in the simple case where the underlying network is the two - dimensional lattice . while the results in @xcite depend very much on the details of the particular graph considered , @xcite derives general results that depend on local properties of the graphs . more formally , agents are nodes of a fixed infinite graph and revise their strategies synchronously . there is an edge @xmath4 if agents @xmath5 and @xmath6 can interact with each other . each node has a choice between two possible behaviors labeled @xmath7 and @xmath8 . on each edge @xmath4 , there is an incentive for @xmath5 and @xmath6 to have their behaviors match , which is modeled as the following coordination game parametrized by a real number @xmath9 : if @xmath5 and @xmath6 choose @xmath7 ( resp . @xmath8 ) , they each receive a payoff of @xmath10 ( resp . @xmath11 ) ; if they choose opposite strategies , then they receive a payoff of @xmath12 . then the total payoff of a player is the sum of the payoffs with each of her neighbors . if the degree of node @xmath5 is @xmath13 and @xmath14 is her number of neighbors playing @xmath8 , then the payoff to @xmath5 from choosing @xmath7 is @xmath15 while the payoff from choosing @xmath8 is @xmath16 . hence the best response strategy for agent @xmath5 is to adopt @xmath8 if @xmath17 and @xmath7 if @xmath18 . a number of qualitative insights can be derived from this simple diffusion model @xcite . clearly , a network where all nodes play @xmath7 is an equilibrium of the game as is the state where all nodes play @xmath8 . consider now a network where all nodes initially play @xmath7 and a small number of nodes are forced to adopt strategy @xmath8 ( constituting the seed ) . other nodes in the network apply best - response updates , then these nodes will be repeatedly applying the following rule : switch to @xmath8 if enough of your neighbors have already adopted @xmath8 . there can be a cascading sequence of nodes switching to @xmath8 such that a network - wide equilibrium is reached in the limit . in particular , contagion is said to occur if action @xmath8 can spread from a finite set of players to the whole population . it is shown in @xcite that there is a contagion threshold such that contagion occurs if and only if the parameter @xmath10 is less than the contagion threshold . in particular the contagion threshold is always at most @xmath19 so that @xmath8 needs to be the risk - dominant action in order to spread . however this condition is not sufficient and @xcite gives a number of characterizations of the contagion threshold and also shows that low contagion threshold implies the existence of equilibria where both actions are played . most of the results on this model are restricted to deterministic infinite graphs and the results in @xcite depend on local properties of graphs that need to be checked node - by - node . in networks exhibiting heterogeneity among the nodes , this approach will be limited in its application . in this work , we analyze the diffusion in the large population limit when the underlying graph is a random network @xmath20 with @xmath21 vertices and where @xmath22 is a given degree sequence ( see section [ sec : conf ] for a detailed definition ) . although random graphs are not considered to be highly realistic models of most real - world networks , they are often used as first approximation and are a natural first choice for a sparse interaction network in the absence of any known geometry of the problem @xcite . our analysis yields several insights into how the diffusion propagates and we believe that they could be used in real - world situations . as an example , we show some implications of our results for the design of optimal advertising strategies . our results extend the previous analysis of global cascades made in @xcite using a threshold model . they differ greatly from the study of standard epidemics models used for the analysis of the spread of viruses @xcite where an entity begin as susceptible and may become infected and infectious through contacts with her neighbors with a given probability . already in the simple coordination game presented above , we show that connectivity ( i.e. the average number of neighbors of a typical agent ) plays an ambiguous role : while it allows the diffusion to spread , when the network is highly connected , the diffusion is also limited by high - degree nodes , which are very stable . these nodes require a lot of their neighbors to switch to @xmath8 in order to play @xmath8 themselves . in the case of a sparse random network of interacting agents , we compute the contagion threshold in section [ sec : cont ] and relate it to the important notion of _ pivotal players_. we also show the existence of ( continuous and discontinuous ) phase transitions . in section [ sec : eq ] , we analyze the possible equilibria of the game for low values of @xmath10 . in particular , we give conditions under which an equilibrium with coexistence of large ( i.e. containing a positive fraction of the total population ) connected sets of players @xmath7 and @xmath8 is possible . in section [ sec : ad ] , we also compute the minimal size of a seed of new adopters in order to trigger a global cascade in the case where these adopters can only be sampled without any information on the graph . we show that this minimal size has a non - trivial behavior as a function of the connectivity . in section [ sec : lmf ] , we give a heuristic argument allowing to recover the technical results which gives some intuition behind our formulas . our results also explain why social networks can display a great stability in the presence of continual small shocks that are as large as the shocks that ultimately generate a global cascade . cascades can therefore be regarded as a specific manifestation of the robust yet fragile nature of many complex systems @xcite : a system may appear stable for long periods of time and withstand many external shocks ( robustness ) , then suddenly and apparently inexplicably exhibit a large scale cascade ( fragility ) . our paper is divided into two parts . the first part is contained in the next section . we apply our technical results to the particular case of the coordination game presented above . we describe our main findings and provide heuristics and intuitions for them . these results are direct consequences of our main theorems stated and proved in the second part of the paper . this second part starts with section [ sec : mod ] , where we present in details our most general model of diffusion ( where initial activation and thresholds can vary among the population and also be random ) . this general model allows to recover and extend results in the random graphs literature and is used in @xcite for the analysis of the impact of clustering . we also state our main technical results : theorem [ th : epi ] and theorem [ prop : cascade ] . their proofs can be found in sections [ sec : thepi ] and [ sec : casc ] respectively . section [ sec : conc ] contains our concluding remarks . * probability asymptotics : * in this paper , we consider sequences of ( random ) graphs and asymptotics as the number of vertices @xmath21 tends to infinity . for notational simplicity we will usually not show the dependency on @xmath21 explicitly . all unspecified limits and other asymptotics statement are for @xmath23 . for example , w.h.p . ( with high probability ) means with probability tending to 1 as @xmath24 and @xmath25 means convergence in probability as @xmath26 . similarly , we use @xmath27 , @xmath28 and @xmath29 in a standard way , see @xcite . for example , if @xmath30 is a parameter of the random graph , @xmath31 means that @xmath32 as @xmath23 for every @xmath33 , equivalently @xmath34 , or for every @xmath33 , @xmath35 w.h.p . in this section , we first present the model for the underlying graph . this is the only part of this section required to understand our main technical results in section [ sec : mod ] . the remaining parts of this section present and discuss applications and special cases exploring the significance of the technical results derived in the sequel . we consider a set @xmath36=\{1,\dots , n\}$ ] of agents interacting over a social network . let @xmath37 be a sequence of non - negative integers such that @xmath38 is even . for notational simplicity we will usually not show the dependency on @xmath21 explicitly . this sequence is the degree sequence of the graph : agent @xmath39 $ ] has degree @xmath13 , i.e. has @xmath13 neighbors . we define a random multigraph ( allowing for self - loop and multiple links ) with given degree sequence @xmath40 , denoted by @xmath41 by the configuration model @xcite : take a set of @xmath13 half - edges for each vertex @xmath5 and combine the half - edges into pairs by a uniformly random matching of the set of all half - edges . conditioned on the multigraph @xmath41 being a simple graph , we obtain a uniformly distributed random graph with the given degree sequence , which we denote by @xmath42 @xcite . we will let @xmath23 and assume that we are given @xmath43 satisfying the following regularity conditions , see @xcite : [ cond ] for each @xmath21 , @xmath44 is a sequence of non - negative integers such that @xmath38 is even and , for some probability distribution @xmath45 independent of @xmath21 , * @xmath46 for every @xmath47 as @xmath48 ; * @xmath49 ; * @xmath50 } d_i^2=o(n)$ ] . in words , we assume that the empirical distribution of the degree sequence converges to a fixed probability distribution @xmath51 with a finite mean @xmath52 . condition [ cond ] ( iii ) ensures that @xmath51 has a finite second moment and is technically required . it implies that the empirical mean of the degrees converges to @xmath52 . in some cases , we will need the following additional condition which implies that the asymptotic distribution of the degrees @xmath51 has a finite third moment : [ cond2 ] for each @xmath21 , @xmath44 is a sequence of non - negative integers such that @xmath50 } d_i^3=o(n)$ ] . the results of this work can be applied to some other random graphs models too by conditioning on the vertex degrees ( see @xcite ) . for example , for the erds - rnyi graph @xmath53 with @xmath54 , our results will hold with the limiting probability distribution @xmath51 being a poisson distribution with mean @xmath52 . an interesting perspective is to understand how different network structures are more or less hospitable to cascades . going back to the diffusion model described in the introduction , we see that the lower @xmath10 is , the easiest the diffusion spreads . in @xcite , the contagion threshold of a connected infinite network ( called the cascade capacity in @xcite ) is defined as the maximum threshold @xmath55 at which a finite set of initial adopters can cause a complete cascade , i.e. the resulting cascade of adoptions of @xmath8 eventually causes every node to switch from @xmath7 to @xmath8 . there are two possible models to consider depending whether the initial adopters changing from @xmath7 to @xmath8 apply or not best - response update . it is shown in @xcite that the same contagion threshold arises in both models . in this section , we consider a model where the initial adopters are forced to play @xmath8 forever . in this case , the diffusion is monotone and the number of nodes playing @xmath8 is non - decreasing . we say that this case corresponds to the _ permanent adoption model _ : a player playing @xmath8 will never play @xmath7 again . we will discuss a model where the initial adopters also apply best - response update in section [ sec : eq ] . to illustrate the notion of contagion threshold , consider the infinite network depicted on figure [ fig : counter34 ] . it is easy to see that the contagion threshold for such a network is @xmath56 , the same as for the @xmath57-dimensional lattice . note that in the network of figure [ fig : counter34 ] the density of nodes with degree @xmath58 is @xmath59 and the density of nodes of degree @xmath60 is @xmath61 , whereas in the @xmath57-dimensional lattice , all vertices have degree @xmath60 . we will see in the sequel that the sequence of random graphs @xmath20 with asymptotic degree distribution such that @xmath62 and @xmath63 has a contagion threshold of @xmath64.to be done and with density of nodes with degree @xmath58 equals to @xmath59 and degree @xmath60 equals to @xmath61.,width=188 ] we now compute the contagion threshold for a sequence of random networks . since a random network is finite and not necessarily connected , we first need to adapt the definition of contagion threshold to our context . we start by recalling a basic result on the size of the largest component of a random graph with a given degree sequence @xcite , namely a sufficient condition for the existence of a _ giant component_. consider the random graph @xmath20 satisfying conditions [ cond ] with asymptotic degree distribution @xmath45 . if @xmath65 then the size of the largest component of @xmath20 is @xmath66 . in this case , we say that there exists a _ giant component_. for a graph @xmath67 and a parameter @xmath10 , we consider the largest connected component of the induced subgraph in which we keep only vertices of degree strictly less than @xmath68 . we call the vertices in this component _ pivotal players _ : if only one pivotal player switches from @xmath7 to @xmath8 then the whole set of pivotal players will eventually switch to @xmath8 in the permanent adoption model . for a player @xmath69 , we denote by @xmath70 the final number of players @xmath8 in the permanent adoption model with parameter @xmath10 , when the initial state consists of only @xmath71 playing @xmath8 , all other players playing @xmath7 . informally , we say that @xmath70 is the size of the cascade induced by player @xmath71 . [ prop : cap ] consider the random graph @xmath20 satisfying conditions [ cond ] and [ cond2 ] with asymptotic degree distribution @xmath45 such that @xmath72 . we define @xmath55 by : @xmath73 let @xmath74 be the set of pivotal players in @xmath20 . * for @xmath75 , there are constants @xmath76 such that w.h.p . @xmath77 and for any @xmath78 , @xmath79 . * for @xmath80 , for an uniformly chosen player @xmath71 , we have @xmath81 . the same result holds if @xmath82 players are chosen uniformly at random . note that proposition [ prop : cap ] is valid only for graphs with a giant component ( for graphs with all components @xmath83 , we have trivially that @xmath81 for all values of @xmath10 ) . we can rewrite ( [ eq : cap ] ) as follows : let @xmath84 be a random variable with distribution @xmath51 , i.e. @xmath85 , then @xmath86>{{\mathbb{e}}}[d]\right\}.\end{aligned}\ ] ] we can restate proposition [ prop : cap ] as follows : let @xmath87 be the size of a cascade induced by switching a random player from @xmath7 to @xmath8 . proposition [ prop : cap ] implies that for @xmath80 , we have @xmath88 as @xmath23 for every @xmath33 , whereas for @xmath75 there exists constants @xmath89 depending only on @xmath10 and the parameters of the graph such that for every @xmath33 , @xmath90 . informally , we will say that global cascades ( i.e. reaching a positive fraction of the population ) occur when @xmath75 and do not occur when @xmath80 . we call @xmath55 defined by ( [ eq : cap ] ) the contagion threshold for the sequence of random networks with degree distribution @xmath91 . this result is in accordance with the heuristic result of @xcite ( see in particular the cascade condition eq . 5 in @xcite ) . proposition [ prop : cap ] follows from theorem [ prop : cascade ] below which also gives estimates for the parameters @xmath92 and @xmath93 when @xmath75 . under additional technical conditions , theorem [ prop : cascade ] shows that @xmath94 in case ( i ) . note that the condition @xmath95 implies that @xmath96 so that for @xmath97 , we have , @xmath98 . hence we have the following elementary corollary : [ cor1/3 ] for any random graph @xmath20 satisfying conditions [ cond ] and [ cond2 ] with asymptotic degree distribution @xmath45 such that @xmath72 , we have @xmath99 . recall that for general graphs , it is shown in @xcite that @xmath100 . note also that our bound in corollary [ cor1/3 ] is tight : for a @xmath0-regular network with @xmath101 chosen uniformly at random ( i.e. @xmath20 such that @xmath102 for all @xmath39 $ ] ) , proposition [ prop : cap ] implies that @xmath103 corresponding to the contagion threshold of a @xmath0-regular tree , see @xcite . for @xmath101 , a @xmath0-regular random graph is connected w.h.p , so that for any @xmath104 , an initial adopter will cause a complete cascade ( i.e. reaching all players ) . in particular , in this case , the only possible equilibria of the game are all players playing @xmath7 or all players playing @xmath8 . we will come back to the analysis of equilibria of the game in section [ sec : eq ] . given a degree distribution @xmath51 , proposition [ prop : cap ] gives the typical value of @xmath105 under the uniform distribution on graphs with the prescribed degree distribution . a question of interest is to find among all graphs with a given degree sequence , which ones achieve the lowest or highest value of the contagion threshold . indeed , the contagion threshold of a graph can be seen as a proxy for its susceptibility to cascades : the higher the contagion threshold is , the more susceptible the graph is to cascading behavior . clearly if @xmath106 is the maximal degree in the graph , we have @xmath107 . in the case of regular graphs , we saw that the typical contagion threshold is equal to this lower bound : @xmath108 . note however that there are examples of regular graphs in @xcite with a strictly higher threshold ( see figure 3 there : a @xmath109-regular graph with contagion threshold @xmath110 ) . hence among all @xmath0-regular graphs , picking a graph at random will give w.h.p . a graph which is the least susceptible to cascades among those @xmath0-regular graphs . however it is not always the case that picking a graph at random among all graphs with a given degree sequence will result in the least susceptible one . there are situations where the typical value of the contagion threshold exceeds the lowest possible value : this is the case in the example presented above in figure [ fig : counter34 ] for which the contagion threshold is @xmath111 whereas the sequence of random graphs @xmath20 with asymptotic degree distribution such that @xmath62 and @xmath63 has a contagion threshold of @xmath64 . the recent work @xcite has a similar focus . for erds - rnyi random graphs and for power law graphs ( dashed curve ) as a function of the average degree @xmath52 . right : @xmath112 for erds - rnyi random graphs as a function of @xmath52 in the range @xmath113$].,title="fig:",width=188 ] for erds - rnyi random graphs and for power law graphs ( dashed curve ) as a function of the average degree @xmath52 . right : @xmath112 for erds - rnyi random graphs as a function of @xmath52 in the range @xmath113$].,title="fig:",width=151 ] we now consider some examples . first the case of erds - rnyi random graphs @xmath53 where each of the @xmath114 edges is present with probability @xmath115 for a fixed parameter @xmath52 . in this case , we can apply our results with @xmath116 for all @xmath47 , i.e. the poisson distribution with mean @xmath52 . as shown in figure [ fig : qc ] ( left ) for the case of erds - rnyi random graphs @xmath53 , @xmath55 is well below @xmath117 , indeed we have @xmath118 for any value of @xmath52 . as shown in figure [ fig : qc ] ( right ) , we see that @xmath55 is a non - decreasing function of @xmath52 the average degree in the graph for @xmath119 . clearly on figure [ fig : qc ] ( left ) , @xmath55 is a non - increasing function of @xmath52 , for @xmath120 . the second curve in figure [ fig : qc ] corresponds to the contagion threshold for a scale - free random network whose degree distribution @xmath121 ( with @xmath122 ) is parametrized by the decay parameter @xmath123 . we see that in this case we have @xmath124 . in other words , in an erds - rnyi random graph , in order to have a global cascade , the parameter @xmath10 must be such that any node with no more than four neighbors must be able to adopt @xmath8 even if it has a single adopting neighbor . in the case of the scale free random network considered , the parameter @xmath10 must be much lower and any node with no more than nine neighbors must be able to adopt @xmath8 with a single adopting neighbor . this simply reflects the intuitive idea that for widespread diffusion to occur there must be a sufficient high frequency of nodes that are certain to propagate the adoption . we also observe that in both cases , for @xmath10 sufficiently low , there are two critical values for the parameter @xmath52 , @xmath125 such that a global cascade for a fixed @xmath10 is only possible for @xmath126 . the heuristic reason for these two thresholds is that a cascade can be prematurely stopped at high - degree nodes . for erds - rnyi random graphs , when @xmath127 , there exists a giant component , i.e. a connected component containing a positive fraction of the nodes . the high - degree nodes are quite infrequent so that the diffusion should spread easily . however , for @xmath52 close to one , the diffusion does not branch much and progresses along a very thin tree , `` almost a line '' , so that its progression is stopped as soon as it encounters a high - degree node . due to the variability of the poisson distribution , this happens before the diffusion becomes too big for @xmath128 . nevertheless the condition @xmath129 is not sufficient for a global cascade . global diffusion also requires that the network not be too highly connected . this is reflected by the existence of the second threshold @xmath130 where a further transition occurs , now in the opposite direction . for @xmath131 , the diffusion will not reach a positive fraction of the population . the intuition here is clear : the frequency of high - degree nodes is so large that diffusion can not avoid them and typically stops there since it is unlikely that a high enough fraction of their many neighbors eventually adopts . following @xcite , we say that these nodes are locally stable . of the cascade ( in percent of the total population ) for erds - rnyi random graphs as a function of @xmath52 the average degree for a fixed @xmath132 . the lower curve gives the asymptotic fraction of pivotal players @xmath133.,width=170 ] the proof of our theorem [ prop : cascade ] makes previous intuition rigorous for a more general model of diffusion and gives also more insights on the nature of the phase transitions . we describe it now . the lower curve in figure [ fig : cascade ] represents the number of pivotal players in an erds - rnyi random graph as a function of @xmath52 the average connectivity for @xmath134 : hence we keep only the largest connected component of an erds - rnyi random graph where we removed all vertices of degree greater than @xmath135 . by the same heuristic argument as above , we expect two phase transitions for the size of the set of pivotal players . in the proof of theorem [ prop : cascade ] , we show that it is indeed the case and moreover that the phase transitions occur at the same values @xmath136 and @xmath130 as can be seen on figure [ fig : cascade ] where the normalized size ( i.e. fraction ) @xmath133 of the set of pivotal players is positive only for @xmath137 . hence a cascade is possible if and only if there is a giant component of pivotal players . note also that both phase transitions for the pivotal players are continuous , in the sense that the function @xmath138 is continuous . this is not the case for the second phase transition for the normalized size of the cascade given by @xmath139 in proposition [ prop : cap ] : the function @xmath140 is continuous in @xmath136 but not in @xmath130 as depicted on figure [ fig : cascade ] . this has important consequences : around @xmath136 the propagation of cascades is limited by the connectivity of the network as in standard epidemic models . but around @xmath130 , the propagation of cascades is not limited by the connectivity but by the high - degree nodes which are locally stable . of the cascade ( in percent of the total population ) for erds - rnyi random graphs as a function of the frequency of the cascade.,width=170 ] to better understand this second phase transition , consider a dynamical model where at each step a player is chosen at random and switches to @xmath8 . once the corresponding cascade is triggered , we come back to the initial state where every node play @xmath7 before going to the next step . then for @xmath52 less than but very close to @xmath130 , most cascades die out before spreading very far . however , a set of pivotal players still exists , so very rarely a cascade will be triggered by such a player in which case the high connectivity of the network ensures that it will be extremely large . as @xmath52 approaches @xmath130 from below , global cascades become larger but increasingly rare until they disappear implying a discontinuous phase transition . for low values of @xmath52 , the cascades are infrequent and small . as @xmath52 increases , their frequencies and sizes also increase until a point where the cascade reaches almost all vertices of the giant component of the graph . then as @xmath52 increases , their sizes remain almost constant but their frequencies are decreasing . we considered so far the permanent adoption model : the only possible transitions are from playing @xmath7 to @xmath8 . there is another possible model in which the initial adopters playing @xmath8 also apply best - response update . we call this model the _ non - monotonic _ model ( by opposition to the permanent adoption model ) . in this model , if the dynamic converges , the final state will be an equilibrium of the game . an equilibrium of the game is a fixed point of the best response dynamics . for example , the states in which all players play @xmath7 or all players play @xmath8 are trivial equilibria of the game . note that the permanent adoption model does not necessarily yield to an equilibrium of the game as the initial seed does not apply best response dynamics . to illustrate the differences between the two models consider the graph of figure [ fig : contrex ] for a value of @xmath141 : if the circled player switches to @xmath8 , the whole network will eventually switch to @xmath8 in the permanent adoption model , whereas the dynamic for the non - monotonic model will oscillate between the state where only the circled player plays @xmath8 and the state where only his two neighbors of degree two play @xmath8 ( agents still revise their strategies synchronously ) . ( each triangle represents a long line of players).,width=75 ] clearly if a player induces a global cascade for the non - monotonic model , it will also induce a global cascade in the permanent adoption model . as illustrated by the case of figure [ fig : contrex ] , the converse is not true in general . hence , a priori , a pivotal player as defined in previous section might not induce a global cascade in the non - monotonic model . in @xcite , it is shown that if one can find a finite set of initial adopters causing a complete cascade for the permanent adoption model , it is also possible to find another , possibly larger but still finite , set of initial adopters leading to a complete cascade for the non - monotonic model . hence the contagion threshold as defined in @xcite for infinite graphs is the same for both models . in our case , we see that if we switch from @xmath7 to @xmath8 two pivotal players who are neighbors , then the whole set of pivotal players will eventually switch to @xmath8 in the non - monotonic model . hence in our analysis on random networks , we also say that the contagion threshold is the same in both models . moreover , both models will have exactly the same dynamics if started with the set of pivotal players playing @xmath8 and all other players playing @xmath7 . in particular , it shows that the dynamic converges and reaches an equilibrium of the game . hence we have the following corollary : [ prop : equil ] consider the random graph @xmath20 satisfying conditions [ cond ] and [ cond2 ] with asymptotic degree distribution @xmath45 . for @xmath75 , there exists w.h.p . an equilibrium of the game in which the number of players @xmath8 is more than @xmath142 ( defined in proposition [ prop : cap ] ) and it can be obtained from the trivial equilibrium with all players playing @xmath7 by switching only two neighboring pivotal players . hence for @xmath75 , the trivial equilibrium all @xmath7 , is rather weak since two pivotal players can induce a global cascade and there are @xmath66 such players so that switching two neighbors at random will after a finite number of trials ( i.e. not increasing with @xmath21 ) induce such a global cascade . we call this equilibrium the pivotal equilibrium . figure [ fig : mgeo ] shows the average number of trials required . it goes to infinity at both extremes @xmath136 and @xmath130 . moreover , we see that for most values of @xmath52 inside this interval , the average number of trials is less than @xmath57 . if @xmath80 , then by definition if there are pivotal players , their number must be @xmath83 . indeed , in the case of @xmath0-regular graphs , there are no pivotal players for @xmath143 . hence , it is either impossible or very difficult ( by sampling ) to find a set of players with cardinality bounded in @xmath21 leading to a global cascade since in all cases , their number is @xmath83 . as a function of @xmath52.,width=188 ] we now show that equilibria with _ co - existent _ strategies exist . here by co - existent , we mean that a connected fraction of players @xmath7 and @xmath8 are present in the equilibrium . more formally , we call a _ giant component _ : a subset of vertices containing a positive fraction ( as @xmath21 tends to infinity ) of the total size of the graph such that the corresponding induced graph is connected . we ask if there exists equilibrium with a giant component of players @xmath7 and @xmath8 ? in the case @xmath75 , for values of @xmath52 close to @xmath130 , the global cascade reaches almost all nodes of the giant component leaving only very small of connected component of players @xmath7 . however for @xmath52 close to @xmath136 , this is not the case and co - existence is possible as shown by the following proposition : [ prop : inactiveer ] in an erds - rnyi random graph @xmath53 , for @xmath75 , there exists @xmath144 $ ] such that : * for @xmath145 , in the pivotal equilibrium , there is coexistence of a giant component of players @xmath7 and a giant component of players @xmath8 . * for @xmath146 , in the pivotal equilibrium , there is no giant component of players @xmath7 , although there might be a positive fraction of players @xmath7 . . the lower ( green ) curve is the fraction of players @xmath8 in the pivotal equilibrium as a function of @xmath52 ( for @xmath147 ) . the last ( brown ) curve is the size of the giant component of players @xmath7 in the pivotal equilibrium as a function of @xmath52.,width=188 ] figure [ fig : inactive ] illustrates this proposition in the case of erds - rnyi random graphs @xmath53 . the difference between the upper ( red ) and lower ( green ) curve is exactly the fractions of players @xmath7 in the pivotal equilibrium while the brown curve represent the size ( in percentage of the total population ) of the largest connected component of players @xmath7 in the pivotal equilibrium . this curve reaches zero exactly at @xmath148 . hence for @xmath146 , we see that there is still a positive fraction of the population playing @xmath7 , but the set of players @xmath7 is divided in small ( i.e. of size @xmath82 ) connected components , like islands of players @xmath7 in a sea of players @xmath8 . note also that for erds - rnyi random graphs , the value of @xmath148 is close to @xmath136 . proposition [ prop : inactiveer ] follows from the following proposition whose proof is given in section [ sec : inactive ] . we first introduce some notations : for @xmath84 a random variable , we define for @xmath149 , @xmath150 the thinning of @xmath84 obtained by taking @xmath84 points and then randomly and independently keeping each of them with probability @xmath151 , i.e. given @xmath152 , @xmath153 . we define @xmath154 ( corresponding to the function @xmath155 defined in previous section for @xmath156 and @xmath157 ) , @xmath158 and @xmath159 [ prop : inactive ] consider the random graph @xmath20 satisfying conditions [ cond ] and [ cond2 ] with asymptotic degree distribution @xmath45 . let @xmath84 be a random variable with distribution @xmath51 . if @xmath75 , then @xmath160 . assume moreover that there exists @xmath33 such that @xmath161 for @xmath162 . there is coexistence of a giant component of players @xmath7 and a giant component of players @xmath8 in the pivotal equilibrium if @xmath163 > 0.\end{aligned}\ ] ] we consider now scenarios where @xmath164 $ ] and the initial set of adopters grows linearly with the total population @xmath21 . more precisely , consider now a firm advertising to a group of consumers , who share product information among themselves : potential buyers are not aware of the existence of the product and the firm undertakes costly informative advertising . the firm chooses the fraction of individuals who receive advertisements . individuals are located in a social network modeled by a random network @xmath20 with given vertex degrees as in previous section . however contrary to most work on viral marketing @xcite , @xcite , we assume that the advertiser has limited knowledge about the network : the firm only knows the proportions of individuals having different degrees in the social network . one possibility for the firm is to sample individuals randomly and to decide the costly advertising for this individual based on her degree ( i.e. her number of neighbors ) . the action of the firm is then encoded in a vector @xmath165 , where @xmath166 represents the fraction of individuals with degree @xmath1 which are directly targeted by the firm . these individuals will constitute the seed ( in a permanent adoption model ) and we call them the early adopters . note that the case @xmath167 for all @xmath1 corresponds to a case where the firm samples individuals uniformly . this might be one possibility if it is unable to observe their degrees . in order to optimize its strategy , the firm needs to compute the expected payoff of its marketing strategy as a function of @xmath168 . our results allows to estimate this function in terms of @xmath168 and the degree distribution in the social network . we assume that a buyer might buy either if she receives advertisement from the firm or if she receives information via word of mouth communication @xcite . more precisely , following @xcite , we consider the following general model for the diffusion of information : a buyer obtains information as soon as one of her neighbors buys the product but she decides to buy the product when @xmath169 where @xmath1 is her number of neighbors ( i.e. degree ) and @xmath170 the number of neighbors having the product , @xmath171 is a binomial random variable with parameters @xmath170 and @xmath172 $ ] and @xmath173 is a general random variable ( depending on @xmath1 ) . in words , @xmath174 is the probability that a particular neighbor does influence the possible buyer . this possible buyer does actually buy when the number of influential neighbors having bought the product exceeds a threshold @xmath173 . thus , the thresholds @xmath173 represent the different propensity of nodes to buy the new product when their neighbors do . the fact that these are possibly randomly selected is intended to model our lack of knowledge of their values and a possibly heterogeneous population . note that for @xmath175 and @xmath172 $ ] , our model of diffusion is exactly a contact process with probability of contagion between neighbors equals to @xmath174 . this model is also called the si ( susceptible - infected ) model in mathematical epidemiology @xcite . also for @xmath157 and @xmath176 , we recover the model of @xcite described previously where players @xmath7 are non - buyers and players @xmath8 are buyers . we now give the asymptotic for the final number of buyers for the case @xmath172 $ ] and @xmath177 , with @xmath178 ( the general case with a random threshold is given in theorem [ th : epi ] ) . we first need to introduce some notations . for integers @xmath179 and @xmath180 let @xmath181 denote the binomial probabilities @xmath182 . given a distribution @xmath183 , we define the functions : @xmath184 where @xmath185 . we define @xmath186:\ : g(z;\balpha,\boldp,\pi)= 0\right\}.\end{aligned}\ ] ] we refer to section [ sec : lmf ] for an intuition behind the definitions of the functions @xmath187 and @xmath188 in terms of a branching process approximation of the local structure of the graph . [ prop : ad ] consider the random graph @xmath189 for a sequence @xmath190 satisfying condition [ cond ] . if the strategy of the firm is given by @xmath168 , then the final number of buyers is given by @xmath191 provided @xmath192 , or @xmath193 $ ] , and further @xmath194 for any @xmath195 in some interval @xmath196 . for three different values of @xmath197 ( @xmath198 and @xmath199 ) . right : function @xmath200 ( the green function is @xmath201 , the size of the initial seed).,title="fig:",width=188 ] for three different values of @xmath197 ( @xmath198 and @xmath199 ) . right : function @xmath200 ( the green function is @xmath201 , the size of the initial seed).,title="fig:",width=188 ] to illustrate this result , we consider the simple case of erds - rnyi random graphs @xmath53 with @xmath157 , @xmath167 for all @xmath1 , and @xmath202 where @xmath112 is the contagion threshold for this network ( defined in previous section ) . for simplicity , we omit to write explicitly the dependence in @xmath174 and replace the dependence in @xmath51 by the parameter @xmath52 . as we will see , for some values of @xmath52 there is a phase transition in @xmath203 . for a certain value @xmath204 , we have : if @xmath205 , the size of the diffusion is rather small whereas it becomes very large for @xmath206 . clearly the advertising firm has a high interest in reaching the critical mass of @xmath207 early adopters . this phase transition is reminiscent of the one described in previous section . recall that we are now in a setting where @xmath202 so that a global cascade triggered by a single ( or a small number of ) individual(s ) uniformly sampled is not possible . hence , the firm will have to advertise to a positive fraction of individuals constituting the seed for the diffusion . the intuition is the following : if the seed is too small , then each early adopter starts a small cascade which is stopped by high - degree nodes . when the seed reaches the critical mass , then the cascades coalesce and are able to overcome barriers constituted by high - degree nodes so that a large fraction of the nodes in the giant component of the graph adopt . then increasing the size of the seed has very little effect since most of the time , the new early adopters ( chosen at random by the firm ) are already reached by the global diffusion . our theorem [ th : epi ] makes this heuristic rigorous for the general model of diffusion described above ( with random thresholds ) . we now give some more insights by exploring different scenarios for different values of @xmath10 . . the green ( upper ) curve is the size of the final set of players @xmath8 for @xmath208 given by @xmath209 as a function of @xmath52 . the brown ( lower ) curve corresponds to the minimal size of the seed for a global cascade @xmath210 . the red curve corresponds to the size of a global cascade when @xmath211 similar as in figure [ fig : cascade].,width=188 ] consider first a case where @xmath212 , then thanks to the results of previous section , we know that there exists @xmath213 such that for any @xmath214 , a global cascade is possible with positive probability if only one random player switches to @xmath8 . in particular , if a fraction @xmath203 of individuals uniformly sampled are playing @xmath7 , then for any @xmath215 , such a global cascade will occur with high probability . for @xmath131 , we know that a single player can not trigger a global cascade . more precisely , if players are chosen at random without any information on the underlying network , any set of initial adopters with size @xmath82 can not trigger a global cascade , as shown by theorem [ prop : cascade ] . however the final size of the set of players playing @xmath8 is a discontinuous function of @xmath203 the size of the initial seed . if @xmath204 is defined as the point at which this function is discontinuous , we have : for @xmath205 , the final set of players @xmath8 will be only slightly larger than @xmath203 but if @xmath206 the final set of players @xmath8 will be very large . hence we will say that there is a global cascade when @xmath206 and that there is no global cascade when @xmath205 . as shown in figure [ fig : qpetit ] , for @xmath212 , we have @xmath216 for @xmath217 $ ] and @xmath218 for @xmath131 . in figure [ fig : qpetit ] , we also see that our definition of global cascade when @xmath131 is consistent with our previous definition since the function @xmath219 giving the size of the final set of players @xmath8 when the seed has normalized size @xmath204 is continuous in @xmath52 and agrees with the previous curve for the size of the final set of players @xmath8 when @xmath220 and with only one early adopter . . minimal size of the seed for a global cascade @xmath210 as a function of @xmath52.,width=188 ] we now consider the case where @xmath221 . in this case , thanks to the results of previous section , we know that for any value of @xmath52 , a single initial player @xmath8 ( sampled uniformly ) can not trigger a global cascade . but our definition of @xmath204 still makes sense and we now have @xmath218 for all @xmath52 . figure [ fig : alphac ] gives a plot of the function @xmath222 . we see that again there are two regimes associated with the low / high connectivity of the graph . for low values of @xmath52 , the function @xmath223 is non - increasing in @xmath52 . this situation corresponds to the intuition that is correct for standard epidemic models according to which an increase in the connectivity makes the diffusion easier and hence the size of the critical initial seed will decrease . , low connectivity regime . size of the final set of players @xmath8 , @xmath224 as a function of the size of the initial seed @xmath203 for different values of @xmath225.,width=188 ] figure [ fig : va1 ] shows the size @xmath226 of the final set of players @xmath8 as a function of the size of the initial seed @xmath203 for various small values of @xmath52 . we see that for the smallest values of @xmath52 , there is no discontinuity for the function @xmath227 . in this case @xmath204 is not defined . we also see that there is a natural monotonicity in @xmath52 : as the connectivity increases , the diffusion also increases . however figure [ fig : alphac ] shows that for @xmath228 , the function @xmath222 becomes non - decreasing in @xmath52 . hence even if the connectivity increases , in order to trigger a global cascade the size of the initial seed has to increase too . the intuition for this phenomenon is now clear : in order to trigger a global cascade , the seed has to overcome the local stability of high - degree nodes which now dominates the effect of the increase in connectivity . , high connectivity regime . size of the final set of players @xmath8 , @xmath224 as a function of the size of the initial seed @xmath203 for different values of @xmath229 ( red , green , brown respectively).,width=188 ] figure [ fig : va2 ] shows the size @xmath226 of the final set of players @xmath8 as a function of the size of the initial seed @xmath203 for various value of @xmath52 . here we see that connectivity hurts the start of the diffusion : for small value of @xmath203 , an increase in @xmath52 results in a lower size for the final set of players @xmath8 ! however when @xmath203 reaches the critical value @xmath204 , then a global cascade occurs and its size is an increasing function of @xmath52 . in other words , high connectivity inhibits the global cascade but once it occurs , it facilitates its spread . in this subsection , we say that a player @xmath7 is inactive and a player @xmath8 is active . we describe an approximation to the local structure of the graph and present a heuristic argument which leads easily to a prediction for the asymptotic probability of being active . this heuristic allows us to recover the formulas for the functions @xmath230 . results from this section are not needed for the rigorous proofs given in sections [ sec : thepi ] and [ sec : casc ] and are only presented to give some intuition about our technical formulas . this branching process approximation is standard in the random graphs literature @xcite and is related to the generating function approach in physics @xcite . it is called local mean field ( lmf ) in @xcite and in the particular case of an epidemics with independent contagion on each edge , the lmf approximation was turned into a rigorous argument . for our model of diffusion with threshold , this seems unlikely to be straightforward and our proof will not use the lmf approximation . the lmf model is characterized by its connectivity distribution @xmath51 defined in condition [ cond ] . we now construct a tree - indexed process . let @xmath231 be a galton - watson branching process @xcite with a root which has offspring distribution @xmath232 and all other nodes have offspring distribution @xmath233 given by @xmath234 for all @xmath235 . recall that @xmath236 corresponds to the probability that an edge points to a node with degree @xmath0 , see @xcite . the tree @xmath231 describes the local structure of the graph @xmath237 ( as @xmath21 tends to infinity ) : the exploration of the successive neighborhoods of a given vertex is approximated by the branching process @xmath231 as long as the exploration is local ( typically restricted to a finite neighborhood independent of @xmath21 ) . we denote by @xmath238 the root of the tree and for a node @xmath5 , we denote by @xmath239 the generation of @xmath5 , i.e. the length of the minimal path from @xmath238 to @xmath5 . also we denote @xmath240 if @xmath5 belongs to the children of @xmath6 , i.e. @xmath241 and @xmath6 is on the minimal path from @xmath238 to @xmath5 . for an edge @xmath4 with @xmath240 , we denote by @xmath242 the sub - tree of @xmath231 with root @xmath5 obtained by the deletion of edge @xmath4 from @xmath231 . we now consider the diffusion model described in section [ sec : ad ] ( with threshold for a vertex of degree @xmath1 given by @xmath176 and probability for a neighbor to be influential given by @xmath172 $ ] ) on the tree @xmath231 , where the initial set of active nodes is given by a vector @xmath243}$ ] : if @xmath244 then vertex @xmath5 is in the initial set of active vertices , otherwise @xmath245 . in our model the @xmath246 s are independent bernoulli random variables with parameter @xmath247 where @xmath13 is the degree of node @xmath5 in the tree . thanks to the tree structure , it is possible to compute the probability of being active recursively as follows : for any node @xmath248 , let @xmath249 if node @xmath5 is active on the sub - graph @xmath250 with initial set of active nodes given by the restriction of @xmath251 to individuals in @xmath242 and with individual @xmath6 held fix in the inactive state . then for any node @xmath252 of degree @xmath13 , @xmath5 becomes active if the number of active influential children exceeds @xmath253 . hence , we get @xmath254 where the @xmath255 s are independent bernoulli random variables with parameter @xmath174 . then the state of the root is given by @xmath256 in order to compute the distribution of @xmath257 , we first solve the recursive distributional equation ( rde ) associated to the @xmath258 s : thanks to the tree structure , the random variables @xmath259 in ( [ eq : y ] ) are i.i.d . and have the same distribution as @xmath258 . hence their distribution solve the rde given by @xmath260 where for a given @xmath1 , the random variable @xmath261 is bernoulli with parameter @xmath166 , @xmath262 s are independent bernoulli with parameter @xmath174 , @xmath263 has distribution @xmath233 , @xmath264 and the @xmath258 s are i.i.d . copies ( with unknown distribution ) . to solve the rde ( [ eq : rde ] ) , we need to compute only the mean of the bernoulli random variable @xmath264 . hence taking expectation in ( [ eq : rde ] ) directly gives a fixed - point equation for this mean and the following lemma follows ( its proof is deferred to appendix [ sec : techlem ] ) : [ lem : lmf ] the solutions of the rde ( [ eq : rde ] ) are bernoulli random variable with mean @xmath151 , where @xmath151 is any solution of the fixed point equation : @xmath265 . for any such solution , the random variable @xmath257 defined in ( [ eq : x ] ) is a bernoulli random variable with mean @xmath266 . by the change of variable @xmath267 , we see that lemma [ lem : lmf ] is consistent with proposition [ prop : ad ] and allow to recover the functions @xmath230 . however note that , the rde ( [ eq : rde ] ) has in general several solutions one being the trivial one with @xmath268 corresponding to the trivial equilibrium where every node are active . the fact that this rde has several solutions is a major difficulty in order to turn this lmf approximation into a rigorous argument . finally , the crucial point allowing previous computation is the fact that in recursion ( [ eq : y ] ) the @xmath258 can be computed `` bottom - up '' so that the @xmath258 s of a given generation ( from the root ) are independent . the @xmath258 s in ( [ eq : x ] ) encode the information that @xmath5 is activated by a node in the subtree of @xmath231 `` below '' @xmath5 ( and not by the root ) . if one considers a node in the original graph and runs a directed contagion model on a local neighborhood of this node where only directed contagion toward this node are allowed , then the state of the graph seen from this node is well approximated by the @xmath258 s . we first present the model for the diffusion process and then our main results for the spread of the diffusion . in this section , we describe the diffusion for any given finite graph @xmath237 with vertex set @xmath36 $ ] . we still denote by @xmath13 the degree of node @xmath39 $ ] . from now on , a vertex @xmath5 is either active or inactive . in our model , the initial set of active nodes @xmath269 ( the seed ) will remain active during the whole process of the diffusion ( results for the non - monotonic model are derived in section [ sec : inactive ] ) . we will consider * single activation * where the seed contains only one vertex and * degree based activation * where the vertex @xmath5 is in the seed with probability @xmath247 , where @xmath13 is the degree of the vertex independently of the others . in other words , each node @xmath5 draws independently of each other a bernoulli random variable @xmath246 with parameter @xmath247 and is considered as initially active if @xmath244 and not initially active otherwise . in the case of degree based activation , we denote @xmath165 the parameters of this activation . in particular , if @xmath270 for all @xmath1 , then a fraction @xmath203 chosen uniformly at random among the population is activated before the diffusion takes place . * symmetric threshold model : * we first present the symmetric threshold model which generalizes the bootstrap percolation @xcite : a node becomes active when a certain threshold fraction of neighbors are already active . we allow the threshold fraction to be a random variable with distribution depending on the degree of the node and such that thresholds are independent among nodes . formally , we define for each node @xmath5 a sequence of random variables in @xmath271 denoted by @xmath272 . the threshold associated to node @xmath5 is @xmath273 where @xmath13 is the degree of node @xmath5 . we assume that for any two vertices @xmath5 and @xmath6 , the sequences @xmath272 and @xmath274 are independent and have the same law as a sequence denoted by @xmath275 . for @xmath276 , we denote @xmath277 the probability distribution of the threshold for a node of degree @xmath278 . for example in the model of @xcite described in the introduction , we take @xmath279 so that @xmath280 . we will use the notation @xmath281 and @xmath282 denotes the distribution of thresholds . now the progressive dynamic of the diffusion on the finite graph @xmath237 operates as follows : some set of nodes @xmath269 starts out being active ; all other nodes are inactive . time operates in discrete steps @xmath283 . at a given time @xmath284 , any inactive node @xmath5 becomes active if its number of active neighbors is at least @xmath285 . this in turn may cause other nodes to become active . it is easy to see that the final set of active nodes ( after @xmath21 time steps if the network is of size @xmath21 ) only depends on the initial set @xmath269 ( and not on the order of the activations ) and can be obtained as follows : set @xmath286 for all @xmath5 . then as long as there exists @xmath5 such that @xmath287 , set @xmath288 , where @xmath289 means that @xmath5 and @xmath6 share an edge in @xmath237 . when this algorithm finishes , the final state of node @xmath5 is represented by @xmath290 : @xmath288 if node @xmath5 is active and @xmath291 otherwise . note that we allow for the possibility @xmath292 in which case , node @xmath5 is never activated unless it belongs to the initial set @xmath269 . note also that the condition @xmath293 is actually not restrictive . if we wish to consider a model where @xmath294 is possible , we just need to modify the initial seed @xmath269 so as to put node @xmath5 in @xmath269 if @xmath294 . hence this model is equivalent to ours if we increase @xmath247 accordingly . * percolated threshold model : * this model depends on a parameter @xmath172 $ ] and a distribution of random thresholds @xmath295 given by @xmath296 as described above . given any graph @xmath237 and initial set @xmath269 , we now proceed in two phases . * bond percolation : randomly delete each edge with probability @xmath297 independently of all other edges . we denote the resulting random graph by @xmath298 ; * apply the symmetric threshold model with thresholds @xmath173 : set @xmath286 and then as long as there is @xmath5 such that @xmath299 , set @xmath288 , where @xmath300 means that @xmath5 and @xmath6 share an edge in @xmath298 and @xmath13 is the degree of node @xmath5 in the original graph @xmath237 . clearly if @xmath157 , this is exactly the symmetric threshold model . if in addition @xmath301 , then this model is known as bootstrap percolation @xcite . on the other hand if @xmath302 and @xmath175 for any @xmath1 , then this is the contact process with probability of activation @xmath174 on each edge . note that the percolated threshold model is not equivalent to the symmetric threshold model on the ( bond ) percolated graph since threshold depends on the degree in the original graph ( and not in the percolated graph ) . recall that for integers @xmath179 and @xmath180 , @xmath181 denotes the binomial probabilities @xmath182 . for a graph @xmath237 , let @xmath303 and @xmath304 denote the numbers of vertices and edges in @xmath237 respectively . in this section , we assume that the followings are given : a sequence of independent thresholds @xmath305 drawn according to a distribution @xmath306 , a parameter @xmath172 $ ] and an activation set drawn according to the distribution @xmath168 . the subgraph of @xmath189 induced by the activated ( resp . inactive ) nodes at the end of the diffusion is denoted by @xmath307 ( resp . @xmath308 ) . for @xmath309 , we denote by @xmath310 the number of vertices in @xmath308 with degree @xmath278 in @xmath237 and @xmath0 in @xmath308 , i.e. the number of vertices with degree @xmath278 in @xmath237 which are not activated and with @xmath0 neighbors which are not activated either . we denote by @xmath311 the number of activated vertices of degree @xmath278 in @xmath237 ( and with possibly lower degree in @xmath307 ) . we define the functions : @xmath312 where @xmath185 . we define @xmath313:\ : g(z;\boldp,\boldt,\balpha , \pi)= 0\right\}.\end{aligned}\ ] ] we refer to appendix [ sec : max ] for a justification of the use of the @xmath314 in ( [ eq : max ] ) . [ th : epi ] consider the random graph @xmath189 ( or @xmath41 ) for a sequence @xmath43 satisfying condition [ cond ] . we are given with a sequence of independent thresholds @xmath305 drawn according to a distribution @xmath306 , a parameter @xmath172 $ ] and an activation set drawn according to the distribution @xmath168 . for the percolated threshold diffusion on the graph @xmath189 , we have : if @xmath315 , or if @xmath316 $ ] , and further @xmath317 for any @xmath195 in some interval @xmath196 , then @xmath318 if we condition the induced graph @xmath319 of inactive nodes in @xmath41 on its degree sequence @xmath320 and let @xmath321 be the number of its vertices , then @xmath319 has the distribution of @xmath322 . the proof of this theorem is given in section [ sec : thepi ] . note that proposition [ prop : ad ] follows easily . in this section , we look at the diffusion with one ( or a small number @xmath82 of ) initial active node(s ) in @xmath189 . for @xmath323 $ ] , let @xmath324 ( resp . @xmath325 ) be the subgraph induced by the final active nodes with initial active node @xmath326 ( resp . initial active nodes @xmath327 ) . we also define @xmath328 as the subgraph induced by the inactive nodes with initial active node @xmath326 . the set of vertices of @xmath324 and @xmath328 is a partition of the vertices of the original graph . to ease notation , we denote @xmath329 , @xmath330 and @xmath331 . we define @xmath332 we also define @xmath333 and @xmath334 . we call the following condition the cascade condition : @xmath335 which can be rewritten as @xmath336>{{\mathbb{e}}}[d]$ ] where @xmath84 is a random variable with distribution @xmath51 . we denote by @xmath337 the largest connected component of the graph @xmath338 on which we apply a bond percolation with parameter @xmath174 ( i.e. we remove each edge independently with probability @xmath297 ) and then apply a site percolation by removing all vertices with @xmath339 . the vertices of the connected graph @xmath340 are called pivotal vertices : for any @xmath341 , we have @xmath342 . [ prop : cascade ] consider the random graph @xmath189 ( or @xmath41 ) for a sequence @xmath43 satisfying conditions [ cond ] and [ cond2 ] . we are given with a sequence of independent thresholds @xmath305 drawn according to a distribution @xmath306 and a parameter @xmath172 $ ] . * if the cascade condition ( [ eq : casc ] ) is satisfied , then @xmath343 moreover , for any @xmath341 , we have w.h.p . @xmath344 where @xmath345 is defined by ( [ eq : defxi ] ) . moreover if @xmath346 or @xmath345 is such that there exists @xmath33 with @xmath347 for @xmath162 , then we have for any @xmath341 : @xmath348 if we condition the induced graph @xmath349 of inactive nodes in @xmath41 on its degree sequence @xmath350 and let @xmath351 be the number of its vertices , then @xmath349 has the distribution of @xmath352 . * if @xmath353 , then for any @xmath354 , @xmath355 . a proof of this theorem is given in section [ sec : casc ] . we end this section with some remarks : if the distribution of @xmath173 does not depend on @xmath1 , then the cascade condition becomes with @xmath84 a random variable with distribution @xmath51 : @xmath356}{{{\mathbb{e}}}[d(d-1)]}.\end{aligned}\ ] ] in particular , if @xmath357 ( i.e. the diffusion is a simple exploration process ) , then we find the well - known condition for the existence of a giant component. this corresponds to existing results in the literature see in particular theorem 3.9 in @xcite which extend the standard result of @xcite . more generally , in the case @xmath172 $ ] and @xmath357 ( corresponding to the contact process ) , a simple computation shows that @xmath358 where @xmath359 $ ] is the generating function of the asymptotic degree distribution . applying theorems [ th : epi ] and [ prop : cascade ] allow to obtain results for the contact process . similarly , the bootstrap percolation has been studied in random regular graphs @xcite and random graphs with given vertex degrees @xcite . the bootstrap percolation corresponds to the particular case of the percolated threshold model with @xmath157 and @xmath360 and our theorems [ th : epi ] and [ prop : cascade ] allow to recover results for the size of the diffusion . finally , the case where @xmath176 and @xmath157 implies directly proposition [ prop : cap ] . it is well - known that it is often simpler to study the random multigraph @xmath41 with given vertex sequence @xmath43 defined in section [ sec : conf ] . we consider asymptotics as the number of vertices tends to infinity and thus assume throughout the paper that we are given , for each @xmath21 , a sequence @xmath361 with @xmath362 even . we may obtain @xmath189 by conditioning the multigraph @xmath41 on being a simple graph . by @xcite , we know that the condition @xmath363 implies @xmath364 . in this case , many results transfer immediately from @xmath41 to @xmath189 , for example , every result of the type @xmath365 for some events @xmath366 , and thus every result saying that some parameter converges in probability to some non - random value . this includes every results in the present paper . henceforth , we will in this paper study the random multigraph @xmath41 and in a last step ( left to the reader ) transfer the results to @xmath189 by conditioning . we run the dynamic of the diffusion of section [ sec : stm ] on a general graph @xmath41 in order to compute the final size of the diffusion in a similar way as in @xcite . the main point here consists in coupling the construction of the graph with the dynamic of the diffusion . the main difference with previous analysis consists in adding to each vertex a threshold with distribution @xmath306 independently form the graph @xmath41 as described in section [ sec : stm ] . the proof of theorem [ th : epi ] follows then easily see section [ sec : spread ] . in order to prove theorem [ prop : cascade ] , we use the same idea of coupling ( in a similar spirit as in @xcite for the analysis of the giant component ) but we have to deal with an additional difficulty due to the following lack of symmetry : if @xmath324 is the final set of the diffusion with only @xmath326 as initial active node , then for any @xmath367 , we do not have in general @xmath368 . we take care of this difficulty in section [ sec : casc ] . in the next section , we present a preliminary lemma that will be used in the proofs . a pure death process with rate 1 is a process that starts with some number of balls whose lifetime are i.i.d . rate 1 exponentials . each time a ball dies , it is removed . now consider @xmath21 bins with independent rate @xmath369 death processes . to each bin , we attach a couple @xmath370 where @xmath13 is the number of balls at time 0 in the bin and @xmath273 is the threshold corresponding to the bin . we now modify the death process as follows : all balls are initially white . for any living ball , when it dies , with probability @xmath297 and independently of everything else , we color it green ( an leave it in he bin ) , otherwise we remove it from the bin . let @xmath371 and @xmath372 denote the number of white and green balls respectively in bin @xmath6 at time @xmath284 , where @xmath373 and @xmath374 . let @xmath375 be the number of bins that have @xmath278 balls at time @xmath12 and @xmath0 white balls , @xmath5 green balls at time @xmath284 and threshold @xmath376 , i.e. @xmath377 . in what follows we suppress the superscripts to lighten the notation . the following lemma is an extension of lemma 4.4 in @xcite : [ lem : death ] consider the @xmath21 independent processes defined above and assume that the sequence @xmath43 satisfies condition [ cond ] where @xmath45 can be a defective probability distribution : @xmath378 . we assume that the thresholds @xmath379}$ ] are independent in @xmath5 and have distribution @xmath282 as described in section [ sec : stm ] . then , with the above notation , as @xmath23 , @xmath380 let @xmath381 . in particular @xmath382 . first fix integers @xmath383 and @xmath6 with @xmath384 . consider the @xmath385 bins that start with @xmath278 balls and with threshold @xmath376 . for @xmath386 , let @xmath387 be the time the @xmath6th ball is removed or recolored in the @xmath170th such bin . then @xmath388 . moreover , for the @xmath170th bin , we have @xmath389 . multiplying by @xmath390 and using glivenko - cantelli theorem ( see e.g. proposition 4.24 in @xcite ) , we have @xmath391 since @xmath392 ( by condition [ cond](i ) and the law of large numbers ) , we see that @xmath393 the law of @xmath394 given @xmath395 and @xmath396 is a binomial distribution with parameters @xmath397 and @xmath297 . hence by the law of large numbers , we have @xmath398 hence each term in ( [ eq : limsup ] ) tends to @xmath12 in probability . the same holds for any finite partial sum . let @xmath33 and @xmath269 be such that @xmath399 . by condition [ cond](iii ) , we have @xmath400 . hence , also @xmath401 . so that for sufficiently large @xmath21 , we get @xmath402 and @xmath403 and the lemma follows . our proof of theorem [ th : epi ] is an adaptation of the coupling argument in @xcite . we start by analyzing the symmetric threshold model . we can view the algorithm of section [ sec : stm ] as follows : start with the graph @xmath237 and remove vertices from @xmath269 , i.e. the initially active nodes . as a result , if vertex @xmath5 has not been removed , its degree has been lowered . we denote by @xmath404 the degree of @xmath5 in the evolving graph . then iteratively remove vertices @xmath5 such that @xmath405 . all removed vertices at the end of this procedure are active and all vertices left are inactive . it is easily seen that we obtain the same result by removing edges where one endpoint satisfy @xmath405 , until no such edge remains , and finally removing all isolated vertices , which correspond to active nodes . regard each edge as consisting of two half - edges , each half - edge having one endpoint . we introduce types of vertices . we set the type of vertices in the seed @xmath269 to @xmath8 . say that a vertex ( not in @xmath269 ) is of type @xmath7 if @xmath406 and of type @xmath8 otherwise . in particular at the beginning of the process , all vertices not in @xmath269 are of type @xmath7 since @xmath407 and all vertices in @xmath269 are by definition of type @xmath8 . as the algorithm evolves , @xmath408 decreases so that some type @xmath7 vertices become of type @xmath8 during the execution of the algorithm . similarly , say that a half - edge is of type @xmath7 or @xmath8 when its endpoint is . as long as there is any half - edge of type @xmath8 , choose one such half - edge uniformly at random and remove the edge it belongs to . this may change the other endpoint from @xmath7 to @xmath8 ( by decreasing @xmath409 ) and thus create new half - edges of type @xmath8 . when there are no half - edges of type @xmath8 left , we stop . then the final set of active nodes is the set of vertices of type @xmath8 ( which are all isolated ) . as in @xcite , we regard vertices as bins and half - edges as balls . at each step , we remove first one random ball from the set of balls in @xmath8-bins and then a random ball without restriction . we stop when there are no non - empty @xmath8-bins . we thus alternately remove a random @xmath8-ball and a random ball . we may just as well say that we first remove a random @xmath8-ball . we then remove balls in pairs , first a random ball and then a random @xmath8-ball , and stop with the random ball , leaving no @xmath8-ball to remove . we change the description a little by introducing colors . initially all balls are white , and we begin again by removing one random @xmath8-ball . subsequently , in each deletion step we first remove a random white ball and then recolor a random white @xmath8-ball red ; this is repeated until no more white @xmath8-balls remain . we now run this deletion process in continuous time such that , if there are @xmath6 white balls remaining , then we wait an exponential time with mean @xmath410 until the next pair of deletions . in other words , we make deletions at rate @xmath6 . this means that each white ball is deleted with rate 1 and that , when we delete a white ball , we also color a random white @xmath8-ball red . let @xmath411 and @xmath412 denote the numbers of white @xmath7-balls and white @xmath8-balls at time @xmath284 , respectively , and @xmath413 denotes the number of @xmath7-bins at time @xmath284 . since red balls are ignored , we may make a final change of rules , and say that all balls are removed at rate @xmath369 and that , when a white ball is removed , a random white @xmath8-ball is colored red ; we stop when we should recolor a white @xmath8-ball but there is no such ball . let @xmath414 be the stopping time of this process . first consider the white balls only . there are no white @xmath8-balls left at @xmath414 , so @xmath415 has reached zero . however , let us consider the last deletion and recoloring step as completed by redefining @xmath416 ; we then see that @xmath414 is characterized by @xmath416 and @xmath417 for @xmath418 . moreover , the @xmath7-balls left at @xmath414 ( which are all white ) are exactly the half - edges in the induced subgraph @xmath308 of inactive nodes . hence , the number of edges in this subgraph is @xmath419 , while the number of nodes not activated is @xmath420 . if we consider only the total number @xmath421 of white balls in the bins , ignoring the types , the process is as follows : each ball dies at rate @xmath369 and upon its death another ball is also sacrificed . the process @xmath421 is a death process with rate @xmath57 ( up to time @xmath414 ) . consequently , by lemma 4.3 of @xcite ( or lemma [ lem : death ] above ) , we have @xmath422 since condition [ cond ] ( iii ) implies @xmath423 . now if we consider the final version of the process restricted to @xmath7-bins , it corresponds exactly to the death process studied in section [ sec : lem ] above with @xmath157 . we need only to compute the initial condition for this process . for a degree based activation , each vertex of degree @xmath278 is activated ( i.e. the corresponding bin becomes a @xmath8-bin ) with probability @xmath424 . hence by the law of large numbers , the number of @xmath7-bins with initially @xmath278 balls and threshold @xmath376 is @xmath425 . with the notation of lemma [ lem : death ] , we have @xmath426 with the defective probability distribution @xmath427 . hence by lemma [ lem : death ] we get ( recall that @xmath157 here ) : @xmath428 it is then easy to finish the proof as in @xcite for this model ( the complete argument is presented below for the more general percolated threshold model ) . in particular , it ends the proof of theorem [ th : epi ] for the case @xmath157 . we now consider the percolated threshold model with @xmath429 . we modify the process as follows : for any white @xmath7-ball when it dies , with probability @xmath297 , we color it green instead of removing it . a bin is of type @xmath7 if @xmath430 , where @xmath0 is the number of withe balls in the bin , @xmath5 the number of green balls ( which did not transmit the diffusion ) and @xmath278 and @xmath376 are the initial degree and threshold . let @xmath411 be the number of white @xmath7-balls . by lemma [ lem : death ] , we now have : @xmath431 in particular , we have thanks to lemma [ lem : equiv ] ( in appendix [ sec : techlem ] ) for @xmath432 , @xmath433 by looking at white balls ( without taking types in consideration ) , we see that equation ( [ eq : ab ] ) is still valid . hence , we have @xmath434 for simplicity we write @xmath435 for @xmath436 . assume now that @xmath437 is a constant independent of @xmath21 with @xmath438 so that @xmath439 and @xmath440 . hence , we have @xmath441 for @xmath442 $ ] and thus @xmath443 for @xmath444 . we can find some @xmath445 such that @xmath446 for @xmath444 . but @xmath416 , so if @xmath447 then @xmath448 and from ( [ eq : b ] ) , we have @xmath449 . in case @xmath315 , we may take any finite @xmath450 and find @xmath451 and ( [ eq : limtau ] ) with @xmath452 , yields that @xmath453 in case @xmath454 , by the hypothesis we can find @xmath455 such that @xmath456 . if @xmath457 , then @xmath458 and thus @xmath459 . hence by ( [ eq : b ] ) , we have @xmath460 . since we can choose @xmath450 and @xmath461 arbitrarily close to @xmath462 , we have @xmath463 and ( [ eq : limtau ] ) with @xmath464 yields that @xmath465 note that @xmath466 and @xmath467 . hence we proved theorem [ th : epi ] for @xmath468 and @xmath469 . the results for @xmath470 and @xmath471 follows from the same argument , once we note that @xmath472 finally , the statement concerning the distribution of the induced subgraph @xmath319 follows from the fact that this subgraph has not been explored when previous algorithm stops . we start this section with some simple calculations . we define for @xmath473 $ ] , @xmath474 for @xmath475 and @xmath476 , we have @xmath477 so that for @xmath473 $ ] , we have @xmath478 . hence by condition [ cond2 ] , @xmath479 is differentiable on @xmath480 $ ] and we have @xmath481 in particular , we have @xmath482 so that we have @xmath483 . note also that @xmath484 and @xmath485 . consider now the case ( ii ) where @xmath486 , so that @xmath487 . the proof for an upper bound on @xmath488 follows easily from theorem [ th : epi ] . take a parameter @xmath489 with @xmath490 for all @xmath1 . clearly the final set of active nodes @xmath491 will be greater than for any seed with size @xmath83 . now when @xmath203 goes to zero , the fact that @xmath492 ensures that @xmath493 in theorem [ th : epi ] so that @xmath494 . hence point ( ii ) in theorem [ prop : cascade ] follows . we now concentrate on the case where the cascade condition holds . in particular we have @xmath495 so that @xmath345 defined in ( [ eq : defxi ] ) by @xmath496 is strictly less than one and we have @xmath497 also as soon as there exists @xmath33 such that @xmath347 for @xmath498 , we can use the same argument as above . since , we have in this case @xmath499 as @xmath500 , it gives an upper bound that matches with the statement ( i ) of theorem [ prop : cascade ] . in order to prove a lower bound , we follow the general approach of @xcite . we modify the algorithm defined in section [ sec : spread ] as follows : the initial set @xmath269 now contains only one vertex , say @xmath501 . when there is no half - edge ( or ball ) of type @xmath8 , we say that we make an exception and we select a vertex ( or a bin ) of type @xmath7 uniformly at random among all vertices of type @xmath7 . we declare its white half - edges of type @xmath8 and remove its other half - edges , i.e. remove the green balls contained in the corresponding bin if there are any . exceptions are done instantaneously . for any set of nodes @xmath502 , let @xmath503 be the subgraph induced by the final active nodes with initial active nodes @xmath502 . if @xmath504 , then clearly when the algorithm has exhausted the half - edges of type @xmath8 , it removed the subgraph @xmath505 from the graph and all edges with one endpoint in @xmath505 . then an exception is made by selecting a vertex say @xmath506 in @xmath507 . similarly when the algorithm exhausted the half - edges of type @xmath8 , it removed the subgraph @xmath508 and all edges with one endpoint in this set of vertices . more generally , if @xmath170 exceptions are made consisting of selecting nodes @xmath509 , then before the @xmath510-th exception is made ( or at termination of the algorithm if there is no more exception made ) , the algorithm removed the subgraph @xmath503 and all edges with one endpoint in this set of vertices . we use the same notation as in section [ sec : spread ] . in particular , we still have : @xmath511 we now ignore the effect of the exceptions by letting @xmath512 be the number of white @xmath7 balls if no exceptions were made , i.e. assuming @xmath513 for all @xmath284 . if @xmath514 is the maximum degree of @xmath515 , then we have @xmath516 $ ] . by condition [ cond ] ( iii ) , @xmath517 , and thus @xmath518 . hence we can apply results of previous section : @xmath519 we now prove that : @xmath520 the fact that @xmath521 is clear . furthermore , @xmath522 increases only when exceptions are made . if an exception is made at time @xmath284 , then the process @xmath8 reached zero and a vertex with @xmath6 white half - edges is selected so that @xmath523 . hence we have @xmath524 between exceptions , if @xmath7 decreases by one then so does @xmath525 , hence @xmath522 does not increase . consequently if @xmath278 was the last time before @xmath284 that an exception was performed , then @xmath526 and ( [ eq : bd ] ) follows . let @xmath527 , then we have @xmath528 equation ( [ eq : bd ] ) can be written as @xmath529 we first assume that @xmath345 given by ( [ eq : defxi ] ) is such that @xmath530 and there exists @xmath33 such that @xmath347 and hence @xmath531 for @xmath162 . let @xmath532 . then by ( [ eq : pos ] ) , we have @xmath533 for @xmath534 so that @xmath535 and hence by ( [ eq : tb ] ) , @xmath536 by condition [ cond ] ( iii ) , @xmath537 . consequently , ( [ eq : bd1 ] ) yields @xmath538 and thus by ( [ eq : tb ] ) @xmath539 by assumption , there exists @xmath33 sufficiently small for @xmath540 . since @xmath533 on the interval @xmath541 $ ] , ( [ eq : b2 ] ) implies that w.h.p . @xmath412 remains positive on @xmath541 $ ] , and thus no exception is made during this interval . on the other hand , @xmath540 and ( [ eq : tb ] ) implies @xmath542 , while @xmath543 . thus with @xmath544 , w.h.p . @xmath545 while ( [ eq : tbtau ] ) yields @xmath546 w.h.p . consequently , w.h.p . @xmath547 and an exception is performed between @xmath414 and @xmath548 . let @xmath549 be the last time an exception was performed before @xmath550 and let @xmath551 be the next time it is performed . we have shown that for any @xmath33 , w.h.p . @xmath552 and @xmath553 . [ lm : int ] let @xmath554 and @xmath555 be two random times when an exception is performed , with @xmath556 , and assume that @xmath557 and @xmath558 , where @xmath559 . if @xmath560 is the number of vertices removed by the algorithm by time @xmath561 , then @xmath562 in particular , if @xmath563 , then @xmath564 . by definition , we have : @xmath565 since @xmath566 and @xmath567 is continuous , @xmath568 , and ( [ eq : tb ] ) and ( [ eq : bd1 ] ) imply , in analogy with ( [ eq : tbinf ] ) and ( [ eq : tbtau ] ) , @xmath569 and @xmath570 let @xmath571 be the number of bins if no exceptions were made . then we clearly have @xmath572 since each time an exception is made @xmath573 increases by one while @xmath522 increases by more than one . hence ( [ eq : lev ] ) follows from results in previous section . let @xmath574 ( resp . @xmath575 ) be the subgraph induced by the vertices removed by the algorithm between @xmath12 and @xmath549 ( resp . @xmath551 ) . by lemma [ lm : int ] , we have @xmath576 hence informally , the exception made at time @xmath549 triggers a large cascade . now consider the case @xmath346 . note in particular that we have @xmath577 and since @xmath578 , we also have @xmath579 . then with the same argument as above , we have that @xmath412 remains positive on @xmath580 and thus no exception is made after a last exception made at time @xmath549 with @xmath581 . hence ( [ eq : c ] ) and ( [ eq : c ] ) follow with @xmath575 being the whole graph ( except possibly @xmath83 vertices ) , @xmath579 . we now finish the proof of theorem [ prop : cascade ] in the case where @xmath346 or there exists @xmath33 such that @xmath347 for @xmath582 . first by @xcite theorems 3.5 and 3.9 , the cascade condition implies that @xmath583 . the result @xmath584 could be derived from @xcite . we give an alternative proof for this result at the end of this section . for now , we denote @xmath585 . coming back to the diffusion process analyzed above , we clearly have @xmath586 . we now prove that @xmath587 . this is clear in the case @xmath346 . we now concentrate on the case @xmath530 . first , let @xmath588 be the first time after @xmath551 when an exception is made . since @xmath522 increases by at most @xmath589 each time an exception is made , we obtain from ( [ eq : ta - a ] ) : @xmath590 hence similarly as in ( [ eq : tau ] ) , we have for every @xmath33 , w.h.p . @xmath591 . since also @xmath592 , it follows that @xmath593 . if @xmath594 is the subgraph removed by the algorithm between @xmath551 and @xmath588 , then lemma [ lm : int ] implies that @xmath595 . assume now that @xmath596 , then with probability at least @xmath597 , the vertex chosen for the exception at @xmath551 belongs to @xmath340 and then we have @xmath598 , in contradiction with @xmath595 . hence we have @xmath599 and then @xmath587 as claimed . we clearly have for any @xmath341 : @xmath600 hence we only need to prove that @xmath601 . to see this , attach to each vertex @xmath5 a random variable @xmath602 uniformly distributed over @xmath480 $ ] . each time an exception has to be made , pick the vertex among the remaining ones with minimal @xmath602 so that we do not change the algorithm described at the beginning of the section . from the analysis above , we see that all exceptions made before @xmath549 are vertices not in @xmath340 and the exception made at time @xmath549 belongs to @xmath340 . now consider the graph @xmath603 obtained from the original graph where @xmath574 has been removed but all other variables are the same as in the original graph . since @xmath604 , this graph satisfies conditions [ cond ] and [ cond2 ] . hence previous analysis applies and we have in addition that the first exception made by the algorithm belongs to @xmath340 since a pivotal vertex in @xmath237 is also pivotal in @xmath603 . hence the subgraph of @xmath603 removed between times @xmath605 and @xmath606 by the algorithm is exactly @xmath607 in @xmath603 . since @xmath603 is a subgraph of @xmath237 , we have @xmath608 in the original graph . and the first claim in ( i ) follows from ( [ eq : c ] ) applied to the graph @xmath603 . the second claim in ( i ) follows exactly as in the proof of theorem [ th : epi ] given in previous section . now consider the case where @xmath530 but for any @xmath33 , there exists @xmath162 such that @xmath609 and hence @xmath610 . the idea to get a lower bound is to let @xmath174 vary . since @xmath611 , for any @xmath612 , we see that by a standard coupling argument , for any given initial seed all active nodes in the model with @xmath613 will also be active in the model with @xmath174 . hence the model with @xmath613 provides a lower bound for the number of active nodes in the model with @xmath174 . now consider the function @xmath614 as a function of @xmath174 . we have @xmath615\end{aligned}\ ] ] since @xmath345 is a local minimum of @xmath616 and @xmath155 is differentiable as a function of @xmath195 , we have @xmath617 hence we have @xmath618 . in particular for @xmath619 , we have @xmath620 . let @xmath621 , then we have @xmath622 for any @xmath623 and @xmath624 for @xmath625 . moreover , we have @xmath626 as @xmath627 and previous argument is valid for the model with @xmath613 as close as desired from @xmath174 showing that @xmath628 is a lower bound for the fraction of active nodes in the model with @xmath174 . we finish this proof by computing the asymptotic for the size of @xmath340 using our previous analysis but for a modified threshold as done in @xcite . we add a bar for quantities associated to this new model . namely , consider a modification of the original diffusion with threshold @xmath629 . in words , a node @xmath5 becomes active if one of its neighbor is active and @xmath630 in the original diffusion model . clearly the nodes that become active in this model need to have only one active neighbor in the original diffusion model with parameter @xmath631 . we denote by @xmath632 the subgraph of final active nodes with initial active node @xmath326 . note that our algorithm is an exploration process of the components of the graph on which we apply a bond percolation with parameter @xmath174 and a site percolation by removing all vertices with @xmath339 . in particular , the largest component explored is exactly @xmath340 . note that the computations made before are valid with the following functions : @xmath633 hence we have @xmath634,\ : \bg(z)=0 \}$ ] . note that if we denote @xmath635 , then we have @xmath636 in particular , @xmath637 is concave on @xmath638 $ ] and strictly concave unless @xmath639 for @xmath640 . note also that @xmath641 , so that under the cascade condition @xmath642 and @xmath637 is strictly concave . hence , we have @xmath643 and @xmath644 for @xmath645 and if @xmath530 , then @xmath646 for @xmath647 . in particular , previous analysis allows to conclude that @xmath584 . we start with the proof of proposition [ prop : inactive ] . by theorem [ prop : cascade ] , when the cascade condition holds , the set of active vertices contain the set of pivotal vertices and hence has a giant component . we denote @xmath648 the induced subgraph of inactive vertices , in the pivotal equilibrium ( i.e. in the final state when all pivotal nodes are initially active ) . by theorem [ prop : cascade ] , we have for @xmath649 , the number of vertices in @xmath648 with degree @xmath0 in @xmath648 : @xmath650 we denote @xmath651 . thanks to the result on the distribution of @xmath648 , there is a giant component of inactive vertices if @xmath652 which can be rewritten as in proposition [ prop : inactive ] . we now prove proposition [ prop : inactiveer ] . we assume that @xmath653 , @xmath157 and @xmath654 . the function @xmath655 is increasing for @xmath656 and then decreasing . we assume that @xmath10 is fixed such that the cascade condition holds . then @xmath657 . then @xmath658 while @xmath659 . we denote @xmath660 then , there is a giant component of inactive vertices if @xmath661 . both functions are non - increasing in @xmath137 and are intersecting only once in @xmath662 . this paper analyzes the spread of new behaviors or technologies in large social networks . our analysis is motivated by the two qualitative features of global cascades in social and economics systems : they occur rarely , but are large when they do . in our simplest model , agents play a local interaction binary game where the underlying social network is modeled by a sparse random graph . considering the deterministic best response dynamics , we compute the contagion threshold for this model . we find that when the social network is sufficiently sparse , the contagion is limited by the low connectivity of the network ; when it is sufficiently dense , the contagion is limited by the stability of the high - degree nodes . this phenomenon explains why contagion is possible only in a given range of the global connectivity . most importantly , we identify the set of agents able to trigger a large cascade : the pivotal players , i.e. the largest component of players requiring a single neighbor to change strategy in order to follow the change . the notion of pivotal player is crucial in the context of random graphs . cascades occur only when pivotal players represent a positive fraction of the population and in this case , any cascade will be triggered by such a pivotal player . we found that these pivotal players exist only if the connectivity of the network is in a given range . at both ends of this range ( i.e. for low and high - connectivity ) , the number of pivotal players is low . however in the high - connectivity case , we found that the system displays a robust - yet - fragile quality : while pivotal players are very rare , they trigger very large cascades . this feature makes global contagions exceptionally hard to anticipate . we also analyze possible equilibria of the game and in particular , we find conditions for the existence of equilibria with co - existent conventions . motivated by social advertising , we also consider cases where the number of pivotal players is a negligible fraction of the population . in this case , contagion is still possible if the set of initial adopters is sufficiently large . we compute the final size of the contagion as a function of the fraction of the initial adopters . we find that the low and high - connectivity cases still have different features : in the first case , the global connectivity helps the spread of the contagion while in the second case , high connectivity inhibits the global contagion but once it occurs , it facilitates its spread . finally , we analyze a general percolated threshold model for the diffusion allowing to give different weights to the ( anonymous ) neighbors . our general analysis gives explicit formulas for the spread of the diffusion in terms of the initial condition , the degree sequence of the random graph , and the distribution of the thresholds . it is hoped that this analysis will stimulate applications of our results to other practical cases . one such possibility is the study of financial networks as started in @xcite and @xcite . amini , h. ( 2010 ) . bootstrap percolation and diffusion in random graphs with given vertex degrees . _ 17_(1 ) , research paper 25 , 20 . athreya , k. b. and p. e. ney ( 1972 ) . . new york : springer - verlag . die grundlehren der mathematischen wissenschaften , band 196 . bailey , n. t. j. ( 1975 ) . ( second ed . ) . hafner press [ macmillan publishing co. , inc . ] new york . balogh , j. and b. g. pittel ( 2007 ) . bootstrap percolation on the random regular graph . _ 30_(1 - 2 ) , 257286 . battiston , s. , d. gatti , m. gallegati , b. greenwald , and j. stiglitz ( 2009 ) . blume , l. , d. easley , j. kleinberg , r. kleinberg , and e. tardos ( 2011 ) . in _ focs 2011_. blume , l. e. ( 1993 ) . the statistical mechanics of strategic interaction . _ 5_(3 ) , 387424 . blume , l. e. ( 1995 ) . the statistical mechanics of best - response strategy revision . _ 11_(2 ) , 111145 . evolutionary game theory in biology and economics . bollobs , b. ( 2001 ) . ( second ed . ) , volume 73 of _ cambridge studies in advanced mathematics_. cambridge : cambridge university press . carlson , j. and j. doyle ( 2002 ) . . 99_(suppl 1 ) , 2538 . coupechoux , e. and m. lelarge ( 2011 ) . . netgcoop 2011_. durrett , r. ( 2007 ) . . cambridge : cambridge university press . easley , d. and j. kleinberg ( 2010 ) . . cambridge university press . ellison , g. ( 1993 ) . learning , local interaction , and coordination . _ 61_(5 ) , 10471071 . ellison , g. and d. fudenberg ( 1995 ) . word - of - mouth communication and social learning . _ 110_(1 ) , 93125 . gai , p. and s. kapadia ( 2010 ) . . _ 466_(2120 ) , 2401 . galeotti , a. and s. goyal ( 2009 ) . influencing the influencers : a theory of strategic diffusion . _ 40_(3 ) , 509532 . galeotti , a. , s. goyal , m. o. jackson , and f. vega - redondo ( 2010 ) . network games . _ 77_(1 ) , 218244 . harsanyi , j. c. and r. selten ( 1988 ) . , volume 1 of _ mit press books_. the mit press . jackson , m. o. ( 2008 ) . . princeton , nj , usa : princeton university press . jackson , m. o. and l. yariv ( 2007 ) . diffusion of behavior and equilibrium properties in network games . _ 97_(2 ) . janson , s. ( 2009a ) . on percolation in random graphs with given vertex degrees . _ 14 _ , 86118 . janson , s. ( 2009b ) . the probability that a random multigraph is simple . _ 18_(1 - 2 ) , 205225 . janson , s. and m. j. luczak ( 2007 ) . a simple solution to the @xmath170-core problem . _ 30_(1 - 2 ) , 5062 . janson , s. and m. j. luczak ( 2009 ) . a new approach to the giant component problem . _ 34_(2 ) , 197216 . janson , s. , t. uczak , and a. rucinski ( 2000 ) . . wiley - interscience series in discrete mathematics and optimization . wiley - interscience , new york . kallenberg , o. ( 2002 ) . ( second ed . ) . probability and its applications ( new york ) . new york : springer - verlag . kandori , m. , g. j. mailath , and r. rob ( 1993 ) . learning , mutation , and long run equilibria in games . _ 61_(1 ) , 2956 . kempe , d. , j. kleinberg , and e. tardos ( 2003 ) . maximizing the spread of influence through a social network . in _ proceedings of the ninth acm sigkdd international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining _ , kdd 03 , new york , ny , usa , pp . lelarge , m. ( 2008 ) . diffusion of innovations on random networks : understanding the chasm . in c. h. papadimitriou and s. zhang ( eds . ) , _ wine _ , volume 5385 of _ lecture notes in computer science _ , pp . springer . lelarge , m. ( 2009 ) . efficient control of epidemics over random networks . in j. r. douceur , a. g. greenberg , t. bonald , and j. nieh ( eds . ) , _ sigmetrics / performance _ , pp . lelarge , m. and j. bolot ( 2008 ) . network externalities and the deployment of security features and protocols in the internet . in z. liu , v. misra , and p. j. shenoy ( eds . ) , _ sigmetrics _ , pp . lpez - pintado , d. ( 2008 ) . diffusion in complex social networks . _ 62_(2 ) , 573590 . molloy , m. and b. reed ( 1995 ) . a critical point for random graphs with a given degree sequence . _ 6_(2 - 3 ) , 161179 . montanari , a. and a. saberi ( 2010 ) . . 107_(47 ) , 2019620201 . morris , s. ( 2000 ) . contagion . _ 67_(1 ) , 5778 . newman , m. e. j. ( 2003 ) . the structure and function of complex networks . _ 45_(2 ) , 167256 ( electronic ) . richardson , m. and p. domingos ( 2002 ) . mining knowledge - sharing sites for viral marketing . in _ kdd 02 : proceedings of the eighth acm sigkdd international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining _ , new york , ny , usa , pp . 6170 . acm . vega - redondo , f. ( 2007 ) . , volume 44 of _ econometric society monographs_. cambridge : cambridge university press . watts , d. j. ( 2002 ) . a simple model of global cascades on random networks . _ 99_(9 ) , 57665771 ( electronic ) . young , h. p. ( 1993 ) . the evolution of conventions . _ 61_(1 ) , 5784 . young , h. p. ( 2000 ) . the diffusion of innovations in social networks . economics working paper archive 437 , the johns hopkins university , department of economics . young , h. p. ( 2009 ) . innovation diffusion in heterogeneous populations : contagion , social influence , and social learning . _ 99_(5 ) , 18991924 . this follows from the following observations for @xmath666 : @xmath667 where the @xmath668 s and @xmath258 s are independent bernoulli random variables with parameter @xmath174 and @xmath669 respectively . now we also have : @xmath670 which corresponds exactly to ( [ eq : tec ] ) . the relation is clearly true for @xmath676 . we now assume that @xmath666 and compute the following expression : @xmath677,\end{aligned}\ ] ] where the @xmath668 s and @xmath258 s are independent bernoulli random variables with parameter @xmath174 and @xmath151 respectively and @xmath678 is distributed according to @xmath679 and independent form the @xmath262 s and @xmath258 s . this expression is natural when one consider the branching process approximation of the diffusion described in @xcite section 3.3 . we have : @xmath680 note that @xmath681 for @xmath475 , so that @xmath682 where in the last equality we used the fact that for @xmath683 , we have @xmath684 . now we have @xmath688 so that @xmath689 , where we denote explicitly the dependence in @xmath174 for @xmath690 . the monotonicity of @xmath567 in @xmath174 can be easily seen form ( [ eq : monot ] ) since @xmath691 is strictly decreasing in @xmath174 . we now justify the use of the @xmath314 in ( [ eq : max ] ) . let @xmath261 be a bernoulli random variable with parameter @xmath166 . let for @xmath149 , @xmath150 be the thinning of @xmath84 obtained by taking @xmath84 points and then randomly and independently keeping each of them with probability @xmath151 . thus given @xmath152 , @xmath153 . with these notations , we have @xmath693\\ h_1(z;\boldp,\boldt,\balpha , \pi)&= & { { \mathbb{p}}}\left(\sigma(d)=0,\ : d_{1-\pi+\pi z}\geq d - k(d)\right),\end{aligned}\ ] ] so that both @xmath692 and @xmath694 are non - decreasing in @xmath195 and non - increasing in @xmath174 . note that if @xmath156 , then @xmath695 so that @xmath696 and @xmath697 . we now consider the case @xmath698 , so that there exists @xmath699 such that @xmath700 . in this case , we have @xmath701 . the statement then follows from the fact that the only possible jumps for @xmath702 are downwards . more precisely , let @xmath703 , g(z;\boldp,\boldt,\balpha , \pi)=0\}$ ] . since the function @xmath692 is non - decreasing in @xmath195 , its set of discontinuity points is denumerable say @xmath704 and @xmath692 admits a left and right limit at any point @xmath195 denoted by @xmath705 and @xmath706 respectively . if @xmath707 , then we have @xmath708 . in particular , we have @xmath709 for any @xmath710 which contradicts the fact that @xmath711 . hence the functions @xmath692 and @xmath155 are continuous at @xmath188 and the @xmath712 is attained and can be replaced by a @xmath314 . taking expectation in ( [ eq : rde ] ) , we get with @xmath713 $ ] , @xmath714 note that @xmath681 for @xmath475 , so that @xmath715 hence , we get @xmath716 and the first part of the lemma follows . because we have ( see @xcite ) : @xmath717 taking expectation in ( [ eq : x ] ) gives : @xmath718 = 1-\sum_{s;j\geq s-\ell}(1-\alpha_s)p_st_{s\ell}b_{sj}(1-x\pi)$ ] , and the second part of the lemma follows . Abstract:

Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.

Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered . Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video . Paper: the combinatorial datum that specifies a cluster algebra of geometric type is an extended exchange matrix @xmath2 , which consists of a skew - symmetrizable integer matrix @xmath0 , called an exchange matrix , and some additional rows called the coefficient rows of @xmath2 . certain exchange matrices @xmath0 are associated to tagged triangulations of marked surfaces , as explained in @xcite . in this case , the choice of coefficient rows amounts to choosing a set of laminations in the surface . a lamination is a collection of weighted curves in the surface . the corresponding coefficient row is a vector known as the shear coordinates of the lamination . the notion of laminations predates the notion of cluster algebras . references are found in ( * ? ? ? * sections 1213 ) . given an exchange matrix @xmath0 , we consider the category of cluster algebras of geometric type associated to @xmath0 , with maps given by certain specializations of the coefficients . we follow @xcite in broadening the category of cluster algebras of geometric type to allow infinitely many coefficient rows with not - necessarily integral entries , and then narrowing the definition of coefficient specialization , as compared with the definitions in @xcite . the category also depends on an underlying ring @xmath3 , usually @xmath4 , @xmath5 , or @xmath6 . if this category contains a universal object , the universal object is called the universal geometric cluster algebra for @xmath0 over @xmath3 . universal geometric cluster algebras over @xmath3 are known to exist ( * ? ? ? * corollary 4.7 ) when @xmath3 is a field , but there is no general theorem guaranteeing the existence of universal geometric cluster algebras over @xmath4 . however , the existence of universal geometric cluster algebras over @xmath4 is proved for various @xmath0 in @xcite , and for some additional @xmath0 in this paper , as we explain below . constructing a universal geometric cluster algebra is equivalent to constructing a universal extended exchange matrix over @xmath0 by specifying a collection of coefficient rows , or universal geometric coefficients over @xmath3 . the main theme of @xcite is to make the connection between universal geometric coefficients and the piecewise - linear geometry of a fan @xmath1 , called the mutation fan . the goal of this paper is to construct the mutation fan and universal geometric coefficients in the case of marked surfaces . both constructions involve a variant on laminations that we call quasi - laminations . we show that the fan defined naturally by quasi - laminations equals the rational part of the mutation fan if and only if the surface has a property that we call the curve separation property ( theorem [ rat fb surfaces ] ) . in most cases , the curve separation property is the following : given two incompatible allowable curves ( in the sense of quasi - laminations ) , there exists a tagged triangulation of the surface such that the shear coordinates of the two curves have strictly opposite signs in at least one entry . however , in the case of a once - punctured surface without boundary , the statement of the curve separation property must be altered slightly . ( see definition [ curve sep def ] . ) a long but elementary argument establishes the curve separation property for all marked surfaces except once - punctured surfaces without boundary ( theorem [ curve separation ] ) . we complete the construction ( corollary [ poly grow univ ] ) of universal geometric coefficients ( over @xmath4 or @xmath5 ) for a smaller family of of surfaces . specifically , we show in theorem [ null tangle theorem ] that the shear coordinates of allowable curves ( in the sense of quasi - laminations ) are universal geometric coefficients if and only if the surface has a stronger property called the null tangle property : if a finite collection of weighted curves has the weighted sum of its shear coordinates equal to zero for all tagged triangulations , then all weights are zero . ( once again , the statement of the property must be modified for once - punctured surfaces without boundary . ) we prove the null tangle property in certain cases by extending some of the arguments that establish the curve separation property . specifically , theorem [ poly grow null tangle ] establishes the null tangle property for a disk with at most @xmath7 punctures , for an annulus with at most @xmath8 puncture , and for a sphere with three boundary components and no punctures . it remains open to determine whether once - punctured surfaces without boundary have the curve separation property , and to determine which additional surfaces have the null tangle property . however , in @xcite , we establish the null tangle property ( and thus the curve separation property ) in the simplest case not covered in this paper : the once - punctured torus . this leads to an explicit construction of universal geometric coefficients over @xmath4 , @xmath5 or @xmath6 for the once - punctured torus . in this section , we briefly review the construction of cluster algebras of geometric type , in the broader sense introduced in @xcite . we describe coefficient specialization and characterize the universal objects under specialization , the universal geometric cluster algebras or cluster algebras with universal geometric coefficients . we also present some results from @xcite that are useful in constructing universal geometric coefficients for cluster algebras from surfaces . all of the constructions depend on a choice of an * _ underlying ring _ * @xmath3 . we require that @xmath3 is either the integers @xmath4 or a field containing the rationals @xmath5 as a subfield and contained as a subfield of the real numbers @xmath6 . we are most interested in the cases where @xmath3 is @xmath4 , @xmath5 , or @xmath6 . let @xmath9 be an indexing set of arbitrary cardinality . the usual definition of cluster algebras of geometric type , found in ( * ? * section 2 ) , is recovered from the definition below by taking @xmath10 and @xmath9 finite . for each @xmath11 , let @xmath12 be a formal symbol . let @xmath13 be the set of formal products of the form @xmath14 with each @xmath15 in @xmath3 . this is an abelian group with product @xmath16 and identity @xmath17 . we define an * _ auxiliary addition _ * @xmath18 in @xmath13 by @xmath19 the triple @xmath20 is called a * _ tropical semifield _ * over @xmath3 . the symbols @xmath12 are called * _ tropical variables_*. we also consider @xmath13 as a topological space . it is the product , indexed by @xmath9 , of copies of @xmath3 . we give @xmath3 the discrete topology and give @xmath13 the product topology as a product of copies of the discrete set @xmath3 . details about the product topology may be found , for example , in ( * ? ? ? * chapter 3 ) . see also ( * ? ? ? * section 3 ) . an * _ exchange matrix _ * @xmath0 is a * _ skew - symmetrizable _ * @xmath21 integer matrix . that means that there exist positive integers @xmath22 such that @xmath23 for all @xmath24 $ ] . in this paper , we will work with * _ skew - symmetric _ * exchange matrices , meaning that @xmath25 for all @xmath24 $ ] . ( the notation @xmath26 $ ] stands for the indexing set @xmath27 of @xmath0 . ) an * _ extended exchange matrix _ * is @xmath0 , augmented by an additional collection of * _ coefficient rows _ * , indexed by @xmath9 . each coefficient row is a vector in @xmath28 . if @xmath9 is infinite , then @xmath2 is not a matrix in the usual sense , but it is a collection of entries @xmath29 where @xmath30 is either in @xmath26 $ ] or in @xmath9 and @xmath31 is in @xmath26 $ ] . now set @xmath32 and let @xmath33 be a field of rational functions in @xmath34 independent variables with coefficients in @xmath35 . here @xmath35 is the group ring of the group @xmath36 , ignoring the auxiliary addition @xmath18 . a * _ ( labeled geometric ) seed _ * of rank @xmath34 is a pair @xmath37 such that @xmath38 is an @xmath34-tuple of algebraically independent elements of @xmath33 and @xmath2 is an extended exchange matrix with coefficient rows indexed by @xmath9 . the @xmath34-tuple @xmath39 is called a * _ cluster _ * and the entries of @xmath39 are called * _ cluster variables_*. the seed determines elements @xmath40 of @xmath36 called * _ coefficients_*. given a seed @xmath37 and an index @xmath41 $ ] , we define an new seed @xmath42 . the new cluster @xmath43 has @xmath44 whenever @xmath45 and @xmath46_+}\prod_{i\in i}u_i^{[b_{ik}]_+}+\prod_{i=1}^nx_i^{[-b_{ik}]_+}\prod_{i\in i}u_i^{[-b_{ik}]_+}\right),\ ] ] where @xmath47_+$ ] stands for @xmath48 . the new cluster variable @xmath49 is a rational function in @xmath39 with coefficients in @xmath50 , so that @xmath51 . the new extended exchange matrix @xmath52 is given by @xmath53_+&\mbox{otherwise , } \end{array}\right.\ ] ] where @xmath54 means @xmath55 if @xmath56 or @xmath57 if @xmath58 . since @xmath52 only depends on @xmath2 and @xmath59 , not on @xmath39 , we also write @xmath60 for @xmath52 . for any finite sequence @xmath61 of integers in @xmath26 $ ] , we use @xmath62 for @xmath63 . now let @xmath64 be the @xmath34-regular tree with an edge - labeling by integers @xmath8 through @xmath34 , with each vertex incident to exactly one edge with each label . an edge labeled @xmath59 between vertices @xmath65 and @xmath66 is denoted by @xmath67 . we fix a vertex @xmath68 and define a map @xmath69 from vertices of @xmath64 to seeds by requiring that @xmath70 and that @xmath71 whenever @xmath67 . the map @xmath69 is a * _ cluster pattern _ * and the map @xmath72 is a * _ @xmath73-pattern_*. we write @xmath74 and @xmath75 for the cluster variables and matrix entries of @xmath76 and write @xmath77 for the coefficient @xmath78 . associated to the cluster pattern is a * _ cluster algebra @xmath79 of geometric type _ * , namely the @xmath50-subalgebra of @xmath33 generated by all cluster variables in the cluster pattern . the cluster algebra is determined up to isomorphism by the extended exchange matrix @xmath2 , so we write @xmath80 for @xmath81 . for any permutation @xmath82 of @xmath26 $ ] , applying @xmath82 simultaneously to the entries of @xmath39 , to the rows of @xmath0 , to the columns of @xmath2 and to the edge - labels of @xmath64 induces a canonical isomorphism of cluster patterns and of cluster algebras . in ( * definition 4.1 ) * _ unlabeled seeds _ * are defined as equivalence classes of seeds under these simultaneous permutations . the * _ exchange graph _ * is the graph on unlabeled seeds obtained from the cluster pattern by identifying vertices that have the same _ unlabeled seed_. let @xmath32 and @xmath83 be tropical semifields over the same underlying ring @xmath3 . let @xmath37 and @xmath84 be seeds of rank @xmath34 , with coefficient rows indexed by @xmath9 and @xmath85 respectively . a * _ coefficient specialization _ * is a ring homomorphism @xmath86 such that a. the exchange matrices @xmath0 and @xmath87 coincide ; b. @xmath88 for all @xmath89 $ ] ; c. the restriction of @xmath90 to @xmath36 is a continuous @xmath3-linear map to @xmath91 with @xmath92 and @xmath93 for all @xmath89 $ ] and @xmath94 . continuity here refers to the product topology described above . the cluster algebra @xmath95 has * _ universal geometric coefficients over @xmath3 _ * if the following condition holds : given a cluster algebra @xmath96 with the same initial exchange matrix @xmath0 , there exists a unique coefficient specialization from @xmath97 to @xmath98 . the extended exchange matrix @xmath2 is then said to be * _ universal over @xmath3_*. equation leads to the definition of * _ mutation maps _ * for @xmath0 . for each @xmath41 $ ] , we define a map @xmath99 by setting @xmath100 with @xmath101 equivalently , if @xmath2 is an extended exchange matrix with exchange matrix @xmath0 and @xmath102 is a coefficient row of @xmath2 , then @xmath103 is the corresponding coefficient row of @xmath60 . more generally , the mutation maps associated to @xmath0 are defined as follows . let @xmath104 be a sequence of integers in @xmath26 $ ] , let @xmath105 and define @xmath106 for @xmath107 $ ] . then @xmath108 the map @xmath109 is continuous , piecewise linear , and invertible , with inverse @xmath110 . in particular , it is a homeomorphism from @xmath111 to @xmath111 . it also has the property that @xmath112 given a finite set @xmath113 , vectors @xmath114 in @xmath111 , and elements @xmath115 of @xmath3 , write the formal expression @xmath116 . this expression is a * _ @xmath0-coherent linear relation with coefficients in @xmath3 _ * if the equalities @xmath117 hold for every finite sequence @xmath61 of integers in @xmath26 $ ] . the symbol @xmath118 is the zero vector and @xmath119 refers to componentwise minimum . the equality for the empty sequence @xmath120 implies that a @xmath0-coherent linear relation is also a linear relation in the usual sense . let @xmath9 be some indexing set and let @xmath121 be vectors in @xmath28 . then @xmath121 is an * _ @xmath3-spanning set for @xmath0 _ * if the following condition holds : if @xmath122 , then there exists a finite subset @xmath123 and elements @xmath115 of @xmath3 such that @xmath124 is a @xmath0-coherent linear relation . also , @xmath121 is an * _ @xmath3-independent set for @xmath0 _ * if the following condition holds : if @xmath113 is a finite subset of @xmath9 and @xmath125 is a @xmath0-coherent linear relation with coefficients in @xmath3 , then @xmath126 for all @xmath127 . finally , @xmath121 is an * _ @xmath3-basis _ * for @xmath0 if it is both an @xmath3-independent set for @xmath0 and an @xmath3-spanning set for @xmath0 . the notion of a @xmath3-basis for @xmath0 is analogous to the linear - algebraic notion of a basis , with @xmath0-coherent linear relations replacing the usual linear relations . our interest in @xmath3-bases for @xmath0 arises from the following theorem , which is ( * ? ? ? * theorem 4.4 ) . [ basis univ ] let @xmath2 be an extended exchange matrix with entries in @xmath3 . then @xmath2 is universal over @xmath3 if and only if the coefficient rows of @xmath2 are an @xmath3-basis for @xmath0 . for a description of the unique coefficient specialization from @xmath80 to any other cluster algebra with the same @xmath3 and @xmath0 , see ( * ? ? ? * remark 4.5 ) . the following proposition ( * ? ? ? * proposition 4.6 ) is proved by the usual argument , using zorn s lemma , that any vector space has a ( hamel ) basis . [ basis exists ] suppose the underlying ring @xmath3 is a field . for any exchange matrix @xmath0 , there exists an @xmath3-basis for @xmath0 . given an @xmath3-spanning set @xmath128 for @xmath0 , there exists an @xmath3-basis for @xmath0 contained in @xmath128 . in light of theorem [ basis univ ] and proposition [ basis exists ] , if @xmath3 is a field , then universal geometric coefficients over @xmath3 exist for any @xmath0 . we have no general proof that @xmath4-bases exist , and indeed the second statement of proposition [ basis exists ] can fail for @xmath10 . ( see ( * ? ? ? * remark 4.9 ) . ) however , @xmath4-bases ( and thus universal geometric coefficients over @xmath4 ) are constructed for various exchange matrices @xmath0 in @xcite and later in this paper ( corollary [ poly grow univ ] ) . the following proposition is ( * ? ? ? * proposition 4.11 ) . [ no zero no piecewise ] suppose @xmath0 has no row consisting entirely of zeros . then the formal expression @xmath116 is a @xmath0-coherent linear relation if and only if condition holds for all sequences @xmath120 . a subset of @xmath111 that is closed under addition and positive scaling is a * _ convex cone_*. a * _ simplicial _ * cone is the nonnegative span of a finite set of linearly independent vectors . a * _ rational cone _ * is the nonnegative span of a finite set of rational vectors . a * _ face _ * of a convex cone @xmath129 is a convex subset @xmath130 such that any line segment @xmath131 whose interior intersects @xmath130 has @xmath132 . any face of a convex cone is itself a convex cone . a face of a closed convex cone is closed as well . a collection @xmath133 of closed convex cones is a * _ fan _ * if it has the following two properties : if @xmath134 and @xmath130 is a face of @xmath129 , then @xmath135 ; and the intersection of any two cones in @xmath133 is a face of each of the two . a * _ complete fan _ * is a fan @xmath133 such that the union of the cones in @xmath133 is the entire ambient space . a fan is * _ simplicial _ * if all of its cones are simplicial . a fan is * _ rational _ * if all of its cones are rational . if @xmath136 and @xmath137 are fans and every cone in @xmath137 is a union of cones in @xmath136 , then @xmath136 * _ refines _ * @xmath137 . as before , @xmath54 means @xmath55 if @xmath56 or @xmath57 if @xmath58 . given @xmath138 in @xmath111 , we write @xmath139 for @xmath140 . given @xmath141 , define @xmath142 to mean that @xmath143 for every sequence @xmath120 of integers in @xmath26 $ ] . a @xmath144-equivalence class is a * _ @xmath0-class_*. the closure of a @xmath0-class is a * _ @xmath0-cone_*. each @xmath0-class is a convex cone and each @xmath0-cone is a closed convex cone ( * ? ? ? * proposition 5.4 ) . the * _ mutation fan _ * for @xmath0 is the collection @xmath1 consisting of all @xmath0-cones and all faces of @xmath0-cones . ( faces of @xmath0-cones can fail to be @xmath0-cones . see ( * ? ? ? * remark 5.28 ) . ) the following results are ( * ? ? ? * proposition 5.3 ) , ( * ? ? ? * theorem 5.13 ) , and ( * ? ? ? * proposition 5.26 ) . [ linear ] every mutation map @xmath109 is linear on every @xmath0-cone . [ fan ] the collection @xmath1 is a complete fan . [ int of b - cones ] an arbitrary intersection of @xmath0-cones is a @xmath0-cone . a collection of vectors in @xmath111 is * _ sign - coherent _ * if their @xmath145 coordinates weakly agree in sign , for each @xmath41 $ ] . the following proposition is ( * ? ? ? * proposition 5.30 ) . [ contained bcone ] a set @xmath146 is contained in some @xmath0-cone if and only if the set @xmath147 is sign - coherent for every sequence @xmath120 of indices in @xmath26 $ ] . an @xmath3-basis @xmath121 for @xmath0 is * _ positive _ * if , for any vector @xmath122 , there is a @xmath0-coherent linear relation @xmath124 with each @xmath148 nonnegative . a positive @xmath3-basis seems to be the natural choice for `` the right '' @xmath3-basis for @xmath0 , and this intuition is borne out by the following results , which are ( * ? ? ? * proposition 6.2 ) and ( * ? ? ? * corollary 6.13 ) . note the appearance of @xmath6 in proposition [ pos reals fb ] , rather than @xmath3 . [ positive unique ] for any fixed @xmath3 , there is at most one positive @xmath3-basis for @xmath0 , up to scaling of each basis element by a positive unit in @xmath3 . [ pos reals fb ] if a positive @xmath6-basis for @xmath0 exists , then @xmath1 is simplicial . the basis consists of exactly one vector in each ray of @xmath1 . the following proposition is part of ( * ? ? ? * proposition 6.7 ) . [ positive cone basis ] suppose @xmath121 is an @xmath3-independent set for @xmath0 with the following property : if @xmath129 is a @xmath0-cone , then the nonnegative @xmath3-linear span of @xmath149 contains @xmath150 . then @xmath121 is a positive @xmath3-basis for @xmath0 . in this section , we give background material on cluster algebras arising from triangulated surfaces , following @xcite . [ s m def ] let @xmath151 be a surface obtained from a compact , oriented surface without boundary by deleting a finite collection of disjoint open disks . the boundary of @xmath151 is a finite collection of circles called * _ boundary components _ * , one for each disk removed . let @xmath152 be a nonempty , finite collection of points in @xmath151 called * _ marked points _ * , with at least one marked point in each boundary component . marked points in the interior of @xmath151 are called * _ punctures_*. a curve contained in the boundary of @xmath151 , connecting two points in @xmath152 , with no points of @xmath152 in the interior of the curve , is a * _ boundary segment_*. we exclude unpunctured monogons , digons , and triangles , as well as once - punctured monogons . if @xmath151 is a sphere , then we require that it have at least @xmath153 punctures . in @xcite , the surface @xmath151 is considered to be a riemann surface , but the complex structure is not needed in this paper . [ tri def ] an * _ arc _ * in @xmath154 is a curve in @xmath151 , up to isotopy relative to @xmath152 , whose endpoints are points in @xmath152 . we require that the arc not intersect itself , except that its endpoints may coincide , and that the arc is disjoint from @xmath152 and from the boundary of @xmath151 , except at its endpoints . we also exclude arcs that bound an unpunctured monogon and arcs that , together with a boundary segment connecting the endpoints , define an unpunctured digon . two arcs @xmath155 and @xmath156 are * _ incompatible _ * if they intersect in @xmath157 , and if the intersection can not be removed by ( independently ) isotopically deforming the arcs . otherwise , they are * _ compatible_*. a * _ triangulation _ * is a maximal collection of distinct pairwise compatible arcs . the exclusion of certain pairs @xmath154 in definition [ s m def ] assures that @xmath154 admits at least two triangulations . the arcs defining an triangulation divide @xmath151 into * _ triangles _ * , which have @xmath8 , @xmath7 , or @xmath158 distinct vertices and @xmath7 or @xmath158 distinct sides . ( in @xcite , the terms * _ ideal triangles _ * and * _ ideal triangulations _ * are used because the marked points lie at infinity in the complex structure . ) a * _ self - folded triangle _ * is a triangle with 2 distinct sides . ( for example , later in figure [ shear self - folded fig ] , one of the two triangles shown in each picture is self - folded . ) an arc in a triangulation is an edge of exactly two triangles in the triangulation unless it constitutes two sides of a self - folded triangle . removing the arc from the triangulation leaves a quadrilateral region , which can be completed to two triangles by either one of the diagonals of the quadrilateral . a * _ flip _ * is the operation of removing an arc from a triangulation and forming a new triangulation by inserting the other diagonal of the quadrilateral . [ tagged tri def ] a * _ tagged arc _ * in @xmath154 is a arc in @xmath151 that does not cut out a once - punctured monogon , with each end of the arc designated ( or `` tagged '' ) either * _ plain _ * or * _ notched_*. an endpoint on a boundary component must be tagged plain , and if the endpoints of an arc coincide , then they must have the same tag . two tagged arcs are * _ compatible _ * if one of the following conditions holds : the two underlying untagged arcs are distinct ( i.e. non - isotopic ) and compatible and any shared endpoints have the same tagging , or the two underlying untagged arcs are the same and their tagging agrees on one endpoint but not the other . a * _ tagged triangulation _ * is a maximal collection of distinct pairwise compatible tagged arcs . there is a map @xmath159 from ordinary arcs to tagged arcs , defined as follows : if an arc @xmath156 does not bound a once - punctured monogon , then @xmath160 is the same curve , with both endpoints tagged plain . if @xmath156 has both endpoints at @xmath161 , and bounds a once - punctured monogon with puncture @xmath162 , then @xmath160 is the arc , in the monogon , from @xmath163 to @xmath164 , tagged plain at @xmath163 and notched at @xmath164 . starting with a triangulation , and applying @xmath159 to each arc , we obtain a tagged triangulation . as an example of the map @xmath159 , consider the triangulation @xmath165 of a punctured digon shown in the left picture of figure [ tau fig ] . one arc defining @xmath165 connects a marked point on the boundary to the puncture , and the other arc ( in purple or light gray ) encloses the puncture . the right picture of the figure shows the tagged triangulation @xmath166 . [ complex and flips ] the tagged triangulations are the maximal simplices of a simplicial complex called the * _ tagged arc complex_*. this is the complex whose vertices are the tagged arcs , with a set of arcs defining a face if and only if they are pairwise compatible . all tagged triangulations of @xmath154 have the same number of tagged arcs . ( see ( * ? ? ? * proposition 2.10 ) . ) given a tagged triangulation @xmath165 and a particular tagged arc @xmath156 in @xmath165 , there is a unique tagged triangulation @xmath167 such that @xmath168 and @xmath169 . the tagged triangulations @xmath165 and @xmath167 are said to be related by a * _ tagged flip _ * , or more specifically , @xmath167 is obtained from @xmath165 by a flip at @xmath156 . an exact combinatorial description of tagged flips is found in ( * ? ? ? * remark 5.13 ) . the dual graph to the tagged arc complex is the graph whose vertices are tagged triangulations and whose edges are pairs of triangulations related by a tagged flip . this dual graph is connected ( * ? ? ? * proposition 7.10 ) , except when @xmath151 has no boundary components and exactly one puncture . in the latter case , the dual graph of the tagged arc complex has exactly two connected components , one consisting of triangulations with all arcs tagged plain , and the other consisting of triangulations with all arcs tagged notched . the two components are related by the symmetry of reversing all taggings ( plain@xmath170notched ) . given a tagged triangulation @xmath165 , there is a simple recipe ( * ? ? ? * definition 5.15 ) for writing down an exchange matrix @xmath171 , called the * _ signed adjacency matrix _ * of @xmath165 . this is an @xmath21 matrix whose rows and columns are indexed by the tagged arcs @xmath156 in @xmath165 . we do not need the details of this definition . rather , what is important for us are some observations and results of @xcite . first , @xmath171 is skew - symmetric , rather than merely skew - symmetrizable . next , @xmath171 does not have a row or column consisting of all zeros . finally , we quote very small parts of ( * ? ? ? * theorem 6.1 ) and ( * ? ? ? * corollary 6.2 ) . [ signed adjacency mut ] if @xmath165 and @xmath167 are tagged triangulations such that @xmath167 is obtained from @xmath165 by a flip at an arc @xmath156 , then @xmath172 is obtained from @xmath171 by matrix mutation at the position indexed by @xmath156 . [ cluster main ] let @xmath97 be a cluster algebra with initial exchange matrix @xmath171 and arbitrary coefficients . then the exchange graph of @xmath97 is isomorphic to the dual graph of the tagged arc complex , or , if @xmath151 has no boundary components and exactly one puncture , the connected component of the dual graph consisting of tagged triangulations with all arcs tagged plain . [ lam def ] an * _ integral ( unbounded measured ) lamination _ * is a collection of pairwise non - intersecting curves in @xmath151 , up to isotopy relative to @xmath152 . we take the curves to be distinct up to isotopy , but each curve @xmath173 appears with a positive integer weight @xmath174 . each curve must be * a closed curve , * a curve whose two endpoints are unmarked boundary points , * a curve having one endpoint an unmarked boundary point , with the other end spiraling ( clockwise or counterclockwise ) into a puncture , or * a curve spiraling into ( not necessarily distinct ) punctures at both ends . however , we exclude * curves with self - intersections , * curves that are contractible in @xmath157 , * curves that are contractible to a puncture , and * curves having two endpoints on the boundary and being contractible to a portion of the boundary containing zero or one marked points . when a curve spirals into a puncture , that puncture is a * _ spiral point _ * of the curve . a * _ rational ( unbounded measured ) lamination _ * is defined in the same way , but with positive rational weights rather than positive integer weights . [ shear def ] given a lamination @xmath175 and a tagged triangulation @xmath165 , the * _ shear coordinate vector _ * is a vector @xmath176 indexed by arcs @xmath156 in @xmath165 . the entry @xmath177 is defined as follows . we deal with each curve @xmath178 separately and set @xmath179 where @xmath174 is the weight of @xmath173 in @xmath175 and where @xmath180 is a quantity that we now define . first , everywhere there is a puncture @xmath181 incident only to notched ends of arcs , change all of these notched ends to plain ends and reverse the direction of any spirals of @xmath173 at @xmath181 . we obtain an altered tagged triangulation with no notched endpoints on arcs , except that at some points @xmath164 there are two tagged arcs , whose underlying untagged arcs are the same , one tagged plain and one tagged notched at @xmath164 . if @xmath156 is one of these arcs for some @xmath164 , then if necessary we switch notched ends with plain ends and reverse any spirals of @xmath173 at @xmath164 so that @xmath156 becomes an arc with one end notched . call the altered tagged triangulation @xmath167 and call the curve with some spirals possibly reversed @xmath182 . define @xmath180 to be @xmath183 , calculated as follows . there is a triangulation @xmath184 with @xmath185 . re - use the name @xmath156 for the arc in @xmath184 corresponding to @xmath186 . because of how we defined @xmath167 , the arc @xmath156 is contained in two distinct triangles of @xmath184 ( rather than defining two edges of the same self - folded triangle ) . choose an isotopy deformation of @xmath182 ( reusing the symbol @xmath182 for this deformation ) so as to minimize the number of intersection points of @xmath182 with @xmath156 . then @xmath183 is the sum , over each intersection of @xmath182 with @xmath156 , of a number in @xmath187 . the number is @xmath57 unless @xmath182 intersects the two triangles containing @xmath156 as shown in figure [ shear fig ] , in which case it is @xmath8 or @xmath188 as shown . in both pictures , the arc @xmath156 is the diagonal of the square and the curve @xmath182 is the vertical or horizonal line intersecting the square . figure [ shear fig ] introduces a color convention that we maintain throughout the paper . when calculating a shear coordinate at @xmath156 , we color @xmath156 purple and color the other edges red and blue so that , traveling clockwise along each triangle , we meet the colors in the order red , blue , purple . those reading the paper in grayscale may have some difficulty in distinguishing the arcs ; it may be helpful to know that the blue arcs become a darker gray than the red arcs and the purple arcs are lightest of all . we also shade the interiors of the red - blue - purple triangles with a light purple . the quadrilaterals represented in figure [ shear fig ] might have fewer than @xmath153 distinct vertices and @xmath153 distinct sides . many examples appear later on . the first example occurs in figure [ shear self - folded fig ] , which illustrates shear coordinates in the case where one of the two triangles in figure [ shear fig ] is self - folded . although a red and blue edge coincide , we show both colors for clarity , putting the colors on the appropriate sides to make the connection to figure [ shear fig ] . the following are ( part of ) ( * ? ? ? * theorem 13.5 ) and ( * ? ? ? * theorem 13.6 ) . [ mut lam ] fix a lamination @xmath175 . if @xmath165 and @xmath167 are tagged triangulations such that @xmath167 is obtained from @xmath165 by a flip at an arc @xmath156 , then @xmath189 , where @xmath190 is the mutation map at the index for the arc @xmath156 in @xmath165 . [ lam bij ] fix a tagged triangulation @xmath165 . then the map @xmath191 is a bijection between integral ( resp . rational ) unbounded measured laminations and @xmath192 ( resp . @xmath193 ) . theorem [ mut lam ] suggests the idea of constructing the mutation fan @xmath1 and a basis for @xmath0 in terms of laminations . in turns out that unbounded measured laminations are almost , but not quite , the right tool . in this section , we develop the right tool , which we call quasi - laminations . we also define the curve separation property , a property of @xmath154 that allows us to construct the rational part of the mutation fan in the context of quasi - laminations . in section [ curve separation sec ] , we establish the curve separation property for all marked surfaces except those with no boundary components and exactly one puncture . [ quasi lam def ] a curve in @xmath151 is * _ allowable _ * if it satisfies the requirements placed on curves in definition [ lam def ] and is not one of the following : * a curve that has both endpoints on the same boundary segment and that , together with the portion of the boundary between its endpoints , cuts out a once - punctured disk , and * a curve with two coinciding spiral points that cuts out a once - punctured disk . figure [ exclude curves ] illustrates these two excluded curves . two allowable curves are * _ compatible _ * if they are non - intersecting , or if they are identical except that , at one ( and only one ) end of the curve , they spiral opposite directions into the same point . figure [ allow intersect ] illustrates the allowed intersections between compatible curves . one curve is drawn black and the other is dotted and green . an * _ integral quasi - lamination _ * is a collection of pairwise compatible allowable curves with positive integer weights . a * _ rational quasi - lamination _ * is a collection of pairwise compatible allowable curves with positive rational weights . [ quasi - shear def ] let @xmath165 be a tagged triangulation , let @xmath156 be a tagged arc in @xmath165 and let @xmath175 be a quasi - lamination . then the shear coordinates @xmath194 are defined as a weighted sum of shear coordinates @xmath195 of the individual curves @xmath173 in @xmath175 , just as in definition [ shear def ] . we should think of the definition of quasi - laminations as a harmless modification of the definition of laminations . indeed , given a rational unbounded measured lamination , one can replace all curves of the type illustrated in figure [ exclude curves ] with pairs of intersecting but compatible curves of the corresponding type shown in figure [ allow intersect ] . ( if some curve @xmath173 appears twice in the result , we replace the two copies of @xmath173 with a single copy of @xmath173 whose weight is the sum of the original two weights . ) this is a bijection , preserving integrality and shear coordinates , between rational unbounded measured laminations and quasi - laminations . the following theorems are now immediate from theorems [ mut lam ] and [ lam bij ] . [ mut q - lam ] fix a quasi - lamination @xmath175 . if @xmath165 and @xmath167 are tagged triangulations such that @xmath167 is obtained from @xmath165 by a flip at an arc @xmath156 , then @xmath189 , where @xmath190 is the mutation map at the index for the arc @xmath156 in @xmath165 . [ q - lam bij ] fix a tagged triangulation @xmath165 . then the map @xmath191 is a bijection between integral ( resp . rational ) quasi - laminations and @xmath192 ( resp . @xmath193 ) . in order for us to understand the mutation fan in terms of quasi - laminations , the surface must have the following key property . [ curve sep def ] a marked surface @xmath154 has the * _ curve separation property _ * if for any incompatible allowable curves @xmath173 and @xmath196 , there exists a tagged triangulation @xmath165 ( with all arcs tagged plain if @xmath154 has no boundary components and exactly one puncture ) and an arc @xmath156 in @xmath165 such that the integers @xmath180 and @xmath197 have strictly opposite signs . definition [ curve sep def ] defines the curve separation property entirely in the context of the geometry of @xmath154 . we now rephrase the property in terms of the mutation fan : curves are incompatible exactly when they are separated in the mutation fan . [ fbt compatible ] suppose @xmath154 satisfies the curve separation property , let @xmath165 be any tagged triangulation of @xmath154 ( with all arcs tagged plain if @xmath154 has no boundary components and exactly one puncture ) , and @xmath198 be a set of allowable curves . then the curves in @xmath198 are pairwise compatible if and only if the vectors @xmath199 are contained in some @xmath171-cone . suppose @xmath173 and @xmath196 are not compatible . then the curve separation property says that there exists a tagged triangulation @xmath167 ( with all arcs tagged plain if @xmath154 has no boundary components and exactly one puncture ) and an arc @xmath156 in @xmath167 such that the integers @xmath200 and @xmath201 have strictly opposite signs . then @xmath167 is obtained from @xmath165 by a sequence of flips , so theorem [ mut q - lam ] implies that @xmath202 and @xmath203 are obtained by applying some mutation map to @xmath195 and @xmath204 . by proposition [ contained bcone ] , @xmath195 and @xmath204 are not contained in any common @xmath171-cone . conversely , let @xmath173 and @xmath196 be compatible , allowable curves and let @xmath156 be a tagged arc in a tagged triangulation @xmath167 . we will show that @xmath200 and @xmath201 weakly agree in sign . as in definition [ shear def ] , removing tags and switching spirals on @xmath173 and @xmath196 , we pass from @xmath167 to a triangulation @xmath184 where @xmath156 is contained in two distinct triangles . let @xmath205 be the interior of the quadrilateral that is the union of these two triangles . we refer to figure [ shear fig ] , where @xmath156 is represented by a purple arc and where @xmath205 is shaded light purple . ( possibly some of the edges or vertices of @xmath205 are identified with each other . ) we see that @xmath180 and @xmath197 do not have opposite signs unless @xmath173 and @xmath196 intersect , so suppose they intersect . since @xmath173 and @xmath196 are compatible , they are identical except at one end , where they spiral opposite ways into a puncture @xmath181 . consider the connected components of @xmath206 and the connected components of @xmath207 . since @xmath173 and @xmath196 are identical except where they spiral opposite ways into @xmath181 , each connected component of @xmath206 corresponds to a connected component of @xmath207 that intersects @xmath205 in the same way , with _ one possible exception _ : if @xmath181 is a vertex of the quadrilateral , there may be one connected component @xmath182 of @xmath206 that disagrees with the corresponding component @xmath208 of @xmath207 . but this disagreement can only be slight : orienting @xmath173 towards @xmath181 , the component @xmath182 enters @xmath205 through some edge of the quadrilateral and leaves @xmath205 through some other edge . orienting @xmath196 towards @xmath181 as well , the component @xmath208 enters @xmath205 through the same edge as @xmath182 does . thus it is impossible for @xmath182 and @xmath208 to contribute of strictly opposite signs to the shear coordinates of @xmath173 and @xmath196 . if either of them ( say @xmath182 ) makes a nonzero contribution @xmath209 , then since @xmath173 is not self - intersecting , all components of @xmath206 make contributions weakly agreeing in sign with @xmath209 . therefore also all components of @xmath207 make contributions weakly agreeing in sign with @xmath209 , so @xmath200 and @xmath201 weakly agree in sign . now if @xmath198 is a set of pairwise compatible curves , then @xmath200 and @xmath201 weakly agree in sign for any pair @xmath210 . therefore , @xmath211 all weakly agree in sign for any @xmath167 . by theorem [ mut q - lam ] , applying any mutation map @xmath212 to @xmath199 produces a sign - coherent set of vectors . proposition [ contained bcone ] says that @xmath199 is contained in some @xmath171-cone . [ all arcs tagged plain ] the requirement that all arcs be tagged plain if @xmath154 has no boundary components and exactly one puncture in definition [ curve sep def ] , in proposition [ fbt compatible ] , and in what follows arises from the fact that the tagged arc complex has two connected components in this case . ( see definition [ complex and flips ] . ) the requirement is crucial in the proof of one direction of proposition [ fbt compatible ] , where it ensures that the tagged triangulations @xmath165 and @xmath167 are related by a sequence of flips . this requirement is also the reason that , in section [ curve separation sec ] , we are not able to establish the curve separation property for @xmath154 having no boundary components and exactly one puncture . we now define a rational fan @xmath213 , based on quasi - laminations , which is closely related to the mutation fan @xmath214 . specifically , @xmath213 is the rational part of @xmath214 , in a sense that we make precise below . [ rat q - lam fan def ] fix a tagged triangulation @xmath165 . let @xmath198 be a set of pairwise compatible allowable curves in the sense of definition [ quasi lam def ] . let @xmath215 be the nonnegative @xmath6-linear span of the integer vectors @xmath199 . let @xmath213 be the collection of all such cones @xmath215 . we call @xmath213 the * _ rational quasi - lamination fan _ * for @xmath165 and justify the name below in theorem [ rat fb surfaces ] . the following is a specialization of ( * ? ? ? * definition 6.9 ) . [ rat part def ] suppose @xmath133 and @xmath216 are fans such that : a. [ rat cones rat part ] @xmath216 is a rational fan . b. [ cone in cone rat part ] each cone in @xmath216 is contained in a cone of @xmath133 . c. [ max cone rat part ] for each cone @xmath129 of @xmath133 , there is a unique largest cone ( under containment ) among cones of @xmath216 contained in @xmath129 . this largest cone contains @xmath217 . then @xmath216 is called the * _ rational part _ * of @xmath133 . if the rational part of @xmath133 exists , then it is unique . [ rat fb surfaces ] let @xmath165 be any tagged triangulation of @xmath154 ( with all arcs tagged plain if @xmath154 has no boundary components and exactly one puncture ) . the collection @xmath213 is a rational , simplicial fan . the fan @xmath213 is the rational part of @xmath214 if and only if @xmath154 has the curve separation property . suppose that some cone @xmath215 is not simplicial . then there is some rational point in @xmath215 that can be written as a @xmath5-linear combination of the vectors @xmath218 in two distinct ways . this point is thus obtained as the shear coordinates of two distinct rational quasi - laminations , contradicting theorem [ q - lam bij ] . let @xmath215 and @xmath219 be cones in @xmath213 . then @xmath220 contains @xmath221 . suppose @xmath222 is a rational vector in @xmath220 . then @xmath222 is the shear coordinates of some quasi - lamination supported on a set @xmath223 of compatible curves . by theorem [ q - lam bij ] , we conclude that @xmath223 is contained in both @xmath198 and @xmath224 . thus @xmath225 . since @xmath220 is a rational cone , @xmath226 , so that @xmath227 we have shown that @xmath213 is a simplicial fan , and it is rational by construction . if @xmath154 does not have the curve separation property , then theorem [ mut q - lam ] and proposition [ contained bcone ] imply that there exist incompatible allowable curves @xmath173 and @xmath196 with @xmath195 and @xmath204 contained in some @xmath0-cone @xmath129 . but @xmath195 and @xmath204 both span rays of @xmath213 not contained in a common cone of @xmath213 . thus @xmath213 fails condition of definition [ rat part def ] . now suppose @xmath154 has the curve separation property . condition of definition [ rat part def ] holds by proposition [ fbt compatible ] . we now establish condition of definition [ rat part def ] . given a @xmath171-cone @xmath129 , let @xmath198 be the set of allowable curves @xmath173 whose shear coordinates @xmath195 are contained in @xmath129 . proposition [ fbt compatible ] implies that @xmath215 is the unique largest cone among cones of @xmath213 contained in @xmath129 . it remains to show that this @xmath215 contains every rational point in @xmath129 . we argue by induction on the dimension of @xmath129 . the assertion is trivial when @xmath129 is the zero cone . suppose @xmath228 is in @xmath217 . then @xmath228 is the shear coordinates of some rational quasi - lamination by theorem [ q - lam bij ] . the shear coordinates of the individual curves in this quasi - lamination span a cone @xmath229 in @xmath213 . the cone @xmath229 is contained in some @xmath171-cone @xmath230 . if @xmath231 , then @xmath229 is contained in the largest cone @xmath232 of @xmath213 in @xmath129 . otherwise , @xmath233 , which is a @xmath171-cone by proposition [ int of b - cones ] , and whose dimension is lower than the dimension of @xmath129 . let @xmath234 be the largest cone of @xmath213 contained in @xmath235 . by induction , @xmath236 . but now @xmath234 is contained in the largest cone @xmath232 of @xmath213 in @xmath129 . in either case , @xmath228 is in @xmath215 . more generally than definition [ rat part def ] , ( * ? ? ? * definition 6.9 ) defines the @xmath3-part of a fan for an underlying ring @xmath3 , and ( * ? ? ? * proposition 6.10 ) establishes several facts about the @xmath3-part of a fan . the following corollary is obtained from ( * ? ? ? * proposition 6.10 ) by setting @xmath237 and appealing to theorem [ rat fb surfaces ] . [ r part prop ] suppose @xmath154 has the curve separation property . let @xmath165 be any tagged triangulation of @xmath154 ( with all arcs tagged plain if @xmath154 has no boundary components and exactly one puncture ) . each rational @xmath171-cone is a cone in @xmath213 . the full - dimensional @xmath0-cones are exactly the full - dimensional cones in @xmath213 . the curve separation property has important consequences for finding positive @xmath4- and @xmath5-bases for @xmath171 . [ curves pos basis ] suppose @xmath154 has the curve separation property . let @xmath3 be @xmath4 or @xmath5 and fix a tagged triangulation @xmath165 ( with all arcs tagged plain if @xmath154 has no boundary components and exactly one puncture ) . 1 . [ indep allowable ] if shear coordinates @xmath195 of allowable curves @xmath173 form an @xmath3-independent set for @xmath171 , then they form a positive @xmath3-basis for @xmath171 . [ basis allowable ] if a positive @xmath3-basis exists for @xmath171 , then the shear coordinates of allowable curves are a positive @xmath3-basis . to prove theorem [ curves pos basis ] , we use the following specialization of ( * ? ? ? * corollary 6.12 ) . the first part of proposition [ fb basis ray ] as stated in ( * ? ? ? * corollary 6.12 ) refers to the @xmath4-part ( as in ( * ? ? ? * definition 6.9 ) ) , not the rational part , but these two fans coincide . [ fb basis ray ] if a positive @xmath4-basis exists for @xmath0 , then the unique positive @xmath4-basis for @xmath0 consists of the smallest nonzero integer vector in each ray of the rational part of @xmath1 . if a positive @xmath5-basis exists for @xmath0 , then a collection of vectors is a positive @xmath5-basis for @xmath0 if and only if it consists of exactly one nonzero vector in each ray of the rational part of @xmath1 . for assertion , we verify the hypothesis of of proposition [ positive cone basis ] . suppose @xmath129 is a @xmath171-cone . by theorem [ rat fb surfaces ] , there is largest cone @xmath229 among cones of @xmath213 contained in @xmath129 and @xmath229 contains every point in @xmath150 . this verifies the hypothesis of proposition [ positive cone basis ] for @xmath237 . the hypothesis for @xmath10 follows by the integer case of theorem [ q - lam bij ] . assertion is an immediate consequence of theorem [ rat fb surfaces ] and proposition [ fb basis ray ] . ( theorem [ q - lam bij ] implies that the shear coordinate vector of an allowable curve is the shortest integer vector in the ray it spans . ) [ affine a2 surface ] consider an annulus with two marked points on its outer boundary and one marked point on its inner boundary . the surface admits a triangulation with three arcs , for example as shown in figure [ a2annulus ] . if @xmath165 is the triangulation shown , then @xmath171 is the matrix @xmath2380&1&1\\-1&0&1\\-1&-1&\hspace{6pt}0\\\end{bsmallmatrix*}$ ] . some allowable curves in the surface are shown ( green and dotted ) in figure [ a2annuluscurves ] . [ cols="^,^,^,^,^,^,^ " , ] all remaining allowable curves are related to the curves @xmath239 , @xmath240 , @xmath241 , and @xmath242 as we now explain . since each @xmath243 connects the inner boundary of the annulus to the outer boundary , we can modify @xmath173 by inserting spirals . specifically , for each @xmath244 , let @xmath245 be obtained from @xmath173 by tracing along @xmath173 from the inner boundary , inserting @xmath34 counterclockwise outward spirals , and then continuing along @xmath173 to the outer boundary . by convention , @xmath246 and if @xmath247 then @xmath245 is obtained from @xmath173 by inserting @xmath248 _ clockwise _ outward spirals . the curve @xmath249 is illustrated in figure [ a2annuluscurvespiral ] . keeping in mind that allowable curves are considered up to isotopy in @xmath151 relative to @xmath152 , one verifies that @xmath250 , that @xmath251 , that @xmath252 , and that @xmath253 . the set of all allowable curves is @xmath254 for @xmath255 , let @xmath256 be the shear coordinates of @xmath257 with respect to the triangulation shown in figure [ a2annulus ] . these shear coordinates are also indicated in figure [ a2annuluscurves ] . the shear coordinates of @xmath258 for @xmath259 are @xmath260 the shear coordinates of @xmath261 for n@xmath262 are @xmath263 , and similar descriptions hold for shear coordinates of @xmath264 and @xmath265 . the set of all shear coordinates of allowable curves consists of four infinite families @xmath266 for @xmath267 together with the vectors @xmath268 , @xmath269 , and @xmath270 . we will see in theorem [ curve separation ] that this surface has the curve separation property . thus theorem [ rat fb surfaces ] says that @xmath213 is the rational part of @xmath1 . in fact , @xmath213 is complete in this case , so it coincides with @xmath214 . the shear coordinates of allowable curves span the rays of @xmath1 , and the other faces of @xmath1 are spanned by sets of pairwise compatible allowable curves . the fan @xmath1 is depicted in figure [ fb a fig ] in the following way : ( 0,0)(135,-164 ) ( -69,98)@xmath271 ( -2.5,28.5)@xmath272 ( -38,8)@xmath273 ( -67,-102)@xmath274 ( 48,31)@xmath268 ( -5.5,-64.5)@xmath269 the intersection of a nonzero cone of @xmath1 with a unit sphere about the origin is a point , circular arc , or spherical triangle . the figure shows the stereographic projection of these points , arcs , and triangles . ( the vector @xmath275 $ ] projects to the origin of the plane . ) the ray for @xmath270 is not labeled but is marked as a green dot that appears as a limit of four sequences of red dots . with two exceptions , each @xmath7-dimensional face of @xmath1 is contained in exactly two @xmath158-dimensional faces of @xmath1 . the exceptions are the face spanned by @xmath268 and @xmath270 and the face spanned by @xmath269 and @xmath270 . in this section , as an aside , we further justify our interest in quasi - laminations by using results of @xcite to connect shear coordinates of allowable curves and @xmath276-vectors of cluster variables . given a tagged arc @xmath155 in @xmath154 , we define ( up to isotopy ) a curve @xmath277 . the curve @xmath277 coincides with @xmath155 except within a small ball around the endpoints of @xmath155 . within each ball around an endpoint @xmath181 , the behavior of @xmath277 is as follows : if @xmath181 is on a boundary component , then @xmath277 ends at a point @xmath278 on the same boundary component such the path along the boundary from @xmath181 to @xmath278 , keeping @xmath151 on the left , does not leave the small ball . if @xmath181 is a puncture , then @xmath277 spirals into @xmath181 , clockwise if @xmath155 is tagged plain at @xmath181 and counterclockwise if @xmath155 is tagged notched at @xmath181 . the map @xmath279 is similar to the map considered in ( * ? ? ? * definition 17.2 ) , but with the opposite orientation throughout . the following lemma is immediate . [ kappa lemma ] the map @xmath279 from tagged arcs to allowable curves is one - to - one and is surjective onto the set of allowable curves that are not closed . two arcs @xmath155 and @xmath156 are compatible if and only if the curves @xmath277 and @xmath280 are compatible . let @xmath165 be a tagged triangulation of @xmath154 . part of ( * ? ? ? * theorem 15.6 ) is a bijection between the tagged arcs in @xmath154 and the cluster variables of a cluster algebra with initial exchange matrix @xmath171 . ( if @xmath154 has exactly one puncture and no boundary components , then we assume @xmath165 has all tags plain and restrict the map to plain - tagged arcs . ) we write @xmath281 for this bijection , but we do not need the details of the map . rather , it is enough to know that tagged triangulations map to clusters . for a suitable choice of coefficients , each cluster variable @xmath282 has a @xmath276-vector of @xmath283 . this is an integer vector with entries indexed by the tagged arcs in @xmath165 , via the bijection between tagged arcs in @xmath165 and cluster variables in the initial cluster . for the definition of @xmath276-vectors , see ( * * section 6 ) . [ g surfaces ] fix a tagged triangulation @xmath165 and let @xmath155 be a tagged arc , not necessarily in @xmath165 . ( if @xmath154 has exactly one puncture and no boundary components , then take all tags on @xmath165 and on @xmath155 to be plain . ) then @xmath283 equals @xmath284 . the proof of proposition [ g surfaces ] revolves around the following weak version of ( * ? ? ? * conjecture 7.12 ) . [ gvec mu ] let @xmath285 be an edge in @xmath64 and let @xmath286 and @xmath287 be exchange matrices such that @xmath288 . for any @xmath94 and @xmath289 $ ] , the @xmath276-vectors @xmath290 and @xmath291 are related by @xmath292 , where @xmath293 is the transpose of @xmath286 . concatenating results of @xcite , as explained in ( * ? ? ? * remark 8.14 ) , we see that conjecture [ gvec mu ] is true whenever @xmath286 and @xmath287 are skew - symmetric , and in particular for exchange matrices arising from surfaces . furthermore , by skew - symmetry , we rewrite the assertion of conjecture [ gvec mu ] as @xmath294 , and then use to further rewrite the assertion as @xmath295 , for exchange matrices @xmath286 and @xmath287 related by mutation at position @xmath59 . alternately , let @xmath167 obtained from @xmath165 by a flip of the arc @xmath156 and let @xmath155 be any arc . then @xmath296 , where @xmath190 is the mutation map at the index for the arc @xmath156 in @xmath165 . on the other hand , suppose @xmath173 is an allowable curve . theorem [ mut q - lam ] says that the vector @xmath202 is @xmath297 , where @xmath190 is the mutation map at the index for the arc @xmath156 in @xmath165 . setting @xmath298 , we see that vectors @xmath299 and @xmath300 satisfy the same recurrence . when @xmath155 is an arc in @xmath165 , the vector @xmath300 has @xmath188 in the position indexed by @xmath155 and @xmath57 elsewhere . in this case , @xmath282 is the cluster variable indexed by @xmath155 in the initial cluster , so @xmath301 also has @xmath188 in the position indexed by @xmath155 and @xmath57 elsewhere . this completes the proof of proposition [ g surfaces ] . in this section , we prove the following theorem . [ curve separation ] if @xmath154 has one or more boundary components or if @xmath154 has two or more punctures , then @xmath154 has the curve separation property . the hypotheses rule out the case where @xmath154 has no boundary components and exactly one puncture . see remarks [ all arcs tagged plain ] and [ the missing case ] . as mentioned in the introduction , one additional case of the curve separation property is established in @xcite . to prove theorem [ curve separation ] , we take incompatible allowable curves @xmath173 and @xmath196 and construct a tagged triangulation @xmath165 and a tagged arc @xmath186 such that the shear coordinates @xmath180 and @xmath197 have strictly opposite signs . an allowable curve @xmath173 may intersect @xmath156 many times , but since @xmath173 may not intersect itself , all nonzero contributions to @xmath180 from these intersections have the same sign . thus to prove that @xmath180 and @xmath197 have strictly opposite signs , it is enough to find one intersection of @xmath173 with @xmath156 and one intersection of @xmath196 with @xmath156 that contribute opposite signs to @xmath180 and @xmath197 . we consider many cases . in most cases we construct , instead of a tagged triangulation @xmath165 , a triangulation @xmath184 . in these cases , we tacitly take @xmath165 to be the tagged triangulation @xmath302 . ( see definition [ tagged tri def ] . ) we avoid restating the conclusion ( that the shear coordinates @xmath180 and @xmath197 have strictly opposite signs ) in every case . in each case , part of the triangulation @xmath165 or @xmath184 is illustrated in a figure . to make the figures as clear as possible , we continue the convention on red , blue , and purple arcs and light - purple shading , established in definition [ shear def ] . the arc @xmath156 is always drawn in purple . arcs that are not used to calculate shear coordinates at @xmath156 are gray . the curve @xmath173 is solid and black , while @xmath196 , when it appears , is dotted and green . marked points are numbered as necessary . we shade areas outside of @xmath151 ( i.e. beyond the boundary ) with a dark gray . since our figures are confined to the ( topologically uncomplicated ) screen or page , we often need to indicate that certain loops are not contractible , even though on the page they appear to be contractible . to do so , we shade the inside of the loop with a light gray striped pattern . the figures show certain points and arcs as distinct when they might possibly coincide . when necessary , the proof considers the possible coincidences . in ruling out certain coincidences , it is important to remember that @xmath151 is an _ oriented _ surface . some arcs making up @xmath165 or @xmath184 are constructed by * _ following closely _ * along existing curves . this is meant as a technical term : a curve follows another closely if there are no punctures or boundary components between them . the point is to be certain that the arcs constructed do indeed bound triangles . in the figures , one might draw a curve tightly next to another curve to indicate that it follows closely . however , to aid legibility , in many cases we have straightened curves somewhat . because there are many cases , we first list and discuss the cases to make it clear that every possibility is covered . [ boundary case ] : : both endpoints of @xmath173 are on boundary segments . [ boundary spiral case ] : : @xmath173 has one endpoint on a boundary segment and one spiral point . [ closed case ] : : @xmath173 is a closed curve . by the symmetry of swapping @xmath173 and @xmath196 , in the remaining cases we are free to assume that both @xmath173 and @xmath196 have spiral points at both ends . [ spiral essential case ] : : @xmath173 and @xmath196 both have spiral points at both ends , and they have an intersection that can not be removed by changing the directions of spiral points . in the remaining cases , we can assume that the only intersections between @xmath173 and @xmath196 come at shared spiral points where their spiral directions disagree . [ spiral one not case ] : : @xmath173 and @xmath196 both have spiral points at both ends , and only intersect where they share spiral points with opposite directions . one spiral point of @xmath196 is not a spiral point of @xmath173 . again by symmetry , in the remaining case we are free to assume that the set of spiral points of @xmath173 equals the set of spiral points of @xmath196 . [ spiral equal case ] : : @xmath173 and @xmath196 both have spiral points at both ends , and only intersect where they share spiral points with opposite directions . the set of spiral points of @xmath173 equals the set of spiral points of @xmath196 . these cases exhaust the possibilities . [ the missing case ] when @xmath154 is a surface with no boundary components and exactly one puncture ( the case explicitly ruled out by hypothesis ) , to prove the curve separation property , we must construct a tagged triangulation @xmath165 and an arc @xmath156 as described above , with the additional requirement that @xmath165 has all arcs tagged plain . for such a surface @xmath154 , only [ closed case ] , [ spiral essential case ] , and [ spiral equal case ] apply . with a view towards eventually removing the extra hypothesis from the theorem , we give arguments in [ closed case ] and [ spiral equal case ] that also work for this kind of surface @xmath154 . the arguments work because when @xmath151 has no boundary components and exactly one puncture , no arc bounds a once - punctured monogon . thus when @xmath151 has no boundary components and exactly one puncture and we construct @xmath184 , we know automatically that @xmath165 has all arcs tagged plain . we are presently unable to prove [ spiral essential case ] for @xmath154 having no boundary components and exactly one puncture . we now proceed to consider each case . [ boundary case ] [ two boundary case ] we color the two boundary segments red and draw blue and purple arcs as shown in figure [ two boundary fig ] . ] the top blue arc starts at the point @xmath8 , closely follows the left red boundary segment down to @xmath173 , then closely follows @xmath173 to the right red boundary segment , and closely follows that boundary segment up to the point @xmath158 . we make the symmetric construction for the bottom blue arc . since the two red segments are distinct , the blue arcs are compatible or coincide . the purple arc is a diagonal of the red - blue - red - blue rectangle and connects points @xmath7 and @xmath158 . if the top blue arc bounds an unpunctured monogon , then points @xmath8 and @xmath158 coincide , and @xmath173 is not allowable because it is contractible to a piece of the boundary containing one marked point . if the top blue arc defines an unpunctured digon , then point @xmath158 is a neighbor to point @xmath8 on the same boundary component . in this case , we replace the top blue arc by the boundary segment ( which we again color blue ) whose endpoints are @xmath8 and @xmath158 . the symmetric argument shows that the bottom blue arc is valid or can be replaced by a boundary segment . the purple arc @xmath156 does not bound an unpunctured monogon because if points @xmath7 and @xmath158 coincide , then the two red segments coincide , contradicting the description of this case . if the purple arc defines an unpunctured digon , then one of the blue arcs bounds an unpunctured monogon , but this has already been ruled out . extend these arcs to a triangulation @xmath184 . the blue and purple arcs and the red segments define triangles in @xmath184 . if @xmath196 is a curve that intersects @xmath173 ( and if the intersection can not be avoided by independent isotopy deformations of the two curves ) , then @xmath196 must , somewhere along its extent , enter the pictured quadrilateral through a blue arc ( or originate on a blue segment ) , cross the purple arc , and exit through the opposite blue arc ( or end on the opposite blue segment ) . [ one boundary case ] the situation is illustrated in the top - left picture of figure [ one boundary fig ] . + color the boundary segment red and draw blue and purple arcs as shown in the top - right picture of figure [ one boundary fig ] . the blue arc follows closely the red segment from point @xmath8 to @xmath173 , turns left and follows @xmath173 closely without crossing it , and finally turns left and follows the red segment closely down to point @xmath7 . the purple arc @xmath156 follows the red segment closely up from point @xmath7 , crosses @xmath173 once and , the second time it meets @xmath173 , turns right and follows @xmath173 without crossing it until it meets the earlier part of the purple arc , then turns left and follows the red segment closely back down to @xmath7 without crossing itself . if the blue arc bounds an unpunctured monogon , then points @xmath8 and @xmath7 coincide and @xmath173 is not allowable because it is contractible to a piece of the boundary containing one marked point . if the blue arc defines an unpunctured digon , then points @xmath8 and @xmath7 are the only marked points on their boundary segment , and we replace the blue arc with the boundary segment connecting @xmath8 and @xmath7 that is not already red , coloring this segment blue . the purple arc does not bound an unpunctured monogon because @xmath173 is not contractible to a piece of the red boundary segment . if the purple arc defines an unpunctured digon , then the blue arc bounds an unpunctured monogon , but we have already ruled out that possibility . extend these arcs to a triangulation @xmath184 . in @xmath184 , there is a second triangle having the purple arc as an edge . if the second triangle is self - folded , then @xmath173 is an excluded curve of a type illustrated in figure [ exclude curves ] . thus the second triangle is not self - folded , and we color its other edges as in the bottom - left picture of figure [ one boundary fig ] . now suppose @xmath196 intersects @xmath173 . then @xmath196 must cross the blue arc ( or originate on the blue segment ) on the outer side of the picture and then cross either the inner red arc or the inner blue arc . if it crosses the inner blue arc , then the shear coordinates @xmath180 and @xmath197 have strictly opposite signs . otherwise , we alter the collection of arcs so that the purple arc and the inner red and blue arcs are incident to point @xmath8 instead of point @xmath7 . recoloring appropriately , we obtain the bottom - right picture of figure [ one boundary fig ] . now @xmath196 crosses the red arc on the outer side of the picture and then the inner red arc , so the two shear coordinates have strictly opposite signs . [ boundary spiral case ] suppose first that @xmath173 spirals clockwise into the puncture . color the boundary segment red and label its endpoints @xmath8 and @xmath7 as shown in figure [ boundary puncture fig ] . label the spiral point as @xmath158 . draw a blue arc from point @xmath8 , following the red segment closely to @xmath173 , following @xmath173 to point @xmath158 , going closely around point @xmath158 , following @xmath173 closely back to the red segment , and following the red segment to point @xmath7 . the blue arc does not bound an unpunctured monogon because @xmath154 is not a once - punctured monogon . if the blue arc defines an unpunctured digon , then points @xmath8 and @xmath7 are the only marked points on their boundary component and we replace the blue arc with the non - red boundary segment connecting point @xmath8 to point @xmath7 , coloring this segment blue . draw a purple arc from point @xmath7 to itself , following the red segment closely from point @xmath7 to point @xmath8 and then following the blue arc closely back to point @xmath7 . the purple arc does not bound an unpunctured monogon . it also does not define an unpunctured digon because @xmath154 is not a once - punctured monogon . now draw an arc from point @xmath7 to the puncture , without crossing the purple arc . this arc is indicated both in red and in blue in the picture to match the coloring conventions of figures [ shear fig ] and [ shear self - folded fig ] . complete these arcs to a triangulation @xmath184 . if @xmath196 is not compatible with @xmath173 , then there are two possibilities . the first possibility is that some portion of @xmath196 crosses the outer blue arc ( or originates in the outer blue segment ) then crosses the red / blue arc before crossing the outer blue arc again ( or terminating in the outer blue segment ) . in doing so , @xmath196 crosses the red - blue - red - blue quadrilateral twice , picking up a nonzero contribution to @xmath197 one of the two times . the second possibility is that @xmath173 crosses the outer blue arc ( or originates in the outer blue segment ) and then spirals counterclockwise into the puncture . in either case , we obtain the desired sign difference of shear coordinates at the purple arc @xmath156 . notice that in the case where @xmath173 and @xmath196 intersect but are compatible ( that is , when they agree except for the direction of the spiral into the puncture ) , the relevant shear coordinate for @xmath196 is zero . if @xmath173 spirals counterclockwise into the puncture , then we redraw the picture swapping the roles of points @xmath8 and @xmath7 , reversing left and right in drawing the arcs , and swapping the colors red and blue . [ closed case ] choose a direction to traverse @xmath173 . say a marked point @xmath181 is * _ left of @xmath173 _ * if , traversing @xmath173 in the chosen direction , there is a path that leaves @xmath173 , goes left , and reaches @xmath181 without crossing @xmath173 again . we define the notion * _ right of @xmath173 _ * analogously . for certain curves @xmath173 , it is possible for the same point to be both right of @xmath173 and left of @xmath173 . [ closed left right case ] label some marked point left of @xmath173 with the number @xmath8 . label some marked point right of @xmath173 with the number @xmath7 . possibly the points @xmath8 and @xmath7 coincide . we draw a blue arc that follows closely on the left some curve from point @xmath8 to the left of @xmath173 , turns left , follows @xmath173 closely on the left all around , turns left again and follows closely the curve back to point @xmath8 . we draw another blue curve in the same way on the right . these curves are shown in figure [ closed annulus fig ] . ] neither blue arc bounds an unpunctured monogon , because @xmath173 is not contractible to a puncture . if the blue arc at point @xmath8 defines an unpunctured digon , then point @xmath8 is on a boundary component and is the only marked point on that component . in this case , we replace the inner blue arc with the unique boundary segment on that component , which we then color blue . ( in this case , we should replace the light gray striped shading with dark gray shading . ) we proceed similarly if the blue arc at point @xmath7 defines an unpunctured digon . if points @xmath8 and @xmath7 coincide , then possibly the two blue curves coincide as well . if @xmath196 intersects @xmath173 , then somewhere along its extent it crosses the outer blue arc ( or originates on the outer blue segment ) and then crosses the inner blue arc ( or terminates on the inner blue segment ) . possibly @xmath196 winds around the inner blue arc a number of times before crossing it , but for simplicity , it is shown without winding in figure [ closed annulus fig ] . we draw a red arc from point @xmath8 to point @xmath7 without crossing @xmath196 as follows : the arc follows the inner blue arc closely counterclockwise to @xmath196 , then follows @xmath196 closely , without crossing it , to the outer blue arc , and finally follows closely the outer blue arc clockwise to point @xmath7 . the red and blue arcs define a quadrilateral with the red edges identified . we draw a purple arc @xmath156 that forms a diagonal of this quadrilateral . ( either diagonal works for the conclusion of the theorem , but one choice is consistent with our coloring scheme . ) we complete this set of arcs to a triangulation @xmath184 . [ closed not left right case ] without loss of generality , suppose all marked points are left of @xmath173 . since these points are not also right of @xmath173 , the surface decomposes at @xmath173 as a connected sum . in figure [ closed sum fig ] , we depict the situation with the `` left '' summand , containing marked points , outside of the curve @xmath173 and the `` right '' summand , containing no marked points , inside @xmath173 . since @xmath173 is not contractible , the right summand is topologically nontrivial . we choose a particular marked point , labeled @xmath8 , on the left and draw a blue arc closely following @xmath173 just as we drew the first blue arc in [ closed left right case ] . as in [ closed left right case ] , the blue arc does not bound an unpunctured monogon , and if it defines an unpunctured digon then we replace it with a blue boundary segment . if @xmath196 intersects @xmath173 , then @xmath196 must , somewhere along its extent , cross @xmath173 to enter the right summand , trace a nontrivial loop in the right summand , and then cross @xmath173 again to leave the right summand . in fact , @xmath196 may do this several times , but in the description below , we ignore any other pieces of @xmath196 that cross @xmath173 . the situation is depicted in the left picture of figure [ closed sum fig ] . in this picture , the entire region inside @xmath173 is shaded with light gray stripes to indicate both that the right connected summand is topologically nontrivial and that the closed path formed by part of @xmath196 and part of the blue arc is neither contractible to a point , nor isotopic to @xmath173 . now , draw a red arc and a purple arc as shown in the right picture of figure [ closed sum fig ] . the red arc follows the blue arc closely from point @xmath8 up to @xmath196 , follows @xmath196 closely without crossing it until reaching the blue arc again , and follows to blue arc back to the point @xmath8 . the purple arc follows the blue arc , crosses @xmath196 , and continues almost back to point @xmath8 before turning to follow @xmath196 closely , without immediately crossing @xmath196 again . it follows @xmath196 closely until it is close to the blue arc and then crosses @xmath196 to follow the blue arc back to point @xmath8 . the red and purple arcs do not bound unpunctured monogons or define unpunctured digons because the part of @xmath196 shown is not contractible to part of the blue arc . the red , blue , and purple arcs form a triangle , oriented consistently with the convention of figure [ shear fig ] . these arcs can be completed to a triangulation @xmath184 . in @xmath184 , there is a second triangle having the purple arc as an edge , as shown in figure [ closed sum fig 2 ] . since the point @xmath8 is the only marked point that can be reached without crossing the blue arc , all three vertices of the second triangle are at point @xmath8 . the second triangle is not self - folded , because all three of its vertices coincide . to compute @xmath180 , notice that @xmath173 intersects the red - blue - red - blue quadrilateral in at least two places . two intersections are shown in figure [ closed sum fig 2 ] . one of the two contributes @xmath57 to @xmath180 , but the other contributes @xmath8 . a similar situation arises in the calculation of @xmath197 . an explicit example of [ closed not left right case ] may be helpful . we take @xmath154 to be the double - torus with one puncture and take @xmath173 to be a curve along which @xmath151 decomposes as a connected sum of tori . this is a fairly representative example , since the right connected summand of @xmath151 in general is a nonempty connected sum of tori . specifically , let @xmath151 be the octagon with identifications indicated in the top - left picture of figure [ closed sum example fig ] . + all eight vertices of the octagon are identified , and we take this common point to be the puncture . the curves @xmath173 and @xmath196 are indicated as usual by a solid black and a dotted green line . the curve @xmath173 appears in four pieces that are identified to a closed curve ; the curve @xmath196 appears in two pieces . the top - right picture of figure [ closed sum example fig ] shows the blue , red , and purple arcs constructed first . the bottom picture shows these three arcs , straightened and completed to a triangulation of @xmath151 . [ spiral essential case ] draw a purple arc between the spiral points of @xmath173 , following @xmath173 closely except for the spirals . possibly the endpoints of the purple arc coincide , but the purple arc does not bound an unpunctured or once - punctured monogon because @xmath173 is not contractible to a spiral point and because @xmath173 is not an excluded curve in definition [ quasi lam def ] . choose a spiral point of @xmath196 and label it @xmath8 . label the spiral points of @xmath173 as @xmath7 and @xmath158 . let @xmath208 be the part of @xmath196 from the chosen spiral point to the first point where @xmath196 intersects @xmath173 , aside from any intersections that arise if point @xmath8 coincides with point @xmath7 and/or @xmath158 and spiral directions of @xmath173 and @xmath196 disagree there . draw a red arc that follows @xmath173 closely from point @xmath7 without crossing it ( except for the spiral ) to @xmath208 , then follows @xmath208 without crossing it ( except for the spiral ) to point @xmath8 . draw a blue arc from point @xmath158 to point @xmath8 closely following @xmath173 and then @xmath208 . these arcs are shown in the left picture of figure [ essential ] . until further notice , ignore the directions of spirals in the pictures . suppose the red arc bounds an unpunctured monogon . then points @xmath8 and @xmath7 coincide . furthermore , if the spiral directions of @xmath173 and @xmath196 agree at this point , then this first intersection of @xmath196 with @xmath173 can be removed by an isotopy deformation of @xmath196 . on the other hand , if spiral directions disagree at this point , then this first intersection can be removed by changing the directions of spiral points . either way , we have contradicted our construction of @xmath208 , so the red arc does not bound an unpunctured monogon . by the same argument , the blue arc also does not bound an unpunctured monogon . the red and blue arcs are not isotopic because if so , then @xmath173 is an excluded curve in definition [ quasi lam def ] . we extend these three arcs to a triangulation . in this triangulation , there is a second triangle having the purple arc as an edge . this second triangle is not self - folded , because if so , then @xmath173 is an excluded curve in definition [ quasi lam def ] . the situation is illustrated in the right picture in figure [ essential ] , still ignoring directions of spirals . possibly point @xmath153 coincides with some or all of the points @xmath8 , @xmath7 , and @xmath158 . let @xmath128 denote the red - blue - red - blue rectangle shown in the right picture of figure [ essential ] . after following @xmath208 , the curve @xmath196 exits @xmath128 either through the bottom blue arc or through the bottom red arc , possibly by spiraling into point @xmath153 . up to a global reorientation , we can assume that @xmath196 either spirals into point @xmath153 or exits through the bottom blue arc . suppose the bottom blue arc is isotopic to the top red arc . if @xmath196 spirals into point @xmath153 , then @xmath196 is an excluded curve in definition [ quasi lam def ] . if @xmath196 exits @xmath128 through the blue arc without spiraling into point @xmath153 , then the situation is as pictured in figure [ essential isotopic ] , still ignoring spiral directions . ] in this case , @xmath196 must spiral into point 2 , so it only intersects @xmath173 , if at all , by spiraling the other direction into point @xmath7 . we conclude from these contradictions that the bottom blue arc is not isotopic to the top red arc . possibly , however , the two red arcs are isotopic to each other , the two blue arcs are isotopic to each other , and/or the bottom red arc is isotopic to the top blue arc . in the triangulation containing these two triangles , there is another triangle sharing the top red arc as an edge , as shown in the left picture of figure [ essential alter ] . possibly this new triangle is self - folded , but if so , then the red arc is not one of the two edges that are folded onto each other . we flip the red arc to produce a new red - blue - purple triangle as shown in the middle picture of figure [ essential alter ] . let @xmath303 be the red - blue - red - blue rectangle consisting of the two triangles having the purple arc as an edge ( after the flip of the red edge ) . possibly the two red arcs of the original rectangle @xmath128 coincide . in this case , the bottom triangle of @xmath128 is also affected by the flip of the red arc , and so @xmath196 exits @xmath303 through its bottom blue arc , regardless of whether @xmath196 spirals into point @xmath153 or exits @xmath128 through the blue arc . if @xmath196 exits @xmath303 through the blue arc , then we make no more flips and define @xmath304 to be @xmath303 . otherwise , the two red arcs of @xmath128 do nt coincide , the bottom triangle of @xmath303 coincides with the bottom triangle of @xmath128 , and @xmath196 spirals into point @xmath153 . in this case , the bottom red arc of @xmath303 is not isotopic to the top blue arc of @xmath303 for the same reason that the top red arc of @xmath128 is not isotopic to the bottom blue arc of @xmath128 . the bottom red and blue arcs of @xmath303 are not isotopic ( i.e. the bottom triangle of @xmath303 is not self - folded ) for the same reason that the top red and blue arcs of @xmath128 are not isotopic . the two red arcs of @xmath303 may be isotopic . we flip the bottom red arc of @xmath303 , just as we flipped the top red arc of @xmath128 , to obtain a new rectangle @xmath304 , composed of two triangles sharing the purple arc as an edge , such that @xmath196 enters through the top blue arc and exits through the bottom blue arc . ( the fact that @xmath196 enters @xmath304 through the top blue arc follows from the fact that @xmath196 enters @xmath303 through the top blue arc , even in the case where the two red arcs of @xmath303 are isotopic . ) this construction of @xmath304 is illustrated in the right picture of figure [ essential alter ] . if any red or blue arc defining @xmath304 bounds a once - punctured monogon , we replace it by an arc from the vertex of the monogon to the puncture , tagged notched at the puncture . ( we have already ruled out the possibility that the purple arc @xmath156 bounds a once - punctured monogon . ) the spiral directions of spiral points of @xmath196 are now irrelevant . if the spiral direction of @xmath173 at point @xmath7 disagrees with the direction shown in figure [ essential alter ] , then we tag all arcs notched at point @xmath7 and similarly for point @xmath158 . we can do this even if points @xmath7 and @xmath158 coincide , because in that case , @xmath173 has the same spiral directions at both ends . we complete the tagged arcs to a tagged triangulation @xmath165 , change all tags to plain ( reversing spiral directions accordingly ) and apply @xmath305 to make a triangulation to calculate @xmath180 and @xmath197 as in definition [ shear def ] . this latter triangulation contains the two triangles of @xmath304 and the altered spiral directions are also as shown in the figure . [ spiral one not case ] [ spiral one not distinct case ] number the spiral points so that @xmath173 spirals into @xmath8 and @xmath7 and @xmath196 spirals into @xmath7 and @xmath158 . draw a red arc and a blue arc from @xmath8 to @xmath158 as shown in the left picture of figure [ 3 spirals fig ] . , title="fig:"],title="fig : " ] for the moment , ignore the directions of spirals in the picture . each arc follows @xmath173 and then @xmath196 closely . these two arcs are not isotopic to each other because otherwise @xmath154 is a sphere with @xmath158 punctures . also draw two gray arcs from @xmath7 to @xmath158 , following @xmath196 closely and staying between the red arc and the blue arc . tag one arc plain at point @xmath7 and tag the other arc notched at point @xmath7 . none of these arcs bounds a monogon because points @xmath8 , @xmath7 , and @xmath158 are distinct . tag the arcs at points @xmath8 and/or @xmath158 notched if the spiral directions of @xmath173 or @xmath196 disagree with figure [ 3 spirals fig ] at these points . complete to a tagged triangulation @xmath165 . if the spiral directions at point @xmath7 agree with figure [ 3 spirals fig ] , then we take @xmath156 to be the gray arc tagged notched at point @xmath7 . if the spiral directions at point @xmath7 disagree with figure [ 3 spirals fig ] , then we take @xmath156 to be the gray arc tagged plain at point @xmath7 . in either case , to calculate the shear coordinates @xmath180 and @xmath197 , we pass to a triangulation and spiral directions as in the right picture of figure [ 3 spirals fig ] . the purple arc in the right picture is @xmath156 . the other gray arc in the left picture , besides @xmath156 , becomes the arc in the right picture that we color red on one side and blue on the other side as in figure [ shear self - folded fig ] . [ spiral one not coincide case ] the curve @xmath173 has both spiral points in the same direction at the same point ( labeled @xmath8 in figure [ curve and loop ] ) . we first draw a red arc as shown in the left picture in figure [ curve and loop ] , starting at point @xmath7 , following @xmath196 closely , crossing @xmath173 twice near point @xmath8 , following @xmath173 closely back to the earlier part of the red arc , then following the red arc closely back to point @xmath7 . this red arc does not bound an unpunctured monogon because if so , then @xmath173 is contractible to the puncture @xmath8 . suppose this red arc bounds a once - punctured monogon . then the puncture is either point @xmath8 or a marked point in the region shaded striped gray in figure [ curve and loop ] . in either case , @xmath173 is an excluded curve in definition [ quasi lam def ] , so we conclude that the red arc does not bound a once - punctured monogon . we next draw a blue arc as shown , following the red arc closely from point @xmath7 to point @xmath8 and then following @xmath196 closely back to point @xmath7 . if the blue arc bounds an unpunctured monogon , then @xmath173 is an excluded curve in definition [ quasi lam def ] . if the blue arc bounds a once - punctured monogon , then replace it with an arc from point @xmath7 to the puncture , tagged notched at the puncture . now tag appropriately at points @xmath8 and @xmath7 to obtain the correct spiral directions and produce a triangulation , similarly to [ spiral one not distinct case ] . part of the triangulation is shown in the right picture of figure [ curve and loop ] . [ spiral equal case ] [ spiral equal two coincide case ] in fact , since @xmath173 and @xmath196 are incompatible , the spiral directions must disagree at both points . draw a purple arc , as in figure [ two coincide fig ] , following the two curves closely . since the purple arc has 2 distinct endpoints , it does not bound a monogon . the purple arc can be completed to some triangulation . if the purple arc constitutes two sides of a self - folded triangle in the triangulation , then we flip the third side to obtain a new triangulation in which the purple arc is an edge of two distinct triangles . these two triangles are represented in figure [ two coincide fig ] , although any of the points shown may coincide ( except points @xmath8 and @xmath7 ) , and various combinations of the arcs shown may coincide . we apply @xmath159 to the triangulation . the resulting tagged triangulation has plain tags at points @xmath8 and @xmath7 because the purple arc is not part of a self - folded triangle . we change the plain tagging at point @xmath8 and/or point @xmath7 to notched tagging if the spiral directions at these points do not agree with figure [ two coincide fig ] . the tagged triangulation with these altered taggings is @xmath165 . when shear coordinates are calculated for the purple arc @xmath156 , we pass to a triangulation and spiral directions as shown in figure [ two coincide fig ] . [ spiral equal two one not coincide case ] label the two spiral points as @xmath8 and @xmath7 . draw two gray arcs from @xmath8 to @xmath7 , following @xmath173 closely . tag these two arcs oppositely at point @xmath7 . draw a red arc following @xmath173 closely from point @xmath8 to point @xmath7 and then following @xmath196 closely from point @xmath7 back to point @xmath8 . draw a blue arc similarly on the other side of @xmath173 and @xmath196 . the red and blue arcs are not isotopic , because if so @xmath154 is a twice - punctured sphere . since @xmath173 and @xmath196 do nt coincide , even ignoring spiral directions , neither the red arc nor the blue arc bounds an unpunctured monogon . if either or both arcs bounds a once - punctured monogon , then replace it with an arc from @xmath8 to the puncture , tagged notched at the puncture . tag arcs notched at point @xmath8 if the spiral directions disagree with those shown in figure [ two spirals disagree once ] and complete to a tagged triangulation @xmath165 . if the spiral directions at point @xmath7 agree with figure [ two spirals disagree once ] , then the gray arc tagged notched at point @xmath7 becomes the purple arc in the right picture of figure [ 3 spirals fig ] and the gray arc tagged plain at @xmath7 becomes the red / blue arc . if the spiral directions at point @xmath7 disagree with figure [ two spirals disagree once ] , the two gray arcs reverse roles . the calculation of shear coordinates at the purple arc involves arcs and spiral directions as shown in the right picture of figure [ two spirals disagree once ] . [ spiral equal two two not coincide case ] label the two spiral points as @xmath8 and @xmath7 . draw a blue arc , as in the top - left picture in figure [ two spirals disagree twice ] , following @xmath173 closely . + draw a red arc , as shown , following @xmath196 closely . the red and blue arcs can be completed to some triangulation . this triangulation has two triangles containing the blue arc as an edge . ( the presence of the red edge rules out the possibility that a triangle is folded onto the blue edge . ) one of these triangles is shown in the top - right picture of figure [ two spirals disagree twice ] . because points @xmath8 and @xmath7 do nt coincide , we assume up to symmetry that points @xmath8 and @xmath158 do nt coincide . thus the purple arc does not bound a monogon . possibly points @xmath7 and @xmath158 coincide but the new red arc does not bound an unpunctured monogon because it is part of some triangulation . if the new red arc bounds a once - punctured monogon , then we replace the new red arc with a tagged arc from point @xmath7 to the puncture . for the moment , we assume that the purple arc is not isotopic to the original red arc . the case where the two are isotopic is dealt with separately below . now draw another blue arc from point @xmath158 to point @xmath7 , closely following the purple arc to point @xmath8 and then closely following the red arc to point @xmath7 . this arc is shown in the bottom - left picture of figure [ two spirals disagree twice ] in the case where points @xmath7 and @xmath158 do not coincide , and in the bottom - right picture in the case where points @xmath7 and @xmath158 coincide . in the latter case , we need to consider the possibility that the new blue arc bounds an unpunctured or once - punctured monogon . but if the new blue arc bounds an unpunctured monogon , then the original red arc is isotopic to the purple arc , a possibility that we deal with separately below . if the new blue arc bounds a once - punctured monogon , then replace it with an arc from point 2 to the puncture , tagged notched at the puncture . now tag arcs at points @xmath8 and/or @xmath7 notched if the spiral directions at these points disagree with the figure , and complete to a tagged triangulation @xmath165 . to calculate shear coordinates @xmath180 and @xmath197 , we pass to a triangulation and spiral directions as shown in one of the bottom pictures of figure [ two spirals disagree twice ] . finally , we must consider the case where the original red arc is isotopic to the purple arc . figure [ two spirals disagree twice 2 ] illustrates this case . the purple arc is omitted in favor of the original red arc . arcs are also colored differently , with the red and blue arcs in the left picture of figure [ two spirals disagree twice 2 ] having switched colors from the top - left picture of figure [ two spirals disagree twice ] . the smaller red arc from the bottom - right picture of figure [ two spirals disagree twice ] is now colored purple . we complete these three arcs to a triangulation . in this triangulation , there is a second triangle having the purple arc as an edge , as illustrated in the right picture of figure [ two spirals disagree twice 2 ] . the new blue and red arcs may be isotopic , in which case the purple arc bounds a once - punctured monogon . in this case , we replace the purple arc with an arc from point 2 to the puncture , tagged notched at the puncture . again we tag arcs at points @xmath8 and/or @xmath7 notched if the spiral directions at these points disagree with the figure , and complete to a tagged triangulation @xmath165 . when shear coordinates are calculated for the purple arc @xmath156 , we pass to a triangulation and spiral directions as shown in the right picture of figure [ two spirals disagree twice 2 ] . the white space between the red and blue arcs is not shaded striped gray because the red and blue arcs may coincide . [ spiral equal one coincide case ] draw a purple arc following @xmath173 ( and thus @xmath196 ) closely . the purple arc does not bound an unpunctured or once - punctured monogon because @xmath173 is not contractible to a puncture and is not an excluded curve in definition [ quasi lam def ] . we complete the purple arc to a triangulation @xmath184 . since the purple arc does not have two distinct endpoints , it does not constitute two edges of a self - folded triangle . thus it is contained in two distinct triangles in @xmath184 . furthermore , neither of these triangles is self - folded , because otherwise @xmath173 is an excluded curve in definition [ quasi lam def ] . the relevant part of @xmath184 is shown in figure [ one coincide fig ] . up to switching @xmath173 with @xmath196 , the spirals are as shown in the figure . [ spiral equal one not coincide case ] the common spiral point is labeled @xmath8 . draw a gray arc following @xmath173 closely and a purple arc following @xmath196 closely . + + then draw a second gray arc following @xmath173 and then @xmath196 as shown in the top picture of figure [ one spirals disagree ] . ( there are two ways to draw the second gray arc relative to the spiral directions of @xmath173 and @xmath196 . the right way is shown in the figure . ) neither the first gray arc nor the purple arc bounds an unpunctured or once - punctured monogon because because neither @xmath173 nor @xmath196 is contractible to a spiral point or an excluded curve in definition [ quasi lam def ] . the second gray arc does not bound an unpunctured monogon because @xmath173 and @xmath196 do nt coincide , even when spiral directions are ignored . for the same reason , the first gray arc and the purple arc are not isotopy equivalent . the second gray arc is not equivalent to the other two arcs because it is their product in the sense of the fundamental group and neither of the other two arcs is trivial . these three distinct arcs form a triangle and can be completed to a triangulation . in this triangulation , there is another triangle having the first gray arc as an edge . this new triangle is not self - folded because the first gray edge does not bound a once - punctured monogon . it is shown in the middle picture of figure [ one spirals disagree ] , with one of the new edges red and one gray . the point @xmath7 may coincide with the point @xmath8 . we now have two triangles sharing an edge ( the first gray edge ) . we flip this shared edge , coloring the new edge blue , as shown in the bottom picture of figure [ one spirals disagree ] . this new configuration of five arcs can also be extended to a new triangulation . the new triangulation has another triangle sharing the purple arc as an edge . as before , the new triangle is not self - folded . it is also shown in the bottom picture of figure [ one spirals disagree ] with the new edges colored red and blue . the point @xmath158 may coincide with point @xmath8 and/or point @xmath7 . the triangulation constructed has the desired properties with respect to shear coordinates at the purple arc @xmath156 . in this section , we formulate the null tangle property of a marked surface , and show that it is equivalent to the assertion that the shear coordinates @xmath195 of allowable curves @xmath173 constitute a positive @xmath3-basis for @xmath171 . we observe that the curve separation property follows from the null tangle property . the observation suggests that it might be quite difficult to establish the null tangle property in general , since the proof of the curve separation property ( theorem [ curve separation ] ) was so complex , even leaving out one family of marked surfaces . here , we prove the null tangle property for a smaller family of marked surfaces . in @xcite , the null tangle property is established for an additional marked surface : the once - punctured torus . [ weighted tangle def ] a * _ ( weighted ) tangle ( of curves ) _ * in @xmath154 is a finite collection of curves , all distinct up to isotopy and all allowable in the sense of definition [ quasi lam def ] , with no requirement of compatibility between curves , and with each curve @xmath173 having a * _ weight _ * @xmath306 . we do not require weights to be positive as we did in the definitions of laminations and quasi - laminations ( definitions [ lam def ] and [ quasi lam def ] ) . the * _ support _ * of a tangle is the set of curves having nonzero weight . an * _ straight tangle _ * is a tangle consisting of pairwise compatible curves . ( the difference between a quasi - lamination and a straight tangle is that the weights in an straight tangle are allowed to be negative . ) a tangle is * _ trivial _ * if all weights are zero . the * _ weighted union _ * of tangles @xmath307 and @xmath308 is constructed by first taking the multiset union of @xmath307 and @xmath308 . then , for each curve @xmath173 that appears in both @xmath307 and @xmath308 , we replace the two copies of @xmath173 with a single copy of @xmath173 whose weight is the sum of the original two weights . [ null tangle def ] a tangle @xmath309 has shear coordinates @xmath310 with respect to any tagged triangulation @xmath165 , given by the weighted sum of vectors @xmath195 over all of the curves @xmath311 . each @xmath195 is calculated as in definition [ shear def ] . if @xmath154 has either one or more boundary components or two or more punctures or both , then a * _ null tangle _ * in @xmath154 is a tangle @xmath309 such that @xmath310 is the zero vector for all tagged triangulations @xmath165 . if @xmath154 has no boundary components and exactly one puncture , then a * _ null tangle _ * is a tangle @xmath309 such that @xmath310 is the zero vector for all tagged triangulations @xmath165 with all tags plain . a marked surface has the * _ null tangle property _ * if every null tangle is trivial . the main results of this section are the following theorems and an immediate corollary . [ null tangle theorem ] suppose @xmath3 is @xmath4 or @xmath5 and let @xmath165 be a tagged triangulation of @xmath154 ( with all arcs tagged plain if @xmath154 has no boundary components and exactly one puncture ) . the following are equivalent . a. [ null tangle theorem null ] @xmath154 has the null tangle property . b. [ null tangle theorem basis ] the shear coordinates of allowable curves form an @xmath3-basis for @xmath171 . c. [ null tangle theorem pos basis ] the shear coordinates of allowable curves form a positive @xmath3-basis for @xmath171 . [ poly grow null tangle ] if @xmath154 is a sphere having @xmath164 boundary components and @xmath181 punctures with @xmath312 , then @xmath154 has the null tangle property . the hypothesis of theorem [ poly grow null tangle ] is that @xmath154 is a disk with @xmath57 , @xmath8 , or @xmath7 punctures , an annulus with @xmath57 or @xmath8 punctures , or a sphere with three boundary components . [ poly grow univ ] if @xmath154 is a sphere having @xmath164 boundary components and @xmath181 punctures with @xmath312 , then the shear coordinates of allowable curves form a positive @xmath3-basis for @xmath0 , for @xmath10 or @xmath5 . [ poly grow remark ] comparing with ( * ? ? ? * proposition 11.2 ) , we see that the marked surfaces identified in theorem [ poly grow null tangle ] and corollary [ poly grow univ ] are precisely those whose associated cluster algebra has polynomial growth . ( see ( * ? ? ? * section 11 ) . ) given that the null tangle property is established for an additional surface in @xcite , the connection to polynomial growth is probably coincidental . [ finite null tangle remark ] the marked surfaces of theorem [ poly grow null tangle ] and corollary [ poly grow univ ] include those of finite type in the sense of ( * ? ? ? * section 1.3 ) ( the cases of an unpunctured or once - punctured disk ) . we recover a weaker version of ( * ? ? ? * proposition 17.5 ) , giving a proof entirely in terms of triangulated surfaces . [ affine null tangle remark ] the marked surfaces of theorem [ poly grow null tangle ] and corollary [ poly grow univ ] also include those of affine type in the sense of ( * ? ? ? * definition 10.9 ) ( the cases of a twice - punctured disk or unpunctured annulus ) . for exchange matrices @xmath0 of affine type , it is conjectured ( * ? ? ? * conjecture 10.10 ) that the @xmath276-vectors associated to @xmath313 , together with an additional integer vector , are a positive @xmath3-basis for @xmath0 , for any @xmath3 . the results of this section establish the marked surfaces case of ( * ? ? ? * conjecture 10.10 ) , using proposition [ g surfaces ] and the fact that there is a unique allowable closed curve in these cases . example [ affine a2 surface ] . the point of defining null tangles is the connection to @xmath0-coherent linear relations . [ null tangle is b coher rel ] a tangle @xmath309 in @xmath154 is null if and only if @xmath314 is a @xmath171-coherent linear relation for any tagged triangulation @xmath165 ( with all tags plain if @xmath154 has no boundary components and exactly one puncture ) . by theorem [ mut q - lam ] , a tangle @xmath309 is null if and only if @xmath314 is a nontrivial linear relation among the shear coordinates of allowable curves that is preserved ( in the sense of ) under mutation maps at @xmath171 . now proposition [ no zero no piecewise ] says that @xmath309 is null if and only if @xmath314 is a @xmath171-coherent linear relation . proposition [ null tangle is b coher rel ] implies the following rephrasing of the null tangle property . [ null tangle prop ] suppose @xmath3 is @xmath4 or @xmath5 and let @xmath165 be a tagged triangulation of @xmath154 ( with all arcs tagged plain if @xmath154 has no boundary components and exactly one puncture ) . then @xmath154 has the null tangle property if and only if the shear coordinates of allowable curves constitute an @xmath3-independent set for @xmath171 . we now quote a version of ( * ? ? ? * proposition 4.12 ) . the proposition is stated in @xcite in terms of @xmath0-coherent linear relations , but we use proposition [ null tangle is b coher rel ] to state a specialization of the proposition in terms of tangles . [ one positive or one negative ] let @xmath309 be a tangle in @xmath154 . suppose for some tagged triangulation @xmath165 ( with all tags plain if @xmath154 has no boundary components and exactly one puncture ) , for some tagged arc @xmath156 in @xmath165 , and for some curve @xmath173 in @xmath309 that @xmath180 is strictly positive ( resp . strictly negative ) and that @xmath197 is nonpositive ( resp . nonnegative ) for every other @xmath315 . then @xmath316 . we now explain the connection between the null tangle property and the curve separation property . the * _ disorder _ * of a tangle @xmath309 is the smallest number @xmath59 such that , after deleting curves with weight zero , @xmath309 is a weighted union of @xmath59 straight tangles . then the null tangle property is the statement that the disorder of a null tangle must be @xmath57 . one approach to establishing the property would be to rule out null tangles of disorder @xmath59 for all positive @xmath59 . the curve separation property is closely related to ruling out null tangles of certain small disorders . [ no 1 2 ] null tangles of disorder @xmath8 do not exist in any marked surface . if @xmath154 has the curve separation property , then null tangles of disorder @xmath7 do not exist in @xmath154 . theorem [ rat fb surfaces ] , specifically the fact that @xmath213 is simplicial , implies that a null tangle can not have disorder @xmath8 . suppose @xmath154 has the curve separation property . if a null tangle @xmath309 has disorder @xmath7 , then it is a weighted union of two non - trivial straight tangles @xmath307 and @xmath308 , and there is a curve @xmath173 in the support of @xmath307 and curve @xmath196 in the support of @xmath308 such that @xmath173 and @xmath196 are not compatible . the curve separation property says that there is a tagged triangulation @xmath165 and an arc @xmath156 ( with all arcs tagged plain if @xmath154 has no boundary components and exactly one puncture ) such that @xmath180 and @xmath197 have strictly opposite signs . without loss of generality , take @xmath180 positive and @xmath197 negative . proposition [ fbt compatible ] says that @xmath307 is contained in a @xmath171-cone , so proposition [ contained bcone ] says that @xmath317 is nonnegative for every curve @xmath182 in @xmath307 . similarly @xmath318 is nonpositive for every curve @xmath208 in @xmath308 . since @xmath309 is a null tangle , we have @xmath319 . let @xmath167 be the tagged triangulation obtained by flipping @xmath156 in @xmath165 . since the shear coordinates @xmath317 all have weakly the same sign , theorem [ mut q - lam ] ( applied separately to each curve in @xmath307 ) implies that @xmath320 . for the same reason , @xmath321 . but @xmath171 does not have a row consisting all of zeros , so it does not have a column consisting all of zeros . thus since @xmath322 and @xmath323 have strictly opposite signs in the entry indexed by @xmath156 , looking at we conclude that @xmath324 . this contradicts the assumption that @xmath309 is a null tangle . [ null disorder 3 curve sep ] if @xmath154 does not admit null tangles of disorder @xmath7 or @xmath158 , then @xmath154 has the curve separation property . suppose the curve separation property fails . then there exist incompatible curves @xmath173 and @xmath196 such that @xmath200 and @xmath201 have weakly the same sign for all @xmath167 and @xmath325 . ( if @xmath154 has no boundary components and exactly one puncture , then instead we know that @xmath200 and @xmath201 have weakly the same sign for all @xmath167 with all arcs tagged plain . ) applying theorem [ mut q - lam ] , we see that @xmath326 and @xmath327 form a sign - coherent set for any sequence @xmath120 of indices . proposition [ contained bcone ] says that @xmath195 and @xmath204 are contained in some @xmath0-cone , so @xmath328 equals @xmath329 for any @xmath120 by proposition [ linear ] . now let @xmath175 be the unique quasi - lamination with @xmath330 . let @xmath307 be the tangle containing only the curve @xmath173 with weight @xmath8 and let @xmath308 be the tangle containing only @xmath196 with weight @xmath8 . let @xmath331 be the tangle obtained from @xmath175 by negating all weights . the weighted union of @xmath307 , @xmath308 , and @xmath331 is a null tangle of disorder @xmath332 . but @xmath333 because @xmath173 and @xmath196 are incompatible . proposition [ no 1 2 ] rules out the possibility @xmath334 , so @xmath335 is @xmath7 or @xmath158 . [ null implies sep ] if @xmath154 has the null tangle property , then it also has the curve separation property . combining results , we obtain theorem [ null tangle theorem ] . given , theorem [ curves pos basis ] , corollary [ null implies sep ] and proposition [ null tangle prop ] prove , which trivially implies , which implies by proposition [ null tangle prop ] . the relationship between the curve separation property and the null tangle property suggests that we might extend the proof of theorem [ curve separation ] to establish the null tangle property under the hypotheses of theorem [ curve separation ] . while this seems hard in general , some of the easier cases of the proof of the theorem extend to partial statements about the null tangle property , which lead to the proof of theorem [ poly grow null tangle ] . [ null tangle two boundary ] if @xmath309 is a null tangle , then no curve in the support of @xmath309 connects two distinct boundary segments . suppose @xmath173 is an allowable curve connecting two distinct boundary segments . construct a tagged triangulation @xmath167 and distinguish a ( purple ) arc @xmath325 as in [ two boundary case ] of the proof of theorem [ curve separation ] . ( see figure [ two boundary fig ] . ) we observe that @xmath173 is the unique allowable curve whose shear coordinate @xmath180 is strictly positive and apply proposition [ one positive or one negative ] to conclude that @xmath173 can not appear in the support of a null tangle . [ null tangle boundary puncture ] if @xmath309 is a null tangle , then no curve in the support of @xmath309 has one endpoint on a boundary segment and spirals into a marked point at the other end . suppose @xmath173 is an allowable curve having one endpoint on a boundary segment and a spiral point at the other end . construct @xmath167 and the purple arc @xmath325 as in [ boundary spiral case ] of the proof of theorem [ curve separation ] . ( see figure [ boundary puncture fig ] . ) again , we observe that @xmath173 is the unique allowable curve whose shear coordinate @xmath180 is strictly positive and apply proposition [ one positive or one negative ] . [ null tangle one boundary ] suppose @xmath154 is a sphere having @xmath164 boundary components and @xmath181 punctures , with @xmath312 . if @xmath309 is a null tangle , then no curve in the support of @xmath309 has both endpoints on the same boundary segment . suppose @xmath309 is a null tangle and let @xmath173 be a curve in @xmath309 with both endpoints on the same boundary segment . in particular , @xmath154 is not a disk or once - punctured disk . construct @xmath167 and the purple arc @xmath325 in the bottom - left picture of figure [ one boundary fig ] , in [ one boundary case ] of the proof of theorem [ curve separation ] . suppose @xmath196 is a curve in @xmath309 with @xmath336 . then @xmath196 has an endpoint on the same boundary segment as @xmath173 , so propositions [ null tangle two boundary ] and [ null tangle boundary puncture ] imply that @xmath196 has both endpoints on the same boundary segment as @xmath173 . if @xmath154 is a disk with @xmath7 punctures or an unpunctured annulus , then each boundary segment admits a unique allowable curve with both endpoints on that boundary segment . thus @xmath173 is the unique curve in @xmath309 with @xmath337 . we apply proposition [ one positive or one negative ] to see that @xmath173 is not in the support of @xmath309 . if @xmath154 is a sphere with three boundary components or a once - punctured annulus , then we argue in several steps , looking at the bottom - left picture of figure [ one boundary fig ] . if point @xmath158 is the puncture and the other boundary component is not contained in the gray striped area , then @xmath173 is not allowable in definition [ quasi lam def ] . if point @xmath158 is on a boundary component and no marked point off of that boundary component is contained in the gray striped area , then any curve @xmath196 in @xmath309 with @xmath197 positive is isotopic to @xmath173 . thus again @xmath173 is the unique curve in @xmath309 whose shear coordinate @xmath180 is strictly positive , so again @xmath173 is not in the support of @xmath309 . we are left with a unique choice of @xmath173 that might appear in the support of @xmath309 , namely the curve such that the area shaded striped gray contains two boundary components or a boundary component and a puncture . but then @xmath173 would be the unique curve in @xmath309 with shear coordinate @xmath180 strictly positive , so it is not in the support of @xmath309 . theorem [ curve separation ] says that the curve separation property holds , so by proposition [ no 1 2 ] , null tangles of disorder @xmath8 and @xmath7 do not exist . if @xmath154 is a disk with @xmath57 or @xmath8 punctures , then propositions [ null tangle two boundary ] and [ null tangle boundary puncture ] amount to the null tangle property . in the remaining cases , propositions [ null tangle two boundary ] , [ null tangle boundary puncture ] , and [ null tangle one boundary ] show that the support of a null tangle has no curves that involve boundary segments . if @xmath154 is an unpunctured annulus , there is one remaining allowable curve ( the closed curve ) . a null tangle has disorder at most @xmath8 , and therefore has disorder @xmath57 . if @xmath154 is a disk with @xmath7 punctures , then there are five remaining allowable curves : one closed curve and four curves with distinct spiral points . these can be arranged into two sets of pairwise compatible curves . ( group together the two curves with counterclockwise spirals at one of the punctures , group together the two curves with clockwise spirals that same puncture , and put the closed curve in either group . ) a null tangle has disorder at most @xmath7 , and therefore has disorder @xmath57 . if @xmath154 is a once - punctured annulus , then there are four remaining allowable curves : two closed curves and two curves which spiral into the puncture at both ends . a null tangle has disorder at most @xmath7 and thus has disorder @xmath57 . if @xmath154 is a sphere with three boundary components , then the only remaining allowable curves are three compatible closed curves , so a null tangle has disorder at most @xmath8 , and therefore has disorder @xmath57 . the author thanks sergey fomin for helpful converations . the author also thanks an anonymous referee for many helpful comments , and especially for pointing out that an earlier version of ( * ? ? ? * proposition 4.6 ) ( appearing here as proposition [ basis exists ] ) was incorrect . Abstract:

Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.

Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered . Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video . Paper: type i supernovae ( sne i ) are characterized by the lack of prominent hydrogen lines in the spectra ( e.g. , * ? ? ? strong helium lines are present in the spectra of sne ib , while they are practically absent in those of sne ic . sne ib / c are further distinguished from sne ia by the lack of strong siii absorption line at 6355 . most of ordinary sne ib / c , if not all , occur in star - forming galaxies , indicating that sne ib / c have a massive star origin ( e.g. * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? their light curves are dominated by the energy release from radioactive @xmath0ni as in the case of sne ia @xcite , but the inferred amounts of @xmath0ni ejected by sne ib / c are similar , on average , to those of sne ii ( @xmath1;e.g . , @xcite ) rather than sne ia ( @xmath2 ; e.g. @xcite ) . the current consensus is that most of sne ib / c belong to a subset of core - collapse sne that are sn explosions via collapse of the iron cores in massive stars at their deaths . hydrogen can not be easily hidden in sn spectra ( e.g. , * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ) and sn ib / c progenitors must have lost their hydrogen envelopes by the time of explosion . there exist mainly three possible ways for massive stars to become a hydrogen - deficient sn progenitor : mass loss from single stars via stellar winds ( e.g. , * ? ? ? * ) , binary interactions ( e.g. * ? ? ? * ) , and chemically homogeneous evolution with rapid rotation @xcite . the last mode of evolution have been invoked for explaining massive blue stragglers and long gamma - ray bursts within the collapsar scenario @xcite , but is not likely to be much relevant for the majority of sne ib / c that are found in the local universe @xcite . in this review , we focus on ordinary sne ib / c : our objective here is to summarize theoretical results on sn ib / c progenitors via single and binary evolutionary paths . we emphasize that each case has its own unique prediction that can be in principle well tested by observations . sne ib / c can therefore provide an invaluable insight on massive star evolution . note that we restrict this review to the detailed properties of sne ib / c progenitors that are predicted by recent stellar evolution models . progenitors of sn iib ( i.e. , sne of which the spectra have hydrogen lines at early times , but resemble those of sne ib at later times ) are closely related to sn ib / c progenitors , and will also be discussed briefly . our discussions on observations , sn modeling , and stellar population studies will be highly biased by the selected topics we address here . for more general topics on the evolution of massive stars and sn progenitors , readers are referred to the recent reviews by @xcite , @xcite , @xcite , @xcite , @xcite and @xcite . it has been widely believed that wolf - rayet ( wr ) stars are observational counterparts of sne ib / c progenitors ( e.g. * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? although helium stars as wr stars can be produced by binary interactions ( e.g. , * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ) , a large fraction of wr stars are found in isolation @xcite , and must have been produced from massive single stars via mass loss due to stellar winds ( the so - called conti scenario ; @xcite ) . evolutionary models of massive stars with mass loss predict that there exists an initial mass limit for wr stars , above which stars can lose the entire hydrogen envelope during the post main sequence phases ( e.g. * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? a useful constraint on this mass limit can be provided by galactic wr stars . observations indicate that wr stars of wn type in our galaxy have the lower bolometric luminosity limit of @xmath3 @xcite . this roughly corresponds to 10 @xmath4 of a naked helium star , which requires an initial mass of about 25 @xmath4 . stellar evolution models indicate that non - rotating stars at solar metallicity can not lose their hydrogen envelope to become a wr star if @xmath5 @xmath4 , with the most commonly adopted mass loss rate from red supergiant stars given by @xcite . enhancement of mass loss due to rotation or pulsation compared to the de jager rate and some alternative empirical mass loss prescriptions have been invoked to resolve this discrepancy ( e.g. * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? once a star becomes a wr star , further mass loss due to wr winds determines its final mass . in the 80s and 90s , a fixed value of about @xmath6 or mass - dependent values have been widely used for the wr mass loss rate in most evolutionary models @xcite . later studies began to consider the wr mass loss rate as a function of the luminosity and the surface abundances of helium and metals in a more explicit way ( e.g. , * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? more important , with the growing evidence for hydrodynamic clumping of wr wind material , recent estimates for the wr mass loss rate give significantly lower values than previously thought . several different prescriptions for the wr mass loss rate are compared in fig . [ fig : wrwind ] . the single star models produced later than 2000 predict systematically higher final masses of sn ib / c progenitors than those in the 80s and 90s , as summarized in fig . [ fig : finalmass ] . for example , with the langer s mass - dependent wr mass loss rate @xcite , a 60 @xmath4 star at solar metallicity can become a sn ib / c progenitor with an final mass as low as 4.25 @xmath4 @xcite . by contrast the models with the wr mass loss rate of @xcite give final masses higher than 10 @xmath4 , at solar metallicity . this high final mass ( @xmath7 @xmath4 ) has consequences on the sn explosion . first of all , such massive helium stars have large amounts of binding energy . this would make successful explosion of these progenitors difficult : they may collapse to a black hole , without making an ordinary sn ib / c ( e.g. * ? ? ? * and references therein ) . secondly , even if they exploded successfully , the resultant light curves would be too broad to be compatible with observations @xcite . this brings into question the importance of single wr stars as progenitors of sne ib / c at solar metallicity . however , the role of single stars at super - solar metallicity may be significant given their relatively low final masses ( fig . [ fig : finalmass ] ) . ) . the dot - dashed line and the dotted line give the wr mass loss rates by @xcite and @xcite , respectively . the solid line denotes the mass loss rate prescription given by eq . ( 1 ) : the wr mass loss rate by @xcite for @xmath8 and the mass loss rate of relatively low - mass helium stars for @xmath9 , which is based on the extreme helium stars analyzed by @xcite . the blue data points with the error bars are the mass loss rates of these extreme helium stars . the orange point with the error bars denotes the mass loss rate of the quasi - wr star hd 45166 @xcite . the dashed line is 10 times lower than the solid line : @xmath10 is the reduction factor compared to the mass loss rate given by eq . ( 1 ) . ] , asterisk : rotating models of @xcite at @xmath11 , star : rotating models of @xcite at @xmath12 with a metallicity dependent wr mass loss rate . triangle : non - rotating models of @xcite at @xmath11 , square : non - rotating models of @xcite at @xmath11 . ] wr stars have large convective cores , being close to the eddington limit , and rapidly lose the outer helium - rich layers by wr winds . this makes them almost chemically homogeneous . therefore , stellar evolution models predict that wr stars evolve systematically bluewards on the hr diagram ( e.g. , * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ) , in contrast to the case of the evolution of hydrogen - rich stars which evolve redwards in general . the surface composition of chemical elements also evolves . first , as the residual of the hydrogen envelope is removed by winds , they evolve from wnl type to wn type . as they lose more mass , the products of helium burning including carbon and oxygen begin to appear at the surface , to become wc and wo stars ( fig . [ fig : surface ] ) . the general consensus is that wr stars from sufficiently high initial masses evolve according to the following order : wnl @xmath13 wn @xmath13 wc @xmath13 wo . in this scenario , wr stars should become more compact as they evolve from wnl to wo . indeed , wnl and wo stars in our galaxy have lowest and highest surface temperatures , respectively , in agreement with the theoretical prediction @xcite . but stellar evolution models have great difficulty in explaining many of the surface properties of wr stars . in particular , the observed wr stars are found to have much larger radii and lower surface temperatures than what the evolutionary models predict ( e.g. , * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? the reason for this discrepancy is not well understood yet . inflation of the envelope with a density inversion is observed in wr star models near the eddington limit in hydrostatic equilibrium @xcite , but this is still not sufficient to fit observations as seen in fig . [ fig : hr ] . a recent suggestion is that the observationally implied inflation of wr stars may result from density inhomogeneities and the consequent enhancement of opacity in the sub - surface convective layer @xcite . this envelope inflation affects the bolometric correction , making wr stars fairly luminous in the optical ( @xmath14 ) . if the optical luminosities of the observed wr stars represented those of sn ib / c progenitors at the pre - sn stage , the previous search for a sn ib / c progenitor in pre - sn images would have been successful @xcite . as of today , only one tentative identification has been reported with the sn ib iptf13bvn @xcite . all of the other searches for sn ib / c progenitors have failed , even for the case with a very deep detection limit ( @xmath15 ; @xcite ) . this result has often been interpreted as evidence for binary star progenitors @xcite . it should be noted that the majority of the observed wr stars must be on the helium main sequence , which is still far from the final evolutionary stage . after core helium exhaustion , the evolution of the core in a wr star is dominated by neutrino cooling and undergoes rapid kelvin - helmoltz contraction . with a sufficient amount of helium in the envelope , this would lead to further expansion of the helium envelope due to the so - called mirror effect . however , single wr stars would rapidly lose helium in the envelope as implied by the high mass loss rate , and the overall radius would gradually decrease as the stellar evolution models predict . at the pre - sn stage , many wr stars would tend to become very hot , and optically faint like wo stars despite their very high bolometric luminosities @xcite . this means that the non - detection of most sn ib / c progenitors in the previous attempts does not necessarily exclude single wr progenitors , and other constraints like ejecta masses of sne ib / c should also be taken into account to better understand the nature of sne ib / c progenitors . helium star at @xmath11 , with the wr mass loss rate by @xcite . the calculation was terminated at the end of core neon burning . ] the production of he i lines is found to depend both on the total he mass @xcite and on the helium distribution in the envelope @xcite . non - thermal excitation and ionization of helium also play the key role for the formation of helium lines in sne ib @xcite . this does not only require presence of helium in the progenitors , but also strong chemical mixing between helium in the envelope and radioactive @xmath0ni produced in the innermost region of the sn ejecta @xcite . we still do not know exactly how much helium is needed for sne ib . this limit must depend on the degree of mixing of helium and nickel , which may in turn depend on the detailed structure of the progenitor and the energy and asymmetry of the explosion . many authors simply assume a certain amount of helium ( e.g. , 0.5 - 0.6 @xmath4 ) as the lower limit for sn ib progenitors ( e.g. * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? recently @xcite suggested 0.14 @xmath4 as the maximum possible amount of helium that can be hidden in the sn spectra , based on a spectroscopic study of several sn ib / c with relatively low inferred ejecta masses . in the most recent single star models @xcite , the total amounts of helium in sn ib / c progenitors range from 0.28 @xmath4 to 2.2 @xmath4 . this is significantly higher than the proposed limit of 0.14 @xmath4 by hachinger et al . in fact , helium mass as low as 0.14 @xmath4 is very difficult to achieve with stellar evolution models . @xcite found that a 60 @xmath4 star can become a 4.25 @xmath4 sn ib / c progenitor with a wr mass loss rate much higher than nowadays adopted , but even in this extreme case , the remaining helium mass was as large as 0.18 @xmath4 . the reason for this difficulty is largely related to the dynamical adjustment of the stellar structure of wr stars with mass loss . as shown in fig . [ fig : kipp1 ] as an example , the size of the helium - burning convective core in a wr star decreases as the wr star loses mass by winds ( fig . [ fig : kipp1 ] ) , and therefore some amount of helium can remain unburned until the end of core helium burning even if more than half of the initial mass is lost . the residual helium could be completely removed with efficient mass loss during the later evolutionary stages . the current models predict , however , that the effect of mass loss during the post helium burning phases is relatively minor mainly because of the relatively short evolutionary time . we discuss the problem of helium in sne ib / c progenitors in sect . [ sect : binaryhe ] in more detail . the mass fraction of helium in the outermost layers can also play an important role for the early time light curves and spectra of sne ib / c . @xcite showed that if the helium mass fraction is sufficiently large ( @xmath16 ) , he i lines can be produced without the contribution of non - thermal processes for several days after the shock breakout , while no helium lines are seen for a low helium mass fraction ( @xmath17 ) even with a total helium mass of about 1 @xmath4 . therefore , he i lines during the early epoch of a sn ib / c will provide an important constraint on the progenitor . recent single star models in the literature predict that helium mass fraction at the surface of sn ib / c progenitors is below 0.4 except for a limited initial mass range above the critical mass for wr star progenitors ( e.g. , * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ) , in contrast to the case of binary star models that predict the majority of sn ib / c progenitors have a surface helium mass fraction higher than 0.9 ( sect . [ sect : binaryhe ] ) . given that the total amount of helium is also systematically smaller in single star models than in binary star models as discussed below , this implies that single star evolution is probably prone to sne ic . helium star , for which the nugis & lamers wr mass loss rate was adopted . the helium - burning convective core is marked by the hatched lines . the black solid line marks the surface of the star . the calculation was terminated at the end of core neon burning . ] super - luminous supernovae ( slsne ) and very energetic explosions like gamma - ray bursts ( grbs ) can be driven by rapid rotation . the most commonly invoked mechanisms for these events include the collapsar scenario @xcite and the magnetar scenario ( e.g. * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? so far , all of the supernovae associated with grbs belong to type ic @xcite , and many slsne are also found to be sne ic . while the collapsar scenario still remains most popular to explain grbs @xcite , the magnetar - driven explosion is nowadays the most invoked mechanism for the slsne ic ( e.g. , * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? the contending mechanism for slsne ic is the pair - production instability ( e.g. * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? it is still a matter of debate which evolutionary channels of sne ib / c progenitors can lead to rotation - driven explosions like grbs and slsne - ic . observations indicate that the majority of massive stars on the main sequence are rapid rotators , where the necessary condition for both collapsar and magnetar mechanism could be fulfilled if they retained the angular momentum until the pre - collapse stage ( e.g. , * ? ? ? however , massive stars may undergo angular momentum redistribution via mass loss due to stellar winds and/or binary interactions , and the transport of angular momentum @xcite . the angular momentum transfer may occur on a dynamical timescale in convective layers by convection . in radiative layers , rotationally - induced hydrodynamic instabilities like the shear instability and eddington - sweet circulations may transport angular momentum @xcite . dynamo actions may also occur in radiative layers according to the so - called tayler - spruit dynamo theory @xcite , which may cause strong magnetic torques across differentially rotating layers . theoretical studies indicate that , without magnetic fields , angular momentum transport is severely inhibited by the chemical stratification across the boundary between the stellar core and the hydrogen envelope ( @xmath18-barrier ; @xcite ) . single star progenitors of sne ib / c can thus retain a significant amount of angular momentum until the pre - sn stage , even though most of the initial angular momentum is lost by stellar winds @xcite : the predicted amounts of angular momentum in the cores are much more than what neutron stars can have at the break - up velocity , and enough to produce a long gamma - ray burst ( grb ) within the collapsar scenario @xcite . this means that almost all sn ib / c progenitors have enough angular momentum to form grb / slsn - ic progenitors . given that rapid rotation is only one necessary condition for collapsar / magnetar production , this should not necessarily lead to the conclusion that non - magnetic models predict too many grbs and slsne - ic compared to the observation . however , because such exotic explosions belong to a subset of sne ib / c , the result of non - magnetic models implies that grbs and slsne - ic should occur more frequently at higher metallicity as ordinary sne ib / c do , if mass loss by winds provided the main evolutionary path for their progenitors . contrary to this expectation , observations indicate that low - metallicity is preferred for both grbs and slsne - ic ( e.g. , * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? magnetic torques can easily overcome the hindrance by the chemical stratification to the transport of angular momentum . magnetic models with the tayler - spruit dynamo predict that single wr stars rotate too slowly to produce a magnetar / collapsar @xcite . this is consistent with the fact that grbs and slsne - ic are very rare . magnetic models also better explain the spin rates of young millisecond pulsars . several authors have questioned the validity of the talyer - spruit dynamo theory @xcite and we still can not draw any solid conclusion on which case between magnetic and non - magnetic models better represents the reality . however , it is not only massive stars but also intermediate- and low - mass stars that provide evidence for very efficient transport of angular momentum in the radiative layers . such examples include slow rotation of isolated white dwarfs @xcite , the radial velocity profile in the sun @xcite , and recent asteroseismic results of low - mass stars @xcite . our tentative conclusion is that some strong braking mechanism like the tayler - spruit dynamo is actually working in stars , and that magnetic models may better explain recent observations in general . the role of magnetic fields on the evolution of stars still remains a very challenging subject of future study . some other mechanisms like baroclinic instability @xcite and pulsational instabilities @xcite may also play an important role for the transport of angular momentum , but have not been extensively studied for massive stars yet . the majority of massive stars form in binary systems ( e.g. , see * ? ? ? * for a recent observational analysis on the population of binary systems ) . a large fraction of them are believed to experience binary interactions during the course of their evolution , mainly due to the increase of stellar radius . once the more massive star ( the primary star ) fills the roche lobe in a binary system , mass transfer to the less massive star ( the secondary star ) begins . mass transfer can be unstable if the mass ratio of the stellar components ( i.e. , @xmath19 where @xmath20 and @xmath21 are the masses of the primary and secondary stars , respectively ) is sufficiently small . unstable mass transfer will lead the binary system to a contact phase , which may eventually make the stellar components merge to become a single star . although binary mergers are related to many important topics like stellar rotation , peculiar sne and long gamma - ray bursts @xcite , here we focus our discussion on non - merging systems that can produce ordinary sne ib / c . recent analyses also indicate that the fraction of stable binary systems is much higher than previously believed @xcite , and thus the event rate of sne ib / c can be well explained by binary progenitors @xcite . in the literature , mass transfer is often categorized into case a , case b and case c , depending on the evolutionary stage of the primary star when it fills the roche lobe @xcite , as the following : * case a mass transfer : mass transfer during the main sequence . * case b mass transfer : mass transfer during the helium core contraction phase . * case c mass transfer : mass transfer during the core helium burning and later evolutionary stages . some binary systems may undergo multiple mass transfer phases , depending on the initial orbital periods and masses of the stellar components . the mass transfer phases that follow case a / b mass transfer are often denoted as the following : * case ab mass transfer : mass transfer from the primary star that has previously undergone the case a mass transfer , during the helium core contraction phase . * case bb mass transfer : mass transfer from the primary star that has previously undergone case b mass transfer , during the late evolutionary stages ( mostly after core helium exhaustion for sn ib / c progenitors ) . * case abb mass transfer : mass transfer from the primary star that has previously undergone case ab mass transfer , during the late evolutionary stages ( mostly after core helium exhaustion for sn ib / c progenitors ) . helium stars as sn ib / c progenitors can be made via case b / ab mass transfer as illustrated in fig . [ fig : binary ] . the initial mass of such a helium star corresponds to the helium core mass ( @xmath22 ) of the primary star at the onset of case b / ab mass transfer . for case b systems , @xmath22 can be given by a well - defined function of the zams mass of the primary star as shown in fig . [ fig : mimf ] . the evolution of the helium stars produced via case b / ab mass transfer largely depends on their masses . stellar evolution models indicate that case bb / abb mass transfer occurs when the primary star becomes a helium giant if the helium star mass is initially less than about 3.5 - 4.0 @xmath4 , depending on the adopted mass loss rate and metallicity . more massive helium stars do not interact anymore with the secondary stars after case b / ab mass transfer , but can still lose mass further by winds . wr winds may be induced if the helium star mass is sufficiently high ( @xmath23 @xmath4 ) but the mass loss rate from less massive helium stars is not well constrained observationally because such relatively low - mass helium stars have been rarely observed ( see sects . [ sect : binarymass ] and [ sect : counterpart ] below for more discussions ) . it is not only the primary star , but also the secondary star that can produce a sn ib / c . in a close binary system , the primary star will leave a compact star remnant if it explodes as a sn ib / c via case b / ab / bb / abb mass transfer , or if it becomes a white dwarf via case bb / abb mass transfer ( see fig . [ fig : binary ] ) . unless the binary system is unbound by a strong neutron star kick , it will form a common envelope after the core hydrogen exhaustion in the secondary star . a short - period binary system consisting of a helium star plus a compact star ( white dwarf , neutron star , or black hole ) will be produced after the common envelope ejection . explosion of the helium star will then produce a sn ib / c . note also that fig . [ fig : binary ] still does not depict all the possible binary paths for sne ib / c , and there may exist other relatively rare channels . for example , some authors found that with case a mass transfer , the sn order can be reversed for a limited parameter space : the secondary star first explode as a sn ib / c , followed by sn ib / c explosion of the primary star as a helium star in isolation or in a compact binary system with a neutron star companion , depending on the impact of the neutron star kick @xcite . the contribution of each evolutionary path to the total production of sne ib / c may depend on several physical parameters . they include the so - called mass accretion efficiency ( i.e , the ratio of the accreted mass onto the secondary star to the transferred mass from the primary star ) , the specific angular momentum of any matter that is not accreted on the secondary star but lost from the binary system , distribution of neutron star kick velocities , and the common envelope ejection efficiency ( e.g. * ? ? ? it is beyond the scope of this review to discuss all the details regarding binary population with respect to sne ib / c , and readers are referred to @xcite , @xcite , @xcite , as well as the contribution by s.e . de mink in this issue . here , it may be sufficient to say that the dominant channel to sne ib / c in binary systems is the case b / bb , among others @xcite . in the sections below , we focus on the detailed properties of sn ib / c progenitors predicted from evolutionary models . to model the evolution of a binary system , we have to consider the change of the orbit due to stellar winds , mass transfer and/or gravitational wave radiation , and mass exchange between the stellar components via mass transfer . to investigate the effect of rotation , angular momentum exchange between stars and the orbit via tidal synchronization and the spin - up effect of the secondary during the mass transfer phases should also be followed ( see * ? ? ? * for a recent review ) . many evolutionary models of massive binary stars have been presented in the literature , but only a limited number of studies aimed at detailed investigation of the structure of sne ib / c progenitors near / at the pre - sn stage @xcite . before we summarize the main results of these studies , we give an example for the evolution of relatively low - mass sn ib / c progenitors , which is very different from that of massive wr stars . the evolution of a sn ib / c progenitor having @xmath24 @xmath4 in a case bb system is illustrated in figs . [ fig : hr2 ] and [ fig : kippen ] . after case b mass transfer , the primary star becomes a hot and compact helium star . the surface hydrogen and helium mass fraction at this stage is about 0.28 and 0.7 , respectively and a small amount of hydrogen of about 0.05 @xmath4 is still retained in the outermost layer . as a result , the convective helium burning core can grow with hydrogen shell burning even though the total mass somewhat decreases due to mass loss by winds ( fig . [ fig : kippen ] ) . this is contrasted to the case of mass - losing pure helium stars where the convective helium burning core shrinks in size in terms of the mass coordinate ( fig . [ fig : kipp1 ] ) . during the post - helium burning stages , the helium envelope rapidly expands and case bb mass transfer is initiated when carbon burning begins in the core ( figs . [ fig : hr2 ] and [ fig : kippen ] ) . the sn explosion will occur when the surface temperature becomes fairly low ( @xmath25 , fig . [ fig : hr2 ] ) while the star is still undergoing case bb mass transfer . this is in stark contrast to the case of massive wr star progenitors that evolve bluewards throughout and explode when they become very hot ( @xmath26 ; fig . [ fig : hr ] ) . the helium envelope expansion makes this binary progenitor bright in the optical bands compared to the case of wr progenitors , as discussed below ( sect . [ sect : binarysurface ] ) . of course , more massive progenitors having @xmath27 will become a wr star even in binary systems after case b / ab transfer , and evolve like a single wr star thereafter . plus 14 @xmath4 stars with the initial period of 5 days . convective layers are marked by green hatched lines , and semi - convection layers by red dots . the surface of the star is indicated by the black solid line . the blue and pink color shading marks net energy gain or loss from nuclear energy generation and neutrino emission . ] as mentioned above , one of the biggest uncertainties in the evolution of sn ib / c progenitors is the mass loss rate of naked helium stars . the mass loss rate of wr stars ( @xmath28 ) is relatively well known , but less luminous helium stars have not been well studied observationally . several authors therefore used extrapolated values of the nugis & lamers rate or the langer rate ( see fig . [ fig : wrwind ] ) for the whole possible range of helium star mass @xcite . on the other hand , @xcite and @xcite used a significantly reduced mass loss rate for @xmath29 as the following : @xmath30[eqhewind ] here the wr mass loss rate for @xmath31 is given by @xcite . the prescription for less luminous helium stars ( @xmath29 ) is based on the observations of extreme helium stars by @xcite . [ fig : wrwind ] indicates that the simple extrapolation of the wr mass loss rate down to @xmath32 may lead to a significant overestimate even with the nugis & lamers rate , which is about 10 times lower than that of @xcite for @xmath31 . given that the stellar wind mass loss rates of massive stars were usually overestimated before the late-90s ( see sect . [ sect : singlemass ] above ) , mass - loss rates reduced by a certain factor ( @xmath10 ) compared to that of eq . ( 1 ) were applied for some binary models of ( * ? ? ? * @xmath33 ) and for all the models of ( * ? ? ? * @xmath34 ) . note that the case of @xmath35 , for which the mass loss rate becomes comparable to the nugis & lamers rate with @xmath31 , is still compatible with the observation of extreme helium stars of @xmath29 ( fig . [ fig : wrwind ] ) . the caveat is that the extreme helium stars in the figure are giant stars at a pre - white dwarf stage , having masses of only about 0.8 @xmath4 @xcite , and can not represent ordinary sn ib / c progenitors . on the other hand , the quasi - wr star hd 45166 is currently one of the most promising observational counterparts of relatively low - mass helium stars on the helium main sequence ( sect . [ sect : counterpart ] ) . its mass is about 4.2 @xmath4 with a surface helium mass fraction of 0.5 and surface luminosity of @xmath36 . this star is likely on the helium main sequence . the estimated mass loss rate gives a better agreement with the extrapolated value of the nugis & lamers rate than the mass loss rates of extreme helium stars of @xcite . but we still have only one sample for such relatively low - mass helium stars in the core helium burning phase , and can not make a solid conclusion on which mass loss prescription is best suited for our purpose . as shown in fig . [ fig : finalmass2 ] , however , this uncertainty does not make a great difference in terms of the final masses . the predicted final masses of sn ib / c progenitors that undergo case b / bb mass transfer are given by fig . [ fig : finalmass2 ] . the models in the figure , for which the considered initial period of the orbit ranges from 4 to 7 days , were taken from @xcite and @xcite . in @xcite , conservative mass transfer ( i.e. , the mass accretion efficiency @xmath37 , which is the ratio of the transferred matter from the primary to the accreted matter onto the secondary , equals to 1.0 ) was assumed and rotation was not taken into account . @xcite considered the effects of rotation , with which @xmath37 is self - regulated by the interplay between the mass transfer from the primary star and the mass - loss enhancement due to rotation from the secondary star that is spun - up by mass and angular momentum accretion . these models indicate @xmath38 for case a mass transfer and @xmath39 for case b mass transfer , respectively . for case b systems , the final masses converge to about 3.15 @xmath4 with @xmath40 and gradually increases with increasing @xmath41 for @xmath42 5 and 10 . the result with the nugis & lamers rate is comparable to that with @xmath35 . for @xmath43 @xmath4 , helium stars produced by case b mass transfer undergoes case bb mass transfer during carbon burning and later phases . consequently the final masses for case bb systems decrease more rapidly from this point with decreasing @xmath41 , and the lower boundary of the zams mass for sn ib / c progenitors becomes about 12.5 @xmath4 , below which the primary star becomes a white dwarf . in a case a system , the primary star loses a significant fraction of the initial mass on the main sequence , and the helium core mass at the end of core hydrogen burning becomes lower than the corresponding case b system . this makes the lower limit of zams mass for sne ib / c shift to about 16 @xmath4 for case a systems @xcite . very short orbits ( typically @xmath44 ) are required for case a systems , and their contribution to the sne ib / c rate from binary systems may be smaller by about a factor of 3 4 than that of case b systems ( cf . * ? ? ? these minimum zams mass limits for sne ib / c ( i.e. , 12.5 @xmath4 and 16 @xmath4 for case b and case a , respectively ) are significantly higher than for sne iip from single stars , which is about 8 - 9 @xmath4 @xcite . note that binary interactions can make this limit for sn iip lowered even down to about 4 @xmath4 : for example , mergers of 4 @xmath4 plus 4 @xmath4 star would make a 8 @xmath4 sn iip progenitor . therefore , the stronger association of sne ib / c with younger stellar populations than sne iip in their host galaxies ( e.g. , * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ) is in qualitative agreement with the binary scenario . according to recent analyses of sn light curves @xcite , sne ib / c have typically ejecta masses of 1 @xmath4 6 @xmath4 . this means that , assuming the remnant mass of 1.4 @xmath4 , the final masses of ordinary sne ib / c range from 2.4 @xmath4 to 7.4 @xmath4 at least . if some amounts of helium were hidden in these analyses as argued by @xcite , the actual final mass would be somewhat higher . this observation is not compatible with the case of @xmath45 in fig . [ fig : finalmass2 ] , which predicts too low ejecta masses on average . the results with lower mass loss rates give a better agreement : stars of @xmath46 14 @xmath4 - 35 @xmath4 can explain the observed ejecta mass range with @xmath35 and the nugis & lamers rate for example . @xcite also gives a similar conclusion from the comparison of their stellar population model with the observation . the effect of different values of @xmath10 can be regarded as the metallicity effect , because both observations and theories indicate that wr mass loss becomes stronger for higher metallicity @xcite . the result in fig . [ fig : finalmass2 ] implies that sn ib / c ejecta should be systematically more massive for lower metallicity , which can be tested by observations . if there were a certain mass cut for the boundary between successful sn explosion and black hole formation in terms of the final mass , this metallicity dependence of final masses would lead to gradual decrease of the sn ib / c rate for decreasing metallicity ( cf . * ; * ? ? ? for example , if @xmath47 @xmath4 were the lower limit for bh formation , we would not expect a sn ib / c explosion from @xmath48 @xmath4 at solar metallicity ( @xmath49 ) and @xmath50 @xmath4 at smc metallicity ( @xmath51 ) , respectively . denotes the reduction factor that are applied to the mass loss rate given by eq . ( 1 ) : @xmath52 10 and 20 roughly corresponds to solar and smc metallicity , respectively . the presented results are based on the full binary models by @xcite for @xmath45 and the binary models and pure helium star models by @xcite for the others . the boundary line between case b and bb systems is marked by the dashed line . the data with @xmath53 @xmath4 in @xcite is based on the full binary evolution calculations but it is based on pure helium star models for @xmath54 @xmath4 assuming that the pure helium star was produced via case b mass transfer from the primary star with the corresponding zams mass in a binary system . see @xcite for more details . the result with the wr mass loss rate by @xcite at solar metallicity from unpublished binary star models ( yoon , s .- c . , in prep ) is marked by the green dashed line , for which the boundary for case b and bb shifts to about @xmath55 @xmath4 . ] as discussed in sect . [ sect : singlehe ] , the amount of helium retained in progenitors may be one of the key factors that make the difference between sne ib and sne ic . as shown in fig . [ fig : hemass ] , helium mass varies from 0.1 to 1.9 for the considered range of zams mass and mass loss rates in case b / bb systems . helium mass ( @xmath56 ) as a function of @xmath41 has a local maximum at @xmath57 @xmath4 for @xmath42 1 and 5 , and at @xmath58 @xmath4 for @xmath42 20 , respectively . the rapid decrease of @xmath56 as @xmath41 approaches 12 @xmath4 results from case bb mass transfer , while the gradual decrease of @xmath56 with increasing @xmath41 is the effect of the increasing mass loss rate . it is important to note that , even for the case of very strong mass loss ( i.e. , @xmath45 ) , the amounts of helium at the pre - sn stage are significantly greater than the upper limit of @xmath59 @xmath4 for sne ic that was suggested by @xcite , except for the extreme case bb case at around @xmath60 @xmath4 . therefore , both single and binary star models can not fulfill the condition of low amounts of helium for sn ic . this might mean that , in reality , the chemical mixing between helium and nickel in sn ejecta is not as efficient as considered by @xcite for most sne ic ( cf . * ? ? ? * ) such that more helium could be hidden . such inefficient mixing is not usually supported by observations ( e.g. , * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ) , but we need a systematic study on how the mixing efficiency via the rayleigh - taylor instability depends on the pre - sn structure of sne ib / c progenitors to resolve this issue . mass loss from helium stars is another uncertain factor that should be better understood . in particular , some helium stars can closely approach the eddington limit during the final evolutionary stages if the mass is high enough . this might make the surface layers unstable to cause rapid mass eruption ( cf . * ; * ? ? ? * ) , thus removing most of helium in the envelope shortly before the sn explosion as evidenced by many sne ib / c @xcite . @xcite assumed a certain value of the ratio of the helium mass to the ejecta mass ( @xmath61 ) as the demarcation criterion between sn ib and sn ic . because the chemical mixing between helium and nickel plays an important role for having helium lines in sn spectra , using @xmath61 instead of @xmath56 may be appropriate because a lower value of @xmath61 means that helium can be more easily shielded from the gamma - ray photons produced in the innermost nickel - rich layer of the sn ejecta . interestingly , fig . [ fig : hemass ] indicates that @xmath61 does not depend on the adopted mass loss rate ( hence on metallicity ) as strongly as @xmath56 does . this is because , for a lower mass loss rate , the final mass and the co core mass become higher and compensate the higher helium mass . this has important consequences in the prediction of sn ib / c rate as a function of metallicity as discussed in sect . [ sect : fate ] below . denotes the reduction factor that are applied to the mass loss rate given by eq . ( 1 ) ( see the figure caption of fig . [ fig : finalmass2 ] ) . the nl rate means the wr mass loss rate by @xcite . the data were taken from @xcite for @xmath45 , @xcite for @xmath52 5 , 10 and 20 , and unpublished models by yoon ( in prep . ) for the nl rate . _ lower panel _ : the corresponding ratios of the helium to ejecta mass . here we assumed that the remnant neutron star mass is 1.4 @xmath4 . see fig . [ fig : finalmass2 ] for the corresponding final mass.,title="fig : " ] denotes the reduction factor that are applied to the mass loss rate given by eq . ( 1 ) ( see the figure caption of fig . [ fig : finalmass2 ] ) . the nl rate means the wr mass loss rate by @xcite . the data were taken from @xcite for @xmath45 , @xcite for @xmath52 5 , 10 and 20 , and unpublished models by yoon ( in prep . ) for the nl rate . _ lower panel _ : the corresponding ratios of the helium to ejecta mass . here we assumed that the remnant neutron star mass is 1.4 @xmath4 . see fig . [ fig : finalmass2 ] for the corresponding final mass.,title="fig : " ] if relatively low - mass helium star progenitors in binary systems have helium masses of about 1 - 1.5 @xmath4 in their envelopes as the most recent models predict , this may lead to an early plateau phase due to helium recombination for several days as shown by @xcite . this prediction has recently been tentatively confirmed with the early - time light curve of sn ib 2006lc @xcite . even in the absence of non - thermal effects , helium lines will also be observed during this phase , given that the mass fraction of helium in the envelope is very high ( @xmath62 ; see sect . [ sect : singlehe ] ) . on the other hand , sn ib / c progenitors with a compact star companion ( see fig . [ fig : binary ] ) may undergo very strong mass transfer after core helium exhaustion , because these systems have a small mass ratio and short orbital period . most of the helium envelope can be stripped off in this case , and very little helium will be left at the pre - sn stage @xcite . this evolutionary channel has been often invoked to explain sne ic having low ejecta masses and fast declining light curves ( e.g. , * ? ? ? * ) , including some ultra - faint sne ic @xcite . the frequency of such events would be rare compared to ordinary sne ib / c , and its quantitative prediction heavily depends on the uncertain parameters related to the common envelope efficiency and neutron star kick . case b / ab mass transfer in a binary system stops when the hydrogen envelope of the primary star is almost stripped off , but it does not completely remove hydrogen . the amount of hydrogen remaining in the outermost layers of the helium core immediately after the mass transfer phase is typically @xmath63 @xmath4 . @xcite found that the final amount of hydrogen at the pre - sn stage is a function of the progenitor mass as the following . at solar metallicity , which roughly corresponds to the case with @xmath64 in figs . [ fig : finalmass2 ] and [ fig : hemass ] ( see also fig . [ fig : wrwind ] ) , no hydrogen will be left for helium stars having final masses of @xmath65 @xmath4 . for the case of @xmath66 @xmath4 , case bb / abb mass transfer becomes efficient enough to completely remove hydrogen . for the final mass range in - between , the remaining hydrogen until sn explosion will be about @xmath67 @xmath4 . on the other hand , the models with the nugis and lamers mass loss rate at solar metallicity lose all the hydrogen in the envelope for the whole mass range ( @xcite ; yoon , s .- c . in prep ) . therefore , in principle , the signature of hydrogen in sn ib / c progenitors can indirectly constrain the mass loss rate from helium stars if we have good information about the metallicity in the vicinity of the sn site . this small amount of hydrogen can be easily detected in the early time spectra of the resulting sn @xcite , in which case it will be identified as a sn iib ( cf . these progenitors have relatively small radii ( @xmath68 ) compared to the yellow - supergiant sn iib progenitors ( e.g. * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ) produced via case c mass transfer @xcite , and may belong to the compact category of sn iib @xcite . some authors argue that several sne classified as type ib also have weak hydrogen absorption lines at high velocity @xcite . therefore , whether the explosion of a helium star having a thin hydrogen layer may be recognized as sn iib or sn ib depends on the details of the sn observation . the progenitor mass range for which a thin hydrogen layer is present at the pre - sn stage becomes widened and the total amount of remaining hydrogen increases with decreasing metallicity . the ratio of sn ib / c to sn iib rate should decrease with decreasing metallicity ( fig . [ fig : fate ] ) . from the above discussion , we can make a crude prediction on the sn types from case b / bb mass systems as summarized in fig . [ fig : fate ] . with case ab / abb systems , each boundary in the figure would simply shift to a higher @xmath41 . for example , the lower limit of @xmath41 for sn ib / c from case b / bb systems is about 12.5 @xmath4 , while it is about 16 @xmath4 for case ab / abb systems . because we still do not have any clear demarcation between sn ib and sn ic in terms of the progenitor structure ( sect . [ sect : binaryhe ] ) , ad - hoc assumptions of @xmath69 @xmath4 ( case i ) and @xmath70 ( case ii ) were made for the upper and lower panels , respectively . several interesting predictions can be made from this figure , which should be tested in future observations . these predictions are only relevant for ordinary sne ib / c and those associated with grbs or slsne - ic are not considered here . * for case i , the ratio of sn ic to sn ib rate from binary systems would decrease with decreasing metallicity in good agreement with @xcite and @xcite , and sn ic is hardly expected at sufficiently low metallicity . by contrast , this ratio would not necessarily decrease for decreasing metallicity with case ii , unless there existed a mass cut of @xmath41 for bh formation ( @xmath71 ) . if sn ib / c progenitors with a sufficiently high final mass could not produce an ordinary sn ib / c , the sn ic rate would significantly decrease with decreasing metallicity even with case ii . * for case ii , sne ic with hydrogen or sne iic are expected to occur at sufficiently low metallicity ( cf . @xcite indeed showed that sne iic can be produced if helium is effectively shielded from radioactive nickel . * the sn ib / sn iib ratio would decrease with decreasing metallicity for both cases , which is in good agreement with the recent observation by @xcite . * comparison of fig . [ fig : finalmass2 ] and fig . [ fig : fate ] implies that both the initial and final masses of sne ic progenitors would be systematically higher than those of sn ib progenitors , regardless of the adopted demarcation criterion of helium . this prediction is in qualitative agreement with sn observations @xcite and the stronger association of sne ic with younger stellar population than sne ib in the host galaxies ( e.g. , * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ) . * for case ii , the average ejecta masses would increase following the order of sn ib , iib and ic at sufficiently low metallicity . * the average ejecta masses of sn ib / c would increase with decreasing metallicity . this effect would be more dramatic for sne ic than for sne ib ( see fig . [ fig : finalmass2 ] ) . * the comparison of fig . [ fig : finalmass2 ] and fig . [ fig : fate ] indicates that for case ii , the maximum final mass of sn ib ( and iib ) would be limited to a fairly small value ( about 7.0 @xmath4 with the assumed value of @xmath70 ) even for very low metallicity . as explained in sect . [ sect : binaryexample ] , a relatively low - mass helium star progenitor of sn ib / c in binary systems undergo rapid expansion of its envelope during the carbon burning phase and later stages . this envelope expansion becomes stronger for a lower mass star for which the carbon - oxygen core becomes more compact , following the mirror effect @xcite . within the framework discussed in sect . [ sect : fate ] , therefore , sne ib progenitors would have a more extended envelope than sn ic progenitors for most cases , which may in turn lead a more luminous early plateau in the consequent sn @xcite . the extended envelope at the pre - sn stage can make a sn ib / c progenitor fairly bright in the optical . the expected visual magnitude is about @xmath72 for the progenitors having final masses of 3 5 @xmath4 ( @xcite ) . with an o - type star companion , the visual brightness would be even higher ( @xmath73 ) . by contrast , wr star progenitors ( @xmath27 @xmath4 ) from both single and binary stars have much higher bolometric luminosities , but the expected high surface temperatures at the pre - sn stage result in fainter visual brightness ( i.e. , @xmath74 * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ) in most cases , which would make them more difficult to directly identify in pre - sn images as discussed in sect . [ sect : singlesurface ] . recently , @xcite have reported the tentative identification of the progenitor of the sn ib iptf13bvn . the estimated absolute magnitudes of the object in the optical range from -5.0 to -7 , depending on the filters , adopted extinction values , and photometry methods @xcite . @xcite argued for a single star progenitor with initial masses of 31 - 35 @xmath4 based on the non - rotating models of the geneva group . unlike more massive stars that become wo stars at the end , these models end their lives as wn stars having relatively thick helium envelopes with surface temperatures of about @xmath75 . the predicted optical magnitudes ( @xmath76 ) agree with the observation , but the final mass ( @xmath77 @xmath4 ) seems to be too high , compared to the estimated ejecta mass of the sn ( @xmath78 @xmath4 ; @xcite ) that supports the binary scenario . the optical brightness of the progenitor candidate can also be explained by a binary progenitor having an initial mass of 10 - 20 @xmath4 @xcite . if future observations find evidence for the companion star that survives the sn explosion , it will directly confirm a binary star origin of sne ib for the first time . massive stars in a close binary system before mass transfer are likely to be synchronized with the orbit because of the short tidal interaction timescale . after case b / ab mass transfer , the orbit becomes too wide to keep the tidal synchronization , and the final rotation velocity of the primary star is mainly determined by the amount of angular momentum that is retained after the mass transfer phase . binary evolution models including the effects of rotation indicate that sn ib / c progenitors via case b / ab mass transfers are slow rotators as they lose mass and angular momentum @xcite . both models with and without magnetic torques due to the tayler - spruit dynamo ( see sect . [ sect : singlerot ] for the discussion on angular momentum redistribution inside stars ) predict that the surface rotation velocity of naked helium stars on the helium main sequence after the mass transfer phase is only about @xmath79 . the specific angular momentum in the innermost region of 1.4 @xmath4 that would collapse to a neutron star significantly according to the prescription of angular momentum transfer @xcite . models without the tayler - spruit dynamo predict that neutron stars from sne ib / c in binary systems would almost reach the critical rotation . this means that the majority of sn ib / c progenitors in binary systems would also be good progenitor candidates for magnetars / collapsars without the talyer - spruit dynamo , which can not be easily reconciled with observations . models with the tayler - spruit dynamo predict that the specific angular momentum of the collapsing core would be comparable to those of single star models ( i.e. , @xmath80 ) and the resultant neutron stars would be rotating at a period of several milliseconds . as in the case of single stars , therefore , binary models with the tayler - spruit dynamo do not predict magentar / collapsar progenitors for energetic sne and/or long grbs via the standard case b / bb / ab / abb systems @xcite under normal circumstances . at sufficiently low metallicity , however , mass accreting stars in case b mass transfer systems may be spun up to undergo the chemically homogeneous evolution , which may end up as a grb @xcite . sn ib / c progenitors in very close binary systems consisting of a helium star and a low - mass main sequence star / compact object ( cf . fig . [ fig : binary ] ; sect . [ sect : binaryexample ] ) may experience strong tidal interaction , given that the orbital period can be as short as 0.1 day in this case ( e.g. * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ) . some of these systems may produce unusually rapid rotators even within the framework of the tayler - spruit dynamo , but more detailed evolutionary studies are needed to make a meaningful conclusion on this . the fact that host galaxies of broad - lined sne ic and grbs are found to be systematically overdense compared to other sdss galaxies might be an indication for the importance of the binary channel for producing rapidly rotating progenitors to produce these events @xcite . wr stars in binary systems are excellent observational counterparts for sn ib / c progenitors during the post case b / ab mass transfer phase , for @xmath81 @xcite . relatively low - mass helium stars ( @xmath82 ) in binary systems are only rarely observed . this is probably because such helium stars on the helium main sequence are very hot and faint in optical bands ( see fig . [ fig : hr2 ] ) and because many of them have bright ob - type companion stars . as mentioned above ( sect . [ sect : binarymass ] ) , the best observational counterpart of binary sn ib / c progenitors with @xmath29 is the quasi - wr ( qwr ) star hd 45166 @xcite : the primary is a helium rich 4.2 @xmath4 star with @xmath83 and the secondary is a 4.8 @xmath4 main sequence star , in a 1.596 day orbit @xcite . this system was probably produced via unstable case b / ab mass transfer and the consequent common envelope phase . this star gives important information about the mass loss rate from such a relatively low - mass helium star as discussed in sect . [ sect : binarymass ] . wr 7a is another qwr star @xcite . no companion of this star has been found so far . radial periodicity of 0.204 day has been reported , and if this is related to binarity , its companion should be a low - mass main sequence star ( @xmath84 @xmath4 ) or a compact object . to our knowledge , no estimate of the wind mass loss rate from this star has been reported yet . there also exist candidates for evolved helium giant stars beyond core helium exhaustion . they include @xmath85 sgr , ks per and lss 4300 @xcite . among these , the @xmath85 sgr system has been best studied ( e.g. , * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? the mass , surface temperature and bolometric luminosity of the hydrogen - deficient primary of this system are @xmath86 @xmath4 , @xmath87 k and @xmath88 . it also shows radial pulsation of a 20 day period @xcite , and evidence for mass transfer and a circumbinary disk @xcite , which agrees well with the case bb mass transfer scenario @xcite . therefore , these systems can provide useful information about the progenitor evolution as well as their circumstellar environments immediately before sn explosion . the visual magnitude of this star is @xmath89 @xcite , which is consistent with the model predictions discussed in sect . [ sect : binarysurface ] . the companion stars of binary progenitors of sne ib / c will survive the sn explosion and may be found in some young sn remnants ( e.g. * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ) . there may be several types of companion stars : main sequence stars of early to late types , compact objects like white dwarfs , neutron stars and black holes , and helium stars ( sect . [ sect : binaryevol ] ; fig . [ fig : binary ] ) . in terms of stellar population , the most common type ( i.e. , more than 30% of all binary sn ib / c progenitors ) may be relatively high mass stars ( o / b type ) on the main sequence that underwent stable case b / bb / ab / abb mass transfer ( e.g. , * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? these massive companion stars accrete mass and angular momentum via stable mass transfer to be spun up to the critical value @xcite . at solar metallicity , however , they will lose angular momentum again via stellar winds after the mass transfer phase , and the rotation velocity shortly after the sn explosion depends on how much mass is lost by winds until that time . models by @xcite indicate that the surface rotation velocity will be about 300 - 450 @xmath90 for surviving companion of @xmath91 @xmath4 . by contrast , more massive stars loses mass and angular momentum very quickly : a 48 @xmath4 companion star would be slowed down to about 60 @xmath90 at the pre - sn stage . the transferred mass to the secondary star is enriched with the ashes of hydrogen burning compared to the initial composition @xcite . the surface composition of the surviving secondary star after the sn explosion should be therefore marked by the enhancement of helium and nitrogen . the models of @xcite give typically the mass fractions of helium and nitrogen of about 0.35 and @xmath92 ( i.e. , 4.3 times the solar value ) at the surface of surviving companion stars , respectively . > x| > x & single & binary + initial mass & @xmath50 @xmath4 at @xmath11 & @xmath93 @xmath4 + final mass & @xmath94 at @xmath11 & @xmath95 at @xmath11 + final radius & @xmath96 & @xmath97 + wind mass loss rate & @xmath98 & @xmath99 + escape velocity ( @xmath100 ) & @xmath101 & @xmath102 + circumstellar structure & @xmath103 & complex with wind - wind collision and orbital motion + optical magnitudes & @xmath104 for wo type progenitor , and @xmath105 for wn type progenitor . & @xmath106 for most helium star progenitors . it will be more luminous in optical bands with a bright companion . + light curves & relatively faint at early times . broad light curves & fairly luminous early time plateau for @xmath107 @xmath4 + spectra & no or weak helium lines for most cases , and hence biased towards the production of sne ic . & helium lines even without non - thermal processes during the early time plateau phase for @xmath108 @xmath4 + many of wr progenitors would end their lives as a wo type star that is relatively faint with optical filters ( @xmath104 ; @xcite ) . binary systems with a sufficiently high initial mass of the primary star can produce wr progenitors of which the properties would be very similar to those of single wr stars , but the presence of the companion star would result in rather complex structures of the circumstellar medium and the sn remnant @xcite . compared to the single star case , the detectability of wr progenitors can be significantly enhanced with a luminous early type companion . however , given the preference for lower masses of the initial mass function , the majority of binary progenitors should have several unique properties that are very different from wr progenitors . their final masses at the pre - sn stage are systematically lower ( @xmath109 for @xmath110 ) than those of wr progenitors ( @xmath7 @xmath4 ) . this agrees well with the recent ejecta mass estimates of ordinary sne ib / c ( @xmath111 @xmath4 ; @xcite ) . the current binary model predictions are also consistent with the observational facts that the association of the sn locations in their host galaxies with young stellar populations becomes stronger following the order of sn ii , sn ib and sn ic ( sects . [ sect : binarymass ] and [ sect : fate ] ) , which is usually interpreted within the single star scenario in the literature ( e.g. , * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ) . despite their relatively low masses , the detectability of binary progenitors in optical bands is not necessarily lower than single wr star progenitors . to the contrary , a significant fraction of binary progenitors should have very high visual luminosities because relatively low - mass helium stars can rapidly expand during the late evolutionary stages , and/or because many of them would have luminous companion stars @xcite . the sn models by @xcite indicate that early time light curves and spectra would have the critical information about the nature of sn ib / c progenitors . in particular , the plateau phase due to helium recombination at early times and he i lines formed with thermal processes during this phase would be strong evidence for a relatively low - mass helium star progenitor having an extended helium envelope . as demonstrated by several recent observations(e.g . ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ) , the progenitor size can also be best constrained by early - time sn light curves including shock breakouts . we therefore conclude that observations of early - time light curves and spectra will be an excellent probe into the nature of sn ib / c progenitors . * a caveat in the above conclusions is that the predictions summarized in table [ tab1 ] are mostly based on the models at solar metallicity . the final masses of single star progenitors at super - solar metallicity can become as low as 5 @xmath4 , depending on the adopted mass loss rate ( fig . [ fig : finalmass ] ; * ? ? ? * ) . this value is within the ejecta mass range of ordinary sne ib / c by @xcite and @xcite , although it still can not explain sne ib / c having ejecta masses lower than about 3.5 @xmath4 . given that the final amounts of helium must also be smaller than in the case of solar metallicity ( fig . [ fig : hemass ] ) , the contribution from super - solar metallicity single stars might be particularly significant for sne ic ( cf . * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? although the sn ib / c event rate implies the dominant role of binary systems for the production of sne ib / c @xcite , more direct evidence for binary progenitors comes from sne ib / c ejecta masses ( @xmath112 ; sects . [ sect : binarymass ] and [ sect : fate ] ) . precise estimates of sn ejecta masses can give one of the best constraints for progenitor models . the uncertainties related to the effects of asymmetry of the explosion , mixing of chemical compositions in the sn ejecta and the presence of helium on the estimates of @xmath112 using sn light curves should be clarified in the near future ( cf . * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * the question on how much helium can be hidden in sn ic spectra is another critical test case for sn ib / c progenitor models ( sects . [ sect : singlehe ] , [ sect : binaryhe ] and [ sect : fate ] ; fig . [ fig : fate ] ) . recent observations indicate very low helium mass ( @xmath113 ) in the ejecta @xcite . this can not be easily accommodated to the current model predictions that most sn ib / c progenitors have @xmath114 . this conflict may be due to our lack of proper knowledge on the mass loss rate from helium stars ( in particular during the post - helium burning phase ; sect . [ sect : binaryhe ] ) but a rigorous estimate of helium masses for a large sample of sne ib / c is highly required to resolve this issue . the ratio of sn ic to sn ib is another important constraint for progenitor models , which should be better estimated in the future . several authors reported that the ic to ib ratio is about 2 ( e.g. , * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ) , but @xcite point out that many sne ib had been misclassified as sne ic , suggesting a lower value . * as discussed in sect . [ sect : fate ] , future observations on sn ib / c and sn iib properties and their relative frequencies as a function of metallicity ( e.g. , * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ) would greatly help to clarify the role of mass loss from helium stars in the evolution of sn ib / c progenitors . it would be particularly important to investigate how the ejecta masses of sne ib / c and the ratio of sn ib / sn ic rate systematically depend on metallicity . * in the discussions above , we did not address progenitors of broad - lined sne ic ( sne ic - bl ) , simply because we do not have a good clue on what makes them . the association of long grbs and some sne ic - bl ( e.g. * ? ? ? * ) implies the importance of rapid rotation , and attempts have been made to explain long grbs , sne ic - bl and super - luminous sne ic within the single framework of the magnetar scenario ( e.g. , * ? ? ? binary star models including rotation do not predict any particular parameter space where unusually rapid rotation in the core can be realized from the standard case b / bb / ab / abb channels for sne ib / c @xcite , except for the so - called chemically homogeneous evolution induced by mass accretion at low metallicity @xcite . future studies should investigate more carefully the evolution of some specific binary systems where the condition of rapid rotation for magnetars can be rather easily fulfilled compared to the standard channels , such as binary systems consisting of a helium star plus a compact object in a very tight orbit ( fig . [ fig : binary ] ; sect . [ sect : binaryrot ] ) . the author is grateful to norbert langer , stan woosley , luc dessart , hyun - jeong kim , bon - chul koo , gtz grfener , jorick vink , wonseok chun , thomas tauris , rob izzard , alexandra kozyreva , and john hillier for their contribution to this work and fruitful collaboration , and john eldridge , maryam modjaz , philipp podsiadlowski , kenichi nomoto , keiichi maeda , selma de mink and cyril georgy for helpful discussions . this work was supported by basic science research ( 2013r1a1a2061842 ) program through the national research foundation of korea ( nrf ) and by research resettlement fund for the new faculty of snu . anderson , j.p . , habergham , s.m . , james , p.a . , & hamuy , m. 2012 , mnras , 424 , 1372 arcavi , i. et al . 2010 , apj , 721 , 777 barkat , z. , rakavy , g. , & sack , n. 1967 , phrvl , 18 , 379 bersten , m. , benvenuto , o.m . , & folatelli , g. et al . 2014 , apj , 148 , 68 boissier , s. , & prantozs , n. 2009 , a&a , 503 , 137 branch , d. , et al . 2002 , apj , 566 , 1005 braun , h. 1997 , phd thesis , ludwig - maximilians university of munich burrows , a. , dessart , l. , livne , e. , ott , c.d . , & murphy , j. 2007 , apj , 664 , 416 cao , y. , kasliwal , m. m. , & arcavi , i. et al . 2013 , apj , 775 , l7 cano , z. 2013 , mnras , 434 , 1098 cano , z. , maeda , k. , & schulze , s. 2014 , mnras , 785 , 95 cantiello , m. , yoon , s .- c . , langer , n. , & livio , m. 2007 , a&a , 465 , 29 cantiello , m. , mankovich , c. , bildsten , l. , christensen - dalsgaard , j. , & paxton , b. 2014 , apj , 788 , 93 chevalier , r.a . , & soderberg , a. , 2010 , apj , 711 , l40 chiosi , c. & maeder , a. 1986 , ara&a , 24 , 328 chomiuk , l. et al . 2011 , apj , 743 , 114 chornock , r. et al . 2011 , apj , 739 , 41 claeys , j.s.w . , de mink , s > e . , pols , o.r . , eldridge , j.j . , & baes , m. 2011 , a&a , 528 , a131 conti , p.s . 1976 , in proc . 20th colloq . lige , p. 193 , univ . lige corsi , a. , ofek , e.o . , & gal - yam , a. , et al . 2012 , apj , 747 , 5 crockett , r.m . , smartt , s.j . , & eldridge , j.j . 2007 , mnras , 381 , 835 crowther , p.a . 2007 , ara&a , 45 , 177 de jager , c. , nieuwenhuijzen , h. , & van der hucht , k.a . 1988 , a&as , 72 , 259 de mink , s.e . , pols , o.r . , langer , n. , izzard , r.g . 2009 , a&a , 507 , 169 de mink , s.e . , langer , n. , izzard , r.g . , sana , h. , & de koter , a. 2013 , apj , 764 , 166 de mink , s.e . , sana , h. , langer , n. , izzard , r.g . , & schneider , f.r.n . 2014 , apj , 782 , 7 deng , j.s . , qiu , y.l . , hu , j.y . , hatano , k. , & branch , d. 2000 , apj , 540 , 452 dessart , l. , hillier , d.j . , livne , e. , yoon , s .- c . , woosley , s.e . , waldman , r. , & langer , n. 2011 , mnras , 414 , 2985 dessart , l. , hillier , d. , li , c. , & woosley , s.e . 2012a , mnras , 424 , 2139 dessart , l. , hillier , d. , waldman , r. , livne , e. , & blondin , s. 2012b , mnras , 426 , l76 detmers , r.g . , langer , n. , podsiadlowski , ph . , & izzard , r.g . 2008 , a&a , 484 , 831 dewi , j.d.m . , pols , o.r . , savonije , g.j . , & van den heuvel , e.p.j . 2002 , mnras , 331 , 1027 drout , m.r . 2011 , apj , 741 , 97 dudley , r.e . , & jeffery , c.s . , 1993 , mnras , 262 , 945 eggenberger , p. , maeder , a. , & meynet , g. 2005 , a&a , 440 , l9 eggenberger , p. , montalbn , j. , & miglio , a. 2012 , a&a , 544 , l4 ekstrm , s. , georgy , c. , eggenberger , p. et al . 2012 , a&a , 537 , a146 eldridge , j.j . , fraser , m. , mound , j.r . , & smartt , s.j . 2015 , mnras , 446 , 2689 eldridge , j.j . , fraser , m. , smartt , s.j . , mound , j.r . , & crockett , r. m. 2013 , mnras , 436 , 774 eldridge , j.j . , izzard , r.g . , tout , c.a . 2008 , mnras , 384 , 1109 eldridge , j.j . , langer , n. , & tout , c.a . 2011 , mnras , 414 , 3501 eldridge , j.j . , & vink , j.s . 2006 , a&a , 452 , 295 elmhamdi , a. , danziger , i.j . , branch , d. , leibundgut , b. , baron , e. , & kirchner , r.p . 2006 , a&a , 450 , 305 filippenko , a.v . 1997 , ara&a , 35 , 309 foley , r.j . , smith , n. , ganeshalingam , m. , li , w. , chornock , r. , & filippenko , a.v . 2007 , apj , 657 , 105 frame , d.j . , cottrell , p.l . , gilmore , a.c . , kilmartin , p.m. , & lawson , w.a . 1995 , mnras , 276 , 383 fremling , c. , sollerman , j. , & taddia , f. , et al . 2014 , a&a , 565 , 114 fryer , c.l . , & heger , a. 2005 , apj , 623 , 302 fujimoto , m.y . 1993 , apj , 419 , 768 gal - yam , a. 2009 , nature , 462 , 624 gal - yam , a. , arcavi , i. , & ofek , e.o . , et al . 2014 , nature , 509 , 471 gellert , m. , rdiger , g. , & elstner , d. 2008 , a&a , 479 , l33 georgy , c. , ekstrm , s. , & meynet , g. et al . 2012 , a&a , 542 , a29 gorbikov . 2014 , mnras , 443 , 671 grfener , g. , & hamann , w .- r . 2008 , a&a , 482 , 945 grfener , g. , owocki , s.p . , & vink , j.s . 2012 , a&a , 538 , a40 grfener , g. , & vink , j.s . 2013 , a&a , 560 , a6 graham , j.f . , & fruchter , a.s . 2013 , apj , 774 , 119 groh , j.h . , oliveira , a.s . , & steiner , j.e . 2008 , a&a , 485 , 245 groh , j . h. , meynet , g. , georgy , c. , & ekstroem , s. 2013a , a&a , 558 , a131 groh , j . h. , georgy , c. , & ekstroem , s. 2013b , a&a , 558 , l1 hakobyan , a.a . , mamon , g.a . , petrosian , a.r . , kunth , d. , & turatto , m. 2009 , a&a , 508 , 1259 hamann , w .- r . , schoenberner , d. , & heber , u. 1982 , a&a , 116 , 273 hamann , w .- r . , koesterke , l. , wessolowski , u. 1995 , a&a , 299 , 151 hamann , w .- r . , grfener , g. , & liermann , a. 2006 , a&a , 457 , 1015 hachinger , s. , mazzaili , p.a . , taubenberger , s. , hillebrandt , w. , nomoto , k. , & sauer , d.n . 2012 , mnras , 422 , 70 heger , a. , langer , n. , & woosley , s.e . 2000 , apj , 528 , 368 heger , a. , fryer , c.l . , woosley , s.e . , langer , n. , & hartmann , d.h . 2004 , apj , 591 , 288 heger , a. , woosley , s.e . , & spruit , h.c . 2005 , apj , 626 , 350 hirschi , r. , meynet , g. , & maeder , a. 2004 , a&a , 425 , 649 hjorth , j. 2013 , rspta , 371 , 20120275 ibeling , d. , & heger , a. 2013 , apj , 765 , 43 inserra , c. et al . 2013 , apj , 770 , 128 ishii , m. , ueno , m. , & kato , m. 1999 , pasj , 51 , 417 izzard , r.g . , ramirez - ruiz , e. , & tout , c.a . 2004 , mnras , 348 , 1215 ivanova , n. , belczynski , k. , kalogera , v. , rasio , f.a . , & taam , r.e . 2003 , apj , 592 , 475 jeffery , c.s . , & hamann , w .- r . 2010 , mnras , 404 , 1698 justham , s. , podsiadlowski , ph . , vink , j.s . 2014 , apj , 796 , 121 kasen , d. , & bildsten , l. 2010 , apj , 717 , 245 kelly , p.l . , & kirshnir , r.p . 2012 , apj , 759 , 107 kelly , p.l . , filippenko , a.v . , modjaz , m. , & kocevski , d. 2014 , apj , 789 , 23 kim , h .- j . , yoon , s .- c . , & koo , b .- 2015 , apj , submitted kippenhahn , r. , & weigert , a. 1967 , z. astrophys . 65 , 251 kipper , t. , & klochkova , v.g . , 2012 , baltic astronomy , 21 , 219 kobulnicky , h.a . , & fryer , c.l . 2007 , apj , 670 , 747 kochanek , c. 2009 , apj , 707 , 1578 koo , b.c . , mckee , c.f . , & suh , k.w . 2011 , apj , 732 , 6 koubsky , p. , harmanec , p. , yang , s. , netolick , m. , et al . 2006 , a&a , 459 , 849 kozyreva , a. , blinnikov , s. , langer , n. & yoon , s .- c . 2014 , a&a , 565 , 70 langer , n. 1989a , a&a , 210 , 93 langer , n. 1989b , a&a , 220 , 135 langer , n. 1992 , a&a , 265 , 17 langer , n. 2012 , ara&a , 50 , 107 lauterborn , d. 1970 , a&a , 7 , 150 li , w. , leaman , j. , & chornock , r. et al . 2011 , mnras , 412 , 1441 lucy , l.b . 1991 , apj , 383 , 308 lunnan , r. et al . 2014 , apj , 787 , 138 lyman , j. , bersier , d. , james , p. et al . 2014 , arxive:1406.3667 macfadyen , a. , & woosley , s. 1999 , apj , 524 , 262 maeda , k. , katsuda , s. , bamba , a. , terada , y. , & fukazawa , y. 2014 , apj , 785 , 95 maeder , a. 1987 , a&a , 178 , 159 maeder , a. , & meynet , g. 1987 , a&a , 182 , 243 maeder , a. , & meynet , g. 2000 , ara&a , 38 , 143 maeder , a. , georgy , c. , meynet , g. , & ekstrm , s. 2012 , a&a , 539 , a110 massey , ph . 2003 , ara&a , 41 , 15 maund , j.r . , & smartt , s.j . 2005 , mnras , 360 , 288 maund , j.r . , smartt , s.j . , kudritzki , r.p . , podsiadlowski , ph . , & gilmore , g.f . , 2004 , nature , 427 , 129 maund , j.r . , smartt , s.j . , & schweizer , f. 2005 , apj , 630 , 33 mazzali , p.a . , rpke , f.k . , benetti , s. , & hillebrandt , w. 2007 , science , 315 , 825 mazzali , p.a . , mcfadyen , a.i . , woosley , s.e . , pian , e. , & tanaka , m. 2014 , mnras , 443 , 67 meynet , g. , & maeder , a. 1997 , a&a , 321 , 465 meynet , g. , & maeder , a. 2003 , a&a , 404 , 975 meynet , g. , & maeder , a. 2005 , a&a , 429 , 581 meynet , g. , maeder , a. , schaller , g. , schaerer , d. , & charbonnel , c. 1994 , a&as , 103 , 97 modjaz , m. , blondin , s. , & kirshner , r.p . 2014 , apj , 147 , 99 modjaz , m , kewley , l. , bloom , j.s . , filippenko , a.v . , perley , d. , & silverman , j.m . 2011 , apj , 731 , 4 modjaz , m , kewley , l. , & kirshner et al . 2008 , aj , 135 , 1136 modjaz , m , li , w. , & butler , n. et al . 2009 , apj , 702 , 226 netolick , m. , bonneau , d. , cehsneau , o. et al . 2009 , a&a , 499 , 827 nicholl , m. et al . 2013 , nature , 502 , 346 nomoto , k. , yamaoka , h. , pols , o.r . , van den heuvel , e.p.j . , iwamoto , k. , kumagai , s. , & shigeyama , t. 1994 , nature , 371 , 227 nugis , t. , & lamers , h.j.g.l.m . 2000 , a&a , 360 , 227 oliveira , a.s . , steiner , j.e . , & cieslinski , d. , 2003 , mnras , 346 , 963 pereira , c.b . 1998 , a&a , 338 , l91 petrovic , j. , langer , van der hucht , k.a . 2005a , 435 , 1013 petrovic , j. , langer , yoon , s .- c . , hger , a. 2005b , 435 , 247 petrovic , j. , pols , o. , & langer , n. 2006 , a&a , 450 , 219 piro , a. , & morozova , v.s . 2014 , apj , 792 , l11 podsiadlowski , ph . , joss , p.c . , & hsu , j.j.l . 1992 , apj , 391 , 246 podsiadlowski , ph . , hsu , j.j.l . , joss , p.c . , & ross , r.r . 1993 , nature , 364 , 509 podsiadlowski , ph . , ivanova , n. , justham , s. , rappaport , s. 2010 , mnras , 406 , 840 pols , o.r . 1994 , a&a . 290 , 119 pols , o.r . , & dewi , j.d.m . 2002 , pasa , 19 , 233 prieto , j.l . , stanek , k.z . , & beacom , j.f . 2008 , apj , 673 , 999 saio , h. 1995 , mnras , 277 , 1393 salasnich , b. , bressan , a. , & chiosi , c. 1999 , a&a , 342 , 131 sana , h. et al . 2012 , science , 337 , 444 sander , a. , hamann , w .- r . , & todt , h. 2012 , a&a , 540 , a144 sanders , n.e . , soderberg , a.m. , & levesque , e.m . 2012 , apj , 758 , 132 scalzo , r.a . , ruiter , a.j . , & sim , s.a . 2014 , mnras , 445 , 2535 schaeffer , r. , casse , m. , & cahen , s. 1987 , apjl , 316 , 31 schaerer , d. , charbonnel , c. , meynet , g. , maeder , a. , & schaller , g. 1993a , a&as,102 , 339 schaerer , d. , meynet , g. , maeder , a. , & schaller , g. 1993b , a&as , 98 , 523 schaller , g. , schaerer , d. , meynet , g. , & maeder , a. 1992 , a&as , 96 , 269 schoenberner , d. , & drilling , j.s . 1983 , apj , 268 , 225 schwartz , r.d . , persson , s.e . , & hamann , f.w . , 1990 , aj , 100 , 793 smartt , s.j . 2009 , ara&a , 47 , 63 smith , n. , li , w. , filippenko , a.v . , & chornock , r. 2011 , mnras , 412 , 1522 smith , n. 2014 , ara&a , 53 , 487 soderberg , a.m. , et al . 2008 , nature , 453 , 469 spencer , j. , baron , e. 2010 , apj , 718 , 957 spruit , h.c . 2002 , a&a , 381 , 923 steiner , j.e . , & oliveira , a.s . 2005 , a&a , 444 , 895 stritzinger , m. , leibundgut , b. , walch , s. , & contardo , g. 2006 , a&a , 450 , 241 suijs , m.p.l . , langer , n. , poelarends , a.j . 2008 , a&a , 481 , 87 taddia , f. , sollerman , j. , & leloudas , g. et al . 2014 , arxiv:1408.4084 tauris , t.m . , langer , n. , moriya , t.j . , podsiadlowski , ph . , yoon , s .- c . , blinnikov , s.i . 2013 , apjl , 778 , l23 townsend , r. , & macdonald , j. 2008 , in massive stars as cosmic engines , iau symp . 250 , p. 161 vanbeveren , d. , de loore , c. , & van rensbergern , w. 1998 , a&ar , 9 , 63 vanbeveren , d. , van bever , j. , & belkus , h. 2007 , apj , 662 , 107 van blerkom , d. , 1978 , apj , 225 , 175 van den berg , s. , li , w. , filippenko , a.v . 2005 , pasp , 117 , 773 van den heuvel , e.p.j . , & yoon , s .- c . 2007 , ap&ss , 311 , 177 van der hucht , k.a . 2001 , new . 45 , 135 van dyk , s.d . , zheng , w. , & fox , o.d . , 2014 , apj , 147 , 37 van loon , j.th . , cioni , m .- r.l . , zijlstra , a.a . & loup , c. 2005 , a&a , 438 , 273 van loon , j.th . 2008 , a&a , 487 , 1055 vink , j.s . , & de koter , a. 2005 , a&a , 442 , 587 wellons , s. , soderberg , a.m. , & chevalier , r.a . 2012 , apj , 752 , 17 wellstein , s. , & langer , n. 1999 , a&a , 350 , 148 wellstein , s. 2001 , phd thesis , university of potsdam wellstein , s. , langer , n. , & braun , h. 2001 , a&a , 369 , 939 wheeler , j.c . , yi , i. , hflich , p. , & wang , l. 2000 , apj , 537 , 810 wheeler , j.c . , johnson , v. , & clocchiatti , a. 2014 , arxiv:1411.5975 willis , a.j . , & stickland , d.j . , 1983 , mnras , 203 , 619 woosley , s.e . 1993 , apj , 405 , 273 woosley , s.e . 2010 , apj , 719 , 204 woosley , s.e . , & bloom , j. s. 2006 , ara&a , 44 , 507 woosley , s.e . , & eastman , r.g . 1997 , in thermonuclear supernovae , nato asi proc . sereis c. , vol . 486 , p. 821 , ruiz - lapuente , p. , canal , r. , isern , j. , eds . , kluwer , dortrecht woosley , s.e . , langer , n. , & weaver , t.a . 1993 , apj , 411 , 823 woosley , s.e . , langer , n. , & weaver , t.a . 1995 , apj , 448 , 315 woosley , s.e . , & heger , a. 2006 , apj , 637 , 914 yoon , s .- c . , & langer , n. 2005 , a&a , 443 , 643 yoon , s .- c . , langer , n. , norman , c. 2006 , a&a , 460 , 199 yoon , s .- c . , & cantiello , m. 2010 , apjl , 717 , l62 yoon , s .- c . , woosley , s.e . , & langer , n. 2010 , apj , 725 , 940 yoon , s .- c . , dierks , a. , & langer , n. 2012a , a&a , 542 , a113 yoon , s .- c . , grfener , g. , vink , j.s . , kozyreva , a. , & izzard , r.g . 2012b , a&a , 544 , l11 zahn , j .- p . , brun , a.s . , & mathis , s. 2007 , a&a , 474 , 145 Abstract:

Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.

Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered . Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video . Paper: the study of collisional relaxation in stellar nuclei around massive black holes and the associated rates of capture has a long history . the pioneering work of @xcite established a quasi - steady - state solution for the stellar distribution , now known as a bahcall - wolf cusp , which has a density @xmath6 inside the radius of influence @xmath7 , defined roughly as the radius enclosing a mass in stars equal to the mass @xmath8 of the hole . their solution was obtained from the steady - state , one - dimensional fokker - planck equation describing two - body relaxation and energy exchange between stars in the ( newtonian ) gravitational field of the massive object , and is characterized by zero ( or very small ) flux of stars with respect to energy into the central hole . a more refined treatment requires the concept of a `` loss cone '' , the region of phase space corresponding to stars with sufficienly low angular momenta to be captured by the black hole : @xmath9 , where the capture boundary @xmath10 is determined either by tidal disruption or by direct capture , at some radius @xmath11 @xcite . the latter paper also introduced the important distinction between empty- and full - loss - cone regimes , with the boundary between them defined as the energy at which the typical change of angular momentum in one radial period , @xmath12 , is equal to @xmath13 . @xcite derived the quasi - steady - state rate of consumption of stars as a function of energy and showed that the distribution function depends logarithmically on angular momentum near the loss cone . these authors , and subsequently @xcite , included capture from the loss cone via an energy - dependent sink term in the one - dimensional fokker - planck equation for @xmath14 . while the addition of such a term greatly increases the capture rate , it was found to have little effect on the form of the density profile at radii @xmath15 . @xcite solved two - dimensional fokker - planck equation in @xmath16 space and confirmed the results of the more approximate one - dimensional studies . these early studies were targeted toward massive black holes in globular clusters . the theory was subsequently applied to determine capture rates in galactic nuclei @xcite . studies based on the fokker - planck equation were also verified by other methods such as monte - carlo models @xcite , gaseous models @xcite and direct @xmath5-body simulation @xcite . relaxation times in galactic nuclei are much longer than in globular clusters , and in many cases much longer than galaxy lifetimes . partly as a consequence , galactic nuclei need not be spherically symmetric , and they may contain a substantial population of `` centrophilic '' orbits ( saucers , pyramids ) that dominate the capture rate , even in the absence of gravitational encounters @xcite . in the context of collisional loss - cone repopulation , by far the majority of studies have assumed spherical symmetry . this assumption is not crucial for @xmath5-body integrations ( except insofar as it can be difficult to construct nonspherical initial conditions ) , but it is an important ingredient of fokker - planck studies , because it ensures the conservation of angular momentum in the unperturbed motion . to date , all fokker - planck treatments that allowed for non - sphericity @xcite have assumed axisymmetry and have further restricted the allowed form of @xmath17 by writing @xmath18 , with @xmath2 the component of angular momentum parallel to the symmetry axis . two integrals of motion are not sufficient to specify regular motion in the axisymmetric geometry however , and numerical integrations in axisymmetric potentials typically reveal a third integral , @xmath19 ( with some orbits chaotic ) . of course , the reason for the neglect of @xmath19 is the absence of knowledge about its functional form . for mildly flattened systems , @xmath19 can be approximated by @xmath20 @xcite , and this approximation has been used as a basis for constructing steady - state models ( e.g. * ? ? ? the neglect of the third integral in the axisymmetric problem has several important consequences . instead of individual orbits populated by stars having the same values of their integrals of motion , one effectively considers ensembles of orbits composed of stars with different @xmath19 . moreover , by setting @xmath18 , the phase space density is forced to be uniform within this ensemble , which may lead to unphysical constraints on the possible evolution of the system . the diffusion coefficients must also be evaluated as if they did not depend on @xmath19 , or , more correctly , are averaged over all possible values of @xmath19 . finally , ignoring the third integral precludes the detailed study of regular orbits such as saucers , which might be expected to dominate the loss rate @xcite . however , sufficiently close to the black hole , the unperturbed motion is nearly keplerian , and standard `` planetary '' perturbation theory implies the existence of a third integral , which can sometimes even be expressed in terms of simple functions @xcite . in this approximation , the unperturbed stellar orbits are regular ( integrable ) and respect three independent integrals of the motion : @xmath0 , @xmath2 and @xmath3 , where @xmath3 is the `` secular , '' i.e. averaged , hamiltonian . given an analytic expression for the third integral in the vicinity of the black hole , fully three - dimensional fokker - planck studies become feasible , describing the time evolution of @xmath21 . for the present study , however , we choose to concentrate on evolution in the two - dimensional subspace @xmath22 with the gravitational potential , and the orbital energy @xmath0 , fixed . our justification for ignoring changes in @xmath0 is the same as in many previous studies of the loss - cone problem in galactic nuclei @xcite : energy relaxation time scales are typically very long in nuclei , too long for steady - state configurations like the bahcall - wolf cusp to be reached . instead , the dependence of @xmath17 on @xmath0 is inferred from the observed , radial density profile via eddington s formula . our goal is to generalize the well - known , one - dimensional solutions for @xmath23 in the spherical geometry to the two - dimensional case @xmath24 in the axisymmetric geometry . the paper is organized as follows . in [ sec_orbital_structure ] we use the averaging method to demonstrate the existence of a third integral of motion inside the supermassive black hole ( sbh ) sphere of influence and we use it to elucidate the behavior of orbits : the tube orbits that are generic to the axisymmetric geometry , and the saucer orbits that inhabit the low - angular - momentum parts of phase space . the fokker - planck equation is written down in [ sec_fp_definition ] , and a scheme for calculating diffusion coefficients is presented in the case of three integrals of motion . following this general treatment , we then restrict our attention to weakly flattened systems , which allows some simplification in the computations . we also concentrate on the case @xmath25 , which is both physically reasonable , and which results in analytic expressions for many of the diffusion coefficients . [ sec_boundary_cond ] discusses the proper boundary conditions for the fokker - planck equation , and [ sec_fp_solution ] is devoted to the solution of the two - dimensional equation and comparison with the one - dimensional ( spherical ) case . it turns out that the flux of stars into the sbh is enhanced with respect to the spherical case , but by a modest factor : at most a factor of a few . in [ sec_nbody ] we describe direct @xmath5-body simulations designed to test the predictions of the fokker - planck models ; sections [ sec_chaos ] and [ sec_triaxiality ] briefly discuss the role of chaotic orbits beyond the sbh influence sphere , and triaxiality of the stellar potential , respectively . finally , in [ sec_estimates ] we estimate capture rates in realistic galaxy models , using the fokker - planck models to access the range of parameters not presently accessible to @xmath5-body simulations . consider a stellar nucleus in which the density varies as a power of radius , @xmath26 , and in which the equidensity contours are flattened in the direction of the short ( @xmath1 ) axis ; in other words , an oblate system . let @xmath27 be the axis ratio , i.e. the ratio of radii along the minor and major axes at which densities are equal . in the first approximation , the stellar density and potential of a flattened system are described by the spherical part modified by an @xmath28 legendre polynomial : [ eq_modelrhophi ] @xmath29 \right ) , \label{eq_rho_cusp } \\ \phi_\star(\boldsymbol{x } ) & = & \phi_0 \left(\frac{r}{r_0}\right)^{2-\gamma}\ , \left(1 + { \epsilon_p}\left[\frac{z^2}{r^2}-\frac{1}{3}\right ] \right ) , \label{eq_phi_cusp } \\ \phi_0 & = & \frac{4\pi\,g\rho_0\,r_0 ^ 2}{(3-\gamma)(2-\gamma ) } \ ; , \label{eq_phi0 } \\ { \epsilon_p}&= & { \epsilon_d}\,\frac{(3-\gamma)(2-\gamma)}{\gamma\,(\gamma-5 ) } \ ; , \label{eq_epsilonp}\\ { \epsilon_d}&= & -\frac{3 ( p^{-\gamma}-1)}{2p^{-\gamma}+1 } \label{eq_epsilond}\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath30 . the total gravitational potential is @xmath31 where @xmath32 is the mass of the supermassive black hole ( sbh ) located at @xmath33 . throughout this section , we restrict attention to motion that satisfies @xmath34^{1/(3-\gamma ) } , \ ] ] where @xmath35 is the gravitational radius of the sbhand @xmath7 its radius of influence ; the latter is conventionally defined as the radius of a sphere containing a mass in stars equal to @xmath36 . the first inequality permits us to ignore relativistic corrections to the equations of motion , and the second allows us to treat the force from the stars as a small perturbation to the inverse - square force from the sbh . the effects of relativity are discussed briefly in appendix [ sec_appendix_relativity ] , where more precise conditions for the validity of the newtonian approximation are derived . under these conditions , one expects the motion to be nearly keplerian on time scales comparable with the radial period , and we can employ the method of averaging @xcite : the forces acting on a star are averaged over the unperturbed motion , with the orbital elements the `` osculating elements '' fixed during the averaging . it is convenient to describe the motion using the delaunay variables which are action - angle variables in the unperturbed problem : @xmath37 ( actions ) and @xmath38 ( angles ) . here @xmath39 is the angular momentum of a circular orbit with given semimajor axis @xmath40 or total energy @xmath0 , @xmath41 is the magnitude and @xmath2 is the @xmath42component of the angular momentum ( so that @xmath43 gives the inclination of orbital plane with respect to the @xmath44 plane ) ; @xmath45 is the radial phase ( mean anomaly ) , @xmath46 is the argument of periastron ( @xmath47 corresponds to periapsis in @xmath44 plane ) , and @xmath48 is the longitude of ascending node . we further define dimensionless angular momentum variables as @xmath49 $ ] and @xmath50 $ ] . we will also have occasion to refer to their squared values , denoted , following @xcite , as @xmath51 and @xmath52 . these three pairs of canonically - conjugate variables evolve according to hamilton s equations of motion , with the hamiltonian given by @xmath53 and with @xmath54 expressed in terms of the delaunay variables . we assume that these variables with the exception of the radial phase @xmath45 are nearly constant over one radial period : @xmath55 the averaged equations of motion can then be defined as the equations of motion corresponding to the averaged hamiltonian @xmath56 where the variables @xmath57 are fixed in the averaging of @xmath54 over @xmath45 . after the averaging , @xmath58 is independent of @xmath45 and therefore @xmath59 is conserved , as is the semimajor axis @xmath40 and the energy @xmath0 . on the other hand , @xmath58 itself is a ( new ) integral of the motion . finally , @xmath2 is conserved due to axial symmetry , from which it follows that the motion is integrable . remarkably , even in the ( weakly ) triaxial case there can exist three integrals of motion , @xmath2 being replaced by another conserved quantity @xcite . exact expressions for the averaged hamiltonian are given in appendix [ sec_appendix_hamiltonian ] . a good approximation to the averaged perturbing potential is [ eq_happrox ] @xmath60 which is exact for @xmath61 ( for which @xmath62 ) and approximates the true value to within a few percent in other cases . this hamiltonian is very similar to the averaged hamiltonian of the hierarchical restricted three - body problem @xcite ; a detailed comparison is presented in appendix [ sec_appendix_kozai ] . expressed in terms of a dimensionless time @xmath63 , the equations of motion read @xmath64 the equations for @xmath65 and @xmath48 are not needed because @xmath65 is conserved and because nothing important depends on @xmath48 . the time @xmath66 is differs by a factor @xmath67 from @xmath68 defined in @xcite . ] @xmath69 where @xmath70 is approximately the mass in stars within radius @xmath71 . @xmath66 is the time associated with precession of the argument of periastron due to the spherically - distributed mass ( the `` mass - precession time '' ) . @xmath72{fig1_rminmax.eps}\ ] ] in what follows , it will be convenient to replace @xmath73 by @xmath74 , a linear combination of @xmath73 and @xmath75 : [ eq_calh ] @xmath76 to obtain the solution , we express @xmath46 from ( [ eq_calh ] ) and substitute it into the first of equations ( [ eq_motion ] ) : @xmath77 . \nonumber \\ { { \mathcal r}_\mathrm{max}}&\equiv & { \mathcal r}_1 , \label{eq_rminmax } \\ { { \mathcal r}_\mathrm{min}}&\equiv & \mathrm{max}({\mathcal r}_2,{\mathcal r}_3 ) , \nonumber \\ { { \mathcal r}_\mathrm{low}}&\equiv & \mathrm{min}({\mathcal r}_2,{\mathcal r}_3 ) . \nonumber\end{aligned}\ ] ] it is clear that @xmath78 is allowed to oscillate between @xmath79 and @xmath80 . we thus have two classes of orbit , depending on the relation between @xmath81 and @xmath82 . if @xmath83 , which occurs when @xmath84 , the orbit is an ordinary short - axis tube ( sat ) ; in the opposite case ( @xmath85 ) the orbit is a saucer , with @xmath86 . ( a similar class of orbits was described by @xcite for a @xmath87 scale - free potential ; see appendix [ sec_appendix_saucers ] for more discussion ) . the main distinction is that for saucer orbits the angle @xmath46 librates around @xmath88 , which means the apoapsis always lies above ( or below ) the @xmath44 plane ; the orbit resembles a conical saucer with inner hole ( e.g. * ? ? ? * figure 7 ) . for tubes , conversely , @xmath46 steadily decreases . saucer orbits only exist in the oblate , not prolate case ; the condition that the expression under the radical in ( [ eq_r12 ] ) is nonnegative requires that @xmath89 , hence the label `` separatrix '' . the solution to equation ( [ eq_dcalrdtau ] ) can be expressed exactly in terms of the elliptic cosine ( e.g. * ? ? ? * chapter 16 ; their parameter @xmath90 , where @xmath91 is the elliptic modulus used as the second parameter in our notation ) : @xmath92 we call the period of full oscillation in @xmath78 the `` precession time . '' it is given by the complete elliptic integral : @xmath93 for orbits not too close to the separatrix , @xmath94 . it is also useful to write down expressions relating @xmath79 and @xmath80 . for tube orbits , @xmath95 it is clear that if @xmath96 and @xmath97 , these two values are quite close to each other , justifying the practice of approximating the third integral as @xmath20 . for saucer orbits , the relation is simpler : @xmath98 in particular , the condition @xmath99 gives the fixed - point orbit , for which @xmath100 always . figure [ fig_rminmax ] shows the properties of a series of orbits with the same @xmath101 which start with @xmath100 and with different initial angular momenta @xmath102 ( left panel ) , and the time evolution of @xmath78 for several saucer orbits with different values of @xmath74 ( right panel ) . equation ( [ eq_calh ] ) can be inverted to express @xmath78 as a function of @xmath46 ( figure [ fig_poincare ] ) , which is more convenient for the averaging procedure in the next section : [ eq_r_of_omega ] @xmath103 for tubes only the upper root has physical meaning , while for saucers both roots are valid as long as @xmath104 is greater than the following threshold : @xmath105 this condition arises from nonnegativity of the expression under the radical in ( [ eq_r_of_omega_a ] ) . therefore , in a time @xmath106 , @xmath46 varies by @xmath107 for tube orbits and by an amount @xmath108 for saucers . @xmath72{fig_poincare.eps}\ ] ] finally , we outline the complete phase space in ( @xmath109 ) coordinates ( figure [ fig_phaseplane ] ) . the boundary between tubes and saucers is @xmath110 , and the other important boundaries are @xmath111 the location of circular orbits ( @xmath112 ) , and @xmath113 is the line of fixed - point saucer orbits , for which @xmath114 . a star is captured if it passes near periapsis while having @xmath115 , where @xmath116 is the absorption boundary ( @xmath11 is the distance to sbh at which a star is either tidally disrupted or captured directly , and @xmath40 is the semimajor axis ) . in the axisymmetric system , this condition corresponds to @xmath117 , although not every star satisfying this condition is immediately lost ( see [ sec_boundary_cond ] ) . the lines of constant @xmath118 , which mark the sbh capture boundary , are straight lines satisfying @xmath119 this boundary in the saucer region touches the fixed - point orbit curve ( [ eq_fpo ] ) at @xmath120 in what follows , we will often assume that @xmath121 ( or at least not too large ) , equivalent to assuming that the nuclear flattening is modest . an isotropic distribution of stars in velocity space corresponds to a distribution function which does nt depend on @xmath122 ; in these canonical action - angle variables , the phase - space volume element is constant and we can compute the proportion of phase space occupied by saucer orbits by sampling initial conditions from a uniform distribution in these variables and recording the fraction of cases for which @xmath85 . for small @xmath123 , the fraction of saucer orbits turns out to be approximately @xmath124 , i.e. proportional to the degree of flattening measured by @xmath125 ( [ eq_epsilonp ] , [ eq_calhb ] ) . @xmath72{fig2_phaseplane.eps}\ ] ] we begin by outlining the general method for deriving the covariant fokker - planck equation in arbitrary coordinates @xcite . the local ( position - dependent ) fokker - planck equation can be expressed in terms of generalized position- and velocity - space coordinates @xmath126 , @xmath127 as @xmath128}{{\partial}t } & = & - \frac{{\partial}}{{\partial}j^\alpha } ( \langle \delta j^\alpha\rangle { \mathcal g}f ) \;+ \\ & + & \frac{1}{2 } \frac{{\partial}^2}{{\partial}j^\alpha { \partial}j^\beta } ( \langle \delta j^\alpha\delta j^\beta \rangle { \mathcal g}f ) \nonumber\end{aligned}\ ] ] ( * ? ? ? * equation ( 5.121 ) ) . the position and velocity coordinates need not be related to each other in any particular way ( e.g. they need not be canonically conjugate ) : for instance , one can adopt the integrals of motion as the velocity - space coordinates . in equation ( [ eq_fplocal ] ) , coefficients in angled brackets represent average and mean square changes of the corresponding velocity variables per unit time . equation ( [ eq_fplocal ] ) is valid under the assumptions of ( i ) local encounters that change only the velocity but not the position of a star ; ( ii ) weak interactions , which allows the collision term to be expanded in powers of @xmath129 up to second order . later in this section we will use the orbit - averaged form of this equation , which additionally requires that the significant changes in @xmath130 occur on a time scale much longer than the orbital period . the quantity @xmath131 is the density of states , with @xmath40 the determinant of the velocity - space metric tensor @xmath132 , so that the squared distance between two points whose coordinates differ by @xmath133 is given by @xmath134 , and the number of stars in the phase - space volume @xmath135 is @xmath136 ( generalization to an arbitrary , non - trivial metric in coordinate space is straightforward ) . under a change of coordinates @xmath137 , the coefficients in equation ( [ eq_fplocal ] ) transform as [ eq_transform_angled_coefs ] @xmath138 ( * ? ? ? * equation ( 5.120 ) ) and @xmath139 to compute the diffusion coefficients @xmath140 , @xmath141 , one needs to know the distribution function describing the field stars . here we assume that the test and field stars are drawn from the same @xmath17 , but as is often done , we replace the exact @xmath17 by an approximation when computing the diffusion coefficients . namely , we neglect changes in the diffusion coefficients caused by the evolution , and compute them assuming a field star distribution of the form @xmath142 , where @xmath143 is the binding energy per unit mass . in other words , we neglect the anisotropy of the field star distribution . consistency with the ( spherically - symmetric part of the ) mass model ( [ eq_rho_cusp ] ) requires that @xmath144 the assumption of isotropy in the field - star distribution is obviously inconsistent with the density model being flattened ; however , for a small degree of flattening it is a reasonable approximation . the flattening may be due to streaming motions , to an elongated velocity ellipsoid or to both ; deviations from isotropy due to nuclear flattening are of order @xmath96 . for an isotropic field - star population , the diffusion coefficients expressed in terms of @xmath145 are well known ( e.g. * ? ? ? * equations 5.23 , 5.55 ) and may be transformed to any other coordinates using ( [ eq_transform_angled_coefs ] ) . we first adopt the velocity - space variables @xmath146 , then later replace @xmath78 by @xmath74 which is a true integral of the motion . the expressions for the local diffusion coefficients in these coordinates are given in appendix [ sec_appendix_difcoefs ] , equations ( [ eq_dif_coefs_local ] ) . the orbit - averaged fokker - planck equation is obtained by ( i ) selecting integrals of motion as the velocity - space coordinates ; ( ii ) integrating the local fokker - planck equation over the phase - space volume filled by an orbit , assuming that @xmath147 is a constant in this region ( jeans s theorem ) ; ( iii ) using the leibnitz - reynolds transport theorem to exchange the order of integration and differentiation . the result is @xmath148}{{\partial}t } & = & - \frac{{\partial}}{{\partial}j^\alpha } ( \langle \delta j^\alpha\rangle_\mathrm{av } { \mathcal g_\mathrm{av}}f ) \;+ \\ & + & \frac{1}{2 } \frac{{\partial}^2}{{\partial}j^\alpha { \partial}j^\beta } ( \langle \delta j^\alpha\delta j^\beta \rangle_\mathrm{av } { \mathcal g_\mathrm{av}}f ) \nonumber\end{aligned}\ ] ] ( * ? ? ? * equation ( 5.153 ) ) , which has the same form as the local equation ( [ eq_fplocal ] ) , but now @xmath17 is understood to be a function of the @xmath130 and of @xmath149 only , and the diffusion coefficients are averaged according to @xmath150 setting @xmath151 in this expression gives the `` density of states '' @xmath152 , which relates @xmath17 to the number of stars in a velocity space volume element @xmath153 : @xmath154 . in the spherically - symmetric case , orbit averaging reduces to a one - dimensional integration with respect to radius , @xmath155 , where @xmath156 and @xmath157 are peri- and apoapsis radii for a given @xmath0 and @xmath41 ; in other words , averaging reduces to weighting @xmath158 in proportion to the time an orbit spends near @xmath71 . in the axisymmetric case , what is traditionally done @xcite is to assume that the orbit fills the configuration - space region defined by the condition @xmath159 where ( @xmath160 ) are cylindrical coordinates ; in other words , existence of a third integral is ignored . then the average turns out to be proportional simply to @xmath161 , the integral being taken over this region . in our case , the distinction between saucer and tube orbits is critical for the loss - cone problem and we do not want to mix orbits having different values of the third integral . we must perform the averaging taking into account the shapes of the orbits as described in the previous section . this is most easily done by adopting delaunay angular variables ( @xmath38 ) as configuration - space coordinates @xmath162 . if the corresponding actions ( @xmath37 ) were taken as velocity - space coordinates @xmath130 , the jacobian @xmath163 of this coordinate system would be unity ; but since we are using a different set of @xmath130 , @xmath163 is determined by equation ( [ eq_transform_jacobian ] ) for the coordinates of choice . we split this transformation , and the averaging procedure , into two steps . initially we adopt ( @xmath164 ) as generalized velocities @xmath130 and carry out the averaging over the radial phase angle ( mean anomaly ) @xmath45 , obtaining the coefficients for the spherical problem . since these do not depend on @xmath46 or @xmath48 , averaging over these two angles means simply multiplying by @xmath165 : @xmath166 here all coefficients , including the jacobian ( explicitly written as a determinant ) , are understood to be functions of ( @xmath164 ) . in the case of a keplerian potential @xmath167 ( i.e. neglecting the contribution of the stars ) , and assuming a power - law density profile for the stars with index @xmath168 , the field star distribution function ( in our isotropic approximation ) is a constant @xmath169 ( equation [ eq_distr_function ] ) , and the diffusion coefficients can be expressed in terms of elementary functions as [ eq_difcoefsrrz ] @xmath170\big\}\qquad \phantom{. } \\ \langle(\delta{\mathcal e})^2\rangle_\mathrm{sph } & = & { \mathcal a}\,{\mathcal e}^2\;\frac{32 - 4\sqrt{{\mathcal r}}}{15\sqrt{{\mathcal r } } } , \\ \langle(\delta{\mathcal r})^2\rangle_\mathrm{sph } & = & { \mathcal a}\,{\mathcal r}\,\frac{58 + 32\sqrt{{\mathcal r}}-90{\mathcal r}}{15 } , \\ \langle(\delta{\mathcal r}_z)^2\rangle_\mathrm{sph}&= & \langle(\delta{\mathcal r})^2\rangle_\mathrm{sph } \left(\frac{{\mathcal r}_z}{{\mathcal r}}\right)^2 + \frac{2{\mathcal a}}{15 } ( { \mathcal r}-{\mathcal r}_z ) \nonumber \\ & \times & \frac{{\mathcal r}_z}{{\mathcal r } } \big [ 9{\mathcal r}+ 29(1-{\mathcal r } ) \cos^2\omega\big ] , \label{eq_difcoefrz2 } \ ] ] @xmath171 where @xmath172 here @xmath173 is the mass of a field star ( scatterer ) and @xmath174 is the mass of a test star ( whose evolution is described by the fokker - planck equation ) . we set @xmath175 in what follows . the density of states @xmath176 is split into two factors : @xmath177 so that @xmath178 is the phase space volume element that transforms @xmath17 to the number density of stars @xmath179 in the spherical geometry : @xmath180 these coefficients are based on the usual approximation of uncorrelated two - body encounters . the effect of resonant relaxation @xcite would be to enhance the diffusion coefficients for @xmath78 and @xmath75 ; we defer a discussion of this until [ sec_nbody ] . finally , the diffusion coefficients are expressed in terms of @xmath181 by substituting @xmath182 from equation ( [ eq_calh ] ) , transforming the above coefficients under this substitution according to equation ( [ eq_transform_angled_coefs ] ) , and averaging over the argument of periastron ( i.e. the precession phase ) @xmath46 : @xmath183 we have explicitly written the jacobian of transformation ( [ eq_transform_jacobian ] ) , and the coefficients with tildes are transformed from @xmath184 using ( [ eq_transform_angled_coefs ] ) . this is possible because the last transformation does not depend on @xmath45 or @xmath48 . the limits of integration in ( [ eq_coef_avg_omega ] ) are between 0 and @xmath107 for tubes and between @xmath185 and @xmath186 for saucers ( equation [ eq_omega_min ] ) . from here on , we omit the subscript for the averaged coefficients . the averaging must be done numerically , however , we can derive asymptotic expressions for the diffusion coefficients in the large- and small-@xmath78 regimes . in the former case , when @xmath187 , @xmath188 , so we trivially get @xmath189 , @xmath190 . in the limit of small @xmath78 , i.e. close to the capture boundary , the asymptotic behavior of the coefficients is different in the tube and saucer regions . in the case of tube orbits with @xmath191 , the asymptotic expressions are @xmath192 where @xmath193 ; the other two diffusion coefficients are smaller that @xmath194 by a factor @xmath195 . for saucer orbits with @xmath196 and not too close to either the separatrix or the fixed - point orbit , the asymptotic expressions for the diffusion coefficients are estimated to within @xmath197 as @xmath198 @xmath199 finally , it is convenient to cast the orbit - averaged fokker - planck equation ( [ eq_fporbitavg ] ) into flux - conservative form : @xmath200 the drift and diffusion coefficients are [ eq_difcoefs_definition ] @xmath201 this form is convenient from both from a computational and a physical point of view , since ( i ) it manifestly conserves the total number of stars , and ( ii ) drift coefficients @xmath202 and @xmath203 must be zero , which may be demonstrated explicitly , or inferred from the natural requirement that ( in the absence of capture ) collisions tend to isotropize @xmath17 , i.e. in the steady state @xmath17 should not depend on @xmath78 or @xmath75 . as is well known , the steady - state loss rate in the spherical geometry can only be inferred from the orbit - averaged fokker - planck equation if a certain condition is satisfied : the change in angular momentum over one radial period due to encounters must be small for orbits near the loss cone . far enough from the sbh , this condition is violated ( the `` pinhole '' or `` full - loss - cone '' regime ) and the orbit - averaged approximation is not valid . this problem is dealt with by returning to the local @xmath204 fokker - planck equation and allowing the phase - space density to vary along orbits , from zero at the edge of the capture sphere to some finite value at apoapsis @xcite . the result is a boundary condition for the fokker - planck equation that specifies the value and slope of @xmath205 at @xmath206 in terms of its average value at the ( fixed ) energy @xmath207 . no such exact analysis has ever been carried out in nonspherical ( axisymmetric , triaxial ) geometries , nor will we do so here . instead we will be satisfied with a more heuristic derivation of the relation between @xmath17 and @xmath208 at the loss cone boundary . our analysis will be similar in spirit to that of @xcite , but , as we will see , with some important differences . we begin by reviewing the boundary conditions in the spherical geometry . the evolution equation in terms of @xmath207 and @xmath78 can be derived by integrating equation ( [ eq_fpflux ] ) over @xmath75 from 0 to @xmath78 . we introduce two , two - dimensional quantities : the number density of stars , @xmath209 and the flux per unit energy in the @xmath78-direction : @xmath210 the relation between @xmath211 and the fluxes appearing in equation ( [ eq_fpflux ] ) is that the former is the integral , over the entire loss cone boundary , of the component of @xmath212 normal to that boundary , in the subspace @xmath213 . in the spherical case , the capture boundary in the @xmath214 plane is defined by @xmath206 , and so @xmath215 . as emphasized by @xcite , in the spherical geometry , changes in angular momentum are expected to dominate the capture rate . setting @xmath216 constant , we consider one - dimensional diffusion in @xmath78 , which obeys @xmath217 the final expression uses the result that for small @xmath78 , @xmath218 . also in this limit , @xmath219 , and we can write @xmath220 an inverse , orbit - averaged relaxation time . if we adopt the approximation @xmath221 over the entire range of @xmath78 , then equation ( [ eq_dif_1d ] ) is mathemathically equivalent to the heat conduction equation in a circular domain @xcite . the steady - state solution is @xmath222 . the natural boundary condition at @xmath112 is @xmath223 , which in this approximation translates to @xmath224 ( in the more exact treatment , @xmath225 itself tends to zero at @xmath112 ) . the boundary at @xmath206 is responsible for capture , however , simply setting @xmath226 is not always appropriate . as discussed by @xcite , there are two regimes characterizing the behavior of @xmath179 near loss cone boundary , depending on the ratio @xmath227 between the radial period and the time to random - walk out of the loss cone ( that is , to change @xmath78 by order of @xmath228 ) : @xmath229 the case @xmath230 is the `` empty loss cone '' regime , since a star scattered into the region @xmath231 is swallowed much faster than encounters can scatter it back out . the opposite situation , @xmath232 , is the `` full - loss - cone '' regime , because diffusion is so rapid that even capture of stars ( near periapsis ) does not substantially diminish the population of loss cone orbits away from periapsis . it turns out that much of the flux into the sbh comes from stars at energies where @xmath233 , so the behavior of the solution at the transition between the two regimes is important . let @xmath234 , and define @xmath235 , the flux through the boundary ( i.e. the number of stars captured per unit time per unit energy ) . in a steady state , equation ( [ eq_dif_1d ] ) implies that @xmath211 is independent of @xmath78 near @xmath228 . we can express the inner boundary condition in a general way as @xmath236 where all quantities are understood to be functions of @xmath207 , or equivalently of @xmath237 . after usinq equations ( [ equation : nofer ] ) and ( [ equation : fluxrofe ] ) to express @xmath179 and @xmath211 in terms of @xmath17 and @xmath238 , equation ( [ eq_boundary_cond_spher ] ) is seen to be a boundary condition of the robin type ( linear combination of function and its derivative ) @xcite . the dimensionless coefficient @xmath239 can be derived by returning to the local ( non - orbit - averaged ) fokker - planck equation and determining how @xmath17 varies with radial phase assuming @xmath240 at periapsis @xcite . @xcite produced a numerical solution in the spherical geometry and proposed the approximation @xmath241 for @xmath242 and @xmath243 for @xmath244 . an exact solution exists to the same set of equations solved by cohn & kulsrud : @xmath245 @xcite , where @xmath246 are consecutive zeros of the bessel function @xmath247 . equation ( [ equation : besselalpha ] ) is unwieldy ; a good approximation is @xmath248 which has the asymptotic forms @xmath249 these expressions differ most strongly near @xmath250 , where the exact solution ( [ equation : besselalpha ] ) gives @xmath251 . cohn & kulsrud s approximation is @xmath252 while equation ( [ eq_alpha_q ] ) gives @xmath253 . in terms of @xmath239 , the variation of @xmath179 with @xmath78 near the loss cone boundary is [ eq_f_near_lc_spher ] @xmath254 here @xmath255 plays the role of the effective absorbing boundary at which @xmath256 . it is convenient to introduce the `` draining rate '' of a uniformly - populated loss cone : @xmath257 this is the capture rate that results if the following two conditions are satisfied : ( i ) the distribution function is constant inside the loss cone , with value @xmath258 ; ( ii ) the volume of the loss cone ( per unit energy ) , @xmath259 , is emptied every radial period . as is apparent from its definition , @xmath260 does not depend on the diffusion coefficient @xmath261 . we can rewrite the boundary condition ( [ eq_boundary_cond_spher ] ) in terms of @xmath260 as @xmath262 in the full - loss - cone regime , @xmath263 and the capture rate is @xmath264 ; otherwise @xmath265 , reflecting the fact that the phase space density decreases to zero at some @xmath266 ( [ eq_r0 ] ) . define @xmath267 to be the integral of @xmath268 over angular momenta : @xmath269 roughly speaking , @xmath270 is the quantity that would be inferred from an observed radial density profile , for instance , via eddington s formula ( e.g. * ? ? ? * equation 3.47 ) . if we extrapolate the logarithmic solution ( [ eq_f_near_lc_spher ] ) to all @xmath78 , we can relate @xmath271 and the capture rate @xmath272 to @xmath273 : @xmath274 in the full - loss - cone regime , @xmath232 , the distribution function is almost isotropic ( @xmath275 ) , and @xmath276 that is : the full volume of the loss cone is consumed every radial period , and @xmath260 and @xmath272 are equivalent . this also means that the exact value of the diffusion coefficient or even the very process responsible for shuffling orbits in @xmath78 does not affect the capture rate , as long as it is efficient enough to keep the loss cone full . in the opposite limit of @xmath277 , @xmath278 now the capture rate is limited by diffusion from larger @xmath78 , that is , by the gradient of @xmath179 near @xmath228 . the distribution function is depleted at small @xmath78 . here we note a distinction that will be important when discussing the axisymmetric problem . equation ( [ eq_fdrain ] ) expresses @xmath260 in terms of the value of @xmath179 at the loss cone boundary . in the spherical case , the full - loss - cone boundary condition ( @xmath279 ) implies @xmath280 ( equation [ eq_f_global_spher ] ) . this is because the same process gravitational scattering is responsible both for populating loss - cone orbits uniformly with respect to radial phase and for driving the global shape of @xmath205 towards isotropy . as we will see , the same is not necessarily true in the axisymmetric geometry , because these two actions are driven by different processes : the latter is always attributed to two - body relaxation ( scattering ) , but the former may also be driven by regular precession . in what follows , we use the terms `` empty '' and `` full '' loss - cone regimes to distinguish between the cases when the flux @xmath281 and @xmath282 , respectively , whatever the global shape of the solution . in the spherical problem , the transition between the two regimes is naturally defined as @xmath283 ( so that expressions ( [ eq_fflc ] ) and ( [ eq_felc ] ) are equal ) . sometimes another definition is used , based on the requirement that the draining rate equals the repopulation rate from nearby regions in phase space , implying @xmath250 . in [ sec_nbody ] we denote the energy of the former transition as @xmath284 and the latter as @xmath285 , in reference to the fact that these conditions are based either on the global shape of the solution or on its local properties near the capture boundary . returning to the time - dependent equation ( [ eq_dif_1d ] ) , if @xmath286 , an analytic solution exists in terms of bessel functions @xcite . if we take @xmath287 as the initial condition , where @xmath288 is the heaviside step function , then the logarithmic profile is established after @xmath289 , and the flux @xmath272 , after the initial transient , is well described by the quasi - steady - state value ( [ eq_capt_rate_spher ] ) . numerical solutions to equation ( [ eq_dif_1d ] ) without the simplifying assumption @xmath290 are found to match the analytical solution very well ( to within a few percent ) . in [ sec_nbody ] we will refer to both the quasi - stationary flux value and the time - dependent solution . one should keep in mind that the capture rate in the time - dependent case may be substantially higher than the stationary flux for @xmath291 , at least in the empty - loss - cone regime ; sometimes the ratio can be more than an order of magnitude ( e.g. * ? ? ? * ) . this , however , depends critically on the details of the initial distribution . if instead of a step - function at @xmath228 one starts from a profile with a larger area @xmath292 where the distribution function has been depleted , for example , as a result of a binary smbh scattering away stars with periapsides smaller than the binary separation , then initially the capture rate is , conversely , much lower than the stationary flux @xcite . we first summarize the various time scales in the axisymmetric geometry . the three times defined above that characterize motion in the smooth potential satisfy @xmath293 where @xmath294 ( equation [ eq_trad ] ) is the radial ( keplerian ) period , @xmath66 ( equation [ eq_tprec ] ) is the approximate time for @xmath46 to change by @xmath295 due to the spherically - distributed mass , and @xmath106 ( equation [ eq_tosc ] ) is the oscillation time for @xmath78 due to torquing from the axisymmetric component of the potential . the latter inequality is strongest for saucer orbits that are near the separatrix and which precess very slowly ( figure [ fig_rminmax ] ) . the two - body relaxation time can be estimated from the diffusion coefficients by taking the inverse of the common dimensional factor @xmath296 , equation ( [ eq_difcoefa ] ) : @xmath297 this time is smaller by a factor 0.87 than the more standard definition of the relaxation time in terms of local density and velocity dispersion ( cf . @xcite , equation 5.61 ) . clearly @xmath298 . @xcite used the term `` loss wedge '' to describe the set of orbits which can be captured by the sbh in the absense of relaxation , i.e. if their angular momentum falls below @xmath228 at some phase of the precession cycle , or , equivalently , if @xmath299 . the name reflects the fact that this region is elongated in the @xmath74 direction much more than in @xmath75 ( figure [ fig_phaseplane ] ) : its boundary is defined by setting @xmath300 in equation ( [ eq_capture_boundary ] ) . in what follows , we define @xmath301 as the value of the distribution function at the loss wedge boundary , which we approximate to be constant throughout the loss wedge , and @xmath302 as the capture rate of stars per unit energy : @xmath303 here @xmath304 and @xmath305 are fluxes defined in equation ( [ eq_fpflux ] ) , @xmath306 is the lowest possible value of @xmath74 ( [ eq_hlcfpo ] ) for orbits outside the loss wedge , and the two terms in the last integral give the contributions to the capture rate from the `` downward '' flux in the @xmath74 direction in the tube region of phase plane and the `` upward '' flux in the saucer region ( see figure [ fig_phaseplane ] ) . signs are chosen so that @xmath302 is the positive rate of capture . we now argue that it is the flux in the @xmath75 direction in the saucer region that provides the main contribution to the total capture rate , in the case @xmath307 . from equations ( [ eq_coef_asympt_sau ] ) , ( [ eq_difcoefs_definition_b ] ) we see that @xmath308 . the capture boundary ( [ eq_capture_boundary ] ) is almost parallel to the vertical ( @xmath74 ) axis in this region , with the slope @xmath309 . if we assume that @xmath310 has a certain gradient perpendicular to the capture boundary line , then its derivatives are in a similar relation : @xmath311 . the fluxes @xmath305 and @xmath304 in ( [ eq_fpflux ] ) are then comparable in magnitude ; however , in equation ( [ eq_capt_rate_total_flux ] ) the former flux is integrated in @xmath312 on an interval of length @xmath313 , while the latter is integrated in @xmath314 on an interval of @xmath228 . therefore , the contribution from the flux in the @xmath75 direction is the largest in the saucer region . from similar arguments we estimate that in the tube region the flux in the @xmath74 direction is dominant . finally , if @xmath315 , most of the loss wedge lies in the saucer orbit region , so it gives the largest overall contribution to the total capture rate @xmath302 . ( this is true only asymptotically ; as shown in the next section , even for @xmath316 the tube and saucer regions give roughly equal contribution ) . the number of stars ( per unit energy ) inside the loss wedge is given by denotes the _ integral _ of the distribution function over the loss region , not its _ value _ at the boundary as in ( [ equation : nofer ] ) . ] @xmath317 where the boundaries of the region of integration are given by @xmath318 and equation ( [ eq_capture_boundary ] ) , and we have taken @xmath17 to be constant ( @xmath301 ) within this region and used the asymptotic expression ( [ eq_coef_asympt_sau ] ) for @xmath152 in the saucer region ( which gives the main contribution to the integral in the case @xmath315 ) . the number of stars which are instantaneously inside the loss cone ( @xmath115 ) is essentially the same as in the spherical case : @xmath319 . this is an expected result : in the axisymmetric case , the effective volume of the loss region increases by a factor @xmath320 , but the probability for any star inside this loss region having an angular momentum less than the capture threshold decreases by the same factor . we are now in a position to derive the boundary condition , i.e. , to relate the capture rate @xmath302 to the value of @xmath17 at the boundary of the loss wedge , @xmath301 . an orbit inside the loss _ wedge _ is captured if its instantaneous value of @xmath78 is less than @xmath228 , i.e. , if it is in the loss _ cone _ , during periapsis passage . here , as in the spherical case , there are two possible regimes . if the radial period is short compared with the time required for an orbit to pass the minimum of its precession cycle while having @xmath115 , then every orbit in the loss wedge will be captured in a time no longer than one precession period . we call this the `` empty loss wedge '' regime . the rate of consumption of stars per unit energy , @xmath302 , is then given by the number of stars inside the loss wedge , @xmath321 , divided by their lifetime on these orbits , @xmath106 : @xmath322 in the opposite limit , a star that achieves @xmath115 while being far from the sbh may precess out of the loss cone before reaching periapsis , similar to what happens in the full - loss - cone case of the spherical problem . then the capture rate is less than given by the above equation , because not all stars in the loss wedge are captured after one precession period . it is easy to see that in this case , which can be called the `` full loss wedge regime '' , the rate of consumption is equivalent to the draining rate of the full loss cone ( [ eq_fdrain ] ) . in other words , the precession is fast and shuffles stars in angular momentum quickly enough that the loss cone stays full , hence the capture rate is just the instantaneous number of stars inside the loss cone divided by their radial period . by ignoring the effects of a finite precessional time , @xcite were essentially in this regime . by analogy with the spherical case , we introduce the quantity @xmath323 separating the two regimes : @xmath324 it is easy to see that @xmath325 at the radius of influence , where @xmath326 , as long as the flattening is not too small ( @xmath327 ) . unlike the spherical problem , the transition from empty- to full - loss - wedge regimes always occurs well within the radius of influence , and therefore the main contribution to the total capture rate comes from the full - loss - wedge regime . moreover , for most realistic cases @xmath328 for the entire range of radii . indeed , combining expresssions ( [ eq_tprec ] , [ eq_q_spher ] , [ eq_trel ] , [ eq_q_axi ] ) and substituting @xmath329 , where @xmath40 is the orbit semimajor axis , we obtain @xmath330 this ratio decreases with radius ; evaluating it at @xmath331 and substituting @xmath332 ( see [ sec_estimates ] ) , @xmath333 , where @xmath334 is the velocity dispersion of stars outside @xmath7 , and @xmath335 , we may rewrite the above expression as @xmath336 which is likely to be @xmath337 if the flattening is not too small . in other words : changes in angular momentum near the loss cone boundary are determined by the regular precession ( @xmath323 ) , and not by relaxation ( @xmath227 ) . to summarize , the boundary condition in the axisymmetric problem is @xmath338 and the relation between the flux and the value of @xmath17 at the boundary , expressed in the same way as in the spherical problem ( [ eq_boundary_cond_spher ] ) , reads @xmath339 the derivation above only gives this relation in `` integrated '' form , that is , one coefficient @xmath340 for the entire @xmath341 plane at a given energy . while this is certainly an oversimplification , we argue below that it does not greatly affect the capture rate . the distinction between empty and full loss cones in the spherical problem depends on whether @xmath281 ( equation [ eq_flux_sph ] ) or not , or equivalently whether @xmath342 . in the spherical case , @xmath343 , and the transition occurs at @xmath233 . in the axisymmetric problem , the distinction between empty and full loss _ wedges _ is whether @xmath281 or not , and the transition is at @xmath344 . in most realistic cases , @xmath328 , although it is not necessarily true that @xmath345 . therefore , the coefficient @xmath340 in the boundary condition ( [ eq_boundary_cond_axi ] ) can be both greater or less than its spherical counterpart @xmath239 ( equation [ eq_alpha_q ] ) for the same @xmath207 and @xmath228 . in the case @xmath346 ( full loss cone of the spherical problem ) there is essentially no difference in boundary conditions since @xmath323 is also greater than @xmath347 . in the opposite case ( @xmath348 ) , @xmath349 regardless of the value of @xmath323 , and the capture rate turns out to depend only weakly on it , as argued in the next section . in this latter case @xmath323 may be both greater or less than unity , i.e. the loss wedge may be either empty or full . however , as we noted above , the relation between the capture rate and @xmath350 in the axisymmetric problem depends not only on the boundary condition , but also on the structure of the entire solution , as addressed in the next section . we are primarily interested here in the capture rate , i.e. the flux of stars into the sbh , and not in the evolution of the mass distribution ( density profile , flattening ) which we assume to be fixed . the flux is determined mainly by diffusion in angular momentum . accordingly , we consider the two - dimensional fokker - planck equation describing evolution in ( @xmath109 ) and neglect diffusion in energy . we note that most of our results are quoted for a density profile @xmath351 which is reasonably close to the bahcall - wolf stationary solution , @xmath352 , further justifying the neglect of energy evolution . to date , all studies of axisymmetric systems assumed that the distribution function depends only on the two classical integrals of motion , @xmath207 and @xmath75 . then it is easy to show that @xmath353 for @xmath354 . indeed , from ( [ eq_difcoefrz2 ] ) we see that @xmath355 for small @xmath75 , and from ( [ eq_densityofstates ] ) that the density of states @xmath356 . then the total capture rate per unit energy is @xmath357 , and should be independent of @xmath75 , which leads to the square - root profile of @xmath358 . @xcite used this argument to derive the relation between the capture rate @xmath208 and the average value of the distribution function at a given energy @xmath350 , as follows . start by writing the relation between @xmath208 and the value of @xmath17 at the loss wedge boundary @xmath359 , which corresponds essentially to the full loss wedge regime ( equation [ eq_boundary_cond_axi ] with @xmath360 ) . then express the integrated flux in the @xmath75 direction as @xmath361 independent of @xmath75 . the numerical factor @xmath362 is related to the `` area of the loss wedge '' , @xmath363 , where @xmath364 is the peak angular momentum of saucer orbits and may be associated with our definition of @xmath123 . the distribution function is then @xmath365 the average distribution function is @xmath366 where @xmath367 is the fraction of the phase space volume at a given @xmath75 . @xcite took @xmath368 ; a more correct value is @xmath369 . using their value , one finds @xmath370 the correct expression would contain @xmath371 instead of @xmath372 in the brackets . the relation between the steady - state capture rate per unit energy and the average ( isotropized ) value of the distribution function is @xmath373 where @xmath374 . comparing of this expression with the analogous one in the spherical case ( [ eq_capt_rate_spher ] ) , we see that when @xmath375 , the capture rate is essentially the same as in the spherical case ( full - loss - cone regime ) , while in the opposite limit it is determined by the diffusion coefficient @xmath261 and the value of @xmath123 , rather than by the size of the loss cone @xmath228 . this is a consequence of the geometry of loss wedge boundary , which stretches in one direction to a fixed fraction @xmath123 of the phase space . @xmath376 @xmath72{fig4_f_r.eps}\ ] ] @xmath72{fig5_reff.eps}\ ] ] we set up an initially uniform ( isotropic ) distribution ( @xmath377 ) in the @xmath341 plane outside the capture boundary , defined by equating @xmath228 and @xmath79 found from equation([eq_rminmax ] ) ( @xmath81 for saucers and @xmath82 for tubes ) ; a series of isolines of constant @xmath79 is plotted in figure [ fig_phaseplane ] . we studied a range of values for both @xmath123 and @xmath315 , as well as various parameters @xmath340 in the boundary condition ( [ eq_alpha_axi ] ) . the numerical solution of equation ( [ eq_fpflux ] ) was obtained on a non - uniform rectangular grid using two different sets of coordinates , defined such that the capture boundaries are parallel to the coordinate axes ( see appendix [ sec_appendix_coords ] for details ) ; grid sizes were typically @xmath378 in each dimension and the loss region was resolved by 10 - 20% of the grid cells . we advanced the solutions until time @xmath379 to achieve a steady - state profile , from which we could extract the relation between the capture rate and the average value of @xmath17 . in the spherical case , the solution is controlled by two parameters ( aside from @xmath261 which scales the time ) : the capture boundary @xmath228 and the boundary coefficient @xmath239 ( or @xmath227 ) . as regards the steady - state profile , these two parameters are not independent , since one can always transform the problem to another ( primed ) one with @xmath380 and @xmath381 ( equation [ eq_r0 ] ) , so the family of solution is effectively one - parametric . to compare the time - dependent solution of the axisymmetric problem to the spherical case , we introduce the concept of `` equivalent spherical problem '' , that is , the one - dimensional problem with the same coefficient @xmath239 in the boundary condition as @xmath340 in equation ( [ eq_alpha_axi ] ) , and with some effective capture boundary @xmath382 chosen such that the time - dependend capture rate closely follows that of the axisymmetric problem . our goal is then to find @xmath382 as a function of the loss cone size @xmath228 and degree of flattening , the latter parametrized by @xmath123 . in the remainder of this section we present simple analytical arguments that give a qualitatively correct description of the two - dimensional numerical solution of the axisymmetric problem , and provide a fitting formula for @xmath382 . figure [ fig_streamlines ] shows stream lines of flux and isocontours of @xmath17 in a quasi - stationary 2d solution for a rather exaggerated value of @xmath383 . even in this case , most of the stream lines end inside the saucer region , and that is definitely so for more realistic ( smaller ) values of @xmath228 . it is also clear that in the saucer region , @xmath17 depends mainly on @xmath75 and is almost independent of the second coordinate , which justifies the square - root profile of @xmath358 as in equation ( [ eq_f_rz ] ) , but only in this region . in the tube region , for the greater part of the phase space ( @xmath384 ) , the solution is close to that of the spherical problem , that is , @xmath385 , with @xmath386 experiencing only small oscillations . we can build an approximate solution by joining the two asymptotic forms at @xmath123 . a better description for the saucer region accounts for the fact that the flux in the @xmath75 direction gradually decreases from @xmath208 at the capture boundary to zero at @xmath123 : @xmath387 @xmath388 is the minimum value of @xmath74 , corresponding to the fixed - point saucer orbit ( [ eq_fpo ] ) . the second , approximate equality in equation ( [ eq_fluxrz_corr ] ) is an empirical fit to the numerical 2d solution . using the asymptotic expressions ( [ eq_coef_asympt_sau ] ) , it is easy to show that for @xmath389 the flux has the form ( [ eq_fluxrz ] ) , with the numerical coefficient @xmath390 ( which is @xmath391 larger than the value used by @xcite ) . the solution in the saucer region is obtained by solving the differential equation ( [ eq_fluxrz_corr ] ) : @xmath392 which is a somewhat improved form of equation ( [ eq_f_rz ] ) . the solution in the tube region outside @xmath123 is approximated by @xmath393 the coefficient of the logarithmic term gives the same flux in the @xmath78 direction as in the spherical problem , and @xmath394 . figure [ fig_rprofile ] shows the two asymptotic expressions along with the actual numerical solution . we compute the isotropized value @xmath350 taking into account only the contribution from @xmath395 , which introduces a fractional error of at most @xmath123 : @xmath396 putting all this together and expressing the relation between @xmath208 and @xmath273 in terms of the coefficient @xmath340 ( [ eq_boundary_cond_axi ] ) , we obtain @xmath397 equation ( [ eq_capt_rate_axi_approx ] ) can be compared with equation ( [ eq_fluxmt ] ) of @xcite : both share the property of being independent of @xmath228 , replacing it with some effective capture boundary @xmath382 for the empty - loss - cone regime , although this effective value is different . by comparing ( [ eq_capt_rate_axi_approx ] ) with the spherical analog ( [ eq_capt_rate_spher ] ) , we see that in our approximation , @xmath398 . figure [ fig_reff ] shows that equation ( [ eq_capt_rate_axi_approx ] ) predicts well the flux in the numerical steady - state solutions ; a better approximation to the effective capture boundary and the capture rate is @xmath399 overall , the capture rates in the axisymmetric geometry are higher than in the spherical case with the same boundary condition @xmath400 , but not by a large factor : in the full - loss - cone regime ( @xmath401 ) they are essentially the same , while in the empty - loss - cone regime the effective boundary @xmath382 is higher than @xmath228 , but since the flux depends on it only logarithmically , the difference is not likely to be more than a factor of a few . of course , more relevant is a comparison that takes into account that @xmath239 in the spherical case may be different from @xmath340 for the same values of @xmath207 and @xmath228 , as noted near the end of the previous section . for the least bound stars which are in the full - loss - cone regime ( @xmath402 ) , @xmath325 and @xmath403 . in this case , the capture rate does not depend on the diffusion coefficient @xmath404 but only on the value of @xmath228 . the boundary condition ( [ eq_boundary_cond_axi ] ) states that the flux @xmath302 is proportional to the average , isotropized value @xmath405 , and @xmath261 cancels out . in the opposite case @xmath406 , the capture rate is limited by diffusion , and @xmath407 is no longer close to isotropic . if @xmath408 , @xmath340 is also @xmath409 , and the denominator in the expression for the capture rate ( [ eq_capt_rate_axi ] ) tends to some constant value which depends only on @xmath123 , but not on @xmath227 or @xmath228 ( provided that @xmath315 ) . it is largely irrelevant whether the boundary condition itself corresponds to the empty ( @xmath410 ) or full - loss - wedge regime . in other words , in this _ diffusion - limited regime _ ( both in spherical and axisymmetric cases ) the boundary conditions ( [ eq_boundary_cond_spher ] ) or ( [ eq_boundary_cond_axi ] ) determine @xmath258 for a given flux @xmath272 , which itself is set by the gradient of the overall steady - state profile of solution . by comparison , in the spherical case the denominator in the expression for the capture rate ( [ eq_capt_rate_spher ] ) also depends only weakly ( logarithmically ) on @xmath228 and is almost independent of @xmath239 . therefore , the difference in capture rates between the axisymmetric and spherical problems , which results from the difference between @xmath411 and @xmath412 , is at most a factor of few in the case @xmath406 . the fokker - planck formalism developed in the previous sections relied on the existence of three integrals of motion deep inside the sbh influence region . apart from some special , fully integrable cases ( e.g. * ? ? ? * ) , most axisymmetric potentials containing central point masses are characterized by chaotic motion in the low - angular - momentum parts of phase space beyond the influence radius . chaotic orbits still respect two integrals of the motion , @xmath207 and @xmath75 , but in the absence of a third integral , they can in principle fill the accessible region in the meridional plane , allowing them to be captured as long as @xmath413 . we estimate the capture rate from these orbits by the following argument , similar to an argument of @xcite . first we introduce the concept of draining of the loss region , arising from non - conservaton of angular momentum without any relaxation effects , then estimate the role of relaxation , and finally discuss the combined effects of draining and relaxation . assume that the chaotic orbits occupy a region in the @xmath214 plane with @xmath414 . the value of @xmath415 plays the same role as @xmath123 inside the radius of influence , and is comparable to it for the same degree of flattening . furthermore , we assume that every chaotic orbit with a given @xmath75 can attain values of @xmath416 $ ] with equal probability ( numerical tests verify that this is a reasonable assumption ) . recall that the number of stars with given @xmath417 , which may be identified with the probability of finding a star in a given interval of @xmath418 , is @xmath419 , with @xmath420 given by equation ( [ eq_densityofstates ] ) . then the fraction of time such an orbit spends below the capture boundary is @xmath421 , and this is essentially the probability of being captured during one radial period ( assuming the full - loss - cone boundary condition , i.e. that the change in angular momentum during one period is much larger than the capture boundary , which is reasonable for chaotic orbits ) . next we evaluate the time - dependent rate of capture of stars from chaotic orbits . from the above argument it follows that we need to consider @xmath358 decaying exponentially at every value of @xmath75 from its initial value @xmath422 , but with a different rate : @xmath423 .\ ] ] the total number of chaotic orbits with @xmath413 and their capture rate is then given by @xmath424 where @xmath425 from here it is clear that if we identify @xmath422 with the initial value of the distribution function in the loss cone @xmath258 , then the capture rate is initially equal to the draining rate of a uniformly populated loss cone ( [ eq_fdrain ] ) . in particular , when @xmath426 , we recover the standard , full - loss - cone draining rate , regardless of the value of @xmath415 . on the other hand , the draining time does depend on @xmath415 , since the number of stars in the chaotic region to be drained is @xmath427 times larger than the number of stars in the loss cone , therefore the draining time is longer than the radial period by the same factor . at times much longer than the draining time , the capture rate declines as @xmath428 , not exponentially , since it is dominated by the draining of chaotic orbits with @xmath429 . there is a great deal of similarity between the capture rates from the loss wedge of the saucer region of phase space for regular orbits within the radius of influence , and the chaotic region outside it . the details of draining are somewhat different ( in particular , for the regular orbits the draining rate declines as @xmath430 , as noted by @xcite ) , but since the draining time for saucer orbits is usually much shorter than a hubble time , we ignore that distinction and adopt the same expressions for them as for chaotic orbits . in both cases , the _ local _ boundary condition for the loss region corresponds to the full loss cone ( [ eq_boundary_cond_axi ] ) , at least for the case @xmath431 relevant for all but the most tightly bound orbits . however , the _ global _ shape of the steady - state solution depends on whether the overall flux into the low angular momentum region is limited by diffusion ( @xmath432 ) or not . in the first case , the steady - state solution will still have a logarithmic form for @xmath433 or @xmath123 , corresponding to some effective capture boundary @xmath382 , and the capture rate depends on this effective boundary only logarithmically . in the latter case , the capture rate is essentially the full loss cone rate for an isotropic distribution function . the latter case , however , is rarely attained because @xmath237 rapidly drops with decreasing binding energy . on the other hand , if the draining time for chaotic orbits is comparable to the hubble time , then their capture rate may still be quite high even in the absence of relaxation , provided that the initial value @xmath422 of the distribution function inside the chaotic region was not much different from the isotropic value @xmath350 . the combined effect of draining and relaxation may be approximately accounted for by the following recipe . let @xmath434 be the capture rate per unit energy from the fokker - planck equation with initial conditions corresponding to the loss region being initially empty ( i.e. the solution considered in [ sec_fp_solution ] ) . since the loss region initially may have some nonzero value of @xmath17 , @xmath435 , the phase - space gradient of @xmath17 near the loss region boundary will be less than arising in the fokker - planck solution , and the capture rate from relaxation alone may also be lower . we approximate the total capture rate by the sum of the draining rate @xmath436 and the collisional flux @xmath437 multiplied by @xmath438 , where @xmath439 is the number of chaotic orbits at @xmath440 with @xmath426 . this expression is used to compare fokker - planck models against @xmath5-body simulations in [ sec_nbody ] and to compute the capture rates for real galaxies in [ sec_estimates ] . it is important to note that the effective capture boundary @xmath382 defined in ( [ eq_reff_axi ] ) , as the parameter controlling the overall shape of the steady - state solution and the gradient of the distribution function ( and hence the capture rate due to diffusion ) , is not the same as the size of the loss region ( @xmath441 for saucer orbits , @xmath442 for chaotic orbits ) which determines the draining time . the former , being a fixed fraction of @xmath123 ( @xmath415 ) , is usually much larger than the latter . these results will be used in [ sec_nbody ] when we compare the model predictions with the results of @xmath5-body simulations . for completeness , and to put our results in a broader context , we briefly discuss the case when the stellar cusp around the sbh is triaxial . triaxial potentials support two distinct familes of tube orbits , circulating about the long and short axes of the triaxial figure @xcite . in addition , there is a new class of centrophilic regular orbits , the pyramids ( * ? ? ? * figure 11 ) . the defining feature of pyramids is that @xmath443 for all of them , and a star on such an orbit will eventually find its way into the sbh even without the assistance of collisional relaxation . the fraction of phase space occupied by pyramids is comparable to that of saucer orbits , i.e. @xmath313 . outside the radius of influence , the regular pyramid orbits are mostly replaced by chaotic orbits , which are however still centrophilic @xcite . .comparison of three geometries[tab_geoms ] [ cols="<,^,^,^ " , ] we scale the velocity unit of the dehnen model by identifying the line - of - sight velocity dispersion , @xmath444 , at the influence radius with the quantity @xmath334 in equation ( [ eq_mbhsigma ] ) ; this is reasonable given that @xmath445 is a weak function of projected radius @xmath446 for @xmath447 , with @xmath448 the half - light radius . ( in the case @xmath87 the central @xmath445 in the model lacking a sbhwas used . ) our models are thus defined by the two parameters @xmath449 . setting @xmath450 , we have @xmath451 pc for @xmath452 . the radius @xmath11 that defines the loss sphere around the sbhis the larger of the radius of tidal disruption , @xmath453 , and the ( newtonian ) periapsis of an orbit that just continues inside the event horizon . for the eccentric orbits that dominate the flux into the sbh , the latter quantity is @xmath454 for a schwarzschild ( nonrotating ) sbh @xcite ; this is the radius of periapsis of a keplerian orbit having the critical angular momentum . a star is tidally disrupted if the periapsis radius is less than @xmath455 ( e.g. * ? ? ? * equation 6.3 ) . here @xmath456 depends on the stellar equation of state and is @xmath457 for a solar - type main - sequence star . these disruption events , as opposed to direct captures , may be observed as optical and x - ray flares in otherwise quiescent galactic nuclei @xcite . from the condition @xmath458 we find that solar - type stars on eccentric orbits are disrupted ( not swallowed ) if @xmath459 ; disruption can occur for any @xmath460 if the star is on a less eccentric orbit , or for kerr sbhs even more massive than @xmath461 @xcite . red giants or agb stars can also be disrupted ( or at least tidally limited ) by sbhs more massive than @xmath461 @xcite . in what follows , we compute the total number of events associated with a given @xmath11 ; the ratio of number of tidal disruption flares to the total number of capture events is well studied in the literature and we do not consider it separately here . we used fokker - planck models to evaluate steady - state and time - dependent capture rates @xmath462 for galaxies after @xmath463 years starting from an initially isotropic distribution function , in both the spherical and axisymmetric geometries ( using our one - dimensional approximation of section [ sec_fp_solution ] ) , for @xmath464 . the latter value is meant to represent a `` typical , '' moderately - flattened system ; the results do not strongly depend on @xmath123 . in the time - dependent calculations , the initial conditions consisted of the isotropic models with loss - cone orbits removed ; as a result , these initial models are characterized by strong gradients of @xmath17 with respect to @xmath41 near the loss cone . overall , the calculation of total capture rate is done in the same way as in the previous section . the left panel of figure [ fig_rates ] shows results for two series of models : models with a steep ( @xmath465 ) central cusp and @xmath466 ; and models with shallow ( @xmath467 ) cores and @xmath468 . over the entire range of @xmath32 , the steady - state capture rates differ by only a factor of @xmath469 between spherical and axisymmetric geometries , consistent with the discussion near the end of [ sec_fp_solution ] . this result holds for any galactic model and depends only weakly on @xmath123 . the time - dependent rates are generally higher than in the steady state , due to the strong gradients in the initial conditions . especially for massive galaxies with long relaxation times , the approach to a steady state is slow and the flux at early stages is much higher than in equilibrium . for the most massive sbhs ( @xmath470 ) the draining time of the loss region becomes comparable to the hubble time and the capture rate is dominated by draining of chaotic orbits ( double - dashed line ) , reaching values up to @xmath471 yr@xmath472 at the upper end of the @xmath32 range . however , this should be regarded as a strong upper limit since we do not know the initial state : for instance , if the sbh formed as the result of a merger of a binary sbh , it is very likely that the low angular momentum region of phase space will have been depleted in the course of the binary s evolution , and the capture rates could initially be much _ lower _ than the steady - state values @xcite . the dependence of @xmath462 on @xmath32 for massive sbhscan be simply estimated as follows ( e.g. * ? ? ? the nuclei of massive galaxies are in the empty - loss - cone regime , so the flux per unit energy is roughly @xmath473 $ ] . the capture rate peaks at @xmath474 @xcite so the total flux is estimated as @xmath475 . assuming the @xmath476 relation , we obtain @xmath477 , and even the normalization constant evaluates to a reasonable @xmath478 yr@xmath472 for @xmath479 , despite the crudeness of the estimate . the right panel of figure [ fig_rates ] shows the uncertainties in the capture rate associated with the parameters @xmath239 and @xmath480 in the @xmath476 relation ( [ eq_mbhsigma ] ) and the slope of the density cusp @xmath481 . plotted are stationary capture rates for the spherical case ; other values scale roughly in the same proportion . the capture rates evaluated for a selection of individual galaxies from several previous studies are also plotted for comparison . it is clear that the scatter in the derived values is fairly large , about two orders of magnitude , although a general trend of decreasing rate with increasing @xmath32 is clear . comparing the inverted triangles in figure [ fig_rates]b with the double - dashed curve in figure [ fig_rates]a , we see that our estimates for the capture rate due to draining of chaotic orbits are substantially higher than those of @xcite . as argued above , this is most likely an overestimate resulting from simplistic initial conditions . it is also due partly to our selection of a different relation between the capture rate and the isotropized distribution function ; had we used their equation ( [ eq_fluxmt ] ) instead of our equation ( [ eq_capt_rate_axi_approx ] ) , the steady - state flux in the axisymmetric case would be factor of a few lower , although it should not affect the draining rate of centrophilic orbits which starts to dominate the capture rate at @xmath470 . overall , it is fair to say that our estimates predict capture rates in the range @xmath482 yr@xmath472 for less massive galaxies , and a few@xmath483 yr@xmath472 for giant galaxies with sbh masses in excess of @xmath461 . this is roughly consistent with the observationally derived estimates of rates of tidal disruption flares @xcite . ( axisymmetric ) nuclear flattening may increase these numbers by a factor of few , and triaxiality may have a more dramatic effect on the consumption rate of the most massive sbhs provided there are enough stars on centrophilic orbits . one potentially important feature of axisymmetric ( and triaxial ) systems is that most stars are consumed in the full - loss - cone regime of boundary conditions ( in spite of the fact that the angular momentum need not be isotropic ) . this means that stars approach the sbh with a wide distribution in periapsis radii , as opposed to `` barely touching '' the disruption sphere in the empty - loss - cone regime . as a consequence , many stars will be strongly tidally distorted before disruption , which may result in a distinct observational signature @xcite , although more recent studies show that the difference may not be so pronounced @xcite . we have considered collisional ( gravitational - encounter - drive ) relaxation processes near supermassive black holes ( sbhs ) in spherical and axisymmetric models of galactic nuclei . we derived a fokker - planck formalism and compared its predictions with direct @xmath5-body simulations of capture . inside the sbh radius of influence , the unperturbed motion of stars is regular , admitting three integrals of motion ( energy , @xmath1-component of the angular momentum @xmath2 , and secular hamiltonian @xmath74 ) . there are two families of orbits , tubes and saucers ; the latter exhibit large angular momentum variations and stars on saucer orbits approach much more closely to the sbh than would be expected based on their average angular momentum . regularity of the motion allowed us to write down the orbit - averaged fokker - planck equation and to calculate the diffusion coefficients based on the standard formalism . we discussed the appropriate boundary conditions for capture by the sbh , and numerically solved the two - dimensional ( @xmath484 ) fokker - planck equation . we showed that its solution can be well approximated by an equivalent one - dimensional solution for diffusion in angular momentum , given appropriate boundary conditions . an important difference with the spherical case is that the boundary condition at the loss region typically corresponds to the full - loss - cone regime , in the sense that a change in angular momentum per one orbital period is larger than the size of the loss cone . nevertheless , the global shape of the solution , and , consequently , the capture rate of stars , is determined by the diffusion coefficient ( inversely proportional to the relaxation time ) , and depends only weakly on the effective size of the loss region . this treatment was not entirely self - consistent , as it did not account for resonant relaxation or for the breakdown of the orbit - averaged approximation near or beyond the radius of influence , but it nevertheless suggests a conclusion which turns out to be robust : compared with the spherical case having the same _ real _ ( not _ effective _ ) capture boundary , the flux into the loss cone is higher in the axisymmetric case , but not by a large factor , and only in the regime where the loss cone would be empty in the spherical system . in the axisymmetric case , most of the stars find their way into the sbh while on saucer orbits . we also carried out a number of @xmath5-body integrations which were found to agree remarkably well with the corresponding fokker - planck models . the agreement was not limited to the number of captured stars ; other quantities like the distribution of energy of the captured stars , the loss cone population , the diffusion coefficients , and the change in angular momentum during one radial period prior to capture were also found to be well reproduced . we note , however , that the angular momentum diffusion is larger in @xmath5-body models for stars with high binding energies ( close to the sbh ) , which may be an indication of resonant relaxation not accounted for in the fokker - planck models ; nevertheless , its influence on the capture rate is likely to be small . we applied our fokker - planck formalism to realistic galaxies with sbh masses @xmath485 . we found that stationary capture rates are in the range @xmath486 yr@xmath472 in spherical galaxies and a factor @xmath469 higher in flattened systems , with an overall trend of decreasing event rate with increasing @xmath32 . time - dependent solutions were found to give generally higher estimated capture rates ; however , that result is likely to depend strongly on the assumed initial conditions @xcite . in particular , for massive ( @xmath470 ) sbhs in axisymmetric nuclei , the draining time of chaotic orbits just outside the radius of influence can be comparable to the hubble time ; if such orbits were not depleted by ( for instance ) the binary sbh that preceded the single sbh , capture rates might reach @xmath471yr@xmath472 . such high rates may be more relevant to triaxial galaxies in which the number of centrophilic orbits is likely to be large enough to maintain a full - loss - cone capture rate for a hubble time . the work was supported by the national science foundation via grant no . ast 1211602 and by the national aeronautics and space administration via grant no . nnx10af84 g . ev acknowledges the hospitality of the aspen center for physics . codes for computing capture rates in the spherical and axisymmetric geometries can be downloaded at http:@xmath487td.lpi.ru@xmath488@xmath489eugvas@xmath488losscone@xmath488 . abramovitz , m. & stegun , i. 1972 , handbook of mathematical functions ( new york : dover publications ) amaro - seoane p. , freitag m. , & spurzem r. 2004 , mnras , 352 , 655 bahcall , j. & wolf , r. 1976 , apj , 209 , 214 bahcall , j. & wolf , r. 1977 , apj , 216 , 883 baldwin , d. e. , cordey , j. g. , & watson , c. j. h. 1972 , nucl . fusion , 12 , 307 bar - or , b. , kupi , g. , alexander , t. 2013 , apj , 764 , 52 baumgardt h. , makino j. , ebisuzaki t. 2004 , apj , 613 , 1133 brockamp , m. , baumgardt , h. , & kroupa , p. 2011 , mnras , 418 , 1308 cohn , h. , & kulsrud , r. 1978 , apj , 226 , 1087 dehnen , w. 1993 , mnras , 265 , 250 dehnen , w. , & gerhard , o. 1993 , mnras , 261 , 311 donley , j. , brandt , w. , eracleous , m. , & boller , th . 2002 , aj , 124 , 1308 eilon , e. , kupi , g. & alexander , t. 2009 , apj , 698 , 641 einsel , ch . , & spurzem , r. 1999 , mnras , 302 , 81 eriksson , k. , estep , d. , hansbo , p. , & johnson , c. , 1996 , `` computational differential equations '' , cambridge university press , cambridge , uk evans , n. 1994 , mnras , 267 , 333 ferrarese , l. , & merritt , d. 2000 , apj , 539 , l9 fiestas , j. , spurzem , r. , & kim , e. 2006 , mnras , 373 , 677 fiestas , j. , & spurzem , r. 2010 , mnras , 405 , 194 fiestas , j. , porth , o. , berczik , p. , & spurzem , r. 2012 , mnras , 419 , 57 frank , j. , & rees , m. 1976 , mnras , 176 , 633 freitag , m. , benz , w. 2002 , a&a , 394 , 345 gaburov , e. , harfst , s. , portegies zwart , s. 2009 , new astron . , 14 , 630 gebhardt , k. , bender , r. , bower , g. , et al . 2000 , apj , 539 , l13 gerhard , o. , & binney , j. 1985 , mnras , 216 , 467 gezari , s. , basa , s. , martin , d. , et al . 2008 , apj , 676 , 944 goodman , j. 1983 , phd thesis , princeton univ . graham , a. , onken , c. , athanassoula , e. , & combes , f. 2011 , mnras , 412 , 2211 gltekin , k. , richstone , d. , gebhardt , k. , et al . 2009 , apj , 698 , 198 harfst , s. , gualandris , a. , merritt , d. , & mikkola , s. 2008 , mnras , 389 , 2 holley - bockelmann , k. , & sigurdsson , s. 2006 , arxiv : astro - ph/0601520 hopman , c. , & alexander , t. 2006 , apj , 645 , 1152 hunter , c. , & qian , e. 1993 , mnras , 262 , 401 kesden , m. 2012 , phys.rev.d , 85 , 024037 komossa , s. , & merritt , d. 2008 , apjl , 683 , l21 kozai , y. 1962 , aj , 67 , 591 lees , j. f. , & schwarzschild , m. 1992 , apj , 384 , 491 lidov , m. 1962 , planetary and space science , 9 , 719 lightman , a. , & shapiro , s. 1977 , apj , 211 , 244 lupton , r. , & gunn , j. 1987 , aj , 93 , 1106 lynden - bell , d. 1962 , mnras , 123 , 447 macleod , m. , guillochon , j. , & ramirez - ruiz , e. , 2012 , apj , 757 , 134 magorrian j. , & tremaine s. 1999 , mnras , 309 , 447 marconi , a. , & hunt , l. k. 2003 , , 589 , l21 mcconnell , n. , ma , c .- p . , gebhardt , k. , et al . 2011 , nature , 480 , 215 merritt , d. 1999 , in asp conf . 197 , dynamics of galaxies : from the early universe to the present , ed . f. combes , g. a. mamon , & v. charmandaris ( san francisco : asp ) , 221 merritt , d. , 2013 , dynamics and evolution of galactic nuclei , ( princeton : princeton university press ) merritt , d. , berczik , p. , & laun , f. 2007 , aj , 133 , 553 merritt , d. , & ferrarese , l. 2001 , apj , 547 , 140 merritt , d. , & poon , m. 2004 , apj , 606 , 788 merritt , d. , & quinlan , g. d. 1998 , apj , 498 , 625 merritt , d. , & valluri , m. 1999 , aj , 118 , 1177 merritt , d. , & vasiliev , e. 2011 , apj , 726 , 61 merritt , d. , & wang , j. 2005 , apjl , 621 , l101 mikkola , s. , & merritt , d. 2006 , mnras , 372 , 219 mikkola , s. , & merritt , d. 2008 , aj , 135 , 2398 milosavljevi , m. & merritt , d. 2003 , apj , 596 , 860 norman c. , & silk j. 1983 , apj , 266 , 502 zisik , m. n. 1993 , heat conduction ( new york : wiley ) poon , m. y. , & merritt , d. 2001 , apj , 549 , 192 preto , m. , merritt , d. , & spurzem , r. 2004 , apjl , 613 , l109 rauch , k. & tremaine , s. 1996 , new astron . , 1 , 149 richstone , d. 1982 , apj , 252 , 496 rosenbluth , m. , macdonald , w. , & judd , d. 1957 , phys.rev . , 107 , 1 saaf , a. f. 1968 , apj , 154 , 483 sambhus , n. & sridhar , s. 2000 , apj , 542 , 143 schwarzschild , m. 1979 , apj , 232 , 236 shapiro , s. , & marchant , a. 1978 , apj , 225 , 603 sirota , v. , ilyin , a. , zybin , k. , & gurevich , a. 2005 , jetp , 100 , 294 sridhar , s. & touma , j. 1997 , mnras , 287 , l1 sridhar , s. & touma , j. 1999 , mnras , 303 , 483 stone , n. , sari , r. , & loeb , a. , 2013 , mnras ( in press ) strubbe , l. & quataert , e. 2009 , mnras , 400 , 2070 syer , d. , & ulmer , a. 1999 , mnras , 306 , 35 tremaine , s. , gebhardt , k. , bender , r. , et al . 2002 , apj , 574 , 740 van velzen , s. , farrar , g. 2012 , epj web of conferences , 39 , 08002 vasiliev , e. 2013 , mnras , accepted wang , j. , & merritt , d. 2004 , apj , 600 , 149 will , c. 2012 , classical and quantum gravity , 29 , 217001 we discuss briefly the character of the motion in axisymmetric nuclei when the lowest - order post - newtonian ( pn ) corrections are included in the equations of motion . the 1pn accelerations imply an orbit - averaged rate of of periapsis advance @xmath490 ( * ? ? ? * equation ( 4.205 ) ) . the other elements of the osculating orbit exibit no secular variations at this pn order , and we ignore rotation of the sbh . expressed in terms of the dimensionless time variable @xmath63 defined in equation ( [ eq_motion ] ) , the relativistic precession rate becomes @xmath491 which can be added to the orbit - averaged equation of motion for @xmath46 , equation ( [ eq_motion ] ) . setting @xmath467 ( @xmath492 ) in the hamiltonian ( [ eq_happrox ] ) , the two nontrivial equations of motion become [ eq : dwdldtgr ] @xmath493 . \label{eq_dwdldtgrb}\end{aligned}\ ] ] if there is a fixed point , its angular momentum can be found by setting @xmath494 when @xmath100 , or @xmath495 as @xmath496 is increased from zero , the value of @xmath497 at the fixed point increases , reaching @xmath498 when @xmath499 for @xmath500 all orbits are tubes . for @xmath501 , where @xmath502 there is one family of tubes , passing below the fixed point in the @xmath503 plane , and a family of saucer - like orbits that librate around the fixed point . for @xmath504 , the separatrix encloses the fixed point and there are two families of tubes , at low and high angular momenta . in the latter case , the angular momentum associated with the separatrix at @xmath47 can be found by setting @xmath494 in equation ( [ eq_dwdldtgrb ] ) : @xmath505 @xmath506{fig_grorbits.eps}\ ] ] since @xmath507 , saucer - like orbits are present only when @xmath508 even when saucers are present , their angular momentum variations are limited by the relativistic term . a rough lower limit on the attainable angular momentum for saucers can be derived by equating the change in @xmath497 due to the torques over one gr precessional period to @xmath497 : @xmath509 which yields @xmath510 figure [ fig_grorbits ] shows numerical solutions of the equations of motion ( [ eq : dwdldtgr ] ) for @xmath511 and @xmath512 ; the nuclear flattening parameter has the same value as in figure 2 . the neglect of gr precession on the evolution of saucer orbits is justified if @xmath513 where the latter inequality expresses the fact that @xmath514 for direct captures and larger than that for tidal disruptions . requiring that @xmath515 and using equations ( [ eq_rinfl ] , [ eq_kappa ] , [ eq_ellmingr ] ) , we obtain [ eq_grcondition2 ] @xmath516 where the second line approximates @xmath333 . this is essentially the same condition that was obtained in @xcite for capture of pyramid orbits . since the quantity in the brackets is likely to be small ( unless @xmath517 is tiny ) , and because most of the flux into the sbh comes from orbits with @xmath518 , equation ( [ eq_grcondition2 ] ) suggests that relativity is not likely to be important for the total capture rate . here we give the exact expression for the orbit - averaged hamiltonian corresponding to the potential of equation ( [ eq_modelrhophi ] ) . it is convenient to express @xmath71 and @xmath1 in terms of eccentric anomaly @xmath456 rather than mean anomaly @xmath45 ( e.g. * ? ? ? * eq.1 ) : @xmath519 \;,\;\ ; e \equiv \sqrt{1-\ell^2 } .\ ] ] then @xmath520 where @xmath521 is expressed in terms of gauss hypergeometric function : @xmath522 @xmath523 \frac{\ell^2}{2 } \right\ } \left(1-\frac{\ell_z^2}{\ell^2}\right ) .\ ] ] motion in the hierarchical three - body problem is often derived from a doubly - averaged hamiltonian after expressing the equations of motion in jacobi coordinates and retaining only the lowest - order ( quadrupole ) term in the perturbation potential . the `` inner restricted problem '' @xcite assumes furthermore that the test mass orbits well inside the perturber mass . the averaged hamiltonian describing the test particle , with an appropriately chosen unit of time , is @xmath524\ ] ] ( merritt 2013 , equation 4.315 ) which may be obtained from equation [ eq_hamiltonian_approx ] by setting @xmath525 and eliminating unity in the first bracket of the first term ( equivalent to taking the limit @xmath526 , eliminating terms that do not contain @xmath125 and normalizing the unit of time to @xmath125 ) . equation ( [ eq_calhb ] ) then yields a value of @xmath527 for the parameter @xmath123 . as in the axisymmetric problem , motion in the lidov - kozai problem also exhibits two regimes : circulation in @xmath46 ( corresponding to tube orbits ) or libration about @xmath100 ( analogous to saucers ) , the latter appearing for @xmath528 . the equation of motion for @xmath78 ( [ eq_dcalrdtau ] ) is @xmath529 with the same relation between @xmath530 as in equation ( [ eq_rminmax ] ) : @xmath531 the case of circulation corresponds to @xmath532 , and libration to @xmath533 ; in the latter case the relation between minimum and maximum values of @xmath78 is the same as in equation ( [ eq_rminmax_saucer ] ) , from which it follows that the librating regime exists for @xmath534 . the separatrix between `` tubes '' and `` saucers '' is at @xmath535 and the fixed - point saucer has @xmath536 . for comparison , in the oblate axisymmetric potential considered throughout this paper , the first regime ( tube orbits ) has @xmath537 and the second ( saucers ) has @xmath538 . beyond the influence sphere , orbits similar to the saucers can still exist in axisymmetric potentials @xcite , but they are not describable in terms of osculating keplerian elements . typically such orbits are described as tube orbits that lie close to a resonance between the radial and vertical motions . to make the correspondence with our work more clear , we recast the fixed - point saucer orbit near a sbh in terms of the cartesian variables ( @xmath539 ) , i.e. cylindrical coordinates in the meridional plane . setting @xmath100 in equation ( a1 ) yields for the fixed - point orbit that generates the saucers @xmath540 where it is understood that @xmath541 and @xmath542 have their fixed - point values : @xmath543 equation ( [ eq_meridional_fp ] ) is a hyperbola in the ( @xmath160 ) plane , between the points @xmath544 the curve crosses the equatorial plane at @xmath545 , the semi - latus rectum . when the fixed - point saucer orbit first appears , at @xmath546 , it lies in the equatorial plane ( @xmath547 ) and has zero vertical thickness . for @xmath75 values smaller than this maximum , the trajectory ( [ eq_meridional_fp ] ) can be interpreted as a @xmath548 resonance between motions in the @xmath446 and @xmath1 directions . described in this way , saucer orbits near a sbh are seen to have very similar properties to orbits described by other authors in more general axisymmetric potentials . @xcite studied orbits in scale - free axisymmetric models with logarithmic potentials , @xmath549 and no central sbh . for models with density axis ratio @xmath550 , they found that saucers first appear at @xmath551 ; for smaller @xmath75 the fixed - point orbit ( which they called a `` reflected banana '' ) traces a path in the ( @xmath160 ) plane similar to equation ( [ eq_meridional_fp ] ) . they noted that motion near the fixed - point orbit is regular , i.e. non - chaotic . similar orbits were described by @xcite ( who called them `` pipe orbits '' ) and @xcite in surveys of orbits in other scale - free families of oblate models . here we present the local ( position - dependent ) diffusion coefficients appearing in equation ( [ eq_fplocal ] ) , expressed in the spherical coordinates @xmath552 and generalized velocities @xmath553 , @xmath554 , @xmath555 . we denote @xmath556 , @xmath557 , @xmath558 . @xmath559 these coefficients have been expressed in terms of velocity diffusion coefficients for @xmath145 via integrals of the distribution function @xmath560 describing the field stars ( of mass @xmath173 ) using the relative potential @xmath561 : @xmath562 where @xmath563 when making comparisons with the relaxation rates measured from @xmath5-body simulations we averaged the diffusion coefficients over the subspace @xmath564 : @xmath565 although we discuss the two - dimensional fokker - planck equation in the @xmath341 plane throughout the paper , it is more convenient to obtain the numerical solution using a different set of coordinates , for which we have implemented two variants : @xmath566 and @xmath567 , where @xmath568 the lines of constant @xmath569 are diagonal lines in the @xmath341 plane , parallel to the capture boundary in the tube ( @xmath570 ) region , and lines of constant @xmath571 or @xmath572 are also straight lines in that plane , designed in such a way that the capture boundary in the saucer region ( @xmath570 ) has @xmath573 or @xmath574 . this facilitates setting boundary conditions on these capture boundaries which are parallel to coordinate axes . we used both coordinate sets to cross - check the results . Abstract:

Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.

Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered . Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video . Paper: in this short introduction we would like to introduce the two players in the title , random matrix theory ( rmt ) and quantum chromodynamics ( qcd ) , on a superficial level . this gives a motivation why and where it will be beneficial to relate these two seemingly unrelated theories , and what the reader may expect to learn from these notes . let us begin with qcd , the theory of the strong interactions . it is part of the standard model of elementary particles that also describes the weak and electromagnetic interactions among all elementary particles . the latter two interactions will however not play any role here . the particle content of qcd are the @xmath0 quarks with masses @xmath1 , @xmath2 , and the gluons . in nature @xmath3 flavours have been observed named up , down , strange , charm , top and bottom quark . in the following we will keep @xmath0 as a free parameter , and often consider only the lightest up and down quark ( @xmath4 ) as they constitute the most common particles as proton ( p ) , neutron ( n ) and pions ( @xmath5 ) . the quarks interact through the gluons , the carriers of force , with a coupling constant @xmath6 . both come in 3 colours and the interaction is described through a field strength and covariant derivative carrying an @xmath7 lie group structure . qcd is a strongly interacting , relativistic quantum field theory ( qft ) which is very difficult . fortunately we will only need to know a few features and some of its global symmetries that will be described in section [ symm ] . for a standard textbook on perturbative qcd we refer for example to @xcite . roughly speaking qcd has two different phases that are schematically depicted in figure [ fig : phasediag ] . they are characterised by an order parameter , the chiral condensate @xmath8 . at high energies corresponding to high temperatures t , @xmath9 and quarks and gluons form a plasma , that has been observed in collision experiments e.g. at the relativistic heavy ion collider rhic in brookhaven . this phase also existed in the early universe , with the cooling down happening close to the temperature axis at low baryon density parametrised by @xmath10 . in these situations as well as in single particle collisions produced at collider experiments a perturbative expansion in powers of the coupling @xmath6 typically applies , as described e.g. in @xcite . the second phase with @xmath11 at low temperature and density is the one in which we live . here quarks condense into colourless objects , that is into baryons made of 3 quarks of different colour adding up to white ( like p or n ) , or mesons made of a quark and an anti - quark with its anti - colour ( like the @xmath12 s ) . gluons are also confined to these objects , and a proof of confinement of quarks and gluons from qcd is still considered to be an open millennium problem . in qcd it happens that confinement goes along with the spontaneous breaking of chiral symmetry - hence the name of @xmath8 . this global symmetry will be described in detail later , and eventually lead us to a rmt description . ( 12.2,5.5 ) ( 1.0,0.3)(1,0)8 ( 9.2,0.2)@xmath10 ( 1.0,0.3)(0,1)5 ( 0.1,5.1)@xmath13 ( 0.1,4.3)@xmath14 ( 7.1,4.0)@xmath9 ( 1.0,-0.1)@xmath15 ( 2.9,1.8)@xmath11 ( 3.9,4.25)@xmath16 ( 8.0,-0.1)@xmath17 ( 1.0,4.4)(4.7,4.3)(4.0,4.3 ) ( 4.0,4.3)(7.0,4.2)(8.0,0.3 ) in the phase with @xmath11 perturbation theory breaks down and one has to apply other methods . if one wants to continue to work with first principles and the qcd action , one possibility is to study qcd on a finite space - time lattice of volume @xmath18 and lattice spacing @xmath19 , equipped with a euclidean metric . the numerical solution of this theory nowadays reproduces the masses of particles that are composed of elementary ones to a very high precision , as testified in the particle data booklet @xcite . to that aim two limits have to be made , the continuum limit sending @xmath20 and the thermodynamical limit sending @xmath21 . for a standard textbook on lattice qcd we refer to @xcite . a second possibility is to approximate qcd in the confined phase by effective theories , that describe for example only the low energy excitation . one of these is chiral perturbation theory ( chpt ) , see @xcite for a review , that describes the low momentum modes that appear after the spontaneous breaking of chiral symmetry , the so - called goldstone bosons . another such theory is rmt . it should be clear by now that rmt will not solve qcd ( nor chpt ) , in the continuum or on the lattice . however , it will describe certain aspects in an analytic fashion , namely the spectral properties of the small eigenvalues of the qcd dirac operator @xmath22 . in a finite volume the density of eigenvalues of @xmath22 satisfies the banks - casher relation @xcite @xmath23 which relates it to the described setup . in particular rmt will predict the detailed dependence on the parameters @xmath1 , @xmath10 , @xmath19 , and @xmath18 after being appropriately rescaled , as well as on a the zero - eigenvalues of @xmath22 which relate to a topological index @xmath24 . and most remarkably these predictions have been verified in comparison to lattice qcd by many groups . we will not repeat these findings here and refer to the literature at the end of each section . the idea to apply rmt to qcd goes back to the seminal works @xcite that started from the simplest case with @xmath25 which is called quenched approximation , at @xmath26 . the field has since developed enormously , leading to the detailed analytical knowledge that we will describe . there exist a number of excellent reviews already , @xcite , notably the lecture notes from the les houches session in 2004 by j. verbaarschot @xcite . this brings me to the main goals of these lecture notes , to be addressed in the order of the subsequent sections . what can we predict from rmt that can be compared to lattice qcd ? in section [ opdirac ] we will start with the solution of the corresponding rmt using the theory of orthogonal polynomials . this section is rather mathematical and contains no further physics input . the second question , what the limit is , in which qcd reduces to rmt , is addressed in section [ symm ] . here the global symmetries of qcd are explained , leading to chpt and eventually to a rmt description . the more physics inclined reader may jump to this section first . one of my personal motivations why to add another review on this topic is answered in section [ recent ] where the development in the last 10 years is reviewed , including some mathematical aspects . this covers the dependence on finite lattice spacing @xmath19 and on chemical potential @xmath10 , for an earlier review on the latter see @xcite . let us move to rmt , where i assume that the reader has already some working knowledge . rmt is a much older topic , beginning in the late 1920 s with wishart in mathematical statistics and in the late 1950 s with wigner and dyson in nuclear physics . the number of its applications is huge and still increasing , and we refer to @xcite for applications to quantum physics and to @xcite for a recent compilation containing physics ( including qcd in chapter 32 ) , mathematics and more . in these lecture notes we will focus only on the theory of orthogonal polynomials . for the standard gaussian ensembles they are covered in the last edition of mehta s classical book @xcite , for more recent monographs see @xcite . the symmetry class we will be interested in for the application to qcd is the chiral gaussian unitary ensemble ( chgue ) , which is also known as wishart or laguerre unitary ensemble , and extensions thereof . in the simplest case of @xmath25 and when all the abovementioned parameters from qcd are absent it is defined by the probability space of complex @xmath27 matrices @xmath28 . all its matrix elements are independent and share the same complex normal distribution . the mean density @xmath29 of the positive eigenvalues of @xmath30 , where @xmath31 denotes the hermitian conjugate , is well known in the limit @xmath32 . after an appropriate rescaling it is given by the marchenko - pastur law depicted in figure [ fig : mpdensity ] , cf . the lectures by bouchaud where this was derived . ( 12.2,4.5 ) which is the limiting global spectral density of the chgue . we also indicate the locations where different local statistics applies : they are given by i ) the bessel - kernel close to the hard edge , ii ) the sine - kernel in the bulk and iii ) the airy - kernel at the soft edge . [ fig : mpdensity],title="fig:",width=264 ] ( 0.2,-0.2)@xmath33 ( -7.8,4.0)@xmath29 ( -1.9,-0.2)iii ) ( -6.6,-0.2)i ) ( -4.5,-0.2)ii ) the same law is obtained when taking real or quaternion valued matrix elements , constituting the chiral gaussian orthogonal and symplectic ensemble ( chgoe and chgse ) , respectively . however , the local statistics of the 3 ensembles differs , and depends on the location in the spectrum we consider . for finite @xmath34 the eigenvalue statistics follows a determinantal ( chgue ) or pfaffian point process ( chgoe , chgse ) , and the limiting kernels in the various locations of the spectrum shown in figure [ fig : mpdensity ] are given in terms of bessel , sine or airy functions . in view of the relation ( [ bcrel ] ) we will be interested in the local statistics for the chgue at the origin also called hard edge . the other two symmetry classes at the hard edge will also find applications in qft as pointed out in @xcite , cf . @xcite , but will not be discussed here . in the limit where rmt applies the eigenvalues @xmath35 of the qcd dirac operator @xmath22 will be given by @xmath36 and thus come in pairs , where @xmath37 are the eigenvalues of @xmath30 ( the positive part @xmath38 are the singular values of @xmath28 ) . after this change of variables the marchenko - pastur law becomes a semi - circle , which is why the global density of @xmath22 at the origin will become constant ( and not divergent as in figure [ fig : mpdensity ] ) . for finite @xmath34 the chgue can be solved in terms of the classical laguerre polynomials . it will be the content of sections [ opdirac ] and [ recent ] to include more structure from qcd into this rmt , while maintaining its exact solvability . in this section we go directly to the rmt of qcd in an eigenvalue representation that generalises the chgue , by including the mass terms of @xmath0 quark flavours . in subsection [ defs ] we briefly recall the orthogonal polynomial ( op ) formalism and define the quantities of our interest . we then attack the mathematical problem of computing these by deriving properties of op with a general weight , in particular including averages of characteristic polynomials in subsection [ genweight ] . this allows us to determine all quantities explicitly in terms of standard laguerre polynomials in subsection [ alllaguerre ] , which facilitates the large-@xmath34 limit to be taken in subsection [ lim ] . we begin by stating the rmt that we want to solve in its eigenvalue representation , defined by the following partition function @xmath39 it gives the normalisation constant of the unnormalised joint probability density function ( jpdf ) @xmath40 of all eigenvalues . here we have included the dependence on the following parameters to be related to qcd later : @xmath41 called the topological index taking fixed values , the masses @xmath42 , @xmath43 , with @xmath0 counting the number of inserted characteristic polynomials . in the quenched theory with @xmath25 their product is absent . these parameters are all collected in the weight function @xmath44 and finally we also have introduced the vandermonde determinant @xmath45=\prod_{1\leq i < j\leq n}(x_j - x_i)\ . \label{delta}\ ] ] it depends on the set of all eigenvalues @xmath46 . the partition function eq . ( [ partitionfunct ] ) is relevant for qcd for @xmath47 , representing the chgue in the presence of @xmath0 characteristic polynomials ( mass terms ) . for completeness and in order to state some open problems later we have also introduced the chgoe and chgse with @xmath48 and 4 , respectively . all three rmt are also called wishart - laguerre ensembles and can be written in matrix representation , @xmath49\prod_{f=1}^{n_f}\det \left [ \begin{array}{cc } m_f 1_n&i w\\ iw^\dag & m_f 1_{n+\nu}\\ \end{array } \right ] \exp[-\mbox{tr}(ww^\dag)]\ . \label{matrixrep}\ ] ] here @xmath28 is an @xmath50 matrix taking values @xmath51 for @xmath52 respectively , and @xmath53 is its hermitian conjugate . the integration @xmath54 $ ] is over the flat lebesgue measure of all independent matrix elements . the identity matrices in front of the scalar mass variables @xmath55 of dimensions @xmath34 and @xmath56 are denoted by @xmath57 and @xmath58 , respectively . here we see that @xmath24 counts the number of zero eigenvalues of the wishart matrix @xmath59 , and the @xmath37 , @xmath60 denote its non - zero positive eigenvalues we always have an even number @xmath61 of doubly degenerate masses in eq . ( [ partitionfunct ] ) . we will come back to this at the end of subsection [ alllaguerre ] . ] . the change of variables from matrix elements to eigenvalues leads to the vandermonde determinant to the power @xmath52 times the @xmath24-dependent part as the jacobian , and we refer to standard text books on rmt for the derivation @xcite . in the lectures of j .- bouchaud these ensembles were discussed for @xmath25 , in particular when @xmath24 is of the order of @xmath34 . this matrix representation eq . ( [ matrixrep ] ) will play an important role later in section [ symm ] when relating the rmt to qcd based on symmetries . in the following we will mainly focus on the chgue with @xmath47 which is the rmt relevant for qcd . the values @xmath48 and 4 apply to other qfts and are very briefly discussed at the end of subsection [ alllaguerre ] . what are the quantities we would like to calculate as functions of the masses @xmath55 and @xmath24 , apart from the normalising partition function ? the jpdf represents a determinantal ( or pfaffian ) point process introduced in the lectures by a. borodin . therefore we can determine all @xmath62-point eigenvalue density correlations defined for all @xmath63 as @xmath64\ , \ \ \mbox{for } \ \ \beta=2\ . \label{rkb2}\end{aligned}\ ] ] in the second line valid for @xmath47 only they can be expressed in terms of the determinant of the kernel @xmath65 that does not contain the weights in our convention . it contains op with respect to the weight eq . ( [ weight ] ) , @xmath66 for @xmath67 similar expressions exist in terms of pfaffian determinants of a matrix kernel of op with respect to a skew symmetric inner product replacing eq . ( [ op ] ) . these are called skew op and we refer to @xcite for details . we choose the op in eq . ( [ op ] ) to be monic , @xmath68 , with squared norms @xmath69 . in particular eq . ( [ rk ] ) leads to the spectral density @xmath70 ( normalised to @xmath34 ) and to the determinantal expression for the jpdf , @xmath71 . two further quantities can be defined that are of our interest . the @xmath62-th gap probability defined for all @xmath63 reads @xmath72 it is the probability that @xmath62 eigenvalues are in @xmath73 $ ] and @xmath74 in @xmath75 . for example @xmath76 gives the gap probability that the interval @xmath73 $ ] is empty . if we order the eigenvalues @xmath77 the @xmath62-th eigenvalue distribution defined as @xmath78 gives the probability to find the @xmath62-th eigenvalue at @xmath79 , @xmath80 eigenvalues in @xmath73 $ ] and @xmath74 in @xmath75 . these individual eigenvalue distributions are normalised @xmath81 , as can be easily checked ( see e.g. the appendix of @xcite ) . we will be mostly interested in the example of the distribution of the smallest non - zero eigenvalue , @xmath82 . equations ( [ gapk ] ) and ( [ pk ] ) are not independent , in fact the latter follow by differentiation : @xmath83 which can be solved for @xmath84 as follows : @xmath85 the gap probabilities can also be expressed in terms of the kernel @xmath86 as a fredholm determinant , cf . the lectures by a. borodin and eqs . ( [ e0andreiev ] ) and ( [ expand ] ) , but we will use a different route to compute them explicitly . our goal is now to determine all the quantities that we have introduced in this subsection , including the partition function . for @xmath25 this would be an easy task as the polynomials orthogonal with respect to @xmath87 $ ] are the well known laguerre polynomials . it turns out that also for @xmath88 we can express all quantities in terms of laguerre polynomials , including the dependence on the parameter @xmath55 and @xmath24 that we are after . this will be the goal of the following 2 subsections . the first part of this subsection is standard material about op on the real line and can be found in any standard reference , e.g. in @xcite including also op in the complex plane needed later . for the second part with weights containing characteristic polynomials we refer to @xcite for more details . let us consider a general measurable weight function on the positive real half line with the condition that all moments exist , @xmath89 . the monic polynomials @xmath90 orthogonal with respect to @xmath91 can then be recursively constructed using gram - schmidt , expressing them as the ratio of two determinants : @xmath92\right)^{-1},\ ] ] see @xcite for details . it obviously satisfies @xmath93 . these polynomials obey a three - step recurrence relation , @xmath94 which can be see as follows . with the @xmath90 forming a complete set we can expand @xmath95 using that in the last integral @xmath96 is a polynomial of degree @xmath97 and the orthogonality eq . ( [ op ] ) it follows that @xmath98 for @xmath99 and @xmath100 . for the orthonormal polynomials @xmath101 the recursion eq . ( [ recurrence ] ) becomes more symmetric , @xmath102 and we obtain the christoffel - darboux formula for the kernel @xmath103 this simply follows by multiplying the sum by @xmath104 with @xmath105 , using the recursion and the fact that this is a telescopic sum . from lhpital s rule for the kernel at equal arguments we see that in the asymptotic limit @xmath32 we only need to evaluate the asymptotic of @xmath106 , @xmath107 , their derivatives , and the ratio of norms @xmath108 to determine the spectral density : @xmath109 let us give two examples . for the gue with weight @xmath110 $ ] on @xmath111 instead of @xmath112 we have @xmath113 the probabilist s hermite polynomials . second , for the laguerre weight @xmath87 $ ] , eq . ( [ weight ] ) with @xmath25 on @xmath112 , the monic op are given by the appropriately rescaled generalised laguerre polynomials @xmath114 : @xmath115 where @xmath24 can also be real here . the asymptotic analysis of the kernel ( and density ) can now be made , and we will come back to this in subsection [ lim ] . in the following we will express the partition function , corresponding ops , kernel and gap probability @xmath76 in terms of expectation values of characteristic polynomials in a first step , and then reduce them to determinants of laguerre polynomials in a second step . in order to prepare this the following exercise is very useful . consider the 2 vandermode determinants eq . ( [ delta ] ) inside the partition function ( [ partitionfunct ] ) for @xmath47 . by adding columns inside the vandermonde determinant we do not change its value . starting with the last column of highest degree we can thus express @xmath116 in terms of arbitrary monic polynomials @xmath117 : @xmath118 \ . \label{delta - id1}\ ] ] choosing those monic polynomials @xmath119 that precisely satisfy the orthogonality relation ( [ op ] ) we obtain for the partition function : @xmath120\right)^2\nonumber\\ & = & \sum_{\sigma,\sigma^\prime\in s_n}(-1)^{\sigma+\sigma^\prime } \prod_{l=1}^n\int_0^\infty dx_l w(x_l){p}_{\sigma(l)-1}(x_l){p}_{\sigma^\prime(l)-1}(x_l ) \ = \ \label{znorm}\end{aligned}\ ] ] in the second step we have laplace expanded both determinants into sums over permutations @xmath121 and used the orthogonality ( [ op ] ) . the computation of the partition function thus amounts to determine the squared norms of the ops with respect to the weight eq . ( [ weight ] ) . let us define the expectation value of an operator @xmath122 that only depends on the set of eigenvalues @xmath123 : @xmath124 then the following identity holds for the monic ops : @xmath125 it is given by the expectation value of a characteristic polynomial with respect to @xmath126 eigenvalues for an arbitrary degree , where @xmath127 . it can also be expressed in terms of matrices of size @xmath126 , choosing @xmath128 $ ] . this relation is known as the heine formula , dating back to the 19th century . the proof uses the simple identity for the vandermonde determinant , @xmath129 \ . \label{delta - id2}\ ] ] using this identity in the expectation value we arrive at the same situation as in eq . ( [ znorm ] ) , with one larger determinant : @xmath130 here the orthogonality of the polynomials enforces @xmath131 , and the remaining norms cancel due to eq . ( [ znorm ] ) . as a check also the leading coefficient of eq . ( [ opid ] ) can be compared , taking the asymptotic limit @xmath132 which leads to @xmath133 on both sides . note that eq . ( [ opid ] ) provides an @xmath126-fold integral representation of the @xmath134 for an arbitrary weight function . compared to the known single integral representation , e.g. for the hermite polynomials in the example in eq . ( [ hermite ] ) , we thus have the following duality relation @xmath135\ . % = \langle\det[x - ih]^n\rangle_1 .\ ] ] here we take a single average over @xmath136 copies of characteristic polynomials . the existence of such relations between 1- and @xmath136-fold averages of characteristic polynomials are known only for gaussian weights . they can also be derived using the supersymmetric method as reviewed in chapter 7 of @xcite by thomas guhr , see also @xcite for further dualities using op techniques . in the next step we will express the kernel itself as an expectation value of two characteristic polynomials , following the work of p. zinn - justin @xcite . namely it holds that @xmath137 the proof uses the same idea as before , now including each product into a different vandermonde determinant of size @xmath138 . we have @xmath139 compared to eq . ( [ proofpn ] ) the orthogonality only implies @xmath140 , and its value can still run over all possible values from 1 to @xmath138 . in the last line we give the expression for the kernel @xmath141 in terms of the christoffel - darboux formula ( [ cd ] ) , using monic polynomials instead . once again the leading coefficients of left and right hand side can be see to agree @xmath142 in the limit @xmath143 . an immediate question arises : what is the expectation value for more than two products of characteristic polynomials ? for that purpose let us introduce some more notation following baik , deift and strahov @xcite , to where we refer for more details . denote by @xmath144}(x)$ ] the op with respect to weight @xmath145}(x)=(\prod_{j=1}^l(y_j - x))w(x)$ ] for @xmath146 , with @xmath147}(x)=p_n(x)$ ] . the following relation holds which is called christoffel formula : @xmath148}(x)=\frac{1}{(x - y_1)\cdots(x - y_l ) } \left| \begin{array}{lll } p_n(y_1)&\ldots&p_{n+l}(y_1)\\ \vdots & & \vdots\\ p_n(y_l)&\ldots&p_{n+l}(y_l)\\ p_n(x)&\ldots&p_{n+l}(x)\\ \end{array } \right|\left(\det_{1\leq i , j\leq l}[p_{n+j-1}(y_i)]\right)^{-1}. \label{christoffel}\ ] ] as explained in @xcite this can be seen as follows . it is clear that the determinant in the middle , which we call @xmath149}(x)$ ] , is a polynomial of degree @xmath150 in @xmath33 . it has zeros at @xmath151 , and thus @xmath149}(x)/(x - y_1)\cdots(x - y_l)$ ] is a polynomial of degree @xmath136 in @xmath33 . thus we have that @xmath152}(x)}{(x - y_1)\cdots(x - y_l)}w^{[l]}(x)=0\ , \mbox{for}\ \ j=0,1,\ldots , n-1\ , \ ] ] due to @xmath153 being op with respect to weight @xmath91 , after cancelling the factors from @xmath145}(x)$ ] . the last factor in eq . ( [ christoffel ] ) ensures that @xmath144}(x)$ ] is monic , as can bee seen from taking the limit @xmath132 . the repeated product of the christoffel formula ( [ christoffel ] ) leads to the following theorem ( see theorem 2.3 @xcite ) for the average of products of @xmath97 characteristic polynomials with @xmath146 , which is due to brzin and hikami @xcite : @xmath154 = \prod_{j=0}^lp_n^{[j]}(y_{j+1})= \left\langle \prod_{i=1}^{n}\left(\prod_{j=1}^{l+1}(y_j - x_i ) \right)\right\rangle_n . \label{prodchar}\ ] ] for the last equality we have used eq . ( [ opid ] ) that leads to @xmath155}(y_{j+1})=\frac{\left\langle \prod_{i=1}^{n}\left((y_{j+1}-x_i)\prod_{p=1}^{j}(y_p - x_i ) \right)\right\rangle_n}{\left\langle \prod_{i=1}^{n}\left(\prod_{p=1}^{j}(y_p - x_i ) \right)\right\rangle_n}. \label{pnvev}\ ] ] in the product almost all factors cancel out . the case for a single characteristic polynomial with @xmath156 in eq . ( [ prodchar ] ) was already stated eq . ( [ opid ] ) . in @xcite in theorem 3.2 a further identity was derived for the expectation value of the product of an even number of characteristic polynomials , expressing it through a determinant of kernels divided by two vandermonde determinants , @xmath157= \left\langle \prod_{i=1}^{n}\left(\prod_{j=1}^{k}(\lambda_j - x_i ) ( \mu_j - x_i)\right)\right\rangle_n . \label{prod2char}\ ] ] the simplest example for this relation was derived in eq . ( [ kernelid ] ) . in @xcite this set of identities was further generalised , expressing the expectation value of arbitrary products of characteristic polynomials by a determinant containing both kernels and polynomials divided by two vandermonde determinants in many different and equivalent ways , cf . ( [ cprodchar ] ) . the simplest example with 3 products reads @xcite @xmath158 let us mention that in @xcite also expectation values of ratios of characteristic polynomials were determined . they can be expressed in terms of the cauchy transforms @xmath159 of the monic polynomials @xmath90 , @xmath160 as well as through mixed chistoffel - darboux kernels containing both cauchy transforms and polynomials . the simplest example is given by @xmath161 the fact that both sides agree @xmath162 for @xmath132 can be easily seen from the definition ( [ cauchy ] ) , expanding the geometric series and using the orthogonality of the polynomial @xmath163 to monic powers less than @xmath62 . a second particularly important example is the expectation value of the ratio of two characteristic polynomials , due to the following relation to the resolvent or stieltjes transform @xmath164 : @xmath165 the resolvent can be used to obtain the spectral density through the following relation @xmath166 \ . \label{inversion}\ ] ] there are many examples where the op technique is not available , but where the expectation value of ratios of characteristic polynomials can be found by other means , e.g. by using supersymmetry , replicas or loop equations . this then leads to an alternative way to determine the spectral density , or higher @xmath62-point correlation functions , by taking the average over @xmath62 resolvents and then taking the imaginary parts with respect to each of the @xmath62 arguments . we refer to chapters 7 , 8 and 16 in @xcite for further details and references . using the results from the previous subsection we are now ready to express the partition function , ops , kernel , and consequently all @xmath62-point correlation functions with @xmath0 characteristic polynomials , as well as the corresponding gap probabilities through expectation values of characteristic polynomials with respect to the quenched weight @xmath87 $ ] with @xmath25 . because the ops of this quenched weight are laguerre polynomials , everything will be finally expressed through these , which yields explicit and exact expressions for any finite @xmath34 and @xmath0 . in the next subsection [ lim ] will use them to take the large-@xmath34 limit based on the known asymptotic of the laguerre polynomials . we shall adopt the notation from the previous section , labelling all the above listed quantities by superscript @xmath167 $ ] compared to the quenched weight without superscript . we have for the partition function eq . ( [ partitionfunct ] ) with masses @xmath168}(\{m\})&=&\left(\prod_{j=1}^n\int_0^\infty dx_j\ x_j^\nu e^{-x_j}\prod_{f=1}^{n_f}(x_j+m_f^2)\right)\delta_n(\{x\})^2 = z_n\left\langle \prod_{j=1}^n\prod_{f=1}^{n_f}(x_j+m_f^2)\right\rangle_n \nonumber\\ & = & n!(-1)^{n_f(n+(n_f-1)/2)}\prod_{j=1}^{n}\gamma(j+\nu)\prod_{j=1}^{n+n_f}\gamma(j)\ \frac{\det_{1\leq i , j \leq n_f } \left[l_{n+j-1}^\nu(-m_i^2)\right]}{\delta_{n_f}(\{-m^2\})}. \label{zmassive}\end{aligned}\ ] ] this result simply follows from choosing @xmath169 in eq . ( [ prodchar ] ) , together with eqs . ( [ znorm ] ) and ( [ laguerre ] ) for the quenched polynomials . it is clear that if some of the masses become zero , say @xmath126 out of @xmath0 , from looking at eq . ( [ partitionfunct ] ) for @xmath47 without further calculation this leads to the shift @xmath170 in the remaining determinant of size @xmath171 . this property is called flavour - topology duality . in the case when all masses are degenerate , @xmath172 , lhopital s rule eventually leads to @xcite @xmath173}(m)=\frac{(-1)^{nn_f}}{\prod_{l=0}^{n_h-1}l!}\det_{0\leq i , j \leq n_f-1 } \left[(-1)^{n+i}(n+i)!(l_{n+i}^\nu(-m^2))^{(j)}\right]\ , \label{zmassivedeg}\ ] ] where the superscript @xmath174 denotes the @xmath175-th derivative with respect to the argument @xmath176 . the unquenched op @xmath177}(x)$ ] follow directly from eq . ( [ pnvev ] ) at @xmath178 , with @xmath179 . for example using eq . ( [ laguerre ] ) the op for the weight @xmath180}(x)=(x+m^2)x^\nu\exp[-x]$ ] the corresponding op read @xcite @xmath181}(x)=\frac{h_nk_{n+1}(x ,- m^2)}{p_n(-m^2)}=\frac{(-1)^{n+1}(n+1)!}{(x+m^2)l_n^\nu(-m^2)}(l_{n+1}^\nu(x)l_{n}^\nu(-m^2)-l_{n+1}^\nu(-m^2)l_{n}^\nu(x))\ . \label{pmassive}\ ] ] however , it is much simpler to directly use the kernel from eq . ( [ kernelid ] ) , rather than expressing it through the polynomials @xmath182}(x)$ ] using the christoffel - darboux identity ( [ cd ] ) . indeed the kernel is given by eq . ( [ kernelid ] ) as @xmath183}(x , y)&= & \frac{1}{h_{n-1}^{[n_f]}}\left\langle \prod_{i=1}^{n-1}(x - x_i)(y - x_i ) \right\rangle_{n-1}^{[n_f ] } = \frac{1}{h_{n-1}}\frac { \left\langle\prod_{i=1}^{n-1}\left((x - x_i)(y - x_i)\prod_{f=1}^{n_f}(m_f^2+x_i)\right ) \right\rangle_{n-1 } } { \left\langle\prod_{i=1}^{n}\prod_{f=1}^{n_f}(m_f^2+x_i ) \right\rangle_{n } } \nonumber\\ & = & \frac{(-1)^{n_f-1}(n+n_f)!}{\gamma(n+\nu)(y - x)\prod_{f=1}^{n_f}(y+m_f^2)(x+m_f^2 ) } \frac { \left| \begin{array}{lll } l_{n-1}^\nu(-m_1 ^ 2)&\ldots&l_{n+n_f}^\nu(-m_1 ^ 2)\\ \vdots & & \vdots\\ l_{n-1}^\nu(-m_{n_f}^2)&\ldots&l_{n+n_f}^\nu(-m_{n_f}^2)\\ l_{n-1}^\nu(x)&\ldots&l_{n+n_f}^\nu(x)\\ l_{n-1}^\nu(y)&\ldots&l_{n+n_f}^\nu(y)\\ \end{array } \right| } { \det_{1\leq f , g\leq n_f}[l_{n+g-1}^\nu(-m_f^2)]}. \label{kernelmassive}\end{aligned}\ ] ] in the first step after inserting eq . ( [ kernelid ] ) we have included the mass dependent norm @xmath184}$ ] into the massive partition function in the denominator . it is given by the product of its norms times @xmath185 . thus we have increasing the average from @xmath186 to @xmath34 . in the final result in the second line we have already taken out all signs and factorials from the two determinants and cancelled them partly . also the ratio of the two vandermonde determinants , one of which containing the arguments @xmath33 and @xmath187 has been simplified using the definition ( [ delta ] ) . the kernel eq . ( [ kernelmassive ] ) determines all @xmath62-point eigenvalue correlation functions from eq . ( [ rkb2 ] ) including their mass dependence . in particular for @xmath188 we obtain the spectral density with @xmath0 masses : @xmath189}(x)=x^\nu\exp[-x]\prod_{f=1}^{n_f}(x+m_f^2)\ k_n^{[n_f]}(x , x)\ , \label{r1massive}\ ] ] after applying lhpital s rule once . this leads to @xmath190 in the last row in the numerator . note that the product from the weight in front of the kernel cancels part of its denominator . let us now turn to the gap probabilities and distribution of smallest eigenvalues , starting with @xmath76 from eq . ( [ gapk ] ) . the following andriev integral identity ( cf . borodin s lectures ) can be used to get a first expression : @xmath191\det_{1\leq i , j \leq n}[\psi_i(x_j ) ] = n!\det_{1\leq i , j \leq n}\left[\int dx\phi_i(x)\psi_j(x)\right]\ . \label{andreiev}\ ] ] the only condition to hold is that all integrals of the functions @xmath192 and @xmath193 exist . the proof merely uses the laplace expansion of the left hand side : @xmath194 and integration over common arguments of @xmath195 and @xmath196 . this implies @xmath197 , which is yet another permutation . following eq . ( [ gapk ] ) we can thus write @xmath198}(s ) = \frac{1}{n!%\prod_{l=0}^{n-1}h_l } \prod_{p=1}^n\int_s^\infty dx_p \det_{1\leq i , j \leq n}\left[\sqrt{w^{[n_f]}(x_j)}\hat{p}_{i-1}^{[n_f]}(x_j)\right]^2 = \det_{1\leq i , j \leq n}\left[\delta_{ij}-\int_0^s dx w^{[n_f]}(x)\hat{p}_{i-1}^{[n_f]}(x)\hat{p}_{j-1}^{[n_f]}(x)\right]\ ! , \label{e0andreiev}\ ] ] which can be interpreted as a fredholm determinant . in the first step we have replaced the vandermonde determinants by determinants of monic polynomials , and then included the square root of the weight functions and of the norms stemming from the normalising partition function into the determinants , in order to make the polynomials orthonormal , @xmath199}(x_j)$ ] . in the next step we have used the andrief formula and the orthonormality on @xmath200 . knowing both the monic polynomials from eq . ( [ pnvev ] ) and their squared norms from @xmath201}=z_j^{[n_f]}/(j z_{j-1}^{[n_f]})$ ] in terms of expectation values of laguerre polynomials , eq . ( [ e0andreiev ] ) is a valid expression for the gap @xmath76 . however , we will use a more direct expression to be derived below . as a further remark we note that replacing @xmath202 in the first equality in ( [ e0andreiev ] ) we obtain an equivalent expansion of the fredholm determinant in the second equation : @xmath198}(s ) = 1+\sum_{k=1}^n\frac{(-1)^k}{k!}\int_0^s dx_1\ldots \int_0^s dx_k r_k^{[n_f]}(x_1\ldots , x_k ) . \label{expand}\ ] ] in order to express the gap probability directly as an expectation value let us go back to its definition ( [ gapk ] ) , which we state for general @xmath63 : @xmath203}(s)&=&\frac{1}{z_n^{(\beta , n_f,\nu)}}\left(\prod_{j=1}^n\int_s^\infty dx_j\ x_j^{\frac\beta2(\nu+1)-1}e^{-x_j}\prod_{f=1}^{n_f}(x_j+m_f^2)\right ) |\delta_n(\{x\})|^\beta\nonumber\\ & = & \frac{e^{-n s}}{z_n^{(\beta , n_f,\nu)}}\left(\prod_{j=1}^n\int_0^\infty dy_j\ y_j^0 ( y_j+s)^{\frac\beta2(\nu+1)-1}e^{-y_j}\prod_{f=1}^{n_f}(y_j+s+m_f^2)\right ) |\delta_n(\{y\})|^\beta . \label{gap - shift}\end{aligned}\ ] ] here we have shifted all integration domains , substituting @xmath204 , @xmath60 . the shift can be simply worked out , in particular it leaves the vandermonde determinant invariant , as a consequence the numerator is again given by a partition of @xmath205 masses with values @xmath206 for the first @xmath0 , and @xmath207 for the remaining ones , with an effective topological charge @xmath208 parameter satisfying @xmath209 . this idea has been used in several papers @xcite to give closed form expressions as an alternative to the fredholm determinant above . let us first consider @xmath47 , with @xmath210 . consequently eq . ( [ gap - shift ] ) can be written as @xmath211}(s)= e^{-ns } \frac{z_n^{(2,n_f+\nu,0)}}{z_n^{(2,n_f,\nu ) } } \left\langle \prod_{i=1}^n\left ( ( s+y_j)^\nu\prod_{f=1}^{n_f}(m_f^2+s+y_j)\right)\right\rangle_{n,\,\nu_{ef\!f}=0}. \label{gap - vevb2}\ ] ] the simplest examples with @xmath25 and @xmath212 thus read @xmath213 in the second line we have replaced the expectation value of a single characteristic polynomial eq . ( [ opid ] ) by the laguerre polynomial eq . ( [ laguerre ] ) and fixed the normalisation by the requirement @xmath214 . the quenched gap probability ( @xmath25 ) with arbitrary @xmath24 can be computed from the massive partition functions eq . ( [ zmassivedeg ] ) at complete degeneracy . the smallest eigenvalue distribution @xmath82 easily follows for the examples we have just given by differentiation of the gap probability , see eq . ( [ p1 ] ) . for higher gap probabilities and for computing @xmath84 directly the same trick from eq . ( [ gap - shift ] ) can be used . first consider only the integrals @xmath215 in the definitions ( [ gapk ] ) and ( [ pk ] ) . then do the shift @xmath204 , and perform the remaining integrals @xmath216 over the obtained expectation value of characteristic polynomials in the end . we refer to @xcite for more details . let us now briefly comment on @xmath67 , mainly because of recent developments and open questions in these symmetry classes . we begin with @xmath48 . here the effective topological charge is @xmath217 to satisfy @xmath218 in eq . ( [ gap - shift ] ) . the additional mass terms originating from the shift by @xmath219 in eq . ( [ gap - shift ] ) appear with multiplicity @xmath220 : @xmath221}(s)= e^{-ns } \frac{z_n^{(1,n_f+(\nu-1)/2,1)}}{z_n^{(1,n_f,\nu ) } } \left\langle \prod_{i=1}^n\left ( ( s+y_j)^{(\nu-1)/2}\prod_{f=1}^{n_f}(m_f^2+s+y_j)\right)\right\rangle_{n,\,\nu_{ef\!f}=1}. \label{gap - vevb1}\ ] ] that is for @xmath222 odd , @xmath223 we have @xmath224 extra masses @xmath207 compared to the @xmath0 shifted masses . here the simplest case is @xmath225 with @xmath25 , for which we obtain @xmath226 for arbitrary @xmath34 . it agrees with the result for @xmath47 at @xmath227 , eq . ( [ e0nu0 ] ) . for general odd @xmath24 the gap probabilities have been computed and we refer to @xcite for results . however , for @xmath228 even we obtain a half integer number @xmath229 of additional mass terms . this leads to the question of calculating expectation values including products of square roots of characteristic polynomials in eq . ( [ gap - vevb1 ] ) . in @xcite the expectation values needed to determine @xmath76 for arbitrary even @xmath228 and general @xmath0 have been computed for the chgoe , answering at least the question for the gap probability . the cases @xmath227 @xcite and @xmath230 @xcite were previously known from different considerations . namely in @xcite a recursive construction was made for the smallest eigenvalue for @xmath48 valid for all @xmath24 . however , in this approach the pfaffian structure appearing for @xmath231 is not at all apparent . independently in @xcite the question about expectation values of square roots of determinants has been asked and answered for special cases for the goe in the context of scattering in chaotic quantum systems . it is an open problem if the most general expectation value of such products ( or ratios ) of square roots has a determinantal or pfaffian structure as in eq . ( [ prodchar ] ) . let us turn to @xmath232 . the effective topological charge we obtain is @xmath233 to satisfy @xmath234 in eq . ( [ gap - shift ] ) . the fact that it is not integer does not pose a problem as the index of the generalised laguerre polynomials eq . ( [ laguerre ] ) in terms of which we have expressed expectation values of characteristic polynomials can be chosen accordingly . the more sever problem is the following . due to kramer s degeneracy the eigenvalues @xmath37 of a self - dual quaternion valued @xmath27 matrix @xmath235 always come in pairs , implying @xmath236=\prod_{j=1}^n(x - x_j)^2 $ ] . consequently the mass terms generated from eq . ( [ matrixrep ] ) always occur with an _ even _ power @xmath0 of two - fold degenerate masses in eq . ( [ partitionfunct ] ) . in contrast in eq . ( [ gap - shift ] ) we always need to evaluate an odd number of powers @xmath237 . thus as for @xmath48 with even @xmath24 we need to evaluate square roots of determinants in order to compute the gap probability for @xmath232 . this is an open problem so far and only the gap probability ( and smallest eigenvalue distribution ) with @xmath227 is known explicitly @xcite . a taylor series expansion exists though for @xmath238 , following from group integrals of kaneko - type @xcite . after having exhaustively presented the solution of the eigenvalues model eq . ( [ partitionfunct ] ) and its correlation functions for a finite number of eigenvalues @xmath34 at arbitrary @xmath0 for @xmath47 , we will now turn to the large-@xmath34 limit . as it is true in general in rmt one has to distinguish between different large-@xmath34 scaling regimes . the global spectral statistics , which includes the global macroscopic density given by the semi - circle law for the gue , or the marchenko - pastur law for the chgue , see figure [ fig : mpdensity ] , is concerned with correlations between eigenvalues that have many other eigenvalues ( in fact a finite fraction of all ) in between them . for a discussion of this large-@xmath34 limit alternative techniques are available such as loop - equations , and we refer to @xcite for a standard reference where all correlation functions including subleading contributions are computed recursively for @xmath47 . in this limit the fluctuations of the eigenvalues on a local scale ( of a few eigenvalues ) are averaged out , and typically expectation values factorise . in contrast when magnifying the fluctuations among eigenvalues at a distance of @xmath239 one speaks of microscopic limits . the value of @xmath240 and the form of the limiting kernel depend on the location in the spectrum , see figure [ fig : mpdensity ] . at the so - called soft edge of the marchenko - pastur law one finds the airy - kernel , whereas in the bulk of the spectrum the sine - kernel is found , see e.g. @xcite . here we will be interested in the eigenvalues in the vicinity of the origin presenting a hard edge with @xmath241 and the limiting kernel to be computed below is the bessel - kernel . why this limit is relevant for the application of rmt to qcd has been indicated already in the introduction after eq . ( [ bcrel ] ) . as a further consequence of this comparison to qcd we will change variables from wishart eigenvalues @xmath37 of @xmath30 to dirac operator eigenvalues @xmath36 ( more details follow in section [ symm ] ) . looking at the partition function eq . ( [ partitionfunct ] ) the dirac eigenvalues and masses have to be rescaled with the same power in @xmath34 . otherwise we would immediately loose the dependence on the masses . on the rmt side the hard - edge scaling limit zooming into the vicinity of the origin is conventionally defined including factors by taking @xmath32 and @xmath242 , such that the following product remains finite - independent here in contrast to other conventions . ] @xmath243 in the last subsection we have eventually expressed all quantities of interest in terms of the laguerre polynomials of the quenched weight . therefore the only piece of information we need to take the asymptotic limit of all these quantities is the well known limit @xcite : @xmath244 consequently all laguerre polynomials of positive argument turn into @xmath245-bessel functions . those polynomials containing negative arguments will turn into @xmath246-bessel functions , due to the relation @xmath247 for integer @xmath24 . note that both types of bessel functions also appear together , see e.g. in eqs . ( [ pmassive ] ) and ( [ kernelmassive ] ) . the asymptotics of the laguerre op eq . ( [ laguerrelim ] ) in fact holds for op with respect to much more general weight functions . this phenomenon is called universality . after first results in @xcite more sophisticated rigorous mathematical methods including the riemann - hilbert approach were developed , see chapter 6 by a. kuijlaars in @xcite for a detailed discussion and for references . in the following we will give a few examples for the hard edge limit , starting with the partition function . looking at eq . ( [ zmassive ] ) it is clear that we have to normalise it differently , such that the limit exists and gives a function of the limiting masses from eq . ( [ rmtmass ] ) . for @xmath248 this is very easy to do by dividing out the quenched partition function , and we define : @xmath249}(m)=m^{\nu}n^{-\frac{\nu}{2}}\frac{z_n^{[n_f=1]}(m)}{z_n n!}= m^{\nu}n^{-\frac{\nu}{2 } } l_n^\nu(-m^2)\ , \label{zrmtredef}\ ] ] leading to the limit @xmath250}(m)={\cal z}^{[n_f=1]}(\tilde{m})= i_\nu(\tilde{m})\ . \label{zrmtnf1}\ ] ] note that our conventions are chosen such that for small mass the limiting partition function behaves as @xmath251}(\tilde{m}\approx0)\sim \tilde{m}^\nu$ ] , rather than unity . the reason for this choice will also become transparent in the next section . for general @xmath0 we do not spell out the normalisation constant explicitly and directly give the limiting result for non - degenerate masses @xmath252}(\{m\})={\cal z}^{[n_f]}(\{\tilde{m}\})= 2^{\frac{n_f(n_f-1)}{2}}\prod_{j=0}^{n_f-1}\gamma(j+1)\ \frac{\det_{1\leq f , g\leq n_f}\left[\tilde{m}_f^{g-1}i_{\nu+g-1}(\tilde{m}_f)\right]}{\delta_{n_f}(\{\tilde{m}^2\})}\ , \label{zrmtnf}\ ] ] where we adopted the normalisation from @xcite . in the completely degenerate limit this leads to : @xmath253}\right|_{m_f = m } { \cal z}^{[n_f]}(\tilde{m } ) = { \det_{1\leq f , g\leq n_f}\left[i_{\nu+g - f}(\tilde{m})\right]}\ . \label{zrmtnfdeg}\ ] ] the direct limit @xmath32 of eq . ( [ zmassivedeg ] ) ( or lhopital s ) rule from eq . ( [ zrmtnf ] ) ) leading to a determinant of derivatives of @xmath246-bessel functions can be brought to this form of a toeplitz determinant using identities for bessel functions . as the next step we will directly jump to the limiting kernel , the reason being two - fold . first , it is shorter to directly construct all correlation function form the kernel , eq . ( [ kernelmassive ] ) , rather than constructing the kernel through the massive op s first . second and more importantly , the limit of the individual op s does not necessarily exist . while here in the hard edge limit this is not the case , the well - known sine- and cosine - asymptotic of the hermite polynomials in the bulk of the spectrum is only achieved after multiplying them with the square root of the weight function . we obtain for the limiting kernel from eq . ( [ kernelmassive ] ) , after appropriately normalising and changing to dirac eigenvalues , @xmath254}(\tilde{y}_1,\tilde{y}_2)&\sim & \lim_{\stackrel{\mbox{\small $ n\to\infty$}}{\mbox{\small $ x_1,x_2,m_f\to0 $ } } } ( w(x_1)w(x_2))^{\frac12}k_n^{[n_f]}(x_1,x_2)\nonumber\\ & = & \frac{1}{(\tilde{y}_1 ^ 2-\tilde{y}_2 ^ 2)\prod_{f=1}^{n_f}\sqrt{(\tilde{y}_1 ^ 2+\tilde{m}_f^2)(\tilde{y}_2 ^ 2+\tilde{m}_f^2 ) } } \frac { \left| \begin{array}{lll } i_\nu(\tilde{m}_1)&\ldots&\tilde{m}_1^{n_f+1}i_{n_f+\nu+1}(\tilde{m}_1)\\ \vdots & & \vdots\\ i_\nu(\tilde{m}_{n_f})&\ldots&\tilde{m}_{n_f}^{n_f+1}i_{n_f+\nu+1}(\tilde{m}_{n_f})\\ j_\nu(\tilde{y}_1)&\ldots&(-\tilde{y}_1)^{n_f+1}j_{\nu+n_f+1}(\tilde{y}_1)\\ j_\nu(\tilde{y}_2)&\ldots&(-\tilde{y}_2)^{n_f+1}j_{\nu+n_f+1}(\tilde{y}_2)\\ \end{array } \right| } { \det_{1\leq f , g\leq n_f}[m_f^{g-1}i_{\nu+g-1}(\tilde{m}_f)]}.\ \ \ \ \label{kernelmassivelim}\end{aligned}\ ] ] at @xmath25 it reduces to the standard bessel - kernel : @xmath255 here we have given two equivalent forms of the same kernel using an identity @xcite for @xmath245-bessel functions , @xmath256 . following eq . ( [ rkb2 ] ) we have already included the weight function into the limiting kernel above . while the exponential part cancels out due to @xmath257\to1 $ ] the remaining @xmath24-dependent part is contributing . we can thus immediately write down an example , the quenched microscopic density @xmath258 we have omitted here the @xmath24 delta - functions of the exact zero - eigenvalues . they will enter the discussion later in subsection [ wrmt ] where they can be seen . the density is plotted in figure [ fig : besseldensity ] for @xmath227 and 1 . the next step is to obtain the limiting distribution of the smallest eigenvalue . because we change from wishart to dirac eigenvalues @xmath259 , we obtain the following scaling limit for the examples of the gap probability ( [ e0nu0 ] ) and ( [ e0nu1 ] ) at @xmath25 , using the same scaling for the dirac eigenvalues as in eq . ( [ rmtmass ] ) : @xmath260 note that the extra power of @xmath34 from the shift ( [ gap - shift ] ) leads to the fact that here the exponential is not vanishing . the liming quenched gap probability for general @xmath24 follows from the completely degenerate massive partition function ( [ zrmtnfdeg ] ) : @xmath261\ . \label{equenched}\ ] ] the limiting distribution of the corresponding smallest dirac eigenvalue follows according to eq . ( [ p1 ] ) , after changing to dirac eigenvalues : @xmath262 where for the last step we have used an identity for bessel functions . the last two formulas are compared to the quenched bessel density eq . ( [ besseldensity ] ) in figure [ fig : besseldensity ] . it turns out that for general @xmath24 the derivative of the determinant in eq . ( [ equenched ] ) can be written again as a determinant , following the ideas sketched after eq . ( [ e0nu1 ] ) that the distribution of the smallest eigenvalue can itself be expressed in term of an expectation value of characteristic polynomials , @xmath263\ , \label{p1quenched}\ ] ] see @xcite for a detailed derivation , including masses . ( 12.2,5.5 ) ) and the distribution of the smallest eigenvalue for @xmath227 ( left ) and @xmath264 ( right ) using eqs . ( [ p1nu0lim ] ) and ( [ p1nu1lim ] ) . it can be nicely seen how the distribution of the smallest eigenvalues follows the microscopic density for small @xmath265 . the local maxima of the density further to the right mark the locations of the second , third etc . eigenvalues , cf . the limiting value @xmath266 that equals the macroscopic density at the origin is marked as a horizontal line . [ fig : besseldensity],title="fig:",width=264 ] ) and the distribution of the smallest eigenvalue for @xmath227 ( left ) and @xmath264 ( right ) using eqs . ( [ p1nu0lim ] ) and ( [ p1nu1lim ] ) . it can be nicely seen how the distribution of the smallest eigenvalues follows the microscopic density for small @xmath265 . the local maxima of the density further to the right mark the locations of the second , third etc . eigenvalues , cf . the limiting value @xmath266 that equals the macroscopic density at the origin is marked as a horizontal line . [ fig : besseldensity],title="fig:",width=264 ] ( 0.1,0.2)@xmath265 ( -7.1,0.2)@xmath265 ( -2.5,3.5)@xmath267 ( -10.8,3.5)@xmath267 ( -3.5,1.4)@xmath268 ( -11.5,1.4)@xmath268 it should be mentioned that alternative representations exist for the gap probability eq . ( [ p1quenched ] ) that are based on fredholm determinant analysis @xcite . they are given in terms of an exponential of an integral of the solution of a painlev v equation , which is valid for any real @xmath269 . for integer values of @xmath24 this expression reduces to the simpler forms that we have given here . furthermore , in @xcite representations in terms of hypergeometric functions with matrix argument were given that are valid for all @xmath270 . in @xcite the equivalence to the above expressions for @xmath47 was proved . the distributions that we have computed so far , as for example the density and smallest eigenvalue in figure [ fig : besseldensity ] have been extensively compared to numerical solutions from lattice qcd . for example the quenched densitiy in figure [ fig : besseldensity ] was matched with qcd in @xcite , whereas the quenched distribution of the smallest eigenvalue also given in figure [ fig : besseldensity ] was compared in @xcite to qcd for different values of @xmath24 ( and also to other qfts corresponding to @xmath67 ) . a matching to unquenched results for the smallest eigenvalues can be found in @xcite , and we refer to @xcite for a more exhaustive discussion of the lattice results . apart from giving non - specialists some idea about the theory of quantum chromodynamics ( qcd ) we will have to answer three major questions in this section : * how is the dirac operator defined the spectrum of which can be described by rmt ? * what are the global symmetries of qcd that determine the rmt to be used ? * what is the limit that leads from qcd to this rmt ? let us give first short answers that also indicate how this section will be organised . the eigenvalues of the qcd dirac operator will be partly described by rmt , actually only its smallest eigenvalues , and we will introduce this operator first in subsection [ qcd ] . the anti - hermiticity properties of the dirac operator and the concept of chiral symmetry will allow us to introduce some formal aspects and the definition of the qcd partition function . the breaking of chiral symmetry in subsection [ xsb ] then leads us to the first approximation of qcd , to chiral perturbation theory that only contains the lightest excitations , the goldstone bosons . in a last step in subsection [ echpt ] this interacting non - linear , effective qft is simplified in the epsilon - regime , that agrees with rmt to leading order . in what follows it is important that we will talk about space - time coordinates @xmath271 with components @xmath272 , @xmath273 equipped with the euclidean metric @xmath274 given by the kronecker symbol . this so - called wick rotation from minkowski to euclidean metric is necessary for two reasons : only in this setting does the dirac operator have defined anti - hermiticity properties , and second only for qcd on a euclidean space - time lattice numerical solutions of qcd can be easily performed to which we can compare our rmt . we use einstein s summation conventions meaning that greek indices appearing twice are automatically summed over from 1 to 4 . the qcd dirac operator is a linear , matrix valued differential operator defined as follows : @xmath275 where @xmath276 . the @xmath277 are the dirac - gamma matrices in euclidean space - time , satisfying the clifford algebra @xmath278 the curly brackets denote the anti - commutator . a standard representation as @xmath279 matrices is given as follows in terms of the pauli matrices @xmath280 , @xmath281 : @xmath282 all matrices are hermitian , @xmath283 , including @xmath284 . this is only true in the euclidean setting . obviously one can construct projection operators as @xmath285 the real parameter @xmath6 in the dirac operator is the coupling constant of the strong interactions , thus @xmath286 corresponds to the free dirac operator without interactions . it acts on 4-vectors @xmath287 called spinors in minkowski space , due to their transformation properties there which we do nt need to specify here . the real vector potential @xmath288 is an element of this lie group for the three colours ( the subscript @xmath289 stands for colour ) . it is a scalar with respect to the @xmath277 s , just as the partial derivatives in eq . ( [ dirac ] ) . the @xmath287 come in 3 copies with colours blue @xmath290 , green @xmath291 and red @xmath292 , and so the interacting dirac operator acts on the full vector @xmath293 . for each quark flavour up , down etc . we have such a vector @xmath294 with @xmath295 . in the standard model of elementary particle physics we have @xmath3 , but often we will keep @xmath0 fixed as a free parameter . we could have written the dirac operator with tensor product notation to underline these structures , but the precise @xmath296 structure will not be crucial in the following . we are now ready to state some important global symmetries of the dirac operator . first , it follows from the algebra ( [ clifford ] ) that @xmath297 the dirac operator is block off - diagonal also called chiral , where the symbol @xmath298 still denotes a differential operator that depends on @xmath33 and @xmath299 . suppose we can find the eigenfunctions @xmath300 of the dirac operator labelled by @xmath62 : @xmath301 in a suitably regularised setting ( e.g. a finite box ) . because of the anti - hermiticity the eigenvalues @xmath302 are purely imaginary . furthermore , because of eq . ( [ dchiral ] ) multiplying equation ( [ eigenfunct ] ) by @xmath284 leads to different eigenfunctions @xmath303 with eigenvalues @xmath304 , provided that @xmath305 . thus the non - zero eigenvalues of the dirac operator come in pairs @xmath306 . the euclidean qcd partition function or path integral as it is called in qft can be formally written down as follows : @xmath307\int[d\psi]\exp\left [ -\int d^4x \sum_{q=1}^{n_f}\overline{\psi}^q(x)(d\!\!\!\!/+m_q)\psi^q(x)-\int d^4x \frac12\mbox{tr}(f_{\mu\nu}f_{\mu\nu } ) \right]\nonumber\\ & = & \int[da_\mu]\prod_{q=1}^{n_f}\det[d\!\!\!\!/+m_q]\exp\left [ -\int d^4x \frac12\mbox{tr}(f_{\mu\nu}f_{\mu\nu})\right]\ . \label{zqcd}\end{aligned}\ ] ] here @xmath308 is the dirac conjugate and the @xmath296 field strength tensor is defined by the commutator @xmath309=-ig_sf_{\mu\nu}$ ] . the integration over @xmath310 and @xmath311 are formal ( path ) integrals that we will not specify in the following , see standard textbooks on qcd for a discussion as @xcite . in the second equation however we have formally integrated out the quarks due to the following observation . for a complex @xmath34-vector @xmath312 and @xmath27 matrix @xmath313 we have @xmath314\sim \frac{1}{\det[b]}\ , \ \ \int d^{2n}\psi\exp[-\psi^\dag b \psi]\sim { \det[b]}\ , \label{detintegrals}\ ] ] whereas in the second identity we have integrated over a complex vector @xmath315 of anticommuting variables . integration and differentiation over such fermionic variables can be defined in a precise way , and we refer to chapter 7 in @xcite for details . the reason for fermions to be represented by anti - commuting variables is that in the canonical quantisation of free dirac fields one has to use anti - commutators for these fields . comparing eq . ( [ dchiral ] ) and the second line of eq . ( [ zqcd ] ) with eq . ( [ matrixrep ] ) we already get a first idea about the random matrix approximation of qcd , as it was suggested initially in @xcite : the dirac operator from eq . ( [ dchiral ] ) is replaced by a constant matrix with the same block structure , @xmath316 , and the average over the fields strength tensor is replaced by a gaussian average over @xmath28 . we further learn in this approximation that the eigenvalues @xmath317 of the gaussian random matrix @xmath30 correspond to the squared eigenvalues of the dirac operator rotated to the real line , and that the number of eigenvalues @xmath34 is proportional to the dimension of the qcd dirac operator truncated in this way . however , as we will explain in the next subsection the precise form of the limit from qcd to rmt was better understood later , representing a controlled approximation . furthermore , in the case when all masses vanish @xmath318 the action in the exponent in the first line of eq . ( [ zqcd ] ) has an additional symmetry . defining the vector @xmath319 as well as the projections @xmath320 onto left ( l ) and right ( r ) chirality we can write the fermionic part of the action as @xmath321 it is invariant under the global rotations @xmath322 with @xmath323 and likewise for @xmath324 . in contrast , even when all masses are equal , @xmath325 , the mass term @xmath326 is only invariant under the diagonal transformation with @xmath327 . in qcd the resulting global symmetry is @xmath328 , with the @xmath329-factors called @xmath330 for vector and @xmath331 for axial - vector split off . the latter is broken through quantum effects also called an anomaly , whereas the former remains unbroken through the mass term . this leads to the explicit chiral symmetry breaking pattern in qcd : @xmath332 in this subsection we will describe the first step of simplifying qcd to what is called its low - energy effective theory . we begin with the following observation . it is found that the qcd vacuum @xmath333 , the ground state with the lowest energy , breaks chiral symmetry _ spontaneously _ , in precisely the same way as the theory with equal masses in eq . ( [ xsbpattern ] ) breaks it explicitly : @xmath334 the parameter @xmath8 is called the chiral condensate and it is the order parameter for the spontaneous breaking of the chiral symmetry ( [ xsbpattern ] ) . it turns out that for qcd the low energy phase with non - vanishing @xmath11 coincides with the phase or different representations this is not necessarily the case . ] where the quarks and the gluons , the carriers of the strong interaction represented by @xmath299 , are confined to colourless objects , see the phase diagram in figure [ fig : phasediag ] . in the phase with @xmath11 we need lattice qcd or other effective field theory description ( such as rmt ) because a perturbative expansion in the coupling constant @xmath6 will not work here , because the coupling is large . an important consequence was drawn by banks and casher @xcite , relating the global continuum density @xmath335 of the dirac operator eigenvalues in eq . ( [ eigenfunct ] ) at the origin , suitably regularised in a finite volume @xmath18 , to @xmath8 : @xmath336 here we added the second order term to eq . ( [ bcrel ] ) derived by stern and smilga @xcite , containing the pion decay constant @xmath337 as an additional parameter . the first term leads to the following interpretation : at the origin the global density is constant , and thus the average distance between eigenvalues there is @xmath338 . this is very different from free particles in a box where @xmath339 with @xmath340 in 4 euclidean dimensions . one can thus say that the smallest dirac operator eigenvalues make an important contribution to build up the chiral condensate @xmath11 , by piling up very closely spaced at the origin . we are thus lead to define rescaled , dimensionless eigenvalues and masses , as they appear on the same footing inside the determinant in eq . ( [ zqcd ] ) , together with a rescaled microscopic density of the dirac operator @xmath341 : @xmath342 this is called the microscopic limit of qcd . it has to be compared e.g. to eq . ( [ besseldensity ] ) for @xmath25 , after identifying rescaled rmt eigenvalues @xmath343 and masses @xmath344 from eq . ( [ rmtmass ] ) . the breaking of a global continuous symmetry in any theory leads to goldstone bosons . this can be visualised by analogy in figure [ fig : goldstone ] , showing the classical potential of a particle before ( left ) and after symmetry breaking ( right ) . in the left picture with a convex potential any excitation to make a particle move in the potential costs energy . after symmetry breaking the curvature at the origin has changed . consequently there now exists the possibility to excite a mode in angular direction along the valley of the potential , without costing potential energy . modes that do need energy to be excited still exist in radial direction . ( 12.2,5.5 ) before symmetry breaking ( @xmath345 , left ) and after breaking ( @xmath346 , right ) , obtained simply by switching the sign of the quadratic term . [ fig : goldstone],title="fig:",width=264 ] before symmetry breaking ( @xmath345 , left ) and after breaking ( @xmath346 , right ) , obtained simply by switching the sign of the quadratic term . [ fig : goldstone],title="fig:",width=264 ] ( -5.0,0.7)@xmath33 ( -12.0,0.7)@xmath33 ( -7.0,4.8)@xmath347 ( -0.9,1.4)@xmath187 ( -7.9,1.4)@xmath187 ( -14.1,4.8)@xmath348 in our analogy particles that require energy to be excited correspond to massive particles . consequently after symmetry breaking there appear massless modes - the goldstone bosons - and modes that remain massive . if in qcd chiral symmetry was an exact symmetry we would expect to observe exactly massless goldstone bosons in the phase with broken symmetry . however , it is only an approximate symmetry due to @xmath349 , leading to approximately massless bosons after symmetry breaking . these are the 3 light pions observed in nature , @xmath350 and @xmath351 , with masses of about 135 mev compared to the heavier non - goldstone particles with masses of 800 -1000 mev . recall that in the confined phase we only observe colourless bound states made from two quarks , mesons , which are bosons , from three quarks , baryons , which are fermions , or more . the pions are unstable and decay mostly into a muon and its anti - neutrino for @xmath352 , the corresponding anti - particles for @xmath353 , or 2 photons for @xmath351 . the number of goldstone bosons equals the dimension of the coset @xmath354 of the groups before and after breaking , which is @xmath355 , the dimension of @xmath356 in our case . to consider the pions as goldstone bosons thus means that we only keep the lightest quarks up and down , so that @xmath4 in our theory . for many purposes at low energy this is a good approximation . sometimes also the strange quark is included , with @xmath357 leading to consider the 8 lightest particles as goldstone bosons . if we neglect all non - goldstone bosons in our theory - as they will not be relevant at low enough energies - and formally integrate them out we arrive at the low - energy effective theory of the goldstone bosons , @xmath358\exp\left[-\int d^4x \frac{f_\pi^2}{4}\mbox{tr}\left({\partial_\mu u(x)}{\partial_\mu u(x)^\dag}\right ) + \int d^4x\frac{\sigma}{2}\mbox{tr}\left(m(u(x)+u^\dag(x))\right ) \right ] \label{zchpt}\ ] ] where @xmath359 , \ m=\mbox{diag}(m_1,\ldots , m_{n_f } ) . \label{u(x)}\ ] ] here the implicit sum over @xmath290 runs from 1 to @xmath355 . for @xmath4 the 3 fields @xmath360 actually denote the pion fields , with @xmath361 and @xmath362 . in eq . ( [ u(x ) ] ) we have already split off the constant , @xmath33-independent modes @xmath363 of the fields @xmath360 for later convenience . usually at this stage @xmath363 is set to the identity . ( [ zchpt ] ) represents the partition function or path integral of chiral perturbation theory ( chpt ) , which replaces that of qcd eq . ( [ zqcd ] ) in the low - energy regime . in eq . ( [ zchpt ] ) we only give the leading order ( lo ) lagrangian , all higher order terms in powers of @xmath364 and its derivatives that are invariant exist and we will come back to the question when they contribute in the next section . for more details about chpt we refer to @xcite . chpt is an interacting , non - linear qft . when expanding the exponential in eq . ( [ u(x ) ] ) in powers of @xmath360 and considering only quadratic terms we obtain the standard lagrangian for scalar fields that leads to the klein - gordon equation . from that expansion we can make the following identification for the masses @xmath365 of the pion fields @xmath360 , the gell - mann oakes renner ( gor ) relation : @xmath366 the qft in eq . ( [ zchpt ] ) is not yet related to rmt , and we turn to this limit in the next subsection . the so - called epsilon - regime of chpt ( echpt ) was introduced by gasser and leutwyler @xcite before a rmt of qcd was constructed . their motivation was to introduce a regime where analytic computations in chpt were feasible , in particular to understand the mass dependence of the partition function and the role of topology . in particular leutwyler and smilga later computed the partition function analytically in this regime and deduced so - called sum rules for the dirac operator eigenvalues @xcite . working in a finite volume @xmath340 of linear size @xmath126 , the authors of @xcite introduced the following scaling : @xmath367 this scaling implies in particular @xmath368 where the former follows from the microscopic scaling limit of the banks - casher relation ( [ microlim ] ) , and the latter ensures that the kinetic term of the lo action is dimensionless . the physical interpretation of the epsilon - regime follows from the scaling of the pion mass , which is implied from multiplying the gor relation eq . ( [ gor ] ) with @xmath18 . it has to hold that @xmath369 , such that both sides are of the order @xmath370 . in other words , the compton wavelength of the pion fields is much larger than the size of the box : @xmath371 which is clearly an unphysical regime . normally one would consider this to be undesirable , because in order to observe physical , propagating pions one would choose a scaling such that the pions do fit into the box @xmath18 , with @xmath372 . in the so - called @xmath373-regime both momenta and pion mass are scaled in the same way , @xmath374 , where such an inequality can be satisfied . we will come back to this issue very briefly below . in the epsilon - regime introduced above we obtain the following limit @xcite @xmath375 \exp\left[-\int d^4x \frac12\partial_\mu\pi^b(x)\partial_\mu\pi^b(x ) \right]\int_{su(n_f)}du_0\exp\left[\frac12 \sigma v\mbox{tr}(m(u_0+u_0^\dag))+{\cal o}(\epsilon^2)\right ] . \label{zechpt}\ ] ] here the propagating modes @xmath360 completely factorise from the zero - modes @xmath363 and contribute to the partition function as a free gaussian field theory - which is just a constant factor . the reason that we do not expand in the constant modes of the pions as well , but keep them as a full matrix @xmath363 as in eq . ( [ u(x ) ] ) is that their quantum fluctuations are of @xmath376 , see @xcite for a more detailed discussion . all higher order terms including those not given in the chiral lagrangian ( [ zchpt ] ) are subleading in this limit . it is in this limit that the mass - dependence of the limiting partition function eq . ( [ zechpt ] ) and of rmt agree , and in fact also all dirac operator eigenvalue correlation functions . before we make this statement more precise let us add further comments . first , it is not only possible to make analytical computations in the epsilon - regime , but also to compare them to lattice qcd . on the lattice the simulation parameters can be freely chosen , such that the epsilon - regime is reached and a quantitative comparison is possible . second , it is possible to compute so - called one or higher loop corrections to the partition function ( and correlation functions ) eq . ( [ zechpt ] ) . for example writing down the @xmath377 term explicitly , expanding the exponential and using wick s theorem with the finite volume propagator corresponds to computing the one - loop corrections . third , one may perform also perturbative computations in the physical @xmath373-regime , or even chose an extrapolation between the two regimes , cf . @xcite for a discussion and references . let us now make the map between rmt and echpt more precise . for that purpose it is convenient to introduce an extra term in the qcd lagrangian , the so - called theta - vacuum term containing the dual field strength tensor @xmath378 . it is defined using the totally antisymmetric epsilon - tensor @xmath379 in 4 dimensions . the extra term reads in appropriate normalisation : @xmath380 it is a topological term , and here @xmath24 is the number of left handed @xmath381 minus right handed @xmath382 zero modes of the dirac operator eq . ( [ dirac ] ) - which so far has not made an appearance in this section about qcd . due to the atiah - singer index theorem @xmath24 is equal to the winding number of the gauge fields @xmath299 which is also a topological quantity . in the partition function eq . ( [ zqcd ] ) we have thus implicitly summed over all the topologies , which can now be written as follows : @xmath383 here @xmath384 denotes the qcd partition function at fixed topology . inverting this equation it can be written as @xmath385 what is the advantage ? in rmt in the previous section we always had a fixed @xmath386 - to which we should now compare for non - negative values . ] . furthermore , the unitary group integral over @xmath356 that we found in the epsilon - regime eq . ( [ zechpt ] ) can now be promoted to an integral over the full unitary group , according to @xmath387^\nu \label{groupint}\ ] ] defining the rescaled quark masses in the epsilon - regime as follows , @xmath388 we obtain the limiting relation between the mass - dependent part of the qcd partition function in the epsilon - regime at fixed topology and rmt : @xmath389}(\{\hat{m}\})&=&\int_{u(n_f ) } du_0\det[u_0]^\nu\exp\left[\frac12 \mbox{tr}(\hat{m}(u_0+u_0^\dag))\right]\nonumber\\ & = & 2^{\frac{n_f(n_f-1)}{2}}\prod_{j=0}^{n_f-1}\gamma(j+1 ) \frac{\det_{1\leq i , j\leq n_f}[\hat{m}_i^{j-1}i_\nu(\hat{m}_i)]}{\delta_{n_f}(\{\hat{m}^2\})}= % \lim_{\stackrel{\mbox{\small $ n\to\infty$}}{\mbox{\small $ m_f\to0 $ } } } { \cal z}^{[n_f]}(\{\hat{m}\})\ . \label{lsint}\end{aligned}\ ] ] in the last equality with the limiting rmt partition function from eq . ( [ zrmtnf ] ) we have identified rescaled random matrix and qcd quark masses @xmath344 for all flavours . the computation of the integral over the appropriately normalised haar measure of the unitary group @xmath390 in eq . ( [ lsint ] ) goes back to @xcite , see also @xcite and @xcite for our normalisation . a concise derivation in terms of group characters was presented in @xcite . in the simplest case with @xmath248 it is easy to see that : @xmath391}(\hat{m})=\int_{-\pi}^\pi\frac{d\theta}{2\pi } e^{i\nu\theta}\exp\left [ \frac12 \hat{m}(e^{i\theta}+e^{-i\theta})\right]=i_\nu(\hat{m})\ , \label{zechptnf1}\ ] ] which is one of the standard definitions of the modified bessel - function . furthermore , we can also verify the completely degenerate case @xmath392 , by applying the andrief formula ( [ andreiev ] ) . diagonalising @xmath363 by a unitary transformation @xmath393 , @xmath394 , we obtain again the squared vandermonde determinant as a jacobian : @xmath395^\nu\exp\left[\frac{\hat{m}}{2}\mbox{tr}(u_0+u_0^\dag)\right]=const . \prod_{j=1}^{n_f}\left(\int_{-\pi}^\pi\frac{d\theta_j}{2\pi}\exp[i\nu\theta_j+\hat{m}\cos(\theta_j)]\right ) |\delta_{n_f}(\{e^{i\theta}\})|^2\nonumber\\ & = & n_f!\ const.\det_{1\leq j , k\leq n_f}\left [ \int_{-\pi}^\pi\frac{d\theta}{2\pi}\exp[i(\nu+k - j)\theta+\hat{m}\cos(\theta)]\right]=\det_{1\leq j , k\leq n_f}[i_{\nu+k - j}(\hat{m})]\ . \label{zdeg}\end{aligned}\ ] ] it agrees with eq . ( [ zrmtnfdeg ] ) from rmt , after appropriately normalising . we observe that both for degenerate and non - degenerate masses the partition functions with @xmath0 flavours eqs . ( [ lsint ] ) and ( [ zdeg ] ) are determinants of single flavour partition functions with @xmath248 . the matching of the limiting rmt partition function and the group integral from the epsilon - regime of chpt at fixed topology is only part of their equivalence . in particular this matching does not imply that all dirac operator eigenvalue correlation functions agree . for example at @xmath248 the echpt partition function agrees for all three symmetry classes @xmath52 @xcite , while their densities differ . at first sight it is not clear how to access the dirac operator spectrum , once we have moved from the quarks to the goldstone bosons as fundamental low energy degrees of freedom . however , looking at the alternative construction of the spectral density via the resolvent eq . ( [ resolvent ] ) helps . consider adding an auxiliary pair of quarks with masses @xmath33 and @xmath187 respectively to the qcd lagrangian eq . ( [ zqcd ] ) . if we arrange for the second quark to be bosonic , we obtain the following average with respect to the unperturbed qcd partition function , at fixed topology : @xmath396}{\det[y - d\!\!\!\!/\ ] } \right\rangle_\nu^{\rm qcd}= \frac{\int_{u(n_f+1|1 ) } du_0\ \mbox{sdet}[u_0]^\nu\exp\left[\frac12 \mbox{str}(\hat{{\cal m}}(u_0+u_0^\dag))\right ] } { { \cal z}_{\rm echpt}^{[n_f]}(\{\hat{m}\})}\ , \label{qcdresolvent}\ ] ] with @xmath397 , in the limit of the epsilon - regime . because of the bosonic nature of the second auxiliary quark in the denominator the integral is now over the supergroup @xmath398 with the corresponding supersymmetric trace and determinant , str and sdet respectively , see e.g. chapter 7 of @xcite . its evaluation and differentiation to obtain the resolvent has to be done carefully . in @xcite to where we refer for details it was shown in this fashion that the microscopic density eq . ( [ besseldensity ] ) and its extension to arbitrary @xmath0 follows from eq . ( [ qcdresolvent ] ) , thus establishing the equivalence to rmt on the level of the microscopic density . in order to know the distribution of the smallest eigenvalues the knowledge of all density correlation functions is necessary , see eq . ( [ expand ] ) , as was pointed out in @xcite . the equivalence proof for all @xmath62-point density correlation functions was achieved in @xcite by directly matching the @xmath62-point resolvent generating functions with @xmath399 additional ratios of quark determinants of both theories , using superbosonisation techniques . a few comments regarding universality and corrections to the rmt regime are in place here . already the fact that two apparently different theories as echpt and rmt yield the same dirac operator correlation functions is a striking result which is based on symmetries and universality . it is thus surprising that even when taking into account one - loop corrections to echpt the same universal correlation functions were found in @xcite . the only corrections to be made are subsumed in a modification @xmath400 , and @xmath401 , where @xmath402 and @xmath403 are constants that depend on @xmath0 , @xmath337 and the geometry of the discretisation , see e.g. @xcite for details and references . so far @xmath337 did not appear in eigenvalue correlation functions , but later when including a chemical potential it will . this modification means that the chiral condensate ( and pion decay constant ) and thus the rescaled masses in eq . ( [ hatm ] ) and eigenvalues simply get renormalised accordingly . only two - loop corrections within echpt contain non - universal terms that lead out of the rmt universality class @xcite . however , even at the lo the agreement between the rmt and echpt rapidly breaks down when going to higher energies , meaning to higher rescaled dirac operator eigenvalues . at some point the fluctuating modes will start to contribute , and eventually also the chpt approach breaks down as contributions from full qcd will appear . the scale where this happens has been called thouless energy @xcite in analogy to applications in condensed matter physics , to where we refer for details . the point where this happens scales with @xmath404 and @xmath405 . beyond this scale one sees a rise of the global spectral density as in eq . ( [ bcss ] ) , away from the rmt prediction . the scaling of the thouless energy has been confirmed from lattice data in a different theory , in qft with two colours @xcite . for the same theory deep in the bulk regime the local statistics was seen to agree again with rmt bulk statistics of the gse @xcite , which is the non - chiral @xmath232 symmetry class . here we have already mentioned one of the two different symmetry classes corresponding to @xmath48 and 4 in eq . ( [ partitionfunct ] ) . they are also relevant but for different qfts other than qcd , e.g. with only two colours @xmath406 . these have chiral symmetry patters different from eq . ( [ xsbpattern ] ) and we refer to @xcite for a detailed discussion . the matching with the 3 chiral rmts in eq . ( [ partitionfunct ] ) was initially proposed in @xcite . while the agreement with lattice simulations of the respective theories ( cf . @xcite ) leave little doubt that these rmt are equivalent to the epsilon - regime of the corresponding chpt , such an equivalence has not been established even on the level of the partition function for general @xmath0 . this is due to the more complicated structure of the corresponding group integral , see however @xcite and @xcite for a discussion . let us briefly comment also on the influence of the dimension . in 3 space - time dimensions there is no chiral symmetry , and the rmt for qcd is given by the gue instead @xcite , including mass terms . in 2 dimensions which again has chiral symmetry the classification is much richer , and we refer to @xcite for details . this makes contact with the symmetry classification of topological insulators @xcite and the so - called bott - periodicity in any dimension . in this section we will cover some recent developments in the application of rmt to qcd , where the detailed dependence of the partition function and dirac operator eigenvalue correlation functions on finite lattice spacing @xmath19 or chemical potential @xmath10 are computed . in the first subsection [ wrmt ] we will study the influence of a finite space - time lattice on the spectrum as it is expected to be seen in numerical simulation of qcd on a finite lattice far enough from the continuum . the corresponding rmt and effective field theory that we will consider go under the name of wilson ( w)rmt as introduced in @xcite , and wilson ( w)chpt , see @xcite for a standard reference . we will only sketch the ideas beginning with the symmetries and wchpt , and then write down the joint density of eigenvalues of the hermitian wilson dirac operator . its solution and its non - hermitian part will be referred to the literature . the addition of a chemical potential term for the quarks to the dirac operator renders its eigenvalues complex . the solution of the corresponding rmt using op in the complex plane is sketched in the second subsection [ rmtmu ] where we will give some details . the first application of such a rmt was already introduced by stephanov in 1996 @xcite to explain the difference between the quenched and unquenched theory . the development of the corresponding theory of op in the complex plane started later in @xcite and @xcite . it is already partly covered in the les houches lecture notes from 2005 @xcite , for a slightly more recent review on rmt of qcd with chemical potential see @xcite . here we will comment on some recent developments relating to products of random matrices , see @xcite for a detailed review ( and the lectures of y. tourigny in this volume ) . the discretisation of derivatives on a space - time lattice is not a unique procedure , which also applies to the dirac operator in eq . ( [ dirac ] ) . we would thus first like to motivate why in this subsection we will study the modification proposed by wilson , the wilson dirac operator @xmath407 which is no longer anti - hermitian . here @xmath19 is the lattice spacing and @xmath408 denotes the laplace operator which is hermitian . of course both operators still have to be discretised . we can not possibly give justice to the vast literature on this subject and will only focus on aspects relevant for the application of rmt . the reason why wilson proposed to add the laplacian is the so - called doubler problem . in the continuum with @xmath409 the relativistic energy - momentum relation for a particle with mass @xmath410 , energy @xmath411 , and 4-momentum @xmath412 reads @xmath413 here we have spelled out the sum explicitly . particles satisfying this relation are called on - shell ( on the energy shell ) . after standard discretisation this relation becomes @xmath414 which in the limit @xmath20 leads back to eq . ( [ emom ] ) . in contrast to the continuum relation , here with any @xmath412 satisfying this equation also @xmath415 , @xmath416 etc . fulfil eq . ( [ emoma ] ) . in total we have @xmath417 possibilities to add @xmath418 to the components of @xmath412 , which all correspond to the same on - shell particle . this is the doubler problem . wilson s modification to add the laplacian to the dirac operator amounts to adding the term @xmath419 to the right hand side of eq . ( [ emoma ] ) . in the limit @xmath20 this makes the extra 15 particles heavy and thus removes the doublers . the modification comes with a prices , as the laplacian explicitly breaks chiral symmetry . we will not discuss other possibilities here , for example in @xcite for a rmt of the so - called staggered dirac operator , but rather stick to wilson s choice . despite the non - hermiticity of @xmath420 eq . ( [ wdirac ] ) it satisfies the so - called @xmath284-hermiticity : @xmath421 here we have simply used that @xmath422 and the anti - commutator from eq . ( [ dchiral ] ) . consequently one can define the following hermitian operator called @xmath423 @xmath424 where traditionally the quark mass @xmath425 is added to the definition . looking at eq . ( [ dchiral ] ) for the dirac operator and eq . ( [ gammas ] ) for @xmath284 we can immediately give the chiral block structure of @xmath420 and @xmath423 : @xmath426 here @xmath427 and @xmath428 are hermitian operators . note the change in sign in the mass term in the lower right block of @xmath423 . as previously for @xmath409 this immediately leads to a good ansatz to make for a wrmt , as it was made in @xcite . before we turn to analyse this in some detail let us directly go to the epsilon - regime of qcd in the wilson formulation at fixed topology , wechpt . it turns out that at lo 3 extra terms appear in the chiral lagrangian as was discussed in @xcite ( note the different sign convention ) . they contain 3 new low energy constants ( lec ) @xmath429 , @xmath430 and @xmath431 , and all terms are proportionally to @xmath432 : @xmath433}(\{\hat{m}\})&= & \int_{u(n_f ) } du_0\det[u_0]^\nu\exp\big[+\frac12 \sigma v\mbox{tr}({m}(u_0+u_0^\dag ) ) -a^2v w_8\mbox{tr}(u_0 ^ 2+u_0^{\dag\,2})\nonumber\\ & & \quad\quad\quad\quad\quad\quad\quad\quad\quad\quad\quad -a^2 vw_6(\mbox{tr}(u_0+u_0^\dag))^2-a^2 vw_7(\mbox{tr}(u_0-u_0^\dag))^2 \big]\ . \label{zwechpt}\end{aligned}\ ] ] it is clear that this implies the scaling @xmath434 or @xmath435 , in addition to the scaling of the quark masses with the volume in eq . ( [ exponenteps ] ) . let us discuss some simplifications first . without fixing topology in the special case of @xmath436 the term tr@xmath437 vanishes , and the terms proportional to @xmath431 and @xmath429 are equivalent . in general , in the second line of eq . ( [ zwechpt ] ) the 2 squares of the traces can be linearised by so - called hubbart - stratonovich transformations , at the expense of 2 extra gaussian integrals . the linearised terms can be included into a shift of the mass for @xmath429 , and into so - called axial mass terms @xmath438 for @xmath430 , see @xcite for more details . also for the latter term the corresponding group integral generalising eq . ( [ lsint ] ) is known , see @xcite . therefore in the following we will set @xmath439 , having in mind that we need to perform 2 extra integrals for the full partition function ( [ zwechpt ] ) for non - zero values of these lecs . let us define @xmath440 and compute the partition function only including this term . for @xmath248 we obtain @xmath441}(\hat{m})=\int_{-\pi}^\pi\frac{d\theta}{2\pi } e^{i\nu\theta+\hat{m}\cos(\theta)-4\hat{a}_8 ^ 2\cos(\theta)^2 + 2\hat{a}_8 ^ 2 } = e^{2\hat{a}_8 ^ 2}\int_{-\infty}^\infty \frac{dx}{\sqrt{\pi}}e^{-x^2}\left(\frac{\hat{m}-4ix\hat{a}_8}{\hat{m}+4ix\hat{a}_8}\right)^{-\frac{\nu}{2 } } i_\nu\left(\sqrt{\hat{m}^2 + 16x^2\hat{a}_8 ^ 2}\right ) . \label{zwechptnf1}\ ] ] it is no longer elementary , but after linearising the @xmath442 term it can be written as a gaussian integral over the one - flavour partition function @xmath443 in the continuum at shifted mass . for degenerate masses and general @xmath0 we can again diagonalise @xmath363 and use andrief s integral formula , as in the derivation of eq . ( [ zdeg ] ) , leading to : @xmath444}(\hat{m})=\det_{1\leq j , k\leq n_f}\left[e^{2\hat{a}_8 ^ 2 } \int_{-\pi}^\pi\frac{d\theta}{2\pi}\exp\left[i(\nu+k - j)\theta+\hat{m}\cos(\theta)-4\hat{a}_8 ^ 2\cos(\theta)^2\right]\right ] . \label{zwechptnf}\ ] ] once again it is given by the determinant of @xmath248 flavour partition functions . in order to determine the spectral density of @xmath423 or @xmath420 one then has to introduce additional auxiliary quark pairs as described in eq . ( [ qcdresolvent ] ) ( or use replicas ) . prior to the rmt calculation this was done for the spectral density from wechpt in @xcite , for both @xmath423 or @xmath420 . let us now turn to the rmt side as introduced in @xcite . for simplicity we will only consider the hermitian operator @xmath423 , for the discussion of the complex eigenvalue spectrum of @xmath420 we refer to @xcite and to @xcite for its complete solution . actually two slightly different rmt have been proposed , which have turned out to be equivalent on the level of the jpdf . in @xcite the partition function ( [ matrixrep ] ) was generalised using eq . ( [ dwchiral ] ) in an obvious way , by adding two hermitian gaussian matrices @xmath445 and @xmath313 of dimensions @xmath34 and @xmath56 , respectively : @xmath446}\sim\int[dw][da][db]\prod_{f=1}^{n_f}\det \left [ \begin{array}{cc } m_f 1_n+aa&i w\\ -iw^\dag & -m_f 1_{n+\nu}-ab\\ \end{array } \right ] \exp\left[-\frac14\mbox{tr}(a^2+b^2 + 2ww^\dag)\right ] . \label{wimatrixrep}\ ] ] in @xcite the following modification was made : rather than adding a block - diagonal hermitian matrix to @xmath423 as the last term in eq . ( [ dwchiral ] ) , a full hermitian matrix @xmath447 was added to it , @xmath448 , filling the off - diagonal blocks with a rectangular complex matrix @xmath449 ( and trivially changing the sign of @xmath450 ) : @xmath451}&=&\int[dw][dh]\prod_{f=1}^{n_f}\det \left [ \begin{array}{cc } m_f 1_n+a&i w+\omega\\ -iw^\dag + \omega^\dag&-m_f 1_{n+\nu}+b\\ \end{array } \right ] \exp\left[-\frac{1}{2(1-a^2)}\mbox{tr}ww^\dag-\frac{1}{4a^2}\mbox{tr}h^2\right],\nonumber\\ & & h=\left(\begin{array}{cc } a&\omega\\ \omega^\dag&b\\ \end{array}\right),\ \ a\in[0,1]\ . \label{wiimatrixrep}\end{aligned}\ ] ] the different rescaling of the variances with @xmath19 was made in @xcite to underline that on the level of rmt this corresponds to a two - matrix model that interpolates between the chgue and the gue , in the limits @xmath20 and @xmath452 , respectively . it was shown in @xcite and @xcite that in the limit @xmath32 , identifying @xmath453 in addition to the rescaled mass terms the two rmt partition functions and eq . ( [ zwechpt ] ) with @xmath454 agree : @xmath444}=\lim_{\stackrel{\mbox{\small $ n\to\infty$}}{\mbox{\small $ a , m_f\to0 $ } } } { \cal z}_{wi,\,n}^{[n_f]}= \lim_{\stackrel{\mbox{\small $ n\to\infty$}}{\mbox{\small $ a , m_f\to0 $ } } } { \cal z}_{wi\!i,\,n}^{[n_f]}\ . \label{wequiv}\ ] ] as we have said before the presence of the @xmath429- and @xmath430-terms can be achieved by 2 extra gaussian integrals , see @xcite . it is quite remarkable that rmt allows to include such a detailed structure of wchpt . the fact that we have `` only '' considered rmts for @xmath423 does not affect the equivalence argument of the partition functions . because of eq . ( [ d5 ] ) and @xmath455=1 $ ] the partition functions of @xmath420 and @xmath423 agree . let us just state the jpdf of the eigenvalues @xmath456 of @xmath423 for degenerate masses @xmath425 without derivation , see @xcite and @xcite for details , @xmath457}(m ) & \sim & \exp\big[\frac{nm^{2}}{2a^2(1-a^2)}\big ] \int_{-\infty}^\infty\prod_{j=1}^{2n+\nu } dd_jd_j^{n_f } \exp\big[{-\frac{d_j^2}{4a^2}}\big ] \delta_{2n+\nu}(\{d\})\ \ \ \ \nonumber\\ & & \times\mbox{pf}_{1\leq i , j\leq 2n+\nu;\,1\leq q\leq \nu } \left [ \begin{array}{cc } f(d_j - d_i ) & \!d_i^{\ , q-1}\exp\left[-\frac{d_im}{2a^2}\right]\\ -d_j^{\ , q-1}\exp\left[-\frac{d_jm}{2a^2}\right ] & { 0}\\ \end{array } \right]\ , \label{zdevpf}\end{aligned}\ ] ] where we have defined the antisymmetric weight @xmath458 \sinh\big[\frac{xu}{2a^2}\big].\ ] ] this jpdf has two new features . first , there appears a vandermonde times a pfaffian ( pf ) defined as @xmath459=\sqrt{\det[a]}$ ] for antisymmetric matrices @xmath445 of even dimension , see e.g. @xcite for a definition in terms of permutations . this is quite common for such interpolating two - matrix models , see @xcite for classical works regarding the gue - goe and the gue - gse transitions . second , and most importantly the solution for the correlation functions involves both skew op and op at the same time , where the op are hermite polynomials of a gue of size @xmath460 . we refer to @xcite for details , in particular that this sub - structure of a finite size gue remains valid in the large-@xmath34 limit . in @xcite where only the cases @xmath227 and 1 were solved this structure was not observed , because only hermite polynomials of degree 0 and 1 occur . instead of giving any further details of the solution of wrmt we show plots in figure [ fig : wbessel ] below for the limiting quenched microscopic density @xmath461 of @xmath423 for @xmath212 , illustrating the effect of the rescaled finite lattice spacing @xmath462 . in order to compare to the results from the chgue in figure [ fig : besseldensity ] let us first discuss the difference between @xmath423 and @xmath22 at @xmath409 , where @xmath463 , see eqs . ( [ wdirac ] ) and ( [ d5 ] ) . the rotation with @xmath284 merely makes the dirac operator hermitian rather than anti - hermitian , which corresponds to rotating the eigenvalues from the imaginary to the real axis ( as we had already done in writing the jpdf in eq . ( [ partitionfunct ] ) of real eigenvalues ) . the shift by @xmath464 however introduces a gap such that there are no eigenvalues of @xmath423 in @xmath465 $ ] . furthermore , the @xmath24 exact zero eigenvalues which are not shown in figure [ fig : besseldensity ] get moved away from the origin to one of the edges of this gap , which in our convention is at @xmath466 . therefore we now have to give the density on @xmath111 instead of @xmath112 , and it holds for @xmath25 : @xmath467 the effect of @xmath468 is both to broaden the @xmath24 delta - functions and to eventually fill the gap @xmath469 $ ] . because eigenvalues repel each other the @xmath24 zero - modes will now spread , and form approximately a gue of finite size @xmath24 , see @xcite for a further discussion . in order to make the comparison more transparent let us also choose @xmath470 , so that we can plot the density on @xmath112 only , as is shown in figure [ fig : wbessel ] . the effect of @xmath468 is particularly striking on the zero - modes . ( 12.2,5.5 ) for @xmath227 ( left ) and @xmath264 ( right ) as a function of @xmath471 , taken from @xcite . because of choosing @xmath470 it is still symmetric around the origin . for @xmath472 we are back to the microscopic density of bessel functions as in figure [ fig : besseldensity ] , whereas for @xmath473 ( blue ) and @xmath474 ( red ) the density starts to spread into the region around the origin . for @xmath264 the delta - function of the one zero - eigenvalue is broadened by increasing @xmath471 - which is why this is plotted on a different scale compared to @xmath227 . at these small values of @xmath471 the effect on the density is remarkably localised to the origin . only in the limit @xmath475 we will arrive at the microscopic density of the gue @xcite which is completely flat ( and normalised to @xmath476 here ) . [ fig : wbessel],title="fig:",width=264 ] for @xmath227 ( left ) and @xmath264 ( right ) as a function of @xmath471 , taken from @xcite . because of choosing @xmath470 it is still symmetric around the origin . for @xmath472 we are back to the microscopic density of bessel functions as in figure [ fig : besseldensity ] , whereas for @xmath473 ( blue ) and @xmath474 ( red ) the density starts to spread into the region around the origin . for @xmath264 the delta - function of the one zero - eigenvalue is broadened by increasing @xmath471 - which is why this is plotted on a different scale compared to @xmath227 . at these small values of @xmath471 the effect on the density is remarkably localised to the origin . only in the limit @xmath475 we will arrive at the microscopic density of the gue @xcite which is completely flat ( and normalised to @xmath476 here ) . [ fig : wbessel],title="fig:",width=264 ] ( 0.1,-0.2)@xmath265 ( -7.1,-0.2)@xmath265 ( -10.8,3.5)@xmath461 ( -3.5,1.4)@xmath461 the density of the hermitian wilson dirac operator @xmath423 has been compared to quenched lattice simulations in @xcite . because this involves multi - parameter fits several quantities have been proposed that are simple to measure @xcite . a comparison to unquenched data remains a difficult question , see however @xcite . the rmt approach presented here has also lead to insights about the sign and constraints amongst the lecs @xmath477 that were previously controversial @xcite . when the lattice artefacts become very strong additional unphysical phases appear , and the possibility to access these as a function of the lec and quark content @xmath0 was clarified in @xcite . the derivation of all @xmath62-point correlation functions including @xmath478 based on wechpt has been pushed forward in @xcite , leading to alternative representations compared to the op approach @xcite . for the density of @xmath423 in the @xmath373-regime see @xcite . the computation of individual eigenvalue distribution is not known beyond the expansion of the fredholm expansion proposed in @xcite . in this subsection we will study the influence of a chemical potential @xmath10 on the dirac operator spectrum . we will first state its global symmetry in qcd , then construct the rmt and at the end link to the epsilon - regime of the corresponding chiral lagrangian . the addition of a chemical potential @xmath479 for each quark flavour to the qcd action in eq . ( [ zqcd ] ) amounts to add the terms @xmath480 . in classical statistical mechanics the addition of a chemical potential allows the number of the corresponding particles to fluctuate . here we will add the same chemical potential @xmath481 to all flavours ( which makes it the baryon chemical potential ) . in analogy to eq . ( [ dchiral ] ) the global symmetry of the dirac operator plus @xmath482 changes to @xmath483 and thus becomes complex non - hermitian . it holds that @xmath484 , and thus for purely imaginary chemical potential @xmath485 it is still anti - hermitian . because the operator remains chiral @xmath486 the non - zero complex eigenvalues continue to come in pairs @xmath487 , using the same argument as after eq . ( [ eigenfunct ] ) . the fact that the spectrum of the dirac operator with chemical potential is complex ( and thus the qcd action too ) has severe repercussions for lattice qcd . because the action can no longer be interpreted as a probability weight , the standard method on the lattice , weighting a given configuration by its action breaks down . several methods have been invented to circumvent this so - called sign problem , and we refer to @xcite for a review . in contrast the rmt for qcd with chemical potential remains analytically solvable with op in the complex plane , as we will see . in @xcite a rmt was constructed by stephanov where @xmath298 was replaced by a complex gaussian random matrix @xmath488 , cf . ( [ matrixrep ] ) for @xmath47 compared to ( [ dchiral ] ) . while this rmt was very useful to illuminate the difference between @xmath25 and @xmath88 , which is more dramatic than for @xmath489 , this model was not analytically tractable with op at finite-@xmath34 . therefore osborn @xcite introduced a two - matrix model where @xmath10 is multiplied by a second random matrix @xmath490 , see eq . ( [ 2matrixrep ] ) below , implying that the chemical potential term is not diagonal in that basis . while at first sight more complicated this model turns out to be exactly solvable using op in the complex plane , as we will demonstrate . a further equivalent representation was chosen in @xcite , multiplying @xmath491 by @xmath492 $ ] instead . this parametrisation allowed to understand , why the sign problem in the numerical solution of this rmt for qcd with @xmath493 can be circumvented @xcite . prior to introducing an rmt with @xmath10 as in eq . ( [ dchiralmu ] ) a similar model was introduced @xcite describing the effect of temperature @xmath13 . such a model can only be solved using the supersymmetric method , see @xcite , with the effect of renormalising @xmath494 to be temperature dependent , keeping the correlation functions otherwise unchanged . a further modification of stephanov s model by including both parameters @xmath495 in eq . ( [ dchiralmu ] ) was very successful as a schematic model for the phase diagram of qcd @xcite , predicting the qualitative features depicted in figure [ fig : phasediag ] . let us turn to the rmt @xcite defined as @xmath496[dw_2]\prod_{f=1}^{n_f}\det \left [ \begin{array}{cc } m_f 1_n&i w_1+\mu w_2\\ iw_1^\dag + \mu w_2^\dag & m_f 1_{n+\nu}\\ \end{array } \right ] \exp[-\mbox{tr}(w_1w_1^\dag + w_2w_2^\dag)]\nonumber\\ & \sim & \int[dx_1][dx_2]\prod_{f=1}^{n_f}\det \left [ \begin{array}{cc } m_f 1_n&x_1\\ x_2&m_f 1_{n+\nu}\\ \end{array } \right ] \exp\left[-a(\mu)\mbox{tr}(x_1x_1^\dag + x_2x_2^\dag)\right]\nonumber\\ & & \quad\quad\quad \times\exp\left[b(\mu)\mbox{tr}(x_1x_2+x_2^\dag x_1^\dag)\right]\ , \ \ a(\mu)=\frac{1+\mu^2}{4\mu^2}\ , \ \ b(\mu)=\frac{1-\mu^2}{4\mu^2}\ . \label{2matrixrep}\end{aligned}\ ] ] in the second step we have simply changed variables to the matrices @xmath497 and @xmath498 which are now coupled . while at @xmath499 the matrices @xmath500 and @xmath501 are again independent gaussian random matrices - this is called maximal non - hermiticity - at @xmath489 we have @xmath502 with total correlation ( and we are back to the chgue ) . a look at the characteristic equation for the massless rmt dirac operator , @xmath503=\det[z^2-x_1x_2]\ , \label{muchar}\ ] ] reveals that we are after the complex eigenvalues in this setting see @xcite . ] of the product of the two correlated matrices @xmath504 . as in eq . ( [ matrixrep ] ) we could have allowed for real or quaternion valued matrix elements with @xmath67 . however , the joint density of complex eigenvalues does not enjoy a closed form for all 3 @xmath63 s as in eq . ( [ partitionfunct ] ) . in particular real matrices are special as they can have real eigenvalues and complex conjugated eigenvalues pairs , as the characteristic equation ( [ muchar ] ) is real . for the solution of the respective rmts see @xcite and @xcite , respectively . the parametrisation of a generic complex non - hermitian matrix @xmath505 in terms of its complex eigenvalues is usually done using the schur decomposition @xmath506 , where @xmath507 is unitary , @xmath508 contains the complex eigenvalues , and @xmath13 is a strictly upper triangular complex matrix ( it can be chosen to be strictly lower triangular instead ) . for two matrices however , in order to compute the jacobian we have to use the following generalised schur decomposition @xcite @xmath509 with @xmath510 and @xmath511 . here are unitary , @xmath513 are diagonal matrices with complex entries ( which are not the complex eigenvalues of @xmath500 and @xmath501 ) , and @xmath514 are strictly upper triangular . the complex eigenvalues of the product matrix @xmath505 are thus given by the elements of the diagonal matrix @xmath515 . let us directly give the result for the joint density from @xcite ( see @xcite for an alternative derivation ) : @xmath516}&= & \left(\prod_{j=1}^n\int d^2z_j|z_j|^{\nu}k_\nu(a(\mu)|z_j|)\exp\left[-\frac{b(\mu)}{2}(z_j+z_j^*)\right]\prod_{f=1}^{n_f}(z_j+m_f^2)\right ) |\delta_n(\{z\})|^2 \label{zrmtmu } \\ & = & \left(\prod_{j=1}^n\int d^2z_j\right ) { \cal p}_{jpdf}(z_1,\ldots , z_n)\ . \label{jpdfmu}\end{aligned}\ ] ] note that in view of eq . ( [ muchar ] ) we should later take the square root of the eigenvalues @xmath517 of @xmath504 to change to dirac operator eigenvalues . in the complex plane this is not unique and without loss of generality one can then restrict to the half - plane , also in view of the @xmath518 pairs of dirac eigenvalues . before we discuss the properties of eq . ( [ zrmtmu ] ) and its correlation functions let us try to understand why the jacobian of the transformation ( [ schur ] ) does not only include the modulus squared vandermonde determinant ( as in the complex ginibre ensemble , see @xcite ) and the zero - modes @xmath519 , but also a modified @xmath520-bessel function , even though we started from ( coupled ) gaussian matrices . the same phenomenon happens when looking at products of complex gaussian random variables @xmath521 , and asking for the distribution @xmath522 of the product random variable @xmath523 : @xmath524\delta^{(2)}(z - z_1z_2)=(2\pi)^2 \int_0^\infty \frac{drr}{r^2}\exp[-r^2-|z|^2/r^2]= 2\pi k_0(2|z|)\ . \label{kweight}\ ] ] obviously we are dealing with the analogue of quadratic matrices here . multiplying @xmath525 such random variables we obtain an @xmath526-fold integral representation for the distribution of @xmath527 now given by a meijer g - function : @xmath528 see @xcite for its standard definition . these weights appear when studying the complex eigenvalues of the product of @xmath136 independent gaussian matrices @xmath529 and we refer to @xcite for the solution of this model . the complex eigenvalue correlation functions of the model ( [ zrmtmu ] ) are defined as in eq . ( [ rk ] ) and it holds @xmath530\ . \label{rkc}\ ] ] they are again given in terms of the kernel @xmath531 of polynomials @xmath532 and @xmath533 which are bi - orthogonal in the complex plane with respect to the weight @xmath534\prod_{f=1}^{n_f}(z_j+m_f^2)\ , \label{muweight}\\ & & \ \ \int d^2z\ w(z ) p_k(z)q_l(z)=h_k\delta_{kl}\ . \label{opc}\end{aligned}\ ] ] we will not discuss gap probabilities or individual eigenvalue distributions here and refer to @xcite . unlike in the real eigenvalue case they will now depend on the choice of the geometry of the region containing @xmath535 eigenvalues , and only in the rotationally invariant case @xmath499 a radial ordering of eigenvalues according to their modulus provides a natural choice . before we solve the rmt eq . ( [ zrmtmu ] ) a word of caution is in order . in standard op theory in the complex plane only real positive weights are considered , which is only true for @xmath25 in eq . ( [ muweight ] ) . in this case @xmath536 and standard techniques as gram - schmidt apply to construct these polynomials , see e.g. @xcite . when @xmath88 in our case the weight is complex , and thus a priori the partition function is as well as the @xmath537 are . therefore the density no longer has a probabilistic interpretation , it has a real and imaginary part , and we refer to @xcite for a more detailed discussion . we will first provide the solution of the simplest quenched case with @xmath25 . then the partition function and general eigenvalue correlation functions including @xmath0 mass terms can be obtained along the same lines as in section [ opdirac ] , expressing them in terms of the op at @xmath25 . surprisingly , despite the complicated non - gaussian weight function in the complex plane the op are again given by laguerre polynomials of complex arguments @xcite . ) was made in @xcite . ] the following holds , where we drop the argument @xmath10 of the parameters @xmath538 in eq . ( [ 2matrixrep ] ) : @xmath539 l_j^\nu(cz)l_k^\nu(cz)=\delta_{jk}h_k\ , \ \mbox{with } \ \ c=\frac{a^2-b^2}{2b}\ , \ \ \label{opmu}\ ] ] here @xmath540 is an integer , and the laguerre polynomials can be made monic as in eq . ( [ laguerre ] ) . the proof we sketch follows @xcite and uses induction of depth 2 , for an earlier longer proof see @xcite . insert the following integral representations into the orthogonality relation ( [ opmu ] ) for @xmath212 , @xmath541\ , \nonumber\\ l_j^{\nu}(z)&=&\oint_\gamma \frac{du}{2\pi } \frac{\exp\left[-\frac{zu}{1-u}\right]}{(1-u)^{\nu+1}u^{j+1}}\ , \label{cintrep}\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath542 is a contour enclosing the origin in positive direction , but not the point @xmath543 . then the gaussian integrals over the real and imaginary parts of @xmath544 can be solved , and subsequently the integral over @xmath545 from the @xmath520-bessel function . the orthogonality then easily follows applying the residue theorem twice . for the induction we use the 3-step recurrence relation for the laguerre polynomials and @xmath520-bessel function @xcite , see @xcite for details . we thus have solved the quenched case as we know all correlation functions from the kernel @xmath546 in terms of the quantities in eq . ( [ opmu ] ) , by using eq . ( [ rkc ] ) . a similar solution exists @xcite for the so - called elliptic complex ginibre ensemble of a single complex matrix @xmath547 , where the hermitian part @xmath548 and anti - hermitian part @xmath549 of the matrix have different variances that depend on a parameter . the solution is given in term of hermite polynomials in the complex plane and allows to interpolate between the gue and the complex ginibre ensemble at maximal non - hermiticity , where @xmath447 and @xmath445 have the same variance . we refer to @xcite for a detailed discussion . let us now turn to the unquenched solution with @xmath88 described in great detail in @xcite , expressing everything in terms of the laguerre polynomials of the quenched solution from eq . ( [ opmu ] ) . because we follow the same strategy as in subsections [ genweight ] and [ alllaguerre ] using expectation values of characteristic polynomials we can be very brief . the corresponding proofs for manipulating expectation values of characteristic polynomials and their complex conjugates defined as in eq . ( [ ave ] ) can be found in @xcite . in particular for the monic op in the complex plane satisfying eq . ( [ opc ] ) for a weight @xmath522 that can be complex we have @xcite @xmath550 the proof goes exactly the same way as in eq . ( [ proofpn ] ) , where for @xmath551 we multiply the product into @xmath552 , increasing it to @xmath553 . for @xmath554 we simply choose @xmath555 , increasing it to @xmath556 . likewise for the kernel we obtain @xmath557 modifying the proof in eq . ( [ proofkernel ] ) accordingly by multiplying the first product into @xmath558 , and the second into @xmath559 . the only difference here is that in general no christoffel - darboux formula is available . this is despite the fact that the laguerre polynomials in our example eq . ( [ opmu ] ) still satisfy the standard 3-step recurrence ( which is not true for op in the complex plane in general ) . the step in the proof of eq . ( [ cd ] ) that breaks down is the cancellation of the summands after multiplying eq . ( [ clagkernel ] ) by @xmath560 . the most general result corresponding to eq . ( [ prodchar ] ) now contains both products of @xmath520 characteristic polynomials and of @xmath126 products of complex conjugated ones . without loss of generality let us choose @xmath561 ( @xmath562 can be obtained by complex conjugation ) , to state the result from @xcite : @xmath563 . \label{cprodchar}\ ] ] here the left block of kernels inside the determinant is of size @xmath564 . the proof is straightforward and uses induction . using this result we are now ready to compute the partition function eq . ( [ zrmtmu ] ) for general @xmath565 . in the quenched case it is given again by @xmath185 times the products of the norms from eq . ( [ opmu ] ) , as derived in eq . ( [ znorm ] ) . for @xmath88 we can express it in terms of the laguerre polynomials from eq . ( [ opmu ] ) , and obtain an almost identical answer to eq . ( [ zmassive ] ) : @xmath173}(\{m\})=%z_n^{[n_f=0]}\left\langle \prod_{l=1}^n\prod_{f=1}^{n_f}(z_l+m_f^2)\right\rangle_n&= & \frac{(-1)^{nn_f}n!\prod_{j=0}^{n-1}h_j}{\delta_{n_f}(\{m\ } ) } \det_{1\leq j , g\leq n_f}\left[(-1/c)^{n+g-1}(n+g-1)!l^\nu_{n+g-1}(-cm_f^2)\right ] . \label{zmassivec}\ ] ] as in eq . ( [ zmassive ] ) it is given by a determinant of laguerre polynomials of real arguments which are real . the only difference to @xmath489 is the scale factor @xmath566 and the @xmath10-dependence inside the norms @xmath567 from eq . ( [ opmu ] ) . we will not give further details regarding the kernel @xmath568}(z , u^*)$ ] constituting the @xmath62-point correlation functions in eq . ( [ rkc ] ) . following the first line of eq . ( [ kernelmassive ] ) it can be expressed through the quenched average of @xmath569 characteristic polynomials times one conjugated characteristic polynomial , divided by the partition function from eq . ( [ zmassivec ] ) . the spectral density with @xmath0 masses then follows as in eq . ( [ r1massive ] ) , by multiplying @xmath568}(z , z^*)$ ] with the weight eq . ( [ muweight ] ) , see @xcite for more details . clearly it is not real in general . we will now very briefly discuss the large-@xmath34 limit and matching with the corresponding echpt . it turns out that for non - hermitian matrices that are coupled as in eq . ( [ 2matrixrep ] ) the possibility of taking such limits is much richer than in the hermitian ( or maximally non - hermitian ) case . in addition to the standard macroscopic and microscopic statistics a further class of limits exist , where the matrix @xmath504 becomes almost hermitian , taking the parameter @xmath570 at such a rate that that the following products @xmath571 are constant . here the scaling of the complex eigenvalues ( and masses ) is unchanged compared to eq . ( [ rmtmass ] ) . this limit was first observed in the elliptic complex ginibre ensemble already mentioned @xcite and called weakly non - hermitian @xcite . this is in contrast to the limit at strong non - hermiticity where @xmath572 $ ] is kept fixed and a different scaling of @xmath527 is chosen . here the statistics of the product of two independent complex matrices with @xmath499 is found , see @xcite and @xcite for details . looking at our result eq . ( [ zmassivec ] ) it is clear that the limiting partition function is the same as for @xmath489 in eq . ( [ zrmtnf ] ) and is thus independent of the rescaled @xmath573 . in contrast already the limiting quenched density does depend on @xmath573 . it can be easily obtained from eq . ( [ clagkernel ] ) , replacing the sum by an integral and using eq . ( [ laguerrelim ] ) for the laguerre polynomials , @xmath574\int_0 ^ 1 dtt \exp[-2 t^2\hat{\mu}^2]|j_\nu(\tilde{z}t)|^2\ . \label{cdensity}\ ] ] it is shown in figure [ fig : besselc ] . here we have again changed to dirac eigenvalues following @xcite . this result was obtained earlier using replicas and the toda equation in @xcite . for @xmath575 the integral becomes elementary and matches eq . ( [ besseldensity ] ) , while the prefactors turn into a delta - function . ( 12.2,5.5 ) ) as a function of @xmath576 for @xmath227 ( left ) and @xmath264 ( right ) , at @xmath577 . the density of real eigenvalues from figure [ fig : besseldensity ] can still be recognised , it now spreads into the complex plane . because in the limit @xmath578 it will become proportionally to a delta - function @xmath579 times the bessel density the vertical scale is different . [ fig : besselc],title="fig:",width=264 ] ) as a function of @xmath576 for @xmath227 ( left ) and @xmath264 ( right ) , at @xmath577 . the density of real eigenvalues from figure [ fig : besseldensity ] can still be recognised , it now spreads into the complex plane . because in the limit @xmath578 it will become proportionally to a delta - function @xmath579 times the bessel density the vertical scale is different . [ fig : besselc],title="fig:",width=264 ] ( -5.1,0.8)@xmath265 ( -1.0,1.3)@xmath580 ( -12.1,0.8)@xmath265 ( -8.0,1.3)@xmath580 ( -7.0,4.4)@xmath581 ( -14.0,4.4)@xmath581 the fact that the partition function is @xmath573-independent and the density is not has been called the `` silver blaze problem '' @xcite , alluding to a novel by a.c . doyle . how can we resolve this puzzle ? let us look again at chpt , the theory of goldstone bosons . because these are mesons they do nt carry baryon charge and thus do not feel the effect of adding @xmath10 to the action ( mesons consist of a quark and anti - quark whereas baryons , as the proton , of 3 quarks ) . we can still make the chpt partition function @xmath10-dependent by adding an integer number @xmath582 of quarks with the opposite chemical potential @xmath583 . as discussed after eq . ( [ dchiralmu ] ) this amounts to add complex conjugated determinants of the dirac operator to the action , leading to @xmath584}(\{m\},\{n\})= z_n \left\langle \prod_{l=1}^n\left(\prod_{i=1}^{n_f}(z_l+m_f)\right)\left(\prod_{j=1}^{n_f^*}(z_l^*+n_f^2)\right)\right\rangle_n\ , \label{zrmtmix}\ ] ] which we can also compute using eq . ( [ cprodchar ] ) . the corresponding limiting partion function of echpt now does depend on @xmath10 as follows : @xmath585}(\{m\},\{n\})=\int_{u(n_f+n_f^ * ) } du_0\det[u_0]^\nu\exp\left[\frac12 \sigma v\mbox{tr}({m}(u_0+u_0^\dag))-\frac14\mu^2 vf_\pi^2[u_0,b][u_0,b]\right ] . \label{zechptmu}\ ] ] here @xmath586 contains both kinds of masses and @xmath587 is the metric with the signature of the chemical potentials . the commutator comes from the fact that in the dirac operator @xmath10 acts as an additional vector potential . it obviously vanishes at @xmath588 . once again in the limit the partition functions from rmt and echpt agree , when identifying the rescaled masses and chemical potentials as @xmath589 : @xmath590}(\{m\},\{n\})={\cal z}_{\rm echpt}^{[n_f+n_f^*]}(\{\hat{m}\},\{\hat{n}\}).\ ] ] they are given by the determinant from eq . ( [ cprodchar ] ) in terms of the limiting kernel and the limiting polynomials which are again @xmath443 . the corresponding group integral eq . ( [ zechptmu ] ) was computed independently in @xcite using an explicit parametrisation of @xmath591 , see @xcite for the general @xmath0 case . what about the equivalence of rmt and echpt for the density , in other words how can we generate the spectral density eq . ( [ cdensity ] ) from a chiral lagrangian ? although one may still define and generate the resolvent as in eq . ( [ resolvent ] ) , the relation to the spectral density changes compared to eq . ( [ inversion ] ) : @xmath592 due to @xmath593 on @xmath594 . while it is subtle to extract the non - holomorphic part from the expectation value of the ratio of characteristic polynomials two alternative ways exist to formulate the generation of a two - dimensional delta - function . one way is to use so - called replicas which amounts to introduce @xmath62 extra pairs of complex conjugated quarks in the chiral lagrangian . using the relation to the toda lattice equation , the replica limit can be made well defined as was developed in @xcite . the generating function for the density with @xmath595 , @xmath596}$ ] on the echpt side thus depends on @xmath573 , which is why the resulting density also depends on it . the second possibility is to use supersymmetry , which will also involve pairs of complex conjugated bosons @xcite , @xmath597}{\det[(u - d\!\!\!\!/(\mu))(u - d\!\!\!\!/(\mu))^\dag+\kappa^2]}\right\rangle_\nu^{\rm qcd}\right|_{u = z}\right)\ , \label{susyresmu}\ ] ] and both methods have been shown to be equivalent @xcite . in either case the silver blaze puzzle is resolved . we would also like to mention the papers @xcite where averages of ratios of characteristic polynomials and their complex conjugates were evaluated in a purely complex op framework . the most prominent example for such an average is the distribution of the phase of @xmath598 @xmath599}\ , \label{phase}\ ] ] and we refer to @xcite and @xcite for a detailed discussion including its physical interpretation . when trying to compare the rmt predictions to qcd lattice simulations the presence of the chemical potential also has a virtue , despite the sign problem : it couples to the second lec in the chiral lagrangian , @xmath337 , in eq . ( [ zechptmu ] ) . just as for @xmath26 a fit of the density to lattice data helps to determine @xmath8 , a two - parameter fit at @xmath600 allows to measure @xmath337 in this way . because for imaginary chemical potential @xmath601 the dirac operator spectrum remains real as discussed after eq . ( [ dchiralmu ] ) , this was proposed to determine @xmath337 using standard lattice simulations @xcite . there is also a corresponding two - matrix model @xcite which in the large-@xmath34 with rescaled @xmath601 as in eq . ( [ weaklim ] ) becomes equal to eq . ( [ zechptmu ] ) , with @xmath602 ( which is of course still convergent ) . turning back to real chemical potential most comparisons were done within the quenched approximation , starting with @xcite , cf . @xcite for the influence of topology . despite the difficulty of defining individual eigenvalue distributions these were compared with in @xcite . there are many issues that we have not discussed about the application to qcd with chemical potential , apart from methods different from the op approach mentioned above . this includes the different origin of chiral symmetry breaking at @xmath603 that is strongly related to the oscillatory behaviour of the unquenched density and we refer to @xcite and to @xcite for a review . thanks to its analytical solution the rmt eq . ( [ zrmtmu ] ) has been used as a testing ground for numerical ways to solve the sign problem . this has been successful for the rmt itself and is reported in @xcite . furthermore , the study of the singular values of the qcd dirac operator with chemical potential has been proposed in @xcite , that could also be used to analyse different phases ( not depicted in figure [ fig : phasediag ] ) for larger values of @xmath10 . here both the lattice realisation and the rmt have many open questions , and a first step in rmt has been taken in @xcite . here a different kernel is found at the origin , the so - called meijer g - kernel @xcite that generalises the bessel kernel . the mathematical question of universality in the limit of weak non - hermiticity for non - gaussian rmts is still open at the moment , despite first heuristic attempts @xcite . for a further discussion including all known limiting kernels in this weak non - hermiticity limit resulting from gaussian models we refer to @xcite and references therein . let us briefly summarise the lessons we have learned in these lectures . the theory of orthogonal polynomials on the real line and in the complex plane and their properties has been extensively discussed . a particular focus was put on weights including characteristic polynomials , as this allowed us to determine the dirac operator spectrum of qcd including the contribution of @xmath0 quarks flavours in a random matrix approach . based on the global symmetries of qcd we have taken a limit to the low energy regime that eventually leads to a random matrix description in a controlled approximation , to which corrections can be computed . even though this is an unphysical limit it can be compared to numerical solutions of qcd on the lattice . this leads to a determination of the low energy constants of the theory and tests of lattice algorithms to be used then in the physical regime . we have shown how the introduction of more details in the theory of qcd such as the effect of finite lattice spacing or of chemical potential , that make the eigenvalues complex , modify the spectrum . and we have mentioned several open problems relevant for rmt and for its application like the computation of new correlation functions or the proof of universality for existing results . they hopefully contribute to keep this an interesting and lively area of research for both mathematicians and theoretical physicists . + acknowledgements : it has been a great pleasure to be back in les houches , now as a lecturer , and i would like to express my sincere gratitude to the organisers for inviting me . my understanding of this subject would not have been possible without the many collaborations on this topic , and i would like to thank all my coworkers for sharing their insights and compassion . i am particularly thankful to jac verbaarschot for many valuable comments on a first draft of this manuscript . furthermore i would like to thank the simons center for geometry and physics at stony brook university ( programme on statistical mechanics and combinatorics 2016 ) for the kind hospitality where part of these lecture notes were written up . this work was partly supported by dfg grant ak 35/2 - 1 . f. basile and g. akemann , jhep * 0712 * ( 2007 ) 043 [ arxiv:0710.0376 [ hep - th ] ] . c. lehner and t. wettig , jhep * 0911 * ( 2009 ) 005 [ arxiv:0909.1489 [ hep - lat ] ] . g. akemann , f. basile and l. lellouch , jhep * 0812 * ( 2008 ) 069 [ arxiv:0804.3809 [ hep - lat ] ] . Abstract:

Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.

Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered . Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video . Paper: this article will be about discussing the possibilities to characterize _ randomness _ and _ dynamical complexity _ in quantum mechanics and relating this issue to the questions of non - equilibrium statistical mechanics . we shall try to illustrate , mainly by presenting various numerical examples , a possible ` cyclist approach ' @xcite towards the _ quantum many - body problem _ which is inspired by experiences gained in studies of quantum and classical chaos of one or few particles ( see e.g. @xcite ) . solving the many body problem in quantum mechanics presents a major challenge from its very beginnings . and along this way , many ingenious important analytical and efficient numerical methods of solution have been developed , for example bethe ansatz @xcite , later generalized and interpreted as the quantum inverse scattering problem @xcite , real space renormalization group methods @xcite , quantum monte carlo @xcite , density matrix renormalization group ( dmrg ) @xcite , and more recently various quantum information - theoretic based time - dependent dmrg ( tdmrg ) @xcite . the ultimate aim of any of these methods is to efficiently find analytical or numerical approximation to the solution for some of the physical observables in the quantum many body problem , however many methods work only under some specific conditions which are not always well understood . for example , bethe ansatz and quantum inverse scattering work only for a small subset of problems which are _ completely integrable _ , and which may often have very non - generic non - equilibrium properties , such as e.g. ballistic transport at high temperatures @xcite . quantum monte carlo techniques represent a very successful set of numerical methods which can yield thermodynamic equilibrium averages for generic ( non - integrable ) systems , however they are practically useless for computing non - equilibrium , or time dependent quantities , such as transport coefficients . traditional dmrg method @xcite is provably very successful for computing accurate ground state expectation values of almost any physical observables of one - dimensional interacting systems . and tdmrg @xcite promised to extend the success of dmrg to time dependent physics . indeed , the first numerical experiments looked very promising , but after a closer look one may realize that they have all been applied to a rather special subset of interacting systems and to a rather special subset of initial states . for generic ( non - integrable ) interacting systems or for sufficiently complex initial states , tdmrg should fail to provide an efficient computation as shall be discussed below . in our view this is to be expected , and represents an intrinsic characteristic of quantum complexity of such system and should correspond to many body extensions of the phenomena of quantum chaos @xcite where spectra and eigenvector coefficients can be described by statistical ensembles of random matrices . in the past two , almost three decades there has been a lot of activity in the so called field of quantum chaos , or quantum chaology @xcite , where people were trying to understand the essential and significant features of quantum systems which behave chaotically in the classical limit . classical chaos can be defined in terms of positive ( algorithmic , kolmogorov - chaitin ) complexity of systems orbits . still , the question whether such definition of complexity can be in an intuitively sensible way translated to quantum mechanics failed to be answered in spite of many efforts . it seems that quantum systems of finite ( one or few body ) chaotic systems are generically more robust against imperfections @xcite than their classical counterparts , which is consistent with a simple illustration based on wave - stability of unitary quantum time evolution @xcite . nevertheless , it has been suggested that exponential sensitivity to initial conditions , the essential characteristics of classically chaotic systems , has many fingerprints in quantum mechanics . for example , in one of the pioneering works on quantum loschmidt echoes ( or fidelity decay ) , jalabert and pastawski @xcite have shown that in the semi - classical regime , decay of system s sensitivity to external perturbation , as defined by fidelity , is exponential with the rate which can be related to classical lyapunov exponents . however , this is only true in sufficiently semi - classical regime , where effective planck constant is smaller than effective strength of perturbation , and where fidelity can be essentially explained classically @xcite . on the other hand , in purely quantum regimes , quantum fidelity decays in completely different manner than the classical fidelity , and quite surprisingly displays slower decay for systems with stronger decay of temporal correlations @xcite . throughout this paper we shall discuss various ergodic properties of a simple toy model of non - integrable interacting quantum many body system , namely kicked ising ( ki ) chain @xcite , and its time - independent version , which ( both ) undergo a transition from integrable to quantum chaotic regimes when the direction of the ( kicking ) magnetic field is changed . by simulating the dynamics of the model in terms of tdmrg we find that it can be performed efficiently only in the integrable regimes . being interested in statistical mechanics of the model we shall describe numerical experiments addressing the questions on the relationship between the onset of quantum chaos in ki model and its quantum mixing property , namely the nature of relaxation to equilibrium , and the properties of non - equilibrium steady state . on one hand we argue that the regime of quantum chaos essentially corresponds to the regime of quantum ergodicity and quantum mixing where diffusive transport laws are valid . on the other hand , we conjecture that the transition to non - ergodic regime may occur before the system parameters reach the integrable point ( even in thermodynamic limit ) , and that non - ergodic to ergodic transition can be characterized with order parameters which change discontinuously at a critical value of system parameter . we argue that the process of relaxation to equilibrium in quantum chaotic ( mixing ) case can be described in terms of quantum analogues of ruelle resonances @xcite . furthermore , we conjecture that the eigenvectors of this process possess a certain scale invariance which can be described by simple power laws . we also discuss a possibility of numerical calculation of quantum dynamical entropies @xcite in a non - trivial setting of ki model , and find , quite remarkably , that positivity of such dynamical entropies _ does not correspond _ to any other measures of quantum chaos , namely quantum dynamical entropies appear to be positive even in the integrable regimes . about two thirds of the material presented in this paper constitutes a review of a selection of recent results related to quantum chaos in many - body systems , with a flavor of quantum information . however , about one third of the material , constituting a major part of section [ sect : statmech ] , is new and original and has not yet been published before . the paper is organized as follows . in short section [ sect : definitions ] we review basic definitions of complete integrability and quantum chaos , in particular in the context of many - body systems . in section [ sect : model ] we introduce ki model which will serve us as a very convenient and efficient toy model to numerically demonstrate all the phenomena discussed in this paper . in section [ sect : losch ] we discuss the robustness of quantum systems to external perturbations and decoherence in open quantum systems , mainly as characterized by quantum loschmidt echoes and entanglement between the system and the environment . in section [ sect : mps ] we discuss the time efficiency of best ( known ) classical simulation , namely using tdmrg , of locally interacting 1d quantum systems and its possible dependence on integrability of the model . in section [ sect : transport ] we relate standard criteria of quantum chaos to normal ( diffusive ) versus anomalous ( ballistic ) transport and discuss a simulation of a quantum heat current in non - equilibrium steady state . in section [ sect : statmech ] we discuss a problem of quantum relaxation to equilibrium , i.e. the quantum mixing property , and quantitative characterization of quantum dynamical complexity . this section contains a large portion of original intriguing numerical results which support few interesting and perhaps surprising conjectures . in section [ sect : conc ] we conclude and discuss some open problems . the central issue of this paper is to verify and demonstrate to what extend the _ complete integrability _ affects non - equilibrium properties of quantum many - body systems and their dynamical complexities , and conversely , whether _ ( strong ) non - integrability _ generically coincides with the established criteria of _ quantum chaos_. let us start by giving some established definitions ( see e.g. @xcite ) of the basic terms needed to understand the issue . a classical hamiltonian many - body system with @xmath0 degrees of freedom is _ completely integrable _ , if there exist @xmath0 functionally independent global smooth phase space functions ( integrals of motion ) which are mutually in involution , i.e. all poisson brackets among them vanish . in such a case global canonical transformation to canonical _ action - angle _ variables can be constructed , and dynamics can be explicitly solved - at least in principle . for locally interacting _ infinite _ systems ( @xmath1 ) analytic methods for an explicit construction of integrals of motion and canonical action - angle variables are known which usually go under a common name of _ inverse scattering method_. explicit solution by a mapping to an iso - spectral sch " rodinger problem in terms of inverse scattering technique is usually understood as a definition of _ complete integrability _ in such context . definition of _ quantum complete integrability _ is less unique . nevertheless , algebraic , non - commutative versions of the inverse scattering technique exist and can be applied to some quantum interacting lattices in one - dimension , generalizing the famous bethe ansatz solution of the heisenberg spin @xmath2 chain , and this is used as the most general known definition of _ quantum complete integrability_. other versions of integrability for finite @xmath0 quantum systems have been proposed but they do not correspond to the integrability of the underlying classical limit , if the latter exists , so these ideas will not be considered in this paper . it has not been generally accepted yet , though demonstrated in many occasions , that completely integrable quantum systems constitute only a small subset of physical models and posses many exceptional ( non - generic ) non - equilibrium dynamical properties , like for example anomalous transport at finite temperatures ( see e.g.@xcite . ) on the other extreme of ergodic hierarchy we have chaotic systems . in classical hamiltonian dynamics of few particles , chaos is best defined in terms of positive algorithmic ( kolmogorov ) complexity of systems trajectories , or equivalently , by exponential sensitivity to initial conditions . however , bounded quantum systems of finite number of particles can not be dynamically complex as their excitation spectrum is discrete , and hence the evolution is necessarily quasi - periodic ( or almost periodic ) . still , quite surprisingly , even for such systems certain dynamical properties are _ random _ and _ universal _ , if the underlying classical limit is sufficiently strongly chaotic @xcite . but genuine dynamical complexity may emerge in thermodynamic limit . however , there is still no completely satisfactory definition of dynamical chaos for infinite quantum systems . the commonly used working definition is the reference with the _ random matrix theory _ @xcite , namely the many - body quantum system is said to be quantum chaotic if its excitation spectrum or some other dynamical properties can be ( on certain energy , or time scale ) well described by ensembles of random hermitian matrices with appropriate symmetry properties . throughout this paper we shall use , either for illustration of theoretical results , or for numerical experimental studies , the following 1d locally interacting quantum lattice system , namely a chain of @xmath0 qubits , or spin @xmath2 particles , coupled with nearest neighbour ising interaction and periodically kicked with spatially homogeneous , but _ arbitrarily oriented _ magnetic field . in a suitable dimensionless units our model can be written in terms of a three - parameter periodic time - dependent hamiltonian @xmath3 @xmath4 is a unit - periodic dirac delta and @xmath5 are the usual pauli spin variables on a finite lattice @xmath6 , satisfying the commutation ( lie ) algebra @xmath7=\sum_\gamma 2\ii\varepsilon_{\alpha \beta\gamma } \delta_{jk } { \sigma^{\gamma}_{j}}$ ] . sometimes it will turn fruitful if we extend the set of pauli matrices by identity matrix and assign them a numerical superscript @xmath8 , namely @xmath9 . the finite chain will often be treated with _ periodic boundary conditions _ , @xmath10 , and sometimes the thermodynamic limit ( tl ) @xmath1 will be considered , in particular when we shall study the statistical mechanics of ( [ eq : hamiltonian ] ) in section [ sect : statmech ] . although kicked hamiltonian one - particle models have been very popular in the field of nonlinear dynamics and quantum chaos for decades , for example the chirikov s kicked rotator model @xcite , the use of kicked systems in quantum many body physics has been so far very limited . if one is not only interested in zero temperature ( ground state ) or low temperature physics , then as we shall try to demonstrate in this review , kicked many - body models like ( [ eq : hamiltonian ] ) provide simpler and clearer phenomenological picture of global dynamics than time - independent models . the main reason is that since energy is not a conserved quantity , the entire hilbert space of many - body configurations is accessible for non - integrable dynamics , and the notions of quantum ergodicity and mixing ( see e.g. ref.@xcite for definitions and further references ) can be defined more clearly than in the time - independent , autonomous setting . perhaps the first kicked interacting quantum lattice has been introduced in ref.@xcite . even if in traditional solid state physics such kicked dynamics would represent un - physically strong excitations , one has to realize that kicked quantum chains could be attractive options as benchmark models of quantum state manipulation and quantum computation in optical lattices . the _ kicked ising _ ( ki ) model ( [ eq : hamiltonian ] ) has been defined for the first time in ref.@xcite , generalizing the integrable ki model with transverse field introduced in ref.@xcite . clearly , as shown there @xcite for the case of _ transverse _ field , @xmath11 , the time - dependent model ( [ eq : hamiltonian ] ) can be considered _ completely integrable _ since it can be solved explicitly , for example by wigner - jordan - bogoliubov transformation to non - interacting spinless fermions , and a large class of its time correlation functions can be calculated explicitly . in addition , an infinite sequence of local conserved quantities ( integrals of motion ) can be constructed in such a case . there is another , trivial _ completely integrable _ regime of ki model , namely the case of _ longitudinal _ field , @xmath12 yet another , more non - trivial _ completely integrable _ regime of ki model is found when the magnitude of dimensionless field is a multiple of @xmath13 , namely @xmath14 , since then the magnetic kick can be considered as a multiple of @xmath15 rotation , and generated by a slightly obscure set of non - interacting spinless fermions . however , in a general case of titled magnetic field when both components @xmath16 and @xmath17 are non - vanishing , and @xmath18 is non - integer , the model is non - integrable , and is conjectured to be not amenable to exact analytical methods . as discussed in the following sections , non - integrable ki model can display a variety of regimes according to the criteria of quantum chaos , quantum ergodicity and quantum mixing . in fact , recently the spectral statistics of ki model in strongly non - integrable regime has been studied in detail and random matrix behaviour has been clearly confirmed at short energy ranges @xcite . due to kicked nature of interaction , the evolution propagator of ki model for one unit period of time ( the so - called floquet operator ) , starting just before the kick , can be constructed explicitly in terms of a time - ordered product @xmath19 the last line suggests a simple efficient quantum protocol to simulate ki model in terms of simple 1-qubit @xmath20 and 2-qubit @xmath21 quantum gates . if we write a compact kicked ising 2-qubit gate @xmath22 and introduce a left - to - right ordered operator product , namely @xmath23 , then we can write ki protocol as a simple string of @xmath24gates @xmath25 the ki model has a better known autonomous limit , namely time - independent ising chain in a tilted magnetic field @xmath26 which is again non - integrable unless the field is transverse @xmath27 , or longitudinal @xmath28 . one of the central questions about the dynamics of complex quantum systems is their robustness against small imperfections in the hamiltonian . while it is clear that due to unitarity the quantum evolution is stable against variation of initial states @xcite , it is not so clear how stable it is against variation of the hamiltonian , either being static or time - dependent - perhaps even noisy . let us write the hamiltonian as @xmath29 , where @xmath30 is the unperturbed hamiltonian , @xmath31 is a hermitian perturbation operator and @xmath32 is a small perturbation parameter . peres @xcite proposed the following measure of stability of quantum evolution : let us start from some fixed initial state @xmath33 , and write the time evolutions of this state generated with the unperturbed and perturbed hamiltonian , as @xmath34 and @xmath35 , respectively . then the stability is characterized by fidelity , _ i.e. _ the squared overlap between these two states @xmath36 there are two alternative interpretations of quantum fidelity : ( i ) one can interpret ( [ eq : fidelity ] ) as a _ quantum loschmidt echo _ , namely the probability that the initial state @xmath33 , which is propagated forward with perturbed evolution @xmath37 , and after that propagated backwards in time with unperturbed evolution @xmath38 , is again measured in the same ( initial ) state . alternatively ( ii ) is just the square modulus of expectation value of the unitary echo operator @xmath39 which is the quantum propagator in the _ interaction picture_. there have been three main theoretical approaches to understanding of fidelity decay in quantum dynamical systems : in a seminal work jalabert and pastawski derived quantum loschmidt echo for systems which posses well defined classical limit . they have shown that under certain conditions , namely that the perturbation strength is large enough - typically larger than appropriately scaled planck constant , and that initial states have certain classical interpretations - like coherent states , position states , etc , the quantum loschmidt echo decays exponentially @xmath40 with the rate @xmath41 which is _ perturbation independent _ and typically equals the lyapunov exponent of the underlying classical dynamics . more recently a completely classical interpretation of this so - called lyapunov decay has been given @xcite in terms of _ the classical loschmidt echo _ and a theory for exponents @xmath41 has been developed in terms of the full spectrum of lyapunov exponents for classical dynamical systems with few @xcite or many @xcite degrees of freedom . in the opposite regime , where the scaled planck constant is bigger than the perturbation strength @xmath32 , one can use time - dependent quantum perturbation theory to second order to derive a simple linear response formula for fidelity decay @xcite @xmath42 in terms of 2-point time correlation function of the perturbation @xmath43 where @xmath44 is the perturbation operator in the interaction picture and @xmath45 is an expectation value in the initial state . from this formula - which can be viewed as a kind of kubo - like linear response theory for dissipation of quantum information , an interesting conclusion can be drawn : fidelity decays faster for systems with slower decay of temporal correlations , or alternatively phrased , quantum system is more robust against external perturbations if it relaxes to equilibrium faster . one can actually go beyond the second order perturbation theory , and sum up the born series for fidelity to all orders in many specific situations @xcite . since we are here mainly interested in qubit ( spin 1/2 ) chains , we shall only review specific results for kicked ising chain @xcite . we shall discuss three different specific values of system parameters , in all three we take @xmath46 : ( a ) integrable regime of transverse field @xmath27 , ( b ) weakly non - integrable regime with @xmath47 , and ( c ) strongly non - integrable regime with @xmath48 . all the results , correlation functions and fidelity , are for random initial states , which can be interpreted as pure states of maximum quantum information , and averaging over random states is equivalent to a tracial state @xmath49 . we consider the evolution operator ( [ eq : floquet ] ) and perturb it by changing the magnetic field such that the perturbation is generated by the transverse component of the magnetization @xmath50 , namely @xmath51^t$ ] . in the integrable case , or in general , in non - ergodic case , where the correlation function @xmath52 ( note that @xmath53 ) approaches a non - vanishing plateau value as @xmath54 , namely time averaged fluctuation of magnetization @xmath55 is non - vanishing @xmath56 , one can sum up born series to all orders , yielding a gaussian decay of fidelity @xmath57 the only assumptions are that @xmath58 is long enough for the time average in the definition of @xmath59 to converge , and short enough that fidelity is still above the finite size plateau value @xmath60 . note that @xmath59 can be considered as an analog of drude weight or charge stiffness in the linear response solid state transport theory ( see e.g. @xcite ) . in figs.([fig : corr],[fig : fid ] ) ( a , b ) one can observe the correlation plateaus of correlation functions for integrable and weakly non - integrable cases and respective good agreement with a gaussian decay of fidelity ( [ eq : gauss ] ) . note that in the integrable case the correlation function and the plateau @xmath59 have been calculated also analytically @xcite . note that for comparing different lattice sizes @xmath0 a size - scaled value of the perturbation strength @xmath61 , with @xmath62 , has been fixed rather than @xmath32 itself . one the other hand , for sufficiently strong integrability breaking , say in case ( c ) of ki model , the correlation function @xmath63 decays to zero in tl , which can be interpreted as quantum mixing behviour . it has been found that quantum mixing behaviour typically corresponds to random matrix ( quasi)energy level statistics , see e.g. ref.@xcite and the subsequent sections of the present paper . we shall call such behaviour the regime of quantum chaos . here again , born series for fidelity can be summed up to all orders , yielding an exponential decay @xcite @xmath64 where @xmath65 is a transport coefficient . the assumptions for validity of ( [ eq : ne ] ) are that @xmath58 is larger than a characteristic mixing time scale on which @xmath66 decays and short enough so that finite size effects in quantum correlation function @xmath66 does not yet affect the transport coefficient @xmath67 . this regime of fidelity decay is sometimes referred to as the fermi golden rule regime . again , as demonstrated in figs . ( [ fig : corr],[fig : fid])c the agreement of numerical data for ki model with the theory is excellent . note that decay time of fidelity scales as @xmath68 for ergodic and mixing dynamics , and as @xmath69 for non - ergodic dynamics , making the latter much more sensitive to small perturbations . complex quantum systems can often be well described by statistical ensembles of hamiltonians @xcite . assuming that @xmath30 and @xmath31 both belong to canonical ensembles of gaussian random matrices , one can evaluate ensemble averages of the fidelity and relate @xmath66 to the spectral form factor of the underlying random matrix ensemble . the perturbative ( linear response ) theory has been developed in ref . @xcite , see also ref . @xcite . furthermore a non - perturbative ( super - symmetric ) averaging has been successfully applied to obtain exact expressions for average fidelity amplitude in the most interesting cases @xcite . rmt theory of fidelity has been successfully applied to chaotic quantum systems and even to several experimental situations @xcite . following more applied philosophy , groups from toulouse and como have performed a series of numerical experiments @xcite analyzing the robustness of several reasonable models of quantum computer hardware under small imperfections , being either due to ( static ) unwanted inter - qubit coupling or due to stochastic ( noisy ) unwanted coupling to the environment , when performing quantum algorithms simulating various toy models of classical and quantum single - particle chaos @xcite , like for example quantum kicked rotator @xcite . the numerical results are in line with a general linear response theory , stating that static perturbations are in general more dangerous than noisy ones . similar thinking as in the previous subsection can be applied to perhaps even more fundamental problem of quantum physics , to the problem of decoherence @xcite . here we shall limit ourselves to an abstract unitary model of decoherence , where we treat a complete unitary evolution over two subsystems , a central system c , and an environment e , and then address a relevant information about the central system ( i.e. the part of the system which is of physical interest ) by partially tracing over the environment . such a discussion can indeed be followed with a close link to the problem of loschmidt echoes , by writing the total hamiltonian @xmath29 as an ideal ( unperturbed ) separable evolution @xmath70 perturbed by a small coupling @xmath31 between the system and the environment . we shall also assume that we start from initial pure state which is a product state @xmath71 we are interested in the properties of a generally mixed state of the central system obtained by partial tracing over the environment @xmath72\ ] ] then , under an ideal evolution , the state of the system remains a product state at all times , so the state of the central system remains pure and there is no decoherence . decoherence is usually characterized in terms of decaying off - diagonal matrix elements of @xmath73 in a suitable pointer state basis , for example in the eigenbasis of the central system hamiltonian @xmath74 . in fact for certain special forms of the perturbation operator @xmath31 , the magnitudes of off - diagonal matrix elements of @xmath73 can be literally written as fidelities , or quantum loschmidt echoes , in the evolution of the environment perturbed by system - environment coupling @xcite . in such framework , the lyapunov regime of fidelity decay corresponds exactly to the lyapunov growth of decoherence discussed by zurek and paz @xcite . however , another interesting indicator of decoherence is the growth of _ bi - partite entanglement _ between the system and the environment . perhaps this notion is even more general since it does not depend on a particular choice of the pointer state basis . since the state of the universe ( central system + environment ) is always pure , the characterization of entanglement is easy , say in terms of von neuman entropy of @xmath73 , @xmath75 , or linear entropy @xmath76 which is a negative logarithm of purity @xmath77 . usually , the quantities @xmath78 and @xmath79 essentially give equivalent results - namely they can both be interpreted as the logarithm of an effective rank of the state @xmath73 , but the linear entropy , or purity , is more amenable to analytical calculations . again considering chaotic models for the central system and the environment , miller and sarkar @xcite ( see also @xcite ) have been able to observe the lyapunov regime of entanglement growth , namely @xmath78 is for sufficiently strong perturbations @xmath32 found to grow linearly @xmath80 with the rate @xmath81 which is perturbation independent and given by ( the sum of positive ) classical lyapunov exponents of the unperturbed , separated ( sub)systems . on the other hand , in the purely quantum regime of small perturbation @xmath32 , again typically smaller than effective planck constant , one can use time - dependent perturbation theory and derive perturbation dependent entanglement entropy @xcite , namely the purity can be explicitly expressed as @xmath82 where @xmath83 is a particular integrated correlation function of the perturbation . in this regime we again find that quantum systems , and quantum environments , which display faster relaxation to equilibrium , are more robust against decoherence due to typical couplings . for studies of bi - partite entanglement , in particular in ki model system , see refs . @xcite . there exists even closer connection to fidelity theory , namely one can prove a general inequality @xcite stating that purity is always bounded by the square of fidelity @xmath84 in other words : @xmath85 gives an upper bound for the growth of the linear entanglement entropy , @xmath86 . in a slightly different context , _ bit - wise _ entanglement between a pair of qubits of a quantum register representing a time dependent quantum state , where the rest of the register is considered as an environment , has been demonstrated to be an indicator of quantum chaos @xcite and even a signature of classical chaos @xcite . in the theory of classical dynamical systems there is a fundamental difference between integrable and chaotic systems as outlined in section [ sect : definitions ] . chaotic systems , having positive algorithmic complexity , unlike the integrable ones , can not be simulated for arbitrary times with a finite amount of information about their initial states . computational complexity of individual chaotic trajectories is linear in time , however , if one wants to describe statistical states ( phase space distributions ) or observables of chaotic classical systems , up to time @xmath58 , exponential amount of computational resources is needed , typically @xmath87 where @xmath81 is the kolmogorov s dynamical entropy related to exponential sensitivity to initial conditions . but on the other hand , how difficult is it to simulate isolated and bounded quantum systems of many interacting particles using classical resources ? in analogy with the classical ( chaotic ) case , we might expect that the best classical simulation of typical quantum systems ( in tl ) is exponentially hard , i.e. the amount of computing resources is expected to grow exponentially with time . even though there is no exponential sensitivity to initial conditions in quantum mechanics , there is a tensor - product structure of the many - body quantum state space which makes its dimension to scale exponentially with the number of particles , as opposed to linear scaling in the classical case , and due to presence of entanglement generic quantum time evolution can not be reduced to ( efficient ) classical computation in terms of non - entangled ( classical like ) states . here we propose the idea to use _ the computation complexity of best possible classical simulation of quantum dynamics , as a measure of quantum algorithmic complexity_. this section essentially reviews the article @xcite . we note that our proposal is different from existing proposals of quantum algorithmic complexity @xcite , namely we consider merely the classical complexity of ( best ) classical simulations of quantum states . in the sense of mora and briegel @xcite , quantum algorithmic complexity _ per unit time _ of initially simple time - evolving quantum states propagated by locally interacting hamiltonian @xmath88 is clearly vanishing , since an approximate quantum circuit which reproduces the state after time @xmath58 is a simple repetition of trotter - suzuki decomposition of @xmath89 . recently , a family of numerical methods for the simulation of interacting many - body systems has been developed @xcite which is usually referred to as time - dependent density - matrix - renormalization group ( tdmrg ) , and which has been shown to provide an efficient classical simulation of some interacting quantum systems . of course , it can not be proven that tdmrg provides the best classical simulation of quantum systems , but it seems that it is by now the best method available . simulations of locally interacting one - dimensional quantum lattices were actually shown rigorously to be efficient in the number @xmath0 of particles @xcite ( i.e. , computation time and memory resources scale as polynomial functions of @xmath0 at fixed @xmath58 , whereas here we are interested in the scaling of computation time and memory with physical time @xmath58 ( in tl , @xmath90 ) , referred to as _ time efficiency_. in this section we address the question of time efficiency implementing tdmrg for a family of ising hamiltonian ( [ eq : hamaut ] ) which undergoes a transition from integrable ( transverse ising ) to non - integrable quantum chaotic regime as the magnetic field is varied . we mainly consider time evolution in operator spaces @xcite , say of density matrices of quantum states , or ( quasi ) local operator algebras . note that time evolution of pure states is often ill defined in tl @xcite . as a quantitative measure of time efficiency we define and compute the minimal dimension @xmath91 of matrix product operator ( mpo ) representation of quantum states / observables which describes time evolution up to time @xmath58 within fidelity @xmath92 . our main question concerns possible scaling of @xmath91 for different types of dynamics , and indeed we shall demonstrate a correspondence between , respectively , quantum chaos or integrability , and exponential or polynomial growth of @xmath91 . the key idea of operator - valued tdmrg @xcite is to represent any operator in a matrix product form , @xmath93 in terms of @xmath94 matrices @xmath95 of fixed dimension @xmath96 . the number of parameters in the mpo representation is @xmath97 and for sufficiently large @xmath96 it can describe any operator . in fact , the minimal @xmath96 required equals to the maximal rank of the reduced super - density - matrix over all bi - partitions of the chain . the advantage of mpo representation lies in the fact that doing an elementary local one or two qubit unitary transformation @xmath98 can be done locally , affecting only a pair of neighboring matrices @xmath95 . we will illustrate evolution of ising chain ( [ eq : hamaut ] ) , with _ open _ boundary conditions , for two different magnetic field values : ( i ) an integrable ( regular ) case @xmath99 with transverse magnetic field , and ( ii ) non - integrable ( quantum chaotic ) case @xmath100 with@xmath101 tilted magnetic field . to confirm that @xmath102 , and @xmath103 , indeed represent generic quantum chaotic , and regular , system , respectively , we calculated level spacing distribution ( lsd ) of their spectra ( shown in fig . [ fig : lsd ] ) . lsd is a standard indicator of quantum chaos @xcite . it displays characteristic level repulsion for strongly non - integrable quantum systems , whereas for integrable systems there is no repulsion due to existence of conservation laws and quantum numbers . evolution by tdmrg proceeds as described in @xcite using an approximate trotter - suziki factorization , for some time step @xmath104 , of the evolution operator @xmath105 in terms of 2-qubit gates . and for each two qubit gates , the matrices @xmath95 can be updates using a singular value decomposition with some truncation error @xmath106 . interestingly , it has been found @xcite that the sum of all truncation errors up to time @xmath58 , denoted by @xmath107 ( provided @xmath104 is small enough so that the trotter - suzuki factorization error is negligible ) is simply proportional to _ fidelity error _ , namely @xmath108 where @xmath109 and numerical constant @xmath110 does not dependent on either @xmath104 , @xmath96 or @xmath0 . the central quantity we are going to study is @xmath111 which is the minimal dimension @xmath96 of matrices @xmath112 in order for the total truncation error @xmath107 to be less than some error tolerance @xmath113 , for evolution to time @xmath58 . in numerical experiments shown we take @xmath114 except for simulating thermal states of quenched hamiltonians where @xmath115 . for a reference we start by investigating the evolution of pure states following the basic tdmrg algorithm @xcite . we studied time efficiency of simulation of _ pure states _ in schr " odinger picture , for which many examples of efficient applications exist , however all for initial states of rather particular structure , typically corresponding to low energy sectors of few quasi - particle excitations or to low dimensional invariant subspaces . treating other , typical states , e.g. eigenstates of unrelated hamiltonians , linear combinations of highly excited states , or states chosen randomly in the many - particle hilbert space , we found that , irrespectively of integrability of dynamics , tdmrg is _ not _ time - efficient , i.e. @xmath91 typically grows exponentially in time even in the integrable case of transverse field ( consistently with a linear growth of entanglement entropy @xcite ) . numerical results are summarized in fig . [ fig : pure ] . we continue by discussing the time efficiency of operator - valued tdmrg method using mpos ( [ eq : mpo ] ) . let us first study the case where the initial operator is a local operator in the center of the lattice @xmath116 . in the integrable case time evolution @xmath117 can be computed exactly in terms of jordan - wigner transformation and toeplitz determinants @xcite , however for initial operators with infinite _ index _ [ sect.2 , 1st of refs.@xcite ] is half the number of fermi operators in jordan - wigner transformation of @xmath118 and is a conserved quantity for @xmath103 . ] like e.g for @xmath119 , @xmath1 , the evolution is rather complex and the effective number of terms ( pauli group elements ) needed to span @xmath117 grows exponentially in @xmath58 . in spite of that , our numerical simulations shown in fig . [ fig : local ] strongly suggest the linear growth @xmath120 for initial operators with infinite index . quite interestingly , for initial operators with _ finite _ index , @xmath121 saturates to a finite value , for example @xmath122 for @xmath123 , or @xmath124 for @xmath125 . in non - integrable cases the rank has been found to grow exponentially , @xmath126 with exponent @xmath127 which does _ not _ depend on @xmath113 , properties of @xmath128 or @xmath0 , for large @xmath0 . for @xmath129 we find @xmath130 . in physics it is often useful to consider extensive observables , for instance translational sums of local operators , e.g. the hamiltonian @xmath88 or the total magnetization @xmath131 . as opposed to local operators , extensive initial operators , interpreted as w - like states in operator space , contain some long - range ` entanglement ' so one may expect that tdmrg should be somewhat less efficient than for local operators . indeed , in the integrable case we find for extensive operators with _ finite _ index that @xmath91 does no longer saturate but now grows linearly , @xmath120 , whereas for extensive operators with _ infinite _ index the growth may be even somewhat faster , most likely quadratic @xmath132 but clearly slower than exponential . in the non - integrable case , we again find exponential growth @xmath133 with the same exponent @xmath134 as for local initial observables . the results are summarized in fig . [ fig : transl ] . in the last set of numerical experiments we consider time efficiency of the evolution of a thermal initial state @xmath135 under a sudden change of the hamiltonian at @xmath136 , namely @xmath137 . again , we treat two situations : in the first case we consider change after which the hamiltonian remains integrable , @xmath138 , while in the other case the change breaks integrability of the hamiltonian , @xmath139 . the initial state is prepared by means of imaginary time tdmrg from initial identity operator using the same mpo rank @xmath96 as it is later used for real time dynamics . we find , consistently with previous results , that at high temperature ( @xmath140 ) the rank @xmath91 grows very slowly , perhaps slower than linear , in the integrable case , and exponentially @xmath133 , in the non - integrable case . interestingly , at lower temperatures we find exponential growth in both cases , even in the integrable one . this is not unreasonable as the initial ( thermal ) state can be expanded in a power series in @xmath141 and the higher orders @xmath142 become less local with longer entanglement range as we increase the power @xmath143 . these results are summarized in fig . [ fig : rhot ] . in this section we would like to demonstrate the connection between quantum chaos , ( non)integrability and transport in non - equilibrium steady states of interacting quantum chains @xcite . within the linear response theory , the property of quantum mixing ( which is typically implied by quantum chaos , i.e. by the validity of random matrix level statistics @xcite , see also correlation functions in sect.[sect : losch ] ) , is typically synonymous for normal quantum transport since it implies _ finite _ kubo transport coefficients @xcite ( provided temporal correlation functions decay fast enough ) . however , here we would like to address the connection between quantum chaos and transport in far - from - equilibrium steady state , which may be beyond applicability of linear response . in particular , we are interested in the validity @xcite of the fourier law @xmath144 in quantum chains , relating the macroscopic heat flux @xmath145 to the temperature gradient @xmath146 . to investigate this problem one has to deal with a finite open system connected to heat baths . here we consider an interacting quantum spin-@xmath2 chain ( [ eq : hamaut ] ) which exhibits the transition from integrability to quantum chaos as a parameter , e.g. the magnetic field , is varied . the standard treatment of this problem is based on the master equation , thus limiting numerical investigations to relatively small system sizes . by using this method , in an interesting paper @xcite , the decay of current correlation function in a model of non - integrable chain of quantum spins is computed . however , these results were not fully conclusive and the conclusions rely on linear response theory . also , in @xcite lindblad formalism was used to study the validity of fourier s law for different type of spin - spin interaction . here we describe a different approach ( see ref.@xcite for details ) namely we follow the evolution of the system described by a _ pure _ state , which is _ stochastically _ coupled to an idealized model of heat baths . stochastic coupling is realized in terms of a local measurement at the boundary of the system and _ stochastic _ but _ unitary _ exchange of energy between the system and the bath . by this method we have been able to perform very effective numerical simulations which allow to observe a clear energy / temperature profile and to measure the heat current @xmath145 . again we consider ising spin chain in the magnetic field ( [ eq : hamaut ] ) of size @xmath0 , where the first and the last spin are coupled to thermal baths at temperatures @xmath147 and @xmath148 , respectively . in the non - integrable regime where the spectral statistics is described by rmt - the regime of quantum chaos - we found very accurate fourier law scaling @xmath149 , where @xmath0 is the size of the chain . in the integrable and near - integrable ( _ non - ergodic _ ) regimes instead , we found that the heat transport is ballistic @xmath150 . let us describe the numerical simulations . again we consider the autonomous model ( [ eq : hamaut ] ) at three particular cases : ( _ i _ ) _ quantum chaotic case _ @xmath151 at which lsd agrees with rmt and thus corresponds to the regime of quantum chaos , ( _ ii _ ) _ integrable case _ @xmath152 , at which lsd is close to the poisson distribution , and ( _ iii _ ) _ intermediate case _ @xmath153 at which the distribution lsd shows and intermediate character of weak level repulsion and exponential tail @xcite . let us now turn to study the energy transport in this model system . to this end we need to couple both ends of the chain of spins to thermal baths at temperatures @xmath154 . we have devised a simple way to simulate this coupling , namely the state of the spin in contact with the bath is statistically determined by a boltzmann distribution with parameter @xmath155 . our model for the baths is analogous to the stochastic thermal baths used in classical simulations @xcite and we thus call it a _ quantum stochastic thermal bath_. in the representation basis of @xmath156 the wave function at time @xmath58 can be written as @xmath157 where @xmath158 represents the _ up _ , _ down _ state of the @xmath159-th spin , respectively . the wave function at time @xmath58 is obtained from the unitary evolution operator @xmath160 . the interaction with the bath is not included in the unitary evolution . instead , we assume that the spin chain and the bath interact only at discrete times with period @xmath161 at which the states of the leftmost ( @xmath162 ) and the rightmost ( @xmath163 ) spins are stochastically reset . thus , the evolution of the wave function from time @xmath58 to time @xmath164 can be represented as @xmath165 where @xmath166 represents the _ stochastic _ action of the interaction with the left and right baths at temperatures @xmath167 and @xmath168 respectively . the action of @xmath169 takes place in several steps : * ( _ i _ ) the wave function is first rotated by the angle to the eigenbasis of the components @xmath170 , @xmath171 of the edge spins along the field @xmath172 , that is @xmath173 . here , @xmath174 stands for the magnitude of the magnetic field . * ( _ ii _ ) a local measurement of the observables @xmath175 , @xmath176 is performed . then the state of the spins at the borders collapses to a state ( @xmath177,@xmath178 ) with probability @xmath179 , we put all coefficients @xmath180 with @xmath181 to zero . * ( _ iii _ ) the new state of the edge spins @xmath182 is stochastically chosen . after this action simulating the thermal interaction with the baths each of the edge spins is set to _ down _ , ( _ up _ ) state with probability @xmath183,(@xmath184 ) . if the new state of @xmath162 , or @xmath163 , is different than the one after step ( ii ) , then a simple unitary spin flip is performed to the wave - function . the probability @xmath185 depends on the canonical temperature of each of the thermal baths : @xmath186 * ( _ iv _ ) finally , the wave function is rotated back to the @xmath187 basis , @xmath188 . this completes the description of the interaction with the quantum stochastic bath . this interaction thus ( periodically ) resets the value of the local energy @xmath189 of the spins in contact with the baths . therefore , the value of @xmath161 controls the strength of the coupling to the bath . we have found that , in our units , @xmath190 provides an optimal choice . we have nevertheless performed simulations for other values of @xmath161 with qualitatively similar results . in particular , for weak couplings ( @xmath191 ) the heat conductivity does not depend on the coupling strength . note that our method does not correspond to a standard stochastic unraveling of a master equation for the density operator ( _ e.g. _ , in the lindblad form ) @xcite . however , we have tested that , using our prescription , averages over the ensemble of quantum trajectories or time averages of one given quantum trajectory are sufficient to reconstruct a density matrix operator @xmath192 that correctly describes the internal thermal state of the system in and out of equilibrium . for each run the initial wave - function @xmath193 of the system is chosen at random . the system is then evolved for some relaxation time @xmath194 after which it is assumed to fluctuate around a unique steady state . measurements are then performed as time averages of the expectation values of suitable observables . we further average these quantities over different random realizations of `` quantum trajectories '' . out of equilibrium energy profile @xmath195 for the chaotic chain . the temperatures of the baths @xmath196 and @xmath197 , are both in the high temperature regime . results for chains of size @xmath198 ( crosses ) , @xmath199 ( open circles ) and @xmath200 ( solid circles ) are shown . the dashed line was obtained from a linear fit of the data for @xmath200 for the @xmath201 central spins . insets ( i ) and ( ii ) show the energy profile for the integrable and intermediate cases respectively , for @xmath202 . ] in order to compute the energy profile we write the hamiltonian ( [ eq : hamaut ] ) in terms of local energy density operators @xmath203 : @xmath204 such that the total hamiltonian ( [ eq : hamaut ] ) can be written as @xmath205 apart from the boundary corrections . first we have performed equilibrium simulations in order to show that time averaged expectation values of the local energy density can be used to determine canonical local temperature . to this end we set the left and right baths to the same temperature @xmath155 . for low @xmath155 , the energy per site @xmath206 saturates to a constant which , together with the entire energy profile @xmath195 , is determined by the ground state . however , for larger @xmath207 , the energy profile is constant within numerical accuracy , and numerical simulations give @xmath208 , all results being almost independent of @xmath0 for @xmath209 . the numerical data for @xmath210 can be well approximated with a simple calculation of energy density for a two - spin chain ( @xmath211 ) in a canonical state at temperature @xmath155 , namely @xmath212 . therefore , if the temperatures of both baths are in high @xmath155 regime , then we can define the local temperature via the relation @xmath213 . we stress that equilibrium numerical data shown are _ insensitive _ to the nature of dynamics ( consistent with results of ref.@xcite ) , whether being chaotic , regular or intermediate . size dependence of the energy current in the chaotic chain with @xmath214 and @xmath197 . we show @xmath215 ( open circles ) and @xmath216 ( open squares ) . the dashed lines corresponds to @xmath217 scaling . in the inset , the size dependence of the energy current is shown for the integrable ( solid circles ) and the intermediate ( solid squares ) cases . ] in fig . [ fig:3 ] we show the energy profile @xmath195 for an out of equilibrium simulation of the chaotic chain . in all non - equilibrium simulations , the temperatures of the baths were set to @xmath218 and @xmath219 . after an appropriate scaling the profiles for different sizes @xmath0 collapse to the same curve . more interesting , in the bulk of the chain the energy profile is in very good approximation linear . in contrast , we show that in the case of the integrable ( inset i ) and intermediate ( inset ii ) chains , no energy gradient is created which is a characteristic of ballistic transport . we now define the local current operators through the equation of continuity : @xmath220 = - ( j_{n+1 } - j_n)$ ] , requiring that @xmath221 $ ] . using eqs . ( [ eq : h_local ] ) and ( [ eq : hamaut ] ) the local heat current operators are explicitly given by @xmath222 . in fig . [ fig:4 ] we plot @xmath215 as a function of the size @xmath0 of the system for sizes up to @xmath200 . the mean current @xmath145 is calculated as an average of @xmath223 over time and space @xmath159 . the energy difference was obtained from the energy profile as @xmath224 . two spins near each bath have been discarded in order to be in the bulk regime . since @xmath225 is an effective size of the truncated system , the observed @xmath226 dependence confirms that the transport is normal ( diffusive ) . moreover , also the quantity @xmath227 , where @xmath228 , shows the correct scaling with the size @xmath0 . on the other hand , in integrable and intermediate chains we have observed that the average heat current does not depend on the size @xmath229 , clearly indicating the ballistic transport . let us now come back to the kicked ising model ( [ eq : hamiltonian ] ) and try to consider some very elementary but fundamental questions considering its dynamics and non - equilibrium statistical mechanics . observing data of fig . [ fig : corr ] in section ( [ sect : losch ] ) one can conclude that the model perhaps displays an interesting order to chaos , or non - ergodicity to ergodicity transition when the integrability breaking parameter is increased . now we would like to inspect this transition more closely , and in particular understand the rate of relaxation to equilibrium in the ergodic and mixing case . we should stress right from the start that we are unable to prove any non - trivial statements about the model , but we can provide many suggestive numerical experiments which can be performed in a rather efficient way . we have learned in section [ sect : mps ] that it may be more fruitful to consider time evolution in the operator algebra spaces instead of in the spaces of pure states . let us go now a bit deeper into this subject . for some related results on high - temperature relaxation in isolated conservative many - body quantum systems see e.g. refs.@xcite . time automorphism on unital quasi - local @xmath230 algebra ( see e.g. @xcite for introduction into the subject ) @xmath231 , @xmath232 of an infinite ki lattice , for one period of the kick , can be explicitly constructed by the following observations . formally , for any @xmath233 , @xmath234 , where @xmath235 is given by either ( [ eq : floquet],[eq : protocol],[eq : protocol2 ] ) . let @xmath236}$ ] , with @xmath237 , denote a finite , local @xmath238 dimensional algebra on a sub - lattice @xmath239 \subset \z$ ] , which is spanned by operators @xmath240 . it is straightforward to prove that dynamics is _ strictly local _ @xmath241 } \to { \cal a}_{[m-1,n+1]}. \label{eq : locality}\ ] ] in other words , the homomorphism @xmath242 ( [ eq : locality ] ) is a simple nontrivial example of a quantum cellular automaton as defined by schumacher and werner @xcite . @xmath231 can also be treated as a hilbert space with respect to the following inner product @xmath243 , where @xmath244 is a tracial state , @xmath245 for @xmath246}$ ] . this hilbert space can be in fact considered as a 1d lattice of 4-level quantum systems ( qudits with @xmath247 ) with the orthonormal basis @xmath248 labeled by an infinite sequence of 4-digits @xmath249 . restricting for a moment to a dimer lattice @xmath250}$ ] we can write the adjoint action of a 2-qubit gate @xmath251 ( [ eq : wgate ] ) in terms of a @xmath252 unitary matrix @xmath253 where , very explicitly @xmath254 . \quad\quad\ ] ] we should note that the map is unital @xmath255 , and that due to anti - unitary symmetry of ki model , the matrix @xmath256 is _ real_. we extend the map @xmath257 to entire algebra @xmath231 by @xmath258 , for any @xmath259}$ ] , @xmath260}$ ] . now , following the protocol ( [ eq : protocol2 ] ) we finish the construction of the time automorphism as a string of right - to - left ordered 2-qudit ( with @xmath247 ) gates @xmath261 explicitly , for any local observable @xmath262}$ ] , we have the following * algorithm 1 * : 1 . set an initial vector : @xmath263 . 2 . for @xmath264 : @xmath265 3 . the result is @xmath266 the algorithm produces exact result in @xmath267 multiplications and about the same number of additions . let @xmath268 } : { \cal a}_{\z } \to { \cal a}_{[m , n]}$ ] denote a _ linear orthogonal projector _ , satisfying @xmath268}(a\otimes e ) = ( \one|e)a$ ] if @xmath269}$],@xmath270}$ ] . let us define a truncated time evolution operator @xmath271 } = \ap_{[m , n ] } \at : { \cal a}_{[m , n ] } \to { \cal a}_{[m , n]}$ ] which we can actually implement on a computer with a finite memory register . the `` infinite - temperature '' time correlation function of ( traceless ) local quantum observables @xmath272}$ ] can be written as @xmath273 , where @xmath274 . an interesting question is , up to what time @xmath58 the @xmath275 can be computed numerically exactly with a finite computer register @xmath276 $ ] of @xmath277 qudits of size @xmath278 ? due to locality ( [ eq : locality ] ) of time homomorphism one can easily prove that @xmath279}^t a } , \quad { \rm for } \quad t \le 2l \label{eq : excorloc}\ ] ] hence the correlation functions are computable exactly up to time @xmath280 , and as we shall see later , truncated correlation function @xmath281 } a}$ ] often well approximates @xmath275 even at later times , or even its asymptotic decay . let us continue our discussion by considering time evolution for _ translationally invariant extensive _ ( tie ) observables . given some quasi - local observable @xmath282 we shall construct the corresponding tie observable by a formal mapping , @xmath283 in terms of lattice translation automorphisms @xmath284 , @xmath285 . the image of the entire quasi - local algebra under this mapping @xmath286 , is not a @xmath230 algebra , but it is a linear space which can be again turned into a hilbert space with the following inner product @xmath287}(x)}{\ap_{[-n , n]}(y)}\ ] ] where the domain of projector @xmath288}$ ] is extended to @xmath289 by continuity . orthonormal basis of @xmath289 is given by tie observables @xmath290 , for _ orders _ @xmath291 , and for uniqueness of notation , requiring @xmath292 . we shall interchangeably represent finite sequences of 4-digits with integers , @xmath293 . let @xmath294 be @xmath295 dimensional subspace spanned by tie observables @xmath296 with order @xmath297 , i.e. for @xmath298 having at most @xmath299 base-4 digits , so we have an inclusion sequence @xmath300 . since time and space automorphisms commute @xmath301 , one can immediately extend the time map onto the space of tie observables , @xmath302 by continuity . formally , we have @xmath303 . furthermore , locality ( [ eq : locality ] ) implies @xmath304 so we can write a simple adaptation of algorithm 1 for explicit construction of a time map of an arbitrary finite - order tie observable @xmath305 : * algorithm 2 * : 1 . take the following pre - image of the tie observable @xmath306}$ ] , namely @xmath307 . 2 . compute @xmath308 of @xmath309}$ ] according to * algorithm 1*. 3 . transforming back to @xmath289 the result reads @xmath310 let us further define the _ natural truncations _ of tie space to order @xmath299 , @xmath311 as orthogonal projections @xmath312 , and truncated time evolution operators @xmath313 , which are naturally implemented on a computer by simply truncating overflowing coefficients @xmath314 . physically interesting question now concerns computation of time correlation functions between a pair of finite order ( say @xmath315 ) tie observables @xmath316 , namely @xmath317 , for example in fig . [ fig : corr ] we have shown the case of @xmath318 . as a consequence of locality ( [ eq : locality ] ) , and translational invariance , we find that the truncated evolution on @xmath294 , reproduces correlation functions exactly @xmath319 few remarks are in order : ( i ) truncated translationally invariant time evolution @xmath320 is perhaps more natural object to study than truncated local time evolution @xmath271}$ ] , for a simple reason that the truncation @xmath321 commutes with a shift @xmath322 , while @xmath268}$ ] does not . ( ii ) a space @xmath289 can be identified with translationally invariant linear functionals over @xmath231 , namely @xmath323 , @xmath324 , @xmath282 . we have @xmath325 and @xmath326 where hermitian adjoint maps @xmath327 and @xmath328 simply correspond to _ time reversed _ dynamics . ( iii ) convex subspace of positive translationally invariant functionals @xmath329 is an interesting invariant subspace of physical states , @xmath330 . in classical mechanics of chaotic systems one typically observes that states ( phase - space densities ) develop small details in the course of time evolution at an exponential average rate . consequently , introducing a small stochastic noise of strength @xmath113 to perron - frobenius operator ( pfo , i.e. liouvillian propagator for discrete time dynamics ) , makes it non - unitary and shifts its spectrum inside the unit circle . typically , the effect of noise is equivalent to an ultraviolet cutoff - truncation of pfo - at the fourier scale @xmath331 , and often the leading eigenvalues of truncated pfo - the so - called ruelle resonances - remain frozen inside the unit circle in the limit @xmath332 ( or @xmath333 ) @xcite . for a general introduction to relaxation phenomena in classical hamiltonian dynamics see e.g. @xcite . let us now draw some some analogies with our quantum setting . we have seen that that the evolution @xmath334 somehow most closely resembles liouvillian evolution of classical hamiltonian dynamics . in hilbert space topology , operator @xmath334 is unitary and its spectrum lies on a unit circle , just like in the case of classical pfo . however , truncated @xmath335 matrices @xmath320 represent natural `` ultraviolet '' cutoff truncations for increasing orders @xmath299 . let us check numerically if some eigenvalues of these matrices remain frozen when @xmath336 . indeed , as we demonstrate in fig . [ fig : s ] , we find several eigenvalues which converge as @xmath299 increases in the case of strongly non - integrable ( quantum chaotic ) case , with a gap between an eigenvalue of maximal modulus and the unit circle , whereas in the integrable case a set of @xmath299 eigenvalues touch the unit circle ( actually eigenvalue 1 is @xmath299-fold degenerate ) . numerical results suggest the following speculative conclusions . let @xmath337 be the converged ( frozen ) eigenvalues of @xmath320 , and @xmath338 , @xmath339 the corresponding _ right _ and _ left _ eigenvectors , respectively . then for arbitrary pair @xmath340 , the time correlation function can be expressed in terms of spectral decomposition ( see e.g. @xcite ) @xmath341 the above relation is the contribution of the point spectrum and is exact if the spectrum is pure - point . however , in classical cases one may quite typically have various singular components and branch cuts @xcite . note that the denominator @xmath342 is finite although both vectors should have infinite @xmath343 norm @xmath344 , @xmath345 , for any eigenvalue away from the unit circle , @xmath346 . there is a simple relation between the spectrum of pfo and the ergodic properties of dynamics : ( i ) if there is a _ spectral gap _ , i.e. there exists @xmath347 such that for all @xmath159 , @xmath348 , then dynamics is _ exponentially mixing _ , @xmath349 ( ii ) if some eigenvalues are on the unit circle , meaning that the corresponding eigenvector coefficients should be in @xmath343 , then the system is _ non - mixing _ since there are correlation functions which do not decay . ( iii ) if some eigenvalues are at @xmath350 then the system is _ non - ergodic _ since the correlation functions may have non - vanishing time - averages . if @xmath351 is a complete set of orthonormalized eigenvectors corresponding to eigenvalue @xmath350 , @xmath352 ( and note that since we are on the unit circle : @xmath353 ) then @xmath354 the latter ( iii ) happens in generic completely integrable quantum lattices , where @xmath351 correspond to an infinite sequence of conservation laws @xcite . furthermore , we have a strong numerical evidence that also in certain non - integrable quantum lattices @xcite , and also in ki model @xcite , one has a regime where few normalizable ( pseudo - local ) but not local ( like in integrable models ) conservation laws exist . this situation we call the regime of _ intermediate _ dynamics and is characterized by a non - vanishing _ stiffness _ @xmath355 signalling _ ballistic transport_. in figure [ fig : c ] we compare the time autocorrelation function of the transverse magnetization @xmath356 computed in three different ways : ( 1 ) from exact time evolution @xmath357 on a finite lattice of length @xmath0 with periodic boundary conditions , ( 2 ) iteration of truncated ta matrix on infinite lattice @xmath358 and ( 3 ) asymptotics based on ( few ) leading eigenvalue resonance(s ) ( using formula ( [ eq : corr ] ) in terms of @xmath359 and @xmath360 . ) . . gray level indicates the spectral gap @xmath361 of @xmath320 as a function of @xmath16 and @xmath17 at fixed @xmath362 . white regions correspond to @xmath363.,width=302 ] we note that the leading eigenvalue and eigenvector of truncated ta @xmath320 can most efficiently be computed using our algorithm 2 as a key step of an iterative _ power - method_. in this way we were able to perform calculations of the leading ruelle resonances up to @xmath364 in contrast to full diagonalization of truncated matrices @xmath320 which were feasible only up to @xmath365 . let us observe the structure of the eigenvector coefficients @xmath366 corresponding to the leading eigenvalue . numerical results ( see fig . [ fig : v ] , see also subsect.[sect : scaling ] later ) strongly suggest self - similar behaviour upon multiplying the code @xmath298 by @xmath367 which is a consequence of the fractal structure of the transfer matrix ( see illustration in ref.@xcite ) . as a function of @xmath16 at @xmath368 at different truncation orders @xmath299 . in the inset we indicate a line of transition in 2d phase diagram . , width=151 ] as a function of @xmath369 at @xmath370 at different truncation orders @xmath299 . in the inset we indicate a line of transition in 2d phase diagram . , width=151 ] the stiffness @xmath371 and the spectral gap @xmath372 may be considered as _ order parameters _ , characterizing a particular kind of dynamical phase transition , namely the transition from non - ergodic dynamics - ordered phase , where @xmath355 for a typical @xmath373 which is not orthogonal to all conservation laws @xmath351 , i.e. normalizable eigenvectors of @xmath334 with eigenvalue @xmath350 . ] , or @xmath374 , to an ergodic and mixing dynamics - disordered phase , where @xmath375 , for all traceless @xmath324 , or @xmath376 . we know that ki model is non - ergodic in integrable regimes let us consider a fixed transverse field case @xmath11 , and start to switch on a small amount of longitudinal field @xmath16 . the interesting question is whether the transition happens for infinitesimal integrability breaking parameter @xmath16 in tl , or at a finite - _ critical _ field . in fig . [ fig : phasediagram ] , we fix @xmath362 and plot a two dimensional phase diagram of the spectral gap @xmath377 . it is clear that we have different behaviours in different regions of parameter space , for example we identify two : ( i ) type i transition : if the transverse field is roughly on the interval @xmath378 $ ] , then the spectral gap opens in the fastest possible manner which is allowed by a @xmath379 symmetry and the analyticity of the problem , namely @xmath380 . see fig . [ fig : typei ] . ( ii ) type ii transition : if the initial transverse field @xmath381 , or @xmath382 , then the gap opens up in a much more abrupt - perhaps a discontinuous way . we give an example by scanning the diagonal transition , i.e. putting @xmath369 and increasing @xmath16 from zero . numerical results , shown in fig.[fig : typeii ] can not be made fully conclusive , but they are not inconsistent with a conclusion that an abrupt transition to ergodic behaviour takes place at @xmath383 . there is another possibly interesting way of characterizing the transition , i.e. in terms of pseudo - local translationally invariant conservation laws @xcite . such conservation laws are the square normalizable elements @xmath384 , which are mapped onto themselves under the dynamics @xmath385 . we shall first make a non - trivial variational mpo ansatz for elements of @xmath289 , namely let us take an auxiliary vector space @xmath386 , where @xmath387 . then any operator @xmath388 , which is formally written in terms of mpo on the _ infinite _ spin chain @xmath389 where @xmath390 have the block matrix form ( for @xmath391 ) : @xmath392 represents a translationally invariant pseudo - local operator , i.e. an element of @xmath289 , provided that @xmath393 and @xmath394 , where @xmath395 is a spectral matrix norm and @xmath396 s stand for arbitrary matrices / vectors . of course , converse can not be generally true , not any element of @xmath289 can be written as mpo ( [ eq : timpo ] ) with finite @xmath96 , but still there are elements of the form ( [ eq : timpo ] , [ eq : mpodata ] ) which are not in @xmath294 for _ any _ finite @xmath299 . there exist a straightforward algorithm which performs time evolution on mpo data ( [ eq : mpodata ] ) , namely @xmath397 is also of the form ( [ eq : timpo],[eq : mpodata ] ) with dimension @xmath398 . we shall now make the following simple numerical experiment . let us fix @xmath96 , setting @xmath399 representing the simplest @xmath334-invariant subclass of ( [ eq : timpo],[eq : mpodata ] ) , and optimize ( maximize ) the fidelity - like quantity @xmath400 within this class of operators . let us write an operator which maximizes @xmath401 for a given @xmath96 as @xmath402 . note that @xmath403 gives a strong - topology measure of conservation of observable @xmath402 in one step of time evolution , so @xmath404 only for exact conservation laws . increasing @xmath96 may improve fidelity , if pseudo local conservation laws exist to which @xmath402 may converge , however in ergodic and mixing situation where no exact pseudo - local conservation laws exist , increasing @xmath96 should have no significant effect to fidelity @xmath405 . this is exactly what we observe in ki model following a line of type ii transition ( see fig . [ fig : conslaw ] ) . numerical results of section [ sect : mps ] suggested that operator space entanglement measures can be used to characterize the complexity of time evolution , namely the minimal required rank @xmath406 of mpo ansatz is simply related to entanglement entropy of a time - evolving local observable , which is interpreted as a hilbert space vector . in order to make things as simple and precise as possible we go back to the time evolution automorphism @xmath242 over the quasi - local spin algebra @xmath231 . let us take some truncation order @xmath407 and consider the truncated map @xmath408}$ ] . starting with local operators on a single site @xmath409}$ ] this truncated map is exact up to time @xmath410 . writing time evolved observable at any instant of time as @xmath411 } a(0 ) = \sum_{\ve{s } } a^{(t)}_{(s_{-n},\ldots s_n ) } { { | s_{-n},\ldots , s_n ) } } $ ] in terms of a ` wave - function ' @xmath412 , and partitioning a sub - lattice at @xmath413 , as @xmath414 = [ -n , m-1 ] \cup [ m , n]$ ] , we can define @xmath415 reduced super - density matrix as @xmath416 since @xmath417 is interpreted as a ` _ pure state _ ' , namely a vector from @xmath418}\otimes{\cal a}_{[m , n]}$ ] , the operator space entanglement is most simply characterized either by von neuman entropy @xmath419 or linear entropy @xmath420 where @xmath421 ^ 2 $ ] is a purity of reduced super - density matrix . in fig . [ fig : pursuperrho ] we plot the entanglement purity @xmath422 for close to symmetric bipartition @xmath423 where the entanglement is expected to be maximal for three different characteristic cases of ki model , which will be in the following referred to as : _ quantum chaotic _ ( qc ) , @xmath424 , _ integrable _ ( in ) , @xmath425 , and _ non - ergodic _ ( ne ) non - integrable case , @xmath426 . we find that in qc case purity decreases exponentially @xmath427 , meaning @xmath428 , where the exponent @xmath127 is independent of the initial observable @xmath429 and asymptotically independent of @xmath299 . on the other hand , in in case @xmath422 does not decay at all so the resulting dynamical entropy @xmath430 , whereas in ne case @xmath422 decays slowly , likely slower than exponentially . the eigenvectors of @xmath334 corresponding non - unimodular eigenvalues seem to exhibit a certain scaling invariance ( fig . [ fig : v ] ) . here we would like to explore this property in a little bit more detail . for that purpose we again explore the map @xmath408}$ ] on the quasi - local algebra @xmath431}$ ] since the representation of dynamics is conceptually simpler ( algorithm 1 ) than dynamics @xmath432 on @xmath433 . in particular , it is worth to mention that if one traces out an additional qudit after each time step , then the dynamics is exact on a _ closed _ set of @xmath434 super - density matrices and has a simple explicit form in terms of a completely positive matrix map . ] @xmath435 t^\dagger_{n - m}\right\ } , \label{eq : rdynamics1 } \\ & & t_{r } = \prod_{0\le k \le r}^- \one_4^{\otimes k}\otimes w\otimes \one_4^{\otimes ( r - k ) } , \label{eq : rdynamics2}\end{aligned}\ ] ] namely no truncation is needed since at time @xmath436 we are describing an exact observable on @xmath437}$ ] . we write @xmath438 for tracing out the least significant qudit , and @xmath439 is an elementary @xmath440 projector . note that @xmath441 is just a matrix of @xmath271}$ ] in the canonical basis @xmath442 . it is rather trivial to exactly solve this dynamics for a small finite @xmath443 , however this does not yield physically very useful information about the ki dynamics . one would wish to study the correct tl by first taking @xmath444 , and only after that @xmath445 , however this task seems almost computationally intractable . still , we were able to make some modest numerical experiments exploring this question , suggesting that for sufficiently strong integrability breaking ( say qc case ) the asymptotic matrix @xmath446 has a remarkable scale invariance if we coarse - grain it by tracing over its @xmath440 blocks : @xmath447 where @xmath448 is some scaling factor . this seems to be true for both orders of the limits @xmath449 , @xmath444 , although better numerical results have been obtained for the ` incorrect ' limit , namely letting the number of iterations @xmath449 for a finite register size @xmath159 , and then checking the convergence of results with increasing @xmath159 . before discussing numerical results we note another useful observation let us define and briefly study ki chain on a _ semi - infinite _ lattice @xmath450 $ ] , with the hamiltonian ( [ eq : hamiltonian ] ) for @xmath90 and open boundary condition on the left edge . now we consider a quasi - local algebra @xmath451 . the time automorphism is again strictly local @xmath452 } \to { \cal a}_{[0,n+1]}$ ] , and can be written as a semi - infinite product @xmath453 . in the definition of the truncated time map @xmath454 } = \ap_{[0,n ] } \at^+ : { \cal a}_{[0,n ] } \to { \cal a}_{[0,n]}$ ] truncation is needed only on the right edge . note that due to this property , simulation of local observables ( localized near the edge of the lattice ) is twice as efficient than on doubly - infinite lattice , meaning that with the same size of computer register one can exactly simulate for twice longer times . for example , computation of correlation functions @xmath455^t a}$ ] is exact @xmath456^t a } = \braket{b}{[\at^+_{[0,n]}]^t a},\quad { \rm for}\;\ ; t \le 2(n - q ) , \quad { \rm if}\;\ ; a , b\in { \cal a}_{[0,q]}.\ ] ] numerically inspecting the correlation functions of a simple local spin @xmath457 in fig . [ fig : cfsc ] we find clear asymptotic exponential decay for qc case , whereas for in and ne cases we find non - vanishing plateaus in the correlation function , i.e. non - vanishing stiffness @xmath458 which signals non - ergodicity and existence of local ( for integrable cases ) and pseudo - local ( for non - ergodic and non - integrable cases , e.g. ne ) conservation laws of @xmath459 . we note that the asymptotic correlation decay in non - integrable cases , say qc and ne , seems quite insensitive to increasing truncation order @xmath159 - indicating that the leading eigenvalues of @xmath454}$ ] remain frozen when increasing @xmath159 . note that the asymptotic exponents of correlation decay for a semi - infinite chain are not the same as for an infinite one , i.e. the point spectra of @xmath454}$ ] and @xmath460 are in general different , however we have some indications to believe that their phase diagrams should agree , namely ergodic regimes in the ki model on semi - infinite chain model are in one - to - one correspondence with ergodic regimes of the model on infinite chain . however , the most remarkable feature of dynamics @xmath459 is the following . splitting the truncated semi - lattice as @xmath461=[0,m-1]\cup[m , n]$ ] and following the time evolution of an observable @xmath462}]^t a(0 ) = \sum_{\ve{s } } a^{(t)}_{(s_{0},\ldots s_n ) } { { | s_0,\ldots , s_n ) } } $ ] in terms of a ` super - wave - function ' @xmath463 , one can again define the reduced super - density matrix as @xmath464 the dynamical equation for @xmath465 in terms of @xmath466 is _ exactly the same _ as for doubly - infinite lattice , namely eqs . ( [ eq : rdynamics1],[eq : rdynamics2 ] ) . hence also the conjecture ( [ eq : scaling ] ) on scaling invariance of @xmath446 should be the same for the two lattice topologies . however , numerical computations are much easier and thus the results are more suggestive for the semi - infinite case . in log scale ( units are arbitrary ) versus the partial tracing index @xmath143 , for cases qc ( a ) , ne ( b ) and in ( c ) . diamonds , stars , and squares represent data for the semi - infinite ki lattice with truncation size @xmath467 , ( diamonds , stars ) and @xmath468 ( squares ) , all for @xmath469 . finite number of time steps @xmath470 ( diamonds ) , just before the absorbing boundary affects any of the data shown , is compared to steady state observable @xmath471 ( stars ) . in the non - integrable cases ( a , b ) , data are compared also with steady state @xmath471 simulation of the same local initial observable @xmath472 on the two - sided ( doubly - infinite ) ki lattice with truncation size @xmath473 ( @xmath364 ) , and @xmath474 ( triangles ) . , width=604 ] let us now discuss some numerical results . we have always started from local initial operator @xmath472 . we took @xmath159 as large as allowed by existing computing resources , namely @xmath467 for the semi - infinite chain and @xmath473 for the infinite chain , and compared the data for asymptotic matrices @xmath475 ( in numerics @xmath58 has been chosen such that the results converged , typically @xmath476 ) with finite time data @xmath477 where time @xmath478 was set as large as allowed so that the data were still exact and no truncation was needed , typically @xmath479 . in all cases , numerical results were quite insensitive to small changes in truncation order @xmath159 . first we have computed the scaling of the principal matrix element , or the _ partial norms _ @xmath480 which , assuming ( [ eq : scaling ] ) , should asymptotically scale as @xmath481 ( see fig.[fig : scalsinorm ] ) . if asymptotic dynamics @xmath449 is determined by normalizable eigenvectors of @xmath459 , which necessarily correspond to uni - modular eigenvalues , then we should have @xmath482 . in qc case a clear scaling was observed for both topologies ( @xmath483 and @xmath484 ) with the same exponent @xmath448 , however the exponent was slightly different for @xmath475 and @xmath477 . in the cases of non - ergodic dynamics ( ne and in ) the results for two topologies were quite different . for semi - infinite topology we find very clearly that @xmath485 indicating that @xmath486 and even @xmath487 can be written as @xmath343 convergent sums of local operators . for initial tracing index @xmath488 , and @xmath489 ( diamonds ) , @xmath490 ( stars ) , @xmath491 ( squares ) , @xmath492 ( triangles ) , for non - integrable cases of ki chain on semi - infinite lattice truncated at @xmath467 , namely for case qc ( a , b ) , and case ne ( d , e ) . finite time data at @xmath470 kicks are shown in ( a , d ) , while steady state observables @xmath471 are analyzed in ( b , e ) , all starting from initial observable @xmath493 . for comparison , asymptotic steady state @xmath471 data for two - sided , doubly infinite ki chain , truncated at @xmath494 , and with initial tracing index @xmath474 , are shown in ( c , f ) , namely for qc case ( c ) and ne case ( f ) . note that data in plot ( b ) are practically exactly overlapping.,width=604 ] as a more quantitative test of conjecture ( [ eq : scaling ] ) we compare the upper - left ( ` most important ' ) @xmath252 block of the super density matrix scaled to a unit principal element @xmath495 . in fig.[fig : scalsi1d ] we plot the diagonal elements @xmath496 for different @xmath143 , while in fig.[fig : scalsi2d ] we plot 2d charts of the entire scaled density matrices @xmath497 . indeed we find for qc case that the matrix @xmath497 is practically insensitive to increasing truncation ( @xmath143 ) and to topology of the lattice ( semi - infinite versus infinite ) , both for finite time @xmath498 and ` steady - state ' @xmath471 . on the other hand , in non - ergodic cases , the scaling ( [ eq : scaling ] ) is typically broken . however , it seems to be observed in the steady state ( @xmath498 ) of ne case , which is ( in our setting ) probably a non - physical but still quite robust effect due to truncation ( a kind of absorbing boundary condition ) . - the grayness level is proportional to @xmath499 - for initial tracing index @xmath469 , and @xmath500 ( columns plots ) , for six different cases , qc , ne , and in of truncated semi - infinite ki lattice ( @xmath467 ) , at finite time @xmath470 , and asymptotic steady state @xmath471 ( row plots ) , always starting form initial observable @xmath493 . @xmath252 ` most important ' matrix elements are plotted with the matrix site @xmath501 at lower - left corner.,width=604 ] summarizing this subsection , we conjectured that in the regime of quantum chaos reduced super - density matrices of time - evolved observables typically obey the scaling law ( [ eq : scaling ] ) with the exponent @xmath448 which only depends on global dynamics on quasi - local algebra of observables and not on a particular choice of initial observable . we expect that accurate numerical calculations of exponent @xmath448 would be possible within a certain quantum dynamic renormalization group scheme , however its precise formulation at present remains an open problem . in section [ sect : mps ] , further elaborated in subsection [ sect : opent ] , we have proposed an entanglement in operator space of quasi - local algebra as a possible new measure of quantum algorithmic complexity . here we would like to compare this briefly to some established proposals of quantum dynamical entropy , such as for example cnt entropy @xcite or af entropy @xcite , both being ideally suited for a quantum dynamical system formulated in terms of time automorphism @xmath242 , tracial invariant state @xmath502 , and quasi - local @xmath230 algebra @xmath231 . we shall here briefly review af entropy which is conceptually simpler . let us start by taking a set of say @xmath503 elements @xmath504 of @xmath231 which form a partition of unity , namely @xmath505 . following the dynamics up to integer time @xmath58 , @xmath506 , we construct a set of @xmath507 elements depending on a multi - index @xmath508 , namely @xmath509 from the homomorphism property and unitality of dynamics it follows that @xmath510 is also a partition of unity , @xmath511^ * a^{(t)}_{\ve{\alpha } } = \one $ ] . hence using an invariant state @xmath502 one can form a _ positive _ , _ hermitian _ , _ trace - one _ , @xmath512 matrix @xmath513^ * a^{(t)}_{\ve{\alpha}}\right).\ ] ] @xmath514 can clearly be interpreted as a density matrix pertaining to dynamically generated partition , and its von neumann entropy generated per unit time defines the af entropy @xmath515,\ ] ] where , strictly speaking , supremum over all possible generating partitions has to be taken . it is not surprising that practical evaluation of @xmath516 is impossible except for rather trivial cases , such as dynamics generated by shift automorphism @xmath517 @xcite . however , one can easily show that a related _ linear af entropy _ @xmath518 ^ 2 , \label{eq : aflin}\ ] ] is tractable much more easily , while the behaviour of @xmath519 and @xmath520 is likely to be similar in practice . the key observation is to write the purity @xmath521 ^ 2 = \sum_{\ve{\alpha},\ve{\beta } } \rho^{(t)}_{\ve{\beta},\ve{\alpha } } \rho^{(t)}_{\ve{\alpha},\ve{\beta}}$ ] in terms of dynamics over a product algebra @xmath522 , with time automorphism @xmath523 and an invariant state @xmath524 . to this product structure we add a linear map @xmath525 depending on a generating partition @xmath526 @xmath527 if @xmath528 is a unit element in @xmath231 then @xmath529 is a unit element in @xmath530 , and purity can be written using a transfer - matrix - like approach as @xmath531^t ( \one \times \one)\right\ } .\ ] ] the idea can be worked out in detail for a _ complete _ generating partition of a local sub - algebra @xmath532}$ ] of size @xmath533 . there it turns out that , due to locality of dynamics ( [ eq : locality ] ) , the resulting purity is _ independent _ of @xmath534 , i.e. the supremum ( [ eq : aflin ] ) is already achieved by a rather modest partition of @xmath535 elements , and the map @xmath536 can be _ factored _ into a direct product of two maps acting separately on _ two independent copies _ of a _ semi - infinite lattice_. leaving out some technical details of derivation , the final result reads as follows . let us consider a time dependent @xmath537 matrix @xmath538 , representing a state on @xmath539 , with initial value @xmath540 , and dynamics given by the following completely positive matrix map @xmath541}\left\{t_{t+1 } \left [ e_{00}\otimes \one_4\otimes q(t ) \otimes e_{00 } \right ] t^\dagger_{t+1}\right\ } , \label{eq : qdynamics}\ ] ] where @xmath542 } r)_{j , k } = \sum_{s=0}^{15 } r_{s + 16j , s+16k } $ ] traces out two least important qudits , and unitary time evolution matrix @xmath543 is given in ( [ eq : rdynamics2 ] ) . then the purity , and linear dynamical entropy ( lde ) , are simply given as @xmath544 ^ 2 $ ] , @xmath545 , respectively . the asymptotic increase of @xmath79 per unit time yields the linear af entropy ( [ eq : aflin ] ) . again , for practical calculations it is convenient to consider truncation of matrices @xmath538 after each iteration ( [ eq : qdynamics ] ) , say at dimension @xmath278 . in fig . [ fig : smb ] we plot lde for different cases of ki dynamics , and we observe that lde is always clearly growing linearly @xmath546 , so the af entropy is always strictly positive , even in non - ergodic ( ne ) and integrable ( in ) cases , and that the results are robust and stable against changing the truncation order @xmath299 . perhaps this finding appears surprising , but one has to bear in mind that af and cnt entropies can be positive even for simpler dynamics , such as quasi - free flows on @xmath230 algebras . for _ ergodic _ dynamical systems on @xmath230 algebras one can use shannon - mcmillan - breiman ( smb ) theorem ( for classical smb theorem see e.g. @xcite , and @xcite for a possible quantum extension ) , which states that for _ typical _ sequences @xmath547 , _ multi - time correlation function _ ( mtcf ) should decay exponentially @xmath548 where the exponent @xmath81 , which should be essentially independent of @xmath549 , is equal to a dynamical entropy of the map @xmath242 with respect to an invariant state @xmath502 . for an interesting application of smb theorem in the context of quantum dynamical chaos see ref . @xcite . in our numerical experiments we considered truncated dynamics @xmath408}$ ] , writing truncation order as @xmath550 , and computed two kinds of mtcf : ( i ) for a uniform sequence @xmath551 , where @xmath552 ( or @xmath553 in which case the truncated lattice was placed as @xmath554 $ ] , hence @xmath555 ) , we estimated mtcf ( [ eq : mctf ] ) as @xmath556 } a_1 \at_{[-n , n ] } \cdots \at_{[-n , n ] } a_1}$ ] . ( ii ) for a random sequence @xmath547 , we took a complete generating partition @xmath557 on @xmath558}$ ] with @xmath559 elements , for @xmath560 or @xmath561 , and computed an average square modulus of mtcf @xmath562 } a_{\alpha_1 } \at_{[-n , n ] } \cdots \at_{[-n , n ] } a_{\alpha_{t-1}}}|^2 \rangle}}$ ] over 20 randomly sampled sequences @xmath547 . in both cases ( i , ii ) we have found a rather good agreement between @xmath563 and lde @xmath79 for the case of quantum chaotic dynamics ( fig . [ fig : smb ] ) . for average random mtcf we found rather good agreement even for non - ergodic cases ( ne and in ) , however mtcf for the uniform sequence exhibited big oscillating fluctuations there , indicating simply that smb theorem does hold for non - ergodic dynamics of ki model . summarizing , it seems that af entropy , even though it very cleanly generalizes the concept of kolmogorov - sinai classical dynamical entropy to quantum dynamical systems , can not be used as an indicator of quantum chaos or an indicator of computational complexity of quantum dynamical systems . nevertheless , it has to be stressed that quantum dynamical entropies can be related to the notion of quantum algorithmic complexity , mentioned in section [ sect : mps ] , by a quantum version of brudno theorem established in ref . in the present article we have reviewed several possible approaches to describe dynamic instabilities , relaxation phenomena , and computation complexity in the simple model of one - dimensional non - integrable locally interacting quantum many body dynamics . we have argued that the essential non - equilibrium statistical properties of quantum dynamical systems - in the absence of idealized external baths - may be crucially related to the integrability of the system , or in the complementary case , to the existence of the regime of quantum chaos . the general flavor which remains after such studies is that the non - integrable quantum many body problem at high temperature will preclude any exact and complete solution by its very nature . still it is hoped that a more complete ergodic theory of such systems could be developed , allowing for example for exact calculation of relaxation rates , scaling exponents of resonance eigenvectors , etc . it has been shown in many cases that integrable quantum systems have anomalous non - equilibrium statistical mechanics at high temperature , for example they exhibit ballistic transport . this can easily be understood as being a consequence of existence of ( an infinite sequence of ) exact local conservation laws which prevents quantum ergodicity , similarly as existence of canonical action variables in classical integrable systems prevents classical ergodicity . an interesting open question is the following : how strong integrability breaking perturbation is needed , in generic cases , to break all the exact conservation laws and yield normal ( diffusive ) transport ? in other words : a quantum kam theory is needed ! numerical experiments shown in this paper suggest an interesting possibility , namely that in some cases a finite , critical perturbation strength is required . i would like to thank g. casati , t. gorin , c. mejia - monasterio , t. h. seligman , and m. nidari , for collaborations on related projects and acknowledge stimulating discussions with f. benatti , j. eisert , s. fishman and p. zoller . this work has been supported by the grants p1 - 0044 , and j1 - 7347 of slovenian research agency . 9 g. vidal , phys . rev . lett . * 91 * , 147902 ( 2003 ) ; _ ibid . _ * 93 * , 040502 ( 2004 ) ; s. r. white and a. e. feiguin , phys . rev . lett . * 93 * , 076401 ( 2004 ) ; a. j. daley , c. kollath , u. schollw " ock and g. vidal , j. stat . mech . * 4 * , p04005 ( 2005 ) ; g. vidal , cond - mat/0605597 . d. gobert , c. kollath , u. schollw " ock and g. sch " utz , phys . e * 71 * , 036102 ( 2005 ) ; u. schollw " ock and s. r. white , in g. g. batrouni , and d. poilblanc ( eds . ) : effective models for low - dimensional strongly correlated systems , p.155 , aip , melville , new york ( 2006 ) . f. verstraete , j.j . garc ' ia - ripoll and j.i . cirac , phys.rev.lett . * 93 * , 207204 ( 2004 ) ; m. zwolak and g. vidal , phys.rev.lett . * 93 * , 207205 ( 2004 ) ; a.e . feiguin and s.r . white , phys.rev.b * 72 * , 220401(r ) ( 2005 ) . r. sch " affer , h .- j . st " ockmann , t. gorin , t. h. seligman , phys . lett . * 95 * , 184102 ( 2005 ) ; r. sch " affer , t. gorin , h .- j . st " ockmann , t. h. seligman , new j. phys . * 7 * , 152 ( 2005 ) ; t. gorin , t. h. seligman and r. l. weaver , phys . rev . e * 73 * , 015202(r ) ( 2006 ) . o. bratelli and d. w. robinson , _ operator algebras and quantum statistical mechanics i , ii _ , ( springer - verlag , 1979 , 1981 ) ; b. simon , _ the statistical mechanics of lattice gases _ , ( princeton university press , 1993 ) . Abstract:

Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.

Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered . Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video . Paper: modern atomic spectroscopy studies the structure and properties of practically any atom of the periodic table as well as of ions of any ionization degree . particular attention is paid to their energy spectra . for the investigations of many - electron atoms and ions , it is of great importance to combine experimental and theoretical methods . nowadays the possibilities of theoretical spectroscopy are much enlarged thanks to the wide use of powerful computers . theoretical methods utilized must be fairly universal and must ensure reasonably accurate values of physical quantities studied . many - electron atom usually is considered as many - body problem and is described by the wave function constructed from the wave functions of one electron , moving in the central nuclear charge field and in the screening field of the remaining electrons . then the wave function of this electron may be represented as a product of radial and spin - angular parts . the radial part is usually found by solving various modifications of the hartree - fock equations and can be represented in a numerical or analytical forms ( froese fischer @xcite ) whereas the angular part is expressed in terms of spherical functions . then the wave function of the whole atom can be constructed in some standard way ( cowan @xcite , jucys and savukynas @xcite , nikitin and rudzikas @xcite ) starting with these one - electron functions and may be used further on for the calculations of any matrix elements representing physical quantities . for obtaining the values of atomic quantities it is necessary to solve so - called eigenvalue problem @xmath1 where @xmath2 is the wave function of the system under investigation and @xmath3 is its hamiltonian . in order to obtain accurate values of atomic quantities it is necessary to account for relativistic and correlation effects . it turned out that for very large variety of atoms and their ionization degrees the relativistic effects may be taken into account fairly accurately as breit - pauli corrections ( nikitin and rudzikas @xcite , rudzikas @xcite ) . it is convenient to present the hamiltonian as consisting of two parts in breit - pauli approach , namely , @xmath4 where @xmath5 is the non - relativistic hamiltonian and @xmath6 stands for the relativistic contibution . non - relativistic hamiltonian is the sum of the kinetic energy of electrons @xmath7 , their potential energy @xmath8 , and the electrostatic electron interaction @xmath9 @xmath10 the first two terms , @xmath7 and @xmath8 are the one - particle operators , whereas the third term , @xmath9 , is two - particle operator . the @xmath6 may also be subdivided into non - fine structure and fine structure contributions @xmath11 the non - fine structure contributions @xmath12 shift non - relativistic energy levels without any splitting of them . the mass - velocity term @xmath13 describes the variation of mass with velocity . the one- and two - body darwin ( contact ) terms @xmath14 and @xmath15 are the corrections of the one - electron dirac equation due to the retardation of the electromagnetic field produced by an electron ( contact interaction ) . the spin - spin - contact term @xmath16 accounts for the interaction of the spin magnetic moments of two electrons occupying the same space . the orbit - orbit interaction @xmath17 accounts for the interaction of two orbital moments . the fine - structure contributions @xmath18 split the non - relativistic energy levels ( terms ) into a series of closely - spaced levels . the most important of these is the nuclear spin - orbit interaction @xmath19 ( spin - own - orbit ) representing the interaction of the spin and angular magnetic moments of an electron in the field of the nucleus . the spin - other - orbit @xmath20 and spin - spin @xmath21 contributions in a rough sense may be viewed as corrections to the nuclear spin - orbit interaction due to the presence of the other electrons in the system . unfortunately , practical calculations show that all realistic atomic hamiltonians do not lead straightforwardly to eigenvalue problem ( [ eq : sch ] ) . actually we have to calculate all non - zero matrix elements of the hamiltonian considered including those non - diagonal with respect to electronic configurations , then to form energy matrix , to diagonalize it , obtaining in this way the values of the energy levels as well as the eigenfunctions ( the wave functions in the intermediate coupling scheme ) . the latter may be used then to calculate electronic transitions as well as the other properties and processes . such a necessity raises special requirements for the theory . the total matrix element of each term of the energy operator in the case of complex electronic configuration will consist of matrix elements , describing the interaction inside each shell of equivalent electrons as well as between these shells . going beyond the single - configuration approximation we have to be able to take into account in the same way non - diagonal , with respect to configurations , matrix elements . to find the expressions for the matrix elements of all terms of the hamiltonian considered for complex electronic configurations , having several open shells , is a task very far from the trivial one . a considerable part of the effort must be devoted to coping with integrations over spin - angular variables , occurring in the matrix elements of the operators under consideration . this paper presents the general methodology , leading to optimal expressions for operators and matrix elements . a number of methodologies to calculate the angular parts of matrix elements exists in literature . many existing codes for integrating the spin - angular parts of matrix elements ( glass @xcite , glass and hibbert @xcite , grant @xcite , burke _ @xcite ) are based on the computational scheme proposed by fano @xcite . this methodology is based on having the total wavefunction of an atom built from the antisymmetrized wavefunctions of separate shells , and this antisymmetrization is done via coefficients of fractional parentage . the shells are coupled one to another via their angular momenta . so , the finding of matrix elements amounts to finding the recoupling matrices and the coefficients of fractional parentage . suppose that we have a bra function with @xmath22 shells in @xmath0 coupling : @xmath23{c } \psi _ u^{bra}\left ( lsm_lm_s\right ) \equiv \\ \equiv ( n_1l_1n_2l_2 ... n_ul_u\alpha _ 1l_1s_1\alpha _ 2l_2s_2 ... \alpha _ ul_us_u{\cal a}lsm_lm_s| \end{array}\ ] ] and a ket function : @xmath24{c } \psi _ u^{ket}\left ( l^{\prime } s^{\prime } m^{\prime}_lm^{\prime}_s\right ) \equiv \\ n_ul_u\alpha _ 1^{\prime } l_1^{\prime } s_1^{\prime } \alpha _ 2^{\prime } l_2^{\prime } s_2^{\prime } ... \alpha _ u^{\prime } l_u^{\prime } s_u^{\prime } { \cal a}^{\prime } l^{\prime } s^{\prime}m^{\prime}_lm^{\prime}_s ) , \end{array}\ ] ] where @xmath25 stands for all intermediate quantum numbers , depending on the order of coupling of momenta @xmath26 . using the wigner - eckart theorem in @xmath0 space we shift from the matrix element of any two - particle operator @xmath27 between functions ( [ eq : ma - a ] ) and ( [ eq : ma - b ] ) to the submatrix element ( reduced matrix ) @xmath28 of this operator . when the two - particle operator acts upon four distinct shells , then the finding general expressions of matrix elements , according to methodology by fano @xcite , is based upon the formula @xmath29{c } ( \psi _ u^{bra}\left ( ls\right ) || \widehat{g}^{\left ( \kappa _ 1\kappa _ 2k,\sigma_1\sigma _ 2k\right ) } \sim \displaystyle { \sum_{n_{i } \lambda _ { i } , n_{j } \lambda _ { j } , n_{i^{\prime } } \lambda _ { i^{\prime } } , n_{j^{\prime } } \lambda _ { j^{\prime } } } } \left ( -1\right ) ^\delta \left [ n_{i } \left ( n_{j}-\delta(i , j ) \right ) n_{i^{\prime}}^{\prime } \left ( n_{j^{\prime}}^{\prime}-\delta(i^{\prime},j^{\prime } ) \right ) \right]^{1/2 } \times \\ \times \left ( l_{i}^{n_{i}}\;\alpha_{i } l_{i}s_{i}||l_{i}^{n_{i}-1}\;\left ( \alpha_{i}^{\prime } l^{\prime}_{i } s^{\prime } _ { i } \right ) , l_{i } \right ) \left ( l_{j}^{n_{j}}\;\alpha_{j } l_{j}s_{j}||l_{j}^{n_{j}-1}\;\left ( \alpha_{j}^{\prime } l^{\prime}_{j } s^{\prime } _ { j } \right ) , l_{j } \right ) \times \\ \times \left ( l_{i^{\prime } } ^{n_{i^{\prime } } } \;\alpha_{i^{\prime } } l_{i^{\prime } } s_{i^{\prime } } ||l_{i^{\prime } } ^{n_{i^{\prime } } -1}\;\left ( \alpha_{i^{\prime } } ^{\prime } l^{\prime}_{i^{\prime } } s^{\prime } _ { i^{\prime } } \right ) , l_{i^{\prime } } \right ) \left ( l_{j^{\prime } } ^{n_{j^{\prime } } } \;\alpha_{j^{\prime } } l_{j^{\prime } } s_{j^{\prime } } ||l_{j^{\prime } } ^{n_{j^{\prime } } -1}\;\left ( \alpha_{j^{\prime } } ^{\prime } l^{\prime}_{j^{\prime } } s^{\prime } _ { j^{\prime } } \right ) , l_{j^{\prime } } \right ) \times \\ \times \left\ { r_{d } \left ( \lambda _ i,\lambda _ j,\lambda _ i^{\prime } , \lambda _ j^{\prime } , \kappa_1 , \kappa_2 , \kappa , \sigma_1 , \sigma_2 , \sigma , \lambda ^{bra } , \lambda ^{ket } \right ) \right . \\ \times \left ( 1 + \delta(i , j ) \delta(i^{\prime } , j^{\prime } ) \right)^{-1 } \left ( n_i\lambda _ in_j\lambda _ j|| g^{\left ( \kappa _ 1\kappa _ 2k,\sigma_1\sigma _ 2k\right ) } - r_{e } \left ( \lambda _ i,\lambda _ j,\lambda _ i^{\prime } , \lambda _ j^{\prime } , \kappa_1 , \kappa_2 , \kappa , \sigma_1 , \sigma_2 , \sigma , \lambda ^{bra } , \lambda ^{ket } \right ) \\ \times \left . \left ( 1 + \delta(i , j ) ) ( 1 - \delta(i^{\prime } , j^{\prime } ) \right ) \left ( n_i\lambda _ in_j\lambda _ j|| g^{\left ( \kappa _ 1\kappa _ 2k,\sigma_1\sigma _ 2k\right ) } \right\ } , \end{array}\ ] ] where @xmath30 is a phase factor , ( see for example in @xcite ) , @xmath31 is the array for the bra function shells terms , and similarly for @xmath32 . the coefficient @xmath33 is a fractional parentage coefficient , and coefficients @xmath34 and @xmath35 are the recoupling matrices in @xmath36 and @xmath37 - spaces of direct and exchange terms , respectively . for more detailes on recoupling matrices see in grant @xcite , burke _ et al _ @xcite . the summation in expression ( [ eq : ma - c ] ) implies that the quantum numbers @xmath38 , @xmath39 of all participating shells are included . there are four such pairs of @xmath38 , @xmath39 in the sum . in essence , the fano calculation scheme consists of evaluating recoupling matrices . although such an approach uses classical racah algebra @xcite on the level of coefficients of fractional parentage , it may be necessary to carry out multiple summations over intermediate terms . due to these summations and the complexity of the recoupling matrix itself , the associated computer codes become rather time consuming . jucys and vizbarait . e @xcite proposed to use the two - electron coefficients of fractioanl parentage instead of ordinary ones , in matrix elements calculations , but even that did not solve the abovementioned problems . a solution to this problem was found by burke _ they tabulated separate standard parts of recoupling matrices along with coefficients of fractional parentage at the beginning of a calculation and used them further on to calculate the needed coefficients . computer codes by glass @xcite , glass and hibbert @xcite , grant @xcite , burke _ @xcite utilize the program njsym ( burke @xcite ) or njgraf ( bar - shalom and klapisch @xcite ) for the calculation of recoupling matrices . both are rather time consuming when calculating matrix elements of complex operators or electronic configurations with many open shells . in order to simplify the calculations , cowan @xcite suggested that matrix elements be grouped into classes ( see cowan @xcite figure 13 - 5 ) . unfortunately , this approach was not generalized to all two - electron operators . perhaps for this reason cowan s approach is not very popular although the program itself , based on this approach , is widely used . many approaches for the calculation of spin - angular coefficients ( glass @xcite , glass and hibbert @xcite , grant @xcite , burke _ et al _ @xcite ) are based on the usage of racah algebra only on the level of coefficients of fractional parentage . a few authors ( jucys and savukynas @xcite , cowan @xcite ) utilize the unit tensors , simplifying the calculations in this way , because use can be made of the tables of unit tensors and selection rules can be used prior to computation to check whether the spin - angular coefficients are zero or not . moreover , the recoupling matrices themselves have a simpler form . unfortunately , these ideas were applied only to diagonal matrix elements with respect to configurations , though cowan @xcite suggested the usage of unit tensors for non - diagonal ones as well . all the above mentioned approaches were applied in the coordinate representation . the second quantization formalism ( judd @xcite , rudzikas and kaniauskas @xcite and rudzikas @xcite ) has a number of advantages compared to coordinate representation . first of all , it is much easier to find algebraic expressions for complex operators and their matrix elements , when relying on second quantization formalism . it has contributed significantly to the successful development of perturbation theory ( see lindgren and morrison @xcite , merkelis _ et al _ @xcite , and orthogonal operators ( uylings @xcite ) , where three - particle operators already occur . uylings @xcite suggested a fairly simple approach for dealing with separate cases of three - particle operators . moreover , in the second quantization approach the quasispin formalism was efficiently developed by innes @xcite , pakauskas _ et al _ @xcite , rudzikas and kaniauskas @xcite , fano and rau @xcite . the main advantage of this approach is that applying the quasispin method for calculating the matrix elements of any operator , we can use all advantages of the new version of racah algebra ( see rudzikas @xcite ) for integration of spin - angular part of any one- and two - particle operator . for example , the reduced coefficients of fractional parentage are independent of the occupation number of the shell ( see rudzikas and kaniauskas @xcite , gaigalas _ et al _ all this enabled merkelis and gaigalas @xcite to work out a general perturbation theory approach for complex cases of several open shells . in the paper by merkelis @xcite a detailed review of a version of graphical methodology is presented that allows one to represent the operators graphically and to find the matrix elements of these operators using diagrammatic technique . the majority of methods and computer codes of finding angular coefficients discussed above were faced with a number of problems , the main of these being : * the high demand of cpu time for calculating the angular parts of matrix elements even on the modern computer . therefore the high accuracy of characteristics of atomic quantities somtimes is even unattainable . * the methods are applicable in practice only for the comparatively simple systems , because in the programs based on classical racah algebra the treatment of recoupling matrices is rather complicated , especialy when finding the matrix elements of breit - pauli operators between complex configurations . * the configurations with open @xmath40-shells must often be included in theoretical calculations . this causes problems in a number of methodologies , because the complete account of @xmath40- shells implies using a large number of coefficients of fractional parentage . gaigalas and rudzikas @xcite , gaigalas _ @xcite , gaigalas _ @xcite , gaigalas _ et al _ @xcite and gaigalas and rudzikas @xcite suggested an efficient and general approach for finding the spin - angular parts of matrix elements of atomic interactions , relying on the combination of the second - quantization approach in the coupled tensorial form , the generalized graphical technique and angular momentum theory in orbital , spin and quasispin spaces as well as on the symetry properties of the quantities considered . this approach is free of previous shortcomings . it is the main goal of this work to present all this methodology consistently and in a unifying manner , paying the special attention to its main ideas . also , we aim at a detailed discussion of obtaining the efficient tensorial expressions of a two - particle operator , as well as the analytical expressions for recoupling matrices . in addition to that , in this work we aim at comparing this methodology to other calculation of angular coefficients schemes . from what is said above we see that the treatment of angular parts of matrix elements is a many - sided question . the classical scheme by fano was developed in various aspects . the methods were developed that used racah algebra @xcite on a higher level , or used the new version of the racah algebra ( angular momentum theory in orbital , spin and quasispin spaces ) ( see rudzikas @xcite ) . the ways were searched for , to obtain the expressions that had simpler recoupling matrices . in order to discuss all that in more detail , to compare the existing methods of obtaining the angular parts and to mark the advantages of one method or another , the finding angular parts must be looked at from different angles . thus , the first thing to discuss is the expression for any physical operator ( see sections 2,3,4 ) , because already the form of it determines the level of application of tensor algebra in the calculation of matrix elements of this operator . also , it is very important to make clear to what extent the racah algebra is exploited in one or another methodology of angular parts treatment . this helps to mark the advantages of one method against another ( see section 5 ) . in addition , it is of importance to compare the ways of calculating the recoupling matrix in various methods ( see section 6 ) . it is well known in the literature that a scalar two - particle operator may be presented the following tensorial form ( see jucys and savukynas @xcite , glass @xcite ) : @xmath41_{p - p}^{(k~k ) } , \ ] ] where @xmath42 is the radial part of operator , @xmath43 is a tensor acting upon the orbital and spin variables of the @xmath44-th function , @xmath45 , @xmath46 are the ranks of operator acting in orbital space , and @xmath47 , @xmath48 are the ranks of operator acting in spin space . all the above mentioned approaches were usually applied in the coordinate representation . now we will investigate into the second quantization formalism , which is broadly applied in atomic physics as well . a two - particle operator in second quantization method is written as follows : @xmath49 where @xmath50 , @xmath51 is the two - electron matrix element of operator @xmath52 , and @xmath53 is the electron creation and @xmath54 electron annihilation operators . meanwhile two tensorial forms are well known in second quantization . in the first form the operators of second quantization follow in the normal order : @xmath55{c } g_i^{\left ( \kappa_1 \kappa_2 k , \sigma_1 \sigma_2 k \right)}= \displaystyle { \sum_{n_il_i , n_jl_j , n_i^{\prime } l_i^{\prime } , n_j^{\prime } l_j^{\prime } } } \widehat{g}_i(ij , i^{\prime } j^{\prime } ) = \\ = -\frac 12 \displaystyle { \sum_{n_il_i , n_jl_j , n_i^{\prime } l_i^{\prime } , n_j^{\prime } l_j^{\prime } } } \displaystyle { \sum_{\kappa _ { 12}\kappa _ { 12}^{^{\prime } } \sigma _ { 12}\sigma _ { 12}^{^{\prime } } } } \displaystyle { \sum_p}\left ( -1\right ) ^{k - p}\left [ \kappa _ { 12},\kappa _ { 12}^{\prime } , \sigma _ { 12},\sigma _ { 12}^{\prime } \right ] ^{1/2}\times \\ \times \left ( n_i\lambda _ in_j\lambda _ j||g^{\left ( \kappa _ 1\kappa _ 2k,\sigma _ 1\sigma _ 2k\right ) } ||n_i^{\prime } \lambda _ i^{\prime } n_j^{\prime } \lambda _ j^{\prime } \right ) \times \\ \times \left\ { \begin{array}{ccc } l_i^{\prime } & l_j^{\prime } & \kappa _ { 12}^{\prime } \\ \kappa _ 1 & \kappa _ 2 & k \\ l_i & l_j & \kappa _ { 12 } \end{array } \right\ } \left\ { \begin{array}{ccc } s & s & \sigma _ { 12}^{\prime } \\ \sigma _ 1 & \sigma _ 2 & k \\ s & s & \sigma _ { 12 } \end{array } \right\ } \times \\ \times \left [ \left [ a^{\left ( \lambda _ i\right ) } \times a^{\left ( \lambda _ j\right ) } \right ] ^{\left ( \kappa _ { 12}\sigma _ { 12}\right ) } \times \left [ \stackrel{\sim } { a}^{\left ( \lambda _ i^{\prime } \right ) } \times \stackrel{% \sim } { a}^{\left ( \lambda _ j^{\prime } \right ) } \right ] ^{\left ( \kappa _ { 12}^{\prime } \sigma _ { 12}^{\prime } \right ) } \right ] _ { p - p}^{\left ( kk\right ) } , \end{array}\ ] ] where @xmath56 = \left ( 2a+1\right ) \left ( 2b+1\right ) $ ] , @xmath57 , @xmath58 is the two - electron submatrix ( reduced matrix ) element of operator @xmath59 and tensor @xmath60 is defined as ( see for example rudzikas @xcite ) @xmath61 the product of tensors @xmath62 ^{\left ( \kappa _ { 12}\sigma _ { 12}\right ) } \times \left [ \stackrel{\sim } { a}^{\left ( \lambda _ i^{\prime } \right ) } \times \stackrel{% \sim } { a}^{\left ( \lambda _ j^{\prime } \right ) } \right ] ^{\left ( \kappa _ { 12}^{\prime } \sigma _ { 12}^{\prime } \right ) } \right ] _ { p - p}^{\left ( kk\right ) } $ ] denotes tensorial part of operator @xmath63 . in another form the second quantization operators are coupled by pairs consisting of electron creation and annihilation operators . in coupled tensorial form : @xmath64{c } g_{ii}^{\left ( \kappa_1 \kappa_2 \kappa , \sigma_1 \sigma_2 \sigma \right)}= \displaystyle { \sum_{n_il_i , n_jl_j , n_i^{\prime } l_i^{\prime } , n_j^{\prime } l_j^{\prime } } } \widehat{g}_{ii}(ij , i^{\prime } j^{\prime } ) = \\ = \frac 12 \displaystyle { \sum_{n_il_i , n_jl_j , n_i^{\prime } l_i^{\prime } , n_j^{\prime } l_j^{\prime } } } \displaystyle { \sum_p}\left ( -1\right ) ^{k - p}\left ( n_i\lambda _ in_j\lambda _ j||g^{\left ( \kappa _ 1\kappa _ 2k,\sigma _ 1\sigma _ 2k\right ) } ||n_i^{\prime } \lambda _ i^{\prime } n_j^{\prime } \lambda _ j^{\prime } \right ) \times \\ \times \left\ { \left [ \kappa _ 1,\kappa _ 2,\sigma _ 1,\sigma _ 2\right ] ^{-1/2}\times \left [ \left [ a^{\left ( \lambda _ i\right ) } \times \stackrel{\sim } { a}^{\left ( \lambda _ i^{\prime } \right ) } \right ] ^{\left ( \kappa _ 1\sigma _ 1\right ) } \times \left [ a^{\left ( \lambda _ j\right ) } \times \stackrel{\sim } { a}^{\left ( \lambda _ j^{\prime } \right ) } \right ] ^{\left ( \kappa _ 2\sigma _ 2\right ) } \right ] _ { p - p}^{\left ( kk\right ) } - \right . -\left ( -1\right ) ^{l_i+l_j^{\prime } } \left\ { \begin{array}{ccc } \kappa _ 1 & \kappa _ 2 & k \\ l_j^{\prime } & l_i & l_j \end{array } \right\ } \left\ { \begin{array}{ccc } \sigma _ 1 & \sigma _ 2 & k \\ s & s & s \end{array } \right\ } \left [ a^{\left ( \lambda _ i\right ) } \times \stackrel{\sim } { a}% ^{\left ( \lambda _ j^{\prime } \right ) } \right ] _ { p - p}^{\left ( kk\right ) } \delta \left ( n_jl_j , n_i^{\prime } l_i^{\prime } \right ) \right\}. \end{array}\ ] ] the expression ( [ eq : op - c ] ) consists of only one tensorial product whereas ( [ eq : op - e ] ) has two , but the summation in the first formula is also over intermediate ranks @xmath65 , @xmath66 , @xmath67 and @xmath68 , complicating in this way the calculations . the advantages or disadvantages of these alternative forms of arbitrary two - electron operator may be revealed in practical applications . in these forms the product of second quantization operators denotes tensorial part of operator @xmath52 . for instance , the tensorial structure of electrostatic ( coulomb ) electron interaction operator is @xmath69 ( jucys and savukynas @xcite ) , and only the two - electron submatrix elements @xmath70 of these operators are different . in the case of electrostatic interaction : @xmath71{c } \left ( n_i\lambda _ in_j\lambda _ j||g_{coulomb}^{\left ( kk0,000\right ) } ||n_i^{\prime } \lambda _ i^{\prime } n_j^{\prime } \lambda _ j^{\prime } \right ) = \\ = 2\left [ k\right ] ^{1/2}\left ( l_i||c^{\left ( k\right ) } ||l_i^{\prime } \right ) \left ( l_j||c^{\left ( k\right ) } ||l_j^{\prime } \right ) r_k\left ( n_il_in_i^{\prime } l_i^{\prime } , n_jl_jn_j^{\prime } l_j^{\prime } \right ) . \end{array}\ ] ] from ( [ eq : op - f ] ) , by ( [ eq : op - c ] ) and ( [ eq : op - e ] ) , we finally obtain the following two secondly quantized expressions for coulomb operator ( see merkelis _ @xcite ) : @xmath72{c } \widehat{v}_i=-\frac 12 \displaystyle { \sum_{n_il_in_jl_jn_i^{\prime } l_i^{\prime } n_j^{\prime } l_j^{\prime } } } \displaystyle { \sum_{\kappa _ { 12}\sigma _ { 12}k}}\left ( -1\right ) ^{l_j+l_i^{\prime } + k+\kappa _ { 12}}\left [ \kappa _ { 12},\sigma _ { 12}\right ] ^{1/2}\left ( l_i||c^{\left ( k\right ) } ||l_i^{\prime } \right ) \times \\ \times \left ( l_j||c^{\left ( k\right ) } ||l_j^{\prime } \right ) r_k\left ( n_il_in_i^{\prime } l_i^{\prime } , n_jl_jn_j^{\prime } l_j^{\prime } \right ) \left\ { \begin{array}{ccc } l_i & l_i^{\prime } & k \\ l_j^{\prime } & l_i & \kappa _ { 12 } \end{array } \right\ } \times \\ \times \left [ \left [ a^{\left ( \lambda _ i\right ) } \times a^{\left ( \lambda _ j\right ) } \right ] ^{\left ( \kappa _ { 12}\sigma _ { 12}\right ) } \times \left [ \stackrel{\sim } { a}^{\left ( \lambda _ i^{\prime } \right ) } \times \stackrel{% \sim } { a}^{\left ( \lambda _ j^{\prime } \right ) } \right ] ^{\left ( \kappa _ { 12}\sigma _ { 12}\right ) } \right ] ^{\left ( 00\right ) } , \end{array}\ ] ] @xmath73{c } \widehat{v}_{ii}= \displaystyle { \sum_{n_il_in_jl_jn_i^{\prime } l_i^{\prime } n_j^{\prime } l_j^{\prime } } } \displaystyle { \sum_k}\left ( l_i||c^{\left ( k\right ) } ||l_i^{\prime } \right ) \left ( l_j||c^{\left ( k\right ) } ||l_j^{\prime } \right ) r_k\left ( n_il_in_i^{\prime } l_i^{\prime } , n_jl_jn_j^{\prime } l_j^{\prime } \right ) \times \\ \times \left\ { \left [ k\right ] ^{-1/2}\left [ \left [ a^{\left ( \lambda _ i\right ) } \times \stackrel{\sim } { a}^{\left ( \lambda _ i^{\prime } \right ) } \right ] ^{\left ( k0\right ) } \times \left [ a^{\left ( \lambda _ j\right ) } \times \stackrel{\sim } { a}^{\left ( \lambda _ j^{\prime } \right ) } \right ] ^{\left ( k0\right ) } \right ] ^{\left ( 00\right ) } + \right . \\ \left . + \left ( 2\left [ l_i\right ] \right ) ^{-1/2}\left [ a^{\left ( \lambda _ i\right ) } \times \stackrel{\sim } { a}% ^{\left ( \lambda _ j^{\prime } \right ) } \right ] ^{\left ( 00\right ) } \delta \left ( n_jl_j , n_i^{\prime } l_i^{\prime } \right ) \right\ } , \end{array}\ ] ] the tensorial expressions for orbit - orbit and other physical operators in second quantization form may be obtained in the same manner . it is worth mentioning that the expressions ( [ eq : op - g ] ) and ( [ eq : op - h ] ) embrace , already in an operator form , both the diagonal interaction terms , relative to configurations , and the non - diagonal ones . non - diagonal terms define the interaction between all the possible electron distributions over the configurations considered , differing by quantum numbers of not more than two electrons . the merits of representing operators in one form or another ( [ eq : op - g ] ) or ( [ eq : op - h ] ) are mostly determined by the technique used to find their matrix elements and quantities in terms of which they are expressed . in the paper gaigalas and rudzikas @xcite it was shown that the tensorial forms ( [ eq : op - a ] ) , ( [ eq : op - c ] ) , ( [ eq : op - e ] ) of two - particle operator do not take full advantage of tensor algebra . the most characteristic examples are when configurations considered have many open shells , or when the non - diagonal matrix elements are seeked . in the paper gaigalas _ et al _ @xcite the following optimal expression of two - particle operator is proposed , which allows one to make the most of the advantages of racah algebra ( see racah @xcite ) . @xmath74{c } \widehat{g}^{\left ( \kappa_1 \kappa_2 k , \sigma_1 \sigma_2 k \right)}\sim \displaystyle { \sum_{\alpha } } \displaystyle { \sum_{\kappa _ { 12},\sigma _ { 12},\kappa _ { 12}^{\prime } , \sigma _ { 12}^{\prime } } } \theta \left ( \xi \right ) \left\ { a_{p ,- p}^{\left ( kk\right ) } \left ( n_\alpha \lambda _ \alpha , \xi \right ) \delta \left ( u,1\right ) \right . \\ + \displaystyle { \sum_{\beta } } \left [ b^{\left ( \kappa _ { 12}\sigma _ { 12}\right ) } \left ( n_\alpha \lambda _ \alpha , \xi \right ) \times c^{\left ( \kappa _ { 12}^{\prime } \sigma _ { 12}^{\prime } \right ) } \left ( n_\beta \lambda _ \beta , \xi \right ) \right ] _ { p ,- p}^{\left ( kk\right ) } \delta \left ( u,2\right ) \\ + \displaystyle { \sum_{\beta \gamma } } \left [ \left [ d^{\left ( l_\alpha s\right ) } \times d^{\left ( l_\beta s\right ) } \right ] ^{\left ( \kappa _ { 12}\sigma _ { 12}\right ) } \times e^{\left ( \kappa _ { 12}^{\prime } \sigma _ { 12}^{\prime } \right ) } \left ( n_\gamma \lambda _ \gamma , \xi \right ) \right ] _ { p ,- p}^{\left ( kk\right ) } \delta \left ( u,3\right ) \\ \left . + \displaystyle { \sum_{\beta \gamma \delta } } \left [ \left [ d^{\left ( l_\alpha s\right ) } \times d^{\left ( l_\beta s\right ) } \right ] ^{\left ( \kappa _ { 12}\sigma _ { 12}\right ) } \times \left [ d^{\left ( l_\gamma s\right ) } \times d^{\left ( l_\delta s\right ) } \right ] ^{\left ( \kappa _ { 12}^{\prime } \sigma _ { 12}^{\prime } \right ) } \right ] _ { p ,- p}^{\left ( kk\right ) } \delta \left ( u,4\right ) \right\ } . \end{array}\ ] ] whereas in traditional expressions , e. g. ( [ eq : op - c ] ) , the summation runs over the principle and the orbital quantum numbers of open shells without detailing these , in the expression written above the first term represents the case of a two - particle operator acting upon the same shell @xmath75 , the second term corresponds to operator @xmath76 acting upon two different shells @xmath75 , @xmath77 . when operator @xmath76 acts upon three shells the third term in ( [ eq : op - i ] ) must be considered and when it acts upon four - the fourth one . we define in this expression the shells @xmath75 , @xmath77 , @xmath78 , @xmath79 to be different . the tensorial part of a two - particle operator is expressed in terms of operators of the type @xmath80 , @xmath81 , @xmath82 , @xmath83 , @xmath84 . they correspond to one of the forms : @xmath85 @xmath86 ^{\left ( \kappa _ 1\sigma _ 1\right ) } , \ ] ] @xmath87 ^{\left ( \kappa _ 1\sigma _ 1\right ) } \right ] ^{\left ( \kappa _ 2\sigma _ 2\right ) } , \ ] ] @xmath88 ^{\left ( \kappa _ 1\sigma _ 1\right ) } \times a_{m_{q3}}^{\left ( q\lambda \right ) } \right ] ^{\left ( \kappa _ 2\sigma _ 2\right ) } , \ ] ] @xmath89 ^{\left ( \kappa _ 1\sigma _ 1\right ) } \times \left [ a_{m_{q3}}^{\left ( q\lambda \right ) } \times a_{m_{q4}}^{\left ( q\lambda \right ) } \right ] ^{\left ( \kappa _ 2\sigma _ 2\right ) } \right ] ^{\left ( kk\right ) } , \ ] ] for example , if we take a two - particle operator acting upon two shells , then we see from expression ( [ eq : op - i ] ) that the angular part of two - particle operator is expressed via operators @xmath90 and @xmath91 . in a case when the operator @xmath76 acts in such a manner that two operators of second quantization act upon one shell and two act upon another , the @xmath90 and @xmath91 are expressed as ( [ eq : op - k ] ) . but in a case when three operators of second quantization act upon one shell and one acts upon another , then @xmath90 and @xmath91 are expressed either as ( [ eq : op - j ] ) and ( [ eq : op - l ] ) or ( [ eq : op - j ] ) and ( [ eq : op - m ] ) . in writing down the expressions ( [ eq : op - j ] ) - ( [ eq : op - n ] ) the quasispin formalism was used , where @xmath92 and @xmath93 are components of the tensor @xmath94 , having in additional quasispin space the rank @xmath95 and projections @xmath96 , i.e. @xmath97 and @xmath98 in the expression ( [ eq : op - i ] ) @xmath22 is the overall number of shells acted upon by a given tensorial product of creation / annihilation operators . parameter @xmath99 implies the whole array of parameters ( and sometimes an internal summation over some of these is implied , as well ) that connect the amplitudes @xmath100 of tensorial products of creation / annihilation operators in the expression ( [ eq : op - i ] ) to these tensorial products ( see gaigalas _ et al _ also , attention must be paid to the fact that the ranks @xmath101 , @xmath102 , @xmath103 , @xmath104 , @xmath105 and @xmath106 are also included into the parameter @xmath99 . the amplitudes @xmath107 are all proportional to the submatrix element of a two - particle operator @xmath108 , @xmath109 to obtain the expression of a concrete physical operator , analogous to expression ( [ eq : op - i ] ) , the tensorial structure of the operator and the two - particle matrix elements ( [ eq : op - r ] ) must be known . we shall investigate this now . the _ electrostatic ( coulomb ) electron interaction _ operator @xmath110 itself contains the tensorial structure @xmath111{c } h^{coulomb } \equiv \displaystyle { \sum_{k } } h_{coulomb}^{(kk0,000 ) } \end{array}\ ] ] and its submatrix element is @xmath112{c } \left ( n_i\lambda _ in_j\lambda _ j\left\| h_{coulomb}^{(kk0,000 ) } \right\| n_{i^{\prime } } \lambda _ { i^{\prime } } n_{j^{\prime } } \lambda _ { j^{\prime } } \right ) = \\ 2 [ k]^{1/2 } \left ( l_i\left\| c^{\left ( k \right ) } \right\| l_{i^{\prime } } \right ) \left ( l_j\left\| c^{\left ( k \right ) } \right\| l_{j^{\prime } } \right ) r_{k}\left ( n_il_i n_{i^{\prime } } l_{i^{\prime } } , n_jl_j n_{j^{\prime } } l_{j^{\prime } } \right ) . \end{array}\ ] ] the _ spin - spin _ operator @xmath113 itself contains tensorial structure of two different types , summed over @xmath114 ( gaigalas and rudzikas @xcite ) , @xmath115{c } h^{ss } \equiv \displaystyle { \sum_{k } } \left [ h_{ss}^{(k+1 k-1 2,112 ) } + h_{ss}^{(k-1 k+1 2,112 ) } \right ] . \end{array}\ ] ] their submatrix elements are ( jucys and savukynas @xcite ) @xmath116{c } \left ( n_i\lambda _ in_j\lambda _ j\left\| h_{ss}^{\left ( k+1k-12,112\right ) } \right\| n_{i^{\prime } } \lambda _ { i^{\prime } } n_{j^{\prime } } \lambda _ { j^{\prime } } \right ) = \frac 3 { \sqrt{5}}\sqrt{\left ( 2k+3\right ) ^{\left ( 5\right ) } } \times \\ \times \left ( l_i\left\| c^{\left ( k+1\right ) } \right\| l_{i^{\prime } } \right ) \left ( l_j\left\| c^{\left ( k-1\right ) } \right\| l_{j^{\prime } } \right ) n^{k-1}\left ( n_il_in_jl_j , n_{i^{\prime } } l_{i^{\prime } } n_{j^{\prime } } l_{j^{\prime } } \right ) \end{array}\ ] ] @xmath117{c } \left ( n_i\lambda _ in_j\lambda _ j\left\| h_{ss}^{\left ( k-1k+12,112\right ) } \right\| n_{i^{\prime } } \lambda _ { i^{\prime } } n_{j^{\prime } } \lambda _ { j^{\prime } } \right ) = \frac 3 { \sqrt{5}}\sqrt{\left ( 2k+3\right ) ^{\left ( 5\right ) } } \times \\ \times \left ( l_i\left\| c^{\left ( k-1\right ) } \right\| l_{i^{\prime } } \right ) \left ( l_j\left\| c^{\left ( k+1\right ) } \right\| l_{j^{\prime } } \right ) n^{k-1}\left ( n_jl_jn_il_i , n_{j^{\prime } } l_{j^{\prime } } n_{i^{\prime } } l_{i^{\prime } } \right ) , \end{array}\ ] ] where we use a shorthand notation @xmath118 and radial integral ( [ eq : ss - b ] ) , ( [ eq : ss - c ] ) is defined as in glass and hibbert @xcite : @xmath119{c } n^k\left ( n_il_in_jl_j , n_{i^{\prime } } l_{i^{\prime } } n_{j^{\prime } } l_{j^{\prime } } \right ) \\ = \frac{\alpha ^2}4\int_0^\infty \int_0^\infty p_i\left ( r_1\right ) p_j\left ( r_2\right ) \frac{r_2^k}{r_1^{k+3}}\epsilon ( r_1-r_2)p_{i^{\prime } } \left ( r_1\right ) p_{j^{\prime } } \left ( r_2\right ) dr_1dr_{2 , } \end{array}\ ] ] where @xmath120 is a heaviside step - function , @xmath121 the _ spin - other - orbit _ operator @xmath122 itself contains tensorial structure of six different types , summed over @xmath114 ( see gaigalas _ et al _ @xcite ) : @xmath123{c } h^{sso } \equiv \displaystyle { \sum_{k } } \left [ h_{sso}^{(k-1 k 1,101 ) } + h_{sso}^{(k-1 k 1,011)}+ \right . \\ h_{sso}^{(k k 1,101 ) } + h_{sso}^{(k k 1,011)}+ h_{sso}^{(k+1 k 1,101 ) } + h_{sso}^{(k+1 k 1,011 ) } \right ] . \end{array}\ ] ] their submatrix elements are : @xmath124{c } \left ( n_i\lambda _ in_j\lambda _ j\left\| h_{soo}^{\left ( k-1k1,\sigma _ 1\sigma _ 21\right ) } \right\| n_{i^{\prime } } \lambda _ { i^{\prime } } n_{j^{\prime } } \lambda _ { j^{\prime } } \right ) = 2\cdot 2^{\sigma _ 2}\left\ { \left ( 2k-1\right ) \left ( 2k+1\right ) \right . \\ \times \left . \left ( l_i+l_{i^{\prime } } -k+1\right ) \left ( k - l_i+l_{i^{\prime } } \right ) \left ( k+l_i - l_{i^{\prime } } \right ) \left ( k+l_i+l_{i^{\prime } } + 1\right ) \right\ } ^{1/2 } \\ \times \left ( k\right ) ^{-1/2}\left ( l_i\left\| c^{\left ( k\right ) } \right\| l_{i^{\prime } } \right ) \left ( l_j\left\| c^{\left ( k\right ) } \right\| l_{j^{\prime } } \right ) n^{k-2}\left ( n_jl_jn_il_i , n_{j^{\prime } } l_{j^{\prime } } n_{i^{\prime } } l_{i^{\prime } } \right ) , \end{array}\ ] ] @xmath125{c } \left ( n_i\lambda _ in_j\lambda _ j\left\| h_{soo}^{\left ( kk1,\sigma _ 1\sigma _ 21\right ) } \right\| n_{i^{\prime } } \lambda _ { i^{\prime } } n_{j^{\prime } } \lambda _ { j^{\prime } } \right ) = -2\cdot 2^{\sigma _ 2}\left ( 2k+1\right ) ^{1/2}\left ( l_i\left\| c^{\left ( k\right ) } \right\| l_{i^{\prime } } \right ) \\ \times \left ( l_j\left\| c^{\left ( k\right ) } \right\| l_{j^{\prime } } \right ) \left\ { \left ( k\left ( k+1\right ) \right ) ^{-1/2}\left ( l_i\left ( l_i+1\right ) -k\left ( k+1\right ) -l_{i^{\prime } } \left ( l_{i^{\prime } } + 1\right ) \right ) \right . \\ \times \left\ { \left ( k+1\right ) n^{k-2}\left ( n_jl_jn_il_i , n_{j^{\prime } } l_{j^{\prime } } n_{i^{\prime } } l_{i^{\prime } } \right ) -kn^k\left ( n_il_in_jl_j , n_{i^{\prime } } l_{i^{\prime } } n_{j^{\prime } } l_{j^{\prime } } \right ) \right\ } \\ \left . -2\left ( k\left ( k+1\right ) \right ) ^{1/2}v^{k-1}\left ( n_il_in_jl_j , n_{i^{\prime } } l_{i^{\prime } } n_{j^{\prime } } l_{j^{\prime } } \right ) \right\ } , \end{array}\ ] ] @xmath126{c } \left ( n_i\lambda _ in_j\lambda _ j\left\| h_{soo}^{\left ( k+1k1,\sigma _ 1\sigma _ 21\right ) } \right\| n_{i^{\prime } } \lambda _ { i^{\prime } } n_{j^{\prime } } \lambda _ { j^{\prime } } \right ) = 2\cdot 2^{\sigma _ 2}\left\ { \left ( 2k+1\right ) \left ( 2k+3\right ) \right . \\ \times \left . \left ( l_i+l_{i^{\prime } } -k\right ) \left ( k - l_i+l_{i^{\prime } } + 1\right ) \left ( k+l_i - l_{i^{\prime } } + 1\right ) \left ( k+l_i+l_{i^{\prime } } + 2\right ) \right\ } ^{1/2 } \\ \times \left ( k+1\right ) ^{-1/2}\left ( l_i\left\| c^{\left ( k\right ) } \right\| l_{i^{\prime } } \right ) \left ( l_j\left\| c^{\left ( k\right ) } \right\| l_{j^{\prime } } \right ) n^k\left ( n_il_in_jl_j , n_{i^{\prime } } l_{i^{\prime } } n_{j^{\prime } } l_{j^{\prime } } \right ) . \end{array}\ ] ] the radial integrals in ( [ eq : soo - b ] ) - ( [ eq : soo - d ] ) are ( see glass and hibbert @xcite ) : @xmath127{c } v^k\left ( n_il_in_jl_j , n_{i^{\prime } } l_{i^{\prime } } n_{j^{\prime } } l_{j^{\prime } } \right ) \\ = \frac{\alpha ^2}4\int_0^\infty \int_0^\infty p_i\left ( r_1\right ) p_j\left ( r_2\right ) \frac{r_{<}^{k-1}}{r_{>}^{k+2}}r_2\frac \partial { \partial r_1}p_{i^{\prime } } \left ( r_1\right ) p_{j^{\prime } } \left ( r_2\right ) dr_1dr_2 . \end{array}\ ] ] the tensorial form of _ orbit - orbit _ operator is ( see eissner _ @xcite ) @xmath128 the sum of submatrix elements of three terms @xmath129 , @xmath130 and @xmath131 is equal to ( see badnell @xcite ) : @xmath132{c } \left ( n_i\lambda _ in_j\lambda _ j\left\| h_{oo1}^{(kk0,000 ) } + h_{oo2}^{(kk0,000 ) } + h_{oo4}^{(kk0,000 ) } \right\| n_{i^{\prime } } \lambda _ { i^{\prime } } n_{j^{\prime } } \lambda _ { j^{\prime } } \right ) = \\ = \left\ { -2k\left ( k+1\right ) \left ( t^{k+1}\left ( n_il_in_jl_j , n_{i^{\prime } } l_{i^{\prime } } n_{j^{\prime } } l_{j^{\prime } } \right ) -t^{k-1}\left ( n_il_in_jl_j , n_{i^{\prime } } l_{i^{\prime } } n_{j^{\prime } } l_{j^{\prime } } \right ) \right ) \right . \\ + \left ( l_i\left ( l_i+1\right ) -k\left ( k+1\right ) -l_{i^{\prime } } \left ( l_{i^{\prime } } + 1\right ) \right ) \\ \times \left ( u^{k+1}\left ( n_il_in_jl_j , n_{i^{\prime } } l_{i^{\prime } } n_{j^{\prime } } l_{j^{\prime } } \right ) -u^{k-1}\left ( n_il_in_jl_j , n_{i^{\prime } } l_{i^{\prime } } n_{j^{\prime } } l_{j^{\prime } } \right ) \right ) \\ + \left ( l_j\left ( l_j+1\right ) -k\left ( k+1\right ) -l_{j^{\prime } } \left ( l_{j^{\prime } } + 1\right ) \right ) \\ \times \left ( u^{k+1}\left ( n_jl_jn_il_i , n_{j^{\prime } } l_{j^{\prime } } n_{i^{\prime } } l_{i^{\prime } } \right ) -u^{k-1}\left ( n_jl_jn_il_i , n_{j^{\prime } } l_{j^{\prime } } n_{i^{\prime } } l_{i^{\prime } } \right ) \right ) \\ + \frac 12\left ( l_i\left ( l_i+1\right ) -k\left ( k+1\right ) -l_{i^{\prime } } \left ( l_{i^{\prime } } + 1\right ) \right ) \left ( l_j\left ( l_j+1\right ) -k\left ( k+1\right ) -l_{j^{\prime } } \left ( l_{j^{\prime } } + 1\right ) \right ) \\ \times \left [ \frac{k-2}{k\left ( 2k-1\right ) } \left ( n^{k-2}\left ( n_il_in_jl_j , n_{i^{\prime } } l_{i^{\prime } } n_{j^{\prime } } l_{j^{\prime } } \right ) + n^{k-2}\left ( n_jl_jn_il_i , n_{j^{\prime } } l_{j^{\prime } } n_{i^{\prime } } l_{i^{\prime } } \right ) \right ) \right . \\ -\frac{k+3}{\left ( k+1\right ) \left ( 2k+3\right ) } \left ( n^k\left ( n_il_in_jl_j , n_{i^{\prime } } l_{i^{\prime } } n_{j^{\prime } } l_{j^{\prime } } \right ) + n^k\left ( n_jl_jn_il_i , n_{j^{\prime } } l_{j^{\prime } } n_{i^{\prime } } l_{i^{\prime } } \right ) \right ) \right ] \right\ } \\ \times \left ( 1-\delta \left ( k,0\right ) \right ) , \end{array}\ ] ] where @xmath133{c } t^k\left ( n_il_in_jl_j , n_{i^{\prime } } l_{i^{\prime } } n_{j^{\prime } } l_{j^{\prime } } \right ) = \frac{\alpha ^2}{4\left ( 2k+1\right ) } \\ \times \int_0^\infty \int_0^\infty p_i\left ( r_1\right ) p_j\left ( r_2\right ) \frac{r_<^k}{r_>^{k+1 } } \left(\frac{\partial}{\partial r_1}+\frac{1}{r_1}\right ) p_{i^{\prime } } \left ( r_1\right ) \left(\frac{\partial}{\partial r_2}+\frac{1}{r_2}\right ) p_{j^{\prime } } \left ( r_2\right ) dr_1dr_{2 } , \end{array}\ ] ] @xmath134{c } u^k\left ( n_il_in_jl_j , n_{i^{\prime } } l_{i^{\prime } } n_{j^{\prime } } l_{j^{\prime } } \right ) = \frac{\alpha ^2}{4\left ( 2k+1\right ) } \\ \times \int_0^\infty \int_0^\infty p_i\left ( r_1\right ) p_j\left ( r_2\right)\left ( ( k-1)\frac{r_2^k}{r_1^{k+2}}\epsilon ( r_1-r_2 ) -(k+2)\frac{r_1^{k-1}}{r_2^{k+1}}\epsilon ( r_2-r_1)\right ) \\ \times p_{i^{\prime } } \left ( r_1\right ) \left(\frac{\partial}{\partial r_2}+\frac{1}{r_2}\right ) p_{j^{\prime } } \left ( r_2\right ) dr_1dr_{2}. \end{array}\ ] ] the submatrix element of remaining term @xmath135 is : @xmath136{c } \left ( n_i\lambda _ in_j\lambda _ j\left\|h_{oo3}^{(kk0,000 ) } \right\| n_{i^{\prime } } \lambda _ { i^{\prime } } n_{j^{\prime } } \lambda _ { j^{\prime } } \right ) = 2 \sqrt{2k+1}\frac 1{k(k+1 ) } \\ \times \left ( \left ( l_i+l_{i^{\prime } } + k+2\right ) \left ( l_i+l_{i^{\prime } } -k\right ) \left ( l_i - l_{i^{\prime } } + k+1\right ) \left ( l_{i^{\prime } } -l_i+k+1\right ) \right . \\ \times \left . \left ( l_j+l_{j^{\prime } } + k+2\right ) \times \left ( l_j+l_{j^{\prime } } -k\right ) \left ( l_j - l_{j^{\prime } } + k+1\right ) \left ( l_{j^{\prime } } -l_j+k+1\right ) \right ) ^{1/2 } \\ \times \left ( l_i||c^{\left ( k+1\right ) } ||l_{i^{\prime } } \right ) \left ( l_j||c^{\left ( k+1\right ) } ||l_{j^{\prime } } \right ) \\ \times \left ( n^{k-1}\left ( n_il_in_jl_j , n_{i^{\prime } } l_{i^{\prime } } n_{j^{\prime } } l_{j^{\prime } } \right ) + n^{k-1}\left ( n_jl_jn_il_i , n_{j^{\prime } } l_{j^{\prime } } n_{i^{\prime } } l_{i^{\prime } } \right ) \right ) . \end{array}\ ] ] the rest of two - particle breit - pauli operators that we did not investigate so far are the two - body darwin and spin - spin - contact terms . they do not bring any additional difficulties into the investigation of hamiltonian , but for the sake of completeness of presentation we will discuss them briefly the _ two - body darwin _ operator @xmath15 ( see for more detail nikitin and rudzikas @xcite ) , as well as the _ spin - spin - contact _ operator @xmath16 ( see shalit and talmi @xcite and feneuille @xcite ) , both have the following tensorial structure : @xmath137{c } h \equiv \displaystyle { \sum_{k } } h^{(kk0,000)}. \end{array}\ ] ] these two terms are included into calculation by adding to the radial integral @xmath138 a term @xmath139 where @xmath140{c } x\left ( n_il_in_jl_j , n_{i^{\prime } } l_{i^{\prime } } n_{j^{\prime } } l_{j^{\prime } } \right ) \\ = \frac{\alpha ^2}4\int_0^\infty \int_0^\infty p_i\left ( r_1\right ) p_j\left ( r_2\right ) \frac{1}{r_1^{2 } } \delta \left ( r_1-r_2 \right ) p_{i^{\prime } } \left ( r_1\right ) p_{j^{\prime } } \left ( r_2\right ) dr_1dr_{2}. \end{array}\ ] ] the expression ( [ eq : op - i ] ) has a series of terms , and thus at a first glance seems to be difficult to apply . for this purpose in the next sections we shall discuss in more detail : * obtaining the expression by wick s theorem . * the compact written form of all terms , using the extended graphical technique . * obtaining the values of recoupling matrix and of the standard quantities . we shall also compare the existing methodologies of finding angular parts , showing the advantages and shortcomings of one methodology or another . this methodology is fully applicable also for the one - particle operator ( see gaigalas and rudzikas @xcite , gaigalas _ et al _ as this operator does not cause big problems in the atomic physics , we will not stop for its details . wick s theorem in the second quantization formalism is formulated as follows ( see wick @xcite ; bogoliubov and shirkov @xcite ) : if @xmath141 is a product of creation and annihilation operators , then @xmath142 where @xmath143 represents the normal form of @xmath141 and @xmath144 represents the sum of the normal - ordered terms obtained by making all possible single , double , ... contractions within @xmath141 . based on the identification in bogoliubov and shirkov @xcite , the operator is presented in normal form when all of the operators of annihilation included in it are transferred to the right of the creation operators . usually , wick s theorem is applied when treating complex operators that are represented by a large number of second quantization operators in a non - normal product form . in atomic physics such operators are used in perturbation theory ( see fetter and waleka @xcite ; lindgren and morrison @xcite ; merkelis _ et al _ @xcite ) and in the orthogonal operator method ( see uylings @xcite ) . most often the wick s theorem is applied to the products of second quantization operators that are not tensorially coupled ( see lindgren and morrison @xcite ) . while applying the perturbation theory in an extended model space , two different groups of second quantization operators are defined ( see for details in lindgren and morrison @xcite ) . the second quantization operators acting upon core states belong to one group , whereas the operators acting upon open and excited shells belong to another one . these two groups are very different in applying wick s theorem to them . in the first group , the creation operators are re - named to annihilation operators and are called the hole absorption operators , while the annihilation operators are re - named to creation operators and are called the hole creation operators . the creation operators of the second group are called the particle creation operators , while annihilation ones are called the particle absorption operators . such a division of second quantization operators into two groups is called the particle - hole formalism . merkelis _ et al _ @xcite have proposed to use the so - called graphical analogue of wick s theorem in perturbation theory ( see gaigalas _ et al _ @xcite , gaigalas @xcite ) . it is an efficient tool for obtaining the normal products of second quantization operators in a coupled tensorial form . before applying this theorem , particular second quantization terms are in a normal product in coupled form . in addition , this theorem is applied in the particle - hole formalism , too ( see merkelis _ @xcite , merkelis _ et al _ @xcite ) . in all the cases mentioned above , the wick s theorem is applied for the most general case of operators , i.e. the shells that are acted upon are not detailed . but , in the case of the extended model space , the group that the second quantization operators belong to , depending on the electronic structure of atom or ion under investigation , is defined . wick s theorem is not applied in investigations of ordinary physical operators . @xcite proposed a new version of the wick s theorem application , where the optimal tensorial expression of any two - particle operator is easily obtained . the specificity of wick s theorem application in this case lies in applying it only when the shells that are acted upon by the secondary quantization operators are known , i.e. it is applied for each term @xmath145 separately . such an interpretation of wick s theorem bears similarity with the particle - hole formalism . the only difference is that in this case the second quantization operators are differentiated formally not on the basis of structure of atom under investigation , but on the basis of shells acted upon . this is done in the following way . the second quantization operators acting upon a shell with a lowest index are attributed to the first group . those acting upon a shell with a next - lowest index are attributed to the second group , etc . in the most general case we have four distinct groups . for example , suppose we have a two - particle operator @xmath146 , @xmath147 ( where @xmath148 , @xmath149 , @xmath150 ) , the matrix element of which between the functions @xmath151 and @xmath152 we must obtain . then the operators acting upon the second shell are attributed to the first group , the ones acting upon the third shell - to the second , and the ones acting upon the fifth - to the third group . assuming that all the operators from first group are the creation ones , and the rest are annihilation operators , we apply the wick s theorem . thus we obtain that the operators from the first group are one beside another , and all are positioned after the operators from the first group . thus we obtain : @xmath153 after that , we apply wick s theorem assuming that the operators from the first and the second groups are creation ones , and the rest of them are annihilation operators . thus we obtain that the operators from the second group are one beside another , and all are positioned after the first group operators : @xmath154 if in the product that we investigate there are operators of second quantization acting upon four distinct shells , then we apply wick s theorem once again , assuming that operators from the first , second and third groups are creation ones , and from the fourth group - annihilation ones . in this case the wick s theorem is applied to the second quantization operators in uncoupled form . from ( [ eq : op - b ] ) we see that in second quantization a two - particle operator is written as a sum , where parameters @xmath44 , @xmath155 , @xmath156 , @xmath157 run over all possible arrays of quantum numbers . so , the greater the number of open shells in bra and ket functions , the greater the number of terms @xmath145 in the expression of two - particle operator . it is obvious that all these terms must be systematized in order to obtain in general case the most efficient tensorial expression of a two - particle operator , in the way described above . .distributions of shells , upon which the second quantization operators are acting , that appear in the submatrix elements of any two - particle operator , when bra and ket functions have @xmath22 open shells ( see gaigalas _ @xcite ) [ cols=">,^,^,^,^,^ " , ] in the work by gaigalas _ et al _ @xcite it is chosen an optimal number of distributions , which is necessary to obtain the matrix elements of any two - particle operator , when the bra and ket functions consist of arbitrary number of shells . this is presented in table 1 . we point out that for distributions 2 - 5 and 19 - 42 the shells sequence numbers @xmath158 , @xmath159 , @xmath160 , @xmath161 ( in bra and ket functions of a submatrix element ) satisfy the condition @xmath162 , while for distributions 6 - 18 no conditions upon @xmath158 , @xmath159 , @xmath160 , @xmath161 are imposed ( this permits to reduce the number of distributions ) . for distributions 19 - 42 this condition is imposed only for obtaining simple analytical expressions for the recoupling matrices @xmath163 . this will be discussed in more detail in the next section . so , in the way that is described earlier , the wick s theorem is applied , assuming that the second quantization operators acting upon shells @xmath164 , @xmath165 , @xmath160 and @xmath161 belong to different groups . in the next section we discuss the way to obtain irreducible tensorial form of these distributions . in addition , the arguments will be given in evidence of superiority of the obtained tensorial expressions against other expressions known in the literature . the methodology presented in this section demonstrates the way to obtain optimal arrangement of the second quantization operators , for any two - particle operator . it can be applied without restrictions for obtaining the optimal tensorial form of two - particle terms of orthogonal operators and of perturbation theory operators , too . the graphical technique of angular momentum is widely used in the atomic physics : see yutsis _ @xcite , jucys and bandzaitis @xcite , brink and satcher @xcite , el - baz @xcite . it is applied efficiently both in the coordinate representation ( see for example jucys and bandzaitis @xcite ) , and in the second quantization formalism ( gaigalas _ et al _ the use of it allows one to obtain the analytical expressions for the recoupling matrices conveniently ( see for example kaniauskas and rudzikas @xcite ) , to investigate the tensorial products of operators ( see for example jucys _ @xcite ) , and to seek for the matrix elements of operators ( see for example huang and starace @xcite ) . gaigalas and merkelis @xcite have proposed a graphical way to obtain the values of matrix elements when the operator is a many - particle ( one- , two- , three- , etc . ) one and has irreducible tensorial form . for example , when a two - particle operator is considered , it has the form ( [ eq : op - c ] ) or ( [ eq : op - e ] ) . the matrix elements in this methodology are expressed not only in the terms of coefficients of fractional parentage or reduced coefficients of fractional parentage , but in terms of standard quantities @xmath166 and @xmath167 , too . @xcite have proposed to calculate the matrix elements by using the tensorial expressions for such two - particle operator , that take full advantage of racah algebra . in this case the tensorial form of operator depends on the shells that the operator acts upon ( distributions 1 - 42 from table 1 ) . this is the difference of this methodology from other . it is most convenient to obtain the tensorial expressions for 42 distributions graphically , using the generalized graphical technique by gaigalas _ et al _ @xcite . in such a case not only the similarities between different distributions are easily seen , but also the compact graphical representation of the obtained expressions is possible . we will stop for details on this in the present section . a two - particle operator may be represented graphically by a feynman - goldstone diagram @xmath168 from figure [ fig : dd - a ] ( lindgren and morrison @xcite ) . as it is shown in the paper bolotin _ @xcite , the feynman - goldstone diagrams are topologically equivalent to the angular momentum graphs . due to that , an irreducible tensorial form for every feynman - goldstone diagram may be obtained ( see merkelis _ the graph @xmath169 is the angular momentum graph corresponding to the diagram @xmath168 . so the two - particle operator will be written down as follows : @xmath170{c } \widehat{g } ( ij , i^{\prime } j^{\prime } ) = d_{1}= - \frac 12 \displaystyle { \sum_{m_{\lambda _ i}m_{\lambda _ j } m_{\lambda ^{\prime } _ i}m_{\lambda ^{\prime } _ j } } } \displaystyle { \sum_p } \left [ \kappa _ { 1},\kappa _ { 2},\sigma _ { 1},\sigma _ { 2}\right ] ^{-1/2 } \times \\ \times \left ( n_i\lambda _ in_j\lambda _ j||g^{\left ( \kappa _ 1\kappa _ 2k,\sigma _ 1\sigma _ 2k\right ) } ||n_i^{\prime } \lambda _ i^{\prime } n_j^{\prime } \lambda _ j^{\prime } \right ) ~d_{2}~~ a^{\left ( \lambda _ i\right ) } _ { m_{\lambda _ i } } a^{\left ( \lambda _ j\right ) } _ { m_{\lambda _ j } } \stackrel{\sim } { a}^{\left ( \lambda _ i^{\prime } \right ) } _ { m_{\lambda ^{\prime } _ i } } \stackrel{\sim } { a}^{\left ( \lambda _ j^{\prime } \right ) } _ { m_{\lambda ^{\prime } _ j } } , \end{array}\ ] ] ( 148,180 ) ( 10,140)(0,1)10 ( 10,150)(0,1)2 ( 5,148)(0,0)[t]@xmath171 ( 20,140)(0,1)10 ( 20,150)(0,1)2 ( 25,148)(0,0)[t]@xmath172 ( 11,140)(2,0)5(2,1)[t ] ( 15,143)(0,0)@xmath173 ( 10,130)(0,1)10 ( 10,130)(0,1)3 ( 5,133)(0,0)@xmath174 ( 10,128)(0,1)3 ( 20,130)(0,1)10 ( 20,130)(0,1)3 ( 25,133)(0,0)@xmath175 ( 20,128)(0,1)3 ( 15,120)(0,0)@xmath176 ( 45,140)(0,1)12 ( 45,140 ) ( 40,148)(0,0)[t]@xmath177 ( 75,140)(0,12)12 ( 75,152)(0,-1)3 ( 75,140 ) ( 81,148)(0,0)[t]@xmath178 ( 45,140.6)(6,0)6 ( 45,140.3)(6,0)6 ( 45,140)(20,0)30 ( 45,139.7)(6,0)6 ( 45,139.4)(6,0)6 ( 52,143)(0,0)@xmath179 ( 69,140.6)(6,0)6 ( 69,140.3)(6,0)6 ( 69,139.7)(6,0)6 ( 69,139.4)(6,0)6 ( 68,143)(0,0)@xmath180 ( 60,140 ) ( 60,145)(0,0)@xmath181 ( 60.6,135)(0,1)5 ( 60.3,135)(0,1)5 ( 60,135)(0,1)5 ( 59.7,135)(0,1)5 ( 59.4,135)(0,1)5 ( 60,132)(0,0)@xmath182 ( 45,130)(0,1)10 ( 39,134)(0,0)@xmath183 ( 40,140)(0,0)@xmath184 ( 45,130)(0,-1)3 ( 75,130)(0,1)10 ( 81,134)(0,0)@xmath185 ( 80,140)(0,0)@xmath181 ( 75,127)(0,1)3 ( 60,120)(0,0)@xmath186 ( 100,136)(0,1)12 ( 100,147)(5,5)[b ] ( 94,144)(0,0)[t]@xmath171 ( 100,120)(0,0)@xmath187 ( 120,126)(0,1)10 ( 114,130)(0,0)@xmath172 ( 120,123)(0,1)3 ( 120,125)(5,5)[t ] ( 120,120)(0,0)@xmath188 ( 10,90)(0,1)10 ( 10,100)(0,1)2 ( 5,98)(0,0)[t]@xmath171 ( 20,90)(0,1)10 ( 20,100)(0,1)2 ( 25,98)(0,0)[t]@xmath172 ( 10,90)(1,0)10 ( 15,93)(0,0)@xmath173 ( 10,80)(0,1)10 ( 10,80)(0,1)3 ( 5,83)(0,0)@xmath174 ( 10,78)(0,1)3 ( 20,80)(0,1)10 ( 20,80)(0,1)3 ( 25,83)(0,0)@xmath175 ( 20,78)(0,1)3 ( 15,70)(0,0)@xmath189 ( 80,90)(0,1)12 ( 80,101)(5,5)[b ] ( 80,90 ) ( 75,98)(0,0)[t]@xmath171 ( 110,90)(0,12)12 ( 110,102)(0,-1)3 ( 110,101)(5,5)[b ] ( 110,90 ) ( 115,98)(0,0)[t]@xmath174 ( 80,90.6)(6,0)6 ( 80,90.3)(6,0)6 ( 80,90)(20,0)30 ( 80,89.7)(6,0)6 ( 80,89.4)(6,0)6 ( 87,93)(0,0)@xmath190 ( 104,90.6)(6,0)6 ( 104,90.3)(6,0)6 ( 104,89.7)(6,0)6 ( 104,89.4)(6,0)6 ( 103,93)(0,0)@xmath191 ( 95,90 ) ( 95,95)(0,0)@xmath181 ( 95.6,85)(0,1)5 ( 95.3,85)(0,1)5 ( 95,85)(0,1)5 ( 94.7,85)(0,1)5 ( 94.4,85)(0,1)5 ( 95,82)(0,0)@xmath182 ( 80,80)(0,1)10 ( 74,84)(0,0)@xmath172 ( 75,90)(0,0)@xmath184 ( 80,80)(0,-1)3 ( 80,79)(5,5)[t ] ( 110,80)(0,1)10 ( 116,84)(0,0)@xmath175 ( 115,90)(0,0)@xmath181 ( 110,77)(0,1)3 ( 110,79)(5,5)[t ] ( 95,70)(0,0)@xmath192 ( 10,40)(0,1)10 ( 10,50)(0,1)2 ( 5,48)(0,0)[t]@xmath171 ( 10,40)(1,0)10 ( 15,37)(0,0)@xmath173 ( 16,48)(0,0)@xmath193 ( 16,45)(-1,0)2 ( 20,30)(0,1)10 ( 15,40)(10,10)[t ] ( 20,30)(0,1)3 ( 26,33)(0,0)@xmath175 ( 20,28)(0,1)3 ( 15,20)(0,0)@xmath194 ( 45,40)(0,1)12 ( 45,51)(5,5)[b ] ( 45,40 ) ( 40,48)(0,0)[t]@xmath171 ( 75,40)(0,1)12 ( 75,51)(5,5)[b ] ( 75,40 ) ( 80,48)(0,0)[t]@xmath172 ( 45,40.6)(6,0)6 ( 45,40.3)(6,0)6 ( 45,40)(20,0)30 ( 45,39.7)(6,0)6 ( 45,39.4)(6,0)6 ( 52,43)(0,0)@xmath179 ( 69,40.6)(6,0)6 ( 69,40.3)(6,0)6 ( 69,39.7)(6,0)6 ( 69,39.4)(6,0)6 ( 68,43)(0,0)@xmath195 ( 60,40 ) ( 60,45)(0,0)@xmath181 ( 60.6,35)(0,1)5 ( 60.3,35)(0,1)5 ( 60,35)(0,1)5 ( 59.7,35)(0,1)5 ( 59.4,35)(0,1)5 ( 60,32)(0,0)@xmath182 ( 45,30)(0,1)10 ( 39,34)(0,0)@xmath174 ( 40,40)(0,0)@xmath184 ( 45,27)(0,1)3 ( 45,29)(5,5)[t ] ( 75,30)(0,1)10 ( 81,34)(0,0)@xmath175 ( 80,40)(0,0)@xmath181 ( 75,27)(0,1)3 ( 75,29)(5,5)[t ] ( 60,20)(0,0)@xmath196 ( 110,42 ) ( 110,37)(0,0)@xmath184 ( 110.6,42)(0,1)5 ( 110.3,42)(0,1)5 ( 110,42)(0,1)5 ( 109.7,42)(0,1)5 ( 109.4,42)(0,1)5 ( 115,45)(0,0)@xmath182 ( 100,32)(1,1)10 ( 100,27)(0,1)5 ( 94,34)(0,0)@xmath171 ( 100,30)(0,-1)3 ( 100,29)(5,5)[t ] ( 120,32)(-1,1)10 ( 120,27)(0,1)5 ( 126,34)(0,0)@xmath175 ( 120,27)(0,1)3 ( 120,29)(5,5)[t ] ( 110,20)(0,0)@xmath197 it must be noted that in expression ( [ eq : pas - a ] ) the projection @xmath198 of @xmath199 , as well as that of the momentum line @xmath200 in graph @xmath169 are the same . this is also to be said about the remaining operators of second quantization and the three open lines af graph @xmath169 . as it has been mentiond in section 2 , this operator has two tensorial forms , ( [ eq : op - c ] ) and ( [ eq : op - d ] ) . these may be represented graphically , since the creation operator @xmath201 , as well as operator @xmath202 respectivelly , are graphically denoted by diagrams @xmath203 and @xmath204 . the first form ( [ eq : op - c ] ) of two - particle operator @xmath205 is represented as : @xmath206{c } g_i(ij , i^{\prime } j^{\prime } ) = d_1=-\frac 12 \displaystyle { \sum_{\kappa _ { 12}\kappa _ { 12}^{^{\prime } } \sigma _ { 12}\sigma _ { 12}^{^{\prime } } } } \displaystyle { \sum_p}\left ( -1\right ) ^{k - p}\left [ \kappa _ 1,\kappa _ 2,\sigma _ 1,\sigma _ 2\right ] ^{1/2}\times \\ \times \left ( n_i\lambda _ in_j\lambda _ j||g^{\left ( \kappa _ 1\kappa _ 2k,\sigma _ 1\sigma _ 2k\right ) } ||n_i^{\prime } \lambda _ i^{\prime } n_j^{\prime } \lambda _ j^{\prime } \right ) \left\ { \begin{array}{ccc } l_i^{\prime } & l_j^{\prime } & \kappa _ { 12}^{\prime } \\ \kappa _ 1 & \kappa _ 2 & k \\ l_i & l_j & \kappa _ { 12 } \end{array } \right\ } \times \\ \times \left\ { \begin{array}{ccc } s & s & \sigma _ { 12}^{\prime } \\ \sigma _ 1 & \sigma _ 2 & k \\ s & s & \sigma _ { 12 } \end{array } \right\ } d_6 \end{array}\ ] ] whereas the second ( [ eq : op - d ] ) : @xmath207{c } g_{ii}(ij , i^{\prime } j^{\prime } ) = d_5+d_7= \\ = \frac 12 \displaystyle { \sum_p}\left ( -1\right ) ^{k - p}\left ( n_i\lambda _ in_j\lambda _ j||g^{\left ( \kappa _ 1\kappa _ 2k,\sigma _ 1\sigma _ 2k\right ) } ||n_i^{\prime } \lambda _ i^{\prime } n_j^{\prime } \lambda _ j^{\prime } \right ) \times \\ \times \{\left [ \kappa _ 1,\kappa _ 2,\sigma _ 1,\sigma _ 2\right ] ^{-1/2}d_8-\left ( -1\right ) ^{l_i+l_j^{\prime } } \left\ { \begin{array}{ccc } \kappa _ 1 & \kappa _ 2 & k \\ l_j^{\prime } & l_i & l_j \end{array } \right\ } \times \\ \times \left\ { \begin{array}{ccc } \sigma _ 1 & \sigma _ 2 & k \\ s & s & s \end{array } \right\ } \delta \left ( n_jl_j , n_i^{\prime } l_i^{\prime } \right ) d_9\}. \end{array}\ ] ] we emphasize here that the winding line of interaction in the feynman - goldstone diagram corresponds to the operators of second quantization in the normal order ( figure [ fig : dd - a ] , @xmath208 ) . whereas the dotted interaction line indicates that the second quantization operators are ordered in pairs of creation - annihilation operators . in the latter case first comes the pair on the left side of a feynman - goldstone diagram ( figure [ fig : dd - a ] , @xmath209 ) . such a notation of two kinds for an interaction line is meaningful only for two - particle ( or more ) operators , since for any one - particle operator both the winding and dotted lines correspond to the same order of creation and annihilation operators . from expressions ( [ eq : pas - b ] ) , ( [ eq : pas - c ] ) we see that the two - particle operator in the first form is represented by one feynman - goldstone diagram @xmath208 , whereas in the second - by two diagrams @xmath209 and @xmath210 . the diagrams , corresponding to tensorial product , have the following algebraic expressions : @xmath211 ^{\left ( \kappa _ { 12}\sigma _ { 12}\right ) } \times \left [ \stackrel{\sim } { a}^{\left ( \lambda _ i^{\prime } \right ) } \times \stackrel{\sim } { a}^{\left ( \lambda _ j^{\prime } \right ) } \right ] ^{\left ( \kappa _ { 12}^{\prime } \sigma _ { 12}^{\prime } \right ) } \right ] _ { p - p}^{\left ( kk\right ) } , \ ] ] @xmath212 ^{\left ( \kappa _ 1\sigma _ 1\right ) } \times \left [ a^{\left ( \lambda _ j\right ) } \times \stackrel{\sim } { a}^{\left ( \lambda _ j^{\prime } \right ) } \right ] ^{\left ( \kappa _ 2\sigma _ 2\right ) } \right ] _ { p - p}^{\left ( kk\right ) } \ ] ] @xmath213 _ { p - p}^{\left ( kk\right ) } \ ] ] the positions of the second quantization operators in the diagrams @xmath214 , @xmath215 and @xmath216 define their order in tensorial products : the first place in tensorial product occupies the upper right second quantization operator , the second - lower right , after them the upper left and lower left operators follow . the angular momenta diagram defines their coupling scheme into tensorial product . for more detail see gaigalas and rudzikas @xcite . as it has been mentioned earlier , these two forms do not always take full advantage of the racah algebra ( see gaigalas and rudzikas @xcite ) . the expression ( [ eq : op - i ] ) has no such shortcomings . now we will demonstrate the way to obtain graphically a tensorial expressions for particular distributions 1 - 42 from table 1 . ( 148,120 ) ( 10,105)(0,1)10 ( 10,115)(0,1)2 ( 5,113)(0,0)[t]@xmath217 ( 20,105)(0,1)10 ( 20,115)(0,1)2 ( 25,113)(0,0)[t]@xmath218 ( 11,105)(2,0)5(2,1)[t ] ( 15,110)(0,0)@xmath173 ( 10,95)(0,1)10 ( 10,95)(0,1)3 ( 5,98)(0,0)@xmath219 ( 10,93)(0,1)3 ( 20,95)(0,1)10 ( 20,95)(0,1)3 ( 25,98)(0,0)@xmath217 ( 20,93)(0,1)3 ( 15,85)(0,0)@xmath220 ( 70,105)(0,1)12 ( 70,105 ) ( 65,113)(0,0)[t]@xmath221 ( 100,105)(0,12)12 ( 100,117)(0,-1)3 ( 100,105 ) ( 106,113)(0,0)[t]@xmath222 ( 70,105.6)(6,0)6 ( 70,105.3)(6,0)6 ( 70,105)(20,0)30 ( 70,104.7)(6,0)6 ( 70,104.4)(6,0)6 ( 77,108)(0,0)@xmath179 ( 94,105.6)(6,0)6 ( 94,105.3)(6,0)6 ( 94,104.7)(6,0)6 ( 69,104.4)(6,0)6 ( 93,108)(0,0)@xmath180 ( 85,105 ) ( 85,110)(0,0)@xmath181 ( 85.6,100)(0,1)5 ( 85.3,100)(0,1)5 ( 85,100)(0,1)5 ( 84.7,100)(0,1)5 ( 84.4,100)(0,1)5 ( 85,97)(0,0)@xmath182 ( 70,95)(0,1)10 ( 65,99)(0,0)@xmath223 ( 65,105)(0,0)@xmath184 ( 70,95)(0,-1)3 ( 100,95)(0,1)10 ( 106,99)(0,0)@xmath224 ( 105,105)(0,0)@xmath181 ( 100,92)(0,1)3 ( 85,85)(0,0)@xmath225 ( 10,50)(0,1)12 ( 10,61)(5,5)[b ] ( 10,50 ) ( 5,58)(0,0)[t]@xmath226 ( 40,50)(0,12)12 ( 40,62)(0,-1)3 ( 40,61)(5,5)[b ] ( 40,50 ) ( 46,58)(0,0)[t]@xmath227 ( 10,50.6)(6,0)6 ( 10,50.3)(6,0)6 ( 10,50)(20,0)30 ( 10,49.7)(6,0)6 ( 10,49.4)(6,0)6 ( 17,53)(0,0)@xmath190 ( 34,50.6)(6,0)6 ( 34,50.3)(6,0)6 ( 34,49.7)(6,0)6 ( 34,49.4)(6,0)6 ( 33,53)(0,0)@xmath191 ( 25,50 ) ( 25,55)(0,0)@xmath181 ( 25.6,45)(0,1)5 ( 25.3,45)(0,1)5 ( 25,45)(0,1)5 ( 24.7,45)(0,1)5 ( 24.4,45)(0,1)5 ( 25,42)(0,0)@xmath182 ( 10,40)(0,1)10 ( 4,44)(0,0)@xmath226 ( 5,50)(0,0)@xmath184 ( 10,40)(0,-1)3 ( 10,39)(5,5)[t ] ( 40,40)(0,1)10 ( 46,44)(0,0)@xmath228 ( 45,50)(0,0)@xmath181 ( 40,37)(0,1)3 ( 40,39)(5,5)[t ] ( 25,20)(0,0)@xmath229 ( 70,63 ) ( 100,63 ) ( 70,63)(1,-1)30 ( 100,63)(-1,-1)30 ( 70,63.6)(6,0)6 ( 70,63.3)(6,0)6 ( 70,63)(20,0)30 ( 70,62.7)(6,0)6 ( 70,62.4)(6,0)6 ( 77,66)(0,0)@xmath179 ( 94,63.6)(6,0)6 ( 94,63.3)(6,0)6 ( 94,62.7)(6,0)6 ( 94,62.4)(6,0)6 ( 93,66)(0,0)@xmath180 ( 85,63 ) ( 85,68)(0,0)@xmath184 ( 85.6,63)(0,-1)30 ( 85.3,63)(0,-1)30 ( 85,63)(0,-1)30 ( 84.7,63)(0,-1)30 ( 84.4,63)(0,-1)30 ( 81,59)(0,0)@xmath182 ( 77,55)(0,0)[t]@xmath230 ( 65,48)(0,0)[t]@xmath221 ( 70,68)(0,0)@xmath181 ( 70,63)(0,-1)30 ( 95,55)(0,0)[t]@xmath221 ( 106,48)(0,0)[t]@xmath222 ( 100,68)(0,0)@xmath181 ( 100,63)(0,-1)30 ( 85,33 ) ( 85,28)(0,0)@xmath184 ( 70,28)(0,0)@xmath181 ( 70,33 ) ( 70,33.6)(6,0)6 ( 70,33.3)(6,0)6 ( 70,33)(20,0)30 ( 70,32.7)(6,0)6 ( 70,32.4)(6,0)6 ( 77,30)(0,0)@xmath190 ( 100,28)(0,0)@xmath184 ( 100,33 ) ( 94,33.6)(6,0)6 ( 94,33.3)(6,0)6 ( 94,32.7)(6,0)6 ( 94,32.4)(6,0)6 ( 93,30)(0,0)@xmath191 ( 85,20)(0,0)@xmath231 we take the distribution @xmath160 , @xmath159 , @xmath158 , @xmath160 ( 13 form table 1 ) as an example for investigation . then the feynman - goldstone diagram of operator @xmath232 is @xmath233 , the angular momentum graph is @xmath234 , and the second quantization operators are in the following order : @xmath235 applying the wick s theorem as described in section 3 , and assuming that the operators acting upon shell @xmath160 belong to the first group , the once acting upon @xmath159 belong to the second , and the ones acting upon @xmath158 belong to the third group , we obtain the following order of operators : @xmath236 using the generalized graphical technique of angular momentum by gaigalas _ @xcite , we couple the operators of second quantization into tensorial product @xmath237 ( see figure [ fig : dd - c ] ) : @xmath238 ^{\left ( \kappa _ { 12}\sigma _ { 12}\right ) } \times \left [ \stackrel{\sim } { a}^{\left ( \lambda _ { \beta } \right ) } \times \stackrel{\sim } { a}^{\left ( \lambda _ { \alpha}\right ) } \right ] ^{\left ( \kappa _ { 12}^{\prime } \sigma _ { 12}^{\prime } \right ) } \right ] _ { p - p}^{\left ( kk\right ) } .\ ] ] in the course of obtaining @xmath237 graphically , a recoupling matrix @xmath239 appears , whose analytical expression is readily obtained by using the graphical technique of jucys and bandzaitis @xcite . all the needed expressions are obtained in the same way . ( 148,105 ) ( 20,90)(0,1)10 ( 20,100)(0,1)2 ( 15,98)(0,0)[t]@xmath240 ( 30,90)(0,1)10 ( 30,100)(0,1)2 ( 35,98)(0,0)[t]@xmath241 ( 20,90)(1,0)10 ( 25,93)(0,0)@xmath173 ( 20,80)(0,1)10 ( 20,80)(0,1)3 ( 15,83)(0,0)@xmath242 ( 20,78)(0,1)3 ( 30,80)(0,1)10 ( 30,80)(0,1)3 ( 35,83)(0,0)@xmath243 ( 30,78)(0,1)3 ( 25,70)(0,0)@xmath244 ( 80,90)(0,1)12 ( 80,101)(5,5)[b ] ( 80,90 ) ( 74,98)(0,0)[t]@xmath240 ( 110,90)(0,1)12 ( 110,101)(5,5)[b ] ( 110,90 ) ( 115,98)(0,0)[t]@xmath241 ( 80,90.6)(6,0)6 ( 80,90.3)(6,0)6 ( 80,90)(20,0)30 ( 80,89.7)(6,0)6 ( 80,89.4)(6,0)6 ( 87,93)(0,0)@xmath179 ( 104,90.6)(6,0)6 ( 104,90.3)(6,0)6 ( 104,89.7)(6,0)6 ( 104,89.4)(6,0)6 ( 103,93)(0,0)@xmath195 ( 95,90 ) ( 95,95)(0,0)@xmath181 ( 95.6,85)(0,1)5 ( 95.3,85)(0,1)5 ( 95,85)(0,1)5 ( 94.7,85)(0,1)5 ( 94.4,85)(0,1)5 ( 95,82)(0,0)@xmath182 ( 80,80)(0,1)10 ( 74,84)(0,0)@xmath242 ( 75,90)(0,0)@xmath184 ( 80,77)(0,1)3 ( 80,79)(5,5)[t ] ( 110,80)(0,1)10 ( 116,84)(0,0)@xmath243 ( 115,90)(0,0)@xmath181 ( 110,77)(0,1)3 ( 110,79)(5,5)[t ] ( 95,70)(0,0)@xmath245 ( 10,40)(0,1)12 ( 10,51)(5,5)[b ] ( 10,40 ) ( 4,48)(0,0)[t]@xmath241 ( 40,40)(0,1)12 ( 40,51)(5,5)[b ] ( 40,40 ) ( 45,48)(0,0)[t]@xmath240 ( 10,40.6)(6,0)6 ( 10,40.3)(6,0)6 ( 10,40)(20,0)30 ( 10,39.7)(6,0)6 ( 10,39.4)(6,0)6 ( 17,43)(0,0)@xmath179 ( 34,40.6)(6,0)6 ( 34,40.3)(6,0)6 ( 34,39.7)(6,0)6 ( 34,39.4)(6,0)6 ( 33,43)(0,0)@xmath195 ( 25,40 ) ( 25,45)(0,0)@xmath184 ( 28,37)(0,0)@xmath246 ( 25.6,35)(0,1)5 ( 25.3,35)(0,1)5 ( 25,35)(0,1)5 ( 24.7,35)(0,1)5 ( 24.4,35)(0,1)5 ( 25,32)(0,0)@xmath182 ( 10,30)(0,1)10 ( 4,34)(0,0)@xmath243 ( 5,40)(0,0)@xmath184 ( 10,27)(0,1)3 ( 10,29)(5,5)[t ] ( 40,30)(0,1)10 ( 46,34)(0,0)@xmath242 ( 45,40)(0,0)@xmath181 ( 40,27)(0,1)3 ( 40,29)(5,5)[t ] ( 25,20)(0,0)@xmath247 ( 80,40)(0,1)12 ( 80,51)(5,5)[b ] ( 80,40 ) ( 74,48)(0,0)[t]@xmath241 ( 110,40)(0,1)12 ( 110,51)(5,5)[b ] ( 110,40 ) ( 115,48)(0,0)[t]@xmath240 ( 80,40.6)(6,0)6 ( 80,40.3)(6,0)6 ( 80,40)(20,0)30 ( 80,39.7)(6,0)6 ( 80,39.4)(6,0)6 ( 87,43)(0,0)@xmath179 ( 104,40.6)(6,0)6 ( 104,40.3)(6,0)6 ( 104,39.7)(6,0)6 ( 104,39.4)(6,0)6 ( 103,43)(0,0)@xmath195 ( 95,40 ) ( 95,45)(0,0)@xmath181 ( 98,37)(0,0)@xmath246 ( 95.6,35)(0,1)5 ( 95.3,35)(0,1)5 ( 95,35)(0,1)5 ( 94.7,35)(0,1)5 ( 94.4,35)(0,1)5 ( 95,32)(0,0)@xmath182 ( 80,30)(0,1)10 ( 74,34)(0,0)@xmath243 ( 75,40)(0,0)@xmath184 ( 80,27)(0,1)3 ( 80,29)(5,5)[t ] ( 110,30)(0,1)10 ( 116,34)(0,0)@xmath242 ( 115,40)(0,0)@xmath181 ( 110,27)(0,1)3 ( 110,29)(5,5)[t ] ( 95,20)(0,0)@xmath248 in obtaining these expressions , as well as in representing them graphically , it is very convenient to use the rule of changing the sign of a node , existing in the graphical technique of angular momentum ( see jucys and bandzaitis @xcite ) . therefore now we will treat an example of using such a rule . suppose , we have the following correspondence between diagrams ( figure [ fig : dd - c ] ) : @xmath249 in which the second quantization operators are in the order @xmath250 @xmath251 @xmath252 @xmath253 . our goal is to obtain the diagram corresponding to the order @xmath254 @xmath253 @xmath255 @xmath251 . bearing in mind that the second quantization operators anticommute with each other and they all act on different electronic shells and we are not changing the order of their coupling into tensorial product , we arrive at @xmath256 let us also discuss another situation : we have defined the disposition of the operators and we want to couple them into certain tensorial product . suppose that we want to represent graphically the following tensorial product : @xmath257 ^{\left ( \kappa _ 1\sigma _ 1\right ) } \times \left [ a^{(\lambda _ 3)}\times \tilde a^{(\lambda _ 4)}\right ] ^{\left ( \kappa _ 2\sigma _ 2\right ) } \right ] ^{\left ( \kappa \sigma \right ) } .\ ] ] for this purpose we have to rearrange the generalized clebsch - gordan coefficient , which is defining the scheme of coupling of the operators into the tensorial product . it is easy to notice that this coefficient will properly define the tensorial product , if we change the sign of the vertex @xmath258 in diagram @xmath259 : @xmath260 the procedures described are fairly simple , however , they are sufficient for the majority of cases . the more complete description of this generalized graphical approach may be found in gaigalas _ @xcite , gaigalas @xcite , gaigalas and merkelis @xcite . all the analytical expressions for distributions 1 - 42 from table 1 are presented in the paper gaigalas _ et al _ they are written down using the generalized graphical methodology of angular momentum , and the vortex sign change rule , which was discussed in this section . as a consequence of that , the analytical expressions for 42 terms may be written down via 6 different expressions . this , undoubtedly , facilitates a lot the implementation of methodology proposed in gaigalas _ et al _ @xcite . in this section we will discuss several ways to obtain matrix elements of a two - particle operator . as it was mentioned earlier , up to now the fano calculation scheme @xcite is the most popular one . its general expression when a two - particle operator acts upon different shells is presented in ( [ eq : ma - c ] ) . the general expression for a matrix element in other cases is similar . for example , when the operator acts only upon one shell , we have @xmath261{c } ( \psi _ u^{bra}\left ( ls\right ) || \widehat{g}^{\left ( \kappa _ 1\kappa _ 2k,\sigma_1\sigma _ 2k\right ) } \sim \displaystyle { \sum_{n_{i } \lambda _ { i } } } \left ( -1\right ) ^\delta n_{i } \left ( n_{i}-1 \right ) \times \\ \times \displaystyle { \sum _ { \ { t \ } } } \left ( l_{i}^{n_{i}}\;\alpha_{i } l_{i}s_{i}||l_{i}^{n_{i}-1}\;\left ( \alpha_{i}^{\prime \prime } l^{\prime \prime}_{i } s^{\prime \prime}_{i } \right ) , l_{i } \right ) \left ( l_{i}^{n_{i}-1}\;\alpha_{i}^{\prime \prime } l_{i}^{\prime \prime}s_{i}^{\prime \prime } \alpha_{i}^{\prime \prime \prime } l_{i}^{\prime \prime \prime } s^{\prime \prime \prime}_{i } \right ) , l_{i } \right ) \times \\ \times \left ( l_{i}^{n_{i}^{\prime } } \ ; \alpha_{i}^{\prime \prime \prime } l_{i}^{\prime \prime \prime}s_{i}^{\prime \prime \prime } \alpha_{i}^{\prime v } l^{\prime v}_{i } s^{\prime v}_{i } \right ) , l_{i } \right ) \left ( l_{i}^{n_{i}^{\prime } -1}\;\alpha_{i}^{\prime v } l_{i}^{\prime v}s_{i}^{\prime v}||l_{i}^{n_{i}^{\prime } -2}\;\left ( \alpha_{i}^{\prime } l^{\prime}_{i } s^{\prime } _ { i } \right ) , l_{i } \right ) \times \\ \times r_{d } \left ( \lambda _ i,\lambda _ i,\lambda _ i,\lambda _ i , \kappa_1 , \kappa_2 , \kappa , \sigma_1 , \sigma_2 , \sigma , \lambda ^{bra } , \lambda ^{ket } \right ) \times \\ \times \left ( n_i\lambda _ in_i\lambda _ i|| g^{\left ( \kappa _ 1\kappa _ 2k,\sigma_1\sigma _ 2k\right ) } \end{array}\ ] ] as we see here , in contrast to ( [ eq : ma - c ] ) , the summation is performed only over one array @xmath38 , @xmath39 of quantum numbers , because the operator acts only upon one shell . but here a summation over @xmath262 occurs , though , which indicates the summation over arrays of intermediate terms @xmath263 , @xmath264 , @xmath265 . remembering the relationship between a coefficient of fractional parentage and a reduced matrix element of a second quantization operator ( see pakauskas _ et al _ @xcite , rudzikas and kaniauskas @xcite ) : @xmath266{c } \left ( l^{n}\;\alpha ls||a^{(ls)}|| l^{n-1}\ ; \alpha^{\prime } l^{\prime } s^{\prime } \right ) = \\ = ( -1)^{n+(n+1)\varphi ( n ) } \sqrt{n[l , s ] } \left ( l^{n}\;\alpha ls||l^{n-1}\;\left ( \alpha^{\prime } l^{\prime } s^{\prime } \right ) , l \right ) \end{array}\ ] ] we see that the racah algebra in expressions ( [ eq : ma - c ] ) , ( [ eq : ma - d ] ) is used only on the level of coefficients of fractional parentage . in separate cases , e.g. when the two - particle operator acts upon one or two shells , it is possible to use expressions which exploit the racah algebra at a higher level , i.e. to take more advantage of the tensor algebra elements ( see judd @xcite , jucys and savukynas @xcite ) . for example , let us investigate the case when a matrix element is calculated for bra and ket functions having one shell only . the tensorial forms ( [ eq : op - c ] ) and ( [ eq : op - e ] ) are of value here . taking the second one of these , we have @xmath267{c } ( nl^{n}\alpha ls|\widehat{g}_{ii}|nl^{n}\alpha ^{\prime}l^{\prime}s^{\prime})= \\ = \frac 12 \left ( n\lambda n\lambda n\lambda \right ) \left\ { \left [ \kappa _ 1,\kappa _ 2,\sigma_1,\sigma _ 2\right ] ^{-1/2 } \right . \times \\ \times ( nl^{n}\alpha ls| \left [ \left [ a^{\left ( \lambda \right ) } \times \stackrel{\sim } { a}^{\left ( \lambda \right ) } \right ] ^{\left ( \kappa _ 1\sigma _ 1\right ) } \times \left [ a^{\left ( \lambda \right ) } \times \stackrel{\sim } { a}^{\left ( \lambda \right ) } \right ] ^{\left ( \kappa _ 2\sigma _ 2\right ) } \right ] ^{\left ( kk\right ) } l^{\prime } s^{\prime } ) - \\ -\left\ { \begin{array}{ccc } \kappa _ 1 & \kappa _ 2 & k \\ l & l & l \end{array } \right\ } \left\ { \begin{array}{ccc } \sigma _ 1 & \sigma _ 2 & k \\ s & s & s \end{array } \right\ } \times \\ \left . \times ( nl^{n}\alpha ls| \left [ a^{\left ( \lambda \right ) } \times \stackrel{\sim } { a}^{\left ( \lambda \right ) } \right ] ^{\left ( kk\right ) } |nl^{n}\alpha l^{\prime } s^{\prime } ) \right\}. \end{array}\ ] ] using the relationships between the tensorial product of creation and annihilation operators and the tensorial quantities @xmath166 and @xmath167 ( see rudzikas and kaniauskas @xcite ) , the expression ( [ eq : ma - f ] ) for matrix elements can be writen down in terms of @xmath166 and @xmath167 . in comparing ( [ eq : ma - d ] ) to ( [ eq : ma - f ] ) we see that the summation over intermediate terms @xmath263 , @xmath264 , @xmath265 is already performed in expression ( [ eq : ma - f ] ) . so , in this case the racah algebra is exploited at the level of standard quantities @xmath166 ir @xmath167 . this simplifies calculations a lot : * for zero matrix elements are easily tracked down from triangular conditions even before the actual calculation is performed . in case ( [ eq : ma - f ] ) only the triangular conditions @xmath268 and @xmath269 are present , but their number may be greater in other cases . ( in the above , the notation @xmath268 means the triangular condition @xmath270 . ) * the tables of standard quantities ( see nielson and koster @xcite , karazija _ et al _ @xcite , cowan @xcite ) may be used . * the recoupling matrix is simpler in this case , and it has an analytical expression . so , the expressions exploiting the racah algebra at the level of @xmath166 and @xmath167 are much more advantageous than ( [ eq : ma - c ] ) . such expressions are obtained for all physical operators . for example , the expressions for spin - other - orbit operator are presented in papers horie @xcite , karazija _ et al _ @xcite and vizbarait . e _ et al _ @xcite , the ones for spin - spin operator - in papers horie @xcite and karazija _ et al _ @xcite , and the ones for orbit - orbit operator in the monograph jucys and savukynas @xcite . the shortcoming of the expressions of this type is that the racah algebra is exploited to its full extent in separate cases only . this is discussed in detail in paper by gaigalas _ _ @xcite . gaigalas _ et al _ @xcite have proposed a methodology which allows one to take all the advantages of the racah algebra in the most general case . according to the approach by gaigalas _ et al _ @xcite , a general expression of submatrix element for any two - particle operator between functions with @xmath22 open shells can be written down as follows : @xmath271{c } ( \psi _ u^{bra}\left ( ls\right ) || \widehat{g}^{\left ( \kappa _ 1\kappa _ 2k,\sigma_1\sigma _ 2k\right ) } } \right ) ) = \\ = \displaystyle { \sum_{n_il_i , n_jl_j , n_i^{\prime } l_i^{\prime } , n_j^{\prime } l_j^{\prime } } } ( \psi _ u^{bra}\left ( ls\right ) ||\widehat{g } \left ( n_il_i , n_jl_j , n_i^{\prime } l_i^{\prime } , n_j^{\prime } l_j^{\prime } \right ) } \right ) ) = \\ = \displaystyle { \sum_{n_il_i , n_jl_j , n_i^{\prime } l_i^{\prime } , n_j^{\prime } l_j^{\prime } } } \displaystyle { \sum_{\kappa _ { 12},\sigma _ { 12},\kappa _ { 12}^{\prime } , \sigma _ { 12}^{\prime } } } \sum \left ( -1\right ) ^\delta \theta ^{\prime } \left ( n_i\lambda _ i , n_j\lambda _ j , n_i^{\prime } \lambda _ i^{\prime } , n_j^{\prime } \lambda _ j^{\prime } , \xi \right ) \times \\ \times t\left ( n_i\lambda _ i , n_j\lambda _ j , n_i^{\prime } \lambda _ i^{\prime } , n_j^{\prime } \lambda _ j^{\prime } , \lambda ^{bra},\lambda ^{ket},\xi , \gamma \right ) \times \\ \times r\left ( \lambda _ i,\lambda _ j,\lambda _ i^{\prime } , \lambda _ j^{\prime } , \lambda ^{bra},\lambda ^{ket},\gamma \right ) . \end{array}\ ] ] in calculating the spin - angular part of a submatrix element using ( [ eq : ma - g ] ) , one has to compute the following quantities ( for more detail see gaigalas @xcite ) : 1 . the recoupling matrix @xmath272 . this recoupling matrix accounts for the change in going from matrix element + @xmath273 , which has @xmath22 open shells in the bra and ket functions , to the submatrix element + @xmath274 , which has only the shells being acted upon by the two - particle operator in its bra and ket functions . 2 . the submatrix element @xmath275 , which denotes the submatrix elements of operators ( [ eq : op - j ] ) - ( [ eq : op - n ] ) . here @xmath276 refers to the array of coupling parameters connecting the recoupling matrix @xmath272 to the submatrix element . phase factor @xmath277 ( for more detail see gaigalas @xcite ) . 4 . @xmath278 , which is proportional to the radial part and corresponds to one of @xmath279, ... ,@xmath280 . it consists of a submatrix element @xmath281 , and in some cases of simple factors and 3@xmath282-coefficients ( for more detail see gaigalas @xcite ) . in the next section we shall discuss finding of the recoupling matrix . now we shall analyse the submatrix element @xmath275 . as the angular part of expression ( [ eq : ma - g ] ) contains the tensors ( [ eq : op - j ] ) - ( [ eq : op - n ] ) , so we will discuss the derivation of submatrix elements of these operators , and present the expressions for these quantities . it is worth noting that these tensorial quantities all act upon the _ same _ shell . so , all the advantages of tensor algebra and the quasispin formalism may be exploited efficiently . we obtain the submatrix elements of operator ( [ eq : op - j ] ) by straightforwardly using the wigner - eckart theorem in quasispin space ( see rudzikas @xcite ) : @xmath283{c } \left ( l^n\;\alpha qls||a_{m_q}^{\left ( qls\right ) } ||l^{n^{\prime } } \;\alpha ^{\prime } q^{\prime } l^{\prime } s^{\prime } \right ) = -\left [ q\right ] ^{-1/2}\left [ \begin{array}{ccc } q^{\prime } & 1/2 & q \\ m_q^{\prime } & m_q & m_q \end{array } \right ] \times \\ \times \left ( l\;\alpha qls|||a^{\left ( qls\right ) } |||l\;\alpha ^{\prime } q^{\prime } l^{\prime } s^{\prime } \right ) , \end{array}\ ] ] where the last multiplier in ( [ eq : ma - h ] ) is the so - called completely reduced ( reduced in the quasispin , orbital and spin spaces ) matrix element . the value of the submatrix element of operator ( [ eq : op - k ] ) is obtained by @xmath284{c } \left ( nl^n\;\alpha qls||\left [ a_{m_{q1}}^{\left ( q\lambda \right ) } \times a_{m_{q2}}^{\left ( q\lambda \right ) } \right ] ^{\left ( k_1k_2\right ) } ||nl^{n^{\prime } } \;\alpha ^{\prime } q^{\prime } l^{\prime } s^{\prime } \right ) = \\ = \displaystyle { \sum_{\epsilon , m_\epsilon } } \left [ q\right ] ^{-1/2}\left [ \begin{array}{ccc } q & q & \epsilon \\ m_{q1 } & m_{q2 } & m_\epsilon \end{array } \right ] \left [ \begin{array}{ccc } q^{\prime } & \epsilon & q \\ m_q^{\prime } & m_\epsilon & m_q \end{array } \right ] \times \\ \times \left ( nl\;\alpha qls|||w^{\left ( \epsilon k_1k_2\right ) } |||nl\;\alpha ^{\prime } q^{\prime } l^{\prime } s^{\prime } \right ) . \end{array}\ ] ] on the right - hand side of equations ( [ eq : ma - h ] ) and ( [ eq : ma - i ] ) only the clebsch - gordan coefficient @xmath285 $ ] depends on the number @xmath286 of equivalent electrons . @xmath287 denotes reduced in quasispin space submatrix element ( completely reduced matrix element ) of the triple tensor @xmath288 ^{\left ( \epsilon k_1k_2\right ) } $ ] . it is related to the completely reduced coefficients ( subcoefficients ) of fractional parentage in a following way : @xmath289{c } \left ( nl\;\alpha qls|||w^{\left ( \epsilon k_1k_2\right ) } |||nl\;\alpha ^{\prime } q^{\prime } l^{\prime } s^{\prime } \right ) = \\ = \left ( -1\right ) ^{q+l+s+q^{\prime } + l^{\prime } + s^{\prime } + \epsilon + k_1+k_2}\left [ \epsilon , k_1,k_2\right ] ^{1/2}\times \\ \times \displaystyle { \sum_{\alpha ^{\prime \prime } q^{\prime \prime } l^{\prime \prime } s^{\prime \prime } } } \left ( l\;\alpha qls|||a^{\left ( qls\right ) } |||l\;\alpha ^{\prime \prime } q^{\prime \prime } l^{\prime \prime } s^{\prime \prime } \right ) \times \\ \times \left ( l\;\alpha ^{\prime \prime } q^{\prime \prime } l^{\prime \prime } s^{\prime \prime } |||a^{\left ( qls\right ) } |||l\;\alpha ^{\prime } q^{\prime } l^{\prime } s^{\prime } \right ) \times \\ \times \left\ { \begin{array}{ccc } q & q & \epsilon \\ q^{\prime } & q & q^{\prime \prime } \end{array } \right\ } \left\ { \begin{array}{ccc } l & l & k_1 \\ l^{\prime } & l & l^{\prime \prime } \end{array } \right\ } \left\ { \begin{array}{ccc } s & s & k_2 \\ s^{\prime } & s & s^{\prime \prime } \end{array } \right\ } . \end{array}\ ] ] in the other three cases ( [ eq : op - l ] ) , ( [ eq : op - m ] ) , ( [ eq : op - n ] ) we obtain the submatrix elements of these operators by using ( 2.28 ) of jucys and savukynas @xcite : @xmath290{c } ( nl^n\;\alpha qls||\left [ f^{\left ( \kappa _ 1\sigma _ 1\right ) } \left ( n\lambda \right ) \times g^{(\kappa _ 2\sigma _ 2)}\left ( n\lambda \right ) \right ] ^{\left ( kk\right ) } ||nl^{n^{\prime } } \;\alpha ^{\prime } q^{\prime } l^{\prime } s^{\prime } ) = \\ = \left ( -1\right ) ^{l+s+l^{\prime } + s^{\prime } + 2k}\left [ k\right ] \times \\ \times \displaystyle { \sum_{\alpha ^{\prime \prime } q^{\prime \prime } l^{\prime \prime } s^{\prime \prime } } } ( nl^n\;\alpha qls||f^{\left ( \kappa _ 1\sigma _ 1\right ) } \left ( n\lambda \right ) ||nl^{n^{\prime \prime } } \;\alpha ^{\prime \prime } q^{\prime \prime } l^{\prime \prime } s^{\prime \prime } ) \times \\ \times ( nl^{n^{\prime \prime } } \;\alpha ^{\prime \prime } q^{\prime \prime } l^{\prime \prime } s^{\prime \prime } ||g^{(\kappa _ 2\sigma _ 2)}\left ( n\lambda \right ) ||nl^{n^{\prime } } \;\alpha ^{\prime } q^{\prime } l^{\prime } s^{\prime } ) \times \\ \times \left\ { \begin{array}{ccc } \kappa _ 1 & \kappa _ 2 & k \\ l^{\prime } & l & l^{\prime \prime } \end{array } \right\ } \left\ { \begin{array}{ccc } \sigma _ 1 & \sigma _ 2 & k \\ s^{\prime } & s & s^{\prime \prime } \end{array } \right\ } , \end{array}\ ] ] where @xmath291 , @xmath292 are one of ( [ eq : op - j ] ) or ( [ eq : op - k ] ) and the submatrix elements correspondingly are defined by ( [ eq : ma - h ] ) , ( [ eq : ma - i ] ) and ( [ eq : ma - j ] ) . @xmath293 is defined by the second quantization operators occurring in @xmath294 and @xmath295 . as is seen , by using this approach gaigalas _ et al _ @xcite , the calculation of the angular parts of matrix elements between functions with @xmath22 open shells is reduced to requiring the reduced coefficients of fractional parentage or the tensors ( for example @xmath296 ) , which are independent of the occupation number of the shell and are acting on one shell of equivalent electrons . the main advantage of this approach is that the standard data tables in such a case will be much smaller in comparison with tables of the usual coefficients @xmath297 @xmath298 ( see jucys and savukynas @xcite ) and , therefore , many summations will be less time - consuming . also one can see that in such an approach the submatrix elements of standard tensors and subcoefficients of fractional parentage actually can be treated in a uniform way as they all are the completely reduced matrix elements of the second quantization operators . hence , all methodology of calculation of matrix elements will be much more universal in comparison with the traditional one ( see cowan @xcite , jucys and savukynas @xcite , wybourne @xcite ) . while seeking the matrix elements of one- or two- particle operators , it is necessary to obtain the values of a recoupling matrix @xmath272 , if we use the methodology by gaigalas _ et al _ @xcite ( see expresion ( [ eq : ma - g ] ) ) , or the recoupling matrices @xmath34 and @xmath35 , if we use the methodology by fano @xcite ( see expresion ( [ eq : ma - c ] ) ) . in the case of several open shells the expressions for matrix elements of every physical operator are published , where the recoupling matrices are in the form of simple factors . usually all these are written in the coordinate representation . they can be found in karazija _ @xcite , jucys and savukynas @xcite , karazija @xcite , rudzikas @xcite . meanwhile , for the more complex configurations , i.e. the ones having many shells , the recoupling matrices are much more complicated . beside that , the complexity of a two - particle operator adds to this . when the tensorial structure of an operator is complex , the recoupling matrix is rather complex , too , e.g. the spin - other - orbit operator ( see gaigalas @xcite ) . while attempting to calculate the angular part of matrix elements in all the mentioned cases , a general methodology for calculating the recoupling matrices is necessary . it has to be efficient , too , because the speed of calculation of angular parts of matrix elements depends on that . the majority of methodologies to obtain angular parts are based on the fano @xcite calculation scheme ( see for example glass @xcite , glass and hibbert @xcite , grant @xcite ) . in finding the matrix elements using this , one of the tasks is to obtain the recoupling matrices for direct and exchange terms . let us treat a matrix element of a two - particle operator acting upon four distinct shells @xmath299 for such an operator , the recoupling matrix in @xmath300 - space , using graphical technique of jucys and bandzaitis @xcite , is represented in figure [ fig : a ] . as we speak of calculations in @xmath0 - coupling , the analogous recoupling matrix in @xmath301 - space has to be calculated . in the figure [ fig : a ] the tree containing * b * nodes represents the bra function , and the one with * k * nodes represents the ket function . bra , as well as ket function , both contain @xmath22 open shells in this case . now let us treat a case when three distinct shells are acted upon by the operator . for example , the matrix element of operator @xmath302 is sought . then in the recoupling matrix the node iii will be on @xmath303 line ( see figure [ fig : a ] ) . this means that there will be two nodes on the resulting orbital moment @xmath303 line of shell @xmath44 . these will be nodes i and iii . the resulting orbital moment @xmath304 of the shell @xmath44 of bra function is attributed to the line connecting nodes @xmath305 and i. the resulting orbital moment @xmath306 of the shell @xmath44 of ket function is attributed to the line between nodes iii and @xmath307 . finally , characteristics @xmath308 of all possible intermediate momenta for that particular shell , which are summed over , are attributed to the line between nodes i and iii . so , in treating the operator acting upon three distinct shells , an intermediate sum in the recoupling matrix appears . similarly , two intermediate sums occur when two distinct shells are acted upon by the operator . and when it acts upon one shell only , three intermediate sums are present . the lines @xmath114 , @xmath309 and @xmath310 in the recoupling matrix represent the structure of two- particle operator in @xmath36 - space . see tutlys @xcite , grant @xcite for details . this is also valid for the exchange term , only the line @xmath311 must be connected to the node * d * , and line @xmath312 - to the node * c*. the first program to calculate the recoupling matrices of this type , njsym , was written by burke @xcite . it performs the calculations in two stages : 1 ) the recoupling matrix is expressed as a sum of products of the @xmath313 - coefficients ; 2 ) this expression is used in calculation . tutlys @xcite wrote a program to calculate angular parts of matrix elements , angula , which expressed the recoupling matrix in terms of clebsch - gordan coefficients before the actual calculations . while finding the recoupling matrix by the clebsch - gordan coefficient summation , this program eliminates trivial coefficients from the expression . bar - shalom and klapisch @xcite developed a new program njgraf . this program calculates the recoupling matrix in several stages . on the basis of graphical methodology by yutsis , levinson and vanagas @xcite , the recoupling matrix is analysed graphically and an optimal expression is found . afterwards , the value of recoupling matrix itself is calculated . an analogous program recoup was written by lima @xcite , and a program newgraph was written by fack _ et al _ @xcite . all these ( njgraf , recoup and newgraph ) are based on the same principle . an optimal analytical expression for the recoupling matrix is obtained by graphical method , and then the calculations are carried out according to it . but the optimal expressions they find are different quite often , and are not really optimal . as it was mentioned above , the methodology of angular calculation based on the fano calculation scheme has a shortcoming that the intermediate sums appear in complex recoupling matrices . due to these summations and the complexity of the recoupling matrix itself , the associated computer codes become rather time consuming . a solution to this problem was found by burke _ they tabulated separate standard parts of recoupling matrices along with coefficients of fractional parentage at the beginning of a calculation and then used them later to calculate the coefficients needed . computer codes by glass @xcite , glass and hibbert @xcite , burke _ @xcite , fischer @xcite , fischer @xcite and dyall _ et al _ @xcite utilize the program njsym ( burke @xcite ) or njgraf ( bar - shalom and klapisch @xcite ) for the calculation of recoupling matrices . both are rather time consuming when calculating matrix elements of complex operators or electronic configurations when calculating matrix elements of complex operators or electronic configurations with many open shells . in order to simplify the calculations , cowan @xcite suggested grouping matrix elements into classes ( see cowan @xcite , figure 13 - 15 ) . unfortunately this approach was not generalized to all two - electron operators . perhaps this is the reason why cowan s approach is not widely used although the program itself , based on this approach is widely used . gaigalas _ et al _ @xcite proposed a methodology where the analytical expressions for recoupling matrices are obtained for the most general case . in this methodology , analogically as in cowan @xcite , the matrix elements are attributed to four different groups . the operators acting upon only one shell belong to the first group ( distribution 1 from table 1 ) , the ones acting upon two - to the second ( distributions 2 - 10 from table 1 ) , upon three - to the third ( distributions 11 - 18 from table 1 ) , and upon four - to the fourth group ( distributions 19 - 42 from table 1 ) respectively . each group has a different recoupling matrix , @xmath314 - @xmath315 . they all are shown in figures [ fig : b ] - [ fig : e ] . representing the recoupling matrix @xmath272 when a two - particle operator acts upon a single shell.,height=510 ] representing the recoupling matrix @xmath272 when a two - particle operator acts upon a two shell.,height=510 ] representing the recoupling matrix @xmath272 when a two - particle operator acts upon a three shell.,height=510 ] representing the recoupling matrix @xmath272 when a two - particle operator acts upon a four shells.,height=510 ] let us treat the recoupling matrix @xmath316 first ( see figure [ fig : b ] ) . it represents the case when a physical two - particle operator acts upon a single shell . here , similarly as in figure [ fig : a ] , the graphical technique of jucys and bandzaitis @xcite is used . the bra and ket functions are represented as in figure [ fig : a ] . as the two - particle operator acts upon only one shell in this case , this operator may be treated as a single - particle one from the recoupling matrix point of view . using a graphical rule allowing one to cut two lines and connect the loose ends , we disconnect the nodes @xmath317 and @xmath318 from the general recoupling matrix . the part separated from recoupling corresponds to delta - functions only , @xmath319 , @xmath320 . in addition , using graphical technique it is possible to cut all the nodes until @xmath305 and @xmath321 out of the general recoupling matrix . all the cut nodes contribute the same delta functions which may be written as @xmath322 , @xmath323 . in the next stage , it remains to treat the part of recoupling matrix from the nodes @xmath305 and @xmath324 up to @xmath325 and @xmath326 . beside that , the lines @xmath327 and @xmath328 are connected in this remaining diagram . before obtaining the analytical expression for the remaining recoupling matrix we introduce a notation @xmath329 . it will help us to describe the procedure of obtaining analytical expression for the remaining recoupling matrix in a simpler way . so , the diagram in figure [ fig : f ] is denoted as @xmath329 . it equals to .,height=529 ] @xmath330 ^{1/2}\left\ { \begin{array}{ccc } j_{1 } & j_{2 } & j_{12 } \\ j_{3 } & j & j_{32 } \end{array } \right\ } .\ ] ] now , using the graphical rule of cutting three lines , we cut out the nodes @xmath331 , @xmath332 and @xmath333 from the recoupling matrix . thus we obtain a diagram @xmath334 . this coefficient in the paper by gaigalas _ @xcite is denoted as @xmath335 , and equals to @xmath336 ^{1/2}\left\ { \begin{array}{ccc } k & l_a^{\prime } & l_a \\ j & t & t^{\prime } \end{array } \right\ } .\ ] ] the diagram is cut from the nodes @xmath337 and @xmath338 up to @xmath339 and @xmath340 in the same way . it is expressed in terms of diagrams @xmath341{c } c_2\left ( k , k_{\min } , k_{\max } \right ) = \displaystyle { \stackrel{k_{\max } } { \prod_{i = k_{\min } } } } a_{1}(+ - + - ; k l'_{12 ... i } l_{12 ... i } ; l_{i } l_{12 ... i-1 } l'_{12 ... i-1 } ) . \end{array}\ ] ] it is easy to notice that @xmath342 corresponds to the coefficient @xmath342 defined in gaigalas _ @xcite . before going into investigation of the recoupling matrix pictured in figure [ fig : c ] , we denote the diagram @xmath343 ( see figure [ fig : g ] ) as @xmath344 . its analytical expression is .,height=453 ] @xmath345 ^{1/2}\left\ { \begin{array}{ccc } j_{1 } & j_{2 } & j_{12 } \\ j_{3 } & j_{4 } & j_{34 } \\ j_{13 } & j_{24 } & j \end{array } \right\ } .\ ] ] in the @xmath346 diagram , first the signs of nodes 1 - 6 , and then the moments are presented . while investigating the recoupling matrix ( see figure [ fig : c ] ) it is easy to notice that there is an additional graphic element . after cutting this out , we get a diagram the further investigation of which is very similar to the investigation of @xmath314 . that additional matrix element is @xmath347 . it is obtained by cutting the nodes @xmath337 , @xmath348 , @xmath349 , @xmath338 out of the diagram @xmath350 . after doing this , the diagram under investigation is split into two diagrams closely resembling the recoupling matrix @xmath316 . as they are cut in the very same way as @xmath316 is , we will not stop at recoupling matrix @xmath350 for details . in the methodology presented in gaigalas _ @xcite , the recoupling matrix is represented by a diagram @xmath351 ( see figure [ fig : d ] ) when the two - particle operator is acting upon three shells . similarly as for the recoupling matrix @xmath350 , the cutting out of nodes @xmath337 , @xmath348 , @xmath349 and @xmath352 leads to a diagram @xmath353 , and the cutting out of nodes @xmath354 , @xmath355 , @xmath356 ir @xmath357 leads to a diagram @xmath358 . in that case the diagram splits up into three simple diagrams , the further investigation of which is analogous to that of @xmath316 recoupling matrix . the most complex recoupling matrix @xmath359 ( see figure [ fig : e ] ) comes into view when all the second quantization operators act upon different shells . the part of this recoupling matrix from nodes @xmath317 and @xmath318 to nodes @xmath360 and @xmath361 , and also from nodes @xmath362 and @xmath363 to nodes @xmath325 and @xmath326 is very similar to the recoupling matrices described above , therefore their investigation is the same as that of the diagrams described earlier . we will investigate in more detail the part of diagram from nodes @xmath360 and @xmath361 to nodes @xmath362 and @xmath363 . that is pictured in figure [ fig : e - b ] . after cutting the diagram across four lines @xmath364 , @xmath365 , @xmath366 and @xmath367 and connecting these according the graphical technique of jucys and bandzaitis @xcite with a generalized clebsch - gordan coefficient , then connecting the lines @xmath368 , @xmath366 and @xmath369 with an ordinary clebsch - gordan coefficient , we obtain a diagram which is expressed via two @xmath313-coefficients . the exact analytical expression of this diagram is presented in the paper by gaigalas _ @xcite ( see expresion ( 29 ) ) . .,height=510 ] after cutting the nodes @xmath362 , @xmath356 , @xmath370 , @xmath371 and @xmath363 out of the remaining part and investigating the obtained diagram according to the jucys and bandzaitis @xcite technique , we obtain a diagram which corresponds to a @xmath372- coefficient . the analytical expression of that is presented in paper by gaigalas _ @xcite , expr . ( 31 ) . if a shell @xmath373 is beside shell @xmath374 , i.e. there are no additional nodes between nodes @xmath360 , @xmath361 and @xmath362 , @xmath363 , then the additional graphical elements vanish . so , we obtained the full analytical expression of recoupling matrix @xmath375 . if between the abovementioned shells a single additional shell is present , then we obtain an additional diagram which is expressed as a product of two @xmath313-coefficients ( see ( 30 ) from gaigalas _ et al _ if the number of shells is greater , then the obatined diagram in the most general case is written via ( 32 ) from gaigalas _ et al _ @xcite . the methodology that is based on the second quantization in coupled tensorial form , on the angular momentum theory in three spaces ( orbital , spin and quasispin ) , on the wick s theorem and on the generalized graphical technique of angular momentum , give the possibility to efficiently calculate the matrix elements of energy operators in general case ( gaigalas and rudzikas @xcite , gaigalas _ @xcite , this paper ) . the main ideas of this methodology are : 1 . a number of theoretical methods is known in atomic physics that facilitate a lot the treatment of angular part of matrix elements . these are the theory of angular momentum , its graphical representation , the quasispin , the second quantization and its coupled tensorial form . but while treating the matrix elements of physical operators in general , the methods mentiond above are applied only some part , or very inefficiently . + an idea is presented and carried out in the work gaigalas and rudzikas @xcite , gaigalas _ et al _ @xcite and this paper , of unifying all these methods in order to optimize the way to treat matrix elements of physical operators , to investigate efficiently even the most complex cases of atoms and ions . the wick s theorem is widely known in the theory of atom . up to now it was applied to the most general products of the operators of second quantization , i.e. when the particular arrays of quantum numbers for each operator of second quantization were not yet defined . in the methodology described there is proposed to apply the wick s theorem for the products of second quantization operators where they have the values of quantum numbers already defined . this allows one , using the methodology of second quantization in coupled tensorial form , to abtain immediately the optimal tensorial expressions for any operator . then , in treting the matrix elements of physical operators , the advantages of a new modification of the racah algebra are exploited to their full extent . 3 . while analysing the physical operators presented as products of tensors @xmath376 , @xmath377 , @xmath378^{(k_q k_l k_s)}$ ] , @xmath379^{(k_q k_l k_s)}$ ] , + @xmath380^{(k_q k_l k_s)}$ ] , it is possible to obtain convenient analytical expressions for recoupling matrices that must be taken into account in finding the matrix elements ( non - diagonal with respect to configuration included ) of any physical operator between complex configurations ( with any number of open shells ) . an idea is proposed and carried out , concerning the most efficient way to apply the tensor algebra and the quasispin formalism in the most general case , for the diagonal and the non - diagonal matrix elements as well , when the bra- and ket- functions have any number of open shells . the combination of all these improvements allows to efficiently account for correlation efects practically for any atom or ion of periodical table . the author is grateful to professor z. rudzikas for encouraging and valuable remarks . , `` on the method of calculation of matrix elements of the operators of atomic quantities in the case of complex configurations '' , proceedings of the academy of sciences of lithuanian ssr , b series v. 4 ( 27 ) , p. 45 - 57 ( 1961 ) ( in russian ) . , `` irreducible tensorial form of the effective hamiltonian of an atom and the diagrammatic representation in the first two orders of the stationary perturbation theory '' , liet . fiz . rink . ( english translation sov . phys . coll . ) , v. 25 , no . 6 , p. 14 - 31 ( 1985 ) . , `` energies of @xmath286 equivalent electrons expressed in terms of two - electron energies and independent three - electron parameters : a new complete set of orthogonal operators : i. theory '' , j. phys . b : at . mol . phys . , v. 17 , p. 2375 - 2392 ( 1984 ) . , `` reduced in quasi - spin space coefficients of fractional parentage and matrix elements of tensorial operators '' , liet . fiz . rink . , v. 18 , no . 293 ( 1978 ) . ( english translation sov . phys . coll . * 18*(3 ) , 1 ( 1978 ) from allerton press , new york ) . , `` expressions for reduced matrix elements of non - relativistic effective hamiltonian of atom in the first orders of stationary perturbation theory for configurations with two unifilled shells @xmath383 '' , in : _ spectroscopy of autoionized states of atoms and ions _ ( moscow , scientific council of spectroscopy , 1985 ) , p. 20 - 42 . , `` diagramatic approach to irreducible tensorial operators and its application to perturbation theory '' , in : _ spectroscopy of autoionized states of atoms and ions _ ( moscow , scientific council of spectroscopy , 1985 ) , p. 43 - 61 . , `` application of the graphical methods of angular momentum theory to the investigation of the expansion of stationary perturbation theory '' , izv . uchebn . zaved . 50 , no . 7 , p. 1403 - 1410 ( 1986 ) . , _ tables for the calculation of matrix elements of atomic quantities _ , ( moscow , 1967 ) ; english translation by e.k . wilip , anl - trans-563 ( national technical information service , springfield , va . , 1968 ) . , `` a program to calculate the matrix elements in multi - configuration approximation '' , in : _ sbornik programm po matematicheskomy obespecheniju atomnyh raschotov_. vipusk 4 . ( vilnius , 1980 ) ( in russian ) . Abstract:

Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.

Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered . Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video . Paper: [ sec : s1 ] the compactness of its core is an important structural characteristic of a presupernova star that affects whether it will explode as a supernova . a shallow density gradient around the iron core , as typically exists in more massive stars , implies a higher accretion rate and ram pressure @xcite surrounding the iron core during its collapse that must be overcome by neutrino energy deposition or other energy deposition to turn what is initially an implosion into an explosion . the connection between this structure and the likelihood of explosion has been noted many times @xcite , but little attention has been given to explaining just why the compactness has the values that it does , or why different groups obtain different core structures for models with similar main sequence mass . recently , @xcite quantified this compactness in terms of a parameter , @xmath1 where m=2.5 @xmath0 was chosen as the relevant mass for quantifying the density gradient outside of the iron core , which itself typically has a mass in the range 1.4 to 2.0 @xmath0 . in oconnor et al s definition , the time , t@xmath2 , chosen for evaluating @xmath3 is when the core has collapsed to its maximum ( super - nuclear ) density . as we shall show ( [ sec : s2.3 ] ) , for m = 2.5 @xmath0 , no substantial accuracy is lost if this parameter is evaluated for the `` presupernova model '' defined by when the collapse speed first reaches 1000 km s@xmath4 . the choice of m = 2.5 @xmath0 is justified as being larger than the iron core itself , yet deep enough in the star to sample matter that might accrete , especially in a failed explosion . since @xmath5 is inversely proportional to the radius of a fiducial mass outside the iron core , it is small when the density around the iron core falls off rapidly with radius and greater when the density gradient is shallow . that is , when @xmath5 is large , one need go only a shorter distance to include more mass . the systematics of neutrino - powered supernova explosions were explored as a function of @xmath5 by @xcite and @xcite , both of whom found that a small value of @xmath5 favored explosion . @xcite plotted @xmath5 as a function of main sequence mass for a variety of surveys due to @xcite , @xcite and @xcite , and a subset of that data is shown in fig . [ fig : f1 ] . note especially the distinctly non - monotonic behavior in the vicinity of 25 @xmath0 and 40 @xmath0 . for a polytrope of constant index and composition supported by a constant fraction ( @xmath6 ) of ideal gas pressure , the compactness defined by equation [ eq : compact ] will actually _ decrease _ monotonically with increasing mass when evaluated at a constant central temperature and small radius . this is because , for polytropes , the central temperature and density obey a relation ( e.g. * ? ? ? * ) @xmath7 for a given @xmath8 the central density thus declines as @xmath9 and the radius required to enclose a given mass increases with m. as will be discussed in [ sec : s3.1 ] , equation [ eq : poly ] works reasonably well for massive stars that are burning hydrogen and helium in their centers . the inner regions of such stars are non - degenerate and can be well represented by polytropes of constant index . as massive stars evolve , however , they develop nested cores with different compositions and entropies . lighter stars develop more degenerate cores in their late stages , especially during oxygen burning . the large gravitational potential at the edge of these degenerate cores implies a small pressure scale height that results in a steep decline in the local density @xcite . as a result , in heavier stars , the higher entropy actually leads to more extended configurations and larger values of @xmath5 . one does not have to to go out as far in the `` envelope '' of the compact core to encompass 2.5 @xmath0 , while in lighter stars that mass is reached farther out . this accounts for a general tendency of the compactness parameter for presupernova stars to increase with mass , especially for low metallicity stars where mass loss is less important . @xmath10 ) models from @xcite ( thick ) and for the solar metallicity models from @xcite ( dot - dashed ) . see also fig . [ fig : f9 ] of @xcite . note the non - monotonic behavior in both sets of models around 25 @xmath0and 40 @xmath0 . since the mass loss was ignored in the low metallicity models , the mass of the co core and the compactness continues to increase for those models at very high masses . [ fig : f1],scaledwidth=35.0% ] fig . [ fig : f1 ] also shows that the core compactness has significant non - monotonic behavior above about 20 @xmath0 , and possibly some fine structure below 20 @xmath0 . if this behavior is real and robust , it would have interesting implications for the explosion mechanism(s ) for massive stars , the masses of their compact remnants , and stellar nucleosynthesis . to address the `` real and robust '' issue , it is necessary to understand why this non - monotonic structure exists and its sensitivity to uncertainties and variations in the stellar models . the present study has several parts , some dealing with the systematics of @xmath5 found in new surveys of massive stars , others with the uncertainties one should assign to those results . in [ sec : s2 ] , three new surveys of massive stellar evolution are presented for stars of solar metallicity , very low metallicity ( 10@xmath11 solar ) , and solar metallicity with suppressed mass loss . these new surveys , though using the same physics as in previous works @xcite , are needed to provide a finer mass grid for examining rapid fluctuations in @xmath5 and to give additional data not archived in previous work . in [ sec : s3 ] , we address the heart of the matter : why is the compactness a non - monotonic function and , in some places , almost chaotic function of main sequence mass . the timing and location of several carbon and oxygen convective shells are found to play a major role . because there are multiple episodes of shell burning , the final compactness can be quite complex . in [ sec : s4 ] the sensitivity of these results to uncertain assumptions in the physics used in two stellar evolution codes , kepler and mesa , is explored . these uncertainties , especially the treatment of semiconvection and convective overshoot mixing , lead to large variations in the final co core mass that emerges for a given main sequence mass and account for much of the diversity of published results for presupernova evolution . since these uncertainties cloud the interpretation of the compactness plot , a further study is carried out in [ sec : s5 ] for bare co stars using both codes . provided the carbon mass fractions at carbon ignition are the same as in the full star models , the same trends seen previously for the compactness parameter are also found in these simpler cores , albeit with an offset due to surface boundary pressure in the full star . thus the non - monotonicity of @xmath5 can be considered robust and the co core mass is a somewhat better indicator of pre - supernova structure ( and to some extent explosion dynamics ) than the main sequence mass . finally , [ sec : s6 ] offers some conclusions . [ sec : s2 ] the models published in @xcite were aimed at sampling supernova nucleosynthesis and light curves for a broad range of non - rotating stars of solar metallicity . the resolution in mass necessary for that purpose was not particularly fine , so that study has been repeated using the same code and physics , but with a finer mass grid . the prescriptions for nuclear reaction rates , mass loss , opacity , convective overshoot mixing , and semiconvection are the same as in the previous survey . for the assumed mass loss rates @xcite , the entire hydrogen envelope is lost for stars with initial masses above 33 @xmath0 . heavier stars thus die as wolf - rayet ( wr ) stars with smaller helium cores than would have existed had mass loss been neglected . for the mass loss rate adopted during the wr - phase @xcite , the core shrinks to the extent that the final compactness becomes small again , thus the compactness of very heavy massive stars when they die depends upon an uncertain prescription for mass loss . is evaluated when the collapse speed anywhere in the iron core first reaches 1000 km s@xmath4 ( see fig . [ fig : f7 ] for other choices ) . notice especially the low values of @xmath5 for stars lighter than 22 @xmath0 , the irregular variations from 18 to 22 @xmath0 , and the subsequent rise to a maximum at 23 - 24 @xmath0 followed by a decline . for heavier stars additional structure , including a second rise , is found at higher masses ( fig . [ fig : f3]).[fig : f2],scaledwidth=35.0% ] the new survey ( fig . [ fig : f2 ] ) includes non - rotating stars with solar metallicity and masses in the range 15 to 30 @xmath0 calculated in increments of 0.1 @xmath0using the 1d implicit hydrodynamic code kepler ( table 1 ) . altogether , 151 models were simulated using the standard physics ( for variations see [ sec : s4 ] ) . nuclear energy generation was calculated , up to oxygen depletion ( central oxygen mass fraction less than 0.04 ) , using a 19 isotope network @xcite . a quasi - statistical equilibrium network and a nuclear statistical equilibrium network were used thereafter . however , a much larger `` adaptive '' network of up to 1500 isotopes was carried in parallel with the main structure calculation @xcite and was used to calculate changes in the electron mole number , @xmath12 . this was particularly important during oxygen burning when the quasi - equilibrium network could not be employed , but substantial weak interactions were already changing the central structure . this is the same approach that was used by @xcite , but a substantial improvement over what was done in @xcite . these models are collectively referred to as the `` s series '' stars - for `` solar '' . in addition to confirming the distinct bump previously seen around 23 @xmath0 the new study ( fig . [ fig : f2 ] ) shows other interesting features . fine scale variation of the compactness parameter persists throughout most of the mass range , but is particularly apparent between 19 and 21 @xmath0 . these features are further explored in [ sec : s3 ] . for this series of models , @xmath5 is small for main sequence stars lighter than 22 @xmath0 . it then rises rapidly to a peak , but declines again to lower values for main sequence masses between 26 @xmath0 and 30 @xmath0 . above about 30 @xmath0 , results for these solar metallicity stars are clouded by the effects of mass loss reducing the helium core mass , but if mass loss is suppressed , the compactness stays large above 40 @xmath0 with a slight dip around 50 @xmath0 ( fig . [ fig : f1 ] and @xmath13 ) . these features pose a challenge to the conventional notion that the difficulty of exploding a star is a monotonically increasing function of its initial mass and instead imply that models below 22 @xmath0 and between 26 @xmath0 and 30 @xmath0 may be easier to blow - up than other masses . this could alter how we think about the galactic chemical evolution @xcite . in order to facilitate the comparison with low metallicity stars where the mass loss rate may be negligible , another series of solar metallicity models was calculated for stars above 30 @xmath0 in which mass loss was artificially suppressed . these are the sh models covering the mass range of 30 - 60 @xmath0 with varying increments - 31,32,33,35,40, .. ,60 @xmath0(table 1 ) . this survey was truncated at 60 @xmath0 because the effect of the pulsational pair instability became noticeable around 70 - 80 @xmath0 . the 60 @xmath0 model of the sh - series has a helium core mass of 27.5 @xmath0 ( fig . [ fig : f4 ] ) , far greater than that of any of the solar metallicity stars calculated with mass loss . for all runs , the convective time history was recorded and checkpoints registered at representative points along the evolution including : 1 ) helium depletion - when helium reached 1% by mass in the stellar center ; 2 ) carbon ignition - when the central temperature was @xmath14 k ; 3 ) carbon depletion - when the central carbon mass fraction fell below 1% ; 4 ) oxygen ignition - when the central temperature first reached @xmath15 k ; 5 ) oxygen depletion - when the central oxygen abundance declined to 4% ; 6 ) silicon depletion - when silicon mass fraction reached 1% in the center ; and 7 ) presupernova - when any point in the core collapsed faster than 1000 km s@xmath4 . subsequent discussion will refer to these points as representative of the stellar models at these different times as he.dep . , presn . , etc . [ sec : s2.2 ] stars with equal masses on the main sequence , but differing initial metallicity can have different presupernova structure for a variety of reasons . most importantly , metallicity affects the mass loss . if the amount of mass lost is very low or zero , the presupernova star , including its helium core , is larger , and that has a dramatic effect on the compactness ( fig . [ fig : f1 ] ) . there are also other less dramatic , but important effects . low metallicity implies a smaller initial helium mass fraction ( and more hydrogen ) . the final helium core mass is sensitive to this and is reduced . nitrogen has an abundance just prior to helium ignition that is directly proportional to the initial metallicity and `` nitrogen burning '' by @xmath16n(@xmath17f(@xmath18o is an important exoergic , convective phase in the star s life that precedes helium burning . low metallicity affects the energy generation during hydrogen shell burning by the cno cycle , and this affects the boundary conditions for the helium core . low metallicity also affects the opacity , and the combined effects of opacity , energy generation , and mass loss determine if the star is a red supergiant or a blue one when it dies . this is especially true for the non - rotating stars studied here . the more compact radiative structure of a blue supergiant envelope places greater surface boundary pressure on the helium core therein and can affect its evolution . to illustrate the systematics of compactness in stars of low metallicity , we include here a previously unpublished set of non - rotating presupernova stars by heger and woosley with metallicity of 10@xmath11 @xmath10 . these used the same physics as the s series , but had an initial composition of 76% hydrogen and 24% helium with only a trace , 10@xmath11 solar , of heavier elements . the masses of these stars were 10 to 95 @xmath0 , though only a subset , 15 - 65 @xmath0 , is considered here . this restricted set , called the u series , contains 86 models with varying mass increments ( 0.2@xmath0between 15 - 25@xmath0 , 0.5@xmath0between 25 - 35 @xmath0 , 1@xmath0between 35 - 45@xmath0 and 5@xmath0between 45 - 65 @xmath0 ; ( table 1 ) . other details of these models not related to their compactness will be published elsewhere . are shown for the s - series ( solar metallicity ; thick line ) and u - series ( 10@xmath11 solar metallicity ; dashed ) stars of mass less than 30 @xmath0 . notice a slight shift of @xmath5 near the first `` bump '' . bottom : same plot for the u - series ( dashed ) and sh - series ( continuous ) models for masses over 30 @xmath0 . [ fig : f3],scaledwidth=48.0% ] . below 35 @xmath0 , the core masses are not very sensitive to metallicity . above 35 @xmath0 , the helium core is somewhat larger for the higher metallicity stars reflecting a more active hydrogen - burning shell during helium burning . [ fig : f4],scaledwidth=48.0% ] the compactness of these low metallicity models is shown , along with those from s and sh series , in fig . [ fig : f3 ] . without mass loss , a much larger range of helium and co - core masses is accessible ( figure 4 ) . one sees a continuation of the overall increase in compactness parameter with increasing mass all the way up to 65 @xmath0 , but with new features . the compactness rises rapidly above 30 @xmath0 to a broad peak around 40 @xmath0 and then , following a dip at 50 @xmath0 , resumes its rise . all of the stars above 30 @xmath0 , with no mass loss , will probably be very difficult to explode by any solely neutrino - powered mechanism . mass fraction at the time of core carbon ignition is shown for s ( thick upper curve ) , sh ( dashed ) and u ( thinner lower curve ) stars . note that the carbon mass fraction is smaller in stars that ignore mass loss and that the sh series tracks the u series very well . [ fig : f5],scaledwidth=35.0% ] below 30 @xmath0 , the compactness curve for the u series shows non - monotonic structure with peaks qualitatively similar to those observed for the s series in figure 2 , but with an offset of about a solar mass . the offset is most pronounced in the range 20 - 25 @xmath0 where the compactness starts to rise in the u series for a lower value of main sequence mass . the main cause of this shift is the lower mass fraction of carbon produced by helium burning in the u stars ( fig . [ fig : f5 ] ) . that value , in turn , affects the critical mass where carbon ceases to burn convectively in the star s center ( [ sec : s3.1 ] ) , shifting it to lower values , which causes the compactness curve to rise earlier ( [ sec : s3 ] ) . thus end their lives as blue supergiants . [ fig : f6 ] , scaledwidth=35.0% ] this variable nucleosynthesis of carbon for the s and u stars results from differing amounts of helium being mixed into the convective helium core as it grows during the final stages of helium burning . in fact , the carbon mass fractions for s and u stars in this mass range are very similar half way through helium burning , but as the helium mass fraction declines below 10% , the u stars are more effective at bringing additional helium in from their outer regions . each helium convected down turns a carbon into an oxygen . the u stars have somewhat higher helium core luminosities at this point and the structure at the outer edge of the helium convection is also influenced by surface boundary pressure from the hydrogen envelope which is different for red and blue supergiants . below 30 @xmath0 , the u - series stars are blue supergiants while the s - series stars are red ones ( fig . [ fig : f6 ] ) . the pressure at the edge of the helium core does not decline as steeply in a blue supergiant and the entropy barriers inhibiting convection in the outer helium core are slightly reduced . this makes the growth of the helium convective core easier . convective dredge up in a red supergiant could also possibly reduce the helium core mass , though this effect seems to be small in the present models . with rotation , many of these lighter u - stars would also be red supergiants in the end because of primary nitrogen production at the hydrogen - helium interface , and the effect would be diminished . above 30 @xmath0 the structure of the sh and u stars are very similar because both are red supergiants . in the past , it has sometimes been assumed that the helium core mass uniquely determines the presupernova structure of a star and hence that structure would be roughly independent of the metallicity for two stars that made the same helium core mass . while this is qualitatively true , the figures here show that this assumption is not very accurate for supernova progenitors below 30 @xmath0 . [ sec : s2.3 ] with the new surveys , it is possible to address a point of possible concern - the choice of mass ( 2.5 @xmath0 ) and time ( `` presn model '' ) for evaluating the compactness in equation [ eq : compact ] . the full evolution of a massive star to the point that its iron core collapses and possibly powers an explosion is being characterized by a single number here . what motivates the choice of this particular point in space and time ? @xcite explored the effect of evaluating @xmath19 at different fiducial masses and concluded that 1.75 @xmath0 might be a better discriminant of explosion characteristics rather than the 2.5 @xmath0 chosen here and in @xcite . the time of core bounce rather than initial collapse ( `` presn '' ) also seemed a more relevant time for its evaluation . recently , @xcite also examined the choice of 1.75@xmath0 , since the early neutrino signal is more sensitive to the structure around the neutron star . obviously smaller choices than 1.75 @xmath0 would not be sensible since they often lie _ within _ the collapsing iron core itself , and depend on different physics that occurs after that core has already reached high density , but what about values in between ? to address these questions , the collapse of the s series was continued until the central density reached @xmath20 g @xmath21 . this is about 100 times greater than the central density of presupernova s - series stars . beyond this point , neutrino trapping and , ultimately , the nuclear equation of state , would influence the dynamics ( fig . [ fig : f7 ] ) . as expected , @xmath19 rises with increasing central density since a smaller radius encloses the same mass . it also rises as the mass chosen for its evaluation decreases , since the average density enclosed by r increases faster than r@xmath22 . running kepler well beyond @xmath23 g @xmath21 to nuclear density gives values of questionable accuracy , but strongly suggests that very little further evolution will occur in the compactness so long as the sampling mass remains greater than 1.75 @xmath0 . as the figure shows , the compactness evaluated at 2.5 @xmath0 changes very little during the collapse from the presupernova star to high central density . at that larger radius , the hydrodynamical response time is longer than the time for the denser part of the core to collapse . ( red ) , and later when the central density reaches @xmath24 g @xmath21 ( blue ) . each pair of curves represent @xmath19 evaluated at the same time in evolution , but at different points in fiducial mass : 1.75 @xmath0(top ) , 2.0 @xmath0 ( middle ) and the default 2.5 @xmath0 ( bottom ) . little evolution occurs during the collapse from about @xmath25 g @xmath21 to @xmath26 g @xmath21 if the compactness is evaluated at 2.5 @xmath0 , but for smaller fiducial masses the contrasts seen at 2.5 @xmath0 are significantly amplified with time . [ fig : f7],scaledwidth=35.0% ] substantial variation does occur , however , for smaller sampling masses . smaller fiducial masses show a non - linear amplification of the structure in the compactness curve with time . large values get much larger than adjacent smaller ones , suggesting the development of islands of stars that may be hard to blow up . this is due to the tendency of high density regions to collapse faster under the influence of their own gravity and is particularly apparent for stars in the 18 to 22 @xmath0 mass range . this may account for some of the variability in outcome seen by @xcite for supernovae in this mass range . the robustness of @xmath5 evaluated at 2.5 @xmath0 , however , and its strong correlation with the compactness evaluated at smaller masses suggests that we can continue to use our standard choices of time and mass for its evaluation . it should be kept in mind , however , that structures that seem small in some of the plots for presupernova stars may become amplified by the further collapse . [ sec : s3 ] surveys of stellar evolution find a complex , non - monotonic behavior for the compactness parameter as a function of main sequence mass and metallicity . why is this so ? why does nt the compactness vary smoothly with mass as it would in a polytrope with a single index ? four factors drive the development of the compactness profile for massive presupernova stars . one obvious effect is the contraction of the core to higher densities in order to burn heavier fuels . this contraction increases the average density inside 2.5 @xmath0 and causes @xmath5 to grow with time . another is the tendency of lighter stars to have lower entropy cores and be more degenerate . degeneracy is responsible for the transition between stars that make planetary nebulae and those that make supernovae around 8 @xmath0 , but the effects of degeneracy on the post - carbon burning evolution continue to be important throughout the entire mass range studied here . third , as has been noted previously @xcite , is the disappearance , around , 20 @xmath0 , of central convective carbon core burning . above 20 @xmath0 , carbon fuses away without contributing a large excess of energy generation over what neutrinos are carrying away in the center of the star . model , a typical supernova mass , ( top : ) from carbon burning until silicon shell ignition , and ( bottom : ) from the end of first oxygen shell burning until 5 minutes before collapse . only the inner 4 @xmath0 is plotted and the time axis is plotted as the logarithm of time until iron core collapse ( @xmath27 ) measured in years . cross hatched regions indicate convection and integer numbers annotate convective carbon burning shell episodes . the convective carbon core burning starts about 1000 years before death and is followed by three episode of carbon shell burning . oxygen burning starts about two years before death and is preceded by a brief stage of neon burning . silicon burning is the last convective episode in the center . at silicon depletion , no oxygen shell is active , only a carbon shell at about 1.9 @xmath0 . shortly afterwards though , the third oxygen shell ignites in the incompletely burned ashes of the second shell . this final vigorous shell merges with the carbon and some neon burning shells shortly before the star dies . the operation of these shells , especially the ones between 1.5 and 2.5 @xmath0 , affects the compactness parameter.[fig : f8 ] , scaledwidth=48.0% ] fourth and frequently overlooked ( though see barkat 1994 ) are the effects of convective carbon and oxygen shell burning . lighter stars can have three or more carbon burning shells in addition to core carbon burning ( fig . [ fig : f8 ] ) . as these stars evolve , their central regions become increasingly degenerate , especially after carbon depletion in the star s center , and , by oxygen ignition , the concept of a chandrasekhar mass has some approximate meaning , especially for stars lighter than 30 @xmath0 . shells that burn outside the effective chandrasekhar mass , roughly 1.7 @xmath0 depending on thermal corrections , but inside the point where the compactness is measured at 2.5 @xmath0 , will considerably modulate the compactness parameter . [ sec : s3.1 ] fig . [ fig : f9 ] shows that @xmath5 remains nearly independent of the main sequence mass until after carbon ignites in the core . prior to this time , the fiducial point at 2.5 @xmath0 lies well within a much larger star or helium core that can be characterized by a single polytropic index . the tendency of @xmath28 to decrease as @xmath29 , as given by equation [ eq : poly ] , is offset by the slight increase of the burning temperature with mass , resulting in a nearly flat curve . as a function of main sequence mass for the s series models up to the point when the carbon mass fraction decreases below 1% in the center of the star ( `` c.dep '' ) . at each successive stage , the star has contracted to higher density and the average curve for @xmath5 rises . below about 20 @xmath0 carbon burns convectively in the core and this reduces @xmath5.[fig : f9 ] , scaledwidth=35.0% ] by the time carbon has disappeared from the center of the star though , things have started to change . a pronounced dip in @xmath5 develops for the lower mass stars , and the curve shows an abrupt , small rise at 20 @xmath0 . for current code physics and solar metallicity , 20 @xmath0 is the mass below which carbon burns convectively ( exoergically ) at the stellar center as opposed to radiatively ( endoergically ) . convection brings additional fuel into the burning region increasing the effective supply by approximately the ratio of the convective mass to the mass of the burning region . because of the high temperature sensitivity of the carbon fusion reaction , the energy generating region is small , so the enhancement is significant . during this longer time , neutrino losses carry away both energy and entropy , not only from the carbon convective core , but from the hot , overlying helium - rich layers supported by it . this loss of entropy exacerbates the natural tendency of lighter cores to have greater degeneracy and accelerates the development of a compact , white dwarf - like core structure - a dense degenerate core surrounded by a much less dense extended envelope . , averaged over the inner 1 @xmath0 of the star is shown as a function of initial mass at the times of ( top : ) carbon ignition and core carbon depletion , ( bottom : ) oxygen ignition , oxygen depletion and silicon depletion . very negative values of @xmath30 correspond to a non - degenerate gas and large positive values imply degeneracy . the cores of the lower mass models grow much more degenerate due to neutrino losses between carbon depletion and oxygen ignition . the structure around 20 @xmath0 in the curve for oxygen ignition reflects the brief appearance of strong , deeply - sited carbon convective shells in this mass range ( [ sec : s3.2 ] and fig . [ fig : f11 ] ) . these degeneracy curves at oxygen ignition and depletion are nearly mirror images of the @xmath5 curves at these times ( fig . [ fig : f13 ] ) showing the key role played by degeneracy in determining the compactness.[fig : f10],scaledwidth=48.0% ] as fig . [ fig : f10 ] makes clear , _ central _ carbon burning , by itself , is not the whole story though . most of the increase in central degeneracy occurs after carbon has been exhausted in the star s center . it is during the period between central carbon depletion and oxygen depletion that neutrinos cool the core appreciably and , for masses below about 30 @xmath0 , give it a white dwarf - like structure . during this long cooling - off time , contraction of the inner core is frequently held up by two , or even three vigorous carbon burning shells ( fig . [ fig : f11 ] ) , the first igniting shortly after carbon core depletion typically about 0.5 @xmath0 from the center . as we shall see , the presence and location of these shells is strongly correlated with how carbon burns in the center , so 20 @xmath0 remains a critical mass . it is ultimately the timing and location of these carbon convective shells , however , not just central carbon burning , that account for the structure developed during and after oxygen burning . greatly affects the location and extent of all three convective shells . for slightly larger masses , the first convective shell ( `` 1 '' ) disappears . after that mass carbon burns from the center radiatively out to the base of the former second shell . the location of the third shell is drawn as a dashed line when it that shell exists for less than a year at the end of the life of the star . ( bottom : ) difference between starting times and core collapse for various convective episodes ( oxygen burning - green and carbon burning - blue ) as a function of initial mass . [ fig : f11],scaledwidth=48.0% ] [ sec : s3.2 ] fig . [ fig : f12 ] shows the evolution of the compactness parameter for the s series stars from the time carbon is depleted at the center of the star until oxygen is similarly depleted . this is a critical period when the major features of the compactness emerge ( fig . [ fig : f7 ] ) . , as a function of initial mass at the time of central carbon depletion ( lower curve ; see also fig . [ fig : f9 ] ; oxygen ignition ( central temperature equals 1.6 gk ) ; and oxygen depletion ( central oxygen mass fraction equals 0.04 ; top curve ) . non - monotonic behavior caused by carbon burning shells is clearly evident above 18 @xmath0 by the time oxygen ignites , and a broad peak in @xmath5 is emerging around 18 - 24 @xmath0 with a `` notch '' between 19 and 21 @xmath0 . note the strong anti - correlation of @xmath5 with degeneracy below 22 @xmath0 ( fig . [ fig : f10 ] ) especially around 20 @xmath0 . [ fig : f12],scaledwidth=35.0% ] the typically low values for @xmath5 below 18 @xmath0 result from the operation of the first two convective carbon shells ( fig . [ fig : f11 ] ) . while the star is supported by these shells , its inner regions radiate neutrinos and become cool and degenerate . the rapid variation of @xmath5 in the range 18 to 21 @xmath0 reflects the response of these three shells to the disappearance of the convective core . when that happens , _ the first carbon burning shell disappears _ , and the second and third convective shells move inwards dramatically in response to its loss . these events do not happen simultaneously . the center of the star ceases to be convective at 20.3 @xmath0 , but the first shell has already gone out at 19.9 @xmath0 . the second and third shells inwards until this mass is reached , and then move outwards for bigger stars . the offsets in these masses and the rapid motion , first in , then out , of shells two and three underlie some of the complex structure in degeneracy and compactness seen around 20 @xmath0 . is plotted in each case and the format is similar to fig . [ fig : f8 ] , but here all stars , except the 20@xmath0 model ( which has a very tiny convective core ) , burn carbon radiatively in their centers . prominent in all figures is a powerful carbon burning shell igniting roughly 10 years before the star dies . note the migration outwards of the base of this shell as the mass increases . the shell that ignites farther out supports the star while the inner core emits neutrinos and becomes increasingly degenerate . the shorter kelvin - helmholtz time for the larger carbon - depleted core in the heavier star also leads to oxygen ignition at a substantially earlier time . the 20@xmath0 and 23 @xmath0 models end up with a large value of @xmath5 , while 20.5@xmath0 and 28 @xmath0 models give a smaller value . see also fig . [ fig : f13 ] . [ fig : f13],scaledwidth=48.0% ] from 21 to 30 @xmath0 , the compactness is most sensitive to whether , when oxygen core burning ignites , there is , or very recently has been an active carbon convective shell inside of about 2.0 @xmath0 ( fig . [ fig : f13 ] ) . an active shell supports the overlying star and relieves pressure on the oxygen core , allowing it to evolve as if it had a smaller effective mass . smaller oxygen cores burn longer , emit more neutrinos , cool more effectively , and become more degenerate . the relevant carbon shell can either be the third ( for 18 - 20 @xmath0 ) or the second ( for 21 - 30 @xmath0 ) shell . if that shell is inside 1.4 @xmath0 , the oxygen core lacks sufficient mass to ignite @xcite , so the most important mass range for the convective shell is 1.4 to 2.0 @xmath0 . the location of the boundaries of these convective carbon shells are given in fig . [ fig : f11 ] . the third convective shell is given there as a solid curve only for the mass range where it has a lifetime longer than one year . shorter lived shells do not greatly affect the evolution prior to oxygen depletion . based upon this criterion , the third shell only has a major effect in the range 19 to 21 @xmath0 . for heavier stars , the second shell dominates ( note that , for the sake of continuity , we persist in calling it the `` second '' shell even though the `` first '' convective shell has been replaced by radiative burning ) . this behavior is illustrated by the convective history during carbon and oxygen burning for stars of four masses : 20.0 , 20.5 , 23.0 and 28.0 ( fig . [ fig : f13 ] ) . none of these four stars experience central convective carbon core burning or `` first shell '' burning ( in 20 @xmath0 there is a very tiny convective carbon core ) . the relevant carbon shells are thus `` 2 '' and `` 3 '' , and they are labeled as such in the figure . at oxygen depletion , the 20.5 @xmath0 and 28.0@xmath0 models have small values of @xmath5 ( 0.13 and 0.15 , respectively ) , while the 20.0 and 23.0 have larger ones ( 0.19 and 0.21 ) . in the 20 @xmath0 model , shells 2 and 3 complete their major burning about a year before oxygen ignites in the stellar center . shell 3 is located at 1.32 @xmath0 , which is too small to allow oxygen to ignite . later , following a brief , inconsequential `` blip '' of convective neon burning , oxygen burning ignites in a core devoid of any nuclear energy sources out to more than 3 @xmath0 . the entropy is higher and the degeneracy is less at both oxygen ignition and depletion ( fig . [ fig : f10 ] ) . oxygen burning ignites late , with less than a year remaining in the star s life . ultimately the star dies with a relatively large compactness parameter , 0.26 . the 20.5 @xmath0 model , though only slightly different in mass , has a very different evolution . the third carbon shell now has its base at 1.62 @xmath0 which is sufficiently large for oxygen burning to ignite before carbon shell burning is over . when oxygen does ignite at the center , the resulting expansion extinguishes the carbon shell , leaving unburned carbon in the region outside 1.62 @xmath0 . some neutrino losses have already occurred in the oxygen before it ignited , but over the course of its burning , which commences much earlier than in the 20.0 @xmath0 model , more cooling occurs and the core becomes very degenerate . by oxygen depletion , the compactness parameter has a value of 0.13 , which declines still further to 0.10 when the star dies . for 23.0 @xmath0 , the evolution resembles that of the 20.0 @xmath0 model more than it does the 20.5 @xmath0 model . by now , the third carbon shell is igniting so late as to be unimportant . shell 2 , burning at 1.33 @xmath0 , however , again delays oxygen ignition to a late time . the oxygen burns in a core that , at the time has essentially no active burning shell except the helium shell far above it ( off - scale ) . it is easier for the layers above the core to contract since there is a time with no active burning , neither core nor shell . once it ignites , the oxygen core burns rapidly and at low density , producing a less degenerate silicon core . by oxygen depletion , the compactness parameter is 0.21 which rises to 0.42 in the presupernova star , the largest compactness of any model under 30 @xmath0 . for 28.0 @xmath0 and nearby masses , the evolution resembles that of the 20.5 @xmath0model , but with no third shell . the second shell has now moved out to 1.91 @xmath0 which is enough to allow core oxygen burning to ignite . there is always support by an active burning front , reducing the contraction of the outer core . oxygen burning lasts longer and occurs in a core of smaller effective mass . the compactness at the end of oxygen burning is back down to 0.15 , though this rises to 0.28 in the presupernova star . beyond 28 @xmath0 , the second carbon shell continues to move out and the effective core mass when it ignites oxygen grows . when the shell crosses 2.5 @xmath0 at 30 @xmath0 , the compactness parameter rapidly increases once more . this marks the end of the epoch of carbon shells . all heavier stars will have large compactness parameters ( fig . [ fig : f3 ] ) with relatively small variations introduced by the _ oxygen _ burning shells . the location and strength of the carbon shells prior to oxygen depletion thus sculpt a highly variable result out of what was a comparatively smooth curve at carbon depletion . in some sense , 20.5 @xmath0 and 28 @xmath0 stars resemble each other more at death than do 20.5 @xmath0 and 20 @xmath0 stars . above 30 @xmath0 , the carbon shells lose their influence . after oxygen finishes burning in the center , powerful convective _ oxygen_-burning shells develop that can also modify the structure either by themselves , or by interacting with existing carbon shells . the continued evolution serves chiefly to amplify the features already present at oxygen ignition ( fig . [ fig : f14 ] ) . having developed a degenerate core , further shell burning pushes matter out at 2.5 @xmath0 and reduces @xmath5 . the location of the first oxygen shell at silicon depletion correlates tightly with @xmath5 . its base is located between 0.8 and 1.2 @xmath0 and is set by the extent of the oxygen convective core . its extent correlates tightly with the location of its base . similarly , the second oxygen shell , when there is one , sets atop the extent of the first . the farther out these shells and the later their ignition , the more extended the core , which results into a shallower density gradient around the iron core later on ( higher @xmath5 ) . the peak in @xmath5 in fig . [ fig : f14 ] , around 23 to 25 @xmath0 , is enhanced by the migration outwards in mass of this oxygen burning shell . unlike the carbon burning shells , however , the outwards movement of the oxygen burning shell is not monotonic in mass , since the extent of the oxygen core varies due to the effect of previous carbon shells . as it recedes inwards from 24 to 28 @xmath0 , the @xmath5curve declines , leading to a pronounced dip at 28 to 30 @xmath0 . above 30 @xmath0 , the oxygen burning shells move out rapidly . ) and silicon depletion . the tendency of existing features to be amplified by the contraction , as seen previously in fig . [ fig : f13 ] , continues . bottom : the location of the outer extent of the oxygen convective core , which is also the base of the first oxygen shell is given as the lower curve labeled `` o.core '' , while the extent of the first oxygen shell is the curve labeled `` 1st o.shell '' . note the correlation between shell locations and the compactness . [ fig : f14],scaledwidth=45.0% ] [ sec : s3.4 ] fig . [ fig : f15 ] shows that , while the peak in @xmath5 at 23 @xmath0 continues to grow due to core contraction and the operation of the oxygen shells , the principal qualitative change in @xmath5 during this final stage of the star s life is a `` chopping up '' of the peak that existed at silicon depletion around 20 @xmath0 into finer structures . given that these structures will be amplified in the collapse ( fig . [ fig : f7 ] ) , they may yet affect the outcome of the explosion . , as a function of initial mass at silicon depletion and for the presupernova star . the peak at 24 @xmath0 grows due to core contraction and fine structure is imprinted between 19 and 22 @xmath0 by a strong oxygen burning shells in the last few days of it s life . [ fig : f15],scaledwidth=35.0% ] this rapid variation for a narrow range of masses results from an almost random decision by the star whether to burn oxygen or silicon in a shell first , the decision depending upon fine details of all that happened before . fig . [ fig : f16 ] shows the history of the convection following central silicon depletion in two stars of the s series with masses 20.1 and 20.2 @xmath0 . note especially the timing of the ignition of silicon shell burning compared with the growing extent of the strong oxygen burning shell with a base at 1.71 @xmath0 in the 20.1 @xmath0 star and 1.59 @xmath0 in the 20.2 @xmath0 star . in both stars this convective oxygen shell is very powerful , and eventually grows to include both the carbon and neon burning convective shells in one large aggregate shell shortly before the star dies . the oxygen shell in the 20.1 @xmath0 star drives a similar linking of convective layers and creates a large positive energy generation rate , but only _ after _ the silicon shell has already burned out and the star is close to collapsing . in the 20.2 @xmath0 star , on the other hand , the strong oxygen shell ignites _ before _ silicon shell burning and operates for a much longer time . ( top ) and 20.2 @xmath0 ( bottom ) stars of s series . each plot shows the evolution inside inner 4.5 @xmath0 during the -2 to -6 in the log of time until collapse . this last few days of evolution roughly corresponds to the time - evolution from the start of silicon ignition in the core until the presupernova stage . shaded regions describe convection . notice in 20.2@xmath0 , where the @xmath5(measured at presupernova ) is low , the silicon ignites int the core earlier and the shell c - o burning is very different . [ fig : f16 ] , scaledwidth=48.0% ] in the 20.1 @xmath0 star , oxygen shell burning initially generates , only a limited convection zone that slightly alters the structure of the star before silicon shell burning ignites and slows the contraction . in the 20.2 @xmath0 star , the oxygen shell becomes strong first and has already engulfed a large fraction of the co core before the silicon shell ignites . the 20.1 @xmath0 star ends up with a high @xmath5 , the 20.2 @xmath0 star with a low one . the strong oxygen shell in the latter pushes matter out to larger radii and leaves a less extended structure inside . .[fig : f17],scaledwidth=35.0% ] this sensitivity of the presupernova compactness to the timing of oxygen and silicon shell burning suggests that a correlation might exist between the time from silicon core depletion to death and @xmath5 . this is indeed observed ( fig . [ fig : f17 ] ) . the longer the strong oxygen shell supports the star after the initial iron core has formed from central silicon burning , the smaller @xmath5 for the presupernova star . these energetic , merged oxygen , neon and carbon burning shells during the last hours of a massive star s life are a robust feature seen in many models of stars above about 15 - 20 @xmath0 , both here and in previous studies @xcite . their study would be an interesting , though perhaps challenging topic for 3d simulation . if such small differences in the central structure of the star at silicon core depletion can lead to major changes in presupernova structure , even for stars differing in mass by only 0.1 @xmath0 , how sensitive might the results be to other `` hidden variables '' , such as the time step criteria and zoning . [ fig : f18 ] shows that , for some masses , a substantial variation in outcome can also be caused by varying these variables . the location of the oxygen shell is a sensitive function of the many convective episodes that went on in the same star during its earlier evolution , and to the physics used to treat that convection . and b : 20.1 - 20.5 @xmath0 . 1a , b - different zoning : default ( thick ) and @xmath31 of default ( dot - dash ) . 2a , b - time step : default ( thick ) , half ( dot - dash ) and double ( thick - dashed ) . [ fig : f18 ] , scaledwidth=48.0% ] as previously noted by @xcite , this sensitivity to small changes is especially strong for the stars in the 19 to 21 @xmath0 range . to quantify this behavior better , a subset of the s series was calculated using the same code , compiler , and physics , but slightly altered zoning and time step criteria . in each case , the standard calculations were recomputed using 50% finer resolution ( i.e. , @xmath31 the default zone size ) , and , in separate calculations , the default time step was multiplied by @xmath32 and @xmath33 . even these relatively small changes in operational parameters were frequently sufficient to provoke the star into two different final states . for comparison , we studied two distinct regions of main sequence masses , 17.1 - 17.5 @xmath0- region `` a '' , and 20.1 - 20.5 @xmath0- region `` b '' . as shown in figure 2 , the observed variations of @xmath5 in these two regions are quite different . panels 1a and 2a of fig . [ fig : f18 ] show that the solutions in region a are comparatively robust . decreasing the time step and or changing the zoning does little to alter the final values of @xmath5 . increasing the time step by a factor of @xmath33 does cause some mild variation , @xmath34 . panels 1b and 2b of fig . [ fig : f18 ] , however , show a much more pronounced sensitivity near 20 @xmath0 . the resulting values of @xmath5seem to be bimodal . small variations in mass , zoning , or time step can send the star down one path or the other . typical models in the surveys used 20,000 time steps to reach the presupernova stage and employed approximately 1000 mass shells of variable thickness . it is certainly feasible to double or even quadruple both the resolution and time steps , but the values used here are already conservative . to test the effect of finer time steps , the 21 s - series models from 19 to 21 @xmath0 were rerun with twice as many time steps . while @xmath5 for some individual stars did change significantly , the overall appearance of the pattern , including its rapid , but bounded variation between @xmath5 = 0.1 and 0.25 , did not . above 30 @xmath0 , if mass loss is neglected , the structure of the core becomes much simpler . the carbon shells have moved far out and no longer affect the solution . the oxygen core is larger and the oxygen shells farther out . because of the larger mass , the degeneracy is reduced and the compactness is always large . the most notable feature above 30 @xmath0 is a pronounced dip in @xmath5 around 50 @xmath0 . the dip is not large , but is seen in both the u - series and sh - series stars , albeit at slightly different masses ( fig . [ fig : f3 ] ) . it is also present in the compactness plot for the bare co cores studied later in [ sec : s5 ] . this behavior can be traced to the presence of a strong , extended convective oxygen burning shell during the post - silicon burning evolution of stars over about 50 @xmath0 . the lighter stars lack this shell ; the heavier ones have it . starting at 50 @xmath0 for the u - series , this shell is present at silicon depletion with a base at 1.8 @xmath0 . moving to heavier masses , the shell grows larger and its base moves outwards , reaching 2.5 @xmath0 at 65 @xmath0 . there is a sharp density decline at the base of the shell and because of this migration outside the fiducial point for measuring @xmath5 , the compactness parameter rises again as the star mass passes about 60 @xmath0 . whether this shell is present or not depends upon the timing of silicon core ignition and oxygen shell burning . recall the key role played by the carbon shell and oxygen ignition for stars in the range 21 - 30 @xmath0 ( [ sec : s3.2 ] ) . when the carbon shell was situated far enough out , oxygen burning would ignite before carbon shell burning was done with major consequences for the compactness . here , the oxygen shell plays the role of the former carbon shell . if it burns far enough out , the silicon core can ignite earlier . in this case , however , igniting silicon does not blow out the oxygen shell . it persists until the end . and has little effect on @xmath5 in this mass range . the bases of the 1st shells are not plotted for clarity , but they almost always perfectly match with the extents of the cores . notice , how the silicon core size responds as the oxygen core overgrows the silicon shell near 45 - 50 @xmath0 . [ fig : f19],scaledwidth=35.0% ] fig . [ fig : f19 ] shows the locations of various silicon and oxygen burning episodes as a function of mass for the sh - series models . though it lacks the time dimension of a full convective history plot , the figure shows that the size of the oxygen convective core increases monotonically with mass for these heavy stars . where the oxygen convective shell ignites is pegged to the extent of that convective core . at about 50 @xmath0 , the extent of the oxygen convective core passes the value needed to ignite silicon core burning . an oxygen shell ignites at the edge of that depleted core at about 1.8 @xmath0 . this is sufficiently large that silicon core burning also ignites , and after that , silicon shell burning , but both ignite without putting out the oxygen shell . indeed , the oxygen shell persists until the iron core collapses and forces the compactness parameter down . above 50 @xmath0 , the compactness parameter continues to increase until about 70 @xmath0 , where the onset of the pulsational pair instability becomes important @xcite . [ sec : s4 ] studies of massive stellar evolution by different groups yield substantially different presupernova structures and nucleosynthesis . a key quantity is the co core mass . the yield of elements heavier than helium , for an energetic explosion , is the difference between the mass of the collapsed remnant ( neutron star or black hole ) and the co core mass . as we shall see , the compactness is also quite sensitive to this quantity . table 2 shows the disparate values for the co core mass obtained by various groups studying the problem . for example , a 20 @xmath0 star may end up with a co core of anywhere from 2.71 to 6.59 @xmath0 for various choices of convective physics and assumptions about rotation . even for non - rotating stars the range is 2.71 to 4.99 @xmath0 . why are the values so different ? might using the co core mass as a discriminant for the presupernova compactness alleviate some of the sensitivity to uncertain code physics ? the effect of rotation is not surprising . rotation adds new mixing processes ( e.g. * ? ? ? * ) that increase the masses of both the helium and co core . shear mixing in differentially rotating stars can also erase some of the sensitivity to the treatment of semiconvection and convective shell boundaries . the large residual range of co core masses in non - rotating stars reflects these uncertainties in the treatment of convection and warrants discussion . uncertainties in the treatment of convection for non - rotating massive stars can be lumped into three categories : a ) the use of time - dependent mixing length theory ( mlt ) to describe the overall transport ; b ) uncertainties in semiconvection , i.e. , what to do about stellar regions that are unstable to convection by the schwarzschild criterion , but not the ledoux criterion ; and c ) the treatment of convective boundaries ( i.e. , overshoot and undershoot ) . a detailed review is beyond the scope of this paper . most modern studies use time - dependent mlt , if only for the lack of a viable , implemented alternative . semiconvection and convective overshoot can sometimes have similar effects since both allow convective regions on their tops and bottoms to grow smoothly when circumstances warrant it , and prevent the unrealistic fracturing of convective regions into multiple concentric shells . semiconvection additionally slowly mixes regions that , owing to composition barriers , would not have mixed if the ledoux criterion were strictly applied . a relevant case in point is the convective helium core . it has been known for some time that the co core mass is quite sensitive to the efficiency of semiconvection during helium burning @xcite . in situations where semiconvection is very small ( or zero ) , a mathematical instability can develop that leads to the bifurcation of the helium convective core and the production of an unusually small co core . in an algorithm that looks at the composition to determine convective instability ( i.e. , ledoux criterion ) , a single zone that is marginally unstable might temporarily become flagged as stable due to a trivially small increase in the mean atomic weight ( helium plus carbon and oxygen ) in the zone beneath . if this zone is flagged as stable against convection , burning during the next time step will increase the atomic weight farther in the region that is still convectively coupled to the burning at the center of the star without raising it in the outer core . this makes convection between the two shells even more difficult . the helium convective core splits permanently into two pieces . in the outer one , helium never burns to completion and the resulting co core for the star is small . if enough semiconvective mixing ( or rotation ) is included though , the splitting of the the convective core does not happen . in fact , considering the real situation in three dimensions , this numerical instability seems unphysical and should be avoided . overshoot mixing can also help bridge this artificial segregation . it also leads to an increased growth of the helium convective core at the end of helium burning that affects not only the co core mass , but the carbon mass fraction when carbon burning ignites . simulations by meakin and collaborators ( e.g. * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ) confirm that some type of mixing will always take place at convective boundaries defined by either the ledoux or schwarzschild criterion , although the exact formulation of this mixing remains uncertain . the treatment of convective overshoot and semiconvection in kepler has been discussed previously @xcite . semiconvection is parametrized by a diffusion coefficient that is manufactured from the local convective diffusion coefficient and the radiative one : @xmath35 where @xmath36 is the convective diffusion coefficient the zone would have had based upon the schwarzschild criterion , and @xmath37 is a free parameter that multiplies the radiative diffusion coefficient , @xmath38 . usually @xmath39 so that @xmath38 dominates the transport . the actual value of @xmath37 is not known , or even that such a simple formula captures the essential features of semiconvection . in past surveys using kepler , @xmath37 has usually been taken to be 0.1 , and , unless otherwise specified , that is the value used in this paper . in practice , this generally assigns the semiconvective diffusion coefficient a value of near 10% of the radiative one . overshoot mixing is presently treated very crudely in kepler . single zones at the top and bottom of regions flagged as unstable to ledoux convection are slowly mixed with a diffusion coefficient given by equation [ eq : semid ] . the convective diffusion coefficient is calculated based upon the schwarzschild criterion : @xmath40 with @xmath41 assumed to be a parametrized fraction , @xmath42 and with @xmath43 having a default of 0.01 . typically the convective diffusion coefficient so calculated is much greater than @xmath44 so that the mixing occurs on a time scale given by this quantity . this prescription lacks a physical basis , but at least allows convective zones the liberty of slowly growing into regions where mild entropy gradients would otherwise disallow mixing . to explore the sensitivity of the compactness and the co core mass to semiconvection and overshoot mixing , a subset of 16 solar metallicity models in the mass range of 15 to 30 @xmath0 was calculated multiple times using various settings for the both semiconvection and convective overshoot mixing multipliers . the masses studied were the integers from 15 to 30 and a total of 176 new models was calculated ( tables 1 and 2 ) . in these , the semiconvective multiplier , @xmath37 , was varied from 0.001 to 0.1 ( 16 models each with @xmath37 = 0.001 , 0.0025 , 0.005 , 0.0075 , 0.01 , 0.0125 , 0.015 , 0.0175 , 0.02 , 0.05 , and 0.075 in addition to the standard models with @xmath37 = 0.1 ) and are collectively called ss series . additionally , a set of 16 models was run with standard semiconvection ( @xmath37 = 0.1 ) , but zero overshoot mixing ( @xmath45 ) = 0 ( so series ) . all models were generated on the zero age main sequence and run until core collapse . the co core mass does not change significantly after carbon depletion , however , and presupernova values can safely be compared with other studies that stop at an earlier time . fig . [ fig : f20 ] shows that the compactness exhibits great deal of diversity depending on the efficiency of semiconvection . the mass resolution in these figures is significantly degraded by considering only 16 masses points between 15 and 30 @xmath0 , but the location of the peak in @xmath5 , when one exists , is clear . reduced values of @xmath37 give smaller co cores , more than spanning the space of published values . the carbon mass fraction at carbon ignition is also affected by the choice of convection physics , both in response to the altered co core mass and the mixing of helium at the outer boundary of the helium core that is altered when semiconvection is turned off . consequently the compactness , which is quite sensitive to both the co core mass and the carbon mass fraction , vary significantly . ) are shown in comparison with the s - series models ( top panel ) with @xmath46 . the s - series is plotted with the same @xmath47 increments as was used in ss series calculations . [ fig : f20],scaledwidth=48.0% ] for small reductions in @xmath37 , the peaks found for @xmath5 in the standard runs is robust . both the locations and amplitudes do not vary much . though not explored , we expect that small changes upwards of @xmath37 would have given similar results . when @xmath37 declines below 0.02 however , significant changes occur . with smaller @xmath37 , it takes a higher mass main sequence star to give a specific co core mass , so the peak that was at 23 @xmath0 shifts rapidly to higher values , ultimately leaving the grid . by @xmath37 = 0.01 , the peak is no longer clearly discernible in the mass range examined . continued reduction in @xmath37 ( bottom panel , fig . [ fig : f20 ] ) results in a compactness curve that loses most of its non - monotonic structure and increases steadily with mass . however , such small values imply a co core that is small compared with all previous studies in the literature ( table 2 ) . for @xmath37 = 0.001 , the 15 , 16 and 17 @xmath0 models closely resembled previous models calculated with kepler and other codes for stars with mass near 10 @xmath0 @xcite . oxygen ignition occurs off center in these models and propagates as a convectively bounded flame to the stellar center ( e.g. * ? ? ? a similar result was obtained for @xmath37 = 0.0025 for the 15 and 16 @xmath0 models . such stars are known to have a very steep density gradient surrounding the iron core , which might be a boon to those trying to blow up stars in a wider mass range , but contribute almost nothing to the nucleosynthesis of intermediate mass elements . were the observational limit on the maximum mass supernova to be pegged not far above 18 @xmath0 @xcite , models of this sort would be inconsistent with the theory of stellar nucleosynthesis . a model with 12 @xmath0 and @xmath37 = 0.001 failed even to ignite oxygen burning and would likely become an agb star with a degenerate neon - oxygen core and not a supernova . since this would be in contradiction with a large volume of observational data showing that stars down to about 8 @xmath0 do explode , we must consider values of @xmath37 much below 0.01 as unrealistic . turning off convective overshoot mixing in kepler also has a significant effect on the co core mass and carbon mass fraction , though not so extreme as that caused by large variations in semiconvection ( table 2 ) . [ fig : f21 ] shows the co core sizes and final presupernova @xmath5 of the so - series models compared with those from s series . the elimination of overshoot reduces the co core sizes ( top - panel ) , and as a consequence , the @xmath5 curve is shifted to higher masses . for example , central carbon burning shifts to being radiative at a higher mass compared to the s - series models with overshooting . . [ fig : f21],scaledwidth=48.0% ] these results , which imply that the success or failure of exploding a presupernova model of given mass will vary appreciably depending upon who calculated the model and the description they used for convection physics , are troubling . however , semiconvection and overshoot mixing are real physical processes that will eventually be better understood . some of the very small values for @xmath37 used here may not be physically realistic ( e.g. * ? ? ? * ) and the high threshold mass that they imply for making a supernova is inconsistent with observations . zeroing overshoot mixing is also unrealistic . bifurcation of the helium convective core probably does not occur . real stars rotate , and rotationally induced mixing reduces the sensitivity to semiconvection and overshoot mixing . we believe that our standard choices for @xmath37 and @xmath45 ( 0.1 and 0.01 ) are a good compromise for non - rotating stars since they avoid the unphysical splitting of the convective core , agree reasonably well with the results for rotating models ( table 2 ) , and are not presently at odds with any existing physical prediction . clearly this is an area where more work is needed . see @xcite and references therein for some recent insights . as a function of initial main sequence mass ( top ) and final co core mass ( bottom ) for the s - series models ( continuous ) , a subset of ss - series models with @xmath48 ( triangles ) and so - series models ( diamonds ) . though the definition of boundary of the co core inside a massive star is ambiguous , its mass can be a better discriminant of @xmath5 than the initial mass in most cases . [ fig : f22],scaledwidth=48.0% ] our results also suggest that @xmath5 , and presupernova structure in general , will be more similar for two models having the same helium and co core masses than for two that simply started with the same main sequence mass . carrying this to the extreme , the outcome of the explosion of two stars with the same co core mass will be more similar than for those having the same main sequence mass , but different co core masses . fig . [ fig : f22 ] shows this to be approximately true . the offset in peaks seen in fig . [ fig : f21 ] for the stars calculated with and without overshoot mixing is greatly reduced if @xmath5is plotted against co core mass rather than main sequence mass . similarly , the large discrepancy with the s series found for low values of semiconvection ( e.g. , @xmath49 ; fig . [ fig : f20 ] ) is significantly improved . note that the allowed range of co masses in the figure is much more limited for 15 to 30 @xmath0 stars if semiconvection is reduced significantly . just what constitutes the `` co core mass '' inside a massive star is ambiguous however , because there usually is no sharp decline of pressure at its edge ( [ sec : s5 ] ) . here we arbitrarily took the value inside of which the carbon mass fraction rose above 0.20 . differing values of the carbon mass fraction at carbon ignition due to changes in the initial composition or code physics must also be considered . even similar physics often has different implementations in various stellar evolution codes , so to further explore the sensitivity of the compactness curve to the way it is calculated , we repeated part of our study using a completely different code . mesa @xcite is a popular code for the study of stellar evolution which has been successfully applied to a large variety problems in astrophysics and is freely available . mesa has recently been applied to the calculation of presupernova models @xcite . it uses similar nuclear physics to kepler for energy generation during hydrogen through oxygen burning and a very similar equation of state and opacity tables . it can be constrained to use similar mass loss rates . here the red giant mass loss rates of @xcite was used in both codes : @xmath50 however , the two codes have quite different prescriptions for semiconvection and overshooting . given the previous discussion , those differences can be expected to cause changes that might be educational . mesa also uses different nuclear physics during silicon burning and iron - core formation that affect the post - oxygen evolution . in particular , mesa continues to use a 19 isotope network to describe the energy generation and changes in composition after oxygen depletion , while kepler uses a 125 isotope `` quasi - statistical equilibrium '' ( qse ) network @xcite . the latter is more stable and less prone to spurious temperature transients and is also able to follow accurately the appreciable changes in electron mole number that happen in these late phases . since the major features of the pre - supernova @xmath5(m ) curve , including the existence and location of peaks , have already been imprinted by oxygen depletion , we elected to compare the results of the two codes at that point , not for the pre - supernova star . this way , the post - oxygen burning differences are avoided and also the run time greatly reduced . mesa is a continually evolving code while kepler is more `` mature '' , and for this study we used mesa version 4930 . the stars studied are a subset ( table 1 ) of our s series , that is , non - rotating stars with solar metallicity . this version of mesa employed ledoux convection . for the mixing length parameter , @xmath51 , the free parameter @xmath52 was taken to be 2.0 , which is within the range found in the literature . in those zones flagged as semiconvective , the @xcite model was used . this calculates the diffusion coefficient as : @xmath53 where @xmath54 is the specific heat at constant pressure and the efficiency is tuned by the free parameter @xmath55 . we carried out a brief survey varying this parameter between @xmath56-@xmath57 , and found its effect to be rather complicated . for the masses tested , this range of @xmath55 gave a spread of about @xmath58 in the co core mass , @xmath47 difference in final mass , and a one order of magnitude change in radius . in general , for larger values ( @xmath59 ) the mesa results approached that of the pure schwarzschild case . the very low values , on the other hand , gave results that were very similar to one another , but quite different results were obtained using the larger values . the greatest sensitivity for the co core size was found to be between @xmath60 and @xmath61 . in our survey @xmath55 was taken to be @xmath62 as a midpoint between these two extremes , which is also well within the range used in literature ( e.g. * ? ? ? we also note that the work to eliminate or greatly constrain this parameter is underway @xcite . overshoot mixing in mesa is accomplished either by fully mixing the zones flagged as overshooting ( step overshooting ) or by applying an exponential cutoff to the diffusion coefficient calculated for convection in zones that are unstable by the ledoux or schwarzschild criterion . in our survey we have employed the exponential decay formalism , that is : @xmath63 where @xmath64 is the diffusion coefficient from mlt , @xmath65 is the height , and @xmath66 , the pressure scale height . the efficiency is then controlled by the free parameter @xmath67 ( see @xcite,@xcite for further details ) . , as a function of initial mass curves at oxygen depletion in the core for each series . [ fig : f23],scaledwidth=48.0% ] in general , the value of @xmath67 is quite uncertain as well @xcite . a value of 0.016 was used by @xcite for his studies of agb stars . since the stellar context here is quite different , we have performed some additional test runs . the effects of five different choices for @xmath67 ranging from 0 to 0.025 were explored ( table 2 ) . in the end , a value of 0.025 was selected for detailed study since it produced very similar co core sizes to the s - series models calculated using kepler(fig . [ fig : f23 ] ) . a value as small as herwig s had little effect and values much bigger than 0.025 resulted in the bump in compactness around 23 @xmath0 becoming very broadened and shifted to lower masses . though our understanding of overshoot mixing is not adequate to rule this out , there was no compelling region to use larger values that would have given larger co core masses for the heavier stars than previously published by others ( table 2 ) . , evaluated at carbon ignition , carbon depletion , oxygen ignition and oxygen depletion . compare with fig . [ fig : f9 ] and fig . [ fig : f13 ] for the equivalent runs using kepler . [ fig : f24],scaledwidth=35.0% ] two sets of mesa models were ultimately calculated - one with overshooting ( mov series ) and another without ( m series ) . each set had 16 models in the mass range of @xmath68 with @xmath69 increments , and both used the ledoux criterion ( table 1 ) . as expected , the results from kepler and mesa were nearly identical during hydrogen and helium burning , but started to diverge following helium depletion when the structure became more sensitive to the treatment of semiconvection and overshoot mixing . as shown in fig . [ fig : f24 ] , by carbon depletion , the discrepancy had become significant , especially around the critical mass for the extinction of central carbon convection , 20 @xmath0 , and continued to grow during oxygen burning . [ fig : f23 ] and table 2 show the comparison at oxygen depletion between the kepler s series and mesa mov series . the quantity @xmath5 for the mov series shows a non - monotonic structure similar to that in the s series , but shifted in mass by about 2@xmath0 . since the co cores are nearly identical for mov- and s - series models , the difference must result from either a different composition at carbon ignition or a different treatment of convection after carbon ignites , or both . the carbon mass fractions at carbon ignition are indeed different in the two studies . mass fractions in the mov series range from 0.34 to 0.24 , declining roughly linearly as the mass rises from 15 to 30 @xmath0 , while the corresponding limits for the s series are 0.21 to 0.18 . the larger carbon abundance probably accounts for most of the shift in the peak of the mov plot . as we shall see ( [ sec : s5 ] ) , however , the treatment of post - carbon burning convection also matters . even bare co cores with identical initial compositions often have significantly different compactness when evolved to oxygen depletion in the two codes . the results from the m series are not shown in fig . [ fig : f23 ] , but table 2 shows that the resulting co cores are much smaller , and the compactness thus differs appreciably , especially for the lighter stars . despite the shift , it is encouraging that the non - monotonic structure of @xmath5 as a function of mass in fig . [ fig : f23 ] and , qualitatively , the location of its peak , can be achieved using standard settings for convection physics in two very different codes . the study also highlights the dependence of the outcome on the co core mass . because of the sensitivity of the results to the carbon mass fraction at carbon ignition , outcomes will depend on the rates used for its creation and destruction . three major reaction rates are involved , each of which has some associated uncertainty : 3@xmath72 , @xmath70c(@xmath71o , and @xmath70c+@xmath70c . it is the competition of 3@xmath72 and @xmath70c(@xmath71o that sets the ratio of carbon to oxygen produced by helium burning . increasing the former raises the carbon yield while increasing the latter makes it smaller . as we have shown , small reductions in carbon mass fraction tends to shift the compactness curve downwards , especially the critical mass , 20 @xmath0 , above which carbon burns radiatively . the effects of varying the three uncertain reaction rates on massive stellar evolution , and nucleosynthesis in particular , have been previously explored by @xcite , @xcite , and @xcite for @xmath73 , and @xmath70c(@xmath71o and by @xcite for @xmath70c+@xmath70c , but none of these works explicitly focused on how these rates affect the _ structure _ of presupernova stars . we will not attempt a survey of all possibilities at the present time , but focus here on just the one rate for @xmath70c(@xmath71o . reaction rate . curves are labeled by a multiplier times the rate of @xcite . a value of 1.2 was used in the rest of the paper . the current 1@xmath74 range is approximately 0.9 to 1.3 . [ fig : f25],scaledwidth=35.0% ] historically , the large possible range for this reaction rate has been a source , perhaps even _ the _ major source of nuclear physics uncertainty in massive stellar evolution . recent developments ( e.g. * ? ? ? * ) have narrowed the error bar for this rate to less than 20% , which is not so much greater than the uncertainty in 3@xmath72 @xcite . for small errors in the rates , it is the ratio of these rates that matters most , so variation of @xmath70c(@xmath71o can act , qualitatively , as a surrogate for exploring the uncertainty in 3@xmath72 . the standard value used in this paper for @xmath70c(@xmath71o is 1.2 times @xcite who used s(300 kev ) = 146 kev b ; that is , our effective s - factor at 300 kev , near the gamow energy for helium burning , is 175 kev b. @xcite now report laboratory measurements and analysis that gives s(300 kev ) = 161 @xmath75 19 stat - 2 sys + 8 kev b , or a range 0.9 to 1.3 times the buchmann value . a subset of our s - series models was thus recalculated with varying multipliers on the buchmann rate . thirteen different masses of presupernova star were calculated in the mass range of 19 to 25@xmath0 ( 0.5@xmath0 intervals ) for each multipliers of 0.7 , 0.9 , 1.3 , 1.5 and 1.9 times the buchmann rate ( see table 1 ) . these are the sb series ( table 1 ) . [ fig : f25 ] and tables 2 and 3 show the results . decreasing the rate for @xmath76 significantly increases the carbon mass fraction at helium ignition , but affects the mass of the co core very little . the greater ( or smaller ) carbon mass fraction shifts the peak in @xmath5 , formerly seen at 23 @xmath0 for a multiplier of 1.2 to higher ( or lower ) values . for a multiplier of 1.9 , the peak would disappear altogether , and is not plotted for clarity . however , such large values are outside the current experimental range . the current ( 1 @xmath74 ) error bar for the rate translates into a multiplier between 0.9 and 1.3 , but even this smaller range can shift the explodabilty of massive stars enough to have a dramatic potentially observable effect on presupernova masses and nucleosynthesis . a total uncertainty of less than 10% in the combined error of 3@xmath72 and @xmath76 may be needed to pin down the mass range of supernovae that explode by the neutrino transport model to an accuracy of less than 2 @xmath0 . [ sec : s5 ] the importance of the co core mass motivates a separate study of the compactness of presupernova stars evolved from _ bare _ co stars of constant mass . it is to be emphasized that there is no direct correspondence between the results of evolving an isolated co core and those obtained for a complete massive star with the same co core mass embedded inside a helium core . the lack of a precipitous drop in density and pressure at the edge of a co core inside a massive star results in an evolution that is qualitatively different . the definition of a co core there , even by composition , is ambiguous @xcite . how does one count a partly burned helium shell ( and these are a common case ) ? nevertheless , co cores are simple to evolve and bypass the uncertainties associated with convection during the helium burning phase . if they display the same sort of compactness systematics seen for the full stars , one can have greater confidence in the result . as a function of mass at central oxygen depletion for bare co stars studied with kepler and mesa . top : ks ( solid ) and ku ( dotted ) ; bottom : ms(solid ) and mu(dotted ) . [ fig : f26],scaledwidth=48.0% ] a total of 380 co cores were evolved using both kepler and mesa ( table 1 ) . mesa used @xmath77 and @xmath78 and kepler used @xmath79 and @xmath80 . the calculations followed the evolution from central carbon ignition until the presupernova stage for the kepler cores and until the core oxygen depletion stage for mesa models . the core masses ranged from 3 to 25@xmath0 with varying increments : 0.1 @xmath0 increments were used for 3 to 10 @xmath0 , 0.5 @xmath0 was used for 10 to 20 @xmath0 , and 1 @xmath0was used for 20 to 25 @xmath0 . co core masses of 3 to 9 @xmath0 correspond , approximately , to the main sequence masses of 15 to 30@xmath0 studied in the s series . for low metallicity models ( u series ) or other models with no mass loss ( sh series ) , the maximum co core mass ( at 65 @xmath0 ) was 25 @xmath0 , and that sets the upper limit . the physics used to calculate the co core models was identical to that in the full star calculations . the different mass fractions of carbon for the s and u stars ( figure 5 ) , however , necessitated separate surveys . because of convection , the composition of a co core of given metallicity and mass can be taken as roughly constant . a good fit to the abundances in fig . [ fig : f5 ] is @xmath81 the mass fraction of oxygen was @xmath82 in each case . these 4 sets of calculations are denoted as : ks , ku , ms and mu . , i.e. - ks stands for kepler cores with initial composition from solar metallicity full stars ( s series ) , and mu stands for mesa cores with initial composition from low metallicity full stars ( u series ) . [ fig : f26 ] shows @xmath5 at core oxygen depletion point for the 4 series ( see also table 1 ) . the same sort of non - monotonic variation in @xmath5 seen previously in the full star models is evident in all cases but , as expected , cores with initial composition from u series ( ku and mu ) , have their first peak at a lower mass than the cores with initial composition from solar metallicity stars ( ks and ms ) . this same sort of offset was also seen in the @xmath5 curve for full stars of different metallicities ( fig . [ fig : f3 ] ) . for presupernova stars derived from bare co cores of a given mass and composition . ( top : ) for the mass range 3 to 12 @xmath0 , corresponding to main sequence masses from about 15 @xmath0 to 30 @xmath0 . note the large bump near 6 @xmath0 corresponding to the similar peak for main sequence masses 22 to 24 @xmath0shown in fig . [ fig : f3 ] . the offset between solar ( ks ; green ) and low metallicity ( ku ; red ) is also similar . ( bottom : ) a similar plot for the heavier co cores . the agreement with fig . [ fig : f3 ] is striking.[fig : f27],scaledwidth=48.0% ] above co core masses of 11 @xmath0 , the differences between runs using kepler and mesa are minimal . below that , one sees similar structures for ks and ms , for example , but there are differences . the major peak for the ks stars at 7 @xmath0 , is near 5.5@xmath0 for the ms stars and the peak of ku stars is also shifted down about 1 @xmath0 in the mu stars . even after removing the major dependence on co core mass by running bare co cores , there is still some residual difference resulting from the sensitivity of the location of carbon burning shells to convective and semiconvective physics in the two codes . the overall similarity of the patterns is encouraging , however . the compactness is non - monotonic with mass and there are regions of mass that will easier to explode than others . the kepler calculations of co cores were continued until the presupernova stage , and fig . [ fig : f27 ] shows the compactness parameter as a function of core mass for both the ks and ku series at this final stage . a comparison with fig . [ fig : f3 ] is interesting . the peaks at 22 and 23 @xmath0 in the full star models for the u and s series are reflected well in their equivalent mass co cores , 5.8 @xmath0 and 6.2 @xmath0 , respectively . the good agreement continues to heavier masses where the dip at 50 @xmath0 for the u - series appears as a dip at 18.5 @xmath0 in the ku - series . the mass of the co core in the u - model 50 @xmath0 star was indeed 18.5 @xmath0 . similarly , although not so precisely , the co core of the sh - series 55 @xmath0 star was 20.6 @xmath0 , close to the dip at 24 @xmath0 seen in the lower panel of fig . [ fig : f27 ] . the maximum mass co core in the sh series was 27 @xmath0 for the 65 @xmath0 model . for the u series , the corresponding co core mass was 26 @xmath0 . [ sec : s6 ] while characterizing the complex structure of a presupernova massive star with a single number is a gross over - simplification , considerable insight can be achieved by studying the systematics of the compactness parameter , @xmath5 . the compactness of a given presupernova core turns out to be sensitive to a variety of inputs , including not only the star s initial mass and composition , but the way convection is handled in the code , the nuclear physics employed , and the code used for the calculation . stellar modeling , at least of massive stars , is , in a sense , a statistical science . different groups will almost universally obtain different results for the structure and composition of a non - rotating presupernova star resulting from a given main sequence mass star , even without the complication of mass loss . however , for the same input physics , there should exist a robust pattern of results that can be sampled by running a large set of models . this is a paper about one such pattern , the compactness parameter . our study confirms the non - monotonic nature of @xmath5 noted in previous works , and explores its causes . [ fig : f7 ] shows that the choice of 2.5 @xmath0 as a fiducial point for evaluating the compactness , though arbitrary , is a good indicator of the behavior at other locations deep inside the star , but outside the iron core . whether @xmath5 is evaluated at the presupernova model ( @xmath83 km s@xmath4 ) , or at core bounce matters little at 2.5 @xmath0 , but for points deeper in , small variations seen in @xmath5 for the presupernova model are amplified during the collapse . small variations in main sequence mass might therefore result in significant differences in outcome for an explosion model @xcite . extensive new surveys of presupernova evolution are reported for both solar metallicity and low metallicity ( 10@xmath11 z@xmath84 ) stars ( [ sec : s2 ] ; table 1 ) . while the emphasis here is on presupernova structure and compactness , this is clearly a rich data set for exploring nucleosynthesis and supernova explosion physics , and this will be done elsewhere . major differences are found in the presupernova compactness for stars of the same initial mass , but different metallicity ( [ sec : s2.2 ] ) . the most obvious differences result from the differing degrees of mass loss expected for the two compositions , but there are subtle secondary effects involving the amount of helium convected into the helium core near central helium depletion . the growth of the helium convection zone results from a different structure at its outer edge which , in turn , is affected by the strength of the hydrogen shell , whether the star is a red or blue supergiant , and how much hydrogenic envelope remains following mass loss ( in the solar metallicity stars ) . even with mass loss suppressed , a substantial offset remains between presupernova stars of solar and low metallicity . generally speaking , the low metallicity stars become difficult to blow up at a lower mass ( fig . [ fig : f3 ] ) and may make more black holes . the underlying cause for the non - monotonic behavior of @xmath5 with initial mass derives from the interaction of carbon - burning and oxygen - burning shells with the carbon - depleted and , later , oxygen depleted core ( [ sec : s3 ] ) . as has been noted previously , the end of convective carbon core burning at around 20 @xmath0 for standard stellar physics , has a major effect , but not so much due to the entropy decrease during central carbon burning itself as to the effect this has on the ensuing shells . above 20 @xmath0 , both central carbon burning and what was the first convective shell switch to radiative transport . energy generation in excess of pair neutrino losses is unable to support core against further contraction , and the next two carbon convective shells are pulled down . their gradual migration outwards again causes the rise and decline , and rise again of @xmath5 above 20 @xmath0 . above 30 @xmath0 , @xmath5 rises to large values and , in the absence of mass loss , keeps on rising . there is an appreciable dip at about 50 @xmath0 , though , due to the outward migration of the oxygen shell which essentially plays the same role as the carbon shells did for lower mass stars . broadly speaking , then , the evolution of massive stars separates into four mass intervals characterized by similar values of @xmath5 . for a standard choice of physics and solar metallicity these are stars from 8 to 22 @xmath0 , 22 - 25 @xmath0 , 25 - 30 @xmath0 , and above 30 @xmath0(e.g . , fig . [ fig : f3 ] ) . stars below 22 @xmath0 and between 25 and 30 @xmath0 have low @xmath5 and might more easily explode . between 22 and 25 @xmath0and above 30 @xmath0 , it will be more difficult for the traditional neutrino - transport model to succeed . there can be large variations within those ranges and not all stars lighter than 22 @xmath0 will be easy to explode @xcite , but the distribution of stars that make black holes , for example , or important contributions to nucleosynthesis could be bi - modal . galactic chemical evolution studies using such non - monotonic yields have yet to be done , but may give quite different results , e.g. , for the s - process and oxygen synthesis @xcite . while the pattern seen in @xmath5 _ vs _ mass is robust , the locations of its peaks and valleys are sensitive to the treatment of semiconvection and convective overshoot in the code . these cause variations in the mass of the co core and the carbon mass fraction when carbon burning ignites . reducing semiconvection or convective overshoot makes the co core smaller and this is a leading cause of the large variations seen in the literature for many studies of presupernova ( table [ tab : cocore ] ) . smaller co cores can mimic the effect of reducing the main sequence mass in a calculation where the convection physics is held constant and thus make cores with steep surrounding density gradients up to a higher mass . however these cores , while easier to blow up will be essentially nucleosynthetically barren . extremely small values for semiconvective efficiency and overshoot mixing can lead to a discrepancy between the lightest stars expected to explode as supernovae based upon observations , about 8 @xmath0 , and that calculated by theory . caution must be exercised when using the co core mass as a discriminant , however , because the outcome is also very sensitive to the carbon mass fraction , and even to the treatment of convection after helium depletion . most of the models in this paper were calculated using the kepler code , but the mesa code was also used to calculate the compactness curve at oxygen deletion where its essential features have already been determined . reasonable agreement is achieved between the two codes provided that some amount of semiconvection and convective overshoot mixing is used in both . the non - monotonic nature of the compactness plot , in particular , is apparent in the results of both surveys . the effects of varying the uncertain reaction rate for @xmath70c(@xmath71o within its error range were also explored and found to have an appreciable effect . a total error of just 10% in the combined error for 3 @xmath72 and @xmath70c(@xmath71o can shift features in the compactness plot by a solar mass or more . to the extent the compactness is related to the difficulty of exploding a given model using neutrinos , the changes for nucleosynthesis and supernova `` cut - off mass '' are significant at that level . and binding energies for presupernova stars of the s series ( top : ) the binding energy above the iron core shown as a function of initial mass . despite the general increasing baseline trend , the relative variations closely follow that of @xmath5 . ( bottom : ) the final value of @xmath5 is plotted against the binding energy outside of the iron core . [ fig : f28],scaledwidth=48.0% ] because the co core mass plays such a major role in determining @xmath5 , we explored its systematics using a grid of `` bare '' co - cores . these differ from the co cores of massive stars which are defined by composition changes and do not have sharp declines in density and pressure at their edges . nevertheless , the same non - monotonic compactness curve results . this both confirms the robustness of the @xmath5 relation found in the other surveys and suggests that , for a given presupernova model , its final co core mass , not its main sequence mass might be a more accurate structural indicator . the same behavior was found for co cores studied using mesa . picking the co core mass circumvents some , though certainly not all of the uncertainty introduced by ambiguous treatments of semiconvection and convective overshoot mixing during core helium burning . for wr stars and other stars that have experienced severe mass loss , the presupernova co core mass will be the best indicator of presupernova structure . even for bare co cores , however , the mass fraction of carbon at carbon ignition remains an important `` hidden variable '' that will be sensitive to both the code physics and the metallicity of the star . while this paper has emphasized the relation between compactness of the core and its explodability in terms of the neutrino transport model , the results are actually more general . [ fig : f28 ] shows the binding energy of the matter outside of the iron core of the presupernova star as a function of its compactness . stars with larger values of @xmath5 will be more difficult to explode by _ any _ mechanism , both because of the higher ram pressure immediately after collapse and the larger energy needed to eject the matter outside the iron core . we gratefully acknowledge numerous valuable discussions with alexander heger and bill paxton regarding the kepler and mesa codes and their application to this problem . we also benefited from alex s expert insights into massive stellar evolution on many occasions , and his permission to include unpublished details of the `` u series '' low metallicity models . casey meakin and evan oconnor provided helpful comments on an earlier draft . we thank the anonymous referee for a careful reading of the submitted manuscript and many helpful suggestions . this research has been supported by the national science foundation ( ast 0909129 ) , the nasa theory program ( nnx09ak36 g ) , and the university of california lab fees research program ( 12-lr-237070 ) . kepler & s & zams-@xmath24 g @xmath21 & 15 - 30 & 151 & default + & sh & zams - presn & 30 - 60 & 9 & no mass - loss + & u & zams - presn & 15 - 65 & 86 & @xmath85 , no mass - loss + & ss & zams - presn & 15 - 30 & 176 & weak semiconvection + & so & zams - presn & 15 - 30 & 16 & no overshooting + & sb & zams - presn & 19 - 25 & 65 & varied @xmath76 + & ks & c.ign-presn & 3 - 25 & 95 & co core with s composition + & ku & c.ign-presn & 3 - 25 & 95 & co core with u composition + + mesa & m & zams-o.dep & 15 - 30 & 16 & default + & mov & zams-o.dep & 15 - 30 & 16 & with overshooting + & ms & c.ign-o.dep & 3 - 25 & 95 & co core with s composition + & mu & c.ign-o.dep & 3 - 25 & 95 & co core with u composition + ccccccccccc 4.84 & 2.97 & 7.17 & 4.94 & 9.65 & 7.20 & @xmath86 & @xmath87 ( ? ) & c.dep & @xmath88 & @xcite + 4.0 & 2.02 & 6.0 & 3.70 & 8.0 & 5.75 & & o.dep & @xmath89 & @xcite + 4.21 & 2.44 & 6.27 & 4.13 & 8.50 & 6.27 & @xmath90 & @xmath87 & si.dep & @xmath91 & @xcite + 5.68 & 3.76 & 8.65 & 6.59 & 10.0 & 8.63 & @xmath90 & @xmath87 & si.dep & and rotation & @xcite + 3.85 & 2.19 & 5.70&3.54 & 5.18 & 7.73 & @xmath92 & @xmath93 & o.dep & & @xcite + 4.97 & 2.56 & 7.31 & 3.83 & 9.80 & 5.48 & & presn & @xmath94 & @xcite + 5.37 & 3.59 & wr&5.53 & wr&6.63 & & presn & and rotation & @xcite + 4.35 & 3.14 & 6.21 & 4.93 & 8.25 & 6.95 & @xmath95 & @xmath96 & presn & @xmath97 & kepler , s + 4.44 & 3.14 & 7.18 & 5.61 & 9.07 & 7.35 & @xmath95 & @xmath96 & presn & and rotation & kepler + 4.29 & 3.08 & 6.27 & 4.99 & 8.50 & 7.18 & @xmath95 & @xmath96 & presn & @xmath98 & kepler , ss + 4.15 & 2.93 & 6.22 & 4.59 & 8.40 & 6.39 & @xmath95 & @xmath96 & presn & @xmath99 & kepler , ss + 4.09 & 1.96 & 6.00 & 2.95 & 8.30 & 4.40 & @xmath95 & @xmath96 & presn & @xmath100 & kepler , ss + 3.98 & 1.63 & 6.08 & 2.71 & 8.42 & 4.11 & @xmath95 & @xmath96 & presn & @xmath101 & kepler , ss + - & - & 6.22 & 4.96 & 8.28 & 7.00 & @xmath95 & @xmath96 & presn & 1.5@xmath102buchmann & kepler , sb + - & - & 6.21 & 4.90 & 8.26 & 6.98 & @xmath95 & @xmath96 & presn & 1.3@xmath102buchmann & kepler , sb + - & - & 6.17 & 4.96 & 8.23 & 6.99 & @xmath95 & @xmath96 & presn & 0.9@xmath102buchmann & kepler , sb + - & - & 6.16 & 4.94 & 8.21 & 6.99 & @xmath95 & @xmath96 & presn & 0.7@xmath102buchmann & kepler , sb + 4.19 & 2.70 & 6.11 & 4.38 & 8.14 & 6.27 & @xmath95 & @xmath96 & presn & @xmath103 & kepler , so + 3.77 & 1.96 & 5.81 & 3.47 & 7.31 & 3.91 & @xmath95 & @xmath96 & o.dep & @xmath104 & mesa , m + 4.01 & 2.21 & - & - & 7.80 & 5.16 & @xmath95 & @xmath96 & o.dep & @xmath105 & mesa + 4.20 & 2.39 & - & - & 8.06 & 5.47 & @xmath95 & @xmath96 & o.dep & @xmath106 & mesa + 4.41 & 2.61 & - & - & 8.34 & 5.81 & @xmath95 & @xmath96 & o.dep & @xmath107 & mesa + 4.85 & 3.05 & 6.92 & 4.77 & 9.28 & 6.84 & @xmath95 & @xmath96 & o.dep & @xmath108 & mesa , mov + [ tab : cocore ] Abstract:

Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.

Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered . Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video . Paper: in the following we want to give a new explanation of the area law of black hole ( bh ) entropy and the more general and stronger holographic principle . furthermore , we provide ( in our view ) convincing arguments that an important structural ingredient of the deep structure of our quantum vacuum is a network of microscopic wormholes . in contrast to e.g. string theory and loop quantum gravity ( lqg ) , which both employ the quantum laws more or less unaltered all the way down to the remote planck scale , we regard this as an at least debatable assumption . we rather view the holographic hypothesis as a means to understand how both quantum theory and gravitation do emerge as derived and secondary theories from a more fundamental theory living on a more microscopic scale . a central role in this enterprise is played by an analysis of the microscopic structure of the quantum vacuum which leads to the key concept of wormhole spaces . this important conceptual structure makes it possible to understand the holographic aspects of quantum gravity , on the one hand , and the ( non - local ) entanglement phenomena pervading ordinary quantum physics , on the other hand , in a relatively natural way . furthermore we think that there exist links to the old ideas of e.g. sakharov and zeldovich , dubbed induced gravity ( see for example @xcite,@xcite,@xcite,@xcite ) . some words are in order regarding the relation of our investigation to the analysis of bh entropy in , say , string theory . three scenarios are in our view in principle possible . either , both approaches adress the same phenomena in different languages , or they deal with them on different scales of resolution of space - time . be that as it may , we think that our observation that the true ground state of our quantum vacuum seems to be what we call a wormhole space ( see section [ worm ] ) is an aspect which is not apparent in the original string theory approach and may be helpful to fix the proper ground state in string theory . in @xcite bekenstein remarked that the deeper meaning of black - hole entropy ( bh - entropy ) remains mysterious . he asks , is it similar to that of ordinary entropy , i.e. the log of a counting of internal bh - states , associated with a single bh - exterior ? ( @xcite,@xcite or @xcite ) . or , similarly , is it the log of the number of ways , in which the bh might be formed . or is it the log of the number of horizon quantum states ? ( @xcite,@xcite ) . does it stand for information , lost in the transcendence of the hallowed principle of unitary evolution ? ( @xcite,@xcite ) . he then claims that the usefulness of any proposed interpretation of bh - entropy depends on how well it relates to the original `` statistical '' aspect of entropy as a measure of disorder , missing information , multiplicity of microstates compatible with a given macrostate , etc . quite a few workers in the field argue that the peculiar dependence of bh - entropy on the area of the event horizon points to the fact that the degrees of freedom ( dof ) , responsible for bh - entropy , are situated near the event horizon . this seems to be further corroborated by the corresponding behavior of the so - called entanglement entropy , i.e. its ( apparent ) linear dependence on the area of the dividing surface ( cf . , just to mention a few sources , @xcite,@xcite,@xcite or the lively debate in @xcite , concerning entanglement entropy in a more general setting , @xcite,@xcite ) . this linear dependence does however not generally hold without further qualifications . it does in particular not hold for excited states ( see @xcite ) ! that is , while some particular sort of entanglement certainly plays an important role in this context , the real question is in our view the scale of resolution of space - time where this entanglement becomes effective and the nature of the quantum vacuum on this level of resolution . + remark : we want to emphasize the in our view crucial ( but frequently apparently not fully appreciated ) point that the entropy content of a bh is maximal . + we think , the usual version of entanglement , we observe on the scales of ordinary quantum theory , is only an epiphenomenon , representing rather the coarse - grained effect of a hidden structure which lives on a much more microscopic scale . i.e. , we are sceptical whether on such a microscopic scale the quantum vacuum can still be treated in the way of an ordinary quantum field theory vacuum as suggested in some of the papers cited above . we think , the maximum - entropy property of the bh - interior suggests another interpretation . we will come back to this point in more detail in section [ 4 ] ( cf . also the sceptical remarks in some of the review papers by wald , e.g. @xcite ( see in particular sect.6 , open issues ) , @xcite ( see in particular sect.4 , some unresolved issues and puzzles],@xcite ) . as bh - entropy is widely regarded as an observational window into the more hidden and primordial quantum underground of space - time , it should be expected that it can be naturally explained within the frameworks of the leading candidates of such a theory , i.e. , to mention the most prominent , string theory or lqg . for certain extreme situations string theory manages to give an explanation of the bh - entropy - area law . whether the explanation is really natural is perhaps debatable ( it relies in fact on a number of assumptions and correspondences as e.g. peculiar intersections of various classes of p - branes ) . in a sense , it is rather a correspondence between bh - behavior and the configurational entropy of certain string states . to mention some representative papers , @xcite,@xcite,@xcite,@xcite,@xcite,@xcite . in lqg , on the other hand , it is assumed from the outset ( at least as far as we can see ) that the corresponding dof are sitting at the bh - horizon . therefore the observed area dependence of bh - entropy is perhaps not so surprising ( cf . e.g. @xcite,@xcite ) . in the enumeration of the most promising candidates for a theory of quantum gravity one approach is usually left out which , we nevertheless think , has a certain potential . one may , for example , tentatively divide quantum gravity candidates into roughly three groups , the relativisation of quantum theory ( with e.g. lqg and causal set theory as members ) , the quantisation of general relativity ( string theory being a prominent candidate ) or third , theories which underlie both general relativity and quantum theory but are in fact more fundamental and structurally different from both and contain these two pillars of modern physics as derived and perhaps merely effective sub - theories , living on coarser scales ( cf . e.g. @xcite ) . in the following we want to develop such a model theory in more detail . as far as we can see , such a philosophy is also shared by t hooft who emphasized this point in quite a few papers ( see e.g. @xcite,@xcite,@xcite,@xcite ) . we quote from @xcite : _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ it may still be possible that the quantum mechanical nature of the phenomenological laws of nature at the atomic scale can be attributed to an underlying law that is deterministic at the planck scale but with chaotic effects at all larger scales since , according to our philosophy , quantum states are identified with equivalence classes _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ furthermore : _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ it is the author s suspicion however , that these hidden variable theories failed because they were based far too much upon notions from everyday life and ` ordinary physics ' and in particular because general relativistic effects have not been taken into account properly . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ while t hooft usually chooses his model theories from the cellular automaton ( ca ) class , we are adopting a point of view which is on the one hand more general and flexible but , on the other hand , technically more difficult and complex . instead of a relatively rigid underlying geometric substratum in the case of ca ( typically some fixed regular lattice ) on which the ca are evolving according to a given fixed ( typically local ) ca - law , we are employing quite irregular , dynamic geometric structures called by us cellular networks , the main point being that connections ( edges or links ) between the respective nodes or cells can be created or annihilated according to a dynamical law which , in addition , determines the evolution of the local node- and edge - states . to put it briefly , the ` matter distribution ' ( i.e. the global pattern of node - states ) acts on the geometry of the network ( the global pattern of active edges ) and vice versa . thus , as in general relativity , the network is supposed to find both its internal geometry and its matter - energy distribution with the help of a generalized dynamical law which intertwines the two aspects ( cf . e.g. @xcite or @xcite and further references given there ) . technically , the geometric substructure can be modelled by large , usually quite irregular ( random ) graphs . to make our point clear , this approach should not be confused with e.g. the spin network approach in lqg or various forms of ( dynamical ) triangulations . our networks are usually extremely irregular and wildly fluctuating on a microscopic scale , resembling rather wheeler s space - time foam , and smooth geometric structures ( as e.g. dimensional notions ) are hoped to emerge via some sort of a geometric renormalisation process ( in fact a very particular organized form of coarse - graining steps ) . some of the interesting deeper mathematical aspects can for example be looked up in @xcite . in our dynamical network approach to quantum space - time physics the nodes are assumed to represent cells of some microscopic size ( presumably planck size ) , the internal details of which can not be further resolved in principle or are ignored and averaged over for convenience and will be represented instead by a simple ansatz for a local ( node ) state . it can perhaps be compared with the many existing spin - models which are designed to implement certain characteristic features of complex solids . this is more or less the same philosophy as in the ca - framework . the elementary connections between the nodes ( the edges in graph theory ) are assumed to represent elementary interactions or information channels among the cells and also carry simple edge - states . we made a detailed numerical analysis of the behavior of such networks in @xcite . + remark : we would like to emphasize however , that our approach does not really rely on this particular framework . it rather serves as a means to illustrate the various steps in our analysis within a concrete model theory . the paper is organized as follows . in the next section we analyse the basic substratum , i.e. the microscopic patterns of vacuum fluctuations , in particular the negative energy fluctuations . in section [ worm ] we describe the three different roads which lead ( in our view : inevitably ) to the concept of wormhole space . the preparatory sections 2 and 3 are then amalgamated in section 4 into a detailed analysis of the microscopic distribution pattern of short - cuts or wormholes and their consequences for the number of effective dof in a volume of space . we introduce a new type of dimension , the so - called holographic dimension . furthermore , we explain the microscopic basis of the holographic principle in general and the bulk - boundary correspondence between the dof in the interior of e.g. a bh and the dof on the boundary . some apparent counter examples concerning the area - scaling property ( see e.g. @xcite ; wheeler s bag of gold-spacetimes ) are very briefly addressed . in the last section we briefly comment on a number of immediate applications of our microscopic holographic approach and ( open ) problems which can be settled with the help of our framework . a characteristic feature of the dynamical network models we investigated is their undulatory character . as a consequence of the feedback structure of the coupling between node ( cell ) states and wiring diagram of edges ( i.e. the pattern of momentary elementary connections or interactions ) the network never settles in a static , frozen final state . the network may of course end up in some attracting subset of phase space but typical are wild fluctuations on a small ( microscopic ) scale with possibly some macroscopic patterns emerging on a coarser scale forming some kind of superstructure ( see e.g. @xcite ) . it is in our view not sufficiently appreciated that , in contrast to most of the other systems being studied in physics , the quantum vacuum is in a state of eternal unrest on a microscopic scale , with , for all we know , short - lived excitations constantly popping up and being reabsorbed by the seething sea . it therefore seems reasonable to regard our above network model ( investigated in e.g. @xcite to @xcite ) as a ( toy ) model of the quantum vacuum with the energy - momentum fluctuations on short scales being associated with the fluctuations of the local node and edge states . in the following we adopt the working hypothesis of a parallelism of network behavior and microscopic behavior of the quantum vacuum . we now come to a detailed analysis of the microscopic pattern of vacuum fluctuations . in sect.4 of @xcite we made a calculation which shows that , given the huge number of roughly planck - size grains in a macroscopic piece of space and assuming that the individual grains are allowed to fluctuate almost independently , more precisely , some grain variable like e.g. the local energy , the total fluctuations in a macroscopic or mesoscopic piece of space of typical physical quantities are still so large ( i.e. macroscopic ) that they should be observable . note that with the number of nodes of roughly planck - size , @xmath0 , in a macroscopic volume , @xmath1 , being gigantic , its square root is still very large ( for the details of the argument see @xcite ) . more precisely , with @xmath2 some physical quantity belonging to a microscopic grain ( e.g. energy , momentum , some charge etc . and taking for convenience @xmath3=0 ) and @xmath4 being the observable belonging to the volume @xmath1 , the fluctuation of the latter behaves under the above assumption as @xmath5 with @xmath6 the number of grains in @xmath1 . this is a consequence of the central limit theorem . as such large integrated fluctuations in a macroscopic region of the physical vacuum are not observed ( they are in fact microscopic on macroscopic scales ) , we conclude : the individual grains or supposed elementary dof do not fluctuate approximately independently . remark : we note that this fact is also corroborated by other , independent observations . we can refine the result further ( cf . @xcite ) by assuming that the fluctuations in the individual grains are in fact not independent but correlated over a certain distance or , more precisely , are short - range correlated . in mathematical form this is expressed as integrable correlations . this allows that `` positive '' and `` negative '' deviations from the mean value can compensate each other more effectively . letting e.g. @xmath7 be the density of a certain physical observable and @xmath8 the integral over @xmath1 . in order that @xmath9 we proved in @xcite that it is necessary that @xmath10 we made a more detailed analysis in @xcite under what physical conditions property ( [ fluc ] ) can be achieved , arriving at the result : nearly vanishing fluctuations in a macroscopic volume , @xmath1 , together with short - range correlations imply that the fluctuations in the individual grains are anticorrelated in a fine - tuned and non - trivial way , i.e. positive and negative fluctuations strongly compensate each other which technically is expressed by property ( [ fluc ] ) . remark : in @xcite we extended such a vacuum fluctuation analysis and applied it to measurement instruments , being designed to detect ( possibly ) microscopic fluctuations of distances due to passing gravitational waves . we hence infer that the fluctuation pattern of e.g. energy - momentum has to be strongly anticorrelated . but under the above assumption it is possible that the underlying compensation mechanism which balances e.g. the positive and negative energy fluctuations is of short - range type , viz . , individual grain - energies may still fluctuate almost independently if their spatial distance is sufficiently large . we show in the following that the true significance of the so - called holographic principle is it , to enforce a very rigid and long - ranged anticorrelated fluctuation pattern in the quantum vacuum . as we are at the moment only interested in matters of principle , we assume the simplest case to prevail , called the space - like holographic principle ( holding in contexts like e.g. quasi - static backgrounds or asymptotic minkowski - space ; see e.g. the beautiful review @xcite ) . there exists a class of scenarios in which the maximal amount of information or entropy which can be stored in a spherical volume is proportional to the area of the bounding surface . the same holds then for the number of available dof in @xmath1 . this is the spacelike holographic principle . in a series of papers brustein et al . developed a point of view that relates typical fluctuation results of quantum mechanical observables in quantum field theory with the area - law - like behavior of entanglement entropy and bh - entropy ( cf . e.g. @xcite ) . we already made a brief remark to this approach in @xcite . we note that we arrived at related results using different methods in another context ( see e.g. @xcite and @xcite ) . as a more detailed comment would lead us too far astray , we plan to discuss this subject matter elsewhere . what we are going to show in the following is that the mechanism leading to the strange area - behavior of the entropy of an enclosed volume , @xmath1 , is considerably subtler as usually envisaged . on the one hand , we will show that the number of elementary dof contained in @xmath1 is in principle proportional to the volume . on the other hand we infer from observations on the macroscopic or mesoscopic scale that the fluctuations of e.g. the energy are strongly anticorrelated . however , as long as this compensation mechanism is short - ranged , we would still have a number of nearly independently fluctuating clusters of elementary dof which again happens to be proportional to the volume as the cluster size is roughly equal to the correlation length . so the conclusion seems to be inescapable that the patterns of vacuum fluctuations must actually be long - range correlated on a microscopic scale . but we showed in @xcite or @xcite in quite some detail that even systems , displaying long - range correlations , will usually have an entropy which is proportional to the volume . a typical example is a ( quantum ) crystal ( @xcite,@xcite ) . it is certainly correct that below a phase transition point a system of particles in the crystal phase has a smaller entropy than in the liquid or gas phase , but still the entropy happens to be an extensive quantity . the reason is in our view that the system develops , as a result of the long - range correlations , new types of collective excitations ( e.g. lattice phonons ) which serve as new collective dof . approximately they may be treated as a gas of weakly interacting elementary modes with the usual extensive entropic behavior . that is , the holographic principle entails that the elementary dof have to be long - range anticorrelated ( cf . also the remarks in @xcite or sect.7 of @xcite ) . but we see that this is only a necessary but not a sufficient property for an entropy - area law to hold . we hence arrive at the preliminary conclusion : from our preceding arguments and observations we conclude that the holographic principle implies that the fluctuation patterns in @xmath1 are long - range anticorrelated in a fine - tuned way on a microscopic scale and are essentially fixed by the state of the fluctuations on the bounding surface . the dynamical mechanism , which generates these long - range correlations must however , by necessity , have quite unusual properties ( cf . subsection [ bulkboundary ] ) . before we derive the wormhole structure of the quantum vacuum on a primordial scale in the next sections , we continue with the general analysis of the pattern of vacuum fluctuations and derive some useful properties of it . a particular role is usually played by the energy and its fluctuations furthermore , vacuum fluctuations are frequently discussed together with the so - called zero - point energies . while they are not exactly the same , they are closely related . both occur also in connection with the cosmological constant problem ( to mention only a few sources see e.g. @xcite,@xcite,@xcite,@xcite,@xcite,@xcite,@xcite ) . in the simplest examples like e.g. the quantized harmonic oscillator or the electromagnetic field we have @xmath11 and with @xmath12 in the groundstate , @xmath13 , we have @xmath14 with @xmath15 which follows from @xmath16=-i\hbar$ ] . in the same way we have in ( matter - free ) qed : @xmath17 with @xmath18 so that again @xmath19 is a sum over pure vacuum fluctuations of the non - commuting quantities @xmath20 and @xmath21 . one should however note that in the quantum field context products of fields at the same space - time point have to be wick - ordered ( in order to be well - defined ) . it is , on the other hand , frequently argued that with gravity entering the stage , these eliminated zero - point energy fluctuations have to be taken into account again . in our view , this problem is not really settled . we now come to an important point . it is our impression that in some heuristic discussions ( vacuum fluctuations as virtual particle - antiparticle pairs ) the consequences of the fact that the vacuum state is an exact eigenstate of the hamiltonian in a hilbert space representation of some quantum field theory are not fully taken into account . i.e. , we have @xmath22 ( provided the ground state energy is for convenience normalized to zero ; note however that this may be problematical in a theory containing gravity ) . eigenstates , however , have the peculiar property that the standard deviation is necessarily zero , @xmath23 according to the standard interpretation of quantum theory combined with spectral theory , @xmath24 , this implies that in each individual observation process the total energy of the vacuum which is , according to conventional wisdom , the ( hypothetical ) sum or superposition of local ( small scale ) fluctuations , happens to be exactly zero . in other words , the elementary fluctuations have to exactly compensate each other in an apparently fine - tuned way . put differently if there are positive local energy fluctuations , there have to be at the same time by necessity negative energy fluctuations of exactly the same order . that is , at each moment , the global pattern of energy fluctuations in the quantum vacuum is an array of rigidly correlated positive and negative local excitations . remark : note the similarity of this independent observation to what we have said above in connection with the holographic hypothesis . + it should be mentioned that hawking in @xcite invoked exactly this picture of a particle pair excitation near the event horizon with the virtual particle , having negative energy , falling into the bh while the one with positive energy escapes to infinity . it would be useful to get more quantitative information on the spectral properties of the local observables , in particular estimates on negative fluctuations . one could try to make an explicit spectral resolution of these quantities , e.g. of the energy , contained in a finite volume , @xmath1 , but this turns out to be difficult in general , even if one has given an explicit model theory in some hilbert space . as we prefer a more general , model independent approach ( not necessarily based on hilbert space mathematics ) , we proceed by using ( similar to bell in his papers ) a general probabilistic approach which rather exploits the statistics of individual measurement results . unfortunately , we found that the standard estimates , known to us in this context ( e.g. the markov - chebyshev - inequality ) , always go in the wrong direction ( see e.g. @xcite or @xcite ) . therefore we present in the following our own estimate . the strategy is the following . we take an observable , @xmath25 , localized in @xmath1 with , for convenience , discrete spectral values , @xmath26 , and corresponding probabilities denoted by @xmath27 . if we assume that the expectation of @xmath25 is zero ( which can always be achieved by a simple shift ) we have @xmath28 furthermore , we assume its standard deviation in e.g. the vacuum , @xmath29 , to be finite ( which is automatically the case for bounded operators , but we want to include also more general statistical variables ) @xmath30 in a first step we make the simplifying assumption ( taking e.g. a bounded function of the energy ) @xmath31 we are interested in the amount of negative ( e.g. energy ) fluctuations we will observe in measurements . a reasonable quantitative measure of it is @xmath32 with @xmath33 the negative spectral values and their corresponding probabilities . we then have ( with @xmath34 ) @xmath35 for the lhs we have @xmath36 as the expectation of @xmath37 was assumed to be zero . this yields @xmath38 i.e. @xmath39 on the other hand ( cauchy - schwartz ) @xmath40 we hence arrive at the result if the observable , @xmath37 , is bounded , so that its spectral values fulfill @xmath41 , we have the estimate @xmath42 with @xmath43 the probabilities that the negative spectral values @xmath26 occur in an observation . that is , we manage to bound a quantity , which is difficult to measure directly , by quantities , which are usually more easily accessible . we can generalize this result to situations where the @xmath26 are not exactly bounded by some @xmath44 but are bounded in at least an essential way . we assume that there exists some @xmath44 so that @xmath45 we then have @xmath46 under the above assumption of an essentially bounded @xmath37 we have @xmath47 another , rigorous , but not quantitative , argument can be derived from axiomatic quantum field theory ( see e.g. @xcite ) . it follows from the so - called reeh - schlieder theorem that there are no local observables or fields which can annihilate the vacuum ( where by local we mean that the objects commute for space - like separation ) . i.e. , we have for any local @xmath48 ( with @xmath49 ) @xmath50 we take now as local observable the energy density integrated over a certain spatial region , @xmath1 , @xmath51 one usually normalizes @xmath52 to @xmath53 the classical expression of the energy density , being derived in lagrangian field theory , is positive . the corresponding quantized expression , after a necessary wick - ordering ( see e.g. @xcite or @xcite ) is however no longer positive definite as an operator ( density ) . this can be seen as follows . if the quantized energy density were still positive , one can take the square root ( via the spectral theorem ) of e.g. the positive operator @xmath54 and get : @xmath55 hence @xmath56 as @xmath57 is also a local observable this is a contradiction due to the reeh - schlieder theorem . @xmath54 is not a positive operator , hence its spectrum contains negative spectral values . it is then easy to construct hilbert - space vectors , @xmath58 , so that the measurement of @xmath54 in @xmath58 yields negative values for the local energy . remark : we recently learned that this argument is originally attributed to epstein ( unpublished;@xcite or see @xcite ) , while the derivation which can be found in @xcite is a completely different one . the important message ( in our view ) of all this is that , perhaps in contrast to naive expectation , the quantum vacuum contains a lot of negative energy excitations which globally exactly balance the positive excitations . one may now speculate about the possibility of making use of this observation . in this section we want to describe ( very ) briefly and sketchily the three different lines of reasoning which lead us to the concept of wormhole spaces . the first line originated from our investigation of the structure and dynamical behavior of the networks we described above . in e.g. @xcite we analyzed in some quantitative detail the unfolding of the network structure and the various network epochs under the inscribed microscopic dynamical laws and developed the two - level concept of the network structure ( or , rather , a multi - scale structure ) , which , under the right conditions , is relatively smooth on a sufficiently coarse - grained level ( level 2 ) with , among other things , a distant measure ( metric ) of the more ordinary type and ( hopefully ) an integer - valued geometric dimension , while on a more microscopic scale ( level 1 ) the network structure is expected to be very erratic with possibly a lot of links ( elementary interactions or information channels ) connecting regions which may be far apart with respect to the metric on level 2 . the association of these links with microscopic wormholes thus suggests itself ( cf . in particular observation 4.27 in @xcite ) . note furthermore that our network dynamics implies that these translocal connections are dynamically switched on or off . compare this observation with the point of view expounded in e.g. @xcite _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ but if a wormhole can fluctuate out of existence when its entrances are far apart then , by the principle of microscopic reversibility , the fluctuation into existence of a wormhole having widely separated entrances ought to occur equally readily . this means that every region of space must , through the quantum principle , be potentially `` close '' to every other region , something that is certainly not obvious from the operator field equations which , like their classical counterparts , are strictly local.it is difficult to imagine any way in which widely separated regions of space can be `` potentially close '' to each other unless space - time itself is embedded in a convoluted way in a higher - dimensional manifold . additionally , a dynamical agency in that higher - dimensional manifold must exist which can transmit a sense of that closeness . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ the quantitative network calculations in the mentioned papers have mainly been performed within the framework of random graphs . important mathematical tools for the network analysis in the transition from microscopic , strongly fluctuating and geometrically irregular scales to coarse - grained and , by the same token , smoother scales have been the concepts of cliques of nodes , the clique - graph of a graph and an important network parameter which we dubbed intrinsic scaling dimension ( we later learned , @xcite , that this concept plays also an important role in geometric group theory or cayley - graphs where it is called the growth degree ) . to give a better feeling what is actually implied , we give the definitions of clique , clique - graph and internal scaling dimension ( more about graph theory can e.g. be found in @xcite , @xcite , notions and properties of graph dimension were studied in e.g. @xcite ) . a simplex in a graph is a subset of vertices ( nodes ) with each pair of nodes in this subset being connected by an edge . in graph theory it is also called a complete subgraph . the maximal members in this class are called cliques . the clique graph , @xmath59 , of a graph , @xmath60 , is built in the following way . its set of nodes is given by the cliques of @xmath60 , an edge is drawn between too of its nodes if the respective cliques have a non - empty overlap with respect to their set of nodes . graphs carry a natural neighborhood structure and notion of distance . the neighborhood @xmath61 of a node @xmath62 is the set of nodes @xmath63 which can be reached , starting at @xmath62 in @xmath64 consecutive steps , i.e. there exists a path of @xmath64 consecutive edges connecting the nodes @xmath62 and @xmath63 . [ dist]the canonical network or graph metric is given by @xmath65 here @xmath66 is the number of consecutive edges of the path . the above definition fulfills all properties of a metric . thus graphs and networks are examples of metric spaces . [ dim ] let @xmath62 be an arbitrary node of @xmath60 . let @xmath67 denote the number of nodes in @xmath61.we consider the sequence of real numbers @xmath68 . we say @xmath69 is the _ lower _ and @xmath70 the _ upper internal scaling dimension _ of g starting from @xmath62 . if @xmath71 we say @xmath60 has internal scaling dimension @xmath72 starting from @xmath62 . finally , if @xmath73 @xmath74 , we simply say @xmath60 has _ internal scaling dimension @xmath75_. we proved in @xcite ( among other things ) that this quantity does not depend on the choice of the base point for most classes of graphs . it turns out that this geometric notion is a very effective characteristic of the large - scale structure of graphs and networks . this topic was further studied in greater generality in e.g. @xcite . in @xcite we developed what we called the geometric renormalization group , to extract important geometric coarse grained , that is , large scale information from the microscopically quite chaotically looking network and its dynamics . the idea is , at least in principle , similar to the block spin transformation in statistical mechanics . that is , certain characteristic properties of the system are distilled from the microscopically wildly fluctuating statistical system by means of a series of algorithmic renormalization steps ( i.e. coarse - graining plus purification ) . the central aim is it to arrive in the end at a system which resembles , on the surface , a classical space - time , or , on the other hand , to describe the criteria a network has to fulfill in order that it actually has such a classical fixed point . in the course of this analysis we observed ( cf . section viii of @xcite ) that the so - called critical network geometries , i.e. the microscopic network geometries which are expected to play a relevant role in the analysis , are necessarily in a very specific way geometrically non - local , put differently , they have to contain a very peculiar structure of non - local links , or short - cuts , that is , in other words , the kind of wormhole structure , we already described above . relations to non - commutative geometry were established and studied in @xcite . we mention in particular section 7.2 `` microscopic wormholes and wheeler s space - time foam '' and section 8 `` quantum entanglement and quantum non - locality '' . the possible relevance for quantum theory is in fact quite apparent ( as has also been emphasized in the papers by t hooft ) , as these microscopic wormholes may be the origin of the ubiquitous entanglement phenomena in quantum theory . the following figures describe pictorially the nested structure of the cliques of nodes in consecutive renormalization steps and overlapping cliques of nodes , defining the local near - order of physical points together with shortcuts which connect distant parts of the coarse - grained surface structure . a second complex of ( related ) phenomena emerges in the field of small world networks . this is a particular class of networks of apparently quite a universal character ( described and reviewed in some detail , for the first time , in @xcite ) with applications in many fields of modern science . they consist essentially of an ordinary local network with its own local notion of distance superimposed by a typically very sparse network of so - called short - cuts living on the same set of nodes and playing a structural role similar to the microscopic wormholes described above . a typical example ( with dimension of the underlying lattice @xmath76 ) is given in the following figure . some further ( in fact very few ) references , taken from quite diverse fields are e.g. @xcite,@xcite,@xcite . its , in our view , crucial characteristic is the existence of two metrics over the same network or graph . the first , @xmath77 , is defined ( cf . definition [ dist ] ) by taking into account the full set of edges ( i.e. , including the short - cuts ) and a second ( local ) metric , @xmath78 , taking into account only the edges of the underlying local network . it hence holds @xmath79 remark : the metric @xmath78 may then be associated ( after some renormalisation or coarse - graining steps ) with an ordinary macroscopic metric defined on a smooth space ( without wormholes ) like our classical space - time . @xmath77 , on the other hand , should be regarded as a microscopic distance concept which employs the existence of wormholes . while , on the surface , the origin of this concept of small world networks seems to be quite independent of the wormholes in general relativity , it is the more surprising that on a conceptual meta level various subtle ties do emerge . to mention only one ( in our view ) important observation . in @xcite it is for example shown , that a sparse network of shortcuts superimposed upon an underlying local network , has the propensity to stabilize the overall frequency pattern ( phase locking ) of so - called phase - oscillators which represent the nodes of the networks , the links representing the couplings . the oscillators are assumed to oscillate with ( to a certain degree ) independent frequencies . if we relate these local frequencies with some local notion of time ( or clocks ) , we may infer that ( microscopic ) wormholes create or stabilize some global notion of time ! we now come to the third strand , viz . the real wormholes of general relativity or quantum gravity . we mainly concentrate on the wormholes in true , i.e. lorentzian space - time . euclidean wormholes also ( may ) play an important role and have been discussed extensively in the context of the ( nearly ) vanishing value of the cosmological constant ( see e.g. @xcite,@xcite,@xcite , @xcite,@xcite,@xcite ) . of particular relevance in the lorentzian context are the so - called traversable wormholes . their study started ( as far as we know ) with two seminal papers by thorne and coworkers ( see @xcite ) . the geometric construction of such solutions is in fact not so difficult if performed by the so - called g - method . that is , one constructs a geometric wormhole , e.g. of the static type , and , in a second step , computes the energy - momentum tensor being consistent with this solution . giving a rough outline , this can be done in following way . two open balls are removed from two different pieces of e.g. approximately flat 3-space . their boundaries are glued together with the junction being smoothed . as a consequence of the smoothing process a tube emerges interpolating between the two spheres ( see e.g. @xcite ) . it is a remarkable fact that in this process the weak energy condition ( wec ) has to be violated , the latter implying that @xmath80 that is , the matter - energy density is positive in any reference system . put differently , in order to get a traversable wormhole , one has to violate the wec . the wec is always satisfied by classical matter . therefore quantum effects are needed . the kind of negative energy needed is also called exotic matter . we showed in quite some detail in the preceding section that the quantum vacuum abounds with negative energy fluctuations . therefore the speculation in section h of the first paper in @xcite does not seem to be too far - fetched . in a next step one can study networks of such traversable wormholes . in @xcite it is speculated that such a network , existing in the early universe , may solve the horizon problem . the same situation was discussed from the point of view of our network approach in section 4.1 ( the embryonic epoch ) of @xcite . all this comes already quite near the general picture we envoked in the beginning of this section . furthermore one can envisage solutions combining black and white holes . this corresponds to some of our networks where the orientation ( direction ) of the links connecting two nodes can change under the dynamics . a review of lorentzian wormholes can be found in the book by visser ( @xcite ) . some other references are e.g. @xcite and @xcite . the above picture of a hypothetical network of wormholes sitting in the deep structure of the quantum vacuum is beautifully complemented by an approach ( see e.g. @xcite,@xcite ) which investigates within a ( semi)classical approximation the energy of a quantum vacuum state containing such an array of wormholes ( or , rather , a gas of such wormholes ) and compare it with a vacuum state which in zeroth order is flat minkowski space . it comes out ( apparently being a kind of casimir effect ) that the quantum vacuum containing the wormhole gas has in this semiclassical approximation a lower energy compared to the state , being a perturbation of minkowski space . one should note however that this is a first order quantum effect ! anyhow , this observation seems to corroborate the space - time foam picture of e.g. wheeler and we conclude this section with from our analysis in this and the preceding section emerges a model of the ground state of some preliminary version of quantum gravity which contains as an essential ingredient a network of microscopic wormholes . these wormholes can be created and annihilated and are in our picture the carriers of information between distant parts of classical space - time . we call such a physical structure a wormhole space and regard our cellular or small world networks , discussed above , as models , encoding and representing the typical characteristics of such systems . the typical characteristic is the existence of two types of distance , a microscopic one and an ordinary local one , being similar to ordinary macroscopic metrics on smooth spaces . we learned in the preceding sections that two ( presumably crucial ) properties govern the behavior of the quantum vacuum on a microscopic scale . first , the vacuum fluctuations are strongly long - range anticorrelated on a microscopic scale , i.e. there exists a fine - tuned pattern of positive and negative ( energy ) fluctuations . second , a quantum mechanical stability analysis seems to show that the quantum vacuum is pervaded by a network of microscopic wormholes . we argued above that these two features are not independent phenomena but rather are the two sides of the same medal . furthermore , the presumed wormhole structure has been supported by observations coming from other fields of research like e.g. cellular or small - world networks . in this ( central ) section we will now combine these observations and show that they underlie ( among other things ) the holographic principle and the entropy - area law of bh - thermodynamics . in the following we will use ( for convenience ) the language of our networks with the nodes of the network representing microscopic grains of space ( or space - time ) of roughly planck - size . leaving out other details we treat our quantum vacuum as a wormhole space , i.e. as a ( small world ) network consisting of an ordinary local network structure being superimposed by a ( presumably ) sparse random network with edges consisting of short - cuts , i.e. links , connecting regions of space or space - time , which may be quite a distance apart with respect to the metric , belonging to the underlying local network these short - cuts represent the wormholes of ordinary space - time . the crucial characteristic , from which everything is expected to follow , is the pattern and distribution of these short - cuts being immersed in the underlying local network . that is , we randomly select a node @xmath62 in the network @xmath60 ( @xmath60 standing for graph ) and study the distribution of short - cuts connecting @xmath62 with nodes @xmath63 on spheres of radius @xmath81 around @xmath62 ( measured with respect to some macroscopic metric or the natural metric of the underlying local network ) . we expect that the precise distribution law will depend on the concrete type of space - time we are dealing with . this holds in particular if the space - time is not static . that is , our microscopic approach to holography makes it possible to understand how holography may depend on the concretely given type of space - time ( cf . e.g. the covariant entropy bound of bousso , @xcite ) . remark : we emphasize that the network or the quantum vacuum it is representing , is basically a statistical system with all local dof fluctuating . that means , most of our statements in the following are about mean values or averages over finer statistical details . one can arrive at the law , describing the distribution of short - cuts or wormholes around some arbitrary but fixed generic node ( viz . some fixed place in space - time ) in roughly two ways . one can e.g. motivate the distribution law by appealing to certain fundamental principles like e.g. scale - freeness or absence of a particular and in some sense unnatural length scale on a fundamental level . alternatively , one can show that a reasonable choice leads to far - reaching consequences and corroborates the findings and observations made on a more macroscopic level . to keep the discussion as briefly as possible we adopt in this section the second point of view . in the following we want to concentrate , for the sake of brevity , on a simple type of quantum vacuum , that is , the vacuum belonging to ordinary minkowski space or a space - time which is asymptotically flat ( e.g. a schwarzschild space - time ) . we postpone the analysis of more general space - times as they occur in general relativity . we make the following conjecture : on the average the number of short - cuts from a central node @xmath62 to nodes @xmath63 , sitting on the sphere , @xmath82 about @xmath62 is independent of @xmath81 . denoting this number by @xmath83 , we hence have @xmath84 remark : as this number is a statistical average , it need not be an integer . + the situation is depicted in the following picture . [ bb ] we will show in subsection [ bulkboundary ] in a detailed quantitative analysis that this result approximately holds as well for nodes , not sitting exactly in the center of the spheres @xmath85 ( see the following picture ) . we denote the cluster of nodes in the ball @xmath86 being connected to an @xmath62 by short - cuts by @xmath87 . we previously introduced the internal scaling dimension of a network ( see definition [ dim ] ) . it roughly describes how fast the network is growing with respect to some base node . as this growth degree is to a large degree independent of the base node ( see e.g. @xcite ) it is a global characteristic of a given network , in fact of a whole class of similar networks ( @xcite ) . it is well known that the generalization of the concept of dimension away from smooth geometric structures is not unique . the above type of dimension has the tendency to grow if additional short - cuts are inserted into a given network geometry . we now introduce another dimensional concept which catches other important network properties being more closely related to the phenomena we want to analyze in this paper . it uses in an essential way the two metrics , @xmath88 , introduced above . from the above we infer that the number of nodes in the cluster @xmath87 is approximately equal to @xmath89 . furthermore , if the network of short - cuts is very sparse , the clusters @xmath90 with @xmath91 are essentially disjoint ( the overlap is empty or very small ) . this is the phenomenon called _ spreading _ in the theory of random graphs . hence , the following concept is reasonable . we define a holographic dimension , @xmath92 , of a network in the following way . we take some ball @xmath86 with macroscopic radius @xmath81 around some fixed but arbitrary node @xmath62 with respect to the local metric @xmath93 . we then form the @xmath94-neighborhoods around the nodes @xmath95 with respect to the microscopic metric @xmath96 . we construct a minimal cover of @xmath86 by such @xmath97 , i.e. a minimal selection of such @xmath98 s.t . @xmath99 the cardinality of such a minimal set we denote by @xmath100 . we take the limit @xmath81 large or @xmath101 ( in an infinite network ) and define we call @xmath102 the holographic dimension of the graph ( network ) , provided the limit exists . in the more general situation we can , as in definition [ dim ] , define upper and lower dimensions etc . as for the previously defined graph dimension , the limit is independent of the selected base point , @xmath62 , if the network or graph is homogeneous on the average or in the large . due to the sparseness of the embedded subgraph of short - cuts , which yields the spreading property mentioned above , the number @xmath100 scales for the wormhole spaces or small - world networks as @xmath103 with @xmath104 the dimension of the local network or its coarse - grained continuum limit space . proof : the @xmath94-neighborhoods consist of nodes lying in the neighborhoods with respect to the local metric , @xmath93 , @xmath105 , plus the vertices connected by short - cuts with @xmath63 . the cardinality of @xmath105 is independent of @xmath81 and typically ( at least in our models ) a small number . for @xmath101 @xmath106 will therefore consist mainly of nodes connected to @xmath63 by short - cuts . sparseness of the short - cut graph and spreading yield the result . @xmath107 for the type of wormhole spaces or small - world networks , defined above , we then have @xmath108 that is , in this case we have the important result @xmath109 we now come to the holographic principle and the bh - entropy area law . as already mentioned , we discuss in this paper only the example of 4-dim . asymptotically flat ( minkowski ) space - time . in planck units a macroscopic ball , @xmath86 , contains approximately @xmath110 dof or grains of planck size . the typical cluster size is @xmath111 due to the mentioned spreading property the number of ( effectively ) independent cluster in the above minimal cover is approximately @xmath112 with @xmath113 denoting the area of @xmath85 . the number of effectively independent clusters , @xmath114 in @xmath86 is @xmath115 with the typical cluster size @xmath111 to show now that the number of effective dof in a generic volume ( where by generic we mean a region in space with the diameter in all directions being roughly of the same order ) is proportional to the surface area , @xmath116 , of its boundary , we employ a general observation , made e.g. in statistical mechanics . an important tool for the analysis of systems in statistical mechanics are correlation functions . correlations decay usually for large separation of the respective dof , but what is on the other hand certainly the case is , that nearest neighbors are strongly correlated ( near order versus far order ) . we expect that the dof in each of the @xmath117 are strongly correlated . we hence take it for granted , that they act effectively as a single collective dof . remark : it may be possible , that this near order in the immediate neighborhood of the grains can be finally destroyed by the insertion of a huge amount of localized energy , but this does not seem possible with present means . due to the existence of wormholes or short - cuts , distributed in space - time , the number of effective dof ( affiliated with the respective clusters @xmath114 ) in e.g. a ball @xmath86 equals @xmath100 , that is @xmath118 this is the area - law behavior of entropy or number of dof in a volume of space found in e.g. bh - entropy . we note however , that this law , in our formulation , is essentially a statement about the collective behavior of the elementary dof in ( the interior of ) a volume of space . i.e. , the respective dof are not really sitting on the boundary of @xmath1 . as to the details of the bulk - boundary correspondence see the following subsection . if we adopt the entropy - area law of bh - thermodynamics , which is , expressed in planck units , @xmath119 we have the possibility to fix our parameter @xmath120 , which gives the number of wormholes connecting a central grain of space with the grains on a surrounding sphere @xmath85 for any @xmath81 . however , entropy is not exactly identical to number of dof . to relate the two , we have to make a simple model assumption . one frequently makes the assumption of boolean dof , i.e. the dof on an elementary scale are two - valued . with this assumption we have the relation @xmath121 with @xmath122 the entropy , @xmath123 the number of dof . with the help of this identification we get @xmath124 which can in qualitative arguments be approximated by one ! that is , in planck units , there exists roughly one short - cut between a central vertex and a surrounding sphere of radius @xmath81 . this shows that on an extremely microscopic scale , the network of short - cuts is indeed very sparse . however the picture changes considerably if we go over to more accessible length scales . if we use , for example an atomic length - scale of e.g. @xmath125 , we have approximately @xmath126 grains of planck - size in a volume element of diameter @xmath127 . if we then choose , instead of a sphere @xmath85 , a spherical shell of radius @xmath81 and thickness @xmath127 we have approximately the number of wormholes or short - cuts between a central volume element of size @xmath128 and a corresponding spherical shell of radius @xmath81 is approximately @xmath129 which is quite a large number . if we choose for example @xmath130 , we see that roughly @xmath131 grains in the shell are the endpoints of about @xmath132 short - cuts coming from the central volume element of size @xmath128 . if we replace @xmath81 by the approximate diameter of the universe , i.e. @xmath133 ly , we get ( with @xmath134 ) : @xmath135 and for the number of planck - size grains in a spherical shell of this radius : @xmath136 with still @xmath132 short - cuts ending there . that is , only one in @xmath137 grains is the endpoint of a respective short - cut . but if we select a volume element of size @xmath128 in this shell , we have still the number of wormholes ( short - cuts ) between two volume elements of size @xmath128 being a distance @xmath138 apart , is still the large number @xmath139 that is , even over such a large distance there exist still a substantial number of wormholes connecting the two volume elements . but nevertheless , the network is sparse , viewed at planck - scale resolution . we now come to the last point of this section . from what we have learned above , it is intuitively clear , that the dof sitting on the boundary @xmath85 of e.g. a ball @xmath86 should fix ( or slave ) the dof in the interior . but we note that in order that this can hold , we have to verify our statement made in observation [ bb ] . furthermore , it is of tantamount importance to understand in more quantitative detail the influence of different shapes of the region under discussion and the effect of different space - time geometries . the prerequisites for this enterprise will be derived in the following . as an example we employ , as we already did above , the simple geometry of the spacelike holographic bound . for reasons of simplicity we place the center of the ball in the origin , i.e. @xmath140 . it is of great help if we can transform the problem into a problem of ordinary continuous analysis . to this end we introduce the probability that a node in the interior of @xmath86 and an arbitrary node on the boundary @xmath85 are connected by a short - cut . with @xmath141 and @xmath142 there spatial euclidean distance in three dimensions is @xmath143 the edge probability is given by @xmath144 here @xmath145 is the number of nodes ( or planck - scale grains ) on the sphere around @xmath146 with radius @xmath147.this follows directly from what we have learned in the previous sections . what we are actually doing in the following is the calculation of the average number of short - cuts between an arbitrary node @xmath146 in the interior of @xmath86 and the nodes on the boundary @xmath85 . this will be done within the framework of random graphs . the above @xmath148 is the so - called edge probability ( for the technical details see @xcite or @xcite,@xcite ) . the sample space is the space of graphs with node set comprising the node in @xmath146 and all the nodes sitting on the boundary @xmath85 and edge set all possible different sets of short - cuts connecting @xmath62 with the nodes on @xmath85 . the probability of each graph in the sample space is calculated with the help of the above elementary edge probability @xmath148 and its dual @xmath149 . we choose @xmath146 arbitrary but fixed in @xmath150 and let @xmath151 vary over the sphere @xmath152 . the integral over @xmath152 will then give the mean number of short - cuts between @xmath146 and the grains on @xmath152 . the guiding idea is that the dof in the interior are fixed by the dof on the boundary if this integral is essentially @xmath153 , as according to our philosophy , developed previously , in that case every node in the interior has on average at least one partner on the boundary as nearest neighbor with respect to the microscopic metric @xmath96 . to make the integration easier we choose , without loss of generality , @xmath154 with @xmath155 . a straightforward calculation ( using polar coordinates and appropriate variable transformations ) yields for the average number of short - cuts , @xmath156 , @xmath157 note that the integrand @xmath158 is always positive . furthermore , our choice of a coulomb - like law ( in three dimensions ) for the distribution of short - cuts in the previous subsection , i.e. @xmath159 , makes the above integral independent of @xmath81 . we can find a closed expression for the definite integral , i.e. @xmath160 note that the position of the point @xmath146 relative to the center and the boundary can be regulated by the value of the parameter @xmath161 . we have tabulated the integral for @xmath162 from @xmath163 to @xmath164 in the following table . + [ cols="<,<,<,<,<,<,<,<,<,<,<",options="header " , ] + we see that the number of short - cuts is almost constant through the whole interior of @xmath86 apart from a thin shell near the boundary . but this is not really surprising because there the main contribution comes from the near side of the boundary and is no longer of a true short - cut character . taking into account the additional prefactor , @xmath165 , in front of the integral which is @xmath166 we have the number of short - cuts from an arbitrary node @xmath146 in @xmath86 to the boundary @xmath85 is approximately @xmath167 for most of the nodes . furthermore for our coulomb - like distribution law it is independent of the radius of the sphere and is therefore consistent with the expected holographic behavior for this geometry . it is instructive to evaluate the above formula for @xmath168 , i.e. , the influence via short - cuts of the sphere @xmath85 on a dof in the exterior of @xmath85 . for @xmath162 large , the integral is dominated by the first term in the integrand , viz . for @xmath162 large we have @xmath169 for nodes , @xmath62 , lying outside of @xmath85 , the effect of the short - cut connections between @xmath62 and @xmath85 decays like a coulomb - law . that is , the dof in the exterior are no longer fixed by the dof on @xmath85 . what remains instead is a statistical influence in form of a correlation which decays with increasing distance . by the same token , there can not be an entropy - area law for the exterior of the sphere relative to its internal boundary . anyhow , this example does not really contradict the correctness of the spatial holographic principle as being presented in this paper . it would be interesting to relate our findings to the covariant holographic principle of e.g. bousso , @xcite this simple observation has an important consequence for arguments being sometimes invoked against the general nature of the spatial holographic principle ( cf . e.g. @xcite ) . while we do not intend to discuss the holographic principle for more general space - times in this paper , we mention one counter - example which one finds frequently in the literature , i.e. a universe containing a closed spatial slice , @xmath122 with a small inner subregion , @xmath170 ( see the following picture ) . the area - law in the usual form applies for the subregion @xmath170 relative to its boundary . however , according to our ( microscopic ) version of spatial holography , the dof on the inner boundary can not slave the dof in the large region @xmath171 if the inner boundary becomes too small . they only establish some kind of correlation in the exterior . the quantitative details are given by integrating our coulomb - like influence law over the inner surface . another , related , class of interesting ( but perhaps pathological ) apparent counter examples ( which we plan to address in greater detail elsewhere ) is discussed in e.g. @xcite , i.e. spacetimes which are called by marolf bag - of - gold spacetimes. an essential ingredient is some frw - spacetime hidden in the interior of a region which resembles an ordinary bh . the innner frw - universe has of course an entropy which is proportional to its volume while from the outside the whole configuration looks like a bh . this seeming contradiction can be easily understood with the help of our microsopic holographic law as the frw - spacetime is actually only weakly coupled with the exterior of the bh via wormholes . the technical arguments are the same as above . in the preceding sections we developed only the groundwork of our approach . to keep the paper within reasonable size , we had to postpone a more detailed discussion of the many consequences and immediate applications . in this final section we at least undertake to briefly comment on a number of important points . it is however obvious that a more detailed discussion of each point would require a paper of its own . + i ) the possible connections to the ubiquituous phenomenon of entanglement in ordinary quantum theory are obvious . interesting in this respect is e.g. the well - known tension in quantum theory between the locality and causality principle of special relativity and the instantaneous state reduction , accompanying the measurement process ( cf . the respective sections in e.g. @xcite ) . we think , similar to e.g. t hooft , that ( the microscopic form of ) holography ( we developed in this paper ) is the common basis which may unite quantum theory and gravitation . + ii ) the consequences of the bh - entropy being maximal , which is quite uncharacteristic for the ground state entanglement entropy in say ordinary quantum theory , should be further analysed . + iii ) the ads - cft - correspondence is regarded in string theory as the paradigm for bulk - boundary correspondence ( we mention only the review @xcite and the popular account @xcite ) . in it two , at first glance , fundamentally different theories are related to each other , the one living in the bulk , the other living on the boundary at infinity . we must however say that the concrete physical epistemology of this latter notion is not entirely clear to us . the use of boundaries at infinity is wide spread in holography and is mathematically well - defined , in particular for certain well - adapted coordinate systems being in use in hyperbolic geometry . but in general it is rather an asymptotic property and not a concrete place . note that in our approach full information about the interior of a ( spatial ) region is distributed essentially everywhere in the exterior of the region via wormholes , but usually not in the form of another field theory ! + iv ) a virulent problem ( the unitarity problem ) in bh - thermodynamics is the question whether a pure state goes over into a mixed state or not , that is , if the laws of ordinary quantum theory are possibly violated in bh - thermodynamics ( instead of the many published papers we mention only the reviews by wald , cited above ) . this is a quite intricate epistomological problem somewhat similar to the quantum measurement problem . we think , part of the problem is that frequently pure states and mixtures are regarded as complete opposites . but this is not really correct . it is here not the place to go into more details . but in some respect it lies rather in the eye of the beholder . that is , it is the problem of dealing with the complete microscopic information of a state , or rather with some coarse - grained form . note that in our approach microscopic information is widely scattered via short - cuts or wormholes over essentially the whole space . i.e. , it is not fully accessible to a local observer . we recommend the study of some older classics on the ergodic theorem in quantum statistical mechanics ( @xcite,@xcite,@xcite ) . + v ) our analysis should be extended to more general space - times where possibly different distribution laws may show up . a.d.sakharov : `` vacuum theory in curved space - time and the theory of gravitation '' , sov.phys.dok . 12(1968)1040 a.d.sakharov : `` spectral density of eigenvalues of the wave equation and vacuum polarization '' , theor.math.phys . 23(176)435 y.b.zeldovich : `` the cosmological constant and the theory of elementary particles '' , sov.phys.usp . 11(1968)381 t.jacobson : `` black - hole entropy and induced gravity '' , gr - qc/9404039 j.d.bekenstein : `` do we understand black - hole entropy ? '' , seventh marcel - grossmann meeting , stanford 1994 , gr - qc/9409015 j.d.bekenstein : `` black - holes and entropy '' , phys.rev . d7(1973)2333 j.d.bekenstein : `` statistical black - hole thermodynamics '' phys.rev . d12(1975)3077 s.w.hawking : `` black holes and thermodynamics '' , phys.rev . d13(1976)191 g.t hooft : `` the black - hole interpretation of string theory '' , nucl.phys . b335(1990)138 l.susskind,l.thorlacius,r.uglum : `` the stretched horizon and black - hole complementarity '' , phys.rev . d48(1993)3743 , hep - th/9306069 s.w.hawking : `` break down of predictability in gravitational collapse '' , phys.rev . d14(1976)2460 s.giddings : `` comments on information loss and remnants '' , phys.rev . d49(1994)4078 g.t hooft : `` on the quantum structure of a black - hole '' . b256(1985)727 r.sorkin : `` ten theses on black - hole entropy '' , in proc.eur.sci.found.conf . on philosphy and found.issues in stat.phys . , utrecht , nov.2003 , publ . spec.iss.of stud.hist.phil.mod.phys . 36(2005)291 , hep - th/0504037 r.sorkin : `` the statistical mechanics of black - hole thermodynamics '' , chandra symp . chicago dec.1996 , p.177 , ed . r.m .. wald , univ.chic.pr . 1998 ) t.jacobson,d.marolf,c.rovelli : `` black hole entropy : inside or out ? '' , int.journ.theor.phys . 44(2005)1807 , hep - th/0501103 l.bombelli,k.rabinder,k.kaul,j.lee,r.sorkin : `` quantum source of entropy for black - holes '' , phys.rev . d34(1986)373 m.srednicki : `` entropy and area '' , phys.rev.lett . 71(1993)666 m.requardt : `` entanglement - entropy for groundstates , low - lying and highly excited eigenstates of general ( lattice-)hamiltonians '' , hep - th/0605142 r.m.wald : `` the thermodynamics of black holes '' , liv.rev.relativ . 4(2001 ) , 6 [ online article ] r.m.wald : `` gravitation , thermodynamics , and quantum theory '' , cqg 16(1999)a177 , arxiv : gr - qc/9901033 r.m.wald : `` black holes and thermodynamics '' , symposium on black holes and relativistic stars , chicago , dec . 1996 , arxiv : gr - qc/9702022 a.strominger,c.vafa : `` microscopic origin of the bekenstein - hawking entropy '' , pl b 379(1996)99 , arxiv : hep - th/9601029 j.m.maldacena : `` black holes in strin theory '' , ph.d . thesis , hep - th/9607235 g.t.horowitz : `` the origin of black hole entropy in string theory '' , talk given at pacific conference of gravitation and cosmology , seoul , south korea , 1996 , arxiv : gr - qc/9604051 g.t.horowitz,j.polchinski : `` a correspondence principle for black holes and strings '' , pr d 55(1997)6189 , arxiv : hep - th/9612146 a.w.peet : `` tasi lectures on black holes in string theory '' , tasi 1999 , arxiv : hep - th 0008 s.d.mathur : `` the fuzzball proposal for black holes '' , fortschr.phys . 53(2005)793 , arxiv : hep - th/0502050 a.ashtekar,j.baez,a.goricki,k.krasnov : `` quantum geometry and black hole entropy '' , prl 80(1998)904 c.rovelli : `` loop quantum gravity and black hole physics '' , helv.phys.act . 69(1996)582 , arxiv : gr - qc/9608032 c.j.isham : `` structural issues in quantum gravity '' , lecture given at the gr14-conference , florence 1995 , arxiv : gr - qc/9510063 g.t hooft : `` how does god play dice ? , ( pre ) determinism at the planck scale '' , an essay in honor of john s. bell , arxiv : hep - th/0104219 g.t hooft : `` quantum gravity as a dissipative deterministic system '' , cqg 16(1999)3263 , arxiv : gr - qc/9903084 g.t hooft : `` quantum information and information loss in general relativity '' , lectture held at the 5th symposion on foundations of quantum mechanics , tokyo , japan , august 1995 , arxiv : gr - qc/9509050 g.t hooft : `` dimensional reduction in quantum gravity '' , essay dedicated to abdus salam , arxiv : gr - qc/9310026 m.requardt : `` ( quantum ) space - time as a statistical geometry of lumps in random networks '' , cqg 17(2000)2029 , arxiv : gr - qc/9912059 m.requardt : `` a geometric renormalisation group in discrete quantum space - time '' , journ.math.phys . 43(2002)351 , gr - qc/0110077 m.requardt : `` the continuum limit of discrete geometries '' , int.j.geom.meth.mod.phys . 3(2006)285 , math - ph/0507017 t.nowotny,m.requardt : `` emergent properties in structurally dynamic cellular automata '' , j.cell.aut . 2(2007)273 , cond - mat/0611427 m.requardt : `` planck fluctuations , measurement uncertainties and the holographic principle '' , mod.phys.lett.a 22(2007)791 , gr - qc/0505019 m.requardt : `` about the minimal resolution of space - time grains in experimental quantum gravity '' , arxiv:0807.3619 r.bousso : `` the holographic principle '' , rev.mod.phys . 74(2002)825 , hep - th/0203101 r.brustein,a.yarom : `` thermodynamics and area in minkowski space '' , p.r . d 69(2004)064013 , arxiv : hep - th/0311029 , r.brustein,a.yarom,d.h.oaknin : `` implications of area scaling of quantum fluctuations '' , p.r . d 70(2004)044043 , arxiv : hep - th/0310091 , r.brustein,a.yarom : `` area - scaling of quantum fluctuations '' , nucl.phys . b 709(2005)391 , arxiv : hep - th/0401081 , r.brustein,a.yarom : `` dimensional reduction from entanglement in minkowski space '' , jhep 0501:046 ( 2005 ) , arxiv : hep - th/0302186 m.requardt : `` symmetry conservation and integrals over local charge densities in quantum field theory '' , comm.math.phys . 50(1976)259 m.requardt : `` fluctuation operators and spontaneous symmetry breaking '' , j.math.phys . 43(2002)351 , arxiv : math - ph/0003012 l.susskind : `` the world as a hologram '' , journ.math.phys . 36(1995)6377 , hep - th/9409089 s.e.rugh,h.zinkernagel,t.y.cao : `` the casimir effect and the interpretation of the vacuum '' , stud.hist.phil.mod.phys . 30(1999)111 s.e.rugh,h.zinkernagel : `` the quantum vacuum and the cosmological constant problem '' , stud.hist.phil.mod.phys . 33(2002)663 w.nernst : `` ueber einen versuch , von quantenmechanischen betrachtungen zur annahme stetiger energieaenderungen zurueckzukehren '' , verh.deutsch.phys.ges . 18(1916)83 c.p.enz,a.thellung : `` nullpunktsenergie und anordnung nichtvertauschbarer faktoren i m hamiltonoperator '' , helv.phys.act . 33(1960)839 t.h.boyer : `` quantum zero - point energy and long - range forces '' , ann.phys . 56(1970)474 s.weinberg : `` the cosmological constant problem '' , rev.mod.phys . 61(1989)1 n.straumann : `` on the mystery of the cosmic vacuum energy density '' , eur.journ.phys . 20(1999)419 , astro - ph/0009386 s.w.hawking : `` particle creation by black holes '' , comm.math.phys . 43(1975)199 h.bauer : `` mass- und integrationstheorie '' , de gruyter , berlin 1990 w.feller : `` probability theory '' , wiley , n.y . 1957 r.f.streater,a.s.wightman : `` pct , spin & statistics and all that '' , benjamin , n.y . 1964 j.d.bjorken,s.d.drell : `` relativistic quantum fields '' , mcgraw - hill , n.y . 1965 c.itzykson,j.-b.zuber : `` quantum field theory '' , mcgraw - hill , n.y . 1985 h.reeh : private communication s.j.summers : `` yet more ado about nothing , the remarkable relativistic vacuum state '' , arxiv:0802.1854 h.epstein,v.glaser,a.jaffe : `` nonpositivity of the energy density in quantized field theories '' , nuov.cim . xxxvi ( 1965)1016 a.anderson,b.dewitt : `` does the topology of space fluctuate ? '' , found.phys . 16(1986)91 b.bollobas : `` modern graph theory '' , springer , n.y . 1998 , `` random graphs '' , cambr.univ.pr . , cambridge 2001 t.nowotny,m.requardt : `` dimension theory on graphs and networks '' , j.phys.a:math.gen . 31(1998)2447 , arxiv : hep - th/9707082 m.requardt : `` wormhole spaces , connes points speaking to each other , and the translocal structure of quantum theory '' , arxiv : hep - th/0205168 d.j.watts : `` small worlds , the dynamics of networks between order and randomness '' , princt.univ.pr . , princeton 1999 s.h.strogatz : `` sync : the emerging science of spontaneous order '' , penguin , n.y . 2003 m.s.granovetter : `` the structure of weak ties '' , sociol.th . 1(1983)203 a.lochmann,m.requardt : `` an analysis of the transition zone between the various scaling regimes in the small world model '' , j.stat.phys . 122(2006)255 , arxiv : cond - mat/0409710 e.niebuhr,h.g.schuster,d.m.kammen,c.koch : `` oscillator - phase coupling for different two - dimensional network connectivities '' , pr a44(1991)6895 s.w.hawking : `` wormholes in spacetime '' , pr d 37(1988)904 s.coleman : `` why there is nothing rahter than something '' , nucl.phys . b 310(1988)643 i.klebanov,l.susskind,t.banks : `` wormholes and the cosmological constant '' , nucl.phys . b 317(1989)665 j.preskill : `` wormholes in spacetime and the constants of nature '' , nucl.phys . b 323(1989)141 w.g.unruh : `` quantum coherence , wormholes and the cosmological constant '' , pr d 40(1989)1053 s.w.hawking : `` do wormholes fix the constants of nature '' , nucl.phys . b 335(1990)155 s.m.morris,k.s.thorne : `` wormholes in spacetime '' , am.j.phys . 56(1988)395 , s.m.morris,k.s.thorne,u.yurtsever : `` wormholes , time machines , and the weak energy condition '' , prl 61(1988)1446 s.v.krasnikov : `` toward a traversable wormhole '' , arxiv : gr - qc/0003092 d.hochberg,t.w.kephart : `` wormhole cosmology and the horizon problem '' , prl 70(1993)2665 m.visser : `` lorentzian wormholes '' , springer , berlin 1996 i.h.redmount,wai-mo suen : `` is quantum spacetime foam unstable ? '' , pr d 47(1993)r2163 , `` quantum dynamics of lorentzian spacetime foam '' , pr d 49(1994)5199 c.j.fewster,th.a.roman : `` on wormholes with arbitrarily small quantities of exotic matter '' , arxiv : gr - qc/0507013 g.preparata,s.rovelli,s.-s.xue : `` gas of wormholes : a possible ground state of quantum gravity '' , gen.rel.grav . 32(2000)1859 , arxiv : gr - qc/9806044 r.garattini : `` large n - wormhole approach to space - time foam '' , phys.lett . b 446(1999)135 , arxiv : hep - th/9811187 , `` space - time foam and vacuum energy '' , talk given at the spanish relativity meeting , mao , minorca , spain sept.2002 , arxiv : gr - qc/0212013 y.aharonov,d.rohrlich : `` quantum paradoxes '' , wiley , n.y . 2005 o.aharony,s.s.gubser,j.maldacena,h.oguri,y.oz : `` large n field theories , string theory and gravity '' , phys.rep . 323(2000)183 j.maldacena : `` the illusion of gravity '' , sci.am . nov . 2005 , 56 j.v.neumann . `` beweis des ergodensatzes und des h - theorems in der neuen mechanik '' , zeitschr.phys . 57(1929)30 w.pauli,m.fierz : `` ueber das h - theorem in der quanten mechanik '' , zeitschr.phys . 106(1937)572 n.g.vankampen : `` grundlagen der statistischen mechanik der irreversiblen prozesse '' , fortschr.phys . 4(1956)405 d.marolf : `` black holes , ads , and cfts '' , gen.rel.grav . 41:903,2009 , arxiv:0810.4886 ; s.d.h.hsu,d.reeb : `` unitarity and the hilbert space of quantum gravity '' , class.quant.grav . 25:235007,2008 , arxiv:0803.4212 Abstract:

Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.

Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered . Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video . Paper: the study of random combinatorial objects is an amazing success story , which grew from ad hoc problems and simple ideas to a flourishing field of its own , with many astonishing results , advanced tools and important applications ( see e.g. @xcite ) . since the early work of erds and collaborators , it has long been known that the `` typical '' objects often have an interesting and unexpected structure often worth exploring . some such random combinatorial objects such as various classes of random graphs are understood to a remarkable degree ( see e.g. @xcite ) , while others , such as random finite groups remain largely mysterious ( see e.g. @xcite ) . _ random integer partitions _ occupy the middle ground , with a large mix of known results and open problems ( cf . section [ final : remarks ] ) , and are a subject of this paper . _ partition theory _ is a classical subject introduced by euler nearly three hundred years ago , which has strong connections and applications to a variety of areas ranging from number theory to special functions , from group representation theory to probability and statistical physics . a _ partition _ of @xmath0 is an integer sequence @xmath1 , such that @xmath2 and @xmath3 . much of this paper is concerned with asymptotic analysis of various classes of partitions , some known and some new . let us begin by noting that already the number @xmath4 of integer partitions of @xmath0 is a notoriously difficult sequence ; it is not even known if it is equidistributed modulo @xmath5 . there are several specialized tools , however , which allow a detailed information about random partitions . first , the analytic tools by hardy ramanujan and rademacher give a precise asymptotics of @xmath4 , see e.g. @xcite . second , the _ boltzmann sampling _ , in this case invented earlier by fristedt @xcite , allows a uniform sampling of random partitions of @xmath0 with a high degree of independence between part sizes . this paper introduces a new combinatorial tool , which is best used in conjunction with these . our main emphasis will be not on enumeration of various classes of partitions , but on the limit shapes of random such partitions . it is a well known phenomenon that random combinatorial objects , e.g. random graphs , tend to have unusually interesting parameters , of interest in both theory and applications . when represented geometrically , these random objects illuminate the underlying 0/1 laws of their asymptotic behavior ; examples included various _ arctic circle _ shapes for domino tilings and perfect matchings ( see e.g. @xcite ) , and for alternating sign matrices ( see @xcite ) . note that there are many different notions of the _ limit shape _ , which differ depending on the context and the geometric representation . first , one needs to be careful in the choice of the _ scaling _ , by which combinatorial objects of different sizes are compared to each other . in this paper we use different scaling for different classes of partitions . second , there is more than one notion of convergence to the limit shape , some stronger than others . roughly speaking , they describe how close are the random objects to the limit shape . here we work with two different notions , convergence in expectation , which we refer to as the _ weak notion of the limit shape _ , and convergence in probability , which we refer to as the _ strong notion of the limit shape _ , which is implied by a stronger large deviation result as well as a local central limit theorem ( see below ) . as we mentioned earlier the main result of the paper is the computation of limit shapes for several well known classes ( _ ensembles _ ) of random partitions for which this was neither known nor even conjectured before . most our results are not obtainable by previously known techniques . we postpone the precise formulation of our results until the next subsection ; for now let us briefly survey the long history of ideas leading to this work . arguably , partition theory began with euler s work establishing equality for the number of partitions in different classes by means of algebraic manipulation of generating functions . the next crucial step was made by sylvester and his students which introduced _ partition bijections _ and used them to prove many results by euler and others . roughly speaking , a partition is represented as a _ young diagram _ and the squares are rearranged accordingly . we refer to @xcite for a detailed survey of this approach . the study of the number @xmath6 of partitions of @xmath0 with at most @xmath7 parts goes back to cayley , sylvester and macmahon . hardy and ramanujan obtained a remarkable asymptotic formula , further refined by others . the first result on limit shapes is the _ erds szekeres theorem _ , which can be formulated as follows : @xmath8 \. = \. \beta \sqrt{n}\ts \bigl(1+o(1)\bigr ) , \quad \text{where } \ \ e^{-\alpha c } + e^{-\beta c } \.= \.1 \ \ \ , \text{and } \ \ c = \frac{\pi}{\sqrt{6}}\ .. \ ] ] these results were strengthened and extended in a number of papers , see e.g. @xcite . there are two prominent types of partition classes considered in the literature , which are essentially conjugate to each other . the classes are defined by restrictions on parts @xmath9 , and those with restriction on the number of times @xmath10 part @xmath11 appear in the partition , with no restrictions relating parts to each other . for example , the set of partitions into odd numbers fits into the latter class , which corresponds to a restriction of the form @xmath12 for all @xmath11 even . sometimes this is less obvious , for example , for partitions into distinct parts , the restriction is that each part appears at most once , i.e. , @xmath13 , rather than the fact that they are distinct , i.e. , @xmath14 . there is an extensive body of research related to limit shapes of integer partitions for which the restrictions are solely placed on the multiplicities @xmath10 . in this paper we consider restrictions on part sizes , such as the _ convex partitions _ , which satisfy @xmath15 these are equinumerous with partitions into triangular parts @xmath16 , i.e. , @xmath12 whenever @xmath11 is not a triangular number , which have a well understood limit shape . the bijection between these two classes of partitions is also well known @xcite , and we demonstrate how to obtain one limit shape from the other . the idea of this paper is to use partition bijections to transfer the limit shape results from one class of partitions onto another . making this formal is rather subtle . in @xcite , the second author introduces a necessary formalism essentially allowing such transfer , with the aim of proving that there is no natural proof of the classical _ rogers ramanujan identities_. this paper continues this approach , but can be read independently of @xcite and other earlier work . @xmath17 to understand the notion of the limit shape , we start with a geometric interpretation of an integer partition . each integer partition can be visualized as a curve in the first quadrant of @xmath18 , with a height function determined by the part sizes ; see figure [ young : diagram ] . by simultaneously plotting all of the young diagrams of every integer partition of a very large fixed size @xmath0 , for each @xmath0 one observes empirically a curve which is close to most of the diagram functions , namely , @xmath19 normalizing the @xmath20- and @xmath21-axes by @xmath22 , a single curve emerges in the limit as @xmath23 . this curve is a law of large numbers for the joint distribution of part sizes in a random integer partition . our definition of a limit shape , made precise in [ diagram functions ] , is a limit _ in probability _ as @xmath23 , of appropriately scaled part sizes of a uniformly random integer partition of size @xmath0 . the main technique for finding and proving the form of the limit shape is via a probabilistic model . the joint distribution of part sizes in a random integer partition of size @xmath0 is approximated by a certain joint distribution of _ independent _ random variables , which produces a random integer partition of random size . a weak notion of a limit shape is the convergence in expectation of the joint distribution of the independent random variables . it is easy to calculate the limit shape in this setting , as the calculation simplifies to a riemann sum . we show in section [ sect prob ] that the weak notion of a limit shape agrees with the usual limit shape in the context of integer partitions . this is also known as the _ equivalence of ensembles_. we start with two pivotal results in the field of limit shapes of integer partitions : the classical limit shape , and the limit shape of partitions into distinct parts . there is a long and rather involved history involving limit shapes , which is confounded by the weak and strong notions of limit shapes ; see [ history ] for a more detailed account . we denote the limit shape of unrestricted integer partitions by @xmath24 . [ unrestricted : limit : shape ] let @xmath25 denote the limit shape of integer partitions . then : @xmath26 a similar result is true for the limit shape of integer partitions into distinct parts , which we denote by @xmath27 . let @xmath28 denote the limit shape of integer partitions into distinct parts . then : @xmath29 one can also place certain types of restrictions on the part sizes in an integer partition , and ask whether or not a limit shape exists . we assume the part sizes are restricted to a set @xmath30 , where @xmath31 for some @xmath32 and @xmath33 ( subject to other technical assumptions , see [ credit ] ) . then , analogously as before , most partitions of size @xmath0 are close to a certain curve , which satisfies @xmath34 and @xmath35 is a constant which makes the area under the curve equal to one . in this case , the scaling of the @xmath20-axis is by @xmath36 and the scaling of the @xmath21-axis is by @xmath37 . [ rb : theorem ] let @xmath38 denote the limit shape of integer partitions with part sizes restricted to @xmath39 , with @xmath31 for some @xmath32 and @xmath33 . denote by @xmath40 the derivative of @xmath21 with respect to @xmath20 . then : @xmath41 where @xmath35 is given by equation . a similar generalization holds for partitions into distinct parts from a set @xmath39 . an alternative parameterization is by andrews @xcite , who defined the restrictions on part sizes of an integer partition by a sequence @xmath42 , where the multiplicity of the parts of size@xmath43 is restricted to be strictly less than @xmath44 . for example , the set of unrestricted partitions corresponds to the sequence @xmath45 , and partitions into distinct parts corresponds to @xmath46 . when parts sizes are restricted to @xmath39 . , this corresponds to the sequence @xmath47 , @xmath48 , and @xmath49 for @xmath50 . there are , however , certain restrictions on integer partitions for which a limit shape does not exist . for example , if we consider the sequence @xmath51 , @xmath48 , and @xmath52 if @xmath53 is not a power of 2 , then there is exactly one integer partition for each @xmath0 ; namely , the base-2 representation of the number @xmath0 . for another example , let @xmath54 for @xmath55 , and @xmath56 for @xmath57 for some positive @xmath58 . this sequence corresponds to partitions of @xmath0 with largest part at most @xmath58 . for @xmath58 fixed , the number of such partitions only grows polynomially with @xmath0 , and there is no limit shape . in contrast , the case @xmath59 was handled by romik @xcite , as well as vershik and yakubovich @xcite , and the limit shape does indeed exist . there are other classes of partitions which can not be described by andrews s parameterization . in particular , for the example of convex partitions described above , it is not immediately clear whether or not a limit shape exists , or if it does , what is the proper scaling . nevertheless , we show in [ convex ] that indeed the limit shape of convex partitions exists and demonstrate how to compute it . the goal of this paper is to obtain new limit shapes for integer partitions with restrictions which do not fit into the usual framework described above . the form of the restrictions given by andrews is a subset of restrictions called _ multiplicative restrictions _ by vershik @xcite , owing to the form of the generating function as a product of terms ; it also refers to the fact that under the weak form of the limit shape , part sizes are treated as independent , and so probabilities factor according to part sizes . our first example is an application of the various geometric transformations defined in @xcite . let @xmath60 denote the set of partitions @xmath61 with consecutive parts @xmath62 for even part sizes @xmath63 , and @xmath64 for all odd part sizes @xmath63 , @xmath65 let @xmath66 denote the limit shape of @xmath60 , and let @xmath67 , and @xmath68 . then the limit shape satisfies @xmath69 let @xmath70 denote the set of partitions into distinct parts which are congruent to @xmath71 or @xmath5 modulo @xmath72 . we demonstrate in section [ lebesgue ] how to apply these transformations to obtain the limit shape of @xmath60 . moreover , once we have the limit shape , certain statistics immediately follow . [ number : of : parts : cor ] let @xmath73 denote the number of parts in a random partition of size @xmath0 in @xmath60 . we have @xmath74 where @xmath75 denotes convergence in probability . the durfee square of a partition @xmath76 is the number of @xmath77 such that @xmath78 . it is a well - known statistic which plays a fundamental role in some of the bijections exploited in this paper , and is also described as the largest square which can fit entirely inside the young diagram of an integer partition . [ durfee : square : cor ] let @xmath79 denote the size of the largest durfee square in a random partition of size @xmath0 in @xmath60 . @xmath80 denote the real valued solution to @xmath81 then we have : @xmath82 where @xmath75 denotes convergence in probability . there are , however , certain bijections which are not covered by pak s geometric transformation approach . recall the example of convex partitions , which are partitions which satisfy @xmath83 let @xmath84 denote the set of convex partitions of size @xmath0 . let @xmath85 denote the set of partitions of size @xmath0 with parts in the set @xmath86 , @xmath87 , with unrestricted multiplicities . [ andrews : convex ] we have @xmath88 for all @xmath89 . the limit shape of @xmath90 is a special case of theorem [ rb : theorem ] , using @xmath91 and @xmath92 . it is thus natural to ask if it is possible to obtain the limit shape of @xmath93 from the limit shape of @xmath90 . the answer is affirmative , as witnessed in section [ sect r ] , _ due to the form of the bijection_. in fact , corollary [ convex : corollary ] below is a special case of a much larger class of partition bijections which map limit shapes continuously , which we describe in [ transfer : theorems ] . [ convex : corollary ] let @xmath94 denote the limit shape of @xmath90 , and let @xmath95 denote the the limit shape of @xmath93 . then we have @xmath96 where @xmath97 is the compositional inverse of @xmath98 . romik s unpublished manuscript @xcite contains an example which uses a single geometric transformation to obtain the limit shape of the set of partitions whose parts differ by at least 2 . it is a specialization of pak s geometric transformations , and requires a further refinement , in that it maps partitions of size @xmath0 with exactly @xmath58 parts . let @xmath99 denote the set of partitions whose parts differ by at least 2 , and denote its limit shape by @xmath100 . for @xmath101 , let @xmath102 , @xmath103 , and @xmath104 , where @xmath105 , and @xmath35 is a normalizing constant . then , the limit shape satisfies @xmath106 the rest of the paper is organized as follows . we start with three motivating examples : partitions with no consecutive parts , self - conjugate partitions , and convex partitions . then we make precise all of the necessary notions of limit shapes , bijections , and asymptotic stability in section [ sect notation ] , and state the new limit shape theorems in section [ sect special cases ] . we then present several examples demonstrating the application of the theorems . in section [ sect r ] , we present a generalization of convex partitions . section [ sect odd ] presents various applications of the theorems to euler s classical odd - distinct bijection , including a generalization due to stanton . sections [ lebesgue ] and [ diff d ] demonstrate step - by - step how to apply pak s geometric transformations in two important cases . section [ sect further ] contains examples where the number of summands is restricted . section [ sect prob ] contains the formal probabilistic setting and proofs of the main lemmas , including a large deviation principle . section [ sect main ] contains the proof of the main results . finally , section [ sect remarks ] contains historical remarks , and section [ final : remarks ] is a collection of final remarks . we first consider romik s example , which demonstrates the utility of considering bijections between classes of partitions . [ romik : theorem ] let @xmath107 denote the set of partitions such that no parts differ by exactly 1 , and there are no parts of size 1 . let @xmath108 , and let @xmath109 denote the limit shape of @xmath107 . then we have @xmath110 the _ existence _ of the limit shape of @xmath107 in theorem [ romik : theorem ] follows by considering the set of partitions which are conjugate to those in @xmath107 . let @xmath111 denote the set of partitions of size @xmath0 such that no parts differ by exactly 1 , and there are no parts of size 1 . let @xmath112 denote the set of partitions of size @xmath0 such that no part has multiplicity 1 . the conjugation map gives a bijection between partitions @xmath113 and @xmath114 for each @xmath89 . the limit shape of @xmath99 , the set of partitions such that no part has multiplicity 1 , has a restriction which is multiplicative , and its form follows in a straightforward manner from theorem [ special unrestricted ] . let @xmath99 denote the set of partitions such that no part has multiplicity 1 . let @xmath108 . then : @xmath115 as was noted by romik @xcite , even though the limit shapes satisfy @xmath116 , @xmath117 , it is not straightforward to compute the explicit form of @xmath109 using algebraic techniques , even with a computer algebra system . a general approach of finding limit shapes via a class of continuous transformations was developed in @xcite , where many well - known partition bijections are presented as certain geometric transformations acting on young diagrams , which also act continuously on the corresponding limit shapes . an example where the limit shape is apparent in a weak sense , but lacks a rigorous argument , is the set of _ self - conjugate partitions _ @xmath118 , consisting of all partitions @xmath76 such that @xmath119 implies also @xmath120 . [ sylvester ] let @xmath118 denote the set of partitions which are self - conjugate . the limit shape of @xmath118 satisfies equation . one can reason heuristically that the limit shape of @xmath118 should coincide with the limit shape of unrestricted integer partitions , however , we are unaware of any simple , rigorous methods to do so . the first difficulty is that the number of self - conjugate partitions of size @xmath0 is of an exponentially smaller proportion than the number of unrestricted partitions of size @xmath0 . the second difficulty is that we lose the asymptotic independence between part sizes . there are several different ways to obtain a rigorous proof of theorem [ sylvester ] , starting with the following bijection . let @xmath111 denote the number of partitions of @xmath0 into odd , distinct parts . let @xmath121 denote the number of self - conjugate partitions of @xmath0 . we have @xmath122 for all @xmath89 . one construction of the bijection is to break the principle hooks ( see ( * ? ? ? * figure 13 ) ) and stretch them out . when the partition @xmath76 is self - conjugate , each of the principle hooks must necessarily consist of an odd number of squares , and each principle hook consists of at least two squares more than the previous principle hook . in this instance , we have an explicit formula for the map which sends partitions @xmath119 to partitions @xmath61 into distinct , odd parts , namely , @xmath123 where @xmath124 is the size of the largest durfee square in the partition @xmath76 . a formal procedure to obtain theorem [ sylvester ] from this bijection is as follows , see ( * ? ? ? * section 7 ) . for the remainder of this section , @xmath125 . let @xmath126 denote the limit shape of partitions into odd , distinct parts , which is given by theorem [ rb : theorem ] using @xmath127 and @xmath128 . we shall need the explicit form of the limit shape in the calculations that follow , which is given by @xmath129 recall also that the limit shape of unrestricted integer partitions is given by the explicit formula @xmath130 denote by @xmath131 the limit shape of self conjugate partitions , which exists by ( * ? ? ? 7.1 ) . after an appropriate scaling by @xmath22 , by equation we have @xmath132 by rearranging and solving for @xmath133 , we obtain @xmath134 for @xmath135 . the value @xmath136 is precisely the value for which @xmath137 , @xmath138 , which cuts the limit shape in half via the line @xmath139 . thus , for @xmath140 , we can invoke the symmetry of self conjugate partitions about the line @xmath139 and conclude that @xmath141 for all @xmath138 . this solution is uncharacteristically simple , and most bijections are not as obliging as to allow for elementary algebraic manipulations of their part sizes . fortunately , this bijection can also be defined by a natural geometric bijection , and we next demonstrate each step in the process of mapping the limit shape from one set of partitions to another . figure [ parallel : mapping : young ] demonstrates how a geometric bijection from @xcite acts on the young diagrams , and figure [ parallel : mapping : limit ] demonstrates how a geometric bijection acts on the limit shapes . 0.3 @xmath142 \mbox{\begin{tabular}{c}\includegraphics[scale=0.282]{phi1.pdf } \\ \mbox{\large $ \phi(t)$ } \end{tabular } } \ar[dr ] & \\ \ar[d]\mbox{\begin{tabular}{c}\includegraphics[scale=0.282]{phi2b.pdf}\\\mbox{\large $ p\phi(t)$ } \end{tabular } } & & \mbox{\begin{tabular}{c}\includegraphics[scale=0.282]{phi2a.pdf}\\\mbox{\large $ q\phi(t)$}\end{tabular } } \ar[d ] \\ \ar[ddr]\mbox{\begin{tabular}{c } \mbox{\large $ p\phi(t)-t$ } \\ \includegraphics[scale=0.282]{phi3b.pdf}\\ \mbox{\large $ \phi_1(t)$}\end{tabular } } & & \mbox{\begin{tabular}{c } \mbox{\large $ \left((q\phi(t))^{\langle -1\rangle } - t\right)^{\langle -1\rangle}$ } \\ \includegraphics[scale=0.282]{phi3a.pdf } \\ \mbox{\large $ \phi_2(t)$ } \end{tabular } } \ar[ddl ] \\ & \mbox{\large $ \phi_1(t ) + \phi_2(t)$ } & \\ & \mbox{$\begin{array}{c } \includegraphics[scale=0.282]{phi4.pdf } \\ \mbox{\large $ \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\psi\left(\frac{t}{\sqrt{2}}\right)$ } \end{array}$ } & } } \ ] ] .9 in 0.3 @xmath143 \mbox{\begin{tabular}{c}\ydiagram[*(red ) ] { 1 + 0,2 + 0,2 + 0,2 + 0,2 + 1,1 + 5,0 + 7 } * [ * ( blue)]{1,2,2,2,2,2,1 } \\ \\ \mbox{\huge cut } \end{tabular } } \ar[dr ] & \\ \ydiagram[*(blue)]{1,2,2,2,2,1 } \ar[ddd]|-{\mbox{\huge shift } } & & \ydiagram[*(red)]{2 + 1,1 + 5,7 } \ar[ddd]|-{\mbox{\huge shift } } \\ \\ \\ \ydiagram[*(blue)]{1,1,2,2,2,2 } \ar[ddddd ] & & \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ydiagram[*(red)]{1,5,7}\ar[dddd]|-{\mbox{\huge transpose } } \hskip .85 in \\ \\ \\ \\ & & \ydiagram[*(red)]{1,1,2,2,2,2,3 } \ar@*{[thicker]}[dll ] \\ \mbox{\begin{tabular}{cc } \ydiagram[*(red ) ] { 0 + 1,0 + 1,0 + 1,0 + 1,0 + 2,0 + 2,0 + 2,1 + 1,1 + 1,2 + 0,2 + 0,2 + 0,2 + 1 } * [ * ( blue)]{0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,1,2,2,2,2 } & \mbox{\huge add } \end{tabular } } & & } } \ ] ] we summarize the steps of figure [ parallel : mapping : limit ] by the following set of mappings : @xmath144 the first map splits the curve into two curves of the same shape but scaled to half the original area . the next map shifts the coordinates up so that the functions evaluated at the point @xmath145 are equal to @xmath146 . the third map reflects the first coordinate about the line @xmath139 , so that the curves now lie in complementary regions in the first quadrant . finally , the last map pastes together the functions at @xmath147 the mappings defined above are presented in a way which emphasizes how the height functions are transformed with respect to the axes , whereas they are actually transforming regions in the plane . from a technical point of view , the mappings should be considered as transformations on the plane , as they are presented in @xcite , but for the purpose of finding explicit formulas for limit shapes , one can very often more simply track how the mappings transform the height functions and their inverses directly . our last example of this section exemplifies another class of bijections , those which can be realized as a linear transformation of multiplicities of part sizes . consider the set @xmath148 of all _ convex _ partitions , i.e. , partitions whose parts @xmath149 also satisfy the convexity condition : @xmath150 . this set of partitions does not exclude any particular set of sizes , nor does there appear to be any simple , a priori transformation , e.g. , conjugation , to such a set . nevertheless , we find the limit shape of convex partitions . [ conj convex ] let @xmath95 denote the limit shape of convex partitions @xmath148 . then : @xmath151 computing this limit shape requires several steps . first , recall andrews s theorem [ andrews : convex ] , that there is a bijection between partitions into parts of sizes @xmath86 , @xmath152 and convex partitions . simply knowing a bijection exists is not sufficient , however , and it is in fact the particular form of this bijection which allows us to find the limit shape . recall @xmath90 denotes the set of partitions into parts with sizes in @xmath39 , with @xmath153 . let @xmath154 denote the number of parts of size @xmath155 in a partition @xmath156 , @xmath152 . the following map @xmath157 was defined in @xcite . @xmath158 map @xmath159 is a bijection between @xmath160 and @xmath161 for each @xmath89 . each @xmath162 , with @xmath163 parts of size @xmath164 , corresponds to a @xmath165 with part sizes given by @xmath166 we can immediately write the weak form of the limit shape by appealing to riemann sums . in this case , the number of parts of size @xmath11 , @xmath48 , is generated from independent geometric random variables @xmath167 with parameter @xmath168 , where @xmath169 . the constant @xmath35 is given by equation with @xmath170 , @xmath92 , and @xmath171 . in this case , however , we set @xmath172 if @xmath173 . it will also be apparent in the calculation below that we need two different , but complementary , scaling functions . we have : @xmath174 & \ , = \ , \frac{\b}{n}\ , \sum_{j \ts\geq\ts \b \ts x } \. ( j - x\,\b+1)\ , \e\left[z_{\binom{j+1}{2}}\right ] \\ & \ , = \ , \frac{\b}{n}\ , \sum_{j \ts\geq\ts \b \ts x } \ , \bigl(j - x\,\b+1\bigr ) \ , \frac{\exp\left(-c\ , \frac{\binom{j+1}{2}}{\a}\right)}{1-\exp\left(-c\ , \frac{\binom{j+1}{2}}{\a}\right)}\ .. \end{aligned}\ ] ] we let @xmath175 satisfy @xmath176 . hence , @xmath177 , @xmath178 , and @xmath179 the final limit is valid if and only if @xmath180 , and @xmath181 , thus we obtain scaling factors @xmath171 and @xmath182 . there is one final step , however , since the calculation above only implies the formula given in equation satisfies _ the weak notion of a limit shape_. we need some form of concentration result , i.e. , large deviations , to claim that the above formula is indeed the limit shape for the set of partitions . as we shall see , however , the same concentration results valid for the limit shape of @xmath183 also apply immediately to the image @xmath148 , see [ concentration ] . the bijection @xmath159 is a special case of a more general example discussed in section [ sect r ] . in addition , this example is typical of a general method to find limit shapes described in [ transfer : theorems ] . we denote the set of positive real numbers by @xmath184 . the set of all probability measures absolutely continuous with respect to lebesgue measure on the positive real line is denoted by @xmath185 . let @xmath186 denote the set of real valued operators on the banach space of real valued , countable sequences . we think of transformations in @xmath186 as infinite dimensional , real valued matrices . the expression @xmath187 means @xmath188 we denote the positive part of @xmath20 by @xmath189 the ceiling function , or smallest integer larger or equal to @xmath20 , is denoted by @xmath190 let @xmath191 denotes the _ gamma function _ , and @xmath192 the _ riemann zeta function_. define the family of constants @xmath193^{r/(1+r ) } \quad \text{for all } \ \. a \geq 2 , \ r \geq 1 , \ b>0\ts.\ ] ] we also define @xmath194 the letter @xmath35 is not restricted to a single value , but will be defined locally . given a sequence @xmath195 , @xmath196 , we denote the forward difference operator by @xmath197 we also define the @xmath198 difference recursively as @xmath199 the row vector @xmath200 has a transpose given by a column vector and is denoted by @xmath201 . from this point on , we adopt the notation that matrix indices are always integers , i.e. , @xmath202 for a given limit shape @xmath203 , we denote its compositional inverse by @xmath204 , or simply @xmath205 when the context is clear . in our setting , the domain and range of a limit shape is always the positive real numbers , and limit shapes are always monotonically decreasing , hence @xmath204 is also a function . an integer partition of a positive integer @xmath0 is an unordered list of nonnegative integers whose sum is @xmath0 . it is standard notation to list the parts in descending order , @xmath149 , and we denote the number of parts by @xmath206 . we say that @xmath207 is an integer partition of _ size _ @xmath0 if @xmath208 . each partition @xmath76 has a unique _ conjugate _ partition @xmath209 that satisfies @xmath210 , @xmath211 . we denote by @xmath212 the set of partitions of size @xmath0 , and @xmath213 denotes the set of partitions of all sizes . a subset of partitions @xmath214 is defined similarly , with @xmath215 . each partition @xmath216 has a corresponding ferrers diagram , which is a collection of points on a two - dimensional lattice corresponding to parts in the partition ; see figure [ ferrers ] and see also @xcite for a further explanation . we note , in particular , that the ferrers diagram for @xmath209 is a reflection of the ferrers diagram for @xmath76 about the line @xmath217 . let @xmath218 denote the multiplicity of parts of size @xmath11 , where @xmath48 . there is a natural one - to - one correspondence between partitions @xmath219 and sequences @xmath220 with @xmath221 . when there are no restrictions on the multiplicities of parts , we call such a partition _ unrestricted_. we define @xmath222 to be the set of partitions where parts of size @xmath11 can occur at most @xmath223 times , where @xmath224 , @xmath225 $ ] , @xmath48 . the case @xmath226 for all @xmath48 corresponds to distinct part sizes , and the case @xmath54 for all @xmath48 corresponds to unrestricted integer partitions . we use the term _ andrews class partitions _ to refer to sets @xmath227 . 0.3 @xmath228 0.3 @xmath17 we consider sequences @xmath229 where @xmath230 are strictly monotone increasing and are polynomials in @xmath58 ; that is , @xmath231 we can , in fact , consider more general sequences , however , there are added technical conditions which unnecessarily complicate the statement of our theorems , and since all of our examples take the simpler form in , we forego this added generality . see [ ingham form ] for a discussion on the consequences of such generalizations . when gcd@xmath232 , then in what follows , by @xmath233 we mean taking @xmath0 to infinity through integer multiples of @xmath234 . [ ingham : theorem ] assume the set @xmath235 satisfies , for some @xmath236 , and let @xmath237 and @xmath238 . let @xmath239 denote the number of partitions of @xmath0 into part sizes in @xmath235 . then we have @xmath240}{c_1\ , n^{\frac{b\,r + e}{b(r+1)}+\frac{1}{2}}}\ts,\ ] ] where @xmath241 is a constant , and where @xmath242 denotes the negatives of the roots of @xmath243 . [ rothszekeres ] assume the set @xmath235 satisfies for some @xmath32 , and let @xmath237 and @xmath238 . let @xmath244 denote the number of partitions of @xmath0 into distinct parts from @xmath235 . then we have @xmath245}{c_2\ , n^{\frac{b\,r + e}{2b(r+1)}+1}}\ts,\ ] ] where @xmath246 is a constant . whereas only the leading two coefficients of @xmath243 are relevant for theorem [ rothszekeres ] above , the values of the roots of @xmath243 are also needed in theorem [ ingham : theorem ] . however , in terms of limit shapes only the exponent @xmath7 and leading coefficient @xmath237 will play a fundamental role . a set of partitions @xmath247 taking parts only from the set @xmath235 will be called _ with parameters @xmath7 and @xmath248 _ if the multiplicities of parts is unrestricted and @xmath235 satisfies with @xmath249 . a set of partitions @xmath247 taking parts only from the set @xmath235 will be called _ restrictedly smooth with parameters @xmath7 , @xmath248 and @xmath250 _ if the multiplicity of each part size is strictly bounded from above by @xmath250 and @xmath235 satisfies with @xmath251 . for each @xmath216 , the _ diagram function _ of @xmath76 is a right - continuous step function @xmath252 defined as @xmath253 define a _ scaling function _ to be any positive , monotonically increasing function @xmath254 , such that @xmath255 as @xmath233 . we define the _ @xmath256-scaled diagram function _ of @xmath76 as @xmath257 our definition of limit shape is from @xcite , and is as follows . let @xmath258 denote a family of measures on subsets of partitions @xmath259 , where @xmath89 . in this paper we consider only @xmath260 , the uniform distribution . suppose there exists a scaling function @xmath261 and a piecewise continuous function @xmath262 such that @xmath263 . suppose further that for any finite collection @xmath264 of continuity points of @xmath265 , and any @xmath266 , @xmath267 we say that @xmath265 is the _ limit shape of _ @xmath268 under scaling function @xmath261 . similarly , define the _ conjugate diagram function _ @xmath269 , such that @xmath270 we similarly define the _ @xmath256-scaled conjugate diagram function _ @xmath271 suppose there exists a scaling function @xmath261 and a piecewise continuous function @xmath262 such that @xmath272 . suppose further , that for any finite collection @xmath273 of continuity points of @xmath265 , and any @xmath266 , we have @xmath274 then we say that @xmath275 is the _ conjugate limit shape of _ @xmath268 under scaling function @xmath261 . the scaling function @xmath261 in the definition of limit shape is not unique , since it can be replaced with any scaling function @xmath276 such that @xmath277 . one could consider an equivalence class of scaling functions in order to uniquely specify such a class of functions , but we do not pursue this further . in either case , when the limit shape of @xmath278 exists , it is unique since it must integrate to 1 . following @xcite , define the space @xmath279 of triples @xmath280 , and nonnegative monotonically decreasing functions @xmath281 , such that @xmath282 one can think of @xmath283 as the set of measures on @xmath284 of the form @xmath285 , where @xmath124 and @xmath286 are point masses at 0 and @xmath287 . note that @xmath288 for all @xmath289 and scaling functions @xmath261 , and similarly , @xmath290 for all @xmath289 and scaling functions @xmath261 . the space @xmath283 is closed , so all limits of diagram functions exist in @xmath283 , even when limit shapes do not exist . [ vanishing : mass]sometimes the limit shape does not exist , even though there is a scaling for which a limit _ curve _ exists . consider , as in ( * ? ? ? * example 3.4 ) , the set of partitions @xmath291 , @xmath152 , consisting of a @xmath292 square block and a @xmath293 tail . for each @xmath0 of the form @xmath294 , there is exactly one partition in @xmath268 of size @xmath0 . in fact , one can take the limit of the scaled diagram function through values of @xmath0 indicated , and obtain the limit _ curve _ @xmath295 which does not have unit area . this corresponds to the element @xmath296 . all other scaling functions would send the scaled diagram function to either @xmath297 or @xmath298 in the limit . the theorems below indicate the types of limit shape results already known , which we shall use to obtain new ones . they are specializations of ( * ? ? ? . 8) . [ special unrestricted ] suppose @xmath247 is with parameters @xmath299 and @xmath33 . let @xmath300 . then the limit shape of @xmath247 under scaling function @xmath301 exists and is denoted by @xmath302 , and we have @xmath303 theorem [ special unrestricted ] above covers a large class of examples of interest in our present setting . it is also the starting point for finding limit shapes of partitions with non - multiplicative restrictions in [ transfer : theorems ] . we will also need another particular specialization , which is when all multiplicities of allowable part sizes are strictly bounded from above by some fixed number @xmath304 . typically the value @xmath305 , i.e. , distinct parts , is sufficient , but [ od general ] contains an example where we need further generality . [ special distinct ] suppose @xmath247 is with parameters @xmath306 @xmath307 and @xmath304 . let @xmath308 . then the limit shape of @xmath107 under scaling function @xmath301 exists and is denoted by @xmath309 , and we have @xmath310 in particular , by taking @xmath311 and @xmath312 , respectively , in ( * ? ? ? * th . 8) , we recover theorem [ special unrestricted ] and theorem [ special distinct ] . two subsets of partitions @xmath313 are called equinumerous if @xmath314 for all @xmath89 . for sets @xmath315 , @xmath316 @xmath317 , we consider one - to - one correspondences @xmath318 which can be expressed as a real valued linear transformations . we define ( multiplicities to parts ) to be a one - to - one correspondence that maps , using a linear transformation , multiplicities of parts of partitions @xmath319 to parts of partitions @xmath320 for all @xmath0 . the transformation has the form @xmath321 for some set of coefficients @xmath322 such that @xmath323 to avoid excessive subscripting we have opted for the functional notation of indices , i.e. , @xmath324 instead of @xmath325 . similarly , we define ( multiplicities to multiplicities ) to be a one - to - one correspondence @xmath326 that maps , using a linear transformation , multiplicities of parts of partitions @xmath319 to multiplicities of parts of partitions @xmath320 . define the vector @xmath327 , with @xmath328 denote the multiplicities of @xmath61 by @xmath329 , then the transformation has the form @xmath330 and the vector @xmath331 is a left eigenvector of the matrix @xmath332 with eigenvalue 1 . we define @xmath333 when the correspondence @xmath334 is an or with coefficients @xmath332 , to emphasize the role of @xmath332 in the bijection , and to distinguish s and s from general one - to - one correspondences between sets of partitions ( see for example @xcite ) . we next extend the notion of and to countable sequences . in this setting , the matrix of coefficients @xmath335 lies in @xmath186 , which we recall is the set of real valued operators on the banach space of real valued , countable sequences . define also the vector @xmath336 , with @xmath337 for s , we have @xmath338 similarly , for s , we have the vector @xmath339 is a left eigenvector of matrix @xmath332 with eigenvalue 1 . note that it is not necessary for every entry of @xmath340 to be nonnegative . suppose @xmath214 denotes a set of partitions which is with parameters @xmath341 @xmath342 we denote the limit shape of @xmath268 by @xmath343 and , furthermore , we define @xmath344 as the continuous function @xmath345 which satisfies @xmath346 suppose there exists an or between a set of partitions @xmath268 and some other set of partitions @xmath347 , with coefficients @xmath332 . since partitions in @xmath268 only have parts in @xmath235 , the nonzero values of coefficients @xmath332 are of the form @xmath348 , @xmath48 , @xmath152 . we require a condition on the coefficients @xmath332 as follows . we let @xmath349 so that @xmath350 we say the coefficients @xmath332 are if there exists a bounded and piecewise continuous function @xmath351 such that for all @xmath138 and @xmath352 we have @xmath353 similarly , we say the coefficients @xmath332 are if there exists a bounded and piecewise continuous function @xmath351 such that for all @xmath138 and @xmath352 we have @xmath354 we say the coefficients @xmath332 are if there exists a bounded and piecewise continuous function @xmath351 such that for all @xmath138 and @xmath352 we have @xmath355 similarly , we say the coefficients @xmath332 are if there exists a bounded and piecewise continuous function @xmath351 such that for all @xmath138 and @xmath352 we have @xmath356 when an @xmath159 is defined by an set of coefficients @xmath332 , we say that bijection @xmath159 is , and we denote the limit shape of @xmath357 by @xmath358 . similarly , when an @xmath159 is defined by an set of coefficients @xmath332 , we say that bijection @xmath159 is , and we denote the limit shape of @xmath357 by @xmath359 . a bijection defined in terms of linear combinations of multiplicities of part sizes acts as a markov operator on the diagram function ; see for example ( * ? ? ? * section 2.3.39 ) . recall that a markov operator p is a linear operator that sends functions @xmath360 to @xmath361 and is such that 1 . @xmath362 for @xmath363 , and 2 . @xmath364 . the coefficients @xmath332 in equation correspond to an explicit form of the operator p. note that while we must have @xmath365 for all @xmath366 , there is no restriction that each entry @xmath324 be nonnegative . most noteworthy , however , is the fact that markov operators are linear contractions , and hence preserve a form of the large deviation principle , which we revisit in [ concentration ] . not all bijections give a means to compute the limit shape . for example , it is not apparent how to utilize dyson s iterated map for odd - distinct parts to compute limit shapes @xcite . a more natural example would be the _ garsia milne involution principle _ bijections of rogers ramanujan identities @xcite ( see also @xcite ) . both sides have a limit shape , however , we are not aware of any way to draw conclusions about one limit shape from the other using the involution , as it would seem to be difficult to do in general @xcite . we now state our key technical theorems , which specify conditions under which the limit shapes map continuously , and provide the means for computing an explicit formula . [ mt unrestricted ] suppose @xmath247 is with parameters @xmath299 and @xmath33 . let @xmath367 . 1 . if there exists a set of partitions @xmath368 and an @xmath369 that is , then the limit shape of @xmath357 under scaling function @xmath370 is given by @xmath371 2 . if there exists a set of partitions @xmath368 and an @xmath369 that is , then the conjugate limit shape of @xmath357 under scaling function @xmath370 is given by @xmath372 note that the integrand function @xmath373 in the theorem is not necessarily multiplicative with respect to its final argument , as it is in the case of convex partitions in [ convex ] ; see also section [ sect r ] . it is more generally a distribution ( in the analysis sense ) on @xmath374 , and we present an explicit example demonstrating the need for this generality in [ sect ohara ] . an analogous result holds for partitions with multiplicities all strictly bounded by some @xmath304 . [ thm dist ] suppose @xmath247 is with parameters @xmath306 @xmath33 , @xmath375 let @xmath376 . 1 . if there exists a set of partitions @xmath377 and an @xmath369 , defined by a set of coefficients @xmath378 that is , then @xmath379 is the limit shape under scaling function @xmath370 . 2 . if there exists a set of partitions @xmath377 and an @xmath369 , defined by a set of coefficients @xmath378 that is , then @xmath380 is the conjugate limit shape under scaling function @xmath370 . the case @xmath305 is most common , corresponding to partitions into distinct parts , but the analysis is the same for any @xmath304 , and we shall utilize the full generality in [ od general ] . in @xcite , a general paradigm for representing partition bijections is presented involving the composition of transformations acting on the young diagram of an integer partition . these transformations map points in the plane via a bijection @xmath381 in such a way that under certain conditions , the limit shape along with certain other statistics of interest are mapped continuously via these transformations . this property is referred to as _ asymptotic stability _ , and the limit shape is the statistic of the young diagram corresponding to the boundary . we briefly recount the transformations as they pertain to the mapping of the limit shape , and defer the interested reader to the more comprehensive treatment in @xcite . for example , _ stretch and paste _ corresponds to combining several components , say with boundaries @xmath382 , which exist on the same domain and with the same area , by taking the sum with an appropriate scaling to keep the sum of the resulting expression constant . we think of this operation as a shuffle , which corresponds to @xmath383 _ conjugation _ is equivalent to taking a functional inverse : @xmath384 . _ move _ adds a constant : @xmath385 . _ shift _ adds a linear function @xmath386 : @xmath387 . _ shred _ and move acting together on @xmath7 components effectively splits up the limit shape into @xmath7 pieces , each having shape scaled by @xmath7 with area @xmath388 , which corresponds to @xmath389 a _ union _ , or _ sort _ , between two components corresponds to the addition @xmath390 . the _ + _ operator between two components corresponds to the inverse to the addition of the inverses : @xmath391 . a _ cut _ is somewhat more complicated , and requires treating the limit shape as defining a region in the positive quadrant of @xmath392 , which can be split in two pieces , one of which is a piecewise function , the other being the inverse of a piece - wise function ; see for example , figure [ parallel : mapping : limit ] . it partitions the curve into two curves , say via projections @xmath393 and @xmath394 , as @xmath395 a paste _ by itself _ corresponds to combining two curves whose domains partition some region in @xmath392 into a single curve . under appropriate conditions , paste acts as the inverse to a cut , i.e. , @xmath396 . [ transformations ] the geometric transformations on integer partitions correspond to the following transformations on limit shapes . + [ cols="<,<",options="header " , ] throughout this section , @xmath7 is any fixed integer , @xmath398 . [ nonneg ] let @xmath399 denote the set of partitions with parts that have nonnegative @xmath397 differences ; i.e. , @xmath400 , @xmath48 for each @xmath401 . the conjugate limit shape of @xmath399 under scaling function @xmath370 is given by @xmath402 with explicit formula @xmath403 when @xmath91 , we obtain corollary [ conj convex ] . a similarly defined set of partitions with multiplicative restrictions is utilized to obtain this result . [ r - th triangular ] let @xmath404 denote the set of partitions into parts of sizes given by @xmath405 , @xmath406 . the limit shape of @xmath404 under scaling function @xmath407 is given by @xmath408 . we now define the bijection @xmath409 in @xcite , which is a straightforward generalization to the one in [ convex ] . for each @xmath410 , let @xmath411 denote the number of parts of size @xmath412 in @xmath76 . then @xmath413 is given by @xmath414 [ rth lemma ] the bijection @xmath415 is an . moreover , @xmath415 is @xmath416 , with @xmath417 for @xmath418 and @xmath419 , we have @xmath420 , and 0 otherwise . we have @xmath421 with @xmath422 , @xmath423 , we have @xmath424 so @xmath425 hence , @xmath426 where @xmath427 , and @xmath428 which implies the result . let @xmath429 denote the set of partitions with all parts odd and @xmath430 denote the set of partitions with all parts distinct . we show in this section that glaisher s bijection @xmath431 is an , and present several extensions . recall the following classical result . for each @xmath89 , we have @xmath432 . glaisher s bijection @xmath157 is defined as follows . start with @xmath433 . replace each part of size @xmath434 with @xmath435 parts of size @xmath436 , for all @xmath437 and @xmath436 odd . define the sets @xmath438odd parts with multiplicities @xmath439 and @xmath440distinct parts not divisible by @xmath441 . the bijection @xmath431 , restricted to @xmath442 and @xmath443 , shows that @xmath444 for all @xmath299 . the limit shapes of @xmath443 and @xmath442 exist , and the bijection between them was shown to be a geometric bijection @xcite . an informal calculation in @xcite derives the limit shape of @xmath429 using the limit shapes @xmath442 for all @xmath299 . below we formalize this calculation by showing that glaisher s bijection @xmath157 is an . glaisher s bijection @xmath445 is an for all @xmath446 . furthermore , glaisher s bijection @xmath431 is an . for clarity of exposition , we first show cases @xmath447 then we show in full generality . in the case @xmath448 , @xmath449 and @xmath450 , the identity transformation . the transformation matrix is given by @xmath451 for all @xmath452 , and 0 otherwise . in the case @xmath91 , @xmath453 consists of parts of odd size and even parts not divisible by 4 . the transformation is given by @xmath454 the general case @xmath455 has transformation given by @xmath456 it follows that @xmath457 is a transformation matrix for an for all @xmath152 . using pointwise convergence in @xmath186 , we have @xmath458 as @xmath459 , where @xmath460 it is easy to verify that @xmath461 has a left eigenvector of @xmath462 corresponding to eigenvalue 1 . thus , glaisher s bijection @xmath431 is an . we will refer to the transformation @xmath461 from equation as _ glaisher s linear transformation_. a generalization to euler s theorem was given by andrews @xcite ( see also @xcite ) . for vectors @xmath463 and @xmath464 , let @xmath315 and @xmath316 denote the andrews class partitions @xmath227 and @xmath465 of size @xmath0 , respectively . define @xmath466 to be the set of all @xmath48 such that @xmath467 . we say that @xmath468 if there exists a bijection @xmath469 such that @xmath470 for all @xmath471 . [ andrews theorem ] if @xmath468 , then @xmath314 for all @xmath89 . we have : @xmath472 where we assume the convention that @xmath473 . the following algorithm , see @xcite , performs the bijection given by andrews classes of partitions , and is known as _ s algorithm_. for sets of partitions @xmath227 and @xmath465 , suppose @xmath474 . start with @xmath475 . replace @xmath44 parts of size @xmath11 with @xmath476 parts of size @xmath53 , where as before @xmath471 , @xmath65 repeat until @xmath477 for all @xmath65 in its full generality , ohara s algorithm is not asymptotically stable , and may require exponentially many steps , see @xcite . in the special case below , however , the algorithm is in a sense monotonic , and gives a valid alternative approach to obtaining glaisher s linear bijection . consider @xmath478 , @xmath479 and @xmath480 , @xmath481 , with @xmath482 . ohara s algorithm exchanges each even part for two parts of half the size . this is repeated until all parts are odd . denote by @xmath483 the linear transformation of one step in ohara s algorithm . then @xmath484 each step in ohara s algorithm corresponds to multiplication of the vector of multiplicities by the matrix @xmath483 . let @xmath485 denote @xmath58 steps in ohara s algorithm . we have : @xmath486 using pointwise convergence in @xmath186 , we have : @xmath487 where @xmath488 let @xmath489 denote the integrand for the limit shape of partitions into distinct parts . [ glaisher : relation ] glaisher s linear transformation is for @xmath490 with @xmath491 moreover , the limit shapes satisfy @xmath492 note first that @xmath493 , so @xmath494 next , we split the terms @xmath495 according to the integer @xmath58 for which we have . this gives @xmath497 note that @xmath461 corresponds to a markov operator p acting on the diagram function @xmath498 , with @xmath499 let @xmath500 for all @xmath501 , so that @xmath502 , and take the limit of the expectation , as @xmath233 . we obtain : @xmath503 \ , = \ , \sum_{i\geq 1 } \. \frac{\a^2}{2n } \. \sum_{j : y_j \geq t/2^{i-1 } } 2^{i-1 } \e z_{y_j \a 2^{i-1 } } \delta y_j \ , \. \longrightarrow \ , \. \frac{1}{2 } \. \sum_{i \geq 1 } \psi\mts\left(t/ 2^{i-1}\right ) , \quad t>0\. , \ ] ] which is finite for each @xmath138 if and only if @xmath504 . finally , note that also directly we have @xmath503 \to \sqrt{2 } \. \phi\left(t\.\sqrt{2}\right),\ ] ] which is the standard expression for the limit shape of partitions into odd parts . this example also demonstrates that the function @xmath373 in equation is not always multiplicative with respect to its final argument . another way to understand the connection between the limit shapes of @xmath505 and @xmath506 is via the construction of a geometric bijection . in this case , the bijection is more complicated , see ( * ? ? ? * figure 16 ) , but the same rules apply to the limit shape . a summary of the mappings is below . note that instead of mapping the diagram function at each stage , we have instead chosen to demonstrate how the bijection acts on the conjugate diagram function . we have : @xmath507where the final equality comes from a straightforward rearrangement of terms . in this section , @xmath32 , and @xmath508 are integers . the following is a generalization of theorem [ glaisher : relation ] . [ stanton : relation ] let @xmath268 denote the set of partitions into perfect @xmath397 powers with multiplicity at most @xmath509 , with limit shape given by @xmath510 . let @xmath357 denote the set of partitions into perfect @xmath397 powers not divisible by @xmath511 , with limit shape given by @xmath512 then we have @xmath513 note that the limit shapes of @xmath268 and @xmath357 in theorem [ stanton : relation ] follow from theorem [ special unrestricted ] and theorem [ special distinct ] , respectively . the relation in equation is obtained from the following generalization of euler s theorem . [ q prop]let @xmath514 be a sequence of distinct positive integers , and let @xmath515 be an integer . if @xmath516 is an integer for all @xmath58 , then the number of integer partitions of @xmath0 into parts of sizes avoiding @xmath517 is equal to the number of integer partitions of @xmath0 into parts of size @xmath514 , where @xmath243 has multiplicity at most @xmath518 . theorem [ q prop ] also follows by andrews s theorem [ andrews theorem ] using the mapping @xmath519 . the generalization of glaisher s bijection in this case is replacing parts of size @xmath520 into @xmath521 parts of size @xmath243 . when @xmath522 and @xmath523 , we obtain glaisher s bijection . stanton s @xmath524-bijection _ @xmath525 as follows . replace parts of size @xmath526 into @xmath527 parts of size @xmath528 , for all @xmath152 not divisible by @xmath511 . stanton s @xmath524-bijection @xmath529 is an . stanton s @xmath524-bijection can be written using the transformation matrix @xmath530 with entries @xmath531 for all @xmath152 not divisible by @xmath511 and @xmath532 . theorem [ stanton : relation ] then follows from equation in a similar fashion as the proof of theorem [ glaisher : relation ] . in this section , we use a bijection due to bressoud , see @xcite , to obtain the limit shape below . [ lebesgue : theorem ] let @xmath533 . let @xmath534 denote the set of partitions @xmath61 into parts congruent to @xmath535 or @xmath536 mod @xmath58 such that parts differ by at least @xmath58 , and parts congruent to @xmath536 mod @xmath58 differ by at least @xmath537 . the limit shape of @xmath534 is given by @xmath538 , \quad t \geq 0\. .\ ] ] let @xmath315 denote the set of partitions of size @xmath0 into distinct parts which are congruent to @xmath539 or @xmath5 modulo @xmath72 . let @xmath540 denote the set of partitions @xmath61 of size @xmath0 with consecutive parts @xmath62 for even part sizes @xmath63 and @xmath64 for all odd part sizes @xmath63 , @xmath48 . recall _ bressoud s bijection _ @xmath541 illustrated in figure [ bressoud ] ( see @xcite ) . the bijection @xmath157 is used in @xcite to prove lebesgue s identity , given below . we have : @xmath542 , the set of partitions @xmath61 with consecutive parts @xmath62 for even part sizes @xmath63 and @xmath64 for all odd part sizes @xmath63 , @xmath366 . ] the proof of theorem [ lebesgue : theorem ] , using @xmath543 and @xmath544 for simplicity , is explicitly worked out below , and a plot appears in figure [ lebesgue : plot ] . whereas the value of @xmath536 is an important aspect of the bijection , the limit shape is invariant to the particular value of @xmath536 chosen . let @xmath268 denote the set of partitions into distinct parts which are congruent to @xmath539 or @xmath5 modulo @xmath72 . let @xmath60 denote the set of partitions @xmath61 with consecutive parts @xmath545 for even part sizes @xmath63 and @xmath64 for all odd part sizes @xmath63 , @xmath366 . by theorem [ special distinct ] , the limit shape of @xmath268 is given by @xmath546 since the bijection to @xmath60 is given by a geometric bijection , see ( * ? ? ? * corollary 10.2 ) , the limit shape of @xmath60 exists , and we now derive its explicit form . we are unaware of its explicit form appearing in the literature . in figure [ bressoud ] , each non - blue square is the equivalent of two dots side by side , and each blue square is the equivalent of one dot . asymptotically , this distinction is negligible , but for the bijection it is essential . the first step in the bijection is to separate all of the parts divisible by three ; call this partition @xmath547 , and the partition consisting of the remaining parts by @xmath548 . the first step of the bijection , see remark [ stable : remark ] below , is the map @xmath549 which corresponds to separating the limit curves of @xmath550 and @xmath547 , respectively , in figure [ bressoud ] . note that since @xmath551 , we have @xmath552 . . 0.3 0.3 0.3 the next step in the bijection is to separate out partitions @xmath256 and @xmath553 from @xmath548 . the bijection places all parts in @xmath554 which are @xmath555 in @xmath553 , and leaves the rest in @xmath256 . since @xmath556 is an asymptotically stable statistic , with @xmath557 , we may further separate limit curves @xmath558 corresponding to @xmath559 as follows : @xmath560 where @xmath561 @xmath562 for @xmath563 , and @xmath564 we also need the following inverses : @xmath565 the limit curve of @xmath566 is given by @xmath567 the limit curve of @xmath568 is the line @xmath569 , for @xmath570 . we let @xmath571 now we subtract out the staircase by defining @xmath572 and @xmath573 . denote the limit curve of @xmath574 by @xmath575 and the limit curve of @xmath576 by @xmath577 . we have @xmath578 ( red ) , @xmath568 ( black ) , and @xmath574 ( blue ) . ] next , we sort the parts of partitions @xmath574 and @xmath576 , which corresponds to a union of parts ; call this partition @xmath579 , with corresponding limit curve @xmath580 . first , we have @xmath581 and @xmath582 note that @xmath583 for @xmath584 . therefore , @xmath585 the last step of the bijection adds partitions @xmath579 and @xmath568 , and corresponds to the conjugate limit shape of @xmath60 . namely , @xmath586 we can also invert to obtain the limit shape of @xmath60 . to obtain the inverse , we solve for @xmath587 in @xmath588 where @xmath589 , and @xmath590 . the positive solution for positive @xmath587 is of the form @xmath591 the limit shape of @xmath60 is thus given by @xmath592 this completes the proof of theorem [ lebesgue : theorem ] . [ stable : remark]note that the limit shapes of @xmath547 and @xmath593 do not follow from any of the transformations defined in [ geometric transformations ] . instead , the limit shapes exist in the stated form by section [ sect prob ] . first , the expected number of parts divisible by three over any collection of @xmath594 parts , @xmath595 , in the joint distribution of independent random variables exists and is given by @xmath596 . appealing again to section [ sect prob ] , we see that the pointwise convergence of expectation of the independent random variables is sufficient to guarantee convergence in probability for the set of integer partitions . from the limit shape given in equation , we can now obtain various statistics . for example , the expected number of parts in a random partition in @xmath60 is given by @xmath597 , which corresponds to equation in corollary [ number : of : parts : cor ] . to obtain corollary [ durfee : square : cor ] , we solve either for @xmath598 or @xmath599 . in this case , solving for @xmath600 using equation is the simpler calculation , from which equation follows . in this section , let @xmath601 denote a fixed positive integer , i.e. @xmath602 . [ diff : d : theorem ] let @xmath603 denote the set of partitions @xmath61 in which @xmath604 ; that is , parts are at least @xmath601 apart and there is no restriction on the number of parts . let @xmath605 denote the limit shape of @xmath603 . then we have @xmath606 , \qquad x>0\.,\ ] ] where @xmath607 where @xmath608 is the unique solution to @xmath609 in the interval @xmath610 , and @xmath35 is the solution to @xmath611 here @xmath612 is the usual _ dilogarithm function _ , which for positive real - valued inputs @xmath20 is defined as @xmath613 it is easy to obtain a minimal difference @xmath601 partition : take any partition @xmath614 and apply the transformation @xmath615 , for all @xmath616 . this mapping , however , is not size - preserving , as it is between unrestricted partitions of @xmath0 into exactly @xmath58 parts , and minimal difference @xmath601 partitions of @xmath617 into exactly @xmath58 parts . geometrically , we are adding a right triangle with slope @xmath601 whose right angle lies at the origin to the _ conjugate _ limit shape . [ theorem diff d k ] let @xmath618 denote the set of partitions @xmath61 into exactly @xmath58 parts , in which @xmath604 for @xmath619 . suppose @xmath620 . , and @xmath602 . let @xmath621 denote the limit shape of @xmath618 . then we have @xmath622 , \qquad x>0\. , \ ] ] where @xmath623 . let @xmath624 denote the set of minimal difference @xmath601 partitions of @xmath0 into exactly @xmath58 parts . let @xmath625 denote the set of unrestricted partitions of @xmath0 into exactly @xmath58 parts . we have @xmath626 , so we must tilt the distribution of the random size of the partition to have expected value @xmath627 and exactly @xmath58 parts . by conjugation , each partition in @xmath625 corresponds to an unrestricted partition with largest part at most @xmath58 . hence , for @xmath628 @xmath629 , we may generate the conjugate limit shape of @xmath630 which we denote by @xmath631 , directly using the method of section [ sect prob ] . let @xmath632 denote the limit shape of @xmath625 for @xmath633 , @xmath634 . we have @xmath635 where @xmath35 is the constant defined by the equation @xmath636 in @xcite , it is shown that the constant @xmath35 satisfies @xmath637 however , rather than tilt the distribution of a random partition to have expected size @xmath0 , we instead tilt the distribution so that the expected size of the partition is @xmath638 . this changes the limit shape from @xmath632 to a limit curve , say @xmath639 , given by @xmath640 where @xmath641 is such that @xmath642 the final step is to add the triangle of slope @xmath601 , i.e. , the curve @xmath643 , to @xmath639 . rearranging the terms yields equation . theorem [ diff : d : theorem ] then follows by the result below , c.f . [ romik : mistake ] . a random partition in @xmath603 has number of parts asymptotic to @xmath644 , where @xmath547 is given by equation . this section presents a bijection which requires one additional transformation before applying the conjugation transformation , see figure [ stretch ] . , the set of partitions into even parts such that the largest part has size @xmath646 , and @xmath647 , the set of partitions into even parts such that the number of parts is @xmath645 . ] [ ank][bb : theorem ] let @xmath647 denote the set of partitions into even parts such that the number of parts is @xmath645 . suppose @xmath648 , and let @xmath649 . then the limit shape of @xmath650 is given by @xmath651 where @xmath35 is the constant such that @xmath652 . let @xmath653 denote the set of partitions into even parts such that the largest part has size @xmath646 . the map @xmath654 given in ( * ? ? ? * section 5 ) is defined as follows : divide each part of @xmath655 by 2 , double the resulting multiplicities , and take the conjugate . for each @xmath89 and @xmath656 , the map @xmath334 is a bijection between sets @xmath653 and @xmath647 . bijection @xmath334 is an . the bijection @xmath334 corresponds to the transformation matrix @xmath657 furthermore , this transformation @xmath483 can also be realized as a composition of two transformations , @xmath658 , where @xmath659 @xmath660 we have @xmath661 is the conjugate transformation , and @xmath662 is the transformation @xmath663 defined above . suppose @xmath664 . let @xmath665 and let @xmath666 . the bijection @xmath667 is with @xmath448 , @xmath668 , scaling function @xmath504 , and @xmath669 for @xmath670 and 0 otherwise . [ ab : theorem ] suppose @xmath648 , and let @xmath671 . the limit shape of @xmath672 under scaling function @xmath504 is given by @xmath673 where @xmath35 is the constant such that @xmath674 . in fact , as written , the constant @xmath35 in theorem [ ab : theorem ] and the constant @xmath35 in theorem [ bb : theorem ] coincide . for any @xmath508 and @xmath32 , let @xmath675 denote the set of partitions of @xmath0 into parts from the set @xmath235 with @xmath676 , with largest part having size at most @xmath677 let @xmath678 denote the set of partitions of @xmath0 into parts from the set @xmath235 with @xmath676 and number of summands @xmath645 . the bijection @xmath679 is as follows : divide each part of @xmath680 by @xmath511 , multiply the resulting multiplicities by @xmath511 , and take the conjugate . define @xmath681 and similarly @xmath682 . suppose @xmath683 . let @xmath681 and similarly let @xmath682 . 1 . ( cf . [ history ] ) the limit shape of @xmath684 under scaling function @xmath685 is given by @xmath686 where @xmath35 is a constant such that @xmath687 . the bijection @xmath688 is with @xmath689 , scaling function @xmath685 , and @xmath690 for @xmath691 and 0 otherwise . the limit shape of @xmath692 under scaling function @xmath693 is given by @xmath694 where @xmath35 is the constant such that @xmath695 . in this section we introduce the probabilistic tools used in the proofs of the theorems . denote by @xmath696 a random partition of size @xmath0 , where each partition is equally likely . similarly , denote by @xmath697 the number of parts of size @xmath11 in the random partition @xmath696 , so that @xmath698 is satisfied with probability 1 . the diagram function ( see [ diagram functions ] ) for a random partition of size @xmath0 is given by @xmath699 [ convergence lemma ] let @xmath700 denote a sequence of _ independent _ , but not identically distributed , geometrically distributed random variables with parameters @xmath168 , @xmath211 , where @xmath701 , @xmath702 , @xmath703 . we write @xmath704 and @xmath705 when the parameters are understood by context . the diagram function @xmath706 of equation is constrained to have fixed total area for a given @xmath0 , corresponding to a partition of fixed size @xmath0 , for @xmath707 . the random variables @xmath708 and @xmath709 are related by , for all @xmath703 , @xmath710 see @xcite ; see also @xcite . here , equality means in distribution . we next introduce a sequence of random variables @xmath711 , where @xmath712 is defined as the value of @xmath713 conditional on @xmath714 , @xmath48 , @xmath715 , @xmath703 ; that is , @xmath716 we also allow for the case when @xmath717 , in which case we have @xmath718 . denote by @xmath719 a random partition of fixed size @xmath0 from an unrestrictedly smooth or restrictedly smooth set of partitions with parameters @xmath32 and @xmath33 . let @xmath720 denote the number of parts of size @xmath11 in the random partition @xmath719 , @xmath211 . then @xmath721 for @xmath722 and @xmath723 , @xmath724 . an analogous result to holds , namely , for all @xmath703 , @xmath725 for a given scaling function @xmath261 and constant @xmath35 , define the _ tilting parameter _ we define the _ independence diagram function _ by @xmath727 it has the same form as the diagram function @xmath728 , except it is a sum of independent random variables . the tilting parameter @xmath729 tilts the distribution , and we choose @xmath35 so that the expected area of @xmath730 is @xmath0 . in this particular case , the tilt given in equation also maximizes the probability that the area of @xmath730 is @xmath0 ( see ( * ? ? ? * section 5 ) ) . we also define the _ scaled independence diagram function _ as @xmath731 in this section , we formalize the intuition that the weak notion of a limit shape , i.e. , the pointwise convergence in expectation of the scaled independence diagram function , coincides with the limit shape of a certain set of integer partitions . [ distribution is sufficient ] let @xmath732 denote the scaled independence diagram function corresponding to a set of partitions @xmath247 which is either restrictedly smooth or unrestrictedly smooth . suppose there exists a piecewise continuous function @xmath733 , such that , @xmath734\ \longrightarrow\ \phi(t ) \qquad \text { for each continuity point \,\. $ t>0$}.\ ] ] then the limit shape of @xmath268 is given by @xmath265 . the same kind of result holds in our setting as well . note that an or @xmath735 induces a continuous , bijective map @xmath736 . for diagram functions , we have @xmath737 [ distribution : sufficient : bijection ] let @xmath732 denote the scaled independence diagram function corresponding to a set of partitions @xmath247 which is either restrictedly smooth or unrestrictedly smooth with parameters @xmath32 and @xmath33 . suppose there exists a piecewise continuous function @xmath733 , such that , @xmath738\ \longrightarrow\ \phi(t ) , \quad \text { for each continuity point \,\. $ t>0$}.\ ] ] suppose further there exists a set of partitions @xmath357 and an or @xmath739 that is . suppose there exists a piecewise continuous function @xmath740 , such that , @xmath741\ \longrightarrow\ \phi_k(t ) , \quad \text { for each continuity point \,\. $ t>0$}.\ ] ] then the limit shape of @xmath357 is given by @xmath742 . the proof is straightforward , but requires several technical lemmas , so we present it in the section below . the analogous theorem , valid for geometric transformations , is stated below . [ geo distr ] let @xmath732 denote the scaled independence diagram function corresponding to a set of partitions @xmath247 which is either restrictedly smooth or unrestrictedly smooth . suppose there exists a piecewise continuous function @xmath733 , such that , @xmath743\ \longrightarrow\ \phi(t ) \qquad \quad \quad \text { for each continuity point \,\. $ t>0$}.\ ] ] suppose further there exists a set of partitions @xmath357 and a geometric bijection @xmath744 . then the limit shape of @xmath357 exists and can be found via the application of transformations in theorem [ transformations ] . in addition , each geometric transformation is asymptotically stable . each geometric transformation is a continuous injection in the space @xmath185 , and thus the contraction principle applies to each transformation individually . the proof has two steps . the first establishes an exponential concentration , and the second is an example of overpowering the conditioning " ( see ( * ? ? ? * section 10 ) ) ; that is , that the conditioning on the event @xmath745 is not too strong . let @xmath746 denote the pointwise limit of the expected value of a scaled independence diagram function . a well - known and key calculation is the following : @xmath747 this formalizes the intuition that it is sufficient to have a large deviation which is little - o of the probability of hitting the target . first , we note that it is sufficient to find a concentration inequality for the _ independence _ diagram , as long as we have some bound on the probability of hitting the target of interest . fortunately , in the case of integer partitions , much is already known . [ large deviation ] suppose @xmath748 is the independence diagram function for a set of partitions @xmath247 that is either unrestrictedly smooth or restrictedly smooth with parameters @xmath299 and @xmath33 . assume @xmath749 for all continuity points @xmath138 of @xmath265 . then for every @xmath266 , there exists @xmath750 such that for all @xmath0 large enough we have @xmath751 where @xmath752 is a constant that does not depend on @xmath0 . [ local bound ] suppose @xmath235 is with parameters @xmath32 and @xmath33 , and @xmath753 ; or , @xmath235 is with parameters @xmath32 and @xmath33 for some @xmath754 , and @xmath755 . then , there exists an @xmath756 such that @xmath757 where @xmath758 is a constant that does not depend on @xmath0 . under the assumptions of theorem [ distribution : sufficient : bijection ] , for every @xmath266 , there exists @xmath759 such that for all @xmath0 large enough , we have @xmath760 where @xmath761 is a constant that does not depend on @xmath0 . equation follows by the contraction principle for continuous bijections , see ( * ? ? ? 4.2.1 ) . in @xcite , a large deviation principle ( ldp ) is presented for a general class of measures over a process of _ independent coordinates _ , which is stronger than theorem [ large deviation ] . in particular , the authors of @xcite let @xmath762 denote a sequence of non - negative integers , and say that @xmath763 is of type @xmath764 whenever @xmath765 in this more general context , @xmath766 denotes the number of different kinds of parts of size @xmath58 ; for example , we can give each part of size 1 any of @xmath767 colors , each part of size 2 can be any of @xmath768 colors , etc . in this paper , we consider only the case @xmath769 for all @xmath58 . in particular , for a sequence @xmath770 , this corresponds to @xmath771 then , as in @xcite , we let @xmath772 denote the positive , @xmath773finite measure on @xmath774 which has density @xmath775 . then the corresponding limit shapes given in @xcite , namely , @xmath776 and @xmath777 , correspond to our @xmath778 and @xmath779 . in our setting , the ldp is an asymptotic expression , both upper and lower bounds , governing the exponential rate at which a sequence of measures , say @xmath780 , assigns probability to a given measurable event as @xmath781 . for example , a typical event is of the form @xmath782 , and we say that measure @xmath780 satisfies the ldp with rate @xmath261 and good rate function @xmath783 if it has the form @xmath784 this is equivalent to @xmath785 and is stronger than the inequality in theorem [ large deviation ] . there are further details which pertain to the topology of convergence , a weakening of the limit as a @xmath786 and @xmath787 , and the precise form of the rate function @xmath788 . these details are relevant in order to distinguish between limit shapes of andrews partitions with unrestricted multiplicities of allowable part sizes , where the expected number of parts grows like @xmath789 , and andrews partitions with bounded multiplicities of allowable part sizes , where the expected number of parts grows like @xmath790 . in the former case , we only obtain pointwise convergence . in the latter case , the ldp is obtained in the topology of uniform convergence . we are only able to prove a ldp when the allowable part sizes have bounded multiplicity , see theorem [ our ldp ] below . let @xmath791 denote an interval , and let @xmath792 be the space of all functions @xmath793 that are left - continuous and have right limits . let @xmath794 denote the subset of @xmath795 of non - increasing absolutely continuous functions @xmath796 which satisfy @xmath797 , and let @xmath798 } \subset \mathcal{ac}_{\infty}$ ] denote the set of functions with derivatives which are lebesgue - a.e . in the interval @xmath799 $ ] . we write the lebesgue decomposition of @xmath796 as @xmath800 , where @xmath801 denotes the absolutely continuous part of @xmath796 , and @xmath802 denotes the singular part . let @xmath803 denote the derivative of a function @xmath804 with respect to @xmath805 . we write @xmath601 instead of @xmath806 just for equation below . define @xmath807 for all @xmath808 and @xmath809 , otherwise . here @xmath810 denotes the relative entropy between functions @xmath796 and @xmath804 . [ our ldp ] suppose the set of partitions @xmath247 is with parameters @xmath299 and @xmath33 and @xmath754 . then the diagram functions @xmath811 satisfy the large deviation principle in @xmath812 ( equipped with the topology of uniform convergence ) , with speed @xmath813 and good rate function @xmath814 , given by equation . for partitions without any restrictions on allowable part sizes , there is an area transformation that allows one to conclude that the ldp for the independent process also applies to the dependent process . when restrictions like @xmath770 are imposed , this area transformation is no longer defined . we now supply an appropriate area transformation and prove the above claim , _ which only covers the case when the multiplicity of each part size is bounded_. our treatment closely mimics @xcite . let @xmath815 denote the size of the partition @xmath76 . we define the transformation @xmath816 by 1 . if @xmath817 , then @xmath818 . 2 . if @xmath819 , then 1 . if there exists a set of partitions of size @xmath58 consisting of parts from @xmath820 , with each part size having multiplicity strictly less than @xmath250 , for @xmath821 then @xmath816 adds the parts of the partition which has the least number of parts to @xmath76 ; in the case of a tie , we choose the partition which is lower in lexicographic order ; 2 . if there does not exist a set of partitions of size @xmath58 consisting of parts from @xmath820 , then @xmath816 is the partition of @xmath0 in @xmath247 with the least number of parts . we now note the following properties of the transformation @xmath822 : 1 . for some fixed @xmath823 that does not depend on @xmath0 , and for @xmath0 large enough , we have @xmath824 for all @xmath825 . 2 . for any @xmath76 with @xmath817 , we have @xmath826 3 . let @xmath827 , which we will choose later . for any @xmath828 with @xmath829 , and for @xmath0 sufficiently large , we have @xmath830 where @xmath831 is some real valued constant which does not depend on @xmath0 . in addition , @xmath832 + where @xmath833 is some real valued constant which does not depend on @xmath0 . next , we define the sets @xmath834 define @xmath835 . then @xmath0 can be taken sufficiently large , so that we have @xmath836 thus , for such sufficiently large @xmath0 , we have @xmath837 \. \exp\bigl(c\ , \delta\ , n^{1/(r+1)}\bigr ) \. \pr(n^{-1}n(\lambda)=1 , \dhat_\lambda \in b_{\phi,\delta_r } ) , \end{aligned}\ ] ] and @xmath838 \. \exp(c\ , \delta\ , n^{\eta - r/(r+1 ) } ) \. \pr(n^{-1}n(\lambda)=1 , \dhat_\lambda \in b_{\phi,\delta_r } ) . \end{aligned}\ ] ] thus , for any @xmath827 , we have @xmath839 where @xmath840 is given by equation . the rest of the proof is straightforward ; the only ingredient previously missing was the area transformation @xmath841 and the inequality given by equation , which holds under the assumption that @xmath235 is with parameters @xmath842 , @xmath33 , and any @xmath843 . finally , we note that our transformation @xmath841 does not apply for integer partitions into unrestricted part sizes , as our proof relies on the total number of parts in a typical partition to be @xmath844 as @xmath781 . for @xmath845 and @xmath304 , let @xmath846 @xmath366 , @xmath847 , and @xmath848 be defined as in [ convergence lemma ] . define @xmath849 $ ] , which has explicit form given by @xmath850 note that @xmath851 . similarly , when multiplicities are unrestricted , we define @xmath852 we are now ready to state and prove our general theorem regarding limit shapes . we assume for the rest of the section that the set @xmath235 is such that @xmath247 is or with parameters @xmath299 , @xmath33 , @xmath304 . let @xmath195 be such that as @xmath23 , we have @xmath853 , @xmath854 . then as @xmath233 , we have @xmath855 & = \frac{n^{r/(1+r)}}{n } \sum_{k\in u : k\geq t \a } \e [ z_k ] \\ & \sim \ , \begin{cases } \sum_{y_k \geq ( t / b)^{1/r } } e\left(e^{-c\ , b\ , y_k^r}\right ) \delta y_k \to \phi(t ; r , b ) , & \text{for theorem~\ref{special unrestricted } } , \\ \sum_{y_k \geq ( t / b)^{1/r } } e_a\left(e^{-c\ , b\ , y_k^r}\right ) \delta y_k \to \phi(t ; r , b , a ) , & \text{for theorem~\ref{special distinct}}. \end{cases}\end{aligned}\ ] ] by theorem [ distribution is sufficient ] , this calculation is sufficient to establish the limit shape . we continue to use the notation from [ proof special distinct ] . in the case of an , we have @xmath856 taking expectation , and applying equation and equation , as @xmath23 we have @xmath857 & = \frac{\b}{n } \sum_{y_k \geq 0 } v({\b t,\a b\ , y_k^r})\ , \mathbb{e}\left[z_{b\th y_k^r \a}\right ] \\ & \longrightarrow \begin{cases } \int_0^\infty k\left(t , y , e\left(e^{-c\ , b\ , y^r}\right ) \right)\ , dy , & \text{for theorem~\ref{mt unrestricted } , } \\ \int_0^\infty k\left(t , y , e_a\left(e^{-c\ , b\ , y^r}\right ) \right)\ , dy , & \text{for theorem~\ref{thm dist}. } \end{cases}\end{aligned}\ ] ] in the case of an , similarly by equation and equation , as @xmath23 we have @xmath858 & = \frac{\b}{n } \sum_{i \geq t \b } \sum_{k \geq 1 } v ( { \b t , u_k})\ , \e z_{u_k } \\ & \longrightarrow \begin{cases } \int_0^\infty k\left(t , y , e\left(e^{-c\ , b\ , y^r}\right)\right)\ , dy , & \text{for theorem~\ref{mt unrestricted } , } \\ \int_0^\infty k\left(t , y , e_a\left(e^{-c\ , b\ , y^r}\right)\right)\ , dy , & \text{for theorem~\ref{thm dist}. } \end{cases } \end{aligned}\ ] ] by theorem [ distribution : sufficient : bijection ] , the proof is complete . [ [ history ] ] ~ the probabilistic model utilized for integer partitions goes back to khinchin @xcite . the explicit form of the limit shape curve @xmath746 for unrestricted integer partitions was derived via heuristic arguments by temperley @xcite . he applied the method of steepest descents to the generating function for @xmath4 , the number of partitions of size @xmath0 , in order to describe the equilibrium state of crystalline structures . several decades later , kerov and vershik @xcite found and proved the limit shape for integer partitions under the _ plancherel measure _ , which weights each partition of size @xmath0 by the squared dimension @xmath859 of the corresponding irreducible representation of @xmath860 . its formula ( rotated by @xmath861 ) is given by @xmath862 we refer to @xcite for a thorough and well written proof of this result and its applications . let us mention that the final section of @xcite states without proof that the approach used also gives the limit shape of integer partitions under the uniform measure . a followup paper by vershik @xcite states the strong notion of a limit shape for uniformly random integer partitions , but leaves out the essential details which imply the strong version from the weak one , sometimes referred to as equivalence of ensembles " in the statistical mechanics literature . in parallel to the probabilistic notions of a limit shape , there was an early interest in understanding the joint distribution of part sizes , which appears to begin with the work of erds and lehmer on the largest part size @xcite , later extended by erds and szalay @xcite to the largest @xmath805 part sizes , where @xmath138 is fixed . a significant improvement occurred with the work of fristedt @xcite , who extended many but not all of the results to the largest @xmath863 part sizes . pittel fully resolved the strong notion of a limit shape in @xcite . the proof starts by confirming a conjecture of arratia and tavare @xcite governing the total variation distance between the joint distribution of component sizes and the joint distribution of appropriately chosen independent random variables , precisely those defined in section [ sect prob ] , and essentially extending fristedt s results to the largest @xmath864 part sizes . the _ total variation distance _ between two distributions , say @xmath865 and @xmath866 , is defined as @xmath867 where @xmath868 is a borel subset of @xmath869 . there are two initial , complementary results , governing the smallest part sizes and the largest part sizes . ? * th . 1 ) ) in the definitions from section [ sect prob ] , let @xmath870 , with @xmath871 , and suppose @xmath872 is a geometric random variable with parameter @xmath168 , for @xmath366 , where all @xmath873 are mutually independent . let @xmath697 denote the number of parts of size @xmath11 in a random integer partition of size @xmath0 . then : @xmath874 thus , one may treat both small and large part sizes as approximately independent , which was utilized in @xcite , for example , to resolve several conjectures for integer partitions involving statistics localized on the largest part sizes . pittel also showed in ( * ? ? ? * th . 1 ) , that if we include in the joint distribution of part sizes those parts which are at most @xmath875 , for some @xmath138 , then this joint distribution converges to a non - trivial limit which is the total variation distance between two appropriately defined normal distributions . however , total variation distance is a considerably strong metric , since one can take any measurable function of the random variables and the resulting total variation distance is guaranteed not to increase , whereas a limit shape is one particular statistic . thus , by a more detailed analysis of the component sizes , specifically for the limit shape statistic , pittel was able to show that the limit shape of random integer partitions is indeed close in probability to the limit shape @xmath265 indicated by the weaker notions of convergence , thus formally establishing the equivalence of ensembles . the reason why the weaker notion of the limit shape , i.e. , convergence in expectation of random - size partitions with independent part sizes , coincides with the strong notion of the limit shape , i.e. , convergence in probability of integer partitions of a fixed size , is due to the exponential concentration of the limit shape statistic . this has traditionally been handled either via a martingale technique , or via more direct methods like markov s inequality , and demonstrates an unsurprising exponential concentration around the expected value which could be considered implicit in the work of vershik @xcite . as noted in [ sect : ld ] , an ldp is not just an upper bound on the rate of exponential concentration , as is often all that is needed to prove the strong notion of a limit shape from the weak notion , it is also an asymptotic expression for the rate of concentration . while pittel s work proved the limit shape of unrestricted partitions , the large deviation results by dembo , vershik , and zeituni in @xcite provided the limit shape of integer partitions into distinct parts , and made their connection with the ldp explicit . in addition , ( * ? ? ? * section 6.2 ) states the form of the limit shape for partitions with restrictions of the form @xmath876 and provides the ldp for the _ independent _ process in both cases of unrestricted multiplicities and distinct part sizes . combining the ldp with classical asymptotic enumeration formulas , e.g. , those in for example @xcite , it is straightforward to derive the equivalence of ensembles under these restrictions via the inequality in equation . we have provided the ldp for the _ dependent _ process with bounded multiplicities , i.e. , the process governing random partitions of fixed size @xmath0 , in [ sect : ld ] . [ [ credit ] ] ~ it is difficult to credit limit shape results like theorem [ special unrestricted ] precisely , owing to the connection between asymptotic enumeration and concentration , and the precise conditions which are assumed and utilized . the weak form of the limit shape in theorem [ special unrestricted ] is easily calculated via the statistical models in khinchin @xcite , and more explicitly by kerov and vershik @xcite ; the same ones utilized by fristedt @xcite and pittel @xcite . the limit shape then follows by concentration and a local central limit theorem , or equivalently , asymptotic enumeration , via the inequality in equation ; see also @xcite . ingham ( * ? ? ? 2 ) provided quite general asymptotic enumeration formulas for partitions satisfying the following conditions : let @xmath877 denote the number of elements in @xmath235 less than or equal to @xmath878 . suppose there are constants @xmath879 , @xmath880 , and function @xmath881 such that @xmath882 and for some @xmath883 and @xmath884 we also have @xmath885 define @xmath886^{1/\beta}.\ ] ] then , _ as long as @xmath239 is monotonically increasing _ , we have @xmath887 similarly , under the slightly weaker assumption that @xmath888 and again assuming _ @xmath889 is monotonically increasing _ , with @xmath890 , we have @xmath891 erds and bateman in ( * ? ? 6 ) simplified the monotonically increasing assumption for @xmath239 to be more simply that the greatest common divisor of @xmath235 is 1 . it is unknown whether or not a corresponding condition exists for partitions into distinct parts , and it would be interesting to find such necessary and sufficient conditions . roth and szekeres provide a partial answer , at least one detailed enough for our purposes . they demand the elements @xmath243 satisfy more generally @xmath892 in addition , they also assume the following condition , which is sufficient for the asymptotic enumeration results to hold : @xmath893 ^ 2 \right\ } \to \infty \ \ { \rm as } \ \ k\to \infty,$}\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath894 $ ] denotes the closest integer to @xmath20 and the infinum is taken over @xmath895 $ ] . they also show that when @xmath7 is small , condition @xmath896 is not necessary . @xmath897 there are also several classes of sequences @xmath235 presented in the introduction in @xcite which cover many cases of interest ; namely , _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ * @xmath898 where @xmath899 is the @xmath198 prime number . * @xmath900 , where @xmath901 is a polynomial which takes only integral values for integral @xmath20 and has the property that corresponding to every prime @xmath902 there exists an integer @xmath20 such that @xmath903 . * @xmath904 , where @xmath901 is a polynomial which takes only integral values for integral @xmath20 and has the property that corresponding to every prime @xmath902 there exists an @xmath20 such that @xmath905 . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ in particular , they specialize their main theorem in the case when @xmath906 and @xmath243 satisfies ( ii ) , which prevents any gaps in @xmath244 ; this is theorem [ rothszekeres ] . we have dropped the final condition that for every prime @xmath902 there exists an integer @xmath20 such that @xmath903 , requiring instead that should such a @xmath902 exist then we take @xmath0 to infinity through multiples of the gcd of @xmath235 , as is required for the corresponding limit shape . one could also argue that theorem [ special unrestricted ] follows from pittel s analysis @xcite , in that it requires no new ideas other than generalizing the analysis appropriately . however , there are certain estimates utilized which must be carefully adapted , and a priori require some kind of technical conditions similar to the ones initially imposed by ingham and others . one may also be tempted to attribute theorem [ special unrestricted ] to dembo , vershik , and zeituni @xcite . in ( * section 6.2 ) , they state explicitly an ldp for an independent process of random variables , which is sufficient to prove concentration , but as stated the sequence @xmath235 consists of multiples of perfect powers . this is similar to the work in goh and hitczenko @xcite , whose extra technical assumption is the existence of four @xmath907 s which are relatively prime . canfield , corteel , and wilf @xcite provide all of the ingredients for theorem [ special unrestricted ] , even including the restriction that @xmath243 is the image of a polynomial , which is the special case we have adopted . [ [ section ] ] we have decided to describe the growth conditions on sets @xmath235 in terms of the growth of @xmath243 , where @xmath196 . meinardus @xcite , granovski , stark and erlihson @xcite , hwang @xcite , and bogachev @xcite , for example , impose conditions directly on the corresponding generating functions . yakubovich @xcite , goh and hitczenko @xcite , and ingham @xcite , on the other hand , have described growth conditions on the inverse function @xmath908 . our choice is natural for this setting since our sets of partitions and bijections have traditionally been written in the form of allowable part sizes . [ [ ingham form ] ] ~ the original form of the growth conditions in ingham s ( * ? ? ? * th . 2 ) is particularly elegant , even though it is not ideal for our setting . rather than requiring a condition on the greatest common divisor of allowable part sizes , the result is instead stated in terms of sums of partition numbers . formally , let @xmath239 denote the number of partitions of @xmath0 into parts from the set @xmath235 . ingham defines for real @xmath909 @xmath910 then , he proves an asymptotic result for @xmath911 _ and _ @xmath912 under the condition that @xmath913 is increasing for every fixed @xmath914 . when @xmath915 , we can choose @xmath916 . then , _ for every _ @xmath909 , the number @xmath913 is precisely one of @xmath917 for some @xmath918 , and , since @xmath919 , it thus captures the asymptotic rate of growth of @xmath239 , without needing to specify , as we have done , that @xmath23 through multiples of @xmath250 . [ [ section-1 ] ] the conditions of meinardus @xcite and yakubovich @xcite are related to condition , and apply more generally to partitions where each part size can have multiple versions ( for example , three different types of 1s ) . these conditions are used by hwang @xcite , for example , where the distribution of the number of summands ( taken without multiplicities ) follows a central and local limit theorem . there is also a central limit theorem proved by madritsch and wagner in @xcite , concerning partitions whose base-@xmath234 representation only contains digits from some given set . this type of condition is natural given the fact that the bits in a geometric random variable are independent , a property which was also exploited in , e.g. , @xcite for the purpose of random sampling of integer partitions . [ [ fixed : summands ] ] ~ the asymptotic number of partitions with part sizes restricted to be less than some @xmath920 , was studied by romik @xcite . the limit shape of the conjugate set of partitions , i.e. , the set of partitions with a fixed number of summands @xmath875 , was studied by yakubovich and vershik @xcite . this is another example , see [ romik : example ] , where a bijection involving conjugation is used to obtain the limit shape of a non - multiplicative set of restrictions . a more detailed saddle point analysis counting the number of partitions of @xmath0 into exactly @xmath436 summands under further restrictions like those in [ further : example : generalization ] are contained in @xcite . [ [ romik : mistake ] ] ~ another proof of theorem [ theorem diff d k ] appears in the last section of the unpublished preprint @xcite . this was used to obtain ( * ? ? ? * th . 1 ) . unfortunately , there appears to be a mistake , as the formula given for the limit shape does not have unit area . [ [ section-2 ] ] ~ in this paper we consider only @xmath260 , the uniform distribution ; see , however , @xcite for limit shapes under plancherel measure , and e.g. @xcite for other types of measures on partitions . [ [ natural : generalization ] ] ~ the next natural generalization of our theorems would be the one considered by canfield and wilf @xcite : partitions of size @xmath0 with part sizes in set @xmath235 and with multiplicities in set @xmath921 . in our setting @xmath922 , and in [ romik : example ] we have @xmath923 . it would be interesting to investigate conditions on @xmath921 and @xmath235 such that the limit shape exists . our approach does not extend to compute the limit shape for classes of partitions for which no bijection to andrews class partitions is known . one notable example is the partitions into powers of @xmath5 , which are equinumerous with certain _ cayley compositions _ ( see @xcite and ( * ? ? ? * http://oeis.org/a000123[a000123 ] ) ) . in this case the usual notion of a limit shape does not exist and an alternative notion is required . fristedt s method @xcite in section [ sect prob ] defines a random sampling algorithm for andrews class partitions of a fixed size @xmath0 . namely , we sample independent geometric random variables @xmath924 , where @xmath873 has parameter @xmath168 , @xmath703 , @xmath48 , and check whether @xmath925 , repeating the sampling of @xmath924 until the condition is satisfied . the expected number of times that we resample is given by @xmath926 , where @xmath927 an application of probabilistic divide - and - conquer ( pdc ) , introduced in @xcite , see also @xcite , uses von neumann s rejection sampling @xcite to obtain a speedup . the algorithm is to sample repeatedly from @xmath928 and @xmath235 , uniform on @xmath610 , until @xmath929 the expected number of times that we resample this procedure is @xmath930 , see ( * ? ? ? * table 1 ) , a considerable speedup . more generally , consider the set of partitions with parts in the set @xmath235 , where @xmath931 . the pdc deterministic second half algorithm to generate a random integer partition of size @xmath0 with parts in the set @xmath235 is to sample repeatedly rom @xmath932 and @xmath235 , uniform on @xmath610 , until @xmath933 the speedup in this case is given by @xmath934 hence , the expected number of rejections before a single accepted sample via the pdc deterministic second half algorithm is asymptotically @xmath935 . there are also bijections defined as linear transformations by corteel and savage @xcite , and corteel , savage , and wilf @xcite , which correspond to partitions which satisfy various inequality conditions on the part sizes , in a sense generalizing the set @xmath936 of partitions with nonnegative @xmath397 differences in section [ sect r ] . a further generalization was demonstrated by pak @xcite ; most of those examples involve sets @xmath235 where @xmath243 grows exponentially in @xmath58 , and so our theorems do not apply . of particular note is that our linear transformations are only assumed to act as markov operators on the diagram function , so it is not necessary that the coefficients of the matrix transformation @xmath332 each be nonnegative ; matrix @xmath332 simply needs to map positive coordinates to positive coordinates . for self - conjugate partitions , it would be interesting to define a coupling over the set of random variables governing the part sizes , although this has many apparent difficulties . we hope to return to this problem in the future . we showed earlier in remark [ vanishing : mass ] that the limit shape of @xmath268 under scaling function @xmath22 does not exist , since the scaled diagram function converges to @xmath939 for @xmath940 , which does not have unit area . the limit shape of @xmath357 exists and is equal to @xmath941 for @xmath942 . consider the ( non - bijective ) transformation @xmath943 , which sends partitions in @xmath268 to @xmath357 . even though there is a transformation , and each set of partitions tends to some limiting curve , there is no connection implied about the limit curves since the transformation is not even a bijection . the authors are grateful to ken alexander , richard arratia , quentin berger , amir dembo , alejandro morales , greta panova , dan romik , bruce rothschild , richard stanley and damir yeliussizov for helpful discussions . the second author was partially supported by the nsf . d. romik , identities arising from limit shapes of constrained random partitions ; preprint ( 2003 ) , 15 pp . ; available at . Abstract:

Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.

Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered . Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video . Paper: one of the most important aspects of string theory with potential applications to beyond - the - standard - model physics and cosmology is the existence of additional extended objects . a particularly interesting class of these , @xmath2-branes , occur as @xmath3-dimensional surfaces arising as supersymmetric solutions of the low - energy supergravity field equations but have also a high - energy interpretation as surfaces confining the endpoints of open strings @xcite . by now many different configurations of @xmath2-branes have been studied , including parallel and intersecting sets of branes @xcite , the combination of branes with different dimensionalities @xcite and also several possible embeddings in the compactified extra - dimensions @xcite . these models have an enormous potential in the construction of gauge theories with matter and several new extensions of the standard model have been obtained in this way @xcite . branes have also been intensively studied in their application to the problems of early universe cosmology , such as inflation and reheating . in the context of effective field theory treatments of brane - world model building , an immense amount of work has been performed on the astrophysical and cosmological implications of these theories for both flat and warped extra dimensions @xcite , while many studies in string theory have also been undertaken @xcite . one important property of @xmath2-branes is the fact that they interact at large distances via the exchange of closed string modes , which allows one to study them as massive point - like charged objects moving along the dimensions transverse to their world - volumes . an interesting application of this was proposed in @xcite , where it was shown that branes with opposite charges may form bound states similar to electron - positron states , despite the different origin of the central potentials involved . this analogy has motivated the name of _ branonium _ to designate this type of systems . several properties of these bound states have been analyzed in @xcite , including the classical orbits , the associated quantum dynamics and possible compactification schemes . this analysis assumed a probe ( anti)brane moving in the background spacetime created by a fixed central stack of branes , thus neglecting the gravitational backreaction of the probe . in the case of @xmath1-branes , the probe s trajectory follows closed elliptical orbits similar to those found in planetary systems . it was also suggested that the probe s motion would lead to radiation of particles into both the bulk space and the probe s world - volume , making otherwise stable orbits decay . the stability of this system was further studied in @xcite , where it was shown that orbital decay necessarily occurs when geometric moduli of the background spacetime are allowed to vary . in this work , we explore some properties of branonium systems , namely the mechanism leading to particle production in the world - volume of the probe brane . for the particular case of a scalar field living in the world - volume of a probe @xmath1-brane , we show that particle production may occur in a regime of parametric resonance similar to the one behind the phenomenon of preheating after inflation @xcite , leading to an exponential growth of the particle number in the probe s world - volume . we determine how the orbital parameters of the system constrain this mechanism and analyze the possible properties of the resonantly produced particles . also , we study how the probe s trajectory is modified by compactifying three of the dimensions parallel to the branes , so that a 4-dimensional spacetime with a flat friedmann - robertson - walker geometry is obtained . in this case , we analyze the effects of hubble expansion on the orbital parameters and how it modifies the parametric resonance regime . other instability sources such as radiation into bulk modes are discussed as well . we also consider the effects of transverse space compactification on the probe s motion in the case of a compact 3-torus and analyze the associated production of angular momentum . finally , we explore some of the cosmological applications of the resonant particle production mechanism and relate them to possible final configurations of the system , including stable states or brane - antibrane annihilation . in the next section , we begin by introducing some of the general properties of @xmath4 branonia , with particular emphasis on the @xmath5 case , and discuss the effects of hubble expansion on the orbital parameters . in section iii , we study the evolution of scalar particle - modes confined to the probe brane and analyze the properties of the associated parametric resonance mechanism in both the non - expanding and expanding universe cases . we distinguish between the production of massless and massive particles and determine the significance of energy damping into these modes on the probe s motion . we also consider , in this section , the effects of radiation into bulk modes on the resonant production of brane - bound particles . in section iv , we analyze how compactifying the directions transverse to the branes modifies the probe s trajectory and dynamically generates the required angular momentum . possible final states of the system are described in section v , where we also analyze the relevance of the particle production mechanism to cosmology in some particular scenarios . we summarize the main results and conclusions of this work in section vi . branonium corresponds , in its simplest form proposed in @xcite , to a system whose components are a fixed stack of @xmath6 parallel @xmath7-branes and a probe @xmath7-brane , parallel to the stack , whose gravitational backreaction is neglected so that it has no influence on the geometry of the background spacetime . let the coordinates @xmath8 , @xmath9 , correspond to the dimensions parallel to the stack and the coordinates @xmath10 , @xmath11 , correspond to those transverse to the branes . then , the general solution of the supergravity equations of motion in @xmath12 dimensions for @xmath6 parallel @xmath7-branes is given , in the einstein frame , by @xcite : [ eq1 ] ds^2&=&h^-dx_p^2+h^dy^2 , + e^&=&h^ , c_01p=(1-h^-1 ) , which give the @xmath12-dimensional metric , the dilaton @xmath13 and the non - vanishing components of the bulk @xmath3-form field @xmath14}$ ] which couples to the @xmath3-dimensional world - volume of the stack of branes . the harmonic function @xmath15 is a function of the radial coordinate in transverse space , @xmath16 , and has the form : [ eq2 ] h(r)=1+q_pr^ , where @xmath17 and the factor of @xmath18 ensures that the solution is asymptotically the @xmath12-dimensional minkowski space . for the cases we will be interested in studying , the transverse space is at least 2-dimensional , so that @xmath19 . the stack of branes is , thus , located at the origin in the transverse space . the exponents @xmath20 , @xmath21 , @xmath22 and the constant @xmath23 that characterize the solution are given by : [ eq3 ] & = & 4d(d-2 ) , = 4(d-2 ) , + & = & 2 , = 2 , where @xmath24 and [ eq4 ] = _ n^2 + 2dd-2 . the constant @xmath25 defines the coupling of the @xmath26-form field strength to the dilaton in the supergravity action . we will be interested in the particular case of @xmath2-branes in type ii supergravities , which arise as the low energy limit of type ii string theories , so that the @xmath27-form field strength corresponds to a closed string state in the ramond - ramond sector , and @xmath28 . taking @xmath29 , we have @xmath30 , @xmath31 , @xmath32 , @xmath33 , @xmath34 and @xmath35 . it is clear that the condition @xmath19 implies @xmath36 . the constant @xmath37 is related to the charge carried by the stack of @xmath6 branes , and for the case of @xmath2-branes we have [ eq5 ] q_p = c_pg_snl_s^ , where @xmath38 , @xmath39 is the string length and @xmath40 is the string coupling constant . this solution holds in the limit of validity of string perturbation theory and for small curvature , which allows a low energy description of the system in terms of supergravity fields . this approximation is valid as long as the local string coupling , @xmath41 , is everywhere small . also , we need to require the radial coordinate @xmath42 , which will give the distance between the probe and the stack branes , to be large compared to the string length @xmath39 , so that mediation by supergravity bulk fields ( graviton , dilaton and rr - forms ) is the dominant source of brane interactions . before analyzing the motion of the probe brane , we need to consider possible compactifications of the 10 dimensional spacetime that yield our 4-dimensional world at low energies . compactification of dimensions parallel and transverse to the world volume of the branes involve different procedures . in the case of dimensions parallel to the branes , it suffices to consider the kaluza - klein _ ansatz_. if we start with the @xmath12-dimensional spacetime eq . ( [ eq1 ] ) and compactify along a periodic coordinate @xmath43 with radius @xmath44 , so that the branes are wrapped around this dimension , we obtain a @xmath45-dimensional spacetime with metric given by @xcite : [ eq6 ] ds_d^2&=&e^2ds_d^2+e^2(dz+b_dx^)^2 , + ds_d^2&=&h^-dx_p^2+h^dy^2 , + e^&=&h^ , where [ eq7 ] & = & 12(d-1)(d-2 ) , = -(d-2 ) , + & = & 2(d-2 ) , + &=&-2 , =+2 . the dilaton field @xmath13 is not altered by this compactification , while the @xmath46-form rr field can be decomposed as follows : [ eq8 ] c_[n-1]=b_[n-1]+b_[n-2]dz . we take the following truncation of these fields : [ eq9 ] b_[n-1]=0 , ( b_[n-2])_01p-1=(1-h^-1 ) . this truncation leads to a @xmath47-brane supergravity solution in @xmath48 dimensions , characterized by the same harmonic function of the transverse space radial coordinate @xmath15 . applying this _ toroidal compactification _ procedure @xmath49 times we obtain @xmath50-brane solutions living in a @xmath51-dimensional spacetime , with the number of transverse dimensions remaining the same . the process of compactifying the dimensions transverse to the branes is not as straightforward due to the lack of translational invariance which results from the presence of the branes . in particular , to make a given transverse coordinate @xmath52 periodic , so that a similar kaluza - klein mechanism can be applied , one needs to include the appropriate image branes " of the source branes which will ensure the invariance of the configuration under @xmath53 , @xmath54 being the radius of the compact dimension . for example , if a source brane is located at @xmath55 , an image brane has to be considered at @xmath56 . this implies a generalization of the harmonic function in eq . ( [ eq2 ] ) to include branes located at different points in transverse space @xcite : [ eq10 ] h()=1+_iq_p|-|^ , where the vectors @xmath57 denote the positions of the different image branes and @xmath58 . these two compactification schemes allow us to reduce a 10-dimensional solution of the supergravity field equations to a 4-dimensional spacetime which resembles our world . we will be interested in studying a particular case of the general branonium configuration described so far where we have a source stack of d6-branes and also a probe @xmath1 brane . as was shown in @xcite , when the probe carries an antibrane charge , i.e. opposite to the charge of the source branes , the system yields closed elliptical orbits which can be solved analytically , while for other values of @xmath36 the orbits fail to close . this feature has , as we will describe later on , important consequences for particle production in the world - volume of the probe . compactifying 3 of the dimensions parallel to the branes , we obtain effective d3-branes moving in a 3-dimensional transverse space , the shape of the orbits not being affected by this toroidal compactification scheme as mentioned before . if the transverse dimensions are finite but their typical size is much larger than that of the compact parallel dimensions and the interbrane distance , we may consider them to be infinite and neglect the brane images described before . although this would correspond to a 7-dimensional spacetime , from the point of view of fields confined to the world - volume of the source and probe branes it is effectively 4-dimensional . the dynamics in the transverse space will , nevertheless , affect the 4-dimensional dynamics of the fields . in order to make the system more similar to the observable universe , we consider a modification of the solution eq . ( 1 ) so that , after compactification of 3 of the parallel dimensions , the 4-dimensional world - volume of the branes has a flat friedmann - robertson - walker ( frw ) geometry . this is a particular case of the the system studied in @xcite , where the moduli governing the size of both parallel and transverse dimensions were allowed to vary . in this work , we will assume that some dynamical mechanism at the string scale ( see , e.g. @xcite ) or at some other high - energy scale ( such as susy breaking ) fixes all moduli except the scale factor associated with the 3 non - compact dimensions parallel to the branes . hence , in the einstein frame , the complete 7-dimensional line element is given by : [ eq11 ] ds_7 ^ 2=h^-_4[-dt^2+a^2_ijdx^idx^j]+h^_4_mndy^mdy^n , where @xmath59 , @xmath60 and @xmath61 . the harmonic function is in this case @xmath62 . the exponents @xmath63 and @xmath64 can be obtained using eq . ( [ eq3 ] ) and applying eq . ( [ eq7 ] ) for the compactification on a 3-torus , but their precise values will not be necessary in the subsequent calculations . the motion of the probe brane is described by its action , which is divided in two parts . the born - infeld contribution , which concerns the geometry of the world volume and possible gauge fields living on it , is in the string frame given by , for a generic @xmath7-brane probe @xcite : [ eq12 ] s_bi =- t_pd^p+1 e^- , where @xmath65 are world - volume coordinates , @xmath66 gives the @xmath7-brane tension and @xmath67 is the induced metric on the probe . the hatted metric tensor is defined in the string frame , and is related to the einstein frame one via @xmath68 with @xmath69 in the general case . the antisymmetric field strength tensor @xmath70 refers to gauge fields describing open string modes with endpoints on the probe ( in the case of dirichlet branes ) , but in what follows we will set these fields to zero . the wess - zumino part of the action describes the minimal coupling of the ramond - ramond @xmath3-form to the @xmath3-world volume of the probe brane and can be written as @xcite : [ eq13 ] s_wz =- qt_pc_[p+1 ] . the constant @xmath71 gives the sign of the charge of the probe brane , which being a bps saturated state is equal or opposite to the brane tension @xmath66 , so that @xmath72 corresponds to a brane and @xmath73 corresponds to an antibrane @xcite . if we now consider the particular case of d6 branes in 10 dimensions , compactifying 3 of the parallel dimensions and including the scale factor describing the expansion ( or contraction ) of the 3 remaining non - compact dimensions along the brane , and choose the world - volume coordinates such that @xmath74 , we arrive at the following expression for the total action of the probe brane : [ eq14 ] s_4=-t_6v_3d^4x a^3(t ) , where @xmath75 gives the volume of the compact 3-torus around which the d6-branes are wrapped to give the effective 4-dimensional space . we have assumed that the transverse space coordinates are exclusively time - dependent , @xmath76 and defined the velocity of the probe as @xmath77 , with dots denoting time derivatives . as mentioned before , the bound orbits of the probe brane can be exactly solved for the case where the scale factor is constant and it was shown in @xcite that they correspond to closed ellipses . we now wish to analyze the effects of the varying scale factor on these orbits . in this case , a full analytical solution is hard to obtain and it is simpler to consider the evolution of the system when the probe brane moves at larges distances from the stack with small velocities . these two conditions can be expressed as @xmath78 . one must recall that we considered initially that the transverse dimensions can be considered infinite in extent . hence , our analysis will hold as long as the radial coordinate is large compared to the typical length scale of the harmonic function , given by @xmath79 ( assumed larger than the string scale and the compactification scale ) , but still much smaller than the typical size of the transverse dimensions ( assumed much larger than @xmath79 ) . with this hierarchy in mind , we may expand the probe brane s action to obtain , to lowest order , [ eq15 ] s_4-t_6v_3d^4x a^3(t ) . our subsequent analysis will not be affected by the constant term and we may drop it . for a probe antibrane , [ eq16 ] s_4t_6v_3d^4x a^3(t ) . the rotational symmetry of the problem implies that the probe s trajectory will be confined to a plane , which we may choose to be @xmath80 . then , we may define the canonically normalized complex scalar field [ eq17 ] ( y^1+iy^2 ) , so that its action is , in the non - relativistic and large distance limit , [ eq18 ] s_=d^4x a^3(t)(-g^__^*-v ( ) ) , where @xmath81 is the 4-dimensional flat frw metric of the spacetime where the field is defined and the potential is given by : [ eq19 ] v()=2t_6v_3h^-12t_6v_3(1- ) , so that it only depends on @xmath82 . note that in writing the action in this form one must take into account that the spatial derivatives of the field , @xmath83 , @xmath84 , are assumed to vanish , i.e. the probe brane should remain parallel to the source branes during its motion . the analysis of the classical motion of the probe brane is in this way reexpressed as a classical field theory problem of a complex scalar field in the background of a flat frw spacetime . before deriving the equations of motion for the field @xmath85 , it is useful to consider some of the symmetries of the action . first , the rotational symmetry of the problem in the plane transverse to the branes is associated with a conserved angular momentum . in terms of the field theory approach , this corresponds to the global u(1 ) invariance of the action under @xmath86 , where @xmath87 is a constant . the associated noether current induces a conserved charge which gives , in the quantum theory , the particle number operator associated with the field . writing the field as @xmath88 and defining the comoving angular momentum as @xmath89 , the comoving particle number density is given by : [ eq20 ] n = i(^*-^*)=2 ^ 2=2l , while the total particle number , which corresponds to the conserved noether charge , is given by @xmath90 . the energy density and pressure of the field can be obtained from its energy - momentum tensor , yielding : [ eq21 ] & & t_00=||^2+v()=^2+l^2 ^ 2+v ( ) , + p & & t_iia^2=||^2-v()=^2+l^2 ^ 2-v ( ) . the covariant conservation of the energy - momentum tensor can then be expressed as @xmath91 , where the energy of the field is defined as @xmath92 and @xmath93 is the volume of the expanding ( or contracting ) flat frw spacetime . defining the hubble parameter @xmath94 , we can write this in the form : [ eq22 ] ddt=-3h(+p ) . from eqs . ( [ eq21 ] ) and ( [ eq22 ] ) we conclude that @xmath95 , the equality holding only for @xmath96 . thus , in an expanding universe ( @xmath97 ) , the system evolves with a strictly decreasing energy density . the angular momentum evolves according to : [ eq23 ] dldt+3hl=0 , which corresponds to conservation of the total particle number @xmath6 . hence , in an expanding universe , the absolute value of the angular momentum will necessarily decrease , vanishing asymptotically . we , thus , conclude from this simple analysis of conservation laws that the expansion of the universe will make the system reduce both its energy density and its angular momentum . to analyze the details of this evolution , we need to determine the equations of motion for the field @xmath85 . varying the action eq . ( [ eq18 ] ) with respect to @xmath98 , and taking this variation to vanish , we obtain : [ eq24 ] + 3h+v(||)^*=0 . in terms of the transverse space coordinates @xmath10 , @xmath99 , this can be written as : [ eq25 ] y^m+3hy^m+2q_6y^mr^3=0 . this implies that the polar variables @xmath100 and @xmath101 satisfy : [ eq26 ] & + 3h - l^2 ^ 3 + 12 ^ 2=0 , + & + 2 + 3h=0 , where we have defined the constant [ eq27 ] 4q_6(t_6v_32)^3/2 , so that , apart from constant factors , the large distances potential is @xmath102 . it is easy to check that the equation for @xmath101 simply gives the evolution of the angular momentum that we obtained previously in eq . ( [ eq23 ] ) . the evolution of the radial field @xmath100 is determined by the form of the hubble parameter , given by the energy density content of the universe via the friedmann equation in the usual way . this may include not only the energy density of the field @xmath85 but also all other matter , radiation or vacuum energy components . the possibility that this scalar field may drive ( slow - roll ) inflation if , in the early universe , it dominates the energy density has been analyzed in @xcite , for the case where the probe brane moves in a linear trajectory , i.e. @xmath103 . it was shown that the interbrane potential arising from type ii supergravity / string theories is not flat enough to produce the required number of e - foldings , exhibiting an @xmath104-problem " . this is intrinsically related to the assumption that @xmath42 is much smaller than the size of the transverse dimensions . an inflationary period driven by the angular field variable @xmath101 was proposed in @xcite , where it is argued that , despite having a flat potential , this field may provide the constant energy density necessary for inflation if the probe brane moves in a circular orbit with @xmath105 . however , we need to take into account the fact that , during inflation , the angular momentum decays exponentially as @xmath106 , from eq . ( [ eq23 ] ) . the system will hence quickly tend to the @xmath103 case , where sufficient inflation is difficult to obtain . furthermore , the decay of the angular momentum will necessarily alter the evolution of @xmath100 and the value of @xmath107 , so that a slow - roll inflationary mechanism with the probe brane moving in a circular orbit would be hard to construct - branes moving in warped throats @xcite . in particular , the important role of the angular variables in providing accelerated periods of expansion was discussed in @xcite . ] . although we do not wish to completely discard such inflationary mechanisms , we will from now on assume that some other field is responsible for inflation and analyze how the compactified @xmath108 branonium system evolves in the post - inflationary eras . before analyzing in detail the effects of the expansion on the trajectory of the probe , let us recall the general bound orbits of the system in a non - expanding universe . in this case , the system reduces to the well - known problem of a particle in a central @xmath109 attractive potential , admitting closed orbit solutions of the form : [ eq28 ] ( ) = r(1-e^2)1+e . these are closed ellipses with eccentricity and semi - major axis given by : [ eq29 ] e&=&(1 + 4l^2 ^ 2)^12 , + r&=&-2 . the properties of such orbits may be obtained by studying the effective potential @xmath110 . this potential has a minimum at @xmath111 , tends to @xmath112 at the origin and to zero at large distances . the condition @xmath113 then implies that orbits with @xmath114 will be bounded , with @xmath115 . in this case , @xmath100 will oscillate between its minimum and maximum values , @xmath116 and @xmath117 , which can be obtained from eq . ( [ eq28 ] ) by setting @xmath118 and @xmath119 , respectively . at the minimum of @xmath120 , the orbits will be circular with @xmath121 , and @xmath122 . for @xmath123 , the orbits will only be bounded from below with e.g. @xmath124 for @xmath125 , which corresponds to an @xmath126 parabolic orbit . the linear trajectory , with @xmath103 , is a particular case of the latter with no bounds on the value of @xmath100 except for the trivial @xmath127 . for @xmath128 , the orbits are hyperbolic . consider now the expanding case with the scale factor evolving as @xmath129 . this power law behavior is typical of the post - inflationary stages of the universe s evolution , where one may consider a single fluid to give the dominant contribution to the total energy density . for example , in the radiation era we have @xmath130 and in the matter era @xmath131 . we can also take @xmath131 at the end of inflation , when the oscillations of the inflaton about the minimum of its potential , with an equation of state corresponding to that of non - relativistic matter , dominate the energy density . this model only holds away from the transitions between these periods as in these cases at least two of the components give similar contributions to the energy density . we will consider the evolution of the branonium system for arbitrary @xmath87 , starting at some instant @xmath132 when the scale factor has a value @xmath133 . the hubble parameter is then of the form @xmath134 , which implies from eq . ( [ eq23 ] ) that the angular momentum evolves according to : [ eq30 ] l = l_0(tt_0)^-3 , with @xmath135 being its initial value . it is then clear that @xmath136 as @xmath137 , as we have mentioned earlier . the equation for the radial field @xmath100 can now be written as : [ eq31 ] + 3t - l_0 ^ 2 ^ 3(tt_0)^-6 + 12 ^ 2=0 . let us start by analyzing how the system evolves when placed initially in a would - be circular orbit , so that [ eq32 ] ( t_0)=2l_0 ^ 2_c0 , as @xmath138 . it is easy to see that @xmath100 can not remain constant for @xmath139 due to the decay of the angular momentum . we may , however , look for solutions where the condition for circular orbits is maintained during the motion of the probe brane , i.e. [ eq33 ] ( t)=2l^2(t)=_c0(tt_0)^-6_c(t ) . substituting into eq . ( [ eq31 ] ) we obtain [ eq34 ] _ c0t_0 ^ 2(tt_0)^-6 - 26(3 + 1)=0 , which is satisfied only in the non - expanding case , @xmath140 , and for @xmath141 . as we are interested in cases where @xmath142 , we conclude that @xmath143 is not an exact solution of the equations of motion . it is , however , an approximate solution at late times and , as we will check later , gives the global evolution of the system in an expanding universe , so that it is useful to consider some of its properties . in particular , the angular frequency evolves as : [ eq35 ] _ c = l_c^2(tt_0)^9 , so that the orbital period decreases as @xmath144 . such a solution eventually fails to satisfy the non - relativistic and large distance approximation as the radius of the orbit decreases and its angular velocity grows . in particular , the parameter @xmath145 which controls this approximation grows , for @xmath146 , as [ eq36 ] hv^2(t_6v_3)^4(q_6l_0)^4(tt_0)^12 . hence , given the values of @xmath147 and @xmath75 , it is the ratio @xmath148 that controls how long the approximations remain valid . consider now trajectories with a non - vanishing initial eccentricity . in an expanding universe , the effective potential becomes time - dependent , although its asymptotic properties at the origin and at infinity remain the same . as the angular momentum redshifts away , the minimum of the effective potential decreases , the same happening with the value of @xmath100 at this minimum , according to the circular solution defined in eq . ( [ eq33 ] ) . as discussed earlier , the energy density of the field always decreases during the motion of the probe brane in an expanding universe . hence , if the system is initially in one of the closed orbits with @xmath149 , the latter condition will be satisfied for all @xmath139 . this means that , at all times , the probe brane will be in one of the closed elliptical orbits defined earlier . from eq . ( [ eq29 ] ) , we also conclude that the semi - major axis of the orbit will decrease as the energy density evolves to more negative values . the eccentricity of the orbits may , however , not remain constant , as it depends on the variation of both the energy density and the angular momentum . in fact , using eqs . ( [ eq22 ] ) and ( [ eq23 ] ) , one can show that the eccentricity varies according to [ eq37 ] de^2dt=-12hl^2 ^ 2(3+p)=-24hl^2 ^ 2(2t+v ) . where we defined the kinetic energy of the field as @xmath150 , so that @xmath151 and @xmath152 . thus , in an expanding universe , for finite @xmath135 , one expects the eccentricity of the orbit to vary unless @xmath153 . this last condition is satisfied on average in the non - expanding case , corresponding to the virial theorem . it does not necessarily hold , however , in an expanding universe , with the semi - major axis of the orbits decaying as discussed above . it is nevertheless clear that , at late times , as @xmath107 and @xmath154 decrease , the variation of the eccentricity of the orbits should be smaller . the sign of @xmath155 is also not definite , so that the eccentricity may either increase or decrease during the motion of the probe brane . from eqs . ( [ eq29 ] ) and ( [ eq33 ] ) , we obtain : [ eq38 ] r(t)=_c(t)1-e^2(t ) . hence , the variation of the semi - major axis follows the decrease of the circular solution obtained earlier , being also affected by the variation of the eccentricity . in order to have a better understanding of the evolution of the probe brane s motion in an expanding universe , we have solved the equations of motion numerically . measuring all quantities in terms of the string length , i.e. setting @xmath156 , we choose , as an example , the values @xmath157 and @xmath158 we follow the example analyzed in @xcite . ] . we set the initial conditions at @xmath159 to be those of a non - expanding elliptical orbit with angular momentum @xmath135 and eccentricity @xmath160 , which we take to be the only free orbital parameters . the field is initially at its maximum value @xmath161 , with @xmath162 and @xmath119 . after determining the numerical solution for @xmath163 , we computed the corresponding energy density and eccentricity evolution , according to eqs . ( [ eq21 ] ) and ( [ eq29 ] ) , respectively . we used the numerical solution for the eccentricity to compute @xmath164 , according to eq . ( [ eq38 ] ) , and also the maximum and minimum values of @xmath163 at each orbit , given by : [ eq39 ] _ min(t)&=&r(t)(1-e(t ) ) , + _ max(t)&=&r(t)(1+e(t ) ) . we have also determined the evolution of the angular field variable @xmath101 using @xmath165 . in figure 1 we have plotted the results obtained for the values @xmath166 and @xmath167 in a matter - dominated universe , @xmath131 , with @xmath168 . seems quite large , one must take into account that it is measured in units of the string time , which is of order @xmath169 seconds if the string scale is of the order of the planck scale . thus , we are considering the probe brane to be moving quite early in the history of the universe . ] and @xmath167 in a matter - dominated universe , @xmath131 , with @xmath168 . the plots show ( a ) the radial field and associated quantities , ( b ) the energy density , ( c ) the eccentricity and ( d ) the motion of the probe brane in the complex plane of the field @xmath85.,title="fig : " ] [ fig : figure_1 ] observing the plots shown in this figure , we conclude that , as expected , the probe brane evolves continually through elliptical orbits of decreasing semi - major axis , so that they fail to close . the radial field then oscillates between minimum and maximum values which decrease in time . the global decrease follows that of the circular solution , eq . ( [ eq33 ] ) , but exhibits an oscillating behavior associated with the variation of the energy density . although the latter strictly decreases , as expected , it also oscillates with decreasing period and amplitude , so that at later stages its evolution tends to be smooth . consequently , one observes oscillations in the evolution of the eccentricity of the orbit . in the example shown in figure 1 , these oscillations have a small amplitude . however , at earlier times , when the effects of hubble expansion are more significant , numerical simulations show that this amplitude can be quite large . all simulations show that @xmath170 starts increasing and , as the period and amplitude of the oscillations decay , it tends to a constant value . a constant eccentricity at late times implies that , in this limit , the energy density should , on average , vary as [ eq40 ] l^-2(t)(tt_0)^6 , tending smoothly to more negative values as observed in figure 1 . then , from eq . ( [ eq22 ] ) , [ eq41 ] = -3h=6h , so that @xmath171 or , equivalently , @xmath172 . thus , although at early times the effect of the expansion makes the eccentricity vary significantly , at late times the system _ virializes _ and starts evolving smoothly between orbits of constant eccentricity and decaying radius . this result will be useful later for studying particle production in the probe brane at late times . another interesting consequence of the expansion of the universe is a rotation of the axis of the elliptical orbits with time , although this is a small effect in the example shown in figure 1 . this is simply a result of the growing eccentricity of the orbits which deviates the maximum and minimum values of @xmath100 from @xmath119 and @xmath118 , respectively . the orbital axis will , however , stabilize at late times , as @xmath170 tends to a constant value . numerically , one also observes a decrease in the amplitude of the oscillations of @xmath163 . this is given by [ eq42 ] ( t)_max(t)-_min(t)=r(t)e(t ) , so that the observed decay of the amplitude is mainly due to the decrease of @xmath164 as discussed above . the asymptotic value of the eccentricity depends not only on the initial time @xmath132 at which the probe starts its motion but also on the initial values of the orbital angular momentum and eccentricity . numerical simulations show that larger values of @xmath135 lead to a more pronounced growth of the eccentricity , in agreement with eq . ( [ eq37 ] ) . the dependence on @xmath160 is less trivial and numerically one finds a larger eccentricity variation for @xmath160 close to 0 and to @xmath173 . this is , however , very small for @xmath160 close to 1 , which is expected , as the energy density of the field can not increase to produce hyperbolic orbits with @xmath174 if initially @xmath149 . the eccentricity always grows if initially @xmath105 , so that @xmath175 and @xmath176 , as most of the eccentricity variation occurs initially when hubble expansion is more significant . the opposite behavior should be observed if initially @xmath177 . although the example we have shown refers to a matter - dominated universe , @xmath131 , our qualitative discussion and analytical results hold for all @xmath142 , in particular to the @xmath130 radiation - dominated universe . to summarize the results of this section , we conclude that , in an expanding universe , the probe brane follows elliptical orbits with decreasing radius and increasing frequency and whose eccentricity exhibits an oscillating behavior and asymptotically tends to a constant value larger than the initial one . if the motion of the probe brane begins at late times with a small angular momentum , the latter effect is negligible . the probe brane will asymptotically collide with the branes in the stack , as @xmath178 , but our approximations will break down before this happens , so that we expect the motion of the probe brane to deviate significantly from our previous results as its angular velocity grows and it spirals towards the central stack . the collision will , however , occur if nothing else prevents the probe from losing energy and angular momentum as the universe expands , and may lead to the annihilation of the probe antibrane with one of the source branes . for now , we will use the results obtained in this section to study the production of particles in the probe brane and we will return to this issue in section v of this work . in the original discussion of the branonium system @xcite , it was argued that the fields confined to the probe brane , such as the gauge fields mentioned earlier , become time - dependent due to the motion of the probe through the background spacetime created by the central stack . consequently , an observer bound to the probe interprets this variation as corresponding to the production of particles associated with these fields . such radiation of energy into brane particle - modes arises only if the distance between the probe and the stack varies in time , thus creating a time - dependent background from the point of view of brane - bound observers . although the power radiated into these modes was estimated in @xcite , many aspects of this particle production mechanism remain unclear . in this section , we will analyze this mechanism in more detail , revealing some new properties of particle production in branonium , and discuss how the expansion of the universe modifies this process . the fields confined to the brane arise , from the string theory point of view , as states associated with open strings whose endpoints are attached to the brane , as discussed earlier . for a single @xmath7-brane , which is a @xmath179 bps supersymmetric state , these include bosonic fields such as gauge bosons and scalar fields , as well as their fermionic superpartners . if the probe corresponds itself to a stack of @xmath180 parallel @xmath7-branes , other degrees of freedom associated with a @xmath181 vector supermultiplet may arise @xcite . here , we will study the simplest case of a real scalar field @xmath104 confined to the probe brane and follow an effective field theory approach . for the @xmath108 system described earlier , we write the effective action for the scalar field @xmath104 in the form : [ eq43 ] s_=-t_6d^7 e^-(-12^__-12m^2 ^ 2 ) , where @xmath182 denotes the mass of the scalar field , which includes its bare mass as well as quantum corrections , and all other quantities are those defined earlier in this work . when compactifying 3 of the dimensions parallel to the brane as before , the scalar field will be decomposed in its kaluza - klein ( kk ) modes , leading to a tower of 4-dimensional massive modes , or kk states . we will focus on the evolution of the zero mode of the field @xmath104 , whose mass will simply be given by @xmath182 . to simplify the notation , we will denote this mode as @xmath104 , although one must bear in mind that it is not the original 7-dimensional field . the global factor of @xmath147 will not affect our discussion and we may absorb it into the definition of the field . first , let us consider the case @xmath183 . then , the classical equations of motion arising from the action eq . ( [ eq43 ] ) are given by : [ eq44 ] _ ( e^-^_)=0 . using the results obtained in section ii , and defining the function @xmath184^{1\over2}$ ] , we can write this as [ eq45 ] + ( 3h - f)-1a^2(1-hv^2)^2=0 , where @xmath185 and @xmath186 is the flat 3-dimensional laplacian of the field . to construct the associated quantum description , we follow the semi - classical approach to the quantization of scalar fields in curved space @xcite . in a curved background spacetime with a time - varying geometry , as is the case of the world - volume of the probe brane , the induced time - variation of the fields modifies the usual canonical quantization procedure , as the quantum operators become themselves time - dependent . in particular , the creation and annihilation operators associated with the field will now evolve in time as the background changes , the same happening with the associated multi - particle states . this is the main reason behind the production of particles in a dynamical background . let us start by expanding the field in fourier modes of the form : [ eq46 ] ( , t)=(a__(t)e^i+ a^_^*_(t)e^-i ) . in the quantum theory , @xmath187 and @xmath188 become the annihilation and creation operators associated with the fourier mode @xmath189 of the field . expanding the field in this way , we include all the time dependence of the field in the functions @xmath190 and @xmath191 , while the operators remain time - independent . the conjugate momentum to the field @xmath104 , obtained by computing @xmath192 , can then be written as [ eq47 ] ( , t)=a^3f(a__e^i+ a^_^*_e^-i ) . if the creation and annihilation operators satisfy the canonical commutation relations [ eq48 ] [ a_,a_]=[a^_,a^_]=0 , [ a_,a^_]=^3(- ) , then the canonical commutators for the field and its conjugate momentum , @xmath193=i\delta^3(\mathbf{x}-\mathbf{y})$ ] , can only be obtained if the mode functions satisfy the following wronskian normalization condition : [ eq49 ] _ ^*_-^*__=ifa^3 . this condition is essential for consistency of the quantization procedure . we now follow a semi - classical approach and consider the evolution of the field modes to be given by the classical equations of motion , assuming that any quantum corrections to their propagation can be neglected . substituting eq . ( [ eq46 ] ) into eq . ( [ eq45 ] ) , we see that each of the fourier modes evolves independently according to [ eq50 ] _ + ( 3h - f)_+k^2a^2(1-hv^2)_=0 . and similarly for the complex conjugate modes @xmath194 . notice that this equation depends only on @xmath195 but not the direction of the momenta @xmath196 . this is a consequence of the isotropy of our metric _ ansatz _ , and we may write without loss of generality @xmath197 . it is also clear , from eq . ( [ eq50 ] ) , that the physical momentum of the modes is related to their comoving momentum @xmath198 via [ eq51 ] k_phys = ka . this expression includes both the expected redshift of the modes in an expanding universe and the effect of the probe s motion through the dynamical background . let us now rescale the field modes by defining the mode functions @xmath199 . these satisfy [ eq52 ] _ k+_k^2x_k=0 , which corresponds to the equation for a harmonic oscillator with a variable frequency given by : [ eq53 ] _ k^2&=&k^2a^2(1-hv^2)-14(3h - f)^2 - 12(3h - f)= + & = & k_phys^2+^2 , where we have defined [ eq54 ] ^2(t)-14(3h - f)^2 - 12(3h - f ) . as each mode behaves as a harmonic oscillator , we can define the associated particle number via [ eq55 ] e_k&=&12|x_k|^2 + 12_k^2|x_k|^2=_k(n_k+12 ) + n_k&=&_k2(|x_k|^2_k^2+|x_k|^2)-12 . it is well known that this quantity is an adiabatic invariant for a harmonic oscillator with variable frequency , as happens , for example , in an oscillating pendulum whose length is decreased infinitely slowly @xcite . thus , the number of _ quanta _ in a given fourier mode @xmath198 can only change if its frequency varies in a non - adiabatic way , which can be expressed by the following condition @xcite : [ eq56 ] |d_kdt|_k^2 . for our particular case , this gives , in the limit @xmath78 , [ eq57 ] |hk_phys^2-|(k_phys^2+^2)^32 . this condition will then constrain the number of particles produced in each physical momentum mode by the motion of the probe brane . to quantify this number of particles , we need to look for solutions of the mode equation , eq . ( [ eq52 ] ) . we will start by discussing what happens in a non - expanding universe and then we will analyze the effects of hubble expansion on particle production . consider the motion of the probe brane in a non - expanding universe , @xmath96 , and assume that the non - relativistic and large distance approximations discussed earlier are valid . as we have seen in section ii , the probe follows closed elliptical trajectories if its energy ( density ) is negative , @xmath149 . if @xmath78 , we have to leading order : [ eq58 ] 1-hv^21 , k_physk , fh^1/2 . then , we may take the following approximations : [ eq59 ] f&=&ff , + f&&12 , so that we can write : [ eq60 ] ^2=-14f^2 + 12f-516(hh)^2 + 14hh . an exact analytical expression for the time variation of the radial field @xmath163 can be obtained in a non - expanding universe , being given implicitly by [ eq61 ] ( t)=r . the angular variable @xmath200 satisfies [ eq62 ] t - t_0=^-1 , where @xmath201 and @xmath202 is the angular frequency of the orbit . the angular variables @xmath203 and @xmath101 are related by : [ eq63 ] = . for small eccentricity orbits , @xmath204 , eq . ( [ eq62 ] ) gives , to leading order in @xmath205 : [ eq64 ] _ 0+(t - t_0 ) . choosing @xmath206 we have , in this approximation , [ eq65 ] ( t)r . this allows us to determine the non - relativistic and large distance expression for @xmath207 , in the case of small eccentricity orbits . to lowest order , we then obtain : [ eq66 ] ^2e^2((t - t_0 ) ) . defining [ eq67 ] ^2e^2 , the variable frequency of the mode with comoving momentum @xmath198 can , hence , be approximated by : [ eq68 ] _ k^2(t)k^2+^2((t - t_0 ) ) . if we now rewrite eq . ( [ eq52 ] ) in terms of the rescaled time variable @xmath208 , we obtain : [ eq69 ] x^_k+(a_k-2q(2z))x_k=0 , where [ eq70 ] a_k , q-2 ^ 2 ^ 2 . ( [ eq69 ] ) has the form of the well - known mathieu equation @xcite with parameters @xmath209 and @xmath71 determined by the orbital parameters of the probe brane and by the value of the comoving momentum @xmath198 of each mode . in the parameter space @xmath210 , the mathieu equation exhibits both stable and unstable solutions , the latter being closely associated with the phenomenon of parametric resonance @xcite . as we are working under the assumption that the probe brane s orbit has a large radius and a small eccentricity , it is easy to check that @xmath211 ( the analysis is independent of the sign of @xmath71 ) . in this region of parameter space , the mathieu equation exhibits instabilities in a series of narrow resonance bands near @xmath212 , with @xmath27 being a positive integer , and with a width in comoving momentum space approximately given by @xmath213 . in these resonance bands , the solution evolves as @xmath214 , with a real exponent @xmath215 , according to floquet s theorem . the most important of these is the first resonance band , which occurs when [ eq71 ] 1-|q|-18q^2a_k1+|q|-18q^2 . the exponent @xmath216 can then be approximately written as [ eq72 ] _ k . this is , as claimed , real for @xmath217 , having a maximum value of @xmath218 for @xmath219 . this implies that particle - modes lying inside this resonance band will be exponentially amplified , leading to a resonant production of particles . thus , from eq . ( [ eq70 ] ) , the center of the resonance band occurs for comoving momentum @xmath220 , while its lower and upper bounds are given by [ eq73 ] k_min&&k_c , + k_max&&k_c , so that the resonance band has a width in comoving momentum space of @xmath221 . this is quite small compared to the value of the center of the resonance , as @xmath222 , which means that particle production occurs in a regime of narrow parametric resonance . the particles produced by this mechanism have typical energies of order @xmath223 , i.e. with half the typical energy of the field @xmath85 . this agrees with the discussion in @xcite , where it is stated that particles are produced in pairs with opposite momenta , as if resulting directly from the decay of the interbrane distance field - particles ensures momentum conservation . ] . we have found in this work , however , that these particles are produced resonantly , the associated field modes being exponentially amplified . after the modes inside the resonance band have been amplified sufficiently , we may write , from eq . ( [ eq55 ] ) , [ eq74 ] n_ke^2_kz = e^_k(t - t_0 ) , where we used that @xmath224 , so that the term involving @xmath225 in eq . ( [ eq55 ] ) can be neglected . this also implies that , although the particle number in each mode grows exponentially , the resonance takes a long time to develop . in particular , the typical resonance time , @xmath226 , is much larger than the orbital period of the probe brane , which is of order @xmath227 . this is characteristic of the narrow resonance regime and , hence , a significant particle number is only produced after the probe brane has completed a large number of orbits , given by @xmath228 . to have an idea of the order of magnitude of these quantities , consider the scenario studied in section ii , where @xmath229 with @xmath158 . then , for an orbit with eccentricity @xmath230 and an angular momentum @xmath231 , we have @xmath232 , which satisfies the large distances approximation , and @xmath233 . this implies that the probe brane will have to complete approximately @xmath234 orbits for the particle number to be amplified by one e - folding . to illustrate the results obtained earlier , we have solved eq . ( [ eq52 ] ) for the example described above . an initial vacuum state with zero particle number corresponds to the following initial conditions : [ eq75 ] x_k(t_0)=1 , _ k(t_0)=-i . in figure 2 we have plotted the numerical results obtained for the comoving momentum at the center of the resonance band , @xmath235 . the linear evolution observed for the logarithm of the particle number shows that , as expected , this quantity is being amplified exponentially with time , but that a significant number of particles is produced only after the probe brane has completed a few thousands of orbits . and @xmath231 , giving @xmath236 . the time coordinate @xmath237 is given in units of the orbital period @xmath238.,title="fig : " ] [ fig : figure_2 ] we note that , although this solution was obtained numerically , a formal analytical solution of the mathieu equation can be written in terms of the mathieu sine and cosine functions . in figure 3 we also show the evolution of the particle number for a mode outside the limits of the resonance band . in this case , @xmath239 takes imaginary values and @xmath240 exhibits an oscillating behavior with a small amplitude , confirming that only for comoving momenta @xmath241 a significant particle number is produced by the elliptical motion of the probe brane . it is also worth mentioning that , in the limit of circular orbits , @xmath242 , the parameter @xmath71 vanishes and there is no amplification of any of the particle momentum modes . this confirms our early assumption that the interbrane brane distance needs to vary for particle production to occur . and @xmath231 , giving @xmath236 . the comoving momentum of the mode is @xmath243 . the time coordinate @xmath237 is given in units of the orbital period @xmath238.,title="fig : " ] [ fig : figure_3 ] so far we have not included the backreaction effects of the produced particles on the probe s motion . we will return to this later in section iii c , where we estimate the energy density damped into brane - modes by the resonance and discuss how this affects the probe brane s orbital decay . consider now the case where the field has a non - vanishing mass , @xmath244 . in this case , the classical equations of motion eq . ( [ eq44 ] ) can be generalized to [ eq76 ] _ ( e^-^_)-e^-m^2=0 , or , explicitly , [ eq77 ] + ( 3h - f)-1a^2(1-hv^2)^2+(1-hv^2)h^12m^2=0 . each of the fourier modes then evolves independently according to [ eq78 ] _ k+(3h - f)_k+ . this implies that all modes have , in this case , an effective physical mass which is different from the mass parameter @xmath182 due to the motion of the probe brane : [ eq79 ] m_eff^2=(1-hv^2)h^12m^2 . notice that the mass is not , however , affected by the expansion of the universe . when writing the equations of motion in terms of the rescaled mode function @xmath245 defined earlier , we again obtain the equation for a harmonic oscillator with a varying frequency , which is now given by : [ eq80 ] _ k^2=k_phys^2+m_eff^2+^2 , where all the quantities are time - dependent in the general case . let us now set @xmath96 and compare these results with the ones obtained for the particle production mechanism in the massless case . first , notice that , in the non - relativistic and large distance approximation , we have @xmath246 . thus , the leading order modification introduced by the mass of the field can be obtained by simply replacing @xmath247 . following the same procedure as before , one can reduce the particle - mode equation to the mathieu equation , with the parameter @xmath209 being now given by : [ eq81 ] a_k=4(k^2+m^2)^2 . the parameter @xmath71 , which quantifies the strength and width of the resonance phenomenon , is not modified by the introduction of the mass parameter , so that we expect the particle production mechanism to occur as before . in this case , however , the center of the resonance band is shifted to a lower momentum , @xmath248 , which gives @xmath249 . the upper and lower limits of the resonance band are also modified , being now given by : [ eq82 ] k_min= , + k_max= , which in turn alters the width of the resonance band in the obvious way . if , as in the massless case , we have @xmath250 , we may write @xmath251 , which is larger than the corresponding value in the massless case , satisfying nevertheless the narrow resonance condition . notice that this implies an upper bound for the mass of the particles which can be produced by this mechanism , [ eq83 ] m . in the particle description discussed earlier , this simply means that each particle " in the interbrane distance field @xmath85 needs to have enough energy to decay into two @xmath104-particles at rest . a residual kinetic energy is also necessary if all the modes inside the resonance band are to be excited . in the non - relativistic and large distance approximation , the orbital frequency of the probe brane is assumed to be small , so that only particles with small masses may be excited during its motion . one must recall , however , that we are measuring all quantities in terms of the typical string parameters . in particular , the orbital frequency should be small compared to the string energy scale . if the latter corresponds to the planck scale , then the produced particles can still be quite massive . for the example studied earlier in this section , with orbital parameters @xmath252 , particles up to masses of order @xmath253 gev can be resonantly created . recalling the definition of @xmath85 in terms of the physical interbrane distance , eq . ( [ eq17 ] ) , we may write the upper bound on the mass of the produced particles in terms of the physical semi - major axis of the orbit , @xmath254 . inserting back the missing @xmath39 factors , we obtain : [ eq84 ] m_max = m_s , where @xmath255 is the string energy scale . as we assumed in the beginning that @xmath256 , it is clear from this expression that @xmath257 , which allows nevertheless for the production of very massive particles . in general , particles living in the world - volume of the probe brane will be massive , so that we need to use the results obtained above to describe the parametric resonance . for masses which are small compared to the typical orbital energies of the probe , the simpler treatment of the @xmath183 case will be sufficient . let us now consider the case of an expanding universe , with @xmath258 . the inclusion of the scale factor will modify our previous analysis of particle production in several ways . first , it will change the frequency of each harmonic oscillator particle - mode , namely modifying the factor @xmath259 , given in eq . ( [ eq54 ] ) . also , the physical momenta of the particle - modes will be redshifted as the universe expands , so that , in the non - relativistic and large distance approximation , we have @xmath260 . finally , the motion of the probe brane will be altered , as we have seen in section ii , so that the semi - major axis of elliptical orbits will decrease as @xmath261 , making the angular frequency consequently increase as @xmath262 . furthermore , if the hubble parameter is sufficiently large , the orbital eccentricity may exhibit a significant growth . all the modifications make a complete analytical study of particle production in the probe brane rather complex . in order to determine the leading effects of the expansion , we will consider the motion of the probe brane at sufficiently late times , so that some of the effects of the expansion can be discarded . as we have concluded in section ii , the variation of the eccentricity of the orbits is , in this regime , very small , so that it may be neglected . the explicit effects of the expansion in modifying the factor @xmath207 may also be discarded in this limit , provided that @xmath263 and @xmath264 , or explicitly [ eq85 ] t(r_physq_6 ) , t^2(r_physq_6 ) . the first of these conditions will , _ a priori _ , be more constraining . for the example we have been following in this section , the first condition gives @xmath265 while the second only implies the constraint @xmath266 . with these constraints in mind , we now have to analyze how hubble expansion modifies the factors @xmath267 and @xmath268 in the variable harmonic oscillator frequency . the radial interbrane distance field @xmath100 can now be written , in the low eccentricity orbit approximation , as : [ eq86 ] ( t)r(t ) , with [ eq87 ] r(t)=r_0(tt_0)^-6 , ( t)=_0(tt_0)^9 . computing its time derivatives , we find that they involve terms arising from hubble expansion which are suppressed by at least one power of @xmath237 , being negligible at late times . there are also terms involving the quantity @xmath269 . if the time necessary for particle production to occur is smaller than the age of the universe at that time , we may also discard these terms . after some algebra , the leading order modification to @xmath207 is then given by [ eq88 ] ^2(t)^2(t)((t)(t - t_0 ) ) . the quantity @xmath270 is now time - dependent and can be obtained trivially by including the appropriate time variation of the orbital parameters in its non - expanding expression , eq . ( [ eq67 ] ) . this gives [ eq89 ] ^2(t)=_0 ^ 2(tt_0)^24 , _ 0 ^ 2e_0 ^ 2 . then , taking into account the momentum redshift , we can write the particle - mode equation , to lowest order , as : [ eq90 ] _ k+x_k=0 . following the same reasoning as in the non - expanding case , we rescale the time coordinate by defining the variable @xmath271 . as the angular frequency of the orbit is now time - dependent , this change of variables will introduce new terms in the equation . these will , however , be suppressed by powers of @xmath237 and involve first and second derivatives of the mode function @xmath272 . in the non - expanding case , these were quite small compared to @xmath272 , and one expects them to be negligible in this case as well . using that , to lowest order , @xmath273 , we may write the leading order equation for the mode function in terms of the variable @xmath274 as [ eq91 ] x^_k+[a_k(z)-2q(z)(2z)]x_k=0 , with [ eq92 ] a_k(z)a_k0(1-z ) , q(z)q_0(1+z ) , where @xmath275 and @xmath276 correspond to the initial values of the parameters of the mathieu equation , given by their non - expanding case expressions , and the coefficients @xmath20 and @xmath277 are given by [ eq93 ] , = 310 . we , hence , conclude that the leading order effect of the expansion is to make the coefficients of the mathieu equation vary in time . in particular , their variation is , to a first approximation , linear in the variable @xmath274 and controlled by the single parameter @xmath20 , which will be small at late times . one must take into account , however , that eq . ( [ eq91 ] ) is not the mathieu equation and , namely , does not satisfy the conditions of floquet s theorem which allowed us to define the coefficient @xmath239 . nevertheless , we can use the results obtained in the non - expanding case from the properties of the mathieu equation as a guide to describe the behavior of the modes when @xmath97 . first , notice that , as @xmath209 decreases with @xmath274 , the position of the center of the resonance band , at @xmath249 , will be shifted to higher momentum modes : [ eq94 ] k_c(z)=k_c01-z , k_c0 . thus , we expect modes with comoving momentum larger than @xmath278 to be excited as the probe s orbit decays . to better understand the evolution of each mode , let us analyze the evolution of the exponent @xmath279 , which is given by : [ eq95 ] _ the zeros of @xmath279 occur for [ eq96 ] z_1=-|q_0|+a_k0 - 1a_k0+|q_0| , z_2=|q_0|+a_k0 - 1a_k0-|q_0| , with @xmath280 . this means that @xmath279 will be real for @xmath281 and pure imaginary for @xmath282 and @xmath283 . figure 4 illustrates the typical evolution of @xmath279 for a generic fourier mode . for a generic mode . the shaded area corresponds to the period the mode spends inside the resonance band.,title="fig : " ] [ fig : figure_4 ] thus , each mode may only experience the resonant regime during a finite amount of time , when @xmath279 is real and the mode is inside the resonance band . during the periods where @xmath279 is pure imaginary , we expect the particle number to exhibit an oscillating behavior . in the non - expanding case , the frequency and amplitude of these oscillations for modes outside the resonance band is determined by the value of @xmath284 , so that the larger the latter the smaller the period and the amplitude of the oscillations . as , in an expanding universe , @xmath285 changes in time , we expect the frequency and amplitude of the oscillations of the particle number to vary as the probe brane s orbit decays . similarly , as @xmath286 is not constant when the mode is inside the resonance band , the strength of the resonance is also expected to vary . particle modes will then have different behaviours according to their position relative to the initial resonance band , which can be parametrized by : [ eq97 ] a_k01+|q_0| . recalling that the centre of the original resonance band corresponds to @xmath287 and that the probe s motion begins at @xmath288 , we need to distinguish three different types of modes : 1 . @xmath289 + as both @xmath290 and @xmath291 are negative in this case , these modes will always be outside the resonance band , with an imaginary exponent @xmath279 for all @xmath292 . 2 . @xmath293 + this case corresponds to the particle - modes inside the resonance band in a non - expanding universe , with @xmath294 but @xmath295 . hence , they will start inside the resonance band but stop experiencing the resonant regime for @xmath283 . 3 . @xmath296 + although these modes are outside the initial resonance band , they will experience the resonant behavior at some later stage , as @xmath297 . for both type ii and type iii modes , the maximum value of @xmath298 occurs for @xmath299 , giving , for @xmath300 , [ eq98 ] _ k(z_max)(1 + 310|q_0| ) . this gives the same result as in the non - expanding limit for @xmath287 . it is easy to check that @xmath301 as @xmath302 , the same happening for @xmath290 and @xmath291 . this implies that only modes for which @xmath294 ( @xmath303 ) and @xmath295 ( @xmath304 ) will be excited in this limit , in agreement with the fact that only type ii modes are excited in the non - expanding case ( @xmath305 ) and that these experience the parametric resonance during an infinite period of time . it is also clear from eq . ( [ eq98 ] ) that higher momentum modes are excited by the resonance at later times , as expected from the evolution of the center of the resonance band . the total time each type ii or type iii mode spends inside the resonance band is given by : [ eq99 ] z_bandz_2-z_1(1 - 710|q_0| ) . it is clear that this quantity decreases with @xmath20 , so that the smaller the hubble parameter the more time each mode is excited by the resonance . in the limit @xmath302 , @xmath306 , but as previously discussed this limit only applies to type ii modes , as all the others are outside the resonance band in this limit . one also concludes that higher momentum modes will spend less time inside the resonance band , which suggests these will be less excited . the analysis of the properties of the exponent @xmath279 thus provides a very clear insight on the qualitative evolution of all momentum modes . we would like , however , to be able to quantify the particle number produced by the resonance in each mode . in the non - expanding case , @xmath307 , which implied @xmath308 in the limit of large particle number for type ii modes . despite the variation of @xmath239 in the @xmath97 case , we may take this exponent to be approximately constant during an infinitesimal interval between @xmath274 and @xmath309 . then , during this interval , @xmath272 will be amplified by a factor @xmath310 if the mode is inside the resonance band . integrating this result , we expect that , after a significant number of particles has been produced , [ eq100 ] n_k(z)(2_z_i^z_k(z)dz ) . the initial time @xmath311 refers to the time the mode enters the resonance band , i.e. @xmath312 and @xmath313 for type ii and type iii modes , respectively . one can use eq . ( [ eq100 ] ) to estimate the total particle number produced in each mode by the parametric resonance . the details of this calculation are given in appendix a. for type ii and type iii modes , one obtains : [ eq101 ] n_k^res ( ii)(z_2)&=&q_0 ^ 2211+|q_0|(+2 + + & + & ) , + n_k^res ( iii)(z_2)&=&q_0 ^ 221+|q_0| . ( [ eq101 ] ) constitutes the main result of this section , giving the leading order expressions for the particle number density produced by the resonance in an expanding universe . from these approximated expressions , we can see that the parameter @xmath314 controls the strength of the resonance , a significant number of particles being produced only if @xmath315 . recall that , in the non - expanding case , the typical resonance time was given by @xmath316 . the typical time a mode spends inside the resonance band in the expanding case is , from eq . ( [ eq99 ] ) , of order @xmath317 . hence , apart from numerical factors , the condition for a significant number of particles to be produced is simply stating that the time a given mode spends inside the resonance band should be greater than the typical time the resonance takes to develop , @xmath318 . from the results in eq . ( [ eq101 ] ) , we can also conclude that the total particle number produced increases with @xmath319 for @xmath320 . on the other hand , for @xmath296 , it exhibits a slow decrease with @xmath319 , showing that the production of high momentum modes is suppressed . this agrees with the fact that high momentum modes spend less time inside the resonance band , as obtained above . to check the results obtained so far for the resonant particle production in an expanding universe , we have solved eq . ( [ eq91 ] ) numerically . in order to simplify the computation , we have rescaled the mode functions via @xmath321 , so that initially we have approximately [ eq102 ] _ k(0)1 , ^_k(0)-i . we then computed the function [ eq103 ] _ k(z)=|_k(z)|^2+|^_k(z)|^2 . this is related to the physical particle number density of each mode , given by eq . ( [ eq55 ] ) , approximately by @xmath322 , taking the limit of large particle number . note that @xmath323 initially , as we neglected the @xmath179 factor in eq . ( [ eq55 ] ) , so that the effects of this normalization have to be taken into account before the resonance produces a significant number of particles . in figure 5 , we illustrate the results obtained for modes of types i , ii and iii , including also the analytical prediction obtained from eq . ( [ eq100 ] ) . these simulations correspond to an original resonance strength @xmath324 , the effects of the expansion being quantified by @xmath325 ( recall eq . ( [ eq93 ] ) ) . these values ensure the validity of the approximations made and also that a significant particle number is produced for modes of types ii and iii . and @xmath325 . the plots correspond to ( a ) a type i mode , with @xmath326 , ( b ) a type ii mode , with @xmath287 and ( c ) a type iii mode with @xmath327 . the solid line corresponds to the numerical solution in all three cases , while in ( b ) and ( c ) the dashed line gives the corresponding analytical prediction . the shaded area corresponds to the period that each mode spends inside the resonance band . ] observing the plots shown in this figure , we see that all three particle - modes follow the expected behavior . the type i mode exhibits an oscillating particle number , with oscillations of decreasing amplitude and period , confirming that , in fact , no net particle number is produced reflects the normalization chosen in eq . ( [ eq103 ] ) and does not correspond to a physical particle number . ] . both the type ii and the type iii modes are exponentially amplified during a finite period , after which their particle number oscillates with decreasing amplitude and period , tending to an adiabatically constant value . also , as expected , the type iii mode exhibits an oscillating behavior before entering the resonance band . we can also conclude from figure 5 that the particle number follows the predicted evolution inside the resonance band , the main differences between the numerical and the analytical solutions occurring near the endpoints of the resonance band , where the transitions between resonant and oscillating regimes take place . the discrepancies for low particle number are also due to the normalization of @xmath328 , as discussed earlier . it is nevertheless clear that eq . ( [ eq100 ] ) gives a quite good description of the resonant particle production regime in an expanding universe , although it underestimates the particle number density , and that the contribution of the non - resonant periods are subdominant , as expected . the total particle number produced by the end of the resonant regime , @xmath329 , was computed for several values of @xmath319 , keeping @xmath330 and @xmath20 fixed at the values chosen above . the results we have obtained are shown in figure 6 . . plot ( a ) shows the results for small values of @xmath319 , including type ii and iii modes , and plot ( b ) shows the results for large values of @xmath319 , where only type iii modes are present . the solid line corresponds to the numerical results while the dashed line gives the corresponding analytical prediction . all results correspond to @xmath324 and @xmath325.,title="fig : " ] [ fig : figure_6 ] one observes that @xmath329 increases with @xmath319 for type ii modes and slowly decreases with @xmath319 for type iii modes , in agreement with eq . ( [ eq101 ] ) . the main discrepancies between the numerical results and the analytical prediction are again due to the smooth transition between the resonant and non - resonant regimes at @xmath291 , with the latter giving a subdominant contribution to the total particle number , which is more significant for type iii modes . the different number of oscillations the modes undergo before entering the resonance band give the oscillations that can be observed in figure 6 . these are suppressed for large @xmath319 as the pre - resonance oscillations of the particle number give a negligible contribution for high momentum modes . numerical simulations also show that , as expected , the particle number in all modes decreases with @xmath20 , so that hubble expansion may inhibit the resonant amplification of particle modes at early times . thus , we conclude that our analysis of the resonance regime gives a good description of the mechanism of particle production in branonium for an expanding universe and that the corrections arising from the non - resonant regimes are subdominant . extrapolation of this discussion to high momentum modes is , however , difficult , as these will only be excited at late times , where the approximations we have considered may no longer hold . the production of high momentum particles is nevertheless suppressed , as we have concluded earlier . furthermore , at each given time @xmath331 , only the modes with @xmath332 have entered the resonance band , which means that only those modes for which [ eq104 ] a_0k < a_0k^max(z ) have started being excited . this gives the following momentum cut - off for modes which have already been amplified at @xmath139 : [ eq105 ] k_max(t)=12 ^ 12(1 - 20)^-12 . notice that this gives the expected endpoint of the resonance band in the limit @xmath333 , given by eq . ( [ eq73 ] ) . the generalization of these results for massive particles follows the same reasoning used in the non - expanding case , with the substitution @xmath334 within our approximations . note that , in the expanding case , the physical momentum of the particles is redshifted while their mass remains the same as the universe expands . this modification will then produce a more complex evolution of the parameter @xmath335 in the modified mathieu equation , eq . ( [ eq91 ] ) , given to lowest order by : [ eq106 ] a_k(z)=a_k0(1-z)+4m^2_0 ^ 2(1-z ) , where @xmath336 and all other quantities are defined as before . although this will alter the way the resonance band moves into higher momentum modes as the probe s orbit decays , the evolution of the modes is expected to follow the same qualitative behavior as in the massless case , so that we will not analyze this in more detail . we , thus , conclude that , to lowest order , the parametric resonance survives in an expanding universe , although modes are excited only during a finite period . these results hold only at late times but we note once again that all quantities are measured with respect to the typical string values . we need , however , to bear in mind that eq . ( [ eq91 ] ) is not the mathieu equation and that several other terms in eq . ( [ eq52 ] ) may become important at early times . these may alter the excitation time and the amplification of each mode , or even prevent any particle production . it is nevertheless clear that the effects of the expansion are suppressed at the typical energies involved in the probe s motion , so that one still expects a significant number of particles to be produced . as the resonance develops , the probe brane loses energy to excited @xmath104-particle modes and one may wonder whether the energy radiated by this mechanism is sufficient to affect the probe brane s motion . let us start by computing the energy density of massless particles produced by the resonance in a non - expanding universe . we have seen that each rescaled mode function @xmath272 has an associated harmonic oscillator energy function @xmath337 . for the mode functions @xmath338 , the associated energy function is approximately the same in the non - relativistic and large distance limit , where @xmath339 . hence , the total energy density radiated into brane particle - modes is given by : [ eq107 ] _ p = e_k=12 ^ 2_0^+dk k^2_k(n_k+12 ) , where we have used the momentum space isotropy discussed earlier in this work . after a significant number of particles has been produced , we may take @xmath340 and neglect the @xmath179 factor in eq . ( [ eq107 ] ) . also , we know that particles are produced in a narrow resonance band centered at @xmath341 with a band width @xmath342 . the particle number distribution in momentum space can then be well approximated by a gaussian distribution of the form : [ eq108 ] n_k(t)=n_k_c(t)(-12(k - k_c)^2k(t)^2 ) . the gaussian distribution width @xmath343 should correspond to a fraction of the resonance band width , so that we may write @xmath344 . the coefficient @xmath345 is expected to be time - dependent as the central mode @xmath235 is more amplified than all the other modes in the resonance band , so that the distribution should become more sharply peaked about this value with time . the advantage of writing the particle number distribution in this form is that it allows us to further approximate the result by a @xmath346-function distribution , taking into account that @xmath347 , as discussed earlier . introducing the correct normalization , we may then write : [ eq109 ] n_k(t)n_k_c(t)k(t)(k - k_c ) . using @xmath348 , we obtain : [ eq110 ] _ p & & ( 2)^3k_resn_k_c + & & |q|(2)^4 n_k_c , where the time dependence of @xmath349 , @xmath345 and consequently @xmath350 is implicit . notice that , when @xmath351 , we have @xmath352 , as the resonance vanishes in this limit . to have an estimate of the order of magnitude of this quantity , take the example we have considered before in the discussion of particle production in a non - expanding universe , for which @xmath353 and @xmath354 , in units of the string length . by solving the equations of motion numerically and fitting the obtained particle number distribution to the gaussian distribution given in eq . ( [ eq108 ] ) , we may determine the values of @xmath345 and @xmath349 . for an initial time @xmath355 , we obtained the following results : [ eq111 ] n_k_c(5t_0)&&7.510 ^ 2 , ( 5t_0)0.20 , + n_k_c(10t_0)&&1.610 ^ 7 , ( 10t_0)0.12 . these two examples confirm that , indeed , the resonance width decreases in time . from eq . ( [ eq110 ] ) , we obtain for these two cases @xmath356 and @xmath357 , in units of the string energy scale . the energy density radiated into brane particle - modes should then be compared with the energy density of the interbrane distance field @xmath85 , which is given by @xmath358 . for the example considered above , @xmath359 , so that the value obtained for the energy density radiated into particles up to @xmath360 is negligible when compared to the probe brane s energy density . in general , we obtain : [ eq112 ] _ p||(2)^103 n_k_c , which gives the main result of this subsection . this means that , in the previous example , if we take @xmath361 , up to a @xmath104-particle number density of @xmath362 can be produced without affecting significantly the motion of the probe brane . these results can be easily generalized for the massive case , by taking into account the changes in @xmath235 and @xmath363 discussed earlier . for @xmath250 , we obtain : [ eq113 ] _ p||k_c(2)^73 n_k_c , with @xmath364 and which , as expected , reduces to eq . ( [ eq112 ] ) in the limit @xmath365 . as the momentum of the produced particles decreases with @xmath182 , it is easy to conclude that the energy damped into brane particle - modes is smaller for more massive particles ( recall that the strength of the resonance is not affected by the mass of the particles ) . the analysis of the energy radiated into brane particle - modes is more difficult to perform in the expanding universe case , as more effects have to be taken into account . first , we need to recall the approximate relation between @xmath328 and the physical particle number . next , we need to notice that the mode functions @xmath366 are redshifted by a factor of @xmath367 with respect to the harmonic oscillator mode functions @xmath272 . finally , for the purposes of determining the energy density of the produced particles , we may take @xmath368 . then , we have [ eq114 ] _ p(t)_k . we see that the energy density of the produced particles is redshifted by the usual power of @xmath369 , but is further reduced due to the redshift of the physical momentum and energy of the modes . we can use the expressions obtained for the particle number produced by the resonance in eq . ( [ eq101 ] ) to determine @xmath328 , as we have concluded that the effects of the non - resonant periods are subdominant . writing them in terms of the comoving momentum of the modes , we conclude that , for type iii modes , [ eq115 ] _ p(t)dk k^3(q_0 ^ 2_0 ^ 281k^2 ) . to determine the limits of this integral , one must recall that , at a given time , only a finite number of modes has entered the resonance band . in particular , one may use the value computed in eq . ( [ eq105 ] ) as the upper limit of this integral , although some of these modes have not yet been completely excited by the resonance . the lower limit of the integral will be the first type iii mode , with @xmath370 . this gives a finite energy density radiated into brane modes at each finite time @xmath139 . this energy density is redshifted by hubble expansion , but at the same time modes with increasing energy enter the resonance band . this process will , however , stop at some point , as our approximations will break down when the motion of the probe becomes relativistic and gets too close to the central stack . even if the resonance mechanism persists in this limit , although certainly in a different form , the probe will eventually modify its trajectory , either by colliding with the central stack or via some other mechanism that stabilizes its motion . the contribution of type ii modes is obviously finite and can be computed by integrating eq . ( [ eq114 ] ) using the corresponding expression for @xmath328 given in eq . ( [ eq101 ] ) , with a lower limit @xmath278 and an upper limit @xmath371 for the integral . no particular insight is , however , gained by computing the exact expressions for the energy density for both type ii and type iii modes . instead , we note that the dominant contribution to the energy density will be given by high momentum modes which enter the resonance band at late times . for these , the effects of the expansion of the universe will be less significant and one may use the results obtained in the non - expanding case to compute the energy density produced by the resonance . in this case one should use the values of @xmath71 and @xmath372 at the end of the resonance mechanism . as discussed in @xcite , the probe s trajectory in the background created by the central stack may induce not only the production of brane - bound particles but also radiation into bulk modes , namely gravitational , rr - form and dilatonic fields . this effect is due to the accelerated motion of the probe brane and most of the power is radiated into lower - spin fields , in particular scalar fields which couple to the brane s orbital monopole moment . the probe will thus lose energy through this process , contributing to the decay of its orbit . this will certainly modify the mechanism of resonant production of particle - modes in the brane , namely by varying the orbital frequency , which determines the comoving momentum of the modes that are excited by the parametric resonance . one then expects the effects of radiation into bulk modes to be quite similar to those induced by the universe s expansion , so that we will not analyze this process in detail . nevertheless , it is important to estimate its contribution to the decay of the probe s orbit . the power radiated into bulk scalar modes was estimated in @xcite , where it was shown that the number of orbits the probe can complete before the interbrane distance becomes of order @xmath39 is approximately given by : [ eq116 ] ( r_il_s)^321(g_s^3n)^12 , where @xmath373 is the initial value of the physical radius of the orbit , assuming it is circular . ( this gives a good estimate for the decay time , even though we are interested in small eccentricity orbits for the resonance process . @xmath374 corresponds to the ratio of the decay time to the initial orbital period . ) this expression shows that , for the probe to complete a large number of orbits before decay , it needs to be at a large distance from the central stack , in units of the string length . also , one needs @xmath375 to obtain a sufficiently large value of @xmath374 . this value should be compared to the number of orbits of the probe necessary for the resonance to be effective , which in the non - expanding case is of order @xmath376 . hence , the production of a significant number of particles requires @xmath377 , which gives for the initial radius of the orbit : [ eq117 ] r_il_s(32|q|)^23n^13g_s . for example , if @xmath378 and there are 10 branes in the central stack , we need the initial interbrane distance to be larger than about @xmath379 for the resonance to be effective , which is not too large a number taking into account that @xmath40 is parametrically small . as , in the analysis of the parametric resonance mechanism , we have assumed the interbrane distance to be large compared to the string length , we expect the effects of radiation into bulk modes to be initially negligible . this process should , however , become more important as the orbit decays and increases its acceleration . it is even possible that , at late times , it overcomes hubble expansion as the main energy loss process . nevertheless , the end of the resonance should still be determined by the break down of the non - relativistic and large distance approximation , as this also controls the amount of energy damped into bulk modes . so far we have considered the probe to move at distances from the central stack which are small compared to the typical size of the transverse space directions , so that we may neglect the effects of compactification on the probe s motion . in this section , we will analyze the leading order effects introduced by the finite size of these directions , and show that they may lead to the creation of orbital angular momentum , a necessary condition for resonant particle production to take place . we will consider the simplest case of compactifying the three transverse directions on an isotropic 3-torus of size @xmath380 , which is defined by the identifications @xmath381 . as mentioned earlier , the harmonic function associated with the central stack configuration needs to be modified in this case by including the appropriate brane images " , according to eq . ( [ eq10 ] ) . these images are placed at points with coordinates @xmath382 , with integer @xmath383 , defining a hypercubic lattice corresponding to the covering space of the 3-torus , @xmath384 . although toroidal compactifications are too simple to give realistic particle physics phenomenology , this will be sufficient to illustrate the main effects of compactification on the probe brane s trajectory . the interbrane potential associated with the generalized harmonic function eq . ( [ eq10 ] ) is obtained by computing the propagator for a massless field on a torus , which satisfies : [ eq118 ] ^2g(,)=(-)-1v _ , where @xmath385 is the volume of the transverse 3-torus . the term @xmath386 is included for consistency , so that the integral over the compact manifold of both sides of eq . ( [ eq118 ] ) vanishes . if one expands the green s function @xmath387 in terms of eigenfunctions of the laplacian operator @xmath388 , one concludes that the @xmath386 term removes the unphysical zero - mode which makes the green s function diverge . this term arises naturally from the curvature of the non - compact 4-dimensional spacetime @xcite . it has been shown that one can write the massless propagator on the 3-torus in terms of an integral involving the jacobi - theta function @xmath389 @xcite : [ eq119 ] g()g(,)=1r__0^s . although this expression gives the full compact space propagator , we are mainly interested in the leading order modifications introduced by compactification when the probe is moving closer to the central stack than to any of its images ( orbits around any of the brane images are equivalent due to the symmetries of the hypercubic lattice ) . in @xcite , an expansion of this propagator about the origin was computed using ewald s method for calculating potentials in hypercubic lattices in the context of solid state physics . the leading corrections to the central @xmath390 potential are given by : [ eq120 ] g()=-14r - r^26v_-c_sv_^13-a_4h_4()-a_6h_6()- the values for the coefficients of the various terms were found numerically to be @xmath391 , @xmath392 and @xmath393 . the functions @xmath394 and @xmath395 are harmonic functions of order @xmath396 and @xmath397 , respectively , and the series continues with harmonic terms of higher ( even ) orders . the leading harmonic correction to the propagator is given by : [ eq121 ] h_4()=1r_^5 . recalling that the function @xmath398 contributes to the interbrane potential through the graviton - dilaton and rr - form interactions , we may write this potential for @xmath399 , to order @xmath400 and discarding constant terms , as [ eq122 ] v()&=&-2q_6 , where we defined the function [ eq123 ] f(y^ir ) . we conclude that , to this order , the interbrane potential is modified by two terms . both terms correspond to repulsive contributions to the potential arising from the overall attraction of the image branes and their coefficients are suppressed by a factor @xmath401 , so that their effects are negligible for large transverse volume . jellium " term , of order @xmath402 and whose name arises in the context of solid state physics , gives an isotropic contribution while the asymmetry " term , of order @xmath400 , gives an anisotropic contribution to the potential . we will be more interested in the effects of the asymmetry term , as its breaks the rotational symmetry of the transverse space and leads to the generation of orbital angular momentum . the effects of the jellium term will , however , be more significant close to the central stack . it is easy to show that , for large transverse volume , this term will , to leading order , make the probe brane s orbits precess . this is due to its repulsive nature and , for small eccentricity orbits , the deficit angle is approximately given by @xmath403 . this effect will , however , be suppressed at late times as the probe s angular momentum is redshifted away by hubble expansion . the inclusion of the asymmetry term makes the analysis quite difficult , as the potential is no longer central and depends on both angular coordinates in the transverse space . this may lead , in particular , to non - planar orbits of the probe brane . however , if we set @xmath404 initially , the probe will feel no force along this direction and its trajectory will be confined to the @xmath405 plane as before . we will focus on this particular case , bearing in mind that in general non - planar trajectories may arise . within these assumptions , the problem reduces , as before , to the evolution of the canonically normalized complex scalar field @xmath85 , defined in eq . ( [ eq17 ] ) , in an expanding universe . its potential can be written as [ eq124 ] v()=-||-_j||^2-_a(_r^4+_i^4 - 6_r^2_i^2 ) , where @xmath406 and @xmath407 are , respectively , the real and imaginary parts of the field , @xmath408 was defined in eq . ( [ eq27 ] ) and [ eq125 ] _ j , _ a=32a_4t_6v_3q_6r_^5 give the strength of the jellium and asymmetry terms . this potential is no longer invariant under the global u(1 ) symmetry of the non - compact case , signaling that the probe s angular momentum is no longer conserved . this is quite similar to the u(1)-violating potential governing the evolution of the scalar field in the affleck - dine mechanism @xcite , where non - conservation of angular momentum plays a crucial role in generating the u(1 ) baryon number asymmetry in our universe . the potential remains , however , invariant under the hypercubic group symmetries @xmath409 and @xmath410 . in terms of the polar angle @xmath101 , this means that @xmath411 rotations as well as reflections about the @xmath412 axis are preserved by the asymmetry term , as one can easily conclude by writing eq . ( [ eq123 ] ) for @xmath80 as [ eq126 ] f()=1 - 2 ^ 2(2 ) . hence , we only need to consider initial conditions such that @xmath413 or equivalently @xmath414 . the u(1 ) symmetry violation precludes a complete analytical description of the orbits . however , it is not difficult to obtain a qualitative insight on the main features of the probe s trajectories . if the probe is placed significantly far from the central stack ( but still closer to it than to any of the image branes ) , the asymmetry term will not be negligible and some angular momentum will be created or destroyed . if the probe has no angular momentum initially , as we would expect immediately after inflation , then it will necessarily acquire some and be placed in an orbit around the central stack , instead of just falling towards it along the radial direction . as both the jellium and the asymmetry interactions are repulsive , it is possible that this trajectory does not remain bound to the central stack , becoming connected to one or more branes in the hypercubic lattice . hubble expansion will , however , redshift the probe s energy and angular momentum , so that one expects the probe to become bound to only one brane stack at late times . as the orbital radius decreases , the u(1)-violating term becomes less significant and the particle number associated with @xmath85 should asymptotically become constant , i.e. the angular momentum should vary only due to the universe s expansion . one also expects the jellium term , as well as the asymmetry term , to induce some precession of the orbital axis , which should stop at late times when these terms become negligible . due to the hypercubic symmetries , along @xmath415 the force acting on the probe will be in the radial direction , as @xmath416 , and no angular momentum will be created in these particular directions . for @xmath417 , angular momentum creation should , however , be a generic feature . to have a better understanding of how the initial conditions affect the amount of angular momentum created or destroyed , we have computed the force acting on the probe brane and the associated torque , given by : [ eq127 ] = -v =- v_r - v_i , + = ||=-_rv_i+_iv_r , where we have considered the field @xmath85 as a vector in the @xmath418 plane . recall that the torque gives the variation of the angular momentum , which in terms of the particle number density @xmath27 defined in eq . ( [ eq20 ] ) can be written as : [ eq128 ] dndt+3hn= . we have plotted the isotorque contours for some particular parameter values in figure 7 . we have restricted the position of the probe to the region @xmath419 , where the expansion of the potential about @xmath420 is sufficiently accurate and the probe s motion is bound to the central stack ( near the limits of this region , the orbits may not be bound to the central stack , as the actual region where the force points towards the central stack has a more complicated shape ) . ) plane . coordinates are normalized to the size of the transverse torus , with the value @xmath421 in this example , in units of the string length . we considered @xmath158 and @xmath422 in these units . note that the torque changes sign when crossing one of the @xmath423 axis , with integer @xmath27 , being negative for @xmath417 . also , the absolute value of the torque increases as one moves away from the origin.,title="fig : " ] [ fig : figure_7 ] observing this figure we see that the torque is maximized close to the boundary of the region mentioned above ( darker areas for @xmath414 ) . also , the longer the probe s trajectory remains close to this boundary the more angular momentum it is likely to gain . thus , maximum angular momentum creation should occur if the probe is placed below the centre of the hypercubic cell . the initial value of the hubble parameter @xmath107 will also affect the amount of angular momentum created . if it is of the same order of magnitude as the orbital frequency , one expects the probe to be driven into lower torque regions within a few periods . lower values of the hubble parameter should allow the probe s angular momentum to oscillate significantly as the probe moves through alternate regions of positive and negative torque , but no net angular momentum will be gained after completing the first few orbits . the asymptotic value of the comoving particle number @xmath424 will , hence , be determined by the initial path of the probe . we have simulated the evolution of the probe brane numerically to illustrate this discussion . the initial values for the real and imaginary parts of the field were defined as follows : [ eq129 ] _ r , i(t_0)=_r , ir _ , _ r , i=0 , with @xmath425 , giving @xmath417 , and @xmath426 , which ensures the probe is placed initially within the region where it is bound to the central stack . we have also computed the eccentricity of the orbit , as defined in eq . ( [ eq29 ] ) , with the probe s energy density including both the jellium and asymmetry terms . this quantity should only become meaningful at late times , when the latter terms become negligible , but its evolution tracks the creation of angular momentum along the probe s trajectory . figure 8 shows an example of the results obtained for the probe s orbit . in this case , the probe is placed below the centre of the hypercubic cell and , as expected , a significant angular momentum is produced during its motion . one observes , as expected , a small precession of the orbital axis and the decay of the orbit into regions of lower torque , which drives the orbital eccentricity towards a constant value . initial conditions were chosen in this example so that the inverse hubble parameter is of the same order of magnitude as the orbital period and , hence , the orbit is quickly stabilized . the eccentricity tends in this example to a constant value of @xmath427 . notice the similarities with the example illustrated in figure 1 , the main difference residing in the fact that , in this case , the probe has initially no angular momentum . , @xmath421 and @xmath428 . the probe is initially stationary at the point @xmath429 for @xmath430 and we consider a matter - dominated universe with @xmath131 . the asymptotic value obtained for the eccentricity is @xmath427.,title="fig : " ] [ fig : figure_8 ] in figure 9 we plot the asymptotic values of the eccentricity obtained numerically for different initial positions in the plane @xmath418 , considering two distinct values of the initial hubble parameter in a matter - dominated universe . in both cases , one observes that smaller eccentricity orbits are obtained near the larger torque regions below the centre of the hypercubic cell , as expected . we see that , in general , some angular momentum is produced , although the majority of initial conditions leads to highly eccentric orbits , with @xmath431 . we also conclude that the probe s orbit is generically less eccentric if its motion starts at later times , so that the initial hubble damping of the asymmetry term is smaller . as one may observe in figure 9 , in particular in plot ( b ) , the combination of the asymmetry term and hubble expansion makes the final eccentricity vary in a non - trivial way with the initial position of the probe , namely near @xmath432 , where the orbits may in some cases become unbound . note that these results correspond to particular values of the parameters of the problem and that the values of the asymptotic eccentricity are highly dependent on these parameters , namely the relevant distance scales @xmath79 and @xmath380 . , with @xmath433 ( with similar results for @xmath434 ) , assuming @xmath158 , @xmath421 and @xmath428 . both plots were obtained for a matter - dominated universe with @xmath131 and the motion of the probe starts at ( a ) @xmath435 and ( b ) @xmath436 . all parameters are given in units of the string length . contours were plotted for @xmath437 , with @xmath438 , and darker regions correspond to lower eccentricities.,title="fig : " ] [ fig : figure_9 ] these results show that a significant amount of angular momentum can be created by u(1)-violating terms in the probe s potential arising from compactification of the transverse dimensions , which is a key ingredient for the development of the parametric resonance we have studied in this work . the simple 3-torus compactification thus ilustrates how low eccentricity orbits can be created for a range of initial conditions , even if the probe has initially no angular momentum . potential applications of the resonant particle production mechanism to cosmology will be largely determined by the system s final configuration . as we have discussed before , the @xmath108 branonium we have analyzed in this work is unstable , as the probe ( anti)brane loses energy and angular momentum due to hubble expansion . at some stage , the distance between the probe and the central stack of branes will consequently become of the order of the string length ( although our approximations will break down long before this happens ) . when this occurs , the scalar mode associated with open strings stretching between the probe and the source branes becomes tachyonic , signaling an instability of the system @xcite . condensation of this tachyonic mode will then lead to the annihilation of the probe brane with one of the branes in the central stack . the non - supersymmetric nature of the @xmath108 configuration , which is a general property of all systems mixing brane and antibrane states , is behind this instability . namely , it makes the system evolve into a @xmath179 bps state with @xmath439 parallel @xmath1 branes , with the same total charge as the original configuration but with a lower energy . interesting scenarios may arise if some additional mechanism stabilizes the probe brane at a finite distance from the central stack , in which case the produced particles may survive after the resonance mechanism ends . an attractive possibility for stabilizing multiple brane systems was suggested in @xcite . when supersymmetry breaking occurs , one or more fields within the supermultiplets of the theory typically acquire masses , their value being set by the energy scale at which susy is broken . massive gauge potentials will then induce short - range interactions which , if repulsive , may balance the gravitational atraction between different branes . notice that the presence of a probe antibrane itself breaks susy but that this does not induce bulk field masses , so that other sources of susy breaking need to be considered in this case . suppose , for example , that the @xmath440 rr - form and consequently its magnetic dual form @xmath441 become massive after susy breaking , the same happening to the dilaton field , @xmath13 . both the rr - form and dilaton - mediated interactions will then be described by yukawa potentials whose range is determined by the masses @xmath442 and @xmath443 , respectively . if @xmath444 , the dilaton - mediated interaction will be exponentially suppressed for interbrane distances of order @xmath445 . assuming @xmath446 , we may write the relevant terms in the potential for @xmath447 as [ eq130 ] v(r)=m^4(-1r ) , where @xmath448 gives the overall constant factor . the constant @xmath345 parametrizes the effective strength of the rr - interaction compared to the gravitational atraction and one expects @xmath449 as the dilaton - mediated interaction is negligible . if , as we have assumed so far , the probe is a @xmath0-brane , the rr - interaction , although short - ranged , is attractive and can not balance the @xmath390 gravitational part . if , however , the probe is a @xmath1-brane , we have @xmath450 and stabilization of the system may be possible . in this case , for @xmath451 , the rr - interaction is exponentially suppressed and the probe s motion is governed only by the gravitational term . the evolution of the probe brane will , in this case , be very similar to that of a probe antibrane in a massless rr - form background which we have studied in this work , the potential having a smaller strength than in the latter case . this difference does not modify the qualitative features of the probe s trajectory and all the results we have derived in this work remain valid using an effective central stack charge @xmath452 . in particular , one expects the parametric resonance to develop in the probe s world - volume under the same conditions as before and the effects of transverse space compactification to provide the necessary source of angular momentum for similar initial conditions . the fate of a probe @xmath1-brane will , however , be quite different than that of a probe @xmath0-brane . as the probe s orbit decays due to the universe s expansion , the interbrane distance will eventually become of order @xmath445 . at these distances , the repulsive rr - interaction becomes relevant to the probe s motion and stabilization may be possible . the potential given in eq . ( [ eq130 ] ) has a local minimum formally given by : [ eq131 ] r_0=-m_rr^-1 , where @xmath453 is the lambert w - function , defined as the inverse of @xmath454 . after its angular momentum has been redshifted away by hubble expansion , one expects the probe to settle at this local minimum . this may not be the absolute minimum of the full potential , which includes the dilaton - mediated interaction and other supergravity and string theory corrections closer to the central stack . hence , absolute stabilization of the probe can not be guaranteed , but it is reasonable to expect at least a long - lived metastable state . from the properties of the lambert w - function , one concludes that @xmath455 for @xmath456 , being positive for @xmath457 , and that @xmath458 strictly grows with @xmath345 . hence , as expected , stabilization at large distances from the central stack is only possible if the rr - repulsion is stronger than the gravitational attraction . in this case , one expects the probe brane to stabilize away from the central stack at a distance @xmath459 . the scale of supersymmetry breaking will then determine the cosmological implications of the particle production mechanism analyzed in this work . if susy is broken at very high energies , inducing a large mass for the rr - potential ( but still smaller than the dilaton s mass ) , the probe will stabilize very close to the central stack and no tachyonic modes are present to induce annihilation . the stable probe and the central stack will then be characterized by a general broken gauge symmetry group @xmath460 , where @xmath461 is the number of branes in the probe , with an exponentially large number of particles charged under the @xmath181 gauge group if the resonance develops before stabilization occurs . this may be relevant , for example , to the generation of the baryon asymmetry in our universe . on the other hand , a parametrically small soft susy breaking mass will stabilize the probe at large distances . the parametric resonance may then be relevant for dark matter production , as particles in the probe s world - volume will necessarily interact weakly with the visible sector if the latter is embedded in the central stack . as we have shown , these particles may be supermassive ( although parametrically small compared to the string scale ) , so that this scenario could provide an effective mechanism for a non - thermal production of wimpzillas @xcite . one also expects the parametric resonance to amplify other bosonic modes living in the probe s world - volume , such as yang - mills fields if the probe has more than one brane . if these mediate baryon number - violating forces , their interactions with central stack fields could then provide a mechanism for baryogenesis as the one discussed in @xcite , in which case the probe would need to be stabilized before nucleosynthesis . it is also possible for fermionic particles living in the probe s world - volume to be produced in resonance , although pauli blocking makes this process significantly different from the bosonic case , according to the discussion given in @xcite . thus , if the probe can be stabilized , a resonant production of fermionic dark matter particles may also be achieved through this process . one also expects the interbrane distance field to oscillate about the local minimum of the potential , possibly generating a second stage of resonant amplification . this may be induced from coupling to other fields , as in the standard preheating mechanism , or gravitationally , as in the case described in this work . although this second stage may contribute significantly to the final particle number density in the probe brane s world - volume , we will not discuss them in further detail but rather refer the reader to the discussions given in this work and in the literature @xcite . we emphasize that all these scenarios depend on the particular embedding of the standard model fields in this setup , an issue for which there is still no complete answer and that is closely related to the nature of susy breaking and its communication to the standard model . in this work we have analyzed the mechanism of particle production in @xmath108 branonium systems , as well as in @xmath462 systems with susy breaking . we have shown that , in the limit of large distances and small velocities and for small eccentricity orbits , a parametric resonance will develop , producing scalar particles confined to the probe brane s world - volume . massless particles are produced in a narrow resonance band centered at the comoving momentum corresponding to one half of the probe s orbital frequency @xmath372 , as if resulting from the direct decay of the particles associated with the interbrane distance field . the strength of the resonance is given by the exponent @xmath239 defined in eq . ( [ eq72 ] ) . massive particles are produced in the same way , with energies of order @xmath463 . these energies are small compared to the string energy scale but , as the latter should be close to the planck scale , very massive particles can be produced by the resonance mechanism , according to eq . ( [ eq84 ] ) . for both massless and massive particles , the associated particle number grows exponentially in time and a large number of particles can be produced by this mechanism , just as in the case of preheating after inflation @xcite . however , the resonance surely requires the probe to complete a large number of orbits before the particle - modes can be significantly amplified , due to the small value of the exponent @xmath464 . hubble expansion of the 4-dimensional effective flat frw spacetime makes the probe s orbit decay , redshifting its energy and angular momentum . this alters the development of the parametric resonance significantly if the probe s motion does not occur at sufficiently late times . if , however , its motion begins late in the history of the universe , at least compared to typical string times , the resonance will still develop with the associated resonance band being shifted towards higher momentum modes . each mode will be excited during the finite period it spends inside the resonance band , after which the associated particle number becomes an adiabatic invariant . a significant number of particles , given appproximately by eq . ( [ eq101 ] ) , can be produced if this period is sufficiently long for the resonance to develop , according to the condition @xmath465 , where @xmath20 quantifies the effects of the expansion and was defined in eq . ( [ eq93 ] ) . we have also concluded that a large number of brane - bound particles can be produced without affecting the probe s orbital motion , as can be seen in eq . ( [ eq112 ] ) . radiation into bulk closed string modes will also have a negligible effect if the probe moves at sufficiently large distances , as assumed for the validity of our study . a realistic implementation of this mechanism requires particular initial configurations with large interbrane distances , non - relativistic velocities and almost circular orbits . we have shown that angular momentum creation may result from the effects of compactification of the directions transverse to the branes , illustrating this for the case of a compact 3-torus , where low eccentricity orbits can be produced for some range of initial conditions . in this work , we have also discussed how , for a probe @xmath1-brane , an interbrane potential may arise from supersymmetry breaking , if e.g. the relevant rr - form and the dilaton , @xmath13 , gain a mass in the process . stabilization of the probe is then possible at late times and at distances of order @xmath445 , if @xmath466 . such a stabilization avoids annihilation with the central stack , as necessarily happens for a probe antibrane , making the parametric resonance regime potentially relevant for baryon number or dark matter generation , for example . in our analysis , the parametric resonance arises only for @xmath108 or @xmath462 systems , where the @xmath390 potential allows the probe to move in closed elliptical orbits in a non - expanding universe . it is crucial for the development of the resonance that the interbrane distance field @xmath100 exhibits an oscillating behavior , although the orbits do not need to close , as we have seen for the case of an expanding universe . thus , other @xmath4 or @xmath467 branonium systems with @xmath468 , where the probe trajectories are necessarily unbounded from below , can not exhibit such resonant particle production . additional stabilization potentials may , however , provide the required oscillatory behavior , so that it may be possible to find a resonant particle production mechanism in other cases . it is nevertheless clear that resonant particle production in branonium systems may play an important role in our universe s evolution and we hope with this work to motivate future exploitation of their properties and applications . 0.2 cm * acknowledgements * 0.2 cm the authors would like to thank graham ross , martin schvellinger , andre lukas and yang - hui he for useful discussions . jgr is supported by fct ( portugal ) under the grant sfrh / bd/23036/2005 . jmr is partially supported by the ec network @xmath469 framework programme research and training network quest for unification " ( mrtn - ct-2004 - 503369 ) . this work was partially supported by the eu fp6 marie curie research and training network universenet " ( mrtn - ct-2006 - 035863 ) . 0.5 cm the particle number produced by the parametric resonance can be estimated by computing the integral in eq . ( [ eq100 ] ) . this gives the physical particle number apart from constant factors , subdominant non - resonant contributions and also an @xmath369 redshift factor due to hubble expansion . we have , in order to compute this function , let us write the exponent @xmath279 in the form : [ eqa2 ] _ k(z)=12 , where [ eqa3 ] a&=&q_0 ^ 2 ^ 2-a_k0 ^ 2 ^ 2 , + b&=&2(q_0 ^ 2+a_k0(a_k0 - 1 ) ) , + c&=&q_0 ^ 2-(a_k0 - 1)^2 . for all modes of interest , @xmath470 , while we have @xmath471 for type ii modes and @xmath472 for type iii modes . the sign of @xmath473 will not affect our results . it is also useful to define @xmath474 , which is explicitly given by [ eqa4 ] d^2=4q_0 ^ 2(2a_k0(a_k0 - 1)+(a_k0 - 1)^2 ^ 2+a_k0 ^ 2 ^ 2 ) , and is positive for all type ii and type iii momentum modes . with these considerations , we find , for @xmath475 , [ eqa5 ] n_k^res(z)&=12a_z_i^z . taking into account that @xmath476 , @xmath477 and also that @xmath478 , we can write the total particle number produced by the resonance for type ii modes as : [ eqa6 ] n_k^res(ii)(z_2)=-14a . similarly , for type iii modes , we obtain [ eqa7 ] n_k^res(iii)(z_2)=8d^2(-a)^32 . it is easy to check that eqs . ( [ eqa6 ] ) and ( [ eqa7 ] ) give the same result for the mode in the transition between types ii and iii , at @xmath479 , as expected . recalling that @xmath300 , these expressions can be approximated by those given in eq . ( [ eq101 ] ) . j. dai , r. g. leigh and j. polchinski , mod . lett . a * 4 * ( 1989 ) 2073 ; j. polchinski , phys . lett . * 75 * , 4724 ( 1995 ) [ arxiv : hep - th/9510017 ] . m. berkooz , m. r. douglas and r. g. leigh , nucl . b * 480 * , 265 ( 1996 ) [ arxiv : hep - th/9606139 ] . g. aldazabal _ et al . _ , j. math . phys . * 42 * , 3103 ( 2001 ) [ arxiv : hep - th/0011073 ] ; l. e. ibanez , f. marchesano and r. rabadan , jhep * 0111 * , 002 ( 2001 ) [ arxiv : hep - th/0105155 ] ; d. bailin , g. v. kraniotis and a. love , phys . b * 530 * , 202 ( 2002 ) [ arxiv : hep - th/0108131 ] ; d. cremades , l. e. ibanez and f. marchesano , jhep * 0207 * , 022 ( 2002 ) [ arxiv : hep - th/0203160 ] ; a. m. uranga , class . quant . grav . * 20 * , s373 ( 2003 ) [ arxiv : hep - th/0301032 ] ; c. kokorelis , jhep * 0209 * ( 2002 ) 029 [ arxiv : hep - th/0205147 ] ; c. kokorelis , jhep * 0208 * , 036 ( 2002 ) [ arxiv : hep - th/0206108 ] ; n. ohta and p. k. townsend , phys . b * 418 * , 77 ( 1998 ) [ arxiv : hep - th/9710129 ] . + for recent reviews see , e.g. , r. blumenhagen , m. cvetic , p. langacker and g. shiu , ann . rev . nucl . part . * 55 * , 71 ( 2005 ) [ arxiv : hep - th/0502005 ] ; r. blumenhagen , b. kors , d. lust and s. stieberger , phys . * 445 * , 1 ( 2007 ) [ arxiv : hep - th/0610327 ] . m. r. douglas , in _ cargese 1997 , strings , branes and dualities _ [ arxiv : hep - th/9512077 ] ; a. a. tseytlin , nucl . b * 475 * , 149 ( 1996 ) [ arxiv : hep - th/9604035 ] ; a. a. tseytlin , class . * 14 * , 2085 ( 1997 ) [ arxiv : hep - th/9702163 ] ; m. s. costa , nucl . b * 490 * , 202 ( 1997 ) [ arxiv : hep - th/9609181 ] ; z. guralnik and s. ramgoolam , nucl . b * 499 * , 241 ( 1997 ) [ arxiv : hep - th/9702099 ] . n. arkani - hamed , s. dimopoulos and g. r. dvali , phys . d * 59 * , 086004 ( 1999 ) [ arxiv : hep - ph/9807344 ] ; g. r. dvali and s. h. h. tye , phys . b * 450 * , 72 ( 1999 ) [ arxiv : hep - ph/9812483 ] ; n. arkani - hamed , _ et al . _ , b * 567 * , 189 ( 2000 ) [ arxiv : hep - ph/9903224 ] ; p. binetruy , c. deffayet and d. langlois , nucl . b * 565 * , 269 ( 2000 ) [ arxiv : hep - th/9905012 ] ; j. m. cline , c. grojean and g. servant , phys . rev . lett . * 83 * , 4245 ( 1999 ) [ arxiv : hep - ph/9906523 ] ; c. csaki , _ et al . _ , phys . lett . b * 462 * ( 1999 ) 34 [ arxiv : hep - ph/9906513 ] ; s. s. gubser , phys . d * 63 * , 084017 ( 2001 ) [ arxiv : hep - th/9912001 ] ; a. hebecker and j. march - russell , nucl . b * 608 * , 375 ( 2001 ) [ arxiv : hep - ph/0103214 ] ; h. a. bridgman , k. a. malik and d. wands , phys . d * 65 * , 043502 ( 2002 ) [ arxiv : astro - ph/0107245 ] ; a. kehagias and e. kiritsis , jhep * 9911 * , 022 ( 1999 ) [ arxiv : hep - th/9910174 ] ; p. kraus , jhep * 9912 * ( 1999 ) 011 [ arxiv : hep - th/9910149 ] . + for reviews of brane cosmology from the effective field theory viewpoint see , eg , d. langlois , prog . suppl . * 148 * , 181 ( 2003 ) [ arxiv : hep - th/0209261 ] ; r. maartens , living rev . * 7 * , 7 ( 2004 ) [ arxiv : gr - qc/0312059 ] . c. p. burgess _ et al . _ , jhep * 0107 * , 047 ( 2001 ) [ arxiv : hep - th/0105204 ] . c. p. burgess _ et al . _ , jhep * 0203 * , 052 ( 2002 ) [ arxiv : hep - th/0111025 ] . g. shiu and s. h. h. tye , phys . lett . b * 516 * , 421 ( 2001 ) [ arxiv : hep - th/0106274 ] ; n. t. jones , h. stoica and s. h. h. tye , jhep * 0207 * , 051 ( 2002 ) [ arxiv : hep - th/0203163 ] ; j. h. brodie and d. a. easson , jcap * 0312 * , 004 ( 2003 ) [ arxiv : hep - th/0301138 ] ; h. firouzjahi and s. h. h. tye , phys . b * 584 * , 147 ( 2004 ) [ arxiv : hep - th/0312020 ] . + for reviews of brane inflation in string theory see , eg , e. kiritsis , fortsch . phys . * 52 * , 200 ( 2004 ) [ phys . * 421 * , 105 ( 2005 errat,429,121 - 122.2006 ) ] [ arxiv : hep - th/0310001 ] ; s. h. henry tye , arxiv : hep - th/0610221 . j. h. traschen and r. h. brandenberger , phys . d * 42 * , 2491 ( 1990 ) ; l. kofman , a. d. linde and a. a. starobinsky , phys . lett . * 73 * , 3195 ( 1994 ) [ arxiv : hep - th/9405187 ] ; y. shtanov , j. h. traschen and r. h. brandenberger , phys . d * 51 * , 5438 ( 1995 ) [ arxiv : hep - ph/9407247 ] ; d. boyanovsky , h. j. de vega , r. holman , d. s. lee and a. singh , phys . d * 51 * , 4419 ( 1995 ) [ arxiv : hep - ph/9408214 ] ; m. yoshimura , prog . phys . * 94 * , 873 ( 1995 ) [ arxiv : hep - th/9506176 ] ; d. i. kaiser , phys . d * 53 * , 1776 ( 1996 ) [ arxiv : astro - ph/9507108 ] ; s. y. khlebnikov and i. i. tkachev , phys . rev . lett . * 77 * , 219 ( 1996 ) [ arxiv : hep - ph/9603378 ] . l. kofman , a. d. linde and a. a. starobinsky , phys . d * 56 * , 3258 ( 1997 ) [ arxiv : hep - ph/9704452 ] ; p. b. greene , l. kofman , a. d. linde and a. a. starobinsky , phys . d * 56 * , 6175 ( 1997 ) [ arxiv : hep - ph/9705347 ] ; g. n. felder , l. kofman and a. d. linde , phys . d * 59 * ( 1999 ) 123523 [ arxiv : hep - ph/9812289 ] . s. kachru , r. kallosh , a. linde , j. m. maldacena , l. p. mcallister and s. p. trivedi , jcap * 0310 * , 013 ( 2003 ) [ arxiv : hep - th/0308055 ] . s. shandera , b. shlaer , h. stoica and s. h. h. tye , jcap * 0402 * , 013 ( 2004 ) [ arxiv : hep - th/0311207 ] . a. sen , jhep * 9808 * , 012 ( 1998 ) [ arxiv : hep - th/9805170 ] ; a. sen , in _ cargese 1999 , progress in string theory and m - theory _ , arxiv : hep - th/9904207 . e. kolb , d. j. h. chung and a. riotto , in _ buenos aires 1998 , trends in theoretical physics 2 _ , arxiv : hep - ph/9810361 . e. w. kolb , a. linde and a. riotto , phys . lett . * 77 * , 4290 ( 1996 ) [ arxiv : hep - ph/9606260 ] . p. b. greene and l. kofman , phys . rev . d * 62 * , 123516 ( 2000 ) [ arxiv : hep - ph/0003018 ] . Abstract:

Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.

Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered . Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video . Paper: adic , or bratteli - vershik ( bv ) , systems represent all measure - preserving systems on nonatomic probability spaces and all minimal systems on the cantor set . they provide a convenient combinatorial description of the construction of systems by the cutting and stacking method , present tail fields of stochastic processes as the fields of adic - invariant sets , facilitate the study of measure - preserving and topological orbit equivalence , and present important and interesting particular systems for detailed study . we refer to the introductions of the papers in our references list and the survey @xcite for background and further details . for adic systems , invariant measures and orbit equivalence depend only on the graph - theoretic structure of the underlying diagram and are independent of the orders assigned to the edges entering each vertex , which determine the adic transformation ; further dynamical properties , such as the spectrum , isomorphism , or joinings , do depend on the particular ordering . some recent work has investigated how the orderings assigned to the edges can affect the sets of maximal and minimal paths . bezuglyi , kwiatkowski , and yassawi @xcite studied arbitrary reorderings of adic systems to determine which ones the perfect " orderings allow the adic transformation to be defined as a homeomorphism . they showed that when orderings of a diagram of finite rank @xmath1 are chosen uniformly at random , there is a @xmath2 such that almost every ordering has @xmath3 maximal and @xmath3 minimal paths . medynets @xcite gave an example of a diagram for which no ordering is perfect . bezuglyi and yassawi @xcite pursue this question beyond the finite rank case and give necessary and sufficient conditions for a diagram to admit a perfect ordering . janssen , quas , and yassawi @xcite produce a class of systems for which @xmath4 and almost every ordering is imperfect . it is important to determine when coding the orbits of paths according to the natural partition into cylinder sets determined by the first @xmath0 edges produces an essentially faithful representation of the system as a subshift on a finite alphabet ; for then traditional methods of symbolic dynamics can be applied , and , even if the adic transformation can not be defined as a homeomorphism , nevertheless the corresponding subshift can be studied as a legitimate dynamical system . by essential " we mean that the coding map is one - to - one except on a set of paths that has measure zero for each fully supported adic - invariant probability measure on the system . this property was proved for the pascal adic with a particular edge ordering ( namely one that is lexicographical from left to right at each vertex ) in @xcite and for a wider class of systems in @xcite . on the other hand , downarowicz and maass @xcite ( see also @xcite ) showed that each minimal finite topological rank adic system , namely one that can be represented up to topological conjugacy by an adic system with a bounded number of vertices on each level , with unique maximal and minimal paths , and having all orbits dense , either has a faithful coding by the first @xmath0 edges for some @xmath0 or else is topologically conjugate to an odometer . this result may be regarded as a generalization of previous work ( see @xcite ) on the relations among stationary adic systems , substitutions , and odometers . it was extended to aperiodic cantor minimal systems in @xcite . so far we have been lacking useful tests for when a general adic system allows an essentially faithful representation as a subshift or when it is topologically conjugate to an odometer . here we show ( theorem [ thm : coding ] ) that for the pascal system every edge ordering allows essentially faithful coding by the first three edges . further , extending the ideas in @xcite , we show that for every ordering the subshift defined by the coding is topologically weakly mixing ( theorem [ thm : weakmixing ] ) . we find this somewhat surprising , since the existence of eigenfunctions is highly sensitive to timing . we also establish a necessary and sufficient condition for an adic system of a fairly general kind to be topologically conjugate to an odometer ( theorem [ uoimpliesodometer ] ) . ( previously , sufficient conditions were known for systems with a bounded number of vertices per level @xcite . a similar condition has been given independently by durand and yassawi @xcite , and a necessary condition was mentioned in @xcite . ) we use this condition to determine the probability that a random order on a fixed diagram , or an ordered diagram constructed at random in a certain sense , is topologically conjugate to an odometer ( examples [ ex : odometerprob ] and [ ex : odometer2 ] ) . we also study the subshift that is the closure of the union of the subshifts determined by the pascal adic with all possible orderings : we estimate its complexity , prove that it is not topologically transitive , and show that its only periodic points are the two fixed points . on the other hand , the intersection over all orderings consists of just four orbits . the final section presents examples and further observations related to the questions under discussion . in this section we fix notation and terminology for the pascal adic system . similar concepts apply also to other adic systems . let @xmath5 denote the pascal graph , which is a directed graph with countably many vertices arranged into levels . the set of vertices is @xmath6 . the set @xmath7 of directed edges consists of edges from @xmath8 to @xmath9 and @xmath10 for each @xmath11 . the _ level _ of a vertex @xmath8 is @xmath12 . for each @xmath13 let @xmath14 denote the set of vertices at level @xmath15 , and , for @xmath16 , @xmath17 denote the set of edges with source in @xmath18 and range in @xmath19 . we specify an _ ordering _ of the incoming edges to all vertices other than @xmath20 by a function @xmath21 : the edge from @xmath22 to @xmath8 is defined to be less than the edge from @xmath23 to @xmath8 if and only if @xmath24 . as usual with adic systems , each such ordering determines a partial order on the set @xmath25 of infinite directed paths on @xmath5 , viewed as sequences of adjacent edges , that begin at the _ root _ , @xmath20 . paths @xmath26 and @xmath27 are _ comparable _ if they eventually coincide : there is an @xmath28 such that @xmath29 for all @xmath30 . if @xmath15 is the smallest such @xmath28 , then @xmath31 if and only if @xmath32 . then the adic transformation @xmath33 is defined on the complement of the set @xmath34 of paths that consist entirely of maximal edges by letting @xmath35 equal the smallest path @xmath36 that is larger than @xmath37 . similarly , @xmath38 is defined on the complement of the set @xmath39 of paths that consist entirely of minimal edges . edges connecting `` boundary vertices '' , i.e. from @xmath40 to @xmath41 and from @xmath42 to @xmath43 , are both maximal and minimal . define @xmath44 to be the path down the left boundary of the diagram and @xmath45 to be the path down the right boundary . the ordinary pascal adic system is determined by the ordering @xmath46 . when we are working with a fixed ordering , the subscript @xmath47 can be omitted . denote by @xmath48 the orbit under @xmath33 of @xmath49 . sometimes @xmath33 can be extended to a map from ( part of ) @xmath34 to @xmath39 . for each @xmath50 we consider the partition @xmath51 of @xmath25 into the cylinder sets @xmath52 defined by specifying the first @xmath0 edges @xmath53 , @xmath54 . these are clopen sets that generate the topology of @xmath25 . for each @xmath0 there are @xmath55 cylinder sets of level @xmath0 . the elements of @xmath51 may be regarded as symbols and identified with the sets @xmath56 , the strings @xmath57 , or the corresponding initial paths of length @xmath0 . the set @xmath58 of two - sided infinite sequences with entries from @xmath51 is a compact metric space with distance @xmath59 ) . for a fixed ordering @xmath47 , each path @xmath60 has a @xmath0-coding @xmath61 given by @xmath62 if and only if @xmath63 . we write @xmath64 as @xmath65 the subshift @xmath66 consists of the set @xmath67 of all sequences each of whose finite subblocks can be found in @xmath68 for some @xmath60 , together with the shift transformation @xmath69 defined by @xmath70 . there are natural factor maps from @xmath71 to @xmath72 for each @xmath73 . we say the @xmath0-coding is _ faithful _ if @xmath74 whenever @xmath75 . the system is expansive if and only if there is a @xmath0 such that the @xmath0-coding is faithful . the fully supported nonatomic adic - invariant ergodic probability measures on the path space @xmath25 are a one - parameter family @xmath76 . each edge from @xmath23 to @xmath8 is assigned weight @xmath77 , and each edge from @xmath22 to @xmath8 is assigned weight @xmath78 . the measure of a cylinder set @xmath79 as above is then the product of the weights on the edges that define the cylinder set . for a fixed vertex @xmath80 , all cylinder sets determined by paths from @xmath20 to @xmath80 then have the same measure ( see @xcite ) . changing the ordering of the edges just changes the order in which paths , or cylinder sets , are mapped to one another and does not change the set of fully supported adic - invariant ergodic probability measures . [ prop : maxpaths ] for each ordering @xmath47 of the pascal graph and each fully supported adic - invariant probability measure @xmath81 , the set @xmath82 has measure 0 . let @xmath83 . for each vertex @xmath84 there is a unique ( finite ) reverse path from @xmath80 to the root @xmath20 that follows only minimal edges . ( the corresponding cylinder set @xmath85 corresponds to the base of a column in the cutting and stacking representation of the system . ) if @xmath80 is at level @xmath15 , then @xmath86 . thus @xmath87 since each infinite path that follows only minimal edges is in the decreasing intersection of the sets @xmath88 , the set of minimal paths has @xmath81 measure 0 . similarly , the set of maximal paths has measure @xmath89 , so @xmath48 is the countable union of sets of measure @xmath89 . we assign _ basic blocks _ @xmath90 on the alphabet @xmath91 to the vertices @xmath8 of @xmath5 as follows . the vertices @xmath92 , for all @xmath93 , are assigned the block @xmath94 ; the vertices @xmath95 , for all @xmath96 , are assigned the block @xmath97 ; and each vertex @xmath8 for which both @xmath98 and @xmath99 are at least 1 is assigned the block @xmath100 if @xmath101 , and @xmath102 if @xmath103 . we say that @xmath12 is the _ level _ of the basic block @xmath90 . the basic block @xmath90 is the initial block of length @xmath104 of the 1-coding of the minimal path from @xmath20 to @xmath8 . the number of @xmath94 s in @xmath90 is given by the binomial coefficient @xmath105 , and the number of @xmath97 s by @xmath106 . if we are dealing with a fixed ordering , the subscript @xmath47 can be omitted . for each @xmath50 basic blocks @xmath107 on the symbols of @xmath51 of the @xmath0-coding are defined in a similar way . we retain the meaning of the coordinates @xmath98 and @xmath99the diagram is not telescoped . when @xmath108 , for each @xmath109 there are @xmath110 paths from the root to the vertex at @xmath111 . since they are linearly ordered by @xmath47 , we may label them in order as @xmath112 . these labels @xmath113 , for all @xmath114 and @xmath115 , may be taken as the @xmath55 symbols of the alphabet @xmath51 . for each @xmath116 the basic block at the vertex @xmath111 is @xmath117 . to form the basic blocks at each level @xmath118 , the level @xmath119 basic blocks are concatenated according to the ordering @xmath47 , as above . note that while for @xmath120 , the corresponding alphabet for @xmath121 is not @xmath122 , we can still talk about counts of @xmath94 s and @xmath97 s associated to @xmath123 by considering the factor map @xmath124 . not only does each basic block @xmath125 determine the vertex @xmath8 , but also the @xmath0-symbol counts in @xmath125 determine @xmath8 . for any @xmath0 and any path @xmath37 in an arbitrary adic system , due to the structure of the diagram the @xmath0-coding of the orbit of @xmath37 has a natural hierarchical structure of factorings for each @xmath126 into basic blocks of level @xmath15 . this is evident for substitution subshifts and is especially simple ( periodic ) for odometers . when an iterate of @xmath37 under @xmath127 enters the cylinder determined by a minimal path from the root to a vertex @xmath80 at level @xmath15 , the coding at that instant begins an occurrence of the basic block at level @xmath15 . ( in the cutting and stacking version , the orbit of @xmath37 enters the base of a column and proceeds up the column . ) in the following we continue to focus on the pascal graph . fix an ordering @xmath47 of the pascal graph @xmath5 , a coding length @xmath50 , and a sequence @xmath128 . for each @xmath126 the basic blocks of level @xmath15 are distinct ( since they determine different vertices ) , and thus for fixed @xmath12 , @xmath129 determines the vertex @xmath8 of @xmath5 to which it is associated . suppose that , for each @xmath126 , @xmath130 factors into a concatenation of basic blocks of level @xmath15 so that the factorizations are consistent across levels and respect the ordering , in the following sense : for all @xmath126 , each basic block of the level @xmath131 factorization is the concatenation according to the fixed ordering of two adjacent basic blocks of the level @xmath15 factorization . more precisely , suppose that for each @xmath132 we may write @xmath130 as a concatenation @xmath133 of blocks @xmath134 , in such a way that 1 . each @xmath134 is a basic block @xmath135 of level @xmath15 with respect to @xmath47 ; 2 . there is a function @xmath136 such that @xmath137 for all @xmath15 and @xmath138 , and , for each @xmath139 and each @xmath138 , @xmath140 ; 3 . if @xmath141 , then @xmath142 and @xmath143 , while if @xmath144 , then @xmath145 and @xmath146 . such a system of factorings will be called a _ @xmath47-consistent factoring scheme for @xmath130_. note that for every @xmath0 the @xmath0-coding of every path in @xmath25 ( even if one - sided ) has a natural @xmath47-consistent factoring scheme determined by the sequence of vertices through which it passes . in principle , for some @xmath0 a @xmath0-coding of a path might have more than one consistent factoring scheme . in the following proposition we show that each consistent factoring scheme determines a unique corresponding path . in theorem [ thm : coding ] and corollary [ cor : recognizability ] we show that the 3-coding of every path in @xmath147 has a unique factorization scheme since the 3-coding corresponds to a unique path . a path in @xmath48 ( in the orbit of a maximal or minimal path ) may have only a 1-sided @xmath0-coding . the following proposition covers this case as well . [ prop : consistentscheme ] suppose that an ordering @xmath47 of the pascal graph @xmath5 , @xmath50 , and a sequence @xmath64 with a @xmath47-consistent factoring scheme are given . then there is a unique path @xmath37 such that the @xmath0-coding of the orbit of @xmath37 under the adic transformation @xmath33 , insofar as defined , is ( if necessary a truncation of ) the given sequence @xmath148 and the natural factoring defined by the path coincides with the given one . if @xmath149 , @xmath127 can be extended so as to give a complete @xmath150-orbit which has the complete @xmath0-coding @xmath148 . suppose that an ordering @xmath47 and @xmath64 with a @xmath47-consistent factoring scheme are given . denote by @xmath151 the central basic block of level @xmath15 in the given factorization , by which we mean the basic block that includes the coordinate 0 . let @xmath152 be such that @xmath153 has origin at the beginning of @xmath151 . form a path @xmath37 which at each level @xmath15 is at vertex @xmath154 determined by the level @xmath15 central block @xmath151 , and with initial segment of length @xmath15 equal to @xmath155 applied to the minimal path from @xmath20 to @xmath154 . the central symbol of @xmath148 determines the vertices of @xmath37 at levels @xmath156 . then the @xmath0-coding @xmath68 of @xmath37 equals the given sequence @xmath148 on the range of coordinates @xmath157 $ ] for every @xmath15 . thus the coding and factorization determine the sequence of vertices through which the path passes , and no other path can have the same coding and natural factorization . if @xmath158 , then @xmath159 and the full coding @xmath68 equals the full sequence @xmath148 . otherwise , @xmath148 tells us how to define @xmath33 on a maximal or minimal path in such a way that @xmath148 is still the coding of a complete orbit . for example , suppose that @xmath160 for all @xmath15 , so that for each @xmath15 the path @xmath37 defined above is maximal from the root to @xmath154 and hence is in @xmath34 . apply the above procedure to @xmath161 to produce a path @xmath162 , and define @xmath163 . then the right half of @xmath148 is the @xmath0-coding of the forward orbit of @xmath164 under @xmath33 . so we may regard the full sequence @xmath148 as the @xmath0-coding of the orbit of @xmath37 under the extension of @xmath33 to part of @xmath48 . ( note that since the sequence @xmath64 is given , @xmath165 , so that @xmath166 . ) [ block containment ] fix an ordering @xmath47 of the pascal diagram , with path space @xmath25 . suppose @xmath37 , @xmath167 are distinct paths in @xmath25 that are determined by sequences @xmath168 with @xmath47-consistent factoring schemes and have full @xmath150-orbits under @xmath33 ( extended if necessary ) as in proposition [ prop : consistentscheme ] . suppose further that @xmath37 and @xmath167 follow only minimal edges from @xmath20 to distinct vertices @xmath8 and @xmath169 respectively , where @xmath170 for some @xmath171 . then the 3-codings of @xmath37 and @xmath167 are not the same . in other words , two such paths that follow only minimal edges starting at the root to different vertices at the same level do not have the same coding by initial path segments of length 3 . suppose @xmath37 and @xmath167 are as above . in particular , we may assume that the 1- ( and 2- ) codings of @xmath37 and @xmath167 are the same : @xmath172 and @xmath173 ( otherwise we are done ) . the longest minimal path from @xmath20 that is contained in both @xmath37 and @xmath167 ends at some vertex @xmath174 at level @xmath175 . in other words , @xmath37 and @xmath167 _ split _ at @xmath80 . if @xmath176 then @xmath37 and @xmath167 would disagree on one of their first three edges and we would be done ; we therefore consider only the cases where @xmath177 . we may assume that no paths with a lower level splitting occur ( at the same time ) in the forward orbits of @xmath37 and @xmath167 , respectively . specifically , find a smallest @xmath178 for which there exists an @xmath1 such that @xmath179 and @xmath180 are minimal until distinct vertices at level @xmath181 and contain the same edges until level @xmath178 , replace @xmath37 and @xmath167 by @xmath182 and @xmath183 , and define @xmath80 to be the vertex where this latter pair split . it is the minimality of @xmath178 that we will exploit in the following proof by contradiction . we consider several cases according to where in the diagram the vertex @xmath80 can occur . our first case is when @xmath80 is an interior vertex . in other words , let @xmath184 @xmath185 . since both paths are minimal until level @xmath186 , there exist two minimal edges with source @xmath80 ; label @xmath187 so that the left one is contained in @xmath37 and the right one contained in @xmath167 . let @xmath188 be the length of the basic block at @xmath80 and consider the paths @xmath189 and @xmath190 . then at level @xmath178 , @xmath189 passes through vertex @xmath191 and @xmath190 passes through vertex @xmath192 , and both are minimal until level @xmath175 . therefore the split between the two paths in the orbits of @xmath37 and @xmath167 occurred at some level @xmath193 where @xmath194 . this contradicts the minimality of @xmath178 . ( see figure [ interior ] , where we indicate minimal edges by dashed lines and maximal edges by solid lines . ) ( 8,4 ) + ( 1,-1 ) ; ( 8,4 ) + ( -1,-1 ) ; ( 6,4)+(1,-1 ) ; ( 10,4)+(-1,-1 ) ; ( 8,4 ) circle ( 3 pt ) ; ( 9,3 ) circle ( 3 pt ) ; ( 7,3 ) circle ( 3 pt ) ; ( 6,4 ) circle ( 3 pt ) ; ( 8,4 ) circle ( 3 pt ) ; ( 6,4 ) circle ( 3 pt ) ; ( 10,4 ) circle ( 3 pt ) ; at ( 8,4 ) @xmath195 ; at ( 6,4 ) @xmath191 ; at ( 10,4 ) @xmath192 ; at ( 8.5,3.5)@xmath167 ; at ( 7.5,3.5)@xmath37 ; at ( 9.5,3.5)@xmath190 ; at ( 6.5,3.5)@xmath189 ; now consider the case when @xmath80 is on the left side of the diagram ( i.e. @xmath196 for some @xmath197 ) . since @xmath198 ( @xmath44 and @xmath45 do not have a @xmath47-consistent coding scheme ) , both @xmath37 and @xmath167 must leave the left side of the diagram . consider first the case when both leave the left side via minimal edges . see figure [ stepa ] . then @xmath199 and we label so that @xmath37 contains the minimal path to @xmath200 and @xmath167 contains the minimal path to @xmath201 . since @xmath37 leaves the left side of the diagram , it passes through a vertex @xmath202 , and this edge is minimal . in this case , we will examine the first edge coding of @xmath37 and @xmath167 . we first note that @xmath203 where @xmath204 . ( in general , the basic block at @xmath205 for any @xmath206 is of the form @xmath207 for some @xmath208 , and @xmath138 and @xmath209 are nondecreasing as @xmath98 increases . ) since the edge connecting vertices @xmath210 and @xmath202 is minimal , @xmath211 . since @xmath212 , @xmath213 contains @xmath214 ( the blocks are the same if @xmath215 ) . therefore @xmath216 with @xmath217 and @xmath218 . since @xmath37 and @xmath167 are minimal into @xmath202 and @xmath201 respectively , @xmath219 immediately follows the decimal in @xmath220 ( i.e. beginning in the origin position ) and @xmath221 immediately follows the decimal in @xmath222 . however , @xmath217 contradicts our assumption that @xmath37 and @xmath167 have the same 1-coding . ( 0,0 ) + ( 6,6 ) ; ( 5,5)+(1,-1 ) ; ( 1,1)+(1,-1 ) ; ( 3,1)+(-1,-1 ) ; ( 1,1 ) circle ( 3 pt ) ; ( 5,5 ) circle ( 3 pt ) ; ( 6,4 ) circle ( 3 pt ) ; ( 3,1 ) circle ( 3 pt ) ; ( 2,0 ) circle ( 3 pt ) ; at ( 5,5 ) @xmath223 ; at ( 6,4 ) @xmath224 ; at ( 5.5,4.5)@xmath167 ; at ( 1,1 ) @xmath210 ; at ( 1.5,.5 ) @xmath37 ; at ( 2,0 ) @xmath225 ; ( an analogous argument rules out the case where @xmath37 and @xmath167 split along the diagonal @xmath226 and contain minimal paths from the root to @xmath227 . ) our final and most complex case is the case when @xmath80 is on the left side of the diagram and @xmath167 leaves along a minimal edge while @xmath37 leaves along a maximal edge at some later level . thus @xmath196 , for some @xmath228 , @xmath199 , @xmath37 contains the minimal path to @xmath200 , @xmath167 contains the minimal path to @xmath201 and @xmath37 exits the left side at @xmath210 , for some @xmath229 . if @xmath37 is not in @xmath34 it does not continue along maximal edges forever . let @xmath230 at level @xmath231 be the range of the first minimal edge in @xmath37 after @xmath202 . note that @xmath232 . since the edge connecting @xmath223 and @xmath201 is the first non - maximal edge in @xmath167 , @xmath233 passes through vertex @xmath234 . in particular , @xmath233 contains the minimal path from the root vertex into @xmath234 . in order not to contradict the minimality of @xmath178 , @xmath235 must also pass through vertex @xmath234 . since @xmath37 did not pass through @xmath201 , @xmath235 must contain the edge connecting @xmath234 and @xmath236 and this edge must be minimal according to the edge ordering . see figure [ stepb ] . on the other hand , if @xmath37 is in @xmath34 , then by assumption @xmath37 has a complete orbit determined by a complete code with a consistent factorization scheme ( see proposition [ prop : consistentscheme ] ) . in this case , @xmath235 is in @xmath39 . in either case , @xmath235 actually consists of all minimal edges up to level @xmath237@xmath238 and therefore either passes through @xmath239 or @xmath240 along a minimal edge . it is this fact that we will use to arrive at a contradiction . ( 0,0 ) + ( 6,6 ) ; ( 1,1 ) + ( 1,-1 ) ; ( 4,4) + ( 1,-1 ) ; ( 6,4 ) + ( -1,-1 ) ; ( 6,4) + ( 1,-1 ) ; ( 1,1 ) circle ( 3 pt ) ; ( 4,4 ) circle ( 3 pt ) ; ( 6,4 ) circle ( 3 pt ) ; ( 5,3 ) circle ( 3 pt ) ; ( 7,3 ) circle ( 3 pt ) ; ( 2,0 ) circle ( 3 pt ) ; at ( 4,4 ) @xmath223 ; at ( 5,3 ) @xmath201 ; at ( 6,4 ) @xmath234 ; at ( 7,3 ) @xmath236 ; at ( 4.5,3.5)@xmath167 ; at ( 1.5,.5)@xmath37 ; at ( 5.5,3.5)@xmath233 ; at ( 6.5,3.5)@xmath235 ; we now consider @xmath189 where @xmath241 , in other words , the path in the forward orbit of @xmath235 which first contains the maximal edge from @xmath242 to @xmath236 . it contains the unique minimal path from @xmath20 to @xmath242 . by an argument similar to the above , we now know that @xmath190 must also contain the unique minimal path from @xmath20 to @xmath242 ( since otherwise the orbits of @xmath37 and @xmath167 would split earlier than level @xmath178 ) , but then continue along the edge with range @xmath243 , which is necessarily minimal . see figure [ stepc ] . ( 3,1)+(1,-1 ) ; ( 5,1 ) +(-1,-1 ) ; ( 5,1)+(1,-1 ) ; ( 1,1)+(1,-1 ) ; ( 3,1)+(-1,-1 ) ; at ( 1,1 ) @xmath223 ; at ( 3,1 ) @xmath234 ; at ( 5,1 ) @xmath242 ; at ( 4,0 ) @xmath236 ; at ( 6,0 ) @xmath243 ; at ( 3.5,.5)@xmath235 ; at ( 4.5,.5)@xmath189 ; at ( 5.5 , .5)@xmath190 ; ( 1,1 ) circle ( 3 pt ) ; ( 2,0 ) circle ( 3 pt ) ; ( 3,1 ) circle ( 3 pt ) ; ( 5,1 ) circle ( 3 pt ) ; ( 4,0 ) circle ( 3 pt ) ; ( 6,0 ) circle ( 3 pt ) ; the issue comes at the next stage when we consider @xmath244 and @xmath245 , where @xmath246 . we see that @xmath245 passes through vertex @xmath247 . however , since the edge contained in @xmath189 leaving vertex @xmath236 is minimal , we see from the ordering on the edges that has been established thus far that @xmath244 must pass either through vertex @xmath223 or vertex @xmath242 at level @xmath199 . see figure [ stepd ] . therefore we again contradict the minimality of @xmath178 . ( 3,1)+(1,-1 ) ; ( 5,1 ) +(-1,-1 ) ; ( 5,1)+(1,-1 ) ; ( 1,1)+(1,-1 ) ; ( 3,1)+(-1,-1 ) ; ( 7,1)+(-1,-1 ) ; ( 3,-1)+(-1,1 ) ; ( 3,-1)+(1,1 ) ; at ( 1,1 ) @xmath223 ; at ( 3,1 ) @xmath234 ; at ( 5,1 ) @xmath242 ; at ( 3,-1 ) @xmath240 ; at ( 6,0 ) @xmath243 ; at ( 4.5,.5)@xmath189 ; at ( 6.5 , .5)@xmath245 ; at ( 1.5,.5)@xmath244 ; ( 1,1 ) circle ( 3 pt ) ; ( 2,0 ) circle ( 3 pt ) ; ( 3,1 ) circle ( 3 pt ) ; ( 5,1 ) circle ( 3 pt ) ; ( 4,0 ) circle ( 3 pt ) ; ( 6,0 ) circle ( 3 pt ) ; ( 7,1 ) circle ( 3 pt ) ; ( 3,-1 ) circle ( 3 pt ) ; ( 3,1)+(1,-1 ) ; ( 5,1 ) +(-1,-1 ) ; ( 5,1)+(1,-1 ) ; ( 1,1)+(1,-1 ) ; ( 3,1)+(-1,-1 ) ; ( 7,1)+(-1,-1 ) ; ( 5,-1)+(1,1 ) ; ( 5,-1)+(-1,1 ) ; at ( 1,1 ) @xmath223 ; at ( 3,1 ) @xmath234 ; at ( 5,1 ) @xmath242 ; at ( 5,-1 ) @xmath239 ; at ( 6,0 ) @xmath243 ; at ( 4.5,.5)@xmath189 ; at ( 6.5 , .5)@xmath245 ; at ( 5.5,.5)@xmath244 ; ( 1,1 ) circle ( 3 pt ) ; ( 2,0 ) circle ( 3 pt ) ; ( 3,1 ) circle ( 3 pt ) ; ( 5,1 ) circle ( 3 pt ) ; ( 4,0 ) circle ( 3 pt ) ; ( 6,0 ) circle ( 3 pt ) ; ( 7,1 ) circle ( 3 pt ) ; ( 5,-1 ) circle ( 3 pt ) ; [ rem : max ] replacing @xmath127 by @xmath248 in the above argument shows that two paths that are maximal until different vertices at the same level also do not have the same coding by initial segments of length 3 . [ thm : coding ] fix an ordering @xmath47 of the pascal diagram , with path space @xmath25 . suppose @xmath37 , @xmath167 are distinct paths in @xmath25 that are determined by sequences @xmath249 with @xmath47-consistent factoring schemes and have full @xmath150-orbits under @xmath33 ( extended if necessary ) as in proposition [ prop : consistentscheme ] . then the 3-codings of @xmath37 and @xmath167 are not the same . in other words , for such paths the 3-coding is faithful . suppose , to the contrary , that there are two such distinct paths @xmath37 and @xmath167 whose codings by initial segments of length 3 are the same . there exists an @xmath250 such that @xmath251 and @xmath252 share the same minimal path until vertex @xmath174 , for some @xmath253 with @xmath254 , and then follow different edges out of that vertex . replacing @xmath37 and @xmath167 by @xmath251 and @xmath252 , we may assume that @xmath37 and @xmath167 have this property . if @xmath80 is on the left or right side of the diagram , then @xmath37 and @xmath167 are minimal ( or maximal ) to different vertices , and so , by lemma [ block containment ] ( or remark [ rem : max ] respectively ) , this can not happen . thus @xmath255 ; in other words , @xmath80 is an `` internal '' vertex . if the first edges after @xmath80 in @xmath37 and @xmath167 are both maximal , then either @xmath256 contains a maximal path from @xmath20 to @xmath191 and @xmath257 contains a maximal path to @xmath192 , or vice versa . it then follows from remark [ rem : max ] that the 3-codes for @xmath256 and @xmath257 ( and hence for @xmath37 and @xmath167 ) can not be the same . if the first edges after @xmath80 in @xmath37 and @xmath167 are both minimal , then by lemma [ block containment ] @xmath37 and @xmath167 have different 3-codings . so , without loss of generality , we may assume that the first edge in @xmath37 after @xmath80 is maximal and the first in @xmath167 is minimal . assume further that the coordinate axes are chosen so that @xmath37 goes from @xmath80 to @xmath258 and @xmath167 goes from @xmath80 to @xmath259 . now @xmath260 begins with a minimal path from @xmath20 to @xmath192 . so @xmath261 has the same property , where it is possible that @xmath261 is determined by @xmath262 according to proposition [ prop : consistentscheme ] . ( if these paths were at different vertices at level @xmath178 , the lemma would tell us that they had distinct 3-codings . ) so these paths pass through the vertex @xmath192 . note that if @xmath37 is not in the orbit of a maximal path , then there is a finite string of maximal edges in @xmath37 descending from @xmath80 and followed by a single minimal edge from a vertex @xmath263 to a vertex @xmath264 . see figure [ pascal_1 ] . ( 0,1 ) to ( 0,0 ) to ( 1,-1 ) ; ( 1,-1 ) to ( 2,0 ) ; ( 0,0)++(-2,-2)++(1,-1)++(-1,-1)++(2,-2 ) ; ( 0,-6)+(1,-1 ) ; ( 1,-7 ) to ( 2,-6 ) ; ( 2,-6 ) ++(1,1)++(-1,1)++(2,2)++(-2,2 ) ; ( 0,0 ) circle ( 2 pt ) ; ( -1,-1 ) circle ( 2 pt ) ; ( 1,-1 ) circle ( 2 pt ) ; ( 2,0 ) circle ( 2 pt ) ; ( 3,-1 ) circle ( 2pt ) ; ( 0,-6 ) circle ( 2pt ) ; ( 1,-7 ) circle ( 2 pt ) ; ( 2,-6 ) circle ( 2pt ) ; at ( 0,0)@xmath195 ; at ( -.5,-.5)@xmath37 ; at ( .5,-.5)@xmath167 ; at ( 4,-3)@xmath261 ; at ( -1,-1)@xmath258 ; at ( 1,-1)@xmath259 ; at ( 2,0)@xmath192 ; at ( 1,-7)@xmath265 ; at ( 0,-6)@xmath266 ; we claim that the next edge in @xmath167 after @xmath259 is minimal . if this were not the case , then @xmath257 would contain a maximal path from @xmath20 to either @xmath267 or @xmath195 , whereas @xmath256 would contain a maximal path to @xmath191 . see figure [ pascal_2 ] . again , this would mean that the 3-codings for @xmath37 and @xmath167 are different . ( 0,1 ) to ( 0,0 ) to ( 1,-1 ) ; ( 1,-1 ) to ( 2,0 ) ; ( 0,0)++(-1,-1 ) ; ( -2,0 ) to ( 0,-2 ) ; ( 0,-2 ) to ( 1,-1 ) ; at ( .5,-1.5)@xmath167 ; at ( 0,0)@xmath195 ; ( -2,0 ) circle ( 2 pt ) ; ( 1,-1 ) circle ( 2 pt ) ; ( 0,0 ) circle ( 2 pt ) ; ( -1,-1 ) circle ( 2 pt ) ; ( 2,0 ) circle ( 2 pt ) ; ( 3,-1 ) circle ( 2pt ) ; ( 0,-2 ) circle ( 2 pt ) ; at ( -2,0)@xmath191 ; at ( -.5,-.5)@xmath37 ; at ( .5,-.5)@xmath167 ; at ( 2.5,-.5)@xmath261 ; at ( -1,-1)@xmath258 ; at ( 1,-1)@xmath259 ; at ( 2,0)@xmath192 ; ( 2,0 ) to ( 3,-1 ) ; .2 in ( 0,1 ) to ( 0,0 ) to ( 1,-1 ) ; ( 1,-1 ) to ( 2,0 ) ; ( -2,0 ) to ( -1,-1 ) ; ( 0,0)++(-1,-1 ) ; ( 1,-1)to ( 2,-2 ) ; ( 2,-2 ) to ( 3,-1 ) ; ( 3,-1 ) to ( 4,0 ) ; ( 4,0 ) circle ( 2 pt ) ; at ( 4,0)@xmath267 ; ( 0,0 ) circle ( 2 pt ) ; ( -1,-1 ) circle ( 2 pt ) ; ( 1,-1 ) circle ( 2 pt ) ; ( 2,0 ) circle ( 2 pt ) ; ( 3,-1 ) circle ( 2pt ) ; ( 2,-2 ) circle ( 2pt ) ; ( -2,0 ) circle ( 2pt ) ; at ( 0,0)@xmath195 ; at ( 3,-1)@xmath268 ; at ( -.5,-.5)@xmath37 ; at ( .5,-.5)@xmath167 ; at ( 1.5,-1.5)@xmath167 ; at ( 2.5,-.5)@xmath261 ; at ( -1,-1)@xmath258 ; at ( .5,-1)@xmath259 ; at ( 2,0)@xmath192 ; ( 2,0 ) to ( 3,-1 ) ; ( 0,1 ) to ( 0,0 ) to ( 1,-1 ) ; ( 1,-1 ) to ( 2,0 ) ; ( 0,0)++(-1,-1 ) ; ( -2,0 ) to ( -1,-1 ) ; ( -1,-1 ) to ( 0,-2 ) ; ( 0,-2 ) to ( 1,-1 ) ; ( 3,-1 ) to ( 4,0 ) ; ( 4,0 ) circle ( 2pt ) ; at ( 4,0)@xmath267 ; at ( 3.5,-.5)@xmath269 ; at ( .5,-1.5)@xmath167 ; at ( -1.5,-.5)@xmath270 ; ( -2,0 ) circle ( 2 pt ) ; ( 1,-1 ) circle ( 2 pt ) ; ( 0,0 ) circle ( 2 pt ) ; ( -1,-1 ) circle ( 2 pt ) ; ( 2,0 ) circle ( 2 pt ) ; ( 3,-1 ) circle ( 2pt ) ; ( 0,-2 ) circle ( 2 pt ) ; at ( 0,0)@xmath195 ; at ( -2,0)@xmath191 ; at ( -.5,-.5)@xmath37 ; at ( .5,-.5)@xmath167 ; at ( 2.5,-.5)@xmath261 ; at ( -1,-1)@xmath258 ; at ( 1,-1)@xmath259 ; at ( 2,0)@xmath192 ; ( 2,0 ) to ( 3,-1 ) ; .2 in ( 0,1 ) to ( 0,0 ) to ( 1,-1 ) ; ( 1,-1 ) to ( 2,0 ) ; ( 0,0)++(-1,-1 ) ; ( 1,-1)to ( 2,-2 ) ; ( 2,-2 ) to ( 3,-1 ) ; ( 3,-1 ) to ( 4,0 ) ; ( 4,0 ) circle ( 2 pt ) ; at ( 4,0)@xmath267 ; ( 0,0 ) circle ( 2 pt ) ; ( -1,-1 ) circle ( 2 pt ) ; ( 1,-1 ) circle ( 2 pt ) ; ( 2,0 ) circle ( 2 pt ) ; ( 3,-1 ) circle ( 2pt ) ; ( 2,-2 ) circle ( 2pt ) ; at ( 0,0)@xmath195 ; at ( 3,-1)@xmath268 ; at ( -.5,-.5)@xmath37 ; at ( .5,-.5)@xmath167 ; at ( 1.5,-1.5)@xmath167 ; at ( 2.5,-.5)@xmath261 ; at ( -1,-1)@xmath258 ; at ( .5,-1)@xmath259 ; at ( 2,0)@xmath192 ; ( 2,0 ) to ( 3,-1 ) ; at ( 3.5 , -.5)@xmath179 ; so the next edge in @xmath167 after @xmath259 is minimal . letting @xmath271 it follows that @xmath269 contains a minimal path from @xmath20 to @xmath267 , whereas @xmath270 contains a minimal path to either @xmath191 or @xmath192 . see figure [ pascal_3 ] . this is ruled out by applying the lemma to @xmath269 and @xmath270 . [ cor : recognizability ] for each ordering @xmath47 of the pascal graph @xmath5 and each path @xmath159 , the 3-coding @xmath272 has a unique @xmath47-consistent factoring scheme . fix a particular ordering @xmath47 on the pascal graph @xmath5 . that for each @xmath273 , @xmath274 has such a natural factoring scheme is clear from the definitions of @xmath274 and the basic blocks @xmath275 , as mentioned previously . by proposition [ prop : consistentscheme ] there is a unique path that has the same 3-coding and natural factoring scheme . another factoring of the 3-coding of @xmath37 would determine a different path which would have the same 3-coding as @xmath37 , contradicting the theorem . [ rem : recognizability ] the preceding corollary helps to clarify the relationship among paths , factorizations of codings , and factorizations of basic blocks . suppose we have an ordering @xmath47 on _ any _ bratteli diagram and know that there is a subset @xmath48 of the path space @xmath25 such that for each path @xmath159 and each @xmath132 the @xmath0-coding @xmath68 admits a unique factorization into basic blocks of level @xmath15 . ( perhaps @xmath48 has measure 0 for each fully supported ergodic invariant measure . ) suppose further that the basic blocks at each level are distinct . then it follows that distinct paths in @xmath276 have distinct @xmath0-codings , since , as in the argument above , the factorization would determine the path . further , each basic block @xmath277 would have a unique factorization into basic blocks of level @xmath15 for each @xmath15 with @xmath278 , although basic blocks of level @xmath73 might not have unique factorizations . ( the central symbol specifies the path up to the root and hence a preferred factorization of the basic blocks of levels @xmath73 . ) thus under such hypotheses we would have unique factorization of basic blocks of levels greater than or equal to @xmath0 , as shown for the case of the pascal diagram , @xmath279-codings , and special orderings in lemma [ lem : decomp ] . recall that for a fixed ordering @xmath47 , @xmath71 denotes the subshift on @xmath55 symbols generated by coding paths according to their first @xmath0 edges . this is a legitimate topological dynamical system a compact metric space together with a homeomorphism . ( we use the metric @xmath280 ) . by theorem [ thm : coding ] the coding is essentially faithful if @xmath281 . denote by @xmath282 the set of bounded complex - valued functions on @xmath121 whose set of continuity points is residual . in order to prove that @xmath71 is topologically weakly mixing , we follow the plan in @xcite to check the condition of keynes and robertson @xcite : a topological dynamical system which is closed ergodic " ( there is an invariant borel probability measure on the space for which every closed invariant set has measure 0 or 1 ) is topologically weakly mixing if and only if every @xmath283 for which there is @xmath284 such that @xmath285 everywhere must be constant on a dense set . for this purpose we have to go beyond the polynomial equidistribution theorem of weyl and quote instead a theorem of f. hahn @xcite . in our situation @xmath71 is closed ergodic , since there are fully supported ergodic measures on @xmath121 ( the measures @xmath286 , mentioned above ) . our system is topologically ergodic ( there exist dense orbits ) . we aim to prove that if @xmath283 and @xmath284 satisfy @xmath285 everywhere , then @xmath287 . then it will follow from another theorem of keynes and robertson @xcite ( since then @xmath288 everywhere ) that @xmath289 is constant on a dense set , and consequently the system is topologically weakly mixing . we also use the fact ( * ? ? ? * lemma 4.18 ) that if @xmath283 and @xmath284 satisfy @xmath285 everywhere , then every point which has both its forward and backward orbit dense is a point of continuity of @xmath289 . another essential ingredient is the following extension of the kink lemma " of @xcite taking into account the unknown ordering of edges . [ lem : kink ] let @xmath25 denote , as above , the set of infinite directed paths on the pascal graph , and fix an ordering @xmath47 . let @xmath290 , with @xmath291 denoting the edge of @xmath37 from level @xmath292 to level @xmath1 , be a path to a vertex @xmath293 , with @xmath294 and @xmath295 , which continues to the vertex @xmath296 in such a way that the edge @xmath297 of @xmath37 that enters @xmath296 is minimal . let @xmath298 and denote by @xmath299 the edge with source @xmath293 that is not equal to @xmath300 . we have to consider eight cases , labeled by triples @xmath301 , depending on whether @xmath300 is maximal ( @xmath302max ) or minimal ( @xmath302min ) , @xmath299 is maximal ( @xmath303max ) or minimal ( @xmath303min ) , and @xmath300 has range @xmath304 ( @xmath305lr ) or @xmath306 ( @xmath305rl ) . let @xmath307 then @xmath308 and @xmath37 agree on their first @xmath15 edges . consequently , if @xmath98 is a path that begins with the minimal path to @xmath293 , @xmath309 is a path that begins with the maximal path to @xmath293 , @xmath310 , and @xmath311 , then @xmath312 . let @xmath309 denote the path which is maximal to the vertex @xmath293 and agrees with @xmath37 after level @xmath313 , so that @xmath314 for some @xmath315 . suppose first that the edge @xmath300 is maximal and @xmath299 is minimal . then in both cases ( max , min , lr ) and ( max , min , rl ) ( whether @xmath300 has range @xmath304 or @xmath306 ) @xmath316 begins with the minimal path to @xmath293 . then choosing @xmath317 so that @xmath318 yields that @xmath319 agrees with @xmath37 on their first @xmath15 edges . then @xmath320 has the stated property . see figure [ fig : lem4.1 ] . ( 0,0)++(-2,3)++(1,1)++(-1,2)++(1,1)++(-1,1 ) ; ( 0,0)++(2,2)++(-1,1)++(1,2)++(-1,2)++(1,1 ) ; ( 0,0)+(-2,-2 ) ; ( -2,-2)++(2,-2 ) ; ( 0,0)+(2,-2 ) ; ( 2,-2)+(-2,-2 ) ; ( 0,0 ) circle ( 3 pt ) ; ( -2,-2 ) circle ( 3 pt ) ; ( 2,-2 ) circle ( 3 pt ) ; ( 0,-4 ) circle ( 3 pt ) ; at ( 0,0)@xmath293 ; at ( -2,-2)@xmath304 ; at ( 2,-2)@xmath306 ; at ( 0,-4)@xmath296 ; at ( -2.5,4 ) @xmath37 ; at ( 3,4 ) @xmath321 ; at ( -1,-1)@xmath300 ; at ( 1,-1)@xmath299 ; the other cases are similar but differ in the details , and the particular values of @xmath322 that we find are important for the following theorem , so we go through them all . suppose now that the edge @xmath299 is maximal and @xmath300 is maximal and has range @xmath304 ( case ( max , max , lr ) ) . in this case @xmath316 begins with the minimal path to the vertex @xmath323 followed by the minimal edge to @xmath306 and the maximal edge to @xmath296 . then @xmath324 begins with the maximal path to @xmath323 , and @xmath325 begins with the minimal path to @xmath293 followed by the maximal edge to @xmath306 . choose @xmath317 so that @xmath318 . then @xmath326 agrees with @xmath37 on their first @xmath15 edges . we have @xmath327 , so @xmath328 acts as stated . if the edge @xmath299 is maximal and @xmath300 is maximal and has range @xmath306 ( case ( max , max , rl ) ) , the argument is the same as the immediately preceding one , except that @xmath209 is replaced by @xmath329 . namely , @xmath316 begins with the minimal path to @xmath330 , @xmath331 begins with the maximal path to @xmath330 , @xmath325 begins with the minimal path to @xmath293 followed by the maximal edge to @xmath304 . again choose @xmath317 so that @xmath318 . then @xmath326 and @xmath37 agree on their first @xmath15 edges , so we obtain @xmath332 . consider now the case ( min , max , lr ) . then @xmath316 begins with the minimal path to @xmath330 , @xmath331 begins with the maximal path to @xmath330 , and @xmath333 begins with the minimal path to @xmath323 followed by a minimal and then a maximal edge . then @xmath334 begins with the minimal path to @xmath293 extended by two maximal edges . thus choosing @xmath317 so that @xmath318 yields that @xmath335 agrees with @xmath37 on the first @xmath15 edges .. next , consider the case ( min , max , rl ) . then @xmath316 is minimal to @xmath323 , @xmath336 is maximal to @xmath323 , and @xmath337 is minimal to @xmath304 extended by a maximal edge . then @xmath338 is maximal to @xmath330 , so that @xmath339 is minimal to @xmath293 . thus if we choose @xmath114 so that @xmath318 , we will have @xmath340 and @xmath37 agreeing on their first @xmath15 edges . now consider the case ( min , min , lr ) . then @xmath316 starts with the minimal path to @xmath330 , @xmath331 starts with the maximal path to @xmath330 , @xmath325 is minimal to @xmath293 followed by a minimal and then a maximal path ; and if we choose @xmath114 so that @xmath318 , then @xmath341 and @xmath37 agree on the first @xmath15 edges . the final case is ( min , min , rl ) . then @xmath316 is minimal to @xmath323 and extends from there by a maximal edge followed by a minimal edge . then @xmath336 is maximal to @xmath323 , from where it extends with a maximal and then a minimal edge . thus @xmath325 is minimal to @xmath293 and extends by the minimal edge @xmath299 followed by a maximal edge ; and , if we choose @xmath114 so that @xmath318 , then @xmath342 and @xmath37 agree on their first @xmath15 edges . the final statement in the lemma follows from the fact that @xmath343 and @xmath344 agree on their first @xmath126 edges for @xmath345 . [ thm : weakmixing ] for each ordering and each @xmath50 , the subshift @xmath71 is topologically weakly mixing . fix an ordering @xmath47 . we deal only with paths in @xmath25 whose orbit does not contain any paths that are eventually diagonal or eventually consist of only maximal or only minimal edges . by proposition [ prop : maxpaths ] the set of such paths has measure 1 for each ergodic @xmath127-invariant probability measure on @xmath25 . the coding @xmath68 of any such path @xmath37 has both its forward and backward orbit dense in @xmath121 and hence , as noted above , is a point of continuity of any eigenfunction @xmath283 . suppose that @xmath346 , and @xmath285 everywhere on @xmath121 ; we want to show that then @xmath347 . fix a point @xmath68 that is the coding of a path @xmath37 as described above and hence is a point of continuity of @xmath289 . for each @xmath15 let @xmath348 denote the vertex through which @xmath37 passes at level @xmath15 , i.e. the range of the edge @xmath349 . for each @xmath15 , the path @xmath37 can be modified if necessary below level @xmath15 to a path @xmath167 that satisfies the hypotheses of lemma [ lem : kink ] , is not eventually diagonal , and does not eventually consist of only maximal or minimal edges . this determines @xmath350 so that @xmath351 , and @xmath37 agree on their first @xmath15 edges , and @xmath352 . since @xmath353 and @xmath354 are unbounded this implies that @xmath355 as @xmath356 . since @xmath357 for all @xmath15 , we have @xmath358 as @xmath359 . in particular @xmath360 . suppose that @xmath361 is a root of unity , so that @xmath362 for two relatively prime integers @xmath94 and @xmath97 . let @xmath363 be a prime that divides @xmath97 . in the pascal triangle we can find infinitely many @xmath15 for which there is a @xmath209 such that none of @xmath364 , @xmath365 , @xmath366 is divisible by @xmath363 . for example , by lemma 5.1 of @xcite @xmath367 for @xmath368 . therefore , for each @xmath115 the entire row @xmath369 , is not divisible by @xmath363 , and in the preceding row there are many entries @xmath370 , that are not divisible by @xmath363 as well as many that are , so choosing @xmath371 and @xmath209 so that @xmath372 is not divisible by @xmath363 but @xmath373 is divisible by @xmath363 will do . ( if @xmath372 is not divisible by @xmath363 , then neither is @xmath374 , while if @xmath373 is divisible by @xmath363 , then so is @xmath375 . ) we can arrange that our path @xmath37 hits such vertices for infinitely many @xmath15 , and then @xmath376 for all of these values of @xmath15 , contradicting that @xmath358 . thus there are no roots of unity besides @xmath279 among the eigenvalues of @xmath69 . suppose now that @xmath361 is not a root of unity , say @xmath377 for an irrational @xmath378 . according to the theorem of f. hahn ( * ? ? ? * theorem 5 ) the transformation @xmath379 ( mod @xmath279 ) on the infinite torus is minimal , in fact strictly ergodic , with haar measure the unique invariant probability measure . then the orbit of @xmath380 is dense , and @xmath381 . we use this result to construct a continuity point @xmath68 of @xmath289 that is the coding of a path @xmath37 such that , denoting by @xmath348 the vertex through which @xmath37 passes at level @xmath15 , there are infinitely many @xmath15 for which all of @xmath382 , and @xmath383\beta \mod 1 $ ] are a fixed distance from @xmath89 and @xmath279 , again making it impossible that @xmath358 . given an initial segment of @xmath37 ending at a vertex @xmath384 , extend @xmath37 several steps so as to use both some maximal and some minimal edges as well as some edges that increase the first ( @xmath138 ) coordinate and the second ( @xmath209 ) coordinate , arriving at a vertex @xmath385 . then add edges that increase the @xmath138 coordinate until we arrive at a vertex @xmath293 for which @xmath386 ( say @xmath387 , etc . , with @xmath388 denoting @xmath389 ) . then @xmath390 and @xmath391 are in the interval @xmath392 , while @xmath393\beta \mod 1 $ ] is in the interval @xmath394 . continue , making it impossible that @xmath358 . according to the theorem of downarowicz and maass @xcite mentioned above , every minimal adic system with finite topological rank is either expansive or topologically conjugate to an odometer . for systems with a bounded number of vertices per level some sufficient conditions for topological conjugacy to an odometer are known ( see the remarks in the introduction ) . in this section we give a necessary and sufficient condition for a fairly general adic system to be topologically conjugate to an odometer . the condition is then used to determine when , with probability 1 , an adic system with a random ordering , or an adic system constructed according to a random process , is topologically conjugate to an odometer . in this section we deal with an arbitrary bratteli diagram @xmath395 . as usual the vertices are arranged into levels , so that @xmath396 , @xmath397 , and there are directed edges from each level to the next : there are a range map @xmath1 and a source map @xmath115 from @xmath7 to @xmath398 such that @xmath399 for all @xmath93 , @xmath400 for all @xmath93 , @xmath401 for all @xmath402 , and @xmath403 for all @xmath404 . we assume that @xmath405 consists of a single vertex , @xmath406 , and @xmath407 for all @xmath15 . the _ path space _ @xmath25 is the space of infinite paths @xmath408 such that @xmath409 and @xmath410 for all @xmath138 . to avoid degenerate cases , we assume that @xmath25 with the usual metric ( in which two infinite paths are close if they agree on long initial segments ) is homeomorphic to the cantor set . an _ ordering _ @xmath47 of the diagram is an assignment of a linear order to the set @xmath411 of edges entering each vertex @xmath84 . @xmath412 consists of the set of paths all of whose edges are maximal in the ordering @xmath47 , and @xmath413 of all the paths all of whose edges are minimal . as with the pascal diagram , the ordering @xmath47 determines the adic transformation @xmath414 , which is a homeomorphism . see @xcite , @xcite , or @xcite for the definitions of _ telescoping _ and _ isomorphism _ for diagrams and ordered diagrams . _ equivalence _ of diagrams or ordered diagrams is the equivalence relation generated by isomorphism and telescoping . two diagrams @xmath415 and @xmath416 are diagram equivalent if and only if there is a diagram @xmath417 such that telescoping @xmath417 to odd levels yields a telescoping of one of @xmath418 and telescoping @xmath417 to even levels yields a telescoping of the other one ; similarly for ordered diagrams . if two ordered diagrams are equivalent , then the topological dynamical systems that they define by means of their adic transformations are topologically conjugate . recall that a bratteli diagram is called _ simple _ if there is a telescoping for which every pair of vertices @xmath419 and @xmath420 there is an edge between @xmath154 and @xmath421 . that the converse holds also , for simple adic systems that are properly ordered ( with unique maximal and minimal paths ) , follows from theorem 4.4 of @xcite . ( for suppose that simple and properly ordered diagrams @xmath422 and @xmath423 determine adic systems @xmath424 and @xmath425 , respectively , that are topologically conjugate under an adic - commuting homeomorphism @xmath426 . each @xmath427 has a natural sequence of kakutani - rokhlin partitions @xmath428 corresponding to its diagram structure . then @xmath429 is a sequence of kakutani - rokhlin partitions for @xmath424 that is admissible as in theorem 4.2 of @xcite . this sequence determines @xmath423 according to the process in @xcite , so by theorem 4.4 of @xcite @xmath422 and @xmath423 are diagram equivalent . ) ( note that in the proof of theorem 4.4 of @xcite the tops @xmath430 and @xmath431 of the tower diagrams have the property that given @xmath15 we can find @xmath114 such that @xmath432 is contained in @xmath430 , and vice versa . ) an _ odometer _ is any topological dynamical system that is topologically conjugate to the system defined by the adic transformation on the path space of an ordered diagram which has exactly one vertex at every level . ( 0,1 ) (1.4,.4 ) ( 3,0 ) ; ( 0,1 ) ( 1.6,.6 ) ( 3,0 ) ; ( 0,1 ) ( 1,0 ) ; ( 2,1 ) (2.4,.4 ) ( 3,0 ) ; ( 2,1 ) ( 2.6,.6 ) ( 3,0 ) ; ( 2,1 ) ( 1,0 ) ; ( 4,1 ) (3.6,.4 ) ( 3,0 ) ; ( 4,1 ) ( 3.4,.6 ) ( 3,0 ) ; ( 4,1 ) ( 1,0 ) ; ( 0,1 ) circle ( 1 pt ) ; ( 2,1 ) circle ( 1 pt ) ; ( 4,1 ) circle ( 1 pt ) ; ( 1,0 ) circle ( 1 pt ) ; ( 3,0 ) circle ( 1 pt ) ; at ( .8,.2)2 ; at ( 1.2,.2)1 ; at ( 1.5,.15)3 ; at ( 2.2,.2)2 ; at ( 2.5,.2)5 ; at ( 2.65,.25)1 ; at ( 2.85,.225)4 ; at ( 3.15,.25)3 ; at ( 3.4,.25)6 ; at ( 0,1)@xmath266 ; at ( 2,1)@xmath265 ; at ( 4,1)@xmath433 ; at ( 1,0)@xmath434 ; at ( 3,0)@xmath435 ; for each @xmath15 and each @xmath436 , there is an associated coding in terms of vertices in @xmath18 . ( this is the `` morphism read on @xmath19 '' in @xcite . ) more precisely , if @xmath437 , where the subscripts correspond directly to the ordering given by @xmath47 , then the coding of @xmath438 by vertices in @xmath18 is given by @xmath439 . we call @xmath440 and the level @xmath15 _ uniformly ordered _ if there is a string @xmath441 , with each @xmath442 in @xmath443 , such that for every @xmath438 in @xmath444 , @xmath445 for some @xmath446 . see figure [ uniformlyordered ] . note that if any level has only one vertex , then it is automatically uniformly ordered . for a bratteli - vershik system @xmath395 , define an _ ordered shape at level @xmath15 _ to consist of @xmath18 , @xmath444 , @xmath440 , and a partial order on @xmath440 which is a total order on each @xmath447 . we say that a shape is _ uniformly ordered _ if @xmath440 is uniformly ordered . [ tpuo ] if a diagram @xmath395 with an ordering @xmath47 has infinitely many levels for which @xmath17 is uniformly ordered , then ( 1 ) there is a telescoping @xmath448 of @xmath449 for which every level is uniformly ordered , and ( 2 ) @xmath395 is simple and properly ordered . first note that if an ordered bratteli diagram is telescoped from level @xmath450 to level @xmath451 , the new coding of the vertices at level @xmath451 in terms of the vertices at level @xmath450 results from decomposing the original @xmath452 coding of vertices in @xmath453 by vertices in @xmath454 in an inductive manner into a level @xmath450 coding . then note that if @xmath455 and @xmath17 is uniformly ordered , then the new set of edges arising from telescoping from level @xmath450 to level @xmath451 will be uniformly ordered . indeed , since all vertices @xmath436 have codings @xmath445 in terms of the vertices at level @xmath119 , decomposing the level @xmath452 codings of vertices in @xmath453 into level @xmath119 codings will lead to repeated concatenations of @xmath80 . furthermore , the ordering @xmath47 will lead to a unique decomposition of @xmath80 in terms of vertices at level @xmath450 , and therefore the new set of edges will be uniformly ordered . see figure [ everyleveluo ] . in order for a level to be uniformly ordered , every vertex in @xmath456 must connect to every vertex in @xmath457 . hence any diagram with infinitely many uniformly ordered levels is simple . for every @xmath15 there is a unique vertex @xmath458 in @xmath459 such that every edge in @xmath460 which is maximal has @xmath458 as its source . therefore any path in @xmath461 must go through these vertices , and there is a unique path which travels along maximal edges at every level . ( 0,1 ) (1.4,.4 ) ( 3,0 ) ; ( 0,1 ) ( 1.6,.6 ) ( 3,0 ) ; ( 0,1 ) ( 1,0 ) ; ( 2,1 ) (2.4,.4 ) ( 3,0 ) ; ( 2,1 ) ( 2.6,.6 ) ( 3,0 ) ; ( 2,1 ) ( 1,0 ) ; ( 4,1 ) (3.6,.4 ) ( 3,0 ) ; ( 4,1 ) ( 3.4,.6 ) ( 3,0 ) ; ( 4,1 ) ( 1,0 ) ; ( 1,2 ) ( 0,1 ) ; ( 1,2 ) ( 2,1 ) ; ( 3,2 ) ( 2,1 ) ; ( 3,2 ) ( 4,1 ) ; ( 1,2 ) circle ( 1 pt ) ; ( 3,2 ) circle ( 1 pt ) ; ( 0,1 ) circle ( 1 pt ) ; ( 2,1 ) circle ( 1 pt ) ; ( 4,1 ) circle ( 1 pt ) ; ( 1,0 ) circle ( 1 pt ) ; ( 3,0 ) circle ( 1 pt ) ; at ( .8,.2)2 ; at ( 1.2,.2)1 ; at ( 1.5,.15)3 ; at ( 2.2,.2)2 ; at ( 2.5,.2)5 ; at ( 2.65,.25)1 ; at ( 2.85,.225)4 ; at ( 3.15,.25)3 ; at ( 3.4,.25)6 ; at ( 1,2)@xmath94 ; at ( 3,2)@xmath97 ; at ( 0,1)@xmath94 ; at ( 2,1)@xmath462 ; at ( 4,1)@xmath97 ; at ( 1,0)@xmath463 ; at ( 3,0)@xmath464 ; it is possible for two non - uniformly ordered levels to telescope to one that is uniformly ordered . indeed , suppose that @xmath465 and the level @xmath119 coding of vertices at level @xmath15 is such that @xmath466 for @xmath467 in @xmath444 . then suppose that the level @xmath15 coding of vertices in @xmath468 is such that the only difference in the codings of different vertices is that @xmath469 and @xmath470 are interchanged in two codings . then neither @xmath17 nor @xmath471 is uniformly ordered . however , once one telescopes between levels @xmath119 and @xmath131 , the new set of edges will be uniformly ordered . see figure [ nuo ] . ( 0,1 ) ; ( 2,2 ) ( 0,1 ) ( 1,0 ) ; ( 0,1 ) ( 3,0 ) ; ( 4,2 ) ( 2,1) ( 1,0 ) ; ( 4,2 ) ( 4,1 ) ; ( 2,2 ) ( 2,1 ) ; ( 2,2 ) ( 3,0 ) ; ( 0,1 ) ( 1,0 ) ; ( 0,2 ) circle ( 2 pt ) ; ( 2,2 ) circle ( 2 pt ) ; ( 4,2 ) circle ( 2 pt ) ; ( 0,1 ) circle ( 2 pt ) ; ( 2,1 ) circle ( 2 pt ) ; ( 4,1 ) circle ( 2 pt ) ; ( 1,0 ) circle ( 2 pt ) ; ( 3,0 ) circle ( 2 pt ) ; at ( 0,2)@xmath266 ; at ( 2,2)@xmath265 ; at ( 4,2)@xmath433 ; at ( 0,1)@xmath472 ; at ( 2,1)@xmath473 ; at ( 4,1)@xmath474 ; at ( 1,0)@xmath475 ; at ( 3,0)@xmath476 ; [ uoimpliesodometer ] if an ordered bratteli diagram @xmath477 has a telescoping for which there are infinitely many uniformly ordered levels then the associated adic system is topologically conjugate to an odometer . conversely , any simple properly ordered bratteli diagram @xmath478 that is topologically conjugate to an odometer has a telescoping for which there are infinitely many uniformly ordered levels . suppose that we have a diagram @xmath479 for which there is a telescoping with infinitely many uniformly ordered levels . by lemma [ tpuo ] we may assume that the diagram is uniformly ordered at every level @xmath139 ; also note that the diagram is simple and properly ordered . one can see then that all the @xmath0-codings ( coding @xmath33-orbits according to the initial path segments of length @xmath0 ) are periodic , so that the system is not expansive and hence , by @xcite , is topologically conjugate to an odometer in case the system has finite topological rank . we give here an explicit proof in the general case by constructing an intermediate ordered bratteli diagram , @xmath480 , with the property that telescoping to odd levels yields the given diagram , @xmath417 , and telescoping to even levels yields a system with a single vertex at every level . thus @xmath417 is equivalent to the diagram of an odometer , and hence its associated topological dynamical system is topologically conjugate to an odometer . to construct @xmath480 , for each @xmath16 let @xmath481 and @xmath482 . let @xmath483 . for every @xmath16 , denote the single vertex in @xmath484 by @xmath485 and set up a one - to - one correspondence between @xmath486 and @xmath19 . fix @xmath16 . since @xmath417 is uniformly ordered at level @xmath131 , there is a string @xmath487 with entries from @xmath444 such that for each @xmath438 in @xmath468 the coding of @xmath438 by vertices in @xmath444 is @xmath445 . to define @xmath488 let @xmath489 , label the edges @xmath490 in @xmath491 so that for each @xmath138 @xmath492 is the vertex @xmath493 in @xmath486 which corresponds to @xmath494 , and order these edges according to their labels . to define @xmath495 , note that each @xmath496 corresponds to a @xmath497 ; we let the number of edges from @xmath485 to @xmath493 be @xmath498 for the @xmath438 corresponding to @xmath493 and order these edges arbitrarily . then telescoping @xmath480 to odd levels yields @xmath417 , and telescoping to even levels yields a system with just one vertex at every level , an odometer . see figure [ i d ] . conversely , suppose that @xmath479 is a simple properly ordered diagram whose associated adic system is topologically conjugate to an odometer . as mentioned above , then the diagram is equivalent to an odometer : there is an intermediate diagram @xmath499 , which when telescoped to odd levels yields a telescoping @xmath500 of @xmath417 and when telescoped to even levels yields a system with just one vertex at each level , or vice versa . for each @xmath15 , @xmath501 and hence level @xmath502 of @xmath480 is automatically uniformly ordered . then as in the proof of lemma [ tpuo ] , the telescoping of @xmath480 from level @xmath503 to level @xmath504 will yield a set of edges whose ranges form a uniformly ordered level . therefore in @xmath500 every level @xmath17 must be uniformly ordered . ( 0,0 ) circle ( 4 pt ) ; ( 0,2 ) circle ( 4 pt ) ; ( 0,4 ) circle ( 4 pt ) ; ( 0,6 ) circle ( 4 pt ) ; ( 2,0 ) circle ( 4 pt ) ; ( 2,4 ) circle ( 4 pt ) ; ( 2,7 ) circle ( 4 pt ) ; ( 4,0 ) circle ( 4 pt ) ; ( 4,2 ) circle ( 4 pt ) ; ( 4,4 ) circle ( 4 pt ) ; ( 10,0 ) circle ( 4 pt ) ; ( 10,2 ) circle ( 4 pt ) ; ( 10,4 ) circle ( 4 pt ) ; ( 10,6 ) circle ( 4 pt ) ; ( 12,0 ) circle ( 4 pt ) ; ( 12,1 ) circle ( 4 pt ) ; ( 12,3 ) circle ( 4 pt ) ; ( 12,4 ) circle ( 4 pt ) ; ( 12,5 ) circle ( 4 pt ) ; ( 12,7 ) circle ( 4 pt ) ; ( 14,0 ) circle ( 4 pt ) ; ( 14,2 ) circle ( 4 pt ) ; ( 14,4 ) circle ( 4 pt ) ; ( 14,6 ) circle ( 4 pt ) ; ( 20,1 ) circle ( 4 pt ) ; ( 20,3 ) circle ( 4 pt ) ; ( 20,5 ) circle ( 4 pt ) ; ( 20,7 ) circle ( 4 pt ) ; ( 2,7)(0,6)(0,4)(0,2)(0,0 ) ; ( 2,7)(4,6)(4,4)(4,2 ) ; ( 0,6)(4,4)(0,2)(2,0 ) ; ( 4,6)(0,4)(4,2)(0,0 ) ; ( 0,6 ) ( .5,5 ) ( 2,4 ) ; ( 0,6 ) ( 1.5,5 ) ( 2,4 ) ; ( 4,6 ) ( 2.5,5 ) ( 2,4 ) ; ( 4,6 ) ( 3.5,5 ) ( 2,4 ) ; ( 2,4)(0,2 ) ; ( 2,4)(4,2)(2,0 ) ; ( 0,2 ) ( 2.5,1 ) ( 4,0 ) ; ( 0,2 ) ( 1.5,1 ) ( 4,0 ) ; ( 4,2 ) ( 4.25,1 ) ( 4,0 ) ; ( 4,2 ) ( 3.75,1 ) ( 4,0 ) ; ( 12,7)(10,6)(12,5)(10,4)(12,3)(10,2)(12,1)(10,0 ) ; ( 12,7)(14,6)(12,5)(14,4)(12,3)(14,2)(12,1)(12,0 ) ; ( 12,5)(11.75,4.5)(12,4 ) ; ( 12,5)(12.25,4.5)(12,4)(12,3 ) ; ( 12,1)(12.75,.25)(14,0 ) ; ( 12,1)(13.25,.75)(14,0 ) ; ( 20,7)(19.75,6)(20,5)(19.5,4)(20,3)(19.75,2)(20,1 ) ; ( 20,7)(20.25,6)(20,5)(20.5,4)(20,3)(20.25,2)(20,1 ) ; ( 20,5)(20.2,4)(20,3 ) ; ( 20,5)(19.8,4)(20,3 ) ; at(2,7)@xmath417 ; at ( 12,7)@xmath480 ; at(20,7)odometer ; we are seeking conditions that will allow one to determine when bv systems are expansive or not , conjugate to odometers or not , and of finite topological rank or not . as mentioned above , downarowicz and maass @xcite ( see also @xcite ) showed that every properly ordered minimal bv system of finite topological rank is either expansive or else conjugate to an odometer . gjerde and johansen @xcite give an example of a simple properly ordered bv system that is not expansive , yet not conjugate to an odometer , thus necessarily of infinite topological rank . we note in the following proposition that the key properties of this example are enjoyed by a wide class of systems , which we call `` standard nonexpansive '' , and which therefore are nonexpansive and , by essentially the same argument as in @xcite , not of finite topological rank , in particular not conjugate to odometers . recall that given @xmath505 , every path in an ordered bv system @xmath479 has a @xmath28-coding of its orbit according to the partition @xmath506 into cylinder sets to level @xmath28 . for each vertex @xmath507 , the edges with range @xmath80 are assigned labels indicating their positions in the ordering determined by @xmath47 . so any path @xmath37 has an infinite _ sequence of edge labels _ associated with it . specifically , the @xmath138th entry in the sequence is the label assigned to the @xmath138th edge of @xmath37 . we say that the bv system is _ standard nonexpansive _ if for every natural number @xmath28 there exist distinct paths @xmath508 and @xmath509 that are assigned the same sequence of edge labels , agree from the root to some level @xmath510 , and at any level the vertices met by the two paths have the same basic block in the @xmath28-coding . in this case , @xmath508 and @xmath509 have the same @xmath28-coding . standard nonexpansive implies expansive . [ sne ] every standard nonexpansive simple properly ordered bv system has infinite rank . by @xcite , for any bv system @xmath417 that is conjugate to the odometer there is a bv system @xmath480 that telescopes on odd levels to a telescoping of @xmath417 and on even levels to a telescoping of the odometer . there is then a telescoping of @xmath417 in which every vertex is uniformly ordered . this , however , can not occur when there are paths with the same sequence of edge labels . so if @xmath417 is standard nonexpansive , then it not conjugate to the odometer . it then follows , by @xcite , that @xmath417 does not have finite topological rank . we consider now what might happen if a diagram is ordered randomly , or if a diagram is somehow chosen at random . suppose that we are given a simple diagram @xmath449 as above . denote the set of orderings of the edges entering a vertex @xmath84 by @xmath511 . the set of all orderings of @xmath417 is @xmath512 . we consider probability measures @xmath513 on @xmath514 , for example the uniform and independent measure @xmath515 which is the product over all @xmath80 of the uniform measures on the discrete spaces @xmath511 . for each @xmath516 let @xmath517 denote the set of orderings of @xmath417 which are uniformly ordered at level @xmath15 , and let @xmath518 denote the set of orderings which have infinitely many uniformly ordered levels . by the preceding theorem , if @xmath519 then an ordering selected randomly according to @xmath513 will with probability 1 produce an adic system topologically conjugate to an odometer . [ ex : odometerprob ] suppose that @xmath417 is a diagram such that for every @xmath171 there is an @xmath322 such that the number of edges between every pair of vertices @xmath520 and @xmath521 is @xmath322 . ( then @xmath417 is simple . ) . then there are @xmath523 orderings of the edges into each vertex at level @xmath15 and thus @xmath524 ways to order the unordered shape at level @xmath15 . there are @xmath523 uniform orderings at level @xmath15 , since we must have the same ordering at each vertex on a fixed level . by the borel - cantelli lemma , if @xmath525 then @xmath526 , and so with probability 1 the system is topologically conjugate to an odometer . for example , if the @xmath322 and @xmath527 are bounded , and @xmath417 is as described , then selecting orderings uniformly and independently yields an odometer with probability 1 . this is consistent with corollary 5.3 of @xcite , according to which a diagram with bounded number of vertices and edges per level will have a `` perfect '' ordering ( an ordering which admits a vershik map as a homeomorphism ) with probability 1 . [ ex : odometer2 ] we can also consider assembling a random ordered diagram from a sequence of shapes , that fit together , generated by a stochastic process . generalizing the definition above , define an _ ordered shape _ @xmath528 to be a bipartite directed graph together with a partial order on its set of edges such that ( 1 ) the vertex set is the disjoint union of two finite sets @xmath529 and @xmath530 ; ( 2 ) for each @xmath531 and @xmath532 ; ( 3 ) for each @xmath533 is a total order on @xmath534 ; ( 4 ) for @xmath535 with @xmath536 , the edges in @xmath537 and @xmath538 are not comparable . let @xmath539 be the set of sequences of ordered shapes @xmath540 , such that @xmath541 for all @xmath15 , so that the shapes can fit together " . if @xmath513 is a probability measure on @xmath539 that assigns full measure to the set of sequences which have infinitely many uniformly ordered shapes , then constructing an adic system at random with respect to @xmath513 produces an odometer with probability 1 . for example , if @xmath513 is an ergodic shift - invariant probability measure on @xmath539 such that @xmath542 , then by the poincar recurrence theorem @xmath543 will have infinitely many uniformly ordered shapes and hence will describe an odometer . for a subshift @xmath544 , denote by @xmath545 the _ language _ of @xmath546 , that is , the set of finite blocks seen in sequences in @xmath546 . define for each ordering @xmath47 of the pascal graph @xmath5 the subshift @xmath547 to consist of all doubly infinite sequences , each of whose subblocks can be found in the 1-coding of some @xmath60 ( the set of infinite paths on the pascal graph ) for the ordering @xmath47 , and define the big subshift " @xmath548 by @xmath549 . equivalently , we can define the big subshift @xmath550 to be the closure of the union over all orderings @xmath47 of @xmath551 : @xmath552 what is the asymptotic complexity of @xmath550 ? what are other dynamical properties of @xmath553 ? is this system topologically transitive ( i.e. , does it have a dense orbit ) ? are there periodic points ? recall the basic blocks @xmath554 defined above . basic blocks are determined by the orderings on the edges above them . see figure [ fig : determineblocks ] . ( 3,3)(4,2)(6,4)(5,5 ) ; ( 5,5 ) ( 0,0 ) ; ( 5,5 ) ( 10,0 ) ; ( 4,2 ) circle ( 2 pt ) ; at ( 4,2 ) @xmath8 ; ( 6,4) ( 4,2 ) ; ( 3,3) ( 4,2 ) ; however , a block may be generated by different orderings . for example , there exist two distinct orderings , @xmath555 and @xmath556 such that @xmath557 . this can continue throughout the diagrams . see figure [ fig : differentblocks ] . in 0, ... ,6 in 0 , ... , ( 2 * -,- ) coordinate ( v ) ; ( v ) circle ( 3 pt ) ; ( 0,0 ) ++(6,-6 ) ; ( 0,0)++(-6,-6 ) ; ( 1,-1 ) ++(-1,-1);(0,-2 ) to ( -1,-3);(-1,-3 ) to ( -2,-4);(-2,-4 ) to ( -3,-5 ) ; ( -1,-1 ) + + ( 2,-2 ) ; ( 2,-2 ) ++(-3,-3);(-1,-5 ) to ( -2,-6 ) ; ( -2,-2)++(1,-1);(-1,-3)++(1,-1 ) ; ( -3,-3)++(2,-2 ) ; ( -4,-4)++(2,-2 ) ; at ( -2,-6)@xmath558 ; at ( -3,-2.5)@xmath555 ; .25 in in 0, ... ,6 in 0 , ... , ( 2 * -,- ) coordinate ( v ) ; ( v ) circle ( 3 pt ) ; ( 0,0 ) ++(6,-6 ) ; ( 0,0)++(-6,-6 ) ; ( -1,-1)++(2,-2 ) ; ( -2,-2)++(1,-1);(-1,-3)+(1,-1 ) ; ( -3,-3)+(1,-1 ) ; ( -2,-4)+(1,-1 ) ; ( -4,-4)+(2,-2 ) ; ( 1,-1)+(-2,-2);(-1,-3)+(-2,-2 ) ; ( 2,-2)+(-1,-1);(1,-3)+(-1,-1);(0,-4)+(-1,-1);(-1,-5)+(-1,-1 ) ; at(-2,-6)@xmath558 ; at ( 3,-2.5)@xmath556 ; assuming a fixed ordering @xmath47 , the basic blocks @xmath559 , for @xmath560 , will be used frequently in the following and we will give them the special name @xmath561 . in a similar fashion , for @xmath562 define the block @xmath563 . in the following we will consider the set of diagrams for which @xmath564 in other words , the ordering on the edges coming into vertices @xmath205 and @xmath565 is left to right for all values of @xmath566 and @xmath567 . this means that @xmath568 and @xmath569 for @xmath570 . in the following we will show that for such orderings basic blocks have unique factorizations . [ lem : decomp ] given @xmath8 with @xmath560 and @xmath562 , there is a one - to - one correspondence between the set of possible basic blocks @xmath571 and the set of orderings of edges into each vertex @xmath572 with @xmath573 and @xmath574 : @xmath575 if and only if @xmath576 for all @xmath572 with @xmath573 and @xmath574 . the reverse direction is clear from the definition of @xmath577 . we will therefore consider a @xmath577 and show that it gives rise to a unique @xmath47 , given the appropriate restrictions . assume @xmath578 and we are given a basic block @xmath90 . starting from the left in @xmath90 , find the first occurrence of a block of the form , for some @xmath579 , @xmath580 , or @xmath581 if no @xmath580 is to be found . because of the restriction on @xmath47 , we know that it is either the case that @xmath582 and @xmath583 or @xmath584 and @xmath585 . in the first case , @xmath581 corresponds to the block @xmath586 , and in the second to @xmath587 . continue left to right in this fashion to decompose @xmath90 completely into a sequence of @xmath588 s and @xmath589 s . note that there is a unique path between @xmath205 and @xmath8 , and therefore @xmath561 appears only once in @xmath90 . furthermore , if @xmath590 then there is no path from @xmath591 to @xmath8 , and therefore @xmath588 can not be a subblock of @xmath592 . a similar argument gives the result for the @xmath593 . so @xmath561 and @xmath593 each appear exactly once , and if @xmath588 ( or @xmath589 ) appears in @xmath90 , then @xmath594 ( or @xmath595 ) . now , @xmath90 decomposes into the concatenation of @xmath596 and @xmath597 . note that the unique @xmath561 in @xmath90 is a subblock of the @xmath597 portion of @xmath577 . likewise , @xmath593 is a aubblock of the @xmath596 portion of @xmath90 . therefore , if @xmath561 appears before @xmath593 , then @xmath598 , and vice versa . this determines the order that @xmath47 gives to the edges with range @xmath8 . we also know the lengths of each of @xmath599 and @xmath600 . once we know which one comes first , we know exactly where the juxtaposition between the two occurs . we repeat this process on each word above @xmath592 to conclude that no ordering besides @xmath47 could have produced the block @xmath90 . we work through an example . consider the following block : @xmath601 because we know the structure of the @xmath588 and @xmath589 , we see that the first set of @xmath94 s and @xmath97 s is @xmath602 . this must be @xmath603 . then the next set of @xmath94 s and @xmath97 s is @xmath604 . this must be @xmath423 . we continue in this manner to see that the above block decomposes into @xmath605 . by the above lemma , this must be block @xmath606 . because the @xmath603 appears before the @xmath607 , @xmath606 must decompose into @xmath608 , which implies there was a right to left ordering on the edges with range @xmath609 . we need only to know that @xmath610 to see that @xmath611 and @xmath612 . we continue in this manner until we have placed an order on the incoming edges of all 6 unordered vertices that are above @xmath609 . see figure [ fig : decomposition ] . in 0, ... ,7 in 0 , ... , ( 2 * -,- ) coordinate ( v ) ; ( v ) circle ( 3 pt ) ; ( 0,0 ) ++(7,-7 ) ; ( 0,0)++(-7,-7 ) ; ( -1,-1)+(3,-3 ) ; ( -2,-2)+(1,-1);(-1,-3)+(2,-2 ) ; ( -3,-3)+(2,-2);(-1,-5)+(1,-1 ) ; ( -4,-4)+(2,-2);(-2,-6)+(1,-1 ) ; ( 1,-1)+(-4,-4 ) ; ( 2,-2)+(-1,-1);(1,-3)+(-1,-1);(0,-4)+(-2,-2 ) ; ( 3,-3)+(-1,-1);(2,-4)+(-3,-3 ) ; given left to right ordering on edges terminating at vertices @xmath613 and @xmath614 for all @xmath615 , then for all @xmath616 there are @xmath617 distinct blocks @xmath90 as we vary the orderings @xmath47 . [ prop : distinctb ] by the lemma , each ordering @xmath47 of the edges entering vertices @xmath572 above @xmath8 ( @xmath618 ) gives rise to a distinct @xmath90 . there are @xmath619 such vertices @xmath572 above @xmath8 and two choices of ordering for each vertex , yielding @xmath617 distinct orderings and hence that many blocks @xmath90 . for the big subshift , the complexity function @xmath620 is superpolynomial : for each @xmath621 there are at least @xmath622 blocks of length @xmath623 in the big subshift . let @xmath621 and @xmath624 . note that the binomial coefficient @xmath625 . then for any ordering @xmath47 , @xmath626 has length @xmath15 since the length of @xmath627 is the binomial coefficient @xmath628 . then the coarse lower bound above is given by just looking at the @xmath622 unique ways to form @xmath629 and applying proposition [ prop : distinctb ] . we will show next that the big subshift @xmath550 is not topologically transitive and that the small subshift " whose language is @xmath630 consists of only the two fixed points and the orbits of the points @xmath631 and @xmath632 . [ lem : ba^9 ] ( 1 ) there are orderings @xmath47 and @xmath633 of the pascal graph such that @xmath634 and @xmath635 . ( 2 ) for every ordering @xmath47 and every @xmath636 , the basic block @xmath554 does not contain both @xmath637 and @xmath638 . to prove ( 1 ) , we proceed to define the orderings @xmath47 and @xmath633 called for in the lemma . define @xmath639 , so that @xmath640 . further , choose @xmath47 and @xmath633 so that @xmath641 and @xmath642 . continuing , define @xmath47 and @xmath633 so that @xmath643 , @xmath644 , and @xmath645 , while @xmath646 , @xmath647 , and @xmath648 . then define @xmath649 ( so that the ordering by @xmath47 is `` left - right '' at these vertices ) and @xmath650 ( so that the ordering by @xmath633 is `` right - left '' at these vertices ) . we then have @xmath634 and @xmath635 . see figure [ fig : ab9ba9 ] . in 0, ... ,6 in 0 , ... , ( 2 * -,- ) coordinate ( v ) ; ( v ) circle ( 3 pt ) ; ( 0,0 ) ++(6,-6);(0,0)++(-6,-6 ) ; ( -1,-1)+(-1,-1);(-1,-1)+(1,-1 ) ; ( 1,-1)+(-1,-1);(1,-1)+(1,-1 ) ; ( -2,-2)+(-1,-1);(-2,-2)+(1,-1 ) ; ( 0,-2)[dashed]+(-1,-1);(0,-2)+(1,-1 ) ; ( 2,-2)[dashed]+(-1,-1);(2,-2)+(1,-1 ) ; ( -3,-3)+(1,-1 ) ; ( -1,-3)+(-1,-1);(-1,-3)+(1,-1 ) ; ( 1,-3)[dashed]+(-1,-1);(1,-3)[dashed]+(1,-1 ) ; ( 3,-3)+(-1,-1 ) ; ( -2,-4)+(1,-1 ) ; ( 0,-4)+(-1,-1);(0,-4)+(1,-1 ) ; ( 2,-4)+(-1,-1 ) ; ( -1,-5)[dashed]+(1,-1 ) ; ( 1,-5)+(-1,-1 ) ; at ( -3,-2.5)@xmath47 ; in 0, ... ,6 in 0 , ... , ( 2 * -,- ) coordinate ( v ) ; ( v ) circle ( 3 pt ) ; ( 0,0 ) ++(6,-6);(0,0)++(-6,-6 ) ; ( -1,-1)+(-1,-1);(-1,-1)+(1,-1 ) ; ( 1,-1)+(-1,-1);(1,-1)+(1,-1 ) ; ( -2,-2)+(-1,-1);(-2,-2)+(1,-1 ) ; ( 0,-2)[dashed]+(-1,-1);(0,-2)+(1,-1 ) ; ( 2,-2)[dashed]+(-1,-1);(2,-2)+(1,-1 ) ; ( -3,-3)+(1,-1 ) ; ( -1,-3)+(-1,-1);(-1,-3)+(1,-1 ) ; ( 1,-3)+(-1,-1);(1,-3)+(1,-1 ) ; ( 3,-3)[dashed]+(-1,-1 ) ; ( -2,-4)+(1,-1 ) ; ( 0,-4)+(-1,-1);(0,-4)+(1,-1 ) ; ( 2,-4)+(-1,-1 ) ; ( -1,-5)+(1,-1 ) ; ( 1,-5)[dashed]+(-1,-1 ) ; at ( 3,-2.5)@xmath633 ; to prove ( 2 ) , we want to focus on strings of alternating @xmath94 s and @xmath97 s that appear in the language of @xmath651 for some ordering @xmath47 of the pascal graph and hence in a basic block @xmath90 for some @xmath636 . so we provide a systematic way to ignore subblocks of the @xmath90 that can not be used , when @xmath90 is concatenated with @xmath652 or @xmath653 , to create a longer string @xmath654 than has been created previously . specifically , for each @xmath655 we let @xmath656 ( respectively @xmath657 ) be the longest string in which @xmath94 and @xmath97 alternate that is a prefix of @xmath90 ( respectively suffix of @xmath90 ) . for example , if @xmath658 , then @xmath659 and @xmath660 . we add the new symbol @xmath661 to our alphabet and define the `` condensed form '' of @xmath90 to be @xmath662 . ( if the block @xmath577 is made up entirely of alternating @xmath94 s and @xmath97 s there is no @xmath661 in @xmath663 . ) we want to show that if @xmath47 is an ordering such that @xmath664 , then @xmath665 ) , and vice versa ; that is , no @xmath90 can ever contain both @xmath637 and @xmath638 . we begin with two observations . the first is that for @xmath666 , @xmath667 can not have length greater than 3 . ( specifically , @xmath667 can be @xmath668 but can not be any longer . ) the same is true for @xmath669 , and similarly for @xmath670 and @xmath671 for @xmath672 . the second observation is that if a basic block @xmath415 has condensed form @xmath673 and a second basic block @xmath416 has condensed form @xmath674 , then the concatenation @xmath675 has condensed form @xmath676 . therefore , in order to determine the highest power of @xmath654 that can be formed by a concatenation of any two basic blocks one needs to look only far enough down to a level @xmath15 for which the condensed forms of all the basic blocks @xmath577 with @xmath677 and @xmath616 contain the symbol * . we can then determine the highest power of @xmath654 in @xmath678 by considering all possible concatenations @xmath679 with @xmath680 and @xmath681 . without loss of generality we assume that @xmath682 . then depending on the choice among the four partial orders on the edges with range in @xmath683 there are the following possibilities for the basic blocks at level @xmath684 : @xmath685 , @xmath686 or @xmath668 , @xmath687 or @xmath688 and @xmath689 . it is straightforward to check that for three of the four possible orderings all the condensed blocks @xmath663 with @xmath690 and @xmath616 necessarily contain the symbol @xmath661 . since every basic block at level 4 has length no more than 6 , for these three orderings it is impossible that @xmath637 or @xmath638 is contained within any of these blocks or , since they all contain a @xmath661 , any of their concatenations . hence the only way that @xmath637 or @xmath638 could be formed is in the case of the fourth ordering at level 3 , when @xmath691 and @xmath692 . in this case the possibilities are @xmath693 or @xmath694 , @xmath695 or @xmath696 , and @xmath697 or @xmath698 . for each of the 8 possible orderings at the vertices @xmath8 with @xmath699 and @xmath616 the condensed blocks @xmath663 all necessarily contain a @xmath661 . therefore 5 is the last level at which we need to look in order to determine which orderings give rise to either @xmath637 or @xmath638 . the only two blocks on level 5 that could concatenate to give a word of length @xmath700 are @xmath701 and @xmath702 , both of length 10 . further , since each of @xmath703 and @xmath704 contains a @xmath661 , the maximum length of @xmath705 is 9 . in order to form either @xmath637 or @xmath638 , we would need both @xmath706 and @xmath707 to be of length 9 , or both @xmath708 and @xmath709 to be of length 9 . in the situation to which we have reduced , there is exactly one ordering down to level 5 for which both @xmath706 and @xmath707 have length 9 ; for this ordering @xmath710 and @xmath711 . in this case it is possible to concatenate @xmath701 and @xmath702 to form the word @xmath638 . however , because these two blocks contain the longest possible strings of alternating @xmath94 s and @xmath97 s down to level 5 , there is no way , given this ordering , ever to create the word @xmath637 . similarly , there is exactly one case for which @xmath708 and @xmath709 are of length 9 , namely when @xmath712 and @xmath713 . the string @xmath637 can be made with the ordering corresponding to this case , but @xmath638 can not . therefore , any ordering which gives rise to the block @xmath637 can not also give rise to @xmath638 , and vice versa . there is no dense orbit in @xmath550 . by the lemma , both of the blocks @xmath637 and @xmath638 are in @xmath714 . but no sequence in @xmath550 can contain both of these blocks , since any block containing both of them would have to be a subblock of @xmath90 for some @xmath715 , and @xmath99 . [ prop : periodicpoints ] the only periodic points in the big subshift @xmath548 are the two fixed points @xmath716 and @xmath717 . suppose that @xmath148 is a periodic sequence . if @xmath148 is not one of the two fixed points , then the runs of @xmath94 and @xmath97 in @xmath148 are of bounded length : there is @xmath718 such that if @xmath719 or @xmath720 appear in @xmath148 , then @xmath721 . for each ordering @xmath47 the two basic blocks @xmath722 and @xmath723 each contain strings of length @xmath1 of @xmath94 or @xmath97 , respectively . if @xmath724 , then every basic block @xmath90 with @xmath677 and @xmath655 , which is a concatenation of basic blocks at level @xmath725 , contains one of the basic blocks @xmath723 or @xmath722 from level @xmath725 . denote by @xmath726 the maximum of the lengths of basic blocks at level @xmath727 . every block in the language @xmath728 of length greater than @xmath729 must contain either a basic block of length greater than @xmath279 from level @xmath727 , and hence @xmath719 or @xmath720 for some @xmath730 , or one of the strings @xmath731 or @xmath732 . the later can not occur since @xmath733 . thus no block in @xmath148 of length greater than @xmath729 can be in @xmath728 , and @xmath148 can not be in @xmath550 unless it is one of the two fixed points . [ lem : fixedpts ] the small subshift @xmath734 contains the points @xmath735 , and @xmath736 . if @xmath737 is not eventually constant , then for every @xmath738 there is an @xmath98 such that @xmath739 and @xmath740 . then @xmath741 and @xmath716 are in @xmath651 . suppose then that @xmath737 is eventually constant , say @xmath742 for all @xmath743 . then @xmath744 for some @xmath745 and all @xmath743 . the block @xmath746 is a concatenation of the blocks @xmath747 , @xmath748 , @xmath749 and @xmath750 in some order , each with multiplicity one . by the the pigeonhole principle it is necessary that either @xmath748 is concatenated with @xmath749 , or @xmath748 is concatenated with @xmath750 , or @xmath749 is concatenated with @xmath750 . it follows that for @xmath751 the block @xmath752 necessarily appears in @xmath746 . letting @xmath98 tend to infinity shows that @xmath741 and @xmath716 are in @xmath651 . that @xmath753 follows by symmetry . [ thm : smallsubshift ] the small subshift @xmath734 consists of only the two fixed points and the orbits of the points @xmath754 and @xmath632 . we fix the orderings @xmath47 and @xmath633 used in lemma [ lem : ba^9 ] : @xmath755 for notational ease , let @xmath756 be denoted by @xmath757 , let @xmath758 be denoted by @xmath759 , and let @xmath760 . likewise , let @xmath761 be denoted by @xmath762 , let @xmath763 be denoted by @xmath764 , and let @xmath765 . for all @xmath766 , @xmath767 and @xmath768 note that if @xmath769 , @xmath577 and @xmath770 have at most one @xmath97 ; and if @xmath771 , then each of these blocks has at most one @xmath94 . we first determine ways that for @xmath772 , @xmath773 may occur in @xmath577 , for any @xmath8 . because of the preceding observation , it suffices to consider only @xmath774 . if @xmath775 , @xmath577 can be decomposed into a concatenation of @xmath757 , @xmath759 , and @xmath776 with @xmath777 as follows . since @xmath101 for all @xmath778 , @xmath779 . continue factoring in this manner , reducing @xmath98 and @xmath99 , until each block in the factorization is one of @xmath780 , or @xmath781 , for some @xmath777 . the concatenation that we arrive at must have the following structure . @xmath782 can be followed only by @xmath776 . for @xmath783 , @xmath757 can be followed only by @xmath784 . @xmath785 can be preceded only by @xmath776 . for @xmath786 , @xmath759 can be preceded only by @xmath787 . note that for all @xmath788 the concatenation @xmath789 does occur in some @xmath90 , for example in @xmath790 . none of the blocks @xmath791 end with @xmath792 ; for all @xmath793 , @xmath794 , @xmath759 and @xmath776 do not contain @xmath795 . so if @xmath772 and @xmath773 appears in @xmath90 , then the majority of the @xmath795 portion of @xmath773 must appear within one of the factors @xmath757 of @xmath90 for some @xmath796 . we can then see that @xmath773 appears in one of only four possible ways : 1 . across a concatenation @xmath797 for some @xmath794 , 2 . across a concatenation @xmath798 , 3 . across a concatenation @xmath799 , 4 . entirely within a block @xmath757 for some @xmath800 . in the first two cases , the appearance of @xmath773 is within the block @xmath801 , while in the second two cases the appearance of @xmath773 is within the block @xmath802 . therefore , @xmath773 appears in any sequence in @xmath803 only as a subblock of one of the two longer blocks @xmath801 or @xmath802 . we next determine ways that for @xmath772 , @xmath773 may occur in @xmath770 , for any @xmath8 . again , it suffices to consider only @xmath774 . if @xmath775 , @xmath770 can be decomposed into a concatenation of @xmath762 , @xmath764 and @xmath804 with @xmath805 as follows . since @xmath806 for all @xmath778 , @xmath807 . continue factoring in this manner , reducing @xmath98 and @xmath99 , until each block in the factorization is one of @xmath808 , or @xmath809 , for some @xmath777 . the concatenation that we arrive at must have the following structure . @xmath810 can be preceded only by @xmath804 . for @xmath783 , @xmath762 can be preceded only by @xmath811 . @xmath812 can be followed only by @xmath804 . for @xmath786 , @xmath764 can be followed only by @xmath787 . note that for all @xmath788 the concatenation @xmath813 does occur in some @xmath770 , for example , in @xmath814 . none of the blocks @xmath804 , @xmath762 , @xmath764 begin with @xmath792 ; for all @xmath793 , @xmath794 , @xmath764 and @xmath804 do not contain @xmath795 . so if @xmath772 and @xmath773 appears in @xmath770 , then the majority of the @xmath795 portion of @xmath773 must appear within one of the factors @xmath762 of @xmath770 for some @xmath815 . we can then see that @xmath773 appears in one of only four possible ways : 1 . across a concatenation @xmath816 for some @xmath817 , 2 . across a concatenation @xmath818 , 3 . across a concatenation @xmath819 , 4 . entirely within a block @xmath762 for some @xmath800 . in the first case , the appearance of @xmath773 is within the block @xmath820 for some @xmath817 , while in the second case we see that the appearance of @xmath773 is within the block @xmath821 . in the third case the appearance of @xmath773 is within the block @xmath822 . in the final case if @xmath823 the appearance of @xmath773 is within the block @xmath824 . however , if @xmath825 , @xmath826 is not long enough to gather enough information about how @xmath773 is extended to the right and we must examine which blocks can follow @xmath826 . these are @xmath827 , and @xmath828 . these give rise to the longer words @xmath820 for some @xmath817 , @xmath829 , and @xmath830 , respectively . therefore , @xmath773 appears in any sequence in @xmath831 only as a subblock of one of these four longer words . most significantly , we see that any extension of @xmath773 in @xmath832 will not be in @xmath833 . we use a similar argument to determine ways that , for @xmath772 , @xmath834 may occur in any @xmath577 with @xmath774 . we find that @xmath834 appears in any sequence in @xmath803 only at the end of the longer block @xmath835 or as a subblock of @xmath836 . similarly , for @xmath772 , @xmath834 may occur in @xmath770 for @xmath774 only as a subblock of one of the four longer blocks @xmath837 for some @xmath815 , @xmath838 , @xmath839 , or @xmath840 . most significantly , we see that any extension of @xmath834 in @xmath832 will not be in @xmath833 . let @xmath841 and suppose that @xmath148 is not in the orbit of any of the sequences @xmath842 we will show that then a block @xmath773 or @xmath834 with @xmath772 appears in @xmath148 , contradicting what was just established above . since @xmath843 is not in one of the four special orbits listed above , there are at least three distinct values of @xmath138 for which @xmath844 , say for @xmath845 ; in other words , @xmath148 contains at least 3 switches " from @xmath94 to @xmath97 or vice versa . let @xmath846 be such a block which contains exactly three switches , so that @xmath543 has the form @xmath847 or @xmath848 for some @xmath849 . let @xmath530 = @xmath850 ; in other words , @xmath530 extends in @xmath148 to the left and the right of the three places @xmath851 , where switches are known to occur , by 100 entries . in addition , let @xmath852 be the subblock of @xmath148 that extends @xmath530 by 20 letters to the left and 20 letters to the right . since @xmath853 , there is a block @xmath577 that contains @xmath852 ( with @xmath854 , since otherwise @xmath90 contains only two switches ) . moreover , the block @xmath776 does not appear in @xmath148 , so @xmath852 does not contain the entirety of @xmath776 as a subblock . therefore , when @xmath90 is written according to the above scheme as a concatenation of @xmath855 for certain choices of @xmath856 , the portion of @xmath577 containing @xmath530 does not overlap any part of an appearance of @xmath776 in the factorization ( meaning that the intervals of indices of @xmath90 at which any copies of @xmath530 and @xmath776 appear are disjoint ) . in other words , @xmath530 is contained in its entirety within concatenations of the blocks @xmath757 and @xmath759 according to the structure given above . consider the factorization of @xmath90 as described above , with @xmath777 . the block @xmath846 must overlap some blocks @xmath757 and @xmath759 of the factorization , and this can happen only with @xmath857 . this is because @xmath858 can appear in any sequence in @xmath651 only as part of the string @xmath859 ; but we know that @xmath530 does not overlap any portion of @xmath776 , and the length of @xmath860 is 100 . similarly , @xmath543 can not overlap @xmath861 or @xmath782 . and if @xmath543 overlaps a block @xmath759 of the factorization , it must happen with @xmath862 , since @xmath863 can occur in any sequence in @xmath651 only at the end of a string @xmath864 , which also has length 100 ; and similarly for @xmath865 and @xmath785 . as mentioned above , @xmath543 is either of the form @xmath847 or @xmath848 . if either @xmath114 or @xmath15 is greater than 6 , then @xmath773 or @xmath834 , with @xmath772 , appears in @xmath543 , a subblock of @xmath530 , a subblock of @xmath148 . suppose that both @xmath866 and @xmath543 overlaps @xmath757 for some @xmath867 or @xmath543 overlaps @xmath759 for some @xmath868 . then inspection of the blocks @xmath757 and @xmath759 with @xmath869 shows that @xmath543 must necessarily overlap the suffix of @xmath757 of length 45 , or the prefix of length 45 of @xmath759 , or both , for some @xmath869 . however , if @xmath543 overlaps the last 45 entries of an appearance of a block @xmath757 with @xmath867 , then the block @xmath870 appears in the block @xmath871 . similarly , if @xmath543 overlaps the first 45 entries of an appearance of a block @xmath759 with @xmath862 , then the block @xmath872 appears in the block @xmath873 . thus at least one of the blocks @xmath870 or @xmath872 appears in @xmath148 . we conclude that it is impossible that any @xmath841 is not in the orbit of one of the sequences @xmath874 . is coding orbits by the _ first _ edge also essentially faithful for every ordering of the pascal diagram ? in other words , under the hypotheses of theorem [ thm : coding ] , is the coding of @xmath37 by initial segments of length @xmath279 not the same as the coding of @xmath167 by initial segments of length @xmath279 ? [ ex : uncountablymanymax ] it is possible to assign an ordering to the pascal graph in such a way that there are uncountably many minimal paths . it suffices to find a binary tree embedded in the graph , for then we can define the ordering in such a way that all edges in the tree are minimal , the other edges to vertices in the tree are maximal , and the orderings at remaining vertices are assigned arbitrarily . let the tree include the vertex @xmath20 at level 0 and nonintersecting paths to vertices @xmath875 and @xmath876 at level 3 . continue inductively as follows . suppose that @xmath877 and the tree from level 0 to level @xmath878 contains every other vertex at level @xmath878 and no other vertices at that level or at higher levels . ( if these vertices are labeled @xmath879 , we are including @xmath880 . ) extend the tree to contain @xmath881 nonintersecting paths from these vertices to every fourth vertex at level @xmath882 . then from each of these vertices at level @xmath882 extend two paths to form nonintersecting paths to every other vertex at level @xmath883 . we can simultaneously embed another dyadic tree which shares no edges with the first tree if necessary , spread out the construction of the first tree even more . then declaring that all edges in the second tree are maximal will produce an ordering for which there are uncountably many maximal paths as well as uncountably many minimal paths . we do not know whether it is possible for an ordering to have countably many maximal paths and uncountably many minimal paths , or vice versa . ( but no ordering on the pascal graph can have only finitely many maximal or minimal paths , since from each vertex there is a unique path up to the root consisting entirely of maximal ( or entirely of minimal ) edges . ) we are interested in asymptotic estimates of the complexity function @xmath884 which counts the number of @xmath15-blocks seen in the 1-codings of all sequences in the adic system @xmath885 on the pascal graph with a fixed ordering @xmath47 . it is known @xcite that for the ordinary pascal system , determined by @xmath46 , @xmath886 . can some orderings produce asymptotically larger or smaller complexity functions ? if orderings are chosen at random , for example by independent choices at each vertex of @xmath89 with some probability @xmath887 and @xmath279 with probability @xmath888 , what is the expected asymptotic complexity of the set of resulting codings ? Abstract:

Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.

Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered . Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video . Paper: this paper concerns the classical ground state of the hamiltonian @xmath1 where @xmath2 are unit vectors , and the couplings @xmath3 have the symmetry of the lattice and may extend several neighbors away ( being frustrated in the interesting cases ) . after an antiferromagnet s ordering pattern ( or partial information ) is determined by neutron diffraction , the next question is which spin hamiltonian(s ) imply that order , if we admit interactions @xmath4 to second neighbors or @xmath5 to further neighbors . the starting point for understanding ordered states is always the classical ground state(s ) . if the spins sit on a _ bravais _ lattice ( e.g. face - centered cubic ) , the solution is trivial due to a rigorous recipe , called the luttinger - tisza " ( lt ) method ( see sec . [ sec : lt ] below ) : the spins adopt ( at most ) a simple spiral a _ coplanar _ state , meaning all spins point in the same plane of spin space @xcite . but if the spins form a lattice with a basis ( more than one site per primitive cell ) , e.g. kagom , diamond , pyrochlore , or half - garnet lattices no mechanical recipe is known to discover the ground state . in these more complicated lattices , magnetic frustration ( competing interactions ) often induces complicated spin arrangements . our aim has been to find a recipe for general lattices ( albeit neither exhaustive nor rigorous ) to discover the ground state spin pattern corresponding to a given set of exchange couplings @xmath6 , to neighbors at successive distances . that is obviously a prerequisite for solving the inverse problem ( given the ordering patterns found by neutron diffraction , which combination(s ) of interactions can explain them ? ) . furthermore , after the whole phase diagram is mapped out , we can identify the parameter sets leading to exceptionally degenerate or otherwise interesting states , so as to recognize which real or model systems might be close to realizing those special states . in this work , we focus on a narrower question : which parameter combinations give a _ noncoplanar _ ground state , which could never happen in a bravais lattice ? we adopt the exchange hamiltonian ( [ eq : ham ] ) , excluding single - site anisotropies and dzyaloshinskii - moriya couplings , which can trivially give non - coplanar ground states . we do not count cases where a non - coplanar ground state belongs to a degenerate family of states that also includes coplanar ground states . this happens trivially when two sublattices are nt coupled at all , or nontrivially when the interactions are constrained to cancel . in the latter cases thermal or quantum fluctuations usually break the degeneracy , favoring the collinear or coplanar states @xcite . ( a small amount of site - dilution or bond disorder can generate a uniform effective hamiltonian that favors non - coplanar states @xcite , but here we only consider undisordered systems . ) there are specific physical motivations to hunt for non - coplanar states . first , they point to possible realizations of _ chiral _ @xcite spin liquids , such as are described within bosonic large-@xmath7 formalisms ( as are hoped to approximate the behavior of frustrated magnets with @xmath8 ) . such formalisms describe transitions from an ordered state to a quantum - disordered spin liquid ; since there is no generic reason for a state to stop being chiral at the same time it loses spin order , a chiral ordered state presumably transitions into a chiral spin liquid . hence , as a rule of thumb , a chiral spin liquid is feasible if and only if the classical ordered state ( on the same lattice ) is non - coplanar . @xcite . secondly , spin non - coplanarity in metals ( usually induced by an external magnetic field ) allows the _ anomalous hall effect _ observed in pyrochlore and other magnets . @xcite this is ascribed to spin - orbit coupling and the berry phases of hopping electrons ( which are zero in the collinear or coplanar case ) . thirdly , the symmetry - breaking of noncoplanar exchange - coupled magnetic states is labeled by an order parameter which is an @xmath9 matrix , so the order - parameter manifold is disconnected . this permits a novel topological defect : the @xmath10 domain wall @xcite , which is only possible in non - coplanar phases . finally , there is current interest in `` multiferroic '' materials ( i.e. those with cross couplings of electric and magnetic polarizations ) . for example , in the canonical multiferroics rmno@xmath11 ( where r = rare earth ) , frustrated exchange interactions induce a coplanar spiral , which in the presence of dzyaloshinskii - moriya anisotropic interactions carries an electric polarization with it @xcite . if these spirals were asymmetric conic spirals , like our second class of ground states , there is generically a net moment along the axis , which serves as a convenient `` handle '' to externally manipulate the orientation of the ground state ( and thus control the multiferroic properties ) . our spins sit on a rarely studied lattice we christen the `` octahedral lattice '' , consisting of the medial lattice ( bond midpoints ) of a simple cubic lattice . thus forming corner - sharing octahedra . thus , each unit cell has a basis of three sites , forming what we call the @xmath12 , @xmath13 , and @xmath14 sublattices ( according to the direction of the bond they sit on ) . each cubic vertex is surrounded by an octahedron of six sites , with nearest - neighbor bonds forming its edges ; these octahedra share corners , much as triangles or tetrahedra share corners in the well - known kagom and pyrochlore lattices . ( indeed , although the `` checkerboard '' lattice was introduced as a two - dimensional version of the pyrochlore lattice @xcite , the octahedral lattice is the best three - dimensional generalization of the checkerboard lattice . ) this lattice was first studied as a frustrated ising antiferromagnet @xcite more recently , it was used as a ( simpler / pedagogical ) toy model in papers aimed at the `` coulomb phase '' of highly constrained spins on a pyrochlore lattice @xcite . it is one of the lattices constructed from the root lattices of lie algebras . @xcite the octahedral sites are wyckoff positions ( and hence candidates for a magnetic lattice ) in most cubic space groups , so this is plausible to find in real materials , and a few are known . most simply , it is realized by the transition metal sites in the cu@xmath11au superstructure of the fcc lattice @xcite ( i.e. all but one of the four simple cubic sublattices ) . so far , the only example known in which the `` cu '' lattice is magnetic seems to be mn@xmath11ge which is ferromagnetic @xcite another realization is in metallic perovskites such as mn@xmath11snn , though again the known materials are ferromagnetic @xcite . it would actually seem quite plausible to find realizations of our models , which mostly have several exchange interactions @xmath6 with competing signs , among metallic alloys : the rkky interaction , expected between local moments in any metal , oscillates with distance inside a slowly decaying envelope . the octahedral lattice is closely related to the magnetic lattice found in the ( mostly metallic ) ir@xmath11ge@xmath15 structures , including the strong - electron - interaction superconductor mo@xmath11sb@xmath15 @xcite . in that lattice , the simple - cubic lattice sites are surrounded by _ octahedra , i.e. a dimer of _ two _ magnetic ions decorates each bond of the simple cubic lattice . if this dimer were strongly coupled ferromagnetically , it would be a good approximation to treat it as a single spin , which is exactly the octahedral lattice . instead , in mo@xmath11sb@xmath15 the dimers are antiferromagnetically coupled and , since mo has spin 1/2 , they form singlets @xcite . if the spin length were longer , justifying classical treatment , we could convert to the ferromagnetic case simply by inverting the spin directions in every octahedron around an odd site of the cubic lattice , and changing the sign of all bonds coupling even sites with odd sites . thus , much of the classical phase diagram for the mo@xmath11sb@xmath15 lattice is related to that of the octahedral lattice . in this paper , we mainly consider four kinds of couplings , for separations out to the third neighbors : @xmath16 for @xmath17 , @xmath4 or @xmath18 for @xmath19 , @xmath20 for @xmath21 . notice that couplings with the same displacement need not be equivalent by symmetry , since the site symmetry is just fourfold , less than cubic . ( our naming convention is to use the prime for the separation which requires more first - neighbor steps to traverse . ) we also ( less extensively ) consider interactions @xmath22 or @xmath23 for @xmath24 . to organize our exploration of this parameter space , in analytic calculations we shall often assume @xmath25 ( that suffices to give examples of most of the classes we found of noncoplanar ground states ) . we begin ( sec . [ sec : framework ] ) by developing the techniques and concepts necessary to find the phase diagram as a function of the @xmath0 s and to discover _ non - coplanar _ ground states . we found ground states using three methods the first ( sec . [ sec : lt ] was fourier analysis , known as the `` luttinger - tisza '' method , which can give a lower bound on the energy , but may not give a full picture of the ground state . the second ( sec . [ sec : iter - min ] is an iterative minimization algorithm , which numerically converges to a ground state ; we introduce several diagnostic tools for understanding the spin patterns produced by iterative minimization . the third method ( sec . [ sec : var ] ) is the variational optimization of idealized patterns displayed by iterative minimization . we then turn to our results , beginning with descriptions of the several classes of magnetic state we found for the octahedral lattice : various coplanar states ( sec . [ sec : coplane ] ) , the noncoplanar , commensurate `` cuboctabedral '' spin states ( sec . [ sec : cuboc ] ) , and a more generic group of noncoplanar , incommensurate `` conic spirals '' ( sec . [ sec : conic ] ) ; in these the lattice breaks up into layers of spins with the same directions , each layer being rotated around the same ( spin - space ) axis relative to the layer below . particularly noteworthy was a `` double - twist '' state we encountered , which is something like a conic spiral which also has a complex modulation in the transverse directions ( sec . [ sec : doubletwist ] ) . the plain stacked structures can be studied by mapping to one - dimensional ( `` chain '' ) lattices , also with couplings to many neighbors , as worked through in sec . [ sec : mapping ] . from this we go on ( sec . [ sec : phase ] ) to quickly survey the phase diagrams we found , first for the cuboctahedral lattice , and then for the chain lattice ( when treated as a lattice in its own right ) . in the conclusion , sec . [ sec : discussion ] , we reflect on what our results might suggest for other frustrated lattices , such as the pyrochlore . we employed several approaches to discover and understand ground states , for each given set of interactions ( these are developed rest of this section except for the use of mappings , which we explain in sec . [ sec : conic ] , where it becomes natural to employ this technique ) . * . a fourier analysis of the hamiltonian ( [ eq : ham ] ) as a quadratic form with coefficients @xmath0 , the so - called `` luttinger - tisza '' method outlined in sec . [ sec : lt ] . * . iterative minimization , our main `` exploratory '' technique . starting from a random initial condition , we successively adjusted randomly chosen spins so as to reduce the energy . [ sec : iter - min ] ) . we then analyzed each resulting pattern with various diagnostics , as described in sec . [ sec : iter - min ] , and tagged the non - coplanar ones for further investigation . * . variational optimization of the iterative minimization ground state . finding a closed - form for the ground state introduces a number of free parameters ( the most obvious being a wave - vector ) . by allowing these parameters to vary from the values found with iterative minimization , we find a new , more rigorous , ground state . * . mapping the ( three - dimensional ) problem to a similar problem in a one - dimensional `` chain '' lattice with a basis of two sites . this is valid when the optimal ( three dimensional ) spin configuration is a stacking of layers , which we judged based on the results from approaches ( a ) and ( b ) . the states on this simplified chain lattice may be found using approaches ( a ) and ( b ) , or analytically solved after parametrizing the state with a set of variational parameters . the general theory of spin arrangements is reviewed in refs . and . the most fruitful approach to finding the ground states of the hamiltonian ( [ eq : ham ] ) is to treat it as a quadratic form rewriting ( [ eq : ham ] ) as @xmath26 where @xmath27 and @xmath28 are sublattice indices ; the explicit formulas for the cuboctahedral lattice case are given in appendix [ sec : pert - lt ] , eq . ( [ eq : lt - matrix ] ) . then we diagonalize this matrix , obtaining @xmath29 here @xmath30 is the number of sites per primitive cell , and @xmath31 is a band index ; thus @xmath32 are the eigenvalues of @xmath0 as an @xmath33 matrix , with @xmath7 being the number of cells ( to be taken to infinity ) , and the wavevector @xmath34 runs over the brillouin zone . [ in the bravais lattice case , @xmath35 , the eigenvalue @xmath36 is simply the fourier transform of @xmath37 ; for @xmath38 . ] also , @xmath39 ( complex - valued 3-vector ) is the projection of the spin configuration onto the corresponding normalized eigenmode , @xmath40 . we shall call these the `` luttinger - tisza '' ( lt ) eigenvalues and modes @xcite ; a mode with the most negative @xmath41 is called an `` optimal '' mode , and its wavevector is called @xmath42 . the ideal case is that we can build a spin state satisfying two conditions * _ condition ( 1 ) _ @xmath43 are entirely linear combinations of optimal lt modes * _ condition ( 2 ) _ @xmath44 everywhere ( unit length constraint ) if both conditions are satisfied , these _ must _ be ground states , and all ground states _ must _ be of this form . in the case of a bravais lattice ( @xmath35 ) , the lt modes are just plane waves @xmath45 , and one can always construct a _ planar _ spiral configuration @xcite , @xmath46 , where @xmath47 and @xmath48 are orthogonal unit vectors , and the spatial dependence consists only of optimal modes @xcite . in the simplest cases , @xmath49 is at high symmetry points on brillouin zone corners , and one can construct a combination of optimal modes which is @xmath50 on all sites , which defines a _ collinear _ ground state , as in the phase diagrams in ref . . thus , non - bravais lattices are _ necessary _ in order to get non - coplanar states . ( but not sufficient : it appears that , on non - bravais lattices with high symmetry , the commonest ground states are still collinear or coplanar . ) in lattices - with - a - basis , however , the lt eigenmodes have different amplitudes on different sites within the unit cell , and it is not generally possible to make any three - component linear combination of the best modes that satisfies the unit - length constraint . ( there is an exception for lattices in which the neighbors - of - neighbors are all second neighbors , such as the diamond @xcite or honeycomb @xcite lattices . a `` generalized '' l - t method for non - bravais lattices was introduced by ref . ( see also ref . ) and applied to spinels with both a and b sites magnetic @xcite . however , this method involves site - dependent variational parameters , so one must already understand the pattern of the ground state in order to make it into a finite problem ; in practice , this method appears quite similar to our method ( sec . [ sec : conic ] and [ sec : pert - state ] ) of projecting a layered structure to a one - dimensional chain . although the lt optimal modes ( usually ) give the _ exact _ ground states in the cases we focus on , we believe the exact ground state is frequently built mainly from almost - optimal modes ; that is , although a linear combination of optimum lt modes violates the unit - spin constraint , with a small distortion it may satisfy the constraint and be the ground state . ( that distortion necessitates admixing other modes but with small amplitudes , since they carry a large energy penalty , according to ( [ eq : modes - fourier ] ) . ) in particular , we anticipate that ( for incommensurate orderings ) the true ordering wavevector lies in the same symmetry direction as the lt wavevector ; and that the phase diagram for optimum lt wavevectors mostly has the same topology as the actual phase diagram for ground states . thus the lt modes can serve as a `` map '' for navigating the parameter space of @xmath51 and for understanding the ground state spin configurations . an important caveat is that almost all @xmath52 vectors have symmetry - related degeneracies , and the lt analysis is silent on how these modes are to be combined with different spin directions , so the specification of the actual spin configuration is incomplete . ( an example is the `` double - twist '' state , of sec . [ sec : doubletwist ] . ) as a corollary , a single phase domain on the lt mode phase diagram might be subdivided into several phases in the spin - configuration phase diagram , that represent different ways of taking linear combinations of the same lt modes . this can not be detected at the lt level . one immediate insight is afforded by considering the lt phase diagram . short - range couplings have fourier transforms @xmath53 in ( [ eq : ham - fourier ] ) that vary slowly in reciprocal space . such functions typically possess extrema at high - symmetry points in the brillouin zone ; the same is probably true for the optimum _ eigenvalues _ and their wavevectors @xmath49 . that corresponds to simple , commensurate ordering in real space . in order to get the optimal lt mode ( and presumably the actual ordering ) to be incommensurate , or to possibly stabilize states with stacking directions other than ( 100 ) , one needs to include more distant neighbor couplings . in practice , we never used lt to directly discover the ground state spin configuration ; its value is to quickly prove a given state is a ground state . but the lt viewpoint did inform the fourier - transform diagnostic we used in analyzing the outputs of iterative relaxation ( sec . [ sec : iter - min ] . furthermore , when we operated in the `` designer '' mode ( seeking the couplings that stabilize a specified state ) we used the lt modes as a guide or clue : namely , we found the @xmath51 that made the ordering wavevector @xmath52 of our target state to be the optimal @xmath49 , which is easier than making @xmath52 be the ordering wavevector of the actual ground state . our prime tool for exploration was iterative minimization starting from a random initial condition . random spins are selected in turn and adjusted ( one at a time ) so as to minimize the energy , by aligning with the local field of their neighbors , till the configuration converged on a local minimum of the hamiltonian . ( our criterion was that the energy change in one sweep over the lattice was less than a chosen tolerance , typically @xmath54 ) . it might be worried that such an algorithm gets stuck in metastable states , unrepresentative of the ground state ; such `` glassy '' behavior is indeed expected in the case of ising ( or otherwise discrete ) spins , or in _ randomly _ frustrated systems such as spin glasses . however , vector spins typically have sufficient freedom to get close to the true ground state @xcite . the typical ways they deviated from the ground state are just long - wavelength wandering ( `` spin waves '' ) or twists of the spin directions . the only problem with the dynamics is that our algorithm is a variant of `` steepest descent '' , one of the slowest of relaxation algorithms . such deviation modes are indeed slow relaxing for this kind of ( local ) dynamics , the relaxation rate of a long - wavelength spin wave at wavevector @xmath55 is proportional to @xmath56 , i.e. @xmath57 for the slowest mode in a system of side @xmath58 . ( in future applications , some version of conjugate gradient should be applied to give a faster convergence , or if there is a problem is finding the right valley of the energy function one might adapt elser s `` difference map '' approach to global optimization @xcite . ) for initial explorations , we usually used very small cubic simulation boxes of @xmath59 cells ( @xmath60 , 4 , or 5 ) . for each set of @xmath61 tested , we tried both periodic and antiperiodic boundary conditions , as well as even or odd @xmath58 . usually one of those four cases accomodates an approximation of the infinite system ground state , though of course any incommensurate state must adjust either by twisting to shift the ordering wavevector to the nearest allowed value , or else ( as we observed ) via the formation of wall defects . we tried to distinguish the ground states which were `` genuine '' in that a similar state would remain stable in the thermodynamic limit . in particular , out of the four standard systems we tried ( even / odd system size , periodic / antiperiodic bc s ) , a `` genuine '' state should be the one with lowest energy . for a large portion of the parameter space , the ground states were planar spirals , essentially no different from the solutions guaranteed in the bravais lattice case . many of the noncoplanar configurations found were `` non - genuine '' artifacts of finite size when the periodic ( or antiperiodic ) boundary conditions and dimension @xmath58 were incompatible with the natural periodicity of the true ground state . one might expect the wrong boundary condition to simply impose a twist by @xmath62 per layer on the true ground state , but instead the observed distortion of the spin texture was sometimes of the natural periodicity of the ground state , a `` buckling '' occurred ; that is , the configuration consists of finite domains similar to the true ground state , separated by soliton - like domain walls . the greatest difficulty in our procedure was not obtaining an approximation of the ground state , or even deciding whether it was genuine . rather , it was grasping what the obtained pattern is , and how to idealize it to a periodic ( or quasiperiodic ) true ground state of the infinite system . we were aided by the following three diagnostics . configurations obtained by iterative minimization were fourier transformed and the norms of each fourier component @xmath63 were summed ( combining the sublattices ) @xcite . this suffices to identify the state when it is a relatively simple antiferromagnetic pattern , or an incommensurate state described as a layer stacking . in any case , the results can be compared to the lt mode calculation to see if the found state achieves the lt bound . the simplest visual diagnostic of a state is the `` common - origin plot '' , in which each spin s orientation is represented as a point on the unit sphere . for example , an incommensurate coplanar spiral state would appear as a single great circle on the common - origin plot ( see fig . [ fig : cop ] ) . a drawback of the common - origin plot is the lack of information on the spatial relation of the spins . ( for example , a `` cone '' might appear consisting of closely spaced spin directions , but these might belong to widely spaced sites . ) furthermore , this diagnostic is quite fragile in configurations where a domain wall or other defect has been quenched in . in the case of one - dimensional chains ( see sec . [ sec : mapping ] ) , we may instead use the `` end - to - end '' spin plot , where the tail of each spin vector is on the head of the previous spin vector . the advantage is that ( i ) images are not so obscured by overlaying of different vectors , and ( ii ) spatial information is captured , in particular defects where the state has `` buckled '' . @xcite in tandem with the common - origin plot , an algorithm was used that found groups of spins with ( nearly ) identical spin directions , within a chosen tolerance ( typically , a dot product greater than 0.99 ) . for commensurate patterns comprising a finite set of spin directions , this allowed the magnetic unit cell and spin configuration to be read off , but it was useless for incommensurate states , in which no spin direction exactly repeats . . planar spiral ( b ) . cuboctahedral state ( c ) . asymmetric conic spiral ( d ) . alternating conic spiral . ] we computed the @xmath64 tensor @xmath65 ( notice @xmath66 ) and diagonalized it . we recognize coplanar or non - coplanar spin states as those where @xmath67 has two or three nonzero eigenvalues , respectively . ( rotating the spin configuration so the principal directions of @xmath67 are the coordinate axes usually manifests the spin configuration s symmetries . ) through the diagnostic techniques described in the previous subsections , it is normally straightforward to parameterize the spins in the ground as @xmath68 , i.e. as a function of position and some arbitrary set of parameters , @xmath69 . the exact values of these parameters can ( formally ) be calculated from optimizing @xmath70 . one major advantage of relying upon this method is that it reduces the effect of numerical artifacts from iterative minimization . for example , we no longer enforce an arbitrary periodicity upon the lt wavevector . this subsection is not about a technique , but a classification of two ways that ground states may be related to each other , and thus of two kinds of phase boundaries in the phase diagrams ( sec . [ sec : phase ] and appendix [ app : phase - boundaries ] ) . we call these two concepts `` encompassing states '' and `` families of degenerate states '' . we call a ground state `` encompassed '' if it is a special case of another , more general state . for example , a ferromagnet is encompassed by a helimagnet , since letting the helimagnetic angle go to zero produces a ferromagnet . `` more general '' means there is a continuous family of states such that each particular combination of couplings @xmath6 s completely determines a particular member of that family . moreover , the ( more general ) encompassing state necessarily spans at least one more dimension of spin space , so if the encompassed state is coplanar , the encompassing one is non - coplanar . however , while every encompassing state is more general than the state it encompasses , not every more general state will encompass a particular ground state . for example , the asymmetric conic is more general than the splayed ferromagnet ( both of these states are defined in sec . [ sec : conic ] ) , but it does not encompass the splayed ferromagnet ; there is , however , a third class that encompasses both these classes . _ by contrast , `` degenerate states '' means that for certain combinations of @xmath6 s , there is a continuous family of exactly degenerate ground states . _ most commonly , this is the result of _ decoupling _ between sublattices of spins , meaning one can apply a global rotation limited to just one of the sublattices while remaining in the degenerate manifold . this can come about in two ways . the trivial way is when all @xmath6 s that couple those sublattices vanish . the more interesting way is when the couplings are nonzero , but cancel generically in all the ground states ; the simplest example of this kind is the @xmath16@xmath4 antiferromagnet on the square @xcite or bcc @xcite lattice , in the @xmath4-dominated regime in which each of the even and odd sublattices realizes plain nel order . apart from decoupling , degenerate manifolds are also sometimes realized by simultaneous rotations involving all sublattices with some mutual constraint ( e.g. in the nearest - neighbor kagom lattice , the constraint that the spins add to zero in every triangle ) . independent of the categories mentioned , these degenerate families may either be _ simply degenerate _ , meaning the ground state manifold is labeled by a finite number of parameters one nontrivial angle in the case of the @xmath16@xmath4 antiferromagnet or else _ highly degenerate _ , meaning the number of parameters scales with size as @xmath71 with @xmath72 . an example with trivially decoupled , highly degenerate ground states is a layered lattice with vanishing interlayer couplings , so the number of free parameters scales as @xmath73 ; the @xmath74 kagom antiferromagnet is a mutally constrained , highly degenerate case with @xmath75 parameters , i.e. extensively many . both the simply and highly degenerate families also have clear signatures in reciprocal space . in the simple case , the optimal wavevectors are discrete and related by symmetry , e.g. the @xmath16@xmath4 square lattice antiferromagnet has @xmath76 or @xmath77 ; in this case , the degeneracy lies in the freedom to mix these degenerate lt eigenmodes with different coefficients , not from the presence of extended ( one- , two- , or even three - dimensional ) surfaces in the brillouin zone . by contrast , in the highly degenerate scenario , typically holding for special combinations of couplings , the lt optimum wavefectors occur not just at isolated @xmath49 in the brillouin zone , but on extended ( one- , two- , or even three - dimensional ) surfaces , i.e. one has degenerate eigenmodes of the lt matrix that are not symmetry - equivalent . the rhombohedral lattice with @xmath16 , @xmath4 , and @xmath20 has a degenerate one - parameter family of wavevectors corresponding to different coplanar spirals @xcite . the three - dimensional pyrochlore lattice with only nearest - neighbor ( @xmath78 couplings is a well - known example of the highly degenerate scenario , requiring extensive number of parameters . in that case , the minimum @xmath79 eigenvalue is uniform throughout the brillouin zone @xcite ( a so - called `` flat band '' ) . what encompassing states and families of degenerate states have in common is to serve as bridges between simple states . in the `` encompassing '' case , the encompassing state is typically stable in a domain of parameter space of nonzero measure . when one adjacent phase in a phase diagram is encompassed by the other , they are necessarily related ( in our @xmath80 phase diagram ) by a continuous transition , usually involving a symmetry breaking . in contrast , degenerate families are ( frequently ) confined to phase boundaries . even when they occupy a finite area in a slice of parameter space ( e.g. the @xmath81 plane when all other couplings are zero ) , turning on additional couplings can remove the degeneracy . a corollary is that the naive classification of continuous or first - order phase transitions does not work . consider two phases separated by a phase boundary on which a degenerate family is stable . each of the two phases ( or the limit of either as the boundary is approached ) is a special case from the degenerate family . since the limits taken from the opposite directions are different , it appears at first as an abrupt transition . on the other hand , it is possible to take the system continuously from one phase to the other if we pause the parameter variation when we hit the phase boundary , and follow a path through the degenerate manifold from one of the limiting states to the other one . furthermore , turning on additional parameters generically destroys the degeneracy . that converts the degenerate family into an encompassing family , and the single phase boundary into two continuous ones . specifically , starting in one of the main phases , we cross a small strip of phase diagram in which the configuration evolves ( determined by the parameter combination ) from one of the limiting states to the other one , and then enter the other of the main phases . thus , the `` encompassed '' kind of transition is distinct from either a first - order transition ( between two unrelated states ) or an ordinary continous one , and will be indicated on phase diagrams with a distinct kind of line . the `` cluster '' method is a rigorous analytic approach to ground states , alternative to the lt mode approach . @xcite , which depends on decomposing the hamiltonian into terms for ( usually overlapping ) clusters , and finding the ground states for one cluster . if these ground states can be patched together so as to agree where they overlap , the resulting global state must be a ground state and all ground states must be decomposable in this fashion . in this way we can characterize the degenerate states appearing for two special combinations of @xmath6 s . in this case , the cluster is a triangle ( one face of an octahedron , including one site each from the @xmath12 , @xmath13 , and @xmath14 sublattices ) . the ground state of such a triangle is the usual 120@xmath82 arrangement of spins . if all such triangles are to be satisfied , then wherever two of them share an edge , the respective unshared spins are forced to have identical directions in the present case , spins on opposite corners of the octahedron . thus , a line of @xmath12 sublattice spins in the @xmath12 direction ( or similarly of the other sublattices in their directions ) is constrained to be the same . this high degeneracy is not limited to the single point in parameter space @xmath83 . if we turn on @xmath4 , which couples the nearest neighbors aling those lines of spins , the same configurations remain the ground state until @xmath4 is negative and its magnitude sufficiently large compared to @xmath84 ; less obviously , the same thing is true for @xmath85 , varied together . this allows two different kinds of highly degenerate state : \(a ) one sublattice ( say @xmath12 ) has @xmath86 along every line . within the other sublattices , each @xmath87 plane has an independent rotation about the @xmath88 axis . thus the spin directions are @xmath89 where @xmath47 is a different unit vector in each plane , and we take the @xmath90 or @xmath91 sign in the @xmath13 or @xmath14 sublattice , respectively . the common - origin plot for this state looks superficially like a conic spiral , the cone being formed by the @xmath13 and @xmath14 spin directions . in reality , whereas an incommensurate spiral gives a uniform weight along the spiral in the common - origin plot , this state gives a random distribution which approaches uniformity only in the limit of a very large system . ( b ) . for a second family of ( discretely ) degenerate states , we choose @xmath92 ; \\ \ss(n_1,n_2 + 1/2,n_3 ) & = & \frac{1}{\sqrt{2 } } [ -f_1(n_1 ) , 0 , f_3(n_3 ) ] ; \\ \ss(n_1 , n_2 , n_3 + 1/2 ) & = & \frac{1}{\sqrt{2 } } [ f_1(n_1 ) , -f_2(n_2),0 ] . \label{eq : j1cuboc } \end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath93 are arbitrary . notice that ( [ eq : j1cuboc ] ) uses ( a subset of ) the cuboctahedral directions . typically , in a sufficiently large system , all those directions are used nearly equally ; the common - origin plot would show a cuboctahedron . however , the spins do not have a regular pattern in space since ( [ eq : j1cuboc ] ) is random , with a discrete degeneracy @xmath73 in a system of @xmath59 cells . the states ( [ eq : j1cuboc ] ) represent a degenerate family of states , as formulated in sec . [ sec : bridging ] : the optimum lt eigenvalues are found at _ all _ wavevectors @xmath52 lying on the ( 100 ) axes . we are _ not _ interested in the high degeneracy for its own sake ; its significance is that various kinds of ordered states can be selected out of it , by turning on additional couplings ( even infinitesimally ) . thus , the high - degeneracy parameter combinations will be corners of phase domains in the phase diagram . let @xmath94 be the net spin of the octahedron centered on @xmath27 . @xmath95 where @xmath27 is a cubic lattice vertex and @xmath96 means site @xmath97 is on one of the six bonds from @xmath27 , consider a hamiltonian written as @xmath98 on the one hand , expanding the square shows this is simply the antiferromagnet with @xmath99 . on the other hand , it is obvious from ( [ eq : ham - octzero ] ) that any configuration with a net ( classical ) spin of zero on every octahedron is a ground state . this is another example of a degenerate ground state family ( sec . [ sec : bridging ] ) ; in this case the continuous degeneracy is macroscopic . this hamiltonian is constructed in exactly the same way as those of well - known highly frustrated lattices ( kagom , checkerboard , half - garnet , pyrochlore ) that have similar ground state degeneracies . several different collinear or coplanar ground states can be stabilized within the octahedral lattice , only one of which requires couplings beyond @xmath4 . we will describe them from the smallest to the largest magnet unit cells . the most elementary of these is the ferromagnetic state , in which all spins are aligned in the same direction , and which obviously requires predominantly positive couplings . this state is composed of a ( 0,0,0 ) lt mode with equal amplitudes on every sublattice ( so the normalization condition is already satisfied ) . there is also the `` three - sublattice 120@xmath100 antiferromagnetic state '' , whose unit cell is the primitive cell . each of the three sublattices has a uniform direction ; the net inter - sublattice couplings are antiferromagnetic , so ( as in the ground state of a single antiferromagnetic triangle ) the respective spin directions are 120@xmath82 apart and coplanar . thus this state , too , is characterized by ordering wavevector @xmath101 , but not the same lt mode as the ferromagnetic state . instead , this one is from the two degenerate modes at @xmath101 that are orthogonal to the uniform mode . ( any combination of these modes has unequal magnitude on the different sublattices , which is why _ both _ modes need to be present in the spin state , combined with different spin directions . ) this state is a special case of the highly degenerate ground states found when only @xmath102 ( sec . [ sec : onlyj1 ] ) . the next group of coplanar states are the @xmath103 antiferromagnetic states , of which there are three kinds , characterized by having ordering wavevectors of type ( 0,0,1/2 ) , ( 0,1/2,1/2 ) , or ( 1/2,1/2,1/2 ) . each of these states is antiferromagnetic overall within every sublattice ; the sublattices decouple , since any inter - sublattice interaction couples a spin in one sublattice to equal numbers of spins pointing in opposite directions in the other sublattice . these are lt states ; in the ( 0,0,1/2 ) and ( 0,1/2,1/2 ) cases , the lt mode used is nonzero on only one sublattice , and a different one of the three symmetry - related wavevectors is used for each sublattice ( the one with the same distinguished direction ) . e.g. the @xmath12 sublattice uses ( 1/2,0,0 ) or ( 0,1/2,1/2 ) modes . notice that in these two cases , the spins repeat ferromagnetically along some directions ( within a sublattice ) ; this is a consequence of the anisotropy of the intra - sublattice couplings . qualitatively , these states are stable when @xmath4 is different from @xmath18 . all of these states can be realized with collinear spins . lastly , the octahedral lattice admits helimagnetic states . these states require at least @xmath20 couplings to become stabilized . the helimagnetic states must be composed entirely out of @xmath104 modes . this is because any other wave - vector would break the symmetry between the sublattices . more precisely , helimagnetic states are generically a function of one variable , @xmath105 , and are therefore equivalent to a one - dimensional system . it will therefore be amenable to stacking vector analysis , developed in [ sec : conic ] . but using stacking vectors to transform the octahedral lattice to a one - dimensional chain will necessarily produce a non - bravais lattice unless the stacking vector ( 111 ) ( or a permutation of sign ) . and any helimagnetic mode in the one - dimensional non - bravais lattice will break normalization in the octahedral lattice , since some spin directions would be represented more than others ( this will be allowable for conics because they mix multiple modes , but helimagnets are explictly single mode ) . therefore , the only allowable stacking vector ( and by implication , wave - vector ) is ( 111 ) . the octahedral lattice possesses two kinds of `` cuboctahedral '' state , stable in different domains of parameter space , for which the common - origin plot takes the form of a cuboctahedron , i.e. twelve spin directions of the form @xmath106 and its permutations [ fig . [ fig : cop](b ) ] . the magnetic unit cell is @xmath107 for both of these true cuboctahedral states ( spuriously cuboctahedral states were remarked in sec . [ sec : onlyj1 ] ) . they differ in that the angles between neighboring spins ( which are in different sublattices ) is 60@xmath82 in one kind of cuboctahedral state but is 120@xmath82 in the other kind . as worked through in this section , the cuboctahedral states can be understood from any of three approaches : * cluster construction : the hamiltonian can be decomposed into a sum of terms , each for an octahedron ; we can patch together the ground states of the respective octahedra to obtain a ground state of the whole lattice . ( for 60@xmath82 cuboctahedral only . ) * degenerate perturbation theory : two special sets of couplings give degenerate families of ground states , out of which a small additional coupling can select the cuboctahedral state . ( for 120@xmath82 cuboctahedral only . ) * the luttinger - tisza framework of sec . [ sec : lt ] . ( for both kinds of cuboctahedral state . ) the 120@xmath82 cuboctahedral state is a subset of the @xmath16only antiferromagnetic ( @xmath83 ) ground states described above ( sec . [ sec : onlyj1 ] ) . thus , this state is stabilized even in the limit as @xmath4 ( or other distant couplings ) become arbitrarily small . it is the only non - coplanar state we found that does not require any couplings beyond @xmath4 and @xmath18 . the first cuboctahedral state noticed was in the @xmath16@xmath4 magnet on the kagome lattice @xcite , with @xmath16 ferromagnetic and @xmath4 antiferromagnetic . there is a range of ratios @xmath108 in which the magnetic unit cell on the kagome lattice is @xmath109 . taking that cell as given , the possible ground states are those of the twelve - site cluster made by giving periodic boundary conditions to one unit cell a cluster which is topologically equivalent to a single cuboctahedron ( even when couplings to any distance are taken into account ) , and hence include the cuboctahedral state . turning to the present case of the octahedral lattice , in fact this is a union of cuboctahedral cages surrounding cube centers , complementary to the octahedral clusters surrounding the cube vertices . we can apply the `` cluster '' construction ( see sec . [ sec : cluster ] ) to these cages by representing its lattice hamiltonian as a sum of cuboctahedron hamiltonians , with @xmath110 , @xmath111 , @xmath112 , and @xmath113 ( @xmath16 , @xmath4 , @xmath18 and @xmath22 are shared by two cuboctahedra ) ; also @xmath114 and @xmath115 . consider for a moment the ground state of 12 spins placed on an isolated cuboctahedron , @xcite with couplings @xmath116 , @xmath117 , @xmath118 , and @xmath119 . now , it is well known that , on a chain ( i.e. a discretized circle ) , @xmath120 and ( small ) @xmath121 give a gradual , coplanar spin spiral ; on a circle with the right number of sites the spin directions point radial to that circle . roughly speaking , the three - dimensional analog of this happens on a cuboctahedron , which is a discretized sphere : if @xmath116 is ferromagnetic and one of the more distant couplings is antiferromagnetic , the spin ground state is a direct image of the center - to - vertex vector in the cuboctahedron ( modulo a global @xmath9 rotation of the spins ) . this notion only works for the 60@xmath82 kind of cuboctahedral , occurring for @xmath122 , in which the nearest neighbors are ( relatively ) close to being parallel . to build a global state in which every cuboctahedron has the cuboctahedral spin configuration , the difficult part is just to make the spins agree where they are shared between cuboctahedra : that is achieved by applying mirror operations in alternate layers of cuboctahedra , such that e.g. the @xmath123 components are multiplied by @xmath124 . when we have only @xmath83 couplings , the ground state is a degenerate state with @xmath125 angles between nearest neighbors , as written in eq . ( [ eq : j1cuboc ] ) of sec . [ sec : onlyj1 ] . in that degenerate state of sec . [ sec : onlyj1 ] the spins take ( some of or all of ) the cuboctahedral directions , but do not have a genuine cubic spin symmetry . as soon as an arbitrarily small antiferromagnetic @xmath4 is added as a perturbation , a subset of these states is selected , which is the @xmath125 kind of cuboctahedral state . in the notation of ( [ eq : j1cuboc ] ) , this true 120@xmath126 cuboctahedral state takes the following form : @xmath127 ; \\ \ss(n_1,n_2+{\frac{\footnotesize{1}}{\footnotesize{2}}},n_3 ) & = & \frac{1}{\sqrt{2 } } [ ( -1)^{n_1 } , 0 , \pm(-1)^{n_3 } ] ; \\ \ss(n_1 , n_2 , n_3+{\frac{\footnotesize{1}}{\footnotesize{2 } } } ) & = & \pm \frac{1}{\sqrt{2 } } [ ( -1)^{n_1 } , ( -1)^{n_2},0 ] . \end{aligned}\ ] ] [ eq : fullcuboc ] where @xmath90 corresponds to the 120@xmath82 state and @xmath91 to the 60@xmath82 . alternatively , both cuboctahedral states can be understood within the lt framework . for certain domains of parameter values , the optimal lt modes have wavevectors @xmath128 of @xmath129 type . it can be worked out that for e.g. @xmath130 , one eigenmode has amplitudes @xmath131 on sublattices @xmath132 , i.e. its support is only on the @xmath12 sublattice . each of the other two eigenmodes has its support equally on the @xmath13 and @xmath14 sublattices , the amplitudes being @xmath133 . when the first eigenmode is optimal , we get the decoupled @xmath134 antiferromagnet already described in sec . [ sec : coplane ] ; when either of the two - sublattice eigenmodes is stable , a cuboctahedral states is found . it is obviously impossible to satisfy normalization in a spin state using just one of the two - sublattice modes , since its amplitude vanishes on the third sublattice . to build a normalized ground state , it is necessary and sufficient to form a linear combination using all three of the symmetry - related @xmath49 wavevectors , associating each with a different orthogonal spin component . thus the spin directions are @xmath135 , with all possible permutations and sign changes , as we already saw in eq . ( [ eq : fullcuboc ] ) . these states could be called a commensurate triple - q state . the eigenmode with amplitudes of form @xmath136 gives the 60@xmath82 cuboctahedral whereas the one of form @xmath137 gives the 120@xmath82 cuboctahedral state . from the lt viewpoint , one would naively expect to construct similar noncoplanar cuboctahedral states of cubic symmetry using @xmath49 of ( 1/2,1/2,0 ) : why are they absent ? after all , the @xmath138 type wavevectors are threefold degenerate , just like the ( 1/2,0,0 ) wavevectors from which the cuboctahedral states are built , and it is straightforward to follow the analogy of those states to construct a ( 1/2 , 1/2,0 ) cuboctahedral ( just allotting each mode one of the three cartesian directions in spin space ) . furthermore , if we include @xmath22 and @xmath23 couplings in the hamiltonian , there is a certain region of parameter space in which @xmath49 = ( 1/2 , 1/2 , 0 ) can indeed be optimal , with the optimal lt eigenmodes being orthogonal to the eigenmodes that make up the @xmath139 type antiferromagnetic state . hence in that region , the putative @xmath140 , cuboctahedral state really is a ground state . but closer examination of the lt matrix for @xmath141 shows that neither the cuboctahedral state , nor any noncollinear state , is _ forced_. at this high symmetry point in the brillouin zone , all intersublattice contributions to the lt matrix @xmath53 [ see eq . ( [ eq : ham - fourier ] ) ] cancel . that means the @xmath142 is a diagonal matrix . its eigenvalues are @xmath143 for the mode of the ( 1/2,1/2,0 ) antiferromagnet , plus two degenerate eigenvalues @xmath144 for the modes of interest here . furthermore , the fact that only @xmath4 and @xmath23 enter the formula indicates that all other couplings cancel out . not only are spins of different sublattices decoupled , but each sublattice decouples into two interpenetrating ( and unfrustrated ) tetragonal lattices . ( the latter decoupling is reminiscent of the decoupling of the @xmath4-only simple cubic antiferromagnet . ) in light of these decouplings , we can not call this state a ( 1/2 , 1/2 , 0 ) cuboctahedral ; it is merely a particular configuration out of a degenerate family that also includes collinear states . the conic spiral states are generically incommensurate and constitute the most common class of non - coplanar state that we found . they are layered states , where the spins are all parallel in a given layer . that is , the lattice breaks up into layers , normal to some stacking direction @xmath145 in real space . we encountered only @xmath146 stacked conic spirals , so we concentrate on that case , but stacking directions other than @xmath147 should be feasible in principle . within each layer , all the spin directions are the same ; as you look in each successive layer , the spin directions rotate around an axis @xmath148 in spin space . due to this layering , it is possible to map a conic state to a one - dimensional `` chain lattice '' ( as introduced in sec . [ sec : mapping ] ) , which is a significant simplfication in the analysis . considered from the lt viewpoint , a conic spiral is a mix of two different modes : two spin components follow an incommensurate wavevector @xmath52 , spiraling as in a helimagnet , and the third component follows a commensurate wavevector @xmath149 ( @xmath150[af ] in the asymmetric - conic case ) . in both @xmath52 and @xmath149 , all components transverse to the stacking direction must be zero . the conic spirals divide into subclasses , the alternating and asymmetric conic spirals , according to whether they are symmetric under the ( spin space ) symmetry of reflecting in the plane normal to @xmath148 . in the octahedral lattice , the only type of conic spiral we observed was the asymmetric conic however , in the chain lattice we find that two distinct classes of conic spiral are possible : the asymmetric conic and the alternating conic . in principle , both states should be possible in the octahedral lattice , but an analysis in terms of stacking vectors ( see sec . [ sec : mapping ] ) reveals that longer range couplings ( @xmath151 ) would be necessary to stabilize the conics . in the asymmetric conic , the ground states are linear combinations of helimagnetic and ferromagnetic modes . let the stacking direction be along the @xmath14 axis , so all spins are only functions of @xmath14 . ( alternatively , we could interpret @xmath14 as the position in the one - dimensional chain lattice of sec . [ sec : mapping ] , below . ) the helimagnetic part is parametrized with a rotating unit vector : @xmath152 where @xmath153 form an orthonormal triad . then @xmath154 with @xmath155 . the spins in each sublattice rotate about some common cone axis @xmath48 in spin space ; spins of the same sublattice have the same component along the cone axis ( giving net magnetic moments for both sublattices of @xmath156 , where @xmath157 is the component of a spin of sublattice @xmath27 along the common axis ) . the different sublattices are antiferromagnetically coupled , so these net moments have different signs . and because the couplings within the sublattices are not equal to those of the other sublattice , the magnitude of the net moments are not equal . this can be easier to understand if we think in terms of common - origin plots ( see figure [ fig : cop ] ) , since then the spins all lie upon the surface of a sphere . in the common origin plot , each sublattice forms a cone . these cones are along the same axis , but oppositely oriented and their azimuthal ( conic ) angles are not equal . in the alternating conic , one sublattice is a _ spiral , while the other is always a combination of the same helimagnetic mode and an antiferromagnetic mode . this state is thus represented , again using ( [ eq : rotating - ahat ] ) : @xmath158 where @xmath159 for the alternating conic . returning again to our common - origin plot ( see figure [ fig : cop ] ) , one sublattice forms a great circle along the equator of the sphere . the other sublattice now traces cones on each side of this equator ( the common axis is the vector normal to the circle ) . the spins of the second sublattice alternate between the two sides of the equator , giving the antiferromagnetic component . thus , the difference between sublattices is more fundamental in the case the alternating conics than in asymmetric conics . there are two other states essentially related to these conic spirals , but are important enough to deserve their own names ( this is much the same as ferromagnetism being a special case of helimagnetism ) . we term these states ferromagnetic and ferrimagnetic splayed states . consider the alternating conic in the limit of the polar angle going to 0 or 1/2 . in both cases , the spins are confined to a plane , but they are emphatically not in a helimagnetic configuration . the sublattice that was helimagnetic is now ferromagnetic and the sublattice that was conic now merely alternates ( that is , reflects about equatorial plane without rotation ) . if the polar angle is 0 ( 1/2 ) , then the dot product of spins in different sublattice is positive ( negative ) and the state is a ferromagnetic ( ferrimagnetic ) splayed state . while the difference between ferromagnetic and ferrimagnetic splayed state seems rather trivial here , it is more dramatic when we think of asymmetric conics . the ferrimagnetic splayed state is produced when one of the conic angles and the polar angle go to 1/2 while the other conic angle remains arbitrary . but because the coupling between sublattices is antiferromagnetic for the asymmetric conic , the conic angles of the sublattices will always confine spins to opposite sides of the `` equator . '' this means that the asymmetric conic will never continuously transform into a ferromagnetic splayed state , and so such a transition would necessarily be first order . for the cases of incommensurate conic spirals , our main analytic method is variational : we assume a functional form for the spin configuration ( based on interative minimization results ) depending on several parameters , and optimize exactly with respect to them . say we know that the correct ground state is stacked a stack of planes with identical spins in practice this is determined empirically from the outcome of iterative minimization ( sec . [ sec : iter - min ] ) then the variational problem is equivalent to a one - dimensional ( and hence simpler ) one : layers of the 3d lattice may be mapped into a chain containing inequivalent sublattices . this mapping is fruitful in two or three ways . first , we could ( and did ) explore the chain lattice ground states using interative minimization , in much longer system lengths than would be practical in an @xmath160 system . second , it is unifying , in that various stackings of various three - dimensional lattices map to the same chain lattice . finally , it illuminates what conditions are necessary in order to obtain non - coplanar states . notice that if a stacked state is the true ground state of the three - dimensional lattice , its projection must be the true ground state of the chain projection ( since the chain lattice states correspond exactly to a subset of three - dimensional states ) ; but of course the converse is false : the proven optimal state of the chain lattice might be irrelevant to the three - dimensional lattice , when a different ( e.g. unstacked ) kind of ground state develops a lower energy . as coupling parameters are varied , that different state might become stable in a first - order transition ; our only systematic ways to address that possibility are ( i ) iterative minimization ( ii ) watching for an exchange of stability between two lt eigenmodes at different wavevectors . and even with this method , we had to rely primarily upon iterative minimization for reliable results , as lt analysis is insufficient to determine the ground state , particularly in cases where a ground state can not be constructed from the optimal lt modes . for the cases that concern us here , the chain lattice has a basis of two sites per cell , with inversion symmetry at each site ; we take the lattice constant to be unity . the mappings to chain sites @xmath14 is given by @xmath161 where @xmath145 is a vector of integers , having no common factor . we let `` even '' sites be those with @xmath14 integer and `` odd '' sites be those with @xmath162 integer+1/2 . as in three dimensions , we consider inter - sublattice couplings @xmath116 and @xmath118 , as well as intra - sublattice couplings out to distances 1 and 2 , namely @xmath117 and @xmath119 ( between even spins ) or @xmath163 and @xmath164 ( between odd spins ) . notice that , if @xmath165 and @xmath166 , the chain system reduces to a bravais lattice ( with lattice constant 1/2 ) and its ground states are ( at most ) coplanar spirals , as explained in sec . [ sec : lt ] ; that rules out @xmath167 . notice that for stackings in low symmetry directions ( and thus requiring larger coefficients in the @xmath145 vector ) , short range @xmath0 couplings in the octahedral lattice map to long range @xmath168 couplings in the chain lattice , e.g. @xmath169 maps @xmath170 through @xmath171 to @xmath172 through @xmath173 . because longer range couplings quickly appear , it is reasonable to explore them in the chain lattice . in order to organize our exploration of parameter space , we shall call @xmath116 , @xmath117 , and @xmath117 `` primary '' couplings ; @xmath118 , @xmath119 , and @xmath164 are `` secondary '' couplings , and if necessary are assumed small compared to the primary couplings . we encountered @xmath174 stackings often enough in the iterative minimization , and we searched for @xmath175 type stackings also ( although this search was ultimately unsuccessful ) . the @xmath176 mapping is illustrated in real space in fig . [ fig : mapping ] . the numerical values of the mapped couplings is given by a matrix multiplication : @xmath177 where @xmath178 is the energy within a plane of constant @xmath14 in the octahedral lattice . notice that , for this stacking vector , couplings @xmath16 through @xmath22 are projected down to @xmath179 through @xmath117 . this helps explain the absence of stable conics in the octahedral lattice . we only find conics in the chain lattice for @xmath118 or longer - range couplings . but for this stacking @xmath176 , require at least a @xmath180 coupling to generate an analogous coupling ( for the alternating conic , @xmath181 is more likely , given the asymmetry between the sublattices ) . and @xmath13 sublattices ( red x s ) are projected onto the same point , while those in the @xmath14 sublattice ( blue squares ) are mapped onto a different point ( again a function z ) . as such , there are twice as sites mapped onto any x as there are mapped onto a square . the spatial structure is shown in dotted lines , while couplings are shown in solid lines . ] this is a hypothetical ( but likely ) class of states . here `` transversely modulated '' means that when we decompose the lattice as a stacking of layers , a single layer does not have a single spin direction , but instead a pattern of spin directions . whereas the asymmetric conic spiral used ordering wavevectors ( say ) @xmath182 and @xmath183 , and the alternating conic spiral used @xmath182 and @xmath184 , a transversely modulated spiral might replace the first wavevector by e.g. @xmath185 . equivalently , if we look at a column of successive cells along the stacking direction , in a plain conic spiral ( whether alternating or asymmetric ) , adjacent columns are in phase , but in the transversely modulated conic spirals , different columns are offset in phase according to a regular pattern . it should be possible to generalize the chain mapping to such cases , but we have not tried it . here we describe the incompletely understood `` double - twist '' state , which has attributes in common with both cuboctahedral and conic states , and was observed only for a small set of couplings ( @xmath1862 , @xmath187 , @xmath20=1 , all others zero ) . these couplings were selected to give @xmath188 , as the ground states previously encountered had a @xmath49 either along the @xmath189 direction or on the edges of the brillouin zone . for a given @xmath190 , the value of @xmath4 is determined by : @xmath191 we particularly studied the @xmath192 case . ( note that iterative minimization necessarily probes commensurate states , due to our boundary conditions . ) this corresponds to @xmath193 , according to eq . ( [ eq : j2-q - doubletwist ] ) . the double twist state is , to good approximation , composed solely of @xmath194 modes ( for normalization , there will necessarily be other wave - vectors , but these have relatively small amplitudes ) . unlike previous states , each sublattice has nonzero contributions from all @xmath194 wavevectors , rather than a subset . the weight of each sublattice in a given @xmath194 mode differs between sublattices , approximately in proportion to relative weight in the lt optimal mode with a similar @xmath49 . the spatial variation produced by this combination of modes is complicated . there is a stacking axis in real space , which we take to be @xmath195 without loss of generality . spin space is characterized by three orthonormal basis vectors : @xmath48 defines a conic axis , around which the other two basis vectors @xmath88 and @xmath47 rotate as a function of @xmath14 : [ eq : a - b - basis ] @xmath196 we can parameterize this cartoon of the double twist state as @xmath197 with @xmath198 , where @xmath199 is an arbitrary phase , similarly @xmath200 . note the coordinates @xmath201 in @xmath202 are the actual sites for sublattice @xmath97 , which are half - odd - integers in the @xmath97 component . thus , addition to the twisting of the basis vectors along the stacking direction , in ( [ eq : a - b - basis ] ) , there are spatial modulations transverse to the stacking direction that appear in the coefficients of @xmath203 and @xmath48 in ( [ eq : doubletwist ] ) while the form described by ( [ eq : doubletwist ] ) is close to what we observe with iterative minimization , it unfortunately does not satisfy normalization : the ground state necessarily contains admixtures of non - optimal modes . ( to satisfy normalization using only the @xmath194 modes would require four - component spins . ) in eq . ( [ eq : doubletwist ] ) , @xmath204 should ideally be the amplitudes ( on the three respective sublattices ) of the lt eigenvector at @xmath205 , while @xmath206 is a weighting factor that reduces the deviations of the spins in ( [ eq : doubletwist ] ) from uniform normalization . what if we demanded , not normalization of all spins , but only that the mean - squared value of @xmath207 be one in each sublattice ? since each cosine or sine factor has mean square of 1/2 , and since @xmath208 , we ought then to have @xmath209 . projecting the actual result of iterative minimization onto such modes gave @xmath210 . also , whereas @xmath211 in the actual lt eigenvectors , we found @xmath212 in the results of iterative minimization . the double twist state can be viewed as related to the hypothesized transversely - modulated conics or to the cuboctahedral states . in particular , the composition of this state in terms of lt modes is more similar to the cuboctahedral states than to any other configuration . the lt mode underlying this state , according to ( [ eq : j2-q - doubletwist ] ) , has a continuously variable wavevector as @xmath4 is varied . due to the limitations of iterative minimization with periodic boundary conditions , we have not followed the evolution of the double - twist state ; in particular , we do not know if it becomes incommensurate in both the stacking ( @xmath14 ) direction and the transverse directions . to understand how the ground states outlined in sec . [ sec : coplane],[sec : cuboc ] , [ sec : conic ] , and [ sec : doubletwist ] fit together , it is necessary to examine the phase diagrams of the octahedral and chain lattices . a series of representative cuts through the phase diagrams for both lattices gives us a general sense of their topology , and specifically in what regions non - coplanar states are stabilized . of course , rescaling the couplings by any positive factor gives an identical ground state ( with energy rescaled by the same factor ) . therefore we present the phase diagrams in rescaled coordinates , normally @xmath213 ( except when @xmath214 ) . an important aspect of all the phase diagrams is the classification of the transitions into first - order ( discontinuous ) , encompassed ( continuous ) , or degenerate : the distinction between the last two kinds was explained in sec . [ sec : bridging ] . whenever a continuous manifold of degenerate states is found ( always on a phase boundary ) , it is labeled in the diagrams by `` @xmath215 '' representing how the number of parameters ( needed to label the states ) scales with system size . in the octahedral lattice we are fortunate in that most kinds of states have energies that can be written exactly as a linear combination of couplings ( given in table [ tab : o - states ] @xcite ) ; the phase boundaries between such phases are simply the lines ( more exactly hyperplanes ) where the two energy functions are equal . most other phase boundaries are handled analytically , e.g. the helimagnetic state and its `` encompassed '' ferromagnetic and antiferromagnetic states . the only phase boundary _ not _ determined analytically from a variational form was the double - twist state , for which we do not have an exact variational form ; in this case the boundary was approximation by the lt phase boundary . we would expect that approximation to be accurate for any such complex phase that is built entirely from a star of symmetry - equivalent modes , provided the neighboring phase is built from other modes . .ground states of the octahedral lattice , with ordering wavevector @xmath52 . [ cols="^,^,^",options="header " , ] to classify phase boundaries in the chain lattice , it is important to consider limiting cases ( i.e. encompassed states in the nomenclature of sec . [ sec : bridging ] ) . states with variational parameters ( the helimagnetic wave - vector @xmath216 , as well as the conic / splay angles ) will undergo a second - order transition when their parameters reach a limiting value ( 0 or 1/2 for the helimagnet angle , 0 or 1/4 for conic angles ) . thus there is a second - order transition between helimagnetism and either antiferromagnetism or ferromagnetism , as well as between alternating conics and every other state ( except asymmetric conic ) . asymmetric conics , on the other hand , have second - order transitions to ferromagnetism , antiferromagnetism , helimagnetism , or ferrimagnetic splayed states , but not to ferromagnetic splayed states or alternating conics . the splayed states , meanwhile , can only have second - order transitions to ferromagnetism or antiferromagnetism ( depending upon which type of splayed state it is ) , to the other splayed state , or the appropriate conics . all other transitions are necessarily first - order . = 1 , @xmath118=0 , @xmath119=0 , @xmath164=0 . note similarity of phase boundaries to figure [ fig : o,1,0 ] , despite the lack of other similarity . ] consider first the case of @xmath116 ferromagnetic with no couplings beyond @xmath217 ( figure [ fig : c,1,0,0 ] ) . the phase diagram displays the same quadrant structure that we found in the octahedral lattice . however , the quadrant structure is not identical in the two lattices . first of all , the ground states are different in the chain lattice ( helimagnetism and splayed states instead of various forms of antiferromagnetism ) . secondly , the topology of the first and second order transitions are reversed for the two lattices . both of these phenomena can be explained by appealing to the additional degrees of freedom in the octahedral lattice . because the octahedral lattice has three spatial variables , it has ground states that can not exist in the chain lattice . this includes families of degenerate states at the phase boundaries of the octahedral lattice , producing second order transitions ( when there are second order transitions in the chain lattice , they are principally due to encompassing states ) . , @xmath118=0.28 , @xmath119=0 , @xmath164=0 . first state with asymmetric conic , and therefore first instance of non - coplanar ground states in the chain lattice . white circles denote helimagnetic phase , black circles anti - ferromagnetic , crosses splayed ferrimagnetic , and filled squares ( blue online ) asymmetric conic , the phases determined by numerically optimizing the variational form of the energy for these couplings . ] next , we examine the case @xmath116 antiferromagnetic and @xmath118 ferromagnetic ( figure [ fig : c,-1,28,0 ] ) . several states in the quandrant structure are different from the ferromagnetic @xmath116 case ( i.e. ferrimagnetic vs ferromagnetic splayed ) , but more interesting is the presence of the asymmetric conic - the first instance of a nonplanar state in the chain lattice . in much the same way that tuning @xmath118 in the octahedral lattice produced helimagnetic states around the phase boundaries of the more common states , so in the chain lattice do we find that the asymmetric conic state becomes stabilized around what would be the antiferromagnetic , ferrimagnetic splayed , helimagnetic triple point . and unlike the helimagnetic state in the octahedral lattice , which had both first order and second order transitions , the asymmetric conic has only second order transitions ( this is because it is an encompassing parametrization of every other state in this slice of the phase diagram ) . if we switch the sign of @xmath118 so that we have both @xmath218 and @xmath219 antiferromagnetic , the topology of the phase diagram ( not shown ) is much the same as figure [ fig : c,-1,28,0 ] . the afm / heli boundary gets shorter and moves towards the lower left , so that the four domains almost meet at a point . more significantly , the asymmetric conic does not appear along the phase boundaries . instead , all transitions are continuous , except that along both parts of ferrisplayed / heli boundary , the portion closest to the center is first - order . @xcite ( the point where the nature of the transition switches from first - order to continuous is thus of tricritical type . ) , @xmath118=0 , @xmath220 , @xmath164=0 . filled squares denote conic spiral phases , of which both kinds exist in this parameter slice : symmetric conic in the upper half ( blue online ) and asymmetric conic in the lower half ( red online ) . this is our first instance of an alternating conic . ] finally , we consider the case of @xmath116 ferromagnetic and @xmath119 antiferromagnetic ( figure [ fig : c,-1,0,-28 ] ) . this slice of parameter space is quite interesting as both types of conics are present . furthermore , the alternating conic now fills a relatively large region of parameter space . this is likely due to its highly non - linear dependence on @xmath119 ( as a function of its variational parameters ) . to conclude the paper , we first review our principal results , and then assess how much of what we learned is transferable to other lattices . the highlights of this paper include both concepts and methods , as well as results specific to the octahedral lattice , which seems relatively amenable to non - coplanar states . we pay special attention ( sec . [ sec : scarce ] ) to commonalities in the positioning of non - coplanar states in the phase diagram vis - - vis neighboring phases . our overall focus had a flavor of reverse engineering , in that we try to ask which couplings gave a certain phase ( or which gave any non - coplanar phase ) of course in order to do that , one must also understand the forwards question ( given the couplings , what is the phase ) . in that sense , our work is an example of a `` materials by design '' philosophy , whereby materials are tailored e.g. by adjusting their chemical content to have a combination of interactions leading to a desired state . our basic recipe to determine the ground state of a non - bravais lattice was a two - step process ( sec . [ sec : framework ] ) . first , an approximate ground state configuration is generated through iterative optimization ( sec . [ sec : iter - min ] ) of a lattice , starting from a random initial spin configuration . from this result , an idealized spin configuration is created . the idealized formulation , if it has parameters undetermined by symmetry , is then used variationally optimize the heisenberg hamiltonian ( sec . [ sec : var ] ) , yielding also the energy per site as a function of parameters . when this has been carried out for each candidate phase , a phase diagram ( sec . [ sec : phase ] ) can be generated . we refined the basic recipe further using three additional concepts or tricks . first , although the eigenmodes of the coupling matrix do not ( in the non - bravais case ) automatically lead us to the ground state , they sometimes do work and are always a useful guide . second , if the magnetic structure is layered , the three - dimensional octahedral lattice can be mapped to various ( non bravais ) one - dimensional lattices ; such `` chain '' lattices are much more tractable than the cuboctahedral one , but they still support non - coplanar states . third , we applied perturbation analysis to find second - order phase boundaries ( especially in combination with variational optimization , but also in the luttinger - tisza fourier analysis ) . namely , when a ground state could not be written exactly , but emerges as an instability of a closely related state e.g. a helimagnetic phase out of the ferromagnetic one we can expand around the latter state and solve for the couplings at which it goes unstable . the insufficiency of finding regions with the correct @xmath49 for the purpose of stabilizing a targeted magnetic structures is an important caveat for the lt approach . there are some combinations of modes which _ can not _ be stabilized by _ any _ set of pairwise interactions . that is , we can make them be optimal modes , but only if they are part of a degenerate family that includes other optimal lt modes that are unrelated by symmetry . we identified two categories of non - coplanar arrangements ( which could be defined for more general lattices than the octahedral one ) . first , there are the commensurate three-@xmath52 states , exemplified here by the highly symmetric `` cuboctabedral '' spin state ( sec . [ sec : cuboc ] ) . a second general class includes several varieties of incommensurate `` conic spiral '' ( sec . [ sec : conic ] ) . the commensurate three-@xmath52 states were found for both short and long range couplings ( i.e. @xmath6 s limited to no more than second - nearest neighbors or extending beyond second - nearest neighbors ) , while incommensurate conic spirals were possible for our lattice only when there are some @xmath6 s beyond the second neighbors . the conic spirals came in `` alternating '' or `` asymmetric '' subclasses ( stable in different parts of @xmath51 parameter space ) according to whether the spin components along the rotation axis were the same in each layer or alternated . this suggested that an additional subclass should exist , the `` transversely modulated conic spiral '' , which is non - uniform in each layer . in addition , we came across a `` double - twist '' ground state of high ( but not cubic ) symmetry , which has some commonalities with the cuboctahedral state but is probably best classified as a transverse - modulated conic spiral ( sec . [ sec : doubletwist ] ) . the conic spiral states were found to be a function of one spatial coordinate , allowing the more involved octahedral lattice to be mapped to the 1d chain lattice while preserving the ground state ( sec . [ sec : mapping ] ) . while this mapping is not a generic property of ground states in the octahedral lattice , it dramatically simplifies the analysis . moreover , the transformation provides a guide for the couplings required to stabilize the conic spiral states in the octahedral lattice . note that while the presence of inequivalent sublattices was necessary for the stabilization of non - coplanar states in the one - dimensional chain lattice , it is not so in higher dimensions . our octahedral - lattice couplings explicitly treat all sites equivalently ; non - coplanar states emerge either when it divides into unequal layers , that map to the chain lattice , or when it supports three - dimensional spin patterns not mappable to a chain lattice . the most dramatic examples when the chain lattice fails to represent the ground state in the octahedral lattice are the cuboctahedral states , for which there is no distinguished direction of variation ( or stacking vector ) one might have expected noncoplanar ground states to be generic ( in the non - bravais case , when they are possible at all ) but in fact they were seen in only a small portion of our parameter space ( sec . [ sec : phase ] ) . in fact , non - coplanar phases typically appeared in the phase diagram as `` bridges '' intermediate between simpler phases ; there are two scenarios of bridging , as formulated in sec . [ sec : bridging ] . first , typically along the phase boundary between two simple commensurate phases , one finds families of continuously degenerate states . usually , this infinite family includes coplanar states but the generic member is non - coplanar ; appropriate tuning of the couplings ( e.g. including further neighbors ) can select particular non - coplanar states in different ways . however , since the non - coplanar phase was limited ( in the first - order description ) to the ( measure zero ) boundaries between planar states , it naturally occupies only in a small region of the extended parameter space . indeed , the non - coplanar states we found in the octahedral lattice either occurred in small wedges , e.g. the cuboctahedral or double - twist states or were only observed as accidental instances of the degenerate family in cases where the degeneracy can not be broken ( within the parameter space we took as the scope of this paper ) , e.g. the asymmetric conic states . second , there are the `` encompassing states '' . such states become qualitatively different as a free parameter reaches some limiting value ( a canonical example is the collinear ferromagnet as a limiting case of planar spirals . ) in the chain lattice , we often observed phase boundaries between two states that did not encompass each other ; by tuning the couplings , it was sometimes possible to stabilize a third state which encompassed the original two , so the original first - order transition is converted to two successive second - order transitions with the encompassing state in the middle . this is the means by which conic spiral states are stabilized in the chain lattice . recently , a framework was proposed with a motivation similar to ours , the `` regular states '' @xcite which have a magnetic symmetry such that all sites symmetry - equivalent . the cuboctahedral state is an example . however , this is neither necessary nor sufficient for our own problem , to find all kinds of non - coplanar states : most of those , e.g. the double - twist state , are not regular , and conversely certain non - coplanar regular states are not stabilized by bilinear exchange interactions alone . now we consider moving beyond the somewhat artificial octahedral lattice . we examine the necessary conditions for non - coplanar spin configurations analogous to the two main classes we discovered ( cuboctahedral and conic spiral ) . can our results be applied to other lattices , such as the pyrochlore lattice ? the cuboctahedral states seem highly specific to the octahedral lattice , since they possess the same symmetries as the lattice . on the other hand , the lt construction ( each sublattice using different combinations of lt modes , the combinations being related by rotational symmetry of the different sublattices ) seems fairly generic . a general name for states like the cuboctahedral state might be `` commensurate triple - q state '' , referring to its content of lt modes . can such states be found in other lattices , or are there others in the octahedral lattice ? one answer requires that the hypothetical generalized state enjoys the full symmetry of the lattice , as the cuboctahedral state does . then the number of site classes must be a multiple of the number of spin components , i.e. of three . that will not work for the pyrochlore lattice , in which there are _ four _ site classes associated with ( 111 ) directions . however , it might work in the half - garnet lattice , which has _ site classes associated with ( 110 ) directions . a second , more systematic way to answer question follows the lt approach of sec . [ sec : cuboc - lt ] . the state must be a linear combination of three modes one for each component of spin . for the state to enjoy the full lattice symmetry , these must be the complete star of symmetry - related modes , thus it must have a threefold multiplicity . furthermore , each mode must be real ( otherwise one mode requires two spin components ) ; that happens only if the wavevector is half a reciprocal lattice vector , i.e. is at the center of one of the brillouin zone s faces . however , sec . [ sec : cuboc - no ] gave a cautionary example : finding such modes is not _ sufficient _ , because it might give a state with decoupled sublattices , so that the cuboctahedral state would merely be one undistinguished configuration in a continuous manifold of degenerate states that even includes collinear states . we can , in fact , borrow a notion from section [ sec : mapping ] to guess when this happens : mapping to a chain lattice , now applied to lt modes rather than to spin structures . the wavevector of one mode defines a set of planes , and thus a way of projecting both the sites and the mode onto a one - dimensional chain lattice . on the chain lattice , in order that the mode be real , the wavevector must be @xmath221 . if all the site planes were equivalent , the chain lattice is a bravais lattice and the mode must be a plane wave ; with @xmath222 , it is easy to see we get a decoupled pattern , namely @xmath223 . in the octahedral lattice , the @xmath224 modes have a threefold degeneracy and also correspond to a non - equivalent set of stacked planes , giving a cuboctahedral state , whereas the threefold degenerate @xmath224 modes have equivalent stacked planes and give decoupled states . in the pyrochlore lattice , the @xmath225 modes have a threefold multiplicity but have equivalent stacked planes ; on the other hand , the @xmath226 modes have inequivalent stacked planes but their multiplicity is fourfold . thus , in the pyrochlore case this path does not lead us to a cuboctahedral state . the third way to answer this question is via the cluster constuction of sec . [ sec : cuboc - cages ] , in which the lattice was decomposed into cuboctahedral cages . indeed , some other lattices consist of a union of roughly spherical `` cage '' clusters : e.g. , in the cr@xmath11si - type or `` a15 '' structure , the majority atoms form cages in the form of distorted icosahedra . furthermore , couplings can certainly be chosen such that the spin ground state of a cluster forms a the same polyhedron as the cluster itself . however , our ground - state construction ( sec . [ sec : cuboc - cages ] ) demanded that the spin configurations in adjacent cages be related by a _ reflection _ in spin space . thus the cages alternate between proper and improper rotations of a reference configuration . that is possible only if the cage centers form a _ bipartite _ lattice , which is not true for the a15 majority - atom cage centers . ( they form a bcc lattice with first- and second - neighbor links . ) long ago , kaplan and collaborators studied _ doubly _ magnetic spinels , and identified a ( noncoplanar ) `` ferrimagnetic spiral '' configuration arising from exchange interactions ( a spiral of this sort is responsible for multiferroic properties of cocr@xmath227o@xmath228 @xcite . this is actually a kind of double spiral ( each magnetic species accounting for one of the spirals ) . notice that we could map that structure to a chain , too , and that chain would have two inequivalent sites , which we point out is a precondition for developing a noncoplanar state . for a mapping to the 1d chain lattice to provide a non - coplanar state , the mapped sites must be inequivalent by translation ; if not , the chain lattice is a bravais lattice and must have ( at most ) a coplanar spiral state . this in turn depends on having _ unequal _ layers in the three - dimensional lattice , which is is impossible in the bravais case , but inequivalent layers can emerge from a non - bravais lattice with fully symmetric couplings . thus , as we worked out in sec . [ sec : mapping ] , a @xmath147 stacking in the octahedral lattice has twice as many sites on @xmath12 and @xmath13 bonds , constituting one kind of layer , as there are sites on @xmath14 bonds , constituting the other kind . the stacking direction is one in which the wavevector is incommensurate , and so we may seek out parameter sets for which @xmath49 goes incommensurate in a desired direction . however , this is no guarantee that the actual ground state is stacked , since it might be better energetically to combine these modes ( or ones nearby in @xmath34-space ) in a quite different way . thus , although we found some optimal @xmath49 wavevectors in directions other than @xmath147 , they were never the basis of a stacked spiral . the pyrochlore lattice is undoubtedly the most prominent non - bravais lattice that is likely to have non - coplanar states , and was a major motivation for the methods we developed in this paper for the more tractable octahedral lattice . relatively few works have tackled the isotropic spin problem on the pyrochlore lattice , beyond the ( massively degenerate ) case of only @xmath16 [ analogous to the @xmath229 case on the cuboctahedral lattice ] . the @xmath16@xmath4 , or @xmath16@xmath20 pyrochlore , with large antiferromagnetic @xmath16 , has a noncoplanar and somewhat obscure state that is not fully understood at @xmath80 @xcite . in the spinel geni@xmath227o@xmath228 , neutron diffraction found a @xmath230 ordering consisting of alternating kagom and triangular lattice layers with different densities of spins , reminiscent analogous of the @xmath147 stackings we have explored in the octahedral lattice . ref . invoked interactions out to @xmath22 in order to rationalize this state , but did not verify it was the ground state for the suggested interactions . finally , to address metallic pyrochlore compounds , a toy hamiltonian was investigated on the pyrochlore lattice with exchange couplings having rkky oscillations @xcite . very recently , a comprehensive study has been carried out for just the @xmath16@xmath4 phase diagram of the pyrochlore lattice by applying the methods of the present paper , which were equally effective in that case @xcite . about four complex states were identified , including that above mentioned state introduced by kawamura and collaborators @xcite ; a state reminiscent of our double - twist state ; a more complex generalization of a conic spiral ; and a cuboctahedral spin state that has less than cubic lattice symmetry , thus evading the negative conclusions of sec . [ sec : generalize - cuboc ] @xcite . we thank g .- w . chern , j - c . domenge , c. fennie , s. isakov , t. kaplan , m. lapa , and m. mostovoy for discussions and communications . c.l.h . was supported by nsf grant dmr-1005466 ; s. s. was supported by the cornell engineering learning initiatives program , the intel corporation , and the rawlings cornell presidential research scholars program . to move from a collection of ground states discovered at discrete points in parameter space to draw a full phase diagram is non - trivial . to analyze the phase boundaries of the more complicated states ( those with free parameters in their parametrization ) we depend on either variational optimization ( sec . refsec : var ) , or some kind of perturbation theory . perturbation theory can be applied in two places : either to the lt matrix , or to the hamiltonian of a parametrized spin state . the former is more straightforward , but is limited since most of the non - coplanar ground states are not exactly built from optimal lt eigenmodes . an obvious caveat for either of these applications of perturbation is that they detect continuous transitions , representing infinitesimal changes in the spins : it is a bifurcation of the local minima as points in the configuration space . but there the ground state might instead change due to a first order transition , when the energies of two separated configurations cross as parameters are varied . we do encounter the first - order case on occasion , though not nearly so often as the continuous one . to detect such discontinuous transitions , we must compare numerical calculations of the ground state energies . our original question was `` given a certain set of parameters , what is the ground state '' , but in these calculations it has been turned around to `` given a particular ground state , for what parameter sets is it favored ? '' we give an example here of the use of perturbation theory to discover the incipient instabilities of lt modes . such an approach may be especially useful to locate the phase boundaries for transitions from an lt exact ground state to more complicated , incommensurate states . if one is hunting for the parameter domain which would stabilize an particular mode with ordering wavevector @xmath52 , a substitute problem is to find the parameter domain in which this mode ( or one with @xmath49 similar to @xmath52 ) is the optimal lt mode . we reiterate the caveat from sec . [ sec : lt ] : such a discovery is a necessary but not sufficient criterion to guarantee the existence of any ground state based on the obtained @xmath49 . ( it is not sufficient because the actual ground state could feature additional modes or modes merely in the neighborhood of @xmath49 . ) the lt matrix elements @xmath231 and eigenvalues @xmath232 are functions of wavevector @xmath34 . imagine that @xmath233 is a point of high symmetry in the zone so as to be a stationary point for @xmath232 . for some parameter sets , we know , it is a minimum and in fact optimal ; whereas for some other parameter sets , we imagine , it is only a saddle point , and the minimum occurs at some nearby wavevector of lower symmetry . one first writes a taylor expansion of the lt matrix in powers of @xmath234 . using standard techniques ( formally identical to those used for eigenfunctions of the schrdinger equation ) it is straightforward to write a perturbation expansion for @xmath232 in powers of @xmath235 . inspection then shows where this stops being positive definite . since the lt matrix elements are bounded , so are the eigenvalues @xmath232 . so if the mode at @xmath233 goes unstable at quadratic order in @xmath235 , there must be higher - order positive terms in the expansion . thus the single local minimum of @xmath232 bifurcates in some fashion . the corresponding spin state can not be a commensurate spiral , but it might be representable in the framework of planar stackings ( sec . [ sec : mapping ] ) . this technique was used , for example , to analyze how the @xmath236 wavevector is destabilized in the lt phase diagram . simulations had found degenerate antiferromagnetic orderings at that wavevector ; if an incommensurate wavevector of form @xmath237 had been stabilized , this might have been the basis of a non - coplanar spiral stacked in the @xmath238 direction . here @xmath240 in ( [ eq : lt - matrix - diag ] ) means the indices other than @xmath97 , similarly @xmath241 in ( [ eq : lt - matrix - offdiag ] ) is the index other than @xmath242 . if we substitute @xmath243 , for example , the eigenvalues along this cut are @xmath244 + 2j_x(k ) ; \\ { { \tilde{j}}}({{\bf k } } , \pm ) = & -\frac{1}{2 } \big[2j_2'-4j_4+(j_f(0)+4j_4)(1+\cos k)+2j_x(k ) \big ] \nonumber \\ & \pm\frac{1}{2 } \bigg\ { [ ( j_2-j_2'+2j_4 - 2j_4 ' ) ( 1-\cos k ) + 2j_x(k)]^2 + 16j_x^2(0)(1+\cos k ) \bigg\ } ^{1/2}. \end{aligned}\ ] ] the major advantage of applying perturbation theory to a parametrization of the lattice s spins , rather than the lt matrix , is that it can accomodate a more generic ground state . this is not say that it avoids the disconnect between the state being perturbed and the actual ground state , if the perturbed state does not encompass the true ground state then the disconnect is required . however , this method does allow us to consider states composed of multiple lt wave - vectors . in the octahedral lattice , most of the ground state types we encountered even the noncollinear ones are essentially built using a single `` star '' of symmetry - related ordering wave - vectors . therefore , for the octahedral lattice , the actual phase diagram mostly reflects the lt phase diagram and it is preferable to find phase boundaries via the lt perturbation method illustrated above in sec . [ sec : pert - lt ] . for the chain lattice , however , the ground state is typically characterized by several wave - vectors . such multi - lt wave - vectors are all parametrized by some form of `` conic spirals , '' a mix of a planar spiral using the wavevector @xmath249 and a deviation along the wavevector @xmath250 where @xmath251 is either integer or half - integer ( since the chain lattice is 1d , the wave - vectors are as well ) . within a range of parameter space @xmath116 through @xmath252 ( @xmath253 and higher all 0 ) , these conic spirals are the most general form of ground state , making the problem of finding the ground state amenable to variational methods . as an illustration of determining the ground state by variational methods , we consider the problem of finding the phase boundaries for the `` alternating conic '' @xmath254 . the spin configurations in the lattice are parametrized by eq.([eq : altconic ] ) . without loss of generality , we take the odd sites to be the ones with planar spins . a symmetry relates the states ( [ eq : altconic ] ) to the other family of alternating conic configurations in which even and odd sites have swapped roles , if one also swaps in parameter space @xmath255 . up to interaction @xmath119 , the energy per unit cell is @xmath256 setting @xmath257 to minimize ( [ eq : e - alt - conic ] ) , we see that the optimal angle @xmath258 , is given by @xmath259 notice the symmetry under reversing the signs of @xmath116 and @xmath118 and @xmath260 . of course , a necessary condition is that the r.h.s . of ( [ eq : alpha - alt - conic ] ) lies in @xmath261 ( recall that @xmath262 by definition ) , otherwise @xmath263 is pinned to 0 or @xmath264 , which would be a planar spiral ( or possibly a collinear state , depending on the value of @xmath265 ) . plugging ( [ eq : alpha - alt - conic ] ) into eq . ( [ eq : e - alt - conic ] ) leaves @xmath266 as the only variational parameter : [ eq : e - alt - conic - psi ] @xmath267 if we drop the secondary couplings equation ( [ eq : e - alt - conic - psi ] ) reduces to @xmath268 since ( [ e - alt - conic - simple ] ) is linear in @xmath269 , its ground state given by @xmath270 with @xmath271 integer . if @xmath271 is odd , then eq.[e - alt - conic - simple ] breaks down , since eq.([eq : alpha - alt - conic ] ) is singular . what actually occurs here is that the sublattices have adopted an antiferromagnetic structure , decoupling the sublattices . because the sublattices are decoupled , @xmath27 is arbitrary ( representing the freedom the decoupled sublattices to rotate relative to each other ) . the energy for such a configuration is @xmath272 . conversely , if @xmath271 is even , then the ground state is a splayed state ( assuming that @xmath273 ) that means a commensurate , _ planar _ state ( using the @xmath274 plane , or collinear if @xmath263 is trivial ) . thus , with only primary couplings , even though the two sublattices are inequivalent , we _ can not _ obtain a non - coplanar spiral . when we turn on ( not too large ) secondary couplings , those commensurate states will remain stable out to the critical coupling , at which the optimal wavevector bifurcates . therefore we expand ( [ eq : e - alt - conic - psi ] ) in powers of @xmath275 about both kinds of stationary point @xcite to find : @xmath277 ^ 2}{j_2 - 4j_4 } + j_2'-j_4'-j_2-j_4 + \\ & \bigg(4\frac{j_1 - 3j_3}{j_2 - 4j_4 } j_3 + 2[\frac{j_1 - 3j_3}{j_2 - 4j_4}]^2 j_4- 2j_2'+8j_4'\bigg ) \delta^2 \end{split}\ ] ] [ eq : e - alt - conic - unstable ] @xmath279 } { j_2}j_3 + j_2'+4j_4 ' \\ & e_{\frac{\pi}{2 } } : 0 \ge & [ \frac{j_1 - 3j_3}{j_2 - 4j_4}]^2j_4 + 2\frac{j_1 - 3j_3 } { j_2 - 4j_4}j_3 -j_2'+4j_4 ' \end{aligned}\ ] ] a.yoshimori , j. phys . 14 , 807 ( 1959 ) ; j. villain , j. phys . solids 11 , 303 ( 1959 ) ; t. a. kaplan , phys . 116 , 888 ( 1959 ) . t. a. kaplan and n. menyuk , phil . mag . 87 , 3711 ( 2006 ) c. l. henley , phys . 62 , 2056 ( 1989 ) . e. f. shender , sov . jetp , 56 , 178 ( 1982 ) . c. l. henley and b. e. larson , preprint ( arxiv 2008 ) ; b. e. larson and c. l. henley , `` ground state selection in type iii fcc vector antiferromagnets '' ( unpublished preprint , 1990 ) . m. taillefumier , b. canals , c. lacroix , v. k. dugaev , and p. bruno , phys . rev . b 74 , 085105 ( 2006 ) n. nagaosa , j. sinova , s. onoda , a. h. macdonald , and n. p. ong , rev . 82 , 1539 ( 2010 ) c. l. henley , ann . ( n. y. ) 156 , 368 - 411 ( 1984 ) , s .- w . cheong and m. mostovoy , nature materials 8 , 13 ( 2007 ) . t. kimura , ann . 37 , 387 ( 2007 ) . t. kimura , j. c. lashley , and a. p. ramirez , phys . b 73 , 220401 ( 2006 ) d. khomskii , physics 2 , 20 ( 2009 ) . y. j. choi , j. okamoto , d. j. huang , et al . k. s. chao , h. j. lin , c. t. chen , m. van veenendaal , t. a. kaplan , and s. w. cheong phys . rev . lett . 102 , 067601 ( 2009 ) . r. moessner and j. t. chalker , phys . 80 , 2929 ( 1998 ) ; phys . b 58 , 12049 ( 1998 ) . s. t. chui , phys . b 15 , 307 ( 1977 ) . p. reed , j. phys . a 10 , 1745 ( 1977 ) . m. hermele , m. p. a. fisher , and l. balents , phys . rev . b 69 , 064404 ( 2004 ) . t. s. pickles , t. e. saunders , and j. t. chalker , epl 84 , 36002 ( 2008 ) . r. shankar , f. j. burnell , and s. l. sondhi , ann . 324 , 267 ( 2008 ) . h. takizawa , t. yamashita , k. uheda , and t. endo , j. phys . matter 14 , 11147 ( 2002 ) d. fruchart , e. f. bertaut , j. p. snateur , and r. fruchart , j. de physique lett . 38 , l-21 ( 1977 ) ; d. fruchart and e. f. bertaut , j. phys . 44 , 781 ( 1978 ) t. koyama , h. yamashita , y. takahashi , t. kohara , i. watanabe , y. tabata , and h. nakamura , phys . lett 101 , 126404 ( 2008 ) . v. h. tran , w. miller , and z. bukowski , phys . 100 , 137004 ( 2008 ) . t. nagamiya , `` helical spin ordering : 1 theory of helical spin configurations '' , in _ solid state physics _ vol . 20 , p. 306 f. seitz , d. turnbull , and h. ehrenreich ( academic press , new york and london 1967 ) . j. m. luttinger and l. tisza , phys . 70 , 954 ( 1946 ) . d. h. lyons and t. a. kaplan , phys . 120 , 1580 ( 1960 ) . j. samuel smart , _ effective field theories of magnetism _ ( w. b. saunders , philadelphia , 1966 ) ; see chapter 8 . d. bergman , j. alicea , e. gull , s. trebst , and l. balents , nature physics 3 , 487 ( 2007 ) . s. okumura , h. kawamura , t. okubo , y. motome , j. phys . 79 , 114705 ( 2010 ) ; a. mulder , r. ganesh , l. capriotti , and a. paramekanti , phys . rev . b 81 , 214419 ( 2010 ) . occasionally the end - to - end plot is illuminating even in higher dimensions , the sequence of spins being defined by a raster scan that goes down rows limited to one of the three sublattices running in one of the coordinate directions . ) for example , the double - twist state ( sec . [ sec : doubletwist ] ) was discovered from common - origin and end - to - end plots . e. rastelli , a. tassi , and l. reatto , physical b & c 97 , 1 ( 1979 ) ; e. rastelli and a. tassi , j. phys . c : 19 , l423 ( 1986 ) . j. n. reimers , a. j. berlinsky , and a. c. shi , phys . rev . b 43 , 865 ( 1991 ) . d. h. lyons and t. a. kaplan , j. phys . solids , 25 , 645 ( 1964 ) . schmidt and m. luban , j. phys . a 36 , 6351 ( 2003 ) ; j .- c . domenge , p. sindzingre , c. lhuillier , and l. pierre , phys . b 72 , 024433 ( 2005 ) . j .- domenge , c. lhuillier , l. messio , l. pierre , and p. viot , phys . rev . b 77 , 172413 ( 2008 ) . spin configurations on a cuboctahedron were studied by : j. schulenberg , a. honecker , j. schnack , j. richter , and h .- j . schmidt , phys . 88 , 167207 ( 2002 ) . we did not include the asymmetric conic state in table [ tab : o - states ] since we will see that it is only found on the phase boundary between two other states . for the octahedral lattice , then , it appears only as a randomly chosen member of a family of highly degenerate states ( using the classification of sec . [ sec : bridging ] ) , rather than a genuine ground state . due to the complexity of the double - twist state , the phase boundaries of the double - twist state shown in figure [ fig : o,-1,1/3 ] were _ not _ generated by variationally optimizing a parametrized hamiltonian and finding absolute minima . instead , we show the phase boundary from the `` luttinger - tisza phase diagram '' , i.e. the boundary of the region of parameter space in which @xmath237 was the optimal wave - vector . as argued in sec . [ sec : lt ] , that will produce a phase diagram topologically similar to the true phase diagram . around the tricritical - type points where the transition switches from first - order to degenerate , there are alternating conic states only slightly higher in energy than the helimagnetic states , so that a sliver of alternating conic may be spuriously identified here if numerical results are not checked analytically . l. messio , c. lhuillier , and g. misguich , phys . rev . b 83 , 184401 ( 2011 ) . m. matsuda , j .- h . chung , s. park , t. j. sato , k. matsuno , h. aruga - katori , h. takagi , k. kakurai , k. kamazawa , y. tsunoda , i. kagomiya , c. l. henley , and s .- h . lee , europhys . 82 , 37006 ( 2008 ) . d. tsuneishi , m. ioki , and h. kawamura , j. phys . condens . matter 19 , 145273 ( 2007 ) . t. nakamura and d. hirashima , j. mag . mag . materials 310 , 1297 ( 2007 ) . chern , r. moessner , and o. tchernyshyov phys . rev . b 78 , 144418 ( 2008 ) . `` ordering of the pyrochlore ising model with the long - range rkky interaction '' a. ikeda and h. kawamura j. phys . 77 , 073707 ( 2008 ) . Abstract:

Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.

Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered . Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video . Paper: a carousel is an automated storage and retrieval system , widely used in modern warehouses . it consists of a number of shelves or drawers , which are linked together and are rotating in a closed loop . it is operated by a picker ( human or robotic ) that has a fixed position in front of the carousel . a typical vertical carousel is given in figure [ fig : carousel ] . carousels are widely used for storage and retrieval of small and medium - sized items , such as health and beauty products , repair parts of boilers for space heating , parts of vacuum cleaners and sewing machines , books , shoes and many other goods . in e - commerce companies use carousel to store small items and manage small individual orders . an order is defined as a set of items that must be picked together ( for instance , for a single customer ) . carousels are highly versatile , and come in a huge variety of configurations , sizes , and types . they can be horizontal or vertical and rotate in either one or both directions . although both unidirectional ( one - way rotating ) or bidirectional ( two - way rotating ) carousels are encountered in practice , the bidirectional types are the most common ( as well as being the most efficient ) @xcite . one of the main advantages of carousels is that , rather than having the picker travel to an item ( as is the case in a warehouse where items are stored on shelves ) , the carousel rotates the items to the picker . while the carousel is travelling , the picker has the time to perform other tasks , such as pack or label the retrieved items , or serve another carousel . this practice enhances the operational efficiency of the warehouse . carousel models have received much attention in the literature and continue to pose interesting problems . there is a rich literature on carousels that dates back to 1980 @xcite . in section [ s : literature ] we shall review some of the main research topics that have been of interest to the research community so far . to name a few , one may wish to study various ways of storing the items on a carousel ( storage arrangements ) so as to minimise the total time needed until an order is completed ( response time ) or the strategy that should be followed in rotating the carousel so as the total time the carousel travels between items of one order is minimised ( travel time for a single order ) . one may also consider design issues , for instance , the problem of pre - positioning the carousel in anticipation of storage or retrieval requests ( choosing a _ dwell point _ ) in order to improve the average response time of the system . the list of references presented here is by no means exhaustive ; it rather serves the purpose of indicating the continuing interest in carousels . in this review paper we focus on the modelling and the performance of carousel systems . usually a carousel is modelled as a circle , either as a discrete model @xcite , where the circle consists of a fixed number of locations , or as a continuous one @xcite , where the circle has unit length and the locations of the required items are represented as arbitrary points on the circle . throughout this paper we shall view the carousel as a continuous loop of unit length . beyond this initial assumption , we shall examine modelling issues such as how to model travel times or picking times of items in a system of several carousels so as to be able to derive approximations of various performance characteristics . under `` performance '' one may understand a variety of notions . for example , in single - carousel single - order problems ( cf.section [ s : nelly ] ) , the performance measure under consideration is the travel time of the carousel until all items in an order are picked . on the other hand , in section [ s : maria ] , performance may be measured by the time the picker is idle between picking items from various carousels , i.e.by the picker s utilisation . in this paper we consider two research topics in detail . in section [ s : nelly ] , we discuss the problem of choosing a reasonable picking strategy for one order and a single carousel , where the order is represented as a list of items , and by order pick strategy we mean an algorithm that prescribes in which sequence the items are to be retrieved . we present a general probabilistic approach developed by litvak _ et al_. @xcite to analytically derive the probability distribution of the travel time in case when items locations are independent and uniformly distributed . this line of research seems to be the only example in the literature where exact statistical characteristics of the travel time have been obtained by means of a systematic mathematical approach . the presented technique is based on properties of uniform spacings and their relations to exponential distributions . we demonstrate the effectiveness of this method by considering several relevant order - picking strategies , such as the greedy nearest - item strategies and so - called @xmath2-step strategies that provide a good approximation for the optimal ( shortest ) route . in section [ s : maria ] we consider the second topic that relates to multiple - carousel settings and the modelling challenges that appear in such problems . having optimised the travel time of a single carousel for a single order , one wonders if optimising locally every time each order on each carousel leads to the best solution ( fastest , cheapest , or with the largest picker utilisation ) for a complicated system . as is mentioned later on , multiple - carousel problems become too complicated too quickly , and often exact analysis is not possible . therefore , we discuss which concessions have to be made in order to be able to obtain estimates of the performance measures we are interested in , and we give in detail the impact that these concessions have on our estimations . there exist a few exact results for two - carousel models and related models in healthcare logistics ; see boxma and vlasiou @xcite and vlasiou _ et al . _ @xcite@xcite . however , to the best of our knowledge , no exact results exist for systems involving more than two carousels . preferably , these two research topics that we consider in this paper should be studied in parallel . however , establishing any exact results , say on determining the optimal retrieval and travelling strategy for a multiple - carousel model , without any restrictions to the sequence the items in an order are picked or the sequence the carousels are served , seems to be intractable . nonetheless , quite a few research opportunities related to the optimal design and control of carousel systems are still available . we elaborate on further research topics in section [ s : research ] . we conclude with section [ s : literature ] , which outlines the problems examined so far on carousels and related storage and retrieval systems . performance analysis of single units is a necessary step in structural design of order pick systems @xcite . in a setting of a single order on a single carousel , the major performance characteristic is the response time , that is , the total time it takes to retrieve an order . the response time consists of pick times needed to collect the items from their locations by an operator , and the travel ( rotation ) time of the carousel . while pick times can hardly be improved , the travel time depends on the location of each item and the order picking sequence , and thus , it is subject to analysis and optimisation . therefore , in this section , we discuss properties of the travel time needed to collect an order of @xmath3 items . in this section , our focus is on the case when the item locations are randomly distributed on a carousel circumference . this model allows one to compute statistical characteristics of the travel time such as the average travel time or the travel time distribution . later on , in section [ ss : picking a single order ] we discuss some results from the literature on evaluating the travel times under different assumptions on the items locations , in particular , the case when the pick positions are fixed . we note that in case of a single carousel , it is natural to assume that the pick times and the travel time are independent . the situation , however , is quite different in the systems of two or more carousels , where pick times on one carousel affect the travel times on other carousels . this issue will be discussed in detail in section [ s : maria ] . the model addressed in this section is as follows . we model a carousel as a circle of length 1 . the order is represented by the list of @xmath3 items whose positions are independent and uniformly distributed on @xmath4 . for ease of presentation , we act as if the picker travels to the pick positions instead of the other way around . also , we assume that the acceleration / deceleration time of the carousel is negligible or that it is assigned to the pick time , and that the carousel rotates at unit speed . therefore the travel distance can be identified with the travel time ( see also section [ ss : design issues ] ) . obviously , the travel time depends heavily on the pick strategy . here by order pick strategy _ we mean an algorithm that prescribes the sequence in which the items are collected . for example , assume that the picker always proceeds in the clockwise ( cw ) direction and denote by @xmath5 the time needed to collect @xmath3 items under this simple strategy . then , clearly , the distribution function @xmath6 of @xmath5 simply equals @xmath7 , @xmath8 . however , we would like to study strategies that provide smaller travel times . in this sense , a better algorithm that one can think of is the ` greedy ' strategy , also called the _ nearest - item heuristic _ : always travel to the nearest item to be picked ( as in figure [ fig_ni_route ] ) . , width=144 ] the nearest - item strategy indeed performs very well and is often used in practice , but the question is : `` what is the distribution of the travel time under the nearest - item heuristic ? '' . this problem is not at all trivial . for example , straightforward methods , such as conditioning on possible item locations , do not lead to feasible calculations . the same applies to the optimal strategy . bartholdi and platzman @xcite showed that the shortest route admits at most one turn . intuitively , this follows merely by observing figure [ fig_ni_route ] , where the displayed route can be shortened by collecting the first item in the counterclockwise direction and then collecting the rest of the items rotating clockwise . thus , the shortest route is merely the minimum among the @xmath9 candidate routes than have at most one turn . however , in spite of this simple structure of the shortest route , its distribution function is hard to derive . below we discuss in detail a general methodology developed by litvak _ et al . _ @xcite to obtain the distribution of the travel time under various order pick strategies . the proposed technique is based on properties of uniform spacings and their connection with exponential random variables . we show how this approach allows us to derive exact and often counterintuitive results on several relevant order pick strategies . some other methods from the literature are described in section [ ss : picking a single order ] . we start with introducing the notation and presenting some background results . let the random variable @xmath10 be the picker s starting point and the random variable @xmath11 , where @xmath12 , be the position of the @xmath13th item . we suppose that the @xmath11 s , @xmath14 , are independent and uniformly distributed on @xmath4 . let @xmath15 denote the order statistics of @xmath16 and set @xmath17 , @xmath18 . then the uniform spacings are defined as @xmath19 if we consider @xmath3 items randomly located on a circle , then the spacings @xmath20 are the distances between two neighbouring items , and the spacings @xmath21 and @xmath22 are the distances between the starting point and the two items adjacent to it . whatever strategy the picker takes , he always has to cover one or more uniform spacings on his way from one location to another . hence , in general , the travel time can be expressed as a function of the uniform spacings . uniform spacings have been analysed extensively in two classical review papers by pyke @xcite . the author gives four useful constructions that establish a connection between uniform spacings and exponential random variables . we will use such a connection in the following form . let @xmath23 , @xmath24 be independent exponential random variables with mean 1 . moreover , define the random variables @xmath25 then , according to pyke @xcite , uniform spacings can be represented as follows : @xmath26 here and throughout this paper @xmath27 means that @xmath28 and @xmath29 have the same probability distribution . linear combinations of uniform spacing have nice properties . in particular , the moments of linear combinations with non - negative coefficients can be easily computed , and their distribution function has been derived by ali @xcite , ali and obaidullah @xcite . now , let @xmath30 and @xmath31 be independent exponential random variables with parameters @xmath32 and @xmath33 , respectively . we write @xmath34 , @xmath35 , where @xmath23 and @xmath36 are independent exponential random variables with parameter 1 . then , given the event @xmath37 $ ] , we obtain the following useful statements : ( i ) the distribution of @xmath38 is exponential with parameter @xmath39 ( property of the minimum of two exponentials ) , which is distributed as @xmath40 ; ( ii ) since @xmath41 $ ] , then , according to the memoryless property , @xmath31 can be written as a sum of two terms : @xmath42 and another independent exponential with parameter @xmath33 , so @xmath31 is distributed as @xmath43 . ( iii ) it is easy to check that the distribution of @xmath44 is independent of the event @xmath37 $ ] because according to ( i ) and ( ii ) , given @xmath37 $ ] , @xmath45 is again distributed as @xmath46 ( see also chapter 2 of @xcite ) . based on the above - mentioned properties of exponential random variables , and their connections to uniform spacings and travel times , one may adopt the following methodology for analysing the travel times under various strategies @xcite : 1 . express the travel time under a given strategy as a function of uniform spacings . 2 . by conditioning on linear inequalities between the spacings and employing the above mentioned properties of exponential random variables , rewrite the travel time as a linear combination of uniform spacings or as a probabilistic mixture of such linear combinations . 3 . use the results from @xcite to obtain the moments and the distribution of the travel time . below we show how this approach works in case of the nearest - item heuristic @xcite and so - called @xmath2-step strategies @xcite . under the nearest - item heuristic , the picker always moves towards the nearest item to be retrieved . the positions of the items partition the circle in @xmath47 uniform spacings @xmath48 defined by . under the nearest - item heuristic , the picker first considers the two spacings adjacent to his starting position and then travels to the nearest item . next he also looks at the other spacing adjacent to that item and compares the distance to the item located at the endpoint of that spacing and the distance to the first item in the other direction , which is the sum of the spacings previously considered . then he travels again to the nearest item , and so on . furthermore , by employing , we may act as if the picker faces non - normalised exponential spacings , and afterwards divide the travel time ( which is equal to the travel distance ) by the sum of all spacings . then it is clear that each new spacing faced by the picker is independent of the ones already observed . now let @xmath49 , @xmath50 , denote the @xmath13-th non - normalised exponential spacing faced by the picker . that is , the spacings are numbered as observed by the picker operating under the nearest - item heuristic ( see figure [ fig_travel ] ) . , width=340 ] then @xmath51 can be expressed as @xmath52 we first provide an informal explanation of how the proposed methodology can be applied to . to start with , note that first term in the right - hand side of is @xmath53 , which is distributed simply as @xmath54 . moreover , under the event @xmath55 $ ] the rest of the sum remains unaltered . further , consider the term @xmath56 let @xmath57 , @xmath58 , @xmath59 be auxiliary independent exponential random variables with mean 1 . given @xmath60 $ ] , the random variable @xmath61 is distributed as @xmath62 , @xmath23 is distributed as @xmath63 and @xmath64 is distributed as @xmath59 . then the term in is distributed as @xmath65 . furthermore , given the event @xmath66 $ ] , we obtain that @xmath23 is distributed as @xmath62 , @xmath61 is distributed as @xmath67 and @xmath64 is distributed as @xmath68 . substituting the above in , we obtain again @xmath65 ! remarkably , under the event @xmath69 $ ] , again transforms into @xmath65 . furthermore , the sum @xmath70 becomes simply @xmath71 . we may now rename @xmath72 back to @xmath73 since the two 3-dimensional vectors are identically distributed . then the term becomes @xmath74 , and the rest of the terms in the right - hand side of remain unaltered in all three cases . proceeding further , we obtain the next statement which is proved rigorously in @xcite . [ litvak and adan @xcite ] [ th_nearest_item ] for all @xmath75 , @xmath76 and @xmath77 where @xmath78 if @xmath79 and @xmath80 otherwise . here follows directly from and the result by ali @xcite , which we applied in the form given by theorem 2 in @xcite . the above theorem is surprising because it provides an elegant solution for a problem that looks intractable at first . an interesting by - product is the distribution of the number of turns under the nearest - item heuristics and the counterintuitive result that _ the travel time and the number of turns are independent _ @xcite ! the latter can be seen directly from . indeed , a turn after step @xmath13 is equivalent to the event @xmath81 $ ] . however , as we saw earlier , the form of the distribution of the travel time is given by and it is independent of this sort of events . under the @xmath2-step strategies , the picker chooses the shortest route among the @xmath82 routes that change direction at most once , and only do so after collecting no more than @xmath2 items . note that the optimal strategy is in fact an @xmath83-step strategy since it is never optimal to turn more than once , and the maximal possible number of items collected before a turn is @xmath84 . the @xmath2-step strategies give a good approximation for the shortest travel time . in fact , they often provide the optimal route even for moderate values of @xmath2 , as in figure [ fig : m - step ] . et al . _ @xcite were the first to propose these strategies as an upper bound for the optimal route . in case of independent uniformly distributed pick positions , they obtained the distribution of the travel time under the @xmath2-step strategy for @xmath85 using analytical methods . later on , litvak and adan @xcite applied the described methodology based on the properties of uniform spacings to completely analyse the travel time under the @xmath2-step strategies , provided @xmath86 . the travel under the @xmath2-step strategy can be expressed as follows @xmath87 indeed , the term @xmath88 is the gain in travel time ( compared to one full rotation ) obtained by skipping the spacing @xmath89 and going back instead , ending in a clockwise direction . on the other hand , @xmath90 is the gain obtained by skipping the spacing @xmath91 and going back ending counterclockwise . under the @xmath2-step strategy the picker skips the spacing that provides the largest possible gain ( see figure [ fig : m - step ] ) . -step strategy.[fig : m - step],width=340 ] using property , and after appropriate manipulations of exponential random variables , one can prove the following result . [ th_m - step ] for any @xmath92 , with @xmath86 , @xmath93 the maximum in the right - hand side of implies that @xmath94 is distributed as a complicated probabilistic mixture of linear combinations of uniform spacings @xcite . the number of terms in this mixture is the well - known catalan number @xmath95 which grows extremely fast with @xmath2 . computing the expectations , we conclude that on average , the @xmath2-step strategy performs better than the nearest - item heuristic already for @xmath96 provided @xmath97 . again , as a by - product , we can obtain the distribution of the number of steps before the turn . moreover , the latter random variable turns out to be independent of the travel time . this surprising statement follows from a similar reasoning as the independence of the travel time and the number of turns under the nearest - item heuristic . furthermore , when @xmath3 goes to infinity , the number of steps before the turn converges to a shifted geometric distribution with parameter @xmath98 . that is , in the limit , with probability @xmath98 there will be no turn , with probability @xmath99 there will be one step before a turn , etc . also , in the limit , the @xmath2-step strategy with @xmath86 coincides with the optimal strategy since the probability of achieving the minimal travel time by making more than @xmath100 steps before a turn will converge to zero . thus , for large enough @xmath3 , the probability that a 2-step strategy provides an optimal route is about @xmath101 . this explains the remarkably good performance of the @xmath2-step strategies . as a side remark , we would like to note that @xcite provides slightly more general results than those presented in and . since the optimal strategy simply coincides with the @xmath83-step strategy ( at most one turn after collecting at most @xmath84 items ) it can be analysed by methods from section [ ss : m - step ] . however , the condition @xmath86 is violated for @xmath102 , and hence , does not hold . in fact , the proposed methodology applied to the optimal travel time @xmath103 very soon results in analytically infeasible calculations . litvak and van zwet @xcite analysed the optimal route . they employed the results on the @xmath2-step strategy to derive a recursive expression for the distribution of the minimal travel time . we would like to also note that the process of comparing the lengths of the spacings and deriving corresponding linear combinations of normalised exponentials can be easily translated into a computer program . then , for moderate values of @xmath3 the exact distribution of the optimal travel time can be obtained numerically . the result will be a complicated mixture of linear combinations of uniform spacings . for large values of @xmath3 such exact calculations will require too much computer capacity . however , in this case , the knowledge of the exact distribution is not very important since one can apply approximations based on asymptotic results discussed in the next section . when the order is large , we can model this situation by letting @xmath104 . then the expressions in and for the travel time allow us to obtain asymptotic results that are of independent mathematical interest . obviously , if @xmath104 then the travel time under any strategy goes to one with probability 1 . however , with linear scaling , we obtain non - trivial distributions that we present below for the nearest - item heuristic and for the optimal travel time . [ theorem2 ] let @xmath23 , @xmath64 , @xmath105,@xmath57 , @xmath58 , @xmath105 , be independent exponentials with mean 1 . then @xmath106 as @xmath104 . result is also generalised to the case when items positions are independent and have some positive density @xmath107 @xcite . the expression in the right - hand side of is a well - known functional of the poisson process , which has been extensively studied in the literature . we will briefly discuss this topic in section [ ss : exponential_functionals ] . the problems examined so far relate to one - carousel models . in industry though , one rarely meets a facility where only one carousel is used . multiple - carousel systems tend to have a higher level of throughput ; however , they increase the investment cost due to the extra driving and control mechanisms @xcite . a natural question is how much the throughput of a standard carousel can be improved by the corresponding multiple - carousel system that has the same number of shelves as the standard carousel . thus , the question we would like to examine in this section is the following : given a setup , i.e.a specific storage scheme of the items stored on the carousel _ and _ a specific travelling strategy , such as those described in the previous section , how much can we increase the utilisation of the picker ( by assigning to him more carousels to handle ) without increasing the response time of an order above some chosen level ? in other words , how do we reach a _ quality and efficiency _ regime in a real situation ? to illustrate things better , consider the following simple example . a facility assigns @xmath3 carousels to a single picker . each carousel is assigned to an order of a single customer , and each order consists of exactly one item . moreover , each carousel rotates independently until the desired item reaches the picker , who is standing at a fixed point , the origin . once this position is reached , the carousel stops until the item is picked . only then will the next order be given to the carousel , which will start rotating the new order to the origin . the picker serves the carousels in a fixed order , visiting each carousel only once in every cycle . clearly , as @xmath3 goes to infinity , the utilisation of the picker in steady state tends to one , since almost surely he will never have to wait . the carousels will have brought each of their respective items to the origin by the time the picker is ready to serve them . on the other hand , the time until the picker returns to the first carousel tends to infinity ; i.e. each individual customer suffers long waiting times . multiple carousel problems differ intrinsically from single - carousel problems in a number of ways . such systems tend to be more complicated . the system can not be viewed as a number of independently operating carousels ( cf . @xcite and section [ ss : design issues ] ) , since there may be some interaction between two separate carousels by means of the picker that is assigned to them . namely , if the number of pickers is less than the number of carousels , then the picking strategy that is chosen for an isolated carousel may affect significantly the waiting time of another carousel . thus , one can not guarantee that minimising the travel time of a single carousel maximises the total throughput of the system ; the outcome may be quite the contrary because of the system s interdependency . another point is that in multiple - carousel problems , the i.i.d . assumption of the time needed to pick each of two consecutive orders with random item storage is in principle invalid . characteristics such as the time needed to reach the optimal point or the travel time for each carousel depend on one another through the picker s movements . for all these reasons , multiple - carousel systems merit a special reference . ideally , the problems of minimising the travel time of all carousels and maximising the picker s utilisation without surpassing certain levels of each order s response time should be studied together . however , the interdependence that appears in multiple carousel problems usually leads to complicated mathematical structures that can hardly be analysed exactly . one will have to resort to simplifications . one technique that can help overcome some of these difficulties is the setting proposed in vlasiou _ et al . _ the system we consider below consists of two carousels operated by a single picker . given a setting , i.e. a storage scheme and a travel strategy , one first needs to obtain an estimate of the travel time needed in order to collect all items under this setting . for example , if the items are stored in random positions on the carousel , then the distribution of the travel time under the nearest - item heuristic is given by . in most settings though , this distribution can not be computed analytically , in which cases the empirical distribution or simulation may provide a partial answer . subsequently , one may need to approximate this distribution by a phase - type distribution ; see e.g. @xcite . then , the following modelling assumption is made . we aggregate all items in one . that is , we consider an order that consists of exactly one item . it is assumed that the travel time of the carousel until that single item is reached is uniformly distributed ( i.e. it is assumed that the item is located randomly on the carousel ) , while the distribution of the pick time for that item is taken to be equal to the phase - type distribution computed previously . under these assumptions , one can compute the utilisation of the picker by applying the results developed in vlasiou _ et al . _ this procedure can be repeated until the desired quality and efficiency regime is reached . to describe things concretely , we consider a system consisting of two identical carousels and one picker . at each carousel there is an infinite supply of pick orders that need to be processed . the picker alternates between the two carousels , picking one order at a time . there are two ways one can view this . either , as mentioned above , one aggregates all items in an order in one super - item ( i.e. we consider an order that consists of exactly one item ) or under the term `` picking time '' we understand the total time needed for the actual picking and travelling from the moment the picker is about to pick the first item in an order until the time the last item is picked . for ease of presentation , we will opt for the first solution , considering orders consisting of exactly one item . as in section [ s : nelly ] , we model a carousel as a circle of length @xmath108 and we assume that it rotates in one direction at a constant speed . the picking process may be visualised as follows . when the picker is about to pick an item at one of the carousels , he may have to wait until the item is rotated in front of him . in the meantime , the other carousel rotates towards the position of the next item . after completion of the first pick the carousel is instantaneously replenished and the picker turns to the other carousel , where he may have to wait again , and so on . let the random variables @xmath109 , @xmath110 and @xmath111 , @xmath112 , denote the pick time , rotation time and waiting time for the @xmath3-th item . clearly , the waiting times @xmath111 satisfy the recursion @xmath113 where @xmath114 . we assume that both @xmath115 and @xmath116 , @xmath112 , are sequences of independent identically distributed random variables , also independent of each other . the pick times @xmath109 follow a phase - type distribution and the rotation times @xmath110 are uniformly distributed on @xmath4 ( which means that the items are randomly located on the carousels ) . then @xmath117 is a markov chain , with state space @xmath4 . moreover , it can be shown that @xmath117 is an aperiodic , recurrent harris chain , which possesses a unique equilibrium distribution . in equilibrium , equation becomes @xmath118 once the distribution of @xmath119 is computed from , we can compute @xmath120 $ ] and thus also the throughput of the system @xmath121 from @xmath122+{\mathbb{e}}[a]}.\ ] ] equation with a plus sign instead of minus sign in front of @xmath119 at the right - hand side , is precisely lindley s equation for the stationary waiting time in a ph / u/1 queue . the equation for the standard ph / u/1 queue has no simple solution , but in vlasiou _ et al_. @xcite we show that the waiting time of the picker in our problem can be solved for explicitly . for example , assume that the service times follow an erlang distribution with scale parameter @xmath32 and @xmath3 stages ; that is , @xmath123 and define @xmath124 $ ] . then , for the laplace transform @xmath125 of @xmath119 , i.e.@xmath126 where @xmath127 is the density of @xmath119 , the following theorem holds ( recall that the domain of integration is bounded by the length of the carousel ) . [ 3th : erlang / u ] for all @xmath128 , the transform @xmath125 satisfies @xmath129 where @xmath130 in we still need to determine the @xmath47 unknowns @xmath131 and @xmath132 for @xmath133 . note that for any zero of the polynomial @xmath134 , the left - hand side of vanishes ( since @xmath135 is analytic everywhere ) . this implies that the right - hand side should also vanish . hence , the zeros of @xmath134 provide the equations necessary to determine the unknowns . in @xcite it is explained how to determine these unknown parameters ( which incidentally form the unique solution to a linear system of equations ) and how to invert the transform . qualitatively , the result is as follows . [ 3th : densityold ] the density of @xmath119 on @xmath136 $ ] is given by @xmath137 and @xmath138 = 1-\sum_{i=1}^{2n+2 } \frac{c_i}{r_i}(\mathrm{e}^{r_i}-1),\ ] ] where @xmath139 is a zero of the polynomial @xmath134 appearing in theorem [ 3eq : erl_polywn ] , and where the coefficients @xmath140 are known explicitly . as a by - product , we have that [ 3cor : tau ] the throughput @xmath121 satisfies @xmath141 + { \mathbb{e}}[w ] = \frac{n}{\lambda } + { \sum\limits}_{i=1}^{2n+2 } \frac{c_i}{r^2_i } [ 1 + ( r_i -1)\mathrm{e}^{r_i } ] .\ ] ] the same qualitative result holds in case the pick times follow a mixed - erlang distribution . in this case , the waiting time density is again a mixture of exponentials , where all parameters can be computed explicitly ; cf . @xcite . in a series of papers , et al_. @xcite have relaxed several of the assumptions made above for the two - carousel setting . for example , the travel time needed to pick all items in an order can have any general distribution ( e.g. depending on the pick strategy that is followed ) . in such cases , one can compute the distribution of the waiting time of the picker by approximating the distribution of the travel time by an appropriate phase - type distribution . phase - type distributions may be used to approximate any given distribution on @xmath4 for the travel times arbitrarily close ; see for example asmussen @xcite . as an illustrative example , we give below the steady - state distribution of the waiting time of the picker in case the pick times follow some general distribution with laplace - stieltjes transform ( lst ) @xmath142 , and the travel times follow an erlang distribution with parameter @xmath33 and @xmath3 stages . here , @xmath135 denotes the ( unknown ) lst of the waiting time of the picker . in this case we have the following : [ 4th : density ] the waiting - time distribution has a mass @xmath131 at the origin , which is given by @xmath143=1-\sum_{i=0}^{n-1}\frac{(-\mu)^i}{i!}\,\phi^{(i)}(\mu)\ ] ] and has a density @xmath144 on @xmath145 that is given by @xmath146 in the above expression , we have that @xmath147 and that the parameters @xmath148 for @xmath149 are the unique solution to the system of equations @xmath150 as a final curiosity , we present figure [ fig : throughput ] . for single - server queuing models it is well - known that the mean waiting time depends ( approximately linearly ) on the squared coefficients of variation of the interarrival ( and service ) times ; see also section [ sss : lindley ] for connections of this model to the classical single - server queue . the results in figure [ fig : throughput ] , however , show that for this two - carousel model , the throughput @xmath121 , and thus the mean waiting time , is not very sensitive to the squared coefficient of variation of the pick time ; it indeed decreases as @xmath151 increases , but very slowly . this phenomenon may be explained by the fact that the waiting time of the server is bounded by one , that is , the time needed for a full rotation of the carousel . we refrain from giving all results derived for the waiting time distribution in this setting , as they can be found in the papers mentioned so far . one point needs to be stressed though . this technique makes usage of several simplifications ( e.g. aggregating orders in one item ) and approximations ( e.g. modelling various distributions as a phase - type distribution ) . some of them are almost unavoidable . for example , a carousel storing items in separate drawers should be evidently modelled with a discrete travel - time distribution ; for the application of these results though , one should approximate this distribution by a ( continuous ) phase - type distribution . however , the effect that some of these assumptions have to the final result is marginal , or at least fully controlled . as was shown in vlasiou and adan @xcite , the error made in computing the distribution of the time the picker has to wait ( is not utilised ) is bounded . error bounds have been studied widely . the main question is to define an upper bound of the distance between the distribution in question and its approximation , that depends on the distance between the governing distributions . for our model , recall that @xmath152 , @xmath153 , and @xmath119 denote respectively the pick time needed for an item , the travel time of the carousel until this item is reached , and the waiting time of the picker until the carousel stops for the pick . moreover , @xmath154 represents the distribution of @xmath153 ( and similarly also for @xmath119 ) and @xmath155 is its approximation ( such as the phase - type approximation mentioned above ) . using this approximation , @xmath155 , one can derive analytically an exact solution that is obtained for this case for the distribution of @xmath119 . denote this solution by @xmath156 . then the following error bound holds . [ 6th : error bound ] let @xmath157 . then @xmath158)$ ] . in the theorem above , the norm under consideration is the uniform norm . the main ingredient of the proof relies on the fact that the density for the stationary waiting time of can be described in terms of an integral equation that is a contraction mapping . as a result , approximation errors can be bounded . an almost identical result can be derived in case one approximates the pick time , rather than the travel time . thus , as this theorem indicates , resorting to approximations yields results of validity that can be controlled , provided that one has an estimation of the error that is being made by the original approximation . other results derived for the two - carousel setting include the study of the conditions under which there exists a steady - state distribution @xcite , the study of the tail behaviour of this distribution under general assumptions for the pick and travel times @xcite , the derivation of the steady - state distribution for various cases for the distributions of the pick and travel times @xcite , as well as the time - dependent distribution of the waiting times of the picker for a specific setting for the distributions of the pick and travel times @xcite . moreover , certain types of dependencies between the pick and travel times have also been studied , and the steady - state distribution has been derived for these cases as well @xcite . it is worth a mention that such multiple - carousel systems , their mathematical peculiarities , their results and the way those are derived are not limited only to carousel , warehousing , or manufacturing problems . the same equation describing the dynamics of a two - carousel setting describes also the dynamics of a queuing model with two nodes that is applied to situations varying from a university canteen to a surgeon s operating room . for a description of such systems and detailed analysis see vlasiou _ et al . _ @xcite . what we have discussed so far on multiple - carousel problems is summarised as follows . multiple - carousel problems are intrinsically different from their single - carousel counterparts . what is of interest in such problems is to strike a balance between the utilisation of the picker and the response time of an order . to date , not much is known about such systems ; see section [ ss : problems involving multiple carousels ] for an exhaustive literature review . a few of these results are simulation studies . however , it is almost inevitable to make use of some simulation or approximations in these problems . the results developed in vlasiou _ et al . _ @xcite help predict the performance of two - carousel systems and ultimately , combined with the results on e.g nearest - item heuristic or @xmath2-step strategies discussed in section [ s : nelly ] , they help design a facility having a specific quality and efficiency target . however , such results are still far from accurate . more research is needed on the subject ; specific directions are provided in the next section . the mathematics and models involved in the research regarding carousel systems have surprisingly many connections to broader areas in queuing theory and applied probability . other than the relation to polling systems which will be explained in detail in section [ polling systems ] , the subjects we have presented so far are connected to the classical single - server queue , to rendezvous networks and layered queues and even to graph theory . in the following , we highlight few of these connections . the uniform spacings defined in constitute a classical mathematical construction which is very well studied . uniform spacings have been analysed extensively in two classical review papers by pyke @xcite . in particular , @xcite discusses the connections between uniform spacings and exponential random variables that are a main concept in the methodology presented in section [ s : nelly ] . the markovian property ( which is also called the memoryless property ) of the exponential distribution is systematically exploited in operations research and in particular in queuing theory @xcite . uniform spacings play an important role in mathematical statistics . mainly , they are used for goodness - of - fit tests which examine how well a sample of data agrees with a given distribution @xmath159 as its population . the idea of using uniform spacings is based on the integral transformation @xmath160 which reduces the problem to the testing of uniformity of the transformed sample . there is a vast literature on the distributions , limiting behaviour , approximations and bounds for various goodness - of - fit test statistics and empirical processes based on uniform spacings . these investigations are of great mathematical and practical interest . considerable progress in the area has been achieved in the eighties , but there are still many open problems motivating new studies . in his detailed review , pyke @xcite distinguishes two main types of goodness - of - fit statistics based on a function of uniform spacings , namely a sum of the form @xmath161 or a function of the ordered spacings and their ranks . the analysis of the first kind of tests goes back to le cam @xcite and gives rise to an extensive literature , see e.g. @xcite and references therein . recent progress on multivariate spacings has been reported in @xcite . the second type of tests requires the knowledge of the properties of ordered spacings . this subject has been extensively studied ; we refer the interested reader to the work by deheuvels @xcite and devroye @xcite . an original discrete version of the problem is analysed by henze @xcite who derives the distribution of the maximal and minimal spacings in lottery tickets . apart from the tests mentioned above , there are also tests based on @xmath2-spacings which are the gaps between the order statistics @xmath162 and @xmath163 . for the analysis of such test statistics and their asymptotic properties as the number of observations goes to infinity , see , e.g. , del pino @xcite , hall @xcite , and references therein . the tests based on ordered @xmath2-spacings have been also analysed , see , e.g. , @xcite . more references on this subject and results on the approximations for @xmath2-spacings can be found in @xcite . for further analysis and applications of various empirical processes based on spacings see pyke @xcite , beirlant et al . @xcite , einmahl and van zuijlen @xcite and references therein . let @xmath164 be i.i.d . exponential random variables with mean 1 . for any @xmath165 , define @xmath166 @xmath167 note that the right - hand side of is exactly @xmath168 with @xmath169 . likewise , the right - hand side of is the minimum of two independent random variables distributed as @xmath170 . we see that the sums of independent exponentials with exponentially decreasing coefficients play an important role in the limiting results for the travel time in carousel systems as the number of items goes to infinity . specifically , these random variables appear if we consider the difference between the travel time and one complete carousel rotation , and then scale this quantity linearly with the number of items . now let @xmath171 be a standard poisson process . then we can write @xmath168 as an exponential functional associated with @xmath171 : @xmath172 the functional @xmath168 has been intensively studied in the literature . its density was obtained independently in @xcite , and in @xcite for @xmath169 . carmona _ et al . _ @xcite derived a density of @xmath173 for a large class of functions @xmath174 , in particular , for @xmath175 . bertoin and yor @xcite found the fractional moments of @xmath168 . if @xmath176 is a density of @xmath168 , then @xmath176 and all its derivatives equal 0 at point @xmath177 . this implies that all moments of @xmath178 are finite . however , for @xmath179 , it was proved in @xcite that @xmath180 is not determined by its moments . et al . _ @xcite found the distribution and the fractional moments of the exponential functional @xmath181 where @xmath182 is a compound poisson process . the distribution function of @xmath168 and @xmath183 has an interesting asymptotic behaviour in the neighbourhood of zero . bertoin and yor @xcite obtained the following logarithmic asymptotics : @xmath184 where @xmath185 is a density of @xmath186 the exact asymptotic behaviour has been derived by litvak and van zwet @xcite . compared to the logarithmic asymptotics , their formula contains several additional terms and reveals an unexpected oscillating behaviour involving theta - functions . the explanation of why the oscillations appear seems to lie in the sort of a ` binary tree structure ' of the functional @xmath187 , whose coefficients are negative powers of @xmath188 . later on , robert @xcite and mohamed and robert @xcite found that such oscillating asymptotic behaviour is a typical feature of algorithms with a tree structure . this phenomenon is compelling and deserves further studies . exponential functionals of poisson process and , more generally , of lvy processes , appear in a number important applications . for instance , they are relevant to the analysis of randomised algorithms @xcite and in mathematical finance @xcite . in @xcite and @xcite the exponential functionals of poisson processes , and , respectively , of compound poisson processes , play a key role in the analysis of the limiting behaviour of a transmission control protocol connection for the internet . we refer to the survey @xcite for further applications , results and references . the study of exponential functionals of lvy processes are a current subject of research , see e.g. @xcite , @xcite . one of the most intriguing mathematical observations that arise when studying the two - carousel model presented in section [ s : maria ] is that recursion differs from the original lindley s recursion @xcite , which is @xmath189 , only in the change of a plus sign into a minus sign . at the right - hand side of these two recursions , the sign in front of @xmath111 is reversed . lindley s recursion describes the waiting time @xmath190 of a customer in a single - server queue in terms of the waiting time of the previous customer , his or her service time @xmath191 , and the interarrival time @xmath109 between them . it is one of the fundamental and most well - studied equations in queuing theory . for a detailed study of lindley s equation we refer to asmussen @xcite , cohen @xcite , and the references therein . in the applied probability literature there has been a considerable amount of interest in generalisations of lindley s recursion , namely the class of markov chains , which are described by the recursion @xmath192 . the model in section [ s : maria ] is a special case of this general recursion and it is obtained by taking @xmath193 . many structural properties of the recursion @xmath192 have been derived . for example asmussen and sigman @xcite develop a duality theory , relating the steady - state distribution to a ruin probability associated with a risk process . for more references in this domain , see for example borovkov @xcite and kalashnikov @xcite . an important assumption which is often made in these studies is that the function @xmath194 is non - decreasing in its main argument @xmath195 . for example , in @xcite this assumption is crucial for their duality theory to hold . clearly , in the special case of @xmath193 which is discussed in section [ s : maria ] , this assumption does not hold . this fact produces some surprising results when analysing the equation . the implications of this ` minor ' difference in sign are rather far reaching . for example , in section [ s : maria ] we have presented two results in theorems [ 3th : erlang / u ] and [ 3th : densityold ] , where we have seen that the waiting time of the picker can be solved for explicitly . for lindley s recursion , i.e. with a plus sign instead of minus sign for @xmath119 in stationarity , this case correspond to the stationary waiting time in a classical single - server ph / u/1 queue . however , this equation has no simple solution for lindley s recursion , while we have derived a closed - form expression for the carousel recursion . furthermore , numerical results ( see also figure [ fig : throughput ] ) show that for this carousel model the mean waiting time is not very sensitive to the coefficient of variation of the pick time , which is in complete contrast to lindley s recursion . for these reasons , we believe that it is interesting to investigate in detail the impact on the analysis of such a ` slight ' modification to the original equation . in this section , we highlight some of the differences of these two models . for the single - server queue , i.e. lindley s recursion , it is well - known ( * ? ? ? iii.6 ) that the random variables representing waiting times of customers converge in distribution ( and in total variation ) when the mean of the associated random walk is less than zero , or equivalently when the traffic intensity @xmath196 is less than 1 ; i.e. , when @xmath197<{\mathbb{e}}[a]$ ] , where we recall that @xmath153 is the generic service - time random variable , and @xmath152 is the generic interarrival - time random variable . for the two - carousel model , though , which is given by recursion , the situation is slightly different . in case @xmath198>0 $ ] , the stochastic process @xmath199 is an aperiodic , ( possibly delayed ) regenerative process with the time points where @xmath200 being the regeneration points . moreover the process has a finite mean cycle length . to see this , let @xmath201 , define the stopping time @xmath202 , and observe that a generic cycle length is stochastically bounded by @xmath121 and that @xmath203\leqslant{\mathbb{p}}[x_k > 0 \mbox { for all } k=2,\dotsc , n+1]={\mathbb{p}}[x_2 > 0]^{n}.\ ] ] moreover , we have that @xmath204<1 $ ] because of the condition @xmath198>0 \leftrightarrow { \mathbb{p}}[x<0]>0 $ ] . therefore , from the standard theory on regenerative processes it follows that the limiting distribution exists and the process converges to it in total variation . through coupling , stability can be shown also for the case where @xmath205=0 $ ] ; see @xcite for details . we see thus that while for lindley s recursion the stability condition is given by @xmath206<0 $ ] , for recursion _ stability always holds _ ; moreover , excluding the deterministic case , we have convergence in total variation . for lindley s recursion , there has been a substantial amount of investigations on the behaviour of @xmath207 $ ] as @xmath208 , the state of the art can be found in @xcite . results of this type for recursion have been derived in @xcite . if the right tail of @xmath209 is regularly varying of index @xmath210 ( see @xcite for background ) , then @xmath211 { \mathbb{p}}[x > x].\ ] ] if the right tail of @xmath209 is of rapid variation ( see again @xcite ) , then @xmath212 { \mathbb{p}}[x > x].\ ] ] in both equations , we use the notational convention @xmath213 to denote @xmath214 as @xmath215 . note that the class of distributions covering these results include all phase - type distributions , as well as the weibull , gamma , lognormal and pareto distributions . moreover , these results indicate that large values of @xmath119 are caused by a single large value of @xmath30 . this is contrasting with the qualitative picture for lindley s recursion , where a large value of @xmath119 is most likely caused only by a single big jump only in the case where @xmath30 is heavy - tailed . if @xmath30 is light - tailed ( for example phase type ) , then a large value of @xmath119 is the cause of a more intricate event involving a change of measure ; see @xcite for background . a natural question is whether it is possible to unify the results for lindley s recursion and recursion . this is possible by considering a recursion that has a minus before @xmath111 ( cf . recursion too ) only with probability @xmath216 , @xmath217 $ ] , and has a plus before @xmath111 ( i.e. equal to lindley s recursion ) with probability @xmath218 . for this recursion , the tail behaviour has been studied in @xcite under assumptions similar to the ones made in @xcite . to summarise the qualitative picture emerging from that paper , the tail behaviour for the unified recursion with @xmath217 $ ] converges continuously to the results for recursion ( i.e. if @xmath219 ) for the heavy - tailed case , while it has a discontinuity for @xmath220 ; for the so - called cramr case the result is reversed : the unified recursion is continuous for @xmath220 and discontinuous for @xmath219 , while for the intermediate case ( where @xmath30 is light tailed but does not satisfy the cramr condition ) the results for the unified recursion are continuous at both end - points . it is well known that for lindley s recursion , the time - dependent waiting - time distribution is determined by the solution of a wiener - hopf problem , see for example @xcite and @xcite . recursion though , regularly gives rise to _ generalised _ wiener - hopf equation . for example , in @xcite we have derived a generalised wiener - hopf equation for the density of the stationary waiting time , while @xcite contains an integral equation for the generating function of the distribution of @xmath111 that is equivalent to a generalised wiener - hopf equation , which can not be solved in general . in noble @xcite it is shown that such equations can sometimes be solved , but a general solution , as is possible for the classical wiener - hopf problem ( arising in lindley s recursion ) , seems to be absent . this makes it appear that may have a more complicated time - dependent behaviour than lindley s recursion . however , a point we make in @xcite is that this is not necessarily the case . thus , equation is a rare example of a stochastic model which allows for an _ explicit _ time - dependent analysis . the reason is that , if @xmath221 has a phase - type distribution , we can completely describe in terms of the evolution of a finite - state markov chain . we shall refrain from giving all results on the time - dependent behaviour of or their differences from the classical lindley recursion for the single - server queue , as these results have been well documented elsewhere @xcite . here , we simply list the major findings . other than deriving the time - dependent waiting time distribution for under the assumption that the random variables @xmath222 are phase - type distributed , one can derive explicit expressions for the correlation between two waiting times . it results that the covariance function @xmath223 between two waiting times with lag @xmath224 converges to zero geometrically fast in @xmath224 . this is consistent with the fact that the distribution of @xmath111 converges geometrically fast to that of @xmath119 , cf . vlasiou @xcite . one of the properties of @xmath223 is that it is non - negative if @xmath224 is even and non - positive if @xmath224 is odd . if in addition , the random variable @xmath225 has a strictly positive density on an arbitrary interval , then the inequalities are strict . in contrast , the literature on the covariance function of the waiting times for the single - server queue seems to be sporadic . for the g / g/1 queue , daley @xcite and blomqvist @xcite give some general properties . in particular , in @xcite it is shown that the serial correlation coefficients of a stationary sequence of waiting times are non - negative and decrease monotonically to zero . as we have mentioned before , @xmath117 , as given by , is a regenerative process ; regeneration occurs at times when @xmath200 . other transient results relate to the length of a generic regeneration cycle @xmath226 . for recursion , we do not need to resort to the usage of generating functions , as is necessary when analysing the corresponding quantity in lindley s recursion . note that the interpretation of @xmath226 for the carousel model is completely different from the corresponding quantity for lindley s recursion . there , @xmath226 represents the number of customers that arrived during a busy period . in the carousel setting , @xmath226 represents the number of pauses a picker has until he needs to pick two consecutive orders without any pause . in this sense @xmath226 can be seen as a `` non - busy period '' . when deriving equation , one of the main assumptions we have made , which led to this particular form for the equation is that the picker is not allowed to pick two consecutive orders at the same carousel and must alternate between the two carousels ( thus picking all odd - numbered orders from one carousel and all even - numbered orders from the other ) . this condition is crucial . if we remove this condition , then under certain distributional assumptions , the problem turns out to be the classical machine repair problem , and certain analogies between these two models arise . in the machine repair problem , there is a number of machines working in parallel ( two in our situation , corresponding to the two carousels ) and one repairman ( corresponding to the picker ) , who serves the machines when they fail . the machines are working independently and as soon as a machine fails , it joins a queue formed in front of the repairman where it is served in order of arrival . a machine that is repaired is assumed to be as good as new . the machine repair problem , also known as the computer terminal model ( see for example bertsekas and gallager @xcite ) or as the time sharing system ( see , e.g. , asmussen @xcite or kleinrock ( * ? ? ? * section 4.11 ) ) is a well studied problem in the literature . it is one of the key models to describe problems with a finite input population . a fairly extensive analysis of the machine repair problem can be found in takcs ( * ? ? ? * chapter 5 ) . in @xcite we compare the two models and discuss their performance . the issue that is usually investigated in the machine repair problem is the waiting time of a machine until it becomes again operational . in the situation described in section [ s : maria ] though , we are concerned with the waiting time of the repairman . it is quite surprising that although the machine repair problem under general assumptions is thoroughly treated in the literature , this question remains unanswered . in the machine repair problem the operating time of the machine is usually more valuable than the utilisation of the repairman , which might explain why the classical literature has been mainly focused on performance measures related to the machines . in @xcite the waiting time of the repairman is derived under the assumption that ` rotation ' times follow a phase - type distribution while ` pick ' times are generally distributed . moreover , it is shown that the random variables for the waiting time for the picker / repairman in the two models _ are not stochastically ordered_. however , on average , the alternating strategy connected to the two - carousel model leads to longer waiting times for the picker , which readily implies that the _ throughput of the machine repair model is bigger_. furthermore it is shown that the probability that the picker does _ not _ have to wait is _ larger _ in the two - carousel alternating system than in the machine repair ( i.e. non - alternating ) model one . this result is perhaps counterintuitive , since the inequality for the mean waiting times of the picker in the two situations is reversed . regarding the relationship between the @xmath13-th waiting time of the picker in the two - carousel alternating model ( denote this by @xmath227 ) , and that of the repairman in the machine repair problem ( let this be given by @xmath228 ) , an immediate corollary of the results stated above is as follows . for all @xmath13 , @xmath229 so , although the stationary random variables @xmath230 and @xmath231 are not stochastically ordered , the partial sums of the sequences @xmath232 and @xmath233 are . moreover , a conjecture stated in @xcite suggests that a direct application of the karlin - novikoff cut - criterion ( cf . szekli @xcite ) leads to an _ increasing convex ordering _ , namely : for all increasing convex functions @xmath234 , for which the mean exists , we have that @xmath235\leqslant{\mathbb{e}}[\phi(w^{\mathrm{a}})].\ ] ] the essence of layered queueing ( a special case of which is rendezvous networks ) is a form of simultaneous resource possession @xcite . in its most simple form in computer science applications , in a rendezvous network , a task may serve requests in two rounds ( phases ) of service . in computer applications , tasks or applications may act both as customers that needs service from other tasks and as servers to other tasks too . as a naive example , think of an application that adds up numbers . it acts both as a server , accepting requests from other applications that need numbers added , and as a customer , requiring service from the central processing unit . one can imagine that tasks are ordered in several levels or layers . tasks have directed arcs to other tasks at lower layers to represent service requests . a request from an task ( client ) to a lower - layered task ( server ) may return a reply to the requester ( a synchronous request , or rendezvous ) . while in the first phase ( i.e. in the rendezvous ) the client is blocked and the server merely continues the thread of control of its client . however , in the second phase the client has an independent thread of control of its own . for example , task a makes a request to task b which then makes a request to task c. while task c is servicing the request from task b , tasks a and b are both blocked @xcite . among the advantages of the rendezvous is efficiency , since it provides communication without the effort of buffer management and the message copying associated with asynchronous communication . however , some potential for concurrency is lost , and there may be performance - impairing bottlenecks when a key task spends long periods send - blocked @xcite . special approximations are needed to solve queueing models which contain a two - phase server , because the second phase effectively creates a new customer in the queueing network , violating the conditions of product form queueing @xcite . distributed or parallel software with synchronous communication via rendezvous is found in client - server systems and in proposed open distributed systems , in implementation environments such as ada , v , remote procedure call systems , in transputer systems , and in specification techniques such as csp , ccs and lotos . the delays induced by rendezvous can cause serious performance problems , which are not easy to estimate using conventional models which focus on hardware contention , or on a restricted view of the parallelism which ignores implementation constraints . stochastic rendezvous networks are queueing networks of a new type which have been proposed as a modelling framework for these systems . they incorporate the two key phenomena of _ included service _ and the _ second phase of service _ mentioned above . the main work on rendezvous networks focuses on mean value analysis and gives approximate performance estimates . this method has been applied to moderately large industrial software systems @xcite . a layered queuing network ( lqn ) model is a canonical form for extended queueing networks that represent layered service . in a layered queue a server , while executing a service , may request a lower layer service and wait for it to complete . thus , in lqns there exist entities that have a dual role ; they act as servers to other entities of a lower layer and as customers to higher layered entities . the service time of the upper server includes the queueing delay and service time of the lower server , and this may extend through multiple layers . lqn was developed for modelling software servers , with for example blocking remote procedure calls to lower layer software servers , however it applies to any extended queueing network in which resource usages are nested , lower layer usages within higher layer usages @xcite . the two - carousel model we have presented in section [ s : maria ] is a layered queue , and in particular a rendezvous network . to see this , organise the system as follows . the items that are stored on the carousel and have to be picked comprise the lowest layer . carousels are in the middle layer , while the picker is put in the highest layer . one may view the rotation time of a carousel as a first phase of service for the item that will be picked . the carousel ( middle layer ) acts in this case as a server . however , the second phase of service ( the actual picking ) does not necessarily happen immediately ( rendezvous ) . the item might have to wait for the picker to return from the previous carousel cf . recursion . at this stage , the carousels act as customers waiting to be served by the higher layer , the picker . we see thus that each carousel acts both as a server ( rotating items to the picking location ) and as a customer ( waiting until the picker completes his task before the carousel can resume its role as a server , bringing the next item to the picking location ) . layered systems are quite unknown outside the computer - science community . e.g. , in @xcite it is mentioned that `` this paper presents a model , never studied before in the queueing literature , of a system of two connected queues where customers of one queue act as the servers of the other queue '' a comment that may very well be valid outside the computer - science literature . the analysis of recursion , as it developed in @xcite as well as @xcite are the only papers we are aware of that deal with lqns using analytic and probabilistic tools , and admittedly all the aforementioned work on the two - carousel model had not made the connection between this model and layered queues . however unusual it might be in queuing theory to encounter a non - increasing lindley - type recursion , recursion appears in problems involving the computation of the distribution of the maximum weight of an independent set in a sparse random graph . consider an @xmath3-node sparse random @xmath236-regular graph ( i.e. a graph selected uniformly at random from the set of all graphs on @xmath3 nodes in which every node has degree @xmath236 ) . an independent set is a set of nodes of the graph where no two nodes in the set are connected by an edge . suppose that the nodes of the graph are equipped with some nonnegative weights @xmath237 which are generated independently according to some common distribution @xmath238 . one may be interested for example in the limits of maximum weight independent sets and matchings in sparse random graphs for some types of i.i.d . weight distributions . then recursion corresponds exactly to the one related to the weight distribution in an 1-regular graph ; see @xcite . moreover , if one considers @xmath236-regular graphs , then the corresponding recursion giving the weight distribution in this case is similar to the one corresponding to the waiting time of a picker serving @xmath236 carousels ; see . the crucial difference in this case is in the random variables @xmath190 and @xmath111 appearing at the right - hand side of the recursion are not independent , while the corresponding variables in the recursion related to @xmath236-regular graphs are independent ; see ( * ? ? ? * eq . ( 3 ) ) . it would be interesting to investigate the connections between the research areas of warehouse logistics and graph theory . as mentioned in section [ s : nelly ] , as of yet the case of independent uniformly distributed items locations is the only known scenario where the travel time can be evaluated analytically by applying a systematic mathematical approach . it is important to develop methods to obtain statistical characteristics of the travel time under more realistic assumptions on the items locations . as we discuss below in section [ ss : picking a single order ] , there are not many results in this direction in the literature . the non - uniform distributions of pick positions and especially the correlations between the items in an order lead to challenging mathematical problems . we believe that no feasible analytical solutions can be obtained in most of the realistic models . thus , the problem calls for well justified heuristics and efficient numerical methods . the model we have considered in section [ s : maria ] applies to a two - carousel system that is operated by a single picker . two - carousel systems have received some attention in the literature ( cf . section [ ss : problems involving multiple carousels ] ) but many questions remain open . a line of research is directed towards studying the performance of two - carousel systems under various storage - assignment policies ( randomised or not ) , for various pick / travel time strategies and heuristics ( sequential picking , nearest - item heuristic , @xmath2-step strategies , etc . ) , for single- or dual - command cycles , and for open- and closed - loop strategies . here a single command cycle assumes a single operation , such as only storage or only retrieval . in a dual - command cycle , a storage and retrieval are combined to efficiently use the time of the operator . furthermore , an open - loop strategy implies that the carousel remains stationary at the point where the last item was retrieved ( awaiting the next order to be fed ) , while under the closed - loop strategy the carousel returns to a predefined point after the retrieval of an order is completed . as explained in section [ s : maria ] , two - carousel systems differ in nature and in analysis from the corresponding one - carousel problems even when studied under the same assumptions on the various storage , pick , cycle , and starting - point strategies that are followed . since two - carousel systems perform in broad terms better than single - carousel systems @xcite , studying the expected increase of the throughput of the system can help answer questions of financial nature , such as whether the benefits from the increased throughput justify the increased cost of building and operating a two - carousel system . the model discussed in section [ s : maria ] can be extended to the case of multiple carousels as follows . for instance , consider the situation where a single picker operates three carousels . apart from the number of carousels , all other characteristics of the model remain the same as in section [ s : maria ] . that is , we consider again an infinite queue of orders that need to be picked , we have again a rotation stage and a picking stage for each item . moreover , as before , the picker serves all carousels cyclically . for three carousels , this leads to the recursion @xmath239 where now the variables appearing at the right - hand side are not independent of one another , as was the case for all variables appearing at the right - hand side of recursion . we may assume for convenience that the sequences @xmath115 and @xmath116 are independent among them and between them . furthermore , we note that the waiting times @xmath240 and @xmath190 are not independent . the state of the system can be modelled e.g. as a two - dimensional markov chain , where apart from the waiting time of the picker for the @xmath3-th item that will be picked we also need to incorporate the remaining rotation time of the next carousel to be served . evidently , if the rotation times are assumed to be exponentially distributed , the system ( for three or more carousels ) can be analysed explicitly by similar techniques as the ones applied in chapter 4 of @xcite , although it is doubtful how realistic such an assumption is . naturally , if one considers a system with multiple carousels or stations , one can think about optimisation questions . namely , as the number of carousels increases , the waiting time of the picker is expected to decrease . after serving a long series of carousels cyclically , when you return to the beginning of the cycle , with high probability the item to be picked will have reached the origin . this implies that an item will have to wait for the picker at the origin more frequently than in the two - carousel system , which means that the throughput of a single carousel decreases . intuitively , as the number of carousels increases to infinity , the utilisation of the picker increases to one , while the throughput of each individual carousel decreases to zero . given a setting , one might wonder how many carousels a single picker can operate so that we maximise both the throughput of the carousels and the utilisation of the picker simultaneously . the ultimate goal of the analysis of carousel systems is to provide a mathematical model that adequately describes the reality and , at the same time , can be efficiently evaluated either analytically or numerically . at the moment , the literature on a single carousel has advanced enough to characterise the travel time with great precision , at least for independent uniform items locations . however , as mentioned above , single carousel systems are rarely used in modern warehouses . clearly , multiple carousel models are more relevant from a practical point of view . the drawback is that such models tend to become extremely complex . until now the studies of multiple carousel systems were either solely based on simulations or employed analytical models that involved simplifying assumption on the order picking time . for instance , in section [ s : maria ] we assumed that each order is collected within a random time that has the same distribution for each order . this is definitely a simplifying assumption , because , for instance , the orders may differ in size , and as we saw in section [ s : nelly ] , the distribution of the travel time depends on the number of items to be collected . further literature on multiple carousels discussed in detail in section [ ss : problems involving multiple carousels ] also involves significant simplifications of the real - life situation . in this respect , a major challenge for future studies is to develop a unified approach for rigorous studies of real - life automated storage and retrieval systems . such an approach is expected to involve the methods proposed so far for single and multiple carousels . in sections [ s : nelly ] and [ s : maria ] we presented well - developed methodologies for analytical studies of order picking in one and two carousel units . thus , an important topic for further research is to combine these two problems in one integrated study of multiple carousel systems . one may hope to obtain interesting analytical results in this direction because of the analytical nature of both methodologies . however , the problems of combining these two settings are challenging . in section [ s : nelly ] we have seen that the travel time distribution can be of a complicated form , while the results in section [ s : maria ] often rely on assumption such as exponential or phase - type pick times ( recall that the travel time needed to pick all items corresponds to the pick time for orders aggregated in one item ) . also , as mentioned above , the travel time depends on the size of the order , while the technique of aggregating orders in one item has made use of the assumed independence between pick times and rotation times ( while one might expect that in orders with multiple items , long travel times might be correlated to orders with multiple items and thus to shorter rotation times to the first item in the order ) . eventually , one will have to resort to the development of reasonable algorithms rather than the derivation of exact distributions . in this respect , we emphasise again that algorithmic studies of realistic carousel models constitute an important part of further research . it is also interesting to study if single or multiple carousel systems can be analysed in case there is an arrival process according to which the orders arrive . if orders arrive according to a poisson process in front of the carousel , what can be said for the waiting time of the picker ? this question can also be combined with a non - alternating system , where the picker serves the first carousel that has completed the rotation to the next item on that carousel that needs to be picked , or with bernoulli - type requests , where the picker has to serve with a certain probability the `` first '' carousel and with the complementary probability the `` other '' carousel ( potentially waiting for an item if none is present at the designated carousel ) . for each case , one should also consider the stability of the system in case the arrival rate of the orders is less than the throughput of the system with an infinite queue of orders . a polling system is comprised of a number of customer queues that are served in an order by a single server . in the literature on polling systems , the polling system with two queues where at each queue the server serves exactly one customer before switching to the other queue is often referred to as the _ 1-limited alternating - service _ model . the model described in section [ s : maria ] is closely related to such polling systems . the two main differences are the existence of an extra stage , the rotation time of the carousel , and the absence of an arrival process for the orders . in polling systems one deals only with one stage , which in the terminology of section [ s : maria ] is represented by the picking stage . extending the model of section [ s : maria ] by introducing an arrival process of the orders as suggested above , is equivalent to studying an 1-limited alternating - service model with switch - over times between the stations ( which can be seen as being equivalent to the rotation time towards the single item ) . the polling model with two queues , poisson arrivals , and no switch - over times has first been studied by eisenberg @xcite , where the main question studied is the queue - length distribution , as is often the case in the literature on polling systems . eisenberg @xcite gives the generating function for the stationary joint distribution of the two queue sizes . cohen and boxma @xcite study the single server queue with two poissonian arrival streams and no switch - over times . the server handles alternatingly a customer of each queue if the queues are not empty and it is assumed that customers of the same arrival stream have the same service time distribution . it is shown that the determination of the joint queue - length distribution at the departure epoch can be formulated as a riemann - hilbert boundary problem that can be completely solved for general service time distributions . introducing switch - over times increases the complexity of the problem . in boxma @xcite the analysis is extended to include switch - over times of the server between queues , under the restriction that both queues have identical characteristics . this work is further extended in boxma and groenendijk @xcite , where the authors no longer request that both queues have identical characteristics . it is assumed that service times and switch - over times are generally distributed . the literature on polling systems with alternating service is not limited to the references above but is rather extensive ; see @xcite for some references . it seems though , that the question regarding the waiting time of the picker for the 1-limited polling system with two carousels has not been considered outside the scope of @xcite . thus , introducing an arrival process for the orders in the model of section [ s : maria ] complements the existing literature on polling systems and forms a challenging problem . the interesting feature then is that the switch - over time between two queues depends on the current picking time . again , the results from section [ s : nelly ] can be incorporated into the model for adequate description of order picking times . an extension considered in polling systems is the _ @xmath224-limited _ service policy , where the server switches queues after having served at most @xmath224 customers in one queue . for an extensive list of references on @xmath224-limited polling systems see van vuuren and winands @xcite . the main focus of the existing literature is again on the queue - length distribution of all stations . as the authors note in @xcite , `` to this very day , not only hardly any exact results for polling systems with the @xmath224-limited service policy have been obtained , but also their derivations give little hope for extensions to more realistic systems '' . it is worth considering the @xmath224-limited service discipline under the exact setting we have established in section [ s : maria ] , where now the focus is on the distribution of the waiting time of the server . in the following , we classify the literature on carousels according to the main theme handled . this taxonomy allows for a better overview of the variety of the subjects examined . a crucial distinction is made between systems that involve a single carousel and systems with multiple carousels . the first four categories presented relate to single - carousel systems , while systems with multiple carousels are examined later on . the performance of a carousel system depends greatly upon the way it is loaded and the demand frequency of the items placed on it . an effective storage scheme may reduce significantly the travel time of the carousel . several strategies have been followed in practice to store items on a carousel . the simplest strategy is to place the items randomly on the carousel . _ randomised policies _ have been examined extensively @xcite , and various performance characteristics have been derived under the assumption that the items are uniformly distributed on the carousel . one way to improve the throughput of a carousel system is to adopt a storage policy other than the randomised assignment policy . ha and hwang @xcite have studied what they call the `` two - class - based storage '' , which is a storage scheme that divides the items in two classes based on their demand frequency . the items with a higher turnover are randomly assigned to one continuous region of the carousel , while the less frequently asked items occupy the complementary region . the authors show by simulation that the two - class - based storage can reduce significantly the expected cycle time , both in the case where a cycle is a single pick or storage of an item ( single - command cycle ) , and in the case where a cycle consists of the paired operations of storing and retrieving ( dual - command cycle ) . the same authors in @xcite examine the effects of the two - class - based storage policy on the throughput of the system , and present a case where there is a 16.29% improvement of this policy over the randomised policy . another storage scheme is suggested by stern @xcite . assignments are made using a _ maximal adjacency principle _ , that is , two items are placed closely if their probability of appearing in the same order is high . the author evaluates this storage assignment analytically by using a markov chain model he develops . the _ organ pipe arrangement _ for a carousel system is introduced in lim _ et al . _ @xcite and is proven to be optimal in beng @xcite and in vickson and fujimoto @xcite under a wide variety of settings . the organ pipe arrangement has been widely used in storage units , such as magnetic tapes @xcite and warehouses @xcite . this arrangement is based on the classical mathematical work of hardy , littlewood and polya @xcite . their concept is used in @xcite to minimise the expected distance travelled by an access head as it travels from one record to another . various optimality properties of this arrangement have been proven ; see for example keane _ et al . _ @xcite and references therein . in carousel systems , the organ pipe arrangement places the item with the highest demand in an arbitrary bin , the items with the second and third highest demands in the bin next to the first one but from opposite sides , and sequentially all other items next to the previous ones , where the odd - numbered items according to their frequency are grouped together and placed next to one another in a decreasing order from the one side of the most frequent item ( and similarly the even - numbered items are grouped together and placed to the other side ) . figure [ test ] illustrates the organ pipe arrangement . the numbers at the top indicate the ranking of an item in a decreasing order of frequency . park and rhee @xcite study the system throughput and the job sojourn times under the organ pipe arrangement , where independent one - item orders arrive according to a poisson process . they explicitly quantified the gain of the organ pipe arrangement compared to random assignment and showed that this gain grows with the ` skewness ' in the demand distribution . abdel - malek and tang @xcite study the travel times in carousels with @xmath241 bins and the organ pipe arrangement under the assumption that each order consists of one item and a sequence of orders forms a markov chain : if the current order requires bin @xmath218 then the next order requires bin @xmath242 with probability @xmath243 . the objective is to find the optimal assignment , which minimises the average travel time . their extensive numerical experiments show that although the organ - pipe arrangement is not optimal in this setting , it performs very close to optimality in a wide range of system parameters . the optimal solution in @xcite is determined by solving a _ quadratic assignment problem_. the quadratic assignment problem is a well - known optimisation problem on choosing an optimal permutation of @xmath3 coordinates of a vector @xmath244 in order to minimise @xmath245 , where @xmath226 is a cost matrix . such problems have a long history started with the work of koopmans and beckmann @xcite . litvak @xcite shows by experimental studies and by providing asymptotic results for large orders that in general the optimal storage depends on the order size . moreover , the organ - pipe storage is disadvantageous when an order is large . another question related to storage is about the number of items of each type that should be stored on the carousel in order to maximise the number of orders that can be retrieved without having to reload . this question is examined in jacobs _ et al . _ @xcite , where the authors propose a heuristic that yields a reasonable solution , the error of which can be bounded . this method has been improved by yeh @xcite , where a more accurate solution is obtained , and further on by kim @xcite , where it is observed that the heuristic described in @xcite does not always lead to the optimal solution . the author constructs an algorithm that yields the optimal solution . this algorithm is further improved in li and wan @xcite . this line of research has been continued in the recent paper by hassini @xcite . in the formulation used in jacobs _ et al . _ @xcite , the author determines the optimal allocation . along with exact optimal solutions for deterministic and stochastic demand , @xcite also provides heuristics that perform close to optimal . one of the most important performance characteristics of a carousel system is the total time to pick an order . the total time to retrieve all items of an order may be expressed as a sum of the total time that the carousel is travelling plus the total time that the carousel is stopped for picking . the latter is effectively the total pick time , and it is not affected by the sequence in which we choose to retrieve the objects . however , the total travelling time greatly depends upon the retrieval sequence . the analysis of the travel time under various strategies is , in general , a non - trivial problem . this problem , however , has been resolved for independent and uniformly distributed item locations @xcite , as we discussed in detail in section [ s : nelly ] . various picking strategies have been proposed . bartholdi and platzman @xcite assume a discrete model and study the performance of an algorithm and three heuristics that determine an efficient , but not necessarily optimal , sequence of retrieving all items . a heuristic is a simpler , non - optimal procedure that is based on a specific strategy . the heuristic methods proposed are the _ nearest - item heuristic _ , where the next item to be picked is always the one that is closer to the picker at any given moment , the _ shorter - direction heuristic _ , where the carousel chooses the shortest direction between the route that simply rotates clockwise and the route that rotates counterclockwise , and the _ monomaniacal heuristic _ , that always chooses to rotate to the right and pick items sequentially . the _ optimal retrieval _ algorithm that is presented enumerates all possible paths ; therefore , it is guaranteed to find the quickest sequence in which to retrieve a single order . in @xcite the authors prove among other things that the travel time under the nearest - item heuristic is never greater than one rotation of the carousel . et al . _ @xcite provide the upper bound of @xmath246 full rotations , where @xmath3 is the number of items in the order , and show that the new upper bound is tight . litvak and adan @xcite obtained the distribution and the asymptotic properties of the travel time under the nearest - item heuristic for uniformly distributed independent items locations . these results , based on properties of uniform spacings , have been discussed in detail in sections [ ss : narest - item ] , [ ss : asymptotic results ] . in @xcite , the first two moments of the travel time and the distribution of the number of turns are computed recursively by conditioning on the event that there is an empty space of size @xmath247 on one side of the picker s current position . we presume that such methods may lead to the travel time distribution in some special cases with non - uniform items locations . another interesting picking strategy that has been already discussed in section [ ss : m - step ] is the so - called _ @xmath2-step strategy _ , where the carousel chooses the shortest route among the ones that change direction at most once , and only do so after collecting at most @xmath2 items . in case of independent uniformly distributed items locations the average travel time under the @xmath2-step strategy is smaller than the one under the nearest - item heuristic already for @xmath96 ; see @xcite . the results by litvak and adan @xcite on the @xmath2-step strategies have been presented in section [ ss : m - step ] . in an earlier paper , rouwenhorst _ et al . _ @xcite apply analytical methods to study the case when @xmath85 . this means that the carousel changes direction after collecting at most two items . they interpret @xmath2-step strategies as stochastic upper bounds for the minimal travel time and present convincing numerical results on the excellent performance of such strategies . wen and chang @xcite model the carousel as a discrete bidirectional loop and assume that the time to move between the bins of a shelf is _ not _ negligible . they propose three heuristic solution procedures and compare their performance . an earlier version of this work can be found in wen @xcite . ghosh and wells @xcite model the carousel as a continuum of _ clusters _ and _ gaps _ , where a cluster is a segment on the circle that corresponds to a series of locations that have to be visited for the retrieval of an order , while a gap is the segment of the circle between two clusters . the authors develop two algorithms to find optimal retrieval strategies . in particular , to find an optimal path , they avoid a complete enumeration by noticing that a turn can never be made after covering more than 1/3 length of the carousel . stern @xcite studies properties of the optimal , i.e.minimal , picking sequence both for the _ open - loop _ strategy , where the carousel remains stationary at the point where the last item was retrieved ( awaiting the next order to be fed ) , and for the _ closed - loop _ strategy , where the carousel returns to a predefined point after the retrieval of an order is completed . he formally shows that under the open - loop strategy the carousel will change its direction at most once when following the optimal picking sequence , while under the closed - loop strategy the carousel will turn at most twice . a recursive expression for the distribution of the minimal travel time needed to collect one order of @xmath3 randomly distributed items in the open - loop scenario is given explicitly by litvak and van zwet @xcite . the case when positions of the items in an order are dependent has not received much studies . one way to model the dependencies is described by abdel - malek and tang @xcite who assume that the positions of successive items form a markov chain . in this setting , they study the performance of the organ - pipe storage rule . stern @xcite introduces correlations between items in an order by considering several order types , where each type corresponds to a fixed list of items . the work of wan and wolff @xcite focuses on minimising the travel time for `` clumpy '' orders , that is , orders concentrated on a relatively small segment of the carousel , and introduces the nearest - endpoint heuristic for which they obtain conditions for it to be optimal . in this setting , one can no longer assume that the items locations are uniformly distributed . moreover , there is clearly a strong dependence between items positions . the model with non - uniform items locations reflects a relevant situation when some of the items are required more frequently than others . most of the papers that assume distinct frequencies assume the orders of one item ( see e.g. @xcite ) . an interesting work on non - uniformly distributed items is given by litvak @xcite , where the focus is on the length of the shortest rotation time needed to collect a single order when the order size is large and the items locations have a non - uniform continuous distribution with a positive density @xmath107 on @xmath136 $ ] . a popular strategy for reducing the mean travel time per order in carousel storage and retrieval systems is batching together a number of orders and then picking them sequentially . batch _ is a set of orders that is picked in a single tour . two consecutively picked items do not necessarily belong to the same order . an excellent literature survey by van den berg @xcite on planning and control of warehousing systems addresses this issue and the problems that arise if large batches are formed . apart from the questions mentioned before , stern @xcite also considers the performance of a carousel for a fixed set of order types ( for example , big orders with many items , and small ones ) . bartholdi and platzman @xcite are mainly concerned with sequencing batches of requests in a bidirectional carousel . they specify the number of orders to be retrieved ( ignoring any new arrivals ) and propose three heuristic methods to solve this static problem . orders may be picked in any sequence ( and not necessarily at the order they arrive ) , but picks within the same order are performed consecutively . they define the _ minimum spanning interval _ , which is the shortest interval containing all the items of an order and , by assuming that the picker always begins and finishes retrieving an order at one of the endpoints of this interval , they construct the shortest matching chain by ordering the orders accordingly . this procedure may fail to give an uninterrupted sequence in which to pick the orders ; therefore , they propose the following heuristics . the first one , called the _ hierarchical _ heuristic , picks any order that happens to have a common endpoint with another order , and then travels clockwise until an unpicked endpoint is encountered , and repeats the procedure . the _ nearest - order _ heuristic is practically an extension of the nearest - item heuristic described earlier in the paper , as is the case with the _ second monomaniacal _ heuristic they propose . under these heuristics , they obtain upper bounds for the travel time . ghosh and wells @xcite assume that the orders have to be picked under a fifo sequencing restriction , which means that the first order to arrive at the warehouse is the first order that will be picked , and so on . since the orders are retrieved in a fifo fashion , the problem is reduced to finding how to retrieve each individual order so that the best overall retrieval is achieved . they develop an algorithm for the optimal retrieval path of @xmath3 orders via dynamic programming , and show how to update dynamically the solution when new orders arrive . rouwenhorst _ et al . _ @xcite model the carousel as an m / g/1 queuing system , where the orders are the `` customers '' that require service , and the service they get depends on the pick strategy that is followed . this approach permits the derivation of various queuing characteristics such as the mean response time and the waiting time when orders arrive randomly . the authors mention that the tight upper bounds for the mean response time can be further exploited to obtain also good approximations for excess probabilities of the response time . van den berg @xcite assumes either a fixed or an arbitrary sequence of orders . when the sequence of the orders is given , he presents an efficient dynamic programming algorithm that finds an optimum path that visits all orders in the specified sequence . furthermore , when there is no given order sequence , he simplifies the problem to a _ rural postman problem _ on a circle and solves this problem to optimality . the rural postman problem is the problem of finding the shortest route in an undirected graph which includes all edges at least one time . van den berg @xcite concludes that the obtained solution requires at most 1.5 revolutions more than a lower bound of an optimal solution to the original problem . simulation results suggest that the average rotation time may be reduced up to 25% when allowing a free order sequence . lee and kuo @xcite formulate the problem of optimal sequencing of items and orders as a _ multi - travelling salesman problem_. in the multi - travelling salesman problem , there are several salesmen in a home city , and each of the other cities has to be visited only by one salesman . using this formulation , lee and kuo @xcite provide efficient heuristics for optimal picking of several orders consisting of multiple items . all research papers mentioned so far that deal with travel time models of carousel systems assume average uniform velocity of the carousel . in other words , the main assumption is that the carousel travels with constant speed and the acceleration from the stationary position ( when a pick is performed ) to its full speed , as well as the deceleration from the maximum speed to zero speed , are negligible factors when computing the travel time of the carousel . guenov and raeside @xcite give some empirical evidence that the error induced when neglecting acceleration and deceleration of an order picking vehicle is indeed negligible . thus the problem of minimising retrieval times can be considered to be equivalent to the problem of minimising the average distance travelled by the carousel per retrieval . hwang _ et al . _ @xcite , however , develop strategies for picking that take into consideration the variation in speed of the carousel . for unit - load automated storage and retrieval systems there are several travel - time models that consider the speed profiles of the storage and retrieval robot . in @xcite some relevant references are given . unlike the unit - load automated storage and retrieval systems , almost all the existing travel - time models for carousel systems assume that the effects of the variation in speed are negligible . in @xcite the authors try to bridge this gap in the literature . they assume that the items are randomly distributed on the carousel and derive the expected travel time both in the case of a single command cycle and in the case of a dual command cycle . they verify the accuracy of the proposed models by comparing the results to results directly obtained from discrete racks . egbelu and wu @xcite study the problem of pre - positioning the carousel in anticipation of storage or retrieval requests in order to improve the average response time of the system . choosing the right starting point of a carousel in anticipation of an order is also referred as the _ dwell point selection problem . this strategy becomes relevant when the items are stored under the organ pipe arrangement . in this situation the dwell point should be chosen to be the location of the most popular item ; see , e.g. , @xcite . spee @xcite is concerned with developing design criteria for carousels . he states the basic conditions for designing an automatic order picking system with carousels and comments on the optimal storage design . namely , he is interested in finding the right number of picking robots and the right number and dimensions of a carousel so that the investment is minimised , provided that the size of the orders that need to be retrieved is given . mcginnis @xcite studies some of the design and control issues relevant to _ rotary racks_. a rotary rack is an automated storage and retrieval system that strongly resembles carousels . in fact , conceptually , a rotary rack is simply a carousel , where the only difference is that each level or shelf of this carousel can rotate independently of the others . the author concludes that , while rotary racks appear to be a simple generalisation of conventional carousels , the control strategies that have been shown effective for carousels do not appear to be as effective for these systems . rotary racks can be viewed as a multiple - carousel system ( where each level is considered as a sub - carousel ) with a single picker . while almost all work mentioned in this section concerns one - carousel models , real applications have triggered the study of models involving multiple carousels . the study of such models is not as developed yet as the study of models involving a single carousel . the list of references that follows seems to be complete . perhaps the first academic study that investigates the performance of a system involving several carousels is that of emerson and schmatz @xcite . the authors simulated the operation of the warehouse of rockwell s collins telecommunications products . the system consists of twenty - two carousels , where each pair of carousels had a single - operator station ( so there are in total eleven operator stations ) . the questions they are concerned with are how big the batch size of orders should be so as to complete the week s work ( which is used as a performance measure ) and keep all operators busy , what happens when a carousel or a station is down , and how is an overload or an imbalance ( for example , unequal operator performance , unequal carousel loading , or large orders ) handled . in order to investigate potential solutions to these three imbalance conditions , the authors investigate two operating rules . the first operating rule studies six different storage schemes with seven carousel pairs ( and thus seven operators ) . it uses simulation models to study simple storage schemes such as random storage , sequential alternating storage , and storage in the carousel with the largest number of openings . the aim in @xcite is to study the degree of carousel usage . the authors find that there is no significant difference between the carousel loads among the storage schemes . however , they do not treat the problem of optimally assigning items to carousel bins , and do not present any analytical models to help investigate the problem . the second operating rule they investigate is a floating operator . this is an operator who is trained to work at any station , and who is moving to different stations according to specific needs ( for example , depending on the size of the queue at a particular station ) . they conclude that this solution seems advantageous for the purposes of the warehouse they investigate . koenigsberg @xcite presents analytic solutions for evaluating the performance of a single carousel , and discusses the ways in which his approach can be extended to a system involving two unidirectional carousels both served by a single robotic operator . the carousels are related only through the state of the robot , which means that each carousel is independent of the other except for the time it waits for an operation to commence ( such as pick , storage , or repair ) because the robot is busy at the other carousel . the author concludes that under some conditions , it is often more advantageous to have two carousels of identical length instead of one carousel of double the length . furthermore , going to three carousels of equal length ( i.e. one third of the length of the single carousel ) will offer little further improvement . hwang and ha @xcite study the throughput performance both of a single and of a double carousel system . based on a randomised storage assignment policy , cycle time models are developed for single and dual commands . furthermore , they examine the value of the information on the succeeding orders in terms of system efficiency , which may lead to better scheduling of the orders to be processed . in a later work , et al . _ @xcite attempt to measure analytically the effects of double shuttles of the storage and retrieval machine ( i.e. the robotic picker ) on the throughput both of the standard and of the double carousel system . storage and retrieval machines with double shuttles are machines that have space for two items . thus , for example , an item can be retrieved from the carousel and stored on one shuttle , while the other shuttle has an item that needs to be stored to the carousel . after this item is stored , a second item can be retrieved from the carousel and placed on the empty shuttle . all these operations occur during a single cycle of the carousel operation . for the double carousel system , a retrieval sequence rule is proposed which utilises the characteristics of the two independently rotating carousels . from the test results , double shuttles are shown to have a substantial improvement over single shuttles . this improvement tends to be more prominent in the double carousel system . due to cost concerns , the authors note that an economic evaluation will be needed to justify the extra cost of double carousel systems and double shuttles before implementing them in real world situations . wen _ et al . _ @xcite consider a system comprised of two carousels and a single retrieval machine . their main assumption is that every order must be picked in a single tour , i.e. , an order can not be divided into two or more sub - tours . batching orders together is also not allowed . they analyse the retrieval time and propose four heuristic algorithms for the scheduling sequence of retrieving items from the system to satisfy an order . their method is an extension of the algorithm presented in @xcite and @xcite . meller and klote study the throughput of a group of several carousels , a so - called carousel pod @xcite . they use approximations to evaluate the order pick time in one carousel and then evaluate the throughput of a pod by plugging in the average response times of each unit and modelling the pod of @xmath248 carousels as a queuing system where @xmath249 picker operates one carousel . further , they derive an approximation for the system s throughput using a diffusion approximation by gelenbe @xcite which was earlier applied by bozer and white @xcite in the analysis of end - of - aisle order - picking systems . recently , hassini and vickson @xcite studied storage locations for items , aiming to minimise the long - run expected travel time in a two - carousel setting with a single picker . they assume that the products are available at all times ( so as to be able to ignore possible delays due to lack of stock ) , and that orders are not batched ; that is , the carousel system processes only single - item orders . this is applicable in situations where individual product orders are processed in a first - come - first - served policy , or when the next item to be retrieved is known only after the present one has been picked . the authors compare the performance of three heuristic storage schemes and a genetic algorithm @xcite that for small - sized problems completely enumerates the solution space . they conclude that none of the heuristic approaches leads to a solution that outperforms the algorithmic solution they provide . the same model is also studied by park _ et al . _ as is the case in @xcite , in @xcite the basic assumptions are that there is an infinite number of items to be picked and that an order consists of a single item . the authors , however , are not interested in storage issues . they further assume that the single operator , the picker , is alternately serving the two carousels . this may cause the picker to have to wait for an amount of time until the item at the carousel he is currently serving is rotated in front of him . they derive the distribution of the waiting time of the picker under specific assumptions for the pick times . this allows them to derive expressions for the system throughput and the picker utilisation . the model presented in @xcite has been extended further in vlasiou _ _ @xcite by removing all assumptions related to the pick times or rotation times . in related work , vlasiou _ et al . _ @xcite have shown that the two - carousel model studied in @xcite is equivalent to an alternating service queue , if one allows for rotation times with an infinite support . some of these results have been presented in section [ s : maria ] . finally , we would like to mention that there is a broad literature on automated storage and retrieval systems ( see e.g. the survey by le - duc @xcite ) . an extensive list of references has been also made available on - line by roodbergen @xcite . the authors would like to thank ivo adan for the suggestion to write this survey paper and for his active involvement in the research described in sections [ s : nelly ] and [ s : maria ] . in the netherlands , the three universities of technology have formed the 3tu federation . this article is the result of joint research in the 3tu centre of competence nirict ( netherlands institute for research on ict ) . poissonian exponential functionals , @xmath242-series , @xmath242-integrals , and the moment problem for log - normal distributions . in _ seminar on stochastic analysis , random fields and applications iv_. vol . 58 of _ progress in probability_. birkhuser , basel pp . 4556 . ( 1988 ) . two queues with alternating service and switching times . in _ queueing theory and its applications liber amicorum for j.w . cohen_. ed . o. boxma and r. syski . vol . 7 of _ cwi monographs_. north - holland , amsterdam pp . 261282 . ( 1997 ) . on the distribution and asymptotic results for exponential functionals of lvy processes . in _ exponential functionals and principal values related to brownian motion rev . mat . iberoamericana , rev . mat . iberoamericana , madrid pp . 73130 . real time optimisation of man on board order picking . in _ proceedings of the 10th international conference on automation in warehousing_. ed . j. white . ifs(publications ) , dallas , texas . . 8793 . stability bounds for queueing models in terms of weighted metrics . in _ analytic methods in applied probability_. ed . y. suhov . vol . 207 of _ american mathematical society translations ser . 2_. american mathematical society , providence , ri pp . 7790 . analysis of the efficiency of carousel and tote - stacker performance . in _ proceedings of the 7th international conference on automation in warehousing_. ed . j. white . springer , san francisco , california . . 173183 . analysis of multi - server systems via dimensionality reduction of markov chains . . school of computer science , carnegie mellon university pittsburgh , pa 15213 . available at http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~osogami/[http://www.cs . cmu.edu/@xmath252osogami/ ] . spacings revisited . in _ proceedings of the sixth berkeley symposium on mathematical statistics and probability ( univ . california , berkeley , calif . , 1970/1971 ) , berkeley , calif . , 1972 . california press , vol . i : theory of statistics _ , pp . 417427 . performance analysis of a carousel system . in _ progress in material handling research : 1996_. ed . r. j. graven , l. f. mcginnis , d. j. medeiros , r. e. ward , and m. r. wilhelm . the material handling institute , charlotte , nc pp . 495511 . automatic order picking system with horizontal racks . in _ progress in material handling research : 1996_. ed . r. j. graven , l. f. mcginnis , d. j. medeiros , r. e. ward , and m. r. wilhelm . the material handling institute , charlotte , nc pp . 545550 . . parts location and optimal picking rules for a carousel conveyor automatic storage and retrieval system . in _ proceedings of the 7th international conference on automation in warehousing_. ed . j. white . springer , san francisco , california . . 185193 . the order picking problem in the carousel systems . in _ proceedings of the 7th international conference on automation in warehousing_. ed . j. white . springer , san francisco , california . . 195199 . order picking for a two - carousel - single - server system in an automated warehouse . in proceedings of the 10th international conference on automation in warehousing_. ed . j. white . ifs(publications ) , dallas , texas . . 8793 . Abstract:

Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.

Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered . Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video . Paper: during the past decade it has become abundantly clear that there are several sub - classes of two - dimensional ( 2d ) spin liquids . @xcite perhaps best understood are the topological spin liquids that support gapped excitations which carry fractional quantum numbers . @xcite another possibility are gapless spin liquids with no topological structure . these gapless spin liquids will generically exhibit spin correlations that decay as a power law in space and which can oscillate at particular wavevectors . in such algebraic " or critical " spin liquids @xcite these wavevectors are limited to a finite discrete set , and their effective field theories will often exhibit a relativistic structure as is the case when the spinons in a slave particle construction are massless dirac fermions coupled to a u(1 ) gauge field . however , it is possible that the spin correlations exhibit singularities along surfaces in momentum space . these are analogous to the fermi surfaces in a fermi liquid but in such quantum spin - metals " a quasiparticle picture will presumably be inapplicable . spin liquids with a spinon fermi surface are examples of particular interest , and have been studied in a number of rvb works @xcite most recently as a candidate for a spin liquid phase @xcite in the organic compound @xmath1-(et)@xmath2cu@xmath2(cn)@xmath3 . developing a theoretical framework for itinerant 2d non - fermi liquids is arguably even more challenging than for spin liquids . towards this end recent work@xcite explored the possibility of an uncondensed quantum phase of itinerant bosons in two dimensions which is a conducting fluid but not superfluid . because of the characteristic nodal structure observed by moving one boson around another , ref . called such phases `` d - wave correlated bose liquids '' ( dbl ) . various physical correlators were found to be singular across surfaces in momentum space in the dbl . for example , the boson occupation number @xmath4 is singular at some `` bose surfaces '' like those illustrated in fig . [ fig : qycuts ] . other examples with critical surfaces have been studied recently in ref . . the central idea underlying this paper is that 2d phases of quantum spins and itinerant fermions or bosons with singular surfaces in momentum space should have definite signatures when restricted to a quasi one - dimensional ( 1d ) geometry , e.g. when the system is placed onto an @xmath0-leg ladder . to be concrete , suppose we have a singular 2d surface in momentum space in the ground state of some square lattice quantum hamiltonian . if we put the hamiltonian on an @xmath0-leg ladder , the transverse momentum @xmath5 becomes discrete . with large @xmath0 one would expect that the short - range energetics that stabilizes the 2d phase will still be present on the ladder and will lead to a set of 1d gapless modes where the discrete momenta cut through the singular surface , as illustrated in fig . [ fig : qycuts ] . the long wavelength physics of these 1d modes will be described in terms of some multi - channel luttinger liquid , behavior different than the parent 2d state . but the number of gapless 1d modes and their respective momenta characterizing the oscillatory power law decays would provide a distinctive fingerprint " of the parent 2d liquid . for example , the number of gapless 1d modes would grow linearly with @xmath0 and the sum of their momenta could satisfy some generalized luttinger volume . moreover , these signatures could be potentially exploited to approach the 2d phases from controlled numerical and analytical studies in quasi-1d . indeed , as we demonstrate explicitly in this paper , the ( putative ) singular surface of the 2d dbl phase is already manifest on the 2-leg ladder ! cuts through bose surfaces in some anisotropic 2d system placed on an @xmath0-leg ladder ; here for illustration @xmath6 . such bose surfaces appear in a dbl construction described in the text ; to avoid clutter , we do not show the fermi surfaces of the @xmath7 and @xmath8 slave particles . ] -2 mm the itinerant uncondensed dbl of ref . is constructed by writing a boson in terms of fermionic partons , @xmath9 and considering un - coupled mean field states of the @xmath7 and @xmath8 . the dbl phase on a square lattice is obtained by taking the @xmath7 fermions to hop preferentially along the @xmath10-axis and the @xmath8 fermions to hop preferentially along the @xmath11-axis . one can enforce the square lattice symmetry in the boson state by requiring that the @xmath7 and @xmath8 hopping patterns are related by a 90 degree rotation . to recover the physical hilbert space requires the condition @xmath12 at each site . within a gutzwiller projection approach the corresponding boson wavefunction is taken as product of two fermion slater determinants , @xmath13 in the dbl the @xmath7 and @xmath8 fermi surfaces are different , compressed in the @xmath10 and @xmath11-directions , respectively . this results in a characteristic d - wave - like nodal structure observed when moving one boson around another in @xmath14 . the boson momentum distribution function @xmath4 in the dbl is singular on two surfaces that are constructed from the @xmath7 and @xmath8 fermi surfaces as enveloping @xmath15 surfaces . more details are in ref . , while fig . [ fig : qycuts ] shows one example of the @xmath15 loci for an open @xmath7 fermi surface and a closed @xmath8 fermi surface ( the fermi surfaces themselves are not shown ; this dbl state would be anisotropic on the square lattice but is closer to the ladder states considered here where there is no 90 degree rotation symmetry ) . as an alternative to the gutzwiller construction one can project into the physical hilbert space within a gauge theory approach , coupling @xmath7 and @xmath8 with opposite gauge charges to an emergent u(1 ) gauge field . ref . also proposed a frustrated boson model with ring exchanges that can potentially realize such dbl phases : @xmath16 with @xmath17 . in addition to the usual boson hopping term this hamiltonian contains a four - site ring term acting on each square plaquette . with @xmath18 positive this term is frustrating " , violating the marshall sign rule of the hopping term making the system intractable by quantum monte carlo simulations . this boson hamiltonian was constructed@xcite by taking the strong coupling limit of the lattice gauge theory for the @xmath7 and @xmath8 fermions . increasing the disparity in the fermion hopping along the @xmath10 and @xmath11 axes corresponds to an increase in @xmath18 . in this paper , we make a first step in the proposed program of ladder studies by exploring the ring model eq . ( [ hring ] ) on a 2-leg ladder . of course , the picture of discrete @xmath5 cuts through two - dimensional surfaces is pushed to the extreme here . nevertheless and quite remarkably , in a wide parameter regime of intermediate to large ring couplings , we find an unusual phase which can be understood via the dbl construction eq . ( [ psidbl ] ) . this is a strong - coupling phase with no perturbative picture in terms of the original bosons . the slave - particle approach provides a new starting point , and the resulting gauge theory of the dbl can be solved by the conventional 1d bosonization tools , @xcite providing a consistent picture of the new phase . the paper is organized as follows . section [ sec : dbl_2leg ] sets the stage by describing dbl states on the 2-leg ladder . the main section [ sec : jk ] presents results of exact numerical studies of the @xmath19 model . the focus here is on the dbl phase that emerges when the conventional `` @xmath20 liquid '' is destroyed by the ring exchanges . however , the phase diagram is even more rich and contains two more unusual phases in which bosons are paired ; one of these phases can be accessed analytically as an instability of yet a different dbl phase . appendix [ app : gt ] summarizes the technical gauge theory description of the dbl phases while appendix [ app : oddends ] presents simple analytical results for the ring model in some limiting cases . section [ sec : concl ] concludes with an outline of future program of ladder studies . the dbl construction eq . ( [ psidbl ] ) proceeds by taking distinct hopping ground states for the @xmath7 and @xmath8 fermions . the hopping patterns of the two fermion species can be independent and need to only respect the ladder symmetries . there is a bonding and an antibonding band for each species . we take the @xmath7 fermions to hop more strongly along the chains and always assume that the chemical potential crosses both bands as illustrated in fig . [ fig : bands ] . we take the @xmath8 fermions to hop more strongly on the rungs and consider two cases shown in the bottom panels in fig . [ fig : bands ] : the dbl[2,1 ] phase " when only the bonding band of the @xmath8 fermions crosses the fermi level , and the dbl[2,2 ] phase " when both @xmath8 bands are partially occupied the first and second argument in the square brackets refer to the number of involved @xmath7 and @xmath8 bands respectively . and @xmath8 bands for the dbl construction on the 2-leg ladder . top panel : @xmath7 fermions partially occupy both the bonding and anti - bonding bands . bottom left : in the dbl[2,1 ] phase , @xmath8 fermions occupy only the bonding band . bottom right : in the dbl[2,2 ] phase , @xmath8 fermions partially occupy both bands ; this state is likely unstable towards a boson - paired phase , as discussed in sec . [ subapp : dbl22instab ] . in the wavefunction construction , only the occupied orbitals and not the band dispersions are important . ] -2 mm let us first discuss properties of the dbl[2,1 ] phase . we denote the fermi momenta of the @xmath7 bonding and antibonding bands as @xmath21 and @xmath22 , corresponding to the transverse momenta @xmath23 and @xmath24 respectively ( which is a convenient alternative to the quantum number for the leg interchange symmetry ) . we denote the fermi momentum of the @xmath8 bonding band as @xmath25 ( there is no @xmath8 antibonding occupation in the dbl[2,1 ] ) . the fermi momenta satisfy @xmath26 , where @xmath27 is the boson density per site and remembering that there are two sites in each rung while the lattice spacing is set to one . in a mean field treatment , the boson green s function is a product of two fermion green s functions and therefore oscillates at different possible @xmath28 wavevectors and decays as @xmath29 . going beyond the mean field as described in appendix [ app : gt ] , we expect that the oscillations at wavevectors @xmath30 have slower power law decay while the other two wavevectors @xmath31 have faster power law decay than the mean field . the complete result is , dropping all amplitudes , @xmath32}{x^{2 - \eta^{(0 ) } } } + e^{i\pi y } \frac{\cos[(k^\pd_{f2 } - k_{f1}^{(\pi ) } ) x ] } { x^{2 - \eta^{(\pi)}}}\\ + \frac{\cos[(k^\pd_{f2 } + k_{f1}^{(0 ) } ) x]}{x^{2 + \dots } } + e^{i\pi y } \frac{\cos[(k^\pd_{f2 } + k_{f1}^{(\pi ) } ) x]}{x^{2 + \dots}}.\end{aligned}\ ] ] the first line shows the enhanced correlators . these can be guessed using an `` amperean rule '' mnemonic inherited from the fermion - gauge studies in 2d and verified by the bosonization solution in appendix [ app : gt ] : composites that involve fermion bi - linears with opposite group velocities but that produce parallel gauge currents are enhanced by the gauge fluctuations . thus , low - energy `` bosons '' @xmath33 carrying @xmath34 are expected to be enhanced . the contributions in the second line , on the other hand , can be shown to be always suppressed beyond the mean field . appendix [ app : gt ] presents a complete low - energy theory of the dbl[2,1 ] which once the gauge fluctuations are treated contains two phonon modes and in principle allows calculating all exponents . since the power laws are affected also by short - range interactions , and there are many parameters allowed in the theory , we do not pursue this calculation in general , but mainly rely on the amperean rules that capture the gauge fluctuation effects ; this is reasonable if the gauge interactions dominate . the boson singularities at non - zero wavevectors become manifest upon fourier transformation of @xmath35 to obtain the boson occupation number @xmath4 . for example , at the enhanced wavevectors @xmath36 and @xmath37 , we have @xmath38 the boson density correlations are analyzed similarly . in a naive mean field , @xmath39 , which oscillates at various `` @xmath40 '' vectors and decays as @xmath29 . beyond the mean field , the power laws get modified : @xmath41}{x^{2 - \dots } } + \frac{\cos[2 k_{f1}^{(\pi ) } x]}{x^{2 - \dots } } \\ & & + e^{i\pi y}\frac{\cos[(k_{f1}^{(0 ) } + k_{f1}^{(\pi ) } ) x]}{x^{2 - \dots } } + e^{i\pi y}\frac{\cos[(k_{f1}^{(0 ) } - k_{f1}^{(\pi ) } ) x]}{x^{2 + \dots } } ~ , \nonumber \\ & & d_{d2}({\bf r } ) \sim \frac{1}{x^2 } + \frac{\cos[2 k_{f2 } x]}{x^{2 - \dots } } ~.\end{aligned}\ ] ] the distinct momenta are : @xmath42 , @xmath43 , @xmath44 , @xmath45 , @xmath46 , and @xmath47 . the first four involve a particle and a hole of the same species but with opposite group velocities and are therefore expected to be enhanced by the gauge fluctuations ; in the above equations , this is indicated schematically with @xmath48 . however , these correlators can also be affected either enhanced or suppressed by short - range interactions , and without knowing all parameters in the theory , we can not calculate the exponents reliably . the oscillation at wavevector @xmath46 can be shown to be always suppressed beyond the mean field . finally , the zero momentum power law remains unchanged . more details on the dbl[2,1]-phase can be found in appendix [ app : gt ] . in particular , we show that the two - boson green s function exhibits some internal d - wave character , which originates from the non - trivial wavefunction signs . it is these signs that prompted the name `` d - wave '' boson liquid ( dbl ) in the 2d continuum setting,@xcite where the wavefunction goes through a sequence of signs @xmath49 upon taking one particle around another . however , such correlations do not necessarily mean that the system is near a d - wave - paired phase . for example , we also examine a potential instability of the dbl[2,1 ] driven by an allowed non - marginal four - fermion term and find that the resulting phase is a boson - paired liquid with an internal s - wave character . let us briefly mention the dbl[2,2 ] case , where in the mean field both @xmath7 and @xmath8 have partial occupations of both the bonding and antibonding bands . one can calculate various correlations in the mean field as before , and the structure is more rich since there is an additional band present . some details are given in appendix [ subapp : dbl22instab ] . beyond the mean field but ignoring non - marginal four - fermion terms , this phase would have three gapless modes . however , an analysis of allowed interactions suggests that this phase has a strong instability towards a boson - paired phase with an s - wave character . remarkably , as we will see in the next section , a boson - paired phase with similar properties is found in the ring model in the regime of small interchain coupling @xmath50 where we initially hoped to find the dbl[2,2 ] phase . thus , the slave - particle formulation and the gauge theory description solved via subsequent bosonization open a non - perturbative access to this interesting boson - paired phase . the symbols represent dmrg estimates with shaded grey circles indicating the superfluid phase , the filled blue circles the d - wave correlated bose liquid ( dbl ) , and the open red diamonds the s - wave paired state . the schematic line boundaries are obtained from vmc calculations . ] we study the ring model eq . ( [ hring ] ) on a 2-leg ladder with a boson hopping term @xmath51 that allows different amplitudes along and perpendicular to the chains : @xmath52 where @xmath53 represent integer lattice sites . we take @xmath54 with @xmath55 and @xmath56 with @xmath57 the length of the 2-leg system . the ring terms are associated with the square plaquettes of the 2-leg ladder . we use exact diagonalization ( ed ) and density matrix renormalization group ( dmrg)@xcite methods supplemented with trial wavefunction variational monte carlo ( vmc)@xcite to determine the nature of the ground state of the hamiltonian eq . ( [ hring ] ) at boson filling number @xmath58 , where @xmath59 is the total number of bosons in the system . the obtained phase diagrams at densities @xmath60 and @xmath61 are shown in fig . [ fig : phased1 ] and fig . [ fig : phased2 ] respectively . these are typical results for the boson ring model away from half - filling . using ed and dmrg , we find four different quantum phases upon increasing the ring - exchange coupling @xmath18 and varying the interchain coupling @xmath50 . at small @xmath18 , the `` superfluid '' phase ( sf ) with @xmath20 quasi - long - range order ( qlro ) is stable for both filling numbers . the dbl phase , which is produced by the ring exchanges , dominates the intermediate parameter space at higher filling number @xmath60 , while it occupies a substantially smaller region at @xmath62 . interestingly , at @xmath60 and small @xmath50 , an s - wave paired phase emerges between the sf and dbl as a consequence of the competition between the boson hopping and ring - exchange terms . at @xmath62 and small @xmath50 , a d - wave paired phase is found adjacent to the dbl . finally , for strong ring exchanges phase separation eventually wins near @xmath63 for both fillings , separating into a region with @xmath64 and an empty region @xmath65 . the characteristic features of each phase will be discussed in the following sections . . the symbols indicate dmrg estimates for the various phases with shaded grey circles for the superfluid phase , filled blue circles for the dbl , and open green diamonds for the d - wave paired state . the schematic line boundaries are obtained from vmc calculations . ] our complementary vmc study is centered around the dbl phase . the dbl wavefunction eq . ( [ psidbl ] ) is constructed from the slave - particle formulation and thus allows us to compare between the exact ed / dmrg results and the gauge theory description . jastrow sf and boson - paired trial wavefunctions ( described in appendix [ app : psipaired ] ) are also considered in order to better understand the exact numerical results . we note that this variational approach has been rather successful in one dimension , e.g. , in the original studies of the 1d @xmath66 model . @xcite we borrow some ideas from these studies such as allowing the fermionic determinants to also play a jastrow role via @xmath67 , where @xmath68 is a variational parameter . in our ring model , the phase boundary estimated from vmc almost coincides with the one determined from dmrg as indicated in fig . [ fig : phased1 ] for @xmath60 filling . at smaller filling number , dmrg and vmc also find the same topology of the phase diagram as given in fig . [ fig : phased2 ] . we first describe measurements in the ground state . imposing periodic boundary conditions in the @xmath10-direction in our numerical calculations , we can characterize the ed states by a momentum @xmath69 . in our dmrg calculations we work with real - valued wavefunctions which gives no ambiguity when the system exhibits a unique ground state that caries zero momentum . if the ground state carries nontrivial momentum @xmath69 , its time - reversed partner carries @xmath70 , and the dmrg state is some real - valued combination of these . while the lattice - space measurements may depend slightly on the specific combination ( but vanishingly in the large system limit ) , the momentum space measurements @xmath4 and @xmath71 described below are unique and insensitive to this . in our dmrg calculations , more than 1500 states were kept in each block@xcite to ensure accurate results , and the density matrix truncation error is of the order of @xmath72 . the typical error for the ground - state energy is of the order of @xmath73 for all systems we have studied . the relative error in the correlation functions varies between @xmath74 , depending on the type of the correlations and the spatial distance between operators . we measure boson correlator in the ground state @xmath75 and its fourier transform @xmath76 which is interpreted as mode @xmath77 occupation number . we also measure the boson density correlator @xmath78 where @xmath79 is the average boson density . the density structure factor is @xmath80 for both the boson or boson density correlations , a power law @xmath81 envelope in real space gives rise to a singularity @xmath82 in momentum space . finally , we measure two - boson ( pairing ) correlator , @xmath83 which creates a pair of bosons at @xmath84 and removes a pair at @xmath85 . this is useful for detecting boson - paired phases where the single boson correlator decays exponentially . in the pairing correlator figures below , we present @xmath86 for a fixed created @xmath87 diagonal pair @xmath88 near the origin , while the removed pair is either a @xmath87 diagonal @xmath89 or a @xmath90 diagonal pair @xmath91 . we have measured the correlator for other pair orientations as well , but find that the diagonal - diagonal correlations are the most distinguishing ones in the two paired phases . when the amplitudes for the @xmath92 diagonals have the same sign , we refer to this as s - wave character ; on the other hand , when the signs are opposite , we call this d - wave . an extended discussion can be found in appendix [ app : gt ] following eq . ( [ phipair2d ] ) . and ( b ) the density - density structure factor @xmath71 for the 2-leg system at @xmath60 , @xmath93 , @xmath94 ; the system length is @xmath95 . the results are representative for the superfluid phase . ] and ( b ) the density - density structure factor @xmath71 for the 2-leg system at @xmath60 , @xmath93 , @xmath94 ; the system length is @xmath95 . the results are representative for the superfluid phase . ] . we show correlations for pairs on the diagonals @xmath96 and @xmath97 , but roughly similar values are obtained for all pair orientations . ] let us first discuss the phase at very small @xmath18 . the system is not frustrated in the @xmath98 limit and the ground - state wavefunction ( wf ) components in the boson occupation number basis should all be of the same sign ( positive ) to gain the lowest hopping energy . interestingly , the ed calculations for small @xmath99 and @xmath100 systems find that this feature of the wf remains robust up to a finite value of @xmath101 , close to the stability boundary of the sf phase . this is illustrated in the medium panel of fig . [ fig : ed_results ] where the average sign of coefficients in the ground - state wavefunction is plotted . the boson occupation number @xmath102 has a sharp peak at the wavevector @xmath103 . this is shown in fig . [ fig : sf_nq ] ( a ) for a system at @xmath60 , @xmath104 , @xmath94 , and length @xmath95 , calculated using the dmrg method . for this system size , the peak value at @xmath105 is about 100 times larger than the value at wavevector @xmath106 . this is consistent with the expected singular behavior @xmath107 and non - singular @xmath108 in the sf phase with 1d qlro ; the boson correlator decays as @xmath109 in real space and we estimate @xmath110 . as shown in fig . [ fig : sf_nq ] ( b ) for the same system , the boson density - density structure factor @xmath111 has a @xmath112 dependence around @xmath113 reflecting the global boson number conservation , while @xmath114 is nonzero and has no visible singularities . the pairing correlations in real space show power - law behavior , with nearly equal magnitudes for all pair orientations . this is shown in fig . [ fig : sf_pair ] where we create a @xmath87 diagonal pair near origin and remove either a @xmath87 diagonal pair or a @xmath90 diagonal pair near @xmath115 . furthermore , the exponent @xmath116 of the power - law @xmath117 in the pairing correlator is found to be @xmath118 , which is about four times that for the single boson correlator , @xmath119 . such behavior of the pairing correlations is expected in the sf phase , which has qlro in the single boson correlations . these features characterize the sf phase . it also has a finite @xmath120 , where @xmath121 is the `` superfluid stiffness '' , which we can measure in our numerical calculations by imposing a small twist in the boundary conditions . results from ed of a small system with @xmath99 are given in the top panel of fig . [ fig : ed_results ] and related dmrg measurements for larger systems are in fig . [ fig : delta_e ] ; these are discussed in more detail in sec . [ subsubsec : rhos ] . at filling @xmath60 and @xmath122 . shown are the superfluid stiffness ( top panel ) , the average sign of the ground - state wavefunction ( medium panel ) and the average double occupancy of rungs ( lower panel ) as a function of the ring exchange @xmath18 . ] at filling @xmath60 and @xmath122 . shown are the superfluid stiffness ( top panel ) , the average sign of the ground - state wavefunction ( medium panel ) and the average double occupancy of rungs ( lower panel ) as a function of the ring exchange @xmath18 . ] at filling @xmath60 and @xmath122 . shown are the superfluid stiffness ( top panel ) , the average sign of the ground - state wavefunction ( medium panel ) and the average double occupancy of rungs ( lower panel ) as a function of the ring exchange @xmath18 . ] and ( b ) the density - density structure factor @xmath71 for the 2-leg system at @xmath60 , @xmath93 , @xmath123 ; the system length is @xmath95 . the results are representative for the dbl phase . ] and ( b ) the density - density structure factor @xmath71 for the 2-leg system at @xmath60 , @xmath93 , @xmath123 ; the system length is @xmath95 . the results are representative for the dbl phase . ] as we further increase the strength of the ring - exchange @xmath18 , the system undergoes a ( first order ) phase transition where the stiffness @xmath121 drops steeply by a factor of two , see figs . [ fig : ed_results],[fig : delta_e ] and the subsection below . there is also an abrupt change in the character of the wavefunction sign which we can monitor in the ed analysis for small system sizes by simple counting and shown in the middle panel in fig . [ fig : ed_results ] . , there is also an abrupt change inside the dbl phase where the ground - state momentum jumps from @xmath124 to @xmath125 at around @xmath126 . we can understand these quantum numbers from specific orbital occupations in the dbl wavefunction approach , and the change of the total ground - state momentum arises from a change of orbital occupations in the @xmath8 bands . near @xmath127 vmc finds the optimal dbl state to be @xmath128_{\rm abc } \times { \rm det}_2 [ n_2^{(0 ) } = 6 , n_2^{(\pi ) } = 2]_{\rm abc}$ ] . the label `` @xmath129 '' stands for antiperiodic boundary conditions when specifying the mean field orbitals ; the total bosonic wavefunction satisfies periodic boundary conditions and carries momentum @xmath130 . for the larger @xmath18 , vmc finds the optimal dbl state @xmath128 \times { \rm det}_2 [ n_2^{(0 ) } = 5 , n_2^{(\pi ) } = 3]$ ] , where now the orbitals are specified with periodic boundary conditions ; this state carries momentum @xmath125 . ] this new phase has unusual phenomenology and can be identified as the dbl[2,1 ] phase : there is no boson peak at @xmath103 , but instead the boson occupation number @xmath102 shows singular points at nonzero wavevectors @xmath131 and @xmath132 , as if there is a `` condensate '' of bonding and antibonding boson modes at these @xmath133 . [ fig : dbl_nq ] presents characteristic plots of the @xmath102 and the density - density structure factor @xmath134 deep in this phase for filling @xmath60 taken at @xmath122 , @xmath123 , and a system length @xmath95 . for a system with @xmath122 and filling @xmath60 . data for systems with length @xmath135 and @xmath136 are given . the momenta are determined from the peak values of @xmath102 such as shown in the top panel of fig . [ fig : dbl_nq ] . ] the singular boson wavevectors @xmath137 and @xmath138 in general vary with parameters @xmath18 and @xmath50 . an example is shown in fig . [ fig : dbl_peak ] for the system at @xmath60 with @xmath93 and varying @xmath18 . just into the dbl phase near @xmath139 , we find a small @xmath137 and a large @xmath138 . in the wavefunction construction , this corresponds to rather different @xmath21 and @xmath22 , with significantly more @xmath7 fermions in the bonding than antibonding bands , see fig . [ fig : bands ] . when we increase the ring coupling , @xmath137 decreases while @xmath138 increases , corresponding to moving the @xmath7 fermions from the bonding to antibonding levels and making the two bands more equally populated . interestingly , we find that the relation @xmath140 is satisfied , consistent with the prediction from gauge theory of a luttinger - type theorem in the correlated boson phase . the identification with the dbl is bolstered by a trial wavefunction study . the optimal such state for the system in fig . [ fig : dbl_nq ] is @xmath141_{\rm abc } \right)^{0.75 } \\ & & \times \left ( { \rm det}_2 [ n_2^{(0 ) } = 32 , n_2^{(\pi ) } = 0]_{\rm abc } \right)^{0.1 } ~.\end{aligned}\ ] ] the length of the system is @xmath95 and the total boson number is @xmath142 . the @xmath7 determinant is constructed from @xmath143 bonding and @xmath144 antibonding orbitals , while the @xmath8 determinant is constructed from bonding orbitals only . to define the orbitals , we use antiperiodic boundary conditions ( `` abc '' ) along the @xmath10-direction for both @xmath7 and @xmath8 , which gives closed shells for the above occupation numbers , while the physical boson wavefunction respects periodic boundary conditions and carries zero total momentum . the determinant powers are understood as @xmath145 . the @xmath8 determinant can be written explicitly as @xmath146 \propto \prod_{i < j } \sin\frac{\pi ( x_i - x_j)}{l_x } ~ , \label{detjw}\ ] ] and in particular prevents two bosons from sharing the same rung . in fact , the exact ground states in the ed / dmrg have very small double occupancy of rungs deep in this phase , as illustrated in the lower panel of fig . [ fig : ed_results ] . the characteristic boson wavevectors in the above dbl state are @xmath147 and @xmath148 . these bosons are created by occupying @xmath7 and @xmath8 orbitals on the opposite sides , which is motivated by the amperean enhancement of such composites as described earlier . the overall match of the trial wavefunction results with the exact dmrg correlations is striking , reproducing the singular features as illustrated in fig . [ fig : dbl_nq ] . turning to the density structure factor @xmath134 , there are many features but they are also weaker than in the @xmath102 . for @xmath149 , we expect a linear @xmath112-behavior near @xmath113 and signatures at @xmath150 , @xmath151 , which we see , and also at @xmath152 , which we do not see in either dmrg or vmc ( we can understand this in the wavefunction because the power for the @xmath153 is small and suppresses density correlations coming from this piece ) . at @xmath154 , we expect signatures at @xmath155 and at @xmath156 , both of which we see . as discussed in appendix [ app : gt ] , it is a complicated matter to predict the exponents of the different singularities , and given our limited system size we do not attempt measuring these . it is remarkable that the dbl wavefunction can reproduce the singular features , but we do not know at this point whether it can reproduce all exponents in general . calculated by dmrg and vmc . we show correlations for pairs on the diagonals @xmath96 and @xmath97 , while values for other pair orientations are much smaller . ] finally , in fig . [ fig : dbl_pair ] we show the diagonal - diagonal pairing correlator . it is more short - ranged than in the sf phase as well as the two paired phases described below , but is characteristic of the dbl phase . first , @xmath157 has robust sign oscillations at wavevector @xmath158 . second , the @xmath87 and @xmath90 diagonal pairs have opposite signs ; the nontrivial sign structure in the wavefunction gives some `` d - wave''-correlated character to the boson liquid , which is observed in the two - boson correlator . to the periodic boundary connection along the @xmath10-direction . the energy difference @xmath159 , multiplied by @xmath57 , ( top panel ) for a uniform system with @xmath122 for all bonds ; ( lower panel ) for a specially designed system with @xmath122 in one half and @xmath160 in the other half of the system . ] to the periodic boundary connection along the @xmath10-direction . the energy difference @xmath159 , multiplied by @xmath57 , ( top panel ) for a uniform system with @xmath122 for all bonds ; ( lower panel ) for a specially designed system with @xmath122 in one half and @xmath160 in the other half of the system . ] in this subsection we want to further highlight some characteristic difference between the sf and dbl phases . in the sf state , the wavefunction has qlro at @xmath20 . imposing a twist boundary phase @xmath161 in the boson hopping term in the hamiltonian ( [ hring ] ) , one can measure the superfluid stiffness as @xmath162 , which is found to scale as @xmath163 in the sf phase . this stiffness calculated from ed is shown for the small @xmath164 system in the top panel of fig . [ fig : ed_results ] . for larger system lengths , the stiffness can alternatively be estimated by dmrg calculations of the energy difference for a @xmath165 twist , i.e. , @xmath166 . in the top panel of fig . [ fig : delta_e ] , we show @xmath167 as a function of the ring exchange @xmath168 for several system sizes @xmath169 . for isotropic hopping @xmath122 , we find that @xmath167 is essentially constant in the sf phase , but drops abruptly at the sf to dbl transition . in the dbl phase , @xmath167 shows rather irregular behavior including sign changes when varying either @xmath18 or @xmath57 . for a fixed system length @xmath57 , the more abrupt changes can be matched with the step - like changes of the singular momenta positions shown , e.g. , in fig . [ fig : dbl_peak ] for @xmath170 . for fixed ring exchange @xmath18 , the abrupt changes with varying @xmath57 are indicative of strong incommensurate correlations , where different @xmath57 offer varying degree of matching at the ( twisted ) periodic boundary : @xmath171 means that @xmath172 boundary conditions provide better matching than @xmath165 , while the situation is reversed if @xmath173 . a finite @xmath174 in the large system limit in the above setting implies that there is a propagating `` bonding '' mode ( i.e. , with transverse momentum @xmath175 ) . based on our picture of the dbl phase , there must also be a propagating `` antibonding '' mode with @xmath176 , which we would like to detect directly and contrast with the sf phase where there is no such mode . to this end , we design a system composed of two halves connected at both ends , where the left half is a @xmath177-hamiltonian while the right half is a @xmath178-hamiltonian . first , we note that a model with @xmath160 can be related to a model with @xmath122 by a transformation @xmath179 . this ensures that the boson density is the same in the two parts . crucially , this transformation interchanges the notions of bonding and antibonding modes . if the designed system is in the regime of the regular sf phase , the gapless bonding bosons in the half with @xmath122 can not penetrate into the other half where the gapless mode is anti - bonding , and vice versa . since the bosons are not able to propagate around the loop , a @xmath165 twist should not produce significant change @xmath180 which will vanish exponentially with @xmath57 . on the other hand , in the dbl phase there are gapless modes of both bonding and antibonding type in either region , so that bosons can propagate around the loop , and the @xmath181-twist should change the energy by an amount proportional to @xmath163 . the bonding / antibonding propagation stiffness " @xmath167 for the designed two - half system is shown in fig . [ fig : delta_e](b ) as a function of @xmath168 . indeed , we find a vanishingly small @xmath167 in the sf phase and a rather irregular but nevertheless finite @xmath167 in the dbl phase . in fig . [ fig : delta_e](b ) maintains a positive sign throughout the dbl phase , which can be understood roughly as follows : a boson propagates via a bonding mode ( with wavevector @xmath137 ) in one half and via an antibonding mode ( @xmath138 ) in the other half . the total phase accumulated by going around the system is @xmath182 for @xmath60 and the shown @xmath57 multiples of 6 . thus , the zero twist boundary condition provides the best ( crude ) matching for all @xmath18 . when we tried different @xmath57 ( not shown ) , the @xmath180 could be of either sign . ] and ( b ) the density - density structure factor @xmath71 for a 2-leg system at @xmath60 , @xmath183 , @xmath184 ; the system length is @xmath95 . the results are representative for the s - wave paired phase . ] and ( b ) the density - density structure factor @xmath71 for a 2-leg system at @xmath60 , @xmath183 , @xmath184 ; the system length is @xmath95 . the results are representative for the s - wave paired phase . ] for our 2-leg ladder system one might expect to find the dbl[2,2 ] phase if the interchain coupling @xmath50 is much smaller than the coupling @xmath51 along the chains : when the boson hopping between the chains is reduced , one expects that the fermion hopping between the chains is also reduced for both species , which in turn could bring the antibonding band of the @xmath8 fermions to cross the chemical potential as shown in the bottom right panel of fig . [ fig : bands ] . dmrg studies of the ring model at filling @xmath60 and small @xmath185 indeed find a phase that is distinct from both the dbl[2,1 ] and sf as shown in the phase diagram fig . [ fig : phased1 ] around @xmath186 . however , our measurements indicate that this phase is not a dbl[2,2 ] , but a paired phase . as shown in fig . [ fig : sw_nq ] for a system at @xmath60 with @xmath183 , @xmath184 , and length @xmath95 , this phase is characterized by a quite flat region in the boson occupation number @xmath187 near @xmath113 without any singular points , which is different from both the sf and dbl phases . on the other hand , the density - density structure factor @xmath134 has a singular behavior at a wavevector @xmath188 . this singular behavior can be approximated by @xmath189 , with @xmath190 between @xmath191 providing the best fit to the data , which corresponds to power law envelope @xmath192 in real space . [ note that when @xmath193 the number of bosons in each chain is independently conserved and @xmath194 must vanish at @xmath113 , which explains the small value of @xmath195 extracted by dmrg when @xmath196 in fig . [ fig : sw_nq ] . ] the observed phase can be identified as an s - wave boson paired phase with qlro pairing correlation as shown in fig . [ fig : sw_pair ] . the pairing correlation @xmath157 in this phase is strongly enhanced at large distances @xmath115 when compared to the correlation in the dbl phase ; the values are roughly similar for pairs straddling the chains but smaller for pairs inside the chains . the decay of @xmath157 can be fitted by a power law behavior @xmath197 with @xmath118 . we have also checked the single boson correlation in the real space : it is much reduced compared to the nearby sf and dbl phases and decays very quickly essentially exponentially ; in particular , it is much smaller than the boson - pair correlation beyond few lattice spacings . we then conclude that there is a gap to single - boson excitations , but not to pairs . this identification of the phase is also supported by a vmc study using paired boson wavefunctions described in appendix [ subapp : psisw ] , which improve the energetics over that of the trial dbl states and reproduce qualitatively the dmrg correlations . . we show diagonal pairs but roughly similar correlations are obtained also for pairs on the rungs , while correlations for pairs in the chains are significantly smaller . ] interestingly , the s - wave paired phase can be regarded as an instability of the dbl[2,2 ] phase . in appendix [ subapp : dbl22instab ] , we argue that without specially adjusted short - range interactions , the dbl[2,2 ] is unstable once the gauge fluctuations are included , and the most natural outcome is a paired phase with the same phenomenology as described above . in particular , the pairs are s - wave , carry zero momentum , and show qlro with power law @xmath198 , while we also predict power law charge correlations at wavevector @xmath188 with @xmath192 . in appendix [ subapp : dbl22instab ] we also predict that the two exponents are inverses of each other , @xmath199 . the dmrg estimates of the power laws differ somewhat from this , but they are hard to make accurate given the slow decay of the correlations and our limited system sizes . and ( b ) the density - density structure factor @xmath71 for a 2-leg system at @xmath62 , @xmath196 , @xmath200 ; the system length is @xmath201 . the results are representative for the d - wave paired phase . ] and ( b ) the density - density structure factor @xmath71 for a 2-leg system at @xmath62 , @xmath196 , @xmath200 ; the system length is @xmath201 . the results are representative for the d - wave paired phase . ] consider now bosons at small filling @xmath62 , fig . [ fig : phased2 ] . as we further increase @xmath18 , the dbl phase in the intermediate range becomes unstable and a new phase emerges . as shown in fig . [ fig : dw_nq ] for a system at filling @xmath62 with @xmath202 , @xmath200 , and length @xmath201 , this phase is characterized by @xmath203 , which is satisfied very accurately and is indicative of strongly suppressed boson correlator between the chains . we think that the peaks in @xmath4 are non - singular and represent short - range boson correlations , while @xmath35 decays exponentially on long distances : while we can not ascertain the exponential decay with our system sizes , the single boson correlator is already more than an order of magnitude smaller and decays much faster than the pair correlator described below . this phase is further identified as a d - wave boson paired phase with power - law pairing correlation as shown in fig . [ fig : dw_pair ] . the diagonal pairing correlations @xmath157 show opposite signs depending on the relative orientation of the two pairs : positive when both are @xmath87 diagonals and negative when one is @xmath87 and the other @xmath90 , which is consistent with the d - wave pairing picture . we find power law correlation @xmath204 with exponent @xmath205 the identification of this as d - wave paired phase is supported by the reasoning at low densities described in appendix [ subapp : boundstate ] . thus , for a pair of bosons on an otherwise empty ladder , there is a transition at @xmath206 where it becomes favorable for bosons to form a molecule with internal d - wave character . if we now have a system of bosons at small density , it is natural that there will be a parameter range where the bosons are paired and the resulting molecules form a luttinger liquid . to bolster this identification , we also studied such states variationally . as described in appendix [ subapp : psisw ] , we construct a trial wavefunction as a product of a pfaffian and a determinant , since these are simple to work with in vmc . optimal trial state for the system in fig . [ fig : dw_nq ] is @xmath207 \right)^{0.3 } ~.\end{aligned}\ ] ] the system length is @xmath208 and the boson number is @xmath209 . the pfaffian is for an antisymmetric ( spinless fermion ) pair - function @xmath210 that connects only sites on different chains ; the optimal `` size of the pair '' is @xmath211 . this is a `` @xmath212 '' pairing and when composed with a `` @xmath213 '' character present in the determinant this gives a d - wave character to the boson pairs . strictly speaking , the above state is valid only in the @xmath193 limit , since it prevents fluctuation of the boson number in each chain . still , as we can see from fig . [ fig : dw_nq ] , the variational wavefunction reproduces the dmrg correlations surprisingly well in this phase . the boson momentum distribution function for the trial state is ( by construction ) non - singular , so that the close agreement with the dmrg found for @xmath208 strengthens the identification of this phase as a d - wave paired . . ] finally we mention the signatures in the boson density shown in the lower panel in fig . [ fig : dw_nq ] . @xmath111 shows the familiar @xmath112 at small momenta and also a singularity at @xmath158 . the latter gives a wavelength equal to the spacing between the pairs , which is expected in a luttinger liquid of such molecules . the density singularity is not too strong and is in line with the slow decay of the pair correlator . as we further increase the ring exchange towards @xmath214 , the uniform phase becomes unstable to phase separation . for such large @xmath18 , the boson density will separate into half - filled and empty regions , which is energetically favored by the ring exchange term . in the ed of the small @xmath99 system , phase separation is identified to happen at @xmath215 where all the lowest energy states from different momentum sectors become nearly degenerate . in the dmrg calculation , the phase separation is indicated by a nonuniform boson density in the obtained ground state , which breaks the translational symmetry due to small perturbations from the cut - off of the hilbert space in dmrg . the phase separation occurs around @xmath214 as observed from dmrg . finally , the phase separation can also be studied in vmc by measuring trial energies for different boson densities and performing maxwell construction ( this is described in more detail , e.g. , in ref . vii for the 2d ring model ) . the tendency towards phase separation for large @xmath18 is expected since the ring term provides effective attraction between bosons , see appendix [ subapp : boundstate ] and ref . also , in the large @xmath18 limit , we can solve the ladder hamiltonian exactly and find phase separation this is shown in appendix [ subapp : konly ] . nevertheless , for intermediate @xmath18 the various phases discussed above are stabilized by the boson hopping . an obvious virtue of searching for the fingerprint of putative 2d gapless quantum phases in quasi-1d models is the relative numerical and analytic tractability of the latter . an important requirement of this approach is that the 2d quantum phase has singular correlations along surfaces in momentum space . in this case the number of 1d gapless modes present on an @xmath0-leg ladder will necessarily scale linearly with @xmath0 . while the particular fingerprint of the 2d quantum phase can already be present on the 2-leg ladder , as was the case for the dbl phase studied exhaustively in this paper , a compelling approach to 2d will certainly require analyzing models with larger @xmath0 . already when @xmath216 exact diagonalization studies become problematic since finding the ground states of boson or spin models with more than @xmath217 sites becomes virtually impossible . thus a @xmath218-leg ladder of length @xmath219 is already near the limit . dmrg is much more promising , and past studies on spin models reveal that convergence to the ground state is possible for lengths @xmath220 of order of a @xmath221 with @xmath222 , respectively . variational monte carlo for gutzwiller - type wavefunctions constructed as products of determinants or pfaffians as considered in this paper is possible for significantly larger @xmath0 , and equal time correlation functions can be computed with a fair degree of accuracy . but vmc is only as good as the variational wavefunction being employed , and the quality of the wavefunction is hard to assess in the absence of other more accurate methods . the ground - state energy of all physically reasonable hamiltonians is sensitive almost entirely to very short - range correlations , whereas for gapless quantum systems it is usually the longer range correlations which are necessary in order to distinguish between various competing phases . quantum states in 2d with gapless critical surfaces in momentum space are somewhat of an exception since the location of such surfaces is presumably due to short - range correlations in the signs and amplitudes of the wavefunction . but the precise singular structure on such surfaces reflects longer range correlations in the wavefunction . gauge theory@xcite seems to offer one of the few analytic approaches to access putative gapless spin - liquid type quantum phases in 2d that have no quasi - particle description . and for mean field states having a spinon fermi sea , a controlled inclusion of the gauge fluctuations is problematic , even in the simplest case of a compact @xmath223 gauge field . accounting for the instanton ( monopole ) events which reflect the compact nature of the gauge field is exceedingly difficult . even for a non - compact @xmath223 gauge field coupled to a fermi sea , while there does exist an rpa - type approach , @xcite it involves uncontrolled and worrisome approximations . but for the ladder systems , gapless fermions ( spinons ) coupled to a @xmath223 gauge field is eminently tractable , although this fact has been exploited rather infrequently.@xcite in 1d the gauge field has no transverse component and the bosonization method can be employed , leading to a gaussian effective field theory for the low energy excitations . this is another distinctive advantage of studying ladder systems relative to their 2d counterparts . one extension of this paper involves studying the boson ring hamiltonian on ladders with @xmath224 and larger . already for @xmath216 there are a number of new features that are not present on the 2-leg ladder . first , one can consider either periodic or anti - periodic boundary conditions for the bosons in the rung - direction , and it is quite plausible that the phase diagram and the presence / absence of the dbl phase will depend on this choice . second , while our search for a dbl phase with three gapless modes on the 2-leg ladder was unsuccessful due to instabilities of the dbl[2,2 ] variational state , it seems likely that for @xmath225 a dbl phase with more gapless modes than @xmath0 should be accessible . this is interesting since in such a case at least two of the 1d modes would have the same transverse momentum . for a general @xmath0-leg ladder one can construct variational states of the form dbl[@xmath226 , @xmath227 with integer @xmath228 satisfying @xmath229 ( with @xmath230 the number of partially filled bands for the @xmath231 partons , respectively ) . the number of 1d gapless modes in such a phase is @xmath232 , so that dbl[3,2 ] for @xmath216 , say , would have four 1d modes . if @xmath233 the @xmath8 fermion has only one band partially occupied , and assuming the band has @xmath23 , the corresponding variational wavefunction vanishes whenever two or more bosons occupy a rung . in this case of no - double rung occupancy , the determinant for the @xmath8 fermion can be viewed as a ( strictly ) 1d jordan - wigner string multiplying the @xmath7 determinant . whenever @xmath234 this is no longer the case , and the @xmath8 determinant would have a more subtle effect on the signs of the boson wavefunction . it would thus be desirable to access a dbl phase with @xmath234 . as detailed in appendix [ subapp : dbl22instab ] , the gauge theory suggested an instability of the dbl[2,2 ] state for @xmath235 due to a rather special nesting " condition present for @xmath236 . for @xmath237 this will not generally be the case so we expect that such dbl phases should be more easily accessible for @xmath238 . it would also be interesting to use the dmrg to access some dynamical information about the dbl , which should be possible at least for @xmath239 for @xmath240 the ladder model recovers the full symmetry of the 2d square lattice , and in future work it would be desirable to study how to approach this limit . it would be most interesting to search for possible 2d spin liquid phases with singular surfaces in momentum space in models possessing su(2 ) spin symmetry . recently , several authors @xcite have suggested that the putative spin liquid observed in @xmath1-(et)@xmath2cu@xmath2(cn)@xmath3 is of such character , and have proposed that a mean field state with a fermi surface of spinons is an appropriate starting point . variational energetics on the corresponding gutzwiller projected spinon fermi sea have been performed on the triangular lattice heisenberg antiferromagnet with a four - site cyclic ring exchange term , a model argued to be relevant for a mott insulator such as @xmath1-(et)@xmath2cu@xmath2(cn)@xmath3 that has a comparatively small charge gap . it should be possible to study the heisenberg plus ring exchange spin hamiltonian on the triangular strip to search for signatures of the proposed parent 2d spin liquid . in the absence of ring exchange this model is equivalent to the 1d heisenberg model with both first and second neighbor interactions , @xmath241 , and has been explored using dmrg in earlier work.@xcite the phase diagram as a function of @xmath242 appears to have two phases : a bethe - chain phase stable for small @xmath242 with one gapless mode and a fully gapped dimerized state for intermediate and large @xmath242 ; the gap decreases exponentially for large @xmath242 where we have nearly decoupled legs ( @xmath243 ) of the triangular ladder ( with interchain @xmath244 ) . with a 4-site ring exchange term ( coupling @xmath18 ) the triangular strip model is characterized by two dimensionless parameters , @xmath245 . are there any additional phases in this phase diagram ? the spin liquid phase on the triangular strip that descends from the ( putative ) 2d spinon fermi surface state should have 3 gapless modes ( 2 for spin , 2 for the two legs , minus one from the gauge constraint ) and corresponding incommensurate spin correlations . variational monte carlo together with a gauge theory analysis can provide a detailed characterization of this state , which could then be compared with dmrg , precisely as was done in this paper for the boson ring model . if present , one expects the spin liquid phase to appear for intermediate values of both @xmath242 and @xmath246 . in addition , one might study a half - filled hubbard model on the triangular strip , which should exhibit a metal insulator transition at intermediate coupling , @xmath247 . of particular interest is the nature of the quantum state just on the insulating side of the mott transition . if the mott transition is weakly first order , there will be substantial charge fluctuations and ring exchange interactions in this part of the phase diagram , and possibly a spin liquid phase , in addition to phases that have already been identified ( see refs . and references therein ) . what are the prospects of using ladders to approach non - fermi liquid phases of 2d itinerant electrons ? one complication is as follows . imagine a weak coupling hubbard model on the square lattice ( at densities well away from special commensurate values ) which has a conventional 2d fermi liquid ground state . on an @xmath0-leg ladder the free fermi points present for @xmath248 would be converted into luttinger liquids . the jump discontinuity in the momentum distribution function at each fermi point would be lost , but singularities would remain , characterized by some luttinger liquid exponents . moreover , the location of the singularities would still satisfy the luttinger sum rule . now imagine some strong coupling 2d electron hamiltonian with a non - fermi liquid phase that has a residual luttinger fermi surface but with @xmath249 , analogous to a 1d luttinger liquid . the corresponding @xmath0-leg ladder descendant would be qualitatively indistinguishable from the phase of the weak coupling hamiltonian . conversely , the presence of a luttinger - satisfying fermi surface on an @xmath0-leg ladder would not enable one to distinguish between the two different 2d phases , one a fermi liquid and the other not . on the other hand , the @xmath0-leg ladder descendant of a 2d non - fermi liquid ground state with momentum space singularities that violate the luttinger sum rule ( surfaces with the wrong " volume , or perhaps even arcs ) would have qualitatively distinct signatures . several recent papers@xcite have proposed such 2d non - fermi liquid phases , and it would be extremely interesting to find evidence for their ladder descendants . the wavefunction for one of these phases was constructed@xcite by taking the product of a free fermion determinant and the dbl wavefunction in eq . ( [ psidbl ] ) . this phase , which inherits the d - wave sign structure from the bosonic dbl wavefunction , was called a d - wave metal and would exhibit distinctive signatures if present on a ladder system . a possible hamiltonian that might possess the d - wave metal can be expressed by adding an itinerant - electron - ring " term to the usual square lattice @xmath66 model : @xmath250 with , @xmath251 where the sites @xmath252 are taken to run clockwise around an elementary square plaquettes and the summation runs over all packets . here we have defined an electron singlet creation operator : @xmath253 the ring term rotates a singlet on the @xmath254 diagonal into a singlet on the @xmath255 diagonal . it would be interesting to study this or other such strong coupling hamiltonians on the @xmath0-leg ladder . to conclude , in this paper we have initiated a study of @xmath0-leg ladder systems that are descendants of candidate 2d quantum phases with low - energy excitations residing on singular surfaces . motivated by one such proposal for the so - called dbl phases of un - condensed itinerant bosons,@xcite we have studied the 2-leg model with frustrating ring exchanges using exact numerical approaches . we have indeed found the dbl[2,1 ] ladder version arising prominently in the phase diagram . we have also searched for the dbl[2,2 ] version but from the gauge theory analysis concluded that it is likely unstable due to special kinematics on the 2-leg ladder and instead gives rise to a boson - paired phase with extended s - wave character in the pairs . this paired phase is in fact realized in our model , while the dbl theory gives us tools to understand its properties . while our focus has been on the dbl ideas , we have explored the full phase diagram of the specific ring model in fair detail and found also other strong - coupling phases such as the above s - wave paired phase and the d - wave paired phase . the latter is not directly accessible from the dbl theory but is characteristic of the binding tendencies in our ring terms , which eventually cause the bosons to phase - separate for large ring exchanges . we hope to pursue similar ideas in the @xmath225 ladders and also in su(2 ) spin and itinerant electronic models with ring exchanges , which are particularly exciting . we would like to thank l. balents , t. senthil , a. vishwanath for useful discussions . this work was supported by doe grant de - fg02 - 06er46305 ( dns ) , the national science foundation through grants dmr-0605696 ( dns ) and dmr-0529399 ( mpaf ) , and the a. p. sloan foundation ( oim ) . some of our numerical simulations were based on the alps libraries @xcite . a faithful formulation of the physical system in the slave particle approach eq . ( [ d1d2 ] ) is a compact u(1 ) lattice gauge theory . we set this up on the 2-leg ladder as follows . denote the vector potential components on the links of the two chains as @xmath256 and @xmath257 , and on the rungs as @xmath258 . in the euclidean path integral , denote the temporal components associated with the sites on the two chains as @xmath259 and @xmath260 . the action for the gauge field contains @xmath261 , @xmath262 , and @xmath263 . for each @xmath264 , the last term gives a 1 + 1d gauge action , and if the cosine is interpreted as a villain cosine , we can replace it with @xmath265 and treat @xmath266 as non - compact with no change in the results . choosing the gauge @xmath267 , the combination @xmath268 is massive , while the combination @xmath269 is massless . having described the gauge sector , we now consider the fermions @xmath7 and @xmath8 with the mean field bands as in fig . [ fig : bands ] and take the continuum limit using the bonding @xmath270 and antibonding @xmath271 fields near the corresponding fermi points @xmath272 . these fields couple to @xmath273 as to the usual gauge field , while the massive combination @xmath268 can be integrated out . the continuum hamiltonian density is @xmath274 where @xmath275 and @xmath276 are the gauge charges of the @xmath7 and @xmath8 respectively . in the dbl[2,2 ] case , there are both bonding and anti - bonding fields present for each species @xmath7 and @xmath8 . the fermi momenta satisfy @xmath277 , where @xmath27 is the original boson density per site . in the dbl[2,1 ] case , the @xmath8 fermions have only bonding fields . the allowed interactions contain general density - density terms , @xmath278 ~,\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath279 sum over all bands of all species , and also the following terms , @xmath280 \\ & + & f \left[\sum_p d_{1p}^{(0)\dagger } d_{2-p}^{(0)\dagger } d_{1-p}^{(\pi ) } d_{2p}^{(\pi ) } + \hc \right ] \\ & + & g \left[\sum_p d_{1p}^{(0)\dagger } d_{2-p}^{(\pi)\dagger } d_{1-p}^{(\pi ) } d_{2p}^{(0 ) } + \hc \right].\end{aligned}\ ] ] in the dbl[2,1 ] case , all terms that contain @xmath281 are absent . the above qed2-like theory can be analyzed perturbatively in the matter - gauge coupling , e.g. , in a systematic @xmath282 expansion , as was done in ref . for the spinon - gauge treatment of the 1d heisenberg spin chain . from such studies , we often use the following `` amperean '' rule of thumb : gauge interactions modify in a singular way processes that involve fermion fields with oppositely oriented group velocities . if the corresponding gauge currents are parallel ( antiparallel ) , such processes are enhanced ( suppressed ) , which originates from the attraction ( repulsion ) of currents in electromagnetism . as an example , @xmath283 has oppositely charged particles moving in opposite directions and producing parallel gauge currents , so this bilinear is expected to be enhanced compared to the mean field . we will see this explicitly in a solution of the 1d gauge theory by bosonization,@xcite which we pursue instead of the perturbative treatment . we also caution here and will see below that the different fermi velocities and the general allowed density - density interactions complicate the analysis significantly and can independently affect power laws , in addition to the above amperean rule for the gauge interaction effects . to bosonize,@xcite we write @xmath284 . \label{bosonize}\ ] ] here @xmath285 and @xmath286 are the conjugate phase and phonon fields for each band , while @xmath287 are klein factors , which we take to be hermitian operators that commute with the bosonic fields and anticommute among themselves . the kinetic hamiltonian density becomes @xmath288 .\end{aligned}\ ] ] the density - density interactions eq . ( [ h4fermi ] ) lead to generic terms of the form @xmath289 and @xmath290 , which are strictly marginal and affect power laws . the other interactions eq . ( [ h4fermii ] ) produce cosines and are written separately for the dbl[2,1 ] and dbl[2,2 ] below . we proceed in the euclidean path integral , choose the gauge @xmath291 and integrate out the @xmath292 . this renders the field @xmath293 massive and essentially pins it to zero . this is the suppression of the charge fluctuations in the gauge theory and realizes the microscopic constraints @xmath294 at long wavelengths . we then have two gapless modes left in the dbl[2,1 ] and three modes in the dbl[2,2 ] , if we can assume that the cosines corresponding to @xmath295 are irrelevant ( see below ) . to characterize the phases of the original hard core bosons , we examine the single boson correlations , the boson density and current correlations , and the pair boson correlations . the microscopic boson field is written as @xmath296 which we then express in terms of the continuum bosonized fields ( see separate treatments of the dbl[2,1 ] and dbl[2,2 ] below ) . for oppositely moving @xmath297 and @xmath298 , the @xmath161 part has a non - zero projection onto @xmath299 , and gapping out the @xmath299 by the gauge fluctuations enhances the corresponding contribution , in agreement with the amperean rule applied to the oppositely charged @xmath7 and @xmath8 . the fermion densities are @xmath300 the two lines in the expansion separate @xmath149 and @xmath154 parts , and all contributions with the same non - zero momentum are grouped together ( assuming generic distinct bonding and antibonding bands ) . we also consider the particle current on the rungs ( the definition below uses the gauge choice @xmath267 made early on ) : @xmath301 \\ & & = i \sum_{p , p ' } \ ! \left ( d_{\alpha p}^{(0)\dagger } d_{\alpha p'}^{(\pi ) } - d_{\alpha -p'}^{(\pi)\dagger } d_{\alpha -p}^{(0 ) } \right ) \ ! e^{-i(p k_{f\alpha}^{(0 ) } - p ' k_{f\alpha}^{(\pi ) } ) x } . \nonumber\end{aligned}\ ] ] the continuum expansion resembles that for the density at @xmath154 , but with opposite signs between @xmath302 and @xmath303 ; this will help to distinguish different phases in the analysis of instabilities , secs . [ subapp : dbl21instab ] , [ subapp : dbl22instab ] . bosonized expressions for the contributing bilinears will be given separately in the dbl[2,1 ] and dbl[2,2 ] cases . here we only note that when the constituent particle and hole are on the opposite sides , we again have non - zero projection onto @xmath299 , so the corresponding contribution is enhanced by the gauge fluctuations , in agreement with the amperean rule . finally , we consider the boson pair operator @xmath304 and expand in terms of the continuum fermion fields . assuming @xmath305 and @xmath306 are nearby , we characterize the pair by its center of mass coordinate @xmath307 along the chains ( this becomes the argument of the continuum fields ) and also by the internal pair structure . to this end , we collect different microscopic contributions that give rise to each term @xmath308 , where @xmath309 are combined band and fermi point indices . using short - hands @xmath310 $ ] , etc . , then @xmath304 contains @xmath311 \\ & & \times \left [ d_{2c}(x_1 , y_1 ) d_{2d}(x_2 , y_2 ) - d_{2c}(x_2 , y_2 ) d_{2d}(x_1 , y_1)\right ] \\ & = & d_{1a}(x ) d_{1b}(x ) d_{2c}(x ) d_{2d}(x ) \\ & & \times e^{i(k_{1ax } + k_{1bx } + k_{2cx } + k_{2dx } ) x } \phi_{1a , 1b , 2c , 2d}(y_1 , y_2 , \xi ) ~,\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath312 is the relative coordinate along the chains . the `` pair wavefunction '' is @xmath313 with @xmath314 and @xmath315 . in the above , we have chosen to characterize the pair by the momentum along the @xmath115-axis , but not by the momentum along the @xmath316-axis . on the 2-leg ladder , it is easier to visualize pairs by keeping track of both @xmath317 and @xmath318 . a few more words about this characterization on the 2-leg ladder . consider first a 2d setting , where we would write a contribution to a boson - pair @xmath319 by say @xmath320 where @xmath321 is some slowly varying operator of the center of mass coordinate @xmath322 , while @xmath323 is the internal pair function in the relative coordinate @xmath324 . specializing to a square lattice , we could then distinguish s - wave and d - wave ( more precisely , @xmath325 ) pairing by looking at the signs of @xmath326 . on the 2-leg ladder , however , separating out the transverse momentum @xmath5 as in 2d mixes things a little . specifically , a rotation of an @xmath327 pair into an @xmath328 pair can be also achieved by a `` translation '' @xmath329 . to avoid this , we instead define the pair - function by writing @xmath330 where @xmath331 and @xmath332 are the @xmath115-components of @xmath322 and @xmath324 respectively . we then characterize the pair wavefunction @xmath333 by the symmetry under interchanging the two legs of the ladder ( @xmath334 ) . when @xmath333 is even , we call it s - wave , since then the amplitudes for a pair sitting on a @xmath87 diagonal and a pair on a @xmath90 diagonal are the same . when @xmath333 is odd , we call it d - wave , since then the amplitudes for the two diagonals are opposite . the names `` s - wave '' and `` d - wave '' are used in anticipation that it is such local pictures of the pairs on the plaquettes that survive when we build towards 2d . returning to the dbl construction eq . ( [ phipair ] ) , we get s - wave or d - wave character depending whether @xmath335 is even or odd multiple of @xmath181 . we now specialize to the dbl[2,1 ] and dbl[2,2 ] cases in turn . upon bosonization , we start with three modes @xmath336 , @xmath337 , and @xmath338 ( we drop the bonding band label for the @xmath8 fermions ) . to proceed formally , we change to new canonical variables via @xmath339 the microscopic boson field @xmath340 has the following contributions listed by their momentum ( cf . eq . [ b ] ) : @xmath341 in each equation , the top and bottom signs are for @xmath342 and @xmath181 respectively . we omit the klein factors for simplicity since we will not need them here . also , we do not show combinations that can be obtained from the above by reversing all momenta . the microscopic boson density has contributions from both the @xmath7 and @xmath8 particles via eq . ( [ rhod ] ) , while the rung current has contributions only from the @xmath7 via eq . ( [ jrung ] ) ; we list all involved bilinears by their momentum : @xmath343 here we include the klein factors , but do not show combinations that can be obtained from the above by reversing all momenta . when we include gauge fluctuations , @xmath299 becomes massive , locking together @xmath344 and @xmath345 . integrating out @xmath346 , we obtain a generic harmonic liquid theory in terms of two coupled modes @xmath347 and @xmath348 . of the cosine interactions eq . ( [ h4fermii ] ) , we have only @xmath349 assuming this is irrelevant , we have a stable phase with two gapless modes . the potential instability due to this term is considered in sec . [ subapp : dbl21instab ] below . we do not write explicitly the full dbl[2,1 ] theory in terms of the @xmath347 and @xmath348 since even without the additional interactions from eq . ( [ h4fermi ] ) we have a general coupled harmonic system . we can still make some observations about the scaling dimensions of the contributions to the boson and the boson density or current operators . in the initial fermionic mean field , the bands @xmath350 are decoupled and the scaling dimensions of all contributions to the operators @xmath351 and @xmath352 are equal to 1 . the gauge fluctuations effectively set @xmath353 everywhere . consider first the contributions to @xmath351 . for arbitrary couplings in the full harmonic theory , we can argue that the scaling dimensions of the operators @xmath354 are at least @xmath355 , i.e. larger than the mean field value ( these have no explicit amperean enhancement ) . on the other hand , setting @xmath353 , the scaling dimensions of the operators @xmath356 can be lower than the mean field in accord with the amperean rule ; without further information , we can not say much in general , these scaling dimensions can be as low as zero . consider now the contributions to the boson density @xmath352 . the zero momentum contribution has scaling dimension @xmath355 . we can argue for arbitrary couplings in the theory that the @xmath46 contribution has scaling dimension larger than the mean field value @xmath355 . on the other hand , the @xmath357 , @xmath45 , and @xmath358 contributions can have smaller scaling dimensions upon setting @xmath353 , in accord with the amperean enhancement rule . we do not have general bounds on the scaling dimensions in the coupled two - mode system , although clearly these are not all independent . furthermore , in all of the preceding discussion , even if the gauge interaction acts to enhance some correlation , the short - range interactions in 1d can act to suppress the correlation , so the ultimate fate is not clear . as an illustration , we list all scaling dimensions in the case when the @xmath347 and @xmath348 modes are decoupled and characterized by the luttinger parameters @xmath359 and @xmath360 respectively [ our convention is that @xmath361 enters as @xmath362 in the action ] : @xmath363 & = & \frac{3}{8 } ( \frac{2}{3 g_\rho } + \frac{3 g_\rho}{2 } ) + \frac{1}{8 } ( \frac{2}{g_{- } } + \frac{g_{-}}{2 } ) \geq 1 ~ ; \\ \delta[b_{(k_{f1}^{(k_y ) } - k_{f2 } , k_y ) } ] & = & \frac{1}{8 } ( \frac{2}{g_\rho } + \frac{g_\rho}{2 } ) + \frac{1}{8 } ( \frac{2}{g_{- } } + \frac{g_{-}}{2 } ) \geq 1/2 ~ ; \\ % \delta[\rho_{b , ( 2k_{f1}^{(k_y ) } , 0 ) } ] & = & \frac{1}{4 } g_\rho + \frac{1}{4 } g_{- } ~ ; \\ \delta[\rho_{b , ( k_{f1}^{(0 ) } - k_{f1}^{(\pi ) } , \pi ) } ] & = & \frac{1}{2 } ( \frac{2}{g_{- } } + \frac{g_{-}}{2 } ) \geq 1 ~ ; \\ \delta[\rho_{b , ( k_{f1}^{(0 ) } + k_{f1}^{(\pi ) } , \pi ) } ] & = & \frac{1}{g_{- } } + \frac{1}{4 } g_\rho~ ; \\ \delta[\rho_{b , ( 2k_{f2 } , 0 ) } ] & = & g_\rho ~.\end{aligned}\ ] ] this example is loosely motivated by the observation in fig . [ fig : dbl_nq ] that the boson @xmath4 has roughly similar singularities at @xmath364 and @xmath365 . also , increasing the ring term @xmath18 and decreasing the interchain hopping @xmath50 drives the mean field bonding and antibonding bands to be more similar , suggesting such approximate decoupling of the two modes . continuing with this illustration , the boson correlators at @xmath366 are most enhanced when @xmath367 and @xmath368 giving @xmath369 = 1/2 $ ] ; with such couplings we also find mean - field - like @xmath370 = \delta[\rho_{b , ( k_{f1}^{(0 ) } - k_{f1}^{(\pi ) } , \pi ) } ] = \delta[\rho_{b , ( k_{f1}^{(0 ) } + k_{f1}^{(\pi ) } , \pi ) } ] = 1 $ ] , while @xmath371 = 2 $ ] . these numbers are qualitatively similar to the singularities detectable by eye in the density structure factor in fig . [ fig : dbl_nq ] , where we see some signatures at @xmath372 , @xmath373 , and no visible signature at @xmath358 . a more careful look at the dmrg data shows that the density singularities at @xmath372 are slightly stronger than the mean field , while the ones at @xmath373 are weaker ; this would suggest @xmath360 somewhat smaller than @xmath374 , which would also be consistent with the assumed irrelevance of the cosine interaction eq . ( [ 4ferme1 ] ) . however the dmrg boson correlator singularity has estimated scaling dimension somewhat smaller than the maximum @xmath375 in this illustration , so one should not take the above too literally . nevertheless , this example gives some sense to the strengths of the observed singularities in fig . [ fig : dbl_nq ] . finally , consider a boson pair operator ; we list contributing four - fermion combinations by their momentum along the chains : @xmath376 as explained earlier , we characterize each contribution by the internal pair wavefunction eq . ( [ phipair ] ) . again we have omitted the klein factors but can easily restore them when needed . for the zero momentum contribution we have @xmath377 this remains unchanged if we simultaneously change the @xmath316 coordinates of both bosons in the pair , e.g. , if we move a pair that lies entirely in chain 1 to chain 2 or if we turn a @xmath87 diagonal pair into a @xmath90 diagonal pair ; we call this s - wave . for the contribution at momentum @xmath378 we have @xmath379 \nonumber \\ & & = 4 \sin(k_{f2 } \xi ) \biggl ( \delta_{y_1 = y_2 } ( -1)^{y_1 } \sin\left[\frac{k_{f1}^{(0 ) } - k_{f1}^{(\pi)}}{2 } \xi \right ] \nonumber \\ & & \quad\quad\quad\quad\quad + i \delta_{y_1 \neq y_2 } ( -1)^{y_1 } \cos\left[\frac{k_{f1}^{(0 ) } - k_{f1}^{(\pi)}}{2 } \xi \right ] \biggr ) ~. \nonumber\end{aligned}\ ] ] this changes sign if we simultaneously change both @xmath316 coordinates in the pair . when @xmath21 and @xmath22 approach each other , the pairs straddling the two chains have larger amplitude . since the amplitude changes sign when we turn a @xmath87 diagonal pair into a @xmath90 diagonal pair , the internal structure of the pair has some d - wave character . the contribution at @xmath380 can be similarly characterized , but is omitted here . in the free fermion mean field all contributions have scaling dimension 2 . beyond the mean field , the d - wave contribution at @xmath381 is potentially enhanced by setting @xmath353 ; still , its scaling dimension is at least @xmath355 , while we can not say much about the scaling dimension of the s - wave contribution at zero momentum . in the above illustration with decoupled @xmath382 and @xmath383 modes , the d - wave pair has scaling dimension @xmath384 if we set @xmath385 , while the s - wave pair has scaling dimension is @xmath386 if we also set @xmath387 . the latter would be larger if we take smaller @xmath360 , in agreement with the observed dominance of the d - wave - like pair correlations in the dmrg fig . [ fig : dbl_pair ] oscillating at wavevector @xmath158 . let us ask what phase is obtained starting from the dbl[2,1 ] if the interaction eq . ( [ 4ferme1 ] ) is relevant [ the amperean rule does not point one way or another , but additional interactions from eq . ( [ h4fermi ] ) can make this happen ] . then @xmath388 is pinned , with two distinct cases depending on the sign of @xmath389 considered below , while @xmath390 fluctuates wildly . all contributions to @xmath351 contain @xmath390 in the exponent , so the single boson correlation function decays exponentially there is a charge gap to single boson excitations . the @xmath347 mode still remains gapless , and we have a single - mode harmonic fluid described by the parameter @xmath359 . the boson density shows power law correlations at zero momentum with scaling dimension 1 . the remaining particle - hole bilinears with power law correlations are at wavevector @xmath391 ( scaling dimension @xmath392 ) and at @xmath393 ( scaling dimension @xmath359 ) . the @xmath20 and @xmath394 parts do not distinguish qualitatively between the two possibilities @xmath395 and @xmath396 , while the @xmath397 part does distinguish . explicitly , the @xmath7 particle density is @xmath398 where we have omitted the zero momentum component and parts with exponentially vanishing correlations . on the other hand , the @xmath7 particle rung current is @xmath399 consider now two cases : : it follows that @xmath400 . in this case @xmath401 shows power law correlations at @xmath45 , while @xmath402 correlations are absent . : it follows that @xmath403 . in this case @xmath401 correlations at the above wavevector are absent , while @xmath402 shows power law at wavevector @xmath381 along the chains . let us finally consider the pair - boson correlations , which are also power law . putting together all contributions to @xmath404 , we have @xmath405 \\ + \sum_p \eta_1^{(0 ) } \eta_1^{(\pi ) } e^{i ( 2 \phi_\rho + p [ \theta_\rho + ( k_{f1}^{(0 ) } + k_{f1}^{(\pi ) } ) x ] ) } \phi_{1p(0 ) , 1p(\pi ) , 2r , 2l } ~,\end{aligned}\ ] ] where the appropriate @xmath406 are given in eqs . ( [ phiq0 ] ) and ( [ phiq2pirho ] ) . the pairs at zero momentum have dominant correlations with scaling dimension @xmath407 ; these have s - wave character as far as rotating diagonal bonds is concerned , but the amplitude details depend on the sign of @xmath389 . the pairs at @xmath381 have subdominant correlations with scaling dimension @xmath408 ; these have d - wave character for rotating the diagonal bonds and the details do not depend much on the sign of @xmath389 . summarizing , the resulting phase has a gap to single boson excitations , but has power law correlations for particle - hole and particle - particle composites . the dominant particle - hole composite has scaling dimension @xmath392 and either contributes to the density at wavevector @xmath188 if @xmath395 or to the rung current at @xmath158 if @xmath396 . the dominant particle - particle composite has scaling dimension @xmath407 and represents s - wave pairing at zero momentum . loosely speaking , we can describe this phase by saying that the bosons form s - wave - like pairs and these molecules in turn form a luttinger liquid . the current and/or density fluctuations occur at a wavelength equal to the mean inter - pair spacing along the ladder , as expected for a 1d luttinger liquid ( of pairs ) . the form of the particle - hole fluctuations across the rungs presumably reflects the internal pair structure in the two cases . in the dbl[2,2 ] case , we start with four bands , @xmath409 , and have four modes upon bosonization eq . ( [ bosonize ] ) . it is convenient to introduce the following canonical variables : @xmath410 with the same transformation for the @xmath161 variables . the cosine interactions eq . ( [ h4fermii ] ) are @xmath411 where @xmath412 . proceeding with the analysis as in the dbl[2,1 ] case , upon integrating out the gauge field , @xmath299 becomes massive . if by tweaking the strictly marginal interactions @xmath413 we could render the @xmath295 terms irrelevant , we would end up with a phase with three gapless modes . we call this possible phase dbl[2,2 ] , and it can be analyzed similarly to dbl[2,1 ] . for example , the mean field boson correlation in this phase would read @xmath414 \\ - \cos[(k_{f1}^{(k_{y1 } ) } + k_{f2}^{(k_{y2 } ) } ) x ] \bigr ) ~.\end{aligned}\ ] ] the first term in the brackets comes from @xmath415 and is expected to be enhanced by amperean attraction ( in the bosonization , this term contains @xmath299 in the exponent and is potentially enhanced upon setting @xmath416 ) . on the other hand , the second term in the brackets has no amperean enhancement . as emphasized earlier , besides the gauge fluctuations crudely captured by the amperean rule , other interactions can also change the scaling dimensions . interestingly , and this has important consequences explored below , @xmath417 and @xmath418 carry the same momentum @xmath419 , and also @xmath420 and @xmath421 carry the same momentum @xmath422 . in fact , josephson - like coupling between the first two `` bosonic modes '' is allowed and gives rise to the @xmath423 interaction in eq . ( [ h4fermii ] ) , while josephson coupling between the last two modes gives rise to the @xmath424 interaction . if the gauge physics is the dominant determining factor in the dbl[2,2 ] phase , we expect the state to be strongly unstable to these interactions , and we pursue this scenario below . on the other hand , if the dbl[2,2 ] were stabilized against the @xmath423 and @xmath424 by some density - density interactions dominating over the gauge physics , which is possible and interesting , we would have little intuition from the gauge theory perspective , and we do not pursue this possibility further . if the gauge physics dominates , it appears very likely that the @xmath423 and @xmath424 terms are relevant , as can be seen from their bosonized expressions upon setting @xmath353 ( in accord with the amperean rule ) . let us explore the resulting phase when @xmath423 and @xmath424 flow to large values and pin the fields @xmath425 and @xmath388 . four different possibilities depending on the signs of @xmath423 and @xmath424 are discussed below . in such a phase , the conjugate fields @xmath426 and @xmath390 fluctuate strongly and any operator containing these in the exponent will have only short - range correlations . thus , we conclude that the boson correlations decay exponentially , i.e. , there is a gap to single boson excitations . however , there is still one gapless mode @xmath347 , which we characterize with the luttinger parameter @xmath359 . consider fermion bilinears composed of a particle and a hole of the same species that enter density and current , eqs . ( [ rhod],[jrung ] ) . other than the @xmath427 densities @xmath428 , the following bilinears survive when @xmath429 get pinned : @xmath430 the particle density eq . ( [ rhod ] ) is , upon dropping the zero momentum part and setting @xmath416 , @xmath431 the particle current on the rungs eq . ( [ jrung ] ) is @xmath432 we now discuss different phases that can arise depending on the signs of the couplings @xmath423 and @xmath424 . we set @xmath433 , from which it follows @xmath434 ( the physical results are independent of the choice of @xmath435 ) . there are four cases : : it follows that @xmath436 , @xmath437 . in this case @xmath438 show power law correlations at @xmath188 with the scaling dimension @xmath392 , while @xmath439 correlations are absent . this is a natural phase coming from the microscopic gauge theory since the fluctuations of the @xmath7 and @xmath8 densities are in sync ; also , when we integrate out the massive gauge field @xmath268 early in the derivation of the continuum theory , we in fact generate such @xmath440 couplings . foretelling the analysis of the pairing correlations below , we propose that this is the s - wave - paired phase observed in the dmrg , sec . [ subsec : s - paired ] . : it follows that @xmath441 , @xmath442 . in this case @xmath443 show power law correlations at @xmath188 , while @xmath439 correlations are absent . the fluctuations of the @xmath7 and @xmath8 densities are out of sync . this phase with spatial modulation of the gauge charge is less natural coming from the lattice theory . it is in principle allowed if the bare couplings are finite , since then such modulation costs only finite energy density that can be offset by some other short - range interactions ; but the cost is large if the microscopic theory is at strong coupling as is usually the case in the slave particle treatments . for example , only the phase with @xmath438 can be realized by our wavefunctions . : it follows that @xmath444 . in this case @xmath445 correlations are absent , while @xmath446 show power low correlations at wavevector @xmath158 along the chains with scaling dimension @xmath392 . the @xmath7 and @xmath8 particle currents are in sync , so this phase is natural in the gauge theory ; for the original bosons , it would have enhanced current - current correlations but not density correlations . however , we have not observed such a phase in the ring model . : it follows that @xmath447 . in this case @xmath445 correlations are absent , while @xmath448 show power low correlations at wavevector @xmath158 along the chains . since the currents are out of sync , this phase is less natural coming from the microscopic gauge theory . let us consider boson pairs . first , for each @xmath449 there are four @xmath450 continuum field combinations that survive when the @xmath429 are pinned : @xmath451 } ~,\end{aligned}\ ] ] where in the last line the top / bottom sign corresponds to @xmath452 . constructing boson pairs via @xmath453 , the field @xmath454 disappears , and we also set @xmath353 . of the sixteen combinations , six carry zero momentum and all have the largest scaling dimension @xmath407 : @xmath455 the second and third lines will likely have smaller amplitudes , since @xmath425 and @xmath388 still fluctuate a little about the pinned values . we now examine the internal pairing structures . corresponding to the first line above , we have : @xmath456 the @xmath457 piece describes a pair formed by bosons in the same chain , while @xmath458 is a pair straddling the two chains . when say @xmath459 , which becomes more accurate as we decrease @xmath50 , the amplitudes for the latter are significantly stronger , i.e. , pairs are predominantly straddling the two chains . corresponding to the other zero - momentum combinations , we have @xmath460 if @xmath461 , this is independent of whether the two sites are on the same or different chains . on the other hand , if @xmath462 , this has opposite signs if the two sites are on the same versus different chains . all of the above pair - functions are even if both particles are moved perpendicular to the chains . in particular , @xmath87 and @xmath90 diagonal pairs have the same amplitudes . this is what we call s - wave pairing . putting together all zero momentum contributions to @xmath304 , we have @xmath463 ~,\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath464 and eventually drops out since both @xmath465 and @xmath466 are determined uniquely by the signs of the @xmath423 and @xmath424 couplings : @xmath467 , @xmath468 . note also that the contributions in the last four lines will have smaller amplitudes since @xmath469 and @xmath383 fluctuate a little around the pinned values . so the numerically largest contribution is given by the first line , while the smaller contributions from the last four lines will add to it with relative signs that depend on the signs of the @xmath423 and @xmath424 . summarizing , the dbl[2,2 ] is unstable towards a boson - paired phase with s - wave pairs carrying zero momentum . the resulting phase is roughly similar to the s - wave paired phase discussed as a possible instability of the dbl[2,1 ] in the preceding section , but some details are different . for example , coming out of the dbl[2,1 ] the amplitude for rung pairs vanishes , while out of the dbl[2,2 ] the rung pairs have large amplitudes comparable to those of the diagonal pairs . the latter is more similar to what the dmrg finds in the s - wave paired phase in the ring model , sec . [ subsec : s - paired ] . the prediction of dominant density correlations at wavevector @xmath188 also agrees with the dmrg . one additional prediction from the theory is that the pairing and density power laws have exponents that are inverse of each other . while the dmrg estimates for the present system sizes do not satisfy this exactly , there are likely strong finite size effects , and we would like to revisit this with larger systems . in the dbl construction eq . ( [ psidbl ] ) , we can view one determinant as affecting a generalized flux attachment or jordan - wigner ( jw ) transformation and view the other determinant as a ground state of the new jw fermions . in the dbl[2,1 ] case , the @xmath8 determinant is composed entirely from the bonding orbitals and becomes eq . ( [ detjw ] ) ; in particular , it prevents two bosons from being on the same rung . if we consider a hard - core boson model that prohibits double occupancy of rungs , then @xmath470 is the conventional 1d chain jw transformation on this ladder . as can be seen from the bottom panel in fig . [ fig : ed_results ] , our ring model in the dbl[2,1 ] phase appears , by its own dynamics , to strongly suppress double rung occupancy . the optimized power of @xmath153 in the trial wavefunction is also relatively small , making the @xmath471 factor look more like the jordan - wigner . finally , the @xmath7 determinant is composed of the bonding and antibonding orbitals , and its optimized power is relatively large though smaller than @xmath355 , which suggests that the jw fermions are not far from being free despite the large ring exchanges and the restricted rung occupancy . on the other hand , the dbl[2,2 ] would have some double occupancy of rungs and would be an example of a non - trivial jw , but unfortunately this phase appears to be unstable as described in sec . [ subapp : dbl22instab ] . the instability happens because of special kinematic conditions satisfied here , which allow direct josephson coupling and locking between enhanced boson modes . however , we expect that on @xmath0-leg ladders with @xmath225 , dbl phases will exist which can not be described by a conventional jordan - wigner approach . the pure ring model on the 2-leg ladder can be solved exactly . in the absence of boson hopping terms ( @xmath472 ) , the number of bosons on each rung , @xmath473 , is separately conserved . the number of bosons in each chain , @xmath474 or @xmath475 , is also conserved . any rung with @xmath476 or @xmath374 effectively breaks the system into decoupled pieces . consider an isolated segment of @xmath220 rungs with each @xmath477 . the ring hamiltonian is mapped to an xy spin chain by identifying boson configuration @xmath478 with spin up and @xmath479 with spin down : @xmath480 = k \sum_{x=1}^{l-1 } [ \tau^+(x ) \tau^{-}(x+1 ) + \hc ] ~,\ ] ] where @xmath481 are the usual spin-1/2 operators . this is readily solved by free fermions , and the ground - state energy is @xmath482 & = & -2 k \sum_{n=1}^{n_{\rm max } } \cos\frac{\pi n}{l+1 } \\ & = & -k \left ( \frac { \sin\frac{\pi ( 2 n_{\rm max } + 1)}{2(l+1 ) } } { \sin\frac{\pi}{2(l+1 ) } } - 1 \right ) ~,\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath483 if @xmath220 is even ( in this case @xmath484 ) , while @xmath485 if @xmath220 is odd ( @xmath486 ) . in either case , the ground - state energy per boson is minimized by making @xmath220 large , with the asymptotic behavior @xmath487}{l } = -\frac{2 k}{\pi } + \frac{k(1 - 2/\pi)}{l } + o(\frac{1}{l^2 } ) ~.\end{aligned}\ ] ] going back to the @xmath18-only model on an infinitely long ladder , we conclude that for arbitrary boson density @xmath488 , it is advantageous to phase - separate into an empty region and a half - filled region , since this minimizes the energy per particle ( @xmath489 can be treated by particle - hole transformation ) . the phase separation arises because the ring exchanges provide an effective attraction between particles see also the next section . note that the half - filled region itself is a highly correlated state of bosons . consider two bosons on an otherwise empty ladder . in the absence of the hoppings , @xmath490 , the states @xmath491 are degenerate ground states with energy @xmath492 . each can be viewed as a d - wave pair sitting on a plaquette . small boson hopping can be included perturbatively , and the pair starts to hop along the ladder with amplitude @xmath493 . in fact , inspired by similar considerations in the 1d @xmath66 model in ref . , the zero momentum bound state can be written exactly for the general @xmath494 model , and is created by @xmath495 ~.\end{aligned}\ ] ] this is defined for @xmath496 and has energy @xmath497 the pair `` size '' is @xmath498 $ ] . note that the bound state does not utilize any rung hopping . also , it competes with a free state of the two bosons where each moves independently and where the total energy is @xmath499 assuming @xmath500 throughout . as an example , for @xmath501 the bound state has lower energy than the state with two free bosons when @xmath502 = 2j$ ] , while @xmath503 = 2.74 j$ ] and @xmath504 increases with increasing @xmath50 . for a very small density of bosons , it is then natural to propose that for @xmath505 the bosons will form such tightly bound pairs which in turn form a luttinger liquid . this is the picture of the d - wave paired phase . as discussed in the preceding section , in the absence of the hopping ( or for very large @xmath18 ) , the system at any density phase - separates into empty and half - filled regions . this maximizes the ring energy per particle which attains @xmath506 and , in particular , wins over the asymptotic @xmath507 energy per particle in the paired state . bosons in the phase - separated half - filled region form a non - trivial quantum state and can hardly gain any kinetic energy once the hopping is included . in the boson - paired liquid , on the other hand , the pairs can move and gain some kinetic energy , which can then stabilize the system against phase separation . as a crude estimate , we ignore the kinetic energy in the phase - separated case and compare @xmath506 with eq . ( [ ebound ] ) divided per boson and find that the boson - paired liquid is more stable for @xmath508 . thus , there is a sizable window over which the boson - paired liquid is energetically preferable over the free boson liquid and is stable against phase separation . at very low density we also need to consider more - boson bound states that successively improve their ring energy but lose kinetic energy , and the corresponding liquids could intervene between the boson - paired one and the phase separation . however , it seems likely that a sizable region of the boson - paired phase will remain ; of course , it also competes with other phases such as dbl , as happens in fig . [ fig : phased2 ] for the filling @xmath62 studied by dmrg . let us sketch how one can construct trial wavefunctions for boson - paired liquids such as the d - wave paired phase at low densities described in the last section and in sec . [ subsec : d - paired ] and the s - wave paired phase described in sec . [ subsec : s - paired ] . let us denote the boson pair wavefunction as @xmath509 . for a given pairing - up of particles we could write @xmath510 times some jastrow - type factor for the center of mass coordinates @xmath511 , and then symmetrize this to obtain a bosonic wavefunction : @xmath512.\end{aligned}\ ] ] even if we take a simpler jastrow which is already a symmetric function of @xmath513 , the symmetrization of the pairing part gives a permanent which is prohibitive in numerical calculations . an alternative way to construct a symmetric bosonic wavefunction is @xmath514 \\ & \times & { \rm det}[r_1 , r_2 , r_3 , \dots ] \times { \rm jastrow}[r_1 , r_2 , r_3 , \dots ] ~.\end{aligned}\ ] ] here pairing is realized with the help of a pfaffian , which is a bcs wavefunction for spinless fermions and is specified by some pair function @xmath515 , while the total bosonic symmetry is recovered by multiplying by a second fermionic wavefunction taken for simplicity to be a slater determinant of some orbitals . note that for tightly bound pairs when @xmath516 and @xmath515 are very short ranged the two constructions are essentially similar for statistically significant configurations . the pfaffian and determinant are simple to work with in vmc , which allows one to construct trial wavefunctions also beyond the tightly bound limit . of course , both the spinless fermion pair function @xmath515 in the pfaffian and the orbitals in the determinant need to be judiciously chosen to realize the particular boson pair function @xmath516 . we should also note that such @xmath517 wavefunction does not necessarily represent a paired state of bosons , and one needs to measure the long - distance properties first . for example , we found that for a 1d chain a product of a slater determinant and a @xmath213-wave bcs wavefunction has qlro in the boson correlator when the @xmath213-pairing problem is at weak coupling , while the boson correlator becomes short - range as is needed for the boson - paired state only when the @xmath213-pairing problem is at strong coupling . consider for illustration low - density bosons in the @xmath501 limit . we can construct a d - wave paired state by taking @xmath518 in the pfaffian part , while combining the determinant and jastrow into one factor @xmath519 the power of the determinant is understood as @xmath520 . the fermion pair function is @xmath212-type and here requires that the two particles are on different chains ( which is why it is strictly appropriate only in the @xmath501 limit ) . for an isolated pair of bosons , this indeed gives the exact d - wave pair of sec . [ subapp : boundstate ] when @xmath521 . we use this wavefunction with two variational parameters @xmath332 and @xmath68 to connect with the dmrg results at @xmath62 in sec . [ subsec : d - paired ] . one could construct a similar boson - paired state by taking the pfaffian factor to be a solution of a general spinless bcs problem with @xmath212 pairing on the ladder ; this would allow more freedom ( e.g. , if we want to study @xmath522 ) , but has not been explored . we have also tried the @xmath517 construction for the s - wave paired phase of sec . [ subsec : s - paired ] . here we take the determinant to contain both bonding and antibonding orbitals , which resembles the @xmath523 in the dbl[2,1 ] or dbl[2,2 ] containing @xmath7 fermions with dominant hopping along the chains ( in particular , the @xmath7 bonding and antibonding bands become equally populated in the @xmath501 limit ) . we take the pfaffian to be that for a @xmath213-wave spinless bcs problem on the ladder , which resembles @xmath8 fermions trying to enter the dbl[2,2 ] regime but becoming paired . there are many parameters here such as the @xmath8 intra- and inter - chain hoppings and @xmath213 pairings . we have found that the boson s - paired phase from fig . [ fig : phased1 ] and sec . [ subsec : s - paired ] is reproduced roughly when the @xmath8 bcs problem is in the weak - pairing regime for both the bonding and antibonding bands and has predominant inter - chain pairing . note that the above @xmath524 motivation of the @xmath517 content is very loose and is hardly inspired by any gauge theory thinking but rather found by trial and error . we also mention that there are likely other ways to construct such paired boson phases . for example , coming from 2d where paired bosons can form a true condensate , one natural construction to explore could be @xmath525 . nevertheless , the @xmath517 that we studied gives us complementary confidence in the dmrg identification of the s - wave paired phase . Abstract:

Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.

Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered . Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video . Paper: a subset @xmath3 of the plane @xmath4 is said to _ inscribe a square _ if it contains the four vertices of a square of positive sidelength . note that despite the terminology , we do not require the solid square with these four vertices to lie in the `` interior '' of @xmath3 ( indeed we do not require @xmath3 to even have an interior ) ; see figure [ inscribed ] . [ t ] the following conjecture of toeplitz @xcite is usually referred to as the _ square peg problem _ or _ inscribed square problem _ : [ spp]@xcite let @xmath5 be a simple closed curve . then @xmath6 inscribes a square . in this paper , a curve @xmath7 denotes a continuous map from a domain @xmath8 that is either an interval @xmath9 $ ] or a circle @xmath10 to a manifold @xmath11 , with the curve being called _ closed _ in the latter case . such a curve is called _ simple _ if @xmath12 is injective . a recent survey on this problem , together with an extensive list of further references may be found in @xcite ; the brief summary below is drawn from that survey . thanks to arguments of a homological nature , the above conjecture is known assuming that the curve @xmath12 is sufficiently regular . for instance : * toeplitz @xcite claimed conjecture [ spp ] for convex curves , but did not publish a proof . this case was partially resolved by emch @xcite , @xcite and then fully resolved in @xcite , @xcite ; this case can also be deduced from the `` table theorem '' of fenn @xcite . * hebbert @xcite gave a proof of conjecture [ spp ] for quadrilaterals . a proof of conjecture [ spp ] for arbitrary polygons was given in @xcite ; see also @xcite , @xcite for some further `` discretisations '' of the conjecture . see @xcite for some computer - assisted quantitative bounds on one such discretisation . * emch @xcite established conjecture [ spp ] for piecewise analytic curves . an alternate proof of the analytic case was obtained by jerrard @xcite . * schnirelman @xcite ( see also @xcite ) established conjecture [ spp ] for continuously twice differentiable curves ( and in fact was also able to treat some curves outside this class ) . an alternate argument treating continuously twice differentiable curves ( obeying an additional technical geometric condition ) was obtained by makeev @xcite . * nielsen and wright @xcite established conjecture [ spp ] for curves symmetric around a line or point . * stromquist @xcite established conjecture [ spp ] for locally monotone curves . an alternate treatment of this case was given in @xcite . * cantarella , denne , mccleary @xcite established conjecture [ spp ] for @xmath13 curves , and also for bounded curvature curves without cusps . * matschke @xcite established conjecture [ spp ] for an open dense class of curves ( namely , curves that did not contain small trapezoids of a certain form ) , as well as curves that were contained in annuli in which the ratio between the outer and inner radius is at most @xmath14 . one can broadly classify the methods of proof in the above positive results as being `` homological '' in nature , in that they use algebraic topology tools such as intersection homology , bordism , equivariant obstruction theory , or more elementary parity arguments counting the number of intersections between curves . in fact , many of these proofs establish the stronger claim that ( under some suitable genericity and regularity hypotheses ) there are an _ odd _ number of squares with vertices lying on the curve . it is tempting to attack the general case of conjecture [ spp ] by approximating the curve @xmath12 by a curve in one of the above classes , applying an existing result to produce squares with vertices on the approximating curve , and then taking limits somehow ( e.g. by a compactness argument ) . however , in the absence of some additional regularity hypothesis on the curve , it could conceivably happen that the approximating inscribed squares degenerate to a point in the limit . even if the original curve is smooth except for a single singular point , one could imagine that all squares in the approximating curves concentrate into that singular point in the limit . this scenario of squares degenerating to a point is the primary reason for the inability to remove the regularity hypotheses in the known positive results on the problem . in this paper we propose to modify the homological approach to the inscribed square problem , by focusing not only on the parity of intersections between various geometric objects associated to the curve @xmath12 , but also on bounding certain integrals associated to these curves . as with previous works , one requires a certain amount of regularity ( such as rectifiability , lipschitz continuity , or piecewise linearity ) on the curves in order to initially define these integrals ; but the integrals enjoy more stability properties under limits than intersection numbers , and thus may offer a route to establish more cases of conjecture [ spp ] . as an instance of this , we give the following positive result towards this conjecture , which appears to be new . for any @xmath15 and any function @xmath16 , we define the _ graph _ @xmath17 to be the function @xmath18 , so in particular @xmath19 is the set @xmath20 such a function @xmath21 is said to be _ @xmath22-lipschitz _ for some @xmath23 if one has @xmath24 for all @xmath25 . similarly if @xmath21 is defined on a circle @xmath10 rather than an interval @xmath8 ( using the usual riemannian metric on @xmath10 ) . [ main ] let @xmath9 $ ] be an interval , and let @xmath26 \to { \mathbb{r}}$ ] be @xmath27-lipschitz functions for some @xmath28 . suppose also that @xmath29 , and @xmath30 for all @xmath31 . then the set @xmath32 ) \cup \mathtt{graph}_g([t_0,t_1])\ ] ] inscribes a square . in other words , conjecture [ spp ] holds for curves that traverse two lipschitz graphs , as long as the lipschitz constants are strictly less than one . the condition of having lipschitz constant less than one is related to the property of being locally monotone , as considered in the references @xcite , @xcite above ; however , due to a potentially unbounded amount of oscillation at the endpoints @xmath33 and @xmath34 , the sets in theorem [ main ] are not necessarily locally monotone at the endpoints , and so the results in @xcite , @xcite do not seem to directly imply theorem [ main ] . similarly for the other existing positive results on the square peg problem . we prove theorem [ main ] in section [ pos - sec ] . a key concept in the proof will be the notion of the ( signed ) area @xmath35 under a rectifiable curve @xmath12 ; see definition [ area - def ] . this area can be used to construct a `` conserved integral of motion '' when one traverses the vertices of a continuous family of squares ; see lemma [ conserv ] . theorem [ main ] will then follow by applying the contraction mapping theorem to create such a continuous family of squares to which the conservation law can be applied , and then invoking the jordan curve theorem to obtain a contradiction . the hypothesis of @xmath36 having lipschitz constant less than one is crucially used to ensure that the curve one is applying the jordan curve theorem to is simple ; see proposition [ pro ] . without the hypothesis of small lipschitz constant , the jordan curve theorem is no longer available , and we do not know how to adapt the argument to prove conjecture [ spp ] in full generality . however , in later sections of the paper we present some related variants of conjecture [ spp ] which seem easier to attack by this method , including a periodic version ( conjecture [ pspp ] ) , an area inequality version ( conjecture [ area - ineq ] ) , and a combinatorial version ( conjecture [ adf ] ) . in contrast to the original square problem , the periodic version remains open even when the curves are piecewise linear ( and this case seems to contain most of the essential difficulties of the problem ) . conjecture [ area - ineq ] is the strongest of the new conjectures in this paper , implying all the other conjectures stated here except for the original conjecture [ spp ] ( although it would imply some new cases of that conjecture ) . conjecture [ adf ] is a simplified version of conjecture [ area - ineq ] that is an almost purely combinatorial claim regarding the sign patterns of triple sums @xmath1 of numbers @xmath37 drawn from finite sets of real numbers . it seems to be a particularly tractable `` toy model '' for the original problem , though the author was not able to fully resolve it . the logical chain of dependencies between the conjectures discussed in this paper is summarised as follows : @xmath38 the author is supported by nsf grant dms-1266164 , the james and carol collins chair , and by a simons investigator award . given a subset @xmath39 of a vector space @xmath40 and a shift @xmath41 , we define the translates @xmath42 given two subsets @xmath43 in a metric space @xmath44 , we define the distance @xmath45 we use the asymptotic notation @xmath46 to denote an estimate of the form @xmath47 for some implied constant @xmath22 ; in many cases we will explicitly allow the implied constant @xmath22 to depend on some of the ambient parameters . if @xmath48 is an asymptotic parameter going to infinity , we use @xmath49 to denote an estimate of the form @xmath50 where @xmath51 is a quantity depending on @xmath48 ( and possibly on other ambient parameters ) that goes to zero as @xmath52 ( holding all other parameters fixed ) . we will use the language of singular homology ( on smooth manifolds ) in this paper , thus for instance a @xmath53-chain in a manifold @xmath11 is a formal integer linear combination of curves @xmath54 , and a @xmath53-cycle is a @xmath53-chain that is zero boundary . two @xmath55-cycles are homologous if they differ by a @xmath55-boundary , that is to say the boundary @xmath56 of a @xmath57-cycle . we integrate ( continuous ) @xmath55-forms on ( piecewise linear ) @xmath55-chains in the usual fashion , for instance if @xmath58 is a @xmath53-chain that is an integer linear combination of curves @xmath59 , and @xmath60 is a @xmath53-form , then @xmath61 . see for instance @xcite for the formal definitions of these concepts and their basic properties . we will not use particularly advanced facts from singular homology ; perhaps the most important fact we will use is the claim that if two ( piecewise linear ) cycles @xmath62 are homologous and intersect a ( flat ) submanifold @xmath40 transversely , then their intersections @xmath63 , @xmath64 are homologous cycles in @xmath40 . we now prove theorem [ main ] . it will be convenient to give a name to the space of all squares . [ sqdef ] we define @xmath65 to be the set of all quadruples of vertices of squares in @xmath4 traversed in anticlockwise order ; more explicitly , we have @xmath66 by abuse of notation we refer to elements of @xmath67 as ( non - degenerate ) squares . thus we see that a set @xmath68 inscribes a square if and only if @xmath69 intersects @xmath67 . we also form the closure @xmath70 in which the sidelength of the square is allowed to degenerate to zero ; this is a four - dimensional linear subspace of @xmath71 . a quadruple @xmath72 of curves @xmath73 \to { \mathbb{r}}^2 $ ] is said to _ traverse squares _ if one has @xmath74 for all @xmath75 $ ] ; note that we allow the square traversed to degenerate to a point . equivalently , @xmath72 traverses squares if and only if there exist functions @xmath76 \to { \mathbb{r}}^2 $ ] such that @xmath77 we will also need the notion of the area under a ( rectifiable ) curve : [ area - def ] let @xmath78 \to { \mathbb{r}}^2 $ ] be a continuous rectifiable curve , and write @xmath79 for @xmath75 $ ] , thus @xmath80 \to { \mathbb{r}}$ ] are continuous functions of bounded variation . area under @xmath12 _ , denoted by @xmath35 , is defined to be the real number @xmath81 where the integral on the right - hand side is in the riemann - stieltjes sense . of course , if @xmath12 is piecewise smooth , this definition of @xmath35 agrees with the usual definition of @xmath35 as the integral of the @xmath53-form @xmath82 on @xmath12 ( now viewed as a @xmath53-chain ) . [ integ ] if @xmath83 \to { \mathbb{r}}$ ] is continuous of bounded variation , then the area under the curve @xmath84 is just the usual riemann integral : @xmath85 in particular , if @xmath21 is positive , @xmath86 is the area of the region bounded by @xmath84 , the real axis , and the vertical lines @xmath87 . if @xmath12 is not a graph , the area under @xmath12 is more complicated ; see figure [ area ] . [ t ] , where @xmath88 is the area of the region @xmath89 , and similarly for @xmath90 , @xmath91 , @xmath92 ; the weights @xmath93 attached to @xmath94 here are the winding numbers of the spiral together with the horizontal and vertical line segments used to close up the curve.,title="fig:",width=480 ] [ repo ] if @xmath12 is a simple closed anticlockwise rectifiable curve , then by the jordan curve theorem it encloses a bounded open region @xmath95 , and we claim that the area under the curve @xmath12 is then equal to the negative of the lebesgue measure of @xmath95 . in the case that @xmath12 is a polygonal path , this claim is clear from stokes theorem : @xmath96 the general case then follows by approximating the simple closed anticlockwise curve @xmath12 as the uniform limit of simple closed anticlockwise polygonal paths @xmath97 , noting ( as can be seen for instance by using the characterisation of @xmath95 as the set of points @xmath98 where the winding number of @xmath12 around @xmath98 is equal to @xmath53 ) that the interiors @xmath99 of @xmath97 converge in the hausdorff sense to @xmath95 . in particular , if @xmath12 is a simple closed rectifiable curve ( of either orientation ) , then the area @xmath35 under @xmath12 is necessarily non - zero , with the sign of this area determined by the orientation of @xmath12 . the relevance of this area concept to the square peg problem lies in the following simple identity . [ conserv ] let @xmath100 \to { \mathbb{r}}^2 $ ] be rectifiable curves such that @xmath72 traverses squares ( as defined in definition [ sqdef ] ) . then we have the identity @xmath101 where the functions @xmath76 \to { \mathbb{r}}$ ] are as in definition [ sqdef ] . from definition [ sqdef ] and definition [ area - def ] we have @xmath102 and hence after some canceling we may write the left - hand side of as @xmath103 writing @xmath104 and @xmath105 , we obtain the claim . geometrically , this conserved integral reflects the following elementary fact : if a square with vertices @xmath106 ( traversed in anticlockwise order ) and sidelength @xmath107 is deformed to a nearby square with vertices @xmath108 , @xmath109 , @xmath110,@xmath111 and sidelength @xmath112 , then the difference of the areas of the two quadrilaterals with vertices @xmath113 and @xmath114 respectively add up to exactly half the difference between the areas @xmath115 , @xmath116 of the two squares ( see figure [ diffi ] ) . [ t ] .,title="fig:",width=480 ] [ homog ] one can interpret lemma [ conserv ] in the language of differential forms as follows . for @xmath117 , let @xmath118 be the @xmath119 coordinate projection , then we can pull back the @xmath53-form @xmath82 on @xmath4 by @xmath120 to create a @xmath53-form @xmath121 on the linear @xmath122-manifold @xmath123 . then the identity may be rewritten as @xmath124 where @xmath125 is the @xmath126-form that takes a square @xmath127 to the quantity @xmath128 , and @xmath129 denotes the exterior derivative . in particular , the @xmath53-form @xmath130 is exact . now we prove theorem [ main ] . let @xmath9 , f , g,{\varepsilon}$ ] be as in that theorem . it is convenient to extend the functions @xmath131 \to { \mathbb{r}}$ ] by constants to the whole real line @xmath132 to form extended functions @xmath133 . that is to say , we define @xmath134 for @xmath135 , @xmath136 for all @xmath137 , and @xmath138 and @xmath139 for @xmath140 . clearly @xmath141 continue to be @xmath27-lipschitz and of bounded variation . for any @xmath142 , the map @xmath143 is a strict contraction on @xmath4 ( with the usual euclidean metric ) with contraction constant at most @xmath144 . hence , by the contraction mapping theorem , there is a unique solution @xmath145 to the fixed point equation @xmath146 furthermore , @xmath147 and @xmath148 depend in a lipschitz fashion on @xmath149 ( the lipschitz constant can be as large as @xmath150 , but this will not concern us ) . if we then define the functions @xmath151 \to { \mathbb{r}}$ ] by @xmath152 for all @xmath142 , then @xmath72 are a quadruple of lipschitz ( and thus locally rectifiable ) curves that traverse squares . from , , , we have @xmath153 for all @xmath142 . in particular , @xmath154 take values in @xmath155 , @xmath155 , and @xmath156 respectively ; see figure [ gammafig ] . as for @xmath157 , we can use the hypothesis of small lipschitz constant to establish the following key fact : [ t ] , @xmath158 , and @xmath159 . ( in some cases , @xmath160 may lie on the enlargements @xmath161 of @xmath84 , @xmath162 , which are not shown here.),title="fig:",width=480 ] [ pro ] the curve @xmath163 \to { \mathbb{r}}^2 $ ] is simple . suppose that @xmath164 $ ] are such that @xmath165 , thus by we have @xmath166 applying the second coordinate of , we can write as @xmath167 which on combining with yields the identity @xmath168 on the other hand , by applying the first coordinate of , we can write instead as @xmath169 which on combining with yields the identity @xmath170 but as @xmath171 have lipschitz constant less than one , the identities , can only simultaneously hold if @xmath172 and @xmath173 , which by implies that @xmath174 , and so @xmath157 is simple as claimed . geometrically , proposition [ pro ] can be interpreted as the assertion that if one rotates @xmath175 by @xmath176 clockwise around some point @xmath177 , then the resulting curve can intersect @xmath178 at most once ( in fact the two curves intersect exactly once ) . when @xmath179 or @xmath180 , we have @xmath181 as the unique fixed point of . applying lemma [ conserv ] , we conclude the identity @xmath182 by and example [ integ ] we have @xmath183 from and a change of variables @xmath184 we also have @xmath185 note that @xmath186 may temporarily range outside of the interval @xmath9 $ ] ( or be temporarily decreasing instead of increasing ) as @xmath149 increases from @xmath187 to @xmath188 , but the net contributions of such excursions cancel out ( by the fundamental theorem of calculus , or equivalently because @xmath53-forms on a line are automatically exact ) . similarly , from and the change of variables @xmath189 we have @xmath190 thus from we must have @xmath191 or equivalently @xmath192 where @xmath193 denotes the concatenation of @xmath157 with the reversal of the graph @xmath162 . this is a closed curve , hence by example [ repo ] this curve can not be simple . since @xmath157 and @xmath162 are separately simple ( the former thanks to proposition [ pro ] ) , we conclude that there exists @xmath194 such that @xmath195 in particular , @xmath196 all lie in the set . since @xmath197 , we see from that @xmath147 and @xmath148 can not both vanish ; thus @xmath198 lie in @xmath67 , and the claim follows . it is instructive to compare the above argument with the following homological argument , which requires additional regularity hypotheses on @xmath36 at the boundary points @xmath199 . namely , suppose in addition to the hypotheses of theorem [ main ] that @xmath36 are differentiable at @xmath199 with @xmath200 and @xmath201 ; this corresponds the curve being `` locally monotone '' in the sense of @xcite or @xcite , even at the endpoints @xmath33 and @xmath34 . a local analysis then reveals that the curve @xmath202 defined above lies in the interior of for @xmath149 close to @xmath187 , and in the exterior of for @xmath149 close to @xmath188 , and so it must cross at some point ; indeed , if all intersections were transversal , then it must cross this curve an odd number of times . ( actually , it is not difficult to use the lipschitz hypotheses to show that this curve can only cross @xmath162 and not @xmath84 . ) in contrast , the integral argument based on the conserved integral does not give any information on the parity of crossings ( indeed , if @xmath36 are not differentiable at the endpoints , one could conceivably have an infinite number of transverse crossings near the endpoints @xmath33 and @xmath34 ) , but do not require the functions @xmath36 to be so regular at the endpoints @xmath199 that a local analysis is possible there . we now discuss periodic versions of the square peg problem , in which the plane @xmath4 is replaced by the cylinder @xmath203 for some fixed period @xmath204 . there is an obvious projection map @xmath205 from the plane to the cylinder , which induces a projection @xmath206 ; we let @xmath207 and @xmath208 be the images of @xmath67 and @xmath123 under this latter projection . more explicitly , we have @xmath209 and @xmath210 where we define the sum @xmath211 of an element @xmath212 and a real number @xmath213 in the obvious fashion . again note that @xmath208 is a flat @xmath122-manifold in @xmath214 . as before , a subset @xmath3 of @xmath215 is said to _ inscribe a square _ if @xmath69 intersects @xmath207 . we give @xmath215 and @xmath214 the usual flat riemannian metric , which is then inherited by @xmath207 and @xmath208 . we have a standard closed curve @xmath216 in @xmath215 defined by @xmath217 one can think of @xmath218 homologically as a @xmath53-cycle generating the first homology of @xmath215 . any other closed curve @xmath219 will be homologous to @xmath218 if and only if it takes the form @xmath220 for some continuous lift @xmath221 of @xmath12 that obeys the equivariance property @xmath222 for all @xmath142 . amongst all the curves @xmath12 in @xmath215 , we isolate the _ polygonal curves _ , in which @xmath12 is piecewise linear ( possibly after reparameterisation ) , that is to say @xmath12 is the concatenation of finitely many line segments in @xmath215 . we now introduce the following variant of conjecture [ spp ] . [ pspp ] let @xmath223 , and let @xmath224 be simple curves in @xmath215 homologous to @xmath218 . suppose also that the sets @xmath225 and @xmath226 are disjoint . then @xmath227 inscribes a square . in contrast to conjecture [ spp ] , we do not know the answer to conjecture [ pspp ] even when @xmath228 are smooth or piecewise polygonal ( and we in fact suspect that resolving this case would soon resolve conjecture [ pspp ] in full generality , in analogy to corollary [ poly ] below ) . this is because the intersection numbers produced by homological arguments become _ even _ in the periodic setting , rather than _ odd_. of course , by rescaling we could normalise @xmath229 without loss of generality in conjecture [ pspp ] if desired , but we find it preferable to not enforce this normalisation . we are able to relate conjecture [ spp ] to a special case of conjecture [ pspp ] . to state this special case , we need a further definition : let @xmath223 . a closed subset @xmath3 of @xmath215 is said to _ inscribe infinitesimal squares _ if there exists a sequence of squares @xmath230 in @xmath207 converging to a degenerate square @xmath231 for some @xmath232 , such that @xmath233 as @xmath52 . note that the property of infinitesimally inscribing squares is a purely local property : to show that a set @xmath3 does not infinitesimally inscribe squares , it suffices to show that for every @xmath234 , there is a set @xmath235 that agrees with @xmath3 in a neighbourhood of @xmath98 that does not infinitesimally inscribe squares . we now give two examples of sets with the property of not inscribing infinitesimal squares . [ inscribe ] let @xmath236 be @xmath22-lipschitz functions for some @xmath237 , such that the graphs @xmath238 for @xmath239 are all disjoint . then the set @xmath240 does not inscribe infinitesimal squares . by the local nature of infinitesimally inscribing squares , it suffices to show that each @xmath238 does not infinitesimally inscribe squares . suppose for contradiction that there was some @xmath239 and a sequence of squares with @xmath241 , @xmath242 , and all vertices staying within @xmath243 of @xmath238 . as @xmath244 is @xmath22-lipschitz constant , this implies that the eight points @xmath245 , @xmath246 , @xmath247 , @xmath248 all lie in the double sector @xmath249 . however , the arguments of these eight points ( viewed as complex numbers ) form a coset of the eighth roots of unity , while the double sector omits all the complex numbers of argument in @xmath250 $ ] if @xmath48 is large enough ; but these two facts are in contradiction . if one rotates the standard unit square @xmath251 ^ 2 $ ] by @xmath252 , one obtains a square with the property that all its sides and diagonals have slope between @xmath253 and @xmath254 ; in particular , the vertices of this square can be traversed by the graph of a @xmath254-lipschitz function . gluing together infinitely many rescaled copies of this function , it is not difficult to show that the condition @xmath255 in lemma [ inscribe ] can not be improved . [ pat ] let @xmath256 be disjoint simple polygonal paths in @xmath4 ( either open or closed ) . then @xmath257 does not infinitesimally inscribe squares . again it suffices to verify that a single @xmath258 does not inscribe squares . suppose for contradiction that there was a sequence of squares with vertices with @xmath259 , @xmath242 , and all vertices staying within @xmath243 of @xmath258 . we can translate so that @xmath260 . the origin @xmath261 is either a vertex on the path @xmath258 or an interior point of an edge . suppose first that @xmath261 is an interior point of an edge , which then lies on some line @xmath262 . then for @xmath48 large enough , all four vertices stay within @xmath263 of this line . applying a suitable translation and rescaling , we can then obtain another family of squares of unit length , whose vertices are bounded and stay within @xmath264 of @xmath262 . using compactness to extract a limit , we obtain a unit square with all four vertices on @xmath262 , which is absurd . now suppose that @xmath261 is a vertex of @xmath258 , which we may take to be the origin . this origin is the meeting point of two edges of @xmath258 that lie on two distinct lines @xmath265 passing through the origin . if ( after passing through a subsequence ) all four vertices lie within @xmath263 of @xmath266 , then by rescaling and taking limits as before we obtain a unit square with all four vertices on @xmath266 , which is absurd ; similarly if all four vertices lie within @xmath263 of @xmath267 . thus we must have at least one vertex within @xmath263 of @xmath266 and another within @xmath263 of @xmath267 , which forces the entire square to lie within @xmath268 of the origin . rescaling and taking limits again , we now obtain a unit square with all four vertices on the union @xmath269 of the two intersecting lines @xmath265 , which is again absurd regardless of what angle @xmath266 and @xmath267 make with each other . for an example of a curve that does infinitesimally inscribe squares , one can consider any curve that has the local behaviour of a cusp such as @xmath270 . we now isolate a special case of conjecture [ pspp ] : [ pspps ] conjecture [ pspp ] is true under the additional hypothesis that @xmath227 does not inscribe infinitesimal squares . the main result of this section is then [ imp ] conjecture [ spp ] implies conjecture [ pspps ] . in particular ( by lemma [ pat ] ) , conjecture [ spp ] implies the special case of conjecture [ pspp ] when the curves @xmath228 are polygonal paths . to put it another way , if one wished to disprove conjecture [ spp ] , it would suffice to produce a union @xmath271 of two disjoint periodic curves which did not inscribe any squares or infinitesimal squares . proposition [ imp ] is then an immediate consequences of the following proposition : [ period ] let @xmath3 be a compact subset of @xmath215 for some @xmath204 , and let @xmath272 be its lift to @xmath4 . for every large natural number @xmath48 , let @xmath273 denote the map in the complex plane , which `` gently pinches '' the periodic set to a bounded set in a manner that almost preserves squares . one could also use other maps than @xmath274 here as long as they obeyed the above - mentioned qualitative features of approximate conformality and mapping periodic sets to bounded sets . ] @xmath275 then at least one of the following three statements hold . * @xmath3 inscribes a square . * @xmath3 inscribes infinitesimal squares . * for sufficiently large @xmath48 , @xmath276 does not inscribe a square . indeed , to establish conjecture [ pspps ] assuming conjecture [ spp ] , one simply applies proposition [ period ] to the set @xmath277 ; the conclusion ( ii ) is ruled out by hypothesis and the conclusion ( iii ) is ruled out by conjecture [ spp ] , leaving ( i ) as the only possible option . we will assume that ( iii ) fails and conclude that either ( i ) or ( ii ) holds . by hypothesis , we can find a sequence of @xmath48 going to infinity , and a sequence of squares with vertices , such that each square is inscribed in @xmath278 . the plan is to transform these squares into squares that either converge to a square inscribed in @xmath3 , or become an infinitesimal inscribed square in @xmath3 . we first rule out a degenerate case when one of the points @xmath279 is one of the vertices . suppose for instance that @xmath280 was equal to @xmath48 . since @xmath3 is compact , we see that @xmath272 is contained in a strip of the form @xmath281 using the identity @xmath282 we conclude that @xmath278 is contained in the region @xmath283 if @xmath284 and the remaining three vertices of lie in @xmath278 , this forces @xmath285 to all have argument @xmath286 when viewed as complex numbers , which is absurd for @xmath48 large enough , since these arguments differ by @xmath287 or @xmath176 . thus we have @xmath288 ( after passing to a subsequence of @xmath48 if necessary ) ; a similar argument precludes any of the vertices in being equal to @xmath289 or @xmath290 . at least one of the four vertices in must have a @xmath291-coordinate of magnitude at least @xmath292 , since two of these @xmath291-coordinates differ by @xmath293 and the other two differ by @xmath294 . applying , we conclude that the @xmath295-coordinate of that vertex lies at a distance at least @xmath296 from @xmath279 for some @xmath297 independent of @xmath48 ; by the triangle inequality , we conclude ( for @xmath48 large enough ) that all four vertices have this property . in particular , we have @xmath298 observe that in the region , we may invert @xmath274 by the formula @xmath299 on , we can compute the partial derivatives @xmath300 and @xmath301 and so by taylor expansion we see that @xmath302 thus , if we set @xmath303 and @xmath304 , we see that @xmath305 , and the four vertices of the square @xmath306 all lie within @xmath307 of @xmath3 . by passing to a subsequence , we may assume that @xmath308 converges to some pair @xmath309 , which may possibly be equal to @xmath261 . by compactness of @xmath3 , we may similarly assume that @xmath310 converges to a limit @xmath232 . if @xmath311 , then on taking limits using the closed nature of @xmath3 we conclude that the non - degenerate square @xmath312 is inscribed in @xmath3 , giving ( i ) ; if instead @xmath313 then we obtain ( ii ) . in contrast to the smooth cases of conjecture [ spp ] , there are no homological obstructions to establishing a counterexample to conjecture [ pspp ] . for instance , when the lipschitz constants of @xmath36 are strictly less than one , the arguments of the previous section can be used to produce a quadruplet @xmath72 of rectifiable curves @xmath314 traversing squares , with @xmath154 taking values in @xmath315 , @xmath315 , @xmath316 respectively , and all four curves homologous to the standard @xmath53-cycle @xmath218 . in particular , @xmath157 would ( assuming sufficient transversality and regularity ) intersect the graphs @xmath315 and @xmath316 an even number of times per unit period , rather than an odd number of times . this is of course consistent with the curve not intersecting these graphs at all . the use of an infinite oscillation to switch the parity of intersection from odd to even is reminsicent of the `` eilenberg - mazur swindle '' ( see e.g. @xcite ) . in conjecture [ pspp ] , the four vertices of the square could be distributed arbitrarily among the two graphs @xmath315 and @xmath316 . it seems to be more natural to force each vertex to lie in just one of the two graphs . to formulate this more precisely , we introduce a further definition : [ joint - def ] let @xmath204 . let @xmath317 be four sets in @xmath215 ( possibly overlapping ) . we say that the quadruplet @xmath318 _ jointly inscribes a square _ if @xmath319 intersects @xmath208 , or equivalently if there exist @xmath212 and @xmath320 such that @xmath321 see figure [ joint ] . [ t ] jointly inscribing a square . the order ( up to cyclic permutation ) is important ; for instance , in the given picture , the quadruple @xmath322 does _ not _ jointly inscribe a square.,title="fig:",width=480 ] note in definition [ joint - def ] that we now permit the inscribed square to be degenerate . conjecture [ pspp ] would then follow from [ qpspp ] let @xmath204 , and let @xmath224 be simple closed curves homologous to @xmath218 . then the quadruplet @xmath323 jointly inscribes a square . indeed , if @xmath228 are as in conjecture [ pspp ] , we can apply conjecture [ qpspp ] to obtain @xmath212 and @xmath320 with @xmath324 and @xmath325 . as @xmath225 and @xmath226 are assumed disjoint in conjecture [ pspp ] , we have @xmath311 , and conjecture [ pspp ] follows . we can reverse this implication in some cases : conjecture [ pspp ] implies conjecture [ qpspp ] in the special case that @xmath326 does not inscribe squares for @xmath327 . note that the hypothesis that @xmath326 does not inscribe squares is satisfied in many cases ; for instance , by modifying the proof of lemma [ inscribe ] we see that this is the the case if @xmath328 is the graph of a @xmath22-lipschitz function for some @xmath255 . let @xmath228 be as in conjecture [ qpspp ] , and assume that @xmath225 and @xmath226 do not separately inscribe squares . let @xmath329 be a sufficiently large natural number , then @xmath225 and @xmath330 will be disjoint . applying conjecture [ pspp ] , we may find a square @xmath312 inscribed in @xmath331 . in particular we have @xmath332 \cup [ ml - c , ml+c]\ ] ] for some @xmath23 independent of @xmath329 . if @xmath329 is large enough , this forces the quadruple @xmath333 to be of the form @xmath334 , the form @xmath335 , or some cyclic permutation of @xmath336 . in the first case , we have a square inscribed in @xmath225 , and in the second case we have ( after translation by @xmath337 ) a square inscribed by @xmath226 ; both these cases are ruled out by hypothesis . thus , after cyclic permutation , we may assume that @xmath338 which implies that the ( possibly degenerate ) square @xmath339 is jointly inscribed by @xmath340 , giving conjecture [ qpspp ] in this case . because the squares in definition [ joint - def ] are now permitted to be degenerate , conjecture [ qpspp ] enjoys good convergence properties with respect to limits : [ lim ] let @xmath223 . let @xmath341 be sequences of simple closed curves which converge uniformly to simple closed curves @xmath224 respectively as @xmath52 . if each of the quadruples @xmath342 jointly inscribe a square , then so does @xmath343 by hypothesis , one can find a sequence @xmath344 such that @xmath345 for all @xmath48 . as @xmath346 converge uniformly to @xmath347 , the @xmath348 are bounded and thus have at least one limit point @xmath98 , which must lie in both @xmath207 and @xmath349 , giving the claim . as one application of this proposition , we have [ poly ] in order to prove conjecture [ qpspp ] , it suffices to do so in the case that the simple closed curves @xmath224 are polygonal paths . this can be compared with the situation with conjecture [ spp ] , which is known to be true for polygonal paths , but for which one can not take limits to conclude the general case , due to the possibility of the inscribed squares degenerating to zero . by proposition [ lim ] , it suffices to show that any simple closed curve @xmath219 can be uniformly approximated to any desired accuracy @xmath350 for @xmath28 by a simple polygonal closed curve @xmath351 ( note from a winding number argument that if @xmath12 is homologous to @xmath218 , then @xmath352 will be also if @xmath353 is small enough ) . by uniform continuity , there exists a natural number @xmath354 such that @xmath355 whenever @xmath356 , where @xmath357 denote the riemannian distance functions on @xmath358 respectively ; as @xmath12 is simple and continuous , a compactness argument shows that there also exists @xmath359 such that @xmath360 whenever @xmath361 . finally , by uniform continuity again , there exists a natural number @xmath362 such that @xmath363 whenever @xmath364 . let @xmath365 be the polygonal path such that @xmath366 for every @xmath367 , with @xmath368 linear on each interval @xmath369 $ ] . from the triangle inequality we see that @xmath370 for all @xmath142 . unfortunately , @xmath368 need not be simple . however , if @xmath371 are such that @xmath372 , then by the triangle inequality we have @xmath373 , and hence @xmath356 . using a greedy algorithm to iteratively remove loops from the polygonal path @xmath368 ( with each removal decreasing the number of edges remaining in @xmath368 in a unit period ) , we may thus find a finite family @xmath374 of disjoint closed intervals in @xmath10 , each of length at most @xmath375 , such that paths @xmath376 is closed for each @xmath377 ( i.e. @xmath368 evaluates to the same point at the left and right endpoints of @xmath378 ) , and such that @xmath368 becomes simple once each of the intervals @xmath378 is contracted to a point . note also that all of the loops of @xmath368 removed by this process have diameter @xmath350 . if one then chooses a sufficiently small neighbourhood interval @xmath379 for each @xmath378 , and defines @xmath352 to equal @xmath368 outside @xmath380 , and linear on each of the @xmath379 , then we see that @xmath352 is a simple @xmath381-equivariant polygonal path that lies within @xmath350 of @xmath12 , as required . we in fact believe the following stronger claim than conjecture [ qpspp ] to hold : [ area - ineq ] let @xmath204 , and let @xmath382 be simple closed polygonal paths homologous to @xmath218 . if @xmath383 does not jointly inscribe a square , then @xmath384 note that the @xmath53-form @xmath82 is well defined on @xmath215 and @xmath385 can be viewed as @xmath53-cycles , so the integrals in make sense as integration of differential forms ( but one could also use definition [ area - def ] with the obvious modifications if desired ) . one can also simplify the left - hand side of as @xmath386 where @xmath387 is interpreted as a @xmath53-cycle . viewed contrapositively , conjecture [ area - ineq ] then asserts that @xmath383 must inscribe a square whenever the integral vanishes . clearly , conjecture [ qpspp ] follows from conjecture [ area - ineq ] by first using corollary [ poly ] to reduce to the case where @xmath347 are polygonal paths , and then applying conjecture [ area - ineq ] with @xmath388 replaced by @xmath389 . conjecture [ area - ineq ] is somewhat strong compared with the other conjectures in this paper . nevertheless , we can repeat the arguments in section [ pos - sec ] to obtain some evidence for it : [ ook ] conjecture [ area - ineq ] holds when @xmath390 and @xmath391 for some @xmath27-lipschitz functions @xmath392 for some @xmath28 . of course , by cyclic permutation one can replace the role of @xmath393 here by @xmath394 . write @xmath395 . for any @xmath396 , the map @xmath397 is a contraction on @xmath4 with constant at most @xmath144 , hence by the contraction mapping theorem there exist unique continuous functions @xmath398 such that @xmath399 for all @xmath396 . as @xmath400 are polygonal paths , @xmath401 are piecewise linear functions , which implies that @xmath402 are also piecewise linear . we then set @xmath314 to be the polygonal paths @xmath403 clearly @xmath72 traverses squares . applying lemma [ conserv ] , we conclude that @xmath404 since @xmath405 and @xmath406 are homologous to @xmath407 and @xmath408 respectively , and all @xmath53-forms on curves such as @xmath409 or @xmath410 are automatically closed , we have @xmath411 for @xmath412 . thus it suffices to show that @xmath413 the argument in proposition [ pro ] shows that @xmath157 is simple , and the graph @xmath414 is of course also simple . as we are assuming @xmath383 to not jointly inscribe squares , @xmath415 and @xmath416 must stay disjoint . the curve @xmath157 is homotopic to @xmath417 and thus also homologous to @xmath218 . applying the jordan curve theorem , we see that the closed polygonal paths @xmath418 enclose some non - empty polygonal region @xmath95 in @xmath215 . by stokes theorem , we conclude that the left - hand side of is equal to some sign times the lebesgue measure of @xmath95 , giving as required . we also have an analogue of corollary [ poly ] : [ lim2 ] let @xmath223 . suppose that @xmath419 are simple closed polygonal paths which converge uniformly to simple closed polygonal paths @xmath382 respectively . if conjecture [ area - ineq ] holds for each of the quadruples @xmath420 for all sufficiently small @xmath421 and all @xmath422 , then it also holds for @xmath423 . this proposition will be useful for placing the polygonal paths @xmath424 in `` general position '' . we can of course assume that @xmath383 does not jointly inscribe a square , as the claim is trivial otherwise . by proposition [ lim ] applied in the contrapositive , we see that there exists an @xmath28 and @xmath425 such that @xmath426 does not jointly inscribe squares for any @xmath427 and @xmath428 . applying the hypothesis ( and shrinking @xmath353 if necessary ) , we conclude that @xmath429 for @xmath428 and @xmath430 , and hence @xmath431 taking limits as @xmath52 we conclude that @xmath432 giving the claim . in the remainder of this section , we discuss how to interpret the area inequality conjecture ( conjecture [ area - ineq ] ) using the language of homology . let @xmath223 , and let @xmath382 be simple closed polygonal paths . we say that @xmath433 are in _ general position _ if the following hold for any distinct @xmath434 : * for any edge @xmath435 of @xmath328 and any edge @xmath21 of @xmath436 , the angle between the direction of @xmath435 and the direction of @xmath21 is not an integer multiple of @xmath287 . * for any vertices @xmath437 of @xmath438 respectively , there does not exist a square with @xmath437 as three of its four vertices . it is easy to see that one can perturb @xmath385 by an arbitrarily small amount to be in general position ( e.g. a random perturbation will almost surely work ) ; furthermore one can ensure that this general position will persist even after shifting @xmath408 vertically by an arbitrary amount . hence by proposition [ lim2 ] , to prove conjecture [ area - ineq ] it suffices to do so under the hypothesis of general position . the cartesian product @xmath439 can be viewed as a ( polyhedral ) @xmath440-cycle in @xmath214 ; by the hypotheses of general position , this cycle intersects the flat @xmath122-manifold @xmath208 transversely ( and in a compact set ) , giving rise to a @xmath53-cycle @xmath441 in @xmath208 . for @xmath442 , let @xmath443 be the projection map to the @xmath444 coordinate . because the @xmath440-cycle @xmath439 is homologous to the @xmath440-cycle @xmath445 , we see on restricting to @xmath208 that the @xmath53-cycle @xmath441 is homologous to the @xmath53-cycle @xmath446 ( with the usual orientation ) , and hence the pushforwards @xmath447 ( which are polygonal @xmath53-cycles on @xmath215 ) are homologous to @xmath218 and thus to @xmath436 for @xmath442 . for @xmath448 , @xmath449 takes values in the curve @xmath450 ; as @xmath82 is closed on that curve , we thus have @xmath451 for @xmath448 . on the other hand , from remark [ homog ] ( adapted to the cylinder @xmath215 in the obvious fashion ) , the @xmath53-form @xmath452 is exact on @xmath208 , and hence @xmath453 putting all this together , we see that the claim can be rewritten as @xmath454 meanwhile , the hypothesis that @xmath455 do not jointly inscribe squares is equivalent to the assertion that the @xmath53-cycles @xmath157 and @xmath456 are disjoint . the @xmath122-manifold @xmath208 is homeomorphic to @xmath457 , and so its first homology is generated by @xmath458 . one can decompose the @xmath53-cycle @xmath441 as an integer linear combination of finitely many closed polygonal curves in @xmath208 ( which are allowed to intersect each other ) ; as @xmath441 is homologous to @xmath458 , one of these curves , call it @xmath459 , must be homologous to @xmath460 for some nonzero integer @xmath329 . by multiplying the period @xmath381 by @xmath461 , we may assume without loss of generality that @xmath462 , and by reversing the orientation of @xmath463 if necessary we may then take @xmath464 . thus @xmath463 is homologous to @xmath458 and contained ( as a set ) in @xmath441 , and @xmath465 is a @xmath53-boundary , thus @xmath466 for some @xmath467-cycle @xmath468 in @xmath208 . we can then define curves @xmath469 for @xmath442 by @xmath470 ; these curves are the analogues of the curves @xmath471 from section [ pos - sec ] . as the @xmath53-form @xmath82 is closed on the curves @xmath450 , we have @xmath472 for @xmath448 , while from the exact nature of gives @xmath473 and hence @xmath474 hence one can also express as @xmath475 the @xmath53-cycle @xmath476 is homologous to @xmath477 and thus can be expressed as a @xmath53-boundary @xmath478 for some @xmath467-cycle @xmath95 in @xmath215 . by stokes theorem , can now be expressed as @xmath479 in the case when the @xmath480 were graphs of lipschitz functions of constant less than @xmath53 , the closed path @xmath481 was necessarily simple ; if @xmath482 did not jointly inscribe squares , then @xmath483 avoided @xmath456 , and so by the jordan curve theorem the @xmath467-cycle @xmath95 had a definite sign which yielded and thus , , . unfortunately , in the general case it is possible for the @xmath467-cycle @xmath95 to contain both positive and negative components , even after stripping out the @xmath53-boundaries @xmath56 from @xmath441 and working just with @xmath484 . however , from working with numerous examples , it appears to the author that there is always an imbalance between the positive and negative components of @xmath95 that leads to the inequality and hence to conjecture [ area - ineq ] . unfortunately , the author was unable to locate an argument to establish this claim rigorously . the jordan curve theorem does imply that the curve @xmath414 partitions the cylinder @xmath215 into two connected components , the region `` above '' @xmath414 ( which contains all the points in @xmath215 with sufficiently large positive @xmath291 coordinate ) and the region `` below '' @xmath414 ( which contains all the points in @xmath215 with sufficiently large negative @xmath291 coordinate ) . suppose that @xmath485 does not jointly inscribe a square , so that @xmath157 avoids @xmath456 . if we let @xmath486 denote the connected component of @xmath157 ( viewed as a subset of @xmath215 ) that contains ( the image of ) @xmath481 , then @xmath486 must then either lie entirely in the region above @xmath414 or the region below @xmath414 . we conjecture that this determines the sign in ( or , , ) . namely , if @xmath486 is in the region above @xmath414 , we conjecture that left - hand side of ( or , , ) must be strictly positive , and if @xmath486 is in the region below @xmath414 , then these left - hand sides must be strictly negative . an equivalent statement of this is that if @xmath487 are simple closed polygonal paths that traverse the upper and lower boundary of @xmath486 respectively ( by which we mean the portions of the boundary of @xmath486 that can be connected by a path to points in @xmath215 with arbitrarily large positive or negative @xmath291 coordinate respectively ) , then we have the inequalities @xmath488 this claim , which implies conjecture [ area - ineq ] , is an assertion about the relative sizes of the `` holes '' in @xmath486 ; see figure [ kfig ] . [ t ] ( drawn as a solid line ) , together with some additional @xmath53-boundaries @xmath489 ( dashed lines ) . here , @xmath486 is @xmath481 together with the cycle intersecting @xmath481 . the paths @xmath490 and @xmath491 are drawn ( somewhat inaccurately ) as dotted lines . the area inequalities can then be written as @xmath492 , where @xmath88 denotes the lebesgue measure of the region @xmath89 in the figure , and similarly for @xmath493 . each @xmath53-boundary gives a zero contribution to the area under @xmath157 , so one also has @xmath494 . in the depicted scenario , the first area inequality is automatically true , but the second one is not necessarily so.,title="fig:",width=480 ] we now consider the special case of conjecture [ area ] when the polygonal path @xmath417 is the reference cycle @xmath218 : [ area-1d ] conjecture [ area ] holds when @xmath495 . in this case , conjecture [ area - ineq ] turns out to collapse from a two - dimensional problem to a more tractable one - dimensional one . suppose that @xmath496 does not jointly inscribing a square , with @xmath495 . that is to say , there does not exist @xmath212 and @xmath320 with @xmath497 the first condition @xmath498 simply asserts that @xmath499 . if one now defines the linearly transformed closed polygonal curves @xmath500 by the formulae @xmath501 where @xmath502 are the components of @xmath328 for @xmath117 , then @xmath503 remain simple , and ( on setting @xmath504 ) we see that the property of @xmath496 not jointly inscribing squares is equivalent to the non - existence of real numbers @xmath505 such that @xmath506 also , from the change of variables we see that @xmath507 for @xmath508 . relabeling @xmath503 as @xmath509 , and writing @xmath510 as @xmath2 respectively , we thus see that conjecture [ area-1d ] is equivalent to the following more symmetric version : [ sai ] let @xmath204 , and let @xmath511 be simple closed polygonal paths homologous to @xmath218 , such that there does not exist points @xmath512 with @xmath513 and @xmath514 . then one has @xmath515 in this section we show that conjecture [ sai ] is equivalent to an almost purely combinatorial statement . to formulate it , we need some definitions . recall that the _ signum function _ @xmath516 \to \{-1,+1\}$ ] on the extended real line @xmath517 $ ] is defined to equal @xmath518 of @xmath519 , @xmath126 on @xmath126 , and @xmath520 on @xmath521 $ ] . [ ncs - def ] let @xmath522 , and for each @xmath523 , let @xmath524 $ ] be extended reals . we say that the pairs @xmath525 for @xmath526 have _ non - crossing sums _ if the following axioms are obeyed : * either all of the @xmath527 avoid @xmath528 , or they all avoid @xmath529 . * for any @xmath530 , the sum @xmath531 ( which is well defined by ( i ) ) is non - zero . * one has the cancellation @xmath532 or equivalently ( by ( ii ) ) @xmath533 that is to say , there are as many positive sums @xmath534 with the index sum @xmath535 even as there are positive sums @xmath534 with @xmath535 odd ( and similarly with `` positive '' replaced by `` negative '' ) . otherwise , we say that the pairs @xmath536 for @xmath526 have _ crossing sums_. [ inv ] the notion of non - crossing sums is invariant with respect to interchanges between @xmath537 and @xmath538 for @xmath526 , or between the pairs @xmath539 for @xmath526 , or by replacing each of the @xmath540 with their negations @xmath541 . one could define this concept for other values of @xmath329 than @xmath522 , but these are the only two values of @xmath329 we will need here . [ ncs ] let @xmath542 be distinct elements of @xmath543 . then the pairs @xmath544 and @xmath545 have non - crossing sums if and only if the number of pairs @xmath546 with @xmath547 is even , thus for instance @xmath544 and @xmath545 will have non - crossing sums if @xmath548 or @xmath549 but not if @xmath550 in particular , if @xmath551 , @xmath552 and @xmath545 have non - crossing sums if and only if @xmath553 lies outside of @xmath554 $ ] . in a more topological form : the pairs @xmath544 and @xmath545 have non - crossing sums iff it is possible to connect @xmath555 and @xmath556 ( resp . @xmath557 and @xmath558 ) by a curve @xmath559 ( resp . @xmath560 ) in the ( one - point compactification of the ) right half - plane @xmath561 , in such a manner that @xmath559 and @xmath560 do not cross . the pairs @xmath562 have non - crossing sums because there are as many positive sums @xmath563 with an even index sum as there are positive sums @xmath564 , @xmath565 with an odd index sum . on the other hand , the pairs @xmath566 have crossing sums because there are fewer positive sums @xmath567 with an even index sum than positive sums @xmath568 with an odd index sum . as we shall see later , the notion of @xmath536 for @xmath569 having non - crossing sums also has a topological interpretation ( assuming axiom ( i ) ) , namely that there are curves @xmath59 in the one - point compactification of @xmath561 connecting @xmath570 to @xmath571 for @xmath569 such that there do not exist @xmath513 with @xmath514 and @xmath572 in @xmath59 for @xmath569 . this may help explain the terminology `` non - crossing sums '' . [ diff ] suppose that @xmath573 and @xmath574 are real numbers such that @xmath575 have non - crossing sums . the @xmath576 sums formed from this triplet may be almost completely ordered as @xmath577 ( the reader may wish to first see this in the case @xmath578 ) . the sums @xmath579 have even index sum , and the other four sums have odd index sum . therefore , @xmath580 has non - crossing sums precisely when the origin @xmath126 falls in one of the five intervals @xmath581 ( with the third interval deleted if @xmath582 ) . in particular , we see that pair @xmath583 with the smallest difference has no influence on the sign of the triple sums , that is to say @xmath584 for @xmath585 and @xmath586 . conversely , if this pair has no influence on the sign of triple sums then the pairs @xmath575 have non - crossing sums . this lack of influence by the pair with the smallest difference can thus be used as an alternate definition of non - crossing sums in the @xmath587 case ( and it also works in the @xmath588 case ) . one corollary of this analysis is that if @xmath589 has no influence on the sign of the triple sums , then neither does @xmath583 ; similarly , if @xmath590 has no influence on the non - crossing sums , then neither does @xmath589 . we are now ready to give the combinatorial formulation of conjecture [ sai ] . [ adf ] let @xmath591 be odd natural numbers , and for each @xmath569 , let @xmath592 be distinct real numbers . adopt the convention that @xmath593 . assume the following axioms : * ( non - crossing ) for any @xmath594 and @xmath595 with @xmath596 the same parity , the pairs @xmath597 and @xmath598 have non - crossing sums . * ( non - crossing sums ) for any @xmath599 , @xmath600 , @xmath601 with @xmath602 the same parity , the pairs @xmath603 , @xmath604 , @xmath605 have non - crossing sums . then one has the inequality @xmath606 the main result of this section is then [ aqv ] conjecture [ sai ] ( and hence conjecture [ area-1d ] ) is equivalent to conjecture [ adf ] . let us first assume conjecture [ sai ] and see how it implies conjecture [ adf ] . let @xmath591 and @xmath540 obey the assumptions of conjecture [ adf ] , but suppose for contradiction that failed . the plan is then to use the quantities @xmath540 to build simple closed polygonal paths @xmath607 for some @xmath204 to which conjecture [ sai ] may be applied . by perturbing one of the @xmath540 slightly ( noting that all the hypotheses on the @xmath540 are open conditions ) we may assume that the quantity @xmath608 is strictly positive . similarly , we may assume that the differences @xmath609 with @xmath569 and @xmath610 are all distinct . we will need a strictly monotone decreasing function @xmath611 $ ] ; the exact choice of @xmath612 is unimportant , but for concreteness one can take for instance @xmath613 . let @xmath223 be a sufficiently large quantity to be chosen later . we will also need a certain large and negative quantity @xmath614 ( depending on @xmath615 , and the @xmath540 ) whose precise value will be specified later . by applying conjecture [ adf](ii ) with @xmath616 , we see that @xmath617 have non - crossing sums , which implies that @xmath618 similarly if we apply conjecture [ adf](ii ) with @xmath619 , @xmath620 , @xmath621 , we see that @xmath622 as a consequence , we may find piecewise linear continuous functions @xmath623 \to { \mathbb{r}}$ ] such that @xmath624 for @xmath569 , and such that @xmath625 for all @xmath626 . for instance , we can set @xmath627 to be the linear functions given by the boundary conditions . but we can also subtract an arbitrary positive multiple of @xmath628 from any of @xmath627 and obey the above requirements . in particular , there is a quantity @xmath629 ( independent of @xmath381 ) such that if the quantity @xmath614 mentioned previously is less than or equal to @xmath629 , one can find @xmath627 solving the above conditions such that @xmath630 henceforth we fix @xmath627 with these properties . let @xmath569 . we construct some polygonal paths @xmath631 in @xmath215 by the following recipes : [ recipe ] * @xmath632 is the rightward horizontal line segment from @xmath633 to @xmath570 , projected to @xmath215 . * for any odd @xmath610 , @xmath634 is the piecewise linear path traversing the vertices @xmath635 in that order ( that is to say , the concatenation of a rightward horizontal line segment , a vertical line segment , and a leftward horizontal line segment , if @xmath381 is large enough ) , and then projected to @xmath215 . * for any even @xmath636 , @xmath637 is the piecewise linear path traversing the vertices @xmath638 in that order ( that is to say , the concatenation of a leftward horizontal line segment , a vertical line segment , and a rightward horizontal line segment , if @xmath381 is large enough ) , and then projected to @xmath215 . * @xmath639 is the rightward horizontal line segment from @xmath640 to @xmath641 , projected to @xmath215 . * @xmath642 is the graph @xmath643 traversed from left to right and then projected to @xmath215 , thus it begins at @xmath644 and ends at @xmath645 . see figure [ jam ] . [ t ] , in the case @xmath646 . notice the interlacing between the @xmath647 with @xmath98 odd and the @xmath647 with @xmath98 even , and the alternating orientations of @xmath59 at these locations.,title="fig:",width=480 ] clearly , one can concatenate the paths @xmath631 to form a closed polygonal path @xmath59 in @xmath215 ( which one can parameterise by @xmath10 after a suitable rescaling ) . using the convex fundamental domain @xmath648 \times { \mathbb{r}}$ ] of @xmath215 , we see that @xmath59 is homotopic in this domain to the horizontal line segment from @xmath649 to @xmath650 , and hence @xmath59 is homologous in @xmath215 to @xmath218 . using conjecture [ adf](i ) , we can show suppose @xmath381 is sufficiently large . then for any @xmath651 , the path @xmath59 is simple . each of the components @xmath631 of @xmath59 are separately simple , and the endpoints are all distinct except for the endpoints of adjacent paths , so it suffices to show that no two of these components meet in the interior . the interior of the path @xmath642 lies in the strip @xmath652 ( viewed as a subset of @xmath215 ) , while the interior of the other paths lie in either @xmath653 or @xmath654 , again only touching the boundary at endpoints . so it suffices to show that there are no crossings in @xmath653 or @xmath654 . we just verify the claim for @xmath653 , as the case of @xmath654 is completely analogous . the only path components here are @xmath632 and @xmath634 for @xmath636 even . to check that @xmath632 and @xmath634 do not cross , it suffices from definitions [ recipe](i ) , ( iii ) to show that @xmath537 does not lie between @xmath655 and @xmath656 . but from conjecture [ adf](i ) we see that @xmath657 and @xmath658 have non - crossing sums , which gives the claim by example [ ncs ] . now we need to check that @xmath634 and @xmath659 do not cross when @xmath660 are even and distinct . by conjecture [ adf](i ) , the pairs @xmath597 and @xmath598 have non - crossing sums ; thus the interval spanned by @xmath661 either is disjoint from , contains , or is contained in the interval spanned by @xmath662 . in the former case , the paths @xmath634 and @xmath659 are clearly disjoint because from definition [ recipe](iithe @xmath291 coordinate of any point on the first path lies in the interval spanned by @xmath662 , and the @xmath291 coordinate on any point on the second path lies in the interval spanned by @xmath663 . by symmetry , the only remaining case to check is when the interval spanned by @xmath662 is contained in the interval spanned by @xmath663 . but in this case , we have @xmath664 , so by definition [ recipe](iii ) and the monotone decreasing nature of @xmath612 , the vertical segment of the curve @xmath634 lies to the right of that of @xmath665 . from this we see that the two curves are disjoint . this concludes the demonstration of simplicity in @xmath666 ; the case of @xmath667 is similar . in a similar fashion , we can use conjecture [ adf](ii ) , we can show there does not exist @xmath212 and @xmath668 with @xmath514 such that @xmath669 for all @xmath569 . suppose for contradiction that @xmath670 exist with the stated properties . first suppose that @xmath295 lies in @xmath671 $ ] ( projected to @xmath10 ) . then from definition [ recipe](v ) we have @xmath672 for @xmath569 , but then from we can not have @xmath673 , a contradiction . we now treat the case when @xmath295 lies in @xmath674 $ ] ( projected to @xmath10 ) ; the remaining case when @xmath295 lies in @xmath675 $ ] is similar and will be omitted . by definition [ recipe ] , we see that each of the @xmath572 lies either on @xmath639 or on @xmath676 for some odd @xmath677 . suppose first that each of the @xmath572 lie on @xmath678 . by hypothesis , the quantities @xmath679 for @xmath569 are distinct ; by cyclic permutation we may assume that @xmath680 is the smallest of these quantities , or equivalently that @xmath681 is minimised at @xmath682 . by definition [ recipe](ii ) , the @xmath295 coordinate of @xmath683 does not exceed @xmath680 , which implies that @xmath684 and hence by further application of definition [ recipe](ii ) we have @xmath685 and @xmath686 for some @xmath687 and @xmath688 ; furthermore @xmath689 lies between @xmath690 and @xmath691 inclusive . since @xmath673 , this implies that the sums @xmath692 and @xmath693 do not have the same sign . because @xmath682 minimises @xmath681 , we conclude ( from example [ diff ] ) that the pairs @xmath694 , @xmath695 , @xmath696 do not have non - crossing sums , contradicting conjecture [ adf](ii ) . the case when one or more of the @xmath572 lies on @xmath639 is treated similarly , with @xmath697 now playing the role of @xmath698 ( and recalling the convention @xmath699 . this concludes the treatment of the case @xmath700 $ ] , and the case @xmath701 $ ] is similar . from the previous two lemmas and conjecture [ sai ] , we conclude that @xmath702 we work in the fundamental domain @xmath703 \times { \mathbb{r}}$ ] of @xmath215 . on the strip @xmath671 \times { \mathbb{r}}$ ] , the contribution to @xmath704 is @xmath705 thanks to definition [ recipe](v ) and . on the strip @xmath706 \times { \mathbb{r}}$ ] , the curve @xmath59 for @xmath569 is simply the union of the line segments @xmath706 \times \{y_{i , p}\}$ ] for @xmath707 ( traversed from left to right for odd @xmath98 , and right to left for even @xmath98 ) , so the contribution to @xmath704 here is @xmath708 thanks to . finally , the contribution of the remaining strips @xmath709 \times { \mathbb{r}}\cup [ \frac{l}{2}-2 , -\frac{l}{2}-1 ] \times { \mathbb{r}}$ ] is some quantity @xmath710 independent of @xmath381 and @xmath711 , as can be seen by translating these strips by @xmath712 . the inequality thus becomes @xmath713 but as @xmath714 is positive , we can make this quantity vanish by choosing @xmath381 large enough and then setting @xmath715 ; note for @xmath381 large enough that this value of @xmath614 will be less than the threshold @xmath629 needed so that one can arrange the function @xmath627 to obey . this yields the desired contradiction . now we assume conjecture [ adf ] and see how it implies conjecture [ sai ] . by applying ( a slight variant of ) proposition [ lim2 ] , we see that to prove conjecture [ sai ] , it suffices to do so under the additional nondegeneracy hypothesis that all the vertices of @xmath509 have distinct @xmath295-coordinates ( in particular , these curves do not contain any vertical edges ) . write @xmath716 for some piecewise linear @xmath717 and @xmath718 . as @xmath59 is homologous to @xmath218 , we can find a continuous lift @xmath719 of @xmath720 with @xmath721 for all @xmath142 ; we also let @xmath722 be the periodic lift of @xmath723 . as @xmath724 is periodic and continuous , it is bounded ; by multiplying the period @xmath381 by a large integer if necessary , we may assume that latexmath:[\[\label{x - stable } @xmath142 and @xmath569 . using the nondegeneracy hypothesis , we see that for any @xmath569 and any @xmath726 , the fibre @xmath727 consists of a finite number @xmath728 of real numbers , where the function @xmath697 is odd , periodic in @xmath381 and locally constant for all @xmath295 outside of finitely many residue classes mod @xmath381 . we can enumerate these real numbers as @xmath729 where @xmath730 are those real numbers @xmath149 with @xmath731 , arranged in increasing order , thus @xmath732 for all @xmath726 , @xmath569 , and @xmath733 . for @xmath295 outside of finitely many residue classes mod @xmath381 , the functions @xmath734 are locally linear , and have the @xmath381-equivariance property @xmath735 for all @xmath726 , @xmath569 , and @xmath733 . also , from the nondegeneracy hypothesis we see from the intermediate value theorem that outside of finitely many residue classes mod @xmath381 , @xmath734 is increasing for odd @xmath736 and decreasing for even @xmath736 . the analogue of the set @xmath737 in this context is the flat @xmath738-dimensional submanifold @xmath739 of @xmath740 defined by @xmath741 the hypotheses of conjecture [ sai ] then assert that the @xmath738-cycle @xmath742 in @xmath740 does not intersect @xmath739 . we view @xmath739 as a submanifold of the @xmath122-manifold @xmath743 defined by @xmath744 as we assumed the vertices of @xmath745 to have distinct @xmath295 coordinates , the @xmath122-cycle @xmath742 intersects @xmath40 transversely in some @xmath53-cycle @xmath746 . as @xmath745 are homologous to @xmath218 , @xmath746 is homologous to the @xmath53-cycle @xmath747 with the standard orientation . now we argue as in the previous section . the @xmath122-manifold @xmath40 is homeomorphic to @xmath457 and thus has first homology generated by @xmath458 . by the greedy algorithm can express the @xmath53-cycle @xmath746 as a finite integer linear combination of closed paths contained ( as a set ) in @xmath746 , each of which is either simple or a @xmath53-boundary ; one of these , say @xmath748 , is homologous to @xmath460 for some non - zero integer @xmath329 , and is thus simple . by multiplying the period @xmath381 by @xmath461 we may assume that @xmath462 , and by reversing the orientation of @xmath749 we can then assume that @xmath464 , thus @xmath749 is homologous to @xmath458 and is contained ( as a set ) in @xmath746 ; in particular , it avoids @xmath739 . if we write @xmath750 then @xmath751 , @xmath752 are piecewise linear continuous functions with @xmath753 homologous to the identity function ( in the sense that @xmath753 lifts to a function @xmath754 with @xmath755 for all @xmath142 ) , with the properties that @xmath756 and @xmath757 for all @xmath396 and @xmath569 . [ dyn ] one can view the functions @xmath758 from a dynamical perspective by thinking of @xmath759 as the trajectory of a particle @xmath760 that is constrained to lie in @xmath761 , and with all three particles @xmath762 constrained to lie on a vertical line . we can also constrain the particles @xmath762 to have a constant horizontal speed ; the particles move in one horizontal direction until one of the particles @xmath760 can not move any further due to it hitting a vertex @xmath763 of @xmath59 with both edges adjacent to @xmath763 lying on the same side of the vertical line containing @xmath763 . whenever such a collision occurs , the horizontal velocity reverses sign , @xmath760 moves from one edge of @xmath59 to the next , and the other two particles reverse themselves and retrace their steps ; see figure [ collide ] . note from our hypotheses that only one collision occurs at a time . because the paths @xmath745 have only finitely many edges , these trajectories must be periodic ; the above homological considerations ensure that at least one of these trajectories is homologous to @xmath458 ( possibly after enlarging the period @xmath381 ) . [ t ] .,title="fig:",width=336 ] recall that @xmath751 lifts to a function @xmath754 such that @xmath755 for all @xmath142 , thus @xmath764 is periodic and therefore bounded . we also lift @xmath765 periodically to @xmath766 . by lifting and , we can then find unique continuous functions @xmath767 with @xmath768 for all @xmath142 , such that @xmath769 for all @xmath142 . by replacing @xmath381 with a large multiple if necessary , we may assume that @xmath770 for all @xmath142 and @xmath569 . by continuity and , we see that the expression @xmath771 is either positive for all @xmath149 , or negative for all @xmath149 . by applying the reflection @xmath772 on @xmath215 we may assume the latter case occurs , thus @xmath773 for all @xmath396 . to establish conjecture [ sai ] , it suffices to show that @xmath774 integrating fibre by fibre , it will suffice to show that @xmath775 for almost every @xmath726 . fix @xmath726 ; we may assume that @xmath295 avoids all the @xmath295 coordinates of vertices of @xmath745 . we abbreviate @xmath776 and @xmath777 for @xmath569 and @xmath778 , adopting the conventions @xmath593 . applying conjecture [ adf ] , it will suffice to verify the hypotheses ( i ) , ( ii ) of that conjecture . let @xmath779 denote the largest time @xmath780 for which @xmath781 ( such a time exists thanks to and continuity ) . we claim that @xmath782 for all @xmath569 . suppose for contradiction that this failed for some @xmath569 , then from one has @xmath783 for some @xmath610 . from and the intermediate value theorem we must then have @xmath784 for some @xmath785 , which by , gives @xmath786 , contradicting the maximality of @xmath787 . similarly , if @xmath788 is the smallest time @xmath789 for which @xmath790 , then @xmath791 for @xmath569 . from applied at the times @xmath792 we have the inequalities @xmath793 and @xmath794 having obtained these inequalities , we will have no further need of the functions @xmath795 or the curves @xmath749 , although we will introduce a variant of these functions shortly . we now verify the non - crossing property ( i ) for any given @xmath569 . we just verify the claim when @xmath596 are odd , as the claim when @xmath596 are even is completely analogous . first suppose that @xmath796 . let @xmath797 denote the restriction of path @xmath798 to the interval @xmath799 $ ] ; define @xmath800 similarly . the path @xmath797 traces out a piecewise linear curve in @xmath4 that starts at @xmath801 , ends at @xmath802 , and does not encounter the vertical line @xmath803 at any point in between ; also , it moves to the right for @xmath149 near @xmath804 ( and to the left for @xmath149 near @xmath805 ) . thus , this curve @xmath797 must stay in the right half - plane @xmath806 ; actually , by we see that it stays in the strip @xmath807 \times { \mathbb{r}}$ ] ( say ) . similarly for @xmath800 . on the other hand , as @xmath59 is simple and @xmath808 , the two paths @xmath797 and @xmath800 can not meet . from the jordan curve theorem and example [ ncs ] , this forces the endpoints @xmath597 and @xmath661 of these paths to be non - crossing , giving ( i ) in this case . now suppose that @xmath809 . in this case we define @xmath800 to be the restriction of @xmath798 to the interval @xmath810 $ ] ( this interval is well - defined by ) . this is a path from @xmath811 to @xmath812 that does not cross @xmath813 except at endpoints , and hence lies in the strip @xmath814 \times { \mathbb{r}}$ ] . it can not cross @xmath797 , which also lies in this strip , avoids the right edge , and starts and ends at the points @xmath815 on the left edge . by the jordan curve theorem , this implies that @xmath816 can not lie between @xmath655 and @xmath656 , which by example [ ncs ] implies ( since @xmath817 ) that @xmath662 and @xmath818 are non - crossing . this concludes the establishment of ( i ) when @xmath596 are odd ; the case when @xmath596 are even is analogous ( working to the left of @xmath819 rather than to the right , and using the convention @xmath820 rather than @xmath699 ) and is omitted . now we verify ( ii ) for @xmath599 , @xmath600 , @xmath601 with @xmath602 the same parity . we just establish the claim when @xmath602 are all odd , as the case when @xmath602 are all even is completely analogous . in the case @xmath821 , we see from and the conventions @xmath822 that the pairs @xmath823 , @xmath824 , @xmath825 . thus we may assume that @xmath826 for at least one @xmath827 ; say @xmath828 . as in the proof of ( i ) , we can form the curves @xmath829 for @xmath569 , which lie in the strip @xmath830 \times { \mathbb{r}}$ ] , with initial point @xmath831 and final point @xmath832 . for @xmath569 , let @xmath720 denote the maximum @xmath295 coordinate attained by @xmath829 , thus @xmath833 ; furthermore @xmath834 if @xmath835 and @xmath836 otherwise , in particular @xmath837 . as the vertices of @xmath59 have distinct @xmath295 coordinates , the @xmath720 are distinct in the interval @xmath838 $ ] ; without loss of generality we may then take @xmath839 . for @xmath569 , define @xmath840 to be the connected component of @xmath841 \times { \mathbb{r}}$ ] that contains @xmath842 ; thus @xmath843 , and for @xmath844 , @xmath840 is a piecewise path connecting @xmath842 to some point on the vertical line @xmath845 . consider the set @xmath846 the set @xmath847 a union of line segments in @xmath848 . it contains the point @xmath849 with exactly one line segment emenating from it ; @xmath847 similarly contains the point @xmath850 with exactly line segment emenating from it . a local analysis ( using the non - degeneracy hypothesis that the vertices of @xmath745 all have distinct @xmath295 coordinates ) then reveals that every other point @xmath851 in @xmath847 is either an interior point of a line segment in @xmath847 ( and avoids all other line segments comprising @xmath847 ) , or else is a vertex that is the endpoint of exactly two edges in @xmath847 ; this claim is most delicate in the case where @xmath852 , in which the curves @xmath853 and @xmath854 have terminated , but @xmath855 leaves @xmath856 in two leftward directions , thus again forming two edges in @xmath847 ( see figure [ turning ] ) . because of this , there must be a path @xmath857 in @xmath847 from @xmath849 to @xmath850 ( cf . remark [ dyn ] ) . by the hypothesis of conjecture [ sai ] , we must have @xmath858 for all @xmath149 . in particular , we conclude that the sums @xmath859 have the same sign . a similar argument ( using the connected component of @xmath840 containing @xmath860 rather than @xmath842 as appropriate ) shows more generally that the sums @xmath861 have the same sign for @xmath687 and @xmath862 ( this claim is trivially true when @xmath863 or @xmath864 . by definition [ ncs - def ] , we conclude that the pairs @xmath603 , @xmath604 , @xmath605 have non - crossing sums , giving ( ii ) in the case that @xmath602 are all odd ; the claim when @xmath602 are all even are proven similarly ( using the convention @xmath865 instead of @xmath866 , working to the left of @xmath819 rather than to the right , and using in place of ) and is omitted . this completes the derivation of conjecture [ sai ] from conjecture [ adf ] , and establishes theorem [ aqv ] . [ t ] in @xmath847 when @xmath867 equals @xmath868.,title="fig:",width=288 ] from theorem [ aqv ] , we see that any counterexample to conjecture [ adf ] can be converted to counterexamples for conjectures [ sai ] , [ area-1d ] , and [ area - ineq ] , and we believe it likely that such counterexamples , should they exist , could then be modified to give counterexamples to conjectures [ qpspp ] , [ pspp ] , [ pspps ] , and hence the original square peg conjecture ( conjecture [ spp ] ) . on the other hand , after extensive testing of examples , the author is now inclined to believe that conjecture [ adf ] is true , and a proof of this conjecture is likely to lead to an approach to establish conjecture [ area ] ( and hence conjectures [ qpspp ] , [ pspp ] , [ pspps ] ) and perhaps even conjecture [ spp ] . we do not have a proof of conjecture [ adf ] in full generality , however we can verify some special cases . firstly , we can handle the case when one of the odd integers @xmath697 , say @xmath869 , is equal to @xmath53 . using the construction in theorem [ aqv ] , we see that this case is equivalent to the special case of conjecture [ sai ] when @xmath157 is a horizontal line @xmath870 for some real number @xmath871 and all @xmath149 . by subtracting @xmath872 from @xmath157 and adding @xmath872 to ( say ) @xmath873 , we may thus normalise @xmath874 , so that @xmath875 . the hypothesis of conjecture [ sai ] then ensures that the reflection @xmath876 of @xmath873 across the @xmath295 axis is disjoint from @xmath368 , hence by the jordan curve theorem and stokes theorem as before we have @xmath877 giving conjecture [ sai ] in this case since @xmath878 . of course , one expects to also be able to verify the @xmath879 case of conjecture [ adf ] by a direct combinatorial argument , without explicit invocation of the jordan curve theorem . we can do this by developing some combinatorial analogues of the jordan curve theorem that are valid even when @xmath880 . for any @xmath881 and @xmath882 $ ] , define the _ winding number _ @xmath883 by the alexander numbering rule @xmath884 ( where we use the hypothesis that @xmath697 is odd ) , thus @xmath885 is a half - integer on @xmath592 , a locally constant integer outside of these points , and jumps by @xmath886 when one perturbs off of one of the @xmath540 in either direction . also observe that @xmath883 equals @xmath126 near @xmath528 , and @xmath53 near @xmath529 . from fubini s theorem we can relate the winding number to the alternating sum @xmath887 by the identity @xmath888 which holds for all sufficiently large @xmath889 . a similar argument gives @xmath890 again for sufficiently large @xmath889 . [ cjct ] suppose that the hypotheses of conjecture [ adf ] hold . let @xmath569 . then one has @xmath891 for all @xmath892 , and @xmath893 for all @xmath291 in @xmath517 \backslash \{y_{i,1},\dots , y_{i , k+1}\}$ ] . because @xmath885 is locally constant away from @xmath894 and jumps by @xmath886 when it reaches any of the @xmath540 , it suffices to establish the first claim . let @xmath610 . from conjecture [ adf](i ) we have @xmath895 for all @xmath896 distinct from @xmath98 with the same parity as @xmath98 ( using the conventions @xmath897 ) . direct inspection shows that the claim also holds for @xmath898 . summing over @xmath899 , and noting that the contributions of @xmath900 or @xmath901 are the same on both sides , we conclude that @xmath902 and hence @xmath903 for all @xmath610 . direct computation also shows that @xmath904 when @xmath905 maximises @xmath655 , and the claim follows . next , for distinct @xmath906 and @xmath882 $ ] , we define the further winding number @xmath907 by the similar formula @xmath908 as before , @xmath907 will be a locally constant integer away from the sums @xmath909 , that equals @xmath126 for sufficiently large positive @xmath291 and @xmath53 for sufficiently large negative @xmath291 . from fubini s theorem we have the analogue @xmath910 for sufficiently large @xmath889 . curiously , one has the convolution identity @xmath911 where the primes denote distributional derivatives , although the author was not able to make much use of this identity . the winding numbers @xmath912 also have some resemblance to the steinberg formula @xcite for the multiplicity of irreducible representations in a tensor product , although this is likely to be just a coincidence . by permutation we may set @xmath682 , @xmath926 , @xmath927 . suppose that @xmath599 , @xmath600 , @xmath601 have the same parity . by conjecture [ adf](ii ) we have @xmath928 summing over @xmath929 and noting that the contributions of @xmath930 are the same on both sides we see that @xmath931 for all @xmath601 ; since @xmath932 , we conclude ( i ) . now suppose @xmath933 and @xmath934 have the same parity and @xmath935 , and let @xmath936 have the same parity as @xmath98 and @xmath899 . from conjecture [ adf](ii ) we see that the pairs @xmath937 , @xmath938 , @xmath939 have non - crossing sums , which by example [ diff ] implies that at least one of the pairs @xmath937 , @xmath939 have no influence on the triple sums . this implies that @xmath940 for @xmath921 ; summing in @xmath941 we obtain . the claim is proven similarly . this proposition is already enough to reprove the @xmath879 case of conjecture [ adf ] as follows . by adding @xmath871 to all of the @xmath942 and then sending @xmath871 to zero , we may assume that @xmath943 . then we have @xmath944 and @xmath945 for all @xmath291 , and hence by proposition [ inclusion ] we have @xmath946 for @xmath947 and @xmath948 for @xmath949 . we conclude that on the set @xmath950 , the function @xmath951 is locally constant and vanishes at the endpoints , thus we have the inclusion @xmath952 this inclusion is strict because the endpoints @xmath953 of the former set can not match any of the endpoints @xmath954 of the latter set due to the non - vanishing of the sums @xmath955 . we conclude ( using lemma [ cjct ] ) that for sufficiently large @xmath889 , we have @xmath956 and the desired claim then follows from , . the above arguments crucially used the hypothesis in conjecture [ adf](i ) . indeed , the conjecture is false without this hypothesis ; a simple counterexample is when @xmath957 , @xmath958 , @xmath959 , @xmath960 , @xmath961 , and @xmath962 . we can partially extend these arguments to cover the cases @xmath880 as follows . we use lemma [ cjct ] to partition @xmath963 where @xmath964 ( resp . @xmath965 ) consists of those pairs @xmath966 for which @xmath967 ( resp . @xmath968 ) . we will work primarily on @xmath964 , although much of the analysis below also applies to @xmath965 . the set @xmath965 is a combinatorial analogue of the compact set @xmath486 in the end of section [ quad ] , while @xmath964 plays the role of the @xmath53-boundaries @xmath489 that avoid this compact set . the set @xmath964 avoids the boundary of @xmath969 and is thus actually a subset of @xmath970 . we place a directed graph @xmath971 on the vertex set @xmath964 as follows . if @xmath933 and @xmath934 have the same parity and @xmath972 , we connect @xmath973 to @xmath974 whenever @xmath975 is odd with @xmath976 , and connect @xmath974 to @xmath973 whenever @xmath975 is even with @xmath976 . if instead @xmath596 have the same parity and @xmath977 , we connect @xmath978 to @xmath979 whenever @xmath980 is odd with @xmath981 and connect @xmath979 to @xmath978 whenever @xmath980 is even with @xmath981 . by lemma [ inclusion](ii ) , this construction only produces edges that start and end in @xmath964 ; indeed , every point @xmath309 in @xmath982 will be connected to another point in this set , either by an outgoing edge ( if @xmath983 has the opposite parity to @xmath98 or @xmath899 ) or an incoming edge ( if @xmath983 has the same parity as @xmath98 or @xmath899 ) . applying this procedure to each square @xmath984 with @xmath933 and @xmath934 the same parity , one obtains a directed graph @xmath971 in which each vertex has exactly one outgoing edge and one incoming edge ; thus @xmath985 decomposes into disjoint simple directed cycles . any one of these cycles @xmath12 can enter a vertical line @xmath986 from the left only when the second coordinate is odd , and from the right only when the second coordinate is even ; thus @xmath12 will intersect such a vertical line at odd second coordinates the same number of times as at even second coordinates ; that is to say @xmath987 similarly for every horizontal line , thus @xmath988 for all @xmath989 . as a consequence , we have @xmath990 for each cycle @xmath12 , and hence on summing in @xmath12 @xmath991 and hence by @xmath992 next , we claim the identity @xmath993 for all @xmath994 . this is certainly the case for @xmath995 , so it suffices to show that @xmath996 for all @xmath936 . fix such a @xmath941 . by breaking up @xmath964 into squares , it suffices to show that @xmath997 whenever @xmath933 and @xmath934 have the same parity as @xmath941 . suppose first that @xmath998 , then by lemma [ inclusion](ii ) , the set @xmath999 is the union of horizontal lines @xmath1000 . it then suffices to show that for each such line , we have @xmath1001 for all @xmath1002 with the same parity as @xmath596 ; but from conjecture [ adf](ii ) and example [ diff ] , the sign of the triple sums of @xmath937 , @xmath938 , @xmath1003 are not influenced by one of @xmath937 or @xmath1003 , giving . the case when @xmath1004 is treated similarly ( using vertical lines in place of horizontal lines ) . if we now define the modified winding number @xmath1005 then we see from and proposition [ inclusion ] that @xmath1006 for all @xmath994 . from and fubini s theorem we see that @xmath1007 and @xmath1008 for sufficiently large @xmath889 . on the set @xmath1009 , we now see that the function @xmath1010 is locally constant ( since , by definition of @xmath1010 , all the discontinuities @xmath1011 of @xmath1010 lie in the set @xmath1012 ) and equal to @xmath126 on the boundary ( thanks to ) . this gives the inclusion @xmath1013 which generalises ( a permutation of ) . this gives some ( but not all ) cases of conjecture [ adf ] : the inclusion is strict , because the endpoints of the set @xmath1015 can not agree with any of the endpoints of @xmath1016 . we conclude ( using lemma [ cjct ] and the hypothesis @xmath1017 ) that for sufficiently large @xmath889 that @xmath1018 and the desired inequality then follows from , . this observation can handle several further cases of conjecture [ adf ] ( e.g. the perturbative regime in which the @xmath1019 are very small compared to the differences between the @xmath1020 ) . unfortunately it is possible for @xmath1010 to exceed @xmath53 , which means that one can not resolve conjecture [ adf ] purely on the strength of the inclusion . however , it appears from numerous examples that whenever this occurs , a significant portion of the set @xmath1021 is `` closed off '' from @xmath1022 , in that the set @xmath1023 is prohibited from entering that portion , which restores the truth of conjecture [ adf ] ; the author was able to make this statement rigorous in the case @xmath1024 by a rather lengthy and _ ad hoc _ argument , which unfortunately does not seem to extend to the general case . rather than present this ( somewhat unenlightening ) argument here , we give an example to illustrate this `` closing off '' phenomenon . we will take @xmath1025 and @xmath1026 and @xmath1027 ( this ordering is consistent with the non - crossing hypothesis ( i ) ) . we will assume that we are in the `` almost perturbative setting '' in which the nine sums @xmath1028 for @xmath1029 are ordered by the relations @xmath1030 thus the only uncertainty in the ordering of these nine sums arises from the relative positions of @xmath1031 and @xmath1032 ; clearly both orderings are possible . these relations imply the further inequalities @xmath1033 by this and many applications of proposition [ inclusion](ii ) we can see that @xmath968 for all @xmath1034 , hence @xmath964 is empty and @xmath1035 in this case . first suppose one is in the `` fully perturbative '' setting where @xmath1036 ( this for instance occurs when all the @xmath1037 are small compared to the differences @xmath1038 and @xmath1039 ) . in this case the winding number @xmath1040 only takes the values @xmath126 and @xmath53 , with the former occurring on the intervals @xmath1041 and proposition [ tap ] gives in this case . in this case one can make the error in arbitrarily small ; for instance if one takes @xmath1042 and @xmath1043 for some sufficiently small @xmath1044 , one can check that the hypotheses of conjecture [ adf ] hold , and the left and right - hand sides of differ by @xmath1045 ; see figure [ good ] . [ t ] , where @xmath1046 lies on a simple curve passing through @xmath1047 , and @xmath1048 lies on a simple curve passing through @xmath1049 . note how the entire region ( viewed as a subset of the @xmath291-axis , drawn here as a dashed line ) lies above the solid line , in the sense that it is connected to @xmath1050 for arbitrarily large and negative @xmath1051 . the points @xmath1052 for @xmath1053 ( not pictured ) lie just above curve in this region.,title="fig:",width=480 ] now suppose that @xmath1054 . in this case , @xmath1040 now takes the value of @xmath126 on the intervals @xmath1055 but is additionally equal to @xmath1056 on the interval @xmath1057 . the argument used to prove proposition [ tap ] then fails to establish , incurring instead an additional additive error of @xmath1058 . however , in this case the portion @xmath1059 of @xmath1060 now becomes `` closed off '' from the points @xmath1061 , in the sense that none of the @xmath1062 can lie in this interval , which also implies that @xmath1063 can not equal @xmath53 in this interval either . this lets one improve the bound arising from by a factor of @xmath1064 , which exceeds the loss of @xmath1065 incurred previously because @xmath1066 . this restores conjecture [ adf ] in this case . to see why none of the @xmath1062 lie in @xmath1059 , suppose for contradiction that this were not the case , and let @xmath1067 be the largest index such that @xmath1068 this index @xmath98 can not equal @xmath869 , because this would imply that the pairs @xmath1069 , @xmath1070 and @xmath1071 have crossing sums ( only one of the eight sums from these pairs is positive ) , contradicting conjecture [ adf](ii ) . the same argument excludes the case when @xmath98 is odd and less than @xmath869 , since in this case @xmath1072 avoids @xmath1059 by hypothesis , and also avoids @xmath1073 since @xmath1010 equals @xmath520 there ( here is where we use @xmath1054 ) , so one has an odd number of positive sums in this case . finally , the index @xmath98 can not be even , because @xmath1074 lies outside @xmath1075 and also outside @xmath1076 ( as @xmath1077 equals @xmath520 there ) and hence the triple @xmath1078 , @xmath1079 , @xmath1080 would be crossing ( this has an odd number of positive sums ) , again contradicting conjecture [ adf](ii ) . thus conjecture [ adf ] holds in all of these cases . more generally , the author has observed numerically that every creation of a region where @xmath1010 exceeds @xmath53 will invariably be accompanied by a larger region of @xmath1081 which is now `` closed off '' from @xmath1022 , and was able to verify this claim rigorously when @xmath957 or @xmath1082 by _ ad hoc _ methods , but was unable to see how to establish such a claim in general . [ t ] between @xmath1032 and @xmath1031 . but to compensate for this , the region between @xmath1083 and @xmath1084 , which still has a winding number of @xmath126 , has been cut off from @xmath1050 for large @xmath889 . this cut - off region is necessarily larger ( as measured as a portion of the @xmath291-axis ) than the region of winding number @xmath1056.,title="fig:",width=480 ] Abstract:

Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.

Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered . Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video . Paper: phylogenetic trees ( evolutionary trees ) are widely used in evolutionary biology to represent the tree - like evolution of a collection of extant species . however , due to reticulation events , such as hybridization and lateral gene transfer ( lgt ) in evolution , phylogenetic trees representing the evolutionary history of different parts of the genomes found in the same collection of the extant species may differ . in order to facilitate the comparison of these different phylogenetic trees , several metrics were proposed in the literature , such as robinson - foulds distance @xcite , nni ( nearest neighbor interchange ) distance @xcite , tbr ( tree bisection and reconnection ) distance , spr ( subtree prune and regraft ) distance @xcite , and hybridization number @xcite . the spr distance between two phylogenetic trees is the minimum number of subtree prune and regraft operations @xcite that needed to convert one tree to the other , which is equivalent to the minimum number of reticulation events to transform between the two trees . thus , the spr distance provides a lower bound on the number of such events needed to reconcile the two phylogenetic trees @xcite . and this lower bound gives an indication of the extent to which reticulation has influenced the evolutionary history of the extant species under consideration . similarly to the definition of the spr distance , the tbr distance between two phylogenetic trees is the minimum number of ` tree bisection and reconnection ' operations @xcite that needed to convert one tree to the other . although the tbr distance has no known direct biological meaning , it can be used to bound the space of phylogenetic trees . for the study of tbr distance and spr distance , a graph theoretical model , the _ maximum agreement forest _ ( maf ) of two phylogenetic trees , has been formulated . define the _ order _ of a forest to be the number of connected components in the forest . allen and steel @xcite proved that the tbr distance between two _ unrooted binary _ phylogenetic trees is equal to the order of their maf minus @xmath4 , and bordewich and semple @xcite proved that the rspr distance between two _ rooted binary _ phylogenetic trees is equal to the order of their rooted version of maf minus @xmath4 . therefore , there are extensive researches studying the maf problem , which asks for constructing an maf for the given two phylogenetic trees . traditionally , biological researchers assumed that phylogenetic trees are bifurcating @xcite , which leads to most previously work about the maf problem are restricted to binary trees . however , for many biological data sets in practice ( e.g. , @xcite ) , the constructed phylogenetic trees are not strictly bifurcating , that is , these trees contain polytomies . there are two reasons for the polytomies in phylogenetic trees . first , lack of sufficient data or inappropriate analysis of characters , which result in poor resolution of true bifurcating relationships . second , multiple , simultaneous speciation events @xcite . moreover , more recent evidences show the existence of simultaneous speciation events ( e.g. , @xcite ) . therefore , it is crucial to study the general ( i.e. , binary and non - binary ) phylogenetic trees . note that , it is not difficult to verify that the order of an maf for two rooted general trees minus 1 is equal to their spr distance , and the order of an maf for two unrooted general trees minus 1 is equal to their tbr distance . note again that we may construct multiple ( i.e. , two or more ) different phylogenetic trees for the same collection of species according to different data sets or different building methods . constructing an maf for these different trees makes more biological meaning than just for two trees . there are two reasons . first , take the maf for two rooted phylogenetic trees for instance , we have mentioned above that the spr distance between two trees provides a lower bound on the number of reticulation events needed to reconcile the two trees . but these two trees only represent the evolutionary histories of two different parts of the genomes found in the collection of species , thus , this lower bound can only give an indication of the extent to which reticulation has influenced the evolutionary histories of the two parts of the genomes found in the collection of species . if we construct a phylogenetic tree for each part of the genomes found in the collection of species and compare these different trees simultaneously , then , similarly , we can also have the same conclusion that the order of the maf for these trees provides a lower bound on the number of reticulation events needed to reconcile these trees . and this lower bound can give a more comprehensive indication of the extent to which reticulation has influenced the evolutionary history of the collection of species . second , constructing the maf for multiple trees is a critical step in studying the reticulate networks of multiple phylogenetic trees @xcite , which is a hot issue in phylogenetics . therefore , it is meaningful to study the maf problem on multiple trees . however , the maf problem on multiple trees has not been studied as extensively as that on two trees . above all , it makes perfect sense to investigate the maf problem on multiple general phylogenetic trees . in this paper , we will focus on the approximation algorithms and parameterized algorithms for the maf problem on multiple rooted general trees , and for the maf problem on multiple unrooted general trees . in the following , we firstly review the previous related work about the maf problem . in terms of computational complexity , it is known that computing the order of an maf is np - hard and max snp - hard for two unrooted binary phylogenetic trees @xcite , as well as for two rooted binary phylogenetic trees @xcite . * approximation algorithms*. for the maf problem on two rooted binary phylogenetic trees , hein et al.@xcite proposed an approximation algorithm of ratio @xmath1 . but rodrigues et al.@xcite found a subtle error in @xcite , showed that the algorithm in @xcite has ratio at least @xmath3 , and presented a new approximation algorithm which they claimed has ratio @xmath1 . bonet et al.@xcite provided a counterexample and showed that both the algorithms in @xcite and @xcite compute a @xmath5-approximation of the rspr distance between two rooted binary trees in linear time . the approximation ratio was improved to 3 by bordewich et al.@xcite , but at the expense of an increased running time of @xmath6 . a second 3-approximation algorithm presented in @xcite achieves a running time of @xmath7 . whidden et al.@xcite presented the third 3-approximation algorithm , which runs in linear - time . recently , shi et al.@xcite presented an improved approximation algorithm of ratio @xmath8 , which is the best known approximation algorithm for the maf problem on two rooted binary trees . for the maf problem on two unrooted binary phylogenetic trees , whidden et al.@xcite presented a linear - time best known approximation algorithm of ratio @xmath1 . there is also a couple of approximation algorithms for the maf problem on two general phylogenetic trees . rodrigues et al.@xcite developed an approximation algorithm of ratio @xmath9 for the maf problem on two rooted general trees , where @xmath10 is the maximum number of children a node in the input trees may have . chen et al.@xcite developed a @xmath1-approximation algorithm , which is the first constant - ratio approximation algorithm for the maf problem on two unrooted general trees . for the maf problem on multiple rooted binary phylogenetic trees , chataigner @xcite presented an @xmath11-approximation algorithm . recently , the approximation ratio was improved to @xmath1 by shi et al . @xcite . for the maf problem on multiple unrooted binary trees , shi et al . @xcite presented a @xmath3-approximation algorithm . to our best knowledge , there is currently no known approximation algorithm for the maf problem on multiple rooted ( unrooted ) general phylogenetic trees . * parameterized algorithms*. parameterized algorithms for the maf problem , parameterized by the order @xmath12 of an maf , have also been studied . a parameterized problem is _ fixed - parameter tractable _ @xcite if it is solvable in time @xmath13 , where @xmath12 is the parameter and @xmath14 is the input size . for the maf problem on two unrooted binary phylogenetic trees , allen and steel @xcite showed that is fixed - parameter tractable . hallett and mccartin @xcite developed a faster parameterized algorithm of running time @xmath15 . whidden and zeh @xcite further improved the time complexity to @xmath16 or @xmath17 . for the maf problem on two rooted binary phylogenetic trees , bordewich _ et al . _ @xcite developed a parameterized algorithm of running time @xmath18 . et al . _ @xcite improved this bound and developed an algorithm of running time @xmath19 . et al . _ @xcite presented currently the fastest algorithm of running time @xmath20 for the maf problem on two rooted binary trees . there is also a couple of parameterized algorithms for the maf problem on two general phylogenetic trees . et al . _ @xcite presented a parameterized algorithm of running time @xmath19 for the maf problem on two rooted general trees . and chen et al.@xcite developed an algorithm of running time @xmath21 for the maf problem on two unrooted general trees , which is also currently the fastest algorithm for the maf problem on two unrooted binary trees . for the maf problem on multiple rooted binary phylogenetic trees , chen et al . @xcite presented a parameterized algorithm of running time @xmath22 . shi et al . @xcite improved this bound and developed an algorithm of running time @xmath21 . for the maf problem on multiple unrooted binary phylogenetic trees , shi et al . @xcite presented the first parameterized algorithm of running time @xmath17 . to our best knowledge , there is currently no known parameterized algorithm for the maf problem on multiple rooted ( unrooted ) general phylogenetic trees . * contributions*. in the current paper , we are focused on the approximation algorithms and parameterized algorithms for the maf problem on multiple general phylogenetic trees , for both the version of rooted trees and the version of unrooted trees . our algorithms are based on careful analysis of the graph structures that takes advantage of special relations among leaves in the trees . our main contributions include two parameterized algorithms for the maximum agreement forest problem on multiple general trees : one for rooted trees that runs in time @xmath0 , and the other for unrooted trees that runs in time @xmath2 . and two approximation algorithms for the maximum agreement forest problem on multiple general trees : one for rooted trees with ratio @xmath1 , and the other for unrooted trees with ratio @xmath3 . we implement the approximation algorithm and parameterized algorithm for the maf problem on multiple rooted general phylogenetic trees , obtain programs amaf and pmaf , respectively . we test both programs on simulated data and biological data . given multiple rooted general trees , pmaf can calculate the order of an maf for these trees rapidly when the order of an maf is small . and the order of the agreement forest returned by amaf is always less than @xmath1 times the order of an maf for these trees . a tree is a _ single - vertex tree _ if it consists of a single vertex , which is the leaf of the tree . a tree is _ general _ if either it is a single - vertex tree or each of its vertices has degree either @xmath4 or greater than @xmath23 . the degree-@xmath4 vertices are _ leaves _ and the other vertices are _ non - leaves _ of the tree . there are two kinds of trees in our discussion , one is unrooted trees and the other is rooted trees . in the following , we first give the terminologies on the unrooted trees , then remark on the differences for the rooted trees . let @xmath24 be a fixed irrelevant _ label - set_. a general tree is _ unrooted _ if no root is specified in the tree in this case no ancestor - descendant relation is defined in the tree . for the label - set @xmath24 , an unrooted _ general phylogenetic @xmath24-tree _ , or simply an unrooted _ @xmath24-tree _ , is an unrooted general tree whose leaves are labeled bijectively by the label - set @xmath24 ( all non - leaves are unlabeled ) . subforest _ of an unrooted @xmath24-tree @xmath25 is a subgraph of @xmath25 . and a _ subtree _ @xmath26 of @xmath25 is a connected subgraph of @xmath25 , which contains at least one leaf in @xmath25 . denote by @xmath27 the label set that contains all labels in @xmath26 . an unrooted _ @xmath24-forest @xmath28 _ is a subforest of an unrooted @xmath24-tree @xmath25 that contains all leaves of @xmath25 such that each connected component of @xmath28 contains at least one leaf in @xmath25 . thus , an unrooted @xmath24-forest @xmath28 is a collection of subtrees of @xmath25 , moreover , the label - sets of these subtrees are disjoint and the union of the label - sets is equal to @xmath24 . define the _ order _ of the @xmath24-forest @xmath28 , denoted ord@xmath29 , to be the number of connected components in @xmath28 . a subtree @xmath26 of an unrooted @xmath24-tree may contain unlabeled vertices of degree less than @xmath1 . in this case we apply the _ forced contraction _ operation on @xmath26 , which replaces each degree-@xmath23 vertex @xmath30 and its incident edges with a single edge connecting the two neighbors of @xmath30 , and removes each unlabeled vertex that has degree smaller than @xmath23 . note that the forced contraction does not change the order of an @xmath24-forest . it has been well - known that the forced contraction operation does not affect the construction of an maf for @xmath24-trees . therefore , we will assume that the forced contraction is applied immediately whenever it is applicable . an @xmath24-forest @xmath28 is _ irreducible _ if the forced contraction can not apply to @xmath28 . thus , the @xmath24-forests in our discussion are always assumed to be irreducible . with this assumption , each unlabeled vertex in an unrooted @xmath24-forest has degree not less than @xmath1 . two @xmath24-forests @xmath31 and @xmath32 are isomorphic if there is a graph isomorphism between @xmath31 and @xmath32 in which each leaf of @xmath31 is mapped to a leaf of @xmath32 with the same label . we will simply say that an @xmath24-forest @xmath33 is a subforest of another @xmath24-forest @xmath28 if , up to the forced contraction , @xmath33 is isomorphic to a subforest of @xmath28 . a general tree is _ rooted _ if a particular leaf is designated as the root ( so it is _ both _ a root and a leaf ) , which specifies a unique ancestor - descendant relation in the tree . a rooted @xmath24-_tree _ is a rooted general tree whose leaves are labeled bijectively by the label - set @xmath24 . the root of a rooted @xmath24-tree will always be labeled by a special label @xmath34 , which is always assumed to be in the label - set @xmath24 . a subtree @xmath26 of a rooted @xmath24-tree @xmath25 is a connected subgraph of @xmath25 which contains at least one leaf in @xmath25 . in order to preserve the ancestor - descendant relation in @xmath25 , we should define the root of the subtree @xmath26 . if @xmath26 contains the leaf labeled @xmath34 , certainly , it is the root of the subtree ; otherwise , the node in @xmath26 that is in @xmath25 the least common ancestor of all the labeled leaves in @xmath26 is defined to be the root of @xmath26 . subforest _ of a rooted @xmath24-tree @xmath25 is defined to be a subgraph of @xmath25 . a rooted _ @xmath24-forest @xmath28 _ is a subforest of a rooted @xmath24-tree @xmath25 that contains a collection of subtrees whose label - sets are disjoint such that the union of the label - sets is equal to @xmath24 . thus , one of the subtrees in a rooted @xmath24-forest @xmath28 must have the leaf labeled @xmath34 as its root . we also assume that the forced contraction is applied immediately whenever it is applicable . however , if the root @xmath35 of a subtree @xmath26 is of degree @xmath23 , then the operation will _ not _ be applied on @xmath35 , in order to preserve the ancestor - descendant relation in @xmath26 . thus , all unlabeled vertices in @xmath26 that are not the root of @xmath26 have degree not less than @xmath1 . the following terminologies are used for both rooted trees and unrooted trees . an @xmath24-forest @xmath28 is an _ agreement forest _ for a collection @xmath36 of @xmath24-forests if @xmath28 is a subforest of @xmath37 , for all @xmath38 . a _ maximum agreement forest _ ( abbr . maf ) @xmath39 for @xmath40 is an agreement forest for @xmath40 with a minimum ord@xmath41 over all agreement forests for @xmath40 . the four versions of the maf problem on multiple general @xmath24-forests studied in the current paper , are formally given as follows . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ rooted parameterized maximum agreement forest ( para - rmaf ) + _ input _ : a set @xmath42 of rooted general @xmath24-forests , and a parameter @xmath12 + _ output _ : an agreement forest @xmath39 for @xmath42 with ord@xmath43 + or report that no such an agreement forest exists + unrooted parameterized maximum agreement forest ( para - umaf ) + _ input _ : a set @xmath42 of unrooted general @xmath24-forests , and a parameter @xmath12 + _ output _ : an agreement forest @xmath39 for @xmath42 with ord@xmath43 + or report that no such an agreement forest exists + rooted maximum agreement forest ( app - rmaf ) + _ input _ : a set @xmath42 of rooted general @xmath24-forests + _ output _ : a maximum agreement forest @xmath39 for @xmath42 + unrooted maximum agreement forest ( app - umaf ) + _ input _ : a set @xmath42 of unrooted general @xmath24-forests + _ output _ : a maximum agreement forest @xmath39 for @xmath42 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ every agreement forest @xmath28 for a collection @xmath36 of @xmath24-forests corresponds to a unique minimum subgraph ( contains the minimum number of edges ) of @xmath37 , denoted by @xmath44 , for all @xmath38 . thus , without any confusion , we can simply say that an edge @xmath45 is in or not in the agreement forest @xmath28 , as long as @xmath45 is in or not in the unique corresponding subgraph @xmath44 , respectively . the following concept on two @xmath24-forests will play an important role in our discussion . let @xmath31 and @xmath32 be two @xmath24-forests ( either both rooted or both unrooted ) . an agreement forest @xmath28 for @xmath31 and @xmath32 is a _ maximal agreement forest _ ( _ maximal - af _ ) for @xmath31 and @xmath32 if there is no agreement forest @xmath33 for @xmath31 and @xmath32 such that @xmath28 is a subforest of @xmath33 and @xmath46 . by definition , an maf for two @xmath24-forests @xmath31 and @xmath32 is also a maximal - af for @xmath31 and @xmath32 , but the inverse is not necessarily true . fix a label - set @xmath24 . because of the bijection between the leaves in an @xmath24-forest @xmath28 ( either rooted or unrooted ) and the labels in the label - set @xmath24 , sometimes we will use , without confusion , a label in @xmath24 to refer to the corresponding leaf in @xmath28 , or vice versa . for a subset @xmath47 of edges in an @xmath24-forest @xmath28 ( either rooted or unrooted ) , we will denote by @xmath48 the forest @xmath28 with the edges in @xmath47 removed . for any @xmath24-forest @xmath33 that is a subforest of @xmath28 , it is easy to see that there is an edge subset @xmath49 of @xmath28 that @xmath50 . for an arbitrary edge @xmath45 in an @xmath24-forest @xmath28 , removing edge @xmath45 would lead two new subtrees be constructed in @xmath51 , denoted by @xmath52 and @xmath53 , respectively . let @xmath36 be a collection of @xmath24-forests ( either all are rooted or all are unrooted ) , @xmath54 . in the following , we give a reduction rule for @xmath36 . * reduction rule 1 . * let @xmath55 be several subtrees in @xmath24-forest @xmath56 , @xmath57 , @xmath58 . if there exists an edge @xmath45 in @xmath24-forest @xmath59 , @xmath60 , @xmath61 , that @xmath62 and @xmath63 , then remove @xmath45 from @xmath59 . [ reduction rule 1 ] let @xmath64 be the collection that produced by reduction rule 1 on the collection @xmath36 , then @xmath64 and @xmath36 have the same collection of mafs . let @xmath28 be a fixed maf for @xmath36 . let @xmath65 and @xmath66 . since @xmath28 is a subforest of @xmath56 , for each subtree @xmath67 in @xmath56 , @xmath68 , we have that any label of @xmath69 can not be in the same connected component with any label of @xmath70 in @xmath28 . thus , any label of @xmath71 can not be in the same connected component with any label of @xmath72 in @xmath28 . suppose edge @xmath45 is in @xmath28 . then there would exist a path in @xmath28 that connects a label of @xmath73 and a label of @xmath74 . because @xmath75 and @xmath76 , so there would exist a path in @xmath28 that connects a label of @xmath71 and a label of @xmath72 , which contracts the fact that any label of @xmath71 can not be in the same connected component with any label of @xmath72 in @xmath28 . thus , edge @xmath45 could not be in @xmath28 . therefore , @xmath28 is still a subforest of @xmath77 , and @xmath28 is also an maf for @xmath64 . we will assume that reduction rule 1 is applied whenever it is possible . a instance ( of anyone of the four versions of maf problem ) is _ strongly reducible _ if reduction rule 1 is not applicable on it . therefore , all instances in our following discussion are always strongly reducible . before analyzing the detail parameterized algorithms for para - rmaf and para - umaf , we firstly give a few lemmas , which hold true for both para - rmaf and para - umaf . and according to these lemmas , we can present the general frame of our parameterized algorithms . the first lemma follows directly from the definition of maximal - af . [ maximal ] every agreement forest for two @xmath24-forests @xmath31 and @xmath32 is a subforest of a maximal - af @xmath33 for @xmath31 and @xmath32 , but @xmath33 may not be unique . since the maf @xmath28 for a set of @xmath24-forests @xmath36 must be an agreement forest for @xmath31 and @xmath32 , thus , by lemma [ maximal ] , there must exist a maximal - af @xmath33 for @xmath31 and @xmath32 that @xmath28 is a subforest of @xmath33 . moreover , we have the following lemma . [ maximal - maf ] let @xmath78 be a set of @xmath24-forests , and let @xmath28 be a fixed maf for it . there must exist a maximal - af @xmath33 for @xmath31 and @xmath32 that @xmath28 is also an maf for @xmath79 . let @xmath28 be a fixed maf for @xmath80 , and let @xmath33 be a maximal - af for @xmath31 and @xmath32 that @xmath28 is a subforest of @xmath33 . obviously , @xmath28 is an agreement forest for @xmath79 , thus , the order of the maf for @xmath79 is not larger than ord@xmath29 . on the other hand , every agreement forest for @xmath79 is also an agreement forest for @xmath78 , thus , the order of the maf for @xmath79 is not less than ord@xmath29 . therefore , the order of the maf for @xmath79 is ord@xmath29 , @xmath28 is an maf for @xmath79 . let @xmath81 be an instance of either para - rmaf or para - umaf . now according to lemma [ maximal - maf ] , we can give the general frame of our parameterized algorithms . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ main - algorithm + 1 . construct a collection @xmath82 of agreement forests for @xmath31 and @xmath32 that + contains all maximal - af @xmath28 for @xmath31 and @xmath32 with ord@xmath83 ; + 2 . * for * each @xmath28 in the collection @xmath84 constructed in step 1 + recursively work on the instance @xmath85 . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ for an @xmath24-subforest @xmath33 of an @xmath24-forest @xmath28 , we always have ord@xmath86 . thus , no maximal - af @xmath28 for @xmath31 and @xmath32 with ord@xmath87 can contain an maf @xmath33 for @xmath81 with ord@xmath88 . therefore , in step 1 of main - algorithm , we only need examine all maximal - afs whose order is bounded by @xmath12 . [ main - para ] the main - algorithm correctly returns an agreement forest @xmath39 with ord@xmath43 for @xmath89 if such an agreement forest exists . if there exists an agreement forest @xmath39 with ord@xmath43 for @xmath89 , by lemma [ maximal - maf ] , there must exist a maximal - af @xmath28 for @xmath31 and @xmath32 that @xmath39 is also an maf for @xmath90 , which is an instance examined in step 2 . therefore , if @xmath81 has a solution , then step 2 will return such a solution . on the other hand , if there exists an agreement forest @xmath39 for @xmath91 with ord@xmath43 , then , obviously , @xmath39 is also a solution for @xmath89 . thus , every solution for @xmath91 is also a solution for @xmath89 . that is , if @xmath81 has no solution , step 2 could not return a solution . the theorem is proved . in the following two subsections , we will discuss the detail ways of how to construct all maximal - afs for two rooted general @xmath24-forests and for two unrooted general @xmath24-forests separately . then , combining the main algorithm , we can give the detail parameterized algorithms for para - rmaf and para - umaf . two leaves of a rooted general @xmath24-forest are siblings if they have a common parent . sibling set _ is set of leaves that are siblings . maximal sibling set _ mss ) @xmath92 is a sibling set that the common parent @xmath93 of @xmath92 has degree either @xmath94 if @xmath93 has no parent or @xmath95 if @xmath93 has a parent . in this subsection , we present the way of enumerating all maximal - afs for two rooted general @xmath24-forests @xmath31 and @xmath32 . let @xmath39 be a fixed maximal - af for @xmath31 and @xmath32 . we begin with a simple lemma . [ simpleroot ] let @xmath31 and @xmath32 be two rooted general @xmath24-forests . if @xmath32 has no mss , then @xmath31 and @xmath32 have the unique maximal - af which can be constructed in linear time . if @xmath32 has no mss , then @xmath32 has at most one edge . if @xmath32 has no edge , then all connected components of @xmath32 are single - vertex trees and @xmath32 itself is the unique maximal - af for @xmath31 and @xmath32 . if @xmath32 has one edge , then all connected components of @xmath32 are single - vertex trees except one that is a single - edge tree whose root is @xmath34 with a unique child that is labeled by a label @xmath96 . if @xmath34 and @xmath96 are in the same connected component in @xmath31 , then the unique maximal - af for @xmath31 and @xmath32 is @xmath32 itself ; otherwise , the unique maximal - af for @xmath31 and @xmath32 consists of only single - vertex trees , each is labeled by an element in @xmath24 . by lemma [ simpleroot ] , in the following discussion , we will assume that @xmath32 has an mss @xmath92 . because we assumed that all instances in our discussion are strongly reducible , so none of labels in @xmath92 is a single - vertex tree in @xmath31 ; otherwise , reduction rule 1 can remove the edge incident to the label in @xmath32 which is a single - vertex tree in @xmath31 . in the following , we consider all possible cases for the labels of @xmath92 in @xmath31 . since @xmath97 , we can assume that labels @xmath98 and @xmath99 belong to @xmath92 . * case 1 . * all labels in @xmath92 consist an mss in @xmath31 . in this case , @xmath31 and @xmath32 have the same local structure in term of @xmath92 , which consists of the labels in @xmath92 and the parent of @xmath92 . thus , in the further processing of @xmath31 and @xmath32 , the local structure remains unchanged . therefore , we can treat it as an un - decomposable structure . note that @xmath39 also have the local structure . * step 1 . * group all labels in @xmath92 and their parent into an un - decomposable structure , and mark the unit with the same label in @xmath31 and @xmath32 . to implement step 1 , we simply remove all labels in @xmath92 and label the parent with @xmath100 , where @xmath100 is a combination of the labels in @xmath92 ( e.g. , assume @xmath101 , then @xmath102 ) . in the further processing of @xmath31 and @xmath32 , we can treat @xmath100 as a new leaf in the forests . this step not only changes the structures of @xmath31 and @xmath32 , but also replaces the label - set @xmath24 with a new label - set @xmath103 . if we also apply this operation on the maximal - af @xmath39 , then the new @xmath39 remains a maximal - af for the new @xmath31 and @xmath32 . * case 2 . * all labels in @xmath92 are siblings in @xmath31 . let @xmath104 be the common parent of @xmath92 in @xmath31 . and let @xmath105 be the set that contains all vertices whose parent is @xmath104 in @xmath31 , except the labels in @xmath92 . set @xmath106 could not be an empty set , otherwise , the labels in @xmath92 would consist an mss in @xmath31 , which satisfies the condition of case 1 . there are three situations for @xmath98 and @xmath99 in @xmath39 . situation 1 . @xmath98 is a single - vertex tree in @xmath39 . thus , removing the edge incident to @xmath98 in @xmath31 and @xmath32 keeps @xmath39 still a maximal - af for @xmath31 and @xmath32 . situation 2 . @xmath99 is a single - vertex tree in @xmath39 . thus , removing the edge incident to @xmath99 in @xmath31 and @xmath32 keeps @xmath39 still a maximal - af for @xmath31 and @xmath32 . situation 3 . neither @xmath98 nor @xmath99 is a single - vertex tree in @xmath39 . because @xmath98 and @xmath99 are siblings in @xmath32 , so @xmath98 and @xmath99 are siblings in @xmath39 . moreover , for this situation , we have the following lemma . [ allsiblings - rooted ] let @xmath31 and @xmath32 be two rooted general @xmath24-forests , and let @xmath92 be an mss of @xmath32 that all labels in @xmath92 are siblings in @xmath31 . for any maximal - af @xmath28 for @xmath31 and @xmath32 , if there are two labels in @xmath92 that are siblings in @xmath28 , then all labels in @xmath92 consist an mss in @xmath28 . suppose that labels @xmath98 and @xmath99 belong to @xmath92 and @xmath98 and @xmath99 are siblings in @xmath28 . at first , we show that all labels in @xmath92 are siblings in @xmath28 . there are two cases based on the cardinality of @xmath92 . case ( i ) : @xmath107 . then , @xmath108 . obviously , this case holds true . case ( ii ) : @xmath109 . assume that label @xmath110 . if @xmath98 and @xmath111 are in different connected components in @xmath28 , then because @xmath98 and @xmath111 are siblings in @xmath32 , so at least one of @xmath112 and @xmath113 can not be in @xmath28 , where @xmath112 and @xmath113 are the edges that incident to @xmath98 and @xmath111 in @xmath32 , respectively . therefore , at least one of @xmath98 and @xmath111 is a single - vertex in @xmath28 . but @xmath98 and @xmath99 are siblings in @xmath28 , so @xmath98 is not a single - vertex tree in @xmath28 , thus , @xmath111 is a single - vertex tree in @xmath28 . by attaching the single - vertex tree @xmath111 to the common parent of @xmath98 and @xmath99 in @xmath28 , we could get an agreement forest for @xmath31 and @xmath32 that consists of fewer trees , which contracts the fact that @xmath28 is a maximal - af for @xmath31 and @xmath32 . thus , @xmath98 and @xmath111 must be in the same connected component in @xmath28 . then , because @xmath98 and @xmath111 are siblings in @xmath32 , so @xmath98 and @xmath111 are also siblings in @xmath28 . therefore , all labels in @xmath92 are siblings in @xmath28 . now we show that the labels in @xmath92 consist an mss in @xmath28 . since @xmath28 is a subforest of @xmath32 , the parent of @xmath92 in @xmath32 corresponds to the the parent of @xmath92 in @xmath28 . and because the parent of @xmath92 in @xmath32 has @xmath94 children , so the parent of @xmath92 in @xmath28 has at most @xmath94 children . therefore , the labels in @xmath92 consist an mss in @xmath28 . let @xmath114 be the set that contains all edges @xmath115 $ ] , @xmath116 . by lemma [ allsiblings - rooted ] , all edges in @xmath114 could not be in @xmath39 . therefore , in situation 3 , removing the edges in @xmath114 from @xmath31 keeps @xmath39 still a maximal - af for @xmath31 and @xmath32 . summarizing above analysis , we apply the following step . one of these following three branches keeps @xmath39 a maximal - af for the new @xmath31 and @xmath32 . * step 2 . * ( branch-1 ) remove the edge incident to @xmath98 in both @xmath31 and @xmath32 ; + ( branch-2 ) remove the edge incident to @xmath99 in both @xmath31 and @xmath32 ; + ( branch-3 ) remove the edges in @xmath114 . * some labels in @xmath92 are not siblings in @xmath31 . , we assume that @xmath98 and @xmath99 are not siblings in @xmath31 . let @xmath117 be the common parent of @xmath98 and @xmath99 in @xmath32 . * subcase 3.1 . * @xmath98 and @xmath99 are not in the same connected component in @xmath31 . because @xmath98 and @xmath99 are not in the same connected component in @xmath31 , so @xmath98 and @xmath99 can not be in the same connected component in @xmath39 . thus , at least one of edges @xmath118 $ ] and @xmath119 $ ] in @xmath32 could not be in @xmath39 . therefore , at least one of @xmath98 and @xmath99 is a single - vertex tree . * step 3.1 . * ( branch-1 ) remove the edge incident to @xmath98 in both @xmath31 and @xmath32 ; + ( branch-2 ) remove the edge incident to @xmath99 in both @xmath31 and @xmath32 . one of the two branches must keep @xmath39 still a maximal - af for the new @xmath24-forests @xmath31 and @xmath32 . * subcase 3.2 . * @xmath98 and @xmath99 are in the same connected component in @xmath31 . let @xmath120 be the path in @xmath31 that connects @xmath98 and @xmath99 , in which @xmath121 is the least common ancestor of @xmath98 and @xmath99 , @xmath122 . and let @xmath123 be the edge set that contains all edges in @xmath31 that incident to @xmath124 , @xmath125 , but not on the path @xmath126 . there are also three situations for @xmath98 and @xmath99 in @xmath39 , which are the same as that for case 2 . the first two situations that either @xmath98 or @xmath99 is a single - vertex tree in @xmath39 again cause removing the edge incident to @xmath98 or @xmath99 in @xmath31 and @xmath32 . for situation 3 : neither @xmath98 nor @xmath99 is a single - vertex tree in @xmath39 , we have to analyze detailly here . in this situation , again @xmath98 and @xmath99 are siblings in @xmath39 . moreover , all edges in @xmath123 could not be in @xmath39 . note that because the subtrees in an @xmath24-forest preserve the ancestor - descendant relation , the edges incident to @xmath121 , but not on @xmath126 could not be removed in this subcase ( there may be more than one such edge ) . * step 3.2.*(branch-1 ) remove the edge incident to @xmath98 in both @xmath31 and @xmath32 ; + ( branch-2 ) remove the edge incident to @xmath99 in both @xmath31 and @xmath32 ; + ( branch-3 ) remove the edges in @xmath123 . one of these three branches keeps @xmath39 a maximal - af for the new @xmath31 and @xmath32 . for two given rooted general @xmath24-forests @xmath31 and @xmath32 , if we iteratively apply the above process , branching accordingly based on the cases , then the process will end up with a pair @xmath127 in which @xmath32 contains no mss . when this occurs , the process applies the following step : * final step . * if @xmath32 contains no mss , then construct the ( unique ) maximal - af @xmath39 for @xmath31 and @xmath32 , and convert @xmath39 into an agreement forest for the original @xmath31 and @xmath32 . when @xmath32 contains no mss , by lemma [ simpleroot ] , we can construct the unique maximal - af @xmath39 for @xmath31 and @xmath32 in linear time . the forest @xmath39 may not be a subforest of the original @xmath31 and @xmath32 because step 1 shrinks labels . for this , we should `` expand '' the shrunk labels , in a straightforward way . note that this expanding process may be applied iteratively , but in linear time . summarizing the above discussion , we conclude with the following lemma . [ rootlem ] let @xmath31 and @xmath32 be two rooted general @xmath24-forests . if we apply steps 1 - 3.2 iteratively until @xmath32 contains no mss , then for every maximal - af @xmath39 for the original @xmath31 and @xmath32 , at least one of the branches in the process produces the maximal - af @xmath39 in its final step . fix a maximal - af @xmath39 for the original @xmath31 and @xmath32 . by the above analysis , for each of the cases , at least one of the branches in the corresponding step keeps @xmath39 a maximal - af for @xmath31 and @xmath32 . moreover , when @xmath32 contains no mss , the maximal - af for @xmath31 and @xmath32 becomes unique . combining these two facts , we can conclude that at least one of the branches in the process ends up with a pair @xmath31 and @xmath32 whose maximal - af , after the final step , is @xmath39 . since @xmath39 is an arbitrary maximal - af for @xmath31 and @xmath32 , the lemma is proved . now , according to the discussion given above and main - algorithm , we can present the detail parameterized algorithm for the para - rmaf problem , which is presented in figure [ algrooted - para ] . 4= @xmath128 we consider the correctness and the complexity of the algorithm . to make our discussion more specific , we denote by @xmath129 the original input to the algorithm , and initiate with @xmath130 for @xmath131 . the algorithm is a branch - and - search process , in which step 7 , step 8.1 , and step 8.2 contain branches . the execution of the algorithm can be depicted by a search tree @xmath132 whose leaves correspond to conclusions or solutions generated by the algorithm based on different branches . each internal node of the search tree @xmath132 corresponds to a branch in the search process at step 7 , or step 8.1 , or step 8.2 based on an instance of the problem . the root of the tree @xmath132 is on the instance that is the original input to the algorithm . we will call a path from the root to a leaf in the search tree @xmath132 a _ computational path _ in the process , which corresponds to a particular sequence of executions in the algorithm that leads to a conclusion or solution . the algorithm returns an agreement forest for the original input if and only if there is a computational path that outputs the forest . we first study the correctness of the algorithm . according to step 1 , the algorithm is correct when @xmath133 . therefore , we will assume that @xmath134 and that the algorithm is correct when the input contains no more than @xmath135 @xmath24-forests . if ord@xmath136 , then an maf @xmath33 for @xmath137 , which is a subforest of @xmath31 , must have ord@xmath138 . thus , the instance @xmath139 is a ` no ' . step 2 is correct . by lemma [ reduction rule 1 ] , step 3 is also correct . if @xmath32 has no mss , then by lemma [ simpleroot ] , the unique maximal - af @xmath33 for @xmath31 and @xmath32 can be constructed in linear time . since @xmath33 is the unique maximal - af for @xmath31 and @xmath32 , by lemma [ maximal - maf ] , the instances @xmath139 and @xmath140 have the same set of mafs . by our induction , the algorithm works correctly on @xmath140 . thus , step 4 is correct . if the instance @xmath139 reaches step 5 , then the @xmath24-forest @xmath32 has an mss @xmath92 , and none of labels in @xmath92 is a single - vertex tree in @xmath31 . steps 6 - 8 are applied on the @xmath24-forests @xmath31 and @xmath32 recursively ( during the recursion , step 3 may also be applied ) . these steps remove edges in @xmath31 and @xmath32 thus reduce the sizes of the forests ( step 6 does not remove edges , but it reduces the size of @xmath31 and @xmath32 without changing their essential structures ) . thus , the steps keep the situation , recursively , that @xmath31 and @xmath32 are subforests of @xmath141 and @xmath142 , respectively . this means that during the process of these steps , every agreement forest for @xmath40 remains an agreement forest for the original @xmath143 . these steps continue until the condition in either step 2 or step 4 is met . by the discussion above , step 2 or step 4 then will return a correct solution to the instance @xmath139 , which is either an answer ` no ' , or an agreement forest @xmath39 for @xmath40 with ord@xmath43 , which is also a solution to the original input @xmath129 . thus , no computational path in the algorithm can output an @xmath24-forest that is not a solution to the original input @xmath129 . in particular , if the original input @xmath129 is a ` no ' for the para - rmaf problem , then the algorithm alg - para - rmaf must return an answer ` no ' . on the other hand , suppose that @xmath129 is a ` yes ' and @xmath143 has an maf @xmath39 with ord@xmath43 . let @xmath33 be the maximal - af for @xmath141 and @xmath142 that has @xmath39 as a subforest ( note ord@xmath144 ) . by lemma [ rootlem ] , there is a computational path that starts with @xmath145 and @xmath146 , and applies steps 6 - 8 recursively until @xmath31 and @xmath32 satisfy the condition of step 4 . step 4 then constructs the maximal - af @xmath33 for @xmath141 and @xmath142 . by lemma [ maximal - maf ] and our induction , the recursive call in step 4 will return an agreement forest @xmath28 for @xmath143 with ord@xmath83 . therefore , the algorithm also works correctly in this case . this completes the proof of the correctness of the algorithm . now we consider the complexity of the algorithm . because of step 7 , step 8.1 , and step 8.2 , each branch in the search tree @xmath132 can make at most three ways . moreover , by examining steps 7 , 8.1 , and 8.2 , it is easy to verify that between two consecutive branches in a computational path , the value ord@xmath147 is increased by at least @xmath4 . since the algorithm will stop at step 2 when ord@xmath136 , each computational path in the search tree @xmath132 can go through at most @xmath12 branches . as a consequence , the number of leaves in the search tree @xmath132 is bounded by @xmath148 . it takes time @xmath149 to judge whether two labels are in the same connected component , where @xmath14 is the size of label - set @xmath24 . thus , it is easy to verify that between two consecutive branches , the computational path takes time @xmath150 , where @xmath151 is the number of @xmath24-forests in the original input instance . summarizing all these together , we conclude that the algorithm alg - para - rmaf@xmath139 has its running time bounded by @xmath0 . the para - rmaf problem can be solved in time @xmath0 , where @xmath14 is the size of label - set @xmath24 and @xmath151 is the number of @xmath24-forests in the input instance . the discussion for the para - umaf problem on the instance @xmath152 is similar to that for the para - rmaf problem . however , since unrooted @xmath24-forests preserve no ancestor - descendant relation , there is a little difference . two leaves in an unrooted @xmath24-forest are _ siblings _ if either they are connected by an edge or they have a common neighbor . a _ sibling set _ is a set of leaves that are siblings . a sibling set @xmath92 is _ maximal _ mss ) if either @xmath92 is the label set of a single - edge tree or the common neighbor of @xmath92 has degree at most @xmath95 . an unrooted @xmath24-forest with no mss has an even simpler structure : all its connected components are single - vertex trees . thus , we have the following lemma , which is similar to lemma [ simpleroot ] . [ simpleunroot ] let @xmath31 and @xmath32 be two unrooted general @xmath24-forests . if @xmath32 has no mss , then @xmath31 and @xmath32 have the unique maximal - af which can be constructed in linear time . thus , in the following discussion , we will assume that @xmath32 has an mss @xmath92 that none of labels in @xmath92 is a single - vertex tree in @xmath31 . and , we will assume that labels @xmath98 and @xmath99 belong to @xmath92 . in the following , we consider all possible cases for labels of @xmath92 in @xmath31 . let @xmath39 be a fixed maximal - af for @xmath31 and @xmath32 . * all labels in @xmath92 consist an mss in @xmath31 . in this case , we also treat @xmath92 as an un - decomposable structure . * step 1 . * group all labels in @xmath92 ( and their common neighbor if @xmath92 is not the label set of a single - edge tree ) into an un - decomposable structure , and mark the unit with the same label in @xmath31 and @xmath32 . to implement step 1 , if @xmath92 is the label set of a single - edge tree , then combine the labels into a single vertex that labeled by @xmath100 ; otherwise , simply remove all labels in @xmath92 and label the common neighbor of @xmath92 with @xmath100 . this step not only changes the structures of @xmath31 and @xmath32 , but also replaces the label - set @xmath24 with a new label - set @xmath103 . if we also apply this operation in the maximal - af @xmath39 , then the new @xmath39 remains a maximal - af for the new @xmath31 and @xmath32 . * case 2 . * all labels in @xmath92 are siblings in @xmath31 . obviously , the common neighbor @xmath93 of @xmath92 in @xmath31 has degree not less than @xmath153 . let @xmath154 be the vertex set that contains all vertices that are neighbors of @xmath93 , except the labels in @xmath92 . obviously , @xmath155 . let @xmath156 be the edge that between @xmath157 and @xmath93 in @xmath31 , and let @xmath158 be the edge that between @xmath159 and @xmath93 in @xmath31 . there are three situations for @xmath98 and @xmath99 in @xmath39 . situation 1 . @xmath98 is a single - vertex tree in @xmath39 . thus , removing the edge incident to @xmath98 in @xmath31 and @xmath32 keeps @xmath39 still a maximal - af for @xmath31 and @xmath32 . situation 2 . @xmath99 is a single - vertex tree in @xmath39 . thus , removing the edge incident to @xmath99 in @xmath31 and @xmath32 keeps @xmath39 still a maximal - af for @xmath31 and @xmath32 . situation 3 . neither @xmath98 nor @xmath99 is a single - vertex tree in @xmath39 . because @xmath98 and @xmath99 are siblings in @xmath32 , so @xmath98 and @xmath99 are siblings in @xmath39 . moreover , in this situation , we have the following lemma . [ allsiblings - unrooted ] let @xmath31 and @xmath32 be two unrooted general @xmath24-forests , and let @xmath92 be an mss of @xmath32 that all labels in @xmath92 are siblings in @xmath31 . for any maximal - af @xmath28 for @xmath31 and @xmath32 , if there are two labels in @xmath92 that are siblings in @xmath28 , then all labels in @xmath92 consist an mss in @xmath28 . suppose that labels @xmath98 and @xmath99 belong to @xmath92 and @xmath98 and @xmath99 are siblings in @xmath28 . at first , we show that all labels in @xmath92 are siblings in @xmath28 . case ( i ) : @xmath107 . then , @xmath108 . obviously , this case holds true . case ( ii ) : @xmath109 . suppose that label @xmath110 . if @xmath98 and @xmath111 are in different connected components in @xmath28 , then because @xmath98 and @xmath111 are siblings in @xmath32 , so at least one of @xmath112 and @xmath113 can not be in @xmath28 , where @xmath112 and @xmath113 are the edges that incident to @xmath98 and @xmath111 in @xmath32 , respectively . therefore , at least one of @xmath98 and @xmath111 is a single - vertex tree in @xmath28 . since @xmath98 and @xmath99 are in the same connected component in @xmath28 , @xmath98 is not a single - vertex tree in @xmath28 , thus , @xmath111 is a single - vertex tree in @xmath28 . by attaching the single - vertex tree @xmath111 to the common neighbor of @xmath98 and @xmath99 in @xmath28 ( if @xmath98 and @xmath99 are two labels of a single - edge tree in @xmath28 , then subdividing the edge between @xmath98 and @xmath99 by a new vertex and attaching @xmath111 to the new vertex ) , we could get an agreement forest for @xmath31 and @xmath32 that consists of fewer trees , which contracts the fact that @xmath28 is a maximal - af for @xmath31 and @xmath32 . thus , @xmath98 and @xmath111 must be in the same connected component in @xmath28 . then , because @xmath98 and @xmath111 are siblings in @xmath32 , so @xmath98 and @xmath111 are siblings in @xmath28 . therefore , all labels in @xmath92 are siblings in @xmath28 . now we show that the labels in @xmath92 consist an mss . the common neighbor of @xmath92 in @xmath32 corresponds to the common neighbor of @xmath92 in @xmath28 . because the common neighbor of @xmath92 in @xmath32 has degree at most @xmath95 , so the common neighbor of @xmath92 in @xmath28 also has degree at most @xmath95 . thus , the labels in @xmath92 consist an mss in @xmath28 . by lemma [ allsiblings - unrooted ] , in situation 3 , all labels in @xmath92 are siblings in @xmath39 . if the common neighbor of @xmath92 in @xmath32 has degree @xmath94 , then the common neighbor of @xmath92 in @xmath39 has degree @xmath94 , edges @xmath156 and @xmath158 in @xmath31 can not be in @xmath39 , both of them should be removed . if the common neighbor of @xmath92 in @xmath32 has degree @xmath95 , then the common neighbor of @xmath92 in @xmath39 has degree at most @xmath95 . but the common neighbor of @xmath92 in @xmath31 has degree at least @xmath153 , thus , at least one of @xmath156 and @xmath158 in @xmath31 could not be in @xmath39 . however , the subtrees in unrooted @xmath24-forests do not preserve any ancestor - descendant relation , we can not decide which one of @xmath156 and @xmath158 in @xmath31 should be removed . therefore , we can branch by removing @xmath156 or @xmath158 . in situation 3 , whether or not the common neighbor of @xmath92 in @xmath32 has degree @xmath94 , branching by removing @xmath156 or @xmath158 always is right . summarizing the above analysis , we can apply the following step . one of these following branches keeps @xmath39 a maximal - af for the new @xmath31 and @xmath32 . * step 2 . * ( branch-1 ) remove the edge incident to @xmath98 in both @xmath31 and @xmath32 ; + ( branch-2 ) remove the edge incident to @xmath99 in both @xmath31 and @xmath32 ; + ( branch-3 ) remove the edge @xmath156 in @xmath31 ; + ( branch-4 ) remove the edge @xmath158 in @xmath31 . * some labels in @xmath24 are not siblings in @xmath31 . w.l.o.g . , we assume @xmath98 and @xmath99 are not siblings in @xmath31 . * subcase 3.1 . * @xmath98 and @xmath99 are not in the same connected component in @xmath31 . again that at least one of @xmath98 and @xmath99 must be a single - vertex tree in @xmath39 . we can apply the following step . * step 3.1 . * ( branch-1 ) remove the edge incident to @xmath98 in both @xmath31 and @xmath32 ; + ( branch-2 ) remove the edge incident to @xmath99 in both @xmath31 and @xmath32 . * subcase 3.2 . * @xmath98 and @xmath99 are in the same connected component in @xmath31 . let @xmath160 be the unique path that connects @xmath98 an @xmath99 in @xmath31 , @xmath155 . there are also three situations for @xmath98 and @xmath99 in @xmath39 , which are the same as that for case 2 . the first two situations that either @xmath98 or @xmath99 is a single - vertex tree in @xmath39 again cause removing the edge incident to @xmath98 or @xmath99 in both @xmath31 and @xmath32 . for situation 3 : neither @xmath98 nor @xmath99 is a single - vertex tree in @xmath39 , we have to analyze in detail . because @xmath98 and @xmath99 are siblings in @xmath32 , so @xmath98 and @xmath99 are siblings in @xmath39 . if @xmath98 and @xmath99 are connected by an edge in @xmath39 , then all internal vertices in @xmath126 should be removed by the forced contraction . that is , all the edges that not on the path @xmath126 but incident to a internal vertex in @xmath126 can not be in @xmath39 , thus , all these edges should be removed . if @xmath98 and @xmath99 have a common neighbor in @xmath39 , then only one internal vertex in @xmath126 can be kept , and all the other internal vertices in @xmath126 should be removed by the forced contraction . since the subtrees in unrooted @xmath24-forests do not preserve any ancestor - descendant relation , we do not know which one of the internal vertices in @xmath126 should be kept . on the other side , we know that at least one of @xmath161 and @xmath162 should be removed by the forced contraction . that is , either the edges that incident to @xmath161 but not on @xmath126 or the edges that incident to @xmath162 but not on @xmath126 should be removed . therefore , we can branch by removing the edges that incident to @xmath161 but not on @xmath126 or the edges that incident to @xmath162 but not on @xmath126 . in this situation , whether or not @xmath98 and @xmath99 are connected by an edge in @xmath39 , this branching way is always right . summarizing the above analysis , we can apply the following step . one of these branches keeps @xmath39 a maximal - af for the new @xmath31 and @xmath32 . * step 3.2 . * ( branch-1 ) remove the edge incident to @xmath98 in both @xmath31 and @xmath32 ; + ( branch-2 ) remove the edge incident to @xmath99 in both @xmath31 and @xmath32 ; + ( branch-3 ) the edges that incident to @xmath161 but not on @xmath126 in @xmath31 ; + ( branch-4 ) the edges that incident to @xmath162 but not on @xmath126 in @xmath31 . for two given unrooted general @xmath24-forests @xmath31 and @xmath32 , if we iteratively apply the above process , branching accordingly based on the cases , then the process will end up with a pair @xmath127 in which @xmath32 contains no mss . when this occurs , we again apply the following step : * final step . * if @xmath32 contains no mss , then construct the ( unique ) maximal - af @xmath39 for @xmath31 and @xmath32 , and convert @xmath39 into an agreement forest for the original @xmath31 and @xmath32 . the above analysis finally gives the following conclusion , whose proof is exactly the same as that of lemma [ rootlem ] in subsection 4.1 . [ unrootlem ] let @xmath31 and @xmath32 be two unrooted general @xmath24-forests . if we apply steps 1 - 3.2 iteratively until @xmath32 contains no mss , then for every maximal - af @xmath39 for the original @xmath31 and @xmath32 , at least one of the branches in the process produces the maximal - af @xmath39 in its final step . now we are ready for giving the detail parameterized algorithm for the para - umaf problem , which is presented in figure [ algunrt - para ] . 4= @xmath128 similar to the one for para - rmaf , the algorithm for the para - umaf problem is a combination of the analysis given in section 4.2 and the main - algorithm . comparing the analysis for para - rmaf given in section 4.1 and the analysis for para - umaf given in section 4.2 , we can see that they only differ for case 2 and case 3.2 : case 2 and case 3.2 in section 4.1 branches into three ways while case 2 and case 3.2 in section 4.2 branch into four ways . therefore , the two algorithms only need to differ in step 7 and step 8.2 . the proof of the correctness for the algorithm alg - para - umaf proceeds in exactly the same way , based on the analysis in section 4.2 , as that for the algorithm alg - para - rmaf , which was based on the analysis in section 4.1 . for the computational complexity , since step 7 and step 8.2 of the algorithm alg - para - umaf branches into four ways , the search tree @xmath132 for the algorithm alg - para - umaf has four - way branches . therefore , we can conclude that the number of leaves in the search tree @xmath132 is bounded by @xmath163 . all other analysis is the same as that for the algorithm alg - para - rmaf . as a result , we conclude that the algorithm alg - para - umaf runs in time @xmath2 . the para - umaf problem can be solved in time @xmath2 , where @xmath14 is size of the label - set @xmath24 and @xmath151 is the number of @xmath24-forests in the input instance . in this section , we will present the approximation algorithms for app - rmaf and app - umaf first of all , we give several related definitions , which apply for both app - rmaf and app - umaf . let @xmath28 be an @xmath24-forest ( either rooted or unrooted ) , and let @xmath49 be a subset of edges in @xmath28 . because of forced contraction , we have that ord@xmath164 . an edge - subset @xmath47 of @xmath28 is an _ essential edge - set _ ee - set ) if ord@xmath165 . let @xmath49 be an arbitrary edge - subset of @xmath28 . define the _ essential subset _ of @xmath49 , denoted by @xmath166 , to be a subset of @xmath49 that is an ee - set of @xmath28 such that @xmath167 . obviously , if @xmath49 itself is an ee - set , then @xmath168 . note that for an edge - subset @xmath49 of @xmath28 which is not an ee - set , there maybe more than one essential subset of @xmath49 . our approximation algorithm for app - maf ( app - rmaf or app - umaf ) consist of a sequence of meta - steps " . an _ edge - removal meta - step _ ( or simply meta - step ) of an algorithm is a collection of consecutive computational steps in the algorithm that on an instance @xmath169 of app - maf removes certain edges in the forests in @xmath169 ( and applies the forced contraction ) . our approximation algorithms for app - maf ( app - rmaf or app - umaf ) have the following general framework . 4= @xmath128 the performance of the approximation algorithm alg - app - maf heavily depends on the quality of the meta - steps we employ in step 3 of the algorithm . thus , we introduce the following concept that measures the quality of a meta - step , where @xmath170 is an arbitrary real number . * definition - r . * let @xmath171 be an instance of app - maf ( app - rmaf or app - umaf ) , and let @xmath172 be an edge - removal meta - step that removes a set @xmath173 of edges in the forests in @xmath174 . meta - step @xmath172 keeps a _ @xmath35 if the set @xmath173 contains a subset @xmath175 of edges in @xmath31 such that no edge in @xmath176 is in any agreement forest for @xmath177 , and for each agreement forest @xmath28 for @xmath174 , there always exists an ee - set @xmath178 of @xmath31 , @xmath179 , @xmath180 , and no edge in @xmath178 is in @xmath28 . * remark 1 . * @xmath175 contains all edges in @xmath173 that in @xmath31 . @xmath175 may not be an ee - set of @xmath31 , but @xmath178 should be an ee - set of @xmath31 . * remark 2 . * by definition , if an edge - removal meta - step removes only edges that not in any agreement forest for the instance , then this meta - step keeps ratio @xmath35 for any @xmath170 . define an edge - removal meta - step is _ safe _ if it keeps ratio @xmath35 for any @xmath170 . define the order of an maf for the instance @xmath181 of app - maf ( app - rmaf or app - umaf ) to be the _ optimal order _ for the instance , denoted @xmath182 . [ equation ] let @xmath171 be an instance of app - maf ( app - rmaf or app - umaf ) , and let @xmath172 be an edge - removal meta - step on @xmath174 producing instance @xmath183 . if @xmath172 keeps ratio @xmath35 , then @xmath184 . let @xmath28 be a fixed maf for @xmath171 . according to definition - r , there exists an edge - set @xmath185 that no edge in @xmath186 is in any agreement forest for @xmath177 . thus , instances @xmath183 and @xmath177 have the same collection of solutions . because @xmath187 , so @xmath183 and @xmath188 also have the same collection of solutions . @xmath189 is the same as the optimal order for @xmath188 . since @xmath28 is an agreement forest for @xmath181 , in order to construct an agreement forest for @xmath188 by removing edges from @xmath28 , we just need removing the edges from @xmath28 that are not in @xmath190 to make the new @xmath28 be a subforest of @xmath190 . here , we denote by @xmath191 the subset of @xmath192 in which the edges are in @xmath28 , and denote by @xmath193 the subset of @xmath192 in which the edges are not in @xmath28 . obviously , @xmath194 is an agreement forest for @xmath188 . in the following , we analyze the order of @xmath194 detailly . according to definition - r , we have that for @xmath28 , there exists an ee - set @xmath178 of @xmath31 , @xmath179 , @xmath195 , and no edge in @xmath178 is in @xmath28 . note that we can easily get an essential subset of @xmath185 that contains @xmath178 , thus , we can assume that @xmath196 . therefore , we have that @xmath197 and @xmath198 . because @xmath199 , so @xmath200 . therefore , @xmath201 . since @xmath202 and @xmath203 , we have @xmath184 . [ ratio ] let @xmath204 be an instance of app - maf ( app - rmaf or app - umaf ) , and let @xmath57 be an arbitrary real number . if each meta - step in step 3 of algorithm alg - app - maf keeps ratio not greater than @xmath205 and that the algorithm alg - app - maf halts on the instance @xmath174 , then the output of alg - app - maf is an agreement forest for @xmath174 whose order is at most @xmath205 times the optimal value for @xmath174 . suppose the sequence of meta - steps in the algorithm is @xmath206 , where for each @xmath38 , @xmath207 , meta - step @xmath208 removes an edge - set @xmath209 from the instance @xmath210 produces an instance @xmath211 . by the judgement condition in step 3 , we can make sure that @xmath212 is a subforest of @xmath213 . thus , @xmath212 is an maf for @xmath214 , ord@xmath215 . because each meta - step @xmath208 in @xmath92 , @xmath207 , removes certain edges from forests in @xmath216 , so every agreement forest for @xmath217 is also an agreement forest for @xmath216 . therefore , the forest @xmath212 returned by step 4 is also an agreement forest for the original input instance @xmath218 . for each meta - step @xmath219 , @xmath220 , by lemma [ equation ] , there is @xmath221 . note that , @xmath222 . therefore , for each meta - step @xmath219 , we have the inequality @xmath223 . then , we add up these inequalities for all meta - steps in @xmath92 , and get @xmath224 , where @xmath225 . from this , we can easily get @xmath226 , which proves the theorem . we develop meta - steps for app - rmaf in this subsection . thus , all x - forests considered in this subsection are rooted . as given in the algorithm alg - app - maf ( see figure [ alg - app ] ) , for each execution of step 3 in the algorithm , we are given a fixed integer @xmath227 and an instance @xmath204 of app - rmaf , which is a collection of rooted x - forests , with @xmath31 is a subforest of @xmath228 , and , as long as @xmath229 , meta - steps are applied on @xmath31 and @xmath37 . in the following , we show how these meta - steps are constructed based on different structures of @xmath31 and @xmath37 . let @xmath39 be a fixed maf for @xmath204 , and let @xmath33 be a maximal - af for @xmath31 and @xmath37 that contains @xmath39 . since @xmath39 is a subforest of @xmath33 , if an edge @xmath45 of @xmath31 is not in @xmath33 , then @xmath45 is also not in @xmath39 . an execution of reduction rule 1 on @xmath31 and @xmath37 can be regarded as an edge - removal meta - step . by lemma [ reduction rule 1 ] and remark 2 of definition - r , we can easily get the following lemma . [ reduction rule 1 safe ] reduction rule 1 is safe . by lemma [ simpleroot ] , if @xmath37 has no mss , then @xmath31 and @xmath37 have an unique maf @xmath28 , which either is isomorphic to @xmath37 or consists of a collection of single - vertex trees . and by a series of executions of reduction rule 1 on @xmath31 and @xmath37 , there is @xmath230 , which satisfies the judgement condition of step 3 in algorithm alg - app - maf . therefore , in the following discussion , we will assume that @xmath37 has an mss @xmath92 . note that the instances in our discussion are strongly reducible , so none of labels in @xmath92 is a single - vertex tree in @xmath31 . , we will assume that labels @xmath98 and @xmath99 belong to @xmath92 . * case 1 . * all labels in @xmath92 consist an mss in @xmath31 . * meta - step 1 . * group all labels in @xmath92 and their parent into an un - decomposable structure , and mark the unit with the same label in @xmath31 and @xmath37 . the implementation of meta - step 1 is the same as that of step 1 for para - rmaf . this meta - step can be regarded as a special meta - step that does not remove any edges in the instance . instead , it groups certain structures in some x - forests into un - decomposable units . using the notation in definition - r , @xmath231 . and , we have [ meta - step 1 ] meta - step 1 is safe . this meta - step may lead a subtle problem in the following discussion . because meta - step 1 changes the label - sets of @xmath31 and @xmath37 , so the label - sets of @xmath31 and @xmath37 are different from the label - sets of the other forests in the instance . thus , there is ambiguity of the sentence there exists an maf for the new instance " . note that this operation is just simply for notational convenience . we still can construct an maf for the new instance if we expand " these combined leaves in @xmath31 and @xmath37 . therefore , in the following discussion , we can simply say that there exists an maf @xmath39 for the new instance , although the label - sets of the forests in the instance are different . note again that in the maf @xmath39 for the instance , there maybe no such an un - decomposable structure , because some labels in @xmath92 maybe in different connected components in @xmath39 . however , the maximal - af @xmath33 for @xmath31 and @xmath37 that contains @xmath39 must have such an un - decomposable structure . therefore , in the following discussion , we can assume that the maximal - af @xmath33 for @xmath31 and @xmath37 that contains @xmath39 has been applied all possible group " operations so that @xmath31 , @xmath37 , and @xmath33 have the same new label - set . similarly , even though @xmath39 and @xmath33 have different label - sets , we can also simply say that @xmath33 contains @xmath39 , because we just need to expand these combined leaves in @xmath33 . let @xmath232 be the forest that getting by expanding these combined leaves in @xmath33 . obviously , @xmath232 and @xmath39 have the same label - set , and @xmath39 is a subforest of @xmath232 . therefore , for any edge @xmath45 that in @xmath31 or @xmath37 , if @xmath45 is not in @xmath33 , then @xmath45 is not in @xmath232 . thus , @xmath45 is also not in @xmath39 . * case 2 . * all labels in @xmath92 are siblings in @xmath31 . let @xmath104 be the common parent of @xmath92 in @xmath31 . in this case , there must exist a vertex @xmath30 in @xmath31 which is a child of @xmath104 but not belongs to @xmath92 ( @xmath30 maybe a non - leaf ) . let @xmath45 be the edge that between @xmath104 and @xmath30 in @xmath31 . * meta - step 2 . * remove the edges that incident to @xmath98 and @xmath99 in @xmath31 and @xmath37 , and remove edge @xmath45 . [ meta - step 2 ] meta - step 2 keeps ratio @xmath1 . let @xmath112 and @xmath233 be the edges that incident to @xmath98 and @xmath99 in @xmath31 , respectively , and let @xmath234 and @xmath235 be the edges that incident to @xmath98 and @xmath99 in @xmath37 , respectively . using the notations in definition - r , we have @xmath236 and @xmath237 . in the @xmath24-forest @xmath238 , labels @xmath98 and @xmath99 are single - vertex trees . thus , every maximal - af for @xmath238 and @xmath37 have @xmath98 and @xmath99 as single - vertex trees , no edges in @xmath239 can be in any maximal - af for @xmath238 and @xmath37 . because every agreement forest for @xmath177 must be a subforest of a maximal - af for @xmath238 and @xmath37 , so no edges in @xmath239 can be in any agreement forest for @xmath177 . there are three situations for @xmath98 and @xmath99 in the maximal - af @xmath33 for @xmath31 and @xmath37 which contains @xmath39 . situation 1 . @xmath98 is a single - vertex tree in @xmath33 . thus , @xmath112 is not in @xmath33 , and @xmath112 is also not in @xmath39 . therefore , we can pick @xmath240 as the set @xmath241 , which satisfies : @xmath242 , @xmath243 . note that @xmath244 is not greater than @xmath245 . moreover , since @xmath31 is irreducible and @xmath98 is not a single - vertex tree in @xmath31 , the set @xmath241 is an ee - set of @xmath31 . therefore , for the agreement forest @xmath39 , the set @xmath241 satisfies all conditions in definition - r to make meta - step 2 to keep a ratio @xmath1 . situation 2 . @xmath99 is a single - vertex tree in @xmath33 . thus , @xmath233 is not in @xmath33 , and @xmath233 is also not in @xmath39 . then similarly we let @xmath246 and can verify that for the agreement forest @xmath39 , the set @xmath241 satisfies all conditions in definition - r to make meta - step 2 to keep a ratio @xmath1 . situation 3 . @xmath98 and @xmath99 are siblings in @xmath33 . then , by lemma [ allsiblings - rooted ] , the labels of @xmath92 consist an mss in @xmath33 . in order to make the labels of @xmath92 consist an mss in @xmath31 , edge @xmath45 should be removed . that is , in this situation , edge @xmath45 is not in @xmath33 , and @xmath45 is also not in @xmath39 . thus , in this situation , we let @xmath247 , and verify easily that for the agreement forest @xmath39 , the set @xmath241 satisfies all conditions in definition - r to make meta - step 2 to keep a ratio @xmath1 . this verifies that the set @xmath175 satisfies all conditions in definition - r to make meta - step 2 to keep a ratio @xmath1 . thus , meta - step 2 keeps ratio @xmath1 . * some labels in @xmath92 are not siblings in @xmath31 . w.l.o.g . , we assume @xmath98 and @xmath99 are not siblings in @xmath31 . * subcase 3.1 . * @xmath98 and @xmath99 are in different connected components in @xmath31 . * meta - step 3.1 . * remove the edges incident to @xmath98 and @xmath99 in both @xmath31 and @xmath37 . [ meta - step 3.1 ] meta - step 3.1 keeps ratio @xmath23 . let @xmath112 and @xmath233 be the edges that incident to @xmath98 and @xmath99 in @xmath31 , respectively , and let @xmath234 and @xmath235 be the edges that incident to @xmath98 and @xmath99 in @xmath37 , respectively . using the notations in definition - r , we have @xmath248 and @xmath249 . in the @xmath24-forest @xmath238 , labels @xmath98 and @xmath99 are single - vertex trees . thus , every maximal - af for @xmath238 and @xmath37 have @xmath98 and @xmath99 as single - vertex trees , no edges in @xmath239 can be in any maximal - af for @xmath238 and @xmath37 . because every agreement forest for @xmath177 must be a subforest of a maximal - af for @xmath238 and @xmath37 , so no edges in @xmath239 can be in any agreement forest for @xmath177 . there are two situations for @xmath98 and @xmath99 in the maximal - af @xmath33 for @xmath31 and @xmath37 which contains @xmath39 . situation 1 . @xmath98 is a single - vertex tree in @xmath33 . thus , @xmath112 is not in @xmath33 , and @xmath112 is also not in @xmath39 . therefore , we can pick @xmath240 as the set @xmath241 , which satisfies : @xmath242 , @xmath250 . moreover , since @xmath31 is irreducible and @xmath98 is not a single - vertex tree in @xmath31 , the set @xmath241 is an ee - set of @xmath31 . therefore , for the agreement forest @xmath39 , the set @xmath241 satisfies all conditions in definition - r to make meta - step 3.1 to keep a ratio @xmath23 . situation 2 . @xmath99 is a single - vertex tree in @xmath33 . thus , @xmath233 is not in @xmath33 , and @xmath233 is also not in @xmath39 . then similarly we let @xmath246 and can verify that for the agreement forest @xmath39 , the set @xmath241 satisfies all conditions in definition - r to make meta - step 3.1 to keep a ratio @xmath23 . this verifies that the set @xmath175 satisfies all conditions in definition - r to make meta - step 3.1 to keep a ratio @xmath23 . thus , meta - step 3.1 keeps ratio @xmath23 . * subcase 3.2 . * @xmath98 and @xmath99 are in the same connected component in @xmath31 . let @xmath251 be the path that connects @xmath98 and @xmath99 in @xmath31 , and let @xmath121 be the least common ancestor of @xmath98 and @xmath99 in @xmath31 , @xmath252 . let @xmath123 be the edge set that contains all edge that incident to @xmath124 , @xmath116 , @xmath253 , but not on the path @xmath126 , and let @xmath45 be an arbitrary edge of @xmath123 . * meta - step 3.2 . * remove the edges incident to @xmath98 and @xmath99 in both @xmath31 and @xmath37 , and remove edge @xmath45 . [ meta - step 3.2 ] meta - step 3.2 keeps ratio @xmath1 . let @xmath112 and @xmath233 be the edges that incident to @xmath98 and @xmath99 in @xmath31 , respectively , and let @xmath234 and @xmath235 be the edges that incident to @xmath98 and @xmath99 in @xmath37 , respectively . using the notations in definition - r , we have @xmath236 and @xmath237 . in the @xmath24-forest @xmath238 , labels @xmath98 and @xmath99 are single - vertex trees . thus , every maximal - af for @xmath238 and @xmath37 have @xmath98 and @xmath99 as single - vertex trees , no edges in @xmath239 can be in any maximal - af for @xmath238 and @xmath37 . because every agreement forest for @xmath177 must be a subforest of a maximal - af for @xmath238 and @xmath37 , so no edges in @xmath239 can be in any agreement forest for @xmath177 . there are three situations for @xmath98 and @xmath99 in the maximal - af @xmath33 for @xmath31 and @xmath37 which contains @xmath39 . situation 1 . @xmath98 is a single - vertex tree in @xmath33 . thus , @xmath112 is not in @xmath33 , and @xmath112 is also not in @xmath39 . therefore , we can pick @xmath240 as the set @xmath241 , which satisfies : @xmath242 , @xmath243 . moreover , since @xmath31 is irreducible and @xmath98 is not a single - vertex tree in @xmath31 , the set @xmath241 is an ee - set of @xmath31 . therefore , for the agreement forest @xmath39 , the set @xmath241 satisfies all conditions in definition - r to make meta - step 3.2 to keep a ratio @xmath1 . situation 2 . @xmath99 is a single - vertex tree in @xmath33 . thus , @xmath233 is not in @xmath33 , and @xmath233 is also not in @xmath39 . then similarly we let @xmath246 and can verify that for the agreement forest @xmath39 , the set @xmath241 satisfies all conditions in definition - r to make meta - step 3.2 to keep a ratio @xmath1 . situation 3 . @xmath98 and @xmath99 are siblings in @xmath33 . in order to make labels @xmath98 and @xmath99 be siblings in @xmath31 , all the edges in @xmath123 should be removed . that is , in this situation , all the edges in @xmath123 are not in @xmath33 , so all the edges in @xmath123 are not in @xmath39 . here , we just remove the edge @xmath45 in @xmath123 , so we let @xmath247 , and verify easily that for the agreement forest @xmath39 , the set @xmath241 satisfies all conditions in definition - r to make meta - step 3.2 to keep a ratio @xmath1 . this verifies that the set @xmath175 satisfies all conditions in definition - r to make meta - step 3.2 to keep a ratio @xmath1 . thus , meta - step 3.2 keeps ratio @xmath1 . for two rooted x - forests @xmath31 and @xmath37 , if we iteratively apply the above process based on the cases , then the process will end up that @xmath31 is isomorphic to @xmath37 . ( to here , we also expand " these combined labels in @xmath31 and @xmath37 . ) now , combining the general framework given in figure [ alg - app ] and the meta - steps given above , we are ready to present our approximation algorithm for app - rmaf . 4= @xmath128 [ alg - app - rmaf - ratio ] algorithm alg - app - rmaf is @xmath1-approximation algorithm for the app - rmaf problem that runs in time @xmath254 , where @xmath14 is the size of the label - set @xmath24 and @xmath151 is the number of forests in the input instance . by lemmas [ meta - step 1 ] , [ meta - step 2 ] , [ meta - step 3.1 ] , and [ meta - step 3.2 ] , each of the meta - steps keeps a ratio bounded by @xmath1 . by theorem [ ratio ] , if the algorithm alg - app - maf uses these meta - steps in step 3 , and halts on an instance @xmath174 of app - rmaf , then the algorithm alg - app - rmaf produces an agreement forest for the instance @xmath174 whose order is bounded by @xmath1 times the optimal value for @xmath174 . therefore , to show that the algorithm alg - app - rmaf is a @xmath1-approximation algorithm for the app - rmaf problem , it suffices to show that on any instance @xmath174 of app - rmaf , the algorithm alg - app - rmaf runs in time @xmath255 . by the above discussion , as long as @xmath229 , at least one of the above meta - steps is applicable . let @xmath256 . then , the number of vertices plus the number of edges in an x - forest is @xmath149 . by the algorithm alg - app - rmaf , a meta - step in step 3 is applied on @xmath31 and @xmath37 only when @xmath229 . under the condition @xmath229 , it is easy to verify that each of the meta - steps 2 , 3.1 , 3.2 , and reduction rule 1 removes at least one edge in @xmath257 . therefore , the total number of times these meta - steps can be applied is bounded by @xmath149 . now consider meta - step 1 . initially , each vertex in @xmath31 and @xmath37 is an un - decomposable unit . thus , the total number of un - decomposable units in @xmath257 is @xmath149 . each application of meta - step 1 groups three un - decomposable units into a single un - decomposable unit , in each of @xmath31 and @xmath37 . therefore , meta - step 1 can be applied at most @xmath149 times . summarizing the above discussion , we conclude that if the algorithm alg - app - rmaf uses these meta - steps in step 3 , then the number of times meta - steps are applied in each execution of step 3 is @xmath149 . moreover , it is not very difficult to see that with careful implementation of the data structure representing x - forests , the running time of each of the meta - steps , can be bounded by @xmath149 . therefore , the running time of the algorithm is @xmath254 , where @xmath256 and @xmath151 is the number of x - forests in the input instance . in this subsection , we develop meta - steps for app - umaf . let @xmath39 be a fixed maf for the instance @xmath171 of app - umaf , and let @xmath33 be a maximal - af for @xmath31 and @xmath37 that contains @xmath39 . by lemma [ simpleunroot ] , if @xmath37 has no mss , then @xmath31 and @xmath37 have an unique maf , which consists of a collection of single - vertex trees . and by a series of executions of reduction rule 1 on @xmath31 and @xmath37 , we can get that @xmath258 , which satisfies the judgement condition of step 3 in algorithm alg - app - maf . therefore , in the following discussion , we will assume that @xmath37 has an mss @xmath92 . note that none of labels in @xmath92 is a single - vertex tree in @xmath31 . , we will also assume that labels @xmath98 and @xmath99 belong to @xmath92 . * case 1 . * all labels in @xmath92 consist an mss in @xmath31 . * meta - step 1 . * group all labels in @xmath92 ( and their common neighbor if @xmath92 is not the label set of a single - edge tree ) into an un - decomposable structure , and mark the unit with the same label in @xmath31 and @xmath32 . the implementation of meta - step 1 is the same as that of step 1 for para - umaf . this meta - step also can be regarded as a special meta - step that does not remove any edges in the instance . and , we have [ unrooted meta - step 1 ] meta - step 1 is safe . * case 2 . * all labels in @xmath92 are siblings in @xmath31 . obviously , the common neighbor @xmath93 of @xmath92 in @xmath31 has degree greater than @xmath259 . let @xmath156 and @xmath260 be two arbitrarily edges in @xmath31 that incident to @xmath93 but not incident to the labels in @xmath92 . * meta - step 2 . * remove the edges that incident to @xmath98 and @xmath99 in both @xmath31 and @xmath32 , and remove edges @xmath156 and @xmath260 . [ unrooted meta - step 2 ] meta - step 2 keeps ratio @xmath3 . let @xmath112 and @xmath233 be the edges that incident to @xmath98 and @xmath99 in @xmath31 , respectively , and let @xmath234 and @xmath235 be the edges that incident to @xmath98 and @xmath99 in @xmath37 , respectively . using the notations in definition - r , we have @xmath261 and @xmath262 . in the @xmath24-forest @xmath238 , labels @xmath98 and @xmath99 are single - vertex trees . thus , every maximal - af for @xmath238 and @xmath37 have @xmath98 and @xmath99 as single - vertex trees , no edges in @xmath239 can be in any maximal - af for @xmath238 and @xmath37 . because every agreement forest for @xmath177 must be a subforest of a maximal - af for @xmath238 and @xmath37 , so no edges in @xmath239 can be in any agreement forest for @xmath177 . there are three situations for @xmath98 and @xmath99 in the maximal - af @xmath33 for @xmath31 and @xmath37 which contains @xmath39 . situation 1 . @xmath98 is a single - vertex tree in @xmath33 . thus , @xmath112 is not in @xmath33 , and @xmath112 is also not in @xmath39 . therefore , we can pick @xmath240 as the set @xmath241 , which satisfies : @xmath242 , @xmath263 . note that @xmath244 is not greater than @xmath264 . moreover , since @xmath31 is irreducible and @xmath98 is not a single - vertex tree in @xmath31 , the set @xmath241 is an ee - set of @xmath31 . therefore , for the agreement forest @xmath39 , the set @xmath241 satisfies all conditions in definition - r to make meta - step 2 to keep a ratio @xmath3 . situation 2 . @xmath99 is a single - vertex tree in @xmath33 . thus , @xmath233 is not in @xmath33 , and @xmath233 is also not in @xmath39 . then similarly we let @xmath246 and can verify that for the agreement forest @xmath39 , the set @xmath241 satisfies all conditions in definition - r to make meta - step 2 to keep a ratio @xmath3 . situation 3 . @xmath98 and @xmath99 are siblings in @xmath33 . by lemma [ allsiblings - unrooted ] , all labels of @xmath92 are siblings in @xmath33 . because the labels of @xmath92 consist an mss in @xmath37 , so the labels of @xmath92 consist an mss in @xmath33 . in order to make the labels of @xmath92 consist an mss in @xmath31 , the degree of @xmath93 can not be greater than @xmath259 . that is , at least one of edges @xmath156 and @xmath260 in @xmath31 should be removed . if @xmath156 is not in @xmath33 , then @xmath156 is also not in @xmath39 . let @xmath265 , we can easily verify that for the agreement forest @xmath39 , the set @xmath241 satisfies all conditions in definition - r to make meta - step 2 to keep a ratio @xmath3 . the same argument is applied to the case that @xmath260 is not in @xmath33 . this verifies that the set @xmath175 satisfies all conditions in definition - r to make meta - step 2 to keep a ratio @xmath3 . thus , meta - step 2 keeps ratio @xmath3 . * some labels in @xmath92 are not siblings in @xmath31 . , we will assume that labels @xmath98 and @xmath99 are not siblings in @xmath31 . * subcase 3.1 . * @xmath98 and @xmath99 are in different connected components in @xmath31 . * meta - step 3.1 . * remove the edges incident to @xmath98 and @xmath99 in both @xmath31 and @xmath37 . [ unrooted meta - step 3.1 . ] meta - step 3.1 keeps ratio @xmath23 . let @xmath112 and @xmath233 be the edges that incident to @xmath98 and @xmath99 in @xmath31 , respectively , and let @xmath234 and @xmath235 be the edges that incident to @xmath98 and @xmath99 in @xmath37 , respectively . using the notations in definition - r , we have @xmath248 and @xmath249 . in the @xmath24-forest @xmath238 , labels @xmath98 and @xmath99 are single - vertex trees . thus , every maximal - af for @xmath238 and @xmath37 have @xmath98 and @xmath99 as single - vertex trees , no edges in @xmath239 can be in any maximal - af for @xmath238 and @xmath37 . because every agreement forest for @xmath177 must be a subforest of a maximal - af for @xmath238 and @xmath37 , so no edges in @xmath239 can be in any agreement forest for @xmath177 . there are two situations for @xmath98 and @xmath99 in the maximal - af @xmath33 for @xmath31 and @xmath37 which contains @xmath39 . situation 1 . @xmath98 is a single - vertex tree in @xmath33 . thus , @xmath112 is not in @xmath33 , so @xmath112 also is not in @xmath39 . therefore , we can pick @xmath240 as the set @xmath241 , which satisfies : @xmath242 , @xmath250 . moreover , since @xmath31 is irreducible and @xmath98 is not a single - vertex tree in @xmath31 , the set @xmath241 is an ee - set of @xmath31 . therefore , for the agreement forest @xmath39 , the set @xmath241 satisfies all conditions in definition - r to make meta - step 3.1 to keep a ratio @xmath23 . situation 2 . @xmath99 is a single - vertex tree in @xmath33 . thus , @xmath233 is not in @xmath33 , so @xmath233 also is not in @xmath39 . then similarly we let @xmath246 and can verify that for the agreement forest @xmath39 , the set @xmath241 satisfies all conditions in definition - r to make meta - step 3.1 to keep a ratio @xmath23 . this verifies that the set @xmath175 satisfies all conditions in definition - r to make meta - step 3.1 to keep a ratio @xmath23 . thus , meta - step 3.1 keeps ratio @xmath23 . * subcase 3.2 . * @xmath98 and @xmath99 are in the same connected component in @xmath31 . let @xmath251 be the path that connects @xmath98 and @xmath99 in @xmath31 . and let @xmath123 be the edge set that contains all edge that incident to @xmath124 , @xmath116 , but not on the path @xmath126 . obviously , @xmath266 . let @xmath156 and @xmath260 be two arbitrary edges in @xmath123 . * meta - step 3.2 . * remove the edges that incident to @xmath98 and @xmath99 in both @xmath31 and @xmath37 , and remove edges @xmath156 and @xmath260 in @xmath31 . [ meta - step 3.2 . ] meta - step 3.2 keeps ratio @xmath3 . let @xmath112 and @xmath233 be the edges that incident to @xmath98 and @xmath99 in @xmath31 , respectively , and let @xmath234 and @xmath235 be the edges that incident to @xmath98 and @xmath99 in @xmath37 , respectively . using the notations in definition - r , we have @xmath261 and @xmath262 . in the @xmath24-forest @xmath238 , labels @xmath98 and @xmath99 are single - vertex trees . thus , every maximal - af for @xmath238 and @xmath37 have @xmath98 and @xmath99 as single - vertex trees , no edges in @xmath239 can be in any maximal - af for @xmath238 and @xmath37 . because every agreement forest for @xmath177 must be a subforest of a maximal - af for @xmath238 and @xmath37 , so no edges in @xmath239 can be in any agreement forest for @xmath177 . there are three situations for @xmath98 and @xmath99 in the maximal - af @xmath33 for @xmath31 and @xmath37 which contains @xmath39 . situation 1 . @xmath98 is a single - vertex tree in @xmath33 . thus , @xmath112 is not in @xmath33 , and @xmath112 is also not in @xmath39 . therefore , we can pick @xmath240 as the set @xmath241 , which satisfies : @xmath242 , @xmath263 . note that @xmath244 is always less than @xmath264 . moreover , since @xmath31 is irreducible and @xmath98 is not a single - vertex tree in @xmath31 , the set @xmath241 is an ee - set of @xmath31 . therefore , for the agreement forest @xmath39 , the set @xmath241 satisfies all conditions in definition - r to make meta - step 3.2 to keep a ratio @xmath3 . situation 2 . @xmath99 is a single - vertex tree in @xmath33 . thus , @xmath233 is not in @xmath33 , and @xmath233 is also not in @xmath39 . then similarly we let @xmath246 and can verify that for the agreement forest @xmath39 , the set @xmath241 satisfies all conditions in definition - r to make meta - step 3.2 to keep a ratio @xmath3 . situation 3 . @xmath98 and @xmath99 are siblings in @xmath33 . thus , @xmath98 and @xmath99 either are connected by an edge or have a common neighbor in @xmath33 . if @xmath98 and @xmath99 are connected by an edge in @xmath33 , then all edges in @xmath123 should be removed . here , we just remove edges @xmath156 and @xmath260 , and let @xmath267 , we can easily verify that for the agreement forest @xmath39 , the set @xmath241 satisfies all conditions in definition - r to make meta - step 3.2 to keep a ratio @xmath3 . if @xmath98 and @xmath99 have a common neighbor in @xmath33 , then at least one of @xmath156 and @xmath260 should be removed . if @xmath156 is not in @xmath33 , then @xmath156 is also not in @xmath39 . let @xmath265 , we can verify that for the agreement forest @xmath39 , the set @xmath241 satisfies all conditions in definition - r to make meta - step 3.2 to keep a ratio @xmath3 . the same argument is applied to the case that @xmath260 is not in @xmath33 . this verifies that the set @xmath175 satisfies all conditions in definition - r to make meta - step 3.2 to keep a ratio @xmath3 . thus , meta - step 3.2 keeps ratio @xmath3 . for two unrooted general x - forests @xmath31 and @xmath37 , if we iteratively apply the above process based on the cases , then the process will end up that @xmath31 is isomorphic to @xmath37 . ( to here , we also expand " these combined labels in @xmath31 and @xmath37 . ) the approximation algorithm alg - app - umaf for app - umaf proceeds similarly with the alg - app - rmaf for app - rmaf . due to limit space , we will not present the details of alg - app - umaf here . for app - umaf , we have the following theorem , whose proof is similar to that for theorem [ alg - app - rmaf - ratio ] . [ alg - app - umaf - ratio ] algorithm alg - app - umaf is @xmath3-approximation algorithm for the app - umaf problem that runs in time @xmath254 , where @xmath14 is the size of the label - set @xmath24 and @xmath151 is the number of forests in the input instance . we have implemented our algorithms alg - para - rmaf and alg - app - rmaf in c++ , obtain programs pmaf and amaf , respectively . let @xmath171 be an instance of maf . the program pmaf searches for the optimal value for the instance @xmath174 by starting with a lower bound @xmath12 of opt@xmath268 and increasing @xmath12 until it can return an agreement forest for @xmath174 whose order is not greater than @xmath12 . firstly , we use the program amaf to get an agreement forest whose order is @xmath269 . according to the theoretical analysis given above , we have that @xmath269 is not greater than @xmath1 times the optimal value for the instance . therefore , @xmath270 , and the program pmaf can start with @xmath271 . we test our programs for both simulated and biological data on a 3.06ghz pentium(r ) dual - core cpu system with 2 gb of ram running windows xp . the simulated data are generated by using the following three - stage approach . firstly , generating a random rooted binary phylogenetic tree with @xmath14 labels . our way of generating random rooted binary phylogenetic trees is the same as that in @xcite . we use the integers from @xmath4 to @xmath14 to represent the @xmath14 irrelevant labels . at first , a bipartition on the @xmath14 integers is created by randomly cutting the list into two non - empty parts . this bipartition represents the edges adjacent to the root node of the tree being constructed . then , each of the two induced partitions is randomly split into two lists to create a further bipartition of these sets . new bipartitions are then created recursively by cutting elements of previously created bipartitions into two sets until the bipartitions only consists of singleton elements . thus , the tree is created by starting at the root and creating bipartitions ( edges ) until the leaf nodes are reached . the labels of the leaves are the singleton elements in the bipartitions , respectively . to maintain the consistency with the previous definition of phylogenetic trees , a new leaf labeled with @xmath34 would be attached to the root of the tree . and the leaf @xmath34 will be regarded as the new root of this tree . secondly , transforming the binary tree to a general tree . we randomly choose some internal edges in the binary tree , whose two ends are both internal vertices , to contract . the contracting operation is applied by removing the two endpoints @xmath272 and @xmath30 of the edge and introducing a new vertex which is adjacent to every vertex that is adjacent to at least one of @xmath272 and @xmath30 . the number of edges that are contracted is also random . finally , transforming the original tree into other resulting trees by using a known number of spr operations . suppose @xmath273 resulting trees are constructed by applying @xmath274 spr operations on the original tree @xmath275 , respectively . then the instance which consists of the original tree @xmath275 and the @xmath273 resulting trees @xmath276 has an maf whose order could not be greater than @xmath277 . note that there are two reasons for that the order of the maf for the instance could not be greater than @xmath277 : ( 1 ) . the sequence of spr operations we use to obtain @xmath67 from @xmath275 , @xmath278 , may not be the shortest such sequence , that is , the order of the maf for @xmath275 and @xmath67 maybe less than @xmath279 ; ( 2 ) . the construction of @xmath67 and @xmath280 may use a same spr operation , @xmath281 , that is , the order of the maf for @xmath67 and @xmath280 maybe less than @xmath282 . in the following discussion , we denote by t@xmath283 a set of instances of maf , each instance of which consists of @xmath151 phylogenetic trees with @xmath14-leaves . we run our program pmaf on the simulated data set t@xmath283 , where @xmath284 and @xmath285 . for each instance set t@xmath283 , @xmath284 , @xmath285 , it contains at least @xmath286 instances . figure [ average - time ] shows the mean running time of pmaf on these simulated instances with the given order of maf . the slopes of the curves in the figure are always between @xmath4 and @xmath287 , which indicating that the actual running time of the algorithm is between its worst - case running time of @xmath0 and its best running time @xmath288 ( in the best case , all branches in the search tree of the algorithm for the instance always make two ways ) . the running time of amaf on each instance of the simulated data set t@xmath283 , where @xmath284 and @xmath285 , is always less than one second . figure [ worst - ratio ] shows the worst approximation ratio of amaf for the simulated data set t@xmath283 , where @xmath284 and @xmath285 . the top points of the curves in the figure are always not greater than @xmath1 , which indicating that the actual approximation ratio of the algorithm is less than @xmath1 . moreover , as can be seen from the figure , when the order of maf is greater than @xmath289 , there is a down trending for the ratio of the algorithm with the order of maf increasing . this is because as the increasing of the order of maf , the number of right " edges in a tree , which are the edges that are not in the maf for the instance , is increasing . thus , the probability of removing right " edges by the algorithm is increasing . therefore , the ratio of the algorithm trends down . we run pmaf on the protein tree data set @xcite . the protein tree data set consists of 22,437 binary protein trees , each constructed from a set of proteins covering from 4 to 144 microbial genomes . among these trees , there are @xmath290 protein trees covering all 144 microbial genomes . thus , the @xmath290 trees have the same label - set , and it is of biological meaning to compare these trees . we create extensive instances for the @xmath290 protein trees . the instances are created by the following way . firstly , create a random label - set @xmath291 with fixed size not greater than @xmath292 . secondly , construct the subtrees with label - set @xmath291 of the @xmath290 protein trees , respectively . finally , randomly choose a fixed number of subtrees to compare . + figure [ mean - order ] shows the mean order of mafs for the instances of protein trees . the number of instances we tested in each instance set t@xmath283 is not less than @xmath293 , where @xmath294 and @xmath285 . as can be seen from the figure [ mean - order ] , we can get that the mean order of mafs for the instances are increase as the number of trees in the instances increase , which indicates that the reticulation has influenced the evolutionary history of these parts of the genomes that being compared . therefore , it makes perfect sense to study the maf problem on multiple trees . we also run pmaf and amaf on the poaceae data set from the grass phylogeny working group @xcite . the dataset contains sequences for six loci : internal transcribed spacer of ribosomal dna ( its ) ; nadh dehydrogenase , subunit f ( ndhf ) ; phytochrome b ( phyb ) ; ribulose 1,5-biphosphate carboxylase / oxygenase , large subunit ( rbcl ) ; rna polymerase ii , subunit @xmath295 ( rpoc2 ) ; and granule bound starch synthase i ( waxy ) . when comparing these trees , only shared taxa of the set of trees are kept . .comparing the trees of poaceae data set . [ cols="^,^,^,^",options="header " , ] tabel [ poaceae ] shows our experimental results on the poaceae data set . as can be seen from the table , the ratios outputted by amaf are small , because the size of instances are very small and the order of an maf for these instances are large , relative to their sizes . + the protein tree data set and poaceae data set above , are all binary tree . in order to test our programs on biological data sets of general phylogenetic trees , we introduce the multifurcations in the @xmath290 protein trees which has been discussed above by collapsing each bipartition with a bootstrap support value of less than 0.8 . the way for introduction of multifurcations is the same as the way in @xcite . figure [ mean - nonbinary - order ] shows the mean order of mafs for the instances of general protein trees . the number of instances we tested in each instance set t@xmath283 is not less than @xmath293 , where @xmath294 and @xmath285 . in this paper , we presented the first group of parameterized algorithms for the maximum agreement forest problem on multiple general phylogenetic trees : one for rooted trees that runs in time @xmath0 ; and the other for unrooted trees that runs in time @xmath2 . we also presented the first group of approximation algorithms for the maximum agreement forest problem on multiple general phylogenetic trees : one for rooted trees with ratio @xmath1 , and the other for unrooted trees with ratio @xmath3 . extensive experiments on simulated data and biological data show that our programs pmaf and amaf are able to calculate the orders of mafs for the constructed instances . in particular , when the order of maf is small , pmaf can return the order of maf for the instance quickly . further improvements on the algorithm complexity of parameterized algorithms and the ratio of polynomial - time approximation algorithms for the maximum agreement forest problem on multiple general phylogenetic trees are certainly desired . however , the improvement seems require new observations in the graph structures of the phylogenetic trees . f. hodson , d. kendall , and p. tauta , _ the recovery of trees from measures of dissimilarity . in mathematics in the archaeological and historical sciences _ , edinburgh , u.k . : edinburgh university press , pp . 387 - 395 , 1971 . m. baroni , s. grnewald , v. moulton , and c. semple , `` bounding the number of hybridisation events for a consistent evolutionary history , '' _ journal of mathematical biology _ , vol . 171 - 182 , 2005 . j. fehrer , b. gemeinholzer , j. chrtek jr , et al , `` incongruent plastid and nuclear dna phylogenies reveal ancient intergeneric hybridization in pilosella hawkweeds ( hieracium , cichorieae , asteraceae ) , '' _ molecular phylogenetics and evolution _ 347 - 361 , 2007 . o. paun , c. lehnebach , j. t. johansson , et al , `` phylogenetic relationships and biogeography of ranunculus and allied genera ( ranunculaceae ) in the mediterranean region and in the european alpine system , '' _ taxon _ , vol . 4 , pp . 911 - 932 , 2005 . coyne , s. elwyn , s.y . kim , and a. llopart , `` genetic studies of two sister species in the drosophila melanogaster subgroup , d. yakuba and d. santomea , '' _ genetical research _ , vol . 11 - 26 , 2004 . kliman , p. andolfatto , j.a . coyne , f. depaulis , m. kreitman , a.j . berry , j. mccarter , j. wakeley , and j. hey , `` the population genetics of the origin and divergence of the drosophila simulans complex species , '' _ genetics _ , vol . 1913 - 1931 , 2000 . k. takahashi , y. terai , m. nishida , and n. okada , `` phylogenetic relationships and ancient incomplete lineage sorting among cichlid fishes in lake tanganyika as revealed by analysis of the insertion of retroposons , '' _ molecular biology and evolution _ 18 , pp . 2057 - 2066 , 2001 . rodrigues , m.f . sagot , and y. wakabayashi , `` some approximation results for the maximum agreement forest problem , '' proc . approximation , randomization , and combinatorial optimization : algorithms and techniques ( approx 2001 and random 2001 ) , pp . 159 - 169 , aug . 2007 . e. rodrigues , m. sagot , and y. wakabayashi , `` the maximum agreement forest problem : approximation algorithms and computational experiments , '' _ theoretical computer science _ , vol . 374 , no . 1 - 3 , pp . 91 - 110 , 2007 . j. chen , j.h . fan , and s.h . sze , `` parameterized and approximation algorithms for the maf problem in multifurcating trees , '' proc . graph - theoretic concepts in computer science ( wg 2013 ) , pp . 152 - 164 , jan . 2013 . o. paun , c. lehnebach , j.t . johansson , et al , `` phylogenetic relationships and biogeography of ranunculus and allied genera ( ranunculaceae ) in the mediterranean region and in the european alpine system , '' _ taxon _ , vol . 911 - 932 , 2005 . Abstract:

Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.

Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered . Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video . Paper: the _ gromov product _ with reference point @xmath0 of a metric space @xmath1 is defined by @xmath2 we call a sequence @xmath3 in @xmath4 _ convergent at infinity _ if @xmath5 as @xmath6 ( cf . 8 in @xcite ) . the central aim of this paper is to develop a theory for understanding the large scale geometry on metric spaces and the action of mappings or transformations on metric spaces using convergent sequences at infinity , with reference to the theory of gromov hyperbolic spaces . in fact , we will focus on mappings between metric spaces which send sequences keeping the condition of the convergence at infinity . we will call such mappings _ asymptotically conservative with the gromov product _ ( or _ asymptotically conservative _ , for short ) . see [ subsec : asymptotically_conservative ] for details . _ gromov hyperbolic spaces _ were introduced and developed by m. gromov in his very important paper @xcite . gromov hyperbolic spaces form a large and much studied class of metric spaces , which satisfy certain characteristic properties of hyperbolic geometry . indeed , they include all complete simply connected riemannian manifolds whose sectional curvature is everywhere less than a negative constant . convergent sequences at infinity appear naturally in studying the large scale geometry of gromov hyperbolic spaces . indeed , every gromov hyperbolic space @xmath4 admits a natural ideal boundary @xmath7 , called the _ gromov boundary _ of @xmath4 , and any convergent sequence at infinity in @xmath4 determines a boundary point . the gromov product admits a canonical extension to the gromov boundary , and the extension defines a distance on the gromov boundary ( 1.8b in @xcite . see also 2 in @xcite ) . in a gromov hyperbolic space , if two sequences @xmath8 and @xmath9 are convergent together at infinity in the sense that @xmath10 as @xmath6 , they determine the same ideal boundary point . from other viewpoints , this means that we are unable to distinguish between their asymptotic behaviors in a gromov hyperbolic space . we will call two sequences in an ( arbitrary ) metric space satisfying _ visually indistinguishable_. one simple but remarkable fact is that in a gromov hyperbolic space , the relation visually indistinguishable " defines an equivalence relation on the set of convergent sequences at infinity . indeed , this fact allows us to define the ideal boundary ( gromov boundary ) for every gromov hyperbolic space . however , on an arbitrary metric space , the relation is not an equivalent relation . the _ teichmller distance _ is a natural distance on the teichmller space . in @xcite , s. kerckhoff discovered an elegant geometric interpretation of the teichmller distance via extremal length . indeed , kerckhoff s formula asserts that the teichmller distance is represented by the ratio of extremal lengths of simple closed curves on marked riemann surfaces . following his observation , we often call the geometry on the teichmller distance the _ extremal length geometry on teichmller space_. in @xcite , h. masur and m. wolf observed that teichmller space is not gromov hyperbolic when the base surface is neither a torus with one hole nor a sphere with four holes . in fact , the relation visually indistinguishable " discussed in the previous section does not define an equivalent relation on the set of convergent sequences at infinity in teichmller space . in addition , masur @xcite showed that teichmller space is not negatively curved in the sense of busemann , and y. minsky @xcite observed an interesting phenomenon which implies that teichmller space behaves like a positively curved space in the thin part . thus , it seems to be hard to reap benefit directly from the general theory of negatively curved spaces . on the other hand , the gromov product on teichmller space connects between the analytic aspect and the topological aspect at infinity of teichmller space described as follows ( see also [ subsec : cones_intersectionnumber ] ) . consider two quasiconformal mappings @xmath11 and @xmath12 . it is known that @xmath13 where @xmath14 is the maximal dilatation of @xmath15 . the equality @xmath16 does not hold in general . for instance @xmath17 for a quasiconformal mapping with @xmath18 . in the theory of quasiconformal mappings , the following question is fundamental ( but obscure ) : _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ how can we measure the _ insufficiency _ @xmath19 of the composition from @xmath15 and @xmath20 ? _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ for a quasiconformal mapping @xmath21 between riemann surfaces , we denote by @xmath22 the infimum of the maximal dilatations of quasiconformal mappings from @xmath23 to @xmath24 homotopic to @xmath15 . the teichmller distance between marked riemann surfaces @xmath25 and @xmath26 is originally defined as @xmath27 ( cf . [ subsec : teichmuller - space ] ) . hence , the gromov product of @xmath28 and @xmath29 with base point @xmath30 satisfies @xmath31 thus the gromov product measures the insufficiency " of the maximal dilatation arising from the difference of markings . in @xcite , zhong li and yi qi give another treatment of the insufficiency or the gromov product in the analytic aspect . the gromov product of the teichmller distance links between the extremal length geometry and the thurston theory on the geometry of simple closed curves with the intersection number . for two points @xmath28 and @xmath29 in teichmller space , the quantity @xmath32 is recognized as the ( weighted ) _ intersection number _ between @xmath28 and @xmath29 with the base point @xmath0 ( cf . [ subsec : intersection_number_with_base_point ] ) . namely , the pairing extends continuously to a canonical boundary in the extremal length geometry on teichmller space , which is called the _ gardiner - masur boundary _ , and the extension coincides with the weighted intersection number function on the boundary where includes the space of projective measured foliations . in addition , this observation implies that teichmller space has a boundary continuous " property in terms of the gromov product ( cf [ subsec : boundary_continuous ] ) . as we discussed above , the gromov product of the teichmller distance gives a strong connection between * analytic aspect : theory on quasiconformal mappings ( insufficiency of the maximal dilation of the composition ) , and * topological aspect : thurston theory ( geometry on simple closed curves with the intersection number ) . indeed , the above insufficiency coincides with the weight intersection number at infinity of teichmller space . from the seemingly useful property of the gromov product on teichmller space , one may ask : _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ what can we know about the large scale geometry of teichmller space using the gromov product ? _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ however , because of masur - wolf s result discussed above , the properties of the gromov product in terms of the large scale geometry of teichmller space are less known . thus , from the general point of view , we need to develop a theory on arbitrary metric spaces by specializing the asymptotic behavior on convergent sequences at infinity . let @xmath4 and @xmath33 be metric spaces . a mapping @xmath34 is said to be _ asymptotically conservative with the gromov product _ ( _ asymptotically conservative _ for short ) if @xmath35 maps every pair of visually indistinguishable sequences in @xmath4 to a pair of such sequences , vice versa ( cf . definition [ def : asymptotically_conservative ] ) . asymptotically conservative mappings are defined in an effort to produce a qualitative version of quasi - isometries with respect to the asymptotic behavior of visually indistinguishable sequences under quasi - isometries between gromov hyperbolic spaces . indeed , any quasi - isometry between gromov hyperbolic spaces is asymptotically conservative ( cf . theorem 7.2h in @xcite ) . we will see in [ sec : asymptotic_conservative ] that the composition of two asymptotically conservative mappings is also asymptotically conservative , and asymptotically conservative mappings are stable under paralleism , like as quasi - isometries between metric spaces . in particular , any mapping parallel to an isometry is asymptotically conservative ( see [ subsec : remarks_asymptotically_conservative ] ) . let @xmath36 be a convergent sequence at infinity . we denote by @xmath37 the set of convergent sequences at infinity which are visually indistinguishable from @xmath36 . though the relation visually indistinguishable " is not an equivalent relation on the set of convergent sequences on any metric space , if two convergent sequences @xmath38 and @xmath39 at infinity satisfy @xmath40 , we ( pretend to ) recognize that two sequences @xmath38 and @xmath39 determine the same ideal point at infinity . two asymptotically conservative mappings @xmath41 and @xmath42 are said to be _ close at infinity _ , if for any sequences @xmath43 and @xmath44 , @xmath45 implies @xmath46 . namely , if @xmath41 and @xmath42 are close at infinity , we can not find any difference between @xmath41 and @xmath42 in the large scale geometry in terms of the asymptotic behavior of convergent sequences at infinity . a mapping @xmath34 is said to be _ invertible _ if there is a mapping @xmath47 such that @xmath48 and @xmath49 are close to the identity mappings on @xmath4 and @xmath33 , respectively . we call such @xmath50 an _ asymptotic quasi - inverse _ of @xmath35 . a quasi - inverse in the coarse geometry is a typical example of asymptotic quasi - inverses ( cf . remark ( 5 ) of [ subsec : remarks_asymptotically_conservative ] ) . let @xmath51 be the set of invertible asymptotically conservative mappings on @xmath4 to itself . we first observe the following theorem ( cf . theorems [ thm : properties_quasimorphisms_identity ] and [ thm : quotient_semigroup ] ) . [ thm : arbitrary_quotient_space ] let @xmath4 be a metric space . the set @xmath51 admits a canonical monoid structure with respect to the composition of mappings . furthermore , the relation closeness at infinity " is a semigroup congruence on @xmath51 and the quotient semigroup @xmath52 is a group . as discussed in the previous section , our mappings are defined after on the model of quasi - isometries between gromov hyperbolic spaces . hence , we may presume that the group @xmath52 has a good property in a sense when @xmath4 is a gromov hyperbolic space . in fact , we shall see the following ( for details , see [ subsec : conclusion_characterization ] ) . [ thm : gromov_hyperbolic ] let @xmath4 be a gromov hyperbolic space . then , the group @xmath52 is canonically identified with the group of bijective mappings on @xmath7 such that they and their inverses are extensions of mappings of @xmath4 . in addition , if @xmath4 is boundary continuous , above bijective mappings of @xmath7 become homeomorphisms . [ [ large - scale - geometry - of - teichmller - space ] ] * large scale geometry of teichmller space * + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + as mentioned in [ subsec : background_motivation ] , our main interest is to clarify the large scale geometry of teichmller space with the asymptotic behaviors of convergent sequences at infinity . the extened mapping class group @xmath53 of @xmath54 acts isometrically on @xmath55 and we have a group homomorphism @xmath56 since any isometry is an invertible asymptotically conservative mapping , the inclusion @xmath57 is a monoid homomorphism . for details , see [ subsec : action_of_extended_mapping_class_groups ] . in the case of teichmller space , we will prove the following rigidity theorem ( cf . theorem [ thm : induced_automorphism ] ) . [ thm : teichmullerspace ] let @xmath54 be a compact orientable surface of negative euler characteristic such that @xmath54 is neither a torus with one hole nor a sphere with four holes . let @xmath55 be the teichmller space of @xmath54 , endowed with the teichmller distance . let @xmath58 be the complex of curves on @xmath54 . then , there is a monoid epimorphism @xmath59 which descends to an isomorphism @xmath60 satisfying the following commutative diagram @xmath61^{\mathcal{i}_0 } & { \rm isom}({\mathcal{t } } ) \ar[r]^{\mathcal{i } } \ar[dr]^{\mbox{{\tiny group iso } } } & { { \rm ac_{inv}}}({\mathcal{t } } ) \ar[d]^{\mbox{{\tiny proj } } } \ar[dr]^{\xi } & \\ & & { \mathfrak{ac}}({\mathcal{t } } ) \ar[r]^{\mbox{{\tiny group iso } } } & { \rm aut}(\mathbb{x}(s ) ) , & } \ ] ] where @xmath62 is the group of simplicial automorphisms of @xmath58 . theorem [ thm : teichmullerspace ] implies that any invertible asymptotically conservative mapping on @xmath55 is close to an isometry on @xmath55 at infinity . thus , invertible asymptotically conservative mappings are considered as _ coarsifications _ " of isometries which are rigid at infinity in the teichmller theory . when @xmath54 is either a torus with one hole or a sphere with four holes , the teichmller space of @xmath54 is isomorphic to the poincar disk and the characterization for this case follows from theorem [ thm : gromov_hyperbolic ] . by applying the discussion in the proof of theorem [ thm : teichmullerspace ] , we also obtain a hyperbolic characteristic of teichmller space . in fact , we will give a proof of the following folklore result in [ subsec : rough_homothety ] . [ thm : teichmullerspace_homothety ] let @xmath54 be a compact orientable surface of negative euler characteristic . then , there is no @xmath63-rough homothety with asymptotic quasi - inverse on the teichmller space of @xmath54 unless @xmath64 . here , a mapping @xmath65 between metric spaces is said to be a @xmath63-_rough homothety _ if @xmath66 for @xmath67 ( cf . chapter 7 of @xcite ) . one can easily see that any rough - homothety is asymptotically conservative . by definition , any isometry is a @xmath68-rough homothety for all @xmath69 . hence , teichmller space admits @xmath68-rough homotheties for all @xmath69 . theorem [ thm : teichmullerspace_homothety ] implies that there is no non - trivial similarity in teichmller space , like in hyperbolic spaces . though enormous hyperbolic characteristics have been observed in teichmller space , we would like to notice a remarkable fact proven by athreya , bufetov , eskin and mirzakhani in @xcite . indeed , they observed that the volume of the metric balls in teichmller space has exponential growth . thus , their result might imply that a measurable @xmath63-homothety on teichmller space does not exist unless @xmath70 . this paper is organized as follows : in [ sec : asymptotic_conservative ] , we will introduce asymptotically conservative mappings on metric spaces . we first start with the basics for the gromov product , and we next develop the properties of asymptotically conservative mappings . we will prove theorem [ thm : arbitrary_quotient_space ] in [ subsec : monoild_semingroups ] . in [ subsec : remarks_asymptotically_conservative ] , we will give typical examples of asymptotically conservative mappings . in [ sec : gromov_hyperbolic_space ] , we give characterizations of asymptotically conservative mappings on gromov hyperbolic spaces and will prove theorem [ thm : gromov_hyperbolic ] in [ subsec : conclusion_characterization ] . from [ sec : teichmuller_theory ] to [ sec : action_reduced_boundary ] , we devote to prepare for the proofs of theorems [ thm : teichmullerspace ] and [ thm : teichmullerspace_homothety ] . in [ sec : teichmuller_theory ] , we give basic notions of teichmller theory including the definitions of teichmller space , measured foliations and extremal length . in [ sec : thurston_theory_extremal_length ] , we recall our unification theorem for extremal length geometry on teichmller space via intersection number . this unification connects between the geometry on the gromov product on teichmller space and that of the intersection number on the space of measured foliations . we will define cones , the stage where we develop the thurston theory with extremal length , from the garidner - masur compactification . indeed , we can define the intersection number function on the cones . we also give basic properties of the cones and the intersection number . in [ sec : null_sets_section ] , we shall define the null sets for points in the cone , and show that any point of the cone has the same null set with a measured foliations . we will also give a characterization of such measured foliations for points in the cone . in [ sec : action_reduced_boundary ] , we define the reduced gardner - masur compactification and study the action of asymptotically conservative mappings on the reduced gardiner - masur compactification . in [ sec : rigidity_asymptotic_teichmuller ] , we will prove theorems [ thm : teichmullerspace ] and [ thm : teichmullerspace_homothety ] . in the proof of theorem [ thm : teichmullerspace_homothety ] , we mainly treat the case where the teichmller space of @xmath54 has dimension at least @xmath71 , but the proof is modeled on the proof for the case of one dimensional teichmller space . we will also sketch the proof of the one dimensional case . in the last section ( [ sec : appendix ] ) , as an appendix , we shall give an estimation of extremal length . indeed , our result is a refinement of the estimation given by gardiner and masur in @xcite . the author would like to express his hearty gratitude to professor kenichi ohshika for fruitful discussions and his constant encouragements . he also thanks professor yair minsky for informing him about a work by athreya , bufetov , eskin and mirzakhani in @xcite . the author also thanks professor athanase papadopoulos for his kindness and useful comments . in this section , we introduce asymptotically conservative mappings with the gromov product between metric spaces . for completeness , we redefine them . let @xmath1 be a metric space . in what follows , we assume that all metric space is of infinite diameter . as given in the introduction , the _ gromov product _ on @xmath4 is , by definition , @xmath72 for @xmath73 . we call the point @xmath74 in the _ reference point _ of the gromov product ( cf . 1 in @xcite ) . when the metric space in the discussion is clear in the context , we omit to specify the metric space in denoting the gromov product . the following is known for @xmath28 , @xmath29 , @xmath75 , @xmath76 , @xmath77 : @xmath78 a sequence @xmath3 in @xmath4 is said to be _ convergent at infinity _ if the sequence satisfies @xmath79 ( @xmath6 ) for some ( and hence any ) point @xmath80 . in this section , unless otherwise specified , we always assume that every sequence converges at infinity . [ def : visually_indistinguishable ] a sequence @xmath81 in @xmath4 is said to be * visually indistinguishable * , if @xmath4 is gromov hyperbolic , the relation visually indistinguishable " is an equivalent relation on the set of convergent sequences at infinity ( cf . 2.2 in @xcite ) . however , the relation visually indistinguishable " is not an equivalent relation in general . hence , we do not use here the word equivalence " which is commonly used in the study of hyperbolic spaces . ] * at infinity ( visually indistinguishable , for short ) * from a sequence @xmath82 in @xmath4 if @xmath83 from , the above definition is independent of the choice of the reference points @xmath0 of the gromov product on @xmath4 . therefore , in what follows , we may fix reference points of metric spaces for the gromov product , for instance , @xmath80 and @xmath84 etc . for a sequence @xmath85 in @xmath4 , we define @xmath86 for a map @xmath34 and a sequence @xmath85 , we write @xmath87 as usual . [ def : asymptotic ] two sequences @xmath43 and @xmath44 in @xmath4 are said to be * asymptotic * if @xmath45 . [ remark : accompanying_sequence ] the following hold : 1 . the relation visually indistinguishable " is reflexive on the set of convergent sequences at infinity . indeed , @xmath36 converges at infinity if and only if @xmath36 is visually indistinguishable from @xmath36 itself . the relation visually indistinguishable " is symmetric : if @xmath88 , then @xmath89 . the relation visually indistinguishable " is not transitive in general . namely , it is possible that @xmath90 for some sequences @xmath91 with @xmath92 . 4 . for any @xmath88 , any subsequence of @xmath93 is also in @xmath37 . 5 . let @xmath36 and @xmath93 be convergent sequences at infinity . if any subsequence of @xmath93 contains a subsequence which is visually indistinguishable from @xmath36 , then @xmath93 itself is contained in @xmath37 . indeed , we can see that on teichmller space , the relation visually indistinguishable " is not an equivalent relation when the base surface is neither a torus with one hole nor a sphere with four holes ( cf . [ sec : remark_visually_indistinguishable ] ) . we shall give a brief check of the assertion ( 5 ) above . suppose that @xmath94 . then , @xmath95 for some @xmath96 where @xmath85 and @xmath97 . then , we can take @xmath98 and @xmath99 such that @xmath100 for @xmath101 . hence , any subsequence of a subsequence @xmath102 of @xmath93 is not visually indistinguishable from @xmath36 . let @xmath1 and @xmath103 be metric spaces . [ def : asymptotically_conservative ] a mapping @xmath34 is said to be * asymptotically conservative with the gromov product ( asymptotically conservative , for short ) * if for any two sequences @xmath43 and @xmath44 in @xmath4 , @xmath43 is visually indistinguishable from @xmath44 in @xmath4 if and only if @xmath104 is also visually indistinguishable from @xmath105 in @xmath33 . namely , for any sequence @xmath36 in @xmath4 , the following two conditions hold ; 1 . @xmath106 ; 2 . for any sequence @xmath93 in @xmath4 , if @xmath107 , then @xmath88 . let @xmath108 be the set of asymptotically conservative mappings from @xmath4 to @xmath33 . set @xmath109 for simplicity . one can easily see that any isometry is asymptotically conservative ( see also [ subsec : remarks_asymptotically_conservative ] ) . [ remark:1 ] suppose @xmath34 is asymptotically conservative . if a sequence @xmath36 in @xmath4 converges at infinity , then @xmath36 is visually indistinguishable from @xmath36 itself . hence , @xmath110 is visually indistinguishable from @xmath110 itself , which means that @xmath110 also converges at infinity in @xmath33 . the converse is also true . namely , if @xmath110 converges at infinity , so does @xmath36 . [ prop : properties_quasimorphisms ] let @xmath4 , @xmath33 and @xmath111 be metric spaces . for @xmath112 and @xmath113 , @xmath114 . let @xmath36 be a sequence in @xmath4 . then , @xmath115 let @xmath93 be a sequence in @xmath4 with @xmath116 . since @xmath41 is asymptotically conservative , @xmath117 . since @xmath42 is also asymptotically conservative again , we have @xmath88 . a mapping @xmath34 is said to be _ asymptotically - surjective _ if for any @xmath118 in @xmath33 convergent sequence at infinity , there is a sequence @xmath36 in @xmath4 with @xmath119 . let @xmath120 be the set of asymptotically conservative and asymptotically surjective mappings from @xmath4 to @xmath33 . [ def : closeness_at_infinity ] two mappings @xmath41 and @xmath42 from @xmath4 to @xmath33 are said to be * close at infinity * if and only if for any sequences @xmath43 and @xmath44 in @xmath4 , if @xmath43 and @xmath44 are asymptotic , so are @xmath121 and @xmath122 . namely , if @xmath45 , then @xmath46 . in particular , if two mappings @xmath41 and @xmath42 from @xmath4 to @xmath33 are close at infinity , @xmath123 for all @xmath36 in @xmath4 convergent sequence at infinity . [ prop : properties_quasimorphisms_close ] let @xmath4 , @xmath33 and @xmath111 be metric spaces . let @xmath41 , @xmath124 and @xmath42 , @xmath125 be mappings . suppose @xmath126 and @xmath127 are close at infinity for @xmath128 . then , @xmath129 is close to @xmath130 at infinity . let @xmath43 and @xmath44 be sequences in @xmath4 with @xmath45 . by definition , @xmath131 , and hence @xmath132 . [ prop : quasi - surjective_asymptotic ] let @xmath133 . let @xmath43 and @xmath44 be convergent sequences in @xmath4 at infinity . if @xmath134 , then @xmath135 . let @xmath136 . since @xmath35 is asymptotically surjective , there is a sequence @xmath93 in @xmath4 such that @xmath137 . since @xmath35 is asymptotically conservative and @xmath138 , we have @xmath139 and @xmath140 therefore , @xmath141 ( cf . ( 2 ) of remark [ remark : accompanying_sequence ] ) . hence we deduce @xmath142 and @xmath143 . [ prop : gp_close_equivalence_relation ] let @xmath4 and @xmath33 be metric spaces . the relation closeness at infinity " is an equivalent relation on @xmath120 . let @xmath43 and @xmath44 be sequences in @xmath4 . suppose that @xmath43 and @xmath44 are asymptotic , which means that @xmath45 . ( reflexive law)this follows from proposition [ prop : quasi - surjective_asymptotic ] . ( symmetric law)take two mappings @xmath144 . since @xmath41 is close to @xmath42 at infinity , @xmath46 . by interchanging the roles of @xmath43 and @xmath44 , @xmath145 . this means that @xmath42 is close to @xmath41 at infinity . ( transitive law)take three mappings @xmath146 . suppose that @xmath126 is close to @xmath147 at infinity ( @xmath128 ) . then , from , @xmath148 and hence , @xmath41 is close to @xmath149 at infinity . a mapping @xmath150 is said to be _ invertible _ if there is @xmath151 such that @xmath48 and @xmath152 are close to the identity mappings on @xmath4 and @xmath33 respectively . we call such @xmath50 an _ asymptotic quasi - inverse _ of @xmath35 . let @xmath153 be the set of invertible asymptotically conservative mappings . set @xmath154 . notice that for @xmath155 , any asymptotic quasi - inverse @xmath50 of @xmath35 is in @xmath156 , and @xmath35 is an asymptotic quasi - inverse of @xmath50 . [ prop : invertible_means_surjectivity ] let @xmath4 and @xmath33 be metric spaces . then , @xmath157 . let @xmath155 . let @xmath50 be an asymptotic quasi - inverse of @xmath35 . let @xmath118 be a sequence in @xmath33 . set @xmath158 . since @xmath152 is close to the identity mapping on @xmath33 at infinity , @xmath159 which implies @xmath133 . [ prop : composition ] for @xmath160 and @xmath161 , we have @xmath162 . let @xmath127 be an asymptotic quasi - inverse of @xmath126 for @xmath128 . let @xmath163 and @xmath164 be sequences in @xmath111 . suppose that @xmath165 . let @xmath166 for @xmath128 . since @xmath167 is close to the identity mapping on @xmath33 , @xmath168 since @xmath169 is asymptotically surjective , @xmath170 from proposition [ prop : quasi - surjective_asymptotic ] . therefore , @xmath171 and @xmath172 are asymptotic . since @xmath41 is asymptotically surjective again , we have @xmath173 since @xmath174 is asymptotically close to the identity mapping on @xmath111 at infinity . therefore , @xmath175 which means that @xmath176 is close to the the identity mapping on @xmath111 at infinity . by the same argument , we can see that @xmath177 is close to the identity mapping on @xmath4 . therefore , @xmath178 is an asymptotic quasi - inverse of @xmath129 and @xmath162 . [ prop : relation_closeness_at_infinity ] let @xmath144 . suppose that @xmath41 and @xmath42 are close at infinity . if @xmath179 , so is @xmath42 . in particular , in this case , any asymptotic quasi - inverse of @xmath41 is one of @xmath42 . let @xmath169 be an asymptotic quasi - inverse of @xmath41 . let @xmath43 and @xmath44 be sequences in @xmath4 . suppose that @xmath43 and @xmath44 are asymptotic . since @xmath41 and @xmath42 are close at infinity , @xmath180 since @xmath42 is asymptotically surjective , by proposition [ prop : quasi - surjective_asymptotic ] , we have @xmath181 let @xmath182 and @xmath183 be sequences in @xmath33 . suppose that @xmath182 and @xmath183 are asymptotic . since @xmath169 is asymptotically surjective again , @xmath184 since @xmath41 and @xmath42 are close at infinity , we deduce @xmath185 from and , we conclude that @xmath169 is an asymptotic quasi - inverse of @xmath42 , and @xmath161 . the following theorem follows from propositions [ prop : properties_quasimorphisms ] and [ prop : composition ] . [ thm : properties_quasimorphisms_identity ] @xmath186 admits a canonical monoid structure with respect to the composition of mappings . the identity element of @xmath186 is the identity mapping on @xmath4 . in addition , @xmath51 is a submonoid of @xmath186 . let @xmath187 be a semigroup . semigroup congruence _ is an equivalent relation @xmath188 on @xmath187 with the property that for @xmath189 , @xmath190 and @xmath191 imply @xmath192 . then , the congruence classes @xmath193\mid g\in g\}\ ] ] is also a semigroup with the product @xmath194[g_2]=[g_1g_2]$ ] . we call @xmath195 the _ quotient semigroup _ of @xmath187 with the semigroup congruence @xmath188 . we define a relation on @xmath51 by using closeness at infinity . namely , for two @xmath41 and @xmath196 , @xmath41 is equivalent to @xmath42 if @xmath41 is close to @xmath42 at infinity . from propositions [ prop : gp_close_equivalence_relation ] and [ prop : invertible_means_surjectivity ] , this relation is an equivalent relation on @xmath51 . from proposition [ prop : properties_quasimorphisms_close ] , this relation is a subgroup congruence on @xmath51 . we denote the quotient semigroup by @xmath52 . from the definition of asymptotic quasi - inverses and proposition [ prop : relation_closeness_at_infinity ] , we have the following . [ thm : quotient_semigroup ] let @xmath4 be a metric space . then , the quotient semigroup @xmath52 is a group . the identity element of @xmath52 is the congruence class of the identity mapping , and the inverse of the congruence class @xmath197 $ ] of @xmath198 is the congruence class of an asymptotic quasi - inverse of @xmath35 . let @xmath4 and @xmath33 be metric spaces . consider @xmath150 and @xmath151 . if @xmath50 is an asymptotic quasi - inverse of @xmath35 , the mapping @xmath199 induces an isomorphism @xmath200\mapsto [ \omega\circ f\circ \omega ' ] \in { \mathfrak{ac}}(y).\ ] ] ( 1)an asymptotically conservative mapping need not be a quasi - isometry . indeed , let @xmath201 with @xmath202 . let @xmath203 be the reference point . then , any increasing function @xmath204 with @xmath205 is asymptotically conservative . furthermore , as we will see in theorem [ thm : gromov_hyperbolic_ac ] in [ subsec : asymptotically_conservative_hyperbolic ] , when @xmath4 and @xmath33 are gromov hyperbolic , if a mapping @xmath34 is extendable to their gromov boundaries and the extension is injective , @xmath35 is asymptotically conservative . hence , one can easily find an asymptotically conservative mapping which is not a quasi - isometry . ( 2)meanwhile , little is known as to when quasi - isometries become asymptotically conservative . for instance , any rough homothety is asymptotically conservative ( cf . ) . actually , it follows from the following fact that any rough homothety @xmath35 satisfies @xmath206 for some @xmath207 . ( 3)asymptotically conservative mappings are stable with respect to _ paralleism _ , where two mappings @xmath208 between metric spaces are said to be _ parallel _ if and only if @xmath209 ( cf . 1.a in @xcite ) . if a mapping @xmath34 is parallel to an asymptotically conservative mapping @xmath210 , then @xmath35 is also asymptotically conservative . indeed , let @xmath211 . let @xmath212 ( @xmath128 ) be sequences in @xmath4 with @xmath213 . since @xmath214 as @xmath6 , we have @xmath215 and hence @xmath216 ( cf . ) . suppose that @xmath85 and @xmath217 are sequences with @xmath107 . then , @xmath218 and @xmath219 . since @xmath220 is asymptotically conservative , @xmath88 . ( 4)a typical example of asymptotically surjective mappings is a quasi - surjective mapping . here , a mapping @xmath34 from between metric spaces is said to be _ quasi - surjective _ if there is a constant @xmath221 such that for any @xmath222 , there is an @xmath223 with @xmath224 . indeed , let @xmath225 be a convergent sequence in @xmath33 at infinity . take @xmath226 such that @xmath227 . then , for @xmath228 , @xmath229 as @xmath6 and @xmath230 ( cf . ) . therefore , we obtain @xmath231 . by applying the same argument , we get @xmath232 . thus , @xmath35 is asymptotically surjective . ( 5)similarly , a typical example of asymptotic quasi - inverses is a quasi - inverse . here , for a mapping @xmath34 , a mapping @xmath47 is said to be a _ quasi - inverse _ ( in the coarse geometry ) if there is a constant @xmath233 such that @xmath234 indeed , let @xmath43 and @xmath44 be sequences with @xmath45 . let @xmath235 ( @xmath236 ) . then , @xmath237 as @xmath6 , where @xmath238 ( cf . ) . hence , @xmath239 . by applying the same argument , we deduce that @xmath240 . thus , @xmath48 is close to the identity mapping on @xmath4 . similarly , we can see that @xmath152 is close to the identity mapping on @xmath33 . hence , @xmath50 is an asymptotic quasi - inverse of @xmath35 . gromov hyperbolic spaces are an important class of metric spaces , and they are applied in various fields in mathematics . in this section , we shall study the asymptotic geometry of asymptotically conservative mappings on gromov hyperbolic spaces , and give a characterization of the mappings in terms of boundary values . let @xmath241 be a metric space . fix a reference point @xmath80 . we say that @xmath4 is _ gromov @xmath242-hyperbolic _ if @xmath243 for any @xmath244 . if a metric space is gromov @xmath242-hyperbolic for some @xmath245 , we call the metric space _ gromov hyperbolic_. two convergent sequences at infinity are said to be _ equivalent _ if they are visually indistinguishable from each other ( cf . chapter 4 of @xcite and 3.4 of @xcite ) . from , when @xmath4 is gromov hyperbolic , the relation visually indistinguishable " is an equivalent relation on the set of convergent sequences at infinity ( cf . 2.2 in @xcite ) . in other words , for any convergent sequences @xmath43 and @xmath44 at infinity , if @xmath246 , then @xmath45 . namely , for convergent sequences @xmath43 and @xmath44 at infinity , the following are equivalent : 1 . @xmath43 and @xmath44 are equivalent ; 2 . @xmath45 ; 3 . @xmath246 . the set @xmath7 of equivalence classes of convergent sequences at infinity is called the _ gromov boundary _ of @xmath4 . let @xmath4 and @xmath33 be gromov hyperbolic metric spaces . a mapping @xmath34 is said to be _ extendable _ if there is a mapping @xmath247 such that for any @xmath248 and any sequence @xmath36 in @xmath4 representing @xmath249 , @xmath110 converges at infinity and represents @xmath250 . we call @xmath251 the _ extension _ of @xmath35 . [ thm : gromov_hyperbolic_ac ] let @xmath4 and @xmath33 be gromov hyperbolic spaces . let @xmath34 be a mapping . then , @xmath35 is in @xmath108 if and only if @xmath35 is extendable and the extension is injective . suppose @xmath150 . let @xmath248 . let @xmath85 be a representative of @xmath249 . from remark [ remark:1 ] , @xmath110 also converges at infinity . we define @xmath247 by assigning the equivalence class @xmath249 of @xmath36 to the equivalence class @xmath250 of @xmath110 . since @xmath35 is asymptotically conservative , the equivalence class @xmath250 is determined independently of the choice of sequences @xmath36 . hence , the extension @xmath251 is well - defined . let @xmath252 with @xmath253 . for @xmath128 , let @xmath254 be a representative of @xmath255 . since @xmath256 , we have @xmath257 because @xmath35 is asymptotically conservative again . since @xmath4 is gromov hyperbolic , @xmath258 and @xmath259 . this implies that the extension @xmath251 is injective . suppose that @xmath35 admits an injective extension @xmath251 to @xmath7 . let @xmath248 and @xmath36 be a representative of @xmath249 . since @xmath35 is extendable , @xmath110 converges at infinity and represents @xmath250 . let @xmath88 . from the definition of the gromov boundary , @xmath93 also represents @xmath249 . therefore , by the definition of extensions , we have @xmath260 , and @xmath261 since @xmath262 and @xmath110 represent the same boundary point in @xmath263 . therefore , @xmath264 let @xmath93 be a convergent sequence at infinity . let @xmath265 be the equivalence class of @xmath93 . suppose @xmath107 . this means that @xmath266 and @xmath267 . since @xmath251 is injective , we have @xmath268 and @xmath269 hence , @xmath35 is asymptotically conservative . [ prop : gromov_hyperbolic_asymptotic_surjective ] let @xmath34 be a mapping . then , @xmath133 if and only if @xmath35 is extendable and the extension is bijective . suppose @xmath133 . from theorem [ thm : gromov_hyperbolic_ac ] , @xmath35 admits an injective extension @xmath270 . let @xmath271 and @xmath272 be a sequence which represents @xmath273 . since @xmath35 is asymptotically surjective , there is a sequence @xmath93 in @xmath4 such that @xmath274 . let @xmath249 be the equivalence class of @xmath93 . then , the condition @xmath274 implies that @xmath275 . hence @xmath251 is surjective . suppose @xmath35 admits a bijective extension @xmath247 . from theorem [ thm : gromov_hyperbolic_ac ] again , @xmath35 is asymptotically conservative . let @xmath272 be a convergent sequence in @xmath33 at infinity . let @xmath273 be the equivalence class of @xmath272 . since @xmath251 is surjective , there is @xmath248 such that @xmath275 . let @xmath93 be a sequence representing @xmath249 . the condition @xmath275 implies that @xmath274 . hence , @xmath35 is asymptotically surjective . [ prop : closeness_on_hyperbolic_space ] let @xmath4 and @xmath33 be gromov hyperbolic spaces . for @xmath276 , @xmath41 is close to @xmath42 at infinity if and only if their extensions coincide . suppose that @xmath41 and @xmath42 are close at infinity . for @xmath128 , let @xmath277 be the extension of @xmath126 . let @xmath248 and @xmath36 a sequence representing @xmath249 . since @xmath41 and @xmath42 are close at infinity , from , @xmath278 . this means that @xmath279 . conversely , suppose that @xmath280 on @xmath7 . let @xmath43 and @xmath44 be sequences with @xmath45 . this means that they represent the same boundary point , say @xmath248 . from the assumption @xmath279 . since @xmath281 is a representative of @xmath282 for @xmath128 , we deduce that @xmath121 is equivalent to @xmath122 , and hence , @xmath283 since @xmath33 is gromov hyperbolic . thus , we conclude that @xmath41 is close to @xmath42 at infinity . let @xmath4 be a gromov hyperbolic space . let @xmath284 . we define the gromov product between @xmath249 and @xmath273 by @xmath285 where the infimum is taken over all sequences @xmath286 and @xmath287 . notice that the gromov product takes values in @xmath288 $ ] , that @xmath289 if and only if @xmath268 . we also define the gromov product between @xmath223 and @xmath248 by @xmath290 where the infimum is taken over all sequences @xmath286 . one can show that when @xmath4 is gromov @xmath242-hyperbolic , @xmath291 for all @xmath292 ( cf . 2.2.1 in @xcite ) . the gromov boundary admits a _ visual metric _ @xmath293 with the following property : for any @xmath80 , there is @xmath294 such that for @xmath295 , there exist a distance @xmath293 on @xmath7 and positive constants @xmath296 such that @xmath297 for @xmath284 ( cf . theorem 2.2.7 in @xcite ) . we call a gromov hyperbolic space @xmath4 _ boundary continuous _ if the gromov product is continuous on @xmath298 in the sense that for any @xmath299 and sequences @xmath286 and @xmath287 in @xmath4 , @xmath300 as @xmath301 for every @xmath80 ( cf . 3.4.2 in @xcite ) . it is known that every proper @xmath302-space is a boundary continuous gromov hyperbolic space ( cf . proposition 3.4.2 in @xcite ) . [ prop : ac_boundarycontinuous ] let @xmath4 and @xmath33 be boundary continuous gromov hyperbolic spaces . let @xmath34 be a mapping . then , @xmath150 if and only if @xmath35 is extendable and the extension @xmath251 is a continuous injection . suppose @xmath4 and @xmath33 are @xmath242-hyperbolic . from theorem [ thm : gromov_hyperbolic_ac ] , a mapping @xmath34 is in @xmath108 if and only if @xmath35 is extendable and the extension @xmath251 is injective . hence , it suffices to check only that the extension @xmath251 of @xmath150 is continuous . let @xmath248 . let @xmath303 be a convergent sequence to @xmath249 . let @xmath304 be a sequence representing @xmath305 . since @xmath4 and @xmath33 are boundary continuous , for any @xmath306 there is an @xmath307 such that when @xmath308 , @xmath309 let @xmath310 . from , @xmath311 since @xmath312 , by , @xmath313 therefore , from and , we see that @xmath314 represents @xmath249 . since @xmath251 is the extension of @xmath35 , @xmath315 represents @xmath250 . from , @xmath316 by , we get @xmath317 and hence @xmath318 converges to @xmath250 from . thus , we conclude that the extension @xmath251 is continuous . let @xmath319 be the set of self - mappings @xmath35 of @xmath4 with the following properties : 1 . @xmath35 is extendable and the extension @xmath251 is bijective ; 2 . the inverse @xmath251 on @xmath7 is also the extension of a mapping of @xmath4 . notice from proposition [ prop : gromov_hyperbolic_asymptotic_surjective ] that @xmath319 is canonically identified with @xmath51 . we consider the @xmath319 as a monoid . we define an equivalent relation on @xmath319 as follows : we say that two @xmath320 are equivalent if their extensions @xmath321 and @xmath322 satisfy @xmath280 on @xmath7 . from the definition , this equivalent relation is a semigroup congruence . hence , the quotient semigroup @xmath323 is a semigroup . from proposition [ prop : closeness_on_hyperbolic_space ] , we conclude the following characterization . [ thm : acgroup_hyperbolic_group ] let @xmath4 be a gromov hyperbolic space . then the group @xmath52 is canonically isomorphic to @xmath323 . namely , the identification @xmath324 induces an isomorphism @xmath325 . [ [ boundary - continuous - hyperbolic - spaces ] ] * boundary continuous hyperbolic spaces * + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + suppose @xmath4 is a boundary continuous gromov hyperbolic space . let @xmath326 be the set of self - mappings @xmath35 of @xmath4 with the following properties : 1 . @xmath35 is extendable and the extension @xmath251 is a homeomorphism ; 2 . the inverse @xmath251 on @xmath7 is also the extension of a mapping of @xmath4 . notice from propositions [ prop : gromov_hyperbolic_asymptotic_surjective ] and [ prop : ac_boundarycontinuous ] that @xmath326 is canonically identified with @xmath51 . we define @xmath327 as above . [ thm : acgroup_hyperbolic_group_boundary_continuous ] let @xmath4 be a boundary continuous gromov hyperbolic space . then the group @xmath52 is canonically isomorphic to @xmath327 . namely , the identification @xmath328 induces an isomorphism @xmath329 . in this section , we recall basics in the teichmller theory . for details on the contents of this section , the reader can refer to @xcite , @xcite , @xcite and @xcite . let @xmath54 be a compact orientable surface . we denote the _ complexity _ of @xmath54 by @xmath330 the euler characteristic of @xmath54 is denoted by @xmath331 . throughout this paper , we always assume that @xmath332 . the _ teichmller space _ @xmath333 of @xmath54 is the set of equivalence classes of marked riemann surfaces @xmath334 where @xmath33 is a riemann surface of analytically finite type and @xmath335 is an orientation preserving homeomorphism . two marked riemann surfaces @xmath336 and @xmath337 are _ teichmller equivalent _ if there is a conformal mapping @xmath338 which is homotopic to @xmath339 . teichmller space @xmath55 has a canonical complete distance , called the _ teichmller distance @xmath340 _ , and defined by the equation in [ subsubsec : analytic_aspect ] . it is known that the teichmller space @xmath333 of @xmath54 is homeomorphic to @xmath341 . throughout this paper , we fix a conformal structure @xmath4 on @xmath54 and consider @xmath30 as the base point of the teichmller space @xmath55 of @xmath54 . for the details about the contents in this section , see for instance @xcite and @xcite . let @xmath342 be the set of homotopy classes of non - trivial and non - peripheral simple closed curves on @xmath54 . consider the set of weighted simple close curves @xmath343 , where @xmath344 is the formal product between @xmath345 and @xmath346 . we embed @xmath347 into the space @xmath348 of non - negative functions on @xmath342 by @xmath349\in { \mathbb{r}_{+}^{\mathcal{s}}}\ ] ] where @xmath350 is the geometric intersection number on @xmath342 . we topologize @xmath348 with the topology of pointwise convergence . the closure @xmath351 of the image of the mapping is called the _ space of measured foliations _ on @xmath54 . the space @xmath348 admits a canonical action of @xmath352 by multiplication . this action leaves @xmath351 invariant . the quotient space @xmath353 is said to be the _ space of projective measured foliations_. by definition , @xmath351 contains @xmath347 as a dense subset . the intersection number function on @xmath347 defined by @xmath354 extends continuously on @xmath355 . it is known that @xmath351 and @xmath356 are homeomorphic to @xmath341 and @xmath357 , respectively . [ [ normal - forms ] ] * normal forms * + + + + + + + + + + + + + + any @xmath358 is represented by a pair @xmath359 of a singular foliation @xmath360 and a transverse measure @xmath361 to @xmath360 . the intersection number @xmath362 , @xmath346 , is obtained as @xmath363 the _ support _ of a measured foliation is , by definition , the minimal essential subsurface containing the underlying foliation . a measured foliation is said to be _ arational _ if it intersects any non - trivial and non - peripheral simple closed curve in its support . according to the structure of the underlying foliation of @xmath187 , any @xmath358 has the _ normal form _ : any measured foliation @xmath358 is decomposed as @xmath364 where @xmath365 is an arational foliation in its support @xmath366 , @xmath367 and @xmath368 are simple closed curves such that each @xmath367 can not be deformed into any @xmath366 and @xmath368 is homotopic to a component of @xmath369 for some @xmath370 ( cf . 2.4 of @xcite ) . in this paper , we call @xmath365 , @xmath367 and @xmath368 an _ arational component _ , an _ essential curve _ , and a _ peripheral curve _ of @xmath187 respectively . [ [ null - sets ] ] * null sets * + + + + + + + + + + + for a measured foliation @xmath187 , we denote by @xmath371 the measured foliation defined from @xmath187 by deleting the foliated annuli associated to the peripheral curves in @xmath187 . the following might be well - known . however , we give a proof of the proposition for completeness : in the following proposition , we define the null set of @xmath187 by @xmath372 notice that this definition coincides with the definition of null sets in the general situation given in later ( cf . [ subset : associated_foliation ] ) . [ prop : measured_foliation_removing_peripehral ] let @xmath373 . then , the following are equivalent . * @xmath374 . * @xmath371 is topologically equivalent to @xmath375 . suppose ( 1 ) holds . we decompose @xmath187 as : @xmath376 since @xmath377 , the decomposition of @xmath378 is represented as @xmath379 where @xmath380 is either topologically equivalent to @xmath365 or is @xmath381 , @xmath382 and the support of @xmath383 is contained in the complement of the support of @xmath187 . in the summation @xmath384 in , @xmath385 rums over all component of @xmath369 . see proposition 3.2 of ivanov @xcite or lemma 3.1 of papadopoulos @xcite . indeed , ivanov in @xcite works under the assumption that each @xmath365 is a stable lamination for some pseudo - anosov mapping on @xmath366 . however , we can easily check that his discussion in the proof of the proposition can be applied to our case . if @xmath386 , there is an @xmath387 with @xmath388 but @xmath389 . since @xmath390 from the assumption , this is a contradiction . hence @xmath391 suppose @xmath392 for some @xmath370 . since @xmath393 is essential , we can find an @xmath346 such that @xmath394 . such an @xmath395 satisfies @xmath396 , which is a contradiction . with the same argument , we can see that @xmath397 . thus , @xmath398 are topologically equivalent . suppose ( 2 ) holds . let @xmath399 . consider the decomposition for @xmath400 instead of @xmath378 , one can easily deduce that @xmath401 . let @xmath4 be a riemann surface and let @xmath402 be a doubly connected domain on @xmath4 . if @xmath402 is conformally equivalent to a round annulus @xmath403 , we define the _ modulus _ of @xmath402 by @xmath404 _ extremal length _ of a simple closed curve @xmath395 on @xmath4 is defined by @xmath405 the extremal length has various definitions ( cf . @xcite and @xcite ) . definition is called the _ geometric definition_. in @xcite , kerckhoff showed that if we define the extremal length of @xmath406 by @xmath407 then the extremal length function @xmath408 on @xmath347 extends continuously to @xmath351 . for @xmath409 and @xmath358 , we define @xmath410 we define the _ unit sphere _ in @xmath351 by @xmath411 the projection @xmath412 induces a homeomorphism @xmath413 . it is known that for any @xmath358 and @xmath409 , there is a unique holomorphic quadratic differential @xmath414 such that @xmath415 namely , the _ vertical foliation _ of @xmath414 is equal to @xmath187 . we call @xmath414 the _ hubbard - masur differential _ for @xmath187 on @xmath416 ( cf . @xcite ) . the hubbard - masur differential @xmath417 for @xmath187 on @xmath418 satisfies @xmath419 in particular , it is known that @xmath420 where @xmath421 is the length of the geodesic representative homotopic to @xmath422 with respect to the singular flat metric @xmath423 . [ [ kerckhoffs - formula ] ] * kerckhoff s formula * + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + as we noted in [ subsec : background_motivation ] , the teichmller distance @xmath340 is expressed by extremal length , which we call _ kerckhoff s formula _ : @xmath424 ( see @xcite ) . since @xmath356 is compact , for any @xmath425 , there are @xmath426 such that @xmath427 in fact , such @xmath400 and @xmath187 are unique up to multiplying by positive constants , and are realized as the horizontal and vertical foliations of a holomorphic quadratic differential which defines a teichmller geodesic connecting @xmath428 and @xmath429 ( cf . @xcite and [ subsec : teichmuller_rays ] ) . [ [ minskys - inequality ] ] * minsky s inequality * + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + minsky @xcite observed the following inequality , which we recently call _ minsky s inequality _ : @xmath430 for @xmath431 and @xmath426 . minsky s inequality is sharp in the sense that for any @xmath431 and @xmath432 , there is a unique @xmath358 up to multiplication by a positive constant such that @xmath433 ( cf . @xcite ) . let @xmath434 and @xmath435\in \mathcal{pmf}$ ] . by the ahlfors - bers theorem , we can define an isometric embedding @xmath436 with respect to the teichmller distance by assigning the solution of the beltrami equation defined by the teichmller beltrami differential @xmath437 for @xmath345 . we call @xmath438 the _ teichmller ( geodesic ) ray _ associated to @xmath435\in \mathcal{pmf}$ ] . notice that the differential depends only on the projective class of @xmath187 . combining teichmller s theorem and the height theorem for holomorphic quadratic differentials ( cf . @xcite ) , we obtain the _ exponential map _ @xmath439,t ) \mapsto r_{g , t}(t)\in { \mathcal{t}}\ ] ] which is a homeomorphism ( see also @xcite ) . in this section , we recall a natural compactification of teichmller space @xmath55 in terms of extremal length geometry , which is called the _ gardiner - masur closure _ or the _ gardiner - masur compactification_. we will also recall the unification of extremal length geometry via intersection number . our unification gives a link between the gromov product on @xmath440 and intersection number on @xmath351 . the thurston theory with respect to the geometry of teichmller space ( with hyperbolic geometry ) is developed with the measured foliations and the intersection number function . the unification allows us to discuss the thurston theory of the geometry of teichmller space with extremal length . let @xmath441 for @xmath431 . we define a continuous function @xmath442 on @xmath351 by @xmath443 for @xmath432 . consider a mapping @xmath444 \in { \mathbb{r}_{+}^{\mathcal{s}}}\\ \psi_{gm}&\colon { \mathcal{t}}\ni y\mapsto [ \mathcal{s}\ni \alpha\mapsto \mathcal{e}_y(\alpha ) ] \in { \mathbb{r}_{+}^{\mathcal{s}}}.\end{aligned}\ ] ] as we noticed in [ subsec : measured_foliations ] , the space @xmath348 is topologized with pointwise convergence and it has a natural action by multiplication by positive constants . let @xmath445 be the quotient mapping of the action . in @xcite , gardiner and masur showed that the mapping @xmath446 is an embedding with compact closure . the closure @xmath447 of the image is called the _ gardiner - masur closure _ or the _ gardiner - masur compactification _ , and the complement @xmath448 is called the _ gardiner - masur boundary_. they also observed that the space @xmath356 of projective measured foliaitons is contained in @xmath449 . in @xcite and @xcite , the author observed that for any @xmath450 , there is a unique non - negative continuous function @xmath451 on @xmath351 such that * the assignment @xmath452 represents @xmath249 ; * @xmath453 ; * for any sequence @xmath454 with @xmath455 , @xmath456 converges to @xmath451 uniformly on any compact set of @xmath351 . we define @xmath457 since @xmath458 , the space of @xmath351 of measured foliations is contained in @xmath459 and @xmath460 . in @xcite , the author established the following _ unification _ of extremal length geometry via the intersection number . [ thm : main_realization ] let @xmath461 be the base point taken as above . there is a unique continuous function @xmath462 with the following properties . * @xmath463 and @xmath464 for any @xmath450 , @xmath431 and @xmath432 . in particular , the projective class of the function @xmath465 is exactly the image of @xmath431 under the gardiner - masur embedding . * for @xmath466 , @xmath467 . * for @xmath466 and @xmath468 , @xmath469 . * for any @xmath470 , @xmath471 * for @xmath472 , the value @xmath473 is equal to the geometric intersection number @xmath474 between @xmath400 and @xmath187 . we define the _ extremal length _ of @xmath475 on @xmath431 by @xmath476 ( cf . corollary 3 in @xcite ) . by applying minsky s inequality and gardiner - masur s work in @xcite , coincides with the original extremal length when @xmath477 . we can see that @xmath478 is continuous on @xmath460 and satsfies @xmath479 for @xmath470 and @xmath475 ( cf . theorem 4 and proposition 7 in @xcite ) . the extremal length also satisfies the following _ generalized minsky inequality _ : @xmath480 for all @xmath431 and @xmath466 ( cf . corollary 4 of 8 in @xcite ) . the intersection number has the following _ subadditive property_. [ lem : subadditivity ] let @xmath472 with @xmath481 . then , for any @xmath475 we have @xmath482 let @xmath431 . then , we have @xmath483 hence , @xmath484 for @xmath485 . hence , the right - hand side of follows from the density of @xmath486 in @xmath460 . we prove the left - hand side of . we first show the case where @xmath400 and @xmath187 are rational . let @xmath487 and @xmath488 where @xmath489 are mutually disjoint and distinct simple closed curves and @xmath490 and @xmath491 . let @xmath431 and @xmath492 , @xmath493 @xmath494 be the characteristic annuli for @xmath495 , @xmath393 and @xmath496 of @xmath497 , where the _ characteristic annulus _ for @xmath346 is the maximal annulus foliated by closed trajectories homotopic to @xmath395 . from the geometric definition of extremal length , we have @xmath498 where is obtained from the extremality of the @xmath499-norm of the jenkins - strebel differentials ( cf . theorem 20.5 in @xcite ) . since @xmath486 is dense in @xmath460 , the above calculation implies @xmath500 for all @xmath475 . hence , the left - hand side of also follows from the density of the set of weighted multicurves in @xmath351 . recall that the embedding @xmath501 of @xmath447 into @xmath460 depends on the base point @xmath0 ( cf . [ subsec : gm_closure ] ) . we define the _ intersection number with base point @xmath0 _ by @xmath502 for @xmath503 ( cf . 8.2 in @xcite ) . since the intersection number is continuous , so is @xmath504 on the product @xmath505 . in particular , we can see that @xmath506,[h])=\frac{i(g , h)}{{{\rm ext}}_{x_0}(g)^{1/2}{{\rm ext}}_{x_0}(h)^{1/2}}\ ] ] for @xmath435,[h]\in \mathcal{pmf}\subset \partial_{gm}{\mathcal{t}}$ ] . the intersection number in the right - hand side of is the original intersection number on the space of measured foliations , as noticed in ( v ) of theorem [ thm : main_realization ] . from theorem [ thm : main_realization ] , teichmller space @xmath55 is _ boundary continuous _ in the sense that the gromov product @xmath507 on @xmath508 extends continuously to @xmath505 with values in the closed interval @xmath288 $ ] ( cf . corollary 1 in @xcite ) . we check that the relation visually indistinguishable " is not an equivalent relation on teichmller space when @xmath509 . this also implies that teichmller space @xmath440 is not gromov hyperbolic as remarked in [ subsec : background_motivation ] . indeed , let @xmath510 with @xmath511 , but @xmath512 . consider sequences @xmath85 , @xmath225 and @xmath217 in @xmath55 with @xmath513 $ ] , @xmath514 $ ] and @xmath515 $ ] in @xmath447 , where the projective classes @xmath516 $ ] , @xmath517 $ ] and @xmath518 $ ] are recognized as points in @xmath449 . then , @xmath519 , [ \beta])=0 \\ i_{x_0}(x_n , z_n ) & \to i_{x_0}([\alpha ] , [ \gamma])=0,\end{aligned}\ ] ] but @xmath520 , [ \gamma])\ne 0.\ ] ] from , these observations imply that @xmath521 but @xmath522 . we define the _ null set _ for @xmath523 by @xmath524 in this section , we will show the following . [ thm : null_set ] for any @xmath525 , there is @xmath526 with @xmath527 . the precise statement is given in [ subsec : proof_of_theorem_null_sets ] . indeed , we will see that measured foliations satisfying the statement in theorem [ thm : null_set ] are essentially unique . the following is known . [ prop : translation_null_space1 ] for @xmath528 , @xmath529 if and only if @xmath530 . in any case , @xmath531 . let @xmath525 . the projective class @xmath435\in \mathcal{pmf}$ ] is said to be an _ associated foliation _ for @xmath532 if there exist @xmath533 , a sequence @xmath534\in \mathcal{pmf}$ ] and @xmath535 such that @xmath536 and @xmath534\to [ g]$ ] as @xmath537 . we call the point @xmath538 the _ base point _ for the associated foliation @xmath435 $ ] . we denote by @xmath539 the set of associated foliations for @xmath532 . we define @xmath540 the set coincides with the set defined as when @xmath477 . [ lem : self - intersection ] the following hold : * @xmath541\in \mathcal{af}(\mathfrak{a})\}\subset { \mathcal{n}_{m\!f}}(\mathfrak{a})$ ] . * for @xmath435\in \mathcal{af}(\mathfrak{a})$ ] , we have @xmath542 and @xmath543 . ( 1)let @xmath435\in \mathcal{af}(\mathfrak{a})$ ] . take @xmath533 , @xmath544\}_{n\in \mathbb{n}}\subset\mathcal{pmf}$ ] , and @xmath535 such that @xmath536 and @xmath545 as @xmath537 . since the projection @xmath546 is continuous , from proposition 1 in @xcite , we can see that @xmath547 converges to @xmath548 which is projectively equivalent to @xmath532 . therefore @xmath549 and @xmath550 . ( 2)let @xmath551 . take @xmath533 , @xmath544\}_{n\in \mathbb{n}}\subset\mathcal{pmf}$ ] , @xmath535 , and @xmath552 as above . from generalized minsky s inequality , we have @xmath553 and @xmath554 . from the definition , @xmath555 and we are done . we define for @xmath528 , @xmath556\in \mathcal{af}(\mathfrak{a})}{\mathcal{n}_{m\!f}}(g ) \subset \mathcal{mf}. \ ] ] from ( 2 ) of lemma [ lem : self - intersection ] , we obtain @xmath557\in \mathcal{af}(\mathfrak{a})}{\mathcal{n}_{m\!f}}(g ) \subset \mathcal{an}(\mathfrak{a}).\ ] ] the following proposition implies that the converse holds for simple closed curves . [ prop : vanish - intersection ] @xmath558 for all @xmath528 . let @xmath559 . let @xmath435\in \mathcal{af}(\mathfrak{a})$ ] with @xmath388 . then , there are @xmath533 , a sequence @xmath544\}_{n\in \mathbb{n}}$ ] converging to @xmath435 $ ] and @xmath535 such that @xmath560 tends to @xmath561 as @xmath537 . let @xmath562 . here , we refer to the argument in theorem 3.1 of @xcite ( see also @xcite ) . let @xmath563 be the critical vertical graph of the holomorphic quadratic differential of @xmath564 . we add mutually disjoint critical vertical segments to @xmath563 emanating from critical points to get a graph @xmath565 whose edges are all vertical . the degree of a vertex @xmath565 is one - prong if it is one of endpoints of an added vertical segment . take @xmath566 sufficiently small such that the @xmath567-neighborhood @xmath568 ( with respect to the @xmath569-metric ) is embedded in @xmath4 . then , as the argument in the proof of theorem 3.1 in @xcite , by shrinking with a factor @xmath570 , we get a canonical conformal embedding @xmath571 such that @xmath572 . since @xmath573 , @xmath395 can be deformed into @xmath568 . hence , by from the geometric definition of extremal length , the conformal embedding @xmath571 induces @xmath574 for some @xmath575 independent of @xmath576 . let @xmath566 . take @xmath577 such that @xmath578 . since @xmath534\to [ g]$ ] , by , there exists an @xmath579 such that @xmath580 and @xmath581 for @xmath582 . it has shown from lemma 1 of @xcite that a function @xmath583 is a non - increasing function for any @xmath432 . hence , we have @xmath584 since @xmath585 , @xmath547 converges to @xmath548 which is projectively equivalent to @xmath532 . therefore , we get @xmath586 and hence @xmath587 . this means that @xmath588 . [ coro : charcterization_vanishing_curves ] let @xmath528 . for any @xmath435\in \mathcal{af}(\mathfrak{a})$ ] , we have @xmath589 in particular , for @xmath435\in \mathcal{af}(\mathfrak{a})$ ] , @xmath590 depends only on @xmath532 . let @xmath435\in \mathcal{af}(\mathfrak{a})$ ] . from ( 2 ) of lemma [ lem : self - intersection ] , and proposition [ prop : vanish - intersection ] , we have @xmath591\in \mathcal{af}(\mathfrak{a})}{\mathcal{n}_{m\!f}}(g))\cap \mathcal{s } = \mathcal{an}(\mathfrak{a})\cap \mathcal{s } \\ & \subset \mathcal{n}(\mathfrak{a})\cap \mathcal{s},\end{aligned}\ ] ] which implies what we wanted . let @xmath528 . let @xmath592 be the minimal essential subsurface of @xmath4 which contains all simple closed curve in @xmath593 . we call @xmath592 the _ vanishing surface _ for @xmath532 . by definition , any component @xmath594 of @xmath592 contains a collection of curves in @xmath593 which fills up @xmath594 . if a component of @xmath592 is an annulus , the core is in @xmath595 . from lemma [ lem : fills_curves ] in appendix , if @xmath346 can be deformed into @xmath592 , then @xmath587 ( see also theorem 6.1 of @xcite ) . it is possible that either @xmath593 or @xmath592 is empty . let @xmath435\in \mathcal{af}(\mathfrak{a})$ ] . we decompose @xmath187 into disjoint measured foliations as in : @xmath596 let @xmath366 be the support of @xmath365 . we may assume that any two elements of @xmath597 are mutually disjoint . [ prop : betas ] let @xmath435\in \mathcal{af}(\mathfrak{a})$ ] . for @xmath346 , the following are equivalent . * @xmath395 is homotopic to a component of @xmath598 . * @xmath395 is homotopic to either an essential curve or a peripheral curve of @xmath187 . _ ( 1 ) implies ( 2)._we first assume that @xmath395 is homotopic to a component of @xmath598 . since @xmath587 , from corollary [ coro : charcterization_vanishing_curves ] , we have @xmath599 , that is , @xmath573 . suppose that @xmath395 is non - peripheral in a component @xmath600 of the complement of the support of @xmath187 . then , there is an @xmath601 which is non - peripheral in @xmath600 satisfying @xmath602 . since @xmath603 , @xmath604 by corollary [ coro : charcterization_vanishing_curves ] this means that @xmath395 can not be homotopic to a component of @xmath598 because @xmath592 contains a regular neighborhood of @xmath605 . this contradicts our assumption . hence , @xmath395 is homotopic to either an essential curve or a component of @xmath369 for some @xmath370 . _ ( 2 ) implies ( 1)._suppose @xmath395 is homotopic to either an essential curve or a component of @xmath369 for some @xmath370 . since @xmath573 , @xmath606 by corollary [ coro : charcterization_vanishing_curves ] therefore , @xmath395 can be deformed into the vanishing surface @xmath592 . suppose to the contrary that @xmath395 is non - peripheral in @xmath592 . then , there is a non - peripheral curve @xmath242 in a component @xmath592 with @xmath607 . since @xmath608 , we have @xmath609 by corollary [ coro : charcterization_vanishing_curves ] . if @xmath242 is a component of some @xmath369 , @xmath610 by lemma 2.14 of @xcite . hence @xmath611 by corollary [ coro : charcterization_vanishing_curves ] again , which contradicts that @xmath612 . hence , @xmath242 is non - peripheral in a component of the complement of the support of @xmath187 . therefore , so is @xmath395 , since @xmath607 . this is also a contradiction . thus , we get the following decomposition theorem ( cf . figure [ fig : decomposition ] ) . [ thm : decomposition ] for any @xmath528 , the reference surface @xmath4 is decomposed into a union of closed essential surfaces with mutually disjoint interiors as @xmath613 and each @xmath366 contains an arational foliation @xmath614 filling on @xmath366 for @xmath615 satisfying the following properties : for all @xmath435\in \mathcal{af}(\mathfrak{a})$ ] . * @xmath616 is a subsurface of the vanishing surface @xmath592 defined by deleting annular components whose core is homotopic to an essential curve of @xmath187 . in addition , @xmath616 is independent of the choice of @xmath435\in \mathcal{af}(\mathfrak{a})$ ] . * each @xmath366 is the support of an arational component @xmath365 of @xmath187 . in addition , an arational component of @xmath187 which contained in @xmath366 is topologically equivalent to @xmath614 for @xmath615 . * @xmath617 is a pair of pants with the property that components of @xmath618 are homotopic to among a loop around a puncture of @xmath4 , an essential curve of @xmath187 , or a peripheral curve of @xmath187 . * @xmath619 is an annulus whose core is homotopic to some essential curve of @xmath187 . conversely , any essential curve of @xmath187 is the core of some @xmath619 . in particular , the decomposition is independent of @xmath435\in \mathcal{af}(\mathfrak{a})$ ] . we say that two measured foliations @xmath620 and @xmath621 are _ topologically equivalent _ if the underlying foliations of @xmath620 and @xmath621 are modified by whitehead operations to foliations with trivalent singularities such that the resulting foliations ( without transversal measures ) are isotopic ( cf . 3.1 of @xcite ) . let @xmath435\in \mathcal{af}(\mathfrak{a})$ ] . we decompose @xmath187 as in . we first notice the following : let @xmath395 be any non - peripheral curve in @xmath622 . since @xmath395 can not be deformed into @xmath592 , @xmath611 , which implies @xmath623 from corollary [ coro : charcterization_vanishing_curves ] . let @xmath600 be a component of @xmath622 . since @xmath592 is essential , @xmath600 can be neither a disc nor a punctured disc whose core is homotopic to a peripheral curve of @xmath4 . [ [ case-1 . ] ] * case 1 . * + + + + + + + + suppose first that @xmath600 is neither an annulus nor a pair of pants . then , @xmath600 contains a curve @xmath395 which is non - peripheral in @xmath600 , that is , @xmath395 can not be deformed into @xmath592 . from corollary [ coro : charcterization_vanishing_curves ] , we have @xmath623 . notice from ( 1 ) of lemma [ lem : self - intersection ] , essential curves and peripheral curves of @xmath187 are deformed into @xmath592 . hence , @xmath395 must intersect an arational component @xmath365 of @xmath187 . we check that @xmath624 in the homotopy sense . we first check @xmath625 . indeed , otherwise , there would be a component @xmath385 of @xmath626 which intersects non - trivially to @xmath366 . this means that @xmath627 and hence @xmath628 from corollary [ coro : charcterization_vanishing_curves ] . since any component of @xmath629 is either in @xmath595 or homotopic to a cusp of @xmath4 , this is a contradiction . notice also that any component @xmath385 of @xmath369 is peripheral in @xmath600 , because otherwise @xmath630 , as we checked in the previous paragraph . thus , we conclude that @xmath631 is a deformation retract . since any arational foliation is minimal in its support , the topological equivalence of arational components with common support follows from theorem 1.1 in @xcite . thus , we deduce @xmath632 hence we conclude ( 2 ) . [ [ case-2 . ] ] * case 2 . * + + + + + + + + + let us return to the proof of theorem [ thm : decomposition ] . if @xmath600 is a pair of pants , since @xmath600 is a component of @xmath622 , any component of @xmath629 is either peripheral in @xmath4 or homotopic to a component of @xmath598 . therefore , the condition ( 3 ) follows from proposition [ prop : betas ] . [ [ case-3 . ] ] * case 3 . * + + + + + + + + + before dealing with the remaining case , we check the following claim , which implies ( 1 ) that @xmath616 is independent of the choice of @xmath435\in \mathcal{af}(\mathfrak{a})$ ] . [ claim : essential_curves ] essential curves of the associated foliation to @xmath532 are uniquely determined in the sense that for any @xmath633,[g_2]\in \mathcal{af}(\mathfrak{a})$ ] , any essential curve of @xmath634 is a curve of @xmath635 , and vice versa . let @xmath636 be an essential curve of @xmath634 . suppose on the contrary that @xmath636 is not an essential curve in @xmath635 . notice from ( 2 ) of lemma [ lem : self - intersection ] and that arational components of @xmath634 and @xmath635 are topologically equivalent since @xmath637 . therefore , there is a curve @xmath346 such that @xmath638 but @xmath639 . namely , such an @xmath395 satisfies @xmath640 but @xmath641 , which is a contradiction since @xmath642 from corollary [ coro : charcterization_vanishing_curves ] . [ [ case-4 . ] ] * case 4 . * + + + + + + + + + finally , we deal with ( 4 ) . suppose that @xmath600 is an annulus . since a component of @xmath629 is a component of @xmath598 , the core @xmath242 of @xmath600 is homotopic to a component of @xmath598 . by proposition [ prop : betas ] , @xmath242 is either an essential curve or a peripheral curve of @xmath187 . suppose @xmath242 is a peripheral curve of @xmath187 . let @xmath643 and @xmath644 be components of @xmath592 with @xmath645 and @xmath646 . it is possible that @xmath647 when the core of @xmath600 is non - separating in @xmath4 . however , it is impossible that either @xmath643 or @xmath644 is an annulus . indeed , if @xmath643 is an annulus , from the minimality of @xmath592 , @xmath643 is absorbed into @xmath644 , which is a contradiction . since @xmath242 is a peripheral curve of @xmath187 and @xmath643 , @xmath644 and @xmath600 are essential in @xmath4 , from the definition , either @xmath643 or @xmath644 intersects non - trivially the support of an arational component of @xmath187 in the sense that either @xmath648 or @xmath649 contains a non - annular subsurface @xmath650 such that a component of @xmath651 is homotopic to @xmath242 . however , from corollary [ coro : charcterization_vanishing_curves ] , the support of any arational component of @xmath187 can not contains any vanishing curve , which is a contradiction . hence , the core @xmath242 of @xmath600 is an essential curve of @xmath187 . conversely , let @xmath636 be an essential curve of @xmath187 which does not appear as the core of an annular component of @xmath592 . notice from the definition that @xmath636 can not be homotopic to a component of @xmath369 for any @xmath615 . proposition [ prop : betas ] asserts that @xmath636 is homotopic to a component of @xmath598 . since any curve intersecting @xmath636 is not contained in @xmath592 and @xmath636 is essential , boundaries of an annulus having @xmath636 as its core should be either a component of @xmath598 or a component of the boundary of some @xmath617 . in either case , @xmath636 is the core of an annular component of @xmath622 . from proposition [ prop : measured_foliation_removing_peripehral ] and theorem [ thm : decomposition ] , we conclude the following . [ coro : uniqueness_associate_foliations ] for @xmath633,[g_2]\in \mathcal{af}(\mathfrak{a})$ ] , @xmath652 and @xmath653 are topologically equivalent . we first check the following . [ prop : zeros_topologically_equivalent ] let @xmath435\in \mathcal{af}(\mathfrak{a})$ ] . let @xmath432 be a measured foliation which is topologically equivalent to an arational component of @xmath187 . then , @xmath654 . take @xmath533 , @xmath534\in \mathcal{pmf}$ ] , and @xmath535 such that @xmath655 and @xmath545 as @xmath537 . let @xmath656 . let @xmath657 be the geodesic current associated to the singular flat structure defined as @xmath658 given by duchin , leininger and rafi in @xcite . suppose on the contrary that @xmath659 . then , by proposition 4 in @xcite , @xmath660 is a stable sequence in the sense that the set of accumulation points of @xmath661 in the space of geodesic currents is contained in @xmath662 ( as geodesic currents ) . in addition , any accumulation point @xmath663 satisfies that @xmath664 for some @xmath665 and any @xmath666 ( see proposition 5 in @xcite ) . let @xmath667 be an arational component of @xmath187 which is topologically equivalent to @xmath400 and @xmath668 be the support of @xmath667 . from , @xmath669 . hence , if @xmath670 has a component @xmath671 whose support intersects @xmath668 , then @xmath671 is topologically equivalent to @xmath667 ( cf . this means that @xmath672 , which contradicts to . in this section , we deal with an inequality for intersection number between two points in the core @xmath460 . [ lem : intersection_number ] let @xmath673 and @xmath435\in \mathcal{af}(\mathfrak{a})$ ] and @xmath674\in \mathcal{af}(\mathfrak{b})$ ] . let @xmath538 and @xmath416 be base points for the associated foliations @xmath435 $ ] and @xmath674 $ ] respectively . then , there is an @xmath675\in \overline{\mathcal{af}(\mathfrak{a})}$ ] in @xmath356 such that @xmath676 where @xmath677 . by definition , there are @xmath544\}_{n\in \mathbb{n}}$ ] , @xmath678\}_{n\in \mathbb{n}}\subset \mathcal{pmf}$ ] and @xmath679 such that * @xmath680,x}(t_n)\to { { \rm proj}}(\mathfrak{a})$ ] and @xmath681,y}(s_n)\to { { \rm proj}}(\mathfrak{b})$ ] as @xmath537 ; * @xmath545 and @xmath682 as @xmath537 . for simplicity , let @xmath683,x}(t_n)$ ] and @xmath684,y}(s_n)$ ] . since @xmath685 and @xmath686 , we deduce @xmath687 where @xmath688 . from the assumption , @xmath689 and @xmath690 converge @xmath561 and @xmath691 . since @xmath692 @xmath693 and @xmath694 converge to @xmath695 and @xmath696 , respectively . this implies the left - hand side of the desired inequality . let @xmath697 , @xmath698 and @xmath699 as above . take @xmath700 such that @xmath701 . fix @xmath702 . let @xmath703 and @xmath704 such that @xmath705 . notice that @xmath706 then , by taking a subsequence ( or by the diagonal argument ) , we may assume that @xmath707 as @xmath708 for each @xmath709 , and @xmath710 converges to @xmath711 . since @xmath712 , @xmath713 $ ] is an associated foliation for @xmath532 with base point @xmath714 . therefore , the limit @xmath675 $ ] is contained in the closure of @xmath539 in @xmath356 . from theorem [ thm : main_realization ] , we deduce @xmath715 since @xmath703 . letting @xmath708 , we conclude @xmath716 thus , if @xmath537 in , we have @xmath717 since @xmath718 , we have the assertion . we are ready to prove theorem [ thm : null_set ] . indeed , we show the following theorem . [ thm : associated_foliations_and_null_sets ] let @xmath525 . then , any @xmath435\in \mathcal{af}(\mathfrak{a})$ ] satisfies @xmath719 . from lemma [ lem : self - intersection ] , @xmath542 . hence , we shall show the converse . we first claim that @xmath720 for @xmath435\in \mathcal{af}(\mathfrak{a})$ ] . we decompose @xmath187 as : @xmath721 let @xmath722 . then , @xmath378 can be decomposed as @xmath723 where @xmath382 , @xmath380 is a measured foliation topologically equivalent to @xmath724 ( possibly @xmath725 ) , and @xmath726 is a measured foliation whose support is contained in the complement of the support of @xmath187 ( cf . @xcite ) . from theorem [ thm : decomposition ] , the support of @xmath726 is contained in @xmath727 and hence @xmath728 . since any component of @xmath369 is deformed into @xmath592 , from lemma [ lem : subadditivity ] and proposition [ prop : zeros_topologically_equivalent ] , we have @xmath729 and hence @xmath730 . the converse follows from lemma [ lem : self - intersection ] . let @xmath731 and take @xmath732 such that such that @xmath701 as @xmath537 . let @xmath675\in \overline{\mathcal{af}(\mathfrak{a})}$ ] as lemma [ lem : intersection_number ] for @xmath532 and @xmath733 . to show that @xmath551 , it suffices to show that @xmath734 from lemma [ lem : intersection_number ] . let @xmath735 , @xmath736 such that @xmath737 . by taking a subsequence , we may assume that @xmath738 . then , @xmath739 $ ] is an associate foliation of @xmath733 . since @xmath731 and @xmath740 , we have @xmath741 . therefore , @xmath742 is decomposed as @xmath743 where @xmath744 is topologically equivalent to @xmath724 , @xmath382 , @xmath383 is a measured foliation whose support is contained in the complement of the support of @xmath187 . since @xmath675\in \overline{\mathcal{af}(\mathfrak{a})}$ ] , from corollary [ coro : uniqueness_associate_foliations ] , we can see that @xmath745 is decomposed as @xmath746 where @xmath747 is topologically equivalent to @xmath724 ( possibly @xmath748 ) and @xmath382 . from and , we have @xmath749 . since @xmath740 , we conclude that @xmath750 and hence @xmath751 as desired . before closing this section , we notice the following expected property . [ coro : topological_equivalence_null_set ] for @xmath373 , the following are equivalent : 1 . @xmath371 and @xmath375 are topologically equivalent ; 2 . @xmath374 ; 3 . @xmath752 . from proposition [ prop : measured_foliation_removing_peripehral ] , the conditions ( 1 ) and ( 2 ) are equivalent . since @xmath753 , ( 2 ) follows from ( 3 ) . hence , we need to show that ( 1 ) implies ( 3 ) . from the symmetry of the topological equivalence , it suffices to show that @xmath754 . let @xmath755 and @xmath756\in \mathcal{af}(\mathfrak{a})$ ] . then , @xmath757 from theorem [ thm : associated_foliations_and_null_sets ] . since @xmath375 is topologically equivalent to @xmath371 , by proposition [ prop : measured_foliation_removing_peripehral ] , we have @xmath758 . hence , by applying theorem [ thm : associated_foliations_and_null_sets ] again , we have @xmath759 and @xmath760 . in this section , we consider the group @xmath761 . let @xmath762 . for @xmath450 , we define the _ accumulation set _ @xmath763 as follows : @xmath764 is contained in @xmath765 if and only if there is a sequence @xmath766 such that @xmath455 and @xmath767 . notice that if a sequence @xmath225 converges to a point in @xmath447 , @xmath118 converges at infinity in the sense of . indeed , suppose @xmath118 converges to @xmath768 . then , from ( iv ) in theorem [ thm : main_realization ] , we have @xmath769 and hence @xmath770 as @xmath6 . for @xmath450 , we define the _ null set _ for @xmath249 by @xmath771 we claim [ prop : accumulation_point_accompany ] let @xmath772 . let @xmath773 be a sequence converging to @xmath255 for @xmath128 . then , the following are equivalent : 1 . @xmath774 ; 2 . @xmath775 . furthermore , @xmath776 if and only if @xmath777 . suppose @xmath778 . then , from ( iv ) in theorem [ thm : main_realization ] , @xmath779 and @xmath775 . conversely , suppose that @xmath775 . then , @xmath780 and @xmath774 . suppose that @xmath776 . let @xmath781 . since @xmath183 converges to @xmath782 , any accumulation point @xmath783 of @xmath93 satisfies @xmath784 and hence @xmath785 from the assumption . this means that any subsequence of @xmath93 contains a convergence subsequence which is contained in @xmath786 . hence , @xmath93 itself is contained in @xmath786 ( cf . ( 4 ) in remark [ remark : accompanying_sequence ] in [ subsec : gromov_product ] ) . suppose that @xmath777 . let @xmath787 . take a sequence @xmath93 converging to @xmath273 . then , @xmath788 as observed above . this means that @xmath789 and @xmath785 . the following lemma will be applied for defining the extension to the reduced gardiner - masur closure in [ subsec : extension_to_the_boundary ] . [ lem : equivalent_1 ] let @xmath790 . let @xmath772 and @xmath791 for @xmath128 . if @xmath776 , then @xmath792 . for @xmath128 , let @xmath254 be a sequence converging to @xmath255 such that @xmath793 converges to @xmath794 . from proposition [ prop : accumulation_point_accompany ] , the assumption @xmath776 implies @xmath134 . since @xmath790 , by propositions [ prop : quasi - surjective_asymptotic ] , we have @xmath795 . therefore , by applying proposition [ prop : accumulation_point_accompany ] again , we obtain @xmath792 . we define @xmath796 for a convergent sequence @xmath36 at infinity , where @xmath797 is the closure of @xmath93 in @xmath447 . [ prop : null_sets_and_accompany ] let @xmath36 be a convergent sequence at infinity . then , there is @xmath358 such that @xmath798).\ ] ] furthermore , the following are equivalent for @xmath783 : 1 . @xmath799)$ ] ; 2 . for any @xmath800 and @xmath801\in \mathcal{af}(\psi_{gm}(p))$ ] , @xmath802)$ ] ; 3 . for any @xmath800 @xmath803 . let @xmath804 be accumulation points of @xmath36 in @xmath447 . let @xmath212 be a subsequence of @xmath36 convergent to @xmath255 for @xmath128 . since @xmath36 converges at infinity , @xmath805 and hence @xmath806 for @xmath800 , fix @xmath801\in \mathcal{af}(\psi_{gm}(p))$ ] . from proposition [ prop : measured_foliation_removing_peripehral ] and theorem [ thm : associated_foliations_and_null_sets ] , the topological equivalence class of @xmath807 depends only on @xmath249 , and @xmath808 for all @xmath809 from . hence , we can find @xmath358 such that 1 . for any @xmath800 , @xmath807 is topologically equivalent to a subfoliation of @xmath187 ; 2 . any component of @xmath371 is topologically equivalent to a component of some @xmath810 , @xmath800 . we shall check that @xmath187 satisfies the desired property . indeed , let @xmath811 be an accumulation point of a sequence @xmath88 . then , by the argument above , we can see that @xmath812 for any @xmath800 . hence , for any @xmath674\in \mathcal{ah}(\psi_{gm}(q))$ ] , @xmath813 for all @xmath814 . from the condition ( 2 ) of @xmath187 , we have @xmath377 and hence @xmath815 by theorem [ thm : associated_foliations_and_null_sets ] . this means that @xmath799)$ ] and @xmath816).\ ] ] conversely , let @xmath799)$ ] . take a sequence @xmath93 in @xmath4 converging to @xmath273 . then , by the condition ( 1 ) of @xmath187 above , we have @xmath812 for all @xmath800 . in other words , any subsequence of @xmath36 contains a subsequence which is visually indistinguishable from @xmath93 . therefore , we have @xmath89 and hence @xmath88 ( cf . remark [ remark : accompanying_sequence ] ) . the last statement follows from the construction of @xmath187 and theorem [ thm : associated_foliations_and_null_sets ] . [ prop : accumulation_points_and_accompany ] let @xmath43 and @xmath44 be convergent sequences at infinity . then , the following are equivalent : 1 . @xmath817 ; 2 . @xmath818 . from the definition , the condition ( 2 ) implies ( 1 ) . suppose the condition ( 1 ) . assume on the contrary that there is @xmath819 . the condition @xmath820 means that there are subsequences @xmath821 of @xmath93 and @xmath822 of @xmath44 such that @xmath823 for all @xmath702 . hence , there are @xmath824 and @xmath825 such that @xmath826 ( cf . ) . hence , by proposition [ prop : null_sets_and_accompany ] , @xmath827 . since @xmath828 from the assumption , @xmath829 . on the other hand , since @xmath830 , @xmath831 . this is a contradiction . two points @xmath503 are equivalent if one of the following holds : * @xmath832 and @xmath268 ; * @xmath833 and @xmath834 . we denote by @xmath835}$ ] the equivalence class of @xmath450 . we abbreviate the equivalence class @xmath836]}$ ] of the projective class @xmath435\in \mathcal{pmf}\subset\partial_{gm}{\mathcal{t}}$ ] as @xmath837}$ ] . we denote by @xmath838 the quotient of @xmath447 under this equivalent relation . let @xmath839 be the quotient map . we always identify @xmath840 with @xmath55 . we call @xmath838 the _ reduced gardiner - masur closure _ of @xmath55 . from the definition , the space @xmath838 contains @xmath55 canonically . we call the complement @xmath841 the _ reduced gardiner - masur boundary _ of @xmath55 . let @xmath790 . we define the _ boundary extension _ @xmath842 to @xmath838 as follows . let @xmath768 . we define @xmath843 by @xmath844 } ) = \begin{cases } { [ [ \omega(p ) ] ] } & ( \mbox{$p\in { \mathcal{t}}$ } ) \\ { [ [ q ] ] } & ( \mbox{$q\in \mathcal{a}(\omega\colon p)$ if $ p\in \partial_{gm}{\mathcal{t}}$ } ) \end{cases}\ ] ] from lemma [ lem : equivalent_1 ] , the extension @xmath842 is well - defined . [ lem : composition ] let @xmath845 . then , the extensions satisify @xmath846 on @xmath847 . let @xmath835}\in { \partial_{gm}^{red}}{{\mathcal{t}}}$ ] . take @xmath848 such that @xmath849 and @xmath850 . by definition , @xmath851})={[[p']]}.\ ] ] on the other hand , we may assume that @xmath852 converges to @xmath853 . then , from the definition , we have @xmath854})={[[q]]}$ ] . since @xmath855 , @xmath856 and hence @xmath857}= { \partial_\infty(\omega_1)}({[[q]]})= { \partial_\infty(\omega_1)}\circ{\partial_\infty(\omega_2)}({[[p]]}).\ ] ] this means that @xmath858 on @xmath859 . [ lem : quasi - inverse ] let @xmath198 and @xmath50 be an asymptotic quasi - inverse of @xmath35 . then , the extensions satisfy @xmath860 on @xmath847 . it suffices to show only that @xmath861 on @xmath847 . let @xmath835}\in { \partial_{gm}^{red}}{{\mathcal{t}}}$ ] . take @xmath848 such that @xmath849 and @xmath862 . notice from the definition that @xmath863})={[[q]]}$ ] . let @xmath864 . we may assume that @xmath865 converges to some point @xmath866 . then , by definition , @xmath856 and hence @xmath867})= { \partial_\infty(\omega')}({[[q]]})={[[p']]}.\ ] ] let @xmath868 . take @xmath869 with @xmath870 . since @xmath50 is an asymptotic quasi - inverse of @xmath35 , @xmath48 is close to the identity mapping on @xmath55 . hence , @xmath871 since @xmath872 converges to @xmath873 , @xmath874 and @xmath875 since @xmath48 is asymptotically conservative by proposition [ prop : properties_quasimorphisms ] , @xmath876 . since @xmath36 converges to @xmath249 , we deduce that @xmath877 and @xmath878 . therefore , @xmath879 . let @xmath878 and @xmath880 a convergent sequence to @xmath881 . since @xmath48 is close to the identity mapping on @xmath55 , @xmath882 since @xmath872 converges to @xmath873 , we have @xmath883 and @xmath868 . we conclude that @xmath884 and hence @xmath885}={[[p]]}$ ] . thus , we obtain that @xmath886})={[[p']]}={[[p]]}$ ] , which is what we wanted . an ordered sequence @xmath887}\}_{k=1}^m$ ] in @xmath859 is said to be an _ _ adherence tower _ _ starting at @xmath888}$ ] if @xmath889 we call the number @xmath890 the _ length _ of the adherence tower . let @xmath835}\in { \partial_{gm}^{red}}{\mathcal{t}}$ ] . we define the _ height _ @xmath891})$ ] of @xmath835}$ ] by @xmath892})=\sup\{\mbox{lengths of adherence towers starting $ { [ [ p]]}$}\}.\ ] ] to prove the following lemma , we define the complexity of measured foliation as follows ( cf . theorem 1 in @xcite ) . for a measured foliation @xmath187 , we set @xmath597 be the supports of the arational components of @xmath187 . we define @xmath893 [ lem : height_boundary_points ] suppose that @xmath54 is neither a torus with one hole nor a sphere with four holes . the height of any @xmath835}\in { \partial_{gm}^{red}}{\mathcal{t}}$ ] satisfies @xmath891})\le { { \rm cx}}(s)$ ] . the equality @xmath891})={{\rm cx}}(s)$ ] holds if and only if the support of any @xmath435\in \mathcal{af}(\psi_{gm}(p))$ ] is a simple closed curve . we first study the associated foliations of points in an adherence tower of length two . let @xmath888},{[[p_2]]}\in { \partial_{gm}^{red}}{\mathcal{t}}$ ] . let @xmath894\in \mathcal{af}(\psi_{gm}(p_i))$ ] for @xmath128 . suppose that @xmath895},{[[p_2]]}\}$ ] is an adherence tower , that is , @xmath896 . from the definition , @xmath897 . from corollary [ coro : topological_equivalence_null_set ] , we see @xmath898 we decompose @xmath652 as in : @xmath899 where @xmath724 is an arational component , and @xmath393 is a ( weighted ) essential curve of @xmath634 . since @xmath900 , the composition of @xmath653 is represented as @xmath901 where @xmath744 is topologically equivalent to @xmath724 , @xmath902 and the support of @xmath903 is contained in the complement of the support of @xmath634 . since @xmath904 , any measured foliation @xmath432 with @xmath905 satisfies @xmath906 . hence , @xmath907 and @xmath908 . moreover , from the assumption @xmath909 implies that @xmath910 . therefore , from and , we have @xmath911 in the lexicographical order in @xmath912 , since @xmath903 in is either an arational component or an essential curve of @xmath635 . let us return to the proof of the lemma . let @xmath913}\}_{i=1}^m$ ] be an adherence tower of length @xmath890 . let @xmath894\in \mathcal{af}(\psi_{gm}(p_i))$ ] . from the argument argument , we have @xmath914 notice that the number of essential curves is at most @xmath915 and the euler - characteristic satisfies the inclusion - exclusion principle ( and the euler characteristic of a circle is zero ) . we should care about the case where the genus of @xmath54 is zero since the negative of the euler characteristic is greater than @xmath915 in this case . since any planer surface does not contain an essential subsurface of euler characteristic @xmath916 which admits an arational foliation , the first coordinate of @xmath917 rises at least by @xmath71 ( if it increases ) . therefore , in any case , we have @xmath918 . suppose that some @xmath365 contains an arational component @xmath919 . let @xmath920 be the support of @xmath919 . since @xmath920 contains a non - peripheral curve ( in @xmath920 ) and any component @xmath920 can not be an essential curves of @xmath921 for @xmath922 , the number of essential curves of @xmath923 is less than @xmath915 . therefore , by the above argument , we have @xmath924 . hence if @xmath925 , each @xmath365 consists of essential curves . in this case , one can easily see that the adherence tower starts with a simple closed curve . the _ extended mapping class group _ @xmath53 of @xmath54 is the group of all isotopy classes of homeomorphisms on @xmath54 . the extended mapping class group @xmath53 acts on @xmath55 isometrically by @xmath926_*(y)=(y , f\circ h^{-1})\in { \mathcal{t}}\ ] ] for @xmath927\in { { \rm mcg}}^*(s)$ ] . hence , we have a group homomorphism @xmath928\to [ h]_*\in { \rm isom}({\mathcal{t}}),\ ] ] where @xmath929 is the group of all isometries of @xmath55 . let @xmath58 be the complex of curves of @xmath54 and @xmath62 be the simplicial automorphisms on @xmath58 . since @xmath53 acts on @xmath58 canonically , we have a ( group ) homomorphism @xmath930 it is known that @xmath931 is an isomorphism if @xmath54 is neither a torus with two holes nor a closed surface of genus @xmath71 , and an epimorphism if @xmath54 is not a torus with two holes ( cf . ivanov @xcite , korkmaz @xcite and luo @xcite ) . the action of any isometry on @xmath55 extends homeomorphically to the gardiner - masur boundary ( cf . we can observe that the extension of the action leaves @xmath932 invariant , and it induces a canonical homomorphism @xmath933 such that the diagram @xmath61^{\mathcal{i}_0 } \ar[dr]_{\mathcal{j } } & { \rm isom}({\mathcal{t } } ) \ar[d]^{\mathcal{j}_1 } \\ & { \rm aut}({\mathbb{x}}(s ) ) & \\ } \ ] ] is commutative ( cf . @xcite ) . the homomorphism @xmath934 is an isomorphism for any @xmath54 with @xmath509 . we first sketch the proof of the injectivity . the following argument is given in @xcite by modifying the argument by n. ivanov in @xcite . indeed , since , any element @xmath935 fixes any point of @xmath342 , by applying the argument of the proof of theorem a in @xcite , we can find a fixed point @xmath936 of @xmath35 . since almost all geodesic rays emanating @xmath937 land at a point in @xmath356 , we can see that @xmath35 is the identity mapping on @xmath55 ( cf . @xcite ) . since @xmath931 is surjective unless @xmath54 is a torus with two holes , so is @xmath934 ( cf . luo @xcite ) . suppose that @xmath54 is a torus with two holes . we consider the quotient map @xmath938 defined by the action of the hyper - elliptic involution on @xmath54 . the quotient map induces the isomorphism from @xmath58 to @xmath939 and an isometry from @xmath940 to @xmath941 ( cf . @xcite and @xcite ) . the reason why is not surjective when @xmath54 is a torus with two holes is that there is no homeomorphism on @xmath54 which sends a non - null - homologous curve to a null - homologous curve , while each curve on @xmath942 is null - homologous . thus , in any case , the homomorphism @xmath934 is surjective . recall that any isometry is an invertible asymptotically conservative mapping . hence , we have a monoid monomorphism @xmath943 our rigidity theorem is given as follows . [ thm : induced_automorphism ] suppose that @xmath54 is neither a torus with one hole nor a sphere with four holes . then , there is a monoid epimorphism @xmath944 with the following properties : * if @xmath945 is an asymptotic quasi - inverse of @xmath946 , @xmath947 ; * @xmath948 as monoid homomorphism . in addition , @xmath949 induces a group isomorphism @xmath950 which satisfies the following commutative diagram : @xmath61^{\mathcal{i}_0 } & { \rm isom}({\mathcal{t } } ) \ar[r]^{\mathcal{i } } \ar[dr]^{\mbox{{\tiny group iso } } } & { { \rm ac_{inv}}}({\mathcal{t } } ) \ar[d]^{\mbox{{\tiny proj } } } \ar[dr]^{\xi } & \\ & & { \mathfrak{ac}}({\mathcal{t } } ) \ar[r]^{\mbox{{\tiny group iso } } } & { \rm aut}(\mathbb{x}(s ) ) . & } \ ] ] we may assume that @xmath54 is not a torus with two holes . indeed , when @xmath54 is a torus with two holes , the quotient map @xmath938 by the hyper - elliptic action induces an isometry between the teichmller spaces of @xmath54 and @xmath942 and an isomorphism between @xmath951 and @xmath952 , where @xmath942 is a sphere with five holes ( cf . @xcite and @xcite ) . hence , we consider @xmath942 instead of @xmath54 in this case . let @xmath953 be the @xmath381-skeleton of @xmath58 . for @xmath954 , we identify the projective class @xmath516 $ ] with a point in the @xmath449 . let @xmath946 . from lemma [ lem : height_boundary_points ] , there is an adherence tower @xmath913}\}_{i=1}^{{{\rm cx}}(s)}$ ] with @xmath888}={[[\alpha]]}$ ] . from lemma [ lem : equivalent_1 ] , @xmath955})\}_{i=1}^{{{\rm cx}}(s)}$ ] is also an adherence tower starting @xmath956 } ) = { \partial_\infty(\omega)}({[[\alpha]]})$ ] . therefore , @xmath957})={[[\beta]]}\ ] ] for some simple closed curve @xmath958 , by lemma [ lem : height_boundary_points ] again . hence , @xmath35 induces a self - mapping @xmath959 of @xmath953 . namely , @xmath959 satisfies @xmath960})={[[h_\omega(\alpha)]]}\ ] ] for all @xmath961 . since @xmath35 admits an asymptotic quasi - inverse @xmath50 , by lemma [ lem : quasi - inverse ] , the self - mappings @xmath959 and @xmath962 satisfy @xmath963 on @xmath953 this means that @xmath959 is bijective . let @xmath964 with @xmath965 . then , @xmath966 and @xmath967 . therefore , @xmath968},{[[g]]}\}$ ] and @xmath969},{[[g]]}\}$ ] are adherence towers . from lemma [ lem : equivalent_1 ] , @xmath970}),{\partial_\infty(\omega)}({[[g]]})\}$ ] and @xmath971}),{\partial_\infty(\omega)}({[[g]]})\}$ ] are also adherence towers . since @xmath959 is bijective and @xmath972})={[[h_\omega(\alpha)]]}$ ] and @xmath973})={[[h_\omega(\beta)]]}$ ] , we have @xmath974 . this means that @xmath975 . from lemma [ lem : composition ] , the mapping @xmath976 is a monoid homomorphism . the condition ( 1 ) in the statement follows from the above argument . we next check the condition ( 2 ) in the statement . let @xmath977 . then , @xmath35 preserves @xmath342 in @xmath978 ( cf . 9 in @xcite ) . from the definition of @xmath959 , for any @xmath346 , @xmath979 coincides with @xmath980 . this means that @xmath981 . we check is an epimorphism . we will prove the injectivity of the homomorphism in the next section . let @xmath982 . suppose that @xmath41 and @xmath42 are close at infinity . this means that for any sequences @xmath8 and @xmath9 in @xmath55 , if @xmath45 , @xmath983 . suppose that for @xmath128 , @xmath984 and @xmath985 for @xmath986 as @xmath537 . from proposition [ prop : accumulation_point_accompany ] , @xmath45 if and only if @xmath888}={[[p_2]]}$ ] . hence , the condition closeness at infinity " implies that @xmath987 on @xmath859 . therefore , by the definition , we have @xmath988 . from lemmas [ lem : composition ] and [ lem : quasi - inverse ] , @xmath949 descends to a homomorphism @xmath989\mapsto \xi(\omega)=h_\omega\in { \rm aut}({\mathbb{x}}(s)).\ ] ] since @xmath54 is not a torus with two holes , @xmath931 is an epimorphism , and so is @xmath949 . the injectivity of ( or ) is proven in the next section . in this section , we shall show that the epimorphism is an isomorphism . we first check the following . [ lem : rigidity_1 ] for @xmath946 , let @xmath975 as theorem [ thm : induced_automorphism ] . 1 . for @xmath346 . consider the projective class @xmath516 $ ] as a point in @xmath449 . then , @xmath990)=\{[h_\omega(\alpha)]\}$ ] ; 2 . if @xmath516\in \mathcal{n}^\psi(p)$ ] , then @xmath991\in \mathcal{n}^\psi(q)$ ] for all @xmath853 . conversely , if @xmath991\in \mathcal{n}^\psi(q)$ ] for some @xmath853 , @xmath516\in \mathcal{n}^\psi(p)$ ] . ( 1)let @xmath36 be a sequence in @xmath55 converging to @xmath516 $ ] in @xmath447 . let @xmath783 be an accumulation point of @xmath110 . we may assume that @xmath992 converges to @xmath273 in @xmath447 . by and , any accumulation point @xmath783 of a sequence @xmath110 satisfies @xmath993)$ ] from lemma [ lem : equivalent_1 ] . namely , @xmath994 for all @xmath995 . by applying theorem 3 in @xcite , we conclude that @xmath996 $ ] in @xmath449 . this means that @xmath110 converges to @xmath991 $ ] in @xmath447 . ( 2)@xmath516\in \mathcal{n}^\psi(p)$ ] if and only if @xmath997 . since @xmath35 is asymptotically conservative , from ( 1 ) above , @xmath998 for any @xmath853 . the converse is also proven by the same argument . [ prop : rigidity_2 ] suppose that @xmath54 is not a torus with two holes . for @xmath946 , there is a homeomorphism @xmath999 of @xmath54 with the following property : for any @xmath1000 , @xmath435\in \mathcal{af}(\psi_{gm}(p))$ ] and @xmath853 , we have @xmath1001)$ ] . from the assumption and theorem [ thm : induced_automorphism ] , there is a homeomorphism @xmath999 of @xmath54 such that @xmath1002 . from theorem [ thm : associated_foliations_and_null_sets ] , if we take @xmath674\in \mathcal{af}(\psi_{gm}(q))$ ] , then @xmath1003).\ ] ] from ( 2 ) in proposition [ lem : rigidity_1 ] , for any @xmath346 , @xmath388 if and only if @xmath1004=[h_\omega(\alpha)]\in \mathcal{n}^\psi(q)$ ] . hence , we deduce that @xmath1005)\cap \mathcal{s}= \mathcal{n}^\psi(q)\cap \mathcal{s}=\mathcal{n}^\psi([f_\omega(g)])\cap \mathcal{s}\ ] ] where @xmath342 stands for a subset of @xmath449 in . therefore , the support of @xmath375 coincides with the support of @xmath1006 . in particular , any essential curve of @xmath378 is also that of @xmath1007 , and vice versa . as , we decompose @xmath187 as @xmath1008 let @xmath366 be the support of an arational component @xmath365 of @xmath187 . it is known that @xmath447 is metrizable ( cf . theorem 1.2 in @xcite ) . henceforth , we fix a distance @xmath1009 on @xmath447 . fix @xmath1010 . take a sequence @xmath1011 such that @xmath1012 and @xmath1013,[g_i])<1/n.\ ] ] since @xmath999 is a homeomorphism , @xmath1014 $ ] tends to @xmath1015 $ ] in @xmath356 ( and hence in @xmath447 ) as @xmath537 . by taking a subsequence , we may assume that @xmath1016,[f_\omega(g_i)])<1/n\ ] ] for all @xmath702 . let @xmath1017 be a sequence in @xmath55 converging to @xmath1018 $ ] in @xmath447 . since @xmath198 , by ( 1 ) of proposition [ lem : rigidity_1 ] , @xmath1019 converges to @xmath1014 $ ] in @xmath447 for all @xmath709 . by applying the diagonal argument and taking a subsequence if necessary , we can take @xmath1020 such that if we put @xmath1021 and @xmath217 , then @xmath1022 ) , d_\infty(\omega(z_n),[f_\omega(\alpha_n)])\}<2/n\ ] ] in @xmath447 . since @xmath999 is a homeomorphism of @xmath54 , @xmath1014 $ ] tends to @xmath1015 $ ] in @xmath356 and hence in @xmath447 . from , we have @xmath1023 ) ) \le d_\infty(\omega(z_n),f_\omega([\alpha_n ] ) ) + d_\infty(f_\omega([\alpha_n]),[f_\omega(g_i ) ] ) \to 0\ ] ] as @xmath537 . therefore @xmath262 converges to @xmath1015 $ ] . this means that @xmath1015\in \mathcal{a}(\omega\colon [ g_i])$ ] . since @xmath365 is an arational component of @xmath187 , @xmath1024)\subset \mathcal{n}^\psi([g_0])$ ] . therefore , by lemma [ lem : equivalent_1 ] , we conclude @xmath1025)= \mathcal{n}^\psi(q)\subset \mathcal{n}^\psi([f_\omega(g_i)])\ ] ] since @xmath853 and @xmath1015\in \mathcal{a}(\omega\colon [ g_i])$ ] . therefore , @xmath378 contains an arational component @xmath380 which is topologically equivalent to @xmath1026 . since the support of @xmath375 coincides with that of @xmath371 , the arational components of @xmath378 are contained in @xmath1027 . hence , the normal form of @xmath378 should be @xmath1028 where @xmath1029 and @xmath1030 . thus , @xmath375 is topologically equivalent to @xmath1006 . hence by corollary [ coro : topological_equivalence_null_set ] , we deduce @xmath1031)= \mathcal{n}^\psi([h])=\mathcal{n}^\psi(q),\ ] ] which is what we desired . [ prop : rigidity_3 ] for any @xmath946 , there is a unique isometry @xmath1032 on @xmath55 which is close to @xmath35 at infinity . we first suppose that @xmath54 is not a torus with two holes . take @xmath999 as in proposition [ prop : rigidity_2 ] . since @xmath999 is a homeomorphism of @xmath54 , @xmath999 induces an isometry @xmath1032 on @xmath55 . when @xmath54 is a closed surface of genus @xmath71 , there is an ambiguity of the choice of @xmath999 which is caused by the hyperelliptic involution . however , the isometry @xmath1032 is independent of the choice . let @xmath8 and @xmath1033 be convergent sequences at infinity satisfying that @xmath45 . from proposition [ prop : null_sets_and_accompany ] , there are @xmath187 , @xmath1034 , @xmath1035 such that @xmath1036 ) & = { \mathcal{acm}}({\bf x}^1)={\mathcal{acm}}({\bf x}^2)\\ \mathcal{n}^\psi([h_1 ] ) & = { \mathcal{acm}}(\omega({\bf x}^1 ) ) \\ \mathcal{n}^\psi([h_2 ] ) & = { \mathcal{acm}}(\xi_\omega({\bf x}^2)).\end{aligned}\ ] ] ( cf . ) . hence , our assertion follows from proposition [ prop : accumulation_points_and_accompany ] and the following claim : [ claim : gh_1h_2 ] it holds @xmath1037)=\mathcal{n}^\psi([f_\omega(g)])= \mathcal{n}^\psi([h_2]).\ ] ] let @xmath1038 and @xmath1039 . let @xmath1040 and fix @xmath801\in \mathcal{af}(\psi_{gm}(p))$ ] . from proposition [ prop : rigidity_2 ] , @xmath1041)=0 $ ] . since @xmath249 is taken arbitrarily in @xmath1042 , from the proof of proposition [ prop : null_sets_and_accompany ] , we have @xmath1043)=0 $ ] . hence @xmath1037 ) \subset \mathcal{n}^\psi([f_\omega(g)]).\ ] ] let @xmath1044)$ ] . for @xmath1045 , we take a subsequence @xmath93 of @xmath43 such that @xmath262 converges to @xmath273 . we may assume that @xmath93 converges to @xmath1046 . fix @xmath801\in \mathcal{af}(\psi_{gm}(p))$ ] . from proposition [ prop : rigidity_2 ] , we have @xmath1047)$ ] . from the construction of @xmath187 , @xmath807 is topologically equivalent to a subfoliation of @xmath187 . hence , @xmath1048)=\mathcal{n}^\psi(q)$ ] . since @xmath273 is taken arbitrarily from @xmath1045 , we can deduce that any sequence converging to @xmath881 is visually indistinguishable from @xmath104 ( cf . remark [ remark : accompanying_sequence ] ) . therefore , @xmath1049)$ ] and @xmath1050)=\mathcal{n}^\psi([f_\omega(g)]).\ ] ] since @xmath1032 is an isometry , @xmath1051 since @xmath1032 extends to @xmath447 homeomorphically and coincides with the action of @xmath999 on @xmath458 , we have @xmath1052)\cap \mathcal{pmf } & = { \mathcal{acm}}(\xi_\omega({\bf x}^2))\cap \mathcal{pmf } = \xi_\omega({\mathcal{acm}}({\bf x}^2))\cap \mathcal{pmf } \\ & = \xi_\omega(\mathcal{n}^\psi([g]))\cap \mathcal{pmf } = \mathcal{n}^\psi([f_\omega(g)])\cap \mathcal{pmf}.\end{aligned}\ ] ] this equality means that @xmath1053 . by corollary [ coro : topological_equivalence_null_set ] , we have @xmath1054 and @xmath1055)=\mathcal{n}^\psi([f_\omega(g)])$ ] . the case where @xmath54 is a torus with two holes follows from the fact that the teichmller space of @xmath54 is isometric to the teichmller space of a sphere with five holes . let @xmath790 with @xmath1056 . from proposition [ prop : rigidity_3 ] , there is an isometry @xmath1032 which is close to @xmath35 . since @xmath1057 , @xmath1032 is the identity mapping on @xmath55 , and hence @xmath35 is close to the identity . in this section , we consider the actions of rough homotheties on teichmller space . indeed , we shall prove theorem [ thm : teichmullerspace_homothety ] . as given in [ subsec : results ] , we recall a mapping @xmath1058 a @xmath63-_rough homothety _ if @xmath1059 for all @xmath1060 . suppose first that @xmath509 . we may assume that @xmath54 is not a torus with two holes . suppose to the contrary that there is a @xmath63-rough homothety @xmath35 with asymptotic quasi - inverse for some @xmath70 . notice from remark ( 2 ) in [ subsec : remarks_asymptotically_conservative ] that @xmath946 . take a homeomorphism @xmath999 on @xmath54 as proposition [ prop : rigidity_2 ] . let @xmath1061 . consider the projective classes @xmath516 $ ] and @xmath517 $ ] as points in @xmath449 . then , from , lemma [ lem : rigidity_1 ] and proposition [ prop : rigidity_2 ] , we have @xmath1062,[\beta])^{k } \le i_{x_0}([f_\omega(\alpha)],[f_\omega(\beta ) ] ) \le e^{d_0}i_{x_0}([\alpha],[\beta])^{k}\ ] ] where @xmath221 is a constant depending only on @xmath1063 and @xmath1064 . on the other hand , let @xmath1065 , where @xmath1032 is an isometry associated to @xmath35 taken as proposition [ prop : rigidity_3 ] . from the definition , @xmath1066 for @xmath358 . by the quasiconformal invariance of extremal length , we obtain @xmath1067,[\beta ] ) \le i_{x_0}([f_\omega(\alpha)],[f_\omega(\beta ) ] ) \le k_0 i_{x_0}([\alpha],[\beta ] ) \ ] ] since @xmath999 is a homeomorphism on @xmath54 and @xmath1068 . therefore , we deduce @xmath1069,[\beta])^{1-k } & \le k_0e^{d_0 } \label{eq : k - homothety_4 } \\ i_{x_0}([\alpha],[\beta])^{k-1 } & \le k_0e^{d_0 } \label{eq : k - homothety_4_2}\end{aligned}\ ] ] for any @xmath1061 with @xmath1070,[\beta])\ne 0 $ ] . since the left - hand sides of and are projectively invariant , when the projective classes @xmath516,[\beta]$ ] tend together to some projective measured foliation @xmath435\in \mathcal{pmf}$ ] with keeping satisfying @xmath1071 , the left - hand side in diverges if @xmath1072 , otherwise the left - hand side in diverges . in any case , we get a contradiction . suppose @xmath1073 . in this case , there exists an isometry @xmath1074 sending @xmath0 to the origin @xmath381 . furthermore , the gromov product @xmath1075 for @xmath1076 satisfies @xmath1077 , where @xmath1078 $ ] is the geodesic connecting between @xmath28 and @xmath29 ( cf . 2.33 in @xcite ) . suppose on the contrary that there is a @xmath63-rough homothety @xmath35 with @xmath70 . notice from theorem [ thm : acgroup_hyperbolic_group_boundary_continuous ] that @xmath35 extends to a self - homeomorphism on @xmath1079 . we may assume that @xmath1080 . from , for @xmath1076 , @xmath1081)-kd_{\mathbb{d}}(0,[x_1,x_2])|\le d_2\ ] ] for some constant @xmath1082 . therefore , for any @xmath1083 , we have @xmath1084 with positive constants @xmath1085 . since the lift of a self - homeomorphism on @xmath1079 to @xmath1086 is a monotone function , the extension of @xmath35 to @xmath1079 is differentiable almost everywhere on @xmath1079 . however , since the extension of @xmath35 satisfies , either @xmath35 or @xmath1087 is not differentiable any point on @xmath1079 if @xmath70 . this is a contradiction . the main result of this section is lemma [ lem : fills_curves ] . the estimates in the lemma looks similar to that in theorem 6.1 of @xcite . however , our advantage here is that we treat the extremal lengths of all non - trivial ( possibly peripheral ) curves of subsurfaces and give a constant @xmath1088 concretely ( cf . and ) . let @xmath1089 be a holomorphic quadratic differential on @xmath4 . the differential @xmath1090 defines a measured foliation on @xmath4 . we say that such a measured foliation the _ vertical foliation _ of @xmath1089 . the vertical foliation of @xmath1091 is called the _ horizontal foliation _ of @xmath1089 . by a _ step curve _ , we mean a geodesic polygon in @xmath4 the sides of which are horizontal and vertical arcs of @xmath1089 ( cf . figure [ fig : stepcurve ] ) . [ prop_strebel_stepcurve ] let @xmath1089 be a quadratic differential and @xmath400 the vertical foliation of @xmath1089 . let @xmath1092 be a simple closed step curve with the additional property that for any vertical side @xmath1093 of @xmath1092 the two neighboring horizontal sides @xmath1094 and @xmath1095 are on different sides of @xmath1093 ( there are no zeros of @xmath1089 on @xmath1092 ) . then , @xmath1096 where @xmath385 is the homotopy class containing @xmath1092 . it can be also observed that a step curve with the property stated in theorem [ prop_strebel_stepcurve ] is quasi - transversal . for instance , see the proof of proposition ii.6 or the curve ( 4 ) of figure 10 of expos 5 in @xcite . let @xmath668 be an essential subsurface of @xmath4 . denote by @xmath1097 a subset of @xmath342 consisting of curves which are non - peripheral in @xmath668 . let @xmath1098 be a subset of @xmath342 consisting of curves which can be deformed into @xmath668 . [ lem : fills_curves ] let @xmath668 be a connected , compact and essential subsurface of @xmath4 with negative euler characteristic . let @xmath1099 be a system of curves which fills up @xmath668 . then , for @xmath1100 , we have @xmath1101 where @xmath1102 and @xmath1103 depends only on the topological type @xmath1104 of @xmath4 and the number @xmath890 of the system @xmath1105 . in particular , we have @xmath1106 for all @xmath1107 . suppose first that @xmath385 is represented by a component of @xmath1108 . when @xmath385 is homotopic to a puncture of @xmath4 , @xmath1109 since @xmath4 contains an arbitrary wide annulus whose core is homotopic to @xmath385 . hence we have nothing to do ( in fact , we can set @xmath1110 ) . suppose that @xmath385 is not peripheral in @xmath4 . let @xmath1111 be a jenkins - strebel differential for @xmath385 on @xmath4 . let @xmath1112 be the characteristic annulus of @xmath1111 . we consider a compactification " @xmath1113 by attaching two copies of circles as its boundaries . the induced flat structure on @xmath1112 from @xmath1111 canonically extends to the compactification @xmath1113 and components of the boundary @xmath1114 are closed regular trajectories under this flat structure . there is a canonical surjection @xmath1115 ( the completion of @xmath4 at the punctures ) . namely , @xmath1116 is reconstructed by identifying disjoint vertical straight arcs in @xmath1114 along vertical saddle connections of @xmath1111 . ( in this sense , @xmath1117 is a quotient map ) . without any confusion , we may recognize the characteristic annulus @xmath1112 itself as a subset of @xmath4 . let @xmath1118 and @xmath1119 be the core trajectory in @xmath1112 and the geodesic representative of @xmath495 with respect to @xmath1111 respectively . since @xmath385 is parallel to @xmath1108 , by taking an isotopy , we may assume that @xmath1118 is a component of @xmath1108 . furthermore , since @xmath1120 , @xmath385 does not intersect any @xmath495 for all @xmath370 . hence , each @xmath1119 consists of vertical saddle connections . in other words , @xmath1119 is contained in the critical graph @xmath1121 of @xmath1111 in @xmath4 , which consists of vertical saddle connections of @xmath1111 . suppose @xmath1129 for some @xmath370 and @xmath1127 contains a vertical saddle connection @xmath1130 such that @xmath1131 for all @xmath370 . then , @xmath1130 intersects all @xmath1132 at most at endpoints ( critical points of @xmath1111 ) . let @xmath1133 . let @xmath1134 be a horizontal arc in @xmath1112 starting at @xmath1135 and terminating at a point of @xmath1136 . since the both side of @xmath1130 is in @xmath1112 , after @xmath1134 passes through @xmath1130 , @xmath1134 terminates at a point @xmath1137 . let @xmath1138 be a segment of @xmath1118 connecting @xmath1139 and @xmath782 ( cf . figure [ fig : a_gamma ] ) . set @xmath1140 . by definition , @xmath636 does not intersects any @xmath1119 and hence @xmath1141 for all @xmath370 . suppose first that @xmath1134 arrived @xmath782 from the different side from that where @xmath1134 departed at @xmath1139 ( cf . ( 1 ) of figure [ fig : a_gamma ] ) . then , we have @xmath1142 since the width of @xmath1112 is one and @xmath636 is a step curve with the property stated in proposition [ prop_strebel_stepcurve ] . hence @xmath636 is non - trivial and non - peripheral simple closed curve in @xmath4 . however , this contradicts that @xmath1105 fills up @xmath668 , since such a @xmath1143 contains homotopically non - trivial arc connecting @xmath1108 because @xmath385 is parallel to a component of @xmath1108 . suppose @xmath1134 arrived at @xmath782 from the same side as that where @xmath1134 departed ( cf . ( 2 ) of figure [ fig : a_gamma ] ) . we may also assume that @xmath1134 departs from @xmath1139 into @xmath668 . indeed , suppose we can not assume so . then , the component of @xmath1144 that lies on the same side as that of @xmath668 ( near @xmath1118 ) is covered by @xmath1145 , which contradicts what we assumed first . then , there is an open rectangle @xmath1146 in @xmath1112 such that @xmath636 and a segment in @xmath1122 surround @xmath1146 in @xmath1112 . from the assumption , we may assume that the closure of @xmath1147 , say @xmath23 , intersects some @xmath1119 . suppose that @xmath636 is trivial . then , @xmath23 is a disk in @xmath4 surrounded by @xmath636 , since @xmath1118 can be homotopic to the outside of @xmath23 . this means that @xmath1119 is contained in a disk @xmath23 because @xmath1119 does not intersect @xmath636 , which is a contradiction . by the same argument , we can see that @xmath636 is non - peripheral ( otherwise , @xmath1119 were peripheral ) . since @xmath1134 departs into @xmath668 at @xmath1139 and returns to @xmath1118 on the side where @xmath668 lies , after taking an isotopy if necessary , we can see that @xmath1134 contains a subsegment which is nontrivial in @xmath668 and connecting @xmath1108 , which contradicts again that @xmath1105 fills @xmath668 up . let us continue to prove lemma [ lem : fills_curves ] for peripheral @xmath1148 . we take @xmath1127 as in claim 1 . since both sides of every vertical saddle connection face @xmath1112 , @xmath1127 visits each vertical saddle connection at most twice . notice that the number of vertical saddle connections is at most @xmath1149 . since each vertical saddle connection in @xmath1127 is contained in some @xmath1119 , we have @xmath1150 since @xmath1119 is the geodesic representative of @xmath495 . since the width of @xmath1112 is one , from , we conclude @xmath1151 we next assume that @xmath385 is not parallel to any component of @xmath1108 . let @xmath1153 be components of @xmath1108 each of which is non - peripheral in @xmath4 . let @xmath566 and set @xmath1154 ( cf . it is possible that two curves @xmath1155 and @xmath1156 are homotopic in @xmath4 . in this case , we recognize @xmath1157 in . however , for the simplicity of the discussion , we shall assume that any two of @xmath1158 are not isotopic . the general case can be treated in a similar way . let @xmath1159 be the holomorphic quadratic differential on @xmath4 whose vertical foliation is @xmath1160 . since @xmath1161 in @xmath351 , @xmath1159 tends to @xmath1111 in @xmath1162 ( cf . see also theorem 21.3 in @xcite ) . let @xmath1163 and @xmath1164 denote the characteristic annuli of @xmath1159 for @xmath385 and @xmath393 , respectively . set @xmath1165 and @xmath1166 to be closed trajectories in homotopic to @xmath385 and @xmath393 , respectively . let @xmath1167 be the closure of the component of @xmath1168-neighborhood of the cores @xmath1166 , containing @xmath1163 . by definition , we may identify @xmath1167 with @xmath668 . let @xmath1169 be the geodesic representation of @xmath495 with respect to @xmath1159 . we fix an orientation on @xmath1165 . let @xmath220 be a component of @xmath1170 . let @xmath1171 be the set of points @xmath1172 such that the horizontal ray @xmath1173 departing at @xmath249 from the right of @xmath220 terminates at a curve in @xmath1174 before intersecting @xmath220 twice . let @xmath1175 be the set of @xmath1172 such that @xmath1173 terminates at a critical point of @xmath1159 . then , we claim let @xmath1178 . suppose @xmath1179 . since the completion @xmath1116 with respect to the punctures is closed , @xmath1173 is recurrent ( cf . 10 of chapter iv in @xcite ) . by the definition of @xmath1171 and @xmath1180 , @xmath1173 intersects @xmath220 at least twice before intersecting curves in @xmath1174 . hence , @xmath1173 contains a consecutive horizontal segments @xmath1134 and @xmath1181 such that each @xmath1182 intersects @xmath220 only at its endpoints , and does not intersect any curves in @xmath1174 . when one of the segments , say @xmath1134 , connects both sides of @xmath220 , @xmath220 contains a vertical segment @xmath1183 connecting endpoints of @xmath1182 , and two trajectories @xmath1134 and @xmath1183 make a closed curve @xmath242 on @xmath4 . since the two ends of @xmath1182 terminate at @xmath220 from different sides , the intersection number satisfies @xmath1184 and is greater than or equal to the width of @xmath1163 , by proposition [ prop_strebel_stepcurve ] . therefore @xmath242 is non - trivial and non - peripheral in @xmath4 . since @xmath1182 does not intersect @xmath1166 , @xmath242 is contained in @xmath1167 , where we have identified with @xmath668 . furthermore , @xmath242 is not peripheral in @xmath668 because @xmath242 has non - trivial intersection with @xmath385 . by definition , @xmath242 does not intersect all @xmath495 , which is a contradiction because @xmath1105 fills @xmath668 up . we assume that two ends of each @xmath1182 terminate at @xmath220 from the same side . in this case , we can also construct a simple closed step curve @xmath242 with the property stated in proposition [ prop_strebel_stepcurve ] from @xmath1134 , @xmath1181 and a subsegment of @xmath220 ( cf . figure [ fig : delta ] ) . : there are two cases . in the case ( 1 ) , the initial point of @xmath1134 and the terminal point of @xmath1181 are separated by the terminal point of @xmath1134 . the case ( 2 ) describes the other case.,height=188 ] this is a contradiction as above . thus we conclude that @xmath1176 . we show that @xmath1177 is open in @xmath220 . let @xmath1185 such that the horizontal ray @xmath1173 defined above does not terminate at critical points of @xmath1159 . by definition , the horizontal ray @xmath1173 terminate the interior of a straight arc contained in either @xmath1186 or @xmath1187 . hence , when @xmath1188 is in some small neighborhood of @xmath249 , @xmath1189 also terminates at such a straight arc , and hence @xmath1190 for all point @xmath873 in a small neighborhood of @xmath249 . let us return to the proof of case 2 of the lemma . let @xmath220 be a component of @xmath1191 . by definition , for @xmath1192 , @xmath1173 terminates at @xmath220 at most once before intersecting curves in @xmath1193 . since any horizontal ray @xmath1173 with @xmath1179 can terminate at a curve in @xmath1174 from at most two sides . hence for almost all point @xmath273 in a curve in @xmath1174 , there are at most @xmath1194 points in @xmath1171 such that the horizontal rays emanating there land at @xmath273 . from claim 2 , we get @xmath1195 where @xmath1196 means linear measure . since @xmath1186 is the geodesic representative of @xmath495 , the number of components of @xmath1170 is @xmath1197 therefore , we obtain @xmath1198 since @xmath1159 tends to @xmath1111 as @xmath1199 , for all @xmath1200 we find an @xmath566 such that @xmath1201 by corollary 21.2 in @xcite and the cauchy - schwarz inequality , where @xmath1202 from . notice that the number @xmath1203 of components of @xmath1108 satisfies @xmath1204 . indeed , we fix a hyperbolic metric on @xmath4 and realize @xmath668 as a convex hyperbolic subsurface of @xmath4 . let @xmath1205 and @xmath1206 be the genus and the number of punctures in @xmath668 . since @xmath1207 and @xmath668 is essential , by comparing to the hyperbolic area , we have @xmath1208 and hence @xmath1204 . j. alonso , t. brady , d. cooper , v. ferlini , m. lustig , m. mihalik , m. shapiro , h. short , notes on word hyperbolic groups , _ group theory from a geometrical viewpoint _ ( trieste , 1990 ) , 363 , world sci . publ . , river edge , nj , ( 1991 ) . a. douady , a. fathi , d. fried , f. laudenbach , v. ponaru , and m. shub , _ travaux de thurston sur les surfaces _ , sminaire orsay ( seconde dition ) . astrisque no . 66 - 67 , socit mathmatique de france , paris ( 1991 ) . n. ivanov , isometries of teichmller spaces from the point of view of mostow rigidity , _ topology , ergodic theory , real algebraic geometry _ ( eds . turaev , v. , vershik , a. ) , 131149 , amer . 2 , vol * 202 * , american mathematical society ( 2001 ) . Abstract:

Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.

Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered . Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video . Paper: a wide range of soft materials exhibit slow relaxations strongly reminiscent of the glassy dynamics observed in hard condensed matter . these materials include concentrated or strongly interacting colloidal suspensions , emulsions , surfactant systems , polymeric or colloidal gels , and foams @xcite . most of these materials are out of thermodynamical equilibrium : for systems far from equilibrium , a continuous evolution of the mechanical and dynamical properties is observed , in analogy with the slowing down of the dynamics in aging hard glasses . several different terms are used in the literature to designate out - of - equilibrium soft materials , depending on the context and the authors views : gels , glasses , and jammed @xcite systems are but a few examples . here , we will term them quite generally `` soft glassy systems '' @xcite or simply soft glasses . soft glasses are non - ergodic systems , since they are able to explore only a restricted portion of the total phase space . experimentally , however , determining whether or not a given system is non - ergodic may prove to be a difficult task , since only a limited range of length and time scales can be probed . in the following we will therefore use the term `` soft glassy system '' with a wider connotation , including also materials that are ergodic but still exhibit very slow relaxations . soft glassy systems attract a wide interest . on the one hand , they are ubiquitous in industrial applications , for example in the food , cosmetic , paint , pharmaceutical , and oil recovery industry . for most applications , understanding and controlling their dynamical and rheological properties , as well as their long term evolution and stability is of fundamental importance . on the other hand , soft glasses are much studied at a more fundamental level . for example , systems such as colloidal hard spheres are taken as model systems for investigating the general behavior of glasses , their relevant time and length scales being more easily accessible than in molecular glasses . moreover , soft systems allow one to control in great detail and to significantly vary the interactions between their constituents . therefore , it is possible to investigate how different interactions influence the dynamical behavior of soft glassy materials and the generality of the behavior observed for model systems can be tested . until very recently , the experimental characterization of the dynamics was limited to relatively short time scales ( e.g. up to a few hundred seconds in light scattering experiments ) and only the average dynamics were accessible . theoretically , very few quantitative models were available , and their applicability was restricted to a few model systems ( e.g. the mode coupling theory , mct @xcite , applied to colloidal suspensions interacting via a hard sphere potential ) . recent advances include progress both on the conceptual and experimental side . the concept of jamming @xcite was proposed to describe in a unified way albeit somehow qualitatively the ergodic to non - ergodic transition in many systems , including molecular glasses , granular materials , and colloids . on the other hand , the mct has been extended to include concentrated systems with attractive interactions ( for a review see reference @xcite ) and attempts have been made to extend its validity to more diluted attractive systems @xcite , thus bridging the gap between colloidal gels and glasses . thus , both the jamming picture and the mct attempt to give a unified vision of the ergodic to non - ergodic transition , the scope of the former being wider and the latter providing more quantitative predictions . finally , dynamical heterogeneity has emerged as a key feature of the slow dynamics of glassy systems @xcite and many theories have been developed based on or incorporating dynamical heterogeneity . on the experimental side , recent advances include both the design of new systems with interactions that can be fine - tuned and the development of new methods and techniques to measure very slow and heterogeneous relaxations in out - of - equilibrium systems . experimentally , controlling the transition to non - ergodicity ( possibly in a reversible way ) is often quite difficult . as a consequence , systems for which a transition from a fluid to a solid state can be reversibly obtained are particularly interesting . they include thermoresponsive systems such as thermoreversible sticky hard spheres @xcite or emulsions @xcite , swellable microgel particles @xcite , star polymers @xcite , and surfactant systems @xcite . the most popular techniques for probing the dynamics of soft systems are probably optical microscopy and dynamic light scattering : both of them have benefited of major improvements in the last years . time - resolved confocal microscopy , together with digital image processing , allows the trajectories of thousands of fluorescently dyed particles to be measured simultaneously @xcite , thus providing detailed information on the dynamics at a microscopic level . motion on very long time scales ( up to several days ) has been measured by bleaching a cubic volume of the sample and by measuring the fluorescence recovery due to the diffusion of the unbleached particles @xcite . in light scattering experiments , information on the sample dynamics are obtained by measuring the time autocorrelation function of the scattered intensity , @xmath0 . in the single scattering regime @xcite , the dynamic structure factor ( or intermediate scattering function ) @xmath1 is proportional to @xmath2 , where the intensity autocorrelation function is measured at a scattering vector @xmath3 and the proportionality factor depends on the setup detection . the advent of high brilliance coherent x - ray sources has made possible x - photon correlation spectroscopy ( xpcs ) @xcite , which extends dynamic light scattering experiments to much higher values of @xmath4 . for highly multiply scattering samples , the diffusing wave spectroscopy ( dws ) @xcite formalism allows the particle mean squared displacement to be extracted from @xmath0 , provided that the dynamics be homogeneous . until recently , the applicability of light scattering and xpcs techniques to soft glasses has been severely limited by the need to average the measured intensity autocorrelation function over a duration much longer than the system relaxation time . this limitation has been overcame by the so - called multispeckle technique @xcite , where a multielement detector is used ( typically a ccd camera ) and the intensity autocorrelation function is averaged not only over time , but also over distinct speckles corresponding to different elements of the detector . this scheme allows one to drastically reduce the duration of a measurement , thus making dynamic scattering techniques suitable for systems with very slow or non - stationary dynamics . a conceptually similar approach is followed in the so - called interleaved method , where a point detector is used and the sample is slowly rotated in order to illuminate sequentially the detector with different speckles @xcite ; for each speckle the intensity correlation function is calculated for time delays multiple of the period of rotation of the sample and @xmath5 is finally obtained by averaging over all speckles . a recent implementation of this scheme , more simple and efficient , is described in reference @xcite . to conclude this brief overview of recent advances in scattering methods , we remark that most scattering experiments probe the average dynamics and hence are not sensitive to dynamic heterogeneities . information on temporal heterogeneity of the dynamics can be extracted from higher order correlation functions @xcite or using the time resolved correlation ( trc ) method @xcite , as it will be discussed in some detail in section [ sec : hetero ] . in this paper we will review the experimental work of the last few years on soft glassy systems , with an emphasis on microscopy , light scattering and , to a less extent , rheology experiments . references will be made also to some of the numerical and theoretical investigations related to experiments , as well as to experiments on granular materials that share intriguing analogies with soft glasses . the literature is very abundant , reflecting the growing interest in this field . we have chosen to focus on four areas that seem to us particularly interesting and promising . deals with the observation of two types of colloidal glasses ( repulsive and attractive ) , and the success of the mct in modelling the slow dynamics of these systems . systems very far from equilibrium , where stress relaxation appears to play a major role in the slow dynamics are reviewed in section [ sec : outofequilibrium ] . section [ sec : perturb ] discusses the effect of a perturbation on a glassy system , both in the linear and in the non - linear regime . finally , dynamical heterogeneities in the slow dynamics are addressed in section [ sec : hetero ] . hard spheres have been investigated as a model system for the glass transition for many years . experimentally , colloidal particles such as poly(methyl methacrylate ) ( pmma ) spheres sterically stabilized and suspended in an organic solvent have been shown to behave as hard spheres , forming a glass phase when the volume fraction , @xmath6 , becomes larger than @xmath7 @xcite . on the other hand , the mode - coupling theory ( mct ) introduced by gtze @xcite provides detailed predictions on the dynamics of hard spheres when approaching the glass transition . for a supercooled liquid of hard spheres and below @xmath8 . although in some experiments centrifugation is used to realize such a quench , in most cases supercooled samples are prepared by shear melting . ] the mct predicts a two - step decay of the dynamic structure factor @xmath1 . the initial relaxation ( @xmath9 relaxation ) is due to the rattling of the particles inside the cage formed by their neighbors . the @xmath9 relaxation is followed by a plateau and a second relaxation ( @xmath10 relaxation ) , due to cage - escape processes . at the glass transition , the ideal mct predicts that the characteristic time of the @xmath10 relaxation diverges and thus that the plateau extends to all times , indicating a complete dynamical arrest . note however that on very long time scales ergodicity may be restored by thermally activated processes ( hopping ) , and attempts have been done to include such processes in the mct @xcite . good agreement has been found between the mct and dynamic light scattering measurements of the dynamic structure factor of hard sphere colloidal suspensions ( for a review on experimental tests of the mct , see @xcite ) , although the critical packing fraction @xmath11 predicted by the mct is smaller than the experimentally measured glass transition volume fraction @xmath12 . to overcome this discrepancy , the @xmath13 volume fractions @xmath14 and @xmath15 are often used when comparing experiments and theoretical or numerical work @xcite . in hard spheres , the dramatic slowing down of the dynamics when approaching @xmath8 is due to the cage effect : the motion of any given particle is increasingly hindered by its neighbors as the particles are packed more tightly . the glass transition is therefore driven by the repulsive ( excluded volume ) interaction between the spheres , and the arrested phase thus formed is termed _ repulsive _ glass . recent theoretical @xcite and experimental @xcite work has shown that the addition of short - ranged , low - energy attractive interactions can lead , surprisingly , to the melting of such a repulsive glass . this can be understood in the framework of the cage effect : particle bonding due to attractions results in the increase of the available free volume , thus loosening and eventually opening the cage . if the strength of the attraction is increased further , however , a new arrested phase is formed , because the bonds are sufficiently long - lived to effectively confine the particles . this arrested phase is referred to as an @xmath16 glass , although the term gel is also found in the literature . for a short general introduction to the topic of attractive @xmath17 repulsive glass , see @xcite . a brief and clear review of the experimental work on this topic is given in @xcite , while reference @xcite discusses recent theoretical advances . in the following , we will briefly recall the main results of mct and then focus on the experimental work . theoretical phase diagram for hard spheres of radius @xmath18 with a square well attractive interaction of width @xmath19 and depth @xmath20 ( data from reference @xcite ) . the different curves are labelled by the relative well width , @xmath21 . note the reentrant shape of the lines separating the fluid region to the glassy regions for @xmath22 . for @xmath23 a line separating the attractive and the repulsive glass phases ends in the @xmath24 singular point . the @xmath25 singular point ( circled cross ) is estimated to be located on the @xmath26 line ( not shown for clarity ) . ] shows the theoretical phase diagram for particles interacting via a hard - core repulsion ( @xmath27 for @xmath28 , where @xmath29 is the inter - particle potential and @xmath18 is the particle radius ) and a square well attraction ( @xmath30 for @xmath31 ) @xcite . the different curves are labelled by the relative width of the attractive well , @xmath32 . although the exact location of the lines depends on the detailed shape of the potential and the chosen approximated expression for the static structure factor , the features shown in are quite general . the lower part of the phase diagram corresponds to strong attractions ( @xmath33 ) and is occupied by the attractive glass . the upper - right region is occupied by the repulsive glass , while the upper - left part corresponds to the fluid phase . note that at small enough @xmath34 ( typically less than about 0.1 ) the phase diagram has a reentrant shape : there exists a range of volume fractions for which , at constant @xmath6 , a sample may be in the fluid phase or in either the attractive or the repulsive glass phase , depending on the strength of the attractions . for very short - ranged attractions ( @xmath35 less than about 0.04 ) , at high @xmath6 the attractive and repulsive glass regions are contiguous , separated by a line ending in the so - called @xmath24 singular point ( open square with plus in ) . when @xmath34 increases , the line separating the attractive and the repulsive glasses progressively shrinks , until the line and the @xmath24 singularity vanish and the so - called @xmath25 singularity is observed ( open circle with cross in ) . in the vicinity of the @xmath24 and @xmath25 singular points , as well as at the intersection of the attractive and repulsive glass lines , the system is predicted to relax with a very broad distribution of time scales , resulting in a logarithmic decay of the dynamic structure factor @xmath1 and a power law behavior of the particle mean squared displacement @xcite . simulations performed by using either a square - well @xcite or the asakura - osawa potential @xcite , have confirmed the predictions of the mct . experimentally , the more extensive tests of the two glasses scenario have been performed by three independent groups . pham and coworkers @xcite have used nearly monodisperse , sterically stabilized pmma particles to which polystyrene , a non - adsorbing polymer , was added to induce a short - ranged attraction via the depletion effect , leading to an attraction well described by the asakura - osawa potential ( for a review on this much studied experimental system , see @xcite ) . the strength of the attraction can be controlled by changing the amount of the polymer , while the range is of the order of the radius of gyration of the polymer . in references @xcite the phase diagram of this system is established and both the structure and the dynamics of the glass phases are studied in detail by means of light scattering . the so called two - color technique @xcite is used to suppress multiple scattering , and a recently introduced `` echo '' scheme @xcite is used to obtain properly ensemble - averaged measurements even when dealing with non - ergodic samples . as expected from the mct , at fixed @xmath6 the non - ergodicity or debye - waller factor @xmath36 for the attractive glass is found to be higher than that for the repulsive glass , because the motion of clustered particles is more restrained than that of repulsive spheres , which can rattle in the cage formed by their neighbors . accordingly , the liquid - order peak in the static structure factor , @xmath37 , shifts to larger @xmath4 vectors when going from the repulsive to the attractive glass . additionally , @xmath37 is less sharp for attractive glasses , since they are locally more disordered than repulsive glasses . in the vicinity of the @xmath24 point , a logarithmic decay of @xmath1 is observed over more than three decades in time . beyond the @xmath24 point , where the mct predicts that the attractive and repulsive glasses should merge into a single arrested phase , the non - ergodicity factor becomes independent of attraction strength , suggesting that indeed the two glasses phases are indistinguishable . however , quite intriguingly , the short - time behavior of @xmath1 remains different , a feature also reported in reference @xcite . similar detailed investigations , leading to comparable results , are presented by eckert and bartsch and by chen and coworkers . eckert and bartsch study a concentrated suspension of microgel particles , to which linear polystyrene is added to induce an attraction via the depletion effect @xcite . the microgel particles are bidisperse so as to suppress crystallization . this two - component system is mapped onto an effective ( polydisperse ) one - component system of slightly soft spheres ( the repulsive barrier is modelled by an inverse power potential @xmath38 ) , and is studied by static and dynamic light scattering . the multispeckle technique @xcite is used to access the long time dynamics and for studying non - ergodic samples . chen and coworkers @xcite investigate by small angle neutron scattering ( sans ) and dynamic light scattering ( dls ) a concentrated aqueous solution of l64 , a triblock copolymer of the pluronics family . l64 is composed of two end sections of polyethylene oxide ( peo ) and a central section of polypropylene oxide ( ppo ) . both ppo and peo become increasingly hydrophobic when the temperature @xmath39 is raised , but ppo does so at a faster rate . as a consequence , when @xmath39 is increased micelles are formed with a ppo core and a peo corona . at high enough temperature , the peo corona becomes sticky because of hydrophobic interactions , thus providing an attraction between the micelles . the experimental control parameters for this system are @xmath39 and the block copolymer concentration , @xmath40 . for comparison with the mct phase diagram , the @xmath39-@xmath40 experimental phase diagram is mapped onto a @xmath6-@xmath20 diagram by fitting the static structure factor obtained by sans to that predicted for adhesive hard spheres . note that the dls data are taken at a @xmath4 vector much smaller than that corresponding to the peak of @xmath37 , in contrast to the work of pham @xmath41 @xmath42 and eckart and bartsch . several features of the two glasses scenario predicted by the mct have been observed also in other systems . references @xcite report a rheology , sans and dynamic light scattering investigation of a solution of soft spheres , made of diblock copolymer micelles . an attraction can be induced by synthesizing diblock polymers with a controlled amount of stickers ( ethyl acrylate units ) . two distinct glass phases and a reentrant behavior are observed . the rheology experiments show that the elastic modulus @xmath43 of the attractive glass is larger than that of the repulsive glass , a feature predicted by the mct . note , however , that for these soft objects the difference in @xmath43 for attractive and repulsive glasses ( about a factor of 2 ) is much less marked than for attractive hard spheres ( more than a decade , see @xcite ) . the melting of a glass of soft spheres ( star polymers ) and a reentrant gelation upon the addition of a linear polymer has been observed by stiakakis and coworkers @xcite . although the phenomenology is strongly reminiscent of that observed in other systems with depletion interactions , the authors point out that the melting is due to the decrease of the range of the soft repulsion between stars upon addition of the linear polymer , while the gelation results from bridging flocculation induced by the long polymers chains . finally , the existence of a reentrant glass transition in laponite suspensions has been speculated , but not yet proved experimentally @xcite . qualitatively , the experiments mentioned above strongly support the mct picture of attractive and repulsive glassy states and show that this scenario is robust with respect to changes in the exact shape of the potential . a quantitative comparison is however much more difficult . indeed , even for the experimental system closer to the theoretical models , i.e. the hard spheres with depletion interactions studied by pham and coworkers , it is difficult to exactly locate a sample on the theoretical phase diagram , because of uncertainties in the parameters describing the potential and in the relative volume fraction @xmath14 of a sample @xcite . a comparison of the experimental and theoretical phase diagrams is given in reference @xcite , showing that the mct somehow underestimates the extent of the fluid pocket in between the attractive and repulsive glass regions . in view of the success of the mct in modelling suspensions of attractive particles at high volume fraction , attempts have been made to extend it to lower @xmath6 , in order to describe as a glass transition the `` weak gelation '' observed in attractive systems where particle bonds are non - permanent . in the `` cluster mode - coupling theory '' of kroy and coworkers @xcite , the mct is applied to clusters of particles , rather than to the particles themselves . this theory predicts the existence of a cluster phase that may freeze if the effective cluster volume fraction is large enough . recent simulations @xcite and experiments @xcite are consistent with this picture . a more detailed discussion of the delicate interplay between aggregation , dynamical arrest and phase separation that arises in relatively low @xmath6 suspensions is given in @xcite . for a discussion of colloidal gelation in connection to the glass transition , see also the review by trappe and sandkhler @xcite , which focuses on the elastic properties of these materials . in spite of the large amount of theoretical , numerical and experimental work of the last years , several questions are still open . we mention here two topics that are likely to focus the interest of researchers in the next future and are connected to the subject of this review : dynamical heterogeneities and aging . simulations on high @xmath6 attractive glasses suggest that , although the mct correctly captures the average dynamics , the particle motion is very heterogeneous @xcite , a feature also observed at intermediate volume fractions ( @xmath44 ) @xcite . new experiments are needed to characterize dynamical heterogeneity in attractive glasses and the new approaches described in may prove useful . no systematic experimental investigation of the aging behavior in attractive @xmath17 repulsive glasses is available yet , although preliminary dls data are presented in reference @xcite . they suggest a different aging in attractive and repulsive glasses : for the former , the dynamics keep slowing down for up to 10 days , while no significant aging effects beyond 2 days are reported for the latter . the destabilization of the attractive glass with time , due to activated dynamics ( bond breaking ) , has also been investigated in a series of numerical works @xcite . the slow dynamics of out - of - equilibrium soft materials have been investigated experimentally for a wide variety of systems , ranging from model systems of hard spheres to more complicated materials . quite generally , these experiments demonstrate that the dynamics at very long time scales are not completely frozen : many soft materials in the glassy phase have been shown to exhibit ultra - slow relaxations . after reviewing these investigations , we will describe the aging behavior that is very often associated with the slow dynamics . finally , internal stress relaxation will be discussed as a possible mechanism for slow dynamics and aging in many soft glassy materials very far from equilibrium . as discussed in , the ideal mct predicts the divergence of the @xmath10 relaxation time at the glass transition : therefore for @xmath45 the dynamic structure factor should exhibit a plateau after the initial decay ( @xmath9 relaxation ) . the pioneering dynamic light scattering experiments on colloidal hard spheres glasses of van megen and coworkers @xcite hinted however at a second decay of @xmath1 , after the plateau . unfortunately , the accessible time delays were too short to properly characterize this slow relaxation . qualitatively similar results are obtained by pham and collaborators @xcite . recent experiments confirm indeed that a hard sphere glass is not a fully arrested state and cage - escape plays a decisive role even in the glass phase . using a confocal scanning microscope , simeonova and kegel @xcite follow in real - time the fluorescence recovery after photo - bleaching of a small volume within a concentrated suspensions of hard spheres and derive from their measurements the mean squared displacement ( msd ) , @xmath46 , of the colloids . in the glass phase , they find a subdiffusive behavior @xmath47 , which extends over seven decades in time . the largest displacements are of the order of the particle size . this result is intriguing : it is fundamentally different from the ideal mct predictions and is moreover different from the light scattering results of van megen _ et al . _ , who observe an intermediate plateau of the msd , before detecting a further increase of @xmath46 at very large @xmath48 . interestingly , thanks to their extremely long experiments , simeonova and kegel have recently demonstrated that the subdiffusive power law growth of the msd corresponds actually to a transient regime ( lasting up to @xmath49 brownian times , or about @xmath50 days ! ) , after which a plateau is eventually reached @xcite . apart from these few reports , experiments probing the slow dynamics of hard spheres systems deep in the glass phase are still scarce . other systems , however , provide an opportunity to investigate in details the dynamical state of soft materials far from the fluid - to - solid transition . indeed , for several soft materials , the characteristic times are intrinsically smaller than that of hard - spheres systems , and a quench to a state far from equilibrium may be realized more easily . these systems include fractal colloidal gels , dilute suspension of colloidal charged platelets , concentrated suspensions ( or pastes ) of colloidal particles stabilized both by electrostatic and steric repulsions , and compact arrangements of soft deformable particles ( multilamellar vesicles or polyelectrolyte microgels ) , the volume fraction of the latter being essentially @xmath51 . thanks to the multispeckle dynamic light scattering method @xcite , the dynamics have been probed for time delays as long as tens of hours . a remarkable result of these experiments is that , for several soft glassy materials , the intensity autocorrelation function @xmath52 relaxes completely to zero at very long @xmath48 , a behavior indicative of structural changes over the length scale probed by the experiment . these findings have been obtained by dynamic light scattering both in the multiple scattering ( diffusing wave spectroscopy , dws @xcite ) and in the single scattering regime ( dls ) @xcite , as well as by x - photon correlation spectroscopy ( xpcs ) @xcite . diffusing wave spectroscopy measurements are performed on very turbid samples , or on transparent systems to which probe particles are added to increase the turbidity . using dws , a slow relaxation well separated from the fast dynamics by a plateau in @xmath52 has been measured for systems as varied as dilute suspensions of charged clay platelets ( laponite ) forming a `` wigner glass '' @xcite , colloidal pastes @xcite , and concentrated colloidal gels @xcite . the quantitative interpretation of the decay of @xmath52 is not straightforward : the standard dws formalism allows the msd to be calculated from @xmath0 , but it requires the motion of all scatterers to be spatially and temporally homogeneous @xcite , a condition that is likely to be violated in many glassy systems ( see ) . it is also worth noting that in these experiments the length scale probed is at most of the order of a few tens of nanometers , much smaller than the typical size of the sample constituents . qualitatively similar features have been observed in single scattering experiments on a variety of systems , including fractal colloidal gels with strong and irreversible @xcite or weak , thermoreversible @xcite bonds between the particles , compact arrangements of soft elastic spheres @xcite or of emulsion droplets @xcite , polycrystals made of block copolymer micelles @xcite , and suspensions of laponite @xcite . note that dls probes length scales much larger than those explored in a dws experiment , typically up to the size of the sample constituents or more . the full decay of the dynamic structure factor extracted from dls experiments is therefore particulary significative , since it is indicative of slow rearrangements that eventually change the system configuration on length scales comparable to or larger than the size of its constituents . an additional valuable feature of dls is the possibility to easily measure how the dynamics depend on length scale . this is accomplished by changing the @xmath4 vector at which the experiment is performed . several different @xmath4-dependencies of the characteristic time @xmath53 for the slow relaxation have been measured . abou and coworkers @xcite have found @xmath54 for a suspension of clay particles ( laponite ) , as expected for a diffusive process , such as cage - escape mechanisms . however , less intuitive scaling laws have also obtained by several groups on various samples . solomon and coworkers @xcite reported @xmath55 for a colloidal gel of adhesive particles , while bellour and coworkers have found for the same material as abou _ et al . _ but in a different aging regime , see also subsection [ subsec : aging] @xmath56 . these results remain largely unexplained . an intriguing @xmath57 scaling has been measured for a wide variety of materials , including both attractive systems ( fractal colloidal gels @xcite ) and repulsive systems ( compact arrangements of soft elastic spheres @xcite or of emulsion droplets @xcite , a polycrystal made of copolymer micelles @xcite , and laponite in xpcs experiments that probe the high @xmath4 regime @xcite ) . this scaling suggests that the slow dynamics be due to a `` ballistic '' motion of the particles , in the sense that the average particle displacement grows linearly with time ( this ultra - slow regime should not be confused with the ballistic motion of colloids observed on very short time scales , before the onset of brownian motion @xcite ) . a very unusual shape of the dynamic structure factor accompanies always this scaling : @xmath1 decays as a `` compressed exponential '' , i.e. @xmath58 $ ] , with a `` compressing '' exponent larger than one , @xmath59 . illustrates both the @xmath57 scaling and the compressed exponential shape of @xmath60 for the colloidal fractal gel studied in @xcite . note that the same compressed exponential shape was observed in reference @xcite , although with a somehow smaller value of @xmath61 . a ) : dynamic structure factor measured simultaneously at various scattering vectors for a fractal gel made of strongly attractive polystyrene particles , with @xmath62 . the curves are labelled by the magnitude of the scattering vector in @xmath63 . b ) : the sama data as in a ) are plotted as @xmath64 $ ] @xmath17 @xmath65 . all data collapse onto a straight line , thus demonstrating that @xmath66 $ ] , with @xmath67 . c ) : double logarithmic plot of the @xmath4 dependence of the relaxation time @xmath53 . the line has a slope of @xmath68 , suggesting a @xmath57 scaling . to avoid overcrowding the figure , not all the curves that were fitted to obtain the data shown in c ) are plotted in a ) and b ) . data taken from reference @xcite . ] because the relaxation is faster than exponential and due to the @xmath57 scaling , all models based on cage - escape processes must be ruled out . instead , we have proposed @xcite the dynamics to be due to randomly distributed internal stress sources acting on the sample , whose response is that of an elastic solid . simple scaling arguments lead then to the observed peculiar shape of the dynamic structure factor @xcite . a more refined model based on the microscopic description of local rearrangement events has been developed for the case of a colloidal gel @xcite . experiments testing the notion of internal stress as the driving force for the slow dynamics are reviewed in sub . finally , we note that there are strong indications that in this type of systems the dynamics is heterogeneous . the unusual dynamics reported above may therefore be due to a series of discrete rearrangement events , as it will be discussed in more details in . the properties of out - of - equilibrium systems continuously change with time as the system slowly evolves towards its equilibrium configuration . as a consequence , correlation functions , e.g. measured by dynamic light scattering , and response functions , e.g. stress or strain relaxation in rheological experiments , depend not only on time delay , @xmath48 , as for time - translation invariant systems , but also on the waiting time or sample age , @xmath69 . typically , the dynamics becomes progressively slower as the sample ages and the system spends more and more time in the metastable states it visits , the energy of such states becoming increasingly lower ( see references @xcite for an introduction to aging phenomena ) . very generally , age is defined as the time elapsed since the sample was quenched from a fluid to an out - of - equilibrium solid state . for hard condensed matter systems ( e.g. structural , polymeric or spin glasses ) , this is usually realized by means of a temperature quench . by contrast , soft materials are very often ( albeit not always ) initialized by applying a strong mechanical shear ; hence age is defined as the time interval between the end of the applied shear and the beginning of the measurement . aggregation phenomena leading to a percolated network may also provide a route to an out - of - equilibrium state : in this case , @xmath70 is taken as the percolation ( or gelation ) time . the first experimental reports of aging phenomena in soft condensed matter are light scattering experiments performed on hard spheres colloidal glass @xcite . although the accessible time window in these experiments was too short to investigate in details the aging dynamics , the data unambiguously show a slowing down of the dynamics as the sample ages , when the volume fraction of the sample is larger than @xmath8 . by contrast , no dependence of the dynamic structure factor with sample age can be detected when @xmath6 is smaller than @xmath8 . hence , the results of van megen and coworkers nicely demonstrate the dramatic dynamical differences between a sample in the supercooled fluid state and one in the glass state , in spite of the minute differences in sample composition . more recently , simeonova and kegel @xcite , using the fluorescent recovery after photobleaching technique , have found clear evidence of aging behavior in hard sphere glasses , since they measure a particle msd whose growth slows down with increasing @xmath69 . similar results have been obtained by courtland and weeks @xcite , who used confocal microscopy to follow in real - time the three - dimensional motion of individual particles in a colloidal glass . they find that the msd initially grows linearly with time , then tends to plateau , and finally exhibits a slight upturn at very large time ( similarly to what observed for the cage escape process in supercooled fluids ) . for glasses , the time scale of the upturn increases with @xmath69 . they also find that the dynamics is both spatially and temporally heterogeneous , although characterizing dynamical heterogeneities is more difficult than in supercooled samples , because the particle motion is very restrained and the statistics is poorer ( more details on dynamical heterogeneities can be found in ) . at all ages the most mobile particles form clusters ; however no obvious evolution of the cluster size or morphology with age is observed . to conclude the overview of experiments on the aging of hard spheres systems , we recall the preliminary dynamic light scattering results in reference @xcite , which compare the aging dynamics of a repulsive hard sphere colloidal glass to those of an attractive glass ( see ) and suggest different behaviors : the repulsive glass seems to stop aging after about one day , while the dynamics of the attractive glasses keep on slowing down after @xmath71 days . aging behavior has been most extensively investigated in soft materials which greatly depart from a hard spheres model system . these materials include colloidal pastes made of concentrated silica @xcite or polystyrene particles @xcite ( both stabilized by a combination of electrostatic and steric repulsions ) , diluted @xcite or more concentrated @xcite fractal colloidal gels of polystyrene beads , diluted suspensions of charged clay platelets ( laponite ) @xcite ( to which polystyrene beads may be added to perform dws experiments @xcite ) , compact arrangements ( @xmath72 ) of surfactant multilamellar vesicles @xcite , polyelectrolyte microgel particles @xcite , or polycrystals of copolymeric micelles @xcite . for these systems , rheological tests are very often employed to probe aging phenomena , in addition to light scattering experiments . rheological experiments , e.g. measurements of the stress relaxation following a step strain in the linear regime , are often compared to available theories , one of the most successful being the soft glassy rheology ( sgr ) model of sollich and coworkers @xcite . this model , derived from the trap model of bouchaud @xcite accounts for the rheology of out - of - equilibrium materials . in brief , in the trap model non - interacting particles evolve through a hopping mechanism in an energy landscape with wells of depth @xmath73 . the distribution of well depths is fixed and the evolution of @xmath74 , the probability for a particle to be in a trap of depth @xmath73 at time @xmath48 , is governed by thermally activated hopping . this model leads to aging phenomena when the average trapping time diverges . in the sgr model , the material is divided into elements which yield above a critical yield strain @xmath75 , thus relaxing stress . yield events ( i.e. rearrangements of the particles ) are seen as hops out of the trap , and yield energy is identified as the trap depth @xmath73 . the activation barrier is @xmath76 where @xmath77 is the maximum elastic energy before yielding , @xmath78 is the local shear strain of an element , and @xmath79 is an elastic constant . the link between the microscopic parameters and the macroscopic strain applied to the sample is straightforward : in between rearrangements , the local strain follows the macroscopically imposed strain @xmath80 . in reference @xcite , fielding , sollich and cates study the role of aging in the rheology of soft glassy materials . they describe several rheological tests suitable to investigate the ( linear and non - linear ) rheology of aging soft materials , whose features are qualitatively similar to experimental results . experimentally , aging behavior has been observed in dws @xcite , single light scattering @xcite , and linear rheology @xcite experiments . in all cases , the characteristic time @xmath53 of the correlation functions ( for light scattering experiments ) , of the stress relaxation ( in a step strain experiment ) , or of the strain evolution ( in a creep experiment ) increases continuously with sample age . however , very different aging laws @xmath81 have been found for the various materials investigated . in many cases a power law @xmath82 is observed , but the aging exponent @xmath83 may significantly vary . indeed , values of about @xmath51 @xcite , smaller than @xmath51 ( @xmath84 ) @xcite , and larger than @xmath51 ( @xmath85 and @xmath86 in references @xcite and @xcite , respectively ) have all been observed , reflecting in the language of glasses full aging , sub - aging and hyper - aging , respectively . a peculiar , very fast aging regime has been observed both in fractal colloidal gels @xcite and in laponite samples @xcite , for which @xmath53 is found to grow exponentially with sample age . this fast aging regime is eventually followed by a slower growth of @xmath53 , corresponding to full aging . note that the work by bellour _ et al . _ @xcite , who studied the aging of laponite over a wide interval of @xmath69 and observed both regimes , rationalizes the apparently conflicting findings of references @xcite and @xcite , which were probing only the exponential and the full aging regime , respectively . the experimental work reviewed in this section clearly shows that , albeit aging behavior is a ubiquitous feature of out - of - equilibrium soft materials , the detailed evolution of the dynamics with @xmath69 greatly depends on the particular system that is investigated . the large spectrum of aging behaviors measured experimentally hints at differences in the microscopic mechanisms at play in the various samples and stands as a challenge for more detailed theories . in subsec . [ subsec : slow ] , we have mentioned that a large variety of soft disordered materials were found to exhibit an unusual slow dynamics , with a compressed exponential shape for the dynamic structure factor ( @xmath87 $ ] , with @xmath88 and @xmath57 ) , indicative of ballistic motion @xcite . we have argued that these peculiar features could be rationalized with simple arguments , based on the concept that the dynamics be due to the relaxation of internal stresses . several experimental observations hint at the key role played by internal stresses in leading to the final relaxation of @xmath1 . cipelletti @xmath41 @xmath42 and manley @xmath41 @xmath42 @xcite have observed particle syneresis in colloidal gels made of attractive particles . when the gel is strongly anchored to the container walls ( as it is usually the case ) , tensile stress builds up in the sample as a result of the decrease of the interparticle distance , due to syneresis . further evidence for the role of internal stress is provided by experiments on concentrated emulsions , whose dynamics was initialized by centrifugation @xcite . the dynamics is systematically faster in the direction of the centrifugation acceleration , along which most of the internal stress has been presumably built in . for laponite suspensions , bandyopadhyay and coworkers argue that internal stresses are generated by the increase of the interparticle repulsion , due to the dissociation of ions at the surface of the particle , as revealed by the increase of the conductivity of the suspension with sample age @xcite . finally , similar dynamics were observed for a micellar polycrystal @xcite and compact arrangements of multilamellar vesicles ( mlvs ) @xcite , two systems for which the fluid - to - solid transition is induced by a temperature jump . for these samples , we expect internal stress to be built up due to the rapid growth of randomly oriented crystallites or mlvs , respectively . interestingly , linear rheology measurements on the mlvs @xcite show that the characteristic time of the mechanical response of this material follows exactly the same aging law as the characteristic time of the final decay of @xmath1 . since rheology probes the response to an external stress , while the final relaxation of @xmath1 is ascribed to internal stress , this concordance gives further support to the concept of stress relaxation as a key ingredient in determining the dynamics of disordered systems and their evolution with sample age . dense arrangements of mlvs @xcite provide ideal samples to test in great details the notion of internal stress as a driving force for the slow dynamics . as mentioned above , the fluid - to - solid transition of this material can be driven by a temperature jump . this has to be contrasted with most soft glassy systems , where the fluid - to - solid transition is obtained upon cessation of a large applied shear , which certainly influences the initial configuration of internal stress . for the mlvs , the physical origin of the internal stress is the elastic energy stored in the deformation of the vesicles , which are expected to depart from a spherical , elastically relaxed shape , due to their rapid and disordered growth at the fluid - to - solid transition . on the other hand , the linear elastic modulus @xmath43 is equal to the density of elastic energy stored by the material when it is deformed in the linear regime @xcite . therefore , both the internal stress and @xmath43 share the same microscopic origin , i.e. the deformation of the mlvs . it follows that the slow dynamics should depend crucially on @xmath43 , if indeed they are driven by the relaxation of internal stress . in order to test this conjecture , we have recently measured the aging dynamics of mlvs samples for which @xmath43 was varied over more than one order of magnitude @xcite . we find that the slow dynamics is faster for systems with a higher elastic modulus , in agreement with the hypothesis that the higher @xmath43 the larger the internal stress . remarkably , the slow dynamics and the aging can be entirely described by the evolution of an effective viscosity , @xmath89 , defined as the characteristic time measured in a stress relaxation rheology test times @xmath43 . the concept of effective viscosity is found to be robust , since at all time @xmath89 is independent of @xmath43 , of elastic perturbations , and of the rate at which the sample is driven from the fluid to the solid state . a simple model that links @xmath89 to the internal stress created at the fluid - to - solid transition is proposed . in this model , the ballistic motion of the mlvs results from a balance between a driving force , associated to the local internal stress acting on a region containing several mlvs , and a viscous drag . ( note that this model is similar to the one proposed in reference @xcite to describe the fast dynamics associated with the rattling of soft microgel particles within the cage formed by their neighbors . ) in this picture , aging results from a weakening of the driving force , due to the progressive relaxation of internal stress . indeed , we find that @xmath43 slowly decreases with @xmath69 , as expected if the measured elastic modulus is the sum of a ( constant ) `` equilibrium '' elastic modulus ( corresponding to an ideal , totally relaxed configuration of the sample , where all mlvs have a spherical shape ) and the internal stress , which decreases with @xmath69 . similar arguments should apply also to other soft systems , such as concentrated emulsions , whose elasticity , similarly to that of the mlvs samples , depends on the deformation of their constituents . by contrast , a very different behavior is observed for hard particles , for which the elasticity results essentially from excluded volume interactions ( entropic origin ) . _ study the age - dependent rheology of a colloidal paste made of silica particles @xcite . they find that the elastic modulus of the paste increases logarithmically with sample age , defined as the time elapsed since the system has been fluidified by a strong mechanical shear , while the elastic modulus of a mlv sample decreases . the authors suggest a link between the aging that they observe in stress relaxation experiments and the spontaneous increase of the elastic modulus . a phenomenological model which incorporates as main ingredients spontaneous aging and mechanical rejuvenation @xcite is able to reproduced the essential features of the various rheological tests performed experimentally , in particular the stress relaxation experiments , although in the model the elastic modulus of the sample is fixed . the same phenomenological model gives also results in good agreement with start - up flow experiments @xcite , where the time evolution of the stress is measured as a constant shear rate is imposed to the sample . they find both experimentally and theoretically that the stress overshoots before the system actually starts to flow . the amplitude of the overshoot increases with sample age , thus suggesting that the older the sample the larger the stress that has to be stored before flow can occur . this suggests that the system strengthens with age , in contrast with the decrease of @xmath43 observed for the mlvs . interestingly , a similar link between slow dynamics , aging behavior and stress relaxation has been proposed to explain the dynamics of a gently vibrated granular pile @xcite . kabla and debrgeas measure by multispeckle dws the two - time intensity autocorrelation function of the light scattered by the pile , @xmath90 . the sample is vibrated by applying `` taps '' , whose amplitude is small enough not to induce macroscopic compaction , but large enough to trigger irreversible particle displacements on a microscopic scale . the characteristic decay time of @xmath90 increases roughly linearly with @xmath69 , in surprising analogy with many glassy systems . by invoking arguments similar to those of bouchaud s trap model @xcite , the authors explain this slowing down as the result of a slow evolution of the ( gravitationally - induced ) stress distribution in the pile . weak grain contacts are progressively replaced by stronger contacts , leading to the observed aging of the dynamics and the strengthening of the pile . the literature reviewed in this section indicates that internal stress and its time evolution are quite general ingredients in attempts to explain the slow dynamics and the aging of many glassy systems . however , internal stress may play very different roles , either acting as a driving force for the dynamics ( as proposed , e.g. , for the mlvs ) , or evolving in response to other processes ( e.g. thermal activation or applied vibrations ) . the experiments reviewed here show that the role of internal stress , as well as the evolution of the elastic response during aging , may depend also on the way the samples are initialized and on the microscopic origin of the elasticity . indeed , the internal stress can not be the same when a system is fluidized by applying a mechanical shear or , on the contrary , without perturbing it mechanically . similarly , different aging behaviors of the stress distribution and the elasticity are to be expected in samples where the elasticity is due to the deformation or the bending of the individual constituents , or where it derives from excluded volume interactions . a great amount of experimental , numerical and theoretical work has been devoted to investigating the response of glassy soft materials to an external perturbation , usually a mechanical one . there are several reasons justifying such a broad interest . on one hand , these materials are ubiquitous in industrial applications , where their mechanical properties are of primary importance . on the other hand , applying a ( large ) mechanical perturbation is a way to modify the dynamical state and the aging behavior of a soft glass : in this case the dynamics may depend on the mechanical history , much as the dynamics of a molecular or spin glass depends on its thermal history . this analogy lies on the similar role of temperature and , e.g. , strain in driving the fluid - to - solid transition , as proposed by liu and nagel @xcite . finally , there is an intense debate on the relationship between response functions ( in the linear regime ) and correlation functions in glassy systems and the break down of the fluctuation dissipation theorem ( fdt ) . in this section , we will first review experiments probing the response of a system to a strong perturbation ( non - linear regime ) , and then discuss experimental work addressing the possible violation of the fdt . habdas _ et al . _ have performed original experiments @xcite where they measure the average velocity and the velocity fluctuations of a magnetic bead submitted to a force , @xmath91 , and immersed in a dense colloidal suspension ( in the supercooled fluid state ) . as also observed in simulations @xcite , they find that the average velocity varies as a power law with @xmath91 . they also find a threshold force @xmath92 for motion to be observed , which initially increases with the colloid volume fraction , but eventually saturates , suggesting that @xmath92 does not diverge at the glass transition . moreover , they do not observe an increase of velocity fluctuations when approaching the glass transition , as one might have expected if the probe environment became more heterogeneous . they suggest that @xmath92 be related to the strength of the cage and that the existence of @xmath92 hints at local jamming even if the colloidal suspension is globally in a liquid phase . two interesting extensions of this work would be _ i ) _ to perform the same type of measurements in the glass phase and _ ii ) _ to look at the rearrangements of the particles due to the forced motion of the magnetic probe . we note that experiments similar to _ ii ) _ have been conducted in a two - dimensional granular material where one follows the motion of all grains in response to the forced motion of one grain @xcite . note that in the experiment by habdas _ the motion of the magnetic probe is much larger than the brownian motion of the surrounding particles . as a consequence , this experiment probes at a microscopic level the non - linear rheology of the suspensions . macroscopic non - linear rheology experiments have been performed on a variety of systems . although it has been known for several years , and has been widely used in experiments , that the dynamics of soft glassy materials can be initialized by submitting them to a strong shear , recent experiments have investigated in more details the effects of shear on the slow dynamics and the aging of these materials . one important issue is to understand how the slow and age - dependent evolution of the rheological properties correlates with the mechanical history of the materials . a first answer is provided by cloitre _ @xcite , who have studied a paste made of soft microgel colloidal particles . they measure the strain recovery and the creep of a sample ( initially fluidified by applying a stress larger than the yield stress , @xmath93 ) submitted to a `` probe '' stress @xmath94 of variable amplitude . they find that the time evolution of the strain is age - dependent but that all the experimental data collapse on a master curve when the time is normalized by @xmath95 . the aging exponent @xmath83 decreases continuously from @xmath51 ( full aging ) to @xmath96 ( no aging ) as @xmath94 increases ( @xmath97 for @xmath98 ) . they propose that @xmath83 can be used to quantify the partial mechanically - induced rejuvenation of the sample . light scattering has also been used extensively to investigate the interplay between slow dynamics and shear rejuvenation . using the recently introduced light scattering echo technique @xcite , petekidis and coworkers @xcite have looked at the effect of an oscillatory shear strain on the slow relaxation of a colloidal glass of hard spheres , finding support for a speedup of the slow dynamics due to shear . bonn and coworkers @xcite have measured by dws the characteristic relaxation time @xmath53 of a glassy suspension of laponite particles , to which a shear of rate @xmath99 has been applied . similarly to the results of reference @xcite , they find that @xmath53 decreases after imposing a shear ; moreover @xmath53 is smaller for larger @xmath99 . the observed shear rejuvenation is in agreement with theoretical predictions @xcite . more quantitatively , ozon _ et al . _ @xcite have shown using clay particles ( smectite ) that partial rejuvenation depends only on the amplitude of the applied strain and not on its frequency nor its duration . they find that the relative decrease of the relaxation time due to a sinusoidal shear varies exponentially with strain amplitude , @xmath80 , implying that the mechanical energy input is proportional to @xmath80 . this result is in contradiction with the soft glassy rheology model of sollich _ et al . _ @xcite , which assumes a @xmath100 dependence , resulting from a local elastic response . this discrepancy is only but an example of how subtle and counterintuitive the mechanisms for shear rejuvenation may be . by investigating in detail the dynamics of a colloidal paste subjected to an oscillatory mechanical strain of variable duration , amplitude and frequency , viasnoff and lequeux @xcite have indeed demonstrated that the characteristic relaxation time of the mechanically perturbed sample ( as measured by dws ) may be either smaller or larger than that of an unperturbed sample . the former case corresponds to rejuvenation , while the latter has been termed `` overaging '' . an illustration of the rejuvenation and overaging effects is shown in figure [ fig : overaging ] . note that overaging is reminiscent to observations of the dynamics of a foam by cohen - addad and hhler @xcite , who have found that the bubble dynamics is strongly slowed down after applying a transient shear . viasnoff and lequeux interpret their findings using bouchaud s trap model for glassy dynamics @xcite ( see subsec . [ subsec : aging ] for a short description ) , assuming that shear is strictly equivalent to temperature . they calculate the probability for a particle to be in a trap of depth @xmath73 a time @xmath48 after a temperature jump of small amplitude . they find that the @xmath39-jump ( correspondent to the shear perturbation in their experiments ) modifies the lifetime distribution : at large times , the deep traps may be overpopulated compared to the unperturbed case , while populations of the shallow traps are equal in both cases . this change of the distribution of life times for the traps leads to an average relaxation time which is longer for the perturbed sample , and hence to overaging . physically , overaging demonstrates that a moderate shear could help the system to find a more stable configuration , by allowing it to explore more rapidly a larger portion of the energy landscape . ( left ) strain history and ( right ) normalized relaxation time @xmath101 ( ratio of the relaxation time of the perturbed sample over relaxation time of the unperturbed sample ) as a function of sample age . rejuvenation corresponds to @xmath102 and overaging corresponds to @xmath103 ( gray region ) . curves are labelled by strain amplitudes . overaging occurs for low strain amplitude . ( adapted from reference @xcite ) ] shear rejuvenation may lead to very peculiar rheological responses . coussot , bonn and coworkers have indeed observed for several systems @xcite a critical stress above which the viscosity @xmath104 continuously decreases with time and below which @xmath104 increases until flow is totally arrested . the authors interpret the viscosity bifurcation as resulting from a competition between aging and rejuvenation and propose a simple phenomenological model that captures the main experimental observations . an alternative way to perturb a system have been recently studied by narita _ the authors have measured by dws the slow dynamics of concentrated colloidal suspensions upon drying . they consider that in this experimental configuration a uniaxial compressive stress is generated in the sample . they attempt to map their previous findings of mechanically - induced rejuvenation and overaging on their experimental results . implicitly , they assume that the effects on the internal stress in the aging dynamics of the sample are similar to those of an external strain . detailed experiments are clearly needed to address this issue . finally , recent experiments of simeonova and kegel @xcite demonstrate that soft glasses can be considerably perturbed also by gravitational stress . by changing the solvent in which the colloids are suspended , the density difference between the colloids and the solvent , @xmath105 , is varied . two systems with gravitational lengths @xmath106 equal respectively to @xmath107 and @xmath71 @xmath83 m ( @xmath108 , with @xmath109 the boltzmann constant and @xmath18 the radius of the colloids ) are used . they find that gravity accelerates significantly the aging of the colloidal glass . thus , a direct parallel with the overaging effect can be drawn : gravity , similarly to a moderate shear , can help the system to find a more stable configuration . on the other hand , gravity prevents a full exploration of the configuration space , ultimately suppressing crystallization . indeed , space experiments have shown that hard sphere suspensions that are in a glass phase on earth do crystallize in microgravity conditions @xcite . how gravity couples to the particle rearrangements on a microscopic scale remains an open issue . for systems at equilibrium , the response to an external perturbation is related to the correlation function of the observable to which the perturbation field is conjugated . let us consider an observable @xmath110 and its normalized time autocorrelation function @xmath111 . if the system is perturbed by a field @xmath106 conjugated to @xmath110 , the response function is @xmath112 . at equilibrium , the fluctuation - dissipation theorem ( fdt ) relates the time derivative of the correlation function with the response : @xmath113 where @xmath109 is the boltzmann constant and @xmath39 is the system temperature . two common examples of the fdt are the nyquist formula that relates the voltage noise across a resistor to the electrical resistance and the stokes - einstein relation , which relates the diffusion of a particle in a solvent to the solvent viscosity . in deriving the fdt , time - translation invariance is required : as this assumption is not fulfilled for out - of - equilibrium systems , for them the fdt does not hold . for out - of - equilibrium systems , it has been proposed @xcite that the fdt could be generalized by introducing an effective temperature , @xmath114 . the time derivative of the correlation function and the response function are then related through @xmath115 . note that @xmath116 is expected to depend on the observation time scale and on the sample age and to be higher than the temperature @xmath39 of a bath with which the out - of - equilibrium material is in thermal contact . in the past , violations of the fdt have been experimentally observed for structural glasses @xcite , spin glasses @xcite , and polymer glasses @xcite ; moreover , an effective temperature has been introduced to describe granular materials @xcite . by contrast , experiments testing the fdt in out - of - equilibrium soft materials are still very rare . using available data from the literature , bonn and kegel @xcite examine the generalized stokes - einstein relation , @xmath117 $ ] , for hard sphere suspensions . here @xmath118 and @xmath18 are the frequency - dependent diffusion coefficient and the radius of the particles , respectively , and @xmath119 is the frequency - dependent viscosity of the suspension . they derive @xmath118 from dynamic light scattering experiments and @xmath119 from rheology measurements of either the high shear rate viscosity of the suspension , when considering the short - time diffusion coefficient , or the complex modulus in the linear regime , when considering the long - time diffusion coefficient . they find that , in a wide range of volume fractions ( between @xmath120 and @xmath121 ) , the fdt is obeyed ( @xmath122 ) for the short time diffusion coefficient , i.e. , at the larger volume fractions , for the particle dynamics within the cage . by contrast , for supercooled suspensions the fdt is strongly violated at longer times . the departure from fdt is quantified by @xmath123 , where @xmath124 and @xmath125 are reduced parameters given in units of the diffusion coefficient of the particle at infinite dilution and of the solvent viscosity , respectively . they deduce that @xmath126 can be as large as @xmath127 at low frequencies and for a volume fraction @xmath128 ; @xmath129 is found to decrease from @xmath130 to @xmath131 as @xmath6 increases from @xmath132 to @xmath133 . as expected theoretically , they find that @xmath134 at high frequency and that at low frequency @xmath116 is larger than @xmath39 and decreases continuously with @xmath135 following a power law . finally , we point out that , although the violation of the fdt is clearly evidenced in this work , the exact values of the effective temperatures should be taken with extreme caution since they are derived from experiments carried out with different particles . abou and gallet @xcite have measured the effective temperature of a colloidal glass of clay particles ( laponite ) , using a modified stokes - einstein relation ( the detailed theoretical formalism for the diffusion of a particle in an aging medium can be found in references @xcite ) . they seed the colloidal glass with micron - sized particle probes that can be tracked using light microscopy , and use these probes as a thermometer by measuring both the mean squared displacement and the mobility of the beads . from these measurements , they extract an effective temperature @xmath116 at a fixed frequency of @xmath51 hz . they find a non - monotonic variation of @xmath116 with sample age : @xmath116 is equal to the bath temperature @xmath39 for a young sample , it increases up to @xmath136 at intermediate age ( @xmath137 min ) and then decreases when the sample further ages . the authors relate the non - monotonic variation of @xmath116 with sample age to the evolution of the characteristic time for the relaxation of the colloidal glass as measured by dynamic light scattering , and argue that @xmath138 when the characteristic frequencies of the slow modes measured in dls are comparable to the frequency at which @xmath114 is measured . measuring the frequency dependence of the effective temperature would be needed to confirm this interpretation . the same experimental system has been investigated by the group of ciliberto @xcite . they probe the electrical and rheological properties of the material during the formation of the soft glass . for the dielectric experiments , the clay solution is used as a conductive liquid between two electrodes . the set - up allows the frequency dependence of both the electrical impedance and the voltage noise to be measured , from which an effective temperature is derived , by means of a generalized nyquist formula . they find that @xmath114 is a decreasing function of frequency and reaches the bath temperature at high frequency . moreover , @xmath116 decreases as the sample ages , while the fdt is strongly violated for young samples : @xmath116 can be larger than @xmath139 k at low frequency ( @xmath51 hz ) and small age @xcite . they show @xcite that the origin of the large violation is the highly intermittent dynamics characterized by large fluctuations of the voltage noise ( see for more details on the dynamic heterogeneities ) . we note that , in this line of thought , crisanti and ritort @xcite have shown numerically how an effective temperature can be extracted from the probability distribution function of intermittent events . because of the strong fluctuations of the noise in the experiments of ciliberto and coworkers , the value of @xmath116 extracted from the voltage data is extremely sensitive to rare events and to the duration over which data are collected . this may explain the discrepancy between references @xcite and @xcite concerning the numerical value of the effective temperature obtained by dielectric measurements ( about one order of magnitude ) . bellon and ciliberto @xcite have also tested the fdt for the rheological properties of the same system . to that end , they have built a novel `` zero - applied stress '' rheometer @xcite , by which the ( very small ) strain induced by thermal fluctuations can be measured . although strong aging properties are measured in the rheological responses of the material ( as measured also for the dielectric properties ) , no violation of the fdt could be detected . the authors propose several possible explanations for the discrepancy between dielectric and rheological measurements . in particular , they point out that the strong fluctuations of the voltage noise could result from the dissolution of ions in the solution . ion dissolution has been very recently confirmed by bandyopadhyay and coworkers @xcite who argue that the dissociation of the ions at the surface of the particles leads to the increase of the interparticle repulsion and is at the origin of the slow dynamics and aging of laponite samples . because the increase of the interparticle repulsion may lead to a rearrangement event only when the internal stress thus generated exceeds the ( local ) yield stress , fluctuations in the mechanical properties are expected to be much less strong than fluctuations of the dielectric properties , which are more sensitive to the release of charges . on the other hand , the rheology measurements of the group of ciliberto are in principle similar ( albeit not identical ) to those of abou and gallet , since both probe the mechanical properties of the material . abou and gallet measure a weak violation of the fdt ( @xmath140 is at most equal to @xmath141 at a frequency of @xmath51 hz ) , while the measurements of ciliberto s group do not detect any violation . however , it should be pointed out that the rheology experiments of ciliberto and coworkers may lack the sensitivity required to measure violations as small as those reported by abou and gallet . whether these experimental results are indeed conflicting remains therefore an open question . to conclude , we remark that experimental works are still scarce , owing to the difficulty of measuring simultaneously the response function and the fluctuation in experiments on soft materials . laponite clay suspensions have been mostly investigated and the results obtained so far by two independent groups and using different techniques display both qualitative and quantitative discrepancies . on the other hand , simulations works on a binary lennard - jones mixture @xcite have shown that the effective temperature is independent on the chosen observable , while it has been shown theoretically @xcite that the effective temperature does depend on the observable in the glass phase of bouchaud s trap model . more theoretical , numerical , and experimental investigations are needed to rationalize these contrasting findings . dynamical heterogeneity is now recognized as a fundamental feature of the slow dynamics of supercooled fluids and glasses in hard condensed matter , thanks to the large body of experimental , numerical and theoretical work carried out in the last decade ( a general review on dynamical heterogeneity can be found , e.g. , in reference @xcite ) . most early observations of heterogeneous dynamics focussed on temporal heterogeneity : the coexistence of different relaxation times was identified as the source of the non - exponential relaxations observed in glass formers . spatial heterogeneity was often invoked as the most plausible physical origin of this coexistence ( see @xcite and references therein ) . subsequent experimental and numerical work has shown that indeed the dynamics of glass formers is spatially heterogeneous , and spatial heterogeneity has been related to the cooperative nature of the slow dynamics ( for reviews on spatial heterogeneity that focus on experimental and numerical work , see for example references @xcite and @xcite , respectively ) . cooperativity plays a central role in many recent theories , where the glass transition is explained as a dynamical ( as opposed to thermodynamic ) transition driven by the divergence of the size of regions that undergo cooperative rearrangements . following this approach , analogies have been drawn with critical phenomena , the static correlation length of the latter being replaced by a suitable dynamical correlation length @xcite . it should be noted that most theories are developed in the framework of spin models or the so - called dynamically facilitated ( or kinetically constrained ) models @xcite , where the motion of on - lattice particles depends on the number of occupied neighboring sites . making quantitative connections between the results for these systems and molecular glass formers or colloidal systems may be therefore difficult . however , we note that recent numerical and theoretical work has shown that the concept of the glass transition being a dynamical critical phenomenon can be successfully applied also to lennard - jones glass formers @xcite and in the framework of the mode coupling theory @xcite . experimentally , soft materials provide a unique opportunity to study in great detail temporal and spatial heterogeneity in supercooled fluids and glasses , because the relevant length and time scales are more easily accessible than for hard condensed matter systems . in this section , we will review recent experiments that probe dynamical heterogeneity in a variety of systems , ranging from model hard sphere suspensions to more complicated glassy samples , such as colloidal gels and concentrated surfactant phases . most experiments are performed using time - resolved confocal scanning microscopy @xcite or recently introduced light scattering methods that allow temporal heterogeneities to be measured @xcite , as it will be discussed in the following subsections . optical microscopy and digital imaging processing allow one to follow simultaneously the individual trajectories of a large number of particles ( up to thousands ) , tracking their position to an accuracy of a few tens of nanometers @xcite . three - dimensional motion can be studied thanks to time - resolved , laser - scanned confocal microscopy . once the particle trajectories are known , a wide range of statistical quantities can be calculated in order to detect , characterize , and quantify dynamical heterogeneity . direct comparison with simulation work is possible , making optical microscopy a powerful experimental technique for investigating slow dynamics in glassy soft materials ( for a recent review of video microscopy applied to colloidal suspensions , see reference @xcite ) . early optical microscopy measurements of dynamical heterogeneities were performed by kasper and coworkers , who studied the self diffusion of tracer particles in a concentrated hard sphere fluid @xcite . the tracer particles have a core - shell structure : the outer layer is identical in composition to the host particles , while the inner core has a large optical contrast with the fluid and the host particles . the trajectories of the tracer particles are followed in a thin slice of a three - dimensional sample , allowing the mean squared displacement ( msd ) and the self part of the van hove correlation function , @xmath142 , to be calculated . @xmath142 represents the ( density of ) probability that a particle moves a distance @xmath143 in a time step @xmath48 . for a diffusive process , @xmath142 is a gaussian distribution . kasper @xmath41 @xmath42 find that in concentrated suspensions @xmath142 departs from a gaussian behavior , the deviations being increasingly marked as @xmath6 approaches @xmath8 . these deviations are due to a small but significant fraction of displacements @xmath144 larger than expected . deviations from gaussian behavior are quantified by the so - called non - gaussian parameter @xmath145 , defined as the fourth moment of @xmath146 , properly normalized ( @xmath147 for a gaussian distribution ) . similar experiments are reported by kegel and van blaaderen @xcite , who use confocal microscopy to study in two dimensions the dynamics of concentrated suspensions of nearly density- and refractive index - matched colloids behaving as hard spheres . in contrast to the experiment of kasper @xmath41 @xmath42 , all particles are tracked ( as opposed to tracer particles only ) , improving dramatically the statistics . for concentrated suspensions in the fluid phase , @xmath142 is reasonably well described by the sum of two gaussian distributions , corresponding to two distinct populations of `` fast '' and `` slow '' particles . this result clearly demonstrate the heterogenous nature of the dynamics , in agreement with several simulation works ( see , e.g. , reference @xcite ) . weeks and coworkers performed the first three - dimensional optical microscopy investigation of the slow dynamics of supercooled colloidal suspensions @xcite . they use pmma particles stained with a fluorescent dye and suspended in an organic solvent that nearly matches both the density and the refractive index of the particles . note that under the reported experimental conditions the particles are slightly charged @xcite . they find a non - gaussian @xmath146 , with a non - gaussian parameter that has a peaked shape as a function of the time step @xmath48 . the peak position corresponds to the characteristic time of the @xmath10 relaxation , and its height increases when @xmath6 approaches @xmath8 , indicating increasingly heterogeneous behavior . in the glass phase , no clear peak is observed . in analogy with previous simulation work @xcite , weeks and coworkers study the spatial arrangement of the most mobile particles ( the mobility is measured for time intervals comparable to the @xmath10 relaxation time ) . they find that these particles form clusters that have a fractal morphology ( fractal dimension @xmath148 ) and whose size , for supercooled suspensions , increases with increasing @xmath6 , up to a radius of gyration of about 10 particle radii . for glasses , defining the most mobile particles is more difficult , since no @xmath10 relaxation is observed and the cluster size depends sensitively on the way the mobility is calculated @xcite . when the particle trajectories are slightly averaged over time to remove the contribution of brownian motion , the clusters observed in glasses are similar to those observed for supercooled samples . interestingly , no change in the cluster size is observed for glasses during aging , thus ruling out the increase of the correlation length of the dynamics as a possible origin for the slowing down of the dynamics @xcite . in glassy systems , the relationship between dynamical heterogeneity and local structure is a long - standing open question . various experiments suggest that particle mobility is related to the degree of local disorder and packing , although it should be stressed that very small changes in the local structure are associated to huge variations in the dynamics . in the same three - dimensional experiment discussed above , weeks and weitz have shown that the clusters of the most mobile particles occupy regions with lower local density and higher disorder @xcite . two - dimensional systems allow a more direct investigation of the relationship between local structure and dynamical heterogeneity . cui and coworkers have studied the dynamics of a single layer of concentrated monodisperse particles confined in a quasi - two - dimensional cell @xcite ( note that this system does not exhibit a glass phase , but rather crystallizes at high enough volume fraction ) . at relatively high volume fractions and intermediate time scales , the dynamics is very heterogeneous , with two distinct populations of particles . the fast particles move in a string - like fashion strongly reminiscent of that observed in simulations of supercooled fluids @xcite along channels formed by the disordered boundaries between regions of slowly - moving , quasi - ordered particles . on very long time scales , infrequent , large displacements are associated with transient regions of lower density created by density fluctuations . a very elegant realization of a two - dimensional colloidal glass former has been recently reported by knig and coworkers @xcite . superparamagnetic colloidal particles are confined at the water - air interface of a hanging liquid drop ; the interactions between particles can be fine - tuned by applying a magnetic field , thereby fixing the `` temperature '' of the system @xcite . mixtures of particles of two different sizes are used , in order to prevent crystallization . the structure is analyzed in terms of locally ordered patterns of small and large particles that maximize the packing density @xcite . dynamical heterogeneities appear to be associated with the regions where the local order is frustrated and the local packing is looser @xcite . although in light scattering experiments no microscopic information on the individual particle trajectories are available , this technique still presents some attractive features compared to optical microscopy . the scattering volume is typically larger than the sample volume imaged by microscopy , thus allowing a better statistics to be achieved . a large experimental volume may be particularly important when the dynamics is spatially correlated : for example , for samples near @xmath8 , the size of the clusters of fast - moving particles measured in the experiments by weeks @xmath41 @xmath42 @xcite was comparable to the full field of view , thus making difficult their precise characterization . moreover , particles used in light scattering experiments are typically smaller than those used for imaging : as a consequence , the time scales of the slow dynamics are not as prohibitively long as for larger particles . in addition , small particles are less influenced by external fields such as gravity . finally , experiments can be performed both in the single and in the strongly multiple scattering limits , thus extending the possible choice of systems ( by contrast , optical microscopy requires nearly index - matched suspensions , except for two - dimensional systems ) . traditional light scattering techniques , however , do not provide direct information on dynamical heterogeneity , because of space and time averaging . in fact , the intensity correlation function @xmath149 has to be averaged over extended periods of time in order to achieve an acceptable accuracy ( typically up to four orders of magnitudes longer than the largest relaxation time in the system ) , and the detector collects light scattered by the whole illuminated sample . indirect measurements of dynamical heterogeneities are still possible : for example , the non - gaussian parameter @xmath145 that quantifies deviations from diffusive behavior can be measured ( see e.g. reference @xcite ) . however , it should be noted that a non - zero value of @xmath145 could be due either to the coexistence of fast and slow populations of particles , as discussed in the previous subsection , or to the same non - diffusive behavior shared by all particles . traditional light scattering experiments lack the capability of discriminating between these two contrasting scenarios . higher - order intensity correlation functions contain more information on temporal heterogeneities of the dynamics @xcite . in particular , lemieux and durian have studied the dynamics of the upper layer of grains in a heap upon which grains are steadily poured at a flow rate @xmath150 @xcite . they measure the 4-th order intensity correlation function , @xmath151 , where @xmath152 is the multiply scattered intensity measured by a point - like detector and the average is over time @xmath48 and a time lag by @xmath53 . this is different from the notation used in previous sections of this paper and in most numerical and theoretical works where @xmath48 and @xmath153 are used , respectively . ] . they show that , contrary to @xmath5 , @xmath154 allows intermittent , avalanche - like processes ( occurring at low @xmath150 ) to be distinguished from continuous dynamics ( occurring at high @xmath150 ) . moreover , both the statistics of the avalanches and the motion of grains within a single avalanche can be obtained by analyzing @xmath154 . the technique proposed by lemieux and durian still requires to average the ( higher - order ) intensity correlation functions over time . this poses a problem when studying very slow or non - stationary processes , as it is often the case for soft glasses . cipelletti and coworkers have recently proposed an alternative approach , termed time resolved correlation ( trc ) @xcite , where one takes full advantage of the multispeckle method . in a trc experiment , a ccd camera is used to record a time series of pictures of the speckle pattern of the light scattered by the sample ( both single scattering and dws measurements are possible ) . the dynamics is quantified via @xmath155 , the instantaneous degree of correlation between pairs of speckle patterns recorded at time @xmath48 and @xmath156 : @xmath157 . here , @xmath158 is the intensity measured by the @xmath159-th pixel and averages are over all ccd pixels . because any change in the sample configuration results in a change in the speckle pattern , @xmath155 quantifies the overlap between sample configurations separated by a time lag @xmath53 , as a function of @xmath48 . the time average of @xmath155 yields the intensity correlation function @xmath160 usually measured in light scattering , while the raw @xmath155 is analogous to the two - time correlation function studied numerically or experimentally for non - stationary ( e.g. aging ) systems . note however that in most simulations and experiments the two - time correlation function is averaged over a short time window or over different realizations of the system , in order to reduce its `` noise '' . by contrast , the essence of the trc method is to extract useful information from the fluctuations of @xmath161 . time resolved correlation measurements for a granular material gently tapped . the dynamics of this athermal system is due to the taps ; therefore both the time , @xmath48 , and the time delay , @xmath53 , are expressed in number of taps . inset : @xmath155 as a function of @xmath48 for a fixed time delay @xmath162 . note the rare , large drops of the trc signal , indicative of intermittent dynamics . main plot : for the same system , @xmath155 is plotted as a function of time delay , for fixed @xmath163 . the step - like relaxation of @xmath161 is due to large , rare rearrangement events similar to those that yield the downward spikes in the inset . adapted from reference @xcite . ] in order to investigate the temporal heterogeneity of the dynamics , it is useful to plot @xmath155 as a function of time @xmath48 , for a fixed lag @xmath53 . for temporally homogeneous dynamics , one expects @xmath155 to be constant ( except for small fluctuations due to measurement noise ) , as verified on dilute suspensions of brownian particles @xcite . on the contrary , a large drop of @xmath161 at time @xmath48 would be indicative of a sudden rearrangement event occurring between @xmath48 and @xmath156 and leading to a significant change of the sample configuration . large drops of @xmath161 have been indeed observed in trc measurements on a variety of systems , including colloidal fractal gels and concentrated surfactant phases @xcite , flocculated concentrated colloidal suspensions @xcite , and granular materials @xcite . as an example , the inset of shows trc data for the granular material studied in references @xcite : large drops of the degree of correlation are clearly visible , thus demonstrating the intermittent nature of the slow dynamics . these sudden rearrangements are also visible in the two - time correlation function , provided that no average is performed , as discussed above . the main plot of illustrates this point by showing @xmath155 as a function of @xmath53 for a fixed @xmath48 , for the same system as in the inset . the rearrangement events result in a discontinuous , step - like relaxation of the correlation function ( note that a similar behavior was observed in simulations on a molecular glass former , when the two - time correlation function was not averaged over different system realizations @xcite ) . by contrast , the @xmath164 intensity correlation function @xmath149 is often indistinguishable from that of a system with homogeneous dynamics . this demonstrates that great care should be used in applying standard equilibrium methods to extract from @xmath5 quantities such as the particles msd , because these methods usually assume the dynamics to be homogeneous . in particular , the preliminary experiments reported in reference @xcite on the same systems for which the `` ballistic '' motion associated with internal stress relaxation was observed ( see sections [ subsec : slow ] and [ subsec : internalstress ] ) raise the issue of how to reconcile intermittent dynamics with ballistic motion . a simple explanation would be to assume that the dynamics is due to a series of individual rearrangements and that the particle motion in a given region of the sample resulting from distinct rearrangements is highly correlated ( uncorrelated motion would lead to a diffusive - like behavior ) . the model proposed by bouchaud and pitard for the slow dynamics of colloidal fractal gels is indeed based on this idea @xcite . an important point in the trc experiments reported above is that the technique allows one to probe directly temporal heterogeneity , not spatial heterogeneity , because each ccd pixel receives light issued from the whole scattering volume . however , the very existence of large temporal fluctuations of @xmath155 demonstrates albeit indirectly that the dynamics is spatially correlated over large distances . more precisely , in order to observe intermittent dynamics the number @xmath165 of dynamically independent regions contained in the scattering volume has to be limited , because for @xmath166 many rearrangement events would occur in the sample at any given time , leading to small , gaussian fluctuations of @xmath155 . similar arguments have been invoked in recent simulation and theoretical works to explain non - gaussian fluctuations in systems with extended spatial or temporal correlations ( see for example references @xcite ) . in particular , the probability density function ( pdf ) of @xmath161 at fixed @xmath53 is in many cases strongly reminiscent of the `` universal '' gumbel distribution @xcite or of a generalized gumbel - like pdf @xcite . these distributions are characterized by an asymmetric shape , with an ( asymptotically ) exponential tail . we note however that the detailed shape of the pdf of @xmath161 depends sensitively on the lag @xmath53 @xcite , a feature also found in theoretical work @xcite . in the trc experiments discussed above , individual rearrangement events can be identified and the probability distribution of the time interval , @xmath167 , between such events can be calculated . for the flocculated suspension studied in reference @xcite sarcia and hbraud find a power law distribution @xmath168 . interestingly , this behavior agrees with theoretical predictions derived in the framework of the trap model for glassy systems , in the regime where a limited number of dynamically independent regions are observed @xcite . for other experimental systems , individual rearrangement events may not be distinguishable , because the drop of @xmath161 associated with one single event may be negligible . in this case , a measurable loss of correlation is always due to the cumulative effect of many events , even for the smallest delays @xmath53 accessible experimentally . deviations from temporally homogeneous dynamics are still detectable , however . an example is provided by the dynamics of a shaving cream foam @xcite : @xmath155 is found to exhibit large fluctuations on a time scale much longer than the average relaxation time of the intensity autocorrelation function . as a consequence , the two - time correlation function decays smoothly at any time ( no step - like relaxation such as that in b is observed ) , but its relaxation time slowly fluctuates with time @xmath48 . these fluctuations are quantified by introducing the variance of @xmath161 , defined by @xmath169 . @xmath170 is the analogous for trc experiments of the generalized dynamical susceptibility @xmath171 introduced in theoretical and numerical works on spin systems , hard spheres , and molecular glass formers @xcite . note that @xmath171 is proportional to the volume integral of the so - called four - point density correlation function , which compares the change of the local configuration around the position @xmath172 during a time interval @xmath53 to the corresponding quantity for position @xmath173 @xcite . because @xmath171 is related to the spatial correlations of the dynamics , this parameter provides a quantitative link between temporal and spatial dynamical heterogeneity . for the foam , @xmath170 has a peaked shape , the largest fluctuations of the dynamics being observed on a time scale comparable to @xmath174 , the average relaxation time of the system . this feature is strongly reminiscent of the behavior of the systems investigated numerically and theoretically in references @xcite . in simulations of glass formers , the height of the peak of @xmath171 increases when approaching the glass transition @xcite . this behavior has been interpreted as due to the increase of the size of dynamically correlated regions . the foam and the ising spin models studied in reference @xcite provide a means to test this hypothesis on systems for which there is a natural characteristic length that increases with time , due to coarsening ( this length is the bubble size and the size of parallel spin domains for the foam and the ising models , respectively ) . indeed , for both systems the same dynamic scaling of fluctuations with domain size is observed : @xmath175 , where @xmath174 is the average relaxation time of the correlation function and @xmath176 is the number of bubbles ( or spin domains ) contained in the system . similar trc experiments have been performed on a very polydisperse colloidal paste by ballesta and coworkers @xcite . they find that @xmath170 has a peaked shape , similarly to the systems reported above . moreover , the height @xmath177 of the peak evolves in a very surprising way : initially @xmath177 increases with increasing volume fraction @xmath6 , similarly to the growth of the peak in supercooled molecular systems upon cooling @xcite . in contrast with molecular systems , however , @xmath177 reaches a maximum value at intermediate volume fractions and is drastically reduced at the highest @xmath6 experimentally achievable @xcite . more experiments on different systems will be needed to test the generality of this behavior . in particular , model systems such as hard spheres suspensions are an attracting choice , since detailed predictions on the behavior of @xmath170 in the framework of the mct are now available @xcite . dynamical heterogeneity has been measured also by other techniques and in different systems . strongly intermittent behavior has been observed in the dielectric signal for a laponite glass @xcite , as already mentioned in section [ subsec : fdt ] . as a result , the pdf of the voltage signal measured in these experiments exhibits a non - gaussian behavior , with roughly exponential tails similar to those reported in reference @xcite . the microscopic origin of these events is still unclear . attempts to measure intermittent behavior in the rheological response of the same laponite system using the `` zero - shear '' rheometer @xcite mentioned in were , to date , not successful . interestingly , heterogeneous dynamics has been reported for a variety of granular systems , using different techniques . intermittency has been measured by trc in granular systems gently vibrated @xcite . these experiments show that the evolution of the system configuration is not continuous , but rather occurs through a series of discrete rearrangement events , similar to those reported in references @xcite for colloidal systems . on a more microscopic level , marty and dauchot @xcite and pouliquen and coworkers @xcite have tracked the motion of individual `` grains '' in two - dimensional and three - dimensional granular systems submitted to a cyclic shear . they find that the grain motion is strongly reminiscent of that of colloidal glasses : a cage effect is observed and deviations from a gaussian behavior in the pdf of the grain displacement are reported , similarly to the results of the experiments discussed in . collectively , these analogies support and extend to a microscopic level the unifying picture underlying the concept of jamming proposed by liu and nagel @xcite . as a final remark , we note that intriguing analogies exist also between the heterogeneity of the spontaneous dynamics of soft glasses and the behavior of many complex fluids under shear . indeed , for concentrated colloidal suspensions and surfactant systems the macroscopic rheological response to an applied constant strain or stress has been shown to exhibit large temporal fluctuations @xcite . on the other hand , simulations and experiments have shown that the stress relaxation and the flow of foams , ultrasoft glasses and concentrated surfactant systems are both temporally and spatially heterogeneous ( see e.g. references @xcite ) . although this heterogeneous behavior is usually associated to the existence of different microstructures ( e.g. disordered / ordered onion phases in @xcite ) , simulations of a simple model of an ( athermal ) generic yield stress fluid suggest that heterogeneity may exist even in structurally homogeneous fluids @xcite . in these simulations , the flow of a yield stress fluid sheared at a constant rate is shown to be due to discrete rearrangement events , whose characteristic size diverges for a vanishing shear rate . the basic ingredients of this model ( localized plastic events due to a microscopic yield stress and elastic propagation of the local stress relaxation ) are certainly relevant for many soft glasses . in particular , close analogies may be drawn between slowly sheared yield stress systems and elastic glassy materials such as colloidal gels where internal stresses are progressively built up and induce particle rearrangements . more work will be needed to explore in depth these analogies and to fully assess their relevance and generality . in this paper , we have reviewed the experimental work of the last few years on the slow dynamics in soft matter . in particular , research in four areas has been discussed : the existence of two different glass states ( attractive and repulsive ) , the dynamics and the aging of systems far from equilibrium , the effect of an external perturbation on glassy materials , and dynamical heterogeneity . as it was pointed out in many occasions in the preceding sections , these topics are closely related and indeed the same systems have been often studied in the context of two or more of these areas . at the end of each section we have listed what are , in our opinion , the most relevant questions that are still open : here , we limit ourselves to some brief final considerations . a great effort has been directed to developing unified approaches that may account for the similarities in the slow dynamics of many soft materials and for the fascinating analogies with hard condensed matter glasses and granular media . the most successful theory is probably the mct : initially , it was restricted to hard sphere suspensions , but it has now been extended to include attractive systems at moderate to high volume fractions . however , it should be noted that the deep physical reasons of its success are still somehow unclear ; for example , dynamical heterogeneity , now recognized as a key feature of the slow dynamics of most glassy systems , is not included in standard formulations of the mct . very recent theoretical work shows that quantitative predictions on dynamical heterogeneity can be made in the framework of the mct : experiments that test these predictions would certainly shed new light on the limits to the validity of the mct . an alternative unifying approach is the jamming scenario , which is however a conceptual tool rather than a fully - developed quantitative theory . its appeal resides in the large variety of systems whose fluid - to - solid transition may be rationalized in a unified picture , ranging from colloidal suspensions to molecular glasses and granular materials . the analogies in the local dynamics between glass formers and granular media that have been rapidly reviewed in this paper ( cage effect , dynamical heterogeneity ) provide additional support to the jamming scenario . another intriguing similarity hinted to by recent work is the increase of heterogeneity in unperturbed glassy systems when temperature or packing fraction approaches a critical value , which is paralleled by the growth of spatial and temporal heterogeneity in yield - stress fluids when the shear rate vanishes . this analogy is particularly suggestive in the framework of jamming , because of the similar role that is attributed to temperature ( or interparticle potential and volume fraction ) and stress in driving the fluid - to - solid transition . while the mct and the jamming scenario provide some guidance in describing systems that approach the non - ergodicity transition from the fluid phase , our understanding of materials deeply quenched in an out - of - equilibrium phase is less advanced . although some common features are observed ( dynamical heterogeneity and a general trend for the dynamics to slow down with sample age being two of the most prominent ) , a large palette of different behaviors is observed , which remains largely unexplained ( see , e.g. , the various aging regimes discussed in this review ) . the concept of effective temperature may prove useful to describe quantitatively out - of - equilibrium soft materials and their aging ; however , current experimental determinations of @xmath178 are still too scarce and yield contradictory results . in particular , simultaneous measurements of the effective temperature for various observables and in a wider variety of systems will be necessary . finally , we observe that stress relaxation appears to be an important ingredient of the slow dynamics of many soft glasses ; in spite of that , it has been generally neglected in theoretical approaches , with the exception of the model for colloidal gels cited in section [ subsec : slow ] . recent advances in the investigation of slow dynamics in glassy soft matter have been made possible by close interactions between theory , simulation and experiments . on the experimental side , new methods and techniques have been developed to extend measurements to out - of - equilibrium and very slowly relaxing systems . a great effort is currently done to obtain spatially- and time - resolved information on the dynamics , and to identify the most insightful quantities to be extracted from the raw data in order to characterize heterogeneous behavior . future advances will likely include the combined ( and possibly simultaneous ) use of these methods , in order to achieve a more complete understanding of the various physical mechanisms that drive the relaxation of glassy soft matter , as well as of their interplay . conceptually , the focus will be in identifying and explaining the `` universal '' features of the slow dynamics in vastly different systems . we thank the numerous colleagues that shared with us their results before publication . e. zaccarelli , v. viasnoff , and a. kabla kindly provided us with their data for some of the figures of this review : we thank them warmly . we are indebted to many people for very useful and stimulating discussions ; in particular we wish to thank l. berthier , e. pitard , and v. trappe . we are grateful to present and past coworkers in our group : p. ballesta , a. duri , and s. mazoyer . financial support for our research on slow dynamics was provided by the french ministre pour la recherche ( aci jc2076 ) , rgion languedoc - roussillon , cnrs ( pics 2410 and projet mi - lourd `` dynamiques lentes et vieillissement de matriaux '' ) , cnes ( grants no . 02/4800000063 and 03/4800000123 ) , and the european community through the `` softcomp '' network of excellence and the marie curie research and training network `` arrested matter''(grant no . mrtn - ct-2003 - 504712 ) . l. c. thanks the institut universitaire de france for supporting his research . see for example _ soft and fragile matter_. edited by cates m and evans m ( bristol : institute of physics publishing 2000 ) liu a j and nagel s d 1998 jamming is not just cool anymore _ nature _ * 396 * 21 sollich p , lequeux f , hbraud p and cates m e 1997 rheology of soft glassy materials _ phys . _ * 78 * 2020 gtze w and sjogren l 1992 relaxation processes in supercooled liquids _ reports on progress in physics _ * 55 * 241 dawson k a 2002 the glass paradigm for colloidal glasses , gels , and other arrested states driven by attractive interactions _ curr . opin . colloid interface sci . _ * 7 * 218 kroy k , cates m e and poon w c k 2004 cluster mode - coupling approach to weak gelation in attractive colloids _ phys . * 92 * 148302 richert r 2002 heterogeneous dynamics in liquids : fluctuations in space and time _ j. phys . : condens * 14 * r703 stieger m , pedersen j s , lindner p and richtering w 2004 are thermoresponsive microgel model systems for concentrated colloidal suspensions ? a rheology and small - angle neutron scattering study _ langmuir _ * 20 * 7283 chen w r , chen s h and mallamace f 2002 small - angle neutron scattering study of the temperature - dependent attractive interaction in dense l64 copolymer micellar solutions and its relation to kinetic glass transition _ phys . e _ * 66 * 021403 habdas p and weeks e r 2002 video microscopy of colloidal suspensions and colloidal crystals _ curr . colloid interface sci . _ * 7 * 196 simeonova n b and kegel w k 2003 real - space recovery after photo - bleaching of concentrated suspensions of hard colloidal spheres _ faraday discuss . _ * 123 * 27 berne b j and pecora r 1976 _ dynamic light scattering _ ( new - york : john wiley & sons , inc . ) diat o , narayanan t , abernathy d l and grubel g 1998 small angle x - ray scattering from dynamic processes _ curr . colloid interface sci . _ * 3 * 305 weitz d a and pine d j 1993 _ diffusing - wave spectroscopy _ in _ dynamic light scattering _ ed brown w ( oxford : clarendon press ) wong a p y and wiltzius p 1993 dynamic light - scattering with a ccd camera _ rev . instrum . _ * 64 * 2547 bartsch e , frenz v , baschnagel j , schartl w and sillescu h 1997 the glass transition dynamics of polymer micronetwork colloids . a mode coupling analysis _ j. chem . phys . _ * 106 * 3743 cipelletti l and weitz d a 1999 ultralow - angle dynamic light scattering with a charge coupled device camera based multispeckle , multitau correlator _ rev . instrum . _ * 70 * 3214 viasnoff v , lequeux f and pine d j 2002 multispeckle diffusing - wave spectroscopy : a tool to study slow relaxation and time - dependent dynamics _ rev . instrum . _ * 73 * 2336 muller j and palberg t 1996 probing slow fluctuations in nonergodic systems : interleaved sampling technique _ prog . colloid polym . sci . _ * 100 * 121 pham k n , egelhaaf s u , moussaid a and pusey p n 2004 ensemble - averaging in dynamic light scattering by an echo technique _ rev . instrum . _ * 75 * 2419 lemieux p a and durian d j 1999 investigating non - gaussian scattering processes by using n - th order intensity correlation functions _ j. opt a _ * 16 * 1651 lemieux p a and durian d j 2001 quasi - elastic light scattering for intermittent dynamics _ app . _ * 40 * 3984 cipelletti l , bissig h , trappe v , ballesta p and mazoyer s 2003 time - resolved correlation : a new tool for studying temporally heterogeneous dynamics _ j. phys . : condens . matter _ * 15 * s257 pusey p n and van megen w 1986 phase - behavior of concentrated suspensions of nearly hard colloidal spheres _ nature _ * 320 * 340 pusey p n and van megen w 1987 observation of a glass - transition in suspensions of spherical colloidal particles _ phys . lett . _ * 59 * 2083 gtze w 1999 recent tests of the mode - coupling theory for glassy dynamics _ j. phys . : condens . matter _ * 11 * a1 van megen w and underwood s m 1994 glass - transition in colloidal hard spheres - measurement and mode - coupling - theory analysis of the coherent intermediate scattering function _ phys . e _ * 49 * 4206 bergenholtz j and fuchs m 1999 nonergodicity transitions in colloidal suspensions with attractive interactions _ e _ * 59 * 5706 fabbian l , gtze w , sciortino f , tartaglia p and thiery f 1999 ideal glass - glass transitions and logarithmic decay of correlations in a simple system _ phys . * 59 * r1347 dawson k , foffi g , fuchs m , gtze w , sciortino f , sperl m , tartaglia p , voigtmann t and zaccarelli e 2001 higher - order glass - transition singularities in colloidal systems with attractive interactions _ phys . rev . e _ * 63 * 011401 eckert t and bartsch e 2002 re - entrant glass transition in a colloid - polymer mixture with depletion attractions _ phys . lett . _ * 89 * 125701 pham k n et al . 2002 multiple glassy states in a simple model system _ science _ * 296 * 104 chen s h , chen w r and mallamace f 2003 the glass - to - glass transition and its end point in a copolymer micellar system _ science _ * 300 * 619 bhatia s r and mourchid 2002 a gelation of micellar block polyelectrolytes : evidence of glassy behavior in an attractive system _ langmuir _ * 18 * 6469 sciortino f 2002 disordered materials - one liquid , two glasses _ nat . * 1 * 145 poon w c k 2004 colloidal glasses _ mrs bulletin _ * 29 * 96 gtze w and sperl m 2002 logarithmic relaxation in glass - forming systems _ phys . rev . e _ * 66 * 011405 sperl m 2003 logarithmic relaxation in a colloidal system _ phys . e _ * 68 * 031405 sperl m 2004 dynamics in colloidal liquids near a crossing of glass- and gel - transition lines _ phys e _ * 69 * 011401 foffi g , dawson k a , buldyrev s v , sciortino f , zaccarelli e and tartaglia p 2002 evidence for an unusual dynamical - arrest scenario in short - ranged colloidal systems _ phys . e _ * 65 * 050802 zaccarelli e , foffi g , dawson k a , buldyrev s v , sciortino f and tartaglia p 2002 confirmation of anomalous dynamical arrest in attractive colloids : a molecular dynamics study _ phys . e _ * 66 * 041402 sciortino f , tartaglia p and zaccarelli e 2003 evidence of a higher - order singularity in dense short - ranged attractive colloids _ phys . lett . _ * 91 * 268301 puertas a m , fuchs m and cates m e 2002 comparative simulation study of colloidal gels and glasses _ phys . lett . _ * 88 * 098301 puertas a m , fuchs m and cates m e 2003 simulation study of nonergodicity transitions : gelation in colloidal systems with short - range attractions _ phys . e _ * 67 * 031406 cates m e , fuchs m , kroy k , poon w c k and puertas a m 2004 theory and simulation of gelation , arrest and yielding in attracting colloids _ j. phys . : condens . * 16 * s4861 puertas a m , fuchs m and cates m e 2004 dynamical heterogeneities close to a colloidal gel _ phys . _ * 121 * 2813 pham k n , egelhaaf s u , pusey p n and poon w c k 2004 glasses in hard spheres with short - range attraction _ phys * 69 * 011503 poon w c k 2002 the physics of a model colloid - polymer mixture _ j. phys . : condens . matter _ * 14 * r859 segre p n , van megen w , pusey p n , schatzel k and peters w 1995 2-color dynamic light - scattering _ j. mod . opt . _ * 42 * 1929 chen w r , mallamace f , glinka c j , fratini e and chen s h 2003 neutron- and light - scattering studies of the liquid - to - glass and glass - to - glass transitions in dense copolymer micellar solutions _ phys . * 68 * 041402 eckert t and bartsch e 2003 the effect of free polymer on the interactions and the glass transition dynamics of microgel colloids _ faraday discuss . _ * 123 * 51 grandjean j and mourchid a 2004 re - entrant glass transition and logarithmic decay in a jammed micellar system . rheology and dynamics investigation _ europhys . lett . _ * 65 * 712 bergenholtz j , poon w c k and fuchs m 2003 gelation in model colloid - polymer mixtures _ langmuir _ * 19 * 4493 stiakakis e , vlassopoulos d , likos c n , roovers j and meier g 2002 polymer - mediated melting in ultrasoft colloidal gels _ phys . rev . _ * 89 * 208302 tanaka h , meunier j and bonn d 2004 nonergodic states of charged colloidal suspensions : repulsive and attractive glasses and gels _ phys . e _ * 69 * 031404 del gado e , fierro a , de arcangelis l and coniglio a 2003 a unifying model for chemical and colloidal _ europhys . lett . _ * 63 * 1 del gado e , fierro a , de arcangelis l and coniglio a 2004 slow dynamics in gelation phenomena : from chemical gels to colloidal glasses _ phys . * 69 * 051103 segre p n , prasad v , schofield a b and weitz d a 2001 glasslike kinetic arrest at the colloidal - gelation transition _ phys . lett . _ * 86 * 6042 trappe v and sandkhler p 2004 colloidal gels - low - density disordered solid - like states _ curr . opin . colloid interface sci . _ * 8 * 494 foffi g , zaccarelli e , buldyrev s , sciortino f and tartaglia p 2004 aging in short - ranged attractive colloids : a numerical study _ j. chem . phys . _ * 120 * 8824 zaccarelli e , foffi g , sciortino f and tartaglia p 2003 activated bond - breaking processes preempt the observation of a sharp glass - glass transition in dense short - ranged attractive colloids _ phys . lett . _ * 91 * 108301 saika - voivod i , zaccarelli e , sciortino f , buldyrev s v and tartaglia p 2004 effect of bond lifetime on the dynamics of a short - range attractive colloidal system _ phys . e _ * 70 * 041401 van megen w , mortensen t c , williams s r and mller j 1998 measurement of the self - intermediate scattering function of suspensions of hard spherical particles near the glass transition _ phys . rev . e _ * 58 * 6073 mortensen t c and van megen w 1999 dynamic light scattering measurements of single particle motions in hard - sphere suspensions near the glass transition _ slow dynamics in complex systems : eighth tohwa university symposium_. edited by tokuyama m and oppenheim i. american institute of physics 3 bandyopadhyay r , liang d , yardimci h , sessoms d a , borthwick m a , mochrie s g j , harden j l and leheny r l 2004 evolution of particle - scale dynamics in an aging clay suspension _ phys . lett . _ * 93 * 228302 ediger m d 2000 spatially heterogeneous dynamics in supercooled liquids _ annu . * 51 * 99 glotzer s c 2000 spatially heterogeneous dynamics in liquids : insight from simulation _ j. non - cryst . solids _ * 274 * 342 garrahan j p and chandler d 2003 coarse - grained microscopic model of glass formers _ proc u. s. a. _ * 100 * 9710 whitelam s , berthier l and garrahan j p 2004 dynamic criticality in glass - forming liquids _ phys . lett . _ * 92 * 185705 chamon c , charbonneau p , cugliandolo l f , reichman d r and sellitto m 2004 out - of - equilibrium dynamical fluctuations in glassy systems _ j. chem . phys . _ * 121 * 10120 toninelli c , biroli g and fisher d s 2004 spatial structures and dynamics of kinetically constrained models of glasses _ phys . rev . lett . _ * 92 * 185504 biroli g and bouchaud j - p 2004 diverging length scale and upper critical dimension in the mode - coupling theory of the glass transition _ europhysics letters _ * 67 * 21 ritort f and sollich p 2003 glassy dynamics of kinetically constrained models _ adv . phys . _ * 52 * 219 crocker j c and grier d g 1996 methods of digital video microscopy for colloidal studies _ j. coll . interface sci . _ * * 179**298 kasper a , bartsch e and sillescu h 1998 self - diffusion in concentrated colloid suspensions studied by digital video microscopy of core - shell tracer particles _ langmuir _ * 14 * 5004 kegel w k and van blaaderen 2000 a direct observation of dynamical heterogeneities in colloidal hard - sphere suspensions _ science _ * 287 * 290 kob w , donati c , plimpton s j , poole p h and glotzer s c 1997 dynamical heterogeneities in a supercooled lennard - jones liquid _ phys . rev . lett . _ * 79 * 2827 weeks e r , crocker j c , levitt a c , schofield a and weitz d a 2000 three - dimensional direct imaging of structural relaxation near the colloidal glass transition _ science _ * 287 * 627 yethiraj a and van blaaderen a 2003 a colloidal model system with an interaction tunable from hard sphere to soft and dipolar _ nature _ * 421 * 513 donati c , douglas j f , kob w , plimpton s j , poole p h and glotzer s c 1998 stringlike cooperative motion in a supercooled liquid _ phys . lett . _ * 80 * 2338 weeks e r and weitz d a 2002 properties of cage rearrangements observed near the colloidal glass transition _ phys . lett . _ * 89 * 095704 cui b x , lin b h and rice s a 2001 dynamical heterogeneity in a dense quasi - two - dimensional colloidal liquid _ j. chem . phys . _ * 114 * 9142 knig h , zahn k and maret g 2004 glass transition in a two - dimensional system of magnetic colloids _ slow dynamics in complex systems _ aip conference proceedings * 708 * 40 knig h , hund r , zahn k and maret g 2004 experimental realization of a colloidal glass former in 2d _ submitted _ zahn k , mendezalcaraz j m and maret g 1997 hydrodynamic interactions may enhance the self - diffusion of colloidal particles _ phys . lett . _ * 79 * 175 knig h 2004 local particle rearrangements in a two - dimensional binary colloidal glass former _ slow dynamics in complex systems _ aip conference proceedings * 708 * 76 knig h 2004 elementary triangles in a two - dimensional ( 2d ) binary colloidal glass former _ submitted _ lemieux p a and durian d j 2000 from avalanches to fluid flow : a continuous picture of grain dynamics down a heap _ phys . lett . _ * 85 * 4273 duri a , ballesta p , cipelletti l , bissig h and trappe v 2004 fluctuations and noise in time - resolved light scattering experiments : measuring temporally heterogeneous dynamics _ to appear in fluctuation and noise letters _ and _ preprint cond - mat/0410150 _ sarcia r and hbraud p 2004 using diffusing - wave spectroscopy to study intermittent dynamics _ proceedings of the 2004 photon correlation and scattering conference _ 60 . ( also at http://gltrs.grc.nasa.gov/reports/2004/cp-2004-213207.pdf ) kabla a 2003 dsordre et plasticit dans les milieux diviss : mousses et matriaux granulaires phd thesis , universit paris vii . ( also at http://tel.ccsd.cnrs.fr/documents/archives0/00/00/36/26/ ) caballero g , lindner a , ovarlez g , reydellet g , lanuza j and clment e 2004 experiments in randomly agitated granular assemblies close to the jamming transition _ preprint cond - mat/0403604 _ kob w and barrat j l 2000 fluctuations , response and aging dynamics in a simple glass - forming liquid out of equilibrium _ eur . j. b _ * 13 * 319 pitard e 2004 finite - size effects and intermittency in a simple aging system _ preprint cond - mat/0409323 _ mayer p , bissig h , berthier l , cipelletti l , garrahan j p , sollich p and trappe v 2004 heterogeneous dynamics of coarsening systems _ phys * 93 * 115701 bramwell s t , holdsworth p c w and pinton j f 1998 universality of rare fluctuations in turbulence and critical phenomena _ nature _ * 396 * 552 bramwell s t et al . 2000 universal fluctuations in correlated systems _ lett . _ * 84 * 3744 clusel m , fortin j - y and holdsworth p c w 2004 criterion for universality - class - independent critical fluctuations : example of the two - dimensional ising model _ phys . e _ * 70 * 046112 castillo h e , chamon c , cugliandolo l f and kennett m p 2002 heterogeneous aging in spin glasses _ phys . lett . _ * 88 * 237201 sibani p , jensen h j intermittency , aging and record fluctuations _ preprint cond - mat/0403212 _ bissig h 2004 dynamics of two evolving systems : coarsening foam and attractive colloidal particles phd thesis , university of fribourg . ( also at http://www.unifr.ch/physics/mm/scm_publications.php?type=theses ) donati c , franz s , glotzer s c , parisi g 1999 theory of non - linear susceptibility and correlation length in glasses and liquids _ preprint cond - mat/9905433 _ laevic n , starr f w , schroder t b and glotzer s c 2003 spatially heterogeneous dynamics investigated via a time - dependent four - point density correlation function _ j. chem . phys . _ * 119 * 7372 ballesta p , ligoure c and cipelletti l 2004 temporal heterogeneity of the slow dynamics of a colloidal paste _ slow dynamics in complex systems _ aip conference proceedings * 708 * 68 ballesta p , duri a , ligoure c and cipelletti l , unpublished . marty g and dauchot o 2004 subdiffusion and cage effect in a sheared granular material _ preprint cond - mat/0407017 _ pouliquen o , belzons m and nicolas m 2003 fluctuating particle motion during shear induced granular compaction_phys . lett . _ * 91 * 014301 lootens d , van damme h and hbraud p 2003 giant stress fluctuations at the jamming transition _ phys . rev . lett . _ * 90 * 178301 Abstract:

Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.

Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered . Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video . Paper: shock waves have been observed in a wide range of environments outside the earth , from the solar wind to the hot gas in galaxy clusters . however , the mechanism whereby the gas in these environments is shocked has been poorly understood . while shock transitions in the earth s atmosphere are mediated by molecular viscosity ( and hence direct particle collisions ) , those in interstellar space and the solar wind are too dilute to form in this way . in non - relativistic shocks , the role of collisions is effectively played by collective interactions of the plasma with the magnetic field . this results in a multi - scale shock transition having sub - structure at ion kinetic length scales ( larmor radius or inertial length ) and potentially electron kinetic scales ( inertial lengths or whistler mode ) ( e.g. , schwartz et al . ( this volume ) , treumann 2009 ) . such plasmas are termed collisionless . the magnetic fields threading through the charged particle plasmas in space endow the plasmas with elastic properties , much like a fluid . the kinetic energy of the inflowing gas is dissipated within this fluid via collective interactions between the particles and magnetic field , transferring energy from the magnetic field to the particles . the collective processes are the result of the dc electromagnetic fields present in the shock transition layer , kinematic phase mixing , and also plasma instabilities ; the last give rise to a rich range of plasma waves and turbulent interactions . it has long been known that these processes may heat the electrons beyond the mass - proportional value predicted by the rankine - hugoniot jump conditions - ample evidence is found in spacecraft studies of solar wind shocks ( schwartz et al . 1988 ) and multi wavelength spectroscopy of supernova remnants ( ghavamian et al . 2001 , 2002 , 2003 , 2007 ; laming et al . 1996 ; rakowski et al . 2008 ) and galaxy cluster gas ( markevitch et al . 2005 ; markevitch & vikhlinin 2007 ; russell et al . 2012 ) understanding how this process depends on such shock parameters as shock speed , preshock magnetic field orientation and plasma beta has been slow . in collisionless plasmas , the downstream state of the plasma can not be uniquely determined from the upstream parameters because the rankine - hugoniot jump conditions only predict the _ total _ pressure downstream , not the individual contributions from the electrons and ions : @xmath2 . at the limit of a strong shock , @xmath3 and @xmath4 are each 4 times their preshock values , so the relative values of @xmath0and @xmath5immediately behind the shock are wholly dependent upon the nature of the collisionless heating processes occurring at the shock transition . although an mhd description can be used to describe the behavior of the gas far upstream and far downstream of the shock , a more detailed kinetic approach is required for understanding how the dissipation at the shock front transfers energy from plasma waves and turbulence to the electrons and ions . non - relativistic collisionless shocks can be broadly sorted into three categories : slow , intermediate and fast . the three types are defined according to the angle between the shock velocity and upstream magnetic field , as well as the relative value of the shock speed compared to the upstream sound speed ( @xmath6 ) and alfvn speed ( @xmath7 ) . most astrophysical shocks are quasi - perpendicular ( i.e. , they propagate at a nearly right angle to the preshock magnetic field ) , allowing only for fast - mode propagation . in that case , the relevant quantity is the magnetosonic mach number , @xmath8 ( @xmath9 ) . collisionless shocks have also been classified according to whether the flow speed exceeds the sound speed in the downstream plasma ( kennel 1985 ) . above the critical mach number where the flow is subsonic , the dissipation of flow energy into thermal energy can no longer be maintained by electrical resistivity , and plasma wave turbulence ( the cause of which are instabilities generated when the electron and ion distribution functions are distorted at the shock transition ) is required ( kennel 1985 ) . shocks above the critical mach number are termed supercritical , while those below are termed subcritical . note that even for subcritical shocks , observations suggests that kinetic processes other than resistivity and turbulence contribute to the shock dissipation ( greenstadt and mellott 1987).there are also other , higher critical mach numbers related to the formation of subshocks ( kennel et al . 1985 ) and non - steady cyclic shock reformation beyond the whistler critical mach number ( krasnoselskikh et al . 2002 ) . the critical mach number for quasi - perpendicular shocks is estimated to be rather low @xmath102.8 ( edmiston and kennel 1984 ) . the mach numbers of most snr shocks are expected to be well in excess of this value , meaning that they are both fast - mode and supercritical . as one approaches the high mach numbers expected for astrophysical shocks ( @xmath1120 - 100 for an ambient magnetic field of 3 @xmath12 ) , a greater and greater fraction of the incoming ions become reflected back upstream from the shock front , corresponding to an increasingly turbulent and and disordered shock transition . physical parameters such as @xmath13 , @xmath14 and @xmath15 no longer jump in an ordered manner ( i.e. , the transitions are no longer laminar ) . in addition to the reflected particles , the hot ions from downstream become hot enough to escape upstream , further enhancing the population of ions in front of the shock . these ions , which form a precursor , are now believed to play an essential role in the dissipation of high mach number collisionless shocks . aside from providing the seed population for the acceleration of cosmic rays , the precursor ions are likely generate a variety of plasma waves capable of selectively heating the electrons over the ions , thereby providing an important mechanism for raising @xmath16 above the mass - proportional value of @xmath17 . taken at face value , the rankine - hugoniot jump conditions predict that electrons and ions will be heated in proportion to their masses : @xmath18 in collisionless shocks , there are three relevant timescales to consider : the time required for coulomb collisions to isotropize a distribution of electrons , @xmath19 , the time required for coulomb collisions to isotropize distribution of ions , @xmath20 , and finally the time required for the electrons and ions to equilibrate to a common temperature , @xmath21 ( spitzer 1962 ) . after a time scale @xmath19 or @xmath20 , the particles in question attain a maxwellian velocity distribution . the self - collision time , @xmath22 for electrons of density @xmath3 and temperature @xmath0 is ( spitzer 1962 ) : @xmath23 where ln@xmath24 is the coulomb logarithm , equation [ massprop ] has been used to write the relaxation time in terms of the shock speed and @xmath25 is the shock speed in units of 1000 kms@xmath26 . for a young snr having @xmath271000 kms@xmath26 , postshock density n@xmath281 @xmath29 and ln @xmath3030 the time required to establish a maxwellian distribution at the electron temperature given by equation 1 is @xmath31 0.004 yrs . the electrons are isotropized by self - collisions first , then the protons , and finally over a longer timescale the electrons and protons equilibrate to a common temperature . for this reason , coulomb collisions alone are unable to establish equilibration electron and proton distributions at the shock front . this equilibration is described by the relation @xmath32 where @xmath33 the temperatures @xmath0 and @xmath5 equilibrate to a common density - weighted average temperature @xmath34 , given by @xmath35 , where @xmath36 is the mean mass per particle ( @xmath37 for cosmic abundances ) . for mass - proportional heating , the timescale given by equation [ tep ] is @xmath382000 yrs for @xmath39 @xmath401000 kms@xmath26 , of similar order but longer than the proton - proton isotropization timescale , @xmath41 . these are longer than the age of the snr , substantially so at higher @xmath39 indicating that for minimal heating ( i.e. , @xmath16@xmath421/1836 ) the electrons and ions will not equilibrate to @xmath34 during the lifetime of the snr ( itoh 1978 ; draine & mckee 1993 ) . the arguments above indicate that coulomb collisions are ineffective at both isotropizing the heavy ion particle distributions and equilibrating the electron and ion temperatures at the transtions of collisionless shocks . the emission spectra of non - radiative snrs ( dominated mostly by x - ray and ultraviolet emission ) should therefore be sensitive probes of the collisionless heating processes at the shock transition . we consider the observational constraints of these processes below . the most useful shocks for studying collisionless equilibration processes are those exhibiting detectable emission from the immediate postshock gas . to be diagnostically useful , the emission should arise from the region close to the shock front , where temperature disequilibrium between electrons , protons and heavy ions is substantial enough to affect both the relatives fluxes and relative velocity widths of emission lines . the shape and extent of the spatial profile for the different emission species behind the shock is also a useful diagnostic , especially for the uv resonance lines of he ii @xmath431640 , c iv @xmath441548 , 1550 , n v @xmath441238,1243 , and o vi @xmath431032 , 1038 . for a given shock speed , the distance behind the shock where the emission peaks depends strongly on the initial electron temperature , and electron temperature immediately behind the shock . the ubiquity of non - radiative snrs , as well as their relatively simple geometry and very high shock speeds , makes these objects the most important laboratories for investigating the efficiency and nature of electron - ion and ion - ion equilibration . other non - radiative shocks available for study are those occurring in stellar wind bubbles ( for example , wolf - rayet bubbles ) ( gosset et al . 2011 ) and in galaxy cluster shocks ( e.g. , the bullet cluster ( markevitch et al . 2005 ) and abell 2146 ( russell et al . however , these shocks are far less frequently observed than those in snrs , leaving the latter as the most important objects providing both a broad range of shock speeds and corresponding diagnostic information ( such as proper motions and spatially resolved structure ) . shocks in star forming regions , such as hh objects and their associated bow shocks , tend to be clumpy and complicated , and are usually located in dense environments ( @xmath45100 - 1000 @xmath29 ) with low enough shock speeds ( @xmath39@xmath46100 - 200 kms@xmath26 ) to be radiative . in those cases , the optical and uv emission ( where the most valuable shock diagnostic line emission arises ) is dominated by emission from the cooling and recombination zones far downstream from the shock . in those regions the cooling of the gas below 100,000k and the accompanying compression of the gas result in a collisional plasma with @xmath47 . this erases any memory of the initial electron - ion equilibration . furthermore , a significant fraction of the ly @xmath48 continuum produced in the recomination zone is expected to pass upstream and ionize the preshock gas . in strong shocks ( @xmath39@xmath4980 kms@xmath26 ) , this results in complete ionization of hydrogen ( shull & mckee 1979 ; cox & raymond 1985 ; dopita et al . 1993 ) , thus precluding the use of collisionally excited balmer line emission from neutral h ( described in the next section ) as a temperature equilibration diagnostic . in the late 1970s it was discovered that very fast ( @xmath102000 kms@xmath26 ) shocks in young snrs could generate detectable optical emission very close to the shock transition ( chevalier & raymond 1978 ; chevalier , kirshner & raymond 1980 ) , providing a valuable diagnostic of physical conditions at the shock before coulomb collisions or cooling could alter them . this emission is produced by collisional excitation of h i as it flows into the shock front . the cold neutral component does not interact directly with the plasma waves and turbulence at the shock , while the ionized component is strongly heated and compressed by a factor of four ( when the shock is strong ) . some of the cold h is destroyed by collisional ionization ; however , the rest of the cold h undergoes charge exchange with hot ions behind the shock , generating a separate population of hot h. approximately 1 in every 5 collisions results in collisional excitation to the n=3 level of h , producing h@xmath48 and ly @xmath52 emission . the h@xmath48 line from the cold neutrals is narrow and reflects the preshock temperature ( @xmath5330,000 k ) , while that from the hot neutrals is broad ( typically @xmath54500 kms@xmath26 ) , and reflects the postchock temperature ( and to a large extent , the velocity distribution ) of the protons ( chevalier & raymond 1978 ; chevalier , kirshner & raymond 1980 ; smith et al . 1991 ; ghavamian et al . 2001 ) ( figure [ fig : balmerprofile ] ) . in balmer - dominated shocks , the broad to narrow h@xmath48 flux ratio is proportional to the ratio of the charge exchange rate to the ionization rate , with the latter being highly sensitive to the electron and proton temperatures . this makes the broad to narrow ratio , @xmath55 , very sensitive to @xmath16 . there is only weak dependence of @xmath55 on the preshock h i fraction and preshock temperature , mainly due to differences in the amount of ly @xmath52 converted into h@xmath48 in the narrow component ( ghavamian et al . 2001 ; van adelsberg et al . 2008 ) . -0.2 in the first systematic attempt to use balmer - dominated snrs to infer @xmath16 for collisionless shocks was attempted by ghavamian et al . ( 2001 ) . using the broad h@xmath48 line widths measured from a sample of balmer - dominated shocks , they constrained the range of plausible shock speeds between the limits of minimal equilibration and full equilibration . they then predicted the broad - to - narrow ratios for a grid of shock models over this range of @xmath39 and @xmath16 , allowing @xmath16 to be constrained . the range of broad component h@xmath48 widths observed in snrs ranges from @xmath10250 kms@xmath26 for the slowest balmer - dominated shocks ( cgynus loop ) , to @xmath10 500 kms@xmath26 for intermediate - velocity shocks ( rcw 86 ) and finally @xmath102600 kms@xmath26 for the fastest shocks ( snr [email protected] ) . this corresponds to a well - sampled range of shock speeds : nearly a factor of 10 . the primary uncertainty in measurement of the broad component width at low shock speeds ( @xmath57200 kms@xmath26 , as seen in the northeastern cygnus loop ; hester et al . 1994 ) is disentangling the broad and narrow components when they are of comparable width . at high shock speeds ( @xmath582000 kms@xmath26 ) the main difficulty is the baseline uncertainty of the surrounding continuum : if the peak of the broad line is low and the width very large , errors in ascertaining where the broad line merges into the background can lead to underestimates of the broad component width . the range of @xmath55 for this sample of balmer - dominated shocks lies between 0.4 and 1.2 ( kirshner , winkler & chevalier 1987 ; smith et al . 1991 ; ghavamian et al . 2001 ; 2003 , rakowski , ghavamian & laming 2009 ) . however , it does not not vary with broad component width in a monotonic fashion . recently there has been substantial improvement in the modeling of balmer - dominated shocks . earlier calculations of the broad h@xmath48 line profile assumed that it formed from a single charge exchange ( chevalier , kirshner & raymond 1980 ; smith et al . 1991 ; ghavamian et al . 2001 ) , and it treated the hot and cold neutrals as two separate , distinct populations , with a given neutral belonging to either one or the other . however , in reality an interaction tree is required to track the number of photons emitted by each neutral over multiple excitations and charge exchanges . these effects were first incorporated in the balmer - dominated shock models of heng & mccray ( 2007 ) , who also found that charge exchange results in a third population of neutrals having velocity widths intermediate between the hot and cold neutrals . further improvements in modeling of balmer - dominated shocks were included by van adelsberg et al . ( 2008 ) , who included the momentum transferred by charge exchange between the hot neutrals and protons . this allowed the bulk velocity of the postshock neutrals to be calculated separately from those of the protons . inclusion of the momentum transfer showed that for shock speeds @xmath571000 kms@xmath26 , charge exchange effectively couples the fast neutral and thermal proton distributions , while for high shock speeds ( @xmath585000 kms@xmath26 ) , it does so far less effectively . this results in a fast neutral distribution that is skewed relative to the protons in velocity space and an average velocity that is much higher for the fast neutrals than the protons ( van adelsberg et al . together , the inclusion of all these effects has enhanced the ability of the models to match the observed broad - to - narrow ratios ( and hence predict @xmath16 ) . in particular , the newer models can now match the low broad - to - narrow ratio ( @[email protected] ) observed in knot g of tycho s snr , yielding @[email protected] , @xmath39@xmath591600 kms@xmath26 . however , even after all the additional physics is included , the balmer - dominated shock models are still unable to reach the low broad - to - narrow ratios measured along the rims of dem l71 ( @[email protected] - 0.7 ; ghavamian et al . 2003 ; rakowski , ghavamian & laming 2009 ) . the electron - ion equilibration in dem l 71 was instead determined via comparison of broad h@xmath48 line fwhm with postshock electron temperatures measured from _ chandra _ observations ( rakowski , ghavamian & hughes 2003 ) . the most promising explanation advanced for the @xmath55 discrepancy has been added narrow component flux from the shock precursor ( raymond et al . 2011 ; morlino et al . 2012 ) , hitherto not included in the earlier shock models ( ghavamian et al . 2003 , rakowski , ghavamian & laming 2009 ) . these developments are described in more detail in the next section . the plot of @xmath16 versus @xmath39for the available sample of balmer - dominated shocks shows a declining trend of equilibration with shock speed ( ghavamian et al . 2007 ; heng et al . 2007 ; van adelsberg et al . 2008 ) . the trend is described by ghavamian et al . ( 2007 ) as full equilibration for shock speeds up to and including 400 kms@xmath26 , and a declining equilibration proportional to the inverse square of the shock speed above 400 kms@xmath26 . this description can be characterized in the following way : @xmath60 where the functional form of the the @xmath16 relation is designed to asymptotically transition to @xmath16=@xmath17 at very high shock velocities . the most up to date plot of @xmath16 versus shock speed , reproduced from van adelsberg et al . ( 2008 ) , is shown in figure [ fig : plotequil ] ( note that the shock models used in producing these plots do not include contribution from the shock precursor ) . although the inverse correlation between @xmath16 and @xmath39was largely confirmed by van adelsberg et al ( 2008 ) , there may be some evidence of departure from the @xmath16@xmath50 @xmath61 relation at shock speeds exceeding 2000 kms@xmath26 . van adelsberg et al . find that when all three measured broad component widths and broad - to - narrow ratios from sn 1006 are included in the plot ( @xmath39@xmath102200 - 2500 kms@xmath26 ) , a slight upturn in the @xmath16-@xmath39 relation appears . the @xmath16 ratios for those cases are found to be @xmath100.03 , superficially similar to @xmath62 , rather than @xmath63 . the reason for the discrepancy is not clear , nor whether this indicates a breakdown in the @xmath61 dependence at shock speeds exceeding 2000 kms@xmath26 . some caveats to consider when interpreting the upturn in @xmath16 seen in figure [ fig : plotequil ] are as follows : for shock speeds @xmath582000 kms@xmath26 collisional ionization and excitation of h are primarily caused by proton ( and to a lesser degree , alpha particle ) impact ( laming et al . 1996 ; ghavamian 1999 ; ghavamian et al . 2001 ; tseliakhovich et al . experimentally measured cross sections for these interactions have still not been available to high precision ( uncertainties @xmath1020%-30% still exist ) , although more sophisticated theoretical calculations are now becoming available ( see , for example , tseliakhovich et al . in addition , as the broad component width increases , the h@xmath48 profiles are spread out over an increasing number of pixels , resulting in noisier spectra and greater measurement uncertainty in the broad component width . these larger error bars in turn result in a larger uncertainty in @xmath39 , especially at shock speeds of 2000 kms@xmath26 and higher . the best way to further constrain the equilibration - shock speed relation is to add new data points to the curve shown in figure [ fig : plotequil ] . to this end , we present balmer - dominated h@xmath48 profiles for two additional positions in tycho s snr ( different from those of knot g presented by kirshner , winkler & chevalier ( 1987 ) , smith et al . ( 1991 ) and ghavamian et al . ( 2001 ) ) . these profiles , shown in figure [ fig : tychocennwspec ] , were acquired with a moderate resolution spectrograph in 1998 ( for details on the observational setup , see ghavamian 1999 and ghavamian et al . the profile marked ne was obtained from a clump of h@xmath48 emission located along the northeastern edge of tycho s snr , approximately 1@xmath64 northward of knot g. the clump appears behind the main body of the balmer filaments and exhibits a broad component that is substantially doppler shifted to the red ( [email protected] , or about 490 kms@xmath26 ) . the doppler shift reflects the bulk velocity of the hot posthock proton distribution , so the significant velocity shift of the broad component centroid indicates that the shock in the ne has a substantial velocity component into the plane of the sky , i.e. , that the ne shock is located on the far side of the blast wave shell . the broad h@xmath48 width of the ne shock is 1300@xmath6565 kms@xmath26 ( the smallest broad component width measured in tycho s snr so far ) , with @[email protected] . the nw shock , on the other hand , has a broad h@xmath48 width of 2040@xmath6555 kms@xmath26 ( the largest broad component width measured in this snr so far ) , with @[email protected] . neither of these broad - to - narrow ratios is strictly reproduced by the latest models of van adelsberg et al . ( 2008 ) , with the lowest predicted ratios being for case b ( the assumption of optically thick conditions for ly @xmath52 photons in the narrow component ) and for low equilibrations ( @[email protected] ) . for these low equilibrations , the corresponding shock speeds for the ne and nw shocks in tycho are approximately 1400 kms@xmath26 and 2250 kms@xmath26 ( using figures 5 and 10 of van adelsberg et al . 2008 ) . in figure [ fig : plotequil ] we have added data from the ne and nw shocks in tycho s snr to the @xmath16-@xmath39 plot . the two data points help fill in a portion of the plot where the data are sparse : the region between approximately 1200 kms@xmath26 and 1500 kms@xmath26 , as well as the region beyond 2000 kms@xmath26 , where the existing data are taken entirely from sn 1006 . the added point near 1400 kms@xmath26 is fully consistent with the @xmath61 relation , while @xmath16 is not well constrained enough for the point at 2250 kms@xmath26 to contradict the appearance of an upturn at the highest shock velocities . it is clear that proper characterization of the equilibration - shock velocity curve above 2000 kms@xmath26 will require both higher signal - to - noise spectra on existing balmer - dominated shocks , as well as new data points beyond a broad component width of 2500 kms@xmath26 . although the inverse squared relation between equilibration and shock velocity appears has been the most salient result of the study of balmer - dominated shocks , there have been discrepant results reported in a small subset of cases . recently the broad h@xmath48 component in the lmc snr [email protected] was detected for the first time ( helder , kosenko & vink 2010 ) . broad emission was observed along both the northeastern rim ( fwhm 3900@xmath65800 kms@xmath26 ) and southwestern rim ( fwhm 2680@xmath6570 kms@xmath26 ) , with the former being the fastest balmer - dominated shock detected to date having the characteristic broad and narrow component h@xmath48 emission . interestingly , the broad - to - narrow ratios for both shocks are exceptionally low , @[email protected] and [email protected] along the ne and sw rims , respectively . as noted by helder , kosenko & vink ( 2010 ) these ratios are nearly twice as large as the smallest ones predicted by the models of van adelsberg et al . ( 2008 ) , precluding measurement of @xmath16 from the balmer - dominated spectra and implicating excess narrow component h@xmath48 emission in a cosmic ray precursor once again . using rgs spectra of snr [email protected] acquired with _ xmm - newton _ , they obtained a forward shock speed of approximately 5000 kms@xmath26 in the sw . this implies a broad h@xmath48 width of 3600 kms@xmath26 , substantially smaller than the measured width of 2680 kms@xmath26 . helder , kosenko & vink ( 2010 ) suggest that this indicates some thermal energy loss ( @xmath1020% ) to cosmic ray acceleration . this picture is supported by the presence of nonthermal x - ray emission in their fitted rgs spectra of snr [email protected] . the result described above relies upon an accurate disentangling of the bulk doppler broadening from the thermal doppler broadening in the x - ray lines . the disentangling depends on parameters such as the ratio of reverse shock to forward shock velocities , as well as the ratio of the gradients in the reverse and forward shock velocities , which in turn had to be assumed from evolutionary snr models . the result , while intriguing , is still significantly uncertain . on the other hand , helder , kosenko & vink ( 2010 ) found that the x - ray shock velocities from the ne could only be reconciled with the observed broad h@xmath48 width there if @[email protected] , which clearly which predicts @xmath16@xmath67 predicted from equation [ tetpeq ] . if this result were to be confimed by future observations , it would present a new challenge in understanding how electron - ion equilibration occurs in fast collisionless shocks . one possibility , given the presence of nonthermal x - ray emission in the spectra of [email protected] ( warren & hughes 2004 ; helder , kosenko & vink 2010 ) is that the moderate loss of thermal energy to cosmic ray acceleration may have slightly increased the compression and reduced the temperature at the shock front compared to the case with no acceleration ( decourchelle , ellison & ballet 2000 ; ellison et al . 2007 ) . both of these effects would tend to render the plasma more collisional , possibly explaining the @[email protected] result . however , it is also worth noting that the shock velocity used for obtaining @xmath16 in the ne is subject to the same model dependence and uncertainties as the sw measurements , so similar caution is required in its interpretation . a similar combined optical and x - ray study of rcw 86 was performed by helder et al . ( 2009,2011 ) . there , the broad component h@xmath48 widths were supplemented with electron temperatures measured from _ xmm - newton _ rgs spectra from the same projected locations along the rim . one of the main results of this study was that the slower shocks ( broad h@xmath48 fwhm @xmath10500 - 600 kms@xmath26 ) showed showed @xmath16@xmath101 , agreeing with earlier results from similar shocks observed both in rcw 86 and elsewhere ( ghavamian et al . ( 1999 , 2001 , 2007 ) ) . however , helder et al . ( 2011 ) found while the results were indeed consistent with low equilibration at the shock front for fast shocks ( @[email protected] for broad fwhm @xmath101100 kms@xmath26 ) ) and higher equilibration for the slower shocks ( @xmath16@xmath591 for broad fwhm @xmath10650 kms@xmath26 ) , their x - ray derived electron temperatures were inconsistent with @xmath680.3 kev at the shock front contradicting the suggestion of ghavamian et al . ( 2007 ) that shocks above 400 kms@xmath26 may all heat electrons to roughly 0.3 kev . however , a major caveat of these results is that the forward shock in rcw 86 is believed to be impacting the walls of a wind - blown bubble ( williams et al . 2011 ) , resulting in substantial localized variations in shock speed around the rim . these variations occur as different parts of the forward shock impact the cavity wall at different times . while the broad component h@xmath48 widths closely trace the current position of the shock front , the x - ray emission behind that shock arises over a much more extended spatial scale , and is sensitive to the history of the forward shock interaction with the cavity wall . furthermore , narrowband h@xmath48 imagery of rcw 86 with the eso very large telescope ( helder et al . ( 2009 , 2011 ) ) shows a complex morphology of filaments , especially along the eastern side of the snr . the broad h@xmath48 components of these filaments exhibit substantial , localized variations in line width , ranging from @xmath10600 kms@xmath26 fwhm to 1100 kms@xmath26 ghavamian ( 1999 ) , helder et al . ( 2009 , 2011 ) ) . these variations reflect localized changes in density and viewing geometry along the line of sight . as such , uniquely mapping the observed balmer filaments to their corresponding x - ray emission in _ xmm - newton _ data ( especially given the somewhat coarse 10@xmath69 spatial resolution of that instrument ) is fraught with uncertainty . additional corroboration for these results would be desirable . perhaps the most important and exciting recent development in our understanding of balmer - dominated shocks has come with the development of new kinetic - based shock models . blasi et al . ( 2012 ) have introduced a kinetic model for following the momentum and energy exchange between neutrals and ions , along with the back - reaction of those neutrals when they pass back upstream and form a fast neutral precursor . rather than assume a maxwellian velocity distribution for the neutrals ( as had been done in previous models , despite the lack of thermal contact between neutrals needed to justify such an assumption ) , both the ion and neutral distributions are computed from their appropriate boltzmann equations . building on these models , morlino et al . ( 2012a , b ) have confirmed what had been suspected earlier ( smith et al . 1994 ; hester et al . 1994 ; sollerman et al . 2003 ) , namely that the broadening of the narrow component beyond the expected ism value ( @xmath1025 - 30 kms@xmath26 instead of 10 kms@xmath26 ) is most likey due to heating in a cosmic ray precursor . in particular , morlino et al . ( 2012 ) found that the characteristic charge exchange length of the incoming neutrals exceeds that of the neutrals crossing back upstream , so that the narrow component width is impacted not by the neutral return flux , but rather by heating in the cosmic ray precursor . raymond et al . ( 2011 ) predicted a similar broadening of the narrow component , though they focused mainly on the contribution of collisional excitation in the precursor to the flux in the narrow h@xmath48 component . spatially resolved line broadening of the narrow h@xmath48 component was detected in ground - based longslit spectroscopy of knot g in tycho ( lee et al . in addition , a small ramp - up in h@xmath48 emission was observed ahead of knot g in hst imagery tycho s snr ( lee et al . 2010 ) . the results , taken together , are strong evidence for the presence of cosmic ray precursors in balmer - dominated snrs . one prediction of the new balmer - dominated shock models is the existence of a third component of the h@xmath48 emission ( morlino et al . 2012a , b ) . when the hot neutrals escape upstream , they undergo charge exchange with the colder preshock protons . this results in fast protons with cold neutrals , with the former rapidly equilibrating with preshock protons and pre - heating the gas . the temperature of the equilibrated protons in the precursor lies between the temperature of the far upstream protons ( @xmath105000 k ) and the far downstream protons ( @xmath10 10@xmath70 - 10@xmath71 k ) , typically @xmath1010@xmath72 k. further charge exchange between these warm protons and the preshock neutrals gives rise to a third , warm neutral component ( neither fast nor slow ) having velocity widths of hundreds of kms@xmath26(morlino et al . interestingly , the presence of a third h@xmath48 component was first observationally reported by smith et al . ( 1994 ) in their high resolution echelle spectroscopy of balmer - dominated snrs in the large magellanic cloud ( an example of one of the spectra from smith et al . ( 1994 ) is reproduced in figure [ fig:0509_3rdhalphacomp ] ) . a third h@xmath48 component was also reported in high resolution spectra of knot g in tycho s snr ( ghavamian et al . 2000 ) . in their models of balmer - dominated shock emission , morlino et al . ( 2012a ) found that the importance of the third component relative to that of the broad and narrow components depends strongly on the preshock neutral fraction and @xmath16 , in line with earlier theoretical predictions on properties of a fast neutral precursor ( smith et al . the fact that the third component has been detected in tycho s snr ( width @xmath10150 kms@xmath26 ) is consistent with the high preshock neutral fraction ( @xmath730.9 ) inferred from the broad - to - narrow ratio of knot g by ghavamian et al . a similar third component may have been detected in high resolution spectra of snr [email protected] , where measurement of the narrow component width required the inclusion of an additiona component of width 75 kms@xmath26 ( smith et al . 1994 ) . the new fast neutral precursor models predict that a substantial fraction of the h@xmath48 excitation in balmer - dominated shocks can arise ahead of the shock , where warm neutrals are excited by electron impact . interestingly , the relative contribution of the preshock h@xmath48 to the total ( upstream + downstream ) is sensitive to @xmath16 behind the shock . morlino et al . ( 2012a ) found that up to 40% of the total h@xmath48 flux from a balmer - dominated shock can arise from the fast neutral precursor when @xmath39@xmath102500 kms@xmath26 and @xmath16=1 both upstream and downstream . in these models the preshock contribution to the total flux drops substantially for lower downstream equilibrations for @xmath39@xmath581000 kms@xmath26 ( the slowest shocks considered by morlino et al . this is generally consistent with the fact that in most cases , shock models not including the precursor h@xmath48 emission have been able to match the observed broad - to - narrow ratios . in other words , if the postshock temperature equilibration were not low for such fast shocks , the agreement between the observed and predicted @xmath55would have been substantially worse for such remnants as tycho s snr and sn 1006 . sn 1006 is an example of a snr accessible to uv spectroscopy due to its galactic location , 450 pc up from the galactic plane , and therefore with relatively low extinction due to intervening dust and gas . the hopkins ultraviolet telescope ( hut ) observed the uv resonance lines of he ii @xmath431640 , c iv @xmath441548 , 1550 , n v @xmath441238,1243 , and o vi @xmath431032 , 1038 ( raymond et al . 1995 ) emitted from the balmer dominated filament in the nw quadrant . the line showed doppler broadening consistent with that of the h @xmath48 broad component observed in the optical , indicating insignificant ion - ion equilibration . laming et al . ( 1996 ) were also able to infer the degree of electron - ion equilibration at the shock . -0.2 in he ii @xmath431640 , by virtue of its relatively high excitation potential @xmath10 48 ev ) , is excited only by electrons , and its intensity is therefore directly related to the electron temperature . c iv @xmath441548 , 1550 , n v @xmath441238,1243 , and o vi @xmath431032 , 1038 , by contrast , have much lower excitation potentials of @xmath74 and 12 ev , so although these ionization states are established by electrons , the line emission in these transitions can also be excited by impacts with hot protons and @xmath48 particles , and the intensity ratio of he ii @xmath431640 to c iv @xmath441548 , 1550 , n v @xmath441238,1243 , and o vi @xmath431032 , 1038 can be sensitive to the post - shock electron - proton temperature equilibration . the spatial distribution of the uv resonance line emission , when spatially resolved , provides additional constraints on the degree of electron - ion equilibration at the shock front . for shocks slower than 1500 kms@xmath26 , @xmath75 at the shock front results in both a more rapid rise and higher maximum in emissivity of the uv resonance lines with distance behind the shock ( see figure [ fig : ovispatial ] ) . laming et al . ( 1996 ) calculated impact excitation cross sections for protons and @xmath48 particles colliding with li - like ions , using a partial wave expansion with the coulomb - bethe approximation , and applying a unitarization procedure following seaton ( 1964 ) . they found a degree of equilibration of order @xmath76 or less , which implied for a 2250 km s@xmath26 shock an electron temperature immediately postshock of @xmath77 k , in very good agreement ( and actually predating ) the optical results discussed above in subsection 4.1 . the ion - ion equilibration in sn 1006 was revisited by korreck et al.(2004 ) , using higher spectral resolution fuse data comprising o vi @xmath431032 , 1038 and the broad ly @xmath781025 emission lines . they found a slightly broader line profile in ly @xmath52 , implying less than mass - proportional heating and possibly a small degree of ion - ion equilibration . sn 1987a represents another sn / snr in a region of the sky accessible to uv observations . hst cos observed the he ii @xmath431640 , c iv @xmath441548 , 1550 , n v @xmath441238,1243 and n iv @xmath441486 lines emitted from the reverse shock ( france et al . when combined with optical spectroscopy of h @xmath48 , the @xmath16 ratio at the shock is determined to be in the range 0.14 0.35 , significantly higher than similar ratios coming from balmer dominated forward shocks . france et al . ( 2011 ) argued that a different equilibration mechanism is likely at work . considering the relative youth of sn 1987a , and the fact that the reverse shock is the origin of the emission , significant populations of cosmic rays and associated magnetic field amplification are unlikely . in fact , in the expanding ejecta the magnetic field is likely to be very weak , leading to a very high aflvn mach number shock . as will be discussed below in connection with shocks in galaxy clusters , electron heating in such a case is likely to be due to acceleration in the cross - shock potential . the cross - shock potential is effective at heating electrons , and so may explain the higher @xmath16 in sn 1987a . the forward shock of sn 1987a has also been observed in x - rays with the grating instruments on chandra ( e.g. zhekov et al . 2009 ) . in general electron heating well below complete equilibration is seen , though precise interpretation is difficult because one observation sees emission from shocks at a variety of different velocities , due to irregularities in the density of the surrounding medium . the inverse relationship between the temperature equilibration and shock speed is an interesting result from studies of balmer - dominated snrs . however , the applicability of this result to both fully ionized shocks and shocks undergoing efficient cr acceleration ( @xmath5850% of their energy transferred to crs ) remains unsettled . recently , vink et al . ( 2010 ) used a two - fluid - model for cosmic rays and thermal gas to simulate the effect of cosmic ray acceleration on the temperature and ionization structure of fast , non - relativistic shocks . they found that if 5% of the shock energy were to be channeled into cosmic rays ( the minimum needed if snrs are the dominant source of cosmic rays ) then approximately 30% of the postshock pressure must reside in cosmic rays ( corresponding to a ratio of cosmic ray to total postshock pressure , w , of 0.3 ) . for w=0.3 , vink et al . ( 2010 ) predicted a lowering of the average temperature of the postshock gas to @xmath1070% of the value when the cosmic ray contribution is ignored . this is a significant alteration of the postshock temperature profile , and should result in much more rapid equilibration of electrons and protons close to the shock . however , do the effects described above actually occur in snr shocks ? one of the principle lines of evidence cited by vink et al . ( 2010 ) in support of this picture was the result found in rcw 86 by helder et al . ( 2009 ) . in that snr , the broad h@xmath48 widths of balmer - dominated filaments were found to be nearly 50% smaller than the minimum allowed given their x - ray proper motions . filaments in the ne of the snr exhibited broad h@xmath48 widths of 1000 kms@xmath26 , but their apparent x - ray counterparts , which exhibited strong x - ray synchrotron ( nonthermal ) emission , exhibited proper motions indicating shock speeds of 3000 - 6000 kms@xmath26 . this result , along with the theoretical prediction that x - ray synchrotron emission requires shock speeds of at least 2000 kms@xmath26 ( aharonian et al . 1999 ) was taken by helder et al . ( 2009 ) and vink et al . ( 2010 ) as evidence for substantial energy loss ( [email protected] ) from the balmer - dominated shocks to cosmic rays . however , this association has now been refuted by subsequent multi - epoch optical imagery of the h@xmath48 filaments , which have failed to show the kind of high proper motions seen in the nonthermal x - ray filaments ( helder et al . 2012 , in preparation ) . instead , they show proper motions consistent with shock speeds predicted by the broad h@xmath48 widths without energy loss to cosmic rays(@xmath10600 - 1200 kms@xmath26 ) , implying that [email protected] . the association between the balmer - dominated shocks studied spectroscopically by helder et al . ( 2009 ) and the x - ray filaments was due either to coincidental spatial alignment , or due to sudden deceleration of the outer shock in rcw 86 during its encounter with the surrounding cavity wall ( williams et al . 2011 ; helder et al . 2012 , in preparation ) . -1.2 in the lack of association between the balmer - dominated filaments and the non - thermal x - ray filaments in rcw 86 raises some important questions about the feasibility of using balmer - dominated shocks to study electron - proton equilibration in cases where 50% or more of the thermal energy is diverted to cosmic rays . in snrs such as sn 1006 ( koyama et al . 1996 ; katsuda et al . 2010a ) , tycho s snr ( warren et al . 2005 ; katsuda et al . 2010b ) , cas a ( vink & laming 2003 ) and rx j1713.7@xmath563946 ( koyama et al . 1997 ; slane et al . 1999 ; tanaka et al . 2008 ) the presence of strong synchrotron x - ray filaments has been interpreted as evidence for highly efficient cosmic ray acceleration . the narrowness of the synchrotron filaments most likely reflects the short emitting lifetimes of the ultra high energy electrons ( energies @xmath1010 - 100 tev ) as they spiral in the postshock magnetic field ( vink & laming 2003 ) . the detection of @xmath80-ray emission from the shells of sn 1006 ( acero et al . 2010 ) and rx j1713.7@xmath563946 ( aharonian et al . 2006 ; abdo et al . 2011 ) has shown that cosmic rays are accelerated to energies as high as 100 tev in these snrs . in all cases thermal x - ray emission has been exceptionally faint due to the very low inferred preshock densities ( @xmath570.1 @xmath29 ) , making it more likely that the overall x - ray emission will be dominated by synchrotron radiation from the most energetic cosmic rays . snrs expanding into such low density media can propagate at the high shock speeds required for cosmic ray acceleration ( @xmath582000 kms@xmath26 ; aharonian et al . 1999 ) for a longer time , allowing their structure to become modified by the back pressure from the cosmic rays . investigating the temperature and ionization structure of such shocks with balmer line spectroscopy requires finding balmer - dominated shocks exhibiting x - ray synchrotron radiation . all of the known snrs exhibiting balmer - dominated shocks have also been imaged at x - ray wavelengths with _ chandra _ or xmm , allowing reasonably detailed searches for shocks emitting both h@xmath48 and synchrotron x - ray emission ( the latter producing hard continuum that is dominant at energies of 2 kev and higher ) . a detailed comparison for all balmer - dominated snrs has not yet been published . however , even a cursory comparison between the narrowband h@xmath48 and hard x - ray images of these snrs shows a distinct _ anticorrelation _ between shocks emitting in these two bands . for example , overlaying h@xmath48 and _ chandra _ images of tycho s snr acquired during the same epoch ( 2007 ) ( figure [ fig : tycho_balmer ] ) shows little or no correlation between the prominent balmer - dominated filaments on the eastern and northeastern edges and the non - thermal x - ray filaments ( e@xmath543 kev ) circling the remnant . the balmer - dominated filaments ( shown in red in figure [ fig : tycho_balmer ] ) on the eastern side of tycho s snr are seen projected 30@xmath69 - 1@xmath64 inside the edge of the nonthermal x - ray filaments ( marked in green ) , an indication that portion of the shell along the line of sight has significantly decelerated . the balmer filaments are seen at the outermost edge of the thermally emitting x - ray ejecta ( marked in blue ) , but only at locations where little or no nonthermal x - ray emission is present . the bright optical filament known as knot g ( at the far left edge of figure [ fig : tycho_balmer ] ) is the only location where balmer filaments and x - ray synchrotron emission appear coincident . however , upon closer inspection the anticorrelation between the balmer line and synchrotron emission can be seen in knot g as well : the upper half of the filament , where balmer line emission is strongest , exhibits minimal synchrotron emission , while the opposite is true in the lower half of the filament . the enhanced nonthermal emission inside of knot g may be due to the strong recent deceleration of knot g , where the snr is currently propagating into a strong density gradient at the outermost edge of an h i cloud ( ghavamian et al . the lack of optical / x - ray synchrotron correlation is especially striking given that the balmer - dominated filaments in tycho s snr have a high enough shock velocity ( @xmath101800 - 2100 kms@xmath26 ) to accelerate particles to tev energies . the anticorrelation between the optical and nonthermal x - ray emission can be observed in other snrs as well , including sn 1006 , where recently x - ray proper motions have been measured along the entire rim by katsuda et al . ( 2012 ) . as with tycho s snr , the locations of the balmer - dominated filaments and the nonthermal x - ray filaments along the nw rim of sn 1006 are mutually exclusive . instead , the balmer - dominated shocks are closely associated with thermal x - ray filaments having a proper motion consistent with a shock velocity of 3300@xmath65200@xmath65300 kms@xmath26 ( statistical and registrational uncertainties , respectively ) for a distance of 2.2 kpc . this result is in excellent agreement with the shock velocity of 2890@xmath65100 kms@xmath26 determined from the broad h@xmath48 width and broad - to - narrow ratio of the nw filament by ghavamian et al . such close agreement is a strong indication that little substantial energy has been lost from the thermal plasma to cosmic ray acceleration , similar to optical proper motion studies from rcw 86 ( helder et al . , in preparation ) . from the above discussion it appears that balmer - dominated snrs , while offering powerful diagnostics of @xmath16 and @xmath39 , are not useful for investigating equilibration the extreme cases of strongly cosmic - ray modified shocks . in fact , the very condition allowing for the detection of the balmer line emission - presence of neutral gas ahead of the shock - is also responsible for limiting the fraction of shock energy lost to cosmic ray acceleration . quantatitive evaluations of this effect by drury et al . ( 1996 ) and reville et al . ( 2007 ) show that when the preshock gas is significantly neutral , alfvn waves driven by the cosmic rays ahead of the shock are dissipated by ion - neutral damping . as long as the charge exchange frequency , @xmath81 ( @xmath82 ) is larger than the alfvn wave frequency , @xmath83 ( @xmath84 ) the ions and neutrals oscillate coherently , and ion - neutral damping is not important . however , when @xmath85 the neutrals are left behind by the ions in the alfvn wave motion , and during the incoherent oscillation between the two , charge exchange exerts a drag on the alfvn waves , damping them . the condition required for alfvn waves to not be strongly damped in the precursor can be written out as @xmath86 where @xmath87 is the alfvn speed of the ions ahead of the shock and @xmath88 is the preshock neutral density . given that cosmic rays resonantly scatter off alfvn waves having doppler shifted frequencies comparable to their gyrofrequency , and that the cosmic ray gyrofrequency is related to its energy via @xmath89 , the inequality above can be cast in terms of the energy , @xmath90 , below which a significant fraction of the cosmic ray flux out of the shock is reduced by ion - neutral damping : @xmath91 where we have set @xmath928.4@xmath9310@xmath94 @xmath95 s@xmath26 ( kulsrud & cesarsky 1971 ) , @xmath96 is the preshock magnetic field strength in units of 3 @xmath12 , @xmath15 and @xmath97 are the total preshock density and neutral fraction , and @xmath98 is the preshock temperature in units of 10@xmath99 k. for balmer - dominated snrs , where recent models have required moderate amplification of the preshock magnetic field ( @xmath1003 - 5 ; ghavamian et al . 2007 ) and where the preshock temperature may exceed 20,000 k ( raymond et al . 2011 ) , @xmath1014 tev for the typical case where @xmath1020.5 @xmath29 . snrs exhibiting nonthermal x - ray emission are believed to contain cosmic rays with energies of tens of tev , so @xmath1034 tev is certainly high enough reduce the effectiveness of balmer - dominated shocks in producing nonthermal x - ray emission . however , as noted earlier , a modest back pressure from cosmic rays is required to explain the width of the h@xmath48 narrow component line , as well as the low broad - to - narrow ratios seen in some snrs ( rakowski et al . 2009 ; raymond et al . in fact , one model for electron heating in fast collisionless shocks requires at least some feedback from the cosmic rays in order to explain the moderate heating of electrons in snrs , as well as the inverse squared relationship between @xmath16 and @xmath39 ( ghavamian et al . 2007 , described in the next section ) . furthermore , as pointed out by drury et al . ( 1996 ) , the ion - neutral damping of alfvn waves in the precursor is unimportant for cosmic rays which have already exceeded @xmath90 . since the acceleration time for cosmic rays shortens considerably with shock speed ( @xmath104 ; malkov & drury 2001 ) , the fastest balmer - dominated shocks are more likely to have accelerated particles beyond @xmath90 and hence will begin to exhibit nonthermal x - ray emission and cosmic - ray modified shock structure . a good example is the aforementioned snr [email protected] , where the shock speeds exceed 5000 kms@xmath26 ( helder , kosenko & vink 2010 ) and nonthermal x - ray emission from cosmic ray accelerated electrons is detected from the forward shock . the forward shocks in more evolved balmer - dominated snrs ( such as sn 1006 and tycho s snr ) will have swept up more mass and slowed down to speeds @xmath572000 kms@xmath26 , by which point @xmath105 will have lengthened and the shocks will be less cosmic - ray dominated . given the lack of in situ measurements of the particle distributions in snrs , the electron heating mechanisms in these shocks have been studied primarily via numerical methods . on one hand , a number of studies have focused on electron heating in relativistic shocks , with the aim of modeling high energy emission from gamma - ray bursts ( e.g. , gedalin et al . 2008 ; sironi & spitkovsky 2011 ) . these shocks are in a different area of parameter space than the snr shocks discussed here , and the physics governing the electron heating in relativistic shocks is substantially different . at the very high alfvnic mach numbers characteristic of gamma - ray bursts , the shock transition becomes very thin ( less than an electron gyroradius ) . electrons in this case may be once again accelerated by the cross shock potential , similar to the very low mach number case . on the other hand , a number of other studies consider non - relativistic shocks relevant to snrs ( @xmath570.01c ) , where accelerated particles such as cosmic rays or solar energetic particles ( seps ) may play an important role in establishing their shock structure . these studies have sought to identify plasma waves capable of boosting electrons to mildly relativistic energies ( e.g. , amano & hoshino 2010 ; riquelme & spitkovsky 2011 ) , with the objective of understanding how electrons are injected into the cosmic ray acceleration process . this is a different ( though related ) question from what we consider here , namely how electrons are promptly heated to temperatures @xmath105@xmath9310@xmath70 k at the shock front ( ghavamian et al . 2007 ; rakowski et al . 2008 ) . this limits our consideration of the work done so far to two broad scenarios of electron heating in fast , non - relativistic collisionless shocks . one scenario is based on lower hybrid wave heating in the cosmic ray precursor ( laming 2000 ; ghavamian et al . 2007 ; rakowski et al . 2008 ) while the other is based on counterstreaming instabilities ahead of the shock ( e.g. , the buneman instability , cargill & papadapoulos ( 1988 ) , matsukiyo 2010 ; dieckmann et al . we discuss these mechanisms below in turn . the most significant result of the balmer - dominated shock studies , the inverse squared relation between @xmath16 and @xmath39 , places a useful constraint on the range of plausible equilibration mechanisms at the shock front . the simplest way to obtain @xmath16@xmath106 is to set @xmath107 at shock speeds of 400 kms@xmath26 and higher , while allowing @xmath1 to rise according to the rankine - hugoniot jump conditions , @xmath108 . the requirement that @xmath16=1 at @xmath39=400 kms@xmath26 gives @xmath1090.3 kev for @xmath39@xmath54400 kms@xmath26 , independent of shock velocity ( ghavamian et al . although there may be marginal evidence of a departure from this relation at shock speeds exceeding 2000 kms@xmath26 ( van adelsberg et al . 2008 ) , a velocity - independent heating of electrons in snr shocks is an important clue to the nature of plasma heating processes in fast collisionless shocks . it suggests that plasma processes ahead of the shock front are an important ( if not dominant ) source of electron heating in snrs ( ghavamian et al . 2007 ; rakowski et al . 2009 ) . as mentioned earlier , strong interstellar shocks are expected to form a precursor where cosmic rays crossing upstream give rise to alfvn waves and turbulence ( blandford & eichler 1987 ; jones & ellison 1991 ) , compressing and pre - heating the gas before it enters the shock . as long as the shock is strong ( @xmath1101/4 ) and cosmic ray pressure does not dominate the postshock pressure ( @xmath111b / b does not greatly exceed unity , with @xmath5720% of the postshock pressure provided by cosmic rays ) the thermal heating within the precursor does not depend strongly on shock velocity . the limited range of narrow component h@xmath48 widths observed in balmer - dominated snrs over a wide range in shock speeds ( sollerman et al . 2003 ; raymond et al . 2011 ) is consistent with the relative insensitivity of the preshock heating to shock speed . since the widening of the h@xmath48 narrow component line is now believed to arise in a precursor where the gas is heated by the damping of cosmic - ray driven waves ( wagner et al . 2008 ; raymond et al . 2011 ; morlino et al . 2012 ) , it stands to reason that perhaps the physical processes generating a constant electron heating with shock speed ( @xmath1090.3 kev ) also originate within the cosmic ray precursor . the above argument was used by ghavamian et al . ( 2007 ) and rakowski et al . ( 2008 ) to advocate for a heating model where lower hybrid waves within the cosmic ray precursor preheat electrons to a constant temperature before they enter the shock front . this model was based on the conception of mcclements et al . ( 1997 ) , who suggested that lower hybrid waves driven by the reflected population of nonthermal ions could generate lower hybrid waves ahead of the shock , pre - heating electrons and injecting them into the cosmic ray acceleration process . the condition for generating such waves is that the shock be quasi - perpendicular , and that the reflected ions form a beam - like ( gyrotropic ) distibution . a similar scenario was suggested by ghavamian et al . ( 2007 ) and rakowski et al . ( 2008 ) , but with one crucial difference : the reflected particles considered are ultra - relativistic cosmic rays rather than suprathermal ions . the lower hybrid waves are electrostatic ion waves which propagate perpendicular to the magnetic field and whose frequency is the geometric mean of the electron and ion geofrequencies , @xmath112 . the group velocity of these waves is directed primarily along the magnetic field lines ( @xmath113 ; laming 2001 ) and the waves can simultaneously resonate with ions moving across the field lines and electrons moving along the field lines . although the growth rate of lower hybrid waves is generally small ( rakowski et al . 2008 ) , their group velocity perpendicular to the magnetic field ( and hence the shock front ) can be on the order of the shock velocity ( @xmath114@xmath39 ) . this allows the lower hybrid waves to remain in contact with the shock for long periods of time , attaining high intensities capable of effectively heating the electrons ( mcclements et al . 1997 ; ghavamian et al . 2007 ) . in the case of cosmic rays , the time spent by the electrons in the precursor is @xmath115 . the kinetic energy acquired by the electrons in the precursor is @xmath116 , where @xmath117 is the momentum diffusion coefficient of electrons ( ghavamian et al . 2007 ) . for lower hybrid wave turbulence , @xmath118 ( karney 1978 ; ghavamian et al . 2007 ; rakowski et al . 2008 ) , so that @xmath119 , as needed to account for the inverse squared relationship between equilibration and shock speed . note that under the assumption that nonlinear amplification of the preshock magnetic field is not too strong ( @xmath120 ) , @xmath121 is that of bohm diffusion , which scales as 1/b , so that @xmath122 is also approximately independent of b. during the past decade more refined models of cosmic ray acceleration have shown that a non - resonant mode of alfvn waves , having a higher growth rate than the previously considered resonant mode ( skilling 1975 ) , can be excited by cosmic rays in the precursor ( bell & lucek 2001 , bell 2004 , 2005 ) . unlike for the resonant case , the non - resonant amplification allows for @xmath123 , driving preshock magnetic fields to values as high as 1 mg ( vink & laming 2003 ; berezhko et al . 2003 ; bamba et al . 2005 ; ballet 2006 ) . such magnetic fields are hundreds of times stronger than the canonical preshock magnetic field of 3 @xmath12 and high enough to account for the observed narrowness of x - ray synchrotron - emitting rims in such snrs as sn 1006 ( assuming the narrowness is due to rapid cooling of high energy electrons behind the shock ; see ballet 2006 and morlino et al . additional studies have suggested that non - resonant amplification may dominate early in the life of the snr , while resonant amplification may take over during the sedov - taylor stage of evolution ( amato & blasi 2009 ; schure et al . 2012 ) , though in either case , @xmath12410 is readily attained . such a strong magnetic field effectively reduces the acceleration time for particles , and is very well suited for explaining how cosmic rays can reach the knee in the cosmic ray spectrum near 10@xmath125 ev ( bell & lucek 2001 ; eriksen et al . 2011 ) . an important factor influencing the effectiveness of lower hybrid wave heating of electrons is the orientation of the preshock magnetic field relative to the shock front . lower hybrid wave heating is only effective in perpendicular shocks ( vink & laming 2003 , ghavamian et al . 2007 ; rakowski et al . given their spherical global geometry , snr blast waves generally propagate at a range of angles to the interstellar magnetic field . x - ray observations and models of such snrs as sn 1006 ( orlando et al . 2007 ; petruk et al . 2008 ) have indicated that perpendicular shocks are far more effective at accelerating cosmic rays than parallel shocks . although the detailed implications of such differences have not yet been worked out for the lower hybrid wave heating model , rakowski et al . ( 2008 ) argue that even for quasi - parallel shock geometries the cosmic ray current driving the nonresonant alfvn waves will generate a significant perpendicular magnetic field ahead of the shock ( such a possibility has also been inferred from numerical simulations ; riquelme & spitkovsky 2011 ) . this would allow lower hybrid wave growth to overtake modified alfvn wave growth for arbitrary orientations of the far upstream magnetic field , and allow for a more ubiquitous role for lower hybrid wave heating of electrons . the amplification of the preshock magnetic field well beyond its far upstream value introduces an interesting possibility : effective lowering of the alfvnic ( and hence magnetosonic ) mach number of the shock . for the balmer - dominated shocks , where analysis of the optical spectra has shown that at best only a moderate fraction ( @xmath5720% ) of the shock energy has likely been channeled into cosmic rays , the widening of the h@xmath48 narrow component has been interpreted as nonthermal broadening caused by the lowest frequency waves in the precursor ( ghavamian et al . 2007 ; though see raymond et al ( 2011 ) for a thermal intepretation ) . to explain the 30 - 50 kms@xmath26 widths of the h@xmath48 narrow component , the preshock magnetic field must be enhanced by a factor of a few . for the non - resonant alfvn waves in the bell ( 2004 ) mechanism , the magnetic field energy density immediately behind the shock is given by ( schure et al . 2012 ) @xmath126 where @xmath127 is the fraction of the shock ram pressure channeled into cosmic rays . solving this expression for b gives @xmath128 , where @xmath129 is the shock speed in units of 1000 kms@xmath26 . for @xmath1300.1 - 0.2 , @xmath451 @xmath29 , a postshock compression factor of 4 and balmer - dominated shock speeds @xmath102000 kms@xmath26 , this gives @xmath1314 - 10 ahead of the shock . correspondingly , @xmath132 can increase by nearly the same factor , so that @xmath133 can be reduced by as much as an order of magnitude . treumann & jaroschek ( 2008 ) describe the physical picture in this case as that of the shock having to prevent an increasing number of ions from crossing the shock jump by deflecting an increasing number of them at higher and higher mach numbers . this deflection is necessary so that the ability of the shock to dissipate the inflowing energy is not overwhelmed . by deflecting these ions back upstream into a precursor , the net inflow of momentum and energy density into the shock is reduced , reducing the net difference in velocity between the inflowing and outflowing ions . this effectively reduces the mach number in the frame of the upstream medium . note that the ions in the precursor are only mildly compressed ( wagner et al . 2008 ; morlino et al . 2012 ) , which only weakly counteracts the rise in b. in addition , @xmath132 only scales as @xmath134 , but scales directly as b. the result is that _ given the compelling evidence for enhanced preshock magnetic fields in snrs shocks , the mach numbers of these shocks may be overestimated by as much as an order of magnitude . _ as we describe in section [ sec:5 ] , a unified description of solar wind and snr shocks , where the physics of electron - ion temperature equilibration occurs over a similar range in mach numbers and involves a similar range of physical processes , may be possible . similar to the lower hybrid wave model , the buneman instability - driven wave model focuses on the region immediately ahead of a quasi - perpendicular shock . however , unlike the lower hybrid wave model , the buneman instability models consider the reflected nonthermal ion distribution , rather than ultrarelativistic cosmic rays . in the latter model , @xmath1020% of the ions are reflected backstream against the incoming electron and ion plasma ( papadapoulos 1988 ; cargill & papadapoulos 1988 ) . here the upstream plasma is not electrically neutral due to the positive charge of the reflected ion distribution . in such cases , a drift is induced between the electrons and ions . the microinstabilities excited by this configuration depend upon the relative size of the electron thermal speed relative to the electron - ion drift velocity . the buneman instability occurs when the drift velocity of the reflected ions relative to the upstream electrons exceeds the thermal speed of the upstream electrons ( @xmath135)(cargill & papadapoulos 1988 ) , a condition which occurs for very high mach number ( @xmath13650 ) shocks . if the reflected ion current upstream is strong enough , the electron current generated to counteract it may produce a large enough drift between the preshock ions and electrons to cause a secondary buneman instability when the ion speed exceeds the electron thermal speed ( dieckmann et al . the buneman instability generates electrostatic plasma waves which damp by rapidly heating the preshock electrons to @xmath137 kev , where @xmath138 is the shock speed in units of 1000 kms@xmath26 . until their thermal speed matches the electron - ion drift speed , at which point the instability saturates . the rapid heating of the electrons perpendicular to the magnetic field results in @xmath1391 and makes it possible for an ion acoustic instability to occur between the preshock electrons and either the reflected ions or preshock ions ( cargill & papdapoulos 1988 ) . the waves generated by the ion acoustic instability can then transfer a substantial fraction of the shock energy ( tens of percent ) into electron thermal energy . this process occurs over a length scale of @xmath140 ( as opposed to @xmath141 for the cosmic ray precursor ) , resulting in a @[email protected] , independent of shock speed . _ this is in strong disagreement with the equilibrations obtained for the balmer - dominated shocks . _ a number of other electron heating mechanisms , such as the modified two - stream instability and electron - cyclotron drift instability , have been proposed for collisionless shocks based on results from particle in cell ( pic ) simulations ( umeda et al . 2012a , 2012b ) . a unified picture proposed by matsukiyo ( 2010 ) suggests that electrons can be strongly energized at low mach numbers ( @xmath14210 ) via a modified two - stream instability , where the velocities of the reflected / incoming ions and the electrons are lower than the thermal speed of the electrons and the electrons are able to damp out the buneman instability . in this case , obliquely propagating whistler mode waves are excited , having frequencies between the electron cyclotron frequency and the lower hybrid wave frequency . when the electron - ion drift velocity and electron thermal speed become nearly equal , the electron - cyclotron drift instability becomes important ( umeda et al . 2012a ) , exciting waves with frequencies that are multiples of the electron cyclotron frequency . at higher mach numbers the electron thermal speed is lower than that of the ions , and the buneman instability / ion acoustic wave process descrbied earlier is predicted to take over . the amount of electron heating predicted by the buneman instability / ion acoustic wave model scales as @xmath143 ( cargill & papadapoulos 1988 ; matsukiyo 2010 ) , so that for shocks in the 2000 kms@xmath26 - 10,000 kms@xmath26 range , @xmath1442 - 50 kev . this is clearly at odds with @xmath1450.3 kev observed between 400 kms@xmath26 and 2000 kms@xmath26 for balmer - dominated shocks . one explanation for this discrepancy is that growth of the buneman - like and two - stream instabilities described above requires that the reflected ions form a distribution function with a positive gradient at some velocity ( laming 2000 ) . this distribution forms when specularly reflected ions have a mostly monoenergetic , beamlike configuration . at the low mach numbers in the solar wind ( @xmath5710 ) , where the shock structure is laminar , the reflected ions closely resemble a monoenergetic beam . however , at the higher mach numbers , where the shock front is more turbulent and disordered , the reflected ions are likely to have a greater spread in energy and are probably less beamlike ( laming 2000 ) . this would lead to suppression of buneman - like instabilities . however , this line of reasoning is still speculative , and the real explanation for the lack of agreement between the observed @xmath16 and those predicted by models in this section remains to be explored . cosmic - ray driven processes may ultimately provide a better explanation for electron heating at snr shocks than those involving reflected suprathermal ions . the cross shock potential arises from the charge separation produced by the different gyroradii for ions and electrons as they cross the shock transition . it accelerates electrons into the post shock layer , and can be a means of electron heating at subcritical shocks with an approximately laminar structure . at supercritical shocks , the time dependence and non - locality introduced reduces the degree of electron heating . however at sufficiently alfvn mach number ( where the shock transition becomes thin ( on the order of the electron convective gyroradius or inertial length ) , significant electron heating may again occur . in the absence of magnetic field amplification by cosmic rays , this might be expected to happen at snr shocks . however it is much more likely in environments where the plasma beta is low , such as galaxy clusters . it may also occur in cases where a significant population of cosmic rays is unlikely due to the low age of the shock , as in gamma - ray bursts . from the beginning , a detailed study of the fastest collisionless shocks has been hampered by one inherent limitation : they occur in objects which are too remote for in situ study . although some collisionless shocks in our solar system reach alfvnic mach numbers as high as 30 ( such as those around saturn ; achilleos et al . 2006 ; masters et al . 2011 ) , there are no physical phenomena in our solar system energetic enough to produce the type of shocks seen in snrs ( mach numbers @xmath10100 or more if no preshock magnetic field enhancement in the cr is assumed ) . in addition , the range of plasma betas attainable in the solar system is larger than the range of plasma betas attained in the interstellar medium . another fundamental difference between solar wind and snr shocks is the fact that the former are short - lived phenomena confined to small spatial scales ( millions of km ) in a curved ( bow shock ) geometry , whereas the latter are sustained for thousands of years , on spatial scales of parsecs , often well - described by a planar geometry . this results in an irreducible difference between the two types of shocks : particles crossing back and forth between upstream and downstream can remain in contact with snr shocks for long periods of time , allowing accelerated crs to acquire much more energy in snr shocks than in solar wind shocks . this potentially allows the crs to create shock precursors with properties needed to heat electrons and influence @xmath16 . the heating of electrons at the earth s and other planetary bow shocks has been the subject of much theoretical and observational work . typical features of the electron temperature change , @xmath146 , observed at the bow shock as observed by @xcite include ( a ) an approximate relationship between heating and the incident solar wind energy @xmath147 , where @xmath148 is the component of the solar wind s velocity incident upon the shock , and ( b ) a relationship between the change in temperature normalized by the incident energy and the fast magnetosonic mach number , @xmath149 . a similar approximate relationship holds between the normalized electron temperature change and the alfvn mach number @xmath133 , especially for shocks with a low plasma @xmath52 , which is the ratio between thermal and magnetic pressures . recent work by @xcite shows that this relationship with @xmath133 holds well at saturn s bow shock . this is particularly interesting as @xmath133 at saturn is often much larger than at earth . in figure [ fig : combined ] we plot the ratio of electron and ion temperatures downstream of the shock against the magnetosonic , and alfvn mach numbers , as well as the upstream flow velocity relative to the shock . the data in these figures are taken from bow shock crossings of the isee spacecraft , and is a subset of those listed in @xcite , consisting of 61 crossings for which all the necessary data is available . it is well known that quantities other than those displayed here may be more appropriate , specifically the change in electron temperature over the change in total temperature @xmath150 or even @xmath151 are better correlated with inverse mach numbers than @xmath152 @xcite . nevertheless , we use the latter quantity here as it enables a comparison with data from extra - solar system and outer planetary shocks at where less data are available . furthermore , the approximate inverse dependence upon @xmath8 , @xmath133 , and @xmath39 is still quite apparent in this data . it is interesting to note that the relationship with the mach numbers is much more favourable than the dependence upon @xmath39 , indicating that the mach number is the more relevant quantity for organizing the relationship between @xmath16 and shock strength . is plotted versus shock speed ( left ) , alfvnic mach number ( center ) and magnetosonic mach number ( right ) . green symbols show data from crossings of earth s bow shock ( @xcite ) , while the black symbols show data from crossings of saturn s bow shock ( @xcite ) . shock speeds for the saturnian bow shock are based on a solar wind model and an assumed shock speed with respect to the spacecraft of 100 kms@xmath26 , and ion temperatures are based on electron distribution measurements and the application of the rankine - hugoniot conditions ( see masters et al . ( 2011 ) for a full discussion of shock parameter derivations at saturn s bow shock ) . red symbols show data acquired from balmer - dominated snr shocks ( van adelsberg et al . 2008 ) , and assume @xmath132=9 kms@xmath26 , @xmath153=11 kms@xmath26 . , title="fig:",width=480 ] -.5 in many mechanisms may be involved in the heating of electrons in solar system shocks . proposed mechanisms involve acceleration of electrons by a cross - shock potential @xcite , wave turbulence @xcite , microinstabilities @xcite , and electron trajectory scattering @xcite . the existence of a cross - shock potential may be deduced from the generalized ohm s law in which a gradient in electron thermal pressure gives rise to an electric field . examining the energetics of electrons crossing the shock may simplified by working in the de hoffmann - teller frame of reference @xcite , defined as the frame in which the shock is at rest , and in which the magnetic field and plasma flow velocity are ( anti-)parallel . in this case the the electric field is dominated by that generated by the electron pressure gradient , and the work done on electrons crossing the shock is determined by the cross - shock potential . additional mechanisms are required to scatter electrons to pitch angles that are more perpendicular , and to flatten the distribution so that empty regions of phase space are filled . this results in a distribution whose temperature is controlled to a large extent by the de hoffmann - teller frame cross - shock potential and downstream density . in addition to direct measurement of the electric fields within the shock , @xcite , comparison of upstream and downstream electron phase space distributions have shown that these are consistent with electron acceleration by a cross - shock potential in the de hoffmann - teller frame @xcite . figure [ fig : combined ] may indicate that similar mechanism(s ) heat the electrons in solar wind and in snr shocks . _ this is especially appealing when we remember that @xmath133 in snrs may be overestimated due to preshock amplification of magnetic field by cosmic rays . _ in their study of the terrestrial bow shock and interplanetary shocks , schwartz et al ( 1988 ) found that the electron - ion temperature equilibration organizes best by @xmath154 . given the difficulty in determining the mach numbers of snr shocks , the equilibration dependence on shock strength has been characterized via the shock speed instead , and found to obey @xmath155 1/@xmath39@xmath156 ( @xmath39 is much more accurately known than the mach numbers ) . subsection 4.1 outlined a model for snr electron heating , where the cosmic ray diffusion coefficient @xmath157 is assumed independent of @xmath39 . from quasi - linear theory ( blandford and eichler 1987 ) , @xmath158 where @xmath148 is the energy density of turbulence ( @xmath159 ) and @xmath160 is the cosmic ray velocity . for resonant amplification , we evaluate @xmath148 at @xmath161 , where @xmath162 is the gyroradius and @xmath163 the parallel component of the cosmic ray velocity . for relativistic cosmic rays , where @xmath164 , this results in @xmath165 , assumed constant with @xmath39 . however , for nonrelativistic suprathermal particles , @xmath160 will most likely be proportional to the shock velocity @xmath39 , which with the same assumptions leads to @xmath1661/@xmath39 for solar wind shocks ( as opposed to @xmath167 in snrs ) . this argument is admittedly loose , and should not be be viewed as much more than a hypothesis to motivate further work . in our arguments above we have made considerable assumptions about @xmath121 . the most obvious one is that @xmath157 as written above applies to parallel shocks , whereas we are most likely dealing with quasi - perpendicular cases . this may reduce the difference anticipated between solar wind and smr shocks , depending on the turbulence spectrum ( summarized in appendix a of rakowski et al . 2008 ) . the degree of cosmic ray magnetic field amplification at snr shocks required to bring snr data points in figure [ fig : combined ] into alignment with solar wind data points is approximately an order of magnitude or less at the highest velocities considered . given the degree of magnetic field amplification expected from cosmic ray acceleration , this appears to be highly plausible . in the case of saturated nonresonant instability ( bell 2004 , 2005 ) by resonant scattering ( luo & melrose 2009 ) , @xmath168 is expected . in the case of nonresonant saturation , higher values , but strongly dependent on @xmath169 , are predicted . saturation by electron heating ( i.e. the @xmath133 where growth of lower hybrid waves becomes greater than the growth rate of magnetic field ) leads to similar magnetic field enhancement , with @xmath170 ( rakowski et al . such magnetic field amplification is less likely at solar wind shocks . the suprathermal particle densities are lower in solar wind shocks , and the ambient magnetic fields are higher , much closer to where the nonresonant instability would saturate ( if not already beyond it ) . collisionless shocks occur over a vast range of length scales , with those in galaxy clusters being among the largest . while the shock speeds in the galaxy cluster shocks are similar to those in supernova remnants ( up to 4000 kms@xmath26 ; markevitch 2005 ; markevitch & vikhlinin 2007 ; russell et al . 2012 ) , they occur in environments that are substantially different from both the solar wind and the ism . these differences can be encapsulated via the plasma beta , defined as the ratio of the thermal pressure to the magnetic pressure of a plasma ( @xmath171 ) . utilizing solar wind parameters listed by bruno & carbone ( 2005 ) , this ratio ranges from around unity at 1 au under fast solar wind conditions ( wind velocity @xmath10900 kms@xmath26 ) to around 20 for the quiescent wind ( wind velocity @xmath10300 kms@xmath26 ) . the plasma @xmath52 of the ism is close to that of the fast solar wind , @xmath1721 - 4 ( assuming a b=3@xmath36 g , n= 1 @xmath29 and t=10@xmath99 k ) . on the other hand , the electron temperature of the intracluster medium ( icm ) ranges from 10@xmath173k - 10@xmath71k ( 1 - 10 kev ) , with number densities steeply declining from @xmath10 10@xmath174 @xmath175 near the cluster centers to @xmath1010@xmath176 @xmath175 at the outer edges . the corresponding sound speed is close to 1000 kms@xmath26 , nearly two orders of magnitude higher than in the general ism . the magnetic fields measured in galaxy clusters are actually close that of the ism , typically on the order of a microgauss ( carilli & taylor 2002 ) . therefore , @xmath17750 kms@xmath26 in galaxy clusters , so that @xmath1781 and the magnetic field pressure has negligible contribution to the dynamics of shocks in galaxy clusters . this puts galaxy cluster shocks in a different region of parameter space than solar wind and snr shocks . clusters such as 1e0657@xmath5656 ( the bullet cluster ) and a520 show strongly enhanced x - ray emission from collisionless shocks , formed during major mergers when gas from one cluster plunges through gas from the other ( markevitch et al . 2005 ; markevitch & vikhlinin 2007 ; russell et al . shocks moving mostly along the plane of the sky have a favorable viewing geometry and appear as giant curved structures hundreds of kiloparsecs in length . the large clumps of infalling gas drive bow shocks into the cluster gas , which has already been heated to at least 1 kev , and produces thermal bremsstrahlung emission peaking close to that energy . this is another major difference between collisionless shocks in the ism and those in the icm . while the alfvnic and magnetosonic mach numbers of snr shocks are very difficult to determine due to the lack of available observational constraints on magnetohydrodynamic quantities upstream ( such as @xmath14 , @xmath13 and @xmath15 ) , those in galaxy clusters can readily be measured by spectral analysis of x - ray emission upstream . comparison of this emission to that of the enhanced postshock region gives the density contrast between the downstream and upstream gas ( i.e. , @xmath179 ) . this density contrast yields the sonic mach number , @xmath180 , via solving the rankine - hugoniot jump conditions ( russell et al . 2012 ) : @xmath181 where @xmath80 is the ratio of specific heats of the cluster gas . measurement of these jumps from x - ray observations have yielded @xmath1821.5 - 3 for the bullet cluster ( markevitch et al . 2005 ) , abell 520 and abell 2146 ( russell et al . 2012 ) . using these estimated mach numbers , the shock velocity itself can be calculated via @xmath39=@xmath183 , where @xmath153 is the upstream sound speed as inferred from the x - ray spectra . this yields shock speeds ranging between 2500 kms@xmath26 and 4000 kms@xmath26 , similar to the fastest known balmer - dominated shocks . however , fits to the x - ray spectra behind these shocks show prompt electron - ion equilibration at the shock front , consistent with @xmath16=1 ( markevitch et al . 2005 ; markevitch & vikhlinin 2007 ) , despite the extremely high shock speeds involved . this result can only be reconciled with equilibration measurements from the solar wind and snrs if the equilibration depends on the mach number , rather than @xmath39 . furthermore , given the low mach numbers found in the galaxy clusters , it is plausible that the shock transitions in these cases are laminar ( as opposed to turbulent like the snr and fastest solar wind shocks ) , with electron heating occurring efficiently at the shock front via the same type of cross - shock potential as seen in the slowest solar wind and slowest snr ( @xmath39@xmath53 400 kms@xmath26 ) shocks . this is of course a speculation ; further insight into collisionless cluster shocks may be obtained via numerical simulations for the appropriate conditions . there have been exciting advances in the study of electron - ion temperature equilibration in collisionless shocks during the past few years . perhaps most notable has been the growing realization that temperature equilibration and cosmic ray acceleration may be intertwined processes . optical studies of collisionless shocks in partially neutral gas ( balmer - dominated shocks ) have shown that the electron - ion temperature equilibration is a declining function of shock speed , well characterized as @xmath16@xmath184 . this relationship most likely arises due to electron heating ahead of the shock that is nearly independent of shock speed above 400 kms@xmath26 . cosmic ray precursors , with moderately amplified preshock magnetic field and density , are the most logical sites for electron heating in snr collisionless shocks . the transition to fully equilibrated snr shocks at speeds below 400 kms@xmath26 may be due to a less turbulent and more laminar structure at low shock speeds and mach numbers . this allows the electrons to experience a more uniform cross - shock potential , and hence higher energization compared to higher shock speeds and mach numbers , where the shock jump is more turbulent and disordered . the magnetosonic mach numbers of snr shocks may match those in solar wind shocks if there is a approximately an order of magnitude increase in the alfvn speed of the preshock gas in snrs compared to the average ism value . this is possible if there is a moderately amplified preshock magnetic field ( @xmath1010 ) , and is readily provided by compression and heating in a cosmic ray precursor . in solar wind shocks , the precursor is due to suprathermal , non - relativistic ions , resulting in a @xmath16@xmath185 seen in the solar wind . while balmer - dominated shocks have allowed us to elucidate some of the physics of electron - ion temperature equilibration , ion - neutral damping limits most of those observed to cases where the shock structure has not become strongly modified by cosmic ray acceleration . given this limitation , _ electron - ion equilibration studies of fast , collisionless shocks in fully pre - ionized gas would be highly desirable_. such a sample would allow the equilibration to be studied over a range of speeds where shocks are increasingly affected by feedback from the accelerated cosmic rays . in such circumstances it is unclear what would happen to the @xmath16 versus @xmath39 relation . if , as predicted by amato & blasi ( 2009 ) , bell s non - resonant cosmic ray instability takes over from the resonant instability at the highest shock speeds , then additional electron heating may occur in the fastest shocks ( @xmath39@xmath585000 kms@xmath26 ) , resulting in substantial deviation from the @xmath16@xmath184 relation . such deviations may already have been seen in the fastest ( @xmath39@xmath582000 kms@xmath26 ) shocks , where there is evidence that @xmath16 does not settle down to @xmath17 , but rather @xmath100.03 . other deviations may have been detected in snr [email protected] , where @xmath16 for a 5000 kms@xmath26 shock has been estimated to be @xmath100.2 , substantially higher than predicted by the inverse squared relation . however , the study of such shocks would be challenging . without an h@xmath48 broad component to constrain the range of @xmath39 , shock speeds would have to be determined by other means , such as proper motion studies . that would require x - ray and or uv imagery of snrs with well - constrained distances ( such as those in the lmc or smc ) , over multiple epochs . it would also require spectroscopy of the forward shocks in these snrs , in order to constrain both the electron temperature ( via x - ray continuum fits and and uv emission line ratios ) and the ion temperature ( e.g. , via he ii , c iv , n v and o vi resonance lines ) . an important test of our ideas concerning electron heating by cosmic ray generated waves in a shock precursor would be to measure electron temperatures at snr shocks exhibiting strong cosmic ray modification and substantial magnetic field amplification ( @xmath186100 ) . several snrs show x - ray filaments produced by synchrotron radiation from cosmic ray electrons , and are generally distinct from those shocks with strong balmer emission . the absence of neutral material ahead of these shock means that optical and uv emission is weak , and electron temperatures will have to be measured from x - ray spectra . difficulties arise in distinguishing thermal electron bremsstrahlung from cosmic ray electron synchrotron emission , requiring data of high signal to noise . further complications in some snrs ( e.g. cas a ) stem from scattering of bright x - ray emission from the ejecta such that it coincides spatially with emission from the forward shock . such scattering may either be local , due to snr dust , or instrumental , due to telescope imperfections . this leaves sn 1006 as the best likely target for such an observation , since due to its evolutionary state , only the outer layers of ejecta have encountered the reverse shock . the development of missions like solar orbiter and solar probe plus will allow _ in situ _ measurements of shocks in the solar wind , most likely associated with coronal mass ejections , much closer to the sun . these will probe a different parameter regime , where the magnetic field pressure dominates over the gas pressure ( low @xmath52 , similar to ism shocks ) . as such , measurements here might yield insights into the properties of similar plasma in the precursors of snr shocks where the magnetic field has been amplified by cosmic rays . g. acknowledges support by hst grant hst - go-11184.07-a to towson university . jml acknowledges support by grant nnh10a009i from the nasa astrophysics data analysis program , and by basic research funds of the office of naval research . k. a. eriksen , j. p. hughes , c. badenes , r. fesen , p. ghavamian , d. moffett , p. p. plucinsky , c. e. rakowski , e. m. reynoso , and p. slane . . _ astrophysical journal _ , 728:0 l28 , february 2011 . doi : 10.1088/2041 - 8205/728/2/l28 . k. france , r. mccray , s. v. penton , r. p. kirshner , p. challis , j. m. laming , p. bouchet , r. chevalier , p. m. garnavich , c. fransson , k. heng , j. larsson , s. lawrence , p. lundqvist , n. panagia , c. s. j. pun , n. smith , j. sollerman , g. sonneborn , b. sugerman , and j. c. wheeler . _ astrophysical journal _ , 743:0 186 , december 2011 . doi : 10.1088/0004 - 637x/743/2/186 . e. a. helder , j. vink , c. gh . bassa , a. bamba , j. a. m. bleeker , s. funk , p. ghavamian , k. j. van der heyden , f. verbunt , and r. yamazaki . . _ science _ , 325:0 719 , august 2009 . doi : 10.1126/science.1173383 . a. masters , s. j. schwartz , e. m. henley , m. f. thomsen , b. zieger , a. j. coates , n. achilleos , j. mitchell , k. c. hansen , and m. k. dougherty . . _ journal of geophysical research ( space physics ) _ , 116:0 a10107 , october 2011 . doi : 10.1029/2011ja016941 . h. r. russell , b. r. mcnamara , j. s. sanders , a. c. fabian , p. e. j. nulsen , r. e. a. canning , s. a. baum , m. donahue , a. edge , l. j. king and c. p. odea . . _ monthly notices of the royal astronomical society _ , 423:0 236255 , june 2012 . doi : 10.1111/j.1365 - 2966.2012.20808.x . t. tanaka , y. uchiyama , f. a. aharonian , t. takahashi , a. bamba , j. s. hiraka , j. kataoka , t. kishishita , m. kokubun , k. mori , k. nakazawa , r. petre , h. tajima , and s. watanabe . . _ astrophysical journal _ , 685:0 9881004 , october 2008 . doi : 10.1086/591020 . j. s. warren , j. p. hughes , c. badenes , p. ghavamian , c. f. mckee , d. moffett , p. plucinsky , c. e. rakowski , e. reynoso , and p. slane . . _ astrophysical journal _ , 634:0 376389 , november 2005 . doi : 10.1086/496941 . b. j. williams , w. p. blair , j. m. blondin , k. j. borkowski , p. ghavamian , k. s. long , j. c. raymond , s. p. reynolds , j. rho , and p. f. winkler . . _ astrophysical journal _ , 741:0 96 , november 2011 . doi : 10.1088/0004 - 637x/741/2/96 . c. s. wu , d. winske , m. tanaka , k. papadopoulos , k. akimoto , c. c. goodrich , y. m. zhou , s. t. tsai , p. rodriguez , and c. s. lin . . _ space science reviews _ , 37:0 63109 , january 1984 . doi : 10.1007/bf00213958 . Abstract:

Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.

Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered . Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video . Paper: cosmological gamma - ray bursts are one of the most interesting and exotic phenomena in astrophysics . in standard burst models ( e.g. see piran 1999 ; mszros 2001 for reviews ) , the rapidly expanding fireball decelerates , converting the internal energy of the hot plasma into kinetic energy of the beamed , relativistically moving ejecta and electron - positron pairs . at the point where the fireball becomes optically thin and the gamma - ray burst ( grb ) we see is emitted , the matter will not emit non - thermal gamma - rays unless some mechanism can efficiently re - convert the kinetic energy back into internal energy , i.e. , unless some particle acceleration process takes place . diffusive shock acceleration is widely believed to be this mechanism ( e.g. , rees & mszros 1992 ; piran 1999 ) for the prompt emission ; it is also likely to be a key element for the underlying physics of x - ray and optical flashes and burst afterglows . an important question concerning burst models is whether or not their prompt emission can be accurately described by a detailed shock acceleration analysis , and if so , how is the pertinent parameter space of models limited by the observations ? tavani ( 1996a , b ) proposed a synchrotron shock emission model that invoked such diffusive acceleration as the means for generating non - thermal distributions . this work has been an interpretative driver in the field , due in part to the impressive model fits of data he obtained . yet , tavani s model and many subsequent works do not treat the critical involvement the acceleration process has on shaping the relationship between the thermal and non - thermal portions of the electron distribution . the normal approach is to simplify the distribution to a truncated or broken power - law , occasionally with an additional thermal component . the viability of the synchrotron model , or emission scenarios that invoke any other radiation mechanism , hinges on such subtleties of the particle distribution , which are inextricably linked to the nature of shock acceleration , diffusive or coherent . in addition , they must provide compatibility with the hard x - ray spectral index , an issue raised by preece et al . ( 1998 ; 2000 ) , who observed that around 1/3 of all batse bursts exhibited spectra that were too flat below the peak to accommodate a synchrotron interpretation . this paper explores the general expectations for burst emission spectra from shock acceleration theory . parametric descriptions for a linear combination of thermal and non - thermal distributions are used to obtain fits to burst spectra for the cases of the synchrotron , inverse compton and synchrotron self - compton ( ssc ) mechanisms , and these distributions are interpreted in the context of known results from acceleration simulations . cases of particles cooling much slower than their acceleration are treated in this exposition ; justification for these are discussed in section [ sec : cooling ] . the focus is on grbs observed by the compton gamma - ray observatory , specifically those with egret detections that provide broad spectral coverage and therefore more constrained fits around the spectral peak . it is found that acceptable fits are only possible with a marked dominance of non - thermal electrons , contrasting the particle distributions obtained in acceleration simulations . this poses a general problem for any burst acceleration paradigm where the non - thermal population is drawn probabilistically from a thermal gas . in addition , fits are found to be more or less equally acceptable for the synchrotron and inverse compton processes ; it is anticipated that swift will provide a number of bright bursts where spectral fitting down into the x - ray band might enable discrimination between such emission mechanisms . however , at this juncture , spectroscopic discrimination against unabsorbed synchrotron self - compton scenarios seems probable , given that the characteristically broad ssc spectra in space are difficult to reconcile with cgro data . in service of this analysis , a compact formalism for ssc emissivities from thermal and truncated power - law electron distributions is present in the appendix . it is anticipated that glast s broad spectral coverage from kev to gev , supplied by the gamma - ray burst monitor in the batse band and the large area telescope in and above the egret band , will render glast a powerful tool in constraining and interpreting burst spectral properties in the future . this section explores the relationship of synchrotron spectra to the electron energy and angular distributions , inferring lorentz factor distributions using data from the bright burst grb 910503 as a representative case study . the formalism for synchrotron radiation in optically thin environs is standard and readily available in many textbooks , including the treatments of bekefi ( 1966 ) , jackson ( 1975 ) and rybicki & lightman ( 1979 ) . throughout this paper , the standard convention for the labelling of the photon polarizations will be adopted , namely that refers to the state with the photon s _ electric _ field vector parallel to the plane containing the magnetic field and the photon s momentum vector , while denotes the photon s electric field vector being normal to this plane . the classical ( photon ) angle - integrated emissivities for the and polarization for monoenergetic electrons of lorentz factor moving at angle to the field are ( e.g. westfold 1959 ; jackson 1975 ; rybicki and lightman 1979 ) @xmath0 in units of , where the are modified bessel functions of the second kind . the generally higher probability of emitting photons than ones reflects the intrinsic dipolar radiative nature of accelerating / oscillating charges ; the polarization is elliptical for photon propagation along the field . the characteristic synchrotron rate factor that scales these emissivities is @xmath1 here , is the fine structure constant . the photon energies that appear in these functions that form the scaling for the energies of emission are [ with the electron compton wavelength over being ] : @xmath2 where is the particle s larmor radius , and gauss is the quantum critical field . note that since , the photon angles to the field form a narrow distribution about . furthermore , the expressions in eq . ( [ eq : synchrate ] ) are appropriate for cases where the particle momenta are not closely aligned with the magnetic field ; situations of such near alignment are discussed in section [ sec : pitch_synch ] below . the total synchrotron emissivity is obtained by integrating over the energy and angular distribution of the particles . for electron distributions in units of , summing over polarizations forms the expression for the emissivity that will be used mostly throughout this paper ( in units of ): @xmath3 this is the differential photon spectrum ; frequently in this work , reference will be made to the so - called spectrum , a spectral energy distribution that is proportional to . physical diagnostics on the grb environment are obtained by comparing the emission spectrum in eq . ( [ eq : synch_emiss ] ) with observations . the obvious database of choice comprises batse observations from the compton gamma - ray observatory ( cgro ) , specifically the batse spectroscopy catalog of preece et al . ( 2000 ) with its pubicly - accessible electronic compilation . yet this data possesses a principal limitation , namely that imposed by the restricted energy band of batse . inferences of particle distributions are generally on a more secure footing when using broader burst spectra , particularly in domains of significant spectra structure , which is the intrinsic nature of the batse pool . thus , the two decades of energy afforded by batse often are insufficient to describe the nature of the non - thermal particle distribution invoked in models . data from the egret experiment on cgro suitably augment this situation and extend the dynamic range by 24 orders of magnitude in energy . accordingly , a focus on egret bursts is insightful and offers more secure determinations of particle distributions . use is therefore made of spectral compilations of batse , comptel and egret data that are offered in schaefer et al . specifically , a case study is made here of grb 910503 , observing that the inferences to be made generally extend to the handful of other egret bursts , and also to a large number of bright batse bursts that possess no confirmed egret detections . note that the focus here is primarily on time - integrated spectra . given the complexity and diversity of burst time profiles , and associated variations in spectral shape and the well - known hard - to - soft evolution , detailed spectral fits will depend on the time window chosen . a classic example for this is provided by the gradual emergence of a hard gamma - ray component in the spectrum of grb 941017 ( gonzalez , et al . the main conclusions of this paper apply to the mean properties of the emitting particle distributions , and are striking enough to indicate their applicability for most or nearly all of the duration of the bursts studied herein . a variety of particle distributions are possible in modeling burst spectra . clearly , all should contain a non - thermal component , since the data are clearly non - thermal : purely isothermal models do not work ( pacynski 1986 ; goodman 1986 ) , though constructed convolutions of thermal spectra of different temperatures are possible . the emphasis here is motivated by physical interpretation , and the leading contender for non - thermal particle energization in bursts is diffusive acceleration at relativistic shocks in the burst outflow . such acceleration is well studied in non - relativistic flows , and is widely believed to originate with thermal particles that are diffusively transported when interacting with field turbulence in the shock environs . such transport effects many crossings of the shock layer ( e.g. see drury 1983 ; blandford & eichler 1987 ; jones & ellison 1991 for reviews ) , that lead to a friction term in the momentum evolution , i.e. acceleration . while other acceleration models such as reconnection and coherent electrodynamic energization exist and are appropriate in a variety of astrophysical environments ( e.g. the solar corona , pulsar magnetospheres ) , diffusive shock acceleration is the most widely invoked in astrophysical models ; it forms the centerpiece of discussion here as well as for many investigations of bursts . tavani ( 1996a , b ) proposed a shock emission model that invoked such diffusive acceleration as the means for generating non - thermal distributions . this work has been an interpretative driver in the field , in no small part due to the impressive model fits of data obtained . the principal purpose of this section is to delve deeper into the physical implications of such data fitting . accordingly , it is appropriate to use an electron distribution similar to tavani s ( 1996a , b ) to add insight to the discussion . here , the quasi - isotropic electron distribution @xmath4 is adopted , where is a step function with for and zero otherwise , and is the system or post - shock temperature . the factor directly relates to the efficiency of acceleration , and is a parameter in the fitting protocol , as are ( assumed much greater then unity ) , the dimensionless , the non - thermal index , and the normalization factor . the ensuing discussion will provide physical grounds justifying this choice of distribution in shocked environs ; other possibilities with different mandates include the broken power - law adopted by lloyd & petrosian ( 2000 ) . note that is independent of for true isotropy . in many cases in this paper , will be chosen for simplicity , since this corresponds to the dominant radiative contribution from the synchrotron mechanism . the parameter is introduced to generalize from tavani s ( 1996a , b ) fits , permitting the non - thermal distribution to emerge perhaps at truly super - thermal energies , rather than exactly in the thermal peak ( tavani s restricted case ) . typical acceleration spectra in non - relativistic shocks assume forms similar in general appearance to eq . ( [ eq : elec_dist ] ) . specifically , they correspond to the portion of parameter space ( at least for ions ) , so that dissipation in the shock layer leads to a heating plus non - thermal acceleration that ensues only at super - thermal energies in the maxwell - boltzmann tail . evidence for such a structured distribution can be found both in heliospheric measurements of accelerated ions near shocks ( e.g. earth s bow shock : see ellison , mbius & paschmann 1990 ; interplanetary shocks : see baring et al . 1997 ) , and also a variety of acceleration simulations and theoretical analyses ( e.g. see scholer , trattner & kucharek 1992 ; giacalone et al . 1993 , baring , ellison & jones 1993 ; ellison , baring & jones 1996 ; kang & jones 1997 ) . the situation for relativistic shocks is less certain , due in no small part to the absence of _ in situ _ spacecraft determinations of particle spectra ; simulation expectations for such environments are discussed below . in this paper , values of appear , being in general only weakly constrained by the fits and largely motivated by the above physical and theoretical considerations . while numerical evaluations of eq . ( [ eq : synch_emiss ] ) given the electron distribution in eq . ( [ eq : elec_dist ] ) were performed to obtain approximations to burst spectra , standard asymptotic limits are readily attainable in analytic form . the non - thermal contribution to the synchrotron spectrum ( from the truncated power - law ) , dominant whenever , assumes the following power - law forms ( derived , for example , from eq . [ [ eq : synchfinal ] ] ) : @xmath5 here , is the component of the field perpendicular to the instantaneous electron motion . the thermal component , sampled when , necessarily declines exponentially at photon energies well above the thermal peak , but possesses the same power - law dependence as in the non - thermal case for low photon energies : @xmath6 this spectral similarity at low energies follows from the narrow nature of the distributions being convolved with the synchrotron emissivity functions in eq . ( [ eq : synchrate ] ) . accordingly , it is not possible to distinguish between emission from thermal or power - law distributions if spectrum measurements exist only at energies below the peak ; some other diagnostic is required . the exponential decline above the thermal peak possesses a somewhat complex two - domain structure ; the reader is referred to pavlov & golenetskii ( 1986 ) , brainerd & petrosian ( 1987 ) and baring ( 1988a ) for the presentation of appropriate asymptotic forms in cases . it must be noted that throughout this paper , photon spectra are generated in the shock rest frame ( srf ) and then boosted in energy to the observer s frame ( of ) by a fixed doppler factor , independent of photon angle in the srf . this approximation , essentially adopted in many models of grb spectra , is expedient but does not accommodate the fact that photon distributions in the srf are inherently anisotropic due both to the instrinsic nature of the synchrotron and inverse compton processes , and also to the fact that relativistic shocks naturally generate anisotropic ions and electrons . notwithstanding , this boost approximation does not dramatically distort the angle - integrated of spectral shape for typical srf angular distributions and suffices to describe the continuum for the purposes of the discussions here . before presentation of results , it is appropriate to address the modeling procedure used in this paper . approximate spectra , as opposed to data fits , were derived visually using both log - log and semi - log representations of spectra to increase confidence in the results . least squares trials were performed in some cases , but with no addition of insight or perceived accuracy . this choice of a visual approach was one of expediency , and did not compromise the scientific conclusions presented here ; the essential points are unambiguously made without the need of statistical analysis . this latitude is afforded by the limited energy range of the data in the batse catalog : slight adjustments in parameters used to fit the extant data for a given burst would almost certainly have been dominated by those needed to accommodate a broader spectral range . for the specific cases of grb 910503 and grb 910601 , where egret data are incorporated in the study , the uncertainty in the mev data points is a major contributor to the determination of model parameters . in bursts where no egret or comptel data were used , the `` fit '' was actually to the band ( 1993 ) model spectral fit presented in the preece et al . ( 2000 ) spectroscopy catalog , not to the actual data . in such cases , the high energy band model index was adopted , and other distribution parameters adjusted . in this sense , there was in implicit second order incorporation of the statistics embodied in the band model fit . it must be emphasized that there is no uniquely preferred method for statistically fitting public data since it is already a convolution of model and instrumental response . the correct approach ( as in lloyd & petrosian 2000 ) would be to fold spectral models here through the batse or egret detector response function , an enterprise that rapidly becomes more ambitious when different instrumental responses must be blended . such complexity seems premature for the explorations of this paper , and is deferred until the more refined data of swift and glast becomes available . results for the spectral approximation of the grb 910503 data are presented in figure [ fig : synch_spec_dist ] , together with the multi - instrument , time - integrated cgro data as provided by schaefer ( private communication ) prior to the public release in schaefer et al . we remark that the spectral deconvolutions published in schaefer et al . ( 1998 ) were made independently for each data set from the different cgro instruments , applying an artificial normalization to reconcile offsets in the different data amplitudes . such a procedure is less accurate than a joint spectral deconvolution of the entire spectral data set ( see for example the analysis of grb 990123 data in briggs et al . notwithstanding , the major conclusions of this paper are robust and are not affected by such subtleties of data analysis . figure [ fig : synch_spec_dist ] displays both synchrotron emission spectra for the case of pitch angles ( the so - called _ quasi - isotropic _ case ) , and the inferred electron distribution that generates the continuum . for the solid curve approximate case , the overall normalization is obviously a free parameter and was offset slightly from the data for visual clarity . the electron distributions were normalized to unit area in space . the solid curve depicts the case that would be required to explain the photon spectrum . the non - thermal particle distribution clearly dominates the thermal component in this `` fit . '' its index differs from the value of 3.8 that tavani ( 1996a ) obtained in his analysis of this burst , a discrepancy that is actually insignificant given the error bars in the egret data . adjustment of the parameter to improve the appearance of the model approximation around and above the spectral peak led to the assumed value of , accurate to around 15% . notwithstanding , there appears to be some spectral structure around the peak that can not be explained by the simple particle distribution in eq . ( [ eq : elec_dist ] ) . the positioning of the peak in energy produced the fit value , where is the lorentz factor associated with the bulk motion of the grb expansion . here , is interpreted as the magnetic field in the burst expansion frame , i.e. , not in the ism or shock rest frames . the parameter describing the relative normalization of the non - thermal and thermal components was found to be ( ) , a strikingly large value that is not addressed explicitly in detail by tavani ( 1996a ) . a discussion of the implications of an inferred particle distribution with such a large follows just below . a similar property is obtained for synchrotron model fits for batse bursts grb 940619 ( trigger number 3035_6 ) and grb 940817 ( trigger number 3128_5 ) from the preece et al . ( 2000 ) catalog , and also for grb 910601 and grb 910814 whose composite spectra are presented in schaefer et al . the spectra for bursts grb 930131 and grb 940217 that possess egret detections also suggest a similar result , though the lack of a composite broad - band multi - instrument spectrum for each in the literature precluded a detailed analysis . the parameter regime of is expected to be pervasive for batse bursts , due to the smoothness of their circumpeak continua . for comparative purposes , another distribution and its resultant synchrotron is illustrated in figure [ fig : synch_spec_dist ] as dashed curves . the distribution was deliberately chosen to possess a somewhat dominant thermal component , motivated by expectations from shock acceleration theory , and clearly yields a spectrum that grossly deviates from the observations both well above and well below the peak . while these deductions are obtained using a time - integrated spectrum , such a conclusion must apply either for most of the burst duration , or at sub - intervals when the burst was at its brightest . for the synchrotron mechanism to be a viable explanation of grb spectra , the underlying particle distribution must be physically realistic . here , expectations of particle distributions from shock acceleration theory are the predominant focus , partly because this was the preferred acceleration mechanism in tavani ( 1996a , b ) , and largely because this is the underlying energization assumed in most burst models . in a nutshell , both theory and observation pertaining to non - relativistic shocks strongly indicate and cases . note that is essentially the parameter that demarcates the relative normalization of the non - thermal and thermal components in equation ( [ eq : elec_dist ] ) . applications of shock acceleration in the heliosphere and at supernova remnant shells more or less mandate these parameter regimes , since the seed pool of particles that can be subjected to acceleration are thermal and moreover plentiful . in heliospheric environs , the source is the cold solar wind , and there is little evidence of significant pre - heating that is not connected to the shock system under study . the _ in situ _ spacecraft measurements exhibit strong heating at shocks and the generation of dominant thermal ions in the downstream regions , corresponding to cases . data taken at the high sonic mach number earth s bow shock ( e.g. see ellison , mbius & paschmann 1990 ; scholer , trattner & kucharek 1992 ) and low sonic and afvnic mach number interplanetary shocks ( e.g. see gosling et al . 1981 ; baring et al . 1997 ) clearly support this assertion . in supernova remnants , direct particle measurements are , or course , impossible , and inferences can only be made from radiative signatures . while electron temperatures and densities can be estimated from x - ray signals and molecular emission in the ir / optical bands , the data can not yet clearly discriminate and situations . from a theoretical perspective , diffusive shock acceleration naturally draws particles from the thermal pool via transport in shock - associated turbulence . whether this be first or second order in momentum transport , thermal and non - thermal particles are subjected to similar diffusion , at least as far as ions are concerned , so that circumstances would require virtually complete suppression of thermalization and a 100% efficiency of acceleration out of the thermal pool . such a scenario would require unusually anomalous spatial diffusion coefficients ( i.e. extremely small ) at thermal momenta , or perhaps strange and non - dissipative electrodynamic properties in the shock layer . note that is more likely to increase at low energies due to the possibility of wave damping by thermal populations ( e.g. see forman , jokipii & owens 1974 , for the relationship between and wave power spectra within the confines of quasi - linear theory ) . without the assumption of anomalous forms for , monte carlo transport simulations ( e.g. see baring , ellison & jones 1993 ; ellison , baring & jones 1996 ) clearly indicate a downstream thermal population that dominates the extended non - thermal distribution in number , corresponding to . the `` injection '' of ions from the thermal pool is extremely efficient , but not incredibly so . hybrid plasma simulations ( e.g. see trattner & scholer 1991 , 1993 ; scholer , trattner & kucharek 1992 ; giacalone et al . 1992 , 1993 ; liewer , goldstein & omidi 1993 ) of wave generation and ion transport near non - relativistic shocks , which treat the electron component as a background fluid and therefore address only some of the electrodynamic aspects of the plasma in the shock layer , produce similar distributions . these indications are strongly suggestive , but not decisive for the gamma - ray burst problem , since they largely do nt focus on electron properties and equally importantly do not explore acceleration at relativistic shocks . in situ measurements of non - thermal electrons at shocks are limited ; examples include recent geotail observations of interplanetary shocks ( shimada , et al . 1999 ; terasawa et al . , 2001 ) . accordingly , discussion is dependent on simulational information , as is the case for relativistic shocks , and the literature is sparse on such a subject . monte carlo simulations of ion acceleration at relativistic shocks ( e.g. ellison , jones & reynolds 1990 ; baring 1999 ; ellison & double 2002 ) generate the same injection properties as do non - relativistic shocks , i.e. . plasma simulations of relativistic shocks are similarly sparsely studied . gallant et al . ( 1992 ) and hoshino et al . ( 1992 ) presented results from one - dimensional ( 1d ) particle - in - cell ( pic ) simulations of electron - positron and electron - positron - proton plasmas in ultrarelativistic flows with perpendicular shocks , where the mean field was orthogonal to the shock normal . such simulations treat the full electrodynamics of such plasmas , but are severely limited by cpu constraints . accordingly , they tend to use unrealistically small proton to electron mass ratios , and model relatively small spatial scales . these constraints tend to mask the production of some wave modes and limit consideration to particles with energies at most a few to ten times thermal . the context for these investigations was pulsar wind flows , and they revealed no acceleration in pure plasmas . with the addition of protons in significant abundances , hoshino et al . ( 1992 ) demonstrated that non - thermal positrons ( and not electrons ) could be created , as the ions generated elliptically - polarized magnetosonic modes that resonantly interacted with the positrons . mace and jones ( 1994 , unpublished ; f. jones , private communication ) explored a 1d pic simulation similar to gallant et al . ( 1992 ) for an ultrarelativistic plasma shock of arbitrary field obliquity , and found that electron / positron acceleration arose in quasi - parallel scenarios , but disappeared when the field obliquity to the shock normal increased above around degrees , concurring with zero acceleration in the earlier results for perpendicular shocks . a scaled version of their parallel shock distribution ( binned in energy ) is depicted in fig . [ fig : synch_spec_dist ] , and is fairly proximate to the , case . a notable feature of the simulation data is the very limited range of energies accessible to the pic technique , imposed by the severe cpu limitations for such complex codes . some interesting recent pic simulations results have been presented by shimada & hoshino ( 2000 ) and hoshino & shimada ( 2002 ) for electron - proton plasmas containing mildly - relativistic shocks , where suprathermal power - law electrons are generated and the distribution closely resembles the pic simulation data depicted in fig . [ fig : synch_spec_dist ] . yet , as with the mace and jones results , the complete distribution reveals that the power - law emerges only well into the maxwellian tail , corresponding to the situation elicited in the monte carlo simulations . it is noted in passing that the one - dimensional nature of these simulations potentially imposes an important absence of critical physics to the acceleration problem : jokipii , kta & giacalone ( 1993 ) and jones , jokipii and baring ( 1998 ) demonstrate that particle diffusion across field lines is eliminated when simulations restrict the spatial dimensions to less than three . the implication of this result for the shocks is a cessation of acceleration when thermal particles can not be transported across fields to return to the shock from the downstream side ; baring , ellison & jones ( 1993 ) demonstrated that for high mach number , non - relativistic ion shocks , a quenching of acceleration through this effect would arise at around , a result that matched the behavior seen in the relativistic pic simulations of mace and jones . moreover this result is consistent with the absence of acceleration in non - relativistic 1d hybrid plasma simulations applied to the quasi - perpendicular heliospheric termination shock ( e.g. liewer , goldstein & omidi 1993 ; kucharek & scholer 1995 ) , a site that is believed to generate the non - thermal anomalous cosmic rays . the essential loss of physics in simulations of restricted dimensionality is clearly crucial to the correct modeling and interpretation of particle acceleration in gamma - ray bursts . the principal conclusion of this discussion is that there is little observational or simulational evidence for quasi - isotropic electron distributions in the environs of shocks that would render a synchrotron spectrum commensurate with the grb910503 data in particular and typical burst spectra in general . an issue that has already been substantially discussed in the literature is whether the synchrotron model is compatible with spectral slopes below the burst peak . for grb 910503 , fig . [ fig : synch_spec_dist ] clearly indicates that there is no conflict between the data and the model . the fixed value of for the low energy index in eqs . [ eq : ntsynch_limits ] and [ eq : thsynch_limits ] suggests that this is not the situation for all bursts , a fact that was demonstrated by preece et al . ( 1998 ; see also preece et al . 2000 ; 2002 ) . synchrotron theory distinctly predicts this canonical index at low energies for any isotropic electron distribution that has a characteristic lorentz factor as its lower scale . correlations between lorentz factors and pitch angles can alter this property , as discussed in section [ sec : pitch_synch ] below . any index greater than this value can not be accommodated by quasi - isotropic distributions ; indices less than this are easily described by a steepening particle distribution above . preece et al.s ( 2000 ) display of the distribution of low energy indices clearly indicated a conflict , as illustrated in fig . [ fig : batse_low_index ] . there the low energy indices for various empirical fitting models used in the batse spectroscopy catalog are binned in a histogram , with the permitted range of clearly marked . the most common fitting model used in the catalog was the popular band ( 1993 ) grb model for the observed flux in photons/@xmath7/sec : @xmath8 most bursts possess values and . in folding the band model , broken power - law models and others through the batse detector response , preece et al . ( 2000 ) found that the band model performed best in roughly 2/3 of the burst sample . note that the index recorded in the catalog is the asymptotic low energy index ( preece et al . 2000 ) , and does not exactly match the index local to the lowest energy kev in the batse window . the inferred values of are subject to instrumental selection effects , particularly when the peak energy is low . hence , there is the possibility that the distribution might move to slightly higher when the detection band moves to lower energy , the situation for swift . note that such an effect was observed by preece et al . ( 1998 ) when applying a correction to accommodate the energy of the batse window . a depiction of the histogram for time - integrated spectra in the batse spectroscopy catalog is given in lloyd & petrosian ( 2000 ) ; it exhibits a similar distribution , as expected . the quasi - isotropic synchrotron model clearly can not account for nearly 25% of sample burst spectra . this is true even for pathological choices of electron energy distributions : from the form in eq . ( [ eq : synch_emiss ] ) , it is easily shown that the spectral index is a monotonically increasing function of energy for any electron distribution , due to the broad and smooth nature of the synchrotron emissivities in eq . ( [ eq : synchrate ] ) . while this is disturbing , it may be more of an indication of problems with assumptions underpinning the bound than a suggestion that synchrotron radiation is not responsible for grb prompt emission . for instance , relaxing an adherence to isotropy or distributions can potentially alter the spectral slope . it is demonstrated in section [ sec : anis_synch ] below that for an independent of , the spectrum below the peak can not be flattened beyond cases , and in fact steepens . however , introducing a -dependent angular distribution can suitably ease the bound ; this is exemplified in the focus on pitch angle synchrotron emission in section [ sec : pitch_synch ] . an alternative recourse is synchrotron self - absorption , i.e. relaxation of an optically thin assumption . given the theoretical expectation of extremely flat spectra below the break ( for power - law electrons and a raleigh - jeans tail for thermal : see , e.g. , rybicki & lightman 1979 ) , different groups have invoked such a mechanism to account for cases in the batse catalog ( e.g. crider & liang 1999 ; granot , piran & sari 2000 ) . pushing the absorption break to gamma - ray energies requires extreme physical conditions ( @xmath9 , gauss ) , as noted by lloyd & petrosian ( 2000 ) , and can be inferred from eq . ( [ eq : selfabs_energy ] ) . these parameter regimes would be more extreme in the absence of the strong doppler boosting associated with grb outflows . equipartition is usually invoked to justify such high fields , however a widely - accepted and well - understood mechanism for the generation of such fields remains elusive . a convenient resolution of this issue is afforded by the proposition of panaitescu & meszaros ( 2000 ) , namely that the prompt emission is an inverse compton image of a self - absorbed synchrotron spectrum . the concomitant moving of the absorption break energy to below the optical band lowers the required values of and to less extraordinary ranges . the x - ray spectral indices in the scenario of panaitescu & meszaros ( 2000 ; see also liang , boettcher & kocevski 2003 ) can comfortably accommodate the domain , as discussed in section [ sec : alphalow_comp ] . an additional concern is that the turnover energy ( in the grb expansion frame ) satisfying is a function of a number of environmental parameters . equation ( 6.53 ) of rybicki & lightman ( 1979 ) for the optical depth for self - absorption can be manipulated to arrive at the equation for . this result can be found in many papers ; here eq . ( 7 ) of baring ( 1988b ) is adapted to accommodate the specific form for the non - thermal portion of the distribution in eq . ( [ eq : elec_dist ] ) : @xmath10 for @xmath11 here , is the thomson optical depth of the emission region , and , as before . note that represents the gamma function in eq . ( [ eq : phidef ] ) . the density and size of the absorbing medium are incorporated in . these parameters possess implicit dependence on the bulk lorentz factor of the flow , with different evolutionary dependences for adiabatic and radiative expansion cases ( e.g. , see dermer , chiang & bttcher 1999 ) . if eq . ( [ eq : selfabs_energy ] ) is interpreted in the frame of the burst outflow , then is in the euv / soft x - ray band for typical burst lorentz factors . given the number of parameters ( five in all ) contributing to the computation of the self - absorption optical depth , it is difficult to comprehend how can be fine - tuned to the batse band in the observer s frame ; such a conspiracy is an issue also for optically thin synchrotron emission , whose peak depends on three parameters , , and . a strong test of the self - absorption proposition could be offered by swift , which should determine whether or not batse was fully capable of determining the `` asymptotic '' values of , especially for those bursts with peaks around 100 kev or lower . the gamma - ray burst monitor ( gbm ) on glast will provide an additional broad - band probe . should the batse distribution be mirrored by the swift and gbm ones , synchrotron self - absorption in the gamma - ray band could then only be operating in a small minority of bursts , rendering it less germane to the spectral shape discussion , except perhaps for synchrotron self - compton models . the foregoing discussion has focused on the case of synchrotron emission from quasi - isotropic or large pitch angle electron distributions . distributing the angles of electrons in a non - uniform manner can alter the spectral index of the emitted radiation . a prime example of this was the flattening incurred in distributing magnetic pair creation turnovers in neutron star environments , probed by baring ( 1990 ) . here , obviously a distribution skewed towards small pitch angles is a potential candidate for modifying . such a distribution is not at all contrived : synchrotron cooling can produce it quite naturally ( e.g. see brainerd & lamb 1987 ) . however , as alluded to above , it is now demonstrated that such distributions , if uncorrelated with lorentz factor , yield only spectral steepening , and so can not resolve the low energy index problem . the spectral behavior can adequately be demonstrated using the non - thermal portion of eq . ( [ eq : elec_dist ] ) , which for the purposes of this discussion will be written in the form for and is zero otherwise . here . if is defined as the dimensionless cyclotron energy , then the differential rate of production of synchrotron photons in eq . ( [ eq : synch_emiss ] ) can be quickly manipulated by reversing the integrations over and . the result is @xmath12 where @xmath13 is the synchrotron emissivity scale , and @xmath14 this form for the synchrotron rate will be used later in the discussions on synchrotron self - compton emission . by adding and subtracting suitable forms like eq . ( [ eq : synchfinal ] ) with different choices of , a general expression for the synchrotron emission from a piece - wise continuous power - law distribution of electrons can be obtained . defining the photon spectral index to be , it is easily shown that is a monotonically increasing function of energy for any electron distribution with a low cutoff , using piecewise continuous power - laws to successively refine approximations to a smooth distribution . ( [ eq : synchfinal ] ) possesses two readily identifiable asymptotic limits , namely when and . these lead to the forms given in eq . ( [ eq : ntsynch_limits ] ) . now consider an angular distribution defined over the range for . the superposition of spectral forms in eq . ( [ eq : ntsynch_limits ] ) then immediately indicates that such an angular distribution must generate a spectrum with asymptotic forms at , and when . the spectrum in between depends on how rapidly varies with angle , and can be either of slope or steeper , but never flatter than and never steeper than . this follows from the convolution over angles of spectra that are monotonically declining in energy necessarily being also monotonically declining in . this assertion holds even for that is strongly peaked towards , and monotonically declining with . hence , angular distributions with uncorrelated with can not ameliorate the low energy index issue due to the spectral shape implied by eq . ( [ eq : synchfinal ] ) . a more viable possibility for flattening the low energy index is when there is a correlation between the pitch angle and the lorentz factor of charged particles . this provides a distinct kinematic difference from the foregoing considerations of synchrotron radiation from quasi - isotropic electron distributions . the archetypical example for consideration here is so - called _ pitch - angle synchrotron _ radiation , a mechanism explored in detail by epstein ( 1973 ; for applications , see epstein & petrosian 1973 ) . this mechanism corresponds to synchrotron emission from particles possessing very small pitch angles . the polarization - averaged emissivity derived by epstein ( 1973 ) in this limit , for electrons in a uniform magnetic field , can be written in the form @xmath15 this form is simply obtained from the flux emissivity in equation ( 10 ) of epstein ( 1973 ) , and is applicable for ; at higher energies , the usual synchrotron formula in eq . ( [ eq : synch_emiss ] ) is operable if . note that this process exhibits strong circular polarization due to the near coalignment of particles with the field , though there is significant linear polarization in narrow bands of photon energy . observe that defines the intrinsic energy scale of pitch angle synchrotron ( pas ) emission . ( [ eq : synch_pas_rate ] ) is virtually independent of for domains , thereby defining an extremely flat spectrum . this property is a direct consequence of the kinematic coupling , yielding a dependence that contrasts the isotropic synchrotron dependence . this weaker dependence on immediately implies an inference of stronger source fields in order to move the characteristic pas photon energy into the batse window . the spectrum drops dramatically above if , otherwise it merges into the synchrotron form if . these shapes imply ( i ) that prompt grb spectra that are flatter than below the peak ( i.e. around 98% of bursts : see figure [ fig : batse_low_index ] ) can be easily accommodated by a pitch angle synchrotron scenario ( just like the inverse compton scattering case considered in section [ sec : icformalism ] below ) , and ( ii ) accordingly that a variety of grb spectral shapes can be accurately modeled due to the characteristically narrow peaking of the pas emissivity in eq . ( [ eq : synch_pas_rate ] ) . these were conclusions of lloyd - ronning and petrosian ( 2002 ) , who explored fits to batse bursts for pitch angle synchrotron models , and addressed correlations between spectral parameters and temporal properties . hence , pitch angle synchrotron is an attractively versatile spectroscopic possibility for bursts . note that the mechanism of `` jitter '' radiation in turbulent magnetic fields ( medvedev 2000 ) possesses similar spectral properties due to the intrinsic kinematic coupling , thereby offering an alternative possibility of similar promise . pitch angle synchrotron might arise when electrons stochastically increase their pitch angle from virtually zero during an acceleration process . for it to provide the major contribution , a prevalence of small pitch angles must be strongly favored , i.e. the pitch angles must not be significantly populated , so that normal synchrotron emission does not dominate . it is not clear how this might come about , though rapid cooling and inefficient diffusion transverse to the field is an interesting possibility ( e.g. see lloyd - ronning and petrosian 2002 ) . in addition , small pitch angles must be prepared in the first instance , which suggests a coherent electrodynamic mode of acceleration as opposed to diffusive one . while pas may afford a means of enhancing the non - thermal radiative signal relative to the thermal component , a detailed exploration of pas spectral shapes and polarization for thermal and non - thermal distributions in the context of diffusive acceleration will be the subject of future work . while detailed exploration of cooling effects is beyond the scope of this paper , a brief discussion is appropriate . cooling is known to strongly influence spectral shape in quasi - isotropic synchrotron scenarios ( e.g. ghisellini , celotti & lazzati 2000 ) , introducing a second `` line of death '' with a value of . this presents problems for models invoking strong cooling in generating spectra like those seen by cgro . such models are most applicable to grb environments where the emission regions are somewhat remote from the acceleration ones . this is because even though synchrotron radiation is a remarkably efficient process , diffusive acceleration at shocks is even more so . accordingly , coincident acceleration and emission zones of the same physical scale can exhibit prolific acceleration up to some maximum lorentz factor , before radiative cooling in the magnetic field causes cessation of acceleration . the spectral turnover that marks this cessation is quasi - exponential in nature , and have not been observed in burst spectra to date . this combination acceleration / radiation scenario is widely envisaged in the contexts of x - ray and gamma - ray emission from supernova remnants and blazars . whenever multiple spatial or temporal scales are sampled , convolution of spectral contributions can blur the turnover into a broad distribution , essentially the case explored by ghisellini , celotti & lazzati ( 2000 ) . the rate of acceleration scales as the inverse gyrofrequency , which has a weaker dependence on electron lorentz factor than the synchrotron cooling rate . specifically , the acceleration timescale ( in seconds ) can be approximated by , where is the energy of the electrons in units of tev , is the shock speed in units of , is the mean magnetic field strength ( measured in gauss ) , and is a factor of order unity that accounts for corrections to the diffusive timescale appropriate for relativistic shocks . the synchrotron cooling timescale ( also in seconds ) is . various versions of these formulae are widely available , though a specific discussion of them in the context of blazars is in baring ( 2002 ) ; they are effectively applicable in the comoving frame of the burst outflow , as opposed to the observer s frame . the electron energy and the magnetic field are coupled by placing the synchrotron peak in the soft gamma - ray band , i.e. setting gauss . here is the bulk lorentz factor of the outflow . these quickly lead to the ratio estimate @xmath16 acceleration is clearly much more rapid than synchrotron cooling for typical , a property that changes only when considering electrons that emit above about 10 gev , i.e. for gauss . in the special case of , the result in eq . ( [ eq : cooling_ratio ] ) corresponds to the well - known synchrotron cooling cutoff property of the crab pulsar wind nebula ( e.g. see de jager et al . , 1996 ) , namely that the spectral turnover occurs at around 50 mev , independent of the magnetic field strength . since significant questions surround the viability of the synchrotron mechanism in explaining burst spectra , consideration of alternative emission processes is warranted . here , the focus is on inverse compton scattering , another very efficient radiative mechanism . for the purposes of the discussion here , it comes in two relevant varieties : scattering off a narrow - band soft photon distribution , and upscattering of synchrotron photons ( synchrotron self - compton , or ssc ) that provide an inherently broad seed spectrum . it shall be seen that the resulting predictions for prompt emission spectra for these two cases are manifestly different . the inverse compton ( ic ) mechanism possesses two obvious advantages over synchrotron radiation : ( i ) high values of can be avoided , since there is no requirement that the synchrotron peak appear in the gamma - ray band , and ( ii ) the low energy index can , in cases to be discerned in sections [ sec : icformalism ] and [ sec : alphalow_comp ] , be as flat as . at the same time , inverse compton scenarios ( particularly the ssc case ) have the disadvantage of requiring that synchrotron radiation or other components be unobservable at optical and lower wavebands during the prompt and early afterglow phases . the parameter constraints thereby imposed are discussed in section [ sec : constraint ] . the well - known criterion for ic to dominate synchrotron as an electron cooling mechanism ( i.e. also in total bolometric luminosity for a spatially uniform medium ) is simply that the energy density of the soft photons exceeds that of the ambient magnetic field , ( e.g. rybicki & lightman , 1979 ) . in general , the value of can vary enormously depending on the particular invocation for soft photon generation . for the specific case of a ssc model , couples to the field and can be determined by integrating in eq . ( [ eq : synch_emiss ] ) over and multiplying by some fiducial photon escape timescale , , that reflects the physical size of the emission region . for monoenergetic electrons of lorentz factor , the familiar result ( e.g. see p. 168 of rybicki & lightman , 1979 ) for the synchrotron energy loss rate can be used to write . hence , the ssc emission can dominate the bolometric luminosity for significant but not particularly large values of the product . it was precisely this property that led gonzalez et al . ( 2003 ) to argue that the intriguing hard gamma - ray component seen by the egret tasc in grb 941017 was not due to ssc emission , but perhaps due to inverse compton scattering seeded by an external soft photon source . the criterion for an ssc component to fall in the soft gamma - ray band is , which can easily accommodate fields in the gauss range for and . a more thorough exploration of ssc parameter spaces for burst prompt and afterglow emission can be found , for example , in mszros , rees , & papathanassiou ( 1994 ) , sari & esin ( 2001 ) and zhang & mszros ( 2001 ) . the formalism for the inverse compton ( ic ) emissivity in optically thin environs is readily available in many astrophysical textbooks , such as rybicki & lightman ( 1979 ) . since the description of ic polarization effects is more subtle than for synchrotron radiation , being dependent on anisotropies in the soft photon population , the developments here are restricted to cases where photon polarizations are summed over . the rate of emission , integrated over the angles of the upscattered photons , is independent of the direction of momentum of the seed photons . hence , no integration over is required , contrasting eq . ( [ eq : synch_emiss ] ) for synchrotron radiation . however , the rate is dependent on the soft photon energy , which must be integrated over , yielding the form ( in units of ) @xmath17 here is the thomson cross section , is the energy distribution of soft photons , and @xmath18\ ; \theta ( z ) \quad , \quad z\ ; = \ ; \dover{\erg}{4\gamma^2\erg_{\rm s}}\;\ ; , \label{eq : fdef}\ ] ] for a heaviside step function when and otherwise . mirroring the treatment of synchrotron radiation , while numerical evaluations of eq . ( [ eq : ic_emiss ] ) were performed using the electron distribution in eq . ( [ eq : elec_dist ] ) to obtain approximations to burst spectra in section [ sec : part_comp ] , asymptotic spectral indices are readily attainable . for monoenergetic soft photons , the non - thermal contribution to the inverse compton spectrum ( from the truncated power - law ) is dominant whenever , and assumes the following power - law forms : @xmath19 the index at high energies , , is identical to that for synchrotron radiation , since both mechanisms emit photons with the same dependence on the electron lorentz factor : . at low energies , the differential spectrum is approximately independent of the upscattered energy of the photon , due to the limit of and the fact that electrons near the cutoff dominate the low energy photon production . this index of has been known since the early days of application of inverse compton to astrophysical problems : see , for example , figure 3 of the comprehensive treatment of jones ( 1968 ) that also illustrates that the compton spectrum flattens further to in the domain of downscattering . as in the case of synchrotron radiation , the thermal component , sampled when , necessarily declines exponentially at photon energies well above the thermal peak , but possesses the same power - law dependence as in the non - thermal case for low photon energies : @xmath20 this follows because the low energy photons are produced by electrons mostly near the peak of the thermal distribution , again sampling const . from the perspective of spectral shapes at and below the gamma - ray peak , it is important to explore the properties of synchrotron self - compton ( ssc ) radiation , to distinguish its character from ic emission that is seeded by quasi - monoenergetic soft photons . here the analysis will first be confined to the case of a purely non - thermal electron distribution , i.e. regimes , where the distribution can be written in the form for and is zero otherwise . hereafter , when making the identification with the non - thermal portion of the distribution function in eq . ( [ eq : elec_dist ] ) , , and one can set and to establish a correspondence . for such a truncated power - law , a compact analytic form for the ssc spectrum was obtained , essentially reducing the quadruple integration to one over a single variable . defining a fiducial photon escape timescale , for a one - zone emission region of size , the average density of synchrotron photons that seed the ssc emission can be written as , so that the form in eq . ( [ eq : synchfinal ] ) can be directly inserted into eq . ( [ eq : ic_emiss ] ) . the analytic reduction is expounded in appendix a , with the result being @xmath21 \label{eq : sscfinal}\\[-5.5pt ] & \times & \biggl\ { \int_{0}^{\chi } dy \ , k_{5/3}(y ) p_{\delta } \bigl(\dover{y}{\chi}\bigr ) + \int_{\chi}^{\infty } dy \ , k_{5/3}(y ) q_{\delta } \bigl(\dover{\chi}{y}\bigr ) \ ; \biggr\}\;\ ; , \nonumber\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath22 is the effective scale for the rate of the synchrotron - self - compton process . here , is the thomson optical depth of the emission region . the emergent photon energy is encapsulated in a single dimensionless parameter @xmath23 that denotes the energy scale of the peak for ssc emission , which putatively could be in the gamma - ray band , and is the only spectral structure in the emissivity . the functions and are relatively compact and are given in eqs . ( [ eq : pdef ] ) and ( [ eq : qdef ] ) in appendix a in terms of elementary functions . ( [ eq : sscfinal ] ) can be routinely integrated numerically . asymptotic energy dependences of the ssc rate in eq . ( [ eq : sscfinal ] ) are readily obtained . in cases where , the term never contributes to the integration since it is exponentially suppressed by the behavior of the bessel function . accordingly , it is quickly deduced that the ssc spectrum approximately obeys at energies , as expected : a convolution of an extended synchrotron spectrum with a truncated power - law electron distribution with index is a power - law of index . there is a slight logarithmic modulation as outlined in eq . ( [ eq : sscnt_highchi ] ) . the limit can also be promptly obtained . the term samples only the asymptotic limit of the bessel function , i.e. the form . from this , it is quickly verified that the integration is proportional to . it is simple to show using the eqs . ( [ eq : pdef ] ) and ( [ eq : qdef ] ) in appendix a that the term possesses an identical dependence . the net result is , as embodied in eq . ( [ eq : sscnt_lowchi ] ) , a property that has been evident in various ssc models of bursts ( e.g. see sari & esin , 2001 ) . these two limits can be summarized via @xmath24 the low energy index images the synchrotron low energy tail , a result that is not surprising since such a tail is steeper ( and therefore its constituent photons are more populous ) than the tail resulting from ic upscattering of monoenergetic soft photons in eq . ( [ eq : ntic_limits ] ) . accordingly , the bound is placed on ssc spectra so that this mechanism can not aid with the low energy spectral index issues discussed in section [ sec : alphalow_synch ] . to facilitate the fitting of grb spectra with ssc spectra , the case of ultra - relativistic thermal particles must also be considered , for which the distribution can be written in the form . when making the identification with the thermal part of the distribution function in eq . ( [ eq : elec_dist ] ) , one can set and to establish a correspondence with correct normalization . in appendix b , an expedient derivation of the emission spectrum is offered , making use of the result already presented in eq . ( [ eq : sscfinal ] ) for a truncated power - law electron distribution . basically , the limit is taken to generate the spectrum for monoenergetic electrons , and this is then convolved with a relativistic maxwell - boltzmann distribution . setting @xmath25 as the effective scale for the rate of the synchrotron - self - compton process for the hot thermal particles , one arrives at @xmath26^{1/4}\bigr)\quad , \label{eq : sscfinal_th_too}\ ] ] where the function is defined in eq . ( [ eq : caljdef ] ) , and is steeply declining as increases . here , . asymptotic forms for the spectrum in eq . ( [ eq : sscfinal_th_too ] ) are routinely derived , being presented in eq . ( [ eq : sscthlimits ] ) . as expected , an form arises at energies below the characteristic energy , and the spectrum is a weakly declining exponential far above this . results for the spectral fitting of the grb 910503 data for the case of inverse compton scattering are presented in figure [ fig : ic_spec_dist ] . the fits were performed using the formalism presented in section [ sec : icformalism ] , specifically with numerical evaluations of eq . ( [ eq : ic_emiss ] ) . again , the multi - instrument , time - integrated cgro data as published in schaefer et al . ( 1998 ) was used . the figure displays both inverse compton emission spectra for the case of an isotropic , monoenergetic soft photon distribution , and the inferred electron distribution that generates the continuum . the solid curve depicts the case that would be required to explain the photon spectrum , with the overall normalization again being a free parameter ; this curve was offset slightly from the data for visual clarity . the electron distributions were normalized to unit area in space . the non - thermal particle distribution clearly dominates the thermal component in this `` fit , '' as is the case for synchrotron emission . the index was controlled by the egret data , and so is identical to that in fig . [ fig : synch_spec_dist ] . adjustment of the parameter to improve the appearance of the model approximation around and above the spectral peak led to the assumed value of , again accurate to around 15% . the positioning of the peak in energy produced the fit value , where is the lorentz factor associated with the bulk motion of the grb expansion . the parameter describing the relative normalization of the non - thermal and thermal components was found to be ( % ) , still a large value though only a tenth of that obtained for the synchrotron fit . the conclusion is essentially identical to that in section [ sec : part_synch ] : the observational data can only be accommodated by an electron distribution that has a preponderance of non - thermal electrons as fig . ( [ fig : ic_spec_dist]b ) . such a determination was also obtained for batse bursts grb 940619 ( trigger number 3035_6 ) and grb 940817 ( trigger number 3128_5 ) from the preece et al . ( 2000 ) catalog . moreover , the fits in figs . [ fig : synch_spec_dist ] and [ fig : ic_spec_dist ] are of comparable quality , at least below 1 mev and above 5 mev ; i.e. there is little potential in the cgro data to discriminate between the two emission mechanisms . there is a small bump / excess in the theoretical spectrum in fig . [ fig : ic_spec_dist ] just above 1 mev that is a consequence of the sharper inverse compton scattering kernel ; its prominence can be muted somewhat by slightly reducing both and the index . such a liberty may not be afforded in the glast era when burst spectral indices will be better constrained because of its broad energy range , sampled by the gamma - ray burst monitor ( gbm ) in the batse band and the large area telescope ( lat ) in the egret band . the last point to note is that the inverse compton fit is tolerated here because the low energy asymptotic index is possibly not fully realized in the batse window . the data possess a slight curvature that may be consistent with a continued flattening of the spectrum below 30 kev , as would be expected for the inverse compton mechanism . yet the data match the synchrotron emissivity also , indicating that batse can not discriminate between these two mechanisms on the basis of the soft gamma - ray portion of the bandwidth . this impasse should be addressed when swift is launched in the coming year . swift possesses the sensitivity in the critical 1 -100 kev band to probe the spectrum below the peak and afford diagnostics on the emission mechanism . furthermore , the spectral coverage afforded by the gbm and the lat on glast will also provide powerful observational constraints . the low energy asymptotic forms in eqs . ( [ eq : ntic_limits ] ) and ( [ eq : thic_limits ] ) raise the possibility that inverse compton emission can eliminate the so - called `` line of death '' problem that is pervasive in synchrotron models . the ic mechanism can accommodate low energy asymptotic indices as flat as , with steeper indices easily being generated by appropriately distributed electrons . the domain of compatibility is indicated in fig . [ fig : batse_low_index ] , where around 98% of batse burst spectra in the spectroscopy catalogue of preece et al . ( 2000 ) can be accounted for by the inverse compton process . this is an enticing property , but is not a definitive statement of the operation of this mechanism in grb prompt emission regions . it must be emphasized that the establishment of an domain is contingent upon the soft photons that seed the upscattering assuming a narrow energy ( i.e. quasi - monoenergetic ) distribution . this caveat is exemplified by the ssc value of being identical to that for synchrotron radiation due to the breadth of the synchrotron seed spectrum . hence invoking a synchrotron self - compton model only dramatically impacts the operating range of and not the spectral shape in the very soft gamma - rays . given the discussion in section [ sec : anis_synch ] pertaining to synchrotron radiation , it is natural to ask whether anisotropies in either the soft photon or electron populations can dramatically alter the spectrum . the inverse compton photon production rate in eq . ( [ eq : ic_emiss ] ) implicitly assumes isotropy of the soft photons constituting . furthermore , it assumes that the angular distribution of electrons is not seriously deficient along the line of sight to the observer ; i.e. that the viewing perspective is not towards the side of an electron jet . calculating ic spectra for anisotropic distributions is quite involved , and moreover sensitive to the choice of geometry . yet spectral behavior depends mostly on the interplay between such geometry and the kinematics of ic scattering . if the electron distribution is highly collimated and the observer s direction lies outside the cone of jet collimation , then the kinematics of scattering requires a smaller angle of scattering in the electron rest frame to send the photon towards the observer . this small yields a lower final photon energy in the observer s frame , so that the emitted inverse compton spectrum is softer outside the jet core . the spectrum then flattens at lower energies ( e.g. see dermer & schlickeiser 1993 ; baring 1994 for blazar contexts ) due to the kinematic depletion of photons in the observer s direction , and can be even slightly flatter than . a problem with this scenario immediately arises : the energetics are dominated by emission in the jet cone so that assuming `` off - axis '' ic emission places more severe constraints on the grb radiative efficiency . note that fluctuations in the jet orientation or structure would lead to the emergent inverse compton spectra being highly variable both in flux ( observed in bursts and therefore not a problem , in principle ) and in spectral shape any structure such as the peak would be expected to vary in time rapidly in energy due to the scattering kinematics . while modest fluctuations ( as opposed to hard - to - soft evolution ) are present in gamma - ray burst prompt emission , detailed modeling would be required to discern whether they could match those produced by anisotropic scattering scenarios . any anisotropy in the soft photon population is not sampled until they become more collimated than the electrons ; only then does the emissivity change appreciably from eq . ( [ eq : ic_emiss ] ) . then , electrons within the photon `` cone '' of beaming experience an almost full range of incident photon angles in their rest frames , so that they contribute an inverse compton spectrum similar to that for isotropic soft photons . however , the majority of electrons lie outside this cone , and for these , collisions with photons are predominantly head - on , leading to a depletion of the softer photons from the overall inverse compton spectrum just as with electron collimation . hence , one expects that such soft photon anisotropies could in principal also flatten the spectrum below the peak . to provide a meaningful comparison with the preceding mechanisms , grb 910503 is again used as a focal point . yet , so as to provide a variation , here a case study for another egret burst , grb 910601 is also presented . results for the spectral fitting for synchrotron self - compton scattering are presented in figure [ fig : ssc_spec_dist ] . the `` fits '' were performed using the formalism presented in section [ sec : sscformalism ] , specifically with numerical evaluations of eqs . ( [ eq : sscfinal ] ) and ( [ eq : sscfinal_th_too ] ) . the figure displays the ssc emission spectra for the case of an isotropic electron distribution , for each burst . the solid curve depicts the case that would most closely explain the photon spectrum , with the overall normalization again being a free parameter . due to the strong dependence of the characteristic energy on electron lorentz factor , the values of required to move the ssc peak into the gamma - ray band lead to inferences of sub - gauss fields if . consider first grb 910503 . the most obvious features are that the `` fit '' is more difficult than for the emission mechanisms previously considered , with poor results for the lower energies much below the peak , and that the thermal contribution must be dramatically suppressed . the cause is easily identified : the ssc spectrum is intrinsically much broader than either the ic or synchrotron spectra . this is due to the characteristic energy for ssc embodied in the dimensionless parameter ( see equation [ [ eq : chidef ] ] ) scaling as ( or for the thermal case ) . consequently , small changes in the electron near the peak of the maxwell - boltzmann distribution incur large variations in the ssc photon energy so that the spectral peak is broad . this effect is manifested in the non - thermal ssc emissivity in eq . ( [ eq : sscfinal ] ) , which leads to the excesses evident around 30 kev in the `` fits '' of figure [ fig : ssc_spec_dist ] , and more profoundly for the thermal ssc contribution , which is extremely broad . from eq . ( [ eq : sscthlimits ] ) a notable conclusion can be drawn : that the thermal ssc spectrum in the depicted representation only starts to fall above around 30 mev , and then only slowly , i.e. it is blueward of the peak from the non - thermal ssc contribution . this drives the requisite dramatic suppression of the normalization of a thermal component to the underlying electron distribution , leading to the same issues ( but in this case more strikingly emphasized ) for acceleration from thermal energies that were discussed above . note that for values of , a comparably satisfactory ssc fit can be obtained with . observe that for such a large , the tail of the thermal maxwellian emerges above that of the non - thermal distribution for a small range of lorentz factors . the situation for grb 910601 is even more constrained , due to the markedly steeper gamma - ray spectrum . the thermal electrons must be even less populous to accommodate the comptel and egret data , and the non - thermal electrons must possess a very steep index , considerably steeper than the required for a synchrotron fit . in fact , both the synchrotron and ic models had much greater success fitting the grb 910601 data , though are not depicted . steepening the index to produces only marginal improvement in the fit . the inevitable conclusion of this analysis is that the breadth of the ssc emissivity for even monoenergetic electrons ( derived in equation ( [ eq : sscfinal_mono ] ) , and closely approximated by the case in figure [ fig : ssc_spec_dist ] ) is large enough to provide significant or severe problems for the ssc interpretation of prompt emission from gamma - ray bursts . this contention is not based solely on the grb 910503 and in particular the grb 910601 data ; the similarity of the spectra of grb 910814 ( schaefer et al . 1998 ) and grb 990123 ( briggs et al . 1999 ) to that of grb 910601 strongly suggests that a spectroscopic incompatibility of the ssc mechanism for prompt emission may be commonplace , specifically for differential burst spectra steeper than around above the peak . bursts such as the superbowl one ( grb 930131 ) with high energy index may be much more compatible with an ssc scenario . while this assessment may achieve closure in the swift / glast era , a caveat is possibly provided if the synchrotron continuum is strongly self - absorbed . this is the scenario envisaged by panaitescu & meszaros ( 2000 ) and liang , boettcher & kocevski ( 2003 ) , with the latter group suggesting that ssc with moderate optical depths ( ) could explain x - ray excesses seen in some burst spectra . with such strong absorption , the supply of soft photons for inverse compton upscattering is more sharply peaked than even the synchrotron continuum from electrons possessing a truncated power - law distribution , thereby approximately mimicking the pure inverse compton spectral shapes explored in section [ sec : part_comp ] . the requirement that self - absorption be effective in narrowing the synchrotron self - compton peak is that the turnover energy exceeds that of the synchrotron peak , which is below the x - ray band . using eq . ( [ eq : selfabs_energy ] ) , one quickly arrives at the requisite condition : @xmath27 for @xmath28 here is the energy of the peak in the prompt emission . for , one deduces that , so that optical depths can be tolerated for typical without pushing too low , i.e. into the mildly - relativistic regime . detailed computations of self - absorbed ssc spectra are deferred to future work . in addition to the soft gamma - ray spectral shape , a probing diagnostic on the emission mechanisms is whether their extrapolation down to the optical band can be accommodated by optical monitoring data for bursts . such broadband constraints turn out not to be profoundly limiting for synchrotron or pure inverse compton emission . however , they do impact ssc models , since these can potentially have a prominent synchrotron component in the optical that might violate upper bounds or , in the case of grb 990123 , prompt optical detections . it is straightforward to assess how optical band data can constrain ssc model parameters using the formalism derived here . first , the focus is on observational data . grb 990123 ( with redshift ) is to date the only burst with a prompt optical detection ( akerlof et al . 1999 ) , peaking at around magnitude 8.8 some 47 seconds after batse trigger and contemporaneous with the batse signal . these prompt observations were made by the robotic optical transient search experiment - i ( rotse - i ) . the recent bright burst grb 030329 ( redshift ) was only detected optically by rotse - iii in the afterglow epoch at visual magnitude 12.5 over an hour after the burst trigger on hete-2 ( smith et al . kehoe et al . ( 2001 ) report upper bounds of around magnitude 1315 to half a dozen bursts , in two cases starting just 15 - 20 seconds after trigger . these low limiting magnitudes can potentially be severely constraining on models with a high optical to gamma - ray flux expectation , though contemporaneous multiwavelength detections are requisite for unambiguous diagnostics . taking magnitude 9 as a benchmark optical signal for the purposes of exploring broadband constraints , a number that must be considered modulo the source distance and intrinsic luminosity , this corresponds to a differential photon flux of the order of photons sec@xmath29 @xmath30 kev@xmath29 at around 2ev . this can be compared with the batse spectrum of grb 910503 , a burst brighter than most of those in the sample of kehoe et al . ( 2001 ) , which has a time - integrated differential flux of photons sec@xmath29 @xmath30 kev@xmath29 at around 100 kev . the interpolation between such an optical magnitude and gamma - ray flux is a roughly spectrum . immediately , one infers that synchrotron and inverse compton models for the gamma - rays can accommodate such an optical magnitude ; only limiting magnitudes of around 19 or higher can provide conflicts for these mechanisms . note that a similar conclusion would apply for pitch angle synchrotron models , which possess very flat low energy asymptotic spectra like inverse compton scenarios . the situation for ssc broadband spectra is very different . the ratio of the energy of the ssc peak to that of the synchrotron peak is simply of the order , which would set the synchrotron peak in the infra - red for lorentz factors of , independent of the bulk flow . lower can move the synchrotron peak into the optical and even the uv . the ratio of emissivities at the synchrotron and ssc peaks is quickly determined from equations ( [ eq : ndotsyn_def ] ) and ( [ eq : ndotsscdef ] ) to be in the notations of this paper , i.e. with . hence , for , the peaks of the two components would lie roughly on an spectrum . moreover , opting for to position a synchrotron peak in the optical window , normalizing to the batse spectrum of grb 910503 would yield a count rate an order of magnitude below the magnitude 9 benchmark posited above . at face value , this would render the ssc scenario compatible with limiting magnitudes of around 11 for this source . yet comptonization of the spectrum is not evident in the gamma - rays , so it is inferred that , thereby increasing the ratio and lowering the permissible limiting magnitude for a viable ssc model . accordingly , for the only source with a prompt optical detection , grb 990123 , for the ssc model not to overestimate the observed optical flux , the synchrotron peak has to move somewhat out of the optical , though not much . this amounts to a modest constraint in phase space that can be quickly deduced , though at this juncture is not particularly enlightening ; such an exercise will be more timely once swift is providing a number of simultaneous hard x - ray and optical detections of bursts . the interpretative modeling presented here provides a strong indication that the synchrotron and inverse compton processes may provide a more viable explanation of prompt burst spectra than the ssc mechanism . the spectroscopic bias against ssc is due to its inherently broad character around the peak , and is only marginally constrained by broad - band considerations , i.e. limiting magnitudes in the optical band . however , strong self - absorption of the synchrotron component can provide an escape clause for ssc scenarios , though this imposes significant fine - tuning of parameter space . inverse compton provides an attractive possibility for the vast majority of bursts , as does pitch angle synchrotron emission , though quasi - isotropic synchrotron radiation may only be reconciled with around 2/3 of bursts at the lowest energies in the batse window . discrimination between these processes may prove possible after swift launches and in the glast era , though polarimetric measurements would enhance the diagnostic capability of observations . in analyzing ssc spectral models , attractively compact analytic forms for the synchrotron self - compton emissivity from thermal and truncated power - law electron distributions were developed ; these will prove useful for applications of ssc spectral models to a variety of astrophysical environments . a distinctive conclusion of this work is that agreeable `` fits '' with either synchrotron or inverse compton emission scenarios are only attainable if the underlying electron distribution is profoundly dominated by a non - thermal component . this result is in contradistinction with standard understanding of acceleration mechanisms such as the diffusive ( fermi ) process at shocks , where the non - thermal particles are drawn probabilistically from the shocked thermal population , and therefore are subdominant in number . this constraint has profound implications for any proposed grb model , providing a challenge for theorists in an era when computational resources are permitting new avenues for exploration using intensive numerical simulations of particle acceleration at shocks . this work was supported by the nsf extragalactic astrophysics program . matthew braby acknowledges the support of a shell foundation scholarship towards this research during his undergraduate degree at rice university . we thank the referee , rob preece , for insightful and constructive suggestions for polishing the paper , and nicole lloyd - ronning , jerry fishman and demos kazanas for reading through the manuscript and providing helpful comments . we also thank brad schaefer for supplying the grb 910503 compilation data prior to its publication in 1998 . in this appendix , developments leading to the form in eq . ( [ eq : sscfinal ] ) for the rate of synchrotron self - compton emission from a truncated power - law distribution of electrons are expounded . the starting point is the insertion of times the synchrotron rate in eq . ( [ eq : synchfinal ] ) , serving as the soft photon density , directly into the expression in eq . ( [ eq : ic_emiss ] ) for the inverse compton emissivity . this presents a triple integral that can be reduced to a compact single integration by appropriate manipulations . the lorentz factor of the electron that upscatters the synchrotron photons proves to be a less convenient integration variable than , which is defined in eq . ( [ eq : fdef ] ) . likewise , to proves expedient to use @xmath31 as an integration variable , rather than the synchrotron photon energy . performing these two changes of variables leads quickly to an ssc emissivity of @xmath32 where is the ssc rate scale factor given in eq . ( [ eq : ndotsscdef ] ) , and is the dimensionless ssc energy variable defined in eq . ( [ eq : chidef ] ) . here , and the maximum value of can be written @xmath33 the -integration over the inverse compton scattering kernel leads to a definition of : @xmath34 \label{eq : gzdef}\\[-5.5pt ] g_{\delta}(z ) & = & \dover{2z}{\delta+3}\ ; \biggl ( 2\log_ez + \dover{\delta-1}{\delta+3 } \biggr ) + \dover{2}{\delta+1 } - \dover{4z^2}{\delta+5}\quad , \nonumber\end{aligned}\ ] ] the integration can be reduced by noting that the definitions of and establish two critical values of , namely and . which delineate distinct dependences of the integrand on . the relative ordering of and depends on the value of assumed : and . this naturally divides the integration into two ranges , , and . the developments are straightforward , and are facilitated using an function defined via @xmath35 \label{eq : hzdef}\\[-5.5pt ] h_{\delta}(z ) & = & \dover{4z}{(\delta+3)^2}\ ; \biggl ( 2\log_ez + \dover{\delta-5}{\delta+3 } \biggr ) + \dover{4}{(\delta+1)^2 } - \dover{8z^2}{(\delta+5)^2}\quad .\nonumber\end{aligned}\ ] ] the case requires an integration by parts in one contributing interval , and one quickly arrives at the compact form @xmath36 i.e. eq . ( [ eq : sscfinal ] ) , using the following functional forms ( with and defined as just above ) : @xmath37\ , g_{\delta}(1 ) + h_{\delta}(1)\,\biggr\ } \;\ ; , \label{eq : pdef}\ ] ] for , and for @xmath38 + h_{\delta}(z)\,\biggr\ } \quad , \nonumber\\[-5.5pt ] \label{eq : qdef}\\[-5.5pt ] & = & - 2z\,\dover { \delta + 1}{(\delta + 3)^2}\biggl [ 2 \ , \log_ez - \dover{\delta + 11}{\delta + 3 } \biggr ] - 4 \dover{\delta -1}{(\delta + 1)^2 } -2 \dover{\log_ez}{\delta + 1 } + 2z^2\ , \dover{\delta + 1}{(\delta + 5)^2}\quad .\nonumber\end{aligned}\ ] ] observe that as , , as demanded by continuity of the spectrum . asymptotic dependences of the ssc rate on the upscattered photon energy , encapsulated in the proportionalities of eq . ( [ eq : ntssc_limits ] ) , can be simply derived . in the limit , both the and terms contribute to eq . ( [ eq : sscfinal_app ] ) , with the integrals being dominated by the domain . the bessel function can be replaced by its power - law asymptotic form , resulting in elementary integrals . for the integration converges to @xmath39 the case is less simple , though the integration over does not contribute significantly since it is exponentially suppressed by the dependence of the bessel function . the integration can be developed using identity 6.561.16 of gradshteyn and ryzhik ( 1980 ) , which can be specialized to the case appropriate for this analysis : @xmath40 the derivative of this with respect to can also be used to expedite the developments , and can be written in the form @xmath41 where is the digamma function . setting , since the upper limit to the can be replaced by infinity , one readily arrives at the result @xmath42 \label{eq : sscnt_highchi}\\[-5.5pt ] & & \hbox{\hskip 0pt } - \dover{1}{2 } \psi \biggl ( \dover{\delta}{4 } + \dover{19}{12}\biggr ) - \dover{1}{2 } \psi \biggl ( \dover{\delta}{4 } - \dover{1}{12}\biggr)\ , \biggr ] \ , g_{\delta}(1)+ h_{\delta}(1 ) \biggr\}\ ; \dover{\ndotssc}{\chi^{(\delta + 1)/2}}\quad , \quad \chi\,\gg\ , 1\;\ ; .\nonumber\end{aligned}\ ] ] the logarithmic term will clearly dominate for extremely large values of . the comparison of synchrotron self - compton ( ssc ) models invoking shock acceleration with burst spectra requires also the ssc rate for relativistically hot thermal particles , which implies using a four - dimensional integral defined by inserting the thermal contribution to eq . ( [ eq : elec_dist ] ) into eq . ( [ eq : synch_emiss ] ) and then the result subsequently into eq . ( [ eq : ic_emiss ] ) . rather than laboriously reducing the integral along the lines of the developments of appendix a , the result in eq . ( [ eq : sscfinal_app ] ) can be used to advantage . taking the limit generates the ssc emissivity for monoenergetic electrons with lorentz factor . the result can then be convolved with the thermal electron distribution to yield the required emissivity . as becomes very large , approaches zero at all positive less than unity , so that the integration over in eq . ( [ eq : sscfinal_app ] ) does not contribute . using the result @xmath43 the integration over the thermal electron distribution produces a double integral that can be evaluated by reversing the order of integrations , yielding @xmath26^{1/4}\bigr)\quad , \label{eq : sscfinal_th}\ ] ] where is given in eq . ( [ eq : ndotsscdef ] ) , , and @xmath44 \label{eq : caljdef}\\[-5.5pt ] & \equiv & 2\dover{e^{-\kappa}}{\kappa } \int_0^{\infty } \dover{e^{-v}s(v)}{\kappa + v}\ , dv \ ; = \ ; 2\dover{e^{-\kappa}}{\kappa^3 } \int_0^{\infty } \dover{e^{-v } \ , v^2\ , s(v)}{\kappa + v}\ , dv \quad , \nonumber\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath45 the first integral defining can be expressed as a sum of incomplete gamma functions and one of their derivatives , using identities 3.381.3 and 4.358.1 of gradshteyn and ryzhik ( 1980 ) , though this does not expedite the evaluation of . however , the integral representation of the incomplete gamma function in 8.353.3 of gradshteyn and ryzhik ( 1980 ) proves useful , leading to the alternative integral forms posited on the second line of eq . ( [ eq : caljdef ] ) . these latter forms are readily amenable to numerical computation in a fashion similar to evaluation of euler s integral form for the gamma function . note that the first form on the second line is expedient for cases , while the second form on this line , which was obtained using the fact that the integrals of and on are identically zero , is advantageous for evaluation when . asymptotic forms for are simply obtained : for , and for . the appropriate asymptotic limits of eq . ( [ eq : sscfinal_th ] ) can then be quickly determined : @xmath46 ^ 2\;\chit^{-2/3}\;\ ; , & $ \quad \chit\ll 1\quad , \vphantom{\biggl(}$\cr \dover{8\pi}{\sqrt{5}}\ ; \dover{2^{9/10}}{\chit^{4/5}}\ ; \exp \biggl\ { -\dover{5}{2^{8/5}}\ ; \chit^{1/5 } \biggr\}\;\ ; , & $ \quad \chit\gg 1\quad , \vphantom{\biggl(}$\cr } \label{eq : sscthlimits}\ ] ] where the low argument power - law dependence for the bessel function is used when , and the method of steepest descents is employed to derive the case , for which the exponential portion of is sampled . note that the ssc emissivity for a monoenergetic electron distribution can be determined by omitting the convolution with the thermal distribution , so that eq . ( [ eq : qlimit ] ) can be used efficaciously to yield @xmath47 as is a monotonically decreasing function of on , for it flattens the ssc spectrum relative to that for synchrotron emission , and so effects a broadening of the peak . this monoenergetic formula can be convolved with arbitrary electron distributions to obtain resultant synchrotron emissivities . by the same token , eq . ( [ eq : sscfinal_th ] ) can be used to facilitate a laplace transform approach for special cases for the electron distribution . akerlof , c. , et al . 1999 , @xmath48398 , 400 . band , d. , et al . 1993 , @xmath48413 , 281 . baring , m. g. 1988a , @xmath48235 , 51 . baring , m. g. 1988b , @xmath48235 , 79 . baring , m. g. 1990 , @xmath48244 , 49 . baring , m. g. 1994 , in _ proc . of the second compton symposium _ , eds . gehrels , n. & norris , j. , ( aip conf . 304 , new york ) p. 639 . baring , m. g. 1995 , proc . of the erice nato asi _ currents in high energy astrophysics , eds . shapiro , m. , wefel , j. and silberberg , r. , ( kluwer academic , dordrecht ) p. 21 . baring , m. g. 1999 , in _ proc . of the 26th international cosmic ray conference _ , vol . iv , p. 5 , held in salt lake city , utah . baring , m. g. 2002 , pub . @xmath4819 , 60 . baring , m. g. , ellison , d. c. & jones , f. c. 1993 , @xmath48409 , 327 . baring , m. g. , ogilvie , k. w. , ellison , d. c. , & forsyth , r. j. 1997 , @xmath48476 , 889 . bekefi , g. 1966 , _ radiation processes in plasmas , _ ( wiley and sons , new york ) blandford , r. d. & eichler , d. 1987 , phys . @xmath48154 , 1 . brainerd , j. j. & lamb , d. q. 1987 , @xmath48313 , 231 . brainerd , j. j. & petrosian , v. 1987 , @xmath48320 , 703 . briggs , m. s. , et al . 1999 , @xmath48524 , 82 . crider , a. & liang , e. p. 1999 , @xmath48138 , 405 . de jager , o. c. , et al . 1996 , @xmath48457 , 253 . dermer , c. d. , chiang , j. & bttcher , m. 1999 , @xmath48513 , 656 . dermer , c. d. & schlickeiser , r. 1993 @xmath48416 , 209 . drury , l. oc . @xmath4846 , 973 . ellison , d. c. , baring , m. g. & jones , f. c. 1996 , @xmath48473 , 1029 . ellison , d. c. & double , g. p. 2002 , @xmath4818 , 213 . ellison , d. c. , jones , f. c. , & reynolds , s. p. 1990 , @xmath48360 , 702 . ellison , d. c. , mbius , e. , & paschmann , g. 1990 , @xmath48352 , 376 . epstein , r. i. 1973 , @xmath48183 , 593 . epstein , r. i. & petrosian , v. 1973 , @xmath48183 , 611 . forman , m. a. , jokipii , j. r. & owens , a. j. 1974 , @xmath48192 , 535 . gallant , y. a. , hoshino , m. , langdon , a. b. , arons , j. & max , c. e. 1992 , @xmath48391 , 73 . ghisellini , g. , celotti , a. & lazzati , d. 2000 , @xmath48313 , l1 . giacalone , j. , burgess , d. , schwartz , s. j. & ellison , d. c. 1992 , @xmath4819 , 433 . giacalone , j. , burgess , d. , schwartz , s. j. & ellison , d. c. 1993 , @xmath48402 , 550 . goodman , j. 1986 , @xmath48308 , l47 . gonzalez , m. m. , et al . 2003 , @xmath48424 , 749 . gosling , j. t. , et al . 1981 , @xmath4886 , 547 . gradshteyn , i. s. and ryzhik , i. m. 1980 , _ table of integrals , series and products _ , ( academic press , new york ) granot , j. , piran , t. & sari , r. 2000 , @xmath48534 , l163 . hoshino , m. , arons , j. , gallant , y. a. & langdon , a. b. 1992 , @xmath48390 , 454 . hoshino , m. & shimada , n. 2002 , @xmath48572 , 880 . jackson , j. d. 1975 , _ classical electrodynamics , _ ( wiley and sons , new york ) jokipii , j. r. , kta , j. , & giacalone , j. 1993 , @xmath4820 , 1759 . jones , f. c. 1968 , @xmath48167 , 1159 . jones , f. c. & ellison , d. c. 1991 , @xmath4858 , 259 . jones , f. c. , jokipii , j. r. & baring , m. g. 1998 , @xmath48509 , 238 . kang , h. & jones , t. w. 1997 , @xmath48476 , 875 . kehoe , r. , et al . 2001 , @xmath48554 , l159 . kucharek , h. , & scholer , m. 1995 , @xmath48100 , 1745 . liang , e. p. , boettcher , m. & kocevski , d. 2003 , in _ gamma - ray burst and afterglow astronomy 2001 _ , eds . g. r. ricker & r. k. vanderspek ( aip conf . 662 ) , p. 295 . liewer , p. c. , goldstein , b. e. & omidi , n. 1993 , @xmath4898 , 15,211 . lloyd , n. m. & petrosian , v. 2000 , @xmath48543 , 722 . medvedev , m. v. 2000 , @xmath48540 , 704 . mszros , p. 2001 , science @xmath48291 , 79 . mszros , p. , rees , m. j. & papathanassiou , h. 1994 , @xmath48432 , 181 . pacyski , b. 1986 , @xmath48308 , l43 . panaitescu , a. & mszros , p. 2000 , @xmath48544 , l17 . pavlov , g. g. & golenetskii , s. v. 1986 , @xmath48128 , 341 . piran , t. 1999 , phys . @xmath48314 , 575 . preece , r. d. , et al . 1998 , @xmath48506 , l23 . preece , r. d. , et al . 2000 , @xmath48126 , 19 . preece , r. d. , et al . 2002 , @xmath48581 , 1248 . rees , m. j. , & mszros 1992 , @xmath48258 , 41 . rybicki , g. b. & lightman , a. p. 1979 , _ radiative processes in astrophysics , _ ( wiley and sons , new york ) sari , r. & esin , a. 2001 , @xmath48548 , 787 . schaefer , b. e. , et al . 1998 , @xmath48492 , 696 . scholer , m. , trattner , k. j. & kucharek , h. 1992 , @xmath48395 , 675 . shimada , n. & hoshino , m. 2000 , @xmath48543 , l67 . shimada , n. , et al . 1999 , @xmath48264 , 481 . smith , d. a. et al . 2003 , @xmath48596 , l151 . tavani , m. 1996a , @xmath4876 , 3478 . tavani , m. 1996b , @xmath48466 , 768 . terasawa , t. , et al . 2001 , in proc . 27th international cosmic ray conference , ( copernicus gesellschaft , germany ) , sh2.3/sh119 [ see _ http://www.copernicus.org/icrc/program.htm_ ] trattner , k. j. & scholer , m. 1991 , @xmath4818 , 1817 . trattner , k. j. & scholer , m. 1993 , ann . geophysicae @xmath4811 , 774 . westfold , k. c. 1959 , @xmath48130 , 241 . zhang , b. & mszros , p. 2001 , @xmath48559 , 110 . _ Abstract:

Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.

Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered . Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video . Paper: ltude de la distribution des points rationnels sur les varits algbriques est un sujet classique de la gomtrie diophantienne . beaucoup de varits do nt le fibr anticanonique est gros vrifient le principe de batyrev - manin @xcite avec la constante de peyre @xcite , y compris les varits toriques lisses projectives ( voir @xcite pour des exemples ) . plus prcisment , soit @xmath1 une telle varit dfinie sur un corps de nombres @xmath2 munie dune hauteur de weil @xmath3 associe au fibr anticanonique @xmath4 . on dit que @xmath1 vrifie le principe de batyrev - manin sil existe un ouvert dense @xmath5 de @xmath1 tel que @xmath6 o la constante @xmath7 a reu une interprtation gomtrique ( cf . @xcite,@xcite ) . la raison pour laquelle on ne considre pas tous les points de la varit est que souvent il existe des sous - varits , que lon appelle ici _ globalement accumulatrice _ , do nt la croissance du nombre de points rationnels domine celle dun ouvert dense . on peut dfinir certaines constantes ( par exemple , la constante @xmath8 dans @xcite ) pour dtecter de telles varits . soit @xmath5 louvert priv de toutes les sous - varits globalement accumulatrices ( si un tel ouvert existe ) . une extension naturelle de ce problme est de considrer la convergence au sens faible de la suite de mesures de probabilit @xmath9 si cette suite de mesures converge , elle reflte un phnomne dquidistribution , et en regardant la densit de la mesure limite on peut obtenir une caractrisation de la concentration des points rationnels . peyre @xcite a conjectur une mesure limite , appele mesure de tamagawa . ce texte est concern par un autre aspect , savoir le problme de la distribution _ locale _ des points rationnels autour dun point rationnel fix . le terme local est au sens de lapproximation diophantienne systmatiquement formul en premier par d. mckinnon et m. roth ( @xcite , @xcite ) . une diffrence majeure par rapport aux problmes globaux est que mme sil nexiste pas de sous - varits globalement accumulatrices , il peut y avoir des sous - varits qui sont _ localement _ accumulatrices . moralement , les meilleurs approximants ne peuvent tre choisis que sur telles sous - varits . comme dans le problme global , on peut aussi dfinir certaines constantes , appeles maintenant _ les constantes dapproximation _ , pour les caractriser . lune de des constantes , appele _ la constante dapproximation _ @xmath10 ( dfinition [ pd : appconstant ] ) , caractrise la meilleure approximation . la deuxime constante , appele _ la constante essentielle _ @xmath11 ( dfinition [ df : essential ] ) , dcrit des approximations gnriques . au niveau de la distribution plus fine , s. pagelot @xcite a tudi en premier _ la distribution locale _ des points rationnels sur certaines varits algbriques via une opration appele zoom . le but est de dnombrer et localiser asymptotiquement les points le plus proches dun point rationnel fix . elle nous permet dobtenir plus dinformations sur la concentration locale des points rationnels que les constantes dapproximation car il existe des sous - varits ayant la mme constante dapproximation , sur lesquelles le nombre dapproximants qui se trouvent tant dordre de grandeur diffrente . on propose une dfinition ( dfinition [ df : weaklocal ] ) base sur ce fait pour les caractriser . dans ce texte on se placera sur une surface torique dfinie sur @xmath12 que lon notera toujours @xmath13 . elle est obtenue en clatant les @xmath14 points invariants de @xmath0 , qui correspond aux ventails ] on choisit le relev du point @xmath15\times[1:1]$ ] de lorbite ouverte que lon va approcher . comme conjectur par d. mckinnon ( conjecture [ conj : mckinnon ] _ infra _ ) , les courbes rationnelles donnent les meilleurs approximants . en effet , nous dmontrons quil existe @xmath14 courbes rationnelles @xmath16 passant par @xmath17 de degr anticanonique minimal qui donnent des meilleures approximations . alors quen dehors des @xmath18 , les approximants optimaux sont peu nombreux et se situent sur une famille de courbes nodales en @xmath17 de degr bas do nt la runion est dense dans @xmath13 . elles sont obtenues en considrant les courbes nodales do nt les tangentes au point @xmath17 ont les pentes irrationnelles . autrement dit , les points au - dessus de la dsingularisation en @xmath17 nest pas dfinies sur @xmath12 ( en fait ils sont dfinis sur une extension quadratique de @xmath12 ) . avant desquisser la formulation de la distribution locale afin pour noncer notre thorme principal , nous considrons dabord un exemple particulier @xmath19 . on fixe le point @xmath20 $ ] et la hauteur de weil comme @xmath21)=\max(|x|,|y|,|z|),\quad \operatorname{\operatorname{pgcd}}(x , y , z)=1.\ ] ] on sintresse lensemble des points rationnels de hauteur borne @xmath22\in{\mathbb{p}}^2({\mathbb{q}}):h(p)\leqslant b\}.\ ] ] un calcul nous dit que les points le plus proches de @xmath17 sont une distance de lordre de @xmath23 . nous invitons les lecteurs consulter ( * ? ? ? * figure 1 ) pour un dessin de la rpartition des points de hauteur borne autour de @xmath17 , o nous observons que les points se rpartissent apparemment de prfrence sur les droites rationnelles . lide est quaprs une manipulation de zoom , on peut dfinir une suite de mesures dcrivant la distribution asymptotique des points proches de @xmath17 . soit @xmath1 une bonne varit munie dune hauteur de weil @xmath3 . on fixe un point @xmath24 approcher et un diffomorphisme local @xmath25 de la varit en @xmath17 sur le plan tangent @xmath26 qui envoie @xmath17 sur lorigine . pour @xmath27 et @xmath28 , on dfinit la suite de mesures de dirac par la formule suivante : @xmath29 en gnral on ne prend que les @xmath30 tels que @xmath31 parce que sinon on est ramen des sous - varits strictes ( proposition [ po : weakzoom ] ) . on fixe une distance euclidienne @xmath32 sur @xmath33 ( qui est quivalente localement toute distance projective dfinie sur @xmath1 ) . on note @xmath34 la boule centre en lorigine de rayon @xmath35 et @xmath36 la fonction caractristique associe . sil existe @xmath37 tels que @xmath38 pour une infinit de @xmath39 , ils dcrivent la grandeur daccumulation des points rationnels autour de @xmath17 . on renormalise en considrant la suite de mesures @xmath40 si elles convergent ( au sens faible ) vers une mesure non - nulle , on lappellera _ la mesure limite_. le phnomne gnral serait que quand @xmath41 , ( le zoom est _ sous - critique _ , dfinition [ def : criticalzoom ] ) , @xmath42 aurait lordre de grandeur attendu et la rpartition des points rationnels serait plus uniforme . le cas o @xmath43 ( le zoom est _ critique _ ) est particulirement intressant . s. pagelot a tudi dans @xcite la distribution locale dun @xmath44-point sur la droite projective et sur des surfaces de del pezzo ( toriques ) de degr @xmath45 . en particulier pour @xmath19 il a affirm ( pour le zoom critique ) lexistence de la mesure limite attendue de masse concentre sur les droites ( ceci est redmontr dans @xcite ) . il est naturel de se poser la mme question pour les points algbriques et pour les varits de dimension suprieure . lauteur a tudi dans @xcite ce problme pour une surface de del pezzo torique de degr @xmath46 et il a obtenu pour le cas @xmath43 une mesure limite . [ notationcqbx ] on note @xmath47 lespace vectoriel des fonctions continues de support compact dfinie sur @xmath48 valeurs relles . on nonce le thorme principal du texte . [ th : maintheorem ] on a @xmath49 . soit @xmath50 . soit @xmath30 le facteur de zoom . alors 1 . si @xmath51 , on a que pour toute @xmath52 , @xmath53 il nexiste pas de mesure limite dans ce cas . si @xmath54 , alors il existe une constante @xmath550,1\mathclose[$ ] telle que pour toute positive @xmath56 , @xmath57 o @xmath58 est une mesure absolument continue par rapport la mesure de lebesgue planaire . en combinant avec le rsultat de pagelot ( thorme [ th : pagelot ] ) , on trouve que @xmath59 pour toute positive @xmath60 . ceci implique le nombre dapproximants sur les @xmath18 domine celui dans le complmentaire bien que leur constantes dapproximation concident . remarquons que daprs lheuristique nave du principe de batyrev - manin ( cf . ) , on souhaiterait que la puisse de @xmath61 soit @xmath62 . cest - - dire que lon voudrait pourvoir prendre @xmath63 . nous dmontrons tous les @xmath64 suffisamment petit nous permettent de garantir la minoration ( cf . thorme [ th : lowerbound ] ) . lobservation cruciale dans la dmonstration de ce rsultat est que les meilleures approximations dans @xmath5 sont obtenues sur certaines courbes rationnelles qui sont nodales en @xmath17 . quand on restreint ces courbes nodales , lapproximation du point @xmath17 revient lapproximation dun point _ algbrique quadratique _ , ce qui nous amne tudier plus soigneusement la distribution locale des points algbriques sur la droite projective . notons quen dimension @xmath65 , il ny a pas de sous - varits localement accumulatrices . [ th : secondtheorem ] on munit le fibr @xmath66 sur @xmath67 une hauteur de weil ( cf . ) . soit @xmath68 un nombre irrationnel algbrique . on identifie @xmath68 comme un point rationnel @xmath69 $ ] de @xmath67 . alors @xmath70 . * et @xmath68 et un nombre quadratique , alors pour toute fonction @xmath72 , @xmath73 et il existe certaines fonctions @xmath74 telles que @xmath75 en dautres termes , il nexiste pas de mesure limite pour le zoom critique . * si @xmath76 . alors pour toute @xmath72 , @xmath77 en particulier , la mesure limite est proportionnelle la mesure de lebesgue . la constante dapproximation de @xmath68 est dduite des thormes de dirichlet et roth ( ou de lingalit de liouville ) . pour les nombres quadratiques , le zoom critique est directement li aux quations de pell - fermat . trouver des points dans le zoom quivaut plus ou moins trouver des solutions _ primitives _ ( dfinition [ df : primitive ] ) de ces quations . la thorie algbrique des nombres pour les corps @xmath78 o @xmath79 est un entier naturel sans facteur carr nous donne une bonne comprhension de la structure des solution des quations @xmath80 pour @xmath81 . pour les quations de la forme @xmath82 , grce la rsolubilit de lquation @xmath83 on peut toujours localiser certaines solutions , qui suffisent pour lutilisation que nous en faisons . on remarque aussi que la constante implicite dans le premier nonc est explicitement calculable . voir les dtails et les noncs prcis dans la section [ se : theoryalgebraic ] . le deuxime nonc nous dit quil existe beaucoup dapproximants ayant la constante dapproximation proche de @xmath84 . mais il semble difficile de construire des suites de points rationnels ayant cette proprit mme pour un seul nombre cubique ( voir @xcite ) . en fait dans la dmonstration , on utilise le thorme de roth sous la forme ineffective : pour tout @xmath85 , il existe une constante @xmath86 telle que pour tout rationnel @xmath87 , on ait @xmath88 mais la constante @xmath89 nest pas explicite . en terme de lexpansion en fraction continue , on ne sait pas comment contrler la croissance des quotients partiels sauf pour les nombres quadratiques . la consquence est lineffectivit du terme derreur . la difficult majeure de comptage est que ( quand on prend une fonction caractristique dun intervalle par exemple ) les points que lon veut dnombrer sont des points entiers primitifs dans une rgion trs fine . la formule empirique ( le terme principal est le volume et le terme derreur est de grandeur de la longueur du bord ) nest plus applicable . lide que lon va adapter est la thorie dquirpartition modulo @xmath65 . nous allons dmontrer cet nonc pour des nombres rels ayant la mesure dirrationalit @xmath90 ( dfinition [ def : irrationality ] ) , et pour certains nombres quadratiques particulier avec la constante implicite prcise ( cf . la section [ se : zoomalgebraic ] ) . la dmonstration du thorme [ th : maintheorem ] utilise le paramtrage par des courbes nodales . la premire partie se dduit de celle du thorme [ th : secondtheorem ] en remarquant que dans un voisinage fix du point @xmath17 , il ny a quun nombre fini de courbes nodales qui interviennent pour le zoom critique . pour le zoom sous - critique , sur certaines courbes nodales on trouve une quidistribution au sens du deuxime nonc du thorme [ th : secondtheorem ] ( cf . proposition [ po : zoompointsoncab ] _ infra _ ) . chacune de ces courbes donne des points dordre de grandeur gale une puissance de @xmath61 . le problme est de les sommer . pour cela on utilise la technique dveloppe par r. de la bretche et t. d. browning dans @xcite , @xcite , @xcite pour traiter lordre moyen des diviseurs pour des forme binaires , qui nous entrane une formule asymptotique pour le dnombrement de points sur les courbes do nt le paramtre est petit . la mesure @xmath58 qui minore le zoom peut tre vue comme une saturation de ces courbes nodales , chacune tant quipe dune mesure uniforme . ceci est analogue lexemple de la surface del pezzo torique de degr @xmath46 tudie dans @xcite , o la mesure limite existe pour le zoom critique , qui est obtenue en utilisant le paramtrage par des droites . avec les techniques utilises dans ce texte , on nest pas capable de trouver une formule asymptotique pour le zoom sous - critique de la surface @xmath13 ( cest - - dire `` @xmath91 '' remplac par `` @xmath92 '' ) . toutefois le deuxime nonc assure que lordre de croissance de la distribution locale est minor par une puissance positive de @xmath61 avec une mesure uniforme . esquissons lorganisation du texte . dans la section [ se : approximationconstants ] on introduit la notion de constante dapproximation et lon prcise lopration de zoom . la section [ se : theoryalgebraic ] est consacre aux proprits fondamentales des corps quadratiques rels et lapplication aux quations de pell - fermat . en les utilisant , on dmontre le thorme [ th : secondtheorem ] en tudiant la distribution locale critique des nombres algbrique quadratiques dans la premire partie de la section [ se : zoomalgebraic ] , et dans la deuxime partie on dmontre la formule asymptotique pour le zoom sous - critique de certains nombres rels bas sur les thormes classiques sur lquirpartition modulo @xmath65 . ltude de la distribution locale de la surface torique @xmath13 ( tout niveau ) est faite dans la dernire section [ se : toricsurface ] , o dmontrons - nous le thorme [ th : maintheorem ] . nous rfrons le lecteur aux appendices pour une prsentation du rsultat de s. pagelot et celui de r. de la bretche et t. d. browning . * notations : * on note @xmath93 la fonction indicatrice deuler , @xmath94 le fonction arithmtique donnant le nombre total de diviseurs donne par : @xmath95 et @xmath96 la fonction de mbius . on dfinit , pour @xmath97 , @xmath98 alors on a @xmath99 pour un nombre rel @xmath100 , on note @xmath101 _ la partie entire _ de @xmath100 qui est le plus grand entier @xmath102 , et @xmath103 _ la partie fractionnaire _ de @xmath100 . fixons @xmath104 un ensemble . pour @xmath105 , on note @xmath106 le sous - ensemble de @xmath104 dfini par @xmath107 pour @xmath108 un sous - ensemble de @xmath109 , on note @xmath110 lensemble des points primitifs de @xmath108 . on dfinit plusieurs _ constantes dapproximation _ dun point rationnel sur une varit algbrique gnralisant la notion de _ mesure dirrationalit _ venant de lapproximation diophantienne classique . dans cet article , nous considrons uniquement les distances archmidiennes relles . une dfinition analogue pourrait sappliquer aux places non - archmidiennes . soit @xmath1 une varit projective dfinie sur un corps de nombres @xmath2 et quipe dune distance projective @xmath32 ( cf . un fibr en droites sur @xmath1 muni dune hauteur de weil absolue @xmath112 . on fixe un point rationnel @xmath24 . pour @xmath113 une partie constructible de @xmath1 , on considre les ensembles @xmath114 @xmath115 chacun est un intervalle : si @xmath116 , tout @xmath117 appartient @xmath118 ; de mme , si @xmath119 , tout @xmath120 appartient @xmath121 . soit @xmath5 un ouvert de @xmath1 . on dit que @xmath111 vrifie _ la proprit de northcott _ pour @xmath5 si pour tout @xmath122 , @xmath123 [ pd : appconstant ] soient @xmath24 et @xmath113 une partie constructible de @xmath1 . supposons que @xmath111 vrifie la proprit de northcott pour un ouvert de zariski non - vide @xmath5 contenant @xmath17 . alors on a @xmath124 cette quantit est appele _ constante dapproximation _ en @xmath17 dans @xmath113 , note @xmath125 sil le fibr @xmath111 est fix dans la considration . sil existe une sous - varit ferme @xmath126 contenue dans @xmath113 tel que @xmath127 , on dit que @xmath128 peut tre calcule sur @xmath126 . cette dfinition ne dpend pas du choix du choix de @xmath5 . dans la suite , lorsque lon parle de la constante dapproximation , on admet que @xmath111 vrifie la proprit de northcott pour un ouvert dense contenant @xmath17 . [ df : essential ] on dfinit _ constante essentielle _ en @xmath17 comme la quantit @xmath129 o @xmath113 parcourt tous les ouverts denses de @xmath1 . sil existe une sous - varit @xmath126 de @xmath1 de sorte que pour tout ouvert dense @xmath130 , @xmath131 , on dit que @xmath126 est _ localement accumulatrice_. ces notions ne dpendent ni du choix de la hauteur associe fibr @xmath111 , ni du choix de la distance projective . puisque le problme que lon tudiera est local et que le point que lon va approcher est dans lorbite ouverte , on peut se restreindre des ouverts de @xmath1 . dans la suite on suppose que le fibr en droites @xmath111 est gros , cest - - dire sa classe est dans lintrieur du cne pseudoeffectif de @xmath1 . alors il existe un entier @xmath132 tel que lapplication rationnelle @xmath133 est birationnelle vers son image . en particulier on peut choisir un ouvert @xmath5 tel que @xmath134 et donc @xmath135 grce au thorme de northcott . dans ce qui va suivre , on suppose toujours que @xmath111 vrifie cette proprit , ce qui est le cas pour le fibr anticanonique des varits toriques compltes lisses ( parce que le polytope associ @xmath136 est le reflt de lventail de @xmath1 contenant lorigine , cf . 3.4 p. 66 ) . en outre le fibr @xmath136 est sans lieu de base sur lorbite ouverte et donc la proprit de northcott est vrifie . toutes ces constantes sont connues en dimension @xmath65 . [ th : approximationtheorem1 ] soient @xmath137 et @xmath138 . on fixe une hauteur de weil absolue associe @xmath139 . alors @xmath140 [ rmk : thmofmckinnon ] la constante dapproximation est sensible aux singularits . prenons une courbe rationnelle @xmath89 dfinie sur @xmath2 et @xmath111 un faisceau inversible ample sur @xmath89 . on fixe @xmath141 . soit @xmath142 le morphisme de normalisation . alors @xmath143 o @xmath144 , @xmath145 est la multiplicit de la branche de @xmath89 passant par @xmath17 correspondant @xmath146 et @xmath147 ici @xmath148 veut dire que @xmath149 , qui arrive par exemple pour @xmath150 et @xmath17 un point imaginaire @xmath151 et donc il est impossible dtre approch par des nombres rationnels . nous ne considrons pas ce cas dans ce texte . cest un fait empirique que les approximants proviennent essentiellement des courbes rationnelles . en effet d. mckinnon a propos la conjecture suivante ( * ? ? ? * conjecture 2.7 ) : [ conj : mckinnon ] soient @xmath111 un fibr ample sur @xmath1 avec une hauteur de weil choisie et @xmath152 . supposons quil y a une courbe rationnelle passant par @xmath17 ( ceci implique en particulier que @xmath153 . alors il existe une courbe rationnelle @xmath89 telle que @xmath154 cette conjecture prdit que @xmath10 peut tre calcule sur des courbes rationnelles passant par @xmath17 , qui est accord avec notre cas . on utilise souvent la procdure suivante pour dterminer la constante essentielle . elle consiste essentiellement en deux tapes : dmontrer une borne infrieure uniforme valide dans un ouvert pour le produit dune certaine puissance de la distance avec la hauteur et trouver une famille de courbes rationnelles do nt la runion dans la varit est dense pour la topologie de zariski et chacune atteint la constante dapproximation souhaite . il convient de remarquer que cette procdure donne seulement une condition suffisante pour trouver @xmath155 . en gnral il nest pas clair que @xmath155 puisse toujours tre atteinte sur une famille de courbes rationnelles . maintenant nous allons dcrire lopration de zoom en dtail . on identifie localement @xmath156 avec lespace tangent @xmath26 en envoyant @xmath17 sur lorigine , en utilisant un systme de coordonnes analytiques . dans @xmath26 , on dfinit une contraction par une homothtie de rapport une puissance de @xmath61 ( la lettre @xmath61 dsigne ici la borne de la hauteur ) . plus prcisment , si lon note le diffomorphisme entre @xmath156 et @xmath26 par @xmath25 , alors _ loprateur de zoom _ @xmath157 avec _ le facteur _ @xmath30 est dfini par @xmath158 fixons @xmath5 une sous - varit de @xmath1 . rappelons la notation @xmath47 ( notation [ notationcqbx ] ) . soit @xmath56 , on introduit la mesure @xmath159 dfinie par @xmath160 cette dfinition dpend de la diffrentielle en lorigine du diffomorphisme choisi . existe @xmath161 tels que soit vrifie pour une infinit de @xmath61 . on peut donner , laide de la conjecture de batyrev - manin et celle de peyre sur lquidistribution des points rationnels , une prdiction nave de cet ordre de grandeur . soit @xmath162 . quand on calcul @xmath163 , on est en train de compter des points rationnels dans la boule @xmath164 do nt le volume est de grandeur @xmath165 . supposons la validit de la conjecture de batyrev - manin pour louvert @xmath5 , cest - - dire ( on note @xmath166 ) @xmath167 et la validit dune forme forte de lquidistribution , cest - - dire pour des voisinages analytiques do nt la taille dpendent de @xmath61 , alors on devrait avoir dans , @xmath168 autrement dit on devrait avoir @xmath169 en fait , dans tous les ( rares ) exemples connus , la valeur de @xmath8 est accord avec cette prdiction , mais celle de @xmath170 ne lest pas . il arrive parfois que @xmath171 , comme pour la varit considre dans ce texte . le comportement de la suite dcrit la _ distribution locale _ autour du point @xmath17 sur @xmath1 . on appelle _ mesure limite _ comme la limite de la suite ( si elle existe ) . prenant du recul , une minoration du type @xmath172 pour une mesure @xmath173 dfinie sur @xmath26 veut dire que la distribution locale est uniformment minore par une mesure , ce qui assure lexistence de beaucoup de points dans le zoom . cest ce que nous allons dmontrer pour certains zooms de la surface @xmath13 . inspir par le fait que certaines courbes rationnelles contiennent beaucoup plus de points que les autres dans une mme varit dans lopration de zoom , bien quelles aient la mme constante dapproximation , nous proposons la dfinition suivante pour les distinguer . [ df : weaklocal ] supposons que @xmath174 . on dit quune sous - varit ferme stricte @xmath175 de @xmath1 est _ localement faiblement accumulatrice _ si @xmath176 et pour tout @xmath35 suffisamment grand , pour tout ouvert @xmath5 dense pour la topologie de zariski satisfaisant @xmath177 et @xmath178 dense dans @xmath175 , @xmath179 autrement dit , les sous - varits localement faiblement accumulatrices ne sont pas localement accumulatrices mais dominent leur complment dans le zoom critique . le zoom dun certain facteur va mettre en vidence les sous - varits do nt la constante dapproximation atteignent ce facteur et ignorer ceux do nt la constante dapproximation est plus grande . donc le zoom dun facteur plus petit que @xmath155 va nous ramener des sous - varits fermes localement accumulatrices . cela plus la proposition suivante explique la raison pour laquelle on sintresse au zoom avec le facteur @xmath180 . [ po : weakzoom ] soit @xmath5 une partie analytique de @xmath1 pour laquelle @xmath111 vrifie la proprit de northcott telle que @xmath177 . alors pour tout @xmath181 et @xmath56 , on a 1 . @xmath182 si @xmath183 ; 2 . @xmath184 sinon , pour @xmath185 . on peut supposer que @xmath60 est une fonction caractristique @xmath36 pour @xmath35 . on choisit une distance @xmath32 sur @xmath26 . daprs la proposition - dfinition [ pd : appconstant ] , pour @xmath186 tel que @xmath187 , il existe une @xmath188 telle que pour tout @xmath189 diffrent de @xmath17 , @xmath190 . supposons que @xmath191 . cela implique que @xmath192 les points aprs zoom doivent situer dans le support de @xmath60 , donc @xmath193 do @xmath194 donc un tel @xmath146 nexiste pas quand @xmath195 . [ def : criticalzoom ] on dit que le zoom est _ critique _ ( resp . _ sous - critique _ ) si son facteur @xmath43 ( resp . @xmath196 ) . dans cet article on sintresse aux varits toriques lisses et projectives do nt le fibr en droites anticanonique est engendr pas ses sections globales et on utilise une hauteur de weil associe . les travaux @xcite @xcite @xcite confirment la conjecture de manin pour les varits toriques munies dune hauteur de weil associe au fibr anticanonique . ceci est en faveur de la prdiction prcdente sur lordre de grandeur ( au mois pour @xmath8 ) . on rappelle des faits classiques sur les corps quadratiques rels . pour les dtails , voir par exemple ( @xcite 2.5 , 4.6 , 5.4 ) . on fixe un entier @xmath197 sans facteur carr . soit @xmath198 . on note @xmath199 lunit fondamentale de @xmath200 telle que @xmath201 . alors le groupe dunits @xmath202 . on introduit les sous - groupes de @xmath203 : @xmath204 @xmath205 on note @xmath206 ( resp . @xmath207 ) llment de @xmath208 ( resp . @xmath209 ) do nt la classe engendre le groupe @xmath210 ( resp . @xmath211 ) . [ le : samuel ] @xmath212 pour @xmath81 , on dsigne par @xmath213 lensemble des solutions entires de lquation pell - fermat @xmath214 @xmath215 on note aussi @xmath216 la notation @xmath217 signifie ici que @xmath218 est un idal de lanneau @xmath219 . on utilise @xmath220 pour dsigner la norme des idaux et @xmath221 pour dsigner la norme des lments . on dfinit @xmath222 on note in ( resp . de , ra ) lensemble des nombres premiers qui sont inertes ( resp . sont dcomposs , se ramifient ) dans lextension @xmath223 . pour tout @xmath224 , sa conjugaison est dfinie par @xmath225 on a besoin dune estimation explicite du cardinal de lensemble @xmath226 ainsi que celui de @xmath227 . on fixe @xmath81 . soient les entiers @xmath228 dfinis par la factorisation @xmath229 o @xmath94 dsigne la fonction arithmtique de nombre du diviseur ( cf . ) . on observe que lensemble @xmath226 est parfois vide . [ co : upperboundforimm ] @xmath230 quelque soit @xmath231 , on considre sa dcomposition @xmath232 alors comme lapplication @xmath220 est multiplicative , @xmath233 la quantit droite est en fait la factorisation de @xmath132 ( [ factorisationofm ] ) . on en conclut que @xmath234 en particulier @xmath235 est pair pour @xmath236 . rciproquement , pour tout @xmath236 , on choisit @xmath237 pair et pour tout @xmath238 , donnons - nous un couple @xmath239 tel que @xmath240 . le produit @xmath241 est un idal de norme @xmath242 . pour chaque @xmath238 , il y a @xmath243 tels couples dentiers . do lnonc . le groupe @xmath208 agit sur @xmath244 librement et lensemble des orbites est en bijection avec @xmath245 [ co : structuretheorem1 ] le groupe @xmath209 agit sur lensemble @xmath213 librement et on a la majoration suivante pour le cardinal de lensemble des orbites : @xmath246 daprs le lemme [ le : samuel ] on a @xmath247\leqslant 3 $ ] . le cardinal des orbites de laction de @xmath209 sur @xmath213 , qui est aussi libre , est major par @xmath248 la conclusion dcoule du corollaire [ co : upperboundforimm ] . [ df : primitive ] une solution @xmath249 de lquation est dite _ primitive _ si @xmath250 . toute solution de vrifie @xmath251 . donc lorsque @xmath252 , toutes les solutions sont automatiquement primitives . un avantage de la dcomposition de @xmath213 par laction de @xmath209 est le suivant . [ le : pgcddonotchange ] supposons que @xmath253 . alors @xmath254 ne dpend pas des lments @xmath255 qui sont dans une mme orbite . soient @xmath256 tels que @xmath257 . alors @xmath258 comme idaux . donc pour tout nombre premier @xmath259 , on a @xmath260 on appelle _ famille de solutions _ de lensemble des solutions correspondant une orbite de laction de @xmath261 dans @xmath262 . sil existe une solution @xmath263 qui est primitive , alors lorbite par laction de @xmath209 donne une famille de solutions primitives . si la solution nest pas primitive , on note @xmath264 et on a @xmath265 . alors @xmath266 est une famille de solutions _ primitives _ de lquation @xmath267 do nt le coefficient est plus petit . donc en lidentifiant avec une famille de solutions primitives dans @xmath268 , on peut dfinir @xmath269 comme lensemble des familles des solutions primitives des quations pour toutes les valeurs de @xmath132 . alors @xmath270 puisque tout couple @xmath271 engendre une famille de solutions primitives de pour @xmath132 arbitrairement grand . cela est suffisant pour lutilisation ultrieure , et lon na pas besoin de dcrire pour quels @xmath132 , on a @xmath272 . maintenant on considre les quations diophantiennes @xmath273 dabord on dmontre que les solutions de sont contenues dans celles des quations de type @xmath80 , do nt la structure est connue daprs la discussion prcdente . deuximement on dmontre que quand @xmath274 , lensemble des solutions de lquation ( modulo @xmath275 ) est engendr par une puissance de lunit fondamentale @xmath276 . cela nous permet de construire une suite de solutions primitives de partir de nimporte quelle solution primitive de pour @xmath277 fix . on factorise @xmath278 avec @xmath279 sans facteur carr . ce qui nous ramne aux quations considres prcdemment est lobservation simple suivante . [ le : passtogeneralequations ] on note @xmath280 lensemble des solutions @xmath281 de . alors @xmath282 . plus prcisment , on a @xmath283 @xmath284 maintenant comme toute solution @xmath281 de lquation @xmath285 vrifie @xmath286 , en crivant @xmath287 et en utilisant les notations , on obtient lquivalence suivante @xmath288 notons quici @xmath289 est un entier sans facteur carr . ainsi chercher des solutions de revient rsoudre une quation de pell sous certaine condition de divisibilit , do nt la rsolubilit est assure grce un thorme de dirichlet . on donne une preuve courte pour faciliter la lecture . soit @xmath79 en entier positif qui nest pas un carr . on note @xmath290 alors lensemble des solutions @xmath291 de lquation @xmath292 est un sous - groupe de @xmath293 vrifiant que @xmath294 est cyclique engendr par la classe dune puissance de lunit fondamentale @xmath295 du corps @xmath296 . lensemble @xmath297 est un sous - groupe ( multiplicatif ) de @xmath293 . puisque @xmath291 est le noyau du morphisme @xmath298 dans le diagramme commutatif suivant , @xmath299 \ar[r ] & \mathcal{b}_d^*=\{z\in{\mathbb{z}}+{\mathbb{z}}\sqrt{d}:n_{{\mathbb{q}}(\sqrt{d})/{\mathbb{q}}}(z)=1\ } \ar@{^{(}->}[d]^j \ar[rd]^-{i\circ j } \\ \ker ( i)\ar@{^{(}->}[r]&({\mathbb{z}}+{\mathbb{z}}\sqrt{d})^ * \ar[r]^-i & ( { \mathbb{z}}+{\mathbb{z}}\sqrt{d}/(s))^ * , } \ ] ] qui part de lensemble @xmath300 de cardinal infini vers limage @xmath301 de cardinal fini . donc le noyau @xmath291 doit tre un ensemble infini ( mme cyclique ) . [ po : pgcddonotchange ] le groupe @xmath302 agit sur lensemble des solutions de de la manire suivante . pour @xmath303 , et @xmath249 une solution de , on note @xmath304 alors @xmath305 dfini par @xmath306 est une solutions de . de plus , @xmath307 . on vrifie que @xmath308 soit @xmath309 , alors @xmath310 do @xmath311 on a videmment @xmath312 puisque ( comme dans la dmonstration du lemme [ le : pgcddonotchange ] ) @xmath313 on en dduit que @xmath314 do lnonc . [ rmk : inftysol ] soient @xmath315 qui engendrent le groupe @xmath316 . on fixe @xmath317 une solution de et soient @xmath318 dfinis comme prcdemment . comme @xmath319 , on en conclut que les nombres rationnels @xmath320 forment une suite dapproximants de @xmath321 . comme lon a vu prcdemment , @xmath322 puisque tout couple de types @xmath323 ou @xmath324 appartiennent cet ensemble . ainsi on peut construire une infinit de suites de solutions primitives laide de la procdure ci - dessus . si @xmath281 est primitif , on obtient alors une suite dapproximants _ primitifs_. dans cette section on tudie la distribution locale dun point @xmath325 . on identifie localement @xmath67 avec @xmath326 via lapplication dfinie pour @xmath327 , @xmath328\longmapsto \frac{u}{v}\quad ( [ \theta:1]\longmapsto \theta).\ ] ] on utilise la hauteur de weil canonique associe @xmath66 : @xmath329)=\max(|u|,|v| ) , \quad(u , v)\in{\mathbb{z}}^2,\quad \operatorname{\operatorname{pgcd}}(u , v)=1.\ ] ] on utilise la valeur absolue comme la distance . il convient de choisir , pour tout @xmath330 , les fonction caractristiques @xmath36 et @xmath331 dfinies par @xmath332 pour tester la rpartition asymptotique des rationnels autour du point @xmath68 . on remarque que @xmath331 est en fait la fonction caractristique de la runion des intervalles @xmath333\theta+\eta,\theta+\varepsilon\mathclose],\quad \mathopen[\theta-\varepsilon,\theta-\eta\mathclose[.\ ] ] ( mme pour @xmath36 . ) on fixe dans la suite @xmath334 et lon considre la suite de mesures @xmath335 . on voit que @xmath336 vaut le nombre de point @xmath337\in{\mathbb{p}}^1({\mathbb{q}})$ ] qui vrifient les conditions suivantes @xmath338 @xmath339 si @xmath340=2 $ ] , i.e. @xmath68 est quadratique , un tel nombre est en gnral reprsent de faon unique sous la forme @xmath341 en vertu de , il suffit de considrer les nombres de la forme @xmath342 avec @xmath343 . daprs les thormes de roth et dirichlet , on a @xmath344 . donc on prend @xmath71 correspondant au zoom critique . on rcrit linquation comme @xmath345 on a aussi lingalit de liouville @xmath346 o la constante @xmath347 est calculable ( cf . la dmonstration de la proposition [ po : effectiveliouville ] ) . le rsultat principal de cette partie est le suivant , qui dmontre la partie @xmath71 du thorme [ th : secondtheorem ] . [ th : criticzoomforquadratics ] pour @xmath348 , il existe @xmath349 , @xmath350 tels que @xmath351 par consquent , il nexiste pas de mesure limite pour le zoom critique . ce thorme est une consquence des propositions [ po : controlofepsilon ] , [ po : avoidance ] et [ po : trackpoints ] . dans @xcite s. lang a considr aussi le dnombrement dapproximants de nombres quadratiques mais sans lopration de zoom ( cest - - dire seulement la condition de borne de la hauteur est impos ) . il a obtenu une formule asymptotique du type @xmath352 , ce qui est une consquence directe des conclusions sur la structure des solutions des quation de pell - fermat . nous trouvons dabord le lien avec des quations de pell - fermat . les quations et nous donnent @xmath353 on en conclut que @xmath354 ne prend quun nombre fini de valeurs entires et ce nombre est indpendant de @xmath61 . cela nous permet de dcomposer la quantit @xmath355 de la faon suivante @xmath356 o @xmath357 de plus , on a , daprs , @xmath358 do @xmath359 . cest - - dire quand le diamtre du voisinage auquel la fonction caractristique correspond est suffisamment petit , il ny a pas de points rationnels pour tout @xmath61 . on ne cherche pas trouver la valeur maximale possible de @xmath360 puisque lintrt de cette ingalit est quil rvle , comme dans le cas de la distribution locale dun point rationnel , un phnomne de trou . voir a.1 pour un analogue du cas o @xmath68 est un nombre rationnel . on suppose comme prcdemment que @xmath342 . le but de cette section est double . sappuyant sur les rsultats de la section [ pell - fermatsimple ] , on donne une borne effective pour et on construit des suites de bornes telles que @xmath361 pour toute fonction caractristique @xmath331 suffisamment petite . on conserve les notations dans . [ po : controlofepsilon ] pour tout @xmath362 ( cf . ) , on a , pour tout @xmath363 , @xmath364 o @xmath279 sont dfinis par . [ po : avoidance ] il existe une fonction dtape @xmath365 qui est dcroissante et continue infrieurement telle que pour tout @xmath35 et tout @xmath55\frac{\varepsilon}{g(\varepsilon)},\varepsilon\mathclose[$ ] , on puisse choisir une suite de bornes @xmath366 qui tend vers @xmath367 de manire que @xmath368 le lemme [ le : passtogeneralequations ] nous permet de se ramener aux cas o @xmath369 o @xmath370 est sans facteur carr . plus prcisment , pour @xmath330 et pour chaque entier @xmath132 , on note @xmath371 et @xmath372 lensemble des points @xmath373 vrifiant les conditions @xmath374 @xmath375 il suffit de dmontrer quil existe @xmath366 telle que @xmath376 puisque @xmath377 on est ramen un problme concernant des solutions des quations de pell - fermat . on extrait un encadrement pour @xmath378 . dune part , @xmath379 do @xmath380 dautre part , @xmath381 do @xmath382 en rsum , on a @xmath383 en reportant dans , on a @xmath384 donc @xmath385 de la mme manire @xmath386 il en rsulte que @xmath387 daprs , on a que pour @xmath388 , @xmath389 donc entrane une borne pour le nombre de solutions dans toute famille de solutions de lquation @xmath390 lapplication @xmath391 est dfinie par @xmath392 limage dune famille de solutions @xmath393 @xmath394 est un rseau do nt la priode est @xmath395 dans @xmath396 . prenons une famille de solutions @xmath397 , on a ( compte - tenu du signe ) pour @xmath398 , @xmath399 la proposition [ co : structuretheorem1 ] donne une majoration du nombre dorbites , on arrive la borne dans la proposition [ po : controlofepsilon ] . donc pour tout @xmath400 fix , lensemble des images de toutes les solutions de ( [ eq : familyofpellequation ] ) , not @xmath401 , est une runion finie de rseaux de mme priode dans @xmath396 par lapplication @xmath391 . donc la fonction @xmath402 dfinie par @xmath403 est videmment dcroissante et continue infrieurement . elle est constante sur tout intervalle @xmath404 si lon prend @xmath405 assez proches tels que @xmath406 savoir @xmath407 on peut choisir @xmath408 de sorte quil existe une constant @xmath409 tel que lintervalle @xmath410\ ] ] vrifie @xmath411 daprs ( [ boundforloguv1 ] ) , ceci dmontre que @xmath412 pour tout @xmath413 . la fonction @xmath414 vrifie les mme proprits que celles de @xmath108 , do la proposition [ po : avoidance ] . en imitant cette mthode , quand la fonction caractristique choisie permet davoir une solution dune quation pell - fermat gnralise , on peut choisir la suite @xmath366 de la faon quelle donne au moins une famille de solutions . [ po : trackpoints ] soit @xmath415 avec @xmath343 . pour tout couple @xmath416 , @xmath330 , tel que lintervalle @xmath4172\sqrt{ab}\theta^{-2}\eta,2\sqrt{ab}\theta^{-2}\varepsilon\mathclose[$ ] contienne la valeur absolue dun entier @xmath132 de sorte que @xmath418 contienne une solution primitive ( cf . les notations du lemme ) . alors il existe une suite de bornes @xmath408 tel que @xmath419 on choisit @xmath4200,1\mathclose[$ ] tel que @xmath421 2\sqrt{ab}\theta^{-2}\eta,2\sqrt{ab}\theta^{-2}\varepsilon \lambda^2\mathclose[$ ] . on suppose dans la suite que @xmath422 , la dmonstration tant analogue lorsque @xmath423 . soit @xmath122 tel que @xmath424 on dfinit lensemble @xmath425 des @xmath426 primitifs vrifiant @xmath427 pour @xmath428 , on a , daprs , @xmath429 en revanche , grce la deuxime ingalit de , @xmath430 on note @xmath431 . alors la positivit de @xmath132 implique celle de @xmath1 . notons que @xmath432 , on obtient , daprs lhypothse sur @xmath132 , @xmath433 cela entrane aussi la majoration @xmath434 ainsi que la minoration pour @xmath1 : @xmath435 par la premire ingalit de . cela montre que @xmath436 on prend @xmath437 une solution primitive de lquation @xmath438 on dfinit @xmath439 comme dans la remarque . comme @xmath440 , on peut choisir @xmath408 de la manire que @xmath441 donc pour tout @xmath400 suffisamment grand , on a @xmath442 , do @xmath443 pour @xmath348 fixs , on peut choisir @xmath444 tel que @xmath445 et que @xmath418 contienne une solution primitive ( remarque [ rmk : inftysol ] ) . rappelons les proprits des fonctions @xmath108 et @xmath414 dans la dmonstration de la proposition [ po : avoidance ] . il existe alors @xmath446 tel que @xmath447 on dfinit @xmath448 maintenant on prend @xmath449\frac{m\theta^2}{2\sqrt{ab}}-\frac{\delta_1}{2|\varepsilon_d^*|^2},\frac{m\theta^2}{2\sqrt{ab}}\right[.\ ] ] puisque @xmath450 le couple @xmath416 vrifie toutes les hypothses des propositions [ po : avoidance ] , [ po : trackpoints ] . comte - tenu de la majoration fournie par la proposition [ po : controlofepsilon ] , il en dcoule donc que @xmath451 on va prouver un rsultat sur la distribution locale en un point rel vrifiant des ingalits de type analogue celle de liouville , qui _ a fortiori _ sapplique aux nombres algbriques . pour cela on rappelle des notions standard dapproximation diophantienne des nombres rels . [ def : irrationality ] soit @xmath452 . on dit quun nombre rel @xmath68 a _ un ordre dirrationalit _ @xmath453 sil existe une constante @xmath454 telle que @xmath455 _ la mesure dirrationalit _ @xmath456 est la borne infrieure de lensemble des ordres dirrationalit de @xmath68 . de manire quivalente , elle est gale au maximum des nombres @xmath457 tels que @xmath458 si @xmath68 est algbrique , @xmath456 est rien dautre que la constante dapproximation @xmath459 associe au fibr @xmath66 . le nombre @xmath90 est un ordre dirrationalit et la mesure dirrationalit dun nombre quadratique . pour tout @xmath35 , le nombre @xmath460 est un ordre dirrationalit dun nombre algbrique de degr @xmath461 do nt la mesure dirrationalit est @xmath90 . le rsultat principal de cette section est le suivant , qui est valide pour tout nombre algbrique de degr @xmath462 . pour ceux do nt le degr est @xmath90 , on a une meilleur contrle du terme derreur . [ th : localdistributionofrealnumbers ] soient @xmath463 un nombre rel et @xmath76 . alors pour tout @xmath464 et @xmath465 , * si @xmath466 , supposons que @xmath467 , on a @xmath468 si de plus @xmath90 est un ordre dirrationalit de @xmath463 , savoir @xmath4690,1\mathclose[$ ] tel que pour tout nombre rationnel @xmath470 on ait @xmath471 on a , en notant @xmath472 @xmath473 * si @xmath474 , on a @xmath475 la dpendance du terme derreur dans sur @xmath463 et @xmath94 est intrinsque au sens similaire au thorme de roth . en effet , elle dpende de les constante @xmath476 dans avec @xmath453 proche de @xmath90 ( cf . aussi _ infra _ ) . alors que le terme derreur dans ne dpende que de la taille de @xmath463 . tout dabord on reformule ce problme de zoom en un problme de dnombrement . pour @xmath477 , on dfinit @xmath478 lensemble des point @xmath337 $ ] vrifiant @xmath479 graphiquement , si lon prend @xmath480 , cest - - dire on prend la fonction de test @xmath36 et on calcule @xmath481 , on compte des points entiers primitifs lintrieur du triangle do nt laire est dordre de grandeur @xmath482 et celle de la longueur du bord est @xmath61 . donc la comparaison classique avec laire du triangle nest utilisable que pour les cas o @xmath474 . ceux o @xmath483 ncessitent un travail supplmentaire . notre approche sappuie sur la thorie dquirpartition modulo @xmath65 utilise dans @xcite . [ de : discrpance ] soit @xmath484 une suite de nombres rels . elle est dite _ quirpartie modulo @xmath65 _ si pour tout @xmath485 , on a @xmath486 soit @xmath487 une suite de nombres rels quirpartie modulo @xmath65 . soit @xmath488 . ( @xmath489 ) @xmath490 de cette suite est dfinie par @xmath491}\left|\frac{\sharp\{n\leqslant n:\{x_n\}\in\mathopen[0,\lambda\mathclose]\}}{n}-\lambda\right|.\ ] ] si la suite @xmath492 pour un nombre @xmath463 rel fix , on notera @xmath493 . on rappelle lingalit de koksma - denjoy pour les suites quirparties modulo @xmath65 . ( voir , par exemple , @xcite p. 143 ) [ th : koksma - denjoy ] soient @xmath487 une suite quirpartie modulo @xmath65 et @xmath494 . soit @xmath495 une fonction mesurable variation borne dfinie sur @xmath496 $ ] ( on note @xmath497 la variation totale de @xmath495 ) . alors @xmath498 lingalit de erds - turn donne un contrle de la discrpance ( cf . @xcite p. 122 - 123 ) pour les nombres irrationnels do nt la mesure dirrationalit est finie . [ co : controlforthediscrepancy ] soit @xmath68 un nombre irrationnel ayant un ordre dirrationalit @xmath452 . alors pour tout @xmath499 , on a @xmath500 si les quotients partiels dans lexpansion en fraction continue dun nombre irrationnel sont born , de manire quivalent , lingalit de liouville tant vrifie , alors une meilleure majoration de la discrpance existe ( cf . * theorem 3.4 ) , p. 125 ) . soient @xmath501 $ ] un nombre irrationnel . supposons que les quotients partiels de @xmath502 sont borns , i.e. il existe @xmath503 tel que @xmath504 . alors @xmath505 o @xmath506 . [ le : boundforboundquotients ] soit @xmath502 un nombre irrationnel . existe @xmath5070,1\mathclose[$ ] tel que pour tout nombre rationnel @xmath470 , on ait @xmath508 soit @xmath501 $ ] son expansion en fraction continue . alors pour tout @xmath509 , @xmath510 par consquent,@xmath511 soient @xmath512 les convergents principaux de @xmath502 . alors ils vrifient , pour tout @xmath513 , la rgle de rcurrence ( voir ( * ? ? ? * theorem 1 ) ) @xmath514 @xmath515 et ( voir ( * ? ? ? * theorem 9 ) ) pour tout @xmath516 , @xmath517 il en dcoule que @xmath518 et donc @xmath519 en reportant dans , on obtient que pour @xmath516 , @xmath520 on peut supposer que @xmath521 . on fixe @xmath522 . + * cas @xmath523 . * on suppose que @xmath524 . la premire tape est de comparer le cardinal de @xmath478 avec celui de @xmath525 qui consiste en les @xmath526 de sorte que @xmath527 on prend @xmath528 . alors implique que @xmath529 donc pour un tel @xmath378 choisi , il ny a quun nombre fini de choix pour @xmath530 . de plus on a @xmath531 on en conclut que @xmath532 rciproquement , si lon prend @xmath533 , implique que @xmath534 on en conclut de faon analogue que @xmath535 et ainsi que @xmath536 on est ramen calculer le cardinal de lensemble @xmath525 . laide de linversion de mbius , on dfinit pour @xmath138 , @xmath537 o @xmath538 consiste en les @xmath526 tels que @xmath539 et @xmath538 consiste en les @xmath526 tels que @xmath540 on obtient une borne sur @xmath32 de la faon suivante . dune part , @xmath541 daprs lhypothse sur @xmath463 , pour tout @xmath85 , il existe une constante @xmath542 telle que pour tout @xmath543 , @xmath544 donc @xmath545 en combinant les deux ingalits on obtient @xmath546 donc on peut restreindre la somme en @xmath32 ceux vrifiant @xmath547 si de plus est valide , alors @xmath548 dans ce cas en combinant on obtient @xmath549 on tablit maintenant les formules asymptotiques suivantes un peu plus gnrales faisant intervenir une constante fixe @xmath550 , qui permet de lappliquer une hauteur quivalente celle donne . pour une utilisation ultrieure , on prcise la dpendance en @xmath550 du terme derreur . [ po : smallepsilon ] fixons @xmath551 et @xmath552 . supposons que @xmath553 on dfinit lensemble @xmath554 des @xmath526 satisfaisant @xmath555 ainsi que @xmath556 alors pour tout @xmath499 et pour tout @xmath557 , @xmath558 si de plus est vrifie , on a @xmath559 les formules ci - dessus restent valides si lon remplace par @xmath560 soit @xmath561 fix dans la suite . on peut supposer que @xmath489 est un entier ( quitte rajouter des constantes absolues dans les termes derreur ) . on considre le dcoupage de lintervalle @xmath5620,\frac{k}{\alpha d}b \mathclose ] $ ] en les intervalles @xmath563\frac{(k-1)kb}{\alpha d n},\frac{kkb}{\alpha d n}\right],\quad ( 1\leqslant k\leqslant n).\ ] ] soit @xmath564 tel que @xmath565 on a @xmath566 et donc @xmath567 daprs la condition et le choix de @xmath489 , @xmath568 on en conclut que pour tout @xmath569 et pour tout entier @xmath378 fix , il existe au plus un entier @xmath530 tel que @xmath570 sont uniques . fixons dans la suite @xmath2 et considrons lintervalle @xmath571 on cherche maintenant une quivalence de lhypothse suivante : * ( h ) * pour @xmath572 fix , il existe un ( unique ) @xmath573 tel que @xmath574\frac{\eta ( k-1)k}{\alpha d n}b^{1-\frac{1}{r}},\frac{\varepsilon k k}{\alpha d n}b^{1-\frac{1}{r}}\right [ $ ] . la difficult de la dmonstration qui suit vient du cas @xmath575 , pour lequel lintervalle @xmath576 peut contenir un entier , y compris pour des grandes valeurs de @xmath61 . on a les deux possibilit suivante : + * cas i * : lintervalle @xmath576 contient un entier @xmath577 . alors on a @xmath578 alors * ( h ) * revient dire que @xmath579 @xmath580 rciproquement , si @xmath378 vrifie lune des conditions ci - dessus , lentier @xmath530 tel que * ( h ) * soit vrifie existe et vaut @xmath581 ou @xmath582 selon lappartenance de @xmath583 . notons que @xmath584 . en dsignant @xmath5850,1\mathclose[$ ] , qui est soit un intervalle ( si lun des @xmath586 est vide ) , soit la runion disjointe de deux intervalles , on conclut que la condition * ( h ) * est quivalente @xmath587 . + * cas ii * : lintervalle @xmath576 ne contient aucun entier . suppose que @xmath588u_{k}-1,u_k\mathclose[$ ] o @xmath589 . alors dans ce cas * ( h ) * est quivalente @xmath5900,1\mathclose[.\ ] ] on vrifie que lon a une quivalence analogue si lon suppose . ayant tabli cette quivalence , on peut rduire le comptage en deux variables @xmath591 en une seule @xmath378 . par labuse de notation , pour une proprit @xmath592 , on note @xmath593 la fonction qui vaut @xmath65 si @xmath592 est vrifie et vaut @xmath594 sinon . nous avons la dcomposition suivante @xmath595 o le terme derreur @xmath596 on traite dabord le terme principal en appliquant les thormes [ co : controlforthediscrepancy ] et [ th : koksma - denjoy ] . on dfinit la fonction @xmath597\to\mathbb{r}$ ] comme @xmath598 on dcompose @xmath599 comme @xmath600 daprs le thorme [ th : koksma - denjoy ] et le thorme [ co : controlforthediscrepancy ] ( avec @xmath601 ) , @xmath602 o la constante implicite dpend de @xmath603 et @xmath463 . de faon similaire on obtient @xmath604 donc @xmath605 on somme sur tous les @xmath2 . faisons - le dabord pour le terme principal de @xmath599 : @xmath606 ensuite pour le terme derreur de @xmath607 : @xmath608 on obtient @xmath609 o la constante implicite dpend de @xmath603 et @xmath463 . ensuite on estime le terme @xmath610 en utilisant la mme mthode . en imitant la discussion pour @xmath599 , on en conclut de lexistence des ensembles @xmath611 qui sont la runion de au plus @xmath90 intervalles disjoints de @xmath612 et @xmath613 tels que @xmath614 \longleftrightarrow \{\alpha v\}\in l_{1,k}\end{aligned}\ ] ] @xmath615 \longleftrightarrow \{\alpha v\}\in l_{2,k}\end{aligned}\ ] ] on dcompose @xmath616 comme @xmath617 on estime les @xmath618 en appliquant une autre fois les thormes [ th : koksma - denjoy ] et [ co : controlforthediscrepancy ] . @xmath619 donc @xmath620 on obtient aussi une formule analogue pour @xmath621 . ainsi @xmath622 en rsum de et , on a dmontr que pour @xmath463 gnral ayant la mesure dirrationalit @xmath90 , @xmath623 maintenant , supposons la validit de lingalit . il suffit de modifier tous les termes derreur concernant la discrpance , savoir , les termes qui contiennent @xmath603 . plus prcisment , en utilisant le lemme [ le : boundforboundquotients ] , on a @xmath624 et donc , @xmath625 _ suite de la dmonstration du thorme [ th : localdistributionofrealnumbers]_. on dcompose @xmath538 en des parties @xmath626 o @xmath627 avec @xmath628 choisies de sorte que @xmath629 en appliquant la proposition [ po : smallepsilon ] ces ensembles ( avec @xmath630 ) on dduit que pour tout @xmath499 et @xmath631 , @xmath632 ce qui est valide aussi pour @xmath633 . il reste sommer sur tous les @xmath32 . que lon a pour tout @xmath85 , @xmath634 on choisit @xmath635 on vrifie que avec ce choix @xmath636 et donc @xmath637 pour @xmath638 . on rcrit comme @xmath639 en utilisant lestimation lmentaire @xmath640 la somme du terme principal de est gale @xmath641 et celle du terme derreur est dordre de grandeur gal @xmath642 finalement en reportant dans on en conclut que @xmath643 il ne reste qu prendre , pour @xmath465 donn , @xmath499 tel que @xmath644 . en reportant dans , cela dmontre finalement que @xmath645 maintenant , supposons la validit de . rappelons la borne pour @xmath32 . dans ce cas on prend @xmath646 comme lon suppose que @xmath647 , on dduit de @xmath648 on somme sur tous les @xmath32 dans le terme principal et le terme derreur respectivement . @xmath650 on en conclut que @xmath651 cela dmontre la formule . + si @xmath652 , alors il suffit de modifier la dfinition de lensemble @xmath525 en remplaant @xmath653 par @xmath654 . + * cas @xmath474 . * une inversion de mbius nous fournit que @xmath655 o @xmath656 on a , par la mthode de comparaison classique avec laire du domaine rel , @xmath657 puis on somme sur tous les @xmath32 possible et lon obtient @xmath658 les rsultats sur lapproximation dun nombre rel quon a dmontrs prcdemment peuvent tre vu comme le fait dapprocher une droite par des points primitifs de pente donne . pour une utilisation ultrieure , nous allons prsenter une version plus gnrales du thorme [ th : localdistributionofrealnumbers ] . cest - - dire , on compte des points primitifs sur un rseau proche dune droite do nt la pente est un nombre quadratique donn . le but est dessayer de prciser la dpendance des constantes implicites , qui fait intervenir le dterminant du rseau . lide est qu laide dune transformation linaire lie au rseau , lapproximation sur le rseau de la droite quivaut lapproximation sur @xmath109 dune autre droite de pente gale un autre nombre quadratique . comme lon a vu , lun des inconvnients de la dmonstration ci - dessus est que la constante @xmath659 qui apparat dans est en gnral difficile prciser , cause de labsence deffectivit du thorme de roth ( ou bien de lingalit de liouville ) . cela mne aussi une ineffectivit de la discrpance , car dans la dmonstration du corollaire [ co : controlforthediscrepancy ] , on a utilis le thorme de roth ( voir @xcite , p 123 ) . pour les nombres quadratiques , cette difficult disparat parce que lon peut prciser facilement les constantes dans lingalit de liouville et dans la majoration de la discrpance . on remarque que la technique ci - dessous fonctionne aussi pour les rels do nt les quotients partiels dans lexpansion en fraction continue sont borns ( ceux qui vrifient lingalit de liouville puissance @xmath90 ) . on ne rentrera pas dans les dtails . * notations et conventions * : on fixe un rseau @xmath660 et @xmath661 . on suppose que @xmath662 contient un point primitif , donc @xmath663 pour tout @xmath664 . les nombres quadratiques auxquels on sintresse sont de la forme @xmath665 avec @xmath666 , que lon notera toujours comme @xmath463 . en pratique , les constantes @xmath667 sont bornes et lon na pas besoin dindiquer leur rles dans les constante implicites . on note @xmath668 . et lon dfinit @xmath669 il existe @xmath670 une base de @xmath109 telle que @xmath671 puisque @xmath662 contient un point primitif , donc @xmath672}\\ & = \prod_{p\nmid \det(\lambda)}\left(1-\frac{1}{p^2}\right)\prod_{p|\det(\lambda)}\left(1-\frac{1}{p}\right)\frac{1}{p^{v_p(\det(\lambda))}}\\ & = \frac{1}{\det(\lambda)}\frac{6}{\pi^2}\prod_{p|\det(\lambda)}\frac{1-p^{-1}}{1-p^{-2}}=\frac{6}{\pi^2}\frac{\psi_1(\det(\lambda))}{\det(\lambda ) } \end{split}\ ] ] o @xmath673 on voudrait estimer le cardinal de lensemble suivant @xmath674 pour rduire la difficult technique et pour obtenir une formule asymptotique , nous allons imposer plusieurs conditions techniques . on ne prtend pas que les coefficients dans et soient optimaux mais ils suffisent pour lutilisation ultrieure . @xmath675 @xmath676 @xmath677 en gros , le but dimposer la condition est de rduire le problme de dnombrement lquidistribution modulo @xmath65 , et celui de la condition est dobtenir un meilleur terme derreur . [ th : zoomingonlattices ] avec les hypothses ci - dessus , on a @xmath678 rappelons que lon peut aussi interprter @xmath679 , dans lesprit de lquidistribution , comme @xmath680 qui correspond la probabilit pour un point de @xmath681 provenant dun lment de @xmath662 primitif dans @xmath109 . le deuxime terme derreur peut facilement dpasser le terme principal quand @xmath682 est trop petit et @xmath683 est trop grand , ce qui perd lintrt de la formule . toutefois pour notre utilisation ultrieure il y aura des relations troites entre @xmath684 . il savre quen fait ce sera le premier terme derreur qui contribuera plus que le deuxime . lide de la dmonstration est que les points que lon veut dnombrer sont dans un triangle . toute transformation dfinie par une matrice lenvoie sur un autre triangle do nt laire est celle du triangle initial divis par le dterminant et la pente de lune des bords correspond un nouveau nombre quadratique approcher , que lon notera @xmath685 , ce qui nous permet de se ramener au cas trait prcdemment et appliquer la mme technique . commenons par quelques prparations . on prend un rseau @xmath686 . on choisit une base @xmath687 engendrant @xmath688 telle que ( cf . @xcite p. 135 ) @xmath689 o @xmath690 dsigne le @xmath691-me minima successif de @xmath688 par rapport la norme symtrique et convexe @xmath692 : @xmath693 le thorme de minkowski ( cf . * theorem v , viii 4.3 ) ) dit que @xmath694 on dfinit @xmath695 quitte remplacer @xmath696 par son oppos , on peut supposer que @xmath697 on tablit un thorme de liouville effectif , savoir , avec des constantes explicites . [ po : effectiveliouville ] pour tout @xmath698 , on a @xmath699 o on peut prendre @xmath700 on va reprendre la dmonstration de lingalit de liouville respectivement pour @xmath463 et @xmath68 . on note @xmath701 le polynme minimal sur @xmath395 du nombre quadratique @xmath702 . alors @xmath703 est un polynme entier qui annule @xmath68 . dune part comme @xmath704 , on a @xmath705 dautre part , daprs le thorme de valeur moyenne , pour @xmath706\alpha-1,\alpha+1\mathclose[$ ] et @xmath707\theta-1,\theta+1\mathclose[$ ] , @xmath708 puisque @xmath709 @xmath710 daprs les thormes de minkowski , en rappelant le choix de @xmath711 et @xmath712 , il en dcoule que @xmath713 @xmath714 do @xmath715 les ingalits sont triviales si @xmath716 dans le cas contraire les ingalits rsultent de , , , . on en dduit lencadrement suivant qui sera utilis frquemment . [ co : rangeoflambdamu2 ] on a @xmath717 premirement , @xmath718 pour la minoration on utilise les ingalits : @xmath719 [ co : discrepancyfortheta ] pour @xmath720 , on a @xmath721 ceci rsulte du lemme [ le : boundforboundquotients ] et de la proposition [ po : effectiveliouville ] . avant de commencer de dnombrer lensemble , on prsente deux conditions supplmentaires qui sont des consquences des conditions et pour @xmath722 , @xmath723 @xmath724 puisque @xmath725 premirement , comme toujours , on utilise linversion de mbius pour liminer la coprimalit : @xmath726 o @xmath727 pour dduire une borne prcise pour @xmath32 nous suivons . pour tout @xmath728 , on note @xmath729 . en utilisant la proposition [ po : effectiveliouville ] , on a @xmath730 do @xmath731 notons que @xmath732 ltape suivante consiste liminer la condition de rseau sur @xmath733 pour les @xmath32 petits . pour contrler la contribution des @xmath32 grands on peut utiliser la majoration donne par . on utilisera les notations , , pour le rseau @xmath734 , cest - - dire @xmath735 . on crit @xmath736 avec @xmath737 . on voudrait se ramener au dnombrement sur @xmath738 puisquil ny a plus de contraints sur la divisibilit de @xmath739 . avec les notations ci - dessus lensemble scrit @xmath740 * cas i. @xmath32 est petit . * on va estimer le cardinal de @xmath741 quand @xmath32 vrifie la condition @xmath742 la condition assure que tels @xmath32 existent . dabord on dtermine le signe de @xmath739 . en utilisant le corollaire [ co : rangeoflambdamu2 ] et en rappelant la condition , on a @xmath743 cela implique non seulement que pour @xmath744 fix , il y a au plus un @xmath745 tel que @xmath746 , mais aussi que , pour un rseau @xmath747 fix , on a @xmath748 . on ne peut avoir quune seule possibilit parce que le signe de @xmath739 dtermine aussi le signe de @xmath378 , que lon a suppos tre positif . donc dans la suite , sans perte de gnralit on suppose que @xmath739 sont positifs . en fait on a dans ce cas @xmath749 ( sinon on aurait @xmath750 et do @xmath751 ) . on dfinit lensemble @xmath752 des couples @xmath753 vrifiant @xmath754 et lensemble @xmath755 ( rappelons la notation @xmath756 . ) on a @xmath757 . soit @xmath746 . on a @xmath758 daprs et le corollaire [ co : rangeoflambdamu2 ] , on a @xmath759 notons aussi que , daprs le corollaire [ co : rangeoflambdamu2 ] , , et , @xmath760 donc @xmath761 deuximement , @xmath762 on va montrer que pour tout @xmath763 , @xmath764 en particulier , comme on a @xmath765 , cela implique que @xmath766 et donc le lemme . si @xmath746 , daprs lestimation et la proposition [ po : effectiveliouville ] , @xmath767 pour @xmath768 , on dduit directement du corollaire [ co : rangeoflambdamu2 ] que @xmath769 on en conclut @xmath770 et @xmath771 pour que soit vraie , il suffit que @xmath772 il suffit donc que @xmath773 daprs la condition et la condition sur @xmath32 , on a @xmath774 ce qui implique que @xmath775 donc lingalit qui fallait dmontrer dcoule de . maintenant on dcoupe lintervalle @xmath776\ ] ] en @xmath489 pices ( avec @xmath489 dterminer ) @xmath777,\quad 1\leqslant k\leqslant n.\ ] ] on applique le thorme [ th : koksma - denjoy ] . @xmath778 pour @xmath779 , on dfinit @xmath780 on a @xmath781 donc daprs le thorme [ th : koksma - denjoy ] avec le terme derreur prcis ( corollaire [ co : discrepancyfortheta ] ) , @xmath782 @xmath783 donc @xmath784 on calcule maintenant le terme derreur provenant du changement de @xmath744 en les valeurs du bord des intervalles . en appliquant le thorme [ th : koksma - denjoy ] la fonction auxiliaire @xmath785 on obtient @xmath786 on en conclut que @xmath787 grce la condition , @xmath788 en sommant sur tous les @xmath2 pour le premier terme ( le terme principal ) @xmath789 puis sur les termes derreur @xmath790 on obtient que @xmath791 il nous reste majorer le terme derreur venant du cardinal de @xmath752 . @xmath792 grce la condition . on en conclut que @xmath793 on choisit @xmath794 comme @xmath795 , la condition assure que @xmath561 . on conclut que @xmath796 maintenant on somme sur tous les @xmath32 petits . dabord faisons - le pour le terme principal . en rappelant la constante @xmath679 et en remarquant que @xmath797 , @xmath798 ensuite pour le terme derreur @xmath799 * cas ii . @xmath32 est grand . * pour les @xmath32 vrifiant @xmath800 on utilise la formule de la proposition [ po : smallepsilon ] avec @xmath801 , notant que la condition implique lhypothse de la proposition . on obtient @xmath802 donc la contribution totale provenant de ces @xmath32 est dordre de grandeur @xmath803 la formule est dduite de et . le thorme [ th : secondtheorem ] ne couvre pas le zoom critique des nombres algbriques de degr plus grand que @xmath90 . les experts semblent penser que lexpansion en fraction continue dun nombre algbrique @xmath463 de degr @xmath461 na pas de quotients partiels borns . cest - - dire que pour tout rel @xmath188 , il existe toujours des nombres rationnels @xmath470 vrifiant @xmath804 en terme de la distribution locale ( critique ) , on pourrait interprter cela comme : les nombres rationnels proches de @xmath463 seraient beaucoup plus nombreux que dans le cas quadratique et on naurait plus de phnomne de trou . la surface @xmath13 est une surface torique qui nest pas de fano . elle est construite comme lclatement des @xmath14 points invariants de @xmath0 . elle peut tre aussi obtenue en clatant plus de points invariants sous laction du tore sur la surface torique @xmath805 , qui est une surface de del pezzo torique de degr @xmath46 tudie dans @xcite . dans la suite on prend le premier point de vue . on considre la surface torique @xmath13 obtenue en clatant @xmath806 en @xmath14 points invariants @xmath807\times [ 1:0],[0:1]\times[1:0],[1:0]\times[0:1],[0:1]\times[0:1]$ ] . lventail de @xmath113 est le suivant . ] on note @xmath808 les tirs en arrire de sections hyperplans dans chaque @xmath809 , et @xmath810 les images inverses des points clats . en dehors des points clats on utilise encore les coordonnes @xmath811\times[s : t]$ ] de @xmath806 . les gnrateurs @xmath812 des raies de lventail de @xmath13 vrifient les relations @xmath813 ce sont toutes les _ collections primitives _ ( @xcite definition 2.6 , 2.7 , proposition 3.2 ) minimales centres pour @xmath13 . pour les varits toriques lisses complte , les collection primitives minimales centres reprsentent les courbes rationnelles de degr anticanonique minimal . dans notre cas ils correspondent @xmath14 courbes rationnelles de degr lisses @xmath90 relativement au fibr anticanonique passant par @xmath15\times[1:1]$ ] , que lon appellera les courbes spciales et lon notera @xmath814 dquations respectives @xmath815 elles appartiennent , respectivement , aux classes de @xmath816 dans le groupe de picard . pour chacun de ces fibrs il existe un unique diviseur irrductible passant par @xmath17 . il y a @xmath14 familles de courbes rationnelles de degr @xmath817 relativement au fibr anticanonique passant par @xmath17 qui sont lisses , do nt les classes sont @xmath818 le diviseur anticanonique @xmath819 do nt les sections globales sont des combinaisons linaires des monmes @xmath820 est engendr par ses sections globales mais il nest pas ample . sur louvert @xmath821 , en utilisant les coordonnes @xmath822 , on identifie localement lespace tangent de @xmath17 @xmath823 par le diffomorphisme @xmath824\times [ s : t]\longmapsto \left(\frac{y}{x}-1,\frac{t}{s}-1\right)=(w-1,z-1).\ ] ] avec cette identification , les @xmath14 courbes spciales scrivent comme @xmath817 droites et une hyperbole de degr anticanonique @xmath90 : @xmath825 maintenant on associe une hauteur de weil @xmath826.tout dabord pour un point @xmath827\times[s : t]$ ] avec @xmath828 nappartenant pas aux diviseurs exceptionnels , @xmath829 donc on peut prendre comme hauteur de weil @xmath830 par symtrie on peut se ramener la rgion @xmath831 on note @xmath832 pour @xmath827\times[s : t]\in v$ ] , la hauteur se calcule comme @xmath833 la distance que lon va utiliser est @xmath834 nous allons montrer que la meilleure constante dapproximation est @xmath90 par une estimation directe . [ po : lowerbound1 ] @xmath835 pour @xmath827\times[s : t]\neq q$ ] satisfaisant @xmath836 ( les cas o @xmath837 se dmontre de faon analogue ) , on a @xmath838 cela montre que @xmath839 . mais les courbes spciales @xmath18 donnent des sous - varits avec @xmath840 ( remarque [ rmk : thmofmckinnon ] ) . ceci clt la dmonstration . cette majoration uniforme indique un phnomne de trou en dimension @xmath90 dans le zoom critique . cest - - dire , il existe @xmath841 tel que pour tout @xmath842 , et pour tout @xmath61 , on ait @xmath843 . ceci peut aussi sinterprter comme une ingalit du type liouville : @xmath844 considrons les courbes @xmath845 avec les coordonnes @xmath846 , cette quation scrit @xmath847 elles forment donc une famille de courbes cubiques passant par les @xmath14 points invariants avec un point singulier @xmath17 . la classe de @xmath848 dans le groupe de picard est la mme que celle de @xmath826 et on a @xmath849 si @xmath850 , la courbe @xmath851 a en fait deux composantes irrductibles @xmath852 lorsque @xmath853 , la courbe @xmath854 est une courbe cubique gomtriquement intgre qui est nodale . si @xmath853 , le polynme @xmath855 est irrductible sur @xmath856 $ ] . une courbe cubique irrductible singulire ne peut pas avoir quun point singulier qui est nodal ou cuspidal . les tangentes au point @xmath17 sont de pente @xmath857 donc @xmath17 est un point nodal de @xmath854 . [ le : curvescoverallpoints ] pour tout point rationnel @xmath858 o @xmath859 , il existe une unique courbe @xmath854 passant par ce point . on crit ( de faon unique ) le quotient en une fraction positive rduite : @xmath860 alors @xmath861 . gomtriquement , on considre @xmath862 lclatement de @xmath13 en @xmath17 , et on note @xmath863 la transformation stricte de @xmath854 . alors @xmath863 est une normalisation de @xmath854 et @xmath864 . on peut voir @xmath865 comme lune des coordonnes de @xmath866 . * cas i. * @xmath867 sont deux carrs de nombres entiers . alors @xmath868 et @xmath869 . approcher @xmath17 sur la courbe revient approcher un nombre rationnel par des nombres rationnels . donc @xmath870 * cas ii . * lun des @xmath867 nest pas le carr dun entier , ( not @xmath871 ) comme @xmath872 et @xmath683 sont premiers entre eux , @xmath873 . aucun des points @xmath874 nest dfini sur @xmath44 . lapproximation du point @xmath17 le long une branche de @xmath854 est quivalente lapproximation du point _ irrationnel quadratique _ @xmath866 ( dpendant de la branche choisie ) le long @xmath863 . donc dans ce cas daprs le thorme [ th : approximationtheorem1 ] , @xmath875 cependant , pour les @xmath14 courbes spciales @xmath18 , lapproximation au point @xmath17 est vraiment une approximation dun point rationnel dfini sur @xmath12 sur @xmath67 , savoir @xmath876 . bien quelle aient la mme constante dapproximation , le nombre des points rationnels que lon trouve dans lopration de zoom sont de grandeur trs diffrente . cest cette diffrence qui explique les phnomnes radicalement diffrents entre les deux types de courbes ci - dessus . on en conclut [ th : approximationessential ] on a @xmath877 par consquent , il ny a pas de sous - varits localement accumulatrices ( dfinition [ df : essential ] ) . cela rsulte du fait que lensemble des @xmath854 vrifiant la condition ( h ) est dense ( mme pour la topologie analytique ) et de la borne infrieure que lon a tablies prcdemment ( proposition [ po : lowerbound1 ] ) donc la famille @xmath878 donnent une autre faon de paramtrer les points rationnels bien adapte notre problme car la constante dapproximation sur elles est @xmath90 , plus petite celle donne par les droites gnrales . nous utiliserons les courbes nodales @xmath854 pour paramtrer les points rationnels autour de @xmath17 . nous avons vu quelles nont pas la mme constante dapproximation et nous avons constat que lapproximation essentielle est prise sur celles vrifiant la condition @xmath871 . regardons dabord ce que la prdiction nave nous donne . on note @xmath30 le facteur de zoom et @xmath61 la borne de la hauteur . alors dans le zoom de facteur @xmath30 le nombre de points rationnels dans le voisinage de diamtre @xmath879 devrait tre @xmath880 si @xmath881 , on devrait pouvoir trouver beaucoup de points cest - - dire de cardinal au moins une puissance de @xmath61 . si @xmath51 , _ a priori _ cette heuristique ne prdit pas grande chose . nous allons montrer quen fait il y a au plus un nombre fini de points en dehors des courbes spciales dans ce dernier cas . nous nous bornons la rgion @xmath882 . puisque les droites @xmath883 forment le bord du domaine @xmath882 , il reste trouver la distribution dans lintrieur de @xmath882 . grce au lemme [ le : curvescoverallpoints ] , les courbes nodales donnent un paramtrage local des points rationnels . donc le dnombrement des points rationnels dans lintrieur de @xmath882 peut se dcomposer en des sommes des points sur chaque @xmath854 . on va calculer la formule de la hauteur restreinte @xmath854 en choisissant un paramtrage rationnel des coordonnes de @xmath67 pour la courbe nodale . par la formule , seulement les courbes @xmath854 avec @xmath666 intersectent @xmath882 . on fixe un couple @xmath884 vrifiant la condition @xmath666 . dabord on change les coordonnes @xmath885 en @xmath886 . alors lquation de @xmath854 devient @xmath887 daprs le principe de bzout , une droite gnrale intersecte @xmath854 en @xmath817 points ( comptant la multiplicit ) . la droite @xmath888 passe par @xmath889 la multiplicit dintersection @xmath890 en @xmath889 est @xmath90 . donc cette droite intersecte @xmath854 en un autre point rationnel @xmath891 diffrent de @xmath889 avec @xmath892 . un calcul nous donne @xmath893 revenons aux coordonnes @xmath885 . @xmath894 donc on obtient un morphisme de paramtrage @xmath895 @xmath328\longmapsto \left(\frac{\frac{u}{v } a(\frac{u}{v}-1)}{b-\frac{u}{v } a},\frac{b(\frac{u}{v}-1)}{\frac{u}{v}(b-\frac{u}{v } a)}\right)=\left(\frac{ua(u - v)}{v(bv - ua)},\frac{bv(u - v)}{u(bv - ua)}\right).\ ] ] on introduit la notation @xmath896 alors @xmath897 et de la mme faon , @xmath898 on trouve le paramtrage suivant pour les coordonnes primitives dans @xmath0 . @xmath899 on a alors @xmath900 @xmath901 @xmath902 @xmath903 enfin on obtient la formule de la hauteur restreinte @xmath854 induite par limage inverse sur @xmath67 dans la rgion @xmath882 : pour @xmath337\in { \mathbb{p}}^1 $ ] satisfaisant @xmath904 , @xmath905))&=\frac{t^2 xy}{\operatorname{\operatorname{pgcd}}(x , s)\operatorname{\operatorname{pgcd}}(x , t)\operatorname{\operatorname{pgcd}}(y , s)\operatorname{\operatorname{pgcd}}(y , t)}\\ & = \frac{b(ua(u - v))^2}{(\operatorname{\operatorname{pgcd}}(v , a)\operatorname{\operatorname{pgcd}}(u , b)\operatorname{\operatorname{pgcd}}(u - v , b - a))^2}\\ & = \frac{b(ua(u - v))^2}{(d_1d_2d_3)^2}.\end{aligned}\ ] ] pour @xmath522 fixs , on prend la fonction de test @xmath36 et lon regarde la distribution locale dans le voisinage de diamtre @xmath879 intersectant la rgion @xmath882 , cest - - dire la quantit @xmath906\times[s : t]\\ & x , y , s , t>0;\frac{t}{s}>\frac{x}{y}>1 \end{aligned } \left| \begin{aligned } & b^{\frac{1}{r}}{\operatorname{d}}(p)=b^{\frac{1}{r}}\left(\frac{t}{s}-1\right)\leqslant \varepsilon \\ & \operatorname{h}_{\omega_{y_4}^{-1}}(p)=\frac{t^2 xy}{\operatorname{\operatorname{pgcd}}(x , s)\operatorname{\operatorname{pgcd}}(x , t)\operatorname{\operatorname{pgcd}}(y , s)\operatorname{\operatorname{pgcd}}(y , t)}\leqslant b \end{aligned } \right\}\right.\ ] ] on le prcisera comme un problme de dnombrement . pour un couple @xmath907 satisfaisant @xmath666 , considrons lensemble @xmath908 des @xmath337\in{\mathbb{p}}^1 $ ] vrifiant ( cf . ) @xmath909 @xmath910)=\frac{b(ua(u - v))^2}{(\operatorname{\operatorname{pgcd}}(v , a)\operatorname{\operatorname{pgcd}}(u , b)\operatorname{\operatorname{pgcd}}(u - v , b - a))^2}\leqslant b .\ ] ] alors @xmath911 [ th : finitenessofcriticzoom ] pour tout @xmath35 , on a que , pour tout @xmath363 , @xmath912 par consquent , la sous - varit @xmath913 est celle localement faiblement accumulatrice ( dfinition [ df : weaklocal ] ) . il nexiste pas de mesure limite pour le zoom critique . on dmontre dabord que , pour @xmath35 fix , en utilisant le paramtrage ci - dessus , dans le cas critique ( @xmath51 ) , il ny a quun nombre fini de courbes @xmath854 qui interviennent . en factorisant @xmath378 , lingalit scrit @xmath914 donc @xmath915 donc en combinant avec , on en dduit @xmath916 do @xmath917 notons que @xmath918 sont premiers deux deux . une observation importante est que @xmath919 et donc @xmath920 cela nous donne la majoration du paramtre @xmath683 pour @xmath51 : @xmath921 ce qui signifie que dans un voisinage fix aprs zoom , le nombre de courbes nodales est uniformment major , savoir @xmath922 parmi ces courbes @xmath854 qui interviennent , si @xmath923 , on a @xmath924 . alors la proposition [ po : weakzoom ] nous donne que @xmath925 pour tout @xmath363 . pour tous les @xmath871 , sur @xmath67 ( limage inverse de @xmath926 ) on a une distance et une hauteur induites de celles sur @xmath13 , la hauteur tant quivalente la hauteur de weil canonique @xmath927 ( cf . , ) . comme , le zoom induit sur @xmath854 avec le facteur @xmath51 est exactement le zoom critique . la majoration dcoule donc de la proposition [ po : controlofepsilon ] . daprs le thorme [ th : criticzoomforquadratics ] , pour tout @xmath330 suffisamment proches , on a @xmath928 alors que pour tout @xmath871 , il existe certains couples @xmath416 tels que @xmath929 cela dmontre la non - existence de mesure limite . le fait que @xmath18 est localement faiblement accumulatrice dcoule du thorme [ th : pagelot ] puisque @xmath930 sur @xmath18 et donc @xmath931 on va dmontrer une borne infrieure du nombre de points rationnels dans le zoom sous - critique ( @xmath932 ) bas sur le fait que sur certaines courbes nodales on trouve beaucoup de points avec la hauteur et la distance induites ( thorme [ th : zoomingonlattices ] ) . fixons @xmath933 . nous nous bornons la rgion @xmath934 lnonc prcis est le suivant . rappelons que @xmath935 . [ th : lowerbound ] pour @xmath936on a @xmath937 o le symbole @xmath938 signifie que la somme est prise sur les @xmath939 et les ensembles @xmath940 sont dfinis de manire analogue @xmath908 en remplaant par @xmath941 et @xmath942 au vu de , on va appliquer le thorme [ th : zoomingonlattices ] pour compter le nombre de points dans le zoom de facteur @xmath30 induit sur chaque @xmath854 , savoir le cardinal de chaque @xmath940 , avec un terme derreur prcis . on rappelle la dfinition de la fonction @xmath943 . on dfinit une fonction multiplicative @xmath944 [ po : zoompointsoncab ] supposons que @xmath945 alors pour tout couple @xmath946 satisfaisant , @xmath947 on a que , pour tout @xmath948 , @xmath949 si lon identifie localement une branche de @xmath854 avec lespace tangent de @xmath67 en le point @xmath321 , la proposition [ po : zoompointsoncab ] indique quil existe une quidistribution sur chaque @xmath854 ( @xmath871 ) avec la hauteur et la distance induites ( cf . , ) . il suffit compter le cardinal de @xmath950 pour @xmath879 fix . la condition correspond la restriction de la hauteur @xmath951 sur @xmath854 , et une inversion de mbius conduit une condition de rseau . dans un premier temps on voudrait rduire la condition en un zoom avec dune distance induite sur limage inverse de @xmath952 pour que lon puisse appliquer le thorme [ th : zoomingonlattices ] . on va approcher le cardinal de lensemble @xmath950 par celui de lensemble @xmath953 des @xmath337 $ ] satisfaisant @xmath954 @xmath955 on compare maintenant ces deux ensembles . compte tenu lencadrement sur @xmath87 , la condition implique que @xmath956 en combinant avec la majoration de @xmath378 obtenue partir de la condition , on conclut que @xmath957 de plus en rappelant lhypothse sur @xmath946 , on a daprs , @xmath958 donc @xmath959 cela implique que @xmath960 o @xmath961 avec @xmath962 . ensuite on va borner le cardinal de @xmath963 . par une inversion de mbius , on a @xmath964 o @xmath965 le points dans cet ensemble se trouvent dans iintersection dun triangle do nt lorigine est lun de ses sommets et laire est de grandeur @xmath966 avec le rseau @xmath967 puisque @xmath968 pour @xmath969 , on vrifie que @xmath970 le lemme suivant nous permet de contrler le nombre des points entiers primitifs dans une rgion planaire autour de lorigine . pour une dmonstration , voir ( * ? ? ? * lemma 2 ) . [ le : countinglatticepointsinsmalldomains ] soit @xmath971 un rseau . soit @xmath972 convexe do nt le bord est lisse par morceau avec @xmath973 . alors @xmath974 en utilisant ce lemme , on obtient que pour tout @xmath975 , comme @xmath976 ( @xcite i.5 corollary 5.3 ) , @xmath977 ( * ? ? ? * theorem 5.7 ) , @xmath978 o @xmath979 peuvent tre arbitrairement petits . on en conclut que @xmath980 maintenant on compte le cardinal de @xmath981 . comme on a fait pour @xmath963 , et par une inversion de mbius on obtient @xmath982 o @xmath983 nous allons appliquer le thorme [ th : zoomingonlattices ] . cette fin on prend dans @xmath984 notons quici la signification de @xmath61 et @xmath30 sont diffrentes . on prend @xmath985 la condition sur @xmath30 et @xmath683 implique les condition - . la condition se traduit en @xmath986 en utilisant la majoration @xmath987 la condition sur @xmath683 entrane que @xmath988 do la condition . de plus , sur @xmath30 entrane que @xmath989 et pour un tel @xmath30 on a @xmath990 donc implique la condition suivante vrifies de la mme faon , qui elle - mme implique pour tout @xmath991 @xmath992 _ suite de la dmonstration de la proposition [ po : zoompointsoncab]_. donc on peut appliquer le thorme [ th : zoomingonlattices ] avec les quantits @xmath993 ci - dessus et on obtient @xmath994 en reportant dans , on calcule la somme du coefficient du terme principal @xmath995 rappelons la majoration pour la fonction @xmath996 , ( * ? ? ? * theorem 5.7 ) @xmath997 on peut majorer le terme derreur de la faon suivante . pour tout @xmath948 , @xmath998 et pour tout @xmath999 , @xmath1000 compte tenu le terme derreur provenant du cardinal de @xmath1001 , on en conclut la formule asymptotique sur chaque courbe @xmath854 . tout dabord rappelons le diffomorphisme local @xmath1002 et les notations de coordonnes de lespace tangent @xmath1003 on dduit un encadrement des @xmath946 tels que la courbe @xmath854 intervienne dans le dnombrement quand on prend la fonction caractristique @xmath1004 de la rgion @xmath1005 dans @xmath882 . la condition de zoom dit que @xmath1006 prenons un couple @xmath946 vrifiant la condition , daprs lquation dfinissant limage de la courbe @xmath854 , on a @xmath1007 on note @xmath1008 sil existe @xmath1009 , alors daprs on a @xmath1010 maintenant prenons un couple @xmath946 vrifiant et @xmath1011 puisque un point @xmath1012 vrifie @xmath1013 la condition de zoom implique que sur la courbe @xmath854 , si @xmath1014 , @xmath1015 donc @xmath1016 donne un point de @xmath1017 . on restreint le dnombrement sur les @xmath946 tels que @xmath871 car cest sur telles @xmath854 quon trouve une quidistribution de points pour le zoom sous - critique ( proposition [ po : zoompointsoncab ] ) . on en conclut que @xmath1018 comme ( cf . , ) @xmath1019 do @xmath1020 et leur diffrence est petite . le terme principal sur chaque courbe nodal fait apparatre la fonction @xmath1021 qui ressemble la fonction @xmath94 cest - - dire au nombre de diviseurs au sens de la convolution , do nt lordre moyen de ce type est connu grce une srie de travaux de r. de la bretche et t. d. browning ( @xcite,@xcite,@xcite ) . on donnera les dtails dans les appendices , o nous dcrivons les rsultats . on est en mesure de sommer les courbes @xmath854 sur les paramtres @xmath946 vrifiant @xmath1022 qui correspond . afin dappliquer la proposition [ po : asymptoticforpsiquotient ] sur lordre moyen des diviseurs de formes binaires , on tend la somme sur les @xmath946 vrifiant la condition @xmath1023 en rajoutant les @xmath946 vrifiant la condition @xmath923 . le terme derreur correspondant est de grandeur @xmath1024 pour tout @xmath10250,1\mathclose[$ ] . daprs la formule [ po : asymptoticforpsiquotient ] de la proposition [ po : problemofdivisor ] , la somme des termes principaux de donne @xmath1026\varepsilon_2,\varepsilon_1\mathclose]\\t\in\mathopen]\tau_2,\tau_1\mathclose[}}\frac{1}{t^{2 } } \operatorname{d}t\operatorname{d}y\right)b^{(1+\eta)\left(\frac{1}{2}-\frac{1}{r}\right)}(\log b)^3 + o ( b^{(1+\eta)\left(\frac{1}{2}-\frac{1}{r}\right)}(\log b)^2 ) \\ & = \left(c_2\int \chi(w(\varepsilon_1,\varepsilon_2,\tau_1,\tau_2))\frac{\operatorname{d } x\operatorname{d}y}{y}\right)b^{(1+\eta)\left(\frac{1}{2}-\frac{1}{r}\right)}(\log b)^3+o ( b^{(1+\eta)\left(\frac{1}{2}-\frac{1}{r}\right)}(\log b)^2 ) . \end{aligned}\ ] ] la contribution de la somme des termes derreur dans la proposition [ po : zoompointsoncab ] est majore par @xmath1027 grce la condition sur @xmath30 et pour @xmath1028 la contribution de la somme du terme derreur dans est , en utilisant la formule [ po : asymptoticforpsiquotient ] encore , @xmath1029 cela termine la preuve du thorme [ th : lowerbound ] . nous expliquons une raison pour laquelle nous ne choisissons pas tablir une formule asymptotique pour le zoom sous - critique . comme lon a vu , la prdiction nave affirme que la puissance de @xmath61 devrait tre @xmath1030 . en fait on a @xmath1031 daprs . le terme principal de la borne infrieure ( thorme [ th : lowerbound ] ) deviendrait @xmath1032 si lon pourrait prendre la constante @xmath63 . une difficult se cache sur lexactitude de la formule pour les paramtres @xmath946 grands ( cest - - dire @xmath1033 pour certain @xmath1034 ) . dans ce cas le zoom sur la courbe nodale @xmath854 compte au plus un point et la technique utilise dans ce texte ne permet pas de dterminer sil est non - nul ou pas . dans @xcite , nous avons surmont un obstacle similaire laide de la transformation de cremona . mais cette astuce nest plus applicable ici car la transformation de cremona prserve les courbes @xmath854 . le but de cette section est de signaler le fait que les points de @xmath13 sont en bijection avec un ensemble mince de @xmath0 . notons que , outre le morphisme dimplosion utilis jusqu maintenant , la surface @xmath13 possde un autre morphisme vers @xmath0 comme suit . le diviseur @xmath826 dfinit un morphisme birationnel @xmath1035 do nt limage @xmath113 est une surface torique de del pezzo de degr @xmath14 singulire de type @xmath1036 dfinie comme lintersection de deux quadriques dans @xmath1037 : @xmath1038 et lventail est un croix qui ressemble celui de @xmath0 . ] le morphisme @xmath60 est en fait la dsingularisation minimale torique de @xmath113 puisque les diviseurs @xmath1039 @xmath1040 ont le nombre dauto - intersection @xmath1041 . lquation @xmath1042 implique ( comme pour toute surface de del pezzo de degr @xmath14 fibre en conique ) que @xmath13 possde deux projections vers la droite projective , et donc un morphisme @xmath1043 vers @xmath0 qui est fini de degr gnrique @xmath90 . plus prcisment , @xmath1043 est dfini de la faon suivante . dabord la projection @xmath1044 depuis le point @xmath1045 $ ] est bien dfinie sur @xmath113 . la varit de produit sinjecte sur @xmath1046 comme une surface quadrique : @xmath328\times[s : t]\longmapsto [ us : vt : ut : vs].\ ] ] si lon utilise les coordonnes @xmath1047 $ ] venant de @xmath1037 , limage de @xmath0 est dfinie par lquation . en rappelons les quations , @xmath1048 induit un morphisme @xmath1049 de degr gnrique @xmath90 do nt limage est un ensemble _ mince _ de @xmath1050 : @xmath1051\times [ s : t]:uvst\in\square\}.\ ] ] en les composant , on voit que le morphisme @xmath1052 est un revtement lisse de degr gnrique @xmath90 . de plus , on a @xmath1053 le lieu de ramification est sur les diviseur du bord , donc autour du point @xmath1054\times[1:1]$ ] , @xmath60 est un diffomorphisme . par la fonctorialit de la hauteur on peut se ramener au cas de @xmath0 restreinte lensemble mince . dans cette section , on produira des varits toriques de dimension suprieure sur lesquelles en dehors un ferm de zariski les meilleures approximants se trouvent dans une famille de courbes nodales , comme pour @xmath13 . elles sont construites en fait comme produits de @xmath13 avec dautres varits toriques . pour tout @xmath1055 , considrons la varit @xmath1056 . on note @xmath1057 les morphismes de projection vers @xmath13 et @xmath1058 . pour @xmath1059 dans lorbite ouverte , on a @xmath1060 qui est atteinte sur une famille de courbes nodales couvrant un ouvert dense de @xmath1061 . on peut supposer que @xmath1062 a pour coordonnes @xmath1054\times [ 1:1]$ ] et @xmath1063 $ ] . tout dabord , comme @xmath1064 , on choisit la hauteur de weil associe @xmath1065 comme @xmath1066)=h_{\omega_{y_4}^{-1}}(x)h_{\omega_{{\mathbb{p}}^n}^{-1}}([y_0:\cdots : y_n ] ) , \quad h_{\omega_{{\mathbb{p}}^n}^{-1}}([y_0:\cdots : y_n])=\max_{0\leqslant i\leqslant n}(|y_i|)^{n+1},\ ] ] et la distance @xmath32 comme le maximum de celle @xmath1067 sur @xmath13 et @xmath1068 sur @xmath1058 dfinie par la formule ( pour @xmath1069 ) , @xmath1070)=\max_{1\leqslant i\leqslant n}\left|\frac{y_i}{y_0}-1\right|.\ ] ] par dfinition , si @xmath1071\neq q$ ] , @xmath1070)^{n+1}h_{\omega_{{\mathbb{p}}^n}^{-1}}([y_0:\cdots : y_n])\geqslant 1.\ ] ] donc pour un point gnral @xmath1072 tel que @xmath1073 , on a , daprs la proposition [ po : lowerbound1 ] , @xmath1074 cela dmontre que @xmath1075 . ensuite on construit des courbes nodales dans @xmath1061 partir de celles dans @xmath13 . avec les notations dans la section [ se : cab ] , pour @xmath1076 , on a construit une courbe nodale @xmath854 dans @xmath13 avec le morphisme de paramtrage @xmath926 . maintenant on prend une droite @xmath1077 dans @xmath1058 avec un paramtrage @xmath1078 qui envoie @xmath1079 $ ] sur @xmath1080 . on dfinit un morphisme de paramtrage comme suit @xmath1081 @xmath1082)=(\psi_{a , b}([u : v]),\psi_l\circ \theta_{a , b}([u : v])),\ ] ] o @xmath1083 est dfini comme le revtement double @xmath1084)=[au^2-bv^2:v^2].\ ] ] on voit que limage de @xmath1085 est une courbe rationnelle @xmath1086 nodale en @xmath1087)$ ] avec @xmath1088 comme @xmath1089 dfinit une droite double . on en dduit que @xmath1090 plus concrtement , comme lapproximation diophantienne des nombres quadratiques est quivalente la structure des quations de pell - fermat gnralises ( cf . section [ se : eqpellfermat ] ) , en choisissant une famille de solutions primitives @xmath320 de lquation @xmath1091 on obtient automatiquement une suite dapproximants @xmath1092)$ ] du point @xmath17 sur @xmath1061 . puisque lon a lquivalence de hauteurs @xmath1093)\sim y_n^{2n+6},\ ] ] et lquivalence de distances @xmath1094 on est ramen au problme de lapproximation diophantienne dun nombre quadratique particulier et la constante dapproximation se dduite des thormes de dirichlet , liouville , et roth . dans un souci de compltude , nous redmontrons le rsultat de s. pagelot concernant la distribution locale dun @xmath44-point @xmath17 sur la droite projective @xmath1095 . pour simplicit on suppose que @xmath1096 $ ] ; le rsultat pour un point gnral diffre par une constante . [ th : pagelot ] on a @xmath1097 . on fixe la hauteur de weil absolue associe au fibr @xmath66 dfinie par @xmath1098)=\max(|u|,|v|),\quad ( u , v)\in{\mathbb{z}},\quad\operatorname{\operatorname{pgcd}}(u , v)=1,\ ] ] et lon note @xmath1099 le facteur de zoom . soit @xmath60 une fonction intgrable support compact sur @xmath1100 . alors * si @xmath575 alors @xmath1101 o @xmath1102 * si @xmath474 , alors @xmath1103 on voit que das les deux cas la mesure asymptotique existe . pour le zoom critique , si @xmath1104 - 1,1\mathclose[$ ] , alors @xmath1105 . on observe donc quil y a un trou autour du point @xmath17 . pour un zoom sous - critique ( cest - - dire @xmath474 ) , la distribution est uniforme . rien dans cette section nest nouveau . le but est de rappeler comment traiter ce type de problme dans le cas le plus simple . une observation basique , qui est aussi celle que lon va suivre dans la suite , est quau lieu de considrer des fonctions intgrables gnrales , il suffit de regarder les fonctions simple , cest - - dire les fonctions caractristiques dintervalles , car ces fonctions suffisent pour caractriser la convergence faible de mesures de probabilit . on note les coordonnes de @xmath1106 par @xmath337 $ ] . sans perte de gnralit on peut supposer que @xmath1107 . puisque le point approcher est @xmath1096 $ ] , on utilise le diffomorphisme local @xmath25 dfini par @xmath328\longmapsto \frac{u}{v}\in{\mathbb{r}}.\ ] ] alors @xmath17 est envoy sur lorigine @xmath1108 . sur @xmath1100 on utilise la distance canonique @xmath1109,q)=\left|\frac{u}{v}\right|.\ ] ] par symtrie , il suffit dexaminer les fonctions caractristique des intervalles @xmath562\eta,\varepsilon\mathclose]\subset \mathopen]0,\infty[$ ] . on dsigne par @xmath1110 une telle fonction . nous remarquons ici que lusage de cette notation a un sens lgrement diffrent dans les parties prcdentes du texte . ltude de la convergence de la suite @xmath1111 revient lestimation du cardinal de lensemble @xmath1112\neq[0:1]\\ & \operatorname{\operatorname{pgcd}}(u , v)=1 \end{aligned } \left| \begin{aligned } & 0<b^{\frac{1}{r}}d(p , q)=b^{\frac{1}{r}}\frac{u}{v}\leqslant \varepsilon\\ & h(p)=\sup(u , v)\leqslant b \end{aligned } \right\}\right . , \ ] ] puisque @xmath1113 . les conditions sur @xmath591 implique que @xmath1114 cela implique quil ny a quun nombre fini de @xmath530 dans un voisinage fix et nous permet de fixer @xmath530 tout en comptant @xmath378 . on peut crire @xmath1115 o @xmath1116 on rappelle la dfinition de la fonction @xmath495 et lon en dduit , en utilisant ( * ? ? ? * exercise 5.2 ) @xmath1117 alors @xmath1118 cela clt la dmonstration du cas critique . comme prcdemment on a la dcomposition @xmath1119 o @xmath1120 fixons @xmath530 dans cette runion . pour que @xmath1121 soit non - vide , il faut que @xmath1122 avant de calculer le cardinal , citons dabord quelques formules asymptotique bien connues ( voir @xcite 3.2 , 3.4 ) : @xmath1123 @xmath1124 @xmath1125 en appliquant ces formules , on obtient , encore daprs ( * ? ? ? * exercise 5.2 ) @xmath1126 do @xmath1127 lexpression finale est acheve . quand @xmath474 , les points dnombrer se trouvent dans un triangle do nt la longueur du bord est ngligeable par rapport laire . on pourrait adapter la mthode utilise dans la dmonstration du mme problme pour les nombres irrationnels ( cf . thorme [ th : localdistributionofrealnumbers ] ) . le raisonnement dcrit ici donne un meilleur terme derreur au niveau de la puissance de @xmath1128 . lordre de grandeur des nombres de points dans les zooms pour @xmath67 tant en accord avec celui prvu , nous discutons maintenant quoi correspondent les mesures limites . prenons comme dhabitude la fonction caractristique @xmath331 . si lon identifie @xmath681 avec lensemble des points primitifs dans @xmath109 le comptage de points de hauteur borne @xmath1129 quivaut au comptage des points primitifs dans le rectangle @xmath1130 . lopration de zoom revient prendre des points primitifs dans lintrieur du triangle @xmath1131 do nt la taille dpend du facteur de zoom @xmath30 et de la borne @xmath61 . pour les zooms sous - critiques @xmath474 , lordre de grandeur de laire domine celui du bord , donc elle donne le terme principal . on a que @xmath1132 on voit que dans ce cas l les points primitifs sont quidistribus et lon obtient une mesure proportionnelle la mesure de lebesgue . cela concide avec celui du zoom sous - critique pour tous les nombres algbriques . pour le zoom critique @xmath575 , laire de @xmath1133 et son bord ont la mme dordre de grandeur @xmath61 . comme lon a vu dans la dmonstration , les points se trouvent en fait dans les droites horizontales dans lintrieur du triangle do nt la longeur est @xmath1134 puisque @xmath1135 o @xmath1136\frac{u}{\eta},\frac{u}{\varepsilon}\mathclose]\right\}.\ ] ] on en conclut que sur chaque droite on compte des nombres rationnels avec le numrateur fix . cela explique do viennent la fonction densit @xmath1137 et la fonction arithmtique @xmath603 . on remarque que le phnomne pour des nombres algbriques est radicalement diffrent ( pour eux dans le zoom de facteur @xmath65 on trouve aussi une quidistribution , voir la section [ se : weakzoomofalgebraicnumbers ] ) . dans @xcite , t. d. browning a tudi lordre moyen du nombre de diviseurs pour des formes binaires cubiques dployes , do nt la technique remonte @xcite , o les auteurs ont dduit une formule asymptotique de lordre moyen primitif de fonctions arithmtiques ressemblant la fonction donnant le nombres de diviseurs pour certaines formes binaires quartique . ils lutilisent pour dmontrer que le nombre de points de hauteur borne sur une surface de del pezzo de degr @xmath14 saccorde avec la prdiction de batyrev - manin - peyre . en les imitant , nous allons dduire une telle formule pour une forme binaire cubique particulire ( la mme dmonstration marche pour toutes les formes binaires cubiques dployes , ce do nt nous naurons pas besoin ici ) . on considre les fonctions arithmtiques @xmath1138 et la constante @xmath1139 : @xmath1140 [ po : problemofdivisor ] soient @xmath1141 , on a @xmath1142 @xmath1143 on fixe trois formes linaires coefficients entiers primitives @xmath1144 en deux variables deux deux linairement indpendantes et @xmath1145 un sous - ensemble convexe ferm born de @xmath1146 do nt les coordonnes sont notes @xmath1147 . pour @xmath1148 , on note @xmath1149 on suppose que @xmath1150 pour @xmath1151 . on note @xmath1152 o @xmath1153 dsigne le maximum des valeurs absolues des coefficients de @xmath1154 . on note aussi @xmath1155 @xmath1156 pour @xmath1157 , on note @xmath1158 et @xmath1159 la fonction @xmath1002 se calcule comme @xmath1160 elle est donc multiplicative en dimension @xmath817 : @xmath1161 pourvu que @xmath1162 . pour @xmath259 un nombre premier , on dfinit @xmath1163 on note @xmath1164 le plus grand entier tel que @xmath1165 . pour @xmath1166 tels que @xmath1167 , on a besoin de lordre moyen de la quantit suivante @xmath1168 [ th : browning ] soient @xmath35 , @xmath1169 . supposons que @xmath1170 . alors il existe un polynme @xmath1171 $ ] de degr @xmath817 tel que @xmath1172 o @xmath1173 et le coefficient du terme principal de @xmath146 est @xmath1174 avec @xmath1175 et pour @xmath1176 , @xmath1177 pour une utilisation ultrieure , nous voudrions en savoir un peu plus sur la constante @xmath1178 ainsi que sur la constante @xmath1179 . nous procdons comme dans @xcite 3 . on choisit une base @xmath1180 minimale pour @xmath1181 au sens suivant @xmath1182 et on dfinit les formes linaires binaires @xmath1183 via le changement de variables @xmath1184 comme @xmath1185 , les formes @xmath1183 nouvellement construites satisfont @xmath1186 soient @xmath1187 @xmath1188 les entiers tels que @xmath1189 soient des formes primitives . alors @xmath1190 puisque lon a suppos que les formes @xmath1154 sont primitives . on note @xmath1191 fixons un nombre premier @xmath259 et @xmath1192 . rappelons la dfinition de @xmath1193 et considrons le rseau @xmath1194 on a que @xmath1195 aprs ce changement de variables on rcrit le rseau @xmath1196 comme @xmath1197 en mme temps on dfinit un rseau @xmath1198 alors on obtient @xmath1199 do @xmath1200 on crit le produit @xmath1201 en une somme des fonctions multiplicatives en dimension @xmath817 : @xmath1202 o @xmath1203 lavantage de cette reprsentation est prsent dans le lemme suivant , qui sera utile pour la suite . [ le : convolutionrepresentation ] pour tout @xmath35 et @xmath1204 telle que @xmath1205 , on a @xmath1206 en particulier , on a @xmath1207 on dfinit une fonction arithmtique multiplicative @xmath1208 . rappelons la formule . un calcul donne @xmath1209 donc @xmath1210 on obtient que @xmath1211 en particulier @xmath1212 est _ petite _ dans le sens de ( 2.19 ) dans @xcite : il existe @xmath1213 petit tel que la srie @xmath1214 converge . cette proprit jouera un rle important dans le traitement des termes derreur . dans la suite on fixe nos formes @xmath1154 comme @xmath1215 et la rgion @xmath1216 le but est dobtenir la formule asymptotique pour la somme des points entiers do nt les coordonnes @xmath1217 sont premires entre elles . cela consiste en une application directe du thorme [ th : browning ] avec une inversion de mbius comme fait dans ( * ? ? ? * corollaire 1 ) pour certaines formes binaires de degr @xmath14 . malheureusement cela nest pas fait dans @xcite . nous suivons les techniques venant de @xcite pour dmontrer les formules asymptotiques . on dfinit pour @xmath1218 , @xmath1219 soient @xmath1220 comme prcdemment avec @xmath1221 . la sommation do nt la formule asymptotique cherche est @xmath1222 @xmath1223 o @xmath1224 avec @xmath1225 par une inversion de mbius , on a @xmath1226 on dfinit @xmath1227 , et on note @xmath1228 comme @xmath1229 la somme [ eq : sumofdivisorsprimitive ] scrit comme @xmath1230 on divise cette somme en deux parties , une pour les @xmath1231 petits et lautre pour les @xmath1231 grands . on applique le thorme [ th : browning ] @xmath1232 en notant que @xmath1233 et on obtient en notant @xmath1234 @xmath1235 en outre , on a une majoration ( @xcite , ( 2.5 ) ) @xmath1236 donc on peut majorer le terme derreur comme @xmath1237 @xmath1238 en reportant dans ( [ eq : mobiustransform ] ) , on obtient @xmath1239 on note pour @xmath1240 , @xmath1241 on calcule maintenant la constante , avec les notations et , @xmath1242 vrifions que les facteurs locaux @xmath1243 sont donns par . si @xmath1244 , on dfinit le rseau @xmath1245 alors on a @xmath1246 @xmath1247 si @xmath1248 , on a dans ce cas pour @xmath1249 et donc en remarquant que @xmath1250 on obtient @xmath1251 maintenant on est prt dduire la formule asymptotique pour la fonction @xmath1021 . on voit que , daprs @xmath1252 et @xmath1253 , @xmath1254 on fixe les trois formes linaires @xmath1255 et la rgion @xmath12560,1\mathclose]^2:\tau_2\leqslant\frac{x_2}{x_1}\leqslant\tau_1\right\}.\ ] ] alors @xmath1257 la quantit @xmath1258 tant nulle sil existe @xmath1259 tel que @xmath1260 . daprs , on a , en notant @xmath1261 , @xmath1262 le terme principal de la sommation est @xmath1263 o daprs , @xmath1264 grce notre choix des formes linaires , fixons un nombre premier @xmath259 , on a que pour @xmath1265 , @xmath1266 on calcule pour @xmath1267 , @xmath1268 de faon analogue on a @xmath1269 on en dduit les valeurs de @xmath1270 comme suit . @xmath1272 donc le facteur local se calcule , en rappelant que @xmath1273 , @xmath1274 donc @xmath1275 or on a aussi une majoration pour @xmath1258 ( @xcite , ( 3.1 ) ) : @xmath1276 qui dcoule des majorations standards pour le nombre de diviseurs et pour le dnombrement des points sur un rseau . soit @xmath1277 tel que @xmath1278 et @xmath1279 . comme prcdemment on dcompose la somme en deux parties @xmath1280 selon la taille de @xmath1281 . cela nous permet de contrler les termes derreur , compte - tenu de , @xmath1282 @xmath1283 @xmath1284 daprs le lemme [ le : convolutionrepresentation ] et la majoration , on a @xmath1285 do @xmath1286 on en conclut que peut se calculer comme @xmath1287 cela dmontre la formule [ po : asymptoticforpsi ] de la proposition [ po : problemofdivisor ] en remarquant que @xmath1288 tout dabord on traite la somme @xmath1289 comme @xmath1290 on obtient , daprs le thorme de fubini , @xmath1291 comme @xmath1292 lgalit ci - dessus scrit @xmath1293 finalement on arrive sommer @xmath1294 on dfinit @xmath1295 et on rappelle que @xmath1296 alors @xmath1297 il rsulte de que @xmath1298 il faut traiter le deuxime terme . daprs le thorme de fubini et en remplaant @xmath1299 par @xmath453 , @xmath1300 on obtient finalement que @xmath1301 je tiens remercier emmanuel peyre pour mavoir propos ce problme et pour des conseils tout au long de mon travail . rgis de la bretche , marc hindry mont donn des indications trs prcieuses . je les en remercie chaleureusement . des parties de ce travail ont t faites luniversit paris - diderot et beijing international center for mathematical research do nt latmosphre stimulante est sincrement apprci . lauteur est partiellement support par le projet anr gardio . victor v. batyrev , on the classification of smooth projective toric varieties . thoku math . 43 , no.4 , 569 - 585 ( 1991 ) . victor v. batyrev , yuri i. manin , sur le nombre des points rationnels de hauteur born des varits algbriques . 286 , no . 1 - 3 , 27 - 43 ( 1990 ) . victor v. batyrev , yuri tschinkel , rational points of bounded height on compactifications of anisotropic tori , intern . math . research notices , 12 , 591 - 635 , ( 1995 ) victor v. batyrev , yuri tschinkel , manin s conjecture for toric varieties . j. algebraic geom . 7 ( 1998 ) , no . 1 , 1553 timothy d. browning , the divisor problem for binary cubic forms . j. thor . nombres bordeaux 23 ( 2011 ) , no . 3 , 579602 . timothy d. browning , quantitative arithmetic of projective varieties . progress in mathematics 277 . birkhuser , basel . xi , 160 p. ( 2009 ) . rgis de la bretche , timothy d. browning , le problme des diviseurs pour des formes binaires de degr 4 . j. reine angew . math . 646 ( 2010 ) , 144 . rgis de la bretche , timothy d. browning , manin s conjecture for quartic del pezzo surfaces with a conic fibration . duke math . j. 160 ( 2011 ) , no . 1 , 169 . cassels , j.w.s . an introduction to the geometry of numbers . die grundlehren der mathematischen wissenschaften . berlin - gttingen - heidelberg : springer - verlag . viii , 344 pp . g. v. chudnovsky , on the method of thue - siegel . ann . of math . ( 2 ) 117 ( 1983 ) , no . 2 , 325382 . lejeune - dirichlet p .- sur une proprit des formes quadratiques dterminant positif . journal de mathmatiques pures et appliques . paris . 1 , ( 1856 ) 76 - 79 . william fulton , introduction to toric varieties . annals of mathematics studies . 131 . princeton , nj : princeton university press . xi , 157 p. ( 1993 ) . roger heath - brown , diophantine approximation with square - free numbers . z. 187 , 335 - 344 ( 1984 ) . zhizhong huang , distribution locale des points rationnels de hauteur borne sur une surface de del pezzo de degr 6 . apparatre dans int . j. number theory . khintchine , continued fractions . translated by peter wynn . p. noordhoff , ltd . , groningen 1963 iii+101 pp . l. kuipers , h. niederreiter , uniform distribution of sequences . pure and applied mathematics . wiley - interscience [ john wiley & sons ] , new york - london - sydney , 1974 . xiv+390 pp . serge lang , asymptotic approximations to quadratic irrationalities . _ * 87 * ( 1965 ) , 481 - 487 ; _ ibid . _ 488496 . david mckinnon , _ a conjecture on rational approximations to rational points _ , j. algebraic geom . * 16 * ( 2007 ) , 257 - 303 . david mckinnon , mike roth , _ seshadri constants , diophantine approximation , and roth s theorem for arbitrary varieties _ , invent . math . * 200 * ( 2 ) , ( 2015 ) 513 - 583 . s. pagelot , _ tude de la distribution asymptotique fine des points rationnels de hauteur borne _ , manuscrit non - publi . emmanuel peyre , hauteurs et mesures de tamagawa sur les varits de fano . duke math . j. 79 ( 1995 ) , no . 1 , 101218 . emmanuel peyre , points de hauteur borne , topologie adlique et mesures de tamagawa . nombres bordx . 15 , no . 1 , 319 - 349 ( 2003 ) . per salberger , tamagawa measures on universal torsors and points of bounded height on fano varieties . nombre et rpartition de points de hauteur borne . astrisque no . 251 ( 1998 ) , 91258 . pierre samuel , _ thorie algbrique des nombres . _ hermann , paris 1967 130 pp . grald tenenbaum , introduction la thorie analytique et probabiliste des nombres . cours spcialiss 1 . socit mathmatique de france , paris , 1995 . xv+457 pp . Abstract:

Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.

Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered . Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video . Paper: derived equivalences between finite dimensional algebras are known to be fundamental in representation theory and applications . unfortunately , still very few positive results are known about the structure of derived equivalences and about homological invariants . for instance , it is not known when ( a ) a derived equivalence between algebras @xmath0 and @xmath3 induces derived equivalences between certain centraliser subalgebras @xmath6 and @xmath7 , or in case of group algebras between subgroup algebras . it is also not known when ( b ) the existence of a derived equivalence implies that @xmath0 and @xmath3 share homological invariants such as global or dominant dimension . for known classes of derived equivalences , both questions are known to have dauntingly negative answers . the aim of this article is to identify large classes of algebras where both problems do have positive solutions . a starting point , and some hope , may be provided by the class of self - injective algebras , which have both global and dominant dimension infinite , except in the semisimple case . under some mild assumption , derived equivalences are known to preserve the property of being self - injective , hence also the values of these two homological dimensions . in full generality , derived equivalences between self - injective algebras @xmath0 and @xmath3 induce stable equivalences of morita type and thus there are equalities between global and also between dominant dimensions of @xmath0 and @xmath3 . this motivates considering algebras that are closely related to self - injective algebras and considering derived equivalences inducing stable equivalences of morita type , leading to the following more precise versions of ( a ) and ( b ) : the key concept to address both questions and to identify suitable and interesting classes of algebras is @xmath1-dominant dimension ( to be defined in [ defn : strong dominant dimension ] ) , where @xmath1 is the nakayama functor sending projective to injective modules over an algebra . concerning ( a ) , an assumption is needed to identify unique and non - zero associated self - injective centraliser subalgebras ( first used by martinez - villa @xcite ) of @xmath0 and @xmath3 , respectively , which then can be investigated for derived equivalence . in general , it may happen that an algebra @xmath0 having zero as associated self - injective algebra is derived equivalent to an algebra @xmath3 having a non - zero associated self - injective algebra ; see ( * ? ? ? * section 5 ) for an example . the condition that both algebras have faithful strongly projective - injective modules allows to identify non - trivial associated self - injective centraliser subalgebras ( lemma [ lem : two dominant dimensions coincide ] and definition [ defn : associatedselfinjectivealgebra ] ) , and it is strong enough to solve problem ( a ) : : _ let @xmath0 and @xmath3 be finite dimensional algebras of @xmath1-dominant dimension at least one , and let @xmath8 and @xmath9 be their associated self - injective centraliser subalgebras . if @xmath0 and @xmath3 are derived equivalent , then also @xmath2 and @xmath4 are derived equivalent . _ the proof is based on a stronger result ( theorem [ thm : restriction theorem ] ) , which shows that the given derived equivalence between @xmath0 and @xmath3 restricts to certain subcategories that are shown to determine the derived categories of @xmath2 and @xmath4 . the class of algebras of @xmath1-dominant dimension at least one contains all self - injective algebras , but also the morita algebras introduced in @xcite , which are characterised in ( theorem [ prop : characterise morita algebras ] ) as the algebras having @xmath1-dominant dimension at least two ; their @xmath1-dominant dimension coincides with the classical dominant dimension . morita algebras in turn contain gendo - symmetric algebras and hence several classes of algebras of interest in algebraic lie theory such as classical or quantised schur algebras and blocks of the bgg - category @xmath10 of semisimple complex lie algebras ; these algebras usually have finite global dimension , but are related to self - injective algebras by schur - weyl dualities . special cases of the derived restriction theorem state for instance : ( 1 ) two classical or quantised schur algebras @xmath11 ( with @xmath5 ) are derived equivalent only if the corresponding group algebras of symmetric groups or hecke algebras are so ( for the latter a derived equivalence classification is known by chuang and rouquier @xcite ) . + ( 2 ) auslander algebras of self - injective algebras of finite representation type are derived equivalent if and only if the self - injective algebras are so ( the latter derived equivalences are known by work of asashiba @xcite ) , and in this case the auslander algebras moreover are stably equivalent of morita type ( corollary [ cor : restriction theorem for auslander algebras ] ) . problem ( b ) does not , in general , have a positive answer for algebras of @xmath1-dominant dimension at least one ; only upper bounds for the differences in dimensions can be given ( which are valid in general , proposition [ prop : bound global dimension ] and theorem [ thm : bound the difference ] ) . to identify subclasses of algebras where problem ( b ) has a positive answer , two approaches are developed here : one approach identifies special derived equivalences , which do preserve both global and dominant dimensions : these are the ( iterated ) almost @xmath1-stable derived equivalences ( introduced in @xcite ) . these equivalences are known to induce stable equivalences of morita type . standard equivalences between self - injective algebras are of this form . the same is true for a larger class of algebras introduced here , the almost self - injective algebras , which include all self - injective algebras and also some algebras of finite global dimension , for instance schur algebras of finite representation type : the second approach concentrates on directly identifying global and dominant dimension inside some derived category ; in the case of dominant dimension , the associated self - injective centraliser subalgebra occurring in the derived restriction theorem is used . this approach works ( under the assumption of having dominant dimension at least one ) for all split algebras ( e.g. , algebras over an algebraically closed field ) having an anti - automorphism ( for instance , a duality ) preserving simples : dualities , i.e. involutory anti - automorphisms fixing simples , exist for instance for all cellular algebras . the second invariance theorem covers in particular classical and quantised schur algebras and even their blocks . in fact , the invariance property is strong enough ( theorems [ thm : global dimension of blocks of schur algebras ] and [ thm : dominant dimension of blocks of schur algebras ] ) to determine these dimensions by explicit combinatorial formulae in terms of weights and ( quantum ) characteristics , for all blocks of such schur algebras , using the derived equivalences constructed by chuang and rouquier . the main results of this article are motivated by various results in the literature , which are extended and applied here : the idea to use schur - weyl dualities and schur functors to compare homological data of self - injective algebras such as group algebras of symmetric groups and of their schur algebras ( quasi - hereditary covers ) , of finite global dimension , has been developed in @xcite . there it has been demonstrated that dominant dimension is not only crucial for existence of schur - weyl duality , @xcite , but also for the quality of the schur functor in preserving homological data , although typically on one side of schur - weyl duality there is an algebra of infinite global and dominant dimension and on the other side there is an algebra with finite such dimensions . these are derived equivalent only in degenerate ( semisimple ) cases . the same approach has been demonstrated to work for hochschild cohomology in @xcite , where also a first instance of the derived restriction theorem has appeared . the concept of ( iterated ) almost @xmath1-stable derived equivalence and its useful properties have been developed in @xcite , where the focus has been on the resulting stable equivalences of morita type ( which imply invariance of global and dominant dimension ) . chuang and rouquier s derived equivalence classification of blocks of symmetric groups and of some related algebras provides an important supply of examples . it turns out , however , that already these equivalences , more precisely those between quantised schur algebras , are not always iterated @xmath1-stable , which forces us to use the second approach to derived invariants , using anti - automorphisms fixing simples , in this case . after recalling two major homological invariants of algebras , global dimension and dominant dimension , a new variation of dominant dimension , @xmath1-dominant dimension , is introduced that will turn out to provide a crucial assumption in the main results . in the second subsection , the two main classes of algebras considered here will be discussed and related to @xmath1-dominant dimension ; these are the morita algebras , which will get characterised in terms of @xmath1-dominant dimension , and the new class of almost self - injective algebras . throughout , @xmath12 is an arbitrary field of any characteristic . algebras are _ finite dimensional _ @xmath12-vector spaces and , unless stated otherwise , modules are finitely generated left modules . when @xmath0 is an algebra , @xmath13 denotes the opposite algebra of @xmath0 , and @xmath14 is the enveloping algebra @xmath15 . let @xmath16 ( respectively @xmath17 ) be the category of all ( respectively all finitely generated ) left @xmath0-modules , and @xmath18 ( respectively @xmath19 ) the full subcategory of @xmath17 whose objects are the projective ( respectively injective ) left @xmath0-modules . let @xmath20 be the usual @xmath12-duality functor @xmath21 and @xmath22 the nakayama functor . we follow the conventions from @xcite . let @xmath23 be an additive category . an object @xmath24 in @xmath23 is called _ strongly indecomposable _ if @xmath25 is a local ring . an object @xmath26 in @xmath23 is called _ basic _ if @xmath26 is a direct sum of strongly indecomposable objects of multiplicity one each . for an object @xmath27 in @xmath23 , we write @xmath28 for the full subcategory of @xmath23 consisting of all direct summands of finite direct sum of copies of @xmath27 . by @xmath29 or @xmath30 we denote the composition of morphisms @xmath31 and @xmath32 in @xmath23 . a morphism @xmath33 is said to be _ radical _ in @xmath23 , if for morphisms @xmath34 and @xmath35 , the composition @xmath36 never is an isomorphism . in contrast to the composition rule for morphisms , we write @xmath37 for the composition of two functors @xmath38 and @xmath39 between additive categories . given a finite dimensional @xmath12-algebra @xmath0 , there are many homological invariants around to measure the complexity of @xmath0 from different points of view , and global dimension is the most widely used one . by definition , the global dimension of @xmath0 , denoted by @xmath40 , is the smallest number @xmath41 or @xmath42 such that @xmath43 for any @xmath44 and all @xmath45 . the following ( well - known ) characterisation can be found for instance in ( * ? ? ? * corollary 3.8 ) . [ lem : characterise global dimension ] let @xmath0 be a @xmath12-algebra . if @xmath46 , then @xmath40 is the largest number @xmath41 such that @xmath47 . dominant dimension was introduced by nakayama , and developed later mainly by morita and tachikawa , see @xcite for more information , and @xcite for a recent development partly motivating our aims and results . [ defn : dominant dimension ] let @xmath0 be a @xmath12-algebra . the _ dominant dimension _ of @xmath0 , denoted by @xmath48 , is defined to be the largest number @xmath49 ( or @xmath42 ) such that in a minimal injective resolution @xmath50 of the left regular @xmath0-module , @xmath51 is projective for all @xmath52 ( or @xmath42 ) . thus , @xmath53 not being projective , that is @xmath54 , is equivalent to @xmath0 not having a faithful projective - injective module . the module @xmath55 is projective and injective if and only if so is @xmath56 in @xmath57 . it follows that @xmath58 and thus @xmath48 can be defined alternatively via right @xmath0-modules . if @xmath59 , then there exists a unique ( up to isomorphism ) minimal faithful right @xmath0-module ( and also a unique up to isomorphism minimal faithful left @xmath0-module ) . it must be projective and injective , hence of the form @xmath60 for some idempotent @xmath61 in @xmath0 . if @xmath62 , then @xmath60 is a faithful balanced bimodule , i.e. , there is a double centralizer property , namely @xmath63 canonically . algebras of infinite dominant dimension are conjectured to be self - injective ( this is the celebrated _ nakayama conjecture _ ) , see @xcite . the following characterisation of dominant dimension is due to mller . [ prop : muller characterisation ] let @xmath0 be a @xmath12-algebra of dominant dimension at least @xmath64 . let @xmath60 be a minimal faithful right @xmath0-module and @xmath65 be an integer . then @xmath66 if and only if @xmath67 for @xmath68 . of particular interest later on will be certain derived equivalences , ( iterated ) almost @xmath1-stable derived equivalences , defined in @xcite . here , a certain subclass of both projective and injective ( projective - injective for short ) modules is crucial . this motivates the following variation of dominant dimension , which is crucial for our main results . [ defn : strong projective injective modules ] let @xmath0 be a @xmath12-algebra and @xmath69 be the nakayama functor . a projective @xmath0-module @xmath70 is said to be _ strongly projective - injective _ if @xmath71 is projective for all @xmath72 . by @xmath73 we denote the full subcategory of @xmath18 consisting of strongly projective - injective @xmath0-modules . in @xcite , strongly projective - injective modules are called @xmath1-stably projective ; since this may be misunderstood as implying @xmath1-stable , we use a different terminology here . strongly projective - injective modules are projective and injective , which justifies their name . an easy proof goes as follows , see also ( * ? ? ? * lemma 2.3 ) . first note that @xmath70 is strongly projective - injective if and only if so is each of its direct summands . thus we may assume that @xmath70 is indecomposable . since the nakayama functor @xmath74 sends indecomposable projective modules to indecomposable injective modules , it follows that @xmath75 are indecomposable projective - injective for all @xmath72 . but there are only finitely many indecomposable objects in @xmath18 , so there must exist @xmath76 such that @xmath77 . using again that @xmath78 is an equivalence , we deduce that @xmath79 . in particular , @xmath70 is both projective and injective . [ defn : strong dominant dimension ] let @xmath0 be a @xmath12-algebra . @xmath1-dominant dimension _ of @xmath0 , denoted by @xmath80 , is defined to be the largest number @xmath49 ( or @xmath42 ) such that in a minimal injective resolution @xmath50 of the left regular @xmath0-module , @xmath51 is strongly projective - injective for all @xmath52 ( or @xmath42 ) . by definition , @xmath81 , but in general there is no equality . here is an example illustrating the difference between these two dimensions . let @xmath0 be the path algebra @xmath82 of the quiver @xmath83 . then @xmath84 is projective - injective , but not strongly projective - injective , since @xmath85 and @xmath86 is not projective . as a result , @xmath87 , while @xmath88 . in our context , @xmath1-dominant dimension is important , since it allows to identify particular self - injective centraliser subalgebras : [ lem : two dominant dimensions coincide ] let @xmath0 be a @xmath12-algebra . if @xmath89 , then all projective - injective @xmath0-modules are strongly projective - injective , and thus @xmath90 . in this case , endomorphism rings of minimal faithful left @xmath0-modules are self - injective . suppose @xmath89 . then , a minimal faithful left @xmath0-module is of the form @xmath91 , and strongly projective - injective . we will use its endomorphism ring @xmath6 as ` the largest self - injective centraliser subalgebra ' . since @xmath89 , the injective envelope @xmath92 of @xmath93 is strongly projective - injective . let @xmath70 be an indecomposable projective - injective @xmath0-module . the composition is a split monomorphism . thus @xmath70 is a direct summand of @xmath92 , and in particular strongly projective - injective . consequently , all projective - injective @xmath0-modules are strongly projective - injective . hence the two dominant dimensions coincide . let @xmath91 be a minimal faithful left @xmath0-module . by assumption , it is strongly projective - injective . hence @xmath94 belongs to @xmath95 , and in particular @xmath96 , that is , @xmath6 is self - injective . the endomorphism ring of a strongly projective - injective @xmath0-module in general may not be self - injective , even when assuming @xmath89 . for instance , let @xmath0 be the self - injective nakayama algebra with cyclic quiver , three simple modules and @xmath97 . then each indecomposable projective module is injective as well , and even strongly projective - injective , but the endomorphism ring of a sum of two non - isomorphic indecomposable projective modules never is self - injective . the proof of lemma [ lem : two dominant dimensions coincide ] works not only for @xmath91 , but also for any direct sum of copies of @xmath91 . [ defn : associatedselfinjectivealgebra ] let @xmath0 be a @xmath12-algebra with @xmath89 and let @xmath91 be a minimal faithful left @xmath0-module . then the centraliser algebra @xmath6 is called the _ associated self - injective algebra of @xmath0_. these associated self - injective subalgebras have been introduced and strongly used before in work of martinez - villa @xcite reducing validity of the auslander - reiten conjecture on stable equivalences preserving the number of non - projective simple modules to the case of self - injective algebras . there , the setup is more general and the associated self - injective algebras have been allowed to be zero , which does not make sense in our situation as we need a strong connection between the given algebra and its associated self - injective subalgebra . the term ` associated self - injective algebra ' first occurred in @xcite . the term ` morita algebras ' ( not related to morita rings occurring in morita contexts ) was coined by kerner and yamagata in @xcite , when they investigated algebras first studied by morita @xcite as endomorphism rings of generators over self - injective algebras . the subclass of morita algebras consisting of endomorphism rings of generators over symmetric algebras , called gendo - symmetric algebras , was introduced and studied independently in @xcite . [ def : morita algebras ] a @xmath12-algebra @xmath0 is called a _ morita algebra _ if @xmath0 is isomorphic to for some self - injective algebra @xmath98 and some module @xmath99 . @xmath0 is called _ gendo - symmetric _ if in addition @xmath98 is symmetric . gendo - symmetric algebras form a large class of algebras , cutting across traditional boundaries such as finite or infinite global dimension . examples of finite global dimension include classical and quantised schur algebras @xmath11 ( with @xmath5 ) , blocks of the bernstein - gelfand - gelfand category @xmath10 and many other algebras occurring in algebraic lie theory and elsewhere . examples of infinite global dimension include symmetric algebras , for instance group algebras and hecke algebras . morita algebras include in addition self - injective , and in particular frobenius algebras , and their auslander algebras . morita algebras have been characterised in several ways , see @xcite . for our purposes , a new characterisation is needed in terms of @xmath1-dominant dimension ( section [ subsec : global dimension and dominant dimension ] ) : [ prop : characterise morita algebras ] let @xmath0 be a @xmath12-algebra . then @xmath100 if and only if @xmath0 is a morita algebra . suppose @xmath100 . then by lemma [ lem : two dominant dimensions coincide ] , the minimal faithful @xmath0-module @xmath91 is ( strongly ) projective - injective and its endomorphism ring @xmath6 is self - injective . moreover , @xmath0 has dominant dimension at least two , which implies a double centraliser property on @xmath91 , between @xmath0 and @xmath6 . therefore , @xmath0 is a morita algebra . conversely , if @xmath0 is a morita algebra , then @xmath0 is isomorphic to @xmath101 for some self - injective algebra @xmath98 and a generator @xmath27 in @xmath102 . let @xmath103 be the direct sum of all pairwise non - isomorphic indecomposable projective @xmath98-modules . by definition , @xmath103 is a direct summand of @xmath27 and @xmath104 . moreover , as left @xmath98-modules and there are isomorphisms of @xmath0-modules @xmath105 here , the isomorphism @xmath106 follows from @xmath107 . the isomorphism @xmath108 uses and the isomorphism @xmath109 follows from tensor - hom adjointness . @xmath110 uses @xmath111 . this proves the claim . now we construct an injective presentation of the left regular @xmath0-module @xmath112 ( or @xmath101 ) as follows : take an injective presentation @xmath113 of @xmath27 and apply @xmath114 to obtain the exact sequence @xmath115 of left note that both @xmath84 and @xmath116 are projective @xmath98-modules and thus belong to @xmath117 . therefore , @xmath118 for @xmath119 , and so @xmath100 . let @xmath0 be a morita algebra . then @xmath120 . this follows immediately from lemma [ lem : two dominant dimensions coincide ] and proposition [ prop : characterise morita algebras ] . gendo - symmetric algebras appeared first in @xcite , see @xcite for further information . in our context , there is the following characterisation : [ prop : properties on gendo - symmetric algebras ] let @xmath0 be a @xmath12-algebra . then @xmath0 is gendo - symmetric if and only if @xmath121 as @xmath0-bimodules . if @xmath0 is gendo - symmetric , then @xmath122 . the first claim follows from ( * ? ? ? * theorem 3.2 ) and the second one from ( * ? ? ? * proposition 3.3 ) . alternatively , the characterisation of @xmath48 also follows from proposition [ prop : muller characterisation ] combined with the following claim : since @xmath0 is a gendo - symmetric algebra , dualising both sides of the isomorphism @xmath123 yields an isomorphism @xmath124 as @xmath0-bimodules . thus @xmath125 is isomorphic to @xmath91 , and in particular it is projective - injective . now , for a minimal injective resolution @xmath126 of the left regular @xmath0-module , the first @xmath48-terms are projective - injective , hence belong to @xmath127 . applying @xmath128 to the sequence @xmath129 , and comparing the cohomologies of @xmath130 and @xmath131 , proves the claim . the second class of algebras we are going to study generalises self - injective algebras . an algebra @xmath0 is called an _ almost self - injective algebra _ , if @xmath89 and there is at most one indecomposable projective @xmath0-module that is not injective . among the examples are schur algebras of finite representation type , which have finite global dimension and which are morita algebras . schur algebras , and thus morita algebras , in general are not almost self - injective . schur algebras of finite representation type are examples of gendo - brauer tree algebras described and classified in @xcite . these algebras are representation - finite gendo - symmetric and in addition biserial ; the corresponding symmetric algebras are brauer tree algebras . conversely , almost self - injective algebras need not be morita algebras as the following example illustrates . let @xmath0 be the @xmath12-algebra given by the quiver @xmath132^\delta & 1 \ar@/^/[l]^\alpha \ar@/^/[r]^\beta & 3 \ar@/^/[l]^\theta}\ ] ] and relations @xmath133 . the loewy series of the indecomposable projective left @xmath0-modules are @xmath134 then both @xmath116 and @xmath135 are strongly projective - injective , and @xmath136 . thus @xmath0 is an almost self - injective algebra , but not a morita algebra . after recalling fundamental facts of derived morita theory , basic properties of standard equivalences will be shown and then almost @xmath1-stable derived equivalences will be explained , thus providing crucial tools for proofs later on . let @xmath23 be an additive category . a complex @xmath137 over @xmath138 is a sequence of morphisms @xmath139 in @xmath23 of the form @xmath140 with @xmath141 for all @xmath142 . we call @xmath137 a _ radical _ complex if all @xmath139 are radical morphisms . we denote by @xmath143 ( respectively @xmath144 ) the category of complexes ( respectively bounded complexes ) over @xmath138 , and by @xmath145 ( respectively @xmath146 ) the corresponding homotopy category . @xmath147 ( respectively @xmath148 ) is the derived category of complexes ( respectively bounded complexes ) over @xmath138 when @xmath138 is abelian . homotopy categories and derived categories are prominent examples of _ triangulated categories_. for an algebra @xmath0 , we write @xmath149 , @xmath150 and @xmath151 for @xmath152 , @xmath153 and @xmath154 respectively , where @xmath155 stands for @xmath156 or @xmath157 . [ lem : morphisms in derived categories ] let @xmath0 be an algebra . then : @xmath106 every complex of @xmath0-modules is isomorphic to a radical complex in the homotopy category @xmath158 . @xmath108 two radical complexes are isomorphic in the homotopy category @xmath158 if and only if so they are in @xmath159 . @xmath109 for two complexes @xmath137 and @xmath160 , if there exists an integer @xmath161 such that @xmath137 has no cohomology in degrees larger than @xmath161 ( i.e. , @xmath162 for @xmath163 ) , and @xmath160 has no cohomology in degrees smaller than @xmath161 ( i.e. , @xmath164 for @xmath165 ) , then @xmath166 + in particular , for any complex @xmath167 of @xmath0-modules , @xmath168)$ ] is isomorphic to its @xmath169-th cohomology @xmath170 for all @xmath169 . the first two statements are taken from @xcite ; the remaining statements can be shown by using truncations and cartan - eilenberg resolutions of complexes . the tensor product of two complexes @xmath137 and @xmath160 in @xmath171 is defined to be the total complex of the double complex with its @xmath172-term @xmath173 , and their tensor product in @xmath174 is the tensor product of their projective resolutions in @xmath171 @xcite . let @xmath137 be a complex over @xmath138 of the form @xmath175 . then the _ brutal truncations _ of @xmath137 are defined by cutting off the left or right hand part of the complex : @xmath176 and @xmath177 . there is an exact sequence of complexes @xmath178 , which also defines a triangle . _ derived equivalences _ are by definition equivalences of derived categories that preserve the triangulated structures , that is shift and triangles . two algebras _ @xmath0 and @xmath3 are derived equivalent _ if there is a derived equivalence between their derived categories . despite their importance , derived equivalences are still rather unknown and even basic questions are still open . the equivalence relation between algebras defined by derived equivalence does , however , admit a very satisfactory theory , known as _ morita theory for derived categories _ , due to rickard and ( more generally for dg algebras ) to keller . [ thm : morita theory for derived category ] let @xmath0 and @xmath3 be two @xmath12-algebras . the following statements are equivalent . * @xmath179 and @xmath180 are equivalent as triangulated categories . * @xmath181 and @xmath182 are equivalent as triangulated categories . * @xmath183 and @xmath184 are equivalent as triangulated categories . * @xmath185 and @xmath186 are equivalent as triangulated categories . * there exists a complex @xmath187 such that @xmath188 and * * @xmath189)=0 $ ] unless @xmath190 ; * * @xmath191 generates @xmath185 as triangulated category . the complex @xmath192 in ( 5 ) is called a _ tilting complex_. for any derived equivalence from @xmath179 to @xmath180 , the image of @xmath0 in @xmath180 is a tilting complex , and so is the preimage of @xmath3 in @xmath179 . it is not known whether the equivalences in ( 1)-(4 ) determine each other uniquely ( see ( * ? ? ? * section 7 ) ) . to fix the ambiguity , rickard @xcite associated to each derived equivalence a _ standard derived equivalence_. a complex @xmath193 is called a _ two - sided tilting complex _ if and only if @xmath194 for some complex @xmath195 . the complex @xmath196 is called an _ inverse _ of @xmath197 . the functor @xmath198 ( respectively , @xmath199 ) is a triangle equivalence with @xmath200 ( respectively , @xmath201 ) as a quasi - inverse . such a derived equivalence is called a _ standard derived equivalence_. it has been proved in @xcite that each derived equivalence @xmath202 induces a derived equivalence @xmath203 from @xmath204 to @xmath205 , and the image @xmath197 of @xmath206 under @xmath203 is a two - sided tilting complex such that @xmath207 for all @xmath208 . it is not known whether @xmath209 and @xmath210 agree on morphisms . two - sided tilting complexes can be used to provide further derived equivalences . let @xmath197 be a two - sided tilting complex in @xmath211 with an inverse @xmath196 . then , for each algebra @xmath212 , the functor @xmath213 is a triangle equivalence with @xmath200 as a quasi - inverse , and the functor @xmath214 defines a derived equivalence with @xmath215 as a quasi - inverse , see @xcite for more details . here are some properties of the standard derived equivalence @xmath216 , to be used later on . [ lem : standard derived equivalence ] let @xmath0 and @xmath3 be derived equivalent @xmath12-algebras . let @xmath216 be a standard derived equivalence from @xmath174 to @xmath217 defined by a two - sided tilting complex @xmath197 in @xmath218 as defined above in ( [ eqn : two sided standard derived equivalence ] ) . then for any complexes @xmath137 and @xmath160 in @xmath174 , there are isomorphisms in @xmath217 * @xmath219 , @xmath220 ; * @xmath221 ; * @xmath222 ; * @xmath223 . \(1 ) follows from the isomorphism @xmath224 and ( 2 ) follows from ( * ? ? ? * proposition 5.2 ) . to show ( 3 ) and ( 4 ) , note that the derived functor @xmath225 from @xmath226 to @xmath227 is right adjoint to the derived functor @xmath210 ( see @xcite ) . thus it is naturally isomorphic to the derived functor @xmath200 . similarly , the two derived functors @xmath228 and @xmath210 are naturally isomorphic . ( 3 ) then follows by a series of isomorphisms in @xmath229 : @xmath230 here the isomorphisms marked by @xmath231 follow by tensor - hom adjointness , and the isomorphism marked by @xmath232 follows from @xmath233 . to prove ( 4 ) , observe that @xmath234 in @xmath235 . thus by ( 1 ) and ( 3 ) @xmath236 in @xmath217 . let @xmath237 be a triangulated category , and let @xmath238 , i=1 , 2 $ ] be triangles in @xmath237 . if one of the following conditions is satisfied @xmath106 @xmath239)$ ] for @xmath240 ; @xmath108 @xmath241 , z)$ ] for @xmath240 , then @xmath242 and @xmath243 are isomorphic . [ lemma - isomorphic - triangles ] assume that condition ( 1 ) is satisfied . applying @xmath244 to @xmath245 ( @xmath240 ) yields isomorphisms @xmath246 . this means that each morphism factorises uniquely through @xmath247 . in particular , @xmath248 and @xmath249 for some . it follows that @xmath250 and @xmath251 , and thus by uniqueness , @xmath252 . hence @xmath253 is an isomorphism , and the commutative diagram @xmath254^{f_1}\ar[d]_{h } & z\ar@{=}[d]\\ y\ar[r]^{f_2 } & z } \ ] ] extends to an isomorphism between @xmath242 and @xmath243 . the proof is similar when assuming ( 2 ) . derived equivalences , by definition , preserve all triangles , especially the following type . let @xmath255 be an idempotent in the @xmath12-algebra @xmath0 . there are canonical triangles associated to @xmath61 in @xmath227 : @xmath256 \\ \mathbf{(ct2 ) } \ , \ , \ , \eta_e^a & : \quad a { \stackrel{\rho_e}{{\longrightarrow } } } { { \rm\bf r}{\rm hom}}_{eae}(ea , ea ) { \longrightarrow}v_a(e ) { \longrightarrow}a[1 ] \end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath257 is induced by the multiplication map @xmath258 , and @xmath259 is induced by the canonical morphism @xmath260 . the triangle @xmath261 plays a crucial role in the analysis of recollements of derived categories @xcite . the following result implies that the property of being a canonical triangle is preserved under certain derived equivalences . [ lem : derived - equivalence - preserves - canonical - triangle ] let @xmath0 and @xmath3 be derived equivalent @xmath12-algebras , and @xmath262 a two - sided tilting complex with inverse @xmath263 . let @xmath61 and @xmath264 be idempotents in @xmath0 and @xmath3 respectively . assume that the standard derived equivalence @xmath265 restricts to a triangle equivalence @xmath266 . then @xmath267 and @xmath268 as triangles in @xmath229 . since @xmath269 is an equivalence of additive categories with a quasi - inverse @xmath270 , it follows that @xmath271 is an equivalence of triangulated categories with a quasi - inverse @xmath272 . similarly , the derived functor @xmath273 defines an equivalence from @xmath274 to @xmath275 with a quasi - inverse @xmath276 . note that @xmath277 and ( see @xcite ) . @xmath278 _ proof of claim . _ by assumption , @xmath279 belongs to @xmath280 . similarly , hence ( a ) . there are the following isomorphisms @xmath281 it follows that @xmath282 . by symmetry , also @xmath283 , hence ( b ) . to prove the first statement in ( c ) , consider the isomorphisms @xmath284 which use @xmath271 being an equivalence with quasi - inverse @xmath272 and @xmath285 . the second statement in ( c ) follows similarly . now , the isomorphisms ( the second one using ( a ) and ( c ) ) @xmath286 combined with lemma [ lem : standard derived equivalence ] ( 1 ) yield that @xmath287 is a triangle of the following form @xmath288\ ] ] in @xmath217 , where @xmath289 . so , the triangles @xmath290 and @xmath291 have at least two terms in common . to identify them as triangles , note that @xmath292 and since @xmath293 belongs to @xmath294 by ( b ) . then @xmath295)=0= { { \rm hom } } _ { { \mathscr{d}({{b^{\mathrm{e}}{\sf \mbox{-}mod}}})}}(bf{\otimes^{\rm\bf l}}_{fbf}fb , u_b(f)'[i ] ) , \forall i\in \mathbb{z}.\ ] ] here , the vanishing follows by adjointness . thus @xmath290 and @xmath291 are isomorphic triangles in @xmath217 by lemma [ lemma - isomorphic - triangles ] . so , @xmath290 is as claimed . it remains to check the claim about @xmath296 . the canonical triangle @xmath297 is isomorphic to @xmath298 . _ proof of claim . _ applying @xmath299 to @xmath261 results in a triangle @xmath300,\ ] ] and @xmath301 by adjointness . let @xmath302 . by definition , @xmath303 . using adjointness again , this implies @xmath304 , that is , @xmath305 . similarly , @xmath306 . it follows that @xmath307 , { { \rm\bf r}{\rm hom}}_{eae}(ea , ea))=0={{\rm hom } } _ { { \mathscr{d}({{a^{\rm e}{\sf \mbox{-}mod}}})}}(v_a(e)[i ] , { { \rm\bf r}{\rm hom}}_{eae}(ea , ea))\ ] ] for all @xmath142 . by lemma [ lemma - isomorphic - triangles ] , the triangles @xmath308 and @xmath297 are isomorphic , which proves the claim . by the first part of the proof , @xmath267 . applying lemma [ lem : standard derived equivalence ] ( 3 ) shows that @xmath309 . derived equivalences in general fail to preserve homological invariants such as global or dominant dimension . in this respect , stable equivalences of morita type behave much better . unfortunately , derived equivalences between algebras that are not self - injective , in general do not induce stable equivalences . the problem of finding derived equivalences , which do induce stable equivalences of morita type , has been addressed in @xcite by introducing a new class of derived equivalences , called _ almost @xmath1-stable derived equivalences _ , and relating them with stable equivalences . as a crucial feature , these derived equivalences preserve many homological invariants . let @xmath310 be a derived equivalence between two @xmath12-algebras @xmath0 and @xmath3 . we call @xmath209 an _ almost @xmath1-stable derived equivalence _ if the following conditions are satisfied . @xmath106 the radical tilting complex @xmath311 in @xmath186 has nonzero terms only in positive degrees , that is , @xmath312 for all @xmath313 ; the radical tilting complex @xmath314 in @xmath185 has nonzero terms only in negative degrees , that is , @xmath315 for all @xmath72 . @xmath108 @xmath316 and @xmath317 . note that we may assume without loss of generality that the tilting complex @xmath318 is radical by lemma [ lem : morphisms in derived categories ] . the two conditions for @xmath192 are equivalent to those for @xmath319 @xcite . to generalise this type of derived equivalence , but to keep many interesting properties , the following _ iterated almost @xmath1-stable derived equivalences _ have been introduced . let @xmath310 be a derived equivalence between two @xmath12-algebras @xmath0 and @xmath3 . we call @xmath209 an _ iterated almost @xmath1-stable derived equivalence _ , if there exists a sequence of derived equivalences @xmath320 of @xmath12-algebras @xmath321 @xmath322 for some @xmath323 with @xmath324 and @xmath325 such that each @xmath326 or @xmath327 is an almost @xmath1-stable derived equivalence and @xmath328 . in section [ sec : derived equivalences for morita algebras ] we will see that all derived equivalences between certain classes of algebras are iterated almost @xmath1-stable derived equivalences . this will make full use of the characterisations developed in @xcite . the crucial property in our context is : [ prop : almost nu - stable preserve dimensions ] let @xmath310 be an iterated almost @xmath1-stable derived equivalences between @xmath12-algebras . then @xmath329 and @xmath330 . the derived restriction theorem , to be proved in this section , states that derived equivalences between two algebras restrict to derived equivalences between their associated self - injective centraliser subalgebras , provided the two given algebras have @xmath1-dominant dimension at least one . a subcategory of the bounded homotopy category of projective modules will be defined and shown to be invariant under derived equivalence , under the assumption on @xmath1-dominant dimension . this will be the key ingredient in the proof of the derived restriction theorem . recall that for an algebra @xmath0 with @xmath89 and minimal faithful left module @xmath91 , the algebra @xmath331 is called the _ associated self - injective algebra of @xmath0_. then the category @xmath73 is additively generated by @xmath91 . that @xmath98 is self - injective has been shown in the proof of lemma [ lem : two dominant dimensions coincide ] . suppose now that @xmath0 and @xmath3 are derived equivalent @xmath12-algebras . like dominant dimension , @xmath1-dominant dimension is not a derived invariant . in particular , @xmath89 and @xmath332 may happen , and there may be no reasonable way to define a non - zero associated self - injective algebra for @xmath3 in this case . an example of such a situation has been given , for different reasons , in ( * ? ? ? * section 5 ) . therefore , it seems difficult to deduce any connection between the associated self - injective algebras of @xmath0 and @xmath3 in general without assuming both algebras have @xmath1-dominant dimension at least one . if we , however , assume that both @xmath0 and @xmath3 have @xmath1-dominant dimension at least @xmath333 , then theorem [ thm : restriction theorem ] below shows that any derived equivalence between @xmath0 and @xmath3 restricts to a derived equivalence between their associated self - injective algebras . the main tool for showing is the following subcategory of the homotopy category . [ defn : nu - stable complex ] let @xmath0 be a @xmath12-algebra and @xmath74 be the nakayama functor . define @xmath334 note that for @xmath335 , the complex @xmath336 is defined componentwise . when @xmath0 has arbitrary @xmath1-dominant dimension , a complex in @xmath337 need not be isomorphic in @xmath338 to a complex in @xmath339 ; this is illustrated by an example below . however : [ prop : nu - stable complexes ] let @xmath0 be a @xmath12-algebra with @xmath89 . then @xmath339 is the smallest triangulated full subcategory of @xmath185 that contains @xmath337 and is closed under taking direct summands . in particular , every complex in @xmath337 is isomorphic in @xmath185 to a complex in the category @xmath339 . let @xmath340 be the smallest triangulated full subcategory of @xmath185 which contains @xmath337 and is closed under taking direct summands . let @xmath103 be a basic additive generator of @xmath73 . then @xmath341 is isomorphic to @xmath103 in @xmath342 , because @xmath341 is again basic and strongly projective - injective and has the same number of indecomposable direct summands as @xmath103 . therefore @xmath103 belongs to @xmath337 . since @xmath339 is the smallest triangulated full subcategory of @xmath185 which contains @xmath103 and is closed under taking direct summands , it follows that @xmath343 . to finish the proof , we need to show @xmath344 , that is , every radical complex in @xmath337 is isomorphic in @xmath185 to a complex in @xmath339 . without loss of generality , we assume that @xmath345 . let @xmath346 . so the complex @xmath347 is of the form @xmath348 we will prove by induction on @xmath161 that @xmath347 is isomorphic in @xmath185 to a complex in @xmath339 . if @xmath190 , then @xmath349 in @xmath183 implies that @xmath350 in @xmath342 , and so @xmath351 . in general , we first prove : @xmath352 is strongly projective - injective . since @xmath347 is a radical complex in @xmath185 and @xmath78 is an equivalence , it follows that @xmath336 is a radical complex in @xmath353 . let @xmath354 be a quasi - isomorphism . then @xmath336 is an injective resolution of @xmath347 . by the construction of cartan - eilenberg injective resolutions @xmath347 admits an injective resolution @xmath355 with the properties : @xmath355 is quasi - isomorphic to @xmath347 , and @xmath356 for @xmath313 and @xmath53 is the injective envelope of @xmath352 . by the uniqueness of injective resolutions up to homotopy , the radical complex @xmath336 and the complex @xmath355 are isomorphic in @xmath357 , and therefore @xmath358 is a direct summand of @xmath53 by lemma [ lem : morphisms in derived categories ] . since @xmath89 , the injective envelope @xmath53 of @xmath352 is strongly projective - injective . it follows that @xmath358 and hence @xmath352 are strongly projective - injective as well . let @xmath359 be the mapping cone of @xmath360 , a complex of the form @xmath361}{{\longrightarrow } } } p^1\oplus \nu_{_a}(p^0){\longrightarrow}\cdots { \longrightarrow}\nu_{_a}(p^n){\longrightarrow}0\ ] ] where @xmath362 is placed in degree @xmath363 . since @xmath360 is a quasi - isomorphism , it follows that @xmath359 is an acyclic complex , and thus the morphism @xmath364 : p^0\to p^1\oplus \nu_{_a}(p^0)$ ] splits in @xmath342 because @xmath352 is injective . let @xmath365 and @xmath366 be morphisms in @xmath342 such that @xmath367 . then @xmath368 is invertible in @xmath369 by the assumption that @xmath370 is a radical morphism . as a result , @xmath371 is a split monomorphism , and even an isomorphism as @xmath352 and @xmath358 have the same number of indecomposable direct summands . now , let @xmath372 be the brutal truncation of @xmath347 and let @xmath373 be the corresponding truncation of the chain morphism @xmath360 . starting from the triangle , the following commutative diagram in @xmath374 gives a morphism of triangles in @xmath374 @xmath375\ar[r]\ar[d]^{f^0[-1 ] } & { p^{\bullet}}_{{\geqslant}1}\ar[r]\ar[d]^{{f^{\bullet}}_{{\geqslant}1 } } & { p^{\bullet}}\ar[r]\ar[d]^{{f^{\bullet } } } & p^0\ar[d]^{f^0}\\ \nu_{_a}(p^0)[-1]\ar[r ] & \nu_{_a}({p^{\bullet}}_{{\geqslant}1 } ) \ar[r ] & \nu_{_a}({p^{\bullet}})\ar[r ] & \nu_{_a}(p^0 ) . } \ ] ] since @xmath360 is a quasi - isomorphism ( by assumption ) and so is @xmath371 ( by the arguments above ) , it follows that @xmath376 is a quasi - isomorphism . therefore @xmath377 , and by induction @xmath378 $ ] is isomorphic in @xmath158 to a complex in @xmath339 . using @xmath379 implies that @xmath347 is isomorphic in @xmath158 to a complex in @xmath339 . _ example . _ without the assumption on @xmath1-dominant dimension , proposition [ prop : nu - stable complexes ] may fail in general : let @xmath0 be the @xmath12-algebra given by the quiver @xmath380^{\alpha } & 2\ar@/^/[l]^{\beta}\ar@/^/[r]^{\gamma } & 3\ar@/^/[l]^{\delta } } \ ] ] and relations @xmath381 . the indecomposable projective left @xmath0-modules are @xmath382 the indecomposable injective left @xmath0-modules are @xmath383 let @xmath347 be the complex @xmath384 , where @xmath385 is the unique ( up to scalar ) non - zero map , and @xmath84 is placed in degree zero . then @xmath336 is a complex of the form @xmath386 . the obvious surjective maps @xmath387 and @xmath388 define a chain map from @xmath347 to @xmath389 and is a quasi - isomorphism . as a result , @xmath390 , but @xmath347 does not belong to @xmath339 , since @xmath391 . [ thm : restriction theorem ] let @xmath0 and @xmath3 be derived equivalent @xmath12-algebras , both of @xmath1-dominant dimension at least @xmath333 . then any derived equivalence @xmath392 restricts to an equivalence of triangulated subcategories . without loss of generality , we may assume that @xmath209 is a standard derived equivalence . then @xmath209 induces @xmath393 as triangulated subcategories , and @xmath394 in @xmath184 , for any @xmath395 . thus @xmath396 and so by proposition [ prop : nu - stable complexes ] . let @xmath397 be a quasi - inverse of @xmath209 . the same arguments applied to @xmath397 imply @xmath398 . therefore , @xmath209 induces an equivalence @xmath399 . _ theorem [ thm : restriction theorem ] has two predecessors : a special case , stated only for gendo - symmetric algebras , was proved in @xcite , where it was used to relate the hochschild cohomology of @xmath0 and that of its associated self - injective algebra . a result in the same spirit as theorem [ thm : restriction theorem ] was obtained in @xcite without any restriction on algebras , but assuming @xmath209 to be an ( iterated ) almost @xmath1-stable derived equivalence . [ cor : restriction theorem for morita algebras ] let @xmath0 and @xmath3 be derived equivalent @xmath12-algebras , both of @xmath1-dominant dimension at least @xmath333 . then the associated self - injective algebras of @xmath0 and @xmath3 are derived equivalent . in particular , every derived equivalence of morita algebras induces a derived equivalence of their associated self - injective algebras . let @xmath98 be an associated self - injective algebra of @xmath0 . then by definition @xmath400 as additive categories , and thus @xmath401 as triangulated categories . the statement then follows directly from theorem [ thm : restriction theorem ] . an application of corollary [ cor : restriction theorem for morita algebras ] is to auslander algebras : a ( finite dimensional ) @xmath12-algebra @xmath0 is said to be of _ finite representation type _ , if there are only finitely many indecomposable @xmath0-modules ( up to isomorphism ) . the _ auslander algebra _ @xmath402 of @xmath0 is defined to be the endomorphism ring of the direct sum of all pairwise non - isomorphic indecomposable left @xmath0-modules . [ cor : restriction theorem for auslander algebras ] let @xmath0 and @xmath3 be self - injective @xmath12-algebras , both of finite representation type . let @xmath402 and @xmath403 be the auslander algebras of @xmath0 and @xmath3 respectively . then \(1 ) @xmath402 and @xmath403 are derived equivalent if and only if @xmath0 and @xmath3 are derived equivalent . \(2 ) if @xmath402 and @xmath403 are derived equivalent , then they are stably equivalent of morita type . \(1 ) if @xmath0 and @xmath3 are derived equivalent , then by ( * ? ? ? * corollary 3.13 ) , their auslander algebras @xmath402 and @xmath403 are derived equivalent . conversely , if @xmath402 and @xmath403 are derived equivalent , then by corollary [ cor : restriction theorem for morita algebras ] @xmath0 and @xmath3 are derived equivalent , since @xmath0 and @xmath3 are the associated self - injective algebras of @xmath402 and @xmath403 respectively . \(2 ) if @xmath402 and @xmath403 are derived equivalent , then @xmath0 and @xmath3 are derived equivalent by ( 1 ) , and thus stably equivalent of morita type by ( * ? ? ? * corollary 5.5 ) . now ( * ? ? ? * theorem 1.1 ) implies that @xmath402 and @xmath403 are stably equivalent of morita type . in this section , the two invariance theorems will be proven . for almost self - injective algebras the approach is to show that standard equivalences have a special form ; they are iterated almost @xmath1-stable and therefore preserve both global and dominant dimension . for algebras with a duality , a rather different approach will be taken , identifying the two homological dimensions inside the derived category . before addressing invariance , in the first subsection the general question is addressed how much homological dimensions can vary under derived equivalences . as it is well - known , the difference of global dimensions of two derived equivalent algebras is bounded by the length of a tilting complex inducing a derived equivalence , see for example ( * ? ? ? * section 12.5(b ) ) . more precisely , let @xmath0 be a @xmath12-algebra , and define the _ length _ of a radical complex @xmath137 in @xmath404 to be @xmath405 the length of an arbitrary complex @xmath160 in @xmath404 is defined to be the length of the unique radical complex that is isomorphic to @xmath160 in @xmath404 ( lemma [ lem : morphisms in derived categories ] ) . [ prop : bound global dimension ] let @xmath406 be a derived equivalence between @xmath12-algebras . then @xmath407 . naively , one may expect that dominant dimension behaves similarly under derived equivalences . here is a counterexample : let @xmath65 be an integer , and let @xmath0 be the @xmath12-algebra given by the quiver @xmath408_{\alpha_1 } & 3\ar[l]_{\alpha_2 } & \cdots \ar[l]_{\alpha_3 } & 2n\ar[l]_(.45){\alpha_{2n-1 } } & 2n+1\ar[l]_{\alpha_{2n } } } \ ] ] and relations @xmath409 . let @xmath410 denote the simple left @xmath0-module corresponding to the vertex @xmath169 and @xmath411 be the projective cover of @xmath410 . the modules @xmath411 are projective - injective for @xmath412 . the projective dimensions of the simple modules are @xmath413 , @xmath414 for @xmath415 , and the minimal injective resolution of the left regular @xmath0-module is of the form @xmath416 consequently , @xmath417 . let @xmath418 be the apr - tilting module ( see , for instance , ( * ? ? ? * vi.2.8 ) ) associated with the projective simple @xmath0-module @xmath419 , and let @xmath420 . then @xmath421 and therefore the derived equivalence between @xmath0 and @xmath3 induced by @xmath422 is given by a two - term tilting complex . by direct computation , @xmath3 is seen to be isomorphic to the @xmath12-algebra given by the same quiver as @xmath0 but with different relations @xmath423 for @xmath424 . as a result , @xmath425 and the difference between dominant dimensions of @xmath0 and @xmath3 is @xmath426 , although the derived equivalence is induced by a tilting module . although this example smashes any hope to bound the difference of dominant dimensions of derived equivalent algebras in terms of lengths of tilting complexes , there are still some cases where both global dimension and dominant dimension behave nicely , see @xcite and @xcite . note that both algebras in the example above are of @xmath1-dominant dimension @xmath427 . this suggests to restrict attention to algebras of @xmath1-dominant dimension at least @xmath333 - a restriction that has been needed for theorem [ thm : restriction theorem ] and that will be further justified by the invariance results later on . [ thm : bound the difference ] let @xmath0 and @xmath3 be @xmath12-algebras , both of @xmath1-dominant dimension at least @xmath333 and derived equivalent by @xmath310 . then @xmath428 . let @xmath429 and @xmath430 . since @xmath431 by ( * ? ? ? * lemma 2.1 ) , it is enough to show that @xmath432 if @xmath433 , there is nothing left to prove . assume that @xmath209 is a standard derived equivalence , @xmath434 and @xmath435 is a radical tilting complex in @xmath186 of the following form ( up to degree shift ) @xmath436 where @xmath352 is nonzero and placed in degree @xmath427 . take a cartan - eilenberg injective resolution @xmath355 of @xmath347 that is the total complex of the double complex obtained by taking minimal injective resolutions of @xmath437 for all @xmath169 . since @xmath438 and @xmath439 , the modules @xmath51 are strongly projective - injective for @xmath440 by lemma [ lem : two dominant dimensions coincide ] . let @xmath441 and @xmath442 be the brutal truncations of @xmath355 . by definition of brutal truncation , there is a triangle in @xmath443 @xmath444{\longrightarrow}{i^{\bullet}}_{{\geqslant}m}{\longrightarrow}{i^{\bullet}}{\longrightarrow}{i^{\bullet}}_{<m}.\ ] ] the standard derived equivalence @xmath209 lifts to a derived equivalence ( denoted by @xmath209 again ) from @xmath374 to @xmath443 . applying @xmath445 to the triangle @xmath231 , we obtain the triangle in @xmath374 @xmath446{\longrightarrow}\mathcal{f}^{-1}({i^{\bullet}}_{{\geqslant}m}){\longrightarrow}\mathcal{f}^{-1}({i^{\bullet}}){\longrightarrow}\mathcal{f}^{-1}({i^{\bullet}}_{<m } ) \end{aligned}\ ] ] and therefore the long exact sequence @xmath447 note that @xmath448 in @xmath374 , and @xmath449 belongs to @xmath339 by the construction of @xmath441 and theorem [ thm : restriction theorem ] . moreover , lemma [ lem : morphisms in derived categories ] implies for @xmath450 , @xmath451 ) \cong { { \rm hom } } _ { { \mathscr{d}(b)}}({p^{\bullet } } , { i^{\bullet}}_{{\geqslant}m}[i ] ) = 0 \end{aligned}\ ] ] since @xmath452)^p = 0 $ ] for @xmath453 and @xmath450 . therefore , from the long exact sequence ( [ eqn : long exact sequence ] ) , @xmath454 for @xmath313 , @xmath455 , and for @xmath456 . hence @xmath449 is isomorphic to a radical complex in @xmath339 of the form @xmath457 such that @xmath458 is exact . consequently the dominant dimension of @xmath0 is at least @xmath459 , as desired . a special case of theorem [ thm : bound the difference ] is : [ cor : bound difference for morita algebras ] let @xmath0 and @xmath3 be morita algebras . if there is a derived equivalence , then @xmath428 . interactions between derived equivalences and stable equivalences frequently seem to be of particular interest , see @xcite and the references therein . * corollary 5.5 ) and corollary [ cor : restriction theorem for auslander algebras ] state that , for self - injective algebras and auslander algebras of finite representation type self - injective algebras , derived equivalences imply stable equivalences of morita type . the following theorem implies that the same holds for almost self - injective algebras , by characterising all derived equivalences among them as iterated almost @xmath1-stable derived equivalences . [ thm : derived equivalences for almost self - injective ] let @xmath0 and @xmath3 be derived equivalent almost self - injective algebras . then any standard derived equivalence @xmath392 is an iterated almost @xmath1-stable derived equivalence ( up to shifts ) . in particular , derived equivalent almost self - injective algebras are stably equivalent of morita type . to prove this theorem , we need some preparations . first , we recall some basics on @xmath460-split sequences introduced in @xcite , see also @xcite . let @xmath461 be an additive category and let @xmath462 be a full subcategory of @xmath461 . a morphism @xmath463 in @xmath461 is a _ right @xmath462-approximation _ , if @xmath464 and for any @xmath465 , the canonical morphism @xmath466 is an epimorphism . we call @xmath264 _ right minimal _ if an equality @xmath467 implies that @xmath468 is an isomorphism , for left @xmath462-approximations and left minimal morphisms are defined similarly . let @xmath138 be a triangulated category and let @xmath469 be a full ( not necessarily triangulated ) additive subcategory of @xmath138 . a triangle in @xmath138 @xmath470\ ] ] is called a _ @xmath469-split triangle _ if @xmath264 is a left @xmath469-approximation and @xmath41 is a right @xmath469-approximation . a full subcategory @xmath471 of @xmath138 is called a _ tilting subcategory _ if @xmath472)=0 $ ] for all @xmath473 and @xmath23 itself is the only triangulated subcategory of @xmath23 that contains @xmath474 and is closed under taking direct summands . an object @xmath422 in @xmath138 is a _ tilting object _ if @xmath475 is a tilting subcategory of @xmath138 . for example , all tilting complexes over an algebra @xmath0 are tilting objects in @xmath185 . [ lem : d - split sequences ] let @xmath138 be a triangulated category , and @xmath469 an additive full subcategory of @xmath138 . let @xmath476 $ ] be a @xmath469-split triangle . then : \(1 ) suppose that @xmath264 is left minimal and @xmath41 is right minimal , and that @xmath477 and @xmath478 are decompositions of @xmath24 and @xmath26 into strongly indecomposable direct summands . then @xmath479 . in particular , if indecomposable objects in @xmath138 are strongly indecomposable , then @xmath24 is indecomposable if and only if so is @xmath26 . \(2 ) if @xmath480 is a tilting subcategory of @xmath23 and @xmath481 is injective , then @xmath482 is also a tilting subcategory of @xmath23 . \(3 ) if @xmath482 is a tilting subcategory of @xmath23 and @xmath483 is injective , then @xmath484 is also a tilting subcategory of @xmath23 . \(2 ) and ( 3 ) follow from ( * ? ? ? * theorem 2.32 ) . it remains to prove ( 1 ) . if @xmath485 , then and we are done . now we assume that @xmath486 . then @xmath487 and @xmath488 , since otherwise @xmath489 or @xmath490 , which contradicts the minimality of @xmath264 and @xmath41 . to proceed , let @xmath491 and @xmath492 . for any @xmath493 and @xmath494 , there exist @xmath495 with @xmath496 , and @xmath497 with @xmath498 since @xmath264 is a left @xmath460-approximation . therefore , @xmath499 , which implies @xmath500 . similarly @xmath501 and so @xmath502 is a two - sided ideal of @xmath25 . to see @xmath503 , it suffices to show , by ( * ? ? ? * theorem 15.3 , p. 166 ) , that @xmath504 is invertible in @xmath25 for each @xmath493 . let @xmath496 for some @xmath495 . in the diagram in @xmath23 @xmath505\ar[r]^{-h[-1 ] } \ar@{=}[d]^{\mathrm{id } } & x \ar[r]^f \ar[d]^{1-\alpha } & d \ar[r]^g \ar@{-->}[d]^\beta & y \ar@{=}[d]^{\mathrm{id}}\\ y[-1]\ar[r]^{-h[-1 ] } & x \ar[r]^f & d \ar[r]^g & y}\ ] ] the first square commutes because @xmath506\cdot \alpha = h[-1]\cdot f\cdot u=0 $ ] , and @xmath507 exists so that the other squares commute by axioms of triangulated categories . since @xmath41 is a right minimal morphism , @xmath507 is an isomorphism , and thus again by axioms of triangulated categories , @xmath504 is an isomorphism . by similar arguments , @xmath508 is a two - sided ideal of @xmath509 and it is contained in the jacobson radical @xmath510 of @xmath509 . we first construct a ring homomorphism @xmath511 as follows . for each @xmath512 , there exists a commutative diagram in @xmath23 @xmath513^f \ar[d]^\alpha & d \ar[r]^g \ar@{.>}[d]^\beta & y \ar[r]^h \ar@{-->}[d]^\gamma & x[1]\ar[d]^{\alpha[1]}\\ x \ar[r]^f & d \ar[r]^g & y \ar[r]^h & x[1]}\ ] ] where @xmath507 exists since @xmath264 is a left @xmath460-approximation , and @xmath514 exists by axioms of triangulated categories . if @xmath515 and @xmath516 are different choices such that @xmath517 and @xmath518 , then @xmath519 which implies that @xmath520 for some @xmath521 . in other words , the image of @xmath514 in the quotient ring @xmath522 is well - defined , and thus @xmath523 is well - defined . then @xmath524 is a ring homomorphism . it is surjective since @xmath41 is a right @xmath460-approximation . the kernel of @xmath524 equals @xmath502 . for any @xmath493 , there exists @xmath525 with @xmath526 . so @xmath527 @xmath528\cdot v[1]=0 $ ] which implies that @xmath523 factors through @xmath41 and thus @xmath529 . on the other hand , for any , there exists @xmath521 with @xmath530 , and so @xmath506\cdot \alpha = \phi(\alpha)[-1]\cdot h[-1 ] = ( u\cdot g\cdot h)[-1]=0 $ ] which implies that @xmath468 factors through @xmath264 and thus . altogether , @xmath524 induces an isomorphism @xmath531 , and hence further an isomorphism @xmath532 since both @xmath24 and @xmath26 are decomposed into strongly indecomposable direct summands , it follows that both rings @xmath25 and @xmath509 are semi - perfect rings by , and therefore the isomorphism above implies that @xmath25 and @xmath509 have the same number of simple left modules , or equivalently the same number of indecomposable projective left modules . consequently , @xmath24 and @xmath26 have the same number of indecomposable direct summands , that is @xmath479 . [ lem : tilting complex over almost self - injective algebras ] let @xmath0 be an almost self - injective algebra , but not self - injective . let @xmath103 be an additive generator of @xmath73 and let @xmath70 be the unique indecomposable projective left @xmath0-module such that @xmath533 . let @xmath534 be an indecomposable radical complex in @xmath185 . if @xmath535 is a tilting complex over @xmath0 , then at least one of the following two assertions holds true : \(1 ) there exists @xmath536 such that @xmath537 , @xmath315 for all @xmath72 and for all @xmath538 , and @xmath539 in @xmath73 for all @xmath540 ; \(2 ) there exists @xmath541 such that @xmath542 , @xmath315 for all @xmath313 and for all @xmath543 , and @xmath539 in @xmath73 for all @xmath544 . _ special case . _ the complex @xmath192 has only one nonzero term , that is , @xmath545 $ ] for some @xmath546 and @xmath547 . then @xmath548 is indecomposable since @xmath192 is indecomposable . if , then @xmath549 which contradicts the assumption that @xmath535 , as a tilting complex , generates @xmath185 . since each indecomposable projective left @xmath0-module is either isomorphic to @xmath70 or strongly projective - injective , by the definition of almost self - injective algebras @xmath548 must be isomorphic to @xmath70 . we still have to show that @xmath550 . assume @xmath551 . then by the self - orthogonality of tilting complexes , , which implies @xmath552 , a contradiction to @xmath89 . so , @xmath553 , which satisfies both conditions ( 1 ) and ( 2 ) . in the _ general case _ , @xmath554 is an indecomposable radical complex of the following form @xmath555 where @xmath556 are nonzero projective left @xmath0-modules and @xmath557 . using the self - orthogonality of the tilting complex @xmath535 , we are going to check : to see ( a ) , assume on the contrary that @xmath558 is a nonzero common direct summand of both @xmath559 and @xmath560 . let @xmath561 be a split epimorphism from @xmath559 to @xmath558 and @xmath562 be a split monomorphism from @xmath558 to @xmath560 . then the composition @xmath563 from @xmath559 to @xmath560 defines a nonzero morphism in @xmath564)$ ] , because @xmath192 is a radical complex . but this contradicts the assumption that @xmath192 is self - orthogonal and @xmath565 , which forces any morphism from @xmath192 to @xmath566 $ ] in @xmath185 to be zero . similarly , ( b ) and ( c ) follow since for any @xmath551 , @xmath567)=0= { { \rm hom } } _ { { \mathscr{k}^{\rm b}({a\mbox{{\sf -proj}}})}}(e , { t^{\bullet}}[m]).\ ] ] as a consequence of the claim , @xmath568 or @xmath569 . indeed , if @xmath570 and @xmath571 , then by ( b ) and ( c ) , @xmath559 and @xmath560 have a common direct summand @xmath70 , which contradicts ( a ) . we will finish the proof by analysing these two cases . _ case @xmath572 . _ by ( b ) , @xmath573 and then @xmath574 by ( a ) . let @xmath575 be the brutal truncation of @xmath192 , which by definition provides the following triangle in @xmath185 : @xmath576{\stackrel{f}{{\longrightarrow } } } t^0 { \stackrel{g}{{\longrightarrow } } } { t^{\bullet}}{\longrightarrow}{t^{\bullet}}_{<0 } \end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath264 is the chain morphism induced by @xmath577 , and @xmath41 is the chain morphism induced by @xmath578 . applying @xmath579 to this triangle gives the short exact sequence @xmath580,e){\rightarrow}0 \end{aligned}\ ] ] since @xmath581 trivially and @xmath582,e)=0 $ ] by @xmath535 being tilting . in particular , @xmath583 is injective , and @xmath264 is a left @xmath584-approximation . the morphism @xmath264 is left minimal . for any @xmath585 with @xmath586 , we have @xmath587 . thus @xmath561 defines a chain morphism @xmath588 in @xmath185 with @xmath589 and @xmath590 for all @xmath473 . now @xmath192 being an indecomposable complex in @xmath185 implies that @xmath591 is a local @xmath12-algebra , and therefore @xmath592 is either nilpotent or invertible . if @xmath592 is nilpotent in @xmath591 , say @xmath593 for some @xmath547 , then there exists a homotopy morphism such that @xmath594 . by definition of @xmath192 , the map @xmath595 is zero . thus , and hence @xmath596 is a split monomorphism . but this contradicts @xmath192 being a radical complex . it follows that @xmath264 is a left minimal morphism . applying @xmath597 to the triangle ( [ eqn : key triangle ] ) implies that @xmath41 is a right @xmath584-approximation . since @xmath41 induces an isomorphism @xmath598 , @xmath41 is a right minimal morphism . consequently , the triangle ( [ eqn : key triangle ] ) is a @xmath584-split sequence , with @xmath583 being an injective morphism . thus , by lemma [ lem : d - split sequences ] ( 1 ) and ( 3 ) , @xmath575 is an indecomposable radical complex , and @xmath599\oplus e$ ] is a tilting complex over @xmath0 . replacing @xmath192 by @xmath599 $ ] and repeating the same arguments @xmath600 times , we finally get that @xmath559 is indecomposable and @xmath601 is a tilting complex over @xmath0 , whereby @xmath559 is isomorphic to @xmath70 and the assertion ( 1 ) holds . _ case @xmath602 . _ by similar arguments as in the previous case , the assertion ( 2 ) in the statement can be verified for @xmath192 . since the case @xmath603 has been shown already , all cases have been settled . with these preparations , we are now able to prove theorem [ thm : derived equivalences for almost self - injective ] . first we assume that one of @xmath0 or @xmath3 is self - injective . when the ground field is algebraically closed , being self - injective is invariant under derived equivalence , by @xcite . under our assumption @xmath604 , invariance of being self - injective can be shown as follows , without any restriction on the ground field . by assumption , both @xmath0 and @xmath3 have @xmath604 . then @xmath0 is self - injective if and only if @xmath605 , and similarly for @xmath3 . by theorem [ thm : restriction theorem ] , the given derived equivalence @xmath209 induces an equivalence @xmath606 of triangulated subcategories . hence , both @xmath0 and @xmath3 are self - injective . now , ( * ? ? ? * proposition 3.8 ) implies that @xmath209 is an almost @xmath1-stable derived equivalence up to degree shift . next , we assume that neither @xmath0 nor @xmath3 is self - injective . let @xmath607 and @xmath608 be basic additive generators of @xmath73 and @xmath609 respectively . then the number of indecomposable direct summands of @xmath608 is exactly one less than the number of the simple left @xmath3-modules . since @xmath89 and @xmath438 , the derived equivalence @xmath209 induces an equivalence @xmath610 of triangulated subcategories , again by theorem [ thm : restriction theorem ] . let @xmath611 be the image of @xmath607 in @xmath186 under the equivalence . then @xmath612 generates @xmath613 , and @xmath614)=0 $ ] unless @xmath615 . without loss of generality , we assume that @xmath611 is , up to degree shift , a radical complex of the form @xmath616 where @xmath617 for all @xmath169 . by ( * ? ? ? * proposition 4.1 ) , there exists a complex @xmath137 in @xmath186 such that @xmath618 is a basic tilting complex over @xmath3 , inducing an almost @xmath1-stable derived equivalence @xmath619 where @xmath620 . let @xmath192 be a radical complex such that @xmath621 . then @xmath622 . in particular , @xmath623 is a tilting complex over @xmath0 and @xmath192 is indecomposable . hence by lemma [ lem : tilting complex over almost self - injective algebras ] and ( * ? ? ? * theorem 1.3(5 ) ) , @xmath37 is an iterated almost @xmath1-stable derived equivalence up to degree shift , and thus @xmath624 is an iterated almost @xmath1-stable derived equivalence . let @xmath0 and @xmath3 be self - injective @xmath12-algebras and let @xmath24 ( respectively @xmath26 ) be an indecomposable left @xmath0-module ( respectively left @xmath3-module ) . if @xmath625 and @xmath626 are derived equivalent , then every standard derived equivalence between them is an iterated almost @xmath1-stable derived equivalence ( up to degree shift ) , and the two endomorphism algebras are stably equivalent of morita type . by definition [ def : morita algebras ] , both endomorphism algebras are almost self - injective algebras . the statements then follow directly from theorem [ thm : derived equivalences for almost self - injective ] . _ example . _ theorem [ thm : derived equivalences for almost self - injective ] may fail if the algebras @xmath0 and @xmath3 are not assumed to be almost self - injective . here is an example . let @xmath627/(x^2,y^2)$ ] , and let @xmath628 be the unique simple @xmath629-module . then @xmath629 is a self - injective @xmath12-algebra and the auslander - reiten sequence @xmath630 is an @xmath631-split sequence in the sense of @xcite . by ( * theorem 1.1 ) , the endomorphism algebras @xmath632 and @xmath633 are derived equivalent . by direct checking , both @xmath0 and @xmath3 are seen to have @xmath1-dominant dimension at least two , but none of them is an almost self - injective algebra . since @xmath634 and @xmath635 , the algebras @xmath0 and @xmath3 can not be stably equivalent of morita type . combining proposition [ prop : almost nu - stable preserve dimensions ] and theorem [ thm : derived equivalences for almost self - injective ] yields the _ first invariance theorem _ : [ cor : class almost self - injective algebras ] derived equivalences between almost self - injective algebras preserve both global dimension and dominant dimension . many algebras have anti - automorphisms that preserve simple modules . prominent examples are involutory such anti - automorphisms , often called dualities , which are fundamental ingredients of the definition of cellular algebras . among the examples are group algebras of symmetric groups in any characteristic , many hecke algebras , brauer algebras , temperley - lieb algebras and many classes of schur algebras . in particular , quasi - hereditary algebras with duality occur frequently in algebraic lie theory . they have been studied in @xcite from the point of view of dominant dimension , motivating the concept of gendo - symmetric algebras and our present investigation of invariance properties . the anti - automorphisms defining dualities often occur as shadows of cartan involutions . a much larger class of algebras ( with anti - automorphisms not required to be involutions ) will be shown now to satisfy homological invariance properties . after establishing various elementary properties of the class of algebras with anti - automorphism preserving simples , both global and dominant dimension will get identified explicitly in the derived category , in terms of complexes occurring in canonical triangles . now we state precisely what we mean by an anti - automorphism preserving simples , and then we collect basic properties of algebras with such anti - automorphisms . see also @xcite and the references therein for further discussion of the special case of dualities . let @xmath0 be a @xmath12-algebra and let @xmath636 be an algebra anti - automorphism . for each ( left ) @xmath0-module @xmath27 , the @xmath514-twist of @xmath27 , denoted by @xmath637 , is defined to be the right @xmath0-module that equals @xmath27 as a @xmath12-vector space , and is equipped with the right @xmath0-action : @xmath638 the notation @xmath639 is reserved for this action . we define the twist of a right @xmath0-module or an @xmath0-bimodule similarly . for an @xmath0-bimodule @xmath27 , there are two different right @xmath0-module structures on @xmath640 : the usual one from the right @xmath0-action on @xmath27 and the twisted one from the left @xmath0-action on @xmath27 . to emphasize the difference , we write @xmath641 for the former and @xmath642 for the latter . if for every simple @xmath0-module @xmath628 , the @xmath12-dual of @xmath643 is isomorphic to @xmath628 as @xmath0-modules , then we say that _ @xmath514 fixes all simple modules_. a @xmath12-algebra will be called @xmath12-split , if the endomorphism rings of simple @xmath0-modules are just @xmath12 . then simple @xmath0-bimodules are tensor products of simple left @xmath0-modules with simple right @xmath0-modules . [ lem : twist bimodule ] let @xmath0 be a split @xmath12-algebra with an anti - automorphism @xmath644 fixing all simple @xmath0-modules . then : @xmath106 for each primitive idempotent @xmath61 in @xmath0 , the idempotent @xmath645 is conjugate to @xmath61 in @xmath0 . @xmath108 for each projective - injective @xmath0-module @xmath70 , the @xmath0-module @xmath646 is projective - injective . @xmath109 @xmath647 . in particular , @xmath0 is a morita algebra if and only if @xmath62 . @xmath110 @xmath648 , @xmath649 , and @xmath650 in @xmath651 , for every simple @xmath0-bimodule @xmath652 . @xmath653 let @xmath61 be a basic idempotent such that @xmath654 . then in @xmath655 , @xmath656 @xmath657 if @xmath27 is a non - zero @xmath0-bimodule with @xmath658 in @xmath651 , then @xmath659 . @xmath660 if @xmath27 and @xmath661 are @xmath0-bimodules with @xmath658 and @xmath662 in @xmath663 , then in @xmath651 @xmath664 @xmath665 if @xmath666 is a complex in @xmath667 and @xmath668 is an integer such that : @xmath669 , and @xmath670 for all @xmath671 , then @xmath672 , ( \operatorname{\mathrm{d}}{m^{\bullet}})[-d])\neq 0\}$ ] . \(1 ) let @xmath673 be the @xmath12-linear map defined by @xmath674 , for any @xmath675 . then @xmath676 for any @xmath677 . ( note that here @xmath91 gets twisted by @xmath678 . ) so @xmath679 is a right @xmath0-module isomorphism . now for each simple left @xmath0-module @xmath628 , @xmath680 by the assumption on @xmath644 . therefore , @xmath61 and @xmath645 are conjugate idempotents in @xmath0 . \(2 ) we may assume that @xmath70 is an indecomposable projective - injective @xmath0-module , thus of the form @xmath91 for some idempotent @xmath61 . then @xmath681 and @xmath682 by ( 1 ) . therefore , @xmath60 is projective - injective and @xmath683 is so , too . \(3 ) let @xmath91 be a basic projective - injective @xmath0-module such that every projective - injective @xmath0-module @xmath70 belongs to @xmath95 . then @xmath684 as @xmath0-modules by ( 2 ) . in other words , every projective - injective @xmath0-module is a strongly projective - injective @xmath0-module . so by definition , @xmath685 . the claim about morita algebras then follows from proposition [ prop : characterise morita algebras ] . \(4 ) let @xmath686 be the @xmath12-linear morphism defined by : @xmath687 for @xmath688 . then for any @xmath689 , there are equalities @xmath690 in @xmath691 . thus @xmath692 is an @xmath0-bimodule isomorphism and so is the @xmath12-dual of @xmath692 , that is , @xmath693 as @xmath0-bimodules . since @xmath0 is a split @xmath12-algebra , it follows that every simple @xmath0-bimodule @xmath652 is of the form @xmath694 , where @xmath628 and @xmath695 are simple left @xmath0-modules . thus , there is a series of isomorphisms of @xmath0-bimodules @xmath696 as the anti - automorphism @xmath644 fixes simple @xmath0-modules by assumption . \(5 ) since @xmath697 , the minimal faithful @xmath0-module @xmath91 is basic and projective - injective . by ( 2 ) , @xmath698 is also basic and projective - injective . as a result , @xmath699 as @xmath0-modules , and therefore @xmath700 as @xmath701-bimodules for some automorphism @xmath702 of @xmath6 . so for all @xmath703 @xmath704 \(6 ) since @xmath705 , there exists a simple @xmath0-bimodule @xmath652 such that @xmath706 . therefore @xmath707 thus the composition of an epimorphism from @xmath27 to @xmath652 followed by a monomorphism from @xmath652 to @xmath708 in @xmath651 defines a nonzero morphism from @xmath27 to @xmath708 . in particular , @xmath709 . \(7 ) since @xmath658 and @xmath710 in @xmath663 as @xmath0-bimodules , it follows that @xmath711 as @xmath0-modules for all @xmath712 . @xmath665 by definition , the complex @xmath713 $ ] has vanishing cohomology in degrees larger than @xmath427 , and @xmath714 $ ] has vanishing cohomology in degrees smaller than @xmath427 . this implies that @xmath715 , ( \operatorname{\mathrm{d}}{m^{\bullet}})[-d])=0 $ ] for all @xmath716 . moreover , by lemma [ lem : morphisms in derived categories](3 ) , @xmath717 , ( \operatorname{\mathrm{d}}{m^{\bullet}})[-m])$ ] is isomorphic to @xmath718 , which is nonzero by ( 6 ) . [ thm : class with anti - automorphisms ] let @xmath0 and @xmath3 be derived equivalent split @xmath12-algebras . \(a ) if both @xmath0 and @xmath3 have anti - automorphisms fixing all simple modules , then . \(b ) if furthermore both @xmath0 and @xmath3 have dominant dimension at least @xmath333 , then . for the proof of the theorem , we need the following lemma . let @xmath0 be a @xmath12-split algebra with an anti - automorphism @xmath644 fixing all simple @xmath0-modules , and let @xmath61 be an idempotent such that @xmath91 is basic and @xmath654 . then , in the canonical triangle @xmath719,\ ] ] for each integer @xmath169 , we have @xmath720 as @xmath0-bimodules . [ lem : canonical - complex - va ] first of all , it follows from lemma [ lem : twist bimodule](1 ) that @xmath721 and @xmath91 are isomorphic left @xmath0-modules , and consequently @xmath645 and @xmath61 are conjugate in @xmath0 , namely , there is an invertible element @xmath722 such that @xmath723 . we fix this notation throughout the proof . let @xmath724 be the canonical map sending each element @xmath688 to the map @xmath725 . from the long exact sequence of cohomologies induced by the canonical triangle * ct2 * , it follows that @xmath726 for each @xmath712 , we have the following isomorphisms of @xmath0-bimodules @xmath727 where the last isomorphism follows from lemma [ lem : twist bimodule ] ( 5 ) . thus , for each integer @xmath72 , there is an isomorphism @xmath720 of @xmath0-bimodules . it remains to consider the cohomologies of @xmath728 in degrees @xmath427 and @xmath363 . for this purpose , we need four @xmath0-bimodules isomorphisms . we write down these isomorphisms explicitly , and it is straightforward to check that they are really @xmath0-bimodule homomorphisms . the first is @xmath729 note that @xmath723 and @xmath730 . let @xmath731 be the map sending @xmath732 to @xmath733 . the second isomorphism reads as follows . @xmath734 by assumption @xmath91 is basic and @xmath654 . then @xmath735 is again in @xmath95 , basic and has the same number of indecomposable direct summands as @xmath91 . hence @xmath736 as left @xmath0-modules . it follows that @xmath737 as left @xmath0-modules . equivalently , @xmath738 as right @xmath0-modules , and there is some automorphism @xmath739 of @xmath6 such that @xmath740 as @xmath6-@xmath0-bimodules . let @xmath741 be such an isomorphism . the third isomorphism is the canonical map @xmath742 and the fourth isomorphism is a composition @xmath743 from the proof of lemma [ lem : twist bimodule ] ( 4 ) , the map @xmath744 is an @xmath0-bimodule isomorphism . then it is straightforward to check that the diagram @xmath745^(.4){\eta}\ar[dddd]^{\omega } & { { \rm hom } } _ { eae}(ea , ea)\ar[d]^{c_{\omega}}\\ & { } ^{\omega}{{\rm hom } } _ { \omega(e)a\omega(e)}(a\omega(e ) , a\omega(e))^{\omega}\ar[d]^{c_u}\\ & { } ^{\omega}{{\rm hom } } _ { eae}(ae , ae)^{\omega}\ar[d]^{\operatorname{\mathrm{d}}}\\ & { } ^{\omega}{{\rm hom } } _ { eae}(\operatorname{\mathrm{d}}(ae ) , \operatorname{\mathrm{d}}(ae))^{\omega}\ar[d]^{c_{\tau}}\\ { } ^{\omega}\!\!a^{\omega}\ar[r]^(.4){\eta } & { } ^{\omega}{{\rm hom } } _ { eae}(ea , ea)^{\omega } } \quad\quad ( \star)\ ] ] is commutative . actually , for each @xmath688 , the image of @xmath746 under @xmath747 is @xmath748 , which sends each @xmath749 to @xmath750 . the image of @xmath746 under @xmath751 is @xmath752 . then one can check that there is a commutative diagram @xmath753^{\tau^{-1}}\ar[r]^{r_{\omega(a ) } } & ea\ar[d]^{\tau^{-1}}\\ \operatorname{\mathrm{d}}(ae)\ar[r]^{\operatorname{\mathrm{d}}(r_{u}^{-1}\omega^{-1}r_a\omega r_u ) } & \operatorname{\mathrm{d}}(ae ) } \ ] ] of right @xmath0-modules . this means precisely that the image of @xmath746 under @xmath754 is the same as its image under @xmath751 . thus , the diagram @xmath755 is commutative , and induces another commutative diagram @xmath756 & \operatorname{{ker}}\eta\ar[r]\ar@{-->}[d]^{\cong } & a\ar[d]^{\omega}\ar[r]^(.3){\eta } & { { \rm hom } } _ { eae}(ea , ea)\ar[d]^{c_{\omega}c_u\operatorname{\mathrm{d}}c_{\tau}}\ar[r ] & \operatorname{{coker}}\eta\ar[r]\ar@{-->}[d]^{\cong } & 0\\ 0\ar[r ] & { } ^{\omega}(\operatorname{{ker}}\eta)^{\omega}\ar[r ] & { } ^{\omega}\!\!a^{\omega}\ar[r]^(.3){\eta } & { } ^{\omega}{{\rm hom } } _ { eae}(ea , ea)^{\omega}\ar[r ] & { } ^{\omega}(\operatorname{{coker}}\eta)^{\omega}\ar[r ] & 0 } \ ] ] where the rows are exact and vertical maps are @xmath0-bimodule isomorphisms . this finishes the proof . \(a ) proposition [ prop : bound global dimension ] implies that if @xmath0 or @xmath3 has infinite global dimension , then so does the other and we are done . now assume @xmath0 and @xmath3 to have finite global dimension and @xmath757 to be a standard derived equivalence . let @xmath41 and @xmath758 be the global dimensions of @xmath0 and @xmath3 respectively , and let @xmath759 denote the bounded complex @xmath760 in @xmath761 , and @xmath762 the bounded complex @xmath763 in @xmath764 . then lemma [ lem : characterise global dimension ] can be reformulated as @xmath765 by lemma [ lem : twist bimodule ] ( 4 ) and ( 7 ) and by @xmath12-duality , @xmath766 as @xmath0-bimodules . note that @xmath767 . hence , by lemma [ lem : twist bimodule](8 ) , we get @xmath768 , ( \operatorname{\mathrm{d}}{r_a^{\bullet}})[-i])\neq 0\}.\ ] ] similarly @xmath769 , ( \operatorname{\mathrm{d}}{r_b^{\bullet}})[-i])\neq 0\}$ ] . let @xmath770 be the derived equivalence induced from the given standard derived equivalence between @xmath0 and @xmath3 . then @xmath771 and @xmath772 in @xmath773 by lemma [ lem : standard derived equivalence ] ( 1 ) , ( 3 ) and ( 4 ) . hence , @xmath774 , that is , @xmath0 and @xmath3 have the same global dimension . \(b ) let @xmath385 and @xmath775 be the @xmath1-dominant dimensions of @xmath0 and @xmath3 respectively . since both @xmath385 and @xmath775 are at least one by assumption , lemma [ lem : twist bimodule ] ( 3 ) ( or lemma [ lem : two dominant dimensions coincide ] ) implies that there is no need to distinguish between dominant dimension and @xmath1-dominant dimension . let @xmath61 and @xmath264 be basic idempotents in @xmath0 and @xmath3 , respectively , such that @xmath654 and @xmath776 . let @xmath777 $ ] and be the canonical triangles ( denoted by ( ct2 ) in [ subsectionstandarddereq ] ) associated to the idempotents @xmath61 and @xmath264 respectively . let @xmath778 . we claim that @xmath779 . as @xmath780 , the module @xmath60 is a faithful right @xmath0-module and @xmath781 is injective . in this case @xmath782 , and @xmath783 vanishes if and only if @xmath781 is also surjective , if and only if @xmath784 ( see @xcite ) . this implies that @xmath550 when @xmath785 . if @xmath784 , then it follows from mller s characterisation ( proposition [ prop : muller characterisation ] ) that @xmath779 . without loss of generality , the derived equivalence @xmath786 can be assumed to be standard and to be given by a two - sided tilting complex @xmath197 in @xmath218 . let @xmath787 be the induced standard derived equivalence and @xmath788 . then by theorem [ thm : restriction theorem ] and lemma [ lem : derived - equivalence - preserves - canonical - triangle ] , @xmath789 as triangles in @xmath790 , and in particular , @xmath791 in @xmath790 . thus , it follows from lemma [ lem : canonical - complex - va ] and lemma [ lem : twist bimodule](8 ) that @xmath792 , v_a(e)[-i])\neq 0\ } , \mbox { and } \ ] ] @xmath793 , v_b(f)[-i])\neq 0\}.\ ] ] since @xmath794 and @xmath795 , one has @xmath796 , and @xmath797 . the characterisations of global and dominant dimension , respectively , inside the derived category of the enveloping algebras , provided by the proof may be of independent interest . let @xmath0 be an algebra with an anti - automorphism preserving simples . @xmath798 let @xmath759 denote the bounded complex @xmath760 in @xmath761 . then the global dimension of @xmath0 , if finite , is determined in the category @xmath761 as @xmath799 , ( \operatorname{\mathrm{d}}{r_a^{\bullet}})[-i])\neq 0\}.\ ] ] @xmath800 suppose @xmath61 is an idempotent in @xmath0 such that @xmath91 is basic and @xmath654 . then the dominant dimension of @xmath0 is determined in the category @xmath761 by the canonical triangle @xmath719 , \mathrm { as}\ ] ] @xmath801 , v_a(e)[-i ] ) \neq 0\}.\ ] ] the proof of theorem [ thm : class with anti - automorphisms ] implies that ( a ) holds , and that ( b ) holds in case that @xmath59 . suppose that @xmath802 . then @xmath60 can not be a faithful @xmath0-module , and thus the canonical map @xmath803 is not injective . it follows that @xmath804 , which is @xmath805 , is nonzero . then , in this case , ( b ) follows from lemma [ lem : twist bimodule](8 ) . in the current context , the complexes @xmath759 used to identify global dimension are preserved at least by standard derived equivalences . the derived restriction theorem ( corollary [ cor : restriction theorem for morita algebras ] ) and theorem [ thm : restriction theorem ] upon which it is based , are a crucial ingredient of the above proof of theorem [ thm : class with anti - automorphisms ] . together with lemma [ lem : derived - equivalence - preserves - canonical - triangle ] , they guarantee that the canonical triangle * ( ct2 ) * is preserved under standard derived equivalences between algebras with positive @xmath1-dominant dimensions . let @xmath0 and @xmath3 be algebras with anti - automorphisms preserving simples . then a standard derived equivalence from @xmath0 to @xmath3 induces a standard equivalence from @xmath761 to @xmath773 that sends @xmath759 to @xmath806 . when an algebra @xmath0 with an anti - automorphism preserving simples is derived equivalent to an algebra @xmath3 , possibly without such an anti - automorphism , the proof of theorem [ thm : class with anti - automorphisms ] provides an inequality : [ cor : inequality ] let @xmath0 be an algebra with an anti - automorphism preserving simples and suppose @xmath0 is derived equivalent to an algebra @xmath3 . then there is an inequality . the characterisation of @xmath807 given in the proof of theorem [ thm : class with anti - automorphisms ] remains valid . then the non - vanishing over @xmath0 of @xmath808 , ( \operatorname{\mathrm{d}}{r_b^{\bullet}})[-g])\neq 0\}$ ] , implies a contradiction to @xmath809 . the following example shows that the assumption in the second invariance theorem [ thm : class with anti - automorphisms ] , requiring both algebras admitting an anti - automorphism preserving simples , can not be relaxed ; the inequality in corollary [ cor : inequality ] is in general not an equality . in this example , the algebra @xmath0 has an anti - automorphism , while @xmath3 does not . the algebras @xmath0 and @xmath3 are derived equivalent . the global dimension of @xmath3 is strictly bigger than that of @xmath0 . let the algebra @xmath0 be given by the quiver @xmath810 with relations @xmath811 . this is a _ dual extension _ ( defined by c.c.xi @xcite ) of the path algebra of @xmath812 . it is a quasi - hereditary cellular algebra , and has global dimension @xmath64 . let @xmath411 be the indecomposable projective @xmath0-modules corresponding to the vertex @xmath169 , and let @xmath813 be the direct sum of three indecomposable complexes @xmath814 , @xmath815 and @xmath816 , where @xmath817 $ ] and , for each @xmath818 , the complex @xmath819 is the complex @xmath820 with @xmath116 in degree @xmath363 . then @xmath813 is a tilting complex , inducing a derived equivalence between @xmath0 and the endomorphism algebra @xmath3 of @xmath813 . the algebra @xmath3 has the following quiver @xmath821 with relations @xmath822 . the algebra @xmath0 has an anti - automorphism fixing simple modules , while @xmath3 can not have such an anti - automorphism . ( if an algebra @xmath629 has such an anti - automorphism , then @xmath823 for all simple @xmath629-modules @xmath824 . this implies that , in the quiver of the algebra @xmath629 , for any two vertices @xmath746 and @xmath825 , the number of arrows from @xmath746 to @xmath825 coincides with the number of arrows in the opposite direction , from @xmath825 to @xmath746 ) . a direct calculation shows that the algebra @xmath3 has global dimension @xmath826 , which is strictly larger than @xmath827 . cellular algebras by definition have anti - automorphisms preserving simples ; hence this large and widely studied class of algebras is covered by the second invariance theorem [ thm : class with anti - automorphisms ] . [ cor : cellular ] suppose that @xmath0 and @xmath3 are derived equivalent cellular algebras over a field . then @xmath0 and @xmath3 have the same global dimension . if both @xmath0 and @xmath3 have positive dominant dimension , then their dominant dimensions are equal . in the next section , it will be shown how to use this result to compute homological dimensions of blocks of quantised schur algebras . global dimensions of classical and quantised schur algebras @xmath11 ( with @xmath5 ) have been determined by totaro @xcite and donkin @xcite . dominant dimensions of these algebras have been obtained more recently in @xcite . the aim of this section is to determine the global and dominant dimensions of all blocks of these algebras , that is , of the indecomposable algebra direct summands . to recall some basics on @xmath828-schur algebras and their blocks ( see @xcite and the references therein ) , let @xmath12 be a field of characteristic @xmath427 or @xmath829 , and @xmath828 a non - zero element in @xmath12 . let @xmath830 be the smallest integer such that @xmath831 , and set @xmath832 if no such integer exists . for a natural number @xmath833 , let @xmath834 be the symmetric group on @xmath833 letters and let @xmath835 be the associated hecke algebra that is defined by generators @xmath836 and relations @xmath837 for each composition @xmath838 of @xmath833 , that is , a sequence of @xmath161 non - negative integers summing up to @xmath833 , let @xmath839 be the associated parabolic hecke algebra that is isomorphic to @xmath840 as @xmath12-algebras . then @xmath839 naturally can be seen as a @xmath12-subalgebra of @xmath835 . the algebra @xmath839 has a trivial module @xmath12 with all @xmath841 s acting as scalar @xmath828 . let @xmath842 be the permutation module over @xmath835 that is defined as the induced module @xmath843 . the @xmath828-schur algebra @xmath844 is then defined to be the endomorphism ring @xmath845 where @xmath846 ranges over all compositions @xmath847 of @xmath833 into @xmath161 parts , where @xmath161 is any natural number . for each composition @xmath846 of @xmath833 , there is a unique associated composition @xmath848 ( called _ partition _ ) obtained by rearranging the entries of @xmath846 weakly decreasing ; the permutation module @xmath849 is isomorphic to @xmath842 and is a direct sum of the ( indecomposable ) young modules @xmath850 with multiplicities @xmath851 ( @xmath829-kostka number ) where @xmath852 ranges over all partitions of @xmath833 . these multiplicities are known to satisfy @xmath853 and @xmath854 unless @xmath855 in the dominance ordering on partitions . when @xmath828 is not a root of unity , then the @xmath828-schur algebra @xmath844 is semisimple , and thus the global dimensions of @xmath844 and its blocks are @xmath427 , and the dominant dimensions of @xmath844 and its blocks are @xmath42 . in the following , we always assume that @xmath828 is a root a unity , and therefore @xmath856 . if @xmath857 and @xmath858 is the @xmath830-adic expansion of @xmath833 , then we set @xmath859 ; if @xmath860 , @xmath861 and @xmath862 are the @xmath830-adic expansion of @xmath833 and the @xmath829-adic expansion of @xmath863 respectively , then we set @xmath864 . the global dimension of @xmath844 for @xmath865 in this case has been given by totaro @xcite for @xmath866 , that is for the classical schur algebra , and by donkin @xcite in general . a lower bound for the dominant dimension of @xmath844 has been obtained ( implicitly ) by kleshchev and nakano @xcite for @xmath866 and by donkin ( * ? ? ? * proposition 10.5 ) in general . it was shown later in @xcite that this lower bound is an upper bound , too . to determine the global and dominant dimensions of blocks of the @xmath828-schur algebras , we will use the setup of algebras with a duality . each @xmath828-schur algebra has an anti - automorphism that fixes all simple modules , and there is a block decomposition that is invariant under the involution @xmath867 where @xmath868 and @xmath702 ranges over all @xmath830-core partitions of @xmath869 . moreover , for @xmath870 , the two blocks @xmath871 of @xmath844 and @xmath872 of @xmath873 are derived equivalent if @xmath874 @xcite . chuang and rouquier have shown in @xcite , that @xmath871 and @xmath877 are derived equivalent . as all block algebras of @xmath828-schur algebras have anti - automorphisms fixing all simple modules , theorem [ thm : class with anti - automorphisms ] can be applied and we get @xmath878 . now we are going to compute the global dimension of @xmath875 by induction on @xmath885 ; we have to show that it equals @xmath886 . if @xmath887 , then the block algebra @xmath875 is semisimple ( @xcite ) , and thus @xmath888 . now we assume that @xmath889 . note that the @xmath828-schur algebra @xmath890 is of global dimension @xmath886 by theorem [ thm : global dimension of schur algebras ] , and has a block subalgebra @xmath891 . it follows that @xmath892 since all other block subalgebras of @xmath890 are @xmath893 with @xmath894 , and thus @xmath895 by induction . in terms of the cover theory introduced by rouquier @xcite , the @xmath828-schur algebra @xmath844 is a quasi - hereditary cover of the hecke algebra @xmath835 of covering degree @xmath896 by theorem [ thm : dominant dimension of schur algebras ] and @xcite , that is , @xmath844 is a @xmath896-cover , but not an @xmath830-cover of @xmath835 . the following result implies a particular property of the cover ; each block of @xmath844 is a quasi - hereditary cover of the corresponding block of @xmath835 , of the same dominant dimension . this property may be formulated as saying that the covering is uniform of covering degree @xmath897 . if @xmath887 , then @xmath871 is semisimple and has dominant dimension infinity . now we assume that @xmath889 . since @xmath828 is a root of unity , it follows that @xmath899 , and thus by theorem [ thm : dominant dimension of schur algebras ] @xmath900 note that all block algebras have anti - automorphisms fixing all simple modules . by @xcite , the block subalgebra @xmath875 of @xmath844 and the principal block subalgebra @xmath891 of @xmath890 are derived equivalent , and thus have the same dominant dimension by theorem [ thm : class with anti - automorphisms ] . therefore we only need to show @xmath901 . let @xmath61 be an idempotent in @xmath891 such that @xmath902 is a minimal faithful @xmath891-module . then @xmath903 is a block subalgebra of @xmath904 and the @xmath905-module @xmath906 is isomorphic to a direct sum of those young modules @xmath850 that belong to the block @xmath905 ( see @xcite ) . by proposition [ prop : muller characterisation ] and the inequality ( [ eqn : lower bound for dominant dimension ] ) , to finish the proof , it suffices to show : set @xmath907 and @xmath908 , which are two partitions of @xmath909 . then the young module @xmath850 belongs to the block @xmath905 and by definition @xmath910 . as a result , by mackey s decomposition theorem @xmath911 here , the first isomorphism uses the definition of permutation modules and the second one uses adjointness ; non - vanishing of the third extension space follows by identifying @xmath912 with @xmath913 and then using the known cohomology of @xmath914 . so there is a direct summand @xmath915 of @xmath916 such that @xmath917 . in this case , the young module @xmath915 must belong to the block @xmath905 , too . this proves the claim and the theorem . _ remark . _ ( 1 ) when @xmath12 has characteristic zero or bigger than the weight @xmath885 , the dominant dimension of the blocks @xmath871 have been determined in @xcite by using chuang and tan s complete description of the corresponding rouquier blocks @xcite . \(2 ) all blocks @xmath918 of the @xmath828-schur algebra @xmath844 are also stably equivalent of morita type , and hence have the same global and dominant dimensions , as well as the same representation dimension . indeed , by carefully examining the tilting complexes constructed by chuang and rouquier @xcite , we see that the induced derived equivalences are almost @xmath1-stable . however , the derived equivalences between general blocks constructed by chuang and rouquier @xcite are not almost @xmath1-stable . for instance , when @xmath919 , the group algebras of @xmath920 and of @xmath921 , respectively , each have a unique block of @xmath829-weight @xmath826 . these two blocks correspond to each other under the reflection @xmath922 of the weyl group of the affine kac - moody algebra @xmath923 . the derived equivalences constructed in @xcite , relating these two blocks , are not almost @xmath1-stable . i. assem , d. simson and a. skowronski , _ elements of the representation theory of associative algebras . _ 1 . techniques of representation theory . london mathematical society student texts , * 65*. cambridge university press , cambridge , 2006 . s. donkin , tilting modules for algebraic groups and finite dimensional algebras , in _ handbook of tilting theory _ , london mathematical society lecture note series * 332 * , cambridge university press , cambridge , 2007 . Abstract:

Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.

Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered . Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video . Paper: the lupus star forming region , recently reviewed by @xcite , lies about 150 pc from the earth @xcite , in the gould belt . it is immediately visible by inspection of optical photographs of the sky , comprising a set of largely filamentary dark clouds . based on optical extinction maps @xcite , the ` cores to disks ' spitzer legacy programme ( c2d , * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ) , has produced and analyzed infrared images of three areas : lupus i , iii , and iv . the c2d data products @xcite include : shorter - wavelength infrared array camera ( irac ) maps , used to identify and classify young stellar objects ( ysos , * ? ? ? * ) ; far - ir mips maps @xcite tracing the thermal emission of the dust component of the molecular clouds ; and ir extinction maps , based on the two micron all sky survey ( 2mass ; * ? ? ? * ) and on a combination of 2mass and irac data @xcite . in this paper , we present maps of the c2d fields in lupus , tracing the molecular hydrogen by the rotational emission of carbon monoxide ( co ) and isotopically substituted @xmath0co . the lupus complex has been extensively surveyed in the various 10 transitions of co : @xcite first mapped the lupus molecular clouds using the 1.2 m columbia telescope with 0.5 resolution to show the extent of the molecular gas in lupus and suggest a total mass of a few @xmath2 @xmath3 . improved maps in several transitions were obtained by nanten ( 2.7 resolution , but routinely undersampled ) : @xcite published @xmath4co maps of the whole complex , mostly sampled at 8 spacing , with some areas at 4 spacing ; @xmath0co 10 maps @xcite cover lupus i and iii with 8 spacing , while c@xmath5o 10 maps @xcite cover all the clouds in the complex at 2 spacing . @xcite mapped about 200 arcmin@xmath6 of lupus iv at sub - arcminute resolution and full - beam spacing in the 10 transitions of co , @xmath0co , and c@xmath5o . the @xmath0co 21 and co 43 maps presented here are the first large - scale fully sampled low-@xmath7 co maps of lupus , and the first mid-@xmath7 co maps of any kind . the large - scale structure of the lupus clouds can be traced by near - ir extinction @xcite and co 10 emission @xcite . the complex covers some 20 of galactic latitude ( about 50 pc ) . at low latitudes ( @xmath8 ) , a large mass of diffuse gas contains denser filamentary clouds ; at higher latitudes , the dense clouds ( lupus i and ii ) are more clearly separated . the evolution of the lupus clouds may have been driven by the influence of nearby ob stars @xcite . the lupus and ophiuchus molecular clouds face one another across the upper - scorpius subgroup of the scorpius - centaurus ob association ; the upper - centaurus - lupus subgroup lies on the opposite side of the lupus clouds from upper - sco . the shell around upper - sco , blown by stellar winds and a presumed supernova 1.5myr ago @xcite , borders the ne side of the lupus clouds ; on the plane of the sky , the ridge which dominates lupus i ( b228 , see below ) lies just on the trailing edge of the shell . the much older upper - cen - lup subgroup has driven an shell far beyond the lupus clouds @xcite ; it should have passed through the lupus complex some 47 myr ago , roughly consistent with the ages of t tauri stars in lupus iii and iv @xcite . lupus i ( figure [ fig - lui - opt ] ) is dominated by b228 @xcite or gf19 @xcite , a long ridge running nw se , extending over about 2 ( 5 pc ) parallel to the edge of the upper - sco shell . the molecular material appears to fall off steeply toward the center of the shell ( at the ne edge ) , but there is extensive material on the other side of the ridge . lupus iii ( figure [ fig - luiii - opt ] ) is a long ( about @xmath9 pc ) e w cloud ( gf21 , * ? ? ? * ) at the edge of the low - latitude cloud mass : at its eastern end , it curves up to the ne and breaks up into clumps ; toward the west lie two embedded ( but optically visible ) herbig ae / be stars , hr5999 ( a57 ) and the b6 hr6000 @xcite . @xcite consider lupus iii to be a cluster - forming structure with a dense head and spread - out tail , analogous to the @xmath10 oph and cha i clouds . a couple of pc north of lupus iii , there is another smaller cloud , which appears to be a separate condensation in the low - latitude gas ; we henceforth refer to this northern structure as lupus iiin . lupus iv ( figure [ fig - luiv - opt ] ) is the head of a filamentary structure running approximately e w ( gf17 , * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ) , comprising a small core , about 0.5 pc long ( e w ) , lying within a more diffuse extended cloud , about a pc across . the filament connects lupus iv to the low - latitude gas mass to the east ; @xcite describe it as a `` chain of small faint globules '' . individual dark clouds or cloud peaks have been identified by inspection of optical surveys on scales ranging from degrees ( e.g. , b228 ) to arcminutes @xcite ; these clouds are listed in table [ tab - dcs ] . near - ir extinction maps of lupus iii with a resolution of 30 @xcite have been used to identify dark cores in more detail , which were then fitted with bonnor - ebert profiles . single - pointing spectra in several molecular lines have been observed toward extinction - selected clumps : @xcite observed h@xmath11co along four lines of sight at 6 cm ( 6.6 beamwidth ) ; @xcite searched for ammonia , but did not detect it , toward two globules ( bhr120 & 140 ) ; @xcite observed @xmath0co and c@xmath5o 10 , but their 0.8 beamwidth is poorly - matched to ours ; @xcite observed a few of their lupus i cores @xcite in cs 32 and dco@xmath12 21 ( 0.7 beamwidth ) . previously identified co cores , both those observed by @xcite , and those identified from their c@xmath5o maps by @xcite , are listed in table [ tab - mcs ] . the positions of these extinction cores and c@xmath5o cores with respect to optical and @xmath0co 21 emission are shown in figures [ fig - lui - opt][fig - luiv - opt ] . of the members of the c2d small dark cloud sample mapped by ast / ro in @xmath0co 21 and co 43 @xcite , three lie within the lupus region , but outside our maps . lupus i contains a few ysos , concentrated to the b228 ridge @xcite . lupus iii contains a very dense cluster of ysos near the herbig ae / be stars , composed mainly of t tauri stars @xcite , but including the class 0 object lupus3mms @xcite . @xcite identified a population of cool stars and brown dwarfs toward lupus i and iii , which are not strongly concentrated toward the molecular clouds . the lupus iv region contains about as many ysos as the lupus i region @xcite , but they are older ( class ii / iii ) and largely found outside the molecular cloud , with the exception of one flat - spectrum yso candidate close to the cloud center . even the dispersed population is absent @xcite . lupus iv thus appears to have less ( or no ) ongoing star formation , compared to lupus i and iii . @xcite suggest that the class ii and iii ysos surrounding it represent an earlier generation of star formation ( possibly associated with the passage of the upper - cen - lup shell mentioned above ) , and that the very dense lupus iv core is poised to form new stars . the younger ysos ( class 0 , i , and flat - spectrum sources from the c2d samples , * ? ? ? * ) within the boundaries of our @xmath0co 21 maps are listed in table [ tab - yso ] , and plotted in figures [ fig - lui - opt][fig - luiv - opt ] . lupus i , iii , and iv were observed with the antarctic submillimeter telescope and remote observatory ( ast / ro , * ? ? ? * ) , during the period 2005 march november , in the 461ghz co 43 and 220ghz @xmath0co 21 transitions . the telescope , receiver , and spectrometer systems are described by @xcite : @xmath0co 21 observations used the 230ghz sis receiver , whose local oscillator system has been upgraded to use a synthesizer , frequency multiplied ( @xmath13 ) by a millitech multiplier . co 43 observations used the 450495ghz sis waveguide receiver @xcite . low - resolution acousto - optical spectrometers ( aoss , 1ghz bandwidth , 0.7mhz channel width ) were used for all observations . the large - scale maps presented in this paper were built up from multiple smaller maps ( ` submaps ' ) , mosaicked together as follows : each submap was centered on a point of a large - scale grid superimposed on the molecular cloud , the grid points separated by 24 and 12 for the 21 and 43 observations respectively . the submaps measure @xmath14 ( @xmath15 ) and @xmath16 respectively , giving substantial overlap between neighbouring 21 maps and some overlap ( one row or column of spectra ) between neighbouring 43 maps . the submaps use cell sizes of 1 and 0.5 , significantly oversampling the telescope beam ( 3.3 at 220ghz , 1.7 at 461ghz ) . the spectra are position switched , taken in batches of 4 or 5 , all of which share a reference measurement , about a degree away . the 4 or 5 source spectra are all at the same declination ( and hence at the same elevation , since ast / ro lies at the south geographic pole ) , but the reference position is the same for all spectra in a submap , and may thus differ in elevation from the source spectra by as much as a few arcminutes . the use of one reference position for each submap , however , allows the reference position to be checked for emission . each row of each submap is built up from a number of contiguous blocks of reference - sharing spectra . reference sharing increases the observing efficiency almost to that of on - the - fly mapping , but also shares one of its weaknesses : the sharing of a reference spectrum produces correlated noise in neighboring spectra , which can show up as artifacts in the map . rather than the long stripes characteristic of on - the - fly mapping , correlated noise is manifested in the ast / ro maps as short ( 4- or 5-cell ) horizontal blocks . the ast / ro observing system produces spectra calibrated onto the @xmath17 scale @xcite ; because of the unobstructed off - axis optical design of the telescope , this is essentially equivalent to @xmath18 . further reduction and processing were carried out ( using comb , the standard ast / ro data reduction programmpound / comb ] , and pdl ) . the spectra have velocity resolutions of 0.9kms@xmath1 ( @xmath0co 21 ) and 0.4kms@xmath1 ( co 43 ) ; they were checked for frequency shifts , and corrections were applied ( corrections ranged from 0 to almost 5kms@xmath1 see appendix [ app - data ] ) . linear baselines were subtracted from all spectra , along with polynomial baselines if necessary : a few percent of the 43 spectra required non - linear baseline subtraction , and almost none of the 21 spectra ( table [ tab - spectra ] ) . long - integration spectra were taken toward all reference positions , generally showing upper limits of @xmath19k ( @xmath0co 21 ) and @xmath20 k ( co 43 ) . some 21 reference positions ( for one submap in lupus i and one in lupus iii ) contained substantial emission ( @xmath21k ) , and these reference spectra were added back into all the spectra in the relevant submap . because of the overlap between submaps , there are over a thousand pointings on the sky toward which two or more spectra were measured at different times . these duplicate pointings can be used to estimate the internal consistency of the flux calibration at the telescope . distributions of the ratios of peak @xmath18 between spectra with the same pointings are shown in figure [ fig - peakratio ] for both 43 and 21 data . the typical inconsistencies between these spectra ( estimated by the standard deviation of the distributions of @xmath18 ratios ) are about 30% for co 43 data , and about 20% for @xmath0co 21 . initial map making was carried out by nearest - neighbor sampling the submap data onto one large grid , with overlapping observations co - added . each pixel of these maps corresponds directly to the spectrum observed by the telescope ; without smoothing , inconsistencies between neighbouring submaps show up as clear edges , which are much more obvious in the 43 than in the 21 data . the overlap between submaps allowed these inconsistencies in the 43 data to be checked and corrected . individual submaps with significantly different flux scales to their surroundings were identified and rescaled . these rescalings were checked visually : a submap was only rescaled if it was obviously higher or lower than its neighbours , if the measured scaling was consistent with the visual one , and if the rescaling improved the appearance of the map when it was applied . rescaling corrections of @xmath22% did not significantly improve the appearance of the map , and were not implemented . fewer than half the submaps needed correction , mostly by factors of 0.71.4 ( in line with the estimate of internal consistency given above ) , and the largest correction factor was @xmath23 . no corrections needed to be applied to the 21 data . the need to rescale probably arises from imperfect estimation of the atmospheric transparency in the calibration procedure , which works better when the atmosphere is fairly optically thin ( e.g. at 220 ghz ) than at higher opacities ( e.g. , at 461 ghz ) . the corrected 43 data ( and uncorrected 21 data ) were then gridded ( as above ) to produce final unsmoothed data cubes , which were used to generate the maps in this paper . all the quantities mapped are calculated directly from the data , without profile - fitting . for example , the line width is estimated by the ratio of integrated intensity to peak @xmath18 ( which overestimates the fwhm by about 10% if applied to a perfect gaussian line ) . sample spectra from the data cubes are shown in figures [ fig - spectra - lui][fig - spectra - luiv ] . integrated intensity maps ( figures [ fig - lui - int][fig - luiv - int ] ) , channel maps ( integrated over 2 kms@xmath1 channels , figures [ fig - lui - chan][fig - luiv - chan ] ) , and peak @xmath18 maps ( figures [ fig - lui - tmax][fig - luiv - tmax ] ) were all produced by bessel smoothing ( e.g. * ? ? ? * ) , which gives the ` most fair ' representation of the sky as observed by a single - dish telescope . however , if significant emission extends to the edge of the map , this technique tends to produce a roll - off of emission in the outermost pixels of the map , and this effect is visible in some of the lupus maps . the effective telescope diameter was picked to balance resolution against noise : 1.5 m for the 21 maps , and 1.2 m for the 43 , yielding overall beam sizes of 3.8 and 2.3 , respectively . maps of the velocity centroid ( figures [ fig - lui - vcen][fig - luiv - vcen ] ) and line width ( figures [ fig - lui - lwid][fig - luiv - lwid ] ) use both unsmoothed data ( in grayscale ) and gaussian - smoothed data ( contours ) , with gaussian fwhms of 5 ( 21 ) and 5.75 ( 43 ) yielding overall beams of 6 in both transitions . the nominal pointing accuracy of ast / ro is about 1 , but comparison of the @xmath0co 21 map of lupus iv with the optical extinction structure ( see figure [ fig - luiv - opt ] ) suggests a systematic offset in declination . discrepancies of similar magnitude can be seen in other ast / ro data from 2005 @xcite . the lupus iv maps have therefore all been shifted southwards by 1.5 . the submillimeter map is well correlated with the millimeter - wave one , and so it has been shifted as well . there is no evidence of similar systematic shifts in the lupus i or lupus iii data . the publicly available data cubes _ do not _ have this shift applied to them . @xcite estimated c@xmath5o 10 optical depths in the range 0.10.5 toward extinction peaks , implying that @xmath0co 21 will no longer be optically thin in dense parts of the lupus clouds . maps of @xmath0co 21 peak @xmath18 follow the extinction maps of @xcite better than maps of integrated intensity do , suggesting widespread breakdown of the optically thin approximation . the maximum peak @xmath18 toward lupus i and iv is about 3.5k in each map , implying a minimum excitation temperature , @xmath24 , of 8k ; the peak @xmath18 in lupus iii reaches 5k near the bright stars , so @xmath25k in this area . @xcite adopted 13k for their analysis of @xmath0co 10 toward lupus i. a comparison of the lower @xmath0co contours to the most recent c2d extinction maps suggests that excitation temperatures of 810 k will reproduce the extinction - traced column density quite well . while higher excitation temperatures are not ruled out by the molecular line data , they would lead to lower column density estimates which would be less compatible with estimates from extinction , which is probably the least biased estimator of the true column density @xcite . gas masses are estimated from the @xmath0co 21 data as follows : the ratio of the peak @xmath18 to the maximum possible brightness temperature ( for assumed @xmath24 ) yields an estimate of the peak optical depth @xmath26 ; this is multiplied by the line width to estimate @xmath27 , which is proportional to the column density of @xmath0co ( @xmath28 , appendix [ app - co ] ) . @xmath28 is converted to a total gas column density by assuming conversions between @xmath28 and extinction @xmath29 ( see below ) , and between @xmath29 and the column density of hydrogen ( @xmath30@xmath31 , * ? ? ? assuming a distance of 150pc , the total gas mass enclosed in a 1arcmin@xmath6 pixel is then calculated . the relationship between @xmath0co column density and extinction can be expressed as @xmath32 @xmath33 , with the extinction threshold @xmath34 reflecting the minimum column density required for the presence of @xmath0co . the most commonly used parameters come from a study of @xmath10 oph by ( * ? ? ? * flw ) : @xmath35@xmath31 @xmath36 , @xmath37mag ; other studies ( e.g. * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ) have found values of @xmath38 in the range 2.22.7 , and extinction thresholds of 01.6 mag . recently , a comprehensive study of the perseus complex @xcite found @xmath39@xmath31 @xmath36 @xmath40mag overall , and @xmath41@xmath31 @xmath36 , @xmath42mag toward the west end of the complex ( pwe ) , comprising several dark clouds , which is likely to be the best analog to the lupus clouds . estimated masses of the lupus clouds above @xmath29 thresholds of 2 and 3 mag are given in table [ tab - mass ] , along with the mean and dispersion of the line widths of material with @xmath43 . ( the line width distribution for @xmath44 is very similar , varying only by about 0.1kms@xmath1 . ) masses have been calculated for @xmath45k and for three @xmath0co - to-@xmath29 relations : pwe , perseus , and flw . the quoted mass is the estimate using @xmath46k and pwe , and the positive and negative errors give the full range of mass estimates . other estimates of mass and line width from the literature are also tabulated . previous isotopically substituted co results relied , directly or indirectly , on the older ratio of @xmath47 to @xmath29 ( @xmath48@xmath31 , * ? ? ? * ) , and have been rescaled to use the same ratio as in this work . the extinction mass of lupus iii has also been rescaled to assume a distance of 150pc instead of the 200pc used by @xcite and @xcite . the masses of lupus i , iii ( including lupus iiin ) and iv are estimated to be 280 , 150 , and 80 @xmath49 respectively ( for @xmath43 ) . the extinction mass of lupus i ( 251 @xmath49 ) is similar to the @xmath0co 21 estimate ; those of lupus iii and iv are significantly greater ( 250 and 120 @xmath49 ) , but still consistent with the @xmath0co 21 error range . this suggests that the lupus complex has spatial variations in the @xmath0co - to-@xmath29 ratio , as perseus does @xcite . by contrast , the @xmath0co 10 mass estimate toward lupus i is 880 @xmath49 @xcite . the @xmath0co 10 map covers a much larger area than ours ( almost 10deg@xmath6 ) and includes significant emission to the se and sw of our map boundaries . within the confines of the @xmath0co21 map , we estimate that the @xmath0co 10 mass should be 600700 @xmath49 , still about 50% more than the upper limit of our mass range . a similar discrepancy was reported by @xcite , whose mass estimate for lupus ii is about a factor of 3 lower than that of @xcite ; but their mass estimate for lupus iv is quite similar to ours . possible reasons for the discrepancies include the undersampling of the nanten maps ( which will tend to overestimate the area of structures ) and differences in the calibration of the two telescopes . @xcite measured only 240@xmath49 toward lupus i in c@xmath5o 10 , which is much closer to our estimate . the additional mass in the @xmath0co 10 map might comprise tenuous gas in which the 21 transition is not fully excited , and whose column density is low enough for it not to be detectable in c@xmath5o 10 . the @xmath0co 10 mass estimate toward lupus iii ( 220 @xmath49 ) is consistent with our data and close to the extinction result , while the c@xmath5o 10 estimates toward lupus iii and iiin ( 80 and 5 @xmath49 ) are much lower . the average line widths for the lupus clouds ( table [ tab - mass ] and * ? ? ? * ) have been deconvolved by subtracting the aos channel width in quadrature , and , at 1.52.7 kms@xmath1 , are broader than the @xmath0co 10 widths reported at emission peaks by @xcite , much broader than the 0.9 kms@xmath1 given by @xcite as the typical line width , and also broader than the c@xmath5o 10 line widths toward individual cores ( table [ tab - mcs ] ) . c@xmath5o 10 is expected to display narrower lines than @xmath0co 21 , since the more optically thin transition arises mainly from the denser gas in the center of the cores , which generally has a lower velocity dispersion . it is harder to see why there should be a discrepancy between @xmath0co 10 and 21 line widths . however , the 10 measurements are taken from two spectra extracted from the map , so the data are insufficient to investigate the disagreement . despite these differences , the various line width measurements follow the same pattern : lupus i and iii have quite similar line widths , lupus iiin has broader lines and lupus iv narrower . based on the line widths of @xmath0co 21 and the velocity gradients observed toward the clouds , it is clear that they are gravitationally unbound ( although their general filamentary shape makes the standard formula for virial mass hard to apply ) . lupus iv , however , may be marginally bound due to its high column density , narrow lines and low velocity gradients : the lower limit to its virial mass is estimated to be @xmath50140@xmath49 , while the upper limit to the mass derived from the @xmath0co 21 map is @xmath50150@xmath49 . @xcite found almost all of the dense cores that they identified in c@xmath5o 10 to be gravitationally unbound ; the greater line widths in @xmath0co 21 reinforce this conclusion . because of their small areal coverage , concentrating on @xmath0co 21 emission peaks , the co 43 maps do not provide the same extensive overview of the clouds . the 43 map of lupus i , however , covers most of the b228 ridge . throughout most of the ridge , the peak @xmath18 lies between 1 and 2k , corresponding to excitation temperatures of 79k ( assuming that the co emission is optically thick throughout , with a filling factor of unity ) . the ends of the ridge may be warmer , with peak @xmath18 of 34k implying excitation temperatures of 1012k . the 43 maps of lupus iii and iiin show the majority of the gas to be similar to the ridge in lupus i , with @xmath51k . within the main lupus iii cloud there are two maxima : one with peak @xmath18 of 4k ( @xmath52k ) , while the other peaks at 9k . this latter one appears very compact , and so its excitation temperature may be significantly higher than the 18k minimum implied by its peak @xmath18 . the 43 map of lupus iv covers only the very center of the cloud , with peak @xmath18 of 34k ( @xmath531012k ) . towards the b228 ridge , maps of extinction @xcite , peak @xmath18 ( figure [ fig - lui - tmax ] ) , and integrated intensity ( figure [ fig - lui - int ] ) are not well correlated . the extinction map is the most robust estimator of column density @xcite : it shows a very strong peak in the middle of the ridge ( dc 338.8 + 16.5 ) , slightly less to the se ( 339.2 + 16.1 ) , and a broad low plateau to the nw ( 338.7 + 17.5 ) . the @xmath0co 21 peak @xmath18 map has similar peaks toward all three dark clouds , while the co 43 peak @xmath18 map shows no significant peak toward 338.8 + 16.5 in the center . the integrated intensity map is very different from the extinction map , with the strongest emission in the nw followed by 339.2 + 16.1 in the se , and 338.8 + 16.5 comparatively weak in the center ( hardly appearing in the co 43 integrated intensity map ) . previous molecular line studies have found a velocity gradient of about 0.3 kms@xmath1pc@xmath1 along the b228 ridge @xcite , but the channel and velocity maps ( figures [ fig - lui - chan ] and [ fig - lui - vcen ] ) show very little evidence of a smooth velocity gradient along the ridge . rather , the two large clumps at the nw and se end of the ridge have velocities that differ by about 3 kms@xmath1 , while the ridge between them lies at an intermediate velocity . on the other hand , a velocity gradient across the center of the ridge shows up very clearly in both 21 and 43 maps : the gradient of about 1 kms@xmath1pc@xmath1 is quite strong , compared not only to previously reported gradients in this cloud , but also to the gradients of 0.10.4 kms@xmath1pc@xmath1 found in areas of taurus @xcite . the gradient is smooth and coherent over the whole of this region an extent of more than 1 pc and appears quite linear , which would be consistent with solid - body rotation around the long axis of the filament @xcite . a coherent pattern in this region may also be seen in the line width maps ( figure [ fig - lui - lwid ] ) , which show an increase in line width toward the leading ( ne ) edge of the ridge . there is no sign of a velocity gradient across the nw half of b228 , which suggests that the nw part of the ridge may be distinct from the center . one of the peaks in the center of the ridge , dc 3388 + 165 - 5 , is associated with iras 15398 - 3359 : this class 0 yso @xcite has a compact ( @xmath501 ) molecular outflow with a dynamical timescale of about 2kyr @xcite . it lies about 0.5 pc behind the steep edge of the ridge , in the e w elongated core that forms the southern half of dc 338.8 + 16.5 , and coincides with local maxima in integrated co 43 emission ( figure [ fig - lui - int ] ) , in peak @xmath18 of both transitions ( fig [ fig - lui - tmax ] ) , and in co 43 line width ( figure [ fig - lui - lwid ] ) . at the se end of the ridge , the ne spur of dc 339.2 + 16.1 is blueshifted from the ridge , while the rest of the clump is at about the same velocity , suggesting that the spur might be a separate cloud superposed on the ridge . @xcite identified four optical extinction peaks in this clump : dc 3392 + 161 - 1 to -4 . they associated peak 1 with iras 154203408/ht lup , a ctts @xcite , which is optically visible as a nebulous patch between peaks 1 , 2 and 3 in fig [ fig - lui - opt ] . the other 3 ` starless ' peaks were observed in cs 32 and dco@xmath12 21 @xcite : all three have @xmath17(cs)@xmath54 k ; dco@xmath12 was only detected ( with @xmath17(dco@xmath12)@xmath55 k ) toward peaks 3 and 4 . dco@xmath12 is a high - density tracer , and its presence toward peaks 3 and 4 along the ridgeline , and absence from peak 2 at the start of the ne extension , suggest that , even in this complex structure , dense gas is concentrated to the ridge . the co 43 data , with better spatial and velocity resolution , show additional structure in this clump : a patch of strong emission close to dc 3392 + 161 - 4 , about 10 across , is blueshifted by about 1 kms@xmath1 with respect to the main ridge structure , leaving a cavity in the emission at ambient velocity . molecular outflow is a possible explanation , but since there is no obvious red lobe , this would require the yso to lie behind the cloud . blue asymmetries in molecular lines can be caused by infall , but @xcite searched unsuccessfully for signs of infall toward dc 3392 + 161 - 4 . the parsec - scale ring - shaped structure to the sw of b228 is not covered by the co 43 map however , its @xmath0co 21 emission looks quite similar to that seen in the bulk of the ridge , and the detection of dco@xmath12 toward the dense core embedded in the se edge of the ring suggests a significant amount of dense gas . the structure may also have a strong velocity gradient : the channel maps ( figure [ fig - lui - chan ] ) show two complementary semicircular structures in adjacent channels , i.e. separated by about 2kms@xmath1 , equivalent to a velocity gradient of at least 1 kms@xmath1pc@xmath1 . in the line width map ( figure [ fig - lui - lwid ] ) , the redder nw side of the structure has somewhat broader lines . @xcite observed an extinction core at the se edge of the ring : they found no signs of infall , but both cs 32 and dco@xmath12 21 are stronger in this core than in any of the cores observed in b228 . @xcite found a ring - shaped structure in extinction in lupus iii , with a diameter of about 5 , which they interpret as the remnants of the molecular cloud that formed the nearby cluster of young stars . by contrast , this structure is larger ( 20 ) and is not associated with a known cluster . co emission toward lupus iii in both transitions is dominated by a compact source in the west of the cloud , close to core f identified by @xcite . proceeding from e to w are : core f ; the compact co source ( slightly blueshifted from the bulk of the cloud ) ; the hae / be stars hr5999 and 6000 ; and further @xmath0co 21 emission extending e w . this latter emission shows no particular sign of the ring structure found in extinction by @xcite , probably because the central void is smaller than the 220ghz beam . there is a significant velocity gradient across this area , of about 2 kms@xmath1pc@xmath1 , getting redder to the west , which is not simply due to the blueshifted emission of the compact source to the east . to the east of the compact source , extinction cores a e @xcite blend together at this resolution : the integrated intensity map ( fig [ fig - luiii - int ] ) shows two e w spurs off the emission peak , the northern containing cores c and d , and the southern containing e. further east still , the northern spur continues to core b , while a lies just ne of dc 3397 + 92 - 3 . the strongest h@xmath0co@xmath12 emission in this area ( @xmath21 kkms@xmath1 ) is found toward core e ; core d , with about half the h@xmath0co@xmath12 emission , contains the class 0 yso lupus 3 mms @xcite . lupus iiin , the small ( @xmath56 pc ) cloud core lying a few pc n of lupus iii , shows surprisingly complex structure : @xmath0co 21 channel and velocity maps ( figures [ fig - luiii - chan ] and [ fig - luiii - vcen ] ) show the core to be lying in a larger ( @xmath57 pc ) structure , elongated se nw , with a significant velocity change over the long axis . the velocity gradient is dominated by a sudden change just se of the cloud core , also seen as a sharp edge in the reddest 21 channel map . the e w elongated core of lupus iv has 3 peaks along its length : the central and western ones correspond to the extinction peak which reaches @xmath58 mag . the peaks are most obvious in the @xmath0co 21 channel maps ( figure [ fig - luiv - chan ] ) ; the peak @xmath18 map ( figure [ fig - luiv - tmax ] ) shows them with much lower contrast than the extinction maps as the @xmath0co transition is optically thick ( @xmath58 mag corresponds to @xmath59810 ) . @xcite found the @xmath0co 10 line to be optically thick as well , saturating with respect to 100 ir emission . the eastern peak has broader lines yielding similar integrated intensity ( figure [ fig - luiv - int ] ) ; at finer velocity resolution , these lines are found to be double peaked @xcite . although there is quite strong co 43 emission throughout the core , and the velocity structure of the 43 emission is similar to that of @xmath0co 21 , the integrated 43 emission is concentrated toward the e and w condensations only . two elongated structures running ne of the core are also visible in the co 43 peak @xmath18 map . the strong velocity gradients seen in lupus i and iii are absent from lupus iv . some velocity structure is evident : the central condensation in the core and the two elongated ne structures are blueshifted ( by 12 kms@xmath1 ) compared to the e and w condensations . @xcite reported significant velocity structure in the e w direction , but our velocity maps show that this e w structure is not found throughout the cloud . co 43 emission from the lupus clouds can be compared to that of @xmath0co 21 by gaussian smoothing the co 43 map and plotting the integrated intensities ( figure [ fig-4321-int ] ) and peak @xmath18 ( figure [ fig-4321-peak ] ) against one another , point - by - point . the peak @xmath18 comparison is noisier than that of integrated intensity , and is only shown for lupus i and iii , which have stronger emission . the large 43 map of lupus i provides an overview of the bulk of the molecular gas . clusters of points close to the origins of the integrated intensity and peak @xmath18 plots reflect the noise levels in the maps . the majority of the data are somewhat correlated , occupying regions of the plots bounded by ( 43)/(21)@xmath60 ( both plots ) , @xmath61kkms@xmath1(integrated intensity ) , and @xmath62k ( peak ) . the 43 emission is effectively saturated , while the @xmath0co 21 emission takes a wide range of values . this suggests that even regions of quite low column density contain sufficient dense gas to emit optically - thick co 43 radiation ( the critical density of co 43 is of order @xmath2@xmath63 , but see sec . [ sec - disc - bulk ] ) . another population of molecular gas can be identified toward lupus i : its @xmath0co 21 peak @xmath18 is similar to that of the bulk population , while its co 43 peak @xmath18 is greater ( @xmath64k ) . this suggests that the gas is warmer , but not denser than the bulk of the cloud . the integrated intensities of the transitions , however , are well correlated ; this probably arises from increased line widths in both transitions , and thus from increased velocity dispersion in the gas . inspection of the maps of integrated intensity , peak @xmath18 and line width toward lupus i ( figures [ fig - lui - int ] , [ fig - lui - tmax ] , [ fig - lui - lwid ] ) shows that this component , with enhanced integrated intensity , peak co 43 @xmath18 and line width , is found in the nw end of b228 . the much smaller co 43 maps toward lupus iii , iiin , and iv provide fewer data . however , two components can still be identified in lupus iii : one component consistent with the lupus i bulk population , and the other with stronger emission . in contrast to its counterpart in lupus i , both integrated intensity and peak @xmath18 of the brighter component are well correlated . this brighter component constitutes the compact peak close to the hae / be stars in lupus iii . heating by the nearby stars could increase the peak @xmath18 and hence the integrated intensities of both transitions , without a significant change in the line width . the molecular gas in lupus iiin and iv occupies a similar region of the integrated intensity plot to the bulk population of lupus i , suggesting broadly similar physical conditions . some positions show significant co 43 emission without @xmath0co 21 : the spectra toward one of these positions are shown in figure [ fig - spectra - lui ] , and the integrated intensity and peak @xmath18plots show that this occurs in all the clouds . the combination of strong co 43 emission and weak or absent @xmath0co 21 implies warm gas with low column density ; since the co 43 map areas were chosen to cover @xmath0co 21 peaks , there may be more of this population outside our 43 maps . spectra toward specific cores have been measured by nanten and the swedish - eso submillimeter telescope ( sest ) : @xcite list the c@xmath5o 10 line parameters for the spectrum at the peak of each dense core identified from their map , and @xcite list parameters for both @xmath0co and c@xmath5o transitions toward extinction - selected cores . because the ast / ro maps are fully sampled , it is possible to obtain equivalent spectra ( albeit with a beamwidth of 3.3 , compared to the 2.8 nanten beam , and sest s 0.8 beam ) and compare the peak @xmath18 ( figure [ fig - cotrans - peak ] ) and integrated intensities ( figure [ fig - cotrans - int ] ) . the peak @xmath18 in co 43 and @xmath0co 21 toward most of the cores lie in the same region of the plot as the bulk component of molecular gas described above . four cores are clearly brighter than the rest : the two identified in lupus iii are both associated with the bright compact source , the one in lupus i lies at the se end of b228 , and the one in lupus iv is in the middle of the central core . the majority of the extinction cores have @xmath0co 21/10 peak @xmath18 ratios in the range 0.30.7 , inconsistent with the 0.72 expected from lte ( appendix [ app - co ] ) . this could be caused by beam - dilution compared to the sub - arcminute sest beam ( but see below ) . the exception ( one of the lupus iii cores associated with the bright compact source ) has a @xmath18 ratio of almost 3 : it may be large enough not to suffer beam dilution , and warm enough to be close to the high - temperature line ratio limit . while the lupus i and iii cores are well mixed in the plot , the lupus iv cores have rather low line ratios . there is no particular reason for them to be more beam diluted , so the lower line ratio may reflect a lower temperature . the plot of @xmath0co 21 peak @xmath18 against that of c@xmath5o 10 does not show any clear separation between the extinction and c@xmath5o core samples . this is surprising , since the c@xmath5o cores observed by nanten should suffer almost as much beam dilution as the ast / ro data , compared to the extinction - selected cores observed by sest . the line ratios of the cores lie mainly between unity and @xmath65 ; correcting for the factor - of-2 @xmath18 discrepancy estimated above , this suggests line ratios of about 26 , in line with lte estimates for c@xmath5o optical depths of 0.10.5 @xcite . the co 43 and @xmath0co 21 integrated intensities of the cores are more scattered , but the high-@xmath18 cores in lupus iii also have the highest integrated intensities . in contrast , the high-@xmath18 cores in lupus i and iv have more average integrated intensity , suggesting that the increased @xmath18 ( and hence temperature and/or density ) is not accompanied by increased line width . the two more cores in lupus i with large @xmath0co 21 integrated intensity also lie in the se of b228 . the ratios of the two @xmath0co transitions ( 21/10 , for the extinction - selected cores only ) lie between about 0.7 and 1.5 ( with a few between 1.5 and 3 ) , which is consistent with our expectations from lte , but not with the peak @xmath18ratios above . line parameters were estimated from the sest data by fitting gaussian line profiles @xcite , in contrast to the ast / ro and nanten data , for which integrated intensity and peak @xmath18 were measured directly , and the line width estimated by the ratio . this difference in analysis could cause a systematic discrepancy , with the sest analysis yielding lower @xmath18 and broader line widths . the cores with higher ratios ( 1.53 ) are all in lupus i or iii , but are scattered throughout the clouds . ratios of @xmath0co 21 to c@xmath5o 10 integrated intensity are around 36 for the c@xmath5o - selected cores observed with nanten ( consistent with the peak @xmath18 ratios above ) , but the same ratios toward extinction cores are generally higher . these high ratios generally arise from rather low c@xmath5o 10 integrated intensities ( @xmath66 kkms@xmath1 ) . the yso population of lupus is dominated by class ii and iii objects @xcite , but younger objects are also found there . the class 0/i / f sources identified by @xcite lying within the @xmath0co 21 maps are listed in table [ tab - yso ] , together with the 21 line parameters toward them and , where applicable , co 43 parameters ; two objects that have been identified as background galaxies @xcite are excluded . spectra toward the ysos are shown in figure [ fig - spectra - yso ] : all 21 spectra are pointed within 0.6 of the yso position , and all 43 spectra are within 0.25 . spectra toward some ysos do not show any significant emission : values of @xmath18 below @xmath67k ( in either transition ) should be treated as noise . of the 4 ysos in lupus iii with very low or non - existent 21 emission , @xcite estimate 3 to have ages of order 100myr . the rest of the ysos have line widths similar to those of the surrounding molecular gas . this does not rule out the presence of line wings due to outflow : the class 0 source lupus 3 mms has quite average line widths in both transitions , but the spectra themselves clearly show wings . the flat - spectrum source j154506.3341738 ( in lupus i ) has broader - than - average lines ; nebulosity prevented it from being measured in the optical by @xcite . the estimates of column density , and hence mass , derived above assumed a blanket temperature of @xmath68k rather than the 13k assumed by @xcite for lupus i and the 1217k estimated toward lupus iv by @xcite , both based on optically thick co 10 emission . 8k is the minimum excitation temperature consistent with the peak @xmath0co 21 @xmath18 seen toward the majority of the gas in lupus i , iii , and iv , and with the peak co 43 @xmath18 over most of the b228 ridge . adopting excitation temperatures close to the minimum implies assumptions of optical thickness , lte , and a filling factor close to unity , but is required for consistency with the extinction maps @xcite : the @xmath69 and @xmath18(@xmath0co 21)@xmath70k contours are quite similar . this implies @xmath71k for both pwe and flw @xmath0co - to-@xmath29 relations , although it does allow a higher @xmath24 toward lupus i for the perseus @xmath0co - to-@xmath29 parameters . the gas temperature estimate is consistent with estimates for many dark clouds . @xcite , using @xmath0co and c@xmath5o 10 transitions , estimated the excitation temperatures of their sample of dense cores in lupus to lie in the range 715k , with the majority of good estimates being colder than 10k ; @xcite estimated gas temperatures toward a large sample of small dark clouds from co 21 , and found that the majority were colder than 10k . models of cold dark clouds yield dust temperatures @xmath7210k at the center @xcite . while the dust temperature is higher toward the cloud surface , gas temperatures are lower than dust temperatures for low column and volume densities ( e.g. , * ? ? ? * ) , so the @xmath0co 21 and co 43 transitions need not be dominated by the cloud centers . the co 10 estimates mentioned above are likely to be dominated by the cloud surfaces , which may be warmer than those of the majority of dark clouds due to external heating by the nearby ob association . the peak co 43 @xmath18 toward lupus iv implies a @xmath24 of 1012k , compared to @xmath73k from @xmath0co 21 . this may reflect a combination of external heating , as suggested by @xcite , with high enough density to couple the gas and dust temperatures more effectively than in lupus i or iii . the column density of h@xmath11 throughout most of the b228 ridge is within a factor of 2 of @xmath74 @xmath31@xcite . the width of the ridge on the sky is about 10 , or 0.4 pc ; if b228 is assumed to be a filamentary cloud , with a similar depth , the average volume density @xmath75 is a few @xmath76 @xmath63 . this is close to the critical density @xmath77 of the 21 transitions of co and its isotopologues , supporting the assumption of lte used throughout this work , but an order of magnitude lower than the critical density of co 43 ( a few @xmath2@xmath63 , appendix [ app - co ] ) . @xcite found that significant emission in many transitions could arise from gas with volume density more than an order of magnitude lower than @xmath77 ( although co was not included in that study ) , but the similarity between the excitation temperatures of @xmath0co 21 and co 43 suggests thermalized emission , and thus a volume density close to @xmath77 . the line emission is pervasive , which argues against its arising from cores or a high - density center of the ridge . however , if the bulk of the ridge material were taken to be close to the critical density of co 43 , the depth of the ridge along the line of sight would be an order of magnitude lower than its width in the plane of the sky , which seems implausible . it is more likely that the co 43 emission arises from a small fraction of dense gas found in clumps throughout the molecular cloud ; or from a thin warm shell around the outside of the cloud ; or that subthermal emission from the bulk of the molecular gas can account for the co 43 lines seen throughout the cloud . the latter possibility , in particular , may be checked by modelling the emission . @xcite estimated the optical depth of c@xmath5o 10 toward their dark cloud sample to lie in the range 0.10.5 by comparing the @xmath0co and c@xmath5o lines , and assuming an abundance ratio of 5.5 . a large fraction of their cores had line ratios in excess of 5.5 , inconsistent with their assumed isotopologue ratio ; however , ratios up to 8 are possible ( appendix [ app - co ] ) . @xcite estimated somewhat lower optical depths toward their c@xmath5o cores , assuming @xmath78k ; at @xmath46k , their estimated optical depth range becomes quite consistent with that of @xcite . the @xmath0co 10 optical depth toward the cloud cores is likely to range from 0.5 up to 24 , depending on the abundance ratio . @xcite estimated volume densities of a few @xmath2 @xmath63 for the dense cores they identified in lupus iii . if such densities are widespread among the dense cores in lupus , the co 43 transition is close to lte , and it becomes possible to estimate the expected value of @xmath79 toward the cores . at @xmath46k , the high - column - density limit of the ratio ( both transitions optically thick ) is @xmath500.4 ; as the optical depth of @xmath0co becomes moderate , the ratio increases toward unity . however , at low optical depths , co 43 may no longer be thermalized , making this estimate invalid . most of the cloud cores have 43/21 ratios clustered around 0.5 ( figure [ fig - cotrans - peak ] ) , with a few more at unity or above , and one over 1.5 . it is difficult to achieve a line ratio significantly above unity under lte : even at low optical depth , the temperature would need to be at least 20k . the central condensation in the b228 ridge ( 338.8 + 16.5 ) has high extinction , moderate peak @xmath18 and integrated @xmath18 in @xmath0co 21 , and co 43 emission quite similar to the bulk of the cloud . the line width is also quite similar to that of the bulk cloud , so the enhancement in @xmath0co 21 is largely due to the increased peak @xmath18 . elevated gas temperature would likely show up in the co 43 emission , so the increased @xmath18 is largely due to the increased column density as the @xmath0co 21 transition becomes optically thick . this dense cloud seems to have more in common with the bulk material around it than it does with the emission peak to the nw , having similar temperature and line width . it is also associated with two embedded ysos , including a known outflow source . the strong , coherent velocity gradient seen north and east of 338.8 + 16.5 runs perpendicular to the leading edge of the ridge ( i.e. , in the direction of the shell s expansion ) ; the leading edge ( i.e. , toward the center of the shell ) has a greater line width than the gas behind it . it is difficult to rule out temperature and optical - depth effects combining to mimic a velocity gradient , but similar patterns are seen in both @xmath0co 21 and co 43 maps : a truly optically thin tracer is required to confirm the gradient . if the apparent gradient truly reflects the kinematics of the gas , the total change in velocity across the ridge is about 1kms@xmath1 , or half the line width . however , the change in velocity across a jeans length ( around 0.1 pc for these clouds ) is only about 0.1kms@xmath1 , which is unlikely to add significant support against collapse . indeed , 338.8 + 16.5 seems to be part of this velocity field , and contains a known class 0 yso . the integrated intensity maximum at the nw end of b228 is due to the combination of enhanced peak @xmath18 and broader lines . throughout this area , the peak co 43 @xmath18 is @xmath80k , implying a gas temperature of at least 10k . although the 43 emission probably does not sample the whole of the gas column , there is supporting evidence for a warmer temperature : the _ spitzer _ ir maps @xcite show this end of the filament to be bluer than the central part , with strong 24 emission ( see also * ? ? ? * ) , which could be due to a higher dust temperature . no class 0/i / f ysos are found in the northern part of the ridge , and only one class iii @xcite , so there are no obvious internal heating sources . the nearby upper - sco ob subgroup lies to the ne of lupus i , but is unlikely to be causing the heating , since no similar effect is to be found in the center of the ridge . at the se end , the picture is complex : the extinction and peak @xmath18 for both transitions are high at the se end of 339.2 + 16.1 , while line width and integrated intensity peak further nw . the strong enhancement of peak co 43 @xmath18 at the se end suggests increased temperature as well as column density . the associated ysos all lie to the nw in this area , so internal heating seems unlikely . the emission from the upper - sco shell lies at a similar velocity ( 39kms@xmath1 , * ? ? ? * ) to the lupus clouds , consistent with their being in contact with one another , and lupus i being dynamically affected by the shell . if such an interaction is going on , the combination of continuity and conservation of momentum require that the sum of pressure and momentum flux is conserved by the interaction . the limitations of both molecular and atomic data make it impossible to look for clear diagnostics of interaction between the shell and ridge , but some rough estimates can be made . for both phases , @xmath81 where @xmath82 for , and 340 for h@xmath11 . based on the data @xcite , this quantity may be estimated to be of order @xmath83@xmath63k , about 90% of which is the momentum flux component due to the expansion velocity of the shell ( 10kms@xmath1 , * ? ? ? @xmath84 for the molecular gas in lupus i is also around @xmath83@xmath63k , but is approximately evenly divided between pressure and momentum flux ( due to velocity gradients ) . the rough similarity in this sum between the and molecular gas is consistent with interaction between them . if the shell is indeed affecting lupus i , it is likely doing so through the momentum flux of its expansion . this transfer of momentum could be causing the velocity gradient across the b228 ridge ( in the direction of the shell s expansion ) ; this process could be analogous to the ` streamers ' in the ophiuchus complex @xcite . the enhanced line width at the nw end of b228 and along the leading edge of the ridge ( implying increased pressure in the molecular gas ) is also consistent with the effect of the shell . more detailed studies of both and molecular gas may support the idea of lupus i being affected by the upper - sco shell : better estimates of the volume density of h@xmath11 and higher - resolution maps of are required . the brightest part of lupus iii near hr5999 and 6000 was mapped by @xcite in the millimeter - wave continuum , c@xmath5o 10 and h@xmath0co@xmath12 10 , all with higher resolution than the ast / ro data . the c@xmath5o emission peak coincides with the co peak in our maps , and extends to the east , with another e w elongation a few arcminutes to the north . the continuum map , together with a near - ir extinction map @xcite , shows the same southern e w structure extending further east , while the northern structure breaks up into two clumps , the denser western one containing a class 0 protostar ( lupus 3 mms ) . in the h@xmath0co@xmath12 map , there is no emission at the co peak ; the emission peaks strongly to the east in the southern e w structure , while the clumps in the northern structure show up as smaller peaks . @xcite suggest that the lack of h@xmath0co@xmath12 emission at the co peak can be accounted for by a long path length through gas with volume density significantly lower than the critical density ( @xmath85@xmath63 for h@xmath0co@xmath12 ) . they estimate a column density of @xmath86@xmath31 , equivalent to @xmath29 of about 13 mag , which is consistent with the extinction maps @xcite . the peak @xmath18 in co 43 ( about 9k ) implies @xmath87 k , while the 6k peak @xmath18 of @xmath0co 21 only requires @xmath88 k. compared to the rest of the lupus clouds , where the co 43 and @xmath0co 21 excitation temperatures are quite similar , this is a significant discrepancy . it could be explained by the co peak being compact , as suggested by the co 43 peak @xmath18 map , so that the @xmath0co 21 measurement is beam - diluted . alternatively , the co 43 could be tracing an outer shell heated by the hae / be stars . however , the @xmath0co 21 emission is also optically thick ( for @xmath89k , @xmath29 of 13 mag implies an optical depth of about 8) , and so will trace similar material . these temperature estimates tend to support the argument that the gas is too warm for depletion of h@xmath0co@xmath12 to explain the lack of emission toward the co peak @xcite , although the estimates are unlikely to apply to the center of the clump . the strong co 43 emission implies that the transition is thermalized , so a significant amount of the gas in the clump must have volume density @xmath90@xmath63 . while @xcite derived an average volume density of @xmath2@xmath63 , there must be enough significantly denser gas to thermalize the co 43 line , but not enough to excite the h@xmath0co@xmath12 10 transition . in projection , lupus iii lies far away from any part of sco - cen @xcite , in contrast to lupus i and lupus iv ( discussed below ) , so the hae / be stars probably influence it far more than the ob associations . however , there is evidence for lupus iii being further away than lupus i and iv , possibly as much as 50 pc ( e.g. * ? ? ? * ) . if this is the case , then lupus iii could lie behind sco - cen , and could be affected by either or both of upper - sco and upper - cen - lup . the large line widths seen toward lupus iiin could be caused by external influence in the same way as the broader lines seen toward lupus i. the peak @xmath18 in co 43 toward lupus iv of about 4k , implying @xmath91 k , occurs around the outside of the extinction peaks , which have peak @xmath18 around 3k ( @xmath25k ) . this suggests that the outside of the clump is significantly externally heated . the @xmath0co 21 peak @xmath18 implies @xmath92k , but even this measure is unlikely to sample the extinction maxima properly , since it will be dominated by the outer layers of the structure . the co 43 temperature estimates are in line with those seen at the nw end of b228 , where lupus i seems to be strongly affected by upper - sco . lupus iv is on the opposite side of the lupus complex to lupus i , upper - sco and its shell @xcite , but faces the upper - cen - lup subgroup , which lies to the w and sw . @xcite suggested that lupus iv was shaped by the influences of both subgroups , and noted that some of the velocity gradients they saw in lupus iv were along the vector toward upper - cen - lup . much of the enhancement in the peak co 43 @xmath18 lies on the s and w sides of the extinction peaks , which is consistent with a picture of external heating by the radiation field from upper - cen - lup . there is , however , no nearby shell , the upper - cen - lup shell having passed the lupus clouds long ago @xcite . if interaction with the shell causes the enhanced line width at the nw end of b228 , the lack of any such interaction in lupus iv would be consistent with its rather low line widths . fully sampled degree - scale maps of the @xmath0co 21 emission toward the lupus i , iii , and iv clouds trace the column density and temperature of the gas , the transition becoming optically thick in the cloud cores . the peak @xmath18 is well correlated with the near - ir extinction @xcite , and a comparison of the two suggests that the bulk of the molecular gas in lupus has a temperature of 810k , rather than the 1017k generally adopted elsewhere ( e.g. * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? this estimate is fairly robust to changes in the relationship between @xmath0co column density and @xmath29 . estimates of the cloud masses from the @xmath0co maps are reasonably consistent with those derived from extinction mapping . the differences between these estimates vary greatly from cloud to cloud , and suggest that there may be significant spatial variation in the @xmath0co - to-@xmath29 relationship , as found in the perseus complex @xcite . the line widths of @xmath0co 21 toward the clouds are higher than previous estimates @xcite , around 2kms@xmath1 , with lupus iiin rather broad and lupus iv rather narrow . fully sampled co 43 maps covering most of lupus i and small regions of lupus iii and iv trace dense gas : the peak @xmath18 generally indicates excitation temperatures quite close to those of @xmath0co 21 , and hence that the transition is largely thermalized . this suggests that the volume density @xmath93@xmath63 , although modelling will be required to ascertain the required density . co 43 emission is pervasive toward lupus i ( the map of which covers a large area ) , implying that this dense gas is found either throughout or all around the outside of the cloud , although it may comprise a fairly small fraction of the cloud mass . the physical conditions of the molecular gas vary along the b228 ridge in lupus i. at the nw end , the gas has broader lines and probably higher temperature than in the bulk of the cloud ; the column density is not particularly high and there is only one class iii yso . in the center of the ridge , the dark cloud 338.8 + 16.5 is associated with recent star formation @xcite ; in this area a coherent velocity gradient of about 1kms@xmath1pc@xmath1 runs across the ridge . the se end of the ridge is complex , with ysos , enhanced line width and integrated intensity on the nw side , and column density ( and possibly temperature ) peaking to the se . the enhanced line widths and velocity gradient in b228 are consistent with a dynamical interaction between lupus i and the shell around the upper - sco subgroup of sco - cen @xcite . to the north of lupus iii , the small cloud lupus iiin has similar characteristics to the bulk of the other clouds , albeit with broader lines and significant velocity structure . lupus iii itself contains a compact co peak which is probably heated by the nearby hae / be stars hr5999 and 6000 . the gas in this clump contains sufficiently dense gas to thermalize the co 43 transition ( @xmath94@xmath63 ) , but not to thermalize the h@xmath0co@xmath12 transition mapped by @xcite , which would require @xmath95@xmath63 . the rest of lupus iii seems to have quite similar physical conditions to those in the rest of the clouds , and shows no particular sign of being affected by the nearby ob subgroups . lupus iv contains peaks of very high column density @xcite associated with slightly warmer gas temperatures ( 1012k ) . these temperatures are estimated from the optically - thick co 43 transition , which is strongest around the extinction cores , suggesting significant external heating . the average line width of @xmath0co 21 , however , is significantly lower than those of lupus i and iii . lupus iv faces the upper - cen - lup subgroup of sco - cen and @xcite suggested that it is influenced by the ob stars ; the upper - cen - lup shell passed by the lupus clouds a few myr ago , so lupus iv is more likely to be affected by the radiation field from the ob stars . despite the basic similarities in their physical conditions , the three clouds have significant differences : lupus i appears to be strongly affected by external thermal and dynamical influences from the nearby upper - sco ob association , and does not display widespread star formation . lupus iii shows no sign of external influence parts of the cloud are heated internally by its own young stars . lupus iiin seems entirely quiescent , yet has a large average line width . lupus iv has the greatest column density and the narrowest average line width , has almost no star formation as yet , and may be heated externally by the upper - cen - lup ob association . a detailed spatial comparison of co and extinction maps will yield more accurate estimates of the physical conditions of the lupus clouds , as well as mapping the variation in the @xmath0co - to-@xmath29 ratio . mapping of additional co transitions is crucial to the understanding of the clouds : more optically - thin lines ( c@xmath5o and even @xmath96 ) are particularly important . maps of the upper - sco shell with comparable resolution to the lupus maps are required to look for more definitive signs of interaction between the shell and the molecular clouds . more sophisticated radiative transfer calculations are beyond the scope of this work , but are required to use the co 43 emission as a proper constraint on the physical conditions of the gas , and hence to understand the structure of the lupus clouds and how they are affected by the local environment . we thank neal evans , fernando comern , bruno mern , eric mamajek , and tracy huard for valuable discussions , and the many people who helped get ast / ro ready for the 2005 observing season , particularly jacob kooi and craig kulesa . christina hammock kept the liquid helium flowing through the winter . we thank her , and all the south pole station staff , for their work . we thank the anonymous referee , whose comments have improved this work . ast / ro was supported by the national science foundation , under nsf opp ant-0441756 . nfht was also supported by the university of exeter dvc ( resources ) discretionary fund and by the european commission ( grant mirg - ct-2006 - 044961 ) . this work has made use of : nasa s astrophysics data system ; the simbad database operated at cds , strasbourg ; and the _ skyview _ facility at nasa s goddard space flight center . _ facilities : _ . because the aos backends are analog devices , laser mode hopping causes shifts in their frequency calibration . a number of such shifts occurred over the nine - month period during which these data were taken . the fundamental frequency calibration for each spectrometer was obtained once , by connecting a frequency synthesizer to the if input of the aos to obtain the aos channel width and the channel number of a fiducial frequency . the frequency scale thus defined was used for all data in this paper , but some corrections had to be made . the change in channel width caused by a mode - hop is negligible , but the entire spectrum is offset by a few channels . the frequency shifts were tracked with a number of fiducials . each aos includes a comb generator which is usually used to obtain several frequency calibration scans per hour , giving excellent frequency tracking . however , the comb generator failed during 2005 , so other frequency standards had to be used . for the co 43 observations , the mesospheric co 43 line is so strong that it can be picked up without a switched measurement . so the ` sky ' spectra , used to estimate the sky temperature for calibration , show the line at an antenna velocity close to zero . the mesospheric co abundance has a strong seasonal variation , and became so weak at the end of the austral winter ( around september ) that it could no longer be seen in the sky spectra . finally , repeated spectra were taken toward the compact region ngc 3576 . this source has velocity structure on the scale of the ast / ro beam , so pointing uncertainties translate into velocity uncertainties . these three fiducials were combined to track the frequency scale . the majority of @xmath0co 21 spectra were corrected by 13kms@xmath1 , and some were corrected by up to 5kms@xmath1 . about 90% of the co 43 spectra were corrected by @xmath97kms@xmath1 , with the remainder corrected by 3.9kms@xmath1 . frequency shifts also show up as inconsistencies in the maps . the 43 observations showed no obvious inconsistencies , but some shifts had to be applied to the @xmath0co 21 data : channel maps of lupus i showed that data taken in 2005 november had a significant uncorrected frequency shift compared to earlier , better - calibrated data . in addition , the long - integration spectrum toward one of the reference positions with significant 21 emission was shifted by about half a channel with respect to the map spectra into which it was added . this was not corrected , because the facility for combining spectra in comb only handles integer - channel shifts , and the effect of the shift is negligible , even in the channel maps . the co and @xmath0co data in this work are analyzed under the assumption of lte ( i.e. , the excitation temperature , @xmath24 , and gas kinetic temperature , @xmath98 , are the same ) . for the two transitions considered in this work , equation ( 14.46 ) of @xcite yields @xmath99 for co 43 ( neglecting the cosmic microwave background term ) , and @xmath100 for @xmath0co 21 . these equations are correct if the transitions are optically thick , and completely fill the beam ; otherwise they underestimate @xmath24 . in lupus , the gas is cold enough ( @xmath101 ) that @xmath18 is significantly different from @xmath24 . the column density in the lower level of the @xmath0co 21 transition is given by @xmath102 and this can be converted to the total column density of @xmath0co by correcting for the partition function : @xmath103 ranges from 2.1 to 2.3 for @xmath24 of 710k . in lte , the ratio of @xmath0co 21 to 10 emission depends only on temperature . if both transitions are optically thick , the ratio is simply the ratio of brightness temperatures at different frequencies for a given @xmath24 , and will range from 0.7 ( at 7k ) to unity ( at high temperature ) . in the optically thin case , this ratio is multiplied by the ratio of optical depths , which also depends on @xmath24 via the partition function : this ratio ranges from 1 to 2 between 6k and 15k , with a high - temperature limit of 3 . the 21/10 line ratio should therefore range from 0.7 to about 2 in lupus . the ratio of @xmath0co 21 optical depth to c@xmath5o 10 optical depth is just the ratio of @xmath0co 21/10 optical depths , multiplied by the @xmath104 abundance ratio : the @xmath105 isotope ratio is @xmath106 in the local ism @xcite , but the double ratio @xmath104 is not as well known . combining the solar @xmath107 ratio of 500 @xcite with the local ism @xmath105 ratio yields @xmath108 , but @xcite point out that @xmath105 and @xmath107 should track one another , being similarly dependent on star formation history , and so a solar ratio ( @xmath109 , * ? ? ? * ) may be more appropriate . thus the ratio of optical depths should fall in the range of 4 to about 16 . the ratio of @xmath0co 21 emission to c@xmath5o 10 , however , is complicated by the fact that the c@xmath5o transition is likely to be fairly optically thin , while the @xmath0co transition will have moderate to high optical depth . this will tend to reduce the ratio : conditions in lupus are likely to yield emission ratios as low as 24 . below a critical volume density @xmath77 , lte fails ( @xmath110 ) . the critical density itself depends on physical conditions : the effective spontaneous emission rate @xmath111 is reduced at high optical depth , yielding a lower @xmath77 , and collisional transition rates are temperature - dependent . in the optically thin limit , @xmath77(co43 ) varies from @xmath112 @xmath63 at 40 k to @xmath113 @xmath63 at 10 k @xcite ; the critical densities of co 10 and 21 transitions are a few hundred and a few thousand @xmath63 @xcite . llllccccl 337.9 + 16.4 & 3379 + 164 & lu1 & & 15 39 37 & 34 46 30 & lm & y & fs342 + 337.6 + 16.4 & & & & 15 38 21 & 34 59 17 & hmstg & & fs341 + 338.2 + 16.4 & 3382 + 164 & lu4 & & 15 40 35 & 34 40 19 & lm & n & + 338.8 + 16.5 & 3388 + 165 - 2 & lu6 & & 15 42 19 & 33 50 59 & lm & n & b228 + & 3388 + 165 - 3 & lu8 & & 15 42 40 & 33 52 01 & lm & n & b228 + & 3388 + 165 - 4 & lu7 & sl 12 & 15 42 43 & 34 09 15 & lm & y & b228 + & 3388 + 165 - 5 & b228 & & 15 43 01 & 34 08 48 & lm & y & b228 + & 3388 + 165 - 6 & lu9 & & 15 43 18 & 34 13 30 & lm & n & b228 + 338.7 + 17.5 & & & & 15 39 01 & 33 27 38 & hmstg & & b228 + 339.0 + 15.8 & & lu12 & & 15 45 34 & 34 40 53 & vmf & & + 339.2 + 16.1 & 3392 + 161 - 1 & lu10 & & 15 44 54 & 34 17 33 & lm & y & b228 + & 3392 + 161 - 2 & & & 15 45 12 & 34 13 21 & lm & n & b228 + & 3392 + 161 - 3 & & & 15 45 15 & 34 20 43 & lm & n & b228 + & 3392 + 161 - 4 & & sl 13 & 15 45 29 & 34 24 40 & lm & n & fs349 , b228 + & & lu2 & & 15 39 56 & 34 42 50 & vmf & & + & & lu3 & & 15 40 10 & 33 40 07 & vmf & & b228 + & & lu5 & & 15 42 03 & 33 46 33 & vmf & & b228 + 340.7 + 9.7 & & & & 16 11 53 & 38 03 48 & hmstg & & lu iiin + 340.9 + 9.2 & & & & 16 13 57 & 38 16 40 & hmstg & & bhr134 + 340.6 + 9.0 & & & & 16 14 03 & 38 39 04 & hmstg & & + 340.2 + 9.0 & 3402 + 90 - 1 & lu34 & & 16 11 23 & 39 01 33 & lm & pm & + & 3402 + 90 - 2 & lu36 & & 16 11 37 & 38 58 21 & lm & pm & + & 3402 + 90 - 3 & lu35 & & 16 11 45 & 39 01 39 & lm & pm & + 339.7 + 9.2 & 3397 + 92 - 1 & & sl 14 & 16 09 42 & 39 09 28 & lm & y & + & 3397 + 92 - 2 & & & 16 10 07 & 39 03 47 & lm & y & + & 3397 + 92 - 3 & lu32 & & 16 10 23 & 39 10 48 & lm & y & + 339.4 + 9.5 & 3394 + 95 & lu30 & & 16 07 49 & 39 12 04 & lm & n & + & & lu31 & & 16 09 08 & 39 03 55 & vmf & & + & & lu33 & & 16 10 27 & 39 05 18 & vmf & & + 336.4 + 8.2 & 3364 + 82 - 1 & lu23 & & 16 00 53 & 42 04 08 & lm & n & + 336.6 + 7.8 & & & & 16 02 49 & 42 13 41 & hmstg & & bhr120 + 336.7 + 8.2 & 3364 + 82 - 2 & & & 16 01 26 & 41 53 06 & lm & n & + 336.7 + 7.8 & & & & 16 03 15 & 42 06 27 & hmstg & & + 336.9 + 8.3 & 3369 + 83 & lu25 & sl 7 & 16 02 31 & 41 39 48 & lm & n & + 336.9 + 7.8 & & lu26 & & 16 04 10 & 42 00 40 & vmf & & + & & lu24 & & 16 00 18 & 42 03 47 & vmf & & + llcccccccccccccccccl 337.6 + 16.4 & & 15 38 29 & 35 02 14 & & & & 2.1 & 4.4 & 2.1 & 0.4 & 0.7 & 1.3 & & & & & & & + 338.7 + 17.5 & & 15 39 17 & 33 30 06 & 2.3 & 6.2 & 2.8 & 2.4 & 6.2 & 2.6 & 0.6 & 0.8 & 1.6 & & & & & & & + 337.9 + 16.5 & & 15 39 24 & 34 45 39 & & & & 1.9 & 3.4 & 1.8 & 2.5 & 1.5 & 0.6 & & & & & & & + 338.1 + 16.7 & & 15 39 25 & 34 27 33 & & & & 1.9 & 2.7 & 1.4 & 1.0 & 0.9 & 0.9 & & & & & & & + & lu1 & 15 39 28 & 34 46 22 & & & & 1.9 & 3.4 & 1.8 & & & & 4.7 & 3.7 & 0.8 & 2.1 & 1.2 & 0.5 & + & lu2 & 15 39 56 & 34 42 50 & & & & 2.0 & 3.0 & 1.5 & & & & 4.6 & 3.3 & 0.7 & 1.9 & 1.0 & 0.5 & + & lu3 & 15 40 10 & 33 40 07 & 1.8 & 4.5 & 2.5 & 1.8 & 3.0 & 1.6 & & & & 5.5 & 9.9 & 1.7 & 0.5 & 0.8 & 1.6 & + 338.8 + 17.2 & & 15 40 14 & 33 38 41 & 2.0 & 5.0 & 2.5 & 2.4 & 5.7 & 2.4 & 0.5 & 0.8 & 1.3 & & & & & & & + & lu4 & 15 40 32 & 34 39 40 & & & & 2.3 & 5.0 & 2.2 & & & & 3.3 & 2.9 & 0.8 & 1.2 & 0.6 & 0.5 & + & lu5 & 15 42 03 & 33 46 33 & 1.9 & 4.3 & 2.2 & 1.5 & 4.0 & 2.7 & & & & 3.0 & 4.7 & 1.5 & 0.7 & 0.5 & 0.7 & + & lu6 & 15 42 04 & 33 50 36 & 1.4 & 2.5 & 1.8 & 2.1 & 5.2 & 2.4 & & & & 1.9 & 1.9 & 0.9 & 0.5 & 0.4 & 0.8 & + & lu7 & 15 42 24 & 34 09 02 & 1.8 & 3.3 & 1.8 & 2.9 & 5.3 & 1.9 & & & & 4.0 & 3.6 & 0.9 & 1.3 & 1.1 & 0.8 & + & lu8 & 15 42 35 & 33 52 50 & 1.7 & 4.6 & 2.7 & 2.5 & 6.0 & 2.4 & & & & 4.5 & 6.2 & 1.3 & 1.1 & 0.8 & 0.7 & + 338.8 + 16.5 & & 15 42 35 & 34 08 58 & 1.6 & 2.8 & 1.8 & 2.8 & 7.2 & 2.6 & 1.9 & 2.2 & 1.2 & & & & & & & + 339.0 + 16.7 & & 15 42 48 & 33 53 56 & 1.5 & 4.0 & 2.7 & 2.3 & 6.6 & 2.8 & 1.4 & 1.6 & 1.1 & & & & & & & + & b228 & 15 43 02 & 34 09 06 & 1.8 & 3.3 & 1.9 & 3.0 & 5.2 & 1.7 & & & & 5.2 & 5.9 & 1.1 & 0.8 & 0.8 & 1.0 & + & lu9 & 15 43 10 & 34 13 50 & 1.6 & 2.3 & 1.5 & 2.4 & 4.4 & 1.8 & & & & 4.2 & 3.6 & 0.8 & 0.9 & 0.4 & 0.4 & + 339.1 + 16.1 & & 15 44 59 & 34 18 08 & 2.2 & 5.8 & 2.6 & 3.0 & 9.1 & 3.1 & 1.0 & 1.5 & 1.1 & & & & & & & + & lu10 & 15 45 06 & 34 17 39 & 2.2 & 6.3 & 2.8 & 2.9 & 8.6 & 3.0 & & & & 3.4 & 3.3 & 0.9 & 0.8 & 0.5 & 0.6 & + 339.1 + 15.9 & & 15 45 30 & 34 25 51 & 3.2 & 4.9 & 1.5 & 2.9 & 5.9 & 2.0 & 2.3 & 1.5 & 0.7 & & & & & & & + & lu30 & 16 07 51 & 39 11 12 & & & & 2.4 & 4.9 & 2.1 & & & & 3.2 & 2.2 & 0.7 & 0.3 & 0.2 & 0.7 & + 339.6 + 9.3 & & 16 08 53 & 39 06 26 & 9.0 & 15.5 & 1.7 & 5.6 & 13.1 & 2.3 & 1.9 & 2.4 & 1.2 & & & & & & & + & lu31 & 16 09 08 & 39 03 55 & 4.2 & 8.0 & 1.9 & 3.3 & 8.0 & 2.4 & & & & 1.5 & 1.8 & 1.1 & 0.4 & 0.2 & 0.4 & + & lu32 & 16 10 19 & 39 12 16 & 2.3 & 3.0 & 1.3 & 2.2 & 5.2 & 2.3 & & & & 4.3 & 3.9 & 0.9 & 0.3 & 0.2 & 0.7 & + & lu33 & 16 10 27 & 39 05 18 & 2.5 & 3.7 & 1.5 & 2.1 & 2.9 & 1.4 & & & & 5.1 & 4.1 & 0.8 & 1.2 & 0.7 & 0.6 & + & lu34 & 16 11 16 & 39 02 38 & & & & 0.9 & 1.9 & 2.1 & & & & 1.0 & 1.0 & 1.0 & 0.5 & 0.2 & 0.4 & + & lu36 & 16 11 28 & 39 00 21 & & & & 1.3 & 3.2 & 2.5 & & & & 4.6 & 3.7 & 0.8 & 1.2 & 0.7 & 0.5 & + & lu35 & 16 11 36 & 39 04 18 & & & & 1.4 & 2.7 & 2.0 & & & & 4.4 & 2.8 & 0.6 & 0.6 & 0.5 & 0.7 & + 340.7 + 9.7 & & 16 11 58 & 38 04 23 & 1.5 & 6.0 & 4.1 & 2.3 & 5.4 & 2.4 & 0.5 & 0.9 & 1.8 & & & & & & & lu iii n + & lu24 & 16 00 18 & 42 03 47 & & & & 1.4 & 2.6 & 1.8 & & & & 4.1 & 2.4 & 0.6 & 0.8 & 0.3 & 0.4 & + & lu23 & 16 00 57 & 42 04 55 & & & & 1.6 & 2.9 & 1.8 & & & & 4.2 & 3.8 & 0.9 & 1.2 & 0.7 & 0.6 & + 336.4 + 8.2 & & 16 00 57 & 42 03 16 & & & & 2.1 & 3.7 & 1.7 & 2.1 & 1.4 & 0.5 & & & & & & & + 336.7 + 8.2 & & 16 01 46 & 41 52 34 & 3.6 & 5.4 & 1.5 & 3.4 & 6.5 & 1.9 & 2.0 & 2.0 & 0.8 & & & & & & & + 336.9 + 8.2 & & 16 02 34 & 41 41 54 & 2.2 & 2.9 & 1.3 & 2.0 & 3.7 & 1.8 & 1.5 & 1.3 & 0.8 & & & & & & & + & lu25 & 16 02 36 & 41 42 26 & 1.2 & 1.2 & 1.0 & 1.9 & 3.3 & 1.7 & & & & 4.9 & 2.5 & 0.5 & 0.6 & 0.2 & 0.4 & + 336.7 + 7.8 & & 16 03 12 & 42 07 43 & & & & 1.8 & 3.7 & 2.0 & 0.7 & 0.6 & 0.9 & & & & & & & + 336.8 + 7.9 & & 16 03 37 & 42 00 55 & & & & 1.5 & 3.1 & 2.1 & 0.7 & 0.7 & 0.8 & & & & & & & + & lu26 & 16 04 10 & 42 00 40 & & & & 1.4 & 2.7 & 1.8 & & & & 5.2 & 3.8 & 0.7 & 1.1 & 0.6 & 0.5 & + llcccccccccc j154214.6341026 & & i & low & 15 42 14.6 & 34 10 26 & 1.8 & 2.2 & 1.2 & 2.5 & 4.7 & 1.9 + j154301.3340915 & iras 153983359 & 0 & & 15 43 01.3 & 34 09 15 & 4.3 & 8.2 & 1.9 & 2.8 & 4.8 & 1.7 + j154506.3341738 & & f & neb & 15 45 06.3 & 34 17 38 & 2.1 & 5.9 & 2.8 & 2.9 & 8.6 & 3.0 + j160703.9391112 & & f & ir , old & 16 07 03.9 & 39 11 12 & & & & 0.4 & 0.9 & 2.4 + j160708.6391407 & & f & v , old & 16 07 08.6 & 39 14 08 & & & & 0.6 & 1.8 & 3.2 + j160829.7390311 & sz102 & i & note & 16 08 29.7 & 39 03 11 & 2.6 & 3.4 & 1.3 & 2.7 & 6.1 & 2.2 + j160831.1385600 & & f & & 16 08 31.1 & 38 56 00 & 0.6 & 1.1 & 1.7 & 0.3 & 0.2 & 0.8 + j160846.8390207 & & i & & 16 08 46.8 & 39 02 07 & 4.2 & 7.8 & 1.9 & 2.7 & 6.0 & 2.3 + j160918.1390453 & lupus3mms & 0 & neb & 16 09 18.1 & 39 04 53 & 3.5 & 6.2 & 1.8 & 3.3 & 8.0 & 2.4 + j160934.2391513 & & f & & 16 09 34.2 & 39 15 13 & 2.3 & 4.1 & 1.8 & 1.7 & 3.8 & 2.2 + j161013.1384617 & & f & ir , old & 16 10 13.1 & 38 46 17 & & & & 0.4 & 0.6 & 1.4 + j161027.4390230 & & f & low & 16 10 27.4 & 39 02 30 & 2.6 & 4.4 & 1.7 & 1.9 & 4.5 & 2.4 + j161204.5380959 & & f & v , low & 16 12 04.5 & 38 09 59 & & & & 1.2 & 4.3 & 3.7 + j160115.6415235 & & f & neb & 16 01 15.6 & 41 52 35 & 4.5 & 6.4 & 1.4 & 3.6 & 6.2 & 1.7 + lccccc lupus i & 2.57 & 9258 & 11856 & 0 & 0 + lupus iii & 1.87 & 6740 & 8412 & 12 & 0.1 + lupus iv & 0.92 & 3300 & 3300 & 0 & 0 + lupus & 5.36 & 19298 & 23568 & 12 & 0.05 + lupus i & 0.76 & 10964 & 12067 & 939 & 8 + lupus iii n & 0.04 & 625 & 650 & 10 & 2 + lupus iii & 0.17 & 2401 & 3240 & 150 & 5 + lupus iv & 0.09 & 1225 & 1425 & 15 & 1 + lupus & 1.06 & 15215 & 17382 & 1114 & 6 + lccccc @xmath114(@xmath43 ) & @xmath115 & @xmath116 & @xmath117 & @xmath118 & @xmath119 + @xmath114(@xmath44 ) & @xmath120 & @xmath121 & @xmath122 & @xmath123 & @xmath124 + @xmath125 ( kms@xmath1 ) & 2.3 & 2.7 & 2.2 & 2.4 & 1.5 + rms @xmath126 ( kms@xmath1 ) & 0.7 & 0.9 & 0.9 & 0.9 & 0.4 + @xmath114(@xmath0co 10 ) & 880 & & & 220 & + @xmath127kms@xmath1(@xmath0co 10 ) & 1.9 & & & 1.7 & + @xmath114(@xmath0co 10 ) & & & & & @xmath128 + @xmath114(c@xmath5o 10 ) & 240 & 5 & & 80 & 160 + @xmath127kms@xmath1(c@xmath5o 10 ) & 0.61.7 & 1.8 & 1.2 & & 0.50.9 + @xmath114(@xmath43)&251 & & & 250 & 120 + co 21 emission from this work ( contours at 1 , 3 , 5 , 7 , 9kkms@xmath1 ) . annotations : dark cloud positions ( table [ tab - dcs ] ) from ( * ? ? ? * open triangles ) , ( * ? ? ? * filled triangles ) , and ( * ? ? ? * squares ) ; embedded ysos from ( * ? ? ? * star - shapes ) ; bright stars ( by name ) ; c@xmath5o 10 peaks from ( * ? ? ? * diamonds ) . filled squares denote cloud cores observed in molecular lines by @xcite . only objects within the @xmath0co map are plotted . the @xmath129 arrows are 15 long . ] co 21 and ( right ) co 43 , integrated from @xmath131 to @xmath132kms@xmath1 . @xmath0co 21 contours at 2 , 4kkms@xmath1 ( black ) and 6 , 8kkms@xmath1 ( white ) ; co 43 contours at 3 , 5 ( black ) and 7 , 9 , 11kkms@xmath1 ( white ) . the broken outline denotes the extent of the co 43 map . ] co 21 , integrated from @xmath131 to @xmath133kms@xmath1 , and ( right ) co 43 , integrated from @xmath131 to @xmath134kms@xmath1 toward lupus iii and from @xmath135 to @xmath133kms@xmath1 toward lupus iiin . contours at 2 , 4kkms@xmath1 ( black ) and 6 , 8 16kkms@xmath1 ( white ) . ] co 21 and ( right ) co 43 , integrated from @xmath136 to @xmath137kms@xmath1 . @xmath0co 21 contours at 1 , 2 , 3kkms@xmath1 ( black ) and 4 , 5 , 6 , 7kkms@xmath1 ( white ) ; co 43 contours at 3kkms@xmath1 ( black ) and 5 , 7kkms@xmath1 ( white ) . ] of ( left ) @xmath0co 21 and ( right ) co 43 toward lupus i. left : contours at 0.5 , 1k ( black ) and 1.5 , 2.5 , 3.5k ( white ) . right : contours at 1.5 , 2k ( black ) and 2.5 , 3 , 3.5 , 4k ( white ) . the broken outline denotes the extent of the co 43 map . ] co 21 and ( right ) co 43 emission toward lupus i. contours are at 5 , 5.5 , 6kms@xmath1 ( black ) and 6.5 , 7 , 7.5kms@xmath1 ( white ) . the gray scale is unsmoothed , while the contours have been smoothed with a gaussian kernel . only spectra with s / n@xmath13010 are shown . solid outlines indicate the extent of the maps , while the broken outline indicates the extent of the co 43 map . ] : @xmath0co 21 contours are at 5 , 5.5 , 6kms@xmath1 ( black ) and 7.5 , 8 , 8.5 , 9kms@xmath1 ( white ) ; co 43 contours are at 4 , 4.5,kms@xmath1 ( black ) and 7.5 , 8 , 8.5 , 9kms@xmath1 ( white ) . only spectra with s / n@xmath1305 are shown . ] co 21 and ( right ) co 43 toward lupus i. contours are at 2 , 2.4, 3.6kms@xmath1 . gray scale is unsmoothed , while contours have been smoothed with a gaussian kernel . only spectra with s / n@xmath13010 are shown . solid outlines indicate the extent of the maps , while the broken outline indicates the extent of the co 43 map . ] of co transitions for cores seen in c@xmath5o 10 . the dashed line indicates a line ratio of unity , while dotted lines trace ratios of 0.67 , 1.5 ( left ) , 0.33 , 0.67 , 1.5 , 3 ( center ) , and 0.67 , 1.5 , 3 ( right ) . symbols denote cores in lupus i ( squares ) , lupus iii / iii n ( triangles ) , and lupus iv ( diamonds ) ; filled symbols are c@xmath5o - selected cores from @xcite , and open symbols are extinction - selected cores from @xcite . ] Abstract:

Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.

Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered . Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video . Paper: in this paper we construct a generalized universal cover for a very large class of uniform spaces called _ coverable _ spaces , which includes all geodesic metric spaces ( corollary [ inner ] ) , connected and locally pathwise connected compact topological spaces ( corollary [ 0628new ] ) , and in particular peano continua ( corollary [ peano ] ) . coverable spaces also include some more pathological spaces like the topologist s sine curve ( see below ) and totally disconnected spaces ( @xcite ) . associated with this generalized universal cover is a functorial uniform space invariant called the _ deck group _ , which is related to the classical fundamental group by a natural homomorphism . three types of uniform spaces are of greatest importance : topological groups , compact topologial spaces and metric spaces . topological groups were considered in @xcite and @xcite ; the relationship to the present paper may be found in section [ topsec ] , along with a correction to bptg . for compact topological spaces , which have a unique uniform structure compatible with the topology , the deck group is a topological invariant that coincides with the fundamental group in the setting of what we will call poincar spaces ( i.e. , connected , locally pathwise connected , semilocally simply connected spaces ) . the special case of metric spaces is of particular interest . in addition to more classical examples such as the hawaiian earring and related spaces ( @xcite , @xcite , de , @xcite , @xcite , @xcite ) , generalized universal covers and fundamental groups have recently been studied in connection with gromov - hausdorff limits of riemannian manifolds ( @xcite and @xcite ) . such limits are always geodesic spaces , and hence coverable . a recent example of menguy shows that limits of riemannian manifolds with positive ricci curvature can have bad local topology ( @xcite)precisely the sort of metric spaces at which the present work is aimed . we will consider metric spaces in more detail in an upcoming paper . one of the main impediments to generalizing the classical construction of the universal cover is the traditional definition of covering map , the most important property of which is the ability to lift curves and homotopies . however , this lifting property is traditionally gained at the expense of requiring that a space and its cover be locally homeomorphic in a fairly strong way , and consequently traditional universal ( or simply connected ) covers exist _ only _ for poincar spaces . earlier work concerning systems coverings of uniform spaces ( cf . @xcite , @xcite ) was also limited by considering only traditional covers , and therefore a universal object is impossible to obtain even for basic examples such as the countable product of circles or the hawaiian earring . one may take a hint from topological groups for how to proceed . in this category , a traditional covering map is a quotient homomophism with discrete kernel . the action by the kernel is not only properly discontinuous , it is uniformly so . moreover , as we showed in @xcite , one can exploit this more uniform kind of action to define generalized covers as quotients with central kernels that are ( complete and ) prodiscrete , i.e. are inverse limits of discrete groups . these generalized covers have the lifting properties of traditional covers , but are not in general local homeomorphisms . this allows one to abandon assumptions concerning ( semi-)local simple connectivity . the kernel of the generalized universal cover is a kind of generalized fundamental group . the key to generalizing the results of @xcite is to build a group action right into the definition of generalized cover . actually doing so is , unfortunately , somewhat technical , and this was carried out by the second author in @xcite . the basic idea is to consider a kind of uniformly properly discontinuous action called a _ discrete action _ on a uniform space . inverse systems of discrete actions define _ prodiscrete actions _ that generalize the notion of the action on a topological group via a prodiscrete , central subgroup . the action by a subgroup also preserves the uniform structure ( as long as one matches the left or right action to the left or right uniformity ) ; this property is generalized by something called an isomorphic action on a uniform structure , which also broadens the notion of an isometric action on a metric space . a generalized _ cover _ of uniform spaces is defined in @xcite to be a quotient via a prodiscrete , isomorphic action . at the beginning of @xcite is a review of basic definitions and properties of uniform spaces that are used for the construction ; we will use the same notation in this paper ( see @xcite for a more in - depth discussion ) . what follows is a sketch of our construction and main results . all of these constructions involve a choice of basepoint(s ) , but basepoint choice has an impact in this setting similar to that in the traditional setting for pathwise connected spaces , and for simplicity we will save detailed discussion of basepoints for the body of the paper . for now , all functions are simply assumed to preserve some chosen basepoints ( this is particularly important for the uniqueness statements , which are only true up to choice of basepoint ) . for each uniform space @xmath0 there is an inverse system @xmath1 indexed on the collection of entourages of @xmath0 partially ordered by reverse inclusion , called the _ fundamental inverse system _ of @xmath0 . @xmath2 consists of equivalence classes of finite @xmath3-chains starting at a fixed basepoint . an @xmath3-_chain _ between points @xmath4 is an ordered set of points @xmath5 such that for all @xmath6 , @xmath7 . an @xmath3__-loop _ _ is an @xmath3-chain that starts and ends at the same point . two @xmath3-chains from @xmath8 to @xmath9 are equivalent if one can be obtained from the other through finitely many steps , each of which involves removing or adding a point , always leaving the endpoints fixed and keeping an @xmath3-chain at each stage . the collection of all equivalence classes of @xmath3-loops at the basepoint forms a group @xmath10 with respect to concatenation . this group is finitely generated when @xmath0 is compact ( theorem [ compact ] ) . when @xmath2 is provided with a natural lifted uniformity , @xmath10 acts discretely on @xmath11 by concatenating an @xmath3-loop at the beginning of an @xmath3-chain . in a sense @xmath12 detects holes in @xmath0 that are , roughly speaking , larger than @xmath3 . the restriction @xmath13 of the bonding map @xmath14 to @xmath15 preserves concatenation and produces another inverse system @xmath16 of groups and homomorphisms ; in fact these two systems form an inverse system of actions as defined in @xcite . the inverse limit of the group system consists of a group @xmath17 , called the _ deck group _ of @xmath0 , which acts prodiscretely and isomorphically on @xmath18 . observe that @xmath19 is actually a ( prodiscrete ) topological group and the homomorphisms induced on the deck group are continuous homomorphisms . however , we do not know of examples of spaces having deck groups that are abstractly , but not continuously , isomorphic . in general the projection @xmath20 may not be surjective , and hence not a cover . in fact @xmath21 may be only a single point even when @xmath0 is not . the next definition , which is central to the paper , deals with this issue . [ coverdef]let @xmath0 be a uniform space . an entourage @xmath3 such that the projection @xmath22 is surjective is called a covering entourage . a uniform space @xmath0 is called coverable if there is a uniformity base of covering entourages including @xmath23 . the collection of all such entourages is called the covering base @xmath24 . if @xmath0 is coverable then each @xmath25 is a covering map ( in the sense of @xcite ) and we refer to the projection @xmath20 as the _ universal cover of _ @xmath0 . the next theorem combines results of theorems [ 73 ] and [ 101 ] . ( induced mapping ) let @xmath26 be coverable spaces with universal covers @xmath27 and @xmath28 . if @xmath29 is uniformly continuous then there is a unique uniformly continuous function @xmath30 such that @xmath31 . moreover , 1 . if @xmath32 is a cover then @xmath33 is a uniform homeomorphism . if @xmath34 is a coverable space and @xmath35 is uniformly continuous then @xmath36 . the restriction of @xmath33 to @xmath19 in the above theorem is a homomorphism @xmath37 ( theorem [ 73 ] ) . therefore the deck group is a functorial invariant of uniform structures . in the case of compact spaces the deck group is a topological invariant ; if @xmath0 is a compact poincar space then the deck group is naturally isomorphic to the fundamental group ( corollary 0518equiv ) . for non - compact spaces the deck group need not be a topological invariant ; for example the surface of revolution @xmath38 obtained by rotating the graph of @xmath39 about the @xmath40-axis has trivial deck group even though it is homeomorphic to a standard cylinder the deck group of which is @xmath41 . the problem is that a generator of @xmath42 may be represented by a path that extends down the cusp arbitrarily far , wraps around the small cusp , and then travels back to the basepoint . this generator will therefore not be detected by any of the groups @xmath43 , where @xmath44 is the metric entourage of size @xmath45 . the deck group does indicate that the standard cylinder and @xmath38 are not _ uniformly _ homeomorphic and that @xmath38 is not uniformly semilocally simply connected . the next theorem follows from corollary [ partialstep ] and theorem [ 101 ] . ( universal property ) if @xmath0 and @xmath46 are coverable and @xmath47 is a cover then there is a unique cover @xmath48 such that @xmath49 , where @xmath50 is the universal cover of @xmath46 . with regard to the universal property it should be pointed out that , in contrast to the situation for coverable topological groups , we do not know whether the composition of covers between coverable spaces ( or uniform spaces in general ) is a cover . ( the situation for topological groups is significantly simpler because the deck group is actually a central subgroup of the universal cover and covers are simply quotient homomorphisms , making their composition easier to understand . ) recall that the composition of traditional covering maps between connected topological spaces need not be a traditional cover ( @xcite ) . we resolve this problem in the same way that it is resolved for topological spaces ( see @xcite ) : define a category whose objects are covers @xmath51 between coverable uniform spaces and whose morphisms are commutative diagrams @xmath52where @xmath53 and @xmath54 are covers and @xmath32 is uniformly continuous . it is an immediate consequence of the preceding theorem that the universal cover @xmath55 is a universal object in this category . [ universaldef]a uniform space @xmath0 is called universal if there is a base @xmath56 for the uniformity such that for any @xmath57 , @xmath58 is a uniform homeomorphism . the collection of all such uniformities is called the universal base of @xmath0 ( which always contains @xmath23 ) . if @xmath0 is coverable then @xmath21 is universal ( theorem [ xic ] ) and every universal space is coverable ( corollary [ uic ] ) . moreover , a coverable space @xmath46 is universal if and only if @xmath19 is trivial , or equivalently every @xmath3-loop is @xmath3-homotopic to the trivial loop for entourages @xmath3 in a particular basis ( corollary [ uit ] ) , a condition that is reminiscent of simply connected . the next theorem follows from theorem [ 76 ] . ( lifting ) let @xmath0 be universal , @xmath46 be coverable and @xmath47 be uniformly continuous . then there exists a unique uniformly continuous function @xmath59 such that @xmath60 , where @xmath50 is the universal cover of @xmath46 . any connected , uniformly locally pathwise connected ( see definition unidef ) , simply connected uniform space is universal in particular any compact , connected , locally pathwise connected , simply connected topological space is universal ( theorem [ 0627simply ] and corollary [ compactu ] ) . therefore we may apply the lifting theorem to paths and homotopies of paths . this allows one to define a natural mapping @xmath61 , for any coverable space @xmath0 , by lifting a loop that represents an element of the fundamental group and taking the deck transformation that takes the basepoint to the endpoint of the loop . even though the action is not discrete this mapping is well defined , and a homomorphism . there is a satisfying relationship between the two most basic algebraic properties of the map @xmath62 and topological properties of @xmath63 when @xmath0 is pathwise connected : ( 1 ) @xmath62 is injective if and only if @xmath21 is simply connected ( proposition [ inj ] ) , and ( 2 ) @xmath64 is surjective if and only if @xmath21 is pathwise connected . more precisely , for arbitrary coverable @xmath0 , the image of @xmath64 is the stabilizer in the deck group @xmath19 of the pathwise connected component of @xmath21 that contains the basepoint ( theorem [ nat ] ) . hence if @xmath21 is both pathwise connected and simply connected then the deck group and the fundamental group are isomorphic . this is true as mentioned earlier when @xmath0 is a compact poincar space and also when @xmath0 is a locally compact , pathwise connected topological group ( cf . if @xmath0 is connected and uniformly locally pathwise connected then the pathwise connected component of @xmath65 is dense in @xmath21 ( proposition [ dense ] ) and therefore @xmath21 is connected . in this case it is also true that @xmath66 is dense in @xmath19 . note that , in the case of the surface @xmath38 described above , @xmath38 is itself universal . @xmath38 is pathwise connected but not simply connected and correspondingly @xmath67 is surjective but not injective . as another example , consider the ( closed ) topologist s sine curve @xmath68 , illustrated in figure [ tsc ] with its universal cover . the deck group of @xmath69 is @xmath41 ; the action shifts the universal cover in a way similar to the action of @xmath41 on @xmath70 . note that arbitrarily fine chains may wrap around @xmath68 , while no path does . hence the deck group indicates topology where the fundamental group , which is trivial in this case , does not . finally , @xmath71 is simply connected but not pathwise connected , and correspondingly @xmath72 is injective but not surjective ( and the image of @xmath62 need not be dense in the deck group because @xmath68 is not locally pathwise connected ) . we show that if @xmath0 is coverable with uniform dimension @xmath73 in a sense due to isbell ( @xcite ) then @xmath21 has the same property ( theorem [ dimthm ] ) , and we conjecture that the the uniform dimensions of @xmath0 and @xmath65 are the same . when @xmath0 has dimension @xmath74 , we show that @xmath65 is simply connected and contains no topological circles . as a consequence the function @xmath62 is injective . we prove some results concerning dimension and coverable spaces , although it seems much more may be said . further progress may require additional work extending theorems concerning covering dimension to theorems about uniform dimension . however , this partial result is particularly useful when @xmath75 because then @xmath21 is forced to be at most one dimensional and if @xmath0 contains any non - trivial curve then the uniform dimension of @xmath76 must be exactly @xmath74 . one - dimensional metric spaces are of interest since they include , for example , planar fractals and metrized cayley graphs , as well as many familiar pathalogical examples . it is known that the fundamental group of a compact , connected , @xmath74-dimensional metrizable space embeds in an inverse limit of free groups . given this fact , it seems very likely that for appropriate choice of @xmath3 , the groups @xmath77 are finitely generated free groups when @xmath0 is compact , connected , and @xmath74-dimensional . we have verified this in some special cases ( see section [ pssec ] ) . it would be very interesting to know whether for suitable choice of @xmath3 , @xmath78 is free when @xmath0 is coverable ( or just connected ? ) of uniform dimension @xmath74 . in this paper we show that , if @xmath0 is coverable of uniform dimension @xmath79 then @xmath21 has no topological circles ( proposition [ circle ] ) . it follows that @xmath21 is simply connected and hence ( assuming @xmath0 is pathwise connected ) @xmath80 is an embedding . in general , @xmath21 may not be pathwise connected and hence @xmath62 may not be surjective , but at least in the case when @xmath0 is uniformly locally pathwise connected we know that the ( isomorphic ) image of the fundamental group is dense in the deck group . in other words , @xmath0 is a quotient via a free action of its fundamental group on a connected , simply connected , uniformly one dimensional space . we conclude with a general result about metric spaces . given a metric space @xmath81 , @xmath21 is metrizable ( proposition [ metrizable ] ) , and if @xmath0 is coverable then by definition of cover the action of @xmath19 on @xmath65 is isomorphic in the sense that there is a uniformity base for @xmath21 that is invariant with respect to @xmath19 . it is natural to ask whether there is a metric on @xmath21 with respect to which the action of @xmath19 is isometric and such that the metric on @xmath21 is the quotient metric . ( since @xmath19 is complete and acts prodiscretely , the orbits of @xmath19 are closed and hence if @xmath21 has an invariant metric there is a well defined quotient metric on @xmath0 , namely the distance between the corresponding orbits in @xmath21see @xcite , 4.4 for details on quotient metrics . ) we do not know the answer to this question in general . however , if one examines the proof in @xcite that a uniform space with a countable base possesses a compatible pseudometric , it is clear that the explicitly constructed pseudometric is invariant with respect to the action of a group @xmath82 if the entourages used in the construction are invariant . in other words , if @xmath0 is a coverable metric space then we may put a metric on @xmath21 that is invariant with respect to the action of @xmath19 . although the quotient metric on @xmath0 may not be the original , it is still uniformly equivalent to the original . this proves : if @xmath0 is a coverable metric space then @xmath0 is uniformly homeomorphic to the metric quotient @xmath83 of a universal metric space @xmath46 with respect to the isometric prodiscrete action of a group @xmath82 isomorphic to @xmath19 . note that for any entourage @xmath3,@xmath84that is , @xmath85 is the set of all pairs of points joined by an @xmath3-chain of length @xmath86 . a uniform space @xmath0 is called _ chain connected _ ( sometimes called uniformly connected ) if every uniformly continuous function from @xmath0 into a discrete uniform space is constant . [ consume]the following are equivalent : 1 . @xmath0 is chain connected 2 . for any entourage @xmath3 , @xmath87 . 3 . for any entourage @xmath3 , every pair of points in @xmath0 is joined by an @xmath3-chain . 4 . for any entourage @xmath3 and @xmath88 , @xmath89 . the equivalence of the first two conditions is proved in @xcite , 9.34the statement of 9.34 is wrong but the proof is right ! the last three are equivalent by formula ( [ ton ] ) . if @xmath0 is chain connected and @xmath47 is a uniformly continuous surjection then @xmath46 is chain connected . for a topological group @xmath82 , chain connected is equivalent to @xmath82 being locally generated ( generated by every neighborhood of the identity ) , and @xmath3-chains are the same as what we called @xmath90-chains in @xcite . if one fixes a single point @xmath8 and entourage @xmath3 in an arbitrary uniform space @xmath0 then if @xmath91 is the set of all points that can be joined to @xmath8 by a @xmath3-chain , it is easy to check that @xmath92 is both open and closed . therefore every connected uniform space is chain connected . on the other hand , the rational numbers are chain connected and totally disconnected ( see @xcite for related topics ) . [ 315system]let @xmath93 be an inverse system of sets such that each of the projections @xmath94 is surjective . then for any subsets @xmath95 of @xmath96 , @xmath97 . in particular for any @xmath86 , @xmath98 . we have @xmath99 if and only if there exists some @xmath100 such that @xmath101 and @xmath102 . since @xmath103 is surjective this is equivalent to : for some @xmath104 , @xmath105 and @xmath106 . but this is equivalent to @xmath107 . [ 41]let @xmath108 be an inverse system of chain connected uniform spaces . if each of the projections @xmath109 is surjective then @xmath110 is chain connected . for any entourage @xmath111 in @xmath0 and @xmath112 we have @xmath113 for some @xmath86 . then @xmath114 . an @xmath3-extension of a @xmath3-chain @xmath115 is an @xmath3-chain @xmath116 , where @xmath117 . two @xmath3-chains from @xmath118 to @xmath119 are said to be @xmath3-related if one is a @xmath3-extension of the other . an @xmath3-homotopy between @xmath3-chains @xmath120 and @xmath121 is a sequence @xmath122 of @xmath3-chains such that @xmath123 is @xmath3-related to @xmath124 for all @xmath125 . the number @xmath126 is called the _ length _ of the homotopy . we denote the @xmath3-homotopy class of an @xmath3-chain @xmath127 by @xmath128_{e}$ ] . now fix a basepoint @xmath129 . let @xmath2 denote the set of all @xmath3-homotopy classes of @xmath3-chains in @xmath0 starting at @xmath130 and define a function ( the endpoint map ) @xmath58 by @xmath131)=x_{n}$ ] . the proof of the next lemma is immediate . [ lemsur5]if @xmath0 is a uniform space and @xmath3 is an entourage then @xmath132 is surjective if and only if every pair in @xmath0 is joined by an @xmath3-chain ; in particular @xmath133 is surjective if @xmath0 is chain connected . the next lemma will often be used without reference . the proof is straightforward but tedious . [ lemsur2]let @xmath134 and @xmath135 be @xmath3-chains for some entourage @xmath3 in a uniform space @xmath0 . then @xmath136 and @xmath137 are @xmath3-homotopic if and only if the @xmath3-loop @xmath138 is @xmath3-homotopic to the trivial chain @xmath139 . let @xmath0 be a uniform space with entourage @xmath3 . for any entourage @xmath140 , define @xmath141 as follows : let @xmath142_{e},[\beta ] _ { e})\in d^{\ast } $ ] if and only if @xmath143_{e},[\beta ] _ { e})=([\ast = x_{0}, ... ,x_{n},y]_{e},[\ast = x_{0}, ... ,x_{n},z]_{e})\text { with } ( y , z)\in d\text{.}\ ] ] [ technical]let @xmath0 be a uniform space with entourage @xmath3 . for any entourages @xmath144 , @xmath142_{e},[\beta ] _ { e})\in d^{\ast } f^{\ast } $ ] if and only if for some @xmath145_{e}=[\ast = x_{0}, ... ,x_{n}]_{e}$ ] we have @xmath146_{e}=[\ast = x_{0}, ... ,x_{n},y]_{e}\]]@xmath147_{e}=[\ast = x_{0}, ... ,x_{n},z]_{e}\]]for some @xmath148 such that @xmath149 and @xmath150 . in particular , @xmath151_{e},[\beta ] _ { e}\in b([\gamma ] _ { e},\left ( d^{\ast } \right ) ^{2})$ ] if and only if these conditions hold with @xmath152 . the reverse implication is obvious . conversely , if @xmath142_{e},[\beta ] _ { e})\in d^{\ast } f^{\ast } $ ] then we may take @xmath153 , @xmath154 , @xmath155 and @xmath156 where @xmath157 is @xmath3-homotopic to @xmath127 and @xmath150 and @xmath149 . now @xmath137 is @xmath3-related to @xmath158 and the latter is @xmath3-homotopic to @xmath159 using the @xmath3-homotopy from @xmath127 to @xmath160 . finally , @xmath136 is @xmath3-related to @xmath161 . [ xee]let @xmath0 be a chain connected uniform space with entourage @xmath3 , and @xmath162 be the endpoint map . then 1 . @xmath133 is injective when restricted to any @xmath163-ball . 2 . for any entourage @xmath140 and @xmath151_{e}\in x_{e}$ ] , @xmath164_{e},d^{\ast } ) ) = b(\phi _ { xe}([\alpha ] _ { e}),d)\]]and @xmath165 . 3 . the collection of all @xmath141 such that @xmath140 is a base for a uniformity of @xmath2 . 4 . @xmath133 is a bi - uniformly continuous surjection with respect to this uniformity . in particular the restriction of @xmath133 to any @xmath166-ball is a uniform homeomorphism onto the corresponding @xmath167-ball . if @xmath151_{e}$ ] and @xmath168_{e}$ ] are in @xmath169_{e},e^{\ast } ) $ ] and @xmath170_{e})=\phi _ { xe}([\beta ] _ { e})$ ] then by definition of @xmath163 , @xmath136 and @xmath137 are @xmath3-homotopic . this proves the first part . for part ( 2 ) let @xmath171 ; it is obvious from the definition of @xmath133 and @xmath141 that @xmath164_{e},d^{\ast } ) ) \subset b(\phi _ { xe}([\alpha ] _ { e}),d)=b(x , d)\text{.}\]]now suppose @xmath172 and let @xmath173 . since @xmath136 is @xmath3-homotopic to @xmath174 , we have that @xmath142_{e},[\beta ] _ { e})\in d^{\ast } $ ] and @xmath175_{e},[\beta ] _ { e}))=(x , y)\text{.}\]]this implies that @xmath165 . we will now check the conditions for a uniformity base . clearly , for entourages @xmath3 and @xmath176 we have @xmath177 ( and in fact they are equal but it is not necessary to prove this ) . since @xmath167 is symmetric , so is @xmath141 . next , let @xmath176 be an entourage such that @xmath178 . suppose that @xmath142_{e},[\beta ] _ { e})\in ( f^{\ast } ) ^{2}$ ] . then for some @xmath145_{e}$ ] , @xmath179_{e},[\beta ] _ { e}\in b([\gamma ] _ { e},f^{\ast } ) $ ] . applying lemma technical we may write @xmath151_{e}=[\ast = x_{0}, ... ,x_{n},y]_{e}$ ] and @xmath180_{e}=[\ast = x_{0}, ... ,x_{n},z]_{e}$ ] with @xmath181 and hence @xmath182 . by definition @xmath142_{e},[\beta ] _ { e})\in d^{\ast } recall from @xcite that @xmath133 is bi - uniformly continuous by definition if the image or inverse image of any entourage with respect to @xmath133 is again an entourage . part ( 4 ) is now an immediate consequence of parts ( 2 ) and ( 3 ) . we can now see precisely how the choice of basepoints affect things . let @xmath183 and @xmath184 be @xmath185-chains for some entourage @xmath3 in a uniform space @xmath0 . define the concatenation of @xmath136 to @xmath137 by@xmath186 [ basepoint]let @xmath0 be a chain connected uniform space , @xmath187 , and @xmath3 be an entourage . let @xmath188 denote the space of @xmath3-homotopy classes of @xmath3-chains based at @xmath189 . let @xmath127 be any @xmath3-chain from @xmath54 to @xmath53 . there is a natural map from @xmath190 to @xmath191 defined by taking @xmath151_{e}$ ] to @xmath192_{e}$ ] , where @xmath193 is the @xmath3-chain obtained by concatenating @xmath194 to the end of @xmath127 . it is easy to check that this function is a bijection with inverse @xmath195 . for any entourage @xmath176 in @xmath0 , there are corresponding entourages @xmath196 in @xmath197 and @xmath198 in @xmath199 . now @xmath200 if and only if @xmath201 and in particular , @xmath190 and @xmath199 are uniformly homeomophic . therefore , as in the case of traditional covering space theory , the choice of basepoint @xmath130 plays only a minor and predictable role . given a basepoint @xmath130 in @xmath0 , we will always take @xmath202_{e}$ ] for the basepoint in @xmath2 . in general , for any function @xmath47 we will always suppose that @xmath32 is pointedin the sense that @xmath203 . for each chain @xmath204 in @xmath0 we denote the chain @xmath205 by @xmath206 , with similar notation for any finite sequence of chains . we will always take the uniform structure on @xmath2 to be the one given by proposition [ xee ] . if @xmath95 are entourages of @xmath26 , respectively , such that @xmath207 and @xmath127 is an @xmath3-chain then @xmath206 is an @xmath176-chain in @xmath46 . note that if @xmath208 is an @xmath3-homotopy between @xmath3-chains @xmath136 and @xmath127 then @xmath209 is an @xmath176-homotopy between @xmath210 and @xmath206 . in particular the function in the following definition is well defined ( and pointed ) . [ induced]given @xmath47 is a function between uniform spaces such that for entourages @xmath95 of @xmath26 , respectively , @xmath207 , we define @xmath211 by @xmath212_{e})=[f(\gamma ) ] _ { f}$ ] . for any entourages @xmath140 in a uniform space @xmath0 , define @xmath213 by @xmath214_{d})=[\alpha ] _ { e}$ ] . note that by definition @xmath215 , where @xmath216 is the identity , and @xmath217 for any entourages @xmath140 in a uniform space @xmath0 , @xmath218 is uniformly continuous . let @xmath219 be an entourage in @xmath2 and @xmath220 be an entourage in @xmath0 . we will need to distinguish between @xmath221 , which we will refer to as @xmath222 and @xmath223 , which we will refer to as @xmath224 . if @xmath225_{d},[\beta ] _ { d})\in g_{d}^{\ast } $ ] then by definition we can take @xmath226 and @xmath227 with @xmath228 . now @xmath229_{d},[\beta ] _ { d}))=([\alpha ] _ { e},[\beta ] _ { e})\]]and by definition @xmath142_{e},[\beta ] _ { e})\in g_{e}^{\ast } that is , @xmath230 . [ identify]let @xmath0 be a uniform space and @xmath140 be entourages . then @xmath231is a uniform homeomorphism such that the following diagram commutes:@xmath232moreover , for any entourage @xmath233 in @xmath0 , we have @xmath234 . for simplicity denote @xmath235 by @xmath236 . let @xmath237_{e}=[\alpha _ ... ,[\alpha _ { n}]_{e}\}$ ] be a @xmath166-chain in @xmath2 , where each @xmath238 ends at a point @xmath239 . then @xmath240_{d^{\ast } } ) = [ \phi _ { xe}([\ast ] _ { e}), ... ,\phi _ { xe}([\alpha _ { n}]_{e})]_{d}=[z_{0}=\ast , z_{1}, ... ,z_{n}]_{d}\text{. } \label{identifyfor}\ ] ] since @xmath241_{e},[\alpha _ { 1}]_{e})\in d^{\ast } $ ] , @xmath242_{e}=[z_{0}=\ast , z_{1}]_{e}\text{.}\]]proceeding inductively , for all @xmath6 we have that @xmath243_{e}=[z_{0}=\ast , z_{1}, ... ,z_{i}]_{e } \label{0621sequence}\]]which implies that @xmath236 is injective . given any @xmath167-chain @xmath244 we can let @xmath245 for all @xmath246 . since @xmath247 is a @xmath167-chain , @xmath248_{d}, ... ,[\alpha _ { n}]_{d}\}$ ] is a @xmath141-chain and @xmath249_{e}=[\alpha _ { 0}]_{e}, ... ,[\alpha _ { n}]_{e}]_{d^{\ast } } ) = [ z_{0}=\ast , z_{1}, ... ,z_{n}]_{d}\]]which shows that @xmath236 is surjective . by definition , @xmath250_{d^{\ast } } ) \right ) = [ z_{0}=\ast , z_{1}, ... ,z_{n}]_{e}\text{.}\]]that is , the upper triangle of the diagram commutes , and we already know that the bottom triangle does . finally , suppose that @xmath251_{e}=[\alpha _ { 0}]_{e}, ... ,[\alpha _ { n}]_{e}]_{d^{\ast } } , [ [ \ast ] _ { e}=[\beta _ { 0}]_{e}, ... ,[\beta _ { m}]_{e}]_{d^{\ast } } ) \in ( f^{\ast } ) ^{\ast } \]]where , according to formula [ 0621sequence ] we can suppose that for some @xmath252 , @xmath253 and @xmath254 for all @xmath6 . by definition this means that we can suppose that @xmath255 and @xmath256_{e},[\beta _ { n}]_{e})\in f^{\ast } $ ] . this in turn is equivalent to @xmath257 , which is equivalent to @xmath258_{e}=[\alpha _ { 0}]_{e}, ... ,[\alpha _ { n}]_{e}]_{d^{\ast } } , [ [ \ast ] _ { e}=[\beta _ { 0}]_{e}, ... ,[\beta _ { m}]_{e}]_{d^{\ast } } ) ) \in f^{\ast } \text{.}\ ] ] the preceding somewhat technical - looking proposition in fact has a very nice interpretation . essentially it identifies @xmath259 with @xmath260 by taking a @xmath141-chain of @xmath3-chains to the @xmath167-chain of their endpoints . in other words , @xmath2 and @xmath0 are locally the same ; @xmath141 and @xmath163 are really just copies of @xmath167 and @xmath3 inside @xmath261 . dealing with @xmath260 rather than @xmath262 means we are dealing with chains rather than chains of chains . at the same time , proposition [ identify ] identifies the mapping @xmath263 with the more easily understood mapping @xmath264 . with such identifications we can express the proposition as @xmath265 . this proposition is very useful because it will allow us to immediately apply results proved for @xmath133 to the more general functions @xmath266 . the next lemma illustrates this . [ chainhom]suppose that @xmath0 is a uniform space and @xmath3 is an entourage in @xmath0 such that @xmath2 is chain connected . then for any entourage @xmath176 and @xmath185-chain @xmath127 in @xmath0 , @xmath127 is @xmath3-homotopic to an @xmath176-chain . without loss of generality we can suppose that @xmath267 . since @xmath2 is chain connected , @xmath268 is surjective by lemma [ lemsur5 ] . but this means that if @xmath127 is an @xmath3-chain in @xmath0 there is some @xmath176-chain @xmath136 in @xmath0 such that @xmath151_{e}=\phi _ { ef}([\alpha ] _ { f})=[\gamma ] _ { e}$ ] . given entourages @xmath269 in @xmath0 , we have functions @xmath213 and @xmath270 with @xmath271_{d}))=[x_{0}=\ast , ... , x_{n}]_{f}=\phi _ { fd}([x_{0}=\ast , ... , x_{n}]_{d})\text{.}\]]in other words , @xmath272 and @xmath273 forms an inverse system of uniformly continuous functions having as its indexing set the set of all entourages of @xmath0 partially ordered by reverse inclusion . we will call the inverse system @xmath274 the fundamental inverse system of @xmath0 and let @xmath21 denote the inverse limit of this inverse system with the inverse limit uniformity . we will let @xmath275 be the projection ; we simply denote @xmath276 by @xmath50 . we will always choose for our basepoint @xmath130 in @xmath65 the element having as each of its coordinates the basepoint @xmath277_{e}$ ] in @xmath2 . since a uniform space is metrizable if and only if it has a countable base for its uniformity ( @xcite ) , if @xmath0 is metrizable then each @xmath2 is metrizable . we may index the fundamental system with this countable base and conclude : [ metrizable]if @xmath0 is metrizable then @xmath21 is metrizable . [ 60]let @xmath0 and @xmath46 be uniform spaces , @xmath47 be uniformly continuous , and @xmath95 be entourages in @xmath26 , respectively , such that @xmath278 . then @xmath279 is uniformly continuous and satisfies @xmath280moreover , if @xmath2 is chain connected then @xmath279 is the unique uniformly continuous function satisfying ( [ commute1 ] ) such that @xmath281_{e})=[f(\ast ) ] _ { f}$ ] . to prove @xmath279 is uniformly continuous we need only consider entourages of the form @xmath141 in @xmath282 , where @xmath283 is an entourage in @xmath46 . since @xmath32 is uniformly continuous there exists some entourage @xmath284 such that @xmath285 . let @xmath286 and @xmath287 be such that @xmath143_{e},[\beta ] _ { e})\in g^{\ast } \text{,}\]]which means by definition @xmath228 . then @xmath288and therefore @xmath289_{e},[\beta ] _ { f})=([\ast = f(x_{0}), ... ,f(x_{n}),f(y)]_{f},[\ast = f(x_{0}), ... ,f(x_{n}),f(z)]_{f})\in d^{\ast } \text{.}\]]this shows that @xmath279 is uniformly continuous . that @xmath290 is an immediate consequence of the definition . to prove the last statement suppose @xmath2 is chain connected and @xmath291 is a uniformly continuous function such that @xmath292 and @xmath293_{e})=[f(\ast ) ] _ { f}$ ] . let @xmath82 be an entourage in @xmath0 such that @xmath294 . by way of lemma chainhom it is sufficient to show that if @xmath295 is a @xmath296-chain then @xmath297_{e})=f_{ef}([\beta ] _ { f})$ ] . we will prove it by induction on @xmath86 . the case @xmath298 is given ; suppose the statement is true for @xmath299 and consider @xmath300 with @xmath301 . suppose that @xmath302_{e}):=[f(\ast ) = z_{0}, ... ,z_{m}]_{f}$ ] ; then @xmath303_{e})=\phi _ { yf}\circ f^{\prime } ( [ \ast = x_{0}, ... ,x_{n+1}]_{e})=z_{m}\text{.}\]]by the inductive hypothesis , @xmath304_{e})=f_{ef}([\alpha ] _ { e})$ ] and by definition of @xmath296 we have @xmath305_{e}),f^{\prime } ( [ \beta ] _ { e}))=(f^{\prime } ( [ \alpha ] _ { e}),f^{\prime } ( [ \beta ] _ { e}))\in f^{\ast } \]]and @xmath305_{e}),f_{ef}([\beta ] _ { e}))\in f^{\ast } \text{.}\]]in other words , both @xmath306_{e})$ ] and @xmath302_{e}))$ ] lie in @xmath307_{e},f^{\ast } ) $ ] and by proposition [ xee ] @xmath308 is injective on this ball . the fact that @xmath309_{e})=f^{\prime } ( [ \beta ] _ { e})$ ] now follows from @xmath310_{e})=f(\phi _ { xe}([\beta ] _ { e}))=\phi _ { yf}(f^{\prime } ( [ \beta ] _ { e}))\text{.}\ ] ] if @xmath0 is a uniform space and @xmath267 are entourages in @xmath0 such that @xmath311 is chain connected then @xmath14 is the unique uniformly continuous function such that @xmath312_{f})=[\ast ] _ { e}$ ] and @xmath313 . the proof of the next lemma is virtually identical to the proof of lemma 65 in @xcite ; one need only replace statements like @xmath314 with @xmath315 . let @xmath26 be uniform spaces , @xmath47 be a uniformly continuous surjection , @xmath176 be an entourage in @xmath46 and @xmath316 . let @xmath317 be an @xmath3-chain in @xmath0 and @xmath208 be an @xmath176-homotopy from the @xmath176-chain @xmath318 to another @xmath176-chain @xmath319 . then @xmath208 lifts to an @xmath3-homotopy from @xmath320 to an @xmath3-chain @xmath321 . that is , there exist an @xmath3-chain @xmath322 and an @xmath3-homotopy @xmath323 between @xmath317 and @xmath321 such that @xmath324 . [ 66]let @xmath26 be uniform spaces , @xmath47 be a uniformly continuous surjection , @xmath176 be an entourage in @xmath46 and @xmath316 . if @xmath58 is surjective and there exists a uniformly continuous function @xmath325 such that the following diagram commutes @xmath326then @xmath133 is a uniform homeomorphism . we need only show that @xmath133 is injective . equivalently we need only show that if @xmath327 is an @xmath3-loop in @xmath0 then @xmath317 is @xmath3-homotopic to the trivial loop @xmath139 . let @xmath318 , which is an @xmath176-loop in @xmath46 and @xmath328_{e}):=[h]_{f}$ ] ; by the commutativity of the diagram @xmath329_{f})=f(\phi _ { xe}([c]_{e})=f(\ast ) $ ] . in particular , @xmath330 is a loop in @xmath46 . moreover , @xmath331_{f}=\psi ( \phi _ { xe}([c]_{e}))=\psi ( \ast ) $ ] . on the other hand , @xmath332_{f}=f_{ef}([\ast ] _ { e})=\psi ( \phi _ { xe}([\ast ] _ { e}))=\psi ( \ast ) \text{. } \]]that is , @xmath331_{f}=[f(\ast ) ] _ { f}$ ] and therefore @xmath330 is @xmath176-homotopic to the trivial loop @xmath333 . now by definition , @xmath334_{f}=f_{ef}([c]_{e})=[f(x_{0}), ... ,f(x_{n})]_{f}=[f(c)]_{f}=[d]_{f}\]]and therefore @xmath335 is also @xmath176-homotopic to @xmath336_{f}$ ] . the chain lifting lemma now finishes the proof . [ 67]let @xmath0 and @xmath46 be uniform spaces with @xmath0 chain connected , @xmath29 be a surjective uniformly continuous map , @xmath176 be an entourage in @xmath46 and @xmath316 . if @xmath337 is bijective then @xmath162 is a uniform homeomorphism . note that since @xmath0 is chain connected , @xmath133 is surjective . let @xmath338 , which is uniformly continuous since @xmath339 is bi - uniformly continuous . certainly @xmath340 and @xmath341since @xmath342 is bijective we conclude that @xmath343 and the conditions of proposition [ 66 ] are satisfied , completing the proof . [ coverchain]if @xmath0 is a coverable uniform space and @xmath3 is a covering entourage in @xmath0 then @xmath2 is coverable and hence chain connected . if @xmath3 is a covering entourage then we may index the fundamental inverse system of @xmath2 using the set of all entourages @xmath219 where @xmath344 is a covering entourage in @xmath0 . then @xmath345 is surjective for all such @xmath176 . but @xmath346 is naturally identified with @xmath347 by proposition [ identify ] and therefore @xmath348 is also surjective . therefore the collection of all such @xmath219 is a covering basis for @xmath2 . it is straightforward but tedious to check that if @xmath151_{e}=[\alpha ^{\prime } ] _ { e}$ ] and @xmath168_{e}=[\beta ^{\prime } ] _ { e}$ ] then @xmath349_{e}=[\alpha ^{\prime } \ast \beta ^{\prime } ] _ { e}$ ] . for an entourage @xmath3 in a uniform space @xmath0 , we define @xmath77 to be the group of all @xmath3-homotopy classes of @xmath3-loops at @xmath130 with the group operation induced by concatenation . we will call this the @xmath3-deck group of @xmath0 . that is , given @xmath3-loops @xmath136 and @xmath137 based at @xmath130 , we let @xmath146_{e}\ast \lbrack \beta ] _ { e}:=[\alpha \ast \beta ] _ { e}\text{.% } \]]note that the identity chain is @xmath202_{e}$ ] and if @xmath350 then @xmath151_{e}^{-1}=[\alpha ^{-1}]_{e}$ ] where @xmath351 . it is easy to check that @xmath78 is in fact a group . [ compact]if @xmath0 is a compact uniform space and @xmath3 is an entourage in @xmath81 such that @xmath2 is chain connected then @xmath77 is finitely generated . let @xmath176 be an entourage in @xmath0 such that @xmath352 . since @xmath0 is compact there exists some finite @xmath176-dense set , i.e. , a set @xmath353 such that for every @xmath88 there exists some @xmath354 such that @xmath355 . we will first show that if @xmath356 is any @xmath3-chain with @xmath357 then @xmath358 is @xmath3-homotopic to an @xmath3-chain @xmath359 such that @xmath360 for all @xmath6 . by lemma [ chainhom ] we may assume that @xmath136 is in fact an @xmath176-chain . now for each @xmath361 , @xmath362 , there is some @xmath239 such that @xmath363 . we may now proceed iteratively , removing each @xmath361 and then replacing it by @xmath239 . for example , since @xmath364 , we may remove @xmath365 and still have an @xmath3-chain . since @xmath366 and @xmath367 , @xmath368 . similarly @xmath369 , so we may add @xmath370 . likewise , @xmath371 , so we may remove @xmath372 , and then @xmath373 and @xmath374 , so we may add @xmath375 . after finitely many steps we have the desired @xmath3-chain . we may suppose that @xmath376 . we now claim that @xmath77 is generated by elements of the form @xmath377_{e}\]]where @xmath378 for all @xmath6 , and for @xmath379 we have @xmath380 . we will call elements of this form minimal elements . that is , a minimal element is represented by a loop that consists of a chain made of distinct points of @xmath381 , followed by a loop ( which may be empty ) of additional distinct points of @xmath381 , followed by the initial chain in reverse order . if we prove this claim then the proof of the theorem is finished because @xmath381 , and hence the set of minimal elements , is finite . let @xmath382 be an arbitrary @xmath3-loop . we will show by induction on @xmath383 that @xmath145_{e}$ ] is a product of minimal elements . for @xmath384 the proof is trivial ; suppose it is true for @xmath385 . if all of the points @xmath239 @xmath386 are distinct then @xmath145_{e}$ ] is already a minimal element . otherwise , let @xmath387 be the smallest index such that for some @xmath388 , @xmath389 . let @xmath390we may apply the inductive hypothesis to conclude that @xmath391 _ { e}$ ] is the product of minimal elements . on the other hand , let @xmath392by construction , @xmath136 is minimal and since @xmath393 _ { e}=% \left [ \alpha \ast \beta \right ] _ { e}$ ] , the proof is finished . the following mapping is certainly well - defined . let @xmath0 be a uniform space and @xmath3 be an entourage . for each @xmath394_{e}\in \delta _ { e}(x)$ ] , define a mapping @xmath395 by @xmath396_{e})=[\lambda \ast \alpha ] _ { e}$ ] . before proceeding we will recall some notation and definitions from @xcite . let @xmath0 be a uniform space . we denote by @xmath397 the topological group of uniform homeomorphisms of @xmath0 with composition as the operation . suppose @xmath82 is a subgroup of @xmath397 . an entourage @xmath3 is called @xmath82__-invariant _ _ if @xmath398 for every @xmath399 . if @xmath0 has a uniformity base consisting of @xmath400-invariant entourages we say that @xmath82 acts isomorphically . the action of @xmath82 is said to be _ discrete _ provided there exists some entourage @xmath3 such that if @xmath401 for some @xmath88 and @xmath402 then @xmath403 must be the identity . if @xmath82 acts discretely and isomorphically on @xmath0 then the natural mapping @xmath404 is called a discrete cover . [ discrete]let @xmath0 be a uniform space and @xmath3 be an entourage . 1 . for any @xmath405 we have @xmath406 and @xmath78 is naturally isomorphic to a subgroup of @xmath407 . 2 . @xmath77 acts discretely and isomorphically on @xmath2 . 3 . if @xmath133 is surjective ( in particular if @xmath0 is chain connected ) then @xmath162 is a discrete cover with covering group @xmath77 . we have @xmath408_{e})=[\lambda _ { 1}\ast \lambda _ { 2}\ast \alpha ] _ { e}=\overline{\lambda _ { 1}\ast \lambda _ { 2}}([\alpha ] _ { e})\text{.}\]]this implies that each @xmath409 is a bijection and therefore is an element of @xmath407 , while the inclusion @xmath410 is a homomorphism . if @xmath411_{e})=[\alpha ] _ { e}$ ] for some @xmath136 , then @xmath412_{e}=[\lambda \ast \alpha ] _ { e}\ast \lbrack \alpha _ { e}]^{-1}=[\lambda \ast \alpha \ast \alpha ^{-1}]_{e}=[\lambda ] _ { e}\text{.}\]]this implies both that @xmath413 is injective and the action is free . the action of @xmath77 is free . by the very definition , for any entourage @xmath267 and all @xmath414 , @xmath415 and therefore the action is isomorphic . now suppose that @xmath416 for some @xmath417 . then @xmath418 and since @xmath133 is injective on every @xmath163-ball by proposition [ xee ] , @xmath419 . since we have shown the action is free , it follows that @xmath409 is the identity and we have shown that the action is discrete . for the third part note that by theorem 11 ( see also remark 13 ) , @xcite , we need only check first that @xmath133 is bi - uniformly continuous ( which we already know ) and second that if @xmath88 and @xmath420 are such that @xmath421 , then the preimage @xmath422 is precisely the orbit @xmath423 . for any @xmath88 , @xmath424_{e}\}\text{.}\]]now there is some @xmath3-chain @xmath425 since @xmath426 is surjective . moreover , for any @xmath62 , the endpoint of @xmath427_{e})$ ] is still @xmath40 and hence @xmath428_{e})\in \phi _ { xe}^{-1}(x)$ ] . that is , the orbit @xmath429_{e}$ ] is contained in @xmath422 . on the other hand , if @xmath137 is any other @xmath3-chain to @xmath40 and we let @xmath430 then @xmath431_{e}\in \delta _ { e}(x)$ ] and @xmath428_{e})=[\beta ] _ { e}$ ] and therefore @xmath422 is contained in the orbit @xmath432_{e}$ ] . from proposition [ identify ] we have : [ 0530cov]if @xmath0 is a uniform space then for any entourages @xmath95 in @xmath0 with @xmath267 such that @xmath433 is surjective ( in particular when @xmath2 is chain connected ) , @xmath14 is a discrete cover with covering group @xmath434 . in particular @xmath435 is a uniform homeomorphism if and only if @xmath434 is trivial . let @xmath0 be a uniform space and @xmath436 denote the restriction of @xmath14 to @xmath437 . the collection @xmath438 forms an inverse system . we denote @xmath439 by @xmath19 and call it the deck group of @xmath0 . [ chainhom2]if @xmath0 is a uniform space and @xmath3 is an entourage such that @xmath2 is chain connected then for any entourage @xmath267 , @xmath440 is surjective . according to lemma [ chainhom ] , if @xmath127 is an @xmath3-loop in @xmath0 , @xmath441 is @xmath3-homotopic to an @xmath176-chain @xmath136 . but since @xmath3-homotopy preserves endpoints , @xmath136 must also be an @xmath176-loop and by construction @xmath442_{f})=[\alpha ] _ { e}=[\gamma ] _ { e}$ ] . [ coin]let @xmath0 be a uniform space . then 1 . for any entourage @xmath3 , the group @xmath77 is discrete with respect to both the topology of uniform convergence and the topology induced by the inclusion of @xmath77 in @xmath2 . 2 . the group @xmath19 is prodiscrete with respect to the inverse limit topology , which is the same as the topology induced by the inclusion in @xmath21 . since @xmath77 acts discretely ( theorem [ discrete ] ) it follows from corollary 32 of @xcite that @xmath77 is discrete with respect to the topology of uniform convergence . on the other hand , since @xmath133 is injective on @xmath443 and @xmath444 , @xmath445 , which shows that @xmath77 is a discrete subset of @xmath133 . the second part now follows from the definitions . before we consider coverable spaces in more detail we need to revisit the issue of basepoints . note that the construction of @xmath21 is dependent on the initial choice of basepoint , and in fact @xmath21 itself may depend on the choice of the basepoint . for example , if one takes @xmath446 $ ] with the subspace metric then one can check that @xmath65 based at @xmath447 will consist of a single point , while @xmath65 based at any point in @xmath448 $ ] will be @xmath448 $ ] . the following lemma clears up this issue : [ baseok]suppose that @xmath0 is a uniform space such that for some choice of basepoint @xmath130 , the projection @xmath20 is surjective . then @xmath0 is chain connected . moreover , if @xmath0 satisfies the definition of coverable for @xmath130 then 1 . for any two basepoints there is a natural system of uniform homeomorphisms between the fundamental inverse systems of @xmath0 with respect to the two basepoints . in particular the spaces @xmath21 constructed with each basepoint are naturally uniformly homeomorphic . 2 . @xmath0 satisfies the definition of coverable for any choice of basepoint . if @xmath20 is surjective then since @xmath449 , @xmath133 is surjective . it now follows from lemma [ lemsur5 ] that @xmath0 is chain connected . the first statement now follows from the observations in remark [ basepoint ] . the second statement follows from the first ; essentially the two inverse systems are the same and so the projections are surjective in one if and only if they are surjective in the other . [ maincov]let @xmath0 be coverable and @xmath450 . then @xmath451 and @xmath452 comprise an inverse system of discrete covers and @xmath55 is a cover with covering group @xmath453 . since @xmath0 is coverable we may take @xmath454 for our indexing set . if @xmath64 is an @xmath176-loop and @xmath136 is an @xmath176-chain then @xmath455_{f}([\alpha ] _ { f}))=\phi _ { ef}([\lambda \ast \alpha ] _ { f})=[\lambda \ast \alpha ] _ { e}\]]@xmath456_{e}([\alpha ] _ { e})=\theta _ { ef}([\lambda ] _ { f})(\phi _ { ef}([\alpha ] _ { f})\text{.}\]]that is , the system is compatible in the sense of @xcite . since each @xmath457 is surjective , so is each @xmath14 and according to corollary 0530cov , each @xmath14 is a discrete cover . the proof is now finished by @xcite , theorem 44 . when @xmath0 is coverable we will refer to the projection @xmath458 as the universal covering map of @xmath0 . we will always take @xmath19 to have the ( prodiscrete ) inverse limit topology , with respect to which @xmath19 is complete and hausdorff . @xmath459 is also prodiscrete with respect to the topology of uniform convergence since @xmath50 is a cover ( see @xcite ) . it may be that the topology of uniform convergence is the the same as the induced topology , but we have no need for such a statement in this paper . [ 0607uniform]let @xmath0 be a uniform space and @xmath56 be a uniformity base . the following are equivalent for a fixed basepoint @xmath130 : 1 . @xmath56 is universal . 2 . @xmath460 and for any @xmath267 with @xmath461 , @xmath14 is a uniform homeomorphism . 3 . @xmath460 and for any @xmath57 , @xmath462 is a uniform homeomorphism . suppose that @xmath56 is universal and @xmath267 are entourages in @xmath463 . then @xmath433 satisfies @xmath464 and is therefore a uniform homeomorphism . since @xmath23 lies in any universal base , 1)@xmath4652 ) . if 2 ) holds then we may use @xmath56 as our indexing set for the fundamental inverse system of @xmath0 and since each of the bonding maps is a uniform homeomorphism the inverse system is in fact trivial . therefore each @xmath466 is a uniform homeomorphism and 3 ) follows . if 3 ) is given then note that for any @xmath57 we have that @xmath467 is a uniform homeomorphism and we see that @xmath56 is universal . definition [ universaldef ] implicitly involves the choice of a basepoint for the construction of the spaces @xmath2 . however , as the next corollary ( the proof of which is immediate from the proposition [ 0607uniform ] and lemma [ baseok ] ) shows that the definition is independent of basepoint . [ uic]any universal space is coverable , hence chain connected . in particular , if @xmath0 is universal with respect to one basepoint then @xmath0 is universal with respect to any basepoint . [ 0518u]if @xmath0 is universal and @xmath3 is an entourage such that @xmath2 is chain connected then @xmath162 is a uniform homeomorphism . let @xmath267 be an entourage in the universal base . since @xmath2 is chain connected , @xmath433 is surjective . since @xmath468 is bijective and @xmath469 , @xmath14 must also be injective . since @xmath2 is chain connected , lemma [ lemsur5 ] implies that @xmath14 is surjective , hence a uniform homeomorphism because @xmath14 is bi - uniformly continuous . therefore @xmath470 is a uniform homeomorphism . [ xic]if @xmath0 is coverable then @xmath21 is universal . applying proposition [ coverchain ] and lemma [ 41 ] we have that @xmath65 is chain connected . a basis element for the uniformity of @xmath65 is of the form @xmath471 , where @xmath267 are entourages in @xmath0 . let @xmath167 be a covering entourage contained in @xmath472 . then @xmath473 is surjective and @xmath474@xmath475 in other words , @xmath476 and we may take for our basis elements of @xmath21 entourages of the form @xmath477 . we will now apply corollary [ 67 ] , taking @xmath32 to be the surjective map @xmath478 . we have the following diagram : @xmath479according to proposition [ identify ] the function @xmath480 is a uniform homeomorphism and we may conclude that @xmath481 is also a uniform homeomorphism . the collection of all such @xmath82 is therefore a universal base for @xmath76 . [ uit]the following are equivalent for a coverable space @xmath0 . 1 . @xmath0 is universal . 2 . for every entourage @xmath3 such that @xmath2 is chain connected , @xmath482 is trivial ( i.e. , every @xmath3-loop based at @xmath130 is @xmath3-homotopic to the trivial loop ) . @xmath19 is trivial . the implication ( 1)@xmath465(2 ) follows from corollary [ 0518u ] . if ( 2 ) holds then for any coverable entourage @xmath3 , @xmath483 is a uniformly contionuous surjection and hence @xmath2 is chain connected . therefore each @xmath77 is trivial and the inverse limit @xmath19 is trivial . finally , if @xmath19 is trivial then the universal covering map is a uniform homeomorphism and since @xmath21 is universal , so is @xmath0 . we will see later ( theorem [ 0627simply ] ) that @xmath70 is universal . consider the entourage @xmath3 consisting of all @xmath484 such that @xmath485 , where @xmath486 . it is not hard to see that @xmath487 is an @xmath3-loop based at @xmath488 that is not @xmath3-homotopic to the trivial loop . at the same time it is true that @xmath489 is uniformly homeomorphic to @xmath490 , where @xmath41 has the discrete uniformity , and hence @xmath489 is not chain connected ( see example 48 in @xcite for more details ) this shows that one can not expect @xmath78 to be trivial for every choice of @xmath3 when @xmath0 is universal . if @xmath47 is a uniformly continuous bijection between coverable spaces @xmath0 and @xmath46 and @xmath46 is universal then @xmath0 is universal . suppose @xmath46 is universal and let @xmath176 be an entourage in the universal base for @xmath46 . then @xmath337 is a uniform homeomorphism and by corollary [ 67 ] @xmath162 is a uniform homeomorphism , where @xmath316 . [ disccover]let @xmath491 be a discrete cover , where @xmath0 is chain connected . for any sufficiently small @xmath82-invariant entourage @xmath3 and @xmath492 , the function @xmath211 is a uniform homeomorphism . since @xmath32 is a discrete cover , there exists an entourage @xmath167 such that if @xmath493 satisfies @xmath494 for some @xmath88 then @xmath495 . suppose that @xmath3 is any invariant entourage such that @xmath496 . since @xmath32 is a quotient mapping , @xmath497 is an entourage in @xmath46 . we will first show that @xmath498 is injective . by lemma [ lemsur2 ] we may equivalently prove that if @xmath499 is an @xmath3-chain in @xmath0 such that @xmath500 for some @xmath402 and the @xmath176-loop @xmath206 is @xmath176-homotopic to the trivial loop @xmath501 then @xmath495 ( so @xmath127 is an @xmath3-loop ) and @xmath127 is @xmath3-homotopic to the trivial loop @xmath502 . let @xmath503 . we will prove the statement by induction on the minimal length @xmath126 of an @xmath176-homotopy between @xmath206 and @xmath504 . if @xmath505 then @xmath206 is already trivial and so is @xmath441 , and the proof is finished . suppose we have proved it for some @xmath506 , and there is some @xmath176-homotopy of @xmath206 to @xmath504 of length @xmath126 . suppose that the first step in the @xmath176-homotopy is to add a point : @xmath206 is @xmath176-related to @xmath507 . that is , @xmath508 . now there exists @xmath509 such that @xmath510 and @xmath511 , and therefore some @xmath402 such that @xmath512 . since @xmath3 is invariant , we have that if @xmath513 then @xmath514 and @xmath515 . likewise there is some @xmath516 such that @xmath517 and @xmath518 . since @xmath519 , @xmath520 , and @xmath518 , it follows that @xmath521 . but since @xmath522 , @xmath523 for some @xmath524 and by choice of @xmath167 , it must be that @xmath525 and @xmath526 . the inductive hypothesis now finishes the proof . now suppose that the first step in the homotopy is to remove a point : @xmath206 is @xmath176-related to @xmath527 ; that is , @xmath528 . as in the preceding argument there is some @xmath493 such that @xmath529 . but @xmath530 , so @xmath531 , and we conclude that @xmath532 . therefore @xmath533 and we may again apply the inductive hypothesis . to see why @xmath279 is surjective , let @xmath534 be an @xmath176-chain in @xmath46 . we will prove the statement by induction in @xmath86 . if @xmath298 then the proof is obvious since @xmath535 by assumption . suppose we have proved it for @xmath536 . then we can find some @xmath3-chain @xmath537 such that @xmath538 for all @xmath6 . since @xmath539 , and @xmath540 , we may again use the invariance of @xmath3 to see that there exists some @xmath541 such that @xmath542 and @xmath543 . then @xmath115 is an @xmath3-chain such that @xmath544 . to finish the proof of the proposition , let @xmath141 be an entourage in @xmath545 , where @xmath140 is an invariant entourage in @xmath0 ( @xmath167 exists since @xmath82 acts isomorphically ) . since @xmath0 is chain connected , @xmath546 by proposition [ xee ] , and @xmath547 is an entourage in @xmath548 . the proof will be complete if we show that @xmath549 , which makes @xmath550 an entourage . let @xmath142_{f},[\beta ] _ { f})\in k^{\ast } $ ] which means @xmath143_{f},[\beta ] _ { f})=([\ast = y_{0}, ... ,y_{n},y]_{f},[\ast = y_{0}, ... ,y_{n},z]_{f})\]]with @xmath551 . using the invariance of @xmath3 and @xmath167 and proceeding inductively as we have done above , we can find @xmath3-chains @xmath552 and @xmath553 such that @xmath554 and @xmath555 , and @xmath556 . by definition , @xmath557_{e},[\beta ^{\prime } ] _ { e})\in d^{\ast } $ ] and @xmath558_{e}),f_{ef}([\alpha ^{\prime } ] _ { e})\right ) = ( [ \alpha ] _ { f},[\beta ] _ { f})$ ] . [ base2]we give one final comment about basepoints and lifts of functions following lemma [ baseok ] . the lifting theorems below are true for any choice of basepoints such that the functions involved are basepoint - preserving . for example , in the proposition below we may start with a basepoint @xmath130 in @xmath0 , choose @xmath535 in @xmath46 , use any basepoint @xmath559 to construct @xmath560 and then choose another basepoint @xmath130 in @xmath560 so that @xmath561 . [ liftlem]let @xmath0 be universal , @xmath46 be uniform and @xmath47 be uniformly continuous . then 1 . for any entourage @xmath3 in @xmath46 there is a unique uniformly continuous function @xmath562 such that @xmath563 and @xmath564 . there is a unique uniformly continuous function @xmath565 such that @xmath566 and @xmath567 , where @xmath568 is the projection . define @xmath562 as follows . let @xmath176 be an entourage in the universal base of @xmath0 such that @xmath569 and @xmath570 be the unique uniformly continuous function given by theorem [ 60 ] ( @xmath571 is a uniform homeomorphism and therefore @xmath311 is chain connected ) . define @xmath572 . if @xmath573 were any such function then it follows from the uniqueness of @xmath574 that @xmath575 and hence that @xmath576 . note that by uniqueness , if @xmath577 are entourages in @xmath46 we have that @xmath578 and by the universal property of the inverse limit there is a unique function @xmath59 such that @xmath579 for every entourage @xmath3 and @xmath580 . suppose that @xmath581 is uniformly continuous such that @xmath582 and @xmath583 . note that for any entourage @xmath3 in @xmath46 we have @xmath584and therefore by uniqueness in part ( 1 ) , @xmath585 . since @xmath586 is also induced by the functions @xmath587 , @xmath588 . the functions @xmath589 and @xmath590 will both be referred to as lifts of @xmath32 [ 76]let @xmath0 and @xmath46 be uniform , @xmath47 be a cover , @xmath34 be universal , and @xmath591 be uniformly continuous . then there exists a unique uniformly continuous function @xmath592 such that @xmath593 and @xmath594 . suppose first that @xmath32 is a discrete cover . according to proposition disccover there is an entourage @xmath3 in @xmath0 such that if @xmath492 then @xmath595 is a uniform homeomorphism and @xmath290 . define @xmath592 by @xmath596 ( where @xmath597 is the lift of @xmath403 given by proposition [ liftlem ] ) . then @xmath594 and @xmath598@xmath599to prove uniqueness , suppose that @xmath600 is any such function . consider the lift @xmath601 . we have @xmath602by uniqueness of lifts ( proposition [ liftlem ] ) , @xmath603 . but then @xmath604 and @xmath605 now suppose that @xmath32 is an arbitrary cover . by theorem 48 in @xcite there exists an inverse system @xmath606 such that @xmath607 is a discrete cover and @xmath608 and @xmath609 for some minimal element @xmath74 . according to what we proved above , for each @xmath136 there is a unique uniformly continuous function @xmath610 such that @xmath611 and @xmath612 . if @xmath613 we have that @xmath614and by uniqueness @xmath615 . by the universal property of inverse limits there is a unique uniformly continuous function @xmath616 such that for all @xmath136 , @xmath617 and @xmath594 . now suppose @xmath618 is any uniformly continuous function such that @xmath619 and @xmath620 . define @xmath621 . we have that @xmath622 and @xmath623by the uniqueness of @xmath624 , @xmath625 and therefore @xmath626 . if @xmath46 is coverable then by theorem [ xic ] , @xmath560 is universal and we obtain : [ partialstep]let @xmath47 be a cover where @xmath0 is uniform and @xmath46 is coverable , and @xmath568 be the projection . then there exists a unique uniformly continuous function @xmath627 such that @xmath628 and @xmath629 . [ quick]if @xmath47 is a bi - uniformly continuous surjection where @xmath0 is universal and @xmath46 is uniform then @xmath46 is coverable . let @xmath56 be a universal base for @xmath0 . since @xmath32 is a bi - uniformly continuous surjection , the set @xmath630 of all @xmath631 such that @xmath632 is a base for the uniformity of @xmath46 . we may index the fundamental system for @xmath46 using @xmath630 , and for each @xmath633 in @xmath634 we may use @xmath176 in the construction of the lift @xmath589 . since @xmath635 we will be finished by the definition of coverable if we can show that each @xmath589 is surjective . let @xmath636 be an @xmath3-chain in @xmath46 . we will show by induction on @xmath86 that there is an @xmath176-chain @xmath637 such that @xmath638 and , by definition of @xmath589 , this completes the proof . for @xmath298 the proof is obvious . now suppose we have an @xmath176-chain @xmath639 such that @xmath640 . since @xmath641 there is some ordered pair @xmath642 such that @xmath643 . the @xmath176-chain @xmath644 now satisfies @xmath645 . [ bi]if @xmath0 is coverable and @xmath47 is a bi - uniformly continuous surjection then @xmath46 is coverable . in particular , any quotient by an equiuniform action , hence by an isomorphic action , on a coverable uniform space is coverable . since the universal cover @xmath20 is a bi - uniformly continuous surjection , so is @xmath646 . the proof is finished by corollary [ quick ] and theorem [ xic ] . [ 73]let @xmath26 be coverable spaces , @xmath47 be uniformly continuous , and @xmath20 and @xmath647 be the projections . then there is a unique uniformly continuous function @xmath30 , such that @xmath648 and @xmath649 . moreover , 1 . for any @xmath650 and @xmath651 , @xmath652 . 2 . the restriction @xmath653 of @xmath33 to @xmath19 is a homomorphism into @xmath654 . if @xmath32 is a discrete cover then @xmath33 is a uniform homeomorphism . 4 . if @xmath34 is uniform and @xmath35 is uniformly continuous then @xmath655 ( and in particular @xmath656 ) . for the main statement , define @xmath657 . if @xmath658 is a uniformly continuous function with @xmath659 then by definition @xmath403 is a lift of @xmath660 and so @xmath661 . for part ( 1 ) , note that if @xmath662 then @xmath663 and @xmath664therefore @xmath665 . for any entourage @xmath176 in @xmath46 let @xmath3 be an entourage in @xmath0 such that @xmath207 . now @xmath666 and @xmath667 are both lifts of @xmath660 to @xmath282 and therefore @xmath668 ( see proposition [ liftlem ] ) . now let @xmath669 and @xmath650 with @xmath670 _ { e}$ ] and @xmath671 _ { e}$ ] . by definition of the action of the inverse limit group @xmath82 on the inverse limit space @xmath21,@xmath672 _ { e}\right ) \text{.}\]]the latter quantity , by definition of @xmath279 , is equal to@xmath673 _ { f}=\left [ f(\gamma _ { e})\ast f(\alpha _ { e})\right ] _ { f}=\left [ f(\gamma _ { e})\right ] _ { f}\ast \left [ f(\alpha _ { e})\right ] _ { f}\text{.}\]]as a special case when the @xmath403 is the identity , @xmath674_{f}\right ) \text{.}\]]if @xmath675 then @xmath676 _ { f}\text{.}\]]combining these we obtain @xmath677when @xmath662 , we have@xmath678which gives the second statement . if @xmath491 is a discrete cover then @xmath32 is bi - uniformly continuous and we may index the fundamental system of @xmath46 using entourages of the form @xmath679 where @xmath3 is an invariant entourage in @xmath0 . then by uniqueness , @xmath33 is induced by the functions @xmath279 . proposition [ disccover ] implies that the functions @xmath279 are all uniform homeomorphisms and hence @xmath33 must be a uniform homeomorphism . the last part follows from uniqueness of @xmath680 . [ 101]if @xmath0 and @xmath46 are coverable spaces and @xmath47 is a cover then @xmath30 is a uniform homeomorphism . if @xmath0 is coverable then @xmath681 is a cover with covering group @xmath682 . let @xmath20 and @xmath28 be the projections . we will show that the lift @xmath683 given by corollary [ partialstep ] and proposition [ liftlem ] is an inverse to @xmath33 . first note that @xmath684that is , @xmath685 is the unique lift of the identity on @xmath46 and hence must be the identity on @xmath560 . now according to theorem [ 76 ] , @xmath50 is the unique lift of the function @xmath660 ; that is , the unique uniformly continuous function @xmath686 such that such that @xmath687 and @xmath688 . but we also have that @xmath689 in other words , @xmath690 . we now have @xmath691and @xmath692 must be the unique lift of the identity on @xmath0 , hence the identity on @xmath21 . we have shown that both @xmath693 and @xmath33 are uniform homeomorphisms and inverses of one another . for the second part note that since @xmath0 is coverable , @xmath50 is bi - uniformly continuous and since @xmath694 , @xmath695 is bi - uniformly continuous . now @xmath696 for @xmath697 if and only @xmath698 , or equivalently , letting @xmath699 and @xmath700 there is some @xmath651 such that @xmath701 . but this is equivalent to @xmath702(the second equality comes from theorem [ 73 ] ( 1 ) ) . that is , the orbits of @xmath703 are precisely the preimages of points with respect to @xmath695 . according to @xcite this means that @xmath695 is the quotient with respect to the action of @xmath703 . finally , since @xmath704 , which acts prodiscretely and isomorphically , so does @xmath703 and @xmath705 is a cover with covering group @xmath703 ( see remark 13 in @xcite ) . since a universal space is uniformly homeomorphic to its own universal cover by proposition [ 0607uniform ] , we obtain : the universal cover of a coverable space is unique up to uniform homeomorphism . more precisely , if @xmath0 is coverable , @xmath46 is universal , @xmath706 is a cover and @xmath20 is the universal cover then @xmath707 is a uniform homeomorphism . we will say that a topological space @xmath0 is simply connected if every loop in @xmath0 is null - homotopic , regardless of whether @xmath0 is pathwise connected . recall that @xmath0 is called locally connected ( resp . locally pathwise connected ) if for every @xmath88 and open set @xmath90 containing @xmath40 there is a connected ( resp . pathwise connected ) open set @xmath708 with @xmath709 . @xmath0 is semilocally simply connected if each @xmath88 is contained in an open set @xmath90 such that every loop in @xmath90 based at @xmath40 is null - homotopic in @xmath0 ( see @xcite ) . in a uniform space it is natural to consider the situation when these local conditions are true uniformly . [ unidef]a uniform space @xmath0 is called uniformly locally connected ( resp . uniformly locally pathwise connected ) if for each entourage @xmath3 there is an entourage @xmath267 such that all @xmath176-balls are open and connected ( resp . open and pathwise connected ) . @xmath0 is called uniformly semilocally simply connected if there exists an entourage @xmath3 such that any loop in @xmath710 based at @xmath88 is null - homotopic in @xmath0 . note that given any @xmath3 as in the above definition , any entourage @xmath711 has the same property . a uniform space @xmath0 is uniformly locally connected ( resp . uniformly locally pathwise connected ) if and only if for every entourage @xmath3 there exists an entourage @xmath176 with open balls such that for every @xmath88 there exists some open set @xmath712 such that @xmath713 and @xmath712 is connected ( resp . @xmath90 is pathwise connected ) . necessity is trivial ; take an entourage @xmath176 with open balls and let @xmath714 . to prove the converse , let @xmath3 be any entourage in @xmath0 and @xmath715 be an entourage such that @xmath716 . let @xmath167 be an entourage such that for each @xmath88 there exists an open set @xmath712 that is connected ( resp . pathwise connected ) , such that @xmath717 . define @xmath718 by @xmath719@xmath176 is symmetric by definition and certainly contains the diagonal . now @xmath720which , being the union of connected ( resp . pathwise connected ) open sets @xmath721 containing @xmath40 , is open and connected ( resp . pathwise connected ) . @xmath176 is an entourage since by definition @xmath283 . finally , if @xmath722 then @xmath723 and @xmath724 for some @xmath725 containing @xmath40 . since @xmath726 , @xmath727 . [ 428unif]let @xmath0 be a locally connected ( resp . locally pathwise connected ) compact topological space . then @xmath0 , with the unique uniformity compatible with its topology , is uniformly locally connected ( resp . uniformly locally pathwise connected ) . if @xmath0 is both locally pathwise connected and semilocally simply connected then @xmath0 is uniformly semilocally simply connected . recall that the unique compatible uniformity on @xmath0 has as a basis all symmetric open subsets of @xmath23 that contain the diagonal . let @xmath3 be any entourage in @xmath0 and for any @xmath88 let @xmath712 be an open and connected ( resp . pathwise connected ) neighborhood of @xmath40 such that @xmath728 . let @xmath267 be the union of all sets @xmath729 . then @xmath176 is open and symmetric , hence an entourage . if @xmath730 then @xmath731 for some @xmath732 , and therefore @xmath733 and @xmath734 both lie in @xmath735 . that is , @xmath736 is the union of all sets @xmath737 such that @xmath738 . since each @xmath735 is connected ( resp . pathwise connected ) , so is @xmath736 . if @xmath0 is both locally pathwise connected and semilocally simply connected then by what we proved above , for every @xmath88 there is an arbitrarily small entourage @xmath739 such that the ball @xmath740 is open and pathwise connected . by choosing @xmath739 small enough we may assume that every loop in @xmath740 based at @xmath40 is null - homotopic in @xmath0 . for each @xmath40 let @xmath741 be an entourage with open balls such that @xmath742 . let @xmath743 be a finite open cover of @xmath0 , and let @xmath744 . for any @xmath88 there is some @xmath745 such that @xmath746 . if @xmath723 then @xmath747 and @xmath748 . that is , @xmath749 . given any loop @xmath127 in @xmath736 based at @xmath40 , join it to @xmath745 by a path in @xmath750 from @xmath40 to @xmath745 . the resulting loop based at @xmath745 is null - homotopic in @xmath0 , and hence so is @xmath127 . [ 315conn]let @xmath0 be a chain connected uniform space . if there is an entourage @xmath3 of @xmath0 such that the @xmath3-balls of @xmath0 are connected ( resp . pathwise connected ) then @xmath0 is connected ( resp . pathwise connected ) . it will follow from proposition [ consume ] and a standard theorem from topology if we show by induction that all @xmath85-balls are connected . the @xmath751 case is given . suppose that @xmath85-balls and @xmath3-balls are all conneced for some @xmath86 . let @xmath752 . by definition of @xmath753 there is some @xmath732 such that @xmath754 and @xmath755 . each of these balls is connected and they intersect in @xmath732 , hence their union is connected set . we have shown that every element of @xmath756 is contained in a connected subset of @xmath756 containing @xmath40 , and so @xmath753 is connected . if the @xmath3-balls are all pathwise connected then by what we have just proved @xmath0 is connected and locally pathwise connected , hence pathwise connected . if @xmath0 is chain connected and uniformly locally connected ( resp . uniformly locally pathwise connected ) then @xmath0 is connected ( resp . pathwise connected ) . [ 52]let @xmath0 be a uniform space and @xmath3 be an entourage in @xmath0 such that the @xmath3-balls have one of the following properties : chain connected , connected , pathwise connected . then @xmath2 has the same property . suppose that the @xmath3-balls of @xmath0 are chain connected . let @xmath267 be an entourage and @xmath637 be an @xmath3-chain . since the @xmath3-balls are chain connected we may suppose up to @xmath3-homotopy that @xmath194 is an @xmath176-chain . for example , we may join @xmath118 and @xmath757 by an @xmath176-chain @xmath758 that lies entirely in @xmath759 . we may remove the points @xmath760 one at a time in order to obtain an @xmath3-homotopy from @xmath761 to @xmath136 . then letting @xmath762 we have that @xmath763_{e},[\alpha _ { i+1}]_{e})\in f^{\ast } $ ] for all @xmath6 . in particular , @xmath764_{e}, ... ,[\alpha _ { n}]_{e}=[\alpha ] _ { e}\}$ ] is an @xmath219-chain to @xmath202_{e}$ ] . this shows that @xmath2 is chain connected . now if @xmath185 has connected ( resp . pathwise connected ) balls then these balls are chain connected and therefore @xmath2 is chain connected by what we just proved . according to proposition [ xee ] , the @xmath163-balls in @xmath2 are connected ( resp . pathwise connected ) , and lemma [ 315conn ] now shows that @xmath2 is connected ( resp . pathwise connected ) . [ 0627simply]if @xmath0 is a uniformly locally pathwise connected , connected and simply connected uniform space then @xmath0 is universal . let @xmath3 be an entourage with pathwise connected open balls . then @xmath2 is pathwise connected by proposition [ 52 ] . moreover , by corollary 34 of @xcite , the action of @xmath77 on @xmath2 is properly discontinuous . since @xmath0 is a poincar space , @xmath765 is a traditional cover ( cf . @xcite ) and since @xmath0 is simply connected , @xmath133 must be a trivial cover , hence bijective . this means that the bi - uniformly continuous mapping @xmath133 is a uniform homeomorphism . [ compactu]every compact , connected , locally pathwise connected , simply connected topological space is universal . proposition [ liftlem ] now implies : [ pathlift]if @xmath766\rightarrow x$ ] is a ( continuous ) path , where @xmath0 is uniform , with @xmath767 , then there is a unique lift @xmath768\rightarrow \widetilde{x}$ ] such that @xmath769 and @xmath770 , where @xmath20 is the projection . a similar statement holds for homotopies . if @xmath766\rightarrow x$ ] is a path from @xmath130 to @xmath88 then @xmath771 . we have : [ pathsur]if @xmath0 is a uniform space with projection @xmath458 then the pathwise connected component of @xmath0 at @xmath130 is contained in @xmath772 , where @xmath773 is the pathwise connected component of @xmath774 in @xmath21 . [ 0628new]if @xmath0 is a connected , uniformly locally pathwise connected uniform space then @xmath0 is coverable . in particular , every compact , connected , locally pathwise connected topological space is coverable . we may index the fundamental system of @xmath0 using entourages having pathwise connected balls . but for each such @xmath3 , @xmath2 is pathwise connected by proposition [ 52 ] and therefore each @xmath775 is surjective by the previous corollary . [ 0518simp]suppose @xmath0 is a uniformly locally pathwise connected uniform space having an entourage @xmath3 such that for all @xmath88 every loop in @xmath776 is null - homotopic in @xmath0 and an entourage @xmath176 having pathwise connected balls such that @xmath777 . then @xmath347 is pathwise connected , uniformly locally pathwise connected and simply connected , hence universal . according to proposition [ 52 ] , @xmath347 is pathwise connected , and the @xmath778-balls , which are uniformly homeomorphic to the @xmath176-balls , are pathwise connected . by proposition [ identify ] the function @xmath779 is a uniform homeomorphism . this implies that every @xmath219-loop in @xmath347 is @xmath219-homotopic to the trivial loop . now let @xmath766\rightarrow x_{f}$ ] be a loop based at @xmath130 . since @xmath317 is uniformly continuous there is some @xmath219-loop @xmath780 such that each @xmath781 for some @xmath6 and @xmath782)\subset b(x_{i},f^{\ast } ) $ ] for all @xmath6 . we may use any @xmath219-homotopy from @xmath441 to @xmath130 to construct a null - homotopy from @xmath317 to the trivial loop as follows . suppose that @xmath783 for some @xmath784 . we may join @xmath745 to @xmath734 and @xmath734 to @xmath785 by paths @xmath786 and @xmath787 in @xmath788 . let @xmath789 be the restriction of @xmath317 to @xmath790 $ ] . then we have a loop @xmath791 , each segment of which lies in the @xmath219-ball centered at its endpoint . now let @xmath792 , which is a loop consisting of three segments , each of which lies in the @xmath176-ball centered at its endpoint . since @xmath777 , @xmath793 lies entirely in the @xmath3-ball centered at a point , and hence is null - homotopic in @xmath0 . according to theorem [ 76 ] any null - homotopy of @xmath794 lifts to a null - homotopy of @xmath137 . in other words , the path @xmath317 is homotopic to a path @xmath795 obtained by replacing @xmath789 by @xmath786 concatenated by @xmath787 . we may carry out a similar process when removing any point in @xmath127 to form a new @xmath219-chain as part of an @xmath219-homotopy of @xmath127 . finitely many such steps show that @xmath317 is null - homotopic . since the @xmath176-balls of @xmath0 , and hence the @xmath219-balls of @xmath347 , are pathwise connected , @xmath347 is uniformly locally pathwise connected and pathwise connected , hence universal by theorem 0627simply . let @xmath766\rightarrow x$ ] be a path in a coverable space @xmath0 such that @xmath797 . since @xmath798 , @xmath799 , where @xmath50 is the universal covering map of @xmath0 and @xmath800 is the lift given by proposition [ liftlem ] that is , @xmath801 . define a function @xmath80 by @xmath802)=c_{l}(1)$ ] , where @xmath803 $ ] is the homotopy equivalence class of a loop @xmath317 based at @xmath130 . this function is well defined . in fact , suppose @xmath317 and @xmath335 are loops based at @xmath130 that are homotopic via a homotopy @xmath804\times \lbrack 0,1]\rightarrow x$ ] , with @xmath805 and @xmath806 . then @xmath807 is a path joining @xmath808 to @xmath809 , both of which lie in @xmath810 . but @xmath811 is a prodiscrete group ( hence totally disconnected ) with respect to the subspace topology . therefore @xmath812 . [ lifter]let @xmath0 be coverable , @xmath803\in \pi _ { 1}(x)$ ] , where @xmath813\rightarrow x$ ] is based at @xmath130 , and @xmath3 be an entourage in @xmath0 . if @xmath814 are such that for every @xmath6 , @xmath815 for all @xmath816 $ ] then @xmath817))=[\ast = c(t_{0}), ... ,c(t_{n})]_{e}$ ] . ( such values @xmath818 always exist since @xmath317 is uniformly continuous . ) note that by definition,@xmath819))=\theta _ { e}(c_{l}(1))=c_{e}(1)\]]where @xmath820 is the lift given by proposition [ liftlem ] . let @xmath821 , where the points @xmath818 satisfy the conditions of the proposition . we will show by induction on @xmath6 that @xmath822_{e}$ ] for all @xmath246 . the case @xmath823 is trivial . suppose that we have proved the statement for some @xmath6 , @xmath117 . by definition , @xmath824_{e},[c(t_{0}),c(t_{1}), ... ,c(t_{i}),c(t_{i+1})]_{e})\in e^{\ast } \]]and @xmath825_{e})=c(t_{i+1})$ ] . recall from proposition [ xee ] that @xmath133 is a uniform homeomorphism when restricted to any @xmath163-ball of @xmath2 , and since we also have @xmath826 we will be finished if we can show @xmath824_{e},c_{e}(t_{i+1}))\in e^{\ast } \text{.}\]]but the unique lift @xmath827 of @xmath828}$ ] to @xmath2 starting at @xmath829 must be @xmath830}$ ] , where @xmath208 is the inverse of @xmath133 restricted to @xmath831_{e},e^{\ast } ) $ ] . since @xmath832}$ ] also satisfies the conditions for this lift , we must have that @xmath833_{e},e^{\ast } ) \text{.}\ ] ] [ nat]if @xmath0 is coverable then the natural mapping @xmath834 is a homomorphism , the image of which is the normal subgroup @xmath835 of @xmath19 that leaves invariant the pathwise connected component of @xmath21 containing @xmath130 . in particular , @xmath62 is surjective if and only if @xmath21 is pathwise connected . to see why @xmath62 is a homomorphism note that @xmath836)\circ d_{l}\right ) ) = c\ast d$ ] ( here @xmath837)\circ d_{l}$ ] is the translate via the uniform homeomorphism @xmath837)$ ] of @xmath838 to the endpoint of @xmath800 and @xmath839 is the universal covering map of @xmath0 ) and therefore by uniqueness , @xmath840)\circ d_{l}\right ) = \left ( c\ast d\right ) _ { l}$ ] . but the endpoint of @xmath841)\circ d_{l}$ ] is @xmath842)\lambda ( [ d])$ ] . if @xmath651 stabilizes the pathwise connected component of @xmath21 containing @xmath774 then @xmath130 and @xmath843 are joined by an path @xmath136 , and @xmath844 is a loop based at @xmath130 with @xmath845)=g$ ] . on the other hand , if @xmath403 lies in the image of @xmath62 then @xmath130 and @xmath846 are joined by an path ( namely the lift of a loop , the image of whose equivalence class is @xmath403 ) . now suppose @xmath40 lies in the pathwise connected component of @xmath21 containing @xmath130 . we may join @xmath40 to @xmath130 by an path @xmath317 . but then @xmath847 joins @xmath848 and @xmath843 , and we have already observed that the latter is joined to @xmath130 by an path . the kernel of @xmath62 , by definition , consists of those @xmath803 $ ] such that @xmath849 lifts to a loop in @xmath21 , or equivalently the lift of @xmath317 to each @xmath2 is a loop . it is of obvious interest when @xmath850 is trivial . this can be checked in some special cases . for example , in the case of the hawaiian earring , a problem that essentially amounts to the injectivity of @xmath62 occupied several papers ( @xcite , @xcite , d ) and was simply stated in @xcite ( along with an incorrect statement that amounts to surjectivity of @xmath851 . [ inj]let @xmath0 be coverable . then 1 . if @xmath21 is simply connected then @xmath834 is injective . 2 . if @xmath0 is pathwise connected and @xmath61 is injective then @xmath21 is simply connected . if @xmath21 is simply connected and @xmath803\in \ker \lambda $ ] then @xmath317 lifts to a loop @xmath800 in @xmath21 based at @xmath130 , which is then null - homotopic . the image of any null - homotopy of @xmath800 via the universal covering map @xmath50 is a null - homotopy of @xmath317 . now suppose that @xmath0 is pathwise connected and @xmath834 is injective . let @xmath766\rightarrow \widetilde{x}$ ] be a loop based at some point @xmath40 . then @xmath852 is a loop in @xmath0 , where @xmath50 is the universal covering map of @xmath0 . let @xmath853\rightarrow x$ ] be the concatenation of a path @xmath136 from @xmath130 to @xmath854 , followed by @xmath855 , parameterized so that the restriction to @xmath856 $ ] is @xmath852 . so @xmath335 represents an element of @xmath857 . let @xmath651 be such that @xmath858 ( such a @xmath403 exists since @xmath859 ) . now the composition of @xmath403 with @xmath860}$ ] is simply @xmath317 and therefore @xmath861}$ ] is a loop . but then @xmath862)=0 $ ] and since @xmath62 is injective , @xmath335 must be null - homotopic . but then any null - homotopy of @xmath335 lifts to one of @xmath838 , and the composition of the lifted homotopy with @xmath403 gives rise to a null - homotopy of @xmath317 . [ dense]if @xmath0 is a uniformly locally pathwise connected , connected uniform space then the pathwise connected component of @xmath21 is dense in @xmath21 and @xmath863 is dense in @xmath453 . these two statements follow from the following general result concerning induced functions on inverse limits : let @xmath864 be an inverse system of topological spaces with continuous bonding maps and @xmath865 . let @xmath866 be a collection of continuous surjections from a topological space @xmath46 such that @xmath867 for all @xmath613 . then the induced mapping @xmath868 has dense image in @xmath0 . we do not have a reference for this exact statement but the proof is straightforward and similar to the proof of iii.7.3 proposition 2 in @xcite . now if @xmath3 has pathwise connected balls then @xmath2 is pathwise connected and by corollary [ pathsur ] the restriction @xmath793 of @xmath25 to the pathwise connected component @xmath773 of @xmath21 is surjective onto @xmath2 and the proof of the first part is finished by the above general statement . on the other hand , if @xmath869 then there is some path @xmath136 from @xmath130 to @xmath40 , and @xmath870 is a loop @xmath127 in @xmath0 based at @xmath130 such that the unique lift @xmath871 has @xmath40 as its endpoint . but then @xmath872)=x$ ] . in other words , @xmath873 is surjective , and the proof is finished by the above general statement . note that the above proof really only requires that there be a basis for the uniformity of @xmath0 such that for each @xmath3 in the basis , @xmath2 is pathwise connected . since the closure of a connected set is connected we have : if @xmath0 is a uniformly locally pathwise connected , connected uniform space then @xmath21 is connected . [ newquotient]if @xmath0 is a locally pathwise connected and connected space and @xmath773 is the pathwise connected component of @xmath21 containing @xmath130 then @xmath0 is the quotient of @xmath773 by the free isomorphic action of @xmath874 . we already know that @xmath863 acts freely and isomorphically on @xmath773 since @xmath19 does . we need to check that the restriction @xmath794 of @xmath50 to @xmath773 is bi - uniformly continuous and that for any @xmath875 , @xmath876 is precisely the orbit @xmath877 of @xmath40 ( see remark 13 of @xcite ) . we know that @xmath793 is uniformly continuous . let @xmath878 be an entourage in @xmath773 ; we may assume that the @xmath3-balls are pathwise connected , hence @xmath2 is pathwise connected , hence the restriction @xmath879 of @xmath25 to @xmath773 is surjective by corollary [ pathsur ] . since @xmath879 is surjective , @xmath880now @xmath881which is an entourage since @xmath133 is bi - uniformly continuous . this shows that @xmath793 is bi - uniformly continuous . the statement about the orbits simply follows from the fact that the orbits of @xmath793 are precisely the orbits of @xmath50 intersected with @xmath773 and that @xmath882 for any @xmath883 . note that when @xmath62 is injective , the action in the above proposition is in fact an action by @xmath884 . on the other hand , when @xmath62 is not surjective one has the disadvantage that @xmath773 is not complete with the uniformity induced by @xmath21 . a uniform space @xmath0 is called strongly coverable if @xmath0 is chain connected and for some entourage @xmath3 , @xmath2 is universal , hence the universal cover of @xmath0 . it is clear from the discussion in the introduction that the topologist s sine curve is strongly coverable . [ strong]if @xmath0 is strongly coverable and uniformly locally pathwise connected then @xmath80 is surjective . let @xmath3 be an entourage such that @xmath2 is universal and @xmath267 be an entourage having pathwise connected balls . then @xmath347 is pathwise connected and @xmath219 is in the universal base of @xmath2 by corollary [ 0518u ] . hence @xmath2 and @xmath347 are uniformly homeomorphic and therefore @xmath885 is also pathwise connected . the proof is finished by theorem [ nat ] . from theorem [ 0518simp ] , lemma [ strong ] , and proposition [ inj ] we obtain : every connected , uniformly locally pathwise connected and uniformly semi - locally simply connected uniform space @xmath0 is strongly coverable with pathwise connected , simply connected universal cover and @xmath886 . [ 0518equiv]if @xmath0 is a compact poincar space then @xmath21 is the traditional universal cover of @xmath0 and @xmath834 is an isomorphism . we refer the reader to @xcite for more background on dimension and uniform spaces . suppose that @xmath0 has uniform dimension @xmath73 , which we denote by @xmath887 . this means that any uniform open cover @xmath888 of @xmath0 has a refinement by a uniform open cover of order @xmath889 ( a uniform open cover is an open cover that is refined by the cover of @xmath0 by @xmath176-balls for some fixed entourage @xmath176 ) . note that this particular notion of dimension is called large dimension in @xcite , and is denoted by @xmath890 . we will use theorems from @xcite concerning another dimension , called uniform dimension in @xcite and denoted by @xmath891 . this particular notion of dimension uses finite covers and is somewhat more difficult to work with in the present situation . however , it is always true that @xmath892 ( theorem v.5 in @xcite in fact the dimensions are equal if @xmath890 is finite ) and therefore if we know that @xmath893 then we may use theorems from @xcite that require @xmath894 . if @xmath0 is compact then both of these dimensions are equal to covering dimension , which we denote by @xmath895 . [ dimprop]if @xmath0 is a uniform space with @xmath893 then for any entourage @xmath3 , @xmath896 . every uniform open cover of @xmath2 is refined by the cover of @xmath2 by @xmath778-balls for some entourage @xmath176 such that @xmath777 and therefore we need only consider the open cover of @xmath2 by @xmath219-balls for such @xmath176 . by definition of uniform dimension , the cover of @xmath0 by @xmath176-balls has a refinement by a uniform open cover @xmath888 such that every @xmath88 is contained in at most @xmath889 sets in @xmath888 . let @xmath897 . then @xmath898 for some @xmath88 . let @xmath899 be the collection of all sets of the form @xmath900 where @xmath901 and @xmath902 . first , @xmath903 is a cover . in fact , if @xmath904 , @xmath905 for some @xmath906 , with @xmath898 . but @xmath133 restricted to @xmath907 is a uniform homeomorphism onto @xmath908 , which contains @xmath909 since @xmath777 . therefore there is some @xmath910 . but @xmath911 and @xmath912 ; therefore @xmath913 . that is , @xmath914 . since @xmath888 is a uniform cover , so is @xmath903 . in fact , if the @xmath167-ball cover of @xmath0 refines @xmath915 for some @xmath283 then the @xmath141-ball cover refines @xmath916 . by definition , @xmath903 refines the @xmath219-ball cover of @xmath2 . finally , to check that the order of @xmath903 is at most @xmath889 , we need only check that if @xmath917 are distinct and @xmath918 then @xmath919 \cap \left [ \phi _ { xe}^{-1}(a)\cap b(z , f^{\ast } ) \right ] = \varnothing \text{.}\]]but @xmath788 and @xmath920 are already disjoint , because otherwise for any @xmath921 we would have @xmath922 , which contradicts the fact that @xmath133 is injective on @xmath163-balls . in @xcite , theorem iv.32 it is shown that the inverse limit of spaces with uniform dimension at most @xmath86 must have uniform dimension at most @xmath86 . therefore by proposition [ dimprop ] : [ dimthm]if @xmath0 is a coverable uniform space with @xmath893 then @xmath923 . note that essentially the same argument shows that if @xmath0 and @xmath46 are uniform spaces , @xmath47 is a cover , and @xmath924 then @xmath887 . we conjecture that in this situation @xmath0 and @xmath46 have exactly the same dimension . [ circle ] if @xmath0 is coverable uniform space with @xmath925 then @xmath926 contains no simple closed curve ( i.e. topological circle ) . suppose that there is a topological embedding @xmath927 with the inverse homeomorphism @xmath928 . by theorem [ dimthm ] we have @xmath929 and therefore by theorem v.13 of @xcite there is an extension of @xmath403 to a uniformly continuous function @xmath930 . choose any point @xmath130 as the basepoint in both @xmath38 and @xmath21 , and choose @xmath843 as the basepoint in @xmath931 ( see remark [ base2 ] ) . let @xmath932 be the traditional universal cover of @xmath931 also with some choice of basepoint @xmath130 in @xmath933 which is also the universal cover in the sense of the present paper by corollary 0518equiv . since @xmath934 is universal by theorem [ xic ] , proposition [ liftlem ] ( 2 ) implies that there is a unique lift @xmath935 such that @xmath936 and @xmath937 thus we get that @xmath938this implies that @xmath939 is a topological embedding of @xmath931 into @xmath940 , which is impossible . [ laminj]if @xmath0 is coverable uniform space with @xmath941 ( in particular if @xmath0 is compact with covering dimension @xmath942 ) , then @xmath65 is simply connected and if @xmath0 is pathwise connected the homomorphism @xmath943 is injective . by proposition [ inj ] , it is enough to prove that @xmath934 is simply connected . suppose that @xmath766\rightarrow \tilde{x}$ ] is a loop in @xmath944 . then its image @xmath945 is a peano continuum that contains no simple closed curves by proposition [ circle ] . by the hahn - muzurkiewicz theorem , @xmath945 is locally connected , hence a dendrite ( see section 51 , vi in @xcite ) . then @xmath946 is contractible by corollary 7 in section 54 , vii of @xcite . therefore @xmath945 has trivial fundamental group . this means that any loop at any basepoint in @xmath945 ( including the loop @xmath317 ) is null - homotopic in @xmath945 hence in @xmath65 . combining the above theorem with proposition [ newquotient ] we have the following : let @xmath0 be a pathwise connected , uniformly locally pathwise connected uniform space with @xmath947 . then @xmath0 is the quotient of a one - dimensional pathwise connected , simply connected uniform space via a free isomorphic action of @xmath884 . [ tcc]let @xmath0 be a uniform space . we define an entourage @xmath3 to be chain connected if every @xmath3-ball in @xmath0 is chain connected . we say @xmath0 is totally chain connected if @xmath0 has a uniformity base that includes @xmath948 such that each entourage in the base is chain connected . from proposition [ 52 ] we immediately have : [ 315totally]if @xmath0 is a totally chain connected uniform space and @xmath3 is a chain connected entourage then @xmath2 is totally chain connected . if moreover @xmath0 is uniformly locally connected ( resp . uniformly locally pathwise connected ) then @xmath2 has the same property . in the proof of theorem 9 , @xcite , it was shown that the character group of @xmath949 is not coverable . but this group is known to be connected and locally connected , hence totally chain connected . every totally chain connected pseudometric space @xmath0 is coverable . since @xmath0 is a pseudometric space we can find a countable sequence @xmath950 of chain connected entourages forming a base for the uniformity of @xmath0 ( hence cofinal in the set of all entourages of @xmath0 ) . therefore @xmath951 . each of the spaces @xmath952 is chain connected by lemma [ 315totally ] and when @xmath953 we may identify @xmath954 with @xmath955 by proposition [ identify ] . therefore , lemma [ lemsur5 ] implies that each bonding map @xmath956 is surjective . since the inverse system is countable it follows that the projections @xmath957 are all surjective . since connected sets are chain connected , we have the following two corollaries : [ pseu]every connected , uniformly locally connected pseudometric space is coverable . recall that a peano continuum is a hausdorff topological space that is the continuous image of an interval . equivalently ( by the hahn - mazurkiewicz theorem ) , a peano continuum is a compact , connected , locally ( pathwise ) connected metrizable space . [ peano]every peano continuum @xmath0 is coverable . moreover , there is a compact subset @xmath38 of the pathwise connected component of @xmath21 such that the restriction of the universal covering map @xmath50 to @xmath38 is surjective . the first statement follows from corollary [ 0628new ] . let @xmath813\rightarrow x$ ] be a continuous surjection . then @xmath958)$ ] has the desired properties . [ metnote]to simplify matters , when @xmath0 is a metric space we refer to an @xmath44-loop , where @xmath44 is the metric entourage having open @xmath45-balls as @xmath44-balls , as an @xmath959-loop ( @xmath960 ) , @xmath44-homotopies as @xmath959-homotopies , etc . we will denote @xmath961 by @xmath962 , @xmath963 by @xmath964 , @xmath965 by @xmath966 , and @xmath967 by @xmath968 . note that for a metric space @xmath0 and @xmath960 , the cover @xmath969 is a broadening of the notion of @xmath45-cover , something that goes back at least to spanier s book ( @xcite ) , and has been used in @xcite and @xcite to study universal covers of limits of riemannian manifolds . however , the construction of @xmath45-covers uses paths and standard homotopies rather than chains . it is not hard to construct examples of uniformly locally pathwise connected metric spaces having metric balls that are not necessarily pathwise connected , and so that the metric entourages are not covering entourages . recall that an _ inner metric space _ is a metric space such that the distance between any two points is the infimum of lengths of curves joining them . a _ geodesic _ space further has the property that the distance is realized as the length of some curve , called a minimal geodesic . the metric balls of any inner metric space are pathwise connected and therefore the metric entourages are covering entourages . we have : [ inner]every inner metric space @xmath0 is coverable . moreover , @xmath970 , where @xmath971 is any sequence of positive values decreasing to @xmath488 . from lemma [ 315totally ] and corollary [ uit ] we have : an inner metric space @xmath0 is universal if and only if for any @xmath972 , every @xmath45-loop based at some point is @xmath45-homotopic to the trivial loop . note that the topologist s sine curve , discussed in the introduction , is coverable but not totally chain connected because at some points every small neighborhood contains pairs of points that can not be joined by an arbitrarily fine chain that stays inside the neighborhood . we next give a unified calculation of the deck groups @xmath19 of the hawaiian earring @xmath973 , the sierpinski gasket @xmath974 , and sierpinski carpet @xmath975 . this unified calculation is possible because each of these spaces admits a description as a countable intersection @xmath976 let us begin with the case @xmath977 define @xmath978 as the closed disc @xmath979 of diameter 1 , lying in the upper euclidean half - plane @xmath980 and tangent to the @xmath40-axis at the origin @xmath981 . let @xmath982 be its boundary circle . denote by @xmath983 the @xmath136-homothety of euclidean plane @xmath984 with the center @xmath985 we omit @xmath317 in the notation if @xmath986 now define @xmath987 , @xmath988 iteratively by the formulas @xmath989then @xmath973 is defined by formulas ( [ ind1 ] ) and ( [ inters ] ) . for @xmath974 let @xmath990 be the isosceles triangle of diameter 1 in the euclidean quarter - plane @xmath991 , with one side on the @xmath40-axis and one vertex @xmath992 ; denote the other vertices by @xmath993 . now define @xmath987 iteratively by the formulas @xmath994then @xmath974 is defined by formulas ( [ ind2 ] ) and ( [ inters ] ) . for @xmath975 let @xmath995 be the square of diameter 1 in the euclidean quarter - plane @xmath991 with one side on each of the coordinate axes . denote by @xmath996 its vertices and @xmath997 the midpoints of its sides . now define @xmath987 iteratively by the formulas @xmath998then @xmath975 is defined by formulas ( [ ind3 ] ) and ( [ inters ] ) . denote by @xmath999 the number @xmath1000 in the cases @xmath1001 and @xmath974 and the number @xmath1002 in the case @xmath975 . moreover , by our choice of @xmath1003 , @xmath1004 ( see notation [ metnote ] ) is the universal cover of @xmath987 , which means that the projection @xmath1005 is an isomorphism . one can easily see that in all cases @xmath987 is a compact poincar space and @xmath1006 is isomorphic to @xmath1007 via the map @xmath1008 defined in definition [ induced ] , where @xmath1009 is the inclusion . according to corollary [ 0518equiv ] , @xmath1010 is an isomorphism . therefore for any fixed @xmath86 , the function @xmath1011 is an isomorphism . according to proposition [ lifter ] , the image with respect to @xmath1012 of an equivalence class of a loop @xmath317 based at @xmath130 is the @xmath3-homotopy class of any sufficiently fine @xmath3-chain of the form @xmath1013 . therefore , if @xmath1014 we have the following commutative diagram:@xmath1015where @xmath1016 is inclusion and @xmath1017 with @xmath1018 being the inclusion - induced mapping given by definition [ induced ] . but @xmath987 is homotopic to a wedge product of @xmath1019 circles , where @xmath1020 for @xmath973 , @xmath1021 for @xmath974 , and @xmath1022 for @xmath1023 so , in any case , @xmath1024 where @xmath1025 is the free group with @xmath9 generators . note that @xmath1026 and for all three examples the inverse sequence @xmath1027 is a cofinal sequence in the inverse system @xmath1028 where @xmath1029 is the unique surjective homomorphism that kills one extra generator . although all three spaces have the same deck group , the spaces @xmath1030 and @xmath1031 are mutually non - homeomorphic one - dimensional peano continua . in fact , the last two spaces are not semi - locally simply connected at any point , while @xmath1032 has unique point ( @xmath1033 ) , at which it is not semi - locally simply connected . the spaces @xmath1034 and @xmath1031 are not homeomorphic , because the first space have a countable subset @xmath1035 such that @xmath1036 is null - homotopic in itself , while the second one has no such subset . we can take @xmath1037where @xmath126 is the midpoint of the segment @xmath1038,$ ] and @xmath1039for every subset @xmath1040 since @xmath1034 and @xmath1031 are non - homeomorphic one - dimensional peano continua that are not semi - locally simply connected at any point , then by a result of @xcite , @xmath1041 and @xmath1042 are not isomorphic as abstract groups . thus it follows from this and the above result @xmath1043 that the homomorphism @xmath1044 can not be a bijection for all three examples . finally , note that the conditions of proposition dense are satisfied and hence the image of the fundamental group with respect to @xmath62 is dense in @xmath19 in each case . a similar discussion may be applied to the sierpinski sponge @xmath1045 ( also known as the universal sierpinski curve ) which is formed by successively removing middle cores from the unit cube , implying that @xmath1046 is also the inverse limit of finitely generated free groups . it is well - known that every @xmath74-dimensional locally connected metrizable continuum can be topologically embedded in @xmath1047 . by a result of curtis and fort ( @xcite ) , these embeddings induce inclusions of the fundamental group , and it follows that the fundamental group of any such continuum embeds in an inverse limit of finitely generated free groups . this fact has been previously established by various authors , most recently @xcite . the construction , in @xcite , of the group @xmath1048 for a ( hausdorff ) topological group @xmath82 is the same as the construction that we use in the present paper . however , the construction in the prior paper includes a compatible group structure on each group in the fundamental inverse system , which induces a group structure on @xmath1048 so that the natural homomorphism @xmath1049 is a quotient map with closed , central , prodiscrete kernel . ( there are also several results in @xcite that have no analogs for uniform spaces in general , such as results concerning extensions of local homomorphisms . ) for a topological group @xmath82 , the condition that we call universal in this paper is equivalent to what was called locally defined in @xcite , by proposition 61 of @xcite . a coverable group was defined to be the quotient of a locally defined group via a closed normal subgroup . according to corollary [ bi ] in the present paper , such a group is a coverable uniform space . the converse of this statement involves theorem 90 in @xcite , which requrires a correction . in fact , professor helge glckner of t. u. darmstadt has pointed out that the proof of lemma 42 in @xcite has a gap , and we do not know whether this lemma is true . the only direct reference to lemma 42 is theorem 90 , and in light of this gap part ( 2 ) of theorem 90 should be restated as the following stronger condition : ( 2@xmath1050 ) @xmath82 has a basis for its topology at @xmath1051 consisting of locally generated symmetric neighborhoods , and @xmath1052 is surjective for all @xmath90 in this basis . the proof may be modified to show ( 1 ) implies ( 2@xmath1053 ) as follows . in the first part of the proof it is shown that @xmath50 is surjective and that @xmath1054 is coverable . the same argument may then be applied to show that @xmath1052 is surjective , proving ( 2@xmath1053 ) . in the proof of ( 2)@xmath465(3 ) , lemma 42 is only used to prove that all of the homomorphisms @xmath1052 are surjective , and so ( 2@xmath1053 ) eliminates the need for lemma 42 . note that ( 2@xmath1053 ) is actually a stronger condition than the definition of coverable in the present paper , which now completes the proof that a topological group is coverable in the sense of @xcite if and only if it is coverable in the present sense . we know of no example of a uniform space @xmath0 ( let alone topological group ) that is not coverable and @xmath20 is surjective , hence it is still possible that theorem 90 ( or its generalization to uniform spaces ) is true as stated . however , the revised version is sufficient for all applications in @xcite and @xcite except for three . the first is corollary 91 of @xcite , which is not used elsewhere . the second exception is that the alternate hypothesis in theorem 15 or @xmath1049 is surjective needs to be taken out ( or replaced by a stronger assumption related to the new condition ( 2@xmath1053 ) ) . the third exception is corollary 107 , which is nt used elsewhere . in the interest of completeness we will now address every reference to theorem 90 both in @xcite and @xcite to show that the new version is sufficient . since ( 2@xmath1053 ) is stronger than ( 2 ) , there is no problem with any statement that does nt involve ( 2)@xmath465(1 ) or ( 2)@xmath1055(3 ) . theorem 90 is used this way in proofs of the following statements in @xcite : theorem 4 , theorem 5 , proposition 10 , example 99 , theorem 92 ( necessity ) , theorem 101 , and theorem 15 ( second reference ) . now consider the remaining references : in theorem 92 ( sufficiency ) of bptg , all of the projections are surjective and therefore ( 2@xmath1053 ) holds . in @xcite , theorem 24 is simply a restatement of theorem 90 ( with an additional statement about metric spaces added ) and therefore ( 2 ) must be replaced by ( 2@xmath1053 ) . theorem 24 is only used in the proof of theorem 7 , and the only problematic usage is that theorem 24 , ( 2)@xmath1055(3 ) , is used to prove theorem 7 , ( 6)@xmath465(1 ) . however , it is well - known that an pathwise connected , locally compact group is locally pathwise connected . therefore for any pathwise connected symmetric open set @xmath90 containing the origin , @xmath1054 is pathwise connected and hence @xmath1056 is surjective . that is , the conditions for ( 2@xmath1053 ) are satisfied . the relationship between covers in the present sense and covers in the sense of @xcite is considered in @xcite . note that our paper partially answers problem 152 in @xcite , which asks whether the generalized fundamental group in that paper , which is the same as the deck group in the present paper , is a topological invariant . from the present paper we know that the deck group is in fact an invariant of uniform structures and for compact groups a topological invariant . there are several other theorems from @xcite that likely can be generalized to the more setting of uniform spaces , and these will be considered in a future paper . some of the questions of that paper have analogs for uniform spaces , most notably : Abstract:

Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.

Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered . Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video . Paper: active galactic nuclei are powerful sources of radiation in a wide spectral range : from @xmath1 rays to radio waves . they derive their extraordinary luminosities ( sometimes more than @xmath2 times higher than luminosities of `` ordinary '' galaxies ) from energy release by matter accreting towards , and falling into , a central supermassive black hole ( see e.g. * ? ? ? according to the unification model of agn @xcite , their central engine consists of a supermassive black hole ( smbh ) with mass ranging from @xmath3 to @xmath4 solar masses @xmath5 @xcite , which is surrounded by an accretion disk that radiates in the x - ray band @xcite . the vast majority of the x - ray sources in the universe are agn . the integral emission of agn reflects the history of accretion onto smbh over cosmic time . emission lines are usually seen in the x - ray spectra of agn . the broad emission fe k@xmath0 spectral line ( 6.46.9 kev , depending on ionization state ) with asymmetric profile ( narrow bright blue peak and a wide faint red wing ) has been observed in a number of type 1 agn ( see e.g. * ? ? ? early results from the asca ( _ advanced satellite for cosmology and astrophysics _ ) era suggested that broad relativistic lines might be common in type 1 agn . however , surprisingly , they have been detected in significant number and their features described in only a small fraction of those sources @xcite . the first and the best studied one is mcg-6 - 30 - 15 @xcite . in some cases the line width corresponds to one third of speed of light , indicating that its emitters rotate with relativistic velocities . therefore , the line is probably produced in a very compact region near the central black hole of agn and can provide us some essential information about the plasma conditions and the space - time geometry in vicinity of the black hole . consequently , if the line is emitted close enough to the smbh , it shows a broad relativistic profile affected by smbh spin @xcite and gravitational redshift ( as well as other general relativistic effects ) @xcite . several studies have been performed over samples of local agn ( see e.g. * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * etc ) , as well as from distant quasars @xcite in order to characterize the fe k@xmath0 emission . @xcite performed a spectral analysis of a sample of 26 type 1 to 1.9 seyferts galaxies ( @xmath6 ) observed by _ xmm - newton_. they found that a relativistic line is significantly detected in a half of their sample ( 54@xmath710 percent ) with a mean equivalent width ( ew ) of @xmath8 80 ev , but around 30% of selected agn showed a relativistic broad line that can be explained by the emission of an accretion disk . accretion disks could have different forms , dimensions , and emission , depending on the type of central black hole , whether it is rotating ( kerr metric ) or non - rotating ( schwarzschild metric ) . they represent an efficient mechanism for extracting gravitational potential energy and converting it into radiation , giving us the most probable explanation for the main characteristics of agn ( high luminosity , compactness , jet formation , rapid time variations in radiation and the profile of the fe k@xmath0 spectral line ) . here we discuss the x - ray radiation from relativistic accretion disks around supermassive black holes , supposed to exist in the centers of agn . especially , we discuss the fe k@xmath0 line profile which originates from the accretion disk . moreover , we also present some effects which can disturb the fe k@xmath0 profile , such as : perturbations in the disk emissivity , absorbtion by warm absorbers and gravitational microlensing . the aim of this chapter is to present a short overview of results of some recent investigations in this field , and it is divided into the following six sections : _ active galactic nuclei as hosts of supermassive black holes _ - where the main features , classification and unified model of active galaxies are briefly presented , _ space - time geometry in vicinity of supermassive black holes _ - where the basic definitions of schwarzschild and kerr metrics are given , _ accretion disk around a supermassive black hole _ - where we explain the standard model of an accretion disk , including its emission , accretion rate , luminosity , structure and spectral distribution , _ supermassive black holes and x - ray emission _ - where the focus is on the modeling of the observed x - ray radiation from relativistic accretion disk around a supermassive black hole of agn in both the fe k@xmath0 spectral line and x - ray continuum , _ variability of x - ray emission around supermassive black hole _ - where we present the main causes of rapid and irregular variability of the x - ray emission which can be due to disk instability , reflecting in perturbations of its emissivity , or it could be caused by some external effects , such as gravitational microlensing and absorption by x - ray absorbers , and finally _ conclusion _ - where the most important results from previous sections are pointed out and their brief summary is given . finally , we should note that a huge number of papers devoted to investigation of the x - ray emission of agn was published in the last two decades , so it was not possible to mention all of them here , but more details and references can be found in review papers such as e.g. @xcite , etc . active galaxies differ from the so called `` normal '' galaxies in the amount of energy emitted from their nuclei . the term _ active galactic nuclei _ ( agn ) refers to the energetic phenomena in the central region of a galaxy which can not be solely or directly produced by stars . the nebular - like emission spectra of ngc 1068 , ngc 4051 and ngc 4151 , with h@xmath0 , [ o ii ] @xmath93727 , [ ne iii ] @xmath93869 and [ o iii ] @xmath10 4363,4959,5007 were observed by @xcite , but the first classification of these objects was made by @xcite . he recognized these objects as a class of galaxies with strong and high - excitation optical emission lines localized in the nuclei . active galaxies have been the subject of an intensive astrophysical investigations for the last 3 4 decades . as the most luminous objects with one of the most powerful energy release rates and with the most compact dimensions , agn are of the great interest in modern astrophysics . agn ( i.e. quasars ) are the brightest objects in the universe and thus , these objects are important for the studies of the early universe and cosmology in general . for instance , studies of their luminosity functions or quasar host galaxies are crucial for understanding the formation and evolution of galaxies in general . the class of active galaxies contains many different objects , such as quasars , gigantic elliptic radio galaxies , luminous spiral seyfert galaxies , blazars , etc . agn are the most luminous objects in the universe and they have luminosities in the range from @xmath11 to @xmath12 erg s@xmath13 , that can be @xmath14 times greater than in the case of a typical galaxy . apart from their great luminosities , agn are emitting in the broad band of electromagnetic spectrum . the observed emission of agn is in the continuum and in lines , from the @xmath1 and x domains to the far infrared and radio bands ( see e.g. * ? ? ? one of the characteristics of agn is violent and fast variability observed in different parts of electromagnetic spectra . fast changes in the agn brightness are observed sometimes just for a couple of days , e.g. in the case of galaxy ngc 4151 @xcite . this leads to the conclusion that the emission regions in the agn have small dimensions ( from only couple of light days up to couple of light months ) . also , the brightness of agn can be so high that the brightness of the host galaxy can be neglected in the total brightness ( for instance in the case of quasars ) . consequently , they are compact regions which could not be directly observed in the most bands of electromagnetic spectrum . therefore , agn and their physical / kinematical properties are indirectly studied through the analysis of their spectra . in contrast to the spectral energy distribution ( sed ) of an ordinary galaxy ( that represents a sum of stellar spectra , thus the most of its luminosity comes within no more than one decade of frequency ) , agn emit across the broad range of frequencies ( of order @xmath3 hz ) . the agn continuum in a number of high - luminosity sources peaks in the ultraviolet , i.e. in the so called big blue bump ( bbb ) @xcite . the bbb is attributed to the thermal emission from an optically thick region of the accretion disk @xcite , or from optically thin regions , i.e. free - free emission @xcite . the observed sed in agn is remarkably different from the thermal ( black - body ) spectrum of a star or a regular galaxy @xcite . this featureless continuum observed in agn characterizes the main source of energy input and suggests that the mechanisms that produce it are common to all types of agn . the sed can be approximated with the power law function @xmath15 where @xmath0 is the spectral index @xcite . the observed continuum of a typical seyfert 1 galaxy is very strong compared with seyfert 2 galaxies ; as a result seyfert 1 galaxies appear to be more luminous than seyfert 2-s . some agn have the sed almost flat from the infrared to x - ray part of the spectrum , so that the spectral index is @xmath16 , although it is usually steeper . in the radio band , the brightness of active galaxies is usually an order of magnitude higher than of normal galaxies . but still , even if it is so intensive , the radio luminosity is never higher more than 1% of the bolometric luminosity . another property of agn is strong x - ray flux , with the x - ray continuum produced by lower energy photons which are compton scattered to higher energies by relativistic electrons @xcite . the fraction of the power emitted in the x - ray emission is three or four times larger in agn than in normal galaxies @xcite , therefore the x - emission can indicate the presence of agn . today , it is widely accepted that the mechanism which powers agn is accretion onto supermassive black hole ( smbh ) , i.e. the greatest part of the continuum emission comes from an accretion disk and its corona . the mass of the supermassive black hole is estimated to be from @xmath3 to @xmath17 @xcite . thus , in the center of an agn there is a supermassive black hole with an accretion disk surrounded by gas and dust in the form of a torus . there are also other emitting regions present in the vicinity of the supermassive black hole , such as ionized gas clouds that produce intensive emission lines or jets of matter that are mostly visible in the radio band , but sometimes they can also be seen in the optical band . the kinematics of these regions is very complex as well as the physical processes that produce such specific spectra of these objects . in the central part , there are mainly three emitting line regions : fe k@xmath0 ( in the x - ray range ) , broad and narrow line emitting regions ( blr and nlr , respectively ; in optical / uv spectra ) . in the optical and uv band , the total flux of emission ( and occasionally absorbtion ) lines contributes from several percent to tens of percent of the continuum flux . the existence of the broad and narrow emission lines comes from the fact that an agn contains two separated emission line regions with different kinematics , density , ionization , optical thickness and radiation transfer . the basic characteristics of the blr and nlr can be described as follows : - blr is a compact region , with dimensions from only couple of light days up to couple of light weeks @xcite , that is located in the vicinity of the black hole ( @xmath181 pc ) . the structure of this region is very complex and most likely it consists from at least two separated subregions ( see e.g.@xcite , etc ) . the ionized gas in this region is of relatively high density ( @xmath19 ) and temperature @xmath20 k. emitters are moving with high velocities , up to 10000 km / s . in this region the broad emission lines ( bels ) from allowed transitions are formed . nlr extends even up to 1 kpc far from the central source @xcite . the density in this region is significantly smaller ( @xmath21 ) than in the blr , while the temperature is on the same order of magnitude as in the blr . from this region the narrow emission lines ( nels ) arise , indicating a random motion of the emitting gas smaller than 1000 km@xmath22 . nels are often coming from the forbidden transitions . the physical properties of this region are much closer to the properties of emission nebulae than to the blr . according to the different characteristics mentioned above , there are several classes of agn . the first group of stellar systems with active nuclei consists of seyfert galaxies . these are spiral galaxies with very bright nuclei which spectra have strong emission lines of neutral and multi - ionized emitters . the presence of highly ionized emission lines indicates the existence of a non - stellar ionization continuum . the presence or absence of bels ( i.e. blr ) has been historically used to separate seyfert galaxies into two classes . seyfert 1 galaxies have broad permitted ( h i , he i and he ii ) and narrow permitted and forbidden lines ( such as [ o iii ] @xmath95007 ) , while seyfert 2 galaxies have only narrow permitted and forbidden lines @xcite . this simple seyfert classification scheme can be further sub - divided according to specific spectral properties @xcite , as e.g. seyfert galaxies with intermediate balmer profiles are classified as seyfert 1.5-s with apparent narrow balmer line components superimposed on broad wings . many low luminosity galaxies have a nucleus that resembles the seyfert 2 nucleus , but with the spectrum that shows the forbidden lines from lower ionization states . therefore , these galaxies are called low - ionization nuclear emission - line regions , i.e liners . active galaxies which emit intensively in the radio band are so called radio galaxies ( rg ) . radio galaxies are dominantly elliptic galaxies that are divided into two morphologically different types : fr i and fr ii . the classification is done according to the relative position of the surface brightness maximum ( called the hot spot ) in the radio lobes . for example , in the fr i radio galaxy the distance between the hot spot in the radio lobes is less than half of the maximum diameter of the radio source , while in the fr ii type this distance is larger @xcite . like seyfert galaxies , radio galaxies can be divided into subgroups according to the widths of their emission lines , i.e. narrow line radio galaxies ( nlrg ) that emit narrow emission lines characteristic for seyfert 2 galaxies , and broad line radio galaxies ( blrg ) that emit broad lines as seyfert 1 galaxies . being the most powerful sources in the universe , quasars belong to the group of active galaxies with the absolute magnitude @xmath23 @xcite . these quasi stellar ( quasars ) objects emit intensively in the radio domain and their spectrum shows broad emission lines significantly redshifted . in this group of agn there are also quasi - stellar objects ( qsos ) which have the same observed properties as quasars , except they are weak radio sources . besides , there is a group of qsos with broad absorption lines , so called broad absorption line quasars ( bal qsos ) . finally , the separate class of agn are so called bl lacerte ( lacs ) objects . bl lacs are nuclei of elliptical galaxies that emit highly variable and polarized radiation , and have a non thermal optical continuum and a strong radio emission . with this group of galaxies , we often connect another type of agn , optically violently variable ( ovvs ) quasars . the ovvs , in contrast to bl lacs which have featureless continuum , emit broad optical emission lines characteristic for quasars . both these groups of objects are often referred to as one class called blazars . as it was mentioned above , all types of agn have some common properties . it is widely accepted that central engine of an agn is accretion onto supermassive black hole . first observational evidence in favor of a unified model of agn was spectropolarometric observations of seyfert 2 galaxy ngc 1068 @xcite . @xcite found broad balmer lines and fe ii emission , characteristic of a seyfert 1 spectrum , in the polarized spectrum of ngc 1068 . in the unified model of agn @xcite both types of seyfert galaxies are intrinsically the same . the difference in spectral characteristics appears due to different angle of the visibility of the central regions ( see fig . [ fig23_1 ] ) . a geometrically and optically thick dusty molecular torus - like structure surrounds the central source , as well as the blr ( see fig . therefore the visibility of the nuclear engine depends on viewing angle with respect to the torus . the broad - line polarization in seyfert 2-s is probably due to electron scattering . this picture is consistent with the differences observed between continuum fluxes of the seyfert 1 and seyfert 2 galaxies @xcite . following the unified model , the line - of - sights to seyfert 2 galaxies ( or narrow line objects ) are obstructed by optically thick material corresponding to hydrogen column densities of @xmath24 @xcite . for column densities @xmath25 , photons above a few kev can penetrate the torus creating an un - obstructed view of the nuclear source . in this case the source is called _ compton thin_. for column densities @xmath26 , only high energy x - ray emission ( tens of kev ) can pass through the obscuring material @xcite . but in the case @xmath27 even high energy x - rays , above a few tens of kev , are compton scattered and the nuclear source is completely hidden from our direct view . therefore , by observing near the edge - on torus , one can detect narrow line objects , with weak ( or without ) x - ray emission ; while by observing near the face - on torus , one can detect blazars or ovvs . the broad line objects can be detected if one observes an inclined torus . as it was shown in the previous section , according to unified model of agn , in their heart there is a supermassive black hole with mass up to @xmath17 , surrounded by an accretion disk . a black hole is a region of space - time around some collapsed mass which gravitational field became so powerful that nothing ( including electromagnetic radiation ) could escape from its attraction , after crossing the certain boundary called the event horizon @xcite . all black holes in nature are commonly classified according to their mass as : supermassive black holes ( with masses @xmath28 ) , intermediate - mass black holes ( @xmath29 ) , stellar - mass black holes ( @xmath30 ) , mini and micro black holes ( @xmath31 ) . in this chapter our focus will be on supermassive black holes located in the centers of agn , because they are surrounded by accretion disks which x - ray radiation is the main subject of this discussion . space - time geometry in vicinity of a supermassive black hole depends on its type ( more precisely , on its angular momentum ) , being either non - rotating , where the local space - time geometry is described by schwarzschild metric , or rotating , where the kerr metric determines the geometry of local space - time . the term black hole was introduced in 1969 by the american scientist john wheeler , but the predecessor of the modern idea of black holes emerged in the late eighteenth century . it was independently developed by the british geologist john michell in 1783 and the french mathematician and astronomer pierre - simon laplace in 1796 . this idea was based on newton s theory of gravity and particle theory of light , and is commonly referred to as a dark star . a dark star is , according to michell , a sufficiently massive and compact star which have such a strong gravitational field that the corresponding surface escape velocity equals or exceeds the speed of light . therefore , any light emitted from the surface of such star would be dragged back by the gravitational field and we would not be able to see it , but we could still feel its gravitational attraction @xcite . after the wave theory of light was founded , the idea about a dark star was forgotten since , according to the wave theory , it was not clear that light could be affected by gravity at all . modern theory of black holes was founded in the twentieth century , more precisely in 1915 , shortly after einstein introduced the theory of general relativity , when the german physicist and astronomer karl schwarzschild found a particular exact solution to the einstein field equations , for the limited case of a single spherical non - rotating mass . the implications of the general relativity to the stellar evolution were firstly understood by subrahmanyan chandrasekhar in 1928 @xcite . he calculated a maximum limit for the mass of a star , above which the star would not be able to support itself ( by repulsion of electron degeneracy pressure which arises from pauli exclusion principle ) against its own gravity , after it had used up all its fuel . this limit ( @xmath32 ) is nowadays known as the chandrasekhar limit . if a star s mass is less than this limit , it can eventually stop contracting at a final state known as a `` white dwarf '' @xcite . a similar discovery was made in 1932 by the russian scientist lev davidovich landau . he found that there is another limiting mass ( @xmath33 ) , for which the corresponding final state is much smaller than a white dwarf and which would be supported against its gravity by the exclusion principle repulsion between neutrons and protons , rather than between electrons . such stars are therefore called neutron stars @xcite . all these results led to a surprising conclusion that a star which mass is above the chandrasekhar limit , when it comes to the end of its fuel , could experience a catastrophic gravitational collapse to a point with an infinite density . american scientist robert oppenheimer was the first who explained in 1939 that , according to general relativity , stars above @xmath34 would at the end of their lives collapse into black holes , due to reasons given by chandrasekhar @xcite . with the discovery of qsos in the early 60s , the speculations about how their enormous luminosities could be produced within such a small region occurred . thermonuclear reactions were not enough efficient , and therefore , they were quickly eliminated . hoyle and fowler suggested in 1963 that such luminosities could be produced during the collapses and disintegrations of stelar - type objects with masses of @xmath35 @xmath36 @xcite . soon , it became clear that the energy source was gravitational . for example , wheeler suggested a mechanism in which gravitational singularity at the center of a galaxy converted the falling matter into energy @xcite . zeldovich , novikov and salpeter proposed in 1964 the release of energy through accretion due the growth of a massive object at the center of a galaxy , while lynden - bell in 1969 made an attempt to explain the phenomena observed in qsos and seyfert galaxies in terms of a black hole formalism @xcite . a crucial event for the acceptance of black holes was the discovery of pulsars by jocelyn bell in 1967 , because it was the clear evidence of the existence of neutron stars , and therefore , confirmation of chandrasekhar limit . the first detection of a solar mass black hole came in 1972 , when the mass of the rapidly variable x - ray source cygnus x-1 was proven to be above the maximum allowed for a neutron star @xcite . the first convincing evidence for the existence of supermassive black holes is the discovery of the fe @xmath37 spectral line in x - ray spectrum of seyfert galaxy mgc-6 - 30 - 15 by @xcite . nowadays , the black hole theory is very well established , mainly due to the contributions of numerous authors during the second half of the twentieth century , like roy kerr , werner israel , john wheeler , brandon carter , roger penrose , stephen hawking and many others . schwarzschild metric describes the space - time geometry in spherically symmetric gravitational field around a time - steady non - rotating black hole in vacuum . the solution of the einstein field equations under these conditions was found by karl schwarzschild in 1916 @xcite . if we denote the schwarzschild radius which corresponds to a mass @xmath38 by @xmath39 ( where @xmath40 is the gravitational constant and @xmath41 is the speed of light ) , then the squared element of space - time interval @xmath42 in the case of schwarzschild metric is given by : @xmath43 where @xmath44 is the time coordinate measured by a stationary clock at infinity ( which must be distinguished from the proper time @xmath45 , measured by a clock moving with the particle ) , @xmath46 is the radial coordinate , @xmath47 is the colatitude ( angle from north ) in radians and @xmath48 is the longitude in radians . it is obvious from eq . ( [ eq31_1 ] ) that schwarzschild metric depends only on the mass @xmath38 through the schwarzschild radius @xmath49 . the schwarzschild metric has an infinite space - time curvature ( i.e. a singularity ) at @xmath50 . in the case when @xmath51 this metric is reduced to the minkowski metric of flat space - time : @xmath52 . if the complete mass @xmath38 collapses below its schwarzschild radius @xmath49 , then it will form a spherically symmetric schwarzschild black hole . a schwarzschild black hole has no charge or angular momentum and it can be distinguished from any other schwarzschild black hole only by its mass . to a first approximation , the matter surrounding a black hole may be assumed to rotate in circular keplerian orbits with velocity ( e.g. * ? ? ? * ) : @xmath53 . therefore , taking into account that a maximum allowed rotation velocity is speed of light ( @xmath54 ) , one can obtain so called gravitational radius @xmath55 : @xmath56 which is usually used as a unit for distance around a black hole . roy kerr , a new zealand mathematician , found an exact solution of the einstein field equations of general relativity in the case of gravitational field outside an uncharged rotating black hole . the properties of kerr solution , known as kerr metric , are given in numerous papers and books ( see e.g. * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ) and therefore , here we will present only its definition and some basic features , necessary for the further discussion . contrary to the schwarzschild case , the kerr metric is no longer spherically symmetric . in the case of a rotating black hole with mass @xmath38 and angular momentum @xmath57 , this metric is given by ( see e.g. * ? ? ? * ) : @xmath58 where @xmath59 above definition is given in boyer - lindquist coordinates for @xmath60 . as it can be seen from expressions ( [ eq32_1 ] ) and ( [ eq32_2 ] ) , in addition to black hole mass @xmath38 , the kerr metric also depends on its specific angular momentum @xmath61 . here @xmath62 because any additional angular momentum would increase the energy of the black hole and , therefore , its mass @xcite . in the case of a non - rotating black hole , i.e. for @xmath63 , it reduces to the schwarzschild metric . by solving the equation @xmath64 and taking only a root with @xmath65 sign , we obtain the radius of event horizon of a black hole : @xmath66 thus , when @xmath63 then @xmath67 ( because we assumed that @xmath60 ) , whereas when @xmath68 ( i.e. for a maximally rotating black hole ) then @xmath69 . the minimum allowed radius @xmath70 of a stable circular equatorial orbit , or so called marginally stable orbit , is given by the roots of the equation @xcite : @xmath71 , where the upper sign refers to co - rotating orbits , while the lower one to counter - rotating orbits . in the case of schwarzschild metric ( @xmath72 ) @xmath73 , whereas for a maximally rotating black hole ( @xmath74 ) @xmath75 @xcite . rotating black holes are surrounded by a region called the ergosphere , in which there can be no static observers and the negative energy orbits are possible @xcite . also , there is a general relativistic effect known as frame - dragging , according to which a rotating black hole drags the space - time around itself , but such effects will not be discussed here in more details . some observed quasars have luminosities of up to @xmath77 erg / s @xcite . the corresponding total energy emitted during the lifetime of such quasars can be estimated to @xmath78 erg , assuming that their minimum age is about @xmath79 years and that their luminosities do not change significantly over the lifetime @xcite . only two known mechanisms could produce such enormous amount of energy : nuclear fusion and accretion . the maximum efficiency @xmath80 ( defined as the mass fraction of fuel that is converted into energy , according to @xmath81 ) of thermonuclear reactions is @xmath82 . @xcite showed that this value is too low to explain such high energies of @xmath83 erg . accretion is the only remaining mechanism which can yield larger @xmath80 . its maximum efficiency is about @xmath84 for a non - rotating black hole and @xmath85 for a maximally rotating one @xcite . therefore , agn release their enormous energy by matter accreting towards , and falling into , a central supermassive black hole . if the cold matter , which was initially at rest and without magnetic field , was subjected to free radial infall it would accrete to the central black hole without any energy release or observational effects @xcite . however , in the case of agn the accreting matter has a significant angular momentum which does not allow its free infall . at the marginally stable orbit of central black hole with mass of @xmath86 , the specific angular momentum is @xmath87 , which is much less even in comparison to a typical galaxy where the speciffic angular momentum of orbiting material is @xmath88 @xcite . it means that approach of accreting material toward a black hole requires a loss of the greatest fraction of its initial angular momentum . mechanisms which can contribute to such loss of angular momentum are viscosity , nonaxisymmetric gravitational forces , magnetic forces , etc . @xcite . since the orbit of minimum energy for fixed angular momentum in any spherically symmetric potential is a circle , the infall of accreting material due to loss of its angular momentum will be in form of successively smaller and smaller concentric circles . matter traveling along orbits inclined to each other will eventually collide in the plane of intersection , and as a result , the angular momenta of different gas steams will be mixed and equalized . consequently , all accreting matter will orbit in a single plane and will have the same specific angular momentum at any given radius , meaning that accretion is most likely performed through an accretion disk @xcite . the accreting material is able to approach the marginally stable orbit of central black hole only if there is an efficient mechanism for transporting angular momentum outward . magnetic field that exists in matter flowing into the disk , as well as its turbulent motions , enable angular momentum to be transferred outward . hence , the accretion disk is one of the best candidates for a such mechanism , since the particles in it lose their angular momentum due to friction between its adjacent layers and spiral towards black hole , releasing their gravitational energy . part of this energy increases the kinetic energy of rotation and the rest is turned into the thermal energy and irradiated from the disk surface @xcite . the efficiency of angular momentum transport in the disk is characterized by viscosity parameter @xmath89 , which can be assumed as constant in most cases , since the spectrum of disk radiation and its surface temperature do not strongly depend on it , except in the case of a supercritical accretion regime @xcite . the total energy release and the spectrum of emitted radiation are mainly determined by the rate of matter inflow into the disk on its outer boundary , i.e. by its accretion rate which is usually denoted by @xmath90 . if the accretion converts matter to radiation with fixed radiative efficiency @xmath91 ( in rest - mass units ) , then a characteristic scale for the accretion rate is the eddington accretion rate @xcite : @xmath92 for witch the total release of energy in the disk @xmath93 is equal to the eddington luminosity : @xmath94 eddington luminosity defines a critical luminosity for any given mass , beyond which the radiation force overpowers gravity . observed agn have luminosities from @xmath11 to @xmath95 erg / s , which means that their central black holes must have masses from @xmath3 to @xmath17 , respectively @xcite . if we assume that accretion in agn occurs with rate of @xmath96 and with radiative efficiency @xmath97 , the resulting luminosity would be @xmath98 erg / s , which is the middle of the observed luminosity distribution of low redshifted agn @xcite . actual accretion rates @xmath90 of matter inflow into the accretion disks of agn could be many times less or higher than the critical value of the eddington accretion rate . at essentially subcritical accretion rates ( @xmath99 ) , the maximal surface temperatures @xmath100 are on the order of @xmath101 k in the inner regions of the disk , from which the most of energy is released , mainly in uv and soft x - ray bands @xcite . when the accretion rate increases , the luminosity also raises , as well as the effective radiation temperature . at accretion rates comparable to @xmath102 , the accretion disk becomes a powerful source of x - ray radiation with the effective radiation temperature @xmath103 from @xmath79 to @xmath104 k. in a strongly supercritical regime of accretion ( @xmath105 ) , the luminosity becomes fixed at the eddington critical limit @xmath106 and the most of energy is irradiated from accretion disk in uv and optical spectral bands @xcite . by the term `` standard newtonian model of accretion disk '' , here we will assume the disk model given by @xcite . this model was originally developed to describe the accretion disks around stellar sized black holes in the binary systems , but with certain modifications it could be also applied on accretion disks around supermassive black holes in agn . the standard newtonian model of accretion disk is based on the supposition that the released gravitational energy is emitted as a multitemperature blackbody radiation , where the surface temperature profile is given by ( see * ? ? ? * ) : @xmath107^{1/4 } , \label{eq42_1}\ ] ] where @xmath108 is the stefan constant , @xmath40 is the gravitation constant , @xmath38 is the mass of the central black hole , @xmath90 is the accretion rate and @xmath109 is the inner radius of the accretion disk . in above equation and throughout this section we will use the dimensionless disk radius @xmath46 defined as @xcite : @xmath110 where @xmath111 is disk radius expressed in gravitational radii @xmath55 . in the standard model of accretion disk , accretion occurs via an optically thick and geometrically thin disk . the effective optical depth in the disk is very high and photons are close to thermal equilibrium with electrons @xcite . the spectrum of thermal radiation emitted from accretion disk surface depends on its structure and temperature ( and therefore on the distance to the black hole ) , and can have several distributions such as @xcite : 1 . planck distribution in the outer regions of the disk , where free - free and free - bound processes , as well as absorption in the lines of heavy elements broadened by the gas pressure , give the main contribution to the shape of emitted spectrum : @xmath112 where @xmath113 , @xmath114 is planck and @xmath115 is boltzman constant , 2 . more complex spectrum which passed through the homogeneous or exponentially varying medium in intermediate regions of the disk where thomson scattering dominates and 3 . wien distribution in the inner regions where the comptonization processes strongly affect the shape of emitted spectrum : @xmath116 the surface temperature has different radial distributions in different parts of accretion disk and results in the multicolor black body spectrum . in the inner regions of accretion disks of agn where their x - ray radiation is generated , the radial distribution of surface temperature has the following form @xcite : @xmath117 where the temperature constant @xmath118 is chosen so that the corresponding effective radiation temperature is @xmath119 k. this modification of standard disk model is made , because the surface temperature given by eq . ( [ eq42_1 ] ) could not be successfully applied in the case of accretion disks of agn . the distribution of the temperature as a function of the accretion disk radius , according to eq . ( [ eq42_4 ] ) , is presented in fig . [ fig42_1 ] for two different values of angular momentum @xmath61 of central black hole @xcite . ( in the direction normal to the rotation axis , as seen by distant observer ) , given for two different values of angular momentum @xmath61 of central black hole @xcite . negative values of @xmath111 correspond to the approaching and positive to the receding side of the disk . ] one can see from fig . [ fig42_1 ] that the temperature depends not only on disk radius , but also on its other parameters , such as e.g. angular momentum @xmath61 . emitters located at different radii in accretion disk have different temperatures and therefore make different contributions to the observed flux . also , it is noticeable that the temperatures at smaller radii of approaching side of the disk are significantly higher than those on its receding side . intensity of radiation emitted from the total disk surface can be obtained by integration of all local spectra emitted from the above regions : @xmath120rdr , \label{eq42_5}\ ] ] where @xmath109 and @xmath121 are inner and outer radii of accretion disk , respectively . ( upper left ) , 30@xmath122 ( upper right ) , 55@xmath122 ( lower left ) and 80@xmath122 ( lower right ) . the disk rotation is in counterclockwise direction . ] magnetohydrodynamic simulations of an accretion disk as seen by a distant observer at four different inclinations are presented in fig . [ fig42_2 ] @xcite . the most distinctive details in this figure are especially bright regions in form of arcs within the turbulent flow , which trace out the photon trajectories close to the radius of marginally stabile orbit . these arcs are much brighter on approaching side of the disk due to higher surface temperature , as shown in fig . [ fig42_1 ] , and also due to doppler boosting and relativistic beaming which both enhance the flux observed in the direction of motion and diminish the flux in the opposite direction . an accretion disk around a supermassive black holes in the center of agn extends from the radius of marginally stable orbit @xmath123 to the several thousands of gravitational radii . according to its radiation emitted in different spectral bands , it can be stratified in several parts @xcite : 1 . innermost part close to the central black hole which emits x - rays and which extends from the radius of marginally stable orbit @xmath123 to the several tens of gravitational radii ( see e.g. * ? ? ? * ) , 2 . central part ranging from @xmath124 to @xmath125 which emits uv radiation and 3 . outer part extending from several hundreds to several thousands @xmath55 , from which the optical emission is coming @xcite . emissivity of the disk has an important role in the line and continuum shapes . in the rest frame of the emitting material ( i.e. in disk frame ) , emissivity @xmath126 is defined as energy emitted per unit proper time per unit proper area @xcite . in the same frame , it is related to the emitted intensity @xmath127 and emitted flux @xmath128 by @xcite : @xmath129 under assumption that the line emitted at frequency @xmath130 can be approximated by a @xmath131 function . although the standard model of the accretion disk does not predict the power - law for the disk emissivity , such law is usually accepted in the case of the hard x - ray emission from the inner parts of agn accretion disks @xcite . in that case the surface emissivity is assumed to vary with radius as power law with emissivity index @xmath132 @xcite : @xmath133 where @xmath134 is the emissivity constant . @xcite found that emissivity index @xmath132 varies between 0 and 3 for the fe k@xmath0 line emitting region of cygnus x-1 , where the most probable value is @xmath135 . some authors found that models describing the disk emissivity as a broken power law , rather than a single power law , achieve significantly better statistical fits of the x - ray emission in the fe k@xmath0 line @xcite . one such broken power law between some inner radius @xmath109 and outer radius @xmath121 with break radius @xmath136 is given by @xcite : @xmath137 where @xmath138 and @xmath139 are some emissivity indices . using this law @xcite fitted the fe k@xmath0 line of mcg6 - 30 - 15 , assuming a maximally spinning ( @xmath140 ) black hole , and found that the line emissivity followed such dependence for @xmath141 and @xmath142 , where the break radius was @xmath143 . the x - ray continuum can be also modeled e.g. by the following time - independent intrinsic emissivity of the disk as a function of its radius @xmath46 and photon energy @xmath144 @xcite : @xmath145 where @xmath146 is photon index and @xmath0 is radial emissivity power law index of a continuum emitting region . according to some studies of observed x - ray spectra of agn , the values of @xmath146 and @xmath0 are estimated to be about 1.5 and 2.5 , respectively @xcite . in the case of the disk outer parts ( i.e. for optical emitting region ) , the black - body emissivity law is assumed and , according to the eq . ( [ eq42_2 ] ) , emitted intensity is given by planck function @xcite : @xmath147 however , in the inner parts of the accretion disk planck function can not be used properly . in these regions so called `` modified '' black - body emissivity law is applied . according to the eq . ( [ eq42_3 ] ) , the corresponding emitted intensity is given by @xcite : @xmath148 and @xmath149 , around a supermassive black hole with mass @xmath150 @xcite . the continuum shapes are obtained assuming the following three emissivity laws ( all normalized to their maximum values ) : the power law defined by eq . ( [ eq43_1 ] ) with emissivity index @xmath151 , the black - body and `` modified '' black - body emissivity laws defined by eqs . ( [ eq43_3 ] ) and ( [ eq43_4 ] ) , respectively , assuming the radial distribution of the surface temperature given by eq . ( [ eq42_4]).,scaledwidth=80.0% ] a comparison between the shapes of the x - ray continuum ( 1 10 kev ) emitted from an accretion disk around a supermassive black hole , obtained assuming three different emissivity laws , is presented in fig . [ fig43_1 ] @xcite . from fig . [ fig43_1 ] it is clear that x - ray continuum shape strongly depends on adopted emissivity law . a disk geometry for the x - ray emitting regions of agn could be assumed , since the unified model of agn includes a supermassive black hole fed by an accretion disk . @xcite calculated spectral line profiles for radiation emitted from inner parts of accretion disks and later on such features of fe @xmath37 lines were discovered by @xcite in japanese _ asca _ satellite data for seyfert galaxy mgc-6 - 30 - 15 . the assumption of a disk geometry for the distribution of the x - ray emitters in the central parts of agn is also supported by the spectral shape of the fe k@xmath0 line @xcite . moreover , a bump in the uv spectra of agn is present very often , indicating that the uv and optical continua also originate from an accretion disk @xcite . we should note here that probably most of the x - ray emission in the 110 kev energy range originates from inverse compton scattering of photons from the disk by electrons in a tenuous hot corona @xcite . proposed geometries of the hot corona of agn include a spherical corona sandwiching the disk and a patchy corona made of a few compact regions covering a small fraction of the disk @xcite . on the other hand , it is known that part of the accretion disk that emits in the 110 kev rest - frame band ( e.g. the region that emits the continuum compton reflection component and the fluorescent emission lines ) is very compact and may contribute to the x - ray variability in this energy range . a typical x - ray spectrum of agn ( see fig . [ fig50_1 ] ) is composed from the following components @xcite : - an underlying power - law continuum due to thermally comptonized soft photons , a soft excess at low energies below 1 kev due to thermal ( black - body ) emission from an optically - thick accretion disk , a fluorescent / recombination fe k@xmath0 line and a compton hump due to x - ray reflection from the disk . in the following text we will discuss in more details power law component of x - ray continuum and the fe @xmath37 spectral line . agn are powerful sources of x - ray radiation in the continuum from 0.1 to 100 kev , which contains two components ( see fig . [ fig51_1 ] ) : the soft x - rays with a steep spectrum and the hard component with spectrum in form of a power law @xcite . therefore , the observed continuum flux is very often fitted with one or two black - body components in the soft x - rays , in addition to a power law component in the hard x - rays . it is believed that both , soft and hard components mostly arise from the inner region of agn disk , close to the central supermassive black hole ( @xmath152 ) . the first component is probably formed in the accretion disk , which is also a strong source of the soft uv and optical photons , or at least in cold ( @xmath153 k ) accreting gas clouds . the second one is caused by high - energy ( most likely relativistic ) electrons in hot corona above the disk , when they multiply inverse - compton scatter some of the low - energy uv and optical photons from the disk to x - ray energies @xcite . the resulting hard x - ray power law component irradiates the accretion disk and produces a reflection component which causes the observed spectrum to flatten above 10 kev ( see fig . [ fig51_1 ] ) , as compton recoil reduces the backscattered flux @xcite . apart from its own thermal radiation , the cold gas around a black hole is also irradiated by these hard x - ray photons , producing different spectral features through photoelectric absorption , fluorescence ( responsible for occurrence of fluorescent iron lines ) and scattering @xcite . therefore , the observed x - ray spectra of agn consist of an iron line spectrum superposed on a power law continuum @xcite . fluctuations of the x - ray radiation on timescales from several parts of an hour until several days are a common property of all agn @xcite . such fast variations confirm assumption that x - ray radiation is emitted from a very compact region in the center of agn . @xcite showed that a two - component model , consisting of a power - law and a reflection component , could better describe the observed variability of x - ray spectra in the case of several bright seyferts than a simple power - law model . this two - component model is presented in fig . [ fig51_1 ] . contrary to the uv and optical spectra of agn , there are very few strong spectral lines in their x - ray spectra . the most important one is the fe k@xmath0 line . iron abundance in accretion disks of agn is sufficient to produce very strong emission in this line . the ccd detectors on japanese _ asca _ satellite were the first instruments with sufficient spectral resolution and sensitivity in the x - ray band , by which @xcite obtained the first convincing proof for the existence of the fe k@xmath0 line in agn spectra . this discovery was made after four - day observations of seyfert 1 galaxy mcg-6 - 30 - 15 ( see fig . [ fig52_1 ] ) . line from seyfert 1 galaxy mcg-6 - 30 - 15 observed by _ asca sis _ detector @xcite and the best fit ( blue solid line ) obtained by a model of the accretion disk in schwarzschild metric , extending between 3 and 10 schwarzschild radii @xcite . image credit : tanaka et al . , copyright : nature , 375 , 659 , 1995 . image generated by dr . paul nandra nasa / gsfc . ] the fluorescent / recombination iron k@xmath0 line is an important indicator of accreting flows around compact objects , because it is produced in inner parts of their accretion disks . at the same time , it is the strongest line of the x - ray radiation , and it can be found in the spectra of all types of accreting sources : binary black hole and neutron star systems , cataclysmic variable stars and agn . the fe k@xmath0 line is produced when plasma is subjected to the influence of the hard x - ray radiation so that one of the two @xmath154-shell ( @xmath155 , where @xmath156 is the principal quantum number ) electrons of an iron atom ( or ion ) is ejected following the photoelectric absorption of an x - ray @xcite . the threshold for the absorption by neutral iron is @xmath157 kev @xcite . the resulting excited state decays when an @xmath158-shell ( @xmath159 ) electron drops into the @xmath154-shell , releasing @xmath160 kev of energy . this energy is either emitted as an emission - line photon ( 34% probability ) or internally absorbed by another electron ( 66% probability ) which is consequently ejected from the iron ion ( auger effect ) . the fluorescent yield ( i.e. the probability that photoelectric absorption is followed by fluorescent line emission rather than the auger effect ) is a weak function of the ionization state from neutral iron ( fe i ) up to fe xxiii @xcite . for lithium - like iron ( fe xxiv ) through to hydrogen - like iron ( fe xxvi ) , the lack of at least two electrons in the @xmath158-shell means that the auger effect can not occur . for he and h - like iron ions , the line is produced by the capture of free electrons ( recombination ) and the equivalent fluorescent yield is high and it depends on the plasma conditions @xcite . for the neutral iron , the fe k@xmath0 line energy is 6.4 kev ( more precisely , there are two components of the line @xcite : fe k@xmath138 at 6.404 and fe k@xmath139 at 6.391 kev ) , while in the case of ionization , the energy of both the photoelectric threshold and the fe k@xmath0 line are slightly increased . even for such high ionization states of he and h - like iron ions , the fe k@xmath0 line energy is increased only to @xmath161 and @xmath162 kev , respectively @xcite . fe k@xmath0 line is pretty narrow in itself , but in case when it originates from a relativistically rotating accretion disk of agn it becomes wider due to kinematical effects , and also its shape ( or profile ) is changed due to doppler boosting and gravitational redshift . such broadening of the line is very often observed in spectra of seyfert galaxies and is one of the main evidences for the existence of a relativistic accretion disk which extends deeply in the gravitational field of the central black hole @xcite . if the line originated from an arbitrary radius of a nonrelativistic ( keplerian ) accretion disk it would have a symmetrical profile ( due to doppler effect ) with two peaks : a `` blue '' one which is produced by emitting material from the approaching side of the disk in respect to an observer , and a `` red '' one which corresponds to emitting material from the receding side of the disk . the widest parts of the fe k@xmath0 line arise from the innermost regions of the disk , where the rotation of emitting material is the fastest . using _ asca _ satellite observations , @xcite found that , in case of 14 seyfert 1 galaxies , full - widths at half - maximum ( fwhm ) of their fe k@xmath0 lines correspond to velocities of @xmath163 km / s . in some cases ( e.g. for seyfert 1 galaxy mcg-6 - 30 - 15 ) , fwhm velocity reaches 30% of speed of light ( see e.g. * ? ? ? it means that in the vicinity of the central black hole , orbital velocities of the emitting material are relativistic , causing the enhancement of the fe k@xmath0 line `` blue '' peak in regard to its `` red '' peak ( relativistic beaming ) . taking into account the integral emission in the line over all radii of accretion disk , one can obtain the line with asymmetrical and highly broadened profile @xcite . the `` blue '' peak is then very narrow and bright , while the `` red '' one is wider and much fainter ( see fig . [ fig52_1 ] ) . besides , the gravitational redshift causes further deformations of the fe k@xmath0 line profile by smearing the `` blue '' emission into `` red '' one . since the observed fe k@xmath0 line profiles are strongly affected by such relativistic effects , they represent a fundamental tool for investigating the plasma conditions and the space - time geometry in the vicinity of the supermassive black holes of agn . one of the important features of the fe k@xmath0 line is variability of both , its shape and intensity . observed variations of this line are surprisingly less than those of the high energetic continuum , which is assumed to give rise to the line emission @xcite . also , it seems that there is a lack of corresponding line response to the continuum variations on time scales from several minutes to several days , or that these line and continuum variations are uncorrelated @xcite . in 6 of this chapter we will pay attention to some possible causes of such behavior of the fe k@xmath0 line and x - ray continuum . the disk emission can be analyzed by numerical simulations , based on so called ray - tracing method in kerr metric @xcite , taking into account only photon trajectories reaching the observer s sky plane . in this method one divides the image of the disk on the observer s sky into a number of small elements ( pixels ) . for each pixel , the photon trajectory is traced backward from the observer by following the geodesics in a kerr space - time , until it crosses the plane of the disk ( see fig . [ fig53_1 ] ) . then , the flux density of the radiation emitted by the disk at that point , as well as the redshift factor of the photon are calculated . in that way , one can obtain the color images of the accretion disk which a distant observer would see by a high resolution telescope . the simulated line profiles can be calculated taking into account the intensities and received photon energies of all pixels of the corresponding disk image . all illustrations of the accretion disk and the line shape in this chapter are obtained using such numerical simulations . here we will briefly describe a pseudo - analytical approach of ray - tracing proposed by @xcite . , and observed at a pixel with coordinates ( impact parameters ) @xmath164 on the disk image in the observer s reference frame ( figure courtesy : vesna borka jovanovi ' c ) . ] this method is based on the pseudo - analytical integration of the geodesic equations which describe the photon trajectories in the general case of a rotating black hole having some angular momentum @xmath165 , which gravitational field is therefore described by the kerr metric ( see 3.2 for more details ) . the kerr metric depends on the angular momentum normalized to the mass @xmath38 of black hole : @xmath166 . a photon trajectory in the kerr metric can be described by three constants of motion ( the energy at infinity and two constants related to the angular momentum , respectively ) which have the following forms when natural units @xmath167 are assumed @xcite : @xmath168 , @xmath169 and @xmath170 . here , @xmath171 are the usual boyer - lindquist coordinates and @xmath132 is the 4-momentum . as the trajectory of a photon is independent on its energy , it may be expressed using the two dimensionless parameters @xmath172 and @xmath173 which are very simply related to the two impact parameters @xmath0 and @xmath174 describing the apparent position on the observer s celestial sphere : @xmath175 and @xmath176 , where the sign of @xmath174 is determined by @xmath177 . in order to find the photon trajectories ( null geodesics ) which originate in the accretion disk at some emission radius @xmath178 and reach the observer at infinity , one must solve the following integral equation @xcite : @xmath179 @xmath180 } , \\ \theta \left ( { \theta , \lambda , q } \right ) = q^{2 } + a^{2}\cos ^{2}\theta - \lambda ^{2}\cot ^{2}\theta . \end{array } \label{eq53_2}\ ] ] above integral equation ( [ eq53_1 ] ) can be solved in terms of jacobian elliptic functions , and therefore it is a pseudo - analytical integration . for the exact expressions of the solutions , see e.g. @xcite , or more recent paper from @xcite . due to relativistic effects , photons emitted at frequency @xmath181 will reach infinity at frequency @xmath182 , and their ratio determines the shift due to these effects : @xmath183 . the total observed flux at the observed energy @xmath184 is given by @xcite : @xmath185 where @xmath186 is the disk emissivity , @xmath187 is the solid angle subtended by the disk in the observer s sky and @xmath188 is the rest energy . a simulated accretion disk image is obtained in the following way : 1 . values of the following input parameters are specified : inner and outer radii ( @xmath189 and @xmath190 ) of the disk , angular momentum @xmath61 of the central black hole , observer s viewing angle ( disk inclination ) @xmath191 ( also , often denoted by @xmath192 ) and parameters defining the disk emissivity 2 . constants of motion @xmath9 and @xmath193 are calculated for each pixel on imaginary observer s photographic plate ( i.e. for each pair of impact parameters @xmath0 and @xmath174 ) 3 . geodesic equation ( [ eq53_1 ] ) is integrated for each pair of @xmath9 and @xmath193 4 . values of shift due to relativistic effects @xmath194 and observed flux @xmath195 are calculated 5 . pixels on imaginary observer s photographic plate are colored according to the value of shift @xmath194 and a simulated disk image is obtained . the simulated line profiles can be calculated from the corresponding disk images by binning the observed flux at all pixels over the bins of shift @xmath194 . the examples of simulated disk images obtained in such way are presented in left panels of figs . [ fig54_1 ] - [ fig54_3 ] , and the corresponding simulated line profiles are presented in the right panels of the same figures . in general , black holes have three measurable parameters ( not including the hawking temperature ) : charge , mass ( and hence gravitational field ) and angular momentum ( or spin ) . in the case of supermassive black holes of agn , only the latter two are of sufficient importance because they are responsible for several effects which can be detected in the observed fe k@xmath0 line shapes @xcite . in order to study the size of the fe k@xmath0 line emitting region , as well as its location in the disk , one can assume that the line is emitted from a region in form of a narrow ring . for example , @xcite assumed a line emitting region with width equals to @xmath196 , located between : a ) @xmath197 r@xmath198 and @xmath199 r@xmath198 and b ) @xmath200 r@xmath198 and @xmath201 r@xmath198 . these two cases are presented in fig . [ fig54_1 ] . line emitting region in form of narrow ring with width @xmath202 , extending from : @xmath197 r@xmath198 to @xmath199 r@xmath198 ( top ) and @xmath200 r@xmath198 to @xmath201 r@xmath198 ( bottom ) . _ right : _ the corresponding fe k@xmath0 line profiles @xcite.,title="fig:",scaledwidth=48.0% ] + line emitting region in form of narrow ring with width @xmath202 , extending from : @xmath197 r@xmath198 to @xmath199 r@xmath198 ( top ) and @xmath200 r@xmath198 to @xmath201 r@xmath198 ( bottom ) . _ right : _ the corresponding fe k@xmath0 line profiles @xcite.,title="fig:",scaledwidth=48.0% ] from fig . [ fig54_1 ] one can see how the fe k@xmath0 line profile is changing as the function of distance from central black hole . when the line emitters are located at the lower radii of the disk , i.e. closer to the central black hole , they rotate faster and the line is broader and more asymmetric ( see fig . [ fig54_1 ] top - right ) . if the line emission is originating at larger distances from the black hole , its emitting material is rotating slower and therefore the line becomes narrower and more symmetric ( see fig . [ fig54_1 ] bottom - right ) . in majority of agn , where the broad fe k@xmath0 line is observed , its profile is more similar to the modeled profile as obtained under assumption that the line emitters are located close to the central black hole @xcite . angular momentum or spin of the central supermassive black hole of agn is a property of the space - time metric . to demonstrate how it affects the observed line profiles we will now assume that the fe k@xmath0 line emitting region extends between the following inner and outer radii : @xmath203 and @xmath204 . we will analyze the following two cases for accretion disk inclination in both schwarzschild and kerr metrics : ( i ) @xmath205 and ( ii ) @xmath206 . in the case of schwarzschild metric we have a stationary black hole and hence , angular momentum ( normalized to the mass of black hole ) is @xmath72 . in kerr metric ( i.e. for a rotating black hole ) , it can take any value from the @xmath207 $ ] range , but in these two examples we will assume an almost maximally rotating black hole with @xmath140 . line profiles ( right ) in the case of schwarzschild ( top ) and kerr metric with angular momentum @xmath140 ( bottom ) . the disk inclination is @xmath205 and its inner and outer radii are @xmath203 and @xmath208 r@xmath198 , respectively @xcite.,title="fig : " ] + line profiles ( right ) in the case of schwarzschild ( top ) and kerr metric with angular momentum @xmath140 ( bottom ) . the disk inclination is @xmath205 and its inner and outer radii are @xmath203 and @xmath208 r@xmath198 , respectively @xcite.,title="fig : " ] , but for a highly inclined disk with @xmath206 @xcite.,title="fig : " ] + , but for a highly inclined disk with @xmath206 @xcite.,title="fig : " ] illustrations of an accretion disk and the corresponding fe k@xmath0 line shapes in the first case are presented in fig . [ fig54_2 ] . as one can see from fig . [ fig54_2 ] , the red peak of the fe k@xmath0 line is brighter in case of almost maximally rotating black hole , but at the same time it is also more embedded into the blue peak wing and therefore less separable from it . [ fig54_3 ] contains illustrations of the line emitting regions and the corresponding line shapes in the case of a highly inclined disk ( @xmath206 ) . here , the line profiles are broader than in the first case , mostly due to higher inclination . as it can be seen from fig . [ fig54_3 ] , in the case of the kerr metric , the red peak of the line is again more embedded into its blue peak wing ( as in the first case ) and it confirms that this effect can be most likely attributed to angular momentum @xcite . consequently , angular momentum of the central black hole has significant influence on the line shape which supports assumption that the line originates from the innermost part of accretion disk , close to the central black hole ( see e.g. * ? ? ? this fact can be used for estimation of angular momentum of the central black hole in observed agn . above simulations of the strong gravitational field influence on the fe k@xmath0 line show that such effects can be detected in the observed line shapes and therefore , comparisons between the observed and modeled fe k@xmath0 line profiles ( see e.g. fig . [ fig52_1 ] ) can bring us some essential information about the strong gravitational field in the vicinity of central supermassive black holes of agn @xcite . rapid and irregular variability of the observed x - ray emission in the line , as well as in the continuum , is a common property of all agn . this variability could be due to disk instability , reflecting in perturbations of the disk emissivity , or it could be caused by some external effects , such as gravitational microlensing and absorption by x - ray absorbers . we developed a model of perturbations of the disk emissivity , a model of absorption region and three models of gravitational microlensing . in the following text we will pay more attention to all three mentioned causes of the x - ray variability in agn . in some cases the observed x - ray variability of agn can not be explained by the standard model of accretion disk . for example , in addition to the stable 6.4 kev core of the fe k@xmath0 line , a variable `` red '' feature of the line at 6.1 kev is also detected in x - ray spectrum of seyfert galaxy ngc 3516 ( see fig . [ fig61_1 ] ) , observed by _ xmm - newton _ satellite @xcite . this feature varies systematically in the flux at intervals of 25 ks and in energy between 5.7 and 6.5 kev . @xcite found that the spectral evolution of the `` red '' feature agrees well with hypothesis of an orbiting spot in the accretion disk . line red feature ( middle ) and the 6.4 kev line core ( bottom).,scaledwidth=80.0% ] many processes in the accretion disk may lead to perturbations in its emissivity , such as self gravity , disk - star collisions and baroclinic vorticity @xcite . different models of emissivity perturbing regions can be used to describe the observed variability in the fe k@xmath0 line profiles and intensities , like stochastically perturbed one given by @xcite , but here we will present a bright spot model given by @xcite . in this model a modification of the power - law disk emissivity is proposed in order to explain the observed profiles . the following emissivity law of the disk is assumed : @xmath209 where @xmath210 is the modified disk emissivity at the given position @xmath211 of perturbing region ( in gravitational radii @xmath55 ) , @xmath212 is the power - law disk emissivity at the same position , @xmath213 is emissivity of perturbing region and @xmath214 are its widths ( also in @xmath55 ) . an example of the shape of the perturbed emissivity for an accretion disk in schwarzschild metric , as well as the corresponding perturbed and unperturbed fe k@xmath0 line profiles , are presented in the left and right panels of fig . [ fig61_2 ] , respectively . , @xmath215 and @xmath216 @xcite . _ right : _ the corresponding perturbed ( dashed line ) and unperturbed ( solid line ) fe k@xmath0 line profiles . ] as one can see from fig . [ fig61_2 ] , when perturbation moves along receding side of the disk ( positive direction of @xmath217-axis ) , the perturbing model affects only `` red '' part of the line flux , while the `` blue '' one stays nearly constant , as well as the line core . therefore , this bright spot model of perturbing region could satisfactorily explain the observed variations of the fe k@xmath0 line flux . under assumption that perturbation moves by speed of light @xmath41 , one can also calculate time @xmath218 $ ] that corresponds to the current position @xmath211 of perturbation , using the following expression @xcite : @xmath219 = \dfrac{{r(x_p , y_p ) \left [ { r_g } \right]}}{{c\left [ { m \cdot s^ { - 1 } } \right ] } } = \dfrac{{r_{x , y } \cdot gm_{bh } } } { { c^3 } } , \label{eq61_2}\ ] ] where @xmath220 @xmath40 is newton s gravitational constant and @xmath221 is the mass of central black hole . using the time @xmath218 $ ] we are now able to obtain simulated light curves , produced as perturbation moves along the accretion disk . an example of such light curves , corresponding to displacement of perturbation along the receding side of the disk , is given in fig . [ fig61_3 ] . from this figure it can be seen that displacement of perturbing region results in variations of only `` red '' light curve ( 0.1 6.1 kev ) , while the `` blue '' one ( 6.7 12.8 kev ) and the line core ( 6.1 6.7 kev ) stay nearly constant . ] these variations are then reflected in total line flux in 0.1 12.8 kev energy band @xcite . thus , this perturbing model could explain the variable `` red '' feature of the fe k@xmath0 line observed in ngc 3516 . besides , the realistic durations of disk emissivity perturbations are also obtained if a central supermassive black hole with mass @xmath222 is assumed @xcite . line of seyfert 1 galaxy ngc 3516 , observed by _ asca _ satellite @xcite . the dashed line shows best fit with model of an accretion disk around a rotating ( kerr ) black hole.,scaledwidth=80.0% ] the x - ray emission of agn could be also significantly absorbed by an outflowing wind , especially in case of so - called low ionization broad absorption line ( lobal ) quasars . recent observations of such quasars ( e.g. mrk 231 @xcite and h 1413 + 117 @xcite ) confirmed the presence of x - ray absorbers in these objects . @xcite detected an absorption line at 5.8 kev in nearby ( @xmath223 ) seyfert 1.5 galaxy ngc 4151 . a variable absorption line at the same energy has been discovered by @xcite in ngc 3516 ( fig . [ fig62_1 ] ) and was interpreted as a fe k resonant absorption line , redshifted either by infalling absorbing material or by strong gravity in the vicinity of the black hole . @xcite found an evidence for a p cygni profile of the fe k@xmath0 line ( fig . [ fig62_2 ] ) in narrow line seyfert 1 galaxies . according to these authors , complex x - ray spectra of these objects show strong `` soft excess '' below 2 kev and a sharp drop at @xmath224 kev which can be explained either by reflection or by absorption from relativistic , partially ionized material close to the black hole . they showed that a sharp feature at @xmath224 kev results from absorption / scattering / emission of the iron k@xmath0 line in the wind . in the case of 1h 0707 - 495 ( fig . [ fig62_2 ] ) , this absorption feature can be satisfactorily fitted by the p cygni profile @xcite . there are different models of the x - ray absorbing / obscuring regions , like absorbing medium comprised of cold absorbing cloudlets by @xcite , but here we will focus on the model given by @xcite , developed in order to study how much warm absorbers can change the fe k@xmath0 spectral line profile , emitted from a relativistic accretion disk . in this model , absorption region is considered to be composed of a number of individual spherical absorbing clouds with the same small radii ( see fig . [ fig62_3 ] left ) , scattered in space so that projections of their centers to the observer s sky plane @xmath225 have bivariate normal distribution @xmath226 . here , @xmath227^t$ ] and @xmath228 $ ] , where @xmath229 and @xmath230 are the means of @xmath231 and @xmath232 , @xmath233 and @xmath234 are their standard deviations and @xmath235 is the correlation between them . absorbing region presented in fig . [ fig62_3 ] ( left ) is obtained for the following parameters : @xmath236 , @xmath237 , @xmath238 and @xmath239 , where @xmath240 is the center and @xmath241 is the radius of projection of entire absorbing region . spectral line profile ( solid line ) and corresponding absorbed profile ( dotted line ) caused by the absorbing / obscuring region presented in the left panel @xcite . ] the absorption coefficient @xmath242 for every spherical cloud in the absorbing region is given by @xcite : @xmath243 where absorption intensity coefficient @xmath244 describes the distribution of absorption over the whole region , @xmath245 is the central energy of absorption and @xmath246 is the width of absorption band ( velocity dispersion ) . a comparison between the unabsorbed fe k@xmath0 spectral line profile and the corresponding absorbed profile obtained by this absorption model is given in fig . [ fig62_3 ] ( right ) . as it can be seen from fig . [ fig62_3 ] , when the x - ray radiation from approaching side of the disk is significantly absorbed / obscured by the absorbing region , there is a very strong absorption of the iron line . in such case the emission fe k@xmath0 line looks redshifted at @xmath247 kev and is followed by a strong absorption line at @xmath248 kev ( fig . [ fig62_3 ] right ) , which indicates the p cygni profile of the iron line . thus , this model can satisfactorily explain the p cygni profile of the fe k@xmath0 line in the case when approaching side of the accretion disk is partially blocked from our view by the x - ray absorbing / obscuring material , while the rest of the disk is less absorbed / obscured and therefore is visible @xcite . some recent observational and theoretical studies suggest that gravitational microlensing can also induce variability in the x - ray emission of agn , especially in the case of gravitationally lensed quasars . the phenomenology of gravitational lensing effects and introduction to this field has been given in several review papers and books . references to some of them can be found in e.g. @xcite . therefore , in this section we will not discuss all aspects of such effects in the universe , but instead , we will briefly present the basic concepts of gravitational microlensing theory , as well as some examples for microlensing influence on the x - ray emission from agn . gravitational lensing is an universal natural phenomenon where the gravitational force of lensing object induce either the amplification of some background source ( * microlensing * ) , or the appearance of its multiple images ( * macrolensing * ) , due to light bending in a gravitational field of the deflector . separation angle between the images of background source depends on the mass of gravitational lens and therefore , multiple images can be observed only in the case of a massive lensing object , such as galaxy . one of the most famous multiple image lens systems is quasar qso 2237 + 0305 , also known as einstein cross , which is located at redshift @xmath249 ( see fig . [ fig63_0 ] ) . its four images are due to lensing effect of galaxy zw2237 + 030 , located between us and the quasar at redshift @xmath250 . in the case of a small mass lens ( e.g. a star ) , the separation angle is also small and therefore , different images of background source can not be resolved . instead , its intensity is amplified , causing the changes in the observed light curve . common name for both , macrolensing ( or simply lensing ) and microlensing is * strong lensing * , contrary to * weak lensing * , which causes distortions in observed images of distant objects which can be then used for studying the mass distribution along the line of sight , but such phenomena will not be discussed here . @xcite found that cosmologically distributed microlenses could significantly contribute to the x - ray variability of high - redshifted ( @xmath251 ) qsos . indeed , microlensing of the fe k@xmath0 line has been reported at least in three macrolensed qsos : mg j0414 + 0534 @xcite , qso 2237 + 0305 @xcite , and h 1413 + 117 @xcite . @xcite detected an increase of the fe k@xmath0 equivalent width in the image b of mg j0414 + 0534 which was not followed by the continuum and explained this behavior by assumption that the thermal emission region of the disk and the compton up - scattered emission region of the hard x - ray source lie within smaller radii than the iron - line reprocessing region . analyzing the x - ray variability of qso 2237 + 0305a , @xcite also measured amplification of the fe k@xmath0 line in component a of qso 2237 + 0305 but not in the continuum and suggested that the larger size of the continuum emission region in comparison to the fe k@xmath0 emission region could explain this result . in the case of h 1413 + 117 , @xcite found that the continuum and the fe k@xmath0 line were enhanced by a different factor . for more detailed discussion about observational and theoretical investigations of the x - ray variability in gravitationally lensed qsos see e.g. @xcite and @xcite , and also references therein . the influence of gravitational microlensing on the x - ray emission from a compact accretion disk of agn can be studied using numerical simulations based on ray - tracing method described in 5.3 of this chapter . in the following text we will briefly review three models of gravitational microlenses ( point - like , straight - fold caustic and quadruple microlens ) , as well as their influence on the x - ray radiation of agn . if @xmath252 and @xmath253 are the impact parameters ( i.e. the coordinates ) which describe the apparent position of each point of the accretion disk image on the celestial sphere as seen by an observer at infinity , then the amplified brightness ( due to gravitational microlensing influence ) is given by @xcite : @xmath254 where @xmath255 ( @xmath130 and @xmath182 are the transition and observed frequencies , respectively ) , @xmath256 is the shift due to relativistic effects ( @xmath181 is the emitted frequency ) , @xmath257 is the disk emissivity and @xmath258 is the amplification caused by microlensing . usually , we do not know the exact form of @xmath258 , so we are forced to consider the different approximations in order to estimate this quantity . the first of these approximations is called * point - like microlens * , and it is applied when an isolated compact object ( e.g. a star ) plays a role of gravitational microlens . such microlens is characterized by its einstein ring radius in the lens plane @xcite : @xmath259 or by the corresponding projection to the source plane : @xmath260 where @xmath40 is the gravitational constant , @xmath41 is the speed of light , @xmath261 is the microlens mass and @xmath262 , @xmath263 and @xmath264 are the cosmological angular distances between observer - lens , observer - source and lens - source , respectively . in this case , the amplification is given by the following relation @xcite : @xmath265 where @xmath266 corresponds to the angular separation between the microlens and a source . @xmath267 are the coordinates of the microlens with respect to the disk center ( given in @xmath55 ) . the total observed flux is then given by @xcite : @xmath268 where @xmath269 is the solid angle subtended by the disk in the observer s sky and the integral extends over the whole disk image . an illustration of a point - like gravitational microlens crossing over an accretion disk in the kerr metric with angular momentum @xmath140 is presented in fig . [ fig63_1 ] @xcite . the simulated unamplified and amplified fe k@xmath0 line profiles due to different positions of the microlens are shown in fig . [ fig63_2 ] @xcite . einstein ring of the microlens is schematically presented by yellow euclidian circle.,scaledwidth=75.0% ] from fig . [ fig63_2 ] it can be seen that point - like microlens could induce strong changes of the fe k@xmath0 line shape and intensity , depending on the location of the microlens . in the first place , we have in mind the changes in number of peaks , their relative separation and the peak velocity . secondly , such transit of the point - like microlens could cause an asymmetrical enhancement of the line profile , and the maximum of the amplification would be obtained for negative values of @xmath217-coordinate , i.e. for the approaching side of the rotating accretion disk , and therefore it would affect mainly the blue part of the fe k@xmath0 line . line profiles ( solid line ) for different positions of the point - like microlens , which coordinates ( expressed in @xmath55 ) in respect to the accretion disk center are given at the top of each panel @xcite . the simulations are performed for an accretion disk in kerr metric with angular momentum @xmath140 and with the following disk parameters : r@xmath270 , r@xmath271 , @xmath205 , q=2.5 . the einstein ring radius of the point - like microlens is 10 r@xmath272 . the relative intensity ( @xmath273-axis ) is in the range from 0 to 3 , and energy shift @xmath194 due to relativistic effects ( @xmath217-axis ) is in the range from 0.4 to 1.2 . ] in most cases we can not simply consider that microlensing is caused by an isolated compact object , but we should take into account that such micro - deflector is located in an extended object ( typically , the lens galaxy ) . therefore , when the size of the microlens projected einstein ring radius is larger than the size of the accretion disk and when a number of microlenses form a caustic net , we describe the microlensing effects by a * straight - fold caustic * approximation @xcite , where the amplification at a point of an extended source ( accretion disk ) close to the caustic is given by @xcite : @xmath274 in above expression @xmath275 is the amplification outside the caustic and @xmath276 is the caustic amplification factor , where @xmath174 is constant of order of unity . @xmath277 is the distance perpendicular to the caustic and @xmath278 is the minimum distance from the disk center to the caustic ( both in @xmath55 ) . the `` caustic size '' @xmath279 is the distance @xmath277 for which the caustic amplification is equal to 1 , and therefore this parameter defines a typical linear scale for the caustic . @xmath280 is the heaviside function which equals 1 for @xmath281 and otherwise it is 0 . @xmath282 is @xmath283 depending on the direction of caustic motion : if the direction of the caustic motion is from approaching side of the disk @xmath284 , otherwise it is + 1 . also , in the special case of caustic crossing perpendicular to the rotating axis @xmath285 for direction of caustic motion from @xmath286 to @xmath287 , otherwise it is @xmath288 . a microlensing event where a caustic crosses over an accretion disk can be described in the following way @xcite : before the caustic reaches the disk , the amplification is equal to @xmath275 because the heaviside function of eq . ( [ eq63_4 ] ) is zero . just as the caustic begins to cross the disk , the amplification rises rapidly and then decays gradually towards @xmath275 as the source moves away from the caustic - fold . an illustration of the straight - fold caustic crossing over an accretion disk in schwarzschild metric is presented in fig . [ fig63_3 ] , and the corresponding effects on the shapes of the x - ray continuum and the fe k@xmath0 line are shown in fig . [ fig63_4 ] @xcite . as it can be seen from fig . [ fig63_4 ] , caustics could also induce significant amplifications of both , the x - ray continuum and fe k@xmath0 line . , scaledwidth=75.0% ] line ( right ) due to influence of straight - fold caustic from fig . [ fig63_3 ] . undeformed profiles are presented by solid and deformed by dotted lines @xcite.[fig63_4 ] ] the most complex approximation for gravitational microlensing amplification is so called * quadruple microlens*. this model is applied to obtain a spatial distribution of magnifications in the source plane ( where an accretion disk of agn is located ) , produced by a random star field placed in the lens plane . such spatial distribution of magnifications is called * microlensing map , microlensing pattern or caustic network*. if we consider a set of @xmath289 compact objects ( e.g. stars ) which are characterized by their positions @xmath290 and their masses @xmath291 , then the normalized lens equation is given by @xcite : @xmath292\vec x , \label{eq63_5}\ ] ] where @xmath293 and @xmath294 are the normalized image and source positions , respectively . the sum describes the light deflection by the stars and the last term is a quadruple contribution from the galaxy containing the stars , where @xmath295 is a smooth surface mass density and @xmath1 is an external shear . the total surface mass density or convergence can be written as @xmath296 , where @xmath297 represents the contribution from the compact microlenses . the corresponding microlensing map is then defined by two parameters : the convergence - @xmath282 , and the shear due to the external mass - @xmath1 . for some specific lensing event one can model the corresponding magnification map using numerical simulations based on ray - shooting techniques ( see e.g. @xcite and references therein ) , in which the rays are shot from the observer to the source , through the randomly generated star field in the lens plane . an example of a magnification map for a `` typical '' lens system ( i.e. for a lens system where the redshifts of microlens and source are @xmath298 and @xmath299 , respectively ) is presented in the left panel of fig . [ fig63_5 ] , and the corresponding x - ray , uv and optical continuum variations are given in the right panel of the same figure @xcite . the size of this magnification map is @xmath300 and it is generated using the following arbitrary values for convergence and shear : @xmath301 and @xmath302 . the light curves in the right panel of fig . [ fig63_5 ] are produced when an accretion disk crosses over the magnification pattern in the left panel , along the path denoted by the white solid line . as one can see from fig . [ fig63_5 ] ( right ) , the variations of the x - ray continuum due to microlensing are much stronger and faster in comparison to the variations in uv and optical spectral bands @xcite . usually , so called high amplification events , i.e. asymmetric peaks in the light curves are also analyzed @xcite . the results presented in fig . [ fig63_5 ] ( right ) show that the rise times of such events are the shortest and their frequency the highest in the x - rays , in comparison to the uv / optical spectral bands . in order to explain the observed x - ray variability in gravitationally lensed quasars , @xcite considered a microlensing magnification map for a specific case of the qso 2237 + 0305a image ( fig . [ fig63_6 ] , top ) . this map with @xmath303 on a side was generated using the following parameters : @xmath304 , @xmath305 and the mean mass of randomly distributed deflectors @xmath306 . the corresponding variations of the total fe k@xmath0 line and x - ray continuum fluxes are presented in fig . [ fig63_6 ] ( bottom ) . on a side and a scheme of an accretion disk with separated fe k@xmath0 line and x - ray continuum emitting regions which outer radii are 20 and 100 r@xmath272 , respectively @xcite . the straight horizontal line represents a path of the disk center . _ bottom : _ the corresponding amplifications of the fe k@xmath0 line and x - ray continuum total fluxes for different positions of the disk center along the path on the magnification map in the left panel.,title="fig:",scaledwidth=75.0% ] + on a side and a scheme of an accretion disk with separated fe k@xmath0 line and x - ray continuum emitting regions which outer radii are 20 and 100 r@xmath272 , respectively @xcite . the straight horizontal line represents a path of the disk center . _ bottom : _ the corresponding amplifications of the fe k@xmath0 line and x - ray continuum total fluxes for different positions of the disk center along the path on the magnification map in the left panel.,title="fig : " ] as one can see from fig . [ fig63_6 ] ( bottom ) , there is a global correlation between the total line and continuum fluxes during the complete simulated microlensing event , but while the continuum flux variations are smooth and slow , the line flux varies much stronger and faster @xcite . moreover , there is a certain period in the middle of the microlensing event in which the fe k@xmath0 line flux changes rapidly , while the continuum flux remains nearly constant . this indicates that different behavior of the line and x - ray continuum variability , observed in some lensed quasars @xcite , may be explained by microlensing hypothesis if the line originates from the innermost part of the accretion disk , while the x - ray continuum is emitted from a larger region in the disk @xcite . on the basis of all facts presented in this section , one can conclude that gravitational microlensing can produce significant variations and amplifications of the fe k@xmath0 line and x - ray continuum . during a microlensing event , even very small mass objects could produce noticeable changes in the x - ray radiation from accretion disks of agn . these changes are significantly larger than the corresponding effects in the optical and uv emission . also , microlensing hypothesis can satisfactorily explain the excess in the iron line emission , observed in some gravitational lens systems . in this chapter we discussed the x - ray radiation from relativistic accretion disks around supermassive black holes , supposed to exist in the centers of all active galactic nuclei . the x - ray radiation is created when the accreting material loses its angular momentum due to friction between the adjacent layers in the disk and spiral towards the central black hole , releasing the gravitational energy . part of this energy increases the kinetic energy of rotation and the rest is turned into the radiation , which is then emitted from the disk surface in the x - ray , uv and optical spectral bands . it is the only known mechanism of converting gravitational potential energy into radiation , which is sufficiently efficient to explain the high luminosities of some observed agn . the standard model of an accretion disk , including its emission , accretion rate , luminosity , structure and spectral distribution was described in details . a significant part of this chapter was devoted to modeling of the observed x - ray radiation in both the fe k@xmath0 spectral line and x - ray continuum . the modeled x - ray radiation is then used to analyze the several effects of strong gravity in the vicinity of black holes which have the influence on the shapes and intensities of the observed fe k@xmath0 line and x - ray continum . we showed that the x - ray emission strongly depends on the angular momentum and mass of the central black hole , as well as on several parameters describing the x - ray emitting region in the disk . this was demonstrated on several examples , showing various aspects of the x - ray emission from the accretion disk around schwarzschild and kerr black holes . since the x - ray radiation is probably produced in a very compact region near the black holes , such comparison between observed and modeled x - ray radiation can provide us some essential information about the plasma conditions and the space - time geometry in the vicinity of those black holes . we also studied some possible causes for the rapid and irregular variability of the fe k@xmath0 line and x - ray continuum , observed in the x - ray spectra of some agn . our results show that , at least , three mechanisms could explain such variability : perturbations of disk emissivity , absorption by warm x - ray absorbers and gravitational microlensing . taking all this into account , we can conclude that the x - ray emission from accretion disks of agn can be used as a powerful tool for revealing the physics and geometry in the vicinity of their central supermassive black holes . but , to use the fe k@xmath0 line profile for such investigations , one should also take into account the effects which can disturb its profile ( such as e.g. absorption , perturbations in the disk and gravitational lensing ) . braito , v. , della ceca , r. , piconcelli , e. , severgnini , p. , bassani , l. , cappi , m. , franceschini , a. , iwasawa , k. , malaguti , g. , marziani , p. , palumbo , g. g. c. , persic , m. , risaliti , g. , salvati , m. _ a&a _ , 2004 , _ 420 _ , 79 Abstract:

Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.

Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered . Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video . Paper: in multi - user mimo systems , one main challenge is the increased complexity and energy consumption of the signal processing to mitigate the interferences between multiple co - channel users . to achieve energy efficient transmission , the multi - user mimo system with very large antenna arrays at each base station ( known as `` massive mimo '' system ) has been advocated recently @xcite . the key result is that , with very large antenna arrays at each base station , both the intracell and intercell interferences can be substantially reduced with simple linear beamforming ( bf ) processing @xcite . on the other hand , full - duplex relaying ( fdr ) is a promising approach to improve the spectral efficiency ( se ) of relaying network while retains the merits of half - duplex relaying ( hdr ) ( e.g. , path loss reduction ) . in fdr , the relay transmits and receives simultaneously at the same frequency and time , but at the cost of a strong echo interference ( ei ) due to signal leakage between the relay output and input @xcite . to mitigate ei , three approaches have been investigated , i.e. , 1 ) passive cancellation , 2 ) time - domain cancellation @xcite and 3 ) spatial suppression @xcite . the passive cancellation relies on a combination of path loss , cross - polarization and antenna directionality @xcite . the time - domain cancellation is based on the fact that ei signal is known at full - duplex node . thus , it can be regenerated and removed in time - domain @xcite . in spatial suppression , ei is mitigated with the multiple transmit / receive antennas by approaches such as null - space projection @xcite . inspired by these works , a number of works have dedicated to the study of fdr protocol on both theory and testbed ( see @xcite and the references therein ) . to achieve spectral and energy efficient transmissions of multiple source - destination pairs , recent works sought to incorporate both hdr @xcite and fdr @xcite-@xcite with massive mimo . however , the aforementioned works on massive mimo are actually based on the assumption that the base stations or relays are equipped with a large number of high - quality transmit / receive radio frequency ( rf ) chains ( which are expensive and power - hungry ) . in contrast to conventional mimo system ( e.g. , at most 8 antennas in lte system ) , massive mimo must be built with low - cost components @xcite since the deploy cost and energy consumption of circuits will increase dramatically as the number of antennas grows very large . such low - cost components are prone to hardware imperfections ( e.g. , phase noise , nonlinear power amplifier , i / q imbalance , nonlinear low - noise amplifier and adc impairments ) , which must be considered in the design of practical massive mimo system . this paper focuses on the transceiver design for massive mimo full - duplex relaying ( mm - fdr ) with hardware impairments . the effect of hardware impairments is modeled using transmit / receive distortion noises @xcite . there are several challenges in the design of practical transceiver scheme in the considered system . the first is : _ how to deal with the ei cancellation without instantaneous ei channel ? _ ei cancellation is a critical problem in mm - fdr transceiver design which is not only important to reduce ei power , but also useful to reduce distortion noises caused by hardware impairments at the relay ( as will be shown in section iv ) . different from fdr with small - scale relay antenna arrays @xcite-@xcite , the instantaneous ei channel is usually not easy to obtain in mm - fdr . this is because the learning of ei channel requires training sequence with length not less than the number of relay antennas @xcite , which is prohibitive in mm - fdr as the channel coherent time is limited . the lack of ei channel makes traditional ei cancellation techniques ( e.g. , time - domain cancellation and spatial suppression ) difficult to apply . although passive cancellation does not relies on ei channel estimation , it usually can not provide satisfactory performance when used alone @xcite . another problem is : _ how to suppress distortion noises caused by hardware impairments at sources and destinations . _ different from multi - user interference ( mui ) , the distortion noise caused by transmit imperfection of source can be viewed as an interference signal with the same channel as transmit data . thus , it can not be suppressed by relay antenna arrays during coherent combining ( similar problem appears in reception at destinations ) . this causes performance ceiling on achievable rate as the number of relay antennas grows large , which degrades the gain of massive mimo significantly . in this paper , we propose practical transceiver scheme for mm - fdr with hardware impairments considering the above problems . different from the traditional mm - fdr protocol @xcite ( where sources and destinations are equipped with single antenna ) , we consider a general model where sources and destinations are allowed to equip with multiple antennas . the contributions are summarized as follows : * we first examine the limitation of traditional mm - fdr protocol under hardware impairments . in particular , we derive the upper bound on end - to - end achievable rate for traditional mm - fdr protocol with linear processing at the relay . the bound reveals that the achievable rate is limited by the hardware impairments at the sources and destinations , and performance ceiling appears as the number of relay antenna grows large . the result also implies that it is impossible to cancel the `` ceiling effect '' with linear processing , if sources and destinations are only equipped with single antenna . * based on the upper bound analysis , we propose a hardware impairments aware transceiver scheme ( hia scheme ) to mitigate the distortion noises by exploiting the statistical channel knowledge and antennas arrays of sources / destinations . the scheme needs no instantaneous knowledge of ei channel . the asymptotic end - to - end achievable rate of mm - fdr with hia scheme ( hia - mm - fdr ) is derived and the scaling behaviors of mui , ei and distortion noises are determined . * a joint degree of freedom and power optimization ( jdpo ) algorithm is presented to further improve the se of hia - mm - fdr . the paper is organized as follows . in section ii , we review the related work . the system model is described in section iii . the upper bound of achievable rate is analyzed in section iv . the hia scheme is proposed in section v and the jdpo algorithm is presented in section vi . simulation results are presented in section vii and some conclusions will be drawn at last . : @xmath0 and @xmath1 denote the expectation and variance . @xmath2 is @xmath3 identity matrix . @xmath4 , @xmath5 and @xmath6 denote conjugate , transpose and conjugate - transpose , respectively . @xmath7 , @xmath8 , @xmath9_{ij}$ ] , @xmath10 and @xmath11 denote the spectral radius , trace , @xmath12th element of matrix , @xmath13th largest eigenvalue and eigenvector with respect to @xmath13th largest eigenvalue of matrix @xmath14 , respectively . @xmath15 scales with @xmath16 means @xmath17 . the design and performance of using unlimited number of antennas at the base station in cellular system were first considered for independent antennas @xcite , and soon extended to the scenarios with spatial correlated antennas @xcite-@xcite . the asymptotic sinr for single cell cellular system was analyzed in @xcite . it has been shown that , with very large antenna arrays at the base station , a deterministic sinr ( also called the `` deterministic equivalent '' of sinr ) which depends only on the large - scale fading of channels can be achieved , if the transmit power is scaled by @xmath18 with perfect csi and @xmath19 with imperfect csi ( @xmath18 denotes the number of base station antennas ) . the authors in @xcite-@xcite have done considerable work to derive the `` deterministic equivalent '' of sinr for massive mimo system with spatial correlated antennas . in the field of massive mimo relaying , the se and ee of hdr with very large relay antenna arrays were investigated in @xcite . the mm - fdr with decode - and - forward ( df ) relay was first introduced in @xcite , and analyzed in end - to - end achievable rate as linear processing is employed . the asymptotic performance of amplify - and - forward based mm - fdr was considered in @xcite and the scaling behavior of the infinitely repeating echo interference was determined . only a few works considered the effect of hardware impairments on massive mimo system . a constant envelope signal design has been proposed in @xcite to facilitate the use of power - efficient rf power amplifiers . the authors in @xcite presented a low peak - to - average - power ratio ( par ) precoding solution to enable efficient implementation using non - linear rf components in massive mimo system . in fdr with small - scale antennas , the optimal precoding under limited adc dynamic range was studied in @xcite . however , these works can not provide much insight for the effect of hardware impairments on mm - fdr . consider the network with @xmath20 source - destination ( s - d ) pairs and a single full - duplex relay @xmath21 , where source @xmath22 wishes to communicate with destination @xmath23 ( @xmath24 ) with the help of @xmath21 . the relay adopts the df policy . it is assumed that the sources and destinations are equipped with @xmath25 and @xmath26 antennas respectively , while the relay is equipped with @xmath27 antennas ( @xmath28 for reception and @xmath29 for transmission ) . we are interested in the large-@xmath30 regime , i.e. , @xmath31 . @xmath25 , @xmath26 and @xmath20 can be either fixed or scale with @xmath32 . let @xmath33 be the channel matrix from @xmath22 to receive antenna array of relay and let @xmath34 be the channel matrix from @xmath23 to transmit array of relay . let @xmath35 denote the ei channel matrix between transmit and receive arrays of relay . the spatial correlation of each mimo channel is characterized by the kronecker model @xcite . thus , @xmath36 can be expressed as @xmath37 , where @xmath38 represents the large - scale fading . @xmath39 and @xmath40 characterize the spatial correlation of received signals across receive array of relay and that of transmitted signals across transmit array of @xmath22 . @xmath41 consists of the random components of channels whose elements are i.i.d with distribution @xmath42 . based on the same model , the channel matrices @xmath43 and @xmath44 can be expressed as @xmath45 and @xmath46 . to facilitate the analysis , we assume the following conditions on correlation matrices , i.e. , @xmath47 , where @xmath48 , * * a1 * : the spectral radius of @xmath49 is bounded by a constant , i.e. , @xmath50 . * * a2 * : @xmath49 is a hermitian and teoplitz matrix and has unit diagonal elements . the former is a common assumption in the studies of massive mimo which follows from energy conservation @xcite and * a2 * corresponds to the case of uniform linear array ( ula ) @xcite . to characterize the effect of hardware imperfections , we adopt the new signal model from @xcite . we model the effect of imperfect transmit rf chain by adding , per transmit antenna , an independent zero - mean gaussian `` transmit distortion noise '' , whose power is proportional to the signal power transmitted at that antenna . the experimental results in @xcite have shown that the independent gaussian distortion noise model closely captures the joint effect of imperfect components in transmit rf chain . let @xmath51 \in \mathbb c^{n_s\times 1}$ ] and @xmath52\in \mathbb c^{n_t\times 1}$ ] denote the transmit vectors of source @xmath22 and relay at time instant @xmath53 . based on the above model , the distorted transmit signals can be expressed as @xmath54 = { { \mathbf{x}}_{s , k}}\left [ u \right ] + { { \mathbf{t}}_{s , k}}\left [ u \right ] \hspace{.5em } { \rm and } \hspace{.5em } { { \mathbf{\tilde x}}_r}\left [ u \right ] = { { \mathbf{x}}_r}\left [ u \right ] + { { \mathbf{t}}_r}\left [ u \right]\ ] ] where the distortion noises @xmath55\sim { \cal cn}\left ( { 0,{\nu _ { s , k}}{\text{diag}}\left ( { \mathbb{e}\left [ { { { \mathbf{x}}_{s , k}}\left [ u \right]{\mathbf{x}}_{s , k}^h\left [ u \right ] } \right ] } \right ) } \right)$ ] and @xmath56\sim{\cal c}{\cal n}\left ( 0,\nu _ r \times \right.$ ] @xmath57{{\bf{x}}_r^h}\left [ u \right ] } \right ] } \right ) \right)$ ] . note that @xmath58 ( @xmath59 ) characterizes the level of transmit imperfection . for example , @xmath60 ( @xmath61 ) corresponds to the conventional assumption of perfect transmit rf chains . the quality of transmit rf chains degrades as @xmath62 ( @xmath63 ) increases . we model the effect of imperfect receive rf chain by adding , per receive antenna , an independent zero - mean gaussian `` receive distortion noise '' , whose variance is proportional to the signal power received at that antenna . more precisely , let @xmath64\in \mathbb c^{n_r\times 1}$ ] and @xmath65 \in \mathbb c^{n_d\times 1}$ ] be the undistorted received signals of the relay and destination @xmath23 at time instant @xmath53 , the distorted received signals can be expressed as @xmath66 = { { \bf{y}}_r}\left [ u \right ] + { { \bf{r}}_r}\left [ u \right ] \hspace{.5em } { \rm and } \hspace{.5em } { { { \bf{\tilde y}}}_{d , k}}\left [ u \right ] = { { \bf{y}}_{d , k}}\left [ u \right ] + { { \bf{r}}_{d , k}}\left [ u \right ] \end{aligned}\ ] ] where the distortion noises @xmath67 \sim { \cal c}{\cal n } ( { 0,{\mu _ r}{\rm{diag } } ( { { \mathbb{e } } [ { { { \bf{y}}_r } [ u ] { { \bf{y}}_r^h } [ u ] } ] } ) } ) $ ] and @xmath68 \sim{\cal cn } ( 0,{\mu _ { d , k } } { \text{diag } } ( { \mathbb{e } [ { { { \mathbf{y}}_{d , k } } [ u ] { \mathbf{y}}_{d , k}^h [ u ] } ] } ) ) $ ] . @xmath69 ( @xmath70 ) characterizes the level of receive imperfection . the experimental studies in @xcite have shown that the independent gaussian noise model is a good approximation to the joint effect of imperfect components in receive rf chain . at time instant @xmath53 , all sources transmit signals @xmath71 $ ] ( @xmath72 ) to the relay simultaneously . meanwhile , the relay broadcasts the decoded signals to the destinations . based on the models in ( [ 2 - 3 ] ) and ( [ 2 - 4 ] ) , the received signals at the relay and @xmath23 can be expressed as @xmath73 = \sum\limits_{k = 1}^k { { \mathbf{h}}_{sr , k}}\left ( { { { \mathbf{x}}_{s , k}}\left [ u \right ] + { { \mathbf{t}}_{s , k}}\left [ u \right ] } \right ) \\ & + { { \mathbf{h}}_{ei}}\left ( { { { \mathbf{x}}_r}\left [ u \right ] + { { \mathbf{t}}_r}\left [ u \right ] } \right ) + { { \mathbf{r}}_r}\left [ u \right ] + { { \mathbf{n}}_r}\left [ u \right ] \\ & { { \mathbf{\tilde y}}_{d , k}}\left [ u \right ] = { \mathbf{h}}_{rd , k}^h\left ( { { { \mathbf{x}}_r}\left [ u \right ] + { { \mathbf{t}}_r}\left [ u \right ] } \right ) + { { \mathbf{r}}_{d , k}}\left [ u \right ] + { { \mathbf{n}}_{d , k}}\left [ u \right ] \end{aligned}\ ] ] to keep the complexity low , it is assumed that a singe data steam is transmitted at each source and each node employs only linear processing . in particular , @xmath22 transmits the unit - power symbol @xmath74 $ ] using the unitary bf vector @xmath75 . therefore , the transmit vector of @xmath22 can be expressed as @xmath71 = \sqrt{e_{s , k}}{\bf p}_{s , k } s_k[u]$ ] , where @xmath76 denotes the transmit power . relay combines the received signal by multiplying the receive bf matrix @xmath77 $ ] , i.e. , @xmath78 = { \bf{w}}_r^h{{{\bf{\tilde y}}}_r}\left [ u \right]$ ] . the @xmath79th element of @xmath78 $ ] @xmath80 = \sqrt{e_{s , k}}{\mathbf{w}}_{r , k}^h{{\mathbf{h}}_{sr , k}}{{\mathbf{p}}_{s , k}}{s_k}\left [ u \right ] \\ & + \sqrt{e_{s , j } } \sum\limits_{j = 1,j \ne k}^k { { \mathbf{w}}_{r , k}^h{{\mathbf{h}}_{sr , j}}{{\mathbf{p}}_{s , j}}{s_j}\left [ u \right ] } + { \mathbf{w}}_{r , k}^h\sum\limits_{j = 1}^k { { { \mathbf{h}}_{sr , j}}{{\mathbf{t}}_{s , j}}\left [ u \right ] } \\ & + { \bf{w}}_{r , k}^h{{\bf{h}}_{ei}}\left ( { { { \bf{x}}_r}\left [ u \right ] + { { \bf{t}}_r}\left [ u \right ] } \right ) + { \bf{w}}_{r , k}^h{{\bf{r}}_r}\left [ u \right ] + { \bf{w}}_{r , k}^h{{\bf{n}}_r}\left [ u \right ] \end{aligned}\ ] ] is used to decode the symbol of @xmath22 . the relay forwards the decoded symbol using transmit bf matrix @xmath81 $ ] . the transmit vector of the relay can be expressed as @xmath82\ ! = \ ! { { \mathbf{w}}_t}{\mathbf{\lambda } _ r^{1/2}}{\mathbf{s}}\left [ { u - d } \right]$ ] , where @xmath83\!=\![{{s_1}}\left [ { u - d } \right ] , \cdots,{{s_k}}\left [ { u - d } \right]]^t$ ] and @xmath84 is the power allocation matrix at the relay . @xmath85 denotes the processing delay of the relay . to meet the relay s power constraint , @xmath82 $ ] must satisfy @xmath86{\bf{x}}_r^h\left [ u \right ] } \right ] } \right ) \!\ ! = \!\ ! \sum_{l = 1}^k { { e_{r , l } } } \!\!\le\ ! \!e_r^{\rm max}$ ] . @xmath23 uses the unitary bf vector @xmath87 to combine the received signal @xmath88 $ ] . the combined signal is expressed as @xmath89 = \sqrt{e_{r , k}}{\mathbf{p}}_{d , k}^h{\mathbf{h}}_{rd , k}^h{{\mathbf{w}}_{t , k}}{s_k}\left [ { u - d } \right ] \\ & + { \mathbf{p}}_{d , k}^h\sum\limits_{j = 1,j \ne k}^k \sqrt{e_{r , j } } { { \mathbf{h}}_{rd , k}^h{{\mathbf{w}}_{t , j}}{s_j}\left [ { u - d } \right ] } \\ & + { \mathbf{p}}_{d , k}^h{\mathbf{h}}_{rd , k}^h{{\mathbf{t}}_r}\left [ u \right ] + { \mathbf{p}}_{d , k}^h{{\mathbf{r}}_{d , k}}\left [ u \right ] + { \mathbf{p}}_{d , k}^h{{\mathbf{n}}_{d , k}}\left [ u \right ] \end{aligned}\ ] ] this section analyzes the upper bound on achievable rate of mm - fdr with single antenna sources and destinations . the goal is to reveal the fundamental limitation of previous mm - fdr protocol with single antenna sources and destinations in combating distortion noises . moreover , the bound provides us important insight on the design of practical transceiver scheme to mitigate the distortion noises , when multiple antennas are available at sources and destinations ( see section v ) . as @xmath90 , we set @xmath91 , replace @xmath92 ( @xmath93 ) with @xmath94 , and let @xmath95 $ ] and @xmath96 = { \left [ { { \mathbf{t}}_{s,1}^t\left [ u \right ] , \cdots , { \mathbf{t}}_{s , k}^t\left [ u \right ] } \right]^t}$ ] . we consider a block - fading channel with coherence time @xmath97 ( symbol times ) , where @xmath98 are used for uplink training of each source / destination , and the remaining @xmath99 are used for data transmission . the upper bound on achievable rate is obtained by assuming perfect knowledge of @xmath100 , @xmath101 and @xmath102 can be provided with pilot signals , and meanwhile , the muis ( i.e. , the second terms of right - hand side of ( [ 2 - 6 ] ) and ( [ 2 - 7 ] ) ) and ei term @xmath103 $ ] can be somehow cancelled . this gives us the following upper bound on end - to - end achievable rate @xmath104 where @xmath105 and @xmath106 denote the achievable rates of @xmath107 and @xmath108 channels , respectively . according to ( [ 2 - 6 ] ) , ( [ 2 - 7 ] ) and the assumptions in the above , we have @xmath109 } \right\|}^2 } } \right ] } + 1 } } } \right ) \end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath110 is given as @xmath111 with @xmath112{\bf t}^h_s[u]\right]$ ] , @xmath113{\bf t}^h_r[u]\right]$ ] and @xmath114{\bf r}^h_s[u]\right]$ ] denoting the covariance matrices of distortion noises @xmath115 $ ] , @xmath116 $ ] and @xmath117 $ ] , respectively . _ 1 ) achievable rate of @xmath118 channel : _ since @xmath119 is only related with @xmath105 , it can be optimized separately to maximize @xmath105 . from ( [ 3 - 0 - 2 ] ) , the optimization problem is equivalent to the generalized rayleigh quotient problem , which can be solved as @xmath120 . the resultant upper bound on @xmath105 ( denoted by @xmath121 ) can be expressed as @xmath122 where @xmath123 is defined as @xmath124 and is independent of @xmath100 . the second step follows from the matrix inversion lemma @xcite . [ t1 ] assuming that the assumptions * a1 * and * a2 * hold . as @xmath125 , the achievable rate of @xmath118 channel in the large-@xmath30 regime is bounded as @xmath126 where @xmath127 , @xmath128 is determined by the following fixed - point algorithm with @xmath129 @xmath130 see appendix - b . the convergence of the fixed - point algorithm in theorem [ t1 ] has been proved in @xcite . _ 2 ) achievable rate of @xmath108 channel : _ from ( [ 3 - 0 - 2 ] ) , the achievable rates of @xmath118 and @xmath108 channels are coupled through @xmath113{\bf t}^h_r[u]\right]= { \rm diag}\left(\mathbb e\left[{\bf w}_t { \bf \lambda}_r{\bf w}_t^h\right]\right)$ ] , which makes the design of @xmath131 very challenging . however , with the following theorem we show that this coupling disappears in the large-@xmath30 regime , which allows a simple upper bound for achievable rate of @xmath108 channel . [ t2 ] assuming that the assumptions * a1 * and * a2 * hold . as @xmath125 , the achievable rate of @xmath118 channel is independent of @xmath131 . the achievable rate of @xmath108 channel in the large-@xmath30 regime is bounded as ( [ 3 - 3 - 1 ] ) , which is achieved by the eigen bf @xmath132 . see appendix - c . @xmath133 ' '' '' with theorems [ t1 ] and [ t2 ] , the upper bound of end - to - end achievable in the large-@xmath30 regime can be expressed as @xmath134 [ rm1 ] the bound in ( [ 3 - 4 ] ) is derived by assuming linear processing and fixed transmit powers at sources and relay , which is in general not capacity achieving . one exception is when @xmath135 and @xmath31 . from theorem [ t2 ] , the design of receive and transmit bf matrices is decoupled as @xmath31 . moreover , the distortion noises are assumed to be circularly symmetric complex gaussian distributed and independent of the desired signal . thus , based on the results in @xcite , linear processing along with power control is sufficient to achieve the capacity . when @xmath135 , the terms @xmath136 and @xmath137 in ( [ 3 - 3 ] ) vanish . by neglecting the low order term ( in @xmath32 ) , the bound in ( [ 3 - 4 ] ) reduces to @xmath138 , which is independent of @xmath76 and @xmath139 . thus , ( [ 3 - 4 ] ) is the upper bound for capacity of @xmath140 channel as @xmath135 and @xmath31 . different from remark [ rm1 ] , we consider the general case in which @xmath20 can be either fixed or scales with @xmath32 . with theorem [ t1 ] and theorem [ t2 ] , the effect of hardware impairments is still hard to analysis since @xmath141 is not in closed - form . to make the analysis tractable , we assume @xmath142 @xmath143 . using eigenvalue decomposition @xmath144 on @xmath145 in ( [ 3 - 3 ] ) , we have @xmath146 by examining ( [ 3 - 5 ] ) and the expression of @xmath147 in ( [ 3 - 3 ] ) , @xmath148 is an @xmath149 term . note that this is valid for arbitrary @xmath150 . thus , we can conclude that @xmath151 . replacing @xmath152 in @xmath153 with the symbol @xmath149 and substituting the result into ( [ 3 - 2 ] ) , @xmath105 can be written as ( [ 3 - 6 ] ) . @xmath154 ' '' '' for convenience , we further assume @xmath155 . note that this assumption does not effect the basis conclusions of the analysis . by neglecting the low order terms ( in @xmath32 ) in ( [ 3 - 6 ] ) and ( [ 3 - 3 - 1 ] ) , the upper bound on end - to - end achievable rate reduces to @xmath156 one can make several observations from ( [ 3 - 7 ] ) : \1 ) as @xmath157 , the effect of hardware impairments at the relay and ei disappears in the large-@xmath30 regime and the upper bound converges to that in remark [ rm1 ] . the end - to - end achievable rate is limited by distortion noises caused by hardware impairments at sources and destinations . the explanation is that the transmit distortion can be viewed as an interference signal the same channel as data of @xmath22 from ( [ 2 - 5 ] ) . thus , it can not be suppressed after combining by @xmath119 . the power of distortion due to receive imperfection of @xmath23 is proportional to that of desired receive signal ( after eigen bf ) and also can not be reduced by the transmit bf scheme of relay . thus , there is a finite ceiling on end - to - end achievable rate as @xmath31 . in fact , this poses a major limitation on mm - fdr with single antenna sources and destinations , which degrades the gain of massive array of relay greatly . \2 ) as @xmath20 scales with @xmath32 , the effect of hardware impairments at the relay and ei is not negligible . since the ei channel is typically stronger than desired channels , the @xmath107 channel becomes the bottleneck of end - to - end achievable rate . this indicates that it is of great importance to suppress ei to avoid the bottleneck effect . in this section , we consider a general model where sources and destinations are equipped with an arbitrary number of antennas . we first present a low complexity hardware impairments aware transceiver scheme ( referred to as hia scheme ) . then the achievable rate of mm - fdr with proposed hia scheme ( hia - mm - fdr ) is analyzed in the large-@xmath30 regime and the effect of hardware impairments is discussed . the optimal transceiver scheme for mm - fdr to optimize achievable rate is hard to find since the transmissions of @xmath158 and @xmath159 channels are deeply coupled due to the presence of ei and distortion noises . even without ei and distortion noises , the problem has been proved np - hard @xcite . as @xmath102 is an @xmath160 matrix , the learning of @xmath102 requires training sequence with length no less than @xmath32 . this task is prohibitive as the duration of channel coherent time is limited . thus , we assume that passive ei cancellation @xcite has been used and instantaneous ei channel is not available . a low complexity hia scheme is proposed to mitigate ei ( after passive cancellation ) and distortion noises . as will be shown in simulations , the hia scheme along with passive ei cancellation provides satisfactory gain compared to hdr . _ 1 ) transceiver design at the relay : _ as the variance of ei channel is typically stronger than desired channels , it is of great importance to control the ei power . from section iv - b , ei suppression is also important in reducing distortion noise due to hardware impairments of relay . we consider a two - stage bf scheme at the relay . the receive and transmit bf matrices are expressed as @xmath161 and @xmath162 . _ outer bf matrices : _ the outer bf matrices @xmath163 ( @xmath164 ) and @xmath165 ( @xmath166 ) are designed to suppress ei . @xmath167 and @xmath168 are design parameters . due to the lack of @xmath102 , @xmath169 and @xmath170 are allowed to depend only on the statistical knowledge of ei channels . with ( [ 2 - 6 ] ) , we design an average ei power minimization problem , i.e. , @xmath171 \end{aligned}\ ] ] in ( [ 4 - 1 ] ) , the design of @xmath169 and @xmath170 is coupled with the inner bf matrix , which makes closed - form solution inaccessible . thus , it is of great interest to find new target function to decouple the problem . for such , using cauchy - schwarz inequality twice , an upper bound on average ei power can be obtained as @xmath172 then the problem ( [ 4 - 1 ] ) can be rewritten approximately as @xmath173 \\ & \bigg . + { { \nu _ r}\sum\limits_{l = 1}^k { { e_{r , k } } } \mathbb e\left [ { { \text{tr}}\left ( { { \mathbf{p}}_r^h{{\mathbf{h}}_{ei}}{\mathbf{h}}_{ei}^h{{\mathbf{p}}_r } } \right ) } \right ] } \bigg\ } \\ & = { \text{arg}}\mathop { { { \min}}}\limits_{{{\mathbf{p}}_r},{{\mathbf{p}}_t } } \left\ { { \text{tr}}\left ( { { { \mathbf{\underline{w}}}_t}{\lambda _ r}{\mathbf{\underline{w}}}_t^h } \right){\text{tr}}\left ( { { \mathbf{p}}_t^h{{{\mathbf{\tilde c}}}_{ei}}{{\mathbf{p}}_t } } \right)\right . \\ & \bigg . \times{\text{tr}}\left ( { { \mathbf{p}}_r^h{{\mathbf{c}}_{ei}}{{\mathbf{p}}_r } } \right)+ { \nu _ r}{n_t}\sum\limits_{l = 1}^k { { e_{r , k } } } { \text{tr}}\left ( { { \mathbf{p}}_r^h{{\mathbf{c}}_{ei}}{{\mathbf{p}}_r } } \right ) \bigg\ } \end{aligned}\ ] ] the multiplicative term @xmath174 has been removed since it has no effect on the optimal solution . the second step follows from a similar derivation of ( [ a3 ] ) . from ( [ 4 - 3 ] ) , the columns of @xmath175 ( @xmath176 ) are composed of the eigenvectors corresponding to the @xmath167 ( @xmath168 ) smallest eigenvalues of @xmath177 ( @xmath178 ) , i.e. , @xmath179 \\ & { \bf \dot{p}}_t = \left [ { { { \mathbf{u}}_{{n_t } - { a_t } + 1}}\left ( { { { { \mathbf{\tilde c}}}_{ei } } } \right),{{\mathbf{u}}_{{n_t } - { a_t } + 2}}\left ( { { { { \mathbf{\tilde c}}}_{ei } } } \right ) , \cdots , { { \mathbf{u}}_{{n_t}}}\left ( { { { { \mathbf{\tilde c}}}_{ei } } } \right ) } \right ] \end{aligned}\ ] ] in ( [ 4 - 3 - 1 ] ) , @xmath167 and @xmath168 can be viewed as parameters to balance the allowable ei power and available degree of freedom ( dof ) for data transmission , which should be optimized with respect to specific metric . this will be considered in section vi . _ inner bf matrix : _ the inner bf matrices @xmath180 and @xmath181 are designed to realize the multi - user communication . @xmath182 and @xmath183 can be designed with different criteria , e.g. , maximizing the desired signal power which corresponding to the eigen bf , or minimizing the mui which corresponding to the zero - forcing ( zf ) scheme @xcite . we adopt the latter one since the zf scheme is known to approach the asymptotic limit ( in @xmath32 ) of achievable rate faster as the number of relay antennas increases @xcite . for given bf vectors at sources and destinations , define effective channel vectors of @xmath107 and @xmath108 channels as @xmath184 and @xmath185 , and let @xmath186 $ ] and @xmath187 $ ] , the inner bf matrices can be written as @xmath188 where @xmath189 is a diagonal normalized matrix with @xmath190_{l , l}={{\mathbf{e}}_l^h{{\left ( { { \mathbf{\underline{h}}}_{rd}^h{{\mathbf{\underline{h}}}_{rd } } } \right)}^ { - 1}}{{\mathbf{e}}_l}}$ ] . in practice , @xmath191 and @xmath192 should be estimated in order to compute ( [ 4 - 4 ] ) . this will be considered in section v - b . note that ( [ 4 - 4 ] ) requires @xmath193 so that @xmath167 and @xmath168 can be selected to ensure the invertibility of @xmath194 and @xmath195 . _ 2 ) transceiver design at the sources and destinations : _ similar to @xcite , we assume no instantaneous knowledge of channels at sources and destinations . this is reasonable since the amount of feedback could be very huge and unaffordable in mm - fdr . however , it is assumed that the local statistical knowledge of channels ( i.e. , @xmath196 for @xmath22 and @xmath197 for @xmath23 ) can be obtained . as observed from ( [ 3 - 7 ] ) , when @xmath125 , the achievable rates of @xmath118 channel and @xmath108 channel are limited by the transmit distortion noise at @xmath22 and receive distortion noise at @xmath23 . this motivates us to design @xmath75 and @xmath87 to suppress these negative factors with the antenna arrays of @xmath22 and @xmath23 . _ design of @xmath75 : _ intuitively , according to ( [ 2 - 5 ] ) we can design the following problem @xmath198}}{{\mathbb e\left [ { { \rm{tr}}\left ( { { \bf{h}}_{sr , k}{\bf{\theta } } _ { s , k}^\textsf{t}{{\bf{h}}_{sr , k}^h } } \right ) } \right]}}\\ & = \arg \mathop { \max}\limits_{\|{{\bf{p}}_{s , k}}\|=1 } \frac{{{\bf{p}}_{s , k}^h{{{\bf{\tilde c}}}_{sr , k}}{{\bf{p}}_{s , k}}}}{{{\nu _ { s , k}}{\rm{tr}}\left ( { { { { \bf{\tilde c}}}_{sr , k}}{\rm{diag}}\left ( { { \bf{p}}_{s , k}^h{{\bf{p}}_{s , k } } } \right ) } \right ) } } \\ & = \arg \mathop { \max}\limits_{\|{{\bf{p}}_{s , k}}\|=1 } \frac{1}{{{\nu _ { s , k}}}}{\bf{p}}_{s , k}^h{{{\bf{\tilde c}}}_{sr , k}}{{\bf{p}}_{s , k } } \end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath199 is the covariance matrix of @xmath200 , i.e. , @xmath201{\bf t}^h_{s , k}[u]]= \nu_{s , k}{\rm diag}\left({\bf p}_{s , k } { \bf p}^h_{s , k}\right)$ ] . the second step follows from a similar derivation with that in ( [ a3 ] ) and the last step is based on assumption * a2*. from ( [ 2 - 5 ] ) , the right - hand side of ( [ 4 - 5 - 0 ] ) can be interpreted as the average signal to transmit distortion noise ratio at @xmath22 . the solution of problem ( [ 4 - 5 - 0 ] ) is @xmath202 _ design of @xmath87 : _ similarly , based on ( [ 2 - 5 ] ) , the received bf vector at @xmath23 can be derived by solving the problem @xmath203}}{{{\mu _ { d , k}}{\mathbf{p}}_{d , k}^h{\text{diag}}\left ( { \mathbb{e}\left [ { { \mathbf{h}}_{rd , k}^h{{\mathbf{h}}_{rd , k } } } \right ] } \right){{\mathbf{p}}_{d , k}}}}$ ] , which results in @xmath204 during a training phase , each source / destination transmits pilot sequence sequentially which allows the relay to compute the estimates of channels . with hia scheme , it is sufficient to estimate the effective channel vectors @xmath205 and @xmath206 . this allows a reduced dimension estimation scheme . for brevity , we consider the estimation of @xmath205 . let @xmath207 and @xmath208 denote the pilot sequence and power of each pilot symbol . @xmath209 is multiplied by @xmath210 and transmitted by @xmath22 . the received pilot matrix at the relay is expressed as @xmath211 where @xmath212 denotes the transmit distortion noise of @xmath22 , whose @xmath13th column has distribution ( based on model ( [ 2 - 3 ] ) ) @xmath213 . @xmath214 denotes receive distortion noise at the relay . with model ( [ 2 - 4 ] ) , the @xmath13th column of @xmath215 has distribution @xmath216 ) } ) $ ] . @xmath217 is the awgn matrix , whose elements are i.i.d and distributed as @xmath42 . by multiplying both side of ( [ 4 - 5 ] ) with @xmath218 , we have @xmath219 from ( [ 4 - 6 ] ) , as a merit of hia scheme , the total length of pilot sequences to obtain the estimates of all effective channels can be as less as @xmath220 ( when @xmath98 is set to 1 ) . [ t3 ] the lmmes estimator of effective channel @xmath205 can be expressed as @xmath221 where @xmath222 is the covariance matrix of @xmath205 , which can be expressed as @xmath223 . @xmath224 is given by @xmath225 and @xmath226 the real effective channel @xmath227 can be decomposed as @xmath228 with @xmath229 denoting the estimation error . @xmath230 and @xmath231 are uncorrelated whose covariance matrices can be expressed as @xmath232 and @xmath233 , respectively . a sketch of the proof is presented in appendix - d . different from that with ideal hardware @xcite , the lmmse estimator is not equivalent to mmse estimator , since the received pilot signal is corrupted by the term @xmath234 ( due to transmit imperfection of @xmath22 ) , which is not independent with the channel to be estimated . there might exist non - linear estimator that results in smaller mse . however , the difference should be small since the distortion noises are relatively weak . the lmmse estimator of @xmath206 can be obtained using the same approach . for further analysis , we define @xmath235 and @xmath236 as the covariance matrix and lmmse estimates of @xmath206 , respectively . moreover , we define @xmath237 as the covariance matrix of @xmath236 , where @xmath238 is given by @xmath239 this subsection analyzes the achievable rate of hia - mm - fdr . the achievable rate expressions are derived based on the bounding technique in @xcite . _ 1 ) achievable rate of @xmath240 channel : _ by treating @xmath241}s_k[u]$ ] as the desired signal at @xmath242 channel , and approximating the remaining terms in ( [ 2 - 6 ] ) , i.e. , @xmath243 \!-\!\sqrt{e_{s , k}}{\mathbb e [ { { \bf{w}}_{r , k}^h{{\bf{h}}_{sr , k}}{{\bf{{\dot{p}}}}_{s , k } } } ] } s_k[u]$ ] , using the worst - case uncorrelated additive gaussian noise with the same variance , the rate in ( [ 4 - 11 ] ) is achievable on @xmath244 channel , where @xmath245 , @xmath246 , @xmath247 and @xmath248 denote the ei , mui , effective distortion due to transmit imperfection of sources and effective distortion due to receive imperfection of relay respectively , which are given by @xmath249 } \right|}^2}}}{{{e_{s , k}}{\rm{var}}\left ( { { \bf{w}}_{r , k}^h{{\bf{h}}_{sr , k}}{{\bf{{\dot{p}}}}_{s , k } } } \right){+ } \mathbb e\left [ { { { \textsf{ei}}}{{{}}_k } } \right ] + \mathbb e\left [ { { \rm{\textsf{mui}}}{{{}}_{r , k } } } \right ] + \mathbb e\left [ { { { \textsf{d}}}_{r , k}^{{\textsf{t } } } } \right ] + \mathbb e\left [ { { { \textsf{d}}}_{r , k}^{{\textsf{r } } } } \right ] + \mathbb e\left [ { { { \left\| { { \bf{w}}_{r , k } } \right\|}^2 } } \right ] } } } \right)\ ] ] ' '' '' @xmath250{\mathbf{t}}_r^h\left [ u \right ] } \right ] } \right){\bf{h}}_{ei}^h{{\bf{w}}_{r , k } } \\ { { \textsf{mui}}_{r , k } } = \sum\limits_{j = 1,j \ne k}^k { { e_{s , j}}{{\left| { { \bf{w}}_{r , k}^h{{\bf{h}}_{sr , j}}{{\bf{{\dot{p}}}}_{s , j } } } \right|}^2 } } \\ \textsf{d}_{r , k}^\textsf{t } = \sum\limits_{j = 1}^k { { \bf{w}}_{r , k}^h{{\bf{h}}_{sr , j } } \mathbb e\left [ { { { \bf{t}}_{s , j}}[u]{\bf{t}}_{s , j}^h[u ] } \right]{\bf{h}}_{sr , j}^h{{\bf{w}}_{r , k } } } \\ \textsf{d}_{r , k}^\textsf{r } = { \bf{w}}_{r , k}^h \mathbb e\left [ { { { \mathbf{r}}_r}\left [ u \right]{\mathbf{r}}_r^h\left [ u \right ] } \right]{{\bf{w}}_{r , k } } \end{array}\ ] ] wherein , the bf matrices at the relay are given by @xmath251 where @xmath252 $ ] ( @xmath93 ) and @xmath253 is a diagonal normalized matrix with @xmath254_{l , l}={{\mathbf{e}}_l^h{{\left ( { { \mathbf{\underline{\hat{h}}}}_{rd}^h{{\mathbf{\underline{\hat{h}}}}_{rd } } } \right)}^ { - 1}}{{\mathbf{e}}_l}}$ ] . note that we have replaced the effective channels in inner bf matrices with their estimates obtained in theorem [ t3 ] . [ t4 ] assume that the assumptions * a1 * and * a2 * hold , and @xmath167 is selected so that @xmath255 . with hia scheme , the achievable rate of @xmath118 channel in the large-@xmath30 regime is given by @xmath256 , where the powers of desired signal and awgn are @xmath257 } \right|}^2 } } } = e_{s , k}$ ] and @xmath258}= { ( { { \rm{tr } } ( { { { { \bf{\hat { \underline{c}}}}}_{sr , k } } } ) } ) ^ { - 1 } } $ ] , and @xmath259 = \frac{{\beta _ { ei}}{\rm{tr}}\left ( { { { { \bf{\tilde c}}}_{ei}}{{\bf \omega } _ r } } \right){\rm{tr}}\left ( { { { { \bf{\hat { \underline{c}}}}}_{sr , k}}{\bf{{\dot{p}}}}_r^h{{\bf{c}}_{ei}}{{\bf{{\dot{p}}}}_r } } \right)}{\left ( { { \rm{tr}}\left ( { { { { \bf{\hat { \underline{c}}}}}_{sr , k } } } \right ) } \right)^2 } \\ & \mathbb e[{{\textsf{mui}}_{r , k } } ] = \sum_{j = 1,j \ne k}^k \frac{{e_{s , j}}{\rm{tr}}\left ( { \left ( { { { \bf{\underline{c}}}_{sr , j } } - { { { \bf{\hat { \underline{c}}}}}_{sr , j } } } \right){{{\bf{\hat { \underline{c}}}}}_{sr , k } } } \right)}{\left ( { { \rm{tr}}\left ( { { { { \bf{\hat { \underline{c}}}}}_{sr , k } } } \right ) } \right)^ { 2}}\\ & \mathbb e[\textsf{d}_{r , k}^\textsf{t } ] = \frac{{\nu _ { s , k}}{e_{s , k } } g_{kk } + \sum\limits_{j = 1,j \ne k}^k { { \nu _ { s , j}}{e_{s , j } } g_{kj } { { } } } } { \left ( { { \rm{tr}}\left ( { { { { \bf{\hat { \underline{c}}}}}_{sr , k } } } \right ) } \right)^ { 2}}\\ & \mathbb e \left[\textsf{d}_{r , k}^\textsf{r } \right ] = \frac{\mu _ r } { { { \rm{tr}}\left ( { { { { \bf{\hat { \underline{c}}}}}_{sr , k } } } \right ) } } \\ & \times { { \sum\limits_{j = 1}^k { { e_{s , j}}{\beta _ { sr , j}}{\rm{tr}}\left ( { { { { \bf{\tilde c}}}_{sr , j}}{{\bf{\omega } } _ { s , j } } } \right ) } + { \beta _ { ei}}{\rm{tr}}\left ( { { { { \bf{\tilde c}}}_{ei}}{{\bf{\omega } } _ r } } \right ) + 1 } } \end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath260 is defined as @xmath261 $ ] and is given by lemma [ lm1 ] in appendix - a . @xmath262 and @xmath263 are given by ( [ d10 ] ) and ( [ d12 ] ) in the appendix - e . @xmath264 and @xmath265 are expressed as @xmath266 the scaling behaviors of above factors are shown in table [ tab1 ] . see appendix - e . [ cols= " < , < , < " , ] several important results on the effect of ei , mui and hardware impairments on achievable rate of @xmath118 channel can be obtained from theorem [ t4 ] and table [ tab1 ] . _ effect of ei : _ with the proposed hia scheme , the scaling behavior of ei is high correlated with @xmath267 and @xmath268 . with the assumption * a1 * , we have @xmath269 and @xmath270 . in fact , under specific spatial correlation model ( e.g. , the physical channel model with a fixed number of angular bins @xcite ) , it is possible to make @xmath271 and @xmath272 by selecting proper @xmath167 and @xmath168 . in this case , the power of ei can decrease faster than @xmath273 in the large-@xmath30 regime . note that this is in contrast with the result in @xcite , which shown that the power of ei decreases exactly with @xmath273 . _ effect of mui : _ the scaling behavior of mui confirms well with the classic result in mm - fdr with perfect hardware @xcite , i.e. , the mui diminishes as @xmath274 if @xmath275 . _ effect of transmit imperfection of sources : _ ( i ) when @xmath25 is fixed , an interesting observation is that the term @xmath276 , which is widely convinced @xmath277 terms with perfect hardware , scales as @xmath278 . as a result , the achievable rate of @xmath118 channel is limited by the joint effect of @xmath276 and the effective distortion due to the transmit imperfection of sources , i.e. , @xmath247 . in fact , the variation of scaling behavior of @xmath276 can also be viewed as a `` negative effect '' of transmit imperfection of sources . to see this , inserting the expression of @xmath260 ( given by lemma [ lm1 ] in appendix - a ) into ( [ 4 - 13 ] ) and letting @xmath274 , we can obtain @xmath279 , which demonstrates that @xmath280 scales as @xmath281 as long as @xmath282 . ( ii ) when @xmath25 scales with @xmath28 and @xmath283 , it is seen that the proposed hia scheme reduces the effect of transmit imperfection at sources by a factor of @xmath284 . the reason is that the transmit distortion is pre - suppressed by the transmit bf vector @xmath285 . _ effect of receive imperfection of the relay : _ by comparing the result in table [ tab1 ] and @xmath286 , it is seen that the hia scheme does not change the scaling behavior of distortion noise caused by receive imperfection of the relay . however , the receive distortion noise power is still reduced , since ei ( which is a main contributor of receive distortion noise ) is suppressed . _ 2 ) achievable rate of @xmath108 channel : _ according to ( [ 2 - 7 ] ) and the bounding technique in @xcite , the achievable rate of @xmath287 channel can be expressed as @xmath288 } \right|}^2}}}{{{e_{r , k}}{\mathop{\rm var } } \left ( { { \bf{{\dot{p}}}}_{d , k}^h{\bf{h}}_{rd , k}^h{{\bf{w}}_{t , k } } } \right ) + \mathbb e\left [ { { \textsf{mui}}_{d , k } } \right ] + \mathbb e\left [ { \textsf{d}_{d , k}^\textsf{t } } \right ] + \textsf{d}_{d , k}^\textsf{r}}+1 } } \right)\end{array } \end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath289 , @xmath290 and @xmath291 denote the mui , effective distortion due to transmit imperfection of relay and effective distortion due to receive imperfection of destinations , respectively , which are given by @xmath292 [ t5 ] assume that assumptions * a1 * and * a2 * hold , and @xmath168 is selected so that @xmath293 . with hia scheme , the achievable rate of @xmath108 channel in the large-@xmath30 regime is given by @xmath294 , where the power of desired signal is @xmath295 } \right|^2 } = { e_{r , k } } { { { \rm{tr } } ( { { \bf{\hat { \underline{c}}}}_{rd , k}^ { } } ) } } $ ] , and @xmath296 = \sum\limits_{j = 1,j \ne k}^k \frac{{e_{r , j}}{\rm{tr}}\left ( { \left ( { { { \bf{\underline{c}}}_{rd , k } } - { { { \bf{\hat { \underline{c}}}}}_{rd , k } } } \right){{{\bf{\hat { \underline{c}}}}}_{rd , j } } } \right ) } { { { { \rm{tr}}\left ( { { \bf{\hat { \underline{c}}}}_{rd , j}^ { } } \right ) } } } \\ & \mathbb e\left [ \textsf{d}_{d , k}^\textsf{t } \right ] = { \nu _ r}\sum\limits_{l = 1}^k \frac{{e_{r , l}}{\rm{tr}}\left ( { { { \bf{c}}_{rd , k}}{\rm{diag}}\left ( { { { \bf{{\dot{p}}}}_t}{{{\bf{\hat { \underline{c}}}}}_{rd , l}}{\bf{{\dot{p}}}}_t^h } \right ) } \right)}{\left({\lambda _ 1}\left ( { { { { \bf{\tilde c}}}_{rd , k } } } \right)\right)^{-1 } { { { \rm{tr}}\left ( { { { { \bf{\hat { \underline{c}}}}}_{rd , l } } } \right ) } } } \\ & \textsf{d}_{d , k}^\textsf{r } = \frac{{{\mu _ { d , k}}{e_{r , k}}}}{{{\text{tr}}\left ( { { { { \mathbf{\hat { \underline{c}}}}}_{rd , k } } } \right)}}\left ( { \frac{{{\mathbf{{\dot{p}}}}_{d , k}^h{\text{diag}}\left ( { { { \mathbf{{\dot{p}}}}_{d , k}}{\mathbf{{\dot{p}}}}_{d , k}^h } \right){{\mathbf{{\dot{p}}}}_{d , k}}}}{{{{\left ( { { \text{tr}}\left ( { { { { \mathbf{\hat { \underline{c}}}}}_{rd , k } } } \right ) } \right)}^ { - 2 } } } } } \right . \\ & + \frac { \frac{{{\mu _ r}}}{\tau } \left ( { \frac{1}{{{e_t } } } { + \frac{1}{{{\mu _ r}{e_t}}}}+ { \beta _ { rd , k}}\left ( { { \lambda _ 1}\left ( { { { { \mathbf{\tilde c}}}_{rd , k } } } \right ) + { \nu _ { d , k } } } \right ) } \right ) } { \left({{\text{tr}}\left ( { { \mathbf{\underline{c}}}_{rd , k}^3{\mathbf{\gamma } } _ { rd , k}^2 } \right)}\right)^{-1}{{\lambda _ 1}\left ( { { { { \mathbf{\tilde c}}}_{rd , k } } } \right ) } } \\ & \left . { + \sum\limits_{j = 1,j \ne k}^k { \frac{{{e_{r , j}}{\beta _ { rd , j}}}}{{{e_{r , k}}}}{\text{tr}}\left ( { { { \mathbf{c}}_{rd , k}}{{\mathbf{{\dot{p}}}}_t}{{{\mathbf{\hat { \underline{c}}}}}_{rd , j}}{\mathbf{{\dot{p}}}}_t^h } \right ) } + \frac{{{\text{tr}}\left ( { { { { \mathbf{\hat { \underline{c}}}}}_{rd , k } } } \right)}}{{{e_{r , k } } } } } \right ) \end{aligned}\ ] ] @xmath297 is defined as @xmath298 $ ] and is given by lemma [ lm1 ] in appendix - a . the scaling behaviors of above factors are shown in table [ tab2 ] . the proof is similar with that for theorem [ t4 ] , and thus it is neglected . from theorem [ t5 ] and table [ tab2 ] , one can observe a strong similarity between the effects of hardware impairments on @xmath287 channel and that on @xmath118 channel . in particular , the effective distortion due to the transmit imperfection of relay @xmath290 is suppressed by the large transmit array of the relay , and it diminishes as @xmath299 and @xmath300 . moreover , when @xmath26 is fixed , the achievable rate of @xmath287 channel is limited by the term @xmath301 and distortion noise caused by receive imperfection of @xmath23 . however , as @xmath26 scales with @xmath29 and @xmath300 , these factors are suppressed by @xmath302 . this is because that applying @xmath303 can be viewed as a post - suppression on receive distortion noise . with hia scheme , the following end - to - end rate for @xmath304 channel is achievable in the large-@xmath30 regime @xmath305 different from that for upper bound in the last section , @xmath306 can not be expressed in a simple form like ( [ 3 - 7 ] ) . however , based on table [ tab1 ] and table [ tab2 ] , one can simply deduce that @xmath307 will converge to a finite ceiling if @xmath25 and @xmath26 are fixed . however , with hia scheme , the end - to - end achievable rate grows without bound as @xmath308 if @xmath25 and @xmath26 scale with @xmath309 and @xmath310 . this is the same to the situation with ideal hardware @xcite . based on the achievable rate expressions , we discuss the hardware design of sources , destinations and relay in this subsection . although the achievable rate expressions hold for arbitrary @xmath311 , we will restrict our analysis to @xmath157 . this is a fundamental condition to ensure the benefit of massive mimo , i.e. , the mui is suppressed by a large surplus of degrees of freedom @xcite . in mm - fdr with hardware impairments , it is also essential to control the number of s - d pairs ( by , e.g. , some user scheduling scheme ) to suppress the ei and distortions . as @xmath25 and @xmath26 are fixed and small ( due to e.g. , size limitation ) , from theorem [ t4 ] and [ t5 ] , it is of great importance to reduce @xmath312 , @xmath313 and @xmath314 in order to alleviate the `` ceiling effect '' on achievable rate . this indicates that it is beneficial to use high - quality hardware at sources and destinations in this case . note that , different from the relay side , the use of high - quality hardware at sources and destinations is affordable , since the increased cost scales with @xmath25 and @xmath26 , instead of @xmath32 . when @xmath25 and @xmath26 scale with @xmath32 , from theorem [ t4 ] and [ t5 ] , the distortion noise powers due to hardware impairments at sources and destinations are lower order terms when compared with desired signal powers . this means that the sources and destinations can decrease the hardware quality to some extent without degrading the performance . later an example will be given to show how to achieve this . similar to that for sources and destinations when @xmath25 and @xmath26 scale with @xmath32 , the distortion noises caused by hardware impairments at the relay are lower order terms when compared with desired signal powers , which makes it possible to decrease the hardware quality without hurting the performance greatly . _ example : _ to get a clear insight , we consider the achievable rate of @xmath315 channel given by theorem [ t4 ] . we assume that there is only one s - d pair and let @xmath316 . when @xmath25 scales with @xmath28 , the achievable rate of @xmath107 channel reduces to @xmath317 where @xmath318 and @xmath319 are positive constants independent of @xmath320 , @xmath321 and @xmath322 . in ( [ 4 - 19 ] ) , we have replaced @xmath25 with the product of @xmath28 and some constant . assume we wish to achieve rate @xmath323 . according to ( [ 4 - 19 ] ) , we have ( as @xmath324 ) @xmath325 @xmath326 . the result is encouraging since it implies that we can increase @xmath327 and @xmath328 linearly as @xmath28 increase ( with @xmath25 scaling with @xmath28 ) without degrading the achievable rate . as a result , inexpensive mm - fdr is possible . in this section , we propose a low - complexity jdpo algorithm to maximize the se ( defined as the sum of all destinations achievable rates ) of hia - mm - fdr , subject to the maximum power constrains . the achievable rate expressions obtained in section v - c are utilized in the proposed algorithm . the algorithm needs only statistical knowledge of channels . therefore , it can be computed offline at a central node ( e.g. , relay ) and then broadcasts to the other nodes . let @xmath329 and @xmath330 be the maximum transmit power constraints at @xmath22 and relay , respectively , the se optimization problem can be formulated as follows @xmath331 where @xmath332 and @xmath333 . according to theorem 4 and theorem 5 , we rewrite @xmath334 and @xmath335 as @xmath336 and @xmath337 , where @xmath338 and @xmath339 denote the effective received sinrs of @xmath107 and @xmath108 channels respectively , which can be expressed as @xmath340 where @xmath341 @xmath342 with the above results and the formula @xmath343 @xmath344 ( @xmath345 is defined as @xmath346 ) , ( [ 5 - 2 ] ) can be rewritten as @xmath347 by using some algebra manipulations on the inequality constraints , @xmath348 , @xmath349 can be rewritten as @xmath350 problem ( [ 5 - 4 ] ) is a combinatorial optimization problem which is in general np hard . to solve ( [ 5 - 4 ] ) , we propose a jdpo algorithm to find suboptimal solution . our strategy is as follows . first , using the similar approach as that in @xcite , we show that the power control problem with fixed @xmath167 and @xmath168 can be approximated as a geometric programming ( gp ) and solved efficiently using the convex optimization tools @xcite . then we present a heuristic approach based on sequential optimization to solve @xmath167 and @xmath168 . _ power control with fixed @xmath167 and @xmath168 : _ from ( [ 5 - 4 ] ) and ( [ 5 - 5 ] ) , the inequality constraints are posynomial functions @xcite . as shown in @xcite , for any @xmath351 , @xmath352 can be approximated using a monomial function @xmath353 near a point @xmath354 , where @xmath355 and @xmath356 . by using this , the target function of ( [ 5 - 4 ] ) can be approximated as a monomial function , i.e. , @xmath357 . as a result , the solution for power control problem ( with fixed @xmath167 and @xmath168 ) can be obtained by solving several gps . the algorithm is summarized in algorithm [ alg1 ] . . * compute @xmath358 and @xmath359 . * solve the following gp problem + l _ e_s,1 , , e_s , k;e_r,1 , , e_r , k ; _ k = 1^k _ k^ - 1_k^ - _ k s.t . c_1 ~c_5 if @xmath360 or @xmath361 , stop . otherwise , set @xmath362 and go back to step 2 . [ alg1 ] _ optimization of @xmath167 and @xmath168 : _ an obvious approach to obtain @xmath167 and @xmath168 is via 2-d search . however , the complexity is very high since the power control problem described in the above should be computed for each @xmath363 . in this work , we present a heuristic approach to find suboptimal solution . in this approach , @xmath167 ( @xmath168 ) is searched over a subset @xmath364 ( @xmath365 ) , whose elements are sampled from @xmath366 ( @xmath367 ) . for example , @xmath364 can be selected as @xmath368 . the motivation of this idea is that the target function does not change dramatically as @xmath167 and @xmath168 increase / decrease by a small step as observed from the numerical results . moreover , instead of 2-d search , @xmath366 and @xmath367 are optimized sequentially over the sampled subsets @xmath364 and @xmath365 via 1-d search . the process repeats several times ( much less than @xmath369 ) to improve the solution . a summary of the jdpo algorithm is presented in algorithm [ alg2 ] . the algorithm converges to a local optimum since the target function is improved in each iteration . the complexity of algorithm [ alg2 ] is upper bounded as @xmath370 , where @xmath371 is the complexity to solve gp when @xmath372 and @xmath373 . usually , gp is solved using inner point method with polynomial time . the exact expression of @xmath371 is quite difficult and related with the structure of the problem . some insights on @xmath371 can be found in [ 37 , sec . 11.5 ] . * initialization : * set an initial @xmath168 , i.e. , @xmath374 , and a maximum repeat times @xmath375 . select the subsets @xmath364 and @xmath365 . . update @xmath376 . [ alg2 ] [ rm2 ] _ ( jdpo for ee optimization ) _ instead of the se optimization , we can also formulate an ee ( defined as the se divided by total transmit power @xcite ) optimization problem subject to a target se @xmath377 @xmath378 using ( [ 5 - 3 ] ) , the above problem is equivalent to @xmath379 @xmath380 and @xmath381 . with the technique in @xcite , the equality constraint can be converted to a monomial , and the power control problem ( with fixed @xmath167 and @xmath168 ) becomes a gp . thus , ( [ 5 - 6 ] ) can be solving by using a similar jdpo algorithm as that in algorithm [ alg2 ] . this section presents the simulation results to verify the analyses in the previous sections . throughout this section , we set @xmath382 , @xmath383 , @xmath384 for convenience . the correlation matrices of desired channels are generated with the exponential correlation model @xcite @xmath385_{l , j } } = \left\ { { \begin{array}{*{20}{l } } { r_{i , k}^{j - l},l \le j}\\ { { { \left ( { r_{i , k}^{l - j } } \right)}^*},l > j } \end{array } } \right.,i \in \left\ { { sr , rd } \right\}\ ] ] the model approximates the property of ula , where the correlation between adjacent antennas is @xmath386 $ ] and the phase of @xmath387 describes the angle of arrival / departure as seen from the array . @xcite shows how to map some of the parameters of ula to this model . the correlation matrices of ei channel @xmath388 and @xmath389 are generated similarly with a parameter @xmath390 . for convenience , we let @xmath391 , @xmath392 . the phases of @xmath387 and @xmath390 are uniformly selected from @xmath393 $ ] . we assume that 25@xmath39435db ei cancellation can be provided by passive ei suppression techniques ( more than 40db cancellation has been reported by using such techniques for infrastructure node @xcite ) . the variances of ei channel ( after passive cancellation ) and desired channels are selected as @xmath395$]db . with the path loss model in @xcite , the above range corresponds to the setup with the distances from sources / destinations to relay varying from 250 m to 500 m and 10 m segregation between relay transmit and receive arrays . this subsection considers the effect of hardware impairments on se of mm - fdr . the channel coherent time is set to @xmath396 and the length of pilot sequence is @xmath397 . , @xmath398 , @xmath399db , @xmath400db , @xmath401 , @xmath402 , @xmath403 , @xmath404 , @xmath405.,width=321 ] .,width=321 ] fig . [ fig1a ] shows the se of mm - fdr with single antenna at sources / destinations with different levels of hardware impairments . the ses based on transceiver scheme in section iv ( which achieves the upper bound when @xmath125 ) and hia scheme ( with @xmath406 ) are simulated . from fig . [ fig1a ] , the se is more sensitive to hardware impairments at sources and destinations . when @xmath407 , the se approaches to a finite ceiling quickly as the number of relay antennas increases . similar results can be observed when sources and destinations are equipped with multiple but fixed number of antennas in fig . [ fig1b ] . however , the result changes when @xmath25 and @xmath26 scale with @xmath32 and hia scheme is used . from fig . [ fig1b ] , as @xmath408 and @xmath409 , similar ses are achieved as sources / destinations or relay employ low - quality hardware , and no performance ceiling appears . this demonstrates the validness of hia scheme . at last , it is seen that the asymptotic results in theorem [ t1 ] & [ t2 ] and theorem [ t4 ] & [ t5 ] match well with exact results . , @xmath398 , @xmath410db , @xmath400db , @xmath411 , @xmath412db , @xmath402 , @xmath403 , @xmath404 , @xmath405 , @xmath408 , @xmath409.,width=321 ] as the performance is affected by impairments of both transmit and receive rf chains at the relay , we compare the effect of transmit and receive imperfections on se in fig . we assume that the sources and destinations use high - quality hardware ( @xmath413 ) . from the figure , the effect of receive imperfection is more detrimental . the reason is that , with ei at the relay , the power of distortion noise caused by receive imperfection is much stronger than that due to transmit imperfection . however , the performance difference decreases as @xmath28 increases from @xmath414 to @xmath415 , since the power of effective receive distortion scales as @xmath273 ( see table [ tab1 ] ) . this implies that use relatively higher - quality hardware or more antennas at the receive side of relay is beneficial . using a similar setup , one can obtain a parallel conclusion for destination , i.e. , the receive imperfection is more harmful than transmit imperfection . this is because that the transmit imperfection of destination only induces larger channel estimator errors , which is a part of the received signal at the destination . thus , based on model ( [ 2 - 4 ] ) , the distortion noise due to receive imperfection will be more detrimental . , where @xmath416 , @xmath417 , @xmath410db , @xmath400db , @xmath411 , @xmath412db , @xmath418 , @xmath419 , @xmath420 , @xmath421 , @xmath404 , @xmath405.,width=321 ] fig . [ fig4 ] shows the se as a function of the number of s - d pairs @xmath20 , where the length of pilot sequence of each source or destination is set to 1 . when @xmath396 , the figure reveals that the se will not increase without bound as @xmath20 increases since se is ultimately limited by the channel coherent time . in fact , as the number of s - d pair approaches to @xmath422 , the se converges to zero since all time is allocated to pilot phase . meanwhile , the se per s - d pair is a strictly decreasing function of @xmath20 . similar result can be observed as the channel coherent time is very long ( @xmath423 ) . this is because that the mui , ei and distortion noises become limiting factors when @xmath20 is large as seen from the scaling behaviors in table [ tab1 ] and table [ tab2 ] . this implies that the number of s - d pairs should be limited in order to ensure a se guarantee for each s - d pair , and this number decreases as the quality of hardware degrades . in this subsection , the se of hia - mm - fdr is compared with the massive mimo hdr ( mm - hdr ) @xcite and mm - fdr with zf - based transceiver ( zf - mm - fdr ) @xcite . the channel coherent time is set to @xmath396 and the length of pilot sequence is @xmath397 . the power of pilot symbol is @xmath400db . for hia - mm - fdr , the maximum power constraints at sources and relay are set to @xmath424db and @xmath425 . without jdpo , we set @xmath426 , @xmath427db . moreover , @xmath167 and @xmath168 are set to @xmath404 and @xmath428 . when jdpo is applied , @xmath76 , @xmath139 , @xmath167 and @xmath168 are determined by algorithm [ alg2 ] . the maximum repeat time @xmath375 of jdpo is set to 3 and the elements of subset @xmath429 are picked uniformly from @xmath430 with step @xmath431 . @xmath432 is obtained with the similar approach . the above parameters are chosen so that the performance loss due to the suboptimal search approach to obtain @xmath167 and @xmath168 is negligible . , @xmath411 , @xmath412db , @xmath408 , @xmath409 , @xmath418 , @xmath419.,width=321 ] fig . [ fig4 ] simulates the number of relay antennas required to achieve 3bit / s / hz se per s - d pair ( which ideally can support the 64-qam transmission with 1/2 channel code ) with different levels of hardware quality , where we set @xmath416 and @xmath417 . the figure reveals a tradeoff between the number of antennas and hardware quality , that is ( as discussed in section v - d ) , by increasing @xmath28 and @xmath29 , we can reduce @xmath433 and @xmath434 linearly without degrading the se . meanwhile , it is seen that the proposed hia - mm - fdr reduces the required number of relay antennas significantly when compared with zf - mm - fdr . moreover , the hia - mm - fdr outperforms the mm - hdr for large @xmath433 and @xmath434 . this is because that the distortion noises become the main limiting factor in this case when compared with ei . , @xmath408 , @xmath409 , @xmath411 , @xmath412db , @xmath418 , @xmath419 , @xmath435 , @xmath436.,width=321 ] the effect of asymmetric numbers of transmit and receive antennas at the relay is shown in fig . [ fig5 ] , where we set @xmath437 . it is shown that allocating more antennas to the receive side of relay is beneficial for hia - mm - fdr ( without jdpo ) and zf - mm - fdr . the reason is that , in the considered setup , the limiting factors of system performance are ei and distortion noise due to receive imperfection at the relay . from theorem [ t4 ] , these factors can be suppressed by receive antenna array of relay . however , when jdpo is applied , it is optimal to set @xmath438 . this is because that the jdpo algorithm in fact tries to balance the achievable rates of each hop by power control and adjusting @xmath167 and @xmath168 . this makes it unnecessary to allocate more antennas to receive side . , where @xmath398 , @xmath408 , @xmath409 , @xmath411 , @xmath418 , @xmath419 , @xmath435 , @xmath436.,width=321 ] fig . [ fig6 ] shows the se of hia - mm - fdr as a function of variance for ei channel @xmath439 . as expected , there exists a switching point between hia - mm - fdr and mm - hdr as @xmath439 increases . by increasing @xmath28 and @xmath29 , the constraint on @xmath439 for hia - mm - fdr to achieve a performance gain relaxes , which indicates that hia - mm - fdr becomes more attractive when the number of relay antennas is large . moreover , fig . [ fig6 ] demonstrates that the proposed jdpo algorithm can reduce the constraint on @xmath439 significantly . in particular , as @xmath440 , a se gain of 7.5bit / s / hz can be achieved by hia - mm - fdr when compared to mm - hdr as @xmath439 is @xmath441db . , @xmath442db , @xmath408 , @xmath409 , @xmath402 , @xmath403 , @xmath435 , @xmath436.,width=321 ] fig . [ fig7 ] considers the se - ee tradeoff of different schemes . the large - scale fading coefficients of channels are set to @xmath443 which is a realization generated with the model in @xcite . the ees of hia - mm - fdr and zf - mm - fdr are optimized by solving the problem in remark [ rm2 ] with jdpo algorithm and [ 12 , algorithm 1 ] , respectively . it is observed that hia - mm - fdr achieves better se - ee tradeoff when compared with zf - mm - fdr . the gain is mainly due to the optimization of @xmath167 and @xmath168 . this reason is that , if we fix @xmath372 and @xmath373 , the jdpo algorithm for ee optimization is similar to [ 12 , algorithm 1 ] . the only difference is that the power for each steam at the relay , i.e. , @xmath139 , is optimized in jdpo algorithm and [ 12 , algorithm 1 ] optimizes only the total power of relay . this paper considers the transceiver design of mm - fdr with hardware impairments . a low complexity hia scheme is proposed to mitigate the distortion noises by exploiting the statistical knowledge of channels and antenna arrays at sources and destinations . a joint degree of freedom and power optimization algorithm is presented to further optimize the se of hia - mm - fdr . the analytic results demonstrate that the proposed scheme can mitigate the ceiling effect " appears in traditional mm - fdr protocol , if the numbers of antennas at sources and destinations can scale with that at the relay . moreover , simulation results show that the hia - mm - fdr outperforms mm - fdr with traditional transceiver scheme . [ lm1 ] let @xmath444 and @xmath445 be the lmmse estimates of @xmath446 and @xmath447 , respectively . define @xmath448 $ ] and @xmath449 $ ] . in the large-(@xmath450 ) regime , we have @xmath451 the expression of @xmath452 can be obtained by replacing @xmath453 , @xmath454 , @xmath455 , @xmath312 and @xmath285 in ( [ x1 ] ) with @xmath456 , @xmath457 , @xmath458 , @xmath313 and @xmath303 , respectively . we show the proof for @xmath260 and the derivation for @xmath297 is similar . according to the uncorrlation between @xmath459 and @xmath460 , we have @xmath461 = \mathbb e [ { { { | { { \mathbf{{\underline{h}}}}_{sr , k}^h{{{\mathbf{\hat { \underline{h}}}}}_{sr , k } } } |}^2 } } ] - { ( { { \text{tr } } ( { { { { \mathbf{\hat { \underline{c}}}}}_{sr , k } } } ) } ) ^2}$ ] . with ( [ 4 - 7 ] ) and ( [ 4 - 8 ] ) , @xmath462 $ ] can be written as @xmath463 = \mathbb e\left [ { { { \left| { { \mathbf{{\underline{h}}}}_{sr , k}^h{{\mathbf{{\underline{c}}}}_{sr , k}}{{\mathbf{\gamma } } _ { sr , k}}{{\mathbf{{\underline{h}}}}_{sr , k } } } \right|}^2 } } \right ] \\ & + { \left ( { \frac{1}{{\tau { e_t } } } } \right)^2 } \mathbb e\left [ { { { \left| { { \mathbf{{\underline{h}}}}_{sr , k}^h{{\mathbf{{\underline{c}}}}_{sr , k}}{{\mathbf{\gamma } } _ { sr , k}}{\mathbf{{\dot{p}}}}_r^h{{\mathbf{h}}_{sr , k}}{\mathbf{t}}_{sr , k}^{}\phi _ { } ^ * } \right|}^2 } } \right ] \\ & + { \left ( { \frac{1}{{\tau { e_t } } } } \right)^2 } \mathbb e\left [ { { { \left| { { \mathbf{{\underline{h}}}}_{sr , k}^h{{\mathbf{{\underline{c}}}}_{sr , k}}{{\mathbf{\gamma } } _ { sr , k}}{\mathbf{{\dot{p}}}}_r^h{{\mathbf{r}}_{sr , k}}\phi _ { } ^ * } \right|}^2 } } \right ] \\ & + { \left ( { \frac{1}{{\tau { e_t } } } } \right)^2}\mathbb e\left [ { { { \left| { { \mathbf{{\underline{h}}}}_{sr , k}^h{{\mathbf{\underline{c}}}_{sr , k}}{{\mathbf{\gamma } } _ { sr , k}}{\mathbf{{\dot{p}}}}_r^h{{\mathbf{n}}_{sr , k}}\phi _ { } ^ * } \right|}^2 } } \right ] \\ \end{aligned}\ ] ] in the large-(@xmath450 ) regime , the result in [ 17 , lemma 4 ( iv ) ] shows that @xmath464 = { \left ( { { \text{tr}}\left ( { { { { \mathbf{\hat { \underline{c}}}}}_{sr , k } } } \right ) } \right)^2}$ ] . replacing @xmath465 with @xmath466 and using the following large @xmath28 approximation ( obtained based on [ 17 , lemma 4 ( ii ) ] ) @xmath467 it can be shown that @xmath468 \\ & = { \nu _ { s , k}}\tau e_t^2\frac{{{\bf{{\dot{p}}}}_{s , k}^h{\bf{\tilde c}}_{sr , k}^{}{\rm{diag}}\left ( { { \bf{{\dot{p}}}}_{s , k}^h{{\bf{{\dot{p}}}}_{s , k } } } \right){\bf{\tilde c}}_{sr , k}^{}{{\bf{{\dot{p}}}}_{s , k}}}}{{\left ( { { \rm{tr}}\left ( { { { { \bf{\hat { \underline{c}}}}}_{sr , k } } } \right ) } \right)^{-2}}{{{\left ( { { \lambda _ 1}\left ( { { { { \bf{\tilde c}}}_{sr , k } } } \right ) } \right)}^2 } } } \end{aligned}\ ] ] using the similar approach on the remaining terms in ( [ x3 ] ) , lemma [ lm1 ] is obtained . [ lm2 ] let @xmath469 and @xmath470 ( @xmath471 ) be the covariance matrices of effective channel @xmath472 and its estimates @xmath473 given by theorem [ t3 ] . if @xmath474 and @xmath475 , we have @xmath476 and @xmath477 . moreover , @xmath478 and @xmath479 ( i.e. , @xmath167 and @xmath168 scale with @xmath480 and @xmath481 , respectively ) . we present the proof for @xmath482 and @xmath167 . using definition of @xmath483 in theorem [ t3 ] and eigenvalue decomposition @xmath484 , we have @xmath485 where @xmath486 and @xmath487 are positive constants independent of @xmath167 . from ( [ x6 ] ) , @xmath488 is bounded as @xmath489 in ( [ x7 ] ) , the upper bound is an @xmath480 term . with the definition of @xmath222 in the theorem [ t3 ] , we have @xmath490 the last step is based on assumption * a1*. since @xmath491 , we can conclude that @xmath492 ( otherwise @xmath493 ) . thus , the lower bound in ( [ x7 ] ) also scales with @xmath480 . moreover , based on the definition of @xmath222 in the theorem [ t3 ] , we have @xmath494 where @xmath495 is the @xmath13th column of @xmath496 . from ( [ x9 ] ) , @xmath167 must scale @xmath480 . otherwise , @xmath497 based on assumption * a1*. to facilitate analysis , we first derive the covariance matrices of distortion noises @xmath115 $ ] and @xmath117 $ ] . based on the model ( [ 2 - 3 ] ) , we have @xmath498 . moreover , define @xmath499 = { \left [ { { \mathbf{x}}_{s,1}^t\left [ u \right ] , \cdots , { \mathbf{x}}_{s , k}^t\left [ u \right ] } \right]^t}$ ] , @xmath500 can be expressed based on model ( [ 2 - 4 ] ) as @xmath501 } \right ) \\ & + { \mu _ r}{\text{diag}}\left ( { \mathbb{e}\left [ { { { \mathbf{h}}_{ei}}{{\mathbf{\omega } } _ r}{\mathbf{h}}_{ei}^h } \right ] } \right ) + { \mu _ r}{{\mathbf{i}}_{{n_r } } } \end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath502 + { { \bf{t}}_s}\left [ u \right ] } \right){{\left ( { { \bf{s}}\left [ u \right ] + { { \bf{t}}_s}\left [ u \right ] } \right)}^h } } \right ] \\ \hspace{1.7em } = { \rm { diag}}\left ( { \left ( { 1 + { \nu _ { s,1 } } } \right){e_{s,1 } } , \cdots , \left ( { 1 + { \nu _ { s , k } } } \right){e_{s , k } } } \right)\\ { { \bf{\omega } } _ r } = \mathbb{e}\left [ { \left ( { { { \bf{x}}_r}\left [ u \right ] + { { \bf{t}}_r}\left [ u \right ] } \right){{\left ( { { { \bf{x}}_r}\left [ u \right ] + { { \bf{t}}_r}\left [ u \right ] } \right)}^h } } \right ] \\ \hspace{1.7em } = \mathbb{e}\left [ { { { \mathbf{x}}_r}\left [ u \right]{\mathbf{x}}_r^h\left [ u \right ] } \right ] + { \mathbf{\theta } } _ r^\textsf{t } \end{array}\ ] ] for further analysis , we approximate @xmath503{\mathbf{x}}_r^h\left [ u \right ] } \right]$ ] in ( [ a1 - 1 ] ) with @xmath504{\mathbf{x}}_r^h\left [ u \right ] } \right ] ) = \frac{1}{\nu_r } { \mathbf{\theta } } _ r^\textsf{t}$ ] . note that the approximation results in a new upper bound on @xmath121 ( the new bound will also be referred to as @xmath121 for convenience ) . straight - forward computations yield to @xmath505 & = \sum_{l = 1}^k { { \nu _ { s , l}}{e_{s , l}}\mathbb e\left [ { { { \mathbf{h}}_{sr , l}}{\mathbf{h}}_{sr , l}^h } \right ] } \\ & = \sum_{l = 1}^k { { ( 1+\nu _ { s , l})}{e_{s , l}}\beta_{sr , l}{{\mathbf{c}}_{sr , l } } } \end{aligned}\ ] ] following the spatial correlation model of @xmath506 in section iii and the approximation under ( [ a1 - 1 ] ) , the expression of @xmath507}$ ] can be obtained as in ( [ a3 ] ) , where the third step follows from the formula @xmath508 and the fourth step is due to the fact that the elements of @xmath509 are i.i.d with distribution @xmath42 . inserting ( [ a2 ] ) , ( [ a3 ] ) into ( [ a1 ] ) , the expression of @xmath500 in ( [ 3 - 3 ] ) is obtained . @xmath510 & \approx \left(1+\frac{1}{\nu_r}\right){\beta _ { ei } } \mathbb e\left [ { { \mathbf{c}}_{ei}^{1/2}{{\mathbf{x}}_{ei}}{\mathbf{\tilde c}}_{ei}^{1/2}{{\mathbf{\theta } } _ r^\textsf{t}}{\mathbf{\tilde c}}_{ei}^{1/2}{\mathbf{x}}_{ei}^h{\mathbf{c}}_{ei}^{1/2 } } \right ] \hfill \\ & = \left(1+\frac{1}{\nu_r}\right){\beta _ { ei}}\sum\limits_{l = 1}^{{n_t } } { \mathbb{e}\left [ { { \mathbf{c}}_{ei}^{1/2}{{\mathbf{x}}_{ei}}{\mathbf{\tilde c}}_{ei}^{1/2}{{\left ( { { \mathbf{\theta } } _ r^\textsf{t } } \right)}^{1/2}}{{\mathbf{e}}_l}{\mathbf{e}}_l^t{{\left ( { { \mathbf{\theta } } _ r^\textsf{t } } \right)}^{1/2}}{\mathbf{\tilde c}}_{ei}^{1/2}{\mathbf{x}}_{ei}^h{\mathbf{c}}_{ei}^{1/2 } } \right ] } \hfill \\ & = \left(1+\frac{1}{\nu_r}\right){\beta _ { ei}}\sum\limits_{l = 1}^{{n_t } } { \mathbb{e}\left [ { { { \left\| { { { \left ( { { \mathbf{\tilde c}}_{ei}^{1/2}{{\left ( { { \mathbf{\theta } } _ r^\textsf{t } } \right)}^{1/2}}{{\mathbf{e}}_l } } \right)}^t } \otimes { \mathbf{c}}_{ei}^{1/2}{\text{vec}}\left ( { { { \mathbf{x}}_{ei } } } \right ) } \right\|}^2 } } \right ] } \hfill \\ & = \left(1+\frac{1}{\nu_r}\right){\beta _ { ei}}\sum\limits_{l = 1}^{{n_t } } { { { \left\| { { { \left ( { { \mathbf{\tilde c}}_{ei}^{1/2}{{\left ( { { \mathbf{\theta } } _ r^\textsf{t } } \right)}^{1/2}}{{\mathbf{e}}_l } } \right)}^t } \otimes { \mathbf{c}}_{ei}^{1/2 } } \right\|}^2}}\hfill = \left(1+\frac{1}{\nu_r}\right){\beta _ { ei}}{\text{tr}}\left ( { { { { \mathbf{\tilde c}}}_{ei}}{\mathbf{\theta } } _ r^\textsf{t } } \right){\mathbf{c}}_{ei } \hfill \\ \end{aligned}\ ] ] then we derive the asymptotic bound in theorem [ t1 ] . by replacing @xmath511 in @xmath512 with @xmath513 , we approximate @xmath512 as @xmath514 the approximation results in a new upper bound on @xmath121 , since it reduces the power of residual ei after combining by @xmath119 ( the new bound will also be referred to as @xmath121 for convenience ) . based on [ 17 , lemma 4 ( ii ) ] , we can replace @xmath515 with its deterministic equivalence in the large-@xmath29 regime @xmath516 . finally , the expression of @xmath121 in theorem [ t1 ] can be obtained by first applying [ 17 , lemma 4 ( ii ) ] on @xmath517 , and then using [ 17 , theorem 1 ] . since the scenario of interest is the large-@xmath30 regime , we need only consider the effect of @xmath131 on @xmath518 ( given by theorem [ t1 ] ) , more precisely , the term @xmath519 . with the assumption * a2 * , we have @xmath520 . thus , using the model ( [ 2 - 3 ] ) , we have @xmath521}{\mathbf{x}}_r^h[u ] } \right ] } \right ) } \right ) = { \nu _ r}\sum_{l=1}^k e_{r , l}$ ] , which is independent of @xmath131 . then we derive the upper bound in theorem [ t2 ] . using the model ( [ 2 - 4 ] ) , the power of received distortion at the relay can be derived as @xmath522 } \right\|}^2 } } \right ] = { \mu _ { d , k}}\left ( { { n_t}{\beta _ { rd , k}}{e_{r , k } } + { \nu _ r}{n_t}{\beta _ { rd , k}}\sum_{l = 1}^k { { e_{r , l } } } + 1 } \right)$ ] . moreover , in the large @xmath29 regime , the term @xmath523 in ( [ 3 - 0 - 2 ] ) approaches to @xmath524 [ 17 , lemma 4 ( ii ) ] . therefore , it is sufficient to design @xmath131 to maximize the numerator of ( [ 3 - 0 - 2 ] ) , which is exactly the eigen bf scheme . the resultant upper bound on achievable rate can be obtained by applying [ 17 , lemma 4 ( ii ) ] and assumption * a2 * on the numerator of ( [ 3 - 0 - 2 ] ) . with the expression of lmmse estimator @xcite , we have @xmath525 { ( { \mathbb{e } [ { { { { \bf{\tilde { z}}}}_{sr , k}}{\bf { \tilde{z}}}_{sr , k}^h } ] } ) ^ { - 1}}{{{\bf { \tilde{z}}}}_{sr , k}}$ ] . using the independence between @xmath526 and distortion noises , we have @xmath527 & = \mathbb e\left [ { { \bf{{\dot{p}}}}_r^h{{\bf{h}}_{sr , k}}{{\bf{{\dot{p}}}}_{s , k}}{\bf{{\dot{p}}}}_{s , k}^h{\bf{h}}_{sr , k}^h{{\bf{{\dot{p}}}}_r } } \right]\\ & = { \beta _ { sr , k}}{\lambda _ 1}\left ( { { { { \bf{\tilde c}}}_{sr , k } } } \right){\bf{{\dot{p}}}}_r^h{{\bf{c}}_{sr , k}}{{\bf{{\dot{p}}}}_r } \\ & \buildrel \delta \over = { { \bf{\underline{c}}}_{sr , k } } \end{aligned}\ ] ] where the second step follows from a similar derivation with that in ( [ a3 ] ) . moreover , @xmath528}$ ] can be expressed as @xmath529= { { \bf{\underline{c}}}_{sr , k}}\\ & + { \left ( { \frac{1}{{\tau { e_t } } } } \right)^2}\mathbb{e}\left [ { { \mathbf{{\dot{p}}}}_r^h{{\mathbf{h}}_{sr , k}}{{\mathbf{t}}_{sr , k}}{\phi ^*}{\phi ^t}{\mathbf{t}}_{sr , k}^h{\mathbf{h}}_{sr , k}^h{{\mathbf{{\dot{p}}}}_r } } \right]\\ & + { \left ( { \frac{1}{{\tau { e_t } } } } \right)^2}\mathbb{e}\left [ { { \mathbf{{\dot{p}}}}_r^h{{\mathbf{r}}_{sr , k}}{\phi ^*}{\phi ^t}{\mathbf{r}}_{sr , k}^h{{\mathbf{{\dot{p}}}}_r } } \right ] \\ & + { \left ( { \frac{1}{{\tau { e_t } } } } \right)^2}\mathbb{e}\left [ { { \mathbf{{\dot{p}}}}_r^h{{\mathbf{n}}_{sr , k}}{\phi ^*}{\phi ^t}{\mathbf{n}}_{sr , k}^h{{\mathbf{{\dot{p}}}}_r } } \right ] \end{aligned}\ ] ] according to the independence between @xmath191 and @xmath530 , the second term of right - hand side of ( [ c2 ] ) can be rewritten as @xmath531 \\ & = { \nu _ { s , k}}\tau e_t^2\mathbb{e}\left [ { { \mathbf{{\dot{p}}}}_r^h{{\mathbf{h}}_{sr , k}}{\text{diag}}\left ( { { { \mathbf{{\dot{p}}}}_{s , k}}{\mathbf{{\dot{p}}}}_{s , k}^h } \right){\mathbf{h}}_{sr , k}^h{{\mathbf{{\dot{p}}}}_r } } \right]\\ & = { \nu _ { s , k}}\tau e_t^2 \beta_{sr , k } { \rm{tr}}\left ( { { { { \bf{\tilde c}}}_{sr , k}}{\rm{diag}}\left ( { { { \bf{{\dot{p}}}}_{s , k}}{\bf{{\dot{p}}}}_{s , k}^h } \right ) } \right){\bf{{\dot{p}}}}_r^h{{\bf{c}}_{sr , k}}{{\bf{{\dot{p}}}}_r } \end{aligned}\ ] ] using the similar approach on the remaining terms of ( [ c2 ] ) , and substituting the resultant expression of ( [ c2 ] ) and ( [ c1 ] ) into the expression of lmmse estimator , the result in theorem [ t3 ] is obtained . using ( [ 4 - 7])-([4 - 8 ] ) , the second order statistics of @xmath532 and @xmath229 in theorem [ t3 ] can be easily verified . note that @xmath535_{l , j } } = { \bf{\hat { \underline{h}}}}_{i , l}^h{{{\bf{\hat { \underline{h}}}}}_{i , j } } = { \mathbf{x}}_{i , l}^h{\mathbf{\hat { \underline{c}}}}_{i , l}^{1/2}{\mathbf{\hat { \underline{c}}}}_{i , j}^{1/2}{{\mathbf{x}}_{i , j}}$ ] ( @xmath471 ) . based on lemma [ lm2 ] , the dimensions of @xmath536 and @xmath537 ( i.e. , @xmath167 and @xmath168 ) approach to infinity as @xmath538 . thus , according to [ 17 , lemma 4 ( ii ) and ( iii ) ] , in the large-(@xmath450 ) regime , we can deduce @xmath539 _ ( a ) asymptotic expression : _ based on the model ( [ 2 - 3 ] ) , we have @xmath541{\mathbf{t}}_r^h\left [ u \right ] } \right ] } = { \nu _ r}{\rm{diag}}\left ( { \mathbb e\left [ { { { \bf{w}}_t}{\lambda _ r}{\bf{w}}_t^h } \right ] } \right)$ ] . since @xmath44 and @xmath542 are independent , @xmath245 can be rewritten as @xmath543 = \mathbb e [ { \bf{w}}_{r , k}^h{{\bf{h}}_{ei}}{{\bf{\omega } } _ r}{\bf{h}}_{ei}^h{{\bf{w}}_{r , k } } ] = \mathbb e [ { { { \| { { \bf{e}}_k^t { { ( { { \bf{\hat { \underline{h}}}}_{sr}^h{{{\bf{\hat { \underline{h}}}}}_{sr } } } ) } ^ { - 1}}{{{\bf{\hat { \underline{h}}}}}_{sr}}{{\bf{{\dot{p}}}}_r^h}{{\bf{h}}_{ei}}{\bf{\omega } } _ r^{1/2 } } \|^2 } } } ] $ ] , where @xmath544 is defined as @xmath545 + { { \bf{t}}_r}\left [ u \right ] } \right){{\left ( { { { \bf{x}}_r}\left [ u \right ] + { { \bf{t}}_r}\left [ u \right ] } \right)}^h } } ] = \mathbb e\left [ { { { \bf{w}}_t}{\lambda _ r}{\bf{w}}_t^h } \right ] + { \nu _ r}{\rm{diag}}\left ( { \mathbb e\left [ { { { \bf{w}}_t}{\lambda _ r}{\bf{w}}_t^h } \right ] } \right)$ ] . inserting ( [ 4 - 12 - 1 ] ) into the expression of @xmath544 and using ( [ d1 ] ) , we can obtain @xmath546 in the large-@xmath30 regime , using ( [ d1 ] ) , we have @xmath547 & = \frac{\mathbb e\left [ { { { { \bf{\hat { \underline{h}}}}}_{sr , k}}{{\bf{{\dot{p}}}}_r^h}{{\bf{h}}_{ei}}{{\bf{\omega } } _ r}{\bf{h}}_{ei}^h{{\bf{{\dot{p}}}}_r}{\bf{\hat { \underline{h}}}}_{sr , k}^h } \right]}{\left ( { { \rm{tr}}\left ( { { { { \bf{\hat { \underline{c}}}}}_{sr , k } } } \right ) } \right)^ { 2 } } \\ & = \frac{\mathbb e\left [ { { \rm{tr}}\left ( { { \bf{\hat { \underline{c}}}}_{sr , k}^{1/2}{{\bf{{\dot{p}}}}_r^h}{{\bf{h}}_{ei}}{{\bf{\omega } } _ r}{\bf{h}}_{ei}^h{{\bf{{\dot{p}}}}_r}{\bf{\hat { \underline{c}}}}_{sr , k}^{1/2 } } \right ) } \right]}{\left ( { { \rm{tr}}\left ( { { { { \bf{\hat { \underline{c}}}}}_{sr , k } } } \right ) } \right)^ { 2 } } \end{aligned}\ ] ] the second step is based on the property @xmath548 and independence between @xmath549 and @xmath44 . finally , using a similar derivation with ( [ a3 ] ) , @xmath543 $ ] in theorem [ t4 ] is obtained . _ ( b ) scaling behavior : _ substituting ( [ d6 ] ) into the expression of @xmath543 $ ] in theorem [ t4 ] and neglecting the terms that have no effect on the scaling behavior , we have @xmath550 = { \beta _ { ei}}{\left ( { { \text{tr}}\left ( { { { { \mathbf{\hat { \underline{c}}}}}_{sr , k } } } \right ) } \right)^ { - 2}}\sum\limits_{l = 1}^k { { e_{r , l}}{{\left ( { { \text{tr}}\left ( { { { { \mathbf{\hat { \underline{c}}}}}_{rd , l } } } \right ) } \right)}^ { - 1 } } } \\ \times { \text{tr}}\left ( { { { { \mathbf{\hat { \underline{c}}}}}_{rd , l}}{\mathbf{{\dot{p}}}}_t^h{{{\mathbf{\tilde c}}}_{ei}}{{\mathbf{{\dot{p}}}}_t } } \right){\text{tr}}\left ( { { { { \mathbf{\hat { \underline{c}}}}}_{sr , k}}{\mathbf{{\dot{p}}}}_r^h{{\mathbf{c}}_{ei}}{{\mathbf{{\dot{p}}}}_r } } \right ) \hfill \\ \le { \beta _ { ei}}\sum\limits_{l = 1}^k \frac{{{e_{r , l}}{\lambda _ { { n_r } - { a_r } + 1}}\left ( { { { \mathbf{c}}_{ei } } } \right ) } { \lambda _ { { n_t } - { a_t } + 1}}\left ( { { { { \mathbf{\tilde c}}}_{ei } } } \right ) } { { { \text{tr}}\left ( { { { { \mathbf{\hat { \underline{c}}}}}_{sr , k } } } \right ) } } \end{aligned}\ ] ] where the second step follows from the definition of @xmath496 and @xmath551 . based on lemma [ lm2 ] , @xmath552 . thus we can conclude that @xmath543 \le { \cal o}({\lambda _ { { n_r } - { a_r } + 1}}\left ( { { { \mathbf{c}}_{ei } } } \right ) { \lambda _ { { n_t } - { a_t } + 1 } } ( { { { { \mathbf{\tilde c}}}_{ei } } } ) kn_r^ { - 1})$ ] . _ ( a ) asymptotic expression : _ based on the model ( [ 2 - 3 ] ) , the covariance matrix of @xmath553 can be derived as @xmath554{\mathbf{t}}_{s , j}^h\left [ u \right ] } \right ] } = { \nu _ { s , j}}{e_{s , j}}{\rm{diag}}\left ( { { { \bf{{\dot{p}}}}_{s , j}}{\bf{{\dot{p}}}}_{s , j}^h } \right)$ ] . thus , in the large-@xmath30 regime , using ( [ d1 ] ) @xmath534 $ ] can be expressed as @xmath555 = { \left ( { { \rm{tr}}\left ( { { { { \bf{\hat { \underline{c}}}}}_{sr , k } } } \right ) } \right)^ { - 2}}{\nu _ { s , j}}{e_{s , k}}\\ & \times\underbrace { \mathbb e\left [ { { \bf{\hat { \underline{h}}}}_{sr , k}^h{\bf{{\dot{p}}}}_r^h{{\bf{h}}_{sr , k}}{\rm{diag}}\left ( { { { \bf{{\dot{p}}}}_{s , k}}{\bf{{\dot{p}}}}_{s , k}^h } \right){\bf{h}}_{sr , k}^h{{\bf{{\dot{p}}}}_r}{{{\bf{\hat { \underline{h}}}}}_{sr , k } } } \right]}_{{g_{kk } } } \\ & + { \left ( { { \rm{tr}}\left ( { { { { \bf{\hat { \underline{c}}}}}_{sr , k } } } \right ) } \right)^ { - 2}}\sum\limits_{j = 1,j \ne k}^k { \nu _ { s , j}}{e_{s , j } } \\ & \times\underbrace { \mathbb e\left [ { { \bf{\hat { \underline{h}}}}_{sr , k}^h{\bf{{\dot{p}}}}_r^h{{\bf{h}}_{sr , j}}{\rm{diag}}\left ( { { { \bf{{\dot{p}}}}_{s , j}}{\bf{{\dot{p}}}}_{s , j}^h } \right){\bf{h}}_{sr , j}^h{{\bf{{\dot{p}}}}_r}{{{\bf{\hat { \underline{h}}}}}_{sr , k } } } \right]}_{{g_{kj } } } \end{aligned}\ ] ] according to the independence between @xmath556 and @xmath557 when @xmath558 , @xmath559 can be derived as @xmath560 moreover , substituting ( [ 4 - 7 ] ) and ( [ 4 - 8 ] ) in theorem [ t3 ] into ( [ d9 ] ) and using the large-@xmath28 approximation in ( [ x5 ] ) , it is straightforward but tedious to show that @xmath262 can be derived as @xmath561 where @xmath562 . inserting ( [ d10 ] ) and ( [ d12 ] ) into ( [ d9 ] ) , the expression of @xmath534 $ ] is obtained . _ ( b ) scaling behavior : _ using the similar approach as that for @xmath540 $ ] , it can be shown that , as @xmath25 is fixed , the first and second terms on the right - hand side of ( [ d9 ] ) scale as @xmath149 and @xmath273 , respectively . thus , @xmath534 = { \cal o}(1)$ ] since @xmath563 . as @xmath25 scales with @xmath28 , it is shown in @xcite that the eigenvectors of @xmath564 form a unitary dft matrix in the large @xmath25 regime . in this case , we have @xmath565 . applying this property and lemma [ lm2 ] on ( [ d12 ] ) , it can be verified that the first term on the right - hand side of ( [ d9 ] ) scales as @xmath566 as @xmath25 scales with @xmath28 . this completes the proof . h. a. suraweera , i. krikidis , g. zheng , c. yuen and p. j. smith , `` low - complexity end - to - end performance optimization in mimo full - duplex relay systems , '' _ ieee trans . wireless commun . _ , vol . 13 , pp . 913 - 927 , feb . 2014 . c. y. a. shang , p. j. smith , g. k. woodward and h. a. suraweera , `` linear transceivers for full duplex mimo relays , '' in proc australian communications theory workshop ( ausctw 2014 ) , sydney , australia , feb . 2014 , pp . d. nguyen , l .- n . tran , p. pirinen , and m. latva - aho , `` precoding for full duplex multiuser mimo systems : spectral and energy efficiency maximization , '' _ ieee trans . signal process . 16 , pp . 4038 - 4050 , aug . 2013 . a. sabharwal , p. schniter , d. guo , d. w. bliss , s. rangarajan , and r. wichman , `` in - band full - duplex wireless : challenges and opportunities , '' _ ieee j. sel . areas commun . 1637 - 1652 , sep . 2014 . h. q. ngo , h. a. suraweera , m. matthaiou , and e. g. larsson , `` multipair full - duplex relaying with massive arrays and linear processing , '' _ ieee j. sel . areas commun . _ , 9 , pp . 1721 - 1737 , sep . 2014 . j. zhang , c. k. wen , s. jin , x. gao , k. wong , `` on capacity of large - scale mimo multiple access channels with distributed sets of correlated antennas '' _ ieee j. sel . areas commun . 133 - 148 , feb . 2013 . h. yin , d. gesbert , l. cottatellucci , `` dealing with interference in distributed large - scale mimo systems : a statistical approach , '' _ ieee j. sel . topics signal process . _ , vol . 8 , no . 942 - 953 , aug . 2014 . g. santella and f. mazzenga , `` a hybrid analytical - simulation procedure for performance evaluation in m - qam - ofdm schemes in presence of nonlinear distortions , '' _ ieee trans . 142 - 151 , feb . 1998 . h. suzuki , t. tran , i. b. collings , and et al , `` transmitter noise effect on the performance of a mimo - ofdm hardware implementation achieving improved coverage , '' _ ieee j. sel . areas commun . _ , vol . 26 , pp . 867 - 876 , aug . 2008 . j. w. silverstein and z. d. bai , `` on the empirical distribution of eigenvalues of a class of large dimensional random matrices , '' _ journal of multivariate analysis _ , 175 - 192 , 1995 . s. wagner , r. couillet , m. debbah , and d. t. m. slock , `` large system analysis of linear precoding in correlated miso broadcast channels under limited feedback , '' _ ieee trans . inf . theory _ 58 , no . 7 , pp . 4509 - 4537 , jul . 2012 . e. bj@xmath567rnson , p. zetterberg , m. bengtsson , and b. ottersten , `` capacity limits and multiplexing gains of mimo channels with transceiver impairments , '' _ ieee commun . 91 - 94 , 2013 . p. c. weeraddana , m. codreanu , m. latva - aho , and a. ephremides , `` resource allocation for cross - layer utility maximization in wireless networks , '' _ ieee trans . 2790 - 2809 , 2011 . e. bj@xmath567rnson , d. hammarwall , and b. ottersten , `` exploiting quantized channel norm feedback through conditional statistics in arbitrarily correlated mimo systems , '' _ ieee trans . signal process . 4027 - 4041 , 2009 . xiaochen xia received his b.e . degree in electronic science and technology from tianjin university ( tju ) in 2010 , and m.s . degree in communication and information system from pla university of science and technology ( plaust ) , in 2013 . he is currently working toward the ph.d . degree in institution of communications engineering , plaust . his research interests include relaying network , full - duplex communication , network coding , mimo techniques . he received the 2013 excellent master degree dissertation award of jiangsu province , china . dongmei zhang received the b.s . degree in institute of communications engineering , nanjing , china in 1994 , and the m.s . degree in communications and information system from the institute of communications engineering , nanjing , china in 1997 . she is currently an associate professor with the pla university of science and technology , nanjing , china . her research interests include broadband wireless communications , cognitive radio , wireless resource allocation . kui xu received the b.s . degree and ph.d . degree from the pla university of science and technology ( plaust ) , nanjing , china in 2004 and 2009 . he is currently a lecturer in the plaust . his research interests include broadband wireless communications , signal processing for communications and wireless communication networks . he is the author of about 50 papers in refereed journals and conference proceedings and holds 5 patents in china . xu currently served on the technical program committee of the ieee wcsp 2014 . he received the ursi young scientists award in 2014 and the 2010 ten excellent doctor degree dissertation award of plaust . wenfeng ma received the b.s . degree in microwave communication from the institute of communications engineering , nanjing , china in 1995 , and the m.s . degree in communications and information system from the institute of communications engineering , nanjing , china in 1998 , and the ph.d . degree in communications and information system from the pla university of science and technology , nanjing , china , in 2002 . he is currently an associate professor with the pla university of science and technology , nanjing , china . his research interests include wireless communication networks , broadband wireless communications . youyun xu was graduated from shanghai jiao tong university with ph.d . degree in information and communication engineering in 1999 . he is currently a professor with nanjing institute of communication engineering , china . he is also a part - time professor with the institute of wireless communication technology of shanghai jiao tong university ( sjtu ) , china . professor xu has more than 20 years professional experience of teaching and researching in communication theory and engineering . now , his research interests are focusing on new generation wireless mobile communication system ( imt - advanced and related ) , advanced channel coding and modulation techniques , multi - user information theory and radio resource management , wireless sensor networks , cognitive radio networks , etc . Abstract:

Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.

Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered . Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video . Paper: the production of heavy quarkonium at hadron colliders provides particular challenges and opportunity for insight into the theory of quantum chromodynamics ( qcd ) as its mechanisms of production operate at the boundary of the perturbative and non - perturbative regimes . despite being among the most studied of the bound - quark systems , there is still no clear understanding of the mechanisms in the production of quarkonium states like the @xmath0 that can consistently explain both the production cross - section and spin - alignment measurements in @xmath7 , heavy - ion and hadron - hadron collisions ( see review articles@xcite and references therein ) . data obtained by the large hadron collider ( lhc ) collaborations can help to test existing theoretical models of both quarkonium production and @xmath8-production in a new energy regime , at higher transverse momenta and in wider rapidity ranges than have previously been studied . furthermore , quarkonium production in proton - proton collisions plays a key role as a reference point to understand heavy ion collisions and to understand the interplay between production and suppression mechanisms in such collisions@xcite . this paper presents a measurement of the inclusive @xmath0 production cross - section and the production fraction @xmath9 of non - prompt @xmath0 ( produced via the decay of a @xmath1-hadron ) to inclusively - produced @xmath0 ( hereafter referred to as the _ non - prompt fraction _ ) : @xmath10{\textrm{inclusive } } j/\psi x^{\prime\prime})}\ ] ] in the decay channel @xmath11 as a function of both @xmath0 transverse momentum and rapidity in @xmath12 collisions at the lhc at a centre - of - mass energy of 7 tev and with an integrated luminosity of up to 2.3 pb@xmath3 . the fraction has the advantage that acceptances and many efficiencies are the same for the numerator and denominator , and so systematic effects are reduced . the results of these analyses are compared to those made by the cms collaboration @xcite with 314 nb@xmath13 of integrated luminosity and those from the cdf collaboration@xcite where appropriate . from these measurements , the prompt @xmath0 production cross - section ( @xmath14 , produced directly from the proton - proton collisions or from decays of heavier charmonium states like the @xmath15 or @xmath16 ) , and the non - prompt ( @xmath17 ) @xmath0 production cross - section , are extracted . these results are compared to corresponding predictions made by the colour evaporation model @xcite , fixed - order next - to - leading log ( fonll ) @xcite and colour singlet nnlo@xmath6 calculations @xcite . further details of the results of measurements presented here may be found in reference @xcite . in this section , the collection and processing of the data used in the paper are outlined . this involves a description of the most relevant subsystems of the atlas detector@xcite : the trigger system , the muon system and the inner tracking detector . also specified are the triggers used and the offline data processing , in particular the selection of candidate muons . the atlas detector covers almost the full solid angle around the collision point with layers of tracking detectors , calorimeters and muon chambers . for the measurements presented in this paper , the trigger system , the inner detector tracking devices ( i d ) and the muon spectrometer ( ms ) are of particular importance . the i d covers the pseudorapidity range @xmath18 2.5 . it consists of a silicon pixel detector , a silicon strip detector ( sct ) and a transition radiation tracker ( trt ) . these detectors are located at a radial distance from the beam axis between 50.5 mm and 1066 mm and are immersed in a 2 t solenoidal magnetic field . the i d barrel consists of 3 pixel layers , 4 layers of double - sided silicon strip modules and 73 layers of trt straws . the i d end - cap has @xmath19 pixel layers , @xmath20 layers of silicon strips and @xmath21 layers of trt straws . the ms is located inside a toroidal magnetic field which provides 2.5 tm of bending power in the barrel and 5 tm in the end - caps . it consists of four detectors using different technologies and is divided into a barrel region ( @xmath22 ) and two end - cap regions ( @xmath23 ) . precise muon measurements are made using monitored drift tube chambers ( mdt ) in both the barrel and end - cap sections and using cathode strip chambers ( csc ) in the end - caps ; fast triggers are obtained from resistive plate chambers ( rpc ) in the barrel and thin gap chambers ( tgc ) in the end - caps . the chambers are arranged in three layers , so high- particles leave at least three measurement points with a lever arm of several metres . the atlas detector has a three - level trigger system : level 1 ( l1 ) , level 2 ( l2 ) and the event filter ( ef ) . for the measurements presented here , the trigger relies on the minimum bias trigger scintillators ( mbts ) and the muon trigger chambers . the mbts are mounted in front of each liquid argon endcap calorimeter cryostat at @xmath24 m and are segmented into eight sectors in azimuth and two rings in pseudorapidity ( @xmath25 and @xmath26 ) . the mbts trigger is configured to require two hits above threshold from either side of the detector . a dedicated muon trigger at the ef level is required to confirm the candidate events chosen for these measurements . this is initiated by the mbts l1 trigger and searches for the presence of at least one track in the entire ms . this trigger is referred to as the ef minimum bias trigger ; it has an adjustable threshold on the reconstructed muon @xmath4 above which events are accepted and can be prescaled to accept a pre - determined fraction of events meeting the trigger condition . the l1 muon trigger is based on rpcs for the barrel and tgcs for the end - caps @xcite . it seeks hit coincidences within different rpc or tgc detector layers inside programmed geometrical windows which define the muon candidate @xmath4 , then selects candidates above six programmable thresholds and provides a rough estimate of their positions @xcite . for the earlier data used in this analysis , the muon trigger corresponds to the lowest threshold trigger which requires a simple two - layer time coincidence within a region of @xmath27.1 in @xmath28-@xmath29 . no further geometrical constraint is applied . as the instantaneous luminosity of the collider increases , the trigger requirement switches from the ef minimum bias trigger to the l1 muon trigger . later data periods make use of triggers seeded by this l1 trigger but with additional @xmath4 cuts applied at the ef stage ( these are referred to henceforth as the ef muon triggers ) . muon identification and reconstruction extends to @xmath30 , covering a range from 1 gev up to more than 1 tev . `` standalone ms tracks '' are constructed entirely based on the signal hits collected in the ms . the track parameters are obtained from the ms track and are extrapolated to the interaction point , taking into account multiple scattering and energy loss in the traversed material . in this analysis , two categories of reconstructed muons are then defined : * * muons from combined reconstruction : * the _ combined _ muon reconstruction relies on a statistical combination of both a standalone ms track and an i d track . due to i d coverage , the combined reconstruction covers @xmath31 . * * muons from i d track tagging : * a _ tagged _ muon is formed by ms track segments which are not formed into a complete ms track , but which are matched to i d tracks extrapolated to the ms . such a reconstructed muon adopts the measured parameters of the associated i d track . in this paper , the muon tagging is limited to @xmath32 , in order to ensure high quality tracking and a reduction of fake muon candidates . the muon track helix parameters are taken from the i d measurement alone , since the ms does not add much to the precision in the lower momentum range relevant for the @xmath0 measurements presented here . proton - proton collision data , at a centre - of - mass energy of 7 tev , are included in this analysis if taken during stable beam periods and when the ms , i d and magnet systems were collecting data of a sufficiently high quality to be suitable for physics analysis . monte carlo samples are used for determining acceptance corrections , as part of the trigger efficiency studies and in systematic cross - checks . they are generated using pythia 6 @xcite and tuned using the atlas mc09 tune@xcite which uses the mrst lo@xmath6 parton distribution functions @xcite . the passage of the generated particles through the detector is simulated with geant4 @xcite and the data are fully reconstructed with the same software that is used to process the data from the detector . for the signal @xmath0 monte carlo ( used to derive the kinematic acceptance corrections ) , the pythia implementation of prompt @xmath0 production sub - processes in the nrqcd colour octet mechanism framework @xcite is used . prompt @xmath0 production includes _ direct _ production from the hard interaction , as well as charmonium feed - down from excited states . these _ prompt _ production modes are distinct from _ non - prompt _ production that is characterised by the production of @xmath0 via the decay of a @xmath1-hadron . all samples are generated with polar and azimuthal isotropy in the decay of the @xmath0 ( the default in pythia ) and are reweighted at the particle level according to their respective angular dependencies in order to describe a number of different spin - alignment scenarios ( see section [ sec : acceptance ] ) . the @xmath0 spin - alignment is not measured in this analysis , so the reweighted mc samples are used to provide an uncertainty band on the measurement of the production cross - section , determined by the maximum variation in acceptance across the full allowed range of @xmath0 spin alignment . the analyses presented in this paper make use of the triggers described in section [ section : atlastrig ] . for the inclusive cross - section , in a given data taking period an event is retained or discarded based on the decision of a single specific trigger , without reference to any other triggers . for data from the initial running with lower instantaneous luminosity , the l1 muon trigger is used . during later periods , with higher instantaneous luminosity , a more selective ef muon trigger with a 4 gev threshold is required , and eventually , this is increased to a 6 gev threshold . the sample collected by these triggers and passing the data quality selections corresponds to an integrated luminosity of @xmath33 . for the measurement of the @xmath34 non - prompt fraction ( see equation [ eqn : fraction ] ) , two additional triggers are employed , and rather than using a single trigger to veto or accept events , several triggers are used simultaneously such that any one of them having fired results in the event being included . from the initial period , events triggering either the l1 muon trigger or the ef minimum bias trigger are used ( whereas only the l1 muon trigger is used for the cross section ) . for intermediate instantaneous luminosities the l1 muon trigger is used alone since the ef minimum bias trigger is highly prescaled at this stage . for the highest instantaneous luminosities , events are accepted which pass any of the ef muon triggers with thresholds of 4 , 6 or 10 gev . during the runs with the highest instantaneous luminosities , the triggers with @xmath35 and @xmath36 gev are prescaled ; however , the @xmath37 threshold trigger is not . the inclusion of this unprescaled trigger along with the addition of the ef minimum bias trigger for the @xmath34 non - prompt fraction measurement results in a slightly higher integrated luminosity of @xmath38 . to veto cosmic rays , events passing the trigger selection are required to have at least three tracks associated with the same reconstructed primary vertex . the three tracks must each have at least one hit in the pixel system and at least six hits in the sct . each remaining event is required to contain at least one pair of reconstructed muons . only muons associated with i d tracks that have at least one hit in the pixels and six in the sct are accepted . di - muon pairs with opposite charges are considered to be @xmath0 candidates if at least one combined muon is present in the pair . at least one reconstructed muon candidate is required to match a muon trigger ( that is , at least one muon from the @xmath0 candidate should have fired the trigger ) . for the early data , when the trigger is essentially based on the l1 muon trigger , at least one of the offline muons is required to match the trigger muon candidate to within @xmath39 at the ms plane ; for the later data taking , where the ef muon trigger is used , the offline and trigger muons are required to match within @xmath40 . the two i d tracks from each pair of muons passing these selections are fitted to a common vertex @xcite . no constraints are applied in the fit and a very loose vertex quality requirement , which retains over @xmath41 of the candidates , is used . for the @xmath34 non - prompt fraction analysis , where lifetime information is an important element of the fit , additional requirements are made on the @xmath11 candidates . the probability of the fit to the @xmath0 vertex is required to be greater than @xmath42 . for this measurement @xmath0 candidates are rejected if the two muon candidate tracks were used to build different primary vertices in the offline reconstruction ( so that there is an ambiguity as to which primary vertex to use in the lifetime calculation ) . this rejects fewer than @xmath43 of the @xmath0 candidates . this selection is not applied for the cross - section analysis . the measurement of the inclusive differential cross - section is determined as @xmath45 where @xmath46 is the @xmath0 yield in a given @xmath47 bin after continuum background subtraction and correction for detector efficiency , bin migration and acceptance effects , @xmath48 is the integrated luminosity of the data sample and @xmath49 and @xmath50 are the @xmath4 and rapidity bin widths . the probability @xmath51 that a @xmath52 decay is reconstructed depends on the kinematics of the decay , as well as the muon reconstruction and trigger efficiencies . in order to recover the true number @xmath46 of such decays produced in the collisions , a weight @xmath53 is applied to each observed @xmath0 candidate , defined as the inverse of that probability and calculated as follows : @xmath54 where @xmath55 is the kinematic acceptance , @xmath56 is a correction factor for bin migrations due to finite detector resolution , @xmath57 is the i d tracking efficiency and @xmath58 is the single - muon offline reconstruction efficiency . here @xmath59 and @xmath60 are the transverse momenta and pseudorapidities of the positive and negative muons from the @xmath0 decay . the trigger efficiency @xmath61 for a given @xmath0 candidate is calculated from single - muon trigger efficiencies @xmath62 as follows : @xmath63 the resultant weighted invariant mass peak is then fitted ( see section [ sec : mlfit ] ) to extract @xmath46 . the kinematic acceptance @xmath64 is the probability that the muons from a @xmath0 with transverse momentum @xmath4 and rapidity @xmath65 fall into the fiducial volume of the detector . this is calculated using generator - level monte carlo , applying cuts on the momenta and pseudorapidities of the muons to emulate the detector geometry . global cuts of @xmath66gev for @xmath67 are supplemented by finer @xmath4 thresholds in slices of @xmath28 to ensure that regions of the detector where the values of offline and trigger efficiencies are so low as to be compatible with zero within the uncertainties ( approximately 10% ) are excluded from the analysis . the acceptance also depends on the spin - alignment of the @xmath0 , which is not known for lhc conditions . the general angular distribution for the decay @xmath52 in the @xmath0 decay frame is given by : @xmath68 where @xmath69 is the angle between the direction of the positive muon momentum in the @xmath0 decay frame and the @xmath0 line of flight , while @xmath70 is defined as the angle between the @xmath0 production and decay planes in the lab frame ( see figure [ fig : coordinates ] , reference @xcite and references therein ) . spin - alignment angles , in the @xmath0 decay frame . @xmath69 is the angle between the direction of the positive muon in that frame and the direction of @xmath0 in the laboratory frame , which is directed along the @xmath71-axis . @xmath70 is the angle between the @xmath0 production ( @xmath72 ) plane and its decay plane formed by the direction of the @xmath0 and the lepton @xmath73 ( from @xcite ) . , scaledwidth=40.0% ] a large number of possible combinations of the coefficients @xmath74 have been studied , including some with @xmath75 . five extreme cases have been identified that lead to the biggest variation of acceptance within the kinematics of the atlas detector and define an envelope in which the results may vary under all possible polarisation assumptions : 1 . isotropic distribution , independent of @xmath69 and @xmath70 , with @xmath76 , labelled as flat " . this is used as the main ( central ) hypothesis . 2 . full longitudinal alignment with @xmath77 , labelled as long " . 3 . transverse alignment with @xmath78 , labelled as @xmath79 . 4 . transverse alignment with @xmath80 , labelled as @xmath81 . transverse alignment with @xmath82 , labelled as @xmath83 . two - dimensional acceptance maps are produced in bins of @xmath4 and @xmath65 of the @xmath0 , for each of these five scenarios , and are illustrated in figure [ fig : acc_2d ] . the maps are obtained by reweighting the flat distribution at the generator level using equation [ eqn : spinalign ] . the central value for the cross - section measurement is obtained using the flat distribution , and the measurement is repeated using the other scenarios to provide an envelope of maximum variation , which is stated as a separate uncertainty . the measured efficiency and acceptance corrected @xmath0 @xmath4 distribution is parameterised in each rapidity slice by a smooth analytic function smeared with a gaussian distribution , with resolution derived from the data . this function is integrated numerically over each analysis bin , both with and without smearing applied , and the ratio of the two integrals is assigned as the correction factor . the effects of this correction are minimal at low @xmath4 and at low rapidities ( around 0.1% ) but increase at higher @xmath4 and at higher rapidities ( reflecting the decreasing momentum resolution ) to a maximum of approximately 3% . the offline single muon reconstruction efficiencies are obtained from data using a tag and probe method @xcite , where muons are paired with i d tracks ( probes " ) of opposite charge . the pairs are divided into two categories : those in which the probe is reconstructed as a muon ( `` matched '' ) and those in which it is not ( `` unmatched '' ) . both sets of pairs are binned according to the @xmath4 and @xmath28 of the probe . in each of these bins , the muon reconstruction efficiency is obtained as the ratio of the number of @xmath0 candidates in the peak of the matched distribution to the total number of candidates in the two mass distributions . the efficiency is extracted as a parameter of a simultaneous fit to both distributions . the dependence of the offline reconstruction efficiency on the muon charge is well described by mc within the acceptance . this procedure is repeated separately for combined and tagged muons . at higher @xmath4 ( for muons with @xmath4 above 6 gev ) , the efficiency determination is supported by additional tag and probe @xmath84 data@xcite for improved precision in the efficiency plateau region . a hybrid monte carlo and data - derived ( tag and probe ) scheme is used to provide trigger efficiencies for the analysis with finer binning than would be possible with the available data statistics . this is necessary to avoid significant biases that would otherwise appear in the analysis with coarsely binned efficiencies across rapidly - changing efficiency regions . due to significant charge dependence at low @xmath4 and high pseudorapidity , separate trigger efficiency maps are produced for positive and negative muons . fully simulated samples of prompt @xmath85 decays are used to populate the @xmath0 @xmath47 plane , using a fine binning . for each bin , the probability of a muon activating the trigger is determined . the derived efficiencies are then reweighted to match the data efficiencies in the reconstructed bins in cases where discrepancies exist between the data and monte carlo , and uncertainties from data are assigned . muon reconstruction efficiencies have been determined relative to reconstructed i d tracks . inner detector tracks associated to muons and having the selection cuts used in this analysis have a reconstruction efficiency @xmath57 of @xmath86 per track ( with no significant pseudorapidity or @xmath4 dependence observed within the phase space probed with this analysis ) , which is applied as an additional correction to the @xmath0 candidate yields . the distribution of reconstructed @xmath0 candidates over the candidate @xmath87 plane is shown in figure [ fig : yieldmap ] . the majority of @xmath0 candidates are reconstructed in intermediate-@xmath4 , high-@xmath65 areas , as at lower @xmath4 values the acceptance of the detector is limited . candidates ( in the invariant mass interval @xmath88 gev ) as a function of @xmath0 @xmath4 and rapidity.,title="fig:",scaledwidth=55.0% ] + candidates ( in the invariant mass interval @xmath88 gev ) as a function of @xmath0 @xmath4 and rapidity.,title="fig:",scaledwidth=42.0%,scaledwidth=33.0% ] candidates ( in the invariant mass interval @xmath88 gev ) as a function of @xmath0 @xmath4 and rapidity.,title="fig:",scaledwidth=55.0% ] + the inclusive @xmath0 production cross - section is determined in four slices of @xmath0 rapidity : @xmath89 and @xmath90 . in figure [ fig : jpsimass ] , the invariant mass distributions for all oppositely charged muon pairs passing the selection for the differential cross - section measurement are shown , before acceptance and efficiency corrections , for the four rapidity slices . table [ tab : jpsimass ] presents the results of the combined signal and background fits . in these fits the @xmath0 and @xmath91(2s ) peaks are represented by gaussians , while the background is described by a quadratic polynomial . [ fig : jpsimass1 ] candidates used in the cross - section analysis , corresponding to an integrated luminosity of @xmath92 pb@xmath3 . the points are data , and the uncertainties indicated are statistical only . the solid lines are the result of the fit described in the text.,title="fig:",scaledwidth=45.0% ] [ fig : jpsimass2 ] candidates used in the cross - section analysis , corresponding to an integrated luminosity of @xmath92 pb@xmath3 . the points are data , and the uncertainties indicated are statistical only . the solid lines are the result of the fit described in the text.,title="fig:",scaledwidth=45.0% ] [ fig : jpsimass3 ] candidates used in the cross - section analysis , corresponding to an integrated luminosity of @xmath92 pb@xmath3 . the points are data , and the uncertainties indicated are statistical only . the solid lines are the result of the fit described in the text.,title="fig:",scaledwidth=45.0% ] [ fig : jpsimass4 ] candidates used in the cross - section analysis , corresponding to an integrated luminosity of @xmath92 pb@xmath3 . the points are data , and the uncertainties indicated are statistical only . the solid lines are the result of the fit described in the text.,title="fig:",scaledwidth=45.0% ] .fitted mass , resolution and yields of @xmath0 candidates reconstructed in four @xmath0 rapidity bins . all uncertainties quoted are statistical only . the shift in mass away from the world average in the highest rapidity bin reflects the few - per - mille uncertainty in the tracking @xmath4 scale at the extreme ends of the detector . [ cols=">,^,^,^,^ " , ] g. aad@xmath93 , b. abbott@xmath94 , j. abdallah@xmath95 , a.a . abdelalim@xmath96 , a. abdesselam@xmath97 , o. abdinov@xmath98 , b. abi@xmath99 , m. abolins@xmath100 , h. abramowicz@xmath101 , h. abreu@xmath102 , e. acerbi@xmath103 , b.s . acharya@xmath104 , d.l . adams@xmath105 , t.n . addy@xmath106 , j. adelman@xmath107 , m. aderholz@xmath108 , s. adomeit@xmath109 , p. adragna@xmath110 , t. adye@xmath111 , s. aefsky@xmath112 , j.a . aguilar - saavedra@xmath113@xmath114 , m. aharrouche@xmath115 , s.p . ahlen@xmath116 , f. ahles@xmath93 , a. ahmad@xmath117 , m. ahsan@xmath118 , g. aielli@xmath119 , t. akdogan@xmath120 , t.p.a . kesson@xmath121 , g. akimoto@xmath122 , a.v . akimov @xmath123 , a. akiyama@xmath124 , m.s . alam@xmath125 , m.a . alam@xmath126 , s. albrand@xmath127 , m. aleksa@xmath128 , i.n . aleksandrov@xmath129 , m. aleppo@xmath103 , f. alessandria@xmath130 , c. alexa@xmath131 , g. alexander@xmath101 , g. alexandre@xmath96 , t. alexopoulos@xmath132 , m. alhroob@xmath133 , m. aliev@xmath134 , g. alimonti@xmath130 , j. alison@xmath135 , m. aliyev@xmath98 , p.p . allport@xmath136 , s.e . allwood - spiers@xmath137 , j. almond@xmath138 , a. aloisio@xmath139 , r. alon@xmath140 , a. alonso@xmath121 , m.g . alviggi@xmath139 , k. amako@xmath141 , p. amaral@xmath128 , c. amelung@xmath112 , v.v . ammosov@xmath142 , a. amorim@xmath143@xmath144 , g. amors@xmath145 , n. amram@xmath101 , c. anastopoulos@xmath146 , t. andeen@xmath147 , c.f . anders@xmath133 , k.j . anderson@xmath148 , a. andreazza@xmath103 , v. andrei@xmath149 , m - l . andrieux@xmath127 , x.s . anduaga@xmath150 , a. angerami@xmath147 , f. anghinolfi@xmath128 , n. anjos@xmath143 , a. annovi@xmath151 , a. antonaki@xmath152 , m. antonelli@xmath151 , s. antonelli@xmath153 , a. antonov@xmath154 , j. antos@xmath155 , f. anulli@xmath156 , s. aoun@xmath157 , l. aperio bella@xmath158 , r. apolle@xmath97 , g. arabidze@xmath100 , i. aracena@xmath159 , y. arai@xmath141 , a.t.h . arce@xmath160 , j.p . archambault@xmath161 , s. arfaoui@xmath128@xmath162 , j - f . arguin@xmath163 , e. arik@xmath120@xmath164 , m. arik@xmath120 , a.j . armbruster@xmath165 , o. arnaez@xmath115 , c. arnault@xmath102 , a. artamonov@xmath166 , g. artoni@xmath167 , d. arutinov@xmath133 , s. asai@xmath122 , r. asfandiyarov@xmath168 , s. ask@xmath169 , b. sman@xmath170 , l. asquith@xmath171 , k. assamagan@xmath105 , a. astbury@xmath172 , a. astvatsatourov@xmath173 , g. atoian@xmath107 , b. aubert@xmath158 , b. auerbach@xmath107 , e. auge@xmath102 , k. augsten@xmath174 , m. aurousseau@xmath158 , n. austin@xmath136 , r. avramidou@xmath132 , d. axen@xmath175 , c. ay@xmath176 , g. azuelos@xmath177@xmath178 , y. azuma@xmath122 , m.a . baak@xmath128 , g. baccaglioni@xmath130 , c. bacci@xmath179 , a.m. bach@xmath163 , h. bachacou@xmath180 , k. bachas@xmath128 , g. bachy@xmath128 , m. backes@xmath96 , m. backhaus@xmath133 , e. badescu@xmath131 , p. bagnaia@xmath167 , s. bahinipati@xmath181 , y. bai@xmath182 , d.c . bailey@xmath183 , t. bain@xmath183 , j.t . baines@xmath111 , o.k . baker@xmath107 , m.d . baker@xmath105 , s. baker@xmath184 , f. baltasar dos santos pedrosa@xmath128 , e. banas@xmath185 , p. banerjee@xmath177 , sw . banerjee@xmath172 , d. banfi@xmath128 , a. bangert@xmath186 , v. bansal@xmath172 , h.s . bansil@xmath187 , l. barak@xmath140 , s.p . baranov@xmath123 , a. barashkou@xmath129 , a. barbaro galtieri@xmath163 , t. barber@xmath169 , e.l . barberio@xmath188 , d. barberis@xmath189 , m. barbero@xmath133 , d.y . bardin@xmath129 , t. barillari@xmath108 , m. barisonzi@xmath190 , t. barklow@xmath159 , n. barlow@xmath169 , b.m . barnett@xmath111 , r.m . barnett@xmath163 , a. baroncelli@xmath191 , a.j . barr@xmath97 , f. barreiro@xmath192 , j. barreiro guimares da costa@xmath193 , p. barrillon@xmath102 , r. bartoldus@xmath159 , a.e . barton@xmath194 , d. bartsch@xmath133 , v. bartsch@xmath195 , r.l . bates@xmath137 , l. batkova@xmath196 , j.r . batley@xmath169 , a. battaglia@xmath197 , m. battistin@xmath128 , g. battistoni@xmath130 , f. bauer@xmath180 , h.s . bawa@xmath159@xmath198 , b. beare@xmath183 , t. beau@xmath199 , p.h . beauchemin@xmath97 , r. beccherle@xmath200 , p. bechtle@xmath201 , h.p . beck@xmath197 , m. beckingham@xmath93 , k.h . becks@xmath190 , a.j . beddall@xmath202 , a. beddall@xmath202 , s. bedikian@xmath107 , v.a . bednyakov@xmath129 , c.p . bee@xmath157 , m. begel@xmath105 , s. behar harpaz@xmath203 , p.k . behera@xmath204 , m. beimforde@xmath108 , c. belanger - champagne@xmath205 , p.j . bell@xmath96 , w.h . bell@xmath96 , g. bella@xmath101 , l. bellagamba@xmath206 , f. bellina@xmath128 , g. bellomo@xmath103 , m. bellomo@xmath207 , a. belloni@xmath193 , o. beloborodova@xmath208 , k. belotskiy@xmath154 , o. beltramello@xmath128 , s. ben ami@xmath203 , o. benary@xmath101 , d. benchekroun@xmath209 , c. benchouk@xmath157 , m. bendel@xmath115 , b.h . benedict@xmath210 , n. benekos@xmath211 , y. benhammou@xmath101 , d.p . benjamin@xmath160 , m. benoit@xmath102 , j.r . bensinger@xmath112 , k. benslama@xmath212 , s. bentvelsen@xmath213 , d. berge@xmath128 , e. bergeaas kuutmann@xmath201 , n. berger@xmath158 , f. berghaus@xmath172 , e. berglund@xmath96 , j. beringer@xmath163 , k. bernardet@xmath157 , p. bernat@xmath184 , r. bernhard@xmath93 , c. bernius@xmath105 , t. berry@xmath126 , f. bertinelli@xmath128 , f. bertolucci@xmath214 , m.i . besana@xmath103 , n. besson@xmath180 , s. bethke@xmath108 , w. bhimji@xmath215 , r.m . bianchi@xmath128 , m. bianco@xmath216 , o. biebel@xmath109 , s.p . bieniek@xmath184 , j. biesiada@xmath163 , m. biglietti@xmath179 , h. bilokon@xmath151 , m. bindi@xmath153 , s. binet@xmath102 , a. bingul@xmath202 , c. bini@xmath167 , c. biscarat@xmath217 , u. bitenc@xmath93 , k.m . black@xmath116 , r.e . blair@xmath171 , j .- b . blanchard@xmath102 , g. blanchot@xmath128 , c. blocker@xmath112 , j. blocki@xmath185 , a. blondel@xmath96 , w. blum@xmath115 , u. blumenschein@xmath176 , g.j . bobbink@xmath213 , v.b . bobrovnikov@xmath208 , a. bocci@xmath160 , c.r . boddy@xmath97 , m. boehler@xmath201 , j. boek@xmath190 , n. boelaert@xmath218 , s. bser@xmath184 , j.a . bogaerts@xmath128 , a. bogdanchikov@xmath208 , a. bogouch@xmath219@xmath164 , c. bohm@xmath220 , v. boisvert@xmath126 , t. bold@xmath210@xmath221 , v. boldea@xmath131 , m. bona@xmath110 , v.g . bondarenko@xmath154 , m. boonekamp@xmath180 , g. boorman@xmath126 , c.n . booth@xmath146 , p. booth@xmath146 , s. bordoni@xmath199 , c. borer@xmath197 , a. borisov@xmath142 , g. borissov@xmath194 , i. borjanovic@xmath222 , s. borroni@xmath167 , k. bos@xmath213 , d. boscherini@xmath206 , m. bosman@xmath95 , h. boterenbrood@xmath213 , d. botterill@xmath111 , j. bouchami@xmath177 , j. boudreau@xmath223 , e.v . bouhova - thacker@xmath194 , c. boulahouache@xmath223 , c. bourdarios@xmath102 , n. bousson@xmath157 , a. boveia@xmath148 , j. boyd@xmath128 , i.r . boyko@xmath129 , n.i . bozhko@xmath142 , i. bozovic - jelisavcic@xmath224 , j. bracinik@xmath187 , a. braem@xmath128 , e. brambilla@xmath216 , p. branchini@xmath191 , g.w . brandenburg@xmath193 , a. brandt@xmath225 , g. brandt@xmath134 , o. brandt@xmath176 , u. bratzler@xmath226 , b. brau@xmath227 , j.e . brau@xmath228 , h.m . braun@xmath190 , b. brelier@xmath183 , j. bremer@xmath128 , r. brenner@xmath205 , s. bressler@xmath203 , d. breton@xmath102 , n.d . brett@xmath97 , p.g . bright - thomas@xmath187 , d. britton@xmath137 , f.m . brochu@xmath169 , i. brock@xmath133 , r. brock@xmath100 , t.j . brodbeck@xmath194 , e. brodet@xmath101 , f. broggi@xmath130 , c. bromberg@xmath100 , g. brooijmans@xmath147 , w.k . brooks@xmath229 , g. brown@xmath138 , e. brubaker@xmath148 , p.a . bruckman de renstrom@xmath185 , d. bruncko@xmath155 , r. bruneliere@xmath93 , s. brunet@xmath230 , a. bruni@xmath206 , g. bruni@xmath206 , m. bruschi@xmath206 , t. buanes@xmath231 , f. bucci@xmath96 , j. buchanan@xmath97 , n.j . buchanan@xmath181 , p. buchholz@xmath232 , r.m . buckingham@xmath97 , a.g . buckley@xmath215 , s.i . buda@xmath131 , i.a . budagov@xmath129 , b. budick@xmath233 , v. bscher@xmath115 , l. bugge@xmath234 , d. buira - clark@xmath97 , e.j . buis@xmath213 , o. bulekov@xmath154 , m. bunse@xmath235 , t. buran@xmath234 , h. burckhart@xmath128 , s. burdin@xmath136 , t. burgess@xmath231 , s. burke@xmath111 , e. busato@xmath236 , p. bussey@xmath137 , c.p . buszello@xmath205 , f. butin@xmath128 , b. butler@xmath159 , j.m . butler@xmath116 , c.m . buttar@xmath137 , j.m . butterworth@xmath184 , w. buttinger@xmath169 , t. byatt@xmath184 , s. cabrera urbn@xmath145 , m. caccia@xmath103 , d. caforio@xmath153 , o. cakir@xmath237 , p. calafiura@xmath163 , g. calderini@xmath199 , p. calfayan@xmath109 , r. calkins@xmath238 , l.p . caloba@xmath239 , r. caloi@xmath167 , d. calvet@xmath236 , s. calvet@xmath236 , r. camacho toro@xmath236 , a. camard@xmath199 , p. camarri@xmath119 , m. cambiaghi@xmath240 , d. cameron@xmath234 , j. cammin@xmath133 , s. campana@xmath128 , m. campanelli@xmath184 , v. canale@xmath139 , f. canelli@xmath148 , a. canepa@xmath241 , j. cantero@xmath192 , l. capasso@xmath139 , m.d.m . capeans garrido@xmath128 , i. caprini@xmath131 , m. caprini@xmath131 , d. capriotti@xmath108 , m. capua@xmath242 , r. caputo@xmath117 , c. caramarcu@xmath131 , r. cardarelli@xmath243 , t. carli@xmath128 , g. carlino@xmath244 , l. carminati@xmath103 , b. caron@xmath241 , s. caron@xmath93 , c. carpentieri@xmath93 , g.d . carrillo montoya@xmath168 , a.a . carter@xmath110 , j.r . carter@xmath169 , j. carvalho@xmath143@xmath245 , d. casadei@xmath233 , m.p . casado@xmath95 , m. cascella@xmath214 , c. caso@xmath189@xmath164 , a.m. castaneda hernandez@xmath168 , e. castaneda - miranda@xmath168 , v. castillo gimenez@xmath145 , n.f . castro@xmath143 , g. cataldi@xmath246 , f. cataneo@xmath128 , a. catinaccio@xmath128 , j.r . catmore@xmath194 , a. cattai@xmath128 , g. cattani@xmath119 , s. caughron@xmath100 , d. cauz@xmath247 , a. cavallari@xmath167 , p. cavalleri@xmath199 , d. cavalli@xmath130 , m. cavalli - sforza@xmath95 , v. cavasinni@xmath214 , a. cazzato@xmath216 , f. ceradini@xmath179 , a.s . cerqueira@xmath239 , a. cerri@xmath128 , l. cerrito@xmath110 , f. cerutti@xmath151 , s.a . cetin@xmath248 , f. cevenini@xmath139 , a. chafaq@xmath209 , d. chakraborty@xmath238 , k. chan@xmath181 , b. chapleau@xmath249 , j.d . chapman@xmath169 , j.w . chapman@xmath165 , e. chareyre@xmath199 , d.g . charlton@xmath187 , v. chavda@xmath138 , s. cheatham@xmath194 , s. chekanov@xmath171 , s.v . chekulaev@xmath241 , g.a . chelkov@xmath129 , m.a . chelstowska@xmath250 , c. chen@xmath251 , h. chen@xmath105 , l. chen@xmath181 , s. chen@xmath252 , t. chen@xmath252 , x. chen@xmath168 , s. cheng@xmath182 , a. cheplakov@xmath129 , v.f . chepurnov@xmath129 , r. cherkaoui el moursli@xmath253 , v. chernyatin@xmath105 , e. cheu@xmath254 , s.l . cheung@xmath183 , l. chevalier@xmath180 , f. chevallier@xmath180 , g. chiefari@xmath139 , l. chikovani@xmath255 , j.t . childers@xmath149 , a. chilingarov@xmath194 , g. chiodini@xmath246 , m.v . chizhov@xmath129 , g. choudalakis@xmath148 , s. chouridou@xmath186 , i.a . christidi@xmath184 , a. christov@xmath93 , d. chromek - burckhart@xmath128 , j. chudoba@xmath256 , g. ciapetti@xmath167 , k. ciba@xmath257 , a.k . ciftci@xmath237 , r. ciftci@xmath237 , d. cinca@xmath236 , v. cindro@xmath258 , m.d . ciobotaru@xmath210 , c. ciocca@xmath153 , a. ciocio@xmath163 , m. cirilli@xmath165 , m. ciubancan@xmath131 , a. clark@xmath96 , p.j . clark@xmath215 , w. cleland@xmath223 , j.c . clemens@xmath157 , b. clement@xmath127 , c. clement@xmath170 , r.w . clifft@xmath111 , y. coadou@xmath157 , m. cobal@xmath247 , a. coccaro@xmath189 , j. cochran@xmath251 , p. coe@xmath97 , j.g . cogan@xmath159 , j. coggeshall@xmath211 , e. cogneras@xmath217 , c.d . cojocaru@xmath161 , j. colas@xmath158 , a.p . colijn@xmath213 , c. collard@xmath102 , n.j . collins@xmath187 , c. collins - tooth@xmath137 , j. collot@xmath127 , g. colon@xmath227 , r. coluccia@xmath216 , g. comune@xmath100 , p. conde muio@xmath143 , e. coniavitis@xmath97 , m.c . conidi@xmath95 , m. consonni@xmath250 , s. constantinescu@xmath131 , c. conta@xmath240 , f. conventi@xmath244@xmath259 , j. cook@xmath128 , m. cooke@xmath163 , b.d . cooper@xmath184 , a.m. cooper - sarkar@xmath97 , n.j . cooper - smith@xmath126 , k. copic@xmath147 , t. cornelissen@xmath189 , m. corradi@xmath206 , f. corriveau@xmath249@xmath260 , a. cortes - gonzalez@xmath211 , g. cortiana@xmath108 , g. costa@xmath130 , m.j . costa@xmath145 , d. costanzo@xmath146 , t. costin@xmath148 , d. ct@xmath128 , l. courneyea@xmath172 , g. cowan@xmath126 , c. cowden@xmath169 , b.e . cox@xmath138 , k. cranmer@xmath233 , f. crescioli@xmath214 , m. cristinziani@xmath133 , g. crosetti@xmath242 , r. crupi@xmath216 , s. crp - renaudin@xmath127 , c. cuenca almenar@xmath107 , t. cuhadar donszelmann@xmath146 , s. cuneo@xmath189 , m. curatolo@xmath151 , c.j . curtis@xmath187 , p. cwetanski@xmath230 , h. czirr@xmath232 , z. czyczula@xmath234 , s. dauria@xmath137 , m. donofrio@xmath136 , a. dorazio@xmath167 , a. da rocha gesualdi mello@xmath239 , p.v.m . da silva@xmath239 , c. da via@xmath138 , w. dabrowski@xmath257 , a. dahlhoff@xmath93 , t. dai@xmath165 , c. dallapiccola@xmath227 , s.j . dallison@xmath111@xmath164 , m. dam@xmath218 , m. dameri@xmath189 , d.s . damiani@xmath186 , h.o . danielsson@xmath128 , r. dankers@xmath213 , d. dannheim@xmath108 , v. dao@xmath96 , g. darbo@xmath200 , g.l . darlea@xmath261 , c. daum@xmath213 , j.p . dauvergne @xmath128 , w. davey@xmath188 , t. davidek@xmath262 , n. davidson@xmath188 , r. davidson@xmath194 , m. davies@xmath177 , a.r . davison@xmath184 , e. dawe@xmath263 , i. dawson@xmath146 , j.w . dawson@xmath171@xmath164 , r.k . daya@xmath264 , k. de@xmath225 , r. de asmundis@xmath244 , s. de castro@xmath153 , p.e . de castro faria salgado@xmath105 , s. de cecco@xmath199 , j. de graat@xmath109 , n. de groot@xmath250 , p. de jong@xmath213 , c. de la taille@xmath102 , h. de la torre@xmath192 , b. de lotto@xmath247 , l. de mora@xmath194 , l. de nooij@xmath213 , m. de oliveira branco@xmath128 , d. de pedis@xmath156 , p. de saintignon@xmath127 , a. de salvo@xmath156 , u. de sanctis@xmath247 , a. de santo@xmath195 , j.b . de vivie de regie@xmath102 , s. dean@xmath184 , d.v . dedovich@xmath129 , j. degenhardt@xmath135 , m. dehchar@xmath97 , m. deile@xmath109 , c. del papa@xmath247 , j. del peso@xmath192 , t. del prete@xmath214 , a. dellacqua@xmath128 , l. dellasta@xmath103 , m. della pietra@xmath244@xmath259 , d. della volpe@xmath139 , m. delmastro@xmath128 , p. delpierre@xmath157 , n. delruelle@xmath128 , p.a . delsart@xmath127 , c. deluca@xmath117 , s. demers@xmath107 , m. demichev@xmath129 , b. demirkoz@xmath95 , j. deng@xmath210 , s.p . denisov@xmath142 , d. derendarz@xmath185 , j.e . derkaoui@xmath265 , f. derue@xmath199 , p. dervan@xmath136 , k. desch@xmath133 , e. devetak@xmath117 , p.o . deviveiros@xmath183 , a. dewhurst@xmath111 , b. dewilde@xmath117 , s. dhaliwal@xmath183 , r. dhullipudi@xmath105@xmath266 , a. di ciaccio@xmath119 , l. di ciaccio@xmath158 , a. di girolamo@xmath128 , b. di girolamo@xmath128 , s. di luise@xmath179 , a. di mattia@xmath100 , b. di micco@xmath179 , r. di nardo@xmath119 , a. di simone@xmath119 , r. di sipio@xmath153 , m.a . diaz@xmath267 , f. diblen@xmath202 , e.b . diehl@xmath165 , h. dietl@xmath108 , j. dietrich@xmath93 , t.a . dietzsch@xmath149 , s. diglio@xmath102 , k. dindar yagci@xmath264 , j. dingfelder@xmath133 , c. dionisi@xmath167 , p. dita@xmath131 , s. dita@xmath131 , f. dittus@xmath128 , f. djama@xmath157 , r. djilkibaev@xmath233 , t. djobava@xmath255 , m.a.b . do vale@xmath239 , a. do valle wemans@xmath143 , t.k.o . doan@xmath158 , m. dobbs@xmath249 , r. dobinson @xmath128@xmath164 , d. dobos@xmath235 , e. dobson@xmath128 , m. dobson@xmath210 , j. dodd@xmath147 , o.b . dogan@xmath120@xmath164 , c. doglioni@xmath97 , t. doherty@xmath137 , y. doi@xmath141@xmath164 , j. dolejsi@xmath262 , i. dolenc@xmath258 , z. dolezal@xmath262 , b.a . dolgoshein@xmath154@xmath164 , t. dohmae@xmath122 , m. donadelli@xmath268 , m. donega@xmath135 , j. donini@xmath127 , j. dopke@xmath190 , a. doria@xmath244 , a. dos anjos@xmath168 , m. dosil@xmath95 , a. dotti@xmath214 , m.t . dova@xmath150 , j.d . dowell@xmath187 , a.d . doxiadis@xmath213 , a.t . doyle@xmath137 , z. drasal@xmath262 , j. drees@xmath190 , n. dressnandt@xmath135 , h. drevermann@xmath128 , c. driouichi@xmath218 , m. dris@xmath132 , j.g . drohan@xmath184 , j. dubbert@xmath108 , t. dubbs@xmath186 , s. dube@xmath163 , e. duchovni@xmath140 , g. duckeck@xmath109 , a. dudarev@xmath128 , f. dudziak@xmath251 , m. dhrssen @xmath128 , i.p . duerdoth@xmath138 , l. duflot@xmath102 , m - a . dufour@xmath249 , m. dunford@xmath128 , h. duran yildiz@xmath269 , r. duxfield@xmath146 , m. dwuznik@xmath257 , f. dydak @xmath128 , d. dzahini@xmath127 , m. dren@xmath173 , w.l . ebenstein@xmath160 , j. ebke@xmath109 , s. eckert@xmath93 , s. eckweiler@xmath115 , k. edmonds@xmath115 , c.a . edwards@xmath126 , i. efthymiopoulos@xmath96 , w. ehrenfeld@xmath201 , t. ehrich@xmath108 , t. eifert@xmath128 , g. eigen@xmath231 , k. einsweiler@xmath163 , e. eisenhandler@xmath110 , t. ekelof@xmath205 , m. el kacimi@xmath158 , m. ellert@xmath205 , s. elles@xmath158 , f. ellinghaus@xmath115 , k. ellis@xmath110 , n. ellis@xmath128 , j. elmsheuser@xmath109 , m. elsing@xmath128 , r. ely@xmath163 , d. emeliyanov@xmath111 , r. engelmann@xmath117 , a. engl@xmath109 , b. epp@xmath270 , a. eppig@xmath165 , j. erdmann@xmath176 , a. ereditato@xmath197 , d. eriksson@xmath220 , j. ernst@xmath125 , m. ernst@xmath105 , j. ernwein@xmath180 , d. errede@xmath211 , s. errede@xmath211 , e. ertel@xmath115 , m. escalier@xmath102 , c. escobar@xmath145 , x. espinal curull@xmath95 , b. esposito@xmath151 , f. etienne@xmath157 , a.i . etienvre@xmath180 , e. etzion@xmath101 , d. evangelakou@xmath176 , h. evans@xmath230 , l. fabbri@xmath153 , c. fabre@xmath128 , k. facius@xmath218 , r.m . fakhrutdinov@xmath142 , s. falciano@xmath156 , a.c . falou@xmath102 , y. fang@xmath168 , m. fanti@xmath103 , a. farbin@xmath225 , a. farilla@xmath191 , j. farley@xmath117 , t. farooque@xmath183 , s.m . farrington@xmath97 , p. farthouat@xmath128 , d. fasching@xmath168 , p. fassnacht@xmath128 , d. fassouliotis@xmath152 , b. fatholahzadeh@xmath183 , a. favareto@xmath103 , l. fayard@xmath102 , s. fazio@xmath242 , r. febbraro@xmath236 , p. federic@xmath196 , o.l . fedin@xmath271 , i. fedorko@xmath128 , w. fedorko@xmath100 , m. fehling - kaschek@xmath93 , l. feligioni@xmath157 , d. fellmann@xmath171 , c.u . felzmann@xmath188 , c. feng@xmath272 , e.j . feng@xmath148 , a.b . fenyuk@xmath142 , j. ferencei@xmath155 , j. ferland@xmath177 , b. fernandes@xmath143@xmath144 , w. fernando@xmath273 , s. ferrag@xmath137 , j. ferrando@xmath97 , v. ferrara@xmath201 , a. ferrari@xmath205 , p. ferrari@xmath213 , r. ferrari@xmath207 , a. ferrer@xmath145 , m.l . ferrer@xmath151 , d. ferrere@xmath96 , c. ferretti@xmath165 , a. ferretto parodi@xmath189 , m. fiascaris@xmath148 , f. fiedler@xmath115 , a. filipi@xmath258 , a. filippas@xmath132 , f. filthaut@xmath250 , m. fincke - keeler@xmath172 , m.c.n . fiolhais@xmath143@xmath245 , l. fiorini@xmath95 , a. firan@xmath264 , g. fischer@xmath201 , p. fischer @xmath133 , m.j . fisher@xmath273 , s.m . fisher@xmath111 , j. flammer@xmath128 , m. flechl@xmath93 , i. fleck@xmath232 , j. fleckner@xmath115 , p. fleischmann@xmath274 , s. fleischmann@xmath190 , t. flick@xmath190 , l.r . flores castillo@xmath168 , m.j . flowerdew@xmath108 , f. fhlisch@xmath149 , m. fokitis@xmath132 , t. fonseca martin@xmath197 , d.a . forbush@xmath275 , a. formica@xmath180 , a. forti@xmath138 , d. fortin@xmath241 , j.m . foster@xmath138 , d. fournier@xmath102 , a. foussat@xmath128 , a.j . fowler@xmath160 , k. fowler@xmath186 , h. fox@xmath194 , p. francavilla@xmath214 , s. franchino@xmath240 , d. francis@xmath128 , t. frank@xmath140 , m. franklin@xmath193 , s. franz@xmath128 , m. fraternali@xmath240 , s. fratina@xmath135 , s.t . french@xmath169 , r. froeschl@xmath128 , d. froidevaux@xmath128 , j.a . frost@xmath169 , c. fukunaga@xmath226 , e. fullana torregrosa@xmath128 , j. fuster@xmath145 , c. gabaldon@xmath128 , o. gabizon@xmath140 , t. gadfort@xmath105 , s. gadomski@xmath96 , g. gagliardi@xmath189 , p. gagnon@xmath230 , c. galea@xmath109 , e.j . gallas@xmath97 , m.v . gallas@xmath128 , v. gallo@xmath197 , b.j . gallop@xmath111 , p. gallus@xmath256 , e. galyaev@xmath118 , k.k . gan@xmath273 , y.s . gao@xmath159@xmath198 , v.a . gapienko@xmath142 , a. gaponenko@xmath163 , f. garberson@xmath107 , m. garcia - sciveres@xmath163 , c. garca@xmath145 , j.e . garca navarro@xmath96 , r.w . gardner@xmath148 , n. garelli@xmath128 , h. garitaonandia@xmath213 , v. garonne@xmath128 , j. garvey@xmath187 , c. gatti@xmath151 , g. gaudio@xmath207 , o. gaumer@xmath96 , b. gaur@xmath232 , l. gauthier@xmath180 , i.l . gavrilenko@xmath123 , c. gay@xmath175 , g. gaycken@xmath133 , j - c . gayde@xmath128 , e.n . gazis@xmath132 , p. ge@xmath272 , c.n.p . gee@xmath111 , d.a.a . geerts@xmath213 , ch . geich - gimbel@xmath133 , k. gellerstedt@xmath170 , c. gemme@xmath200 , a. gemmell@xmath137 , m.h . genest@xmath109 , s. gentile@xmath167 , m. george@xmath176 , s. george@xmath126 , p. gerlach@xmath190 , a. gershon@xmath101 , c. geweniger@xmath149 , p. ghez@xmath158 , n. ghodbane@xmath236 , b. giacobbe@xmath206 , s. giagu@xmath167 , v. giakoumopoulou@xmath152 , v. giangiobbe@xmath214 , f. gianotti@xmath128 , b. gibbard@xmath105 , a. gibson@xmath183 , s.m . gibson@xmath128 , g.f . gieraltowski@xmath171 , l.m . gilbert@xmath97 , m. gilchriese@xmath163 , v. gilewsky@xmath276 , d. gillberg@xmath161 , a.r . gillman@xmath111 , d.m . gingrich@xmath181@xmath178 , j. ginzburg@xmath101 , n. giokaris@xmath152 , r. giordano@xmath139 , f.m . giorgi@xmath134 , p. giovannini@xmath108 , p.f . giraud@xmath180 , d. giugni@xmath130 , p. giusti@xmath206 , b.k . gjelsten@xmath234 , l.k . gladilin@xmath277 , c. glasman@xmath192 , j. glatzer@xmath93 , a. glazov@xmath201 , k.w . glitza@xmath190 , g.l . glonti@xmath129 , j. godfrey@xmath263 , j. godlewski@xmath128 , m. goebel@xmath201 , t. gpfert@xmath278 , c. goeringer@xmath115 , c. gssling@xmath235 , t. gttfert@xmath108 , s. goldfarb@xmath165 , d. goldin@xmath264 , t. golling@xmath107 , s.n . golovnia@xmath142 , a. gomes@xmath143@xmath144 , l.s . gomez fajardo@xmath201 , r. gonalo@xmath126 , j. goncalves pinto firmino da costa@xmath201 , l. gonella@xmath133 , a. gonidec@xmath128 , s. gonzalez@xmath168 , s. gonzlez de la hoz@xmath145 , m.l . gonzalez silva@xmath279 , s. gonzalez - sevilla@xmath96 , j.j . goodson@xmath117 , l. goossens@xmath128 , p.a . gorbounov@xmath166 , h.a . gordon@xmath105 , i. gorelov@xmath280 , g. gorfine@xmath190 , b. gorini@xmath128 , e. gorini@xmath216 , a. goriek@xmath258 , e. gornicki@xmath185 , s.a . gorokhov@xmath142 , v.n . goryachev@xmath142 , b. gosdzik@xmath201 , m. gosselink@xmath213 , m.i . gostkin@xmath129 , m. gouanre@xmath158 , i. gough eschrich@xmath210 , m. gouighri@xmath209 , d. goujdami@xmath209 , m.p . goulette@xmath96 , a.g . goussiou@xmath275 , c. goy@xmath158 , i. grabowska - bold@xmath210@xmath221 , v. grabski@xmath281 , p. grafstrm@xmath128 , c. grah@xmath190 , k - j . grahn@xmath282 , f. grancagnolo@xmath246 , s. grancagnolo@xmath134 , v. grassi@xmath117 , v. gratchev@xmath271 , n. grau@xmath147 , h.m . gray@xmath128 , j.a . gray@xmath117 , e. graziani@xmath191 , o.g . grebenyuk@xmath271 , d. greenfield@xmath111 , t. greenshaw@xmath136 , z.d . greenwood@xmath105@xmath266 , i.m . gregor@xmath201 , p. grenier@xmath159 , e. griesmayer@xmath283 , j. griffiths@xmath275 , n. grigalashvili@xmath129 , a.a . grillo@xmath186 , s. grinstein@xmath95 , p.l.y . gris@xmath236 , y.v . grishkevich@xmath277 , j .- f . grivaz@xmath102 , j. grognuz@xmath128 , m. groh@xmath108 , e. gross@xmath140 , j. grosse - knetter@xmath176 , j. groth - jensen@xmath121 , m. gruwe@xmath128 , k. grybel@xmath232 , v.j . guarino@xmath171 , d. guest@xmath107 , c. guicheney@xmath236 , a. guida@xmath216 , t. guillemin@xmath158 , s. guindon@xmath176 , h. guler@xmath249@xmath284 , j. gunther@xmath256 , b. guo@xmath183 , j. guo@xmath147 , a. gupta@xmath148 , y. gusakov@xmath129 , v.n . gushchin@xmath142 , a. gutierrez@xmath177 , p. gutierrez@xmath94 , n. guttman@xmath101 , o. gutzwiller@xmath168 , c. guyot@xmath180 , c. gwenlan@xmath97 , c.b . gwilliam@xmath136 , a. haas@xmath159 , s. haas@xmath128 , c. haber@xmath163 , r. hackenburg@xmath105 , h.k . hadavand@xmath264 , d.r . hadley@xmath187 , p. haefner@xmath108 , f. hahn@xmath128 , s. haider@xmath128 , z. hajduk@xmath185 , h. hakobyan@xmath281 , j. haller@xmath176 , k. hamacher@xmath190 , p. hamal@xmath285 , a. hamilton@xmath96 , s. hamilton@xmath286 , h. han@xmath182 , l. han@xmath287 , k. hanagaki@xmath288 , m. hance@xmath135 , c. handel@xmath115 , p. hanke@xmath149 , c.j . hansen@xmath205 , j.r . hansen@xmath218 , j.b . hansen@xmath218 , j.d . hansen@xmath218 , p.h . hansen@xmath218 , p. hansson@xmath159 , k. hara@xmath289 , g.a . hare@xmath186 , t. harenberg@xmath190 , d. harper@xmath165 , r.d . harrington@xmath116 , o.m . harris@xmath275 , k. harrison@xmath187 , j. hartert@xmath93 , f. hartjes@xmath213 , t. haruyama@xmath141 , a. harvey@xmath106 , s. hasegawa@xmath290 , y. hasegawa@xmath291 , s. hassani@xmath180 , m. hatch@xmath128 , d. hauff@xmath108 , s. haug@xmath197 , m. hauschild@xmath128 , r. hauser@xmath100 , m. havranek@xmath133 , b.m . hawes@xmath97 , c.m . hawkes@xmath187 , r.j . hawkings@xmath128 , d. hawkins@xmath210 , t. hayakawa@xmath124 , d hayden@xmath126 , h.s . hayward@xmath136 , s.j . haywood@xmath111 , e. hazen@xmath116 , m. he@xmath272 , s.j . head@xmath187 , v. hedberg@xmath121 , l. heelan@xmath225 , s. heim@xmath100 , b. heinemann@xmath163 , s. heisterkamp@xmath218 , l. helary@xmath158 , m. heldmann@xmath93 , m. heller@xmath102 , s. hellman@xmath170 , c. helsens@xmath95 , r.c.w . henderson@xmath194 , m. henke@xmath149 , a. henrichs@xmath176 , a.m. henriques correia@xmath128 , s. henrot - versille@xmath102 , f. henry - couannier@xmath157 , c. hensel@xmath176 , t. hen@xmath190 , y. hernndez jimnez@xmath145 , r. herrberg@xmath134 , a.d . hershenhorn@xmath203 , g. herten@xmath93 , r. hertenberger@xmath109 , l. hervas@xmath128 , n.p . hessey@xmath213 , a. hidvegi@xmath220 , e. hign - rodriguez@xmath145 , d. hill@xmath171@xmath164 , j.c . hill@xmath169 , n. hill@xmath171 , k.h . hiller@xmath201 , s. hillert@xmath133 , s.j . hillier@xmath187 , i. hinchliffe@xmath163 , e. hines@xmath135 , m. hirose@xmath288 , f. hirsch@xmath235 , d. hirschbuehl@xmath190 , j. hobbs@xmath117 , n. hod@xmath101 , m.c . hodgkinson@xmath146 , p. hodgson@xmath146 , a. hoecker@xmath128 , m.r . hoeferkamp@xmath280 , j. hoffman@xmath264 , d. hoffmann@xmath157 , m. hohlfeld@xmath115 , m. holder@xmath232 , a. holmes@xmath97 , s.o . holmgren@xmath220 , t. holy@xmath174 , j.l . holzbauer@xmath100 , y. homma@xmath124 , l. hooft van huysduynen@xmath233 , c. horn@xmath159 , s. horner@xmath93 , k. horton@xmath97 , j - y . hostachy@xmath127 , t. hott@xmath108 , s. hou@xmath292 , m.a . houlden@xmath136 , a. hoummada@xmath209 , j. howarth@xmath138 , d.f . howell@xmath97 , i. hristova @xmath201 , j. hrivnac@xmath102 , i. hruska@xmath256 , t. hrynova@xmath158 , p.j . hsu@xmath107 , s .- c . hsu@xmath163 , g.s . huang@xmath94 , z. hubacek@xmath174 , f. hubaut@xmath157 , f. huegging@xmath133 , t.b . huffman@xmath97 , e.w . hughes@xmath147 , g. hughes@xmath194 , r.e . hughes - jones@xmath138 , m. huhtinen@xmath128 , p. hurst@xmath193 , m. hurwitz@xmath163 , u. husemann@xmath201 , n. huseynov@xmath129@xmath293 , j. huston@xmath100 , j. huth@xmath193 , g. iacobucci@xmath244 , g. iakovidis@xmath132 , m. ibbotson@xmath138 , i. ibragimov@xmath232 , r. ichimiya@xmath124 , l. iconomidou - fayard@xmath102 , j. idarraga@xmath102 , m. idzik@xmath257 , p. iengo@xmath158 , o. igonkina@xmath213 , y. ikegami@xmath141 , m. ikeno@xmath141 , y. ilchenko@xmath264 , d. iliadis@xmath294 , d. imbault@xmath199 , m. imhaeuser@xmath190 , m. imori@xmath122 , t. ince@xmath133 , j. inigo - golfin@xmath128 , p. ioannou@xmath152 , m. iodice@xmath191 , g. ionescu@xmath158 , a. irles quiles@xmath145 , k. ishii@xmath141 , a. ishikawa@xmath124 , m. ishino@xmath141 , r. ishmukhametov@xmath264 , c. issever@xmath97 , s. istin@xmath120 , y. itoh@xmath290 , a.v . ivashin@xmath142 , w. iwanski@xmath185 , h. iwasaki@xmath141 , j.m . izen@xmath118 , v. izzo@xmath244 , b. jackson@xmath135 , j.n . jackson@xmath136 , p. jackson@xmath159 , m.r . jaekel@xmath128 , v. jain@xmath230 , k. jakobs@xmath93 , s. jakobsen@xmath218 , j. jakubek@xmath174 , d.k . jana@xmath94 , e. jankowski@xmath183 , e. jansen@xmath184 , a. jantsch@xmath108 , m. janus@xmath133 , g. jarlskog@xmath121 , l. jeanty@xmath193 , k. jelen@xmath257 , i. jen - la plante@xmath148 , p. jenni@xmath128 , a. jeremie@xmath158 , p. je@xmath218 , s. jzquel@xmath158 , m.k . jha@xmath206 , h. ji@xmath168 , w. ji@xmath115 , j. jia@xmath117 , y. jiang@xmath287 , m. jimenez belenguer@xmath201 , g. jin@xmath287 , s. jin@xmath182 , o. jinnouchi@xmath295 , m.d . joergensen@xmath218 , d. joffe@xmath264 , l.g . johansen@xmath231 , m. johansen@xmath170 , k.e . johansson@xmath220 , p. johansson@xmath146 , s. johnert@xmath201 , k.a . johns@xmath254 , k. jon - and@xmath170 , g. jones@xmath138 , r.w.l . jones@xmath194 , t.w . jones@xmath184 , t.j . jones@xmath136 , o. jonsson@xmath128 , c. joram@xmath128 , p.m. jorge@xmath143@xmath144 , j. joseph@xmath163 , x. ju@xmath212 , v. juranek@xmath256 , p. jussel@xmath270 , v.v . kabachenko@xmath142 , s. kabana@xmath197 , m. kaci@xmath145 , a. kaczmarska@xmath185 , p. kadlecik@xmath218 , m. kado@xmath102 , h. kagan@xmath273 , m. kagan@xmath193 , s. kaiser@xmath108 , e. kajomovitz@xmath203 , s. kalinin@xmath190 , l.v . kalinovskaya@xmath129 , s. kama@xmath264 , n. kanaya@xmath122 , m. kaneda@xmath122 , t. kanno@xmath295 , v.a . kantserov@xmath154 , j. kanzaki@xmath141 , b. kaplan@xmath107 , a. kapliy@xmath148 , j. kaplon@xmath128 , d. kar@xmath278 , m. karagoz@xmath97 , m. karnevskiy@xmath201 , k. karr@xmath171 , v. kartvelishvili@xmath194 , a.n . karyukhin@xmath142 , l. kashif@xmath168 , a. kasmi@xmath264 , r.d . kass@xmath273 , a. kastanas@xmath231 , m. kataoka@xmath158 , y. kataoka@xmath122 , e. katsoufis@xmath132 , j. katzy@xmath201 , v. kaushik@xmath254 , k. kawagoe@xmath124 , t. kawamoto@xmath122 , g. kawamura@xmath115 , m.s . kayl@xmath213 , v.a . kazanin@xmath208 , m.y . kazarinov@xmath129 , s.i . kazi@xmath188 , j.r . keates@xmath138 , r. keeler@xmath172 , r. kehoe@xmath264 , m. keil@xmath176 , g.d . kekelidze@xmath129 , m. kelly@xmath138 , j. kennedy@xmath109 , m. kenyon@xmath137 , o. kepka@xmath256 , n. kerschen@xmath128 , b.p . kerevan@xmath258 , s. kersten@xmath190 , k. kessoku@xmath122 , c. ketterer@xmath93 , m. khakzad@xmath161 , f. khalil - zada@xmath98 , h. khandanyan@xmath211 , a. khanov@xmath99 , d. kharchenko@xmath129 , a. khodinov@xmath117 , a.g . kholodenko@xmath142 , a. khomich@xmath149 , t.j . khoo@xmath169 , g. khoriauli@xmath133 , n. khovanskiy@xmath129 , v. khovanskiy@xmath166 , e. khramov@xmath129 , j. khubua@xmath255 , g. kilvington@xmath126 , h. kim@xmath225 , m.s . kim@xmath181 , p.c . kim@xmath159 , s.h . kim@xmath289 , n. kimura@xmath296 , o. kind@xmath134 , b.t . king@xmath136 , m. king@xmath124 , r.s.b . king@xmath97 , j. kirk@xmath111 , g.p . kirsch@xmath97 , l.e . kirsch@xmath112 , a.e . kiryunin@xmath108 , d. kisielewska@xmath257 , t. kittelmann@xmath223 , a.m. kiver@xmath142 , h. kiyamura@xmath124 , e. kladiva@xmath155 , j. klaiber - lodewigs@xmath235 , m. klein@xmath136 , u. klein@xmath136 , k. kleinknecht@xmath115 , m. klemetti@xmath249 , a. klier@xmath140 , a. klimentov@xmath105 , r. klingenberg@xmath235 , e.b . klinkby@xmath218 , t. klioutchnikova@xmath128 , p.f . klok@xmath250 , s. klous@xmath213 , e .- e . kluge@xmath149 , t. kluge@xmath136 , p. kluit@xmath213 , s. kluth@xmath108 , e. kneringer@xmath270 , j. knobloch@xmath128 , e.b.f.g . knoops@xmath157 , a. knue@xmath176 , b.r . ko@xmath160 , t. kobayashi@xmath122 , m. kobel@xmath278 , b. koblitz@xmath128 , m. kocian@xmath159 , a. kocnar@xmath285 , p. kodys@xmath262 , k. kneke@xmath128 , a.c . knig@xmath250 , s. koenig@xmath115 , s. knig@xmath93 , l. kpke@xmath115 , f. koetsveld@xmath250 , p. koevesarki@xmath133 , t. koffas@xmath128 , e. koffeman@xmath213 , f. kohn@xmath176 , z. kohout@xmath174 , t. kohriki@xmath141 , t. koi@xmath159 , t. kokott@xmath133 , g.m . kolachev@xmath208 , h. kolanoski@xmath134 , v. kolesnikov@xmath129 , i. koletsou@xmath130 , j. koll@xmath100 , d. kollar@xmath128 , m. kollefrath@xmath93 , s.d . kolya@xmath138 , a.a . komar@xmath123 , j.r . komaragiri@xmath263 , t. kondo@xmath141 , t. kono@xmath201@xmath297 , a.i . kononov@xmath93 , r. konoplich@xmath233@xmath298 , n. konstantinidis@xmath184 , a. kootz@xmath190 , s. koperny@xmath257 , s.v . kopikov@xmath142 , k. korcyl@xmath185 , k. kordas@xmath294 , v. koreshev@xmath142 , a. korn@xmath163 , a. korol@xmath208 , i. korolkov@xmath95 , e.v . korolkova@xmath146 , v.a . korotkov@xmath142 , o. kortner@xmath108 , s. kortner@xmath108 , v.v . kostyukhin@xmath133 , m.j . kotamki@xmath128 , s. kotov@xmath108 , v.m . kotov@xmath129 , c. kourkoumelis@xmath152 , v. kouskoura@xmath294 , a. koutsman@xmath213 , r. kowalewski@xmath172 , t.z . kowalski@xmath257 , w. kozanecki@xmath180 , a.s . kozhin@xmath142 , v. kral@xmath174 , v.a . kramarenko@xmath277 , g. kramberger@xmath258 , o. krasel@xmath235 , m.w . krasny@xmath199 , a. krasznahorkay@xmath233 , j. kraus@xmath100 , a. kreisel@xmath101 , f. krejci@xmath174 , j. kretzschmar@xmath136 , n. krieger@xmath176 , p. krieger@xmath183 , k. kroeninger@xmath176 , h. kroha@xmath108 , j. kroll@xmath135 , j. kroseberg@xmath133 , j. krstic@xmath222 , u. kruchonak@xmath129 , h. krger@xmath133 , z.v . krumshteyn@xmath129 , a. kruth@xmath133 , t. kubota@xmath122 , s. kuehn@xmath93 , a. kugel@xmath299 , t. kuhl@xmath190 , d. kuhn@xmath270 , v. kukhtin@xmath129 , y. kulchitsky@xmath219 , s. kuleshov@xmath229 , c. kummer@xmath109 , m. kuna@xmath157 , n. kundu@xmath97 , j. kunkle@xmath135 , a. kupco@xmath256 , h. kurashige@xmath124 , m. kurata@xmath289 , y.a . kurochkin@xmath219 , v. kus@xmath256 , w. kuykendall@xmath275 , m. kuze@xmath295 , p. kuzhir@xmath276 , o. kvasnicka@xmath256 , j. kvita@xmath128 , r. kwee@xmath134 , a. la rosa@xmath128 , l. la rotonda@xmath242 , l. labarga@xmath192 , j. labbe@xmath158 , s. lablak@xmath209 , c. lacasta@xmath145 , f. lacava@xmath167 , h. lacker@xmath134 , d. lacour@xmath199 , v.r . lacuesta@xmath145 , e. ladygin@xmath129 , r. lafaye@xmath158 , b. laforge@xmath199 , t. lagouri@xmath192 , s. lai@xmath93 , e. laisne@xmath127 , m. lamanna@xmath128 , c.l . lampen@xmath254 , w. lampl@xmath254 , e. lancon@xmath180 , u. landgraf@xmath93 , m.p.j . landon@xmath110 , h. landsman@xmath203 , j.l . lane@xmath138 , c. lange@xmath201 , a.j . lankford@xmath210 , f. lanni@xmath105 , k. lantzsch@xmath128 , v.v . lapin@xmath142@xmath164 , s. laplace@xmath199 , c. lapoire@xmath133 , j.f . laporte@xmath180 , t. lari@xmath130 , a.v . larionov @xmath142 , a. larner@xmath97 , c. lasseur@xmath128 , m. lassnig@xmath128 , w. lau@xmath97 , p. laurelli@xmath151 , a. lavorato@xmath97 , w. lavrijsen@xmath163 , p. laycock@xmath136 , a.b . lazarev@xmath129 , a. lazzaro@xmath103 , o. le dortz@xmath199 , e. le guirriec@xmath157 , c. le maner@xmath183 , e. le menedeu@xmath180 , m. leahu@xmath128 , a. lebedev@xmath251 , c. lebel@xmath177 , t. lecompte@xmath171 , f. ledroit - guillon@xmath127 , h. lee@xmath213 , j.s.h . lee@xmath300 , s.c . lee@xmath292 , l. lee@xmath107 , m. lefebvre@xmath172 , m. legendre@xmath180 , a. leger@xmath96 , b.c . legeyt@xmath135 , f. legger@xmath109 , c. leggett@xmath163 , m. lehmacher@xmath133 , g. lehmann miotto@xmath128 , x. lei@xmath254 , m.a.l . leite@xmath268 , r. leitner@xmath262 , d. lellouch@xmath140 , j. lellouch@xmath199 , m. leltchouk@xmath147 , v. lendermann@xmath149 , k.j.c . leney@xmath301 , t. lenz@xmath190 , g. lenzen@xmath190 , b. lenzi@xmath180 , k. leonhardt@xmath278 , s. leontsinis@xmath132 , c. leroy@xmath177 , j - r . lessard@xmath172 , j. lesser@xmath220 , c.g . lester@xmath169 , a. leung fook cheong@xmath168 , j. levque@xmath157 , d. levin@xmath165 , l.j . levinson@xmath140 , m.s . levitski@xmath142 , m. lewandowska@xmath116 , g.h . lewis@xmath233 , m. leyton@xmath134 , b. li@xmath157 , h. li@xmath168 , s. li@xmath287 , x. li@xmath165 , z. liang@xmath264 , z. liang@xmath97@xmath302 , b. liberti@xmath243 , p. lichard@xmath128 , m. lichtnecker@xmath109 , k. lie@xmath211 , w. liebig@xmath231 , r. lifshitz@xmath203 , j.n . lilley@xmath187 , c. limbach@xmath133 , a. limosani@xmath188 , m. limper@xmath204 , s.c . lin@xmath292@xmath303 , f. linde@xmath213 , j.t . linnemann@xmath100 , e. lipeles@xmath135 , l. lipinsky@xmath256 , a. lipniacka@xmath231 , t.m . liss@xmath211 , d. lissauer@xmath105 , a. lister@xmath96 , a.m. litke@xmath186 , c. liu@xmath161 , d. liu@xmath292@xmath304 , h. liu@xmath165 , j.b . liu@xmath165 , m. liu@xmath287 , s. liu@xmath181 , y. liu@xmath287 , m. livan@xmath240 , s.s.a . livermore@xmath97 , a. lleres@xmath127 , s.l . lloyd@xmath110 , e. lobodzinska@xmath201 , p. loch@xmath254 , w.s . lockman@xmath186 , s. lockwitz@xmath107 , t. loddenkoetter@xmath133 , f.k . loebinger@xmath138 , a. loginov@xmath107 , c.w . loh@xmath175 , t. lohse@xmath134 , k. lohwasser@xmath93 , m. lokajicek@xmath256 , j. loken @xmath97 , v.p . lombardo@xmath130 , r.e . long@xmath194 , l. lopes@xmath143@xmath144 , d. lopez mateos@xmath147@xmath305 , m. losada@xmath306 , p. loscutoff@xmath163 , f. lo sterzo@xmath167 , m.j . losty@xmath241 , x. lou@xmath118 , a. lounis@xmath102 , k.f . loureiro@xmath306 , j. love@xmath116 , p.a . love@xmath194 , a.j . lowe@xmath159@xmath198 , f. lu@xmath182 , j. lu@xmath181 , l. lu@xmath264 , h.j . lubatti@xmath275 , c. luci@xmath167 , a. lucotte@xmath127 , a. ludwig@xmath278 , d. ludwig@xmath201 , i. ludwig@xmath93 , j. ludwig@xmath93 , f. luehring@xmath230 , g. luijckx@xmath213 , d. lumb@xmath93 , l. luminari@xmath156 , e. lund@xmath234 , b. lund - jensen@xmath282 , b. lundberg@xmath121 , j. lundberg@xmath170 , j. lundquist@xmath218 , m. lungwitz@xmath115 , a. lupi@xmath214 , g. lutz@xmath108 , d. lynn@xmath105 , j. lys@xmath163 , e. lytken@xmath121 , h. ma@xmath105 , l.l . ma@xmath168 , j.a . macana goia@xmath177 , g. maccarrone@xmath151 , a. macchiolo@xmath108 , b. maek@xmath258 , j. machado miguens@xmath143 , d. macina@xmath96 , r. mackeprang@xmath218 , r.j . madaras@xmath163 , w.f . mader@xmath278 , r. maenner@xmath299 , t. maeno@xmath105 , p. mttig@xmath190 , s. mttig@xmath201 , p.j . magalhaes martins@xmath143@xmath245 , l. magnoni@xmath128 , e. magradze@xmath255 , c.a . magrath@xmath250 , y. mahalalel@xmath101 , k. mahboubi@xmath93 , g. mahout@xmath187 , c. maiani@xmath167 , c. maidantchik@xmath239 , a. maio@xmath143@xmath144 , s. majewski@xmath105 , y. makida@xmath141 , n. makovec@xmath102 , p. mal@xmath254 , pa . malecki@xmath185 , p. malecki@xmath185 , v.p . maleev@xmath271 , f. malek@xmath127 , u. mallik@xmath204 , d. malon@xmath171 , s. maltezos@xmath132 , v. malyshev@xmath208 , s. malyukov@xmath129 , r. mameghani@xmath109 , j. mamuzic@xmath224 , a. manabe@xmath141 , l. mandelli@xmath130 , i. mandi@xmath258 , r. mandrysch@xmath134 , j. maneira@xmath143 , p.s . mangeard@xmath100 , i.d . manjavidze@xmath129 , a. mann@xmath176 , p.m. manning@xmath186 , a. manousakis - katsikakis@xmath152 , b. mansoulie@xmath180 , a. manz@xmath108 , a. mapelli@xmath128 , l. mapelli@xmath128 , l. march @xmath192 , j.f . marchand@xmath128 , f. marchese@xmath119 , m. marchesotti@xmath128 , g. marchiori@xmath199 , m. marcisovsky@xmath256 , a. marin@xmath116@xmath164 , c.p . marino@xmath230 , f. marroquim@xmath239 , r. marshall@xmath138 , z. marshall@xmath147@xmath305 , f.k . martens@xmath183 , s. marti - garcia@xmath145 , a.j . martin@xmath107 , b. martin@xmath128 , b. martin@xmath100 , f.f . martin@xmath135 , j.p . martin@xmath177 , ph . martin@xmath127 , t.a . martin@xmath187 , b. martin dit latour@xmath96 , m. martinez@xmath95 , v. martinez outschoorn@xmath193 , a.c . martyniuk@xmath138 , m. marx@xmath138 , f. marzano@xmath156 , a. marzin@xmath94 , l. masetti@xmath115 , t. mashimo@xmath122 , r. mashinistov@xmath123 , j. masik@xmath138 , a.l . maslennikov@xmath208 , m. ma@xmath235 , i. massa@xmath153 , g. massaro@xmath213 , n. massol@xmath158 , a. mastroberardino@xmath242 , t. masubuchi@xmath122 , m. mathes@xmath133 , p. matricon@xmath102 , h. matsumoto@xmath122 , h. matsunaga@xmath122 , t. matsushita@xmath124 , c. mattravers@xmath97@xmath307 , j.m . maugain@xmath128 , s.j . maxfield@xmath136 , d.a . maximov@xmath208 , e.n . may@xmath171 , a. mayne@xmath146 , r. mazini@xmath292 , m. mazur@xmath133 , m. mazzanti@xmath130 , e. mazzoni@xmath214 , s.p . mc kee@xmath165 , a. mccarn@xmath211 , r.l . mccarthy@xmath117 , t.g . mccarthy@xmath161 , n.a . mccubbin@xmath111 , k.w . mcfarlane@xmath106 , j.a . mcfayden@xmath146 , h. mcglone@xmath137 , g. mchedlidze@xmath255 , r.a . mclaren@xmath128 , t. mclaughlan@xmath187 , s.j . mcmahon@xmath111 , r.a . mcpherson@xmath172@xmath260 , a. meade@xmath227 , j. mechnich@xmath213 , m. mechtel@xmath190 , m. medinnis@xmath201 , r. meera - lebbai@xmath94 , t. meguro@xmath288 , r. mehdiyev@xmath177 , s. mehlhase@xmath218 , a. mehta@xmath136 , k. meier@xmath149 , j. meinhardt@xmath93 , b. meirose@xmath121 , c. melachrinos@xmath148 , b.r . mellado garcia@xmath168 , l. mendoza navas@xmath306 , z. meng@xmath292@xmath304 , a. mengarelli@xmath153 , s. menke@xmath108 , c. menot@xmath128 , e. meoni@xmath95 , k.m . mercurio@xmath193 , p. mermod@xmath97 , l. merola@xmath139 , c. meroni@xmath130 , f.s . merritt@xmath148 , a. messina@xmath128 , j. metcalfe@xmath280 , a.s . mete@xmath251 , s. meuser@xmath133 , c. meyer@xmath115 , j - p . meyer@xmath180 , j. meyer@xmath274 , j. meyer@xmath176 , t.c . meyer@xmath128 , w.t . meyer@xmath251 , j. miao@xmath272 , s. michal@xmath128 , l. micu@xmath131 , r.p . middleton@xmath111 , p. miele@xmath128 , s. migas@xmath136 , l. mijovi@xmath201 , g. mikenberg@xmath140 , m. mikestikova@xmath256 , b. mikulec@xmath96 , m. miku@xmath258 , d.w . miller@xmath159 , r.j . miller@xmath100 , w.j . mills@xmath175 , c. mills@xmath193 , a. milov@xmath140 , d.a . milstead@xmath170 , d. milstein@xmath140 , a.a . minaenko@xmath142 , m. miano@xmath145 , i.a . minashvili@xmath129 , a.i . mincer@xmath233 , b. mindur@xmath257 , m. mineev@xmath129 , y. ming@xmath212 , l.m . mir@xmath95 , g. mirabelli@xmath156 , l. miralles verge@xmath95 , a. misiejuk@xmath126 , j. mitrevski@xmath186 , g.y . mitrofanov@xmath142 , v.a . mitsou@xmath145 , s. mitsui@xmath141 , p.s . miyagawa@xmath138 , k. miyazaki@xmath124 , j.u . mjrnmark@xmath121 , t. moa@xmath170 , p. mockett@xmath275 , s. moed@xmath193 , v. moeller@xmath169 , k. mnig@xmath201 , n. mser@xmath133 , s. mohapatra@xmath117 , b. mohn@xmath231 , w. mohr@xmath93 , s. mohrdieck - mck@xmath108 , a.m. moisseev@xmath142@xmath164 , r. moles - valls@xmath145 , j. molina - perez@xmath128 , l. moneta@xmath96 , j. monk@xmath184 , e. monnier@xmath157 , s. montesano@xmath103 , f. monticelli@xmath150 , s. monzani@xmath153 , r.w . moore@xmath181 , g.f . moorhead@xmath188 , c. mora herrera@xmath96 , a. moraes@xmath137 , a. morais@xmath143@xmath144 , n. morange@xmath180 , g. morello@xmath242 , d. moreno@xmath115 , m. moreno llcer@xmath145 , p. morettini@xmath200 , m. morii@xmath193 , j. morin@xmath110 , y. morita@xmath141 , a.k . morley@xmath128 , g. mornacchi@xmath128 , m - c . morone@xmath96 , s.v . morozov@xmath154 , j.d . morris@xmath110 , h.g . moser@xmath108 , m. mosidze@xmath255 , j. moss@xmath273 , r. mount@xmath159 , e. mountricha@xmath132 , s.v . mouraviev@xmath123 , e.j.w . moyse@xmath227 , m. mudrinic@xmath224 , f. mueller@xmath149 , j. mueller@xmath223 , k. mueller@xmath133 , t.a . mller@xmath109 , d. muenstermann@xmath235 , a. muijs@xmath213 , a. muir@xmath175 , y. munwes@xmath101 , k. murakami@xmath141 , w.j . murray@xmath111 , i. mussche@xmath213 , e. musto@xmath139 , a.g . myagkov@xmath142 , m. myska@xmath256 , j. nadal@xmath95 , k. nagai@xmath289 , k. nagano@xmath141 , y. nagasaka@xmath308 , a.m. nairz@xmath128 , y. nakahama@xmath102 , k. nakamura@xmath122 , i. nakano@xmath309 , g. nanava@xmath133 , a. napier@xmath286 , m. nash@xmath184@xmath307 , n.r . nation@xmath116 , t. nattermann@xmath133 , t. naumann@xmath201 , g. navarro@xmath306 , h.a . neal@xmath165 , e. nebot@xmath192 , p.yu . nechaeva@xmath123 , a. negri@xmath240 , g. negri@xmath128 , s. nektarijevic@xmath96 , a. nelson@xmath251 , s. nelson@xmath159 , t.k . nelson@xmath159 , s. nemecek@xmath256 , p. nemethy@xmath233 , a.a . nepomuceno@xmath239 , m. nessi@xmath128@xmath310 , s.y . nesterov@xmath271 , m.s . neubauer@xmath211 , a. neusiedl@xmath115 , r.m . neves@xmath233 , p. nevski@xmath105 , p.r . newman@xmath187 , r.b . nickerson@xmath97 , r. nicolaidou@xmath180 , l. nicolas@xmath146 , b. nicquevert@xmath128 , f. niedercorn@xmath102 , j. nielsen@xmath186 , t. niinikoski@xmath128 , a. nikiforov@xmath134 , v. nikolaenko@xmath142 , k. nikolaev@xmath129 , i. nikolic - audit@xmath199 , k. nikolopoulos@xmath105 , h. nilsen@xmath93 , p. nilsson@xmath225 , y. ninomiya @xmath122 , a. nisati@xmath156 , t. nishiyama@xmath124 , r. nisius@xmath108 , l. nodulman@xmath171 , m. nomachi@xmath288 , i. nomidis@xmath294 , h. nomoto@xmath122 , m. nordberg@xmath128 , b. nordkvist@xmath170 , p.r . norton@xmath111 , j. novakova@xmath262 , m. nozaki@xmath141 , m. noika@xmath201 , l. nozka@xmath285 , i.m . nugent@xmath241 , a .- e . nuncio - quiroz@xmath133 , g. nunes hanninger@xmath133 , t. nunnemann@xmath109 , e. nurse@xmath184 , t. nyman@xmath128 , b.j . obrien@xmath215 , s.w . oneale@xmath187@xmath164 , d.c . oneil@xmath263 , v. oshea@xmath137 , f.g . oakham@xmath161@xmath178 , h. oberlack@xmath108 , j. ocariz@xmath199 , a. ochi@xmath124 , s. oda@xmath122 , s. odaka@xmath141 , j. odier@xmath157 , h. ogren@xmath230 , a. oh@xmath138 , s.h . oh@xmath160 , c.c . ohm@xmath170 , t. ohshima@xmath290 , h. ohshita@xmath291 , t.k . ohska@xmath141 , t. ohsugi@xmath311 , s. okada@xmath124 , h. okawa@xmath210 , y. okumura@xmath290 , t. okuyama@xmath122 , m. olcese@xmath200 , a.g . olchevski@xmath129 , m. oliveira@xmath143@xmath245 , d. oliveira damazio@xmath105 , e. oliver garcia@xmath145 , d. olivito@xmath135 , a. olszewski@xmath185 , j. olszowska@xmath185 , c. omachi@xmath124 , a. onofre@xmath143@xmath312 , p.u.e . onyisi@xmath148 , c.j . oram@xmath241 , g. ordonez@xmath250 , m.j . oreglia@xmath148 , f. orellana@xmath96 , y. oren@xmath101 , d. orestano@xmath179 , i. orlov@xmath208 , c. oropeza barrera@xmath137 , r.s . orr@xmath183 , e.o . ortega@xmath212 , b. osculati@xmath189 , r. ospanov@xmath135 , c. osuna@xmath95 , g. otero y garzon@xmath279 , j.p ottersbach@xmath213 , m. ouchrif@xmath265 , f. ould - saada@xmath234 , a. ouraou@xmath180 , q. ouyang@xmath182 , m. owen@xmath138 , s. owen@xmath146 , a. oyarzun@xmath229 , o.k . ye@xmath231 , v.e . ozcan@xmath120 , n. ozturk@xmath225 , a. pacheco pages@xmath95 , c. padilla aranda@xmath95 , e. paganis@xmath146 , f. paige@xmath105 , k. pajchel@xmath234 , s. palestini@xmath128 , d. pallin@xmath236 , a. palma@xmath143@xmath144 , j.d . palmer@xmath187 , y.b . pan@xmath168 , e. panagiotopoulou@xmath132 , b. panes@xmath267 , n. panikashvili@xmath165 , s. panitkin@xmath105 , d. pantea@xmath131 , m. panuskova@xmath256 , v. paolone@xmath223 , a. paoloni@xmath119 , a. papadelis@xmath220 , th.d . papadopoulou@xmath132 , a. paramonov@xmath171 , w. park@xmath105@xmath313 , m.a . parker@xmath169 , f. parodi@xmath189 , j.a . parsons@xmath147 , u. parzefall@xmath93 , e. pasqualucci@xmath156 , a. passeri@xmath191 , f. pastore@xmath179 , fr . pastore@xmath128 , g. psztor @xmath96@xmath314 , s. pataraia@xmath168 , n. patel@xmath300 , j.r . pater@xmath138 , s. patricelli@xmath139 , t. pauly@xmath128 , m. pecsy@xmath196 , m.i . pedraza morales@xmath168 , s.v . peleganchuk@xmath208 , h. peng@xmath168 , r. pengo@xmath128 , a. penson@xmath147 , j. penwell@xmath230 , m. perantoni@xmath239 , k. perez@xmath147@xmath305 , t. perez cavalcanti@xmath201 , e. perez codina@xmath95 , m.t . prez garca - esta@xmath145 , v. perez reale@xmath147 , i. peric@xmath133 , l. perini@xmath103 , h. pernegger@xmath128 , r. perrino@xmath246 , p. perrodo@xmath158 , s. persembe@xmath237 , v.d . peshekhonov@xmath129 , o. peters@xmath213 , b.a . petersen@xmath128 , j. petersen@xmath128 , t.c . petersen@xmath218 , e. petit@xmath157 , a. petridis@xmath294 , c. petridou@xmath294 , e. petrolo@xmath156 , f. petrucci@xmath179 , d. petschull@xmath201 , m. petteni@xmath263 , r. pezoa@xmath229 , a. phan@xmath188 , a.w . phillips@xmath169 , p.w . phillips@xmath111 , g. piacquadio@xmath128 , e. piccaro@xmath110 , m. piccinini@xmath153 , a. pickford@xmath137 , s.m . piec@xmath201 , r. piegaia@xmath279 , j.e . pilcher@xmath148 , a.d . pilkington@xmath138 , j. pina@xmath143@xmath144 , m. pinamonti@xmath247 , a. pinder@xmath97 , j.l . pinfold@xmath181 , j. ping@xmath252 , b. pinto@xmath143@xmath144 , o. pirotte@xmath128 , c. pizio@xmath103 , r. placakyte@xmath201 , m. plamondon@xmath172 , w.g . plano@xmath138 , m .- a . pleier@xmath105 , a.v . pleskach@xmath142 , a. poblaguev@xmath105 , s. poddar@xmath149 , f. podlyski@xmath236 , l. poggioli@xmath102 , t. poghosyan@xmath133 , m. pohl@xmath96 , f. polci@xmath127 , g. polesello@xmath207 , a. policicchio@xmath275 , a. polini@xmath206 , j. poll@xmath110 , v. polychronakos@xmath105 , d.m . pomarede@xmath180 , d. pomeroy@xmath112 , k. pomms@xmath128 , l. pontecorvo@xmath156 , b.g . pope@xmath100 , g.a . popeneciu@xmath131 , d.s . popovic@xmath222 , a. poppleton@xmath128 , x. portell bueso@xmath93 , r. porter@xmath210 , c. posch@xmath116 , g.e . pospelov@xmath108 , s. pospisil@xmath174 , i.n . potrap@xmath108 , c.j . potter@xmath195 , c.t . potter@xmath228 , g. poulard@xmath128 , j. poveda@xmath168 , r. prabhu@xmath184 , p. pralavorio@xmath157 , s. prasad@xmath193 , r. pravahan@xmath225 , s. prell@xmath251 , k. pretzl@xmath197 , l. pribyl@xmath128 , d. price@xmath230 , l.e . price@xmath171 , m.j . price@xmath128 , p.m. prichard@xmath136 , d. prieur@xmath223 , m. primavera@xmath246 , k. prokofiev@xmath233 , f. prokoshin@xmath229 , s. protopopescu@xmath105 , j. proudfoot@xmath171 , x. prudent@xmath278 , h. przysiezniak@xmath158 , s. psoroulas@xmath133 , e. ptacek@xmath228 , j. purdham@xmath165 , m. purohit@xmath105@xmath313 , p. puzo@xmath102 , y. pylypchenko@xmath234 , j. qian@xmath165 , z. qian@xmath157 , z. qin@xmath201 , a. quadt@xmath176 , d.r . quarrie@xmath163 , w.b . quayle@xmath168 , f. quinonez@xmath267 , m. raas@xmath250 , v. radescu@xmath315 , b. radics@xmath133 , t. rador@xmath120 , f. ragusa@xmath103 , g. rahal@xmath217 , a.m. rahimi@xmath273 , d. rahm@xmath105 , s. rajagopalan@xmath105 , s. rajek@xmath235 , m. rammensee@xmath93 , m. rammes@xmath232 , m. ramstedt@xmath170 , k. randrianarivony@xmath161 , p.n . ratoff@xmath194 , f. rauscher@xmath109 , e. rauter@xmath108 , m. raymond@xmath128 , a.l . read@xmath234 , d.m . rebuzzi@xmath240 , a. redelbach@xmath274 , g. redlinger@xmath105 , r. reece@xmath135 , k. reeves@xmath118 , a. reichold@xmath213 , e. reinherz - aronis@xmath101 , a. reinsch@xmath228 , i. reisinger@xmath235 , d. reljic@xmath222 , c. rembser@xmath128 , z.l . ren@xmath292 , a. renaud@xmath102 , p. renkel@xmath264 , b. rensch@xmath218 , m. rescigno@xmath156 , s. resconi@xmath130 , b. resende@xmath180 , p. reznicek@xmath109 , r. rezvani@xmath183 , r. richter@xmath108 , e. richter - was@xmath185@xmath316 , m. ridel@xmath199 , s. rieke@xmath115 , m. rijpstra@xmath213 , m. rijssenbeek@xmath117 , a. rimoldi@xmath240 , l. rinaldi@xmath206 , r.r . rios@xmath264 , i. riu@xmath95 , g. rivoltella@xmath103 , f. rizatdinova@xmath99 , e. rizvi@xmath110 , s.h . robertson@xmath249@xmath260 , a. robichaud - veronneau@xmath96 , d. robinson@xmath169 , j.e.m . robinson@xmath184 , m. robinson@xmath228 , a. robson@xmath137 , j.g . rocha de lima@xmath238 , c. roda@xmath214 , d. roda dos santos@xmath128 , s. rodier@xmath192 , d. rodriguez@xmath306 , y. rodriguez garcia@xmath134 , a. roe@xmath176 , s. roe@xmath128 , o. rhne@xmath234 , v. rojo@xmath125 , s. rolli@xmath286 , a. romaniouk@xmath154 , v.m . romanov@xmath129 , g. romeo@xmath279 , d. romero maltrana@xmath267 , l. roos@xmath199 , e. ros@xmath145 , s. rosati@xmath275 , m. rose@xmath126 , g.a . rosenbaum@xmath183 , e.i . rosenberg@xmath251 , p.l . rosendahl@xmath231 , l. rosselet@xmath96 , v. rossetti@xmath95 , e. rossi@xmath139 , l.p . rossi@xmath200 , l. rossi@xmath103 , m. rotaru@xmath131 , i. roth@xmath140 , j. rothberg@xmath275 , i. rottlnder@xmath133 , d. rousseau@xmath102 , c.r . royon@xmath180 , a. rozanov@xmath157 , y. rozen@xmath203 , x. ruan@xmath102 , i. rubinskiy@xmath201 , b. ruckert@xmath109 , n. ruckstuhl@xmath213 , v.i . rud@xmath277 , g. rudolph@xmath270 , f. rhr@xmath254 , f. ruggieri@xmath179 , a. ruiz - martinez@xmath251 , e. rulikowska - zarebska@xmath257 , v. rumiantsev@xmath276@xmath164 , l. rumyantsev@xmath129 , k. runge@xmath93 , o. runolfsson@xmath133 , z. rurikova@xmath93 , n.a . rusakovich@xmath129 , d.r . rust@xmath230 , j.p . rutherfoord@xmath254 , c. ruwiedel@xmath163 , p. ruzicka@xmath256 , y.f . ryabov@xmath271 , v. ryadovikov@xmath142 , p. ryan@xmath100 , m. rybar@xmath262 , g. rybkin@xmath102 , n.c . ryder@xmath97 , s. rzaeva@xmath98 , a.f . saavedra@xmath300 , i. sadeh@xmath101 , h.f - w . sadrozinski@xmath186 , r. sadykov@xmath129 , f. safai tehrani@xmath167 , h. sakamoto@xmath122 , g. salamanna@xmath213 , a. salamon@xmath243 , m. saleem@xmath94 , d. salihagic@xmath108 , a. salnikov@xmath159 , j. salt@xmath145 , b.m . salvachua ferrando@xmath171 , d. salvatore@xmath242 , f. salvatore@xmath195 , a. salvucci@xmath132 , a. salzburger@xmath128 , d. sampsonidis@xmath294 , b.h . samset@xmath234 , h. sandaker@xmath231 , h.g . sander@xmath115 , m.p . sanders@xmath109 , m. sandhoff@xmath190 , p. sandhu@xmath183 , t. sandoval@xmath169 , r. sandstroem@xmath213 , s. sandvoss@xmath190 , d.p.c . sankey@xmath111 , a. sansoni@xmath151 , c. santamarina rios@xmath249 , c. santoni@xmath236 , r. santonico@xmath119 , h. santos@xmath143 , j.g . saraiva@xmath143@xmath144 , t. sarangi@xmath168 , e. sarkisyan - grinbaum@xmath225 , f. sarri@xmath214 , g. sartisohn@xmath190 , o. sasaki@xmath141 , t. sasaki@xmath141 , n. sasao@xmath317 , i. satsounkevitch@xmath219 , g. sauvage@xmath158 , j.b . sauvan@xmath102 , p. savard@xmath183@xmath178 , v. savinov@xmath223 , d.o . savu@xmath128 , p. savva @xmath132 , l. sawyer@xmath105@xmath266 , d.h . saxon@xmath137 , l.p . says@xmath236 , c. sbarra@xmath153 , a. sbrizzi@xmath153 , o. scallon@xmath177 , d.a . scannicchio@xmath210 , j. schaarschmidt@xmath102 , p. schacht@xmath108 , u. schfer@xmath115 , s. schaepe@xmath133 , s. schaetzel@xmath315 , a.c . schaffer@xmath102 , d. schaile@xmath109 , r.d . schamberger@xmath117 , a.g . schamov@xmath208 , v. scharf@xmath149 , v.a . schegelsky@xmath271 , d. scheirich@xmath165 , m.i . scherzer@xmath163 , c. schiavi@xmath189 , j. schieck@xmath109 , m. schioppa@xmath242 , s. schlenker@xmath128 , j.l . schlereth@xmath171 , e. schmidt@xmath93 , m.p . schmidt@xmath107@xmath164 , k. schmieden@xmath133 , c. schmitt@xmath115 , m. schmitz@xmath133 , a. schning@xmath315 , m. schott@xmath128 , d. schouten@xmath263 , j. schovancova@xmath256 , m. schram@xmath249 , c. schroeder@xmath115 , n. schroer@xmath299 , s. schuh@xmath128 , g. schuler@xmath128 , j. schultes@xmath190 , h .- c . schultz - coulon@xmath149 , h. schulz@xmath134 , j.w . schumacher@xmath133 , m. schumacher@xmath93 , b.a . schumm@xmath186 , ph . schune@xmath180 , c. schwanenberger@xmath138 , a. schwartzman@xmath159 , ph . schwemling@xmath199 , r. schwienhorst@xmath100 , r. schwierz@xmath278 , j. schwindling@xmath180 , w.g . scott@xmath111 , j. searcy@xmath228 , e. sedykh@xmath271 , e. segura@xmath95 , s.c . seidel@xmath280 , a. seiden@xmath186 , f. seifert@xmath278 , j.m . seixas@xmath239 , g. sekhniaidze@xmath244 , d.m . seliverstov@xmath271 , b. sellden@xmath220 , g. sellers@xmath136 , m. seman@xmath155 , n. semprini - cesari@xmath153 , c. serfon@xmath109 , l. serin@xmath102 , r. seuster@xmath108 , h. severini@xmath94 , m.e . sevior@xmath188 , a. sfyrla@xmath128 , e. shabalina@xmath176 , m. shamim@xmath228 , l.y . shan@xmath182 , j.t . shank@xmath116 , q.t . shao@xmath188 , m. shapiro@xmath163 , p.b . shatalov@xmath166 , l. shaver@xmath254 , c. shaw@xmath137 , k. shaw@xmath247 , d. sherman@xmath107 , p. sherwood@xmath184 , a. shibata@xmath233 , s. shimizu@xmath128 , m. shimojima@xmath318 , t. shin@xmath106 , a. shmeleva@xmath123 , m.j . shochet@xmath148 , d. short@xmath97 , m.a . shupe@xmath254 , p. sicho@xmath256 , a. sidoti@xmath167 , a. siebel@xmath190 , f. siegert@xmath93 , j. siegrist@xmath163 , dj . sijacki@xmath222 , o. silbert@xmath140 , j. silva@xmath143@xmath144 , y. silver@xmath101 , d. silverstein@xmath159 , s.b . silverstein@xmath220 , v. simak@xmath174 , o. simard@xmath180 , lj . simic@xmath222 , s. simion@xmath102 , b. simmons@xmath184 , m. simonyan@xmath218 , p. sinervo@xmath183 , n.b . sinev@xmath228 , v. sipica@xmath232 , g. siragusa@xmath115 , a.n . sisakyan@xmath129 , s.yu . sivoklokov@xmath277 , j. sjlin@xmath170 , t.b . sjursen@xmath231 , l.a . skinnari@xmath163 , k. skovpen@xmath208 , p. skubic@xmath94 , n. skvorodnev@xmath112 , m. slater@xmath187 , t. slavicek@xmath174 , k. sliwa@xmath286 , t.j . sloan@xmath194 , j. sloper@xmath128 , v. smakhtin@xmath140 , s.yu . smirnov@xmath154 , l.n . smirnova@xmath277 , o. smirnova@xmath121 , b.c . smith@xmath193 , d. smith@xmath159 , k.m . smith@xmath137 , m. smizanska@xmath194 , k. smolek@xmath174 , a.a . snesarev@xmath123 , s.w . snow@xmath138 , j. snow@xmath94 , j. snuverink@xmath213 , s. snyder@xmath105 , m. soares@xmath143 , r. sobie@xmath172@xmath260 , j. sodomka@xmath174 , a. soffer@xmath101 , c.a . solans@xmath145 , m. solar@xmath174 , j. solc@xmath174 , e. soldatov@xmath154 , u. soldevila@xmath145 , e. solfaroli camillocci@xmath167 , a.a . solodkov@xmath142 , o.v . solovyanov@xmath142 , j. sondericker@xmath105 , n. soni@xmath181 , v. sopko@xmath174 , b. sopko@xmath174 , m. sorbi@xmath103 , m. sosebee@xmath225 , a. soukharev@xmath208 , s. spagnolo@xmath216 , f. span@xmath147 , r. spighi@xmath206 , g. spigo@xmath128 , f. spila@xmath167 , e. spiriti@xmath191 , r. spiwoks@xmath128 , m. spousta@xmath262 , t. spreitzer@xmath183 , b. spurlock@xmath225 , r.d . denis@xmath137 , t. stahl@xmath232 , j. stahlman@xmath135 , r. stamen@xmath149 , e. stanecka@xmath128 , r.w . stanek@xmath171 , c. stanescu@xmath191 , s. stapnes@xmath234 , e.a . starchenko@xmath142 , j. stark@xmath127 , p. staroba@xmath256 , p. starovoitov@xmath276 , a. staude@xmath109 , p. stavina@xmath196 , g. stavropoulos@xmath163 , g. steele@xmath137 , p. steinbach@xmath278 , p. steinberg@xmath105 , i. stekl@xmath174 , b. stelzer@xmath263 , h.j . stelzer@xmath201 , o. stelzer - chilton@xmath241 , h. stenzel@xmath173 , k. stevenson@xmath110 , g.a . stewart@xmath137 , j.a . stillings@xmath133 , t. stockmanns@xmath133 , m.c . stockton@xmath128 , k. stoerig@xmath93 , g. stoicea@xmath131 , s. stonjek@xmath108 , p. strachota@xmath262 , a.r . stradling@xmath225 , a. straessner@xmath278 , j. strandberg@xmath165 , s. strandberg@xmath170 , a. strandlie@xmath234 , m. strang@xmath273 , e. strauss@xmath159 , m. strauss@xmath94 , p. strizenec@xmath155 , r. strhmer@xmath274 , d.m . strom@xmath228 , j.a . strong@xmath126@xmath164 , r. stroynowski@xmath264 , j. strube@xmath111 , b. stugu@xmath231 , i. stumer@xmath105@xmath164 , j. stupak@xmath117 , p. sturm@xmath190 , d.a . soh@xmath292@xmath302 , d. su@xmath159 , hs . subramania@xmath181 , y. sugaya@xmath288 , t. sugimoto@xmath290 , c. suhr@xmath238 , k. suita@xmath124 , m. suk@xmath262 , v.v . sulin@xmath123 , s. sultansoy@xmath319 , t. sumida@xmath128 , x. sun@xmath127 , j.e . sundermann@xmath93 , k. suruliz@xmath104 , s. sushkov@xmath95 , g. susinno@xmath242 , m.r . sutton@xmath146 , y. suzuki@xmath141 , yu.m . sviridov@xmath142 , s. swedish@xmath175 , i. sykora@xmath196 , t. sykora@xmath262 , b. szeless@xmath128 , j. snchez@xmath145 , d. ta@xmath213 , k. tackmann@xmath128 , a. taffard@xmath210 , r. tafirout@xmath241 , a. taga@xmath234 , n. taiblum@xmath101 , y. takahashi@xmath290 , h. takai@xmath105 , r. takashima@xmath320 , h. takeda@xmath124 , t. takeshita@xmath291 , m. talby@xmath157 , a. talyshev@xmath208 , m.c . tamsett@xmath105 , j. tanaka@xmath122 , r. tanaka@xmath102 , s. tanaka@xmath321 , s. tanaka@xmath141 , y. tanaka@xmath318 , k. tani@xmath124 , n. tannoury@xmath157 , g.p . tappern@xmath128 , s. tapprogge@xmath115 , d. tardif@xmath183 , s. tarem@xmath203 , f. tarrade@xmath105 , g.f . tartarelli@xmath130 , p. tas@xmath262 , m. tasevsky@xmath256 , e. tassi@xmath242 , m. tatarkhanov@xmath163 , c. taylor@xmath184 , f.e . taylor@xmath322 , g.n . taylor@xmath188 , w. taylor@xmath323 , m. teixeira dias castanheira@xmath110 , p. teixeira - dias@xmath126 , k.k . temming@xmath93 , h. ten kate@xmath128 , p.k . teng@xmath292 , s. terada@xmath141 , k. terashi@xmath122 , j. terron@xmath192 , m. terwort@xmath201@xmath297 , m. testa@xmath151 , r.j . teuscher@xmath183@xmath260 , c.m . tevlin@xmath138 , j. thadome@xmath190 , j. therhaag@xmath133 , t. theveneaux - pelzer@xmath199 , m. thioye@xmath107 , s. thoma@xmath93 , j.p . thomas@xmath187 , e.n . thompson@xmath227 , p.d . thompson@xmath187 , p.d . thompson@xmath183 , a.s . thompson@xmath137 , e. thomson@xmath135 , m. thomson@xmath169 , r.p . thun@xmath165 , t. tic@xmath256 , v.o . tikhomirov@xmath123 , y.a . tikhonov@xmath208 , c.j.w.p . timmermans@xmath250 , p. tipton@xmath107 , f.j . tique aires viegas@xmath128 , s. tisserant@xmath157 , j. tobias@xmath93 , b. toczek@xmath257 , t. todorov@xmath158 , s. todorova - nova@xmath286 , b. toggerson@xmath210 , j. tojo@xmath141 , s. tokr@xmath196 , k. tokunaga@xmath124 , k. tokushuku@xmath141 , k. tollefson@xmath100 , m. tomoto@xmath290 , l. tompkins@xmath163 , k. toms@xmath280 , a. tonazzo@xmath179 , g. tong@xmath182 , a. tonoyan@xmath231 , c. topfel@xmath197 , n.d . topilin@xmath129 , i. torchiani@xmath128 , e. torrence@xmath228 , e. torr pastor@xmath145 , j. toth@xmath157@xmath314 , f. touchard@xmath157 , d.r . tovey@xmath146 , d. traynor@xmath110 , t. trefzger@xmath274 , j. treis@xmath133 , l. tremblet@xmath128 , a. tricoli@xmath128 , i.m . trigger@xmath241 , s. trincaz - duvoid@xmath199 , t.n . trinh@xmath199 , m.f . tripiana@xmath150 , n. triplett@xmath251 , w. trischuk@xmath183 , a. trivedi@xmath105@xmath313 , b. trocm@xmath127 , c. troncon@xmath130 , m. trottier - mcdonald@xmath263 , a. trzupek@xmath185 , c. tsarouchas@xmath128 , j.c - l . tseng@xmath97 , m. tsiakiris@xmath213 , p.v . tsiareshka@xmath219 , d. tsionou@xmath158 , g. tsipolitis@xmath132 , v. tsiskaridze@xmath93 , e.g. tskhadadze@xmath255 , i.i . tsukerman@xmath166 , v. tsulaia@xmath223 , j .- w . tsung@xmath133 , s. tsuno@xmath141 , d. tsybychev@xmath117 , a. tua@xmath146 , j.m . tuggle@xmath148 , m. turala@xmath185 , d. turecek@xmath174 , i. turk cakir@xmath324 , e. turlay@xmath213 , r. turra@xmath103 , p.m. tuts@xmath147 , a. tykhonov@xmath258 , m. tylmad@xmath170 , m. tyndel@xmath111 , d. typaldos@xmath187 , h. tyrvainen@xmath128 , g. tzanakos@xmath152 , k. uchida@xmath133 , i. ueda@xmath122 , r. ueno@xmath161 , m. ugland@xmath231 , m. uhlenbrock@xmath133 , m. uhrmacher@xmath176 , f. ukegawa@xmath289 , g. unal@xmath128 , d.g . underwood@xmath171 , a. undrus@xmath105 , g. unel@xmath210 , y. unno@xmath141 , d. urbaniec@xmath147 , e. urkovsky@xmath101 , p. urrejola@xmath267 , g. usai@xmath225 , m. uslenghi@xmath240 , l. vacavant@xmath157 , v. vacek@xmath174 , b. vachon@xmath249 , s. vahsen@xmath163 , c. valderanis@xmath108 , j. valenta@xmath256 , p. valente@xmath156 , s. valentinetti@xmath153 , s. valkar@xmath262 , e. valladolid gallego@xmath145 , s. vallecorsa@xmath203 , j.a . valls ferrer@xmath145 , h. van der graaf@xmath213 , e. van der kraaij@xmath213 , r. van der leeuw@xmath213 , e. van der poel@xmath213 , d. van der ster@xmath128 , b. van eijk@xmath213 , n. van eldik@xmath227 , p. van gemmeren@xmath171 , z. van kesteren@xmath213 , i. van vulpen@xmath213 , w. vandelli@xmath128 , g. vandoni@xmath128 , a. vaniachine@xmath171 , p. vankov@xmath201 , f. vannucci@xmath199 , f. varela rodriguez@xmath128 , r. vari@xmath156 , e.w . varnes@xmath254 , d. varouchas@xmath163 , a. vartapetian@xmath225 , k.e . varvell@xmath300 , v.i . vassilakopoulos@xmath106 , f. vazeille@xmath236 , g. vegni@xmath103 , j.j . veillet@xmath102 , c. vellidis@xmath152 , f. veloso@xmath143 , r. veness@xmath128 , s. veneziano@xmath156 , a. ventura@xmath216 , d. ventura@xmath275 , m. venturi@xmath93 , n. venturi@xmath197 , v. vercesi@xmath207 , m. verducci@xmath275 , w. verkerke@xmath213 , j.c . vermeulen@xmath213 , a. vest@xmath278 , m.c . vetterli@xmath263@xmath178 , i. vichou@xmath211 , t. vickey@xmath301@xmath325 , g.h.a . viehhauser@xmath97 , s. viel@xmath175 , m. villa@xmath153 , m. villaplana perez@xmath145 , e. vilucchi@xmath151 , m.g . vincter@xmath161 , e. vinek@xmath128 , v.b . vinogradov@xmath129 , m. virchaux@xmath180@xmath164 , s. viret@xmath236 , j. virzi@xmath163 , a. vitale @xmath153 , o. vitells@xmath140 , m. viti@xmath201 , i. vivarelli@xmath93 , f. vives vaque@xmath95 , s. vlachos@xmath132 , m. vlasak@xmath174 , n. vlasov@xmath133 , a. vogel@xmath133 , p. vokac@xmath174 , g. volpi@xmath151 , m. volpi@xmath95 , g. volpini@xmath130 , h. von der schmitt@xmath108 , j. von loeben@xmath108 , h. von radziewski@xmath93 , e. von toerne@xmath133 , v. vorobel@xmath262 , a.p . vorobiev@xmath142 , v. vorwerk@xmath95 , m. vos@xmath145 , r. voss@xmath128 , t.t . voss@xmath190 , j.h . vossebeld@xmath136 , a.s . vovenko@xmath142 , n. vranjes@xmath222 , m. vranjes milosavljevic@xmath222 , v. vrba@xmath256 , m. vreeswijk@xmath213 , t. vu anh@xmath115 , r. vuillermet@xmath128 , i. vukotic@xmath102 , w. wagner@xmath190 , p. wagner@xmath135 , h. wahlen@xmath190 , j. wakabayashi@xmath290 , j. walbersloh@xmath235 , s. walch@xmath165 , j. walder@xmath194 , r. walker@xmath109 , w. walkowiak@xmath232 , r. wall@xmath107 , p. waller@xmath136 , c. wang@xmath160 , h. wang@xmath168 , j. wang@xmath292 , j. wang@xmath272 , j.c . wang@xmath275 , r. wang@xmath280 , s.m . wang@xmath292 , a. warburton@xmath249 , c.p . ward@xmath169 , m. warsinsky@xmath93 , p.m. watkins@xmath187 , a.t . watson@xmath187 , m.f . watson@xmath187 , g. watts@xmath275 , s. watts@xmath138 , a.t . waugh@xmath300 , b.m . waugh@xmath184 , j. weber@xmath235 , m. weber@xmath111 , m.s . weber@xmath197 , p. weber@xmath176 , a.r . weidberg@xmath97 , p. weigell@xmath108 , j. weingarten@xmath176 , c. weiser@xmath93 , h. wellenstein@xmath112 , p.s . wells@xmath128 , m. wen@xmath151 , t. wenaus@xmath105 , s. wendler@xmath223 , z. weng@xmath292@xmath302 , t. wengler@xmath128 , s. wenig@xmath128 , n. wermes@xmath133 , m. werner@xmath93 , p. werner@xmath128 , m. werth@xmath210 , m. wessels@xmath149 , k. whalen@xmath161 , s.j . wheeler - ellis@xmath210 , s.p . whitaker@xmath116 , a. white@xmath225 , m.j . white@xmath188 , s. white@xmath105 , s.r . whitehead@xmath97 , d. whiteson@xmath210 , d. whittington@xmath230 , f. wicek@xmath102 , d. wicke@xmath190 , f.j . wickens@xmath111 , w. wiedenmann@xmath168 , m. wielers@xmath111 , p. wienemann@xmath133 , c. wiglesworth@xmath136 , l.a.m . wiik@xmath93 , p.a . wijeratne@xmath184 , a. wildauer@xmath145 , m.a . wildt@xmath201@xmath297 , i. wilhelm@xmath262 , h.g . wilkens@xmath128 , j.z . will@xmath109 , e. williams@xmath147 , h.h . williams@xmath135 , w. willis@xmath147 , s. willocq@xmath227 , j.a . wilson@xmath187 , m.g . wilson@xmath159 , a. wilson@xmath165 , i. wingerter - seez@xmath158 , s. winkelmann@xmath93 , f. winklmeier@xmath128 , m. wittgen@xmath159 , m.w . wolter@xmath185 , h. wolters@xmath143@xmath245 , g. wooden@xmath97 , b.k . wosiek@xmath185 , j. wotschack@xmath128 , m.j . woudstra@xmath227 , k. wraight@xmath137 , c. wright@xmath137 , b. wrona@xmath136 , s.l . wu@xmath168 , x. wu@xmath96 , y. wu@xmath287 , e. wulf@xmath147 , r. wunstorf@xmath235 , b.m . wynne@xmath215 , l. xaplanteris@xmath132 , s. xella@xmath218 , s. xie@xmath93 , y. xie@xmath182 , c. xu@xmath287 , d. xu@xmath146 , g. xu@xmath182 , b. yabsley@xmath300 , m. yamada@xmath141 , a. yamamoto@xmath141 , k. yamamoto@xmath251 , s. yamamoto@xmath122 , t. yamamura@xmath122 , j. yamaoka@xmath160 , t. yamazaki@xmath122 , y. yamazaki@xmath124 , z. yan@xmath116 , h. yang@xmath165 , u.k . yang@xmath138 , y. yang@xmath230 , y. yang@xmath182 , z. yang@xmath170 , s. yanush@xmath276 , w - m . yao@xmath163 , y. yao@xmath163 , y. yasu@xmath141 , g.v . ybeles smit@xmath212 , j. ye@xmath264 , s. ye@xmath105 , m. yilmaz@xmath326 , r. yoosoofmiya@xmath223 , k. yorita@xmath296 , r. yoshida@xmath171 , c. young@xmath159 , s. youssef@xmath116 , d. yu@xmath105 , j. yu@xmath225 , j. yu@xmath252@xmath327 , l. yuan@xmath182@xmath328 , a. yurkewicz@xmath117 , v.g . zaets @xmath142 , r. zaidan@xmath204 , a.m. zaitsev@xmath142 , z. zajacova@xmath128 , yo.k . zalite @xmath271 , l. zanello@xmath167 , p. zarzhitsky@xmath264 , a. zaytsev@xmath208 , c. zeitnitz@xmath190 , m. zeller@xmath107 , p.f . zema@xmath128 , a. zemla@xmath185 , c. zendler@xmath133 , a.v . zenin@xmath142 , o. zenin@xmath142 , t. eni@xmath196 , z. zenonos@xmath214 , s. zenz@xmath163 , d. zerwas@xmath102 , g. zevi della porta@xmath193 , z. zhan@xmath272 , d. zhang@xmath287 , h. zhang@xmath100 , j. zhang@xmath171 , x. zhang@xmath272 , z. zhang@xmath102 , l. zhao@xmath233 , t. zhao@xmath275 , z. zhao@xmath287 , a. zhemchugov@xmath129 , s. zheng@xmath182 , j. zhong@xmath292@xmath329 , b. zhou@xmath165 , n. zhou@xmath210 , y. zhou@xmath292 , c.g . zhu@xmath272 , h. zhu@xmath201 , y. zhu@xmath168 , x. zhuang@xmath109 , v. zhuravlov@xmath108 , d. zieminska@xmath230 , b. zilka@xmath196 , r. zimmermann@xmath133 , s. zimmermann@xmath133 , s. zimmermann@xmath93 , m. ziolkowski@xmath232 , r. zitoun@xmath158 , l. ivkovi@xmath147 , v.v . zmouchko@xmath142@xmath164 , g. zobernig@xmath168 , a. zoccoli@xmath153 , y. zolnierowski@xmath158 , a. zsenei@xmath128 , m. zur nedden@xmath134 , v. zutshi@xmath238 , l. zwalinski@xmath128 . @xmath330 university at albany , albany ny , united states of america + @xmath331 department of physics , university of alberta , edmonton ab , canada + @xmath332 @xmath333department of physics , ankara university , ankara ; @xmath334department of physics , dumlupinar university , kutahya ; @xmath335department of physics , gazi university , ankara ; @xmath336division of physics , tobb university of economics and technology , ankara ; @xmath337turkish atomic energy authority , ankara , turkey + @xmath338 lapp , cnrs / in2p3 and universit de savoie , annecy - le - vieux , france + @xmath339 high energy physics division , argonne national laboratory , argonne il , united states of america + @xmath340 department of physics , university of arizona , tucson az , united states of america + @xmath341 department of physics , the university of texas at arlington , arlington tx , united states of america + @xmath342 physics department , university of athens , athens , greece + @xmath343 physics department , national technical university of athens , zografou , greece + @xmath344 institute of physics , azerbaijan academy of sciences , baku , azerbaijan + @xmath345 institut de fsica daltes energies and universitat autnoma de barcelona and icrea , barcelona , spain + @xmath346 @xmath333institute of physics , university of belgrade , belgrade ; @xmath334vinca institute of nuclear sciences , belgrade , serbia + @xmath347 department for physics and technology , university of bergen , bergen , norway + @xmath348 physics division , lawrence berkeley national laboratory and university of california , berkeley ca , united states of america + @xmath349 department of physics , humboldt university , berlin , germany + @xmath350 albert einstein center for fundamental physics and laboratory for high energy physics , university of bern , bern , switzerland + @xmath351 school of physics and astronomy , university of birmingham , birmingham , united kingdom + @xmath352 @xmath333department of physics , bogazici university , istanbul ; @xmath334division of physics , dogus university , istanbul ; @xmath335department of physics engineering , gaziantep university , gaziantep ; @xmath336department of physics , istanbul technical university , istanbul , turkey + @xmath353 @xmath333infn sezione di bologna ; @xmath334dipartimento di fisica , universit di bologna , bologna , italy + @xmath354 physikalisches institut , university of bonn , bonn , germany + @xmath355 department of physics , boston university , boston ma , united states of america + @xmath356 department of physics , brandeis university , waltham ma , united states of america + @xmath357 @xmath333universidade federal do rio de janeiro coppe / ee / if , rio de janeiro ; @xmath334instituto de fisica , universidade de sao paulo , sao paulo , brazil + @xmath358 physics department , brookhaven national laboratory , upton ny , united states of america + @xmath359 @xmath333national institute of physics and nuclear engineering , bucharest ; @xmath334university politehnica bucharest , bucharest ; @xmath335west university in timisoara , timisoara , romania + @xmath360 departamento de fsica , universidad de buenos aires , buenos aires , argentina + @xmath361 cavendish laboratory , university of cambridge , cambridge , united kingdom + @xmath362 department of physics , carleton university , ottawa on , canada + @xmath363 cern , geneva , switzerland + @xmath364 enrico fermi institute , university of chicago , chicago il , united states of america + @xmath365 @xmath333departamento de fisica , pontificia universidad catlica de chile , santiago ; @xmath334departamento de fsica , universidad tcnica federico santa mara , valparaso , chile + @xmath366 @xmath333institute of high energy physics , chinese academy of sciences , beijing ; @xmath334department of modern physics , university of science and technology of china , anhui ; @xmath335department of physics , nanjing university , jiangsu ; @xmath336high energy physics group , shandong university , shandong , china + @xmath367 laboratoire de physique corpusculaire , clermont universit and universit blaise pascal and cnrs / in2p3 , aubiere cedex , france + @xmath368 nevis laboratory , columbia university , irvington ny , united states of america + @xmath369 niels bohr institute , university of copenhagen , kobenhavn , denmark + @xmath370 @xmath333infn gruppo collegato di cosenza ; @xmath334dipartimento di fisica , universit della calabria , arcavata di rende , italy + @xmath371 faculty of physics and applied computer science , agh - university of science and technology , krakow , poland + @xmath372 the henryk niewodniczanski institute of nuclear physics , polish academy of sciences , krakow , poland + @xmath373 physics department , southern methodist university , dallas tx , united states of america + @xmath374 physics department , university of texas at dallas , richardson tx , united states of america + @xmath375 desy , hamburg and zeuthen , germany + @xmath376 institut fr experimentelle physik iv , technische universitt dortmund , dortmund , germany + @xmath377 institut fr kern- und teilchenphysik , technical university dresden , dresden , germany + @xmath378 department of physics , duke university , durham nc , united states of america + @xmath379 supa - school of physics and astronomy , university of edinburgh , edinburgh , united kingdom + @xmath380 fachhochschule wiener neustadt , wiener neustadt , austria + @xmath381 infn laboratori nazionali di frascati , frascati , italy + @xmath382 fakultt fr mathematik und physik , albert - ludwigs - universitt , freiburg i.br . , germany + @xmath383 section de physique , universit de genve , geneva , switzerland + @xmath384 @xmath333infn sezione di genova ; @xmath334dipartimento di fisica , universit di genova , genova , italy + @xmath385 institute of physics and hep institute , georgian academy of sciences and tbilisi state university , tbilisi , georgia + @xmath386 ii physikalisches institut , justus - liebig - universitt giessen , giessen , germany + @xmath387 supa - school of physics and astronomy , university of glasgow , glasgow , united kingdom + @xmath388 ii physikalisches georg - august - universitt , gttingen , germany + @xmath389 laboratoire de physique subatomique et de cosmologie , universit joseph fourier and cnrs / in2p3 and institut national polytechnique de grenoble , grenoble , france + @xmath390 department of physics , hampton university , hampton va , united states of america + @xmath391 laboratory for particle physics and cosmology , harvard university , cambridge ma , united states of america + @xmath392 @xmath333kirchhoff - institut fr physik , ruprecht - karls - universitt heidelberg , heidelberg ; @xmath334physikalisches institut , ruprecht - karls - universitt heidelberg , heidelberg ; @xmath335ziti institut fr technische informatik , ruprecht - karls - universitt heidelberg , mannheim , germany + @xmath393 faculty of science , hiroshima university , hiroshima , japan + @xmath394 faculty of applied information science , hiroshima institute of technology , hiroshima , japan + @xmath395 department of physics , indiana university , bloomington in , united states of america + @xmath396 institut fr astro- und teilchenphysik , leopold - franzens - universitt , innsbruck , austria + @xmath397 university of iowa , iowa city ia , united states of america + @xmath398 department of physics and astronomy , iowa state university , ames ia , united states of america + @xmath399 joint institute for nuclear research , jinr dubna , dubna , russia + @xmath400 kek , high energy accelerator research organization , tsukuba , japan + @xmath401 graduate school of science , kobe university , kobe , japan + @xmath402 faculty of science , kyoto university , kyoto , japan + @xmath403 kyoto university of education , kyoto , japan + @xmath404 instituto de fsica la plata , universidad nacional de la plata and conicet , la plata , argentina + @xmath405 physics department , lancaster university , lancaster , united kingdom + @xmath406 @xmath333infn sezione di lecce ; @xmath334dipartimento di fisica , universit del salento , lecce , italy + @xmath407 oliver lodge laboratory , university of liverpool , liverpool , united kingdom + @xmath408 department of physics , joef stefan institute and university of ljubljana , ljubljana , slovenia + @xmath409 department of physics , queen mary university of london , london , united kingdom + @xmath410 department of physics , royal holloway university of london , surrey , united kingdom + @xmath411 department of physics and astronomy , university college london , london , united kingdom + @xmath412 laboratoire de physique nuclaire et de hautes energies , upmc and universit paris - diderot and cnrs / in2p3 , paris , france + @xmath413 fysiska institutionen , lunds universitet , lund , sweden + @xmath414 departamento de fisica teorica c-15 , universidad autonoma de madrid , madrid , spain + @xmath415 institut fr physik , universitt mainz , mainz , germany + @xmath416 school of physics and astronomy , university of manchester , manchester , united kingdom + @xmath417 cppm , aix - marseille universit and cnrs / in2p3 , marseille , france + @xmath418 department of physics , university of massachusetts , amherst ma , united states of america + @xmath419 department of physics , mcgill university , montreal qc , canada + @xmath420 school of physics , university of melbourne , victoria , australia + @xmath421 department of physics , the university of michigan , ann arbor mi , united states of america + @xmath422 department of physics and astronomy , michigan state university , east lansing mi , united states of america + @xmath423 @xmath333infn sezione di milano ; @xmath334dipartimento di fisica , universit di milano , milano , italy + @xmath424 b.i . stepanov institute of physics , national academy of sciences of belarus , minsk , republic of belarus + @xmath425 national scientific and educational centre for particle and high energy physics , minsk , republic of belarus + @xmath426 department of physics , massachusetts institute of technology , cambridge ma , united states of america + @xmath427 group of particle physics , university of montreal , montreal qc , canada + @xmath428 p.n . lebedev institute of physics , academy of sciences , moscow , russia + @xmath429 institute for theoretical and experimental physics ( itep ) , moscow , russia + @xmath430 moscow engineering and physics institute ( mephi ) , moscow , russia + @xmath431 skobeltsyn institute of nuclear physics , lomonosov moscow state university , moscow , russia + @xmath432 fakultt fr physik , ludwig - maximilians - universitt mnchen , mnchen , germany + @xmath433 max - planck - institut fr physik ( werner - heisenberg - institut ) , mnchen , germany + @xmath434 nagasaki institute of applied science , nagasaki , japan + @xmath435 graduate school of science , nagoya university , nagoya , japan + @xmath436 @xmath333infn sezione di napoli ; @xmath334dipartimento di scienze fisiche , universit di napoli , napoli , italy + @xmath437 department of physics and astronomy , university of new mexico , albuquerque nm , united states of america + @xmath438 institute for mathematics , astrophysics and particle physics , radboud university nijmegen / nikhef , nijmegen , netherlands + @xmath439 nikhef national institute for subatomic physics and university of amsterdam , amsterdam , netherlands + @xmath440 department of physics , northern illinois university , dekalb il , united states of america + @xmath441 budker institute of nuclear physics ( binp ) , novosibirsk , russia + @xmath442 department of physics , new york university , new york ny , united states of america + @xmath443 ohio state university , columbus oh , united states of america + @xmath444 faculty of science , okayama university , okayama , japan + @xmath445 homer l. dodge department of physics and astronomy , university of oklahoma , norman ok , united states of america + @xmath446 department of physics , oklahoma state university , stillwater ok , united states of america + @xmath447 palack university , rcptm , olomouc , czech republic + @xmath448 center for high energy physics , university of oregon , eugene or , united states of america + @xmath449 lal , univ . paris - sud and cnrs / in2p3 , orsay , france + @xmath450 graduate school of science , osaka university , osaka , japan + @xmath451 department of physics , university of oslo , oslo , norway + @xmath452 department of physics , oxford university , oxford , united kingdom + @xmath453 @xmath333infn sezione di pavia ; @xmath334dipartimento di fisica nucleare e teorica , universit di pavia , pavia , italy + @xmath454 department of physics , university of pennsylvania , philadelphia pa , united states of america + @xmath455 petersburg nuclear physics institute , gatchina , russia + @xmath456 @xmath333infn sezione di pisa ; @xmath334dipartimento di fisica e. fermi , universit di pisa , pisa , italy + @xmath457 department of physics and astronomy , university of pittsburgh , pittsburgh pa , united states of america + @xmath458 @xmath333laboratorio de instrumentacao e fisica experimental de particulas - lip , lisboa , portugal ; @xmath334departamento de fisica teorica y del cosmos and cafpe , universidad de granada , granada , spain + @xmath459 institute of physics , academy of sciences of the czech republic , praha , czech republic + @xmath460 faculty of mathematics and physics , charles university in prague , praha , czech republic + @xmath461 czech technical university in prague , praha , czech republic + @xmath462 state research center institute for high energy physics , protvino , russia + @xmath463 particle physics department , rutherford appleton laboratory , didcot , united kingdom + @xmath464 physics department , university of regina , regina sk , canada + @xmath465 ritsumeikan university , kusatsu , shiga , japan + @xmath466 @xmath333infn sezione di roma i ; @xmath334dipartimento di fisica , universit la sapienza , roma , italy + @xmath467 @xmath333infn sezione di roma tor vergata ; @xmath334dipartimento di fisica , universit di roma tor vergata , roma , italy + @xmath468 @xmath333infn sezione di roma tre ; @xmath334dipartimento di fisica , universit roma tre , roma , italy + @xmath469 @xmath333facult des sciences ain chock , rseau universitaire de physique des hautes energies - universit hassan ii , casablanca ; @xmath334centre national de lenergie des sciences techniques nucleaires , rabat ; @xmath335universit cadi ayyad , facult des sciences semlalia dpartement de physique , b.p . 2390 marrakech 40000 ; @xmath336facult des sciences , universit mohamed premier and lptpm , oujda ; @xmath337facult des sciences , universit mohammed v , rabat , morocco + @xmath470 dsm / irfu ( institut de recherches sur les lois fondamentales de lunivers ) , cea saclay ( commissariat a lenergie atomique ) , gif - sur - yvette , france + @xmath471 santa cruz institute for particle physics , university of california santa cruz , santa cruz ca , united states of america + @xmath472 department of physics , university of washington , seattle wa , united states of america + @xmath473 department of physics and astronomy , university of sheffield , sheffield , united kingdom + @xmath474 department of physics , shinshu university , nagano , japan + @xmath475 fachbereich physik , universitt siegen , siegen , germany + @xmath476 department of physics , simon fraser university , burnaby bc , canada + @xmath477 slac national accelerator laboratory , stanford ca , united states of america + @xmath478 @xmath333faculty of mathematics , physics & informatics , comenius university , bratislava ; @xmath334department of subnuclear physics , institute of experimental physics of the slovak academy of sciences , kosice , slovak republic + @xmath479 @xmath333department of physics , university of johannesburg , johannesburg ; @xmath334school of physics , university of the witwatersrand , johannesburg , south africa + @xmath480 @xmath333department of physics , stockholm university ; @xmath334the oskar klein centre , stockholm , sweden + @xmath481 physics department , royal institute of technology , stockholm , sweden + @xmath482 department of physics and astronomy , stony brook university , stony brook ny , united states of america + @xmath483 department of physics and astronomy , university of sussex , brighton , united kingdom + @xmath484 school of physics , university of sydney , sydney , australia + @xmath485 institute of physics , academia sinica , taipei , taiwan + @xmath486 department of physics , technion : israel inst . of technology , haifa , israel + @xmath487 raymond and beverly sackler school of physics and astronomy , tel aviv university , tel aviv , israel + @xmath488 department of physics , aristotle university of thessaloniki , thessaloniki , greece + @xmath489 international center for elementary particle physics and department of physics , the university of tokyo , tokyo , japan + @xmath490 graduate school of science and technology , tokyo metropolitan university , tokyo , japan + @xmath491 department of physics , tokyo institute of technology , tokyo , japan + @xmath492 department of physics , university of toronto , toronto on , canada + @xmath493 @xmath333triumf , vancouver bc ; @xmath334department of physics and astronomy , york university , toronto on , canada + @xmath494 institute of pure and applied sciences , university of tsukuba , ibaraki , japan + @xmath495 science and technology center , tufts university , medford ma , united states of america + @xmath496 centro de investigaciones , universidad antonio narino , bogota , colombia + @xmath497 department of physics and astronomy , university of california irvine , irvine ca , united states of america + @xmath498 @xmath333infn gruppo collegato di udine ; @xmath334ictp , trieste ; @xmath335dipartimento di fisica , universit di udine , udine , italy + @xmath499 department of physics , university of illinois , urbana il , united states of america + @xmath500 department of physics and astronomy , university of uppsala , uppsala , sweden + @xmath501 instituto de fsica corpuscular ( ific ) and departamento de fsica atmica , molecular y nuclear and departamento de ingenier electrnica and instituto de microelectrnica de barcelona ( imb - cnm ) , university of valencia and csic , valencia , spain + @xmath502 department of physics , university of british columbia , vancouver bc , canada + @xmath503 department of physics and astronomy , university of victoria , victoria bc , canada + @xmath504 waseda university , tokyo , japan + @xmath505 department of particle physics , the weizmann institute of science , rehovot , israel + @xmath506 department of physics , university of wisconsin , madison wi , united states of america + @xmath507 fakultt fr physik und astronomie , julius - maximilians - universitt , wrzburg , germany + @xmath508 fachbereich c physik , bergische universitt wuppertal , wuppertal , germany + @xmath509 department of physics , yale university , new haven ct , united states of america + @xmath510 yerevan physics institute , yerevan , armenia + @xmath511 domaine scientifique de la doua , centre de calcul cnrs / in2p3 , villeurbanne cedex , france + @xmath512 also at laboratorio de instrumentacao e fisica experimental de particulas - lip , lisboa , portugal + @xmath513 also at faculdade de ciencias and cfnul , universidade de lisboa , lisboa , portugal + @xmath514 also at cppm , aix - marseille universit and cnrs / in2p3 , marseille , france + @xmath515 also at triumf , vancouver bc , canada + @xmath516 also at department of physics , california state university , fresno ca , united states of america + @xmath517 also at faculty of physics and applied computer science , agh - university of science and technology , krakow , poland + @xmath518 also at department of physics , university of coimbra , coimbra , portugal + @xmath519 also at universit di napoli parthenope , napoli , italy + @xmath520 also at institute of particle physics ( ipp ) , canada + @xmath521 also at louisiana tech university , ruston la , united states of america + @xmath522 also at group of particle physics , university of montreal , montreal qc , canada + @xmath523 also at institute of physics , azerbaijan academy of sciences , baku , azerbaijan + @xmath524 also at institut fr experimentalphysik , universitt hamburg , hamburg , germany + @xmath525 also at manhattan college , new york ny , united states of america + @xmath526 also at school of physics and engineering , sun yat - sen university , guanzhou , china + @xmath527 also at academia sinica grid computing , institute of physics , academia sinica , taipei , taiwan + @xmath528 also at high energy physics group , shandong university , shandong , china + @xmath529 also at california institute of technology , pasadena ca , united states of america + @xmath530 also at particle physics department , rutherford appleton laboratory , didcot , united kingdom + @xmath531 also at section de physique , universit de genve , geneva , switzerland + @xmath532 also at departamento de fisica , universidade de minho , braga , portugal + @xmath533 also at department of physics and astronomy , university of south carolina , columbia sc , united states of america + @xmath534 also at kfki research institute for particle and nuclear physics , budapest , hungary + @xmath535 also at institute of physics , jagiellonian university , krakow , poland + @xmath536 also at department of physics , oxford university , oxford , united kingdom + @xmath537 also at dsm / irfu ( institut de recherches sur les lois fondamentales de lunivers ) , cea saclay ( commissariat a lenergie atomique ) , gif - sur - yvette , france + @xmath538 also at laboratoire de physique nuclaire et de hautes energies , upmc and universit paris - diderot and cnrs / in2p3 , paris , france + @xmath539 also at department of physics , nanjing university , jiangsu , china + @xmath540 deceased Abstract:

Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.

Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered . Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video . Paper: identifying members of known moving groups ( mg ) or open clusters can provide an important constraint on their age and composition . low - mass stars and brown dwarfs ( bds ) members of known mgs or open clusters can provide important feedback to atmospheric and evolutionary models of such objects at young ages , which currently await good calibration from constraints on age and composition . therefore , there exists an imperative to compile a sample of mg members in this mass range that can be used as anchor points or test - beds for these models . in this paper we present the last in a series of results of a major survey of ultra - cool dwarfs ( ucds ; objects with a spectral classification of m7 or later corresponding to teff@xmath12500 k ) , in young moving groups which began with the results presented in clarke et al . ( 2010 ) , hereafter paper i , and glvez - ortiz et al . ( 2010 ) , hereafter paper ii . we focus here on the study of age - sensitive spectroscopic signatures such as gravity sensitive features ( e.g. gorlova et al . 2003 ; mcgovern et al . 2004 ) , h@xmath0 emission ( e.g. west et al . 2004 , 2008 , 2011 ) and the presence of li i 6708 in a sample of objects previously classified as members of a mg based on kinematic or astrometric criteria . despite the recent disagreement about the origin of moving groups ( famaey et al . 2007 , 2008 ; antoja et al . 2008 ; klement et al . 2008 ; francis & anderson 2009 ; zhao et al . 2009 ; lpez - santiago et al . 2009 ; bovy & hogg 2010 ; murgas et al . 2013 ) , and as we discussed in paper ii , we are assuming the classical concept : a moving group is a young stellar population that shares a common space motion ( e.g. pinfield et al . 2006 ) whose members have a common origin , and therefore , age and composition . we focused our studies on well - documented groups : the hyades supercluster ( hy ; 600 myr ) , the ursa major group ( sirius supercluster ) ( si ; 300 myr ) , ic 2391 supercluster ( ic ; 35 - 55 myr ) , the castor moving group ( ca ; 200 myr ) , and the local association ( 20 - 150 myr ) or pleiades ( pl ) moving group ( see paper i and ii for details of mg properties and references thereof ) . many efforts have been made to obtain accurate models to understand the cool and complex atmospheres of low mass stellar and substellar objects ( e.g. kirkpatrick et al . 1993 ; rajpurohit et al . 2011 ; reyle et al . 2011 ; rajpurohit et al . but the models still show discrepancies , for example in the strength of some absorption bands : discrepancies likely due to inaccurate atomic parameters and/or missing molecular opacities . also , dust formation and its behaviour with temperature changes spectral characteristics in many ways . models that describe very low - mass stars ( vlms ) and bd atmospheres can not hope to be in agreement with observations without the inclusion of dust . the onset of iron and silicates dust grain formation suspended in the photospheres of late - type m dwarfs through the l dwarf spectral sub - types is accompanied by spectral reddening , especially in near - ir ( based upon the size , quantity and distribution of this dust ) . the t dwarf spectral sub - type sequence demonstrates a reversal to bluer colours due to the dust settling below the photosphere , thus reducing the reddening . consequently , atmospheric models that describe dwarf objects with t@xmath2 @xmath3 2800 k should include treatment for the effects of atmospheric dust evolution . up to date , there are several families of stellar model atmospheres of very low mass stars . these models are still incomplete or approximate in some physical properties ( opacities , oscillator strengths for some lines and molecular bands , etc ) , showing few or considerable discrepancies depending on the atmospheric regions , temperatures , etc , and there are also non covered areas or `` gaps '' . a comprehensive study of models tested by observations is needed to fully understand this cool atmospheres . since bds are objects occupying an intermediate position between stars and giant planets , studying their atmospheres can help us to better understand the processes in giant exo - planet atmospheres . the determination of the physical properties of vlms and bds is also important for understanding a broad range of topics including stellar and planetary formation , circumstellar disks , dust formation in cool atmospheres , and the initial mass function . by comparing high and low resolution optical spectra of our 25 low - mass stars and bd kinematic mg candidates with a grid of atmospheric models , we can obtain effective temperature and surface gravity estimates . in section 2 we describe the sample characteristics and selection criteria , while in section 3 we present details of our observations and data reduction techniques . in section 4 we explain the model atmosphere fitting process , and in section 5 we describe the age indicators and the analysis used to assess the sample memberships . finally , in section 6 we present a brief discussion and summary of our results . we present here the study of two different samples . we used photometric and astrometric criteria to combine an extended version of the liverpool - edinburgh high proper motion survey ( elehpm ; pokorny , jones & hambly 2003 ; pokorny et al . 2004 ) and southern infrared proper motion survey ( sips ; deacon et al . 2005 ; deacon & hambly 2007 ) with the two micron all sky survey ( 2mass ) , and applied colour cuts of @xmath4-@[email protected] and @xmath7-@[email protected] to select objects with spectral type predominantly later than m6v . to these we applied proper motion restriction , @xmath8@xmath9 ( @xmath10 is proper motion and @xmath11 is the proper motion one sigma uncertainty ) to ensure a 4-@xmath12 level of proper motion accuracy before searching for stars with proper motions consistent with any of the mgs . of the 817 red object catalogue we obtained by using both astrometric and photometric criteria , we concluded that 132 of these objects were possible members of one or more of the five mgs in the study ( see paper i for details ) . from this sample we then obtained high resolution spectra of 68 objects with spectral types ranging m4.5-l1 . using these high resolution spectra we derived galactic space - velocity components and , applied a simple kinematic criterion . we found that 49 targets have kinematics consistent with the young disk population ( yd ; see e.g. eggen 1984a , b , 1989 ) and that 36 of them possibly belong to one of the five moving groups in this study . we also measured ( where possible ) projected rotational velocities and used the rotation rate as a supporting criterion of youth in confirming the kinematic members . we found that 31 young disk candidates have moderately high rotational velocities which also suggest youth and that 12 others have significantly high rotations to consider for further investigation as possible young stars ( see paper ii for details ) . we present here high resolution follow - up observations for the 13 brightest stars in this sample , that we took in order to use other spectroscopic age criteria to confirm kinematic membership . in table [ tab : samplea ] we give the name , coordinates , 2mass @xmath4 magnitude and the mg candidature assigned from the kinematic study and the rotational velocities obtained in paper ii . our second sample consists of objects selected from the catalogue of folkes et al . ( 2012 ) , and the reader is refered to this publication for full details of the selection method used in the creation of the catalogue . these authors present an ucd catalogue containing 245 objects with spectral types of late - m through to the l t transition from low southern galactic latitudes , in an area covering 5042 sq.degs within 220@xmath13 @xmath3 l @xmath3 260@xmath13 and 0@xmath13 @xmath3 l @xmath3 60@xmath13 for @xmath14b@xmath14@xmath315@xmath13 ) , identified as part of a deep search using 2mass near - ir and supercosmos optical photometry selection criteria as well as reduced proper motion constraints . * photometry : using an optimal set of optical / near - ir selection criteria for the ( @xmath4-@xmath15)/(@xmath4-@xmath16 ) two - colour plane along with optical / near - ir colours of ( @xmath17-@xmath16 ) , ( @xmath18-@xmath16 ) , ( @xmath19-@xmath16 ) and the optical colour of @xmath20r@xmath21i@xmath22 , with @xmath4@xmath15@xmath16 from 2mass , we obtained a sample of objects in the spectral range of @xmath23m8v to @xmath23l9 . the selection method also included an @xmath24 and @xmath25 photometric surface gravity test with additional photometric constraints . see figures 1 , 2 and 3 , and section 2 of folkes et al . ( 2012 ) for details . * astrometry : to eliminate bright distant contaminants , which one would expect to display small proper motions , a reduced proper - motion diagram was used to segregate giant from dwarfs ( e.g. luyten 1978 ) . in this case we used a diagram of reduced proper motion in 2mass @xmath16-band plotted against ( @xmath26-@xmath16 ) colour . see fig . 6 and section 2.5 of folkes et al . ( 2012 ) for details . to find possible mg members from this ucd sample , folkes ( 2009 ) applied the astrometric and photometric test described in sections 3.2 and 3.3 of paper i ( used in the selection process of sample a. ) spectral types and photometric distances were derived from the ( @xmath27-@xmath4 ) colour using the @xmath28/(@xmath29-@xmath4 ) , and @xmath28/spt relations of dahn et al . ( 2002 ) . from these photometric and astrometric criteria folkes ( 2009 ) identified 23 objects , with spectral types ranging from m3 to l0 as possible moving group members , from which we could observe 12 that form sample b. here we obtain spectral classification and confirm ( or otherwise ) the youth of these candidates , through low resolution spectroscopy and by studying age - sensitive spectral features . in table [ tab : sampleb ] we give the name , coordinates , 2mass @xmath4 magnitude and the mg candidature assignation . to improve the previous photometric spectral type determination from folkes ( 2009 ) , we calculated a variety of different spectroscopic indices : pc3 , tio1+tio2 and vo1+vo2 from martn et al . ( 1999 ) ; the vo index from kirkpatrick et al . ( 1995 ) ; vo - a and tio5 from cruz & reid ( 2002 ) . since the tio1+tio2 and vo1+vo2 indices can imply two different spectral types ( see fig . 9 of martn et al . 1999 ) , we only considered them if they were consistent with the spectral types obtained by the other indices . from these a mean spectral type was calculated . some objects show considerable discrepancies between spectral type derived from photometry and that from spectroscopic indices . that is , with the exception of two objects ( 2mass1756 - 4518 and 2mass1909 - 1937 ) with very similar photometric and spectroscopic spectral classification . this difference is marked by the systematic assignment of a later spectral type by the photometric method . also the difference between the two classifications appears greater for redder objects . even with care during selection , the objects of sample b are situated in highly populated and reddened areas within the photometric selection planes , which could have produced these differences . also , the possible presence of dust in these atmospheres could account for redder colours , therefore suggesting later spectral types . we used the spectral types derived from spectroscopy for all calculations . for this paper we analysed optical high resolution echelle spectra of 13 objects ( sample a ; table [ tab : samplea ] ) and low resolution long slit spectra of 12 objects ( sample b ; table [ tab : sampleb ] ) . the data were obtained during four observing runs detailed in table [ tab : obs ] . both sets of high and low resolution spectra were extracted using the standard reduction procedures in the iraf twodspec and echelle packages respectively : bias subtraction , flat - field division , extraction of the spectra , telluric correction as well as wavelength and flux calibration . we obtained the solution for the wavelength calibration by taking spectra of a th - ar lamp . the average signal - to - noise ( s / n ) of the data , measured as the square root of the signal at @xmath30 8100 , is @xmath3030 for uves data ( except for 2mass2039 - 1126 that has s / n of @xmath3015 ) and @xmath30200 for both runs of imacs data . figure [ fig : todashl ] shows high resolution spectra of sample a on the left and low resolution spectra of sample b on the right , ordered by spectral type classification . well studied late - type objects with known spectral type were observed at the same time as the targets to be used as reference ( m9 lp944 - 20 ; m4 gl876 ; and m6 gl 406 ) and are also included in the figure for comparison . to determine spectral characteristics of the targets ( t@xmath2 , @xmath31 , etc ) , to aid us in age determination , we compared a grid of generated synthetic spectra with the observations . according to current concepts , dust plays an important role in the formation of late m dwarf spectra ( tsuji et al . 1996 ; hauschildt & allard 1992 ) . although there is no unified opinion about temperature range where dust should be considered , the temperatures of transition between dust - free and dusty models range from @xmath32@xmath12600 ( allard et al . 2011 ) to @xmath32@xmath13000 k ( jones & tsuji 1997 ) . therefore , synthetic spectra were computed for dust - free nextgen atmospheric models and for semi - empirical models ( i.e. modified nextgen models ) in the wavelength range 6500 - 9000 . the dust effects " are included in semi - empirical models for m3-m8 stars . synthetic spectra based on dusty , cond and corresponding semi - empirical models were calculated for m7-l0 stars . synthetic spectra were computed for nextgen atmospheric models ( hauschildt & allard 1992 ) by the wita6 program ( pavlenko et al . 1997 ; 2007a ) . the calculations were made under the assumption of local thermodynamic equilibrium ( lte ) , hydro - static equilibrium , in the absence of sources and sinks of energy , for a one - dimensional model atmosphere . we used the atomic line list from the vald database ( kupka et al . 1999 ) and the line list of titanium oxide ( tio ) from plez ( 1998 ) to produce the synthetic spectra . vanadium oxide ( vo ) band opacities were computed in the framework of the jola approximation ( see lyubchik & pavlenko 2000 ) . synthetic spectra were calculated for a grid of models having t@xmath2=2600@xmath213400 k with @xmath33 k step , surface gravities of @[email protected] with 0.5 step and metallicities of @xmath34$]=0.0 , -0.5 and -1.0 dex . solar abundances were taken from anders & grevesse ( 1989 ) . the artificial rotational - broadening of spectral lines was implemented following the methodology of gray ( 2005 ) using the rotational velocity of the objects obtained in paper ii . we carried out a few numerical experiments to investigate the effect of microturbulence velocity on the spectra . the study shows that the differences in synthetic spectra associated with @xmath35 in the 1.0 - 5.0 km s@xmath36 range are negligible . thus all theoretical spectra were computed for a microturbulence velocity @xmath35 = 3.0 km s@xmath36 . we used the semi - empirical atmospheric models described in pavlenko et al . ( 2007a ) to include the effects of dust formation . the semi - empirical models were obtained by modifying nextgen , dusty and cond models . the dust opacity originates in the shell - like structures lying above the photosphere ( pavlenko et al . 2007a ) and we expect the influence of dust in a spectrum to be more prevalent in the shortest wavelength spectral region . we assumed that dust clouds are located in the upper most layers of stellar atmosphere and do not affect the distribution of temperatures and pressures . dusty effects were treated in two ways : ( 1 ) decreasing molecular abundance in the gas due to molecular condensation of dust particles and ( 2 ) radiation scattering in the dust clouds . the decrease in the concentration of tio and vo molecules was modelled by two parameters : ( 1 ) the number of layers in the above model for which there is no absorption of tio ( i.e. , all titanium oxide condenses on dust particles ) and ( 2 ) the coefficient of tio molecular density reduction for all other model layers . radiation scattering in the dust clouds was also modelled by two parameters : 1 ) the optical thickness of the dust cloud and 2 ) the location of maximum opacity as a result of these clouds . this method is described in pavlenko et al . ( 2007a ) and kuznetsov et al . ( 2012 ) . the theoretical spectra were computed using a semi - empirical atmospheric model for a grid with effective temperatures of t@xmath2=2600@xmath213000 k ( based on nexgen models ) and @xmath32=2000@xmath212600 k ( based on dusty and cond models ) with a step of 100 k , surface gravities of @[email protected] with a step of 0.5 , and solar ( anders & grevesse 1989 ) metallicity . these models were calculated for the same rotational and microturbulence velocity as for the nextgen models . we are thus able to compare the observed high and low resolution spectra with synthetic spectra assuming both the presence and the absence of dust . the @xmath37-function analysis described in pavlenko et al . ( 2007a ) was used to determine the best fit for each grid of the model independently , @xmath38 where @xmath39 is a normalization parameter , @xmath40 is the synthetic flux and @xmath41 is the observed flux . the minimum value of @xmath37-function corresponds to the best fit . the @xmath37-function is integrated in the 6900 - 7200 , 8100 - 8400 and 7660.8 - 7734 , 8160 - 8220 wavelength ranges for low and high resolution spectra respectively . the use of these regions allowed us to analyze the tio band at @xmath237100 and na i ( 8183 , 8199 ) doublet in low resolution spectra , the k i ( 7665 and 7669 ) resonance doublet and na i ( 8183 , 8199 ) subordinate doublet in high resolution spectra . analysis of na i and k i lines is significant because their profile is sensitive to t@xmath2 and @xmath31 . the vo ( @xmath237400 , @xmath237800 ) bands were excluded from the fitting procedure since we do not have a satisfactory line list for this molecule . we carried out fits of the observed spectra for two model grids , original nextgen and semi - empirical , for m4-m8 objects . figures [ fig : fight ] and [ fig : figlt ] show example fits for the red part of the spectra in sample a , and the complete spectra in sample b. figures [ fig : fighk ] and [ fig : fighna ] show examples of the fitting of the atmospheric models , magnified around the na i@xmath238190 and k i@xmath237700 doublet area for sample a. the minimum value of @xmath37-function for each target with m4-m8 spectral type is shown in tables [ tab : resulta ] , [ tab : resultb ] , [ tab : resultab ] and [ tab : resultbb ] . the atmospheric structure of objects of m8.5-m9.5 spectral type differs greatly from early m dwarfs . the dust has a significant impact on the distribution of temperature vs. pressure in these atmospheres . thus , it is incorrect to use the nextgen model for objects with temperatures t@xmath42 2500 k. we used the dusty and cond ( allard et al . 2001 ) atmospheric models for the study of the late m dwarfs synthetic spectra . the dusty and cond models were modified in an identical way to the model improvements for early m dwarfs : we introduced additional scattering of radiation by dust clouds and reduced the abundance of the molecules tio and vo . as with earlier spectral types , we utilised fits to the tio and vo absorption bands and the k i and na i doublets , to determine the stellar fundamental parameters . in weakly ionized atmospheres at t@xmath2@xmath1 3000 k the natural broadening is several orders of magnitude weaker than pressure and stark broadening , and can thus be neglected . the broadening of k i and na i resonance lines is dominated by pressure effects , but the theory of this is not particularly advanced . pressure broadening is calculated using two methods : a collisional approximation ( van der waals theory ) and quasi - static theory ( see burrows & volobuyev 2003 ; allard et al . the use of a collision approximation allows us to describe the profiles of metal lines in early m dwarfs . the quasi - static theory is used in the study of l dwarfs , where energy levels of atomic sodium or potassium are immersed in a sea of molecular hydrogen and are subsequently perturbed by the potential field of the diatomic hydrogen . the modelling of atomic - line broadening for objects that are close to the transition between m and l spectral classes is complicated and this issue is beyond this paper aims . since in our case we could see only the core of the lines and do not see extended wings , our fits should be sufficient without including any broadening . physical properties were derived for objects with m8.5-m9.5 spectral types based on the fitting of high or low resolution spectra and synthetic spectra calculated for cond and dusty models . in addition @xmath37-function analysis provided the best fits . since in sample b there are some objects classified as m8 , we applied fits with the synthetic spectra ( nextgen , dusty and cond ) as well as with appropriate semi - empirical models , to provide the transition between the nextgen and the dusty / cond models . results of these fits are shown in tables [ tab : resultab ] , [ tab : resultbb ] , [ tab : resultac ] , and [ tab : resultbc ] . lp944 - 20 : lp944 - 20 is a known bd of spectral type m9 and we used it as a test for the atmospheric fits as well as to benchmark the age constraints described in following sections . several authors have studied this object in detail to determine its characteristics . tinney ( 1998 ) estimated an age between 475 and 650 myr by evolutionary tracks , while ribas ( 2003 ) determined lp944 - 20 as a kinematic member of the castor moving group and therefore estimated an age of 320@xmath4380 myr . pavlenko et al . ( 2007a ) used semi - empirical atmospheric models to determine the parameters of lp944 - 20 including lithium abundance , of which the best fit gave log n(li)=3.25 @xmath43 0.25 , and found a similar age to the one found by ribas ( 2003 ) . according to previous studies the effective temperature of lp944 - 20 is in the range 2040 @xmath44 t@xmath2 @xmath44 2400 k ( see basri et al . 2000 ; dahn et al . 2002 ; pavlenko et al . the best fit obtained here , with the dusty model , provides t@xmath2=2400 k and log @xmath45= 4.0 ( see table [ tab : resultac ] ) . the log @xmath45 obtained by pavlenko et al . ( 2007a ) was 4.5 , with temperatures of 2000 - 2200 k using cond models . they remarked that temperatures in the outermost layers of the dusty models were higher in comparison to the cond models . this difference is consistent within the uncertainties . all the targets in sample a , with the exception of 2mass0334 - 2130 , present a better fit when a semi - empirical model with dust is used instead of the dust - free nextgen model , as shown by @xmath46 of table [ tab : resulta ] . this would imply that the presence of dust should be taken into account for effective temperatures up to @xmath302900 ( jones & tsuji 1997 , kuznetsov et al . 2012 ) . similarly to lp944 - 20 , the two targets of sample a cooler than m8 spectral type are better fitted by the dusty model ( tables [ tab : resultab ] and [ tab : resultac ] , and figures [ fig : fight ] , [ fig : fighk ] and [ fig : fighna ] ) . for the analysis , we divided sample b into three different spectral type ranges for the fits : @xmath1m8 , @xmath47m8 and as we have many objects with an m8 spectral classification we treated them as a third set and applied both sets of models for them ( see section 4.4 . ) . we used gl 406 ( m6.0 ) as reference star to test spectral typing and model fits . however , we noticed that the flux calibration is very poor for @xmath48@xmath17500 . the cause is uncertain since all other spectra were calibrated correctly . the k i and na i lines were not present in the fault area , hence we centered our fit on @xmath48@xmath477500 . results of objects that were spectroscopically classified as earlier than m8 are shown in table [ tab : resultb ] , where @xmath46 is given in columns 8 and 12 . from these targets , four present a better fit with a semi - empirical model with dust , and two , 2mass1236 - 6536 and 2mass1736 - 0407 , with nextgen . these two , were included in our sample due to their cold photometric " classification ( section 3.2 ) but spectral classification and model fit suggest warmer temperatures . for objects classified as m8 , we applied all models . results are given in table [ tab : resultbb ] . in the case of 2mass0814 - 4020 , dusty and cond models have the same @xmath46 , but the dusty model is more appropriate for the target s temperature . also , despite the higher value of @xmath46 for the nextgen model , we could appreciate by visual inspection and by the @xmath37-function value that in parts of the spectrum nextgen was the best fit . for 2mass1557 - 4350 , the dusty and cond models also have the same @xmath46 . we chose the dusty model as being more appropriate for its temperature . for objects with spectral types later than m8 , parameters determined from the best fit to the observed seds are given in table [ tab : resultbc ] . in this case , it was not easy to find a good fit for the blue part of the spectrum ( @xmath48@xmath17500 ) . in the case of 2mass1909 - 1937 no cond model provided an acceptable result and the dusty model gave no reliable gravity values . it is likely that these objects are also suffering from relatively uncertain flux calibration , but the fact that these are the coolest objects and around the m - l transition , may indicate other issues like the use of an inapropriate set of models . since the k i and na i spectral regions seem to be correctly fitted we keep the results but consider them with caution for 2mass1734 - 1151 and 2mass1745 - 1640 , while we could not extract any acceptable conclusion from the fit for 2mass1909 - 1937 ( see table [ tab : resultbc ] ) . sample a is formed of objects that are already confirmed as kinematic candidates of mgs . since kinematics is not sufficent to confirm membership , determination of a candidate s age can further constrain its group membership to a point of robustness or dismiss it as an old field target that shares kinematics with a young mg . for our candidates , age in some cases can also discriminate between multiple mg candidatures . sample b is formed of astrometric candidates and so further study should be applied to confirm any membership . this can be achieved by : 1 ) using gravity sensitive spectroscopic features to distinguish between young and old ultracool dwarfs , 2 ) using the activity / age relation for late - type stars up to a spectral type of m7 ( mochnacki et al . 2002 ; silvestri et al . 2006 ; reiners & basri 2008 ; jenkins et al . 2009 ) , 3 ) measuring the lithium 6708 doublet ( e.g. rebolo et al . 1996 ; pavlenko et al . 2007a ) as the abundance of lithium is related to mass and age for substellar objects and 4 ) determining @xmath49 to differentiate between young and older m types . figure 9 of paper i shows a plot of evolution - time ( based upon potential group membership ) versus spectral type for the complete sample of candidates . the figure , reproduced and updated here as fig . [ fig : modelo ] , illustrates how an object would be selected for various methods of age constraining follow - up mentioned . candidates that appear to the right of the lithium edge can be followed up with a lithium test programme . objects that appear younger than 200 myr , are eligible for follow - up using spectroscopic gravity sensitive features . candidates that fall to the left of the spectral type m7 , would thus be suitable for age / activity relation follow - up , although candidates with a spectral type close to m7 may be subject to large uncertainties on their age . some candidates can not be tested by any of these methods but will be eligible for age testing using @xmath49 . in paper ii we presented a @xmath49 study ( for sample a ) where we applied this criterion of youth based on figures 9 and 10 of reiners & basri ( 2008 ) to support group membership ( see paper ii ) . we study here the rest of the age - constraining features . the radius of young ucds can be as much as 3 times greater than their eventual equilibrium state ( burrows et al . 2001 ) , and as a result young objects can exhibit significantly lower surface gravities ( 10 - 100 times ) than their evolved counterparts with the same spectral type . low - resolution ( e.g. r@xmath23350 - 2000 ) studies in the optical ( martn et al . 2010 ; martn et al . 1996 ; luhman et al . 1997 ) and infrared ( jones et al . 1996 : gorlova et al . 2004 ; mcgovern et al . 2004 ) have demonstrated that numerous features ( e.g. cah , k i , na i , vo , etc ) can be used as gravity - sensitive ( and thus age sensitive ) diagnostics for young objects . diagnostics should be sensitive to gravity and age for objects that are younger than @xmath23200 myrs ( e.g. barrado y navascus 2006 ) . schlieder et al . ( 2012 ) presented a study of the na i doublet equivalent width in giants , old dwarfs , young dwarfs , and candidate members of the @xmath50 pic moving group using medium resolution spectra . they concluded that the diagnostic is reliable for objects with spectral types later than m4 and younger than 100 myr , and that metallicity has an important role . therefore , this youth indicator is best used on samples with similar metallicity . thus , we aimed to apply this test by determining the surface gravity of the younger mg candidates , although we took into account all candidates up to 200 myr . as mentioned before , the main atomic gravity - sensitive features present in our spectra are : the k i resonance doublet ( 7665 and 7669 ) and the na i subordinate doublet ( 8183 and 8199 ) . we fitted the spectra of the candidates with a synthetic model ( see section 4 ) to determine the log @xmath45 of both samples a and b ( table [ tab : resulta ] , [ tab : resultb ] , [ tab : resultab ] , [ tab : resultbb ] , [ tab : resultac ] , and [ tab : resultbc ] ) . figures [ fig : fighk ] and [ fig : fighna ] show some examples of atmospheric model fitting magnified on the aforementioned features for sample a. we performed two approaches in the surface gravity studies : inferring age - limits from 1 ) the surface gravity obtained from the best fit synthetic models and 2 ) comparison of the equivalent width of gravity - sensitive na i doublet . as mentioned above , surface gravity features can be studied to discriminate if an object is young or old , but it is not easy to associate a log @xmath45 value to an age interval , that is , to have an absolute log @xmath45-age relation . many parameters affect the derived log @xmath45 : atmospheric model used , resolution and instrument . therefore , we observed lp944 - 20 , with known age and previously fitted by different models , to set the range of log @xmath45-age interval for our observations and as a test object for our method of late m dwarf investigation . taking into account the association to the castor mg and the age based on the presence of lithium , we used our log @xmath45 for lp944 - 20 as a reference and compared it to the log @xmath45 of the candidates . from this , we assume that an object with spectral type and log @xmath45 similar to lp944 - 20 is probably of similar age . models from the literature ( e.g. , nextgen , dusty , cond ) , associate similar or lower ages with warmer objects with the same log @xmath45 than to those that are cooler . for example , selecting log @xmath45 in the 4.0 - 4.5 range in dusty and cond models , an object with t@xmath51 @xmath52 2400 k intersects 8 - 30 myr age isochrones , whilst objects with t@xmath51 @xmath53 2400 k intersect 5 - 7 myr , and objects with t@xmath51 @xmath442400 k intersect with isochrones over 40 myrs . both the dusty and cond models present ambiguities for 30 myr isochrones . the cond model presents similar problems for @xmath5340 myr isochrones , but fortunately in this case with temperature ranges far from that of our targets . therefore , we can assume that objects warmer than lp944 - 20 would have , in general , ages @xmath44200 - 300 myr should they have log @xmath45 = 4.0 . since lp944 - 20 is only a single object , in order to constraint this log @xmath45-age relation , we also used the gl 876 field target , observed with the candidate a sample . this allows us to compare our target log @xmath45 values with those of old and intermediate age targets . we fit them in the same way as our candidates and results of the best fit are given in table [ tab : resulta ] and [ tab : resultac ] . as mentioned in section 4.4 , lp944 - 20 is a known member of the castor mg ( age@xmath23200 myrs ) and pavlenko et al . ( 2007a ) obtained an age of @xmath23300 myr through lithium depletion . applying the atmospheric model method described in section 4 , we obtained a log @xmath45 of [email protected] . gl 876 is an m4 dwarf . it is known as an exoplanet host of four planets . literature provides few age calculations , such as 1 - 10 gyr from marcy et al ( 1998 ) , @xmath471 gyr from shankland et al . ( 2006 ) and 0.5 - 1 gyr from correia et al . ( 2010 ) . despite the variations it is clearly an old object that should show a high value of gravity . we find that the nextgen model best fit provides a log @xmath45 of [email protected] . to set the age - gravity relation for our sample , we used these results as a basis . log @xmath45 obtained values of the candidates are 4.0 , 4.5 , 5.0 , and 5.5 , where we can state that objects with log @xmath45=4 are young and still in contraction and that objects with log @xmath45=5.5 are old . with a 0.5 uncertainly , an object with log @xmath45 of 4.5 ( 4.0 - 5.0 ) shows ambiguity when discriminating between young and old . accepting the limitations and the uncertainty in the constraints , spectral type and metallicity dependence , etc , for the atmospheric fits to our sample , objects with log @[email protected] are probably young ( under @xmath23200 myrs ) , objects with log @[email protected] are older but possibly still in contraction ( @xmath23300 myrs ) , and therefore objects with log @[email protected] and log @[email protected] are probably older than 300 myrs . the log @xmath45 obtained with model comparison are given in columns 5 and 9 of table [ tab : resulta ] and [ tab : resultac ] , columns 6 and 10 of table [ tab : resultb ] and [ tab : resultbc ] , and columns 5 , 8 and 11 of table [ tab : resultab ] and [ tab : resultbb ] . additionally , we checked if @xmath54(na i ) measurements can be used to determine youth , based on martn et al . ( 2010 ) and schlieder et al . ( 2012 ) . given the cool nature of the targets , the measurement of equivalent widths in the optical are generally measured relative to the observed local pseudo - continuum formed by molecular absorptions ( mainly tio ) , and therefore the @xmath54s are pseudo - equivalent widths " ( pavlenko 1997 ; zapatero osorio et al . however , we will call them @xmath54 for simplicity hereafter . although there is a considerable scatter in the data ( mainly from the use of different instruments ) martn et al . ( 2010 ) figure 3 plots na i @xmath54 versus spectral class for a few field objects and members or candidates of the upper scorpii ob association . to measure consistent equivalent widths in spectra of different resolutions , they established as a rule that the pseudo - continuum region was between 823 nm and 827 nm , and integrated the line from 817.5 nm to 821.0 nm . their figure shows a clear trend , and they inferred that objects with the weakest na i are likely to have low surface gravity . they established as a rule of thumb that any object with spectral class between m6 and l4 and with a na i doublet detectable but weaker than field counterparts observed with the same spectral resolution , is likely to have a low surface gravity and consequently a very young age ( i.e. , younger than 100 myr ) and substellar mass . sample b have similar resolution to the martn et al . ( 2010 ) data . as such we measured the combined equivalent widths of the two lines of the na i doublet in the same manner ( given in table [ tab : resultfinal ] ) allowing direct comparison . in the case of sample a , we convolved the spectra to the same resolution and then measured @xmath54(na i ) . the left panel of figure [ fig : ewnacomp ] presents equivalent widths of the na i doublet versus spectral type for all targets of sample a as blue crosses , and b as red filled circles , with the martn et al . ( 2010 ) data : 65 high - gravity field objects are plotted as six pointed asterisks , 6 low - gravity objects as open triangles , 12 reference field stars as open circles and 7 upper sco candidates as solid hexagons . while the metallicities of all mgs are similar to solar , the upper sco cluster does not yet have a robust metallicity determination , and other objects in martn et al . ( 2010 ) have different metallicities . we took the information from @xmath54(na i ) studies in schlieder et al . ( 2012 ) into account when compare samples a and b with martn et al . ( 2010 ) . for sample a , if we look into moving group candidatures ( thus age ) and @xmath54s(na i ) , they are inconsistent ( table [ tab : resultfinal ] column 2 ) . that is to say that some young mg candidates present a higher @xmath54(na i ) than others which have candidature to older mgs . but if we take into account the final mg membership given in column 11 of table [ tab : resultfinal ] , most of sample a targets are finally classified as candidates to mgs with ages @xmath55200 myr ( except one , sips2039 - 1126 ) , and therefore the @xmath54(na i ) become consistent ( see figure [ fig : ewnacomp ] right panel ) . sips0007 - 2458 and 2mass0334 - 2130 , both candidates to ic2391 present values of @xmath54(na i ) too high for ic2391 age . since we obtained @xmath54(na i)=6.5 for lp944 - 20 , the value of @xmath54(na i)=7.3 for sips2039 - 1126 is comparatively high for its pleiades membership . convolution might have introduced additional noise affecting the comparison and we discuss further this target in section 5.3 . for sample b , if we look into moving group candidatures and @xmath54s(na i ) ( table [ tab : resultfinal ] column 2 ) , they are consistent . that is in general , target candidates to ic2391 and the pleiades show the lowest @xmath54s , candidates to castor and sirius show higher , intermediate @xmath54 values and candidates to hyades show the highest values of @xmath54 ( figure [ fig : ewnacomp ] right panel ) . the two targets showing low values of @xmath54s(na i ) are 2mass1326 - 5022 , candidate to ic 2391 and 2mass1557 - 4350 , candidate to pleiades and ic 2391 . the rest of the candidates show higher values in agreement with their mg candidatures except for 2mass1734 - 1151 , m9 candidate to pleiades but showing larger values of @xmath54s ( na i ) than lp944 - 20 . subsequent studies by skumanich ( 1972 ) show that activity decreases over time for late - type stars . however , after a spectral type of @xmath30 m3 - 4 , stars become fully convective and the activity is driven by a turbulent dynamo in a mechanism that is still not clear . many studies have found evidence that the age - activity relation extends into the m dwarf regime ( see e.g , silvestri et al . 2006 ; mochnacki et al . 2002 ; mohanty & basri ( 2003 ) ; reiners & basri 2008 ) . recently , some authors ( berger et al . 2008 ; west et al . 2008 ) have shown that the fraction of active m0-m7 stars decreases with the vertical distance from the galactic plane , further evidence of an age - activity relation . comparing activity data to dynamical simulations , west et al . ( 2008 ) derive an `` activity life - time '' relation for m dwarfs of spectral type m0-m7 in the range 0.4 - 8 gyr . following this , we can identify older non - mg ucds in our sample through lack of chromospheric emission . comparing activity levels of our sample with activity levels of objects of the same spectral type and with known age , we can infer age ranges for our targets that would help us to confirm ( or otherwise ) their mg membership in the same way of other literature examples such us stauffer et al . ( 1995 ; fig . 13 ) , stauffer et al . ( 1997 ; fig . 8) , terndrup et al . ( 2000 ; fig . 9 ) , barrado y navascus et al . ( 2004 ; fig . 5 ) , shkolnik et al . ( 2009 ; fig . although there are several chromospheric activity indicators ( ca ii h&k , balmer lines , ca ii infrared ) , we used the h@xmath0 emission since it is included in the spectra presented here ( with the exception of the sips2039 - 1126 spectrum ) . young m dwarfs generally have h@xmath0 in emission , with the average equivalent width increasing to later spectral types ( e.g. west et al . generally the level of chromospheric activity is measured by comparison of the diagnostic line s flux , but for m dwarfs equivalent width is also used . we derived h@xmath0 pseudo - equivalent widths by direct integration of the line profile using the splot task in iraf , however , we will utilise them as @xmath54s . taking into account that @xmath54(h@xmath0 ) will reflect any activity variability , often present in young objects , and that moving groups with different ages will show different activity saturation levels as well as a higher dispersion in the level of activity when they are older ( see e.g. stauffer et al . 1997 , pizzolato et al . 2003 ; ryan et al . 2005 ; lpez - santiago 2005 ; martnez - arnaz et al . 2011 ) , we compared the @xmath54(h@xmath0 ) versus spectral type of our candidates with objects of known age ( obtained from other methods ) . we compiled a sample of m dwarfs with known age and @xmath54(h@xmath0 ) from the literature . these were taken from hyades and pleaides members in terndrup et al . ( 2000 ) , young and old disk and field stars in mohanty & basri ( 2003 ) and from a compilation of targets with ages determined by different methods in shkolnik et al . when using targets with mg or cluster memberships , we assigned them the age of the cluster . from mohanty & basri ( 2003 ) , we assigned an averaged value of 500 myr to yd , 600 myr to yo ( old - young ) , 1 gyr for od and more than 1200 myr for halo targets . the @xmath54(h@xmath0 ) of our objects is given in column 3 of table [ tab : resultfinal ] . figure [ fig : ewhacomp ] left panel presents @xmath54(h@xmath0 ) versus spectral type for our candidates , with blue crosses and red filled circles for sample a and b respectively , in comparison with data from the literature . in the right panel of figure [ fig : ewhacomp ] , only three ranges of ages are plotted to better discriminate the possible age interval of our samples . sample a targets are plotted as filled squares and sample b as filled triangles , where targets classified with ages @xmath53300 myr are plotted in blue and targets with ages @xmath1300 myr are plotted in red . although theoretically equal , equivalent widths measured in lower resolution spectra can be slightly larger than measured in higher resolution spectra ( due to line blending ) , and pseudo - equivalent width measurements show variation with resolution , therefore there is a possibility that variability effects are seen in our observations . taking into consideration that only one data point is available for each of our candidates ( and therefore variability can not be determined ) , that older mg members can present higher scatter , and that for sample b , values of @xmath54(h@xmath0 ) have been measured at low - resolution , we have determined a rough age interval for 18 of the candidates ( we have included targets in the limiting spectral type m7 and m7.5 ) . we have assumed that the candidates are single objects . any stellar or substellar companion would probably increase the activity levels making the targets look younger when we measure @xmath54(h@xmath0 ) ( e.g. basri et al . 1995 ; ruten 1987 ; schrijver & zwaan 1991 ; glvez - ortiz 2005 ) . all targets in sample a and b with spectral types under m7.5 , have @xmath54(h@xmath0 ) values inside the limits of an age that agree with at least one of their mg candidature ( see columns 3 and 4 of table [ tab : resultfinal ] and figure [ fig : ewhacomp ] ) . it should be noted that the sips2039 - 1126 spectrum does not include the h@xmath0 region , thus the activity criterion has not been used in this case . the li i doublet at 6708 is an important diagnostic of age in young late - type stars . lithium is destroyed in fully convective low - mass objects , with mass from 0.3 - 0.06m@xmath56 ( e.g. rebolo et al . 1996 ) as all acquire core temperatures as they heat up during early contraction . convection ensures that atmospheric lithium abundance reflects core lithium content , and the observable lithium doublet thus acts as a gauge for the core temperature and contraction age . the so - called `` lithium edge '' that separates objects with lithium from those without , can be seen in co - eval populations ( e.g. in open clusters and moving groups ) , through the spectral type ( or mass ) . the lithium edge advances towards later spectral type as a population ages ( see fig . 9 and caption of paper i ) , and the presence or absence of lithium thus provides a critical age constraint as a function of an object s spectral type . due to the low resolution and the presence of artifacts in the li i spectral region for sample b , we searched for the li i doublet only in sample a candidates . the li i region in the sample a spectra show s / n values of no more than 10 in all the 12 candidates which hampers the search for the absorption line . we found the li i absorption line in sips2045 - 6332 and sips2039 - 1126 only , but we do not discard the possibility of other fainter candidates with no signal in this region , presenting some absorption when better spectra can be achieved . we also measured li i in lp944 - 20 with the parameters found here , obtaining logn(li ) = 3.00 @xmath43 0.5 dex , using synthetic spectra with t@xmath2=2400 k , @xmath31 = 4.0 , dusty atmosphere structure and a rotational velocity of 35 km s@xmath36 ( measured by us ) . this is within the uncertainties of other literature findings ( see section 4.4.1 ) . clarke ( 2010 ) found the lithium signature in sips2045 - 6332 and sips2039 - 1126 suggesting youth and a bd nature inside the mg membership . here , we obtained the theoretical li i pseudo - equivalent widths , relative to the computed pseudo - continuum formed by molecular absorption , via direct integration of the line profile over the spectral interval 6703.0 - 6710.8 . figure [ fig : lithium ] shows the li i area for sips2045 - 6332 and sips2039 - 1126 with their respective fits . li abundance of logn(li ) = 3.5 @xmath43 0.5 dex for sips2045 - 6332 and logn(li ) = 3.0 @xmath43 0.5 dex for sips2039 - 1126 provides age estimations as young as 7 - 100 myrs or the possible bd condition . the lithium test was first proposed by rebolo , martn & maggazz ( 1992 ) and developed by magazz , martn & rebolo ( 1993 ) to distinguish bds from stellar objects . while stars and low mass stars deplete lithium with time ( see explanation in section 5.3 ) , substellar objects with [email protected] m@xmath57 mass can not achieve the temperature needed to destroy lithium and so it should be preserved independently of the object s age ( chabrier & baraffe 2000 ; basri et al . since young low mass objects have not yet depleted all lithium , the discrimination between stars and bd through the lithium test should take age into account . * * sips2045 - 6332 : * sips2045 - 6332 , was classified through several spectral indices as an m8.5 spectral type ( paper ii ) . it shows a clear li i absorption line ( figure [ fig : lithium ] ) . we used the parameters found in the best fit of the synthetic models and calculated its lithium abundance , logn(li ) = 3.5 @xmath43 0.5 dex . the dusty best fit @xmath31 values of [email protected] and this lithium provide an age that confirms sips2045 - 6332 as probable castor member . + we noticed that @xmath54(h@xmath0 ) value , 2.1 , is quite small for a young object . but with a m8.5 spectral type , this value agrees with the findings of other authors , e.g. mohanty & basri ( 2003 ) , reiners & basri ( 2010 ) , barnes et al . ( 2013 ) , that found that the h@xmath0 emission is roughly constant from mid- to late m , but there is a sharp drop between m8-l0 ( see e.g. fig . 5 of mohanty & basri 2003 ) , from which they show little or significantly reduced emission in spite of significant rotation . + at the castor mg s age , and with a spectral type of m8.5 ( [email protected]@xmath57 ) , lithium confirms it also as a bd . * * sips2039 - 1126 : * similarly , sips2039 - 1126 , was classified through several spectral indices as an m8.0 spectral type ( paper ii ) . it shows a li i absorption line ( figure [ fig : lithium ] ) although the s / n of the area is only @xmath58 . using the parameters from the best fit of the synthetic models , we obtained logn(li ) = 3.0 @xmath43 0.5 dex ( section 5.3 ) . the dusty best fit @xmath31 values of [email protected] suggest it is probably still in contraction . in section 5.1 we saw that @xmath54(na i ) of sips2039 - 1126 was high considering its pleiades membership . we have used gravity criteria for targets up to 200 myr but as seen in fig . [ fig : modelo ] , following schlieder et al . ( 2012 ) , some pleiades members may lie outside these limits . we thus can not discard this target as a pl member taking into account the rest of the evidence . + at the pleiades age or in the age interval suggested by the gravity values , the lithium depletion boundary occurs at m6.5 ( m=0.075m@xmath57 ; barrado y navascus et al . thus , with an m8.0 spectral type , lithium confirms sips2039 - 1126 as a bd . we have presented a study of the spectral signatures of 25 low - mass objects that were candidate members of five young moving groups . we studied different typical age - constraining spectroscopic criteria utilising high and low resolution spectra , and combined the results to extract a final membership assessment for each target . we took into account spectral classification and thus approximated atmospheric temperature to apply the most appropriate model or models in the search of the best physical parameter constraints . when we used the synthetic stellar atmospheric models , the good agreement between observed and theoretical energy distributions suggests that semi - empirical models describe well the impact of dust in the atmospheres of m dwarfs . @xmath37-function analysis shows that the inclusion of dust effects makes it possible to achieve better fits for objects with @xmath59 k. in both samples , although youth can generally be established , @xmath31 and @xmath54(na i ) were not useful for discriminating between different mgs . some targets of sample a that were candidates to the hy moving group having lower @xmath31 values than candidates to younger mgs , and similarly in @xmath54(na i ) values . in sample b the values are more consistent but most of the targets have several candidatures , making the situation more complicated . however , looking at the final membership results , only one target of sample a is classified as a member of a mg with age @xmath1200 myr , which makes this criterion non applicable for most of them . for sample b , in spite of the multiple membership candidatures in the final results , we can discriminate between the lower values of @xmath31 ( or lower values of @xmath54s(na i ) ) for targets that are members of younger mgs , medium values for targets that are members of intermediate age mgs and the higher values for targets that are members of oldest mgs , which finally is consistent with the @xmath31-age relation . the comparison of @xmath54(na i)s is probably useful to discriminate very young targets ( less than 100 myr ) in a homogeneous sample ( as suggested by schlieder et al . 2012 ) while @xmath31 values are probably useful to discriminate very young ( less than 100 myr ) and very old ( more that 600 myr ) objects , serving as complementary study to other criteria . the activity - age relation is a reasonably useful age criterion up to @xmath30m7 spectral type but activity variability , binarity , and the comparison of different instruments / resolutions can introduce considerable uncertainties in age estimation . the presence of lithium discriminates between young and old low mass stars but an ambiguity between young low mass stars and bds limits its use in this cool temperature region . gravity sensitive features and rotational velocity can be useful youth indicators in support of activity and lithium diagnostics , but clearly have large dispersion and they need to be applied in conjunction with similar data . for a reliable constraint of cool object ages , a combination of different criteria are needed . we find 10 of the 13 objects from sample a to be probable members of one of the mgs , and also that 2mass0020 - 2346 is a young disk member . sips0007 - 2458 , a candidate member of the ic2391 mg , shows positive candidature under most criteria but does not show the expected lithium ( associated with the age of the ic2391 mg ) . due to the age constraint from @xmath60 emission and surface gravity , we are inclined to think that sips0007 - 2458 is probably a young object from the yd class , but is not in the ic2391 mg , although it could also be a contaminant field object . 2mass0334 - 2130 is a similar case , with an m4.5 - 6 spectral type , it should contain lithium if it were an ic2391 mg member . except for the @xmath60 criterion , that could be reflecting a maximum in activity level or the influence of an unseen companion , everything indicates that 2mass0334 - 2130 is older than the ic2391 mg . thus we also conclude that 2mass0334 - 2130 is not an ic2391 member , although it could be a young object from the yd , or a contaminant target from the field . in sample b , 10 objects could be mg members , although more information is needed to discriminate between the possible mg membership of objects with several candidatures . we could not obtain any results for 2mass1909 - 1937 , so this remains an astrometric candidate to the castor mg . 2mass1734 - 1151 gave contradictory results so it also remains an astrometric pleiades mg candidate until further analysis can be performed . we also confirm two moving group candidates , sips2045 - 6332 and sips2039 - 1126 , as bds . with all the acquired information , we find that 85% , 83% and 84% of samples a , b , and both combined , show spectroscopic signatures of youth in agreement with the age of the moving group to which they present kinematic membership . this result suggests that there is a fairly low rate of contamination in such kinematic candidate samples . also , there are candidates that can not be confirmed or dismissed with the information obtained , which might ( in the future ) increase the final confirmation rate . we note that additional diagnostics to assess membership may be measured in the future , such as chemical tagging . recently , in a kinematical - chemical investigation of the ab dor moving group `` stream '' , barenfeld et al . ( 2013 ) shows that kinematics , color - magnitude positions , and stellar youth indicators alone can be insufficient for testing whether a kinematic group of stars actually shares a common origin . future chemical study of our mg candidates will complement this study . in addition , this study has also helped to test and improve the atmosphere models for cool dwarfs ( see kuznetsov et al . 2012 and kuznetsov et al . youth can be an advantage for various reasons . because young objects are brighter they can be detected and studied out to greater distance than older , fainter objects . also , the proximity of the mgs can allows the exploration of the faint circumstellar environment at relatively small distances from the star . indeed , we will target our strongest mg candidates to search for lower mass companions using high resolution imaging techniques ( e.g. adaptive optics ) . the discovery of planetary systems around young and low - mass objects provides crucial information for the understanding of planetary and stellar formation . from our complete study of the 80 objects considered ( within papers i , ii and this paper ) , we have found a total of 45 new possible mg members ( with 8 of them showing more than one mg candidature ) and around 21 possible young disk objects with no clear membership of the 5 mgs considered . of these we find 26 , 13 , 6 , 4 and 5 possible members of the hyades , castor , ursa major , pleiades and ic2391 mgs respectively . tables [ tab : comptod ] and [ tab : compothers ] of the appendix compile all the m - l dwarfs investigated in our study . lllccc name & @xmath0 ( 2000 ) & @xmath61 ( 2000 ) & j - mag & moving group@xmath62 & @xmath63@xmath64 + & ( h m s ) & ( @xmath65 ) & & candidature & ( km s@xmath36 ) + sips0007 - 2458 & 0 7 7.800 & -24 58 3.80 & [email protected] & ic & 18 + 2mass0020 - 2346 & 0 20 23.155 & 23 46 5.38 & [email protected] & yd & 12 + denis0021 - 4244 & 0 21 5.896 & -42 44 43.33 & [email protected] & ic , ca & 11 + sips0027 - 5401 & 0 27 23.240 & 54 1 46.20 & [email protected] & hy & 27 + sips0153 - 5122 & 1 53 11.430 & 51 22 24.99 & [email protected] & ic , hy & 14 + sips0214 - 3237 & 2 14 45.440 & -32 37 58.20 & [email protected] & hy & 18 + sips0235 - 0711 & 2 35 49.470 & 7 11 21.90 & [email protected] & hy & 22 + 2mass0334 - 2130 & 3 34 10.657 & 21 30 34.35 & [email protected] & ic & @xmath110@xmath66 + sips2039 - 1126 & 20 39 13.081 & -11 26 52.30 & [email protected] & pl & @xmath4715 + sips2045 - 6332 & 20 45 2.278 & -63 32 5.30 & [email protected] & pl , ca & @xmath4715 + lehpm4908 & 22 36 42.656 & -69 34 59.30 & [email protected] & hy & - + 2mass2254 - 3228 & 22 54 58.110 & 32 28 52.20 & [email protected] & pl , ca & 19 + lehpm6542 & 23 57 54.822 & 19 55 1.89 & [email protected] & hy & 16 + @xmath62 mg to which targets are kinematic candidate ( paper ii ) . hyades mg ; si= ursa major group ; ca= castor mg ; pl= pleiades ; ic = ic 2391 mg ; yd= other young disk object . + @xmath64 from paper ii . + @xmath66 measused with low s / n . + lllcccc name & @xmath0 ( 2000 ) & @xmath61 ( 2000 ) & j - mag & moving group + & ( h m s ) & ( @xmath65 ) & & candidature + 2mass0814 - 4020 & 08 14 35.46 & -40 20 49.26 & [email protected] & hy + 2mass1146 - 4754 & 11 46 51.04 & -47 54 38.17 & [email protected] & si + 2mass1236 - 6536 & 12 36 32.38 & -65 36 35.6 & [email protected] & pl , ca , ic , si + 2mass1326 - 5022 & 13 26 53.48 & -50 22 27.04 & [email protected] & ic , ca + 2mass1433 - 5148 & 14 33 41.95 & -51 48 03.70 & [email protected] & ca , pl , si , ic + 2mass1557 - 4350 & 15 57 27.39 & -43 50 21.47 & [email protected] & pl , ca , ic + 2mass1618 - 3214 & 16 18 08.92 & -32 14 36.17 & [email protected] & ic , ca , si + 2mass1734 - 1151 & 17 34 30.53 & -11 51 38.83 & [email protected] & pl + 2mass1736 - 0407 & 17 36 56.09 & - 4 07 25.84 & [email protected] & si , ca + 2mass1745 - 1640 & 17 45 34.66 & -16 40 53.81 & [email protected] & si , ca , hy + 2mass1756 - 4518 & 17 56 29.63 & -45 18 22.47 & [email protected] & ca + 2mass1909 - 1937 & 19 09 08.21 & -19 37 47.96 & [email protected] & ca + ccccccc number & date & telescope & instrument & spect . range & dispersion + & & & & ( ) & ( ) + 1 & 28/03 - 21/06/08 & eso - vlt - u2 & uves@xmath62 & 6700 - 10425@xmath64 & 0.027 - 0.041 + 2 & 01 - 09 - 2009 - 09/01/2010 & eso - vlt - u2 & uves@xmath62 & 5700 - 7530 & 7650 - 9470 & 0.027 - 0.041 + 3 & 03 - 05/05/2010 & 6.5 m baade - maguellan & imacs short - camera@xmath67 & 6550 - 10000 & 1.98 + 4 & 15 - 16/02/2011 & 6.5 m baade - maguellan & imacs short - camera@xmath67 & 4300 - 10800 & 1.97 + @xmath62 uves : ultraviolet and visual echelle spectrograph . + @xmath64 effective range . + @xmath67 imacs : the inamori magellan areal camera and spectrograph . + lcccccccccccccc & & & & + object & @xmath68 & @xmath69 & & @xmath32 & @xmath31 & [ m / h ] & @xmath46 & & @xmath32 & @xmath31 & [ m / h ] & @xmath46 & best fit@xmath62 + & & ( k ) & & ( k ) & ( cm s@xmath70 ) & dex & & & ( k ) & cm s@xmath70 & dex & & + gl876 & m4.0 & 3100 & & 3400 & 5.5 & 0.0 & 2.9 & & - & - & - & - & nextgen + sips0007 - 2458 & m7.5 & 2550 & & 2700 & 4.5 & -1.0 & 7.0 & & 2700 & 4.5 & 0.0 & 6.2 & s .- e . + 2mass0020 - 2346 & m6.0 & 2800 & & 2800 & 5.5 & -0.5 & 4.8 & & 2800 & 5.0 & 0.0 & 4.56 & s .- e . + sips0027 - 5401 & m6.5 & 2650 & & 2700 & 4.5 & -1.0 & 3.35 & & 2700 & 4.5 & 0.0 & 2.70 & s .- e . + sips0153 - 5122 & m6.0 & 2800 & & 2800 & 5.5 & -0.5 & 2.42 & & 2800 & 5.0 & 0.0 & 2.31 & s .- e . + sips0214 - 3237 & m6.5 & 2650 & & 2800 & 5.0 & -1.0 & 1.44 & & 2800 & 5.0 & 0.0 & 1.2 & s .- e . + sips0235 - 0711 & m6.0 & 2800 & & 2700 & 5.0 & -1.0 & 0.97 & & 2700 & 4.5 & 0.0 & 0.91 & s .- e . + 2mas0334 - 2130 & m4.5-m6.0 & 3000 - 2800 & & 2800 & 5.5 & -0.5 & 4.65 & & 2800 & 5.0 & 0.0 & 5.65 & @xmath66 + lehpm4908 & m6.0 & 2800 & & 2800 & 4.5 & -1.0 & 7.02 & & 2900 & 5.0 & 0.0 & 5.70 & s .- e . + 2mass2254 - 3228 & m5.5 & 2850 & & 2700 & 5.0 & -1.0 & 1.37 & & 2700 & 4.5 & 0.0 & 1.25 & s .- e . + lehpm6542 & m6.0 & 2800 & & 2800 & 5.0 & -0.5 & 13.5 & & 2700 & 4.5 & 0.0 & 4.03 & s .- e . + @xmath62 nextgen or semi - empirical ( s .- e . ) + @xmath66 both models are equally likely . + lccccccccccccccc & & & & + object & @xmath71 & @xmath68 & @xmath72 & & @xmath32 & @xmath31 & [ m / h ] & @xmath46 & & @xmath32 & @xmath31 & [ m / h ] & @xmath46 & best fit + & & ( k ) & ( k ) & & ( k ) & ( cm s@xmath70 ) & dex & & & ( k ) & cm s@xmath70 & dex & & + 2mass1146 - 4754 & m8.5 & m7 - 8 & @xmath232500 & & 2800 & 5.5 & -0.5 & 0.39 & & 2700 & 4.5 & 0.0 & 0.18 & s .- e . + 2mass1236 - 6536 & m7.5 & m4.0 & 3100 & & 3200 & 5.5 & 0.0 & 0.64 & & 2900 & 4.0 & 0.0 & 1.14 & nextgen + 2mass1326 - 5022 & m9.0 & m7.5 & 2550 & & 2800 & 5.0 & 0.0 & 0.57 & & 2700 & 4.0 & 0.0 & 0.22 & s .- e . + 2mass1433 - 5148 & m9.0 & m6 - 7 & @xmath232650 & & 3000 & 5.5 & 0.0 & 0.58 & & 2900 & 5.0 & 0.0 & 0.27 & s .- e . + 2mass1618 - 3214 & m7.0 & m6.5 & 2650 & & 2800 & 5.5 & -0.5 & 0.69 & & 2700 & 4.5 & 0.0 & 0.41 & s .- e . + 2mass1736 - 0407 & m8.5 & m4 - 5 & @xmath233000 & & 3200 & 5.0 & 0.0 & 0.49 & & 2900 & 4.0 & 0.0 & 0.55 & nextgen + lccccccccccccccc & & & & & + object & @xmath68 & @xmath69 & & @xmath32 & @xmath31 & @xmath46 & & @xmath32 & @xmath31 & @xmath46 & & @xmath32 & @xmath31 & @xmath46 & best fit + & & ( k ) & & ( k ) & ( cm s@xmath70 ) & & & ( k ) & cm s@xmath70 & & & ( k ) & cm s@xmath70 & & + sips2039 - 1126 & m8.0 & 2500 & & 2800 & 5.5 & 22.45 & & 2600 & 5.0 & 39.96 & & 2600 & 4.5 & 40.12 & + semi - empirical & & & & 2700 & 4.5 & 22.90 & & 2600 & 4.5 & 20.00 & & 2600 & 4.5 & 20.01 & s .- e . dusty + lccccccccccccccc & & & & & + object & @xmath71 & @xmath68 & & @xmath32 & @xmath31 & @xmath46 & & @xmath32 & @xmath31 & @xmath46 & & @xmath32 & @xmath31 & @xmath46 & best fit + & & & & ( k ) & ( cm s@xmath70 ) & & & ( k ) & cm s@xmath70 & & & ( k ) & cm s@xmath70 & & + 2mass0814 - 4020 & l4.0 & m7 - 8 & & 2700 & 5.0 & 0.74 & & 2600 & 5.5 & 1.15 & & 2600 & 5.0 & 1.22 & + semi - empirical & & & & 2700 & 4.5 & 0.35 & & 2600 & 4.5 & 0.28 & & 2600 & 4.5 & 0.28 & s .- e . dusty @xmath73 + 2mass1557 - 4350 & l0.0 & m7.5 - 8.5 & & 2800 & 4.5 & 0.74 & & 2600 & 5.5 & 0.93 & & 2400 & 5.5 & 1.11 + semi - empirical & & & & 2800 & 4.0 & 0.31 & & 2500 & 4.0 & 0.29 & & 2600 & 4.0 & 0.29 & s .- e . dusty @xmath62 + 2mass1756 - 4518 & m7.5 & m8 - 9 & & 2600 & 5.5 & 0.21 & & 2600 & 5.5 & 0.18 & & 2600 & 5.0 & 0.20 & + semi - empirical & & & & 2600 & 4.0 & 0.09 & & 2600 & 5.5 & 0.08 & & 2600 & 5.0 & 0.10 & s .- e . dusty + @xmath62 dusty and cond have the same @xmath46 , but dusty model is more appropriate in the temperature range . + @xmath64 we could appreciate parts of the spectrum were nextgen was the best fit . + lcccccccccccccc & & & & + object & @xmath68 & @xmath69 & & @xmath32 & @xmath31 & [ m / h ] & @xmath46 & & @xmath32 & @xmath31 & [ m / h ] & @xmath46 & best fit + & & ( k ) & & ( k ) & ( cm s@xmath70 ) & dex & & & ( k ) & cm s@xmath70 & dex & & + denis0021 - 4244 & m9.5 & 2300 - 2400 & & 2000 & 5.5 & 0.0 & 7.85 & & 2400 & 5.5 & 0.0 & 13.40 & + semi - empirical & & & & 2400 & 4.0 & 0.0 & 5.89 & & 2500 & 4.0 & 0.0 & 6.62 & s .- e . dusty + sips2045 - 6332 & m8.5 & 2300 - 2400 & & 2000 & 5.5 & 0.0 & 11.39 & & 2400 & 4.0 & 0.0 & 17.19 & + semi - empirical & & & & 2400 & 4.0 & 0.0 & 8.14 & & 2500 & 4.0 & 0.0 & 10.30 & s .- e . dusty + lp944 - 20 & m9.0 & 2300 - 2400 & & 2000 & 5.5 & 0.0 & 0.42 & & 2400 & 5.5 & 0.0 & 0.57 & + semi - empirical & & & & 2400 & 4.0 & 0.0 & 0.29 & & 2400 & 4.0 & 0.0 & 0.35 & s .- e . dusty + lccccccccccccccc & & & & + object & @xmath71 & @xmath68 & @xmath69 & & @xmath32 & @xmath31 & [ m / h ] & @xmath46 & & @xmath32 & @xmath31 & [ m / h ] & @xmath46 & best fit + & & & ( k ) & & ( k ) & ( cm s@xmath70 ) & dex & & & ( k ) & cm s@xmath70 & dex & & + 2mass1734 - 1151 & l0.0 & m9.0 & 2300 - 2500 & & 2600 & 5.5 & 0.0 & 1.34 & & 2600 & 5.0 & 0.0 & 1.43 & + semi - empirical & & & & & 2400 & 4.0 & 0.0 & 0.79 & & 2400 & 4.0 & 0.0 & 0.86 & s .- e . dusty + 2mass1745 - 1640 & l8.0 & m9-l2 & @xmath232300 - 2000 & & 2000 & 5.5 & 0.0 & 0.06 & & 2200 & 5.5 & 0.0 & 0.07 & + semi - empirical & & & & & 2000 & 5.5 & 0.0 & 0.05 & & 2200 & 5.5 & 0.0 & 0.05 & s .- e . dusty + 2mass1909 - 1937 & m9.0 & l0.0 & @xmath232200 & & 2100 & 3.5 & 0.0 & 0.55 & & - & - & - & - & + semi - empirical & & & & & 2000/2100 & 6.0/3.5 & 0.0 & 0.45 & & - & - & - & - & s .- e . + lcccccccccc object & @xmath54(na i)@xmath62 & @xmath54(h@xmath0)@xmath64 & age@xmath64 & mg memb . & m. from & m. from & m. from & m. from & m. from & final mg + & ( ) & ( ) & ( myr ) & ( kinem / astrom)@xmath67 & @xmath54(na i)@xmath62 & @xmath54(h@xmath0)@xmath64 & @xmath31@xmath74 & li i@xmath75 & @xmath49@xmath76 & + sips0007 - 2458 & 8.2 & 11.0 & 1 - 300 & ic & n & y & y & n & y & _ yd _ + 2mass0020 - 2346 & 8.1 & 6.1 & @xmath23300 & yd & y & y & y & ? & y & _ yd _ + denis0021 - 4244 & 8.4 & @xmath66 & n / a & ic , ca & ca & n / a & y & - & n & _ ca _ + sips0027 - 5401 & 7.7 & 8.1 & @xmath23300 & hy & n / a & y & y & y & y & _ hy _ + sips0153 - 5122 & 8.0 & 7.5 & @xmath23300 & ic , hy & hy & hy & hy & hy & y & _ hy _ + sips0214 - 3237 & 7.9 & 8.4 & @xmath23300 & hy & n / a & y & y & y & y & _ hy _ + sips0235 - 0711 & 7.9 & 7.7 & @xmath53300 & hy & n / a & y & y & y & y & _ hy _ + 2mass0334 - 2130 & 7.3 & 11.5 & 1 - 300 & ic & n & y & n & n & ? & _ yd _ + sips2045 - 6332 & 6.3 & 2.1 & n / a & pl , ca & ca & n / a & y & y & ? & _ ca _ + sips2039 - 1126 & 7.3 & - & - & pl & n & - & y & y & y & _ pl _ + lehpm4908 & 7.3 & 6.5 & @xmath23300 & hy & n / a & y & y & y & - & _ hy _ + 2mass2254 - 3228 & 8.5 & 5.8 & @xmath23300 & pl , ca & ca & ca & y & - & y & _ ca _ + lehpm6542 & 7.6 & 4.9 & @xmath53300 & hy & n / a & y & y & y & y & _ hy _ + & & & & & & & & & + 2mass0814 - 4020 & 9.0 & 7.2 & @xmath53300 & hy & n / a & y & y & n / a & n / a & _ hy _ + 2mass1146 - 4754 & 7.9 & 5.2 & @xmath53300 & si & n / a & y & y & n / a & n / a & _ si _ + 2mass1236 - 6536 & 5.8 & 1.0 & 300 - 1200 & pl , ic , ca , si & ca , si & ca , si & n & n / a & n / a & _ ca , si _ + 2mass1326 - 5022 & 4.2 & 23.6 & 1 - 100 & ic , ca & ic & ic & y & n / a & n / a & _ ic _ + 2mass1433 - 5148 & 7.9 & 19.8 & 1 - 100 & pl , ic , ca , si & ca , si & pl , ic & si & n / a & n / a & _ ca ? , si _ + 2mass1557 - 4350 & 4.0 & 16.4 & 1 - 100 & pl , ic , ca & pl , ic & n / a & y & n / a & n / a & _ pl , ic _ + 2mass1618 - 3214 & 8.0 & 7.8 & 1 - 300 & ic , ca , si & ca , si & y & y & n / a & n / a & _ ic ? , ca , si _ + 2mass1734 - 1151 & 7.7 & 5.5 & n / a & pl & n & n / a & y & n / a & n / a & _ pl ? _ + 2mass1736 - 0407 & 6.1@xmath77 & 4.2 & 50 - 300 & ca , si & n / a & y & y & n / a & n / a & _ ca , si _ + 2mass1745 - 1640 & 5.6 & 1.4 & @xmath53300 & ca , si , hy & y & n / a & hy & n / a & n / a & _ ca ? , si ? , hy _ + 2mass1756 - 4518 & 7.5 & 3.2 & n / a & ca & n / a & n / a & y & n / a & n / a & _ ca _ + 2mass1909 - 1937 & 6.3 & @xmath66 & n / a & ca & n / a & n / a & - & n / a & n / a & _ ca ? _ + @xmath62 equivalenth width of the na i doublet as expained in section 5.1 . + @xmath64 see section 5.2 . + @xmath67 mg membership from kinematic ( sample a ) or from photometric and astrometric criteria ( sample b ) . see section 2 . + @xmath74 from value obtained in the synthetic fits , given in columns 5 and 9 of tables [ tab : resulta ] , [ tab : resultb ] and [ tab : resultab ] . + @xmath75 only applicable for high resolution data . see section 5.3 . + @xmath76 from paper ii . + @xmath66 absorption line filled in with emission . + @xmath78 absorption line . + @xmath77 measured with a cosmic ray in the line . glvez - ortiz acknowledges financial support by the spanish micinn under the consolider - ingenio 2010 program grant csd2006 - 00070 : first science with the gtc ( http://www.iac.es/consolider-ingenio-gtc ) . she also acknowledges the support of a jae - doc csic fellowship co - funded with the european social fund under the program _ junta para la ampliacin de estudios_. m.k . kuznetsov and ya.v . pavlenko work was supported by eu pf7 marie curie initial training networks ( itn ) ropacs project ( ga n 213646 ) . financial support was also provided by the spanish ministerio de ciencia e innovacin and ministerio de economa y competitividad under aya2011- 30147-c03 - 03 grant . s.l.f . acknowledges funding support from the eso - government of chile mixed committee 2009 , and from the gemini conicyt grant # 32090014/2009 . j.s.j . acknowledges funding by fondecyt through grant 3110004 and partial support from cata ( pb06 , conicyt ) , the gemini - conicyt fund and from the comit mixto eso - gobierno de chile . financial support was also provided by the mexican research council ( conacyt ) grant . based on observations made with eso telescopes , with uves high - resolution optical spectrograph at vlt kueyen 8.2-m telescope at paranal observatory ( chile ) in programmes 081.c-0222(a ) and 084.c-0403(a ) . and observations obtained at the magellan telescope at las campanas ( chile ) observatory . 99 anders e. , grevesse n. , 1989 , geochim . acta 53 , 3273 antoja t. , figueras f. , fernndez d. , torra j. , 2008 , a&a , 490 , 135 allard f. , hauschildt p. h. , alexander d. r. , tamanai a. , schweitzer a. , 2001 , apj , 556 , 357 allard n. f. , allard f. , hauschildt p. h. , kielkopf j. f. , machin l. , 2003 , a&a , 411 , 473 allard f. , homeier d. , freytag b. , 2011 , aspc , 448 , 91 barenfeld s. a. , bubar e. j. , mamajek e. e. , young p. a. , 2013 , apj , 766 , 6b barnes j. r. , et al . , 2013 , mnras , accepted barrado y navascus d. , stauffer j. r. , jayawardhana r. , 2004 , aj , 614 , 386 barrado y navascus d. , 2006 , a&a , 459 , 511 basri g. , laurant r. , walter f. m. , 1985 , apj , 298 , 761 basri g. , 2000 , ara&a , 38 , 485 basri g. , mohanty s. , allard f. , hauschildt p. h. , delfosse x. , martn e. l. , forveille t. , goldman b. , 2000 , apj , 538 , 363 berger e. , et al . , 2008 , apj , 676 , 1307b bovy j. , hogg d. w. , 2010 , apj , 717 , 617 burrows a. , hubbard w. b. , lunine j. i. , liebert j. , 2001 , rev . , 73 , 719 burrows a. , volobuyev m. , 2003 , apj , 583 , 985b chabrier g. , baraffe i. , 2000 , ara&a , 38 , 337 clarke j. r. a. , 2010 , phd thesis , university of hertfordshire clarke j. r. a. , et al . , 2010 , mnras , 402 , 575 ( paper i ) correia a. c. m. , couetdic j. , laskar j. , et al . 2010 , a&a , 511 , a21 cruz k. l. , reid i. n. , 2002 , aj , 123 , 2828 dahn c. c. , harris h. c. , vrba f. j. , guetter h. h. , canzian b. , henden a. a. , levine s. e. , luginbuhl c. b. et al . 2002 , aj , 124 , 1170 deacon n. r. , hambly n. c. , cooke j. a. , 2005 , a&a , 435 , 363 deacon n. r. , hambly n. c. , 2007 , a&a , 468 , 163 eggen o. j. , 1984a , aj 89 , 1358 eggen o. j. , 1984b , apjs , 55 , 597 eggen o. j. , 1989 , pasp 101 , 366 famaey b. , pont f. , luri x. , udry s. , mayor m. , jorissen a. , 2007 , a&a , 461 , 957 famaey b. , siebert , a. , jorissen a. , 2008 , a&a , 483 , 453 folkes s. l. , 2009 , phd thesis work , university of hertfordshire folkes s. l. , et al . , 2012 , mnras , 427 , 3280 francis c. , anderson e. , 2009 , rspsa , 465 , 3425 glvez - ortiz m. c. , 2005 , phd thesis , universidad complutense de madrid glvez - ortiz m. c. , et al . , 2010 , mnras , 409 , 552 ( paper ii ) gray d.f . the observation and analysis of stellar photospheres , 2005 , new york : cambrige university press gorlova n. i. , meyer m. r. , rieke g. h. , liebert j. , 2003 , apj , 593 , 1074 hauschildt p. , allard f. , 1992 , apj , 512 , 377 jenkins j. s. , ramsey l. w. , jones h. r. a. , pavlenko y. , gallardo j. , barnes j. r. , pinfield d. j. , 2009 , apj , 704 , 975 jones h. r. a. , longmore a. j. , allard f. , hauschildt p. h. , 1996 , mnras , 280 , 77 jones h. r. a. , tsuji t. , 1997 , apj , 480 , 1400 johnson d. r. h. , soderblom d. r. , 1987 , aj , 93 , 864 kirkpatrick j. d. , kelly d. m. , rieke g. h. , liebert j.,allard f. , wehrse r. , 1993 , apj , 402 , 643 kirkpatrick j. d. , henry t. j. , simons d. a. , 1995 , aj , 109 , 797 klement r. , fuchs b. , rix h. w. , 2008 , apj , 685 , 261 kupka f. , piskunov n. , ryabchikova t. a. et al . , 1999 , a&as , 138 , 119 kuznetsov m. k. , pavlenko ya . v. , glvez - ortiz m. c. , 2012 , kinematics and physics of celestial bodies ( kpcb ) journal , 28 , 280 kuznetsov m. k. , pavlenko ya . v. , glvez - ortiz m. c. , 2013 , epj web of conferences , volume 47 , 04002 lpez - santiago j. , 2005 , phd thesis , universidad complutense de madrid lpez - santiago j. , micela g. , montes d. , 2009 , a&a , 499 , 129 lyubchik yu . , pavlenko ya . , 2000 , kfnt suppl . 3 , 360 luhman k. l. , liebert j. , rieke g. h. , 1997 , apj , 489 , l165 luyten w. j. , 1978 , iau symposium no . 80 , 63 magazz a. , martn e. l. , rebolo r. , 1993 , apj , 404l , 17 marcy g. w. , butler r. p. , vogt s. s. , fischer d. a. , lissauer j. j. , 1998 , apj , 505 , l147 martn e. l. , rebolo r. , zapatero osorio m. r. , 1996 , apj , 469 , 706 martn e. l. , delfosse x. , basri g. , goldman b. , forveille t. , zapatero osorio m. r. , 1999 , aj , 118 , 2466 martn e. l. , delfosse x. , guieu s. , 2004 , aj , 127 , 449 martn e. l. , et al . , 2010 , a&a 517 , a53 martnez - arnaz r. , lpez - santiago j. , crespo - chacn i. , montes d. , 2011 , mnras , 414 , 2629 mcgovern m. r. , kirkpatrick j. d. , mclean i. s. , burgasser a. j. , prato l. , lowrance p. j. , 2004 , aj , 600 , 1020 mochnacki s. w. , et al 2002 , aj , 124 , 2868 mohanty s. , basri g. , 2003 , aj , 583 , 451 murgas f. , jenkins j. s. , rojo p. , jones h. r. a. , pinfield d. j. , a&a , 552 , 27 pavlenko ya . v. , 1997 , ap&ss , 253 , 43 pavlenko ya . v. , jones h. r. a. , martn e. l. , guenther e. , kenworthy m. a. , zapatero osorio m. r. , 2007 , mnras , 380 , 3 , 1285 pavlenko ya . v. , zhukovska s. v. , volobuev m. , 2007 , arep , 51 , 282 pinfield d. j. , jones h. r. a. , lucas p. w. , kendall t. r. , folkes s. l. , day - jones a. c. , chappelle r. j. , steele i. a. , 2006 , mnras , 368 , 1281 pizzolato n. , maggio a. , micela g. , sciortino s. & ventura p. , 2003 , a&a , 397 , 147 plez b. , 1998 , a&a , 337 , 495 pokorny r. s. , jones h. r. a. , hambly n. c. , 2003 , a&a , 397 , 575 pokorny r. s. , jones h. r. a. , hambly n. c. , pinfield d. j. , 2004 , a&a , 421 , 763 rajpurohit a. s. , reyle c. , schultheis m. , leinert c. , allard f. , 2011 , in sf2a-2011 : proceedings of the annual meeting of the french society of astronomy and astrophysics , ed . g. alecian , k. belkacem , r. samadi , d. valls - gabaud , 339 - 343 rajpurohit a. s. , reyl c. , schultheis m. , allard f. , scholz r. , homeier d. , 2012 , in sf2a-2012 : proceedings of the annual meeting of the french society of astronomy and astrophysics . s. boissier , p. de laverny , n. nardetto , r. samadi , d. valls - gabaud and h. wozniak , 383 - 388 rebolo r. , martn e. l. , magazz a. , 1992 , apj , 389l , 83 rebolo r. , martn e. l. , basri g. , marcy g. w. , zapatero - osorio m. r. , 1996 , apj , 469l , 53 reiners a. , basri g. , 2008 , aj , 684 , 1390 reiners a. , basri g. , 2010 , apj , 710 , 924 reyl c. , rajpurohit a.s . , schultheis m. , allard f. , 2011 , aspc , 448 , 929 ribas i. , 2003 , a&a , 400 , 297 rutten r. g. m. , 1987 , a&as , 177,131 ryan r. d. , neukirch t. , jardine m. , 2005 , a&a 433 , 323 schlieder j. e. , lpine s. , rice e. , simon m. , fielding d. , tomasino r , 2012 , aj , 143 , 114s schrijver c. j. , zwaan c. , 1991 , a&as 251 , 183 shanklad p. d. , rivera e. j. , laughlin g. , blank d. l. , price a. , gary b. , bissinger r. , ringwald f. , white g. , henry g. w. , mcgee p. , wolf a. s. , carter b. , lee s. , biggs j. , monard b. , ashley m. c. b. , 2006 , apj , 653 , 700 shkolnik e. , liu m. c. , reid i. n. , 2009 , apj , 699 , 649s silvestri n. m. et al . 2006 , aj , 131 , 1674 skumanich a. 1972 , apj , 491 , 856 stauffer j. r. , liebert j. , giampapa m. , 1995 , aj , 109 , 298 stauffer j. r. , balachandran s. c. , krishnamurthi a. , pinsonneault m. , terndrup d. m. , stern r. a. , 1997 , apj , 475 , 604 terndrup d. m. , stauffer j. r. , pinsonneault m. h. , sills a. , yuan y. , jones b. f. , fischer d. , krishnamurthi a. , 2000 , aj , 119 , 1303 tinney c.g . , 1998 , mnras , 296 , l42 west a. a. , et al . , 2004 , aj , 128 , 426 west a. a. , hawley s. l. , bochanski j. j. , covey k. r. , reid i. n. , dhital s. , hilton e. j. , masuda m. , 2008 , the astronomical journal , 135 , 785 west a. a. , et al . , 2011 , aj , 141 , 97 tsuji t. , ohnaka k. , aoki w. , 1996 , a&as , 305 , l1 zapatero osorio m. r. , bjar v. j. s. , pavlenko ya . , rebolo r. , allende prieto c. , martn e. l. , garca lpez r. j. , 2002 , a&a , 384 , 937 zhao j. , zhao g. , chen y. , 2009 , apj , 692l , 113 [ lastpage ] lllll name & @xmath0 ( 2000 ) & @xmath61 ( 2000 ) & @xmath79 & note + & ( h m s ) & ( @xmath65 ) & & + hyades & & & & + sips0004 - 5721 & 0 4 18.970 & -57 21 23.30 & m7.0 & also ic candidate ; kinematic + sips0027 - 5401 & 0 27 23.240 & -54 1 46.20 & m6.0 & kinematics + age features + 2mass0123 - 3610 & 1 23 0.506 & -36 10 30.67 & m4.5 & kinematics + sips0153 - 5122 & 1 53 11.430 & -51 22 24.99 & m6.0 & kinematics + age features + sips0214 - 3237 & 2 14 45.440 & -32 37 58.20 & m6.5 & kinematics + age features + sips0235 - 0711 & 2 35 49.470 & -7 11 21.90 & m6.0 & kinematics + age features + sips0440 - 0530 & 4 40 23.328 & -5 30 7.85 & m7.5 & kinematics + 2mass0600 - 3314 & 6 0 33.750 & -33 14 26.84 & m7.0@xmath80 & probable member from kinematics + 2mass0814 - 4020 & 8 14 35.46 & -40 20 49.26 & m7 - 8 & photometry + astrometry + age features + 2mass1745 - 1640 & 17 45 34.66 & -16 40 53.81 & m9-l2 & also ca and si candidate ; photometry + astrometry + age features + sips2014 - 2016 & 20 14 3.523 & -20 16 21.30 & m7.5 & kinematics + 2mass2031 - 5041 & 20 31 27.495 & -50 41 13.49 & m5.0 & kinematics + sips2049 - 1716 & 20 49 52.610 & -17 16 7.80 & m6.5 & kinematics + sips2100 - 6255 & 21 0 30.227 & -62 55 7.31 & m5.0@xmath80 & kinematics + denis2200 - 3038 & 22 0 2.022 & -30 38 32.71 & m9.0 & probable member from kinematics + sips2200 - 2756 & 22 0 16.838 & -27 56 29.70 & m6.0 & probable member from kinematics + 2mass2207 - 6917 & 22 7 10.313 & -69 17 14.25 & m6.5 & kinematics + 2mass2231 - 4443 & 22 31 8.657 & -44 43 18.43 & m4.5 & kinematics + lehpm4908 & 22 36 42.656 & -69 34 59.30 & m5.5 & kinematics + age features + 2mass2311 - 5256 & 23 11 30.330 & -52 56 30.17 & m5.5 & kinematics + sips2318 - 4919 & 23 18 45.952 & -49 19 17.79 & m6.5 & kinematics + sips2322 - 6357 & 23 22 5.332 & -63 57 57.60 & m6.5 & kinematics + sips2347 - 1821 & 23 47 16.662 & -18 21 50.60 & m6.5 & kinematics + sips2350 - 6915 & 23 50 3.948 & -69 15 24.39 & m6.5 & kinematics + lehpm6375 & 23 52 49.138 & -22 49 29.54 & m6.5 & probable member from kinematics + lehpm6542 & 23 57 54.822 & -19 55 1.89 & m6.0 & kinematics + age features + ursa major & & & & + 2mass1146 - 4754 & 11 46 51.04 & -47 54 38.17 & m7 - 8 & photometry + astrometry + age features + 2mass1236 - 6536 & 12 36 32.38 & -65 36 35.6 & m4.0 & also ca candidate ; photometry + astrometry + age features + 2mass1433 - 5148 & 14 33 41.95 & -51 48 03.70 & m6 - 7 & also ca candidate ; photometry + astrometry + age features + 2mass1618 - 3214 & 16 18 08.92 & -32 14 36.17 & m6.5 & also ca candidate ; photometry + astrometry + age features + 2mass1736 - 0407 & 17 36 56.09 & - 4 07 25.84 & m4 - 5 & also ca candidate ; photometry + astrometry + age features + 2mass1745 - 1640 & 17 45 34.66 & -16 40 53.81 & m9-l2 & also hy and ca candidate ; photometry + astrometry + age features + castor & & & & + denis0021 - 4244 & 0 21 5.896 & -42 44 43.33 & m9.5 & kinematics + age features + 2mass1236 - 6536 & 12 36 32.38 & -65 36 35.6 & m4.0 & also si candidate ; photometry + astrometry + age features + 2mass1433 - 5148 & 14 33 41.95 & -51 48 03.70 & m6 - 7 & also si candidate ; photometry + astrometry + age features + 2mass1618 - 3214 & 16 18 08.92 & -32 14 36.17 & m6.5 & also si candidate ; photometry + astrometry + age features + 2mass1736 - 0407 & 17 36 56.09 & - 4 07 25.84 & m4 - 5 & also si candidate ; photometry + astrometry + age features + 2mass1745 - 1640 & 17 45 34.66 & -16 40 53.81 & m9-l2 & also hy and si candidate ; photometry + astrometry + age features + 2mass1756 - 4518 & 17 56 29.63 & -45 18 22.47 & m8 - 9 & photomerty + astrometry + age features + 2mass1909 - 1937 & 19 09 08.21 & -19 37 47.96 & l0.0 & photometry + astrometry + sips2000 - 7523 & 20 0 48.171 & -75 23 6.58 & m8.0 & probable member from kinematics + sips2045 - 6332 & 20 45 2.278 & -63 32 5.30 & m9.0 & kinematics + age features + sips2114 - 4339 & 21 14 40.928 & -43 39 51.20 & m6.5 & kinematics + 2mass2242 - 2659 & 22 42 41.294 & -26 59 27.23 & m5.5 & also hy candidate ; kinematics + 2mass2254 - 3228 & 22 54 58.110 & -32 28 52.20 & m5.5 & kinematics + age features + pleiades & & & & + 2mass1557 - 4350 & 15 57 27.39 & -43 50 21.47 & m7.5 - 8.5 & also ic candidate ; photometry + astrometry + age features + 2mass1734 - 1151 & 17 34 30.53 & -11 51 38.83 & m9.0 & photometry + astrometry + sips2039 - 1126 & 20 39 13.081 & -11 26 52.30 & m7.0 & kinematics + age features + hb2124 - 4228 & 21 27 26.133 & -42 15 18.39 & m7.5 & kinematics + ic 2391 & & & & + sips0004 - 5721 & 0 4 18.970 & -57 21 23.30 & m7.0 & also hy candidate ; kinematics + 2mass1326 - 5022 & 13 26 53.48 & -50 22 27.04 & m7.5 & photometry + astrometry + age features + 2mass1557 - 4350 & 15 57 27.39 & -43 50 21.47 & m7.5 - 8.5 & also pl candidate ; photometry + astrometry + age features + 2mass1618 - 3214 & 16 18 08.92 & -32 14 36.17 & m6.5 & also ca and si candidate ; photometry + astrometry + age features + sips2341 - 3550 & 23 41 47.497 & -35 50 14.40 & m7.0 & kinematics + lllll name & @xmath0 ( 2000 ) & @xmath61 ( 2000 ) & @xmath79 & note + & ( h m s ) & ( @xmath65 ) & & + other young disk & & & & + sips0007 - 2458 & 0 7 7.800 & -24 58 3.80 & m7.5 & kinematics + age features + 2mass0020 - 2346 & 0 20 23.155 & -23 46 5.38 & m6.0 & kinematics + age features + sips0039 - 2256 & 0 39 23.250 & -22 56 44.90 & m7.5 & probable yd from kinematics + denis0041 - 5621 & 0 41 35.390 & -56 21 12.77 & m7.5 & kinematics + sips0054 - 4142 & 0 54 35.300 & -41 42 6.20 & m5.0 & probable yd from kinematics + sips0109 - 0343 & 1 9 51.040 & -3 43 26.30 & m9.0 & not conclusive from kinematics + lehpm1289 & 1 9 59.579 & -24 16 47.82 & m6.0 & not conclusive from kinematics + sips0115 - 2715 & 1 15 26.610 & -27 15 54.10 & m5.0 & not conclusive from kinematics + sips0126 - 1946 & 1 26 49.980 & -19 46 5.90 & m6.0 & not conclusive from kinematics + lehpm1563 & 1 27 31.956 & -31 40 3.18 & m8.5 & kinematics + sips0212 - 6049 & 2 12 33.580 & -60 49 18.40 & m6.5 & not conclusive from kinematics + 2mass0334 - 2130 & 3 34 10.657 & -21 30 34.35 & m4.5 & kinematics + age features + 2mass0429 - 3123 & 4 29 18.426 & -31 23 56.81 & m7.5 & not conclusive from kinematics + 2mass0502 - 3227 & 5 2 38.677 & -32 27 50.07 & m5.5 & not conclusive from kinematics + 2mass0528 - 5919 & 5 28 5.623 & -59 19 47.17 & m5.5 & not conclusive from kinematics + sips1039 - 4110 & 10 39 18.340 & -41 10 32.00 & m6.5@xmath80 & probable yd from kinematics + sips1124 - 2019 & 11 24 22.229 & -20 19 1.50 & m7.0@xmath80 & probable yd from kinematics + sips2049 - 1944 & 20 49 19.673 & -19 44 31.30 & m7.0 & kinematics + sips2128 - 3254 & 21 28 17.402 & -32 54 3.90 & m6.5 & kinematics + sips2321 - 6106 & 23 21 43.418 & -61 6 35.37 & m5.0 & kinematics + sips2343 - 2947 & 23 43 34.731 & -29 47 9.50 & m8.0 & kinematics + old disk & & & & + 2mass0204 - 3945 & 2 4 18.036 & -39 45 6.48 & m7.0 & not conclusive from kinematics + 2mass0445 - 5321 & 4 45 43.368 & -53 21 34.56 & m7.5@xmath80 & kinematics + denis1250 - 2121 & 12 50 52.654 & -21 21 13.67 & m7.5 & kinematics + sips1329 - 4147 & 13 29 0.872 & -41 47 11.90 & m9.5@xmath80 & kinematics + sips1341 - 3052 & 13 41 11.561 & -30 52 49.60 & l0@xmath80 & kinematics + 2mass1507 - 2000 & 15 7 27.799 & -20 0 43.18 & m7.5 & kinematics + sips1632 - 0631 & 16 32 58.799 & -6 31 45.30 & m8.5 & kinematics + sips1758 - 6811 & 17 58 59.663 & -68 11 10.50 & m5.0 & probable od from kinematics + sips1949 - 7136 & 19 49 45.527 & -71 36 50.89 & m7.0 & kinematics + 2mass2001 - 5949 & 20 1 24.639 & -59 49 0.09 & m6.0 & probable od from kinematics + 2mass2106 - 4044 & 21 6 20.896 & -40 44 51.91 & m6.0 & probable od from kinematics + sips2119 - 0740 & 21 19 17.571 & -7 40 52.50 & m7.0 & probable od from kinematics + lehpm4480 & 22 15 10.151 & -67 38 49.07 & m5.5 & probable od from kinematics + 2mass2222 - 4919 & 22 22 3.684 & -49 19 23.45 & m6.5 & kinematics + Abstract:

Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.

Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered . Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video . Paper: the study of spectra of graphs associated with finitely generated groups , such as cayley graphs or schreier graphs ( natural analogues of cayley graphs associated to not necessarily free group actions ) has a long history and is related to many problems in modern mathematics . still , very little is known about the dependence of the spectrum of the laplacian on the choice of generators in the group and on the weight on these generators . in the recent paper @xcite we addressed the issue of dependence on the weights on generators in the example of grigorchuk s group of intermediate growth . more specifically , we determined the spectral type of the laplacian on the schreier graphs describing the action of grigorchuk s group on the boundary of the infinite binary tree and showed that it is different in the isotropic and anisotropic cases . in fact , the spectrum is shown to be a cantor set of lebesgue measure zero in the anisotropic case , whereas , as has been known for a long time , it consists of one or two intervals in the isotropic case . moreover , we showed almost surely ( with respect to a natural measure on the boundary of the tree ) the absence of eigenvalues for the laplacians in question . our investigation in @xcite provides ( and relies on ) a surprising link between discrete schrdinger operators with aperiodic order and the substitutional dynamics arising from a presentation of the group by generators and relators . the purpose of the present paper is two - fold . firstly , we want to survey the spectral theoretic results of @xcite . secondly , we want to put these results in wider perspective by discussing the background on aperiodic order in dimension one . in this context we present a discussion of subshifts and aperiodic order in section [ section - subshifts ] and of schrdinger operators arising in models of ( dis)ordered solids in section [ schroedinger ] . we also continue our study of the substitution that is instrumental for the results in @xcite . it first appeared in 1985 in the presentation of grigorchuk s group by generators and relators found by lysenok @xcite ( such infinite recursive presentations are now called l - presentations ) . a remarkable fact is that the same substitution also describes basic dynamical properties of the group . here we review its combinatorial properties and carry out a detailed study of the factor map to its maximal equicontinuous factor , which is the binary odometer . this factor map is proven to be one - to - one everywhere except on three orbits . this in turn can be linked to the phenomenon of pure point diffraction which is at the core of aperiodic order . all these discussions concerning the substitution are contained in section [ the - substitution ] . the necessary background from graphs and dynamical systems is discussed in section [ section - background - graphs - etc ] and basics on grigorchuk s group and its schreier graphs can be found in section [ grigorchuk ] . the connection between schrdinger operators and laplacians on schreier graphs revealed in @xcite ( and reviewed in sections [ connecting ] and [ section - spectral ] ) can also be used to show that the kesten - von - neuman trace and the integrated density of states agree . this seems to be somewhat folklore . we provide a proof in section [ ids - schreier ] . our approach can certainly be carried out for various further families of groups generalizing grigorchuk s group . in particular , our results fully extend to a larger family of self - similar groups acting on the infinite binary tree considered by sunic in @xcite , as well as to similar families of self - similar groups acting on regular rooted trees of arbitrary degrees that also have linear schreier graphs for their action on the boundary of the tree . moreover , each of these self - similar groups belongs to an uncountable family of groups parametrized by sequences in a certain finite alphabet , in the same way as grigorchuk s group belongs to the family of groups @xmath0 constructed by the first named author in @xcite . the schreier graphs of the groups in the same family look the same , but their labelling by generators , and thus their spectra , depend on the sequence @xmath1 . the associated subshifts are also different , in particular , they do nt have to come from a substitution in the case when the corresponding group is not self - similar . this more general setup will be considered in a separate paper . * acknowledgments . * r. g. was partially supported by the nsf grant dms-1207669 , by erc ag compasp and by the nsa grant h98230 - 15 - 1 - 0328 . the authors acknowledge support of the swiss national science foundation . part of this research was carried out while d.l . and r. g. were visiting the department of mathematics of the university of geneva . the hospitality of the department is gratefully acknowledged . the authors also thank fabien durand and ian putnam for most enlightening discussions concerning the material gathered in section [ section - recoding ] , yaroslav vorobets for allowing them to use his figures @xmath2 and @xmath3 and olga klimecki for help in preparing figure @xmath4 . finally , the authors would like to thank the anonymous referee for a very careful reading of the manuscript and several helpful suggestions . long range aperiodic order ( or aperiodic order for short ) denotes an intermediate regime of order between periodicity and randomness . it has received a lot of attention over the last thirty years or so , see e.g. the article collections and monographs @xcite . this interest in aperiodic order has various reasons . on the one hand it is due to the many remarkable and previously unknown features and phenomena arising from aperiodic order in various branches of mathematics . on the other hand , it is also due to the relevance of aperiodic order in physics and chemistry . indeed , aperiodic order provides a mathematical theory for the description of a new type of matter discovered in 1982 by shechtman via diffraction experiments @xcite . these experiments showed sharp peaks in the diffraction pattern indicating long range order and at the same time a five fold symmetry indicating absence of periodicity . the discovery of solids combining both long range order with aperiodicity came as a complete surprise to physicists and chemists and shechtman was honored with a nobel prize in 2011 . by now , the solids in question are known as quasicrystals . in one dimension aperiodic order is commonly modeled by subshifts of low complexity . in higher dimensions it is modeled by dynamical systems consisting of point sets with suitable regularity features ( which are known as delone dynamical systems ) . here , we present the necessary notation in order to deal with the one - dimensional situation . * when we speak about aperiodic order subsequently , this will always mean that we have a subshift with suitable minimality features at our disposal . * let a finite set @xmath5 be given . we call @xmath5 the _ alphabet _ and refer to its elements as _ letters_. we will consider the set @xmath6 of finite words ( including the empty word ) over the alphabet @xmath5 , viewed as a free monoid ( with the multiplication given by concatenation of words and the empty word representing the identity ) . elements of @xmath6 will often be written as @xmath7 with @xmath8 . the length of a word is the number of its letters . it will be denoted by @xmath9 . the empty word has length zero . then , @xmath10 denotes the set of functions from @xmath11 to @xmath5 . we think of the elements of @xmath10 as of bi - infinite words over the alphabet @xmath5 . the set @xmath12 denotes the set of functions from @xmath13 to @xmath5 . we think of its elements of one - sided infinite words over @xmath5 . they will often be denoted by @xmath14 . if @xmath15 are finite words and @xmath16 satisfies @xmath17 we write @xmath18 and say that @xmath19 _ denotes the position of the origin_. we equip @xmath5 with the discrete topology and @xmath20 with the product topology . by the tychonoff theorem , @xmath10 is then compact . in fact , it is homeomorphic to the cantor set . a pair @xmath21 is called a _ subshift _ over @xmath5 if @xmath22 is a closed subset of @xmath20 which is invariant under the _ shift transformation _ @xmath23 if there exists a natural number @xmath24 with @xmath25 for all @xmath26 then @xmath21 is called _ periodic _ otherwise it is called _ non - periodic_. whenever @xmath1 is a word over @xmath5 ( finite or infinite , indexed by @xmath13 or by @xmath11 ) we define @xmath27 by convention , the set of finite subwords includes the empty word . every subshift @xmath28 comes naturally with the set @xmath29 of associated finite words given by @xmath30 a word @xmath31 is said to _ occur with bounded gaps _ if there exists an @xmath32 such that every @xmath33 with @xmath34 contains a copy of @xmath35 . as is well known ( and not hard to see ) @xmath28 is minimal if and only if every @xmath36 occurs with bounded gaps . for proofs and further discussion we refer to standard textbooks such as @xcite . we will be concerned here with the following strengthening of the bounded gaps condition . it concerns the case that @xmath37 can be chosen as @xmath38 with fixed @xmath39 ( independent of @xmath35 ) . a subshift @xmath21 is called _ linearly repetitive _ ( lr ) , if there exists a constant @xmath40 such that any word @xmath41 occurs in any word @xmath42 of length at least @xmath38 . this notion has been discussed under various names by various people . in particular it was studied by durand , host and skau @xcite in the setting of subshifts ( under the name linearly recurrent ) . for delone dynamical systems it was brought forward at about the same time by lagarias and pleasants @xcite under the name linearly repetitive. it has also featured in the work of boris solomyak @xcite ( under the name uniformly repetitive ) . it was also already discussed in an unpublished work of boshernitzan in the 90s . that work also contains a characterization in terms of positivity of weights . a corresponding result for delone systems was recently given in @xcite . durand @xcite gives a characterization of such subshifts in terms of primitive @xmath43-adic systems and shows the following ( which was already known to boshernitzan ) . [ theorem - unique - ergodicity ] let @xmath21 be a linearly repetitive subshift . then , the subshift is uniquely ergodic . in fact , linear repetitivity implies a strong form of subadditive ergodic theorem @xcite . validity of such a result together with the fundamental work of kotani @xcite is at the core of the approach to cantor spectrum of lebesgue measure zero developed in @xcite . our considerations on cantor spectrum rely on an extension of that approach worked out in @xcite . in this section , we present ( parts of ) the spectral theory of discrete schrdinger operators associated to minimal dynamical systems . schrdinger operators occupy a prominent position in the theory of aperiodic order . indeed , they arise in the quantum mechanical description of conductance properties of quasicrystals and exhibit quite interesting mathematical properties . in fact , already the first two papers on them written by physicists suggest that the corresponding spectral measures are purely singular continuous and the spectrum is a cantor set of lebesgue measure zero @xcite . by now these features as well as other conductance - related properties known as anomalous transport have been thoroughly studied in a variety of models by various authors , see the survey articles @xcite . the phenomenon that the underlying spectrum is a cantor set of lebesgue measure zero is usually referred to as _ cantor spectrum of lebesgue measure zero _ and this is how we will refer to it subsequently . the laplacians on schreier graphs discussed later will turn out to be unitarily equivalent to certain such schrdinger operators . subsequently , we first discuss basic mathematical features of schrdinger operators associated to dynamical systems in the next section [ basic - schroedinger ] , then turn to absolutely continuous spectrum and the spectrum as a set for subshifts in section [ spectrum - set - ac ] and finally give some background from physics in section [ aperiodic - order - schroedinger ] . in this section we review some basic theory of discrete schrdinger operators ( or rather jacobi matrices ) associated to minimal topological dynamical systems . this framework is slightly more general than the framework of minimal subshifts . the results we discuss include constancy of the spectrum and uniform convergence of the so - called integrated density of states . all these results are well known . whenever @xmath44 is a homeomorphism of the compact space @xmath22 we will refer to @xmath21 as a _ topological dynamical system_. later we will meet an even more general definition of dynamical system . to continuous functions @xmath45 we then associate a family of _ discrete operators _ @xmath46 . specifically , for each @xmath47 , @xmath48 is a bounded selfadjoint operator from @xmath49 to @xmath49 acting via @xmath50 for @xmath51 and @xmath52 . in the case @xmath53 the above operators are known as _ discrete schrdinger operators_. for general @xmath54 the name _ jacobi matrices _ is often used in the literature . here , we will deal with the case @xmath55 but still mostly refer to the arising operators as schrdinger operators . as the operator @xmath48 is selfadjoint , the operator @xmath56 is bijective with continuous inverse @xmath57 for any @xmath58 . moreover , for any @xmath59 there exists a unique positive borel measure @xmath60 on @xmath61 with @xmath62 for any @xmath58 . this measure if finite and assigns the value @xmath63 to the set @xmath61 . for fixed @xmath64 , the measures @xmath60 , @xmath65 , are called the _ spectral measures _ of @xmath48 . the spectrum of @xmath48 is defined as @xmath66 it is the smallest set containing the support of any @xmath60 ( see e.g. @xcite ) . the spectrum is said to be _ purely absolutely continuous _ if the spectral measures for all @xmath67 are absolutely continuous with respect to lebesgue measure . the spectrum is said to be _ purely singular continuous _ if all spectral measures are both continuous ( i.e. do not have discrete parts ) and singular with respect to lebesgue measure . the following result is well - known . it can be found in various places , see e.g. @xcite . recall that @xmath21 is called _ minimal _ if @xmath68 is dense in @xmath22 for any @xmath47 . [ constancy]let @xmath21 be minimal and @xmath69 continuous . then , there exists a closed subset @xmath70 such that the spectrum @xmath71 of @xmath48 equals @xmath72 for any @xmath64 . we will refer to the set @xmath72 in the previous theorem as the _ spectrum of the schrdinger operator associated to @xmath21 ( and ( f , g))_. the spectrum @xmath72 is a one of the main objects of interest in our study . before turning to a finer analysis of the spectrum we will introduce a further quantity of interest the so called integrated density of states . in order to do so , we will assume that the underlying dynamical system @xmath21 is not only minimal but also _ uniquely ergodic _ i.e. possesses a unique invariant probability measure , which we call @xmath73 . then , we can associate to the family @xmath74 the positive measure @xmath75 on @xmath61 defined via @xmath76 ( for @xmath77 any continuous function on @xmath61 with compact support ) . here , @xmath78 is just the characteristic function of @xmath79 . this measure @xmath75 is called the _ integrated density of states_. let @xmath80 , n(e):=\int_{(-\infty , e ] } d k,\ ] ] be the distribution function of @xmath75 . there is a direct relation between the measure @xmath75 and the spectrum of the @xmath48 . [ theorem - support - and - atomfree ] let @xmath21 be minimal and uniquely ergodic . then , the set @xmath72 is the support of the measure @xmath75 . if the function @xmath54 does not vanish anywhere then @xmath75 does not have atoms ( i.e. it assigns the value zero to any set containing only one element ) . this is rather standard in the theory of random operators . specific variants of it can be found in many places . in particular , the first statement of the theorem can be found in @xcite . in the case of @xmath54 which do not vanish anywhere the statements of the theorem are contained in section 5 of @xcite . given the constancy of the spectrum , theorem [ constancy ] , the statements are also very special cases of the results of section 5 of @xcite . the key ingredient for the absence of atoms is amenability of the underlying group @xmath11 . the statement on the support does not even need this property . as is well known , it is possible to calculate @xmath75 via an approximation procedure . this will be discussed next . for @xmath81 let @xmath82 be the canonical inclusion and let @xmath83 be the adjoint of @xmath84 . thus , @xmath85 is the canonical projection . define for @xmath64 then @xmath86 we will be concerned with the spectral theory of these operators . let the measure @xmath87 on @xmath61 be defined as @xmath88 ( for any continuous @xmath77 on @xmath61 with compact support ) and let @xmath89,\ : n_\omega^{n } ( e):=\int_{(\infty , e ] } d k_\omega^{n } ( x),\ ] ] be its distribution function . let @xmath90 be the eigenvalues of @xmath91 counted with multiplicity . then , straightforward linear algebra ( diagonalization of @xmath91 and independence of the trace of the chosen orthonormal basis ) shows that @xmath92 holds for any continuous @xmath77 on @xmath61 with compact support and that the distribution functions of the measures @xmath93 are given by @xmath94 where @xmath95 denotes the cardinality of a set . in this sense , @xmath87 is just an averaged eigenvalue counting . [ theorem - convergence - ids ] let @xmath21 be minimal and uniquely ergodic . then , for any continuous @xmath77 on @xmath61 with compact support and any @xmath96 there exists an @xmath97 with @xmath98 for all @xmath64 and all @xmath52 with @xmath99 . it is well - known that the measures @xmath100 converge weakly toward @xmath75 for @xmath101 for almost every @xmath64 . this can be found in many places , see e.g. lemma 5.12 in @xcite . ( that lemma assumes that @xmath54 does not vanish anywhere but its proof does not use this assumption . ) a key step in the proof is the use of the birkhoff ergodic theorem . the desired statement now follows by replacing the birkhoff ergodic theorem with the uniform ergodic theorem ( oxtoby theorem ) valid for uniquely ergodic systems @xcite . the operators @xmath91 are sometimes thought of as arising out of the @xmath48 by some form of dirichlet boundary condition. the previous result is stable under taking different boundary conditions. in fact , even a more general statement is true as we will discuss next . ( the more general statement will even save us from saying what we mean by boundary condition . ) let for any @xmath102 and @xmath103 be a selfadjoint operator @xmath104 on @xmath105 be given . then , the statement of the theorem essentially continues to hold if the operators @xmath91 are replaced by the operators @xmath106 provided the rank of the @xmath107 is not too big . here , the rank of an operator @xmath39 on a finite dimensional space , denoted by @xmath108 , is just the dimension of the range of @xmath39 . in order to be more specific , we introduce the measure @xmath109 on @xmath61 defined as @xmath110 ( for any continuous @xmath77 on @xmath61 with compact support ) and its distribution function given by @xmath111,\ ; \widetilde{n}_\omega^{n } ( e):= \frac{1}{n } \sharp\{\mbox{eigenvalues of $ \widetilde{h}_\omega^{n}$ not exceeding $ e$ } \}.\ ] ] [ perturbation - ids ] consider the situation just described . let @xmath64 be given with @xmath112 then , for any continuous @xmath77 on @xmath61 with compact support and any @xmath96 there exists an @xmath97 with @xmath113 for all @xmath99 . a consequence of the min - max principle , see e.g. theorem 4.3.6 in @xcite shows @xmath114 independent of @xmath115 . this directly gives the desired statement . the theorem allows one to obtain an inclusion formula for the spectrum @xmath72 . denote the spectrum of the operator @xmath116 by @xmath117 . by construction , @xmath117 is just the support of the measure @xmath109 . [ cor - inclusion ] assume the situation of the previous theorem . then , the inclusion @xmath118 holds for all @xmath119 . the corollary is somewhat unsatisfactory in that it only gives an inclusion . in certain cases more is known . this is further discussed in section [ ids - equal - kvns - trace ] . for a general result on how to construct approximations whose spectra converge with respect to the hausdorff distance we refer the reader to @xcite . in this section we consider schrdinger operators associated to locally constant functions on minimal subhifts . here , a function @xmath120 on a subshift @xmath22 over a finite alphabet is _ locally constant _ if there exists an @xmath121 such that the value of @xmath122 only depends on the word @xmath123 . a key distinction in our considerations will then be whether @xmath124 is periodic or not . the overall structure of the spectrum in the periodic case is well - known . this can be found in many references , see e.g. the monograph @xcite . [ theorem - periodic - abstract ] let @xmath21 be a minimal subshift and @xmath69 locally constant with @xmath125 for all @xmath26 . if @xmath124 is periodic ( with period @xmath126 ) , then the spectra @xmath72 of the associated schrdinger operators consist of finitely many ( and not more than @xmath126 ) closed intervals of positive length and all spectral measures are absolutely continuous with respect to lebesgue measure . note that periodicity of @xmath124 may have its origin in both properties of @xmath21 and properties of @xmath124 . for example periodicity always occurs if @xmath127 irrespective of the nature of @xmath21 . also , periodicity occurs for arbitrary @xmath128 if @xmath21 is periodic ( i.e. there exists a natural number @xmath129 with @xmath130 for all @xmath64 ) . the previous theorem gives rather complete information on @xmath72 in the periodic case . in order to deal with the non - periodic case , we will need a further assumption on @xmath21 . this condition is linear repetitivity . [ theorem - aperiodic - abstract ] let @xmath21 be a linearly repetitive subshift and @xmath69 locally constant with @xmath125 for all @xmath26 . if @xmath124 is non - periodic , then there exists a cantor set @xmath72 of lebesgue measure zero in @xmath61 such that @xmath131 for all @xmath103 . the above theorem was first proven in @xcite in the case @xmath53 . this result was then extended in @xcite from linearly repetitive subshifts to arbitrary subshifts satisfying a certain condition known as boshernitzan condition ( b ) ( again for the case @xmath132 ) . in the form stated above it can be inferred from the recent work @xcite , corollary 4 . this corollary treats the even more general situation , where condition ( b ) is satisfied . condition ( b ) was introduced by boshernitzan as a sufficient condition for unique ergodicity @xcite ( see @xcite for an alternative approach as well ) . in our context , we do not actually need its definition here . it suffices to know that linear repetitivity implies ( b ) ( see e.g. @xcite ) . the previous result deals with the appearance of @xmath72 as a set . it also gives some information on the spectral type . [ corollary - aperiodic - abstract ] assume the situation of the previous theorem . then , no spectral measure can be absolutely continuous with respect to the lebesgue measure . schrdinger operators with aperiodic order can be considered within the context of random schrdinger operators . indeed , they arise in quantum mechanical treatment of solids . as this may be revealing we briefly present this context in this section . further discussion and references can be found e.g. in the textbooks @xcite . consider a subshift @xmath21 over the finite alphabet @xmath5 . assume without loss of generality that @xmath5 is a subset of the real numbers . let a @xmath44-invariant probability measure @xmath133 on @xmath22 be given . to these data we can associate the family @xmath134 of bounded selfadjoint operators on @xmath49 acting via @xmath135 such operators are ( slightly special ) cases of the operators considered in the previous section . they arise in the quantum mechanical treatment of disordered solids . the solid in question is modeled by the sequence @xmath26 . the operator @xmath48 then describes the behavior of one electron under the influence of this @xmath1 . more specifically , if the state of the electron is @xmath136 at time @xmath137 then the time evolution is governed by the _ schrdinger equation _ @xmath138 this equation has a unique solution given by @xmath139 the behavior of this solution is then linked to the spectral properties of @xmath48 . the two basic pieces of philosophy underlying the investigations are now the following : * increasing regularity of the spectral measures increases the conductance properties of the solid in question . * the more disordered the subshift is the more singular the spectral measures are . of course , this has to be taken with ( more than ) a grain of salt . in particular , precise meaning has to be given to what is meant by _ regularity and singularity of the spectral measures _ and _ conductance properties _ and _ disorder in the subshift_. a large part of the theory is then devoted to giving precise sense to these concepts and then prove ( or disprove ) specific formulations of the mentioned two pieces of philosophy . regarding the first point of the philosophy we mention @xcite as basic references for proofs of lower bounds on transport via quantitative continuity of the spectral measures . as for the second point of the philosophy , the two - in some sense - most extremal cases are given by periodic subshifts representing the maximally ordered case on the one hand and the bernoulli subshift ( with uniform measure ) on the other hand representing the maximally disordered case . the periodic situation can be thought of as one with maximal order . as discussed in the previous section the spectral measures are all absolutely continuous ( hence not at all singular ) and the spectrum consists of non - trivial intervals . these intervals are known in the physics literature as ( conductance ) bands . the bernoulli subshift can be thought of as having maximal disorder . in this case all spectral measures turn out to be pure point measures and the spectrum is pure point spectrum with the eigenvalues densely filling suitable intervals . we refer to the monographs @xcite for details and further references . the subshifts considered in the previous section are characterized by some intermediate form of disorder . they are not periodic . however , they are still minimal and uniquely ergodic and have very low complexity . so they are close to the periodic situation ( or rather well approximable by periodic models with bigger and bigger periods ) . accordingly , one can expect the following spectral features of the associated schrdinger operators : * absence of absolutely continuous spectral measures ( due to the presence of disorder i.e. the lack of periodicity ) . * absence of point spectrum ( due to the closeness to the periodic case ) . * cantor spectrum of lebesgue measure zero ( as a consequence of approximation by periodic models with bigger and bigger periods and , hence , more and more gaps ) . indeed , a large part of the theory for schrdinger operators with aperiodic order is devoted to proving these features ( as well as more subtle properties ) for specific classes of models . further details and references can be found in the surveys @xcite . here , we emphasize that also our discussion of the operators associated to a certain substitution generated subshift below will be focused on establishing the above features . in this section we study the two - sided subshift @xmath143 induced by a particular substitution @xmath140 on @xmath144 with @xmath145 the one - sided subshift induced by this substitution had already been studied by vorobets @xcite . some of our results can be seen as providing the two - sided counterparts to his investigations . the key ingredient in the investigations of @xcite is that the arising one - sided sequences can be considered as toeplitz sequences . this is equally true in our case of two - sided sequences . thus , it seems very likely that one could also base our analysis of the corresponding features on the connection to toeplitz sequenes . here , we will present a different approach based the @xmath146-decomposition and @xmath146-partition introduced in @xcite . the subshift @xmath142 will be of crucial importance for us as it will turn out that the schrdinger operators associated to it are unitarily equivalent to the laplacians on the schreier graphs of the grigorchuk s group @xmath147 . while we do not use it in the sequel we would like to highlight that the substitution in question has already earlier appeared in the study of grigorchuk s group @xmath147 . indeed , it is ( a version of ) the substitution used by lysenok @xcite for getting a presentation of grigorchuk s group @xmath147 . more specifically , @xcite gives that @xmath148 where @xmath149 is the substitution on @xmath150 obtained from @xmath140 by replacing @xmath151 by @xmath152 , @xmath153 by @xmath154 and @xmath155 by @xmath156 . let the alphabet @xmath144 be given and let @xmath140 be the substitution mentioned above mapping @xmath157 , @xmath158 , @xmath159 , @xmath160 . let @xmath141 be the associated set of words given by @xmath161 then , the following three properties obviously hold true : * the letter @xmath162 is a prefix of @xmath163 for any @xmath164 . * the lengths @xmath165 converge to @xmath166 for @xmath167 . * any letter of @xmath5 occurs in @xmath168 for some @xmath146 . by the first two properties @xmath163 is a prefix of @xmath169 for any @xmath170 . thus , there exists a unique one - sided infinite word @xmath171 such that @xmath163 is a prefix of @xmath171 for any @xmath170 . this @xmath171 is then a fixed point of @xmath140 i.e. @xmath172 . we will refer to it as _ the fixed point of the substitution @xmath140_. clearly , @xmath171 is then a fixed point of @xmath173 as well for any natural number @xmath146 . by the third property we then have @xmath174 we can now associate to @xmath140 the subshift @xmath175 note that every other letter of @xmath171 is an @xmath162 ( as can easily be seen ) . thus , @xmath162 occurs in @xmath171 with bounded gaps . this implies that any word of @xmath141 occurs with bounded gaps ( as the word is a subword of @xmath163 and @xmath171 is a fixed point of @xmath173 ) . for this reason @xmath142 is minimal and @xmath176 holds for any @xmath177 . we can then apply theorem 1 of @xcite to obtain the following . [ theorem - tau - linear - repetitive ] the subshift @xmath142 is linearly repetitive . in particular , @xmath142 is uniquely ergodic and minimal . it is well - known that subshifts associated to primitive substitutions are linearly repetitive ( see e.g. @xcite ) . theorem 1 of @xcite shows that linear repetitivity in fact holds for subshifts associated to any substitution provided minimality holds . unique ergodicity is then a direct consequence of linear repetitivity due to theorem [ theorem - unique - ergodicity ] . our further considerations will be based on a more careful study of the @xmath163 . we set @xmath178 a direct calculation gives @xmath179 thus , the following _ recursion formula _ for the @xmath180 @xmath181 with @xmath182 is valid[recursion ] . this recursion formula is a very powerful tool . this will become clear in the subsequent sections . here we first note that it implies @xmath183 for all @xmath184 . we will now use it to present a formula for the occurrences of the @xmath185 in @xmath171 and to introduce some special elements in @xmath186 . consider the fixed point @xmath187 of @xmath188 on @xmath10 . then the following holds . * the letter @xmath162 occurs exactly at the positions @xmath189 , @xmath190 ( i.e. at the odd positions ) . * the letter @xmath151 occurs exactly at the positions of the form @xmath191 , @xmath192 ( i.e. at the positions of the form @xmath193 with @xmath194 an odd integer and @xmath164 arbitrary ) . * the letter @xmath153 occurs exactly at the positions of the form @xmath195 , @xmath192 ( i.e. at the positions of the form @xmath196 with @xmath194 an odd integer and @xmath164 arbitrary ) . * the letter @xmath155 occurs exactly at the positions of the form @xmath197 , @xmath192 ( i.e. at the positions of the form @xmath198 with @xmath194 an odd integer and @xmath164 arbitrary ) . we first note that the given sets of positions are pairwise disjoint and cover @xmath13 . thus , it suffices to show that the mentioned letters occur at these positions . the statement for @xmath162 is clear . the statements for @xmath185 can all be proven similarly . thus , we only discuss the statement for @xmath151 . repeated application of ( rf ) shows that @xmath199 with @xmath200 . moreover , ( rf ) implies @xmath201 combining these formula we see that @xmath151 must occur at all positions of the form @xmath202 this finishes the proof . the previous proposition shows that @xmath171 is a _ toeplitz sequence _ ( with periods of the form @xmath203 for @xmath204 ) . as mentioned already the analysis of the one - sided subshift in @xcite is based on this property . we now head further to use ( rf ) to introduce some special two - sided sequences . as is not hard to see from ( rf ) , for any @xmath164 and any single letter @xmath205 the word @xmath206 occurs in @xmath171 . thus , for any @xmath205 there exists a unique element @xmath207 such that @xmath208 holds for all natural numbers @xmath146 , where the @xmath19 denotes the position of the origin . the elements @xmath209 will play an important role in our subsequent analysis . they clearly have the property that they agree on @xmath13 with @xmath171 . indeed , they can be shown to be exactly those elements of @xmath186 which agree with @xmath171 on @xmath13 ( see below ) . here , we already note that these three sequences are different . thus , @xmath186 contains different sequences , which agree on @xmath13 . hence , @xmath22 is not periodic . we finish this section by noting a certain reflection invariance of our system . recall that a non - empty word @xmath210 with @xmath8 is called a _ palindrome _ if @xmath211 . an easy induction using ( rf ) shows that for any @xmath212 the word @xmath180 is a palindrome . it starts and ends with @xmath213 for any @xmath190 with @xmath214 . as each @xmath180 is a palindrome and any word belonging to @xmath141 is a subword of some @xmath180 we immediately infer that @xmath141 is closed under reflections in the sense that the following proposition holds . [ prop - palindrome ] whenever @xmath215 with @xmath8 belongs to @xmath141 then so does @xmath216 . as a direct consequence of the definitions we obtain that for any @xmath170 the word @xmath171 has a ( unique ) decomposition as @xmath217 with @xmath218 . clearly , this decomposition can be thought of as a way of writing @xmath171 with letters from the alphabet @xmath219 . moreover , setting @xmath220 we have @xmath221 for any @xmath222 . this way of writing @xmath171 will be called the _ @xmath146-decomposition of @xmath171_. it turns out that an analogous decomposition can actually be given for any element @xmath223 . this will be discussed in this section . specifically , we will discuss next that each @xmath224 admits for each @xmath170 a unique decomposition of the form @xmath225 with * @xmath226 for all @xmath227 , * the origin @xmath228 belongs to @xmath229 . such a decomposition will be referred to as _ @xmath146-decomposition _ of @xmath1 . a short moment s thought reveals that if such a decomposition exists at all , then it is uniquely determined by the position of any of the @xmath230 s in @xmath1 . moreover , the positions of the @xmath230 s are given by @xmath231 with @xmath232 . thus , the positions are given by an element of @xmath233 . this suggests the following definition . for @xmath212 we call an element @xmath234 an @xmath235 of @xmath223 if for any @xmath236 both * @xmath237 and * @xmath238 hold . clearly , for each @xmath239 , existence ( uniqueness ) of an @xmath146-partition is equivalent to existence ( uniqueness ) of an @xmath146-decomposition . in this sense these two concepts are equivalent . it is not apparent that such an @xmath146-partition exists at all . here is our corresponding result . [ theorem - n - partition ] let @xmath170 be given . then any @xmath223 admits a unique @xmath146-partition @xmath240 and the map @xmath241 is continuous and equivariant ( i.e. @xmath242 ) . based on n - partitions ( and n - decompositions ) and the previous theorem one can then study the dynamical system @xmath142 as well as various questions on the structure of @xmath141 . this is the content of the next sections . in this section we use n - partitions to study the structure of the dynamical system @xmath142 . for any @xmath243 we can consider the cyclic group @xmath244 together with the map @xmath245 , called _ addition map _ , which sends @xmath246 to @xmath247 . then , @xmath248 is a periodic minimal dynamical system . moreover , there are natural maps @xmath249 for any @xmath250 . these maps allow one to construct the topological abelian group @xmath251 as the inverse limit of the system @xmath252 , @xmath243 . specifically , the elements of @xmath251 are sequences @xmath253 with @xmath254 and @xmath255 for all @xmath243 . this group is called the _ group of dyadic integers_. the addition maps @xmath245 are compatible with the inverse limit and lift to a map @xmath256 on @xmath251 ( which is just addition by @xmath4 on each member of the sequence in question ) . in this way , we obtain a dynamical system @xmath257 . it is known as the _ binary odometer_. as @xmath256 is just addition one can think of this system as an adding machine. it is well known that this dynamical system is minimal . now theorem [ theorem - n - partition ] can be rephrased as saying that the dynamical system @xmath258 is a factor of @xmath142 via the factor map @xmath259 . clearly , the factor maps @xmath259 are compatible with the natural canonical projections @xmath260 in the sense that @xmath261 holds for all @xmath262 . thus , we can combine the @xmath259 for all @xmath263 to get a factor map @xmath264 we first use this to study continuous eigenvalues . let @xmath265 be a dynamical system ( i.e. @xmath266 is a compact space and @xmath267 is a homeomorphism ) . denote the unit circle in @xmath268 by @xmath269 . then , @xmath270 is called a _ continuous eigenvalue _ of the dynamical system @xmath265 if there exists a continuous not everywhere vanishing function @xmath54 with values in @xmath268 on @xmath266 satisfying @xmath271 for all @xmath272 . such a function is called a _ continuous eigenfunction_. then , any continuous eigenvalue belongs to @xmath269 and the continuous eigenvalues form a group under multiplication whenever the underlying dynamical system is minimal . indeed , by minimality any continuous eigenfunction has constant ( non - vanishing ) modulus . then , the product of two eigenfunctions is an eigenfunction to the product of the corresponding eigenvalues . the complex conjugate of an eigenfunction is an eigenfunction to the inverse of the corresponding eigenvalue and the constant function is an eigenfunction to the eigenvalue @xmath4 . moreover , it is not hard to see that minimality implies that the multiplicity of each continuous eigenvalue is one ( i.e. for any two continuous eigenfunctions @xmath128 to the same eigenvalue there exists a complex number c with @xmath273 ) . let now @xmath274 be the group of continuous eigenvalues of @xmath275 . this is just the subgroup of @xmath269 given by @xmath276 . then , clearly the groups @xmath274 and @xmath275 are dual to each other via @xmath277 the dual maps to the canonical projections @xmath278 are then the canonical embeddings @xmath279 thus , @xmath274 is a subgroup of @xmath280 . let @xmath281 be the group arising as the union of the @xmath282 , i.e. @xmath283 this group is often denoted as @xmath284 . equip it with the discrete topology and denote its pontryagin dual @xmath285 by @xmath286 . [ prop - canonical - isom ] the group @xmath286 is canonically isomorphic to the group @xmath251 via @xmath287 by construction @xmath251 comes about as inverse limit of the @xmath252 , @xmath262 . then , the dual group of @xmath251 arises as the direct limit of the dual system @xmath288 . this limit is just the group @xmath281 . dualising once more we obtain that @xmath286 is indeed canonically isomorphic to the dual of @xmath251 . to obtain the actual formula we can proceed as follows : define @xmath289 . then , each @xmath290 is a complex primitive @xmath291-th root of @xmath4 with @xmath292 . now , consider an arbitrary element @xmath293 i.e. a character @xmath294 . then , @xmath295 is completely determined by its values on the @xmath290 , @xmath296 . moreover , for each @xmath146 we have @xmath297 for a unique @xmath298 as @xmath299 it is not hard to see that @xmath300 goes to @xmath301 under the natural surjection @xmath302 . thus , to each character @xmath303 there corresponds a sequence @xmath304 with @xmath305 and @xmath255 for all @xmath263 ( and vice versa ) . the set of such sequences is exactly @xmath251 . as any eigenvalue belongs to @xmath269 , there is a canonical embedding of groups @xmath306 . in fact , as things are set up here this embedding is just inclusion of subsets of @xmath268 . by duality , this gives rise to a group homomorphism @xmath307 with dense range . this homomorphism induces then an action @xmath308 of @xmath11 on @xmath286 via @xmath309 it is not hard to see that this @xmath308 corresponds to @xmath256 if @xmath286 is identified with @xmath251 according to proposition [ prop - canonical - isom ] . disentangling definitions , we also infer that the action is given by @xmath310 ( for @xmath311 and @xmath312 ) . we denote the arising dynamical system as @xmath313 . it is isomorphic to the binary odometer . by its very construction it is what is called a _ rotation on a compact abelian group _ ( viz the action @xmath308 comes about by multiplication with @xmath314 , where @xmath315 is a group homomorphism ) . thus , by standard theory ( see e.g. @xcite ) its group of continuous eigenvalues is exactly given by the dual of @xmath286 i.e. by @xmath281 . now , obviously any eigenfunction of @xmath275 gives immediately rise to an eigenfunction of @xmath186 for the same eigenvalue ( by composing with the factor map ) . as the factor map is continuous , we obtain in this way continuous eigenfunctions to each of the elements from @xmath281 . minimality easily shows that ( up to an overall scaling ) each of these eigenfunctions is unique . thus , we obtain a family of continuous eigenfunctions . at this point it is not clear that all continuous eigenvalues of @xmath142 belongs to @xmath281 . however , this ( and more ) will be shown later . we can use the preceding considerations to introduce a closed equivalence relation @xmath316 on @xmath186 via @xmath317 then , @xmath318 is a compact topological space when equipped with the quotient topology . clearly , @xmath319 if and only if @xmath320 . thus , the relation @xmath316 is compatible with the shift operation . hence , the quotient @xmath318 becomes a dynamical system with the operation @xmath321 induced by the shift . fix now an @xmath322 . as discussed above continuous eigenfunctions do not vanish anywhere and the multiplicity of each continuous eigenvalue is one . thus , for each @xmath312 there exists a unique eigenfunction @xmath323 to @xmath75 on @xmath186 with @xmath324 . then , the arising system of eigenfunctions will have the property that @xmath325 for all @xmath326 . thus , any @xmath224 will give rise to an element of @xmath327 via @xmath328 even more is true and the following result holds . it is well - known and can be found in various places in the literature . recent discussions are given in @xcite . [ conjugate ] the dynamical systems @xmath329 and @xmath313 are conjugate via the map @xmath330 \mapsto ( k\mapsto f_k ( \omega)).\ ] ] in particular , the eigenvalues of @xmath331 are exactly given by the elements of @xmath281 . we now further investigate @xmath316 and provide a characterization of @xmath319 . here , we will again use the special words @xmath332 introduced above . [ prop - characterization - approx ] for @xmath333 the relation @xmath319 holds if and only if one of the following two properties hold : * @xmath334 . * there exist @xmath335 with @xmath336 and @xmath337 with @xmath338 and @xmath339 . let @xmath340 with @xmath341 and @xmath342 be given . by definition of @xmath316 and the above construction of the eigenfunctions of @xmath142 , we then have that @xmath343 for all @xmath212 . call this quantity @xmath259 . in the remaining part of the proof we will identify such a @xmath259 with its unique representative in @xmath344 . as @xmath341 we infer that one of the sequences @xmath345 or @xmath346 must be bounded . ( otherwise , @xmath1 and @xmath347 would agree on larger and larger pieces around the origin and then had to be equal . ) assume without loss of generality that @xmath348 is bounded . by restricting attention to a subsequence we can then assume without loss of generality that @xmath349 for all @xmath146 . after shifting the sequences by @xmath350 to the left we can then assume without loss of generality that @xmath351 for all @xmath146 . by definition of @xmath350 , there exist then letters @xmath352 with latexmath:[\[\omega = ... s| p^{(n)} ... \;\:\mbox{and}\;\ : \omega { ' } = ... s { ' } denotes the position of the origin . this gives , by definition of the @xmath146-partition that in fact @xmath354 and @xmath355 . as @xmath356 we infer that @xmath357 . this finishes the proof . the previous result shows that the factor map from @xmath186 to @xmath358 is one - to - one except on three orbits . this has strong consequences as will be discussed next . as @xmath142 is uniquely ergodic , there exists a unique @xmath44-invariant probability measure @xmath73 on @xmath186 . the operation @xmath44 then induces a unitary operator @xmath359 on the associated @xmath360-space via @xmath361 an element @xmath362 ( with @xmath363 ) is called a _ measurable eigenfunction to @xmath364 _ if @xmath365 . the subshift is said to have _ pure point spectrum _ if there exists an orthonormal basis of measurable eigenfunctions . from the two previous results we immediately infer the following . the dynamical system @xmath142 has pure point spectrum and any measurable eigenvalue is a continuous eigenvalue and belongs to @xmath281 . the dynamical system @xmath366 has pure point spectrum with all eigenvalues being continuous and belonging to @xmath281 as it is a shift on the compact abelian group @xmath286 which is the pontryagin dual of @xmath281 , @xcite . as the dynamical system @xmath318 is conjugate to @xmath313 due to lemma [ conjugate ] it has also pure point spectrum with all eigenvalues being continuous and belonging to @xmath281 . now , proposition [ prop - characterization - approx ] shows that factor map from @xmath186 to @xmath358 is one - to - one except on three countable orbits . this implies that in terms of measures the associated @xmath360-spaces are isomorphic . this easily gives the desired result . the occurrence of pure point dynamical spectrum is a key feature in the investigation of aperiodic order . in fact , while there is no axiomatic framework for aperiodic order a distinctive feature is ( pure ) point diffraction . now , pure point diffraction has been shown to be equivalent to pure point dynamical spectrum . for the case of subshifts at hand this can be inferred ( after some work ) from @xcite . a more general result ( dealing with uniquely ergodic delone systems ) was then given in @xcite . the result can even further be generalized to measure dynamical systems and even processes @xcite . the previous theorem implies that @xmath313 is exactly the _ maximal equicontinuous factor _ of @xmath142 ( see e.g. @xcite for definition ) . indeed , one of the many equivalent ways to describe this factor is as the dual group of the group of continuous eigenvalues . a recent discussion of this and various related facts can be found in @xcite . henceforth , we will denote the maximal equicontinuous factor of @xmath142 by @xmath367 and the corresponding factor map by @xmath368 . then , our findings so far provide the following theorem . [ main - max - equicontinuous - factor ] the three dynamical systems @xmath369 , @xmath370 , @xmath313 and @xmath367 are topologically conjugate . the factor map @xmath371 is one - to - one in all points except on the images of the points of the orbits of @xmath332 . in these points it is three - to - one . * minimal systems with the property that their factor map to the maximal equicontinuous factor is one - to - one in at least one point are known as _ almost automorphic systems _ ( see e.g. @xcite for further details ) . their study has attracted a lot of attention . as the previous result shows , @xmath142 is an almost automorphic system . in fact , as @xmath186 is uncountable , the factor map is one - to - one in almost every point with respect to the unique invariant probability measure @xmath73 on @xmath186 . this is sometimes expressed as _ the factor map from @xmath142 to its maximal equicontinuous factor is almost - everywhere one - to - one_. * there is an alternative description of the relation @xmath316 for almost automorphic systems . more specifically , define the _ proximality relation _ @xmath372 by @xmath373 where @xmath156 is any metric on @xmath186 inducing the topology . ( due to compactness of @xmath186 the relation is indeed independent of the chosen metric . ) note that the proximality relation can be though of as describing asymptotic agreement . then , for almost automorphic systems the proximality relation @xmath372 and the relation @xmath316 agree . this can be found in the book of auslander @xcite . a recent discussion is given in @xcite . in fact , this result is even more general in that one does not need almost automorphy but only a weaker condition called _ coincidence rank one_. we refrain from further discussion of this concept and refer the reader to e.g. @xcite for further investigation . we just note that in our situation equality of @xmath372 and @xmath316 and the characterization of @xmath316 in proposition [ prop - characterization - approx ] imply that sequences which are proximal ( i.e. asymptotically equal ) are in fact equal everywhere up to one position . * in @xcite vorobets shows that the one - dimensional subshift associated to @xmath140 has the binary odometer @xmath313 as a factor with the factor map being @xmath374 in all points except three orbits . he uses this to conclude pure point spectrum and unique ergodicity . our corresponding results above for the two - sided subshift can therefore be seen as analogues to his results . however , our approach is different : it is based on @xmath146-partition whereas his approach is based on toeplitz sequences . in this section we have a closer look at the structure of @xmath141 . the main focus will be on occurrences of three blocks and the index of words ( also known as critical exponent ) . we will use @xmath146-partitions in our study in a spirit similar to @xcite . we start by investigating occurrences of almost four blocks . an easy inspection of @xmath171 gives the following lemma . [ one - three - plus - block ] the word @xmath375 belongs to @xmath141 . the previous result deals with occurrence of a cube ( and even a bit more ) of the special word @xmath376 . as @xmath141 is invariant under @xmath140 this then yields the occurrence of many more cubes . this can be used to exclude eigenvalues for schrdinger operators via the so - called gordon argument . this is discussed in @xcite for the case at hand . such an application of the gordon arguments for subshifts coming from substitution goes back to @xcite , see @xcite for a survey as well . here , we turn next to showing that there are no fourth powers occurring in @xmath141 . let us recall from the considerations on @xmath146-partitions in section [ section - n - partition ] that there exists a sequence @xmath377 such that the fixed point @xmath171 of @xmath378 can be written as @xmath217 with @xmath379 for any @xmath380 . this way of writing @xmath171 is referred to as the @xmath146-decomposition of @xmath171 . call the sequence @xmath381 the _ @xmath146-th derived sequence of @xmath171_. note that for any natural number @xmath146 the combinatorial properties of the sequence @xmath382 are exactly the same as the combinatorial properties of the sequence @xmath383 as @xmath173 is injective on @xmath384 and @xmath385 holds . @xcite[isolation ] in the derived sequence @xmath386 the letters @xmath153 and @xmath155 always occur isolated preceded and followed by an @xmath151 . the letter @xmath151 always occurs either isolated ( i.e. preceded and followed by elements of @xmath387 ) or in the form @xmath388 . in particular , there is no occurrence of @xmath389 . the analogue statements hold for any natural number @xmath146 for the sequence @xmath382 ( with @xmath185 replaced by @xmath390 and @xmath391 ) . in terms of information the derived sequences @xmath382 are as useful as the original sequence . we will base our subsequent investigations on the relatively simple properties of the derived sequence @xmath383 given in the preceding proposition . more information should be obtainable from a more detailed study of the derived sequences . the @xmath146-decomposition of @xmath171 gives a way of writing @xmath171 as a concatenation of the words @xmath180 and elements from @xmath384 . for example @xmath171 can be written as @xmath392 where we have put brackets around the @xmath393 . still , @xmath171 can contain further occurrences of @xmath394 as indicated in the preceding formula . more generally , it is not true that a @xmath180 occurring somewhere in @xmath171 is in fact one of the words @xmath180 appearing in the @xmath146-decomposition of @xmath171 . however , it turns out that whenever @xmath206 occurs in @xmath171 then both of its @xmath180 actually stem from the @xmath146-partition . in this sense , there is some form of alignment . this is the content of the next proposition @xcite . [ prop - alignment ] consider a natural number @xmath146 and @xmath395 . if @xmath396 occurs in @xmath171 at the position @xmath397 ( i.e. @xmath398 holds ) , then @xmath397 is of the form @xmath399 for some @xmath400 . this means that if @xmath401 occurs somewhere in @xmath171 then both of its words @xmath180 actually agree with blocks @xmath180 appearing in the @xmath146-decomposition @xmath402 if @xmath403 is a finite word in @xmath141 and @xmath35 is a prefix of @xmath403 and @xmath126 is a natural number we define the _ index of the word @xmath403 in @xmath404 _ by @xmath405 and denote it by @xmath406 . we then define the _ index of the word @xmath403 _ by @xmath407 as our subshift is minimal and aperiodic the index of every word can easily be seen to be finite . \(a ) for every @xmath408 the inequality @xmath409 holds . in particular , @xmath171 does not contain a fourth power . \(b ) we have @xmath410 _ remark . _ the supremum over all the indices is sometimes known as the critical exponent . a proof can be found in @xcite . here , we only sketch the idea . by lemma [ one - three - plus - block ] the word @xmath411 ( with @xmath412 ) belongs to @xmath141 . for each @xmath263 we then have @xmath413 and we infer that the index must be at least @xmath3 . thus , it suffices to show that @xmath171 does not contain a fourth power . to do so , it suffices to consider occurrences of powers of words @xmath403 in @xmath171 . for short words the statement can easily be checked . consider now the case @xmath414 for some @xmath262 . assume that @xmath415 occurs in @xmath141 . then , the proposition on alignment gives that the length of @xmath403 is given by @xmath416 . this then easily implies the desired statement . the proof of the theorem shows that the length of any word @xmath408 whose cube @xmath415 also belongs to @xmath141 is given by @xmath291 for some @xmath263 . in this section we present a result on the word complexity of @xmath141 . a detailed proof can be found in @xcite . we define the _ word complexity _ of the subshift @xmath142 as @xmath417 recall that a word @xmath418 is called _ right special _ if the set of its extensions @xmath419 has more than one element . \(a ) for any @xmath420 and @xmath421 with @xmath422 we have @xmath423 \(b ) the complexity function @xmath424 satisfies @xmath425 and then for any @xmath420 and @xmath421 with @xmath422 @xmath426 \(c ) consider @xmath420 and @xmath421 with @xmath422 . * if @xmath427 , then there exist exactly two right special words of length @xmath428 . these are given by the suffix of @xmath180 of length @xmath428 ( which can be extended by @xmath185 ) and the suffix of @xmath429 of length @xmath428 ( which can be extended by @xmath430 and by @xmath431 ) . * if @xmath432 , then there exists exactly one right special words of length @xmath428 . this is given by the suffix of @xmath180 of length @xmath428 ( which can be extended by @xmath185 ) . the proof relies on a detailed investigation of the @xmath146-partition of @xmath171 . this allows one to directly determine all words of length @xmath433 in @xmath141 and this gives @xmath434 for all @xmath250 . at the same time the study of the @xmath146-partition allows one to obtain a lower bound on the difference @xmath435 for all @xmath436 . this in turn gives a lower bound on @xmath424 . combining the lower bound and the precise values we obtain the statements of the theorem . as @xmath141 is closed under reflections by proposition [ prop - palindrome ] the above statements about right special words easily translate on corresponding statements about left special words . ( here , a word @xmath418 is called _ left special _ if the set @xmath437 has more than one element . ) this shows in particular that the words @xmath180 , @xmath250 , are both right special and left special ( and are the only words with this property ) . in this section we present an automaton that generates the fixed point @xmath171 of the substitution @xmath140 . this is well in line with general theory on how to exhibit fixed points of substitutions by automata , see e.g. the monograph @xcite to which we also refer for background on automata . there are numerous applications of automatic sequences in group theory . for a recent example and a list of further reference we refer the reader to @xcite . ] consider the automaton @xmath5 from figure [ automaton ] . it is an automaton over the alphabet @xmath438 with four states @xmath439 , which are labeled by @xmath440 respectively . then , the infinite sequence @xmath441 generated by the automaton with initial state @xmath442 is defined as follows : write @xmath250 in its binary expansion as @xmath443 with @xmath444 and @xmath445 , @xmath446 . consider now the path @xmath447 in the automaton starting in @xmath442 and following the sequence @xmath448 . then , @xmath449 is defined to be the label of the state where this path ends . the fixed point @xmath171 of @xmath140 agrees with @xmath450 ( where the fixed point is considered as a map from @xmath451 to @xmath452 ) . this theorem is an immediate consequence of the next proposition . to state the proposition we will need some further pieces of notation . for each @xmath250 and each state @xmath453 of the automaton we define @xmath454 to be the word over @xmath452 of length @xmath455 obtained in the following way : let @xmath456 be the list of all words of length @xmath146 over @xmath438 in lexicographic order ( where @xmath457 ) . consider now for each @xmath458 the path in the automaton starting at @xmath453 and following the word @xmath459 . then , the @xmath75-th letter of @xmath460 is defined to be the label of the state where this path ends . define the letters @xmath182 and recall the recursion formula @xmath461 with @xmath462 . for each natural number @xmath146 and each @xmath463 we have @xmath464 this is proven by induction . the case @xmath465 follows by inspection . assume now that the statement is true for some @xmath466 and consider @xmath467 . then the lexicographic ordering of the words of length @xmath468 over @xmath438 is given by @xmath469 where @xmath470 is the lexicographic ordering of the words of length @xmath467 over @xmath438 . thus , from the rules of the automaton we obtain for each @xmath463 @xmath471 where we set @xmath472 . from our assumption for @xmath146 and the recursion we then find @xmath473 for each @xmath474 and this is the desired statement . the substitution @xmath140 arises naturally in the study of grigorchuk groups @xmath147 and its schreier graphs ( see below ) . from the point of view of subshifts it has the ( slight ) disadvantage of not being primitive . it turns out that it is possible to find a primitive substitution @xmath475 with the same fixed point - and hence the same subshift - as @xmath140 . this can then be used to obtain alternative proofs for the ( proven above ) linear repetitivity and pure discreteness of the spectrum . this is discussed at the end of this section . the material presented here was pointed out to us by fabien durand @xcite . consider the substitution @xmath476 on the alphabet @xmath452 with @xmath477 as any letter of the alphabet is contained in @xmath478 for any letter @xmath479 , this is a primitive substitution . to relate it to @xmath140 we use ( again ) for @xmath250 the letters @xmath480 as well as the recursion formula @xmath481 with @xmath462 . for any natural number @xmath146 the equality @xmath482 holds . in particular , the fixed point @xmath171 of @xmath140 agrees with the fixed point of @xmath476 . this is shown by induction . the cases @xmath483 are easily checked by direct inspection . assume now that the statement is true for all integers up to some @xmath484 . then , we can compute @xmath485 by @xmath486 we then find @xmath487 from our assumption on @xmath146 we then infer @xmath488 successive application of the recursion formula and the fact that @xmath489 then give @xmath490 this is the desired statement . the subshift @xmath491 generated by the primitive substitution @xmath476 agrees with the subshift @xmath142 . as it is well known , see e.g. @xcite , that subshifts associated to primitive substitutions are linearly repetitive , an immediate consequence of the previous corollary is that @xmath142 is linearly repetitive . also , as @xmath476 has constant length ( i.e. the length of @xmath492 is the same for any letter @xmath493 ) and @xmath494 starts with @xmath162 for any letter @xmath493 we can apply a result of dekking @xcite to obtain purely discrete spectrum . in this section we recall some basic notions and concepts from the theory of graphs , dynamical systems , and schreier graphs . in the next section we will meet all these abstract concepts in the context of a particular group . here we first recall some terminology from the theory of graphs and introduce the topological space of ( isomorphism classes of ) rooted labeled graphs . let @xmath495 be a finite non - empty set together with an involution @xmath496 . graph with edges labeled by @xmath495 _ is a pair @xmath497 consisting of a set @xmath498 and a set @xmath499 such that @xmath500 belongs to @xmath501 if @xmath502 belongs to @xmath501 . the elements of @xmath498 are called vertices and the elements of @xmath501 are called edges . whenever @xmath503 is an edge , then @xmath154 is called the _ label _ , @xmath504 the _ origin _ and @xmath505 the _ terminal vertex _ of the edge . we say that _ there is an edge from the vertex @xmath35 the the vertex @xmath403 with label @xmath154 _ if @xmath500 belongs to @xmath501 . an edge @xmath506 is said to _ emanate _ from the vertex @xmath35 if @xmath507 . the number of edges emanating from a vertex is called the _ degree _ of the vertex . an edge of the form @xmath508 is called a _ loop _ at @xmath35 ( with label @xmath154 ) . we will a need the _ combinatorial distance _ on a graph given as follows . each vertex has distance @xmath509 to itself . the distance between different vertices @xmath35 and @xmath403 is one if and only if there exists a label @xmath154 such that @xmath500 belongs to @xmath501 . more generally the distance between different vertices @xmath35 and @xmath403 is then defined inductively as the smallest natural number @xmath146 such that there exists a vertex @xmath510 with distance @xmath511 to @xmath35 and distance one to @xmath403 . if no such @xmath146 exists the combinatorial distance is defined to be @xmath166 . the graph is called _ connected _ if the distance between any two if its vertices is finite . likewise the _ connected component _ of a vertex is the set of all vertices with finite distance to it . a _ ray _ in an infinite graph is an infinite sequence @xmath512 of pairwise different vertices with distance one between consecutive vertices . two rays are equivalent if there exists a third ray containing infinitely many vertices of each of the rays . an equivalence class of rays is called an _ end _ of the graph . for example finite graphs have @xmath509 ends , the cayley graphs of @xmath11 , @xmath513 and @xmath514 ( the free group on two letters ) have @xmath515 and infinitely many ends , respectively . in general the cayley graph of a group may have @xmath516 or infinitely many ends . a _ rooted graph _ is a pair consisting of a graph and a vertex belonging to the vertex set of the graph . this vertex is then called the _ root_. two rooted graphs @xmath517 and @xmath518 labeled by the same set @xmath495 are called isomorphic if there exists a bijective map @xmath519 from the vertices of @xmath520 to the vertices of @xmath521 taking @xmath522 to @xmath523 such that the vertices @xmath151 and @xmath153 in @xmath520 are connected by an edge of color @xmath154 if and only if their images in @xmath524 are connected by an edge of color @xmath154 . in this case we write @xmath525 . let us now consider the set @xmath526 of isomorphism classes of connected rooted graphs labeled with elements from @xmath495 that we endow with the following natural metric . the distance between the isomorphism classes of the two rooted graphs @xmath527 and @xmath528 is then defined as @xmath529,[(y_2,v_2)]):=\inf\left\{\frac{1}{r+1 } : b_{y_1}(v_1,r ) \cong b_{y_2}(v_2,r ) \right\}\ ] ] where @xmath530 is the ( labeled ) ball of radius @xmath531 centered in @xmath35 in the combinatorial metric on @xmath266 . if we only consider graphs of uniformly bounded degree ( as we will in this paper ) , the space @xmath532 is compact . we now turn to dynamical systems . whenever the group @xmath533 acts on the compact space @xmath266 via the continuous map @xmath534 we call @xmath535 a _ dynamical system_. we will mostly suppress the @xmath536 in the notation . in particular , we will write @xmath537 instead of @xmath538 and we will write @xmath539 for @xmath540 ( with @xmath272 and @xmath541 ) . if @xmath533 is the infinite cyclic group @xmath11 , then the action of @xmath533 on @xmath266 is determined by @xmath542 and we then just write @xmath543 instead of @xmath544 ( and this is well in line with the notation used in the previous sections ) . whenever a dynamical system @xmath537 and @xmath272 is given we call @xmath545 the _ orbit of @xmath153 ( under h)_. the dynamical system @xmath537 is _ minimal _ if every orbit is dense in @xmath266 . the dynamical system @xmath537 is called _ uniquely ergodic _ if there exists exactly one @xmath533-invariant probability measure on @xmath266 . the dynamical system @xmath537 is called a _ factor _ of the dynamical system @xmath546 if there exist a continuous surjective map @xmath547 with @xmath548 for all @xmath541 and @xmath549 . this map @xmath550 is then called _ factor map_. the dynamical system @xmath537 is then also referred to as _ extension _ of the dynamical system @xmath546 . we will deal with graphs arising from dynamical systems . more specifically , consider a group @xmath533 generated by a symmetric finite set @xmath43 and assume that @xmath533 acts on the compact space @xmath266 . then any point @xmath272 gives rise to the _ orbital schreier graph of @xmath153 _ denoted by @xmath551 . this is a rooted graph labeled by @xmath43 , which is equipped with the involution @xmath552 . the set of vertices of @xmath551 is given by the points in the orbit of @xmath153 . the root is given by @xmath153 and rhere is an edge from @xmath35 to @xmath403 with label @xmath553 if @xmath554 . note that by the required symmetry of @xmath43 we then have also an edge from @xmath403 to @xmath35 with label @xmath555 ( as is needed according to our definition of a labeled graph ) . as an example we note the cayley graph of a group @xmath147 with generating set @xmath43 . this cayley graph ( with the neutral element of @xmath147 as the root ) is the orbital schreier graph of @xmath147 corresponding to the action of @xmath147 on itself via left multiplication . if the elements of @xmath43 happen to all be involutions then there will be an edge of label @xmath479 from @xmath35 to @xmath403 if and only if there is an edge of label @xmath479 from @xmath403 to @xmath35 . this is the situation we will encounter in the next section . in this section we introduce the main object of our interest : the first group of intermediate growth @xmath147 and the laplacians on the associated schreier graphs . the group @xmath147 is the first group with intermediate word growth and was introduced by the first author in @xcite . by now it is generally known as grigorchuk s group @xmath147 and this is how we will refer to it . it is generated by four involutions @xmath556 . with notation to be introduced presently , the group @xmath147 can be viewed as a group acting by automorphisms on the full infinite binary tree @xmath557 . the action extends by continuity to an action by homeomorphisms on the boundary @xmath558 . the action of @xmath147 gives rise to schreier graphs the schreier graphs arising from actions of automorphism groups of infinite regular rooted trees have attracted substantial attention in recent years @xcite . of particular interest are so - called self - similar groups ( as @xmath147 ) whose action reflect the self - similar structure of the tree . their schreier graphs also have self - similarity features . some are closely related to julia sets @xcite , others are fractal sets close to e.g. the sierpinski gasket or the apollonian gasket @xcite . the spectra of the laplacians on such graphs have been described in some cases @xcite . the spectrum can be a union of intervals @xcite , a cantor set @xcite , or a union of a cantor set together with an infinite set of isolated points that accumulate to it , as in the case of the so - called hanoi tower group @xcite . these investigations all use the method introduced in @xcite . here we study the spectra of the laplacians on the schreier graphs by a different method via the connection to aperiodic order . this allows us to determine the spectral type of the laplacians for arbitrary choice of weights on the generators of the group . we thus obtain one of the rare examples where we understand how the spectrum of the laplacian depends on the weights . in general this dependence is very poorly understood , as well as the dependence of the spectrum on the generating set in the group . let us mention here a recent result of grabowski and virag who show in @xcite that there is a weighted laplacian on the lamplighter group that has singular continous spectrum , whereas the unweighted laplacian on the same generators is known to have pure point spectrum @xcite . let us denote by @xmath559 , @xmath560 with @xmath561 , the _ rooted regular tree of degree _ @xmath453 . the vertex set of @xmath559 is given by @xmath562 , i.e. the set of all words over the alphabet @xmath563 . the root of @xmath559 is the empty word . there is an edge between @xmath35 and @xmath403 whenever @xmath564 or @xmath565 holds for some @xmath566 . the words @xmath567 constitute the _ @xmath146-the level _ of the tree . ( in the tree , they are at combinatorial distance exactly @xmath146 from the root . ) the boundary @xmath568 of @xmath559 consisting of infinite geodesic rays in @xmath559 emanating from the root ( i.e. infinite paths starting in the root all of whose edges are pairwise different ) can then be identified with the set @xmath569 of one - sided infinite words over @xmath570 . as mentioned above , the set @xmath571 is equipped with the product topology and is thus a compact space homeomorphic to the cantor set . any automorphism of @xmath559 necessarily preserves the root ( which is the only vertex with degree @xmath453 ) and maps paths starting in the root to paths starting in the root . this readily implies that any automorphisms group action on @xmath559 is level preserving , i.e. maps words of length @xmath146 to words of length @xmath146 . any such action then extends to an action of the same group by homeomorphisms on the boundary @xmath568 . a regular rooted tree is a self - similar object . indeed , the subtree rooted at an arbitrary vertex of the tree is isomorphic to the whole tree @xmath559 . the full group of automorphisms inherits this self - similarity property in the following sense : any automorphism of @xmath559 is completely determined by the permutation it induces on the @xmath453 branches growing from the root ( an element of @xmath572 ) and the collection of @xmath453 automorphisms @xmath573 which coincide with the restrictions of @xmath574 on the corresponding branches . however , if one is interested in a subgroup @xmath575 and wants it to be self - similar , one has to impose the condition that all the restrictions @xmath573 are again elements of the same group @xmath533 , so that every @xmath576 can be represented as @xmath577 where @xmath536 belongs to @xmath578 and describes the action of @xmath574 on the first level of @xmath559 and @xmath579 is the restriction of @xmath574 on the full subtree of @xmath559 rooted at the vertex @xmath580 of the first level of @xmath559 . this leads to the following definition . [ defiselfsimilar ] a group @xmath533 of automorphisms of @xmath559 is _ self - similar _ if , for all @xmath581 , there exist @xmath582 such that @xmath583 for all finite words @xmath403 over the alphabet @xmath563 . we refer the interested reader to @xcite for more information about self - similar groups . we now turn our attention to one particular example of a self - similar group that will be the central object of our study , the grigorchuk group @xmath147 . it is generated by four automorphisms @xmath556 of the rooted binary tree @xmath584 as follows : * @xmath585 , @xmath586 * @xmath587 , @xmath588 * @xmath589 , @xmath590 * @xmath591 , @xmath592 for an arbitrary word @xmath403 over @xmath438 . these automorphisms can also be expressed in the self - similar form , as above : @xmath593 where @xmath506 and @xmath594 are , respectively , the trivial and the non - trivial permutations in the group @xmath595 . observe that all the generators are involutions and that @xmath596 commute and constitute a group isomorphic to the klein group @xmath597 . let as also mention that there are many more relations and the group is not finitely presented . for our subsequent discussion it will be important that @xmath147 acts _ transitively _ on each level , i.e. for arbitrary words @xmath598 over @xmath438 with the same length there exists a @xmath599 with @xmath600 . the action of @xmath147 on the set @xmath602 of vertices of the rooted binary tree and on its boundary @xmath603 induces on this set the structure of a graph labeled with @xmath604 . specifically , the vertex set of this graph is given by @xmath605 and there is an edge with label @xmath606 and origin @xmath35 and terminal vertex @xmath403 if and only if @xmath607 holds . note that the set of arising edges has indeed the symmetry property required in our definition of a labeled graph as any @xmath608 is an involution . for the first three levels of the tree the resulting graphs are shown in figure [ schreier - finite ] . the connected components of this graph correspond to the orbits of the group action . thus , the rooted graphs consisting of such a connected component together with a root are orbital schreier graphs ( in the sense defined above ) . there are two kind of such connected components viz finite and infinite components . the finite ones correspond to the levels of the tree ( recall that the action of @xmath147 on the levels of the tree is transitive ) . we will refer to them simply as _ schreier graphs_. the infinite ones correspond to the orbits of the action on the boundary . the corresponding rooted graphs will be referred to as _ orbital schreier graphs_. we will need the isomorphism classes of schreier graphs and introduce therefore the map @xmath609,\ ] ] where @xmath610 is the connected component of @xmath35 . the graphs @xmath611 and @xmath610 coincide ( as non - rooted graphs ) whenever @xmath35 and @xmath403 are in the same orbit of the action of @xmath147 . in particular , as @xmath147 acts transitively on each level of the tree , for @xmath263 we can therefore define @xmath612 which coincides with @xmath611 for all @xmath613 with @xmath614 . in general , the graph @xmath615 has a linear shape ; it has @xmath616 simple edges , all labeled by @xmath162 , and @xmath617 cycles of length 2 whose edges are labeled by @xmath618 . it is regular of degree 4 , with one loop at each edge . the loop contributes 1 to the degree of the vertex because all generators are elements of order 2 , and the labeling of the loop is uniquely determined by the labeling of the other edges around the vertex , as edges around one vertex are labeled by @xmath150 . the graphs @xmath619 , @xmath620 corresponding to the action of @xmath147 on the boundary are infinite and have either two ends or one end . the graph @xmath621 corresponding to the orbit of the rightmost infinite ray , is one - ended ( see figure [ one - ended ] ) , and so are then all graphs in the same orbit . . ] all the other graphs @xmath622 , are two - ended . they are all isomorphic as unlabeled graphs . in @xcite , vorobets studied the closure @xmath623 of the space of schreier graphs in the space of isomorphism classes of rooted labeled graphs . we recall some of his results next . he showed that the one - ended graphs are exactly the isolated points of this closure @xmath623 , and that the other points in @xmath624 are two ended graphs . this suggests to consider the compact set @xmath625 the group @xmath147 acts on @xmath626 by changing the root of the graph . the arising dynamical system is denoted as @xmath601 . it is minimal and uniquely ergodic and its invariant probability measure will be denoted as @xmath627 . a precise description of @xmath626 can be given as follows . the space @xmath626 consists of all isomorphism classes of two - ended rooted schreier graphs @xmath628 and of three additional countable families of isomorphism classes of two - ended graphs . these families are obtained by gluing two copies of the one - ended graph @xmath629 , at the root in three possible ways corresponding to choosing a pair @xmath630 , @xmath631 or @xmath632 and then choosing an arbitrary vertex of the arising graph as the root . one of these three possibilities is shown in figure [ connecting - two - copies ] . there , the chosen pair is @xmath632 and to avoid confusion with other edges with the same labels , labels at the gluing point are denoted with a prime . ] the decomposition of @xmath626 into isomorphism classes of the @xmath633 and the three families mentioned above gives immediately rise to a factor map @xmath634 which is one - to - one except in a countable set of points , where it is three - to - one . in fact , the inverse map @xmath635 exists on the complement @xmath636 of the orbit of the point @xmath637 and agrees there with @xmath638 . under this factor map @xmath639 the unique @xmath147-invariant probability measure @xmath627 on @xmath626 is mapped to the uniform bernoulli measure @xmath133 on @xmath640 . whenever a group @xmath533 acts on a measure space @xmath641 by measure preserving transformations , one obtains the _ koopman representation _ @xmath642 of @xmath533 on @xmath643 via @xmath644 ( for @xmath645 ) . any @xmath646 is then a unitary operator ( as the action is measure preserving ) . in our situation when @xmath647 , we have moreover that for @xmath608 the unitary operator @xmath648 is its own inverse ( as @xmath479 is an involution ) and hence must be selfadjoint . in particular , for any set of parameters @xmath649 we obtain a selfadjoint operator @xmath650 consider first an arbitrary @xmath620 . then , there is an action of @xmath147 on the ( countable ) vertex set of @xmath651 of @xmath619 . specifically , @xmath652 maps the vertex @xmath653 to the vertex @xmath654 , which is the unique vertex of @xmath655 connected to @xmath35 by an edge of label @xmath479 . clearly , this action preserves the counting measure on @xmath651 . thus , we obtain a representation @xmath656 of @xmath147 on @xmath657 . an operator @xmath658 defined by @xmath659 with @xmath620 and @xmath649 will be called _ ( weighted ) laplacian of the schreier graph _ @xmath619 . * it is possible to understand @xmath651 as @xmath660 , where @xmath661 is the stabilizer of @xmath475 in the action of @xmath147 on @xmath558 , and then @xmath656 is the quasi - regular representation @xmath662 associated to @xmath660 . * if @xmath663 are positive with @xmath664 then it is possible to interpret the operators @xmath665 as the markov operators of a random walk on the graph @xmath619 . in the general case , the operator @xmath666 can still be seen as the natural weighted adjacency matrix or laplacian associated to the the graph @xmath619 . we can also equip @xmath667 with the uniform bernoulli measure @xmath133 and consider the koopman representation @xmath668 of @xmath147 on @xmath669 given via @xmath670 this is a unitary representation of @xmath147 and any @xmath671 , @xmath672 , is a unitary selfadjoint involution . for @xmath673 we then obtain the operator @xmath674 via @xmath675 the following is a crucial result on the spectral theory of the above operators . [ constancy - bg ] for any given set of parameters @xmath649 the spectrum of @xmath666 does not depend on @xmath676 and coincides with the spectrum of @xmath677 . of course , there is the question what the spectrum is in terms of the parameters @xmath663 . a complete answer was given in @xcite in the case @xmath678 . the spectrum then consists of two points or one or two intervals , and an explicit description of the spectrum can be given in terms of the parameters@xmath679 and @xmath680 . in fact , the case @xmath680 is the case of periodic schrdinger type operators and can easily be treated by classical means ( floquet decomposition ) . it can also be treated by the method suggested in @xcite . for related results on the kesten - von - neummann - serre trace we refer to @xcite . below we will come to a main result of @xcite which treats the case , where @xmath680 does not hold . we will see that in this case , the spectrum is a cantor set of lebesgue measure zero . we will now provide a map @xmath681 from @xmath186 to ( isomorphism classes of ) labeled rooted graphs with labels belonging to the alphabet @xmath150 . in order to get a better understanding of this map it will be useful to think of the letters @xmath185 as encoding the pairs @xmath682 respectively . roughly speaking the map will convert @xmath224 into a graph with vertex set @xmath11 and root @xmath4 and edges between @xmath146 and @xmath467 with labels from @xmath150 according to the value of @xmath683 . we now provide the precise * definition of the labeled rooted graph @xmath684 * associated to @xmath239 as follows : _ vertices : _ the set of vertices is @xmath11 . _ root : _ the number @xmath4 is chosen as the root . _ edges : _ there are edges between vertices @xmath685 if an only if @xmath686 . specifically , edges are assigned between @xmath146 and @xmath467 and from @xmath146 to itself and from @xmath467 to itself in the following way : * if @xmath687 , then there is an edge between @xmath146 and @xmath467 and this edge carries the label @xmath162 . * if @xmath688 , then there are two edges between @xmath146 and @xmath467 ; one carries the label @xmath154 and the other carries the label @xmath152 . moreover , there is an additional edge from @xmath146 to itself labeled with @xmath156 and an additional edge from @xmath467 to itself labeled with @xmath156 . * if @xmath689 , then there are two edges between @xmath146 and @xmath467 ; one carries the label @xmath154 and the other carries the label @xmath156 . moreover , there is an additional edge from @xmath146 to itself labeled with @xmath152 and an additional edge from @xmath467 to itself labeled with @xmath152 . * if @xmath690 , then there are two edges between @xmath146 and @xmath467 ; one carries the label @xmath152 and the other carries the label @xmath156 . moreover , there is an additional edge from @xmath146 to itself labeled with @xmath154 and an additional edge from @xmath467 to itself labeled with @xmath154 . we note that in this way any vertex has for each label @xmath150 exactly one edge of this color emanating from it . we also note that the arising graphs have a linear structure in a natural sense . let @xmath691 be the metric space of isomorphism classes of connected rooted graphs labeled with elements from @xmath150 . then , @xmath681 gives rise to a map @xmath692 via @xmath693,\ ] ] where @xmath694 $ ] is the equivalence class of @xmath695 in the space of isomorphism classes of the rooted connected labeled graphs . recall that @xmath626 denotes the closure of @xmath696 in @xmath697 without its isolated points ( see section [ section - schreier ] ) . then , it turns out that the image of @xmath186 under @xmath692 is exactly @xmath626 . in fact , much more is true and this is our main result on the connection of the subshift @xmath142 and the dynamical system @xmath601 . define the maps @xmath698 from @xmath186 into itself by * @xmath699 if @xmath700 and @xmath701 if @xmath702 . * @xmath703 if @xmath704 , @xmath705 if @xmath706 and @xmath707 in all other cases . * @xmath708 if @xmath709 , @xmath710 if @xmath711 and @xmath712 in all other cases . * @xmath713 if @xmath714 , @xmath715 if @xmath716 and @xmath717 in all other cases . then , clearly , @xmath698 are homeomorphisms and involutions . let @xmath533 be the group generated by @xmath698 ( within the group of homeomorphisms of @xmath186 ) . [ main - connection ] the following statements hold : \(a ) the group @xmath147 is isomorphic to the group @xmath533 via @xmath718 with @xmath719 , @xmath720 , @xmath721 and @xmath722 . in particular , there is a well defined action @xmath536 of @xmath147 on @xmath186 given by @xmath723 for @xmath599 and @xmath724 and via this action we obtain a dynamical system @xmath725 . \(b ) the dynamical system @xmath601 is a factor of the dynamical system @xmath725 with factor map @xmath726 which is two - to - one . \(c ) for every @xmath177 the orbits @xmath727 and @xmath728 coincide . \(d ) the dynamical system @xmath725 is uniquely ergodic and the unique @xmath44-invariant probability measure on @xmath186 coincides with the unique @xmath147-invariant probability measure on @xmath186 . the theorem provides a factor map @xmath729 . in section [ section - schreier ] we have already encountered the factor map @xmath730 . putting together these factor maps provide a tower of extensions of the dynamical system @xmath731 via @xmath732 the remainder of this section is devoted to providing additional perspective on these two factor maps by discussing their respective merits . we will see that @xmath639 resolves the non - typical points and that @xmath733 allows one to embed the group @xmath147 into a topological full group . we will need a bit of notation first . let @xmath537 be a dynamical system . let @xmath576 be given . then , an @xmath272 is called _ @xmath574-typical _ if either @xmath734 or @xmath574 acts trivially in some neighborhood of @xmath153 . if @xmath272 is @xmath574-typical for any @xmath735 it is called _ typical_. typical points have many claims to be indeed typical . for instance , if @xmath533 is countable the set of typical points has a meager complement @xcite . moreover , the following is shown in @xcite . let @xmath537 be a minimal dynamical system and @xmath533 finitely generated . then , the schreier graphs of typical points are locally isomorphic ( as labeled graphs ) . moreover , if @xmath736 is typical and @xmath272 is not typical , then any ball around a vertex of @xmath737 is isomorphic to a ball around some vertex in @xmath551 . in order to get a further understanding of the typical points we will next discuss another characterization of typical points . define the _ stabilizer _ of @xmath153 as @xmath738 and the _ neighborhood stabilizer _ of @xmath153 as @xmath739 then , @xmath740 is a normal subgroup of @xmath741 and the quotient @xmath742 is called the _ group of germs _ ( at @xmath153 ) . let @xmath537 be a dynamical system . then , the following assertions are equivalent for @xmath272 . * the point @xmath153 is typical . * the group of germs @xmath743 is trivial . ( i)@xmath744 ( ii ) : if @xmath745 is not trivial , there exits a @xmath746 . hence , @xmath153 is not typical . ( ii)@xmath744 ( i ) : if @xmath153 is not typical then there exists a @xmath599 with @xmath747 but @xmath574 is not the identity on a neighborhood of @xmath153 . thus , @xmath743 is not trivial ( as it contains the class of @xmath574 ) . the points @xmath153 with non - trivial @xmath745 are sometimes called _ singular_. we will also need the concept , going back to @xcite , of the ( topological ) _ full group _ @xmath748 $ ] of a homeomorphism @xmath749 of the cantor set @xmath266 . this is the group of those homeomorphisms of @xmath266 that at any point coincide locally with powers of t. it is a countable group with remarkable properties . for example it is amenable if @xmath44 is minimal @xcite , its commutator subgroup is simple @xcite and it is finitely generated if and only if @xmath44 is a minimal subshift over a finite alphabet @xcite . after these preparations we can now came back to the situation at hand . the dynamical system @xmath731 is minimal and uniquely ergodic . however , it does have non - typical points . in fact , a point in @xmath750 is non - typical if and only if it belongs to @xmath751 ( see @xcite ) . the dynamical system @xmath601 is minimal and uniquely ergodic ( as discussed in @xcite ) . moreover , all its points are typical ( as can easily be seen ) . thus , from this point of view a key merit of @xmath601 is to provide an extension of of @xmath731 which resolves the non - typical points . the dynamical system @xmath725 is minimal and uniquely ergodic and all its points are typical ( as can easily be seen ) . moreover , as shown in the previous theorem , the dynamical system @xmath725 has the additional feature that there exists a homeomorphism @xmath44 on @xmath186 such that the orbits of @xmath44 agree with the orbits of @xmath147 . this in turn can be seen to imply that @xmath147 is a subgroup of the topological full group @xmath752 $ ] of @xmath44 . in fact , @xmath147 embeds into the topological full group of @xmath753 , as the action of generators @xmath556 on @xmath754 can be represented locally as the action by @xmath755 and @xmath756 , so @xmath147 embeds into @xmath748 $ ] . [ connection - bon ] in this context we also mention a recent article of matte bon @xcite showing that the group @xmath147 ( and other groups of intermediate growth introduced by the first author in @xcite ) embed into the topological full group @xmath757 $ ] of a minimal subshift @xmath639 over a finite alphabet . while his approach is different from ours it leads to the the same subshift for the group @xmath147 . we finish this section with the question whether there exists a minimal homeomorphism @xmath43 on @xmath626 such that @xmath147 is a subgroup of @xmath758 $ ] . in this section we discuss spectral theory of the operators @xmath666 ( defined in section [ operators ] ) for arbitrary values of the parameters @xmath663 . we do so by using the results of the previous section to transfer the problem of spectral theory of the operators @xmath666 , @xmath760 , to the field of the spectral theory of discrete schrdinger operators with aperiodic order , @xmath761 . we consider the subshift @xmath142 . in order to define the schrdinger operators we will define specific functions @xmath128 on @xmath186 depending on four real parameters @xmath663 . given these parameters we set @xmath762 and define @xmath763 and @xmath764 for a given @xmath765 and these @xmath128 we let @xmath48 , @xmath239 , be the associated operators . @xcite[unitary - equivalence ] let @xmath766 be given . let @xmath767 be arbitrary . then , there exists an @xmath1 in @xmath186 such that @xmath48 is unitarily equivalent to @xmath666 . as a consequence of the previous proposition we can translate results on the spectral theory of schrdinger operators associated to @xmath142 into results on the @xmath665 . recall that the spectrum of the @xmath666 does not depend on @xmath768 ( due to theorem [ constancy - bg ] ) . define @xmath769 [ main - laplacian - cantor ] let @xmath770 be given and let @xmath771 be the spectrum of the associated family of laplacians @xmath666 , @xmath772 . then , the following holds : \(a ) if @xmath773 holds then @xmath72 consists of one or two closed non - trivial intervals and all spectral measures are absolutely continuous . \(b ) if @xmath680 does not hold then @xmath72 is a cantor set of lebesgue measure zero and no spectral measure is absolutely continuous . note that @xmath142 is linearly repetitive due to theorem [ theorem - tau - linear - repetitive ] . now , the theorem is a direct consequence of the preceding proposition and theorem [ theorem - periodic - abstract ] and theorem [ theorem - aperiodic - abstract ] . the case @xmath680 has already be treated in @xcite and an explicit description of the spectrum ( in terms of the value of @xmath774 ) has been given there . we can also use the above considerations to translate results on absence of eigenvalues from the @xmath74 to the @xmath665 . recall that @xmath133 denotes the uniform bernoulli measure on @xmath775 . [ main - laplacian - absence - eigenvalues ] let @xmath770 be given and assume that @xmath680 does not hold . \(a ) for @xmath133-almost every @xmath620 the operator @xmath665 does not have eigenvalues . \(b ) for any @xmath776 the operator @xmath777 does not have eigenvalues . the considerations of this section are concerned with the case @xmath778 . for @xmath779 the operators in question can be decomposed as a sum of finitely many different finite dimensional operators each appearing with infinite multiplicity . thus , the spectrum is pure point with finitely many eigenvalues each with infinite multiplicity . in this section we show that the kesten - von - neumann - serre spectral measure actually agrees with the integrated density of states . this result is folklore and certainly known to experts . also , a recent discussion of a somewhat more general setting can also be found in @xcite . here , we give a direct reasoning for the case at hand based on our approach . there is one more representation studied in the context of spectral approximation . this representation comes from the action of @xmath147 on the @xmath146-th level of the tree . this action clearly preserves the counting measure on the finite set of vertices of the @xmath146-th level . it hence gives rise to a representation @xmath780 of @xmath147 on the finite dimensional @xmath781 . for @xmath673 we then set @xmath782 to each such @xmath783 we associate the _ spectral distribution _ which is the measure @xmath784 on @xmath61 given by @xmath785 where the sum runs over eigenvalues @xmath501 of @xmath783 counted with multiplicities . in the case @xmath678 it is shown in @xcite that the measures @xmath786 , @xmath263 , converge weakly and the limiting measure @xmath787 is called the _ kesten - von - neumann - serre spectral measure _ there . next we will show that the limiting measure exists for any values of the parameters @xmath663 and coincides with the so - called _ integrated density of states _ of the associated schrdinger operators . [ ids - equal - kvns - trace ] let @xmath788 be given . for @xmath263 , let @xmath783 be the corresponding operator on @xmath789 and @xmath786 its spectral distribution . then , the sequence of measures @xmath790 converges weakly towards the integrated density of states @xmath75 of @xmath74 . in particular , the integrated density of states of the @xmath74 agrees with the kesten - von - neumann - serre spectral measure . the graph arising from restricting @xmath791 to the vertex set @xmath792 $ ] and the graph @xmath789 differ at most in @xmath793 loops at the ends ( as is clear from the definitions ) . thus , a simple variant of the argument in proposition [ unitary - equivalence ] shows that the restriction of the operator @xmath794 to @xmath792 $ ] is a perturbation of @xmath783 of rank at most @xmath793 . now , corollary [ perturbation - ids ] gives the convergence of the @xmath795 towards the integrated density of states of @xmath74 . * denote the @xmath475-independent spectrum of the operators @xmath796 by @xmath797 and the spectrum of @xmath798 by @xmath799 . clearly , the support of @xmath786 is given by @xmath799 . by theorem [ theorem - support - and - atomfree ] support of the integrated density of states @xmath75 is given by @xmath797 . thus , the previous theorem gives in a certain and very weak sense the convergence of the @xmath799 towards @xmath797 . in particular , there is an inclusion of spectra as shown in corollary [ cor - inclusion ] . + in the case at hand , however , convergence of the @xmath800 towards @xmath797 holds in a much stronger sense . more precisely , the results of @xcite give the following : * * @xmath801 for all @xmath263 . * * @xmath802 . + these are rather remarkable features and not at all true for approximation of the integrated density of states of schrdinger operators in other cases . + let us note , however , that there are recent results on approximation of spectra of minimal subshifts with respect to the hausdorff distance by suitable periodic approximations @xcite . * it is also worth pointing out that the approximation of the spectra is done from below i.e. via unions . this is in contrast to other approximation schemes used in the investigations of schrdinger operators , where the approximation is done from above i.e. via intersections . * the feature presented in the preceding two points also explain that the spectrum of @xmath677 agrees with @xmath803 . the reason is simply that the representation @xmath668 decomposes as a sum of the representations @xmath260 ( as shown in @xcite ) . accordingly , @xmath677 is a sum of the finite dimensional operators @xmath783 , @xmath243 , and its spectrum is then given as the closure of the union of the spectra of the @xmath798 . l. bartholdi and r. i. grigorchuk : _ on the spectrum of hecke type operators related to some fractal groups _ , steklova * 231 * ( 2000 ) , din . gruppy , 545 ; translation in _ proc . steklov inst . _ ( 2000 ) , no . 4 ( * 231 * ) , 141 . l. bartholdi , r. i. grigorchuk and v. nekrashevych : _ from fractal groups to fractal sets _ in : fractals in graz ( p. grabner and w. woess editors ) , trends in mathematics , birkuser verlag , basel , 2003 , 25118 . r. i. grigorchuk : _ some problems of the dynamics of group actions on rooted trees ( russian ) _ , tr . mat . steklova * 273 * ( 2011 ) , sovremennye problemy matematiki , 72191 ; translation in proc . * 273 * ( 2011 ) , 64175 . r. i. grigorchuk , ya . s. krylyuk : _ the spectral measure of the markov operator related to 3-generated 2-group of intermediate growth and its jacobi parameters _ , algebra discrete math . * 13 * ( 2012 ) , 237272 . Abstract:

Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.

Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered . Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video . Paper: variational principles have a long and distinguished history in physics . apart from global formulations of physical principles , equivalent to local differential equations , they also are useful to approximate problems too difficult for analytic solutions . in the past century quantum variational calculations have been ubiquitous as an approximate method for the ground state of many difficult systems @xcite . in recent years there has been some progress in using classical variational principles ( action principles ) to approximate the motion of classical systems such as classical molecules . we review recent developments in this area of classical mechanics , although we also overlap with quantum mechanics . in particular we shall also discuss the use of the quantum variational principle for excited states , and the connection to classical action principles . in classical mechanics , variational principles are often called least action principles , because the quantity subject to variations is traditionally the action . to confuse matters there are two classical actions , corresponding to two main action principles , which are called respectively , hamilton s action @xmath0 and maupertuis action @xmath1 ; these differ from each other ( they are related by a legendre transformation ) , and the notation @xmath2 is not universal ( we follow current usage but in fact some authors use the same symbols reversed @xcite ) . both actions , @xmath3 and @xmath4 , have the same dimensions ( i.e. energy@xmath5time , or angular momentum ) . maupertuis least action principle is the older of the two ( 1744 ) by about a century , and as we shall discuss , it is inconveniently formulated in all textbooks @xcite . for clear statements of these old action principles , see the textbooks by arnold @xcite , goldstein et al @xcite , and sommerfeld @xcite . we shall review these action principles in the next section . some mathematics and notation required to deal with variational problems are summarized in appendix i. the distinguishing feature of variational problems is their character @xcite . one is searching for the which gives a minimum ( or stationary value ) to an integral , as opposed to extrema , where one is searching for the value of the variable which minimizes ( or makes stationary ) a function . of course this dichotomy is not so sharp in practice , as the global problem is equivalent to a differential equation ( the euler - lagrange equation ) which is of course local . the relation has even found its way into modern parlance @xcite : `` think globally , act locally ! '' . in quantum mechanics , where ( usually ) the aim is for approximations to the energy by choosing a wave - function , one speaks of wave - functions , which are optimized according to a variational principle . in classical action principles , the equivalent notion is that of a or trajectory , which should be optimized in accordance with the action principle . for uniformity we shall talk of in the classical domain , to emphasize the similarity of these ideas . as noted above , maupertuis action principle was formulated in precise form first by euler and lagrange some two and a half centuries ago ; for the history , see the books by yourgrau and mandelstam and by terral @xcite . however , even the formulation of these eminent mathematicians remained problematic , as emphasized by jacobi , who stated in his lectures on dynamics : `` in almost all text - books , even the best , this principle is presented so that it is impossible to understand '' @xcite . to understand at least in part the problem ( see @xcite for a detailed discussion ) , it is sufficient to note that maupertuis principle assumes conservation of energy , whereas a well formulated principle , like hamilton s principle , implies energy conservation . as we shall see , it is possible to reformulate maupertuis principle in a more general form to remedy this problem and also make it more useful in applications @xcite . it should be noted that hamilton s principle does not suffer from any such drawbacks and is useful both conceptually ( to derive equations of motion ) and as a tool for approximations . the reformulated maupertuis principle has the advantage of being closely related to the classical limit of schrdinger s variational principle of wave mechanics , and thereby lends itself easily to semiclassical applications . even though we emphasize two action principles for classical mechanics , it is worth noting that there are many other formulations and reformulations of these principles . for a list of references on this point see ref.@xcite . we note in particular the elegant work of percival in the 1970 s on variational principles for invariant tori ( see ref.@xcite for a review ) . the emphasis on maupertuis and hamilton reflects the two main approaches of mechanics , one based on the lagrangian @xmath6 and the other based on the hamiltonian @xmath7 . in the above and in section 2 we use the traditional terminology for the variational principles , i.e. `` least '' action principles , but , since jacobi s work it has been recognized @xcite that the action is in fact in general for the true trajectories . this means the first - order variation vanishes , and the action may be a minimum , a maximum or a saddle , depending on the second - order variation @xcite . hence `` stationary '' action principles would be more accurate terminology . similar remarks apply to the general maupertuis and reciprocal variational principles discussed in section 2 . in sections 2 - 4 we restrict ourselves to conservative holonomic systems . various problems are solved using classical and semiclassical variational methods and some comparisons are made with the results from the quantum variational method for excited states @xcite . in section 5 we discuss nonconservative ( but nondissipative ) systems , and in section 6 we mention briefly particular nonholonomic systems ( which have velocity constraints ) , in connection with relativistic systems . the relations between classical and quantum variational principles ( vp s ) are discussed in section 7 . hamilton s least action principle ( hp ) states that , for a true trajectory of a system , hamilton s action @xmath3 is stationary for trajectories which run from the fixed initial space - time point @xmath8 to the fixed final space - time point @xmath9 , @xmath10 where @xmath11 is the duration . here the ( hamilton ) action @xmath3 is the time integral of the lagrangian @xmath12 from the initial point to the final point on the trial trajectory @xmath13 , @xmath14 where @xmath13 is the generalized coordinate , @xmath15 the generalized velocity and @xmath16 the time . in practice we choose @xmath17 and @xmath18 for convenience . in general @xmath19 stands for the complete set of independent generalized coordinates @xmath20 , where @xmath21 is the number of degrees of freedom @xcite . @xmath22 the latter convention for the end - positions is also followed below in ( 2.2 ) , ( 2.3 ) , etc . from the action principle ( 2.1 ) one can derive lagrange s equation(s ) for the trajectory , which we shall not do in this review ; see for example @xcite . the reformulated ( or general ) maupertuis least action principle ( gmp ) states that , for a true trajectory maupertuis action @xmath4 is stationary on trajectories with fixed end - positions @xmath23 and @xmath24 and fixed mean energy @xmath25 : @xmath26 here maupertuis action @xmath4 is given by @xmath27 where @xmath28 is the canonical momentum , and in general @xmath29 stands for @xmath30 . the second form for @xmath4 is valid for normal systems , for which @xmath31 and @xmath32 is quadratic in the @xmath33 s , where @xmath32 is the kinetic energy and @xmath34 the potential energy . the mean energy @xmath25 is the time average of the hamiltonian @xmath35 over the trial trajectory of duration @xmath36 , @xmath37 from the initial position @xmath23 to the final position @xmath24 which are common to all trial trajectories . @xmath38 we use the notation @xmath25 rather than @xmath39 because in the early sections we restrict @xcite ourselves to dynamical variables where the hamiltonian is equal to the energy @xmath40 ; the general case is discussed in note @xcite and later sections . the reciprocal maupertuis principle ( rmp ) , or principle of least ( stationary ) mean energy , is @xmath41 for stationary ( i.e. steady - state or bound ) motions ( periodic , quasiperiodic , chaotic ) ( 2.3 ) is the classical limit @xcite of the schrdinger variational principle of quantum mechanics : @xmath42 , ( see also sec.7 ) . the connection is clear intuitively : for bound motions , in the large quantum number limit the expectation value of the hamiltonian becomes the classical mean energy and the quantum number @xmath43 becomes proportional to the classical action @xmath4 over the motion . this connection enables the rmp to lend itself naturally to semiclassical applications ( sec . 2.3 ) . for periodic and quasiperiodic motions the reciprocal maupertuis principle ( 2.3 ) is equivalent @xcite to percival s principle for invariant tori @xcite . the rmp is , however , more general and is valid for chaotic motions , scattering orbits , arbitrary segments of trajectories , etc . percival s principle has been derived by klein and co - workers from matrix mechanics @xcite in the classical limit . hamilton s principle also has a reciprocal version @xcite - see next section . for a summary of reciprocity in variational calculus , see appendix i. the textbook euler - lagrange version of maupertuis principle differs from ( 2.2 ) ; the constraint of fixed mean energy @xmath25 is replaced by one of fixed energy @xmath44 , @xmath45 this is not erroneous , since a true trajectory does indeed conserve energy , but it is the source of the inconveniences referred to by jacobi @xcite . because , as we show in the next section , the gmp is equivalent to the hp , and therefore to the equations of motion from which energy conservation follows , it will become clear that energy conservation is a consequence of the gmp ( 2.2 ) , rather than an assumption as in the original mp ( 2.4 ) . it is well known that conservation of energy is a consequence of symmetry under time translation ( noether s theorem ) , either via the lagrangian and equations of motion @xcite , or from the action and hamilton s principle @xcite . similarly energy conservation can be derived directly from the gmp @xcite . in the early sections we assume @xmath31 and that @xmath34 is time - independent ( conservative ) . later these restrictions are relaxed ( see sections 5 and 6 ) . within mechanics one can show that different action principles such as ( 2.1 ) , ( 2.2 ) and ( 2.3 ) are equivalent to each other . this we sketch below ( see @xcite for more details ) . alternatively , one can show @xcite from hamilton s principle ( 2.1 ) that the lagrange equations of motion , in some coordinates are essentially newton s equations in the same set of coordinates . reference @xcite shows that ( 2.4 ) is equivalent to newton s equations , quoting an argument due to lagrange , and in @xcite we derive ( 2.3 ) from similar arguments . on a more lofty level one can derive the action principles from quantum mechanics in the classical limit . dirac and feynman @xcite have derived hamilton s principle from a path integral formulation of quantum mechanics , and similarly the rmp ( 2.3 ) can be derived from wave mechanics ( see @xcite ) . further connections between quantum and classical variational principles are given in sec . the equivalence of hamilton s principle ( 2.1 ) with the general maupertuis principle ( 2.2 ) is worth spelling out in a little more detail . ( the equivalence of the mp with the gmp is discussed in appendix ii ) . the starting point of the derivation is the legendre transformation between the lagrangian of the system and the corresponding hamiltonian , @xmath46 here @xmath47 runs over the various degrees of freedom , and @xmath19 stands for @xmath48 and @xmath49 for @xmath50 . upon integration over time along a trial trajectory starting at @xmath51 and ending at @xmath52 ( where we could have @xmath53 for a closed trajectory ) , and with the definitions given above we obtain @xmath54 where @xmath36 is the duration along the trial trajectory . thus @xmath4 and @xmath3 are also related by a legendre transformation . if we now vary the trial trajectory and the duration @xmath36 , keeping @xmath23 and @xmath24 fixed , and compute the variation of the different terms in ( 2.6 ) , we obtain @xmath55 which is the relation between the different variations . for conservative systems , near a true trajectory hamilton s principle is equivalent to the vanishing of the left hand side . in fact a vanishing left hand side is the unconstrained form @xcite of hamilton s principle ( the uhp - see @xcite for proof ) : @xmath56 where we have used the fact @xmath57 a true trajectory for conservative systems . eq ( 2.8 ) has the unconstrained form @xmath58 , with @xmath59 ( the energy of the true trajectory ) a constant lagrange multiplier . for fixed @xmath36 ( i.e. @xmath60 ) , we recover the hp @xmath61 , and for fixed @xmath3 ( i.e. @xmath62 ) we obtain the reciprocal hamilton principle ( rhp ) @xmath63 the rhp ( principle of least time ) is discussed in detail in ref.@xcite . the right hand side of ( 2.7 ) ( which therefore must also vanish near a true trajectory ) gives the unconstrained form of maupertuis principle ( ump ) for conservative systems : @xmath64 this has the unconstrained form @xmath65 , with @xmath66 ( the duration of the true trajectory ) a constant lagrange multiplier . for fixed @xmath67 ( 2.10 ) gives the gmp of equation ( 2.2 ) while for fixed @xmath4 it gives the reciprocal , the rmp of equation ( 2.3 ) . an alternative derivation of the ump ( 2.10 ) is given in ref.@xcite with traditional variational procedures , employing the general first variation theorem of variational calculus , which includes end - point variations @xcite . equation ( 2.7 ) connecting the different variations is reminiscent of equations of thermodynamics , where two conditions are derived from a single equation . there are many other analogies with thermodynamics , e.g. two actions in mechanics analogous to two free energies in thermodynamics , with a legendre transform relation in each case @xcite , adiabatic processes and reversible processes in both mechanics and thermodynamics , and reciprocal variational principles in both mechanics and thermodynamics ( see appendix i ) . beginning with helmholtz @xcite , many of these analogies have been explored by various authors @xcite . as we have stressed , we hold the end - positions @xmath23 and @xmath24 fixed in all the variational principles discussed above . it is possible to relax these constraints by generalizing further the uhp and ump ( see notes @xcite , @xcite , and @xcite ) , but we shall not need these generalizations for the applications we discuss . the derivation we have sketched shows that the four principles ( 2.1 ) , ( 2.2 ) , ( 2.3 ) , ( 2.9 ) are equivalent to each other . mathematically , the hamilton principles can be regarded as legendre transformations of the maupertuis principles , since the legendre transformation relation @xmath68 allows us to change independent variables from @xmath69 to @xmath36 . thus in classical mechanics we have a set of four variational principles that are symmetric under legendre and reciprocal transformations : @xmath70 + after a short interlude on action principles in semiclassical mechanics we proceed to discuss some simple examples . the rmp ( 2.3 ) is the basis of a very simple semiclassical quantization method . as we shall see , the solution of ( 2.3 ) yields , for the true trajectory or approximations to it , @xmath25 as a function of the action @xmath4 , @xmath71 . for bound motions we then assume the standard einstein - brillouin - keller ( ebk ) @xcite quantization rule for the action over a cycle @xmath72 where @xmath73 , @xmath74 is essentially the morse - maslov index ( e.g. @xmath75 for a harmonic oscillator ) , and @xmath76 is planck s constant . ( ebk ( or torus ) quantization is the generalization of bohr - sommerfeld - wilson quantization from separable to arbitrary integrable systems ) . thus we have expressed @xmath25 as a function of the quantum number @xmath43 , @xmath77 . for multidimensional systems , ( 2.11 ) is applied to each action @xmath78 in @xmath79 , so that we get @xmath80 as a function of the quantum numbers @xmath81 . this method has been found to be reasonably accurate even for nonintegrable systems , where strictly speaking the good actions @xmath78 do not exist . the ump ( 2.10 ) can also be used to obtain semiclassical expressions for @xmath80 . examples are given later in sections 4.1 - 4.3 . here we discuss how to use variational principles to solve practical problems . we use the so - called direct method @xcite of the calculus of variations ( e.g. rayleigh - ritz ) , which operates directly with the variational principle and makes no use of the associated euler - lagrange differential equation . historically @xcite , the method originates with euler , hamilton , rayleigh , ritz and others ( see @xcite for some early references).we assume a trial solution , which contains one or more adjustable parameters @xmath82 . we then use the variational principle to optimize the choice of the @xmath82 . generally speaking , the more parameters @xmath82 , the better the solution . the direct method is well known in quantum mechanics , but is also very useful in classical mechanics , as we shall see . we give a few simple examples in this section , mainly for bound motions ; further simple examples , including for scattering problems , are given in refs . @xcite and in the references therein . the simplest example is the free motion of a particle of unit mass on the line segment @xmath83 to @xmath84 . with the traditional maupertuis principle ( 2.4 ) once we fix the energy @xmath85 there is essentially nothing left to vary . with the gmp ( 2.2 ) or its reciprocal ( 2.3 ) we can choose a variety of trial trajectories . for example we can take velocity @xmath86 on the sub - segment @xmath87 and velocity @xmath88 on the sub - segment @xmath89 . the action @xmath4 is @xmath90 and the mean energy @xmath25 is @xmath91 , where we can vary @xmath86 to change @xmath4 while keeping the mean energy fixed . we then find that @xmath92 , a simple example of energy conservation for this particular trial trajectory . by iteration we can now see that energy is conserved for the whole trajectory on the segment @xmath93 , as a consequence of the general maupertuis principle ( 2.2 ) . an instructive example is the one - dimensional ( 1d ) quartic oscillator , with hamiltonian @xmath94 using a harmonic oscillator trial trajectory with @xmath95 we find for a complete cycle with period @xmath96 @xmath97 @xmath98 from ( 3.3 ) , with the use of the rmp ( 2.3 ) we can obtain the best " frequency @xmath99 solving @xmath100 , which can be substituted into ( 3.3 ) to obtain @xmath25 @xmath101^{1/3 } , \;\;\ ; \bar{e } = \frac{1}{2}(c/{m^2})^{1/3 } ( { 3 w}/{4 \pi})^{4/3 } \eqno(3.4)\ ] ] and the period @xmath36 as a function of mean energy : @xmath102^{1/4}. \eqno(3.5)\ ] ] this variational estimate for the period is in error by @xmath103 when compared with the exact result , as noted in reference @xcite . systematic improvements can be obtained by including terms @xmath104 , @xmath105 , etc . , in the trial trajectory @xmath106 ; see @xcite for a related example . we have used the rmp @xmath107 here since ( 3.3 ) made it very convenient to do so . the gmp @xmath108 and the hp are also viable for this problem , but the original mp @xmath109 is not , since the constraint of fixed @xmath44 leaves essentially no freedom for variation for 1d problems @xcite . one can get around this by relaxing the constraint via a lagrange multiplier , but this is then equivalent to the gmp ( see app . ii ) or the ump . in 2d etc . , the constraint of fixed @xmath44 does allow some freedom for variation , but the constraint is very cumbersome and the gmp is always much more convenient . the use of the action principle ( 2.3 ) to obtain the mean energy as a function of the action ( 3.4 ) or the period as a function of mean energy ( 3.5 ) , with harmonic oscillator trial trajectories , is very similar to the use of the variational principle in quantum mechanics to estimate the energies of states of the quartic oscillator with harmonic oscillator trial wave - functions . we show this explicitly for the eigenstates of the hamiltonian ( 3.1 ) . in both cases an optimum frequency for the trial harmonic case is sought and the final errors are also similar . we start by computing the quantum expectation value of ( 3.1 ) using a harmonic oscillator state with trial frequency @xmath110 , @xmath111 and find the optimum frequency @xmath99 by demanding the vanishing of the derivative of @xmath112 with respect to the frequency . we substitute this frequency in ( 3.6 ) to estimate the energy of excited states @xmath113 taking the asymptotic limit of ( 3.7 ) for @xmath114 and replacing @xmath115 by @xmath4 we obtain the second equation ( 3.4 ) . this is not as trivial as it seems , since ( 3.7 ) was obtained from the quantum variational principle ( for an arbitrary state @xcite ) , while ( 3.4 ) was obtained from a classical action principle . this example illustrates neatly that the two variational principles are related : the reciprocal maupertuis principle is the classical limit of the schrdinger variational principle ( see sec.7 for further discussion ) . the example illustrates also that the classical action principle can be used as a method of approximation , and semiclassically to estimate @xmath116 as described in sec.2.3 . according to ( 2.11 ) , we quantize @xmath117 in ( 3.4 ) semiclassically by the replacement @xmath118 ; as just discussed , this leads to agreement asymptotically ( @xmath119 ) with the quantum result ( 3.7 ) . reference @xcite discusses the similar relation between quantum and classical variations for a different one - dimensional system , with a linear potential . the application of classical action principles to other simple systems is discussed in reference @xcite . the application of quantum variations for excited states has a long history : the earliest reference is mcweeny and coulson , who applied it to the quartic oscillator described above @xcite more than fifty years ago ( for later references see @xcite ) . for a pendulum with two degrees of freedom ( @xmath120 ) , there is an additional term in the kinetic energy compared to that of a plane pendulum , i.e. @xmath121 where @xmath122 is the polar angle ( measured from the downward vertical axis ) and @xmath123 is the azimuthal angle , @xmath124 is the bob mass , @xmath6 the length , and @xmath125 the gravitational acceleration . using the axial symmetry around the @xmath126 ( vertical ) axis , we introduce the cylindrical coordinate @xmath127 , and the angular momentum component @xmath128 , which is a constant of the motion . we also expand @xmath129 , keeping up to quartic terms , which are @xmath130 . this gives @xmath131 where @xmath132 . with two degrees of freedom and two constants of the motion ( @xmath133 and the energy ) , the system is integrable . if the quartic terms are neglected in ( 3.9 ) by assuming @xmath134 , the @xmath135 or @xmath136 motion is that of a 2d isotropic harmonic oscillator with frequency @xmath99 . in particular , an elliptical orbit , with semiaxes @xmath137 and @xmath138 , is fixed in space , and the motion is periodic . if the quartic terms are not negligible , the oscillator frequency shifts from @xmath99 to a lower value @xmath110 , as in the plane pendulum case , where @xmath139 and the orbit precesses in the prograde sense with frequency @xmath140 , where @xmath141 the motion is now in general quasiperiodic . the precession is one of the major sources of error to be eliminated in the design of foucault pendula @xcite . ( the foucault pendulum is discussed in sec . because the precession rate is @xmath130 , this precession is particularly relevant for recently developed short foucault pendula , which are less than 1 m in length . equations ( 3.10 ) and ( 3.11 ) have been derived by perturbation theory @xcite . to derive ( 3.10 ) and ( 3.11 ) variationally @xcite , we first choose a trial trajectory ; we take an ellipse which is closed in the coordinate system @xmath142 which rotates with respect to the fixed @xmath143 system with the ( unknown ) precession frequency @xmath140 . in the @xmath142 system we therefore have @xmath144 and @xmath145 , where @xmath110 may differ from @xmath99 . because the @xmath142 and @xmath146 systems differ by a rotation , we have @xmath147 , and therefore our trial trajectory in the fixed coordinate system is @xmath148 to apply the maupertuis principles , we calculate the action @xmath4 and mean energy @xmath25 over one period @xmath149 of the rotating ellipse , @xmath150 where @xmath151 denotes a time average over one period , and @xmath32 and @xmath34 are given by ( 3.9 ) . the averages of the terms in ( 3.9 ) are easily calculated using ( 3.12 ) , which gives @xmath152 @xmath153 @xmath154 the precession frequency @xmath140 can be related to the angular momentum using @xmath155 , and @xmath156 from ( 3.14 ) , giving @xmath157 as initial and final positions 1 and 2 ( see fig.1 ) , we take two successive aphelia at @xmath158 , i.e. @xmath159 and @xmath160 , where @xmath161.the positions 1 and 2 and hence @xmath137 and @xmath162 are thus fixed , which leaves @xmath138 and @xmath110 available as variational parameters . note that ( 3.15 ) then implies that @xmath133 is varied with the trial trajectory ( although it is a constant of the motion on the individual trial trajectories ) . we find it easiest to use the unconstrained version of the maupertuis principles [ i.e. the ump ( 2.10 ) ] , @xmath163 , where @xmath164 is the time to reach position 2 from position 1 . thus we use @xmath165 where , choosing units such that @xmath166 , @xmath167 , @xmath168 , we have from ( 3.13 ) to ( 3.15 ) @xmath169 @xmath170 and @xmath171 the first of the variational equations ( 3.16 ) is satisfied identically by ( 3.17 ) and ( 3.18 ) , and gives no useful information . from the second , setting @xmath172 , where @xmath173 is the frequency shift , and retaining terms only to second order in @xmath137 and @xmath138 , i.e. , @xmath130 in general units , we get the condition @xmath174 when @xmath175 , ( 3.19 ) gives @xmath176 as it should [ recall the plane pendulum result @xcite ] . by symmetry , @xmath173 must reduce to @xmath177 when @xmath178 . this requires that @xmath179 in ( 3.19 ) , and from this result we then get @xmath180 from ( 3.19 ) . when we restore the dimensional quantities @xmath99 and @xmath6 , these results agree with ( 3.10 ) and ( 3.11 ) , so that with a harmonic oscillator trial trajectory , the variational method gives results correct to @xmath130 . hamilton s principle can also be applied to this problem . here , we need the hamilton action @xmath181 , where @xmath36 ( and hence @xmath110 ) is now fixed , in addition to the positions 1 and 2 ( and hence @xmath137 and @xmath162 ) . this leaves @xmath138 available as a variational parameter , and setting @xmath182 leads to the same results as above . more complicated examples are easy to find , and are especially interesting in multidimensional systems which exhibit chaotic motion . such systems are nonintegrable , and have fewer constants of the motion than the number of degrees of freedom . we illustrate the use of classical and semiclassical variational principles together with the application of quantum variational principles to excited states . the 2d @xmath184 oscillator is a simple example of this class , which has been studied in the literature for some time ( see , e.g. @xcite ) . there is only one constant of the motion , the energy . classically , most trajectories in this system are chaotic @xcite . fig.2 shows the contours of the @xmath184 potential , and fig.3 shows a typical ( chaotic ) classical trajectory . . the darkened contour corresponds to @xmath185 . ( from ref.@xcite ) ] -axis . the trajectory eventually reverses its @xmath186-direction and returns to the vicinity of the origin before entering another arm of the potential . ( from ref.@xcite ) ] refs.@xcite give classical and semiclassical discussions of the motion using the rmp . here we discuss the quantum states using variational methods for the excited states , as done above for a simpler example . comparison with the semiclassical results is given later . the hamiltonian is @xmath187 we choose units where @xmath166 and @xmath188 , where @xmath189 is the potential . below we also choose @xmath190 . we take as an approximation a separable trial wave - function @xmath191 @xmath192 where the wave - function @xmath193 is an eigenstate of a harmonic oscillator with frequency @xmath194 : @xmath195 the frequencies @xmath194 and @xmath196 are variational parameters , which will differ from state to state , and as a result the set ( 4.2 ) is nonorthogonal . the computation of matrix elements and expectation values with the wave functions ( 4.3 ) is rather easy , @xmath197 and therefore the expectation value of the hamiltonian ( 4.1 ) with the wave - functions ( 4.2 ) is @xmath198 . \eqno(4.5)\ ] ] we then find the best frequencies @xmath194 and @xmath196 by setting to zero the partial derivatives of @xmath112 with respect to the two @xmath110 s to obtain the frequency conditions @xmath199 from which we obtain @xmath200 eqs . ( 4.7 ) and ( 4.3 ) show that at the variational minimum the ratio of the two frequencies is rational and the mean energy of the @xmath186-oscillator is the same as the mean energy of the @xmath201-oscillator . it follows immediately that the mean kinetic energies of the two oscillators are also equal to each other at the variational minimum : @xmath202 . from ( 4.6 ) we also find @xmath203^{1/3 } , \eqno(4.8)\ ] ] which gives the separate frequencies @xmath204 and the variational estimate for the energy : @xmath205^{2/3}. \eqno(4.10)\ ] ] therefore the variational states are labelled by the two integers @xmath206 and @xmath207 and the energy at high quantum numbers increases as the two thirds power of their product . the estimate ( 4.10 ) can also be obtained semiclassically by using the rmp to find @xmath208 , and then quantizing the actions @xmath78 with the ebk relation ( 2.11 ) ; see ref.@xcite for a detailed discussion . it is to be noted that this method yields the quite reasonable first approximation ( 4.10 ) for @xmath209 despite the fact that strictly speaking the good actions @xmath210 and @xmath211 do not exist for the @xmath184 oscillator . in essence , one is approximating a chaotic trajectory by a quasiperiodic one , and the rmp picks out the best such trial trajectory @xcite . the estimate ( 4.10 ) differs only in the leading coefficient , 3/2 vs. 1.405 , from a semiclassical adiabatic formula ( sca ) obtained by martens et al @xcite . the difference between the two estimates is about @xmath212 . as noted by martens et al @xcite formula ( 4.10 ) gives rise to degeneracies . for example @xmath213 = ( 7,0 ) , ( 0,7 ) , ( 2,1 ) , ( 1,2 ) give the same energies - a four - fold degeneracy . however , numerical estimates of the first 50 energy levels , obtained in @xcite , do not show such high degeneracies . also , because the symmetry group of the hamiltonian @xmath214 ( a fourfold axis of rotation , and four reflection planes ) has only one- and two - dimensional irreducible representations @xcite , we expect at most two - fold degeneracy . we shall see that the basis ( 4.2 ) permits an evaluation of the splitting of these spurious degeneracies . the pattern of degeneracies is easy to understand if the bracket is rewritten @xmath215 = n/4,\ ] ] where the number @xmath216 ( theprincipal " quantum number ) , is an odd integer . the degeneracy pattern is determined by the decomposition of @xmath216 into prime factors . for example @xmath213=(2,1 ) corresponds to @xmath216 = 15 which can be factored as @xmath217 , @xmath218 , @xmath219 , @xmath220 and these products correspond to ( 7,0 ) etc . if @xmath216 is a prime number there are only two states , corresponding to @xmath221 and @xmath222 , while every nontrivial factorization of a nonprime @xmath216 allows further states . the integer @xmath216 belongs to one of two possible classes : @xmath223 or @xmath224 . for the case @xmath225 ( e.g. @xmath216 = 15 ) one of @xmath226 is even and the other is odd . this class of states eo and oe ( of @xcite ) corresponds to the two dimensional irreducible representation of @xmath214 . for @xmath227 ( e.g. @xmath216=21 ) the two quantum numbers @xmath228 are both even or both odd ( e.g. @xmath228 = ( 10,0 ) or ( 0,10 ) or ( 1,3 ) or ( 3,1 ) for @xmath216=21 , which is therefore four - fold degenerate ) this degeneracy is split into states of symmetry eee , eeo , ooe and ooo , in the notation of martens et al @xcite for the one dimensional irreducible representations . in this notation the first two letters give respectively the parity ( even or odd ) of @xmath206 and @xmath207 ( or equivalently the behaviour of the wave - function under the reflections ( @xmath229 , @xmath230 ) , while the third letter stands for the behavior under the interchange of @xmath186 with @xmath201 . we discuss later the splitting of degeneracies resulting from the expression ( 4.10 ) . at this point we wish only to note that the degeneracy grows very slowly with @xmath216 , like lnln@xmath216 , and even for @xmath216 quite large where quasiclassical behaviour is expected ( say @xmath231 ) the typical number of degenerate states is quite modest , 4 - 6 . the main points of discussion arising from the result ( 4.10 ) are the splitting of the degenerate levels , perturbative corrections to the variational energies , and the density of states implied by this formula . for the first fifty low lying states one has the accurate numerical estimates of martens et al @xcite with which to compare . we can improve the variational result ( 4.10 ) if we rewrite the hamiltonian @xmath7 ( 4.1 ) in the form @xmath232 here , the perturbation @xmath34 is the last term above , and its effect is already included in first order , in the variational estimate ( 4.10 ) . therefore the first correction comes in second order in @xmath34 . we must also remember that that the frequencies @xmath233 are appropriate to a fixed pair of quantum numbers @xmath213 , and change if we go to a different pair . the simplest way to do perturbation theory in these circumstances is to estimate corrections to each state @xmath213 by considering a set of orthogonal intermediate states @xmath234 all with the same frequency @xmath233 appropriate to the state @xmath213 which we consider . therefore we take the second order correction @xmath235}. \eqno(4.12)\ ] ] due to the form of @xmath34 ( quadratic in the coordinates @xmath143 ) , we must have @xmath236 or @xmath237 or @xmath238 for nonzero contributions and similarly for @xmath239 . it is an interesting property of the variational solution that only intermediate states with both @xmath240 different from @xmath206 and @xmath239 different from @xmath207 give nonvanishing contributions , because of the frequency conditions . this can be seen from an evaluation of matrix elements with only one quantum number different , for example @xmath241 , but @xmath242 . then one finds @xmath243 , \eqno(4.12^{'})\ ] ] and the bracket on the right hand side vanishes because of ( 4.6 ) . only the perturbation @xmath244 contributes to nonvanishing matrix elements . there are only four intermediate states which contribute : @xmath245 , where @xmath246 , etc . therefore ( 4.12 ) becomes after a little computation @xmath247 and @xmath248^{2/3 } , \eqno(4.14)\ ] ] where @xmath249 denotes a second - order shift and @xmath250 denotes the energy up to the second - order . therefore , in second - order perturbation theory , the coefficient @xmath251 is diminished by about @xmath252 to 1.437 , closer to the adiabatic result 1.405 of martens et al @xcite . the remaining difference is about @xmath253 . the degeneracies of ( 4.14 ) are still the same as those of ( 4.10 ) . if we apply perturbation theory to the ground state @xmath254 we find @xmath255 the sequence ( 4.15 ) indicates that the perturbation expansion does not converge , and it is a good idea to stop at second order . the accurate numerical result for @xmath256 ( from @xcite ) is 0.5541 , which shows that stopping at second order gives an error of about @xmath257 for the ground state . some examples of the estimates @xmath258 , and @xmath259 are given in table 1 , and compared with numerical estimates from @xcite , for a set of states which are also relevant to the next section . * table 1 * [ cols="^,^,^,^,^,^,^",options="header " , ] comparison of selected energy levels calculated via quantum and semiclassical methods demonstrating the failure of the simple variational calculation to produce level splitting observed in the quantum results.(from ref.@xcite ) in this section we consider nonconservative mechanical systems . for example consider a system of particles moving in the time - dependent external field , or a system whose parameters depend explicitly on time . other examples include time - dependent constraints , e.g. a bead on a rotating hoop whose angular velocity is a prescribed function of time , and variable mass systems ( for which @xmath260 in general @xcite ) . such systems are not closed and the energy is not conserved . the evolution of a nonconservative system is completely determined by a time - dependent lagrangian @xmath261 or by a time - dependent hamiltonian @xmath262 . ( we exclude dissipative systems from our discussion . we do note that lagrangians and hamiltonians have been found for such systems in some cases @xcite , so that the action principles discussed here would apply in these cases . alternatively @xcite , dissipative terms can be added to the lagrange equations of motion or to the hamilton principle . ) @xmath7 and @xmath6 are related to each other by the legendre transformation ( see eq . ( 2.5 ) ) @xmath263 locally these lead to the usual euler - lagrange or hamilton equations of motion that govern the dynamics of the system . we consider the global description of nonconservative systems . it is well known that the hamilton principle @xmath264 is applicable for nonconservative systems as well as for conservative ones . here subscript @xmath36 reminds us that variations near the actual path are constrained by fixing the travel time @xmath36 from the initial point @xmath265 to the final point @xmath52 . again we have chosen @xmath266 and @xmath267 , and , as before , it is understood here and below that the end - positions @xmath23 and @xmath24 are also fixed . as before , we can relax the constraint of fixed @xmath36 and rewrite ( 5.2)@xcite as an unconstrained hamilton principle ( uhp ) @xmath268 where the lagrange multiplier @xmath269 is the true value of the energy at the time of arrival at the final point @xmath270 . ( elsewhere in this paper @xmath269 is denoted variously as @xmath271 , @xmath272 or @xmath273 ; see notes @xcite and @xcite ) . we assume that all trial trajectories start at the same time @xmath274 and also have the same end positions @xmath23 and @xmath24 . using eq.(2.7 ) , which is derived from ( 5.1 ) as before , we transform the uhp ( 5.3 ) to the form @xmath275\delta{t } = 0 . \eqno(5.4)\ ] ] this is the unconstrained maupertuis principle ( ump ) for nonconservative systems , which seems not to have been given in the literature explicitly ( it is implicit in an appendix in @xcite - see also @xcite ) . it relates three variations - the variation of mean energy @xmath276 , the variation of the action @xmath4 and the variation of the travel time @xmath36 . the lagrange multipliers are the true travel time @xmath36 and the difference of energy and mean energy of the true trajectory at the final point , @xmath277 $ ] . the latter can be rewritten as @xmath278= < t\frac{\partial h}{\partial t } > , \eqno(5.5)\ ] ] where the bar and brackets @xmath279 both denote a time average over the interval ( 0,t ) . the generalized ump ( 5.4 ) can also be derived by traditional variational procedures ( @xcite , eq.(a.6 ) ) . one can derive constrained principles from ( 5.4 ) as before , e.g. @xmath280 , but these would be complicated to use in practice because of the severe constraints on the trial trajectories . the version @xmath281 is closest to the original maupertuis principle . the constrained principle @xmath282\right)_{e(0),e(t)}=0\ ] ] is mentioned by whittaker @xcite , and is easily derived from ( 5.4 ) and ( 5.5 ) . but since ( 5.4 ) is also valid without fixing @xmath283 and @xmath269 , ( 5.4 ) is more convenient . formally the unconstrained maupertuis principle ( 5.4 ) is equivalent to the hamilton principle , but it also appears too complicated to be useful in practice . this is not quite true and we demonstrate how the ump can be used for adiabatic perturbations . for simplicity we start with a one - dimensional periodic system that depends on a parameter @xmath284 . let @xmath284 vary with time adiabatically , i.e. the change @xmath285 during a period of oscillation @xmath36 . it is well known that in this case the energy @xmath44 as well as the period of oscillation @xmath36 depend slightly on time , but the action @xmath286 over a cycle , where @xmath287 remains constant to an excellent approximation ( adiabatic invariant ) when the parameter @xmath284 varies . consider what kind of information can be extracted from the ump ( 5.4 ) . both the energy @xmath44 and the period @xmath36 of an actual motion are functions of the action @xmath286 ( recall the action - angle variables ) : @xmath288 , @xmath289 . consider two actual trajectories with actions @xmath286 and @xmath290 as two trial trajectories for the ump ( 5.4 ) . then the variational equation can be rewritten as a differential equation @xmath291 it is more convenient to rewrite this in terms of the frequency @xmath292 , @xmath293 this equation generalizes the standard relation @xcite for integrable conservative systems @xmath294 to integrable nonconservative systems . up to this point ( 5.7 ) and ( 5.8 ) are general and valid for any nonconservative system for which a good action can be defined . consider now the adiabatic regime where the variation of the parameter @xmath295 over the short period @xmath36 , @xmath296 , is much less than the parameter itself : @xmath297 . in this case @xmath298 where the averaging @xmath299 is to be performed at a fixed value of @xmath300 since @xmath301 varies little over a period @xmath36 . the action @xmath286 is conserved for any given parameter @xmath301 , and hence the derivative @xmath302 is also a constant of the motion . as a result in this approximation we get @xmath303 in the same approximation we have for @xmath304 in ( 5.8 ) @xmath305 thus to the first order approximation in @xmath306 we can rewrite ( 5.8 ) as @xmath307[\frac { d}{di } ( \frac{1}{\omega^{(0)}}\frac{\partial e}{\partial \lambda})- \frac{\partial e}{\partial \lambda}\frac{d}{di } ( \frac{1}{\omega^{(0)}})],\ ] ] or finally as @xmath308 here @xmath309 is the zero - order term , and @xmath310 is the variation of the parameter @xmath301 during the given period . we get corrections ( of the first - order in the nonadiabaticity parameter @xmath311 ) to the frequency of oscillation , for adiabatic systems . the result seems very simple . it appears that @xmath312 is a continuous function of time @xmath16 and we calculate some average frequency over the period . but actually @xmath312 is not always a continuous function of time ; it is a parameter of a ( slightly ) aperiodic system . thus ( 5.10 ) is nontrivial in general . to illustrate these results it is instructive to consider a simple exactly solvable example . we consider the 1d motion of a perfectly elastic ball of mass @xmath124 bouncing between two planes . we suppose that one plane is fixed and the other is slowly moving with constant velocity @xmath313 . we suppose also that the planes are heavy enough so that they are unaffected by collisions with the ball . the distance between the two planes @xmath314 is the adiabatic parameter . let us define a as the motion of the ball from the fixed plane to the moving plane , collision , and the motion of the ball in the backward direction up to the collision with the fixed plane . the n-@xmath315 cycle can be described in the following way . at time @xmath316 ( beginning of the cycle ) the ball has velocity @xmath317 , and the distance between planes is @xmath318 . at time @xmath319 the ball collides with the moving plane and after the collision it moves to the fixed plane with velocity @xmath320 ( the collision with the fixed plane is elastic and the backward velocity is equal to the forward velocity after collision , i.e. @xmath321 ) . the backward motion takes time @xmath322 . the period of the whole cycle is @xmath323 . at time @xmath324 ( the initial time for ( n+1)-th cycle ) the distance between the two planes is equal to @xmath325 . this means that @xmath326 is an exact ( adiabatic ) invariant . it easy to see that the action @xmath286 is proportional to this invariant , @xmath327 i.e. the action @xmath286 is an exact ( adiabatic ) invariant for our special initial condition @xcite . in terms of the action @xmath286 and the adiabatic parameter @xmath6 the complete set of relevant quantities is as follows : @xmath328 @xmath329 ^ 2,\ ] ] @xmath330 i.e. @xmath331 is linear function of the nonadiabaticity parameter @xmath332 and the approximate relation ( 5.10 ) must be exact here . indeed , we have @xmath333 , @xmath334 and @xmath335 thus the approximate relation ( 5.10 ) is valid here . it is also not difficult to check after a little algebra that in the exact relation ( 5.8 ) all higher powers of @xmath313 cancel each other and the linear approximation is exact . if @xmath336 is not extremely small , @xmath286 ceases to be an adiabatic invariant and the system becomes nonintegrable . if @xmath337 is varied nonadiabatically and periodically around @xmath338 , the system ( termed the fermi model @xcite ) can show steady energy growth and chaotic motion . the generalization of ( 5.10 ) to multidimensional integrable systems with actions @xmath339, ... ,@xmath340 is evident , as is the generalization to multiparameter systems , with parameters @xmath341 . the @xmath342 corrections in @xmath312 have been derived by other methods @xcite , but in different forms from ( 5.10 ) . if we assume @xmath295 is periodic , with a long period @xmath343 , the @xmath342 terms in @xmath312 , when integrated over @xmath344 , define the @xmath345 , the classical analogue of the quantum berry phase @xcite . the hannay angle is the extra ( geometric ) phase undergone by the system in one cycle of @xmath295 , in addition to the more obvious dynamical phase @xmath346 obtained by integrating the instantaneous frequency @xmath347 . in general one requires more than one @xmath301-type parameter to obtain a nonvanishing result for @xmath345 , but hannay and berry and coworkers give a few examples @xcite where one parameter suffices . we discuss two examples with nonvanishing @xmath345 . consider a bead of mass @xmath124 sliding without friction on a closed planar wire loop which is slowly rotating with angular velocity @xmath140 in the horizontal plane . for a loop of arbitrary shape , hannay and berry @xcite show that the hannay angle @xmath345 defined above is given by @xmath348 , where @xmath349 is the area and @xmath6 the perimeter of the loop . for a circular loop rotating about an axis perpendicular to the plane of the loop and through the center , @xmath345 is simply @xmath350 , as is clear intuitively : the `` starting line '' for the particle moves ahead by @xmath351 while the particle rapidly slides around the loop . plane with angular velocity @xmath352 about axis through @xmath353 perpendicular to the @xmath143 plane . at @xmath316 , the particle starts with @xmath354 and the rotating @xmath355 axis ( a diameter ) coincides with the fixed axis @xmath186.,width=226 ] we consider a circular loop of radius @xmath356 ( fig.8 ) , but with the vertical axis of rotation through a point @xmath353 on the wire instead of the center @xmath357 of the loop , to make the answer less obvious . the adiabatic parameter here is the prescribed orientation of the loop @xmath295 , where @xmath358 is small . we do not at this stage assume @xmath359 is constant . using the horizontal @xmath360 lab - frame ( fig.8 ) , we can easily write the lagrangian , which is just the lab kinetic energy of the particle . using @xmath122 in fig.8 as the generalized coordinate we find @xmath361 \;\ ; . \eqno(5.11)\ ] ] from ( 5.11 ) we obtain the equation of motion @xmath362 if the loop rotates uniformly ( @xmath363 ) , ( 5.12 ) is just the pendulum equation , as one expects intuitively . because we are using a rotating coordinate system ( @xmath122 is measured from @xmath364 ) @xmath6 is not equal to @xmath365 in this system , so that the hamiltonian @xmath7 is not equal to the energy ( @xmath366 ) in this system either . to find @xmath7 , we first calculate the canonical momentum @xmath367 , where @xmath368 and then @xmath369 is @xmath370 in terms of the canonical variables @xmath122 , @xmath371 the hamiltonian @xmath7 is @xmath372 where we drop @xmath373 terms since we assume @xmath374 . we can not apply ( 5.10 ) as it stands , since @xmath375 was used in the derivation . the generalization to include cases where @xmath376 is @xmath377 where @xmath39 is the average of @xmath7 over the fast motion ( here @xmath122 ) . alternatively , we can use ( 5.10 ) , with now @xmath378 . from ( 5.15 ) we have @xmath379 since @xmath122 varies rapidly and @xmath371 is nearly constant . we now assume @xmath140 is constant . for @xmath380 , @xmath39 is a function of the good action @xmath381 only ( no @xmath122 dependence ) , and when @xmath382 we see @xmath371 remains a good action . note that @xmath39 is independent of angle @xmath301 , so that the second term in ( 5.16 ) will not contribute to @xmath383 , which is @xmath384 the total phase undergone after a long return time @xmath385 is thus @xmath386 the first term is the dynamical phase , the second is the hannay ( geometric ) phase . for a foucault pendulum the hannay angle is the angle by which the plane of the pendulum vibration shifts in one day , i.e. @xmath387 , where @xmath122 is the co - latitude of the point on earth where the pendulum is located . this is a clockwise rotation in the northern hemisphere . this result for @xmath388 has been derived by berry @xcite and others @xcite by various arguments . there are also some pre - hannay purely geometric arguments for the foucault pendulum precession @xcite . here we show the result follows simply from ( 5.16 ) . we consider a pendulum of length @xmath6 and bob mass @xmath124 oscillating at a point on the earth s surface with co - latitude @xmath122 . we use axes x , y , z attached to the earth , with x , y in the horizontal plane and z vertical . when at rest in the x , y , z system , the pendulum hangs along the z - axis , and when in motion the bob oscillates very nearly in the x , y plane . neglecting the z motion and assuming @xmath389 is small , where @xmath390 is the earth s angular velocity , we easily find @xcite the approximate horizontal equations of motion @xmath391 where @xmath392 . we have kept the @xmath393 coriolis terms , but dropped the @xmath373 centrifugal terms , since @xmath140 is small compared to the pendulum frequency @xmath99 . here @xmath140 is the local vertical component of the earth s angular velocity . we are interested in particular in the orbit precession rate predicted by ( 5.20 ) . it is easily checked that ( 5.20 ) follow from the lagrangian @xmath394 and of course ( 5.21 ) can be derived directly @xcite . changing to polar coordinates @xmath395 , @xmath123 via @xmath396 , @xmath397 changes @xmath6 to the form @xmath398 two constants of the motion are obvious from ( 5.22 ) : since @xmath6 does not depend on @xmath123 , @xmath399 is a constant , where @xmath400 and because @xmath6 does not depend on @xmath16 explicitly , the hamiltonian @xmath401 is a constant , where @xmath402 and @xmath403 two constants of the motion with two degrees of freedom imply that the system is integrable and that two good actions exist . to express @xmath7 in terms of the canonical variables @xmath395 , @xmath123 , @xmath404 , @xmath399 we use ( 5.23 ) and @xmath405 to get @xmath406 where again we drop an @xmath373 term . we wish to use ( 5.16 ) ( not ( 5.10 ) here as @xmath407 ) to find the frequencies @xmath408 and @xmath409 , where @xmath301 is the orientational angle of the earth multiplied by @xmath129 . note that for @xmath410 , ( 5.26 ) is simply the hamiltonian for an isotropic 2d harmonic oscillator . calculation of the actions for the 2d oscillator , @xmath411 and @xmath412 , is a standard exercise @xcite , and the hamiltonian @xmath413 in terms of these actions is @xmath414 the term @xmath415 in ( 5.26 ) will not disturb the good actions , so that ( 5.26 ) becomes @xmath416 application of ( 5.16 ) with @xmath417 and @xmath418 then gives @xmath419 where a positive ( + ) frequency in @xmath420 corresponds to a counterclockwise rotation . note that the foucault precession frequency @xmath421 is true for orbits of any shape , e.g. near linear ( the usual case ) , elliptical , or circular . the factor of 2 in @xmath422 in ( 5.29 ) is clear intuitively : for @xmath423 , in one circuit of an elliptical orbit , @xmath395 goes through two cycles while @xmath123 goes through one . computing the phase of the pendulum @xmath424 after one complete rotation of the earth ( period @xmath425 ) then gives @xmath426 the term @xmath427 is the dynamical phase @xmath428 and @xmath429 is the geometric hannay angle @xmath388 . the examples in this section and the previous one led to a nonvanishing hannay angle @xmath345 . it is easy to show that the earlier example ( particle in a 1d box with a slowly moving wall ) gives a vanishing result . the same is true for a particle in a slowly rotating 1d box ( fixed walls ) . golin @xcite has proved that , for 1d systems with one adiabatic parameter @xmath301 , one always has @xmath430 unless @xmath301 undergoes a rotational excursion through @xmath351 . however the proof does not cover our rotating 1d box example ( which has a hard wall potential ) , since golin @xcite assumes a smooth potential . the case of a slowly rotating 2d box of elliptical shape has been worked out by koiller @xcite , and gives a nonvanishing @xmath345 depending in a complicated way on the area of the box . nonintegrable systems have fewer than @xmath21 independent constants of the motion or good actions , where @xmath21 is the number of degrees of freedom . for such systems , at least some of the possible motions are chaotic , and for these at least some of the good action variables do not exist . hence we have not been able to proceed rigorously beyond the general relation ( 5.4 ) for chaotic motions . ( despite the nonexistence of good actions @xmath286 for nonintegrable systems , formal use of them and their adiabatic invariance have been used successfully in semiclassical quantization schemes ; see sections 2.3 , 3.1 , 4.1 , 4.3 and ref . @xcite for a method based on the maupertuis principles for conservative systems , and see refs . @xcite for a method based on adiabatic switching . ) as stated , we do not have rigorous arguments to draw consequences from the ump ( 5.4 ) for nonintegrable systems , but some heuristic arguments can be given . for example , by choosing @xmath431 to vary slowly and linearly with @xmath16 , e.g. @xmath432 , where @xmath306 is small , we can the adiabatic invariance of the action @xmath286 for a 1d periodic system ( earlier we that @xmath286 is an adiabatic invariant for such systems ) . further , by considering long trajectories of multidimensional systems , which start and end in some small region in phase space , and which are not quite periodic in general , we can formally show that , in a poincar cycle time or in the limit @xmath433 the long - path action @xmath4 is an adiabatic invariant for quasiperiodic and chaotic trajectories of multidimensional systems . ehrenfest @xcite has previously shown that @xmath4 is an adiabatic invariant for multidimensional periodic systems . for systems , the phase volume @xmath434 is an adiabatic invariant ( see next paragraph ) , and since the adiabatic invariant is apparently unique for such systems ( kasuga @xcite ) , it should be possible to derive the adiabatic invariance of @xmath4 from that of @xmath140 for these systems , but we have been so far unable to do this @xcite . we note that counterparts of the hannay angle have been established for adiabatically evolving nonintegrable @xcite and ergodic @xcite systems . for one limiting case , complete chaos ( ergodic motion ) where the energy is the only constant of the motion , and long trajectories typically cover essentially the whole energy surface , a rigorous adiabatic invariant has been found @xcite , i.e. the phase volume @xmath435 , enclosed by the energy surface @xmath436 : @xmath437 , \eqno ( 5.31)\ ] ] where @xmath438 is the step function , which is unity for positive argument . ( for multidimensional systems , @xmath439 stands for @xmath440 . ) if @xmath441 depends on a slowly varying parameter @xmath295 so that @xmath442 , then @xmath443 . the adiabatic invariance of @xmath434 is intuitively plausible @xcite . first consider the initial ( @xmath316 ) energy surface @xmath444 , and its image under an time development ( i.e.not necessarily slow ) . the final ( image ) surface at the time @xmath36 is not in general a constant energy surface , and hence not in general a dynamical surface . however , by liouville s theorem the volume enclosed by the final surface is equal to that enclosed by the initial surface . the time - development from @xmath316 to @xmath445 sufficiently slow then at each stage the surface which has evolved from the @xmath316 surface a dynamical surface , by definition of adiabatic evolution , where allowed motions transform into allowed motions @xcite . in this case the final @xmath445 surface is a true constant energy dynamical surface , and hence @xmath446 from liouville s theorem . for ergodic systems , there are no good quantum numbers except for the energy - ordering quantum number @xmath447 , where @xmath448 . a rough but useful semiclassical quantization scheme for ergodic systems based on @xmath434 is the weyl rule @xcite @xmath449 which implicitly defines @xmath450 . this is just a restatement of the early rule due to planck @xcite that each quantum state occupies a volume of size @xmath451 in classical phase space . in practice , various improvements such as replacing @xmath216 by @xmath452 as in ( 2.4 ) are used @xcite . more subtle improvements can be obtained from gutzwiller s trace formula @xcite . these relate fluctuations from the smooth dependence of @xmath44 on @xmath216 predicted by ( 5.32 ) to the classical periodic orbits . in cases such as the @xmath184 potential , where the classical @xmath434 diverges @xcite due to the infinite channels of the potential ( see fig.1 ) , one can estimate the smooth part of @xmath453 ( the cumulative number of states up to @xmath44 ) quantum mechanically @xcite at low energy by an asymptotic expansion @xcite , with leading terms @xmath454 and @xmath455 , where @xmath456 is dimensionless . application of the generalization of ( 5.32 ) , i.e. @xmath457 , then gives reasonable estimates of the low - lying state energies @xcite . another consequence of the ump ( 5.4 ) is the classical version of the hellmann - feynman theorem @xcite @xmath458 here @xmath459 depends on a parameter @xmath301 , so that the energy @xmath460 depends on @xmath301 , as well as on the ( constant ) action @xmath286 , and @xmath461 denotes a time - average over a period @xmath462 at fixed action @xmath286 . we assume a one - dimensional periodic system for simplicity . the quantum version of the theorem @xcite is nowadays much better known , i.e. @xmath463 where @xmath464 , and where the hamiltonian operator @xmath465 depends on some parameter @xmath301 , so that the energy eigenvalue @xmath466 and eigenfunction @xmath467 do also , because of @xmath468 proof of ( 5.34 ) is simple ; we apply @xmath469 to both sides of the relation @xmath470 , and note that the two terms involving @xmath471 add to zero because of ( 5.35 ) , the hermiticity of @xmath465 , and the fact that we assume @xmath472 for all @xmath301 . it is clear that ( 5.33 ) is the classical limit of ( 5.34 ) , since as @xmath473 ( or @xmath474 ) @xmath475 approaches a time average over a period , and fixing @xmath43 corresponds to fixing @xmath286 , since @xmath476 . to derive ( 5.33 ) from ( 5.4 ) we consider @xmath431 to evolve adiabatically , so that @xmath301 and @xmath36 in ( 5.4 ) can be related . the derivation is intricate , however , and it is simpler to proceed instead from the rmp ( 2.3 ) for conservative systems . we apply ( 2.3 ) to two periodic trajectories of @xmath477 , the true one with period @xmath478 , and a virtual one taken as the true trajectory of @xmath479 with period @xmath480 . since first - order variations in @xmath481 vanish ( at fixed @xmath482 ) , we have @xmath483 where @xmath484 is an average over the trajectory with period @xmath478 , and it is understood that @xmath286 is the same for both @xmath484 and @xmath485 . from ( 5.36 ) we get for @xmath486 to @xmath487 accuracy @xmath488 again neglecting @xmath489 terms we have @xmath490 eq(5.37 ) yields @xmath491 , and since @xmath492 for the true trajectory we get @xmath493 , the hellmann - feynman relation ( 5.33 ) apart from notation . as a simple example of ( 5.33 ) consider a 1d harmonic oscillator , with hamiltonian @xmath494 and @xmath495 , where @xmath496 is the angular frequency . choose @xmath497 , the force constant . the left side of ( 5.33 ) is @xmath498 and the right side is @xmath499 . thus we have @xmath500 , as is well known from the virial theorem @xcite . if we choose @xmath501 , we find similarly @xmath502 . as a second example , consider the bound motion of a 1d system with hamiltonian @xmath503 . we change variables @xmath504 via the transformation @xmath505 , @xmath506 , where @xmath301 is an arbitrary scale factor . this transformation is canonical and preserves the hamiltonian @xcite , i.e. @xmath507 , where @xmath508 the energy of a given state of motion is unchanged by the change from @xmath7 to @xmath509 for any value of @xmath301 . we now use ( 5.38 ) in the hellmann - feynman relation ( 5.33 ) . the left hand side vanishes . the right hand side derivative is @xmath510 where @xmath511 , and we have reverted to the original variables in the second form . hence we get @xmath512 i.e. the virial theorem for an arbitrary potential @xmath513 . hamilton s principle is widely used in classical relativistic mechanics and in the classical theory of electromagnetic and gravitational fields to derive covariant equations of motion ( see , e.g.@xcite ) . as for maupertuis principle , it is widely believed that it is not well suited for that purpose because when operating with the energy one loses explicit covariance . in this section we demonstrate , first , how to use maupertuis principle for the derivation of the covariant equations of motion and , the second , how to use it for the solution of specific problems . consider a relativistic particle with mass @xmath124 and charge @xmath514 moving in an arbitrary external electromagnetic field , described by a four - potential with contravariant components @xmath515 , and covariant components @xmath516 , where @xmath123 and @xmath517 ( for @xmath518 ) are the usual scalar and vector potentials . hamilton s action for this system can be written in the lorentz invariant form @xcite @xmath519 where we use the sign of lanczos @xcite for @xmath3 , opposite to that of landau and lifshitz @xcite . the sign can be chosen arbitrarily ; our choice allows us to use below the orthodox definitions @xmath520 and @xmath521 . the four - dimensional path runs from the initial point @xmath522 to the final point @xmath523 in four - dimensional space - time with corresponding proper times @xmath524 and @xmath525 . here @xmath526 is the infinitesimal interval of the path ( or of the proper time ) @xmath527 , the metric has signature @xmath528 and we use the summation convention and units with @xmath529 , where @xmath530 is the velocity of light . @xmath3 is itself not gauge invariant , but a gauge transformation @xmath531 ( for arbitrary @xmath21 ) adds only constant boundary points terms to @xmath3 , so that @xmath532 is unchanged . the hp is thus gauge invariant . if we introduce a parameter @xmath533 along the four - dimensional path ( proper time @xmath534 along the true or any particular virtual path are valid choices ) the action @xmath3 can be rewritten in the form @xmath535^{1/2 } { d\tau } + e \int\ a_{\alpha}v^{\alpha}{d\tau } , \eqno(6.2)\ ] ] where @xmath536 . in general , @xmath533 is both frame - independent and path - independent . a path - independent parameter is here invaluable for variational purposes , since we then do not have to vary the parameter when we vary the path . after the variations have been performed , we can then choose @xmath537 , etc . the limits of the integrals are the invariants @xmath538 and @xmath539 . with respect to parameter @xmath533 we get the covariant lagrangian @xmath540^{1/2 } + e v_{\alpha}a^{\alpha } , \eqno(6.3)\ ] ] and corresponding conjugate momenta @xmath541^{1/2 } + ea^{\alpha } , \eqno(6.4)\ ] ] and hamiltonian @xmath542 thus in this particular covariant treatment the hamiltonian is trivial . the dynamics is hidden in a constraint . one can see that the four conjugate momenta are not independent variables but satisfy the constraint @xmath543 which is obvious from ( 6.4 ) . this constraint can be taken into account with the help of the lagrange multiplier method , i.e. with the help of an effective hamiltonian @xcite @xmath544 . \eqno(6.7)\ ] ] we easily find that the hamilton equations of motion with @xmath545 are equivalent to @xmath546 ( for @xmath547 , the true trajectory proper time ) and to the covariant lorentz equations of motion for a charged particle in an external field : @xmath548 @xmath549 i.e. the same equations as are found from the lagrangian ( 6.3 ) ( see , e.g. @xcite ) . on the other hand the hamilton equations with @xmath545 are equivalent to the mp or to the rmp with the same @xmath545 . thus one can use any of the four variational principles ( hp , rhp , gmp , rmp ) either with lagrangian ( 6.3 ) or with effective hamiltonian ( 6.7 ) for the derivation of the covariant equations of motion . it is to be noted that in the covariant formulation of relativistic mechanics , the hamiltonian ( a lorentz scalar ) is not equal to the energy ( the time component of a four - vector ) . thus @xmath25 in the maupertuis principle must be interpreted as @xmath550 where @xmath551 . by contrast , in the noncovariant formulation discussed below , the hamiltonian is equal to the energy @xmath552 . there are other , related , formal difficulties arising from ( 6.5 ) . this condition ( @xmath553 ) is due to the fact that the lagrangian @xmath6 in ( 6.3 ) is homogeneous and of first degree in @xmath554 ( i.e. essentially linear in velocities @xmath554 ) , so that @xmath555 and hence the difference @xmath556 ( the hamiltonian ) vanishes @xcite . since @xmath553 , the legendre transform relation ( 6.5 ) between @xmath6 and @xmath7 simplifies to @xmath557 and hence the legendre transform relation between @xmath4 and @xmath3 , i.e. @xmath558 ( where @xmath559 ) , simplifies to @xmath560 because @xmath561 , direct application of the gmp ( @xmath562 would be cumbersome , and direct application of the rmp ( @xmath563 would be impossible . all these difficulties can be traced to the well studied difficulty @xcite of applying an action principle with kinematic @xcite nonholonomic constraints , such as ( 6.6 ) for the momenta , or for the velocities @xmath564 for proper time @xmath534 , or @xmath565 for arbitrary parameter @xmath533 . one way out of the difficulties is to introduce the constraint with a lagrange multiplier for either the lagrangian or hamiltonian ( as is done above for @xmath545 ) . another way out is to exploit the nonuniqueness of the lagrangian . for example @xcite , the covariant lagrangian @xmath6 ( 6.3 ) is equivalent to the covariant lagrangian @xmath566 , where ( with @xmath533 as parameter ) @xmath567 where @xmath568 . it is easily verified that ( 6.12 ) generates the same euler - lagrange equations of motion as ( 6.3 ) . for @xmath537 ( the proper time of the path in question ) , ( 6.12 ) simplifies to @xmath569 which is often employed @xcite . the advantage of ( 6.12 ) and ( 6.13 ) is that they are nonhomogeneous in @xmath554 , and hence will generate a nontrivial corresponding hamiltonian @xmath570 . for ( 6.13 ) , for example , we find @xmath571 note that @xmath570 ( 6.14 ) and @xmath545 ( 6.7 ) ( for @xmath572 ) differ only by a constant . use of the covariant @xmath573 and @xmath570 in place of @xmath6 and @xmath7 removes the difficulties of using all four variational principles ( hp , rhp , gmp , rmp ) . for @xmath6 and @xmath7 , only the first two can be used . note again that @xmath25 is computed from @xmath570 as in ( 6.9 ) , with @xmath570 in place of @xmath545 . now we come to the question of the solution of specific physical problems . in this case explicit covariance usually is not of great importance and it is more useful to find an appropriate convenient frame . for any given frame we can choose @xmath574 ( the coordinate time ) and obtain the complete set of nontrivial quantities @xmath575 @xmath576 @xmath577 , \eqno(6.15)\ ] ] @xmath578 the expression for @xmath6 in ( 6.15 ) is derived from ( 6.3 ) or ( 6.12 ) by choosing @xmath574 , except that we have used the freedom to change the sign of @xmath6 to agree with the standard choice in the noncovariant case @xcite . again we have chosen @xmath17 and @xmath18 . note that the nonrelativistic form @xmath579 for the maupertius action is not valid here , and also note that the hamiltonian @xmath7 is equal to the energy @xmath580 , despite the fact that @xmath581 . as a result the complete set of four variational principles is available in any particular frame . it is matter of taste or practical convenience to use one principle or another . from a practical point of view there is no difference in the usage of variational principles in nonrelativistic mechanics and in relativistic mechanics in a given frame . as an example of the usage of the gmp for relativistic mechanics consider the motion of an electron in a uniform magnetic field @xmath582 . a corresponding vector potential in the coulomb gauge ( @xmath583 ) is @xmath584 , or @xmath585 @xcite . the solution of ( 6.8 ) in this case is well known - the electron moves with constant velocity along the direction of the field ( along the z - axis in our case ) and along a circular orbit in the @xmath586 plane with the cyclotron frequency @xmath587 where @xmath44 is the total energy of the particle including the kinetic energy of the motion in the z -direction . to calculate this frequency from the gmp we take as a trial trajectory @xmath588 where @xmath110 and @xmath349 are free parameters . after some simple algebra we get @xmath589 @xmath590 . \eqno(6.17)\ ] ] in this case it seems that an economical method is to use the gmp ( 2.2 ) . for this purpose one has to rewrite @xmath4 as a function of @xmath25 @xmath591 [ \omega \bar e - \frac{|e|}{2}b ] , \eqno(6.18)\ ] ] and to calculate the variation @xmath592 at fixed @xmath25 . the gmp ( 2.2 ) translates here to @xmath593 . one then easily finds the analytical solution @xmath594 the exact solution corresponds to the case when @xmath492 . for our trial trajectory , we happen to have @xmath492 and the approximate solution coincides with the exact one ( similar to the case of a harmonic oscillator ) . this simple example demonstrates how to use variational principles for relativistic systems . in section 2.1 we mentioned that the classical limit of the schrdinger quantum variational principle is the reciprocal maupertuis principle for periodic or other steady - state motions , i.e. @xmath595 where @xmath596 is the hamiltonian operator corresponding to the classical hamiltonian @xmath35 . here @xmath36 is the period for periodic motions , or @xmath597 for other steady - state motions ( quasiperiodic or chaotic ) . solution of the left - hand side yields @xcite the stationary state @xmath598 with the energy eigenvalue @xmath116 , i.e. @xmath599 the time - independent schrdinger equation . details of the proof of ( 7.1 ) ( which is straightforward only for integrable systems ) are given in @xcite . in ref.@xcite it is explained how schrdinger , in his first paper on wave mechanics in 1926 , in essence worked backwards , i.e. starting from the right hand side of ( 7.1 ) , he derived " the left hand side , and thereby discovered wave mechanics . in his second paper on wave mechanics in 1926 he retracted this argument because his version of the right hand side of ( 7.1 ) was not quite correct . in this second paper he presented an alternative argument as a basis for wave mechanics ( now in the standard textbooks ) based on the analogy between geometric and wave optics on the one hand , and particle and wave mechanics on the other . we consider now the generalization of ( 7.1 ) to nonstationary states @xmath600 , where the true dynamical states satisfy the time - dependent schrdinger equation @xmath601 where @xmath602 , and the initial state @xmath603 is given . for notational simplicity we consider a single particle in three dimensions , so that @xmath604 , and @xmath605 where @xmath606 and @xmath607 = @xmath608 . the arguments which follow are also valid for nonconservative systems , where @xmath609 . we shall consider here the quantum time - dependent variational principle due to frenkel and dirac @xcite for the wave function @xmath600 , but we note the existence of other quantum time - dependent variational principles , e.g. for the time - evolution operator and transition amplitudes @xcite , for the heisenberg operator version @xcite and for the matrix mechanics version @xcite of the hamilton principle , for the density matrix @xcite , for the mean value of an arbitrary observable @xcite , and for time - dependent density functional theory @xcite . ( for completeness , we note that there are also other @xcite quantum time - independent variational principles , in addition to that of schrdinger . ) the original frenkel - dirac variational principle is @xcite @xmath610 for arbitrary variations @xmath611 around the true dynamical state @xmath612 . since ( 7.5 ) is true for all possible variations @xmath613 , then @xmath614 for the true states , as in ( 7.3 ) . by adding ( 7.5 ) and its complex conjugate and using the hermiticity of @xmath596 we can transform ( 7.5 ) to @xcite @xmath615 integrating over an arbitrary but fixed time interval @xmath616 , and assuming @xmath617 is fixed , we find @xcite from ( 7.6 ) @xmath618 note that ( 7.7 ) is not in the traditional form for a variational principle @xmath619 , because of the right hand side . it is more like the unconstrained principles discussed earlier . some authors drop the right hand side without comment @xcite , but it is required if arbitrary variations @xmath613 in @xmath620 are allowed ; otherwise ( 7.7 ) will not generate the schrdinger equation ( 7.3 ) and its complex conjugate @xcite . it is possible to obtain a vanishing right - hand side by restricting the variations @xmath613 in various ways @xcite , e.g. requiring the trial wave functions @xmath600 to be normalized at all times . another way is to write the right hand side as @xmath621 , formally regard @xmath620 and its complex conjugate @xmath622 as independent ( see below ) , and assume @xmath623 ( as well as @xmath603 ) is fixed . however , we find it simplest to retain the general form ( 7.7 ) , with no constraints on @xmath600 except for the fixing of the initial condition @xmath603 . ( when dealing explicitly with bound states later , we assume boundary conditions on @xmath624 . ) by writing out the scalar products @xmath625 in ( 7.7 ) and using the hermiticity of @xmath626 , we can write ( 7.7 ) in field theory form @xmath627 where the lagrangian density @xmath628 is @xmath629 since @xmath620 is a complex function , whose real and imaginary parts can be varied independently , it is well known @xcite that @xmath620 and @xmath630 can be regarded as independent for variational purposes . these two variations in ( 7.8 ) with @xmath628 given by ( 7.9 ) will generate the schrdinger equation and its complex conjugate . following feynman @xcite , we change variables @xmath631 ( or @xmath632 ) in the lagrangian density @xmath633 , where @xmath634 is the amplitude and @xmath635 the phase of the wave function , via the madelung transformation @xcite : @xmath636 where @xmath637 is the probability density . in terms of @xmath395 and @xmath3 we have @xmath638 in terms of @xmath632 the boundary term in ( 7.8 ) is @xmath639 we now take the classical ( @xmath473 ) limit of ( 7.8 ) . using ( 7.11 ) and ( 7.12 ) we get @xmath640 = \int d{\bf r } \rho(t)\delta s(t ) \;\ ; . \eqno ( 7.13)\ ] ] we have assumed that in the limit @xmath473 , @xmath395 and @xmath3 approach well defined limits ( which we continue to denote by @xmath395 and @xmath3 ) . in particular we assume that @xmath641 does not contain an @xmath642 term @xcite . we vary @xmath395 and @xmath3 independently in ( 7.13 ) . varying @xmath395 , with @xmath3 fixed , gives @xmath643 = 0.\ ] ] since @xmath644 is arbitrary , the bracket [ ... ] must vanish , so that @xmath645 this is the classical hamilton - jacobi equation @xcite for the classical action @xmath646 along true paths . next we vary @xmath3 in ( 7.13 ) with @xmath395 fixed . we integrate the @xmath647 term by parts using @xmath648 where we drop a surface term by assuming @xmath649 for @xmath650 . this assumes the corresponding quantum state has finite norm . we integrate the @xmath651 term by parts using @xmath652 where we use @xmath653 which follows from the fixing of @xmath617 . using ( 7.15 ) and ( 7.16 ) in ( 7.13 ) thus gives @xmath654\delta s = 0.\ ] ] since this is true for arbitrary @xmath655 , we get @xmath656 this is the continuity equation , reflecting conservation of total probability , since @xcite @xmath657 is the momentum of the particle . note that if the right hand side of ( 7.13 ) were missing , we would not get the correct continuity equation . in contrast to what we have done here , feynman @xcite keeps the @xmath658 terms in ( 7.11 ) , and the variational principle then leads to quantum generalizations @xcite of the hamilton - jacobi ( 7.14 ) and continuity ( 7.17 ) equations . thus we see that the classical limit of the quantum time - dependent variational principle is the classical variational principle for the hamilton - jacobi and continuity equations . interestingly the classical limit of the quantum time - dependent variational principle leads to a classical variational principle for the hamilton action @xmath3 along the true trajectories , whereas the classical limit of the quantum time - independent variational principle in the form of the left side of ( 7.1 ) leads to a classical variational principle for the trajectories themselves ( rmp -the right side of ( 7.1 ) ) . an alternative form @xcite of the quantum time - independent variational principle , @xmath659 will generate in the classical limit a variational principle for the maupertuis ( or time - independent ) action @xmath660 along the true paths . in ( 7.18 ) @xmath44 is a constant lagrange multiplier introduced to remove the normalization constraint @xmath661 . the extremizing @xmath662 s which satisfy ( 7.18 ) obey @xmath663 so that @xmath44 is the energy eigenvalue corresponding to the eigenfunction @xmath620 . to derive the classical limit of ( 7.18 ) we proceed much as before . ( we assume @xmath596 is time - independent in this section . ) we first apply the madelung transformation to @xmath662 , i.e. @xmath664 where @xmath665 is the amplitude and @xmath666 the phase . following similar steps as above , we find ( 7.18 ) becomes in the classical ( @xmath473 ) limit @xmath667 = 0 \;\ ; , \eqno ( 7.21)\ ] ] where @xmath668 . varying @xmath669 in ( 7.21 ) with @xmath666 fixed gives @xmath670 the time - independent hamilton - jacobi equation @xcite for the maupertuis action @xmath671 along true paths . if we vary @xmath666 in ( 7.21 ) with fixed @xmath669 we get the continuity equation @xmath672 since @xcite @xmath673 is the momentum of the particle . in ref.@xcite , we show how the classical limit of ( 7.18 ) can be taken in a different way ( using standard 1d wkb wave functions ) and for a 1d periodic orbit leads to @xmath674 , i.e. the uhp for a periodic orbit of period @xmath36 . we note that , just as for the right hand side of ( 7.1 ) , the derivation of the classical limits ( 7.14 ) and ( 7.22 ) is somewhat formal for the chaotic motions of nonintegrable systems , since classical values of @xmath3 and @xmath4 may not exist as well defined functions for such systems . unlike the nonrelativistic limit ( @xmath675 ) , which is regular , the limit @xmath676 or @xmath677 is singular , which makes the classical limit subtle and interesting @xcite . we summarize the two groups of classical variational principles reviewed in this paper . first we have the maupertuis principles : @xmath678 the first of these is the unconstrained form ( ump ) , the second the general maupertuis principle ( gmp ) , and the third is the reciprocal maupertuis principle ( rmp ) . by legendre transformation of the principles in ( 8.1 ) we obtain the hamilton principles : @xmath679 the first is the unconstrained form ( uhp ) , the second the hamilton principle ( hp ) , and the third the reciprocal hamilton principle ( rhp ) . in all these principles , the end - positions of the trajectory @xmath23 and @xmath24 are held fixed , and the notation indicates what else is fixed and what is varied . we have given a number of examples showing how to use these principles to solve practical problems , focussing particularly on the three maupertuis principles . both classical and semiclassical applications have been given , and some comparisons are made with the results from quantum variational principle calculations . the classical limits of two quantum variational principles ( time - dependent and time - independent ) are given . in particular , the rmp is the classical limit of the schrdinger time - independent quantum variational principle . the rmp is thereby naturally adapted to semiclassical applications in the applications , the variational principles ( both classical and quantum ) are solved by the direct variational method , where one guesses a trial solution containing adjustable parameters , and adjusts the parameters to satisfy the variational principle . the euler - lagrange differential equation is not required in this method . when we choose a simple trial solution , the results can be found simply and analytically . using the direct variational method the rmp and ump have been used to estimate semiclassically the energy levels in several examples . the levels @xmath680 can be expressed in analytical form , and the accuracy is quite acceptable in most cases , even for nonintegrable systems which are usually treated by much more complicated semiclassical methods , e.g. the gutzwiller trace formula @xcite , or quantizing the birkhoff - gustavson normal form @xcite . it would be useful to have comparisons of the results from the maupertuis principle - based method with those from the latter two and other methods for a number of specific problems . the methods should be compared for accuracy of results and computational complexity . some limited comparisons of the maupertuis principle and normal form methods have been done for the @xmath681 oscillator of sec . 4.1 in refs . @xcite , and limited comparisons for this model of results from the maupertuis principle and the semiclassical adiabatic methods @xcite are presented in table 1 of sec . 4.1.1 , but much more extensive comparisons would be of interest . variational principles appeal to various individuals for differing reasons , both aesthetic @xcite and practical . we have stressed the utility for classical and semiclassical particle dynamics calculations in this review . engineers too make heavy use of variational principles in solving practical problems of classical continuum mechanics @xcite . on rare occasions variational principles have even led to new laws of physics @xcite . we gratefully acknowledge the natural sciences and engineering research council of canada for financial support of this work . we thank donald sprung for a careful reading of the manuscript , david garfinkle for helpful remarks on relativistic mechanics and stepan bulanov for help with tex . ... since @xmath682 is the variation of @xmath201 with @xmath186 kept constant , we could conveniently write it as @xmath683 , in accordance with a convention used in thermodynamics ... it is curious that in spite of the obvious need in partial differentiation for precise statement of what is being kept constant , such statement is not embodied in customary notation of pure mathematics , though it is provided in thermodynamics , ... " _ h.jeffreys and b.s.jeffreys + methods of mathematical physics + cambridge u.p.,1946 . _ variational problems ask for the function which makes stationary an integral involving the function and its derivatives . usually there is a constraint which is fixed . for example , we are to find a function @xmath684 , describing a closed planar curve , of fixed length @xmath6 , which maximizes the area @xmath349 enclosed by the curve @xmath684 . @xmath349 and @xmath6 are functionals of @xmath684 : @xmath685 , l = l[y(x)]$ ] . for our purpose here , we do not need the precise form of @xmath349 or @xmath6 . @xmath6 is the constraint and @xmath349 is the functional to be varied . we use the following notation to describe this variation @xmath686 where the constraint @xmath6 is indicated as a subscript on the bracket enclosing the variation @xmath687 of the functional @xmath349 . the variation @xmath687 is first - order in @xmath682 , and is called the first variation when higher - order variations are considered @xcite . the constraint @xmath6 is denoted explicitly in ( a1.1 ) because it is the most important , or the one we wish to focus on . there may be other constraints which are left implicit , e.g. that the planar curve pass through a given point ( @xmath688 ) . in this paper we always leave fixed end - position constraints on curves ( closed or open ) implicit . the solution of the problem ( a1.1 ) is the function @xmath684 , which satisfies a differential equation , the euler - lagrange equation . the reciprocal variational problem has the constraint @xmath6 and the varied functional @xmath349 interchanged . in other words , it is described by the equation @xmath689 the two equations , ( a1.1 ) and ( a1.2 ) , @xmath684 . the reciprocal variation is searching for the function @xmath684 which makes stationary ( here minimizes ) the length @xmath6 of a closed curve with fixed enclosed area @xmath349 . the common solution for both problems is a circle , as is clear intuitively . one way to prove reciprocity is to use a trick , due to lagrange , called the method of lagrange multipliers . the problem ( a1.1 ) is first restated in unconstrained form as @xmath690 where the variations of both @xmath349 and @xmath6 are unconstrained and @xmath301 is an undetermined multiplier . to obtain ( a1.2 ) from ( a1.3 ) , we simply specify that we now fix @xmath349 ( i.e. set @xmath691 ) and vary @xmath6 , i.e. @xmath692 . this proves the reciprocity theorem . reciprocity is clear intuitively in the isoperimetric problem ( a1.1 ) . an example of reciprocity from physics is the gibbs conditions for equilibrium in thermodynamics @xcite . the reciprocal conditions @xmath693 and @xmath694 are both conditions for thermal equilibrium , where @xmath3 is the entropy and @xmath695 the internal energy . these express the facts that the state of thermal equilibrium is that state which maximizes the entropy for fixed internal energy , and also is that state which minimizes the internal energy for fixed entropy . ( the unconstrained form @xcite is @xmath696 , where the lagrange multiplier is the temperature @xmath36 . here the implicit constraints in all cases are fixed system volume @xmath34 and mole numbers @xmath697 ) reciprocal vp s in mechanics have only recently been studied @xcite - see sec.2 . this is all we shall need from the calculus of variations ; for more details one should consult a text - book @xcite . in sec . 2.2 , for conservative systems , we discussed the equivalence of the hamilton principle ( hp ) @xmath698 with the general maupertuis principle ( gmp ) @xmath699 here we show directly the equivalence of the gmp ( a2.2 ) with the original maupertuis principle ( mp ) @xmath700 in all these principles the end - positions @xmath23 and @xmath24 are held fixed . since ( a2.1 ) , ( a2.2 ) and ( a2.3 ) all generate the same ( euler - lagrange ) equations of motion , it is clear they must be equivalent , and it is interesting to show directly the equivalence of ( a2.2 ) and ( a2.3 ) . we must show that relaxing the constraint of fixed @xmath44 in ( a2.3 ) to fixed @xmath25 in ( a2.2 ) does not generate spurious or unphysical solutions . the constraint of fixed @xmath701 in ( a2.3 ) applies along and between the trial trajectories . to relax this constraint , we use the method of lagrange multipliers @xcite . since @xmath702 , we have @xmath703 , and hence @xmath704 where @xmath301 is an arbitrary constant . the trajectories all start at @xmath316 at fixed point @xmath349 and end at @xmath445 ( which may vary with the trial trajectory ) at fixed point @xmath705 . we release the constraint of fixed @xmath44 in ( a2.3 ) and choose @xmath301 such that where @xmath710 , and where we recall that the end - time @xmath36 is not fixed in ( a2.3 ) . recalling the definition @xmath711 enables us to write ( a2.5 ) as @xmath712 where we have used the fact that @xmath713 the true trajectory . expanding ( a2.6 ) gives to see that @xmath717 in ( a2.8 ) , we apply ( a2.8 ) to the special case of two true trajectories , with actions @xmath4 and @xmath718 and energies @xmath44 and @xmath719 . for this case ( a2.8 ) reads @xmath720 . comparison of this with the standard relation @xcite @xmath721 gives @xmath722 . hence we have thus ( a2.2 ) follows from ( a2.3 ) . the converse , the derivation of ( a2.3 ) from ( a2.2 ) is easy ; we simply restrict the trial trajectories in ( a2.2 ) to those of fixed energy @xmath44 , since the equations of motion following from ( a2.2 ) imply energy conservation . hence ( a2.2 ) and ( a2.3 ) are equivalent . nesbet r k 2003 _ variational principles and methods in theoretical physics and chemistry _ ( new york : cambridge u.p . ) ; l.r . ram - mohan l r 2002 _ finite element and boundary element applications in quantum mechanics _ ( oxford : oxford u.p . ) ; drake g w f 1998 _ encyclopedia of applied physics _ ( new york : wiley - vch ) * 23 * 121 ; gerjuoy e , rau a r p and spruch l 1983 _ rev.mod.phys . _ * 55 * 725 ; epstein s t 1974 _ the variation method in quantum chemistry _ ( new york : academic ) . quantum vp s for scattering states are reviewed in adhikari s k 1998 _ variational principles for the numerical solution of scattering problems _ ( new york : wiley ) . classical vp s for scattering are discussed in ref . @xcite . for example , in yourgrau and mandelstam @xcite the notation is reversed . hamilton himself used the current notation , but , for the actions along true paths , termed @xmath3 and @xmath4 the principal and characteristic functions , respectively . there is a recent exception : papastavridis j g 2002 _ analytical mechanics _ ( new york : oxford u.p . ) , p. 1044 , where the general maupertuis principle is discussed . this book contains a masterly and historical account of the various variational principles . in this review we focus on global ( integral ) vp s . we do not discuss the various local ( differential ) vp s due to dalembert , gauss , hertz , gibbs , jourdain and others @xcite . jourdain s principle , and its connections to others , is reviewed by wang l - s and pao y - h 2003 _ am . j. phys _ * 71 * 72 yourgrau w and mandelstam s 1968 _ variational principles in dynamics and quantum theory _ 3rd edition ( london : pitman , philadelphia : w.b.saunders ) , reprinted , dover , new york , 1979 ; terral m 2002 _ the man who flattened the earth _ ( chicago : university of chicago press ) c.g.j.jacobi 1884 _ vorlesungen ber dynamik _ , zweite ausgabe , herausgegeben von a.clebsch ( braunschweig/ wiesbaden : f.vieweg ) , reprinted by chelsea 1969 , p 44 . the quotation in this text is more explicit than @xcite : it names the textbooks of poisson , lagrange and laplace as some of the best ! percival i c 1977 _ adv . phys . _ * 36 * 1 , and references therein van brunt b 2004 _ the calculus of variations _ ( new york : springer ) ch 10 karl g and novikov v a 1995 _ phys . * 51 * 5069 ; 1995 _ j. exp . phys . _ * 80 * 783 holonomic ( coordinate ) constraints are assumed to be taken into account by the choice of the @xmath20 . nonholonomic ( velocity ) constraints ( see note @xcite ) are assumed absent in the early sections but are considered briefly in sec.6 and app.ii . we also exclude quasi - coordinates ( or nonholonomic coordinates ) , e.g. for a rigid body , the three rotation angles around space - fixed @xmath724 axes . vp s using such variables are discussed by papastavridis @xcite , and by marsden j e and ratiu t s 1994 _ introduction to mechanics and symmetry _ ( new york : springer ) p 390 . a seminal paper is poincar h 1901 _ c.r.acad.sci . _ * 132 * 369 the condition @xmath725 is valid for normal systems , for which @xmath31 , the holonomic constraints ( if any ) are time - independent and the reference frame is inertial . if these conditions are satisfied @xmath32 is quadratic in the @xmath726 s . note that the single condition @xmath32 quadratic in the @xmath726 s is not sufficient to have @xmath725 since for some systems with time - dependent constraints @xmath32 is quadratic in the @xmath726 s : see , e.g. de castro a s 2000 _ eur . j. phys . _ * 21 * 23 ; ferrario c and passerini a 2002 _ eur . j. phys . _ * 22 * 11 . percival i c 1974 _ j. phys . _ a * 7 * 794 ; ibid 1979 * 12 * 157 ; see also klein a and li c - t 1979 _ j. math . phys . _ * 20 * 572 . percival later extended his vp for invariant tori to cantori : 1980 _ amer . _ * 55 * 302 . a cantorus is , roughly speaking , a torus - shaped surface with holes such that what remains forms a cantor set of points . a trajectory confined to a torus surface is quasiperiodic . a trajectory starting on a cantorus will slowly leak away " because of the holes , hence is not confined to the surface so that the quasiperiodicity is destroyed in the long run , and is thus weakly chaotic . see arnold et al @xcite , p.194 , for a precise definition . also see percival i c 1991 in _ chaos and quantum physics giannoni m - j , voros a and zinn - justin j 1991 ( amsterdam : north - holland ) p 11 goldstein et al , ref . @xcite , p 597 ; lanczos , ref . @xcite , p 402 ; oliver d 1994 _ the shaggy steed of physics _ ( new york : springer ) p 39 ; schwinger j , de raad l l jr . , milton k a and tsai w - y 1998 _ classical electrodynamics _ ( reading ma : perseus books ) p 90 the unconstrained hamilton principle ( 2.8 ) is closely related to what hamilton termed the law of varying action ( see landau and lifshitz @xcite , p.134 ) , and also to what some authors refer to as the weiss action principle : see sudarshan e c g and mukunda n 1974 _ classical dynamics _ ( new york : wiley ) , reprinted by krieger 1983 , p 16 . if end - position variations are allowed , as well as end - time variations , the uhp ( 2.8 ) generalizes to @xmath730 , where @xmath731 is the true value of @xmath49 at end - point @xmath705 , etc , and for conservative systems @xmath732 . ( this generalization can be derived from the general first variational theorem @xcite of variational calculus , which includes end - point variations - see appendix a of @xcite for a related discussion of the ump . ) what hamilton termed the law of varying action is the special case for the variation between two true trajectories , so that @xmath733 and @xmath734 are exact differentials . this particular analogy can be pushed further . just as there are numerous other thermodynamic potentials besides the helmholtz free energy @xmath735 and the gibbs free energy @xmath736 , ( where @xmath49 is the pressure and @xmath34 the volume ) , e.g. the internal energy @xmath737 , ( where @xmath36 is the temperature and @xmath3 the entropy ) , we can introduce in mechanics further actions via further legendre transformations . for example , define @xmath738 , where @xmath24 is the final end - point position and @xmath731 the true momentum at @xmath705 . if we relax the constraint of fixed @xmath24 , the uhp generalizes further to @xmath739 . in terms of @xmath740 this transforms to @xmath741 . in terms of @xmath740 , the usual fully constrained hp is @xmath742 , replacing @xmath743 . here , as always , the constraint on @xmath23 is still left implicit in both . further legendre ( using @xmath744 and/or @xmath4 ) and reciprocal transformations are obvious . in this review we focus on the four basic variational principles summarized at the end of sec.2.2 . szamosi g 1973 _ found . phys . _ * 3 * 241 ; peterson m a 1979 _ am . _ * 47 * 488 ; toffoli t in 1999 _ feynman and computation _ ed . hey a j g ( reading ma : perseus books ) p 349 ; bailyn m 1990 _ a survey of thermodynamics _ ( new york : aip press ) p 416 . in particular , authors interested in linking the principle of least action to the second law of thermodynamics include ( see bailyn ) boltzmann , clausius , helmholtz , ehrenfest @xcite and planck : see also , e.g. , planck m 1915 _ eight lectures on theoretical physics _ ( new york : columbia univ . press ) , reprinted by dover , 1998 , p 97 ; thomson j j 1888 _ applications of dynamics to physics and chemistry _ ( london : macmillan ) reprinted by dawson , 1968 ; fnyes i 1952 _ zeit . f. phys . _ * 132 * 140 , and de broglie l 1995 _ diverses questions de mcanique et de thermodynamique classiques et relativistes _ ( berlin : springer ) gutzwiller m c 1990 _ chaos in classical and quantum mechanics _ ( new york : springer ) ; child m s 1991 _ semiclassical mechanics with molecular applications_(oxford : oxford u.p . ) ; brack m and bhaduri r k 1997 _ semiclassical physics _ ( reading ma : addison - wesley ) euler first described the method of discretizing time in the action integral , treating the @xmath745 as discrete variables , and obtaining discretized ( finite difference ) versions of the euler - lagrange ( and newton ) equations , to be solved with the two end - positions and the duration fixed . this method has also been much used in recent years : see , e.g. , percival 1991 @xcite ; beck t l , doll j d and freeman d l 1989 _ j. chem . phys . _ * 90 * 3181 ; basille a g and gray c g 1992 j.comp.phys . * 101 * 80 ; marsden j e and west m 2001 _ acta numerica _ * 10 * 357 ; monforte j c 2002 _ geometric , control and numerical aspects of nonholonomic systems _ ( new york : springer ) p 143 ; elber r , crdenas a , ghosh a and stern h a 2003 _ adv . phys . _ * 126 * 93 . courant r ( bull . * 49 * , 1 ( 1943 ) ) was one of the first to suggest spacial discretization of variational functionals involving fields @xmath746 , a precursor to the modern finite element method ( ram - mohan , ref.@xcite ) which uses a basis of localized trial functions . unfortunately , in some good textbooks the authors misapply the original mp @xmath747 for 1d problems by employing trial trajectories which do not conserve the energy @xmath44 : see , e.g. , tabarrok and rimrott @xcite , p. 180 , or park d 1990 _ classical dynamics and its quantum analogues _ 2nd ed.(new york : springer ) p 80 . olsson m g 1978 _ am . _ * 46 * 1118 ; ibid 1981 * 49 * 531 ; synge j l and griffiths b a 1959 _ principles of mechanics _ ( new york : mcgraw hill ) p 335 ; routh e j 1898 _ a treatise on the dynamics of a particle _ ( cambridge : cambridge u.p . ) , reprinted by dover 1960 p 349 ; airy g b 1851 _ phil.mag . _ series 4 * 2 * 141 . in the second edition of _ mcanique analytique _ ( 1815 ) , lagrange gave an incorrect result for eq ( 3.11 ) . for an english translation of the second edition see lagrange j l 1997 _ analytical mechanics _ , eds . boissonnade a and vagliente v n ( dordrecht : kluwer ) p 462 . the error was corrected by bertrand , the editor of the third edition ( 1855 ) , following a communiqu by bravais . the rmp method yields @xmath748 and hence after semiclassical quantization @xmath749 , the same as ( 4.7 ) found by the fully quantum vp . since @xmath750 is therefore rational , the optimum quantized trajectories are periodic , at least at this level of approximation . periodic trajectories also play a key role in gutzwiller s trace formula method of semiclassical quantization @xcite . rajan m and junkins j l 1983 _ int . j. nonlinear mech . _ * 18 * 335 bukta d , karl g and nickel b g 2000 _ can . j. phys . _ * 78 * 449 szeredi t and goodings d a 1992 _ phys . rev . lett . _ * 69 * 1640 ; ibid . 1993 rev._e * 48 * 3529 burnell f , mann r b and ohta t 2003 _ phys . lett . _ * 90 * 134101 pauli w 1973 _ pauli lectures in physics _ vol.5 ( cambridge : mit press ) shinohara h 2000 _ rep . phys . _ * 63 * 843 ; eletskii a v 2000 _ uspekhi _ * 43 * , 111 dresselhaus m s , dresselhaus g and eklund p s 1996 _ science of fullerenes and carbon nanotubes _ ( san diego : academic press ) cioslowski j 1995 _ electronic structure calculations on fullerenes and their derivatives _ ( new york : oxford u.p . ) joslin c g , gray c g , poll j d , goldman s and buckingham a d 1995 _ collision and interaction - induced spectroscopy _ eds tabisz g c and neuman m n nato asi ser . c * 452 * ( dordrecht : kluwer ) p 261 joslin c g , yang j , gray c g , poll j d and goldman s 1995 _ lectures on thermodynamics and statistical mechanics _ eds castas m , rodriguez r and benavides a l ( singapore : world scientific ) p 146 complexes xc@xmath751 , where x is on the of the cage , have also been studied , e.g. h@xmath752c@xmath753 @xcite and h@xmath752c@xmath754 ( nanotubes ) @xcite . complexes such as k@xmath755 c@xmath753 are superconductors in the solid state @xcite . joslin c g , gray c g , goddard j d , goldman s , yang j and poll j d 1993 _ chem . lett . _ * 213 * 377 ; joslin c g , yang j , gray c g , goldman s , and poll j d 1993 _ chem . lett . _ * 208 * 86 ; joslin c g , yang j , gray c g , goldman s , and poll j d 1993 _ chem . lett . _ * 211 * 587 ; joslin c g , gray c g , goldman s , yang j and poll j d 1993 _ chem . lett . _ * 215 * 44 joslin c g , gray c g and goldman s 1995 _ chem . phys.lett._ * 244 * 93 ; ibid 1996 * 251 * 414 ( e ) lee - dadswell g r and gray c g 1995 _ can . j. phys . _ * 78 * 599 lee - dadswell g r and gray c g 2003 _ can . _ submitted mandziuk m and bacic z 1994 _ j. chem . _ * 101 * 2126 joslin c g , gray c g and goldman s 1994 _ chem . phys.lett._ * 227 * 405 for li@xmath756@c@xmath753 and lih@c@xmath753 , anisotropic perturbations of the isotropic potential , and the consequent chaotic motions , have been studied by hernndez - rojas et al . yakobson b i and smalley r e 1997 _ american scientist _ * 85 * 324 bug a l r , wilson a and voth g a 1992 _ j. phys . chem . _ * 96 * 7864 ; cardini g , procacci p , salvi p r and schettino v 1992 _ chem . lett . _ * 200 * 39 ; li y s and tomnek d 1994 _ chem . lett . _ * 221 * , 453 the potential @xmath757 can be fit @xcite to simple analytic forms(polynomial , morse , etc ) . in some cases ( e.g. li@xmath756@c@xmath753 ) the potential has its minimum off - centre . for k@xmath756@c@xmath753 the potential is essentially @xmath758 , a rare example of a pure quartic oscillator in nature . lee - dadswell g r 1999 _ m.sc.thesis _ university of guelph , p 58 leubner c and p. krumm p 1990_eur . j. phys . _ * 11 * 31 ; anderson n and arthurs a m 1997 _ eur . j. phys . _ * 18 * 404 ; kobe et al . @xcite ; del valle g , campos i and jimnez j l 1996 _ eur . _ * 17 * 253 bateman h 1931 _ phys . rev . _ * 38 * 815 ; havas p 1957 _ nuovo cimento suppl . _ * 5 * 363 ; leitmann g 1963 _ j.appl.mech . _ * 30 * 623 ; denman h h 1966 _ am . j. phys . _ * 34 * 1147 ; ray j r 1974 _ am . _ * 47 * 626 ; greenberger d m 1979 it j. math * 20 * 762 ; kobussen j 1979 _ acta phys . aust . _ * 51 * 293 ; bahar l y and kwatny h g 1981 _ am . j. phys . _ * 49 * 1062 ; dekker h 1981 _ phys.rep . _ * 80 * , 1 ; lemos n a 1981 _ am . j. phys . _ * 49 * 1181 ; kobe d h , reali g and sieniutycz s 1986 _ am . j. phys . _ * 54 * 997 ; huang y - s and lin c - l 2002 _ am . _ * 70 * 741 ; vujanovic b d and jones s e 1989 _ variational methods in nonconservative systems _ ( boston : academic press ) ; edelen d g b 1977 _ lagrangian mechanics of nonconservative nonholonomic systems _ ( leyden : noordhoff ) ; soper d e 1976 _ classical field theory _ ( new york : wiley ) p 126 ; santilli r m 1978 _ foundations of theoretical mechanics _ vol . 1 ( new york : springer ) pp . 183 , 199 , 206 ; logan j d 1977 _ invariant variational principles _ ( new york : academic press ) p 56 . these workers go beyond the rayleigh dissipation function method @xcite , and incorporate the friction into the lagrangian ( or hamiltonian ) . for example , for a harmonic oscillator with linear damping ( equation of motion @xmath759 ) , one easily verifies that a suitable lagrangian is @xmath760 $ ] , and the corresponding hamiltonian is @xmath761 . buch l h and denman h h 1976 _ phys . lett . a _ * 55 * 325 . see also yourgrau and mandelstam @xcite , p.47 , who note essentially ( 5.3 ) without remarking explicitly that it is valid for nonconservative systems . similarly see landau and lifshitz @xcite , p.139 , routh @xcite , p.301 , and boltzmann @xcite , p. 121 , where the nonconservative aspect is more explicit . the form @xmath762 for the ump , which is easily shown to be equivalent to ( 5.4 ) , essentially appears in passing in the equations of yourgrau and mandelstam @xcite , p.46 , but they do not note explicitly its validity for nonconservative systems . for the special case of periodic systems evolving adiabatically with parameter @xmath295 , ehrenfest @xcite gives a relation related to ( 5.4 ) ; he has @xmath763 rather than @xmath764 ( as in the original mp ) , and our @xmath765 is replaced by a @xmath766 term . ehrenfest attributes his result to boltzmann and clausius . as before , in the ump ( 5.4 ) we have fixed the initial time @xmath17 and allow the final time @xmath767 to vary . if both @xmath768 and @xmath769 are allowed to vary , ( 5.4 ) generalizes to @xmath770 \delta t_b + [ e(t_a)- \bar e ] \delta t_a = 0 $ ] . this reduces to ( 5.4 ) for fixed @xmath768 , and to ( 2.10 ) for conservative systems ( @xmath771 ) . further generalizations , allowing @xmath24 and/or @xmath23 to vary , are discussed in notes @xcite if we start the cycle at the moving wall , for example , instead of the fixed one , the action @xmath772 is not an exact invariant . see crawford f s 1990 _ am.j.phys _ * 58 * 337 ; gignout c and brut f 1989 _ am.j.phys . _ * 57 * , 422 ; percival i and richards d 1982 _ introduction to dynamics _ ( cambridge : cambridge u.p . ) p 142 ; lochak and meunier @xcite , p.18 ; brack and bhaduri @xcite , p. 10 . lichtenberg a j and lieberman m a 1992 _ regular and chaotic dynamics _ 2 ed ( new york : springer ) p 57 and 216 . krainov v p 2002 _ selected mathematical methods in theoretical physics _ ( london : taylor and francis ) p 143 . hannay j h 1985 _ j.phys.a _ * 18 * 221 ; berry m v 1985 _ j.phys.a _ * 18 * 15 . these papers and others on the berry phase are reprinted in shapere a and wilczek f eds 1989 _ geometric phases in physics _ ( singapore : world scientific ) shapere a and wilczek f , ref . [ 30 ] , p 3 ; marsden j e and ratiu t s , ref . @xcite , p 44 ; khein a and nelson d 1992 _ am . j. phys . _ * 61 * 170 ; kugler m 1989 _ am . j. phys . _ * 57 * 247 ; montgomery r 1988 _ comun . phys . _ * 120 * 269 ; greenberger d m 1979 _ j. math . phys . _ * 20 * 762 ; koiller j 1989 _ contemp . _ * 97 * 159 grimsehl e 1932 _ a textbook of physics _ vol . 1 ( london : blackie and son ) p 165 ; sommerville w b 1972 _ quart ; hart j b , miller r e and mills r l 1987 _ am . j. phys . _ * 55 * 67 the converse can be made plausible : from an assumed adiabatic invariance of the long path @xmath4 , the adiabatic invariance of @xmath140 follows . we use @xcite , for @xmath433 , @xmath773 , where @xmath774 is the projected area of curve @xmath357 on the @xmath775 plane , and the fact that the dynamical invariance ( poincar invariant ) of @xmath776 can be derived @xcite from the dynamical invariance of @xmath777 the adiabatic invariance of long - path @xmath4 s for ergodic systems follows heuristically from the ump ( 5.4 ) as described in the text . alternatively , we can heuristically argue that for @xmath597 , the long path is essentially closed in phase space , so that the poincar dynamical invariant @xmath778 remains essentially adiabatically constant as the energy surface and the path on it slowly evolve . obviously the limiting procedures are delicate and problematic . even if our conjecture is true , the adiabatic invariance may appear to be of the seemingly uninformative type @xmath779 , since @xmath780 for @xmath433 . to extract finite results , @xmath36 will need to be taken as , say , the poincar cycle time . we note that , in another situation where @xmath780 as @xmath433 , i.e. scattering orbits , useful results can still be extracted @xcite . the arguments in the above paragraph , as well as the one in the text , apply also more generally to the chaotic motions of nonergodic nonintegrable systems . since adiabatic invariants have not been found previously for such systems , it would be of interest to prove , or disprove , these suggestions . if proven , it would then be of interest to establish a general semiclassical quantization scheme for nonintegrable systems based on @xmath4 ( generalizing ( 5.32 ) which holds for ergodic systems ) . hertz p 1910 _ ann.der phys . _ * 33 * 225 , 537 . hertz s proof of the adiabatic invariance of the phase volume @xmath434 made explicit what was implicit in the statistical mechanical works of boltzmann , gibbs , and others . ( recall the boltzmann relation for the entropy @xmath781log@xmath434 ; reversible adiabatic processes ( @xmath782 ) correspond to constant @xmath434 . ) hertz s argument is available in a few textbooks : kahan t 1960 _ physique thoretique _ tome premier , vol . ii , ( paris : presses universitaires ) p 482 ; becker r 1969 _ theory of heat _ ( new york : springer ) p 131 ; mnster a 1969 _ statistical thermodynamics _ , vol.i ( berlin : springer ) p 52 ; toda m , kubo r and saito n 1983 _ statistical physics i _ ( berlin : springer ) p 48 . for a rigorous proof , see kasuga t 1961_proc . japan acad . _ * 37 * 366 , 372 , 377 : see also lochak p and c.meunier c 1988 _ multiphase averaging for classical systems _ ( new york : springer ) p 239 . reinhardt w p 1994 _ prog . _ * 116 * 179 , and references therein skodje r t and cary j r 1988 _ computer phys . _ * 8 * 221 berry m v , in 1985 _ theoretical and applied mechanics _ eds . f.i.niordson and n.olhoff ( amsterdam : elsevier ) p 83 , and references therein brown r , ott e and grebogi c 1987 _ phys . lett . _ * 59 * 1173 ehrenfest p 1917 _ phil.mag . _ * 33 * 500 . reprinted in _ sources of quantum mechanics _ ed . van der waerden b l 1967 ( amsterdam : north holland ) , reprinted by dover 1968 , p 79 . an extended version of this paper is available in _ paul ehrenfest collected scientific papers _ , klein m j 1959 ( amsterdam : north holland ) p 378 . later ehrenfest s student j.m.burgers showed that the one - cycle ( or torus ) actions @xmath783 are adiabatic invariants for multidimensional quasiperiodic systems ( burgers j m 1918 _ proc.amsterdam acad . _ * 20 * 163 ; for a textbook treatment , see landau and lifshitz @xcite , p 161 . ) the subtle conditions ( concerning the nondegeneracy of the system frequencies @xmath784 during the adiabatic evolution ) required for the @xmath783 to be adiabatic invariants are discussed by dirac p a m 1925 _ proc . soc . _ * 107 * 725 and von laue m 1925 _ ann . der phys . _ * 76 * 619 the cumulative number of states up to @xmath44 , @xmath785 , is defined quantum mechanically by @xmath786 , where @xmath596 is the hamiltonian operator and tr denotes a trace . tomsovic s 1991 _ j.phys . _ a * 24 * 733 mcrae s m and vrscay e r 1992 _ j. math . phys . _ * 33 * 3004 ; mckinley w a 1971 _ am . j. phys . _ * 39 * 405 ; weisskopf v 1934 _ zeit.f.phys . _ * 89 * 27 . for periodic systems ehrenfest @xcite showed that the classical hellmann - feynman theorem is equivalent to the adiabatic invariance of the action @xmath4 . ehrenfest ( who was boltzmann s student ) attributes this result to boltzmann and clausius . the classical theorem can also be derived ( epstein @xcite ) from classical perturbation theory , using the result ( ter haar @xcite , p.156 ) that the first - order energy shift @xmath787 due to a small change in the hamiltonian @xmath477 by the amount @xmath788 is @xmath789 . our derivation , and that of epstein @xcite , allow @xmath301 to occur anywhere in the hamiltonian . other explicit published derivations assume @xmath301 occurs in the potential . implicit derivations are contained in a number of places : van vleck j h 1926 _ quantum principles and line spectra , bull . nat.res . council _ , 10 part 4 , p 205 ; becker @xcite , p 129 ; mnster @xcite , p51 ; landau and lifshitz @xcite , p 155 . the classical and quantum hellmann - feynman relations can be generalized to relations ; for systems in thermal equilibrium we find @xmath790 , where @xmath735 is the helmholtz free energy and @xmath791 denotes a ( classical or quantum ) canonical ensemble average . see gubbins k e and gray c g 1984 _ theory of molecular fluids _ ( oxford : oxford u.p . ) p 236 , and references therein . thus in statistical mechanics we do have @xmath792 in the ensemble ; the correct relation is @xmath793 $ ] , where @xmath794 , with @xmath795 boltzmann s constant and @xmath36 the temperature . ( in the ensemble , where @xmath796 because of the absence of energy fluctuations , we do find @xmath797 , both classically and quantum mechanically . ) hellmann h 1937 _ einfhrung in die quantenchemie _ ( vienna : denticke ) ; feynman r p 1939 _ phys . rev . _ * 56 * 340 ; see also van vleck j h 1928 _ phys . rev . _ * 31 * 587 , and pauli w 1933 _ handbuch der physik _ * 24 * , part 1 , eds . geiger h and scheel k ( berlin : springer ) , translated edition 1980 _ general principles of quantum mechanics _ ( berlin : springer ) p 86 . for a review of other derivations , applications and extensions , see epstein s t 1981 , in _ the force concept in chemistry _ ( new york : van nostrand reinhold ) ed . deb b m , p 1 . the condition @xmath553 also occurs nonrelativistically if a parameter @xmath533 is used in place of @xmath16 ; see , e.g. , goldstein et al @xcite , p.320 , or lanczos @xcite , p. 186 . doughty n a 1990 _ lagrangian interaction _ ( reading ma : addison - wesley ) p 416 ; leubner c 1986 _ eur . j. phys . _ * 7 * 17 ; johns o d 1985 _ am . _ * 53 * 982 dirac p a m 1964 _ lectures on quantum mechanics _ ( new york : yeshiva university and academic press ) p 9 ; arnold v i , kozlov v v and neishtadt a i 1988 in _ dynamical systems iii _ ed . arnold v i ( berlin : springer ) p 39 nonholonomic constraints @xmath798 contain the velocities @xmath799 , such that the constraints can not be integrated up to global coordinate constraints @xmath800 . nonholonomic constraints arise from introducing redundant variables as in sec.6 on relativistic mechanics , or by introducing constants of the motion as constraints @xcite as in app.ii for the mp , or by imposing the kinematic constraint between @xmath33 and the velocity or the momentum after first having released the constraint @xcite . nonholonomic constraints arise from physical forces of constraint , such as arise in rolling motion @xcite . kinematic nonholonomic constraints can be handled by an effective lagrangian @xmath801 , where @xmath802 are lagrange multipliers @xcite . dynamic nonholonomic constraints can not be handled by such an effective lagrangian ( contrary to what is stated in some excellent textbooks ) and construction of an hp or mp is highly problematic @xcite . papastavridis @xcite gives a clear discusion and references to the historical literature ; tabarrok b and rimrott f p j 1994 _ variational methods and complementary formulation in dynamics _ ( dordrecht : kluwer ) p 142 ; rund h 1966 _ the hamilton - jacobi theory in calculus of variations _ ( new york : van nostrund reinhold ) , reprinted by krieger 1973 , p 352 ; pars l a 1965 _ a treatise on analytic dynamics _ ( cambridge : cambridge u.p . ) , reprinted by ox bow press , 1979 , p 528 ; rumiantsev v v 1978 _ j. appl . math . and mech . _ * 42 * , 407 ; ibid . 1979 * 43 * 625 ; whittaker @xcite , p 249 ; saletan e j and cromer a h 1970 _ am . j. phys . _ * 38 * 892 another common choice is @xmath803 . this choice is known as the landau gauge ( in this gauge * a * is invariant under translations along the y axis ) . the first choice is known as the symmetric gauge ( because of the rotational invariance of * a * about the z axis ) . gibbs j w 1906 _ the scientific papers of j. willard gibbs , vol.1 , thermodynamics _ ( london : longmans , green ) , reprinted by dover , 1961 , p 56 . for modern treatments , see callen h b 1985 _ thermodynamics _ 2nd edition ( new york : wiley ) p 133 , and bailyn @xcite , p 224 . there are various ways to constrain the variation so that @xmath598 is selected . in principle , one can minimize the energy @xmath804 with the trial @xmath620 s restricted to be orthogonal to the exact @xmath805 . in practice , since @xmath805 are rarely known exactly , one can find an approximate @xmath598 by choosing trial @xmath620 s with @xmath43 nodes ( for 1d problems ) . alternatively , one can choose a trial @xmath620 which is known to be the @xmath43th eigenstate of a similar hamiltonian ( see sec . 3.1 for an example ) . frenkel j 1934 _ wave mechanics , advanced general theory _ ( oxford : oxford u.p . ) frenkel states that he took his argument from the appendix to the russian edition of dirac p a m 1930 _ the principles of quantum mechanics _ ( oxford : oxford u.p . ) , but we are unable to locate the argument in this reference . see also heisenberg w 1930 _ the physical principles of the quantum theory _ ( chicago : university of chicago press ) , reprinted by dover , 1960 , p 163 a minimum residual principle @xmath806 is similar to that of frenkel and dirac , and was proposed by mclachlan a d and bell m a 1964 _ rev . phys . _ * 36 * 844 . for recent applications of the frenkel - dirac variational principle to molecular and condensed matter problems , see e.g. refs @xcite and also beck m h , jackle a , worth g a and meyer h - d 2000 _ phys . rep . _ * 324 * 1 ; wang h 2000 _ j. chem . phys . _ * 113 * 9948 . schwinger j 1951 _ phys . rev . _ * 82 * 914 . the generalized operator uhp is @xmath807 ( allowing both final end parameters @xmath808 to vary , and fixing the initial ones @xmath809 ) , where @xmath810 is a heisenberg time - dependent operator , @xmath811 the action operator , and @xmath812 the lagrangian operator . if @xmath813 we get the operator uhp , @xmath814 , and if the end parameter variations both vanish , we get the operator hp , @xmath815 . from the generalized operator uhp schwinger derives what is nowadays known as the schwinger action principle for the variation of the propagator @xmath816 , where @xmath817 is the evolution operator , i.e. @xmath818 . here an arbitrary number of intermediate state parameters @xmath819 are allowed to vary on the left hand side , e.g. @xmath820 in @xmath821 , as well as the final end - state parameters @xmath822 . ( schwinger also discusses other possible variations ) . if there are no end - state parameter variations , then @xmath823 and hence @xmath824 . the analogy of the last relation with the classical hp is clearer when we write the classical hp as @xmath825 . schwinger s original paper discusses the case of relativistic quantum field theory . for a nonrelativistic quantum mechanics discussion , with examples , see schwinger s posthumously published lecture notes , schwinger j 2001 _ quantum mechanics _ ed englert b - g ( berlin : springer ) p 207 . for the connection to feynman s path integral expression for the propagator , see yourgrau and mandelstam , ref . @xcite , p 139 . for vp s for diagonal and off - diagonal matrix elements of arbitrary operators , and for vp s for wave - functions , see gerjuoy et al @xcite and references therein . for a ground state energy vp based on path integrals , see feynman r p and hibbs a r 1965 _ quantum mechanics and path integrals _ ( new york : mcgraw - hill ) p 303 . for a vp for the ground state energy as a functional of the particle density ( density functional theory ) , see hohenberg p and kohn w 1964 _ phys . rev . _ * 136*b 864 . lwdin p o and mukherjee p k 1972 _ chem . * 14 * 1 ; kramer p and saraceno m 1981 _ geometry of the time - dependent variational principle in quantum mechanics _ ( new york : springer ) ; deumens e , diz a , longo r and hrn y 1994 _ rev . phys . _ * 66 * 917 these are often referred to as the de broglie - bohm or quantum hydrodynamic equations : see , e.g. , holland @xcite , p 15 and p 69 ; wyatt r e 2002 _ j. chem . phys _ * 117 * 956 ; kendrick b k 2003 _ j. chem . phys _ * 119 * 5805 , and references therein . the quantum continuity equation retains the same form ( 7.17 ) , and the quantum hamilton - jacobi equation takes the form ( 7.14 ) with an additional so - called quantum potential term @xmath826 added to @xmath34 . these equations can also be ( and are usually ) derived by substituting the madelung form ( 7.10 ) into the schrdinger equation ( 7.3 ) and using ( 7.4 ) . in practice ( 7.18 ) is less useful for bound states than ( 7.1 ) since @xmath44 and @xmath620 are both unknown for bound states . for scattering states @xmath44 is known , and @xmath827 causes no problem in ( 7.18 ) , as it does in ( 7.1 ) . in the present context , the normal form is a perturbation series , often generated by poisson bracket and lie transform methods , which expresses the system energy @xmath44 as a power series in the good actions @xmath783 , @xmath828 semiclassical quantization is achieved by the ebk substitution @xmath829 . in molecular physics the quantized version of the normal form is usually referred to as the dunham expansion : see , e.g. , toda m 2002 _ adv . phys . _ * 123 * 153 ; herman m , lievin j , auwera j v and campargue a 1999 , _ adv . phys . _ * 108 * , 1 reddy j n 2002 _ energy principles and variational methods in applied mechanics _ ( new york : wiley ) the derivation of the einstein gravitational field equations from the einstein - hilbert action is the classic example : see , e.g. , landau and lifshitz @xcite , p 307 routh uses this method to , in effect , transform the original mp ( a2.3 ) into the unconstrained hamilton principle ( 2.8 ) , and from this he obtains the euler - lagrange equations of motions . pars uses a similar method to derive euler - lagrange equations from the original mp ; he however , allows @xmath301 to be a variable @xmath295 , and later finds it to be a constant after all . see routh e j 1905 _ advanced dynamics of a system of rigid bodies _ 6 ed ( london : macmillan ) , reprinted by dover , 1955 , p.306 , and pars @xcite , p 249 . Abstract:

Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.

Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered . Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video . Paper: mri plays a key role in the diagnosis and management of acute ischemic stroke and traumatic brain injury . a rigorous understanding of mri begins with the elementary particles which give rise to the magnetic properties of tissue . elementary particles have two independent properties which manifest magnetic moments : ( i ) orbital angular momentum , and ( ii ) intrinsic spin . these two properties are independent only to first order , as it was their very interaction via spin - orbit coupling which led to detectable energy differences in the hydrogen spectrum , and consequently to the discovery of intrinsic spin . we discuss both properties in this paper in the context of the hydrogen atom . the hydrogen atom @xmath0h is the most frequently targeted nucleus in mri due largely to its biological abundance and high gyromagnetic ratio . the @xmath0h nucleus consists of a single proton . protons are made of quarks , specifically one down and two up quarks , each of which are of spin 1/2 . the charge and spin of the proton are both directly due to its quark composition . the down quark has a charge of -1/3 while the up quarks each have charge + 2/3 , which all sums up to a charge of + 1 . the nuclear spin is 1/2 by virtue of spin cancellation from the antiparallel alignment of two of the three quarks . the remainder of this paper is organized as follows : section ( [ sec : mri ] ) presents an overview of the mri , section ( [ sec : stroke ] ) reviews the mri assessment of acute ischemic stroke , section ( [ sec : h_atom ] ) describes the hydrogen atom and reviews an analytical solution to its schrdinger equation , section ( [ sec : spin ] ) reviews intrinsic spin , section ( [ sec : adding ] ) reviews quantum mechanical addition of orbital angular momentum and spin , section ( [ sec : groups ] ) reviews group theory of su(2 ) and so(3 ) and their relationship , and section ( [ sec : summary ] ) summarizes this review . the mri section , section ( [ sec : mri ] ) , contains a number of subsections which are outlined as follows : subsection ( [ subsec : scales ] ) discusses the hierarchy of scales in mri phenomenology , subsection ( [ subsec : magnetism_e_n ] ) reviews the magnetism of electrons and nucleons , subsection ( [ subsec : mag_potential ] ) reviews the magnetic potential energy and its role in the descriptions of magnetization , torque , force , and larmor precession , subsection ( [ subsec : pulse_mag ] ) reviews pulse magnetization , subsection ( [ subsec : equilibrium_mag ] ) describes equilibrium magnetization , subsection ( [ subsec : t1 ] ) describes spin - lattice or t@xmath1 recovery , subsection ( [ subsec : t2 ] ) describes spin - spin or t@xmath2 decay , subsection ( [ subsec : fid ] ) reviews free inductance decay , subsection ( [ subsec : bloch ] ) reviews the bloch equations , subsection ( [ subsec : contrast ] ) overviews intravenous contrast agents in mri , subsection ( [ subsec : gradient ] ) reviews gradient - based band - selection method for mri space localization , and subsection ( [ subsec : machine ] ) reviews the components of the mri machine . the stroke section , section ( [ sec : stroke ] ) , contains a number of subsections which are outlined as follows : subsection ( [ subsec : dwi ] ) reviews diffusion weighted imaging ( dwi ) , subsection ( [ subsec : pwi ] ) reviews perfusion weighted imaging ( pwi ) , subsection ( [ subsec : dwi_pwi ] ) reviews the combination of dwi and pwi and its utility in imaging the penumbra , subsection ( [ subsec : mrs ] ) reviews magnetic resonance spectroscopy , subsection ( [ subsec : bold ] ) reviews blood oxygen level dependent ( bold ) imaging , and subsection ( [ subsec : mra ] ) reviews mra . appnedix ( a ) reviews the signals processing involved in mri , including the fourier transforms , the canonical sampling theorem , and the convolution theorem . the mri is an optical technology whose core equation is the maxwell - faraday equation . it exploits ensemble phenomena in which the composition of a sample can be probed by sensing its magnetic properties through radio frequency waves . here , we describe the various parts of mri and their respective roles in the whole . the hierarchy of scales in the modeling of magnetic resonance imaging proceeds from the subnuclear scale of quarks and gluons , to the subatomic scale of discrete electrons and nucleons , and finally to the bulk sample scale where ensemble effects and statistical mechanics are the operative physics . in a general sense , the subnuclear scale is coupled to quantum field theory , the subatomic scale is coupled to quantum mechanics , and the bulk sample scale is coupled to classical electromagnetics . certain phenomena in mri are only meaningful over specific regimes . for instance , a magnetic moment experiences a torque when an external magnetic field is applied . however , the concept of torque is a classical concept . it is deterministic and continuous , and is meaningful only at the level of ensemble or bulk effect . on the microscopic level , such as on the scale of single electrons and nucleons , quantum mechanics is the operative physics , and state transitions are quantized . this is encoded in the time evolution of quantum states governed by an appropriate hamiltonian , yielding the specific schrdinger equation that applies in that setting . although pedagogically separable , the scales are intrinsically linked physically . for instance , the bulk magnetization , @xmath3 , is the net sum of the atomic level magnetic moments , @xmath4 . similarly the pulse magnetization frequency used to torque the bulk magnetization vector and change its direction is a radio frequency wave , @xmath5 , oscillating at the larmor frequency of the individual nucleons . furthermore , @xmath5 takes its effect by acting directly on the individual electrons and nucleons , causing them to precess in phase . electrons , protons , and neutrons are magnets . they derive their magnetism from intrinsic spin and orbital angular momentum . in the presence of an externally applied magnetic field , this results in bulk magnetism of sample tissue . the magnetic dipole moment , @xmath6 , of a single unpaired electron or nucleon is given by , @xmath7 where @xmath8 is the gyromagnetic ratio measured in hz / t ( hertz per tesla ) and @xmath9 is the spin . the gyromagnetic ratio for the electron is given by , @xmath10 where @xmath11 is the elementary charge , @xmath12 is the mass of the electron , and @xmath13 is the electron gyromagnetic factor ( g - factor ) , a dimensionless number whose experimental agreement with theory is near unprecedented on this scale , and thereby lends strong credibility to the theory of quantum electrodynamics . table ( [ tab : consts ] ) shows the electron and proton g - factors . the gyromagnetic ratio for nucleons is given by , @xmath14 where @xmath15 is the mass of the proton , and @xmath16 is the g - factor of the nucleon . estimated gyromagnetic ratios of some biologically - relevant nuclei are shown in table ( [ tab : gyromag ] ) @xcite . [ tab : gyromag ] the bohr magneton , @xmath17 , and the nuclear magneton , @xmath18 , are named quantities related to the electron and proton gyromagnetic ratios respectively , and are given by , @xmath19 and @xmath20 the magnetic moment of the electron is much larger than that of the nucleons , and as is discussed below , this corresponds to smaller precession , pulse , and signal frequency for protons than electrons . specifically , nucleons precess , absorb , and emit electromagnetic signals in the radio frequency range . this range is non - ionizing radiation , and makes mri a safer choice than ionizing imaging modalities such as plane and computed tomography x - rays . the magnetic potential energy is , @xmath21 the force on a magnetic moment , the torque on a magnetic moment , and the larmor precession frequency or resonance frequency , can all be described in terms of the magnetic potential energy , @xmath22 . the magnetic moment aligns itself in either parallel or anti - parallel orientation to the external field @xmath23 . the extent of parallelism is constrained by the eigenvalues of the @xmath24 and @xmath25 operators above , such that from the geometry , the parallel and anti - parallel states make angles of @xmath26 degrees with the positive and negative z - axes respectively ( assuming @xmath23 is oriented exclusively along the z - axis ) . this process is called magnetization . in the case of a population sample , upon application of @xmath23 , the spin orientation distribution goes from a somewhat arbitrary array of directions to being composed of only two directions , parallel and antiparallel . the parallel orientation is the lower energy state , and thereby is the more populous state for protons in the sample . the population distribution is temperature dependent , such that the proportion of protons in the higher energy state increases with temperature . the relationship is given by , @xmath27 where @xmath28 is the higher energy state , @xmath29 is the lower energy state , @xmath30 is the energy difference between the two states , @xmath31 is the boltzmann constant , and t is the absolute temperature in kelvin . the bulk magnetization can be modeled as , @xmath32 with @xmath33 , it follows that @xmath34 and @xmath35 . in other words , the equilibrium magnetization is entirely along the @xmath36 ( longitudinal ) direction and there is no component in the @xmath37 ( transverse ) direction . the torque on a magnetic moment in a magnetic field acts to align it with the field , is a function of the magnetic potential energy , and is given by , @xmath38 where @xmath39 is the angle between @xmath40 and @xmath6 , and the minus sign indicates the restoring nature of the torque . the force on a nucleon or electron in a magnetic field is , @xmath41 when an external magnetic field @xmath23 is applied to an electron or neutron particle , the particle s magnetic moment precesses about the direction of @xmath23at a frequency called the larmor frequency given by , @xmath42 in the equilibrium magnetization state with @xmath33 and @xmath35 , there is no precession of the bulk magnetization @xmath3 because @xmath43 . considering only the spin of a spin 1/2 object in a magnetic field , and assuming @xmath44 , we get the following hamiltonian , @xmath45 where the subscript @xmath46 denotes either @xmath11 for electron or @xmath47 for a neutron , and where , @xmath48 it follows that , @xmath49 we see that remarkably , the hamiltonian is proportional to the z - component of spin , therefore the magnetic spin eigenstates are simultaneously energy eigenstates . furthermore the energy eigenvalues are proportional to the magnetic spin quantum numbers . specifically , @xmath50 the above relation led early researchers to the discovery of spin , by its manifestation as the zeeman effect and the splitting of energy levels in the hydrogen optical spectrum . given a bulk magnetization @xmath3 due to a static magnetic field @xmath51 , a pulse of a weaker magnetic field , @xmath5 , oscillating at the larmor frequency and applied perpendicular to @xmath23 , will result in a transition of the individual nucleons from dephased to in - phase oscillation . this manifests as the acquisition of a transverse phase @xmath52 and oscillations of @xmath3 about the z - axis at the larmor frequency @xmath53 . this `` tilting '' of the magnetization vector also implies a decrease in @xmath54 . during the pulse , the net external magnetic field is the sum of @xmath23 and @xmath5 . if the pulse duration was extended indefinitely , the result would be alignment of the bulk magnetization with the new direction , @xmath55 , and there would be no resultant oscillation observed . the pulsed nature of @xmath5 is therefore critical to the technology of magnetic resonance imaging . the net magnetization is given by , @xmath56 while the ratio of @xmath57 to @xmath58 is given in equation ( [ boltz ] ) above as , @xmath59 . at equilibrium , the solution of the above system of two equations yields the equilibrium magnetization , @xmath60 where @xmath61 is the reduced boltzmann constant and @xmath62 is the proton density . the spin - lattice relaxation , also known as @xmath63 relaxation or longitudinal relaxation , is the process of longitudinal magnetization recovery following a @xmath5 perturbation . specifically , @xmath63 is the time constant of longitudinal magnetization recovery , and is given by , @xmath64 where @xmath65 is equilibrium magnetization and @xmath66 is the longitudinal magnetization instantaneously after pulse excitation . in inversion recovery , the initial magnetization is negative , and typically @xmath67 . substituting this value into equation ( [ eqn : t2 ] ) above yields , @xmath68 fluid attenuated inversion recovery ( flair ) is useful in the diagnosis of certain pathologies such as periventricular white - matter lesion in multiple sclerosis . flair can be t1 or t2 weighted . figure ( [ fig : sag_t1_flair ] ) shows a sagittal section of a t1 flair brain image , and figure ( [ fig : t2_flair_b ] ) shows a t2 flair brain image . the spin - spin relaxation , also known as @xmath69 relaxation or transverse relaxation , is the process of transverse magnetization relaxation following a @xmath5 perturbation . specifically , @xmath69 is the time constant of transverse magnetization recovery , and is given by , @xmath70 where @xmath71 is the transverse magnetization instantaneously after pulse excitation . following the @xmath72 induction of in - phase precession , the proton spins again begin to dephase according to @xmath69 time constant . of note , the relaxation of transverse magnetization is faster than the recovery of longitudinal magnetization . in other terms , @xmath73 . figure ( [ fig : t2axfse ] ) shows a t2 fast spin echo image of acute ischemic stroke in the posterior circulation . upon pulse excitation and tilting , the magnetization vector oscillates about the z - axis . this oscillating magnetic moment in turn generates an electromotive force in accordance with faraday - maxwell law of electromagnetic induction , @xmath74 where @xmath75 is the curl operator , @xmath76 is the electric field , and @xmath77 is the magnetic field . the above equation can be rendered in integral form via stokes theorem to yield , @xmath78 where @xmath79 can represent a wire coil bounding a surface @xmath80 , @xmath81 is an infinitesimal segment length along the wire , and @xmath82 is vector normal to an infinitesimal area of @xmath80 . such integral transformation has certain advantages in numerical computation . for instance , green s functions approaches can be invoked and can greatly decrease the number of unknowns , thereby decreasing the computational resource demand of the problem . the radio frequency ( rf ) coils within the mri probe experience an electromotive force due to the rotating magnetization . this results in an electric current signal which is fed as output to a screen . the signal decays with time according to the @xmath69 time constant , hence the name free inductance decay ( fid ) signal @xcite . the bloch equations describe the time evolution of the bulk magnetization vector , and are therefore also referred to as the equations of motion of magnetization . they are given by , @xmath83 @xmath84 and @xmath85 where @xmath8 is the gyromagnetic ratio of the nucleon and @xmath86 there are several contrast agents in current clinical use , most of which are based either on low molecular weight chelates of gadolinium ion ( gd@xmath87 ) @xcite such as gadolinium - dpta , or are based on iron oxide ( feo ) such as fe@xmath88o@xmath89 , fe@xmath2o@xmath88 , and @xmath8-fe@xmath2o@xmath88 ( or gamma phase maghemite ) @xcite . based on their magnetic properties , they confer contrast of vasculature from background , and by proxy of vascularization density , of organs from surround . specifically , the gd@xmath87-based agents predominantly shorten @xmath63 time , while the feo - based agents predominantly shorten @xmath69 time . nanoparticle formulations of contrast agents are in various stages of development and can be based on gadolinium or iron - oxide , or on other agents such as cobalt , nickel , manganese , or copper ions @xcite . optimization of the efficacy of mr contrast agents is an active area of research @xcite . the growing array of mr contrast applications has included efforts to target tissue or tumor - specific receptors @xcite . serious adverse reactions to intravenous mri contrast agents are rare . however in the mid 2000s gadolinium chelates were increasingly hypothesized as playing a role in nephrogenic systemic fibrosis ( nsf ) , a disease entity unknown prior to 1997 . it has since been essentially established that gadodiamide , a gadolinium - containing agent , is associated with an increased risk of developing nsf in susceptible individuals @xcite . superparamagnetic iron oxides have been promoted by some as possible alternatives to gadolinium - based agents in patients at risk for nsf @xcite . for 3d localization , a gradient coil generates a magnetic field gradient in the bore . then in accordance with the larmor frequency relation @xmath90 , it follows that the resonance frequency , @xmath91 acquires space dependence , and thereby serves to effectively label the tissue in space . the process of space - specific excitation of the sample is called _ slice selection_. the excitation pulse frequency is simply chosen as a bandwidth frequency flanking the region - of - interest or the _ slice_. the process of _ scanning _ is an iteration , however simple or complex , through a sequence of slices . and slice thickness is proportional to excitation pulse bandwidth . the slice thickness can be decreased by decreasing the bandwidth , or alternatively by increasing the magnetic field gradient . for instance , given a constant magnetic field gradient , the slice thickness between two points @xmath92 and @xmath93 is given by , @xmath94 } = r_2 - r_1\ ] ] both the bandwidth and magnetic field gradient are graphical user interface ( gui)- adjustable parameters on current day mri machines . this gradient - based localization technique was paul lauterbur s contribution to the development of mri @xcite . the mri is a simple machine in principle . it was was invented by raymond v. damadian by 1971 @xcite . it consists of a magnet , a radio frequency coil , an empty space or bore , and a computer processor . the magnet is for applying the static and pulsed magnetic fields . current day machines typically use superconducting electromagnets . these are wire coils cooled to low temperatures using liquid helium and liquid nitrogen @xcite , allowing for greatly decreased electrical resistance , and consequently high current loops generating strong magnetic fields . the rf coil typically serves both as the generator of the pulsed magnetic field , and as the detector of the fid signal . such duality of function is possible simply because the maxwell - faraday equation is true in both directions . several machines also have a separate gradient coil . the gradient coil has @xmath46 , @xmath95 , and @xmath36 components indicating the spatial direction of the gradient field , and together conferring 3d localization . the computer processor runs the software instructions for pulse sequences and signals processing , including image reconstruction . mri requires strong magnetic fields . though the earth s magnetic field is variable with time and is asymmetric between northern and southern hemispheres @xcite , it is estimated to range between 25,000 and 65,000 nanoteslas ( 0.25 to 0.65 gauss ) at the surface , with a commonly cited average of 46,000 nanotesla ( 0.46 gauss ) @xcite . current clinical use mris commonly range from 1.5 tesla to 7 teslas . therefore mris may require magnetic fields up to 280,000 times the earth s magnetic field . this has been achieved by a shift from permanent magnets to superconducting electromagnets , and presents another interdisciplinary link to both theory and practice . the dominant physical theory of superconductivity is called bcs theory @xcite after its formulators , bardeen , cooper , and schrieffer , and is based on electron pairing via phonon - exchange to form so called cooper pairs . though electrons are fermions and subject to the fermi exclusion principle , precluding any two electrons occupying the same state , cooper pairs act like bosons because their pairing and spin summation results in integer - spin character , a type of boson - like state . upon cooling , these boson - like pairs can condense , analogous to bose - einstein condensation and representing a quantum phase transition . quantum phase transitions have historically been challenging to study in a controlled way in the laboratory , but have recently been demonstrated by h. t. mebrahtu et . al . in tunable quantum tunnelling studies of luttinger liquids @xcite . in superconductivity , upon transition into the condensed state , the coherence of the system imposes a high energy penalty on resistance , effectively resulting in a zero resistance state . this is formally encoded in the theory by an energy gap at low ( subcritical ) temperatures . in superconducting electromagnets , the coil cooling is done through liquid helium and liquid nitrogen and presents a connection to the chemistry of phase transitions , condensed matter and solid state physics , as well as the engineering aspects of attaining and maintaining such low temperatures . in this section , we review the mri modalities used in the assessment of acute ischemic stroke . the diffusion - weighted mri ( dwi ) modality exploits the brownian motion of water molecules within a sample , and the relative phase shift in moving water versus stationary water . the apparent diffusion coefficient ( adc ) is a parameter which can be mapped to provide diagnostic information . in acute ischemic stroke , cytotoxic cellular injury results in axonal edema and a subsequent decrease in brownian motion this is manifested as a hyperintensity on dwi and a hypointensity on the corresponding adc map . figure ( [ fig : dwi_2 ] ) is a dwi showing hyperintensity in the left mca and pca distributions , consistent with acute ischemic stroke . figure ( [ fig : adc_stroke_1 ] ) is an adc map showing hypointensity in the left mca distribution , consistent with acute ischemic stroke . figure ( [ fig : adc_pca_stroke_b ] ) shows an adc map with a left parieto - occipital hypointensity reflecting left posterior circulation acute ischemic stroke . in the subacute setting , the adc may normalize and even increase due likely to ischemia - associated remodeling and loss of structural integrity . the differential for hyperintensity on dwi includes hemorrhagic stroke , traumatic brain injury , multiple sclerosis , and brain abscesses @xcite . dwi has long been shown in animal models to be more efficacious than @xmath69-weighted imaging for the early detection of transient cerebral ischemia @xcite . additionally , dwi has been shown to be highly efficacious in the early detection of acute subcortical infarctions @xcite . dwi in conjunction with echo - planar imaging has been shown to effectively discriminate between high grade ( high cellularity ) and low grade ( low cellularity ) gliomas @xcite . of note , in spite of the relatively high specificity and sensitivity of dwi in the early detection of acute ischemic stroke , there is a small subset of stroke patients who evade dwi detection in spite of clinically evident stroke - like neurological deficits @xcite . dwi tractography or diffusion tensor imaging is a form of principal component analysis in which the dominant eigendirection is used to determine the path of an axonal tract in a given voxel . this method has shown potential for further elucidation of neuronal pathways in the brain . perfusion - weighted imaging ( pwi ) is an ordinary differential equations compartment model of blood perfusion through organs . an arterial input function ( aif ) is determined as input into the particular chosen model . the aif is an impulse , and the model is essentially described by an impulse response or green s function . the computed output are perfusion parameters such as mean transit time , time to peak , cerebral blood flow rate , and cerebral blood volume . there are various protocols for the perfusion conditions . for instance the dynamic susceptibility contrast imaging method uses gadolinium contrast to gather local changes in @xmath96 signal in surrounding tissue . @xmath96 is a type of @xmath69 in which static dephasing effects are not explicitly rf - canceled , therefore dephasing from magnetic field inhomogeneities and susceptibility effects contribute to a tighter fid envelope ( more rapid decay ; @xmath97 ) than is seen in @xmath69 . other pwi protocols include arterial spin labeling and blood oxygen level dependent labeling . not surprisingly , pwi results vary with the choice of perfusion model and computational method with which it is implemented @xcite . both pwi and dwi are efficacious in the early detection of cerebral ischemia and correlate well with various stroke quantitation scales @xcite . furthermore , the combination of diffusion and perfusion - weighted imaging allows for assessment of the ischemic penumbra , that watershed region at the boundary of infarcted and non - infarcted tissue @xcite . it represents tissue which has suffered some degree of ischemia , but remains viable and possibly salvageable by expedient intervention with thrombolytic therapy @xcite , hypothermia , blood pressure elevation , or other experimental methods under study . outside the penumbra , thrombosis or autoregulation of circulation shuts down perfusion to infarcted tissue , resulting in a drastic decrease in perfusion . diffusion is simultaneously decreased due to tissue ischemia , hence no pwi - dwi mismatch occurs . within the penumbra however , the tissue is hypoperfused , yet since still viable , it has yet to sustain sufficient cytotoxic axonal damage to manifest a significant decrease in diffusion . the registration of both imaging modalities therefore demonstrates a diffusion - perfusion mismatch at the penumbra . in set - theoretic terms , the brain territory @xmath98 with compromised diffusion is a proper subset of the territory @xmath99 with compromised perfusion , and the relative complement of @xmath98 in @xmath99 is called the _ ischemic penumbra _ @xmath100 , @xmath101 one caveat to pwi - dwi mismatch assessment is that when done subjectively by the human eye , it can be demonstrably unreliable @xcite . hence development of quantitative metrics and learning algorithms are needed in this area . for instance , generalized linear models have been used and shown promise @xcite . magnetic resonance spectroscopy ( mrs ) is being used in attempts to reliably measure the magnetic resonance of metabolites whose concentrations change in the setting of acute ischemic stroke . lactate ( lac ) levels are well known to increase in ischemia , and is therefore a candidate in development , while n - acetyl aspartate ( naa ) levels have been shown to decrease in acute stroke , and are used in proton spectroscopy studies . most studies confirming the ischemia - associated elevation in lac and decrease in naa have been done in the setting of hypoxic - ischemic encephalopathy in newborns @xcite . in addition to lactate , @xmath39-glx and glycine have also been shown to be increased in the asphyxiated neonate @xcite . phosphorus magnetic resonance spectroscopy detects changes in the resonance spectrum of energy metabolites , and has also shown prognostic significance in hypoxic - ischemic brain injury @xcite . in their current form , mrs methods are less sensitive and practical for the assessment of acute ischemic stroke than the other magnetic resonance modalities discussed here . however , mrs is rapidly finding a place in the routine clinical assessment of hypoxic - ischemic encephalopathy in the asphyxiated neonate . some neonatal intensive care units , for instance , now conduct mrs studies on all neonates below a certain threshold weight . the blood oxygen level - dependent ( bold ) mri is a magnetic resonance imaging method that derives contrast from the difference in magnetic properties of oxygenated versus deoxygenated blood . hemoglobin is the molecule which carries oxygen in the blood , and is located in red blood cells . the oxygen - bound form of hemoglobin is called oxyhemoglobin , while the oxygen - free form is called deoxyhemoglobin . deoxyhemoglobin is paramagnetic and in the presence of an applied magnetic field assumes a relatively higher magnetic dipole moment than oxyhemoglobin which is a diamagnetic molecule . deoxygenated blood has a higher concentration of deoxyhemoglobin than oxyhemoglobin , and this difference is reflected in the mri signal . @xmath96-based bold mri has shown promise in localizing the penumbra in acute ischemic stroke @xcite . it is also used in functional mri ( fmri ) , which is based on the principle that active brain areas have higher resource ( e.g. oxygen , glucose ) demands and higher waste output @xcite . in this context , bold has been used to study the brain s behavior during sensorimotor recovery following acute ischemic stroke . specifically , the coupling between bold and electrical neuroactivity has shed some light on the still poorly understood process of spontaneous motor recovery following a stroke @xcite . bold mri results can be affected by baseline circulatory status , and therefore in the research setting near - infrared spectroscopy ( nirs ) can be used as a control , or as an alternative modality in the clinic @xcite . bold mri has been used in assessing the brain s response to hypercapnia @xcite . hypercapnia can cause changes in multiple variables in the brain such as cerebral blood flow , oxygen consumption rate , cerebral blood volume , arterial oxygen concentration , and red blood cell volume fraction . however , hypercapnia - associated cerebrovascular reactivity has been strongly correlated with arterial spin labeling and other pwi surrogates , suggesting that the brain s reaction to hypercapnia is dominated by changes in cerebral blood flow @xcite . mra is a set of magnetic resonance - based techniques for imaging the circulatory system . figures ( [ fig : mracowax ] ) and ( [ fig : mralat ] ) show mra images of the circle - of - willis . mra techniques can be broadly categorized into flow - dependent and flow - independent groups . the flow - dependent methods derive contrast from the motion of blood in vasculature relative to the static state of surrounding tissue @xcite . two currently well - known and used examples of flow dependent methods are : ( i ) phase contrast mra , ( pc mra ) @xcite and ( ii ) time - of - flight mra ( tof mra ) . the tof mra images can be acquired in either two dimensional ( 2d tof ) or three dimensional ( 3d tof ) formats . figure ( [ fig:2d_tof_fspgr ] ) shows a 2d tof fast spoiled gradient echo sequence ( fsgr ) image of the carotids , and figure ( [ fig:3d_tof ] ) shows a an axial section of a 3d tof image of the carotids . pc mra exploits differences in spin phase of moving blood relative to static surrounding tissue , while tof mra exploits the difference in excitation pulse ( @xmath72 ) exposure of flowing blood relative to static surrounding tissue . this difference occurs because flowing blood spends less time in the field of exposure , and as a result is less spin - saturated then the surrounding tissue . this decreased spin - saturation translates into higher intensity signals on spin - echo sequences . flow - independent methods exploit inherent differences in magnetic properties of blood relative to surrounding tissue . for instance , fresh blood imaging is a method that exploits the longer @xmath69 time constant in blood relative to surround . this method finds specific utility in cardiac and cardio - cerebral imaging by using fast spin echo sequences which can exploit the spin saturation differences between systole and diastole @xcite . other examples include susceptibility weighted imaging ( swi ) and four dimensional dynamic mra ( 4d mra ) . swi derives contrast from magnetic susceptibility differences between blood and surround @xcite , while 4d mra uses time - dependent bit - mask subtraction after injection of gadolinium - dpta or some other pharmacological contrast agent @xcite . figures ( [ fig : swi_1 ] ) and ( [ fig : swi_2 ] ) show swi consistent with acute ischemic infarction in the left pca and mca distributions . of note , in the sense that 4d mra exploits the time interval between injection and initial image acquisition , it is arguably more flow - dependent than the other methods mentioned here in that category . hydrogen is the most commonly imaged nucleus in magnetic resonance imaging , due largely to the great abundance of water in biological tissue , and to the high gyromagnetic ratio of hydrogen . furthermore , hydrogen is the only atom whose schrdinger eigenvalue problem has been exactly solved . other hydrogenic atoms involve screened potentials and require iterative approximation eigenvalue problem solvers such as the hartree - fock scheme and its variants . in what follows we review the electronic orbital configuration of hydrogen . in this section we focus on the electron . specifically that lone electron in the orbit of the hydrogen atom . we make this choice because its simplicity allows us review the attributes of quantum orbital angular momentum and spin , in a context which is not only real , but also highly relevant to magnetic resonance imaging , which as noted targets the hydrogen atom . the electron in @xmath0h has both position and angular momentum . the hamiltonian commutes with the squared orbital angular momentum operator , therefore angular momentum eigenstates are also energy eigenstates . of note , the position and angular momentum observables do not commute . this is equivalent to heisenberg s uncertainty principle . hence definite energy or orbital angular momentum states , are represented in the position basis as probability density functions , which are synonymous with electron clouds or atomic orbitals . orbital angular momentum is the momentum possessed by a body by virtue of circular motion , as along an orbit . in quantum mechanics , the square of the orbital momentum is a quantized quantity , which can take on only certain discrete `` allowed '' values . this reality and discreteness of the orbital momentum eigenvalues is a manifestation of the spectral theorem of normal bounded operators ; given the hermiticity and boundedness of the quantum orbital angular momentum operator over a specified finite volume such as the radius of an atom ; which is itself a manifestation of the negative energy of the electron in orbit yielding a so called _ bound state_. the orbital momentum states can be indirectly represented by the spherical harmonic functions to be derived below . the spherical harmonics are the eigenfunctions of the squared quantum orbital angular momentum operator in spherical coordinates . their product with the radial wave functions yield the wave function , @xmath102 , of the hydrogen s electron . where in accordance with the principal postulate of quantum mechanics , @xmath103 is the probability of finding the electron at a given point @xmath104 . in the time - independent case , the hamiltonian defines the schrdinger equation as follows , @xmath105 the orbital angular momentum states are the angular portion of the solution , @xmath102 , of the schrdinger equation in spherical coordinates . substituting the expression for the hamiltonian of a single non - relativistic particle into equation ( [ eqn : schrodinger ] ) yields , @xmath106 where @xmath107 . in spherical coordinates the above equation becomes , @xmath108\psi(r ) \nonumber \\ + v(r)\psi(r ) = e\psi(r),\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath109 denotes mass . invoking the method of separation of variables , we assume existence of a solution of the form @xmath110 . we illustrate the method on the laplace equation which can be interpreted as a homogeneous form of the schrdinger equation , i.e. one for which @xmath111 , @xmath112 multiplying through by @xmath113 yields , @xmath114 which can be separated as , @xmath115 and @xmath116 we can again assume separability in the form @xmath117 , and substitute into equation ( [ eqn : angular ] ) above to get , @xmath118 from which we extract the following two separated equations , @xmath119 and @xmath120 our homogeneous equation has therefore been separated into three ordinary differential equations : equations ( [ eqn : radial ] ) for the radial part , equation ( [ eqn : azimuth ] ) for the azimuthal part , and equation ( [ eqn : polar ] ) for the polar part . solutions to the radial equation are of the form , @xmath121 where a and b are constant coefficients , @xmath122 is a non - negative integer such that @xmath123 , where @xmath109 is an integer on the right hand side of the azimuthal and polar equations . a regularity constraint at the poles of the sphere yield a sturm - liouville problem which in turn mandates the form @xmath124 . the coefficient @xmath125 is often set to zero to admit only solutions which vanish at infinity . however , this choice is application - specific , and for certain applications it may be appropriate to instead set @xmath126 . solutions to the azimuthal equation are of the form , @xmath127 where @xmath128 and @xmath129 are constant coefficients and @xmath11 is the base of the natural logarithm . to obtain solutions to the polar equation , we proceed in a number of steps . first we substitute @xmath130 , and recast equation ( [ eqn : polar ] ) into , @xmath131 next we compute the derivatives of @xmath132 under the transformation @xmath133 . employing the chain rule yields , @xmath134 and @xmath135 a substitution of the derivatives into the polar equation yields , @xmath136 dividing through by @xmath137 and changing variables via @xmath130 and @xmath138 , yields the associated ( @xmath139 ) legendre differential equation , @xmath140 whose solutions are given by @xmath141 the solution @xmath142 to angular portion of the laplace equation is therefore of the form , @xmath143 where n is a normalization factor given by , @xmath144 and enabling , @xmath145 where @xmath146 is solid angle . @xmath147 are called the spherical harmonic functions and are discussed some more in the following subsection . figures ( [ fig : shf_1_1 ] ) to ( [ fig : shf_5_2 ] ) are plots of a sampling of spherical harmonics with @xmath148 . for the electronic configuration of the hydrogen atom , the electron experiences a potential v(r ) due to the proton . v(r ) is the coulomb potential given by , @xmath149 substituting this into the generic schrdinger equation yields , @xmath150 which in spherical coordinates is , @xmath108\psi(r ) \nonumber \\ -\frac{e^2}{4\pi\epsilon_0r}\psi(r ) = e\psi(r ) , \label{eqn : schrodinger_evp}\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath109 is given by , @xmath151 and is the two - body reduced mass @xmath15 of the proton and @xmath12 of the electron . equation ( [ eqn : schrodinger_evp ] ) above is an eigenvalue problem which after some rearranging , we can solve using the same separation of variables method illustrated above . we recast as , @xmath152r(r)y(\theta,\psi ) \nonumber \\ + \left[\frac{1}{\sin\theta } \frac{\partial}{\partial\theta } \left ( \sin \theta \frac{\partial}{\partial\theta } \right ) + \frac{1}{\sin^2\theta}\frac{\partial^2}{\partial\phi^2}\right]r(r)y(\theta,\psi ) \nonumber\\ = 0\end{aligned}\ ] ] dividing through by @xmath153 and splitting the operator , we get , @xmath154y(\omega ) = -l(l+1 ) \label{eqn : shf2}\ ] ] and @xmath155= l(l+1 ) . \label{eqn : laguerre}\ ] ] equation ( [ eqn : shf2 ] ) is exactly the same as equation ( [ eqn : shf1 ] ) which we solved above , and whose solutions are the spherical harmonic functions , @xmath147 . equation ( [ eqn : laguerre ] ) above is isomorphic to a generalized laguerre differential equation , whose solutions are related to the associated laguerre polynomials . as mentioned in the case of laplace s equation above , regularity conditions at the boundary prescribe the separation constant @xmath156 . to transform equation ( [ eqn : laguerre ] ) into a generalized laguerre equation , we recast into the following form , @xmath157r(r)=0 . \label{eqn : laguerre2}\ ] ] then we proceed with the following sequence of substitutions : @xmath158 executing the first substitution above transforms equation ( [ eqn : laguerre2 ] ) into , @xmath159y(r)=0 . \label{eqn : laguerre3}\ ] ] next , the second substitution transforms the above into , @xmath160y(r)=0 . \label{eqn : laguerre4}\ ] ] and finally , the third substitution transforms the above into , @xmath161y(x)=0 \label{eqn : laguerre5}.\ ] ] dividing through by @xmath162 yields , @xmath163y(x)=0 \label{eqn : laguerre6}.\ ] ] next , we make the substitutions , @xmath164 and @xmath165 which transform equation ( [ eqn : laguerre6 ] ) into the following generalized laguerre equation @xmath166y_j^k(x)=0,\ ] ] whose solutions are readily verified to be the following associated laguerre functions , @xmath167 where @xmath168 are the associated laguerre polynomials . from equation ( [ eqn : lagsubs2 ] ) we see that , @xmath169 which we substitute into equation ( [ eqn : lagsubs3 ] ) to yield , @xmath170 @xmath171 is the principal ( or radial ) quantum number . the corresponding energy eigenvalues , @xmath172 , are obtained by substituting @xmath162 into @xmath173 and solving for @xmath30 , we get , @xmath174 where @xmath175 is the bohr radius and is given by , @xmath176 the value of @xmath172 in the ground state ( @xmath177 ) is called the rydberg constant . its value is shown in table ( [ tab : consts ] ) along with that of other physical constants pertinent to magnetic resonance imaging . the displayed values are from the 2010 committee for data on science and technology ( codata ) recommendations @xcite , and @xmath178 is the relative standard uncertainty . [ tab : consts ] to transform the radial equation solution , equation ( [ eqn : assoc_laguerre ] ) , into a form in terms of radial distance @xmath179 , and principal and azimuthal quantum numbers @xmath171 and @xmath122 , we note the following relations : from equation ( [ eqn : k_l_relation ] ) we get , @xmath180 from equation ( [ eqn : ndef ] ) we get , @xmath181 and from equations ( [ eqn : lagsubs1 ] ) and ( [ eqn : rydberg ] ) we get , @xmath182 therefore , @xmath183 substituting the above derived expressions of @xmath46 , @xmath184 , and @xmath31 into the associated laguerre function , equation ( [ eqn : assoc_laguerre ] ) , we get , @xmath185 next we make the substitution @xmath186 , which yields the radial solutions of the hydrogen atom , @xmath187 where the constant @xmath188 . following multiplication by the spherical harmonics and normalization , we obtain the exact solution of the time - independent schrdinger equation of the hydrogen atom , @xmath189 ^ 3}}e^{-r / na_0}\left(\frac{2r}{na_0}\right)^ll^{2l+1}_{n - l-1}\left(\frac{2r}{na_0}\right)y_{l , m}(\theta,\phi),\end{aligned}\ ] ] where the principal , azimuthal , and magnetic quantum numbers ( @xmath171 , @xmath122 , @xmath109 ) take the following values , @xmath190 in this section , we review the spherical harmonics and the radial wave functions . as noted above , the spherical harmonics , @xmath191 , are characterized by an azimuthal and a magnetic quantum number , @xmath122 and @xmath192 respectively . table ( [ tab : shf ] ) shows the spherical harmonics with @xmath122 = 0,1,2 , and 3 . formalism of state representation by the spherical harmonics is as follows , @xmath193 @xmath194 where , @xmath195 is the polar angle and @xmath196 is the azimuthal angle . the spherical harmonic representing rotation quantum numbers @xmath197 at position state @xmath198 , is given by @xmath199 [ tab : shf ] [ tab : radwavs ] the spherical harmonics are a complete set of orthonormal functions over the unit sphere . in particular , they are eigenfunctions of the square of the orbital angular momentum operator , @xmath200 . and are thereby representations of the allowed discrete states of angular momentum . @xmath200 can be arrived at by representing laplace s equation in spherical coordinates and considering only its angular portion . classically , angular momentum is : @xmath201 where @xmath202 is the position vector and @xmath203 is the momentum vector . by analogy , the quantum orbital angular momentum operator is given by , @xmath204 where @xmath205 is the gradient operator , and we have used the momentum operator of quantum mechanics , @xmath206 in spherical coordinates , @xmath200 is then represented by , @xmath207 and similarly , @xmath208 , @xmath209 , and @xmath210 are represented as follows , @xmath211 @xmath212 @xmath213 given the expressions above for @xmath214 , @xmath200 , and @xmath210 , it is readily shown that , @xmath215 and @xmath216 the square of the radial wave functions is the probability the electron is located a distance @xmath179 from the nucleus . table ( [ tab : radwavs ] ) shows the radial wave functions for @xmath171 = 1,2 , and 3 . @xmath217 = i\hbar \epsilon_{ijk}l_k,\ ] ] where @xmath218 is the levi - civita symbol given by , @xmath219 and i , j , k can have values of x , y , or z. @xmath220 = 0 \qquad \mbox{for } ~j = x , y , z\ ] ] the ladder operators act to increase or decrease the @xmath109 quantum number of a state and are given by , @xmath221 it is readily verified that , @xmath222 @xmath223 = \pm \hbar l_{\pm},\ ] ] and @xmath224 = 2\hbar l_z.\ ] ] spin is an intrinsic quantum property of elementary particles such as the electron and the quark . composite particles such as the neutron , proton , and even atoms and molecules also possess spin by virtue of their composition from their elementary particle constituents . the term spin is itself a misnomer , as a physically spinning object about an axis is not sufficient to account for the observed magnetic moments . the mathematics of spin was worked out by wolfgang pauli , who either astutely or serendipitously neglected to name it . this was wise , as later insight elucidated spin as an intrinsic quantum mechanical property with no classical correlate . spin follows essentially the same mathematics as outlined above for orbital angular momentum . this is by virtue of the isomorphism of the respective lie algebras of so(3 ) and su(2 ) groups . and is elaborated further in section ( [ sec : groups ] ) below . one notable difference is that half - integer eigenvalues are allowed for spin , while orbital angular momentum admits only integer values . the spin algebra is encapsulated in the commutation relations as follows , @xmath225 = i\hbar \epsilon_{ijk}s_k,\ ] ] @xmath226 = 0 \qquad \mbox{for } ~j = x , y , z,\ ] ] @xmath227 @xmath228 @xmath229 = \pm \hbar s_{\pm},\ ] ] and @xmath230 = 2\hbar s_z.\ ] ] the addition of spin and or of orbital angular momentum refers to the process of determining the net spin and or orbital angular momentum of a system of particles . for example , the spin of a hydrogen atom in its ground state , i.e. the @xmath231 state with zero orbital angular momentum , constitutes the composite spin of the electron and the proton . similarly , the nuclear spin , @xmath232 , is the composition of the spins of protons and neutrons in the nucleus of an atom . mathematically , the process is described by a change of basis . a change from the product space basis @xmath233 to the `` net sum '' space basis @xmath234 , where @xmath235 and @xmath236 . the representation of the sum space eigenstates in terms of the product space eigenstates are referred to as the _ clebsch - gordan coefficients_. @xmath237 where @xmath238 are the clebsch - gordan coefficients and are given by , @xmath239 and we have notationally represented the uncoupled product space basis by , @xmath240 here we review a procedural description of the addition of angular momenta . consider a hydrogen atom @xmath0h in the ground state . the spin contributors are the lone electron in the l=0 shell , and a proton which is the sole constituent of the nucleus . the possible configurations of spin are : @xmath241 where @xmath242 indicates spin @xmath243 ( spin up ) and @xmath244 indicates spin @xmath245 ( spin down ) . and where each of the above states are prepared by measuring @xmath246 , @xmath247 , @xmath248 and @xmath249 for each state . we are interested in the combined state of the two particle system , and this requires the quantum mechanical addition of angular momenta , or in this example , spin . the net result is a state @xmath250 whose spin can be determined by measuring @xmath251 and whose @xmath36-component of spin can be determined by measuring @xmath252 , where @xmath253 and @xmath254 . it follows that @xmath235 , and therefore the possible values of @xmath109 are 1 , 0 , 0 , -1 . this suggests a triplet state ( s=1 ) and a singlet state ( s=0 ) . the triplet state corresponds to m=1,0,-1 , and is given by , @xmath255 and the singlet state corresponds to , @xmath256 where upon designation of the top assignment @xmath257 , each of the other states are obtained by application of the ladder operators defined in equation ( [ eqn : spinladder ] ) . for example , @xmath258 to change to a representation in the uncoupled basis , we write , @xmath259 and therefore , @xmath260 which yields , @xmath261 finally to obtain the singlet state , we simply orthogonalize the above , yielding , @xmath262 the above procedure is easily carried out by a computer for any combination of particle spins . for many particle systems , for instance in the computation of nuclear spins or non - ground state @xmath0h configurations , the associativity property is used and the above description applies . in the above example , the factors @xmath263 are the clebsch - gordan coefficients . there are several openly available implementations of clebsch - gordan coefficient calculators , in addition to tabulations in handbooks of physics formulae @xcite . orbital angular momentum and spin are the source of magnetic resonance . their abstract mathematical description is group theoretic , and extends naturally into other fundamental physics such as the strong interaction of quarks in nucleons and nucleons in nuclei . the frenchman henri poincar commented that `` mathematicians do not study objects , but the relationships between objects '' . relationships between symmetry groups have indeed been the essential device for probing the unseen in the realm of high energy particle physics . for spin 1/2 particles such as the electron and the quark , the spin observable can be represented by the su(2 ) group . su(n ) is the group of @xmath264 unitary matrices with unit determinant , in which the group operation is matrix - matrix multiplication . similarly so(n ) is the group of @xmath264 orthogonal matrices of unit determinant , with matrix multiplication as group operator . analogous to the su(2 ) representation of spin , quantum orbital angular momentum can be represented by the so(3 ) group . both groups share a lie algebra , encoded in the commutation relations shown above , because they are isomorphic to each other . in particular , su(2 ) is a double cover of so(3 ) . the su(3 ) group models the interactors of the strong force in quantum chromodynamics ( qcd ) . a counterclockwise rotation by an angle @xmath265 about the x , y , or z - axes , can respectively be represented by @xmath266 the corresponding infinitesimal generators , @xmath267 , @xmath268 , @xmath269 respectively are : @xmath270 the corresponding lie algebra can then be readily shown to be : @xmath271 = i\hbar \epsilon_{ijk } g_k\ ] ] @xmath272 it follows that the generators of su(2 ) are the pauli matrices given by , @xmath273 the su(2 ) lie algebra is then prescribed by the following commutation and anti - commutation relations , @xmath274 = 2i\epsilon_{abc}\sigma_c , \ ] ] and @xmath275 which combine to give : @xmath276 where @xmath277 is the kronecker delta and @xmath278 is the anti - commutator . given @xmath279 , such that , @xmath280 we define an assignment , @xmath281 , such that @xmath282 where @xmath283 . it follows that , @xmath284 where @xmath232 is the @xmath285 identity matrix , @xmath286 are the pauli matrices , and we have used the einstein summation notation over @xmath47 . @xmath287 @xmath281 is a bijective homomorphism between @xmath288 and @xmath289 . and this shows @xmath288 is isomorphic to @xmath289 . the generators of the su(3 ) group are given by the gell - mann matrices : @xmath290 then defining @xmath291 , the commutation relations are , @xmath292 = i\sum_{c=1}^8f_{abc}t_c , \ ] ] and @xmath293 where @xmath294 and @xmath295 are the antisymmetric and symmetric structure constants of su(3 ) respectively . magnetic resonance imaging is an application of quantum mechanics which has revolutionized the practice of medicine . electrons , protons , and neutrons are magnets by virtue of their spin and orbital angular momentum . tissue is made of ensembles of such subatomic particles , and can be imaged by sensing their responses to applied magnetic fields . as discussed in this paper , a wide array of mri modalities exist , each of which derives contrast by specific perturbations of the magnetization vector . the potential of mri in the diagnosis and even the treatment of various diseases is far from fully realized . a quantum level understanding of magnetic resonance technology is essential for further innovation in this field . the author thanks his friends henok t. mebrahtu and peter q. blair for reading this manuscript and providing helpful feedback . and he thanks them for many enjoyable physics conversations over coffee . he thanks daniel ennis for making available his matlab code for plotting spherical harmonics . he thanks his lovely wife lisa m. odaibo for a helpful conversation on the clinical use of magnetic resonance spectroscopy in hypoxic - ischemic injury assessment in the neonate . and he especially thanks her for her love and support . the author thanks his entire family , and celebrates his father , dr . stephen k. odaibo , on his birthday today . he thanks him for being a kind wonderful father and example . he thanks those who contributed and are contributing to his education , including : dr . robert a. copeland jr . , dr . leslie jones , dr . janine smith - marshall , dr . bilal khan , dr . david katz , dr . earl kidwell , dr . william deegan , dr . brian brooks , dr . natalie afshari , dr . isaac o. karikari , dr . xiaobai sun , dr . mark dewhirst , dr . carlo tomasi , dr . john kirkpatrick , dr . nicole larrier , dr . brenda armstrong , dr . phil goodman , dr . joanne wilson and dr . ken wilson , dr . srinivasan mukunduan jr . , david simel , dr . danny o. jacobs , dr . timothy elston , drs . akwari , drs . haynes , dr . john mayer , dr . lex oversteegen , dr . peter v. oneil , dr . anne cusic , dr . henry van den bedem , dr . james r. ward , dr . marius nkashama , dr . michael w. quick , dr . robert j. lefkowitz , dr . arlie petters , and several other excellent educators and role models not mentioned here . signals processing plays an important role in magnetic resonance imaging , and is briefly reviewed in this appendix . the free inductance decay signal is often collected in the frequency domain and fourier transformed into the time domain @xcite . also with a gradual shift towards mri scanners of higher magnetic field , the signal - to - noise ratio requires increasingly more effective noise filtering algorithms . as signal generation and collection methods become increasingly more sophisticated e.g via spirals and other geometric sequences , non - uniform sampling , and exotic @xmath72 pulse sequence configurations , signals processing methods need to advance in tandem to address problems arising . computing speed also takes on new significance with such developments . indeed imaging and graphics applications have significantly driven the interest and funding for fast algorithms and computing . notable advancements include the fast fourier transform , the fast - multipole method of greengard and rokhlin @xcite , and parallel computing hardware such as the compute unified device architecture ( cuda ) multi - core processors by nvidia for graphics processing @xcite . furthermore , a new field is taking form at the interface of high performance software algorithms and multi - core hardware processors @xcite . we take a brief look at some of the basics of signals processing below , the fourier transform converts a time domain signal to its corresponding frequency domain signal , and is given by , @xmath296 = f(\omega ) = \int_{-\infty}^{\infty}f(t ) e^{-i\omega t}dt,\ ] ] while the inverse fourier transform converts a frequency domain signal to its corresponding time domain signal , and is given by , @xmath297=f(t ) = \int_{-\infty}^{\infty}f(\omega ) e^{i\omega t}d\omega.\ ] ] in practice , the discrete versions of the above equations are used instead , and give good results provided that signal data is sampled at an appropriate frequency , the nyquist frequency . given an mri signal of @xmath298 sample points , @xmath299 $ ] , where @xmath300 , the frequency domain representation is given by the discrete fourier transform , @xmath301 = \sum_{n = 0}^{n-1 } f[n]e^{-i2\pi\frac{k}{n } n},\ ] ] and the discrete inverse fourier transform is given by , @xmath302 = \frac{1}{n}\sum_{k = 0}^{n-1 } f[{\omega}_k]e^{i2\pi\frac{k}{n } n}.\ ] ] the above fourier formulas readily allow extension to two and three dimensions as well as various other customizations , tailored to suite the particular mri application and data format . the whittaker- kotelnikov- shannon- raabe- someya- nyquist theorem prescribes a lower bound on the sampling frequency necessary for perfect reconstruction of a band - limited signal . it states that given a band limited signal @xmath303 whose frequency domain representation is such that @xmath304 for all @xmath305 and some @xmath306 , then by sampling at a rate @xmath307 , the image can be perfectly reconstructed . the sampling interval is @xmath308 , and the discrete time signal is expressed as @xmath309 $ ] where @xmath171 is an integer . @xmath310 and is in units of hertz , hence @xmath311 is in seconds . the perfect reconstruction is given by the whittaker - shannon interpolation formula , @xmath312 \cdot \mbox{sinc}\left(\frac{t - nt}{t}\right),\ ] ] where sinc is the _ normalized sampling function _ given by , @xmath313 in practice , low - pass filtering methods can be used to decrease the amplitude of frequency components which exceed the effective bandlimit . the aliasing problem arises when the sampling rate @xmath314 is less than twice the bandlimit @xmath306 . the effect of this is that the reconstructed image is an alias of the actual image . the discrete time fourier transform ( dtft ) of a signal is given by , @xmath315e^{-i\omega n},\ ] ] and in the case of an under - sampled mri signal , the dtft matches that of the alias . therefore the reconstructed image is merely an alias . this phenomenon can be described more formally by invoking the poisson summation formula , @xmath316 where the middle term above is the periodic summation . for a bandlimited under - sampled signal , increasing the sampling rate to satisfy the nyquist criterion will restore perfect reconstruction . the convolution theorem facilitates application - specific image processing before or after reconstruction in either k - space or time domain . the theorem is given by , @xmath317 and states that the fourier transform of the convolution of two functions equals the product of the fourier transforms of both functions . where the convolution is defined as , @xmath318 100 m. abramowitz and i. a. stegun , _ handbook of mathematical functions : with formulas , graphs , and mathematical tables _ 55 , courier dover publications , 1964 . h. ay , f. s. buonanno , g. rordorf , p. w. schaefer , l. h. schwamm , o. wu , r. g. gonzalez , k. yamada , g. a. sorensen , and w. j. koroshetz , _ normal diffusion - weighted mri during stroke - like deficits _ , neurology * 52 * ( 1999 ) , no . 9 , 17841784 . d. azzopardi , j. s. wyatt , e. b. cady , d. t. delpy , j. baudin , a. l. stewart , p. l. hope , p. a. hamilton , and e. o. r. reynolds , _ prognosis of newborn infants with hypoxic - ischemic brain injury assessed by phosphorus magnetic resonance spectroscopy _ , pediatric research * 25 * ( 1989 ) , no . 5 , 445451 . m. babic , d. horak , p. jendelova , v. herynek , v. proks , v. vanecek , p. lesny , and e. sykova , _ the use of dopamine - hyaluronate associate - coated maghemite nanoparticles to label cells _ , international journal of nanomedicine * 7 * ( 2012 ) , 1461 . p. a. bandettini and e. c. wong , _ a hypercapnia - based normalization method for improved spatial localization of human brain activation with fmri _ , nmr in biomedicine * 10 * ( 1997 ) , no . 4 - 5 , 197203 . p. a. barber , d. g. darby , p. m. desmond , q. yang , r. p. gerraty , d. jolley , g. a. donnan , b. m. tress , and s. m. davis , _ prediction of stroke outcome with echoplanar perfusion - and diffusion - weighted mri _ , neurology * 51 * ( 1998 ) , no . 2 , 418426 . j. bardeen , _ theory of the meissner effect in superconductors _ , physical review * 97 * ( 1955 ) , no . 6 , 1724 . j. bardeen , l. n. cooper , and j. r. schrieffer , _ microscopic theory of superconductivity _ , physical review * 106 * ( 1957 ) , no . 1 , 162164 . to3em , _ theory of superconductivity _ , physical review * 108 * ( 1957 ) , no . 5 , 1175 . a. j. barkovich , k. d. westmark , h. s. bedi , j. c. partridge , d. m. ferriero , and d. b. vigneron , _ proton spectroscopy and diffusion imaging on the first day of life after perinatal asphyxia : preliminary report _ , american journal of neuroradiology * 22 * ( 2001 ) , no . 9 , 17861794 . p. barz , a. marmarou , p. fatouros , k. hayasaki , and f. corwin , _ contribution of vasogenic and cellular edema to traumatic brain swelling measured by diffusion - weighted imaging _ , journal of neurosurgery * 87 * ( 1997 ) , no . 6 , 900907 . c. l. bennett , z. p. qureshi , a. o. sartor , l. a. b. norris , a. murday , s. xirasagar , and h.s . thomsen , _ gadolinium - induced nephrogenic systemic fibrosis : the rise and fall of an iatrogenic disease _ , clinical kidney journal * 5 * ( 2012 ) , no . 1 , 8288 . m. a. bernstein , k. f. king , and x. j. zhou , _ handbook of mri pulse sequences _ , academic press , 2004 . m. n. biltcliffe , p. e. hanley , j. b. mckinnon , and p. roubeau , _ the operation of superconducting magnets at temperatures below 4.2 k _ , cryogenics * 12 * ( 1972 ) , no . 1 , 4447 . f. binkofski and r. j. seitz , _ modulation of the bold - response in early recovery from sensorimotor stroke _ , neurology * 63 * ( 2004 ) , no . 7 , 12231229 . e. brcher , _ kinetic stabilities of gadolinium ( iii ) chelates used as mri contrast agents _ , contrast agents i ( 2002 ) , 103122 . j. w. m. bulte and d. l. kraitchman , _ iron oxide mr contrast agents for molecular and cellular imaging _ , nmr in biomedicine * 17 * ( 2004 ) , no . 7 , 484499 . k. butcher , m. parsons , t. baird , a. barber , g. donnan , p. desmond , b. tress , and s. davis , _ perfusion thresholds in acute stroke thrombolysis _ , stroke * 34 * ( 2003 ) , no . 9 , 21592164 . c. calautti and j. c. baron , _ functional neuroimaging studies of motor recovery after stroke in adults _ , stroke * 34 * ( 2003 ) , no . 6 , 15531566 . m. cappellini , g. rapisardi , m. l. cioni , and c. fonda , _ acute hypoxic encephalopathy in the full - term newborn : correlation between magnetic resonance spectroscopy and neurological evaluation at short and long term . _ , la radiologia medica * 104 * ( 2002 ) , no . 4 , 332 . p. caravan , _ strategies for increasing the sensitivity of gadolinium based mri contrast agents _ , chem . * 35 * ( 2006 ) , no . 6 , 512523 . to3em , _ protein - targeted gadolinium - based magnetic resonance imaging ( mri ) contrast agents : design and mechanism of action _ , accounts of chemical research * 42 * ( 2009 ) , no . 7 , 851862 . p. caravan , j. j. ellison , t. j. mcmurry , and r. b. lauffer , _ gadolinium ( iii ) chelates as mri contrast agents : structure , dynamics , and applications _ , chemical reviews * 99 * ( 1999 ) , no . 9 , 22932352 . s. c. chang , p. h. lai , w. l. chen , h. h. weng , j. t. ho , j. s. wang , c. y. chang , h. b. pan , and c. f. yang , _ diffusion - weighted mri features of brain abscess and cystic or necrotic brain tumors : comparison with conventional mri _ , clinical imaging * 26 * ( 2002 ) , no . 4 , 227236 . l. n. cooper , _ bound electron pairs in a degenerate fermi gas _ , physical review * 104 * ( 1956 ) , no . 4 , 1189 . s. b. coutts , j. e. simon , a. i. tomanek , p. a. barber , j. chan , m. e. hudon , j. r. mitchell , r. frayne , m. eliasziw , a. m. buchan , and a. m. demchuk , _ reliability of assessing percentage of diffusion - perfusion mismatch _ , stroke * 34 * ( 2003 ) , no . 7 , 16811683 . s. c. cramer , r. shah , j. juranek , k. r. crafton , and v. le , _ activity in the peri - infarct rim in relation to recovery from stroke _ , stroke * 37 * ( 2006 ) , no . 1 , 111115 . r. a. crisostomo , m. m. garcia , and d. c. tong , _ detection of diffusion - weighted mri abnormalities in patients with transient ischemic attack _ , stroke * 34 * ( 2003 ) , no . 4 , 932937 . e. j. cukauskas , d. a. vincent , and b. s. deaver , _ magnetic susceptibility measurements using a superconducting magnetometer _ , review of scientific instruments * 45 * ( 1974 ) , no . 1 , 16 . r. damadian , _ tumor detection by nuclear magnetic resonance _ , science * 171 * ( 1971 ) , no . 3976 , 11511153 . r. damadian , k. zaner , d. hor , t. dimaio , l. minkoff , and m. goldsmith , _ nuclear magnetic resonance as a new tool in cancer research : human tumors by nmr _ , annals of the new york academy of sciences * 222 * ( 1973 ) , no . 1 , 10481076 . r. v. damadian , _ apparatus and method for detecting cancer in tissue _ , 1974 , us patent 3,789,832 . c. l. dumoulin and h. r. hart jr , _ magnetic resonance angiography . _ , radiology * 161 * ( 1986 ) , no . 3 , 717720 . c. l. dumoulin , s. p. souza , m. f. walker , and w. wagle , _ three - dimensional phase contrast angiography _ , magnetic resonance in medicine * 9 * ( 1989 ) , no . 1 , 139149 . r. r. ernst and w. a. anderson , _ application of fourier transform spectroscopy to magnetic resonance _ , review of scientific instruments * 37 * ( 1966 ) , no . 1 , 93102 . j. faiz kayyem , r. m. kumar , s. e. fraser , and t. j. meade , _ receptor - targeted co - transport of dna and magnetic resonance contrast agents _ , chemistry & biology * 2 * ( 1995 ) , no . 9 , 615620 . d. n. firmin , g. l. nayler , p. j. kilner , and d. b. longmore , _ the application of phase shifts in nmr for flow measurement _ , magnetic resonance in medicine * 14 * ( 1990 ) , no . 2 , 230241 . b. s. geisler , f. brandhoff , j. fiehler , c. saager , o. speck , j. rther , h. zeumer , and t. kucinski , _ blood oxygen level dependent mri allows metabolic description of tissue at risk in acute stroke patients _ , stroke * 37 * ( 2006 ) , no . 7 , 17781784 . c. b. grandin , t. p. duprez , a. m. smith , c. oppenheim , a. peeters , a. r. robert , and g. cosnard , _ which mr - derived perfusion parameters are the best predictors of infarct growth in hyperacute stroke ? comparative study between relative and quantitative measurements _ , radiology * 223 * ( 2002 ) , no . 2 , 361370 . l. greengard and v. rokhlin , _ a fast algorithm for particle simulations _ , journal of computational physics * 73 * ( 1987 ) , no . 2 , 325348 . to3em , _ a new version of the fast multipole method for the laplace equation in three dimensions _ , acta numerica * 6 * ( 1997 ) , no . 1 , 229269 . o. h. j. grhn and r. a. kauppinen , _ assessment of brain tissue viability in acute ischemic stroke by bold mri _ , nmr in biomedicine * 14 * ( 2001 ) , no . 7 - 8 , 432440 . f. hamzei , r. knab , c. weiller , and j. rther , _ the influence of extra - and intracranial artery disease on the bold signal in fmri _ , neuroimage * 20 * ( 2003 ) , no . 2 , 13931399 . p. hanover and b. eilhardt , _ conductor system for superconducting cables _ , january 1 1972 , us patent 3,634,597 . p. harish and p. narayanan , _ accelerating large graph algorithms on the gpu using cuda _ , high performance computing hipc 2007 ( 2007 ) , 197208 . m. hermier and n. nighoghossian , _ contribution of susceptibility - weighted imaging to acute stroke assessment _ , stroke * 35 * ( 2004 ) , no . 8 , 19891994 . m. l. hugh , _ low temperature electric transmission systems _ , 1971 , us patent 3,562,401 . g. e. jackson , s. wynchank , and m. woudenberg , _ gadolinium ( iii ) complex equilibria : the implications for gd ( iii ) mri contrast agents _ , magnetic resonance in medicine * 16 * ( 1990 ) , no . 1 , 5766 . c. w. jung and p. jacobs , _ physical and chemical properties of superparamagnetic iron oxide mr contrast agents : ferumoxides , ferumoxtran , ferumoxsil _ , magnetic resonance imaging * 13 * ( 1995 ) , no . 5 , 661674 . g. w. kabalka , e. buonocore , k. hubner , m. davis , and l. huang , _ gadolinium - labeled liposomes containing paramagnetic amphipathic agents : targeted mri contrast agents for the liver _ , magnetic resonance in medicine * 8 * ( 1988 ) , no . 1 , 8995 . s. kestur , k. irick , s. park , a. al maashri , v. narayanan , and c. chakrabarti , _ an algorithm - architecture co - design framework for gridding reconstruction using fpgas _ , design automation conference ( dac ) , 2011 48th acm / edac / ieee , ieee , 2011 , pp . 585590 . y. r. kim , i. j. huang , s. r. lee , e. tejima , j. b. mandeville , m. p. a. van meer , g. dai , y. w. choi , r. m. dijkhuizen , e. h. lo , and b. r. rosen , _ measurements of bold / cbv ratio show altered fmri hemodynamics during stroke recovery in rats _ , journal of cerebral blood flow & metabolism * 25 * ( 2005 ) , no . 7 , 820829 . h. kobayashi , m. w. brechbiel , et al . , _ dendrimer - based macromolecular mri contrast agents : characteristics and application . _ , molecular imaging * 2 * ( 2003 ) , no . 1 , 1 . s. d. konda , m. aref , s. wang , m. brechbiel , and e. c. wiener , _ specific targeting of folate dendrimer mri contrast agents to the high affinity folate receptor expressed in ovarian tumor xenografts _ , magnetic resonance materials in physics , biology and medicine * 12 * ( 2001 ) , no . 2 , 104113 . p. h. kuo , e. kanal , a. k. abu - alfa , and s. e. cowper , _ gadolinium - based mr contrast agents and nephrogenic systemic fibrosis _ , radiology * 242 * ( 2007 ) , no . 3 , 647649 . s. m. lai , t. y. tsai , c. y. hsu , j. l. tsai , m. y. liao , and p. s. lai , _ bifunctional silica - coated superparamagnetic fept nanoparticles for fluorescence / mr dual imaging _ , journal of nanomaterials * 2012 * ( 2012 ) , 5 . j. a. langlois , w. rutland - brown , and m. m. wald , _ the epidemiology and impact of traumatic brain injury : a brief overview _ , the journal of head trauma rehabilitation * 21 * ( 2006 ) , no . 5 , 375378 . p. c. lauterbur et al . , _ image formation by induced local interactions : examples employing nuclear magnetic resonance _ , nature * 242 * ( 1973 ) , no . 5394 , 190191 . n. lee , y. choi , y. lee , m. park , w. k. moon , s. h. choi , and t. hyeon , _ water - dispersible ferrimagnetic iron oxide nanocubes with extremely high r 2 relaxivity for highly sensitive in vivo mri of tumors _ , nano letters * 12 * ( 2012 ) , no . 6 , 31273131 . d. r. lide , _ crc handbook of chemistry and physics _ , crc press , 2012 . m. j. lipinski , v. amirbekian , j. c. frias , j. g. s. aguinaldo , v. mani , k. c. briley - saebo , v. fuster , j. t. fallon , e. a. fisher , and z. a. fayad , _ mri to detect atherosclerosis with gadolinium - containing immunomicelles targeting the macrophage scavenger receptor _ , magnetic resonance in medicine * 56 * ( 2006 ) , no . 3 , 601610 . a. y. liu , j. a. maldjian , l. j. bagley , g. p. sinson , and r. i. grossman , _ traumatic brain injury : diffusion - weighted mr imaging findings _ , american journal of neuroradiology * 20 * ( 1999 ) , no . 9 , 16361641 . d. h. live and s. i. chan , _ bulk susceptibility corrections in nuclear magnetic resonance experiments using superconducting solenoids _ , analytical chemistry * 42 * ( 1970 ) , no . 7 , 791792 . g. k. malik , m. pandey , r. kumar , s. chawla , b. rathi , and r. k. gupta , _ mr imaging and in vivo proton spectroscopy of the brain in neonates with hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy _ , european journal of radiology * 43 * ( 2002 ) , no . 1 , 613 . s.a . manavski , _ cuda compatible gpu as an efficient hardware accelerator for aes cryptography _ , signal processing and communications , 2007 . icspc 2007 . ieee international conference on , ieee , 2007 , pp . d. m. mandell , j. s. han , j. poublanc , a. p. crawley , j. a. stainsby , j. a. fisher , and d. j. mikulis , _ mapping cerebrovascular reactivity using blood oxygen level - dependent mri in patients with arterial steno - occlusive disease _ , stroke * 39 * ( 2008 ) , no . 7 , 20212028 . c. maneru , c. junque , n. bargallo , m. olondo , f. botet , m. tallada , j. guardia , and j. m. mercader , _ 1h - mr spectroscopy is sensitive to subtle effects of perinatal asphyxia _ , neurology * 57 * ( 2001 ) , no . 6 , 11151118 . p. marckmann , l. skov , k. rossen , a. dupont , m. b. damholt , j. g. heaf , and h. s. thomsen , _ nephrogenic systemic fibrosis : suspected causative role of gadodiamide used for contrast - enhanced magnetic resonance imaging _ , journal of the american society of nephrology * 17 * ( 2006 ) , no . 9 , 23592362 . m. p. marks , d. c. tong , c. beaulieu , g. w. albers , a. de crespigny , and m. e. moseley , _ evaluation of early reperfusion and iv tpa therapy using diffusion - and perfusion - weighted mri _ , neurology * 52 * ( 1999 ) , no . 9 , 17921792 . h. t. mebrahtu , i. v. borzenets , d. e. liu , h. zheng , y. v. bomze , a. i. smirnov , h. u. baranger , and g. finkelstein , _ quantum phase transition in a resonant level coupled to interacting leads _ , nature * 488 * ( 2012 ) , no . 7409 , 6164 . r. w. meyerhoff , _ superconducting power transmission _ , cryogenics * 11 * ( 1971 ) , no . 2 , 91101 . m. mikawa , h. kato , m. okumura , m. narazaki , y. kanazawa , n. miwa , and h. shinohara , _ paramagnetic water - soluble metallofullerenes having the highest relaxivity for mri contrast agents _ , bioconjugate chemistry * 12 * ( 2001 ) , no . 4 , 510514 . j. mintorovitch , m. e. moseley , l. chileuitt , h. shimizu , y. cohen , and p. r. weinstein , _ comparison of diffusion - and t2-weighted mri for the early detection of cerebral ischemia and reperfusion in rats _ , magnetic resonance in medicine * 18 * ( 1991 ) , no . 1 , 3950 . m. miyazaki , s. sugiura , f. tateishi , h. wada , y. kassai , and h. abe , _ non - contrast - enhanced mr angiography using 3d ecg - synchronized half - fourier fast spin echo _ , journal of magnetic resonance imaging * 12 * ( 2000 ) , no . 5 , 776783 . p. j. mohr , b. n. taylor , and d. b. newell , _ codata recommended values of the fundamental physical constants : 2010 . 2012 _ , e - print : arxiv . org / abs/1203.5425 . b. morgan , a. l. thomas , j. drevs , j. hennig , m. buchert , a. jivan , m. a. horsfield , k. mross , h. a. ball , l. lee , et al . , _ dynamic contrast - enhanced magnetic resonance imaging as a biomarker for the pharmacological response of ptk787/zk 222584 , an inhibitor of the vascular endothelial growth factor receptor tyrosine kinases , in patients with advanced colorectal cancer and liver metastases : results from two phase i studies _ , journal of clinical oncology * 21 * ( 2003 ) , no . 21 , 39553964 . m. e. moseley , y. cohen , j. mintorovitch , l. chileuitt , h. shimizu , j. kucharczyk , m. f. wendland , and p. r. weinstein , _ early detection of regional cerebral ischemia in cats : comparison of diffusion - and t2-weighted mri and spectroscopy _ , magnetic resonance in medicine * 14 * ( 1990 ) , no . 2 , 330346 . y. murata , k. sakatani , t. hoshino , n. fujiwara , t. kano , s. nakamura , and y. katayama , _ effects of cerebral ischemia on evoked cerebral blood oxygenation responses and bold contrast functional mri in stroke patients _ , stroke * 37 * ( 2006 ) , no . 10 , 25142520 . c. j. l. murray , a. d. lopez , et al . , _ global mortality , disability , and the contribution of risk factors : global burden of disease study _ , lancet * 349 * ( 1997 ) , no . 9063 , 14361442 . t. neumann - haefelin , h. j. wittsack , f. wenserski , m. siebler , r. j. seitz , u. mdder , and h. j. freund , _ diffusion - and perfusion - weighted mri : the dwi / pwi mismatch region in acute stroke _ , stroke * 30 * ( 1999 ) , no . 8 , 15911597 . e. a. neuwelt , b. e. hamilton , c. g. varallyay , w. r. rooney , r. d. edelman , p. m. jacobs , and s. g. watnick , _ ultrasmall superparamagnetic iron oxides ( uspios ) : a future alternative magnetic resonance ( mr ) contrast agent for patients at risk for nephrogenic systemic fibrosis ( nsf ) & quest _ , kidney international * 75 * ( 2008 ) , no . 5 , 465474 . j. nickolls , i. buck , m. garland , and k. skadron , _ scalable parallel programming with cuda _ , queue * 6 * ( 2008 ) , no . 2 , 4053 . a. nukada , y. ogata , t. endo , and s. matsuoka , _ bandwidth intensive 3-d fft kernel for gpus using cuda _ , high performance computing , networking , storage and analysis , 2008 . sc 2008 . international conference for , ieee , 2008 , pp . 111 . national academies ( us ) . committee on facilitating interdisciplinary research , committee on science , engineering , public policy ( us ) , institute of medicine ( us ) , and national academy of engineering , _ facilitating interdisciplinary research _ , national academy press , 2005 . opdyke and v. mejia , _ earth s magnetic field _ , geophysical monograph series * 145 * ( 2004 ) , 315320 . l. pan , l. gu , and j. xu , _ implementation of medical image segmentation in cuda _ , information technology and applications in biomedicine , 2008 . itab 2008 . international conference on , ieee , 2008 , pp . g. papamakarios , g. rizos , n .p . pitsianis , and x. sun , _ fast computation of local correlation coefficients on graphics processing units _ , proc . of spie vol , vol . 7444 , 2009 , pp . 7444121 . m. w. parsons , p. a. barber , j. chalk , d. g. darby , s. rose , p. m. desmond , r. p. gerraty , b. m. tress , p. m. wright , g. a. donnan , and s. m. davis , _ diffusion - and perfusion - weighted mri response to thrombolysis in stroke _ , annals of neurology * 51 * ( 2002 ) , no . 1 , 2837 . j. e. perthen , f. calamante , d. g. gadian , and a. connelly , _ is quantification of bolus tracking mri reliable without deconvolution ? _ , magnetic resonance in medicine * 47 * ( 2002 ) , no . 1 , 6167 . o. a. c. petroff , j. w. prichard , k. l. behar , j. r. alger , j. a. den hollander , and r. g. shulman , _ cerebral intracellular ph by 31p nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy _ , neurology * 35 * ( 1985 ) , no . 6 , 781781 . j. m. provenzale , r. d. tien , g. j. felsberg , and l. hacein - bey , _ spinal dural arteriovenous fistula : demonstration using phase contrast mra . _ , journal of computer assisted tomography * 18 * ( 1994 ) , no . 5 , 811 . k. n. raymond , v. c. pierre , et al . , _ next generation , high relaxivity gadolinium mri agents _ , bioconjugate chemistry * 16 * ( 2005 ) , no . 1 , 38 . g. rordorf , w. j. koroshetz , w. a. copen , s. c. cramer , p. w. schaefer , r. f. budzik , l. h. schwamm , f. buonanno , a. g. sorensen , and g. gonzalez , _ regional ischemia and ischemic injury in patients with acute middle cerebral artery stroke as defined by early diffusion - weighted and perfusion - weighted mri _ , stroke * 29 * ( 1998 ) , no . 5 , 939943 . h. j. rosen , s. e. petersen , m. r. linenweber , a. z. snyder , d. a. white , l. chapman , a. w. dromerick , j. a. fiez , and m. corbetta , _ neural correlates of recovery from aphasia after damage to left inferior frontal cortex _ , neurology * 55 * ( 2000 ) , no . 12 , 18831894 . m. rovaris , a. gass , r. bammer , s. j. hickman , o. ciccarelli , d. h. miller , and m. filippi , _ diffusion mri in multiple sclerosis _ , neurology * 65 * ( 2005 ) , no . 10 , 15261532 . w. rutland - brown , j. a. langlois , k. e. thomas , and y. l. xi , _ incidence of traumatic brain injury in the united states , 2003 _ , the journal of head trauma rehabilitation * 21 * ( 2006 ) , no . 6 , 544 . c. rydahl , h. s. thomsen , and p. marckmann , _ high prevalence of nephrogenic systemic fibrosis in chronic renal failure patients exposed to gadodiamide , a gadolinium - containing magnetic resonance contrast agent _ , investigative radiology * 43 * ( 2008 ) , no . 2 , 141 g. schlaug , a. benfield , a. e. baird , b. siewert , k. o. lvblad , r. a. parker , r. r. edelman , and s. warach , _ the ischemic penumbra _ , neurology * 53 * ( 1999 ) , no . 7 , 15281528 . l. c. shih , j. l. saver , j. r. alger , s. starkman , m. c. leary , f. vinuela , g. duckwiler , y. p. gobin , r. jahan , j. p. villablanca , p. m. vespa , and c. s. kidwell , _ perfusion - weighted magnetic resonance imaging thresholds identifying core , irreversibly infarcted tissue _ , stroke * 34 * ( 2003 ) , no . 6 , 14251430 . m. b. singer , j. chong , d. lu , w. j. schonewille , s. tuhrim , and s. w. atlas , _ diffusion - weighted mri in acute subcortical infarction _ , stroke * 29 * ( 1998 ) , no . 1 , 133136 . m. b. stearns , _ spin - echo and free - induction - decay measurements in pure fe and fe - rich ferromagnetic alloys : domain - wall dynamics _ , physical review * 162 * ( 1967 ) , no . 2 , 496 . g. strangman , j. p. culver , j. h. thompson , and d. a. boas , _ a quantitative comparison of simultaneous bold fmri and nirs recordings during functional brain activation _ , neuroimage * 17 * ( 2002 ) , no . 2 , 719731 . a. sturzu , s. sheikh , u. klose , m. deeg , h. echner , t. nagele , u. ernemann , and s. heckl , _ novel gastrin receptor - directed contrast agents - potential in brain tumor magnetic resonance imaging _ , medicinal chemistry * 8 * ( 2012 ) , no . 2 , 133137 . t. sugahara , y. korogi , m. kochi , i. ikushima , y. shigematu , t. hirai , t. okuda , l. liang , y. ge , y. komohara , et al . , _ usefulness of diffusion - weighted mri with echo - planar technique in the evaluation of cellularity in gliomas _ , journal of magnetic resonance imaging * 9 * ( 1999 ) , no . 1 , 5360 . v. n. thijs , d. m. somford , r. bammer , w. robberecht , m. e. moseley , and g. w. albers , _ influence of arterial input function on hypoperfusion volumes measured with perfusion - weighted imaging _ , stroke * 35 * ( 2004 ) , no . 1 , 9498 . h. s. thomsen , _ nephrogenic systemic fibrosis : a serious late adverse reaction to gadodiamide _ , european radiology * 16 * ( 2006 ) , no . 12 , 26192621 . p. thullen , j. c. dudley , d. l. greene , j. l. smith , and h. h. woodson , _ an experimental alternator with a superconducting rotating field winding _ , power apparatus and systems , ieee transactions on ( 1971 ) , no . 2 , 611619 . d. c. tong , m. a. yenari , g. w. albers , m. obrien , m. p. marks , and m. e. moseley , _ correlation of perfusion - and diffusion - weighted mri with nihss score in acute ( @xmath319 6.5 hour ) ischemic stroke _ , neurology * 50 * ( 1998 ) , no . 4 , 864869 . c. tu and a. y. louie , _ nanoformulations for molecular mri _ , wiley interdisciplinary reviews : nanomedicine and nanobiotechnology ( 2012 ) . f. h. r van der zande , p. a. m hofman , and w. h. backes , _ mapping hypercapnia - induced cerebrovascular reactivity using bold mri _ , neuroradiology * 47 * ( 2005 ) , no . 2 , 114120 . z. wang , j. m. van oort , and m. x. zou , _ development of superconducting magnet for high - field mr systems in china _ , physica c : superconductivity ( 2012 ) . e. c. wiener , s. konda , a. shadron , m. brechbiel , and o. gansow , _ targeting dendrimer - chelates to tumors and tumor cells expressing the high - affinity folate receptor _ , investigative radiology * 32 * ( 1997 ) , no . 12 , 748 . w. wiltschko and r. wiltschko , _ magnetic compass of european robins _ , science * 176 * ( 1972 ) , no . 4030 , 6264 . g. woan , _ the cambridge handbook of physics formulas _ , cambridge univ pr , 2000 . o. wu , w. j. koroshetz , l. stergaard , f. s. buonanno , w. a. copen , r. g. gonzalez , g. rordorf , b. r. rosen , l. h. schwamm , r. m. weisskoff , and a. g. sorensen , _ predicting tissue outcome in acute human cerebral ischemia using combined diffusion - and perfusion - weighted mr imaging _ , stroke * 32 * ( 2001 ) , no . 4 , 933942 . k. yamada , o. wu , r. g. gonzalez , d. bakker , l. stergaard , w. a. copen , r. m. weisskoff , b. r. rosen , k. yagi , t. nishimura , and a. g. sorensen , _ magnetic resonance perfusion - weighted imaging of acute cerebral infarction _ , stroke * 33 * ( 2002 ) , no . 1 , 8794 . h. zhu , d. g. buck , z. zhang , h. zhang , p. wang , v. a. stenger , m. r. prince , and y. wang , _ high temporal and spatial resolution 4d mra using spiral data sampling and sliding window reconstruction _ , magnetic resonance in medicine * 52 * ( 2004 ) , no . 1 , 1418 . Abstract:

Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.

Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered . Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video . Paper: recently , there has been a lot of interest in cosmological solutions in the presence of a cosmological constant , when the latter is significant compared to the present total energy density of the universe . indeed , the hubble diagram based on observations of type ia supernovae up to a redshift @xmath1 seems to imply that our universe is presently accelerating @xcite . these data , when combined with the observed location of the first acoustic peak of the cmb temperature fluctuations , favor a spatially flat universe whose energy density is dominated by a `` cosmological constant''-like term . the flatness of the universe is corroborated by the latest boomerang and maxima data @xcite , in accordance with the inflationary paradigm , though a marginally closed universe is still allowed by the position of the first acoustic ( doppler ) peak at @xmath2 . a significant cosmological constant may help in resolving the dark matter problem for dustlike matter alone observations seem to imply @xmath3 and in reconciling flat cold dark matter ( cdm ) models with observations in the framework of @xmath4cdm models . finally , a cosmological constant is an elegant way to allow a high hubble constant @xmath5 with @xmath6 and a sufficiently old universe @xmath7gyr @xcite ( see also , e.g. , @xcite for a recent comprehensive review and references therein ) . therefore , this interpretation , if confirmed by future observations , constitutes a fundamental progress towards the solution of the dark matter problem and the formation of large - scale structure in the universe out of primordial fluctuations generated by some inflationary model . that is certainly what makes it so appealing and gives it , maybe somehow prematurely , the status of new paradigm . a striking consequence for our universe is then its present acceleration , for a large range of equations of state @xcite . of course , from the point of view of particle physics , a pure cosmological constant of the order of magnitude @xmath8 , interpreted as the vacuum energy , is extremely problematic . this is why attempts were made to find some alternative explanation to the origin of the acceleration under the form of some scalar field @xmath9 ( sometimes called quintessence @xcite , `` @xmath4''-field , etc . ) whose slowly varying energy density would mimic an effective cosmological constant . this is very reminiscent of the mechanism producing the inflationary phase itself with the fundamental difference that this scalar field , which does not have to be _ a priori _ the inflaton , is accelerating the expansion today , therefore at a much lower energy scale . this of course has problems of its own as this effective cosmological constant term started dominating the universe expansion only in the very recent past ( the so - called `` cosmic coincidence '' problem ) . indeed , the energy density of the field @xmath9 must remain subdominant at very early stages and come to dominate in the recent past only . hence , specific evolution properties are required to meet these constraints and were indeed shown to hold for particular potentials , partly alleviating the problem of the initial conditions . for inverse power - law potentials the energy density of the scalar field was shown to decrease less rapidly than the background energy density so that it can be negligible in the early universe and still come to dominate in the recent past @xcite . for exponential potentials , @xcite the scalar field energy density has the very interesting behavior that it tends to a fixed fraction of the total energy density , these are the so - called `` tracker solutions '' . hence a pure exponential potential is excluded if data confirm that the energy density of the scalar field is dominating today , as this fraction had to be small at the time of nucleosynthesis . a slightly different potential is proposed in @xcite and a classification of the scaling behavior of the scalar field for various potentials has been given in @xcite . hence , though a minimally coupled scalar field is an attractive possibility , some degree of fine tuning still remains in the parameters of the potential @xcite . if one admits that it is some minimally coupled scalar field which plays the role of an effective cosmological constant while gravity is described by general relativity , the question immediately arises : what is the `` right '' potential @xmath10 of this scalar field ? in a recent work by starobinsky @xcite , the following `` phenomenological '' point of view was adopted : instead of looking for more or less well motivated models , like the interesting possibilities discussed above , it is perhaps more desirable to extract as much information as possible from the observations ( a similar approach can also be adopted to reconstruct the inflaton potential ) in order to reconstruct the scalar field potential , if the latter exists at all . cosmological observations could then be used to constrain the particle physics model in which this scalar field is supposed to originate . in the context of general relativity plus a minimally coupled scalar field , it was shown that the reconstruction of @xmath10 can be implemented once the quantity @xmath11 , the luminosity distance as a function of redshift , is extracted from the observations @xcite , something that is expected in the near future . can already be reconstructed from present experimental data , although not yet very accurately . ] the snap ( supernovae acceleration probe ) satellite will notably make measurements with an accuracy at the percent level up to @xmath12 . of course , in this way only the recent past of our universe , up to redshifts @xmath13 ( for reference , we will push some of our simulations up to @xmath14 ) , is probed and so the reconstruction is made only for the corresponding part of the potential . crucial information is therefore gained on the microscopic lagrangian of the theory through relatively `` low '' redshift cosmological observations . a further step is to generalize the same mechanism in the framework of scalar - tensor theories of gravity , sometimes called `` generalized quintessence '' . the usual minimally coupled models are certainly ruled out if , for example , it turns out that this component of the energy density obeys an equation of state @xmath15 with @xmath16 ( @xmath17 ) . strangely enough , such an unexpected equation of state which in itself implies new physics , is in fair agreement with the observations @xcite . also the inequality @xmath18 must hold for a minimally coupled scalar field , hence its violation would force us to consider more complicated theories , possibly scalar - tensor theories . there are also strong theoretical motivations . these theories , in which the scalar field participates in the gravitational interaction , are the most natural alternatives to general relativity ( gr ) . indeed , scalar partners to the graviton generically arise in theoretical attempts at quantizing gravity or at unifying it with other interactions . for instance , in superstrings theory , a dilaton is already present in the supermultiplet of the 10-dimensional graviton , and several other scalar fields ( called the moduli ) also appear when performing a kaluza - klein dimensional reduction to our usual spacetime . moreover , contrary to other alternative theories of gravity , scalar - tensor theories respect most of gr s symmetries : conservation laws , constancy of ( non - gravitational ) constants , local lorentz invariance ( even if a subsystem is influenced by external masses ) , and they also have the capability of satisfying the weak equivalence principle ( universality of free fall of laboratory - size objects ) even for a strictly massless scalar field . nevertheless , they can describe many possible deviations from gr , and their predictions have been thoroughly studied in various situations : solar - system experiments @xcite , binary - pulsar tests @xcite , gravitational - wave detection @xcite . finally these scalar - tensor theories could play a crucial role in the very early universe , for example in the pre big bang inflationary model ( see e.g. @xcite ) . thus , in this work we are investigating the possibility to have an accelerating universe in the context of scalar - tensor theories of gravity instead of pure gr . this has indeed attracted a lot of interest recently and such cosmological models have been studied and possibly confronted with observations like cmb anisotropies , or the growth of energy density perturbations ( see for instance @xcite ) . however , we emphasize once more that the central point of view adopted here , in analogy with starobinsky @xcite , is to constrain the model with the _ experimental _ knowledge of the hubble diagram up to @xmath13 . this is precisely why use of the redshift @xmath19 as basic variable is crucial for our purpose : quantities like @xmath20 are directly observable , in contrast to , say , can be obtained from the knowledge of @xmath20 thanks to the relation @xmath21 $ ] , but the directly observable quantity is @xmath20 . ] @xmath22 or @xmath23 . for instance , we have access to @xmath20 through the direct measurement of the luminosity distance in function of redshift @xmath11 . in a recent letter @xcite , it was shown that the knowledge of both @xmath20 and @xmath24 is sufficient to reconstruct the full theory ( again , in the range probed by the data ) . this means that we do _ not _ choose any specific theory _ a priori _ , but instead we reconstruct whatever theory possibly realized in nature . as we will see , the knowledge of @xmath20 on its own , though insufficient in order to fully reconstruct a scalar - tensor theory unless one makes additional assumptions , turns out to be already very constraining when subclasses of models are considered . this is particularly interesting because it means that cosmological observations at low redshifts implying an accelerated expansion might well give new constraints on scalar - tensor theories . we will show that this is indeed the case . throughout the paper , we use natural units for which @xmath25 , and the signature @xmath26 , together with the sign conventions of @xcite . in section ii , we introduce the general formalism of scalar - tensor theories of gravity and their different parametrizations . in section iii , we briefly review the severe experimental restrictions imposed on these theories _ today_. in section iv , we consider frw universes in the framework of scalar - tensor gravity and we give the equations for the different parameterizations . in section v , we review the full reconstruction problem . in section vi , we give a detailed study of subclasses of models , which are investigated using the background equations . finally , in section vii , our results are summarized and discussed . we are interested in a universe where gravity is described by a scalar - tensor theory , and we consider the action @xcite @xmath27\ . \label{s_jf}\ ] ] here , @xmath28 denotes the bare gravitational coupling constant ( which differs from the measured one , see eq . ( [ geff ] ) below ) , @xmath29 is the scalar curvature of @xmath30 , and @xmath31 its determinant . in ref . @xcite , we used different conventions ( corresponding to the choice @xmath32 in the above action ) ; here , the quantity @xmath33 is dimensionless . this factor @xmath33 needs to be positive for the gravitons to carry positive energy . the action of matter @xmath34 is a functional of some matter fields @xmath35 and of the metric @xmath30 , but it does not involve the scalar field @xmath9 . this ensures that the weak equivalence principle is exactly satisfied . the dynamics of the real scalar field @xmath9 depends _ a priori _ on three functions : @xmath33 , @xmath36 , and the potential @xmath10 . however , one can always simplify @xmath36 by a redefinition of the scalar field , so that @xmath33 and @xmath36 can be reduced to only one unknown function . two natural parametrizations are used in the literature : ( i ) the brans - dicke one , corresponding to @xmath37 and @xmath38 ; and ( ii ) the simple choice @xmath39 and @xmath33 arbitrary . this second parametrization is however sometimes pathological . [ the derivatives of @xmath9 can become imaginary in perfectly regular situations ; see the discussion about eq . ( [ positiveenergy ] ) below . ] in the following , we will write the field equations in terms of the two functions @xmath33 and @xmath36 , so that any particular choice can be recovered easily . the variation of action ( [ s_jf ] ) gives straightforwardly @xmath40 [ 2.2 ] where @xmath41 is the trace of the matter energy - momentum tensor @xmath42 . the scalar - field equation ( [ boxphi ] ) can of course be rewritten differently if one uses the trace of eq . ( [ einstein ] ) to replace the curvature scalar @xmath29 by its source , and one gets the brans - dicke - like equation @xmath43 where @xmath44 . [ in the brans - dicke representation where @xmath45 and @xmath46 , this factor @xmath47 reduces to the well - known expression @xmath48 . ] in the following , we will however use the form ( [ boxphi ] ) , which will simplify considerably our calculations . the above equations are written in the so - called jordan frame ( jf ) . since in action ( [ s_jf ] ) , matter is universally coupled to @xmath30 , this `` jordan metric '' defines the lengths and times actually measured by laboratory rods and clocks ( which are made of matter ) . all experimental data will thus have their usual interpretation in this frame . in particular , the observed hubble parameter @xmath49 and the measured redshifts @xmath19 of distant objects are jordan - frame quantities . however , it is usually much clearer to analyze the equations and the mathematical consistency of the solutions in the so - called einstein frame ( ef ) , defined by diagonalizing the kinetic terms of the graviton and the scalar field . this is achieved thanks to a conformal transformation of the metric and a redefinition of the scalar field . let us call @xmath50 and @xmath51 the new variables , and define @xmath52 [ 2.4 ] action ( [ s_jf ] ) then takes the form @xmath53\ , \label{s_ef}\ ] ] where @xmath54 is the determinant of @xmath50 , @xmath55 its inverse , and @xmath56 its scalar curvature . note that the first term looks like the action of general relativity , but that matter is now explicitly coupled to the scalar field @xmath51 through the conformal factor @xmath57 . quantities referring to the einstein frame will always have an asterisk ( either in superscript or in subscript ) , e.g. @xmath58 and @xmath59 for the covariant derivative and the dalembertian with respect to the einstein metric . the indices of einstein - frame tensors will also be lowered and raised with the einstein metric @xmath50 and its inverse @xmath55 . the field equations deriving from action ( [ s_ef ] ) take the simple form @xmath60 [ 2.6 ] where @xmath61 is the coupling strength of the scalar field to matter sources @xcite , and @xmath62 is the trace of the matter energy - momentum tensor @xmath63 in einstein - frame units . from its definition , one can deduce the relation @xmath64 with its jordan - frame counterpart . let us underline that the cauchy problem is well posed in the einstein frame @xcite , because all the second - order derivatives of the fields are separated in the left - hand sides of eqs . ( [ 2.6 ] ) , whereas they are mixed in the jf equations ( [ 2.2 ] ) . action ( [ s_ef ] ) also shows that the helicity-2 degree of freedom is described by the fluctuations of the einstein metric @xmath50 ( whose kinetic term is the standard einstein - hilbert one ) , and that the ef scalar @xmath51 is the true helicity-0 degree of freedom of the theory ( since its kinetic term has the standard form ) . on the other hand , the fluctuations of the jordan metric @xmath30 actually describe a _ mixing _ of helicity-2 and helicity-0 excitations , and the jf scalar @xmath9 is related to the helicity-0 degree of freedom via the complicated relation ( [ varphi ] ) , because its kinetic term in action ( [ s_jf ] ) comes not only from the naive contribution @xmath65 but also from the cross term @xmath66 . in conclusion , the theory can be mathematically well defined only if it is possible to write the ef action ( [ s_ef ] ) , notably with its negative sign for the scalar - field kinetic term ( so that @xmath51 carries positive energy ) . if it happens that the transformation ( [ 2.4 ] ) is singular for particular values of @xmath9 , the consistency of the theory should be analyzed in the ef . some singularities may be artifacts of the parametrization which is chosen to write action ( [ s_jf ] ) , and may not have any physical significance . on the other hand , jordan - frame quantities may look sometimes regular while there is an actual singularity in the einstein frame ( a typical example is provided when @xmath33 vanishes ) . in this case , the solution should be considered as mathematically inconsistent . in the following , we will see that the jf is better suited than the ef for our cosmological study , but we will always check the consistency of our results by finally translating them in terms of einstein - frame quantities . the predictions of general relativity in weak - field conditions , and at present , are confirmed by solar - system experiments at the @xmath67 level @xcite . one should therefore verify that the scalar - tensor models we are considering are presently close enough to einstein s theory . if the scalar field is very massive ( say , if @xmath68 is large with respect to the inverse of the astronomical unit ) , its influence is exponentially small in solar - system experiments , even if it is strongly coupled to matter . this situation corresponds to the particular scalar - tensor model considered in ref . @xcite ( namely @xmath37 and @xmath69 in action ( [ s_jf ] ) , but assuming a large enough value for @xmath70 ) . although this situation is phenomenologically acceptable , it remains somewhat problematic from a field theoretical viewpoint , since the massive scalar would _ a priori _ desintegrate into lighter ( matter ) particles . on the contrary , if the scalar mass is small with respect to the inverse solar - system distances , it must be presently very weakly coupled to matter for the theory to be consistent with experimental data . at the first post - newtonian order ( @xmath71 with respect to the newtonian interaction ) , the deviations from general relativity can be parametrized by two real numbers , that eddington @xcite denoted as @xmath72 and @xmath73 . in the present framework , they take the form @xcite @xmath74 [ 3.1 ] where the first expressions are given in terms of the einstein - frame notation ( [ s_ef])-([alpha ] ) , whereas the last ones correspond to the jordan - frame general representation ( [ s_jf ] ) . to simplify , the second expression of eq . ( [ betappn ] ) has been written in terms of the derivative of ( [ gammappn ] ) with respect to @xmath9 . using the upper bounds on @xmath73 from solar - system measurements @xcite , we thus get the constraint @xmath75 where an index @xmath76 means the present value of the corresponding quantity . on the other hand , the experimental bounds on @xmath72 can not be used to constrain the derivative @xmath77 appearing in eq . ( [ betappn ] ) , since it is multiplied by a factor @xmath78 consistent with 0 . because of nonperturbative strong - field effects , binary - pulsar tests are however directly sensitive to this derivative , _ i.e. _ , to the ratio @xmath79 . in a generic class of scalar - tensor models , refs . @xcite have obtained the bound @xmath80 from action eq . ( [ s_jf ] ) , one can naively define newton s gravitational constant as the inverse factor of the curvature scalar @xmath29 : @xmath81 however , @xmath82 does not have the same physical meaning as newton s gravitational constant in gr . indeed , the actual newtonian force measured ( in cavendish - type experiments ) between two close test masses @xmath83 and @xmath84 is of the form @xmath85 , where the effective gravitational constant reads @xcite @xmath86 the contribution @xmath87 is due to the exchange of a graviton between the two bodies , whereas @xmath88 comes from the exchange of a scalar particle between them . of course , when the distance between the bodies becomes larger than the inverse mass of the scalar field , its influence becomes negligible and one gets @xmath89 . note that as usual , the last expression in eq . ( [ geff ] ) , in terms of jordan - frame notation , is much more complicated than its einstein - frame counterpart . in the particular brans - dicke representation , @xmath45 and @xmath46 , it however reduces to the simpler ( and well - known ) form @xmath90 . the experimental bound ( [ df0 ] ) shows that the present values of @xmath91 and @xmath82 differ by less than @xmath92 . however , they can _ a priori _ differ significantly in the past . it should be noted that the experimental limit on the time variation of the gravitational constant , @xmath93 @xcite , does _ not _ imply any constraint on @xmath94 . indeed , @xmath91 can be almost constant even if @xmath95 ( or @xmath96 ) varies significantly . a simple example is provided by barker s theory @xcite , in which @xmath97 : one gets @xmath98 , which is strictly constant independently of the time variations of @xmath99 . nevertheless , as pointed out in @xcite , under reasonable cosmological assumptions , one can derive @xmath100 with @xmath101 accuracy up to redshifts @xmath102 . the equations derived in this section generalize those of our previous paper @xcite in several ways . first , we use the most general representation ( [ s_jf ] ) of the theory , instead of the simpler choice @xmath103 that was made in @xcite . second , we take into account a possible spatial curvature of the universe , which will be an interesting possibility in our studies of sec . third , we write the equations for an arbitrary pressure of the perfect fluid describing matter in the universe . this will not be useful for our reconstruction program of the following sections , as matter can be assumed to be simply dustlike for the redshifts @xmath104 that we will consider , but these general equations may be interesting for further cosmological studies of earlier epochs of the universe . finally , we comment on the einstein - frame version of these equations , which are mathematically simpler , but actually more difficult to use for our purpose . we consider a friedmann - robertson - walker ( frw ) universe whose background metric in the jordan frame is given by @xmath105 [ 4.1 ] where @xmath106 , @xmath76 , or @xmath107 for spatially open , flat , or closed universes respectively . the scalar field @xmath9 ( or @xmath51 , in the ef ) is also assumed to depend only on time . since the relation between the ef and jf is given by @xmath108 , see eqs . ( [ 2.4 ] ) , our universe is still of the frw type in the ef , with @xmath109 and @xmath110 in the following , matter will be described by a perfect fluid , and we will write its energy - momentum tensor as @xmath111 where @xmath112 and @xmath113 are the spacetime components of the four - dimensional unit velocity of matter , in jf and ef units respectively . as we are interested in a frw background , the spatial components @xmath114 and @xmath115 ( @xmath116 ) all vanish . from ( [ t ] ) , we deduce the relation between the matter density and pressure in both frames : @xmath117 the background equations in the jf follow from ( [ einstein])([matter ] ) , and read @xmath118 [ 4.5 ] where @xmath119 , and a dot denotes differentiation with respect to the jordan - frame time @xmath120 . as usual , if @xmath121 , eq . ( [ dmatter ] ) is trivially integrated as @xmath122 ( and in particular @xmath123 for dustlike matter ) . equation ( [ ddotphi ] ) is actually a consequence of the other three , and we will not need it in the following . since these equations correspond to the most general parametrization ( [ s_jf ] ) of scalar - tensor theories , many particular cases are easily recovered . for instance , the case of a minimally coupled scalar field @xcite is obtained for constant values of @xmath96 and @xmath124 ( say , @xmath125 and @xmath126 ) , and the particular model considered in @xcite is recovered immediately for @xmath45 and @xmath127 . the corresponding background equations in the ef are very similar to those in general relativity . they follow from eq . ( [ einstein * ] ) , and read @xmath128 [ 4.6 ] where @xmath129 is the einstein - frame hubble parameter . it is obvious from ( [ acc ] ) that a vanishing potential @xmath130 implies @xmath131 , so that the universe is decelerating in the einstein frame . however , because of the relation @xmath132 , see eq . ( [ avsa * ] ) , the _ observed _ ( jordan - frame ) expansion rate @xmath133 may be positive even in this case , and we will see concrete examples in sec . vi.a below . this is an important point to remember : although we are looking for cosmological frw backgrounds whose expansion is accelerating , the sign of @xmath134 is _ a priori _ not fixed . the scalar - field equation of motion in the ef follows from eq . ( [ boxvarphi ] ) , and reads @xmath135 it is also similar to the usual klein - gordon equation , with the notable difference of a source term on the right - hand side , with the coupling strength @xmath136 defined in eq . ( [ alpha ] ) above . it is tempting to tackle our problem in the ef as the equations are simpler and we can rely on experience gained in general relativity . however , a crucial difficulty that we encounter is that all physical quantities which appear in the ef background equations are not those that come from observations . moreover , the behavior of matter in the ef is complicated by the relations ( [ rho*vsrho ] ) : instead of the simple power law @xmath137 for dustlike matter in the jf , one gets @xmath138 in the ef , where @xmath139 can have _ a priori _ any shape . to avoid these problems , we will thus work in the jf , and show that the `` reconstruction '' program can equally well be implemented , like in general relativity , although it is mathematically very different . we will nevertheless check at the end the consistency of the solutions obtained by translating them in terms of ef quantities . we now consider the perturbations in the longitudinal gauge . for this problem , we will restrict our discussion to the case of a spatially flat frw universe ( @xmath140 ) , and write the jf and ef metrics as @xmath141 [ 4.8 ] in the ef , the perturbation equations deriving from eq . ( [ einstein * ] ) are strictly the same as in general relativity plus a minimally coupled scalar field . one thus finds notably @xmath142 . on the other hand , the equations for scalar - field and matter perturbations are modified by the matter - scalar coupling , proportional to @xmath136 in eqs . ( [ boxvarphi ] ) and ( [ matter * ] ) . for our purpose , it will be more useful to write the perturbation equations in the ( physical ) jf . let us define the gauge invariant quantity introduced in @xcite : @xmath143 . ] @xmath144 where @xmath145 is the matter peculiar velocity potential ( such that @xmath146 is the perturbation of the four - dimensional unit velocity @xmath147 ) . we now work in fourier space , and assume a spatial dependence @xmath148 , with @xmath149 . the conservation equations of matter ( [ matter ] ) give @xmath150 [ 4.10 ] on the other hand , the einstein equations ( [ einstein ] ) give @xmath151 [ 4.11 ] note that @xmath152 in the jf , in contrast to the corresponding problem in general relativity or in the ef . equation ( [ psi ] ) is actually an obvious consequence of the relation between @xmath50 and @xmath30 , eq . ( [ g * ] ) , and of the fact that @xmath153 . finally , eq . ( [ boxphi ] ) yields the equation for the dilaton fluctuations @xmath154 : @xmath155\delta\phi = \nonumber\\ & & = \left[{k^2 \over a^2}(\phi-2\psi ) - 3(\ddot\psi+4h\dot\psi+h\dot\phi)\right]{1\over z}\,{df\over d\phi } + ( 3\dot\psi+\dot\phi)\dot\phi - 2\,{\phi\over z}\,{du\over d\phi}\ . \label{fluctphi}\end{aligned}\ ] ] in the particular representation @xmath103 used in ref . @xcite , this equation reduces to the simpler form @xmath156\delta\phi = \nonumber\\ & = & \left[{k^2 \over a^2}(\phi-2\psi ) - 3(\ddot\psi+4h\dot\psi+h\dot\phi)\right]{df\over d\phi } + ( 3\dot\psi+\dot\phi)\dot\phi - 2\phi\,{du\over d\phi}\ . \label{fluctphiz1}\end{aligned}\ ] ] the reconstruction of the potential @xmath10 was shown in @xcite to be possible in the framework of general relativity plus a minimally coupled scalar field , the @xmath4-field or quintessence , provided the hubble diagram ( and thus also @xmath20 ) can be extracted from the observations . an essential difference arises when one deals with scalar - tensor theories : we have to reconstruct two unknown functions instead of one , hence we need to extract two quantities ( as functions of the redshift @xmath157 ) from the observations . actually , in the minimally coupled case , the knowledge of the luminosity distance @xmath158 and of the clustering of matter @xmath159 , both in function of @xmath19 , provides two independent ways to reconstruct the scalar field potential @xcite . without any ambiguity in the minimally coupled case , one needs to know both @xmath11 and the present energy density of dustlike matter @xmath160 , or both @xmath24 and the present value of the hubble constant @xmath5 . in our general scalar - tensor case , we need to know the two functions @xmath11 and @xmath24 , but no independent measurement of @xmath160 or @xmath5 is necessary . ] in our case , both quantities are necessary and the reconstruction itself is significantly more complicated . the present section generalizes our previous results of ref . @xcite not only by considering the most general parametrization ( [ s_jf ] ) of scalar - tensor theories and by taking into account the possible spatial curvature of the universe , but also by discussing particular cases that were excluded in this reference . from now on , we will restrict our discussion to the case of a pressureless perfect fluid ( @xmath161 ) , because all matter in the universe will be assumed to be simply dustlike , of course besides that part needed to account for the present accelerated expansion ( _ i.e. _ , the scalar field in the present framework ) . the first step of the reconstruction program is the same as in general relativity , since it is purely kinematical and does not depend on the field content of the theory : if the luminosity distance @xmath158 is experimentally determined as a function of the redshift @xmath19 , one can deduce the quantity @xmath20 from the relation @xmath162^{-1/2 } , \label{hvsdl}\ ] ] where the prime denotes the derivative with respect to @xmath19 . the large square brackets contain a corrective factor involving the present energy contribution @xmath163 of the spatial curvature of the universe . it was not written explicitly in refs . @xcite , which focused their discussions on the flat - space case ( @xmath164 ) , but it is a straightforward consequence of eqs . ( 23)(25 ) of ref . since present experimental data suggest that @xmath165 is small , the flat - space expression for @xmath166'$ ] is _ a priori _ a good approximation anyway . note that even if one uses the exact equation ( [ hvsdl ] ) , it reduces to the flat - space expression for @xmath167 ( because @xmath168 ) , and therefore @xmath5 is always known without any ambiguity . to determine @xmath20 precisely at higher @xmath19 , one then needs to know both @xmath11 and @xmath169 . by eliminating @xmath170 from the background equations ( [ h2 ] ) and ( [ doth ] ) , we then obtain the equation @xmath171 which , when rewritten in terms of the redshift @xmath19 , gives the fundamental equation @xmath172~f ' + \left[\frac{6}{(1+z)^2 } - \frac{2}{1+z}(\ln h)'-4\left({h_0\over h}\right)^2\omega_{\kappa,0}\right]~f = & & \nonumber\\ = \frac{2 u}{(1+z)^2 h^2 } + 3 ( 1+z ) \left({h_0\over h}\right)^2 f_0 \omega_{m,0}\ . & & \label{f}\end{aligned}\ ] ] as before , an index @xmath76 means the present value of the corresponding quantity , and we use again the notation @xmath173 . in this equation , @xmath174 stands for the present energy density of dustlike matter relative to the critical density @xmath175 . to simplify , this critical density is defined in terms of the present value of newton s gravitational constant ( [ g_n ] ) , @xmath176 , instead of the effective gravitational constant ( [ geff ] ) actually measured in cavendish - type experiments . indeed , solar - system experiments tell us that their present values differ by less than @xmath92 , as discussed in sec . [ note in passing that by changing the value of @xmath28 , one can always set @xmath177 without loss of generality . ] in conclusion , we are left with a non - homogeneous second order differential equation for the function @xmath178 , a situation very different from that prevailing in general relativity . however , the right - hand side also depends on the unknown potential @xmath179 , so that this equation does not suffice to fully reconstruct the microscopic lagrangian of the theory . as we will show in sec . vi below , it can nevertheless be used for a systematic study of several scalar - tensor models , provided one of the two unknown functions is given ( or a functional dependence between them is assumed ) . this can be useful as we do not expect a simultaneous release of data yielding @xmath20 and @xmath24 . we will see that such a study already yields powerful constraints on the family of theories which are viable . on the other hand , if @xmath24 is also experimentally determined , and if we assume a spatially flat frw universe ( @xmath180 ) , we will see in the next subsection ( v.b ) that the value of @xmath160 as well as the function @xmath178 can be obtained independently of @xmath179 . equation ( [ f ] ) then gives @xmath179 in an _ algebraic _ way from our knowledge of @xmath20 , @xmath178 and @xmath160 . let us now assume that both @xmath178 and @xmath179 are known , either because one of them was given from theoretical naturalness assumptions , or because @xmath24 has been experimentally determined with sufficient accuracy . we will also assume that both @xmath160 and @xmath169 are known . it is then straightforward to reconstruct the various functions of @xmath9 entering the microscopic lagrangian ( [ s_jf ] ) . in the brans - dicke representation , one has @xmath45 , therefore the knowledge of @xmath178 and @xmath179 suffices to reconstruct the potential @xmath10 in a parametric way . however , to fully determine the theory , one also needs to know @xmath181 , or equivalently an equation giving the @xmath19-dependence of @xmath124 . on the other hand , in the simpler representation @xmath182 and @xmath33 unknown , we need an equation giving the @xmath19-dependence of @xmath9 to reconstruct @xmath33 and @xmath10 parametrically . these two cases , as well as any other possible parametrization of the theory , are solved thanks to eq . ( [ doth ] ) above , which reads in function of the redshift @xmath183~f ' + 2\left[\frac{(\ln h)'}{1+z } - \left({h_0\over h}\right)^2\omega_{\kappa,0}\right]~f \nonumber\\ & & - 3(1+z)\left({h_0\over h}\right)^2 f_0 \omega_{m,0}\ , \label{phi}\end{aligned}\ ] ] or equivalently @xmath184 in the @xmath182 representation , @xmath185 is thus obtained by a simple integration . in the brans - dicke representation , on the other hand , @xmath186 is given by an _ algebraic _ equation in terms of @xmath20 , @xmath187 , and their derivatives . it is rather obvious but anyway important to note that if the microscopic lagrangian ( [ s_jf ] ) can be reconstructed in the jf , it can also be directly obtained in the ef , eq . ( [ s_ef ] ) . this allows us to check the mathematical consistency of the theory , and notably if the helicity-0 degree of freedom @xmath51 always carries positive energy . one can also verify that the function @xmath188 defining the coupling of matter to the scalar field is well defined , and notably single valued . finally , the second derivative of the potential @xmath130 also gives us the sign of the square of the scalar mass , and negative values would strongly indicate an instability of the model . these important features can not easily be checked in the jf , because the sign of @xmath36 in eq . ( [ s_jf ] ) is not directly related to the positivity of the scalar - field energy ( see below ) , and also because the second derivative of @xmath10 does not give the precise value of its squared mass . [ as shown by eq . ( [ v ] ) , the helicity-0 degree of freedom @xmath51 may have a mass , @xmath189 , even if @xmath10 is strictly constant , provided @xmath33 varies . ] let us thus assume that @xmath20 , @xmath160 and @xmath169 are known , and that @xmath178 and @xmath179 were reconstructed as above . equation ( [ a ] ) then gives @xmath190 , _ i.e. _ , the einstein - frame coupling factor @xmath95 as a function of the _ jordan - frame _ redshift @xmath19 ( which is the redshift we observe ) . combining now eq . ( [ varphi ] ) with ( [ phi ] ) , we get @xmath191{f'\over f } + { ( \ln h ) ' \over 1+z}\nonumber\\ & & -\left({h_0\over h}\right)^2\omega_{\kappa,0 } -{3\over 2}(1+z)\left({h_0\over h}\right)^2 { f_0\over f}\ , \omega_{m,0}\ , \label{varphiprime}\end{aligned}\ ] ] [ 5.5 ] or also , not eliminating the potential @xmath192 @xmath193 the ef scalar @xmath51 is thus also known as a function of the _ jordan - frame _ redshift @xmath19 ( up to an additive constant @xmath194 which can be chosen to vanish without loss of generality ) , and one can reconstruct @xmath188 in a parametric way . similarly , the ef potential @xmath130 , eq . ( [ v ] ) , can be reconstructed from our knowledge of @xmath178 , @xmath179 and @xmath195 . since @xmath51 describes the actual helicity-0 degree of freedom of the theory , this field must carry only positive energy excitations , and @xmath196 must be positive . on the other hand , the tensor and scalar degrees of freedom are mixed in the jf , and the positivity of energy does not imply that @xmath197 should always be positive . actually , eq . ( [ positiveenergy ] ) shows that it can become negative when @xmath198 happens to be larger than @xmath199 , which can occur in perfectly regular situations . [ we will see an explicit example in sec . vi.a below . ] this underlines that the parametrization @xmath182 can sometimes be singular : the derivatives of @xmath9 may become purely imaginary although the scalar degree of freedom @xmath51 is well defined . on the other hand , the brans - dicke representation is well behaved ( @xmath200 remains always positive ) , and the positivity of energy simply implies the well - known inequality @xmath201 . actually , the particular value @xmath202 is also singular , as it corresponds to an infinite coupling strength @xmath203 between matter and the helicity-0 degree of freedom @xmath51 . the domain for which the @xmath103 parametrization is pathological although the theory remains consistent simply corresponds to @xmath204 , or @xmath205 . although the perturbations will not be used in sec . vi below , we emphasize that the phenomenological reconstruction of the full microscopic lagrangian can be implemented without any ambiguity if fluctuations are taken into account . for completeness , we review now this part of our program . we assume that both @xmath20 and the matter density perturbation @xmath24 are experimentally determined with enough accuracy , and as in sec . iv.b above , we focus our discussion on the case of a spatially flat frw universe ( @xmath180 ) . we also assume that matter is dustlike ( @xmath206 ) , and the perturbation equations of sec . iv.b are thus simplified . in particular , eq . ( [ conserv_z ] ) reduces to the mere identity @xmath207 . we consider comoving wavelengths @xmath208 much shorter ( for recent times ) than the hubble radius @xmath209 , and also shorter than the inverse mass of the scalar field : @xmath210 two different reasonings can now be used to reach the same conclusions . the first one , explained in ref . @xcite , consists in taking the formal limit @xmath211 in the various perturbation equations . then , the leading terms are either those containing @xmath159 or those multiplied by the large factor @xmath212 . one also needs to consider only the growing adiabatic mode of eq . ( [ fluctphi ] ) , for which @xmath213 . the other reasoning needs a simpler ( but _ a priori _ stronger ) hypothesis . one assumes that the logarithmic time derivative of any quantity , say @xmath214 , is at most of order @xmath49 : @xmath215 suffices to derive straightforwardly all the following approximations . note that both reasonings correspond in fact to the same physical situation of a weakly - coupled light scalar field . in the case of a strongly - coupled but very massive scalar ( see the second paragraph of sec . iii ) , the equations can not be approximated as shown below , and the time evolution of density fluctuations does not follow the same law . for instance , in the particular model considered in ref . @xcite , one always finds a strong clustering of the scalar field at small scales . indeed , this model corresponds to the choice @xmath45 and @xmath127 in action ( [ s_jf ] ) , and eq . ( [ fluctphi ] ) can then be rewritten as @xmath216 . therefore , even if the scalar field is very massive ( @xmath70 large ) , one finds that it is anyway strongly clustered for comoving wavelengths @xmath217 shorter than the inverse mass , _ i.e. _ , in the formal limit @xmath211 . although this is _ a priori _ not forbidden by observations of gravitational clustering , since the inverse mass must be much smaller than the astronomical unit in this model , this is anyway an indication of its probable instability . we will not consider such heavy scalar fields any longer in this paper , and we now come back to the class of weakly - coupled light - scalar models , which are the most natural alternatives to general relativity . setting @xmath218 and making use of ( [ conserv_z ] ) , one can write ( [ conserv_0 ] ) as @xmath219 where the right - hand side is negligible with respect to each separate term of the left - hand side because of the above hypotheses . note that ( [ ddotdeltam ] ) just reproduces the standard evolution equation for matter perturbations . using ( [ fluctphiz1 ] ) , we also arrive at @xmath220 where the second equality is a consequence of eq . ( [ psi ] ) . in the case of gr plus a minimally coupled scalar field , one finds that @xmath221 in the limit @xmath211 , so that the scalar field is not gravitationally clustered at small scales @xcite . this is in agreement with the observational fact that the dark matter described by the @xmath4-term should remain unclustered up to comoving scales @xmath222 mpc ( where we recall that @xmath223 ) . on the other hand , in our scalar - tensor framework , ( [ dphi ] ) shows that the scalar field _ is _ clustered at arbitrarily small scales , but only weakly because the derivative @xmath224 is experimentally known to be small [ see the solar - system constraint ( [ df0 ] ) , and the limit @xmath225 justified in @xcite for redshifts @xmath226 . the class of models we are considering , involving a light scalar field weakly coupled to matter , is thus also in agreement with observations of gravitational clustering . finally , still under the above hypotheses , eq . ( [ fluctmetr ] ) implies @xmath227 remembering the definition ( [ geff ] ) for @xmath91 , and using ( [ dphi ] ) above , eq . ( [ poi ] ) can be recast in a form which exhibits its physical content : @xmath228 poisson s equation is thus simply modified by the substitution of newton s constant @xmath229 by @xmath91 , the effective gravitational constant between two close test masses ! this conclusion was also reached in @xcite , but only for brans - dicke theory with a constant parameter @xmath230 , while we have derived it for an arbitrary ( light ) scalar - tensor theory . as discussed in sec . iii above , expression ( [ geff ] ) is valid only if the distance between the test masses is negligible with respect to the inverse scalar mass . the physical reason why this expression appears in poisson s equation ( [ poi2 ] ) is just that we are working in the short wavelength limit ( [ largek ] ) : the frequency of the waves we are considering is so large that the scalar field behaves as if it were massless . combining ( [ ddotdeltam ] ) with ( [ poi2 ] ) , we now arrive at our final evolution equation for @xmath159 : @xmath231 in terms of the redshift @xmath19 , this reads @xmath232 provided we can extract from observation both physical quantities @xmath20 and @xmath24 with sufficient accuracy , the explicit reconstruction of the microscopic lagrangian is obtained in the following way . starting from ( [ delz ] ) and using the fact that _ today _ @xmath233 and @xmath234 differ by less than @xmath92 , eq . ( [ delz ] ) evaluated at present gives us the cosmological parameter @xmath160 with the same accuracy . then , returning to eq . ( [ delz ] ) for arbitrary @xmath19 , we get @xmath235 , where @xmath236 is a known function of the observables @xmath20 , @xmath24 , and their derivatives . using now eq . ( [ phi ] ) and expression ( [ geff ] ) for @xmath237 , we get a nonlinear second order differential equation for @xmath178 , which can be solved for given @xmath238 and @xmath239 [ one can always set @xmath177 without loss of generality , while @xmath239 is constrained by eq . ( [ df0 ] ) ] . after we have found @xmath178 , we can plug it into ( [ f ] ) to determine @xmath179 in an algebraic way . the final step is explained in the previous subsection , above eq . ( [ phi ] ) , for the various possible parametrizations of action ( [ s_jf ] ) : in the @xmath103 parametrization , @xmath185 is obtained by a simple integration of eq . ( [ phi ] ) , while in the brans - dicke parametrization ( @xmath37 ) , @xmath186 is given algebraically by the same eq . ( [ phi ] ) . this enables us to reconstruct @xmath33 ( or @xmath240 ) and @xmath10 as functions of @xmath241 for that range corresponding to the data . actually , for sufficiently low redshifts @xmath242 , eq . ( [ delz ] ) can be simplified without losing too much accuracy . indeed , as shown in ref . @xcite , the square of the matter - scalar coupling strength @xmath243 , eq . ( [ alpha ] ) , is at most of order @xmath244 for such redshifts . moreover , under natural assumptions , much smaller values of @xmath245 are generically predicted in scalar - tensor theories @xcite . therefore , @xmath91 and @xmath82 differ by less than @xmath101 for redshifts @xmath242 , and eq . ( [ delz ] ) can be used to obtain @xmath246 with the same accuracy . the interest of this simplification is that @xmath178 is now given by an _ algebraic _ equation . in the brans - dicke representation , _ all _ the steps of the reconstruction program are thus algebraic , eq . ( [ f ] ) giving @xmath179 , and eq . ( [ phi ] ) giving @xmath186 . the only non - algebraic step is the final parametric reconstruction of @xmath10 and @xmath240 . let us end this section by a few comments on the observational accuracy which will be needed for this reconstruction program to be implemented . first , eq . ( [ delz ] ) allows to reconstruct @xmath178 only if @xmath247 and @xmath248 are both determined with enough accuracy . moreover , the second derivative of this reconstructed @xmath178 is needed in eq . ( [ f ] ) to obtain @xmath179 . therefore , the actual reconstruction of the potential depends _ a priori _ on the fourth derivative of @xmath24 , so that extremely clean data seem to be necessary . however , the situation is better than this naive derivative counting suggests . indeed , the above estimates for @xmath245 show that @xmath178 does not vary much on the redshift interval @xmath249 . therefore , the first two terms of eq . ( [ f ] ) , involving @xmath250 and @xmath251 , are expected to be negligible with respect to the third one involving @xmath96 . a noisy experimental determination of @xmath252 and @xmath253 is thus not a serious difficulty for our reconstruction program . on the other hand , clean enough data are still needed to determine @xmath178 from eq . ( [ delz ] ) , using @xmath24 and its first two derivatives . before such clean data are available , it will be sufficient to verify that eq . ( [ delz ] ) is consistent with a slowly varying @xmath178 . in the next section , we will show that interesting theoretical constraints can anyway be obtained without knowing at all the density fluctuation @xmath24 , but using only the luminosity distance @xmath11 and consistency arguments within particular subclasses of scalar - tensor models . @xcite , a fit of presently known supernovae events has been performed to obtain the luminosity distance @xmath11 up to redshifts @xmath1 , of course still with large uncertainties . although this is not yet sufficient to constrain seriously scalar - tensor models , we can expect clean data on @xmath11 in the near future from additional supernovae events , and anyway earlier than for the density perturbations @xmath24 . the snap satellite will in particular observe thousands supernovae events up to @xmath12 . in this section , we will concentrate on the theoretical constraints that can be extracted from the knowledge of @xmath11 alone , and therefore of @xmath20 using eq . ( [ hvsdl ] ) . we will thus only use the results of subsection v.a above . since the knowledge of this function does not suffice to fully reconstruct the microscopic lagrangian ( [ s_jf ] ) , we will need additional assumptions on one of the functions it involves , either @xmath96 ( or @xmath124 , depending on the parametrization ) or the potential @xmath192 . one may also assume a functional relation between @xmath96 and @xmath192 ( for instance @xmath254 as in ref . @xcite ) . to emphasize as clearly as possible what kind of constraints can be imposed on scalar - tensor theories , we shall consider the worst situation for them . let us assume that the observed function @xmath20 will be exactly given by eq . ( [ h2 ] ) for @xmath140 , @xmath255 , and @xmath256 : @xmath257 of course , such an observation would _ a priori _ call for the following standard interpretation : gravity is correctly described by general relativity , and we live in a flat universe filled with dustlike matter and a cosmological constant , with corresponding present energy densities ( relative to the critical density ) @xmath160 and @xmath258 . however , for our purpose , eq . ( [ h2gr ] ) should just be considered as kinematical . it tells us how the universe expands with redshift @xmath19 , but we are free to assume that the dynamics of the expansion is governed by a scalar - tensor theory . therefore , @xmath160 and @xmath258 are here mere parameters , whose names refer to their physical significance in the framework of gr . of course , one should not forget that they do not have the same interpretation within scalar - tensor theories . for our numerical applications , we will further take the present estimates based on combined cmb fluctuations and supernovae observations ( they will be determined more accurately by future experiments ) : @xmath259 for these numerical values , ( [ h2gr ] ) is consistent with the presently available luminosity distance @xmath11 up to @xmath1 . actually the best - fit universe , if we assume flatness , gives @xmath260 and @xmath261 . we have chosen to work directly with the exact form ( [ h2gr ] ) , instead of the @xmath11 extracted from observation , in order to clarify the physical content of our results . indeed , the present observational estimates for @xmath11 are still too imprecise to constrain strongly the class of scalar - tensor theories we are considering . moreover , some of our results below depend crucially on the fact that @xmath20 keeps the form ( [ h2gr ] ) up to redshifts @xmath262 , which have not yet been reached experimentally . to relate our results to those obtained in @xcite using fitting functions or an expansion in powers of @xmath19 , one just needs to use eq . ( [ hvsdl ] ) : our exact expression ( [ h2gr ] ) for @xmath20 corresponds to some exact expression for @xmath11 . to summarize , we are assuming in this section that future observations of the luminosity distance @xmath11 will provide a @xmath20 of the form ( [ h2gr ] ) with the numerical values ( [ omegavalues ] ) . this implies notably that our universe is presently accelerating . on the other hand , we are _ not _ assuming that the correct theory of gravity is necessarily gr plus a cosmological constant . the main question that we will address is therefore the following : would such an `` observed '' @xmath20 necessarily rule out the existence of a scalar partner to the graviton ? if not , would it be possible to reproduce ( [ h2gr ] ) within a more natural scalar - tensor theory , in which @xmath258 could be explained by a `` generalized quintessence '' mechanism ? we will first analyze in subsection a the simplest subclass of scalar - tensor theories that we can consider , namely when @xmath263 in action ( [ s_jf ] ) . since this is _ a priori _ the subclass which differs the most from gr plus a cosmological constant , this study will be rather detailed , and it will allow us to underline the mathematical and physical meaning of the constraints that are obtained . subsection b will be again devoted to the case of a massless scalar field , but combined with a cosmological constant . as its conclusions basically confirm those of subsection a , we will present them more concisely . finally , we will briefly discuss in subsection c the cases where one imposes particular forms for the coupling function @xmath96 in action ( [ s_jf ] ) , and one reconstructs the potential @xmath192 from the background equations ( [ f])([phi ] ) . the case of a given functional dependence between @xmath96 and @xmath192 will also be addressed . since a cosmological constant can be interpreted as a particular case of scalar - field potential , it is instructive to analyze whether an observed expansion like ( [ h2gr ] ) could be reproduced in a theory _ without _ any potential , and we now study eqs . ( [ f])([5.5 ] ) for @xmath264 . this case can be analyzed using the second order differential equation ( [ f ] ) for @xmath96 , which simplifies significantly if one introduces a function @xmath214 such that @xmath265 [ as mentioned in sec . v.a above , one can also set @xmath177 without loss of generality . ] then , using the assumed `` experimental '' expression ( [ h2gr ] ) for @xmath20 , and writing ( [ f ] ) in terms of @xmath266 , we get @xmath267 to avoid any confusion , let us recall that @xmath258 ( and the two occurrences of @xmath160 in the left - hand side ) comes from the `` observed '' cosmological function ( [ h2gr ] ) , notwithstanding the fact that there is _ no _ cosmological constant in the model we are considering . the value @xmath160 appearing in the right - hand side stands for the present relative energy density of dustlike matter . we assume that it takes the same numerical value ( [ omegavalues ] ) as in the `` observed '' @xmath20 ( [ h2gr ] ) . equation ( [ eqf ] ) tells us how we should choose @xmath268 to mimic exactly this @xmath20 in the present potential - free theory . in other words , @xmath258 and @xmath160 are two numbers assumed to be given by experiment , and we wish to fit @xmath268 and @xmath169 to satisfy eq . ( [ eqf ] ) . to integrate this second - order differential equation , we need two initial conditions for @xmath214 and its derivative . the first one is an obvious consequence of eq . ( [ smallf ] ) taken at @xmath269 , and we simply get @xmath270 . the second one should be such that the solar - system bound ( [ df0 ] ) is satisfied . for instance , if @xmath271 does not vanish , it is _ sufficient _ to impose @xmath272 , _ i.e. _ , @xmath273 using eq . ( [ smallf ] ) . this corresponds to a scalar - tensor theory which has been attracted towards an extremum of @xmath96 during the cosmological expansion of the universe ( _ cf . _ @xcite ) , so that it is presently strictly indistinguishable from general relativity in solar - system experiments . [ the full allowed domain for @xmath274 will be explored below in a numerical way . ] we consider first our potential - free model in a spatially flat frw universe ( @xmath164 ) . then eq . ( [ eqf ] ) becomes a first - order differential equation for @xmath275 , and its integration yields @xmath276\ , , \label{fprime}\ ] ] where we have set @xmath277 , and where the final constant inside the square brackets has been chosen to impose @xmath273 ( _ i.e. _ , @xmath278 ) . the function @xmath279 can be explicitly written in terms of generalized hypergeometric functions , but its complicated expression will not be useful for our purpose . let us just quote the first order of its expansion in powers of @xmath280 : @xmath281 in conclusion , eq . ( [ eqf ] ) could be integrated analytically , in the particular case of a spatially flat universe . this means that at least in the vicinity of @xmath269 , there _ a priori _ exists a potential - free scalar - tensor theory which exactly mimics general relativity plus a cosmological constant . however , the theory is mathematically consistent only if @xmath178 remains strictly positive . [ if @xmath96 vanishes , then the coupling function @xmath188 , eq . ( [ a ] ) , between matter and the helicity-0 degree of freedom @xmath51 diverges , and if @xmath96 becomes negative , the graviton carries negative energy . ] let us thus compute the value @xmath282 for which @xmath283 , or @xmath284 , vanishes for the first time . because of the complexity of the solution @xmath214 , we did not find a close analytical expression for @xmath282 , but its expansion in powers of @xmath280 can be obtained straightforwardly : @xmath285 { \omega_{m,0}^2\over\omega_{\lambda,0}^2 } + o\left({\omega_{m,0}^3\over\omega_{\lambda,0}^3}\right ) . \label{zmax}\ ] ] numerically , for the values ( [ omegavalues ] ) of @xmath258 and @xmath160 , we find @xmath286 . in conclusion , this scalar - tensor model is able to mimic general relativity plus a cosmological constant , but only on the small interval @xmath287 . if future observations of type ia supernovae give a behavior of @xmath20 of the form ( [ h2gr ] ) on a larger interval , say up to @xmath1 , then the present scalar - tensor theory will be ruled out . this example of a vanishing potential illustrates a conclusion that we will reobtain below for more general theories : the determination of the form of @xmath20 over some ( even rather small ) redshift interval is in fact more constraining than the precise value of the parameters @xmath288 themselves . indeed , eq . ( [ zmax ] ) clearly shows that @xmath282 can not exceed 1 even in the presumably unrealistic case of @xmath289 . [ a calculation using the exact expression for @xmath268 shows that @xmath290 would exceed 1 only for @xmath291 . ] note that all the results obtained are independent of the parameter @xmath5 . one could try to increase @xmath282 by considering a spatially curved frw universe . we did not solve eq . ( [ eqf ] ) in the most general case , but since we wish to compute the corrections to eq . ( [ zmax ] ) due to a small value of @xmath292 , it is sufficient to work at zeroth order in @xmath280 . let us thus set @xmath293 in eq . ( [ eqf ] ) , which reduces to @xmath294 its solution is obviously a sine if @xmath295 ( _ i.e. _ , @xmath296 , closed universe ) , or a hyperbolic sine for @xmath297 ( _ i.e. _ , @xmath106 , open universe ) . taking into account the initial conditions @xmath270 and @xmath298 , we thus get @xmath299 [ fok0 ] the first zero of @xmath300 is then reached either at @xmath301 or at @xmath302 . in both cases , the expansion in powers of @xmath303 gives @xmath304 . working perturbatively , one can also compute the correction to this expression due to the nonzero value of @xmath160 , and one finds that @xmath282 is given by eq . ( [ zmax ] ) above plus the following correction : @xmath305 { \omega_{\kappa,0}\over\omega_{\lambda,0 } } + o\left({\omega_{\kappa,0}^2\over\omega_{\lambda,0}^2}\right)\ , . \label{deltazmax}\ ] ] in conclusion , @xmath282 can be slightly enlarged if we consider our potential - free scalar - tensor theory in an open frw universe ( @xmath297 ) . numerically , for the values ( [ omegavalues ] ) of @xmath258 and @xmath160 , we find @xmath306 . since the latest experimental data on cmb temperature fluctuations already constrain @xmath165 to be small ( see the latest boomerang and maxima data ) , and actually an open universe is unlikely while a marginally closed universe is still acceptable , we thus recover the same qualitative conclusion as in the spatially flat case : it is possible to mimic general relativity plus a cosmological constant within a potential - free scalar - tensor theory only on a small redshift interval @xmath307 . the above conclusions have been confirmed by numerical integrations of eqs . ( [ f])([5.5 ] ) , still assuming a hubble diagram consistent with ( [ h2gr ] ) . instead of considering only theories which are presently indistinguishable from general relativity ( @xmath278 ) , we imposed arbitrary initial conditions for @xmath250 , and computed the corresponding value of the present scalar - matter coupling strength @xmath308 , eq . ( [ alpha ] ) . in the case of a spatially flat frw universe , we recovered that the solar - system bound ( [ df0 ] ) imposes the limit @xmath309 , consistently with the above analytical estimate ( [ zmax ] ) . in other words , the constraint ( [ df0 ] ) is so tight that even taking the largest allowed value for @xmath310 does not change significantly @xmath282 . figure 1 displays the reconstructed @xmath178 for this maximal @xmath310 , and one can note that its slope at @xmath167 is visually indistinguishable from the horizontal . this figure also plots the einstein - frame scalar @xmath51 , eq . ( [ varphi ] ) , which is the actual helicity-0 degree of freedom of the theory . notice that it diverges at @xmath282 , so that the theory loses its consistency beyond this value of the redshift . curiously , we found that even if no experimental constraint like ( [ df0 ] ) is imposed on @xmath310 ( _ i.e. _ , even if we forget that solar - system experiments confirm very well general relativity ) , then the mathematical consistency of the theory anyway imposes @xmath311 . in fact , eq . ( [ f ] ) alone can be solved for arbitrary large values of @xmath19 , _ i.e. _ , there exist initial values of @xmath239 such that @xmath178 remains positive for any @xmath19 . however , the values of @xmath239 needed to integrate eq . ( [ f ] ) beyond @xmath312 correspond to negative values of @xmath313 ( where @xmath314 denotes the present value of the brans - dicke parameter ) . in other words , the expression of @xmath196 given by eq . ( [ 5.5 ] ) would become negative around @xmath167 , and the helicity-0 degree of freedom would thus need to carry negative energy at least on a finite interval of @xmath19 , if one wished to integrate eqs . ( [ f])([5.5 ] ) beyond @xmath315 . figure 2 displays the maximum redshift @xmath282 consistent with the positivity of energy of both the graviton and the scalar field , but for any value of the present matter - scalar coupling strength @xmath310 . as underlined above , one finds that @xmath290 can never be larger than @xmath316 . this figure also indicates the present solar system bound on @xmath310 , corresponding to @xmath309 as in fig . 1 . the limiting case of a vanishing @xmath310 , _ i.e. _ , of a scalar - tensor theory which is presently _ strictly _ indistinguishable from gr in the solar system , corresponds to @xmath286 , as was derived analytically in eq . ( [ zmax ] ) . figure 2 also indicates the range of values for @xmath310 that are generically obtained in refs . @xcite while studying the cosmological evolution of scalar - tensor theories at earlier epochs in the matter - dominated era : the theory is attracted towards a maximum of @xmath96 ( _ i.e. _ , a minimum of @xmath317 ) so that the present value of @xmath310 is expected to be extremely small . finally , this figure also displays the maximum value of @xmath310 for which the parametrization @xmath318 of action ( [ s_jf ] ) has a meaning . beyond @xmath319 ( _ i.e. _ , for a brans - dicke parameter @xmath320 ) , one would get @xmath321 in this parametrization . in other words , eqs . ( [ f])([phi ] ) can not be integrated consistently beyond @xmath322 if one sets @xmath39 , whereas the brans - dicke or the einstein - frame representations show that the theory can be mathematically consistent up to @xmath323 ( @xmath199 remains positive ) . this underlines that the @xmath103 parametrization may be sometimes pathological . our numerical integration of eq . ( [ varphiprime ] ) not only allowed us to check the positivity of the scalar field energy , but also to reconstruct parametrically the matter - scalar coupling function @xmath188 . since @xmath324 , eq . ( [ a ] ) , we know that @xmath325 is finite and strictly positive over the interval @xmath326 , but we also checked that it is single valued over this interval . this means that if @xmath195 can take several times the same value for different @xmath19 , they must correspond also to the same value of @xmath325 . actually , since eq . ( [ varphiprime ] ) does not fix the sign of @xmath327 , one should keep in mind that @xmath51 can oscillate around a constant value @xmath328 . if the numerical integration confuses the two points @xmath329 , but if @xmath188 happens not to be symmetrical around @xmath328 , it may look like a bi - valued function . when such a situation occurred in our programs , we always verified that a single - valued @xmath188 could be defined consistently by unfolding it around the oscillation points of @xmath51 . figure 3 illustrates such a situation , for an intentionally unrealistic value of @xmath310 in order to clarify the plots . [ the value @xmath330 is inconsistent with the solar - system bound ( [ df0 ] ) , but it corresponds anyway to a mathematically consistent theory , although the @xmath103 parametrization can not be used in this case . ] all the functions @xmath317 that we reconstructed have similar convex parabolic shapes . this is consistent with the results of refs . @xcite , showing that the scalar field is generically attracted towards a minimum of @xmath317 during the expansion of the universe . if we had found models such that the present epoch ( @xmath167 ) is close to a _ maximum _ of @xmath331 , this would have meant that the theory is unstable , and that we have extremely fine tuned it to be consistent with solar - system constraints . on the contrary , the convex functions @xmath317 that we obtained show that these scalar - tensor models are cosmologically stable , _ i.e. _ , that the tight bounds ( [ df0 ] ) are in fact natural consequences of the attractor mechanism described in @xcite . we have checked that reducing the parameter @xmath258 allows us to extend the integration region in the past , consistently with the above analytical results . for instance , when we vary @xmath258 , still satisfying @xmath332 and setting @xmath164 , we find that @xmath333 is required in order to integrate the equations up to a redshift @xmath334 . this would correspond to @xmath335 , _ i.e. _ , 100 times larger than present estimates . we also added random noise to our assumed @xmath20 , eq . ( [ h2gr ] ) , and verified that the conclusions are not changed qualitatively provided @xmath20 is known over a wide enough redshift interval . this means that the experimental determination of the luminosity distance @xmath11 needs not be very precise to be quite constraining , provided redshifts of order @xmath262 are probed . as an illustration , let us take the exact expression @xmath20 of eqs . ( [ h2gr])([omegavalues ] ) for discrete values of the redshift , say @xmath336 , and let us add or subtract randomly between @xmath76 and @xmath337 to the corresponding @xmath20 . then , we may fit a polynomial through these `` noisy '' values of @xmath20 , and use our numerical programs to integrate the background equations ( [ f])([5.5 ] ) and reconstruct @xmath96 . we found that there always exists a maximum redshift beyond which @xmath96 is negative ( and the theory thus inconsistent ) . figure 4 displays the two extreme values of @xmath282 that we obtained with hundreds of such `` deformed '' @xmath20 : it is sometimes even smaller than for the `` exact '' @xmath20 of eq . ( [ h2gr ] ) , and sometimes larger but never greater that @xmath338 . it should be noted that for the @xmath337 noise we chose , the @xmath20 of pure gr with a vanishing cosmological constant could have been obtained . in that case , a potential - free scalar - tensor model with @xmath339 would of course have fitted perfectly this @xmath20 up to @xmath340 . the reason why we never managed to go beyond @xmath341 is that we considered _ random noise _ , instead of such a precise _ bias _ of our assumed function @xmath20 , eq . ( [ h2gr ] ) . we are aware that our deformed functions of fig . 4 do not reproduce a realistic experimental noise . however , they illustrate in a well defined way that an inaccurate determination of @xmath20 over a wide redshift interval is actually more constraining than a precise measurement over a small redshift interval only . the conclusion of the present subsection is therefore that a scalar - tensor theory without potential can accommodate a hubble diagram consistent with ( [ h2gr ] ) , but only on a small redshift interval if @xmath258 is significant . the experimental determination of the luminosity distance @xmath11 , either accurately for @xmath242 or even with large ( tens of percents ) uncertainties up to redshifts @xmath262 , severely constrains this subclass of theories . future observations should thus be able to distinguish them from general relativity , and to confirm or rule them out without any ambiguity . it is worth noting that such future determinations of @xmath11 would _ a priori _ be much more constraining than solar - system experiments and binary pulsars tests . indeed , although the precision of the latter is quite impressive ( see e.g. @xcite ) , they anyway probe only the first two derivatives of @xmath317 , eqs . ( [ df0])-([beta0 ] ) , whereas cosmological observations should give access to the full shape of this function . let us also recall that the constraints we found crucially depend on the fact that the theory should contain only positive - energy excitations to be consistent , and notably that the function @xmath96 should remain always strictly positive . we did not use any other cosmological observation , but obviously , once the microscopic lagrangian of a scalar - tensor theory has been reconstructed using @xmath11 , all its other cosmological predictions should also be checked . for instance , a bound @xmath342 is given in ref . @xcite for the value of the function @xmath96 at nucleosynthesis time . are shown to be consistent with the observed abundances of light elements , provided @xmath343 is large enough , where @xmath188 is the matter - scalar coupling function ( [ a ] ) . ] if one assumes that @xmath178 is monotonic , the reconstructed function of fig . 1 would not be consistent with this nucleosynthesis bound beyond @xmath344 . this would be even more constraining than the bound @xmath345 we obtained just from mathematical consistency requirements . alternatively , a reconstructed function @xmath178 like the one of fig . 1 would be consistent with the above nucleosynthesis bound only if it were non - monotonic beyond @xmath346 . although this would not be forbidden from a purely phenomenological point of view , this would be anyway unnatural , and more difficult to justify theoretically . to confirm the results of the previous subsection , let us now consider the case of a massless scalar field together with a cosmological constant whose value _ differs _ from the one entering our assumed @xmath20 , eq . ( [ h2gr])-([omegavalues ] ) . the question that we wish to address is the following : can _ part of _ the observed @xmath258 be due to the presence of a massless scalar field ? to impose a cosmological constant in a scalar - tensor theory , one would naively choose a constant potential @xmath10 in action ( [ s_jf ] ) . however , as shown by eq . ( [ v ] ) , the corresponding potential @xmath130 of the helicity-0 degree of freedom @xmath51 would not be constant in this case ( because @xmath33 is _ a priori _ varying ) , and its second derivative would give generically a nonvanishing scalar mass . to avoid any scalar self - interaction , and in particular to set its mass to @xmath76 , one needs in fact to impose @xmath347 in the einstein - frame action ( [ s_ef ] ) . this defines a consistent cosmological `` constant '' in a massless scalar - tensor theory . note that the corresponding jordan - frame potential @xmath10 is then proportional to @xmath348 , and therefore that it does not correspond to the usual notion of cosmological _ constant _ in action ( [ s_jf ] ) . since our assumed `` observed '' @xmath20 involves a parameter denoted @xmath258 , eqs . ( [ h2gr])-([omegavalues ] ) , let us introduce a different notation for the contribution due to the constant potential @xmath349 : @xmath350 it is easily checked that for @xmath351 , the solution @xmath352 ( or @xmath353 ) is recovered , _ i.e. _ , a scalar field minimally coupled to gravity with a constant potential acting like a cosmological constant . indeed , in terms of the function @xmath268 defined in ( [ smallf ] ) , eq . ( [ f ] ) reads @xmath354 note that this is now a _ non_-linear equation in @xmath96 , contrary to eq . ( [ eqf ] ) above for the case of a vanishing potential . if @xmath351 , one finds that @xmath355 is an obvious solution , _ i.e. _ , @xmath356 a constant scalar field @xmath9 ( or @xmath51 ) then satisfies eqs . ( [ phi])([varphiprimebis ] ) . if we now consider a scalar - tensor theory for which @xmath357 differs from the `` observed '' @xmath358 , we find that like in the previous subsection , there exists a maximum redshift @xmath282 beyond which @xmath178 becomes negative , and therefore beyond which the theory loses its mathematical consistency . figure 5 displays this maximum redshift as a function of @xmath357 . we plot this figure for the initial condition @xmath278 ( _ i.e. _ , for a theory which is presently indistinguishable from gr in the solar system ) , but as before , we verified that the curve is almost identical if one takes the maximum value of @xmath359 consistent with the solar - system bound ( [ df0 ] ) . we also assume @xmath164 ( spatially flat universe ) for this figure , as we know from the previous discussion that a value even as large as @xmath360 does not change qualitatively the results . for @xmath361 , we recover the result @xmath362 derived above for a vanishing potential . when @xmath363 , @xmath282 becomes even smaller . as expected , this is worse than in the potential - free case . on the contrary , when @xmath357 is positive ( _ i.e. _ , when it contributes positively to part of the `` observed '' @xmath258 ) , the maximum redshift @xmath282 increases . this is just due to the fact that our massless scalar field needs to mimic a smaller fraction of the `` observed '' @xmath258 , so that the theory can remain consistent over a wider redshift interval . however , we find that @xmath282 is still smaller than @xmath364 for @xmath365 , and a @xmath20 of the form ( [ h2gr])-([omegavalues ] ) observed up to @xmath262 would thus suffice to rule out the model . if such a @xmath20 could be confirmed up to @xmath14 , one would need @xmath366 for our massless scalar - tensor theory to fit it ! even so , the theory would anyway become pathological at slightly higher redshifts . in conclusion , a massless scalar _ can not _ account for a significant part of the observed cosmological constant if @xmath20 is experimentally found to be of the form ( [ h2gr ] ) over a wide redshift interval . let us note finally that for @xmath367 , eq . ( [ eqfvconst ] ) does admit strictly positive solutions for @xmath214 ( or @xmath96 ) up to arbitrarily large redshifts . this ensures that the graviton energy is always positive . however , it is now the scalar field which needs to carry negative energy . indeed , eq . ( [ varphiprimebis ] ) gives a negative value for @xmath199 , basically because of the presence of the large negative number @xmath368 in this equation . [ in the @xmath318 parametrization , @xmath200 is obviously also negative , because of eq . ( [ positiveenergy ] ) , or directly from eq . ( [ phibis ] ) which also involves a @xmath368 term . ] therefore , there is only one possibility for a consistent massless scalar - tensor theory to reproduce ( [ h2gr ] ) over a wide redshift interval : it must involve a cosmological constant , whose contribution @xmath357 is equal to ( or very slightly smaller than ) the parameter @xmath258 entering ( [ h2gr ] ) . in other words , the theory should be extremely close to gr plus a cosmological constant , and the massless scalar field must have a negligible contribution . this illustrates again the main conclusion of our paper : the experimental determination of the luminosity distance @xmath11 over a wide redshift interval , up to @xmath262 , will suffice to rule out ( or confirm ) the existence of a massless scalar partner to the graviton . in the previous two subsections , the matter - scalar coupling function @xmath33 ( or @xmath188 ) was reconstructed from the assumed knowledge of @xmath20 , for theories whose potential @xmath10 ( or @xmath130 ) had a given form . we now consider the inverse problem . we still assume that future observations will provide a hubble diagram consistent with ( [ h2gr])-([omegavalues ] ) , but we wish now to reconstruct the scalar - field potential @xmath192 for given forms of the coupling function @xmath96 . we first consider a generic two - parameter family of scalar - tensor theories , which has already been studied in great detail for solar - system , binary - pulsar and gravity - wave experiments @xcite , as well as for cosmology starting with the matter - dominated era @xcite and even back to nucleosynthesis @xcite . its definition is simplified if we work in the einstein frame ( [ 2.4])-([s_ef ] ) . the matter - scalar coupling function is simply given by @xmath369 in which the present value of the scalar field , @xmath194 , may be chosen to vanish without loss of generality . any analytical function @xmath317 may be expanded in such a way , but we here assume that no higher power of @xmath51 appears , _ i.e. _ , that @xmath370 is strictly parabolic : it depends only on the two parameters @xmath308 and @xmath371 . the latter is a simplified notation for @xmath77 , and should not be confused with the post - newtonian parameter @xmath372 defined in ( [ betappn ] ) . [ actually , this equation shows that @xmath373 . ] solar - system experiments impose @xmath374 , eq . ( [ df0 ] ) , while binary pulsars give @xmath375 , eq . ( [ beta0 ] ) , for this class of theories . we first study these models for the case of a spatially flat universe ( @xmath164 ) . as shown by eq . ( [ kg ] ) , a constant scalar field @xmath376 may be a solution if @xmath377 ( so that @xmath378 vanishes too ) and if the potential @xmath130 is also constant . our assumed @xmath20 , eqs . ( [ h2gr])-([omegavalues ] ) , can thus always be reproduced if the parameter @xmath308 vanishes identically , and the reconstructed potential merely reduces to the constant @xmath379 . this corresponds simply to gr plus a cosmological constant , and the massless scalar degree of freedom @xmath51 remains unexcited , frozen at an extremum of the parabola ( [ generica ] ) . actually , eq . ( [ kg ] ) shows that this extremum corresponds to a stable situation only if it is a minimum , _ i.e. _ , if @xmath380 in ( [ generica ] ) . this is consistent with the results of refs . @xcite : if the theory involves a cosmological constant whose value equals the `` observed '' one in eqs . ( [ h2gr])-([omegavalues ] ) , a massless scalar field is cosmologically attracted towards a minimum of the coupling function @xmath317 , and the present value of its slope , @xmath308 , is expected to be generically very small . on the other hand , if @xmath308 is _ not _ assumed to vanish , say if its value is comparable to the solar - system bound ( [ df0 ] ) , then our reconstruction of the potential @xmath130 from eqs . ( [ f])([5.5 ] ) leads to serious difficulties . their nature depends on the magnitude of the curvature parameter @xmath371 of parabola ( [ generica ] ) . string - inspired models @xcite suggest that @xmath371 may be as large as 10 , or even 40 . with such large values ( and assuming non - vanishing @xmath308 ) , our numerical integrations of eqs . ( [ f])([5.5 ] ) give concave potentials @xmath130 , unbounded from below . this corresponds to unstable theories , and thereby to extremely fine - tuned initial conditions : changing slightly the derivative of the scalar field , @xmath327 , at high redshifts would _ a priori _ yield a totally different universe at present . this result tells us that this kind of models can not be consistent over a wide redshift interval with the exact form of @xmath20 we chose in ( [ h2gr ] ) , unless the parameter @xmath308 is extremely small . actually , this is just another way to present the results of refs . @xcite : since they predict that @xmath308 should be almost vanishing at present , assuming a significant non - zero value implies that the theory is unnatural . to obtain convex - shaped potentials @xmath130 ( _ i.e. _ , stable theories ) while still assuming a non - vanishing @xmath308 , we typically need values of @xmath381 . however , the reconstructed potentials always exhibit sudden changes of their slope . basically , they reproduce a cosmological constant over a finite interval around @xmath194 ( _ i.e. _ , around @xmath269 ) , and become rapidly divergent beyond a critical value of the scalar field ( depending on @xmath371 ) . therefore , as in subsection vi.b above , we find that such scalar - tensor models can reproduce ( [ h2gr ] ) only if they involve a cosmological constant , whose energy contribution is close to the parameter @xmath258 entering @xmath20 , and if the scalar field has a negligible enough influence . in other words , such models would not explain the small but nonzero value of the observed cosmological constant by a `` quintessence '' mechanism , and would not be more natural than merely assuming the existence of @xmath4 . the above results are significantly changed if we take into account the possible spatial curvature of the universe . indeed , smoother potentials @xmath130 are obtained for closed universes ( @xmath295 ) , and the present value of the cosmological constant thus becomes more `` natural '' . to illustrate this feature , let us consider the case of a minimally coupled scalar field ( as in @xcite ) , corresponding to @xmath382 in eq . ( [ generica ] ) . for an open universe ( @xmath297 ) , we find from eq . ( [ 5.5 ] ) that the scalar field would need to carry negative energy to reproduce ( [ h2gr ] ) . on the other hand , for a closed universe ( @xmath295 ) , one can derive analytically the parametric form of the potential @xmath130 . it can be expressed in terms of the hypergeometric function @xmath383 ( solution of the differential equation @xmath384{\cal f } ' - ab { \cal f } = 0 $ ] ) : @xmath385 [ parametricv ] where as before @xmath386 . if @xmath165 is very small , we recover that @xmath130 exhibits a sudden change of slope , as was obtained above in the flat case . this is illustrated by the left panel of fig . 6 . on the contrary , if @xmath165 is large enough , the same analytical expression ( [ parametricv ] ) gives nice regular potentials , like the one displayed in the right panel of fig . this reconstructed @xmath130 , as well as those obtained numerically for weakly varying @xmath317 , eq . ( [ generica ] ) , are natural in the sense that they can be approximated by the exponential of simple polynomials in @xmath51 . in that case , the observed value of the cosmological constant does not appear as a mere parameter introduced by hand in the lagrangian , but corresponds basically to the present value of @xmath387 . it should be noted that a value as large as @xmath388 is not excluded by the latest boomerang data , though it would be problematic in the framework of the inflationary paradigm . in conclusion , the existence of non - singular solutions over a long period of time is again the constraining input . a non - minimally coupled scalar field is essentially incompatible with ( [ h2gr ] ) over a wide redshift interval , unless the scalar field is frozen at a minimum of @xmath317 ( consistently with @xcite ) . if future experiments provide a hubble diagram in accordance with ( [ h2gr ] ) and also give a very small value for @xmath169 , it will be possible to conclude that scalar - tensor theories ( either non - minimally or minimally coupled ) _ can not _ explain in a natural way the existence of a cosmological constant . on the other hand , if the universe is closed and @xmath165 large enough , a `` quintessence '' mechanism in a scalar - tensor theory seems more natural than a mere cosmological constant . the above conclusions can be confirmed by starting from a given @xmath178 ( or @xmath325 ) , rather than @xmath33 ( or @xmath188 ) . we consider here `` scaling solutions '' , _ i.e. _ , we assume that these functions behave as some power of the scale factor @xmath389 . one may for instance write @xmath390 , with @xmath391 . as before , our aim is to reconstruct a regular potential @xmath130 from the knowledge of @xmath20 , assumed to be of the form ( [ h2gr])-([omegavalues ] ) . the strongest constraint on this class of theories is imposed by the solar - system bound ( [ df0 ] ) . indeed , using the definition ( [ alpha ] ) for @xmath136 , one can also write it as @xmath392 , and eq . ( [ 5.5 ] ) evaluated at @xmath167 then yields the following second - order equation for @xmath393 : @xmath394 note that this equation does not depend on the full form of eq . ( [ h2gr ] ) , but only on its first derivative at @xmath269 , _ i.e. _ , on the deceleration parameter @xmath395 . the constraints on @xmath393 derived below are thus valid as soon as @xmath396 is of order @xmath397 , consistently with the estimated value ( 6.2 ) for @xmath160 . in the case of a spatially flat universe ( @xmath164 ) , ( [ eq.p ] ) gives immediately @xmath398 , so that the solar - system bound ( [ df0 ] ) imposes @xmath399 . therefore , the scalar field needs to be almost minimally coupled . if @xmath393 vanishes identically , we recover as before the trivial solution of gr plus a cosmological constant , together with an unexcited minimally - coupled scalar field . on the other hand , if @xmath393 does not vanish , one finds that the scalar field needs to carry negative energy beyond @xmath400 . even without trying to reconstruct the potential @xmath130 , one can thus conclude that such scaling solutions would be ruled out by the observation of a @xmath20 of the form ( [ h2gr ] ) up to @xmath262 . paradoxically , this result is valid even for an infinitesimal ( but nonzero ) value of @xmath393 . indeed , there exists a discontinuity between the case of a strictly constant @xmath96 and that of a scaling solution @xmath401 . at first order in @xmath393 , and still assuming @xmath164 , one can write eq . ( [ 5.5 ] ) as @xmath402 this equation confirms that @xmath403 when @xmath404 , and therefore that the scalar field tends towards a constant in this limit . however , it carries positive energy ( @xmath405 ) only if @xmath406 since the right - hand side is estimated to be @xmath407 , the maximum value of @xmath19 is obtained for @xmath408 , so that the large numerical factor coming from @xmath409 in the left - hand side is compensated by the small term inside the second parentheses . working iteratively , this maximum redshift can be better approximated by @xmath410 , and the actual numerical resolution of equality ( [ psmallpositivee ] ) for the values ( [ omegavalues ] ) gives @xmath411 . therefore , even if @xmath393 is vanishingly small , a scaling solution @xmath401 can not be consistent with ( [ h2gr ] ) beyond this maximum redshift . this illustrates once more that the experimental determination of @xmath20 up to @xmath262 would be more constraining that solar - system experiments for this class of theories , provided one takes into account the requirement of positive energy . let us underline that the above value for @xmath282 is valid for a monomial @xmath412 but not for more complicated polynomial expressions . indeed , as shown for instance in sec . vi.b above , there do exist scalar - tensor theories consistent with ( [ h2gr ] ) up to arbitrarily large redshifts , and they do not need to be _ strictly _ equivalent to gr plus a cosmological constant ( although they must be close enough to it ) . moreover , the above maximum redshift is a consequence of the _ exact _ form for @xmath20 we chose in eq . ( [ h2gr ] ) . a slightly different function may of course allow a positive - energy scalar field up to much higher redshifts . it suffices that the right - hand side of eq . ( [ varphiprime ] ) be strictly positive for @xmath413 , and the case of a closed universe discussed below provides an example , since the contribution @xmath414 is then positive in eq . ( [ varphiprime ] ) . the case of a spatially open universe ( @xmath297 ) is forbidden by eq . ( [ eq.p ] ) , unless @xmath169 is smaller than @xmath415 . such a situation would be indistinguishable from the spatially flat case . in a spatially closed universe ( @xmath295 ) , @xmath393 is given by the positive root of the second - order equation eq . ( [ eq.p ] ) . remembering the solar - system bound ( [ df0 ] ) , one may consider the case @xmath416 , and one gets @xmath417 . even if one considered values of @xmath169 as large as @xmath418 , this would limit @xmath393 to @xmath419 . therefore , in this case again , solar - system constraints impose that the scalar field should be almost minimally coupled , if one looks for such scaling solutions . the difference with the spatially flat case is that eqs . ( [ f])([varphiprimebis ] ) can now be integrated for any redshift @xmath19 ( from future infinity , @xmath420 , to arbitrarily large @xmath19 ) . since @xmath178 needs to be almost constant , we recover solution ( [ parametricv ] ) for the potential @xmath130 . as in sec . vi.c.1 above , we can thus conclude that such models would be consistent with ( [ h2gr ] ) over a wide redshift interval only if they are ( almost ) minimally coupled , and they would provide a natural `` quintessence '' mechanism to explain the presently observed cosmological constant only if the universe is ( marginally ) closed . let us end this paragraph by a remark concerning scaling solutions , for which the scalar - field energy density scales like a power of @xmath389 . as mentioned in the introduction , they have attracted a lot of attention recently . for a minimally coupled field , the possible scaling behaviors and the corresponding potentials can be classified @xcite . as for a non - minimally coupled field , a subclass of theories was considered in @xcite , for which @xmath421 where @xmath422 and @xmath423 are constants . since , besides these two constants , there is only one unknown function of @xmath9 , the knowledge of @xmath20 suffices to reconstruct the full microscopic lagrangian from eqs . ( [ f])([5.5 ] ) above . however , the main conclusion of ref . @xcite can be recovered from a simple argument , without any numerical integration . indeed , it was shown in this reference that there exists a universal behavior of these theories , depending on @xmath423 but not on the precise shape of @xmath33 . as emphasized in @xcite , this result was obtained in the strong coupling limit , corresponding formally to @xmath424 in action ( [ s_jf ] ) . taking into account the assumed relation ( [ ufm ] ) , the class of theories under consideration is thus defined by @xmath425\ . \label{s_jfz0}\ ] ] if we now introduce a new scalar variable @xmath426 , we notice that @xmath9 disappears totally from the action . no physical result can thus depend on the precise form of @xmath33 , and we recover the conclusion of @xcite . the constant @xmath422 may also be set to 1 by a change of length units , and this class of theories is thus parametrized by the single real number @xmath423 . any physical prediction must therefore depend only on @xmath423 . in this work we have investigated the constraints that arise from the _ experimental _ knowledge of the luminosity distance in function of the redshift up to @xmath262 , corresponding to @xmath20 given by ( [ h2gr])-([omegavalues ] ) . in particular , our universe is then presently accelerating and we have studied the viability of subclasses of scalar - tensor theories of gravity . we have shown that the subclass of models in which the scalar partner @xmath9 of the graviton has no potential at all , and which satisfy the present - day existing constraints , are inevitably ruled out if an expansion of the form of eq . ( [ h2gr ] ) holds even for a redshift interval as tiny as @xmath427 ( see the precise numbers in section vi ) . we see that these theories become pathological in the form of a vanishing @xmath96 , already at such low redshifts for which @xmath20 will be experimentally accessible in the near future @xcite . hence we show that a cosmological observation of the background evolution according to eq . ( [ h2gr ] ) in the `` recent '' epoch will be enough to rule out such models . [ on the other hand , future observations might provide a @xmath20 which confirms the existence of a scalar partner to the graviton and rule out pure gr ! ] the main reason why we obtained so constraining results is that we took into account the mathematical consistency of the theory , _ i.e. _ , the fact that it should contain only positive - energy excitations to be well behaved . this requirement severely restricts the class of viable models . a non - flat universe can alleviate in some cases the tight constraints we found . however , the latest cmb data released by boomerang and maxima @xcite favor a flat universe ( in accordance with the inflationary paradigm ) , and only a marginally closed universe is still allowed by the location of the first acoustic ( doppler ) peak at @xmath428 , while an open universe is more unlikely . the most impressive conclusion is that future cosmological observations may prove to be more constraining for massless scalar - tensor theories than solar - system and binary - pulsar tests . indeed , even if the determination of the luminosity distance @xmath11 will not reach very quickly the impressive accuracy obtained in the solar system or with binary pulsars , it will nevertheless give access to the full coupling function @xmath33 in action ( [ s_jf ] ) , or @xmath188 in the einstein - frame rewriting ( [ s_ef ] ) , whereas only its first two derivatives are presently probed . we thank our collaborators a. starobinsky and b. boisseau for discussions . one of us ( gef ) also wishes to thank a. riazuelo for informative discussions . centre de physique thorique is unit propre de recherche 7061 . s. perlmutter , g. aldering , m. della valle _ _ , nature * 391 * , 51 ( 1998 ) ; s. perlmutter , g. aldering , g. goldhaber _ et al . _ , astroph . j. , * 517 * , 565 ( 1999 ) . p.m. garnavich , r.p . kirshner , p. challis _ et al . _ , astrophys . j. lett . * 493 * , l53 ( 1998 ) ; a.g . riess , a.v . philipenko , p. challis _ et al . . j. * 116 * , 1009 ( 1998 ) . bernardis _ et al . _ , nature * 404 * , 955 ( 2000 ) . s. hanany _ et al . _ , astro - ph/0005123 ; a. balbi _ et al . _ , astro - ph/0005124 . bahcall , j.p . ostriker , s. perlmutter , and p.j . steinhardt , science , * 284 * , 1481 ( 1999 ) . v. sahni and a.a . starobinsky , ijmpd , to appear ( 2000 ) ; astro - ph/9904398 . m. chevallier and d. polarski , submitted , gr - qc/0009008 r.r . caldwell , r. dave , and p.j . steinhardt , phys . rev . lett . * 80 * , 1582 ( 1998 ) . b. ratra and p.j.e . peebles , phys . d * 37 * , 3406 ( 1988 ) . ferreira and m. joyce , phys . d * 58 * , 023503 ( 1998 ) ; phys . * 79 * , 4740 ( 1998 ) . i. zlatev , l. wang and p.j . steinhardt , phys . lett . * 82 * , 896 ( 1999 ) . a.d . liddle and r.j . scherrer , phys . rev . d * 59 * , 0223509 , ( 1998 ) . c. kolda and d.h . lyth , phys . b * 458 * , 197 ( 1999 ) . starobinsky , jetp lett . * 68 * , 757 ( 1998 ) ; gravit . & cosmol . * 4 * ( suppl . ) , 88 ( 1998 ) . d. huterer and m.s . turner , phys . d * 60 * , 081301 ( 1999 ) ; t. nakamura and t. chiba , mon . not . ast . soc . * 306 * , 696 ( 1999 ) . saini , s. raychaudhury , v. sahni , and a.a . starobinsky , astro - ph/9910231 . caldwell , astro - ph/9908168 . will , _ theory and experiment in gravitational physics _ , ( cambridge university press , cambridge , england , 1993 ) . t. damour and g. esposito - farse , class . * 9 * , 2093 ( 1992 ) . t. damour and g. esposito - farse , phys . d * 53 * , 5541 ( 1996 ) . t. damour and g. esposito - farse , phys . d * 54 * , 1474 ( 1996 ) . . will , phys . d * 50 * , 6058 ( 1994 ) . t. damour and g. esposito - farse , phys . d * 58 * , 042001 ( 1998 ) . m. gasperini and g. veneziano , astropart . phys . * 1 * ( 1993 ) 317 ; mod . phys . lett . a*8 * ( 1993 ) 3701 . t. damour and k. nordtvedt , phys . lett . * 70 * , 2217 ( 1993 ) ; phys . d * 48 * , 3436 ( 1993 ) . d.i . santiago , d. kalligas , and r.v . wagoner , phys . d * 58 * , 124005 ( 1998 ) . t. damour and b. pichon , phys . d * 59 * , 123502 ( 1999 ) . a. navarro , a. serna , and j.m . alimi , phys . d * 59 * , 124015 ( 1999 ) . uzan , phys . d * 59 * , 123510 ( 1999 ) . t. chiba , phys . d * 60 * , 083508 ( 1999 ) . x. chen and m. kamionkowski , phys . d * 60 * , 104036 ( 1999 ) . f. perrotta , c. baccigalupi , and s. matarrese , astro - ph/9906066 . holden and d. wands , gr - qc/9908026 . n. bartolo and m. pietroni , hep - ph/9908521 . e. gaztanaga and j.a . lobo , astro - ph/0003129 . b. boisseau , g. esposito - farse , d. polarski , and a.a . starobinsky , phys . * 85 * ( 2000 ) 2236 . misner , k.s . thorne , j.a . wheeler , _ gravitation _ ( san francisco , freeman , 1973 ) . bergmann , int . * 1 * , 25 ( 1968 ) ; k. nordtvedt , astrophys . j. * 161 * , 1059 ( 1970 ) ; r. wagoner , phys . rev . d * 1 * , 3209 ( 1970 ) . _ , bull . phys . soc . , abstract # k 11.05 ( 1997 ) . dickey _ et al . _ , science * 265 * , 482 ( 1994 ) ; j.g . williams , x.x . newhall , and j.o . dickey , phys . d * 53 * , 6730 ( 1996 ) . p. fiziev , gr - qc/9911037 . eddington , _ the mathematical theory of relativity _ , ( cambridge university press , cambridge , 1923 ) . b.m . barker , astrophys . j. * 219 * , 5 ( 1978 ) . bardeen , phys . d * 22 * , 1882 ( 1980 ) . l. amendola , phys . d * 60 * , 043501 ( 1999 ) . j. weller and a. albrecht , astro - ph/0008314 ; i. maor , r. brustein and p.j . steinhardt , astro - ph/0007297 ; t. chiba and t. nakamura , astro - ph/0008175 . t. damour and a. polyakov , nucl . * b423 * , 532 ( 1994 ) ; gen . * 26 * , 1171 ( 1994 ) . Abstract:

Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.

Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered . Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video . Paper: over the past few years rapid progress has been made in the field of symbolic summation . the beginning was made by gosper s telescoping algorithm @xcite for hypergeometric terms and zeilberger s extension of it to creative telescoping @xcite . an algebraic clarification of gosper s setting has been carried out by paule @xcite . meanwhile various important variations or generalizations have been developed , like for @xmath0hypergeometric terms @xcite , the mixed case @xcite , or the @xmath1-finite case @xcite . in particular , karr s telescoping algorithm @xcite based on his theory of difference fields provides a fundamental general framework for symbolic summation . his algorithm is , in a sense , the summation counterpart to risch s algorithm @xcite for indefinite integration . karr introduced the so - called @xmath2-extensions , in which parameterized first order linear difference equations can be solved in full generality ; see below . as a consequence , karr s algorithm can not only deal with telescoping and creative telescoping over hypergeometric terms , but also over rational terms consisting of arbitrarily nested sums and products . more generally , it turned out that also parameterized linear difference equations can be solved in such difference fields @xcite . this enables to solve recurrence relations with coefficients in terms of indefinite nested sums and products ; it also gives rise to algorithms for rather general classes , for instance , holonomic sequences @xcite . an important general aspect of using difference field methods is the following : in order to exploit the full power of the algorithmic machinery , it is necessary to find for a summand , given in terms of indefinite nested sums and products , a `` good '' representation in a suitable @xmath3-field extension @xmath4 of @xmath5 ; note that some similar considerations for indefinite integration appeared in @xcite . based on the results of @xcite karr comes to the following somehow misleading conclusion @xcite : _ loosely speaking , if @xmath6 is summable in @xmath4 , then part of it is summable in @xmath5 , and the rest consists of pieces whose formal sums have been adjoined to @xmath5 in the construction of @xmath4 . this makes the construction of extension fields in which @xmath6 is summable somewhat uninteresting and justifies the tendency to look for sums of @xmath7 only in @xmath5 . _ in other words , following karr s point of view , one either succeeds to express a given sum of @xmath6 in @xmath5 , or , if one fails , one adjoins the sum formally to @xmath5 which leads to a bigger field @xmath4 . but , it turns out that karr s theory of difference field extensions can be refined . namely , as shown below , his strategy in general produces sum representations that are not optimal with respect to simplification ; see , e.g. , examples [ exp : truncatednaive ] and [ exp : depthincreaseexp ] . as a measure of simplification we introduce the notion of nested depth . and the main part of this article deals with the problem of finding sum representations which are optimal with respect to this property . based on results of @xcite we develop a refined version of karr s summation theory , which leads to the definition of the so called depth - optimal @xmath3-extensions . various important properties hold in such extensions which are relevant in symbolic summation . moreover , an efficient telescoping algorithm which computes sum representations with optimal nested depth is presented . throughout this article all these ideas will be illustrated by one guiding example , namely the identity @xmath8 which was needed in @xcite to generalize identities from statistics . we stress that our algorithms are of particular importance to simplify dalembertian solutions @xcite , a subclass of liouvillian solutions @xcite , of a given recurrence ; for applications see , e.g. , @xcite . furthermore , we obtain a refined version of creative telescoping which can find recurrences with smaller order ; for applications see , e.g. , @xcite . in addition , we show how our algorithms can be used to compute efficiently algebraic relations of nested sums , like harmonic sums @xcite @xmath9 @xmath10 . we illustrate by concrete examples @xcite from perturbative quantum field theory how our algorithms can evaluate efficiently feynman diagrams . the general structure of this article is as follows . in section [ sec : symbsum ] we introduce the basic summation problems in difference fields . in section [ sec : mainresults ] we present in summarized form our refined summation theory of depth - optimal @xmath3-extensions in which the central results are supplemented by concrete examples . some first properties of depth - optimal @xmath3-extensions are proven then in section [ sec : mainrespart ] . after considering a variation of karr s reduction technique in section [ sec : reduction ] we are ready to design algorithms to construct depth - optimal @xmath3-extensions in section [ sec : constructdeltaext ] . as a consequence we can prove the main results , stated in section [ sec : mainresults ] , in section [ sec : mainproofs ] . finally , we present applications from particle physics in section [ sec : application ] . let @xmath5 be a _ difference field _ with field automorphism @xmath11 . note that @xmath12 forms a subfield of @xmath5 ; we call @xmath13 the _ constant field _ of the difference field @xmath14 . subsequently , we consider the following two problems : 1 . ( _ sequence representation _ ) : * given * sequences @xmath15 ; try to * construct * an appropriate difference field @xmath14 with elements @xmath16 where the shift - behavior @xmath17 for @xmath18 is reflected by @xmath19 . ( _ parameterized telescoping _ ) : * given * @xmath14 with @xmath20 and @xmath21 ; * find * all @xmath22 and @xmath23 such that @xmath24 then reinterpreting such a solution @xmath23 with @xmath22 in terms of a sequence @xmath25 gives @xmath26 which then holds in a certain range @xmath27 . hence , summing this equation over @xmath28 gives @xmath29 if we restrict to @xmath30 in and search for a solution with @xmath31 , we solve the telescoping problem : * given * @xmath7 ; * find * @xmath23 such that @xmath32 moreover , zeilberger s creative telescoping @xcite can be formulated by translating @xmath33 into @xmath34 for a parameter @xmath35 which occurs in the constant field @xmath36 . karr s summation theory @xcite treats these problems in the so - called @xmath2-difference fields . in our work we restrict to @xmath3-extensions @xcite being slightly less general but covering all sums and products treated explicitly in karr s work . those fields are introduced by difference field extensions . a difference field @xmath37 is a _ difference field extension _ of a difference field @xmath38 if @xmath5 is a subfield of @xmath5 and @xmath39 for all @xmath7 ; since @xmath40 and @xmath41 agree on @xmath5 , we usually do not distinguish between them anymore . a difference field extension @xmath42 of @xmath14 is a _ @xmath43-extension _ ( resp . _ @xmath44-extension _ ) , if @xmath45 is transcendental over @xmath5 , @xmath46 ( resp . @xmath47 ) for some @xmath48 and @xmath49 ; if it is clear from the context , we say that @xmath45 is a @xmath43-extension ( resp . a @xmath44-extension ) . @xmath3-extension _ is either a @xmath44-extension or a @xmath43-extension . a _ @xmath44-extension ( resp . @xmath43-extension/@xmath3-extension ) _ @xmath50 of @xmath14 is a tower of such @xmath44-extensions ( resp.@xmath43-extensions/@xmath3-extensions ) . such an extension if defined over @xmath51 if @xmath51 is a subfield of @xmath5 and for all @xmath52 , @xmath53 or @xmath54 is in @xmath55 ; note : @xmath56 , if @xmath57 . a @xmath3-extension @xmath50 of @xmath14 is called _ generalized dalembertian _ , or in short _ polynomial _ , if @xmath58 $ ] or @xmath59 for all @xmath52 . @xmath3-field @xmath14 over @xmath36 _ is a @xmath3-extension @xmath14 of @xmath60 with @xmath61 . karr derived an algorithm @xcite that solves the following more general problem which under the specialization @xmath62 and @xmath63 gives . [ rem : sigmasit ] karr s algorithm or our simplified version @xcite can be applied if @xmath14 is a @xmath3-extension of @xmath64 where @xmath64 satisfies certain properties ; see @xcite . as a consequence , we obtain algorithms for problem pfde if @xmath64 is given as follows : ( 1 ) : : @xmath65 : as worked out in ( * ? ? ? 3.2,thm . 3.5 ) , we obtain a complete algorithm , if @xmath36 is as a rational function field over an algebraic number field . ( 2 ) : : the free difference field @xmath64 with @xmath66 , @xmath67 for @xmath68 , and @xmath36 is as in * ( 1)*. in this setting generic sequences can be treated ; see @xcite . ( 3 ) : : the radical difference field @xmath69 with @xmath70 and @xmath67 where @xmath71 ; @xmath36 is given as in * ( 1)*. this allows to handle @xmath72 ; see @xcite . ( 4 ) : : @xmath64 is a @xmath3-extension of one of the difference fields described in * ( 1)**(3)*. sum - product expressions can be represented in @xmath3-fields with the following result @xcite . [ thm : pisigma ] let @xmath42 be a difference field extension of @xmath14 with @xmath73 . ( 1 ) : : @xmath45 a @xmath43-extension iff @xmath74 and there is no @xmath23 s.t . . ( 2 ) : : @xmath45 is a @xmath44-extension iff @xmath75 , @xmath76 and there are no @xmath77 s.t . @xmath78 . consequently , we are allowed to adjoin a sum formally by a @xmath43-extension if and only if there does not exist a solution of the telescoping problem . the product case works similarly ; for further information and problematic cases we refer to @xcite . [ exp : truncatednaive ] we try to simplify the left hand side of by telescoping , or equivalently , by representing in a @xmath3-field . for simplicity of representation , it will be convenient to rewrite this expression as @xmath79 ( 1 ) : : we start with the difference field @xmath80 with @xmath81 for all @xmath82 , i.e. , @xmath83 is the constant field . since there is no @xmath84 with @xmath85 , we can define the @xmath43-extension @xmath86 of @xmath60 with @xmath70 . ( 2 ) : : since there are no @xmath87 and @xmath88 with @xmath89 ( for algorithms see @xcite ) , we can define the @xmath44-extension @xmath90 of @xmath86 with @xmath91 . similarly , we introduce the @xmath44-extension @xmath92 of @xmath90 with @xmath93 . by construction , @xmath40 reflects the shift in @xmath28 with @xmath94 and @xmath95 . ( 3 ) : : next , we try to simplify @xmath96 by telescoping . since we fail , i.e. , there is no @xmath97 with @xmath98 , we add the @xmath43-extension @xmath99 of @xmath92 with @xmath100 ; note that @xmath101 . ( 4 ) : : finally , we look for a @xmath102 such that + @xmath103 + since there is none , see example [ exp : truncatednaiverat ] , we adjoin the sum in form of the @xmath43-extension @xmath104 of @xmath99 with @xmath105 . summarizing , using this straight - forward approach the sum could not be simplified : the two nested sum - quantifier is reflected by the nested definition of @xmath104 . let @xmath14 be a @xmath3-extension of @xmath64 with @xmath106 where @xmath107 or @xmath108 for @xmath52 . the _ depth function for elements of @xmath5 over @xmath109 _ , @xmath110 , is defined as follows . 1 . for any @xmath111 , @xmath112 . if @xmath113 is defined for @xmath114 with @xmath115 , we define @xmath116 ; for @xmath117 , with @xmath118 $ ] coprime , we define @xmath119 for @xmath120 , @xmath121 . the _ depth of @xmath14 _ , in short @xmath122 , is given by @xmath123 . similarly , the _ extension depth _ of a @xmath3-extension @xmath124 of @xmath14 is @xmath125 . this extension is _ ordered _ if @xmath126 ; if @xmath127 , we call @xmath124 an _ ordered _ @xmath3-field . in the @xmath3-extension @xmath104 of @xmath60 from example [ exp : truncatednaive ] the depth ( function ) is given by @xmath128 , and @xmath129 . throughout this article the depth is defined over the ground field @xmath64 ; we set @xmath130 . we might use the depth function without mentioning @xmath109 . then we assume that the corresponding difference fields are @xmath3-extensions of @xmath64 . moreover , note that the definition of @xmath131 depends on the particular way the extension field @xmath5 is build from @xmath109 . we consider the sum and take the @xmath3-field @xmath99 with @xmath132 which we introduced in example [ exp : truncatednaive ] . now we proceed differently : we compute the @xmath3-extension @xmath133 of @xmath134 with @xmath135 in which we find the solution @xmath136 of ; for details see example [ exp : constructdepthoptext ] . note that @xmath137 and @xmath138 , in particular , @xmath139 . reinterpreting @xmath140 as a sequence and checking initial values produces . we emphasize that this way we have reduced the depth in since @xmath140 and the summand @xmath141 in have the same depth @xmath142 . this example motivates us to consider the following refined telescoping problem . [ exp : s12s21 ] our goal is to encode the harmonic sums @xmath143 and @xmath144 in a @xmath3-field . ( 1 ) : : first we express @xmath145 with the inner sum @xmath146 in the @xmath3-field @xmath147 with @xmath70 , @xmath148 and @xmath149 , i.e. , @xmath150 and @xmath151 represent @xmath152 and @xmath143 , respectively ; note that we failed to express @xmath143 in an extension with depth @xmath153 . ( 2 ) : : next , we consider @xmath154 . we start with @xmath155 and construct the @xmath43-extension @xmath156 of @xmath157 with @xmath158 . finally , we treat the sum @xmath144 and look for a @xmath140 such that @xmath159 . : : since there is no @xmath160 , we take the @xmath43-extension @xmath161 of @xmath156 with @xmath162 . : : we can compute the @xmath43-extension @xmath163 of @xmath164 with @xmath165 in which we find the solution @xmath166 . note that this alternative solution has the same depth , namely @xmath167 , but the underlying @xmath3-field is simpler . as result , we obtain @xmath168 to sum up , the following version of telescoping is relevant . we shall refine karr s theory such that we can find a common solution to dot and dot@xmath169 . a difference field extension @xmath170 of @xmath14 with @xmath171 is called _ depth - optimal _ @xmath43-extension , in short @xmath172-extension , if there is no @xmath43-extension @xmath37 of @xmath14 with extension depth @xmath173 and @xmath174 such that . a @xmath3-extension @xmath50 of @xmath14 is depth - optimal , in short a @xmath175-extension , if all @xmath43-extensions - extensions are @xmath43-extensions by theorem [ thm : pisigma].1 . note also that @xmath44-extensions are not refined here ; this gives room for further investigations ; see , e.g. , @xcite . ] are depth - optimal . a @xmath175-field consists of @xmath44- and @xmath172-extensions . our main result is that problems sr , dot and dot@xmath169 can be solved algorithmically in @xmath175-extensions . moreover , we will derive various properties that are of general relevance to the field of symbolic summation and that do not hold for @xmath3-extensions in general . _ in all our results 19 , stated below and proved in section [ sec : mainproofs ] , we suppose that @xmath14 is a @xmath175-extension of @xmath64 and @xmath176 . from an algorithmic point of view we assume that @xmath64 is @xmath40-computable : _ a difference field @xmath64 is _ @xmath40-computable _ , if one can execute the usual polynomial arithmetic of multivariate polynomials over @xmath109 ( including factorization ) , and if one can solve problem pfde algorithmically in any @xmath3-extension @xmath14 of @xmath64 . for instance , @xmath64 can be any of the fields given in remark [ rem : sigmasit ] . in our examples we restrict to the case @xmath177 , i.e. , @xmath14 is a @xmath3-field over @xmath109 . * 1 . construction . * problem sr can be handled algorithmically in @xmath175-extensions . [ exp : constructdepthoptext ] the @xmath3-field @xmath99 with is depth - optimal since dot with @xmath178 and @xmath179 has no solution . moreover , @xmath180 is a @xmath172-extension of @xmath99 with . with the solution @xmath136 of we represent the sum in a @xmath175-field ; for algorithmic details see example [ exp : truncatedfullrat ] . * 2 . reordering . * let @xmath181 be a @xmath3-extension of @xmath64 with @xmath107 or @xmath108 for @xmath52 . if there is a permutation @xmath182 with @xmath183 for all @xmath184 , @xmath185 is again a @xmath3-extension of @xmath64 and @xmath186 is isomorphic to @xmath187 as fields . in short , we say that @xmath181 can be _ reordered to _ @xmath185 ; on the field level we identify such fields . clearly , by definition of nested depth there is always a reordering that brings a given field to its ordered form , i.e. , @xmath188 for @xmath52 . note that reordering of @xmath175-extensions without destroying depth - optimality is not so obvious : putting @xmath43-extensions in front or removing them , might change the situation of problem dot@xmath169 . but one of our main results says that reordering indeed does not matter . [ exp : s12reordered ] let @xmath163 be the @xmath175-field from example [ exp : s12s21 ] . then , e.g. , the ordered @xmath3-field @xmath189 is depth - optimal . depth stability . * the following example illustrates the importance of result [ res : depthstable ] . [ exp : depthincreaseexp ] let @xmath161 be the @xmath3-field from example [ exp : s12s21 ] which is not depth - optimal . we find the solution @xmath190 of with @xmath191 . hence , @xmath192 . in other words , we obtained the identity @xmath193 where the depth is increased by telescoping ; compare . we remark that result [ res : depthstable ] can be exploited algorithmically : in order to find all solutions of , one only has to take into account those extensions with depth @xmath194 . * extension stability . * the most crucial property is the following : suppose we are given a @xmath172-extension @xmath195 of @xmath14 . then we can embed any @xmath43-extension @xmath196 of @xmath14 in a @xmath172-extension @xmath37 of @xmath195 without increasing the depth . the @xmath3-field @xmath14 from example [ exp : s12reordered ] with @xmath197 is depth - optimal , and @xmath195 with @xmath198 is a @xmath172-extension of @xmath14 . now consider in addition the @xmath3-extension @xmath196 of @xmath14 with @xmath199 ; see example [ exp : s12s21 ] . then we can take the @xmath172-extension @xmath37 of @xmath195 with @xmath200 , see example [ exp : s12reordered ] , and we can define the field homomorphism @xmath201 with @xmath202 for all @xmath7 , @xmath203 and @xmath204 . by construction , @xmath205 is injective and @xmath206 for all @xmath207 . in other words , we have embedded @xmath196 in @xmath37 with for all @xmath208 . more precisely , @xmath209 is called a _ @xmath40-monomorphism/@xmath40-isomorphism _ for @xmath14 and @xmath210 if @xmath205 is a field monomorphism / isomorphism with @xmath211 for all @xmath212 . + let @xmath14 and @xmath213 be difference field extensions of @xmath196 . an _ @xmath51-monomorphism_/_@xmath51-isomorphism _ @xmath209 is a @xmath40-monomorphism/@xmath40-isomorphism with @xmath214 for all @xmath208 . * depth optimal transformation . * by result [ res : extensiondepthstable ] any @xmath3-extension of @xmath14 can be transformed to a @xmath175-extension with the same or an improved depth - behavior . hence the refinement to @xmath175-extensions does not restrict the range of applications ; on the contrary , the refinement to @xmath175-extensions can lead only to better depth behavior . * product freeness . * @xmath44-extensions are irrelevant for problem dot . + * 7 . alternative definition . * thus we obtain the following equivalent definition . + * 8 . a common solution to dot and dot@xmath169 * can be found by result [ res : depthconstruct ] and + * 9 . refined parameterized telescoping . * + [ equ : creasol ] for @xmath215 we take the @xmath175-field @xmath216 over @xmath217 with @xmath70 , @xmath218 and @xmath219 ; then @xmath220 and @xmath221 can be represented by @xmath222 , respectively . we set @xmath223 and @xmath130 , and get @xmath224 . then we find the @xmath172-extension @xmath37 of @xmath225 with @xmath226 , @xmath227 and @xmath228 which fulfills the properties from result [ res : paratele ] . in particular , we get @xmath229 and @xmath230 s.t . . hence , for @xmath231 , we get @xmath232 . summation over @xmath28 from @xmath233 to @xmath234 gives @xmath235 for @xmath236 together with @xmath237 , we arrive at the recurrence relation @xmath238 and can read off the closed form @xmath239 note : only a recurrence of order two is produced for @xmath240 by using standard creative telescoping ; see ( * ? ? ? * how to proceed . * we will prove results 19 as follows . in section [ sec : mainrespart ] we first show weaker versions of results [ res : reordering][res : constructsigmaextontop ] ; there we impose that all @xmath175-extensions are ordered . after general preparation in section [ sec : reduction ] , these results allow us to produce theorem [ thm : extendforteleordered ] ( cf . result [ res : depthconstruct ] ) in section [ sec : constructdeltaext ] . given all these properties , we will show our results 19 in full generality in section [ sec : mainproofs ] . let @xmath14 be a difference field with @xmath20 , @xmath120 and @xmath241 . we write @xmath242 and @xmath243 . let @xmath244 be a subspace of @xmath5 over @xmath36 . the _ solution space _ for @xmath245 and @xmath246 in @xmath244 is defined by @xmath247 it forms a subspace of the @xmath36-vector space @xmath248 . in particular , note that the dimension is at most @xmath249 ; see @xcite . if @xmath250 , we write in short @xmath251 thus finding bases of @xmath252 or @xmath253 solves problem pt or pfde , respectively . let @xmath254 be a rational function field . for a polynomial @xmath255 $ ] the degree is denoted by @xmath256 ; we set @xmath257 . we define @xmath258 , \deg(p)<\deg(q)\ } } } ; & { \mathbb{f}}[t]_k&:={{\{p\in{\mathbb{f}}[t]\,|\,\deg(p)\leq k\}}}\end{aligned}\ ] ] for @xmath259 . let @xmath260^n$ ] . then @xmath261 gives the @xmath262-th coefficient of @xmath263 $ ] . moreover , we define @xmath264 * extensions and reordering.*[page : ordering ] we will exploit the following fact frequently : if @xmath265 is a @xmath3-extension of @xmath64 and @xmath266 is a @xmath3-extension of @xmath265 over @xmath109 , we can reorder @xmath266 to the @xmath3-extension @xmath267 of @xmath64 . + we call a difference field @xmath268 a @xmath3-extension ( resp . @xmath43-extension/@xmath44-extension ) of @xmath181 if there is a @xmath3-extension ( resp . @xmath43-extension/@xmath44-extension ) @xmath269 of @xmath181 over @xmath109 such that we get the difference field @xmath268 by reordering the difference field @xmath269 . note that here @xmath270 could be @xmath271 , but additional reordering might be possible . in a nutshell , we enlarge the ground field @xmath109 by additional @xmath3-extensions to the field @xmath270 where @xmath268 is still a @xmath3-extension of @xmath181 . * basic properties . * the next properties follow from karr s theory @xcite . [ lemma : karr ] let @xmath272 with @xmath273 be a @xmath3-extension of @xmath196 . let @xmath274 and suppose there is a solution @xmath275 with @xmath276 , but no solution in @xmath51 . if @xmath277 is a @xmath44-extension , then @xmath76 and @xmath278 for some @xmath279 and @xmath280 ; if @xmath277 is a @xmath43-extension , then @xmath281 and @xmath74 . [ cor : extendpioversigma ] let @xmath195 be a @xmath43-extension of @xmath14 . if @xmath42 is a @xmath44-extension of @xmath14 with @xmath47 , then @xmath282 is a @xmath44-extension of @xmath195 with @xmath47 . write @xmath283 with the @xmath43-extensions @xmath284 . if @xmath285 , nothing has to be shown . suppose that @xmath282 is not a @xmath44-extension of @xmath195 . then we find a @xmath286 with @xmath287 for some @xmath288 by theorem [ thm : pisigma].2 . by lemma [ lemma : karr ] it follows that @xmath23 . hence @xmath42 is not a @xmath44-extension of @xmath14 by theorem [ thm : pisigma].2 . [ prop : propertiesinpisi ] let @xmath37 be a @xmath3-extension of @xmath14 with @xmath13 and @xmath7 . ( 1 ) : : if there is a @xmath289 such that , then there is no @xmath23 such that . ( 2 ) : : let @xmath290 with @xmath291 or @xmath292 for @xmath52 . if @xmath174 s.t . , then @xmath293 where @xmath294 and @xmath295 ; moreover , @xmath296 , if @xmath59 . * ( 1 ) * assume there are such @xmath297 and @xmath289 . then @xmath298 , and thus @xmath299 , a contradiction that @xmath37 is a @xmath3-extension of @xmath14 . * ( 2 ) * is a special case of ( * ? ? ? * result , page 314 ) ; see also ( * ? ? ? * thm . 4.2.1 ) . [ prop : homproperties ] let @xmath14 , @xmath210 be difference fields with a @xmath40-isomorphism @xmath209 . ( 1 ) : : let @xmath42 and @xmath300 be @xmath43-extensions of @xmath14 and @xmath210 , respectively , with @xmath301 such that @xmath302 . then there is a @xmath40-isomorphism @xmath303 with @xmath304 and @xmath305 for all @xmath7 . ( 2 ) : : let @xmath42 be a @xmath3-extension of @xmath14 with @xmath306 . then there is a @xmath3-extension @xmath307 of @xmath213 with @xmath308 . moreover , there is the @xmath40-isomorphism @xmath309 where @xmath310 and @xmath311 for all @xmath212 . ( 3 ) : : let @xmath37 be a @xmath3-extension of @xmath14 then there is a @xmath3-extension @xmath312 of @xmath213 with a @xmath40-isomorphism @xmath309 where @xmath311 for all @xmath212 . * ( 1 ) * let @xmath313 , and let @xmath301 such that @xmath314 . by proposition [ prop : propertiesinpisi].2 there are a @xmath315 and a @xmath316 such that @xmath317 . since @xmath318 is transcendental over @xmath319 , also @xmath140 is transcendental over @xmath319 . therefore we can define the field isomorphism @xmath320 with @xmath304 and @xmath305 for all @xmath7 . we have @xmath321 and thus @xmath322 is a @xmath40-isomorphism . since @xmath323 , the first part is proven . * ( 2 ) * let @xmath42 be a @xmath3-extension of @xmath14 with @xmath306 . since @xmath205 is a @xmath40-isomorphism , there is a @xmath3-extension @xmath307 of @xmath210 with @xmath308 by theorem [ thm : pisigma].1 . we can construct the field isomorphism @xmath303 with @xmath310 and @xmath311 for all @xmath212 . since @xmath324 , @xmath322 is a @xmath40-isomorphism . iterative application of * ( 2 ) * shows * ( 3)*. we will show the first properties of depth - optimal @xmath3-extensions ; some of the following results and proofs are simplified and streamlined versions of @xcite [ prop : twonestedext ] a @xmath3-extension @xmath181 of @xmath64 with @xmath325 , @xmath326 and @xmath177 is depth - optimal . @xmath327 is depth - optimal . suppose that @xmath328 is not depth - optimal with @xmath329 . set @xmath330 . then there is a @xmath3-extension @xmath124 of @xmath14 with @xmath331 and @xmath332 such that . by prop . [ prop : propertiesinpisi].2 , @xmath333 for some @xmath334 . then @xmath335 ; a contradiction to theorem [ thm : pisigma].1 . [ lemma : depthstablesummation ] let @xmath37 with @xmath290 be an ordered @xmath175-extension of @xmath14 with @xmath336 and @xmath337 . let @xmath7 with @xmath338 . then for any @xmath174 with , @xmath339 . suppose we have with @xmath174 and @xmath340 . hence @xmath140 depends on one of the @xmath328 , i.e. , let @xmath341 and @xmath342 such that @xmath343 . by proposition [ prop : propertiesinpisi].2 , @xmath344 where @xmath207 , @xmath345 and @xmath346 . since the extension is ordered , @xmath347 . by proposition [ prop : propertiesinpisi].1 there is no @xmath348 with @xmath349 . therefore by theorem [ thm : pisigma].1 one can construct a @xmath43-extension @xmath350 of @xmath196 with @xmath171 where @xmath351 . note that @xmath352 with @xmath353 . hence @xmath328 is not depth - optimal , a contradiction . therefore @xmath339 . [ thm : depthstableordered ] let @xmath14 be an ordered @xmath175-extension of @xmath64 and @xmath354 . if @xmath23 as in , then . since @xmath355 , @xmath356 . if @xmath357 , then @xmath142 otherwise , since @xmath14 is ordered , we can split @xmath5 into the @xmath175-extension @xmath14 of @xmath196 with @xmath358 ( @xmath359 ) and the @xmath175-extension @xmath196 of @xmath64 where @xmath360 for each @xmath52 and @xmath361 . by lemma [ lemma : depthstablesummation ] , @xmath362 . [ lemma : shiftsumtoleft ] let @xmath50 be a @xmath175-extension of @xmath14 and @xmath363 be a @xmath43-extension of @xmath50 with @xmath364 for all @xmath52 . by reordering , @xmath365 is a @xmath175-extension of @xmath366 . we show the lemma by induction . if @xmath285 , nothing has to be shown . consider @xmath367 as claimed above with @xmath368 . then by the induction assumption @xmath369 is a @xmath175-extension of @xmath370 . note that @xmath371 is a @xmath3-extension of @xmath14 . if @xmath327 is a @xmath44-extension , we are done . otherwise , suppose that @xmath327 is a @xmath43-extension with @xmath372 which is not depth - optimal . then there is a @xmath43-extension @xmath196 of @xmath366 with extension depth @xmath373 and @xmath374 such that . since @xmath375 , @xmath196 is a @xmath43-extension of @xmath14 with extension depth @xmath373 . a contradiction that @xmath376 is a @xmath172-extension of @xmath14 . the following two propositions will be heavily used in section [ sec : constructdeltaext ] . [ prop : extensionontop ] let @xmath37 with @xmath290 be an ordered @xmath175-extension of @xmath14 where @xmath336 and @xmath377 . suppose that @xmath124 is a @xmath43-extension of @xmath14 with @xmath378 and @xmath379 for @xmath380 . then the following holds . ( 1 ) : : there is the @xmath43-extension @xmath381 of @xmath37 with @xmath382 for all @xmath383 with @xmath380 . ( 2 ) : : in particular , by reordering , we get the @xmath3-extension @xmath384 of @xmath14 ; @xmath384 is a @xmath175-extension of @xmath124 . * ( 1 ) * let @xmath385 be minimal s.t.@xmath386 is not a @xmath43-extension of @xmath37 . take @xmath387 s.t . hence @xmath339 , i.e. , @xmath389 by lemma [ lemma : depthstablesummation ] ; this contradicts thm . [ thm : pisigma].1 . iterative application of lemma [ lemma : shiftsumtoleft ] proves * ( 2)*. [ prop : reorderequaldepth ] let @xmath50 be a @xmath175-extension of @xmath14 with @xmath390 for @xmath52 and @xmath391 . for @xmath182 , @xmath392 is a @xmath175-extension of @xmath14 . let @xmath393 ( @xmath285 is trivial ) ; take @xmath394 with @xmath395 such that @xmath396 is not a @xmath172-extension of @xmath397 with @xmath398 . choose a @xmath43-extension @xmath399 of @xmath397 with @xmath400 and @xmath401 such that . note that @xmath402 is a @xmath43-extension of @xmath14 by reordering ; hence by prop . [ prop : extensionontop].2 , @xmath403 is a @xmath43-extension of @xmath50 . let @xmath404 . by prop . [ prop : propertiesinpisi].2 , @xmath405 where @xmath406 and @xmath407 . let @xmath408 be maximal such @xmath409 ; if @xmath296 for all @xmath410 , set @xmath411 . if @xmath412 , @xmath413 for @xmath414 . otherwise , @xmath415 with @xmath416 for @xmath417 . summarizing , @xmath418 is not a @xmath172-extension of @xmath419 , a contradiction . [ thm : constructsigmaextontopordered ] let @xmath14 be a @xmath3-extension of @xmath64 and let @xmath195 be a @xmath43-extension of @xmath14 which can be brought to an ordered @xmath175-extension of @xmath64 . then for any @xmath43-extension @xmath196 of @xmath14 with extension depth @xmath420 there is a @xmath43-extension @xmath37 of @xmath195 with extension depth @xmath421 and an @xmath5-monomorphism @xmath201 s.t . for @xmath208 . let @xmath422 be an ordered @xmath175-extension of @xmath14 that we get by reordering the @xmath43-extension @xmath195 of @xmath14 . moreover , let @xmath196 be a @xmath43-extension of @xmath14 with extension depth @xmath420 , i.e. , @xmath423 . suppose that @xmath424 , otherwise we can reorder it without loosing any generality . we show that there is a @xmath43-extension @xmath37 of @xmath422 with extension depth @xmath421 and an @xmath5-monomorphism @xmath201 with @xmath425 for @xmath208 . then reordering of @xmath422 proves the statement for the extension @xmath195 of @xmath14 . + if @xmath285 , i.e. , @xmath426 , the statement is proven by taking @xmath427 with the @xmath5-monomorphism @xmath428 where @xmath214 for all @xmath212 . otherwise , suppose that @xmath429 with @xmath430 and @xmath431 where @xmath432 and @xmath433 . moreover , assume that there is a @xmath43-extension @xmath312 of @xmath422 with extension depth @xmath434 together with an @xmath5-monomorphism @xmath435 such that for all @xmath436 . now define @xmath437 . by assumption @xmath438 * case 1 : * suppose that there is no @xmath439 as in . then we can construct the @xmath43-extension @xmath440 of @xmath312 with @xmath441 by theorem [ thm : pisigma].1 and can define the @xmath5-monomorphism @xmath442 such that @xmath311 for all @xmath436 and @xmath443 . with we get @xmath444 . by the induction assumption , @xmath445 for all @xmath446 . clearly , the @xmath43-extension @xmath440 of @xmath422 has extension depth @xmath421 . + * case 2 : * suppose there is a @xmath447 with @xmath448 . since @xmath312 is a @xmath43-extension of @xmath422 with extension depth @xmath434 ( @xmath449 ) we can apply lemma [ lemma : shiftsumtoleft ] and obtain by reordering of @xmath312 an ordered @xmath175-extension @xmath450 of @xmath451 where @xmath452 and @xmath453 for all @xmath454 . hence with we can apply lemma [ lemma : depthstablesummation ] and it follows that @xmath455 , i.e. , @xmath456 since @xmath205 is a monomorphism , there is no @xmath140 in the image @xmath457 such that . since @xmath458 is a difference field ( it is a sub - difference field of @xmath312 ) , @xmath459 is transcendental over @xmath457 by theorem [ thm : pisigma].1 . in particular , we get the @xmath5-monomorphism @xmath460 with @xmath311 for all @xmath436 and @xmath443 . with and our induction assumption it follows that @xmath445 for all @xmath446 . this completes the induction step . we modify karr s reduction for problem pt : given a @xmath3-extension @xmath461 of @xmath196 and @xmath462 ; find a basis @xmath463 of @xmath464 , as follows : first split @xmath465 by polynomial division in the form @xmath466 such that @xmath467 and @xmath468^n$ ] ; in short we write @xmath469^n.\ ] ] then the following lemma , a direct consequence of ( * ? ? ? * lemma 3.1 ) , is crucial . [ lemma : splitproblem ] let @xmath461 be a @xmath3-extension of @xmath196 with @xmath306 and . then @xmath470 , @xmath471 $ ] solve iff @xmath472 and @xmath473 . note that we get a first strategy : find bases for @xmath474 and @xmath475})}$ ] , and afterwards combine the solutions accordingly to get a basis of @xmath476 . as it will turn out , the following version , presented in figure [ fig : ratred ] , is more appropriate : first solve the rational problem ( rp ) ; if there is no solution , there is no solution for the original problem . otherwise plug in the rational solutions into our ansatz and continue to find the polynomial solutions ( problem pp ) ; for details see remark [ rem : ratdetails ] . @xmath477\txt{task : find a basis of\\ $ { \mathbb{v}}={{\rm v}({\boldsymbol{f}},{{\mathbb{h}}(t)})}$}\ar[d]\\ * + [ f-:<3pt>]{\txt{set up~\eqref{equ : splitf } by polynomial division}}\ar[d]&*+[f-:<3pt>]{\txt{set up $ { \boldsymbol{p'}}\in{\mathbb{h}}[t]^m$ by~\eqref{equ : polyf}.}}\ar[d]\\ * + [ f--]{\txt{{{\sf rp } } : find a basis $ r$ of $ { { \rm v}({\boldsymbol{h}},{{{{\mathbb{h}}(t)}_{\text{\tiny(r)}}}})}$}}\ar@{.>}|{r}@/_1.8pc/[dr]\ar[dd]_{r=\{\}}\ar[ru]|<(.3){r\neq\{\}}&*+[f--]{\txt{{{\sf pp } } : find a basis $ p$ of $ { { \rm v}({\boldsymbol{p'}},{{\mathbb{h}}[t]})}$. } } \ar@{.>}_{p}[d]\\ & * + [ f.]{\txt{combine $ r$ and $ p$ to a basis $ b$ of $ { \mathbb{v}}$}}\ar[d]\\ * + [ f-,]\txt{return : $ \{\}$}&*+[f-,]\txt{return $ b$ } } \ ] ] [ rem : ratdetails ] find a basis @xmath478 of @xmath474 ; note that @xmath479 . if @xmath480 , then @xmath481 by lemma [ lemma : splitproblem ] . otherwise , define @xmath482 and @xmath483 . then we look for all @xmath484 and @xmath485 $ ] such that @xmath486 since @xmath487 and @xmath488 by construction , problem is equivalent to looking for all @xmath484 and @xmath485 $ ] s.t.@xmath489 hence , set up @xmath490 where @xmath491^m$ ] and find a basis @xmath492 of @xmath493})}$ ] . note that @xmath494 , since there is the trivial solution @xmath495 ; define @xmath496 and @xmath497 . then with it follows that @xmath498 thus , if we define @xmath499 and @xmath500 , we get a set of generators @xmath501 that spans a subspace of @xmath464 . by simple linear algebra arguments it follows that @xmath463 is a basis of @xmath244 . [ exp : truncatednaiverat ] consider the ordered @xmath175-field @xmath99 over @xmath502 with and @xmath503 . by we have @xmath504 and @xmath505 . following the reduction of figure [ fig : ratred ] , we need a basis @xmath506 of @xmath507 ; obviously @xmath508 . thus @xmath509 by . in example [ exp : truncatednaivepoly ] we will show that @xmath510 is a basis of @xmath511)})}$ ] . by remark [ rem : ratdetails ] a basis of @xmath512 is @xmath513 . _ in @xcite the reversed strategy was proposed : first consider the polynomial and afterwards the rational problem . related to problems dot and dot@xmath169 , the following remark is in place . in lemma [ lemma : ratext ] we will show that the solutions of rp are independent of the type of extension that are needed to solve problems dot , dot@xmath169 . thus , we will consider problem rp first . if there is no solution , we can stop ; see corollary [ cor : polyratext ] . otherwise , we will attack problems dot , dot on @xmath514 which is usually simpler ( @xmath515 ) than @xmath516 . the next lemma will be needed in section [ sec : depthspeedup ] to solve problems dot , dot@xmath169 efficiently . [ lemma : entriesinpolcase ] let @xmath461 be a @xmath3-extension of @xmath196 and @xmath465 . if @xmath208 occurs in @xmath246 , then the reduction in figure [ fig : ratred ] can be applied so that @xmath517 occurs in @xmath514 . let @xmath208 occur in the @xmath383th position of @xmath246 . write @xmath518^n$ ] . then the @xmath383th entry in @xmath519 is zero . hence , we can take a basis @xmath506 for @xmath474 where the @xmath383th unit - vector is in @xmath506 . applying it follows that @xmath517 occurs in @xmath514 . subproblem rp has been solved in ( * ? ? ? * sections 3.4 , 3.5 ) . alternatively , this task can be accomplished by computing a basis @xmath520 of @xmath521 by using , e.g. , algorithm @xcite which is based on results from @xcite . namely , by ( * ? ? ? 1,2 ) it follows that @xmath522 hence a basis @xmath506 for @xmath474 can be derived by simple manipulation of the basis @xmath520 . + we remark that both approaches can be solved algorithmically if @xmath196 is @xmath40-computable . as in karr s reduction @xcite we bound the degree of the polynomial solutions . [ lemma : degbound ] let @xmath461 be a @xmath3-extension of @xmath196 and let @xmath523^m$ ] . then @xmath524_b})}={{\rm v}({\boldsymbol{p'}},{{\mathbb{h}}[t]})}$ ] for @xmath525 thus we set up @xmath526 and @xmath527^m_{r}$ ] and look for a basis @xmath528 of @xmath529_r})}$ ] . we will accomplish this task by solving instances of problem pfdein @xmath196 ; see also ( * ? ? ? 12 ) or ( * ? ? ? note that this is possible if @xmath196 is @xmath40-computable . if @xmath530 , we are already in the base case . otherwise , let @xmath531 . then we try to get all @xmath532_{r}$ ] and @xmath533 such that @xmath534 as follows . first , we derive the possible leading coefficients @xmath535 in @xmath196 , then we plug in the resulting solutions into @xmath534 and look for the remaining @xmath536 by recursion . the technical details are given in remark [ rem : polytechnical ] , and a graphical illustration is presented in figure [ fig : polyred ] : here the task of finding a basis of @xmath537 is reduced to finding a basis of the `` leading coefficients '' ( problem cp ) and to finding a basis of the `` remaining coefficients '' @xmath538 . @xmath539\txt{return $ b_r$}&*+[f=]{\txt{task : find a basis $ b_r$ of\\ $ { \mathbb{v}}_r:={{\rm v}({\boldsymbol{f_r}},{{\mathbb{h}}[t]_r})}$.}}\ar[d]&*+[f-,]\txt{return\\ $ \{{({0,\dots,0,1})}\}$}&*+[f-,]+<-1.3cm,0cm>\txt{return $ \tilde{b}_r$}\\ * + [ f.]\txt{combine $ b_{r-1}$ and $ \tilde{b}_r$\\ to get a basis $ b_r$ of $ { \mathbb{v}}_{r}$.}\ar@{.>}[u]&*+[f-:<3pt>]\txt{set up $ { \boldsymbol{\tilde{f}_r}}$ by~\eqref{equ : defineftilde}}\ar[r]&*+[f--]\txt{{{\sf cp } } : find a basis $ \tilde{b}_r$\\of $ { { \rm v}({{({\alpha^r,-1})}},{\boldsymbol{\tilde{f}_r}},{{\mathbb{h}}})}$ } \ar[ur]_<(0.5){r=0}\ar@{.>}@/^2pc/[ll]_{\tilde{b}_r}\ar[u]^{r>0\wedge\tilde{b}_r=\{\}}\ar[d]^{r>0\wedge\tilde{b}_r\neq\{\}}\\ & * + [ f=]{\txt{task : find a basis $ b_{r-1}$ of\\ $ { \mathbb{v}}_{r-1}:={{\rm v}({\boldsymbol{f_{r-1}}},{{\mathbb{h}}[t]_{r-1}})}$.}}\ar@{.>}@/^2pc/[lu]|<(.55){b_{r-1 } } & * + [ f-:<3pt>]\txt{set up $ { \boldsymbol{f_{r-1}}}$ by~\eqref{equ : definefdeltam}}\ar[l]\\ } \ ] ] [ rem : polytechnical ] the main task is to find a basis @xmath528 of @xmath540_r})}$ ] . first , define @xmath541 where @xmath542 . then find a basis @xmath543 of @xmath544 . if @xmath545 , then @xmath546 and @xmath547_{r-1}$ ] are the only choices , i.e. , @xmath548 . otherwise , if @xmath549 , define @xmath550 @xmath551 by construction , @xmath552_{r-1}^{\lambda}$ ] . now we proceed as follows . find all @xmath553_{r-1}$ ] and @xmath554 such that @xmath555 which is equivalent to @xmath556 therefore the subtask is to find a basis @xmath557 of @xmath558_{r-1}})}$ ] ; note that @xmath559 , since @xmath495 . given @xmath560 and @xmath561 , a basis for @xmath540_{r}})}$ ] can be constructed as follows . define @xmath562 , @xmath563^{l}_{r-1}$ ] , @xmath564 , and @xmath565_r^l$ ] . then by the set @xmath566 spans a subspace of @xmath567})}$ ] . by simple linear algebra arguments it follows that @xmath528 is a basis of @xmath537 . [ exp : truncatednaivepoly ] given the @xmath3-field @xmath350 over @xmath36 with @xmath568 and @xmath569 from example [ exp : truncatednaiverat ] , we compute a basis of @xmath570})}$ ] as follows . we start the reduction of figure [ fig : polyred ] with @xmath571 , see , and @xmath572 . @xmath573 : : : by we get @xmath574 ; a basis of @xmath575 is @xmath576 . @xmath577 : : : we get @xmath578 by and @xmath579 by . by another reduction in @xmath51 we compute the basis @xmath580 of @xmath581 . @xmath530 : : : @xmath582 by . clearly , @xmath583 is a basis of @xmath584 . finally , we combine @xmath585 , @xmath586 and @xmath587 and get the basis @xmath588 , @xmath589 of @xmath590_1})}$ ] , @xmath591_2})}$ ] , respectively . thus @xmath592 is a basis of @xmath593})}$ ] . + we that the summand @xmath594 of @xmath595 given in occurs in @xmath596 . this observation is crucial for our refined summation algorithm ; see example [ exp : truncatedfullpoly ] . [ rem : ratpolyred ] if @xmath530 , or if @xmath531 and @xmath45 is a @xmath43-extension ( @xmath597 ) , problem cp is nothing else than problem pt in the ground field @xmath196 . hence , we can apply again the reductions presented in the figures [ fig : ratred ] and [ fig : polyred ] to the subfield @xmath51 . more precisely , if @xmath181 is a @xmath3-extension of a @xmath40-computable @xmath64 , we reduce problem pt to pt in the fields below whenever possible , and change to the more general situation pfde only when it is necessary . this strategy will be the basis to construct @xmath172-extensions in section [ sec : constructdeltaext ] . the following lemmata are needed for our refined algorithms . lemma [ lemma : singeextplde ] is immediate by construction ; it is used to prove corollary [ cor : incremredref ] . lemma [ lemma : entriesingroundfield ] is crucial in section [ sec : depthspeedup ] . [ lemma : singeextplde ] let @xmath598 be a @xmath3-extension of @xmath14 with @xmath306 where @xmath599 . set @xmath600 , let @xmath531 , @xmath601^m_r$ ] and @xmath602 with . if the coefficients with the monomial @xmath603 in @xmath604_r})}$ ] are free of the @xmath605 , it suffices to take a basis of @xmath606 to get a basis of @xmath244 following the reduction in figure [ fig : polyred ] . [ lemma : entriesingroundfield ] let @xmath461 be a @xmath3-extension of @xmath196 with @xmath607 and @xmath491^m$ ] . suppose we succeed in reducing the problem to the base case @xmath530 with @xmath608 . ( 1 ) : : the reduction can be applied s.t . all entries of @xmath514 which are in @xmath5 also occur in @xmath609 . ( 2 ) : : moreover , if @xmath597 , we can guarantee that @xmath610 occurs in @xmath609 . * ( 1 ) * suppose that @xmath212 occurs in the @xmath383th position of @xmath514 . define @xmath611 by and set @xmath612 . if @xmath530 , nothing has to be shown . otherwise , suppose that @xmath531 . since @xmath208 , the @xmath383th entry in @xmath613 , defined by , is zero . hence we can choose a basis @xmath561 of @xmath614 where the @xmath383th unit - vector is in @xmath561 and all other elements of @xmath561 have zero in the @xmath383th position . with the corresponding @xmath615 and we get @xmath616 where @xmath517 pops up . this construction can be done for all such entries of @xmath514 which are in @xmath5 . if we continue with this refined reduction to the case @xmath609 , all @xmath5-entries of @xmath514 occur in @xmath609 . + * ( 2 ) * assume that @xmath45 is a @xmath43-extension . hence @xmath617 by . suppose we are in the reduction for @xmath577 . since @xmath581 contains @xmath618 , we can choose a basis @xmath586 with @xmath619 . by construction of @xmath609 it follows that @xmath620 occurs in @xmath609 . we focus on the problem when extensions do not contribute to solutions of pfde . [ lemma : ratext ] let @xmath461 be a @xmath3-extension of @xmath196 and @xmath621 be a @xmath3-ext . of @xmath461 over @xmath51 . for @xmath467 , @xmath622 suppose we find an additional solution in a @xmath3-extension @xmath621 of @xmath461 over @xmath51 , i.e. , there is a @xmath623 such that @xmath140 depends on @xmath624 and @xmath625 for some @xmath470 . take such a solution and define @xmath626 . now reorder the extension to the @xmath3-extension @xmath627 of @xmath196 . with proposition [ prop : propertiesinpisi].2 it follows that @xmath628 for some @xmath629 and @xmath630 . write @xmath631 with @xmath632 $ ] ; @xmath633 . then @xmath634 . since @xmath635 and @xmath636 are free of @xmath624 , @xmath637 , i.e. , @xmath638 . [ cor : polyratext ] let @xmath461 be a @xmath3-extension of @xmath196 and let @xmath621 be a @xmath3-extension of @xmath461 over @xmath51 . let @xmath639 and take @xmath464 and @xmath640 . write @xmath466 as in . ( 1 ) : : if @xmath641 , then @xmath642 . ( 2 ) : : otherwise , define @xmath491^m$ ] and @xmath643 by and . then @xmath644 iff @xmath524_b})}={{\rm v}({\boldsymbol{p'}},{{\mathbb{h}}(x_1)\dots(x_r)[t]_b})}.$ ] if @xmath506 , @xmath645 are bases of @xmath646 and @xmath647_b})}$ ] , respectively , we get a basis of @xmath648 as given in remark [ rem : ratdetails ] . by lemma [ lemma : ratext ] we have @xmath649 , i.e. , @xmath506 is also a basis of @xmath650 . thus , if @xmath480 , then @xmath642 ; see fig . [ fig : ratred ] . this proves * ( 1)*. otherwise , let @xmath514 and @xmath643 be as assumed . note that @xmath643 bounds the polynomial solutions in @xmath651 $ ] _ and _ @xmath652 $ ] by lemma [ lemma : degbound ] . hence , if @xmath524_b})}={{\rm v}({\boldsymbol{p'}},{{\mathbb{h}}(x_1)\dots(x_e)[t]_b})}$ ] , then by remark [ rem : ratdetails ] we get @xmath644 . conversely , if @xmath524_b})}\subsetneq{{\rm v}({\boldsymbol{p'}},{{\mathbb{h}}(x_1)\dots(x_e)[t]_b})}$ ] , then @xmath653 by construction . this proves * ( 2)*. consequently , if one wants to find an extension with additional solutions , one has to focus on problem cp ; see fig . [ fig : polyred ] . with lemma [ lemma : noextforpi ] we can refine this observation in corollary [ cor : incremredref ] . [ lemma : noextforpi ] let @xmath461 be a @xmath44-extension of @xmath196 and let @xmath621 be a @xmath3-extension of @xmath461 over @xmath51 . set @xmath654 . then for @xmath655 and @xmath531 , @xmath656 suppose that @xmath657 . then there are @xmath470 and @xmath658 for some @xmath659 such that @xmath660 . note : there is no @xmath661 with @xmath662 . ( otherwise , @xmath663 . since @xmath664 , we get @xmath665 for @xmath666 . but , by reordering we get the @xmath44-extension @xmath667 of @xmath668 , a contradiction by theorem [ thm : pisigma].2 . ) thus we can apply lemma [ lemma : karr ] : if @xmath334 is a @xmath44-extension with @xmath669 for some @xmath670 , @xmath671 for some @xmath280 and @xmath672 . hence , @xmath673 with @xmath674 . otherwise , if @xmath334 is a @xmath43-extension , @xmath675 . summarizing , @xmath676 for some @xmath677 . since @xmath678 is a @xmath44-extension of @xmath679 , this contradicts theorem [ thm : pisigma].2 . [ cor : incremredref ] let @xmath461 be a @xmath3-extension of @xmath196 and take a @xmath3-extension @xmath680 of @xmath461 over @xmath51 where for @xmath681 we have @xmath682 or @xmath683 . let @xmath531 , @xmath684^m_r$ ] , and set @xmath685_r})}$ ] and @xmath686_r})}$ ] . define @xmath613 and @xmath616 as in and . ( 1 ) @xmath687 : : : if @xmath688 and + @xmath689_{r-1}})}={{\rm v}({\boldsymbol{f_{r-1}}},{{\mathbb{h}}[t]_{r-1}})}$ ] , then @xmath690 . + given the basis @xmath557 of @xmath689_{r-1}})}$ ] and the basis @xmath691 of @xmath692 , one gets a basis of @xmath693 as stated in remark [ rem : polytechnical ] . ( 2 ) @xmath694 : : : if @xmath689_{r-1}})}={{\rm v}({\boldsymbol{f_{r-1}}},{{\mathbb{h}}[t]_{r-1}})}$ ] , then @xmath690 . given the basis @xmath557 of @xmath689_{r-1}})}$ ] and the basis @xmath691 of @xmath614 , one gets a basis of @xmath693 as stated in remark [ rem : polytechnical ] . * ( 1 ) * @xmath45 is a @xmath43-extension : by prop . [ prop : propertiesinpisi].2 the leading coefficients with degree @xmath262 in the solutions of @xmath693 are free of @xmath695 . hence , by lemma [ lemma : singeextplde ] it suffices to take a basis of @xmath692 to get a basis of @xmath693 following remark [ rem : polytechnical ] . thus , if @xmath696_{r-1}})}={{\rm v}({\boldsymbol{f_{r-1}}},{{\mathbb{h}}(x_1)\dots(x_l)(y_1)\dots(y_k)[t]_{r-1}})}$ ] and @xmath688 , then @xmath644 by remark [ rem : polytechnical ] . given @xmath557 , @xmath691 from above one gets a basis of @xmath693 . + * ( 2 ) * if @xmath697 , then @xmath698 by lemma [ lemma : noextforpi ] . hence , if @xmath689_{r-1}})}={{\rm v}({\boldsymbol{f_{r-1}}},{{\mathbb{h}}[t]_{r-1}})}$ ] , @xmath644 by remark [ rem : polytechnical ] . given the bases @xmath557 , @xmath691 as stated above , one gets a basis of @xmath693 . subsequently , we prove the following theorem which will establish result [ res : depthconstruct ] in section [ sec : mainproofs ] . [ thm : extendforteleordered ] let @xmath14 be an ordered @xmath175-extension of @xmath64 and @xmath7 . then there is a @xmath43-extension @xmath37 of @xmath14 such that @xmath37 can be brought to an ordered @xmath175-extension of @xmath64 and such that there is a @xmath174 as in . if @xmath64 is @xmath40-computable , such an @xmath37 and @xmath140 can be given explicitly . in order to accomplish this task , we consider the following more general situation . [ def : completea ] let @xmath14 be a @xmath3-extension of @xmath64 and @xmath699 . then @xmath14 is _ @xmath700complete _ , if for any @xmath3-extension are @xmath43-extensions . ] @xmath701 of @xmath14 with extension depth @xmath702 we have @xmath703 . that is to say , we show the following theorem . [ thm : algtheorema ] let @xmath14 be an ordered @xmath175-extension of @xmath64 , @xmath704 and @xmath699 . then there is a @xmath43-extension @xmath195 of @xmath14 which is @xmath700complete and which can be brought to an ordered @xmath175-extension of @xmath64 . if @xmath64 is @xmath40-computable , then such an @xmath195 and a basis of @xmath705 can be given explicitly . then theorem [ thm : extendforteleordered ] is implied by the following lemma . [ lemma : basiccomplete ] let @xmath14 be a @xmath3-extension of @xmath64 and @xmath699 . if @xmath14 is @xmath706complete , then @xmath707 . suppose @xmath708 , i.e. , there is a @xmath470 such that there is no @xmath23 with @xmath709 . thus there is the @xmath43-extension @xmath170 of @xmath14 with @xmath171 and @xmath710 . hence @xmath14 is not @xmath706complete . namely , we conclude by theorem [ thm : algtheorema ] that there is a @xmath43-extension @xmath195 of @xmath14 which is @xmath711complete and which can be brought to an ordered @xmath175-extension of @xmath64 . hence by lemma [ lemma : basiccomplete ] there is a @xmath712 such that . in most applications one works with a @xmath3-field over @xmath109 , with @xmath70 for some @xmath713 . in this case , the following shortcut can be applied ; the proof is similar to prop . [ prop : twonestedext ] . [ lemma : shortcut2 ] let @xmath14 be a @xmath3-field over @xmath109 and @xmath699 . if @xmath714 for some @xmath23 , then @xmath14 is @xmath715complete . the proof of theorem [ thm : algtheorema ] will be obtained by refining the reduction of section [ sec : reduction ] . namely , let @xmath716 , let @xmath37 with @xmath290 be an ordered @xmath175-extension of @xmath64 where @xmath285 or @xmath717 , and let @xmath718 . then loosely speaking , we will obtain an @xmath700complete extension @xmath195 of @xmath37 by constructing step by step a tower of extensions , say @xmath719 , where @xmath720 is a @xmath172-extension of @xmath721 for @xmath722 . within this construction problem cp in figure [ fig : polyred ] will be refined to the following subproblem : we are given a vector @xmath723 with entries from @xmath724 , and we have to enrich @xmath724 by @xmath172-extensions to @xmath725 such that @xmath725 becomes @xmath726-compete . note that during this extension process it is crucial that @xmath727 forms a @xmath175-extension of @xmath720 for each @xmath722 . in order to get a grip on this situation , we introduce the following definition , which reduces to definition [ def : completeb ] when @xmath285 . [ def : completeb ] let @xmath37 be a @xmath3-extension of @xmath14 with @xmath290 and @xmath699 . then @xmath37 is _ @xmath728complete _ , if for any @xmath3-extension @xmath729 of @xmath37 over @xmath5 with extension depth @xmath702 we have @xmath703 . subsequently , we prove the following theorem which implies theorems [ thm : algtheorema ] and [ thm : extendforteleordered ] . [ thm : algtheoremb ] let @xmath704 and let @xmath50 be an ordered @xmath175-extension of @xmath64 ; if @xmath368 , @xmath730 . let @xmath699 . then there is a @xmath43-extension @xmath731 of @xmath50 with extension depth @xmath702 such that @xmath731 is @xmath732complete and such that @xmath731 is an ordered @xmath175-extension of @xmath64 . if @xmath64 is @xmath40-computable , such an @xmath731 and a basis of @xmath733 can be given explicitly . we will show theorem [ thm : algtheoremb ] by induction on the depth @xmath734 . the base case @xmath735 is covered by lemma [ lemma : shortcut].1 ; the proof of lemma [ lemma : shortcut ] is immediate with lemma [ lemma : basiccomplete ] . [ lemma : shortcut ] let @xmath37 be a @xmath3-extension of @xmath64 , let @xmath699 and set @xmath736 . then the following holds . ( 1 ) : : @xmath37 is @xmath737complete . ( 2 ) : : if @xmath738 ( or @xmath739 , @xmath37 is @xmath740complete for all @xmath741 . ( 3 ) : : @xmath14 is @xmath742complete iff @xmath707 . in the following let @xmath716 and let @xmath50 be an ordered @xmath175-extension of @xmath64 ; if @xmath368 , then @xmath730 . _ simplification i. _ note that it suffices to restrict to the case that @xmath390 for @xmath52 . otherwise , let @xmath743 be maximal such that @xmath744 . then we show that there exists such a @xmath43-extension @xmath745 of @xmath746 as required . finally , by proposition [ prop : extensionontop ] we get the desired @xmath175-extension @xmath747 of @xmath64 . the induction step uses another induction on the number of extensions in @xmath5 with depth @xmath734 . the base case and the induction step of this `` internal induction '' are considered in sections [ sec : completephase ] and [ sec : reductionphase ] , respectively . the case @xmath748 ( including @xmath749 ) is covered by the following consideration . _ simplification ii . _ we can assume that @xmath750 by lemma [ lemma : shortcut ] : if we find such a @xmath43-extension @xmath751 of @xmath50 which is @xmath752complete , then @xmath753 , and thus @xmath751 is @xmath754complete for any @xmath741 . with this preparation the following lemma gives the key idea . [ lemma : depthoptbysubprob ] let @xmath716 and let @xmath37 with @xmath755 be an ordered @xmath175-extension of @xmath14 with @xmath756 and @xmath390 for @xmath52 . let @xmath120 and suppose that @xmath37 is @xmath757complete . then any @xmath43-extension @xmath758 of @xmath37 with @xmath759 for @xmath760 is depth - optimal ; in particular , @xmath761 . let @xmath758 be such a @xmath43-extension of @xmath37 with constant field @xmath36 . first note that @xmath761 for all @xmath380 : if there is an @xmath762 with @xmath763 and @xmath764 , then by reordering we get the @xmath43-extension @xmath765 of @xmath37 with extension depth @xmath766 ; a contradiction that @xmath37 is @xmath757complete . now suppose that @xmath767 , @xmath768 , is not depth - optimal with @xmath769 ; set @xmath770 . then there is a @xmath43-extension @xmath771 of @xmath196 with @xmath772 for @xmath773 such that there is a @xmath774 with @xmath775 . the @xmath43-extension @xmath776 of @xmath37 is obtained by reordering ( note that @xmath777 ) . by prop . [ prop : propertiesinpisi].2 , @xmath778 where @xmath294 , @xmath779 . hence @xmath780 for some @xmath470 , i.e. , @xmath37 is not @xmath757complete , a contradiction . namely , by our induction assumption we apply theorem [ thm : algtheoremb ] and take a @xmath43-extension @xmath781 of @xmath50 with extension depth @xmath766 which is an ordered @xmath175-extension @xmath64 and which is @xmath757complete . then we adjoin step by step @xmath43-extensions such that for all @xmath782 there is a @xmath140 with @xmath775 as follows : 1 @xmath783 . for @xmath782 do + 2 if @xmath784 and @xmath785 s.t . @xmath786 then adjoin the @xmath43-extension + @xmath787 of @xmath788 with @xmath789 ; i:=i+1 . fi + 3 od finally , we get a @xmath43-extension , say @xmath790 of @xmath50 ; note that this extension process can be constructed explicitly if @xmath64 is @xmath40-computable . we complete the base case ( of the internal induction ) by the following arguments . @xmath791 : : by lemma [ lemma : depthoptbysubprob ] @xmath790 is an ordered @xmath175-extension of @xmath64 . by prop . [ prop : reorderequaldepth ] we get the @xmath172-extension @xmath792 of @xmath196 with @xmath793 . hence @xmath792 is an ordered @xmath175-extension of @xmath64 . @xmath791 : : since @xmath794 , @xmath792 is @xmath795complete by lemma [ lemma : shortcut ] ; if @xmath64 is @xmath40-computable , a basis of @xmath796 can be given explicitly . [ exp : truncatedh ] take the ordered @xmath175-field @xmath797 over @xmath36 with @xmath798 and ; let @xmath799 . by lemma [ lemma : shortcut2 ] @xmath797 is @xmath715complete . since there is no @xmath800 with @xmath801 , we get the @xmath172-extension @xmath802 of @xmath797 with @xmath803 by lemma [ lemma : depthoptbysubprob ] . by proposition [ prop : reorderequaldepth ] we obtain the ordered @xmath175-field @xmath804 . by construction , @xmath805 , i.e. , @xmath806 . therefore @xmath804 is @xmath807complete . note : since @xmath808 with @xmath809 is an ordered @xmath175-field with @xmath810 , we get the ordered @xmath175-field @xmath811 by proposition [ prop : extensionontop ] . [ exp : truncatedh ] take the ordered @xmath175-field @xmath170 with @xmath812 from example [ exp : truncatedh ] ; let @xmath813 . first note that @xmath170 is @xmath814complete and that there is no @xmath815 with @xmath816 ; see example [ exp : truncatedhsubcom ] . hence we can construct the @xmath172-extension @xmath817 of @xmath170 with @xmath818 ; by reordering we get the ordered @xmath175-field @xmath819 . a basis of @xmath820 is @xmath821 . clearly , @xmath819 is @xmath822complete . we suppose that @xmath823 , i.e. , @xmath824 where @xmath461 is a @xmath175-extension of @xmath196 with @xmath825 and @xmath826 . as above , @xmath827 is a @xmath3-extension of @xmath461 ; in particular with the simplification i : if @xmath368 , then @xmath828 with the following definition and corollary [ cor : polyratext ] we obtain corollary [ cor : completeratcrit ] . let @xmath37 be a @xmath3-extension of @xmath196 with @xmath829 and @xmath830^n_r$ ] . then @xmath37 is _ @xmath831_r)$]complete _ , if for any @xmath3-extension @xmath729 of @xmath37 over @xmath5 with extension depth @xmath702 we have @xmath832_r})}={{\rm v}({\boldsymbol{f}},{{\mathbb{h}}[t]_r})}$ ] . [ cor : completeratcrit ] let @xmath716 and let @xmath827 be a @xmath3-extension of @xmath196 with @xmath833 ; if @xmath368 , then . let @xmath465 , and define @xmath519 and @xmath516 by . let @xmath506 be a basis of @xmath474 and set @xmath464 . ( 1 ) : : if @xmath480 , @xmath827 is @xmath834complete ; @xmath835 . otherwise : ( 2 ) : : take @xmath491^m , b$ ] by , . if @xmath836 is a @xmath3-extension of @xmath781 that is @xmath837_b,{\mathfrak{d}})$]-complete , @xmath836 is @xmath838-complete . if @xmath645 is a basis of @xmath839_b})}$ ] , a basis of @xmath244 can be constructed by remark [ rem : ratdetails ] . [ exp : truncatedfullrat ] consider the ordered @xmath175-field @xmath350 with @xmath840 and ; let @xmath503 . as in example [ exp : truncatednaiverat ] we get @xmath504 , @xmath505 , @xmath841 , @xmath842 and @xmath573 . in examples [ exp : truncatedfullpoly ] and [ exp : truncatedfullpoly2 ] we will construct the @xmath43-extension @xmath843 of @xmath350 with @xmath844 and where @xmath843 is an ordered @xmath175-field which is @xmath845_2)$]complete ; we obtain the basis @xmath846 of @xmath847_2)})}$ ] . hence @xmath843 is @xmath848-complete by corollary [ cor : completeratcrit ] ; a basis of @xmath849 is @xmath645 . let @xmath617 and set @xmath850 and @xmath527^m_r$ ] . define @xmath613 as in . if @xmath45 is a @xmath44-extension , we can apply corollary [ cor : makecomplete ] ( see below ) and obtain the reduction @xmath851 . otherwise , if @xmath45 is a @xmath43-extension , the following preprocessing step is necessary . by the induction assumption we can apply theorem [ thm : algtheoremb ] and get a @xmath43-extension of @xmath852 with extension depth @xmath766 which can be brought to an ordered @xmath175-extension @xmath853 of @xmath64 and which is @xmath854complete . by proposition [ prop : extensionontop ] we can adjoin the extensions @xmath855 on top and get the ordered @xmath175-extension @xmath856 of @xmath64 . now we are ready apply corollary [ cor : makecomplete ] ( @xmath857 is replaced by @xmath51 ) and proceed with the reduction @xmath851 . [ cor : makecomplete ] let @xmath716 and let @xmath827 be a @xmath3-extension of @xmath64 with @xmath833 ; if @xmath368 , then . let @xmath836 be a @xmath3-extension of @xmath827 with extension depth @xmath702 . let @xmath531 and @xmath684^m_r$ ] , and define @xmath613 and @xmath616 as in and . ( 1 ) @xmath687 : : : if @xmath196 is @xmath858complete and in addition @xmath836 is @xmath859_{r-1},{\mathfrak{d}})$]complete , then @xmath836 is @xmath860_r,{\mathfrak{d}})$]complete . + if @xmath561 and @xmath557 are bases of @xmath861 and @xmath862_{r-1}})}$ ] , respectively , we get a basis of @xmath863_r})}$ ] following remark [ rem : polytechnical ] . ( 2 ) @xmath864 : : : if @xmath836 is @xmath859_{r-1},{\mathfrak{d}})$]-complete , then it follows that @xmath836 is @xmath865_r,{\mathfrak{d}})$]complete . if @xmath561 and @xmath557 are bases of the solution spaces @xmath614 and @xmath862_{r-1}})}$ ] , respectively , we get a basis of @xmath863_r})}$ ] following remark [ rem : polytechnical ] . let @xmath37 be a @xmath3-extension of @xmath866 with extension depth @xmath734 . reorder it to @xmath867 with @xmath868 for @xmath722 and @xmath869 for @xmath681 . then by corollary [ cor : incremredref ] @xmath870 . summarizing , we obtain a reduction for @xmath871 , which can be illustrated in figure [ fig : polydepthred ] . @xmath872\txt{return\\ $ ( { \mathbb{h}}'_{r}(t)(t_1,\dots , t_e),b_r)$}&*+[f=]{\txt{task : find an $ ( { \boldsymbol{f_r}},{\mathfrak{d}},{\mathbb{h}}'_{r})$--complete { $ \sigma^*$}-extension\\ $ { ( { { \mathbb{h}}'_r(t)(t_1)\dots(t_e)},{\sigma})}$ of $ { ( { { \mathbb{h}}_{r}(t)(t_1)\dots(t_e)},{\sigma})}$ with\\ extension depth $ \leq{\mathfrak{d}}$ which is an ordered { $ \pi\sigma^{\delta}$}-ex-\\ tension of $ { ( { { \mathbb{g}}},{\sigma})}$ ; find a basis $ b_r$ of $ { { \rm v}({\boldsymbol{f_r}},{{\mathbb{h}}'_r[t]_r})}$.}}\ar[d]&*+[f-,]\txt{return\\ $ ( { \mathbb{h}}_{r}(t)(t_1,\dots , t_e)$,\\ $ \{{(\begin{smallmatrix}{0,\dots,0,1}\end{smallmatrix})}\})$}\\ * + [ f.]\txt{combine $ b_{r-1}$ , $ \tilde{b}_r$\\ to a basis $ b_r$ of $ { \mathbb{v}}_{r}$.}\ar@{.>}[u]&*+[f-:<3pt>]\txt{set $ { \boldsymbol{\tilde{f}_r}}$ by~\eqref{equ : defineftilde}}\ar[r]&*+[f--]\txt{{\bf solve problem~{{\sf ce } } } } \ar@{.>}@/^1.pc/[ll]|{\tilde{b}_r}\ar[u]^<(0.26){\tilde{b}_r=\{\}}\ar[d]^{\tilde{b}_r\neq\{\}}\\ & * + [ f=]{\txt{task : find an $ ( { \boldsymbol{f_{r-1}}},{\mathfrak{d}},{\mathbb{h}}'_{r-1})$--complete { $ \sigma^*$}-extension\\ $ { ( { { \mathbb{h}}'_{r-1}(t)(t_1)\dots(t_e)},{\sigma})}$ of $ { ( { { \mathbb{h}}_{r-1}(t)(t_1)\dots(t_e)},{\sigma})}$ with\\ extension depth $ \leq{\mathfrak{d}}$ which is an ordered { $ \pi\sigma^{\delta}$}-extension\\ of $ { ( { { \mathbb{g}}},{\sigma})}$ ; find a basis $ b_{r-1}$ of $ { { \rm v}({\boldsymbol{f_{r-1}}},{{\mathbb{h}}'_{r-1}[t]_{r-1}})}$.}}\ar@{.>}@/^2pc/[lu]|<(.33){b_{r-1 } } & * + [ f-:<3pt>]\txt{set $ { \boldsymbol{f_{r-1}}}$ by~\eqref{equ : definefdeltam}}\ar[l ] } \ ] ] [ exp : truncatedfullpoly ] we continue the reduction from example [ exp : truncatedfullrat ] with @xmath573 . @xmath573 : : : set @xmath873 . by we get @xmath574 . clearly , @xmath196 is @xmath874complete with the basis @xmath576 of @xmath575 . @xmath577 : : : we get @xmath875 by and @xmath579 by . we can construct the @xmath43-extension @xmath595 with @xmath137 which gives the ordered @xmath175-field @xmath876 and which is @xmath877complete ; a basis of @xmath878 is @xmath879 ; see example [ exp : truncatedsub ] . this gives @xmath880 . if @xmath530 , we need a @xmath43-extension @xmath881 of @xmath882 with extension depth @xmath702 which is an ordered @xmath175-extension of @xmath64 and which is @xmath883complete . [ exp : truncatedfullpoly2 ] we continue example [ exp : truncatedfullpoly ] for the case @xmath530 . by ex . [ exp : truncatedh ] we get the ordered @xmath175-field @xmath843 with @xmath884 which is @xmath885complete ; a basis of @xmath886 is @xmath887 . hence we obtain the bases @xmath888 of @xmath889 and @xmath890 of @xmath891 . note that @xmath609 is a vector in @xmath892 which is a smaller field in the following sense : @xmath893 is a @xmath43-extension of @xmath196 with extension depth @xmath766 , but the extension @xmath45 with @xmath894 is eliminated ( it pops up in the tower @xmath895 above ) . eventually , all extensions with depth @xmath734 are eliminated , and we get a difference field with depth @xmath896 ; see section [ sec : completephase ] . [ exp : truncatedsub ] we are given the ordered @xmath175-field @xmath897 over @xmath36 with @xmath898 and @xmath899 . following figure [ fig : ratred ] we get @xmath842 . the degree bound is @xmath900 by . we start the reduction of figure [ fig : polydepthred ] with @xmath577 , set @xmath901 , and get @xmath902 by . a basis of @xmath903 is @xmath904 . hence @xmath905 by . now we need an ordered @xmath175-field @xmath906 which is a @xmath43-extension of @xmath897 with extension depth @xmath907 and which is @xmath908complete ; note that @xmath643 is eliminated . by example [ exp : truncatedh ] we get the @xmath175-field @xmath906 with @xmath909 and the basis @xmath910 of @xmath911 . completing the reduction , we get the basis @xmath912 of @xmath913 . by construction , @xmath906 is @xmath814complete . we sum up the construction from above : the derived @xmath172-extensions are defined by entries of some vectors @xmath723 which occur within the reduction process ; see section [ sec : completephase ] . internally , those vectors @xmath723 are determined by the reduction presented in figure [ fig : ratred ] ( the rational reduction ) and figure [ fig : polydepthred ] ( the polynomial reduction ) . exploiting additional properties in difference fields , we can predict how the @xmath723 and therefore the derived @xmath172-extensions look like . the first result is needed in lemma [ lemma : swapxy ] . [ cor : nopiext ] let @xmath914 be a @xmath3-extension of @xmath64 with @xmath915 such that @xmath914 can be brought to an ordered @xmath175-extension of @xmath64 ; let @xmath699 and @xmath704 . then there is a @xmath43-extension of @xmath914 over @xmath5 with extension depth @xmath702 which can be brought to an ordered @xmath175-extension of @xmath64 and which is @xmath700complete . if @xmath916 , the corollary follows by theorem [ thm : algtheoremb ] and proposition [ prop : propertiesinpisi].2 . let @xmath917 . we refine the inductive proof in section [ sec : constructdeltaext ] . suppose that the reduction holds for @xmath896 . as in section [ sec : constructdeltaext ] we assume that @xmath50 is a @xmath3-extension of @xmath64 ; if @xmath368 , then . now reorder @xmath914 to an ordered @xmath175-extension @xmath213 of @xmath64 . if @xmath918 , we construct a @xmath43-extension over @xmath5 as required ; see section [ sec : completephase ] . if @xmath919 , set @xmath824 with @xmath825 as in section [ sec : reductionphase ] with @xmath306 ; note that @xmath920 , since @xmath917 . then by corollary [ cor : completeratcrit ] @xmath491^m$ ] . define @xmath643 by and set @xmath612 , @xmath850 . now we apply the reduction as given in figure [ fig : polydepthred ] . since @xmath613 is free of @xmath459 , we can apply the induction assumption : we can take as required a @xmath43-extension @xmath853 of @xmath921 where the new @xmath43-extensions do not depend on @xmath459 . note that @xmath922 is free of @xmath459 by proposition [ prop : propertiesinpisi].2 ( if @xmath45 is a @xmath43-extension ) or lemma [ lemma : noextforpi ] ( if @xmath45 is a @xmath44-extension ) . hence @xmath616 is free of @xmath459 . suppose we reach the base case ( after at most @xmath262 steps ) with @xmath923 , free of @xmath459 , where @xmath924 is a @xmath43-extension of @xmath827 which is free of @xmath459 . by the reduction of the extensions with depth @xmath925 , the corollary follows . corollary [ cor : polyext ] can be shown completely analogously by using the following lemma [ lemma : polyclosure ] . [ lemma : polyclosure ] let @xmath781 be a polynomial @xmath3-extension of @xmath196 . for all @xmath926 $ ] , @xmath927 $ ] iff @xmath926 $ ] . [ cor : polyext ] let @xmath781 be an ordered @xmath175-extension of @xmath64 with @xmath928 and @xmath929 such that the @xmath172-extension @xmath781 of @xmath196 is polynomial ; + let @xmath930^n$ ] and @xmath704 . ( 1 ) : : then there is @xmath43-extension @xmath931 of @xmath781 with @xmath932 for @xmath380 and @xmath933 which can be brought to an ordered @xmath175-extension of @xmath64 and which is @xmath700complete . ( 2 ) : : in particular , the extension @xmath931 of @xmath866 is polynomial . ( 3 ) : : we have @xmath934[t_1,\dots , t_e]$ ] . ( 4 ) : : it can be constructed explicitly , if @xmath64 is @xmath40-computable . consider the polynomial @xmath175-extension @xmath99 of @xmath86 with and let @xmath935 $ ] . by corollary [ cor : polyext ] our construction will always yield a @xmath43-extension @xmath37 of @xmath99 with @xmath936 where @xmath37 is a polynomial @xmath3-extension of @xmath86 ; in particular , any solution @xmath140 of is in @xmath937[s_1,\dots , s_r]$ ] . the building blocks from above can be summarized to algorithm [ alg : multiplesolvesolutionspace ] . [ alg : multiplesolvesolutionspace ] solving problem . ` finddepthcompleteext`(@xmath938 ) an ordered @xmath175-extension @xmath50 of a @xmath40-computable @xmath64 , @xmath699 , @xmath704 . a @xmath43-extension @xmath731 of @xmath50 s.t . @xmath731 is an ordered + @xmath175-extension of @xmath64 and is @xmath732complete ; a basis of @xmath939 . [ alg : basecase ] if @xmath735 or . ] ( @xmath940 and @xmath177 and @xmath70 for some @xmath713 ) then compute a basis @xmath463 of @xmath941 ; return @xmath942 . fi if @xmath393 and @xmath943 then let @xmath743 be minimal such that @xmath744 . execute @xmath944=`finddepthcompleteext`(@xmath945 ) . return @xmath946 fi if @xmath756 then @xmath947 [ alg : subext ] let . ] @xmath948=`finddepthcompleteext`(@xmath949 ) [ alg : extcommand]construct a @xmath43-extension @xmath792 of @xmath781 and a basis @xmath950 of + @xmath796 as in sec . [ sec : completephase ] . return @xmath951 fi let @xmath952 with @xmath953 ; if @xmath368 , then . [ alg : redphasestart ] follow the rational reduction as in figure [ fig : ratred ] . let @xmath506 be a basis of @xmath954 . if @xmath480 , then return @xmath955 fi [ alg : subext2 ] take @xmath491^m$ ] , @xmath643 by and . apply the polynomial reduction and @xmath531 , ce is solved by @xmath956:=`finddepthcompleteext`(@xmath957 . ] from figure [ fig : polydepthred ] for @xmath958 . if the reduction stops earlier , return the corresponding result . otherwise , take @xmath609 with the computed ordered @xmath175-extension @xmath924 of @xmath64 . [ alg : keepdepth ] execute @xmath959:=`finddepthcompleteext`(@xmath960 ) . [ alg : redphaseend ] finish the reductions from figures [ fig : polydepthred ] and [ fig : ratred ] ; let @xmath950 be the basis of @xmath961 . return @xmath962 . now suppose that we remove lines [ alg : subext ] and [ alg : extcommand ] and return instead @xmath963 where @xmath463 is a basis of @xmath941 . then this modified version of algorithm [ alg : multiplesolvesolutionspace ] boils down to the recursive reduction presented in section [ sec : reduction ] ; see remark [ rem : ratpolyred ] . in other words , the execution of lines [ alg : subext ] and [ alg : extcommand ] is the heart of our new algorithm . in the sequel , we will optimize this part further . for this task we will refine the reduction phase ( lines [ alg : redphasestart][alg : redphaseend ] ) as follows . let @xmath50 be a @xmath3-extension of @xmath14 over @xmath5 with @xmath964 for @xmath52 and @xmath756 ; moreover let @xmath965 and let @xmath966 . note : by executing ` finddepthcompleteext`(@xmath967 ) it calls itself with depth @xmath734 in line [ alg : keepdepth ] ; for all other recursive calls ( in line [ alg : subext2 ] , see footnote ) we use depth @xmath766 . finally , if we enter the completion phase ( lines [ alg : subext ] and [ alg : extcommand ] ) with depth @xmath734 we can assume that @xmath246 contains all the elements @xmath54 for @xmath968 . this follows by lemmata [ lemma : entriesingroundfield ] and [ lemma : entriesinpolcase ] . given such a refined reduction , we can simplify the completion phase as follows . [ lemma : basismani ] let @xmath37 be a @xmath3-extension of @xmath14 over @xmath5 with @xmath290 such that @xmath964 for @xmath52 and @xmath756 ; let @xmath20 and @xmath965 . let @xmath699 where the the last @xmath969 entries are @xmath291 for @xmath968 . then : ( 1 ) : : if @xmath14 is @xmath757complete , then @xmath37 is @xmath757complete . ( 2 ) : : if a basis of @xmath941 is given , by row - operations in @xmath970 over @xmath36 one can construct a @xmath43-extension @xmath758 of @xmath37 s.t . @xmath758 is @xmath971complete ; a basis of @xmath972 can be extracted with no extra cost . * ( 1 ) * suppose that @xmath37 is not @xmath757complete . then there is a @xmath43-extension @xmath381 of @xmath14 with @xmath973 and @xmath470 such that @xmath974 . by proposition [ prop : propertiesinpisi ] , @xmath975 for some @xmath976 and @xmath977 . thus there is @xmath978 such that @xmath979 and therefore @xmath14 is not @xmath757complete . + * ( 2 ) * suppose that the entries @xmath980 with @xmath968 occur in the last @xmath981 entries of @xmath246 ; in particular suppose that they are sorted in the order as the corresponding extensions @xmath855 occur in @xmath4 . take a basis of @xmath941 and apply row operations such that one gets a basis @xmath982 where @xmath983 is in reduced form . if @xmath615 is the identity matrix , @xmath37 is @xmath984complete by lemma [ lemma : shortcut].2 and we are done . + otherwise , let @xmath985 be the set of all integers @xmath986 such that the @xmath28th column does not have a corner element in @xmath615 . suppose that @xmath987 with @xmath988 . now consider the difference field @xmath758 extension of @xmath37 where @xmath989 is a rational function field and for all @xmath990 we have @xmath991 . we prove that this is a @xmath43-extension which is @xmath984complete . + let @xmath992 be minimal such that @xmath993 is not a @xmath43-extension . then there is a @xmath994 with @xmath995 . hence , by proposition [ prop : propertiesinpisi ] , @xmath996 with @xmath295,@xmath997 . hence @xmath998 for some @xmath999 ; thus @xmath1000 where 1 is at the @xmath1001th position . since @xmath615 is in row reduced form and the @xmath1001th position has no corner entry , we can not generate @xmath1002 ; a contradiction that @xmath463 is a basis . hence @xmath758 is a @xmath43-extension of @xmath37 . + we get besides @xmath463 the solutions @xmath1003 where the @xmath900 is at the @xmath1001th position and @xmath1004 where the @xmath900 is at the @xmath1005th position . since the @xmath249 elements in @xmath1006 are lin.independent , @xmath758 is @xmath984complete by lemma [ lemma : shortcut ] . clearly , @xmath1007 is a basis of @xmath972 . * crucial improvements . * the first consequence is that we can replace line [ alg : subext ] by executing the function call @xmath1008 then by prop . [ prop : extensionontop ] we get an ordered @xmath175-extension @xmath781 of @xmath64 . moreover , by lemma [ lemma : basismani].1 @xmath781 is complete , as needed in lemma [ lemma : depthoptbysubprob ] . finally , by lemma [ lemma : basismani].2 we simplify the construction of step [ alg : extcommand ] as follows : by analyzing the basis @xmath463 of @xmath1009 , that has been computed already in step [ alg : subext ] , we get a @xmath43-extension of @xmath1010 of @xmath64 which can be brought to an ordered @xmath175-extension @xmath1011 and which is @xmath1012complete ; we extract a basis of @xmath796 . [ exp : truncatedhsubcom ] in example [ exp : truncatedh ] we claim that @xmath170 with @xmath812 is @xmath814complete where @xmath813 . note that @xmath1013 . hence by lemma [ lemma : basismani].1 it suffices to show that @xmath14 is @xmath814complete . with our algorithm this can be easily checked ; during this check we get the basis @xmath1014 of @xmath941 . following the proof of lemma [ lemma : basismani].2 , @xmath817 is a @xmath43-extension of @xmath170 with @xmath1015 and we get the basis @xmath1016 of @xmath1017 . by lemma [ lemma : depthoptbysubprob ] @xmath1018 is depth - optimal . we emphasize that the modified algorithm differs from the reduction presented in section [ sec : reduction ] ( which is similar to karr s algorithm ) by just analyzing the sub - results and by inserting extensions if necessary . _ in a nutshell , running our new algorithm which computes an appropriate @xmath175-extension and which outputs the corresponding solution to problem pt is not more expensive than choosing such a @xmath175-extension manually and solving problem pt with the recursive algorithm from section [ sec : reduction ] ( or karr s algorithm ) . on the contrary , adjoining the extensions only when it is required during the reduction keeps the computations as simple and therefore as cheap as possible . _ we need the following preparation to prove result [ res : reordering ] . [ lemma : pinotneeded ] let @xmath914 be a @xmath44-extension of @xmath14 which can be brought to an ordered @xmath175-extension of @xmath64 . let @xmath7 and let @xmath37 be a @xmath43-extension of @xmath14 with extension depth @xmath734 and @xmath174 such that . then there is a @xmath43-extension @xmath195 of @xmath14 with extension depth @xmath702 and @xmath1019 such that @xmath349 and @xmath1020 . write @xmath1021 with @xmath1022 . since we can bring @xmath914 to an ordered @xmath175-extension of @xmath64 , we can apply corollary [ cor : nopiext ] : there is a @xmath43-extension @xmath195 of @xmath914 over @xmath5 with @xmath1023 which can be brought to an ordered @xmath175-extension of @xmath64 and in which we have @xmath1019 s.t . @xmath349 ; by proposition [ prop : propertiesinpisi].2 , @xmath1024 . by theorem [ thm : constructsigmaextontopordered ] we can take a @xmath43-extension @xmath1025 of @xmath195 and an @xmath1026-monomorphism @xmath1027 s.t . for all @xmath1028 . note that @xmath1029 . since @xmath1030 , @xmath1031 for some @xmath1032 therefore , @xmath1033 . since @xmath1034 for @xmath380 , @xmath1035 . by construction , @xmath1036 is a @xmath43-extension of @xmath14 with extension depth @xmath702 . [ lemma : swapxy ] let @xmath1037 be a @xmath175-extension of @xmath14 and suppose that @xmath366 and @xmath914 can be brought to ordered @xmath175-extensions of @xmath64 . then the @xmath3-extension @xmath1038 of @xmath14 is depth - optimal . first we show that @xmath914 is a @xmath175-extension of @xmath14 . if @xmath459 is a @xmath44-extension , we are done . otherwise , let @xmath459 be a @xmath43-extension with @xmath441 which is not depth - optimal . hence , we can take a @xmath43-extension @xmath1039 of @xmath14 with extension depth @xmath173 and @xmath286 such that . there are two cases . + * case 1a : * @xmath277 is a @xmath44-extension . by corollary [ cor : extendpioversigma ] @xmath1040 is a @xmath44-extension of @xmath1039 . by reordering , @xmath1041 is a @xmath43-extension of @xmath366 . consequently , @xmath1037 is not a @xmath172-extension of @xmath366 , a contradiction . + * case 1b : * @xmath277 is a @xmath43-extension . bring @xmath366 to an ordered @xmath175-extension @xmath195 of @xmath64 . hence , by thm . [ thm : constructsigmaextontopordered ] there is a @xmath43-extension @xmath37 of @xmath195 with extension depth @xmath173 and an @xmath5-monomorphism @xmath1042 with @xmath1043 . since @xmath1044 ( as fields ) , @xmath1037 is not a @xmath172-extension of @xmath366 ; a contradiction . second , we show that @xmath1038 is a @xmath175-extension of @xmath914 . if @xmath277 is a @xmath44-extension , we are done . otherwise , let @xmath277 be a @xmath43-extension . if @xmath459 is a @xmath43-extension and @xmath1045 , the statement follows by lemma [ lemma : shiftsumtoleft ] and by proposition [ prop : reorderequaldepth ] . what remains to consider are the cases that @xmath459 is a @xmath44-extension or that @xmath459 is a @xmath43-extension with @xmath1046 . now suppose that @xmath1038 is a @xmath43-extension of @xmath914 with @xmath1047 which is not depth - optimal . hence , we can take a @xmath43-extension @xmath1048 of @xmath914 with extension depth @xmath173 and @xmath1049 such that . + * case 2a : * @xmath459 is a @xmath44-extension . by lemma [ lemma : pinotneeded ] , there is a @xmath43-extension @xmath195 of @xmath14 with extension depth @xmath173 and @xmath1019 such that @xmath349 ; hence @xmath366 is not a @xmath172-extension of @xmath14 , a contradiction . + * case 2b : * @xmath459 is a @xmath43-extension with @xmath1050 . reorder @xmath914 to a @xmath175-extension of @xmath64 . by theorem [ thm : depthstableordered ] @xmath1051 . since @xmath1052 , @xmath140 is free of @xmath459 . hence , @xmath1039 is a @xmath43-extension of @xmath14 with @xmath286 such that , and therefore @xmath366 is not a @xmath172-extension of @xmath14 ; a contradiction . @xmath791 * result [ res : reordering ] . * if @xmath1053 nothing has to be shown . let @xmath1054 be a @xmath175-extension of @xmath64 with @xmath393 and suppose the theorem holds for @xmath393 extension . choose any possible reordering . if @xmath277 stays on top , by the induction assumption all extensions below are depth - optimal . @xmath277 remains depth - optimal , since the field below has not changed . this shows this case . otherwise , suppose that @xmath855 for some @xmath52 is on top . then we can reorder our field to the @xmath3-extension @xmath1055 of @xmath64 with @xmath1056 . by the induction assumption we can bring @xmath1057 and @xmath272 to ordered @xmath175-extensions of @xmath64 . thus , we can apply lemma [ lemma : swapxy ] and get the @xmath175-extension @xmath1058 of @xmath64 . by the induction assumption we can bring the extensions in @xmath51 to the desired order without changing the @xmath175-property . @xmath791 * result [ res : depthconstruct ] . * this follows by theorem [ thm : extendforteleordered ] , corollary [ cor : polyext ] and result [ res : reordering ] . in particular , @xmath37 and @xmath174 can be computed as follows . 1reorder @xmath14 to an ordered @xmath3-extension of @xmath64 . + 2execute @xmath1059:=`finddepthcompleteext`(@xmath1060 ) and extract @xmath140 from @xmath463 s.t . . @xmath791 * result [ res : depthstable ] . * this is a direct consequence of theorem [ thm : depthstableordered ] and result [ res : reordering ] . @xmath791 * result [ res : constructsigmaextontop ] . * this follows by theorem [ thm : constructsigmaextontopordered ] and result [ res : reordering ] . @xmath791 * result [ res : extensiondepthstable ] . * this is implied by the following more general statement : there is a @xmath43-extension @xmath195 of @xmath37 and a @xmath175-extension @xmath422 of @xmath14 with an @xmath5-isomorphism @xmath1061 as in for all @xmath1028 ; we can assume that @xmath4 is ordered . + we prove this result by induction on the number of extensions in @xmath4 . for @xmath1062 , take @xmath1063 and @xmath1064 with @xmath1065 . now suppose we have shown the result for @xmath1066 with @xmath393 . i.e. , we are given a @xmath175-extension @xmath422 of @xmath14 , a @xmath43-extension @xmath195 of @xmath37 with @xmath1067 and an @xmath5-isomorphism @xmath1061 as in for all @xmath1028 . let @xmath1068 be a @xmath3-extension of @xmath37 with @xmath1069 . case 1 : * suppose that @xmath45 is a @xmath44-extension with @xmath1070 . then by corollary [ cor : extendpioversigma ] we can construct the @xmath44-extension @xmath282 of @xmath195 . moreover , by proposition [ prop : homproperties].2 we can construct the @xmath44-extension @xmath1071 of @xmath422 with @xmath1072 and can extend the @xmath5-isomorphism @xmath205 to @xmath1073 with @xmath1074 . by reordering , we get the @xmath43-extension @xmath1075 of @xmath1068 with the @xmath5-isomorphism @xmath1076 . as @xmath1077 , it follows that @xmath1078 . hence for all @xmath1079 . + * case 2 : * suppose that @xmath45 is a @xmath43-extension with @xmath1080 . we consider two subcases + * case 2a : * if there is a @xmath712 with @xmath1081 , let @xmath659 be minimal such that @xmath1082 . then by theorem [ thm : pisigma].1 there is the @xmath43-extension @xmath1083 of @xmath1084 with @xmath1080 . furthermore , there is an @xmath1085-isomorphism @xmath1086 with @xmath1087 by prop . [ prop : homproperties].1 . by reordering we get the @xmath43-extension @xmath1088 of @xmath1068 . now we can construct a @xmath43-extension @xmath1025 of @xmath1088 with an @xmath1089-isomorphism @xmath1090 by prop . [ prop : homproperties].3 . hence we arrive at an @xmath5-isomorphism @xmath1091 with @xmath1092 . finally , observe that for all @xmath1028 we have @xmath1093 and @xmath1094 . since @xmath1095 , @xmath1096 by result [ res : depthstable ] . with @xmath1097 it follows that @xmath1098 . since @xmath1099 for all @xmath1028 , we get @xmath1100 for all @xmath1079 . + * case 2b : * suppose that there is no @xmath712 with @xmath1081 . then there is no @xmath1101 with @xmath1102 . by result [ res : depthconstruct ] there is a @xmath172-extension @xmath1103 of @xmath422 such that @xmath1102 for some @xmath1104 . moreover , by proposition [ prop : homproperties].3 it follows that there is a @xmath43-extension @xmath1105 of @xmath195 and an @xmath5-isomorphism @xmath1106 where @xmath311 for all @xmath1028 . furthermore , we can construct the @xmath43-extension @xmath1107 of @xmath1105 with @xmath1080 by proposition [ prop : propertiesinpisi].1 . finally , we can construct the @xmath5-isomorphism @xmath1108 with @xmath1109 for all @xmath1110 and @xmath1111 by proposition [ prop : homproperties].1 . by reordering of @xmath1112 we obtain the @xmath43-extension @xmath1025 of @xmath1068 with @xmath1113 . as above , @xmath1114 . since @xmath1115 for all @xmath1028 , @xmath1116 for all @xmath1028 . thus @xmath1116 for all @xmath1079 . + note that this construction can be given explicitly , if @xmath64 is @xmath40-computable . @xmath791 * result [ res : prodfree ] . * the induction base @xmath285 is obvious . suppose result [ res : prodfree ] holds for @xmath359 extensions , and consider a @xmath3-extension @xmath1117 of @xmath14 with @xmath1118 s.t . . then by assumption there is a @xmath172-extension @xmath1119 of @xmath376 with @xmath1120 such that @xmath1121 and @xmath349 . now we apply result [ res : extensiondepthstable ] ( if @xmath327 is a @xmath43-extension ) and lemma [ lemma : pinotneeded ] together with result [ res : extensiondepthstable ] ( if @xmath327 is a @xmath44-extension ) : it follows that there is a @xmath172-extension @xmath195 of @xmath14 with @xmath1122 s.t . @xmath1123 and @xmath1124 . since @xmath1125 , we are done . @xmath791 * result [ res : prodsumdef ] . * this is a direct consequence of results [ res : depthconstruct ] and [ res : prodfree ] . @xmath791 * result [ res : dot ] . * let @xmath37 be such a @xmath172-extension of @xmath14 with @xmath20 ; take @xmath174 as in . * ( 1 ) * let @xmath196 be a @xmath3-extension of @xmath14 with @xmath348 s.t . @xmath349 . by result [ res : prodfree ] there is a @xmath172-extension @xmath195 of @xmath14 with @xmath1126 and @xmath1127 such that @xmath1128 and @xmath1129 . by result [ res : constructsigmaextontop ] we get a @xmath172-extension @xmath312 of @xmath37 and an @xmath5-monomorphism @xmath1130 as in for all @xmath1131 . hence @xmath1132 . since @xmath1133 and @xmath1134 , @xmath1135 for some @xmath1136 . hence @xmath1137 . + * ( 2 ) * suppose in addition that @xmath1138 and @xmath1139 . by the above considerations , @xmath1140 for @xmath380 and @xmath1135 for some @xmath1136 . hence there is an @xmath383 with @xmath380 s.t . @xmath1141 occurs in @xmath1142 . hence @xmath1143 . @xmath791 * result [ res : paratele ] . * by theorem [ thm : algtheorema ] we can take a @xmath172-extension @xmath37 of @xmath14 which is @xmath700complete . now let @xmath196 be any @xmath3-extension of @xmath14 with extension depth @xmath702 and @xmath374 , @xmath470 s.t . . then by results [ res : depthconstruct ] and [ res : dot].1 we take a @xmath172-extension @xmath195 of @xmath14 with @xmath1019 such that @xmath1144 and @xmath1121 . moreover , by result [ res : constructsigmaextontop ] we take a @xmath43-extension @xmath312 of @xmath37 with extension depth @xmath702 and an @xmath5-monomorphism @xmath1130 s.t . @xmath1145 for @xmath1146 . since @xmath1128 and @xmath37 is @xmath700complete , @xmath1147 ; in particular , @xmath1148 . @xmath37 can be constructed explicitly : 1reorder @xmath14 to an ordered @xmath3-extension of @xmath64 . + 2@xmath1059:=`finddepthcompleteext`(@xmath1149 ) . we conclude our article by non - trivial applications from particle physics @xcite . for the computations we used the summation package sigma @xcite which contains in its inner core our new difference field theory . in massive higher order calculations of feynman diagrams @xcite the sum @xmath1150 where @xmath1151 denotes the beta function @xcite , arose . it turns out that our refined creative telescoping method produces analogous to example [ equ : creasol] a recurrence with minimal order : @xmath1152 note that standard creative telescoping produces a recurrence of order @xmath1153 only ; see @xcite . given this optimal recurrence of order @xmath900 , the closed form denotes the riemann zeta function at @xmath28 ; e.g. , @xmath1154 . ] @xmath1155\\ & -2\tfrac{s_3(n)-\zeta_3}{n+2 } -\tfrac{s_2(n)-\zeta_2}{n+2}s_1(n ) + \tfrac{2 + 7n+7n^2 + 5n^3+n^4 } { n^3(n+1)^3(n+2)}s_1(n ) + 2\tfrac{2 + 7n+9n^2 + 4n^3+n^4 } { n^4(n+1)^3(n+2 ) } \end{split}\ ] ] can be read off immediately . + we remark that in this example the algebraic object @xmath1156 occurs which can not be handled in a direct fashion in @xmath3-fields . as it turns out , our algorithmic framework can be slightly extended such that it works also in this case ; the technical details are omitted here . as worked out in @xcite sigma could reproduce the evaluation of a feynman diagram that occurred in @xcite during the computation of the third - order qcd corrections to deep - inelastic scattering by photon exchange . more precisely , in mellin space the related feynman diagram could be expressed in terms of the recurrence @xmath1160 \underbrace{-\frac{1}{n+1}\sum_{k=4}^n(-1)^k\underbrace{\sum_{j=4}^k\frac{(-1)^j ( 3 j-2)}{(j-2 ) ( j-1 ) j}\overbrace{\sum_{i=4}^j\frac{f(i-3)}{(3 i-5 ) ( 3 i-2)}}^{=a(j)}}_{=b(k)}}_{=c(n)}$$\end{gathered}\ ] ] for constants @xmath1161 . checking initial values shows that @xmath1162 , @xmath1163 and @xmath1164 . now the main task is to simplify further . with , e.g. , karr s algorithm @xcite the inner sum @xmath1165 can be eliminated and one gets a rather big expression for @xmath1165 in terms of single nested harmonic sums @xmath1166 . in other words , we obtain an expression for where the depth is reduced by one . to get a representation with optimal nested depth , we execute our refined algorithm ; the result is an expression for @xmath1167 in terms of two nested sum expressions only : @xmath1168 note that the depth optimality of the sum representation is justified by results from @xcite . finally , splitting these sums by partial fraction decomposition , we get the solution @xcite : @xmath1169 & + s_2(n ) \big(\frac{4 s_3(n)}{n+1}-\frac{4 \zeta_3 } { n+1}\big)+s_{-3}(n ) \big(\frac{8(1+(-1)^n)}{n^2 ( n+1)}-\frac{4(2+(-1)^n ) s_{-2}(n)}{n+1}\\ & -\frac{4 s_2(n)}{n+1}\big)+s_{-2}(n ) \big(\frac{-12 \zeta_3 n^3+(-1)^n ( 8 - 8 n^3 \zeta_3)+8}{n^3 ( n+1)}-\frac{(4 + 8 ( -1)^n ) s_3(n)}{n+1}\big)\\[-0.1 cm ] & + \frac{8 s_{-3,-2}(n)}{n+1}+ \frac{(4 - 4(-1)^n)s_{-3,2}(n)}{n+1}+\frac{(4 + 12 ( -1)^n ) s_{-2,3}(n)}{n+1}-\frac{8s_{2,3}(n)}{n+1}.\end{aligned}\ ] ] for further examples how one can simplify dalembertian solutions @xcite with our algorithms see , e.g. , @xcite . we note that in the derived result no algebraic relations between the harmonic sums occur . in the next section we show how sigma eliminates , or equivalently , finds such algebraic relations explicitly and efficiently . during the calculation of feynman integrals harmonic sums arise frequently ; see , for instance , @xcite for further literature . in order to derive compact representations of such computations , one can use , e.g. , results from @xcite where all relations of harmonic sums are classified in general and tabulated up to nested depth @xmath1170 . alternatively , we illustrate how this task can be handled efficiently in the general @xmath175-field setting . consider , e.g. , the sums @xmath1171 , @xmath1172 , @xmath1173 , @xmath1174 , @xmath1175 , @xmath1176 , @xmath1177 which are algebraically independent except the last one : here the relation @xmath1178 pops up . with the naive reduction from section [ sec : reduction ] , sigma finds by representing the sums in a @xmath3-field @xmath1179 where the depths of the @xmath43-extensions @xmath1180 are : @xmath1181 respectively . with a standard notebook ( 2.16 ghz ) we needed @xmath1182 seconds to construct this @xmath3-field in order to get the relation . applying our new algorithms , we can represent the harmonic sums in a @xmath175-field with again @xmath1183 extensions , but this time the depths are @xmath1184 respectively . e.g. , the extensions correspond to the sum representations and note that the representation of @xmath1172 and @xmath1171 in the corresponding @xmath175-field has been carried out in details in example [ exp : s12s21 ] . in total we needed 37 seconds ( instead of 772 seconds ) to construct the underlying @xmath175-field . based on this optimal @xmath175-field representation , by backwards transformation the relation can be found automatically . p. paule and a. riese . a mathematica q - analogue of zeilberger s algorithm based on an algebraically motivated aproach to @xmath0-hypergeometric telescoping . in m. ismail and m. rahman , editors , _ special functions , q - series and related topics _ , volume 14 , pages 179210 . fields institute toronto , ams , 1997 . Abstract:

Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.

Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered . Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video . Paper: the current successes of cold dark matter cosmologies , and in particular the @xmath1cdm models , are well known . these hierarchical models begin with the microwave background fluctuations and proceed forward to reproduce the structure in the ly@xmath2 forest at @xmath3 ( e.g. , mandelbaum et al . 2003 ) and continue to evolve the dark matter structure distribution to arrive at results consistent with the power spectrum of the distribution of galaxies at the present epoch ( e.g. , tegmark et al . 2004 ) , the fraction of baryons in rich clusters ( white et al . 1993 ) , and other notable results . these models follow the evolution of dark matter , and the accompanying galaxies are assumed to form as gas flows into the ever growing dark matter condensations ( e.g. , white and rees 1978 ) . the most detailed results describing this structure evolution have come from highly sophisticated numerical simulations that follow the growth of mass fluctuations in the early universe , such as the millennium simulation ( springel et al . 2005 ) . however , there are some well known difficulties with these models in that they predict too many faint and too many bright galaxies ( e.g. , benson et al . 2003 ) , and in addition they predict that the largest galaxies should be blue and star forming . these are serious difficulties , and they have been addressed through the use of various assumptions about physical processes that work on scales not resolved by the numerical simulations . these `` semi - analytic '' models have addressed the problems at both the dwarf galaxy and the brightest galaxy scales ; the issues addressed in this paper involve only the problems associated with the evolution of the brightest galaxies . the problems there are a direct result of the hierarchical nature of the models ; minute fluctuations in the very early universe grow due to continuing dark matter and baryonic infall , and in the context of the models this infall should continue to the present epoch , possibly leading to significant star formation now in the most massive galaxies . thus in this picture the most massive galaxies would be blue due to the large population of young stars , whereas in fact the largest galaxies are generally seen as `` red and dead '' at the present epoch , implying that the most active epoch of star formation occurred earlier ( e.g. , madau et al . 1996 , cowie et al . 1996 ) . to address this problem , one of the most commonly used assumptions in semi - analytic models is that of `` feedback '' from the central regions of the galaxy , where energy in some form is produced in sufficient quantity that it can heat the inflowing gas , perhaps stopping or reversing the inflow , and in any case providing enough energy to suppress star formation . once this has been done , the subject galaxy will then passively evolve , and its aging stellar population will become redder with time until the galaxy colors match the observations . motivated by the observation of active galactic nuclei ( agn ) in many massive red galaxies , several agn related driving mechanisms for this feedback have been suggested . radiatively driven winds , agn driven shocks and mass outflows , qsos , and radio sources associated with agns have all been proposed ( e.g. , sijacki et al . 2007 ) . in some instances qsos have been referred to as `` high luminosity '' agn feedback and radio - loud agn ( or `` radio agn '' ) have been called `` low luminosity '' agn feedback . this may not be a meaningful distinction , since many qsos may well be examples of powerful radio sources that are directed toward the observer , with their collimated emission doppler boosted to very high luminosities . the use of agns , and in particular radio agns , as sources of the energy required to suppress star formation in feedback models has appeal because estimates for the total energies of these objects derived from energy equipartition arguments have existed for some time . these minimum energies ( from @xmath4 ergs ) are , in an integral sense , adequate to provide the needed heating for agn feedback to work . moreover , recent estimates of the total energies present in some radio sources tend to lie factors of 10 higher than the estimates based on the equipartition energy present in relativistic electrons and fields ( brzan et al . 2008 ) . thus the total energies available in radio agn make these objects viable candidates for powering feedback and for suppressing star formation in massive galaxies , and radio agn have been incorporated into semi - analytic models that are based on cosmological simulations such as the millennium run ( e.g. , croton et al . 2006 , bower et al . 2006 , okamoto et al . for example , croton et al . ( 2006 ) show that a form of radio agn energy input can not only reproduce the observed truncation of the bright end of the luminosity function , but that it can also possibly suppress accretion and give rise to an old , red population of elliptical galaxies . radio agn feedback has also been used to explain the presence of old `` red and dead '' galaxies in voids ( croton & farrar 2008 ) , where environmental effects are much less pronounced . finally , radio agn feedback has also been suggested by several authors as a means of suppressing cooling or providing reheating in the cores of rich clusters of galaxies , thereby solving the `` cooling flow '' problem and at the same time accounting for the colors of brightest cluster galaxies ( e.g , fabian et al . 2000 , brggen & kaiser 2002 , ruszkowski et al . 2004 , mcnamara & nulsen 2007 ) . while the integrated total energies of radio sources are adequate , and sometimes more than adequate ( e.g. , best et al . 2006 ) to provide the needed feedback in semi - analytic models , the key question of `` does it really work ? '' remains . having enough total energy is only the first of several conditions that need to be met . in order for radio agn feedback to work , this energy contained in the outflowing radio sources must be transferred to the surrounding medium . in order to suppress star formation , this energy transfer has to be fairly efficient , and equally important , for radio agn feedback it has to be turned into heat , and it has to be distributed over most of the volume of gas in and around the halo of the parent galaxy . finally , all this has to happen in a time less than the local cooling time or dynamical infall time . until all of these conditions can be met , the effectiveness of radio agn feedback in solving significant difficulties with current cosmological models will remain in question . this paper provides a calculation of one way this energy transfer process can work . section ii presents an overview of the physical processes involved in radio agn feedback , while section iii describes a calculation of the energy transfer during the interaction of a radio source with its environment that covers up to 5 orders of magnitude in scale . the results of this calculation are given in section iv , and the conclusions are found in section v. a fundamental property of radio agn that has a major impact on the issue of feedback is the bipolar nature of the energy outflow . except for low energy `` compact radio sources '' , all radio agn show this morphology . the degree of collimation can be moderate , with opening angles of the flow of order twenty degrees or so , or it can be extreme , as in the case of the very energetic and highly collimated flows associated with high luminosity radio sources and quasars . this two - sided collimated outflow is the principal obstacle to radio agn feedback being an efficient and effective mechanism for energizing and heating ( or blowing away ) the gas in the central regions of the parent galaxy , since the heating and suppression of star formation must occur throughout the central region and not just along the two narrow cones in the vicinity of the radio jets . thus for feedback to be effective , some processes must be found that transfers energy from the jet to the surrounding medium , converts that energy to heat , and distributes it over most of the volume in the central regions of the parent galaxy . some possible mechanisms for this energy transfer have been previously suggested , such as shock waves from highly supersonic outflows ( brggen et al . 2007 , graham et al . 2008 ) or sound wave dissipation from less energetic events ( sanders & fabian 2007 , 2008 ) . these will be considered in more detail later , but in general shock waves are one - time events that rapidly slow and dissipate in the direction transverse to jet motion , while sound waves may or may not carry enough energy to heat large volumes of gas through their eventual dissipation . more importantly , the process of energy deposition by the sound waves in a magnetoionic medium is not clearly understood in this case , especially with regard to the dissipation lengths . clarification of possible feedback processes can be found from the luminosities , morphologies and demographics of the radio agn outflows . most extended radio sources can be placed in one of two categories first proposed by fanaroff & riley ( fanaroff & riley 1974 ) . these two classes , fr - i and fr - ii , are characterized by different luminosities and by very different radio morphologies . high luminosity fr - ii objects are generally characterized by two very highly collimated jets of emission extending over large distances , typically hundreds of kpc , with the jets terminating in regions of high surface brightness ( `` hot spots '' ) surrounded by lower surface brightness lobes which often have a `` swept back '' or `` bow shock '' appearance ( e.g. ferrari 1998 , de young 2002 ) . the morphologies of the lower luminosity fr - i objects are dramatically different , with the highest surface brightness near the nucleus of the parent galaxy and a gradual dimming of brightness along two moderately collimated jets with much wider opening angles than seen in the fr - ii objects . these outflows are also often bent or distorted and display a meandering morphology as the flow moves outward . this pattern of radio emission is very suggestive of the slow , subsonic flow associated with plumes and turbulent flows , and it was suggested many years ago ( e.g. , de young 1981 , bicknell 1984 ) that these radio sources were characterized by significant interaction with the surrounding ism or igm that resulted in mass entrainment and a deceleration of the agn outflow as it moves away from the nucleus . it may also be that the original outflow speeds in the fr - i objects are less than those existing in fr - ii sources , but in any case the current modeling of these objects usually involves deceleration to subsonic flow , presumably mediated by mass entrainment from the ambient medium ( e.g. , laing & bridle 2002 , 2004 ) . the second key point in considering radio agn feedback comes from the demographics of fr - i and fr - ii radio sources . it has been known for some time that the local space density of extended radio sources is dominated by fr - i objects ( e.g. , ledlow & owen 1996 , owen & ledlow 1997 , jackson & wall 1999 , willot et al . 2001 ) , where the local ( @xmath5 ) density of fr - i objects is roughly @xmath6 times that of fr - ii radio galaxies . the local density of fr - i radio sources , and a calibration point for constructing radio luminosity functions ( rlf ) is about 400 gpc@xmath7 ( rigby , best & snellen 2008 ) . due to the rapid decline in the detection of the fainter fr - i objects with distance , the dependence of the fr - i / fr - ii ratio with redshift is less clear , but recent surveys and modeling of the rlf out to moderate redshifts of less than 1 suggest that the space density of fr - i objects clearly dominates in the local universe ( willot et al . 2001 , cara & lister 2008 , donoso et al . thus to a very good approximation the `` generic '' radio agn outflow in the nearby universe can be taken to be an fr - i radio source . this may also be the case at moderate redshifts as well , since the previous picture of a constant fr - i space density with cosmic epoch coupled with a rapidly evolving fr - ii space density may be overly simple ( e.g. , rigby , best & snellen 2008 ) . in any case it is clear that `` radio agn feedback '' for redshifts less than one can be taken as `` fr - i agn feedback '' , and henceforth the focus here will be on fr - i objects as sources of radio agn feedback . a third observational result that constrains the feedback process comes from radio and x - ray observations of radio sources in rich clusters of galaxies . for the first time since their discovery over thirty years ago , it is now possible to carry out calorimetry of some radio source outflows by using estimates of the @xmath8 work done by the outflows in inflating cavities observed in the icm . ( e.g. , brzan et al . 2008 , mcnamara & nulsen 2007 and references therein . ) the role of such cavities as being a signature of radio agn feedback in clusters has been discussed elsewhere , and the relation of this phenomenon to more general fr - i outflows will be discussed at the end of section 4 . the focus here is on the general problem of radio agn feedback , both in and out of clusters and groups of galaxies , and the relevant result from the radio source calorimetry in clusters is that it reveals outflow energies that are generally in excess of the equipartition values that were commonly assumed in the past ( brzan et al . 2008 ) . these @xmath8 values are often an order of magnitude greater than the total energies contained in relativistic electrons and magnetic fields in minimum energy equipartition , and they are consistent with most of the energy residing in the kinetic energy flux of the outflow ( e.g. , de young 2006 ) . with these three observational constraints - the meandering plume - like morphology of fr - i radio sources , the dominance of fr - i objects in the nearby radio agn population , and the existence of much more energy in the outflows than is required to account for the synchrotron radio emission , the most likely paths for radio agn feedback become more clearly defined . first , if these outflows are truly subsonic over most of their length , and the morphological data are very suggestive of this , then heating by shock waves is not likely to be a significant energy transfer mechanism in these objects , nor is momentum transfer likely to form a nearly spherical outflowing wind that removes the ambient gas . second , because there is strong evidence that agn outflows are relativistic on very small ( @xmath9 parsec ) scales , the fr - i morphology strongly suggests significant deceleration of the flow . the uniform appearance of the outflows from the nucleus outward without any clear discontinuities together with the spreading of the outflow from the nucleus outward implies that this deceleration process begins near the nucleus and continues more or less uniformly throughout the outflow region within the parent galaxy . deceleration of the flow means a loss of momentum from the jet via a transfer of momentum from the jet to another medium , with the most obvious candidate being the ambient gas in the ism of the host galaxy . the most natural and most obvious candidate for this deceleration process is thus entrainment of , and transfer of momentum to , the ambient medium at the interface between the outflowing agn material and the ism and galactic halo gas . in addition to continuous deceleration from entrainment , deceleration of the outflow from its original speed near the galactic nucleus could entail the production of shock waves and subsequent heating , since vlbi observations of agn suggest very rapid outflow speeds on the parsec and subparsec scales in the innermost regions . however , the propagation of a decelerating supersonic jet into the circumnuclear gas will produce a driven bow - shock configuration that , for uniform flow , is a one - time event . in addition , except for the small angular region near the head of the jet , such shocks are generally weak , oblique , and decelerating . nonetheless , they probably occur around the initial outflow regions of the jets , and as such they could produce localized heating in the innermost regions of the parent galaxy , especially if the agn outflow involves multiple outbursts . this process may be at work in outflows in rich clusters such as 3c 84 , where deceleration is most dramatic due to the very high ambient densities . because the total energy involved in these shocks is much less than the kinetic energy of the outflow , and because the focus here is not on agn in rich clusters , the emphasis here will be on the transport of energy by the outflow itself , with most of the flow deceleration being due to continuous entrainment of the ambient medium . this entrainment process is mediated through the non - linear development of surface instabilities , most notably the kelvin - helmholtz ( kh ) instability , and it is driven by the large ( @xmath10 erg s@xmath7 ) kinetic energy flux of these outflows derived from the calorimetry described above . analytic approximations , laboratory experiments , and numerical simulations have all shown that this instability in shearing flows is essentially inevitable . incompressible flows , compressible flows , supersonic flows , mhd flows and relativistic shearing flows all show the onset and non - linear growth of the kh instability ( e.g. , chandrasekhar 1961 , brown & roshko 1974 , clemens & mungal 1995 , aloy et al , 1999 , ryu , jones & frank 2000 , perucho et al . 2004 , 2007 ) . in the fully non - linear stage of development the instability evolves into a mixing layer dominated by large scale vortex structures that entrain material from both sides of the layer into the layer itself ( e.g. , dimotakis & brown 1976 ) . the thickness of this layer grows as one moves down the jet from the onset of the non - linear phase of the instability , and the growth of the layer is nearly linear with distance along the jet until the jet is fully infiltrated by the layer . at that point a different evolutionary phase begins , as is described in section 3 . for a plane mixing layer , which is a good approximation to the cylindrical mixing layer in a round jet in its initial stages ( e.g. , dimotakis et al . 1983 , freund et al . 2000 ) , the initial growth is characterized by a nearly constant opening angle that depends upon the relative flow speeds and the fluid densities as @xmath11 where @xmath12 and @xmath13 are the densities in the outflow and the ambient medium respectively , and @xmath14 is the mach number of the outflow relative to the sound speed in the ambient medium ( e.g. , brown & roshko 1974 , dimotakis & brown 1976 , de young 1993 ) . empirical data suggest @xmath15 and @xmath16 . within this growing mixing layer the entrainment proceeds through the initial production of large scale eddies whose diameter is roughly equal to the thickness of the layer , followed by the development of finer scale structures within the eddies as well as merging of the larger scale structures . in other words , the mixing layer becomes fully turbulent . moreover , the thickness of this turbulent mixing layer grows as one moves downstream along the jet , and eventually the turbulence will penetrate throughout the entire volume of the outflow . from eq . 1 , the distance along the jet from the onset of the non - linear mixing layer to the point of complete infiltration of turbulence into the interior of the jet can be approximated by @xmath17 where @xmath18 is the radius of the jet at the onset of the mixing layer . beyond this point the flow within the jet is fully turbulent ; many experimental examples of such turbulent , decelerated jets can be found ( e.g. , dimotakis et al . 1983 , mungal et al . 1992 ) , and within the limits of resolution the outflow from fr - i objects such as 3c 31 is indistinguishable from these experimental results . thus the fr - i demographics , when combined with the evidence for uniform deceleration in their agn outflows , the universality of shear driven surface instabilities that entrain mass and provide momentum transfer through the growth of turbulent mixing layers , and the morphological similarities between fr - i outflows and subsonic turbulent plumes all provide evidence that the most common energy outflow associated with radio agn feedback is that of diverging , subsonic , fully turbulent plumes . this argument is given further support from a comparison of high resolution radio observations of fr - i outflows with experimental results concerning fully turbulent round jets propagating into a uniform medium . there is considerable evidence that such jets are self - similar flows ( e.g. , pope 2000 , hussein et al . 1994 ) , and that these flows all have the same opening angle once self - similarity is established . this angle is about 23 - 24 degrees , and an examination of radio observations of the fr - i objects 3c 31 and 3c 296 ( hardcastle et al . 2005 , laing et al . 2008 ) shows that both the north and south jets in these objects are very well enclosed by an opening angle of about 23 degrees ( @xmath19 ) . once the outflows show sudden divergence or bending this is no longer the case , but in the inner regions of the flow where the ambient conditions are likely to be fairly constant or slowly varying , the agreement with self - similar turbulent jets is remarkable . elements of this picture have been suggested before , and the first numerical simulation of mass entrainment in astrophysical jets was performed many years ago ( de young 1986 ) ; there has since been considerable development of phenomenological models of these flows ( e.g. , laing et al . 1999 , laing & bridle 2002 , 2004 , wang et al . 2009 ) . because magnetic fields are present in both the agn outflows and in the ambient medium , possible inhibition of the mixing layer growth by magnetic effects might occur , especially for `` favorable '' field geometries where @xmath20 is parallel to @xmath21 . however , it is clear that in the context of mhd outflow models , the average kinetic energy density must be much greater than the average magnetic energy density in order for the agn outflow to occur . ( the opposite case of nearly mass - free `` poynting '' jets is discussed in the last section . ) in the mhd case the concern is then that very local b field amplification due to turbulence could lead to local field energies sufficient to damp the development of the mixing layer . in this case , detailed 3d numerical mhd simulations of the development of the k - h instability and its fully non - linear growth ( e.g. , ryu et al . 2000 ) show that the flow remains `` essentially hydrodynamic '' . small scale field amplifications do occur , and at late times the amplitudes are comparable to the flow energy densities , but these areas are very localized and do not inhibit the growth of turbulent flow in the mixing layer on the larger scales of energy injection into the turbulence . it is important to note the difference between these dynamic , driven outflows and the much slower , passive evolution of buoyant " bubbles in an intracluster medium , where large scale icm fields may have an influence on the bubble evolution . this characterization of radio agn feedback as turbulent fr - i outflows provides the initial conditions for finding processes that can transform this outflow into widespread heating of the ambient medium . a major advantage of turbulent flows is that the ultimate fate of fully developed turbulent flows is conversion of the turbulent energy into heat . thus if mass entrainment and the generation of turbulence is the most efficient coupling of the agn outflow to the ambient medium , then the the natural evolution of that turbulence will provide the most effective heating of the gas in the galaxy by radio agn outflows . a central issue is how long this conversion takes . the next section provides a quantitative estimate of this time through a calculation of the evolution of a driven turbulent flow from its onset until its dissipation . the turbulent flow that describes the radio agn outflow can be recast in a form common to many turbulent flows . on some large scale comparable to a defining scale of the problem ( e.g. , the radius of the outflow ) energy is injected in the form of turbulent eddies . this process , as verified by experiment , involves a large scale ingestion of material on both sides of flow boundary in a `` gulping '' mode by the largest eddies ( e.g. , dimotakis & brown 1976 ) , followed by a rapid generation of finer and finer structure and mixing within this large scale as the flow evolves to smaller scales . in terms of the evolution of the energy spectrum of the turbulence , this can be described as energy injection over a small range of wavenumber @xmath22 followed by a loss free cascade of energy to larger wavenumbers . for homogeneous and isotropic hydrodynamic turbulence this process results in the standard power - law kolmogorov spectrum with @xmath23 . ( for mhd turbulence the power - law exponent is less well defined but is generally somewhat smaller . ) the dissipation of the turbulent kinetic energy into heat occurs at and above some wavenumber @xmath24 which generally lies many orders of magnitude above the energy injection scale @xmath25 . the kolmogorov formalism describes an equilibrium state where the energy input at @xmath25 is exactly balanced by the dissipation at @xmath24 . the problem being addressed here is not as simple , since what is needed is a calculation of the time required for the flow to reach the dissipation range at @xmath24 after the injection has begun at @xmath25 . because the evolution of the turbulent flow involves the non - linear interaction and energy transfer among turbulent scales of many different sizes , both upward and downward in @xmath22 space , the evolution must be calculated explicitly . in addition to the time dependent nature of the flow , a major hurdle is the many orders of magnitude in scale between the size of the large eddy injection range ( tens of parsecs or more ) to the energy dissipation scale due to effective viscosities in ionized plasma ( possibly meters or less ) . some simplifying assumptions can be made . if the overall outflow of the fr - i agns is subsonic or transonic relative to the ambient medium , then the flow can be regarded as generally incompressible . in addition , in a frame comoving with the mean local outflow speed the turbulence can be treated as locally homogeneous and weakly isotropic ( in that helicity is allowed ) to a good approximation . under these conditions a technique may be used that calculates the three dimensional time dependent evolution of turbulence , both hydrodynamic and magnetohydrodynamic , over several orders of magnitude in spatial scale . the original method was devised to treat purely hydrodynamical turbulence ( e.g. , orszag 1970 , 1972 ) but was subsequently generalized to include magnetic fields in the mhd approximation ( pouquet et al . 1976 , pouquet et al . 1978 , de young 1980 ) . this approach takes moments of the fourier transforms of the equations of mass , momentum and energy conservation in order to obtain equations that describe the time evolution of second moments of velocity and magnetic field , i.e. , the kinetic energy and magnetic energy , as a function of time and spatial scale . the system of moments is closed by using a quasi - normal approximation that assumes the fourth order moments are related to the second order moments in the same way as is the case for a gaussian distribution of fourier modes . this `` quasi - normal '' approximation permits closure of the system of equations at second order and results in differential equations that describe the temporal and spatial evolution in fourier space of the square of the fluid velocity ( i.e. , kinetic energy per unit mass ) and the magnetic energy per unit mass . the calculation uses a complex form of eddy viscosity that employs a markov cutoff in `` memory '' of the eddy interactions and includes the non - linear transfer of energy among turbulent eddies of different sizes , including triads of eddies with differing wavenumbers . some additional details are found in the appendix . the principal advantages of this eddy damped , quasi - normal markov ( edqnm ) method are its ability to calculate the time evolution of the turbulence over very large spatial ranges and its relatively modest computational requirements , especially when compared to the more straightforward methods of direct numerical simulation . the technique is is wide use , and its accuracy has been verified by comparison with both direct numerical simulations and with laboratory experiments ( e.g. , gomez et al . 2007 , vedula et al . 2005 , turner & pratt 2002 , lesieur & ossia 2000 , staquet & godeferd 1998 ) . details of this technique can be found in orszag ( 1977 ) , lesieur ( 2008 ) , and pouquet et al . ( 1976 ) and de young ( 1980 ) for the mhd generalization . as discussed in the appendix , evolution of the turbulence is followed by solving a series of integro - differential equations of the general form @xmath26dpdq.\ ] ] here @xmath27 is the fourier transformed magnetic or kinetic energy at wavenumber @xmath22 , @xmath28 is a dissipation constant ( either viscosity or magnetic diffusivity ) , @xmath29 is the forcing function or driving term , which in this case arises from the surface instabilities at the jet - ambient medium interface that create the large scale turbulent eddies driving the turbulent flow . the term @xmath30 represents the non - linear transfer terms in the flow which mediate the transfer of magnetic and kinetic energies over all wavenumbers ; i.e. , @xmath30 describes the processes that create the cascade of energy from large scale to small scales , the amplification of magnetic fields by fluid turbulence , and the inverse cascades , if any , of energy from small scales to larger scales . ( which in general is significant only in the presence of flows with net helicity . ) in general all of @xmath27 , @xmath31 , and @xmath30 are time dependent . the explicit form for @xmath30 can be complex because it describes the interaction of hydrodynamic turbulent eddies with each other , the interaction of hydrodynamic turbulence with any magnetic fields and the resulting possible magnetic field amplification , the effects of eddy viscosity , and the self interaction of magnetic turbulent structures with each other . the complete mhd forms of @xmath30 , including the effects of helicity ( * @xmath32 * and its magnetic counterpart * @xmath33 * ) are given in de young ( 1980 ) . in the present case magnetic effects are not of major concern . however , a very small , dynamically unimportant magnetic field is included for completeness ; its initial energy density is @xmath34 that of the turbulent kinetic energy density . it could in principle play a role in the dissipation process at small scales , but to include these effects would require a knowledge of the detailed field reconnection and dissipation mechanisms , which in turn would require a specification of field geometries and strengths as a function of scale length . since these are unknown , the magnetic diffusivity is chosen to be consistent with the hydrodynamic dissipation as described below . magnetic field amplification to equipartition with the hydrodynamic energies will occur on very small scales , but in the absence of any helicity this will have no effect on the evolution of the turbulence on the scales of interest here . the problem is specified by the injection of kinetic turbulent energy at some rate @xmath29 at a scale defined as the energy range , and the evolution of the turbulent energy spectrum is then followed as the energy cascades to smaller and smaller scales . a natural unit for length is that corresponding to the energy injection scale , @xmath35 , and a corresponding time scale comes from the largest eddy turnover time ; i.e. , @xmath36 , where @xmath37 is the mean velocity of the turbulent flow . because the turbulence is driven by shear instabilities in the mixing layer between the agn outflow and the surrounding medium , @xmath37 is comparable to the local jet outflow speed . the calculations here are basically scale free . this is because the actual dissipation scale is very many orders of magnitude smaller than the energy injection scale , and inclusion of the energy scale , which is necessary , means that even with this technique the calculation can not span the scale lengths from energy injection to dissipation . the dissipation scale is given by @xmath38 , where @xmath39 is the reynolds number appropriate to the large scale flow and @xmath25 is the wavenumber corresponding to the energy injection scale . the hydrodynamic reynolds number is @xmath40 , where @xmath41 is the average velocity at scales @xmath25 ; i.e. , @xmath42 . the magnetic reynolds number is just this expression with the magnetic diffusivity @xmath43 substituted for the kinetic viscosity @xmath28 . for a hot ( @xmath44k ) rarefied ( @xmath45 ) plasma @xmath46 ( e.g. , spitzer 1962 ) , and energy injection scales of tens of parsecs and sonic or subsonic flow speeds of @xmath47 km / sec imply ten or more orders of magnitude in scale between the energy injection scale and the dissipation scale . even though the equations of the form ( 2 ) above are solved numerically on a logarithmic scale in @xmath22 space , a solution that spans the complete scale from @xmath25 to @xmath24 is not feasible , especially in view of a causality condition discussed below . thus the actual values of the dissipation constants @xmath28 and @xmath43 never enter into the calculation , and no inherent scales are present . this means that application of the results can be applied to many different spatial and time scales , and this characteristic will be used in estimating the time for the turbulent energy flow to actually reach the regime where energy is dissipated into heating the ambient medium . because the wavenumber range included in the calculations is less than the complete range to @xmath24 , some mechanism has to be used at the upper end @xmath48 of the calculated wavenumber range to simulate the continuation of the loss free cascade of energy to wavenumbers beyond @xmath48 . if this is not done , unphysical reflection of turbulent energy from the upper end of the calculated wavenumber range can occur . a standard method for treating this is to use artificially large values of the dissipation constants @xmath28 and @xmath43 . these are adjusted so that the resulting effective values of @xmath24 are somewhat less than @xmath48 so that no spurious energy reflections are seen . the differential equations of the form given by eq . 2 are solved numerically on a discrete grid in @xmath22 space , and in order to avoid non - physical energy fluctuations , a time step control similar to a courant condition must be used . the value of the time step in the integration is chosen to be less than the minimum of @xmath49 . this ensures the correct behavior at high wavenumbers ; it also illustrates why extending the calculated wavenumber range beyond about 5 orders of magnitude is not practical . because the calculation is scale free , the obvious scaled values to choose are @xmath50 and @xmath51 ; once the physical dimension and speed corresponding to these are chosen , the time step is determined and the problem is well defined . the scale - free nature of the calculation allows a simple estimate of the time required to actually reach the true dissipation range once a calculation has reached equilibrium over the more limited wavenumber range described above . suppose a calculation is made of the evolution of the turbulence spectrum between some @xmath52 and @xmath53 using a @xmath54-function energy input at @xmath52 . let @xmath53 be some large multiple @xmath55 of @xmath52 , about 100 , and suppose the spectrum reaches a steady state at some time @xmath56 , where @xmath57 is measured in units of @xmath58 with @xmath59 ; @xmath60 is roughly the large scale eddy turnover time at @xmath52 , and @xmath61 is the mean flow speed of the turbulence on this scale . hence @xmath56 can be measured in units of the turnover time and thus @xmath62 . because it is scale free , the same calculation also applies to driving turbulence between @xmath53 and @xmath63 with a @xmath54-function at @xmath53 . in this case a steady state is reached in some time @xmath64 where now @xmath57 is measured in units of @xmath65 with @xmath66 . similarly , the calculation can be made between @xmath67 and @xmath68 , and so on until some @xmath69 is reached where @xmath70 . then the total time required for the turbulence to cascade from @xmath52 to the dissipation range is just @xmath71 . but @xmath72 and similarly for the other @xmath73 . but in this scale - free calculation , @xmath74 , and thus @xmath75 , and so @xmath76 . to a first approximation all of the @xmath77 are equal , though it could be argued that as one goes to smaller and smaller scales the relevant values of @xmath77 decrease due to an increasing effective viscosity , especially in the presence of magnetic fields . by setting all @xmath78 a lower limit on the value of @xmath79 is obtained , and this is the most constraining value for the issue of concern here . then @xmath80 , and since @xmath81 the time for the turbulent flow to reach the dissipation range and begin to heat the ambient medium is @xmath82 . % $ $ \ ] ] thus a good approximation of the time for the turbulent cascade to reach the dissipation stage is just the number @xmath83 of large scale eddy turnover times that are required for the establishment of a steady state turbulent cascade over a factor of about @xmath84 in scale and beginning with the scale of the large scale energy injection . i.e. , @xmath85 . in this model the energy injection occurs on the scale of the largest eddies when the outflowing jet first becomes fully turbulent from outer boundary to centerline . in the limiting case the energy injection spectrum could be taken as a delta function centered on @xmath86 , and the energy injection function in eq . 2 would have the form @xmath87 ) . since the goal of the calculation is to determine the time required for the turbulence originating on a scale @xmath25 to cascade down to the dissipation range , the injection spectrum should be some sharply peaked function centered on @xmath25 . a narrow gaussian form may be more cosmetically appealing but will be seen to have little effect on the outcome of the calculation . the value of the constant @xmath88 controls the amplitude of the energy injection spectrum , and because the calculation is looking at the minimum time required for the turbulent cascade to reach the dissipation range , values of @xmath88 near the maximum allowed are of interest . the units of @xmath88 are ( kinetic ) energy per unit mass per unit time , and in the dimensionless units used here , @xmath88 should be some fraction of @xmath89 , where @xmath90 is the value of the jet radius at which the flow becomes fully turbulent throughout its volume . the maximum value of @xmath88 is then equal to one . a `` reasonable '' choice might be to set an average large scale eddy size to half @xmath90 and the similarly for some average rotation speed of those eddies as @xmath91 , which gives a value of @xmath92 in dimensionless units where @xmath93 and @xmath94 . in fact , it will be seen that values of @xmath88 between 1.0 and 0.1 yield roughly the same results . introducing a time variation in @xmath88 is easily done , but such variations could only be less than the maximal value and thus defeat the purpose of finding minimum equilibration times . hence @xmath88 will be kept constant . a major virtue of the formalism used here is that the calculation is carried out with logarithmic intervals in @xmath22 space , and though this introduces some complications to ensure that energy transfer among structures in neighboring regions of wavenumber space is not incomplete , it allows the calculation to cover many orders of magnitude in scale and thus permits the development of a turbulent cascade through the loss - free inertial range . in general the calculations here cover almost four orders of magnitude in scale in three dimensions , which would require a major computational effort in a direct numerical simulation . most calculations used a wavenumber range of @xmath95 $ ] , while more extensive runs extended the upper limit to @xmath96 . the kinetic energy in the edqnm formalism must be positive definite , so the initial energy spectra were set equal to a constant but negligible value of @xmath97 in scaled units at all wavenumbers . this is three to four orders of magnitude below the injection energy and has no effect on the evolution of the energy spectrum resulting from the turbulent mixing layer . the energy levels at the upper and lower ends of the wavenumber range were not fixed after initialization . in practice there is no significant inverse cascade of energy in the absence of helicity , so the value of @xmath98 at the low end of the wavenumber range ( largest scale ) does not evolve from its initial value . the energy at the largest wavenumber @xmath48 begins to fall immediately due to the very rapid energy transfer on the smallest scales , but this value always remains non - zero . the major free parameters in these calculations are the shape and amplitude of the energy injection spectrum @xmath99 . other parameters that can be varied are the wavenumber range , the length of time covered by the calculation , the value of the viscosity to test for any influence on the spectral evolution , and the density of points in wavenumber space . for most of the calculations the shape of @xmath99 was taken to be a delta function centered at the energy injection scale @xmath25 , as discussed above . in some runs this shape was changed to a gaussian distribution in the log of injection energy sharply peaked at @xmath100 , and with @xmath101 in log@xmath22 . the values of @xmath88 ranged from the maximum of 1.0 to 0.01 , with the most common value being 0.25 as described previously . the normalization constant for the gaussian runs was chosen so that the peak of the distribution had the same amplitude at @xmath102 as did the delta function energy injection , thus providing a comparable energy injection rate . the scaled wavenumber range was in most cases from 0.015 to 128 , with a few runs being made over the range @xmath103 $ ] . values of the time evolution of the turbulent energy spectra were calculated at equally spaced logarithmic intervals in the @xmath22 domain ; some runs were repeated with the density of points increased by a factor of two to see what effect , if any , would result from changing the size of @xmath104 . as described above , values of the viscosity @xmath28 were chosen so that an effective @xmath24 lay near the value of @xmath48 . various small changes in @xmath28 were made in some runs to find the smallest value of @xmath28 that would not produce any `` feedback '' from the upper end of the @xmath22 range into the larger scales . such unphysical inverse cascades were immediately apparent by the growth or `` bunching up '' of elevated @xmath98 values at the top end of the wavenumber range . adequately high dissipation to ensure only a direct and unimpeded cascade to smaller scales ( large @xmath22 ) was always shown by a rolloff in values of @xmath98 from a power law at the highest wavenumbers . the timestep was determined for each run via the effective courant condition described earlier ; increases in @xmath105 much above this value immediately result in zero or negative values of @xmath98 at the highest wavenumbers . the objective of these calculations is a determination of the time elapsed from the onset of driven turbulence on some large scale to the transformation of the turbulent energy into heat at the dissipation scale . this first occurs when the turbulent cascade reaches an equilibrium or steady state condition with energy flowing in at @xmath25 and being dissipated at @xmath24 after transit through a loss free cascade to ever smaller scales . establishment of this equilibrium is an asymptotic process , hence the time required for equilibrium will be set at that time when any changes in the energy spectrum per unit time are less than a few percent . this will give a minimum time for establishment of equilibrium and will result in the minimum time for feedback into heat to occur . the approach to equilibrium is slightly complicated because there is no well defined `` front '' of energy marching down to smaller scales into a constant background of very low turbulent energy . instead , as soon as the calculation is begun , energy begins to flow to higher wavenumbers , as it should . this means that the initial constant and very small value of @xmath98 set at the beginning shows a decay at large @xmath22 before the energy flow from the injection region arrives at the smallest scales . hence the shape of the spectrum evolves over the full wavenumber range for all times greater than zero . figure 1 , which shows the early evolution of the turbulent kinetic energy spectrum as a function of time , illustrates this behavior . in this case the energy injection spectrum has a delta function form for @xmath29 at @xmath106 , and time is measured in units of the @xmath106 eddy turnover time , @xmath107 . at early times ( @xmath108 ) the effects of the energy drain at large wavenumber is very evident , since the spectrum in this range is reduced far below the initial constant value of @xmath97 described in section 3.2 . nonetheless , at @xmath109 the flow of energy from the injection region at @xmath106 to smaller scales is clearly seen , with a `` front '' of the energy cascade having arrived as far as @xmath110 . by @xmath111 the effects of energy injection have reached to scales of order @xmath34 smaller than the injection region , but , as figure 1 shows , the spectrum has not yet reached an equilibrium state by @xmath112 . figure 2 shows the late time evolution of the kinetic energy spectrum , and there it is clear that for scales smaller than the injection scale , there is very little evolution in the spectrum at times later than @xmath113 , with little or no evolution past @xmath114 . at larger scales there continues to be a slow growth of turbulent energy on scales of up to 10 times the size of the injection region , consistent with previous calculations . however , this region is of no concern for the present problem , and in addition the applicability of homogeneity on these scales is less certain for the jet structures considered here . the region @xmath115 has no effect on small scale evolution , and in the absence of helicity almost all the injected energy cascades to the small scale regions ( e.g. , de young 1980 ) . figure 3 shows the resultant spectrum at @xmath113 when the wavenumber space is extended to @xmath116 , thus spanning over 5 orders of magnitude in scale . as discussed above , this is a practical maximum for a single calculation due to the time step constraints at the smallest scales . figure 3 also shows a comparison between a @xmath54 function energy injection at @xmath106 and a gaussian energy injection on the same scale with the normalization discussed in the previous section . it is clear that there is no significant difference in the late time spectra that result from the two different energy injection functions . also evident in figure 3 is the establishment of a clear power - law energy spectrum for times greater than @xmath113 . finally , figure 4 shows the time evolution of the total ( kinetic plus magnetic ) energy for the @xmath54 function injection case that covers the range @xmath117 . from this figure it is clear that the turbulence has not reached an equilibrium state for times less than @xmath118 . however , it does seem that equilibrium is established by @xmath114 . the early rapid growth of @xmath119 for times less than ten is due to the constant inflow of injected energy with no loss at the high wavenumber end having yet occurred . the slower growth for @xmath120 reflects the evolution of the spectrum after energy loss begins but is not yet in equilibrium . in addition , after @xmath111 the conversion of kinetic energy into magnetic energy begins to become noticeable at the few percent level . throughout all these calculations , the total turbulent energy is always dominated by the kinetic energy ; the maximum magnetic energy integrated over all scales never exceeds about 70 percent of the kinetic energy . additional calculations were made with variations of other parameters mentioned in the previous section , such as variation of @xmath121 , @xmath104 , @xmath105 , @xmath122 , and @xmath28 . however , these variations did not significantly alter the overall results presented in figures 1 though 4 . in particular , the variation of @xmath121 , which might be thought to have the largest effect , was not particularly notable . calculations were made with values of @xmath121 varying from 0.1 to 1.0 , and while the amplitude of the turbulent energy spectrum increased as @xmath121 was increased , the shapes of the equilibrium spectra were virtually invariant over an order of magnitude change in @xmath121 . this is not surprising given the tendency for the turbulent mhd cascade to evolve toward a common power - law form . moreover , the scaled time required to establish equilibrium was about @xmath123 in all cases , which is consistent with a scale free calculation . variations in @xmath105 and @xmath28 have been discussed above ; these are controlled by the courant condition to preserve positive definite energies and to avoid unphysical inverse cascades of energy at large wavenumber . the effects of changing the upper limit on the wavenumber range are shown in the figures ; a more clear definition of the loss - free power - law energy cascade is seen with larger @xmath122 , but the time required to reach equilibrium is not affected . this is also an expected result , since equilibrium is reached most rapidly at the smallest scales ( largest @xmath22 ) . decreasing the value of @xmath104 and increasing the density of computational points has the expected effect of making the energy transfer among triads of wavenumbers slightly more efficient . a doubling of the density of points in @xmath22 results in maximum change in @xmath124 of 7 percent at the upper end of the wavenumber range . again , the time to reach equilibrium , which is governed by processes on the larger scales , is unaffected . thus a robust conclusion that emerges from these calculations and which is illustrated in figures 2 and 4 is that the turbulent cascade reaches equilibrium over the wavenumber range @xmath125 in about 100 large scale eddy turnover times ; @xmath126 . this result can then be combined with equation 3 for the time required after the onset of energy injection to reach turbulent dissipation of energy into heat ; @xmath127 \\ \approx ( n\ell_{1}/v).\ ] ] thus these results imply that a value of @xmath128 is appropriate for these turbulent jet flows . with this result in hand it is now possible to estimate the time required for radio agn outflows to convert their outflow energy into heat . to do this requires a conversion from the scale free calculation here into the relevant astrophysical quantities . the first scale to establish is the spatial scale that corresponds to @xmath25 where the energy is injected . this is basically the size of the large scale fully developed turbulent eddies which are driving the turbulence , powered by the vorticity generated in the shearing motions of the mixing layer . as described earlier , the mixing layer grows in thickness until it permeates the entire jet , at which point the flow is fully turbulent , and it is at stage that the interior of the jet can be characterized as a homogeneous and isotropic ( in a comoving frame ) turbulent flow . hence the size of the large scale eddies at the point of complete turbulent infiltration or saturation is an appropriate measure of the energy injection scale . given the internal structure of mixing layers , a good approximation for this eddy size is just the radius of the outflowing jet at saturation , since that is where the linearly expanding mixing layers merge together and the potential flow in the core of the jet ceases . experimental data on gaseous turbulent jets also show that the large scale structures at this point are comparable to the jet radius ( dimotakis et al . 1983 ) . in addition , it is at this point that the opening angle of the outflow increases slightly and takes on the common value of @xmath129 seen in fully turbulent round jets . ( some experimental data for turbulent jets also show the creation of larger scale structures that develop in the downstream flow , but these are often attributed to merging or pairing of large eddies formed earlier rather than an indication of an energy injection scale ( e.g. , brown & roshko 1974 , dimotakis et al . in addition , these structures are most apparent in fluid turbulent jets and are less dominant in very high reynolds number gaseous jets ( dimotakis et al . 1983 , dahm & dimotakis 1990 ) . ) determination of the jet radius when it becomes fully turbulent can be estimated from analytic approximations to @xmath130 or from observations of the early stages of fr - i outflows . the latter is probably the more robust method , given the uncertainty in the initial jet densities and outflow speeds . radio observations of the inner regions of 3c 31 and 3c 296 ( hardcastle et al . 2002 , laing et al . 2008 , hardcastle et al . 2005 ) permit an estimation of the jet width in its earliest turbulent phase . in particular , the southern jets in these objects show an increase of the jet opening angle to @xmath131 degrees that marks the transition to self - similar fully turbulent outflow . estimates of the jet radii at these points give values in the the range @xmath132 kpc , and thus a reasonable estimate from these data for the scale corresponding to @xmath133 is about @xmath134 kpc . a consistency check can be made by looking at the corresponding values of @xmath130 and the density ratios and outflow speeds that would be required . for example , in 3c 31 the estimated point where the jets appear fully turbulent is at a distance of about 1.7 kpc from the nucleus , while in the case of 3c 296 this distance is about @xmath135 kpc . using this as a rough measure of @xmath130 , and assuming that the functional form for plane mixing layers given above can be generalized to mixing layers for round jets , given the overall similarity of the mixing layers in the two cases ( e.g. , freund et al . 2000 , dimotakis et al . 1983 ) , then it is possible to see if `` reasonable '' values of outflow densities and speeds near the nucleus result . the jet becomes fully turbulent at a radius @xmath136 , and using @xmath137 and @xmath138 kpc as an average of the above numbers , together with the observed temperatures and inferred number densities for the ambient medium in 3c 31 and 3c 296 at about 1.5 kpc from the their nuclei ( hardcastle et al . 2002 , 2005 ) gives jet flow speeds in the innermost regions of @xmath139 cm s@xmath7 and jet number densities of @xmath140 @xmath141 , this is consistent with models of `` light '' jets which are mildly relativistic in the innermost regions ( e.g. , laing et al . thus different and independent approaches indicate that a value of @xmath142 kpc is a consistent value to take for the scale of the energy injection range , and this value will be taken to be the size corresponding to @xmath25 . once a value of @xmath90 is established , the remaining scales can be fixed by setting a velocity scale , and this is usually chosen to be the turbulent turnover speed of the large scale eddies in the energy range . the flow in the mixing layer is subsonic relative to the ambient medium as argued previously , perhaps transsonic at most in the initial stages . hence the value of the eddy turnover speed @xmath143 will be some fraction of the local sound speed in the ambient medium , and this in turn has been established for some fr - i objects via observations of x - ray emission in the central regions of the parent galaxies . these observations are consistent with thermal bremsstrahlung radiation , and thus a temperature and sound speed for this gas can be established . in particular , chandra observations of 3c 31 and 3c 296 ( hardcastle et al . 2002 , 2005 ) are consistent with gas temperatures of order @xmath144k , with corresponding sound speeds of @xmath145 cm s@xmath7 . thus a an average value of @xmath146 in the energy injection range is consistent with observations and will be used here . this value is significantly less than the above estimate of @xmath147 in the innermost region of the jet , and so it is also consistent with significant deceleration having occurred , especially in the outer layers of the jet , due to mass entrainment via the growing turbulent mixing layer . once these scales are established , a time unit of @xmath148 , the large eddy turnover time , follows naturally , as does the unit of turbulent kinetic energy density per unit mass , @xmath149 . this last quantity is the unit ( per unit wavenumber ) used in the energy spectra shown in figs . 1 - 3 . the previous two sections provide the information needed to establish an estimate of the time required from the establishment of a fully turbulent outflow in an fr - i jet to the onset of conversion of turbulent energy into heat . as argued above , both observations and analytic approximations suggest a large scale eddy size at the energy injection region of @xmath142 kpc , with an accompanying turbulent eddy speed of @xmath150 cm s@xmath7 . this gives a time unit for the turbulence calculations of @xmath151s or @xmath152 yr . the nonlinear turbulence calculation shows the establishment of an equilibrium spectrum in about 100 large scale eddy turnover times , which gives an estimate of the time for the onset of conversion of outflow energy into heat of about 100 million years . these times are comparable to or less than the bremsstrahlung cooling times deduced from x - ray observations of hot gas in and around the host galaxies of fr - i radio sources ( e.g. , hardcastle et al . 2002 , 2005 ; laing et al . 2008 ) . where is this heat deposited ? the above time estimate is a measure of the beginning of the conversion into heat ; it presumably continues for a time comparable to the lifetime of the agn outflow . this injection of heat can not take place within the confines of the outflows that are observed to be well defined jets , since the energy density in these regions is so high that conversion of all the directed kinetic energy into heat at that point would result in pressures high enough to decollimate the jet . hence there is a need to know how far the jets will propagate in the @xmath0 years after they become fully turbulent . the mean outflow speeds in these objects are unknown , but an estimate can be gained from the arguments that the jets are fully turbulent flows . as mentioned before , such jets are self - similar flows , and experimental data show that the on - axis outflow speed in such jets is approximately 10 times the mean outflow speed on the surface of the jet ( e.g. , pope 2000 , hussein et al . 1994 ) . from previous considerations the outflow speed on the surface of the jet is of the order of or less than the local sound speed , and this has been estimated to be @xmath44 cm s@xmath7 in the region of turbulent energy injection . thus in this phase of the jet propagation a mean outflow speed of @xmath0 cm s@xmath7 may be used , which would place the onset of conversion into heat at a distance of 100 kpc or so from the onset of the fully turbulent phase . this is well beyond the collimated outflow region of most fr - i objects , and hence deposition of heat in this region would not be in conflict with the observed properties of the jets . moreover , this region may lie in that portion of the outflow where the agn flow has become much more broadly dispersed and less well collimated . this decollimation process is necessary if radio agn feedback is to work , since the heating must take place over a large volume in order to provide significant suppression of star formation . the 100 kpc estimate is somewhat uncertain , since beyond ten kpc or so from the nucleus the radio morphology of fr - i outflows shows a clear departure from simple self - similar flow . however , it could be that there is very little deceleration beyond this point , and that most of the mass entrainment is completed by this time . the jet morphologies are not inconsistent with this , in which case the outflow speeds near the centerline of the jet remain about the same as they were in the self - similar regime , and the above estimate of @xmath153 kpc retains some validity . this is suggestive , but hardly definitive . there is in addition the fact that centerline outflow speeds in self - similar jets decrease linearly with distance , though the relevant constant in this relation is unknown ; hence there will be some , possibly non - negligible , deceleration of the jet from the onset of self - similarity until the @xmath154 kpc scale is reached . the late stages of the evolution of these flows raises the issue of their relation to the agn outflows seen in the cores of rich galaxy clusters . much work has been done on the role of `` radio bubbles '' in the icm , relic and otherwise , and their possible influence on the evolution of the icm and brightest cluster galaxies ( e.g. , fabian et al . 2002 , brggen & kaiser 2001 , fabian et al . 2002 , de young 2003 , jones & de young 2005 , oneill et al . 2009 ) , and a natural question arises about the relation of these objects to the flows discussed here . in general , most fr - i agn do not show radio `` bubbles '' , nor are they usually found in the cores of rich clusters . for those that are , it it likely that relatively low powered fr - i jets would be rapidly decelerated and confined by the high ambient pressures and could slowly inflate buoyant cavities in the hot icm , as has been suggested by many models . such cavities are usually small for low radio powers , a few tens of kpc , and the jet structures feeding them are even smaller ( e.g. , mcnamara & nulsen 2007 ) . by contrast , the fully turbulent fr - i jets discussed here are themselves tens of kpc in length before the onset of complex large scale flow patterns such as bends or meanders . hence there is likely to be a continuum in radio source morphology for a given radio power as one moves from very high pressure regions in the centers of rich clusters to lower pressure environments found in small clusters , groups , and individual galaxies . the onset of mixing layers , entrainment and deceleration could occur in all these environments , as has been argued here , with the process occurring on smaller scales in more dense and high pressure environments ( cf . however , one important added factor in the dense icm in cluster cores is the presence of non - negligible external magnetic fields . although the kh instability and resultant mixing occurs unabated in mhd flows with weak fields ( ryu , jones & frank 2000 ) , if the average magnetic energy density becomes comparable to the kinetic energy density , then the mixing layer picture may have to be modified , especially if the external fields have long coherence lengths . in particular , expansion of an inflated `` bubble '' into a magnetized medium may not result in the late stage mixing that simple hydrodynamic flows would suggest ( de young 2003 , de young et al . 2008 ) , so in the case of cluster cores the final step in agn feedback may be more difficult to accomplish . this issue is at present still unresolved . though the creation of bubbles and cavities may be the end state of the flow in high pressure environments , in lower pressure regions the final state could be much more diffuse and distorted due to large scale external magnetic fields or to any flows in the circumgalactic gas caused by galaxy orbits or merging events . the detection ( or not ) of such faint extended regions is very much a function of x - ray and radio telescope sensitivity and selection effects . in this context is it very interesting to note that rudnick & brown ( 2009 ) have recently observed very large , diffuse polarized radio structures surrounding the fr - i object 3c 31 . though further observations are needed , such very large structures could be the signature of the decollimated and widely dispersed portions of radio agn outflows where the heat is deposited from fully turbulent jets . a similar widely dispersed radio emitting region has been known for some time to surround the collimated outflows from the fr - i source associated with m87 ( owen et al . thus the issue of where the turbulent energy is actually deposited remains an important unresolved problem . it was argued above that a distance from the nucleus of @xmath153 kpc was not unreasonable for the onset of heat deposition , but also discussed there were the uncertainties associated with agn outflow speeds for distances greater than @xmath154 kpc . for isolated galaxies , heat deposition at @xmath153 kpc is clearly too distant for thermal suppression of star formation in the near galactic halo , yet the presence of coherent flows on scales @xmath155 10 kpc argues for conversion to heat beyond 10 kpc . the picture is further complicated by low surface brightness radio data for some fr - i objects ( e.g. , 3c 296 , m87 ) ; these show the presence of faint radio emission very close to the stellar extent of the galaxy , and the implication here is that agn outflow material from earlier epochs may have been advected or diffused back into the near circumgalactic regions . these data could imply that deposition of heat is possible into inner galactic halo at distances a few tens of kpc from the nucleus , probably on timescales in excess of @xmath156 years . however , it seems clear that if energy deposition is needed for isolated galaxies in the inner regions of the ism , further investigation into the very late time evolution of outflows is needed to see if this process is viable . the object of this paper is an exploration of the feasibility of radio agn feedback . the constraints on this process are that it must heat the interstellar and circumgalactic medium around the host galaxy in a time less than or the order of the ambient gas cooling time and with enough volume coverage so that significant star formation can be suppressed and the host galaxy will appear to be undergoing passive evolution . the issue of radio agn feedback in massive , rich clusters of galaxies is not specifically addressed , as this process has been treated in many other papers . instead , the more general case of radio agn feedback for galaxies in small groups and clusters and even in isolated systems is considered here . the emphasis is to proceed from the basic properties of agn outflows to see if a continuous chain of physical processes can be established that will lead to the required heating in the required time . the analysis has a small number of fairly simple steps . first , observations show that the most common class by far of radio agn in universe out to @xmath157 and perhaps beyond is the class of fr - i radio sources . second , the morphology of these objects strongly suggests that their bipolar outflows are subsonic or transsonic beyond a few kpc from the nucleus . third , given the evidence for relativistic outflows very close to the nucleus together with the nearly universal onset of global surface instabilities in such shearing flows , this slow outward motion strongly suggests that it is due to deceleration of the flow via the formation of non - linear mixing layers and their accompanying mass entrainment on the surface of the jet . fourth , experimental evidence argues convincingly that such turbulent mixing layers will soon penetrate throughout the jet volume , resulting in a fully turbulent flow in the interior of the bipolar outflows . this conclusion is reinforced by the opening angle of the radio jets observed in some nearby fr - i objects ; this angle is completely consistent with the experimental data on fully turbulent self - similar jet outflows . fifth , it is well known that such turbulent flows eventually cascade to smaller and smaller structures until a dissipation range is reached where most of the turbulent kinetic energy is converted into heat . a series of 3d time dependent calculations of the evolution of such turbulent flows is then performed to see if this eventual conversion of collimated outflow energy into heat can take place in a time short enough to be of interest for agn feedback . the answer appears to be yes , with the first onset of heating occurring roughly @xmath156 years after the development of fully turbulent flow ; this time is comparable to or less than the cooling times derived from x - ray observations of gas surrounding nearby fr - i radio galaxies . finally , the question of where this heat is deposited and whether or not the deposition is sufficiently isotropic is briefly addressed . to retain the observed radio source structure , heating probably occurs beyond the extent of the coherent jet outflow . estimates of outflow speeds for fully turbulent jets indicate energy deposition on scales as large as @xmath9 100 kpc , which is well beyond the coherent jet structures for most fr - i objects . isolated galaxies may require heating on smaller scales , and there is some evidence this might be occurring due to late time evolution of the flows . recent observations of very large scale and diffuse radio structures around 3c 31 and earlier observations of m87 suggest that the suggested large scale heat deposition may be taking place . these simple arguments , while suggestive , are not conclusive . it seems likely that the idea of slow and turbulent outflows from fr - i radio agn is either almost certainly right or very wrong , the latter because we have missed the fundamental nature of jet outflows from agn . for example , if these flows are `` poynting flows '' that are completely dominated at all times by magnetic fields and have very few particles ( e.g. , li et al . 2006 ) , then the nature of the interaction with the surrounding medium might be very different , with little or no role for mhd or hydrodynamic turbulence . however , it is not clear how such magnetically dominated outflows can reproduce the morphology observed in the fr - i radio sources . even if turbulent jets are the correct description , there are details of their evolution suggested by observations that may mean departures from the isotropic turbulence in their interiors that is used here . deflections , bending , or propagation into decreasing density gradients or into inhomogeneities may all cause departures from this condition and perhaps changes in the time required for turbulence to decay into heat . the magnitude of such departures is currently unknown , and they may be small enough that the above treatment remains a good approximation , especially in the interior of the jet . finally , the large scale distribution of energy from radio agn outflows remains a largely unsolved problem . the observational hints are suggestive , but more observations of faint and diffuse radio emission around fr - i outflows are needed , as are additional calculations of the very late stages of these outflows . portions of this work were completed during the aspen center for physics astrophysics programs in 2008 and 2009 . thanks are due to bob rosner and to tom jones for illuminating discussions and to jessica moy for bibliographic assistance . presented here are some additional concepts and relations that lie behind the derivation of equation ( 2 ) . most of the basic framework of the edqnm method is given in the main body of the paper , and complete derivations for all aspects of the method , together with more detailed descriptions of the method and its variants , are provided in the references cited . a particularly complete treatment is found in lesieur ( 2008 ) . where @xmath161 is the magnetic field , @xmath162 is the density , @xmath163 is the fluid velocity , @xmath164 is the pressure and @xmath165 is the magnetic susceptibility . here @xmath28 is the kinematic viscosity , @xmath43 is the magnetic diffusivity , and @xmath166 is a forcing term that represents the injection of kinetic energy into the system . in principal the formalism also accommodates the injection of magnetic energy as well as kinetic and magnetic helicities ( @xmath167 and @xmath168 ) . the treatment described here is restricted in nearly incompressible flows that are almost isotropic in that they admit helicity in the flow fields . extensions of the method to anisotropic and quasi compressible flows are described in the references . as mentioned in the text , the edqnm method derives equations that govern the second order moments of velocity and magnetic field which thus provide the evolution of the kinetic and magnetic energy densities . these governing equations actually determine the behavior of the fourier transformed moments ; because fourier components are global averages over configuration space , the equations provide the evolution of energy on a particular scale over the entire flow and thus provide immediately the time evolution of the energy spectra . in addition , operation in fourier space allows in this formalism the integration of the governing equations using logarithmic intervals in wavenumber space and so permits coverage over many orders of magnitude in spatial scale in three dimensions , a task that would be extremely difficult through direct numerical simulation . the general form of equation ( 2 ) in the text can be obtained by first taking the fourier transform of the above navier - stokes equation , which gives , for no magnetic fields and no helicity , with @xmath162 explicit , the general form @xmath169\ ] ] where @xmath170 is the fourier transform of the velocity @xmath171 , @xmath31 is the fourier transform of the forcing ( energy injection ) term and f.t . is the fourier transform operator . the transformed incompressibility condition becomes @xmath172 , and this condition allows elimination of the pressure from the equation of motion . this is because the incompressibility equation shows that @xmath173 is in a plane perpendicular to @xmath174 , and thus so are @xmath175 and @xmath176 , while the pressure gradient @xmath177 is parallel to @xmath174 . as a result , the f.t . of @xmath178 is the projection onto the plane containing @xmath173 of the f.t . of the non - linear term @xmath179 . thus the form of the fluid equation in fourier space becomes , in general , @xmath180 where the vector notation has been dropped . the exact form of this equation can be found in lesieur ( 2008 ) . it can now be seen that a similar equation can be found for the fourier transform of the second moment of eq . a1 , and it is also clear that the result of this will include a third order term in @xmath170 on the right hand side . similarly an equation for the third order moments will include an integral over a term of fourth order moments ; this difficulty is of course a result of the non - linear nature of the flow arising from the @xmath181 term in the momentum equation . closure of this system of moments is accomplished by assuming that the fourth order moments are nearly gaussian ; hence the `` quasi - normal '' approximation . this approximation allows the fourth order moments to be written as sums of products of the second order moments , and because the third order moments can already be written as a function of second order moments , the system is closed at this level . a discussion of the accuracy of this approximation and tests of its rigor are found in lesieur ( 2008 ) and references therein . thus the origin of the overall form of eq ( 2 ) in the text can be seen . in general the integral in this equation will contain many terms that are quadratic in kinetic energy , helicity , and magnetic energy , and numerical solution of this integro - differential equation is necessary . it can be shown ( lesieur 2008 ) that energy is strictly conserved when integration over wavenumber space includes all triads of turbulent eddies whose wavenumbers ( k , p , q ) satisfy the requirement that @xmath182 ; thus interactions with @xmath183 include non - local interactions in wavenumber space . a complete tabulation of all the terms included on the right side of eq ( 1 ) is found in de young ( 1980 ) . in addition to a closure approximation , two other constraints are added to the right side of eq . ( 2 ) . in its simplest form , the quasi - normal approximation can , at late times , lead to negative energies in some portions of the spectra . this has been shown to be due to an eventual excess value building up in the third order moments . these moments have been shown experimentally to saturate , and a modification to the theory incorporates this effect by adding a linear damping term in the equation governing the growth of the third order moments which represents the deformation rate of eddies of size @xmath184 by larger scale eddies . this `` eddy damping '' stabilizes the growth rate of the third order moments and results in the eddy damped quasi - normal ( edqn ) version of the theory . a final modification guarantees the positive definite character of the spectra in all situations , not just at late times . this is the introduction of a markov process to remove excessive `` memory '' in the system on timescales of order of the large eddy turnover time , including removal of any time variations in the eddy damping term . with this step the formalism takes on the final form of the edqnm theory . specific forms for these modifications can be found in de young ( 1980 ) and lesieur ( 2008 ) . aloy , m.a . , ibaez , j.m . , mart , j - m , gmez , j - l . , & mller , e. 1999 , apj , 523 , l125 benson , a.j . , bower , r.g . , frenk , c.s . , lacey , c.g . , baugh , c.m . , & cole , s. 2003 , apj , 599 , 38 best , p.n . , kaiser , c.r . , heckman , t.m . , & kauffmann , g. 2006 , mnras , 368 , l67 bicknell , g.v . 1984 , apj , 286 , 68 brzan , l. , mcnamara , b.r . , nulsen , p. , carilli , c. , & wise , m.w . 2008 , apj , 686 , 859 bower , r.g . 2006 , mnras , 370 , 645 brown , g.l . , & roshko , a. 1974 , j.fl.mech , 64 , 775 brggen , m. , & kaiser , c.r 2001 , mnras , 325 , 676 brggen , m. , & kaiser , c.r 2002 , nature , 418 , 301 brggen , m. , heinz , s. , roediger , e. , ruszkowski , m. , & simionescu , a. 2007 , mnras , 380 , l67 cara , m. , & lister , m.l . 2008 , apj , 674 , 111 chandrasekhar , s. 1961 , hydrodynamic and hydromagnetic stability ( oxford : clarendon ) , chap . 11 clemens , n.t . , & mungal , m.g . 1995 , j.fl.mech , 284 , 171 cowie , l.l . , songaila , a. , hu , e.m . , & cohen , j.g . 1996 , aj , 112 , 839 croton , d.j . 2006 , mnras , 365 , 11 croton , d.j . , & farrar , g. 2008 , mnras , 386 , 2285 dahm , w. , & dimotakis , p.e . 1990 , j .. fl.mech , 217 , 299 de young , d.s . 1980 , apj , 241 , 81 de young , d.s . 1981 , nature , 293 , 43 de young , d.s . 1986 , apj , 307 , 62 de young , d.s . 1993 , apj , 405 , l13 de young , d.s . 2002 , the physics of extragalactic radio sources ( chicago : univ . chicago press ) de young , d.s . 2003 , mnras , 343 , 719 de young , d.s . 2006 , apj , 648 , 200 de young , d.s . , oneill , s.m . , & jones , t.w . 2008 , aspc , 388 , 343 dimotakis , p.e . , & brown , g.l . 1976 , j.fl.mech , 78 , 535 dimotakis , p.e . , miake - lye , r.c . , & papantoniou , d.a . 1983 , phys.fl . , 26 , 3185 donoso , e. , best , p.n . , & kauffmann , g. 2009 , mnras , 392 , 617 fabian , a.c . 2000 , mnras , 318 , l65 fabian , a.c . , celotti , a. , blundell , k.m . , kassim , n.e . , & perley , r.a . 2002 , mnras , 331 , 369 fanaroff , b.l . , & riley , j.m . 1974 , mnras , 167 , 31p ferrari , a. 1998 , araa , 36 , 539 freund , j.b . , lele , s.k . , & moin , p. 2000 , j.fl.mech , 421 , 229 gomez , t. , sagaut , p. , schilling , o. , & zhou , y. 2007 , phys . 19 , 48101 graham , j. , fabian , a.c . , & sanders , j.s . 2008 , mnras , 386 , 278 hardcastle , m.j . , alexander , p. , pooley , g.g . , & riley , j.m . 1997 , mnras , 288 , l1 hardcastle , m.j . , worrall , d.m . , birkinshaw , m. , laing , r.a . , & bridle , a.h . 2002 , mnras , 334 , 182 hardcastle , m.j . , worrall , d.m . , birkinshaw , m. , laing , r.a . , & bridle , a.h . 2005 , mnras , 358 , 843 hussein , h.j . , capp , s. , & george w.k . 1994 , j.fl.mech 258 , 31 jackson , c.a . , & wall , j.v . 1999 , mnras , 304 , 160 jones , t.w . , & de young , d.s . 2005 , apj , 624 , 586 laing , r.a . , parma , p. , de riter , h.r . , & fanti , r. 1999 , mnras , 306 , 513 laing , r.a . , & bridle , a.h . 2002 , mnras , 336 , 328 laing , r.a . , & bridle , a.h . 2004 , mnras , 348 , 1459 laing , r.a . , bridle , a.h . , parma , p. , feretti , l. , giovannini , g. , murgia , m. , & perley , r.a . 2008 , mnras , 386 , 657 ledlow , m.j . , & owen , f.n . 1996 , aj , 112 , 9 lesieur , m. , & ossia , s. 2000 , j. turb . , 1 , 7 lesieur , m. 2008 , turbulence in fluids , ( springer ) , 4th ed . li , h. , lapenta , g. , finn , j.m . , li , s. , & colgate , s.a . 2006 , apj . 643 , 92 madau , p. , ferguson , h.c . , dickinson , m.e . , giavalisco , m. , steidel , c.c . , & fruchter , a 1996 , mnras , 283 , 1388 mandelbaum , r. , mcdonald , p. , seljak , u. , & cen , r. 2003 , mnras , 344 , 776 mcnamara , b.r . , & nulsen , p.e.j . 2007 , araa , 45 , 117 mungal , m.g . , lozano , a. , & van cruyningen 1992 , exp.fl , 12 , 141 okamoto , t. , nemmen , r. , rodrigo , s. , & bower , r.g . 2008 , mnras , 385 , 161 oneill , s.m . , de young , d.s . , & jones , t.w . 2009 , apj , 694 , 1317 orszag , s.a . 1970 , j.fl.mech , 41 , 363 orszag , s.a . , & patterson , g.s . 1972 , phys.rev.lett , 28 , 76 owen , f.n . , & ledlow , m.j . 1997 , apjs , 108 , 41 owen , f.n . , eilek , j.a . , & kassim , n.e . 2000 , apj , 543 , 611 perucho , m. , hanasz , m. , mart , j - m . , & miralles , j - a . 2007 , phys.rev.e , 75 , 56312 pope , s.b . 2000 , turbulent flows ( cambridge : cambridge univ press ) pouquet , a. , frisch , u. , & lorat , j. 1976 , j.fl.mech 77 , 321 pouquet , a. , & patterson , g.s . 1978 , j.fl.mech , 85 , 305 rigby , e.e . , best , p.n . , & snellen , i. 2008 , mnras , 385 , 310 ruszkowski , m. , brggen , m. , & begelman , m.c . 2004 , apj , 615 , 675 rudnick , l. , & brown , s. 2009 , apj , 137 , 145 ryu , d. , jones , t.w . , & frank , a. 2000 , apj , 545 , 475 sanders , j.s . , & fabian , a.c . 2007 , mnras , 381 , 1381 sanders , j.s . , & fabian , a.c . 2008 , mnras , 390 , l93 sijacki , d. , springel , v. , di matteo , t. , & hernquist , l. 2007 , mnras , 380 , 877 spitzer , l. 1962 , the physics of fully ionized gases ( new york : wiley - interscience ) springel , v. et al . 2005 , nature , 435 , 629 staquet , c. , & godeferd , f.s . 1998 , j.fl.mech 360 , 295 tegmark , m. et al . , 2004 , phys.rev.d , 69 , 103501 turner , l. , & pratt , j. 2002 , j. phys . a , 35 , 781 vedula , p. , moser , r.d . , & zandonade , p.s . 2005 , phys . 17 , 55106 wang , w. , kaiser , c.r . , laing , r. , alexander , p. , pavlovski , g. , & knigge , c. 2009 , mnras , 397 , 1113 white , s.d.m . , & rees , m.j . 1978 , mnras , 183 , 341 white , s.d.m . , navarro , j.f . , evrard , a.e . , & frenk , c. s. 1993 , nature , 366 , 429 willott , c.j . , rawlings , s. , blundell , k.m . , lacy , m. , & eales , s. 2001 , mnras , 322 , 536 Abstract:

Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.

Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered . Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video . Paper: type ia supernovae ( sne ) have recently been used extensively for the measurement of relative distances to galaxies ( , hamuy 1996 ; filippenko & riess 1999 ; branch 1998 ; and riess , press & kirshner 1996 ) . with peak @xmath3-band absolute magnitudes ranging ( typically ) from @xmath4 to @xmath5 , type ia sne have been discovered in ever - increasing numbers at redshifts ( @xmath6 ) well out in the hubble flow the 29 type ia sne of the survey ( hamuy 1996 ) , supplemented by the seven new sne from the center for astrophysics ( cfa ) survey ( riess 1998 ) , are testament to this fact . the dispersion in the raw survey @xmath7-band hubble diagram alone is only @xmath8 , @xmath90.15mag tighter than the @xmath7-band relationship ( sakai 1999 ) . in recent years , it has become clear that type ia sne are not standard candles of constant luminosity . significant dispersion in their peak luminosities , particularly in the @xmath3 and @xmath7 bands , has now been unequivocally demonstrated ( , phillips 1993 ; hamuy 1996 ; riess 1996 , 1998 ; phillips 1999 ) ; fortuitously , though , these same groups emphasize that there is a strong correlation between sne light - curve shape and peak luminosity . this is perhaps best appreciated through figure 8 of phillips ( 1999 ) , in which the correlation between peak luminosity and decline rate @xmath10 is shown . @xmath10 corresponds to the decline in @xmath3-band magnitude from maximum to @xmath11 days after @xmath3 maximum . correcting the observed peak magnitudes for this decline rate effect results in a @xmath7-band hubble diagram dispersion of 0.14mag ( hamuy 1996 ) . while the hubble diagrams , whether they be raw or corrected for decline - rate effects , can provide highly accurate relative distances , the derivation of an actual hubble constant , h@xmath1 , requires that a locally - calibrated zero point be provided ; with the launch of @xmath12 , this zero point can now be provided via independent , cepheid - based , distance determinations for nearby type ia sne - host galaxies . providing such a zero point is the goal of the sandage / saha _ type ia sne hst calibration program _ ( saha 1997 , and references therein ) . to date , six galaxies have been targeted by the sandage / saha program ( ngc 3627 , 4496a , 4536 , 4639 , 5253 , and ic 4182 ) ; each galaxy s associated type ia sn , metallicity , and _ hst _ proposal i d number is listed in table [ tbl : galaxies ] . this list of six is supplemented by two others ngc 3368 ( host to sn 1998bu ) , from tanvir ( 1995 ) and ngc 4414 ( host to sn 1974 g ) , from turner ( 1998 ) . three further local type ia - host galaxies will be observed by sandage / saha during _ hst _ cycles 79 ( ngc 1316 , 4527 , and 3982 ) and , for completeness , are also listed in table [ tbl : galaxies ] . as part of the _ hst key project on the extragalactic distance scale , cepheid - based distance determinations have been made for 18 galaxies , including one local , calibrating , type ia sne - host ( ngc 4414 turner 1998 ) . this ensemble is now being employed as calibration for a variety of secondary distance indicators probing further into the hubble flow , including the relationship ( sakai 1999 ) , surface brightness fluctuations ( ferrarese 1999 ) , fundamental plane ( kelson 1999 ) , and , of course , type ia sne ( this work ) . _ this paper differs somewhat from these other calibrations of secondary methods in that we now focus on the recalibration of extant cepheid data . it presents results from a search for cepheids in all galaxies observed with _ hst that are host to type ia supernovae . the goal of the present analysis is to process the remaining non-_key project , _ hst - observed , type ia sne - host galaxies in a manner consistent with that employed throughout the earlier papers in our series . while parallel double - blind reductions were not employed for the present recalibration work ( as was done for papers i - xxiii ) , the philosophy adopted for the seven galaxies described herein _ is consistent with that used for our earlier _ key project galaxies . this ensures that these galaxies are on the same footing as our original sample of 18 , and provides a useful cross - check of the sandage / saha and tanvir independent reductions . a benefit of our re - analysis is that not only do we have a better understanding of the subtleties of accurately calibrating wf / pc and wfpc2 data , but we are in a position to take advantage of additional archive data for one of the galaxies ( ngc 5253 ) , that was not available to the original authors . _ _ _ _ _ in section [ previous ] , results from previous type ia supernova studies are briefly summarized . in section [ data ] , we briefly remind the reader of this standard _ hst key project _ reduction and calibration pipeline , then discuss the new photometric reductions , cepheid period - luminosity ( pl ) relations , and distances to each cepheid calibrator galaxy , and then compare them to previous results . the cepheid photometry for our reanalysis is provided in an appendix . section [ implications ] is devoted to the implications for h@xmath1 work implied by our uniform re - analysis of the local type ia sne calibrators ; these implications hold for all the empirical studies of table [ tbl : h0_ia ] ; for brevity , only two analyses ( those due to suntzeff 1999 and saha 1997 ) are followed in detail . the role of a possible metallicity correction to the cepheid - derived distances is discussed in section [ metallicity ] , while the local flow field and its impact upon h@xmath1 is described in section [ flow ] . we re - visit the type ia sne - predicted distance to the fornax cluster in section [ fornax ] . finally , our results are summarized in section [ summary ] . using their five cepheid - based distances to local type ia sne - host galaxies , supplemented with an indirectly inferred distance to ngc 3627 , saha ( 1997 ) derived zero points to their uncorrected @xmath3- and @xmath7-band hubble diagrams ( themselves , based equally upon the and asiago ( patat 1995 ) surveys ) . ignoring external systematic effects , their resulting hubble constant was @xmath13 . using only the uncorrected sample , but now including the @xmath14-band data , and ignoring those calibrators with poor photometry or without a direct cepheid - based distance determination , both hamuy ( 1996 ) and riess ( 1996 ) found @xmath15 , in agreement with saha et al . correcting for the light - curve shape - peak luminosity relationship , in both the high-@xmath16 _ and local calibrator sample ) , hamuy ( 1996 ) , riess ( 1996,1998 ) , phillips ( 1999 ) , and suntzeff ( 1999 ) , each found @xmath17 , despite the different approaches in the treatment of foreground and host galaxy extinction , correcting the peak magnitudes for light - curve shape results in an approximate @xmath18% increase in . _ a variety of other type ia sne - related h@xmath1 determinations populate the literature . the subtle differences in each study are tied to the details of either the high-@xmath16 or local calibrator sample selection . for example , a preliminary analysis from our team ( madore 1999 ) led to a value for the hubble constant of h@xmath1=@xmath19 . for that study though , only three of the six type ia sne employed had direct cepheid - calibrated distances ; indirect distances to two fornax cluster sne were inferred via the cepheid distance to cluster member ngc 1365 ( silbermann 1999 ; see also section [ fornax ] ) . in the analysis which follows we have chosen to restrict ourselves only to those eight sne which have _ direct cepheid - calibrated distances ; as madore rightly note , the inclusion of the two fornax sne has negligible impact upon the derived h@xmath1 . _ an alternative method , independent of the local , empirical calibration of the hubble constant , is the derivation of h@xmath1 based upon purely physical models of type ia sne explosions . this method will not be discussed in any detail in what follows , except to note that it is encouraging that the weighted mean of three recent _ theoretical _ type ia sne - h@xmath1 analyses ( hflich & khokhlov 1996 ; ruiz - lapuente 1996 ; iwamoto & nomoto 1998 ) is @xmath20 , in close agreement with the recent empirical values , to be discussed in section [ hamuy ] . table [ tbl : h0_ia ] provides a useful summary of these recent type ia sne - based h@xmath1 determinations , including both physical and empirical methodologies . where available ( and where relevant ) , an attempt has been made to list the number of sne included in the adopted hubble diagrams , as well as the number of local calibrators employed in deriving the associated zero points . the associated mean peak @xmath3-band magnitude for each sample is likewise provided ; the notes to table [ tbl : h0_ia ] clarify whether said mean applies to the high-@xmath16 sample or the local calibrators . seven type ia sne - host galaxies , six from the sandage / saha team ( ngc 4496a , 4536 , 4639 , 5253 , 3627 and ic 4182 ) and one from tanvir ( ngc 3368 ) , were extracted from the _ hst archive and processed with the _ key project s allframe ( photometry stetson 1994 ) and trial ( variable finding stetson 1996 ) pipeline , as documented thoroughly by stetson ( 1998 ) and hill ( 1998 ) . for papers i - xxiii of the _ key project , we carried out a ( real - time ) parallel reduction , based on both dophot and allframe , using at least two different methods for finding the cepheids . we included in the final analysis only those cepheids which were in common to both analyses , but for consistency , generally quoted only the allframe results . in the present case , the dophot results were already previously published by the sandage / saha team , we did not undertake a parallel dophot reduction and , thus , the methodology employed is not _ identical to that used in papers i - xxiii of this series . _ _ _ _ for the allframe@xmath21trial analysis described here , photometry , cepheid selection , and pl analyses were handled identical to each of our previous galaxies , no special treatment was afforded any of the cepheid samples herein , and only those cepheids with good quality @xmath7- _ and @xmath14-band data were considered . as described in sections [ n4639]-[n4496a ] , for several of the galaxies analyzed by saha et al . , these authors either ( a ) used a special pl - fitting scheme ( , ngc 4639 and 3627 ) , or ( b ) treated the @xmath14-band data specially in the derivation of the true modulus ( , ngc 4496a and ic 4182 ) . for those galaxies with peculiarities not encountered in earlier _ key project papers , details are provided in the appropriate subsections below . we discuss the reasons for the differences between previously published results and those in this paper , so that the reasons for the difference in the overall value of h@xmath22 derived in this paper are clear . as it turns out , there is not a single explanation for the differences we see compared to our standard pipeline processing procedure , but a variety of reasons . the full set of cepheids for each of the seven galaxies , is listed in appendix a , along with positional and photometric information . as alluded to previously , we have only retained those cepheids which have high quality @xmath7- _ and @xmath14-band photometry ; we made a conscious decision to not retain the lower quality candidates . because of this , the cepheid numbers in tables a1-a7 are typically smaller than the number listed in the corresponding saha dophot analysis , since saha provided a complete listing of both bona fide _ and lower - quality suspected cepheid candidates . epoch - by - epoch photometry , light - curves , and finding charts , for all the cepheids discovered in this work are available through the _ hst key project s web page . _ _ _ _ _ the _ key project s data were calibrated without the adoption of an explicit , analytic , correction for charge transfer effects ( cte ) , although the hill ( 1998 ) calibration employed did correct for it in the mean . on the other hand , the current data _ were analyzed with a developmental calibration which does treat cte ( stetson 1998 ) , although our quoted moduli , and the subsequent h@xmath1 analysis which follows , adopt the mould ( 1999b ) transformation from the stetson ( 1998 ; s98 ) scale to that of hill ( 1998 ; h98 ) ; this amounts to mean shifts of @xmath210.02mag ( @xmath7 ) and @xmath210.04mag ( @xmath14 ) , in the sense of h98 being greater than s98 . this corresponds to a @xmath210.07mag shift ( s98@xmath23h98 ) in the true modulus , and retains consistency with previous ( and current ) papers in this series . the two systems do agree at the @xmath91@xmath24 level , but unresolved discrepancies between the two have led us to conservatively adopt the hill ( 1998 ) scale , in what follows . _ _ ngc 4639 , host to sn 1990n , is one of three local calibrators situated in the virgo cluster . of the 38 galaxies ( to date ) with cepheid - based distances ( ferrarese 1999 ; table 3 ) , ngc 4639 is the current record - holder ; saha ( 1997 ) derive a true modulus of @xmath25 , based upon 17 cepheid candidates . our allframe@xmath21trial analysis uncovered 17 high - quality cepheid candidates , seven of which were in common with the saha ( 1997 ; table 4 ) sample . the majority of our sample ( , 14/17 ) reside on chips 2 and 3 . positional and photometric information for the full sample is given in table [ tbl : n4639_ceph ] . the first entry of table [ tbl : ceph_comp ] shows that the agreement in assigned mean @xmath7-band magnitudes , for the seven cepheids in common between table [ tbl : n4639_ceph ] and saha ( table 4 ) , is excellent . however , as is the case for many of the galaxies discussed in this paper , the agreement in the @xmath14-band is somewhat inferior ( although the agreement does hold at the @xmath26 level ) . our @xmath7- and @xmath14-band pl relations are shown in figure [ fig : n4639 ] . standard pl - fitting to the full sample results in @xmath27 , @xmath28 , e@xmath29 , and @xmath30 ; the quoted uncertainties simply reflect the rms scatter of the fits , which includes the effects of the finite width of the instability strip as well as of random observational noise . a full accounting of the error budget ( detailed in table [ tbl : error ] ) leads to our final adopted value of @xmath31 . in comparison , recall that saha ( 1997 ) found @xmath25 , our result places ngc 4639 0.2mag nearer than that favored by saha et al ( although still in agreement at the @xmath32 level ) . saha ( 1997 ) interpret their dophot pl relations as showing evidence for significant scatter beyond that encountered in previous galaxies ( indicative of a substantial component of differential reddening ) , and thereafter employ a weighting scheme in averaging the sample of de - reddened cepheid moduli , in order to derive the galaxy s true modulus . we would suggest that upon closer inspection the evidence presented therein for differential reddening is perhaps not as suggestive as might at first seem . first , of the 15 cepheids employed by saha ( neglecting the same three which they discard in deriving the true modulus , but which are still plotted in their apparent @xmath7- and @xmath14-band moduli pl relations - , their c1-v3 , c3-v8 , and c3-v9 ) , only two lie outside the lmc @xmath7-band @xmath33 instability strip width ( @xmath34mag ) . our analysis ( upper panel of figure [ fig : n4639 ] ) found one candidate lying outside this region . formally , the random uncertainties associated with the dereddened pl fit to the respective samples ( , entry r3 of table [ tbl : error ] ) are @xmath35mag ( allframe ) and @xmath36mag ( dophot ) , so while the scatter in the saha dereddened moduli distribution is marginally larger than that found in our allframe@xmath21trial analysis , in neither case is the scatter anomalously large in comparison with the entire set of _ hst - observed galaxies . a simple visual inspection of our allframe pl relations ( and the listed @xmath7- and @xmath14-band scatter in each panel ) for ngc 4639 ( figure [ fig : n4639 ] ) , in comparison with those for the other galaxies in this study ( figures [ fig : n4536]-[fig : n4496a ] ) , do not show a significantly larger scatter . one can also do a formal fit to the distribution of cepheids in the differential reddening diagnostic plane ( , @xmath37 versus @xmath38 - figure 7 of saha 1997 ) for both the allframe@xmath21trial and dophot datasets , the formal slope of the least squares fit is @xmath39 . a slope of @xmath40 is expected in the case of photometric scatter alone , while a slope of @xmath41 is expected in the case where differential reddening is substantial - , statistically , we feel there is no compelling reason to invoke any substantial differential reddening component , and for these reasons , we have treated ngc 4639 in the same way as all of the other galaxies we have analyzed , taking the unweighted mean as the representative final galaxy modulus . the differing weighting schemes employed account for half of the discrepancy between the two analyses , while the remainder is due to the aforementioned ( unresolved ) @xmath14-band disagreement . _ ngc 4536 was host to sn 1981b , for which the light curve and photometry are of the highest quality . saha ( 1996a ) derived moduli of @xmath42 , @xmath43 , and @xmath44 , and a total line - of - sight reddening of e@xmath45 , based upon the 27 highest - quality cepheids ( , @xmath46 ) in their table 3 . our allframe@xmath21trial analysis resulted in the sample of 39 candidates listed in table [ tbl : n4536_ceph ] . the @xmath7- and @xmath14-band pl relations are shown in figure [ fig : n4536 ] ; because of incompleteness below periods of 20 days , the formal pl fits were restricted to the 27 cepheids for which @xmath47d , and are represented by the solid lines ( , @xmath48 and @xmath49 ) . our final true modulus is @xmath50 . our predicted true distance modulus appears 0.15mag discrepant with that of saha ( 1996a ) ( @xmath44 ) . examining the saha data on a chip - by - chip basis , demonstrates though that this discrepancy results ( partially ) from what appears to be a discrepant chip within their dataset . if we apply the same color ( @xmath51 ) , period ( p@xmath5220d ) , and quality - index ( qi@xmath53 ) cuts adopted by saha ( 1996a ) , and then perform the standard pl fitting to ( a ) the sum of chips @xmath54 ( 17 cepheids ) , and ( b ) chip 2 alone ( 12 cepheids ) , we find that ( a ) @xmath55(random ) and ( b ) @xmath56(random ) . the upper panel of figure [ fig : n4536_mod_comp ] illustrates this 0.66mag chip 2 discrepancy present within the saha dataset , where the solid symbols represent the 17 chip 1 + 3 + 4 cepheids and the open symbols the 12 chip 2 cepheids ; the solid and dotted horizontal lines correspond to the unweighted mean of each respective sample . the lower panel of figure [ fig : n4536_mod_comp ] shows that such a discrepancy does not exist in our allframe@xmath21trial dataset . because the saha chips 1 , 3 , and 4 , are self - consistent , we feel that the true modulus derived from the mean of the cepheids therein @xmath57 represents a better option than the originally published @xmath44 , as reflected by its entry under @xmath58 in table [ tbl : distances ] . the fact that our allframe@xmath21trial distance to ngc 4536 is 0.19mag greater than that derived from chips 1 + 3 + 4 of the saha sample is consistent with that expected , based upon a comparison of mean magnitudes for the cepheids in common in the two datasets ( see relevant entry in table [ tbl : ceph_comp ] ) . host to the highly - reddened , but well - photometered , sn 1989b ( wells 1994 ) , ngc 3627 is the most recently observed galaxy by the sandage / saha type ia sne calibration team . the wfpc2 field is replete with dust lanes , and suffers from an extremely bright background . based upon a sub - sample of 25 cepheids , drawn from a master list of 68 , saha ( 1999 ) derive an true modulus of @xmath59 . the allframe@xmath21trial analysis for ngc 3627 proved to be more challenging than that encountered for any previous galaxy . the problem stems , in part , from a distinct lack of bright local standards upon which to base the calibration . there are many bright objects in the field , but they are decidedly non - stellar , forcing the use of those comparatively faint calibrators which successfully avoid the dust lanes . in addition , even after eliminating all likely star clusters and background galaxies , the remaining stellar images are still @xmath950% broader than in the rest of the _ hst - observed galaxies . in practice , what this means , is that the median aperture correction ( in going from 2 to 5 pixel radius ) , for ngc 3627 , is @xmath600.362mag , while the median for all the other galaxies is @xmath600.192mag , there is a 0.17mag difference in the aperture corrections for ngc 3627 . _ the source of this discrepancy is not obvious . perhaps all of the ngc 3627 observations were out of focus ; however , contemporaneous _ key project wfpc2 ngc 3319 observations do not deviate from the median aperture correction noted previously . second , perhaps ngc 3627 is extremely rich in star clusters which are incorrectly being identified as stars . a third possibility is that the extremely high surface brightness of ngc 3627 is problematic ; however , the form of the stellar images in the low surface brightness regions of our frames do not appear appreciably different from those in the high surface brightness parts of the same images . _ in what follows , we have chosen the conservative approach , and adopted the second option - , using the full sample s median aperture corrections and making use of all of the data available to us . instead of the standard 0.05mag random photometry uncertainty used for other galaxies in this study ( , r1 in table [ tbl : error ] ) , for ngc 3627 we have assumed the more generous value of 0.15mag , to reflect the greater uncertainty associated with the adopted aperture corrections . our results should be reliable at this level . in total , 36 high - quality cepheid candidates were discovered , the properties for which are listed in table [ tbl : n3627_ceph ] . eighteen of our cepheids are in common with the saha ( 1999 ; table 4 ) sample , and as can be seen by the relevant entry to table [ tbl : ceph_comp ] , the agreement in the mean @xmath7-band magnitudes is excellent , although the @xmath14-band agreement is somewhat inferior ( agreement at the 2@xmath24 level only ) . based upon this common sample , we _ a priori expect that our allframe true modulus should be 0.17mag _ greater than that of saha ( 1999 ) . _ _ the pl relations for ngc 3627 are shown in figure [ fig : n3627 ] , and possibly provide evidence for the presence of differential reddening , by the excess scatter beyond that expected from the finite width of the lmc instability strip . larger errors as a result of the difficulty in working against the high background may also contribute to the higher scatter . incompleteness , for p@xmath6125d , is apparent , so our preferred allframe@xmath21trial distance has been based upon the 17 cepheids with periods in excess of 25d . standard pl fitting , incorporating the full error budget , yields @xmath62 . had we included cepheids with periods less than 25days , our derived distance to ngc 3627 would decrease . in contrast , saha ( 1999 ) derive the significantly larger modulus of @xmath59 . this 0.16mag _ greater modulus is at odds with that which we had predicted on the basis of the 18 cepheids in common ( recall , we expected the dophot modulus to be 0.17mag _ smaller than our allframe modulus ) . the source of the discrepancy appears to be due to the sample of cepheids used by both groups which are _ not part of the aforementioned `` common '' subset . restricting ourselves to only those cepheids used by each group in their respective pl fitting ( , the 25 used by saha and the 17 used in our re - analysis ) , we show in figure [ fig : n3627_mod_comp ] the distribution of individually dereddened true moduli for each sample . _ _ _ the upper panel of figure [ fig : n3627_mod_comp ] shows the 25 saha ( 1999 ) cepheids , while the lower panel shows our 17 ; in both panels , the filled symbols represent the five cepheids which occur in both samples . the horizontal lines represent the unweighted mean of the dereddened moduli , hence the @xmath63 shown in the upper panel , which differs from the aforementioned saha value of @xmath64 ( which represents their favored weighted mean ) . several points should be made regarding figure [ fig : n3627_mod_comp ] first , the mean magnitudes of the ( small ) overlap sample are in good agreement , as was found for the larger sample described earlier . indeed , just using these five cepheids in common leads to @xmath65(random ) , _ regardless of whose photometry is adopted . of the 0.23mag discrepancy noted in figure [ fig : n3627_mod_comp ] , 0.14mag is being driven by the four saha cepheids with @xmath66 ; removal of these four outliers leads to @xmath67(random ) , in better agreement with our favored @xmath68(random ) . further support for their excision comes from the fact that their inferred reddenings are all negative , as witnessed by their populating the lower - right quadrant of saha et al.s figure 11 . the residual 0.09mag offset can be traced primarily to those @xmath69d cepheids in the saha sample which were not recovered in our analysis ; those saha cepheids _ not included in our analysis ( , the 20 open squares in the upper panel of figure [ fig : n3627_mod_comp ] ) , appear to lie , in the mean , 0.14mag beyond their five which overlap our sample . conversely , again in the mean , our cepheids _ not included in the saha analysis ( , the 12 open circles in the lower panel of figure [ fig : n3627_mod_comp ] ) _ are self - consistent with the overlap sample . _ _ _ _ a clearer way in which to express the above is to simply note that the median _ and mean @xmath70 of our sample of 17 cepheids are equivalent ( @xmath71 versus 30.06 , respectively ) , while for the saha ( 1999 ) sample of 25 cepheids , the median and mean differ by 0.19mag ( @xmath72 versus 30.29 , respectively ) . we would argue , in this case , that the saha _ median @xmath70 is a more robust measure of the true dophot distance to ngc 3627 , in agreement with that favored by our allframe@xmath21trial analysis . _ _ ngc 3368 was not part of the original sandage / saha sne ia program , simply because at the time of proposing , the galaxy had not played host to a suitable sn ; this fortuitously changed on 1998 may 9 , with the eruption of sn 1998bu . while the sn itself is highly extinguished , its light - curve and photometry are of the highest quality , and thus ideally suited for the h@xmath1 analysis which follows . tanvir ( 1995 ) , as part of their leo i group study , had earlier derived a cepheid - based distance to ngc 3368 of @xmath73 ( after addition of the 0.05@xmath74mag `` long - vs - short exposure '' correction - casertano & mutchler 1998 ) . unlike the case for the _ key project sample , the roll angle was not fixed from epoch - to - epoch for ngc 3368 . hence , a master coordinate system was defined relative to the first ( chronologically - speaking ) epoch chip 2 image , and the allframe reduction performed on all four wfpc2 chips simultaneously . _ eleven candidates were identified , their location in the resulting pl - plane denoted by the filled circles in figure [ fig : n3368 ] . an incompleteness bias , for periods less than @xmath75 days , not apparent in the published data of tanvir ( 1995 ; figure 3 ) , is clearly present . because tanvir did not include positional information for their seven cepheid candidates , we identified their subset , within our larger dataset , based upon their proximity to one another in the pl - plane . their sample corresponds to cepheids c03 , c05 , c06 , c07 , c08 , c10 , and c11 , of table [ tbl : n3368_ceph ] . for these seven cepheids in common between the two studies , our allframe mean @xmath7- and @xmath14-band magnitudes are @xmath76 and @xmath77mag brighter , respectively , than those of tanvir et al ( see table [ tbl : ceph_comp ] ) . the substantial differences in these mean magnitudes remains unresolved at present , but can be revisited once tanvir publish the full photometry for their cepheids and local standards . we note in passing that identifying such standards for the allframe analysis proved challenging . bearing in mind the aforementioned incompleteness bias below p=20d , we adopt a final modulus based upon the 7 candidates in table [ tbl : n3368_ceph ] with periods in excess of this cutoff , @xmath78 . ngc 5253 represents one of the two wf / pc galaxies ( supplemented with some newer wfpc2 data , in the case of ngc 5253 ) analyzed for this work ; the second , ic 4182 will be discussed in section [ i4182 ] . the reduction of the earlier wf / pc photometry proved challenging . the original dophot analysis led to @xmath79 and e@xmath80 ( saha 1995 ) . the large uncertainty on the latter allows for consistency with the measured galactic foreground reddening e@xmath81 ( schlegel 1998 ) . ngc 5253 is unique in that it played host to two potential type ia sne local calibrators , sn 1895b and 1972e . the quality of the photometry associated with sn 1895b is of low quality , and therefore we do not consider it further . the lightcurve and photometry for sn 1972e ( hamuy 1996 ) are of a decidedly higher quality ( although not of the same level as those discussed in sections [ n4639 ] to [ n3368 ] , primarily because observations did not begin until 5d past the peak , and so one must extrapolate back to the peak using template lightcurves ) and will be incorporated into the h@xmath1 analysis of section [ implications ] . sn 1972e is situated well in the outskirts of ngc 5253 , @xmath82kpc from the optical center see figure 1 of saha ( 1995 ) . the intrinsic reddening local to sn 1972e is measured by suntzeff ( 1999 ) to be e@xmath83 ; if this is taken as a lower limit on the mean intrinsic reddening , then in combination with the aforementioned galactic foreground reddening , the implied total line - of - sight reddening is e@xmath84 . because both wf / pc and wfpc2 data exist for ngc 5253 , slightly different reduction and calibration steps were employed . first , for the wfpc2 data , the stetson ( 1998 ) @xmath14-band calibration and cte corrections , based upon @xmath85 cen and ngc 2419 , were used . second , the @xmath7-band images were not taken with the usual f555w filter , but with f547 m ; the f547 m calibration is derived from seven observations of @xmath85 cen taken with the gain=14 electronics , at odds with the gain=7 electronics employed in the ngc 5253 observations . the @xmath85 cen zeropoints were therefore corrected with a ( gain=7)@xmath60(gain=14 ) zeropoint correction derived from f555w data on @xmath85 cen ; a separate correction was applied to each chip . the separately calibrated wf / pc and wfpc2 data for ngc 5253 differ by @xmath86mag in v , in the sense of wfpc2 being brighter , and @xmath87mag in i. the weighted average was then constructed and compared with the ground - based photometry from john tonry ( as reported in table 2 of saha 1995 ) . this average is heavily weighted in favor of the wf / pc observations , simply because of the far greater number of observations . we note also that object 3a in saha et al.s ( 1995 ) table 2 turned out to be a clump of @xmath88 stars of comparable brightness in the higher - quality wfpc2 data , and was eliminated from the comparison with tonry s ground - based data . the @xmath7-band magnitudes differed by @xmath89 , in the sense of the ground - based photometry being brighter , and the @xmath14-band magnitudes differed by @xmath90 ( in the same sense ) . in comparison , saha ( 1995 ) applied a 0.14mag f555w zeropoint contamination correction , and found agreement with tonry s ground - based photometry at the level of @xmath91 ( @xmath7-band , in the sense of tonry being fainter ) and @xmath92 ( @xmath14-band , in the sense of tonry being brighter ) . because our re - analysis is anchored to the higher - quality wfpc2 data , an _ a posteriori contamination correction is not needed . in summary , based upon the tonry ground - based photometry , the saha ( 1995 ) reference star photometry , after application of their contamination correction , is @xmath93mag ( v ) and @xmath94mag ( i ) brighter than our allframe photometry , which would correspond to an _ a priori predicted allframe true modulus 0.04mag nearer than that of saha ( 1995 ) . _ _ seven cepheid candidates were identified in our allframe analysis ( see table [ tbl : n5253_ceph ] for the relevant properties ) , five of which were in common with those of saha ( 1995 ) . the remaining cepheid candidates listed in table 4 of saha ( 1995 ) were examined , but were either not recovered or ( more usually ) the light curve quality was not very high or the cepheids were located too close to the edge of the chip . the pl fit , based upon the full allframe sample of seven cepheids , is shown in figure [ fig : n5253 ] . the inferred apparent moduli @xmath95 and @xmath96 are significantly smaller ( , 0.15mag and 0.27mag in @xmath7 and @xmath14 , respectively ) than those favored by saha et al , and at odds with the conclusions of the previous paragraph , based upon the bright calibrator stars in the field . we discuss the reasons for this difference below . there are five cepheids in common between saha ( 1995 ) and table [ tbl : n5253_ceph ] from our census , c02-c06 correspond to saha et al.s c4-v2 , c3-v2 , c4-v4 c3-v3 , and c1-v2 , respectively . table [ tbl : ceph_comp ] shows that the mean magnitudes for these five cepheids agree extremely well . identical moduli ( both apparent and true ) and reddenings to those favored by our allframe analysis are found when using the saha et al . dophot data , provided the same cepheid sample is used . the reason for the difference with saha et al.s results is that of the five cepheids included in their @xmath14-band analysis their c2-v3 , c3-v6 , c4-v3 , c3-v2 , and c4-v2 only the latter two were included in our final sample . our photometry has benefited from the wfpc2 supplement not available in 1994 . in some cases , this has allowed us to better eliminate / include marginal cepheid candidates from the original saha analysis . for example , c1-v2 and c3-v3 were discounted in the @xmath14-band analysis by saha because of difficulty in assigning their mean magnitudes , while we found no reason to eliminate them based on their photometry ; both are clearly consistent with the pl fit of figure [ fig : n5253 ] , unlike the situation which faced saha ( their figure 5 ; lower panel ) . on the other hand , ( i ) we did not recover their c2-v3 ; ( ii ) c4-v3 sits on a bad column ; and ( iii ) the lightcurve of c3-v6 is clearly non - cepheid - like , even in their own data ( their figure 4 ) . we have treated the seven cepheids in our final sample in a manner consistent with all of the other galaxies in the _ key project , and see no reason to reject any of them , based upon our allframe@xmath21trial analysis . _ we note also that our inferred mean reddening ( e@xmath97 ) , is larger than that found by saha ( 1995 ) ( e@xmath80 ) . our higher value of reddening is in better agreement with other estimates of the reddening ( recall , the galactic foreground reddening is e@xmath98 schlegel 1998 ) . in addition , over the inner @xmath99 ( half of our cepheids lie within @xmath100 of this region ) , the total line - of - sight reddening ( from @xmath101h@xmath102 calzetti 1997 ) is e@xmath103 . in summary , our adopted distance modulus for ngc 5253 , incorporating the full error budget , is @xmath104 . the main difference from that of the published saha ( 1995 ) analysis ( , @xmath79 ) is due to the difference in adopted cepheid samples . the small scatter in our allframe pl relation and individual light curves , combined with the larger inferred reddening value , plus larger time baseline of the data analyzed here ( in a manner consistent with all previous _ key project galaxies ) , all give us confidence in the cepheid sample adopted in this paper . _ an independent check of our ( and saha et al.s ) conclusions is provided by the sakai ( 1999 ) distance determination based upon the magnitude of the tip of the red giant branch ( trgb ) ; a preliminary analysis , using only ngc 5253 halo stars , places the tip at @xmath14=23.99 . for a tip absolute magnitude m@xmath105 ( ferrarese 1999 ) , and a galactic foreground extinction a@xmath106mag ( schlegel 1998 ) , the inferred trgb distance to ngc 5253 would be @xmath107 . this value for @xmath108 lies between saha ( @xmath109 ) and our current result ( @xmath110 ) , in ( dis)agreement with both of the cepheid - based distance determinations at the @xmath111 level . , a distance modulus of @xmath112 can be derived for sn 1972e which , like the sakai ( 1999 ) t - rgb distance to the host galaxy , lies half - way between our new cepheid distance ( @xmath110 ) and the original saha ( 1995 ) result ( @xmath109 ) . ] an ultimate resolution to the discrepancy between each of these approaches to the distance of ngc 5253 is still forthcoming . we should stress that the larger random uncertainty associated with our allframe@xmath21trial distance ensures that under the weighting scheme employed in section [ implications ] , ngc 5253 , by itself , does not overly influence our final result . in passing , we note that the formal saha solution of @xmath109 was not adopted in the subsequent sandage ( 1996 ) and saha ( 1997 ) h@xmath1 analyses ; instead , a true modulus of @xmath113 appears to have been adopted . ic 4182 is the host galaxy for the sne ia calibrator sn 1937c . while the photographic calibration of the sn 1937c lightcurve is of lower quality ( in comparison with the sne of sections [ n4639 ] to [ n3368 ] ) , the quality of the lightcurve itself is high , and for that reason is included in the h@xmath1 analysis of section [ implications ] . the original dophot reduction for this galaxy uncovered 27 high - quality cepheids ( saha 1994 ) ; the published moduli were @xmath114 and @xmath115 . the inferred reddening e()=@xmath116 is clearly unphysical , which led saha to assume @xmath117 . for the allframe analysis , the calibration adopted parallels that of section [ n5253 ] and stetson ( 1998 ) , although in this case there were no supplementary wfpc2 data . twenty - eight cepheid candidates were identified ( properties as noted in table [ tbl : i4182_ceph ] ) , 27 of which were in common with those in table 3 of saha ( 1994 ) . as can be seen from inspection of table [ tbl : ceph_comp ] , there is a difference in the photometry for these cepheids in common the stetson ( 1998 ) allframe mean magnitudes are 0.038mag ( @xmath7 ) and 0.119mag ( @xmath14 ) brighter than the saha dophot magnitudes . the pl relations , and associated fits , for the 28 cepheids of table [ tbl : i4182_ceph ] are shown in figure [ fig : i4182 ] . our adopted allframe@xmath21trial true modulus , with the full error accounting , of @xmath118 ( table [ tbl : distances ] ) is identical to the saha ( 1994 ) result of @xmath119 , although this excellent agreement in true modulus is somewhat misleading . specifically , our re - analysis led to a formal value of the reddening of e()=@xmath120 , while saha found e()=@xmath121 . to avoid any bias , our quoted true modulus includes the correction for the small , but negative , reddening implied by our cepheid data ; saha applied no such correction . we note in passing that the galactic foreground reddening along the line - of - sight to ic 4182 is e()=@xmath122 ( schlegel 1998 ) , consistent with our cepheid - derived mean reddening . preliminary reduction of ground - based photometry of ic 4182 , provided by m. pierce , confirms the validity of our adopted zeropoints at the level of @xmath123mag , within the accuracy of the ground - based data . further confirmation of the ground - based tie - in is underway . in the case of sn 1960f , the light - curve shape and photographic calibration are of low quality ( see schaefer 1996 ) . indeed , suntzeff ( 1999 ) and earlier papers in their series , do not include this sn in their h@xmath1 analysis because of its questionable quality . for completeness , however , we have re - analyzed the data for its host galaxy , ngc 4496a , and provide solutions for h@xmath1 with and without its inclusion in the hubble diagram zero points , in section [ implications ] . based upon 44 cepheids with p@xmath5218d , color @xmath124 , and quality index q@xmath53 , saha ( 1996b ) found @xmath125 and e()[email protected] . our allframe@xmath21trial re - analysis uncovered 94 cepheids ( table [ tbl : n4496a_ceph ] ) , the pl relations for which are shown in figure [ fig : n4496a ] . restricting ourselves to the 51 cepheids with p@xmath5225d , to minimize the effects of incompleteness bias ( apparent in figure [ fig : n4496a ] ) , our distance modulus for ngc 4496a is @xmath127 . our modulus is consistent with the published saha ( 1996b ) value . in their h@xmath1 analyses , sandage ( 1996 ) and saha ( 1997 ) do not adopt their published modulus ( , @xmath125 ) , and instead adopt the apparent @xmath7-band modulus ( , @xmath128 ) in its place . for consistency with standard practice in the _ key project , we employ the true modulus @xmath70 , and not the apparent modulus @xmath38 , in section [ implications ] . _ table [ tbl : distances ] summarizes the analysis and discussion of sections [ n4639]-[n4496a ] . column ( 2 ) lists the new allframe@xmath21trial distances derived in the current study , while those values originally published in the tanvir ( 1995 ) and saha ( 1994,1995,1996ab,1997,1999 ) papers are provided in column ( 4 ) . the unweighted mean offset between the two datasets is @xmath129mag , while the weighted mean is @xmath130mag , a discrepancy at the @xmath92@xmath24 level . neglecting ic 4182 , since the saha ( 1994 ) uncertainty of @xmath131mag appears to be too small ,- band problems which led saha ( 1994 ) to infer a highly negative reddening for the ic 4182 cepheids , their quoted true modulus uncertainty ( @xmath131mag ) is significantly smaller than that associated with any of their other six galaxies ( see column ( 4 ) of table [ tbl : distances ] ) , and is also smaller than the uncertainty associated with the true modulus of the lmc , upon which the relative distance is based . ] yields @xmath132mag and @xmath133mag . further , neglecting ngc 5253 , due to its extreme outlier status , results in @xmath134mag and @xmath135mag , similar to what was found using the full sample of seven galaxies . using the result based upon this full sample , @xmath91/2 of the 0.12mag discrepancy can be traced to unresolved photometric calibration issues ( see table [ tbl : ceph_comp ] ) , with the remainder ascribed to the different cepheid samples and pl - fitting methodology employed . again , as there exist serious concerns regarding either the dophot cepheid sample or photometry , for each of the seven galaxies analyzed , applying an ad hoc _ a posteriori `` averaging '' of the dophot and allframe distance moduli is _ not recommended . consistent with the general _ key project practice of adopting the allframe results , we do so here as well . _ _ _ column ( 3 ) of table [ tbl : distances ] presents the true moduli favored by the standard _ key project pl - fitting methodology employed in the current study , but using the tabulated saha and tanvir photometry , while column ( 5 ) shows the true moduli used by sandage ( 1996 ) and saha ( 1997 ) in their analyses ( c.f . column 4 ) . table [ tbl : supernovae ] lists the adopted photometry and sne light curve characteristics for each of these nearby calibrators ; the peak luminosities of the sne ( columns 7 - 9 ) were calculated using the @xmath136 values of table [ tbl : distances ] . how the adoption of these subsets of true moduli ( table [ tbl : distances ] ) and sne photometry ( table [ tbl : supernovae ] ) impacts upon the derivation of h@xmath1 is explored in section [ implications ] . _ given the distance moduli derived from our allframe@xmath21trial re - analysis of the local type ia sne - host galaxies of table [ tbl : distances ] ( column 2 ) , we are now in a position to calibrate the distant sample of sne comprising the clan - tololo - based hubble diagrams . two approaches are considered here one based upon the adoption of an absolute magnitude - peak luminosity correlation correction ( section [ hamuy ] , paralleling suntzeff 1999 ) , and one with no correction ( section [ sandage ] , paralleling saha 1997 ) . this is not meant to be an exhaustive replication of all previous type ia sne - based h@xmath1 determinations , nor is one warranted ; for convenience , we have chosen the two extremes in the treatment of sne lightcurves . while a variety of different approaches have been taken ( , phillips 1993 ; tammann & sandage 1995 ; hamuy 1996 ; saha 1997 ; riess 1998 ; phillips 1999 ; jha 1999 ) , here we are simply interested in exploring the effects of our new distance determinations upon the zero points of the two extrema . because all empirically - based studies listed in table [ tbl : h0_ia ] rest squarely upon the zero point defined by the same local calibrators , the differential effect is essentially identical , regardless of the details in the treatment of the distant sample . we employ the reddening - corrected m@xmath137 hubble relations described by suntzeff ( 1999 ) and phillips ( 1999 ) . following suntzeff et al . , we adopt the zero points , coefficient uncertainties , and hubble diagram fit dispersions derived from the full sample of 35 clan - tololo / cfa type ia sne ; coefficient uncertainties and dispersions were kindly provided by mark phillips . the fits to the decline rate versus peak luminosity relation from phillips ( 1999 ) were derived from the low - extinction ( , e()@xmath610.05 ) subset of 18 type ia sne in the clan - tololo / cfa sample . while the suntzeff ( 1999 ) fits included corrections for both galactic and host galaxy reddening , the phillips fits include only foreground galactic reddening , although it should be stressed that the zero points for these two sets agree to @xmath138 . our adopted relations are represented by the following expressions for h@xmath1 in @xmath3 , @xmath7 , and @xmath14 . @xmath139- \nonumber \\ & & 1.010(\pm0.934)\big[\delta m_{15}(b)_t-1.1\big]^2 + 28.653(\pm0.042)\big\ } , \label{eq : hamuy_b } \\ \log{\rm h}_\circ(v ) & = & 0.2\big\{{\rm m^{max}_v}-0.672(\pm0.396)\big[\delta m_{15}(b)_t-1.1\big]- \nonumber \\ & & 0.633(\pm0.742)\big[\delta m_{15}(b)_t-1.1\big]^2 + 28.590(\pm0.037)\big\ } , \label{eq : hamuy_v } \\ \log{\rm h}_\circ(i ) & = & 0.2\big\{{\rm m^{max}_i}-0.853(\pm0.214)\big[\delta m_{15}(b)_t-1.1\big]+28.219(\pm0.034)\big\ } , \label{eq : hamuy_i}\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath140 e@xmath141 represents the sum of e@xmath142 ( , foreground galactic reddening ) and e@xmath143 ( , intrinsic sn reddening ) from table 5 of suntzeff ( 1999 ) . for sn 1989b , we assign e@xmath144 ( wells 1994 ) , for sn 1960f , e@xmath145 ( schaefer 1996 ) , and for sn 1974 g , e@xmath146 ( schaefer 1998 ) . the dispersions for the fits of equations [ eq : hamuy_b]-[eq : hamuy_i ] are @xmath147 , @xmath148 , and @xmath149 ( phillips 1999 , priv comm ) . suntzeff ( 1999 ) provide a zeropoint to equations [ eq : hamuy_b]-[eq : hamuy_i ] using the following absolute distances to the host galaxies of five type ia sne ( 1 ) @xmath25 for sn 1990n in ngc 4639 ; ( 2 ) @xmath44 for sn 1981b in ngc 4536 ; ( 3 ) @xmath150 for sn 1998bu in ngc 3368 ; ( 4 ) @xmath151 for sn 1937c in ic 4182 ; and ( 5 ) @xmath152 for sn 1972e in ngc 5253 . the adopted moduli were then paired with the corresponding sn s apparent peak magnitude ( columns 3 - 5 of table 4 ) and intrinsic reddening ( sum of columns 10 and 11 of table 5 in suntzeff 1999 ) , in order to derive m@xmath153 . these peak luminosities and associated decline rates @xmath154 were then used in conjunction with equations [ eq : hamuy_b]-[eq : hamuy_i ] to derive a color- and sn - dependent h@xmath1 . the weighted average of the resulting set of hubble constants was h@xmath155kms@xmath156mpc@xmath156 . before demonstrating how our new distances to the galaxies in question ( column 2 of table [ tbl : distances ] ) impact upon the suntzeff ( 1999 ) value of h@xmath155 , we note the following : first , suntzeff use a ratio of total - to - selective absorption of r@xmath157 , while all distances quoted by the _ key project , including those of table [ tbl : distances ] , assume r@xmath158 . in the analysis which follows , whenever the suntzeff ( 1999 ) hubble relations ( , equations [ eq : hamuy_b]-[eq : red ] ) are employed ( sections [ hamuy ] , [ metallicity ] , and [ flow ] ) , we adjust the true moduli ( and associated cepheid reddenings ) of table [ tbl : distances ] , to ensure consistency with suntzeff et al.s use of r@xmath157 . we stress that the effect upon h@xmath1 is @xmath1591% , and entirely accounted for in our error budget ( entry r2 of table [ tbl : error ] ) . second , suntzeff correctly adopt @xmath150 for ngc 3368 , and not the published @xmath160 ( tanvir 1995 ) ; the additional 0.05mag corresponds to the `` long - versus short '' effect , not included by tanvir et al . third , suntzeff use ( slightly ) modified absolute moduli for ic 4182 and ngc 5253 , from those published by saha ( 1994 ) and saha ( 1995 ) , respectively . while the published values were @xmath119 ( ic 4182 ) and @xmath79 ( ngc 5253 ) , suntzeff used @xmath161 ( ic 4182 ) and @xmath152 ( ngc 5253 ) . in the case of ngc 5253 , a long - versus - short correction of 0.05mag was applied to an apparent @xmath7-band modulus of @xmath162 , followed by the subtraction of a total line - of - sight extinction of a@xmath163mag , resulting in a @xmath70 which is 0.16mag nearer than that favored by saha ( 1995 ) . this differs ( mildly ) from the saha ( 1995 ) published @xmath7-band modulus of @xmath164 . since there is no extant evidence for a long - versus - short effect in the older wf / pc data ( , for our purposes , ic 4182 and ngc 5253 ) , such a correction is not necessary . _ our re - analysis of the saha and tanvir galaxies allows us to circumvent some of the problems encountered by suntzeff ( in particular , the assumptions that had to be made in order to derive a suitable @xmath70 for ic 4182 and ngc 5253 ) . applying the self - consistent distances listed in column 2 of table [ tbl : distances ] , in lieu of those at the disposal of suntzeff et al . , along with the sne photometry of table [ tbl : supernovae ] , to the hubble relations of equations [ eq : hamuy_b]-[eq : hamuy_i ] , leads to the set of sn- and color - dependent hubble constants shown in table [ tbl : hamuy ] . a sample error budget for sn 1981b in ngc 4536 , is provided in table [ tbl : error ] , similar to that of table 4 of hamuy ( 1996 ) . using the full sample of eight calibrators in table [ tbl : hamuy ] leads to a weighted , color - independent , hubble constant of h@xmath165 . because of the previously documented shortcomings of sn 1960f and 1974 g , we favor a hubble constant tied to the remaining six calibrators ( , the five employed by suntzeff 1999 , supplemented by sn 1989b in ngc 3627 ) , although we should stress that numerically the results are identical . therefore , our favored result is @xmath166 comparing equation [ eq : ho_bkg ] with the suntzeff ( 1999 ) result of h@xmath155 demonstrates that our new allframe@xmath21trial - based distances result in a 6.1% increase in the predicted hubble constant . in contrast with the suntzeff ( 1999 ) methodology of section [ hamuy ] , saha ( 1997 ) , sandage ( 1996 ) do not apply a peak luminosity - decline rate correction aimed at reducing the scatter of the type ia sne hubble diagram . their adopted fits , which are based upon a combination of the and asiago ( patat 1995 ) surveys , are @xmath167 and are the direct analog of equations [ eq : hamuy_b ] and [ eq : hamuy_v ] . if we now take the peak absolute magnitudes for the six calibrators used in section [ hamuy ] , from table 6 of saha et al . , we find the weighted means to be m@xmath168 and m@xmath169 . while saha ( 1997 ) use sn 1895b in their h@xmath1 analysis , we have not , due to the larger errors in its photographic photometry . the good agreement between these mean magnitudes and the ones we derived in section [ hamuy ] ( see the final two entries of table [ tbl : supernovae ] ) , despite the @xmath0mag systematic offset in the absolute distances ( recall table [ tbl : distances ] ) is largely a fortuitous one . it comes about due to the fact that saha ( 1997 ) assume the observed sne peak magnitudes reflect the unextinguished values ( except in the cases of sn 1981b and sn 1989b ) , whereas suntzeff ( 1999 ) solve for both the intrinsic and galactic foreground reddening . coupled with equations [ eq : saha_b ] and [ eq : saha_v ] , these lead to h@xmath170 kms@xmath156mpc@xmath156 and h@xmath171 kms@xmath156mpc@xmath156 , respectively . the weighted mean of these @xmath3- and @xmath7-band hubble constants is h@xmath172 . saha ( 1997 ) use slightly different distances to the majority of their calibrators , in comparison with those published in their individual galaxy papers ; adopting these published distances to the galaxies in question leads to h@xmath173 , a 1.2% increase over that above . in comparison , adopting our best estimate of the distances to the six sandage / saha calibrators , based upon their original published dophot photometry ( column 3 of table [ tbl : distances ] ) , would yield h@xmath174 ( entry 7 of table [ tbl : h0_bkg ] ) . if we were to now replicate the analysis of saha ( 1997 ) , again using their sne photometry and reddening parameters ( table 6 of saha et al . ) , but now adopting the new allframe@xmath21trial distance moduli of table [ tbl : distances ] ( column 2 ) , the predicted mean peak magnitudes would be m@xmath175m@xmath176 , the mean @xmath3- and @xmath7-band peak magnitudes both decrease by @xmath90.21 mag . in conjunction with equations [ eq : saha_b ] and [ eq : saha_v ] , these revised mean magnitudes lead to hubble constants of h@xmath177=@xmath178 and h@xmath179=@xmath180 . the weighted mean of these values is h@xmath181 ( entry 5 of table [ tbl : h0_bkg ] ) . this value is directly comparable to the h@xmath182 alluded to earlier , in that the adopted hubble diagram ( equations [ eq : saha_b ] and [ eq : saha_v ] ) and sn lightcurve photometry ( table 6 of saha 1997 ) were chosen to be identical the only difference here is the adopted absolute distances to the host galaxies in question . the adoption of the new distance moduli leads to an upward revision of the saha et al . ( 1997 ) h@xmath1 of 8.9% . saha ( 1997 ) have noted that when correcting for the decline rate adopted by suntzeff ( 1999 ) , the calibrators become @xmath90.1 mag more luminous than the distant sample . suntzeff ( 1999 , and earlier papers ) suggest that such an anomaly may be real , reflecting the morphological type ( and stellar population ) mismatch between nearby and distant host galaxies . on balance , as summarized earlier , the case for a decline rate correction seems strong and hence our adoption of such an approach . saha use a different type ia sne sample for deriving their hubble diagram . their derived decline rate - peak luminosity relationships ( in both @xmath3 and @xmath7 ) are @xmath910% shallower than those derived by suntzeff ( 1999 ) and phillips ( 1999 ) . using these saha fits ( their equations 23 and 24 , with the associated zero points ) with the new allframe@xmath21trial distances to the same six calibrators employed above , leads to h@xmath1=@xmath183 , which is 4.5% greater than the value derived in the absence of any m@xmath184 correction ( , entries 5 and 6 of table [ tbl : h0_bkg ] ) . in comparison , the steeper slope favored by suntzeff ( 1999 ) results in an 8.3% increase in h@xmath1 ( , entries 1 and 5 of table [ tbl : h0_bkg ] ) . the results of sections [ hamuy ] and [ sandage ] were assuming no metallicity dependence of the cepheid pl relation . the dependence of the cepheid pl relation on metallicity has not yet been well established ( , musella 1999 ; storm , carney & fry 1999 ; nevalainen & roos 1998 ; saio & gautschy 1998 ; webb 1998 ; kennicutt 1998 ; sasselov 1997 ; gould 1994 ; madore & freedman 1990 ) , with perhaps the best empirical determination of the magnitude of such an effect to date being that due to kennicutt ( 1998 ) . kennicutt performed a differential analysis of the pl relations in two fields of m101 , spanning a range of @xmath185dex in oxygen abundance , and found @xmath186=-0.24\pm 0.16$]magdex@xmath156 . in other words , for any galaxy whose metallicity exceeds that of the reference galaxy - , the lmc , with @xmath187 by an order of magnitude , simply determining the absolute distance modulus via offsetting the apparent pl relations from those of the lmc , could lead to @xmath70 being underestimated by 0.24mag . for each of the six high- and intermediate - quality calibrating sne of table [ tbl : galaxies ] kennicutt ( 1999 ) have now shown that , in the mean , the metallicity of the cepheid fields , as measured by abundances , is 0.31dex greater than that of the lmc . recalling the kennicutt ( 1998 ) result of @xmath186=-0.24\pm 0.16$]magdex@xmath156 , this @xmath210.31dex metallicity offset from the lmc implies a typical correction factor of @xmath1880.07mag needs to be applied to the ensemble of calibrators . using the abundances from table [ tbl : galaxies ] , we applied the appropriate kennicutt ( 1998 ) correction to each of the individual calibrators , and then followed the identical decline rate - peak luminosity analysis described in section [ hamuy ] . this leads to a predicted hubble constant of h@xmath189 . in other words , applying a correction to the absolute distance moduli , based on kennicutt ( 1998 ) relationship , results in a reduction in our adopted h@xmath1 of 4.4% ( entries 1 and 3 of table [ tbl : h0_bkg ] ) . these two results agree to within @xmath91@xmath24 . the type ia supernova sample is sufficiently distant that use of the cosmic microwave background ( cmb ) reference frame is the standard to which the observed type ia sne host galaxy heliocentric velocities are transformed . here we test the assumption that correcting velocities for the local flow field does not introduce any significant systematic offset in the derived h@xmath1 . the cmb frame should , of course , be appropriate , as all but 5 of the 29 sne have recessional velocities in excess of 6000kms@xmath156 ( , a regime where peculiar velocities are @xmath190% the recessional velocity ) ; for the nearby sne , though , the peculiar velocities can be significant , so an effort has been made to estimate them . to that end , we have employed the three - attractor ( virgo@xmath21great attractor@xmath21shapley ) model described by mould ( 1999b ) , in order to correct the observed heliocentric velocities for the resultant flow field solution . we assume local group infall velocities of 200kms@xmath156 , 400kms@xmath156 , and 85kms@xmath156 , for virgo , the great attractor , and shapley , respectively . within this framework , the adopted infall velocities reproduce the amplitude of the cmb dipole ( @xmath9630kms@xmath156 ) , but with only these three attractors , the direction of local group motion is @xmath920@xmath191 away from the cmb direction . as we are simply interested in assessing the magnitude of the effect , at this stage , fine - tuning the model to improve this vector offset was deemed unnecessary . starting from 29 sne ( hamuy 1996 ; table 1 ) , we adopted the hamuy ( 1996 ) color cut to eliminate the three reddest sne ( sn 1990y , 1992k , and 1993h ) , and also eliminated the three which are either missing ( sn 1990 t and 1991s ) from zcat ( huchra 1999 ) , or have zcat velocities which are discrepant with those tabulated by hamuy et al ( sn 1993ag ) . to this final sample of 23 type ia sne , we performed a weighted least squares fit of the form @xmath192 + c_2 \label{eq : fit}\ ] ] including errors in m@xmath193 and @xmath154 , but neglecting those in recessional velocity @xmath194 . restricting ourselves to the peak @xmath7-band magnitude @xmath195 and the cmb reference frame ( , @xmath196 in equation [ eq : fit ] ) , for the adopted sample of 23 sne , we find @xmath197 and @xmath198 , with a dispersion @xmath199 . following the error analysis outlined in table [ tbl : error ] , and using the same six calibrators employed in section [ hamuy ] , this yields a @xmath7-band hubble constant of @xmath200 . conversely , if we now take the output of our three - attractor flow field model and replace @xmath201 , with the derived flow field velocities @xmath202 , the coefficients for equation [ eq : fit ] become @xmath203 and @xmath204 , with a dispersion @xmath205 . the resultant @xmath7-band hubble constant is then @xmath206 . comparison of the above results demonstrates that h@xmath179 increases by only 2.1% in going from the cmb to flow field reference frame . the same conclusion holds for h@xmath177 and h@xmath207 , not surprisingly . it is re - assuring to confirm that the two reference frames lead to hubble constants which are consistent at the @xmath138 level , as we had assumed , _ a priori . _ under the assumption that the fornax distance was defined by the silbermann ( 1999 ) cepheid distance to ngc 1365 - , @xmath208 - the suggestion had been made ( , figure 4 of suntzeff 1999 ) that the ( two ) fornax cluster type ia sne appeared to lie @xmath90.35mag behind ngc 1365 ( a discrepancy , albeit only at the @xmath91.5@xmath24 level ) . indeed , the same apparent discrepancy with this earlier cepheid distance had been noticed in surface brightness fluctuation ( sbf , ferrarese 1999 ) and fundamental plane ( fp , kelson 1999 ) fornax studies . with the addition of new cepheid distances to ngc 1326a ( prosser 1999 ) and 1425 ( mould 1999a ) , though , the _ key project s favored fornax distance is now @xmath209 ( ferrarese 1999 ) , reducing the cepheid - sne distance discrepancy from the earlier @xmath91.5@xmath24 , to @xmath611@xmath24 . further , direct , fornax distance determinations , including sandage / saha s upcoming attempt at uncovering cepheids in ngc 1316 , will be an important aid in determining whether the earlier cepheid versus sbf / fp distance `` dichotomy '' has truly been resolved . regardless , as far as a type ia sne - based determination of h@xmath1 is concerned , the inclusion of these two additional fornax sne has little effect upon the derived result , save for the expected reduction in the final random uncertainty ( madore 1999 ) . _ table [ tbl : h0_bkg ] summarizes the results of sections [ hamuy]-[flow ] , illustrating the dependence of the derived hubble constant to the important constituents of the analysis , including the adopted peak luminosity - light curve shape correction , number of local calibrators , cepheid pl - metallicity , and reference frame . it is important to stress that all of the scenarios based upon our uniform allframe@xmath21trial analysis ( all but the final entry of table [ tbl : h0_bkg ] ) are consistent , at the @xmath210 level , with our final , adopted , result of h@xmath211 ( , the initial entry of table [ tbl : h0_bkg ] ) . it is reassuring that this result is so robust , considering , for example , the different approaches adopted in the treatment ( or lack thereof ) of the sne light curve shapes ( contrast the first and fifth entries of table [ tbl : h0_bkg ] ) . we have re - derived distances to seven type ia sne - host galaxies , using archival _ hst data , collected by two different , non-_key project programs . the methodology employed parallels that used in reducing and analyzing the 18 galaxies observed as part of the _ hst key project on the extragalactic distance scale . this re - analysis has also benefited from the inclusion of additional archival data not available at the time of original reduction , as well as the experience and knowledge gained over the past five years in calibrating wf / pc and wfpc2 data . likewise , such cross - checking has uncovered several minor discrepancies in some of the earlier published results . _ _ _ the major result of our re - analysis is that , in the mean , the absolute distance modulus for these seven local type ia sne calibrators is @xmath0mag nearer ( weighted ) , on average , than those published originally by tanvir ( 1995 ) and saha ( 1994,1995,1996ab,1997,1999 ) . there are several reasons for the systematic differences , including differences in the photometry , cepheid samples , weighting of the data , and treatment of reddening . using these new distances , we have re - calculated the relevant zero points to the hubble diagrams used by suntzeff ( 1999 ) and saha ( 1997 ) , in order to quantify their effect upon the predicted value of the hubble constant . properly weighting each galaxy and sn by its associated uncertainties shows that any previous empirical calibration tied to these local type ia sne calibrators will have underestimated h@xmath1 by @xmath212% . formally , our favored , based upon type ia sne , is h@xmath213 . this result assumes the decline rate - peak luminosity relationship of suntzeff ( 1999 ) and no metallicity dependence of the underlying cepheid pl relationship . if the kennicutt ( 1998 ) empirical metallicity dependence is assumed , the predicted h@xmath1 is reduced to h@xmath214 . our type ia sne - based h@xmath1 determination agrees , to within the uncertainties , with the ( sakai 1999 ) and surface brightness fluctuation ( ferrarese 1999 ) results . the work presented in this paper is based on observations with the nasa / esa hubble space telescope , obtained by the space telescope science institute , which is operated by aura , inc . under nasa contract 5 - 26555 . the continued assistance of the nasa and stsci support staff , and in particular our program coordinator , doug van orsow , is gratefully acknowledged . support for this work was provided by nasa through grant go-2227 - 87a from stsci . smgh and pbs are grateful to nato for travel support via a collaborative research grant ( 960178 ) . we wish to thank nick suntzeff and brian schmidt for their input , and say a special word of thanks to the referee , mark phillips , for a most thorough and helpful analysis of the paper . tables [ tbl : n4639_ceph ] to [ tbl : n4496a_ceph ] include basic positional information , along with the cepheid mean magnitudes and periods , derived as part of our allframe@xmath21trial re - analysis of the type ia sne - host galaxy _ hst archive data . stetson s ( 1998 ) photometric calibration was employed , although transformation to the hill ( 1998 ) scale can be accomplished ( in the mean ) by adding @xmath210.02mag and @xmath210.04mag , respectively , to the cepheid mean @xmath7- and @xmath14-band magnitudes . epoch - by - epoch photometry , light curves , and finding charts , for all the cepheids contained herein , are available through the _ hst key project s web page http://www.ipac.caltech.edu/h0kp/.__ lcll ngc 3982 & n / a & sn 1998aq & 8100 ngc 4639 & [email protected] & sn 1990n & 5981 ngc 4536 & [email protected] & sn 1981b & 5427 ngc 3627 & [email protected] & sn 1989b & 6549 ngc 3368 & [email protected] & sn 1998bu & 5415 ngc 4527 & n / a & sn 1991 t & 7504 ngc 5253 & [email protected] & sn 1972e & 4277 ngc 1316 & n / a & sn 1980n & 7504,8100 ngc 1316 & n / a & sn 1981d & 7504,8100 ic 4182 & [email protected] & sn 1937c & 2547 ngc 4496a & [email protected] & sn 1960f & 5427 ngc 4414 & [email protected] & sn 1974 g & 5397 ngc 5253 & [email protected] & sn 1895b & 4277 lrrrrll 68@xmath1262@xmath1265 & 1@xmath215 & 34@xmath216 & 0@xmath217 & 6@xmath218 & [email protected] & this work 64@xmath1265@xmath1265 & 0@xmath215 & 40@xmath216 & 2@xmath217 & 4@xmath218 & @xmath219 ? & jha ( 1999 ) 60@xmath1262 & 0@xmath215 & 40@xmath216 & 13@xmath217 & 8@xmath218 & [email protected] & saha ( 1999 ) 63@xmath1262@xmath1264 & 1@xmath215 & 39@xmath216 & 0@xmath217 & 6@xmath218 & [email protected] & phillips ( 1999 ) 64@xmath1262@xmath1264 & 1@xmath215 & 34@xmath216 & 0@xmath217 & 5@xmath218 & [email protected] & suntzeff ( 1999 ) 65@xmath1261@xmath1266 & 11@xmath215 & 25@xmath216 & 1@xmath217 & 3@xmath218 & [email protected] & riess ( 1998 ) 60@xmath1266 & 1@xmath215 & 28@xmath216 & 0@xmath217 & 7@xmath218 & [email protected] & tripp ( 1998 ) 50@xmath1263@xmath1265 & 0@xmath215 & 20@xmath216 & 37@xmath217 & 4@xmath218 & [email protected] & lanoix ( 1998 ) 58@xmath1263@xmath1268 & 0@xmath215 & 40@xmath216 & 15@xmath217 & 7@xmath218 & [email protected] & saha ( 1997 ) 60@xmath1265 & 7@xmath215 & 25@xmath216 & 0@xmath217 & 7@xmath218 & [email protected] & tripp ( 1997 ) 63@xmath1263@xmath1263 & 1@xmath215 & 28@xmath216 & 0@xmath217 & 4@xmath218 & [email protected] & hamuy ( 1996 ) 64@xmath1263@xmath1263 & 1@xmath215 & 16@xmath216 & 3@xmath217 & 3@xmath218 & [email protected] & riess ( 1996 ) 66@xmath12612 & ? @xmath215 & ? @xmath216 & ? @xmath217 & -@xmath218 & @xmath219 ? & iwamoto & nomoto ( 1998 ) 68@xmath1266@xmath1267 & 0@xmath215 & 0@xmath216 & 6@xmath217 & -@xmath218 & [email protected] & ruiz - lapuente ( 1996 ) 67@xmath1269 & 1@xmath215 & 9@xmath216 & 16@xmath217 & -@xmath218 & [email protected] & hflich & khokhlov ( 1996 ) rcccc 7@xmath220 & @xmath600.015 & 0.030 & @xmath600.064 & 0.060 16@xmath220 & @xmath600.113 & 0.018 & @xmath600.006 & 0.034 18@xmath220 & @xmath600.011 & 0.036 & @xmath210.062 & 0.032 7@xmath220 & @xmath600.076 & 0.054 & @xmath600.122 & 0.036 5@xmath220 & @xmath210.028 & 0.093 & @xmath210.022 & 0.147 27@xmath220 & @xmath600.038 & 0.021 & @xmath600.119 & 0.039 45@xmath220 & @xmath600.039 & 0.014 & @xmath600.033 & 0.028 lllll ngc 4639 & @xmath221 & @xmath222 & @xmath223 & @xmath223 ngc 4536 & @xmath224 & @xmath225 & @xmath226 & @xmath227 ngc 3627 & @xmath228 & @xmath229 & @xmath230 & @xmath231 ngc 3368 & @xmath232 & @xmath233 & @xmath234 & n / a ngc 5253 & @xmath235 & @xmath236 & @xmath237 & @xmath238 ic 4182 & @xmath239 & @xmath240 & @xmath241 & @xmath242 ngc 4496a & @xmath243 & @xmath244 & @xmath245 & @xmath128 ngc 4414 & @xmath246 & n / a & @xmath247 & n / a llccccccc 1990n & ngc 4639 & @xmath248 & @xmath249 & @xmath250 & @xmath251 & @xmath252 & @xmath253 & @xmath254 1981b & ngc 4536 & @xmath255 & @xmath256 & n / a & @xmath257 & @xmath258 & @xmath259 & n / a 1989b & ngc 3627 & @xmath260 & @xmath261 & n / a & @xmath262 & @xmath263 & @xmath264 & n / a 1998bu & ngc 3368 & @xmath265 & @xmath266 & @xmath267 & @xmath268 & @xmath269 & @xmath270 & @xmath271 1972e & ngc 5253 & @xmath272 & @xmath273 & @xmath274 & @xmath275 & @xmath276 & @xmath277 & @xmath278 1937c & ic 4182 & @xmath279 & @xmath280 & n / a & @xmath275 & @xmath281 & @xmath282 & n / a 1960f & ngc 4496a & @xmath283 & @xmath284 & n / a & @xmath285 & @xmath286 & @xmath287 & n / a 1974 g & ngc 4414 & @xmath288 & @xmath289 & n / a & @xmath290 & @xmath291 & @xmath292 & n / a & & & @xmath293 & @xmath293 & @xmath294 & & & @xmath295 & @xmath296 & @xmath294 lllll 1990n & ngc 4639 & @xmath297 & @xmath298 & @xmath299 1981b & ngc 4536 & @xmath300 & @xmath301 & @xmath302 n / a 1989b & ngc 3627 & @xmath303 & @xmath304 & @xmath302 n / a 1998bu & ngc 3368 & @xmath305 & @xmath306 & @xmath307 1972e & ngc 5253 & @xmath308 & @xmath309 & @xmath310 1937c & ic 4182 & @xmath311 & @xmath312 & @xmath302 n / a 1960f & ngc 4496a & @xmath313 & @xmath314 & @xmath302 n / a 1974 g & ngc 4414 & @xmath315 & @xmath316 & @xmath302 n / a & @xmath317 & @xmath318 & @xmath319 & @xmath320 & @xmath321 & @xmath319 rll & * errors on the cepheid distance scale * & a & lmc true modulus & @xmath322 b & lmc pl zero point & @xmath323 s1 & lmc pl systematic uncertainty ( = a+b ) & @xmath322 c & hst @xmath7-band zero point & @xmath324 d & hst @xmath14-band zero point & @xmath324 s2 & photometry systematic uncertainty ( @xmath325 ) & @xmath326 r1 & photometry random uncertainty ( allframe vs dophot ) & @xmath327 r2 & extinction treatment ( uncertainty in r@xmath328 ) & @xmath323 r3 & dereddened pl fit & @xmath329 r@xmath330 & total random ( = r1+r2+r3 ) & @xmath331 s@xmath330 & total systematic ( = s1+s2 ) & @xmath332 * ii . * & * errors on the sn distance scale * & e & apparent @xmath7 magnitude & @xmath324 f & sn line - of - sight reddening ( @xmath333 ) & @xmath334 g & distance modulus ( = r@xmath330 ) & @xmath331 h & absolute @xmath7 magnitude ( = e+f+g ) & @xmath335 i & m@xmath336 vs @xmath337 slope ( @xmath338 $ ] ) & @xmath339 j & m@xmath336 vs @xmath340 curvature ( @xmath341 ^ 2 $ ] ) & @xmath342 k & @xmath340 ( @xmath343 ^ 2 $ ] ) & @xmath324 l & corrected absolute @xmath7 magnitude ( = h+i+j+k ) & @xmath344 m & hubble diagram zero point & @xmath329n & hubble diagram scatter & @xmath332 & total random ( = l+m+n ) & @xmath345 & & = 6.1 & total systematic ( = s@xmath330 ) & @xmath332 & & = 4.9 lcccccc @xmath346 & s99 & 6 & s99 & g99 & none & cmb @xmath347 & s99 & 8 & s99 & g99 & none & cmb @xmath348 & s99 & 6 & s99 & g99 & k98 & cmb @xmath349 & s99 & 6 & s99 & g99 & none & ff @xmath350 & none & 6 & s97 & g99 & none & cmb @xmath351 & s97 & 6 & s97 & g99 & none & cmb @xmath352 & none & 6 & s97 & s / t & none & cmb ccrrccc c01 & 1 & 597.4 & 647.0 & @xmath353 & @xmath354 & @xmath355c02 & 2 & 455.5 & 295.0 & @xmath356 & @xmath357 & @xmath358c03 & 2 & 472.2 & 324.0 & @xmath359 & @xmath360 & @xmath361c04 & 2 & 226.9 & 620.2 & @xmath362 & @xmath363 & @xmath364c05 & 2 & 329.0 & 321.1 & @xmath365 & @xmath366 & @xmath367c06 & 2 & 155.1 & 529.9 & @xmath368 & @xmath369 & @xmath370c07 & 2 & 437.8 & 167.9 & @xmath371 & @xmath372 & @xmath373c08 & 2 & 92.3 & 381.8 & @xmath374 & @xmath375 & @xmath376c09 & 3 & 518.2 & 548.0 & @xmath377 & @xmath378 & @xmath379c10 & 3 & 361.2 & 557.0 & @xmath380 & @xmath381 & @xmath382c11 & 3 & 551.4 & 575.6 & @xmath383 & @xmath384 & @xmath385c12 & 3 & 780.0 & 584.8 & @xmath386 & @xmath387 & @xmath388c13 & 3 & 488.6 & 590.1 & @xmath389 & @xmath390 & @xmath391c14 & 3 & 528.9 & 574.7 & @xmath392 & @xmath393 & @xmath394c15 & 3 & 256.0 & 614.9 & @xmath395 & @xmath396 & @xmath397c16 & 4 & 554.7 & 83.8 & @xmath398 & @xmath399 & @xmath400c17 & 4 & 559.5 & 76.6 & @xmath401 & @xmath402 & @xmath403 ccrrccc c01 & 1 & 210.3 & 155.6 & @xmath404 & @xmath363 & @xmath405c02 & 1 & 228.6 & 291.5 & @xmath406 & @xmath407 & @xmath408c03 & 1 & 106.4 & 375.6 & @xmath409 & @xmath410 & @xmath411c04 & 1 & 252.4 & 651.5 & @xmath412 & @xmath413 & @xmath414c05 & 1 & 82.4 & 661.7 & @xmath415 & @xmath416 & @xmath417c06 & 1 & 375.9 & 471.8 & @xmath418 & @xmath419 & @xmath420c07 & 1 & 713.2 & 639.1 & @xmath421 & @xmath422 & @xmath423c08 & 2 & 89.4 & 202.4 & @xmath353 & @xmath424 & @xmath425c09 & 2 & 686.7 & 157.7 & @xmath426 & @xmath427 & @xmath428c10 & 2 & 423.7 & 186.6 & @xmath429 & @xmath430 & @xmath431c11 & 2 & 291.8 & 255.8 & @xmath432 & @xmath433 & @xmath434c12 & 2 & 593.7 & 328.2 & @xmath435 & @xmath436 & @xmath437c13 & 2 & 399.3 & 405.5 & @xmath438 & @xmath439 & @xmath440c14 & 2 & 342.9 & 454.0 & @xmath441 & @xmath442 & @xmath443c15 & 2 & 402.4 & 474.4 & @xmath444 & @xmath445 & @xmath446c16 & 2 & 144.7 & 523.5 & @xmath447 & @xmath448 & @xmath449c17 & 2 & 284.3 & 572.6 & @xmath450 & @xmath451 & @xmath452c18 & 2 & 73.6 & 86.4 & @xmath453 & @xmath454 & @xmath455c19 & 2 & 726.0 & 133.8 & @xmath456 & @xmath457 & @xmath458c20 & 2 & 535.2 & 340.3 & @xmath459 & @xmath460 & @xmath461c21 & 2 & 195.5 & 164.9 & @xmath462 & @xmath463 & @xmath464c22 & 2 & 373.4 & 127.8 & @xmath465 & @xmath466 & @xmath467c23 & 2 & 372.6 & 344.9 & @xmath468 & @xmath466 & @xmath469c24 & 3 & 196.2 & 252.6 & @xmath470 & @xmath471 & @xmath472c25 & 3 & 91.9 & 489.5 & @xmath473 & @xmath474 & @xmath475c26 & 3 & 483.4 & 543.1 & @xmath476 & @xmath477 & @xmath478c27 & 3 & 311.5 & 574.3 & @xmath479 & @xmath480 & @xmath481c28 & 3 & 621.3 & 646.8 & @xmath482 & @xmath483 & @xmath484c29 & 3 & 222.7 & 677.0 & @xmath485 & @xmath486 & @xmath487c30 & 3 & 359.8 & 703.0 & @xmath488 & @xmath489 & @xmath490c31 & 3 & 266.8 & 474.4 & @xmath491 & @xmath492 & @xmath493c32 & 3 & 279.0 & 216.0 & @xmath494 & @xmath495 & @xmath496c33 & 4 & 660.9 & 137.5 & @xmath497 & @xmath498 & @xmath499c34 & 4 & 536.6 & 574.9 & @xmath500 & @xmath372 & @xmath501c35 & 4 & 268.5 & 766.8 & @xmath502 & @xmath503 & @xmath504c36 & 4 & 500.8 & 392.0 & @xmath505 & @xmath506 & @xmath507c37 & 4 & 781.0 & 440.9 & @xmath508 & @xmath509 & @xmath510c38 & 4 & 393.0 & 352.2 & @xmath511 & @xmath512 & @xmath513c39 & 4 & 422.2 & 98.5 & @xmath514 & @xmath515 & @xmath516 ccrrccc c01 & 1 & 304.0 & 343.0 & @xmath517 & @xmath518 & @xmath519c02 & 1 & 254.7 & 641.0 & @xmath520 & @xmath521 & @xmath522c03 & 2 & 145.4 & 171.0 & @xmath523 & @xmath524 & @xmath525c04 & 2 & 124.1 & 199.4 & @xmath526 & @xmath527 & @xmath528c05 & 2 & 389.8 & 199.8 & @xmath529 & @xmath530 & @xmath531c06 & 2 & 308.4 & 227.3 & @xmath532 & @xmath533 & @xmath534c07 & 2 & 416.6 & 267.6 & @xmath535 & @xmath492 & @xmath536c08 & 2 & 517.9 & 282.3 & @xmath537 & @xmath538 & @xmath539c09 & 2 & 287.4 & 307.4 & @xmath540 & @xmath541 & @xmath542c10 & 2 & 170.9 & 308.7 & @xmath543 & @xmath544 & @xmath545c11 & 2 & 516.4 & 343.5 & @xmath546 & @xmath547 & @xmath548c12 & 2 & 549.2 & 245.8 & @xmath549 & @xmath550 & @xmath551c13 & 2 & 183.6 & 347.3 & @xmath552 & @xmath553 & @xmath554c14 & 2 & 89.8 & 388.5 & @xmath555 & @xmath556 & @xmath557c15 & 2 & 751.4 & 465.2 & @xmath558 & @xmath559 & @xmath560c16 & 2 & 642.4 & 762.0 & @xmath561 & @xmath562 & @xmath563c17 & 2 & 469.8 & 291.2 & @xmath564 & @xmath565 & @xmath566c18 & 2 & 484.5 & 349.4 & @xmath567 & @xmath568 & @xmath569c19 & 2 & 307.5 & 392.3 & @xmath570 & @xmath571 & @xmath572c20 & 2 & 742.8 & 289.0 & @xmath564 & @xmath573 & @xmath574c21 & 2 & 648.2 & 311.4 & @xmath374 & @xmath575 & @xmath576c22 & 2 & 353.3 & 776.1 & @xmath577 & @xmath578 & @xmath579c23 & 2 & 582.0 & 261.3 & @xmath561 & @xmath580 & @xmath581c24 & 3 & 350.0 & 120.1 & @xmath582 & @xmath583 & @xmath584c25 & 3 & 255.2 & 209.7 & @xmath585 & @xmath586 & @xmath587c26 & 3 & 749.1 & 275.6 & @xmath588 & @xmath589 & @xmath590c27 & 3 & 328.6 & 281.2 & @xmath591 & @xmath592 & @xmath593c28 & 3 & 187.3 & 329.4 & @xmath594 & @xmath595 & @xmath596c29 & 3 & 243.2 & 394.0 & @xmath594 & @xmath597 & @xmath598c30 & 3 & 416.0 & 652.3 & @xmath599 & @xmath600 & @xmath601c31 & 3 & 520.5 & 662.1 & @xmath602 & @xmath603 & @xmath604c32 & 3 & 418.0 & 235.3 & @xmath605 & @xmath606 & @xmath607c33 & 4 & 601.9 & 163.1 & @xmath608 & @xmath609 & @xmath610c34 & 4 & 585.6 & 185.5 & @xmath611 & @xmath612 & @xmath613c35 & 4 & 535.6 & 471.7 & @xmath614 & @xmath615 & @xmath616c36 & 4 & 135.7 & 125.4 & @xmath617 & @xmath618 & @xmath619 crrccc c01 & 723.8 & 575.5 & @xmath620 & @xmath621 & @xmath622 c02 & 702.1 & 316.5 & @xmath623 & @xmath624 & @xmath625 c03 & -689.0 & 266.5 & @xmath626 & @xmath627 & @xmath628 c04 & 628.9 & 527.4 & @xmath629 & @xmath630 & @xmath631 c05 & -328.9 & -470.8 & @xmath632 & @xmath633 & @xmath634 c06 & -536.7 & 392.0 & @xmath635 & @xmath636 & @xmath637 c07 & 764.6 & 380.5 & @xmath638 & @xmath639 & @xmath640 c08 & -113.3 & -334.4 & @xmath641 & @xmath642 & @xmath643 c09 & -94.8 & 656.5 & @xmath644 & @xmath645 & @xmath646 c10 & -446.5 & 252.3 & @xmath647 & @xmath648 & @xmath649 c11 & -42.4 & 690.9 & @xmath650 & @xmath651 & @xmath652 crrccr c01 & 336.1 & 118.8 & @xmath653 & @xmath654 & @xmath655 c02 & 535.7 & 163.1 & @xmath656 & @xmath657 & @xmath658 c03 & 738.8 & 386.8 & @xmath659 & @xmath660 & @xmath661 c04 & 299.3 & 529.2 & @xmath662 & @xmath663 & @xmath664 c05 & 1124.0 & 549.7 & @xmath665 & @xmath666 & @xmath667 c06 & 393.8 & -562.0 & @xmath668 & @xmath669 & @xmath670 c07 & 964.1 & 433.6 & @xmath671 & @xmath672 & @xmath673 crrccr c01 & -200.5 & 151.8 & @xmath674 & @xmath675 & @xmath676 c02 & -479.8 & 188.3 & @xmath677 & @xmath678 & @xmath679 c03 & -503.5 & 305.1 & @xmath680 & @xmath681 & @xmath682 c04 & 96.2 & 643.0 & @xmath683 & @xmath684 & @xmath685 c05 & -481.3 & 338.5 & @xmath686 & @xmath687 & @xmath688 c06 & -216.8 & 291.4 & @xmath689 & @xmath690 & @xmath691 c07 & -372.7 & 29.9 & @xmath692 & @xmath693 & @xmath694 c08 & -331.9 & 60.4 & @xmath695 & @xmath696 & @xmath697 c09 & -259.2 & -141.8 & @xmath698 & @xmath699 & @xmath700 c10 & -257.8 & 33.3 & @xmath701 & @xmath702 & @xmath703 c11 & -653.5 & -56.8 & @xmath695 & @xmath704 & @xmath705 c12 & -521.5 & -150.1 & @xmath706 & @xmath707 & @xmath708 c13 & -455.6 & 63.2 & @xmath709 & @xmath710 & @xmath711 c14 & -526.5 & -460.8 & @xmath712 & @xmath713 & @xmath714 c15 & -240.0 & -145.1 & @xmath715 & @xmath716 & @xmath717 c16 & -326.3 & -570.0 & @xmath718 & @xmath719 & @xmath720 c17 & -645.1 & -449.4 & @xmath526 & @xmath721 & @xmath722 c18 & -96.6 & -59.9 & @xmath723 & @xmath724 & @xmath725 c19 & -79.3 & -550.7 & @xmath726 & @xmath727 & @xmath728 c20 & 115.3 & 7.1 & @xmath729 & @xmath730 & @xmath731 c21 & 156.6 & 101.4 & @xmath732 & @xmath733 & @xmath734 c22 & 151.5 & -160.4 & @xmath735 & @xmath736 & @xmath737 c23 & 139.1 & -175.8 & @xmath738 & @xmath739 & @xmath740 c24 & 561.9 & -235.3 & @xmath741 & @xmath742 & @xmath743 c25 & 594.5 & -129.0 & @xmath744 & @xmath745 & @xmath746 c26 & 531.8 & 262.3 & @xmath747 & @xmath748 & @xmath749 c27 & 360.3 & 191.7 & @xmath750 & @xmath751 & @xmath752 c28 & 579.0 & 174.9 & @xmath753 & @xmath754 & @xmath755 ccrrccc c01 & 1 & 289.2 & 110.5 & @xmath756 & @xmath757 & @xmath758c02 & 1 & 779.8 & 465.3 & @xmath759 & @xmath760 & @xmath761c03 & 1 & 134.7 & 696.6 & @xmath762 & @xmath763 & @xmath764c04 & 1 & 343.8 & 279.7 & @xmath765 & @xmath766 & @xmath767c05 & 1 & 266.3 & 379.2 & @xmath768 & @xmath769 & @xmath770c06 & 1 & 241.8 & 481.2 & @xmath771 & @xmath466 & @xmath772c07 & 1 & 663.2 & 524.5 & @xmath520 & @xmath773 & @xmath774c08 & 1 & 364.4 & 535.7 & @xmath775 & @xmath776 & @xmath777c09 & 1 & 680.4 & 546.0 & @xmath778 & @xmath372 & @xmath779c10 & 1 & 659.2 & 564.8 & @xmath780 & @xmath547 & @xmath781c11 & 1 & 765.4 & 318.6 & @xmath782 & @xmath783 & @xmath784c12 & 1 & 424.9 & 415.1 & @xmath785 & @xmath786 & @xmath787c13 & 1 & 693.9 & 288.7 & @xmath788 & @xmath789 & @xmath790c14 & 2 & 285.7 & 164.8 & @xmath791 & @xmath792 & @xmath793c15 & 2 & 554.7 & 178.0 & @xmath794 & @xmath795 & @xmath796c16 & 2 & 735.7 & 279.0 & @xmath797 & @xmath798 & @xmath799c17 & 2 & 286.6 & 280.3 & @xmath800 & @xmath801 & @xmath802c18 & 2 & 261.8 & 336.5 & @xmath803 & @xmath804 & @xmath805c19 & 2 & 435.6 & 356.9 & @xmath778 & @xmath806 & @xmath807c20 & 2 & 389.2 & 375.5 & @xmath808 & @xmath809 & @xmath810c21 & 2 & 514.6 & 377.4 & @xmath488 & @xmath811 & @xmath812c22 & 2 & 361.4 & 395.8 & @xmath371 & @xmath813 & @xmath814c23 & 2 & 171.1 & 426.1 & @xmath815 & @xmath558 & @xmath816c24 & 2 & 473.3 & 437.1 & @xmath497 & @xmath783 & @xmath817c25 & 2 & 102.0 & 468.0 & @xmath818 & @xmath819 & @xmath820c26 & 2 & 162.1 & 494.8 & @xmath821 & @xmath822 & @xmath823c27 & 2 & 365.1 & 497.0 & @xmath824 & @xmath825 & @xmath826c28 & 2 & 228.6 & 557.9 & @xmath827 & @xmath828 & @xmath829c29 & 2 & 521.8 & 571.5 & @xmath830 & @xmath831 & @xmath832c30 & 2 & 161.6 & 591.6 & @xmath833 & @xmath834 & @xmath835c31 & 2 & 391.7 & 676.5 & @xmath836 & @xmath837 & @xmath838c32 & 2 & 622.8 & 752.0 & @xmath839 & @xmath840 & @xmath841c33 & 2 & 422.5 & 219.6 & @xmath842 & @xmath843 & @xmath844c34 & 2 & 450.9 & 269.1 & @xmath845 & @xmath846 & @xmath847c35 & 2 & 444.9 & 297.6 & @xmath511 & @xmath848 & @xmath849c36 & 2 & 561.9 & 420.9 & @xmath850 & @xmath851 & @xmath852c37 & 2 & 511.9 & 454.3 & @xmath853 & @xmath854 & @xmath855c38 & 2 & 210.9 & 130.1 & @xmath856 & @xmath857 & @xmath858c39 & 2 & 213.3 & 96.5 & @xmath859 & @xmath860 & @xmath861c40 & 3 & 324.0 & 178.1 & @xmath862 & @xmath863 & @xmath864c41 & 3 & 196.2 & 181.9 & @xmath865 & @xmath866 & @xmath867c42 & 3 & 230.4 & 187.3 & @xmath868 & @xmath869 & @xmath870c43 & 3 & 562.4 & 190.4 & @xmath871 & @xmath872 & @xmath873c44 & 3 & 455.5 & 194.4 & @xmath874 & @xmath875 & @xmath876c45 & 3 & 257.3 & 213.7 & @xmath877 & @xmath878 & @xmath879c46 & 3 & 335.4 & 214.0 & @xmath880 & @xmath881 & @xmath882c47 & 3 & 479.3 & 228.3 & @xmath883 & @xmath884 & @xmath885c48 & 3 & 614.2 & 231.1 & @xmath567 & @xmath671 & @xmath886c49 & 3 & 381.5 & 280.7 & @xmath887 & @xmath888 & @xmath889c50 & 3 & 412.2 & 294.8 & @xmath890 & @xmath891 & @xmath892c51 & 3 & 281.8 & 301.0 & @xmath893 & @xmath894 & @xmath895c52 & 3 & 761.0 & 323.7 & @xmath896 & @xmath897 & @xmath898c53 & 3 & 233.2 & 347.9 & @xmath883 & @xmath899 & @xmath900c54 & 3 & 503.7 & 422.6 & @xmath901 & @xmath902 & @xmath903c55 & 3 & 408.4 & 492.1 & @xmath904 & @xmath905 & @xmath906c56 & 3 & 306.6 & 786.6 & @xmath907 & @xmath633 & @xmath908c57 & 3 & 402.2 & 790.9 & @xmath374 & @xmath642 & @xmath909c58 & 3 & 567.6 & 732.9 & @xmath910 & @xmath822 & @xmath911c59 & 3 & 454.1 & 238.2 & @xmath912 & @xmath913 & @xmath914c60 & 3 & 357.0 & 282.0 & @xmath915 & @xmath916 & @xmath917c61 & 3 & 292.1 & 619.2 & @xmath918 & @xmath919 & @xmath920c62 & 3 & 120.9 & 428.7 & @xmath921 & @xmath922 & @xmath923c63 & 3 & 101.1 & 438.2 & @xmath924 & @xmath925 & @xmath926c64 & 3 & 724.1 & 450.1 & @xmath927 & @xmath928 & @xmath929c65 & 3 & 110.2 & 195.1 & @xmath930 & @xmath575 & @xmath931c66 & 3 & 547.8 & 661.5 & @xmath932 & @xmath933 & @xmath934c67 & 3 & 452.3 & 242.2 & @xmath441 & @xmath360 & @xmath935c68 & 4 & 309.2 & 137.0 & @xmath797 & @xmath936 & @xmath937c69 & 4 & 196.6 & 148.0 & @xmath938 & @xmath939 & @xmath940c70 & 4 & 172.6 & 275.4 & @xmath941 & @xmath942 & @xmath943c71 & 4 & 278.9 & 351.3 & @xmath944 & @xmath945 & @xmath946c72 & 4 & 169.8 & 450.0 & @xmath947 & @xmath948 & @xmath949c73 & 4 & 710.3 & 105.4 & @xmath950 & @xmath477 & @xmath951c74 & 4 & 246.2 & 121.9 & @xmath952 & @xmath953 & @xmath954c75 & 4 & 637.2 & 150.7 & @xmath494 & @xmath955 & @xmath956c76 & 4 & 145.2 & 163.0 & @xmath901 & @xmath957 & @xmath958c77 & 4 & 337.7 & 236.1 & @xmath959 & @xmath960 & @xmath961c78 & 4 & 637.4 & 252.9 & @xmath962 & @xmath963 & @xmath964c79 & 4 & 211.9 & 334.9 & @xmath371 & @xmath965 & @xmath966c80 & 4 & 159.4 & 358.9 & @xmath485 & @xmath967 & @xmath968c81 & 4 & 300.2 & 369.1 & @xmath969 & @xmath422 & @xmath970c82 & 4 & 717.8 & 408.7 & @xmath971 & @xmath972 & @xmath973c83 & 4 & 618.4 & 413.1 & @xmath859 & @xmath974 & @xmath975c84 & 4 & 492.4 & 679.0 & @xmath406 & @xmath976 & @xmath977c85 & 4 & 360.2 & 658.5 & @xmath883 & @xmath976 & @xmath978c86 & 4 & 391.5 & 645.4 & @xmath979 & @xmath980 & @xmath981c87 & 4 & 101.9 & 644.0 & @xmath982 & @xmath983 & @xmath984c88 & 4 & 427.0 & 636.2 & @xmath836 & @xmath763 & @xmath985c89 & 4 & 401.2 & 613.1 & @xmath986 & @xmath987 & @xmath988c90 & 4 & 375.2 & 619.5 & @xmath989 & @xmath990 & @xmath991c91 & 4 & 597.0 & 462.4 & @xmath992 & @xmath463 & @xmath993c92 & 4 & 138.7 & 463.2 & @xmath429 & @xmath994 & @xmath995c93 & 4 & 138.6 & 180.7 & @xmath432 & @xmath996 & @xmath997c94 & 4 & 643.6 & 333.3 & @xmath950 & @xmath998 & @xmath999 Abstract:

Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.

Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered . Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video . Paper: the morphology of galaxies is of great interest because it reflects not only the structural properties of galaxies but also their star formation histories . a morphological study of galaxies has been one of the main topics of extra - galactic studies since the pioneering work by @xcite . despite the enormous efforts to determine the morphological types of galaxies , the morphological types of the majority of galaxies from recent surveys , such as the sloan digital sky survey ( sdss ) , still need to be determined . the morphology of bright galaxies in the local universe has been well studied and summarized in catalogs , such as a revised shaply - ames catalog of bright galaxies ( rsa , @xcite ) and the third reference catalog of bright galaxies ( rc3 , @xcite ) . however , none of these catalogs are suitable for dwarf galaxy studies because most dwarf galaxies which are much fainter than the bright end of dwarf galaxies are omitted due to their selection criteria . the recent study of @xcite , who visually classified 14,000 sdss galaxies from data release 4 ( dr4 ) , focussed on the redshift range @xmath10 , and as a consequence included few dwarf galaxies . the galaxy zoo project @xcite has provided morphological information for a much larger number of objects , but only in broad categories with little information on dwarf galaxies . dwarf galaxies , however , are predicted to be the most dominant type of galaxy based on cold dark matter ( cdm ) cosmology @xcite . the importance of dwarf galaxies in galactic astronomy has been well demonstrated by the dominance of dwarf galaxies in the local group ( lg ) , in which the number of dwarf galaxies tripled recently , mostly thanks to sdss @xcite . they also dominate the nearby satellite systems such as those hosted by m81 @xcite and m106 @xcite . galaxies with distances less than @xmath11mpc and velocities relative to the lg ( @xmath12 ) less than 600kms@xmath13 , which were compiled in the updated nearby galaxy catalog @xcite , are also dominated by dwarf galaxies . @xcite presented an all - sky catalog of nearby galaxy groups that included 10,914 galaxies in the local universe ( @xmath14 ) with various astrophysical parameters including the morphological types in numerical code @xmath15 . on the other hand , they did not report the detailed morphological types of dwarf galaxies . @xcite provided a better treatment of the morphology of dwarf galaxies , but they confined the dwarfs to within @xmath11mpc . because galaxies in the local universe will provide a unique sample to explore the structural properties of dwarf galaxies , it is important to determine their detailed morphological types . sdss opens a new era of galaxy morphology by providing color images which are useful for obtaining information about the underlying stellar populations . because stellar populations are closely related to the star formation history of galaxies , the morphological types that consider the stellar populations using color information and the light distributions can be considered to be the best proxy for characterizing the integral property of galaxies . the blue elliptical galaxy @xcite , is an example of a new type of galaxy that has emerged in the new era of the galaxy morphology . moreover , it is deep enough to cover dwarf galaxies as faint as @xmath16 in the local universe . another major difference between the morphological properties observed in single - band images and color images were found in the dwarf elliptical ( de ) family . although de galaxies and dwarf spheroidal galaxies ( dsph ) are distinguished in the lg , they were used interchangeably for galaxies outside the lg in previous studies . in particular , @xcite used de and de , n for both de galaxies and dsph galaxies in a classification of virgo cluster dwarfs , whereas @xcite used sph for both galaxies . on the other hand , there appears to be some difference between de and dsph @xcite . for example , de galaxies are generally brighter and redder than dsph galaxies . although the environmental dependence of giant galaxies is well understood thanks to recent surveys , such as sdss @xcite , the dependence of dwarf galaxy morphology on environment has not been well studied due to the lack of dwarf galaxies in previous analyses . therefore , it is important to produce a homogeneous sample of dwarf galaxies with detailed morphological types . because the limiting magnitude of spectroscopic observations of the sdss is @xmath17 , it is possible to make a volume - limited sample brighter than @xmath18 if galaxies with redshift less than @xmath19 are used . this provides an unprecedented opportunity to classify the morphological types of local galaxies using the color images of the sdss dr7 with an emphasis on dwarf galaxies , whose morphological properties are still not well understood . particular attention was paid to the morphologies of de - like galaxies because they are the building blocks of larger structures in cdm cosmology . in particular , dsph are believed to be mostly dark matter dominated dwarfs ( e.g. , gilmore et al . 2007 ) . because de galaxies show different properties from dsph , such as the presence of gas and young stellar populations , at least for the lg dwarfs @xcite , it is important to determine whether they can be distinguished by morphology alone . the aim of this paper is to perform a census of the morphology distribution of local galaxies brighter than @xmath20 . to accomplish this , the morphological types of all sdss galaxies that have redshifts less than @xmath19 are classified by visual inspection of the color images of sdss dr7 . the results are presented in the form of a catalog that includes not only our classificiations , but also numerical t types , adopted distances , absolute @xmath21-band magnitudes , @xmath22 colors , and isophotal angular diameters and axis ratios . an additional aim is to better understand the environment of local galaxies , a factor which can play an important role in morphology . section 2 introduces the observational data used in this study and the procedure for selecting the sample galaxies . section 3 describes the methodology of morphology classification and section 4 provides a catalog of the morphological types of the local galaxies . section 5 presents the physical and morphological properties of the local galaxies and section 6 reports the environmental dependence of the morphology . the final section provides a brief summary and discussion . the basic sample of the local galaxies in this paper was derived from the korea institute for advanced study value - added galaxy catalog ( kias - vagc choi et al . 2010 ) , but was supplemented by galaxies with @xmath23 in the nasa extragalactic data base ( ned ) and the galaxies listed in @xcite that are not overlapped with the galaxies from the kias - vagc and ned . the kias - vagc is a value - added catalog of galaxies based on the new york university value - added catalog ( nyu - vagc ) dr7 which was derived from the sdss dr7 @xcite ) . the kias - vagc provides valuable astrophysical parameters such as absolute magnitude and colors corrected for the galactic extinction as well as distances and morphological types determined by automated classifier @xcite . it also lists the redshifts of 10,497 galaxies that are not included in nyu - vagc . they gathered redshift data from various catalogs ( see choi et al . ( 2010 ) for a detailed description ) . more detailed descriptions of sdss data were reported by @xcite and @xcite . all of the galaxies with redshifts less than 0.01 were selected from the kias - vagc . the color images of the individual galaxies listed in the kias - vagc were examined carefully to determine whether they are parts of a galaxy or multiply listed . a few tens of galaxies were removed from the selected galaxies because of their multiple entry or invalid redshift . the number of cleaned galaxies from kias - vagc is 4807 . in addition , 897 galaxies from ned , whose images and photometric data are available from sdss dr7 , were added . we present the number distribution of the sample galaxies as a function of redshift in figure 1 . the total number of sample galaxies is 5836 . figure 2 shows the distribution of sample galaxies in a color - magnitude diagram . the petrosian @xmath21 magnitude and @xmath22 color are used as the representative magnitude and color of a galaxy because the petrosian @xmath21 magnitude was used to select the spectroscopic target galaxies and the @xmath22 color is one of the best proxies of the galaxy morphology because of its close dependence on the star formation rate @xcite . most galaxies brighter than the limiting magnitude of the sdss spectroscopic target galaxies ( @xmath17 ) are located in a relatively narrow range of @xmath22 colors , whereas galaxies fainter than @xmath17 have a wide range of @xmath22 colors . the color range of galaxies brighter than @xmath17 is similar to that of the volume - limited sample of galaxies brighter than @xmath24 @xcite . the redshifts of galaxies fainter than @xmath17 have been observed by other surveys , such as 2dfgrs @xcite , which is deeper than sdss . figure 3 presents the distribution of @xmath21-band isophotal semi - major axis length ( @xmath25 ) and the axial ratio ( @xmath26 ) of sample galaxies whose isophotal semi - major and semi - minor axis lengths are available in the sdss dr7 . the isophotal axis lengths were measured at an isophote of 25 mag arcsec@xmath27 at each pass - band . most galaxies are larger than @xmath28 pixels . therefore , galaxies in the local universe ( @xmath23 ) are large enough for visual classification . approximately @xmath29 spiral galaxies are inclined more than @xmath30 . these edge - on galaxies comprise @xmath31 of the total galaxies and @xmath32 of spiral galaxies . galaxies less than @xmath33arcsec are mostly face - on galaxies . traditionally , morphological classification has been performed through inspection of photographic plates or prints sensitive to the blue region of the spectrum ( e.g. , de vaucouleurs 1959 ; sandage 1961 ; sandage and tammann 1981 ; sandage and bedke 1994 ) . more recently , galaxies have been classified using logarithmic , sky - subtracted digital @xmath34-band images in units of mag arcsec@xmath27 ( e.g. , buta et al . 2007 ) . therefore , in order to be `` true '' to the traditional classification systems , all of which are built on the original hubble ( 1926 , 1936 ) system , one should use sdss @xmath35-band images since these are close enough in wavelength to the @xmath34 band . in the present study , however , we use the color images provided by the sdss which are based on a combination of @xmath36 images @xcite . for some galaxy types , the use of such images could lead to systematic differences from blue light classifications because the inclusion of the @xmath37 band can enhance the prominence of galactic bulges , which play a role in the t type . our reasons for using color images over @xmath35-band images are twofold . first , color adds information to morphology by its ability to distinguish underlying stellar populations . second , our sample is dominated by galaxies that have very little or no bulge , making the possible impact of the @xmath37 band on t types less of an issue . @xcite show that color gradients and the colors of galaxies are effective for automatic classification . we therefore feel that the use of color images for visual classification is justified . the classification scheme of the morphological types of galaxies is based on the rc3 classification system @xcite , which is the de vaucouleurs revised hubble - sandage system , or vrhs @xcite . the description and sample color images given by @xcite are also consulted . the classification scheme is simplified by neglecting stages of elliptical and lenticular galaxies . that is , the three stages of elliptical galaxies , compact ellipticals ( ce ) , normal ellipticals ( e ) , and late - type ellipticals ( e@xmath38 ) and the three stages of lenticular galaxies , s0@xmath38 , s0@xmath39 and s0@xmath40 are not distinguished . the reason for this is that these e / s0 stages are based mostly on subtle aspects of structure and ignoring them has little impact on our analysis . on the other hand , all of the stages of spiral galaxies from 0/a to m are distinguished . de / dsph galaxies are separated from giant ellipticals because the surface brightness distribution of de galaxies is significantly different from that of the giant elliptical galaxies . elliptical galaxies are believed to have a simple structure . but , thanks to the color information that is sensitive to the underlying stellar populations , it is possible to detect peculiar morphologies induced by recent star formation in elliptical galaxies . the discovery of blue elliptical galaxies showing almost identical shapes to those of normal elliptical galaxies but with different colors @xcite is a good example of the usefulness of color images in extragalactic astronomy . earlier studies of blue elliptical galaxies revealed anomalous blue cores @xcite . for example . ngc 3156 and ngc 4742 have blue cores which are caused by the presence of young stellar populations in the nuclear regions @xcite . the distinction between elliptical galaxies and lenticular galaxies is made mainly by their surface brightness distribution . elliptical galaxies show steeper surface brightness gradients than lenticular galaxies , particularly in the outer parts . this is why the luminosity profiles of elliptical galaxies are best represented by the sersic function with @xmath41 whereas those of lenticular galaxies are best fit by the sersic function with @xmath42 . galaxies with characteristics intermediate between ellipticals and lenticulars are classified as e / s0 . lenticular galaxies are further divided into three bar families , sa0 , sab0 , and sb0 , according to their bar types . the sa0 types show no bar feature , whereas the sb0 types show a clear bar morphology crossing the central bulge . lenticular galaxies with intermediate bar types are assigned as sab0 . in the case of uncertain bar types , mostly due to high inclinations , they are classified as s0 galaxies . for spiral galaxies , the spiral arm morphology is differentiated according to the hubble stages adopted in rc3 @xcite . namely , the stages , 0/a , a , ab , b , bc , c , cd , d , dm , and m , of spiral galaxies are determined according to the relative size of the bulge and the openness of the spiral arms . on the other hand , the spiral varieties , ( r ) and ( s ) , are not distinguished because they are less fundamental than stage and family , and , as for the e / s0 stages , ignoring them has little or no impact on our analysis . we also exclude recognition of outer rings and pseudorings for the same reason . therefore , for example , a strongly barred spiral galaxy with an intermediate hubble stage is denoted as sbc , whereas a non - barred spiral galaxy with an intermediate hubble stage is denoted sac . for edge - on spirals , the bar families are not distinguished in this study and the hubble stage is denoted as sa , sab , sb , etc . irregular galaxies are divided into three types : i m , dwarf irregular ( di ) , and bcd . the first type , i m , is a natural extension of the late - type spirals and some i m galaxies are believed to have a bar component . in that case , a morphological type , ibm , is assigned . the second type , di , represents small dwarf galaxies with an amorphous shape . their physical properties , such as size , luminosity , and colors are similar to those of dsph and de@xmath2 galaxies , which are described below . the last type , bcd , stands for the blue compact dwarf and is characterized by star burst regions . they have amorphous shapes with high central surface brightness , and are likely to show an outer irregular envelope . however , there is no unique definition of bcd in the literature @xcite but the morphological properties of bcds in the present sample are similar to those of the bcds analyzed by @xcite . the shapes of bcd galaxies without an outer irregular envelope , i.e. , hii region - like bcds , are similar to the small blue dwarf elliptical galaxy ( de@xmath2 ) described below . bcds show an extremely blue color due to bursts of star formation . a significant fraction of irregular galaxies have small star burst regions . these galaxies are distinguished from i m and di as well as bcd . we designate these galaxies as ir / bcd . in addition to di galaxies , there are five types of dwarf galaxies : dwarf lenticular galaxies ( ds0 ) , de galaxies , blue - cored dwarf elliptical galaxies ( de@xmath43 ) , dsph galaxies , and de@xmath2 galaxies . we designate these five dwarf galaxies as de - like galaxies . the dwarf lenticular galaxies were introduced by @xcite for the morphological classification of dwarf galaxies in the virgo cluster . they are characterized by lens - like features that have a shallow brightness gradient interior to a sharp edge . ( see buta ( 2013 ) for further discussion of lenses in disk galaxies . ) in this respect , ds0 galaxies are different from their giant cousins , s0 galaxies , which are characterized by a bulge and a disk . a majority of ds0 galaxies show nucleation . the presence and absence of nucleation are distinguished by the subscripts @xmath44 and @xmath45 as ds0@xmath46 and ds0@xmath47 for a nucleated one and an un - nucleated one , respectively . some dwarf galaxies exhibit similar characteristics to ds0 galaxies but the outer parts of these galaxies show disturbed disks , mostly resembling disrupted spiral arms . these galaxies are classified as ds0@xmath48 . we do not distinguish ds0@xmath48 galaxies from ds0 galaxies , except for the description of a detailed morphology . de galaxies can be distinguished from giant elliptical galaxies by their surface brightness distribution , which is better represented by the sersic function with @xmath49 . most previous studies do not distinguish between de galaixes and dsph galaxies ( eg . , binggeli et al . 1985 ; kormendy & bender 2012 ) . in particular , @xcite use sph to represent spheroidal galaxies that can be placed in a position parallel to the i m galaxies in their revised parallel - sequence galaxy classification , which extends the van den bergh parallel - sequence galaxy classification @xcite . they assumed that the sph galaxies are stripped scd - im galaxies . however , our study considers dsph galaxies as a distinct population of dwarf galaxies because photometric properties , such as surface brightness and colors of dsph galaxies , seem to be different from those of de galaxies . moreover , if we consider that dsph galaxies are mostly dispersion - supported systems @xcite while a considerable fraction of de galaxies are supported by rotation @xcite , their origins might be different . the de and dsph galaxies are distinguished by their surface brightness while de@xmath2 galaxies are distinguished from others by their blue color . the de@xmath43 galaxies are characterized by the presence of blue cores which are supposed to be regions of active star formation . the de and dsph galaxies are further distinguished by their nuclear morphology : de@xmath47 , de@xmath46 , dsph@xmath47 and dsph@xmath46 . the distinction of nucleated dwarfs from un - nulceated dwarfs is somewhat arbitrary because the degree of nucleation varies continuously @xcite . blue - cored dwarfs , however , are easily distinguished from nucleated dwarfs because the cores are bluer and larger than the nuclear region of nucleated dwarfs . blue dwarf ellipticals ( de@xmath2 ) have similar color to irregular galaxies . their size is similar to or smaller than hii region - like bcds . small de@xmath2 and di galaxies have similar features except for the axial symmetry . on the other hand , there is no clear distinction in the degree of axial symmetry for de@xmath2 . therefore , it seems plausible that de@xmath2 galaxies are di galaxies with an extreme axial symmetry . for practical purposes , the numerical type @xmath50 borrowed from rc3 is used with some simplification for the ellipticals ( @xmath50=-5 ) and lenticulars ( @xmath50=-3 ) . however , we keep all of the hubble stages from t=0 to t=9 for spirals ( from @xmath51 to @xmath52 ) and @xmath50=10 ( i m ) and @xmath50=11 ( di ) for irregulars . bcd is assigned as @xmath50=13 , while irregulars containing small bcd - like components as @xmath50=12 . also , we assign new codes from -6 to -11 for dwarf elliptical - like galaxies : @xmath50=-6 ( de ) , @xmath50=-7 ( de@xmath43 ) , @xmath50=-8 ( dsph ) , @xmath50=-9 ( de@xmath2 ) , @xmath50=-10 ( ds0 , ds0@xmath48 ) , and @xmath50=-11 for transition type dwarf ( des / di di / des ) , respectively . in the present study , the color images of the sub - sample of galaxies were examined using the image display tool provided by the sdss for training before the classification of the full sample of galaxies . the morphological types given in the ned were consulted during the training period . because the number of subtypes to be classified is more than 20 , morphological types were classified in two steps . galaxies were divided into four broad types ( elliptical / lenticulars , spirals , irregulars , and de - like galaxies ) , and their fine subtypes were then classified after sorting the galaxies according to their broad types . the entire sample of galaxies was classified by each of the three authors . we followed two steps to finalize the morphological types of galaxies . in the first step , one of the authors ( seo ) determined the morphological types of the entire sample by consulting the results of other authors . the final morphological type of each galaxy was determined by the senior author after reviewing seo s classification . there is not much difference between the final morphological types and those of seo for giant galaxies ( e , s0 , and sp ) and irregular galaxies . however , about @xmath53 of seo s classification of de - like galaxies are revised , mostly within the category of de - like galaxies . + figure 4 shows representative images of elliptical , lenticular , spiral , and irregular galaxies classified in the present study . the elliptical and lenticular galaxies are displayed in the first and second rows , respectively . spiral galaxies are presented in the third , fourth , and fifth rows , and are grouped according to the bar types ( sa , sab , and sb ) . the spiral galaxies are arranged according to the hubble stage ( a , b , c , d , and m ) with the earliest types ( saa , saba , and sba ) in the leftmost column and the latest types ( sam , sabm , and sbm ) in the rightmost column . the irregular galaxies are presented in the sixth row . the first three columns present i m , di , and ir / bcd galaxies , respectively , whereas the fourth column and the fifth column display a bcd embedded in an irregular envelope and a bcd resembling hii regions , respectively . different scales are used for each stamp image in figure 4 for a better demonstration of their morphology . figure 5 shows images of de - like galaxies . the first and second rows display images of dwarf lenticular galaxies , with normal dwarf lenticulars ( ds0 ) in the first row and dwarf lenticular galaxies with peculiar disk morphology ( ds0@xmath48 ) in the second row . the morphology of ds0 galaxies is characterized by the presence of a lens - like feature in addition to the disk component . lens - like features are normally redder than the disk but some ds0 galaxies have blue lens - like features due to young stellar populations near the nuclei . the galaxies in the third rows are de galaxies . we arranged de@xmath47 galaxies in the first and second columns and de@xmath46 galaxies from third to fifth columns . in the fourth row , we display de@xmath43 galaxies that show intense star formation in the nuclei of the galaxies . the nuclear star formation is thought to be caused by recent gas accretion @xcite . the fifth and sixth rows show dsph and de@xmath2 , respectively the dsph galaxies are generally fainter and bluer than the de galaxies . some de@xmath2 galaxies have large blue cores , the radius of which is approximately half the galaxy size . in addition to these types of galaxies , there are compact elliptical galaxies that are occasionally observed near the centers of clusters . they are smaller than the giant elliptical galaxies but their central surface brightness is similar to that of giant elliptical galaxies . due to their high surface brightness , they are classified as compact elliptical galaxies rather than de galaxies . a prototype of compact elliptical galaxies is m32 in the lg . this section presents a catalog of the visually classified morphological types of 5836 galaxies whose redshifts are less than @xmath19 . the basic statistics of the morphological types of the local galaxies are reported along with a brief comparison with other studies . in addition , the new morphological types revealed from color images are briefly described . the morphological types of 5836 galaxies are presented along with some basic data obtained from the sdss dr7 . table 1 lists a part of the morphological catalog of local galaxies whose full content is available in the electronic version of this paper . the sdss object identification number is used as the name of a galaxy but the primary ned name is presented in the last column for reference . this paper uses the distance of a galaxy derived from the heliocentric redshift corrected for the motion of the lg . we used the prescription of @xcite to derive the velocity relative to the centroid of the lg ( @xmath12 ) . on the other hand , for those galaxies lying inside a @xmath54-cone around m87 with a heliocentric redshift less than z=0.007 @xcite , the distance of the virgo cluster is used . a hubble constant of h=75kms@xmath13 was used . the catalog contains 12 columns with the following information . + + + + + + + corrected for the galactic extinction @xcite . the sdss model magnitude is a magnitude derived by best - fitting model ( exponential profile or de vaucouleurs profile ) to the observed images . + + + + + ccrrrrrrrrcr 587731514215760014 & 17.283075 & 1.121029 & 0.003855 & di & 10 & 17.5 & -14.79 & 0.73 & 44.7 & 0.5 & shoc053 + 588015510351118339 & 18.232364 & 0.981506 & 0.003843 & sabdm & 8 & 17.43 & -18.79 & 1.86 & -9 & -9 & ngc0428 + 588015510351184046 & 18.413968 & 0.875452 & 0.003873 & sm / im & 10 & 17.55 & -13.73 & 0.69 & 26.2 & 0.71 & ugc00772 + 588015510351249607 & 18.584742 & 0.916687 & 0.003717 & di & 10 & 16.92 & -14.77 & 1.05 & 41.4 & 0.5 & sdssj011420.41 + 005503.2 + 588015507666960497 & 18.719523 & -1.095353 & 0.006761 & ds0n & -10 & 29.05 & -16.02 & 1.45 & 40.4 & 0.62 & sdssj011452.68 - 010543.2 + 587743981974650974 & 18.84512 & 8.099593 & 0.007812 & sacd & 6 & 33.24 & -17.09 & 2.39 & 61.4 & 0.74 & ugc00803 + 587731511532060697 & 18.876839 & -0.86098 & 0.005874 & sabcd & 6 & 25.51 & -18.95 & 1.54 & 149.1 & 0.77 & ngc0450 + 587731511532191838 & 19.087214 & -0.911365 & 0.005576 & di & 10 & 24.32 & -15.12 & 1.07 & 26.9 & 0.85 & sdssj011620.92 - 005440.8 + 758877280840910682 & 19.106185 & 33.431996 & -0.000627 & dsphun & -8 & 0.64 & -10.52 & 2.62 & 4.7 & 0.74 & andii + 758877278149148728 & 19.18239 & 16.400064 & 0.006615 & saa & 1 & 28.46 & -18.74 & 1.74 & 88.2 & 0.76 & cgcg459 - 021 + 587727226772258858 & 19.377137 & -9.296768 & 0.006479 & sam & 9 & 27.91 & -16.47 & 1.11 & 73.9 & 0.37 & sdssj011730.51 - 091748.3 + 587727179531747451 & 19.809026 & -9.597428 & 0.006379 & im / bcd & 12 & 27.5 & -14.81 & 1.16 & 29.5 & 0.43 & shoc061 + 587731512606326893 & 20.028347 & -0.205448 & 0.00581 & sdm & 8 & 25.23 & -17.18 & 1.52 & 106.6 & 0.29 & ugc00866 + 588015510351970406 & 20.26232 & 0.851495 & 0.008134 & di & 10 & 34.48 & -15.83 & 1.02 & 24.4 & 0.69 & sdssj012102.95 + 005105.3 + 587744045327319127 & 20.364876 & 7.018498 & 0.007495 & sa & 1 & 31.94 & -19.3 & 1.65 & 111 & 0.39 & ngc0485 + 588015509278359598 & 20.522909 & 0.08518 & 0.007569 & sadm & 8 & 32.23 & -15.84 & 1.58 & 77.8 & 0.14 & fgc0156 + 588015510352101409 & 20.537435 & 0.945465 & 0.007799 & scd & 6 & 33.14 & -19.91 & 1.92 & 310.6 & 0.19 & ngc0493 + 588015508204748937 & 20.810885 & -0.700637 & 0.006625 & sd & 7 & 28.46 & -16.83 & 1.38 & 88.3 & 0.23 & ugc00931 + 587743980364955756 & 20.93191 & 6.691629 & 0.007789 & sabcd & 6 & 33.09 & -17.14 & 1.74 & 50.7 & 0.96 & ugc00942 + rrrrrr number & 86 & 1092 & 286 & 1878 & 2498 + fraction & 0.015 & 0.187 & 0.049 & 0.321 & 0.428 + figure 6 presents the frequency distribution of the broad morphological types of 5836 galaxies . irregular galaxies are most abundant ( @xmath55 ) , and spiral galaxies are second - most abundant ( @xmath56 ) . these two types comprise @xmath57 of the local galaxies . the fractions of elliptical galaxies and lenticular galaxies are @xmath58 and @xmath59 , respectively . the fraction of de - like galaxies is @xmath60 . if we exclude the ds0 galaxies , it becomes @xmath61 . therefore , they are 10 times more frequent than their giant cousins , elliptical galaxies . the local universe is dominated by dwarf galaxies because the majority of irregular galaxies are dwarf galaxies . table 2 lists the basic statistics of the morphological types of galaxies presented in this catalog ( table 1 ) . figure 7 shows the frequency of the hubble stages ( top panel ) and that of the bar family ( bottom panel ) . the hubble stages are grouped into three stages of early ( e ) , intermediate ( m ) , and late ( l ) . the edge - on galaxies are included in the frequency distribution of the hubble stages but they are not included in the frequency distributions of the bar family . the number of spirals increases from the early types to the late types . the fraction of barred galaxies ( sab and sb ) is @xmath62 which is similar to the bar fraction in rc3 @xcite and that derived from the mid - ir images of nearby galaxies @xcite but somewhat higher than those derived from the sdss galaxies at @xmath63 @xcite . the bar fraction from the ellipse fitting technique ( e.g. , barazza et al . 2009 ) is somewhat lower than the visual classifications but that from fourier analysis @xcite is somewhat higher than that in the present study . the difference in the bar fractions is due mostly to the classification method and the criteria for bar selection . the lowest bar fraction from the sdss data is that derived by @xcite who reported a bar fraction of @xmath64 . figure 8 shows the frequency distribution of the subtypes of de - like galaxies ; de , de@xmath43 , dsph , de@xmath2 , and ds0 . as shown in figure 8 , the dominant population of the de - like galaxies is de@xmath2 galaxies , which is distinguished from the others by its blue color . the second largest population is dsph galaxies , but if de@xmath43 galaxies are considered to be a special type of de , then the number of de is similar to that for dsph . the ds0 galaxies include ds0@xmath48 galaxies which show signatures of spiral arm structures in the outer parts . figure 9 shows the frequency distributions of @xmath22 colors for the subtypes of de - like galaxies with those of di for comparisons . the de galaxies show the reddest color with narrow color ranges , whereas the de@xmath2 galaxies show the bluest color similar to that of di galaxies . the dsph galaxies show redder colors than de@xmath43 and de@xmath2 . their average color is similar to that of de galaxies but they have a u - r color distribution extended to blue colors up to @xmath65 . this classification is compared with the automated classification @xcite given in kias - vagc . because they presented broad morphological types ( early and late types ) only , the types in this study were also grouped into early and late types . the early type includes ellipticals ( e ) and lenticulars ( s0 ) with their dwarf cousins ( de , de@xmath43 , dsph , de@xmath2 , and ds0 ) and the late type includes spirals ( sp ) and irregulars ( ir ) . spiral galaxies show the best match ( @xmath66 ) and de - like galaxies show the worst match ( @xmath67 ) between the present classification and that reported by @xcite . ellipticals ( e ) and irregulars ( ir ) also show good matches of @xmath68 , whereas lenticulars show fair matches ( @xmath69 ) . the low match between the present classification and @xcite for de - like galaxies is due mostly to the extremely high mismatch of de ( de@xmath47 and de@xmath46 ) and dsph ( dsph@xmath47 and dsph@xmath46 ) , which show only @xmath70 matches . for both de and dsph , the un - nucleated ones show better matches . the worst match was found for nucleated dwarf spheroidals ( dsph@xmath46 ) which showed only a @xmath71 match . on the other hand , de@xmath43 and de@xmath2 show the @xmath72 matches . the reason for the worse classification of de and dsph galaxies appears to be the small number of dwarf ellipticals in the training sample of @xcite . in the case of de@xmath43 and de@xmath2 galaxies , they included a sufficient number in their training sample . figure 10 compares the morphological types determined in this study with those from ned . we use the numerical type @xmath50 adopted in the present catalog with three additional codes : @xmath50=12 , @xmath50=13 , and @xmath50=14 . the first and second ones are used for the ned i0 galaxies and bcd galaxies , respectively . the last one is assigned to the spiral galaxies with no hubble stage . they are usually given as s ? or sb ? , which suggests an uncertain morphology . in addition to these types , @xmath50=-7 is assigned to de - like galaxies . the circle sizes in figure 10 are proportional to the fractions of the types classified in the present study . as shown in figure 10 , there is good agreement between the present types and those from the ned . on the other hand , there are two types that show a considerable difference . one type is elliptical galaxies ( @xmath50=-5 ) and the other is i0 galaxies ( @xmath50=12 ) . some bias in the classification of s0/a galaxies can be seen . the ned s0/a galaxies ( @xmath50=0 ) are classified mainly as one of the three types , s0 , s0/a , and sa . if the s0/a is highest , as in figure 10 , then the sa fraction would be slightly higher than the others . for elliptical galaxies , approximately half of the ned ellipticals are classified as lenticulars or de - like galaxies in the present study . this is expected because there is frequent confusion between elliptical and lenticular galaxies in the literature . note that most ned lenticular galaxies are classified as lenticular galaxies , whereas ned elliptical galaxies are classified frequently as lenticular galaxies . the confusion between ellipticals and de - like galaxies is also conceivable because they differ only in the surface brightness and its gradient . as shown in figure 10 , ellipticals are more likely to be misclassified as dwarf ellipticals / spheroidals than lenticulars . i0 is a special type of irregular galaxy . it is not so irregular because it is not as disorganized , which is the main characteristics of irregular galaxies . i0 galaxies show a smooth structure similar to lenticular galaxies but have central irregular zones of active star formation @xcite . this type is not included as a separate class because they do not have properties that can be easily distinguishable from other types of galaxies . recent observations show that many elliptical / lenticular galaxies show similar features in their central regions . as expected , most i0 galaxies are classified in the present study as either lenticular galaxies ( @xmath50=-3 ) or irregular galaxies ( @xmath50=10 ) . * in the mid - ir , i0s like ngc 2968 , 3077 , and 5195 are much more regular and the class is no longer applicable @xcite . * a considerable difference between the present types and ned types can also be observed in bcd galaxies ( @xmath50=13 ) . most of our bcds are also classified as bcds in ned . however , the majority of ned bcds are classfied as irregulars ( @xmath50=10 ) . this is due to those ir / bcd galaxies which are considered as irregular galaxies in our classification but most of which are classified as bcds in ned . confusion with irregular galaxies is natural because many irregular galaxies have star burst regions , which is a basic characteristic of bcds . such irregular galaxies are considered to be bcds in the present study only if the star burst regions are large enough to dominate the luminosities of galaxies . the introduction of de@xmath2 galaxies is another cause of the large mismatch between the ned bcds and our types for these galaxies . similar fractions of ned bcds are classified as bcds and de@xmath2 galaxies in our classification . some de@xmath2 galaxies are small enough , i.e. , comparable to hii region - like bcds with similarly blue color with the bcd color . the circles at @xmath50=-7 represent early - type dwarf galaxies . they are not divided into subtypes of de , de@xmath43 , de@xmath2 , dsph , and ds0 because the ned types were not finely defined . most ned early - type dwarfs are classified by us as early - type dwarfs but a small fraction of ned early type dwarfs are classified as irregular galaxies . a better comparison of early - type dwarfs with others is given below ( figure 13 ) . finally , the small circles at @xmath50=14 represent spiral galaxies with no hubble stages in ned . most spiral galaxies we classify as spirals but some are classified as lenticulars , early - type dwarfs , irregulars , and bcds . figure 11 compares the present types with those of rc3 @xcite . we used the same convention of @xmath50 type . as shown in figure 10 and figure 11 , the two comparisons are very similar . this similarity is due to the fact that most of the ned types come from rc3 . for the galaxies in the present catalog , @xmath73 of ned types come from rc3 . the absence of galaxies at @xmath50 ( rc3)=13 is due to the lack of bcd types in rc3 . there are 18 galaxies whose morphological types are classified as peculiar galaxies ( p ) in rc3 . the majority of these galaxies are classified as irregulars ( 7 galaxies ) and bcds ( 5 galaxies ) . the remaining 6 galaxies consist of four spirals , one lenticular galaxy , and one de galaxy . figure 12 shows the comparison of the morphological types with those in the virgo cluster catalog ( binggeli et al . 1985 , hereafter vcc ) . since in vcc , ds0 galaxies are distiguished from other de - like galaxies , we assign @xmath50 ( vcc)=-6 to des and @xmath50 ( vcc)=-10 to ds0 in figure 12 . however , we keep our subtypes of de ( -6 ) , de@xmath43 ( -7 ) , dsph ( -8 ) , de@xmath2 ( -9 ) , ds0 ( -10 ) , and des / di ( -11 ) in figure 12 to see how vcc des distribute in our de - like galaxies . for the types from @xmath50=-5 to @xmath50=14 , we used the same conventions as those in figure 11 . as shown in figure 12 , there is a fairly good agreement between the morphological types determined in this study and those in vcc . however , the degree of agreement is worse than rc3 , especially for the hubble stages of spiral galaxies later than @xmath50 ( vcc)=3 . the best agreement between this study and vcc is observed for lenticular galaxies . elliptical galaxies also give quite good agreement . on the other hand , the greatest discrepancy between this study and vcc is observed for vcc bcds . the majority of vcc bcds are classified as irregulars in this study . there are two dwarf spiral galaxies in vcc . one is ic 3094 , which is given a type of @xmath74ds?@xmath75 . the ned type of this galaxy is @xmath74s ; bcd@xmath75 and we classified it as @xmath74saa@xmath75 . the other is ngc 4192 which is calssified as @xmath74d : sc@xmath75 in vcc . we classified it as @xmath74sacd@xmath75 while ned gives @xmath74sab(s)ab@xmath75 . figure 13 compares the types in this study with those reported by @xcite . these studies ( kn hereafter ) include the updated nearby galaxy catalog . we plot the fractional distributions of the morphological types of galaxies in the kn that are listed in our catalog . our morphological types are grouped into five broad types e , des , s0 , sp , and ir , and we display the fractional frequency distributions of @xmath50 in kn at each panel , which are labeled according to morphological type with the number of galaxies in parentheses . the @xmath50 codes adopted by @xcite , which are slightly different from the @xmath50 codes used in the present catalog , are used for convenience . the elliptical galaxies are presented in the top panel . there are only 16 shared galaxies , 9 of which are classified as ellipticals in kn while all of the other galaxies except one ( mcg-01 - 33 - 007 ) are classified as des or lenticulars . the type @xmath50=-2 and @xmath50=-3 were assigned for de and dsph , respectively , in kn . the second panel shows the fractional distribution of the morphological types of galaxies classified as de - like galaxies in our catalog . our dwarf galaxies designated as des include de , de@xmath43 , dsph , de@xmath2 , and ds0s . here , we present here 131 des that are shared with kn . as shown in the second panel of figure 13 , there is a significant disagreement in the morphological types between ours and theose of kn . among 130 des , 18 galaxies are classified as irregular galaxies and 42 galaxies as spirals , which are mostly late - types of stages dm and m ( @xmath50=8 ) . the third panel from the top in figure 13 shows 48 lenticulars listed in the present catalog , which show a wide range of @xmath50 in @xcite . about @xmath76 of our lenticular galaxies are classified as @xmath50=-1 , which is assumed to designate lenticular galaxies in kn . among the 22 galaxies that were not classified as lenticulars in kn , 4 galaxies are ellipticals and 5 are des . in particular , 10 galaxies that correspond to @xmath77 of the s0 galaxies are classified as early - type spirals of stage @xmath51 and @xmath25 . the fourth panel from the top shows the fractional distribution of the kn morphological types for our spiral galaxies . there is a good agreement between the current classification and those in kn . the fraction of spirals with @xmath78 is @xmath79 , which is in good agreement with that of the present catalog ( @xmath80 ) . as shown in the bottom panel of figure 13 , most of irregular galaxies ( @xmath81 ) are classified as @xmath50=8 , @xmath50=9 , and @xmath50=10 in the kn where late - type spiral galaxies ( dm and m ) , irregulars including bcds , and transition types are classified as @xmath50=8 , @xmath50=9 , and @xmath50=10 , respectively . the absolute @xmath21-band magnitude and @xmath22 color are basic properties of a galaxy . the former is related directly to the mass of a galaxy , which is the most important parameter in the formation and evolution of the galaxy , whereas the latter is closely related to the star formation history . because most of the sample galaxies do not have redshift - independent distances , we use redshift - dependent distances for all of them to calculate @xmath82 . we corrected the motion of the lg following @xcite but the k - correction and evolution correction are not applied in the derivation of @xmath82 because they are negligibly small for local galaxies . figure 14 shows the @xmath22 color versus @xmath82 diagram of the 5836 galaxies listed in the present morphological catalog . some features should be noted . first , galaxies with a different morphology occupy different parts of the color - magnitude diagram . the so called red sequence is well defined from @xmath83 to @xmath84 within which the luminosity - color relationship is well established . the upper part of the red sequence consists of elliptical galaxies and s0 galaxies ( red color ) , whereas the lower part consists of de - like galaxies ( cyan color ) . they overlap around @xmath85 , which suggests that @xmath86 is the bright limit of dwarf galaxies . second , irregular galaxies ( blue color ) display the blue cloud . they are clustered around the mean values of @xmath87 and @xmath88 , respectively . some de - like galaxies are located in the blue cloud . they are mostly de@xmath2 galaxies . third , spiral galaxies are located mostly in the green valley . the majority of spiral galaxies are brighter than the dwarf limit of @xmath86 but a non - negligible fraction of spiral galaxies are fainter than @xmath86 . this is due mainly to the late - type spiral galaxies of the hubble stages d , dm , and m. finally , there are a number of galaxies whose photometry needs to be refined . for example , galaxies located in the far red envelope of the red sequence are probably due to poor photometry , even though some are due to heavy extinction . in addition , @xmath82 of galaxies fainter than @xmath89 are also due mostly to poor photometry . figure 15 shows the fractional frequency distributions indicating the luminosity distribution of local galaxies . the galaxies are grouped according to their broad morphological types : e , des , s0 , sp , and ir . although hii region - like bcd galaxies are supposed to be dwarf galaxies similar to de@xmath2 , we grouped all the bcds as a subtype of the ir class because the majority of bcd components are imbeded in the irregular galaxies . luminosity distributions of galaxies with different morphological types differ significantly . elliptical galaxies show a highly asymmetric distribution that peaks at m@xmath90 , whereas des and irregular galaxies show symmetrical distributions with similar peak magnitudes of m@xmath91 . lenticular galaxies show a narrower distribution than elliptical galaxies with a peak at m@xmath92 . among the three giant galaxies , e , s0 , and sp , spiral galaxies show the most symmetrical distribution with a peak luminosity at m@xmath93 . therefore , spiral galaxies are likely to be faintest among the three types of giant galaxies . it is due to the dominance of late - type spirals which becomes fainter toward the later hubble stages @xcite . figure 16 presents the @xmath22 color distributions of the local galaxies which are sorted according to the broad morphological types . the color distributions depend more strongly on the morphological types than the luminosity distribution . the dependence of the color distribution on the morphological type is expected because the color of a galaxy is a widely used proxy of the galaxy morphology . as shown in figure 16 , elliptical galaxies show the narrowest color distribution centered on @xmath94 . approximately @xmath95 of elliptical galaxies have @xmath22 colors between 2.2 and 3.0 . the blue elliptical galaxies , which comprise @xmath96 of all elliptical galaxies , have a blue tail . lenticular galaxies are also likely to have red colors similar to elliptical galaxies . approximately @xmath69 of lenticulars have @xmath22 colors redder than 2.2 . on the other hand , spiral galaxies are likely to have blue colors . approximately @xmath97 of spiral galaxies have @xmath22 colors bluer than @xmath98 . this makes their color distribution significantly different from that of lenticular galaxies . this shows that the use of the colors of a galaxy as a proxy for the galaxy morphology will make a significant contamination inevitable . the color distribution of de - like galaxies shows a double peak , one at @xmath99 and the other at @xmath100 . the blue peak is caused by the blue colors of de@xmath2 galaxies and the red peak is due to de and dsph galaxies . the irregular galaxies show a completely different color distribution from the others . their peak @xmath22 color is 1.2 , which is 0.4 mag bluer than that of spiral galaxies . only @xmath31 of irregular galaxies are redder than @xmath98 . figure 17 shows the luminosity function of the local galaxies , which extends to @xmath20 , together with the best - fitted schechter luminosity function @xcite of the form @xmath101^{\alpha+1}exp[-10^{-0.4(m - m^{\star})}]dm,\ ] ] where @xmath102 is the characteristic luminosity of a galaxy and @xmath103 is the number density in units of mpc@xmath104 . we determined the three parameters , @xmath105 , @xmath106 , and @xmath107 by minimizing @xmath108 . the drop at @xmath109 is attributed to the observation limit of the sdss spectroscopic observation , which is set to @xmath1 . this confines the volume - limited sample to galaxies brighter than @xmath18 . the rapid drop at @xmath110 is somewhat different from the luminosity functions of galaxies derived from the different volume - limited samples of different limiting magnitudes . @xcite derived the luminosity functions for six volume - limited samples from sdss dr4plus . their slopes are much shallower than the slope of the present luminosity function . the reason for the steeper gradient , i.e. , the smaller @xmath111 in the schechter functions , for the present sample is that the local volume is less dense than the regions outside the local universe . a similar trend for the steeper gradient in the luminosity functions of nearer samples was also observed among the volume - limited samples @xcite . the size of a galaxy can be defined in a variety of ways . we adopted the isophotal semi - major axis length as a representative radius of the local galaxies . isophotal diameters can be affected by galactic extinction and inclination . we suppose that galactic extinction is negligible for the present sample due to the sdss - covered area , however , inclination might affect the isophotal diameter . there have been a number of studies on the effect of inclination on the isophotal diameter @xcite . while @xcite assumed that the change in diameter due to the inclination of a galaxy is negligible , @xcite thought that the inclination effects are need to be corrected . however , as shown by @xcite and @xcite , it depends on the optical nature of galaxies . in the case of spiral galaxies , their disks are believed to be optically thick @xcite , whereas the disks of lenticular galaxies are thought to be optically thin @xcite . the isophotal diameters of optically thin disks increase with inclination . the isophotal radius is calculated from the isophotal semi - major axis of the @xmath21-band image obtained from sdss dr7 . the isophotal semi - major and semi - minor axes are measured at a surface brightness ( @xmath112 ) of 25 mag arcsec@xmath27 at five pass - bands ( @xmath113 ) in the sdss , and are given in units of pixels . the isophotal axis lengths in the pixels are converted to kiloparsecs using a pixel size of 0.396 arcsec and the distances used to calculate the absolute magnitude . this isophotal radius is close to the holmberg radius which is measured at @xmath114 mag arcsec@xmath27 . figure 18 shows the frequency distribution of the isophotal radii of local galaxies sorted according to their broad morphological types : e , des , s0 , sp , and ir . as shown in figure 18 , the distributions of the isophotal radii of galaxies depend strongly on the morphological types of the galaxies . as expected , de - like galaxies show the narrowest distribution , which peaked at @xmath115kpc , and are limited to @xmath116kpc . the ir class of galaxies shows a similar narrow distribution with the same peak but it extends to @xmath117kpc . this is because most ir galaxies are dwarf galaxies with sizes similar to des . some galaxies larger than @xmath118kpc are late - type spiral - like galaxies or peculiar galaxies , some of which are merging galaxies . the ranges of isophotal radii of the ellipticals and lenticulars are similar , even though there are large fluctuations in the ellipticals due to the small number of galaxies . interestingly , the most probable sizes of the lenticulars and spirals are similar to each other ( @xmath119kpc ) whereas the ranges of the distributions are significantly different . the sizes of the largest spirals are about two times larger than those of the lenticulars . the same is true for those elliptical galaxies which show a similar size distribution to that of the lenticular galaxies . the reason for the double size of the spiral galaxies is thought to be the late accretion of the intergalactic material @xcite , which makes the inside - out growth of galaxies similar to that assumed for the formation of the milky way . the basic properties of a galaxy such as mass , luminosity , radius , and morphology are believed to be determined by the galaxy formation process . these parameters are supposed to be correlated with each other because they have the same origin . the radius - luminosity relation @xcite is an example of such a correlation . because the galaxy size depends on the morphology , as shown in figure 18 , the interplay between the size and luminosity is supposed to be more complex . there have been many studies to investigate the morphology dependence of the radius - luminosity relation of galaxies since the pioneering work by @xcite . most of the previous studies used proxies of galaxy morphology rather than morphology itself @xcite . for example , @xcite used the concentration index as a proxy of the morphology . as is well known from previous studies @xcite , proxies are at best a crude approximation of galaxy morphological types . in this regard , @xcite distinguished early - type galaxies and late - type galaxies by visual inspection of the images for an analysis of the structure of central galaxies in groups and clusters . therefore , the morphological types presented in this study will be useful to explore the interplay between the size and luminosity of galaxies . we are planning to do this in a series of forthcoimng papers . we are particularly interested in the radius - luminosity relation of dwarf galaxies . the axial ratio of a galaxy ( @xmath26 ) is closely related to the intrinsic shape of the galaxy , which is determined by its dynamical structure . figure 19 shows the fractional frequency distributions of the axis ratios of 5836 galaxies sorted according to their morphological types . the isophotal semi - major and semi - minor axes in @xmath21-band , which are measured at a surface brightness of 25 mag arcsec@xmath27 , are used . figure 19 plots the three morphological types of giant galaxies ( e , s0 , and sp ) compared to their dwarf cousins ( de and ds0 ) for e and s0 galaxies and irregular galaxies for spiral galaxies . the axis ratio distributions of the ellipticals and de ( left panel ) are similar , whereas a significant difference was observed in the lenticular and dwarf lenticular galaxies ( middle panel ) as well as in spiral galaxies ( right panel ) . the solid lines represent the giant galaxies and the dotted lines indicate the dwarf counterparts . although the general shapes of the axis ratio distributions of the giant elliptical galaxies and de galaxies are similar , there are some differences between the two . dwarf elliptical galaxies have a higher fraction of galaxies with @xmath120 than giant elliptical galaxies , even though the smallest @xmath26 is observed in a giant elliptical galaxy . on the other hand , the morphological type of this galaxy ( ngc 2768 ) is controversial . it is classified as e6 in rc3 , whereas the morphological type adopted by the ned is s0 , which was taken from the carnegie atlas of galaxies @xcite . the more flattened structure of de galaxies is consistent with those observations showing fast rotation in a considerable fraction of de galaxies @xcite . on the contrary , the general similarity of the axis ratio distributions of the giant and dwarf elliptical galaxies suggests that a large fraction of dwarf elliptical galaxies are dispersion - supported systems like giant elliptical galaxies . the dissimilarity of the axis ratio distributions of giant and dwarf lenticular galaxies is quite interesting because ds0s are considered to be low - luminosity versions of s0s @xcite . the axis ratio distribution for ds0s in figure 19 seems to show well that the ds0s should not be thought of as small versions of s0s . rather , they are close to de galaxies because their axis ratio distribution is similar to that of de galaxies . the lack of ds0s with an isophotal axis ratio ( @xmath26 ) less than 0.3 suggests that they are intrinsically thicker than s0s . the lack of small axis ratios is also observed in de and irregulars , suggesting less flattened shapes for these galaxies . the thick intrinsic shape of irregular galaxies is consistent with earlier studies @xcite . the dissimilar distributions of the axis ratios of spiral galaxies and irregular galaxies shown in the right panel of figure 19 are believed to be caused by the real difference in their dynamical structures because the statistical noises are small enough to be ignored due to the large number of spiral and irregular galaxies . in the case of lenticular galaxies , the axis ratio distribution of which is supposed to be similar to that of the spiral galaxies . we can see a large fluctuation in the histogram due to the small number of lenticular galaxies , which is about one - seventh that of the spiral galaxies . the larger fraction of small axis ratios in spiral galaxies is due to the rotating disks of spiral galaxies , the orientations of which are random , whereas the lack of small axis ratios in the irregular galaxies is believed to be due to the triaxial nature of irregular galaxies @xcite . figure 20 shows the fractional distribution of the axis ratios of the dwarf elliptical - like galaxies ; de@xmath43 galaxies in the left panel , dsph galaxies in the middle panel , and de@xmath2 galaxies in the right panel . the axis ratio distribution of de galaxies ( dotted lines ) is also plotted for comparison . due to the small numbers , there are large fluctuations in the histograms but there seem to be some differences among the subtypes of de - like galaxies . the most pronounced difference is observed between de and de@xmath2 galaxies . it is due to the narrow range of axis ratio distribution of de@xmath2 galaxies with a lower limit of @xmath121 . approximately 80@xmath122 of de@xmath2 galaxies have axis ratios between @xmath123 and @xmath124 . this siggests that they are mostly dispersion - supported systems but are not as round as dsph galaxies and dispersion - supported de galaxies . the lack of a systematic difference between de and de@xmath43 is consistent with the morphological similarity between the two types of galaxies , except for the presence of blue cores in de@xmath43 galaxies . the axis ratio distribution of dsph galaxies is similar to that of de galaxies but the lower fraction of galaxies with small @xmath26 appears to be real because they are systematically lower than that of de galaxies for a small axis ratio ( @xmath7 ) . the lack of galaxies with a small @xmath26 is consistent with the kinematic observations of dsph galaxies @xcite . the morphology of dwarf elliptical galaxies is characterized by their round appearance and red colors , similar to that of giant elliptical galaxies . on the other hand , there are some differences in the photometric properties between de and giant ellipticals . for example , de galaxies exhibit lower surface brightness and a shallower luminosity gradient than giant elliptical galaxies . the mean luminosity of de galaxies is @xmath125 , which is approximately 3.5 mag fainter than the mean luminosity ( @xmath126 ) of elliptical galaxies listed in the present catalog . @xcite , @xcite , and @xcite argued that these differences result from the structural difference between de and giant ellipticals . therefore , de galaxies can not simply be a small version of giant elliptical galaxies ( kormendy & bender ( 2012 , and references therein ) . the real dwarf counterparts of giant elliptical galaxies are compact elliptical galaxies , exemplified by m32 @xcite . they have sizes comparable to dwarf elliptical galaxies but have a high surface brightness . on the other hand , @xcite and @xcite agrued that the scaling relations of the dwarf elliptical galaxies are continuations of those of giant elliptical galaxies because the nonlinear relations between the absolute magnitude and the effective surface brightness or effective radius are consequences of the two linear relations between the stellar concentration , quantified by the sersic index @xmath44 , and stellar mass or central surface brightness . their structural characteristics are not distinguished from those of giant elliptical galaxies ( graham 2013 , and references therein ) . whether or not de galaxies are distinct populations , they are thought to be a mixture of kinematically heterogeneous populations @xcite , the origins of which are thought to be different @xcite . the three subtypes of de - like galaxies , de@xmath47 , de@xmath46 and de@xmath43 , have similar structure except for the nuclear morphology . normally , the blue cores of de@xmath43 galaxies are larger than the star - like nuclei in de@xmath46 galaxies but in some cases , they appear small . however , we classify them as de@xmath43 galaxy if their colors are blue enough to assume the presence of young stellar populations . the number of de@xmath43 galaxies that have a small core is negligibly small . the global colors of de@xmath43 galaxies are similar to those of de@xmath47 and de@xmath46 galaxies . however , in some cases , their colors appear quite blue close to de@xmath2 galaxies . the well - known examples of de@xmath43 galaxies are ngc 185 @xcite and ngc 205 @xcite , both of which are satellite galaxies of m 31 . the blue cores of de@xmath43 galaxies are thought to be due to recent star formation . different scenarios have been proposed for the origin of the gas in the center of de@xmath43 galaxies . the gas left in the spiral and irregular galaxies which are transformed into de by ram pressure stripping @xcite or galaxy harassment @xcite is widely considered for the origin of the central star formation of de@xmath43 galaxies in cluster environment @xcite . on the other hand , gas accretion from the cosmic web @xcite can be resposible for the isolated de@xmath43 galaxies such as ic 125 @xcite . in addition , it is possible that small cores such as star - like blue nuclei are made from recycled gas from evolved stars @xcite . the morphology of dsph galaxies is similar to that of dwarf elliptical galaxies . they share a round appearance and red color , lower surface brightness , and shallower gradient in the surface brightness than elliptical galaxies . this is why many studies did not distinguish them @xcite . on the other hand , there are some differences in their morphological properties . on average , they are fainter than de galaxies . they have a mean luminosity of @xmath127 , which is @xmath128 mag fainter than the de galaxies . in addition , they differ in their surface brightness distribution . the surface brightness of dsph galaxies is , on average , fainter than that of de galaxies . also , dsph galaxies show a gentler gradient in their surface brightness distribution than de galaxies . the low luminosity and low surface brightness of dsph galaxies are consistent with the relation between the luminosity and surface brightness of a galaxy @xcite . in addition to the difference in surface brightness between dsph galaxies and de galaxies , there are some properties that are quite different . the presence of a blue core is barely observed in the dsph galaxies , whereas a significant fraction of de galaxies have blue cores . some difference in the axis ratio distributions is present , showing smaller fractions of highly flattened dsph galaxies . because axis ratios , i.e. , ellipticities are closely related to the degree of rotational support @xcite , dsph galaxies are believed to be mostly a dispersion - supported system , whereas de galaxies are considered to be partially supported by rotation . this picture of kinematic properties of dsph galaxies is frequently addressed in previous observations @xcite . on the other hand , the distinction of ellipticity distributions between dsph and de is not as clear as that in the fast and slow rotating elliptical galaxies observed in the atlas @xcite due to the fact that the fractions of rotationally supported des and dispersion - supported des are similar @xcite . however , the differences in photometry as well as in kinematics between the dsph and de galaxies suggest that they have different origins . it is quite likely that dsph galaxies are primodial objects formed at @xmath129 @xcite , while de galaxies , at least fast rotating de galaxies , are stripped late type galaxies . the morphological distinction of de@xmath2 galaxies from other dwarf galaxies is one of the most successful uses of color images in morphology classification . while the blue colors of blue elliptical galaxies @xcite , which distinguish them from normal elliptical galaxies , are believed to be due to recent star formation in the core regions , the colors of the de@xmath2 galaxies are due to global star formation that makes their colors much bluer than the dwarf elliptical galaxies . these galaxies have similar colors to those of irregular galaxies . their shapes , however , are quite similar to those of de galaxies although their axis ratio distribution is somewhat different . de@xmath43 are considered to be much different from the de@xmath2 galaxies because de@xmath43 galaxies have red colors outside the blue core . in some aspects , the de@xmath2 galaxies are similar to hii region - like bcds or di . the former shows somewhat bluer colors than de@xmath2 but with a similar shape , and the latter shows a lack of axial symmetry compared to de@xmath2 . the morphology of dwarf lenticular galaxies ( ds0 ) is similar to their giant cousin , lenticular galaxies ( s0 ) , in the sense that they show subtle structure , such as the bulge and disks in s0s . on the other hand , they are significantly different from s0s in many aspects . the morphology of the central excess of light in dwarf lenticular galaxies appears to be lens - like @xcite and much less massive than a bulge . in some cases , the lens component is quite large in size but their luminosity seems to be low . they are likely to have star - like nuclei , which causes them to be classified as ds0@xmath46 , similar to the nucleated dwarf elliptical galaxies , de@xmath46 . their colors are also similar to dwarf ellipticals . in addition , it is quite rare to have bars inside and there appears to be no inner and outer rings in the dwarf lenticular galaxies . the absence of inner and outer rings in dwarf lenticular galaxies is expected if they are stripped , former late - type galaxies . rings are a phenomenon mainly of massive early - type galaxies . they are virtually never seen among extreme late - type spirals or magellanic irregulars @xcite . on the other hand , they are likely to show disrupted features in the outer parts of the galaxies . these features are probably remnants of spiral arms . if this is the case , dwarf spirals can be formed in disks as small as those of dwarf lenticular galaxies but can not survive long due to the lack of sufficient mass to protect them from tidal or hydrodynamic disturbances . compact galaxies are distinguished from others by their high surface brightnesses which are brighter than 20 mag arcsec@xmath27 @xcite . a bcd galaxy has very blue color indicative of a likely starburst . bcds show a range of morphologies in the present catalog . one extreme case is a bcd whose morphology is characterized by a hii region - like appearance , and the other extreme case is characterized by localized compact regions of intense bursts of star formation within a larger irregular galaxy . examples of the two extreme cases are presented in the two rightmost columns of the bottom row in figure 5 . the hii region - like bcds similar to those observed by @xcite who chose their samples mostly from the earlier objective prism surveys . the shape of these galaxies is similar to the small - sized de@xmath2 galaxies but they have deep bluer colors . because there is no clear color distinction between these two types of galaxies , they can be classified as genuine bcds or isolated extragalactic hii regions @xcite . on the other hand , the selection of small - sized de@xmath2 galaxies from the de@xmath2 sample of galaxies is also subjective . the other types of bcds are basically irregular galaxies with localized compact regions of intense star - bursts . the size of the compact regions of extreme star - burst varies from the size of hii regions to the galaxy size . therefore , it is also subjective to set a size - limit when selecting bcds . in the present study , a galaxy is classified as bcd if the size of the compact regions of extreme star burst is larger than @xmath32 of the galaxy size . in order to distinguish the irregular galaxies with small star burst regions , we assign im / bcd as the morphological type of these galaxies . they are amount to @xmath32 of irregular galaxies . the majority of galaxies in the local universe are dwarf galaxies if we consider irregular galaxies fainter than m@xmath130 to be dwarf galaxies , even though we classify them as i m galaxies because of morphologies resembling the late - type spirals . di galaxies show a range of morphologies from very simple shapes to a high degree of complexity . di with a simple morphology resemble de@xmath2 or bcds . the only difference is the degree of roundness . di galaxies with complex morphologies are caused mainly by sites of intense star formation . they are too small to drive the global density waves . star formation in di galaxies is believed to be caused by self - propagating star formation @xcite . interactions with neighboring galaxies makes their morphology rounder and rounder if the interactions occur frequently . the morphology of some di galaxies show a transition type from di to de / dsph or vice versa . the morphology of a galaxy is dependent on its environment . this dependence has been represented by the morphology - density relation since the pioneering work of @xcite . there are a variety of ways to measure the local background density of a galaxy @xcite . recently , @xcite explored the dependence of disk morphology on the local background density derived from the @xmath44th nearest neighbor method with @xmath131 , @xmath132 , which is defined as @xmath133 where @xmath134 is the projected distance to the fifth nearest galaxy brighter than @xmath18 with @xmath135kms@xmath13 . we normalized @xmath132 by the mean local background density ( @xmath136 ) . figure 21 shows the fractional density distribution of local galaxies sorted by the broad morphological types . as shown in figure 21 , the distributions of the local background density of galaxies with different morphology differ greatly . elliptical galaxies are most frequent in the high - density regions , forming a narrow peak at the high - density regions with an extended tail toward the low - density regions , whereas spiral and irregular galaxies show approximately symmetrical distributions with a peak density at log ( @xmath137 . lenticular and de - like galaxies show similar density distributions to that of elliptical galaxies with a slightly larger fraction of galaxies in the low - density regions than elliptical galaxies . it is worth noting that de - like galaxies do not obey the luminosity - density relation @xcite because it dictates that dwarf galaxies which are basically much less luminous than elliptical and lenticular galaxies are located preferentially in the low - density regions . this means that the morphology of a galaxy , particularly a dwarf galaxy , can be affected greatly by other environmental properties . the interactions with large galaxies to which most of dwarf galaxies are bound as satellite galaxies are considered to be the main cause of the secondary parameter affecting the dwarf galaxy morphology . the distance to the nearest neighbor ( @xmath138 ) appears to be a good measure of the galaxy environment because the effect of interactions depends on the separation between the interacting galaxies . to see the dependence of the galaxy morphology on the local background density , the fraction of galaxy morphological types is plotted as a function of the local background density ( figure 22 ) . in general , they follow the morphology - density relation , i.e. , the fractions of early type galaxies ( e , s0 , and des ) increase with increasing local background density , whereas those of late type galaxies ( sp and ir ) decrease with increasing density . although the general pattern of increasing fractions with increasing local background density is the same for the three classes of early type galaxies , there are some differences between them . fractions of the two early type giant galaxies ( e and s0 ) show an almost flat distributions at log ( @xmath139 and gradual increase thereafter , whereas that of the early type dwarf galaxies ( des ) shows a nearly monotonic increase with increasing density with a sudden change of the slope at log ( @xmath140 . irregular galaxies show a nearly opposite trend from that of des at log ( @xmath141 and a somewhat flat distriobution at log ( @xmath142 with a local minimum around log ( @xmath143 . on the other hand , spiral galaxies demonstrate behavior opposite of the general trend for early - type galaxies , that is , an almost monotonically decreasing spiral fraction with increasing local background density . also , there is not much variation in the fractions of hubble stages and bar types of spiral galaxies along the local background density except for an increasing early spiral fraction and a decreasing late spiral fraction with increasing local background density in high - density regions , log ( @xmath144 . to observe the dwarf morphology dependence on the local background density , we plot the distribution of the morphology fractions of dwarf galaxies as a function of the local background density in figure 23 . a clear difference in the morphology distribution can be seen between the two groups of dwarf galaxies . one group of dwarf galaxies ( de , dsph , and ds0 ) shows similar fractions with an increasing trend for the density ranges of log ( @xmath145 and become different fractions at the higher density regions . the other group ( de@xmath43 and de@xmath2 ) shows dominant fractions at local background densities less than the mean local background density . they comprise more than @xmath95 of the des galaxies at log ( @xmath146 , and decrease with increasing density to become the same fractions as those of the former group at log ( @xmath147 . the predominance of de@xmath2 galaxies in the low - density regions seems to reflect the environmental dependence of the star formation rate observed in the local universe , and higher star formation rate in the low - density regions @xcite , in accord with down - sizing @xcite . the high fraction of star forming dwarfs in the low - density regions is due to the dependence of collapse time ( @xmath148 ) of the pre - galactic cloud on the background density ( @xmath149 ) . in the low - density regions , a large amount of gas is left to make dwarf galaxies in the present epoch , including de@xmath2 galaxies . the preference for de@xmath43 galaxies in low - density regions can be understood if late gas accretion is the main cause of the central star formation in the isolaed de@xmath43 galaxies . although the local background density appears to be the primary parameter dictating the morphology of a galaxy , its role is different for giant galaxies and dwarf galaxies . for giant galaxies , it constrains the galaxy morphology through the star formation efficiency , which depends on the dynamical timescales ( @xmath149 ) at the initial collapse phase and the subsequent hierarchical merging phase of galaxy formation . in contrast , for dwarf galaxies , it constrains the interaction rates with giant galaxies . in cases of dwarf galaxies that are bound to giant galaxies as satellites , the interaction rate is inversely proportional to the orbital period that is determined by the dynamical timescales . therefore , de , dsph , and dwarf lenticulars , which are likely to be located in the high - density regions , are supposed to lose their gas quickly due to the frequent interactions with large galaxies . on the other hand , de@xmath2 galaxies have fewer interactions than other de - like galaxies to retain their gas longer . in the case of the de@xmath43 , the role of local background density seems to be complicated . since de@xmath43 are similar to de galaxies except for the blue core , their red color outside the nucleus suggests early removal of gas by frequent interactions with giant galaxies , but there is leftover gas in their environment to accrete the gas removed from des to make blue core . the morphologies of galaxies are affected by the neighboring galaxies . one of the measures of the influence of the neighbor galaxies is the projected distance , @xmath150 . this can be expressed in absolute units such as mpc , but @xmath151 , which is normalized by the neighbor s virial radius , is a good measure of the local environment because the morphology of a galaxy is affected significantly by the neighbor galaxy when it is located within the neighbor s virial radius @xcite . the virial radius of a galaxy is defined as the radius where the mean density inside the radius becomes the virialized density , which is set to 766 @xmath152 @xcite . the virial radius of a galaxy was calculated according to that described in @xcite . we derived @xmath150 of the 5836 local galaxies using the same neighbor search conditions as those applied to derive the local background density . figure 24 shows the frequency distribution of @xmath150 ( mpc ; upper panel ) and the scatter diagram of @xmath151 and @xmath150 ( mpc ) . the frequency distribution in the upper panel shows a very rapid decrease of number of galaxies with increasing @xmath150 . approximately @xmath153 of the local galaxies have a neighbor galaxy within @xmath154mpc and similar fractions of the local galaxies are located inside the virial radius of the nearest neighbor . owing to the rapid decrease of the frequency distribution of @xmath150 , the number of galaxies that have their nearest neighbors at @xmath155mpc is only 204 ( @xmath156 ) and it is reduced to 66 ( @xmath157 ) for @xmath158mpc . a good correlation is observed between @xmath151 and @xmath150 ( mpc ) with an upper envelope of an almost straight line . the scatter is caused by the wide range of virial radii of galaxies . the upper envelope is due to the smallest dwarf galaxies while the lower envelope is due to the largest giant galaxies . because of the small number of large giant galaxies , the lower envelope is not so straight as the upper envelope . figure 25 shows the fractional distributions of the morphological types as a function of @xmath151 . it is apparent that the majority of local galaxies are located within the virial radius of the nearest neighbor . among the morphological types of giant galaxies , the elliptical galaxies are most likely located within the virial radius of the nearest neighbor , whereas more than half of the spiral and irregular galaxies are located outside the neighbor s virial radius . this means that the effects of hydrodynamical interactions with neighboring galaxies are more important in elliptical galaxies because hydrodynamical interactions are likely to be effective when a galaxy is located within the neighbor s virial radius . lenticular galaxies show an intermediate distribution between elliptical galaxies and spiral galaxies . among the de - like galaxies , de , dsph , and ds0 galaxies show fractional distributions similar to that of lenticular galaxies , whereas de@xmath2 galaxies show a more extended tail toward large @xmath151 . more than @xmath159 of de , dsph , and ds0 galaxies are located at @xmath160 . the de@xmath43 galaxies show intermediate distribution between de and de@xmath2 . an examination of the morphology fractions of the 5 broad morphological types as a function of @xmath151 shows similar trends to those observed in figure 22 where the morphological fractions are plotted as a function of the local background density . that is , the three early types ( e , s0 , and des ) show increasing fractions with decreasing @xmath151 and the two late types ( sp and ir ) show the opposite trend . figure 26 shows the early type fractions of the target galaxies as a function of @xmath151 . the early - type fractions of the target galaxies increase with decreasing @xmath151 . however , the increasing rates depend on the neighbor s morphology . here , early type represents three broad types of galaxy , e , s0 , and des , whereas late type represents spiral and irregular galaxies . the early type fractions increase rapidly with decreasing @xmath151 when the neighbor galaxy is the early - type galaxy . whereas early - type fractions increase slowly with decreasing @xmath151 when the neighbor galaxy is a late type . this makes the early - type fraction of the target galaxies with the early - type neighbor larger than @xmath161 when they are located in the neighbor s virial radius , whereas that of the target galaxies with the late type neighbor becomes @xmath162 . this phenomenon was interpreted as morphological conformity between close neighbors @xcite . the gradual increase in the early - type fraction of the target galaxies with late - type neighbor when they come closer to the neighbor suggests that the effect of the tidal interactions dominates other interactions such as hydrodynamical interactions for gas transfer from the late - type neighbor to the target galaxy . in the case of early - type neighbors , hydrodynamical interactions enhance the effect of tidal interactions by removing gas to produce a rapid increase in the early type fraction when they become closer to the neighbor . this paper presents a catalog of the morphological types of 5836 galaxies whose redshifts are less than @xmath19 . the morphological types are determined by a visual inspection of the color images provided by sdss dr7 . the majority of galaxies in the present sample come from the kias - vagc which is based on the spectroscopic target galaxies of the sdss dr7 complemented by the bright galaxies with known redshifts from various catalogs . galaxies fainter than the limiting magnitude of the sdss spectroscopic target galaxies were also included if redshifts are available in the ned . the number of galaxies fainter than @xmath1 is 809 which is approximately @xmath163 of the present sample . therefore , the present sample is not flux - limited but a flux - limited sample can be defined if galaxies brighter than @xmath1 are used because galaxies brighter than the sdss bright limiting magnitude of @xmath164 are believed to be compiled almost completely in the ned . the galaxy morphology classification system adopted for bright galaxies in the present study is basically the de vaucouleurs revised hubble - sandage system of stages and families @xcite . inner and outer ring varieties , lenses and stages of e and s0 galaxies are not recognized in our catalog . for dwarf galaxies , we use notation similar to @xcite , modified to allow for features , such as blue cores or blue colors , that are recognizable in color images . that is , we distinguish subtypes ; de , de@xmath43 , dsph , de@xmath2 , and dwarf lenticulars ( ds0 ) . the de , dsph and ds0 galaxies are further divided into de@xmath47 , de@xmath46 , dsph@xmath47 , dsph@xmath46 , ds0@xmath47 , and ds0@xmath46 to denote the presence of nucleation . in the analysis of the frequency distributions , however , we do not distinguish them because physical properties , such as the color and luminosity are similar , and the numbers of de@xmath47 and dsph@xmath47 galaxies are much smaller than those of de@xmath46 and dsph@xmath46 galaxies . the present catalog contains 85 elliptical galaxies ( e : 1.5% ) , 1093 dwarf elliptical - like galaxies ( des : 18.7% ) , 286 lenticular galaxies ( s0 : 4.9% ) , 1874 spiral galaxies ( sp : 32.1% ) , and 2498 irregular galaxies ( ir : 42.8% ) . since most irregular galaxies are dwarf galaxies , the local universe is dominated by dwarf galaxies . among giant galaxies , spiral galaxies dominate the local universe . the late - type spirals are more frequent than the early - type spirals and @xmath165 of spiral galaxies have bars including weak bars . a significant number of de@xmath2 galaxies , which are generally smaller than the ordinary de galaxies , are included in the present catalog . some de@xmath2 galaxies have large cores that are somewhat bluer than the global colors . most de@xmath2 galaxies without cores are quite compact , similar to hii region - like bcds . the only difference between these two types is the degree of star formation . hii region - like bcds are bluer than de@xmath2 galaxies . a considerable number of di galaxies show somewhat round shapes with size , luminosity , and color similar to de@xmath2 galaxies . their environments , represneted by the local background density , are also similar . therefore , we suppose that de@xmath2 galaxies are the same populations as di galaxies both of which served as the building blocks of giant galaxies . some evidence exists for dichotomy in the morphological properties of de galaxies and dsph galaxies , which is in contrast to the conventional practice to treat them as the same class of galaxies @xcite . the dichotomy is not as clear as that between the giant elliptical galaxies and the de galaxies in terms of size and luminosity . however , they are different in the surface brightness and color . the colors of the de galaxies are similar to those of giant elliptical galaxies , whereas they differ appreciably from dsph galaxies . the surface brightness and surface brightness gradient of dwarf elliptical galaxies are intermediate between the giant elliptical galaxies and dwarf spheroidal galaxies . if we consider the kinematic difference between dsph and de galaxies @xcite , the origins of dsph and de galaxies thought to be different , at least for the disperion - supported ds0 galaxies and the fast rotating de galaxies , dispersion - supported dsph galaxies can be promodial objects @xcite while fast rotating de galaxies are stripped late type spirals @xcite . we explored the physical properties , such as luminosity , color , size , and axial ratios , of the local galaxies . in general , distributions of the physical parameters of galaxies with different morphological types are quite different in terms of the most probable values and the shapes of their distributions . elliptical galaxies show the highest luminosity but their maximum size is smaller than that of spiral galaxies . the larger size of spiral galaxies is supposed to be due to the accretion of the intergalactic material after the collapse phase of galaxy formation . the luminosity and size distributions of the two types of dwarf galaxies , des and dir , are very similar , implying similar masses . the dependence of galaxy size and luminosity on galaxy morphology seems to have originated from the morphology - density relation because the local background density determines the dynamical timescales ( @xmath149 ) , which is closely related to the star formation rates . elliptical and lenticular galaxies that are likely to be formed in dense environment are assumed to build up their bodies rapidly , due to short dynamical times , without a late accretion phase , whereas spiral galaxies build up their outer parts by accreting intergalactic material after the initial collapse phase . this picture of spiral galaxy formation is in good agreement with the inside - out growth picture of spiral galaxies . although the local background density appears to be the primary parameter dictating the morphology of a galaxy , its role is different for giant galaxies and dwarf galaxies . for giant galaxies , the local background density constrains the galaxy morphology through the star formation efficiency in the early phase of galaxy formation . in contrast , the local background density constrains the interaction rates between the host galaxies and their satellites , which are mostly dwarf galaxies because interaction rates are closely related to the orbital period that is determined by the dynamical timescales . therefore , we suppose that des , dsphs , and dwarf lenticulars , which are likely to be observed in the high - density regions , lose their gas quickly due to frequent interactions with large galaxies . on the other hand , de@xmath2 galaxies must have fewer interactions than other dwarf galaxies to keep their gas longer . in the case of the de@xmath43 , the role of local background density is twofold . it is high enough for frequent interactions to remove gas from the galaxy but it allows delayed accretion of gas to the nucleus of the de galaxy to make the blue core . most of the local galaxies have nearby companion galaxies . the mean projected distance to the nearest neighbor @xmath166 is @xmath8kpc , which is similar to the virial radius of a bright spiral galaxy . approximately @xmath167 of the local galaxies have the nearest neighbor within @xmath168 . on the other hand , a considerable number of galaxies are extremely isolated . the number of extremely isolated galaxies depends on the isolation criteria . if @xmath169mpc is taken as the minimum projected separation between a target galaxy and its nearest neighbor , the number of extremely isolated galaxies is 113 but it becomes 66 if we consider @xmath158mpc as the criterion for the extreme isolation . abazajian , k. n. , adelman - mccarthy , j. k. , agueros , m. a. , et al . 2009 , apjs , 182 , 543 abraham , r. g. , valdes , f. , yee , h. k. c. , & van den bergh , sidney , 1994 , , 432 , 75 abraham , r. g. , van den bergh , sidney , & nair , p. 2003 , , 588 , 218 aguerri , j. l. a. , iglesias - paramo , j. , vilchez , j. m. , munoz - tunon , c. , & sanchez - janssen , r. 2005 , , 130 , 475 ann , h. b. , park , c. , & choi , y .- y . 20008 , , 389 , 86 ann , h. b. 2014 , journal of the korean astronomical society , 47 , 1 . barazza , f. d. , jablonka , p. , desai , v. , et al . 2009 , astronomy and astrophysics , 497 , 713 bernardi , m. , sheth , r. k. , annis , j. , et al . 2003 , aj , 125 , 1849 bernardi , m. , meert , a. , vikram , v. , et al . 2014 , , 443 , 874 binggeli , b. , sandage , a. , & tammann , g. a. 1985 , , 90 , 1681 binney , j. 1978 , , 183 , 501 binney , j. , & de vaucouleurs , g. 1981 , , 194 , 679 boselli , a. , boissier , s. , cortese , l. , & gavazzi , g. 2008 , , 674 , 742 buta , r. j. , & combes , f. 1996 , fund . cosmic physics , 17 , 95 buta , r. j. , alpert , a. j. , cobb , m. l. , croker , d. a. , & purcell , g. b. 1998 , , 116 , 1142 buta , r. j. 2013 , planets , stars and stellar systems vol . oswalt , terry d. , & keel , william c. ( new york : springer science+business media dordrecht ) buta , r. j. , corwin , h. g. , odewahn , s. c. , & dejaiffe , r. 2007 , the de vaucouleurs atlas of galaxies ( cambridge : cambridge university press ) buta , r. j. , sheth , k. , athanassoula , e. , et al . 2015 , arxiv:150100454 cheng , j. y. , faber , s. m. , simard , l. , graves , g. j. , lopez , e. d. , yan , r. , & cooper , m. c. 2011 , , 412 , 727 chiboucas , k. , karachentsev , i. d. , & tully , r. b. 2009 , , 137 , 3009 cibinel , a. , carollo , c. m. , lilly , s. j. , et al . 2013 , apj , 776 , 72 choi , y .- y . , han , d .- h . , & kim , s. s. 2010 , journal of the korean astronomical society , , 43 , 191 choi , y .- y . , park , c. , & vogeley , m. s. 2007 , , 658 , 884 colless , m. et al . 2001 , , 328 , 1039 combes , f. 2014 , aspc , 480 , 211 conselice , c. j. 2003 , , 147 , 1 cowie , l. l. , songaila , a. , hu , e. , & cohen , j. g. 1996 , , 112 , 839 de vaucouleurs , g. 1959 , handbuch der physik , volume 53 , p.275 de vaucouleurs , g. , de vaucouleurs , a. , corwin , h. g. , buta , r. j. , paturel , g. , & fouque , p. 1991 , third reference catalogue of bright galaxies ( new york : springer ) disney , m. , davies , j. , & phillipps , s. 1989 , , 239 , 939 dressler , a. 1980 , , 236 , 351 ferguson , h. c. , & binggeli , b. 1994 , astronomy and astrophysics review , 6 , 67 geha , m. , van der marel , r. p. , guhathakurta , p. , gilbert , k. w. , kalirai , j. , & kirby , e. n. 2010 , , 711 , 361 gerola , h. , & seiden , p. e. 1978 , , 223 , 129 gil de paz a. , madore b. f. , & pevunova , o. 2003 , , 147 , 29 gilmore , g. , wilkinson , m. i. , wyse , r. f. g. , kleyna , j. t. , koch , a. , evans , n. w. , & grebel , e. k. 2007 , , 663 , 948 gomez et al . 2003 , , 584 , 210 goto , t. , yamauchi , c. , fujita , y. , okamura , s. , sekiguchi , m. , smail , i. , bernardi , m. , & gomez , p. l. 2003 , , 346 , 601 graham , a. w. , & guzman r , . 2003 , , 125 , 2936 graham , a. w. 2013 , in planets , stars and stellar systems , vol . 6 , p91 - 140 , eds t. d. oswalt & w. c. keel ( springer : berlin ) ( arxiv:1108.0997 ) gu , q. , zhao , y. , shi , l. , peng , z. , & luo , x. 2006 , , 131 , 806 gunn , james e. , & gott , j. richard , iii , 1972 . , 176 , 1 guo , y. , mcintosh , d. h. , mo , h. j. , katz , n. , van den bosch , f. c. , weinberg , m. , weinmann , s. m. , pasquali , a. , yang , x. 2009 , , 398 , 1129 hallenbeck , g. , papastergis , e. , huang , s. , haynes , m. p. , giovanelli , r. , boselli , a. , boissier , s. , heinis , s. , cortese , l. , & fabello , s. 2012 , , 144 , 87 heidmann , j. , heidmann , n. , & de vaucouleurs , g. 1972 , memoirs of the royal astronomical society , 75 , 85 hodge , p. w. 1963 , , 68 , 691 hodge , p. w. 1973 , , 182 , 671 holmberg , e. 1958 , lund medd astron .. obs , ser . ii , 136 , 1 hubble , e. 1926 , , 64 , 321 hubble , e. 1936 , realm of the nebulae ( new haven : yale university press ) huertas - company , m. , rouan , d. , tasca , l. , soucail , g. , & le fevre , o. 2008 , , 478 , 971 jones , h. , davies , j. i. , & trewhella , m. 1996 , , 283 , 316 jerjen , h. , & binggeli , b. 1997 , in asp conf . 116 , the nature of elliptical galaxies ; 2nd stromlo symposium , ed . m. arnaboldi , g. s. da costa , and p. saha ( san francisco , ca : asp ) , 239 karachentsev , i. d. , nasonova , o. g. , & helene m. 2011 , , 743 , 123 karachentsev , i. d. , makarov , d. i. , & kaisina , e. i. 2013 , , 141 , 101 karachentsev , i. d. , & nasonova , o. g. 2013 , , 429 , 2677 karachentsev , i. d. , nasonova , o. g. , & courtois , h. m. 2013 , , 429 , 2264 karachentsev , i. d. , karachentseva , v. e. , & nasonova , o. g. 2014 , astro - ph1406.2467 kelly , brandon c. ; mckay , timothy a. 2004 , , 127 , 625 kim , e. , kim , m. , hwang , n. , lee , m. g. , chun , m .- y . , & ann , h. b. 2011 , , 411 , 1881 kormendy , j. 1985 , , 295 , 73 kormendy , j. , & freeman , k. c. 2014 , 2014arxiv1411.2170k ( arxiv : 1411 2170 ) kormendy , j. , & bender , r. 2012 , 198 , 2 kormendy , j. , fisher , d , b. , cornell , m. e. , & bender , r. 2009 , , 182 , 216 kraan - korteweg , r. c. 1986 , astronomy and astrophysics supplement series , 66 , 255 kraljic , k. , bournaud , f. , & martig , m. 2012 , , 757 , 60 kreckel , k. , peebles , p. j. e. , van gorkom , j. h. , van de weygaert , r. , & van der hulst , j. m. 2011 , , 141 , 204 kunth , d. & ostlin , g. 2000 , the astronomy and astrophysics review , 10 , 1 larson , r. b. 1976 , , 176 , 31 lee , g .- h . , woo , j .- h . , lee , m. g. , hwang , h. s. , lee , j. c. , sohn , j. , & lee , j. h. 2012 , , 750 , 141 lewis , i. et al . 2002 , , 334 , 673 lintott , c. j. , et al . , 2008 , , 389 , 1179 lisker t. , glatt k. , westera p. , & grebel e. k. 2006 , , 132 , 2432 lisker t. , grebel e. k. , binggeli b. , & glatt k. 2007 , , 660 , 1186 lisker , t. 2009 , astronomische nachrichten , 330 , 1043 lisker , t. , weinmann , s. m. , janz , j. , & meyer , h. t. 2013 , , 432 , 1162 lotz , j. m. , primack , j. , & madau , p. 2004 , , 128 , 163 lupton , r. , blanton , m. r. , fekete , g. , hogg , d. w. , omullane , w. , szalay , a. , & wherry , n. 2004 , , 116 , 133 makarov , d. , & karachentsev , i. 2011 , , 412 , 2498 matteucci f. , & francois p. 1989 , , 239 , 885 mcconnachie , a. w. 2012 , , 144 , 4 mcintosh , d. h. et al . 2005 , , 632 , 191 michard , r. , & simien , f. 1993 , 274 , 25 michard , r. 1999 , , 137 , 245 mcintosh , d. t. et al . , 2005 , , 632 , 191 moore b. , katz n. , lake g. , dressler a. , & oemler a. 1996 , nature , 379 , 613 moore b. , lake g. , & katz n. 1998 , , 495 , 139 mould , j. r. , huchra , j. p. , freedman , w. l. , et al . 2000 , apj , 529 , 786 muldrew , s. i. , croton , d. j. , skibba , r. a. , et al . 2012 , mnras , 419 , 2670 nair , p.b . , & abraham , r.g . , 2010 , , 186 , 427 naab , t. , & ostriker , j. p. 2006 , , 366 , 899 oh , s. , oh , k. , & yi , s. k. 2012 , , 198 , 40 pak , m. , rey , s .- c . , lisker , t. , lee , y. , kim , s. , sung , e .- c . , jerjen , h. , chung , j. 2014 , , 445 , 630 park , c. , & choi , y .- y . 2005 , , 635 , l29 park , c. , choi , y .- t . , vogeley , m. c. , gott , j. , r. , & blanton , m. 2007 , , 658 , 898 park , c. , gott , j. , r. , & choi , y .- y . 2008 , , 674 , 784 park , c. , & choi , y .- y . 2009 , , 691 , 1828 2002 , , 332 , 59 peppel , u. c. , drapatz , s. , ghosh , s. k. 1986 , mitteilungen der astronomischen gesellschaft , 67 , 392 roychowdhury , s. , chengalur , j. n. , begum , a. , karachentsev , i. d. 2010 , , 404 , 60 salucci , p. , wilkinson , m. i. , walker , m. g. , gilmore , g. f. , grebel , e. k. , koch , a. , frigerio miatins , c. , & wyse , r. f. g. 2012 , , 420 , 2034 sancisi , r. , fraternali , f. , oosterloo , t. , van der hulst , t. 2008 , the astronomy and astrophysics review , 15 , 189 sandage , a. r. 1961 , the hubble atlas of galaxies ( washington , dc : carnegie institution of washington ) sandage , a. , & bedke , j. 1994 , the carnegie atlas of galaxies ( washington , dc : carnegie institution of washington ) sandage , a. , & binggeli , b. 1984 , , 89 , 919 sandage , a. , & tammann , g. a. 1981 , a revised shapley - ames catalog of bright galaxies ( washington , dc : carnegie inst . ) sargent , w. l. w. , & searle , l. 1970 , , 162 , l155 scarlata , c. , carollo , c. m. , lilly , s. , et al . 2007 , apjs , 172 , 406 strom , s. e. 1980 , apj , 237 , 686 suh , h. , jeong , h. , oh , k. , yi , s. k. , ferreras , i. , & schawinski , k. 2010 , , 187 , 374 tanaka , m. , goto , t. , okamura , s. , shimasaku , k. , brinkmann , j. 2004 , , 128 , 2677 thuan , t. x. , & martin , g. e. 1981 , , 247 , 823 toloba , e. , boselli , a. , peletier , r. f. , falcon - barroso , j. , van de ven , g. , & gorgas , j. 2012 , , 548 , 78 van den bergh , s. 1960 , , 131 , 215 van den bergh , s. 1976 , , 206 , 883 van den bergh , s. 1988 , pasp , 100 , 344 van der hulst , t. , & sancisi , r. 2004 , in iau symp . recycling intergalactic and interstellar matter , ed . m. arnaboldi , g. s. da costa , o. saha ( san fransico , ca : asp ) , 122 walker , m. g .. mateo , m. , olszewski , e. w. , penarrubia , j. , wyn e. n. , gilmore , g. 2009 , , 704 , 1274 walker , m. g. 2013 , planets , stars and stellar systems vol . 5 , 1039 ( new york : springer ) weijmans , , de zeeuw , p. t. , emsellem , e. , et al . 2014 , mnras , 444 , 3340 Abstract:

Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.

Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered . Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video . Paper: in two recent papers @xcite , a new calculation of the phase shift of a matter - wave interferometer caused by the passage of a gravitational wave was presented . this calculation was based not on the usual geodesic equation of motion ( eom ) , but rather on the geodesic _ deviation _ eom . contrary to expectations , these phase shifts have a form that is very much different from those calculated previously in the literature @xcite . while a direct comparison of the various expressions for the phase shift is difficult because of the different configurations of the matter - wave interferometers used for their calculations , it was noted in @xcite that the power - law dependence on the frequency of the gravitational wave , in both the low- and high - frequency limit , of the expressions calculated in @xcite are at times diametrically opposite to those calculated in @xcite . consequently , we expect that the differences between these expressions are _ not _ due simply to differences in the configurations of the interferometers chosen , but are rather caused by fundamental differences in the physics on which their derivations are based . in this paper our objective is to demonstrate that these fundamental differences do exist by presenting a series of calculations that follows the two basic approaches in the literature used to determine the phase shift caused by a gravitational wave . this will be done for the _ same _ configuration of matter - wave interferometer , and will allow us to compare the different expressions we obtain for the phase shift on an equal footing . we then determine their validity by comparing each of them , in the appropriate limit , with the well - known expression for the phase shift caused by _ stationary _ sources of spacetime curvature @xcite . the focus in this paper will be on a _ theoretical _ study of the underlying physics ; we leave issues of the practicality and feasibility of constructing the interferometer to @xcite . the various approaches taken to determine the phase shift of a matter - wave interferometer caused by a gravitational wave can be divided into two distinctly separate classes . the class of approaches that is more often found in the literature @xcite is done in transverse - traceless ( tt ) coordinates ( see sec . 9.2.3 of @xcite ) , either explicitly or implicitly . the tt coordinates are one specific choice of reference frame where the gravitation wave is in the tt gauge . in this frame the number of components of the deviations of the flat spacetime metric @xmath0 caused by the gravitational wave equals the number of physical degrees of freedom of the gravitational wave . consequently , @xmath1 , @xmath2 , and @xmath3 . in addition , the mirrors and the beam splitters are at fixed coordinate values in these coordinates , and they do not move . these coordinates have been used to study the properties of light - wave - interferometry - based detectors of gravitational waves as well @xcite . to calculate the phase shift for matter - wave interferometers , it is combined with either the geodesic eom ( and its action ) , if the calculation is done at the quantum - mechanical level @xcite , or the lagrangian ( and the wkb or stationary phase approximation ) for a quantum field in curved spacetime , if the calculation is done at the quantum field - theoretic level @xcite . not surprisingly , irrespective of the level of sophistication of the approach used , the general expressions calculated for the phase shift have the same final form . the other class of approaches to calculating the phase shift is taken by @xcite , and is done in thorne s `` proper reference frame '' . they follow the classical analysis in @xcite for light - wave - based interferometers . in this frame , the positions and velocities of test particles are measured relative to the worldline of an observer , and follow the motion of the observer in spacetime , in much the same way that the fermi - normal @xcite , fermi - walker coordinates @xcite , and the recently constructed general laboratory frame @xcite do . consequently , the motion of the test particle in this frame is _ not _ described by the usual geodesic equation of motion ( eom ) , but rather by the geodesic _ deviation _ eom ( see eq . ( 2 ) of @xcite ) , which was first applied to the analysis of physical systems in @xcite . as in @xcite , the tt gauge was taken for the gravitational wave . the action ( see @xcite ) for the geodesic deviation eom was then used in conjunction with the quasi - classical approximation of the feynman - path - integral formulation of quantum mechanics . this approximation is the lagrangian form of the wkb approximation in the schrdinger representation of quantum mechanics , and in @xcite it was applied to the calculation of the phase shift of the two matter - wave - interferometer configurations . the phase shift of a matter - wave interferometer is a physically measurable quantity . from the principle of general covariance , it should not matter whether the tt coordinates , or whether the proper reference frame is used in its calculation @xcite . indeed , thorne states the following : _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ `` if @xmath4 then the [ gravitational wave ] detector can be contained entirely in the proper reference frame of its center , and the analysis can be performed using non - relativistic concepts augmented by the quadrupolar gravity - wave force field ( 3 ) , ( 5 ) . if one prefers , of course , one instead can analyze the detector in tt coordinates using general relativistic concepts and the spacetime metric ( 8) . the two analyses are guaranteed to give the same predictions for the detector s performance , _ unless errors are made _ [ emphasis added ] . '' ( from page 400 of @xcite . ) _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ evidently , errors have indeed been made , as we shall see , since the resulting calculations often contradict each other for the same interferometer . the power - law dependence on frequency of the phase shifts calculated in @xcite using tt coordinates are fundamentally different from that of the phase shifts calculated in @xcite using the proper reference frame . since the principle of general covariance must hold , this means that either ( a ) the calculations in @xcite are wrong , ( b ) the calculations in @xcite are wrong , or ( c ) all of the calculations of the phase shifts are wrong . to determine which one of these three possibilities is correct , we will present side by side calculations of the phase shift caused by a gravitational wave for one specific matter - wave - interferometer configuration using the following three approaches . the first calculation uses the quasi - classical approximation in the tt coordinates and geodesic action , and is done at the nonrelativistic , quantum - mechanics level . it follows , as much as possible , the line of analysis given in @xcite . the second calculation is also done at the nonrelativistic , quantum - mechanics level using the same approximation , but now in the proper reference frame , and uses the geodesic _ deviation _ action . it follows the line of analysis given in @xcite . these two calculations would seem to exhaust the two different classes of approaches currently found in the literature . that a third calculation of the phase shift is needed is because of an error in @xcite . either because changes in the kinetic energy term in the action for the atom in @xcite were neglected , or because the turning points of the atom s phase at the interferometer s mirrors in the wkb - type of approach in @xcite were omitted , the end result is that important boundary terms are not included in the final expression for the phase shift in @xcite . for the sake of completeness , and to compare the calculations in @xcite with these previous calculations in the literature , this necessitates a _ third _ calculation of the phase shift , which will result in yet another expression for the phase shift based on the geodesic eom . we find that all three expressions for the phase shift calculated here are different from one another . although there are currently no _ direct _ experimental checks that can used to determine which one of these three expressions for the phase shift is correct , an _ indirect _ experimental check can be used by taking the low - frequency limit . all three expressions for the phase shift depend on the transit time of the atom through the interferometer , and the period of the gravitational wave . if the transit time of the atom is much shorter than the period , then , with respect to the atom , the gravitational wave does not oscillate appreciably as it traverses the interferometer . the gravitational wave will contribute a local riemannian curvature to the spacetime that is effectively static . the phase shift of matter - interferometers caused by static ( as well as stationary ) sources of curvature is well established @xcite , and has been shown to be proportional to components of the riemann curvature tensor . just as importantly , this phase shift can be calculated using only newtonian gravity [ eq . ( 2.6 ) of @xcite ] . the phase shift due to the newtonian gravitational potentialthrough the acceleration due to earth s gravity @xmath5has been measured , first by collela , overhauser and werner @xcite , and more recently by chu and kasevich @xcite . these more recent measurements of the phase shift induced by @xmath5 are sensitive enough that effect of _ spatial variations _ in @xmath5which are proportional to the static riemann curvature of the spacetime caused by the earthon the phase shift can be discerned . gradients in @xmath5 were seen through _ changes _ in the phase shift of an atomic fountain when its vertical position was varied @xcite . more recently , they were seen through a differential measurement of the phase shifts of two atomic fountain matter - wave interferometers operating in tandem @xcite . therefore , while the direct measurement of the phase shift of a matter - wave interferometer caused by a static riemann curvature tensor has not been made , its discovery is expected . indeed , indications are that the phase shift induced by the static riemann curvature of the earth has already been seen @xcite . as a consequence of the above , in the limit of low - frequency gravitational waves the phase shift calculated for the matter - wave interferometer _ must _ approach the well - known static result , and be proportional to the curvature tensor . we will see that in this limit , only the phase shift calculated along the lines of @xcite has the correct form . the other two do not , and _ must be wrong _ , since they do not yield the correct static limit . our focus here is on the phase shift that a _ gravitational wave _ will induce on a matter - wave interferometer . we will thus neglect the effects of all other gravitational effectssuch as the acceleration due to earth s gravity , and the local curvature of spacetime due to _ stationary _ sources such as the earth , sun and moonin addition to the phase shift due to the sagnac effect caused by the earth s rotation . we have shown in @xcite that for these types of stationary gravitational effects the description of the motion of test particles in the general laboratory frameof which the proper reference frame is a special casereduces to the usual geodesic eom description , and there is no controversy . the phase shifts caused by these stationary effects calculated in either the proper reference frame or the tt coordinates will be the same . we will in this paper use the same notation the is commonly found in the literature @xcite . in particular , it follows the notation in @xcite . while this has the benefit of consistency and simplicity , it means that we do not separate with notation the coordinates used for the tt coordinates from the coordinate used for the proper reference frame . the coordinates used in the two reference frames have different physical meanings , which we will make clear in the next section . these differences are outlined in detail in @xcite . in this section we will present two of the three calculations of the phase shift mentioned in the introduction . the first calculation will be done in the tt coordinates , and will be based on the geodesic eom . the second calculation will be done in the proper reference frame , and will be based on the geodesic deviation eom . a third calculation , following the approach in the literature , will be done in the next section where comparisons between the different results of the calculations are made . all three calculations are done for gravitational waves in the long - wavelength limit for the matter - wave interferometer configuration shown in fig . @xmath6 ; this configuration is described in detail in * appendix a*. to calculate the phase shifts , we will use the quasi - classical approximation of the feynman path integral representation of quantum mechanics . this approximation is the lagrangian version of the wkb approximation , or stationary phase approximation , in the schrdinger representation of quantum mechanics , and will be reviewed in * appendix a * as well . the presentation in this section is done in detail to ensure that all the underlying assumptions , approximations , and subtleties in our analysis are readily apparent . consider a gravitational wave in the long - wavelength limit with an amplitude @xmath7 incident perpendicularly to the plane of the interferometer in fig . @xmath6 . as usual , greek indices run from @xmath8 to @xmath9 , and latin indices run from @xmath10 to @xmath11 . the gravitational wave is represented by the tensor @xmath0 as a perturbation on the flat spacetime metric @xmath12 , so that the total metric of the spacetime is @xmath13 . we have chosen the signature of @xmath14 to be @xmath15 . in the tt - gauge , a coordinate system is chosen so that in these coordinates , @xmath16 , @xmath17 , and @xmath3 ; the only nonvanishing components of @xmath0 are thus @xmath18 . one choice of coordinates where the tt gauge is realized is the tt coordinates ( see @xcite and the general analysis in @xcite ) . in these coordinates the action for the atom with mass @xmath19 used in fig . @xmath6 is the usual geodesic action in the nonrelativistic limit , @xmath20dt , \label{geoaction}\ ] ] where the subscript `` geo '' stands for `` geodesic '' . since the rest mass @xmath21 only shifts the lagrangian for the atom by a constant , we drop this term from @xmath22 . the nonrelativistic hamiltonian for the motion is then , @xmath23 which results in the usual geodesic equation of motion @xmath24 here @xmath25 is christoffel symbol for the spacetime ; for gravitational waves in the tt gauge , @xmath26 . to calculate the phase shift of fig . @xmath6 , we follow the description in * appendix a * , and consider the phase shift due to the @xmath27th atom emitted from the atomic source , which at a time @xmath28 is diffracted by the initial beam splitter . there are two possible classical paths for the atom through the interferometer . in the absence of gravitational waves , these are straight - line paths @xmath29 ( see * appendix a * ) , which will be shifted when a gravitational wave is present . these shifts are expected to be very small , however , and we can use perturbation theory to solve for them . we thus take @xmath30 , and @xmath31 , where @xmath32 and @xmath33 are perturbations to the atom s path @xmath29 and velocity @xmath34 , respectively ; we will keep only terms linear in @xmath33 . to first order in @xmath18 , eq . @xmath35 becomes @xmath36 once @xmath29 is determined , @xmath37 is solved for by dividing the trajectory of an atom into two parts : from the initial beam splitter to the mirror , and then from the mirror to the final beam splitter . the two paths are then joined with the appropriate boundary conditions at the mirror . we begin by determining @xmath29 . to determine the unperturbed path of the atoms through the interferometerwhich is the same no matter which approach is used to calculate the phase shiftsconsider first the path of the atom that is diffracted into the @xmath38 diffraction order . we will assume that the velocity of the atoms is high enough that we can ignore the effect of earth s gravity on the atom . it is then clear that for @xmath39during which it travels between the initial beam splitter and the first mirror in a time @xmath40the path of the atom is @xmath41 where @xmath42 and @xmath43 are @xmath44 and @xmath45 components of the velocity of the atom immediately after it leaves the initial beam splitter . at @xmath46 the atom is reflected off the hard - wall mirror , and from the general expression of the boundary condition for the atom at the mirror eq . @xmath47 , @xmath48 , while @xmath49 . ( the superscripts @xmath50 denote @xmath51 respectively . ) for the subsequent time interval @xmath52 , the atom s path is @xmath53 during which it travels between the mirror and the final beam splitter . it is clear that @xmath54 and @xmath55 , and @xmath56 is the total transit time of the atom through the interferometer . the unperturbed path for the atom in the @xmath57 diffraction order is similar to eqs . @xmath58 and @xmath59 , and is obtained by taking @xmath60 and @xmath61 . to determine the boundary conditions for @xmath62 in eq . @xmath63 , we note that from eq . @xmath35 the acceleration of a test particle for the geodesic eom is proportional to its velocity . as such , a test particle which was initially at rest will stay at rest , _ even in the presence of a gravitational wave_. this led to the following conclusion by stodolsky : _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ `` in this discussion [ of matter - wave interferometry ] we have assumed that the parts of the apparatus [ interferometer ] stay at fixed coordinate values . this can be achieved if these parts are free masses , since a metric of the gravity wave type ( with no `` 0 '' components ) does not affect the positions of nonmoving bodies . '' ( from page 399 of @xcite . ) _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ thus , in the tt coordinates , the positions of beam splitters and the mirrors do not change when a gravitational wave passes through the system . the velocity of the atoms travelling between the supersonic source and the initial beam splitter , on the other hand , _ will _ be affected by the gravitational wave . since the interferometer in fig . @xmath6 is _ balanced _ , only _ differences _ in the atom s trajectory along the two paths through it will matter . we can thus neglect any shifts in the atom s velocity _ before _ it reaches the beam splitter . and , since the initial beam splitter is not moved by the gravitational wave , @xmath64 while @xmath65 ; thus we take @xmath66 . for the boundary conditions at the mirror , we note that like the beam splitter , the positions of the mirrors in the interferometer also do not change when a gravitational wave is present . thus the boundary conditions for @xmath33 across the hard - wall mirrors is @xmath67 integrating eq . @xmath63 is now straightforward , and for @xmath39 , @xmath68 while for @xmath52 , @xmath69 we now calculate the action for the @xmath27th atom as it travels through along the upper path through the interferometer . to first order in @xmath18 , @xmath70 & \equiv & \frac{1}{2}m\int_{t_r}^{t_r+t } \left\{[\vec{v}_0(t)+\vec{v}_1(t)]^2 + v_0^iv_0^jh_{ij}\right\ } dt , \nonumber \\ & \approx & \frac{1}{2}m\int_{t_r}^{t_r+t } \vec{v}_0^{\>2}\ > dt + m\int_{t_r}^{t_r+t}\left\{\vec{v}_0\cdot\vec{v}_1(t ) + \frac{1}{2}v_0^iv_0^jh_{ij}\right\}dt , \label{actiongeo}\end{aligned}\ ] ] where the superscript `` cl '' stands for `` classical '' , and denotes that the integration is over a classical path through the interferometer . the @xmath71 term in eq . @xmath72 is the same for both paths through the interferometer , and will not contribute to the phase shift . it can be neglected . the last term @xmath73 can be trivially integrated using eqs . @xmath58 and @xmath59 , while the @xmath74 term can be integrated using eqs . @xmath75 and @xmath76 . we then get @xmath77 = & t\left[v_\|^2h_{xx}(t_r)+v_\bot^2h_{yy}(t_r)\right ] \nonumber \\ & - \frac{1}{2}\int_{t_r}^{t_r+t } \bigg[v_\|^2h_{xx}(t)+v_\bot^2h_{yy}(t)\bigg]dt \nonumber \\ & + 2 v_\bot v_\|t\bigg[h_{xy}(t_r ) -h_{xy}(t_r+t/2)\bigg ] \nonumber \\ & - v_\bot v_\|\left(\int_{t_r}^{t_r+t/2 } h_{xy}(t)\>dt - \int_{t_r+t/2}^{t_r+t } h_{xy}(t)\ > dt \right ) , \label{actiongeofinal}\end{aligned}\ ] ] where the tilde denotes the fact that we have dropped the @xmath78 term from the action . we get the action @xmath79 $ ] for the atom if it took the lower path through the interferometer by taking @xmath60 in @xmath80 $ ] . the first two terms in eq . @xmath81 do not change , while the last two terms flip sign . thus , from eq . @xmath82 , the phase shift of the atom is @xmath83 \nonumber \\ & + \frac{1}{t^2 } \left(\int_{t_r}^{t_r+t/2 } h_{xy}(t)\>dt - \int_{t_r+t/2}^{t_r+t } h_{xy}(t)\>dt \right)\bigg\}. \label{phasegeo}\end{aligned}\ ] ] after taking the fourier transform , @xmath84 the calculated phase shift for fig . @xmath6 using tt coordinates simplifies to @xmath85 ^ 2 - 4e^{i\omega t/4 } \hbox{sinc}\,(\omega t/4 ) , \label{phasegeores}\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath86 . the first result of our comparison of phase - shift calculations for the interferometer shown in fig . @xmath6 is given in eq . the derivation of these equations is based on the geodesic equation of motion using the tt coordinates . we will find that the phase shift calculated in all three approaches in this paper will have this same overall form , and will differ only in the resonance function @xmath88 . reference frames centered on the worldline of an observer , such as the proper reference frame and general laboratory frame , are less commonly used than the tt coordinates used in the previous subsection . we therefore begin the calculation of the phase shift for fig . @xmath6 in the proper reference frame with a brief review of this frame . how the proper reference frame is constructed is described as follows : _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ `` consider an observer ( freely falling or accelerated , it does nt matter so long as the acceleration is slowly varying ) . let the observer carry with herself a small cartesian latticework of measuring rods and synchronized clocks ( a ` proper reference frame ' in the sense of sec . 13.6 of mtw , with spatial coordinates @xmath89 that measure proper distance along orthogonal axes ) . '' ( from page 339 of @xcite . ) _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ in this frame the coordinate @xmath90 is the position of a nonrelativistic test particle travelling along its worldline _ relative _ to the worldline of the observer at her propertime @xmath91 . the magnitude of @xmath90 is then the distance between the worldline of the test particle , and the worldline of the observer at the same instant of time @xmath91 . this frame is only valid when the test particle is moving nonrelativistically , and the size of the apparatus is small compared to the wavelength of the gravitational wave . the velocity @xmath92 is then the velocity of the test particle measured _ relative _ to the observer . in the absence of all other forces , both the test particle and the observer travel along geodesics in the spacetime , and thus their motion are each , separately , governed by geodesic eoms . by subtracting the geodesic eom of the observer from that of the test particle , and then expanding the resultant to first order in @xmath90 , the motion of the test particle _ as seen by the observer _ is governed by @xmath93 this is the geodesic _ deviation _ eom , and it holds as long as the local riemann curvature tensor of the spacetime @xmath94 varies so slowly with @xmath95 that it can be approximated as a constant . this condition holds in the long - wavelength limit of the gravitational wave . as observed in @xcite for ligo ( the _ _ l__aser _ _ i__nterferometer _ _ g__ravitational - wave _ _ o__bservatory ) , if the characteristic size of the interferometer @xmath96 is much smaller than the reduced wavelength @xmath97 of the gravitational wave the interferometer is contained entirely within the proper reference frame . one does not need to use tt coordinates . like ligo , the characteristic size of the interferometers considered in @xcite is also smaller than the reduced wavelength of the gravitational wave @xcite , and thus the use of the proper reference frame was also valid . we shall assume that this is true for the interferometer shown in fig . @xmath6 as well . we will also follow thorne @xcite , and take @xmath98 . this relation between @xmath94 and @xmath99 holds only when the `` tt gauge '' is taken . because of the naturalness of its construction , it should be expected that the tt gaugewhere the number of independent components of @xmath18 equals the number of degrees of freedom for the gravitational wavecan be taken for the proper reference frame as well as for the tt coordinates , but this has not been shown explicitly in the literature @xcite . as we shall see in * appendix b * , this can be done explicitly in the general laboratory frame . it can thus be done in the proper reference frame since it was shown in @xcite that the general laboratory frame reduces to the proper reference frame in the long - wavelength limit for the gravitational waves . for our calculation of the phase shift in the proper reference frame using the geodesic deviation eom , the observer is fixed on the initial beam splitter , and the motion of all objects , and thus the phase shift , is measured with respect to it ( see fig . @xmath6 ) . in this reference frame , the action for a test particle is ( see @xcite or @xcite for a derivation ) @xmath100 where the subscript `` gd '' stands for `` geodesic deviation '' , and we have dropped the @xmath101 term . as in eq . ( 4 ) of @xcite , we have taken the gravitational wave to be in the tt gauge in eq . the resulting hamiltonian ( see also @xcite ) in this case is @xmath103 to lowest order in @xmath18 . it is straightforward to see from eq . @xmath102 that the eom for the test particle is the geodesic _ deviation _ equation eq . we once again solve perturbatively for the classical trajectories , which are determined now by eq . @xmath104 , and take @xmath105 . _ unlike _ the geodesic eom [ eq . @xmath35 ] , in the geodesic _ deviation _ eom [ eq . @xmath104 ] the acceleration depends on the _ position _ of the test particle , and _ not _ on its velocity . consequently , when a gravitational wave passes through the system , it shifts the position of _ all _ parts of the interferometer _ except _ the initial beam splitter , where @xmath108 due to our choice of origin . we can thus take @xmath109 as an initial condition for @xmath33 once again . in addition , from the force lines drawn in fig . @xmath6 we see by symmetry that it is the @xmath110 polarization that contributes to the phase shift , and not the @xmath111 polarization . for this polarization , the motion induced on the final beam splitter by the gravitational wave also does not affect the overall phase shift . while the motion of the final beam splitter does not affect the phase shift of the atoms , the motion of the mirrors in response to the gravitational wave will . this motion changes the boundary condition for the atom at the mirrors from the simple expression eq . @xmath47 . let @xmath112 denote the position of the mirror placed in the upper path of the interferometer , and let @xmath113 denote its velocity . in absence of the gravitational wave the mirrors do not move , and we can take @xmath114 and @xmath115 , where @xmath116 are fluctuations in the positions of the mirror due to the gravitational wave . because of these fluctuations , the boundary condition eq . @xmath117 for @xmath118 at the mirror now becomes @xmath119 where @xmath120 . to determine the response @xmath121 of the mirror to the gravitational wave , we follow @xcite , and model the mirror , and its connection to the frame of the interferometer , as a spring with a quality factor @xmath122 and resonance frequency @xmath123 ( see also section 37.6 of @xcite ) this frequency depends on the size of the interferometer as well as its material properties . from the equivalence principle , the motion @xmath124 of the mirror , like that of the atom , is also a solution of eq . @xmath104 , but because the mirrors are connected to damped springs , @xmath125 the action for the atom along the upper path through the interferometer in the proper reference frame is @xmath126;\gamma_{+1 } ) & \equiv & \frac{1}{2}m\int_{t_r}^{t_r+t } \left\{[\vec{v}_0(t)+\vec{v}_1(t)]^2 - v_0^ix_0^j\dot{h}_{ij}\right\}\>dt \nonumber \\ & \approx & \frac{1}{2}m\int_{t_r}^{t_r+t } \vec{v}_0 ^ 2\ > dt + m\int_{t_r}^{t_r+t } \left\{v_{1i } - \frac{1}{2}x_0^j\dot{h}_{ij}\right\}\frac{dx_{0}^i}{dt}\>dt , \label{actiongeodev}\end{aligned}\ ] ] where once again `` cl '' stands for `` classical '' . the @xmath71 term is once again the same for both paths through the interferometer , and can be neglected . performing an integration by parts , and using eq . @xmath104 , we get @xmath127 = & x_0^i(t)\left(v_{1i}(t)-\frac{1}{2 } x_0^j(t ) \dot{h}_{ij}(t)\right ) \big\vert_{t_r}^{t_r+t/2 } \nonumber \\ & + x_0^i(t)\left(v_{1i}(t)-\frac{1}{2 } x_0^j(t ) \dot{h}_{ij}(t)\right)\big\vert_{t_r+t/2}^{t_r+t } \nonumber \\ & + \frac{1}{2}\int_{t_r}^{t_r+t/2}x_0^iv_0^j \dot{h}_{ij}\>dt+ \frac{1}{2}\int_{t_r+t}^{t_r+t } x_0^iv_0^j \dot{h}_{ij}\>dt . \label{actiongeodev2}\end{aligned}\ ] ] we integrate by parts once again , and then use eqs . @xmath58 , and @xmath59 to get @xmath127 = & l_\|\left\ { v_{1x}(t_r+t ) -\frac{1}{2 } l_\| \dot{h}_{xx}(t_r+t)\right\ } \nonumber \\ & + \frac{1}{2}l_\bot\left\{v_{1y}(t_r+t^{-}/2)-v_{1y}(t_r+t^{+}/2)\right\ } \nonumber \\ & + \frac{1}{2}x_0^i(t ) v_0^j(t ) h_{ij}(t)\bigg\vert_{t_r}^{t_r+t/2 } + \frac{1}{2}x_0^i(t ) v_0^j(t ) h_{ij}(t)\bigg\vert_{t_r+t/2}^{t_r+t } \nonumber \\ & - \frac{1}{2}\int_{t_r}^{t_r+t}v_0^iv_0^j \dot{h}_{ij}\>dt . \label{actiongeodev3}\end{aligned}\ ] ] obtaining @xmath128 $ ] the usual way from @xmath129 $ ] , we arrive at @xmath130 + l_\bot\left[v_{1y}^{(+1)}(t_r+t^{-}/2 ) + v_{1y}^{(-1)}(t_r+t^{-}/2 ) \right ] \nonumber \\ & - \frac{1}{2}l_\bot\left[v_{1y}^{(+1)}(t_r+t/2 ) + v_{1y}^{(-1)}(t_r+t/2 ) \right ] \nonumber \\ & - 2v_\| v_\bot \left(\int_{t_r}^{t_r+t/2 } h_{xy}(t)\>dt - \int_{t_r+t/2}^{t_r+t } h_{xy}(t)\ > dt \right)\bigg\ } , \label{gdphase1}\end{aligned}\ ] ] where we have used the boundary condition eq . the superscripts @xmath132 denote whether it is the velocity of the atom or mirror along the top [ represented by the superscript ( @xmath133 ) ] or the bottom [ represented by the superscript @xmath134 path through the interferometer . we note that to lowest order in @xmath18 eq . @xmath104 becomes @xmath135 we then take the component of eq . @xmath136 along the @xmath44 direction for an atom travelling along the lower path , and subtract it from the same equation for the atom travelling along the upper path . since @xmath137 , while @xmath138 , we integrate and find @xmath139 similarly , if we take the sum of these equations along the @xmath45 direction , we get @xmath140 consequently , @xmath141 \nonumber \\ & - \frac{1}{4}\dot{h}_{xy}(t_r+t/2)+ \frac{h_{xy}(t_r+t/2 ) - h_{xy}(t_r)}{t } \nonumber \\ & + \frac{1}{t^2 } \left(\int_{t_r}^{t_r+t/2 } h_{xy}(t)\>dt - \int_{t_r+t/2}^{t_r+t } h_{xy}(t)\>dt\right)\bigg\}. \label{gdphase2}\end{aligned}\ ] ] using eq . @xmath142 and the steady - state solution for eq . @xmath143 , then @xmath144 and we find that @xmath145 ^ 2 - \frac{1}{2 } \frac{\omega^2}{\omega^2-\omega_0 ^ 2 + i\omega\omega_0/q}. \label{f - gd}\end{aligned}\ ] ] the second result of our comparison of phase - shift calculations for the interferometer shown in fig . @xmath6 is given in eq . @xmath146 . the derivation of these equations is based on the geodesic deviation equation of motion using the proper reference frame . the phase has precisely the same form as eq . @xmath87 ; only the resonance function @xmath147 has changed . .a comparison between the geodesic eom and the geodesic deviation eom descriptions of test - particle dynamics , and the phase shifts calculated for fig . @xmath6 using the two eoms . [ cols="^,^,^",options="header " , ] a summary of the geodesic- and geodesic - deviation - based eom approaches to the description of the motion of test particles in the presence of a gravitational wave , along with the resonance functions for the phase shifts calculated with both approaches , is listed in table @xmath148 . it is readily apparent from the form of @xmath88 and @xmath147 that the corresponding phase shifts @xmath149 and @xmath150 _ do not agree with each other _ even if the lorentzian term in @xmath147 is neglected . moreover , as we will see in the next section , both phase shifts are different from the phase shift calculated previously in the literature as well . there are thus _ three _ different expressions for the phase shift for the _ same _ matter - wave interferometer . to determine the correct expression , we consider the low - frequency limit of these expressions , and compare their limiting forms to the phase shift of caused by a static riemann curvature tensor . the motion of test particles in _ stationary _ spacetimes has been well studied experimentally both directly , through measurements of the advance of the perihelion of mercury , the deflection of light , and the gravitational redshift @xcite in the weak gravity limit , and indirectly , through the slow - down of the taylor - hulse pulsar @xcite in the strong gravity limit . it has also been well studied theoretically through analyses of various black hole geometries @xcite . the motion of test particles in _ nonstationary _ spacetimes , such as when a gravitational wave is present , has not been established to the same level of certainty . on an experimental level , until ligo has detected a gravitational wave , there will have been no _ direct _ measurements of the motion of test particles in nonstationary spacetimes . on a theoretical level , while it would _ seem _ that the motion of test particles in nonstationary spacetimes has been well studied , a recent analysis @xcite based on the general laboratory frame has detailed differences in the dynamics of test particles in nonstationary versus stationary spacetimes . there is , however , is no disagreementon either on a theoretical or an experimental levelover the motion of text particles in _ stationary _ spacetimes . indeed , it was explicitly demonstrated that in this case the general laboratory frame @xcite ( and thus the proper reference frame ) goes over to the standard description of the motion of test particles in stationary spacetimes using the geodesic eom . the phase shift @xmath151 of a matter - wave interferometer due to a _ static _ curvature is well known , and can be written as @xmath152 , where @xmath153 is the area of the interferometer , @xmath56 is the transit time of the atom through the interferometer , and @xmath154 are the components of the static riemann curvature tensor in the plane of the interferometer ( see @xcite , eq . @xmath155 of @xcite , and eq . ( 2.23 ) of @xcite ) . while the calculation of the calculation of @xmath151 in @xcite and @xcite was based on general relativity , @xmath151 can be derived using only newtonian gravitywhere the static curvature is formed from gradients of @xmath5as was done in @xcite . newtonian gravity has been experimentally verified , of course , and the effect of @xmath5 on the phase shift of massive particles in matter - wave interferometers is well known for neutrons @xcite , and for atoms @xcite . the effect of the static riemann curvature of the earth has also been seen in measurements of the _ gradients _ in @xmath5 using differential measurements of the phase shift caused by @xmath5 at differing heights @xcite . while indirect , these all serve as experimental indications that @xmath151 holds . indeed , there are indications that the phase shift induced by the static riemann curvature of the earth has already been seen @xcite . consider now the limit where the period of a gravitational wave is very long compared to the transit time of the atom through the interferometer . the gravitational wave does not oscillate appreciably in the time it takes for the atom to traverse the interferometer , and to the atom , the curvature of the spacetime caused by the gravitational wave is effectively a static one . correspondingly , the phase shift induced by the gravitational wave should have the same form as the phase shift induced by a static riemann curvature . this correspondence between the gravitational wave - induced , and the static - curvature - induced phase shifts serves as a check of our results . when it is combined with the experimental results @xcite , we conclude that the _ correct _ phase shift must have a low - frequency limit that has the same _ form _ as @xmath151 . unlike @xmath88 , which depends only on the transit time @xmath56 of the atoms through the interferometer , and the period @xmath156 of the gravitational wave , @xmath147 depends on the period @xmath157 of the resonance frequency of the mirror - interferometer assembly as well . both @xmath56 and @xmath158 are fixed by the design of the interferometer , while @xmath159 can , in principle , take a broad range of values . we note , however , that the resonance frequency of the interferometer can be estimated as @xmath160 , where @xmath161 is the speed of sound of the material used to construct the interferometer . in almost all cases , @xmath162 , and since @xmath163 , @xmath164 . if the transit time of the atom is much shorter than the period of the gravitational wave so that @xmath165 , then @xmath166 as well . in this low - frequency limit , the gravitational wave will not oscillate in the time it takes the atom to traverse the interferometer , nor will the mirrors oscillate appreciably during this time . this , then , corresponds to the static - limit conditions considered above . from eq . @xmath87 , we see that in this low - frequency limit where @xmath167 , @xmath168 . then @xmath169 since @xmath170 . thus , @xmath171 is proportional to the fourier transform of the _ christoffel symbols _ for the gravitational wave in the low frequency limit , and _ not _ the riemann curvature tensor . it thus has an incorrect limiting form . if we now take the low - frequency limit of eq . @xmath146 , we find that @xmath172 to lowest order , so that @xmath173 since @xmath174 . thus , unlike @xmath171 , @xmath175 _ is _ proportional to the riemann curvature tensor , and _ has the correct limiting form_. the differences in the low - frequency behavior of @xmath149 and @xmath150 are shown fig . @xmath176 , where we have graphed @xmath177 versus @xmath159 for both expressions of the phase shift . for completeness , we have also included in this comparison the phase shift @xmath178 for the matter - wave interferometer fig . @xmath6 calculated using the linet - tourenc - stodolsky formula @xcite . as we mentioned in the introduction , a third calculation of the phase shift of fig . @xmath6 based also on the geodesic eom is necessary , and in the next section this phase shift @xmath178 is explicitly calculated for our interferometer using the liner - tourrenc - stodolsky formula . for now , we note that the graphs in fig . @xmath176 were plotted using the parameters of the `` earth - base horizontal migo '' described @xcite , which has the same configuration as the interferometer we consider here in fig . this interferometer has a @xmath179 m , @xmath180 km , @xmath181 s , @xmath182 , @xmath183 rad / s , and used @xmath184li with @xmath185 gm . the plots in fig . @xmath176 cover the same frequency range considered in @xcite . notice that for frequencies much less than @xmath186 rad / s , @xmath187 approaches a constant , indicating that @xmath188 for low frequencies , as expected , while both @xmath189 , and @xmath190 do not . the behavior of all three phase shifts also differ dramatically at high frequencies . we will consider the high - frequency behavior of @xmath150 in * appendix c*. versus @xmath159 for @xmath150 , @xmath149 , and @xmath178 , for the interferometer fig . @xmath6 using @xmath179 m , @xmath180 km , @xmath181 s , @xmath182 , @xmath191 rad / s , and used @xmath184li with @xmath192 gm . , scaledwidth=100.0% ] we now compare results of the above calculations with those done previously in the literature . calculations of the phase shift by linet and tourrenc @xcite , and stodolsky @xcite were both done at the quantum - mechanical level , but unlike us , they presented a completely general analysis , and did not take the nonrelativistic limit for the interfering particles they considered . their expressions for the phase shift were thus manifestly covariant . linet and tourrenc did not explicitly define the coordinate system that they used , while stodolsky only referred to the presentation by landau and lifschitz @xcite on synchronous reference frames . it is clear that since a gravitational wave in the tt gauge has @xmath17 , the tt coordinates is a synchronous reference frame as well . since both calculations were ultimately based on the action for the _ geodesic _ eom , they were implicitly done in the tt coordinates . linet and tourrenc used the wkb approximation in the quasi - classical limit , and replaced the mass - shall constraint @xmath193 ( note that the signature of their metric is different from ours ) with a differential equation in the phase of the wavefunction for the test particle by making the substitution @xmath194 . stodolsky worked directly with the action , and used the quasi - classical approximation we followed here to calculate the phase shift . the expression for the phase shift derived by both nevertheless have the same overall form . the phase shift ( given in eq . [ 3.2.3 ] of @xcite ) derived by linet and tourrenc does , however , differ from the original phase shift ( given in eq . ( 2.4 ) of @xcite ) derived by stodolsky by a factor of 2 . since stodolsky uses the linet and tourrenc phase shift expression ( the equation above eq . ( 6.1 ) of @xcite ) to calculate the phase shift for a model interferometer , we will do so also . in the nonrelativistic limit of the atoms that we are interested in , this phase shift reduces to @xmath195 which is different from @xmath149 , even though both were calculated in tt coordinates . to understand the origin of the difference between @xmath178 and @xmath149 , let us write @xmath196 , where @xmath197 and the superscript `` kin '' stands for `` kinetic '' , while the superscript `` pot''stands for `` potential '' . clearly , @xmath198 . since @xmath199 , contributions to the total phase shift @xmath200 from changes to the kinetic energy of the test particle as it traverses the interferometer was not taken into account in eq . this kinetic term can not be neglected , however . the passage of the gravitational wave through the system will cause shifts in the velocity of the atom as it traverses the interferometer , and thus to its kinetic energy . in fact , by using eqs . @xmath75 and @xmath76 , it is straightforward to show that @xmath202 , where @xmath203 are boundary terms for the atoms at the mirrors . these terms do not vanish , but instead contribute the @xmath204 term to @xmath88 . if we nonetheless use @xmath178 to calculate the phase shift for fig . @xmath6 , we once again find that @xmath178 has the same form as eqs . @xmath87 and @xmath146 , @xmath205 ^ 2 . \label{f - stod}\end{aligned}\ ] ] the final result of our comparison of phase - shift calculations for the interferometer shown in fig . @xmath6 is given in eq . @xmath206 . while these equations , like eq . @xmath87 , are also based on the geodesic equation of motion using the tt coordinates , @xmath207 nonetheless differs from @xmath88 by the term @xmath208 . this term comes directly from the boundary terms neglected in eq . ( when expressed in terms of resonance functions , eq . @xmath206 agrees , after the nonrelativistic limit is taken , with the phase shift calculated in @xcite up to overall factors . ) taking the low - frequency limit , we find that @xmath209 . thus , like @xmath149 , @xmath178 has the incorrect low - frequency limiting form . it also has a _ high_-frequency behavior that is dramatically different from either @xmath88 or @xmath147 , as can be seen in fig . @xmath176 . in this limit , while @xmath210 and @xmath211 ( see * appendix c * ) , @xmath212 , and dies off much more rapidly . as pointed out in @xcite , this rapid die off is due to three effects . firstly , the @xmath178 does not include the boundary terms at the mirror . these terms depend on the value of the velocity of the atom at the surface of the mirror , and the length @xmath213 , and they mitigate this rapid decrease for @xmath149 . secondly , @xmath178 depends on @xmath214 , and is constant as the atom travels through the interferometer , while @xmath150 depends on the product @xmath215 , and increases linearly with the distance the atom travels from the initial beam splitter . thirdly , since @xmath178 depends only on @xmath216 , discontinuous jumps in the velocity due to the hard wall mirrors were not taken into account in @xmath178 . from * appendix c * , these hard - wall jumps contribute directly to the high - frequency behavior of @xmath150 . calculations of the phase shift at the quantum - field - therapy level were first done by cai and papini @xcite . their starting point is the covariant version of the ginzburg - landau equation , but for a charged particle . this is a relativistic klein - gordon equation for a bosonic field @xmath217 that interacts with itself through a @xmath218 interaction ( eq . ( 2.1 ) of @xcite ) . by turning off the @xmath218 interaction , and setting the charge of the particle to zero , one recovers linet and tourrenc s starting point . if one extracts the single - particle hamiltonian from this equation , and take the correspondence principle limit of the eom , one recovers the geodesic eom used by stodolsky . thus , like linet and tourrenc , and stodolsky , cai and papini work in tt coordinates . by acting on @xmath217 with a phase operator @xmath219 , cai and papini was able to solve for a general expression for the phase shift due to gravitational effects in the weak - gravity limit through a stationary - phase type of analysis . this operator has the form [ eq . ( 3.1 ) of @xcite ] , @xmath220 ( using our notation ) for a closed path where @xmath221 is the generator of lorentz transformations , and @xmath222 is the generator of translations . we have dropped the vector potential term since the atoms we consider in this paper are not charged . as they mentioned , using stokes theorem the first term in @xmath219 can be written as @xmath223 in the weak - gravity limit ; the integral is over the timeline surface @xmath224 bounded by @xmath225 , and @xmath226 is a 2-form on @xmath224 . this expression has been explicitly verified in @xcite for the phase shift caused by riemann curvature tensor for a _ stationary _ spacetime . the second term agrees with stodolsky s expression for the phase shift . indeed , cai and papini uses eq . @xmath227 to calculate the phase shift of a model interferometer due to the passage of a gravitational wave [ eq . ( 3.15 ) of @xcite ] , and they found that up to terms of order @xmath228 , the following holds : _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ `` the @xmath229 terms in ( 3.15 ) agrees with stodolsky s result [ 11 ] when a misprint in the latter is corrected by inserting an overall factor @xmath230 . '' ( from page 415 of @xcite . ) _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ the reference [ 11 ] cited above is the work by stodolsky cited as @xcite in this paper . consequently , their expression for the phase shift , like linet and tourrenc s , and stodolsky s , also has the incorrect low - frequency limiting form . the effects of the mirrors on the test particle s phase was not considered by them either . bord and coworkers @xcite considered the use of fermionic atoms in matter - wave interferometers to measure various gravitational effects , including the detection of gravitational waves . their starting point was the dirac equation for a two - level , spin 1/2 atom expressed in curved spacetimes using the tetrad formalism . similar to cai and papini , theirs was a hamiltonian - based approach , and they showed that the dominant contribution by the gravitational wave to the hamiltonian is from a term with the form @xmath231 , where @xmath19 is the mass of the atom , and @xmath232 its momentum [ see eq . ( 10 ) of @xcite ] . the other terms in the hamiltonian due to the gravitational wave are from very small spin - gravitation couplings . these terms can be neglected here since we are dealing with atoms without spin . when this is done , the hamiltonian they calculated has the same form as eq . @xmath233 for the geodesic eom , and is manifestly different from the hamiltonian eq . @xmath234 for the geodesic _ deviation _ eom . thus they , too , worked in the tt coordinates . although an expression for the phase shift was not calculated in @xcite , they concluded the following : _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ `` the phase shift , that one can calculate from the first terms of eq . ( 10 ) , increases with the velocity of the atoms in contrast with what happens in the inertial field case and a gravitational wave detector using atomic interferometry should therefore use relativistic atoms . in this case , it can be shown directly from eq . ( 5 ) that the phase shift is proportional to @xmath235 where @xmath236 is the atomic de broglie wavelength , result which is similar to the optical case . '' ( from page 161 of @xcite . ) _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ in a subsequent paper @xcite , bord gave an explicit expression for the phase shift [ see eq . ( 98 ) of @xcite ] . it has , for its spin 0 component , the same expression , @xmath178 , for its phase shift as stodolsky s . thus , like stodolsky s approach , any phase shift calculated using this analysis would have the incorrect low - frequency limiting form as well . finally , all of the analyses that we outlined in this paper were done in the weak - gravity limit . in @xcite , a derivation of the phase shift of a quantum mechanical test particle was done without making this approximation . their analysis was also based on the geodesic - eom approach , and they arrived same expression for the phase shift that stodolsky does for spin 1/2 test particle with no approximations , while it holds only the first order in @xmath237 for spin 0 and spin 1 particles . consequently , phase shifts calculated with their expression will also have the same incorrect low - frequency limiting form as stodolsky s . there has been a preference among those who study matter - wave interferometry and gravitational waves to use tt coordinates to analyze the phase shift of an interferometer induced by gravitational waves instead of the proper reference frame . the expectation is that irrespective of which reference frame is used to calculate the phase shift , the final expression will be the same @xcite . we have shown in this paper that for matter - wave interferometry _ this expectation is wrong_. by presenting a calculation of the phase shift using the tt coordinates following the line of the analysis found in the literature @xcite , and also a calculation of the phase shift using the proper reference frame following the analysis found in @xcite , we have shown that the expressions for the phase shift obtained using the tt - coordinates _ is _ different from that obtained using the proper reference frame . moreover , we have shown that the commonly accepted expression for the phase shift eq . @xmath201which is the end result of all previous derivations of the phase shift in the literature @xcite__is incomplete _ _ , and gives yet a different expression for the phase shift of fig . this happens even though derivations of this expression were all done in tt coordinates . the focus of this paper has been on demonstrating in detail that differences exist between the various approaches to calculating the phase shift , and showing explicitly that different expressions for the phase shift are obtained . to determine which one , if any , is _ correct _ , we noted that in the limit of sufficiently low frequency gravitational waves , the correct expression for the phase shift _ must _ reduce to the well known expression for the phase shift induced by a static curvature . it must therefore be proportional to components of the riemann curvature tensor . this static phase shift can also be calculated within newtonian gravity , where the curvature is formed from gradients of the acceleration due to gravity @xmath5 . the phase shift due to @xmath5 has been measured @xcite , and recently has been used to measure gradients in @xmath5 as well @xcite . in addition , there are indications that the phase shift induced by the static riemann curvature tensor has already been seen @xcite . we have explicitly shown that when the phase shift is calculated using the proper reference frame and geodesic deviation eom , it has the expected limiting form in the low - frequency limit , and is therefore correct . the other two , both of which used the tt coordinates and the geodesic eom , do not , and are thus incorrect . the implications of this conclusion are immense . in @xcite , migo , the _ _ m__atter - wave _ _ i__nterferometric _ _ g__ravitational - wave _ _ o__bservatory , was proposed . the theoretical sensitivity predicted for migo was based on a calculation of its phase shift using the proper reference frame and the geodesic deviation eom . the conclusion arrived at in these papers was that by using _ atoms , it would be possible to construct gravitational wave observatories that are as sensitive as ligo or lisa ( the _ _ l__aser _ _ i__nterferometer _ _ s__pace _ _ a__ntenna ) , but would be orders of magnitude smaller , and have a much broader frequency response . this conclusion is diametrically opposite from the conclusions arrived previous in the literature that _ fast _ atomsindeed , ultrarelativistic onesshould be used in the matter - wave interferometer instead @xcite . the conclusion that relativistic atoms should be used in the detection of gravitational waves with matter - wave interferometers is the basis on which most of the atomic , molecular and optical physics community judges the suitability of using matter - wave interferometers as gravitational wave detectors . the physical origin of this conclusion by bord and his coworkers is the dependence of the phase shift @xmath178 on the _ square _ of the atom s velocity in the geodesic - eom - based approach ; clearly , the faster the atom , the larger the phase shift will be . even though our analysis of the phase shift was done for nonrelativistic atoms , we note that if the size of the interferometer is held constant , and only the velocity of the atom is increased , then in the high - velocity limit , @xmath238 , and eventually @xmath239 for the frequency of gravitational waves expected from astrophysical sources . the high - velocity limit is thus equivalent to the low - frequency limit for the gravitational waves , and we have shown that the low - frequency limit of @xmath178 is incorrect . thus , bord and coworker s assertion about relativistic atoms being more suitable for the detection of gravitational waves is also incorrect . all previous calculations and estimates of the phase shift in the literature also neglected the effect the mirrors of the interferometer have on the phase shift . indeed , from * appendix c * we see that it is precisely because hard wall mirrors are usedalong with the _ instantaneous _ impulsive force that they exert on the atoms when they reflect offthat the use of slow - velocity atoms leads to a sensitivity that _ increases _ with frequency is obtained . this dependence on frequency is the exact opposite for ligo and lisa @xcite , and is part of the reason that migo can be so much smaller than either one . we have not , in this paper , presented the underlying physical reasons _ why _ the current tt coordinates approach to calculating the phase shift fails , and the proper reference frame succeeds . we shall address this issue in detail later @xcite . here , we only note that one may try to modify the boundary conditions for the atom on the mirrors so that the phase shift calculated for fig . @xmath6 in tt coordinates will have the correct low - frequency limit . doing this is especially tempting in light of the following statement by thorne : _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ `` however , errors are much more likely in the tt analysis than in the proper - reference - frame analysis , because our physical intuition about how experimental apparatus behaves is proper - reference - frame based rather than tt - coordinate based . as an example , we intuitively assume that if a microwave cavity is rigid , its walls will reside at fixed coordinate locations @xmath89 . this remains true in the detector s proper reference frame ( aside from fractional changes of order @xmath240 , which are truly negligible if the detector is small and which the proper - reference - frame analysis ignores ) . but it is not true in tt coordinates ; there the coordinate locations of a rigid wall are disturbed by fractional amounts of order @xmath241 , which are crucial in analyses of microwave - cavity - based gravity wave detectors . '' ( from page 400 of @xcite . ) _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ we find that while it may be possible to suitably modify the boundary conditions to bring @xmath149 in line with the low frequency limit , doing so will be _ ad hoc _ , and will not explain the underlying physical reason for the differences between @xmath149 and @xmath150 . what is at the heart of the physics are not questions of which boundary conditions to take and how they should be modified , but rather how measurement of physical quantities are made in general relativity when the background metric varies with time . when doing an experiment to measure some physical property of a test particleits phase shift , saywe start by choosing an origin for our coordinate system . it is natural to choose as this origin some point _ on _ our measuring apparatus , which in our case is the initial beam splitter . in the three spatial dimensions , this origin is represented by a _ point _ on a three - dimension space ; this point is what we use when measurements with a _ physical _ apparatus are actually made . if we wish to represent the origin in space _ and _ time , it would seem to be natural to represent it as an _ event _ in four - dimensional _ spacetime_. coordinate systems constructed by doing so are called quasi - cartesian coordinate systems by synge . he also noted who also noted that a suitable choice of origin in spacetime for is often difficult ( see section 10 of @xcite ) , however . this is especially true in the case of gravitational waves , where the metric is nonstationary , and varies with time . in fact , by identifying the origin as an _ event _ , we have ignored the fact that our measuring apparatus is a _ physical _ object . it too must travel along a _ worldline _ in the spacetime , as will any test particle whose physical properties we are measuring . as was argued in @xcite , only _ relative _ motions of a test particle with respect to the apparatus can thus be measured . these arguments were based in part on the following observation by hawking and ellis : _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ `` in chapter 3 we saw that if the metric was static there was a relation between the magnitude of the timelike killing vector and the newtonian potential . one was able to tell whether a body was in a gravitational field by whether , if released from rest , it would accelerate with respect to the static frame defined by the killing vector . however , in general , space - time will not have any killing vectors . thus one will not have any special frame against which to measure acceleration ; the best one can do is to take two bodies close together and measure their _ relative acceleration _ [ emphasis added ] . '' ( from page 78 of @xcite . ) _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ this relative motion is not measured in the tt coordinates where the coordinates are defined relative to a fixed _ event _ , chosen as the origin , in the spacetime . the motion of the measuring apparatus through spacetime was not taking into account in the tt coordinates , so that the beam splitters and the mirrors are at _ fixed _ coordinate values . this relative motion , on the other hand , is measured in the proper reference frame where the coordinates are explicitly constructed to span the distance between the measuring apparatus , and the test particle whose properties are to be measured . the motion of the measuring apparatus has been built in from the beginning , and indeed , the positions of the beam splitters and the mirrors shift during the passage of the gravitational wave . failing to take into account the motion of the measuring apparatus in spacetime is the underlying _ physical _ reason why the wrong expression was obtain for fig . @xmath6 when the tt coordinates are used . these statements will be expanded upon , and justified in @xcite . in this * appendix * we set the framework used in our different calculations of the phase shift . like stodolsky @xcite , we use the quasi - classical approximation to calculate the phase shift of an atom in a matter - wave interferometer . this approximation is the lagrangian version of the wkb , or stationary phase approximation , in the schrdinger representation of quantum mechanics . we assume that the density of particles through the interferometer is low enough that they do not interact with one another appreciably in the time it takes for the atom to traverse the interferometer . within this approximation , the particles can be treated as test particles that interact only with the gravitational wave , and not with themselves . we can thus consider the phase shift of each atom individually , and use the feynman path integral method to calculate its phase shift . however , instead of integrating over all possible paths , we make the quasi - classical approximation , and consider only the most _ probable _ pathwhich is also the _ classical _ paththat the test particle takes through the interferometer ( see @xcite ) . as a result , @xmath242 -s^{cl}[x_a , x_b;\gamma_2]\bigg\ } , \label{def - phase - shift}\ ] ] where the superscript `` cl '' stands for `` classical '' , and @xmath243 and @xmath244 are the two possible paths a classical test particle can take through the interferometer that links a common point @xmath245 on the interferometer ( the initial beam splitter , say ) to a common point @xmath246 on the interferometer ( the final beam splitter , say ) . note that @xmath247 $ ] are functionals of the points @xmath245 and @xmath246 , along with the paths @xmath243 and @xmath244 connecting them . unlike @xcite , as well as the calculations of the phase shift done in @xcite , we will work in the nonrelativistic limit . the reason for doing so is two fold . first , the proper reference frame , as well as the general laboratory frame and all the other reference frames based on the worldline of an observer , are constructed for nonrelativistic test particles . second , as is well known , the phase shift of a matter - wave interferometer is proportional to the mass of the particle . this argues for the use of atoms in matter - wave interferometers to detect gravitational waves , as was proposed in @xcite , and in any conceivable matter - wave interferometer , these atoms will be moving nonrelativistically . the configuration of the interferometer that we use in our calculations is shown in fig . details of this interferometer can be found in @xcite . for our purposes , it is sufficient to note that the interfering test particle in the interferometer is an atom with mass @xmath19 . a beam of these atoms is emitted from an atomic source with velocity @xmath248 , and is beam - split into different diffraction orders using a diffraction grating with periodicity @xmath249 ( see @xcite ) . only the @xmath38 and @xmath57 diffraction orders are used in the interferometer . there are two possible paths , denoted as @xmath38 and @xmath57 in fig . @xmath6 , that any individual atom can follow through the interferometer ; it is not possible to tell _ a priori _ which of the two paths an atom will take . if the atom is diffracted into the @xmath38 diffraction order , then immediately after the beam splitter it will have a velocity of @xmath250 perpendicular to the longitudinal axis of the interferometer . similarly , if an atom is diffracted into the @xmath57 diffraction order , it will have a velocity of @xmath251 ( see fig . . since the diffraction grating does not impart energy to the atom , for both diffraction orders @xmath252 is the velocity of the atom parallel to the axis of the interferometer immediately after it leaves the beam splitter . in @xcite the use of hard - wall , specular reflection mirrors was considered for the matter - interferometer . mirrors of this type have been made from silicon wafers @xcite , and for near normal and near glancing angles , the reflection from these mirrors is close to 100% . these are not the mirrors that are currently used in matter - wave interferometry , however . mirrors based on diffraction gratings , standing waves of light , or stimulated raman pulses are used instead @xcite . we will nevertheless consider only the case of hard - wall mirrors in this paper , because of their simplicity . in the absence of gravitational waves , the effect of hard - wall mirrors , if they do not move , on the velocity of the atoms through the interferometer is @xmath253 where @xmath254 and @xmath255 are , respectively , the velocity of the atom immediately before it is reflected off the mirror , and immediately afterwards . in this appendix we will show how the tt gauge can be taken in the general laboratory frame in a treatment that follows @xcite . like the proper reference frame , the general laboratory frame is an orthonormal coordinate system fixed on the worldline of an observer . in our case it is fixed on the worldline of the initial beam splitter in fig . we choose a local tetrad @xmath256 fixed on the observer s worldline . thus , @xmath257 , while @xmath258 . in a slight break in the notation followed elsewhere in this paper , which follows the notational convention established in @xcite , we use in this * appendix * the convention taken in @xcite . thus , we use as the tetrad indices capital latin letters , which run from 0 to 3 . lower - case latin letters are used as the spatial tetrad indices , and they run from 1 to 3 . as usual , greek letters are used for the spacetime indices of a general coordinate @xmath259 . consider a the motion of a test particle @xmath260 close to the observer @xmath261 and her worldline . let @xmath262 be the position of @xmath263 at any proper time @xmath264 in the observer s frame . @xmath265 can also be considered as a coordinate transformation from the general coordinates @xmath259 to the tetrad frame at any time @xmath264 . thus in a small neighborhood @xmath266 of @xmath267 , @xmath268 so that @xmath269 integrating eq . @xmath270 , we find for the spatial coordinates @xmath271 where @xmath272 is a 1-form , and @xmath273 is a space - like geodesic linking @xmath261 to @xmath260 at a given proper time @xmath264 of the observer . next , after taking appropriate account of causality , the time component is @xmath274 where @xmath275 is a null - vector linking @xmath261 at time @xmath276 with @xmath260 at time @xmath264 ; the difference @xmath277 is the transit time of a light pulse emitted by @xmath261 , and scattered by @xmath260 . in the case of linearized gravity , @xmath278 . it is straightforward to see that in terms of tetrads @xmath279 this choice is _ not _ unique . if one does a _ local _ lorentz transformation @xmath280 on @xmath281 , then @xmath282 while @xmath283 . this leaves @xmath284 invariant . the usual derivation of the tt gauge makes use of a remnant of general coordinate transformation invariance still left in the linearized - gravity limit of general relativity . if @xmath285 where @xmath286 is a ` small ' , arbitrary vector , then @xmath0 transforms to @xmath287 one can choose @xmath286 such that @xmath288 can be chosen for gws in minkowski space . doing so defines a specific coordinate system , which is called the tt coordinates in @xcite . the tt gauge can also be implemented in the general laboratory frame as well . in terms of a tetrad frame , the linearized coordinate transformation eq . @xmath289 induces a lorentz transformation on the tetrads such that @xmath290 , where @xmath291 and @xmath292 . like the tt coordinates , the tt gauge can also be realized , but now through the appropriate lorentz transformation . from eq . @xmath270 , this in turn means we can choose the tt gauge in the construction of the general laboratory frame as well . in this * appendix * we consider the high - frequency limit of @xmath150 . because of its dependence on three timescales , the analysis of the high - frequency limit of @xmath150 is more involved than that for the low frequency limit . there are two cases to consider . the simplest case is when the transit time of the atom through the interferometer is very _ long _ in comparison with the period of the gravitational wave , so that @xmath293 , but @xmath166 still . to the atom , the mirrors still do not move in response to the gravitational wave , but the atom will experience many oscillations of the gravitational wave as it traverses the interferometer . in this limit the phase of the atom oscillates so fast that we would naively expect the phase shift to average to zero . it does not do so , however . we instead find that @xmath211 . that @xmath150 does not vanish in the limit of high - frequency gravitational waves is due to action of the mirrors on the atoms as they traverse through the interferometer . when the atoms reflect of the mirrors , they impart a impulsive force on the atoms that is effectively _ instantaneous _ .. since this is much shorter than any of the timescale considered here , the force can be considered as instantaneous . ] the effect of this force is readily apparent from the discontinuity in @xmath294 across the mirror in eqs . @xmath47 and @xmath117 . note in particular that the force is proportional to perturbed velocity @xmath295 of the atom _ caused by the gravitational wave _ , and is _ different _ depending on which path the atom travels through the interferometer , as can be seen from the force lines in fig . it is because of this net instantaneous force that @xmath150 does not average to zero in the high - frequency limit . when , @xmath296 as well , the mirrors themselves oscillate rapidly as the atom traverses the interferometer . this rapid motion of the mirror is not correlated with the motion of the atoms through the interferometer , however . when the atom reaches the mirror , roughly half the time it will be moving in the same direction as the mirror , which would , from eq . @xmath131 , tend to _ decelerate _ the atom . the other half of the time it will be moving in the opposite direction as the mirror , and would tend to _ accelerate _ the atom . not surprising , in this limit the resonance function decreases by a half , and @xmath297 . in this high - frequency limit @xmath150 is _ not _ proportional to @xmath298 . there is no reason to expect it to be , as there was in the low - frequency limit , however . because the mirrors exert a net forcewhich itself is the result of the passage of the gravitational wave through the systemon the atom as it passes through the interferometer , @xmath299 . m. j. snadden , j. m. mcguirk , p. bouyer , k. g. haritos , and m. a. kasevich , phys . lett . * 81 * , 971 ( 1998 ) ; j. m. mcguirk , g. t. foster , j. b. fixler , m. j. snadden , and m. a. kasevich , phys . rev . * a65 * , 033608 ( 2002 ) . Abstract:

Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.

Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered . Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video . Paper: in search for unusual magnetic ground states and spin dynamics , frustrated systems have been the main focus of both theoretical and experimental investigations in recent years.@xcite in frustrated magnetic systems,@xcite the energies of the various spin interactions compete and therefore they can not be simultaneously minimized . this competition can be induced by the geometry of the lattice on which the spins are arranged , in which case the phenomenon is called _ geometrical frustration _ and it often leads to quite unusual low temperature spin structures and dynamics . the nearest neighbor ( nn ) heisenberg antiferromagnet ( af ) on the corner - sharing kagom lattice is one of the most studied systems since it has all the ingredients such as low dimensionality , strong frustration , and low coordination number , required for a disordered `` spin liquid '' ground state.@xcite ( color online ) three possible nel states of the kagom lattice nn af : ( a ) * q*=0 with positive chirality , ( b ) * q*=0 with negative chirality , and ( c ) @xmath3 structure . the plus / minus signs indicate the chirality of spins on the elemental triangles . the shaded ( yellow ) areas indicate the magnetic unit cells . note that the nel sates shown above have continuous degeneracy as the spins on a line ( a - b ) and on a hexagon ( c ) can be rotated out of the plane as shown by ellipses without changing the classical ground state energy . , width=302 ] figure [ kagome ] shows three possible nel states of the kagom lattice nn antiferromagnet . in the classical limit , all ground states satisfy the 120@xmath4 structure " , in which the angle between each nn pair of spins is 120@xmath4 . [ kagome]a - b shows * q*=0 type ordering with respectively positive and negative chirality . for positive ( negative ) chirality the direction in which the spins rotate as one traverses clockwise the triangle of sites is clockwise ( counterclockwise ) . [ kagome]c shows the @xmath5 spin structure which has triangles with both positive and negative chirality . from the spin configurations shown in fig . [ kagome ] , it is clear the the classical ground state has a continuous degeneracy due to the weathervane " rotation of the spins@xcite and therefore no long range magnetic order is expected even at zero temperature . however , in real systems , there are small perturbations such as next nearest neighbor ( nnn ) interactions,@xcite anisotropies or defects . it has been also shown that thermal or quantum fluctuations could also lift some of the continuous degeneracy known as order by disorder , " yielding coplanar spin structures.@xcite despite the extensive theoretical studies that suggest many possible fascinating frustrated ground states for the kagom nn af , few experimental realizations exist for the system . the initial experimental studies were focused on the layered garnet , srcr@xmath6ga@xmath7o@xmath8.@xcite however the interpretation of the magnetic properties of this system were complicated by the presence of an additional triangular lattice interposed between kagom layers and by the inherent configurational randomness associated with the random alloying . in recent years , it has been shown that the jarosite family of minerals @xmath9,@xcite ( where a is monovalent ion such as k@xmath10 , and m is trivalent cation such as fe@xmath11 , cr@xmath11 , or v@xmath11 ) form much better realization of the two dimensional ( 2d ) kagom lattice . as shown in fig . [ alunite ] for m = fe jarosite , the magnetic ion @xmath12 is centered in a slightly distorted and tilted oxygen octahedra , and it forms a kagom lattice in the @xmath13-plane . the kagom planes are widely separated by nonmagnetic @xmath14 and @xmath15 ions . with an exception of the hydronium jarosite @xmath16 , all members of jarosite family are found to exhibit long range magnetic order ( lro ) at finite temperatures with varying ground state spin configurations and exchange interaction strengths depending on the magnetic ion m. the strength of exchange interaction is the greatest for the parent m = fe@xmath11 ( @xmath17 ) jarosite with curie - weiss temperature @xmath18 k and @xmath19 k. replacement of the fe@xmath11 centers by cr@xmath11 ( @xmath20 also affords an antiferromanetically ordered material but with a significant reduced @xmath21 k and @xmath22 k. interestingly , when the magnetic ion is replaced by v@xmath11 , the ground state is changed to ferromagnetic kagom layers which are coupled antiferromanetically.@xcite as we will discuss detail below , such a ferromagnetic ordering on the kagom lattice is allowed by the representation theory in contrast to a previous analysis.@xcite among the members of the jarosite family , @xmath23 ( fej ) is probably the most studied one . the magnetic ground state of fej was first investigated by townsend _ _ using neutron diffraction.@xcite however , later it became clear that the proposed spin configuration in ref . was not quite correct.@xcite inami _ et al_@xcite presented a detailed neutron scattering study and determined that the fej has 2d kagom planes with the * q*=0 spin - structure with positive chirality as shown in fig . [ kagome]a . they observed that the unit cell along the @xmath24-axis is doubled in the magnetic phase , suggesting the the kagom planes are antiferromagnetically coupled . field - dependent magnetization measurements@xcite have suggested that each kagom plane has a small ferromagnetic component due to the canting of the spins in the * q*=0 structure with positive chirality ( this is the so called `` umbrella '' configuration ) . however to the best of our knowledge , there is no experimental data which indicates the direction of this spin - canting whose determination would allow one to deduce the sign of some of the anisotropic terms in the hamiltonian , as we will discuss in detail later . ( color online ) conventional unit cell of fej . for clarity only fe , big spheres ( blue ) and the octahedral oxygens , small spheres ( red ) are shown . the tilting angle , @xmath25 of the feo@xmath26 octahedra is also shown.,width=188 ] the fact that fej exhibits lro at finite temperature indicates that there are interactions other than nn isotropic af superexchange , such as nnn interactions , anisotropies , etc . et al._@xcite have pointed out that in fej , the oxygen - octahedra are significantly tilted ( see fig . [ alunite ] ) , thereby inducing a strong single - ion crystal field ( cf ) anisotropy . they used this cf term in the hamiltonian to explain the observed spin configuration and to calculate the spin - wave spectrum . however in their spin - wave calculations , they neglected the canting of the spins out of the kagom plane . as we will discuss in detail below , this neglect leads to qualitatively wrong results for the spin - wave energy gaps at the high symmetry points in the brillouin zone . elhajal _ et al._@xcite have pointed out that cf terms in fej should be fairly small because they are second order in the spin - orbit coupling and fe@xmath11 has a spherical charge distribution ( _ i . @xmath27 ) . hence as an alternative source of anisotropy , they suggested that the dzyaloshinskii - moriya ( dm ) interaction of the form:@xcite @xmath28 could stabilize the experimentally observed spin structure . indeed , the @xmath29-component of the dm vector ( the definition of its components is given below ) forces the spins to lie in the @xmath30plane and therefore effectively acts like an easy - plane anisotropy . the sign of @xmath31 can distinguish between the @xmath32=0 states with negative and positive chirality . since the @xmath33 state has triangles with both positive and negative chirality , the @xmath31 term alone will not affect the energy of this state . furthermore if we introduce a @xmath34 component , we break the rotational symmetry around the @xmath24-axis and create a small anisotropy with respect to in - plane orientations . the effect of @xmath34 is also to ca nt the spins ( so that they have a small out - of - plane component ) into the observed umbrella " spin configuration . finally , since the dm interaction occurs at first - order in the spin - orbit coupling , it is expected to be larger than the cf terms of inami _ et al._@xcite in order to identify the origin of the magnetic interactions that are responsible for the lro in fej compounds , clearly we need more experimental data such as the observed spin - wave spectrum . fortunately , thanks to the very recent progress in the synthesis of high - quality single crystals of fej compounds,@xcite such spin - wave data has been recently become available.@xcite here we present a detailed theory for the spin - wave spectrum in fej compound for generic nn and nnn superexchange interactions including the cf and dm terms discussed above . as we shall see below , the dm term along with the nn and nnn isotropic interactions can explain quite well not only the observed spin configuration but also the observed spin - wave spectrum . briefly this paper is organized as follows . in the next section we first discuss the symmetry of the fej structure in the paramagnetic phase and then present a brief representation analysis of the allowed magnetic structures . in doing so , we discovered that in wills s analysis,@xcite some of the ferromagnetic wavefunctions were missing . indeed such a structure consisting of ferromagnetic easy - plane kagom planes has been observed for a nav - jarosite.@xcite in this section , we also argue that characterization by irreducible representations is more fundamental than by the chirality of the * q*=0 state . in sec . iii we discuss the generic magnetic hamiltonian that we use in our calculations . in this section , we first discuss the symmetry of the hamiltonian matrix and then its representation in a coordinate system in which the local @xmath29-axis coincides with the local direction of the spin moments . here we also treat the canting of the spin orientations . in sec . iv , we derive analytic results for the spin - wave energy gaps at the @xmath35 , @xmath36 and @xmath37-points of the brillouin zone . in sec . v , we present spin - wave spectra from numerical calculations and compare the results with the recent spin - wave data of matan _ et al_.@xcite here we consider several models with increasing complexity . we find that the dm terms combined with nn and nnn isotropic exchange interactions give an excellent fit to the data . our conclusions are summarized in sec . the details of the diagonalization of the spin hamiltonian were given in appendices . in appendix a , we describe the transformation to the boson representations of the spins . in appendix b , we discuss how to obtain the normal mode energies and eigenvectors . appendix c describes the actual calculations of the matrix elements and appendix d gives the results for the dynamical structure factor in terms of the normal mode energies and eigenvectors . we first discuss the symmetry of the paramagnetic phase . in fig . [ alunite ] we show the conventional unit cell which contains three formula units of fej . the primitive unit cell ( which contains one formula unit of fej ) is rhombohedral , with basis lattice vectors @xmath38 where @xmath24 denotes the height of the conventional unit cell of fig . [ alunite ] . the space group of fej is r@xmath39 m , which is # 166 in the international tables of crystallography.@xcite in order to understand the magnetic properties of fej we show in fig . [ kplane ] only the fe @xmath40 spins . their locations within the primitive unit cell , denoted @xmath41 , are @xmath42 where the components are given with respect to the orthogonal axes of fig . [ kplane ] . notice that each plane ( e. g. the filled circles ) forms a kagom plane lattice . as one moves from one plane to the adjacent plane at more positive @xmath29 , the kagom lattice is translated by @xmath43 , or , equivalently by either @xmath44 or @xmath45 . ( color online . ) kagom planes . the filled circles are @xmath46-@xmath47 planes at @xmath48 , the filled squares are @xmath46-@xmath47 planes at @xmath49 , and the filled triangles are @xmath46-@xmath47 planes at @xmath50 . the positive @xmath29-axis is out of the plane . representative sublattice numbers @xmath51 are given.,height=188 ] apart from translations the generators of the space group may be taken to be @xmath52 , spatial inversion about the center of a hexagon , @xmath53 , a two - fold rotation about an axis parallel to the @xmath46-axis and passing through the center of the hexagon , and @xmath54 , a three - fold rotation about an axis passing through the center of the hexagon perpendicular to the kagom plane . since the center of a hexagon in one plane lies just above a triangle in an adjacent plane , the three - fold axis can be taken at the center of a triangle . the above operations imply the existence of mirror planes perpendicular to the kagom plane and bisecting the sides of the hexagons . the reciprocal lattice basis vectors @xmath55 , which satisfy @xmath56 , where @xmath57 is the kronecker delta , are @xmath58 since interactions between adjacent kagom planes are very small , we may approximately describe the structure in terms of a two - dimensional hexagonal lattice with basis vectors , @xmath59 , given by @xmath60 the associated reciprocal lattice of this hexagonal lattice has basis vectors @xmath61 in contrast the three - dimensional reciprocal lattice vectors in the @xmath48 plane for fej are @xmath62 as shown in fig . [ fejfig ] , the vectors of eq . ( [ hexeq ] ) define the hexagonal brillouin zones and those of eq . ( [ fejeq ] ) define the boundaries of the fej brillouin zone in the @xmath48 plane . ( color online . ) reciprocal lattices for the fej system ( blue squares ) and for the two - dimensional hexagonal lattice ( red circles ) . the first brillouin zone for the two - dimensional hexagonal system is indicated by heavy solid lines in red and that ( in the @xmath48 plane ) for the fej system by heavy dashed lines in blue . the light solid lines in red mark the boundaries of neighboring hexagonal zones . the fej brillouin zone is three times as large as the hexagonal zone.,height=188 ] the first brillouin zone of the fej system in the hexagonal plane has an area three times that of the two - dimensional hexagonal system . if there were absolutely no interactions between kagom planes , the spin - wave dispersion relation in the region in the first brillouin zone of the fej system but outside that of thetwo - dimensional hexagonal system could be mapped into the dispersion relation inside the first brillouin zone of the two - dimensional system and in this paper we adopt this picture . for the two dimensional system , spin - wave energies at points just outside the hexagonal brillouin zone near point y are exactly the same as at the corresponding point just inside the zone near y. for the three dimensional fej system this is only approximately true . the spectra of these two points will differ due to interplanar interactions . similarly , for the two - dimensional system the spin - wave energies at point z are identical to those at @xmath35 , whereas for the fej system they will differ due to interplanar interactions . we will show the spin - wave spectrum observed by matan et al.@xcite along the line @xmath63 , where @xmath64 is equivalent to @xmath37 if interplanar interactions are neglected . a continuous phase transition may be described by a landau expansion in powers of @xmath65 , the fourier components of the spin order parameters which are defined as @xmath66 where @xmath67 is the spin at site @xmath51 in the unit cell at @xmath68 , @xmath69 denotes a thermal average , and @xmath32 is the wavevector of the ordering . at quadratic order the landau expansion for the free energy , @xmath70 , assumes the form @xmath71 where @xmath72 labels cartesian components and @xmath73 . the ordering that actually occurs corresponds to the eigenvector associated with that eigenvalue of the quadratic form of eq . ( [ feq2 ] ) which first becomes negative ( unstable ) as the temperature is lowered starting from the paramagnetic phase . in view of the invariance of @xmath70 with respect to the symmetry operations of the crystal , one can say that the eigenvectors give rise to an irreducible representation ( irrep ) of the space group of the crystal.@xcite this analysis is straightforward and has been given previously,@xcite although the results we present below seem to contradict that reference . because spin is a pseudovector , spatial inversion takes a spin into its spatially inverted location but does not reorient the spin . since all spins are located at centers of inversion symmetry , we only need to consider irreps which are invariant under spatial inversion , and we denote these by @xmath74 , where the label @xmath75 assumes the values @xmath76 and the superscript indicates invariance under spatial inversion . for the one dimensional irreps ( @xmath77 and @xmath78 ) the situation is quite simple : each eigenvector of @xmath70 is also an eigenvector of each operation of the space group . thus we show in fig . [ g1g2 ] the possible spin configurations which correspond to one dimensional irreps . the actual spin configuration associated with irrep @xmath78 is a linearcombination of the two configurations shown . spin configurations which transform according to one dimensional irreps . solid circles indicate spins pointing out of the page . top : a configuration of @xmath77 for which the eigenvalue of @xmath53 is @xmath79 and @xmath54 is @xmath79 . bottom : two configurations for @xmath78 for which the eigenvalue of @xmath53 is @xmath80 and @xmath54 is @xmath79.,height=226 ] for the two dimensional irrep @xmath81 the situation is more complicated . here one has @xmath82 wavefunctions @xmath83 , for @xmath84 which transform as the first row of the matrix representation of @xmath81 and their @xmath82 partners @xmath85 which transform as the second row of the matrix representation of @xmath81 , where for fej @xmath86.@xcite we show these wavefunctions in fig . [ g3 ] . to be specific , if @xmath87 is a symmetry operation and @xmath88 is a matrix representation of it according to @xmath81 , then we have spin configurations which transform according to two dimensional irrep @xmath81 . in the left ( right ) column we give the wavefunctions which transform according to the first ( second ) row of the matrices of the irrep . arrows represent spins of unit length . solid ( open ) circles indicate spins pointing perpendicularly into ( out of ) the kagom plane . for @xmath89 the magnitudes of the inward spins are both equal to half that of the outward spin which is set to be @xmath90 . for @xmath91 the nonzero magnitudes of the spins are both @xmath92.,height=321 ] @xmath93 these wavefunctions of @xmath81 correspond to the choice @xmath94 \ , \ \ \ \ { \cal m}(r ) = \left [ \begin{array } { c c } -1/2 & - \sqrt 3 /2 \\ \sqrt 3 /2 & -1/2 \\ \end{array } \right ] \ .\end{aligned}\ ] ] one can check that the wavefunctions shown in fig . [ g3 ] actually do satisfy eq . ( [ trans ] ) . of course , all the wavefunctions shown here are orthogonal to one another and span the original subspace of spin components . ( that appears not to be the case with the results of ref . . in addition , his states do not seem to allow the net moment for a single kagom layer to lie in the kagom plane . since this does happens for a na jarosite,@xcite the statement that the structure of the chromate jarosite must be the umbrella structure is not justified . ) we now discuss the implications of the above results . the above results hold for two separate cases : in the ferromagnetic case , all kagom planes have the same spin structure ( apart from a translation ) , whereas in the antiferromagnetic case successive kagom plane have their spins inverted . the ferromagnetic case corresponds to wavevector @xmath95 , whereas the antiferromagnetic case corresponds to @xmath96.@xcite note that irrep @xmath78 has two wavefunctions . this means that any such structure generically consists of a linear combination of a ferromagnetic state ( in a layer ) with spins perpendicular to the plane and some in - plane ordering as well . this is the so - called `` umbrella '' state . the implication is that if one has an easy axis ferromagnet with spins perpendicular to the kagom plane , one unavoidably will have some in - plane order . conversely , in the case of fej one has order of irrep @xmath81 in each plane which must be accompanied by a net out - of plane moment . note that the irreps @xmath77 and @xmath78 are ising - like in that within these representations one can not uniformly rotate the spins . thus the excitation spectrum must have a significant energy gap . in contrast irrep @xmath81 is @xmath46-@xmath47-like . one spin structure is some linear combination of the wavefunctions of the left column of fig . alternatively , the free energy is unchanged if one instead takes the _ same _ linear combination of the wavefunctions of the right column of fig . the actual wavefunction is therefore characterized by four constants , @xmath72 , @xmath97 , @xmath98 and @xmath99 : @xmath100 \nonumber \\ & & \ + \sin \theta \left [ \alpha \psi^{(3,2)}_a + \beta \psi^{(3,2)}_b + \gamma \psi^{(3,2)}_c \right ] \ , \end{aligned}\ ] ] which can not be fixed by symmetry . at quadratic level in the landau expansion , the free energy does not depend on @xmath99 and one would expect a goldstone ( gapless ) mode . however , due to the discrete symmetry of the kagom plane , the anisotropy energy , @xmath101 , which at lowest order is @xmath102 will lead to a gap . if @xmath103 , the system will favor @xmath104 ( or equivalent angles ) whereas if @xmath105 the system will favor angles equivalent to @xmath106 . quadratic energies , such as the dipolar energy , will not lead to a gap . accordingly , it is not surprising that we found that for @xmath107 the dipolar energy of the system was independent of @xmath99 . it is interesting to note that if one assumes isotropic nearest neighbor ( nn ) and next - nearest neighbor ( nnn ) interactions , then spin configurations @xmath108 and @xmath109 have the same energy . however , in general irrep @xmath110 will have lower energy because it can accommodate a distortion into the configuration @xmath111 . in principle , local single - ion anisotropy@xcite and/or dm interactions@xcite can select a ground state from among these functions . in the literature , there are frequent references to `` chirality . '' configurations have positive chirality , if when one traverses a triangle of spins clockwise , the spins rotate clockwise by @xmath112 , whereas for negative chirality @xmath113 . in our opinion , the characterization by irreps is more fundamental . one sees that the wavefunction of irrep @xmath77 and one of those of @xmath114 correspond to positive chirality and two of the wavefunctions for @xmath81 correspond to negative chirality . however , the sign of the chirality , of itself , does not indicate the presence or not of a gap in the excitation spectrum . nor does the sign of the chirality correlate in an obvious way with the nature of other wavefunctions which may be admixed . spin structure of fej as determined in refs . , , and .,height=188 ] the actual magnetic structure@xcite of fej is that shown in fig . [ spin ] associated with the wavevector @xmath115 . this means that successive kagom planes are translated ( as they would be in the paramagnetic phase ) , but then in successive planes the spin orientations are reversed . this causes a doubling of the unit cell because after three translations , the sites are back to their original positions , but the spin orientations are reversed . thus the magnetic unit cell contains twice as many layers as in the paramagnetic phase . although each layer individually has a small ferromagnetic moment perpendicular to the kagom plane , the sign of this moment alternates in sign from one kagom net to the next , so that the sample exhibits no overall net moment . however , as in la@xmath116cuo@xmath117,@xcite one has a spin - flop transition@xcite when a magnetic field perpendicular to the kagom plane rearranges the planes so that their ferromagnetic moments are parallel . ( color online ) spin structure of fej . the squares ( blue ) are sites in the kagom plane at @xmath49 , the triangles ( yellow ) are sites in the plane at @xmath118 and the circles ( red ) are sites in the plane at @xmath48 . the two symmetry related choices for spin orientations in the ordered phase are shown in the two panels.,height=132 ] here we discuss some aspects of broken symmetry . one could ask whether the direction of the net moment of a kagom plane is fixed by interactions within the plane or is accidentally selected . first , we should note that if we had a single isolated kagom plane , then the two orientations or the net moment perpendicular to the plane would have identical free energy . as we will see , the direction of the net moment is fixed by the sign of the dm interaction . if we had a single kagom plane , such an interaction would not be allowed . so , the uniqueness of the direction of the moment perpendicular to the plane , must depend on the details of the three - dimensional structure and , because @xmath119 and @xmath120 are equivalent in the paramagnetic crystal , on the in - plane magnetic ordering . to see how this is possible consider fig . the actual spin structure is shown in the two panels of fig . the selection of one of these states is arbitrary and represents an example of broken symmetry . let us see how the direction of the net moment perpendicular to the plane is fixed relative to the in - plane ordering . suppose we have the broken symmetry selection of the structure shown in the left panel . there one sees that the in - plane spin moments point away from sites in the @xmath118 plane and towards sites in the @xmath49 plane . this indicates that positive and negative @xmath29 are not equivalent _ due to the presence of long - range magnetic order in the three - dimensional crystal structure_. this means that when the spin order is as in the left panel , the free energy will select the direction of the perpendicular moment . when the spin order is as in the right panel , the perpendicular moment will be reversed relative to what it was in the left panel . as we will see , when the in - plane order is selected , the direction of the out - of plane moment is determined by the sign of the @xmath47-component of the dm vector . it is interesting to note that the direction of the perpendicular moment can not be related to chirality . the structures shown in fig . [ lro ] have positive chirality whether seen by a viewer from in front of the page or behind the page . so associating a direction with chirality can not distinguish between directions into or out of the page . we neglect interactions between adjacent kagom planes . accordingly , we now discuss the hamiltonian of a single kagom plane . we first parameterize the nn interaction between spins # 1 and # 2 in fig . [ bonds ] , which we write as @xmath121 where the greek superscripts label cartesian components . the effect of the mirror plane perpendicularly bisecting the 1 - 2 bond is to change the sign of the @xmath47- and @xmath29-components of spin and simultaneously interchange spin labels . thus taking the transpose of the matrix and changing the signs of the @xmath47- and @xmath29-components must leave the matrix invariant . so the interaction matrix must be of the form @xmath122 \ , \label{nn } \end{aligned}\ ] ] where the superscript indicates an nn interaction and we introduce symmetric anisotropic exchange tensor @xmath123 and antisymmetric dm interactions,@xcite characterized by a dm vector @xmath124 . note that the definition of eq . ( [ defeq ] ) implies that @xmath125 independent of what the local symmetry may be , where tilde indicates a transposed matrix . numbering of sites used to define nn and nnn interactions . the axes fixed in the crystal are shown.,height=188 ] we next characterize the nnn interaction between sites # 5 and # 2 in fig . [ bonds ] . this interaction has to be invariant under the two - fold rotation about the @xmath46-axis passing through the center of the bond . so the interaction matrix in cartesian coordinates must be of the form @xmath126 \ , \label{nnn } \end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath127 is the nnn dm interaction and @xmath128 is the symmetric nnn interaction . we also include a single - ion anisotropy energy @xmath129 for site @xmath130 of the form @xmath131_i^{\alpha \beta } [ s_i^\alpha s_i^\beta + s_i^\beta s_i^\alpha ] \ .\end{aligned}\ ] ] the mirror @xmath46-plane through site # 3 implies that the single - ion anisotropy matrix for this site is @xmath132 \ .\end{aligned}\ ] ] a direct , but inefficient , procedure would be to use the symmetry of the crystal to express all the other nn and nnn interactions in terms of the matrices of eqs . ( [ nn ] ) and ( [ nnn ] ) , respectively . instead , we proceed as follows . we express the nn and nnn interactions in terms of local axes which facilitate a spin - wave expansion . these local axes are defined so that the local positive @xmath29 axis coincides with the projection of the local spin moment onto the kagom plane . these axes are illustrated in fig . [ local ] . the rotation matrices to transform to these local axes are @xmath133 \ , \nonumber \\ { \cal r}(\tau_2 ) & = & \left [ \begin{array } { c c c } { 1 \over 2 } & 0 & { \sqrt 3 \over 2 } \\ { \sqrt 3 \over 2 } & 0 & - { 1\over 2 } \\ 0 & 1 & 0 \\ \end{array } \right ] \ , \nonumber \\ { \cal r}(\tau_3 ) & = & \left [ \begin{array } { c c c } -1 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 1 \\ 0 & 1 & 0 \\ \end{array } \right ] \ .\end{aligned}\ ] ] the transformed interaction matrices , denoted @xmath52 , are such that @xmath134 and @xmath135 where now the spin components are taken in the local axes of fig . [ local ] so that @xmath136 here @xmath137 \ , \label{effsw } \end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath138 where @xmath139 so that @xmath140 is the isotropic part of the @xmath75th neighbor interaction and we will only keep the anisotropic nn interactions , so that henceforth @xmath141 and @xmath142 . we define @xmath143 with a sign so that the interactions appear ferromagnetic in the local frame . the matrix elements @xmath144 lead to a canted spin structure exhibiting weak ferromagnetism , as we will see in the next subsection . the single - ion anisotropy in the local frame can be written as @xmath145 \ . \label{cparam } \end{aligned}\ ] ] a big advantage of expressing the interactions in terms of local axes is that all single - ion anisotropies and all nn interaction matrices are identical ( apart from transposing if site indices are interchanged ) . using the three - fold axis and inversion symmetry we find that @xmath146 where the sites are numbered as in fig . [ local ] . local axes of various sites . the local @xmath29-axis ( indicated by the full line with arrow ) is along the projection of the direction of the local magnetization onto the kagom plane . the local @xmath47-axis is perpendicularly out of the kagom plane . the local @xmath46-axis is in the kagom plane and is indicated by the dashed line with arrow.,height=188 ] just as for nearest neighbors , all the next nearest neighbor interaction matrices are the same , providing we take the indices in the correct order . up to now we have taken the local @xmath29-axes to lie in the kagom plane . however , the matrix elements @xmath144 for @xmath147 or @xmath148 gives rise to a field which induces a uniform @xmath47 component of spin . for the spin - wave calculation it is convenient to define `` canted local axes '' such that the canted @xmath29-axes lie along the direction of the canted spins . this direction is found by minimizing the energy . we write the ground state energy per site , @xmath149 , for @xmath150 and @xmath151 as @xmath152 \cos^2 \theta \nonumber \\ & & \ + [ c_{yy } - 2 e_y^{(1)}-2e_y^{(2 ) } ] \sin^2 \theta \nonumber \\ & & \ + 2 [ c_{yz } + 2 e_{yz}^{(1)}+2e_{yz}^{(2 ) } ] \sin \theta \cos \theta \nonumber \\ & \equiv & - a_{cc } \cos^2 \theta - a_{ss } \sin^2 \theta + 2 a_{cs } \sin \theta \cos \theta \nonumber \\ & = & - { 1 \over 2 } [ a_{cc}+a_{ss } ] - h_z \cos ( 2 \theta ) \nonumber \\ & & \ - h_y \sin ( 2 \theta ) \ , \end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath153/2 \ , \ \ \ \ h_y = - a_{cs } \ . \end{aligned}\ ] ] the energy is minimized by setting @xmath154 where @xmath155 . if we neglect the effect of anisotropic nnn interactions on the canting angle , we have @xmath156 = -c_{yz } - \sqrt 3 d_y + j_{yz } \nonumber \\ h_z & = & e_z^{(1 ) } - e_y^{(1 ) } - { 1 \over 2 } c_{zz } + { 1 \over 2 } c_{yy } \nonumber \\ & & \ + e_z^{(2 ) } - e_y^{(2 ) } \nonumber \\ & = & { 3 \over 2 } j_1 - { \sqrt 3 \over 2 } d_z + { c_{y - z } \over 2 } + { 3 \over 2 } j_2 + { 3 \delta_j - \eta_j \over 8 } \ , \label{hyzeq } \end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath157 . here and below the superscript `` 1 '' for nn s is implied in the anisotropic interactions . the ` initial ' and ` final ' local @xmath47 and @xmath29 axes . initially the @xmath29 axis is in the kagom plane . the sign of @xmath99 is the same that of @xmath158 , which is the negative of @xmath159 , i .e . the negative of @xmath34 . ] this means that we want to transform the initial local coordinates with moments in the kagom plane into the canted local coordinates via @xmath160 as illustrated in fig . [ axes ] , where @xmath161 and @xmath162 . then , if we include this transformation we finally arrive at the local anisotropy matrix as @xmath163 \ , \label{cdef } \end{aligned}\ ] ] and the transformed local interaction matrices are @xmath164 \ , \end{aligned}\ ] ] and similarly for @xmath165 , where @xmath166 \sin ( 2 \theta ) \ , \nonumber \\ \overline e_{yz}^{(n ) } & = & e_{yz}^{(n ) } \cos ( 2 \theta ) + { 1 \over 2 } [ e_z^{(n ) } - e_y^{(n ) } ] \sin(2 \theta ) \nonumber \\ \overline d_z^{(n ) } & = & c d_z^{(n ) } + s d_y^{(n ) } \nonumber \\ \overline d_y^{(n ) } & = & c d_y^{(n ) } - s d_z^{(n ) } \ . \label{tilde } \end{aligned}\ ] ] an equivalent condition for equilibrium is that @xmath167 when the @xmath46-@xmath29 elements are summed over all neighbors they give a vanishing effective field . indeed , group theory guarantees that this is the case for general interactions . in appendix [ boson ] we write the hamiltonian in terms of boson operators and in appendix [ modes ] we obtain the wavevector dependent spin - wave dynamical matrix ( swdm ) @xmath168 whose eigenvalues are the spin - wave energies at wavevector @xmath32 and which is written as @xmath169 \ .\end{aligned}\ ] ] the matrices @xmath170 and @xmath171 are given in eqs . ( [ adef ] ) and ( [ bdef ] ) , respectively . we write them as @xmath172 and @xmath173 where @xmath174 , @xmath175 is the unit matrix , and for @xmath147 or 2 @xmath176 is @xmath177 \gamma_{1,2}^{(n)}({\bf q } ) & + 2 i \overline d_z^{(n ) } ] \gamma_{1,3}^{(n)}({\bf q } ) \\ \hline [ -e_x^{(n ) } - \overline e_y^{(n ) } & 4\overline e_z^{(n ) } & [ -e_x^{(n ) } - \overline e_y^{(n ) } \\ + 2 i \overline d_z^{(n ) } ] \gamma_{1,2}^{(n)}({\bf q } ) & & -2 i \overline d_z^{(n ) } ] \gamma_{2,3}^{(n)}({\bf q } ) \\ \hline [ -e_x^{(n ) } - \overline e_y^{(n ) } & [ -e_x^{(n ) } - \overline e_y^{(n ) } & 4\overline e_z^{(n ) } \\ -2 i \overline d_z^{(n ) } ] \gamma_{1,3}^{(n)}({\bf q } ) & + 2 i \overline d_z^{(n ) } ] \gamma_{2,3}^{(n)}({\bf q } ) & \\ \hline \end{array } \right ] \ , \label{mataeq } \end{aligned}\ ] ] and @xmath178 is @xmath179 & [ - e_x^{(n ) } + \overline e_y^{(n ) } ] \\ & \times \gamma_{1,2}^{(n)}({\bf q } ) & \times \gamma_{1,3}^{(n)}({\bf q } ) \\ \hline [ - e_x^{(n ) } + \overline e_y^{(n ) } ] & 0 & [ - e_x^{(n ) } + \overline e_y^{(n ) } ] \\ \times \gamma_{1,2}^{(n)}({\bf q } ) & & \times \gamma_{2,3}^{(n)}({\bf q } ) \\ \hline [ - e_x^{(n ) } + \overline e_y^{(n ) } ] & [ - e_x^{(n ) } + \overline e_y^{(n ) } ] & 0 \\ \times \gamma_{1,3}^{(n)}({\bf q } ) & \times \gamma_{2,3}^{(n)}({\bf q } ) & \\ \hline \end{array } \right ] \ , \label{matbeq } \end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath180 is the normalized form factor for the @xmath75th shell of neighbors . here we we will only treat @xmath181 . for in - plane interactions we have @xmath182 \ , \nonumber \\ \gamma_{23}^{(1)}({\bf q } ) & = & \cos [ a ( q_x - \sqrt 3 q_y)/4 ] \ , \nonumber \\ \gamma_{12}^{(2)}({\bf q } ) & = & \cos ( a q_y \sqrt 3 /2 ) \ , \nonumber \\ \gamma_{13}^{(2)}({\bf q } ) & = & \cos [ a ( 3 q_x - \sqrt 3 q_y)/4 ] \ , \nonumber \\ \gamma_{23}^{(2)}({\bf q } ) & = & \cos [ a ( 3 q_x + \sqrt 3 q_y)/4 ] \ .\end{aligned}\ ] ] in eqs . ( [ mataeq ] ) and ( [ matbeq ] ) one one uses eq . ( [ tilde ] ) to relate the overlined coefficients to the bare coefficients , which are defined in eqs . ( [ cdef ] ) and ( [ param ] ) . to simplify the expressions we will now specialize to the case when the nnn interactions are isotropic and all interactions further than nnn are ignored . then we write the matrix @xmath170 in the form @xmath183 \ , \label{nmataeq } \end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath184 denotes @xmath185 . the matrix @xmath171 is of the form @xmath186 \ . \label{nmatbeq } \end{aligned}\ ] ] in appendix [ evaluate ] we evaluate of the constants in the matrices for the general hamiltonian introduced above . in the interest of simplicity we now limit consideration to the following generic hamiltonian : @xmath187 \nonumber \\ & & \ + \sum_{k < l \in nnn } j_2 s_k \cdot s_l \nonumber \\ & + & d \sum_{i } ( s_i^{y'})^2 - e \sum_{i } [ ( s_i^{z'})^2 -(s_i^{x'})^2 ] \label{model_h}\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath188 ( @xmath189 ) indicates that the sum is over nn s ( nnn s ) , @xmath190 is the dzyaloskinskii - moriya vector for bond @xmath191 as shown in fig . [ bonds ] and the single - ion anisotropy terms are those used by nishiyama _ et al._@xcite in their treatment of the spin - wave spectrum in jarosites . here the prime - spin components refer to the local axis associated with the rotated oxygen octahedra shown in fig . 1 ( see ref . for details ) . the @xmath192 and @xmath193 are all expressible in terms of the parameters @xmath34 and @xmath31 as discussed in sec . the single - ion anisotropy constants @xmath194 and @xmath195 used in ref . are related to our generic single - ion matrix @xmath196 defined in the uncanted - local frame given in eq . ( [ cparam ] ) as @xmath197 where @xmath198 is the rotation angle of the octahedra around fe - ion ( see fig . [ alunite ] ) and is @xmath199.@xcite in what follows we will often have recourse to two simple models . in the first of these , which we call the `` dm '' model , we neglect the single ion anisotropy and the exchange anisotropy , so that the only nonzero parameters are @xmath1 , @xmath2 , @xmath34 , and @xmath31 . in the second model , which we call the `` cf '' model , all the anisotropy is incorporated by the single - ion crystal field , so that the only nonzero parameters are @xmath1 , @xmath2 , and @xmath200 . in either case , we assume @xmath1 to be the dominant interaction . accordingly we give here the expressions for the matrix elements of the swdm which pertain to these two cases : @xmath201 \ , \nonumber \\ a_1 & = & { 1 \over 2 } j_1 + { \sqrt 3 \over 2 } d_z + { 1 \over 6j_1 } \biggl [ 3d_y^2-c_{yz}^2 \biggr ] \ , \nonumber \\ b_0 & = & c_{xx}-c_{yy } - { 2c_{yz}^2 \over 3j_1 } \ , \nonumber \\ b_1 & = & - { 3 \over 2 } j_1 + { \sqrt 3 \over 2 } d_z + { c_{yz}^2 - 3 d_y^2 \over 6j_1 } \ , \nonumber \\ \alpha_1 & = & { 1 \over \sqrt 3 } c_{yz } + { 2 \sqrt 3 d_y d_z \over 3j_1 } - { d_y j_2 \over j_1 } \ , \nonumber \\ \alpha_2 & = & { d_y j_2 \over j_1 } \ . \label{eq47}\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath202 . at zero wavevector the swdm , @xmath203 , whose eigenvalues give @xmath204 , is | c | c | c || + & dm model & cf model + @xmath205 & @xmath206 & @xmath207^{1/2 } + { \cal o}(c^{5/2}/j^{3/2})$ ] + @xmath208 & @xmath209 & @xmath210^{1/2 } + { \cal o}(c^{5/2}/j^{3/2})$ ] + @xmath211 & @xmath212 & @xmath213 + + & dm model & cf model + @xmath205 & @xmath214 & @xmath215^{1/2}$ ] + @xmath216 & @xmath217 & @xmath218^{1/2}$ ] + @xmath219 & @xmath220 & @xmath214 + @xmath221 \ , \nonumber \\ & & \label{gmeq}\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath222 and we include the effects of @xmath2 by replacing @xmath1 in eq . ( [ eq47 ] ) everywhere by @xmath223 . take @xmath224 to have components @xmath225 and @xmath226 to have components @xmath227 . then @xmath228 from this we find the spin - wave energy @xmath205 to be @xmath229 now take @xmath230 to have components @xmath231 , @xmath232 to have components @xmath233 , @xmath234 to have components @xmath235 , and @xmath236 to have components @xmath237 . in this subspace @xmath238 \ , \end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath239 , @xmath240 , and @xmath222 . thereby we find that the other two spin - wave energies , @xmath241 , are given by @xmath242 thus for zero wavevector we find the frequencies @xmath243 for the dm and cf models to be those given in table [ omega ] ( under the heading `` with canting '' ) . when @xmath72 is nonzero , we split the degeneracy between the two heretofore degenerate frequencies . this splitting is linear in @xmath72 . in contrast , when @xmath244 , the splitting between this two - fold degenerate mode and the other mode will be found to be of order @xmath245 , where @xmath246 involves anisotropic exchange or dm interactions . note that for @xmath247 , we have stability for @xmath248 , where @xmath249\ , \label{stable } \end{aligned}\ ] ] which is similar to elhajal et al@xcite who give @xmath250 . for @xmath251 , we have stability ( in the large @xmath252 limit ) if both @xmath253 and @xmath254 are positive , so that the @xmath29-axis is really the easiest axis . the x point is at @xmath255 \ , \ \ \ \ q_y = q_z=0 \\end{aligned}\ ] ] and the form factors are @xmath256 and @xmath257 | c | c | c || + & dm model & cf model + @xmath205 & @xmath258 & @xmath259 + & @xmath260^{1/2 } + { \cal o } ( d^{5/2}/j^{3/2})$ ] & @xmath261^{1/2 } + { \cal o}(c^{5/2}/j^{3/2})$ ] + @xmath208 & @xmath262- { 5 \sqrt 6 \over 4}d_z + { \cal o}(d^2/j)$ ] & @xmath262+{\sqrt 2 \over 2 } ( 2c_{x - z}+c_{y - z } ) + { \cal o}(c^2/j)$ ] + @xmath211 & @xmath263 & @xmath264 + + & dm model & cf model + @xmath205 & @xmath265^{1/2}$ ] & @xmath266^{1/2}$ ] + @xmath216 & @xmath262- { 5 \sqrt 6 \over 4}d_z + { \cal o}(d^2/j)$ ] & @xmath262 + { \sqrt 2 \over 2 } ( 2c_{x - z}+c_{y - z } ) + { \cal o}(c^2/j)$ ] + @xmath219 & @xmath267 & @xmath214 + thus the swdm is of the form @xmath268 \ , \end{aligned}\ ] ] where , to the same accuracy as before @xmath269 @xmath270/2 + j_2/2 - i \alpha_2 \ , \nonumber \\ & = & -{1 \over 4 } j_1 + { 1 \over 2 } j_2 - { \sqrt 3 \over 4 } d_z - { d_y^2 \over 4j_1 } \nonumber \\ & & \ - c_{yz}^2 /(12j_1 ) - { 3i \over 2 } { d_y j_2 \over j_1 } \nonumber \\ & & \ + i \sqrt 3 [ c_{yz } + 2(d_yd_z / j_1)]/6 \nonumber \\ & \equiv & a_{12}^\prime + i a_{12}^{\prime \prime}\end{aligned}\ ] ] @xmath271 and @xmath272 where we have neglected symmetric anisotropic exchange and only kept terms that seem to be most relevant . now we diagonalize the submatrices @xmath273 , @xmath274 , and @xmath275 . the eigenvectors of these 3 @xmath276 3 matrices are @xmath277 \ , \label{eigvec } \end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath278 , so that @xmath279 , @xmath280 , and @xmath281 . one can show that the vector given in eq . ( [ eigvec ] ) is an eigenvector of @xmath273 with the associated eigenvalue @xmath282 and is simultaneously an eigenvector of @xmath275 with eigenvalue @xmath283 the three spin - wave energies are given by @xmath284^{1/2 } \nonumber \\ & & \ + \left ( { a(\lambda ) - a(\lambda^ * ) \over 2 } \right ) \ .\end{aligned}\ ] ] so that @xmath285^{1/2 } \ , \tilde \omega_{\pm } & = & [ ( a_{11 } - a_{12}^\prime ) ^2 - ( b_{11 } - b_{12})^2]^{1/2 } \pm \sqrt 3 a_{12}^{\prime \prime } \ .\end{aligned}\ ] ] we thus find the spin - wave energies to be those given in table [ omegax ] . the y point is at @xmath286 , @xmath287 , so that @xmath288 , @xmath289 , @xmath290 , and @xmath291 . therefore the swdm at the y point is of the form @xmath292 \ , \end{aligned}\ ] ] | c | c | c || + & dm model & cf model + @xmath293 & @xmath294 & @xmath295 + & @xmath296^{1/2 } + { \cal o } ( d^{5/2}/j^{3/2})$ ] & @xmath297^{1/2 } + { \cal o}(c^{5/2}/j^{3/2})$ ] + @xmath298 & @xmath299 & @xmath300 + @xmath301 & @xmath302 & @xmath303 + + & dm model & cf model + @xmath293 & @xmath304^{1/2}$ ] & @xmath305 + & & @xmath306^{1/2}$ ] + @xmath307 & @xmath299 & @xmath308 + @xmath301 & @xmath302 & @xmath303 + where @xmath309 @xmath310 - j_2/2 + i \alpha_2 \ , \nonumber \\ & = & ( j_1 - j_2)/2 + { \sqrt 3 \over 2 } d_z + { d_y^2 \over 2j_1 } - { c_{yz}^2 \over 6j_1 } \nonumber \\ & & \ - i \sqrt 3 [ c_{yz } + 2(d_yd_z / j_1 ) - 2d_yj_2/j_1 ] /3 \nonumber \\ & \equiv & a_{12}^\prime + i a_{12}^{\prime \prime}\end{aligned}\ ] ] @xmath311 and @xmath312 one root for @xmath313 ( coming from rows and columns # 3 and # 6 ) is @xmath314 and the remaining eigenvalues come from the projection of the swdm , @xmath203 , into the remaining subspace : @xmath315 \ . \label{remain } \end{aligned}\ ] ] as usual , in our analytic work , we work to second order in the anisotropies , in the absence of which @xmath316 is real . in that case we have the unperturbed mode energies @xmath317 the perturbed ( i. e. for @xmath318 ) secular equation is @xmath319 [ \tilde \omega^2 - ( \tilde \omega_+^{(0)})^2 ] + ( a_{12}^{\prime \prime})^4 \nonumber \\ & & \ -2(a_{12}^{\prime \prime})^2 [ \tilde \omega^2 + a_{11}^2 - ( a_{12}^\prime)^2 -b_{11}^2 + b_{12}^2 ] \ .\end{aligned}\ ] ] thereby we find the approximate solutions @xmath320 } \nonumber \\ & & \ \times \biggl [ ( \tilde \omega_\pm^{(0)})^2 + a_{11}^2 - ( a_{12}^\prime)^2 - b_{11}^2 + b_{12}^2 \biggr ] \ .\end{aligned}\ ] ] in table [ omegay ] we give analytical results correct only to leading order in the anisotropies , in which case @xmath321 . recently matan _ et al._@xcite have measured spin - wave spectrum in fej using inelastic neutron scattering and here we discuss the comparison of our calculations with their results . the experimental spectrum@xcite shown in fig . [ spinwave_exp ] clearly indicates three spin - bands . one of these bands is quite dispersionless and it is therefore identified to be the zero - energy " mode , which is lifted to about 8 mev due to anisotropic magnetic interactions which we wish to identify . in addition to this lifted zero - energy mode " , the spectrum shows two additional gaps at 1.7 mev ( an in - plane mode ) and around 7 mev ( an out - of - plane mode ) . the spin - wave spectrum extends up to 20 mev at the x - point . it is of interest to develop a model hamiltonian which reproduces the observed spectrum . in particular , we will see that the observed energy splittings at the various high symmetry points provide sensitive constraints on the interaction parameters . in order to identify magnetic interactions in fej , in this section , we will present numerical calculations of the spin - wave spectrum for a large number of models and compare the results with the experimental data shown in fig . [ spinwave_exp ] . for a quantitative comparison we define an error - factor @xmath54 ( i.e. the goodness - of - fit ) as follows : @xmath322 where @xmath323 is the number of experimental data points , and @xmath324 and @xmath325 are respectively the experimental and calculated spin wave energies at wave - vector @xmath326 . one should recognize that @xmath54 describes the percentage error averaged over the entire spectrum . it is important to reproduce the splittings at the high symmetry points even though this only weakly affects the value of @xmath54 . model . in these and succeeding figures the values of the parameters of the fit are given in mev.,width=264 ] we start by comparing the experimental spectrum to a simple model where we consider only the isotropic nearest neighbor interaction @xmath1 and a non - zero @xmath31 in dm interaction vector ( i.e. @xmath327 ) . the best fit from this simple two - parameter model is shown in fig . the dm interaction with only the @xmath31 term lifts the zero - energy mode to the dispersionless energy @xmath328 , as observed experimentally . however this term alone can not give the experimentally observed small dispersion of this mode . without @xmath34 , we do not get any canting of spins either . the effect of the @xmath31 term is almost identical to an easy plane anisotropy . the lifted zero - energy mode " is found to be degenerate with the other spin gap ( _ i.e. _ the out - of - plane spin - gap ) at the @xmath35 point . however , we do not get the in - plane gap as experimentally observed at 1.7 mev . ( analytic results are given in table [ omega ] . ) the agreement between calculations and experiment can be improved significantly by turning on @xmath34 in the dm - vector as shown in fig . [ j1dydz ] . the main effect of @xmath34 term is to create a small in - plane anisotropy and therefore it can be adjusted to give an in - plane gap of 1.7 mev , as experimentally observed . this model gives three gaps at @xmath35 point , for which the analytic results are given in table [ omega ] . from these analytic results , one sees that the in - plane gap is proportional to @xmath329 and the small splitting between the flat - mode and the out - of - plane gap is equal to @xmath330 , which is quite small . although the experiment does not give clear results for the splittings of the high - energy modes at the x and y points , we see from table [ omegax ] that the splitting , @xmath246 , at the x point is expected to be quite small ( it is second order in the perturbations ) . table [ omegay ] indicates that the splitting of the high frequency modes at the y point is expected to be larger than at the x point . the @xmath34 term also causes the spins to be canted with a canting angle of about 2.5@xmath4 . however despite a significant improvement with the addition of @xmath34 term , we still do not get any dispersion to the flat mode in contradiction to the experimental finding . we also studied the single ion term @xmath194 and @xmath195 as given in eq . ( [ de_relation ] ) with only @xmath1 and obtained similar results . with only dm or single ion anisotropy without further neighbor interactions , it was not possible to obtain the small dispersion of the flat mode as experimentally observed . model . , width=264 ] in order to get the experimentally observed dispersion along with the correct average energy of the nearly flat mode , one needs to consider next - nearest neighbor interactions . in fig . [ j1j2 ] , we show the best fit from a simple isotropic nn ( @xmath1 ) and nnn ( @xmath2 ) interactions , which is in good agreement with the previous work.@xcite we note that the nnn @xmath2 interaction gives the zero - energy mode a significant dispersion . however in order to correctly reproduce the flat - mode energy requires a @xmath2 which gives too strong a dispersion . since the hamiltonian with isotropic @xmath1 and @xmath2 is rotationally invariant , we do not get any gap at the @xmath35 point , in contrast to experimentally observed three gaps . and @xmath2.,width=264 ] from above discussion , it is clear that one needs both a nnn @xmath2 interaction and either a dm or a single ion anisotropy . in fig . [ j1j2dydz ] , we show the best fit from a model which has the isotropic nn @xmath1 , nnn @xmath2 interactions and the dm vector @xmath331 . the fit to the data is very good . we reproduce not only the three gaps but also the small dispersion of the flat - mode . the spin gaps at the @xmath35 , x , and y points obtained numerically are in good agreement with the analytic results given in tables [ omega ] , [ omegax ] , and [ omegay ] . the spin - canting angle is about 2.1@xmath4 , in reasonable agreement with the experimentally estimated value of 1.5@xmath4.@xcite \(a ) and @xmath2 and ( a ) dm - vector @xmath331 and ( b ) single ion anisotropy terms @xmath194 and @xmath195 . , title="fig:",width=264 ] + ( b ) and @xmath2 and ( a ) dm - vector @xmath331 and ( b ) single ion anisotropy terms @xmath194 and @xmath195 . , title="fig:",width=264 ] as an alternative to dm interactions , one can also try to explain the experimental data based on a model which considers only the single ion anisotropies @xmath194 and @xmath195 as given in eq . ( [ de_relation]).@xcite in fig . [ j1j2dydz]b , we show the best fit from such a model which has an isotropic nn @xmath1 and nnn @xmath2 and the @xmath332 single ion anisotropy instead of the dm interactions . the r - factor for this fit is slightly larger than the r - factor obtained from dm interaction . the main differences are the larger splittings of the optical modes at the @xmath35 and x points and the smaller canting angle for the cf model in comparison to the dm model . the canting angle from the cf model is only 0.8@xmath4 , which is smaller than the experimental value@xcite of 1.5@xmath4 . the biggest problem with the cf model is the large gaps at the @xmath35 and x - points as shown in fig . [ j1j2dydz]b . the experimental splitting of the modes at these points are much smaller . numerical results give a splitting of about 0.75 mev at the @xmath35 point and 0.4 mev at the x - point . the splitting at the y - point is quite small . these results are in good agreement with the analytical results given in tables [ omegax ] and [ omegay ] . in conclusion , the observed spin - wave spectrum can be explained by a simple model which has only nearest and next - nearest isotropic interactions . the dm interaction gives the best fit to explain the observed gaps and the spin canting . even though the single ion terms also fit the data well , the quality of the fit is not as good as the one from dm term at the @xmath35 and x points . for the fe ion , the single ion anisotropy is expected to be smaller than the dm term ( because the single - ion term is second order in the spin - orbit coupling while the dm term appears in first order ) . for these reasons , we think that dm term is a natural source of anisotropy in fej compound , which not only stabilizes the observed experimental spin structure but also gives the right spin - wave spectrum with the proper gaps and dispersion . here we give results when the transformation to the canted structure is omitted , i.e. @xmath99 is forced to be zero . one purpose of giving these results is to show the importance of making this transformation when calculating the gaps in the spectrum which depend on small perturbations . also , we could check our calculations by comparing these results to those of nishiyama et al@xcite who omitted this transformation . when one distorts a collinear spin structure by the application of a small transverse field , the effects on the spectrum are second order in the distortion angle . here , however , the situation is different because the spins before distortion are noncollinear . as a result of this noncollinearity the matrix element @xmath333 in eq . ( [ effsw ] ) ( which would be zero for a collinear system ) is of order @xmath252 . thus the matrix element @xmath334 in eq.([tilde ] ) has a contribution , @xmath335 , induced by canting of the same order as that , @xmath336 , which existed before canting . this fact indicates that canting should not be ignored in the calculation of the spin - wave spectrum . to obtain results when canting is ignored we replace quantities with overbars in eq . ( [ tilde ] ) by the corresponding quantities without overbars . here ( where @xmath252 denotes @xmath223 ) @xmath337 @xmath338 @xmath339 @xmath340 @xmath341 then , when the anisotropy in @xmath140 is neglected , we find the frequencies listed in table [ omega ] under the heading `` neglecting canting . '' the treatment including canting is now modified so that @xmath342/2 + j_2/2 - i \alpha_2 \nonumber \\ & = & -j_1/4 + j_2/2 - \sqrt 3 d_z/4 -i d_y/2 \ , \nonumber \\ b_{11 } & = & c_{xx}-c_{yy } \ , \nonumber \\ b_{12}&= & -b_1/2 - 3j_2/2 \nonumber \\ & = & 3j_1/4 -3j_2/2 - \sqrt 3 d_z/4 \ .\end{aligned}\ ] ] then we find the spin - wave frequencies as listed in table [ omegax ] . now we have @xmath343 so that the frequencies are those given in table [ omegay ] . unless the only anisotropy is due to @xmath34 , these results are the same as those given in table [ omegay ] with canting , so that , except for this case , the effect of canting at the y point is very small . the effect of canting can be deduced from the epxressions for the matrix elemets given in appendix c. one sees that the rotation to the canted spin structure induces terms of the form @xmath344 into the swdm matrix elements . also the quantity @xmath345 is transformed ( by the rotation to the canted system of coordinates ) from the value @xmath34 ( neglecting the anisotropy in @xmath140 ) to @xmath346 . suprprisingly perhaps , this rotation through an angle of order @xmath347 also introduces a contribution to @xmath348 of order @xmath349 . a qualitative understanding of what is going on here is obtained by noting that the coefficient @xmath350 is associated with an interaction proportional to @xmath351 , where the components are taken in the `` final '' _ i. e. _ canted coordinate system . this term directly affects the spin - wave energies . this term arises from rotating an interaction in the local uncanted coordinate system of the form @xmath352 , a term which for collinear systems is zero , but for this noncollinear system is of order @xmath1 , as given in eq . ( [ param ] ) . since these quantities control several of the splittings , it is clear that neglecting canting can have a major impact on these splittings , as shown in fig . [ no_canting ] and the tables . from fig . [ j1j2dydz](a ) , it is clear that the quality of the fit is significantly degraded for the dm term , in particular at the @xmath35 and @xmath36-points where big gaps are opened . \(a ) + ( b ) the effect of neglecting canting is opposite for the cf term . the quality of the fit is improved because the large splitting at @xmath35 ( see fig . [ j1j2dydz](b ) ) is now zero ( fig . [ no_canting](b ) ) . for instance , for zero wavevector the splitting @xmath353 ( given by @xmath354 ) is linear in @xmath34 when canting is neglected , whereas when the canting was taken into account the splitting was found to be proportional to @xmath355 . to calculate this splitting it is therefore not qualitatively correct to ignore the canting . in addition , when canting is ignored and single - ion anisotropy is not present , neglecting canting leads to @xmath356 , even when @xmath124 is nonzero . at the x point the effects of canting are similar . for the low energy mode the transformation to the canted structure introduces a term proportional to @xmath357 which is only important if all the other anisotropies are very small or vanishing . however , as table [ omegax ] indicates , the splitting between @xmath358 is proportional to @xmath34 when canting is neglected , but is proportional to @xmath359 when canting is taken into account . at the y point the effects of canting are less important . indeed @xmath360 and @xmath361 are insensitive to canting and only in @xmath362 does one see that canting introduces a term of order @xmath357 . in conclusion , it is important that one should not ignore the spin - canting when spin - wave spectrum is calculated . even though the cf single ion term gives much better fit when the canting is ignored ( see figs . [ j1j2dydz ] and [ no_canting ] ) , it is not an appropriate approximation , as we have shown . when the cf single ion term is properly treated , it actually gives a worse fit to the data and therefore it is more logical to conclude that the dominant source of the anisotropy in fej compound is the dm term . we have presented a detailed study of the magnetic structure and spin - wave spectrum in fej for the most generic nn and nnn exchange interactions including dzyaloshinskii - moriya and the single ion anisotropy terms of inami _ et al._@xcite our conclusions can be summarized as follows . * we first discuss the allowed magnetic structures from a representations analysis . the experimentally observed umbrella " structure of * q*=0 with positive chirality arises from a one dimensional representation which exhibits three - fold symmetry . our analysis and discussion of broken symmetry suggests that the characterization by irreducible representations is more fundamental than that by chirality , even though chirality has been widely invoked in the literature . * representation analysis reveals the existence of an @xmath46-@xmath47-like two dimensional representation which has sixth order in - plane anisotropy . in this representation one can have kagom layers with a net in - plane moment which can be stacked either ferromagnetically or antiferromagnetically . the analysis of ref . did not find wavefunctions of this type . however , the observed magnetic ground state of a nav - jarosite@xcite consists of such ferromagnetic kagom planes which are coupled antiferromagnetically . * we presented detailed spin - wave calculations for the most generic spin hamiltonian allowed by symmetry . we derived analytic expressions for the spin - wave energies at the @xmath35 , @xmath36 , and @xmath37 points in the brillouin zone . the agreement between our analytic and numerical results tends to support the correctness of both approaches . since , the spectrum is invariant under a change of sign of @xmath34 , the sign of this parameter remains undetermined by experiment . * we obtained the spin - wave spectrum numerically throughout the brillouin zone for a large number of models with increasing complexity and compared the results with the recent experimental data.@xcite we obtained a nn exchange constant of @xmath363 mev , which is in good agreement with previous measurements.@xcite we found that the observed small dispersion can be explained by a nnn isotropic interaction of @xmath364 . the observed gaps at the @xmath35 , @xmath36 , and @xmath37 points are best explained by considering only the dm interaction with @xmath365 mev and @xmath366 mev together with nn and nnn interactions . the d@xmath367 term is adjusted to lift the zero - energy mode to about 8 mev with a small dispersion due to @xmath2 interaction . a fit of similar quality can also be obtained using the crystal field ( cf ) model of ref . but the resulting anisotropy is about 10% of @xmath1 , too large a value for the s state fe@xmath11 ion which is supposed to be quite isotropic . the calculated canting angle is 2.07@xmath4 and 0.77@xmath4 for dm and cf models , respectively , compared to the experimentally deduced value@xcite of @xmath368 . * finally we discuss the effect of the canting on the spin - wave quantization axis which was neglected by inami _ et al._@xcite we found that neglecting canting is not a good approximation for calculating the spin - wave energy gaps at the high symmetry points in the brillouin zone . when the cf is treated properly , it gives larger gaps at the @xmath35 point than those from dm interaction . the experiment does not indicate significant splitting at the @xmath35 point and therefore it suggests that the dm term works better to explain the data . * acknowledgement : * we thank k. matan and y. s. lee for many fruitful discussions and for sharing their spin - wave data prior to publication . to construct the boson hamiltonian it is convenient to introduce spherical components ( @xmath369 , @xmath370 ) for interactions between site @xmath51 in unit cell @xmath130 located at @xmath371 and site @xmath372 in unit cell @xmath373 located at @xmath374 . if these sites are @xmath75th nearest neighbors , then we write @xmath375 \nonumber \\ \overline{\cal i}^{\pm \mp}_{\tau \tau'}(i , j ) & = & { 1 \over 4 } [ \overline { \cal i}_{xx}^{(n ) } \pm i \overline { \cal i}_{xy}^{(n ) } \mp \overline { \cal i}_{yx}^{(n ) } + \overline { \cal i}_{yy}^{(n ) } ] \end{aligned}\ ] ] and similarly for the single - ion anisotropy matrix @xmath376 . now we invoke the holstein - primakoff transformation in the form @xmath377 then apart from a constant the hamiltonian in terms of bose operators is @xmath378 \nonumber \\ & & \ + s { \sum_{i \tau , j \tau'}}^\prime \biggl [ - { 1 \over 2 } \overline { \cal i}_{\tau \tau'}^{zz}(i , j ) ( a_{i \tau}^\dagger a_{i \tau } + a_{j \tau'}^\dagger a_{j \tau ' } ) \nonumber \\ & & \ + \overline{\cal i}_{\tau \tau'}^{++ } ( i , j ) a_{i \tau } a_{j\tau ' } + \overline{\cal i}_{\tau \tau'}^{-- } ( i , j ) a_{i \tau}^\dagger a_{j\tau'}^\dagger \nonumber \\ & & \ + \overline{\cal i}_{\tau \tau'}^{+- } ( i , j ) a_{i \tau } a_{j\tau'}^\dagger + \overline{\cal i}_{\tau \tau'}^{-+ } ( i , j ) a_{i \tau}^\dagger a_{j\tau ' } \biggr ] \ , \end{aligned}\ ] ] where the prime on the summation excludes the term with @xmath379 . now write @xmath380 so that @xmath381 where @xmath382 is the ground state energy and @xmath383 where @xmath384 \delta_{\tau , \tau ' } + \overline { \cal i}^{+-}_{\tau ' \tau}({\bf q } ) + \overline { \cal i}^{-+}_{\tau \tau'}(-{\bf q } ) \biggr ) \nonumber \\ & = & \biggl ( [ c_{xx } + \overline c_{yy } - 2\overline c_{zz } - \sum_{\tau '' } \overline { \cal i}_{\tau,\tau''}^{zz } ( q=0 ) ] \delta_{\tau , \tau ' } \nonumber \\ & & \ + \overline { \cal i}^{+-}_{\tau ' \tau}({\bf q } ) + \overline { \cal i}^{-+}_{\tau \tau'}(-{\bf q } ) \biggr ) \nonumber \\ \label{adef } \end{aligned}\ ] ] @xmath385 \delta_{\tau,\tau ' } + 2 \overline { \cal i}_{\tau \tau'}^{--}(-{\bf q } ) \ , \label{bdef } \end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath386 where @xmath387 and the superscripts assume the values @xmath388 , @xmath389 , and @xmath29 . since each site is a center of inversion symmetry , the exponential factor in the sum over @xmath130 in eq . ( [ gammaeq ] ) can be replaced by a cosine : @xmath390 \label{coseq } \end{aligned}\ ] ] and @xmath391 is an even function of @xmath32 . if @xmath392 is a vector of the reciprocal lattice ( such that @xmath393 is a multiple of @xmath394 ) , then @xmath395 \nonumber \\ b_{\tau \tau'}({\bf q } + { \bf g } ) & = & b_{\tau \tau'}({\bf q } ) e^{i { \bf g } \cdot ( \tauv'-\tauv)}\nonumber \\ & = & b_{\tau \tau'}({\bf q } ) \cos [ { \bf g } \cdot ( \tauv'-\tau ) ] \ . \label{gvec } \end{aligned}\ ] ] here we used the fact that for the kagom lattice , the @xmath396 s are half a lattice vector , so that @xmath397= \pm 1 $ ] . we write the normal mode operators as @xmath398 \ , \end{aligned}\ ] ] and these are determined by @xmath399 = \omega^{(\mu ) } ( { \bf q } ) x^\dagger_\mu({\bf q } ) \ . \label{modeeq } \end{aligned}\ ] ] if there are @xmath82 spins per unit cell , then we expect that @xmath82 of the @xmath400 will be nonnegative and @xmath82 will be nonpositive . equation ( [ modeeq ] ) gives @xmath401 \nonumber \\ & = & \sum_{\alpha , \beta } \biggl [ c_\alpha^\mu ( { \bf q } ) a_{\beta , \alpha}({\bf q } ) a_\beta^\dagger ( { \bf q } ) + c_\alpha^\mu ( { \bf q } ) b_{\alpha , \beta}^*({\bf q } ) a_\beta(-{\bf q } ) \biggr ] \nonumber \\ & & \ \ - \sum_{\alpha , \beta } \biggl [ d_\alpha^\mu ( { \bf q } ) a_{\alpha , \beta}(-{\bf q } ) a_\beta(-{\bf q } ) \nonumber \\ & & \ + d_\alpha^\mu ( { \bf q } ) b_{\alpha , \beta}(-{\bf q } ) a_\beta^\dagger({\bf q } ) \biggr ] \ , \end{aligned}\ ] ] where again @xmath402 . this leads to the eigenvalue problem @xmath403 \nonumber \\ \tilde \omega^{(\mu ) } ( { \bf q } ) d_\alpha^\mu ( { \bf q } ) & = & \sum_\beta [ b_{\beta , \alpha}({\bf q})^ * c_\beta^\mu ( { \bf q } ) - a_{\beta , \alpha } ( -{\bf q } ) d_\beta^\mu ( { \bf q } ) ] \ , \end{aligned}\ ] ] which can be written as @xmath404 \left [ \begin{array } { c } { \bf c}^\mu ( { \bf q } ) \\ { \bf d}^\mu ( { \bf q } ) \\ \end{array } \right ] & = & \tilde \omega^{(\mu ) } ( { \bf q } ) \left [ \begin{array } { c } { \bf c}^\mu({\bf q } ) \\ { \bf d}^\mu ( { \bf q } ) \\ \end{array } \right ] \ , \end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath405 is a column vector with components @xmath406 , @xmath407 , @xmath408 , @xmath409 , where @xmath86 is the number of spins in the unit cell . we now note that because the hamiltonian is hermitian and taking account of inversion symmetry , we have @xmath410 similarly we write @xmath411 thus the eigenvalue problem is @xmath412 \left [ \begin{array } { c } { \bf c}^\mu ( { \bf q } ) \\ { \bf d}^\mu ( { \bf q } ) \\ \end{array } \right ] & = & \tilde \omega^{(\mu ) } ( { \bf q } ) \left [ \begin{array } { c } { \bf c}^\mu({\bf q } ) \\ { \bf d}^\mu ( { \bf q } ) \\ \end{array } \right ] \ . \label{meq } \end{aligned}\ ] ] we now show that the roots come in pairs with opposite signs . equation ( [ meq ] ) is @xmath413 take the complex conjugate of these equations , change the signs of both sides of each equations , and reorder the equations to get @xmath414^ * - { \bf b } [ { \bf c}^\mu]^ * & = & - \tilde \omega^{(\mu ) } [ { \bf d}^\mu]^ * \nonumber \\ { \bf b}^ * [ { \bf d}^\mu]^ * - { \bf a}^ * [ { \bf c}^\mu]^ * & = & - \tilde \omega^{(\mu ) } [ { \bf c}^\mu]^ * \ , \end{aligned}\ ] ] where we used the fact that the @xmath243 s are real . this shows that from an eigenvector with eigenvalue @xmath415 we can construct a related eigenvector with eigenvalue @xmath416 . one can show that the eigenvalues at wavevector @xmath32 are identical to those at wavevector @xmath417 , as expected in view of the inversion symmetry of the lattice . thus we may write @xmath418 \left [ \begin{array } { c c } { \bf c}({\bf q } ) & { \bf d}({\bf q})^ * \\ { \bf d}({\bf q } ) & { \bf c}({\bf q})^ * \\ \end{array } \right ] \nonumber \\ & = & \left [ \begin{array } { c c } { \bf c}({\bf q } ) & { \bf d}({\bf q})^ * \\ { \bf d}({\bf q } ) & { \bf c}({\bf q})^ * \\ \end{array } \right ] \left [ \begin{array } { c c } \tilde \omegav ( { \bf q } ) & 0 \\ 0 & - \tilde \omegav ( { \bf q } ) \\ \end{array } \right ] \ , \label{54eq } \end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath419 and @xmath420 are matrices whose columns are the column vectors @xmath421 and @xmath422 , respectively , and @xmath423 is a diagonal matrix with entries @xmath424 . recall the dependence of the matrices on the reciprocal lattice vector as recorded in eq . ( [ gvec ] ) . then the eigenvalue problem at wavevector @xmath425 may be written in the form @xmath426 e^{i{\bf g } \cdot ( \tauv_\beta - \tauv_\alpha ) } \nonumber \\ & & \tilde \omega^{(\mu ) } ( { \bf q}+{\bf g } ) d_\alpha^\mu ( { \bf q}+{\bf g } ) = \sum_\beta [ b_{\beta , \alpha}({\bf q})^ * c_\beta^\mu ( { \bf q}+{\bf g } ) \nonumber \\ & & \ - a_{\beta , \alpha } ( -{\bf q } ) d_\beta^\mu ( { \bf q}+{\bf g } ) ] e^{i{\bf g } \cdot ( \tauv_\beta - \tauv_\alpha ) } \ .\end{aligned}\ ] ] set @xmath427 and @xmath428 then we recover the previous equations . so we conclude that under addition of @xmath392 , the eigenvalues remain invariant , but the wavefunctions change according to eq . ( [ gtrans ] ) . taking the hermitian conjugate of eigenvalue equations , we get @xmath429 so that @xmath430 \left [ \begin{array } { c c } { \bf a}({\bf q } ) & - { \bf b}({\bf q } ) \\ { \bf b}({\bf q})^ * & -{\bf a } ( { \bf q})^ * \\ \end{array } \right ] \nonumber \\ & & \ = \tilde \omega^{(\mu ) } ( { \bf q } ) \left [ \begin{array } { c } { \bf c}^\mu({\bf q})^\dagger \ , - { \bf d}^\mu ( { \bf q})^\dagger \end{array } \right ] \ .\end{aligned}\ ] ] thus from any right solution we have constructed the associated left solution . now consider @xmath431 \left [ \begin{array } { c c } { \bf a}({\bf q } ) & - { \bf b}({\bf q } ) \\ { \bf b}({\bf q})^ * & -{\bf a } ( { \bf q})^ * \\ \end{array } \right ] \nonumber \\ & & \ \times \left [ \begin{array } { c } c^\nu ( { \bf q } ) \\ d^\nu ( { \bf q } ) \\ \end{array } \right ] \ .\end{aligned}\ ] ] using the fact that the left and right vectors are eigenvectors , we have @xmath432 \left [ \begin{array } { c } c^\nu ( { \bf q } ) \\ d^\nu ( { \bf q } ) \\ \end{array } \right ] \nonumber \\ & = & \tilde \omega^{(\nu ) } ( { \bf q } ) \left [ \begin{array } { c } { \bf c}^\mu({\bf q})^\dagger \ , - { \bf d}^\mu({\bf q})^\dagger \end{array } \right ] \left [ \begin{array } { c } c^\nu ( { \bf q } ) \\ d^\nu ( { \bf q } ) \\ \end{array } \right ] \ .\end{aligned}\ ] ] if @xmath433 this shows that @xmath434 is real . also @xmath435 \left [ \begin{array } { c } c^\nu ( { \bf q } ) \\ d^\nu ( { \bf q } ) \\ \end{array } \right ] = 0 , \ \ \mu \not= \nu \ .\end{aligned}\ ] ] ( if we have degenerate eigenvalues , we can choose the wavefunctions to preserve this orthogonality . ) a more general orthogonality is @xmath436 \left [ \begin{array } { c c } { \bf c}({\bf q } ) & { \bf d}({\bf q})^ * \\ { \bf d}({\bf q } ) & { \bf c}({\bf q})^ * \\ \end{array } \right ] & = & { \cal i } \ , \end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath437 is the @xmath438 unit matrix . we have the transformation to normal modes as @xmath398 \ , \label{nego } \end{aligned}\ ] ] and also @xmath439 \ , \end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath440 is restricted so that @xmath441 . we require that @xmath442 obey bose commutation relations : @xmath443 = \delta_{\mu,\nu } \ .\end{aligned}\ ] ] this gives @xmath444 the inverse transformation is @xmath445 \ , \nonumber \\ a_\alpha ( { \bf q } ) & = & \sum_\mu [ c_\alpha^\mu({\bf q } ) x_\mu({\bf q } ) - d_\alpha^\mu ( { \bf q})^ * x_\mu ( -{\bf q})^\dagger ] \ .\end{aligned}\ ] ] we record here the dependence on reciprocal lattice vector : @xmath446 e^{i{\bf g } \cdot \tauv_\alpha } \ , \nonumber \\ a_\alpha ( { \bf q}+{\bf g } ) & = & \sum_\mu [ c_\alpha^\mu({\bf q } ) x_\mu({\bf q } ) - d_\alpha^\mu ( { \bf q})^ * x_\mu ( -{\bf q})^\dagger ] e^{-i{\bf g } \cdot \tauv_\alpha } \ .\end{aligned}\ ] ] to use this we would assume that @xmath32 is in the first brillouin zone and @xmath392 is the vector needed to bring the actual wavevector back into the first brillouin zone . we now develop explicit expressions for the constants appearing in these matrices . we use eq . ( [ tilde ] ) to relate the overlined coefficients to the bare coefficients , which are defined in eqs . ( [ cdef ] ) and ( [ param ] ) . we will work to second order in the perturbations from isotropic exchange . to this order @xmath447 and @xmath448 where @xmath158 and @xmath449 are given in eq . ( [ hyzeq ] ) , so that @xmath450 } \ , \label{zeq } \end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath451 then @xmath452 equation ( [ tilde ] ) gives @xmath453 then , keeping only relevant anisotropy corrections , we find that the constants in eq . ( [ nmataeq ] ) and ( [ nmatbeq ] ) are @xmath454 \cos ( 2 \theta ) \nonumber \\ & & \ - [ 4e_{yz}^{(1)}+3c_{yz } ] \sin ( 2 \theta ) \nonumber \\ & = & \delta + { 3 \over 2 } j_{xx } - { 1 \over 2 } j_{yy } - 2 j_{zz } - \sqrt 3 d_z \nonumber \\ & & \ + \biggl [ { 3 \over 2 } j_{xx } - { 1 \over 2 } j_{yy } + 2 j_{zz } - \sqrt 3 d_z \biggr]\nonumber \\ & & \ \times \biggl [ 1 - { 2[j_{yz } - c_{yz } - \sqrt 3 d_y]^2 \over 9j_1 ^ 2 } \biggr ] \nonumber \\ & & - { 1 \over 3j_1 } \biggl [ 4\sqrt 3 d_y - 4j_{yz } + 6 c_{yz } \biggr ] \biggl [ j_{yz } - c_{yz } - \sqrt 3 d_y \biggr ] \nonumber \\ & = & 2j + \delta + { 5 \over 6 } \delta_j + { 3 \over 2 } \eta_j - 2 \sqrt 3 d_z \nonumber \\ & & \ + { 2 \over 3j_1 } [ j_{yz } - c_{yz } - \sqrt 3 d_y][j_{yz } - \sqrt 3 d_y - 2 c_{yz } ] \ , \nonumber \\ % % a_1 & = & - e_x^{(1 ) } - \overline e_y^{(1)}\nonumber \\ & = & - e_x^{(1 ) } - [ e_z^{(1 ) } + e_y^{(1)}]/2\nonumber \\ & & \ - { 1 \over 2 } [ e_y^{(1 ) } - e_z^{(1 ) } ] \cos ( 2 \theta ) - e_{yz}^{(1 ) } \sin ( 2 \theta ) \nonumber \\ & = & { 1 \over 4 } j_{xx } - { 3 \over 4 } j_{yy } + { \sqrt 3 \over 2 } d_z - { 3 \over 8 } j_{xx}\nonumber \\ & & \ + { 1 \over 8 } j_{yy } + { 1 \over 2 } j_{zz } + { \sqrt 3 \over 4 } d_z \nonumber \\ & & \ + \biggl [ { 1 \over 2 } j_{zz } + { 3 \over 8 } j_{xx } - { 1 \over 8 } j_{yy } - { \sqrt 3 \over 4 } d_z \biggr ] \nonumber \\ & & \ \times \biggl [ 1 - { 2[j_{yz } - c_{yz } - \sqrt 3 d_y]^2 \over 9j_1 ^ 2 } \biggr ] \nonumber \\ & & \ - { 1 \over 3j_1 } [ \sqrt 3 d_y - j_{yz } ] [ j_{yz } - c_{yz } - \sqrt 3 d_y ] \nonumber \\ & = & { 1 \over 2 } j_1 - { 3 \over 8 } \eta_j + { 11 \over 24 } \delta_j + { \sqrt 3 \over 2 } d_z \nonumber \\ & & \ + { 1 \over 6j_1 } \biggl [ j_{yz } - c_{yz } - \sqrt 3 d_y \biggr ] \biggl [ - \sqrt 3 d_y + j_{yz } + c_{yz } \biggr ] \ , \nonumber \\ % % b_0 & = & c_{xx}- \overline c_{yy } \ , \nonumber \\ & = & c_{xx } - { 1 \over 2 } \biggl [ c_{yy } + c_{zz } \biggr ] + { 1 \over 2 } \biggl [ c_{zz}-c_{yy } \biggr ] \cos ( 2 \theta ) \nonumber \\ & & \ + c_{yz } \sin ( 2\theta ) \nonumber \\ & = & c_{xx}-c_{yy } + { 2c_{yz } \over 3j_1 } [ j_{yz } - c_{yz } - \sqrt 3 d_y ] \ , % % \nonumber \\ b_1 & = & - e_x^{(1 ) } + \overline e_y^{(1 ) } \nonumber \\ & = & -e_x^{(1 ) } + { 1 \over 2 } \biggl [ e_y^{(1 ) } + e_z^{(1 ) } \biggr ] + e_{yz}^{(1 ) } \sin ( 2 \theta ) \nonumber \\ & & \ + { 1 \over 2 } \biggl [ e_y^{(1)}-e_z^{(1 ) } \biggr ] \cos ( 2 \theta ) \nonumber \\ & = & { 5 \over 8 } j_{xx } - { 7 \over 8 } j_{yy } - { 1 \over 2 } j_{zz } + { \sqrt 3 \over 4 } d_z \nonumber \\ & & \ - { 1 \over 2 } \biggl [ j_{zz } + { 3 \over 4 } j_{xx } - { 1 \over 4 } j_{yy } - { \sqrt 3 \over 2 } d_z \biggr ] \nonumber \\ & & \ \times \biggl [ 1 - { 2[j_{yz } - c_{yz } - \sqrt 3 d_y]^2 \over 9j_1 ^ 2 } \biggr ] \nonumber \\ & & \ + { 1 \over 3j_1 } [ \sqrt 3 d_y - j_{yz } ] [ j_{yz } - c_{yz } - \sqrt 3 d_y ] \nonumber \\ & = & - { 3 \over 2 } j_1 + { 5 \over 8 } \eta_j + { 1 \over 8 } \delta_j + { \sqrt 3 \over 2 } d_z\nonumber \\ & & \ + { [ j_{yz}-c_{yz } - \sqrt 3 d_y ] \over 6j } [ \sqrt 3 d_y - j_{yz } - c_{yz } ] \ , \nonumber \\ % % \alpha^{(1 ) } & = & 2 \overline d_z^{(1 ) } = 2d_z^{(1 ) } \cos \theta + 2d_y^{(1 ) } \sin \theta \nonumber \\ & = & 2d_z^{(1 ) } + d_y^{(1 ) } \sin ( 2 \theta ) \nonumber \\ & = & -(d_y + \sqrt 3 j_{yz } ) \cos \theta \nonumber \\ & + & \left(- \sqrt 3 j_1 - d_z + { \sqrt 3 \delta_j \over 12 } - { \sqrt 3 \eta_j \over 4 } \right ) \sin \theta \ .\end{aligned}\ ] ] but using eq . ( [ zeq ] ) this gives @xmath455 \left [ - \sqrt 3 j_1 - d_z + { \sqrt 3 \delta_j \over 12 } - { \sqrt 3 \eta_j \over 4 } \right ] \nonumber \\ & = & - { 4 \sqrt 3 \over 3 } j_{yz } + { c_{yz } \over \sqrt 3 } + { j_{yz } - c_{yz } - \sqrt 3 d_y \over 3 \sqrt 3 j_1 } \nonumber \\ & & \ \times \left [ \delta_j - \eta_j - 2 \sqrt 3 d_z + c_{y - x } + 3j_2 \right ] \ . \label{alphaeq } \end{aligned}\ ] ] also @xmath456 \ . \label{alphaeq2 } \end{aligned}\ ] ] we first define the green s function @xmath457 \ .\end{aligned}\ ] ] then we will need the frequency and wave vector dependent susceptibility given by @xmath458 in terms of which the dynamical structure factor is @xmath459 \ , \end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath460^{-1}$ ] . we have that @xmath461 n(\omega ) \nonumber \\ & = & \sum_{m , n } \biggl\ { p_n \delta(\omega - e_m + e_n ) \langle n|{\cal s}^{\alpha } ( { \bf q } ) |m \rangle \langle m| { \cal s}^{\beta } ( -{\bf q})|n \rangle \nonumber \\ & & \ \ - p_m \delta(\omega + e_n - e_m ) \langle m|{\cal s}^{\beta } ( -{\bf q } ) |n \rangle \langle n| { \cal s}^{\alpha } ( { \bf q})|m \rangle \biggr\ } n(\omega ) \nonumber \\ & = & \sum_{m , n } p_n \delta(\omega - e_m + e_n ) [ 1 - e^{-\beta(e_m - e_n ) } ] n(\omega ) \nonumber \\ & & \ \ \times \langle n|{\cal s}^{\alpha } ( { \bf q } ) |m \rangle \langle m| { \cal s}^{\beta } ( -{\bf q})|n \rangle \nonumber \\ & = & \sum_{m , n } p_n \delta(\omega - e_m + e_n ) { 1 - e^{-\beta(e_m - e_n ) } ] \over e^{\beta(e_m - e_n ) } -1 } \nonumber \\ & & \ \ \times \langle n|{\cal s}^{\alpha } ( { \bf q } ) |m \rangle \langle m| { \cal s}^{\beta } ( -{\bf q})|n \rangle \nonumber \\ & = & \sum_{m , n } p_m \delta(\omega - e_m + e_n ) \langle n|{\cal s}^{\alpha } ( { \bf q } ) |m \rangle \langle m| { \cal s}^{\beta } ( -{\bf q})|n \rangle \ .\end{aligned}\ ] ] we write @xmath462 where the subscript @xmath463 indicates a component with respect to the local canted axes . then , to linear order in the bose operators we have @xmath464 \nonumber \\ & = & \sqrt { s \over 2 n } \sum_{\tauv , { \bf r } } e^{i { \bf q } \cdot ( \tauv + { \bf r } ) } \nonumber \\ & & \ \times \biggl ( { \cal r}_{\alpha x } ( \tau ) [ a({\bf r } , \tauv ) + a^\dagger({\bf r } , \tauv ) ] \nonumber \\ & & \ \ -i { \cal r}_{\alpha y } ( \tau ) [ a({\bf r } , \tauv ) - a^\dagger({\bf r } , \tauv ) ] \biggr ) \ .\end{aligned}\ ] ] now set @xmath465 then @xmath466 \nonumber \\ & = & \sqrt{s \over 2 } \sum_\tauv \biggl [ \gamma_\alpha ( \tau ) a^\dagger_\tau ( { \bf q } ) + \gamma_\alpha ( \tau)^ * a_\tau ( -{\bf q } ) \biggr ] \nonumber \\ & = & \sqrt{s \over 2 } \sum_{\tauv \mu } \biggl [ \gamma_\alpha ( \tau ) \biggl ( c^{(\mu)}_\tau ( { \bf q})^ * x_\mu^\dagger ( { \bf q } ) - d_\tau^{(\mu ) } ( { \bf q } ) x_\mu(-{\bf q})\biggr ) \nonumber \\ & & \ \ + \gamma_\alpha ( \tau)^ * \biggl ( c_\tau^{(\mu)}(-{\bf q } ) x_\mu(-{\bf q } ) - d_\tau^{(\mu ) } ( -{\bf q})^ * x_\mu^\dagger ( { \bf q})\biggr ) \biggr ] \nonumber \\ & = & \sqrt{s \over 2 } \sum_{\tauv \mu } \biggl [ \biggl ( \gamma_\alpha ( \tau ) c_\tau^{(\mu)}({\bf q})^ * - \gamma_\alpha(\tau)^ * d_\tau^{(\mu ) } ( { \bf q})^ * \biggr ) x_\mu^\dagger ( { \bf q } ) \nonumber \\ & & \ \ + \biggl ( \gamma_\alpha ( \tau)^ * c_\tau^{(\mu)}({\bf q } ) - \gamma_\alpha(\tau ) d_\tau^{(\mu ) } ( { \bf q } ) \biggr ) x_\mu(-{\bf q } ) \biggr ] \ .\end{aligned}\ ] ] Abstract:

Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.

Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered . Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video . Paper: the ads / cft correspondence @xcite@xcite@xcite implies that type iib string theory in @xmath7 is equivalent to @xmath2 super - yang - mills in four dimensions . in the classical string theory limit , or equivalently in the planar gauge theory limit , integrable structures appear . this has lead to impressive progress in the understanding of this system ( see @xcite for a review ) . the ads / cft dictionary relates the energy of string states in the bulk to the conformal dimensions of operators on the boundary . a set of equations known as the y - system has been put forward in @xcite to solve the spectrum problem of planar @xmath2 sym , or equivalently of string theory in @xmath7 . the goal of the present article is to make a new step towards a definite proof of the validity of this set of equations . there is by now solid evidence in favor of the validity of the y - system . it reproduces the results of the asymptotic bethe ansatz @xcite , but it does not suffer from the same limitations . for instance it contains @xcite@xcite the spectrum of the quasi - classical string at large t hooft coupling ( see e.g. @xcite ) . even more impressively , it lead to correct predictions for the dimension of the konishi operator both at large @xcite and at small @xcite t hooft coupling . in order to claim that the spectrum problem for @xmath2 sym has been definitively solved , it would be comfortable to have a proof of the validity of the y - system . at that point the only known derivation of the y - system relies on the thermodynamic bethe ansatz @xcite ( see e.g. @xcite for a review ) . this approach was studied in @xcite@xcite@xcite . the thermodynamic bethe ansatz has been very successful and lead to numerous remarkable results . however this method relies on several crucial assumptions . in the first place , one has to assume quantum integrability of the theory . then one needs the `` string hypothesis '' : the spectrum of excitations that contribute to the thermodynamic limit of the theory essentially has to be guessed . most importantly , this method only gives the ground state energy . the spectrum of excited state can be obtained by analytic continuation , but the reason why this works is not understood . in this paper , we will initiate a different approach to derive the y - system from first principles . we will use only elementary tools of two dimensional conformal field theory ; in this aspect this article can be related to the seminal work of @xcite where the y - system was derived for the minimal models . we will be able to prove the validity of the y - system up to first non - trivial order at large t hooft coupling . [ [ the - idea - of - the - proof . ] ] the idea of the proof . + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + up to a change of variables , the y - system can be rewritten as a t - system , also known as the hirota equation : [ tsystem ] _ a , s(u + 1 ) _ a , s(u - 1 ) = _ a+1,s(u+1)_a-1,s(u-1 ) + _ a , s+1(u-1)_a , s-1(u+1 ) in the above equation , @xmath8 is a spectral parameter and the indices @xmath9 are integers that label representations of the global symmetry group of the system . in the case at hand this group is @xmath10 . these labels take values in a t - shaped lattice . more details are given in section [ prooftsys ] . the t - functions are expected to be related to special line operators of the string worldsheet theory , namely the transfer matrices ( see e.g. @xcite ) . the transfer matrices play a central role in the study of classical integrability . indeed these operators code an infinite number of conserved charges . by definition , the transfer matrix is the supertrace of the monodromy matrix . the monodromy matrix itself is an element of the supergroup @xmath10 . thus the classical transfer matrix is a supercharacter . if the shifts of the spectral parameter are neglected , the t - system reduces to a character identity that is known to hold ( see e.g. @xcite@xcite ) . we deduce that the shifts of the spectral parameter come from some kind of quantum effects . in this paper we take the identification the t - functions to the transfer matrices seriously . the t - system is promoted to an operator identity between quantum transfer matrices . we postulate that the product appearing in the t - system is the fusion of line operators . the process of fusion of line operators involve quantum effects , that are responsible for the appearance of the shifts in the t - system . we will show that this picture is indeed correct up to first non - trivial order in the large t hooft coupling expansion . more precisely , we will compute the leading quantum correction in the fusion of two transfer matrices , and show that it correctly gives the shifts of the t - system at first order . the same strategy was previously successfully applied for the sigma - model on the supergroup @xmath11 in @xcite . [ [ organization - of - the - paper . ] ] organization of the paper . + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + in section [ worldsheettheory ] we describe the features of the pure spinor string on @xmath3 that are relevant for our purposes . we also introduce the relevant line operators . in section [ fusion ] we present the central computation of this work : we study the fusion of line operators up to second order in perturbation theory . in section [ prooftsys ] we make good use of this computation to deduce the validity of the t - system up to first order in perturbation theory . section [ extensions ] contains a discussion of the extension of this method to other integrable models . eventually final remarks are gathered in section [ conclusion ] . in order to keep the bulk of the paper as readable as possible , most of the details of the computations are gathered in the appendices . appendix [ conventions ] contains the conventions . in appendix [ covcurrents ] we revisit the computation of the current - current opes in the pure spinor formalism using a novel and efficient method . in appendix [ computationdiv ] we study the uv divergences in line operators . eventually appendix [ comfusion ] contains the computations relevant for the fusion of line operators . to describe superstring theory in @xmath7 we will use the pure spinor formalism . this choice is a matter of convenience . indeed the computations of section [ fusion ] are simpler in the conformal gauge , where target - space covariance is preserved . in this section we introduce the pure spinor string on @xmath7 . we only discuss the features of this formalism that are relevant for the purpose of this paper . a more detailed discussion can be found for instance in @xcite@xcite@xcite . we introduce the flat connection , and show that the commutator of equal - time connections can be written in the canonical form of a @xmath12 system . we also introduce the line operators that are defined as the path - ordered exponential of the line integral of the flat connection . finally we discuss the uv divergences that appear in these line operators because of quantum effects . most of the results discussed in this section have appeared before in the literature . some new results are presented concerning the current algebra , the commutator of equal - time connections and the renormalization of the line operators . the target - space @xmath3 is embedded in a superspace with 32 supercharges . it is realized as the supercoset @xmath13 . the lie superalgebra @xmath14 admits the action of a @xmath15 automorphism . this automorphism induces a @xmath15 grading on the elements of the lie superalgebra . we can decompose the lie algebra @xmath16 according to this grading : [ z4decompo ] = _ 0 _ 1 _ 2 _ 3 where the subscript gives the @xmath15 grade . bosonic ( respectively fermionic ) generators of the lie superalgebra have an even ( respectively odd ) grade . [ [ the - action . ] ] the action . + + + + + + + + + + + let us introduce the currents @xmath17 and @xmath18 defined in terms of the group element @xmath19 as : [ j = gdg ] j = g^-1 g ; |j = g^-1 |g they take values in the lie superalgebra @xmath16 . we decompose the current @xmath17 according to the @xmath15 grading of the lie superalgebra : j = j_0 + j_1 + j_2 + j_3 and similarly for @xmath18 . let us also introduce the bosonic pure spinor ghosts @xmath20 as well as their conjugate momenta @xmath21 . they expand on the fermionic generators of the superalgebra with the following gradings : @xmath22 and @xmath23 . the ghosts satisfy the pure spinor constraint : @xmath24 , where the @xmath25 s are the @xmath26 gamma matrices . the pure spinor lorentz currents are : n=-\{w , } ; n = -\{w , } the action reads : @xmath27 the first line of the action contains a kinetic term both for the bosonic and fermionic target space coordinates . this implies in particular that the model does not exhibit kappa - symmetry , contrary to the green - schwarz string . the radius of the target space is denoted by @xmath28 in units of the string length . later on we will work perturbatively in a large radius expansion : the small parameter is @xmath29 . [ [ gauge - symmetry . ] ] gauge symmetry . + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + the action admits a @xmath30 gauge symmetry : g = g h_0 , = [ , h_0 ] , = [ , h_0 ] , w = [ w , h_0 ] , w = [ w , h_0 ] the holomorphic currents transform as : i0 : j_i = [ j_i , h_0 ] ; j_0 = h_0 + [ j_0 , h_0 ] ; n = [ n , h_0 ] and similarly for the anti - holomorphic currents . we introduce the associated covariant derivative : = + [ j_0 , ] ; |= |+ [ |j_0 , ] [ [ parity . ] ] parity . + + + + + + + the model enjoys a @xmath31 symmetry that exchanges holomorphic and anti - holomorphic worldsheet coordinates . it also flips the grade of the fermionic elements of the lie superalgebra : the subalgebras @xmath32 and @xmath33 are exchanged . [ [ the - maurer - cartan - equation . ] ] the maurer - cartan equation . + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + a consequence of is that the current satisfies the maurer - cartan equation : [ mc ] |j - |j + [ j , |j ] = 0 this is a crucial equation that is essentially responsible for the integrable properties of the model . [ [ equations - of - motion . ] ] equations of motion . + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + the equations of motion combined with the maurer - cartan equation lead to : [ mc+eom ] lll |j_1 = [ j_3,|j_2 ] + [ j_2,|j_3 ] + [ n,|j_1 ] - [ j_1,n ] & & |j_1 = [ n,|j_1 ] - [ j_1,n ] |j_2 = [ j_3,|j_3 ] + [ n,|j_2 ] - [ j_2,n ] & & |j_2 = - [ j_1,|j_1 ] + [ n,|j_2 ] - [ j_2,n ] |j_3 = [ n,|j_3 ] - [ j_3,n ] & & |j_3 = - [ j_1,|j_2 ] - [ j_2,|j_1 ] + [ n,|j_3 ] - [ j_3,n ] |n = -[n , n ] & & n = [ n , n ] in this section we discuss the current - current opes that are the elementary input needed for the computations of section [ fusion ] . the set of currents we consider are the currents @xmath34 , @xmath35 , @xmath36 , @xmath37 as well as the ghost lorentz current @xmath38 , together with their anti - holomorphic partners @xmath39 , @xmath40 , @xmath41 , @xmath42 and @xmath43 . in order to simplify the expressions in the following computations , we introduce the generic notation @xmath44 , @xmath45 for the currents . the index @xmath46 takes the values in the set @xmath47 . for @xmath48 we define @xmath49 , @xmath50 . for the particular value @xmath51 we define @xmath52 , @xmath53 , and @xmath54 stands for ghost " . the index @xmath46 codes the @xmath15-grade of the current . the ghost currents have grade zero . the opes of the gauge covariant currents have been discussed in various papers . the opes at first - order in the @xmath29 expansion have been analyzed in @xcite@xcite@xcite@xcite . the @xmath55 corrections to the second - order poles have been computed in @xcite . for the purpose of the present article , the knowledge of the current algebra at order @xmath29 is enough . in appendix [ covcurrents ] we present a new and rather efficient way of computing the current algebra . the idea is to demand compatibility with the maurer - cartan equation and with the equations of motion ( more precisely with the reparametrization invariance of the path integral ) . notice that the opes involving @xmath34 and @xmath39 generically suffer from some ambiguities because of the gauge freedom . at the end of appendix [ covcurrents ] we compare the version of the current algebra we compute with the ones that appeared previously in the literature . it is convenient to expand the current on a basis of the lie superalgebra that is compatible with the @xmath15 grading . we write : k_m = k_m^a_m t_a_m the indices @xmath56 are adjoint indices$ ] , @xmath57 , @xmath58 , @xmath59 . although slightly less explicit , the notations used here allow for a much more compact writing . ] restricted to the subspace of the lie superalgebra of grade @xmath46 . the generators @xmath60 form a basis of the subspace @xmath61 . the current algebra takes the form : @xmath62 the tensors @xmath63 and @xmath64 are respectively the metric and the structure constants ( see appendix [ conventions ] for conventions ) . the non - trivial data in the current algebra is coded in the coefficients @xmath65 , @xmath66 . these coefficients should be read as follows : the coefficient @xmath67 give the coefficient of the identity operator in the ope between the currents @xmath35 and @xmath37 , the coefficient @xmath68 give the coefficient of the ghost current @xmath38 in the ope between @xmath36 and @xmath41 , and so on . we introduced a sum over all currents in the first - order poles in order to simplify the writing , but many of the @xmath69 s are clearly zero since they do not respect the @xmath15 grading . the coefficients @xmath65 , @xmath66 are symmetric in their two lower indices . also @xmath70 should be understood as @xmath71 . the non - zero coefficients are given below . the non - vanishing second - order poles are : c_13 = -1 , c_1 |3 = 1 , c_|1 3 = 1 , c_|1 |3 = -1 , c_22 = -1 , c_2|2 = 1 , c_|2 |2 = -1 the first - order poles involving only the currents of non - zero grade are : c c_11 ^ 2 = 2 , c_11^|2 = 1 , c_1 |1 ^ 2 = 1 , c_|1 |1^|2 = 1 c_33 ^ 2 = 1 , c_3|3^|2 = 1 , c_|3 |3 ^ 2 = 1 , c_|3 |3^|2 = 2 c_12 ^ 3 = 2 , c_12^|3 = 1 , c_|1 2 ^ 3 = 1 , c_1|2 ^ 3 = 1 , c_|1 |2^|3 = 1 c_32 ^ 1 = 1 , c_|3 2^|1 = 1 , c_3 |2^|1 = 1 , c_|3 |2 ^ 1 = 1 , c_|3 |2^|1 = 2 the first - order poles involving the ghosts currents are : c c_22^g = 1 , c_22^|g = -1 , c_2 |2^g = 1 , c_2 |2^|g = 1 , c_|2 |2^g = -1 , c_|2 |2^|g = 1 c_13^g = 1 , c_13^|g = -1 , c_1 |3^g = 1 , c_1 |3^|g= 1 , c_|1 3^g = 1 , c_|1 3^|g = 1 , c_|1 |3^g = -1 , c_|1 |3^|g = 1 c_gg^g = -1 , c_|g |g^|g = -1 eventually the first - order poles involving the currents @xmath34 , @xmath39 are : c c_10 ^ 1 = 1 , c_0 |1 ^ 1 = 1 , c_|0 1^|1 = 1 , c_|0 |1^|1 = 1 c_02 ^ 2 = 1 , c_0 |2 ^ 2 = 1 , c_|0 2^|2 = 1 , c_|0 |2^|2 = 1 c_30 ^ 3 = 1 , c_0 |3 ^ 3 = 1 , c_|0 3^|3 = 1 , c_|0 |3^|3 = 1 c_13 ^ 0 = 1 , c_13^|0 = 1 , c_|1 |3 ^ 0 = 1 , c_|1 |3^|0 = 1 c_22 ^ 0 = 1 , c_22^|0 = 1 , c_|2 |2 ^ 0 = 1 , c_|2 |2^|0 = 1 the method we are using to compute the current algebra does not fix completely the self - opes of @xmath34 and @xmath39 . we only obtain the following constraints : @xmath72 it turns out that these constraints are enough to perform explicitly the computations presented in this paper , @xmath39 appear in the flat connection with no dependence on the spectral parameter . this in turns implies that these coefficients cancel against each other in the computation of the fusion line operators presented in section [ fusion ] . notice however that the cancellation of some divergences in the line operators depends on the value of the coefficients , see . ] . similarly to the green - schwarz string @xcite@xcite , the pure spinor string on @xmath7 admits a one - parameter family of flat connections @xcite . this implies that the classical theory admits an infinite number of conserved charges . the flat connection @xmath73 is defined as : @xmath74 the flat connection is invariant under parity combined with the exchange of @xmath75 and @xmath76 . the equations of motion together with the maurer - cartan equation imply that the previous connection is flat for all values of the spectral parameter @xmath75 : d a(y ) + a(y ) a(y ) = 0 in the following we study line operators that are the path - ordered exponential of the integral of the flat connection along a given contour . we will only consider integration contours that lie at constant time . consequently only the spacelike component of the flat connection will appear . for simplicity , we use the same notation @xmath73 for the connection and for its spacelike component . the advantage of the version of the current algebra we are working with is that the commutator of two equal - time space - component of the flat connection can be written as a @xmath12 system : @xmath77 = & 2s \p_\sigma\delta^{(2)}(\sigma-\sigma ' ) + [ a_r(y;\sigma)+ a_{r'}(y';\sigma'),r ] \delta^{(2)}(\sigma-\sigma ' ) \cr & + [ a_r(y;\sigma)- a_{r'}(y';\sigma'),s ] \delta^{(2)}(\sigma-\sigma')\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath28 and @xmath78 denote the representations the two connections are transforming in . the commutator transforms in the tensor product @xmath79 . only the terms explicitly written down in the opes contribute to the commutator . the infinite number of subleading singularities contained in the ellipses of do not contribute to the commutator of equal - time currents ( see e.g. @xcite ) . as shown in appendix [ apprsmatrices ] , the constant matrices @xmath80 and @xmath81 are given by : @xmath82 and : @xmath83 later it will be important that the @xmath80 matrix simplifies in the limit where the difference between the spectral parameters @xmath75 and @xmath84 is small : [ rlim ] y - y 0r ~ y(y^2+y^-2)^2 t_a^r t_b^r ^ba the @xmath12 matrices , first appeared in @xcite . a detailed study of the @xmath12 system for string theory in @xmath3 and its properties can be found in @xcite@xcite@xcite ( see appendix [ appcompkalgebras ] for more details ) . [ [ definitions . ] ] definitions . + + + + + + + + + + + + we are interested in studying line operators that are the path - ordered exponential of the integral of the flat connection on a given contour . when the contour is an interval @xmath85 $ ] , the line operator is called the transition matrix . we denote it as @xmath86 : t^b , a_r(y ) = p ( - _ a^b a_r(y ) ) the transition matrix is labelled by the representation @xmath28 in which the flat connection transforms . flatness of the connection implies that the classical transition matrix does not depend on the integration path chosen . this property has been argued to extend to the quantum theory in @xcite . for simplicity we consider only constant - time contours . for string theory purposes we are lead to define the theory on a cylinder . then we can define the monodromy matrix which is the line operator associated with a closed contour winding once around the cylinder : _ r(y ) = p ( -a_r(y ) ) flatness of the connection implies that the eigenvalues of the monodromy matrix are independent on time . consequently they code an infinite number of conserved charges . eventually the transfer matrix is the supertrace of the monodromy matrix : [ deftransfer ] _ r(y ) = str p ( -a_r(y ) ) [ [ regularization - of - uv - divergences . ] ] regularization of uv divergences . + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + in a quantum theory the line operators are generically ill - defined since the collisions of integrated connections lead to divergences . to properly define line operators one has to regularize these divergences , and then renormalize the line operators . in order to study the uv divergences , we first have to expand the exponentials in the line operators . we write the transition matrix as : t^b , a_r(y ) = _ m=0^(-1)^m t_r,(m)^b , a(y ) where the @xmath87-th term is the path - ordered integral of @xmath87 connections : t_r,(m)^b , a(y ) = p(_a^b a_r(y ) ) ^m = _ b>_1> ... >_m > ad_1 ... d_m a_r(y;_1) ... a_r(y;_m ) and similarly for the monodromy and transfer matrices . divergences occur when two integrated connections collide . it is clear from the current algebra that the collision of two connections leads to second- and first - order poles . in order to regularize these divergences , we introduce a uv cut - off @xmath88 . we use a principal - value regularization scheme as suggested in @xcite . the ope between two equal - time connections @xmath89 and @xmath90 is regularized by a small shift in time , in a symmetric way : [ defreg ] a ( ) a( ) ( a(+i ) a( ) + a ( ) a(+i ) ) for instance , a first - order pole is regularized as : [ reg1pole ] p.v . = ( + ) = this regularization scheme turns out to be very convenient to discuss the fusion of line operators , as explained in section [ fusion ] . [ [ divergences - at - order - r-2 . ] ] divergences at order @xmath29 . + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + the first - order divergences in line operators in the pure spinor string on @xmath7 were first studied in @xcite . in this paper the authors used a different regularization scheme : the opes were regularized by imposing that the distance between two connections can not be smaller than the uv cut - off . the authors of @xcite also used a slightly different version of the current algebra . in appendix [ computationdiv ] we revisit the analysis of @xcite using the regularization scheme and the current algebra . the main difference we obtain with respect to @xcite is that the linear divergences do cancel thanks to our choice of regularization scheme . below we summarize the results derived in appendix [ computationdiv ] . the transition matrices contain logarithmic divergences . schematically , these divergences read : ~_i=0 ^ 3 # \ { t^a_i t_a_i , t^b , a(y ) } the precise expression for these divergences is given in equation . consequently the transition matrices need to be renormalized . these divergences are cancelled by a simple wave - function renormalization . the monodromy matrix also contains logarithmic divergences . these are given in . schematically , these divergences read : [ divomega ] ~_i=0 ^ 3 # ( t^a_i t_a_i ( y ) + ( y ) t^a_i t_a_i - 2 t^a_i ( y ) t_a_i ) the new divergences with respect to the transition matrices come from collisions between connections sitting on both sides of the starting point of the integration contour . these divergences are cancelled by a simple wave - function renormalization of the monodromy matrix . the most important result for the purpose of this paper is that the transfer matrix is completely free of divergences at order @xmath29 . this follows simply by taking the supertrace of equation . this remarkable property strongly relies on the vanishing of the dual coxeter number of the global symmetry group @xmath10 . for instance in generic wzw models , cancellation of divergences in the transfer matrices require both a wave - function renormalization and a renormalization of the spectral parameter @xcite . the divergences identified in @xcite also vanish if the dual coxeter number of the group is zero . in this section we study the fusion of two line operators . the fusion is the process of bringing the integration contours of two line operators on top of each other . we are interested in the quantum effects that occur in this process . the fusion of line operators for the pure - spinor string in @xmath7 was studied at first - order in perturbation theory in @xcite . in this section we will revisit and extend the first - order computations of @xcite . then we will further extend the computation of fusion up to second order in perturbation theory . the structure of the computations is similar to the ones presented in @xcite , where more details can be found . in @xcite the computations were performed in the sigma model on the supergroup @xmath11 . this theory is a good toy model for the pure spinor string on @xmath7 . indeed the complications coming from the coset structure and the pure spinor ghosts are absent . let us consider two transition matrices @xmath86 and @xmath91 that transform respectively in the representations @xmath28 and @xmath78 . the fusion of these two matrices transforms in the tensor product @xmath92 . in the following we will omit the symbol @xmath93 to lighten the formulas . we represent the fusion of these two transition matrices with the symbol @xmath94 . this process is defined as : [ deffusion ] t^b , a_r(y)t^d , c_r(y ) = _ 0^+ t^b+i , a+i_r(y)t^d , c_r(y ) assuming the integration contour of the transition matrices @xmath91 lies at constant time @xmath95 , then the integration contour of @xmath96 lies at constant time @xmath97 . if the intervals @xmath85 $ ] and @xmath98 $ ] do not overlap , the process of fusion is trivial . in the following we assume that the overlap of these intervals is non - zero . as the distance between the two contours goes to zero , the opes between integrated connections sitting on the two contours produce quantum corrections to the classical process of fusion . these are the corrections we will evaluate . let us consider the ope between two connections @xmath99 and @xmath100 integrated respectively on the first and on the second contour . we write this ope as : @xmath101 comparing with equation , we notice that the first term in the previous equation should be understood as regularized ope in the quantum line operator obtained after the fusion has been completed . on the other hand , the second term in should be understood as producing a quantum correction proper to the process of fusion . this are the corrections we want to compute . in order to understand better the meaning of , let us isolate a first - order pole in the ope between the two connections . under the decomposition , it is rewritten as : @xmath102 the term we focus on is the second term on the right - hand side . as the notation suggests , it is actually a regularization of the delta - function . once we integrate upon the free coordinates , it produces a finite quantum corrections to the fusion of line operators . we can perform a similar manipulation for all first- and second - order poles appearing in the ope between the two connections @xmath99 and @xmath100 . in order to isolate the contribution to the quantum corrections associated with fusion , we subtract the principal value from the singularities . we obtain that all the terms that contribute to the quantum corrections from fusion come with ( derivatives of ) regularized delta functions . the upshot is the following : in order to compute the quantum corrections in the process of fusion , we have to subtract the `` principal value '' piece from the ope between connections . what we are left with is essentially the commutator between connections that we computed in : [ 1-pvaa ] ( 1-p.v . ) a_r(y;+i ) a_r(y; ) [ a_r(y ; ) , a_r(y; ) ] we begin with the corrections of order @xmath29 . since all terms in the current algebra are of order @xmath29 , it is enough to perform one ope . the computation of the first - order corrections in the fusion of two transition matrices was performed in @xcite using ope techniques . this computation holds provided the commutator of connections can be written as a @xmath12 system , which is the case for the pure spinor string on @xmath3 ( see ) . the result obtained in @xcite matches the hamiltonian analysis of @xcite : @xmath103 the first term on the right - hand side is the zeroth - order result . the remaining terms are the first - order corrections . the function @xmath104 is the characteristic function of the interval @xmath105 $ ] which takes the value @xmath106 if @xmath107 and @xmath108 if @xmath109 or @xmath110 . for the special case where the integration intervals of the line operators have coinciding endpoints , that is for @xmath111 or @xmath112 , then the characteristic function @xmath104 has to be evaluated as @xmath113 . this prescription essentially had to be guessed in the hamiltonian formalism @xcite . in the ope formalism it is a consequence of the definition @xcite . notice that the first - order corrections in are anti - symmetric in the exchange of the two line operators . so they contribute only to the commutator of the line operators . this follows from the fact that the quantum corrections associated with fusion come from the anti - symmetric part in the opes ( see ) . from equation we can deduce the fusion of transfer matrices @xcite . we obtain that the fusion of transfer matrices at first order is trivial : @xmath114 indeed the first - order corrections associated with fusion in take the form of constant matrices inserted at the endpoints of the overlap of the integration intervals . since the transfer matrices have no endpoints , it is not surprising that these corrections vanish . this implies in particular that the commutator of the transfer matrices is zero at first order . remember that our main goal is to show that the leading quantum correction in the fusion of two transfer matrices gives the shifts in the t - system at first order . since the fusion of transfer matrices is trivial at first - order , we need to study the fusion of line operators at second - order . there are two different ways we can obtain @xmath55 corrections in the process of fusion : * the first way is to take one single ope between two integrated connections , and include @xmath55 corrections to the current algebra . as argued in section [ recipefusion ] , only the anti - symmetric part of the current - current opes contributes to the process of fusion . consequently at this order the @xmath55 corrections to the current algebra lead to @xmath55 corrections to the commutator of line operators . we postpone the computation of these corrections for future work since the current algebra is only partially known at order @xmath55 @xcite . * the second way is to perform two opes between integrated connections and use the current algebra at order @xmath29 . following the logic explained in section [ recipefusion ] , we again consider only the anti - symmetric part in each ope . since we perform an even number of opes this time the result will be symmetric under the exchange of the two line operators . more precisely we obtain a contribution to the symmetric product of the line operators of order @xmath55 . this are the terms that we will compute in this paper . more generally , the arguments of section [ recipefusion ] imply that any quantum correction in the process of fusion that involve an even ( respectively odd ) number of opes would contribute only to the symmetric product ( respectively commutator ) of the line operators . consequently the @xmath55 corrections to the current algebra would contribute to the symmetric product of line operators at order @xmath115 and higher . below we describe the different steps in the computation of the symmetric fusion of line operators at order @xmath55 . in an attempt to keep this section readable , the technical details of the computation have been gathered in appendix [ comfusion ] . more details can also be found in @xcite . let us consider two line operators with contours separated in time by a small distance @xmath88 . we have to take two opes between the connections integrated on the contours . the simplest way is to take two opes between two distinct pairs of connections . but we can also take one ope between two connections , and then take the ope of the resulting currents with a third connections . we will call this latter process a triple collision ( see figure [ triplecollision ] ) . ] the computation is conveniently decomposed in two steps . * a first part of the total answer is obtained in the way depicted in figure [ fuso2step1 ] . we start from the result of the fusion at first order . we pull the contours away , and then re - fuse the line operators . the result of this procedure was computed in @xcite for an arbitrary @xmath12 system . we obtain new insertion of constant matrices at the endpoints of the overlap of the contours of the line operators . roughly speaking , the first - order result exponentiate . what is important for our purposes is that this procedure gives once again a vanishing result for the fusion of transfer matrices . this simply follows from the fact that there is no first - order correction in the fusion of transfer matrices . * the procedure described above does not capture correctly the quantum corrections coming from triple collisions . indeed in this procedure , the intermediate currents in the triple collisions are distributed in an arbitrary way on the two integration contours so that they recombine into connections . this induces a source of errors . so we have to compute separately additional corrections coming from the triple collisions . this is done in appendix [ comfusion ] . ] the analysis of appendix [ comfusion ] shows that there are two types of corrections that we need to add on top of the result obtained by the procedure described in figure [ fuso2step1 ] . the first type of corrective terms contain the integration of an operator @xmath116 on the overlap of the contours : @xmath117\cap[c , d]}d\sigma \left \lfloor \int_\sigma^b a \right\rceil^i \left \lfloor \int_\sigma^d a ' \right\rceil^{i ' } \tilde k ( \sigma ) \left \lfloor \int_a^\sigma a \right\rceil^{m - i } \left \lfloor \int_c^\sigma a ' \right\rceil^{m'-i ' } \end{aligned}\ ] ] where we introduced the convenient notation @xmath118 to describe the path - ordered integral of @xmath87 connections on the interval @xmath85 $ ] . the precise expression for the operator @xmath116 is explicitly given in . schematically , the operator @xmath116 is a linear combination of the currents multiplied by three generators of the lie superalgebra in the representations @xmath28 or @xmath78 , and contracted with structure constants . the second type of corrective terms contain a constant matrix @xmath119 inserted in between the integrated connections on the overlap of the integration contours : @xmath120 the precise expression for the matrix @xmath119 is given in . schematically , it is a linear combination of the tensor product of two generators taken in the representation @xmath28 and @xmath78 and contracted with structure constants . notice that the integration over the regularized delta function squared produce a linear divergence when the uv regulator @xmath88 is sent to zero . it would be interesting to perform a complete analysis of the second - order divergences in the line operators along the lines of section 3 in @xcite , to see whether the transfer matrices as well as the result of the fusion of transfer matrices are free of divergences up to second - order . [ [ fusion - of - transfer - matrices - at - second - order - upshot . ] ] fusion of transfer matrices at second order : upshot . + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + the detailed expression for the symmetric fusion of transition and monodromy matrices at second order is quite indigestible , so we refrain from giving an explicit formula for those . on the other hand the symmetric fusion of transfer matrices , that is crucial for the purposes of this paper , turns out to be rather simple : @xmath121 where we denoted by @xmath122 the symmetrized fusion product . this result is schematically represented in figure [ fusionts ] . the detailed expressions for the operator @xmath116 and the constant matrix @xmath119 can be read from equations and . is integrated in between the connections . in the third term , a constant matrix @xmath119 is inserted in between the integrated connections.[fusionts ] ] in this section we use the previous computations to obtain a first - principle perturbative derivation of the t - system . as explained in the introduction , the idea is to promote the t - system to an operator identity , where the product between transfer matrices is understood as the fusion product : [ qtsystem ] _ a , s(u + 1 ) _ a , s(u - 1 ) = _ a+1,s(u+1)_a-1,s(u-1 ) + _ a , s-1(u+1 ) _ a , s+1(u-1 ) we expect the transfer matrices to commute in the quantum theory . this has been proven in section [ fusion ] at order @xmath29 . consequently we can equivalently use the symmetric fusion product to define the t - system . the integer label @xmath123 label unitary irreducible representation of @xmath10 . these labels take value in a t - shaped lattice ( see e.g. @xcite@xcite ) . the corresponding representations are associated with rectangular young tableaux which size is given by the value of the labels @xmath123 . it is known that these representations satisfy the following supercharacter identity ( see e.g. @xcite@xcite ) : [ charid1 ] ( a , s)^2 = ( a+1,s)(a-1,s)+(a , s+1)(a , s-1 ) in the limit where we neglect both the shifts of the spectral parameter as well as the quantum effects associated with fusion , the t - system reduces to the character identity . next we want to show that the t - system holds at first order . we consider : @xmath124 where we use the shorthand @xmath125 to denote the sum over representations that appears in the t - system . we look for a value of the shift of the spectral parameters @xmath126 such that the previous quantity does indeed vanish , and the t - system holds . then we can deduce the relationship between the spectral parameter @xmath75 used to define the flat connection , and the spectral parameter @xmath8 that appears in the t - system . we assume that @xmath126 is of order @xmath29 . we will now show that the terms of order @xmath29 in do vanish . more precisely , the terms of order @xmath29 coming from the derivative expansion of the transfer matrices cancel against the leading quantum correction coming from the process of fusion . [ [ fusion - of - transfer - matrices - when - the - difference - of - spectral - parameter - is - small . ] ] fusion of transfer matrices when the difference of spectral parameter is small . + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + in section [ fusion ] we obtained that the leading quantum correction in the fusion of transfer matrices is of order @xmath55 . however when the difference of the spectral parameter is of order @xmath29 , a piece of the leading quantum correction actually becomes of order @xmath29 . so it has the right order of magnitude to cancel the first term in the derivative expansion of the transfer matrices in . more details can be found at the end of appendix [ comfusion ] . the interesting term comes from the second line in . we assume @xmath127 . from equations we obtain that simplifies to : @xmath128 t_{b_n}^{r ' } + { f_{c_p}}^{b_n a_m } { f_{e_r}}^ { d_q c_p } t_{a_m}^r \ { t_{b_n}^{r ' } , t_{d_q}^{r'}]\right)\right)\cr & \quad \times \left . t_r^ { \sigma,0}(y ) t_{r'}^{\sigma,0}(y ' ) \right ) + \mathcal{o}(r^{-4})\end{aligned}\ ] ] we observe that the linear combination of the currents that appears is now proportional to the derivative of the flat connection . [ [ useful - character - identities . ] ] useful character identities . + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + to further simplify the quantum corrections that appear in , we need to use some character identities that holds for the particular combination of representations that appear in the t - system . in @xcite the validity of the t - system was proven for transfer matrices associated to @xmath129 spin chains . then a large family of character identities was deduced by expanding the t - system as an infinite series . here we go the other way : we try to reconstruct the t - system from a perturbative expansion . thus it makes sense that we need to use the character identities of @xcite . in the appendix e of @xcite , it was shown that some of these character identities imply in particular that for any group element @xmath54 and for any function @xmath130 : @xmath131 g^r \otimes t_b^{r ' } g^{r ' } ) \cr & = 2 \sum_{r , r ' } str ( g^r \otimes k^e t_e^{r ' } g^{r ' } ) - str ( k^e t_e^{r } g^r \otimes g^{r ' } ) \end{aligned}\ ] ] and similarly : @xmath132 g^{r ' } ) \cr & = 2 \sum_{r , r ' } str ( g^r \otimes k^e t_e^{r ' } g^{r ' } ) - str ( k^e t_e^{r } g^r \otimes g^{r ' } ) \end{aligned}\ ] ] essentially , these character identities allow to replace the complicated combination of structure constants and generators appearing in by single generators , assuming we consider the sum of representation that appear in the t - system . so we obtain : @xmath133 [ [ the - t - system - at - first - order . ] ] the t - system at first order . + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + performing a taylor expansion for the @xmath134 s in , we deduce : @xmath135 the first term in the previous expression vanishes because of the classical identity . in order for the first - order corrections to vanish as well , we have to take : [ defdelta ] = r^-2 y(y^2-y^-2)^2 thus have have shown that : [ tsys4 ] _ r , r _ r(y+ ) _ r(y- ) = 0 + ( r^-4 ) [ [ redefinition - of - the - spectral - parameter . ] ] redefinition of the spectral parameter . + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + in order to write the t - system in the canonical form we define : [ defu ] u = + cst such that @xmath136 . then equation is rewritten as : _ a , s(u + 1 ) _ a , s(u - 1 ) = _ a+1,s(u+1)_a-1,s(u-1 ) + _ a , s-1(u+1 ) _ a , s+1(u-1 ) + ... this is the canonical form of the t - system . [ [ comparison - with - the - t - system - obtained - via - the - thermodynamic - bethe - ansatz . ] ] comparison with the t - system obtained via the thermodynamic bethe ansatz . + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + we can now perform a consistency check with the thermodynamic bethe ansatz derivation of the @xmath3 t - system @xcite@xcite@xcite . in this context the t - system is obtained in a slightly different form : only the t - functions on the left - hand side have a shifted spectral parameter : [ tsystemtba ] ^tba_a , s(u + 1 ) ^tba_a , s(u - 1 ) = ^tba_a+1,s(u ) ^tba_a-1,s(u ) + ^tba_a , s-1(u ) ^tba_a , s+1(u ) this mismatch is easily cured by a redefinition of the t - functions . let us define the functions @xmath137 as : ^tba_a , s(u ) = _ a , s(u+a - s)then the functions @xmath138 s satisfy if and only if the functions @xmath134 s satisfy the t - system . however the previous redefinition does not change the magnitude of the shift on the left - hand side of the t - system . thus the matching of the shifts gives a quantitative check of the consistency between the approach taken in this paper , and the tba approach . next we perform this matching using the conventions of @xcite@xcite . the flat connection is written in terms of a spectral parameter @xmath139 as @xmath140 . comparing with we deduce that the spectral parameter @xmath75 that we use is related to @xmath139 as : @xmath141 . the variable @xmath142 that enters the tba t - system is linked to the spectral parameter @xmath139 via the zhukowsky map : @xmath143 , where @xmath54 is related to the t hooft coupling @xmath144 as @xmath145 . the parameter @xmath28 can be linked to the t hooft coupling @xmath144 by identification of the prefactor of the worldsheet action . this gives @xmath146 . consequently the parameter @xmath8 that we obtained is related to the parameter @xmath142 as : @xmath147 , assuming the free constant in takes the value @xmath148 . the analysis of @xcite gives a t - system where the parameter @xmath142 is shifted by @xmath149 . given that @xmath8 is shifted in our case by @xmath150 , there is an apparent mismatch by a factor of @xmath151 . this comes from the fact that we have been working on an euclidean worldsheet . if we wick - rotate the worldsheet to a minkowskian signature , then our analysis produce the t - system with imaginary shifts in e.g. would be replaced by a real shift @xmath88 . this implies that in the computation of fusion all opes would come with an additional factor of @xmath151 . consequently the second - order corrections from fusion would come with an additional minus sign . this would in turn induce a factor of @xmath151 in the shift of the t - system . ] in perfect agreement with the tba analysis . [ [ upshot . ] ] upshot . + + + + + + + as claimed previously , we have derived the t - system up to first order in the large radius expansion . more precisely , we have sown that the shifts of the spectral parameter in the t - system come from quantum effects in the fusion of transfer matrices . moreover we have checked that the shifts are the same than the ones obtained in the thermodynamic bethe ansatz derivation of the t - system . notice that the vanishing of the divergences in the transfer matrices is important . indeed if the transfer matrices would need to be renormalized , then the renormalization factor would most likely depend on the representation in which the transfer matrix is taken ( see e.g. @xcite ) . it implies that the different terms in the t - system would be renormalized differently , which would most likely destroy the balance needed for the previous computation to work . in this paper we have proven that the t - system is realized in the pure spinor string on @xmath7 up to first order in the large radius expansion . in @xcite a similar proof was given for the non - linear sigma model on the supergroup @xmath11 . it is natural to look for other theories where this derivation can be easily generalized . a close look at the computation leads to the following conclusion : there are only a few necessary and sufficient conditions that a given model has to fulfill in order for the derivation to apply . obviously the theory has to exhibit a one - parameter family of flat connections . we assume that the connection takes value in a lie algebra . the other conditions are the following : * the equal - time commutator of the spacelike component of the connection can be written as a @xmath12 system . this guarantees that formula can be directly reproduced . moreover the @xmath80 matrix must satisfy a property similar to equation : in the limit where the difference between the spectral parameter is small , the @xmath80 matrix needs to be proportional to the casimir @xmath152 . this condition is necessary for the simplification leading to equation to occur . * the lie group needs to possess an equivalent of the character identities , . given the role played by the results of @xcite , it is tempting to speculate that a sufficient condition is that there exists a spin chain with the same symmetry group that realizes the t - system . * eventually the transfer matrix has to be free of divergences at first order in perturbation theory . a crucial condition here is that the dual coxeter number of the symmetry group vanishes . this condition prevents the renormalization of the transfer matrices from destroying the balance needed for the computation to work . next we discuss several candidate theories that may fulfill these requirements . [ [ candidate - theories - relevant - for - the - adscft - correspondence . ] ] candidate theories relevant for the ads / cft correspondence . + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + let us begin with the theories that describe superstrings in anti - de sitter backgrounds . these theories are built on sigma models on ( coset of ) supergroups , see e.g. @xcite for a classification of the relevant @xmath15 cosets . notice that all the supergroups involved have a vanishing dual coxeter number . this should not come as a surprise , since the vanishing of the dual coxeter number is tightly related to the vanishing of the spacetime supercurvature , and thus to the fact that the equations of motion of supergravity are satisfied . spacetime covariance was helpful in the previous analysis . consequently we will mostly discuss theories of the pure - spinor type that allow for a covariant quantization . obviously it would be interesting to reproduce the previous computations in green - schwarz - like theories that realize kappa - symmetry . the structure of the computations would be identical , but the computations themselves would be more tedious because the gauge - fixing of kappa symmetry usually comes with a breaking of the target space isometries . the first obvious candidate is string theory on @xmath153 . indeed in @xcite a y - system was conjectured to hold in this theory . the tba derivation of the y - system was performed in @xcite@xcite . in order to actually reproduce the computations described in the present paper , the pure spinor formulation of superstring theory in @xmath153 developed in @xcite is a natural starting point ( see also @xcite ) . the second candidate is string theory on @xmath154 . the analysis of @xcite applies to the sigma - model on @xmath155 . in @xcite the hybrid formalism was developed to describe superstrings in @xmath154 in a superspace with eight supercharges . in this formalism the worldsheet theory is the sigma model on @xmath155 , coupled to ghosts . this theory admits a consistent expansion in the ghosts . thus the analysis of @xcite implies that the hybrid string in @xmath154 realizes the t - system up to first order in the large radius expansion , and up to zeroth order in the ghosts expansion . this is valid for @xmath154 supported by rr fluxes , ns fluxes or by any mixing of these fluxes . it would be instructive to dress up the computation of @xcite with the hybrid ghosts there has been some interest in the question of integrability for string theory in @xmath154 , see e.g. @xcite . however the progress have been rather slower than in the case of @xmath7 , mostly because the dual conformal field theory is not as well understood . presumably the approach presented in @xcite and in the present article can lead to a faster road to the solution of this problem . other formulations of string theory on @xmath154 involve a @xmath15 coset of the supergroup @xmath156 . it is the case of the hybrid string with sixteen manifest supercharges @xcite . it is reasonable to expect that the t - system is also realized in this formalism . another natural candidate is the hybrid description of superstrings in @xmath157 discussed in @xcite . it is also based on a @xmath15 coset of the supergroup @xmath155 , and it is integrable @xcite@xcite . in the classification of @xcite we find other candidate string backgrounds that are @xmath15 coset of supergroups with vanishing dual coxeter number : @xmath158 , @xmath159 , @xmath160 and @xmath6 . quantum integrability is likely to show up at least in some of these examples . no formalism has been proposed to covariantly quantize string theory in these backgrounds yet . [ [ other - candidates . ] ] other candidates . + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + other theories that may not be directly relevant for string theory presumably also realize the t - system in the way described in this paper . these are the sigma models on ( cosets of ) supergroups with vanishing dual coxeter number , some of which play a role in condensed matter ( see e.g. @xcite@xcite@xcite ) . a first example is the sigma model on the supergroup @xmath161 . this model shares many of the remarkable properties of the sigma model on @xmath11 @xcite , see e.g. @xcite . next @xmath31 cosets of supergroups with vanishing dual coxeter number are classically integrable @xcite@xcite . some of them also display nice quantum features @xcite . in these model there is a current that is both flat and conserved . consequently the current algebra is very similar to the one found in sigma models on supergroups @xcite . this follows from the generic method introduced in @xcite and used in appendix [ covcurrents ] to compute the current algebra . classical integrability extends to @xmath15 and more generally to @xmath162 cosets @xcite . it would be interesting to understand these models better . in particular it may shed some new light on the question of the role of the pure spinor ghosts for quantum integrability of the pure spinor string in @xmath7 . [ [ summary - of - the - results . ] ] summary of the results . + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + we have studied the fusion of line operators in the pure spinor string on @xmath7 up to second order in perturbation theory . we deduced that the pure spinor string on @xmath7 realizes the t - system as an operator identity , with the fusion product , up to first order in the large t hooft coupling expansion . the quantum effects in the fusion of the transfer matrices give the shifts in the t - system . [ [ comparison - with - the - thermodynamic - bethe - ansatz . ] ] comparison with the thermodynamic bethe ansatz . + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + the t - system was previously derived using the tba machinery @xcite@xcite@xcite . here we will compare the advantages of both approaches . a weakness of the tba is that it relies on several assumptions that are notoriously difficult to check . in particular one has to assume quantum integrability to start with . moreover the spectrum of excitations that contribute in the thermodynamic limit essentially has to be guessed through the string hypothesis . the approach of the current article has the big advantage of starting from first principles . the other drawback of the tba is that the derivation of the t - system only applies to the ground state . the fact that the same set of equations also codes the spectrum of excited states upon analytic continuation is essentially an empirical observation . in this paper we have derived the t - system as an operator identity . thus there is no doubt that all states of the theory satisfy the t - system . on the other hand , the approach we are using here is intrinsically perturbative . the computations needed to derive the t - system at first order were already quite heavy . it would take a lot of efforts to go to the next order . the tba approach is free of this limitation since it produces the full t - system in one go . there are also some by - products of the tba approach that were not reproduced in the present work . in particular the tba gives a explicit formula to extract the spectrum from the t - functions . it also gives some informations about the analytic properties of these functions . it would be interesting to investigate these questions with the elementary techniques used in the present paper . we hope to come back to these questions in future work . the computation presented in this paper gives a very strong argument in favor of the validity of the t - system . it is not a definite proof since it is perturbative . however the previous discussion shows that the approach presented here is complementary with the tba analysis . indeed the weak points of the tba are the the strong points in our approach , and vice - versa . so the combination of both methods leaves little room for doubts . moreover this works sheds a new light on the t - system . the fact that it should be understood as an operator identity where the product is the fusion of line operators , may be helpful to understand better the integrable structures that appear in the ads / cft correspondence . [ [ the - role - of - the - pure - spinor - ghosts . ] ] the role of the pure spinor ghosts . + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + the pure spinor ghosts are expected to play an important role in the quantum worldsheet theory . we can ask the question of the role of the pure spinor ghosts in the computation described in this paper . interestingly , the same results would be obtained if we would set the pure spinor ghosts to zero from the start . the reason is that at tree level , the ghosts form a closed subsector . more precisely the ope of a ghost current with any other current can only produce ghost current . in other words , all the coefficients of the type @xmath163 and @xmath164 in the current algebra are zero if the index @xmath46 is not @xmath54 or @xmath165 . the fact that the computation does not relies on the pure spinor ghosts can be tracked back to the fact that we only needed the tree - level current algebra to compute the crucial term that produces the shifts in the t - system . presumably this is not going to be the case at higher order . continuing the computation of @xcite to get the full current algebra at second order would be interesting . already the pure spinor should play an important role . hopefully they allow for the cancellation of second - order divergences in the transfer matrices , and they also insure that transfer matrices commute up to second order in perturbation theory . in this paper we used the pure spinor formalism that allows for a covariant quantization . it may also be instructive to reproduce this computation in the green - schwarz formulation of @xcite . [ [ the - algebra - of - transfer - matrices . ] ] the algebra of transfer matrices . + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + the computations we performed allow to address the question of the algebra of transfer matrices for the pure spinor string on @xmath7 . naively , the fusion of two transfer matrices is rather complicated . it seems from that it does not even close on transfer matrices . however by selecting a particular combination of representations we managed to close the algebra . for these representations , the algebra of transfer matrices is nothing but the t - system . there might exists a generalization of the t - system that applies for other representations . it would be interesting to further explore this issue . [ [ generalization - to - other - integrable - field - theories . ] ] generalization to other integrable field theories . + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + it would be also interesting to try the approach advocated here in other integrable theories that play a role in the ads / cft correspondence . some examples were listed in section [ extensions ] . this approach may be more efficient than trying to reproduce the historical steps that were performed for @xmath7 . more generally , developing worldsheet technology for strings in rr background is certainly worthwhile . even if the progress in that direction have been rather slow , the results presented here together with other recent works ( see e.g. @xcite@xcite ) demonstrate that quantum string theory in some rr backgrounds can be studied with the tools that are currently available . the results presented here also suggest that the integrable models relevant for the ads / cft correspondence may belong to a special family . it is not clear that the interpretation of the t - system advocated here applies straightforwardly to generic integrable field theories . indeed generically the transfer matrices have to be renormalized when the dual coxeter number of the symmetry group is non - zero ( see e.g. @xcite ) . this would complicate a tentative derivation of the t - system from the fusion of transfer matrices . the author would like to thank gleb arutyunov , oscar bedoya , denis bernard , nikolay gromov , volodya kazakov , marc magro , valentina puletti , sakura schafer - nameki , joerg teschner , jan troost , benoit vicedo , dmitro volin and in particular pedro vieira for useful discussions and correspondence . the author is a postdoctoral researcher of fwo - vlaanderen . this research is supported in part by the belgian federal science policy office through the interuniversity attraction pole iap vi/11 and by fwo - vlaanderen through project g011410n . let @xmath166 be a basis of the generators of the lie superalgebra . the metric is defined as : _ ab = str(t_a t_b ) where the supertrace @xmath167 is a non - degenerate graded - symmetric inner product . we define the inverse metric as : ^ab _ ac = ^b_c the metric and its inverse are graded - symmetric : _ ab = ( -)^ab_ba where @xmath168 is a minus sign if and only if both indices @xmath169 and @xmath170 are fermionic . an element @xmath171 of the lie superalgebra is expanded as : j = j^a t_a we adopt ne - sw " conventions for the contraction of indices . indices are raised and lowered with the metric in the following way : x^a = ^abx_b ; x_a = x^b _ ba [ [ structure - constants . ] ] structure constants . + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + the graded commutator for the generators is defined as : [ t_a , t_b } = t_a t_b - ( -)^ab t_b t_a we define the structure constants @xmath172 as : [ t_a , t_b } = f_ab^c t_c the identity @xmath173 follows from the graded - symmetry of the supertrace . it implies for the structure constants : ^d _ ad = f_ab^d _ dc in agreement with our conventions we define : f_abc = f_ab^d _ dc and so on . the structure constants are graded - antisymmetric in the 1 - 2 and 2 - 3 indices : f_abc = -(-)^abf_bac ; f_abc = -(-)^bc f_acb under the exchange of the first and third indices , we have : f_abc = -(-)^f_cba under cyclic permutation of their indices , the structure constant also satisfy : f_abc = ( -)^a f_bca [ [ tensor - product . ] ] tensor product . + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + the tensor product @xmath174 of two generators taken in different representation @xmath28 and @xmath78 is graded : t_a^r t_b^r = ( -)^ab ( 1^r t_b^r)(t_a^r 1^r ) in order to lighten the expressions in the bulk of the paper we often get rid of the @xmath93 symbol : t_a^r t_b^r t_a^r t_b^r = ( -)^ab t_b^r t_a^r in this appendix we give a new derivation of the tree - level gauge - covariant current algebra for the pure spinor string on @xmath7 . the method we use is inspired by the analysis of @xcite for the current algebra in sigma - models on supergroups . the different steps are the following . we make a natural ansatz for the current - current opes . then we demand that this ansatz is compatible with reparametrization invariance of the path integral , and the with maurer - cartan equation . this typically gives more constraints than the number of free coefficients in the ansatz . finally we solve these constraints to get the current algebra . this method can be generalized to compute the quantum corrections to the current algebra . this computation can be efficiently organized recursively @xcite . here we will only compute the tree - level coefficients since this is sufficient for the purpose of this article . we choose the ansatz for the current algebra , that we reproduce here for clarity : @xmath175 this ansatz is based on dimensional analysis and symmetry . we only wrote down the second- and first - order poles , but there is an infinite series of less and less singular terms that come with operators of ( classical ) dimension greater or equal to two . notice also that this ansatz is suitable for the tree - level current algebra , but it should be slightly modified if one is to take into account quantum corrections @xcite . in the following we will compute the coefficients @xmath69 s . many of these coefficient vanish trivially because the current algebra has to be compatible with the @xmath15 grading . parity also induces some redundancy in the remaining coefficients . these two symmetries leave 57 independent coefficients that we need to compute . [ [ equations - of - motion - and - path - integral - reparametrization - invariance . ] ] equations of motion and path - integral reparametrization invariance . + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + in this subsection we demand that the current algebra is compatible with the reparametrization invariance of the path integral . in particular this guarantees that the current algebra is compatible with the equations of motion . let us consider the action for the pure spinor string in @xmath7 . we consider a small variation of the group element @xmath54 parametrized by a element of the lie superalgebra @xmath171 : [ shiftg ] g = g x the variation of the currents is given by : @xmath176 & & \delta n = 0\cr & \delta \bar j = \bar \p x + [ \bar j , x ] & & \delta \hat n = 0 \end{aligned}\ ] ] we can decompose the infinitesimal shift @xmath171 on the @xmath15 subspaces of the lie superalgebra as @xmath177 . since @xmath178 generates gauge transformations that leave the action invariant , we set @xmath179 . we obtain the variation of the @xmath180 s : [ deltaj ] j_0 & = & [ j_1,x_3 ] + [ j_2,x_2 ] + [ j_3,x_3 ] j_1 & = & x_1 + [ j_0,x_1 ] + [ j_2,x_3 ] + [ j_3,x_2 ] j_2 & = & x_2 + [ j_0,x_2 ] + [ j_1,x_1 ] + [ j_3,x_3 ] j_3 & = & x_3 + [ j_0,x_3 ] + [ j_1,x_2 ] + [ j_2,x_1 ] and similarly for the @xmath181 s . we deduce the variation of the action under the infinitesimal shift of the group element : @xmath182- \frac{1}{2 } [ j_{2 } , \bar j_{1 } ] + 2[n,\bar j_3 ] - 2 [ j_3 , \hat n ] \right ) \right.\cr & + x_2 \left(- \bar \nabla j_{2 } - \nabla \bar j _ { 2 } - [ j_{1},\bar j_{1}]+ [ j_{3},\bar j_{3 } ] + 2[n,\bar j_2 ] - 2 [ j_2 , \hat n ] \right ) \cr & \left.+ x_3 \left ( -\frac{1}{2 } \bar \nabla j_{1 } - \frac{3}{2 } \nabla \bar j _ { 1 } + \frac{1}{2 } [ j_{2},\bar j_{3}]+ \frac{1}{2 } [ j_{3},\bar j_{2}]+ 2[n,\bar j_1 ] - 2 [ j_1 , \hat n]\right ) \right\ } \end{aligned}\ ] ] now we consider the following quantity : j_1(z ) = j_1(z ) e^-s where @xmath183 is the path integral measure over the fields . the previous one - point function , whatever its value is , is invariant under the reparametrization of the path integral . we further assume that the path - integral measure is also invariant under . let us mention at that point that we are simply following the method that would provide a path integral derivation of the ward identity for a global symmetry , if were indeed a global symmetry . we obtain : [ dj = jds ] j_1(z ) - j_1(z ) s = 0 it is convenient to rewrite the variation of the current as an integral over the worldsheet : j_1(z ) = d^2 w ( x_1(w ) (z - w ) + ( [ j_0(w),x_1(w)]+[j_2(w),x_3(w)]+[j_3(w),x_2(w ) ] ) ( z - w ) ) projecting equation on the @xmath15 subspaces , we obtain three operator identities : @xmath184 where the colons stand for normal ordering . next we plug the ansatz into these equations . more precisely , we use the ansatz to perform the opes on the left - hand side of the identities . since we are working at first - order in @xmath29 , the opes involving composite operators are easily dealt with : a single ope has to be taken with one or the other of the components of the composite operator . we use the equalities : _ |w = -2(z - w ) = _ w ; _ |w = 2(z - w ) = _ w we are left with some identities between operators multiplied by functions that are singular when @xmath185 . we demand that the operator identities do hold for the singular terms of order two and three : all the terms multiplying either a derivative of a delta function , a delta function , or a second - order pole shall cancel against each other . we obtain a set of linear equations that the free coefficients in the ansatz have to satisfy : @xmath186 we can play the same game replacing in equation @xmath35 by another current . for each current we obtain a new set of equations . to get more constraints for the opes involving the ghosts , we can also vary the ghosts variable instead of . in total we get 39 linear equations that the coefficients @xmath69 s in the ansatz have to satisfy . [ [ the - maurer - cartan - equation.-1 ] ] the maurer - cartan equation . + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + we can further constraint the coefficients in the ansatz by demanding compatibility with the maurer - cartan equation . projecting this equation according to the @xmath15 grading we obtain : @xmath187 + [ j_1 , \bar j_3 ] + [ j_2 , \bar j_2 ] + [ j_3 , \bar j_1 ] = 0 \cr & \p \bar j_1- \bar \p j_1 + [ j_0 , \bar j_1 ] + [ j_1 , \bar j_0 ] + [ j_2 , \bar j_3 ] + [ j_3 , \bar j_2 ] = 0 \cr & \p \bar j_2 - \bar \p j_2 + [ j_0 , \bar j_2 ] + [ j_1 , \bar j_1 ] + [ j_2 , \bar j_0 ] + [ j_3 , \bar j_3 ] = 0 \cr & \p \bar j_3 - \bar \p j_3 + [ j_0 , \bar j_3 ] + [ j_1 , \bar j_2 ] + [ j_2 , \bar j_1 ] + [ j_3 , \bar j_0 ] = 0 \end{aligned}\ ] ] the strategy is to demand that the maurer - cartan equation does hold as an operator identity . more precisely , we demand that the ope between a current and the left - hand side of does vanish . let us consider one example for illustrative purposes : we take the ope between the current @xmath35 and the left - hand side of the first line in equation : @xmath188 as previously we plug the ansatz in the previous equation , and demand that the singular terms of order three and two do vanish . we obtain the following equations : 0 = c_10^|1 + c_1 |0^|1 + c_13 0 = c_10 ^ 1 - c_1 the different lines of equation , we obtain in total 43 linear equations that the coefficients @xmath69 s in the ansatz have to satisfy . let us make a side remark here . there is no doubt that the maurer - cartan identity does hold at tree level . however it may get quantum corrections . in order to generalize the method described here to compute quantum corrections to the current algebra , one needs to assume that the maurer - cartan identity holds in the quantum theory as well . this may be interpreted as postulating quantum integrability of the model . this provides an efficient way to use quantum integrability of the model to compute the quantum current algebra . we leave it for future work . [ [ the - coefficients - of - the - current - algebra . ] ] the coefficients of the current algebra . + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + using the maurer - cartan identity and reparametrization invariance of the path integral , we find in total 82 equations that constrain the 57 independent coefficients of the current algebra . this system of equation can be easily decomposed in subsystems of eight equations or less . it is remarkable that there exists a solution to this set of equations . the non - zero coefficients are given in section [ subkalgebra ] . there is however one exception for the opes between two of the currents @xmath34 and @xmath39 . in that case the equations we obtain only provide the constraints . [ [ associativity . ] ] associativity . + + + + + + + + + + + + + + the current algebra has to be associative . associativity of the current algebra can be tested in the following way . let us consider a 3-points function , for instance : j_1(x ) j_1(y ) j_2(z ) it can be computed by taking first the ope between @xmath189 and @xmath190 , and then take the ope between the resulting current and @xmath191 . but one can also start by taking the ope between @xmath192 and @xmath191 , and then take the ope of the result with @xmath189 . the two methods lead to the same result if the coefficients of the current algebra satisfy : c_11 ^ 2 c_22 = c_12 ^ 3 c_13 we can play the same game with any three - points functions . we find a large set of constraints that are all satisfied by the current algebra obtained previously . in this section we give some details on the derivations of equations , and . we want to compute the commutator of two equal - time connections @xmath193 and @xmath100 evaluated for different values of the spectral parameter @xmath75 and @xmath84 and taken in possibly different representation @xmath28 and @xmath78 . we can deduce this commutator from the current algebra . we define the commutator of equal - time operators as : = _ 0^+ ( a(+i ) b(0 ) - b(i ) a ( ) ) from this definition we extract an operative dictionary between opes and commutators . let us consider for instance the following ope : [ abope ] a(z ) b(0 ) = + + e ^(2)(z ) + + + + + ... we deduce the commutator : [ abcom ] [ a ( ) , b(0 ) ] = c ( ) - d ( ) - f(0 ) ( ) - g(0 ) ( ) + h(0 ) ( ) + i(0 ) ( ) this dictionary shows that the first - order computation of fusion presented in section [ fusionorder1 ] is equivalent to the computation of the poisson bracket of line operators in the hamiltonian formalism . notice that the ope generically contains additional sub - leading singularities , for instance @xmath194 , or even logarithms . they do not contribute to the commutator @xcite . generically , the ope contains more information than the commutator . in order to simplify the following expressions , we write the ( spacelike component of the ) flat connection @xmath73 defined in as : @xmath195 using the previous dictionary , we obtain for the commutator of two connections : @xmath196 } [ a_r&(y;\sigma ) , a_{r'}(y';\sigma ' ) ] = \cr & 2\pi i r^{-2 } \p_\sigma \delta(\sigma- \sigma ' ) \sum_{m , n } \kappa^{b_n a_m } t_{a_m}^r t_{b_n}^{r ' } ( f_m(y)f_n(y')c_{mn } - \bar f_m(y)\bar f_n(y')c_{\bar m \bar n } ) \cr & + 2\pi i r^{-2 } \delta(\sigma- \sigma ' ) \sum_{m , n , p } { f_{c_p}}^{b_n a_m } t_{a_m}^r t_{b_n}^{r ' } k_p^{c_p } ( -f_m(y)f_n(y ' ) c_{mn}^p \cr & \hspace{2.5 cm } + f_m(y)\bar f_n(y ' ) c_{m\bar n}^p + \bar f_m(y)f_n(y ' ) c_{\bar m n}^p + \bar f_m(y ) \bar f_n(y ' ) c_{\bar m \bar n}^p ) \cr & + 2\pi i r^{-2 } \delta(\sigma- \sigma ' ) \sum_{m , n , p } { f_{c_p}}^{b_n a_m } t_{a_m}^r t_{b_n}^{r ' } \bar k_p^{c_p } ( -f_m(y)f_n(y ' ) c_{mn}^{\bar p } \cr & \hspace{2.5 cm } - f_m(y)\bar f_n(y ' ) c_{m\bar n}^{\bar p } - \bar f_m(y)f_n(y ' ) c_{\bar m n}^{\bar p } + \bar f_m(y ) \bar f_n(y ' ) c_{\bar m \bar n}^{\bar p } ) \end{aligned}\ ] ] we wish to write this commutator as a @xmath12 system . from the terms coming with a derivative of the delta function in the commutator , we can read directly the @xmath81-matrix . we obtain : s = i r^-2 _ m , n ^b_n a_m t_a_m^r t_b_n^r ( f_m(y)f_n(y)c_mn - obtain . to obtain the @xmath80 matrix , we have to compare the terms coming with a delta function in and . this leads to the following equations for the components of the @xmath80 and @xmath81 matrices : @xmath197 in the previous equations , when the indices @xmath198 take the value @xmath108 or @xmath54 , one should understand@xmath199 " and @xmath200 " as being @xmath201 , etc . remarkably , this largely over - constrained system is solved by the @xmath80 and @xmath81 matrices and . [ [ appcompkalgebras ] ] comparison with previous analyses . + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + the current - current opes were previously discussed in the literature . in @xcite the opes for the currents of non - zero grade were computed using the background field methods . some of the opes involving the grade zero currents were further given in @xcite . the results we obtained here agree with these papers . in @xcite the current algebra was also computed using feynman diagram technology . the opes do match the ones we derived here except for those involving the currents @xmath34 , @xmath39 . this is not surprising given the gauge choice that was explicitly made for the coset element in @xcite . a consequence of this discrepancy is that the commutator of equal - time connections can not be written as a @xmath12 system with the opes of @xcite . however one should keep in mind that it is only an issue of gauge fixing . indeed in @xcite the opes of @xcite were used to compute the fusion of line operators at first order . then the @xmath80 and @xmath81 matrices were deduced by comparison with the expectations from the hamiltonian formalism . these matrices agree with the ones that we derived in this paper . in @xcite the hamiltonian formalism was used to compute the commutator of equal time connections . a careful treatment of the constraints was performed . it was argued that in the hamiltonian formalism , the flat connection realizes a @xmath12 system up to constraints generating gauge transformations . it was shown that one should add to the flat connection a term proportional to the constraints so that the commutator of connections take exactly the form of a @xmath12 system . the resulting @xmath12 system is slightly different than the one used here and in @xcite . the flat connection obtained in @xcite , including the additional term proportional to the constraints , was derived from first principles in @xcite in the green - schwarz formalism . it is remarkable that the analysis of @xcite leads to the pure spinor - like flat connections of @xcite ( without the pure spinor ghosts contribution ) and not to the bena - polchinski - roiban flat connections @xcite . this provides some evidence for the equivalence of the pure spinor and green - schwarz formulations of string theory on @xmath7 . in @xcite it was shown that the @xmath12 system of @xcite has a nice algebraic interpretation . for the purposes of this paper it is important that the @xmath80 matrix found in @xcite is identical to the one we worked with in the limit where the difference of spectral parameter is small . this guarantees that the results derived in the present paper would also hold if one were to work with the @xmath12 system of @xcite . in order to reproduce the @xmath12 system found in @xcite using opes technology , the first step would be to gauge - fix the @xmath202 gauge symmetry via a brst procedure . then one should generalize the analysis of @xcite by including in the flat connections additional terms written in terms of the ghosts resulting from the @xmath202 gauge - fixing . these new connections should realize the @xmath12 system of @xcite . in this appendix we give some details about the computations of the first - order divergences in line operators . as explained in section [ worldsheettheory ] , we use a principal - value regularization scheme . a first - order pole is regularized as : p.v . = ( + ) = and a second - order pole is regularized as : p.v . = ( + ) = ] there are three sources of divergences in the transition matrices . they are depicted in figure [ divergences ] . the first divergences come from the first order poles in the ope of two neighboring connections , say @xmath203 and @xmath204 ( case in figuredivergences ) . we evaluate the resulting currents at the point @xmath205 and perform the integration over @xmath206 . we obtain a logarithmic divergences : @xmath207 where the functions @xmath208 s were defined in . the second type of divergences come from the second - order poles in the ope between two neighboring connections ( case in figuredivergences ) . after performing the integration over the positions of the two connections , we obtain a logarithmic divergence : @xmath209 notice that there is no linear divergences . this is a pleasant feature of the regularization scheme that we are using . eventually the third type of divergences come from the second - order poles in the ope between two connections that are separated by a third one sitting in between ( case in figuredivergences ) . let us denote this third connection by @xmath210 . after performing the integrations , we obtain another logarithmic divergence : @xmath211 there is some freedom in how we write the last expression since we can commute the generators in different ways . we choose a writing that is symmetric with respect to the central connection @xmath210 . starting from a transition matrix , we compute all the different opes of the types described previously that lead to divergences . next we sum all these terms . most of the terms of the type cancel against the first terms in . we obtain : @xmath212 [ [ consequences - of - the - vanishing - of - the - dual - coxeter - number . ] ] consequences of the vanishing of the dual coxeter number . + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + here we derive some identities that are useful to show the vanishing of some divergences in the line operators . these identities were first derived in @xcite . the vanishing of the dual coxeter number can be written as : [ ftt=0 ] f_c^ba[t_a , t_b } = 0 the super - jacobi identity together with the fact that @xmath213 implies : [ 13c=31c ] ^b_3 a_1[t_a_1,[t_b_3,t_c } } = ^a_1 b_3[t_b_3,[t_a_1,t_c } } the identities and further imply : @xmath214 @xmath215 @xmath216 [ [ cancellation - of - divergences . ] ] cancellation of divergences . + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + let us come back to the expression . we will now argue that the second piece of vanishes , as first shown in @xcite . using the identities and , we observe that the terms proportional to @xmath35 , @xmath40 , @xmath37 and @xmath42 vanish straight away . then using the identities together with the actual value of the coefficients of the current algebra , it is straightforward to check that the terms proportional to @xmath36 and @xmath41 also drop out . the vanishing of the terms proportional to @xmath34 , @xmath39 , @xmath38 and @xmath43 depends on the value of the simple poles in the opes @xmath217 , @xmath218 and @xmath219 . the method explained in appendix [ covcurrents ] to compute the current algebra does not fix completely these opes , but only gives the constraint . the identity combined with the value of the other coefficients of the current algebra implies the vanishing of all terms proportional to @xmath34 , @xmath39 , @xmath38 and @xmath43 provided we have : @xmath220 demanding consistency with the analysis of @xcite implies the previous equations . we deduce that only the first term in survives . we can write it as : @xmath221 so the first - order divergences in the transition matrix can be rewritten as : [ divtransition ] - \ { ^b_3 a_1 t_a_1 t_b_3 + ^b_2 a_2 t_a_2 t_b_2 + ^b_1 a_3 t_a_3 t_b_1 , t^b , a(x ) } in loop operators we have additional divergences coming from the collisions between two connections sitting on either side of the starting point of the integration contour . only the second - order pole in such a collision lead to a divergence . these divergences read : @xmath222 so the first - order divergences in the monodromy matrix add up to : @xmath223 taking the supertrace , we see that the transfer matrix is free of divergences at first order . in this appendix we give some details concerning the computation of the fusion of line operators at second order . in particular we describe the computation that leads to and . these terms are produced by triple collisions of connections . a triple collision means that we take one ope between two connections , and then take the ope of the resulting currents with a third connection . as explain in section [ recipefusion ] , one needs to disentangle two contributions from the opes . on one hand there is the contribution that gives a quantum correction associated with fusion . on the other hand there is the contribution that is interpreted as a regularized ope in the double line operator resulting from the process of fusion . in order to isolate the interesting part associated with fusion , we subtract the principal value from the singularities . we obtain : @xmath224 let us now face the computation of the individual quantum corrections that add up to and . in the first step of the computation of a triple collision we perform an ope between two connections sitting on different contours . we obtain intermediate currents that we evaluate on one of the two contours . the contour on which these intermediate currents are evaluated matters for the second step of the computation . the relevant ope for the first step of the computation is thus : @xmath225 where the index @xmath226 can take the values @xmath227 . in the following when the range of the sum for some index is not specified , it is understood that the sum runs over the set @xmath227 . the coefficients @xmath228 depends on the precise location where the currents are evaluated in the simple poles of the current algebra . from the coefficient given in section [ subkalgebra ] we can only deduce the sums @xmath229 and @xmath230 . it turns out that we do nt need more information about the coefficients @xmath228 for the purpose of this article ( see equation ) . actually what we want to compute here is not exactly the contribution of the triple collisions to the fusion of line operators . it is rather the part of this contribution that has not been taken into account by the first part of the computation described in section [ subfusion2nd ] and depicted in figure [ fuso2step1 ] . removing the piece of the triple collisions already taken into account amounts to perform the following replacement in the first ope : @xmath231 . in and the contribution from the first - order poles in the second ope is singled out . in the four other cases the contribution from the second - order poles in the second ope is considered.[alltriplecollisions ] ] now we can compute the individual terms that add up to and . these different terms are schematically depicted in figure [ alltriplecollisions ] . we compute separately the contribution of the first- and second - order poles in the second ope ( obviously only the first order poles have to be taken into account in the first ope ) . let us begin with the first - order poles in the second ope . the triple collision involves three connections , two of which are integrated on the same contour . there are two different cases . for a triple collision involving two neighboring connections on the first contour ( case in figure [ alltriplecollisions ] ) , we obtain : @xmath232 t_{b_n}^{r ' } \cr & \times ( k_r^{e_r}({\tilde{d'}}_{mn}^p f_q c_{pq}^r - { \tilde{d'}}_{mn}^p \bar f_q c_{p\bar q}^r - { \tilde{d'}}_{mn}^{\bar p } f_q c_{\bar pq}^r - { \tilde{d'}}_{mn}^{\bar p } \bar f_q c_{\bar p \bar q}^r ) \cr & \quad + \bar k_r^{e_r}({\tilde{d'}}_{mn}^p f_q c_{pq}^{\bar r } + { \tilde{d'}}_{mn}^p \bar f_q c_{p\bar q}^{\bar r } + { \tilde{d'}}_{mn}^{\bar p } f_q c_{\bar pq}^{\bar r } - { \tilde{d'}}_{mn}^{\bar p } \bar f_q c_{\bar p \bar q}^{\bar r } ) ) \end{aligned}\ ] ] where we wrote @xmath233 as a shorthand for @xmath234 . similarly we will write @xmath235 for @xmath236 . for a triple collision involving two neighboring connections on the second contour ( case in figure [ alltriplecollisions ] ) , we obtain : @xmath237 \cr & \times ( k_r^{e_r}(-{\tilde{d}}_{mn}^p f'_q c_{pq}^r + { \tilde{d}}_{mn}^p \bar f'_q c_{p\bar q}^r + { \tilde{d}}_{mn}^{\bar p } f'_q c_{\bar pq}^r + { \tilde{d}}_{mn}^{\bar p } \bar f'_q c_{\bar p \bar q}^r ) \cr & \quad + \bar k_r^{e_r}(-{\tilde{d}}_{mn}^p f'_q c_{pq}^{\bar r } - { \tilde{d}}_{mn}^p \bar f'_q c_{p\bar q}^{\bar r } - { \tilde{d}}_{mn}^{\bar p } f'_q c_{\bar pq}^{\bar r } + { \tilde{d}}_{mn}^{\bar p } \bar f'_q c_{\bar p \bar q}^{\bar r } ) ) \end{aligned}\ ] ] next we consider the second - order poles in the second ope . there are now four different cases . for a triple collision involving two neighboring connections on the first contour ( case in figure [ alltriplecollisions ] ) , we obtain : @xmath238 and for a triple collision involving two neighboring connections on the second contour ( case in figure [ alltriplecollisions ] ) , we obtain : @xmath239 we also obtain a non - zero contribution if the two connections that are on the same contour are separated by a third one . when this happens on the first contour ( case in figure [ alltriplecollisions ] ) , we obtain : @xmath240 t_{b_n}^{r ' } \cr & \quad \times ( { \tilde{d'}}_{mn}^s f_p c_{sp } - { \tilde{d'}}_{mn}^{\bar s } \bar f_p c_{\bar s\bar p } ) ( f_r k_r^{e_r } + \bar f_r \bar k_r^{e_r})\cr + ( i\pi r^{-2})^2 & \delta'_{\epsilon}(\sigma_1-\sigma')\delta_{\epsilon}(\sigma_2-\sigma ' ) \frac{1}{2 } \sum_{n , p , q=0}^3\sum_{m , r , s } { f_{c_p}}^{b_n a_m } { f_{e_r}}^{c_p d_q } \ { t_{d_q}^r , t_{a_m}^r ] t_{b_n}^{r ' } \cr & \quad \times ( { \tilde{d'}}_{pn}^s f_m c_{sm } - { \tilde{d'}}_{pn}^{\bar s } \bar f_m c_{\bar s\bar m } ) ( f_r k_r^{e_r } + \bar f_r \bar k_r^{e_r})\end{aligned}\ ] ] finally for two connections separated by a third one in the second contour ( case in figure [ alltriplecollisions ] ) , we obtain : @xmath241 \cr & \quad \times ( { \tilde{d}}_{mn}^s f'_p c_{sp } - { \tilde{d}}_{mn}^{\bar s } \bar f'_p c_{\bar s\bar p } ) ( f'_r k_r^{e_r } + \bar f'_r \bar k_r^{e_r})\cr + ( i\pi r^{-2})^2 & \delta'_{\epsilon}(\sigma'_1-\sigma)\delta_{\epsilon}(\sigma'_2-\sigma ) \frac{1}{2 } \sum_{n , p , q=0}^3 \sum_{m , r , s } { f_{c_p}}^{b_n a_m } { f_{e_r}}^{d_q c_p } t_{a_m}^r \ { t_{b_n}^{r'},t_{d_q}^{r ' } ] \cr & \quad \times ( { \tilde{d}}_{pn}^s f'_m c_{sm } - { \tilde{d}}_{pn}^{\bar s } \bar f'_m c_{\bar s\bar m } ) ( f'_r k_r^{e_r } + \bar f'_r \bar k_r^{e_r})\\end{aligned}\ ] ] next we have to perform the integration over the free coordinates in the previous results . the integrals over the regularized delta functions provide a well - defined answer . this is an advantage of the ope formalism with respect to the hamiltonian formalism . the integrals needed are given below . the results are given in the limit @xmath242 . @xmath243 @xmath244 @xmath245 it is sometimes convenient to write @xmath246 as @xmath247 . notice that the integral over the squared regularized delta function is divergent in the limit @xmath242 : _ c^d d ^2_(_2- ) = |[a , b]| where we denoted by @xmath248\cap[c , d]|$ ] the length of the overlap of the intervals @xmath85 $ ] and @xmath98 $ ] . similarly we have : @xmath249 where we can also replace @xmath250 by @xmath251 . finally we can sum the various contributions from triple collisions . the terms of the form combined with the second and third terms of lead to : @xmath252\cap[c , d]}d\sigma \left \lfloor \int_\sigma^b a \right\rceil^i \left \lfloor \int_\sigma^d a ' \right\rceil^{i ' } \cr & \times ( i\pi r^{-2})^2 \tilde{\sum_{m , n , p , q , r } } { f_{c_p}}^{b_n a_m } { f_{e_r}}^{c_p d_q } \ { t_{d_q}^r , t_{a_m}^r ] t_{b_n}^{r ' } \cr & \quad \times ( k_r^{e_r}({\tilde{d'}}_{mn}^p f_q c_{pq}^r - { \tilde{d'}}_{mn}^p \bar f_q c_{p\bar q}^r - { \tilde{d'}}_{mn}^{\bar p } f_q c_{\bar pq}^r - { \tilde{d'}}_{mn}^{\bar p } \bar f_q c_{\bar p \bar q}^r \cr & \quad \quad\quad+ \frac{1}{2 } f_r \sum_s ( { \tilde{d'}}_{mn}^s f_p c_{sp } + { \tilde{d'}}_{pn}^s f_m c_{sm } - { \tilde{d'}}_{mn}^{\bar s } \bar f_p c_{\bar s\bar p } - { \tilde{d'}}_{pn}^{\bar s } \bar f_m c_{\bar s\bar m } ) ) \cr & \quad\quad + \bar k_r^{e_r}({\tilde{d'}}_{mn}^p f_q c_{pq}^{\bar r } + { \tilde{d'}}_{mn}^p \bar f_q c_{p\bar q}^{\bar r } + { \tilde{d'}}_{mn}^{\bar p } f_q c_{\bar pq}^{\bar r } - { \tilde{d'}}_{mn}^{\bar p } \bar f_q c_{\bar p \bar q}^{\bar r } \cr & \quad\quad\quad+ \frac{1}{2 } \bar f_r \sum_s ( { \tilde{d'}}_{mn}^s f_p c_{sp } + { \tilde{d'}}_{pn}^s f_m c_{sm } - { \tilde{d'}}_{mn}^{\bar s } \bar f_p c_{\bar s\bar p } - { \tilde{d'}}_{pn}^{\bar s } \bar f_m c_{\bar s\bar m } ) ) ) \cr & \times \left \lfloor \int_a^\sigma a \right\rceil^{m - i } \left \lfloor \int_c^\sigma a ' \right\rceil^{m'-i ' } \end{aligned}\ ] ] in order to shorten the previous expression we introduce the symbol @xmath253 with the following meaning : for each term in the expression , the lower indices of a coefficient @xmath254 have to be summed over the values @xmath255 , while all other indices have to be summed over the values @xmath227 . similarly the terms of the form combined with the second and third terms of lead to : @xmath256\cap[c , d]}d\sigma \left \lfloor \int_\sigma^b a \right\rceil^i \left \lfloor \int_\sigma^d a ' \right\rceil^{i ' } \cr & \times ( i\pi r^{-2})^2 \tilde{\sum_{m , n , p , q , r } } { f_{c_p}}^{b_n a_m } { f_{e_r}}^ { d_q c_p } t_{a_m}^r \ { t_{b_n}^{r ' } , t_{d_q}^{r ' } ] \cr & \quad \times ( k_r^{e_r}(-{\tilde{d}}_{mn}^p f'_q c_{pq}^r + { \tilde{d}}_{mn}^p \bar f'_q c_{p\bar q}^r + { \tilde{d}}_{mn}^{\bar p } f'_q c_{\bar pq}^r + { \tilde{d}}_{mn}^{\bar p } \bar f'_q c_{\bar p \bar q}^r \cr & \quad \quad\quad- \frac{1}{2 } f'_r \sum_s ( { \tilde{d}}_{mn}^s f'_p c_{sp } + { \tilde{d}}_{pn}^s f'_m c_{sm } - { \tilde{d}}_{mn}^{\bar s } \bar f'_p c_{\bar s\bar p } - { \tilde{d}}_{pn}^{\bar s } \bar f'_m c_{\bar s\bar m } ) ) \cr & \quad\quad + \bar k_r^{e_r}(-{\tilde{d}}_{mn}^p f'_q c_{pq}^{\bar r } - { \tilde{d}}_{mn}^p \bar f'_q c_{p\bar q}^{\bar r } - { \tilde{d}}_{mn}^{\bar p } f'_q c_{\bar pq}^{\bar r } + { \tilde{d}}_{mn}^{\bar p } \bar f'_q c_{\bar p \bar q}^{\bar r } ) \cr & \quad\quad\quad- \frac{1}{2 } \bar f'_r \sum_s ( { \tilde{d}}_{mn}^s f'_p c_{sp } + { \tilde{d}}_{pn}^s f'_m c_{sm } - { \tilde{d}}_{mn}^{\bar s } \bar f'_p c_{\bar s\bar p } - { \tilde{d}}_{pn}^{\bar s } \bar f'_m c_{\bar s\bar m } ) ) ) \cr & \times \left \lfloor \int_a^\sigma a \right\rceil^{m - i } \left \lfloor \int_c^\sigma a ' \right\rceil^{m'-i ' } \end{aligned}\ ] ] the sum of and leads to where the operator @xmath116 is given by : @xmath257 t_{b_n}^{r ' } \cr & \quad \times ( k_r^{e_r}({\tilde{d'}}_{mn}^p f_q c_{pq}^r - { \tilde{d'}}_{mn}^p \bar f_q c_{p\bar q}^r - { \tilde{d'}}_{mn}^{\bar p } f_q c_{\bar pq}^r - { \tilde{d'}}_{mn}^{\bar p } \bar f_q c_{\bar p \bar q}^r \cr & \quad \quad\quad+ \frac{1}{2 } f_r \sum_s ( { \tilde{d'}}_{mn}^s f_p c_{sp } + { \tilde{d'}}_{pn}^s f_m c_{sm } - { \tilde{d'}}_{mn}^{\bar s } \bar f_p c_{\bar s\bar p } - { \tilde{d'}}_{pn}^{\bar s } \bar f_m c_{\bar s\bar m } ) ) \cr & \quad\quad + \bar k_r^{e_r}({\tilde{d'}}_{mn}^p f_q c_{pq}^{\bar r } + { \tilde{d'}}_{mn}^p \bar f_q c_{p\bar q}^{\bar r } + { \tilde{d'}}_{mn}^{\bar p } f_q c_{\bar pq}^{\bar r } - { \tilde{d'}}_{mn}^{\bar p } \bar f_q c_{\bar p \bar q}^{\bar r } \cr & \quad\quad\quad+ \frac{1}{2 } \bar f_r \sum_s ( { \tilde{d'}}_{mn}^s f_p c_{sp } + { \tilde{d'}}_{pn}^s f_m c_{sm } - { \tilde{d'}}_{mn}^{\bar s } \bar f_p c_{\bar s\bar p } - { \tilde{d'}}_{pn}^{\bar s } \bar f_m c_{\bar s\bar m})))\cr % & + { f_{c_p}}^{b_n a_m } { f_{e_r}}^ { d_q c_p } t_{a_m}^r \ { t_{b_n}^{r ' } , t_{d_q}^{r ' } ] \cr & \quad \times ( k_r^{e_r}(-{\tilde{d}}_{mn}^p f'_q c_{pq}^r + { \tilde{d}}_{mn}^p \bar f'_q c_{p\bar q}^r + { \tilde{d}}_{mn}^{\bar p } f'_q c_{\bar pq}^r + { \tilde{d}}_{mn}^{\bar p } \bar f'_q c_{\bar p \bar q}^r \cr & \quad \quad\quad- \frac{1}{2 } f'_r \sum_s ( { \tilde{d}}_{mn}^s f'_p c_{sp } + { \tilde{d}}_{pn}^s f'_m c_{sm } - { \tilde{d}}_{mn}^{\bar s } \bar f'_p c_{\bar s\bar p } - { \tilde{d}}_{pn}^{\bar s } \bar f'_m c_{\bar s\bar m } ) ) \cr & \quad\quad + \bar k_r^{e_r}(-{\tilde{d}}_{mn}^p f'_q c_{pq}^{\bar r } - { \tilde{d}}_{mn}^p \bar f'_q c_{p\bar q}^{\bar r } - { \tilde{d}}_{mn}^{\bar p } f'_q c_{\bar pq}^{\bar r } + { \tilde{d}}_{mn}^{\bar p } \bar f'_q c_{\bar p \bar q}^{\bar r } ) \cr & \quad\quad\quad- \frac{1}{2 } \bar f'_r \sum_s ( { \tilde{d}}_{mn}^s f'_p c_{sp } + { \tilde{d}}_{pn}^s f'_m c_{sm } - { \tilde{d}}_{mn}^{\bar s } \bar f'_p c_{\bar s\bar p } - { \tilde{d}}_{pn}^{\bar s } \bar f'_m c_{\bar s\bar m})))\end{aligned}\ ] ] the combination of the terms and together with the first terms of and simplifies to : @xmath258 this can be rewritten as where the matrix @xmath119 is given by : @xmath259 for the purposes of this paper it is interesting to take the limit where the difference of spectral parameters is small . more precisely we assume that the difference @xmath261 is of order @xmath262 . in this limit one term dominates the previous result . this follows essentially from the observation that the @xmath80 matrix satisfies . in the limit @xmath260 , the @xmath80 matrix is no longer of order @xmath29 but rather of order @xmath263 . consequently the coefficients @xmath264 introduced in behave like : @xmath265 using equation , we deduce that simplifies to : @xmath266\cap[c , d]}d\sigma \left \lfloor \int_\sigma^b a \right\rceil^i \left \lfloor \int_\sigma^d a ' \right\rceil^{i ' } \cr & \times ( i\pi r^{-2})^2 \sum_{m , n , p , q=0}^3\sum_{r } { f_{c_p}}^{b_n a_m } { f_{e_r}}^{c_p d_q } \ { t_{d_q}^r , t_{a_m}^r ] t_{b_n}^{r ' } \cr & \quad \times \left ( -\frac{1}{16}\frac{y^2(y^2+y^{-2})^4}{y - y'}\right ) \left(\p_y f_r(y ) k_r^{e_r } + \p_y \bar f_r(y ) \bar k_r^{e_r}\right ) \cr & \times \left \lfloor \int_a^\sigma a \right\rceil^{m - i } \left \lfloor \int_c^\sigma a ' \right\rceil^{m'-i ' } + \mathcal{o}(r^{-4})\end{aligned}\ ] ] remarkably the combination of currents that factors out is the derivative of the components of the flat connection with respect to the spectral parameter . similarly simplifies to : @xmath267\cap[c , d]}d\sigma \left \lfloor \int_\sigma^b a \right\rceil^i \left \lfloor \int_\sigma^d a ' \right\rceil^{i ' } \cr & \times ( i\pi r^{-2})^2 \sum_{m , n , p , q=0}^3\sum_{r } { f_{c_p}}^{b_n a_m } { f_{e_r}}^ { d_q c_p } t_{a_m}^r \ { t_{b_n}^{r ' } , t_{d_q}^{r ' } ] \cr & \quad \times \left ( -\frac{1}{16}\frac{y^2(y^2+y^{-2})^4}{y - y'}\right ) \left(\p_y f_r(y ) k_r^{e_r } + \p_y \bar f_r(y ) \bar k_r^{e_r}\right ) \cr & \times \left \lfloor \int_a^\sigma a \right\rceil^{m - i } \left \lfloor \int_c^\sigma a ' \right\rceil^{m'-i ' } + \mathcal{o}(r^{-4})\end{aligned}\ ] ] so the operator @xmath116 becomes : @xmath268 t_{b_n}^{r ' } + { f_{c_p}}^{b_n a_m } { f_{e_r}}^ { d_q c_p } t_{a_m}^r \ { t_{b_n}^{r ' } , t_{d_q}^{r ' } ] \right ) + \mathcal{o}(r^{0})\end{aligned}\ ] ] eventually the term remains of order @xmath55 , since : [ tttildelim ] -_mn^p f_q c_pq + _ mn^|p |f_q c_|p|q -_rm^p f_q c_pq + _ rm^|p |f_q c_|p|q = 0 + ( r^-4 ) consequently the matrix @xmath119 defined in remains of order one . actually it might be that the term and thus the matrix @xmath119 cancel exactly . this could be decided by computing the coefficients of the derivatives of the currents in the current - current opes . j. m. maldacena , `` the large n limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity , '' adv . * 2 * ( 1998 ) 231 [ int . j. theor . * 38 * ( 1999 ) 1113 ] [ arxiv : hep - th/9711200 ] . s. s. gubser , i. r. klebanov , a. m. polyakov , `` gauge theory correlators from noncritical string theory , '' phys . * b428 * ( 1998 ) 105 - 114 . [ hep - th/9802109 ] . n. gromov , v. kazakov and p. vieira , `` exact spectrum of anomalous dimensions of planar n=4 supersymmetric yang - mills theory , '' phys . * 103 * , 131601 ( 2009 ) [ arxiv:0901.3753 [ hep - th ] ] . n. beisert , b. eden , m. staudacher , `` transcendentality and crossing , '' j. stat . mech . * 0701 * ( 2007 ) p01021 . [ hep - th/0610251 ] . n. gromov , v. kazakov , p. vieira , `` exact spectrum of planar @xmath269 supersymmetric yang - mills theory : konishi dimension at any coupling , '' phys . * 104 * ( 2010 ) 211601 . [ arxiv:0906.4240 [ hep - th ] ] . n. gromov , v. kazakov , a. kozak , p. vieira , `` exact spectrum of anomalous dimensions of planar n = 4 supersymmetric yang - mills theory : tba and excited states , '' lett . * 91 * ( 2010 ) 265 - 287 . [ arxiv:0902.4458 [ hep - th ] ] . v. v. bazhanov , s. l. lukyanov , a. b. zamolodchikov , `` integrable structure of conformal field theory , quantum kdv theory and thermodynamic bethe ansatz , '' commun . * 177 * ( 1996 ) 381 - 398 . [ hep - th/9412229 ] v. kazakov and p. vieira , `` from characters to quantum ( super)spin chains via fusion , '' jhep * 0810 * ( 2008 ) 050 [ arxiv:0711.2470 [ hep - th ] ] . r. benichou , `` fusion of line operators in conformal sigma - models on supergroups , and the hirota equation , '' jhep * 1101 * ( 2011 ) 066 . [ arxiv:1011.3158 [ hep - th ] ] n. berkovits , `` super - poincare covariant quantization of the superstring , '' jhep * 0004 * ( 2000 ) 018 [ arxiv : hep - th/0001035 ] . n. berkovits , `` quantum consistency of the superstring in ads(5 ) x s**5 background , '' jhep * 0503 * ( 2005 ) 041 [ arxiv : hep - th/0411170 ] . l. mazzucato , `` superstrings in ads , '' [ arxiv:1104.2604 [ hep - th ] ] . v. g. m. puletti , `` operator product expansion for pure spinor superstring on ads(5 ) x s**5 , '' jhep * 0610 * ( 2006 ) 057 [ arxiv : hep - th/0607076 ] . v. g. m. puletti , `` aspects of quantum integrability for pure spinor superstring in ads(5 ) x s**5 , '' jhep * 0809 * ( 2008 ) 070 . [ arxiv:0808.0282 [ hep - th ] ] . o. a. bedoya , d. z. marchioro , d. l. nedel and b. c. vallilo , `` quantum current algebra for the @xmath7 superstring , '' arxiv:1003.0701 [ hep - th ] . r. r. metsaev and a. a. tseytlin , `` type iib superstring action in ads(5 ) x s(5 ) background , '' nucl . b * 533 * ( 1998 ) 109 [ arxiv : hep - th/9805028 ] . i. bena , j. polchinski and r. roiban , `` hidden symmetries of the ads(5 ) x s**5 superstring , '' phys . d * 69 * ( 2004 ) 046002 [ arxiv : hep - th/0305116 ] . b. c. vallilo , `` flat currents in the classical ads(5 ) x s**5 pure spinor superstring , '' jhep * 0403 * ( 2004 ) 037 [ arxiv : hep - th/0307018 ] . a. mikhailov , s. schafer - nameki , `` algebra of transfer - matrices and yang - baxter equations on the string worldsheet in ads(5 ) x s(5 ) , '' nucl . * b802 * ( 2008 ) 1 - 39 . [ arxiv:0712.4278 [ hep - th ] ] . k. zarembo , `` strings on semisymmetric superspaces , '' arxiv:1003.0465 [ hep - th ] . d. bombardelli , d. fioravanti , r. tateo , `` tba and y - system for planar ads(4)/cft(3 ) , '' nucl . * b834 * ( 2010 ) 543 - 561 . [ arxiv:0912.4715 [ hep - th ] ] . n. berkovits , c. vafa and e. witten , `` conformal field theory of ads background with ramond - ramond flux , '' jhep * 9903 * ( 1999 ) 018 [ arxiv : hep - th/9902098 ] . a. pakman , l. rastelli , s. s. razamat , `` a spin chain for the symmetric product cft(2 ) , '' jhep * 1005 * ( 2010 ) 099 . [ arxiv:0912.0959 [ hep - th ] ] . n. berkovits , `` quantization of the type ii superstring in a curved six - dimensional background , '' nucl . b * 565 * ( 2000 ) 333 [ arxiv : hep - th/9908041 ] . n. berkovits , m. bershadsky , t. hauer , s. zhukov and b. zwiebach , `` superstring theory on ads(2 ) x s(2 ) as a coset supermanifold , '' nucl . b * 567 * ( 2000 ) 61 [ arxiv : hep - th/9907200 ] . c. a. s. young , `` non - local charges , z(m ) gradings and coset space actions , '' phys . b * 632 * , 559 ( 2006 ) [ arxiv : hep - th/0503008 ] . i. adam , a. dekel , l. mazzucato and y. oz , `` integrability of type ii superstrings on ramond - ramond backgrounds in various dimensions , '' jhep * 0706 * ( 2007 ) 085 [ arxiv : hep - th/0702083 ] . g. parisi , n. sourlas , `` self avoiding walk and supersymmetry , '' j. phys . * 41 * ( 1980 ) 403 . m. r. zirnbauer , `` conformal field theory of the integer quantum hall plateau transition , '' arxiv : hep - th/9905054 . m. bershadsky , s. zhukov and a. vaintrob , `` psl(n|n ) sigma model as a conformal field theory , '' nucl . b * 559 * ( 1999 ) 205 [ arxiv : hep - th/9902180 ] . a. babichenko , `` conformal invariance and quantum integrability of sigma models on symmetric superspaces , '' phys . b * 648 * , 254 ( 2007 ) [ arxiv : hep - th/0611214 ] . c. candu , t. creutzig , v. mitev , v. schomerus , `` cohomological reduction of sigma models , '' jhep * 1005 * ( 2010 ) 047 . [ arxiv:1001.1344 [ hep - th ] ] . s. k. ashok , r. benichou and j. troost , `` conformal current algebra in two dimensions , '' arxiv:0903.4277 [ hep - th ] . r. benichou and j. troost , `` the conformal current algebra on supergroups with applications to the spectrum and integrability , '' arxiv:1002.3712 [ hep - th ] . s. k. ashok , r. benichou and j. troost , `` asymptotic symmetries of string theory on ads3 x s3 with ramond - ramond fluxes , '' jhep * 0910 * ( 2009 ) 051 [ arxiv:0907.1242 [ hep - th ] ] . b. c. vallilo , l. mazzucato , `` the konishi multiplet at strong coupling , '' [ arxiv:1102.1219 [ hep - th ] ] . Abstract:

Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.

Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered . Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video . Paper: gdel s completeness theorem ( for first - order classical logic ) is one of the most important theorems in logic . it is concerned with a duality ( in a naive sense ) between proofs and models : for every proposition @xmath0 , _ either@xmath4or@xmath5 . _ here @xmath1 ranges over the set of proofs , @xmath2 over the class of models , and @xmath6 reads `` @xmath1 is a proof of @xmath0 . '' one can imagine a debate on a general proposition @xmath0 , where player tries to justify @xmath0 by giving a proof and opponent tries to refute it by giving a countermodel . the completeness theorem states that exactly one of them wins . actually , the theorem gives us far more insights than stated . -12 pt**finite proofs vs infinite models:**a very crucial point is that proofs are always finite , while models can be of arbitrary cardinality . completeness thus implies compactness and lwenheim - skolem theorems , leading to constructions of various nonstandard models . 2 . -12 pt**nondeterministic principles : * * proof of gdel s completeness theorem relies on a strong nondeterministic principle such as knig s or zorn s lemma , in contrast to the trivial completeness theorem with respect to the class of boolean algebras . -12 pt**matching of two inductions:**__provability _ _ is defined by induction on proofs , while _ truth _ by induction on formulas . the two inductions are somehow ascribed to the essence of syntax and semantics , respectively , and the completeness theorem states that they do match . unlike the real debate , however , there is no interaction between proofs and models in gdel s theorem . a more interactive account of completeness is given by girard s _ ludics _ ( @xcite ; see @xcite for good expositions ) . ludics is a variant of game semantics , which has the following prominent features . 1 . -12 pt**monism : * * proofs and models are not distinguished by their ontological status , but by their structural properties . the common objects are called _ designs_. 2 . -12 pt**existentialism : * * _ behaviours _ ( semantic types ) are built from designs , in contrast to the ordinary game semantics ( hyland - ong @xcite ) where one begins with the definition of arenas ( types ) and then proceeds to strategies ( proofs ) . -12 pt**normalization as interaction : * * designs ( hence proofs and models ) interact together via normalization . it induces an _ orthogonality relation _ between designs in such a way that @xmath7 holds if the normalization of @xmath1 applied to @xmath2 converges . a behaviour @xmath0 is defined to be a set of designs which is equivalent to its biorthogonal ( @xmath8 ) . in this setting , girard shows a completeness theorem for proofs @xcite , which roughly claims that any `` winning '' design in a behaviour is a proof of it . in view of the interactive definition of behaviour , it can be rephrased as follows : for every ( logical ) behaviour @xmath0 and every ( proof - like ) design @xmath1 , _ either@xmath6or@xmath9 and @xmath2 defeats @xmath1 ) . _ here , `` @xmath10 '' means @xmath11 , and `` @xmath2 defeats @xmath1 '' means @xmath12 . hence the right disjunct is equivalent to @xmath13 . namely , @xmath14 if and only if @xmath6 , that is a typical full completeness statement . notice that @xmath10 no more entails absolute unprovability of @xmath0 ( it is rather relativized to each @xmath1 ) , and there is a real interaction between proofs and models . actually , girard s original ludics is so limited that it corresponds to a polarized fragment of multiplicative additive linear logic , which is too weak to be a stand - alone logical system . as a consequence , one does not really observe an opposition between finite proofs and infinite models , since one can always assume that the countermodel @xmath2 is finite ( related to the finite model property for @xmath15 @xcite ) . indeed , proving the above completeness is easy once _ internal completeness _ ( a form of completeness which does not refer to any proof system @xcite ) for each logical connective has been established . in this paper , we employ a term syntax for designs introduced in @xcite , and extend girard s ludics with duplication ( contraction ) and its dual : universal nondeterminism ( see @xcite and references therein ) . although our term approach disregards some interesting locativity - related phenomena ( normalization as merging of orders and different sorts of tensors @xcite ) , our calculus is easier to manipulate and closer to the tradition of @xmath16 , @xmath17 , @xmath18 , @xmath19-calculi and other more recent syntaxes for focalized classical logic ( @xcite ) . our resulting framework is as strong as a polarized fragment of linear logic with exponentials ( @xcite ; see also @xcite ) , which is in turn as strong as a constructive version of classical propositional logic . we then prove the completeness theorem above in this extended setting . here , universal nondeterminism is needed on the model side to well interact with duplicative designs on the proof side . this is comparable to the need of noninnocent " ( and sometimes even nondeterministic ) opponents to have full completeness with respect to deterministic , but nonlinear player s strategies . unlike before , we can not anymore assume the finiteness of models , since they are not sufficient to refute infinite proof attempts . as a result , our proof is nontrivial , even after the internal completeness theorem has been proved . indeed , our proof exhibits a striking similarity with schtte s proof of gdel s completeness theorem @xcite . given a ( proof - like ) design @xmath1 which is not a proof of @xmath0 , we explicitly construct a countermodel @xmath2 in @xmath20 which defeats @xmath1 , essentially using knig s lemma . soundness is proved by induction on proofs , while completeness is by induction on types . thus our theorem gives matching of two inductions . finally , it implies an analogue of lwenheim - skolem theorem , ( and also the finite model property for the linear fragment ) , which well illustrates the opposition between finite proofs and infinite models with arbitrary cardinality . in game semantics , one finds a number of similar full completeness results . however , the connection with gdel s completeness seems less conspicuous than ours . typically , innocent strategies in hyland - ong games most naturally correspond to _ bhm trees _ , which can be _ infinite _ ( @xcite ) . thus , in contrast to our result , one has to impose finiteness / compactness on strategies in an external way , in order to have a correspondence with _ finite _ @xmath16-terms . although this is also the case in @xcite , we show that such a finiteness assumption is not needed in ludics : infinitary proof attempts are always defeated by infinitary models . the paper is organized as follows . in section [ s - prelim ] we describe the syntax of ( untyped ) designs ; in section [ s - behaviour ] we move to a typed setting and introduce behaviours ( semantic types ) . in section [ s - full ] we introduce our proof system and prove completeness for proofs . finally , section [ s - conclusion ] concludes the paper . in this paper , we employ a process calculus notation for designs , inspired by the close relationship between ludics and linear @xmath19-calculus @xcite . precisely , we extend the syntax introduced by the second author @xcite adding a ( universal ) nondeterministic choice operator @xmath21 . although @xcite mainly deals with linear designs , its syntax is designed to deal with nonlinear ones without any difficulty . however , in order to obtain _ completeness _ , we also need to incorporate the dual of nonlinearity , that is _ universal nondeterminism _ @xcite . it is reminiscent of differential linear logic @xcite , which has nondeterministic sum as the dual of contraction ; the duality is essential for the separation property @xcite ( see also @xcite for separation of bhm trees ) . a similar situation also arises in hyland - ong game semantics @xcite , where _ nonlinear _ strategies for player may contain a play in which opponent behaves _ noninnocently _ ; opponent s noninnocence is again essential for full completeness . designs are built over a given _ signature _ @xmath22 , where @xmath23 is a set of _ names _ @xmath24 and @xmath25 is a function which assigns to each name @xmath26 its _ arity _ @xmath27 . let @xmath28 be a countable set of variables @xmath29 . over a fixed signature @xmath30 , a _ positive action _ is @xmath31 with @xmath32 , and a _ negative action _ is @xmath33 where variables @xmath34 are distinct and @xmath35 . we often abbreviate a sequence of variables @xmath36 by @xmath37 . in the sequel , we always assume that an expression of the form @xmath38 stands for a negative action , @xmath39 and @xmath37 is a sequence consisting of @xmath40 distinct variables . if @xmath26 is a nullary name we simply write @xmath26 for the negative action on name @xmath26 . [ designs ] for a fixed signature @xmath30 , the class of * positive designs * @xmath41 , that of * predesigns * @xmath42 , and that of * negative designs * @xmath43 are _ coinductively _ defined as follows : @xmath44 where : 1 . @xmath45 ; 2 . @xmath46 and the formal sum @xmath47 has @xmath48-many components @xmath49 ; 3 . @xmath50 is built from a set @xmath51 of predesigns with @xmath52 an arbitrary index set . we denote arbitrary designs by @xmath53 . the set of * designs * , consisting of all positive , negative and predesigns , is denoted by @xmath54 . any subterm @xmath55 of @xmath56 is equivalently called a _ subdesign _ of @xmath56 . notice that designs are _ coinductively _ defined objects . in particular , infinitary designs are included in our syntax , just as in the original ludics @xcite . it is strictly necessary , since we want to express both proof attempts and countermodels as designs , both of which tend to be infinite . informally , designs may be regarded as infinitary @xmath16-terms with _ named _ applications , _ named _ and _ superimposed _ abstractions and a _ universal nondeterministic _ choice operator @xmath21 . more specifically , a predesign @xmath57 can be thought of as iterated application @xmath58 of an @xmath40-ary name @xmath32 . in the sequel , we may abbreviate @xmath59 by @xmath60 . if @xmath26 is a nullary name we simply write @xmath61 . on the other hand , a negative design of the form @xmath62 can be thought of as iterated abstraction @xmath63 of an @xmath40-ary name @xmath32 . a family @xmath64 of abstractions indexed by @xmath23 is then superimposed to form a negative design @xmath47 . since @xmath47 is built from a family indexed by @xmath23 , there can not be any overlapping of name in the sum . each @xmath62 is called an ( additive ) * component*. a predesign is called a * cut * if it is of the form @xmath65 . otherwise , it is of the form @xmath66 and called a * head normal form*. as we shall see in detail in subsection [ normalization subsection ] , cuts have substantial computational significance in our setting : in fact a cut @xmath67 can be _ reduced _ to another design @xmath68 $ ] . namely , when the application is of name @xmath69 , one picks up the component @xmath70 from the family @xmath64 . notice that the arities of @xmath71 and @xmath72 always agree . then , one applies a simultaneous @xmath73-reduction " @xmath74 $ ] . the _ head variable _ @xmath75 in an head normal form @xmath66 plays the same role as a pointer in a strategy does in hyland - ong games and an address ( or locus ) in girard s ludics . on the other hand , a variable @xmath75 occurring in a bracket as in @xmath76 @xmath77 , @xmath75 , @xmath78 does not correspond to a pointer nor address . rather , it corresponds to an identity axiom ( initial sequent ) in sequent calculus , and for this reason is called an * identity*. if a negative design @xmath79 simply consists of a variable @xmath75 , then @xmath79 is itself an identity . the positive design @xmath80 denotes _ divergence _ ( or _ partiality _ ) of the computation , in the sense we will make more precise in the next subsection . we also use @xmath80 to encode partial sums . given a set @xmath81 of negative actions with distinct names @xmath82 , we write @xmath83 to denote the negative design @xmath84 , where @xmath85 if @xmath86 , and @xmath87 otherwise . we also use an informal notation @xmath88 to denote @xmath83 . so far , the syntax we are describing is essentially the same as the one introduced in @xcite . a novelty of this paper is the nondeterministic conjunction operator @xmath21 , which allows us to build a positive design @xmath50 from a set @xmath51 of predesigns with @xmath52 an arbitrary index set . each @xmath89 is called a * conjunct * of @xmath1 . we write @xmath90 ( * daimon * ) for the empty conjunction @xmath91 . this design plays an essential role in ludics , since it is used to define the concept of orthogonality . although @xmath90 is usually given as a primitive ( see @xcite ) , we have found it convenient and natural to identify ( or rather encode ) @xmath90 with the empty conjunction . as we shall see , its computational meaning exactly corresponds to the usual one : @xmath90 marks the _ termination _ of a computation . put in another way , our nondeterministic conjunction can be seen as a generalization of the termination mark . a design @xmath56 may contain free and bound variables . an occurrence of subterm @xmath62 _ binds _ the free variables @xmath37 in @xmath92 . variables which are not under the scope of the binder @xmath93 are _ free_. we denote by @xmath94 the set of free variables occurring in @xmath56 . as in @xmath16-calculus , we would like to identify two designs which are _ @xmath95-equivalent _ up to renaming of bound variables . but it is more subtle than usual , since we also would like to identify , @xmath96 with @xmath97 whenever @xmath98 and @xmath99 are @xmath95-equivalent . to enforce these requirements simultaneously and hereditarily , we define an equivalence relation by coinduction . by _ renaming _ we mean a function @xmath100 . we write @xmath101 for the identity renaming , and @xmath102 $ ] for the renaming that agrees with @xmath103 except that @xmath102(x)=z$ ] . the set of renamings is denoted by @xmath104 . [ d - alpha ] a binary relation @xmath105 is called a * design equivalence * if for any @xmath106 such that @xmath107 , one of the following holds : 1 . @xmath108 ; 2 . @xmath109 , @xmath110 and we have : a. for any @xmath111 there is @xmath112 such that @xmath113 , b. for any @xmath112 there is @xmath111 such that @xmath113 ; 3 . @xmath114 , @xmath115 and @xmath116 for every @xmath117 ; 4 . @xmath118 , @xmath119 and @xmath120 ; 5 . @xmath121 , @xmath122 and @xmath123 ) { \ ; \cr\ ; } ( q_a , \rho[\vec{z}_a/\vec{y}_a])$ ] for every @xmath32 and some vector @xmath124 of fresh variables . we say that two designs @xmath56 and @xmath55 are _ equivalent _ if there is a design equivalence @xmath125 such that @xmath126 . see @xcite for further details . henceforth we _ always _ identify two designs @xmath56 and @xmath55 , and write @xmath127 by abuse of notation , if they are equivalent in the above sense . the following lemma is a straightforward extension of lemma 2.6 of @xcite . it makes it easier to prove equivalence of two designs ( just as the `` bisimulation up - to '' technique in concurrency theory makes it easier to prove bisimilarity of two processes ) . [ l - equiv ] let @xmath125 be a binary relation on designs such that if @xmath128 then one of the following holds : 1 . @xmath108 ; 2 . @xmath109 , @xmath110 , and we have : 1 . for any @xmath111 there is @xmath112 such that @xmath129 , 2 . for any @xmath112 there is @xmath111 such that @xmath129 ; 3 . @xmath114 , @xmath115 and @xmath130 for every @xmath117 ; 4 . @xmath131 ; 5 . @xmath132 , @xmath133 and @xmath134 for every @xmath32 . if @xmath135 , then @xmath56 and @xmath55 are equivalent . as a notational convention , a unary conjunction @xmath136 is simply written as @xmath98 this allows us to treat a predesign as a positive design . we also write : 1 . @xmath137 if @xmath1 is a conjunction and @xmath98 is a conjunct of @xmath1 ; 2 . @xmath138 if _ either _ @xmath139 , _ or _ both @xmath1 and @xmath140 are conjunctions and for all @xmath141 , @xmath137 . thus @xmath138 indicates that @xmath1 has more conjuncts than @xmath140 unless @xmath139 . we also extend the conjunction operator to positive designs and abstractions as follows . [ conj binary ] 1 . as for positive designs , we set @xmath142 2 . as for abstractions , negative designs of the form @xmath47 , observe that since we are working up to renaming of bound variables , it is no loss of generality to assume that in any pair @xmath47 , @xmath143 , one has @xmath144 for every @xmath145 . we set : @xmath146 observe the following : 1 . the set of positive designs forms a semilattice with respect to @xmath147 and @xmath148 . 2 . @xmath149 for any positive design @xmath1 . the previous definition can be naturally generalized to arbitrary sets as follows : [ conj extension ] 1 . given a set @xmath150 of positive designs , we define the positive design @xmath151 as follows : if @xmath152 , we set @xmath153 . 2 . if @xmath154 , we set @xmath155 . otherwise , @xmath150 is a nonempty set of conjunctions and we set : @xmath156 2 . given a set @xmath150 of abstractions , we define the abstraction @xmath151 as : @xmath157 in particular , if @xmath152 then @xmath158 . notice that @xmath159 , as long as @xmath56 ranges over positive designs or abstractions . a design @xmath56 is said : 1 . * total * , if @xmath160 ; 2 . * closed * , if @xmath56 has no occurrence of free variable ; 3 . * linear * ( or * affine * , more precisely ) , if for any subdesign of the form @xmath161 , the sets @xmath162 , , @xmath163 are pairwise disjoint ; 4 . * deterministic * , if in any occurrence of subdesign @xmath164 , @xmath52 is either empty ( we have @xmath90 ) or a singleton ( we have a predesign ) . * cut - free * , if it does not contain a cut as a subdesign ; 6 . * identity - free * , if it does not contain an identity as subdesign . we remark that the notion of design introduced in @xcite exactly corresponds in our terminology to that of deterministic design . furthermore , considering the specific signature @xmath165 given below , we can also express in our setting girard s original notion of design : let us consider the signature @xmath166 where : 1 . @xmath167 consists of finite subsets of @xmath168 ; 2 . @xmath169 is the function that maps a finite subset @xmath170 to its cardinality @xmath171 . girard s designs correspond to total , linear , deterministic , cut - free and identity - free designs which have a finite number of free variables over the signature @xmath165 . see @xcite for more details . ludics is an interactive theory . this means that designs , which subsume both proofs and models , interact together via normalization , and types ( behaviours ) are defined by the induced orthogonality relation ( section [ s - behaviour ] ) . several ways to normalize designs have been considered in the literature : abstract machines @xcite , abstract merging of orders @xcite , and terms reduction @xcite . here we extend the last solution @xcite . as in untyped @xmath16-calculus , normalization is not necessarily terminating , but in our setting a new difficulty arises through the presence of the operator @xmath21 . we define the normal forms in two steps , first giving a _ nondeterministic _ reduction rule which finds head normal forms whenever possible , and then expanding it corecursively . as usual , let @xmath172 $ ] denote the design obtained by the simultaneous and capture - free substitution of negative designs @xmath173 for @xmath174 in @xmath56 . given positive designs @xmath175 , we write @xmath176 if @xmath177 and @xmath178 $ ] . we denote by @xmath179 the transitive closure , and by @xmath180 the reflexive transitive closure of @xmath181 . given two binary relations @xmath182 on designs , we write @xmath183 to denote the relation given by their composition @xmath184 for instance , we write @xmath185 if there exists @xmath140 such that @xmath186 and @xmath187 . we now give examples of reductions and some remarks . 1 . @xmath188 . @xmath189 ( recall that @xmath190 stands for @xmath191 by our conventions on partial sums ) . 3 . let @xmath192 . we have @xmath193 and @xmath194 . 4 . for @xmath195 , let us consider @xmath196 . we then have an infinite reduction sequence @xmath197 since @xmath198 and the latter design reduces to @xmath199 = n \;|\ ; { { \overline{a}}}\langle n \rangle = p$ ] . let @xmath200 . we have the following reduction : @xmath201 \ = \ b(t).q \;|\ ; { { \overline{b}}}\langle w \rangle \ , \wedge \ , z|\overline{c } \langle m[b(t).q / y ] \rangle.\ ] ] we therefore have @xmath202 and @xmath203 \rangle$ ] . since @xmath204 is a cut , we have : @xmath205 \rangle \ { -\!\!\!\!\!\rightharpoonup}\ q[w / t].\ ] ] 6 . the special designs @xmath90 and @xmath80 do not reduce to anything ( as we will see , they are normal forms ) . 7 . by its definition , our reduction is not closed under context " if @xmath176 and @xmath1 ( resp . @xmath140 ) occurs as a subdesign of @xmath56 ( resp . @xmath55 ) , nothing ensures that @xmath206 . for instance a negative design ( or an head normal form ) having an occurrence of cut as subdesign does not reduces to anything . to expand the reduction under context " we will use definition [ normal form ] . notice that any _ closed _ positive design @xmath1 has one of the following forms : @xmath90 , @xmath80 and @xmath207 , where @xmath89 are cuts . the conjunction then reduces to another closed positive design . hence any sequence of reductions starting from @xmath1 either terminates with @xmath90 or @xmath80 or it diverges . by _ stipulating _ that the normal form of @xmath1 in case of divergence is @xmath80 , we obtain a dichotomy between @xmath90 and @xmath80 : the normal form of a closed positive design is either @xmath90 or @xmath80 . this leads us to the following definition of normal form : [ normal form ] the * normal form function * @xmath208 is defined by corecursion as follows : @xmath209 we observe that when @xmath1 is a closed positive design , we have @xmath210 precisely when _ all _ reduction sequences from @xmath1 are finite and terminate with @xmath90 ; thus our nondeterminism is _ universal _ rather than existential . this , however , does not mean that the set @xmath211 is finite ; even when it is infinite , it may happen that @xmath210 . the following facts are easily observed : [ l - facts ] 1 . if @xmath212 , @xmath213 and @xmath214 , then @xmath215 . 2 . @xmath216 implies @xmath217 . furthermore , if @xmath1 is a predesign , then @xmath176 implies @xmath218 . 3 . @xmath219 , for any set @xmath150 of positive designs . notice that the first statement means that the composed relation @xmath220 is equivalent to @xmath181 as far as total designs are concerned . in @xcite , it is illustrated how words and deterministic finite automata are represented by ( deterministic ) designs in ludics . we may extend the idea to trees and finite tree automata in presence of nondeterminism . rather than describing it in full detail , we will only give an example which illustrates the power of nondeterminism to express ( topdown ) finite tree automata . we consider the set of _ finite trees _ labelled with @xmath221 which are at most binary branching . it is defined by the following grammar : @xmath222 here , @xmath223 represents a tree with the root labelled by @xmath26 and with two subtrees @xmath224 . in particular , @xmath225 represents a leaf labelled by @xmath26 . we simply write @xmath26 in this case . suppose that the signature @xmath226 contains a unary name @xmath227 , binary names @xmath221 and a nullary name @xmath228 . we write @xmath229 for the positive action @xmath230 . we abbreviate @xmath231 by @xmath232 , so that we have @xmath233.\ ] ] each tree is then represented by a deterministic linear negative design as follows : @xmath234 now consider the positive design @xmath235 $ ] defined by the following equations : @xmath236 & : = & x|{\mathord{\downarrow}}\langle a(x , y ) . q_1[x]\wedge q_0[y]\ ; + \ ; b(x , y ) . q_2[x]\wedge q_2[y]\rangle , \\ q_1[x ] & : = & x|{\mathord{\downarrow}}\langle b(x , y ) . q_2[x]\wedge q_2[y]\rangle , \\ q_2[x ] & : = & x|{\mathord{\downarrow}}\langle \epsilon.\maltese\rangle.\end{aligned}\ ] ] this design @xmath140 works as an automata accepting all trees of the form @xmath237 . indeed , given @xmath238 , it works nondeterministically as follows : @xmath239 \\ & \rotatebox[origin = c]{200}{${-\!\!\!\!\!\rightharpoonup}^*\ni$ } & & \rotatebox[origin = c]{340}{${-\!\!\!\!\!\rightharpoonup}^*\ni$ } \\ q_1[b^\star ] & & & & q_0[a(b , b)^\star]\\ \rotatebox[origin = c]{270}{${-\!\!\!\!\!\rightharpoonup}^*\ni$ } & & & \rotatebox[origin = c]{200}{${-\!\!\!\!\!\rightharpoonup}^*\ni$ } & & \rotatebox[origin = c]{340}{${-\!\!\!\!\!\rightharpoonup}^*\ni$ } \\ q_2[\epsilon^\star ] & & \qquad\qquad q_1[b^\star ] & & & & q_0[b^\star ] \\ \rotatebox[origin = c]{270}{${-\!\!\!\!\!\rightharpoonup}^*$ } & & \qquad\qquad \rotatebox[origin = c]{270}{${-\!\!\!\!\!\rightharpoonup}^*\ni$ } & & & & \rotatebox[origin = c]{270}{${-\!\!\!\!\!\rightharpoonup}^*\ni$ } \\ \maltese & & \qquad\qquad q_2[\epsilon^\star ] & & & & q_2[\epsilon^\star ] \\ & & \qquad\qquad \rotatebox[origin = c]{270}{${-\!\!\!\!\!\rightharpoonup}^*$ } & & & & \rotatebox[origin = c]{270}{${-\!\!\!\!\!\rightharpoonup}^*$ } \\ & & \qquad\qquad \maltese & & & & \maltese \end{array}\ ] ] hence we conclude @xmath240 ] \ ! ] } = \maltese$ ] , @xmath140 `` accepts '' the tree @xmath238 . in this subsection , we prove one of the fundamental properties of designs which we will need later : [ t - assoc ] let @xmath56 be a design and @xmath241 be negative designs . we have : @xmath242 { \rrbracket}= { \llbracket } { \llbracket}d { \rrbracket } [ { \llbracket}n_1 { \rrbracket}/y_1 , \ldots , { \llbracket}n_n { \rrbracket}/y_n ] { \rrbracket}.\ ] ] associativity corresponds to a weak form of the church - rosser property : the normal form is the same even if we do not follow the head reduction strategy . in this paper we are not concerned with the full church - rosser property , and leave it as an open question . the proof consists of several stages and it can be skipped at first reading . to prove associativity , first notice that a simultaneous substitution @xmath243 $ ] can be turned into a sequential one of the form @xmath244\cdots[n_n / z_n]$ ] by renaming @xmath245 by fresh variables @xmath246 as follows : @xmath247 = d[z_1/y_1 , \dots , z_n / y_n][n_1/z_1]\cdots[n_n / z_n].\ ] ] moreover , we have : @xmath248\!]}[\ ; { [ \ ! [ n_1 ] \!]}/y_1 , \dots , { [ \ ! [ n_n ] \!]}/y_n ] = { [ \ ! [ \ ; d[z_1/y_1 , \dots , z_n / y_n]\ ; ] \!]}[\ ; { [ \ ! [ n_1 ] \!]}/z_1]\cdots [ \ ; { [ \ ! [ n_n ] \!]}/z_n].\ ] ] this allows us to work with sequential substitutions rather than simultaneous ones . we define a binary relation @xmath249 on designs by : 1 . @xmath250 if @xmath251 \cdots [ n_n / y_n]$ ] and @xmath252\!]}[{[\ ! [ n_1 ] \!]}/y_1]\cdots[{[\ ! [ n_n ] \!]}/y_n]$ ] for some @xmath253 such that @xmath254 for @xmath255 . [ l - a1 ] suppose that @xmath256\cdots[n_n / y_n]$ ] and @xmath257\!]}[{[\ ! [ n_1 ] \!]}/y_1]\cdots[{[\ ! [ n_n ] \!]}/y_n]$ ] so that @xmath258 . when @xmath259 , two cases can be distinguished . 1 . if @xmath260 and @xmath261\cdots[n_n / y_n]$ ] , then there exists @xmath262 such that @xmath263 and @xmath264 . otherwise , there exists @xmath262 such that @xmath265 and @xmath264 . 1 . by lemma [ l - facts ] ( 2 ) , we have @xmath266\!]}\leq{[\ ! [ p_1 ] \!]}$ ] that implies @xmath267\!]}[{[\ ! [ n_1 ] \!]}/y_1]\cdots[{[\ ! [ n_n ] \!]}/y_n]$ ] . hence by letting @xmath268\!]}[{[\ ! [ n_1 ] \!]}/y_1]\cdots[{[\ ! [ n_n ] \!]}/y_n]$ ] , we have @xmath263 and @xmath264 . if ( 1 ) is not the case , a cut must be created by substitution of some @xmath269 for a head variable of @xmath270 . hence @xmath270 must contain a head normal form @xmath271 as conjunct for some @xmath272 and @xmath273 , so that @xmath1 contains a cut @xmath274\cdots[n_n / y_n ] = n_j |{\overline{a}}{\langle \vec{m } \rangle}[n_1/y_1]\cdots[n_n / y_n]\ ] ] ( the equality due to @xmath254 for @xmath275 ) and @xmath276[n_1/y_1]\cdots[n_n / y_n ] $ ] @xmath277 . in this case , @xmath266\!]}$ ] contains @xmath278\ ! ] } \rangle}$ ] so that @xmath140 contains @xmath279\ ! ] } \rangle } [ { [ \ ! [ n_1 ] \!]}/y_1]\cdots[{[\ ! [ n_n ] \!]}/y_n ] = { [ \ ! [ n_j ] \ ! ] } |{\overline{a}}{\langle { [ \ ! [ \vec{m } ] \ ! ] } \rangle } [ { [ \ ! [ n_1 ] \!]}/y_1]\cdots[{[\ ! [ n_n ] \!]}/y_n].\ ] ] since @xmath280\ ! ] } = { \textstyle\sum}a(\vec{x}).{[\ ! [ r_a ] \!]}$ ] , we have @xmath281\!]}[\vec{{[\ ! [ m ] \!]}}/\vec{x } ] [ { [ \ ! [ n_1 ] \!]}/y_1 ] \cdots[{[\ ! [ n_n ] \!]}/y_n]$ ] . let @xmath262 be the latter design . since the simultaneous substitutions @xmath282 $ ] and @xmath283\!]}}/\vec{x}]$ ] can be made sequential , we have @xmath284 . [ l - a2 ] if @xmath258 and @xmath265 , then there exists some @xmath285 such that @xmath284 and @xmath286 . suppose that @xmath256\cdots[n_n / y_n]$ ] , @xmath257\!]}[{[\ ! [ n_1 ] \!]}/y_1]\cdots[{[\ ! [ n_n ] \!]}/y_n]$ ] and @xmath265 . then @xmath266\!]}$ ] must contain @xmath278\ ! ] } \rangle}$ ] for some @xmath287 and @xmath288 . thus , @xmath289 . suppose also @xmath273 so that @xmath280\ ! ] } = { \textstyle\sum}a(\vec{x}).{[\ ! [ r_a ] \!]}$ ] . now the situation is as follows : @xmath140 contains @xmath279\ ! ] } \rangle } [ { [ \ ! [ n_1 ] \!]}/y_1]\cdots[{[\ ! [ n_n ] \!]}/y_n ] = { [ \ ! [ n_j ] \ ! ] } |{\overline{a}}{\langle { [ \ ! [ \vec{m } ] \ ! ] } \rangle } [ { [ \ ! [ n_1 ] \!]}/y_1]\cdots[{[\ ! [ n_n ] \!]}/y_n],\ ] ] so we have @xmath290\!]}[\vec{{[\ ! [ m ] \!]}}/\vec{x } ] [ { [ \ ! [ n_1 ] \!]}/y_1 ] \cdots [ { [ \ ! [ n_n ] \!]}/y_n ] = q'.\ ] ] on the other hand , @xmath291 \cdots [ n_n / y_n ] & \\ & = & n_j |{\overline{a}}{\langle \vec{m } \rangle}[n_1/y_1 ] \cdots [ n_n / y_n ] & \\ & { -\!\!\!\!\!\rightharpoonup } & r_a[\vec{m}/\vec{x}_a ] [ n_1/y_1 ] \cdots [ n_n / y_n ] & = p ' , \end{array}\ ] ] which implies @xmath292 . since the simultaneous substitutions @xmath282 $ ] and @xmath283\!]}}/\vec{x}]$ ] can be made sequential , we have @xmath284 . [ l - a3 ] suppose that @xmath258 . then @xmath293\!]}=\omega$ ] if and only if @xmath294\ ! ] } = \omega$ ] . 1 . for the ` if ' direction , we distinguish two cases . 1 . if there is an infinite reduction sequence from @xmath140 , then there is also an infinite sequence from @xmath1 by lemma [ l - a2 ] . 2 . if @xmath295 , then there is @xmath285 such that @xmath296 and @xmath297 . namely , @xmath285 can be written as @xmath298\cdots[n_n / y_n]$ ] and @xmath299\!]}[{[\ ! [ n_1 ] \!]}/y_1]\cdots[{[\ ! [ n_n ] \!]}/y_n]$ ] . the latter means that @xmath266\ ! ] } = \omega$ ] , which implies @xmath300\ ! ] } = \omega$ ] . from this and @xmath296 , we conclude @xmath293\ ! ] } = \omega$ ] . 2 . for the ` only - if ' direction , if @xmath301 , we easily obtain @xmath294\ ! ] } = \omega$ ] . otherwise , there is an infinite reduction sequence @xmath302 . suppose that @xmath303\cdots[n_n / y_n]$ ] and @xmath304\!]}[{[\ ! [ n_1 ] \!]}/y_1]\cdots[{[\ ! [ n_n ] \!]}/y_n]$ ] . our purpose is to build either a finite reduction sequence @xmath305 or an infinite reduction sequence @xmath306 . two cases arise : 1 . the reductions take place inside @xmath270 and independently of @xmath307 . namely , there is an infinite reduction sequence @xmath308 such that @xmath309\cdots[n_n / y_n]$ ] for every @xmath310 . then @xmath266\!]}= \omega$ ] , which implies @xmath311 . so we have @xmath294\!]}=\omega$ ] . otherwise , there is at most a finite sequence @xmath312 such that @xmath309\cdots[n_n / y_n]$ ] for @xmath313 and @xmath314 contains a head normal form that is responsible for the reduction @xmath315 . by repeatedly applying lemma [ l - a1 ] ( 1 ) , we obtain @xmath262 such that @xmath263 and @xmath316 . since @xmath315 , there exists @xmath317 such that @xmath318 and @xmath319 by lemma [ l - a1 ] ( 2 ) . hence by lemma [ l - facts ] ( 1 ) , we obtain @xmath320 . + in the former case , we are already done . in the latter case , we still have an infinite reduction sequence @xmath321 and @xmath319 . hence we may repeat the same argument to prolong the reduction sequence @xmath322 . hence we eventually obtain @xmath294\!]}=\omega$ ] . [ l - a4 ] suppose that @xmath258 . 1 . if @xmath323 , then there exist @xmath324 such that @xmath325 and @xmath326 , , @xmath327 . conversely , if @xmath328 , then there exist @xmath329 such that @xmath330 and @xmath326 , , @xmath327 . suppose that @xmath331 . by lemmas [ l - a1 ] and [ l - facts ] ( 1 ) ( which states that the composed relation @xmath332 is identical with @xmath181 ) , there is @xmath262 such that @xmath333 and @xmath264 . since @xmath334 , we may write @xmath335\cdots [ n_n / y_n ] = x|{\overline{a}}{\langle \vec{k}[n_1/y_1]\cdots [ n_n / y_n ] \rangle}\ ] ] for some @xmath336 , where @xmath337 , and @xmath262 contains @xmath338\ ! ] } [ { [ \ ! [ n_1 ] \!]}/y_1]\cdots [ { [ \ ! [ n_n ] \!]}/y_n ] = x|{\overline{a}}{\langle \vec{{[\ ! [ k ] \!]}}[{[\ ! [ n_1 ] \!]}/y_1]\cdots [ { [ \ ! [ n_n ] \!]}/y_n ] \rangle}.\ ] ] hence by letting @xmath339\!]}[{[\ ! [ n_1 ] \!]}/y_1]\cdots [ { [ \ ! [ n_n ] \!]}/y_n]$ ] we obtain @xmath340 for every @xmath341 . since @xmath342 , namely @xmath343 , the claim holds . conversely , suppose that @xmath344 . by lemma [ l - a2 ] , there is @xmath285 such that @xmath345 and @xmath264 . the rest is similar to the above . [ l - a5 ] if @xmath346 , then either @xmath347 for a variable @xmath348 , or @xmath349 , @xmath350 and @xmath351 for every @xmath32 . immediate . the following lemma completes the proof of theorem [ t - assoc ] . if @xmath352 , then @xmath353\ ! ] } = { [ \ ! [ e_0 ] \!]}$ ] . define a binary relation @xmath125 on designs as follows : 1 . for positive ( resp . negative ) designs @xmath354 , we have @xmath128 if @xmath355\!]}$ ] , @xmath356\!]}$ ] , and @xmath357 for some @xmath358 and @xmath359 . 2 . for predesigns @xmath360 , we have @xmath361 if @xmath362\ ! ] } , \dots , { [ \ ! [ m_m ] \ ! ] } \rangle}$ ] , @xmath363\ ! ] } , \dots , $ $ { [ \ ! [ l_m ] \ ! ] } \rangle}$ ] , and @xmath340 for every @xmath364 . we now verify that this @xmath125 satisfies the conditions of lemma [ l - equiv ] . first , let @xmath175 be positive designs such that @xmath365 , @xmath366\!]}$ ] , @xmath367\!]}$ ] , and @xmath368 for some @xmath270 and @xmath369 . 1 . if @xmath266\!]}=\omega$ ] , then @xmath370\!]}= \omega$ ] too by lemma [ l - a3 ] . hence ( 1 ) holds . 2 . if @xmath266\!]}$ ] is a conjunction , then @xmath370\!]}$ ] is not @xmath80 by lemma [ l - a3 ] , so is a conjunction . if @xmath266\!]}$ ] contains @xmath371\ ! ] } , \dots , { [ \ ! [ m_m ] \ ! ] } \rangle}$ ] , then @xmath372 . since @xmath368 , lemma [ l - a4 ] yields @xmath373 for some @xmath374 . namely , @xmath370\!]}$ ] contains @xmath375\ ! ] } \rangle}$ ] . moreover , we have @xmath340 for every @xmath364 . similarly , one can show that if @xmath370\!]}$ ] contains @xmath375\ ! ] } \rangle}$ ] , then @xmath266\!]}$ ] contains @xmath376\ ! ] } \rangle}$ ] and @xmath340 for every @xmath364 . hence ( 2 ) holds . let @xmath360 be predesigns such that @xmath377 , i.e. , @xmath362\ ! ] } , \dots , { [ \ ! [ m_m ] \ ! ] } \rangle}$ ] , @xmath363\ ! ] } , \dots , $ $ { [ \ ! [ l_m ] \ ! ] } \rangle}$ ] , and @xmath340 for every @xmath364 . it immediately follows that @xmath378\ ! ] } { \ ; \cr\ ; } { [ \ ! [ l_i ] \!]}$ ] for every @xmath364 . also , @xmath379 . hence ( 3 ) holds . finally , let @xmath380 be negative designs such that @xmath381\!]}$ ] , @xmath382\!]}$ ] , and @xmath383 for some @xmath384 and @xmath385 . 1 . if @xmath386 , then @xmath387 . hence ( 4 ) holds . 2 . otherwise , @xmath79 must be of the form @xmath388\!]}$ ] and @xmath389 . since @xmath383 , @xmath385 is of the form @xmath390 and @xmath391 for every @xmath32 by lemma [ l - a5 ] . so @xmath392\ ! ] } = { \textstyle\sum}a(\vec{x}_a).{[\ ! [ q_a ] \!]}$ ] and @xmath393\ ! ] } { \ ; \cr\ ; } { [ \ ! [ q_a ] \!]}$ ] . hence ( 5 ) holds . therefore , if @xmath357 , we have @xmath353\ ! ] } = { [ \ ! [ e_0 ] \!]}$ ] by lemma [ l - equiv ] . this section is concerned with the type structure of ludics . we describe orthogonality and behaviours in [ ortho - s ] , logical connectives in [ ss - logical ] and finally explain ( the failure of ) internal completeness of logical connectives in [ ss - internal ] . in the rest of this paper , we mainly restrict ourselves to a special subclass of designs : we only consider designs which are _ total _ , _ cut - free _ , and _ identity - free_. generalizing the terminology in @xcite , we call them _ standard designs_. in other words : [ d - standard ] a design @xmath56 is said * standard * if it satisfies the following two conditions : a. _ cut - freeness and identity - freeness _ : @xmath56 can be coinductively generated by the following restricted version of the grammar given in definition [ designs ] : @xmath394 b. _ totality _ : @xmath160 . the totality condition is due to the original work @xcite . it has a pleasant consequence that behaviours ( see below ) are never empty . we also remark that the lack of identities can be somehow compensated by considering their infinitary @xmath395 expansions , called _ faxes _ in @xcite . in our setting , the infinitary @xmath395 expansion of an identity @xmath75 is expressed by the negative standard design @xmath396 defined by the equation : @xmath397 we refer to @xcite for more details . we are now ready to define orthogonality and behaviours . a positive design @xmath1 is said * atomic * if it is standard and @xmath398 for a certain fixed variable @xmath399 . here plays the same role as the empty address @xmath400 " does in @xcite : @xmath399 may be thought of as a fixed and predetermined location . " ] a negative design @xmath79 is said * atomic * if it is standard and @xmath401 . two atomic designs @xmath402 of opposite polarities are said * orthogonal * and written @xmath403 ( or equivalently @xmath404 ) when @xmath405 { \rrbracket}= \maltese$ ] . if @xmath150 is a set of atomic designs of the same polarity , then its * orthogonal set * , denoted by @xmath406 , is defined by @xmath407 . the meaning of @xmath21 and the associated partial order @xmath147 can be clarified in terms of orthogonality . for atomic designs @xmath354 of the same polarity , define @xmath408 if and only if @xmath409 . @xmath408 means that @xmath55 has more chances of convergence than @xmath56 when interacting with other atomic designs . the following is easy to observe . [ conj and ort ] 1 . @xmath410 is a preorder . @xmath138 implies @xmath411 for any pair of atomic positive designs @xmath175 . 3 . let @xmath150 and @xmath412 be sets of atomic designs of the same polarity . then @xmath413 implies @xmath414 . in particular , @xmath415 for any atomic positive design @xmath1 . , which does not officially belong to the universe of atomic designs . ] this justifies our identification of @xmath90 with the empty conjunction @xmath416 . [ r - separation ] designs in @xcite satisfy the _ separation property _ : for any designs @xmath354 of the same polarity , we have @xmath417 if and only if @xmath418 . but when the constraint of linearity is removed , this property no more holds , as observed in @xcite ( see also @xcite ) . in our setting , separation does not hold , even when @xmath56 and @xmath55 are deterministic ( atomic ) designs . for instance , consider the following two designs @xcite : @xmath419 it is easy to see that in our setting @xmath403 holds if and only if @xmath79 has an additive component of the form @xmath420 for arbitrary index set @xmath52 and arbitrary standard negative designs @xmath421 with @xmath422 . the same holds for @xmath140 , as can be observed from the following reduction sequence ( for readability , we only consider the case in which @xmath79 has a component of the form @xmath423 , the general case easily follows ) : @xmath424 & = & n \;|\ ; { \mathord{\downarrow}}\langle{\mathord{\uparrow}}(y ) . p [ n / x_0]\rangle \\ & { -\!\!\!\!\!\rightharpoonup } & \left ( { \mathord{\uparrow}}(y ) . p [ n / x_0]\right ) \;|\ ; { \mathord{\downarrow}}\langle m[{\mathord{\uparrow}}(y ) . p [ n / x_0]/z]\rangle \\ & { -\!\!\!\!\!\rightharpoonup } & p[n / x_0]\ { -\!\!\!\!\!\rightharpoonup}^\ast \ \maltese.\end{aligned}\ ] ] ( if @xmath79 does not have a component of the form discussed above , we have @xmath425 { -\!\!\!\!\!\rightharpoonup}^ * \omega$ ] . ) we therefore conclude @xmath426 , even though @xmath427 . although possible , we do not define orthogonality for nonatomic designs . accordingly , we only consider _ atomic _ behaviours which consist of atomic designs . [ d - beh ] a * behaviour * @xmath150 is a set of atomic standard designs of the same polarity such that @xmath428 . a behaviour is positive or negative according to the polarity of its designs . we denote positive behaviours by @xmath429 and negative behaviours by @xmath430 . orthogonality satisfies the following standard properties : [ closure operator ] let @xmath431 be sets of atomic designs of the same polarity . we have : 1 . @xmath432 . 2 . @xmath433 . 3 . @xmath434 . 4 . @xmath435 . in particular , any orthogonal set is a behaviour . 5 . @xmath436 . in particular , the intersection of two behaviours is a behaviour . we also observe that @xmath437 and @xmath438 implies @xmath439 when @xmath150 is a behaviour . among all positive ( resp . negative ) behaviours , there exist the least and the greatest behaviours with respect to set inclusion:@xmath440 where @xmath441 plays the role of the design called _ negative daimon _ in @xcite . notice that behaviours are always nonempty due to the totality condition : any positive ( resp . negative ) behaviour contains @xmath90 ( resp . @xmath442 ) . now that we have given behaviours , we can define _ contexts of behaviours _ and then the _ semantical entailment _ @xmath443 in order to relate designs to contexts of behaviours . these constructs play the role of typing environments in type systems . they correspond to _ sequents of behaviours _ , in the terminology of @xcite . a. a * positive context * @xmath444 is of the form @xmath445 , where @xmath34 are distinct variables and @xmath446 are ( atomic ) positive behaviours . we denote by @xmath447 the set @xmath448 . + a * negative context * @xmath449 is a positive context @xmath444 enriched with an ( atomic ) negative behaviour @xmath450 , to which no variable is associated . b. the * semantical entailment * is the binary relation @xmath443 between designs and contexts of behaviours of the same polarity defined as follows : + @xmath451 if and only if : 1 . @xmath1 is standard ; 2 . @xmath452 ; 3 . @xmath453 { \rrbracket}= \maltese$ ] for any @xmath454 , , @xmath455 . + @xmath456 if and only if : 1 . @xmath79 is standard ; 2 . @xmath457 ; 3 . @xmath458/x_0 ] { \rrbracket}= \maltese$ ] for any @xmath454 , , @xmath455 , @xmath459 . clearly , @xmath460 if and only if @xmath461 , and @xmath462 if and only if @xmath463\in \bp$ ] . furthermore , associativity ( theorem [ t - assoc ] ) implies the following quite useful principle : [ l - closure ] 1 . @xmath464 if and only if @xmath465 { \rrbracket}\models \bgamma$ ] for any @xmath466 ; 2 . @xmath467 if and only if @xmath468 { \rrbracket}\models \bgamma$ ] for any @xmath469 ; 3 . @xmath470 if and only if @xmath471 { \rrbracket}\models \bgamma,\bn$ ] for any @xmath466 . 1 . let @xmath1 be a standard design with @xmath472 and @xmath444 a context @xmath473 . first , we claim that @xmath465 { \rrbracket}$ ] is a standard design when @xmath464 and @xmath466 . indeed , it is obviously cut - free . it is also identity - free because so are @xmath474 and neither substitution @xmath475 $ ] nor normalization @xmath465 { \rrbracket}$ ] introduces identities . totality will be shown below . we also note that @xmath476 { \rrbracket } ) \subseteq \{x_1 , \dots , x_n\}$ ] , since @xmath2 is an atomic negative design that is always closed . + next , we observe that @xmath477 { \rrbracket}= { \llbracket}\ ; { \llbracket}p[m / z ] { \rrbracket}\ ; [ \vec{k}/\vx ] { \rrbracket}$ ] for any list @xmath478 of standard negative designs . indeed , notice that @xmath479 = p[m / z ] [ \vec{k}/\vx]$ ] since @xmath2 is closed , and @xmath480\ ! ] } = k_i$ ] since @xmath481 is cut - free . hence by associativity , we obtain : @xmath482 { \rrbracket}= { \llbracket}p[m / z ] [ \vec{k}/\vx ] { \rrbracket}= { \llbracket}\ ; { \llbracket}p[m / z ] { \rrbracket}\ ; [ { \llbracket}\vec{k } { \rrbracket}/\vx ] { \rrbracket}= { \llbracket}\ ; { \llbracket}p[m / z ] { \rrbracket}\ ; [ \vec{k } /\vx ] { \rrbracket}. \ ] ] in particular , @xmath477 { \rrbracket}= \maltese$ ] implies the totality of @xmath465 { \rrbracket}$ ] . + we are now ready to prove the first claim . writing @xmath483 for @xmath484 , , @xmath485 , we have : @xmath486 { \rrbracket}= \maltese \mbox { for every $ \vec{k}\in \bgamma{{}^{\bot}}$ and $ m\in \bp^\bot$ } , \\ & \longleftrightarrow & { \llbracket}\ ; { \llbracket}p[m / z ] { \rrbracket}\ ; [ \vec{k } /\vx ] { \rrbracket}= \maltese \mbox { for every $ \vec{k}\in \bgamma{{}^{\bot}}$ and $ m\in \bp^\bot$ } , \\ & \longleftrightarrow & { \llbracket}p[m / z ] { \rrbracket}\models \bgamma \mbox { for every $ m\in \bp^\bot$.}\end{aligned}\ ] ] 2 . and ( 3 ) are proven in a similar way . we just mention that the crucial equalities @xmath487/x_0 ] { \rrbracket } & = & { \llbracket}\ ; { \llbracket}q[n / x_0 ] { \rrbracket}\ ; [ \vec { k } /\vx ] { \rrbracket},\\ { \llbracket}q[n[\vec{k}/\vx , m / z]/x_0 ] { \rrbracket } & = & { \llbracket}q [ \ ; { \llbracket}n[m / z ] { \rrbracket}\ ; [ \vec{k}/\vx]/x_0 ] { \rrbracket},\end{aligned}\ ] ] which are needed to show ( 2 ) and ( 3 ) respectively , can be straightforwardly derived from associativity . we next describe how to build behaviours by means of _ logical connectives _ in ludics . [ d - lc ] an * @xmath40-ary logical connective * @xmath95 is a pair @xmath488 where : 1 . @xmath489 is a sequence of distinct variables ; 2 . @xmath490 is a finite set of negative actions such that : 1 . the names @xmath491 are distinct ; 2 . @xmath492 for each @xmath493 . two logical connectives are identified if one is obtained from another by renaming of variables . we can intuitively explain the structure of logical connectives in terms of standard connectives of linear logic as follows . the variables @xmath494 play the role of _ placeholders _ for ( immediate ) subformulas , while @xmath495 determines the _ logical structure _ of @xmath95 . an action @xmath496 can be seen as a kind of @xmath497-ary tensor product " @xmath498 indexed by the name @xmath26 . the whole set @xmath495 can be thought of as @xmath499-ary additive sum " of its elements : @xmath500 in appendix [ pol ll ] we give a more precise correspondence between logical connective in our sense and connectives of polarized linear logic @xcite . [ example ] consider the logical connective @xmath501 . by the previous discussion , we can intuitively think of it as @xmath502 when @xmath95 is applied to @xmath503 , it gives the formula @xmath504 we now define behaviours built by logical connectives . [ d - log conn beh ] given an @xmath497-ary name @xmath26 , an @xmath40-ary logical connective @xmath505 with @xmath506 and behaviours @xmath507 we define : 1 . @xmath508 2 . @xmath509 3 . @xmath510 where the indices @xmath511 vary for each @xmath512 and are determined by the variables @xmath513 . we call the set @xmath514 the _ ethics _ of @xmath515 . [ ethics ] an ethics is a set of atomic predesigns which are by construction linear in @xmath399 . it can be seen as a generator " of a behaviour defined by logical connectives in the following sense . for positives , we have by definition @xmath516 . for negatives , we have by proposition [ closure operator ] ( 3 ) : @xmath517 let @xmath95 be the logical connective as given in example [ example ] and @xmath518 negative behaviours . we have @xmath519 . [ linear ] logical connectives @xmath520{180}{\&}\ , } , \with , { \mathord{\uparrow}},\bot , \top$ ] can be defined if the signature @xmath226 contains a nullary name @xmath521 , unary names @xmath522 and a binary name @xmath523 . we also give notations to their duals for readability . @xmath524 where @xmath228 denotes the empty sequence . we do not have exponentials here , because we are working in a nonlinear setting so that they are already incorporated into the connectives . with these logical connectives we can build behaviours corresponding to usual linear logic types ( we use infix notations such as @xmath525 rather than the prefix ones @xmath526 ) . @xmath527 the next theorem illustrates a special feature of behaviours defined by logical connectives . it also suggests that nonlinearity and universal nondeterminism play dual roles . [ p - duphalf ] [ fundi ] [ p - log ] let @xmath528 be an arbitrary positive behaviour . 1 . @xmath529 \in \bp$ ] . 2 . @xmath530 . moreover , if @xmath528 is _ obtained by applying a logical connective _ , that is @xmath531 for some @xmath95 , @xmath532 , then : 1 . the converse of _ ( 1 ) _ ( _ duplicability _ ) and 2 . the converse of _ ( 2 ) _ ( _ closure under @xmath21 _ ) hold . 1 . for any @xmath533 , we have @xmath534 { \rrbracket}=\maltese$ ] . hence , @xmath535[n / x_0 ] { \rrbracket}= \maltese$ ] , and so @xmath536 \in \bp^{\bot\bot } = \bp$ ] . 2 . by proposition [ conj and ort ] ( 3 ) , we have @xmath537 for any @xmath538 . since @xmath539 is a behaviour , it is upward closed with respect to @xmath410 . hence the claim holds . 3 . for the sake of readability , we consider the binary case and show that @xmath540 implies @xmath541 . the general case can be proven using the same argument . + let @xmath542 . to prove @xmath543 , by remark [ ethics ] , it is sufficient to show that @xmath544 is orthogonal to any @xmath545 . since by construction @xmath399 occurs only once at the head position of @xmath546 , we only have to show that @xmath547 . + let @xmath548 and @xmath549 so that @xmath550 . since @xmath551 is a predesign , we have by lemma [ l - facts ] ( 2 ) , ( 3 ) : @xmath552 { \rrbracket}= { \llbracket}p_a[\vec{k}/\vx ] { \rrbracket}\wedge { \llbracket}q_a[\vec{k}/\vx ] { \rrbracket}= { \llbracket}n \;|\ ; { { \overline{a}}}\langle \vec{k } \rangle { \rrbracket}\wedge { \llbracket}m \;|\ ; { { \overline{a}}}\langle \vec{k } \rangle { \rrbracket}.\ ] ] since @xmath553 , we have @xmath554 and @xmath555 . our claim then immediately follows . 4 . let @xmath556\in \bp = \coal\langle \bn_1,\ldots,\bn_n \rangle$ ] . it suffices to show that @xmath557 { \rrbracket}=\maltese$ ] holds for any @xmath558 . but we have just proven that @xmath559 , and so @xmath560[n\wedge m / x_0 ] { \rrbracket}= { \llbracket}p[n\wedge m / x_1 , n\wedge m / x_2 ] { \rrbracket}= \maltese$ ] . since @xmath561 by proposition [ conj and ort ] ( 3 ) , we have @xmath562 { \rrbracket}= \maltese$ ] . theorem [ p - log ] can be considered as an internal , monistic form of soundness and completeness for the contraction rule : soundness corresponds to point ( 1 ) while completeness to its converse ( 3 ) , duplicability . however , in the sequel we only use point ( 1 ) ( in theorem [ soundness ] ) and point ( 4 ) ( in lemma [ l - comp ] ) of theorem [ p - log ] . in @xcite , girard proposes a purely monistic , local notion of completeness , called _ internal completeness_. it means that we can give a precise and direct description to the elements of behaviours ( built by logical connectives ) without using the orthogonality and without referring to any proof system . it is easy to see that negative logical connectives enjoy internal completeness : [ t - negative ] let @xmath563 be a logical connective with @xmath564 and @xmath565 an atomic negative design . we have : @xmath566 where the indices @xmath567 are determined by the variables @xmath568 . let @xmath548 be an atomic negative design and @xmath569 . since @xmath570 $ ] is a predesign and @xmath399 occurs only at the head position of @xmath1 , we have by lemma [ l - facts ] ( 2 ) : @xmath571 { \rrbracket}= { \llbracket}{\textstyle\sum}a(\vx).p_a \;|\ ; { { \overline{a}}}\langle n_1,\ldots , n_m \rangle { \rrbracket}= { \llbracket}p_a[n_1/z_{i_1},\ldots , n_m / z_{i_m } ] { \rrbracket}.\ ] ] this means that @xmath572 ( see remark [ ethics ] ) if and only if for every @xmath573 and for every @xmath574 , @xmath575 { \rrbracket}=\maltese $ ] if and only if for every @xmath573 , @xmath576 ( see definition [ d - context ] ( b ) ) . notice that in the above , @xmath577 can be arbitrary when @xmath578 . thus our approach is `` immaterial '' in that we do not consider material designs ( see @xcite for the definition of material design ) . the original `` material '' version of internal completeness @xcite can be easily derived from our immaterial one . a remarkable example of internal completeness for negative behaviours is provided for the logical connective @xmath579 : @xmath580 above , the irrelevant components of the sum are suppressed by `` @xmath581 . '' up to materiality ( removal of irrelevant additive components ) , @xmath582 , which has been defined by _ intersection _ , is isomorphic to the _ cartesian product _ of @xmath528 and @xmath583 . this isomorphism is called _ the mystery of incarnation _ " in @xcite . as to positive connectives , @xcite proves internal completeness theorems for additive and multiplicative ones separately in the linear and deterministic setting . they are integrated in @xcite as follows : when the universe of standard designs is restricted to linear and deterministic ones , we have @xmath584 however , this is no more true with nonlinear designs . a counterexample is given below . [ example completeness ] let us consider the behaviour @xmath585 and the designs @xmath586 and @xmath587 of remark [ r - separation ] . by construction , @xmath1 belongs to @xmath528 . since @xmath588 , @xmath140 also belongs to @xmath528 . however , @xmath589 , since @xmath590 is not atomic and so can not belong to @xmath591 . this motivates us to directly prove completeness for proofs , rather than deriving it from internal completeness as in the original work @xcite . in @xcite a weaker form of internal completeness is proved , which is enough to derive a weaker form of full completeness : all _ finite _ `` winning '' designs are interpretations of proofs . while such a finiteness assumption is quite common in game semantics , we will show that it can be avoided in ludics . we end this section with the following remark . the main linear logic isomorphism , namely the exponential one @xmath592 can be expressed in our notation as @xmath593 . in our setting it is possible to prove that those behaviours are morally " isomorphic , in the sense that they are isomorphic if we consider designs equal up to materiality and @xmath55 are equal up to materiality in a behaviour @xmath594 if they only differ in occurrences of positive subdesign which are irrelevant for the normalization against designs of @xmath595 . ] . we can in fact define a pair of maps @xmath596 on designs such that : 1 . @xmath597 and @xmath598 ; 2 . if @xmath1 and @xmath140 are equal up to materiality in @xmath599 , then @xmath600 and @xmath601 are equal up to materiality in @xmath602 , and similarly for @xmath603 ; 3 . for any @xmath604 , we have that @xmath605 and @xmath1 are equal up to materiality in @xmath599 , and similarly for the other direction . we postpone a detailed study of isomorphisms of types and related issues to a subsequent work . having set up the framework , we now address the main problem : an interactive form of gdel completeness . we first introduce the proof system in [ proof system ] , then examine its soundness in [ ss - soundness ] , and finally prove completeness in [ completeness ] , in a way quite analogous to the proof of gdel s theorem based on proof search ( often attributed to schtte @xcite ) . we will now introduce a proof system . in our system , logical rules are automatically generated by logical connectives . since the names which constitute the logical connectives are chosen among the names of a signature @xmath30 , the set of logical connectives vary for each signature @xmath226 . thus , our proof system is parameterized by @xmath226 . if one chooses @xmath226 rich enough , the constant - only fragment of polarized linear logic ( @xcite ; see also @xcite ) can be embedded , as we will show in appendix [ pol ll ] . in the sequel , we focus on _ logical _ behaviours , which are composed by using logical connectives only . [ logical behaviours ] a behaviour is * logical * if it is inductively built as follows ( @xmath95 denotes an arbitrary logical connective ) : @xmath606 notice that the orthogonal of a logical behaviour is again logical . as advocated in the introduction , our monistic framework renders both proofs and models as homogeneous objects : designs . [ proof , models ] a * proof * is a standard design ( definition [ d - standard ] ) in which all the conjunctions are unary . in other words , a proof is a total , deterministic and @xmath90-free design without cuts and identities . a * model * is a linear standard design ( in which conjunctions of arbitrary cardinality may occur ) . we will use proofs as proof - terms for syntactic derivations in the proof system to be introduced below . in that perspective , it is reasonable to exclude designs with non - unary conjunctions from proofs , because they do not have natural counterparts in logical reasoning . for instance , the nullary conjunction ( daimon ) and the binary one would correspond to the following `` inference rules '' respectively : @xmath607 with @xmath608 an arbitrary sequent . notice that we have not specified yet what a proof actually proves . hence it might be better called `` proof attempt '' or `` untyped proof '' or `` para - proof . '' on the other hand , we restrict models to linear designs just to emphasize the remarkable fact that _ linear _ designs do suffice for defeating any failed proof attempt that is possibly _ nonlinear_. given a design @xmath56 , let @xmath609 be the set of occurrences of positive actions @xmath31 in @xmath56 . the _ cardinality _ of @xmath56 is defined to be the cardinality of @xmath609 . for instance , the fax @xmath610 ( see section [ ortho - s ] ) is an infinite design in this sense . also , both proofs and models can be infinite . a _ positive _ ( resp . _ negative _ ) _ sequent _ is a pair of the form @xmath611 ( resp . @xmath612 ) where @xmath1 is a positive proof ( resp . @xmath79 is a negative proof ) and @xmath444 is a positive context of logical behaviours ( definition [ d - context ] ( a ) ) such that @xmath613 ( resp . @xmath614 ) . we write @xmath615 for a generic sequent . intuitively , a sequent @xmath615 should be understood as a claim that `` @xmath56 is a proof of @xmath616 '' or `` @xmath56 is of type @xmath616 . '' our proof system consists of two sorts of inference rules : 1 . a _ positive _ rule @xmath617 : + @xmath618{z|\coa\langle m_1 , \dots , m_m \rangle\vdash \bgamma } { m_1 \vdash \bgamma , \bn_{i_1 } & \dots & m_m \vdash \bgamma , \bn_{i_m } & ( z:\coal\langle\bn_1 , \dots , \bn_n\rangle \in \bgamma)}\ ] ] where @xmath488 , @xmath489 and @xmath619 so that the indices @xmath620 are determined by the variables @xmath621 . 2 . a _ negative _ rule @xmath622 : @xmath623{{\textstyle\sum}a(\vx).p_a \vdash \bgamma , \alpha(\bp_1 , \dots , \bp_n ) } { \{p_a \vdash \bgamma , z_{i_1 } : \bp_{i_1 } , \dots , z_{i_m } : \bp_{i_m}\}_{a(\vx)\in \alpha_0 } } \ ] ] where , as in the positive rule , the indices @xmath624 are determined by the variables @xmath621 for each @xmath512 . + we assume that @xmath37 are fresh , do not occur in @xmath444 . this does not cause a loss of generality since variables in @xmath95 can be renamed ( see definition [ d - lc ] ) . + notice that a component @xmath70 of @xmath47 can be arbitrary when @xmath625 . hence we again take an `` immaterial '' approach ( theorem [ t - negative ] ) . observe that the positive rule @xmath617 involves implicit uses of the contraction rule on positive behaviours . the weakening rule for positive behaviours is implicit too ; in the bottom up reading of a proof derivation , unused formulas are always propagated to the premises of any instance of rule . it should also be noted that proof search in our system is deterministic . in particular , given a positive sequent @xmath626 , the head variable @xmath627 and the first positive action @xmath31 completely determine the next positive rule to be applied bottom - up ( if there is any ) . it is also possible to adopt a `` material '' approach in the proof system by simply requiring @xmath628 when @xmath625 in the rule @xmath622 . then a proof @xmath56 is finite ( @xmath609 is a finite set ) whenever @xmath629 is derivable for some @xmath630 . thus , as in ordinary sequent calculi , our proof system accepts only _ essentially finite _ proofs for derivable sequents ( finite up to removal of irrelevant parts ) . [ example top fax ] to clarify the last point , we observe that for any ( _ possibly infinite _ ) negative proof @xmath79 with @xmath631 , the sequent @xmath632 is derivable by the instance of the negative rule with @xmath633 . in fact , this corresponds to the usual top - rule of linear logic ( see also example [ linear rules ] ) : this means that for a ( possibly infinite ) negative proof @xmath79 there is a finite derivation of @xmath632 . by contrast , in the `` material '' approach we only have where @xmath634 is the unique negative proof which has cardinality @xmath635 . [ linear rules ] for linear logic connectives ( example [ linear ] ) , the positive and negative rules specialize to the following ( taking here the `` material '' approach ) : @xmath636{z|\bullet\langle m_1 , m_2\rangle \vdash \bgamma } { m_1 \vdash \bgamma , \bn_1 & m_2 \vdash \bgamma , \bn_2 & ( z:\bn_1 \pmb{\otimes } \bn_2 \in \bgamma ) } \quad \infer[\pmb{{\,\rotatebox[origin = c]{180}{\&}\,}}]{\wp(x_1 , x_2 ) . p \vdash \bgamma , \bp_1 \pmb{{\,\rotatebox[origin = c]{180}{\&}\ , } } \bp_2}{p \vdash \bgamma , x_1 : \bp_1 , x_2 : \bp_2}\\[1em ] \infer[(\pmb{\llplus } , \iota_i)]{z|\iota_i\langle m\rangle \vdash \bgamma } { m \vdash \bgamma , \bn_i & ( z:\bn_1 \pmb{\llplus } \bn_2 \in \bgamma ) } \qquad \infer[\pmb{\llwith}]{\pi_1(x_1 ) . p_1 + \pi_2(x_2 ) . p_2 \vdash \bgamma , \bp_1 \pmb{\llwith } \bp_2}{p_1 \vdash \bgamma , x_1 : \bp_1 & p_2 \vdash \bgamma , x_2 : \bp_2}\\[1em ] \infer[({\pmb{\mathord{\downarrow } } } , { \mathord{\downarrow}})]{z|{\mathord{\downarrow}}\langle n\rangle \vdash { { \mathbf{\gamma } } } } { n \vdash \bgamma , { { \mathbf{n } } } & ( z : { \pmb{\mathord{\downarrow}}}{{\mathbf{n}}}\in \bgamma ) } \qquad \infer[{\pmb{\mathord{\uparrow}}}]{{\mathord{\uparrow}}(x).p \vdash \bgamma , { \pmb{\mathord{\uparrow}}}\bp}{p \vdash \bgamma , x : \bp}\\[1em ] \infer[(\llone,\overline{*})]{z|\overline{*}\vdash\bgamma } { ( z:\llone \in \bgamma ) } \qquad \infer[({\pmb{\bot}})]{*.p\vdash\bgamma,{\pmb{\bot}}}{p\vdash\bgamma } \qquad \infer[({\pmb{\top}})]{{\textstyle\sum}a(\vx).\omega \vdash\bgamma,{\pmb{\top } } } { } \end{array}\ ] ] the inference rules given above are all sound . namely we have : [ soundness ] if @xmath615 is derivable in the proof system , then @xmath637 . by induction on the length of the derivation of @xmath615 . we have two cases , one for each sort of rule . 1 . suppose that the last inference rule is + @xmath618{z|\coa\langle m_1 , \dots , m_m \rangle\vdash \bgamma } { m_1 \vdash \bgamma , \bn_{i_1 } & \dots & m_m \vdash \bgamma , \bn_{i_m } & ( z:\coal\langle\bn_1 , \dots , \bn_n\rangle \in \bgamma)}\ ] ] where @xmath638 and @xmath639 for some @xmath640 . + the induction hypothesis gives us @xmath641 for every @xmath642 . by lemma [ l - closure ] ( 3 ) , @xmath643 { \rrbracket}\in \bn_{i_j}$ ] for every @xmath644 and by definition [ d - lc ] , we have that @xmath645 , that is @xmath646 . + applying lemma [ l - closure ] ( 1 ) , we get @xmath647 and by theorem [ p - duphalf ] ( 1 ) we conclude @xmath648 . 2 . suppose now that the last inference rule is + @xmath623{{\textstyle\sum}a(\vx).p_a \vdash \bgamma , \alpha(\bp_1 , \dots , \bp_n ) } { \{p_a \vdash \bgamma , \vx : \vec{\bp}_a\}_{a(\vx)\in \alpha_0 } } \ ] ] where @xmath649 and @xmath650 stands for @xmath651 . we assume that the variables @xmath652 and @xmath37 are disjoint in any premise . + the induction hypothesis gives us @xmath653 for every @xmath654 . by lemma [ l - closure ] ( 1 ) , for every @xmath655 , @xmath656 { \rrbracket}\models \vx : \vec{\bp}_a$ ] . + then , we can apply theorem [ t - negative ] to obtain @xmath657 , that is @xmath658 . notice that in @xmath659 the components @xmath70 for @xmath660 can be arbitrary . + we finally apply lemma [ l - closure ] ( 3 ) and conclude @xmath661 . although our proof system does not include a cut rule officially , the semantics validates it as follows . 1 . if @xmath662 and @xmath663 , then @xmath465 { \rrbracket}\models \bgamma$ ] . 2 . if @xmath664 and @xmath663 , then @xmath471 { \rrbracket}\models \bn,\bgamma$ ] . let @xmath444 be @xmath473 , let @xmath665 and write @xmath666 for @xmath667 . 1 . by lemma [ l - closure ] , we have @xmath668 { \rrbracket}\models z : \bp$ ] and @xmath669 { \rrbracket}\models \bp{{}^{\bot}}$ ] , so that @xmath670 \in \bp$ ] and and @xmath671 . hence , @xmath672[m'/x_0 ] { \rrbracket}= { \llbracket}p'[m'/z ] { \rrbracket}= \maltese$ ] . from this fact and associativity ( theorem [ t - assoc ] ) , we can derive @xmath673 { \rrbracket}[\vec { k } /\vx ] { \rrbracket}=\maltese$ ] , which proves @xmath465 { \rrbracket}\models \bgamma$ ] . 2 . let @xmath140 be an arbitrary design in @xmath674 . by lemma [ l - closure ] , we obtain @xmath468 { \rrbracket}\models \bgamma , z : \bp$ ] and @xmath675 { \rrbracket}[\vec{k}/\vx ] { \rrbracket}\models z : \bp$ ] . on the other side , we have @xmath669 { \rrbracket}\models \bp{{}^{\bot}}$ ] . from @xmath676 \in \bp$ ] and and @xmath671 , we obtain @xmath677[m'/x_0 ] { \rrbracket}= { \llbracket}q'[m'/z ] { \rrbracket}= \maltese$ ] . from this fact and associativity , we can derive @xmath678 { \rrbracket}[\vec { k } /\vx ] \ ; /x_0 ] { \rrbracket}=\maltese$ ] , which proves @xmath471 { \rrbracket}\models \bn,\bgamma$ ] . thanks to the previous proposition , we can naturally strengthen our proof system as follows . first , we consider sequents of the form @xmath615 where @xmath56 is a proof with cuts " ( a proof in the sense of definition [ proof , models ] except that the cut - freeness condition is not imposed ) . second , we add the following cut rule : @xmath679{d[n / z]\vdash \mathbf{\xi},\bgamma } { d \vdash \mathbf{\xi } , \bgamma , z:\bp & n \vdash \bgamma , \bp^\bot}\ ] ] where @xmath680 is either empty or it consists of a negative logical behaviour @xmath450 . the soundness theorem can be naturally generalized as follows : if @xmath615 is derivable in the proof system with the cut rule above , then @xmath681 . let us finally establish the other direction of theorem [ soundness ] , namely : [ full completeness ] a sequent @xmath682 is derivable in the proof system if and only if @xmath683 . in particular , for any positive logical behaviour @xmath528 and a proof @xmath1 , @xmath684 is derivable if and only if @xmath685 . similarly for the negative case . before proving the theorem , let us recall a well - established method for proving gdel completeness based on proof search ( often attributed to schtte @xcite ) . it proceeds as follows : 1 . given an unprovable sequent @xmath608 , find an open branch in the cut - free proof search tree . 2 . from the open branch , build a countermodel @xmath2 in which @xmath608 is false . the proof below follows the same line of argument . we can naturally adapt ( 1 ) to our setting , since the bottom - up cut - free proof search in our proof system is deterministic in the sense that at most one rule applies at each step . moreover , it never gets stuck at the negative sequent , since a negative rule is always applicable bottom - up . adapting ( 2 ) is more delicate . for simplicity , we assume that the sequent @xmath686 is positive ; the argument below can be easily adapted to the negative case . so , suppose that a positive sequent @xmath687 with @xmath688 does not have a derivation . by knig s lemma , there exists a branch @xmath689 in the cut - free proof search tree , @xmath690 which is _ either _ finite and has the topmost sequent @xmath691 with @xmath692 to which no rule applies anymore , _ or _ infinite . in the latter case , we set @xmath693 . our goal is to build models @xmath694 such that @xmath695 ] \!]}= \omega.\ ] ] more generally , we define negative designs 1 . @xmath696 for every @xmath310 ( @xmath697 if @xmath698 ) ; 2 . @xmath699 for every variable @xmath75 occurring in the branch . below , @xmath95 and @xmath73 stand for logical connectives : @xmath488 , @xmath700 . to define @xmath696 we distinguish three cases : ( i ) when @xmath701 and @xmath702 , let @xmath703 . \(ii ) when @xmath704 and @xmath705 , suppose that @xmath691 is of the form @xmath706 but @xmath707 so that the proof search gets stuck . then let @xmath708 . recall that the partial sum @xmath709 has @xmath710 as component by our convention . \(iii ) for @xmath711 , suppose that the relevant part of the branch @xmath689 is of the form : @xmath712{z|\coa\langle m_1,\ldots , m_{{k-1 } } , { \textstyle\sum}b(\vy).p_{i+1 } , m_{k+1},\ldots , m_{{m}}\rangle\vdash \btheta_i } { \infer[(\beta)]{{\textstyle\sum}b(\vy ) . \vdash \btheta_i , \bn_{i_k } } { \infer*{p_{i+1 } \vdash \btheta_i , y_1 : \bq_1 , \dots , y_l : \bq_l}{}}}},\ ] ] where @xmath713 contains @xmath714 , @xmath715 with @xmath716 , and @xmath717 @xmath718 , @xmath719 with @xmath720 . namely , the situation is as follows ( to be read bottom - up ) : 1 . the head variable of @xmath721 is @xmath627 , so @xmath714 is chosen from the context @xmath713 and the rule @xmath617 is applied . among @xmath497 upper sequents , the @xmath499th one is taken in the branch . @xmath722 is negative , and the unique negative behaviour in @xmath723 is @xmath717 @xmath718 , so the rule @xmath724 is applied . among the upper sequents ( recall that there is one sequent for each action in @xmath725 ) , the one corresponding to @xmath726 is taken in the branch . in this case , we define @xmath727 here , the main additive component of @xmath696 begins with @xmath728 because ( 1 ) @xmath721 begins with the positive action @xmath31 , ( 2 ) the @xmath499th upper sequent is taken in the branch , and ( 3 ) the upper sequent corresponding to @xmath729 is taken . the other additive components @xmath730 are needed to ensure that our countermodel belongs to the behaviour @xmath731 ( see lemma [ l - comp ] ( 1 ) ) . the subdesigns @xmath732 are given by @xmath733 notice that each @xmath734 is a negative design , so the above conjunction is a defined operation ( in the sense of definition [ conj extension ] ( 2 ) ) . we claim that @xmath696 is well - defined , because variables @xmath71 are chosen fresh , so do not appear freely below @xmath735 . hence subdesigns @xmath732 do not have @xmath736 with @xmath737 as conjunct . namely , @xmath696 depends only on @xmath734 with @xmath738 . this gives rise to a recursive procedure and @xmath696 arises in the limit of the procedure . notice also that the set @xmath739 can be empty and in such a case , we have that @xmath740 . the above is an instance of corecursive definition . it is possible to formally justify it by employing _ design generators _ developed in @xcite ( see in particular theorem 2.12 of @xcite ) . an alternative way is to define @xmath696 ( and @xmath741 ) as the limit of its finite approximations . here we briefly outline this latter approach . we assume that @xmath693 . the idea is to chop off the branch @xmath689 at height @xmath742 , where @xmath742 is an arbitrary natural number , and define finite approximations @xmath743 and @xmath744 . then @xmath696 and @xmath741 arise as the limit when @xmath745 . more concretely , given a natural number @xmath742 , we define @xmath743 by downward induction from @xmath746 to @xmath747 as follows : 1 . when @xmath748 , the sequent @xmath749 is of the form @xmath750 . we let @xmath751 . when @xmath752 , we proceed as in the case ( iii ) above . namely , @xmath753 where actions @xmath93 , @xmath754 and the index @xmath755 are determined as before . now observe that the sequence @xmath756 is `` monotone increasing '' in the sense that @xmath757 has more conjuncts than @xmath758 whenever @xmath759 . the same for @xmath760 with @xmath761 . hence we can naturally obtain the `` limits '' @xmath762 this construction ends up with the same as the previous recursive one . observe that each @xmath696 and @xmath699 thus constructed are surely models , atomic linear designs . theorem [ full completeness ] is a direct consequence of the following two lemmas . the first lemma crucially rests on _ induction on logical behaviours _ , that is an analogue of _ induction on formulas _ , which lies at the core of logical completeness in many cases . [ l - comp ] for @xmath763 appearing in the branch @xmath689 above , suppose that @xmath721 has a head variable @xmath627 and @xmath764 . then : 1 . @xmath765 ; 2 . @xmath766 . by induction on the construction of @xmath767 . 1 . suppose that @xmath704 . since @xmath80 does not have a head variable , the case ( i ) does not apply . hence we are in the case ( ii ) , namely @xmath768 , for some logical connective @xmath95 and logical behaviours @xmath532 . thus , @xmath769 , and @xmath708 . + by internal completeness for negative connectives ( theorem [ t - negative ] ) , we have @xmath770 where @xmath771 and the expression @xmath772 abbreviates the positive context @xmath773 . since @xmath774 trivially holds for every @xmath512 , we have @xmath775 . + when @xmath776 , the case ( iii ) applies . in the same notation , we have that @xmath777 , @xmath717 @xmath778 , and @xmath779 where actions @xmath93 , @xmath754 , the index @xmath755 and the variables @xmath780 are determined by the relevant part of the branch @xmath689 as described above . + by induction hypothesis on ( 2 ) , we have that @xmath781 . hence , @xmath782 . since @xmath783 are atomic ( closed ) , we may derive @xmath784 . we also have @xmath785 for every @xmath786 . hence , by internal completeness again , @xmath787 . 2 . it follows from ( 1 ) since @xmath788 is a negative logical behaviour and so closed under @xmath21 ( theorem [ p - log ] ( 4 ) ) . the proof of the next lemma suggests a similarity between the construction of our countermodels and the _ bhm - out _ technique ( see , @xcite ) , that constructs a suitable term context in order to visit a specific position in the bhm tree of a given @xmath16-term . recall that the initial sequent of our open branch @xmath689 is @xmath687 with @xmath688 , so that @xmath789 . we have : [ l - bohm ] @xmath695 ] \ ! ] } = \omega.\ ] ] we first prove that there is a reduction sequence @xmath790 { -\!\!\!\!\!\rightharpoonup}^ * p_{i+1 } [ \cm(w_1)/w_1 , \dots , \cm(w_t)/w_t]\ ] ] for any @xmath776 , where @xmath791 and @xmath792 are the free variables of @xmath721 and @xmath793 , respectively . suppose that @xmath721 is as in the case ( iii ) above , so has the head variable @xmath794 . by writing @xmath795 $ ] for @xmath796 $ ] and noting that @xmath797 is a ( defined ) conjunction that contains @xmath798 as conjunct , we have : @xmath799 & = & \cm(z ) \ | \ \coa\langle m_1[\theta],\ldots , m_{{k-1}}[\theta ] , { \textstyle\sum}b(\vy).p_{i+1}[\theta ] , m_{k+1}[\theta],\ldots , m_{{m}}[\theta]\rangle \\ & { -\!\!\!\!\!\rightharpoonup } & \left({\textstyle\sum}b(\vy).p_{i+1}[\theta]\right ) \ ; & { -\!\!\!\!\!\rightharpoonup } & p_{i+1}[\theta , \cm(y_{1})/ y_{1 } , \ldots , \cm(y_{l})/y_{l}],\\ \end{array}\ ] ] as desired . when @xmath693 , we have obtained an infinite reduction sequence from @xmath800 $ ] . otherwise , @xmath800 { -\!\!\!\!\!\rightharpoonup}^ * p_{max}[\theta]$ ] , for some substitution @xmath795 $ ] . in case ( i ) , we have @xmath801 = \omega$ ] , while in case ( ii ) , we have @xmath802 . so , @xmath803 = z|\coc\langle \vec{m}\rangle [ \theta ] = \cm(z)|\coc\langle \vec{m}[\theta]\rangle { -\!\!\!\!\!\rightharpoonup}\omega,\ ] ] because @xmath797 contains @xmath709 as conjunct , and @xmath804 has @xmath710 as component . theorem [ full completeness ] now follows easily . suppose that @xmath805 is not derivable . then we obtain models @xmath806 , , @xmath807 by lemma [ l - comp ] and @xmath808 ] \!]}=\omega$ ] by lemma [ l - bohm ] . this means that @xmath809 . our explicit construction of the countermodels yields a by - product : [ lowen ] 1 . let @xmath1 be a proof and @xmath528 a logical behaviour . if @xmath810 , then there is a countable model @xmath811 ( @xmath812 is a countable set ) such that @xmath813 . 2 . furthermore , when @xmath1 is linear , there is a finite and deterministic model @xmath811 such that @xmath813 . the second statement is due to the observation that when @xmath1 is linear the positive rule @xmath617 can be replaced with a linear variant : @xmath814{z|\coa\langle m_1 , \dots , m_m \rangle\vdash \bgamma , z:\coal\langle\bn_1 , \dots , \bn_n\rangle } { m_1 \vdash \bgamma_1 , \bn_{i_1 } & \dots & m_m \vdash \bgamma_m , \bn_{i_m}},\ ] ] where @xmath815 are disjoint subsets of @xmath444 . we then immediately see that the proof search tree is always finite , and so is the model @xmath699 . it is deterministic , since each variable occurs at most once as head variable in a branch so that all conjunctions are at most unary . we have presented a gdel - like completeness theorem for proofs in the framework of ludics , aiming at linking completeness theorems for provability with those for proofs . we have explicitly constructed a countermodel against any failed proof attempt , following schtte s idea based on cut - free proof search . our proof employs knig s lemma and reveals a sharp opposition between finite proofs and infinite models , leading to a clear analogy with lwenhein - skolem theorem . our proof also employs an analogue of the bhm - out technique @xcite ( see the proof of lemma [ l - bohm ] ) , though it does not lead to the separation property ( remark [ r - separation ] ) . in hyland - ong game semantics , player s innocent strategies most naturally correspond to possibly infinite bhm trees ( see , @xcite ) . one could of course impose finiteness ( or compactness ) on them to have correspondence with finite proofs . but it would not lead to an explicit construction of opponent s strategies defeating infinite proof attempts . although finiteness is imposed in @xcite too , our current work shows that it is not necessary in ludics . our work also highlights the duality : @xmath816 the principle is that _ when proofs admit contraction , models have to be nondeterministic _ ( whereas they do not have to be nonlinear ) . a similar situation arises in some variants of @xmath16-calculus and linear logic , when one proves the separation property . we mention @xcite , where the authors add a nondeterministic choice operator and a numeral system to the pure @xmath16-calculus in order to internally ( interactively ) discriminate two pure @xmath16-terms that have different bhm trees . however , in contrast to our work , the nondeterminism needed for their purpose is of existential nature : a term converges if at least one of the possible reduction sequences starting from it terminates . in @xcite , the separation property for differential interaction nets @xcite is proven . a key point is that the exponential modalities in differential interaction nets are more `` symmetrical '' than in linear logic . in our setting , the symmetry shows up between nonlinearity and nondeterministic conjunctions ( nonuniform elements ) . it is typically found in theorem [ p - duphalf ] , which reveals a tight connection between duplicability of positive logical behaviours and closure under nondeterministic conjunctions of negative logical behaviours . similar nonuniform structures naturally arise in various semantical models based on coherence spaces and games , such as finiteness spaces @xcite , indexed linear logic and nonuniform coherence spaces @xcite , nonuniform hypercoherences @xcite , and asynchronous games @xcite ( see also @xcite ) . for future work , we plan to extend our setting by enriching the proof system with propositional variables , second order quantifiers and nonlogical axioms . by moving to the second order setting , we hope to give an _ interactive _ account to gdel s incompleteness theorems as well . we are deeply indebted to pierre - louis curien , who gave us a lot of useful comments . our thanks are also due to the anonymous referees . 10 andreoli , j .- : logic programming with focusing proofs in linear logic . * 2*(3 ) ( 1992 ) 297347 . barendregt , h. p. : the lambda calculus : its syntax and semantics . north - holland ( 1981 ) . basaldella , m. , faggian , c. : ludics with repetition ( exponentials , interactive types and completeness ) . in : lics . ( 2009 ) 375384 . bhm , c. : alcune propriet delle forme @xmath817-normali nel @xmath818-calcolo . publicazioni dellistituto per le applicazioni del calcolo * 696 * ( 1968 ) . boudes , p. : non - uniform hypercoherences . notes theor . * 69 * ( 2002 ) 6282 . bucciarelli , a. , ehrhard , t. : on phase semantics and denotational semantics : the exponentials . pure appl . 109*(3 ) ( 2001 ) : 205241 . curien , p .- l . : abstract bhm trees . struct . in comp . * 8*(6 ) ( 1998 ) 559591 . curien , p .- l . : introduction to linear logic and ludics , part ii . advances in mathematics ( china ) * 35*(1 ) ( 2006 ) 144 . curien , p .- l . : notes on game semantics . manuscript ( 2006 ) . curien , p .- , herbelin , h. : abstract machines for dialogue games . panoramas et synthses * 27 * ( 2009 ) 231275 . curien , p .- l . , munch - maccagnoni , g. : the duality of computation under focus . in : proc . of ifip tcs . dezani - ciancaglini , m. , intrigila , b. , venturini - zilli , m. : . in : ictcs98 . ( 1998 ) 123 . ehrhard , t. : finiteness spaces . struct . in comp . * 15*(4 ) ( 2005 ) 615646 . ehrhard , t. , regnier , l. : differential interaction nets . sci . * 364*(2 ) ( 2006 ) 166195 . faggian , c. : travelling on designs . in : csl . ( 2002 ) 427441 . faggian , c. : interactive observability in ludics : the geometry of tests . sci . * 350*(2 ) ( 2006 ) 213233 . faggian , c. , piccolo , m. : ludics is a model for the finitary linear pi - calculus . in : tlca . ( 2007 ) 148162 . faggian , c. , piccolo , m. : partial orders , event structures , and linear strategies . in : tlca . ( 2009 ) 95111 . girard , j .- y . : on the meaning of logical rules i : syntax vs. semantics . in berger , u. , schwichtenberg , h. , eds . : computational logic . heidelberg springer - verlag ( 1999 ) 215272 . girard , j .- y . : on the meaning of logical rules ii : multiplicatives and additives . foundation of secure computation , berger and schwichtenberg edts ( 2000 ) 183212 . girard , j .- y . : locus solum : from the rules of logic to the logic of rules . struct . in comp . sci . * 11*(3 ) ( 2001 ) 301506 . hyland , j.m.e . , ong , c.h.l . : on full abstraction for pcf : i , ii , and iii . * 163*(2 ) ( 2000 ) 285408 . lafont , y. : the finite model property for various fragments of linear logic . j. symb . log . * 62*(4 ) ( 1997 ) 12021208 . laurent , o. : tude de la polarization en logique . phd thesis , univ . aix - marseille ii ( 2002 ) . laurent , o. : polarized games . . logic * 130*(1 - 3 ) ( 2004 ) 79123 . maurel , f. : un cadre quantitatif pour la ludique . phd thesis , univ . paris vii ( 2004 ) . mazza , d. , pagani , m. : the separation theorem for differential interaction nets . in : lpar . ( 2007 ) 393407 . mellis , p .- a . : asynchronous games 2 : the true concurrency of innocence . * 358*(2 - 3 ) ( 2006 ) 200228 . schtte , k. : ein system des verknpfenden schliessens . logic grundlagenf . * 2 * ( 1956 ) 5567 . terui , k. : ludics . ( 2008 ) to appear in theor . in this appendix , we show a correspondence between the proof system for ludics introduced in [ proof system ] and the constant - only propositional fragment of _ polarized linear logic _ @xmath819 @xcite . this will ensure that our proof system is rich enough to capture a constructive variant of constant - only propositional classical logic . we recall the syntax of the constant - only propositional fragment of @xmath819 . the _ formulas _ are split into positive and negative ones and generated by the following grammar : @xmath820 the linear negation is defined in the usual way . sequent _ is of the form @xmath821 with @xmath822 a multiset of formulas . the inference rules of @xmath819 are given below : strict sequents will play a crucial role for the correspondence between @xmath819 and the proof system for ludics ( theorem [ t - llp ] ) . the intuition , which we will formalize later , is that a strict sequent @xmath824 can be thought of as a sequent of the proof system of ludics ( omitting the information about designs ) of the form @xmath825 . a. positive subderivation : @xmath827 that consists of positive inference rules only , where @xmath828 is a positive formula obtained from @xmath829 by applying positive connectives , and @xmath511 . for instance , if @xmath828 is of the form @xmath830 , there are two positive subderivations with conclusion @xmath831 : + @xmath832 b. negative subderivation : @xmath833 that consists of negative inference rules only , where @xmath834 is a negative formula obtained from @xmath835 by applying negative connectives , and @xmath836 consist of formulas in @xmath837 . for instance , if @xmath834 is of the form @xmath838 , then there is ( essentially ) one negative subderivation with conclusion @xmath839 : + @xmath840 c. @xmath841-dereliction : @xmath842 the above decomposition motivates us to cluster the logical connectives of the same polarity into _ synthetic connectives _ ( @xcite ) . consider the expressions finitely generated by : @xmath843 where @xmath75 ranges over the set of variables . we write @xmath844 ( resp.@xmath845 ) to denote the set of variables occurring in @xmath846 ( resp . @xmath847 ) . @xmath846 is a _ positive synthetic connective _ if for every subexpression of @xmath846 of the form @xmath848 , @xmath849 and @xmath850 are disjoint . for instance , @xmath851 is a positive synthetic connective while @xmath852 is not . likewise , @xmath847 is a _ negative synthetic connective _ if for every subexpression of @xmath847 of the form @xmath853 , @xmath854 and @xmath855 are disjoint . this condition is needed when we translate synthetic connectives to logical connectives of ludics . we indicate the variables occurring in @xmath846 by writing @xmath856 , and similarly for @xmath847 . given a negative synthetic connective @xmath847 , its _ dual _ @xmath857 is obtained by replacing @xmath858 with @xmath859 , @xmath860 with @xmath861 , @xmath862 with @xmath863 , @xmath864 with @xmath865 , and @xmath841 with @xmath866 respectively , in each occurrence of symbol . @xmath867 is similarly defined . + the _ formulas _ of @xmath819 are then redefined inductively as follows : @xmath868 where @xmath869 is obtained from @xmath856 by substituting @xmath870 for @xmath871 ( @xmath872 ) . notice that when @xmath873 , @xmath874 can be any combination of @xmath859 and @xmath861 using @xmath863 and @xmath865 . to each positive synthetic connective @xmath875 , we can naturally associate a set of inference rules as follows . consider all possible positive subderivations with conclusion @xmath876 in the sense of ( i ) above . to each such derivation @xmath827 we associate an inference rule : @xmath877 for instance , to @xmath878 , we associate two inference rules : likewise , each negative synthetic connective @xmath880 comes equipped with a unique inference rule derived from the negative subderivation with conclusion @xmath881 ( see ( ii ) above ) . for instance , @xmath882 is equipped with : observe the asymmetry between the positive and negative cases here ; in the negative case , we leave the @xmath841-formulas @xmath884 in the premises . these formulas are to be dealt with by the @xmath841-dereliction rule . 1 . @xmath226 contains a nullary name @xmath521 and a unary name @xmath227 . if @xmath226 contains an @xmath40-ary name @xmath26 and an @xmath497-ary name @xmath69 , it also contains @xmath40-ary names @xmath886 , @xmath887 and an @xmath888-ary name @xmath889 ( example [ linear ] ) . given a negative synthetic connective @xmath847 , we inductively associate a set @xmath890 of negative actions of ludics as follows : @xmath891 notice that when @xmath892 , the variables @xmath37 occur in @xmath847 . hence @xmath893 above is certainly a negative action , since @xmath37 and @xmath71 are disjoint sequences due to the definition of negative synthetic connective . we finally let @xmath894 , where @xmath895 lists the variables occurring in @xmath847 . a positive synthetic connective @xmath846 is interpreted by @xmath896 . for instance , when @xmath878 and @xmath882 , we have @xmath897 with @xmath898 this induces a polarity - preserving translation from the formulas of @xmath819 to the logical behaviours of ludics : @xmath899 to establish a connection with @xmath819 , we simplify the proof system of [ proof system ] by taking its _ skeleton _ , namely by omitting all information about designs . the resulting proof system , which we call @xmath900 , consists of two sorts of inference rules : @xmath618{\vdash \bgamma } { \vdash \bgamma , \bn_{i_1 } & \dots & \vdash \bgamma , \bn_{i_m } & ( \coal\langle\bn_1 , \dots , \bn_n\rangle \in \bgamma ) } \qquad \infer[(\alpha ) ] { \vdash \bgamma , \alpha(\bp_1 , \dots , \bp_n ) } { \{\vdash \bgamma , \bp_{i_1 } , \dots , \bp_{i_m}\}_{a(\vx)\in \alpha_0}}\ ] ] where @xmath488 , @xmath489 , @xmath573 and the indices @xmath620 are determined by the variables @xmath621 . one can annotate derivations in @xmath900 with designs as in section [ proof system ] . therefore the above theorem means that ludics designs can be used as term syntax for @xmath819 , as far as strict sequents and derivations are concerned ( although we have to verify carefully that the translation preserves the reduction relation ) . 1 . to each action @xmath907 , we associate the synthetic connective @xmath908 ( @xmath909 , if @xmath26 is nullary ) ; 2 . to each logical connective @xmath910 , we associate the synthetic connective @xmath911 ( @xmath912 , if @xmath913 ) ; 3 . to each logical behaviour , we associate the formula of @xmath819 @xmath914 4 . to each positive context @xmath915 of system @xmath900 , we associate the multiset @xmath916 of formulas of @xmath819 ; 5 . to each negative context @xmath449 of system @xmath900 , we associate the multiset of formulas @xmath917 . it is routine to define an isomorphism between @xmath918 and @xmath919 ( resp . between @xmath920 and @xmath921 ) in some natural sense . moreover , the translation of a sequent of system @xmath900 always results in a strict sequent of @xmath819 . we therefore conclude by theorem [ t - llp ] : Abstract:

Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.

Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered . Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video . Paper: quantum process tomography ( qpt ) @xcite is a way to completely characterize a quantum process . it is the main tool for experimental characterization of quantum gates , being developed for potential use in a quantum computer . qpt has been realized in numerous experiments , practically in all types of qubit systems , including , e.g. , nmr @xcite , linear optics @xcite , ion traps @xcite , and superconducting qubits @xcite . in this paper we mainly focus on qpt with superconducting qubits , even though our discussion is applicable to other systems as well . unfortunately , qpt requires resources , which scale exponentially with the number of qubits . for @xmath1 ( superconducting ) qubits the number of initial states is usually @xmath2 ( or sometimes @xmath3 ) , and the number of `` measurement directions '' ( state tomography `` rotations '' ) for each initial state is typically @xmath4 ( or @xmath3 ) . each such setup typically requires a few hundred or a few thousand experimental runs . from this scaling it is easy to estimate that the qpt of a 1-qubit or a 2-qubit quantum gate requires a manageable number of experimental runs , while a 3-qubit qpt is rather difficult to realize , and the full qpt with 4 and more qubits seems to be impractical . the problem of exponential scaling of qpt resources with the number of qubits can be mitigated if we do not need full information about a quantum gate operation , but instead need only some information . thus a partial characterization of a multi - qubit operation is an important area of theoretical research @xcite . this includes randomized benchmarking @xcite , which typically provides only one number : the gate fidelity . randomized benchmarking becomes increasingly preferable for superconducting qubits @xcite . another promising way to solve or a least alleviate the problem of exponential scaling is to use a compressed - sensing implementation of qpt @xcite . one more problem with qpt is its sensitivity to state preparation and measurement errors ( spam in the terminology of ref.@xcite ) . randomized benchmarking does not suffer from spam - errors , so this is another reason why this technique is increasingly popular . however , the obvious drawback of randomized benchmarking is that it gives only the total ( average ) error and does not give any information about particular kinds of error . hence , it does not tell us about the origin of a quantum gate imperfection . in this paper we consider standard qpt , which gives full information about the quantum process . because of the scaling problem , we are essentially talking about quantum gates with less than 4 qubits , for which full qpt is a very useful tool . the standard way of representing qpt results is via the process matrix @xmath0 @xcite in the pauli basis ( see the next section ) . unfortunately , this matrix is a rather inconvenient object to work with . even though in principle it contains full information about the process , it does not show useful information in a straightforward way . thus the important problem of converting experimental qpt data into a useful characterization of particular decoherence processes @xcite is not quite simple . besides the standard matrix @xmath0 , there are other ways to represent qpt results . for example , they can be represented via the so - called pauli transfer matrix @xmath5 @xcite . the advantage of using @xmath5 is that it contains only real elements , from @xmath5 it is simple to see whether the quantum operation is trace preserving , also simple to see whether the process is unital , and for any clifford operation there is exactly one non - zero element in each row and column of @xmath5 with unit magnitude . in this paper we discuss one more way of representing the experimental qpt results @xcite . it is essentially the standard @xmath0-matrix representation in the pauli basis , with the only difference being that we factor out the desired unitary operation @xmath6 , so that the error matrix @xmath7 describes only the imperfections of the experimental quantum gate . there are two natural ways to define such an error matrix ( @xmath7 and @xmath8 ) : we can assume that the @xmath6-operation is either before of after the error process ( see fig . 1 below ) . even though in theoretical analyses it is rather usual to separate the error channel and unitary operation , we are not aware of any detailed discussion of the qpt representation by the error matrices . as discussed in this paper , the error matrix @xmath7 ( as well as @xmath8 ) has a number of convenient properties . in particular , its main element is equal to the process fidelity @xmath9 , while other non - zero elements correspond to imperfections . unitary imperfections are directly given by the imaginary parts of the elements along the left column and/or top row . decoherence produces other elements , which have a relatively simple relation to kraus operators characterizing decoherence ( which are the operators in the lindblad equation ) . since the elements of the error matrix are small , most calculations can be approximated to first order , thus making them relatively simple . this includes a relatively simple rule for the composition of quantum operations and accumulation of the error - matrix elements due to the lindblad - form decoherence . the error - matrix representation has already been used in the experimental qpt @xcite . our paper is organized in the following way . in sec.[sec - standard ] we briefly review some properties of the standard process matrix @xmath0 . in sec . [ sec - chi - err ] we introduce the error matrices @xmath7 and @xmath8 , and then in sec . [ sec - properties ] some of their properties are discussed , including physical interpretation . in sec.[sec - comp ] we consider composition of the error processes . then in sec . [ sec - corr ] we discuss the use of the error matrix to find the necessary unitary correction to an experimental quantum gate . in sec . [ sec - lindblad - error ] we consider the contribution to the error matrix from decoherence described by the lindblad - form master equation . a possible identification of spam errors and their subtraction from the error matrix are discussed in sec.[sec - spam ] . finally , sec . [ sec - concl ] is the conclusion . two appendices discuss topics that are somewhat different from the main text . in appendix a we consider several simple examples of the @xmath0-matrix calculation , and in appendix b we discuss an intuitive interpretation of decoherence described by the lindblad - form master equation , unraveling the quantum dynamics into the `` jump '' and `` no jump '' scenarios . a linear quantum operation @xmath10 ( transforming initial density matrix @xmath11 into the final state @xmath12 ) is usually described via the process matrix @xmath0 ( which is hermitian , with non - negative eigenvalues ) , defined as @xcite _ fin= _ m , n _ mn e_m _ ine_n^ , [ chi - def]where the matrices @xmath13 form a basis in the space of complex @xmath14 matrices , which are the linear operators in the @xmath15-dimensional hilbert space of the problem . for example , for @xmath1 qubits @xmath16 ; therefore there are @xmath17 matrices @xmath13 , and the matrix @xmath0 has dimensions @xmath18 . ( note that @xmath13 are operators in the space of wavefunctions , and these operators have the same dimension as density matrices . ) even though in principle any basis @xmath19 ( not necessarily orthogonal @xcite ) can be used in eq . ( [ chi - def ] ) , the most usual choice for a system of qubits is the use of pauli matrices . in this case for one qubit the basis @xmath19 consists of 4 matrices : i , x_x , y_y , z_z , and for several qubits the kronecker product of these matrices is used ; for example for two qubits @xmath20 . note that sometimes a different definition for @xmath21 is used : @xmath22 . also note that the basis of pauli matrices is orthogonal ( under the hilbert - schmidt inner product ) but not normalized @xcite , so that e_m|e_n ( e_m^e_n ) = _ mnd , d=2^n ; [ emen ] this is why normalization by @xmath15 in often needed in the qpt . in this paper we will always assume the pauli basis @xmath19 and use @xmath23 . therefore @xmath24 , but for clarity we will still write @xmath25 in formulas when appropriate . it is simple to find the matrix @xmath0 for a multi - qubit unitary operation @xmath6 . we first need to find its represention in the pauli basis , @xmath26 , and then compare @xmath27 with eq.([chi - def ] ) , which gives _ mn= u_m u_n^ * , u_n = tr(ue_n^ ) , [ chi - u]where the star notation means complex conjugation and the expression for @xmath28 follows from the orthogonality property ( [ emen ] ) . calculation of the matrix @xmath0 for a quantum process with decoherence is usually significantly more cumbersome . some examples are considered in appendix a ( see also , e.g. , @xcite ) . a process is called `` trace - preserving '' if the transformation ( [ chi - def ] ) preserves the trace of the density matrix , i.e. if @xmath29 when @xmath30 . in this case the matrix @xmath0 should satisfy the condition @xmath31 ( which gives @xmath2 real equations ) , and therefore @xmath0 is characterized by @xmath32 real parameters instead of @xmath33 parameters in the general ( non - trace - preserving ) case . in this paper we always assume a trace - preserving operation . the fidelity of a trace - preserving quantum operation compared with a desired unitary operation is usually defined as f_=tr ( ^des ) , [ fidelity]where @xmath34 is for the desired unitary operation and @xmath0 is for the actual operation ( it is easy to show that @xmath35 ) . this definition has direct relation @xcite 1-f_=(1-f_av ) to the average state fidelity @xmath36 , which assumes uniform averaging over all pure initial states . sometimes @xcite @xmath37 is called `` gate fidelity '' while @xmath9 is called `` process fidelity '' . characterization by @xmath38 is usually used in randomized benchmarking @xcite ; it is easy to see that @xmath39 . note that the fidelity definition ( [ fidelity ] ) requires unitary desired operation and trace - preserving actual operation . for a general ( non - unitary ) desired operation ( still assuming trace - preserving operations ) it should be replaced with the `` uhlmann fidelity '' f_= ( tr)^2=(tr)^2 , which is essentially the same definition as for the fidelity between two density matrices @xcite . the process matrix @xmath0 for a non - trivial unitary operation typically has many non - zero elements ( e.g. , 16 elements for the two - qubit controlled-@xmath41 , controlled - not , and @xmath42 operations ) , and it is nice - looking on the standard bar ( `` cityscape '' ) chart used for visualization . however , a large number of non - zero elements ( we will call them `` peaks '' ) creates a problem in visual comparison between the desired and experimental @xmath0-matrices , especially for high - fidelity experiments . a natural way to make it easier to compare between the actual and desired operations is to show the difference between them , i.e. , to show the error . for example , it is possible to calculate and display the difference @xmath43 in the pauli basis . however , such element - by - element difference does not make much sense mathematically . instead , let us represent the actual quantum process as a _ composition _ of the desired unitary @xmath6 and the error process ( fig . 1 ) , and find the process matrix @xmath7 for this error operation . this essentially reduces the comparison between @xmath0 and desired @xmath6 ( we use a loose language here ) to the comparison between @xmath7 and the memory ( identity ) operation . and @xmath8 via their relation to @xmath0 and the desired unitary operation @xmath6 . the time runs from left to right.,width=321 ] so , the general idea is to convert the desired unitary @xmath6 into the memory operation , and this converts @xmath0 into the error process matrix @xmath7 . there are two ways of defining such error matrix : we can place the error process either before or after the desired unitary @xmath6 ( fig . 1 ) . thus , we define two error matrices : @xmath7 and @xmath8 using the relations [ see eq.([chi - def ] ) ] @xmath44 from fig . 1 it is obvious that the process @xmath7 can be represented as the composition of the inverse ideal unitary ( @xmath45 ) and the actual process @xmath0 after that . similarly , @xmath8 is the composition of @xmath0 and inverse unitary @xmath46 after that . hence , @xmath7 and @xmath8 represent legitimate quantum processes and therefore they satisfy all the properties of the usual matrix @xmath0 ( see the previous section ) ; in particular , @xmath7 and @xmath8 are positive hermitian matrices . we will use the standard pauli basis for the error matrices @xmath7 and @xmath8 . using the composition relation , the error matrices can be calculated from @xmath0 as @xcite @xmath47 in an experiment the error process matrices can be calculated either from @xmath0 using these equations or by directly applying the definitions ( [ chi - err - def ] ) and ( [ tilde - chi - err - def ] ) to the experimental data . for example , to find @xmath8 the measured final density matrices can be transformed numerically as @xmath48 and then the usual procedure of @xmath0 calculation can be applied . note that the matrix @xmath7 can be thought of as the @xmath0-matrix in the rotated basis @xmath49 instead of @xmath19 ; similarly , @xmath8 is formally the @xmath0-matrix in the basis @xmath50 ; however , we will not use this language to avoid possible confusion . in the ideal ( desired ) case both error processes @xmath7 and @xmath8 are equal to the perfect memory ( identity ) operation , @xmath51 , for which ^*i*_mn=_m0_n0 , [ memory]where with index 0 we denote the left column and/or the top row , which correspond to the unity basis element ( in the usual notation @xmath52 for one qubit , @xmath53 for two qubits , etc . ) ; the process matrix ( [ memory ] ) is given by eq . ( [ chi - u ] ) with @xmath54 . so , in the ideal case the error matrices have only one non - zero element at the top left corner : @xmath55 . therefore , _ any other non - zero element in @xmath7 ( or @xmath8 ) indicates an imperfection of the quantum operation_. this is the main advantage in working with @xmath7 or @xmath56 instead of the usual matrix @xmath0 . there are also some other advantages discussed below . the standard process fidelity ( [ fidelity ] ) for a trace - preserving operation has a very simple form for the error matrices . since @xmath0 , @xmath7 , and @xmath8 are essentially the same operator in different bases , we have @xmath57 . therefore f_= _ 00^err= _ 00^err , [ f - chi - error]i.e . the process fidelity is just the height of the main ( top left ) element of the error matrix @xmath7 or @xmath56 . a systematic unitary error can be easily detected ( to first order ) in the error matrix @xmath7 or @xmath8 because it appears at a special location : it produces non - zero imaginary elements along the top row and left column of the matrix , i.e. the elements @xmath58 with @xmath59 ( similarly for @xmath8 ) . to see this fact , let us assume that instead of the desired unitary operation @xmath6 , the quantum gate actually realizes a slightly imperfect unitary @xmath60 . then @xmath7 corresponds to the unitary @xmath61 , which can be expanded in the pauli basis as @xmath62 . since @xmath63 , we have @xmath64 and @xmath65 . note that @xmath66 can always be chosen real because @xmath67 is defined up to an overall phase . now let us show that to first order all @xmath68 are purely imaginary . this follows from the first - order expansion of the equation @xmath69 , which gives @xmath70 . hence , @xmath71 for @xmath59 ( purely imaginary @xmath72 ) , and the difference @xmath73 is only of second order ( for a real @xmath66 ) . another way of showing that in the first order @xmath68 are imaginary is by using representation @xmath74 ( neglecting the overall phase ) with a hermitian matrix @xmath75 , so that the expansion @xmath76 contains all real coefficients , while to first order @xmath77 and @xmath78 . now using eq . ( [ chi - u ] ) we see that to first order the only non - zero elements ( except @xmath79 ) are ( ^err_n0)=-im(^ err_0n ) -i u^err_n , n0 . [ imag - unitary]note that the diagonal elements @xmath80 ( as well as the change of @xmath79 ) in this case are of second order . in particular , in this approximation @xmath81 . as discussed later , if decoherence causes a significant decrease of the fidelity @xmath9 , then a better approximation of the systematic unitary error effect is eq . ( [ imag - unitary ] ) multiplied by the fidelity , ( ^err_n0)-i f_u^err_n . [ imag - unitary-2 ] using this equation it is possible to find @xmath82 from an experimental matrix @xmath7 and therefore estimate the systematic unitary error @xmath67 in the experiment . the same property ( [ imag - unitary ] ) [ and its version ( [ imag - unitary-2 ] ) corrected for @xmath9 ] can be shown for @xmath8 using the similar derivation for the unitary imperfection @xmath84 . the elements @xmath85 are different compared with the matrix elements of @xmath7 ; they are related via the equation @xmath86 or equivalent equation @xmath87 . decoherence produces additional small peaks in the error matrix @xmath7 ( and/or @xmath8 ) . as discussed later , to first order these peaks are linear in the decoherence strength and simply additive for different decoherence mechanisms . therefore , to first order we have a weighted sum of different patterns in @xmath7 for different mechanisms . if these patterns for the most common decoherence mechanisms are relatively simple , then there is a rather straightforward way of extracting information on decoherence from experimental @xmath7 matrix . in sec . [ sec - lindblad - error ] we will discuss the general way to calculate the first - order pattern for a particular decoherence mechanism ; for a practical quantum gate this pattern may contain many elements . a special role is played by the real elements along the top row and left column of @xmath7 ( or @xmath8 ) : they correspond to the gradual non - unitary ( `` bayesian '' ) evolution in the absence of the `` jumps '' due to decoherence ( in contrast to the imaginary elements , which correspond to the unitary imperfection ) see discussion later . note that the diagonal matrix elements of @xmath7 are the error probabilities in the so - called pauli twirling approximation @xcite . therefore these elements can be used in simulation codes , which use the pauli twirling approximation for the analysis of quantum algorithms in multi - qubit systems . concluding this section , we emphasize that the error matrix @xmath7 ( and/or @xmath8 ) is just a minor modification of the standard @xmath0 matrix ; they are related by a linear transformation and therefore equivalent to each other . however , in the error matrix only one peak ( at the top left corner ) corresponds to the desired operation , while other peaks indicate imperfections . this makes the error matrix more convenient to work with , when we analyze deviations of an experimental quantum operation from a desired unitary and try to extract information about the main decoherence mechanisms . in this paper we always assume high - fidelity operations , 1-f_1 , [ high - fid]so that the first - order approximation of imperfections is quite accurate . since the error matrix @xmath7 is positive , its off - diagonal elements have the upper bound |^err_mn| . ( the same is true for @xmath8 , but for brevity we discuss here only @xmath7 . ) therefore for a high - fidelity operation ( [ high - fid ] ) only the elements in the left column and top row can be relatively large , @xmath88 , while other off - diagonal element have a smaller upper bound , @xmath89 , because all diagonal elements except @xmath90 are small . actually , it is possible to show ( see below ) that @xmath91 are also small , @xmath92 , so only @xmath93 can be relatively large . the elements @xmath93 and @xmath94 play a special role because a unitary imperfection produce them in the first order , while other elements are of second order [ see eq . ( [ chi - u ] ) and discussion in the previous section ] . it is easy to see that @xmath95 and @xmath94 can approach @xmath96 if the error is dominated by the unitary imperfection . the physical intuition in analyzing the error of a quantum gate is that the ( small ) infidelity @xmath97 comes from small unitary imperfections and from rare but `` strong '' decoherence processes , which cause `` jumps '' that significantly change the state . as discussed later , this picture should also be complemented by small non - unitary state change in the case when no jump occurred ( this change is essentially the quantum bayesian update @xcite due to the information that there was no jump ) . it is not easy to formalize this intuition mathematically ; however , there is a closely related procedure . let us diagonalize the error matrix @xmath7 , so that ^err= tdt^-1 , [ diag - chi - err]where @xmath98 is a unitary @xmath99 matrix and @xmath100 is the diagonal matrix containing @xmath101 real eigenvalues of @xmath7 . these eigenvalues are non - negative , and we can always choose @xmath98 so that in @xmath102 they are ordered as @xmath103 . the sum of the eigenvalues is equal 1 ( since we consider trace - preserving operations ) and the largest eigenvalue @xmath104 is close to 1 because @xmath105 . [ here @xmath106 because any diagonal element of a hermitian matrix should be in between the largest and smallest eigenvalues , as follows from expanding the corresponding basis vector in the eigenbasis . ] all other eigenvalues are small because @xmath107 . the diagonalization ( [ diag - chi - err ] ) directly gives the evolution representation via the kraus operators @xcite , @xmath108 in which the operators @xmath109 form an orthogonal basis , @xmath110 [ see eq . ( [ emen ] ) ] because @xmath98 is unitary . recall that @xmath6 is the desired unitary gate see eq.([chi - err - def ] ) . the main term in the kraus - operator representation ( [ kraus - representation ] ) is the term with @xmath111 ; let us show that @xmath112 ( up to an overall phase , which can always be eliminated ) ; this means @xmath113 and @xmath114 for @xmath59 [ note that @xmath115 because @xmath98 is unitary ; therefore it is sufficient to show that @xmath113 ] . this can be done in the following way . since ^err_mn=_k _ k a_m^(k)(a_n^(k))^ * , [ chi - via - a]the fidelity is f_=_k_k |a_0^(k)|^2 . [ f - sum - k ] the contribution of the terms with @xmath117 to the fidelity is at least smaller than @xmath97 because this is the bound for @xmath118 and @xmath119 for a unitary @xmath98 ( this contribution is actually even much smaller , as discussed below ) . therefore @xmath120 , and so @xmath121 . choosing real @xmath122 , we obtain @xmath113 , and therefore @xmath123 . since @xmath124 is close to @xmath125 and other @xmath109 are orthogonal to @xmath124 , the components @xmath126 are small for @xmath117 . using the relation @xmath127 ( since @xmath98 is unitary ) , we find the bound @xmath128 . now using @xmath129 , @xmath130 ( see the previous paragraph ) , we obtain @xmath131 , neglecting the terms of the order @xmath132 . this means that the contribution to the fidelity ( [ f - sum - k ] ) from the kraus operators with @xmath133 is limited at least by @xmath134 [ neglecting the order @xmath135 , and therefore a good approximation for the fidelity is f__0 |a_0^(0)|^2 , 1-f_(1-|a_0^(0)|^2 ) + ( 1-_0 ) , [ f - separation]which corresponds to the intuitive separation of the infidelity @xmath97 into the `` coherent '' error @xmath136 and the error @xmath137 due to rare but strong decoherence `` jumps '' . thus the kraus - operator representation ( [ kraus - representation ] ) can be crudely interpreted in the following way . after the desired unitary @xmath6 , we apply the kraus operator @xmath112 with the probability @xmath111 , while with small remaining probabilities @xmath138 we apply very different ( orthogonal to @xmath124 ) kraus operators @xmath109 . imperfection of @xmath124 ( compared with @xmath139 ) leads to the `` coherent '' error @xmath136 with @xmath140 . other kraus operators are practically orthogonal to @xmath141 , so they correspond to `` strong decoherence '' and practically always lead to an error , which happens with the total probability @xmath142 , thus explaining eq . ( [ f - separation ] ) . while this interpretation seems to be quite intuitive , there are two caveats . first , it is incorrect to say that @xmath109 is applied with the probability @xmath138 . instead , we should say @xcite that the evolution scenario |_in , _ in occurs with the probability @xmath143 , which depends on the initial state and is equal to @xmath138 only on average , @xmath144 , after averaging over pure initial states . [ this can be proven by using @xmath145 and @xmath146 . ] note that the operators @xmath109 can violate the inequality @xmath147 , even though @xmath148 is always satisfied . the second caveat is that @xmath124 is not necessarily unitary , as would be naively expected for the separation into a coherent operation and decoherence . the non - unitary part of @xmath124 can be interpreted as due to the absence of jumps @xmath149 , similar to the null - result evolution @xcite ( see below and also discussions in sec . [ sec - lindblad - error ] and appendix b ) . we may include both contributions ( imperfect unitary part and non - unitary part of @xmath124 ) into what we call the `` coherent error '' , so it is characterized by the difference between @xmath124 and @xmath139 ( probably it is better to call it the `` gradual error '' ) . with understanding of these two caveats , the discussed above interpretation of the kraus representation ( [ kraus - representation ] ) can be useful for gaining some intuition . note that the contribution to @xmath7 [ see eq.([chi - via - a ] ) ] from the imperfection of the main kraus operator @xmath124 mainly causes the elements @xmath150 in the top row and left column of the error matrix ( other elements are of the second order in the imperfection ) . in contrast , other ( `` decoherence jump '' ) operators @xmath109 mainly produce other elements of @xmath151 ; their contribution to @xmath152 is limited by @xmath153 , as follows from the positivity of @xmath154 , which gives @xmath155 , and the derived above inequality @xmath156 . significant contributions to the diagonal elements of @xmath151 may come from both @xmath124 and @xmath149 . therefore , we can apply the following approximate procedure to crudely separate the error matrix , ^err=^coh + ^dec , ^coh_mn= _ 0 a_m^(0)(a_n^(0))^ * , [ chi - coh - dec]into the `` coherent '' ( or `` gradual '' ) part @xmath157 and `` strong decoherence '' @xmath158 [ see eq . ( [ chi - via - a ] ) ] . we first estimate the `` coherent probability '' @xmath104 as _ 0 f_/ ( 1-_n>0 estimation @xmath159 . using @xmath104 and @xmath160 we can construct @xmath161 , while the remaining part of @xmath7 is @xmath158 . the diagonal elements @xmath80 with @xmath59 ( error probabilities ) are thus separated into the contributions @xmath162 due to `` strong decoherence '' . a further simplification of this procedure is to approximate the coherent part as @xmath163 for @xmath164 , @xmath165 , and @xmath166 . one more useful approach for the intuitive understanding of @xmath7 elements along the left column and top row is the following . using the completeness relation ( [ kraus - representation ] ) we can write the main ( `` coherent '' ) kraus operator in the polar decomposition representation as @xmath167 where @xmath168 is some unitary , which corresponds to the unitary imperfection [ since the overall phase is arbitrary , we can choose @xmath169 . then let us expand the operators in the pauli basis , @xmath170 where @xmath82 and @xmath171 are the expansion components , and we introduced the naturally defined unitary error @xmath172 and decoherence error @xmath173 ( average probability of `` jumps '' ) . now using eq . ( [ f - separation ] ) and neglecting the second - order products @xmath174 , we find the intuitively expected formula for fidelity , f_1 - e_u -e_d . similarly , taking into account only the contribution from the main kraus operator , for the elements @xmath175 with @xmath59 we find ^err_n0 ( 1-_u- e_d ) u^err_n + ( 1-e_u-_d ) . [ chi - n0-approx]here @xmath176 are purely imaginary ( in the first order ) because @xmath67 is unitary , while @xmath171 are real because eq.([expansion - dec ] ) is the expansion of a hermitian operator . therefore , we see that the imaginary parts of the elements @xmath177 are due to unitary imperfection , while their real parts come from the absence of `` jumps '' ( described by kraus operators with @xmath133 ) via eq . ( [ a0-pd ] ) . it is easy to see that the evolution @xmath178 is essentially the bayesian update of the quantum state @xcite due the absence of jumps . in experiments with superconducting qubits the quantum gate infidelity is usually dominated by decoherence , @xmath179 , unless the unitary part is very inaccurate . we will often assume this situation implicitly . in this case case @xmath180 , and from eq . ( [ chi - n0-approx ] ) we obtain eq . ( [ imag - unitary-2 ] ) . using eqs . ( [ expansion - dec ] ) and ( [ chi - n0-approx ] ) we can show the bound @xmath181 . the starting point is to see that all components of @xmath182 in the pauli basis are not larger than 1 , i.e. @xmath183 for any @xmath184 . this is because @xmath185 and the product of two pauli operators is a pauli operator ( with a phase factor ) ; therefore a particular ( say , @xmath184th ) component is essentially a sum of pairwise products of the `` vector coordinates '' @xmath186 and the same coordinates @xmath187 in a different order ( also , with phase factors ) . therefore , the sum of products is limited by the norms of the two vectors , which is 1 for both vectors ( @xmath188 are limited by 1 , the sum of @xmath189th contributions to @xmath171 in eq . ( [ expansion - dec ] ) is limited by @xmath190 . this gives @xmath191 via eq . ( [ chi - n0-approx ] ) . since the elements @xmath192 are small , so that their second - order contributions to the diagonal elements are practically negligible , @xmath193 ^ 2\leq ( 1-f_\chi)^2/4 $ ] , it does not matter much whether we include the evolution due to the `` no - jump '' bayesian update into the `` coherent part '' ( [ chi - coh - dec ] ) or not . note that this bayesian evolution does not produce an additional error since @xmath194/d=1-\frac{1}{2}\sum_{k>0}\lambda_k=1-(1-\lambda_0)/2 $ ] and therefore from eq . ( [ a0-pd ] ) we see that @xmath195 , i.e. the `` no - jump '' scenario brings only the unitary error . in this section we discussed only the error matrix @xmath7 ; however , the same analysis can be also applied to @xmath8 . the relation between the error matrices is @xcite ^err = w_(u)^errw_(u)^ , ^err = w_(u)^^err w_(u ) , [ w - transf]where the unitary matrix @xmath196 corresponds to the effective change of the basis @xmath197 due to @xmath6 , w_(u),mn= tr ( e_m^u e_n u^)/d . [ w - def]note that @xmath198 . it is convenient to think that the @xmath199-transformation ( [ w - transf ] ) is due to the error matrix `` jumping over '' the unitary @xmath6 ( see fig . 1 ) . it is easy to see from eq . ( [ w - def ] ) that @xmath200 ; therefore for an ideal memory @xmath201 and eq . ( [ w - transf ] ) essentially transforms only the difference from the ideal memory . the @xmath202-transformation @xmath203 ( [ w - transf ] ) obviously corresponds to the unitary transformation of kraus operators @xmath109 , `` jumping over '' @xmath6 to the left ( fig . 1 ) , _ k= u^a_k u . these @xmath204 form the kraus - operator representation of @xmath8 with the same `` probabilities '' @xmath138 . let us calculate the error matrix @xmath7 for the composition of two quantum operations : desired unitary @xmath205 with error process @xmath206 and after that the desired unitary @xmath207 with error @xmath208 ( fig . 2 ) . it is obvious that the resulting desired unitary is @xmath209 ( note that the matrix multiplication is from right to left , while on the quantum circuit diagrams the time runs from left to right ) . we assume sufficiently high fidelity of both operations , @xmath210 , @xmath211 [ for brevity we omit the subscript @xmath0 in the notation ( [ f - chi - error ] ) for fidelity ] . over the unitary @xmath207.,width=321 ] let us start with the simple case when there are no unitaries , @xmath212 . then the relation between the initial state @xmath11 and the final state @xmath12 is _ fin = _ m , n , p , q ^err_1 , mn ^err_2 , pq e_p e_m _ in e_n^e_q^ , which leads to the usual lengthy expression for the composition of two operations : ^err_ab= _ m , n , p , q ^err_1 , mn ^err_2 , pq ( e_p e_m e_a^ ) tr ( e_q e_n e_b^)^ * , [ comp - gen]where we used relation e_p e_m= _ a ( e_p e_m e_a^ ) e_a ( actually there is only one non - zero term in this relation , but there is no simple way to write it ) . equation ( [ comp - gen ] ) is valid for any two operations ( not necessarily error processes ) and is very inconvenient to use . fortunately , it is greatly simplified for the error processes , since @xmath213 and @xmath214 contain only one large ( close to one ) element , @xmath215 and @xmath216 , while all other elements are small . therefore we can use the first order approximation of eq . ( [ comp - gen ] ) , which gives the simple additive relation @xmath217 for all elements except the main element @xmath79 . the approximation ( [ comp - err-2 ] ) can also be written as ^err _ 1^err+ _ 2^err-^*i*. [ comp - err - matrix ] obviously , it is much easier to deal with the composition of error processes than with the composition of general quantum processes . note that eq . ( [ comp - err ] ) can also be naturally understood using the kraus - operator representation ( [ kraus - representation ] ) in the case when infidelity is dominated by decoherence . the approximation ( [ comp - err ] ) neglects the second - order corrections due to possibly significant coherent errors . while this is good enough for the off - diagonal elements of @xmath7 , let us use a better approximation for the more important diagonal elements ( except @xmath90 ) , explicitly taking into account the top rows and left columns of @xmath218 and @xmath208 in eq . ( [ comp - gen ] ) , _ nn^err f_2 _ 1,nn^err+ f_1 _ 2,nn^err + 2 im(^err_1 , 0n ) im(^err_2 , 0n ) , [ comp - diag ] where the formally similar term @xmath219 is neglected , because the elements @xmath220 can not be relatively large , in contrast to @xmath221 . for the fidelity the exact and approximate results are @xmath222 where the similar term @xmath223 is neglected again . note that @xmath224 calculated using approximations ( [ comp - diag ] ) and ( [ comp - err - fid2 ] ) is slightly smaller than 1 , but the difference is of second order in infidelity . the reason for taking a special care of the elements @xmath225 and @xmath226 becomes clear if we consider the composition of small unitaries @xmath227 and @xmath228 . then the approximate addition ( [ comp - err-2 ] ) is valid for the first - order off - diagonal elements of @xmath7 ( which are in the left column and top row ) ; however , the diagonal elements are of second order , and for them the errors add up `` coherently '' , generating the `` interference '' term @xmath229 in eq . ( [ comp - diag ] ) . note that the neglected terms @xmath230 have a somewhat similar origin , considering the `` coherent '' composition of the main ( `` no - jump '' ) kraus operators in the representation ( [ kraus - representation ] ) . we emphasize that eqs . ( [ comp - err])([comp - err - fid2 ] ) do not change if we exchange the sequence of @xmath218 and @xmath208 . so in this approximation small imperfections of quantum `` memory '' operations commute with each other , as intuitively expected . note that for the fidelity ( [ comp - err - fid1 ] ) this result is exact : commutation of arbitrary error processes does not change @xmath9 . so far we assumed @xmath212 . now let us consider arbitrary desired unitaries @xmath205 and @xmath207 . then @xmath7 for the composition can be calculated in two steps ( see fig . 2 ) : we first exchange the sequence of @xmath218 and @xmath207 , thus producing the effective error process @xmath231 , and then use the discussed above rule for the composition of two `` memory '' operations @xmath231 and @xmath232 . the transformation of @xmath218 when it `` jumps over '' @xmath207 ( fig . 2 ) is essentially the same as the transformation between @xmath8 and @xmath7 [ see fig . 1 ] and is given by the equation ^err_1(u_2 ) = w_(u_2 ) ^err_1w_(u_2)^ , [ chi - err - jump]where @xmath233 is given by eq . ( [ w - def ] ) . this transformation can also be written as ^err_1(u_2 ) = ^*i*+ w_(u_2 ) ( ^err_1-^*i * ) w^_(u_2 ) , so that only the small difference from the ideal memory operation @xmath234 is being transformed . note that this transformation does not change fidelity , @xmath235 . thus we have a relatively simple procedure to find @xmath7 for the composition of two quantum operations : we first apply the transformation ( [ chi - err - jump ] ) to move the two error processes together ( fig . 2 ) and then apply approximate rules ( [ comp - err])([comp - err - fid2 ] ) to the matrices @xmath236 and @xmath208 . the similar procedure can be used to calculate @xmath8 for the composition of two quantum operations . we should first move @xmath237 to the left by jumping it over @xmath205 , ^err_2(u_1)= w^_(u_1 ) ^ err_2w_(u_1 ) , [ chi-2-u1]and then use the approximate composition rules ( [ comp - err])([comp - err - fid2 ] ) for the error matrices @xmath238 and @xmath239 . for the composition of several quantum operations @xmath240 , the error processes should be first moved to the end of the sequence by jumping them over the desired unitaries ( or moved to the beginning if we consider the language of @xmath8 ) and then we use the composition rules ( [ comp - err])([comp - err - fid2 ] ) . the procedure further simplifies if we can neglect `` coherent '' errors and use the simple additive rule ( [ comp - err-2 ] ) for all elements ( except @xmath241 ) . in experiments it is often useful to check how large the inaccuracy is of the unitary part of a realized quantum gate and find the necessary unitary corrections to improve fidelity of the gate . the error matrix @xmath7 ( or @xmath8 ) gives us a simple way to do this , because small unitary imperfections directly show up as the imaginary parts of the elements @xmath152 and @xmath177 . let us assume that we apply a small unitary correction @xmath242 after an operation characterized by the desired @xmath6 and error matrix @xmath7 with fidelity @xmath9 . then the process matrix @xmath243 for the correction operation mainly consists of the element @xmath244 and the imaginary first - order elements @xmath245 [ see eq . ( [ imag - unitary ] ) ] , while all other elements are of second order . using eq . ( [ comp - diag ] ) we see that after the correction the elements in the left column of the error matrix approximately change as _ n0^err _ n0^err + f_u_n^corr , [ corr - change]so to correct the unitary imperfection we need to choose u_n^corr - i i m ( _ n0^err)/f _ , [ corr - unitary]which cancels the imaginary part of the left - column elements ( here the factor @xmath246 needs an implicit assumption that the infidelity is dominated by decoherence ) . the increase of the gate fidelity @xmath247 due to this correction procedure can be estimated using eq . ( [ comp - err - fid2 ] ) , f__n0 ( im^ err_n0)^2/f_. [ delta - f]in this derivation the factor of 2 in the second term of eq.([comp - err - fid2 ] ) is compensated by the fidelity decrease due to the first term . the result ( [ delta - f ] ) in the case @xmath248 coincides with what we would expect from the unitary correction in absence of decoherence . the factor @xmath246 in eq . ( [ delta - f ] ) implicitly assumes that the infidelity is dominated by decoherence . note that the fidelity increase @xmath247 is of second order , so in an experiment we should not expect a significant improvement of fidelity due to unitary correction , unless the unitary imperfection is quite big . also note that in an experiment it may be easy to apply a unitary correction only in some `` directions '' , for example , by applying single - qubit pulses , while other corrections may be very difficult . in this case only some of the elements @xmath94 can be compensated , and then the fidelity improvement is given by eq . ( [ delta - f ] ) , in which summation is only over the elements , compensated by the correction procedure . the above analysis of the compensation procedure assumes a small compensation . if the unitary error is large , then to find the optimal correction @xmath249 we can use an iterative procedure , in which we first estimate the correction via eq.([corr - unitary ] ) , then use the exact composition relation ( [ comp - gen ] ) , and then again adjust the correction via eq.([corr - unitary ] ) . our analysis of the unitary compensation procedure assumed application of @xmath249 after the quantum gate . if the compensation is applied before the quantum gate , then it is more natural to use the language of @xmath8 ( see fig . 1 ) ; in this case eqs . ( [ corr - change])([delta - f ] ) remain valid , with @xmath7 replaced by @xmath8 . applying corrections both before and after the gate may in some cases increase the number of correctable `` directions '' in the space of unitary operators . to illustrate analysis of the unitary corrections , let us consider the two - qubit controlled - z ( cz ) gate in the `` quantum von neumann architecture '' @xcite , in which single - qubit @xmath41-rotations are realizable very easily ( without an additional cost ) , and so such corrections can be easily applied . application of @xmath41-rotation over the small angle @xmath250 to the first qubit and @xmath41-rotation over the small angle @xmath251 to the second qubit produces the correction unitary @xmath252 in the basis @xmath253 . here @xmath254 , but if we can also introduce correction @xmath255 of the cz angle , then it will be @xmath256 . expansion of @xmath249 in the pauli basis gives four non - zero elements : @xmath257 where we used the standard notation for the two - qubit operator basis @xmath258 ; note that the index 0 in the notations of our paper corresponds to @xmath259 . it is important to emphasize that this expansion of @xmath249 is not exactly what we used in eqs.([corr - change ] ) and ( [ corr - unitary ] ) because we assumed real @xmath260 , while @xmath261 in eq.([u - corr - ii ] ) is not real . we therefore need to adjust the overall phase of @xmath249 to make @xmath261 real . this can be easily done by replacing @xmath249 with @xmath262 . however , for small angles @xmath263 this would produce only a small change in eqs.([u - corr - iz])([u - corr - zz ] ) . the left column of @xmath264 therefore contains the same non - zero elements , @xmath265 if we correct only @xmath250 and @xmath251 ( so that @xmath266 ) , then we should choose them [ see eq.([corr - unitary ] ) ] as _ 1 2 i m ( ^err_iz , ii)/f _ , _ 2 2 i m ( ^err_zi , ii)/f _ , [ correct - phi12]where @xmath7 and @xmath267 are measured experimentally . this will cancel the left - column elements @xmath268 and @xmath269 in the corrected quantum gate and produce fidelity improvement @xmath270/f_\chi $ ] . if we can also correct @xmath255 , then we should choose corrections @xmath271 this will cancel the left - column elements @xmath272 , @xmath273 , and @xmath274 in the corrected quantum gate and produce fidelity improvement @xmath275/f_\chi $ ] . note that @xmath249 commutes with the cz gate , @xmath276 , so it does not matter if the single - qubit corrections are applied before or after the gate ( the @xmath255 correction is obviously a correction of the gate itself ) . similarly , it does not matter if we use @xmath7 or @xmath8 in this correction procedure . let us consider a quantum evolution described by the lindblad - form master equation = - [ h , ] + _ j _ j ( b_j b_j^- b^_jb_j -b^_jb_j ) , [ lindblad - evol]where @xmath277 is the hamiltonian ( which has a significant time dependence for a multi - stage quantum gate ) and @xmath278th decoherence mechanism is described by the kraus operator @xmath279 and the rate @xmath280 . mathematically it is natural to work with the combination @xmath281 ; however , we prefer to keep @xmath282 and @xmath279 separate because they both have clear physical meanings ( see appendix b ) . the imperfection of a quantum gate comes from imperfect control of the hamiltonian @xmath277 and from decoherence . if both imperfections are small , we can consider them separately . so , in this section we assume perfect @xmath277 and analyze the process error matrix due to decoherence only . moreover , we will consider only one decoherence mechanism , since summation over them is simple and can be done later . therefore we will drop the index @xmath278 in eq.([lindblad - evol ] ) and characterize the decoherence process by @xmath283 and @xmath284 . to find the error matrix @xmath7 ( or @xmath8 ) of such operation , we can divide the total gate duration @xmath285 into small timesteps @xmath286 , for each of them representing the evolution as the desired unitary @xmath287 $ ] and the error process @xmath288 . then using the same idea as in section [ sec - comp ] , we can jump the error processes over the unitaries , moving them to the very end ( for @xmath7 ) or to the very beginning of the gate ( for @xmath8 ) . finally , we can add up the error processes for all @xmath286 using approximations ( [ comp - err])([comp - err - fid2 ] ) . for small @xmath286 the error matrix @xmath289 can be found by expanding @xmath283 and @xmath290 in the pauli basis , @xmath291 , @xmath292 , and then comparing the decoherence terms in eq.([lindblad - evol ] ) with eq . ( [ chi - def ] ) , @xmath293 it is easy to see that @xmath294 since @xmath24 for the pauli basis , so the left - column and top - row contributions due to the @xmath295-terms in eq . ( [ b - mn ] ) are real . note that we can always use the transformation @xmath296 in the lindblad equation , which compensates ( zeroes ) the component @xmath297 but changes the hamiltonian , @xmath298 with @xmath299 ( there is no change , @xmath300 , if @xmath283 is hermitian ) . therefore we can use @xmath301 in eq . ( [ b - mn ] ) , and then the left - column and top - row elements come only from the @xmath295-terms , which correspond to the the terms @xmath302 of the lindblad equation and so correspond to the `` no - jump '' evolution ( see appendix b ) . thus we have a clear physical picture of where the components of @xmath303 come from : the imaginary parts of the left - column and top - row elements come from the unitary imperfection ( which may also be related to the decoherence - induced change of the hamiltonian ) , the real parts of the left - column and top - row elements come from the `` no - jump '' evolution ( see appendix b ) , and other elements come from the decoherence `` jumps '' , which `` strongly '' change the state ( recall that @xmath283 have only components orthogonal to @xmath139 ) . a similar interpretation has been used in sec . [ sec - properties ] . note that @xmath304 for small @xmath286 because there is practically no unitary evolution . now let us use the language of @xmath8 , which relates the error process to the beginning of the gate ( @xmath305 ) . we can find @xmath8 by moving the error processes @xmath306 to the start of the gate using the transformation relation ( [ chi-2-u1 ] ) and then summing up the error contributions using the approximate additive rule ( [ comp - err - matrix ] ) . in this way we obtain @xmath307 , \\ & & u(t)=\exp [ \frac{-i}{\hbar } \int_0^t h(t)\ , dt ] , \label{u(t ) } \end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath308 is given by eq . ( [ b - mn ] ) , @xmath309 is the unitary evolution occurring within the interval @xmath310 , and eq.([u(t ) ] ) assumes the time - ordering of operators . similar procedure can be used to find @xmath7 ; then we should move the errors to the end of the gate , by jumping them over the remaining unitary @xmath311 , @xmath312 . \qquad \label{lindblad - w}\end{aligned}\ ] ] note that the @xmath313-transformation of @xmath308 in eq.([lindblad - chi - err ] ) , @xmath314 , is equivalent to the @xmath315-transformation of the kraus operator @xmath283 , which relates it to the end of the gate , b(t)=u_rem(t ) b u_rem^ ( t ) . [ b(t ) ] therefore instead of eq . ( [ lindblad - chi - err ] ) we can use ^err^*i*+(t ) dt , [ lindblad - chi - err-2]in which @xmath316 is given by eqs . ( [ b - mn])([c - n ] ) using @xmath317 instead of @xmath283 . similarly , instead of eq . ( [ lindblad - chi - err - tilde ] ) we can use ^err^*i*+(t ) dt , in which @xmath318 is given by eqs.([b - mn])([c - n ] ) with ( t)u^(t ) b u(t ) [ tilde - b ] instead of @xmath283 . note that if @xmath283 is orthogonal to @xmath139 ( @xmath301 , see discussion above ) , then @xmath317 and @xmath319 are also orthogonal to @xmath139 , so they still describe `` strong '' error jumps . since the element @xmath320 does not change in the transformation @xmath321 , in the approximation ( [ lindblad - chi - err ] ) the fidelity is f _ 1-_0^t_g _ n0 |b_n|^2 dt , [ lindblad - f]so that if @xmath322 does not depend on time , then @xmath323 decays linearly with the gate time @xmath285 . ( as discussed above , the element @xmath297 is equivalent to a unitary imperfection , and therefore brings infidelity , which scales quadratically with time . ) an interesting observation is that in this approximation the fidelity does not depend on the desired unitary evolution @xmath309 . therefore , for example , for _ any two - qubit gate _ ( which does not involve higher physical levels in the qubits ) the contribution to the infidelity due to the energy relaxation and ( markovian non - correlated ) pure dephasing of the qubits is 1-f_= + + + , [ lindbad - t1-t2]where @xmath324 is the energy relaxation time , @xmath325 is the pure dephasing time , and the qubits are labeled by superscripts @xmath326 and @xmath327 ( see appendix a ) . the independence of the fidelity ( [ lindblad - f ] ) on the unitary evolution can be understood in the following way . the process fidelity @xmath9 is related to the state fidelity , uniformly averaged over all pure initial states . a unitary evolution does not change the uniform distribution of pure states ; therefore , the average rate of rare `` decoherence jumps '' does not depend on the unitary part . the approximation ( [ lindblad - chi - err - tilde])([lindblad - f ] ) neglects the second - order corrections . in the case of significant coherent errors ( which is not typical when only lindblad - equation decoherence is discussed ) , the natural second - order correction is to add @xmath328 to the elements @xmath329 with @xmath164 and @xmath59 ( we assume @xmath330 ) . since this correction is small , it may be important only for the diagonal elements @xmath80 , because it affects the resulting fidelity @xmath331 . this will introduce correction into eq.([lindblad - f ] ) , which scales quadratically with the gate time @xmath285 . the similar second - order correction @xmath332 can be introduced to the elements of @xmath333 . note that in eqs . ( [ lindblad - chi - err ] ) and ( [ lindblad - chi - err-2 ] ) the elements of @xmath7 are linear in the decoherence rate @xmath322 . therefore the `` pattern '' of @xmath7 elements is determined by the decoherence mechanism characterized by the operator @xmath308 and its transformation @xmath334 , and this pattern is multiplied by the decoherence rate @xmath322 . ( the experimental @xmath151 may need subtraction of the discussed above second - order correction to become linear in @xmath322 . ) if there are several decoherence mechanisms in eq.([lindblad - evol ] ) , then in the first order their contributions to @xmath7 simply add up . therefore , if the patterns for the different decoherence mechanisms @xmath279 are sufficiently simple and distinguishable from each other , then the decoherence rates @xmath282 can be found directly from the experimentally measured @xmath7 ( again , subtraction of the second - order correction may be useful in the case of significant coherent errors ) . a very important difficulty in experimental implementation of the qpt is due to spam errors : imperfect preparation of the initial states and state tomography errors , which include imperfect tomographic single - qubit rotations and imperfect measurement of qubits . in this section we discuss a way , which may help solving this problem . first , let us assume that the imperfect state preparation can be represented as an error channel , which acts on the ideal initial state . if we use @xmath2 initial states of @xmath1 qubits , then the transformation between @xmath2 ideal and real density matrices of the initial states can always be described by a linear transformation , characterized by @xmath33 parameters . so by the number of parameters it seems that the representation of the preparation error by an error channel is always possible . the problem , however , is that this transformation may happen to be non - positive . also , if more than @xmath2 initial states are used in an experiment , then an error - channel representation may be impossible by the number of parameters . nevertheless , we will use this representation , arguing that it can somehow be introduced phenomenologically . similarly , we assume that the imperfections of the tomographic single - qubit rotations and measurement can also be represented as an error channel . and @xmath335 . , width=302 ] using these two assumptions , we describe the preparation errors by the error matrix @xmath335 ( which is close to the ideal memory @xmath234 ) , and the tomography / measurement errors are described by @xmath336 ( also close to @xmath234 ) see fig . thus the experimentally measured error matrix @xmath337 is due to @xmath335 , @xmath7 ( which we need to find ) and @xmath336 . the general idea is to measure @xmath335 and @xmath336 by doing the process tomography without the gate ( doing the tomography immediately on the initial states ) and then subtract this spam error from @xmath338 to obtain @xmath7 . so , the procedure which first comes to mind is to use @xmath339 , where @xmath340 is the experimentally measured @xmath0 without the gate . however , in general this would be wrong . the reason is that without the gate we measure the simple sum of the spam - error components [ see eq.([comp - err - matrix ] ) ] , ^err , i^prep+ ^meas -^*i * , but in the presence of the gate @xmath6 the preparation error @xmath341 changes because it is `` jumped over '' @xmath6 [ see sec.[sec - comp ] and eq . ( [ chi - err - jump ] ) ] , so that ^err , exp ^err + w_(u)(^prep -^*i*)w_(u)^+ ( ^meas -^*i * ) , [ spam - exp]where @xmath196 is given by eq . ( [ w - def ] ) . therefore to find the actual error matrix @xmath7 from the experimental @xmath338 , it is insufficient to know @xmath342 . we can still find @xmath7 from eq.([spam - exp ] ) , but we need to know @xmath335 and @xmath336 separately . the idea how to find both @xmath335 and @xmath336 is to do a calibration qpt with a set of gates with very high fidelity , for which the error is negligible , and then use eq . ( [ spam - exp ] ) to separate the changing contribution from @xmath335 and non - changing contribution from @xmath343 . for example , in experiments with superconducting qubits the one - qubit @xmath344 and @xmath345 rotations about @xmath346 and @xmath21 axes usually have much better fidelity than two - qubit or multi - qubit gates . therefore , for the qpt of a two - qubit or multi - qubit gate we can rely on the spam - error identification using these one - qubit gates . let us start with considering a single qubit and discussing the change @xmath347 of the preparation error contribution , when we apply a high - fidelity @xmath346 gate , @xmath348 . by using eq . ( [ spam - exp ] ) or by simply comparing the terms in the equation @xmath349 , it is easy to find that this transformation flips the signs of the off - diagonal elements @xmath350 , @xmath351 , @xmath352 , and @xmath353 of @xmath341 ( the same for the symmetric , complex - conjugate elements ) , while the off - diagonal elements @xmath354 and @xmath355 ( and symmetric elements ) do not change . the diagonal elements do not change , as expected for a pauli twirling . similarly , if we apply the high - fidelity @xmath21 gate , then the off - diagonal elements @xmath354 , @xmath351 , @xmath352 , and @xmath355 flip the sign , while the elements @xmath350 and @xmath353 do not change . recall that the contribution from @xmath336 does not change . therefore , by comparing @xmath338 for the gates @xmath346 , @xmath21 , and @xmath356 ( no gate ) , we can find separately all the off - diagonal elements of @xmath335 and @xmath336 . to find diagonal elements of @xmath335 and @xmath336 , we can use high - fidelity gates @xmath357 ( @xmath345 rotation over @xmath346 axis ) and @xmath358 ( @xmath345 rotation over @xmath21 axis ) . the gate @xmath357 exchanges diagonal elements @xmath359 and @xmath360 of @xmath335 ( it also exchanges and flips signs of some off - diagonal elements , but for simplicity we focus on the diagonal elements only ) . similarly , the operation @xmath358 exchanges the elements @xmath361 and @xmath360 of @xmath335 . since the elements of @xmath336 do not change , we can find the diagonal elements of @xmath335 and @xmath336 separately . actually , this can not be done in the unique way , because the contributions proportional to @xmath139 in @xmath362 and in @xmath363 are indistinguishable from each other ( these are the depolarization - channel contributions ) . however , this non - uniqueness is not important because any choice gives the same spam - error contribution to @xmath338 . in this way , by doing qpt of the gates @xmath346 , @xmath21 , @xmath357 , @xmath358 and @xmath356 for a single qubit , we can find @xmath335 and @xmath336 ( assuming that these gate are nearly perfect in comparison with preparation and measurement errors ) . for two or more qubits we can do the similar procedure , applying the combinations of these 5 single - qubit gates , and thus identifying all the elements of the multi - qubit matrices @xmath335 and @xmath336 . in fact , the system of equations for this identification is overdetermined , so we can either use an ad - hoc way of calculating the elements or use the numerically efficient least - square method ( via the pseudo - inverse ) . note that the described procedure has an obvious relation to the pauli and clifford twirling , but for us it is sufficient to use only a small subset of operations , and we do not average the result . the described procedure of the spam - error identification [ which is then subtracted from @xmath338 using eq.([spam - exp ] ) ] is surely very cumbersome . however , this is at least some way to deal with the spam problem , which does not seem to have a simple solution . moreover , there are several ways to make experimental procedure less cumbersome , which are discussed next . the situation is greatly simplified if the spam - error is dominated by only one component : either @xmath335 or @xmath336 . if @xmath335 is negligible , then from eq . ( [ spam - exp ] ) we see that the error matrix of the analyzed multi - qubit gate @xmath6 can be estimated as ^err^err , exp-(^err , i-^*i * ) , so besides the standard qpt of the @xmath6 gate we only need the qpt of no operation ( @xmath356 gate ) . in the opposite limit when @xmath343 is negligible , it is easier to use the language of @xmath364 , because we can neglect the change of @xmath336 when it is jumped over @xmath6 to the left . in this case ^err^err , exp-(^err , i-^*i * ) ; recall that @xmath365 . when both @xmath335 and @xmath336 are significant in the spam - error , it is still possible to simplify the described above procedure by using the idea of compressed - sensing qpt @xcite . in contrast to the usual application of the compressed - sensing idea to the qpt of the gate @xmath6 , we can apply it to find @xmath335 and @xmath343 by using a small random subset of @xmath366 combinations of single - qubit gates in the procedure . it is also possible to combine the random choice of the gates with the random choice of initial states and measurement directions , thus further reducing the amount of experimental work . it is important to emphasize that we do not need to know the matrices @xmath335 and @xmath336 very precisely , so their compressed - sensing estimate should be sufficient . one more idea , which may be practically useful , is to measure @xmath367 and select only few significant peaks in it . for each of these peaks we identify which contribution to it comes from @xmath368 and from @xmath336 by applying just one or a few single - qubit rotations , which change this particular peak . it is beneficial to choose the rotations , which affect more than one significant peak of @xmath367 . in this way a relatively small number of qpts is sufficient to find the significant peaks of @xmath335 and @xmath336 . then by using eq . ( [ spam - exp ] ) we estimate the spam contribution for the multi - qubit gate @xmath6 and subtract it from the experimental error matrix @xmath338 to find `` actual '' @xmath7 . note that we do not need a complicated procedure to find the `` actual '' process fidelity @xmath9 of the gate @xmath6 . if the spam errors can be represented by the error channels ( fig . 3 ) and if there are no significant coherent spam errors , then f_f_^exp / f_^i , [ spam - fid]where @xmath369 and @xmath370 are the experimentally measured fidelities for the gate @xmath6 and no gate , respectively [ see eq . ( [ comp - err - fid2 ] ) ] . in this paper we have discussed representation of quantum operations via the error matrices . instead of characterizing an operation by the standard process matrix @xmath0 , we separate the desired unitary operation @xmath6 and the error process , which is placed either after or before @xmath6 ( fig . 1 ) . this defines two error matrices : @xmath7 and @xmath8 [ eqs.([chi - err - def ] ) and ( [ tilde - chi - err - def ] ) ] . we use the standard pauli basis @xmath197 for all process matrices . the error matrices @xmath7 and @xmath8 are related to @xmath0 via unitary transformations [ eqs . ( [ chi - err - chi ] ) and ( [ chi - tilde - err - chi ] ) ] , as well as to each other [ eqs.([w - transf ] ) and ( [ w - def ] ) ] . therefore the error matrices are equivalent to @xmath0 ; however , they are more convenient to use than @xmath0 . the error matrices have only one large element , which is located at the top left corner and is equal to the process fidelity @xmath9 . any other non - zero element corresponds to an imperfection of the quantum gate . therefore , the bar chart of @xmath7 ( or @xmath8 ) is a visually convenient way of representing the imperfections of an experimental quantum gate . the elements of @xmath7 ( or @xmath8 ) have more intuitive physical meaning related to the operation imperfection , than the elements of @xmath0 ( even though the meaning of most of the elements is still not as intuitive as we would wish ) . it is important that since the error - matrix elements are small for a high - fidelity gate , the first - order approximation is typically sufficient . the imaginary parts of the elements in the left column and top row correspond to the unitary imperfection , @xmath371 where the correction factor @xmath372 can be taken seriously only if most of infidelity comes from decoherence . the real parts of the elements in the left column and top row correspond to the small non - unitary change of the quantum state in the case when no `` jumps '' due to decoherence occur ( this change is due to the bayesian update , see appendix b ) . it is natural to combine this non - unitary change with the unitary imperfection into a `` coherent '' ( or `` gradual '' ) state change , which happens in absence of `` jumps '' . finally , other elements of @xmath329 , with @xmath164 and @xmath59 , correspond to the strong `` jumps '' of the quantum state due to decoherence . these jumps are characterized by kraus operators practically orthogonal to @xmath139 and therefore always bring an error ( see discussions in secs.[sec - properties ] and [ sec - lindblad - error ] ) . the diagonal elements @xmath373 with @xmath59 ( probabilities of @xmath13-type errors in the pauli twirling approximation @xcite ) have contributions from both the `` coherent '' imperfection and decoherence `` jump '' processes ; however , the `` coherent '' contribution to @xmath373 is of second order ( crudely , @xmath374 or @xmath375 ) , so typically the main contribution is expected to be from decoherence , unless the unitary part is very inaccurate . we mainly discuss @xmath7 , but everything is practically the same in the language of @xmath8 . the composition of two error processes in the absence of desired unitary operations can be represented in the first order as a simple addition of the corresponding error matrices [ eqs.([comp - err])([comp - err - matrix ] ) ] . however , if for @xmath376 sequential error processes the `` coherent '' elements @xmath377 add up with the same phases and thus the sum grows linearly with @xmath376 , then the second - order contribution ( in particular , to the diagonal elements @xmath373 ) grows as @xmath378 , and for large @xmath376 it can become significant in comparison with the first - order decoherence contribution , which grows linearly with @xmath376 . for a composition of two quantum gates with non - trivial desired unitaries we need first to `` jump '' the error process over the unitary ( see fig . 2 ) , that is described by the transformation ( [ chi - err - jump ] ) , and then add the error matrices . essentially the same procedure can be done to calculate the error matrix contribution due to the lindblad - form decoherence in a quantum gate , which has finite duration and non - trivial evolution in time . for each short time step @xmath286 the decoherence produces a contribution to @xmath7 [ eq . ( [ chi - err - b - mn ] ) ] , but this contribution should be `` jumped over '' the unitary evolution to the beginning or the end of the gate before being summed up [ eqs.([lindblad - chi - err - tilde ] ) and ( [ lindblad - chi - err ] ) ] . the equivalent language is to `` jump '' the decoherence kraus operators over the desired unitaries , before the summation of error matrices [ eqs . ( [ b(t)])([tilde - b ] ) ] . it is interesting that in the leading order the contribution to the infidelity @xmath97 from the decoherence ( if it occurs within the same hilbert space ) does not depend on the desired unitary evolution [ eqs . ( [ lindblad - f ] ) and ( [ lindbad - t1-t2 ] ) ] . since the elements @xmath94 directly tell us about the unitary imperfection , it is easy to find the needed unitary correction [ eq . ( [ corr - unitary ] ) ] and the corresponding fidelity improvement [ eq . ( [ delta - f ] ) ] . however , the fidelity improvement is of second order and therefore is typically not expected to be significant . we have considered a particular example of correcting a cz gate using single - qubit @xmath41-rotations and cz - phase corrections [ eqs.([correct - phi12])([correct - czphase ] ) ] . the qpt suffers from errors in preparing the initial states and tomography measurement ( spam errors ) . while this problem does not seem to have a simple solution , in sec . [ sec - spam ] we have discussed a way , which may be helpful in alleviating this problem . a natural idea is to measure the error matrix @xmath367 in the absence of the gate and then subtract it from the measured error matrix @xmath338 of the characterized gate @xmath6 . however , this idea works only if the spam is dominated by one type of error : either at the preparation or at the tomography measurement . in general we need to know the contributions @xmath335 and @xmath336 from both errors separately because their addition depends on the gate @xmath6 [ eq . ( [ spam - exp ] ) ] . this can be done if some high - fidelity single - qubit gates are available ; then analyzing the change of @xmath338 with application of different high - fidelity gates , we can separate the contributions from @xmath335 and @xmath336 . note that this method assumes that the spam - errors can be represented as error processes at the preparation and tomography stages ; the accuracy of this assumption is questionable . one of the ways to check this assumption is to check one of its predictions : eq . ( [ spam - fid ] ) says that the `` actual '' fidelity of a quantum gate is the ratio of its qpt - measured fidelity and fidelity of the no - gate operation . the gate fidelity calculated in this way can then be compared with the fidelity obtained from the randomized benchmarking . the appendices of this paper are to a significant extent separated from the main text . in appendix a we consider several simple examples of @xmath0-matrices for unitary evolution and decoherence , including the energy relaxation and pure dephasing ( markovian and non - markovian ) . in appendix b we discuss unraveling of the lindblad - form evolution into the `` jump '' and `` no - jump '' scenarios , which can bring useful intuition in the analysis of decoherence ; several examples are considered to illustrate the technique . reiterating the main point of this paper , we think that characterization of quantum gates by error matrices in the pauli basis is a convenient way of presenting experimental qpt results . the author thanks yuri bogdanov , abraham kofman , justin dressel , andrzej veitia , jay gambetta , michael geller , and john martinis for useful discussions . the research was funded by the office of the director of national intelligence ( odni ) , intelligence advanced research projects activity ( iarpa ) , through the army research office grant no . w911nf-10 - 1 - 0334 . all statements of fact , opinion , or conclusions contained herein are those of the authors and should not be construed as representing the official views or policies of iarpa , the odni , or the u.s . government . we also acknowledge support from the aro muri grant no . w911nf-11 - 1 - 0268 . in this appendix we consider several simple examples of the quantum processes , for which we calculate the standard process matrix @xmath0 of the qpt . the matrix @xmath0 is defined via eq . ( [ chi - def ] ) , which is copied here for convenience , _ _ mn e_m _ ine_n^. [ chi - def-2]for the operator basis @xmath19 we use the pauli basis , so that for one qubit it consists of four pauli matrices , @xmath379 while for several qubits the kronecker ( direct , outer , tensor ) product of these matrices is used . we use the notation @xcite in which @xmath380 . as a very simple example , let us calculate the matrix @xmath0 for a @xmath41-rotation of a qubit over the angle @xmath381 . this realizes the unitary operator @xmath6 , which acts as @xmath382 , we have in general @xmath383 . let us represent @xmath6 in the pauli basis , u = ( cc 1&0 + 0&e^i ) = e^i/2 ( ( ) i -i ( ) z ) , [ u - z]where the unimportant overall phase factor @xmath384 does not affect the density matrix evolution , so that _ fin = [ ( ) i -i ( ) z ] _ in [ ( ) i + i ( ) z ] [ rho - for - z](note that the pauli matrices are herimitian , so we do not need to conjugate them ) . now by comparing eq . ( [ rho - for - z ] ) with eq . ( [ chi - def-2 ] ) we immediately find @xmath385 other elements are zero . it is easy to see that the method of finding @xmath0 by comparing eq . ( [ rho - for - z ] ) with eq.([chi - def-2 ] ) is equivalent to using eq . ( [ chi - u ] ) . in a similar way we can calculate the matrix @xmath0 for a one - qubit @xmath346-rotation over angle @xmath381 . the result is obviously the same as eqs . ( [ chi - z-1])([chi - z-2 ] ) , with index @xmath41 replaced by @xmath346 : @xmath386 , @xmath387 , @xmath388 . similarly , for @xmath21-rotations we replace @xmath41 in eqs.([chi - z-1])([chi - z-2 ] ) with @xmath21 . a qubit rotation about an axis @xmath389 on the bloch sphere over an angle @xmath381 corresponds to the unitary operator @xcite u== ( ) i - i ( ) ( ) , where @xmath390 . note that this formula neglects the overall phase factor ( which does not exist in the bloch - sphere space ) , as seen by comparing it with eq . ( [ u - z ] ) . using eq . ( [ chi - u ] ) or , alternatively , comparing equation @xmath383 with the definition ( [ chi - def-2 ] ) , we still can easily find the elements of the @xmath0-matrix ; now all 16 elements are in general non - zero , though they are determined by only 3 real parameters . let us start with the case when the first qubit is @xmath41-rotated over the angle @xmath381 , while the second qubit is `` idling '' . then the unitary operator is @xmath391 \otimes i$ ] , and eq . ( [ rho - for - z ] ) becomes _ fin = [ ( i -i z)i ] _ in [ ( i + i z)i ] , [ rho - for - z-2]where for brevity we omit the argument @xmath392 of sines and cosines . comparing this equation with ( [ chi - def-2 ] ) , we have to use double - letter combinations for both indices @xmath393 and @xmath184 ; however , we see that the second - qubit letter is always @xmath356 , so we essentially obtain the single - qubit result ( [ chi - z-1])([chi - z-2 ] ) with added index @xmath356 for the second qubit : @xmath394 as another example , let us consider the controlled - phase operation ( note that our use of the name `` controlled - phase '' is different from the terminology of ref . @xcite ) , @xmath395 where in this ( rather sloppy ) notation we omit the kronecker product sign `` @xmath396 '' . by comparing @xmath397 with ( [ chi - def-2 ] ) we obtain 16 non - zero elements : @xmath398 the controlled - phase gate becomes the cz gate at @xmath399 . then @xmath400 , and all 16 elements of @xmath0 in eqs.([c - p-1])([c - p-5 ] ) become @xmath401 . note that if in an experimental realization the phase @xmath402 fluctuates symmetrically around @xmath344 with a small variance @xmath403 , then the element @xmath404 increases by @xmath405 , while other 15 elements decrease in absolute value by @xmath406 . for the perfect cnot gate ( with the first qubit being the control ) the unitary can be represented as u = i + x , [ u - cnot]where we used the relations @xmath407 and @xmath408 ( here we again use the notation `` @xmath396 '' for more clarity ) . then non - zero elements of @xmath0 are @xmath409 as directly follows from the combinations of 4 terms in eq.([u - cnot ] ) . for the perfect @xmath42 gate the unitary is @xmath410 so the non - zero elements of the matrix @xmath0 are given by the pairwise products of these 4 terms , @xmath411 it is very easy to find the matrix @xmath0 for one qubit with pure dephasing ( assuming no other evolution ) . after waiting for time @xmath412 , the qubit is @xmath41-rotated over a random angle @xmath381 . from the definition @xmath413 we see that for a random evolution we simply need to average the @xmath0-matrix over the possible evolution realizations . therefore the @xmath0-matrix for pure dephasing is given by averaging eqs . ( [ chi - z-1])([chi - z-2 ] ) : @xmath414 where @xmath415 denotes averaging over realizations . for a symmetric probability density distribution of @xmath381 we get @xmath416 and therefore @xmath417 , so the only non - zero elements are @xmath418 and @xmath419 . it is important to emphasize that the result ( [ deph-1 ] ) does not assume exponential dephasing ; it remains valid for an `` inhomogeneous '' contribution to the dephasing ( slightly different qubit frequencies in different experimental runs ) and/or the `` 1/f '' contribution ( when the qubit frequency fluctuation has a broad range of timescales ) . it is also important that the value @xmath420 which determines @xmath419 can be directly obtained from the ramsey - fringes data . let us consider the ramsey protocol : start with @xmath421 , apply @xmath345 @xmath346-rotation , wait time @xmath412 , apply the second @xmath345 rotation about the axis , which is shifted from @xmath346 by an angle @xmath422 in the equatorial plane of the bloch sphere , and finally measure the probability @xmath423 of the state @xmath424 . it is easy to find that for a pure dephasing ( including non - exponential case ) p(|1 ) = + = + , where for the second equation we assumed @xmath425 . in the case of exponential dephasing characterized by the dephasing time @xmath325 , we have @xmath426 . in the general case the time dependence of @xmath427 is arbitrary ; however , it can be found experimentally from the amplitude of the ramsey oscillations and then can be used in eq . ( [ deph-1 ] ) to obtain @xmath419 . it is important to mention that experimentally @xmath325 is often defined as the time at which @xmath428 . if the qubit dephasing is due to fast ( `` white noise '' ) fluctuations of the qubit energy , then @xmath429 and correspondingly @xmath430 , so that at short time , @xmath431 , there is a linear dependence , _ zzt/2t_. however , if the pure dephasing is dominated by the very slow fluctuations of the qubit energy , then @xmath432 $ ] and the ramsey - fringes dependence has a gaussian shape . in this case at @xmath433 the dephasing error is quadratic in time , _ zzt^2/2t_^2 . in the presence of both mechanisms = ( -t / t _ , fast ) ; this formula can also be used as an approximation in the case of a broad range of the fluctuation timesclales . the corresponding @xmath419 is still given by eq . ( [ deph-1 ] ) . note that in the presence of energy relaxation ( discussed later ) the value of @xmath427 can still be directly extracted from the ramsey - fringes data see eq.([ramsey - t1-deph ] ) below . now let us calculate the matrix @xmath0 taking into account the qubit energy relaxation , but assuming the absence of pure dephasing . let us start with the zero - temperature case ( relaxation to the state @xmath421 only ) . using `` unraveling '' of the energy relaxation in the same way as in refs . @xcite and @xcite ( see also appendix b ) , we may think about two probabilistic scenarios : |0+|1\ { c |0 with prob . p_r=||^2 ( 1-e^-t / t_1 ) + with prob . ( in the case of no relaxation the state evolves due to the bayesian update ) . this corresponds to the technique of kraus operators and for the density matrix gives _ in a_r _ in a_r^+ a_no _ in a_no^ , [ rel - kraus - eq]where the kraus operators @xmath434 ( for the scenario with relaxation ) and @xmath435 ( for the scenario with no relaxation ) are a_r =( cc0 & + 0 & 0 ) , a_no =( cc 1 & 0 + 0 & e^-t/2t_1 ) . note that @xmath436 ( the completeness relation ) . here we use the standard kraus - operator representation @xcite , in contrast to the somewhat modified representation ( [ kraus - representation ] ) . to find the @xmath0-matrix , we expand the kraus operators in the pauli basis , @xmath437 now comparing evolution ( [ rel - kraus - eq ] ) with the form ( [ chi - def-2 ] ) , we collect the @xmath0-matrix elements ( the relaxation term brings elements involving @xmath346 and @xmath21 , while the no - relaxation term brings elements with @xmath356 and @xmath41 ) : @xmath438 note that at small @xmath439 the element @xmath419 is quadratic in time ( very small ) , while other elements ( except @xmath418 ) are linear in time ( in this case @xmath440 , as expected from the discussion in sec . [ sec - properties ] ) . also note that the non - zero elements in the left column and top row ( @xmath441 and @xmath442 ) are real and come from the no - relaxation scenario ( see sec . [ sec - properties ] ) . for a non - zero temperature there are two kinds of the relaxation processes ( up and down ) with the rates @xmath443 and @xmath444 satisfying the standard relations @xmath445 and @xmath446 , where @xmath98 is temperature and @xmath447 is the energy difference between the qubit states ; this gives @xmath448 . correspondingly , there are three scenarios with the kraus operators @xmath449 then in a similar way as above we find the @xmath0-matrix elements : @xmath450 phase evolution commutes with the energy relaxation , therefore we may apply @xmath41-rotation over a random angle @xmath381 after the energy relaxation . the @xmath41-rotation does not affect scenario(s ) with relaxation , so we need to change only the kraus operator for the no - relaxation scenario : @xmath451 , then calculate the corresponding elements of the @xmath0-matrix in the same way as above and average over @xmath381 . therefore , the elements @xmath452 , @xmath453 , @xmath454 , @xmath455 due to energy relaxation will not be affected by the pure dephasing ( since they come from the relaxation scenario ) . the calculation shows that the elements @xmath441 and @xmath442 are also not affected when @xmath456 ( satisfied for a symmetric noise ) , so the only affected elements are @xmath419 and @xmath418 , which are non - zero for both decoherence mechanisms . using again the condition @xmath457 , it is easy to find @xmath458 where @xmath459 and @xmath460 correspond to pure dephasing and energy relaxation , and were calculated above [ eqs.([deph-1 ] ) and ( [ rel - temp-1])([rel - temp-5 ] ) ] . for completeness let us also show the unaffected elements : @xmath461 another way of deriving eqs.([deph+rel - zz])([deph+rel - iz ] ) is the following . let us apply pure dephasing after energy relaxation and write the composition of quantum operations as _ m , n _ mn _ mn^rel _ mn^deph e_m e_m _ ine_n^e_n^. [ chi - composition]even though a product of pauli matrices is a pauli matrix ( possibly with a phase factor ) and therefore @xmath0-matrix of a composition of operations can in principle be calculated in a straightforward way , usually this is a very cumbersome procedure . however , in our case the matrix @xmath459 has only two non - zero elements ( @xmath462 and @xmath463 ) , so the calculation is not very long and leads to eqs.([deph+rel - zz])([deph+rel - iz ] ) . now when we have explicit formulas for the @xmath0-matrix elements , which depend on @xmath439 , temperature , and @xmath464 , let us discuss again how to extract @xmath464 from the ramsey - fringes data . in the presence of energy relaxation ( at arbitrary temperature ) the ramsey oscillations are @xmath465 therefore , if the energy relaxation time @xmath324 is measured separately , the ramsey data give the value of @xmath466 at any time @xmath412 . this value can be used to calculate the @xmath0-matrix even in the case of arbitrary non - exponential dephasing . now let us discuss the @xmath0-matrix at a relatively short time @xmath412 and neglect the terms quadratic in time . then we obtain @xmath467 in the case of exponential pure dephasing @xmath468 , and then @xmath469 , where @xmath470 and @xmath471 is the dephasing time . in this appendix we discuss the technique of kraus operators applied to the evolution described by the standard lindblad - form master equation . we show that each lindblad term describes two evolutions : a `` jump '' process with some rate and a continuous evolution between the jumps caused by the absence of jumps . such interpretation can be useful in intuitive analysis of decoherence processes . a markovian evolution of a quantum system is usually described by the lindblad - form master equation [ for convenience we copy eq.([lindblad - evol ] ) here ] = - [ h , ] + _ n _ n ( b_nb_n^- b_n^b_n- b_n^b_n ) , [ lindblad]where the first term describes the unitary evolution due to the hamiltonian @xmath472 , while the @xmath184th decoherence mechanism is described by the `` rate '' @xmath473 ( real number with dimension s@xmath474 ) and dimensionless operator @xmath475 . note that mathematically @xmath473 can be absorbed by redefining @xmath476 ; however , we do not do this because @xmath473 and @xmath475 have separate physical meanings . our goal here is to discuss a simple physical interpretation of the decoherence terms in the lindblad equation . for simplicity let us neglect the unitary evolution ( @xmath477 ) and consider first only one decoherence mechanism ; then we can omit the index @xmath184 ( summation over @xmath184 is simple ) . it is easy to check that the term @xmath478 corresponds to the abrupt change ( `` jump '' ) of the state | = , = , [ jump]which occurs with the rate ( jump probability per second ) = || b|||^2 , = tr ( b b^ ) = tr ( b^b ) . [ rate](here we show the formulas in both the wavefunction and density matrix languages ; the wavefunction language is usually more convenient to use . ) note a possible confusion in terminology : both @xmath322 and @xmath479 are rates ; to distinguish them let us call @xmath322 the `` process rate '' or just `` rate '' , while @xmath479 will be called `` jump rate '' . the remaining term @xmath480 in the lindblad form corresponds to the jump process ( [ jump ] ) _ not happening_. the physical reason of this evolution `` when nothing happens '' is the same as the partial collapse in the null - result measurement @xcite : this is essentially the bayesian update @xcite , which accounts for the information that the jump did not happen . therefore , _ the physical meaning of the lindblad form is the description of two scenarios : the jump process either happening or not happening . _ to see this mathematically , let us use the technique of kraus operators @xcite , in which the evolution @xmath481 is unraveled into the probabilistic mixture of `` scenarios '' described by kraus operators @xmath109 , @xmath482 [ in the wavefunction language @xmath483 . the sum of the probabilities should be equal to 1 , which leads to the completeness relation _ k a_k^a_k = . [ completeness]note the change of notations compared with eq.([kraus - representation ] ) . during a short time @xmath286 the evolution ( [ lindblad ] ) can be described by two scenarios : the jump either occurs or not , with the corresponding kraus operators @xmath484 and @xmath435 . for the jump scenario a_jump= b , so that @xmath485 gives the same contribution to @xmath486 as the term @xmath487 in eq.([lindblad ] ) . the no - jump kraus operator @xmath435 should satisfy the completeness relation ( [ completeness ] ) , @xmath488 . using the bayesian - update approach @xcite in which @xmath489 , we find @xmath490 note that @xmath491 is a positive hermitian operator and @xmath492 is also a positive operator . a square root of a positive operator is defined via taking square roots of its eigenvalues in the diagonalizing basis . this is why in eq . ( [ a - no ] ) we deal with operators essentially as with numbers . using eq . ( [ a - no-2 ] ) for @xmath435 , we find in the linear order a_no a_no^- t b^b - t b^b , [ a - no - evol]with this linear - order approximation becoming exact at @xmath493 . it is easy to see that eq . ( [ a - no - evol ] ) gives the evolution described by the term @xmath494 in the lindblad form ( [ lindblad ] ) . thus we have shown that the lindblad - form master equation ( [ lindblad ] ) with one decoherence term describes a jump process @xmath283 [ see eq . ( [ jump ] ) ] occurring with the jump rate ( probability per second ) @xmath495 . in the case of several decoherence mechanisms there are several kraus operators @xmath496 describing the jumps @xmath497 during a short duration @xmath286 . the no - jump kraus operator in this case is @xmath498 , which contributes to all terms @xmath499 in eq . ( [ lindblad ] ) . note that eq . ( [ a - no ] ) and its generalization for several processes is not the unique form for @xmath435 , which follows from the completeness relation ( [ completeness ] ) . it is formally possible to add an arbitrary unitary rotation @xmath6 , so that @xmath500 , which does not affect @xmath501 . using a natural assumption that @xmath502 at @xmath503 , we can expand @xmath6 in the linear order as @xmath504 , where @xmath505 should be a hermitian matrix . then @xmath506 acquires the extra term @xmath507\delta t$ ] , from which we see that @xmath505 is essentially an addition to the hamiltonian @xmath472 . so the formalism permits a change of the hamiltonian due to decoherence , and therefore @xmath472 in eq.([lindblad ] ) should be considered as the effective hamiltonian ( which may include the `` lamb shift '' mechanism ) . for a qubit relaxation from the excited state @xmath424 to the ground state @xmath421 with the rate @xmath508 , the jump operator is @xmath509 , where the ground state corresponds to the upper line , so that @xmath510 , @xmath511 . in this case @xmath512 , so that the no - jump evolution during time @xmath286 changes the qubit state as |0+|1 , [ qubit - relax - no - jump]while in the case of jump obviously @xmath513 can be taken into account in the similar way using an additional lindblad - form term . the physical mechanism of the markovian pure dephasing in superconducting qubits is the fast ( `` white noise '' ) fluctuations of the qubit energy , which leads to random fluctuations of the qubit phase @xmath514 , so that the random phase shift @xmath515 accumulated during a short time @xmath286 has the gaussian probability distribution with zero mean and variance @xmath516 , where @xmath325 is the dephasing time . it is easy to check that the correct evolution due to pure dephasing [ @xmath517 , @xmath518 , @xmath519 can be reproduced using the lindblad equation ( [ lindblad ] ) with @xmath520 and @xmath521 . this means that instead of the physically correct picture of continuous change of @xmath381 , we may use a completely different picture : random jumps of the phase @xmath381 by @xmath344 , |0+|1|0-|1 , occuring with the jump rate [ see eq . ( [ rate ] ) ] @xmath522 , which in this case is independent of the qubit state and equal to @xmath322 . note that @xmath523 , so in this case there is no no - jump evolution . since both pictures lead to the same evolution of @xmath524 , we can use any of them , depending on convenience in a particular problem . one more picture which can be used for pure dephasing is the `` random measurement of state @xmath421 '' , for which @xmath525 and @xmath526 . it is easy to see that it leads to the same lindblad equation , but has different jump process and non - trivial no - jump evolution . obviously , we can also use @xmath527 and @xmath526 for the same master equation ( see the brief discussion in sec.[sec - lindblad - error ] of the transformation @xmath528 in the lindblad equation ) . the decay of a resonator state is usually characterized by the energy decay rate @xmath529 , so that in the qubit terminology @xmath530 . the standard lindblad form ( [ lindblad ] ) in this case has @xmath531 and @xmath532 , where @xmath533 is the annihilation operator , @xmath534 . the jump evolution is then | , [ res - jump]with the jump rate [ see eq . ( [ rate ] ) ] @xmath535 , where @xmath536 is the average number of photons . the no - jump evolution during time @xmath286 is then _ n _ n |n , [ res - no - jump]which is similar to the no - jump evolution ( [ qubit - relax - no - jump ] ) for the qubit . note that the probability of the no - jump evolution is given by the squared norm , @xmath537 , so that the sum of the jump and no - jump probabilities is 1 . it is interesting to analyze the special case : evolution of a coherent state , @xmath538 . since it is the eigenstate of the operator @xmath533 , the jump evolution ( [ res - jump ] ) does not change the state , while the continuous no - jump evolution essentially changes the parameter @xmath539 in time , @xmath540 . therefore the energy decay is due to the no - jump evolution only . in this ( very unusual ) case a pure initial state remains pure because the jump does not change the state and therefore it is essentially a one - scenario ( no - jump ) evolution . the standard lindblad - form evolution for the resonator with @xmath531 and @xmath532 can be understood in the following way . let us assume that @xmath529 is the coupling with the outside modes , and let us imagine ( gedankenexperiment ) that we use an ideal photon detector , which clicks every time when a photon escapes from the resonator . when the detector clicks , we know that there is one photon less in the resonator . however , all transitions @xmath541 are indistinguishable ( because the energy levels are equidistant ) , and therefore the bayesian update of the quantum state @xcite involves only the rates , which are proportional to @xmath184 , _ it is easy to see that this bayesian update coincides with the jump process ( [ res - jump ] ) , and therefore the lindblad - form evolution can be interpreted as being due to an outside measurement with a single - photon detector . [ note that the lindblad - form master equation describes the ensemble - averaged evolution ; this is why we are free to choose any measurement model , in contrast to the case of individual ( selective ) evolution , which depends on what is actually measured . ] the energy relaxation ( at zero temperature ) in a slightly ahnarmonic superconducting 3-level qubit is sometimes described by essentially the same lindblad equation as for the resonator , with @xmath542 and @xmath532 , so that latexmath:[$b|2\rangle = \sqrt{2 } \ , @xmath511 . this is actually incorrect . the reason is that the qubit is anharmonic , and therefore in the described above gedankenexperiment it is in principle possible to distinguish transitions @xmath544 where the top row corresponds to the state @xmath421 and the bottom row corresponds to @xmath545 . the formula @xmath546 is not exact because of anharmonicity . if for more accuracy we want to take into account direct transitions @xmath547)([3-level-2 ] ) , the ( incorrect ) one - process description ( with @xmath532 ) adds the extra term @xmath548 into @xmath549 , while other terms in these two approaches coincide . concluding this appendix , we emphasize that unraveling of the lindblad - form evolution into the `` jump '' and `` no - jump '' processes is often useful for gaining intuition in the analysis of decoherence , and it may also be useful in analytical and numerical calculations . t. yamamoto , m. neeley , e. lucero , r. c. bialczak , j. kelly , m. lenander , m. mariantoni , a. d. oconnell , d. sank , h. wang , m. weides , j. wenner , y. yin , a. n. cleland , and j. m. martinis , phys . b * 82 * , 184515 ( 2010 ) . e. magesan , j. m. gambetta , b. r. johnson , c. a. ryan , j. m. chow , s. t. merkel , m. p. da silva , g. a. keefe , m. b. rothwell , t. a. ohki , m. b. ketchen , and m. steffen , phys . rev . lett . * 109 * , 080505 ( 2012 ) . j. kelly , r. barends , j. bochmann , b. campbell , y. chen , b. chiaro , e. jeffrey , m. mariantoni , a. megrant , j. mutus , c. neill , p. omalley , s. ohya , p. roushan , d. sank , a. vainsencher , j. wenner , t. white , a. n. cleland , and j. m. martinis , bull . . soc . * 58 * , g26.00005 ( 2013 ) . j. m. chow , j. m. gambetta , a. d. corcoles , s. t. merkel , j. a. smolin , c. rigetti , s. poletto , g. a. keefe , m. b. rothwell , j. r. rozen , m. b. ketchen , and m. steffen , phys . rev 109 * , 060501 ( 2012 ) . to discuss orthogonality and normalization of matrices , we need to define the inner product of matrices @xmath551 and @xmath283 of equal size . this can be done by direct generalization of the innner product of two vectors : the matrices are treated as vectors , and the inner product is defined element - by - element as @xmath552 . this is called frobenius or hilbert - schmidt inner product ; we use the notation similar to the notation for vectors in quantum mechanics , while in mathematics notations @xmath553 or @xmath554 are often used . it is easy to see that @xmath555 . this definition leads to the frobenius ( hilbert - schmidt ) norm for a matrix : @xmath556 . m. mariantoni , h. wang , t. yamamoto , m. neeley , r.c . bialczak , y. chen , m. lenander , e. lucero , a.d . oconnell , d. sank , m. weides , j. wenner , y. yin , j. zhao , a.n . korotkov , a.n . cleland , and j.m . martinis , science * 334 * , 61 ( 2011 ) . a. galiautdinov , a. n. korotkov , and j. m. martinis , phys . a * 85 * , 042321 ( 2012 ) ; j. ghosh , a. galiautdinov , z. zhou , a. n. korotkov , j. m. martinis , and m. r. geller , phys . rev . a * 87 * , 022309 ( 2013 ) . Abstract:

Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.

Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered . Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video . Paper: infrastructure as a service ( iaas ) systems @xcite build on virtualisation technologies to allow automated infrastructure provisioning . virtual machine ( vm ) based provisioning gives users two major benefits : they do not need to be experts in physical infrastructure maintenance , and they can easily follow their demand patterns and scale their virtual computing infrastructure ( composed of several vms ) with tools built on top of iaas systems . these two benefits led to the wide and rapid adoption of such infrastructure offerings . unfortunately , their rapid adoption has led to infrastructures that still have plenty of open research issues ( e.g. , energy aware vm placement , service level objective specifications ) . however , even iaas systems operated by academia are used in production nowadays . as production level systems are used by a multitude of users on a daily basis , changing the internal behaviour of such systems might hinder their user experience ( such as reliability and usability ) . thus , research focused on improving the internals of iaas systems ( e.g. , introducing a new experimental virtual machine placement algorithm ) can not be done on such production systems directly . consequently , to analyse new and novel ideas for internal behaviour , researchers are either restricted to severely limited iaas deployments ( e.g. , rarely utilising more than a few hosts ) or should resort to theoretical modelling of expected internal behaviour . however , results based on such research is often questioned by the operators of production clouds because their applicability to large scale systems is often not proven . some researchers use simulators to further evaluate their models @xcite . these simulators allow researchers the evaluation of new ideas in life - like scenarios and as a result such simulators could pave the way for the new research results allowing their wide - spread adoption . although a plethora of iaas related simulators exist even today , these simulators have very different focuses . some are designed completely from the user s point of view and hide the cloud s internals so users can make decisions on how and what services should be moved to the clouds @xcite . because of their user orientation , in these simulators it is frequently problematic to introduce changes in iaas behaviour . some others @xcite emphasise the need for precision for such simulations . despite their extensibility , these simulators not only scale very poorly ( making it problematic to evaluate more elaborate iaas scenarios where sometimes thousands of physical machines collaborate ) , but they also require complex setup procedures to be precise ( e.g. , one should model every possible application in the system to receive realistic results ) . finally , there are simulators that introduce some assumptions in the system that reduce the precision of the simulations but reach unprecedented speeds @xcite . unfortunately , despite having clear advantages , they are too specific to allow investigations on internal iaas changes ( e.g. , groudsim only models external interfaces of clouds , simgrid merely focuses on virtualisation , and cloudsim has conflicting extensions e.g. , power modelling is not available while using networking ) . in this article , a new versatile simulation framework is presented ( called discrete event based energy consumption simulator for clouds and federations dissect - cf ) . compared to the previously mentioned simulators , dissect - cf offers two major benefits : a unified resource sharing model , and a more complete iaas stack simulation ( including for example virtual machine image repositories , storage and in - data - centre networking ) . the benefits of the sharing model are threefold : @xmath0 it allows a single framework to model resource bottlenecks ( e.g. , cpu , network ) , @xmath1 generic resource sharing performance optimisations immediately improve entire simulations , @xmath2 it provides a unified view on resource usage counters ( i.e. , allows resource type independent , generic monitoring ) . finally , dissect - cf also opens up possibilities for more fine - grained energy consumption modelling by allowing the user to derive energy consumption from multiple resource usage counters . as a result of these new advancements , the new simulator could foster research on schedulers that could either have better insight into internal iaas behaviour or collaborate with internal schedulers of iaas systems in order to achieve previously unprecedented flexibility , adaptability and elasticity in future cloud systems . unfortunately , dissect - cf s focus on supporting research on infrastructure cloud schedulers introduces several limitations to its applicability . first of all , for performance reasons the simulator represents networks with a simple flow model , which has already been shown by several studies ( e.g. , @xcite ) to be inaccurate for smaller - sized network transfers . fortunately , smaller - sized network transfers have a negligible influence on scheduling decisions in most cloud related schedulers . also , because scheduler focused research usually uses task or virtual machine instantiation / termination traces for behavioural studies , dissect - cf uses the black box philosophy for applications . thus , the simulator will not provide accurate results on resource utilisation if a particular application s behaviour can not be approximated with simple resource consumption metrics ( e.g. , when there is unstable cpu utilisation for extended periods of time ) . in fact , these limitations are present in most simulators ( except those that have packet level network simulations or employ more complex flow models see @xcite ) . finally , as the new simulator is aimed at providing a framework for researchers to experiment with the internals of infrastructure clouds , the included scheduling mechanisms themselves are present only as examples for future work and they do not extend the scheduling related state - of - the art themselves . the behaviour of dissect - cf was analysed by first validating it against the behaviour of a small - scale infrastructure cloud at the university of innsbruck . according to the findings of this article , the system s simulated behaviour matches real - life experiments with negligible error ( in terms of application execution time , larger scale network transfers and energy consumption ) . for larger scale experiments , dissect - cf was validated with proven results from two other simulators that are close to the new simulator s functionality ( namely cloudsim @xcite and groudsim @xcite ) . then , performance of these two simulators was compared to the newly proposed one . comparisons were executed with both real - world ( using the grid workloads archive @xcite ) and synthetic traces . the use of real - world traces also revealed that dissect - cf based simulations allow 1.5 - 32@xmath3 faster behavioural analysis of simple cloud schedulers or vm placement strategies . the performance differences were further investigated through synthetic traces and it is shown that dissect - cf scales significantly better in complex resource sharing situations with the help of its unified resource sharing model ( one can observe an improvement of even over 2800@xmath3 in execution time in some cases ) . the rest of this article is organised as follows . section [ sec - relworks ] presents the related research results . then , section [ sec - design ] reveals the architecture of the newly proposed simulator and discusses its internal behaviour and extensibility options . section [ sec - eval ] analyses the properties of dissect - cf by comparing its behaviour to real - life systems and by comparing its performance to other simulators . finally , section [ sec - conclusion ] concludes the article with a summary and with the identification of future research directions . this section first reviews the scheduling scenarios that a cloud simulator might support . then an overview is presented on the most popular cloud simulation platforms . finally , the section concludes with a problem statement for the new simulator . there are seven common kinds of schedulers that could have an influence on the behaviour of a virtual infrastructure created on top of iaas cloud systems . in the following , a short overview is given of these kinds of schedulers with special attention on their requirements from a simulated environment . the list is presented from the schedulers that have the strongest user - side orientation to the most hidden schedulers in infrastructure systems . if a user has large enough resource demands , then its virtual infrastructure might include multiple virtual machines that could host a particular kind of task . in such cases , whenever a new task arrives , the user has to decide on which virtual machine it should actually run the task . the decision can be automated with a scheduler and a queuing system ( similar to local resource managers e.g. , @xcite ) . in order to support research on these kinds of schedulers , _ simulators should be able to provide past and present vm level performance metrics _ ( e.g. , temporal performance degradation of the vm s computing capabilities ) . when a user s resource demands are more dynamic and sometimes unpredictable , then he / she would frequently face heavy under- or over - utilisation of his / her virtual infrastructure . to better meet the demands of the newly arriving tasks , the virtual infrastructure should be able to automatically scale . this scaling is often achieved with a special scheduler ( e.g. , @xcite ) that decides when to instantiate / terminate a particular kind of vm . research on such schedulers need _ simulators that are capable of providing accurate vm management metrics _ ( e.g. , virtual machine instantiation time ) . some users have access to multiple cloud infrastructures . for such users , a new scheduler is needed ( e.g. , @xcite ) which can choose between various cloud providers and dispatch vms to them . the selection procedure is expected to take into account the availability , reliability and similar metrics of the various providers and also it should consider issues like placing processing close to big data . for such schedulers , _ simulators are required to offer infrastructure provider level metrics and data locality information . _ inside iaas systems , user requests are no longer represented as tasks but they are only seen as vms . as iaas systems are highly automated , decisions to place a particular vm on a physical machine must be also done by a scheduler . this kind of scheduler ( e.g. , @xcite ) could have two main tasks : @xmath0 for already existing virtual machines , a new vm to host mapping could be identified which would allow a vm arrangement that considers both the vms actual load and the providers current needs , and @xmath1 for newly requested virtual machines , the scheduler should determine the host where the vm could be run . as these schedulers have diverse tasks , _ simulators should have the capability to disseminate the load of currently running virtual machines and also the utilisation of physical machines_. energy conscious iaas systems aim at reducing their energy consumption in several ways . a simple way to do so is to consolidate vm load to the most energy efficient machines and switch the rest to a more energy efficient state . the automated decisions on which machines should be serving vms and which ones should be waiting in low power states ( e.g. , suspend , switch off ) are done by physical machine schedulers ( e.g. , @xcite ) . these schedulers should ensure that , because of their operations , virtual machine creation and quality of service do not degrade below certain levels . to support the development of physical machine ( pm ) schedulers , _ simulators must necessarily maintain the cost of pm power state changes _ ( e.g. , cold / suspend to ram boot - up procedures ) . schedulers are also present in virtual machine monitors ( like xen or kvm ) in order to allocate physical resources to virtual machines on a time - sharing basis ( e.g. , @xcite ) . although , these schedulers are not the main focus of research in cloud computing , they could have a direct impact on the quality of service if the above - mentioned vm placement strategies under - provision some virtual machines . for this reason , _ simulators should be able to correctly handle and report under - provisioning scenarios on physical machines_. the lowest levels of schedulers that may affect higher - level ( e.g. , task to vm assignment ) decisions are the process schedulers ( e.g. , @xcite ) of the operating system in the user s vms . in some cases the user could have an influence on the os scheduler , but in others users must use oss and schedulers that are prepared and accredited by the iaas providers . since these schedulers are generic os level schedulers , they are out of the scope of cloud computing research . but since higher - level schedulers might make decisions on how these process schedulers behave , simulators should give their users some information on their behaviour . for example , _ simulators should be capable of reporting if a particular vm is under - provisioned _ and tasks have no chance to access resources scheduled for them by the os level scheduler . cloudsim @xcite is amongst the most popular iaas cloud simulators . it was initially based on gridsim ( a widely used grid simulator developed by the same research institute @xcite ) but , after some performance and reliability issues , it was completely rewritten so it uses only some concepts ( e.g. , cloudlet gridlet analogy ) from its predecessor @xcite . cloudsim introduced the simulation of virtualised data centres mostly focusing on computational intensive tasks and data interchanges between data centres . later , they extended the simulation to better support internal network communications of a data centre with networkcloudsim @xcite . there are also extensions that simulate the energy consumption behaviour of the physical machines in the data centre based on specpower benchmarks and on dynamic voltage and frequency scaling @xcite . cloudsim also formed an ecosystem . several third parties offer extensions on top of cloudsim . some significantly change cloudsim behaviour ( e.g. , add performance improvements @xcite , add better support for inter - cloud operations @xcite , implement new energy consumption models @xcite , or introduce sla concepts into the simulation @xcite ) , while others wrap cloudsim and provide additional functionality ( like graphical user interfaces for teaching @xcite or for analytics @xcite ) . despite its wide use , cloudsim has several disadvantages : @xmath4 low performance for scheduling research where thousands of scheduling scenarios should be evaluated in a timely fashion , @xmath5 networking is simulated for tasks only ( e.g. , data centre operations that utilise the same network as user tasks like virtual machine image transfers are not simulated even though they could have significant effects on the user perceived network performance ) and @xmath6 using multiple extensions at once is frequently not possible ( e.g. , advanced networking and energy consumption modelling are not usable together since one would need to have virtual machines that inherit behaviour both from ` powervm ` and from ` networkvm ` classes ) . the simgrid framework @xcite is another widely used simulator for analysing the behaviour of distributed systems ( e.g. , grids , peer to peer systems ) . its resource sharing simulation is one of the most detailed ; for example , it contains one of the most accurate non - packet oriented network models @xcite . this simulator s focus was not particularly on clouds for a long time but recently its developers introduced extensions for virtualisation ( e.g. , hypervisors or live migration because of its distributed systems and grid background the simulator is inefficient in iaas cloud related situations . for example , this simulator stops at the virtual machine level , thus it would require significant effort to build a multi data centre / cloud simulation on top of it . while cloudsim and simgrid were heavily influenced by previous simulators for grids and distributed systems , for performance reasons they also make compromises on networking . to resolve such issues there are simulators like icancloud @xcite and greencloud @xcite that are built on network simulators ( e.g. , omnet++ or ns2 ) to more accurately simulate network communications in cloud systems . their efforts result in great accuracy if all iaas components and applications are modelled correctly network - wise ; otherwise , they just introduce serious performance penalties because of the packet level simulations without the expected accuracy . in addition to networking improvements , greencloud @xcite is also offering precise energy estimations for networking and computing components , while icancloud also offers a user oriented simulation which supports iaas utilisation decision - making @xcite on top of the regular iaas related simulation functionalities @xcite . next , groudsim a simulator developed at the university of innsbruck @xcite was analysed . this simulator aims at performance while it encompasses cloud concepts in a grid simulator environment . the simulator is also integrated with the askalon workflow system @xcite so it can be used to evaluate behavioural changes of real - life scientific workflows in the case of changes in the computing environment . although this simulator supports clouds , it does not provide implementation on the internals of iaas systems ( i.e. , it provides a black box implementation ) , thus it is not suitable for research studies that involve the internals of cloud infrastructures . and although groudsim supports both cpu and network resources , the networking implementation of groudsim is one of the least developed ones amongst the reviewed simulators . the above simulators focus more on the user related behaviour of data centres , but there is a class of cloud simulators which is more focused on supporting decisions related to data centre operations ( e.g. , @xcite ) . so even though these simulators could be used for examining user related behaviour , their detailed implementation of data centre behaviour reduces their usability in this context . on the other hand , these simulators offer some unique features that might be useful for research on iaas related schedulers . for example , speci @xcite is focused on offering a tool to analyse the scalability of iaas toolkits that will support future data centres . next , dcsim @xcite allows the analysis of new virtual machine management operations ( like relocation ) . finally , dcworms @xcite provides a unique view on data centre energy efficiency , including the heating , ventilation and air conditioning ( hvac ) system s airflow and high granularity resource ( e.g. , individual cpu , memory modules , network interfaces ) energy modelling . [ [ problem - statement ] ] problem statement + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + the analysis of the related work leads to the conclusion that existing simulators have many drawbacks for those who would like to investigate scheduling scenarios in iaas systems . to fulfil the needs of such scheduling scenarios , the rest of the article reveals a new infrastructure simulator that provides better insights on infrastructure behaviour for schedulers while maintaining the scalability of past simulators . ] figure [ fig - arch ] presents the overall architecture of the newly proposed simulator . the figure groups the major components with dashed lines into subsystems . each subsystem is implemented as independently from the others as possible . as a result , simulation developers do not need to understand the complexity of the entire simulator if they intend to work on one of its subsystems . there are five major subsystems ; they are listed in an order that follows their level of abstraction ( from the most abstract to the more specific to iaas systems ) : these components provide the time reference for simulations . this subsystem acts as a lightweight and extensible foundation to low - level computing resource sharing ( e.g. , cpu , i / o ) . with these components dissect - cf enables simulator developers to monitor and analyse energy usage patterns of each individually simulated resource ( e.g. , network links , disks ) . these components handle the behaviour of those iaas system parts ( e.g. , virtual machines ) that are the primary target of iaas related schedulers . this subsystem provides the user interface ( the vm management api ) and represents the high level functionalities ( e.g. , virtual machine schedulers ) of infrastructure clouds . in the following sections , these subsystems are individually discussed . the core of the dissect - cf simulator is a simple but high performance event generator ( reflected as ` timed ` in figure [ fig - arch ] ) . it is used to maintain the time within the simulated system and allow third parties to be notified if a particular time instance has been reached.the simulator is not aware of the applied time granularity ( i.e. , it is not known in the simulation if a single increase in the maintained time is equivalent to a single millisecond or a full hour ) . this enables flexibility in use , and allows simulation developers to have precision only when they assuredly need it ; otherwise , they can benefit from faster simulations . in later sections of the article , the smallest time granularity for the current simulation is denoted with @xmath7 and is expressed in seconds . thus any given time instance in the simulator can be specified as : @xmath8 , where @xmath9 and @xmath10 . here , @xmath11refers to the set of all possible time instances throughout a simulation . the simulator also assumes that notifications are recurring . thus , subscribing to events means specifying the frequency with which one would like to be notified . the simulator contains a construct ( called ` deferredevent ` ) for non - recurring events . creating a subclass of either the ` timed ` or the ` deferredevent ` classes allows simulation developers to receive custom time dependent notifications . finally , the ` timed ` class is also the control point for the simulation time . simulations have two distinct ways to influence simulated time : controls directly influence the timer . first , one can _ fire _ the events for the current time instance then advance the timer by one @xmath12 . second , it is possible to ask for a time jump that will progress the time with a given interval if within the interval there are no events expected . controls let the simulation flow for a given time interval without any intervention ( e.g. , one can simulate until all events from the queue are cleaned up ) . these controls also enable the progression of the timer while dropping irrelevant events that would occur in a given period of time . directly on top of basic time management lies the resource model of the simulator . the model is intended to capture low - level resource sharing behaviour ( e.g. , assigning tasks to virtual cpus of vms or virtual cpus to physical ones , or balancing network bandwidth utilisation ) . dissect - cf applies a provider - consumer scheme to resources where resource consumptions are intermediaries between consumers and providers . in the case of simulated cpus , consumptions represent instructions to be processed , thus cpu computing cycles of a physical machine are provided to virtual machines to consume . in a network analogy , consumptions represent data to be transferred between two network hosts ( where the sender acts as the provider and the receiver as the consumer ) . dissect - cf allows the definition of both providers and consumers with the help of the ` resourcespreader ` class ( see figure [ fig - arch ] ) . the set of all spreaders in a particular simulation will be referred as @xmath13 . the simulator uses the concept of resource consumptions as the intermediaries that represent the current processing demands of the actual consumers . resource consumptions are denoted with a triplet : @xmath14 , where @xmath15 represents the resource consumption , @xmath16 represents the processing that is currently under way , @xmath17 represents the remaining processing ( i.e. , processing that has not started yet ) and @xmath18 represents the limit for this processing in a single @xmath12 ( e.g. , simulation developers can specify that a resource consumption is single - threaded so it can use the processing power of a single processor of a consumable cpu resource only ) . @xmath19 represents all possible resource consumptions in a simulation : @xmath20 . at a given time instance , the function @xmath21 determines which provider offers the resources to be consumed . similarly , @xmath22 defines the consumer that utilises the offered resources . these functions are time dependent to allow the migration of resource consumptions amongst spreaders . at a given time , a particular resource consumption is processed in its provider by determining how much processing can be considered possible during a single @xmath12 . the possible processing has an upper bound of @xmath17 ( i.e. , if more processing could be possible than there is still remaining in @xmath15 , then the provider will have some non - utilised processing capabilities ) . also , the possible processing is limited by the provider s maximum processing capability and the processing limit @xmath18 of the consumption . @xmath23 where @xmath24 , @xmath25 and @xmath26 represent the processing under way , the remaining processing and the limit , respectively , for resource consumption @xmath15 at the time instance @xmath27 . it must be pointed out that @xmath28 is offering the provider side under processing value only . finally , @xmath29 reveals the processing power of a resource spreader ( in this current case the provider for resource consumption @xmath15 : @xmath30 ) at the time instance @xmath27 . dissect - cf simulates consumers with similar behaviour , so they remove utilised resources from @xmath16 . of course in this case the limit of utilisation is dependent on the consumer and the previously evaluated provider side possible processing value : @xmath31 thus , to determine the state of a particular resource consumption , dissect - cf first evaluates the provider side of resource consumptions , and then it processes the consumer side . after the simulator determined the @xmath16 value for a resource consumption , the remaining consumption @xmath32 can be determined as well by reducing with the increment of the @xmath16 value . this behaviour ensures that at the end of the consumer side processing both @xmath16 and @xmath17 will represent the resource consumption s state in the next simulated time instance ( @xmath33 ) . in order to determine how much processing can be done on resource consumptions at a particular time instance @xmath34 , resource spreaders apply the lowest level schedulers in dissect - cf based simulations . these schedulers share the processing capacities of the resources amongst those resource consumptions that the spreaders are currently dealing with ( @xmath35 , where the notation of @xmath36 is used to depict a power set ) . as simulation developers are expected to run simulations with thousands of resources and millions of resource consumptions , these low - level schedulers must be highly customisable and efficient . to enable simple customisability , dissect - cf provides efficient implementations for most common scheduling related tasks ( e.g. , resource consumption registration , de - registration , event generation for parties interested in resource consumption state ) , allowing providers of new schedulers to just focus on the scheduling logic that calculates the new @xmath34 values . + the scheduling logic is expected to deliver fair resource allocation for simultaneously occurring resource consumptions denoted as @xmath37 . to simplify the behaviour and complexity of schedulers , dissect - cf also introduces the concept of influence groups . these groups are formed from all resource spreaders that have a chance to influence each other s resource allocation schedules . with the help of influence groups even schedules for complex network structures can be simulated at close - to - real - life behaviour ( e.g. , the simulator can apply fair share algorithms over multiple related network links ) . these schedulers can utilise influence groups as their domain in which they have to guarantee a fair resource schedule for the spreader associated resource consumptions . to determine the membership of an influence group , the simulator uses the resource consumptions that link consumers and providers ( see figure [ fig - inf - gen ] ) . as a practical example , figure [ fig - inf - cpu ] shows how each simulated physical machine forms independent influence groups with the virtual machines it hosts via their respective cpu spreader implementations . formally , an influence group of a resource spreader at the particular time instance is defined as follows ( @xmath38 ) : @xmath39 where @xmath40 is a resource spreader , and the function @xmath41 defines the spreaders available at a particular time instance . the equation shows that @xmath42 includes all resource spreaders that are directly or transitively referred by the associated resource consumptions of the spreader @xmath43 @xmath44 . as a result , one could find as many influence groups as the number of resource spreaders existing at a given time instance in the simulation . on the other hand , these groups are frequently equivalent because determining the influence group of any member of a particular group will result in the original influence group : @xmath45 this last equation is derived from the definition of @xmath42 and reveals that after the proper calculation of @xmath42 there should not be any members of it ( e.g. , @xmath46 ) that would result in a different influence group than the original @xmath42 . although the definition of @xmath47 is quite straightforward , its evaluation in all necessary time instances for all relevant resource spreaders would result in significant simulation performance deterioration . therefore , dissect - cf provides an algorithm that significantly reduces the use of @xmath47 but still ensures that the influence groups are available for the scheduling logic in every time instance . to differentiate between the original function s results and the algorithm calculated values , the notation @xmath48 is used for the influence groups determined by the algorithm ( see algorithm [ alg - basopt ] ) . @xmath49 @xmath50 [ lin - ext - start ] @xmath51 [ lin - emptyext ] @xmath52 [ lin - identadd ] @xmath53 [ lin - extgadd ] @xmath54 [ lin - realext ] @xmath55 [ lin - igextcomplete ] [ lin - ext - stop ] [ lin - split - start ] @xmath56 @xmath57 [ lin - randsel ] @xmath58 [ lin - correct - group ] @xmath59 [ lin - split - upd - start ] @xmath60 [ lin - split - upd - stop ] [ lin - split - stop ] in the following few paragraphs , the internal behaviour of the new algorithm is discussed . it is built on the assumption that @xmath61 and it is composed of two distinct phases : influence group extension see lines [ lin - ext - start]-[lin - ext - stop ] and group dissolution see lines [ lin - split - start]-[lin - split - stop ] . let us first discuss the extension phase . during this phase , the algorithm first starts with an empty resource spreader set ( see line [ lin - emptyext ] ) that will later on hold the identified extensions of the input influence group @xmath49 . as a next step , line [ lin - identadd ] determines the resource consumptions that arrived to a particular resource spreader at the time instance @xmath33 . afterwards , the following line focuses on those newly added resource consumptions that introduce new resource spreader members into the input influence group . these non - member providers or consumers are added to the extension set in line [ lin - extgadd ] . this iteratively created extension set is used to actualise the input influence group in lines [ lin - realext]-[lin - igextcomplete ] . the extension phase completes only when there are no newly introduced resource spreader members in the input group . otherwise , the current phase is repeated to ensure finding even further group extensions via the resource consumptions associated with the introduced members ( this last step is shown in line [ lin - ext - stop ] ) . after there are no new extension possibilities found in the current influence group , the algorithm proceeds to its second phase in which it identifies all splits of the current influence group . for example , influence group # 5 in figure [ fig - inf - gen ] will have to be split when the resource consumption between provider @xmath62 and consumer @xmath63 finishes . to identify the need for splitting , the algorithm therefore first determines if there were some resource consumptions dropped from at least one member of the influence group ( see line [ lin - split - start ] ) . if there is a need for splitting , then the algorithm will maintain the not yet split parts of the original influence group in @xmath64 . in order to determine which parts have to be split from the not yet split parts , lines [ lin - randsel ] and [ lin - correct - group ] use the original @xmath65 on a randomly selected spreader from @xmath64 resulting in a new influence group called @xmath66 . in the next line , the not yet split parts are updated so that only those resource spreaders will be considered afterwards that are not in @xmath66 . finally , the algorithm updates its self - maintained influence group membership so all members of @xmath66 will be exactly the same ( see lines [ lin - split - upd - start]-[lin - split - upd - stop ] ) . to conclude , the newly introduced algorithm reduces the number of direct @xmath42 function calculations to those cases where there is a chance to have a group to be split . and even in that case , it ensures that the number of @xmath42 evaluations is limited by the number of influence groups created after a split . ] the last remaining part of the unified resource model is the simulation developer customisable low - level scheduling logic . to understand the customisation options dissect - cf offers , figure [ fig - rs ] presents the context of the scheduling logic . the figure reveals the role of the low - level scheduler through the illustration of the life of a single resource consumption that can be represented in three phases and denoted with different kinds of arrows : preparation regular lines ; resource consumption dashed lines ; and completion dotted lines . the next paragraphs provide a brief overview of these three phases . first , the preparation phase is initiated by the entity who is responsible for creating ( see _ step 1 _ in the figure ) a particular resource consumption @xmath67 . this entity could be an automated process ( e.g. , a workload generator ) or some higher - level entity of the simulator ( e.g. , the virtual machine representation ) . after creation , the registration can be initiated in any time instance @xmath27 after both the consumer @xmath68 and the provider @xmath69 spreaders are specified . the registration is accomplished in _ step 2 _ in the figure . the provider nudges the scheduler base in _ step 3 _ after both the consumer and the provider have registered the new resource consumption @xmath70 and @xmath71 . the _ scheduler base _ is implemented in the base class of all resource spreaders and is responsible for interfacing with the event system , the scheduler and the influence group management algorithm . before contacting the event system for subscription , the scheduler base first updates the influence groups with algorithm [ alg - basopt ] in _ step 4_. after the identification of all distinct influence groups , the scheduler base filters those groups that would need an updated schedule . such groups are identified via recently added or dropped resource consumptions to / from one of their member resource spreaders i.e. , @xmath72 . in _ step 5 _ , the scheduling logic is invoked for each of the filtered groups . during this step , it should assign the @xmath34 values for all resource consumptions that are currently taking place in a given influence group . with these assignments , the simulator calculates the earliest completion time of the currently managed resource consumptions . then , in _ step 6 _ , it subscribes to a notification from the event system in order to know when the next resource consumption will be removed from the filtered influence groups . in the following phase , the simulator handles the resource consumptions this phase is either done when the event system delivers the notification on a resource consumption completion ( see _ step 7 _ ) or alternatively upon the registration of a new resource consumption . in the second case , the resource consumption handling is automatically executed before influence groups are calculated ( i.e. , steps _ 8 - 12 _ could precede _ step 4 _ of the preparation phase if a resource consumption is registered at a resource spreader that has already had some prior resource consumptions ) . in practice , _ steps 8 - 9 _ evaluate eq . [ eq - prov - update ] and _ steps 10 - 11 _ evaluate eq . [ eq - cons - update ] for all simultaneously existing resource consumptions @xmath73 in the simulator . resource consumptions e.g. , @xmath74 are automatically marked for removal when they reach their completion i.e. , @xmath75 . as a final step for resource consumption handling , the scheduler base checks for resource consumptions marked for removal ( see _ step 12 _ ) and on all marked resource consumptions it executes the completion phase . in the final phase , the resource consumption s completion is simulated . consumptions can be considered complete in two cases : either they have no further processing to be done or they were cancelled by the entity using the resource sharing mechanism . the scheduler base notifies this entity in both cases see _ step 13_. then it checks if it has finished all the current resource consumptions if there are still further resource consumptions to process , then the scheduler base resumes operations from _ step 4 _ , otherwise it cancels further notifications from the event system . as can be seen , the simulator expects scheduling logic implementations to utilise a fairly narrow and well - defined interface with the scheduler base . through this interface the simulator ensures that whenever a new schedule is needed ( i.e. , new @xmath34 values ) , the simulation developer provided scheduling logic is always called . dissect - cf also provides two sample implementations for this scheduling logic : a max min fairness algorithm @xcite implementation with progressive filling , and a simple logic that does not deal with complex bottleneck situations but demonstrates the interfaces with the scheduler base . compared to other recently developed simulators , dissect - cf completely decouples energy modelling from resource simulation in order to allow accounting for such energy consumptions that are not in direct relation to the resource utilisation of data centres . with this approach , a more comprehensive energy and power modelling is achievable that enables the analysis of new sophisticated energy aware algorithms in the areas of virtual machine placement , task scheduling , etc . these algorithms previously were frequently limited because energy readings from heating , ventilation and air conditioning ( hvac ) units or higher - level iaas components ( like vm schedulers or iaas interfaces ) were scarcely available in past simulators . thus , this section presents how energy consumption related information is collected and accumulated so they can support future algorithms . later , section [ sec - hls ] discusses the foundations for physical machine schedulers that are expected to be the primary users of the models overviewed in this section . first , in order to enable the decoupling , dissect - cf offers _ resource utilisation counters _ both for producers and consumers . these counters allow an aggregated and time dependent view of the consumption of particular resources . counters are updated depending on the ` power state ` of a resource spreader ( see figure [ fig - arch ] ) . for example , a physical machine @xmath77 in suspend to ram ( str ) power state zeroes its processing power : @xmath78 the power states of the various entities in the simulation can be defined as needed ; the simulator only expects these states to define the basic power characteristics ( e.g. , minimum and maximum power draw ) and the resource processing behaviour of the given entity at the specific state . the simulator also provides a basic set of power states ( on , off , turning on , turning off ) for which the resource processing behaviour is already defined for the resources incorporated into a physical machine . based on this low - level power modelling functionality , the decoupling of energy models is accomplished through ` energy meter`s . these meters are organised around four functionalities : @xmath0 monitoring of energy consumption directly related to resource utilisation , @xmath1 indirect energy consumption estimation , @xmath2 aggregation of metering results from multiple meters and @xmath79 presenting up - to - date energy readings to their users . the remainder of this subsection reveals how these functions accomplish the decoupling and shows the ways customised , infrastructure specific metering can be achieved in dissect - cf . ] [ [ direct - resource - utilisation - related - energy - consumption - metering ] ] direct resource utilisation related energy consumption metering + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + based on the previously mentioned resource utilisation counters , the simulator can be requested to periodically evaluate the instantaneous utilisation percentage . then , energy ` consumption model`s use these percentages ( see figure [ fig - arch ] ) to estimate the instantaneous power draw of each monitored resource spreader ( later the resulting estimate and the metering period is used to calculate the direct meter s energy consumption estimate ) . consumption models are dependent on the actual power state a resource spreader is in , and the simulator developer can define them . as examples , the simulator provides two simple energy consumption model implementations : @xmath0 a linear interpolation between minimum and maximum power draw depending on current resource utilisation , to allow basic modelling of dynamic power behaviour or @xmath1 a constant minimum power draw , to allow the effortless modelling of _ off _ or _ str _ power states . figure [ fig - meters ] presents direct meters for each resource spreader in the shown physical machines . [ [ indirect - energy - consumption - estimation ] ] indirect energy consumption estimation + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + to support more complex energy consumption estimates , the simulator also allows energy consumption to be derived from other properties of the simulated system . for example , these properties could include the virtual machine request rate of a particular data centre , or the utilisation of the data centre level storage subsystem ( e.g. , to estimate how many disk drives the currently stored data can occupy ) . these meters are expected to periodically evaluate the system state and accumulate their energy consumption estimates for those components of the simulated system that are not directly represented with resource spreaders . figure [ fig - meters ] reveals two indirect metering solutions to represent the internal actions of iaas systems and the energy consumption behaviour of data centre level hvac systems . [ [ meter - aggregators ] ] meter aggregators + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + in several cases , the energy consumption values from individual direct or indirect meters are not sufficient for higher - level energy aware decision makers ( e.g. , physical machine state schedulers see section [ sec - schedulers ] ) . for example , a physical machine in dissect - cf is represented with multiple resource spreaders ( e.g. , cpu , disk bandwidth ) , thus to have a complete view of a physical machine s energy consumption , one would need to monitor several direct energy meters . meter aggregators allow the automated collection and management of several meters in parallel and provide the higher - level view expected by decision makers . figure [ fig - meters ] shows a complex scenario for the use of aggregators . this scenario shows that a single aggregated meter can be constructed for a whole data centre , allowing even the inclusion of indirect metering results such as hvac . the figure also shows how a physical machine s resource spreader set can be metered as a single entity . as the estimation of energy consumption of the simulated entities might be time consuming , the simulator allows simulation developers to fragment and focus their measurements on those parts of the simulated systems that they are interested in . for instance , the simulation developers might be only interested in the energy consumption of a single virtual machine that is deployed on a simulated cloud with multiple data centres . in such cases , dissect - cf can limit the number of energy meters that are evaluated with two approaches : independent meters or adjusted aggregations . [ [ independent - meters ] ] independent meters + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + this approach entails that metering results are only dependent on the metered component and the rest of the simulated system can not influence them . e.g. , the energy consumption reported for a cpu level resource spreader of a physical machine should not be dependent on the behaviour of the rest of the system . [ [ adjusted - aggregations ] ] adjusted aggregations + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + if there is a dependency between two metered components ( e.g. , a virtual machine that is hosted on a particular physical machine ) , then a special meter aggregator can be created . this meter aggregator will not just add the aggregated meters measurements . instead it allows simulation developers to define an aggregation function . dissect - cf uses the adjusted aggregation technique to handle derived energy consumptions such as vm level energy consumption . for example , when applying the linear interpolation based energy consumption model , virtual machine level power draw can be calculated using the power draw of the hosting physical machine , as follows : @xmath80 where @xmath81 is the derived instantaneous power draw of a particular vm while it is running . the equation s first part estimates the variable part of the power draw , while the second part provides an estimate for the idle part . the variable part is dependent on @xmath82 , which is the maximum variability of the physical machine s power draw . the variable part is proportional to @xmath82 , depending on the resource utilisation of the particular vm compared to the resource utilisation of all vms hosted on the same physical machine . the second part of the estimate is the idle part that is derived from the idle power draw of the physical machine @xmath83 . this part is proportional to the number of vms hosted by the physical machine at the given time instance ( this number is one less than the cardinality of the vm s influence group because the group contains also the resource spreader of its hosting physical machine ) . [ eq - powermodel ] reveals that the energy consumption model ( that estimates the instantaneous power draw ) of the virtual machine is not independent from the physical machine s behaviour . therefore , energy consumption can not be directly accounted to virtual machines . when such meters are requested , the simulator identifies them as dependent meters and instead of creating independent meters , it creates an adjusted meter aggregator including those meters that could provide the necessary information to calculate the energy consumption to be attributed to the originally requested meter . it must be noted that dependent meters consider energy consumptions multiple times ( e.g. , energy consumption is accounted to both physical and virtual machines ) . thus when meter aggregations are created they must only include meters that are not dependent on each other . to allow the simplified development of new vm placement algorithms and pm state schedulers , dissect - cf provides an implementation of relevant infrastructure components in iaas systems . these components are built on top of the previously discussed resource sharing and energy modelling techniques and provide abstractions for networked entities and for physical / virtual machines ( see figure [ fig - arch ] ) . network activities rarely play a role in scheduling decisions related to tasks or to physical / virtual machines . thus , to increase the performance of simulations , by default , dissect - cf offers a limited network model where two networked entities must be always directly connected ( therefore connection properties like bandwidth must be defined between all networked entities that should be able to communicate with each other in the simulation ) . this rudimentary behaviour could be sufficient even for some network aware schedulers , but to allow better representation of real networks , the simulator also allows the creation of intermediary network entities ( such as routers ) . the implementation of such entities should alter the processing limit ( @xmath84 ) of all resource consumptions that are directed through them . directly connected networked entities ( @xmath85 , where @xmath86 is the set of all possible networking entities ) are simulated with the ` networknode ` component . this component encapsulates an incoming and an outgoing network connection simulated with the unified resource sharing foundation ; thus connections are implemented as resource spreaders : @xmath87 , where @xmath88 . the processing power of these spreaders represents the network bandwidth ( either incoming or outgoing ) of the given network node . when a new network communication must take place , simulation developers are expected to request a resource consumption between the source network node s outgoing resource spreader and the target s incoming resource spreader . the component also introduces network latencies ( @xmath89 ) that can be defined between every networked entity for any given time instance . the latency values resulting from this function are used as delays preceding the registration of each resource consumption to the incoming or outgoing resource spreader of the node . for example , let us see what happens if a network communication ( represented as a resource consumption @xmath90 ) needs to be registered between a source and a target networked entity ( @xmath91 ) at the time instance @xmath92 : @xmath93 where @xmath94 is the network latency between the source and target nodes at the time of registration ( @xmath95 ) , and @xmath96 is the nonperforming spreader that never processes any resource consumption : @xmath97 . thus the equation shows , that the consumption is registered to the nonperforming spreader for the complete period of the latency , afterwards the simulator switches the consumption s registration to the originally designated spreaders ( which are the network output port @xmath98 of the source node @xmath99 and the input port @xmath100 of the target node @xmath101 ) . this last step allows the simulator to utilise its unified resource sharing mechanism after the latency period is over . in iaas systems , physical machines offer most of the user exploited simulated resources . thus , dissect - cf ` physical ` ` machine`s encapsulate a diverse set of resources : local disks ( via repositories see section [ sec - ui ] ) , network interfaces ( with the help of network nodes see section [ sec - nw ] ) , cpus ( using the unified resource sharing model of section [ sec - ursm ] ) and memory . besides the modelling of these resources , dissect - cf s physical machine behaviour also focuses on two additional functionalities : administering resource allocations and vm requests ; and modelling physical machine level power behaviour . as resource sharing and modelling has already been discussed in detail , this subsection mainly discusses the latter functionalities . [ [ resource - allocator - and - vm - request - handler ] ] resource allocator and vm request handler + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + in order to maintain up - to - date information on the available and utilised resources of the physical machine , dissect - cf applies a resource allocator . the applied allocator can reserve resources ( e.g. , a given amount of memory or number of cpu cores ) from the physical machine . these reservations are represented as ` resource ` ` allocation ` instances that are used to maintain the free resource set of the physical machine . allocation instances are also passed as a token of resource availability towards virtual machine schedulers . other than the amount of resources associated with them , resource allocations also have the following properties : expiry time if unused or a link to the vm that uses it . when a resource allocation is created , the physical machine automatically initiates a ` deferredevent ` , which automatically cancels the allocation after the expiry time . to avoid this mechanism , the entity that requested the allocation must request a vm to use the reserved resources ( i.e. , establishing the link between the vm and the allocation ) . the automatic cancellation of the resource allocation is a self - defence mechanism of physical machines to avoid keeping resources out of use just because they received an unused allocation . for a single vm request , dissect - cf allows multiple ` resource ` ` allocation`s to be made across multiple physical machines . the multi - allocation technique can be used by schedulers to optimise for non - functional properties ( e.g. , past availability , expected energy consumption , environmental impact ) of those resources that a vm could bind to at a given moment . after a decision is made about the use of a particular allocation for the vm request , the rest of the allocations ( which were non optimal according to the non - functional requirements ) are expected to be cancelled by the schedulers . for complex vm instantiation scenarios , schedulers are also allowed to adjust the expiration time upon allocation request . with this mechanism , researchers can evaluate advanced reservation - like scenarios regarding vm instances . [ [ power - behaviour ] ] power behaviour + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + as dissect - cf aims at supporting the development of energy aware scheduling strategies in iaas clouds , the energy model of the physical machine is particularly important . in its default configuration , the simulator supports 4 power states ( and the transitions between them ) : off , switching on , running and switching off . although this power state set is fairly limited , the simulator already offers constructs that allow the modelling of more complex operations like : suspend to ram , suspend to disk , dynamic voltage & frequency scaling or core / cpu de- and reactivation . suspension related states can be modelled with the introduction of new power states , while the latter two are available because resource spreaders can alter their maximum processing capabilities . the modelling of the 4 supported states was done after real - life physical machine behaviour in the clouds of the university of innsbruck and mta sztaki . the real - life behaviour of the machines was observed through constantly monitoring their instantaneous power draw while they went through the following cycle : idling @xmath102 shutdown @xmath102 off @xmath102 switch on @xmath102 idling @xmath102 full cpu load . a sample measurement with a typical cloud node at innsbruck ( with 80 cpu cores , 128 gb ssd , 132 gb ram , and redundant power supplies ) can be seen in figure [ fig - pmbehaviour ] . as physical machine state schedulers can be highly influenced by the behaviour in non - running states ( e.g. , their decision on shutting off a machine could be dependent on the time it takes to boot the machine back and the expected power savings because of the completely off machine ) , dissect - cf offers a simplified and a more complex behaviour model . .simplified power state definition of a physical machine[tab - simpli ] [ cols="<,<,<,<,<",options="header " , ] during the performance evaluation , all parallel tasks of the trace started up in the first 10 seconds ( _ task spread _ ) and had a length variety between 10 - 90 seconds . the necessary amount of tasks for the 10-second - long simulation runtime is shown in table [ tab - taskdistrs ] . each evaluation was ran with different parallel task numbers between ( 1 - 100,000 ) to allow the investigation on how the increasing parallelism changed the performance of the simulators . the findings are shown in figure [ fig - pjruntime ] . as the figure shows , in the case of cloudsim , both its time - shared and space - shared vm scheduler was experimented on . the time - shared scheduler of cloudsim simulates parallelism , while the space - shared scheduler serialises the arrived tasks so at any given time there is only one task that can utilise the cpu , and the rest are queued until this task is finished . unfortunately , the time - shared scheduling mechanism of cloudsim is broken ; it lengthens task execution times significantly even in the case of a two - parallel - task setup ( e.g. , a simple setup like the one presented in figure [ fig - incpartask ] leads to completely different results than one would see in real - life ) on the other hand , the space - shared scheduler provides completely different task completion times ( because of its serialising behaviour ) . thus the cloudsim related details of the figure are only valid when considering their simulation runtime ; the simulated tasks do not finish at the expected times in either case . as depicted in the figure , cloudsim - time - shared and groudsim measurements abruptly finish at 1,000 and 50,000 tasks . for higher levels of parallelism , the runtime of the simulation took more than 8 hours and therefore was cancelled . in the case of cloudsim , the performance penalties mainly originate from its centralised design of data centres ( i.e. , most of the logic and event processing reside in the ` datacenter ` class , and the rest of cloudsim s classes are used for state representation only ) . groudsim , on the other hand , has a different design issue : it pre calculates all task completion times , puts them into the event queue and thus if a change is needed to them , the whole event queue has to be updated . finally , for all simulators , the task processing performance shown in the figure is expected to be faster than what one usually would see , because of the large amount of tasks that were executed for gathering data for the figure . the amount of repeated evaluations allowed the jvm to optimise the runtime behaviour of each simulator for the particular performance evaluation scenario . later on this effect is excluded from the evaluations . [ [ performance - influence - of - load - characteristics ] ] performance influence of load characteristics + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + the rest of this sub - section analyses of how the performance of the resource sharing varies depending on changes in task arrival and length characteristics . for this analysis , a baseline measurement was collected with no parallel tasks but varying task lengths . than the assumption was made that from this baseline , the simulators would linearly degrade in performance ( i.e. , two times the parallelism would increase the simulation run time of a single task by two times ) . to compare how linearly a particular simulator behaves under particular load characteristics , the following scaling ratio function was designed : @xmath103 where @xmath104 is the scaling ratio , @xmath105 is the kind of simulator , @xmath106 is the chosen range of task length variety ( in the below detailed experiments it was either 10 - 90 s or 200 - 3600 s ) , @xmath107 is the number of parallel tasks , @xmath108 is the task spread ( in particular , 10 s or 200 s were used ) , and @xmath109 is the measurement function that evaluates the particular simulator with the given load characteristics . figure [ fig - jobscalingcompare ] compares dissect - cf with the two selected simulators via the scaling ratio function . the labels of the figure are presented in the following format : @xmath110 ( see eq . [ eq - scratio ] ) , where @xmath105 is one of ds / gs / cs , which translate to dissect - cf / groudsim / cloudsim , respectively . the x - axis of the figure shows the increase in @xmath107 . based on the distribution of the measured scaling values for the different load characteristics , the most tolerant to the change in workload is groudsim , while the least tolerant is cloudsim . degrading performance in scaling can be also observed for both cloudsim and groudsim . in the case of cloudsim , the degradation starts around 10 parallel tasks , and by the time the simulation reaches 50 parallel tasks the simulator becomes worse than linear ( @xmath111 ) . in the case of groudsim , the degradation starts around 100 parallel tasks , and becomes worse than linear around 20,000 parallel tasks . in both cases the early degradation is caused by the data structures and the indirect call structures used ( i.e. often these simulators experience rather deep call stacks during parallel event handling ) . finally , although it is not visible in this chart , the degradation starts for dissect - cf at around 10,000 parallel tasks , and based on estimates , its scaling becomes worse than linear around 1.5 million parallel tasks . fortunately , this huge amount of parallelism is unlikely for most simulations . but simulations of some highly under - provisioned systems might need levels of parallelism that could lead to degraded performance even in groudsim . the figure also reveals that the performance of dissect - cf is more dependent on the task spread , while cloudsim s scaling is limited more by the task length variety . in case of dissect - cf , the task spread dependency manifests because the simulator executes its resource sharing mechanism only once per @xmath12 , on new resource consumption arrivals and departures ( see figure [ fig - rs ] for details ) . however , the increased task spread decreases the likelihood that the resource sharing mechanism can be executed on multiple resource consumptions at once . therefore , the wider the spread the closer one gets to the worst possible resource sharing performance in dissect - cf . in fact , the 200 s long spread was used because this spread is already high enough to reveal close - to - worst - case performance . increasing the spread further did not introduce significant resource sharing performance drops , but its impact on cloudsim based simulations rendered the evaluation of the 1,000 parallel task experiment too time consuming . as synthetic loads often criticised because of their possible bias , dissect - cf was evaluated and compared using workloads that were collected from real - life computing infrastructures . thus , the evaluation required workload traces with the following characteristics : @xmath0 collected for extensive periods of time ( i.e. , at least a few months long ) to ensure the widest variety of observable load characteristics for the particular infrastructure ; @xmath1 tasks should be described in detail including their resource utilisation and submission , start and completion times ( so even if just task definitions are available , one can still translate them to the kinds of virtual machines the tasks would need for their execution in a cloud environment ) ; and @xmath2 if the traces contain virtual machine management logs , then task allocation details are also necessary to enable the analysis of new scheduling techniques that might aim at reallocating tasks or that would change vm management operations . based on these requirements , most of the traces ( e.g. , planetlab ) containing virtual machine management logs were not found suitable for the planned comparative study ; the rest of these log based traces are not collected for enough time to be used in large scale experiments . thus , although these virtual machine management log based traces would be the best candidates for analysing cloud characteristics , their immaturity necessitates to also search amongst traces collected from other large - scale infrastructures like grids . two appropriate sources were identified : the grid workloads archive ( gwa @xcite ) and the parallel workloads archive . because both at the university of innsbruck and in mta sztaki , there are earlier good experiences with the processing of gwa traces , this article presents a comparative study of the three selected simulators through the traces downloadable from gwa ( namely : das2 , grid5000 , nordugrid , auvergrid , sharcnet , lcg ) . [ [ trace - processing ] ] trace processing + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + a trace loader was prepared for all three simulators so events were fired every time a task arrives . every time a new task arrival event is fired , the simulators are programmed to create a virtual machine that will host the task . once the vm was created the task was instantiated in it according to its definition in the trace file . when the task was completed according to the particular simulator , its hosting vm was also terminated . because of the known problems with the time - sharing mechanism in cloudsim , single vms did not receive parallel tasks ( e.g. , by requesting a vm that is sized to host multiple tasks first ) . instead , when parallel tasks were needed , multiple vms were created in the simulated cloud infrastructure . unfortunately , because of a few conceptual differences between dissect - cf and the other analysed simulators , the above - mentioned trace processing technique has several minor differences in their adaptations to the various simulators . first of all , dissect - cf has a queuing first - fit vm scheduler ( see section [ sec - hls ] ) that allows users to send vm requests right upon task arrival and wait for the vm scheduler s queuing mechanism to notify them about the vm s running state ( and readiness to receive the task ) . unfortunately , the rest of the simulators do not offer vm request queuing : they reject vm requests that can not be hosted according to the actual state of the simulated infrastructure . to have a similar behaviour to dissect - cf , either the vm request needs to be resent until it can be fulfilled ( which would introduce an unwanted busy waiting loop ) , or alternatively one must rely on user - side information . if the vm request is repeatedly resent , then the other simulators are significantly disadvantaged . thus , the second approach was used : previously non - servable vms were only re - requested once one of the previous vms have terminated ( i.e. , it was assumed that one can determine the state of all the running vms at a given time instance ) . with this technique the cpu share of the performance evaluation code ( as measured by java s embedded cpu sampler ) was kept around the same levels as it was for dissect - cf . tasks , which are utilising several cpu cores in parallel , are modelled in two ways . first , the simulation tries to request a vm with as many cpu cores as the task needs . unfortunately , this can not be achieved in cases when even the biggest possible vm is too small for the task s needs . for these huge tasks , the simulation requests multiple vms , enough to fulfil the parallelism in the task . in groudsim and dissect - cf it is possible to request multiple vm instances at once ( e.g. , similarly to how amazon ec2 behaves ) and they will be ensured to be available in parallel . on the other hand , cloudsim does not have such functionality ; therefore it was extended with a technique that only submits the tasks to their virtual machines once all necessary vms are available for the level of parallelism needed for the task . as groudsim is more focused on the user - side behaviour of cloud infrastructures , it has several deficiencies compared to the other two evaluated simulators : @xmath0 it can only handle tasks that occupy a single cpu core , @xmath1 its network sharing mechanism could result in network under utilisation if the communicating parties are using connections with different bandwidths and @xmath2 it does not provide data centre level simulation details e.g. , no vm / pm scheduling and pm level resource sharing is simulated . to overcome the first deficiency , multi - core tasks are simulated as several single core tasks in the same groudsim virtual machine . to avoid the problem with network sharing , the simulated data centres in all three simulators were constructed on such a way that every node was connected with the same bandwidth to the others . unfortunately , without significantly changing groudsim s code it was not possible to add the missing data centre level simulation details . thus , during the performance analysis one should keep in mind that these details are not simulated in groudsim . finally , for both groudsim and cloudsim , the instantiation time of a virtual machine is instantaneous , which is not realistic . as the transfer of the vm image is often the most time consuming operation in the vm instantiation procedure @xcite , this transfer was simulated with a download operation to the vm with both of the simulators . in groudsim , a network transfer was initiated right after the vm was created and this transfer delayed the creation of the task on the vm until the transfer s completion . in cloudsim , cloudlets ( computing tasks in cloudsim terminology ) could have input files defined for them . thus , tasks in cloudsim were specified so they must transfer an input file with the size of the vm image before they can start their processing . unfortunately , even with input files specified , the vms in cloudsim start immediately and execute their tasks right after the vm is created . this means that cloudsim based simulations can not be as accurate as the other two simulator s results . in order to reduce the impact of vm image transfer on task execution times and to allow all three simulations to have a similar simulation completion time , the size of the vm image was set to 100 mb ( which is the size of a rather small image nowadays ) . [ [ the - simulated - virtual - infrastructure ] ] the simulated virtual infrastructure + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + in all three simulators , a single kind of physical machine acted as the foundation of the simulated infrastructure . this physical machine was modelled after a single node in mta sztaki s cloud and had the following properties : @xmath0 64 cpu cores , @xmath1 256 gb ram , @xmath2 5 tb local disk , and @xmath79 two 1 gb / s ethernet connection . in the experiments detailed below , it was possible to define how many of these machines should be in the data centre . the set up of the machines includes the creation of a network interconnecting all of them with a central switch . [ [ the - runtime - comparison - experiment ] ] the runtime comparison experiment + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + for the first experiment the simulated infrastructure was set up so it was sufficient to host even the largest parallelism a single task of the traces could request ( i.e. , no task has had to be dropped because there were not enough physical machines to host its level of parallelism ) . in particular , this experiment required the simulation of 20 physical machines with the above - mentioned properties . on this infrastructure , the first @xmath112 tasks from a particular trace were submitted . then , a measurement was initiated for the real time passed between the submission of the first task and the completion of the last one . the infrastructure preparation , task submission and time measurement operations were repeated 10 times , each time starting with a new jvm . then , the trace specific average simulation duration for the measurement of @xmath113 tasks was calculated . afterwards , the whole measurement procedure was repeated for the remaining traces . finally , the _ aggregated simulation duration _ was calculated for @xmath113 tasks by averaging the trace specific averages from all traces . later , the aggregated simulation duration is referred as @xmath114 ( where @xmath105 is the measured simulator , @xmath107 is the number of tasks , @xmath115 is the number of physical machines to simulate and @xmath116 ) . figure [ fig - runtimecompare ] presents these aggregated simulation durations while the number of tasks @xmath107 were changed from a hundred to a million . as the measurements ran with a cold jvm , for the first 10,000 tasks one can see that the jvm s effects on the start - up dominate the runtimes . the first workload related differences of the simulators can be seen after the jvm s behaviour is no longer a significant contributor to the measurement . also , despite dissect - cf s focus on the internals of the infrastructure , its performance is always better than that of the other two simulators . this is especially apparent after around 200,000 tasks . in spite of groudsim doing the lightest - weight simulation ( see the deficiencies listed in the previous paragraphs ) , it is still significantly and consistently slower ( albeit in some cases like the lcg trace groudsim performs consistently better ) . the figure also shows that groudsim s network simulation code gives around 21% overhead for lower task counts , and for higher task counts the overhead could grow as high as 109% . this difference experienced during the network simulation is caused by groudsim s sub - par network modelling ( i.e. , for a single transfer to occur there are several events that needs to be handled in the event system , and in case of parallel transfers these events must be refreshed in the future event queue ) . [ [ the - scalability - experiment ] ] the scalability experiment + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + to determine the scalability of the compared simulators , the previous experiment was repeated with varying sizes of infrastructure under them . thus , these experiments will not only be able to pinpoint how the various simulators deal with the increasing amounts of tasks and virtual machines , but also how the simulators cope with increasing size of infrastructures . infrastructures as small as a single physical machine were used but the experiments were reaching to the size of 500 machines . as even smaller infrastructures were evaluated than 20 machines ( which was the minimum for the level of parallelism found in some of the traces ) , there were tasks that could not fit to the infrastructures . these tasks were automatically filtered out by the trace processor and never reached the simulation . interestingly , even with the simulation with a single machine the filtered out tasks were never more than 6% of the total number of tasks in any of the traces . of course , the single machine still caused a significant serialising effect that lengthened the total execution time of the rest of the tasks . similarly to eq . [ eq - scratio ] , the scalability of the simulators was calculated compared to linear scaling . figure [ fig - scalingcompare ] presents how the various simulators scale under a particular number of physical machines . the figure is composed of twelve sub - charts , each delimited with a black line . between the black lines a large bidirectional arrow contains the title of a sub - chart . the title shows the number of tasks for which the final runtime measurement values were compared . for example : the title `` _ _ 100 - 200 tasks _ _ '' means the sub - chart shows how the final runtime measurement value of 200 tasks compares to the value of 100 tasks . the comparison is made according to the following equation : @xmath117 where @xmath118 , @xmath119 is the number of tasks for which the aggregated simulation duration is evaluated , @xmath105 is one of the evaluated simulators and @xmath115 is the physical machine count . thus , @xmath120 will become one if the particular simulator scales linearly in the task number range of @xmath118 and @xmath119 . if the scaling function above is lower than one then the particular simulator is worse than linear . according to the sub - charts in figure [ fig - scalingcompare ] all simulators scale significantly better than linear with fewer than 10,000 tasks ( again , this is mostly due to the jvm s class loading and start - up mechanism , since practically all measurements under this task count result in sub - second runtimes ) . afterwards , one can see that cloudsim is already scaling significantly worse than the other two investigated simulators , and by 50,000 tasks cloudsim already drops below linear scaling . it can be also observed that simulators handle the number of parallel machines completely differently . in the case of cloudsim , the bigger the machine number , the more likely that the scaling factor will become lower . in the case of groudsim , the opposite behaviour is observed ; while for dissect - cf , one can see a rather balanced case . in conclusion , groudsim behaves as expected : the missing simulation of physical machine behaviour and vm / pm scheduling techniques allows it to behave practically independently from infrastructure size . in this sense , cloudsim and dissect - cf should behave more closely to each other . unfortunately , the problematic implementation of cloudsim s time - shared vm scheduler ( see section [ sec - syntheval ] ) changes its apparent behaviour and reduces the similarities in the trends between dissect - cf and cloudsim . to conclude , dissect - cf scales comparably to other state - of - the - art simulators ( in fact it never drops below linear scaling , in contrast to the others ) while it offers significantly more detailed infrastructure level behaviour . this experiment was also used to _ validate the results of dissect - cf _ through a comparison with the other simulators . as the first step of validation , the simulator reported completion time of the last task in every trace specific measurement was collected ( from @xmath114 where @xmath107 was set between one and a million , and @xmath115 between one and five hundred ) . then , these task completion times were compared with each other . the median of the difference between the simulators was less than 0.001% ( the average difference from the median was 2.15% ) . the biggest differences occurred with simulated infrastructures containing the lowest number of physical machines : in such cases the median of difference between the simulators jumped to a little more than 0.29% ( with a sample standard deviation of 7.21% ) . the reason behind such a great deviation is the magnified effect of virtual machine instantiation simulation ( i.e. , as vms can only be instantiated on a single pm , they are mostly created and destroyed in a serial fashion ) . [ [ the - impact - of - energy - metering ] ] the impact of energy metering + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + so far , all presented measurements were executed without energy meters attached to the resource spreaders of dissect - cf . as energy metering is not available in groudsim , the other two simulators would have suffered a disadvantage because of their ongoing metering simulation . as dissect - cf was consequently a better performer than the other two simulators , its further evaluation was focused on how one could set up energy metering in order to get comparable performance to the other simulators meter - less operation . figure [ fig - energyperformancedrop ] analyses the performance drop of dissect - cf observed when energy metering was requested for the complete simulated infrastructure with 20 physical machines . just as before , the function @xmath121 was evaluated , but now instead of comparing dissect - cf to other simulators , the comparison was made between the newly received values to values from the previously presented simulations without energy metering . adding energy metering leads to significant performance differences between the various gwa traces . to show what is the possible performance degradation range in the various traces , the two extreme cases ( the best and worst performing ones ) are revealed in the figure . the presented cases show that selecting the energy measurement interval is crucial for well performing simulations . in general it is not recommended to use energy measurement intervals below one minute for long running simulations i.e. , where the trace s length is over a few thousand tasks . if higher precision is needed , then selective metering techniques should be used that evaluate energy meters for only the necessary parts of the infrastructure ; otherwise , one could experience a slowdown of over 50 times compared to meter - less runtimes . finally , in figure [ fig - energyequivalence ] , a comparison is shown about the performance drop caused by the metering to the meter - less setups of other simulators . the figure shows what the metering interval is despite the resulting performance drop that still provides equivalent performance to other simulators . as the figure shows , the performance drop also depends on the number of physical machines in the simulated infrastructure . overall , if energy metering is desired on the entire simulated infrastructure , the metering interval must be set to at least five - seconds to receive comparable performance to cloudsim . in contrast , groudsim s performance can be matched with a metering interval around 25 - 30 seconds . anything above these values will give a performance advantage to dissect - cf . on the other hand , metering intervals below these values could still cause a better performing dissect - cf but this is highly dependent on the particular trace or virtual machine request pattern used during simulations . this article outlined several iaas related schedulers that could be further improved with the use of cloud simulators . then , it has shown that current simulators barely meet the demands of the scheduling oriented researchers : @xmath0 they often limit the accessibility of information , @xmath1 they often hide the internal details of iaas systems , @xmath2 they frequently perform poorly in large - scale simulations , and @xmath79 they provide scarcely any options for introducing new energy management techniques inside iaas clouds . to overcome these issues , the article has proposed a new simulator called dissect - cf . the proposed simulator targets information accessibility issues with open apis and monitoring and performance related customisable events . the internal details of the cloud systems are also accessible , allowing simulation developers : @xmath0 to construct clouds in novel ways ( e.g. , introduction of new physical machine - virtual machine interaction techniques or cloud organisation topologies ) , and @xmath1 to experiment with new cloud side behaviour ( e.g. , new vm schedulers , power states ) . dissect - cf utilises a new unified resource sharing mechanism that allows centralised performance optimisations and ensures scaling independently of the size of the infrastructure and the amount of tasks processed by the simulated system . finally , the new simulator deeply integrates energy metering techniques ( ranging from resource usage counters and energy consumption models to meter aggregators ) . these techniques not only allow further extensions but they allow selective and composite power metering to ensure minimal performance drops during the metering sessions . the new simulator was evaluated by comparing it to small - scale but real - life environments . during this evaluation , it was presented how one should model cpu and memory intensive tasks , and it was also shown that the accuracy of the simulator s energy metering technique is also dependent on the new unified resource sharing mechanism . experiments shown that the relative error of the new resource sharing technique is around 1% in most cases . after the small - scale evaluation , dissect - cf was compared with two state - of - the - art simulators ( namely cloudsim and groudsim ) . the comparisons were focused on the scaling and performance characteristics of the simulators . the results revealed that these simulators often produce inaccurate results , while the new simulator not only provided more accurate outputs but also offered better performance . future research will consider several areas . first , there are plans to look how the simulator s resource sharing accuracy could be improved with stochastic sharing models and new low - level scheduling techniques . next , support for more complex network topologies and additional node types ( e.g. , routers and switches ) will also be prepared . as the current simulator merely provides raw data for user - side schedulers , an investigation of the necessary constructs and optimisations to better support the development and analysis of these schedulers also needs to be done . finally , memory behaviour is practically neglected in the current simulator , because applications and openly available traces do not offer any details on this . in the future , a task level complex memory model is expected to be delivered that not only considers memory bandwidth utilisation but also access patterns . with this model the simulator s target could include accurate live migration support . this article described the behaviour and features of dissect - cf version 0.9.5 . the source code of the simulator is open and available ( under the licensing terms of the gnu lesser general public license 3 ) at the following website : https://github.com/kecskemeti/dissect-cf . this work was partially supported by european union s horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement no 644179 ( entice ) as well as by the cost program action ic1305 : network for sustainable ultrascale computing ( nesus ) , finally the research has also received partial funding from the austrian science fund project trp 237-n23 . a. ahmed and a.s . cloud computing simulators : a detailed survey and future direction . in _ advance computing conference ( iacc ) , 2014 ieee international _ , pages 866872 . ieee , february 2014 . doi:10.1109/iadcc.2014.6779436 . w. zhao , y. peng , f. xie , z. dai , modeling and simulation of cloud computing : a review , in : ieee asia pacific cloud computing congress ( apcloudcc ) , ieee , shenzhen , 2012 , pp . 2024 . doi:10.1109/apcloudcc.2012.6486505 . t. hirofuchi , a. lbre , adding virtual machine abstractions into simgrid : a first step toward the simulation of infrastructure - as - a - service concerns , in : third international conference on cloud and green computing ( cgc ) , ieee , karlsruhe , germany , 2013 , pp . 175180 . doi:10.1109/cgc.2013.33 . a. nez , j. l. vzquez - poletti , a. c. caminero , j. carretero , i. m. llorente , design of a new cloud computing simulation platform , in : computational science and its applications - iccsa 2011 , vol . 6784 of lecture notes in computer science , springer , santander , spain , 2011 , pp . 582593 . doi:10.1007/978 - 3 - 642 - 21931 - 3_45 . k. kurowski , a. oleksiak , w. pikatek , t. piontek , a. przybyszewski , j. wkeglarz , dcworms a tool for simulation of energy efficiency in distributed computing infrastructures , simulation modelling practice and theory 39 ( 2013 ) 135151 . doi:10.1016/j.simpat.2013.08.007 . d. kliazovich , p. bouvry , y. audzevich , s. khan , greencloud : a packet - level simulator of energy - aware cloud computing data centers , in : global telecommunications conference ( globecom 2010 ) , 2010 , pp . 15 . doi:10.1109/glocom.2010.5683561 . r. n. calheiros , r. ranjan , a. beloglazov , c. a. de rose , r. buyya , cloudsim : a toolkit for modeling and simulation of cloud computing environments and evaluation of resource provisioning algorithms , software : practice and experience 41 ( 1 ) ( 2011 ) 2350 . doi:10.1002/spe.995 . s. ostermann , k. plankensteiner , r. prodan , t. fahringer , groudsim : an event - based simulation framework for computational grids and clouds , in : euro - par 2010 parallel processing workshops , vol . 6586 of lecture notes in computer science , springer , 2011 , pp . 305313 . doi:10.1007/978 - 3 - 642 - 21878 - 1_38 . velho , l. m. schnorr , h. casanova , a. legrand , on the validity of flow - level tcp network models for grid and cloud simulations , acm transactions on modeling and computer simulation ( tomacs ) 23 ( 4 ) ( 2013 ) 23 . doi:10.1145/2517448 . p. velho , a. legrand , accuracy study and improvement of network simulation in the simgrid framework , in : proceedings of the 2nd international conference on simulation tools and techniques , icst ( institute for computer sciences , social - informatics and telecommunications engineering ) , 2009 , p. 13 . doi:10.4108/icst.simutools2009.5592 . r. sobie , a. agarwal , i. gable , c. leavett - brown , m. paterson , r. taylor , a. charbonneau , r. impey , w. podiama , htc scientific computing in a distributed cloud environment , in : proceedings of the 4th acm workshop on scientific cloud computing , science cloud 13 , acm , new york , ny , usa , 2013 , pp . doi:10.1145/2465848.2465850 . h. song , j. li , x. liu , idlecached : an idle resource cached dynamic scheduling algorithm in cloud computing , in : 9th international conference on ubiquitous intelligence computing and 9th international conference on autonomic trusted computing ( uic / atc ) , 2012 , pp . 912917 . doi:10.1109/uic - atc.2012.24 . m. rodrguez , d. tapiador , j. fontn , e. huedo , r. montero , i. llorente , dynamic provisioning of virtual clusters for grid computing , in : e. csar , m. alexander , a. streit , j. trff , c. crin , a. knpfer , d. kranzlmller , s. jha ( eds . ) , euro - par 2008 workshops - parallel processing , vol . 5415 of lecture notes in computer science , springer berlin heidelberg , 2009 , pp . doi:10.1007/978 - 3 - 642 - 00955 - 6_4 . b. sotomayor , k. keahey , i. foster , combining batch execution and leasing using virtual machines , in : proceedings of the 17th international symposium on high performance distributed computing , hpdc 08 , acm , new york , ny , usa , 2008 , pp . doi:10.1145/1383422.1383434 . j. tordsson , r. s. montero , r. moreno - vozmediano , i. m. llorente , cloud brokering mechanisms for optimized placement of virtual machines across multiple providers , future generation computer systems 28 ( 2 ) ( 2012 ) 358 367 . doi:10.1016/j.future.2011.07.003 . e. elmroth , l. larsson , interfaces for placement , migration , and monitoring of virtual machines in federated clouds , in : eighth international conference on grid and cooperative computing . gcc 09 . , 2009 , doi:10.1109/gcc.2009.36 . k. tsakalozos , m. roussopoulos , a. delis , vm placement in non - homogeneous iaas - clouds , in : g. kappel , z. maamar , h. motahari - nezhad ( eds . ) , service - oriented computing , vol . 7084 of lecture notes in computer science , springer berlin heidelberg , 2011 , pp . 172187 . doi:10.1007/978 - 3 - 642 - 25535 - 9_12 . d. jayasinghe , c. pu , t. eilam , m. steinder , i. whally , e. snible , improving performance and availability of services hosted on iaas clouds with structural constraint - aware virtual machine placement , in : ieee international conference on services computing ( scc ) , 2011 , pp . doi:10.1109/scc.2011.28 . r. ghosh , v. naik , k. trivedi , power - performance trade - offs in iaas cloud : a scalable analytic approach , in : ieee / ifip 41st international conference on dependable systems and networks workshops ( dsn - w ) , 2011 , pp . doi:10.1109/dsnw.2011.5958802 . e. feller , c. rohr , d. margery , c. morin , energy management in iaas clouds : a holistic approach , in : ieee 5th international conference on cloud computing ( cloud ) , 2012 , pp . doi:10.1109/cloud.2012.50 . lizhe wang , samee u. khan , dan chen , joanna kolodziej , rajiv ranjan , cheng zhong xu , and albert zomaya . energy - aware parallel task scheduling in a cluster . , 29(7):1661 1670 , september 2013 . including special sections : cyber - enabled distributed computing for ubiquitous cloud and network services & amp ; cloud computing and scientific applications big data , scalable analytics , and beyond . doi:10.1016/j.future.2013.02.010 . d. ongaro , a. l. cox , s. rixner , scheduling i / o in virtual machine monitors , in : proceedings of the fourth acm sigplan / sigops international conference on virtual execution environments , vee 08 , acm , new york , ny , usa , 2008 , pp . doi:10.1145/1346256.1346258 . g. von laszewski , l. wang , a. younge , x. he , power - aware scheduling of virtual machines in dvfs - enabled clusters , in : ieee international conference on cluster computing and workshops . cluster 09 . , 2009 , pp . doi:10.1109/clustr.2009.5289182 . j. yang , x. zhou , m. chrobak , y. zhang , l. jin , dynamic thermal management through task scheduling , in : ieee international symposium on performance analysis of systems and software . ispass 2008 . , 2008 , pp . doi:10.1109/ispass.2008.4510751 . r. buyya , r. ranjan , r. n. calheiros , modeling and simulation of scalable cloud computing environments and the cloudsim toolkit : challenges and opportunities , in : international conference on high performance computing & simulation ( hpcs09 ) . , ieee , leipzig , 2009 , pp . doi:10.1109/hpcsim.2009.5192685 . r. buyya , m. murshed , gridsim : a toolkit for the modeling and simulation of distributed resource management and scheduling for grid computing , concurrency and computation : practice and experience 14 ( 13 - 15 ) ( 2002 ) 11751220 . doi:10.1002/cpe.710 . s. k. garg , r. buyya , networkcloudsim : modelling parallel applications in cloud simulations , in : fourth ieee international conference on utility and cloud computing ( ucc ) , ieee , victoria , nsw , 2011 , pp . doi:10.1109/ucc.2011.24 . a. beloglazov , r. buyya , optimal online deterministic algorithms and adaptive heuristics for energy and performance efficient dynamic consolidation of virtual machines in cloud data centers , concurrency and computation : practice and experience 24 ( 13 ) ( 2012 ) 13971420 . doi:10.1002/cpe.1867 . tom gurout , thierry monteil , georges da costa , rodrigo neves calheiros , rajkumar buyya , and mihai alexandru . energy - aware simulation with \{dvfs}. , 39:76 91 , december 2013 . energy efficiency in grids and clouds . doi:10.1016/j.simpat.2013.04.007 . x. li , x. jiang , p. huang , k. ye , dartcsim : an enhanced user - friendly cloud simulation system based on cloudsim with better performance , in : 2nd international conference on cloud computing and intelligent systems ( ccis ) , vol . 1 , ieee , hangzhou , 2012 , pp . 392396 . doi:10.1109/ccis.2012.6664434 . s. sotiriadis , n. bessis , n. antonopoulos , a. anjum , simic : designing a new inter - cloud simulation platform for integrating large - scale resource management , in : 27th international conference on advanced information networking and applications ( aina ) , 2013 , pp . doi:10.1109/aina.2013.123 . s. sotiriadis , n. bessis , n. antonopoulos , towards inter - cloud simulation performance analysis : exploring service - oriented benchmarks of clouds in simic , in : 27th international conference on advanced information networking and applications workshops ( waina ) , 2013 , pp . doi:10.1109/waina.2013.196 . y. shi , x. jiang , k. ye , an energy - efficient scheme for cloud resource provisioning based on cloudsim , in : ieee international conference on cluster computing ( cluster ) , ieee , austin , tx , 2011 , pp . doi:10.1109/cluster.2011.63 . alexandru - florian antonescu and torsten braun . sla - driven simulation of multi - tenant scalable cloud - distributed enterprise information systems . in florin pop and maria potop - butucaru , editors , _ adaptive resource management and scheduling for cloud computing _ , lecture notes in computer science , pages 91102 . springer international publishing , november 2014 . doi:10.1007/978 - 3 - 319 - 13464 - 2_7 . b. wickremasinghe , r. n. calheiros , r. buyya , cloudanalyst : a cloudsim - based visual modeller for analysing cloud computing environments and applications , in : 24th ieee international conference on advanced information networking and applications ( aina ) , ieee , 2010 , pp . doi:10.1109/aina.2010.32 . thiago teixeira s , rodrigo n. calheiros , and danielo g. gomes . . in zaigham mahmood , editor , _ cloud computing _ , computer communications and networks , pages 127142 . springer international publishing , october 2014 . doi:10.1007/978 - 3 - 319 - 10530 - 7_6 . h. casanova , simgrid : a toolkit for the simulation of application scheduling , in : first ieee / acm international symposium on cluster computing and the grid , ieee , brisbane , qld . , 2001 , pp . doi:10.1109/ccgrid.2001.923223 . t. hirofuchi , a. lbre , l. pouilloux , et al . , adding a live migration model into simgrid , one more step toward the simulation of infrastructure - as - a - service concerns , in : 5th ieee international conference on cloud computing technology and science ( ieee cloudcom ) , bristol , uk , 2013 , pp . 96103 . doi:10.1109/cloudcom.2013.20 . d. kliazovich , p. bouvry , s. u. khan , greencloud : a packet - level simulator of energy - aware cloud computing data centers , the journal of supercomputing 62 ( 3 ) ( 2012 ) 12631283 . doi:10.1007/s11227 - 010 - 0504 - 1 . a. nez , g. castane , j. vazquez - poletti , a. caminero , j. carretero , i. llorente , design of a flexible and scalable hypervisor module for simulating cloud computing environments , in : international symposium on performance evaluation of computer & telecommunication systems ( spects ) , ieee , 2011 , pp . 265270 . a. nez , j. l. vzquez - poletti , a. c. caminero , g. g. casta , j. carretero , i. m. llorente , icancloud : a flexible and scalable cloud infrastructure simulator , journal of grid computing 10 ( 1 ) ( 2012 ) 185209 . doi:10.1007/s10723 - 012 - 9208 - 5 . s. ostermann , k. plankensteiner , d. bodner , g. kraler , r. prodan , integration of an event - based simulation framework into a scientific workflow execution environment for grids and clouds , in : towards a service - based internet , vol . 6994 of lecture notes in computer science , springer , poznan , poland , 2011 , pp . 113 . doi:10.1007/978 - 3 - 642 - 24755 - 2_1 . i. sriram , speci , a simulation tool exploring cloud - scale data centres , in : cloud computing , vol . 5931 of lecture notes in computer science , springer , 2009 , pp . doi:10.1007/978 - 3 - 642 - 10665 - 1_35 . m. tighe , g. keller , m. bauer , h. lutfiyya , dcsim : a data centre simulation tool for evaluating dynamic virtualized resource management , in : 8th international conference on network and service management ( cnsm ) , ieee , 2012 , pp . 385392 . w. piatek , dcworms a tool for simulation of energy efficiency in data centers , in : energy efficiency in large scale distributed systems , vol . 8046 of lecture notes in computer science , springer , 2013 , pp . 118124 . doi:10.1007/978 - 3 - 642 - 40517 - 4_11 . m. tighe , g. keller , j. shamy , m. bauer , h. lutfiyya , towards an improved data centre simulation with dcsim , in : proceedings of the 9th international conference on network and service management , cnsm 2013 , ieee , zurich , switzerland , 2013 , pp . doi:10.1109/cnsm.2013.6727859 . g. kecskemeti , foundations of efficient virtual appliance based service deployments : new techniques for virtual appliance delivery and size optimization in infrastructure as a service clouds , isbn : 978 - 3 - 8484 - 0383 - 7 , lap lambert academic publishing , saarbrcken , 2012 . Abstract:

Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.

Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered . Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video . Paper: in the last few years , great progress has been made towards the understanding of the out of equilibrium dynamics of _ classical _ systems with slow dynamics and aging effects . experiments in several glassy materials such as polymer glasses,@xcite spin - glasses,@xcite orientational glasses,@xcite simple liquids like glycerol@xcite and gels , @xcite have shown that all these systems share an extremely slow dynamics at low temperatures . although some aspects of the dynamic evolution as the precise scaling laws or the dependence on cooling rates vary from system to system , all the examples mentioned above are characterized by the existence of a non - equilibrium low temperature phase with _ aging effects_. this means that measurements show a strong dependence upon the time elapsed since its preparation by a thermal quench or annealing from a high temperature phase . needless to say , the standard equilibrium approach is not suited to describe such a phenomenology . in order to describe the spin - glass case , a number of theoretical methods have been exploited , ranging from scaling arguments based on coarsening ideas;@xcite phenomenological models founded on particular assumptions on the structure of phase space;@xcite analytical solutions to models with infinite - range interactions;@xcite and numerical simulations of finite and infinite dimensional models.@xcite all of these approaches have succeeded in capturing some of the effects observed experimentally . importantly enough , the solution of simplified models with infinite range interactions has been fruitful for several reasons : ( i ) it has shown that indeed a large family of such models do capture aging effects that resemble , at least qualitatively , the experimental observations . ( ii ) it has provided a general framework to analyze the non - equilibrium dynamics with new predictions , like scaling laws for the time - delayed correlation function and asymptotic violations of the fluctuation - dissipation theorem , that are not restricted to the infinite dimensional case . some of these have been confirmed by numerical studies of more realistic models@xcite and will be probed experimentally soon.@xcite ( iii ) it has allowed to extend the _ connection@xcite between mean - field theories of disordered systems and the mode - coupling theory of super - cooled liquids@xcite to the low temperature glassy phase.@xcite this is most welcome since many of the similarities observed in the behavior of real glasses of very different origin can now be understood theoretically . ( iv ) problems of a more general nature such as the dynamics of manifolds in a random quenched environment , relevant to the description of e.g. the pinning of the flux lattice by disorder in dirty high @xmath1 superconductors,@xcite can be studied in a similar way.@xcite the dependence on the internal dimension of the manifold can be included in the formalism and the analysis yields , among other results , dynamic scaling laws for the displacements with aging effects . the studies we have mentioned so far are mostly concerned with the analysis of _ classical _ systems . this treatment is in general justified since , in many cases , the critical temperature at which the transition to the glassy phase " occurs is sufficiently high as to make quantum effects irrelevant . nevertheless , in many cases of practical interest , the critical temperature can be lowered by tuning an external parameter . experimental realizations of this situation are given by insulating magnetic materials@xcite such as liho@xmath2y@xmath3f@xmath4 and randomly mixed hydrogen - bonded ferro - antiferroelectric crystals of the rb@xmath3 ( nh@xmath4)@xmath5h@xmath6po@xmath4 type ( known as radp).@xcite theoretical studies addressing the effects of quantum fluctuations in disordered media have been considered over the last twenty years . a variety of techniques including replica theory,@xcite renormalization group@xcite and monte carlo simulations@xcite have been employed in order to understand the _ static _ properties and critical behavior of quantum systems such as quantum rotors@xcite , transverse field ising models in finite dimensions@xcite and mean - field systems like the sherrington - kirkpatrick model in a transverse field.@xcite from the study of _ classical _ glassy systems described in the first paragraph , one knows that at low temperatures their dynamics becomes so slow that the systems are not able to reach thermal equilibrium at any experimentally accessible time . the same occurs regarding numerical simulations of large systems . it is then plausible that even at very low temperatures , say @xmath7 , with only quantum fluctuations driving the dynamics , the materials and/or models will need an unaffordable long time to reach equilibrium and that the relevant evolution will be characterized by non - equilibrium effects . indeed , it is well - known that certain glasses in the limit of very low temperatures have aging effects@xcite and hence the approaches based on the assumption of equilibration have a restricted domain of application . instead , one should necessarily start from a quantum _ dynamic _ description in order to obtain sensible information about the systems . to the best of our knowledge this problem has not been theoretically tackled , from a microscopic point of view , yet . the question then arises as to how do quantum fluctuations modify the _ real time _ dynamics of glassy systems . in this paper , we treat the case of a disordered model in contact with a thermal quantum bath . our first aim is to present a general framework that allows us to study the real time dynamics of a system with quantum _ and _ thermal fluctuations starting from an arbitrary initial condition . in the case of classical models this is most easily done within the langevin approach . one generally starts by postulating that the dynamics of the microscopic variables is given by a stochastic langevin equation . the noise and friction terms account for the bath - system interaction . a path - integral formulation of the generating functional , known as the martin - siggia - rose formalism@xcite ( msr ) , yields an elegant and simple formulation which is particularly well suited for problems with disorder . however , the generalization of this procedure to the quantum case is far from being straightforward . the langevin equation does not seem to be a good starting point since , being phenomenological , it can not be quantized in an obvious way.@xcite in other words , it is not clear how to make the langevin approach compatible with the intrinsic microscopic dynamics of a quantum system . the approach we use here results from the combination of different techniques which have been intensively discussed in the literature and successfully applied to a wide range of phenomena . essentially , it consists of the schwinger and keldysh@xcite closed - time path - integral formalism applied to a system in contact with a thermal bath , combined with the integration of the bath variables leading to the feynman and vernon influence functional.@xcite a subsequent integration over the disorder gives the quantum analogue of the msr generating functional for disordered systems . though the formalism allows us to consider general cooling procedures or / and various temperature variations , we shall not study involved thermal histories here but concentrate instead on a quench from a configuration associated to the disordered phase . for the sake of definiteness we focus on a system whose classical counterpart , the so - called `` @xmath0-spin spherical spin - glass model '' , has been studied in great detail . this model is described by a potential energy @xmath8 = - \sum_{i_1 < \dots < i_p}^n j_{i_i\dots i_p } \ , \sigma_{i_1 } \dots \sigma_{i_p}\ ] ] with @xmath9 quenched independent gaussian variables and @xmath10 a parameter . let us attempt a short review of the behavior of the _ classical _ @xmath0-spin models . in its ising version it was first introduced by derrida in relation with the random energy model.@xcite several studies of its static properties , in particular using replicas , followed . @xcite kirkpatrick and thirumalai@xcite studied the equilibrium dynamics , la sompolinsky,@xcite and remarked that the dynamic equations , in the high temperature phase , are those appearing as @xmath11 models in the mode - coupling theory of super - cooled liquids developed to describe the glass transition.@xcite the spherical version , where a time - dependent lagrange multiplier is introduced to enforce the spherical constraint @xmath12 , was first studied by jones , kosterlitz and thouless@xcite for @xmath13 . its statics is fully solvable either by using replicas a replica symmetric ansatz is exact or through a direct calculation . its dynamics@xcite is also fully solvable and it renders explicit the fact that the model is formally related@xcite to the @xmath14 model in the large @xmath15 limit and dimension @xmath16 . in the classical limit , it is then a toy model for ferromagnetic domain - growth . in the quantum case one feels tempted to relate it to coarsening in quantum systems . the analysis of the spherical model for @xmath17 is due to crisanti and sommers,@xcite who also studied the equilibrium dynamics la sompolinsky in collaboration with horner.@xcite in the classical limit and at the static level , this model is the prototype spin - glass solved by a parisi one - step replica symmetric ansatz . still at the classical level and in the large @xmath15 limit , one derives exact evolution equations that exhibit a first order discontinuous dynamic transition at @xmath18 . above @xmath18 , as in the ising case , one recovers the mode - coupling equation for model @xmath11.@xcite below @xmath18 it is well - known that the dynamic approach used in ref.[@xcite ] is incorrect.@xcite the dynamics in the low - temperature phase was solved in ref . [ ] showing that the dynamics of mean - field spin - glasses strikingly resembles that of real systems . in the spin - glass phase the evolution is intrinsically out of equilibrium and the systems age in similar way to the one observed in experiments . in order to define the model at the quantum level , we need to specify the dynamics of the variables @xmath19 . for simplicity , we consider a kinetic term of the form @xmath20 where the dot denotes a time - derivative . calling @xmath21 the lagrange multiplier enforcing the spherical constraint , the model we here consider is then described by the action @xmath22 = \int dt \ , \left [ \frac{m}{2 } { \dot { \bbox \sigma}}^2 - \frac{z}{2 } \left ( { \bbox \sigma}^2 -n \right ) + \sum_{i_1 < \dots < i_p}^n j_{i_i\dots i_p } \ , \sigma_{i_1 } \dots \sigma_{i_p } \right ] \ ; .\ ] ] our main goals are to detect a dynamic transition from a disordered phase to an ordered glassy phase and to characterize the dynamics in these phases . with this purpose , we pay particular attention to the departure of correlation and response functions from stationarity and , we search for one of the hallmarks of a glassy phase , namely , violations of the fluctuation - dissipation theorem . we also intend to discuss our results in view of previous and possible experimental tests . the paper is organized as follows . in section [ ctp ] we discuss the closed - time path - integral formalism of keldysh and schwinger and the coupling of the quantum system to a quantum heat bath . we obtain a generating functional with an effective action that takes into account the effect of the coupling to the bath . in three appendices we give details of the keldysh schwinger formalism ( appendix [ appkeldysh ] ) , we recall the quantum fdt ( appendix [ appfdt ] ) and we discuss the classical limit ( appendix [ classicallimit ] ) . section [ meanfieldequations ] is devoted to the derivation of the dynamic equations through a saddle - point approximation of the generating functional . the method is similar to the one used in the classical case when manipulating the martin - siggia - rose generating functional . the general scenario for the real - time dynamics of this system is discussed in section [ scenario ] . it is inspired by the behavior of the classical counterpart but some generalizations are necessary . in section [ equilibriumdynamics ] the equations and their solution in the paramagnetic phase are studied with special emphasis set on the analysis of the out of phase susceptibility close to the transition line . in section [ nonequilibrium ] the dynamic equations in the glassy phase are studied . the non - equilibrium dynamics is shown to survive quantum fluctuations in a finite region of the phase diagram . further details of the approach to solve the equations are given in appendix [ integrals ] . the modification of fdt needed to construct an ansatz to solve these equations and its relation to effective temperatures are discussed in section [ generalfdt ] . finally , in section [ conclusions ] we present a summary of our results , our conclusions and some ideas as to how to continue investigating along the lines here proposed . a short account of some of these results has appeared in ref . the closed - time path - integral ( ctp ) formalism of keldysh and schwinger@xcite for treating the non - equilibrium dynamics of a quantum system has been reviewed several times in the literature . @xcite in order to set the notation we briefly present it in section [ generalframework ] . we then consider the situation in which the system under study is coupled to a quantum thermal bath and derive the effective action following feynman and vernon @xcite ( section [ couplingtoaheatbath ] ) . in section [ ctpfordisorderedsystems ] we finally address the case of a disordered system and we obtain the effective action from which the dynamic equations are derived in section [ meanfieldequations ] . the basic ingredient of this formulation is the `` in - in '' generating functional from which , after derivation with respect to the external sources @xmath23 , @xmath24 , the different green functions can be obtained . let us consider a model with degrees of freedom described by a field @xmath25 in the heisenberg picture . denoting @xmath26 the density matrix at the initial time @xmath27 ( which from now on we set to zero ) , the generating functional is defined as @xmath28 & = & \mbox{tr } \left[t^ * \exp\left(- \frac{i}{\hbar } \int_{0}^\infty dt \ , { \bbox \xi}^-(t ) { \bbox \phi}(t)\right ) t \exp\left ( \frac{i}{\hbar } \int_{0}^\infty dt \ , { \bbox \xi}^+(t ) { \bbox \phi}(t ) \right ) \hat\rho(0 ) \right ] \ ; \label{generating}\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath29 and @xmath30 are the @xmath15-vector external sources and a scalar product between @xmath15 vectors is assumed . the symbols @xmath31 and @xmath32 are the time and anti - time ordering operators : @xmath33 defining ensemble averages in the usual way @xmath34 one obtains @xmath35 which is directly related to the feynman causal propagator . in the same way , @xmath36 { \ln } { \cal z } \right|_{{\bbox \xi}=0 } \ ; \end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath37 is the _ symmetrized correlation function _ ( @xmath38 ) . the response function @xmath39 is defined as the variation of the averaged field @xmath40 with respect to the `` strength '' @xmath41 of a perturbation that modifies the potential energy according to @xmath42 : @xmath43 in linear - response theory , it can be expressed in terms of the averaged commutator : @xmath44 \rangle \\ & = & \left . \frac{\hbar}{i } \left [ \frac{\delta^2}{\delta \xi_i^+(t ) \delta \xi_j^+(t ' ) } + \frac{\delta^2}{\delta \xi_j^+(t ) \delta \xi_i^-(t ' ) } \right ] { \ln } { \cal z } \right|_{{\bbox \xi}=0 } \ ; .\end{aligned}\ ] ] one of the main advantages of this formalism is that the generating functional ( [ generating ] ) admits a path - integral representation which is a slight modification of the usual `` in - out '' feynman path integral . this will allow us to make formal manipulations similar to the ones performed in the study of the dynamics of classical systems via the martin - siggia - rose@xcite ( msr ) formalism . in a short - hand notation , the generating functional reads @xmath28 & = & \int { \cal d}{\bbox \phi}^+ { \cal d}{\bbox \phi}^- \exp\left [ \frac{i}{\hbar } \ , \left ( s[{\bbox \phi^+ } ] -s [ { \bbox \phi^- } ] + \int dt \ , { \bbox \xi}^+(t ) { \bbox \phi}^+(t ) - \int dt \ , { \bbox \xi}^-(t ) { \bbox \phi}^-(t ) \right ) \right ] \nonumber\\ & & \;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\ ; \times \langle { \bbox \phi}^+ | \hat \rho(0 ) | { \bbox \phi}^- \rangle \label{aaab}\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath45 $ ] is the action of the system and @xmath46 stands for the matrix element of the density matrix which has support only at @xmath47 ( see appendix [ appkeldysh ] for a proof of this equation ) . hereafter , we omit the limits of the time - integrals that , unless otherwise stated , go from @xmath48 to @xmath49 . in the following it will be useful to write the correlation and response in terms of the fields @xmath50 , @xmath51 : @xmath52 notice that as a result of having two external sources ( one related to the evolution with time ordering and the other with anti - time ordering ) a doubling of degree of freedom is necessary when writing the path - integral . as we explicitly show in appendix [ classicallimit ] , the doubling of degrees of freedom characteristic of this description is intimately linked to the introduction of lagrange multipliers in the msr description of the classical model . the time - integration in eq . ( [ aaab ] ) can be interpreted as being closed , going forward from @xmath53 to @xmath54 and then backwards from @xmath54 to @xmath53 . this motivates the name of the method . up to now , the discussion has been completely general and it applies to systems with an arbitrary number of degrees of freedom . we now consider the coupling of the system of interest to a thermal quantum bath , assumed to be in equilibrium . a convenient way to deal with the interaction between the system and the bath in the path - integral formalism is due to feynman and vernon . @xcite in this approach one starts by describing the system plus bath by @xmath55 with @xmath56 denoting the variables of the system and @xmath57 , @xmath58 , denoting the variables of the bath . the total action is @xmath59= s_s[{\bbox \sigma } ] + s_b[{\bbox v}^a ] + s_{sb}[{\bbox{\sigma , v}^a}]\ ] ] where @xmath60 is the action characterizing the system ( and eventually depending upon disorder ) , @xmath61 is the action for the bath , and @xmath62 contains the system - bath interaction terms . for definiteness we assume that our system interacts linearly with the bath which we model as a set of independent harmonic oscillators , @xmath63 = s _ { s}[{\bbox \sigma } ] + \frac12 \sum_{a=1}^{n_b } \ , m_a \ , \left ( \dot { \bbox v}_a^2 - \omega_a^2 \ , { \bbox v}_a^2 \right ) - \sum_{a=1}^{n_b } c_a { \bbox v}_a { \bbox \sigma } \ ; .\ ] ] @xmath64 are their masses , @xmath65 their frequencies and @xmath66 the coupling constants between the oscillators and the system . of course , more general couplings between bath and system are possible but this is the simplest choice that allows us to go a bit farther analytically . if we further assume that the initial density matrix @xmath67 is factorizable as @xmath68 where @xmath69 is the boltzman distribution for the bath variables at equilibrium at a temperature @xmath70 , one can integrate out the bath variables , obtaining in this way an effective thermal action @xmath71 $ ] , that enters the _ feynman - vernon influence functional _ : @xmath72 & = & - \int dt \int dt ' \ ; \left ( { \bbox \sigma}^+(t ) - { \bbox \sigma}^-(t ) \right ) \ , \eta(t - t ' ) \ , \left ( { \bbox \sigma}^+(t ' ) + { \bbox \sigma}^-(t ' ) \right ) \nonumber\\ & & + i\int dt \int dt ' \ ; \left ( { \bbox \sigma}^+(t ) - { \bbox \sigma}^-(t ) \right ) \ , \nu(t - t ' ) \ , \left ( { \bbox \sigma}^+(t ' ) - { \bbox \sigma}^-(t ' ) \right ) \ ; . \label{sthermal}\end{aligned}\ ] ] the noise and dissipative kernels @xmath73 and @xmath74 are given by @xcite @xmath75 in these equations , @xmath76 is the spectral density of the bath : @xmath77 the system - bath interaction manifests via the appearance of two quadratic and non - local terms ( [ sthermal ] ) in the effective action . as it can be most easily seen in the classical limit presented in appendix [ classicallimit ] they can be related to the noise and dissipative terms of the associated langevin formulation of the classical dynamics . in addition , it is easy to see that the kernels @xmath73 and @xmath74 are related to the correlation and response functions of the bath . in fact @xmath78 is the response of the bath while @xmath79 is the correlation of the bath . they are related in a way dictated by the fluctuation - dissipation theorem ( fdt ) : @xmath80 ( see appendix [ appfdt ] for the derivation and properties of the quantum fdt . ) this equation is the quantum counterpart of the fluctuation - dissipation relation of classical relaxational dynamics , that fixes the dissipative coefficient in terms of the strength of the noise correlation of the langevin equation . it expresses the fact that the bath is assumed to be in equilibrium at the initial time @xmath48 and that it stays in equilibrium at all subsequent times @xmath81 . it is important to notice that the assumption of thermal equilibrium of the bath _ does not imply _ that the system that is in contact with it is in equilibrium at the initial time nor that it will reach equilibrium at a given equilibration time @xmath82 . it is known that `` mean - field '' classical disordered models with relaxational dynamics the @xmath0 spin - glass model is an example do not reach equilibrium at any time if the limit of @xmath15 going to infinity is taken at the outset of the calculation.@xcite it is one of the main aims of this paper to show that this result carries through to the quantum case . as a consequence of the out of equilibrium behavior , we shall find that the fdt _ does not hold _ between response and correlation of the system in a sub - critical region of the phase diagram . the integrals in the @xmath74 and @xmath73 definitions are , in general , ill - defined ( divergent ) and might need to be regularized . a way to regularize them@xcite is to observe that one expects @xmath76 to decrease to zero for large @xmath83 and introduce an explicit cut - off : @xmath84 by modifying @xmath76 in this way , we regularize the kernels @xmath74 and @xmath73 at the same time preserving the fdt relation for the bath variables ; in other words , we do not break the assumption of equilibrium of the bath . different environments are characterized by different behaviors of @xmath76 such that for @xmath85 : @xmath86 a typical example is @xcite @xmath87 where @xmath88 is a constant that plays the rle of a friction coefficient . throughout this paper , we concentrate in the ohmic case . the kernel @xmath74 is @xmath89 in the limit where the cut - off tends to infinity it becomes @xmath90 of particular importance is the zero temperature limit of the kernel @xmath73 : @xmath91 one sees that the quantum fluctuations yield a non - trivial kernel even in the absence of thermal fluctuations . in the zero temperature limit the characteristic time goes to infinity and the long - time decay of @xmath73 becomes power - law : @xmath92 in the classical limit , for any temperature , @xmath73 becomes @xmath93 note that for a finite cut - off @xmath94 , the classical limit of the kernel @xmath73 also has a rather slow , power - law decay at large time differences . if , next , the cut - off is sent to infinity one recovers a delta function @xmath95 characteristic of e.g. a white thermal noise . the classical limit of these terms is further discussed in appendix [ classicallimit ] where we show that the dynamic equations of the corresponding classical model correspond to a friction coefficient @xmath96 . the coupling to the quantum thermal bath introduces three time - scales into the problem . first , the inverse cut - off @xmath97 characterizes the memory of the bath . second , the coupling strength @xmath98 yields the inverse relaxational characteristic time . third , @xmath99 accounts for the relative importance of quantum to thermal effects . the ctp formalism results to be well suited for problems with disorder.@xcite let us suppose that the system under consideration is described by the action , @xmath100 = s_{\sc o}[\bbox{\sigma } ] - \int dt \ , v[\bbox{\sigma } , j]\ ] ] where @xmath101 is the disordered independent part of the action and @xmath102 $ ] is the potential energy that depends upon random couplings collectively denoted by @xmath103 . as usual in disordered systems , we concentrate on quantities that are averaged over the disorder distribution @xmath104 $ ] . we wish to consider the real - time dynamics of the system starting from a _ random initial condition _ at time @xmath48 when it is set in contact with the environment ( that is itself in equilibrium at a constant temperature @xmath31 ) . given that the initial condition is chosen to be random , it is not correlated with the disorder . therefore , the density operator @xmath67 does not depend upon disorder and the generating functional without sources @xmath105 = \mbox{tr } \ , [ \ , \hat\rho(0 ) \ , ] \ ] ] _ is also independent of disorder_. this property is equivalent to the independence of the classical martin - siggia - rose ( msr ) generating functional @xcite without sources upon disorder.@xcite as in the classical case , it allows us to write dynamic equations for random initial conditions without having to compute the average over disorder of @xmath106 $ ] and hence without resorting to the use of replicas . we are then interested in the averaged generating functional : @xmath107 } = \int d j p[j ] \ ; { \cal z } [ \bbox{\xi}^+ , \bbox{\xi}^- , j ] \ ; , \ ] ] from which any averaged operator can be computed as @xmath108 } { \delta { \bbox \xi}^+(t ) } } \right| _ { { \bbox \xi } = 0 } = \left . \frac{1}{{\cal z}[0,0,j ] } \ ; \frac{\delta \overline{{\cal z}[{\bbox \xi}^+,{\bbox \xi}^-,j ] } } { \delta { \bbox \xi}^+(t ) } \right| _ { { \bbox \xi } = 0 } \ ; , \end{aligned}\ ] ] with all sources set to zero and @xmath109 . here and in what follows , the overline represents an average over the disorder . in many cases of interest , the integration over the disorder can be performed explicitly , @xmath110 \ ; \exp \left[-\frac{i}{h } \int dt \left ( \ , v[{\bbox \sigma}^+ , j ] - v[\bbox{\sigma } ^- , j ] \ , \right ) \right]= \exp \left[- \frac{i}{h } v_{\sc d } [ \bbox { \sigma}^+ , \bbox{\sigma}^- ] \right ] \;\ ] ] and it introduces a non - linear interaction term that is , in general , non - local both in time and in the `` space '' indices @xmath111 . a rather general way of introducing randomness is to consider a model with a gaussian random potential energy term @xmath112 $ ] depending upon the variables @xmath56 and correlated as @xmath113 v[{\bbox \sigma } ' , j ] } = - \frac{n}{2 } { \cal v } \left ( \frac { ( { \bbox \sigma } - { \bbox \sigma}')^2}{n } \right ) \label{randompotential } \ ; .\ ] ] the variables @xmath19 may represent spins leading to a spin - glass model or a position in an @xmath15-dimensional space becoming the problem of the dynamics and/or diffusion of a particle in a random potential . since we are interested in following the real time dynamics of such systems , @xmath19 will be a time - dependent @xmath15-vector . for the sake of definiteness , we shall solve a particular realization of the random potential that in the classical case defines the so - called @xmath0 spin - glass : @xcite @xmath114 = - \sum_{i_1 < \dots < i_p}^n j_{i_i\dots i_p } \ , \sigma_{i_1 } \dots \sigma_{i_p } \;.\ ] ] @xmath0 is a parameter , @xmath115 . the interaction strengths are quenched independent random variables with a gaussian distribution @xmath116 = \sqrt { \frac{n^{p-1}}{{\tilde j}^2\pi p ! } } \ ; \exp \left ( - \frac{n^{p-1}}{{\tilde j}^2 p ! } \sum_{i_1 \neq \dots \neq i_p } ( j_{i_i\dots i_p})^2 \right ) \;\;\;\;\;\;\;\ ; \rightarrow \;\;\;\;\;\;\;\ ; \overline { ( j_{i_i\dots i_p})^2 } = \frac{{\tilde j}^2 p!}{2 n^{p-1 } } \ ; .\ ] ] this corresponds to a random potential correlation @xmath117 and it leads to an effective , non - local in time , interaction @xmath118 & = & \frac{{\tilde j}^2 ni}{4 \hbar } \int dt \int dt ' \left [ \ ; \left ( \frac1n { \bbox \sigma}^+(t ) { \bbox \sigma}^+(t ' ) \right)^p + \left ( \frac1n { \bbox \sigma}^-(t ) { \bbox \sigma}^-(t ' ) \right)^p \right . \nonumber\\ & & \left . \;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\ ; - \left ( \frac1n { \bbox \sigma}^+(t ) { \bbox \sigma}^-(t ' ) \right)^p - \left ( \frac1n { \bbox \sigma}^-(t ) { \bbox \sigma}^+(t ' ) \right)^p \;\ ; \right ] \ ; . \label{actionv}\end{aligned}\ ] ] in its spherical version,@xcite @xmath119 are continuous dynamic variables @xmath120 , @xmath121 , that satisfy the global spherical constraint @xmath122 at each instant . we enforce this constraint by introducing a time - dependent lagrange multiplier @xmath123 . the disordered - independent part of the action is @xmath124 = \int dt \ , \left [ \frac{m}{2 } { \dot { \bbox \sigma}}^2 - \frac{z}{2 } \left ( { \bbox \sigma}^2 -n \right ) \right ] \label{actiono } \ ; .\ ] ] as explained in the introduction , for simplicity we have chosen a kinetic term that dictates a microscopic dynamics with second derivatives in time . other choices , for example leading to first time - derivatives , are also possible . the derivation of the dynamic equations that we explain in section [ meanfieldequations ] applies with only minor modifications . we now have all the elements to derive the equations which describe the dynamic evolution of a disordered quantum system . according to the discussion in section [ ctp ] , the system is described by the generating functional @xmath125 } = \int { \cal d}{\bbox \sigma}^+ { \cal d}{\bbox \sigma}^- \exp\left [ \frac{i}{\hbar } \ , \left ( s_{\sc eff}[{\bbox \sigma^+ } , { \bbox \sigma^- } ] + \int dt \ , { \bbox \xi}^+(t ) { \bbox \sigma^+}(t ) - \int dt \ , { \bbox \xi}^-(t ) { \bbox \sigma^-(t ) } \right ) \right]\ ] ] with @xmath126 = s_{\sc o}[{\bbox \sigma}^+ ] - s_{\sc o}[{\bbox \sigma}^- ] + s_{\sc t}[{\bbox \sigma}^+ , { \bbox \sigma}^- ] - v_{\sc d}[{\bbox \sigma}^+ , { \bbox \sigma}^- ] \ ; . \label{action1}\ ] ] we remind that @xmath101 is the disorder independent part of the action given by eq . ( [ actiono ] ) , @xmath127 accounts for the the system - bath interaction , eq . ( [ sthermal ] ) , and @xmath128 is the effective potential which arises as a result of the integration over the disorder and is given by eq . ( [ actionv ] ) . the quantum dynamic equations of motion follow from similar steps to those usually used @xcite to obtain the classical equations of motion in the martin - siggia - rose formalism . we introduce macroscopic order parameters and derive , through a saddle - point point approximation of the ks generating functional ( that becomes exact when @xmath129 ) , the dynamic equations of motion . since we are interested in considering the dynamics of the system for _ large but finite _ times with respect to @xmath15 , out of equilibrium effects are expected . we shall therefore make no assumption about the time - dependence of the order - parameters . the quadratic terms in the action can be condensed into one term by introducing the operator @xmath130 in such a way that @xmath126 = -\frac12 \int dt \int dt ' { \bbox \sigma}^\alpha(t ) \ , \mbox{op}^{\alpha\beta}(t , t ' ) { \bbox \sigma}^\beta(t ' ) - v_{\sc d}[{\bbox \sigma}^+ , { \bbox \sigma}^-]\ ] ] where greek indices label @xmath131 and the sum convention is assumed . introducing the identity @xmath132 into the generating functional , the full action can be rewritten as @xmath133 & = & - \frac{1}{2}\int dt \int dt ' \ ; { \bbox \sigma^\alpha}(t ) \ , \left ( \ , \mbox{op}^{\alpha\beta}(t , t ' ) + \lambda^{\alpha\beta}(t , t ' ) \right ) { \bbox \sigma}^\beta(t ' ) \nonumber\\ & & + \frac{n}{2 } \int dt \int dt ' \lambda^{\alpha\beta}(t , t ' ) \ , q^{\alpha\beta}(t , t ' ) + \frac{n}{2 } \int dt \left ( z^+(t ) - z^-(t ) \right ) \nonumber\\ & & + \frac{i { \tilde j}^2 n}{4 \hbar } \int dt \int dt ' \left [ \ , \left(q^{++}(t , t ' ) \right)^p + \left ( q^{--}(t , t ' ) \right)^p \right . \nonumber\\ & & \;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\ ; - \left . \left ( q^{+-}(t , t ' ) \right)^p - \left ( q^{-+}(t , t ' ) \right)^p \ , \right ] \ ; .\end{aligned}\ ] ] the stationary - point values of the order parameters @xmath134 with @xmath135 are related to the `` physical '' correlations and responses defined in eqs . ( [ defcorr ] ) and ( [ defresp ] ) as follows @xmath136 with @xmath137 it is easy to check that these functions satisfy the identity for all pairs of times @xmath138 . in the classical case this is a requirement to be imposed upon the saddle - point two - point functions in order to preserve causality . in the quantum case , this condition emerges as a property of the green functions . ] @xmath139 the functional integration over @xmath140 and @xmath141 is now quadratic and can be performed . this amounts to replace the quadratic term in @xmath142 by @xmath143 at this stage , all terms in the action depend upon the `` macroscopic '' quantities @xmath144 and @xmath145 and are proportional to @xmath15 . since it is easier to write the equations in matrix notation , we encode @xmath146 and @xmath147 in two matrices @xmath148 and we define @xmath149(t , t ' ) & \equiv & \left ( \begin{array}{rl } ( q^{++}(t , t'))^{p-1 } \ ; & \ ; -(q^{+-}(t , t'))^{p-1 } \\ -(q^{-+}(t , t'))^{p-1 } \ ; & \ ; ( q^{--}(t , t'))^{p-1 } \end{array } \right ) \label{saddlef } \ ; .\end{aligned}\ ] ] we denote with a cross the standard operational product @xmath150 where a sum over @xmath151 is assumed . the saddle - point with respect to @xmath152 yields @xmath153 the matrix and time - operator inverse of @xmath154 is denoted @xmath155 . the saddle - point equation with respect to @xmath134 yields @xmath156(t , t ' ) \ ; . \label{saddleq}\ ] ] equations ( [ saddlelambda ] ) and ( [ saddleq ] ) imply , in a compact matrix and time - operator notation , @xmath157 \otimes { \cal q } \ ; , \label{saddleq}\ ] ] where @xmath158 is the identity : @xmath159 . the saddle - point with respect to @xmath145 yields @xmath160 and these equations lead , as expected , to the spherical constraint . in the limit @xmath129 one could also proceed as in refs . [ ] and write the full action @xmath161 in terms of a _ single _ variable . this is at the expense of modifying the thermal kernel and the interaction term in a self - consistent way , through the introduction of terms arising from the non - linear interactions ( the vertex @xmath162 and the self - energy @xmath163 , respectively ) . this procedure is not of particular usefulness for the analysis of the model we treat in this paper since the single variable effective action is gaussian . it does however become useful for dealing with quantum models whose single - spin effective action has higher order interaction terms . an example is the quantum sherrington - kirkpatrick model . one could then envisage to derive an effective quantum langevin equation for the single variable@xcite and study this equation with an adequate numerical algorithm as the one developed by eissfeller and opper.@xcite the dynamic equations for the auto - correlation and response follow from the set of equations ( [ saddlef])-([saddleq ] ) and the definitions of the dynamic order parameters given in eqs . ( [ q++])-([q ] ) . more precisely , the equation of motion for the response function follows from the subtraction of the @xmath164 and @xmath165 components of eq . ( [ saddleq ] ) : @xmath166 \ , r(t'',t ' ) \ ; , \label{eqr1}\end{aligned}\ ] ] and the equation of motion for the auto - correlation function follows from the addition of the @xmath165 and @xmath167 components of eq . ( [ saddleq ] ) : @xmath168 \label{eqc1 } \ ; .\end{aligned}\ ] ] written in this way , eq . ( [ eqc1 ] ) is complex . its imaginary part yields @xmath169 moreover , since the response is causal , products of advanced @xmath170 and retarded @xmath171 responses vanish identically for all @xmath172 : @xmath173 and one can show that for any integer @xmath174 and any constants @xmath175 , @xmath176 @xmath177 ^k= \left [ c(t , t ' ) + c_1 r(t , t ' ) \right ] ^k + \left [ c(t , t ' ) + c_2 r(t',t ) \right ] ^k - c^k(t , t ' ) \ ; .\ ] ] using this property one has @xmath178^{p-1}\ ] ] and @xmath179 = \nonumber\\ & & 2 c(t'',t ' ) \mbox{im } \left [ c(t , t'')-\frac{i \hbar}{2 } r(t , t '' ) \right]^{p-1 } -\hbar r(t',t '' ) \mbox{re}\left [ c(t , t'')-\frac{i\hbar}{2 } ( r(t , t'')+ r(t'',t ) ) \right]^{p-1 } \ ; . \nonumber\\\end{aligned}\ ] ] we can identify the self - energy @xmath163 and the vertex @xmath162 as @xmath180^{p-1 } \ ; , \label{sigmatilde } \\ d(t , t')- 2 \hbar \nu(t - t ' ) & \equiv & \tilde{d}(t , t ' ) \equiv \frac{p \tilde{j}^2}{2 } \mbox{re}\left [ c(t , t')-\frac{i\hbar}{2 } ( r(t , t')+ r(t',t ) ) \right]^{p-1 } \ ; . \label{dtilde}\end{aligned}\ ] ] for @xmath181 , they can be encoded in a single complex equation : @xmath182 note that the total self - energy @xmath183 and vertex @xmath184 are real and have two contributions of different origin : one arises from the interaction of the system and the bath ( @xmath74 and @xmath73 ) and one is caused by the non - linearities stemming from the average over disorder ( that we called @xmath163 and @xmath162 in eqs . ( [ sigmatilde ] ) and ( [ dtilde ] ) ) . if @xmath13 , @xmath163 and @xmath162 are identical to the classical ones . instead , if @xmath185 , the non - linear terms acquire an explicit dependence upon @xmath186 . the dynamic equations can then be written in a compact form @xmath187 that we call later the @xmath188-eq . and @xmath189-eq . , respectively . it is important to realize that the self - energy @xmath190 is proportional to the response function @xmath191 , which in turns implies @xmath192 this means that the upper limit of integration in eqs . ( [ schwingerr ] ) and ( [ schwingerc ] ) is @xmath193 , which renders the equations explicitly causal . there are no more independent equations for @xmath188 and @xmath189 . the other two equations that can be obtained from eq . ( [ saddleq ] ) are the equation for @xmath194 , that is equivalent to the @xmath188-eq above , and one equation that identically cancels by virtue of the identity ( [ identityqo ] ) . in their integrated form as schwinger - dyson equations the dynamic equations read : @xmath195 with the propagator given by @xmath196 real and imaginary parts of eqs . ( [ z+ ] ) and ( [ z- ] ) combined with eq . ( [ saddlelambda ] ) imply the equal - times conditions @xmath197 in addition , from eq . ( [ eqr1 ] ) one obtains that the first derivative of the response function is discontinuous at equal times : @xmath198 while from eq . ( [ eqc1 ] ) one obtains that the correlation is continuous : @xmath199 the equation for @xmath200 can be derived from the schwinger - dyson equation ( [ intschwingerc ] ) , by imposing the spherical constraint through the evaluation at @xmath201 . multiplying operationally by @xmath202 one obtains @xmath203 \nonumber\\ & & + m \int_0^t dt '' \int_0^t dt ' '' \ , ( \partial_t r(t , t '' ) ) \,d(t'',t''')\ , ( \partial_t r(t , t ' '' ) ) \ ; .\end{aligned}\ ] ] the last term is a consequence of having a kinetic term with second derivatives . had we chosen a first derivative term in the kinetic energy the last term would have not appeared . it can be easily identified with minus the second - derivative of the correlation at equal times by taking the limit @xmath204 in eq . ( [ schwingerc ] ) . thus @xmath205 - m \left . \frac{\partial^2 } { \partial t^2 } c(t , t ' ) \right|_{t'\to t^- } \ ; . \label{zeq}\ ] ] in conclusion , eqs . ( [ schwingerr ] ) , ( [ schwingerc ] ) and ( [ zeq ] ) are the complete set of equations that determines the dynamics of the system . in the following we make a time reparametrization @xmath206 that implies @xmath207 and @xmath208 the system of units we use is @xmath209 & = & [ \hat r ] = [ \hat \hbar ] = 1 \ ; , \nonumber\\ \left[\hat m \right ] & = & [ \hat \beta ] = [ 1/\hat{\tilde j } ] = [ 1/\hat{\lambda } ] = [ \hat{t } ] \ ; .\end{aligned}\ ] ] hereafter we write the equation in reparametrized variables and drop all hats . as already mentioned , the set of integro - differential equations ( [ schwingerr ] ) , ( [ schwingerc ] ) and ( [ zeq ] ) is causal as in the classical case and one can attempt a numerical solution by a simple algorithm . the correlation @xmath210 and response @xmath191 are _ two time quantities _ , that is , they depend on @xmath193 ( which physically corresponds to the time of observation ) and @xmath211 ( which corresponds to the age of the system ) . in a normal situation , one expects that after an equilibration time @xmath82 ( in general model dependent ) all two - time functions will depend only on the time difference @xmath212 . in other words , all two - time functions become time - translation invariant ( tti ) . under these circumstances , to which we refer as equilibrium evolution , response and correlation are not independent quantities but are linked via the fluctuation - dissipation theorem ( fdt ) . nevertheless , it is also known that certain systems never reach ( at least for experimentally accessible time - scales ) an equilibrium dynamics . for arbitrary large @xmath211 and in a certain region of the parameter space , although one - time quantities , such as the energy - density , tend to an asymptotic limit , two - time quantities , such as the correlation and response , depend both on @xmath193 and @xmath211 in a non - trivial way . this is indeed the typical situation for a glassy system.@xcite the question we would like to explore is whether eqs . ( [ schwingerr ] ) , ( [ schwingerc ] ) and ( [ zeq ] ) encode a non - equilibrium evolution as described above . we know that indeed this is the case for classical disordered systems . as shown in ref . [ ] , this kind of equations describe , at least partially , the non equilibrium dynamics of glassy systems , notably _ aging _ effects of spin - glasses . the salient feature of these solutions is that , below a critical temperature @xmath213 , and for large @xmath211 , there exist at least two time scales : for @xmath212 small with respect to a characteristic time @xmath214 , that depends upon the age of the system , the dynamics is similar to an equilibrium evolution ( stationary regime ) but for @xmath212 large with respect to @xmath214 the dynamics becomes extremely slow with aging effects . in this regime , correlation and response are related in a manner that violates fdt . in this paper we show that this also happens in the quantum problem in a region of parameter space . in what follows we concentrate on the case @xmath17 . as in the classical case , the @xmath13 model is connected to @xmath14 models and has a different behavior . in fig . [ phasediagram ] we present a schematic phase diagram @xmath215 for @xmath216 . as we show below , the dynamics in the disordered ( paramagnetic ) and ordered ( spin - glass ) phases are characterized by equilibrium and `` out - of - equilibrium '' effects , respectively . the dynamics for the quantum system in the glassy phase has a similar pattern to the classical one , in the sense that there are at least two time - sectors in which the evolution is of a different nature . inspired by the classical problem,@xcite we propose that also in the quantum case the weak - ergodicity breaking @xcite and the weak long - term memory @xcite properties hold . these two assumptions are based in part on the insight coming from the numerical solution of the full equations . the _ weak - ergodicity breaking scenario _ states that , for @xmath181 , the correlation function decays in such a way that @xmath217 in these equations @xmath218 is the edwards - anderson order parameter that characterizes the spin - glass phase . this means that for large @xmath181 such that @xmath212 is small with respect to @xmath214 , the correlation function first decays from 1 to @xmath218 in a time - translational invariant manner . @xmath214 is a growing function of @xmath211 whose precise form depends on the model . the correlation goes further below @xmath218 to eventually reach @xmath219 in a manner that depends both upon @xmath193 and @xmath211 ( the aging effect ) . this behavior suggests the presence of at least two time - sectors in which the dynamics is stationary and non - stationary , respectively . we then write the correlation as the sum of a stationary and an aging contribution : @xmath220 the matching conditions at equal times between @xmath221 and @xmath222 are @xmath223 with @xmath224 together with eq . ( [ limitqq ] ) they ensure that in the two - time sector in which @xmath221 decays from @xmath225 to @xmath219 , @xmath222 is just a constant @xmath218 . instead , in the time - sector in which @xmath222 decays from @xmath218 to @xmath219 , @xmath221 vanishes identically . the name weak - ergodicity breaking @xcite reflects the fact that for short time - differences the system behaves as if it would be trapped in some region of phase space of `` size '' @xmath218 suggesting ergodicity breaking . however , it is always able to escape this region in a time - scale @xmath214 that depends upon its age @xmath211 . hence , trapping is gradual and ergodicity breaking is _ weak_. we recall that in the classical and purely relaxational case ( langevin dynamics ) the correlation functions are monotonic with respect to both times @xmath193 and @xmath211 . however , in the presence of inertial terms there can be oscillations and the decay can be non - monotonic . this will depend upon the relative value of the mass @xmath226 with respect to the other parameters in the problem . for the parameters we study in this paper , the oscillations appear only in the stationary regime , the aging dynamics having a monotonic decay towards zero . this is relevant since it will allow us to use the general properties of monotonic correlation functions proven in ref . [ ] to find the two - time scaling of @xmath227 . regarding the response function , we propose @xmath228 with @xmath229 when a system is in equilibrium , the response is simply related to the correlation via fdt . here we need to extend this relation to a non - equilibrium quantum situation . as in the classical case we assume that the dynamics in the stationary regime is like an equilibrium dynamics and satisfies fdt . we then assume that @xmath230 and @xmath231 are related by @xmath232 ( see appendix [ appfdt ] ) . in contrast , in the time - sector in which the dynamics is non - stationary and manifestly non - equilibrium , fdt will be modified . in section [ generalfdt ] we suggest an extension of fdt to quantum non - equilibrium systems with slow dynamics , that we later check in the particular model under study . the _ weak long - term memory scenario _ states@xcite that the system keeps a weak memory of what happened in the past . more precisely , the response function tends to zero when times get far apart , @xmath233 and its integral over a _ finite _ time - interval also vanishes @xmath234 but , its integral over an interval that grows with time gives a finite contribution : @xmath235 note that the property ( [ shortr ] ) implies @xmath236 an important quantity that reflects the decay of the response function is the two - time susceptibility defined as the integral of the response over the time - interval @xmath237 $ ] : @xmath238 ( @xmath239 is the strength of the applied perturbation , see eq . ( [ respdef ] ) ) . in the classical case , a useful description of the departure from fdt is obtained by plotting @xmath240 vs @xmath241 for several @xmath242 using @xmath243 as a parameter . since the classical fdt implies @xmath244 , violations of the theorem manifest as departures from a straight line plot . in the quantum case , the relation between @xmath188 and @xmath189 is more involved and _ a priori _ one does not expect these plots to be useful . as we show in section [ generalfdt ] , it turns out that even for a quantum system these parametric plots are relevant . in the paramagnetic phase ( see fig . [ phasediagram ] ) one expects that , after a short non - equilibrium transient , a time - translational invariant ( tti ) solution establishes . we show that a tti ansatz implies that fdt holds between @xmath188 and c and between @xmath163 and @xmath162 . by solving numerically the full set of equations ( [ schwingerr ] ) , ( [ schwingerc ] ) and ( [ zeq ] ) we show the correctness of this ansatz and later discuss some properties of the solutions . after the short initial transient , one - time quantities such as @xmath123 should reach a limit @xmath245 . we evaluate it as @xmath246 - m \left . \partial^2_{t } c(t - t ' ) \right|_{t'\to t^{-}\to\infty } \ ; .\ ] ] the fourier - transform of eqs . ( [ schwingerr ] ) and ( [ schwingerc ] ) yields _ the quantum mode - coupling equations _ : @xmath247 thus , @xmath248 if we now assume that @xmath163 and @xmath162 are related by fdt , it is easy to check that eqs . ( [ 111 ] ) , ( [ 222 ] ) and ( [ imromega ] ) imply that @xmath188 and @xmath189 are also related by fdt . the proof is completed by showing that fdt between @xmath188 and @xmath189 implies fdt between @xmath163 and @xmath162 . this is easier to do in the time - domain , by verifying that eq . ( [ fdttemporal ] ) holds between @xmath163 and @xmath162 if it does between @xmath188 and @xmath189 . a solution of this type exists only in a restricted region of the phase diagram . in order to demonstrate the existence of a dynamic transition , we solve the _ full _ dynamic equations numerically and find that at a critical line , both the tti and fdt assumptions break down . for the purpose of solving eqs . ( [ schwingerr ] ) , ( [ schwingerc ] ) and ( [ zeq ] ) numerically , we proceed as in the purely relaxational classical case.@xcite notice though that the presence of non local kernels @xmath74 and @xmath73 , that resemble the delta - function and appear convoluted with the correlation and response , renders the numerical solution harder . the larger the cut - off @xmath94 , the smaller the iteration step @xmath249 we need to compute these integrals with a good precision . we found an acceptable data collapse for @xmath250 if @xmath251 . note that the values of @xmath249 typically used in the purely relaxational case are at least one order of magnitude larger . this is the reason why the time - window we explore here is rather narrow though it suffices to show the trend of the solution . even after rescaling time and all parameters in the problem , there are still many free parameters left : @xmath252 we here concentrate on the dependence upon only a small fraction of this set . we fix hereafter @xmath216 , @xmath253 , @xmath254 and @xmath251 and study the behavior upon the remaining parameters @xmath255 . we discuss the data for the correlation , response and integrated response for three points in the paramagnetic phase : * @xmath256 . this corresponds to the classical problem with colored noise and inertia . the classical critical temperature for the purely relaxational case is @xmath257 . in fig . [ fight2 ] we show the correlation @xmath258 vs. the time - difference @xmath259 for @xmath260 . in fig . [ fight3 ] we plot the response @xmath261 vs @xmath259 for the same waiting times . in both cases the decay is very fast , typical of upper critical dynamics , and tti quickly sets in ( cfr . the curves for @xmath262 and @xmath263 that are indistinguishable in both plots ) . in the inset , we plot the integrated response @xmath264 vs. @xmath258 for @xmath265 using @xmath259 as a parameter . the @xmath266 vs. @xmath189 plot very soon becomes a straight line of slope @xmath267 showing that the classical fdt is satisfied . * @xmath268 . this corresponds to a strong quantum regime without thermal noise . the data for correlations and response in figs . [ fighhbar3 - 1 ] and [ fighhbar3 ] are qualitatively similar to the ones for the classical problem at high temperatures in the sense that an equilibrium regime is quickly attained . the decay is fast and tti holds . in the inset of fig . [ fighhbar3 ] we display the @xmath266 vs. @xmath189 plot . in this strong quantum case at @xmath7 , the curve severely deviates from the classical expectation of a straight line of infinite slope . the quantum fluctuation - dissipation theorem is verified in fig . [ rfoul5hbar6t0 ] by comparing the response function obtained numerically with the convolution of the kernel @xmath269 with the numerical correlation function , see eq . ( [ fdtfourier ] ) . these two curves should be equal in equilibrium , as imposed by fdt , and we here check that this is indeed the case in the paramagnetic phase . * this is the quantum problem with both thermal and quantum fluctuations in the paramagnetic phase . in fig . [ mixedhb1t2 ] we check fdt for these parameters and observe , in the @xmath266 vs. @xmath189 curve displayed in the inset , that the fdt becomes the classical . we continue the study of the paramagnetic phase by analyzing the variation with @xmath31 and @xmath186 , close to the transition line , of the out of phase susceptibility @xmath271 this is the quantity that is most commonly measured experimentally . for instance , in the context of the study of quantum phase transitions , the dynamics of the randomly diluted , dipolar coupled , ising magnet liho@xmath2y@xmath3f@xmath4 was studied by measuring,@xcite among other quantities , @xmath272 . we follow two routes to the transition : * @xmath273 , @xmath274 . one approaches the classical model by decreasing the strength of quantum fluctuation at fixed temperature @xmath275 . in fig . [ chit13hbar ] we plot @xmath272 vs. @xmath83 . in the curves for small @xmath186 we observe a local minimum that is associated to the appearance of a plateau in the correlation function , at the value @xmath218 , when approaching @xmath18 . this is typical of `` discontinuous transitions '' as the one in the classical @xmath0-spin model@xcite ( and in super - cooled - liquids@xcite ) . we here note that this feature survives the presence of small quantum fluctuations and progressively disappears when @xmath186 increases . for @xmath276 , the minimum has been substituted by a single peak . * @xmath277 , @xmath278 . one approaches the critical line @xmath279 from above by modifying the strength of the quantum fluctuations while keeping the temperature fixed @xmath280 . figure [ chit01hbar ] displays @xmath272 vs. @xmath83 for this series of @xmath186 . ( we can not get closer to the transition line because the dynamics gets so slow that the stationary limit can not be reached . ) the curves have a distinct peak that moves towards decreasing frequencies for decreasing @xmath186 . the spectral width of the bell - shaped curves also increases when approaching the critical line . the low frequency part of the curves is importantly suppressed with increasing @xmath186 . all these features show that quantum fluctuations radically affect the relaxation . + contrary to fig . [ chit13hbar ] , there is no local minimum in any of the curves . this is in accordance with a decreasing and eventually vanishing plateau value @xmath218 when the parameters approach the quantum critical point . we shall further discuss the behavior of the model close to the transition line in section [ criticalline ] . these results demonstrate the existence of a cross - over in the disordered phase , separating a region where the scaling laws are controlled by the quantum critical point @xmath281 from another region with different scaling laws controlled by the classical critical point @xmath282 . before concluding our analysis of the paramagnetic phase , let us compare our results with the situation encountered for the system@xcite liho@xmath2y@xmath3f@xmath4 , which is believed to be an experimental realization of the transverse ising model . naturally , we do not expect to find the same behavior in both models as we know that in the classical limit they are different:@xcite the classical transition being first order for the @xmath0-spin model and second order for the ising case . our analysis indicates that the dynamic transition of the @xmath0-spin model remains first order along the critical line but becomes second order at the quantum critical point . this is the mirror situation to what has been observed in the dipolar glass . in ref . [ ] , it has been suggested that the quantum spin - glass transition may be first order . figure [ chit13hbar ] displays the effect of quantum fluctuations close to the classical critical point and looks rather similar to fig . 2 in ref . [ ] which instead shows the dynamics close to the quantum critical point . figure [ chit01hbar ] looks similar to fig . 4 in ref . [ ] , where the dynamics close to the classical critical point is presented . this comparison indicates that this model belongs to a different class from the system liho@xmath2y@xmath3f@xmath4 and probably from the transverse field ising model.@xcite in this section we focus on the non - equilibrium dynamics observed in the glassy phase . in order to justify the scenario discussed in section [ scenario ] , we first present the results from the numerical solution of the full equations . next , we analyze these equations in the stationary and aging regimes and obtain a self - consistent relation that determines the edwards - anderson parameter . the numerical solution shows a very different behavior below the critical line @xmath283 . in order to illustrate the slow dynamics , the breakdown of tti and the weak - memory of the system we choose the following parameters : * @xmath284 this is the classical , glassy model studied in ref . [ ] but with the addition of inertia . the effect of inertia amounts to the presence of oscillations around @xmath218 but it does not change the qualitative behavior of the model . for example , as we shown analytically below , the value of @xmath218 is not modified by inertia if @xmath226 is small . * @xmath285 , @xmath286 . this corresponds to pure quantum fluctuations . figure [ ct0hb1 ] shows the correlation @xmath258 vs. @xmath259 for the waiting times @xmath287 . the curves have a stationary and an aging regime separated by the edwards - anderson parameter @xmath288 , see eq . ( [ limitqq ] ) . the correlations decay to zero at far apart times , as in eq . ( [ limit0 ] ) . this demonstrates the weak ergodicity breaking scenario . + in fig . [ rt0hb1 ] we plot the response @xmath261 vs. @xmath259 for the same waiting times . one observes a small time - difference regime , @xmath289 , where tti rapidly establishes and a large time - difference regime , @xmath290 , where the response shows a decaying queue with a @xmath242 dependence . the integration of this queue over a time - interval scaling with @xmath242 will tell us about the violations of fdt in the quantum case ( see fig . [ ml5hb01t0 ] below ) . it also shows that the system has a weak long - term memory as described in section [ scenario ] . * @xmath291 , @xmath286 . the qualitative behavior is similar to that obtained for @xmath7 and @xmath292 apart from the fact that thermal fluctuations slightly decrease the value of the edwards - anderson parameter and accelerate significantly the decay in the aging regime , as demonstrated in fig . [ ct05hb1 ] . the lagrange multiplier @xmath123 is a one - time quantity , i.e. it depends only upon the total time @xmath193 . in this formalism we assume that all one - time quantities reach a well - defined limit asymptotically . in appendix [ integrals ] we describe how we obtain the following equation for the asymptotic limit of @xmath123 : @xmath294 - m \left . \partial^2_\tau c_{\sc st}(\tau)\right|_{\tau\to 0 } \ ; .\end{aligned}\ ] ] let us discuss each term in this expression . we called @xmath295 the aging contribution : @xmath296 \ ; . \end{aligned}\ ] ] the kernels @xmath73 and @xmath74 , that are related to the bath , do not contribute to @xmath295 . this is so because we have assumed that for @xmath297 the kernels have already decayed to zero in such a way that they do not contribute to these integrals . more precisely , we are neglecting terms of the form @xmath298 where @xmath299 is either @xmath73 or @xmath74 and @xmath300 is either @xmath222 or @xmath301 . the second and third terms come from the constant ( non - zero ) limit of the first decay of the correlation @xmath302 and equivalently of the vertex @xmath303 in the model under study @xmath304 if we use @xmath305 , a property of the weak long - term memory scenario . if @xmath306 are such that @xmath307 , the discussion in section [ scenario ] implies @xmath308 and @xmath309 . the schwinger - dyson equation for @xmath188 in this time sector reads @xmath310 and it keeps the same form as in the high - temperature regime , apart from the fact that the constant @xmath245 has contributions from the aging regime . the schwinger - dyson equation for @xmath189 reads @xmath311 \ ; . \label{cst}\end{aligned}\ ] ] one can now fourier - transform both equations @xmath312 the formal solution to the equation for @xmath221 is @xmath313 the first term on the right - hand - side has an imaginary and a real part . the imaginary part vanishes identically since , due to fdt , both @xmath314 and @xmath315 are proportional to @xmath316 which is zero at @xmath317 . concerning the real part of this first term , as we have assumed that @xmath231 goes to zero for @xmath318 , we need to impose the self - consistent condition @xmath319 this is the condition that fixes the edwards - anderson parameter . we shall find it again in the next section as the matching condition between the stationary and aging regimes . the final equation for @xmath320 is @xmath321 one can check that these calculations are consistent with the results from @xmath245 . actually , the integrals in @xmath21-eq . involving the stationary parts can be evaluated with the help of the equations for @xmath322 and @xmath221 , eqs . ( [ rstat ] ) and ( [ cstat ] ) , and yield once again eq . ( [ cond2 ] ) . similarly to the high - temperature case one can now show that fdt for @xmath323 and @xmath324 implies fdt for @xmath322 and @xmath221 . the remainder of the proof , i.e. to show that fdt between @xmath322 and @xmath221 implies fdt between @xmath323 and @xmath324 depends only upon the from of @xmath323 and @xmath324 as functions of @xmath322 and @xmath221 and is not modified from the one discussed in section [ equilibriumdynamics ] . if we now choose the times @xmath138 to be well - separated so as to have @xmath325 and @xmath326 , the weak - ergodicity breaking and weak long - term memory hypotheses allow us to throw the second time derivatives on the left - hand - side . we assume that their contribution is much weaker than the one of each of the integral terms on the right - hand - side . this is an assumption that we have to verify at the end of the calculation , once the solution for @xmath222 and @xmath301 is known . it corresponds to the over - damped limit : @xmath327 using the approximation described in appendix [ integrals ] , the @xmath188-eq in the aging regime becomes @xmath328 and we call it the @xmath301-eq . similarly , the @xmath189-eq becomes @xmath329 and we call it the @xmath222-eq . in all integrals we approximated @xmath330 and @xmath331 since @xmath332 and @xmath333 are very rapidly decreasing functions . the edwards - anderson parameter @xmath218 is determined self - consistently from the matching of @xmath334 . taking the limit @xmath204 in the @xmath301-eq and @xmath222-eq one obtains @xmath335 the first equation admits the solution @xmath336 since @xmath337 is proportional to @xmath338 see eq . ( [ sigmatilde ] ) . this corresponds to the high - temperature solution where there is no aging regime . here we concentrate on the other possibility , that is to say when @xmath339 in actual fact , we can further approximate this equation by using one of the assumptions already used all over this section : that the response becomes smaller and smaller as time passes though its integral over an infinite interval gives a finite contribution . if we neglect all terms that are proportional to @xmath338 with respect to terms that are proportional to @xmath218 , only the first term in the power expansions of @xmath163 and @xmath162 survive : @xmath340 that in our model become @xmath341 in accord with the large @xmath259 limit of the stationary values ( [ dqstat ] ) . equations ( [ hola ] ) and ( [ cq ] ) become @xmath342 the second equation is the same as the one arising from the end of the stationary regime , eq . ( [ cond2 ] ) . we now study these equations with the help of eqs . ( [ rstat ] ) and ( [ cstat ] ) for the stationary functions . using @xmath343 one has @xmath344 we remind that the factor @xmath345 can be written in terms of the stationary correlation function using fdt ; therefore this is a closed equation for the correlation that gives the edwards - anderson parameter @xmath218 . in the case of the @xmath0-spin model it reads @xmath346 in the classical case , the integral can be readily computed and the final equation for @xmath218 is @xmath347 that coincides with the result for the purely relaxational dynamics.@xcite for @xmath17 fixed , @xmath218 is a function of temperature ; it equals one at @xmath7 and tends to @xmath348 at the dynamic critical temperature @xmath213 . if @xmath349 , the edwards - anderson parameter @xmath218 depends upon @xmath186 and @xmath31 , @xmath350 . it decreases when thermal and/or quantum fluctuations increase . one observes @xmath351 . at the critical line @xmath352 , @xmath353 as long as @xmath354 . at the _ quantum critical point _ the nature of the transition changes and @xmath355 . we shall explain this result after introducing the modification of the quantum fdt needed to complete the solution . figure [ plotq ] shows the tendency of @xmath356 for @xmath357 . one of the important characteristics of the dynamic evolution in equilibrium is the fluctuation - dissipation theorem theorem ( fdt ) that establishes a model independent relationship ( in the sense that only involves @xmath31 and @xmath186 but no other parameter in the model ) between correlation and response functions . as recalled in appendix [ appfdt ] , this result can be easily obtained , for the quantum and classical cases , under the hypothesis of equilibrium . in general , such a relation is not expected to hold in a non equilibrium situation and we can then say that fdt is violated " ( of course what is violated is not the theorem but the hypothesis under which the result is derived ) . it is nevertheless surprising that in the glassy phase of certain classical models , the violation of fdt @xcite takes such a simple form that it is possible to formulate a generalized version of this relation through the introduction of an effective temperature @xmath358 . @xcite in this way the fdt takes the standard equilibrium form but with a model dependent effective temperature which is different from the bath temperature @xmath31 ( in general @xmath358 is higher or equal than @xmath31 and it can take different values in different time - sectors ) . we would like to explore in this section how these ideas carry over to the quantum case . the standard quantum fluctuation - dissipation theorem states @xmath359 with @xmath360 guided by the classical case , we introduce the effective temperature@xcite @xmath361 and we propose , as a generalization of fdt to the out of equilibrium case , the following relation @xmath362 with @xmath363 and @xmath364 a function of both times @xmath193 and @xmath211 . evidently , eqs . ( [ xfdt1 ] ) and ( [ xfdt2 ] ) reduce to eqs . ( [ fdt1 ] ) and ( [ fdt2 ] ) when @xmath365 if the evolution is tti and the factor @xmath366 is set to one . let us assume , for reasons that are intimately related to the time - separation discussed in section [ scenario ] , that @xmath364 is characterized by @xmath367 for times in the stationary regime @xmath368 this implies : @xmath369 with @xmath370 if we suppose that ( even at @xmath7 ) @xmath371 is finite in the glassy phase , it is then clear that in the aging sector the fourier integral is dominated by @xmath372 . after using @xmath373 we obtain @xmath374 for a standard quantum system in equilibrium at finite temperature , there is a characteristic time , that depends upon temperature and the strength of quantum fluctuations , beyond which the evolution becomes classical . concerning fdt , this means that the classical relation establishes with @xmath375 . this is clear , for instance , for the model under consideration at finite temperature in the paramagnetic phase ( see the inset in fig . [ fight3 ] ) . if our assumptions are correct , the situation in the glassy phase is different . for small times compared with @xmath376 , now a _ waiting - time dependent _ characteristic time , correlation and response are related by the standard ( quantum ) fdt . instead , for time differences larger than @xmath376 , they are related in the same way as in the classical case _ but _ with a @xmath31 and @xmath186 dependent effective temperature that is different from the one of the environment . in general , the proposal given in eq . ( [ fdt6 ] ) will allow us to reduce the @xmath222-eq . and @xmath301-eq equations to single equation for @xmath222 . it is simple to check that , at least for the model under consideration , this equation has the same structure as the one for the classical problem . all dependence on @xmath186 enters through @xmath218 , @xmath377 and @xmath322 . hence , once the explicit form of @xmath377 is known , the aging equations are solved by the same ansatz as in the classical case : @xmath378 note that the general arguments introduced in ref . [ ] to characterize the behavior of _ monotonic _ correlation functions apply to the correlations in the aging regime and justify the solution ( [ agingc])-([agingr ] ) . even if the inertia might make the correlation oscillate , it does only in the stationary regime since it oscillates around @xmath218 , and it becomes monotonic in the aging in eq . ( [ xtwoscales ] ) , we assumed that @xmath364 can take only two values in view of the model we study . however , in the classical case , a more general situation arises in models with multiple time - scales , for which the factor measuring the violation of fdt is a non - constant function of the correlation in the aging regime.@xcite we expect the same structure to carry through to quantum problems whose classical counterparts are of the multi - scale type . we check , both analytically and numerically , the viability of our assumptions for the @xmath0-spin model . the factor @xmath377 measuring the violation of fdt is determined by eqs . ( [ firstq ] ) and ( [ secondqq ] ) @xmath380 using eq . ( [ fdt6 ] ) and the equivalent relation between @xmath381 and @xmath382 , we obtain @xmath383 and @xmath384 in the classical limit @xmath385 and the result in ref . [ ] is recovered . note that both in the classical and quantum case , @xmath386 if @xmath13 . since the case @xmath13 is formally connected to ferromagnetic domain growth ( in the mean - field approximation ) there is still no - memory in the quantum domain growth . the classical critical point @xmath387 is characterized by@xcite @xmath388 following the critical line towards the quantum critical point @xmath389 , one obtains @xmath390 and a finite zero - frequency stationary susceptibility @xmath391 . at the quantum critical point , @xmath218 vanishes and the zero - frequency stationary susceptibility diverges : @xmath392 ( it is interesting to notice that the case @xmath13 is clearly different . ) on the other hand , if approaching the quantum critical point from below along the axis @xmath393 @xmath394 then @xmath395 [ ml5hb01t0 ] we next check numerically the relation between response and correlation in the glassy phase , @xmath396 corresponding to pure quantum fluctuations . first , we use fourier analysis to check the quantum fdt for short time differences . in fig . [ fdthbarfourier ] we compare two different ways of obtaining @xmath397 for total time @xmath193 fixed and equal to @xmath398 . the thin curve is the result from the direct numerical solution of the dynamic equations and shows a fast evolution for short time differences and a tail that gives rise to the weak memory of the system . the bold curve is obtained from eqs . ( [ fdt3 ] ) and ( [ fdt4 ] ) using @xmath399 with @xmath400 obtained numerically . we have estimated the edwards - anderson parameter as @xmath401 . one observes that for small time - differences the two curves coincide showing that fdt holds in this time - sector . second , we check the generalized fdt in the aging regime . for this purpose , it is convenient to use the @xmath266 vs. @xmath189 plots defined in section [ scenario ] . in fig . [ chic1 ] we observe , as predicted by eqs . ( [ fdt3 ] ) , ( [ fdt4 ] ) and ( [ fdt6 ] ) , two behaviors according to the relative value of @xmath189 and @xmath218 . the portion of the graph that is significant for the aging regime corresponds to @xmath402 . as claimed in eq . ( [ fdt6 ] ) the @xmath266 vs @xmath189 curve approaches a time - independent asymptotic limit that is a straight line of slope @xmath403 . in this case , @xmath404 and this shows that even a @xmath7 , @xmath405 . the effective temperature depends on @xmath31 and @xmath186 in a non trivial way . in figure [ chic2 ] we show the @xmath266 vs. @xmath189 plot for @xmath186 = 1 and @xmath7 . in this case @xmath406 . in fig . [ teffmixed ] we work at fixed @xmath407 and study the variation of @xmath358 with t. from the @xmath266 vs @xmath189 plots we determine how @xmath358 varies with @xmath31 by measuring the slopes of the different curves and by using eq . ( [ xfinal ] ) . the six curves above the dotted straight line correspond to temperatures below @xmath1 . from top to bottom @xmath408 . one notices that @xmath409 in all these curves . the curve below the dotted straight line corresponds to @xmath410 . it has a slope @xmath411 ( indicated by the dots ) and @xmath412 . in the inset we plot the temperature dependence of the effective temperature . @xmath358 is linear in @xmath31 when the bath temperature is above @xmath1 but severely deviates from the linear behavior for temperatures below the critical line . two curious features are that , in the glassy phase , @xmath358 increases when either @xmath31 or @xmath186 decrease . the surprising increase of @xmath358 as @xmath31 decreases is also obtained in the classical limit.@xcite in this paper we presented a formalism that allows us to analytically study the behavior of quantum glassy models within the typical situation encountered in experiments , i.e. out of equilibrium . faced to the question as to how relevant quantum fluctuations are for the asymptotic real - time dynamics , one would have naively answered that they are irrelevant since quantum mechanics is not expected to play a relevant role in the large time sector , meaning large @xmath242 and for all @xmath413 . we show in this paper that this would have been a wrong conclusion and that the dynamic behavior is much richer : quantum effects , together with temperature , determine _ where _ in parameter space a glassy phase exists . we show that sufficiently strong quantum fluctuations destroy the glassy phase at arbitrary low temperatures driving the system towards a paramagnetic phase . we predict then the existence of a dynamic quantum phase transition . this has no analogue in the classical model where glassiness is always present at @xmath7 . quantum fluctuations also dictate _ when _ , in the glassy phase , non - equilibrium effects manifest . for any waiting - time @xmath242 after preparation , there exists a characteristic time @xmath376 that determines the end of a stationary regime and the entrance into the aging regime . this means that for time differences @xmath414 the dynamics is stationary while for @xmath415 two - point functions have explicit waiting - time dependences . the characteristic time @xmath376 depends on temperature , the strength of quantum fluctuations and the waiting - time @xmath242 . the dynamics in the paramagnetic phase satisfies the fluctuation - dissipation theorem . in the glassy phase , we found that the quantum fdt is satisfied in the stationary regime and that a generalization is needed in the aging regime . this generalization defines a two - time function @xmath364 that is consistent with the definition of an effective temperature @xmath416 and that we later characterized , based on the numerical evidence for this model . when @xmath358 is different from zero , the modification of the quantum fdt takes a similar form as the classical one but with a @xmath31 and @xmath186 dependent effective temperature . the characteristic time @xmath376 is reminiscent of a decoherence time in the sense that it separates the stationary regime in which the influence of quantum effects is very strong and explicit from the aging regime in which the influence of quantum effects is implicit , appearing through , e.g. , the @xmath186 dependence of @xmath358 . one of the virtues of the approach we have followed is that it is close in spirit to the dynamic approach to classical systems . this encourages us to attempt to extend many of the recent advances in the understanding of classical glassy dynamics to the quantum problem . we mention below some of the questions that merit further attention . the model here studied has a modification of the quantum fdt given by a piecewise function @xmath417 if @xmath418 ( @xmath419 ) and a constant @xmath420 if @xmath421 ( @xmath422 ) . it is known that in classical systems a more general situation can arise . another family of models exists with the factor measuring the fdt violation given by @xmath417 if @xmath418 and a non - constant function of the auto - correlation @xmath423 if @xmath421 . we expect the arguments put forward in section [ generalfdt ] to apply to this kind of system with minor modifications . it would be of particular interest to see how this structure appears in a concrete model as , for instance , the problem of a particle in a long - range correlated random potential . in the classical case , an intriguing connection between the factor that measures the fdt violation@xcite in the non - equilibrium approach @xmath424 and the parisi function @xmath425 , @xmath426 of the replica analysis in equilibrium , has been noticed and checked in several occasions . the structure of both functions is the same and , on top of this , their explicit values coincide if an argument of `` marginality '' is used to determine @xmath425 in the equilibrium case . in ref . [ ] , several quantum models related , but not equal , to the one considered here were studied with a gaussian variational method and replica theory in the imaginary time matsubara representation . in order to obtain a physical value for the conductivity of the model , giamarchi and le doussal used the marginality condition to fix the replica breaking point parameter @xmath427 , @xmath428 . a careful comparison of the dynamic @xmath377 with the static @xmath429 is now in order . nevertheless , this can not be readily done by comparing the result in ref . [ ] with ours since the way in which both systems are coupled to the environment are not necessarily equivalent . thence , if a formal relation between fdt - violations and the replica @xmath425 exists at the quantum level is an interesting question that deserves further study . the last remark we wish to make about the fdt violations is that in the classical case it has been related to the production of entropy during evolution.@xcite it would be desirable to see whether such a connection also holds at the quantum level . concerning the formalism here developed , it can be extended in several directions . on the one hand , one would like to study models with a spatial structure such as the one associated to the motion of a _ manifold _ of internal dimension @xmath430 in a random quenched potential . this quantum problem has many interesting applications and , in the case of an embedding space with a large dimensionality can be treated , for example , within a dynamic gaussian variational approach.@xcite on the other hand , it would be extremely interesting to study the opposite limiting case of low dimensions and analyze , for example , the real - time dynamics of the ising chain in a transverse field . in addition , one could investigate the effect induced on the dynamics by different environments like considering sub or super ohmic baths , non - linear couplings and even baths of a completely different nature as those generated by spin variables.@xcite the martin - siggia rose generating functional for classical stochastic processes takes a particularly simple form if the time - space is enlarged to a superspace by introducing a couple of grassmann coordinates , and the variables of the problem are encoded in a superfield.@xcite this can also be done for systems with disorder.@xcite the dynamic equations are then written in terms of a single super - correlator that encodes the auto - correlation and response . the equilibrium theorems , viz . causality , invariance under time - translations and the fluctuation - dissipation theorem , follow from the symmetries of the msr effective action written in this way.@xcite the supersymmetric formulation of the classical dynamics has been helpful to find a solution of mean - field like models with an internal dimension like the problem of the manifold in a random media but , most importantly , it has highlighted the formal connection between the out of equilibrium formalism and the replica approach to the statics . it would be very interesting to identify a supersymmetric structure in the quantum problem , probably at the level of the keldysh - schwinger generating functional . this could provide a means to establish a relation between the quantum dynamic formalism here presented and the quantum replica approach . we believe that an analytical study of aging effects along the lines presented in this paper will be relevant in the understanding of realistic glassy systems . indeed , even at very low temperatures , where quantum effects are important , a glass is a non - equilibrium system that evolves over many orders of magnitude in time.@xcite aging effects , demonstrating this non - equilibrium evolution , have been observed with , for example , burning hole experiments in organic glasses ( see ref . [ ] and references therein ) . in the context of magnetic disordered systems with explicit quenched disorder like liho@xmath2y@xmath3f@xmath4 , a great effort has been devoted to the study of the quantum phase transition and the dynamics close to the quantum critical point . it would be interesting to perform dynamic measurements in the glassy phase of these compounds to search for aging effects and check if a scenario as the one here discussed with , for example , a two step relaxation of correlation functions and fdt violations is also present . another area of research where the relevance of quantum effects in the very low temperature dynamics is currently under study are systems of magnetic nano - particles such as @xmath431fe@xmath6o@xmath432 particles ( maghemite ) embedded in a silica matrix . the search for a non - stationary evolution in samples at small concentrations ( @xmath433 ) has given a negative result . @xcite however , in experiments performed at higher temperatures ( where quantum effects are not expected to play an important role ) with samples with a larger concentration ( @xmath434 ) much of the phenomenology of spin - glasses has been recovered.@xcite it is then licit to ask whether there is a region in the temperature - concentration parameter - space where the systems exhibit aging driven by quantum fluctuations . in the area of magnetic nano - particles , a notion of an effective temperature greater than the temperature of the environment was advocated in ref . [ ] and it would be interesting to explore the connection with effective temperature defined in this paper . we have chosen to comment on three kind of materials where effects like the ones obtained in this article might be observed . surely enough , many other glassy systems with or without explicit disorder might exhibit a similar phenomenology . * acknowledgments * we want to especially thank j. kurchan for very useful discussions and constant encouragement during the preparation of this work . we also wish to thank t. evans , a. georges , t. giamarchi , d. grempel , p. le doussal , r. revers , m. rozenberg and e. vincent for useful discussions . at the early stages of this work we have also benefited from discussions with l. bettencourt and h. de vega . the authors want to thank the international center for theoretical physics , trieste , italy for hospitality during the `` summer college in condensed matter on statistical physics of frustrated systems '' . l.f.c . wishes to thank the institute for theoretical physics , university of california at santa barbara for hospitality during the work - shop `` jamming and rheology '' partially supported by the grant no phy94 - 07194 . g.l is financially supported by the ec grant n erbfmbict 961226 . [ appkeldysh ] the generating functional ( [ generating ] ) is more conveniently expressed with the help of path - integrals : @xmath28 & = & \int d{\bbox \phi } \ ; \langle { \bbox \phi } | t^ * \exp\left ( -\frac{i}{\hbar } \int_{0}^\infty dt \ , { \bbox \xi}^-(t ) { \bbox \phi}(t ) \right ) t \exp\left ( \frac{i}{\hbar } \int_{0}^\infty dt \ , { \bbox \xi}^+(t ) { \bbox \phi}(t ) \right ) | \hat \rho(0 ) | { \bbox \phi } \rangle \nonumber\\ & = & \int d{\bbox \phi}d{\bbox \phi}_1 d{\bbox \phi}_2 \ ; \langle { \bbox \phi } | t^ * \exp\left ( -\frac{i}{\hbar } \int_{0}^\infty dt \ , { \bbox \xi}^-(t ) { \bbox \phi}(t ) \right ) \nonumber\\ & & \;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\ ; \langle { \bbox \phi}_1 | t \exp\left ( \frac{i}{\hbar } \int_{0}^\infty dt \ , { \bbox \xi}^+(t ) { \bbox \phi}(t ) \right ) \langle { \bbox \phi}_2 | \hat \rho(0 ) | { \bbox \phi } \rangle \ ; .\end{aligned}\ ] ] the two matrix elements are now expressed as usual feynman path - integrals @xmath28 & = & \int d{\bbox \phi } d{\bbox \phi}_1 d{\bbox \phi}_2 \int_{{\bbox \phi}^+(0)={\bbox \phi}_2}^{{\bbox \phi}^+(\infty)= { \bbox \phi}_1 } { \cal d}{\bbox \phi}^+ \int_{{\bbox \phi}^-(0)={\bbox \phi}}^{{\bbox \phi}^-(\infty)= { \bbox \phi}_1 } { \cal d}{\bbox \phi}^- \nonumber\\ & & \exp\left [ \frac{i}{\hbar } \ , \left ( s[{\bbox \phi^+ ] - s [ \bbox \phi^- } ] + \int dt \ , { \bbox \xi}^+ { \bbox \phi}^+ - \int dt \ , { \bbox \xi}^- { \bbox \phi}^- \right ) \right ] \;\ ; \langle { \bbox \phi}_2 | \hat \rho(0 ) | { \bbox \phi } \rangle \ ; .\end{aligned}\ ] ] the first integrals @xmath435 , etc . are standard while we denote @xmath436 the path - integrals . the doubling of degrees of freedom @xmath437 is a consequence of having two matrix elements , one for each source @xmath438 . formally this expression is rewritten as @xmath28 & = & \int { \cal d}{\bbox \phi}^+ \int { \cal d}{\bbox \phi}^- \exp\left [ \frac{i}{\hbar } \ , \left ( s[{\bbox \phi^+ ] - s [ \bbox \phi^- } ] + \int dt \ , { \bbox \xi}^+ { \bbox \phi}^+ - \int dt \ , { \bbox \xi}^- { \bbox \phi}^- \right ) \right ] \nonumber\\ & & \;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\ ; \times \langle { \bbox \phi}^+ | \hat \rho(0 ) | { \bbox \phi}^- \rangle \ ; .\end{aligned}\ ] ] [ appfdt ] in this appendix we recall the quantum fluctuation - dissipation theorem . proofs and descriptions of this theorem can be found in several textbooks.@xcite we express it in the time - domain in a form that we use in section [ equilibriumdynamics ] to show that the dynamic equations are compatible with a tti - fdt ansatz . we also write it in a mixed time - fourier notation that gives us insight as to how extend it to the case of glassy non - equilibrium dynamics . if at time @xmath211 the system is characterized by a density functional @xmath439 , the two - time correlation functions read @xmath440 \label{corr}\ ] ] where the time - dependent operators , in the heisenberg representation , are defined as @xmath441 the trace is defined in the usual way , @xmath442 \equiv \sum_\alpha \langle \psi_\alpha | \bullet | \psi_\alpha \rangle$ ] , with @xmath443 an orthonormal basis in fock space . the normalization is given by @xmath444 $ ] . since operators do not commute , the quantum two - time auto - correlation functions are not symmetric in times @xmath445 one thus defines the symmetrized and antisymmetrized correlation functions : @xmath446}(t , t ' ) & = & \frac12 \ , \langle a(t ) b(t ' ) - b(t ' ) a(t ) \rangle \ ; , \end{aligned}\ ] ] respectively . in linear response theory @xmath447 ( see eq . ( [ respdef ] ) for the definition ) and the correlation @xmath448}(t , t')$ ] are related by the kubo formula @xmath449 \ , \rangle = \frac{2 i}{\hbar } \ ; \theta(t - t ' ) \ , c_{[a , b]}(t , t ' ) \label{fdtasym } \ ; .\ ] ] if the system has reached equilibrium with a heat - bath at temperature @xmath31 at time @xmath211 , the density functional @xmath439 is just the boltzmann factor @xmath450 . it is then immediate to show that , in equilibrium , time - translation invariance holds @xmath451 in addition , eq . ( [ corr ] ) with @xmath452 imply the kms condition @xmath453 using now the kms properties and assuming , for definiteness , that @xmath454 it is easy to verify the following equation @xmath455 where @xmath456 . this is a way to express fdt through an analytic continuation to complex times that we use in section [ equilibriumdynamics ] to show that a tti and fdt solution holds in the paramagnetic phase . in terms of the fourier transformed @xmath457 defined by @xmath458 the kms relations read @xmath459 and lead to the following relation between fourier transforms of the correlation functions : @xmath460}(\omega ) & = & \left(1 - \exp(-\beta \hbar \omega ) \right ) \ , c_{ab}(\omega ) \ ; , \nonumber\\ 2 c_{\{a , b \}}(\omega ) & = & \left(1 + \exp(-\beta \hbar \omega ) \right ) \ , c_{ab}(\omega ) \ ; , \nonumber\\ c_{[a , b]}(\omega ) & = & \tanh\left ( \frac{\beta \hbar \omega}{2 } \right ) \ , c_{\{a , b \}}(\omega ) \ ; .\end{aligned}\ ] ] back in eq . ( [ fdtasym ] ) this implies fdt @xmath461 using @xmath462 one has @xmath463 from which we obtain the real and imaginary relations @xmath464 if @xmath465 , @xmath466 and eq . ( [ fdtfourier ] ) becomes the classical fdt : @xmath467 with @xmath468 . in the zero temperature limit , and for @xmath469 , fdt reads @xmath470 a finite integrated response @xmath471 implies @xmath472 . in the glassy model we study in the paper , below @xmath283 , the response and correlation turn out to be the sum of two contributions . one is a stationary part that satisfies fdt . since one expects it to yield a finite contribution to the susceptibility @xmath264 , one must have : @xmath473 thus , the stationary part of the correlation function oscillates around zero or , in other words , the full correlation oscillates around @xmath218 at zero temperature . this is observed in the numerical solution to the dynamic equations . [ classicallimit ] the classical limit can be checked at every stage of the calculation . we shall here show how one can recover ( i ) the martin - siggia - rose ( msr ) action from the keldysh - shwinger ( ks ) action ( [ action1 ] ) ; ( ii ) the equations of motion , for the classical correlation and response from the equations of motion for their quantum partners . this appendix is intended for readers already familiar with the msr formalism . we refer to ref . [ ] for a detailed description of the method . let us identify , in the limit @xmath474 , the quantum linear combinations on the left with the classical variables on the right @xmath475 in the classical limit @xmath476 , and when the cut - off tends to infinity , the kernels @xmath74 and @xmath73 become @xmath477 with these identifications , we establish a connection between the ks and the msr actions . the friction and thermal terms become @xmath478 by calling @xmath96 we recover two terms of the msr action . the kinetic and constraint terms reduce to @xmath479 by calling @xmath480 and @xmath481 the last two terms impose the spherical constraint and are usually included in the path - integral measure , while the second term is the one left in the msr action : @xmath482 finally , the terms that depend upon disorder become @xmath483 - v[{\bbox \sigma^- } , j ] = - \int_0^\infty dt \ ; i\hat{\bbox s } \ , \frac{\delta v[{\bbox s } , j ] } { \delta { \bbox s } } \ ; .\ ] ] putting everything together , in the large friction limit @xmath484 such that one neglects the second derivative terms in the kinetic part of the action , one recovers the usual msr action for the langevin dynamics of the classical model in a thermal bath at temperature @xmath31 : @xmath485 } { \delta { \bbox s}(t ) } i \hat{\bbox s}(t ) \right ] \ ; .\ ] ] in order to study the classical limit of the dynamic equations ( [ schwingerr ] ) and ( [ schwingerc ] ) we recognize the classical limit of the correlation and response as follows : @xmath486 in a similar way , it is now easy to verify that the classical dynamic equation for the @xmath0-spin model follow from the @xmath487 limit of eqs . ( [ schwingerr ] ) and ( [ schwingerc ] ) . [ integrals ] integrals over time windows spanning the interval @xmath488 $ ] appear in the dynamic equations ( [ schwingerr ] ) and ( [ schwingerc ] ) . in the large times limit we approximate them in the way we here describe . integrals of the form @xmath489 appear , for example , in @xmath123 . the idea is to separate the integration time - interval as @xmath490 = [ 0,\delta ] \;\ ; u \;\ ; [ \delta , t^- ] \;\ ; u \;\ ; [ t^-,t ] \ ; .\ ] ] if @xmath249 is chosen to be a finite time , all functions can be approximated by @xmath491 that vanishes when @xmath492 . since the integration interval is finite , this term can be neglected . in the second interval the functions vary in the aging regime and in the third interval they vary in the stationary regime . thus @xmath493 \ ; . \nonumber\\\end{aligned}\ ] ] we assume that this separation is sharp and that we can neglect the corrections associated to mixing of the three regimes . in the third term we replaced @xmath299 and @xmath300 in terms of @xmath494 , @xmath495 . since in all cases either @xmath299 or @xmath300 is proportional to the response , we can neglect the first term using the property ( [ finitetimes ] ) of the weak long - term memory scenario . we can then replace the lower limit of the second integral by @xmath219 and the upper limit of the second integral by @xmath193 . in addition , assuming that @xmath300 is proportional to the response , @xmath496 this yields @xmath497 another type of integrals is : is @xmath498 in particular , if @xmath499 , @xmath500 and @xmath501 , this integrals yields the susceptibility . let us assume that @xmath193 and @xmath211 are far apart ; we start as for the first type of integrals , by dividing the time interval in three subintervals @xmath502 = [ t',t'^+ ] \;\ ; u \;\ ; [ t'^+,t^- ] \;\ ; u \;\;[t^-,t]\ ] ] and by approximating the functions by their functional form inside each of the intervals : @xmath503 in the first term @xmath504 can be replaced by @xmath505 . the same applies to @xmath299 in the last term . all functions vary fast in the stationary regime but very slowly in the aging regime . the next assumption is that functions in the aging regime that are convoluted with functions in the stationary regime , can be considered to be constant and taken out of the integral . that is to say @xmath506 where we used @xmath507 and @xmath508 . typically , @xmath509 and @xmath510 are proportional to the response function . using fdt the integrals in the first and third term can then be performed in the classical limit or they can be expressed as functions of the correlation in the quantum case . the second term instead depends exclusively on the aging dynamic sector . e - mail address : [email protected] e - mail address : [email protected] unit propre du cnrs , associe lecole normale suprieure et luniversit de paris sud . unit de recherche des universits paris 11 et 6 associe au cnrs . l. lundgren , p. svedlindh , p. nordblad and o. beckmann , phys . lett . * 51 * , 911 ( 1983 ) . e. vincent , j. hammann , m. ocio , j.p . bouchaud and l. f. cugliandolo , _ slow dynamics and aging _ in sitges conference on glassy systems , m. rub ed . ( springer - verlag , 1997 ) , cond - mat/9607224 . f. alberici , p. doussineau and a. levelut , j. phys . i france * 7 * , 329 ( 1997 ) ; europhys . lett . * 39 * 329 ( 1997 ) . f. alberici - kious , j - p bouchaud , l. f. cugliandolo , p. doussineau and a. levelut , _ aging in _ ta@xmath432 : _ a domain growth interpretation _ , cond - mat/9805208 . a. j. bray and m. a. moore , j. phys . * c17 * , l463 ( 1984 ) and in _ heidelberg colloquium on glassy dynamics _ , lecture notes in physics * 275 * , ed . j. l. van hemmen and i. morgenstern ( springer - verlag , berlin ) . g.j . koper and h.j . hilhorst , j. phys . ( france ) * 49 * , 429 ( 1988 ) . d.s . fisher and d.a . huse , phys . lett . * 56 * , 1601 ( 1986 ) ; phys . rev . * b38 * , 373 ( 1988 ) . v. dotsenko , j. phys . * c18 * , 6023 ( 1985 ) . v. dotsenko , m. feigelman and l. b. ioffe , _ spin - glasses and related problems _ , soviet scientific reviews * 15 * ( harwood 1990 ) . m. v. feigelman and v. vinokur , j. phys . i ( france ) * 49 * , 1731 ( 1988 ) . g. parisi , phys . lett . * 79 * , 3660 ( 1997 ) . w. kob and j - l barrat , phys . * 78 * , 4581 ( 1997 ) . a. barrat , phys . rev . * e57 * , 3629 ( 1998 ) . h. yoshino , _ aging dynamics of an elastic string diffusing in a disordered media _ , cond - mat/9802283 . j - l barrat and w. kob , _ fluctuation dissipation ratio in an aging lennard - jones glass _ , cond - mat/9806027 . t. d. kirkpatrick and d. thirumalai , phys . * b36 * , 5388 ( 1987 ) . t. r. kirkpatrick and p. wolynes , phys . rev . * a35 * , 3072 ( 1987 ) ; phys * b36 * , 8552 ( 1987 ) . t. r. kirkpatrick , d. thirumalai , p. g. wolynes ; phys . rev . * a40 * , 1045 ( 1989 ) . j - p bouchaud , l. f. cugliandolo , j. kurchan and m. mzard , _ out of equilibrium dynamics in spin - glasses and other glassy systems _ , in spin - glasses and random fields , a. p. young ed . ( world scientific , singapore , 1997 ) , cond - mat/9702070 . w. wu , b. ellmann , t. f. rosenbaum , g. aeppli and d. h. reich , phys . * 67 * , 2076 ( 1991 ) . w. wu , d. bitko , t. f. rosenbaum and g. aeppli , phys . lett . * 71 * , 1919 ( 1993 ) . t. f. rosenbaum , j. phys . * c8 * , 9759 ( 1996 ) . e. courtens , j. phys.lett . ( paris ) * 43 * , l199 ( 1982 ) ; phys . lett . * 52 * , 69 ( 1984 ) . e. matsushita , t. matsubara , prog . . phys . * 71 * , 235 ( 1984 ) . r. pirc , b. tadic and r. blinc , z. phys . * b61 * , 69 ( 1985 ) ; phys . rev . * b36 * , 8607 ( 1987 ) . p. shukla and s. singh , phys . rev . * b23 * , 4661 ( 1981 ) . a. j. bray and m. a. moore , * 13 * l665 ( 1985 ) . k. d. usadel , solid state commun . * 58 * , 629 ( 1986 ) . t. yamamoto and h. ishii , j. phys . * c20 * , 6053 ( 1987 ) . y. y. godschmidt and p. y. lai , phys . 64 * , 2467 ( 1990 ) . y. y. godschmidt , phys . rev . * b41 * , 4858 . v dobrosavljevic and d thirumalai , j. phys . * a23 * , l767 ( 1990 ) . l. de cesare , k. lubierska - walasek , i. rabuffo and k. walasek , physica * a214 * , 499 ( 1995 ) ; j. phys . * a29 * , 1605 ( 1996 ) . t. k. kope , phys . rev . * b54 * , 3367 ( 1996 ) . h. rieger and a. p. young , _ quantum spin - glasses _ ( springer - verlag , berlin , 1996 ) , cond - mat/9607005 . r. n. bhatt , _ quantum spin - glasses _ , in spin - glasses and random fields , a. p. young ed . ( world scientific , singapore , 1997 ) . c. p. martin , e. siggia and h. a. rose , phys . * a8 * , 423 ( 1973 ) . h. k. janssen , z. phys . * b23 * , 377 ( 1976 ) ; _ dynamics of critical phenomena and related topics _ , lecture notes in physics * 104 * , c. p. enz ed . , ( springer - verlag , berlin , 1979 ) . the relevance of the quantum langevin equation has been extensively treated in the literature . some references are g. w. ford , m. kac and m. mazur , j. math . phys . * 6 * , 504 ( 1965 ) . g. w. ford and m. kac , j. stat . phys * 46 * , 803 ( 1987 ) . t. jonsson , j. mattsson , c. djurberg , f. a. kahn , p. nordblad and p. svedlindh , phys . lett . * 75 * , 4138 ( 1995 ) . t. jonsson , j. mattsson , p. nordblad , p. svedlindh , j. magn . magn . mat . * 168 * , 269 ( 1997 ) Abstract:

Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.

Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered . Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video . Paper: hamilton cycles occupy a position of central importance in graph theory , and are the subject of countless results . the most famous is of course dirac s theorem @xcite , which states that a hamilton cycle can always be found in any @xmath1-vertex graph with all degrees at least @xmath7 . much more work has been done to determine conditions for hamiltonicity in graphs , digraphs , hypergraphs , and random and pseudo - random instances of these objects . see , e.g. , any of @xcite . there has also been a long history of research concerning conditions for the existence of multiple edge - disjoint hamilton cycles . indeed , nash - williams discovered that the dirac condition already guarantees not just one , but at least @xmath8 edge - disjoint hamilton cycles . his questions in @xcite started a line of investigation , leading to recent work by christofides , khn , and osthus @xcite , who answered one of his conjectures asymptotically by proving that minimum degree @xmath9 is already enough to guarantee @xmath10 edge - disjoint hamilton cycles . for random graphs , these `` packings '' with hamilton cycles are even more complete . bollobs and frieze @xcite showed that for every fixed @xmath11 , one can typically find @xmath11 edge - disjoint hamilton cycles in the random graph process as soon as the minimum degree reaches @xmath12 . kim and wormald @xcite established a similar result for random @xmath11-regular graphs , proving that such graphs typically contain @xmath13 edge - disjoint hamilton cycles . the previous statements are of course best possible , but invite the natural question of what happens when @xmath11 is allowed to grow . along these lines , frieze and krivelevich showed in @xcite that one can pack @xmath14 hamilton cycles in @xmath15 , up to @xmath16 , where @xmath17 is the minimum degree of the graph . for large @xmath6 , they discovered in @xcite that one can pack almost all edges into hamilton cycles . this was later improved to essentially the full range of @xmath6 by knox , khn , and osthus @xcite . in the hypergraph setting , the study of this hamilton cycle packing problem was initiated by frieze and krivelevich in @xcite . although the notion of a hamilton cycle in an ordinary graph is clear , there are several ways to generalize the notion to hypergraphs . indeed , for any @xmath18 , we may define a @xmath19-uniform hypergraph @xmath5 to be a _ hamilton cycle of type @xmath20 _ if there is a cyclic ordering of the vertices of @xmath5 so that every edge consists of @xmath19 consecutive vertices , and every pair of consecutive edges @xmath21 in @xmath5 ( according to the natural ordering of the edges ) has @xmath22 . the extreme cases @xmath23 and @xmath24 are the most obvious generalizations of graph hamiltonicity , and cycles of those types are often called _ tight _ and _ loose _ , respectively . in @xcite , the first two authors studied the problem of covering almost all the edges of a given @xmath19-uniform hypergraph with disjoint hamilton cycles of a fixed type @xmath20 . they considered @xmath20 on the looser end of the spectrum , determining sufficient conditions for the cases @xmath25 . however , their methods did not extend to the regime @xmath26 , which seems more difficult . in this paper , we introduce several new techniques which enable us to prove the first results for packing _ tight _ hamilton cycles , i.e. , with @xmath27 . to give the clearest presentation of the new methods involved , we concentrate on the concrete case of 3-uniform hypergraphs , which we refer to as _ 3-graphs _ from now on . our approach can be naturally extended to the general @xmath19-uniform case , but the explanations necessarily become more involved . we focus on 3-graphs with certain pseudo - random properties . consequently , our results will yield corollaries in the standard random 3-graph model , denoted @xmath28 , in which each of the @xmath29 possible edges independently appears with probability @xmath6 . recall that there are several essentially equivalent notions of pseudo - randomness in graphs , most notably the ones involving uniformity of edge distribution , the second eigenvalue , or the global count of 4-cycles . ( see , e.g. , the survey @xcite . ) however , even in ordinary graphs , these global conditions are insufficient for hamilton cycle packing , because hamilton cycles visit every vertex . therefore , even a single non - conforming vertex can doom the entire packing process . this situation can be prevented by localizing the specification of the pseudo - random criteria . importantly , the resulting stronger conditions are still satisfied by the random objects in question . for example , in the graph case , this can be done by controlling the degrees and codegrees ( see , e.g. , @xcite ) . note that this is a special case of the more general notion of controlling the numbers of _ extensions _ to certain specific subgraphs , uniformly over all base sites , instead of just the global number of copies of a certain graph ( @xmath30 , say ) . the following definition generalizes that concept to 3-graphs . [ def:3graph - ext ] let @xmath31 be distinct vertices of a 3-graph @xmath0 , and let @xmath32 be a graph on vertex set @xmath33 $ ] . then , we define @xmath34 to be the number of vertices @xmath35 such that @xmath36 for every edge @xmath37 . * example 1 . * if @xmath38 and @xmath32 is a single edge , then @xmath39 is the number of edges which contain the pair @xmath40 . this can be interpreted as a generalized notion of degree . * example 2 . * in general , if @xmath32 is the complete graph on @xmath41 vertices , then @xmath42 is the number of @xmath43 which simultaneously form edges with all pairs @xmath44 . this can be interpreted as a generalized notion of codegree . we can now state our localized version of pseudo - randomness , which we will later show is satisfied by the random 3-graph @xmath28 * whp * is said to occur _ with high probability _ ( abbreviated * whp * ) , if @xmath45 . ] when @xmath6 is not too small . since we need to control many quantities within certain ranges , we will employ the notation @xmath46 as a shorthand for the pair of inequalities @xmath47 . [ def:3graph - props ] we say that an @xmath1-vertex 3-graph @xmath0 is * @xmath48-uniform * if for every auxiliary graph @xmath32 on @xmath49 vertices and @xmath50 edges , and every choice of distinct vertices @xmath51 , we have @xmath52 * remark . * we do not actually need the full strength of this definition , as will be clear in the proof of lemma [ lem : d ] in section [ sec:3graph ] . indeed , there are only 5 specific graphs @xmath32 with respect to which we require control ( depicted in figure [ fig : gamma ] of section [ sec:3graph ] ) . however , we feel that the description is more succinctly captured in the above statement . the main result of this paper establishes the first known packing result for tight hamilton cycles in pseudo - random hypergraphs . here , and in the rest of this paper , we write @xmath53 if @xmath54 as @xmath55 . [ thm:3graph ] suppose that @xmath1 is a sufficiently large multiple of four , and @xmath56 . then every @xmath57-uniform 3-graph with @xmath1 vertices can have all but at most @xmath58-fraction of its edges covered by a disjoint union of tight hamilton cycles . note that in @xmath28 , for each graph @xmath32 with @xmath50 edges on a set of @xmath59 vertices , the value of @xmath60 has distribution @xmath61}$ ] . so , the chernoff bound in section [ sec : tools ] ( fact [ fact : chernoff ] ) shows that as long as @xmath62 , we have @xmath63 } = o(n^7 ) \cdot \sum_{s=1}^6 { \mathbb{p}\left[{\text{\rm bin}\left[n , p^s\right ] } \neq ( 1 \pm \e ) np^s\right ] } = o(1),\ ] ] giving the following immediate corollary . [ cor:3graph ] suppose that @xmath64 satisfy @xmath65 . then whenever @xmath1 is a multiple of four , @xmath28 can have all but at most @xmath58-fraction of its edges covered by a disjoint union of tight hamilton cycles * whp*. * remark . * although both results are stated for @xmath1 divisible by 4 , we expect that they are true in general . note , however , that a divisibility condition is unavoidable in the general case of packing hamilton cycles of type @xmath20 in @xmath19-uniform hypergraphs , since @xmath20 must divide @xmath1 . along the way , we also prove a new result about packing hamilton cycles in pseudo - random digraphs . the result differs from that in @xcite as our definition of pseudo - randomness is local instead of global , and therefore may be easier to apply in some situations . indeed , the previous result required a minimum degree condition , together with bounds on the edge distributions across almost all cuts . we can now replace the latter conditions with two more local statements the specific conditions that we impose below have been tailored for the task of producing hamilton cycles in digraphs . [ def : digraph - props ] we say that an @xmath1-vertex digraph is * @xmath48-uniform * if it satisfies the following properties : ( i ) : : every vertex @xmath66 has out - degree @xmath67 and in - degree @xmath68 . ( ii ) : : for every pair of distinct vertices @xmath69 , all three of the following quantities are @xmath70 : the number of common out - neighbors @xmath71 , the number of common in - neighbors @xmath72 , and the number of out - neighbors of @xmath66 which are also in - neighbors of @xmath73 . ( iii ) : : given any four vertices @xmath74 , which are all distinct except for the possibility @xmath75 , there are @xmath76 vertices @xmath43 such that @xmath77 , @xmath78 , @xmath79 , @xmath80 are all directed edges . * remark . * it is not clear that this is the minimal set of pseudo - random conditions which enable hamilton cycle packing in directed graphs . we choose the above statements because they naturally arise from our analysis , and are therefore the most convenient for our purposes . importantly , one can easily see that they are satisfied by random digraphs * whp * , as long as the edge probability is not too small . under these easily - verifiable conditions , we are able to prove the following packing result for digraphs , which has the obvious corollary for random digraphs which are not too sparse . [ thm : digraph ] suppose that @xmath81 , and @xmath1 is a sufficiently large even integer . then every @xmath82-uniform digraph can have its edges partitioned into a disjoint union of directed hamilton cycles , except for a set of at most @xmath83-fraction of its edges . although we originally developed this result only as a building block for our 3-graph analysis in section [ sec:3graph ] , we feel it is worth bringing attention to , as it may be of independent interest . in particular , it is easier to apply than its counterpart in @xcite , because our pseudo - randomness conditions are easier to verify . the key insight in the proof of theorem [ thm:3graph ] is the following connection between tight hamilton cycles in @xmath0 and hamilton cycles in an associated digraph . for a random permutation @xmath84 of the vertices of @xmath0 , define an @xmath85-vertex digraph @xmath86 with vertex set @xmath87 . note that each vertex of @xmath86 corresponds to an ordered pair of vertices of @xmath0 , so @xmath86 will have an even number of vertices , since the number of vertices of @xmath0 is a multiple of 4 . place a directed edge from @xmath88 to @xmath89 if and only if both hyperedges @xmath90 and @xmath91 are present in @xmath0 . in this construction , hamilton cycles in @xmath86 give rise to tight hamilton cycles in @xmath0 . to extract edge disjoint hamilton cycles from a digraph @xmath86 with an even number of vertices , we use an approach similar to that taken in @xcite . let @xmath92 be a random permutation of the vertices of @xmath86 with @xmath93 , and define @xmath94 and @xmath95 . define a bipartite graph @xmath96 with bipartition @xmath97 , and place an edge between @xmath98 and @xmath99 whenever @xmath100 and @xmath101 are both edges of @xmath86 . now perfect matchings in @xmath32 give rise to hamilton cycles in @xmath86 , and previous approaches in @xcite show how to pack perfect matchings in pseudo - random bipartite graphs . however , not all hamilton cycles in @xmath86 arise from perfect matchings in one particular @xmath32 . similarly , not all hamilton cycles in @xmath0 arise from hamilton cycles in a single @xmath86 . we overcome both obstacles with the same iterative approach , which we illustrate for the hypergraph packing . roughly speaking , instead of stopping after generating a single @xmath86 , we sequentially generate digraphs @xmath102 in the above manner , extracting a large set of edge disjoint directed hamilton cycles from each , and deleting the corresponding edge - disjoint hamilton cycles from @xmath0 . at each step , we verify that the pseudo - random properties are maintained . we repeat the process until we have packed the required number of cycles . since the digraph packing and hypergraph packing proofs are essentially independent ( though similar ) , we separate them into sections [ sec : digraph ] and [ sec:3graph ] , respectively . all required concentration inequalities are collected in section [ sec : tools ] for the reader s convenience . the final section contains some concluding remarks and open problems . we will implicitly assume throughout that @xmath103 are small , e.g. , less than @xmath104 . our results have them tending to zero . the following ( standard ) asymptotic notation will be utilized extensively . for two functions @xmath105 and @xmath106 , we write @xmath107 or @xmath108 if @xmath109 , and @xmath110 or @xmath111 if there exists a constant @xmath112 such that @xmath113 for all sufficiently large @xmath1 . we also write @xmath114 if both @xmath115 and @xmath116 are satisfied . all logarithms will be in base @xmath117 . we recall the chernoff bound for exponential concentration of the binomial distribution . the following formulation appears in , e.g. , @xcite . [ fact : chernoff ] for any @xmath118 , there exists @xmath119 such that any binomial random variable @xmath120 with mean @xmath121 satisfies @xmath122 } < e^{-c_\epsilon \mu},\ ] ] where @xmath123 is a constant determined by @xmath124 . when @xmath125 , we may take @xmath126 . a binomial random variable is the sum of independent indicator variables . we also need concentration in settings which are still product spaces , but are somewhat more complicated than simple binomials . a random variable @xmath127 defined over an @xmath1-dimensional product space @xmath128 is called @xmath5-lipschitz if changing @xmath129 in any single coordinate affects the value of @xmath127 by at most @xmath5 . the hoeffding - azuma inequality ( see , e.g. , @xcite ) provides concentration for these distributions . [ fact : azuma ] let @xmath120 be a @xmath5-lipschitz random variable on an @xmath1-dimensional product space . then for any @xmath130 , @xmath131 } | > t \right ] } \leq 2 \exp\left\ { -\frac{t^2}{2 c^2 n } \right\}.\ ] ] we also need concentration in settings where the probability space is not a simple @xmath1-dimensional product space , but rather the set of permutations on @xmath1 elements . the following concentration inequality can be found in , e.g. , section 3.2 of @xcite or lemma 11 of @xcite . [ fact : conc - perm ] let @xmath120 be a random variable on the uniformly distributed probability space of permutations on @xmath1 elements , and let @xmath5 be a real number . suppose that whenever @xmath132 differ by a single transposition , @xmath133 . then , @xmath134 } \right| \geq t\right ] } \leq 2\exp\left\ { -\frac{2t^2}{c^2 n } \right\}.\ ] ] in this section , we show how to complete the outline in section [ sec : overview ] for hamilton cycle packing in digraphs . recall that the main idea in this part is to reduce the problem to packing perfect matchings in bipartite graphs . we begin by showing how to achieve the final step . here , we will show that we can efficiently decompose a suitably uniform bipartite graph into perfect matchings . this is contained in the following proposition , whose statement is very similar to lemma 6 of @xcite . for completeness , we provide a slightly different proof here . [ prop : graph ] let @xmath135 be a bipartite graph with parts @xmath136 and @xmath137 , each of size @xmath138 . suppose that @xmath139 are given such that every vertex has degree @xmath140 , and every pair of distinct vertices has codegree at most @xmath141 . also assume that @xmath142 . then the edges of @xmath135 can be partitioned into the disjoint union @xmath143 , where @xmath144 and each @xmath145 with @xmath146 is a perfect matching . we mentioned in the introduction that although pseudo - randomness can be deduced from the global 4-cycle count , local conditions are required to pack spanning objects such as hamilton cycles or perfect matchings . for bipartite graphs , the above proposition s conditions on codegrees and degrees provide this localized property . indeed , the concentrated codegree condition implies the global bound on the number of 4-cycles , simply by summing over all vertex pairs . the following lemma converts this into a suitable bound on the uniformity of edge distribution another pseudo - random property , which we actually need to complete this proof . [ lem : flow - prelim ] let @xmath135 be a bipartite graph with parts @xmath136 and @xmath137 , each of size @xmath138 . let @xmath120 and @xmath147 be subsets of @xmath136 and @xmath137 , respectively , with @xmath148 and @xmath149 . suppose that @xmath103 are given such that every vertex in @xmath120 has degree @xmath140 , and every pair of distinct vertices in @xmath120 has codegree at most @xmath141 . then @xmath150 . * * let @xmath151 and @xmath152 . for each vertex @xmath153 , let @xmath154 denote the number of neighbors @xmath155 has in @xmath120 . define the random variable @xmath156 by sampling a uniformly random vertex @xmath153 , and setting @xmath157 . since every vertex in @xmath120 has degree at least @xmath158 , we have @xmath159 , and so @xmath160 } \geq ( 1-\epsilon ) xp$ ] . from the codegree condition , the number of labeled paths of length 2 from @xmath120 to @xmath120 is at most @xmath161 . this quantity is also equal to @xmath162 so @xmath163 . therefore , @xmath164 } \leq ( 1+\epsilon ) ( x^2 p^2 + xp)$ ] , which is at most @xmath165 since we assumed @xmath166 . this implies that @xmath167 } = { \mathbb{e}\left[z^2\right ] } - { \mathbb{e}\left[z\right]}^2 \leq 5\epsilon(xp)^2 $ ] , and this low variance will allow us to conclude that vertices in @xmath147 can not have an average @xmath168 which is too low . formally , if we assume for contradiction that @xmath169 , then jensen s inequality gives ( here , @xmath170 is a shorthand for @xmath160}$ ] ) : @xmath171 } & \geq & \left ( { \mathbb{e}\left[z-\overline{z } \mid v \in y\right ] } \right)^2 \\ & = & \left ( \frac{e(x , y)}{|y| } - \frac{e(x , b)}{|b| } \right)^2 \\ & \geq & \left ( ( 3\epsilon^{1/3 } - \epsilon)(xp ) \right)^2 \\ & > & 5 \epsilon^{2/3 } ( xp)^2.\end{aligned}\ ] ] yet a uniformly random vertex in @xmath137 lies in @xmath147 with probability at least @xmath172 , so @xmath173 } \geq { \mathbb{e}\left[(z-\overline{z})^2 \mid v \in y\right ] } \cdot { \mathbb{p}\left[v \in y\right ] } > 5\epsilon ( xp)^2,\ ] ] contradiction . @xmath174 now that we know the edges are distributed fairly uniformly , we can prove the packing result using the maxflow - mincut theorem . * proof of proposition [ prop : graph ] . * first , observe that if we can pack @xmath175 edge - disjoint perfect matchings into @xmath135 , then the proportion of unused edges is at most @xmath176 we will use the maxflow - mincut theorem to show that we can indeed pack @xmath19 matchings . observe that one can pack @xmath19 edge - disjoint perfect matchings in @xmath135 if and only if the following network has an integer flow of size exactly @xmath177 . give each edge in @xmath135 a capacity of 1 , and direct it from @xmath136 to @xmath137 . add a source vertex @xmath178 , with an edge of capacity @xmath19 to each vertex in @xmath136 , and add a sink vertex @xmath179 , with an edge of capacity @xmath19 from each vertex in @xmath137 . clearly , an integer flow of size @xmath177 is achieved if and only if the subset of used edges between @xmath136 and @xmath137 forms a @xmath19-regular graph . since every @xmath19-regular bipartite graph can be decomposed into @xmath19 edge - disjoint perfect matchings , this completes the argument . all capacities are integers , so there is an integer flow which achieves the maximum size . therefore , by the maxflow - mincut theorem , it remains to show that every cut has size at least @xmath177 . consider an arbitrary cut . let @xmath180 be those vertices of @xmath136 which are on the same side as @xmath178 , and let @xmath181 be those vertices of @xmath137 which are on the same side as @xmath179 . let @xmath151 and @xmath182 . therefore , it suffices to establish the following inequality for all choices of @xmath180 and @xmath181 : @xmath183 this is purely an inequality about the original graph @xmath135 . since it is symmetric in @xmath120 and @xmath147 , assume without loss of generality that @xmath184 . we will use lemma [ lem : flow - prelim ] to estimate @xmath185 , but first , we will need to dispose of the boundary cases @xmath186 and @xmath187 , in which it does not apply . in the first case , observe that we automatically have @xmath188 as well , so @xmath189 is already at least @xmath177 . ( we may assume @xmath190 . ) in the second case , note that if @xmath191 , then @xmath189 is already at least @xmath177 . so , we may assume that @xmath192 . yet every vertex in @xmath120 has at least @xmath158 neighbors in @xmath137 , and only at most @xmath193 of them can be outside @xmath147 . therefore , @xmath194 \geq x \cdot \left [ ( 1-\epsilon)mp - \frac{1}{\epsilon p } \right ] \geq x \cdot ( 1 - 2\epsilon^{1/3})mp,\ ] ] since we assumed that @xmath195 . yet the final quantity exceeds @xmath196 , so we also have inequality in this case . in all remaining cases , we see that lemma [ lem : flow - prelim ] applies , so @xmath197 the right - hand side is bilinear in @xmath43 and @xmath198 , so it is minimized when @xmath199 . if either of @xmath43 or @xmath198 are 0 , then one of the first two terms is already @xmath177 . on the other hand , if @xmath200 , then the expression is precisely @xmath201 as well . therefore , all cuts in the network have size at least @xmath177 , so by the maxflow - mincut theorem , there is a flow of size @xmath177 , completing the proof . @xmath174 now that proposition [ prop : graph ] allows us to efficiently pack perfect matchings , we can use it as the base to which we reduce the problem of packing hamilton cycles in directed graphs . throughout this section , all directed graphs have no loops , and no repeated edges in the same direction . however , they may have edges in both directions between pairs of vertices . the main objective of this section is to prove theorem [ thm : digraph ] , which allows us to efficiently pack hamilton cycles in digraphs that have the pseudo - random properties specified in definition [ def : digraph - props ] . as mentioned in the proof overview in section [ sec : overview ] , we extract hamilton cycles from digraphs by connecting them to perfect matchings in ordinary graphs . consider the following random procedure , which constructs an undirected bipartite graph @xmath32 from a digraph @xmath86 with an even number of vertices . * procedure 1 . * this takes as input a digraph @xmath86 with an even number of vertices . 1 . generate a random permutation @xmath202 of the vertices of @xmath86 . consider this sequence as two consecutive segments of length @xmath85 , and let @xmath203 and @xmath204 . the graph @xmath32 will be a bipartite graph with parts @xmath136 and @xmath137 . 2 . define _ the successor of @xmath205 _ to be @xmath206 , unless @xmath207 ( in which case the successor is @xmath208 ) or @xmath209 ( in which case it is @xmath210 ) . similarly , define _ the predecessor of @xmath205 _ to be @xmath211 , unless @xmath212 ( in which case it is @xmath213 ) , or @xmath214 ( in which case it is @xmath215 ) . 3 . for @xmath216 and @xmath217 , place the edge @xmath218 in @xmath32 if and only if @xmath86 contains both directed edges @xmath219 and @xmath220 , where @xmath221 is the successor of @xmath205 as defined in the previous step . since an edge in @xmath32 corresponds to two edges in @xmath86 , we account for this by defining @xmath222 to be the digraph containing all @xmath223 , for each @xmath224 with @xmath216 . the key observation is that perfect matchings in @xmath32 cleanly correspond to hamilton cycles in @xmath225 . specifically , given a perfect matching @xmath112 in @xmath32 , one can recover a hamilton cycle in @xmath225 . indeed , for each @xmath216 , @xmath112 matches @xmath205 to a distinct @xmath226 . so , @xmath227 is a directed hamilton cycle in @xmath225 ; call this the hamilton cycle _ associated with _ @xmath112 . [ lem : hamilton - matching ] let @xmath228 be edge - disjoint perfect matchings in @xmath32 . then their associated hamilton cycles @xmath229 are also edge - disjoint in @xmath225 . * proof . * since @xmath230 and @xmath231 are disjoint , it is clear that @xmath232 and @xmath233 can not overlap on any edges directed from @xmath136 to @xmath137 . on the other hand , if both @xmath234 contain the same edge @xmath235 , where @xmath217 and @xmath236 , then they also both contain @xmath237 , by definition of @xmath234 . then both @xmath238 contain the edge @xmath239 , contradiction . @xmath174 the next step , as we mentioned in the proof overview in the introduction , is to show that the randomly constructed bipartite graph inherits the pseudo - random properties of the initial digraph . [ lem : gamma ] suppose @xmath1 , @xmath6 , and @xmath124 satisfy @xmath240 . let @xmath86 be an @xmath82-uniform digraph on @xmath1 vertices ( @xmath1 even ) , and randomly construct the undirected bipartite graph @xmath32 according to procedure 1 . then , with probability @xmath241 , @xmath32 satisfies all of the following properties : ( i ) : : all degrees are @xmath242 . ( ii ) : : all codegrees between pairs of vertices on the same side of the bipartition are @xmath243 . * proof . * by construction , @xmath32 is a bipartite graph with parts @xmath244 and @xmath245 . there are essentially four claims to prove , as the parts @xmath136 and @xmath137 are not constructed symmetrically . * claim 1 : degrees in @xmath246 are correct . * to show this , for an arbitrary vertex @xmath66 , define a random variable @xmath247 as follows . let @xmath73 be the successor of @xmath66 , as defined in step 2 of procedure 1 . @xmath247 is of no interest when @xmath248 but allowing @xmath248 makes the proof a trifle simpler . by definition , @xmath66 and @xmath73 are either both in @xmath136 or both in @xmath137 ; let @xmath247 be the number of vertices @xmath43 in the other part such that both @xmath77 and @xmath78 are edges of @xmath86 . note that @xmath247 is actually the degree of @xmath66 in @xmath32 if @xmath66 happens to end up in @xmath136 . therefore , it suffices to show that @xmath249 with probability @xmath250 . note that the random variable @xmath247 is completely determined by the permutation @xmath178 . expose @xmath178 in stages . first , expose which index @xmath251 has @xmath252 . next , expose the identity of the vertex @xmath73 which is the successor of @xmath66 . this determines @xmath205 and @xmath221 , where @xmath253 is either @xmath254 , @xmath255 , or @xmath256 . conditioned on these , the associations to the remaining vertices @xmath257 are a uniform permutation over the remaining @xmath258 vertices . yet the last part of property ( ii ) for @xmath82-uniformity shows that in @xmath86 , the number of vertices @xmath43 with @xmath77 and @xmath78 in @xmath86 is @xmath259 . as each @xmath43 will land in the part opposite @xmath260 with probability exactly @xmath261 , we immediately have @xmath262 } = ( 1 \pm 2\epsilon)\frac{np^2}{2}$ ] . for concentration , we use fact [ fact : conc - perm ] . we already conditioned on @xmath66 and @xmath73 , so the remaining randomness is from a uniformly random permutation of @xmath258 elements . transposing two of those elements can only change @xmath247 by at most 1 , so by fact [ fact : conc - perm ] , @xmath247 deviates from its expectation by @xmath263 with probability at most @xmath264 therefore , @xmath247 is indeed @xmath265 with probability @xmath266 , as desired . * claim 2 : degrees in @xmath267 are correct . * consider an arbitrary vertex @xmath73 . let @xmath268 be the set of ordered pairs of distinct vertices @xmath269 with @xmath270 . by property ( i ) of @xmath271-uniformity , @xmath73 has @xmath272 in - neighbors , and @xmath273 out - neighbors . since @xmath274 , this implies that @xmath275 . let @xmath276 be the number of these pairs that , after the permutation @xmath178 , have the additional properties that * ( i ) * both @xmath43 and @xmath198 are on the opposite side of the bipartition to @xmath73 , and * ( ii ) * @xmath198 is the successor of @xmath43 . it suffices to show that @xmath276 is @xmath277 with probability @xmath266 , because @xmath276 is precisely the degree of @xmath73 whenever @xmath73 happens to end up in @xmath137 . for this , we employ the same strategy as used in the previous claim . first expose the index @xmath251 for which @xmath278 . then , the locations of the remaining vertices are uniformly permuted amongst the remaining @xmath279 positions . for a given ordered pair @xmath280 , the probability that @xmath43 lands on the opposite side of @xmath73 is precisely @xmath281 . then , conditioned on this , the probability that @xmath198 is the successor of @xmath43 is precisely @xmath282 . therefore , @xmath283 } = |s_b| \cdot \frac{n/2}{n-1 } \cdot \frac{1}{n-2 } = ( 1 \pm 4\epsilon ) \frac{np^2}{2}.\ ] ] for concentration , we again expose @xmath73 first , and then consider the resulting @xmath284-permutation . consider two such permutations @xmath178 and @xmath285 differing only on a single transposition . transposing two of those elements can only change @xmath276 by at most 4 , so by fact [ fact : conc - perm ] , the probability that @xmath276 deviates by over @xmath286 from its expectation is at most @xmath287 as before . hence @xmath276 is indeed @xmath242 with the desired probability @xmath266 . * claim 3 : co - degrees in @xmath246 are correct . * this is similar to claim 1 . fix any two distinct vertices @xmath66 and @xmath73 , and let @xmath288 and @xmath289 be their respective successors as defined in step 1 of procedure 1 . note that we may have @xmath75 or @xmath290 , but not both . let @xmath291 be the number of vertices @xmath43 such that @xmath43 is on the opposite side of @xmath66 , and @xmath292 . expose the indices @xmath293 for which @xmath252 and @xmath294 , and expose their successors @xmath288 and @xmath289 . the remaining vertices are uniformly permuted over the remaining @xmath295 positions ( or @xmath296 positions if @xmath297 or @xmath298 , although the argument will be the same ) . by property ( iii ) of @xmath82-uniformity , there are @xmath299 candidates for @xmath43 . as each @xmath43 will land in the part opposite @xmath66 with probability either @xmath300 ( if @xmath73 is on the same side as @xmath66 ) or @xmath301 ( if @xmath73 is opposite @xmath66 ) , it follows that @xmath302 } = ( 1 \pm 2\epsilon ) \frac{np^4}{2}$ ] . a transposition in the @xmath303-permutation can only affect @xmath291 by at most 1 , so the probability that @xmath291 deviates from its expectation by over @xmath304 is at most @xmath305 taking a union bound over all pairs @xmath306 yields the desired result . * claim 4 : co - degrees in @xmath267 are correct . * this is similar to claim 2 . fix any two distinct vertices @xmath66 and @xmath73 , and let @xmath307 be the set of ordered pairs of distinct vertices @xmath269 with @xmath308 . by property ( ii ) of @xmath82-uniformity , @xmath66 and @xmath73 have @xmath70 common in - neighbors , and @xmath309 common out - neighbors . since @xmath310 , this implies that @xmath311 . let @xmath291 be the number of these pairs that , after the permutation @xmath178 , have the additional properties that * ( i ) * both @xmath43 and @xmath198 are on the opposite side of the bipartition from @xmath66 , and * ( ii ) * @xmath198 is the successor of @xmath43 . expose the indices @xmath293 for which @xmath252 and @xmath294 ; the remainder is then an @xmath312-permutation over the leftover positions . a similar calculation to claim 2 shows that @xmath302 } = ( 1 \pm 4\epsilon ) \frac{np^4}{2}$ ] , and a similar concentration argument shows that @xmath291 is within @xmath304 of its mean with probability @xmath313 . therefore , a union bound over all @xmath314 completes the proof of this final claim , and the proof of lemma [ lem : gamma ] @xmath174 at this point , we could immediately apply the results of section [ sec : graph ] to pack @xmath32 with perfect matchings , which then correspond to hamilton cycles in @xmath86 . however , it is unfortunate that this would miss most of the edges of @xmath86 , since not all edges of @xmath86 are in correspondence with edges of @xmath32 . the solution is to iterate procedure 1 several times . some care must be taken because the edges of @xmath86 will be covered many times by different @xmath32 . we will specify how to deal with this in procedure 2 below , but first we collect two intermediate results which control this multiplicity over several iterations of procedure 1 . [ lem : gamma - cover ] suppose @xmath1 and @xmath124 satisfy @xmath315 . let @xmath86 be an @xmath82-uniform digraph on @xmath1 vertices ( @xmath1 even ) , and randomly and independently construct @xmath316 graphs @xmath317 according to procedure 1 . let @xmath318 be their corresponding digraphs . then , with probability @xmath319 , every edge of @xmath86 is covered @xmath320 times by the @xmath318 . * fix an arbitrary edge @xmath321 , and let @xmath322 be the probability that it appears in @xmath225 if @xmath32 is constructed according to procedure 1 . since the @xmath318 are independent , the number of times @xmath321 is covered will then be @xmath323}$ ] , and we will use the chernoff bounds to prove concentration . so , let @xmath324 be the permutation which produces @xmath32 , and let @xmath136 and @xmath137 be the two sides of the bipartition as defined in procedure 1 . there are two ways that @xmath321 can appear in @xmath225 : either @xmath325 and @xmath153 and @xmath326 for the successor @xmath327 of @xmath328 , or @xmath329 and @xmath330 and @xmath331 for the predecessor @xmath332 of @xmath155 . these two cases are clearly disjoint , so @xmath333 , where @xmath334 and @xmath335 are the respective probabilities in these two cases . to calculate @xmath334 , the probability that @xmath336 is precisely @xmath337 . conditioned on this , the probability that @xmath153 is precisely @xmath281 . by property ( i ) of @xmath271-uniformity , @xmath338 , so the probability that some out - neighbor of @xmath155 becomes the successor of @xmath328 is @xmath339 . therefore , @xmath340 since @xmath341 . an analogous calculation shows that @xmath342 as well . hence @xmath343 . now , the number of times that @xmath321 is covered by the @xmath318 is precisely @xmath323}$ ] . since @xmath344 , the chernoff bound implies that the probability that the binomial deviates from its mean by more than a factor of @xmath345 is at most @xmath346 taking a union bound over all @xmath347 edges @xmath321 , we obtain the desired result . [ lem : gamma - rare - consec ] suppose @xmath348 . construct @xmath11 independent @xmath349 according to procedure 1 . then with probability @xmath319 , every pair of distinct vertices @xmath350 has the property that @xmath73 is the successor of @xmath66 in at most 5 of the permutations for @xmath349 . * for a fixed pair @xmath306 , the probability that @xmath73 is the successor of @xmath66 in a single run of procedure 1 is exactly @xmath351 . therefore , the probability of this occurring more than 5 times in @xmath11 independent runs is at most @xmath352 . taking a union bound over all pairs @xmath306 , we obtain the result . @xmath174 since a single run of procedure 1 packs very few edges into hamilton cycles , we must repeat the procedure multiple times , deleting the packed edges from @xmath86 after each round . however , it is important to maintain the pseudo - random properties through the iterations , and the set of removed edges after a single run of procedure 1 would be too sparse to control the changes in the pseudo - random counts . the following extension provides one way to achieve this , by repeating procedure 1 enough times to uniformly involve all edges of @xmath86 . * procedure 2 . * this takes as input a digraph @xmath86 with an even number of vertices , and an integer parameter @xmath11 . 1 . independently generate the random undirected bipartite graphs @xmath353 , , @xmath354 according to procedure 1 , and let @xmath355 , @xmath318 , @xmath356 , and @xmath357 be their corresponding permutations , digraphs , and bipartitions , respectively . 2 . for each edge @xmath358 , let @xmath359 . if @xmath360 , then independently select a uniformly random index in @xmath361 to label @xmath321 with . 3 . for each @xmath349 , define a subgraph @xmath362 by keeping each edge @xmath363 ( @xmath364 and @xmath365 ) if and only if both @xmath366 and @xmath367 are labeled by @xmath251 , where @xmath368 is the successor of @xmath66 according to @xmath355 . 4 . for each @xmath251 , let @xmath369 be the digraph containing all @xmath370 , for each @xmath371 , with @xmath372 , where @xmath368 is the successor of @xmath66 according to @xmath355 . observe that the final step ensures that the @xmath369 are all disjoint . so , lemma [ lem : hamilton - matching ] shows that we can work independently on each @xmath369 , packing hamilton cycles by packing perfect matchings in @xmath362 with proposition [ prop : graph ] . after this , we will remove all @xmath369 from @xmath86 , and show that their distribution is sufficiently uniform for us to maintain the necessary pseudo - random properties . the following lemma shows that the @xmath362 themselves are sufficiently pseudo - random for us to apply proposition [ prop : graph ] . [ lem : gamma - prime ] suppose @xmath1 , @xmath6 , and @xmath124 satisfy @xmath373 . let @xmath86 be an @xmath82-uniform digraph on @xmath1 vertices ( @xmath1 even ) , and conduct procedure 2 with @xmath316 . let @xmath374 . then , with probability @xmath319 , every @xmath362 satisfies the following properties : ( i ) : : all degrees are @xmath375 . ( ii ) : : all codegrees between pairs of vertices on the same side of the bipartition are @xmath376 . * proof . * our restrictions on @xmath64 allow us to apply lemmas [ lem : gamma ] and [ lem : gamma - cover ] , so we have that with probability @xmath319 , after step 1 of procedure 2 : ( a ) : : every @xmath349 has all degrees @xmath377 and all same - side codegrees @xmath378 . ( b ) : : every edge in @xmath86 is covered @xmath379 times by the @xmath318 . condition on the above outcome of step 1 , and consider an arbitrary @xmath362 , which is derived from @xmath349 with bipartition @xmath380 . it suffices to show that in the randomness of step 2 , with probability @xmath266 each individual @xmath362 has the desired properties , since @xmath381 by the given restrictions on @xmath64 . there are four cases to consider : degrees in @xmath356 , degrees in @xmath357 , codegrees in @xmath356 , and codegrees in @xmath357 . fortunately , they will all follow by essentially the same argument . we begin with the degree of an arbitrary vertex @xmath382 . by ( a ) above , the degree of @xmath328 in @xmath349 is @xmath383 . note that this actually corresponds to exactly @xmath384 pairs of directed edges in @xmath86 , of the form @xmath385 , and all @xmath386 directed edges involved are distinct . step 2 of procedure 2 assigns labels to all directed edges , and the degree of @xmath328 in @xmath362 is precisely the number of the above pairs of directed edges for which both edges are labeled @xmath251 . since every directed edge is covered @xmath379 times by ( b ) and the edges are labeled independently , the probability that both of a given pair above receive label @xmath251 is @xmath387^{-2}$ ] . therefore , the expected degree of @xmath328 in @xmath362 is @xmath388 . furthermore , since all directed edges involved are distinct , the chernoff bound shows that the probability of the degree deviating from its mean by more than a factor of @xmath389 is at most @xmath390 because @xmath391 . therefore , with probability @xmath313 , the degree of @xmath328 in @xmath362 is @xmath392 . taking a union bound over all @xmath382 establishes part ( i ) for those degrees . the arguments for the other three parts of the lemma are similar . for a vertex @xmath393 , its incident edges in @xmath349 correspond to @xmath394 disjoint pairs of directed edges , so the exact same argument as above produces the bound for these degrees . the codegree of a given pair of vertices @xmath395 corresponds to disjoint quadruples of distinct directed edges . from ( a ) , there are @xmath243 such quadruples . the probability that a given quadruple is completely labeled by @xmath251 is @xmath396^{-4}$ ] by ( b ) , so the expected codegree in @xmath362 is @xmath397 . by the chernoff bound , the probability that the codegree deviates from its expectation by a factor of more than @xmath398 is at most @xmath399 since @xmath400 . taking a union bound over all pairs of vertices @xmath395 produces the desired bound for their codegrees . the argument for codegrees in @xmath357 is similar . @xmath174 the next few lemmas build up to a result which controls how @xmath86 is affected by the deletion of all edges in the @xmath369 . the first one controls the `` first - order '' effect of the deletion process . [ lem : d - delete - out - nbrs ] condition on the first step of procedure 2 covering every edge of @xmath86 @xmath379 times by the @xmath318 . fix any vertex @xmath401 and any set @xmath402 of edges incident to @xmath66 ( all oriented in the same way with respect to @xmath66 ) . suppose that @xmath403 . then with probability @xmath404 , the number of edges of @xmath402 which are covered by the @xmath369 is @xmath405 , * proof . * we start with the case when all edges in @xmath402 are directed out of @xmath66 . let the random variable @xmath406 be the number of these edges which are covered by the @xmath369 . since we conditioned on the first step of procedure 2 , the only remaining randomness is in the independent assignments of the edge labels . we expose these labels in three stages . first , expose the labels of @xmath402 . now each edge @xmath407 has its label @xmath408 , so we can identify its partner edge in @xmath409 which must also receive @xmath408 in order for both to remain in @xmath410 ; let @xmath411 be the set of all partner edges found in this way . next , expose all labels outside @xmath412 . finally , expose the labels of @xmath411 . it is clear that the second stage does not affect @xmath406 at all . thus , after conditioning on the result of the second stage , we are at the following situation : every edge @xmath413 has a label @xmath408 , and it will only still be covered by the @xmath369 if its partner in @xmath409 also receives the label @xmath408 . since its partner is in @xmath379 different @xmath318 , the probability that @xmath414 is covered by @xmath369 is the inverse of this multiplicity ; linearity of expectation then gives @xmath415 } = ( 1 \pm 1.04\epsilon ) \frac{|e|}{\kappa}$ ] . we will use the hoeffding - azuma inequality to show the concentration of @xmath406 . indeed , the third stage exposure is a product space of dimension @xmath416 . consider the effect of changing the label of a single edge @xmath417 . by the definition of @xmath411 , the edge @xmath418 is either some @xmath419 directed into @xmath66 , or some @xmath78 not incident to @xmath66 with @xmath420 . in the latter case , @xmath77 is the only edge of @xmath402 which can be affected by the label of @xmath418 , so @xmath406 can change by at most 1 . for the remaining case @xmath421 , suppose that the label of @xmath418 was changed from @xmath422 to @xmath19 . by construction , only the ( single ) partner edge of @xmath418 in @xmath423 could suffer from changing @xmath418 s label away from @xmath422 ; this could decrease @xmath406 by at most 1 . similarly , only the partner edge of @xmath418 in @xmath424 could benefit from changing @xmath418 s label to @xmath19 , and this would only increase @xmath406 by at most 1 . we conclude that @xmath406 is 1-lipschitz , so the hoeffding - azuma inequality implies that the probability @xmath406 deviates from its expectation by over @xmath425 is at most @xmath426 therefore , with probability @xmath404 , we have @xmath427 , in the case when all edges of @xmath402 are directed out of @xmath66 . the case when all edges are directed into @xmath66 follows by essentially the same argument . @xmath174 the next lemma controls the `` second - order '' effect of the deletion process . [ lem : d - delete - co - out ] fix any distinct vertices @xmath350 and any set @xmath120 of vertices such that either ( i ) : : for all @xmath428 , @xmath429 are edges of @xmath86 ; or ( ii ) : : for all @xmath428 , @xmath430 are edges of @xmath86 ; or ( iii ) : : for all @xmath428 , @xmath431 are edges of @xmath86 . condition on the first step of procedure 2 covering every edge of @xmath86 at least @xmath432 times by the @xmath318 , and on the fact that @xmath73 is the successor of @xmath66 in at most 5 of the permutations . suppose that @xmath433 . then with probability @xmath434 , the number @xmath406 of vertices in @xmath120 which still have both of their designated edges above still covered by the @xmath369 is at most @xmath435 . * proof in situations ( i ) and ( ii ) . * these two cases follow by very similar arguments ; for concreteness , let us begin with ( i ) . let @xmath402 be the set of @xmath436 edges specified in ( i ) . since we conditioned on the first step of procedure 2 , the only remaining randomness is in the independent assignments of the edge labels . we expose these labels in three stages . first , expose the labels of @xmath402 . now each edge @xmath407 has its label @xmath408 , so we can identify its partner edge in @xmath409 ; denote the partner by @xmath437 , and let @xmath411 be the set of all partner edges found in this way . next , expose all labels outside @xmath412 . finally , expose the labels of @xmath411 . it is clear that the second stage does not affect @xmath406 at all . thus , after conditioning on the result of the second stage , we are at the following situation : every edge @xmath407 has a label @xmath408 , and @xmath414 will only still be covered by the @xmath369 if its partner @xmath437 also receives the label @xmath408 . the random variable @xmath406 counts the number of vertices @xmath43 for which both @xmath77 and @xmath438 are still covered by the @xmath369 . note that their partner edges @xmath439 and @xmath440 are distinct unless they both coincide as some @xmath441 . if they are distinct , then clearly the probability of having both receive their correct labels is at most @xmath442 . on the other hand , if they coincide , then we must have that in both permutations @xmath443 and @xmath444 , the vertex @xmath288 is the successor of @xmath66 and @xmath73 . yet @xmath288 has a unique predecessor , so @xmath445 . therefore , it is actually impossible for the ( coincident ) partner edge to receive a label which suits both @xmath77 and @xmath438 , so the probability is 0 . in all cases , we have an upper bound of @xmath442 , so @xmath415 } \leq \frac{|x|}{\kappa^2}$ ] . we use the hoeffding - azuma inequality to probabilistically bound @xmath406 , since the third exposure stage is a product space . consider the effect of changing the label of a single edge @xmath417 . by the definition of @xmath411 , the edge @xmath418 is either some @xmath419 or @xmath78 , or some @xmath441 with @xmath77 and @xmath438 both in @xmath86 . in the latter case , @xmath43 is the only vertex which may have its count in @xmath406 affected , so @xmath406 changes by at most 1 under this perturbation . by symmetry , it remains to consider the case when @xmath421 changes its label from @xmath422 to @xmath19 . by construction , only the partner edge @xmath446 of @xmath418 in @xmath423 could suffer from changing @xmath418 s label away from @xmath422 ; this could potentially lose only @xmath198 in the count of @xmath406 , so @xmath406 would decrease by at most 1 . similarly , only the partner edge of @xmath418 in @xmath424 could benefit from changing @xmath418 s label to @xmath19 , and this could only increase @xmath406 by at most 1 . we conclude that @xmath406 is 1-lipschitz over its product space of dimension @xmath447 , so the azuma - hoeffding inequality implies that the probability that @xmath406 exceeds its expectation by more than @xmath448 is at most @xmath449 this finishes the case when ( i ) holds . the case when ( ii ) holds follows from a directly analogous argument . * proof in situation ( iii ) . * let @xmath402 be the set of @xmath436 edges specified in ( iii ) . we expose the labels in the same three stages as before : first @xmath402 , then the other non - partner edges , and finally the partner edges @xmath411 . again , after the second stage we would be at the following situation : every edge @xmath407 has a label @xmath408 , and a vertex @xmath43 will only be counted toward @xmath406 if the partner edge @xmath439 receives the label @xmath443 , and @xmath450 also receives @xmath451 . however , this time there is an additional complication , because it can happen that one or both of these partner edges have already had their labels exposed . the only way this could happen is if either @xmath452 or @xmath453 . fortunately , we are only seeking an upper bound on @xmath406 , so we only need to determine when this first round exposure already forces a vertex @xmath43 to contribute to @xmath406 . a moment s thought reveals that the only way this can happen is if the first round gave both @xmath77 and @xmath78 the same label @xmath454 , and furthermore , the permutation @xmath455 has @xmath73 as the successor of @xmath66 . now we use the assumption that at most 5 of the permutations @xmath455 satisfy this property . let @xmath456 be the set of the corresponding indices @xmath454 . we can circumvent this issue , by observing that in the first exposure , the number of @xmath43 for which both @xmath77 and @xmath78 receive the same label @xmath457 is stochastically dominated by @xmath458}$ ] . since @xmath459 , the chernoff bound then implies that with probability @xmath404 , the first round has at most @xmath460 `` bad '' @xmath43 which have the potential of being automatically included in the count for @xmath406 . the second round exposure is essentially irrelevant , so we may now condition on the result of the second round satisfying the property in the previous paragraph . as we only need to upper bound @xmath406 , it remains to consider only the `` good '' @xmath43 . from our previous discussion , if a good @xmath43 has , say , the label of @xmath439 already exposed to be @xmath454 then @xmath73 is not the successor of @xmath66 in permutation @xmath454 and so this @xmath43 can not contribute to @xmath406 . also note that the only way for @xmath439 to equal @xmath450 is if both are @xmath461 . if @xmath462 then @xmath248 and if @xmath463 then @xmath464 and so we must have @xmath465 . hence it is not possible for @xmath461 to simultaneously match both labels , and @xmath43 can not contribute to @xmath406 . so , if we let let @xmath147 be the subset of good vertices @xmath428 for which @xmath466 , and neither label has yet been exposed , it remains to control the number @xmath112 of vertices in @xmath147 which contribute to @xmath406 . since each @xmath467 has @xmath468 and their labels are independent , we immediately have @xmath469 } \leq |y| / \kappa^2 $ ] . we show that @xmath112 is concentrated by using the hoeffding - azuma inequality on the third round exposure product space of dimension @xmath470 . consider the effect of changing the label of an edge @xmath471 from @xmath422 to @xmath19 . there are three types of edges in @xmath411 : case 1 : @xmath472 . : : these @xmath418 can only arise as partner edges of some @xmath77 ( possibly several ) . however , @xmath418 has a unique partner edge @xmath77 in @xmath423 , so changing its label away from @xmath422 can only reduce @xmath112 at @xmath43 . similarly , changing it to @xmath19 can only grow @xmath112 at @xmath198 , where @xmath446 is the unique partner edge of @xmath418 in @xmath424 . therefore , @xmath112 can only change by at most 1 . case 2 : @xmath473 . : : by the same argument as case 1 , this can only change @xmath112 by at most 1 . case 3 : @xmath474 . : : these @xmath418 can only arise as partners of either @xmath77 or @xmath475 . clearly , changing @xmath476 can only affect whether @xmath43 or @xmath198 are counted in @xmath112 , so it has an effect of at most 2 . thus @xmath112 is 2-lipschitz , and the hoeffding - azuma inequality shows that the probability it exceeds its expectation by @xmath477 is at most @xmath478 since we conditioned on there being at most @xmath460 bad vertices , we have @xmath479 . putting everything together , we conclude that with probability @xmath480 , @xmath481 , completing the proof . @xmath174 the previous two lemmas now enable us to prove that the pseudo - random properties of the digraph are still maintained after deleting the @xmath369 . [ lem : digraph - delete ] suppose @xmath1 , @xmath6 , and @xmath124 satisfy @xmath482 . let @xmath483 and @xmath484 . let @xmath86 be an @xmath57-uniform digraph on @xmath1 vertices ( @xmath1 even ) , and conduct procedure 2 . let @xmath485 be the subgraph of @xmath86 obtained by deleting all edges covered by any @xmath369 . then , with probability @xmath486 , @xmath485 is an @xmath487-uniform digraph with @xmath488 and @xmath489 . * by applying lemmas [ lem : gamma - cover ] and [ lem : gamma - rare - consec ] , the outcome of step 1 of procedure 2 will satisfy the following two properties with probability @xmath490 . ( the second follows since @xmath491 , and so @xmath348 . ) * every edge of @xmath86 covered @xmath379 times by the @xmath318 . * for any @xmath314 , the vertex @xmath73 is the successor of @xmath66 in at most 5 of the permutations for the @xmath349 . condition on this outcome . we will now show that in the remaining randomness of step 2 , the properties of @xmath487-uniformity are satisfied with probability @xmath319 . we establish them one at a time . * property ( i ) . * consider an arbitrary vertex @xmath66 . by @xmath82-uniformity , it has @xmath272 out - edges in @xmath86 , and @xmath492 . so , we may apply lemma [ lem : d - delete - out - nbrs ] to the set of out - edges of @xmath66 . this shows that with probability @xmath404 , the new out - degree of @xmath66 in @xmath485 , in terms of its original out - degree @xmath493 in @xmath86 , is @xmath494 \\ & = & ( 1 \pm \epsilon ) np \cdot \left ( 1 \pm \frac{1.06\epsilon}{\kappa } \right ) \left ( 1 - \frac{1}{\kappa } \right ) \\ & = & ( 1 \pm \epsilon ' ) np'.\end{aligned}\ ] ] here , we used @xmath495 by @xmath271-uniformity . taking a union bound over all @xmath401 , we obtain the desired result on out - degrees with probability @xmath496 . a similar argument controls all in - degrees . @xmath174 * property ( ii ) . * consider an arbitrary pair of distinct vertices @xmath69 , and let @xmath120 be the set of their common out - neighbors . let @xmath497 be the number of vertices in @xmath428 such that @xmath77 is covered by the @xmath369 , let @xmath498 be the number of @xmath428 such that @xmath438 is covered by the @xmath369 , and let @xmath499 be the number of @xmath428 such that both @xmath77 and @xmath438 are covered by the @xmath369 . clearly , the number of common out - neighbors of @xmath66 and @xmath73 in @xmath485 is exactly @xmath500 , where @xmath71 was the number of their common out - neighbors in @xmath86 . note that @xmath501 by @xmath271-regularity , and @xmath502 . so , lemma [ lem : d - delete - out - nbrs ] implies that with probability @xmath404 , both @xmath497 and @xmath498 are @xmath503 . on the other hand , we also have @xmath504 , so lemma [ lem : d - delete - co - out ] bounds @xmath499 by @xmath505 with probability @xmath480 . therefore , @xmath499 is within @xmath506 additive error of @xmath507 because @xmath508 . putting these bounds together , we have that the new number of common out - neighbors is @xmath509 \\ & = & ( 1 \pm \epsilon ) np^2 \cdot \left ( 1 \pm \frac{2.12\epsilon}{\kappa } \right ) \left ( 1 - \frac{1}{\kappa } \right)^2 \\ & = & ( 1 \pm \epsilon ' ) n(p')^2,\end{aligned}\ ] ] here , @xmath501 by @xmath271-uniformity . taking a union bound over all @xmath350 , we obtain the desired result on the new @xmath71 with probability @xmath510 . similar arguments control the other two parts of property ( ii ) of @xmath487-uniformity . @xmath174 * property ( iii ) . * this is a slight extension of the previous argument . consider any four vertices @xmath74 , which are all distinct except for the possibility @xmath75 . let @xmath120 and @xmath511 be the sets of vertices @xmath43 such that @xmath77 , @xmath78 , @xmath79 , @xmath80 are all in @xmath86 or @xmath485 , respectively . let @xmath497 , @xmath498 , @xmath512 , and @xmath513 be the sets of vertices @xmath428 such that @xmath77 , @xmath78 , @xmath79 , or @xmath80 are still covered by the @xmath514 . define the pairwise intersections @xmath515 . by inclusion - exclusion , we have @xmath516 as in ( ii ) , since @xmath517 ( to apply lemma [ lem : d - delete - out - nbrs ] ) and @xmath518 ( for lemma [ lem : d - delete - co - out ] ) , we have that with probability @xmath480 , each @xmath519 , and each @xmath520 . thus @xmath521 = ( 1 \pm \epsilon ) np^4 \left ( 1 - \frac{4}{\kappa } \pm \frac{4.21\epsilon}{\kappa } \right).\ ] ] here , we used @xmath522 by @xmath271-uniformity . now observe that @xmath523 however , since @xmath508 , the error term is @xmath524 . therefore , we have @xmath525 taking a union bound over all choices of @xmath74 , we obtain the desired result on the new @xmath71 with probability @xmath490 . @xmath174 now we have established control over the pseudo - random properties of the digraph after deletion , as well as over the individual bipartite graphs @xmath362 at each stage . we finally combine all of our lemmas to prove the main result of this section , that pseudo - random digraphs can be efficiently packed with hamilton cycles . * proof of theorem [ thm : digraph ] . * we will iterate procedure 2 , packing all intermediate @xmath369 at each iteration and deleting them from the digraph , until very few edges remain . the total number of iterations will be @xmath526 , so since our previous lemmas hold with probability @xmath319 , a final union bound will show that we achieve the desired packing * whp*. let @xmath527 , @xmath528 , and @xmath529 . define the sequences @xmath530 , @xmath531 via the following recursion : @xmath532 let @xmath533 be the smallest index such that @xmath534 . note that @xmath535 only increases , so @xmath536 also note that since @xmath537 we have in general that @xmath538 . therefore , @xmath539 we now iteratively construct @xmath540 , such that each @xmath541 is @xmath542-uniform . indeed , consider the ( random ) procedure 2 applied to @xmath541 with respect to @xmath543 . let @xmath544 . this produces bipartite graphs @xmath545 and directed graphs @xmath546 with all @xmath546 disjoint . let @xmath547 be the result of deleting all @xmath546 from @xmath541 . to apply lemmas [ lem : gamma - prime ] and [ lem : digraph - delete ] , we must check that @xmath548 . but this follows from our initial assumption that @xmath549 since @xmath550 and @xmath551 . therefore , as the individual failure probabilities of lemmas [ lem : gamma - prime ] and [ lem : digraph - delete ] are @xmath552 and @xmath553 , we may assume that the outcome of procedure 2 satisfies the following properties : ( i ) : : all degrees in each @xmath545 are @xmath554 . ( ii ) : : all codegrees between pairs of vertices on the same side of the bipartition of each @xmath545 are @xmath555 . ( iii ) : : @xmath547 is @xmath556-uniform . fix this outcome . we may apply proposition [ prop : graph ] to each @xmath545 because @xmath557 where we used @xmath558 , @xmath559 , and our initial assumption that @xmath560 . so , every @xmath545 can be packed with edge - disjoint perfect matchings , missing only a @xmath561-fraction of the edges . by lemma [ lem : hamilton - matching ] , these edge - disjoint perfect matchings in @xmath545 correspond to edge - disjoint hamilton cycles in @xmath546 , missing the same fraction of edges since there is a 2-to-1 correspondence between edges in @xmath546 and @xmath545 . we carry on the above procedure until we create @xmath562 . then , we will have packed hamilton cycles in @xmath563 , up to a fractional error of @xmath564 . since @xmath562 is @xmath565-uniform , it has at most @xmath566 edges . as @xmath86 was @xmath271-uniform , it had at least @xmath567 edges . thus @xmath562 itself has at most @xmath568-fraction of the total number of edges . therefore , the fraction of edges of @xmath86 that have not been covered is at most @xmath569 since @xmath570 by inequality . this completes the proof . * the above proof showed that we can pack the edges of @xmath86 with hamilton cycles , up to a fractional error of at most @xmath571 , where @xmath572 . in fact , one can prove the same result for any @xmath573 , and all of the calculations can be recovered by following our proof . indeed , we intentionally introduced a very high level of precision in lemma [ lem : gamma - cover ] . it is clear that the same argument can replace the @xmath574 with @xmath575 , etc . these smaller order errors are what accumulate into the decimal places in the final @xmath576 which appears in lemma [ lem : digraph - delete ] , and which later determines the value of @xmath288 . when @xmath576 is replaced by a constant arbitrarily close to 4 , the above argument produces a result with @xmath288 approaching @xmath577 . this section is organized so that its structure is parallel to the previous section . indeed , their themes are similar , as the objective of this section is to establish another reduction , this time from the hypergraph setting to the digraph setting . the fundamental building block is now the following procedure , which should be compared with procedure 1 . * procedure 3 . * this takes as input a 3-graph @xmath0 with an even number of vertices . 1 . generate a random permutation @xmath202 of the vertices of @xmath0 . split it into @xmath7 successive pairs @xmath578 , @xmath579 , , @xmath580 . 2 . construct a directed graph @xmath86 with @xmath7 vertices , one corresponding to each of the pairs above . place a directed edge from @xmath88 to @xmath89 if and only if both hyperedges @xmath581 and @xmath582 are present in @xmath0 . consider @xmath414 and @xmath418 to be _ partners _ , and introduce the notation @xmath583 and @xmath584 . since a directed edge in @xmath86 corresponds to two hyperedges in @xmath0 , we account for this by defining @xmath585 to be the hypergraph containing all @xmath90 , @xmath586 , for each directed edge from @xmath88 to @xmath587 in @xmath86 . as already noted , hamilton cycles in @xmath86 correspond precisely to tight hamilton cycles in @xmath0 . indeed , the hyperedges corresponding to the directed edges of a hamilton cycle are precisely those which are needed for a tight hamilton cycle in the hypergraph . [ lem : hamilton - di - hyp ] let @xmath588 be edge - disjoint hamilton cycles in @xmath86 . then their associated hamilton cycles @xmath589 in @xmath0 are also edge - disjoint . * proof . * it suffices to show that given a fixed pairing @xmath590 , , @xmath580 from step 1 , any given hyperedge @xmath591 can be associated with at most one directed edge in step 3 . indeed , by construction , some pair of vertices in the hyperedge , say @xmath306 , must be a pair above . if the pair containing @xmath288 is @xmath592 , then the directed edge must be from @xmath306 to @xmath593 , hence unique . similarly , if the pair containing @xmath288 is @xmath594 , then the only possibility is that the directed edge is from @xmath594 to @xmath306 . @xmath174 as in the previous section , our next goal is to show that the result of procedure 3 ( a digraph ) is pseudo - random . the following lemma will be a useful component of the proof . [ lem : pairs - kept ] let @xmath595 be a given set of ordered pairs of distinct vertices @xmath306 , with @xmath596 . then with probability @xmath597 , the number @xmath406 of ordered pairs in @xmath595 which appear in the list of @xmath7 ordered pairs from step 1 of procedure 3 , satisfies @xmath598 . * proof . * the probability that any given @xmath599 appears as an ordered pair in step 1 is precisely @xmath600 . this is because @xmath43 must land in one of the @xmath7 positions of the permutation which correspond to first - vertices of ordered pairs , and then @xmath198 must land in the position immediately following @xmath43 . since @xmath601 , linearity of expectation gives @xmath415 } = \big ( 1 \pm \frac{\epsilon}{2 } \big ) \frac{|s|}{2n}$ ] . for concentration , we apply fact [ fact : conc - perm ] . suppose the permutation @xmath178 is converted to @xmath285 via the single transposition of the positions of the vertices @xmath43 and @xmath198 . let @xmath602 and @xmath603 be the other vertices in their respective ordered pairs ( according to @xmath178 ) . then , the only changes in the set of ordered pairs produced by step 1 is that the ordered pairs @xmath604 and @xmath605 change to @xmath606 and @xmath607 . all other ordered pairs remain the same , so their inclusion or exclusion in @xmath406 remains invariant . therefore , the value of @xmath406 can only change by at most 2 . fact [ fact : conc - perm ] then implies that the probability that @xmath406 deviates from its mean by more than @xmath608 is at most @xmath609 completing the proof . @xmath174 . now we show that the result of procedure 3 is a pseudo - random digraph . [ lem : d ] suppose @xmath1 , @xmath6 , and @xmath124 satisfy @xmath610 . let @xmath0 be an @xmath82-uniform 3-graph on @xmath1 vertices ( @xmath1 even ) , and randomly construct the @xmath85-vertex directed graph @xmath86 according to procedure 3 . then , with probability @xmath241 , @xmath86 is @xmath611-uniform . * proof . * we verify the properties of @xmath86 one at a time , starting with out - degrees . fix any two distinct vertices @xmath612 , and let @xmath291 be the number of ordered pairs @xmath269 produced by step 1 such that @xmath613 . it suffices to show that with probability @xmath313 , @xmath614 . ( note the factor of 2 because @xmath86 has @xmath7 vertices . ) for this , first let @xmath307 be the set of ordered pairs @xmath269 , not necessarily produced by step 1 , such that @xmath615 . this is a deterministic set , from the hypergraph @xmath0 , whose size we can estimate by applying @xmath271-uniformity to @xmath0 with various auxiliary graphs @xmath32 . indeed , by applying the property with @xmath353 ( in figure [ fig : gamma ] ) and @xmath306 , the number of choices for @xmath43 such that @xmath616 is @xmath272 . then , given such a choice for @xmath43 , applying uniformity with @xmath353 and @xmath617 shows that there are @xmath272 choices for @xmath198 such that @xmath618 is also an edge . putting these estimates together , we conclude that @xmath619 . since @xmath620 , lemma [ lem : pairs - kept ] gives @xmath621 with the desired probability . [ cols="^,^,^,^,^ " , ] the arguments for the other properties are very similar . for in - degrees , we fix a pair of distinct vertices @xmath306 , and apply uniformity with @xmath353 to show there are @xmath272 choices for @xmath198 such that @xmath622 . applying again on @xmath623 , we find a further @xmath272 choices for @xmath43 such that @xmath624 . this is exactly the same estimate as we had in the out - degree case above , so the same argument completes it . to control the common out - degrees of pairs of vertices in @xmath86 , we fix 4 distinct vertices of @xmath0 , arranged in two pairs @xmath306 and @xmath625 . applying uniformity with @xmath626 ( see figure [ fig : gamma ] ) , there are @xmath627 choices for @xmath43 such that @xmath628 . after fixing such a choice for @xmath43 , another application of uniformity with @xmath629 ( see figure [ fig : gamma ] ) shows that there are @xmath630 choices for @xmath198 such that @xmath631 . therefore , there are @xmath632 pairs @xmath269 which could serve as the terminal vertex of both directed edges from @xmath306 and @xmath625 , if only @xmath269 appeared as a pair in step 1 . since @xmath633 , we may apply lemma [ lem : pairs - kept ] , and finish as before . a similar argument controls @xmath72 in @xmath86 . to establish the last part of property ( ii ) of @xmath611-regularity for @xmath86 , fix any 4 distinct vertices in @xmath0 arranged in two pairs @xmath306 and @xmath634 . applying uniformity with @xmath353 ( see figure [ fig : gamma ] ) , there are @xmath272 choices for @xmath43 such that @xmath635 . fix such an @xmath43 . applying uniformity again with @xmath636 ( see figure [ fig : gamma ] ) , with @xmath637 corresponding to the labels in figure [ fig : gamma ] , we see that there are @xmath638 choices for @xmath198 such that all of @xmath639 . hence there are @xmath640 choices for a pair @xmath269 which would be both an in - neighbor of @xmath641 and an out - neighbor of @xmath642 , if only @xmath269 appeared as a pair in step 1 . thus lemma [ lem : pairs - kept ] finishes this case as before . for property ( iii ) of @xmath611-regularity for @xmath86 , fix any 8 distinct vertices in @xmath0 , arranged in 4 pairs @xmath306 , @xmath625 , @xmath643 , and @xmath644 . applying uniformity with @xmath626 shows that there are @xmath70 choices for @xmath43 such that both @xmath645 . then , after fixing such an @xmath43 , applying uniformity with @xmath646 ( see figure [ fig : gamma ] ) shows that there are @xmath647 choices for @xmath198 such that all @xmath648 . hence there are @xmath649 choices for a pair @xmath269 which would out - neighbors of both @xmath650 and in - neighbors of @xmath651 , if only @xmath269 appeared as a pair in step 1 . since @xmath652 , we may apply lemma [ lem : pairs - kept ] , and finish as before . @xmath174 next we prove the analogue of lemma [ lem : gamma - cover ] , establishing that repeated runs of procedure 3 will cover the edges of @xmath0 fairly uniformly . [ lem : d - cover ] suppose @xmath1 and @xmath124 satisfy @xmath315 . let @xmath0 be an @xmath82-uniform 3-graph on @xmath1 vertices ( @xmath1 even ) , and randomly and independently construct @xmath653 digraphs @xmath654 according to procedure 3 . let @xmath655 be their corresponding 3-graphs . then , with probability @xmath319 , every edge of @xmath0 is covered @xmath656 times by the @xmath655 . * proof . * fix an edge @xmath591 of @xmath0 , and let @xmath322 be the probability that it is covered by @xmath657 . there are several ways in which this can happen . first , it could be that @xmath306 is a pair from the permutation @xmath658 for @xmath657 , and @xmath592 is another pair , with @xmath659 also an edge of @xmath0 . let us bound the probability @xmath334 of this particular event happening . let @xmath41 be the number of choices for @xmath43 such that @xmath660 . in terms of @xmath41 , we have @xmath661 . to see this , first expose the position of @xmath66 ; it is in the first half of an ordered pair with probability @xmath337 . next , @xmath73 must be occupy the second position in that ordered pair , and then @xmath288 must select a first half spot in one of the remaining ordered pairs . finally , there are @xmath41 valid choices for @xmath288 s partner . but by @xmath82-uniformity applied with @xmath353 ( figure [ fig : gamma ] ) , @xmath662 . so ( using @xmath341 ) , @xmath663 . the above argument can be run with any permutation of @xmath664 . also , it could be that @xmath288 occupied the second position in its ordered pair , e.g. , if @xmath665 and @xmath666 were the pairs involved . therefore , @xmath667 . since the @xmath11 random constructions are independent , the number of times @xmath591 is covered is @xmath323}$ ] , which has expectation @xmath668 . the chernoff bound implies that the probability that the binomial deviates from its mean by more than a factor of @xmath345 is at most @xmath669 taking a union bound over all @xmath670 edges @xmath591 , we obtain the desired result . @xmath174 next , we prove a result which will serve the same purpose as lemma [ lem : gamma - rare - consec ] of the previous section . procedure 3 constructs a digraph @xmath86 on half as many vertices by pairing up the vertices of @xmath0 . let us say that a set @xmath595 of 4 vertices of @xmath0 is _ condensed _ in @xmath86 if two of those pairs above contain all 4 vertices in @xmath595 . for example , if @xmath671 , and two vertices of @xmath86 are the ordered pairs @xmath672 and @xmath673 , then @xmath595 is condensed in @xmath86 . [ lem : d - rare - close ] suppose @xmath674 . construct @xmath11 independent @xmath675 according to procedure 3 . then with probability @xmath319 , every set @xmath595 of 4 vertices in @xmath0 is condensed in at most 9 of the @xmath675 . * proof . * for a fixed set of 4 vertices @xmath676 , the probability that it is condensed in @xmath677 is precisely @xmath678 . to see this , first expose the position of @xmath66 in the permutation @xmath658 which defines @xmath677 this identifies the position which contains the other vertex in @xmath66 s pair ; expose the vertex in that spot . the probability that it is @xmath73 , @xmath288 , or @xmath289 is precisely @xmath679 . assuming this is the case , there are still two vertices of interest left , say @xmath288 and @xmath289 . then expose the position of @xmath288 . this identifies the position which contains the other vertex in @xmath288 s pair ; expose the vertex in that spot . the probability that it is @xmath289 is precisely @xmath680 . since the @xmath675 are independent , the number of them which have the above property with respect to @xmath681 is stochastically dominated by @xmath682}$ ] . since we assumed @xmath683 , the probability that this exceeds 9 is at most @xmath684 so a union bound over all @xmath685 choices for @xmath681 completes the proof . we now formulate the analogue of procedure 2 for the hypergraph setting . * procedure 4 . * this takes as input a 3-graph @xmath0 with an even number of vertices , and an integer parameter @xmath11 . 1 . independently generate the random digraphs @xmath654 according to procedure 3 , and let @xmath655 be their corresponding 3-graphs . 2 . for each edge @xmath686 let @xmath687 . if @xmath688 , independently select a uniformly random index in @xmath689 to label @xmath414 with . 3 . for each @xmath675 , define the subgraph @xmath690 by keeping each edge @xmath321 if and only if both of its corresponding 3-graph edges are labeled by @xmath251 . 4 . for each @xmath251 , let @xmath691 be the 3-graph containing all hyperedges which correspond to the directed edges left in @xmath690 . note that @xmath692 . as in procedure 2 , the final step ensures that the @xmath691 are all disjoint , so lemma [ lem : hamilton - di - hyp ] shows that we can work on each @xmath690 independently , packing hamilton cycles with theorem [ thm : digraph ] . then , we will remove all @xmath691 from @xmath0 , and repeat . the next result establishes the necessary pseudo - random properties of the @xmath690 . [ lem : d - prime ] suppose @xmath1 , @xmath6 , and @xmath124 satisfy @xmath693 . let @xmath0 be an @xmath82-uniform 3-graph on @xmath1 vertices ( @xmath1 even ) , and conduct procedure 4 with @xmath694 . let @xmath695 . then , with probability @xmath319 , every @xmath690 is @xmath696-uniform . * proof . * our restrictions on @xmath64 allow us to apply lemma [ lem : d ] ( @xmath697 ) and lemma [ lem : d - cover ] @xmath698 , so we have that with probability @xmath319 , after step 1 of procedure 4 : ( a ) : : every @xmath675 is @xmath611-uniform . ( b ) : : every edge in @xmath0 is covered @xmath379 times by the @xmath655 . condition on the above outcome of step 1 , and consider an arbitrary @xmath690 . it suffices to show that in the randomness of step 2 , with probability @xmath313 each individual @xmath690 has the desired properties , since @xmath699 by the given restrictions on @xmath700 . we start by verifying out - degrees . a vertex @xmath701 corresponds to a pair of vertices @xmath306 from @xmath0 . for each edge of @xmath675 which is directed away from @xmath155 , there is a distinct pair of vertices @xmath269 from @xmath0 . that directed edge remains in @xmath690 if and only if both of its associated hyperedges @xmath702 receive label @xmath251 . this happens with probability @xmath703^{-2}$ ] by property ( b ) above . yet property ( a ) ensures that the number @xmath41 of such directed edges in @xmath675 is @xmath704 , so the expected out - degree of @xmath155 in @xmath690 is @xmath705 . for concentration , note that all of the @xmath706 hyperedges associated with the @xmath41 directed edges are distinct , so their labels are generated independently . therefore , by the chernoff inequality , the probability that the out - degree of @xmath155 in @xmath690 deviates from its expectation by more than a factor of @xmath389 is at most @xmath707 because @xmath708 . therefore , with probability @xmath496 , the degree of @xmath155 in @xmath690 is @xmath709 . taking a union bound over all @xmath710 establishes uniformity for out - degrees . all other properties of @xmath711-uniformity follow by a similar argument . importantly , in each case , all directed edges correspond to disjoint pairs of hyperedges , so we can always use the chernoff inequality to establish concentration . the smallest mean we ever deal with is @xmath712 , from property ( iii ) of uniformity for @xmath690 , so the largest error in concentration is at most @xmath713 where we use @xmath714 . @xmath174 we now move to show how the hypergraph @xmath0 is affected by the deletion of all hypergraphs @xmath691 . as before , we use inclusion / exclusion to sandwich the quantities in question , using an accurate `` first - order '' estimate , together with a rough `` second - order '' upper bound . [ lem : h - delete-1 ] condition on the first step of procedure 4 covering every edge of @xmath0 @xmath379 times by the @xmath655 . fix any two distinct vertices @xmath715 , and a set @xmath595 of vertices such that @xmath635 for all @xmath716 . suppose that @xmath717 . then with probability @xmath718 , the number @xmath406 of vertices @xmath716 such that @xmath719 is covered by the @xmath691 is @xmath720 , * proof . * let @xmath721 . since we are conditioning on the result of step 1 , the only randomness left is in the independent exposure of all hyperedge labels , most of which are irrelevant for @xmath406 . we define @xmath411 , the set of relevant edges , as follows . for each @xmath722 which covers some @xmath723 , there is a partner edge @xmath724 such that @xmath414 remains in @xmath725 if and only if @xmath414 and @xmath418 receive the label @xmath422 . let @xmath411 be the collection of all partner edges obtained in this way , together with all @xmath726 . since we assume every @xmath727 is covered at most @xmath728 times by the @xmath722 , we always have @xmath729 . observe that all labels outside @xmath411 have no effect on @xmath406 at all , so we may condition on an arbitrary setting of those labels , leaving only @xmath730 independent labels to be exposed . next , we show that the probability that a particular edge @xmath731 is covered by the @xmath725 is @xmath732^{-1}$ ] . to see this , note that after revealing the label @xmath422 of @xmath414 , there is a single partner edge @xmath724 , whose label must match that of @xmath414 . since @xmath418 is covered @xmath379 times by the @xmath655 , it has probability @xmath732^{-1}$ ] of receiving that label @xmath422 . therefore by linearity of expectation , @xmath415 } = ( 1 \pm 1.04\epsilon ) \frac{|s|}{\kappa}$ ] . we use the hoeffding - azuma inequality to establish the concentration of @xmath406 , as the remaining randomness is a product space of dimension @xmath733 . consider the effect of changing the label of a hyperedge @xmath734 from @xmath251 to @xmath422 . note that its old partner edge @xmath735 overlapped with @xmath414 in two vertices , but also included a new vertex , say @xmath736 . changing the label of @xmath414 away from @xmath251 could potentially remove any or all of @xmath737 from the count for @xmath406 ( if @xmath735 had received label @xmath251 ) , so this could potentially reduce @xmath406 by up to 4 . similarly , setting the label of @xmath414 to @xmath422 can potentially increase @xmath406 by up to 4 . therefore , @xmath406 is 4-lipschitz , so the hoeffding - azuma inequality implies that the probability that @xmath406 deviates from its expectation by more than @xmath738 is at most @xmath739 where we used @xmath740 . therefore , with probability @xmath718 , we have @xmath741 , as desired . @xmath174 having proved an accurate `` first - order '' estimate , we move to the `` second - order '' upper bound ( analogous to lemma [ lem : d - delete - co - out ] ) . in the 3-graph setting , this breaks into two cases , which we treat in the following two lemmas . [ lem : h - delete-2-disjoint ] condition on the first step of procedure 4 covering every edge of @xmath0 @xmath742 times by the @xmath655 . fix any distinct vertices @xmath743 and any set of vertices @xmath595 such that both @xmath628 for all @xmath716 . suppose that @xmath744 . then with probability @xmath745 , the number @xmath406 of vertices @xmath716 which still have both @xmath719 and @xmath746 covered by the @xmath691 is at most @xmath747 . * proof . * again , the only remaining randomness is in the labeling of the hyperedges in step 2 . also , since each edge is covered by at most @xmath748 of the @xmath722 , less than @xmath749 of them are relevant for @xmath406 , for the same reason as in the previous proof . so , we may condition on all labels for irrelevant edges , and focus on the remaining product space over the relevant edges @xmath411 . let us bound the probability that a particular @xmath716 remains in the count for @xmath406 . first , expose the labels for @xmath750 and @xmath751 , and suppose they are @xmath19 and @xmath454 . let their partner edges be @xmath752 and @xmath753 . importantly , @xmath754 can not equal @xmath418 , because @xmath754 must overlap with @xmath414 in two vertices . hence the label of @xmath754 has not yet been exposed . similarly , the label of @xmath755 has not yet been exposed . however , note that it may happen that @xmath756 . in order for @xmath43 to remain in the count for @xmath406 , @xmath754 must receive label @xmath19 and @xmath755 must receive label @xmath454 . first we show that if @xmath757 , then the probability of this occurring is 0 . indeed , if @xmath758 , it clearly can not happen . but otherwise , if @xmath759 , it is impossible for @xmath756 in the first place , because in @xmath760 , each edge has a distinct partner edge , so @xmath754 and @xmath755 should be distinct . on the other hand , if @xmath761 , the probability that these independent labels equal @xmath19 and @xmath454 is at most @xmath762^{-2}$ ] , because each edge is covered by at least @xmath763 of the @xmath722 . therefore , we conclude that in all cases , the probability of a certain @xmath764 remaining in the count for @xmath406 is at most @xmath765 , so @xmath415 } \leq \frac{2}{\kappa^2 } |s|$ ] . finally , the same argument that we used in the proof of lemma [ lem : h - delete-1 ] shows that @xmath406 is 4-lipschitz over the product space of dimension @xmath766 . hence the probability that @xmath406 exceeds its expectation by more than @xmath767 is at most @xmath768 since we assumed @xmath744 . therefore , with probability @xmath718 , we have @xmath769 , as desired . @xmath174 [ lem : h - delete-2-incident ] condition on the first step of procedure 4 covering every edge of @xmath0 @xmath742 times by the @xmath655 , and on the property that every set of 4 vertices of @xmath0 is condensed in at most 9 of the @xmath675 . fix any distinct vertices @xmath770 and any set of vertices @xmath595 such that both @xmath771 for all @xmath716 . suppose that @xmath744 . then with probability @xmath718 , the number @xmath406 of vertices @xmath772 which still have both @xmath719 and @xmath659 covered by the @xmath691 is at most @xmath773 . * proof . * again , the only remaining randomness is in the labeling of the hyperedges in step 2 , so we may concentrate on the product space of dimension @xmath774 , where @xmath411 is the set of all edges @xmath775 and their possible partners . to bound the probability that a particular @xmath716 remains in the count for @xmath406 , expose the labels for @xmath750 and @xmath776 , and suppose they are @xmath19 and @xmath454 . let their partner edges be @xmath752 and @xmath753 . this time , it is possible for @xmath777 or @xmath778 , but that can only happen if the 4 vertices @xmath779 are condensed in @xmath780 . furthermore , if @xmath781 , then @xmath43 is automatically excluded from the count for @xmath406 , which is not a problem because we only seek an upper bound . therefore , the probability that @xmath43 contributes to @xmath406 is at most @xmath782 , where @xmath334 is the probability that @xmath414 and @xmath418 both receive the same label @xmath19 , with @xmath783 condensed in @xmath780 , and @xmath335 is the conditional probability that @xmath754 and @xmath755 receive labels @xmath19 and @xmath454 , given the exposure of the labels of @xmath414 and @xmath418 , and @xmath784 , @xmath785 . we assumed that @xmath783 were only condensed in at most 9 of the @xmath786 , so @xmath787 . as for @xmath335 , the same argument that we used in the previous lemma shows that if @xmath756 , then we must have had @xmath781 , so it is impossible for @xmath754 to receive @xmath19 and @xmath755 to receive @xmath454 , hence @xmath43 can not contribute to @xmath406 . the only remaining case is @xmath761 , and the probability that both receive the correct label is at most @xmath788^{-2}$ ] . putting everything together , we conclude that the probability that @xmath43 contributes to @xmath406 is at most @xmath789 , so @xmath415 } \leq \frac{12}{\kappa^2 } |s|$ ] . finally , the same argument that we used in the previous proof again establishes the lipschitz constant of 4 for @xmath406 in the product space of dimension @xmath766 . hence the probability that @xmath406 exceeds its expectation by more than @xmath767 is at most @xmath768 since we assumed @xmath744 . therefore , with probability @xmath718 , we have @xmath790 , as desired . @xmath174 now we combine our first - order and second - order bounds , and show that the pseudo - random properties of @xmath0 are maintained after deleting all @xmath691 . [ lem : h - delete ] suppose @xmath1 , @xmath6 , and @xmath124 satisfy @xmath791 . let @xmath792 and @xmath695 . let @xmath0 be an @xmath82-uniform 3-graph on @xmath1 vertices ( @xmath1 even ) , and conduct procedure 4 . let @xmath793 be the subgraph of @xmath0 obtained by deleting all edges covered by any @xmath691 . then , with probability @xmath794 , @xmath793 is an @xmath487-uniform 3-graph with @xmath795 and @xmath489 . * by applying lemmas [ lem : d - cover ] and [ lem : d - rare - close ] , the outcome of step 1 of procedure 4 will satisfy the following two properties with probability @xmath319 . ( the second follows since @xmath796 , and so @xmath683 . ) * every edge of @xmath0 is covered @xmath379 times by the @xmath655 . * every set of 4 vertices of @xmath0 is condensed in at most 9 of the @xmath675 . condition on this outcome . we will now show that in the remaining randomness of step 2 , the properties of @xmath487-uniformity are satisfied with probability @xmath319 . for this , fix a set of @xmath49 vertices @xmath797 , and let @xmath32 be an arbitrary @xmath41-vertex graph with @xmath50 edges . it suffices to show that in @xmath793 , the random variable @xmath798 is @xmath799 with probability @xmath718 , because we can then take a union bound over all @xmath800 choices for the @xmath205 , and all @xmath801 possibilities for @xmath32 . let @xmath595 be the set of all @xmath43 such that @xmath36 for every edge @xmath37 . our assumed @xmath82-uniformity gives @xmath802 . we will use a similar inclusion / exclusion argument as in the proof of lemma [ lem : digraph - delete ] to estimate @xmath120 in terms of @xmath803 . let @xmath804 be the edges of @xmath32 . for each @xmath805 , define the random variable @xmath806 as follows . let @xmath293 be the endpoints of edge @xmath807 . then let @xmath806 be the number of vertices @xmath808 such that @xmath809 is covered by some @xmath810 . also , for every two distinct @xmath811 , let the random variable @xmath812 count the number of vertices @xmath716 such that both @xmath813 and @xmath814 are covered by some @xmath810 , where @xmath815 and @xmath816 are the respective endpoints of @xmath817 and @xmath818 . in terms of these random variables , the principle of inclusion / exclusion always gives @xmath819 since we noted above that @xmath820 , we have @xmath821 , so lemma [ lem : h - delete-1 ] controls all @xmath822 with probability @xmath718 . also , since @xmath823 , lemmas [ lem : h - delete-2-disjoint ] and [ lem : h - delete-2-incident ] show that every @xmath824 with probability @xmath718 . putting everything together , and using @xmath50 and @xmath825 , we have @xmath826 now observe that @xmath827 again using @xmath825 , we bound the error term by @xmath524 . therefore , we have @xmath828 = ( 1 \pm \epsilon ' ) n ( p')^s,\ ] ] as desired . @xmath174 we finally finish the proof of theorem [ thm:3graph ] . the method is essentially the same as that used to prove theorem [ thm : digraph ] in the previous section . * proof of theorem [ thm:3graph ] . * let @xmath829 , @xmath528 , and @xmath529 . define the sequences @xmath530 , @xmath531 via the following recursion : @xmath830 let @xmath533 be the smallest index such that @xmath831 . note that @xmath535 only increases , so @xmath832 also note that since @xmath833 we have in general that @xmath834 . therefore , @xmath835 we now iteratively construct @xmath836 , such that each @xmath837 is @xmath542-uniform . indeed , consider the ( random ) procedure 4 applied to @xmath837 with respect to @xmath838 . let @xmath839 . this produces digraphs @xmath840 and 3-graphs @xmath841 with all @xmath841 disjoint . let @xmath842 be the result of deleting all @xmath841 from @xmath837 . to apply lemmas [ lem : d - prime ] and [ lem : h - delete ] , we must check that @xmath843 . but this follows from our initial assumption that @xmath844 since @xmath550 and @xmath845 . therefore , the two lemmas show that with probability @xmath490 , procedure 4 results in the following properties : ( i ) : : every @xmath840 is @xmath846-uniform . ( ii ) : : @xmath842 is @xmath556-uniform . we may assume this outcome , since we will only iterate @xmath553 times . in order to apply theorem [ thm : digraph ] to each @xmath840 , we must verify that @xmath847 . indeed , this is the case : @xmath848 by our initial assumption that @xmath849 . so , every @xmath840 can be packed with hamilton cycles , missing only an @xmath850-fraction of the edges . by lemma [ lem : hamilton - di - hyp ] , these edge - disjoint hamilton cycles in @xmath840 correspond to edge - disjoint hamilton cycles in @xmath841 , missing the same fraction of edges since there is a 2-to-1 correspondence between edges in @xmath841 and @xmath840 . we carry on the above procedure until we create @xmath851 . then , we will have packed hamilton cycles in @xmath852 , up to error of @xmath853-fraction . it remains to estimate the numbers of edges in @xmath851 and @xmath0 . note that in general , by applying @xmath82-uniformity to every pair of vertices ( using @xmath353 in figure [ fig : gamma ] ) , we can estimate the number of edges in any @xmath82-uniform 3-graph to be @xmath854 , because this counts every hyperedge @xmath855 times . thus @xmath0 has at least @xmath856 edges , and @xmath851 has at most @xmath857 edges . thus @xmath851 itself has at most @xmath858-fraction of the total number of edges . therefore , the fraction of edges of @xmath0 that have not been covered is at most @xmath859 since @xmath860 by inequality . this completes the proof . @xmath174 * the above proof showed that we can pack the edges of @xmath0 with hamilton cycles , up to a fractional error of at most @xmath571 , where @xmath861 . in fact , one can prove the same result for any @xmath862 , and all of the calculations can be recovered by following our proof . just as in section [ sec : digraph ] , we intentionally introduced a very high level of precision in lemma [ lem : d - cover ] . it is clear that the same argument can replace the @xmath574 with @xmath575 , etc . these smaller order errors are what accumulate into the decimal places in the final @xmath863 which appears in lemma [ lem : h - delete ] , and which later determines the value of @xmath288 . when @xmath863 is replaced by a constant arbitrarily close to 6 , the above argument produces a result with @xmath288 approaching @xmath864 . our proof of theorem [ thm:3graph ] is only valid when @xmath1 is divisible by four , because we required a factor of 2 in each reduction step ( from hypergraphs to digraphs , and then to bipartite graphs ) . although we do not expect this condition to be necessary , removing this restriction is open . we also leave open the question of packing hamilton cycles of type @xmath20 in @xmath19-uniform hypergraphs when @xmath865 and @xmath866 . finally , another interesting direction is to streamline the sets of pseudo - random properties which appear in the statements of our packing results ( both for digraphs and for 3-graphs ) . Abstract:

Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.

Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered . Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video . Paper: it is generally assumed that diffusion in macroscopic systems is a result of chaos on a microscopic scale , following einstein s 1905 explanation for brownian motion , that is , the movement of a colloidal particle due to thermal fluctuations in the surrounding fluid . we describe chaos , diffusion and related properties in detail in sec . [ s : fund ] . we define microscopic chaos ( usually shortened to just `` chaos '' ) in terms of unpredictability as quantified by positive lyapunov exponents or a positive kolmogorov - sinai entropy ; later we will find that properties based on periodic orbits also provide a useful description of chaotic aspects of the microscopic dynamics . note that we restrict the use of the term `` chaotic '' to its usual meaning , that is a positive kolmogorov - sinai entropy ; while the properties of periodic orbits are important , we do not classify systems as chaotic or nonchaotic based on these properties . we call a system diffusive when the mean square displacement of a particle is proportional to the time , or a distribution of particles satisfies the diffusion equation . a recent experiment of gaspard et al @xcite , described below , purports to show that the diffusion of a brownian particle is due to microscopic chaos . while we believe that brownian motion ( including both the brownian particle and the solvent ) is most likely chaotic , our simulations using nonchaotic models , in a brief comment @xcite and in greater detail here lead to the same results as found in the experiment , so that no experimental proof of microscopic chaos has been given in @xcite . here we explore the question of what kind of experimental measurements or data analysis might be required to identify microscopic chaotic dynamics , and the connection between microscopic chaos and diffusion . we consider generalizations of models of diffusion due to lorentz and ehrenfest ( figs . [ f : fix]-[f : lor ] ) , where a single point particle undergoes elastic collisions with a fixed arrangement of circular or square scatterers in two dimensions , respectively . collisions with the circular scatterers of the ( chaotic ) lorentz gas lead to exponential separation of nearby trajectories , that is , a positive lyapunov exponent , while collisions with the square scatterers of the ( nonchaotic ) ehrenfest model lead to at most linear separation of nearby trajectories , and the lyapunov exponents are all zero . actually , we consider models with three types of scatterers , all of which are non - overlapping : circles as in the lorentz gas , squares oriented such that their diagonals are parallel to the coordinate axes and with only four particle velocity directions as in the ehrenfest wind - tree model , and squares of arbitrary orientations with arbitrary particle velocity directions as a generalization of the ehrenfest model . ( 280,280)(-50,0 ) ( 40,10 ) ( 280,280)(-50,0 ) ( 40,10 ) ( 280,280)(-50,0 ) ( 40,10 ) for each of these three models , we consider the following three cases : an infinite number of randomly placed fixed scatterers as in the original models of lorentz and ehrenfest , a small number of fixed scatterers in an elementary cell subject to periodic boundary conditions , and an arrangement of a finite number of fixed scatterers enclosed by absorbing boundaries . note that a model with periodic boundary conditions can be viewed as an infinite periodic system . for the purposes of studying properties such as the mean free time , it is better to view the model as a finite system with periodic boundaries , but to compute the diffusion coefficient in terms of the growth of the mean square displacement with time , it is necessary to view the model as an infinite periodic system . a link between chaos and diffusion involves a fundamental question of statistical mechanics , since one has to make a connection between the microscopic and macroscopic behavior of large systems . the models we consider here are very special from a physical point of view , but very attractive from a mathematical point of view , because there is only one moving particle , rather than a large number as in , for example , brownian motion . these can be considered bona fide statistical mechanical models if the large number of scatterers are included , as long as their lack of motion is irrelevant to the questions we ask . we believe that our models incorporate the essential features needed for a discussion of microscopic chaos and diffusion . we now describe the experiment and analysis of gaspard et al . in more detail . the position of a brownian particle in a fluid was measured at regular intervals of @xmath0 . the experimental time series data was then interpreted using standard techniques of chaotic time series analysis , suggesting a positive lower bound on the kolmogorov - sinai entropy , hence microscopic chaos . the method they used , due to cohen and procaccia @xcite was adapted from an approach pioneered by grassberger and procaccia @xcite . in this method one analyzes the distribution of recurrences , _ i.e. _ instances where the system approximately retraces part of its previous trajectory in phase space for a certain length of time , leading to a determination of the kolmogorov - sinai entropy . there is detailed mathematical justification for the method ( under assumptions such as the length of the data set being sufficient to approximate infinite time limits , see sec . [ s : gp ] ) , but the idea is very simple : recurrences give useful information about the predictability of the system . if long recurrences occur very often , it is easy to predict the future of the system from previous instances similar to the recent part of the trajectory , so the system has a small or zero kolmogorov - sinai entropy , whereas a rapid decay of the frequency with length of the recurrences indicates a high degree of microscopic chaos . thus , the cohen - procaccia method used by gaspard can be used to calculate the kolmogorov - sinai entropy from a time series in principle , but certain mathematical conditions and limits apply , sometimes restricting its applicability in practice . gaspard et al . concluded from their analysis that the kolmogorov - sinai entropy of the system containing the brownian particle was positive , and hence that the microscopic dynamics was chaotic . subsequently , we showed @xcite that the same approach applied to an `` identical '' time series generated by a numerical simulation of the nonchaotic ( infinite , fixed orientation ) ehrenfest model yielded virtually identical results . this is surprising , since the collisions with the flat sides of square scatterers do not lead to positive lyapunov exponents , as described above . in ref . @xcite we attributed the discrepancy to the physical issue of time scales the time interval between measurements ( @xmath0 ) was vastly greater than the typical collision times of the brownian particle with the solvent particles in the fluid ( approximately @xmath1 ) . while this is certainly an experimental problem , it leaves open the question of whether in principle a similar analysis with a much higher resolution could ever prove from experimental data that the microscopic dynamics is chaotic or not . one aim of the current work is to shed light on this , and related questions . we perform the same cohen - procaccia analysis on all the models mentioned above , finding that the same results are obtained even for a model with a periodic array of squares . this rules out the possibility that the apparently positive value of the kolmogorov - sinai entropy is due to a loss of information associated with the randomness of the many scatterers . we discuss the relevant time scales in our models , finding a single microscopic time scale , and we can then qualitatively explain the results of the cohen - procaccia algorithm when the time step is shorter or longer than this time . we conclude that due to the rarity of recurrences in a diffusive system , the determination of chaoticity in such a system requires vastly longer time series than are practical for experimental or computational work , even when the measurements are taken at microscopic time and distance scales . at that point we return to the question of how microscopic dynamics manifests itself in a time series , as well as in the macroscopic behavior . we develop a new method which we call `` almost periodic recurrences '' that selects a particular class of recurrences different from those used in the cohen - procaccia method . our approach is designed to distinguish systems based on their periodic orbit properties , which are related to , but not equivalent to the usual definition of chaos as positive kolmogorov - sinai entropy . we find that , in contrast to the cohen - procaccia method , this method can distinguish between the chaotic lorentz model and the nonchaotic ehrenfest model and thus reveals at least one way in which microscopic chaos is manifest , although on macroscopic scales both models exhibit diffusion . the basic idea of our method is simple : almost periodic recurrences are related to periodic orbits which have very different properties in chaotic and nonchaotic systems , so a search for periodic orbits using recurrences may distinguish between the two classes of systems . the periodic orbits of chaotic systems ( such as the lorentz gas ) are exponentially unstable , so many repetitions close to a periodic orbit are unlikely . in contrast , the periodic orbits of nonchaotic systems ( for example our wind - tree models ) can be power law unstable , allowing many repetitions . the markedly different properties of periodic orbits in the lorentz and ehrenfest models leads to the following important observations about diffusion in finite geometries . solutions of the diffusion equation with absorbing boundaries exhibit exponential decay , corresponding to the probability of a particle remaining in the system for a given time . the randomly oriented wind - tree model has periodic orbits with power law escape , so that the escape from the whole system can not be exponential at long times . the fixed orientation wind - tree model has no periodic orbits at all , so the particle can not remain in the system longer than a fixed maximum time . both of these are examples of situations in which the infinite model satisfies the diffusion equation by having a gaussian distribution with the mean square displacement proportional to the time , but the corresponding finite model does not satisfy the diffusion equation . the outline of this paper is as follows : first we introduce our models ( sec . [ s : mod ] ) , and discuss in detail their relevant time scales and chaotic and diffusive properties ( sec . [ s : fund ] ) . then we discuss the cohen - procaccia method and its inability to distinguish chaotic from nonchaotic dynamics in our case ( sec . [ s : gp ] ) . finally we introduce our alternative `` almost periodic recurrence '' method and discuss the properties of the periodic orbits ( sec . [ s : isr ] ) , and their consequences for finite systems ( sec . [ s : esc ] ) . we conclude with a discussion of our results and some open questions ( sec.[s : conc ] ) . the ehrenfest wind - tree model describes a point `` wind '' particle moving in straight lines in the plane punctuated by elastic collisions with fixed square scatterers , the `` trees '' . in the original model ( fig . [ f : fix ] ) , the trees are oriented with their diagonals along the @xmath2 and @xmath3 axes , and the wind particle moves with a fixed velocity in only four possible directions , along these axes . the trees are located at random positions , with a given number density , and not overlapping . there is an overlapping version we will not consider ; it exhibits anomalous ( sub)-diffusion and non - gaussian distributions @xcite . secondly , we consider the case of randomly oriented scatterers ( fig . [ f : ran ] ) , which allows all possible wind particle directions . in both the fixed and randomly oriented cases all lyapunov exponents are zero , because a collision from a flat scatterer causes only a linear separation of nearby trajectories ; it does not cause the exponential separation associated with convex curved scatterers . thirdly , we consider the ( two dimensional ) lorentz gas ( fig . [ f : lor ] ) , that is , a model where the scatterers are circular , and we choose the area and number density of the scatterers to correspond to the wind - tree models . this model is known to have normal diffusive properties @xcite and is used here as a comparison to examine the effects of positive versus zero lyapunov exponents . for the numerical simulations , we take the velocity of the wind particle to be @xmath4 . for the wind - tree models we take the side length @xmath5 equal to @xmath6 . this is done for computational convenience ; space is divided into unit squares ( of side length 1 ) aligned with the coordinate axes , so that at most one scatterer can be contained in each unit square . for the lorentz gas the circular scatterers have a radius @xmath7 to give them the same area @xmath8 as the squares . in all cases the total area considered has a number of unit squares , @xmath9 , up to @xmath10 in both @xmath2 and @xmath3 directions , and periodic boundary conditions are used . to simulate an infinite system , a large value of @xmath9 ( up to 3500 ) is used ; for the maximum time of @xmath11 time units the particle never travels far enough to sample the periodic boundary conditions . to simulate a periodic system , a small size such as @xmath12 is used ; we always consider the case of finite horizon , so that the time between collisions is bounded . to simulate a system with absorbing boundaries , an intermediate size such as @xmath13 is used ; the absorbing boundaries are one distance unit inside the edge of the system to avoid the possibility of the particle colliding with a scatterer as well as with its periodic image . we use a number of scatterers @xmath14 equal to @xmath15 . this means that the number density @xmath16 is @xmath17 in all cases and the proportion of the total area covered by the scatterers is @xmath18 . thus we have an intermediate density of scatterers , which is most convenient from the point of view of the simulations and also the time scales . for a significantly lower density , an infinite horizon is much more likely in all but the largest systems . for a significantly higher density ( limited by a maximum of @xmath19 ) the metropolis algorithm ( see below ) used to position the scatterers is very much slower . also , both for low and high density systems , there is an additional time scale ( see section [ s : time ] ) , which complicates the analysis . we now describe the method used to position the fixed scatterers . each configuration of random positions and orientations is obtained from a version of the metropolis algorithm , used in @xcite . the square scatterers of the wind - tree models are placed initially at points belonging to a square lattice defined such that they do not overlap , that is , with their centers at integer coordinates @xmath20 such that @xmath21 is even , and their orientation as in fig . [ f : fix ] . not every lattice site is then occupied , depending on the number density . each scatterer is shifted and rotated a small random amount in turn , typically a few tenths of a distance unit and of order ten degrees respectively . if the shift causes an overlap , the move is rejected and the previous configuration is used . the procedure is repeated with different shifts and rotations . a large fixed number of shifts are attempted , sufficient for reasonable measures of the correlation between scatterers to have long converged to their final values . if the circles of the lorentz gas are placed on the same lattice as the squares they overlap slightly ; at the chosen density of @xmath22 there is enough freedom to allow them to find non - overlapping locations , so that the final configuration is non - overlapping , as we could check . at higher densities circles may not find non - overlapping locations , and a close packed triangular lattice should then be used instead . we now define the notation we will use to distinguish between the various models . there are a very large number of possible parameters that could appear in general , referring to the shape of the scatterers ( squares , circles , etc . ) , different densities and different shaped boundary conditions to name a few , but for conciseness we limit the notation to include only those models we use here , in particular keeping the areal density always at @xmath22 . using square brackets [ , ] to denote different cases , our notation is [ f , r , l][@xmath23,[p , a]@xmath9 ] . the first symbol [ f , r , l ] denotes the type and orientation of the scatterers , f for fixed oriented squares , r for randomly oriented squares and l for circles ( the lorentz gas ) . the next symbol [ @xmath23,p , a ] gives information about the boundary conditions , either @xmath23 , that is , no boundaries , or p for periodic boundary conditions or a for absorbing boundaries . the symbols p and a are followed by the size of the system , @xmath9 , which is an even integer . thus the original ehrenfest model is denoted f@xmath23 , while a periodic lorentz gas with @xmath25 ( containing @xmath26 scatterers at the density used in our simulations ) is denoted lp8 ( see fig . [ f : lor ] ) . the latter model is generated by random shifts of the scatterers as above , ensuring that periodic images of the scatterers do not overlap . when no confusion can arise , we will sometimes refer to classes of models with a simplified notation , for example we denote all randomly oriented wind - tree models as r , and all lorentz models with absorbing boundaries as la . this section collects a number of fundamental properties and results that form a basis for sections [ s : gp ] , [ s : isr ] and [ s : esc ] . first we consider the important issue of _ time scales _ , which puts the time series analysis methods of sections [ s : gp ] and [ s : isr ] into a physical context . then we consider _ chaotic properties _ , giving known results and conjectures for our models ; all of the following sections use this . after this we study _ diffusive properties _ , obtaining some new results . these are of direct importance to sec . [ s : esc ] ; the time series analysis methods are applied only to our diffusive models , . ] but the diffusion is somewhat incidental as the methods can be applied to arbitrary time series . at the end of this section we relate the chaotic and diffusive properties of our models . one of our difficulties of the gaspard et al experiment @xcite is that the interval between their measurements ( 1/60 s ) is so much greater than the relevant time scale ( @xmath1 ) of the dynamics , that is the time interval determined by collisions between the brownian particle and the other particles in the fluid . it is thus important to clarify the issue of what time scales are relevant in our models , so that the simulation results can be put in context . there are three relevant time scales here , the time taken for the particle to traverse the length of a scatterer ( defined to be of order one time unit ; see sec . [ s : comp ] ) , the mean free time between collisions @xmath27 , and the time at which the particle begins to notice the finite size @xmath9 of the system ( when it is not infinite ) . it turns out ( see sec . [ s : diff ] ) that all the random and periodic models except fp have a well defined diffusion coefficient @xmath28 , so in these cases the time taken to reach the boundary is of order @xmath29 . the mean free time can be calculated exactly ( see the appendix ) and is given by @xmath30 , @xmath31 and @xmath32 for the f , r , and l models respectively , independent of the size of the system ( ignoring the case of absorbing boundaries ) . we have checked these values numerically , and the results agree within their uncertainties of about @xmath33 . it is clear that all the time scales in these models are of order one time unit , except those defined by the boundary . this means that a time step of one time unit should be sufficient to observe effects due to the microscopic chaos in the time series analysis methods of sections [ s : gp ] and [ s : isr ] . we began with the notion of microscopic chaos as the presence of a positive lyapunov exponent arising from collisions with strictly convex scatterers , or as a positive kolmogorov - sinai entropy quantifying the lack of predictability of a chaotic system . we now want to make these ideas more precise and clarify what is known and what is conjectured about our models . from a mathematical point of view , there are a large number of dynamical properties that a system may exhibit @xcite . those of interest to us are 1 . we need ergodicity for the time series analysis methods of secs . [ s : gp ] and [ s : isr ] ; that is , a single long trajectory is supposed to sample the dynamics of the whole phase space . we either know or conjecture that ergodicity holds in all of our models ( see below ) . 2 . decay of velocity correlations . we note that eqs . ( [ e : gk],[e : gkb ] ) below give the diffusion and burnett coefficients as integrals over velocity autocorrelation functions : the diffusion coefficient involves two - time correlations , while the burnett coefficient involves four - time correlations . for these coefficients to be defined the appropriate correlations must decay sufficiently quickly . numerical evidence for the existence or nonexistence of these coefficients for our models is given in sec . [ s : diff ] . 3 . a positive lyapunov exponent , corresponding to exponential separation of initially close trajectories , follows from the shape of the scatterers . the lorentz gas has a positive lyapunov exponent due to its convex scatterers , while the wind - tree models have all zero lyapunov exponents due to their ( piecewise ) flat scatterers . 4 . a positive kolmogorov - sinai entropy , which is our definition of chaos , and which the cohen - procaccia method ( see sec . [ s : gp ] ) is designed to compute . we either know or conjecture that the ks entropy is equal to the sum of the positive lyapunov exponents in our models ( pesin s theorem , see below ) . actually there is at most one positive lyapunov exponent in these systems . periodic orbit properties sensitive to chaoticity are described in sec . [ s : isr ] and used in secs . [ s : isr ] and [ s : esc ] . we now briefly discuss what is known about our models regarding these dynamical properties . the periodic lorentz gas has exponential decay of ( all two time ) correlations @xcite , which implies ergodicity and the convergence of the integral in ( [ e : gk ] ) below . for ( [ e : gkb ] ) see ref . the periodic wind - tree models are generically ergodic @xcite . pesin s theorem holds for all of these [ f , r , l]p models , see refs . @xcite for the lorentz gas and ref . @xcite for the wind - tree models . the infinite models are much more difficult to treat rigorously because the phase space is not compact . in order to make reasonable conjectures about the above properties , we use the solution of the diffusion equation ( [ e : gauss ] ) below , which is verified numerically in sec . [ s : diff ] for the models [ f , r , l]@xmath23 , to argue that the number of different scatterers hit by the particle in time @xmath34 is proportional to @xmath35 , as follows . in two dimensions , the probability density of the particle being at any point decays as @xmath36 . this means that in a time @xmath34 , the particle comes close ( say , within a radius @xmath37 ) to the point a number of times proportional to the integral of @xmath36 , that is @xmath38 . if the point corresponds to the location of a scatterer , we could say that the particle collides with each scatterer a number of times proportional to @xmath38 . in this case the total number of different scatterers hit by the particle in time @xmath34 might be expected to grow proportional to @xmath35 , which is what we find numerically in fig . [ f : stat ] . ( 300,320)(-70,0 ) ( 0,20 ) ( 155,10)@xmath34 ( -15,165)@xmath39 ( 40,285)l@xmath23 ( 40,275)r@xmath23 ( 40,265)f@xmath23 these observations have the following consequences for the chaotic properties of the infinite models . because the particle returns to each scatterer an infinite number of times , we expect that it passes arbitrarily close to every point in phase space , that is , the system is ergodic . the ks entropy gives the amount of information per unit time required to predict the trajectory knowing its infinite past . the unpredictability has two sources , the instability associated with the collisions in the lorentz gas ( that is , the positive lyapunov exponent ) , and the random positions of the scatterers with which the particle has not yet collided in all the models . the number of different scatterers hit by the particle grows as @xmath35 , so the rate decreases to zero as @xmath40 . we conclude from this argument that the random positions of the scatterers do not contribute to the ks entropy , although results at finite time might suggest otherwise , given that @xmath40 decays so slowly . in other words , pesin s theorem is satisfied for these infinite models also . ) below ) in two dimensions . in three dimensions , the density decays as @xmath41 which is integrable at infinity , so that the particle collides with each scatterer only a finite number of times and thus does not sample the whole phase space . in addition , there is a contribution to the ks entropy from the random positions of the scatterers , thus violating pesin s theorem . there is no contradiction here ; the proofs of pesin s theorem all demand that the phase space be compact . ] we have discussed a number of dynamical properties with regard to our models . the chaotic lorentz gas satisfies more of these properties than the nonchaotic wind - tree models . chaos is defined here by positive ks entropy and is clearly relevant fro diffusion , yet we show in subsequent sections that the periodic orbit properties also appear to be relevant to diffusion . the conclusion discusses an example of a model which is chaotic as it has positive ks entropy , but has periodic orbit properties and diffusive properties more similar to the nonchaotic wind - tree models . although we have a substantial number of relevant numerical results below , a full understanding of the dynamical properties ( ks entropy , periodic orbit properties or perhaps others ) most closely related to diffusion still eludes us . now we discuss diffusive properties . we begin with the diffusion equation , and then relate it to the mean square displacement of a particle . the diffusion equation @xmath42 for a probability density @xmath43 with a constant diffusion coefficient @xmath28 is linear . thus its general solution is an integral over green s functions given by the solution for an initial dirac delta distribution @xmath44 , that is , @xmath45\ ] ] is the conditional probability density that a particle initially at the point @xmath46 will be at the point @xmath47 a time @xmath34 later ; this is therefore a 2-time probability distribution ( or density ) function . the spatial dimension @xmath48 in our case . the diffusion equation is known to hold for the probability density of a particle undergoing deterministic dynamics in a number of systems including the lorentz gas @xcite . in the diffusion equation a macroscopic approximation is used , implying that @xmath43 is an average over space and time scales large compared to the characteristic microscopic lengths and times of the dynamics . the mean square displacement of the particle in the @xmath2-direction after a macroscopic time @xmath34 is obtained from ( [ e : gauss ] ) , @xmath49 where @xmath50 . this is the einstein relation for diffusion . note that @xmath51 is now an explicit function of time . similarly , the fourth and sixth cumulants are @xmath52 respectively . it is also possible to obtain dimensionless forms of the above expressions dividing them by the appropriate power of @xmath53 . in this form the fourth cumulant is usually called the kurtosis , and is a common measure of how close a probability density is to a gaussian distribution . straightforward manipulations applied to the mean square displacement lead to the green - kubo expression for the diffusion coefficient ( if it exists ) @xmath54 where @xmath55 is one ( say the @xmath2- ) component of the velocity and the subscript denotes the time . this shows that the existence of a diffusion coefficient is also related to the rate of decay of the velocity autocorrelation function . the integral diverges if the decay rate of the integrand is @xmath56 or slower , unless the integrand is oscillatory . an oscillatory integrand can not be ruled out , but is not typical for the lorentz gas as observed in numerical simulations . the diffusion equation is the lowest order macroscopic description of the diffusion process . the next approximation , in the direction of microscopic space and time scales , _ ie . _ when the probability density @xmath57 varies sufficiently rapidly , the right hand side of eq . ( [ e : diff ] ) may be augmented by terms such as @xmath58 , where @xmath59 is called the linear super - burnett coefficient @xcite . like the diffusion coefficient , it obeys an einstein relation @xmath60 this is consistent with the zero kurtosis found previously ( [ e : kurt ] ) : to find the kurtosis we divided by @xmath61 which is proportional to @xmath62 if the diffusion coefficient exists , while the burnett coefficient in ( [ e : burn ] ) gives a smaller term ( for large @xmath34 ) , proportional to @xmath34 . the burnett coefficient can also be written in the form of a green - kubo relation in terms of integrals over four - time velocity correlation functions , @xmath63 where @xmath64 as above and @xmath65 etc . a slow decay of the relevant correlation functions leads more easily to a divergence in this case than in eq . ( [ e : gk ] ) @xcite . this means that it is possible to have a well defined diffusion coefficient , but a divergent burnett coefficient , which occurs if the fourth cumulant increases faster than @xmath34 but slower than @xmath62 . we estimate the cumulants defined in eqs . ( [ e : msd]-[e : six ] ) numerically by choosing a large number ( typically @xmath66 ) of random initial conditions for the particle not inside a scatterer , for a single configuration of scatterers . we report only the cumulants in the @xmath2-direction , although we have checked that the @xmath3 distribution is similar . see figs . [ f : msd]-[f : six ] and table [ t : diff ] . ( 500,530)(-100,0 ) ( -100,30 ) ( 170,65 ) ( 155,20)@xmath34 ( -115,265)@xmath53 ( 0,442)@xmath34 ( 0,426)@xmath67 ( 0,410)@xmath62 ( 0,394)l@xmath23 ( 0,378)lp4 ( 0,362)r@xmath23 ( 0,346)rp4 ( 0,330)f@xmath23 ( 0,314)fp4 ( 300,320)(-70,0 ) ( 0,20 ) ( 165,10)@xmath34 ( -25,165)@xmath68 ( 60,261)@xmath34 ( 60,251)@xmath62 ( 60,241)@xmath69 ( 60,232)l@xmath23 ( 60,222)lp4 ( 60,213)r@xmath23 ( 60,203)rp4 ( 60,194)f@xmath23 ( 60,184)fp4 ( 300,320)(-70,0 ) ( 0,20 ) ( 165,10)@xmath34 ( -30,165)@xmath70 ( 60,261)@xmath34 ( 60,251)@xmath62 ( 60,241)@xmath71 ( 60,231)@xmath72 ( 60,222)l@xmath23 ( 60,212)lp4 ( 60,203)r@xmath23 ( 60,193)rp4 ( 60,184)f@xmath23 ( 60,174)fp4 .diffusive properties of our models , in terms of the diffusion coefficient @xmath28 , and the burnett coefficient @xmath59 if they exist . the existence of these coefficients is related to the rate of decay of the velocity autocorrelation functions of ( [ e : gk],[e : gkb ] ) . note that by this criterion , the periodic lorentz gas lp4 is more `` chaotic '' than the infinite lorentz model l@xmath23 , while the periodic fixed orientation wind - tree model fp4 is less `` chaotic '' than the infinite model f@xmath23 . only typical values of the coefficients for the periodic models are given , since they depend on the position of the scatterers . [ t : diff ] [ cols="^,^,^,^",options="header " , ] for five models , [ f , r , l]@xmath23 , [ r , l]p4 , the mean square displacement is found to be proportional to the time , and the fourth and sixth cumulants increase slower than @xmath62 and @xmath71 respectively at large times , indicating that the distribution approaches a gaussian . the exception to this rule is fp4 , for which the mean square displacement grows faster than the time , approximately as @xmath67 and the kurtosis is also nonzero . this superdiffusive behavior is not particularly stable in the sense that the mean square displacement for this model has larger fluctuations than the other models , and the exponent of approximately @xmath73 varies unpredictably between 1 and 2 with the exact positions of the scatterers and the size of the cell ( for example for fp6 or fp8 ) . we now look at how the chaotic and diffusive properties of our models are related in the light of our results , specifically of : ( a ) normal diffusion without chaos , ( b ) superdiffusion without chaos , ( c ) a possible relation between the diffusion coefficient and the periodic orbits , and ( d ) the burnett coefficient of the periodic lorentz gas . in no way does the data presented in figs . [ f : msd]-[f : six ] distinguish between chaotic and nonchaotic models . [ [ normal - diffusion ] ] normal diffusion + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + our results show that it is possible to have a well defined diffusion coefficient and a gaussian distribution function without positive lyapunov exponents , that is , in the f@xmath23 , r@xmath23 and rp4 models . the rp4 model is particularly interesting in this regard , since the two most obvious sources of unpredictability : dispersive collisions and collisions with new randomly placed scatterers , are absent . recall that we argued ( in section [ s : chaos ] ) that these two processes might together determine the ks entropy , that is , the rate of loss of information about the particle s position and velocity . the rp4 model is thus the clearest example of a model in which there is normal diffusion , and zero ks entropy . an example with the same properties , using a periodic rhombus model has been studied in ref . @xcite , where a mean square displacement proportional to the time was observed , but the higher moments were not studied . [ [ superdiffusion ] ] superdiffusion + + + + + + + + + + + + + + the fp4 model , in contrast , has a mean square displacement growing faster than linearly with the time , and a non - gaussian distribution . this can be related to a slow decay of the velocity autocorrelation function ( see above ) , but a physical explanation of why this occurs in the fp4 model but not in the rp4 model is lacking . [ [ diffusion - and - periodic - orbits ] ] diffusion and periodic orbits + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + it is perhaps somewhat hazardous to deduce more from this data than the existence of normal diffusion ; however we would nevertheless like to point out a possible connection between the value of the diffusion coefficient ( given by the vertical displacement of the curves in the inset of fig . [ f : msd ] ) in the infinite models and the properties of periodic orbits discussed in section [ s : isr ] . we make no statement about the diffusion coefficient of the periodic models because this coefficient depends on the position of the scatterers . the idea is that the presence of periodic orbits in a model with randomly positioned scatterers might be expected to lower the diffusion coefficient , since the periodic orbits may keep the particle trapped in roughly the same place ; this takes time without contributing to the mean square displacement . thus we observe that the fixed orientation wind - tree model f@xmath23 has no periodic orbits and has the largest diffusion coefficient ; the random lorentz gas l@xmath23 has periodic orbits , but they are exponentially unstable , and has the next largest diffusion coefficient ; the random orientation wind - tree model r@xmath23 has periodic orbits with power law instability that can inhibit diffusion for a long time , and the diffusion coefficient is the smallest of the three . [ [ the - burnett - coefficient ] ] the burnett coefficient + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + the fourth cumulant grows linearly with time for the lp4 model , indicating a finite burnett coefficient , as expected , given its exponential decay of correlations @xcite . the other models , f@xmath23 , r@xmath23 , rp4 and l@xmath23 have a divergent burnett coefficient , which is not surprising since their decay of correlations is most likely as a power law . thus , from the more subtle properties of the two time ( displacement ) correlation function , we can deduce some properties relating to the rate of decay of higher order correlations , even special four - time ( velocity ) correlations , but not whether there is a positive lyapunov exponent , since l@xmath23 behaves similarly to r@xmath23 from this point of view . even in the intermediate region between the ballistic behavior at small times and the ( super)-diffusive behavior at large times in fig . [ f : msd ] , that is , where the distribution functions are measured at microscopic time scales , there is no clear distinction between the chaotic and nonchaotic models . we have now discussed at some length the connection between chaotic and diffusive properties of our models . while this has yielded valuable insight into how little chaoticity is needed for diffusion to occur , it has not provided us with an understanding of how chaotic and nonchaotic diffusion differ , let alone a method to distinguish chaotic and nonchaotic diffusive systems experimentally . the reason , given in ref . @xcite is that two time correlations ( for example our cumulants ) are insufficient to characterize chaos ; multi - time correlations ( or their underlying probability distributions ) are required . the remaining sections of this paper all use multi - time distributions of one form or another to investigate our models . we begin with a more detailed study of the grassberger - procaccia method than in ref . @xcite , where we found it to incorrectly classify the f@xmath23 model as chaotic . grassberger and procaccia @xcite gave the earliest practical methods for computing chaotic properties such as entropies and dimensions from experimental or computer generated time series . these are still the most popular methods in use , sometimes with minor variations . in ref . @xcite the conclusion of microscopic chaos using data from a brownian motion experiment was based on a slightly different method of cohen and procaccia @xcite . both methods are clearly reviewed in ref . @xcite . we consider these methods as applied to the calculation of the ks entropy @xmath74 , the non - zero value of which characterizes chaos . we recall the discussion of section [ s : chaos ] where we concluded that the wind - tree models all have zero ks entropy , but the lorentz gas has a ks entropy equal to its positive lyapunov exponent . the original grassberger - procaccia method @xcite computes a slightly different dynamical entropy @xmath75 ( defined using the square of the probability , @xmath76 rather than the conventional @xmath77 ) satisfying the inequality @xmath78 . thus a positive estimate @xmath79 implies that @xmath80 and hence chaoticity . we follow ref . @xcite in using an adaptation due to cohen and procaccia @xcite that allows @xmath74 to be estimated directly . we replace the experimental time series of the positions of the brownian particle in ref . @xcite by a numerical time series of any of our infinite or periodic diffusive models , containing the @xmath2 and @xmath3 positions of the particle at @xmath11 times uniformly spaced by a separation @xmath81 . unlike ref . @xcite , by removing data points . the new time step was denoted @xmath82 . we do not need to do this in our numerical work , and we do not use the notation @xmath82 for time steps to avoid confusion with the mean free time . ] our values of @xmath81 , equal to 1 and 0.01 time units are close to the dynamical time scale determined by the mean free time @xmath83 ( see sec . [ s : time ] ) . a single point on our numerical trajectory is denoted @xmath84 , where @xmath85 is an integer ranging from 0 to @xmath86 . for the fixed oriented square ( f ) models the trajectory contains all the phase space information except the velocity which can take only four values in this case . for the randomly oriented square ( r ) and the lorentz ( l ) models the velocity has one continuous degree of freedom . the brownian motion experiment uses only one component ( say , @xmath2 ) of the particle position , ignoring the huge number of other degrees of freedom contained in the fluid system . from a mathematical point of view , as long as the degrees of freedom are all coupled ( that is , all the degrees of freedom depend on each other directly or indirectly ) , this type of method usually converges to the correct entropy ( or dimension ) using as few as one measured variable , however the efficiency may then well be such that an unreasonably large number of data points is required for a reliable estimate of these quantities . a number ( typically @xmath87 to @xmath88 ) of ( in our case non - overlapping ) uniformly spaced subsequences of the long trajectory are denoted `` reference segments '' ( `` reference trajectories '' in ref . @xcite ) , having lengths @xmath89 ranging from 1 to 100 . these reference segments are compared with all subsequences of the trajectory having the same length . the comparison is made according to the position relative to the initial point of each subsequence , with a euclidean metric in real space and a maximum metric over the trajectory . thus , if @xmath85 and @xmath90 give the positions in the full trajectory of the initial points of the @xmath91 reference segments and @xmath92 total segments respectively , the distance between the segments beginning at @xmath85 and @xmath90 is defined as @xmath93 where @xmath94 etc . we are now in a position to count the number of recurrences , in what is called `` pattern probability '' in @xcite . for a given tolerance or spatial resolution @xmath37 we can define the probability of a certain pattern defined by the reference sequence beginning at @xmath85 as the proportion of all the subsequences of the full trajectory that are within a distance ( as defined above ) @xmath37 of the reference sequence : @xmath95\ ] ] and from this the `` pattern entropy '' @xmath96 which gives the information theoretic entropy of the dynamics with respect to the pattern ( of length @xmath89 and resolution @xmath37 ) probability distribution . the pattern entropy thus contains information about the @xmath89-time ( displacement ) distribution functions , as suggested by the discussion at the end of the previous section . when the pattern entropy increases linearly with time in the limit of large @xmath89 , it is possible to define an entropy per unit time , @xmath97\ ] ] in practice @xmath89 is finite , and @xmath74 is always bounded above by @xmath98 ( since it is an average of @xmath99 , where @xmath57 bounded below by @xmath100 ) and tends to saturate towards this value at long times . however , we can often find a large enough linear region in a plot of @xmath74 as a function of @xmath89 ( for fixed @xmath37 and @xmath81 ) to compute @xmath101 . in ref . @xcite @xmath101 was plotted as a function of @xmath37 with different curves corresponding to different @xmath81 . from dimensional arguments it follows that any diffusive process has a scale invariance leading to a dependence @xmath102 , which is in fact observed in such plots . assuming that there is sufficient data that all the limits ( of large @xmath14 , @xmath91 and @xmath89 ) can be approximated reliably , the ks entropy @xmath74 is equal to the maximum value of @xmath101 as @xmath37 and @xmath81 are varied . the measured value @xmath101 will be less than the true ks entropy @xmath74 if the values of @xmath37 and or @xmath81 are so large that not all of the information contained in the dynamics is represented in the time series . this effect does not explain why a nonchaotic system may appear to be chaotic , that is , why the measured value of @xmath101 is greater than @xmath103 , as in ref . @xcite : this must be due to a problem with the above mentioned limits , and we defer a discussion of this point until after we have presented our results . our results for each of the six models [ f , r , l][@xmath23,p4 ] are illustrated in fig . [ f : gpl ] with @xmath104 and in fig . [ f : gps ] with @xmath105 . the case @xmath104 samples the motion of the particle as it begins to diffuse among the scatterers . the models ( both chaotic and nonchaotic ) are indistinguishable , with the linear growth of the pattern entropy suggesting positive ks entropy , except that the superdiffusive model fp4 is showing signs that the ks entropy is zero , as a nonchaotic model should . ( 330,530)(-70,0 ) ( 0,360 ) ( 170,360 ) ( 0,190 ) ( 170,190 ) ( 0,20 ) ( 170,20 ) ( 85,10)@xmath89 ( -65,95)@xmath106 ( -10,480)f ( -10,310)r ( -10,140)l ( 85,515)@xmath23 ( 245,515)p4 ( 330,530)(-70,0 ) ( 0,360 ) ( 170,360 ) ( 0,190 ) ( 170,190 ) ( 0,20 ) ( 170,20 ) ( 85,10)@xmath89 ( -65,95)@xmath106 ( -10,480)f ( -10,310)r ( -10,140)l ( 85,515)@xmath23 ( 245,515)p4 for @xmath105 ( fig . [ f : gps ] ) , where mostly ballistic behavior occurs , the graphs of pattern entropy vs. number of time steps is no longer linear . the r and l models look much the same , while the f models have an unusual feature when the pattern entropy is equal to @xmath107 which is due to the four available wind directions , that is , only a fourth of the trajectories at a given @xmath108 point are close in phase space after a certain time . the pattern entropy is becoming linear at larger times in all models , suggesting positive ks entropy . we can draw the following conclusions about the use of grassberger - procaccia type methods for this class of problems : ( a ) measurements need to be made at microscopic time scales , ( b ) even at microscopic time scales , the method does not seem to distinguish between chaotic and nonchaotic dynamics , and ( c ) the reason seems to be that unfeasibly long time series are needed in order to do that . [ [ macroscopic - measurements ] ] macroscopic measurements + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + it is clear that in an analysis as explained above , using large distance and time scales a diffusive system shows itself as almost independent of its microscopic dynamics ( whether chaotic , non - chaotic or stochastic ) , although we can not exclude the possibility that an unreasonably long trajectory might still give some evidence of weak correlations that survive for macroscopic times . in the brownian motion experiment , for example , there are of the order of @xmath109 collisions of the brownian particle with the surrounding solvent between each measurement of its position , so any correlations arising from , say , nonchaotic microscopic dynamics would be effectively averaged out between measurements . this is essential from the point of view of designing future experiments , but it is not the full story as it does not explain our results , which are obtained using short times . the brownian motion experiment could not investigate the motion at short time scales , but it is important to know whether data from an improved experiment might determine the microscopic chaoticity in principle . [ [ microscopic - measurements ] ] microscopic measurements + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + our results do not suggest that the grassberger - procaccia type methods can distinguish between chaotic and nonchaotic diffusive models even at short times because the nonchaotic r models consistently give the same results as the chaotic l models . the only distinctions we have been able to make are between diffusion and superdiffusion for @xmath104 , and between the continuous velocity space of the r and l models and the four velocity directions of the f models . both of these distinctions can be made from a time series without using the intensive analysis of the grassberger - procaccia method . [ [ how - long - a - time - series - is - required ] ] how long a time series is required ? + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + our wind - tree models appear unpredictable ( in the sense of positive ks entropy ) because it takes the system some time to `` realize '' that it is nonchaotic , in other words , quite a long time series length @xmath14 is required . for example , the most pronounced nonchaotic diffusive model we have is rp4 . once the particle `` knows '' the positions and orientations of all the scatterers , the system is completely predictable , and hence a zero ks entropy is manifest . however it is necessary for the particle to enumerate the large number of ways of achieving this combinations . the eight collisions could occur in any order , giving an extra factor of @xmath110 . thus our estimate is @xmath111 . note that collisions may not be able to occur in any order ( thus lowering the estimate ) , but we have ignored situations where the particle collides with three or four sides of a scatterer , or with the same sides more than once ( thus greatly increasing the estimate ) . the trajectory length would need to be substantially larger than the true number of ways the particle can determine the scatterer configuration , in order to obtain reasonable statistics , so that nonchaotic recurrences dominate . ] with sufficient statistics that nonchaotic recurrences dominate the gp calculation , for which our trajectory length of @xmath112 is apparently insufficient . for the infinite models such as r@xmath23 the motion of the particle is never completely predictable , but the proportion of collisions that the particle encounters new scatterers decreases as @xmath40 according to the discussion of sec . [ s : chaos ] . the measurement of such a slow decrease is far beyond the capabilities of any feasible implementation of the grassberger - procaccia method . since the grassberger - procaccia approach does not seem to distinguish our chaotic and nonchaotic diffusive models , we turn to an alternative time series analysis method , with a view towards suggesting possible methods for analyzing future experiments that are able to sample the dynamics on microscopic time scales . such a method can not possibly enumerate all possible trajectory segments , as discussed above , but there are certain types of trajectory segments , namely those that are almost periodic , that stand out as predictable in a nonchaotic system . the method of the next section takes advantage of this property , and in effect distinguishes chaotic and nonchaotic systems by singling out this subset of all possible recurrences . we have seen in sec . [ s : gp ] that the variant of the grassberger - procaccia method used by gaspard et al can not distinguish between nonchaotic and chaotic models , for the reason that the time series ( either experimental or numerical ) is not long enough to provide a reasonable approximation to the infinite time limit implied by the method . we can attempt to circumvent this difficulty by looking for specific types of recurrences , as opposed to taking an average over all types of recurring trajectory segments . in particular we will show that a promising candidate for a useful specific recurrence is given by one that corresponds to an orbit that is almost periodic ( again , within a spatial tolerance @xmath37 ) . we can identify these almost periodic orbits as those that repeat ( within a distance @xmath37 ) their previous motion at equally spaced intervals of time , hence the name `` almost periodic recurrences '' ( apr ) . if we compare the apr approach with the grassberger - procaccia ( gp ) method , there are a number of similarities and differences . both methods are designed to deduce dynamical properties from time series data . gp aims to make quantitative statements about the ks entropy , whereas apr as yet only provides a qualitative statement about chaoticity as expressed in periodic orbit properties , which are not equivalent to the usual definition of chaos as positive ks entropy . both methods make use of the probability of recurrences . gp then averages over many probabilities , while apr singles out a few especially significant recurrences . this means , for example that in an intermittent system , where the dynamics switches irregularly from chaotic to regular behavior , gp measures only the average , chaotic , dynamics , while apr is sensitive to the lack of chaoticity in the regular regions of phase space . in other words , an intermittent system can have a positive lyapunov exponent , and also periodic orbits with nonchaotic properties . the apr method characterizes such a system as nonchaotic , which is an appropriate designation with regard to diffusive properties as we observe in sec . [ s : esc ] below , but which is inappropriate from the usual point of view , which is that chaos is defined as positive ks entropy . an example of such an intermittent system is given in the final discussion . we now discuss the properties of periodic orbits in chaotic and nonchaotic systems ( particularly our models ) , before describing the apr method in more detail and presenting the results . periodic orbits are of great importance in chaotic systems . although typical trajectories ( as defined by the liouville or natural measures ) are not periodic , there are many systems for which they are approximated by periodic orbits when the periodic orbits are dense in the phase space or on an attractor . this allows many properties to be computed from expansions involving periodic orbits @xcite . the properties of the periodic orbits are not directly related to the other dynamical properties discussed in sec . [ s : chaos ] , yet they do tend to differ between chaotic and nonchaotic systems , and so they constitute additional dynamical properties related to chaos . the properties of the periodic orbits in the lorentz gas are of most interest to us , and in some sense typical for chaotic systems , so we focus on these . in this and the following section we examine two relevant properties of periodic orbits , and sketch proofs of these properties . [ [ existence ] ] existence + + + + + + + + + there is an easy constructive proof of the existence of periodic orbits in the lorentz gas : choose two disks arbitrarily ; the line joining their centers gives a periodic orbit unless there is a disk interposing ; consider one of the original disks and the interposing disk , and repeat until no disk interposes . [ [ stability ] ] stability + + + + + + + + + the periodic orbits are exponentially unstable , that is , almost all trajectories beginning a small distance @xmath37 from the periodic orbit at time @xmath113 are at a distance @xmath114 at time @xmath34 , where @xmath115 is the maximum ( here the only positive ) lyapunov exponent , which depends on the periodic orbit @xmath116 . this exponential instability makes it very unlikely for a typical trajectory to remain near a given periodic orbit for long times . we study here the properties of periodic orbits of our wind - tree models , which are typical of nonchaotic systems , without attempting to classify all possible nonchaotic periodic behavior . for a complementary study of the periodic orbits in polygonal billiards , see ref . @xcite . not all wind - tree models have periodic orbits . the argument given above for the lorentz gas fails because an orbit connecting two square scatterers is periodic only if the scatterers have the same orientation ( of zero probability in the randomly oriented model ) and the particle moves perpendicular to the surface of the scatterers ( excluded by definition in the fixed orientation model ) . in general , the existence of periodic orbits depends on the locations and orientations of the scatterers . we will find that using generic locations of scatterers periodic orbits exist in the r@xmath23 model , but not in the f@xmath23 model . the periodic models ( such as fp4 and rp4 ) are harder to treat mathematically , and are not discussed here . [ [ f - model - nonexistence ] ] f model : nonexistence + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + the absence of periodic orbits for generic configurations of the f@xmath23 model follows directly from arguments in a proof of aarnes @xcite . in order for the particle to return to its starting point , an expression linear in the positions of the scatterers must vanish . the coefficients of the @xmath108 position of a scatterer in this expression are integers depending on which faces the particle hits , and are zero only if the particle hits opposite faces an equal number of times . a simple _ reductio ad absurdum _ argument shows then that there is a scatterer ( perhaps more than one ) , the furthest to the top and right ( largest value of @xmath117 ) , which has collisions on only one of its faces ( the lower left ) , and hence the coefficients corresponding to the position of this scatterer are nonzero . if the scatterers are randomly placed , no linear combination of the positions can vanish , so no periodic orbit can exist . of course , there are special configurations of the scatterers ( such as at the corners of a square aligned with the coordinate axes ) that allow periodic orbits . since there are therefore generically no periodic orbits in the f@xmath23 model , the remainder of this section refers to the r@xmath23 model . [ [ r - model - existence ] ] r model : existence + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + the existence of periodic orbits for generic configurations of the r@xmath23 model follows from the observation that any set of configurations of a finite number of ( _ eg . _ 3 ) scatterers with nonzero ( lesbesgue ) measure includes configurations appearing somewhere in a generic infinite configuration . a period 3 orbit can always be found in an acute triangular billiard by minimizing the total path length , see fig . [ f : tri ] . if three scatterers outline an acute triangle and are positioned so that their faces contain the path of minimal length ( clearly of nonzero measure ) , a period 3 orbit exists . ( 280,280)(-50,0 ) ( 0,0 ) [ [ r - model - stability ] ] r model : stability + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + finally we investigate the stability of periodic orbits in the r@xmath23 model . the combination of the linear dynamics of the free particle with length preserving reflections leads to a linear separation of nearby trajectories . that is , an initial separation of @xmath37 in the direction of the velocity leads to a separation @xmath118 in the position after time @xmath34 . another way of saying this is that the number of uniformly distributed trajectories remaining within a distance @xmath37 of the periodic orbit is @xmath119 for large @xmath34 . thus a particle in the r@xmath23 model is quite likely to spend a long time near a periodic orbit , in contrast to in the lorentz gas . now we return to our method of almost periodic recurrences for distinguishing chaotic properties of diffusive systems from a time series . this consists of counting the number of almost periodic sequences in the time series , thus hoping to exploit the different properties of periodic orbits in chaotic and nonchaotic systems as discussed in the previous two sections . as in the grassberger - procaccia method we begin with a time series containing @xmath11 positions of the particle @xmath84 spaced at a time interval @xmath104 , see sec . [ s : time ] . analogous to eq . ( [ e : dist ] ) we define a distance between two segments of length @xmath120 ( the period of an almost periodic orbit ) that begin at points @xmath85 and @xmath90 on the trajectory , @xmath121 using eq . ( [ e : dt ] ) we compute the number of initial points @xmath85 for which the orbit repeats within a tolerance @xmath37 , @xmath122\ ] ] where we use @xmath123 for the results presented in fig . [ f : isr ] . ( 330,470)(-50,0 ) ( 0,320 ) ( 150,320 ) ( 0,170 ) ( 150,170 ) ( 0,20 ) ( 150,20 ) ( 85,10)@xmath120 ( -15,95)@xmath124 ( -10,430)f ( -10,280)r ( -10,130)l ( 85,460)@xmath23 ( 235,460)p4 it is clear that the chaotic lorentz models , with an exponential decay of @xmath124 with @xmath120 can be easily distinguished from the nonchaotic f and r models which mostly have a slower and noisier decay , so we have achieved our objective of finding a time series analysis method that can distinguish between time series of chaotic and nonchaotic diffusive systems . it remains for us to explain the difference , and the plots obtained using the properties of the periodic orbits in these systems . for that , we note that there are two types of ( almost ) periodic orbits that might appear in the expression for @xmath124 : an orbit of length @xmath120 that has been ( almost ) repeated , and a shorter orbit of length @xmath125 that has appeared @xmath126 times , so that the total time is equal to @xmath127 . [ [ the - l - models ] ] the l models + + + + + + + + + + + + in the lorentz gas , the probability of remaining near a periodic orbit for a time @xmath120 is of order @xmath128 ( see sec . [ s : cpo ] ) , where @xmath115 is the maximum ( here the only ) positive lyapunov exponent , and depends on the periodic orbit @xmath116 . this is why both the infinite and periodic lorentz gases give an exponential form in fig . [ f : isr ] . because @xmath124 can be due to long orbits or repeats of short orbits , the exponential form depends on both ( 1 ) the exponential escape from short orbits with many repetitions and ( 2 ) the exponential instability of orbits with length , that is , that @xmath115 does not approach zero for long orbits . could become arbitrarily small . however , the probability of a long free path is also exponentially small , so the result is still exponential . ] [ [ the - r - models ] ] the r models + + + + + + + + + + + + in the randomly oriented wind - tree models , the probability of remaining near a periodic orbit for a time @xmath120 is of order @xmath129 ( see sec . [ s : npo ] ) . this form is not immediately apparent in fig . [ f : isr ] because orbits ( particularly those surviving for long times ) can be counted more than once due to contributions from an interval of different initial points @xmath85 . both the r@xmath23 model and the rp4 model continue beyond @xmath130 due to increasingly rare long orbits and many repeats of shorter orbits . for example , the almost periodic orbit giving rise to the conspicuous point with period @xmath131 in the rp4 model is repeated many times , also contributing to multiples of the period , double @xmath132114,115 ; triple @xmath132172,173 ; and so on up to @xmath1321033,1034 . it is clear that the dynamics is completely different to that of a chaotic system . [ [ the - f - models ] ] the f models + + + + + + + + + + + + in the fixed oriented wind - tree models , there are no periodic orbits ( see sec . [ s : npo ] ) . this means that any contribution to @xmath124 is due to orbits that are close to periodic . the infinite model f@xmath23 contains many arrangements of a few scatterers that come arbitrarily close to generating a true periodic orbit , so the plot is similar to that of the r models . the periodic model fp4 , in contrast , has only a few short orbits that are at all close to periodic , and none that can be repeated to give further contributions at higher values of @xmath120 , or these would be observed in the figure . what we have presented here barely scratches the surface of the almost periodic recurrences method and its variants . it would be quite easy to search for 3 or more occurrences of an ( almost ) periodic orbit , or to distinguish between a single repeat of a long orbit and many repeats of a short orbit . we have restricted the presentation here to a demonstration of the method as a means to distinguish time series of chaotic and nonchaotic diffusive systems , but we hope that it will be useful in more general contexts . the case of absorbing boundary conditions provides a rich context for illuminating the differences between chaotic and nonchaotic diffusion . this is because the diffusion equation with absorbing boundary conditions leads naturally to an exponential escape process , while the periodic orbits of the randomly oriented wind - tree model require a power law escape process ( see sec . [ s : npo ] ) , thus violating the diffusion equation . we consider here the probability that a single randomly placed particle will remain in an open system for a given time , or equivalently , the number of identical noninteracting particles remaining in the system after the same time . for chaotic dynamics the escape rate formalism of gaspard and nicolis @xcite uses the escape rate ( defined below ) to connect the diffusion coefficient to dynamical properties such as the ks entropy and the positive lyapunov exponents . for nonchaotic systems the escape process is qualitatively different depending on the properties of the periodic orbits as we have noted above , and the escape rate formalism must be generalized , if it is to make any sense at all . we now describe the escape rate formalism as it applies to chaotic systems , discuss the results for our models , and then attempt to generalize the formalism to include nonchaotic systems . a macroscopic description of escape on a square ( for simplicity ; other geometries are analogous ) is given by the diffusion equation ( [ e : diff ] ) for the particle density @xmath43 , together with the boundary condition @xmath133 along the lines @xmath134 , @xmath135 , @xmath136 and @xmath137 . the general solution is @xmath138 with the decay rate @xmath139 at long times , the solution is dominated by the slowest decaying mode , corresponding to the escape rate @xmath140 note that the escape of particles is exponential in ( [ e : diffsol ] ) . the escape rate formalism equates this macroscopic escape rate @xmath141 with the ( exponential ) escape rate of a ( microscopically ) chaotic system , which is related to its ks entropy @xmath74 and the sum of its positive lyapunov exponents @xmath142 ( here at most a single positive lyapunov exponent ) by @xcite @xmath143 the `` escape rate formula '' which generalizes pesin s formula ( sec . [ s : chaos ] ) to open systems . not only can the escape rate of chaotic systems be calculated from periodic orbit theory @xcite , but , as we will show below , there is an intimate connection between periodic orbits and the escape process in nonchaotic systems . we now present our numerical results , from which we learn how the above theory for chaotic systems is modified in the nonchaotic case . as described in sec . [ s : comp ] , the arrangement of scatterers used is the same as in the periodic case with @xmath13 ; the absorbing boundaries are one distance unit from the edge of the periodic cell , leading to an open system of size @xmath144 . as before we use fixed oriented squares ( f ) , randomly oriented squares ( r ) or circles ( l ) . we denote absorbing boundary conditions by a , so the full notation for these models is [ f , r , l]a18 . we place @xmath145 particles uniformly ( without overlapping the scatterers ) in the square of size @xmath144 and compute the number of particles remaining in the system as a function of time , see figs . [ f : esc ] , [ f : esc2 ] . ( 300,320)(-50,0 ) ( 0,20 ) ( 165,10)@xmath34 ( -15,165)@xmath146 ( 300,320)(-50,0 ) ( 0,20 ) ( 165,10)@xmath34 ( -15,165)@xmath146 the chaotic lorentz gas exhibits exponential decay as predicted by the diffusion equation for all times , but the nonchaotic wind - tree models deviate from exponential decay at late times . the results are well described by the empirical expressions @xmath147 for the l , r and f models respectively over the range of times considered . the initial exponential decay may be compared with eqs . ( [ e : diffsol]-[e : er ] ) to give an effective diffusion coefficient . we find @xmath148 , @xmath149 and @xmath150 , which are certainly consistent with the results of the mean square displacement , tab . [ t : diff ] in sec . [ s : diff ] , given that eqs . ( [ e : diffsol]-[e : er ] ) depend on the macroscopic diffusion equations , and so require a large system @xmath151 limit . the coefficient @xmath152 is obtained by matching eq . ( [ e : diffsol ] ) to the uniform probability density of the initial conditions ; this comes to @xmath153 with @xmath154 as the initial number of particles in the system . from this close agreement , we conclude that the early escape is well described by the diffusion equation with the same diffusion coefficient that appears in the mean square displacement of sec . [ s : diff ] ; there is no trace of non - diffusive behavior at short times . [ [ the - r - model ] ] the r model + + + + + + + + + + + we now discuss the long time behavior of the nonchaotic models . the randomly oriented wind - tree model has a @xmath36 decay in ( [ e : r ] ) due to its periodic orbits ; particles that are initially close to a periodic orbit lead to this power law as described in sec . [ s : npo ] . the coefficient gives an estimate of the density of periodic orbits ; @xmath155 is quite small compared to the number of particles , @xmath145 , so periodic orbits are relatively rare in a sense that is difficult to define precisely . in terms of the escape rate formalism , a power law decay corresponds to an escape rate @xmath156 which trivially satisfies ( [ e : erf ] ) , but yields no information about the diffusion coefficient @xmath28 , that is , ( [ e : er ] ) is not satisfied . [ [ the - f - model ] ] the f model + + + + + + + + + + + the fixed oriented wind - tree model shows a complete escape of all the particles in a finite time , as might be expected from the lack of periodic orbits . the dramatic transition from the initial exponential decay to a much slower ( at first ) linear decay is somewhat surprising . we interpret this as follows : while there are no exactly periodic orbits in the f model , it is possible for the particle to remain in an orbit that is nearly periodic for some time , allowing the particle to remain in the system longer than the exponential decay would predict . if there is a bundle of trajectories that survive for just 800 time units , then this would lead to a linear law because particles are initially evenly distributed along the bundle of trajectories . if there was , in addition , a large bundle of trajectories that survive for , say 500 time units , there would be a kink in the plot , with a sharp decrease in gradient at @xmath157 . the observation that the curve is close to linear ( see fig . [ f : esc2 ] ) thus implies that the lengths of these long living trajectories are strongly peaked around 800 time units . one such long lived orbit is depicted in fig . [ f : traj ] ; its length is seen to be due to two almost periodic orbits . the complete escape of the particles corresponds to an escape rate @xmath158 , which flagrantly violates both ( [ e : er ] ) and ( [ e : erf ] ) and yields no information about the diffusion coefficient @xmath28 . ( 350,350)(-50,0 ) ( 0,0 ) ( 55,150)a ( 65,270)b we conclude from these observations that , although the wind - tree models satisfy the diffusion equation when there are no boundaries , that is , the two time distribution function is of the correct gaussian form , such a macroscopic approximation is not valid when there are absorbing boundary conditions . this means we can not determine the diffusion coefficient in the same way as for the lorentz gas , eqs . ( [ e : diffsol]-[e : er ] ) , that is , from @xmath159 because the infinite time limit leads to zero or infinity as explained above . here @xmath160 is the probability of a particles remaining in a system of size @xmath9 for time @xmath34 ; this is obtained by observing many independent particles , and taking the limit of an infinite number of particles . we can , however , attempt to calculate the diffusion coefficient in the finite wind - tree models by taking the @xmath161 limit at the same time as the @xmath151 limit . this is because the diffusion equation is a good approximation even in the open case as long as the time is not too long , and the decay remains exponential . for example , assuming that the `` density of periodic orbits '' in the ra model is independent of @xmath9 ( which seems to be the case numerically ) , the transition time from exponential to power law decay , as determined by comparing the two terms in eq . ( [ e : r ] ) using eq . ( [ e : er ] ) is of order @xmath162 . this should be compared with the time scale for which the slowest decaying mode of the diffusion equation dominates , @xmath163 , see ( [ e : gmn ] ) . thus , for a given @xmath9 , there is a narrow range in time @xmath164 in which the decay is exponential , and in which a limit can be taken to obtain @xmath28 from the escape process . for example we can combine the @xmath9 and @xmath34 limits by setting @xmath165 and @xmath166 , @xmath167 we expect this relation to hold for all the models [ l , r , f]a . we emphasize that eq . ( [ e : narrow ] ) , if it is mathematically valid , still does not provide a practical method for computing the diffusion coefficient beyond the estimates we gave following eq . ( [ e : f ] ) . this is because the range of time scales @xmath164 grows so slowly with @xmath9 that extremely large system sizes are required for more precise estimates of @xmath28 . we can also turn the argument around , and suggest that the escape at long times of finite systems may be a good experimental technique for detecting ( or ruling out at some level ) nonchaotic microscopic dynamics . in any case , the range of validity of the diffusion equation as a macroscopic description of nonchaotic systems is restricted . we have explored the connections between microscopic chaos and diffusion . on a superficial level , the details of the microscopic dynamics seem to have little effect on the diffusion process : gaussian diffusion is observed in our rp4 model , which has scatterers with flat sides ( hence no exponential separation of nearby trajectories ) and is periodic ( hence there is no source of randomness from a disordered environment ) . in addition , the grassberger - procaccia method of time series analysis can not distinguish our chaotic and nonchaotic diffusive models because it would require impractically long data sets . on a deeper level , however , the subtle differences between chaotic and nonchaotic diffusion are quite apparent if you know where to look : our time series analysis method based on periodic orbits has no trouble distinguishing between the chaotic and nonchaotic models , and the long time behavior of escape from an open system is also determined by the properties of the chaotic versus nonchaotic periodic orbits . in the light of our results , we can make a few concrete suggestions for an experimental determination of the chaotic or nonchaotic properties in a diffusive system . firstly , as we remarked in ref . @xcite , it is necessary to make measurements on the distance and time scales relevant to the microscopic dynamics . in our models , this question is simplified by the fact that all microscopic time scales are of order one in our units , sec . [ s : time ] . once this is achieved , one could use an approach based on the method of almost periodic recurrences , which searches for periodic behavior ; alternatively the late time decay of particles from an open system can also elicit the chaotic or nonchaotic nature of the dynamics . this raises again the question of exactly what dynamical properties would be measured ; there are systems with the positive ks entropy of the lorentz gas as well as the power law unstable periodic orbits of the wind - tree models . we will now make some remarks about such systems , although we make no attempt to enumerate all degrees and classes of chaotic dynamics . our example in this discussion is a model containing both circular and randomly oriented square scatterers . the circular scatterers lead , as in the lorentz gas , to a positive lyapunov exponent , while the square scatterers lead , as in the randomly oriented wind - tree model , to power law unstable periodic orbits , using the same argument as in sec . [ s : npo ] . we have not simulated such a model numerically ; however the arguments used in the previous sections may be applied , leading to the following predictions : sec . [ s : conn ] : there will be a positive diffusion coefficient with a gaussian distribution function , as in both the l and r models . [ s : gp ] : the grassberger - procaccia method will describe the dynamics as chaotic , due to a positive lyapunov exponent and hence positive ks entropy , as in the l models . sec . [ s : isr ] : the apr method will describe the dynamics as nonchaotic , due to the power law unstable periodic orbits , as in the r models . sec . [ s : esc ] : such a system with absorbing boundaries will exhibit power law escape at long times , again due to the periodic orbits , as in the r model . the different conclusions reached by the gp and apr methods exemplify the fact that these methods are based on different dynamical properties ; for diffusion in an open system , it is clear that the mixed model is most similar to the r model , and hence that the apr method distinguishes the relevant dynamical property in this case . we conclude with some open questions and possibilities for further work . in terms of _ microscopic chaos _ , we have studied only a few models . we note that there are examples of lack of chaoticity we have not considered , such as the coexistence of chaotic and nonchaotic regions found in kam theory . in terms of _ diffusion _ , we note that in the light of sec . [ s : esc ] the diffusion equation is not a complete macroscopic description of nonchaotic diffusion . in terms of _ time series analysis _ , our apr method , while sufficient for our purposes here , could be much more developed and applied . with regard to _ periodic orbit theory _ , the methods developed for exploiting the importance of periodic orbits to compute properties of chaotic systems @xcite do not apply to nonchaotic systems , and yet we have seen that periodic orbits also play an important role in nonchaotic systems . we note that our infinite models , while sharing some of the properties of corresponding finite billiards , appear to fall outside the domain of current mathematics . for example , a recent study of infinite billiard systems @xcite is mostly restricted to cases with finite areas that are finitely connected ; our models obey neither of these conditions . it would be interesting to see if it is possible to rigorously determine the status of our models , particularly their ergodic properties , rate of decay of correlations and kolmogorov - sinai entropy within the framework of some mathematical theory of infinite nonchaotic systems . more generally , a mathematical understanding of statistical mechanics including the thermodynamic limit naturally leads to the study of infinite systems . finally , we remark that all the models we have considered with the exception of one ( fp4 ) are diffusive , limiting our investigation as to the presence of microscopic chaos or not to such systems . in addition , the precise role played by microscopic chaos as represented by the lyapunov exponents and `` macroscopic chaos '' , as embodied by the randomly placed scatterers for the existence of a diffusion process and the value of the diffusion coefficient , remains open . a similar but more complicated situation obtains when diffusion of momentum ( viscosity ) or energy ( heat conduction ) and other transport processes are considered . first of all we want to acknowledge that h. van beijeren suggested the wind - tree model as an important alternative to the lorentz gas for the study of microscopic chaoticity and diffusion , which led to the work of ref . @xcite and this paper . we thank him also , along with l. bunimovich , j. r. dorfman , p. gaspard and i. procaccia for stimulating and helpful discussions . this work was supported by the engineering research program of the office of basic energy sciences of the us department of energy under contract # de - fg02 - 88-er13847 . we give here a calculation of the mean free time for our models quoted in sec . [ s : time ] . our derivation is due to chernov @xcite , extended to the fixed oriented model , and with a technical caveat for the infinite models . refer to sec . [ s : comp ] for the definitions of @xmath168 , @xmath9 , @xmath14 and @xmath169 . the mean free time @xmath83 is equal to the mean free path , since the velocity is one . the mean free time is known exactly for billiard systems@xcite , which include the [ r , l]p models discussed here . we make a minor extension to allow the fp model ( which differs because we do not want to allow all velocity directions ) . we expect that the formula for the mean free time would still hold in the infinite models on physical grounds , but we can not justify this mathematically . briefly , the argument in ref . @xcite observes that the total volume of phase space @xmath170 can be computed in two different ways . one expression for the volume of phase space is as an integral over the area of the billiard , giving @xmath171 for the original wind - tree model with fixed orientations , and @xmath172 for random orientations or the lorentz gas . here , @xmath170 is the volume of phase space , including both position and velocity , while @xmath173 is the area accessible to the point particle . for our infinite billiards we think of a large but finite periodic system of length @xmath9 , and formally take the limit @xmath151 at the end of the calculation . since the area @xmath173 is equal to @xmath174 , we have @xmath175 here as @xmath22 . the prefactor @xmath176 comes from the four possible wind directions , and the @xmath177 from integrating over all possible directions . putting these expressions together we have @xmath178 for fixed oriented squares and @xmath179 for randomly oriented squares or circles . an alternative expression for the volume of phase space is an integral over the boundary of the billiard , where the contribution from each point is given by the free path / time @xmath82 . in this way we find @xmath180 for fixed oriented squares and @xmath181 for randomly oriented squares or circles . here @xmath57 is the length of the boundary , that is , the total perimeter of all the scatterers , @xmath83 is the _ mean _ free path / time , and the numerical prefactor is the integral over the component of velocity perpendicular to the boundary . for the wind - tree models we have @xmath182 where @xmath14 is the number of scatterers , so @xmath183 ; for the lorentz gas , we have @xmath184 . comparing the expressions for @xmath170 in both calculations , we find @xmath185 ( using our value of @xmath22 ) for the case of fixed oriented squares , @xmath186 for the case of random oriented squares , and @xmath187 for the lorentz gas . p. gaspard , m. e. briggs , m. k. francis , j. v. sengers , r. w. gammon , j. r. dorfman , and r. v. calabrese , nature * 394 * , 865 ( 1998 ) . c. p. dettmann , e. g. d. cohen and h. van beijeren , nature * 401 * , 875 ( 1999 ) . a. cohen and i. procaccia , phys . a * 31 * , 1872 ( 1985 ) . p. grassberger and i. procaccia , phys . rev . a * 28 * , 2591 ( 1983 ) . e. h. hauge and e. g. d. cohen , j. math . phys . * 10 * , 397 ( 1969 ) . h. van beijeren , rev . mod . phys . * 54 * , 195 ( 1982 ) . p. gaspard , _ chaos , scattering and statistical mechanics _ ( cambridge university press , cambridge , 1998 ) . w. w. wood and f. lado , j. comp . * 7 * , 528 ( 1971 ) . eckmann and d. ruelle , rev . mod . phys . * 57 * , 617 ( 1985 ) . young , ann . math . * 147 * , 585 ( 1998 ) . n. i. chernov and c. p. dettmann , physica a * 279 * , 37 ( 2000 ) . e. gutkin , j. stat . phys . * 83 * , 7 ( 1996 ) . m. wojtkowski , commun . phys . * 105 * , 391 ( 1986 ) . s. lepri , l. rondoni , and g. benettin , chao - dyn/9909004 . gaspard , adv . * xcix * , 369 ( 1997 ) . cvitanovi et al . d. biswas , pramana - j . phys . * 48 * , 487 ( 1997 ) . j. f. aarnes `` an ergodic problem for r - polygons '' dept . of mathematics , technical university of trondheim , norway ( unpublished,1974 ) . p. gaspard and g. nicolis , phys . lett . * 65 * , 1693 ( 1990 ) . p. gaspard and j. r. dorfman , phys . e * 52 * , 3525 ( 1995 ) . s. troubetzkoy , nonlinearity * 12 * , 293 ( 1999 ) . n. chernov , j. stat . phys . * 88 * , 1 ( 1997 ) . Abstract:

Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.

Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered . Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video . Paper: graph models have been used in image analysis for a long time . the edited book @xcite gives an overview of methods in this field . however , approaches from quantitative graph theory such as graph indices have not played a significant role in these applications so far . this is to some extent surprising as it is not a far - fetched idea to model information contained in small patches of a textured image by graphs , and once this has been done , graph indices with their ability to extract in a quantitative form structural information from large collections of graphs lend themselves as a promising tool specifically for texture analysis . a first step in this direction has been made in @xcite where a set of texture descriptors was introduced that combines a construction of graphs from image patches with well - known graph indices . this set of texture descriptors was evaluated in @xcite in the context of a texture discrimination task . in @xcite , an example for texture - based image segmentation was presented based on this work . the present paper continues the work begun in @xcite and @xcite . its purpose is twofold . on one hand , it restates and slightly extends the experimental work from @xcite on texture segmentation , focussing on those descriptors that are based on entropy measures , which turned out particularly useful in the previous contributions . on the other hand , it undertakes a first attempt to analyse the graph - index based texture descriptors with regard to what kind of information they actually extract from a textured image . [ [ structure - of - the - paper . ] ] structure of the paper . + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + the remaining part of section [ sec - intro ] briefly outlines the fields of research that are combined in this work , namely quantitative graph theory , see section [ ssec - introqgt ] , graph models in image analysis with emphasis on the pixel graph and its edge - weighted variant , see section [ ssec - introgmia ] , and finally texture analysis , section [ ssec - introtex ] . in section [ sec - gi ] the construction of graph - entropy - based texture descriptors from @xcite is detailed . section [ sec - gac ] gives a brief account of the geodesic active contour method , a well - established approach for image segmentation that is based on the numerical solution of a partial differential equation . texture segmentation combining the graph - entropy - based texture descriptors with the geodesic active contour method is demonstrated on two synthetic examples that represent typical realistic texture segmentation tasks , and a real - world example in section [ sec - segex ] . some theoretical analysis is presented in section [ sec - tdana ] where ( one setup of ) graph - entropy - based texture descriptors is put into relation with fractal dimension measurements on a metric space derived from the pixel graph , and thus a connection is established between graph entropy methods and fractal - based texture descriptors . a short conclusion , section [ sec - conc ] , ends the paper . quantitative measures for graphs have been developed for almost sixty years in mathematical chemistry as a means to analyse molecular graphs @xcite . in the course of time , numerous _ graph indices _ have been derived based on edge connectivity , vertex degrees , distances , and information - theoretic concepts , see e.g. the work @xcite that classifies over @xmath1 descriptors from literature and subjects them to a large - scale statistical evaluation on several test data sets . recently , interesting new graph indices based on the so - called hosoya polynomial have been proposed @xcite . fields of application have diversified in the last decades to include e.g. biological and social networks , and other structures that can mathematically be modelled as graphs , see @xcite . efforts to apply statistical methods to graph indices across these areas have been bundled in the emerging field of _ quantitative graph theory _ @xcite . many contributions in this field group around the tasks of distinguishing and classifying graphs , and quantifying the differences between graphs . the first task focusses on the ability of indices to _ uniquely _ distinguish large sets of individual graphs , termed _ discrimination power _ @xcite . for the latter task , _ inexact graph matching , _ the _ graph edit distance _ @xcite or other measures quantifying the size of substructures that are shared or not shared between two graphs are of particular importance , see also @xcite . the concept of discrimination power has to be complemented for this purpose by the principle of _ smoothness _ of measures , see @xcite , which describes how similar the values of a measure are when it is applied to similar graphs . in @xcite , the quantitative measures of _ structure sensitivity _ and _ abruptness _ have been introduced in order to precisely analyse the discrimination power and smoothness of graph indices . these measures are based on the average and maximum , respectively , of the changes of graph index values when the underlying graph is modified by one elementary edit step of the graph edit distance . discrimination of graph structures by graph indices is also a crucial part of the texture analysis approach discussed here . thus , discrimination power and the related notions of high structure sensitivity and low abruptness matter also in the present context . however , unique identification of individual graphs is somewhat less important in texture analysis than when examining single graphs as in @xcite , as in texture analysis one is confronted with large collections of graphs associated with image pixels , and one is interested in separating these into a small number of classes representing regions . not only will each class contain numerous graphs , but also the spatial arrangement of the associated pixels is to be taken into account as an additional source of information , as segments are expected to be connected . as can be seen in @xcite , there are several ways in which image analysis can be linked to graph concepts . a large class of approaches is based on graphs in which the pixels of a digital image take the role of vertices , and the set of edges is based on neighbourhood relations , with @xmath2- and @xmath3-neighbourhoods as most popular choices in 2d , and similar constructions in 3d , see ( * ? ? ? * section 1.5.1 ) . to imprint actual image information on such a graph , one can furnish it with edge weights that are based on image contrasts . among others , the _ graph cut _ methods @xcite that have recently received much attention for applications such as image segmentation @xcite and correspondence problems @xcite make use of this concept . this setup is also central for the work presented here , see the more detailed account of the pixel graph and edge - weighted pixel graph of an image in section [ ssec - graphcons ] of the present paper . generalising the pixel - graph framework , the graph perspective allows to transfer image processing methods from the regular mesh underlying standard digital images to non - regular meshes that can be related to scanned surface data @xcite but arise also from standard images when considering non - local models @xcite that have recently received great attention in image enhancement . graph morphology , see e.g.@xcite , is one of these generalisations of image processing methods to non - regular meshes , but also variational and pde frameworks have been generalised in this way @xcite . we briefly mention that graphs can also be constructed , after suitable preprocessing , from vertices representing image regions , see ( * ? ? ? * section 1.5.2 ) , opening avenues to high - level semantic image interpretation by means of partition trees . comparison of hierarchies of semantically meaningful partitions can then be achieved e.g. using graph edit distance or related concepts @xcite . returning to the pixel - graph setup which we will also use in this work , see section [ ssec - graphcons ] , we point out a difference of our approach to those that represent the entire image in a single pixel graph . we focus here on subgraphs related to small image patches , thus generating large sets of graphs whose vertex sets , connectivity and/or edge weights encode local image information . to extract meaningful information from such collections , statistical methods such as entropy - based graph indices are particularly suited . in image analysis , the term _ texture _ refers to the small - scale structure of image regions , and as such it has been an object of intensive investigation since the beginnings of digital image analysis . for example , @xcite undertook approaches to define and analyse textures . [ [ complementarity - of - texture - and - shape . ] ] complementarity of texture and shape . + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + real - world scenes often consist of collections of distinct objects which in the process of imaging are mapped to regions in an image delineated by more or less sharp boundaries . while the geometric description of region boundaries is afforded by the concept of _ shape _ and typically involves large - scale structures , texture represents the appearance of the individual objects , either their surfaces if images in the case of reflection imaging ( such as photography of opaque objects ) , or their interior if transmission - based imaging modalities ( such as transmission microscopy , x - ray , magnetic resonance ) are being considered . texture is then expressed in the distribution of intensities and their short - scale correlations within a region . a frequently used mathematical formulation of this distinction is the _ cartoon - texture model _ that underlies many works on image restoration and enhancement , see e.g. @xcite . in this approach , ( space - continuous ) images are described as the sum of two functions : a _ cartoon _ component from the space @xmath4 of functions of bounded variation , and a _ texture _ component from a suitable sobolev space . in a refined version of this decomposition @xcite , noise is modelled as a third component assigned to a different function space . note that also in image synthesis ( computer graphics ) the complementarity of shape and texture is used : here , textures are understood as intensity maps that are mapped on the surfaces of geometrically described objects . the exact frontier between shape and texture information in a scene or image , however , is model - dependent . the intensity variation of a surface is partly caused by geometric details of that surface . with a coarse - scale modelling of shape , small - scale variations are included in the texture description , whereas with a refined modelling of shape , some of these variations become part of the shape information . for example , in the texture samples shown in figure [ fi - e3](a ) and ( b ) , a geometric description with sufficiently fine granularity could capture individual leaves or blossoms as shapes , whereas the large - scale viewpoint treats the entire ensemble of leaves or blossoms as texture . [ [ texture - models . ] ] texture models . + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + capturing texture is virtually never possible on the basis of a single pixel . only the simplest of all textures , homogeneous intensity , can be described by a single intensity . for all other textures , intensities within neighbourhoods of suitable size ( that differs from texture to texture ) need to be considered to detect and classify textures . moreover , there is a large variety of structures that can be constitutive of textures , ranging from periodic patterns in which the arrangement of intensity values follows strict geometric rules , via near - periodic and quasi - periodic structures to irregular patterns where just statistical properties of intensities within a neighbourhood are characteristic of the texture . the texture samples in figure [ fi - e3](a ) and ( b ) are located rather in the middle of the scale where both geometric relations and statistics of the intensities are characteristic of the texture ; near - periodic stripe patterns as in the later examples , figures [ fi - e - stripes ] and [ fi - zebra ] , are more geometrically dominated . with emphasis on different categories of textures within this continuum , numerous geometric and statistic approaches have been made over the decades to describe textures . for example , frequency - based models @xcite emphasise the periodic or quasi - periodic aspect of textures . statistics on intensities such as @xcite mark the opposite end of the scale , whereas models based on statistics of image derivative quantities like gradients @xcite or structure tensor entries @xcite attempt to combine statistical with geometrical information . a concept that differs significantly from both approaches has been proposed in @xcite where textures are described generatively via grammars . also fractals @xcite have been proposed as a means to describe , distinguish and classify textures . remember that a fractal is a geometric object , in fact a topological space , for which it is possible to determine , at least locally , a minkowski dimension ( or , almost identical , hausdorff dimension ) which differs from its topological dimension . assume that the fractal is embedded in a surrounding euclidean space , and it is compact . then it can be covered by a finite number of boxes , or balls , of prescribed size . when the size of the boxes or balls is sent to zero , the number of them which is needed to cover the structure grows with some power of the inverse box or ball size . the minkowski dimension of the fractal is essentially the exponent in this power law . the minkowski dimension of a fractal is often non - integer ( which is the reason for its name ) , however , a more precise definition is that minkowski and topological dimensions differ , which also includes cases like the peano curve whose minkowski dimension is an integer ( @xmath5 ) but still different from the topological dimension ( @xmath6 ) . see also @xcite for different concepts of fractal dimension . textured images can be associated with fractals by considering the image manifold , i.e. the function graph if the image is modelled as a function over the image plane , which is naturally embedded in a product space of image domain and the range of intensity values . for example , a planar grey - value image @xmath7 has the image manifold @xmath8 . the dimension of this structure can be considered as a fractal - based texture descriptor . this approach has been stated in @xcite where fractal dimension was put into relation with image roughness and the roughness of physical structures depicted in the image . many works followed this approach , particularly in the 1980s and beginning 1990s when fractals were under particularly intensive investigation in theoretical and applied mathematics . in @xcite several of these approaches are reviewed . an attempt to analyse fractal dimension concepts for texture analysis is found in @xcite . the concept has also been transferred to the analysis of 1d signals , see @xcite . during the last two decades the interest in fractal methods has somewhat reduced but research in the field remains ongoing as can be seen from more recent publications , see e.g. @xcite for signal analysis , @xcite for image analysis with application in material science . with regard to our analysis in section [ sec - tdana ] that leads to a relation between graph methods and fractals , it is worth mentioning that already @xcite linked graph and fractal methods in image analysis , albeit not considering texture but shape description . [ [ texture - segmentation . ] ] texture segmentation . + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + the task of texture segmentation , i.e. decomposing an image into several segments based on texture differences , has been studied for more than forty years , see @xcite . a great variety of different approaches to the problem have been proposed since then . many of these combine generic segmentation approaches , that could also be implemented for merely intensity - based segmentation , with sets of quantitative texture descriptors that are used as inputs to the segmentation . for example , @xcite are based on active contour or active region models for segmentation , whereas @xcite is an example of a clustering - based method . nevertheless , texture segmentation continues to challenge researchers ; in particular , improvements on the side of texture descriptors are still desirable . note that the task of texture segmentation involves a conflict : on one hand , textures can not be detected on single - pixel level , necessitating the inclusion of neighbourhoods in texture descriptor computation . on the other hand , the intended output of a segmentation is a unique assignment of each pixel to a segment , which means to fix the segment boundaries at pixel resolution . to allow sufficiently precise location of boundaries , texture descriptors should therefore not use larger patches than necessary to distinguish the textures present in an image . the content of this paper is centred around a set of texture descriptors that have been introduced in @xcite based on graph representations of local image structure . this model seems to be the first that exploited graph models in discrimination of textures . note that even texture segmentation approaches in literature that use graph cuts for the segmentation task use non - graph - based texture descriptors to bring the texture information into the graph - cut formulation , see e.g. @xcite . our texture segmentation approach that was already shortly demonstrated in @xcite integrates instead graph - based texture descriptors into a non - graph - based segmentation framework , compare section [ sec - gac ] . throughout the history of texture processing , quantitative texture descriptors have played an important role . assigning a tuple of numerical values to a texture provides an interface to established image processing algorithms that were originally designed to act on intensities , and thereby to devise modular frameworks for image processing tasks that involve texture information . following this modular approach , we will attack the texture segmentation task by combining a set of texture descriptors with a well - established image segmentation algorithm . in this section we will introduce the texture descriptors whereas the following section will be devoted to describing the segmentation method . given the variety of different textures that exist in natural images , it can not be expected that one single texture descriptor will be suitable to discriminate arbitrary textures . instead , it will be sensible to come up with a set of descriptors that complement each other well in distinguishing different kinds of textures . to keep the set of descriptors at a manageable size , the individual descriptors should nevertheless be able to discriminate substantial classes of textures . on the other hand , it will be useful both for theoretical analysis and for practical computation if the set of descriptors is not entirely disparate but based on some powerful common concept . in @xcite a family of texture descriptors was introduced based on the application of several graph indices to graphs representing local image information . in combining six sets of graphs derived from an image , whose computation is based on common principles , with a number of different but related graph indices , this family of descriptors is indeed built on a common concepts . the descriptors were evaluated in @xcite in a simple texture discrimination task , and turned out to yield results competitive with haralick features @xcite , a well - established concept in texture analysis . in this comparison , graph indices based on entropy measures stood out by their texture discrimination rate . in the following , we recall the construction of texture descriptors from @xcite , focussing on a subset of the descriptors discussed there the first step is the construction of graphs from image patches . in the second step , graph indices are computed from these graphs . a discrete grey - scale image is given as an array of real intensity values sampled at the nodes of a regular grid . the nodes are points @xmath9 in the plane where @xmath10 , @xmath11 . the spatial mesh sizes @xmath12 and @xmath13 are often assumed to be @xmath6 in image processing , which we will do also here for simplicity . denoting the intensity values by @xmath14 and assuming that @xmath15 , @xmath16 , the image is then described as the array @xmath17 . the nodes of the grid , thus the pixels of the image , can naturally be considered as vertices of a graph in which neighbouring pixels are connected by edges . we will call this graph the _ pixel graph _ @xmath18 of the image . two common choices for what pixels are considered as neighbours are based on @xmath2-neighbourhoods , in which pixel @xmath19 has the two horizontal neighbours @xmath20 and the two vertical neighbours @xmath21 , or @xmath3-neighbourhoods , in which also the four diagonal neighbours @xmath22 are included in the neighbourhood . whereas the @xmath2-neighbourhood setting leads to a somewhat simpler pixel graph ( particularly , it is planar ) , whereas @xmath3-neighbourhoods are better suited to capture the geometry of the underlying ( euclidean ) plane . in this work , we will mostly use @xmath3-neighbourhoods . see 1.5 ) for more variants of graphs assigned to images . we upgrade the pixel graph to an _ edge - weighted pixel graph _ @xmath23 by defining edge weights @xmath24 for neighbouring pixels @xmath25 via @xmath26 i.e. an @xmath27 sum of the spatial distance of grid nodes @xmath28 ( where @xmath29 denotes the euclidean norm ) , and the contrast @xmath30 of their corresponding intensity values , weighted by a positive _ contrast scale _ @xmath31 . this construction can of course be generalised by replacing the euclidean norm in the image plane , and the @xmath27 sum by other norms . with various settings for these norms , it has been used e.g. in @xcite to construct larger spatially adaptive neighbourhoods in images , so - called _ morphological amoebas . _ see also @xcite for a more detailed description of the amoeba framework in a graph - based terminology . all graphs that will enter the texture descriptor construction are derived from the pixel graph or the edge - weighted pixel graph of the image . first , given a pixel @xmath32 and a radius @xmath33 , we define the euclidean patch graph @xmath34 as the subgraph of @xmath23 which includes all nodes @xmath35 with euclidean distance @xmath36 . in this graph , image information is encoded solely in the edge weights . second , we define the adaptive patch graph @xmath37 as the subgraph of @xmath23 which includes all nodes @xmath35 for which @xmath23 contains a path from @xmath32 to @xmath35 with total weight less or equal @xmath38 . in the terminology of @xcite , the node set of @xmath37 is a morphological amoeba of amoeba radius @xmath38 around @xmath32 , which we will denote by @xmath39 . note that the graph @xmath37 encodes image information not only in its edge weights , but also in its node set @xmath39 . one obvious way to compute @xmath39 is by dijkstra s shortest path algorithm @xcite with @xmath32 as starting point . a natural by - product of this algorithm , which is not used in amoeba - based image filtering as in @xcite etc . , is the dijkstra search tree , which we denote as @xmath40 . this is the third candidate graph for our texture description . image information is encoded in this graph in three ways : in the edge weights , the node set , and the connectivity of the tree . dropping the edge weights from @xmath40 , we obtain an unweighted tree @xmath41 which still encodes image information in its node set and connectivity . finally , a dijkstra search tree @xmath42 and its unweighted counterpart @xmath43 can be obtained by applying dijkstra s shortest path algorithm within the euclidean patch graph @xmath34 . whereas @xmath42 encodes image information in the edge weights and connectivity , @xmath43 does so only in the connectivity . applying these procedures to all pixels @xmath44 of a discrete image @xmath45 , we have therefore six collections of graphs which represent different combinations of three cues to local image information ( edge weights , node sets , connectivity ) and can therefore be expected to be suitable for texture discrimination . in the following we will drop the arguments @xmath32 , @xmath38 and use simply @xmath46 etc . to refer to the collections of graphs . in order to turn the collections of graphs into quantitative texture descriptors suitable for texture analysis tasks , the realm of graph indices developed in quantitative graph theory lends itself as a powerful tool . in @xcite , a selection of graph indices was considered for this purpose , including on one hand distance - based graph indices ( the wiener index @xcite , the harary index @xcite and the balaban index @xcite ) and on the other hand entropy - based indices ( bonchev - trinajsti indices @xcite and dehmer entropies @xcite ) . the so - obtained set of @xmath47 texture descriptors was evaluated in @xcite with respect to their discrimination power and diversity . using nine textures from a database @xcite , texture discrimination power was quantified based on simple statistics ( mean value and standard deviation ) of the descriptor values within single - texture patches , calibrating thresholds for certain and uncertain discrimination of textures within the set of textures . diversity of descriptors was measured based on the overlap in the sets of texture pairs discriminated by different descriptors . despite the somewhat ad - hoc character of the threshold calibration , the study gives valuable hints for the selection of powerful subsets of the @xmath47 texture descriptors . among the descriptors being analysed , particularly the entropy - based descriptors ranked medium to high regarding discrimination power for the sample set of textures . for the present work , we focus therefore on three entropy measures which we will recall in the following , namely the dehmer entropies @xmath48 and @xmath49 as well as bonchev and trinajsti s mean information on distances @xmath50 . the latter is restricted by its construction to unweighted graphs , and is therefore used with the unweighted dijkstra trees @xmath51 and @xmath52 . the dehmer entropies can be combined with all six graph collections . in @xcite , the dehmer entropies on the patch graphs @xmath46 and @xmath53 achieved the highest rates of certain discrimination of textures , and outperformed the haralick features included in the study . some of the other descriptors based on dehmer entropies as well as the bonchev - trinajsti information measures achieved middle ranks , combining medium rates of certain discrimination with uncertain discrimination of almost all other texture pairs ; thereby , they were still comparable to haralick features and distance - based graph indices . the measures considered here are based on shannon s entropy @xcite @xmath54 that measures the information content of a discrete probability measure @xmath55 , @xmath56 , @xmath57 . ( note that for @xmath58 one has to set in @xmath59 by limit . ) following @xcite , a discrete probability measure can be assigned to an arbitrary nonnegative - valued function @xmath60 , an _ information functional _ , via @xmath61 an entropy measure on an arbitrary information functional @xmath62 is then obtained by applying to . introduced in @xcite and further investigated in @xcite , the _ mean information on distances _ is the entropy measure resulting from an information functional on the path lengths in a graph . let a graph @xmath63 with @xmath64 vertices @xmath65 be given , and let @xmath66 denote the length of a shortest path from @xmath67 to @xmath68 in @xmath63 ( unweighted , i.e. each edge counting @xmath6 ) . let @xmath69 be the diameter of @xmath63 . for each @xmath70 , let @xmath71 the mean information on distances then is the entropy measure based on the information functional @xmath72 , i.e.@xmath73 let us shortly mention that @xcite also introduces the _ mean information on realised distances _ @xmath74 , which we will not further consider here . as an entropy measure , @xmath74 can be derived from the information functional @xmath66 on the set of all vertex pairs @xmath75 , @xmath76 , of @xmath63 . as pointed out in @xcite , @xmath74 can be generalised straightforwardly to edge - weighted graphs by measuring distances @xmath66 with edge weights , but a similar generalisation of @xmath77 would be degenerated because in generic cases all edge - weighted distances in a graph will be distinct , leading to @xmath78 for all realised values @xmath79 . therefore we will use the mean information on distances @xmath77 only with the unweighted graphs @xmath52 and @xmath51 . the two entropy measures @xmath80 and @xmath81 for unweighted graphs @xmath63 were introduced in @xcite . their high discriminative power for large sets of graphs was impressively demonstrated in @xcite . both measures rely on information functionals on the vertex set @xmath82 of @xmath63 whose construction involves spheres @xmath83 of varying radius @xmath79 around @xmath67 . note that the sphere @xmath83 in @xmath63 is the set of vertices @xmath68 with @xmath84 . for @xmath48 the information functional @xmath85 on vertices @xmath67 of an unweighted graph @xmath63 is defined as @xcite @xmath86 where @xmath87 is the cardinality of the @xmath79-sphere around @xmath68 , with positive parameters @xmath88 . ( note that @xcite used a general exponential with base @xmath89 . for the purpose of the present paper , however , this additional parameter is easily eliminated by multiplying the coefficients @xmath90 with @xmath91 . ) for @xmath49 the information functional @xmath92 relies on the quantities @xmath93 i.e. @xmath94 is the sum of distances from @xmath67 to all points in its @xmath79-sphere . with similar parameters @xmath88 as before , one defines then @xmath95 as pointed out in @xcite , both information functionals , and thus the resulting entropy measures @xmath48 , @xmath49 , can be adapted to edge - weighted graphs @xmath63 via @xmath96 where distances @xmath66 are now measured using the edge weights , and @xmath97\to\mathbb{r}^+_0 $ ] is a decreasing function interpolating a reverse partial sum series of the original @xmath98 coefficients . further following @xcite , we focus on the specific choice @xmath99 ( an instance of the _ exponential weighting scheme _ from @xcite ) and obtain accordingly @xmath100 with a positive constant @xmath101 , which yields @xmath102 with a positive constant @xmath101 , as the final form of the information functionals for our construction of texture descriptors . we use for our experiments a well - established segmentation method based on partial differential equations ( pde ) . introduced in @xcite , _ geodesic active contours _ ( gac ) perform a contrast - based segmentation of a ( grey - scale ) input image @xmath62 . of course , other contrast - based segmentation methods could be chosen , including clustering @xcite or graph - cut methods @xcite . advantages or disadvantages of these methods in connection with graph - entropy - based texture descriptors may be studied in future work . for the time being we focus on the texture descriptors themselves , thus it matters to use just one well - established standard method . from the input image @xmath62 , a gaussian - smoothed image @xmath103 is computed , where @xmath104 is a gaussian kernel of standard deviation @xmath105 . from @xmath106 , one computes an edge map @xmath107 with the help of a decreasing and bounded function @xmath108 with @xmath109 . a popular choice for @xmath110 is @xmath111 which has originally been introduced by perona and malik @xcite as a diffusivity function for nonlinear diffusion filtering of images . herein , @xmath112 is a contrast parameter that acts as a threshold distinguishing high gradients ( indicating probable edges ) from small ones . in addition to the input image , gac require an initial contour @xmath113 ( a regular closed curve ) specified e.g. by user input . this contour is embedded into a _ level set function _ @xmath114 , i.e. @xmath114 is a sufficiently smooth function in the image plane whose zero level - set ( set of all points @xmath115 in the image plane for which @xmath116 ) is the given contour . for example , @xmath114 can be introduced as a signed distance function : @xmath117 is zero if @xmath115 lies on @xmath113 ; it is minus the distance of @xmath115 to @xmath113 if @xmath115 lies in the region enclosed by @xmath113 , and plus the same distance if @xmath115 lies in the outer region . one takes then @xmath114 as initial condition at time @xmath118 for the parabolic pde @xmath119 for a time - dependent level - set function @xmath120 . at each time @xmath121 , an evolved contour can be extracted from @xmath122 as zero level - set . for suitable input images and initialisations and with appropriate parameters , the contours lock in at a steady state that provides a contrast - based segmentation . to understand equation one can compare it to the curvature motion equation @xmath123 that would evolve all level curves of @xmath124 by an inward movement proportional to their curvature . in , this inward movement of level curves is modulated by the edge map @xmath107 , which slows down the curve displacement at high - contrast locations , such that contours stick there . the name _ geodesic active contours _ is due to the fact that the contour evolution associated to can be understood as gradient descent for the curve length of the contour in an image - adaptive metric ( a riemannian metric whose metric tensor is @xmath107 times the unit matrix ) , thus yielding a final contour that is a geodesic with respect to this metric . in its pure form , geodesic active contours require the initial contour ( at least most of it ) to be placed outside the object to be segmented . in some situations , however , it is easier to specify an initial contour inside an object , particularly if the intensities within the object are fairly homogeneous but many spurious edges irritating the segmentation exist in the background region . moreover , despite being able to handle also topology changes such as a splitting from one to several level curves encircling distinct objects to some extent , it has limitations when the topology of the segmentation becomes too complex . as a remedy to both difficulties , one can modify by adding a _ force term _ @xmath125 to its right - hand side . adding a force term was proposed first in @xcite ( by the name of _ balloon force _ ) whereas the specific form of the force term weighted with @xmath110 was proposed in @xcite . depending on the sign of @xmath126 , this force exercises an inward ( @xmath127 ) or outward ( @xmath128 ) pressure on the contour , which ( i ) speeds up the curve evolution , ( ii ) supports the handling of complex segmentation topologies , and ( iii ) enables for @xmath128 also segmentation of objects from initial contours placed inside . the modified gac evolution with force term , @xmath129 will be our segmentation method when performing texture segmentation based on only one quantitative texture descriptor . in this case , the texture descriptor will be used as input image @xmath62 from which the edge map @xmath110 is computed . it is straightforward to extend the gac method , including its modified version with force term to multi - channel input images @xmath130 where each location @xmath115 in the image plane is assigned an @xmath131-tuple @xmath132 of intensities . a common case , with @xmath133 , are rgb colour images . in fact , equations and incur almost no change as even for multi - channel input images , one computes the evolution of a simple real - valued level - set function @xmath124 . what is changed is the computation of the edge map @xmath110 : instead of the gradient norm @xmath134 one uses the frobenius norm @xmath135 of the jacobian @xmath136 where @xmath137 is the gaussian - smoothed input image , @xmath138 with @xmath139 , yielding @xmath140 as edge map . equation with this edge map will be our segmentation method when performing texture segmentation with multiple texture descriptors . the input image @xmath130 will have the individual texture descriptors as channels . to weight the influence of texture descriptors , the channels may be multiplied by scalar factors . for numerical computation we rewrite pde as @xmath141 ( where we have omitted the argument of @xmath110 which is a fixed input function to the pde anyway ) . following established practice , we use then an explicit ( euler forward ) numerical scheme where the right - hand side is spatially discretised as follows . the first term , @xmath142 , is discretised using central differences . for the second term , @xmath143 , an upwind discretisation @xcite is used in which the upwind direction for @xmath124 is determined based on the central - difference approximations of @xmath144 . the third term , @xmath145 , is discretised with an upwind discretisation , too . here , the upwind direction depends on the components of @xmath146 and the sign of @xmath126 . although a detailed stability analysis for this widely used type of explicit scheme for the gac equation seems to be missing , the scheme works for time step sizes @xmath147 up to ca . @xmath148 ( for spatial mesh sizes of @xmath149 ) for @xmath150 , which needs to be reduced somewhat for non - zero @xmath126 . in our experiments in section [ sec - segex ] we use consistently @xmath151 . for the level - set function @xmath124 , we use the signed distance function of the initial contour as initialisation . since during the evolution the shape of the level - set function changes , creating steeper ascents in some regions but flattening slopes elsewhere , we re - initialise @xmath124 to the signed distance function of its current zero level set every @xmath152 iterations . in this section , we present experiments on two synthetic and one real - world test image that demonstrate that graph - entropy - based texture descriptors can be used for texture - based segmentation . an experiment similar to our second synthetic example was already presented in @xcite . 0.001 ( 1000 , 238 ) ( 127 , 0 ) pixels . * ( b ) * texture patch _ leaves _ , same size . * ( c ) * test image composed from ( a ) and ( b ) , @xmath153 pixels . both texture patches are converted to greyscale , downscaled and clipped from the _ vistex _ database @xcite . 1995 massachusetts institute of technology . developed by rosalind picard , chris graczyk , steve mann , josh wachman , len picard , and lee campbell at the media laboratory , mit , cambridge , massachusetts . under general permission for scholarly use . , title="fig : " ] ( 128 , 10 ) ( 381 , 0 ) pixels . * ( b ) * texture patch _ leaves _ , same size . * ( c ) * test image composed from ( a ) and ( b ) , @xmath153 pixels . both texture patches are converted to greyscale , downscaled and clipped from the _ vistex _ database @xcite . 1995 massachusetts institute of technology . developed by rosalind picard , chris graczyk , steve mann , josh wachman , len picard , and lee campbell at the media laboratory , mit , cambridge , massachusetts . under general permission for scholarly use . , title="fig : " ] ( 382 , 10 ) ( 635 , 0 ) pixels . * ( b ) * texture patch _ leaves _ , same size . * ( c ) * test image composed from ( a ) and ( b ) , @xmath153 pixels . both texture patches are converted to greyscale , downscaled and clipped from the _ vistex _ database @xcite . 1995 massachusetts institute of technology . developed by rosalind picard , chris graczyk , steve mann , josh wachman , len picard , and lee campbell at the media laboratory , mit , cambridge , massachusetts . under general permission for scholarly use . , title="fig : " ] ( 636 , 10 ) in our first example we use a synthetic image , shown in figure [ fi - e3](c ) , which is composed from two textures , see figure [ fi - e3](a ) an ( b ) , with a simple shape ( the letter ` e ' ) switching between the two . note that the two textures were also among the nine textures studied in @xcite for the texture discrimination task . with its use of real - world textures , this synthetic example mimicks a realistic segmentation task . its synthetic construction warrants at the same time a ground truth to compare segmentation results with . 0.001 ( 1000 , 492 ) ( 0 , 254)(c ) ( values rescaled to @xmath154 $ ] ) . patch radii were fixed to @xmath155 , contrast scale to @xmath156 , weighting parameter to @xmath157 . * top row , left to right : * * ( a ) * @xmath158 . * ( b ) * @xmath159 . * ( c ) * @xmath160 . * ( d ) * @xmath161 . * bottom row , left to right : * * ( e ) * @xmath162 . * ( f ) * @xmath163 . * ( g ) * @xmath164 . * ( h ) * @xmath165 . , title="fig : " ] ( 1 , 264 ) ( 254 , 254)(c ) ( values rescaled to @xmath154 $ ] ) . patch radii were fixed to @xmath155 , contrast scale to @xmath156 , weighting parameter to @xmath157 . * top row , left to right : * * ( a ) * @xmath158 . * ( b ) * @xmath159 . * ( c ) * @xmath160 . * ( d ) * @xmath161 . * bottom row , left to right : * * ( e ) * @xmath162 . * ( f ) * @xmath163 . * ( g ) * @xmath164 . * ( h ) * @xmath165 . , title="fig : " ] ( 255 , 264 ) ( 508 , 254)(c ) ( values rescaled to @xmath154 $ ] ) . patch radii were fixed to @xmath155 , contrast scale to @xmath156 , weighting parameter to @xmath157 . * top row , left to right : * * ( a ) * @xmath158 . * ( b ) * @xmath159 . * ( c ) * @xmath160 . * ( d ) * @xmath161 . * bottom row , left to right : * * ( e ) * @xmath162 . * ( f ) * @xmath163 . * ( g ) * @xmath164 . * ( h ) * @xmath165 . , title="fig : " ] ( 509 , 264 ) ( 762 , 254)(c ) ( values rescaled to @xmath154 $ ] ) . patch radii were fixed to @xmath155 , contrast scale to @xmath156 , weighting parameter to @xmath157 . * top row , left to right : * * ( a ) * @xmath158 . * ( b ) * @xmath159 . * ( c ) * @xmath160 . * ( d ) * @xmath161 . * bottom row , left to right : * * ( e ) * @xmath162 . * ( f ) * @xmath163 . * ( g ) * @xmath164 . * ( h ) * @xmath165 . , title="fig : " ] ( 763 , 264 ) ( 0 , 0)(c ) ( values rescaled to @xmath154 $ ] ) . patch radii were fixed to @xmath155 , contrast scale to @xmath156 , weighting parameter to @xmath157 . * top row , left to right : * * ( a ) * @xmath158 . * ( b ) * @xmath159 . * ( c ) * @xmath160 . * ( d ) * @xmath161 . * bottom row , left to right : * * ( e ) * @xmath162 . * ( f ) * @xmath163 . * ( g ) * @xmath164 . * ( h ) * @xmath165 . , title="fig : " ] ( 1 , 10 ) ( 254 , 0)(c ) ( values rescaled to @xmath154 $ ] ) . patch radii were fixed to @xmath155 , contrast scale to @xmath156 , weighting parameter to @xmath157 . * top row , left to right : * * ( a ) * @xmath158 . * ( b ) * @xmath159 . * ( c ) * @xmath160 . * ( d ) * @xmath161 . * bottom row , left to right : * * ( e ) * @xmath162 . * ( f ) * @xmath163 . * ( g ) * @xmath164 . * ( h ) * @xmath165 . , title="fig : " ] ( 255 , 10 ) ( 508 , 0)(c ) ( values rescaled to @xmath154 $ ] ) . patch radii were fixed to @xmath155 , contrast scale to @xmath156 , weighting parameter to @xmath157 . * top row , left to right : * * ( a ) * @xmath158 . * ( b ) * @xmath159 . * ( c ) * @xmath160 . * ( d ) * @xmath161 . * bottom row , left to right : * * ( e ) * @xmath162 . * ( f ) * @xmath163 . * ( g ) * @xmath164 . * ( h ) * @xmath165 . , title="fig : " ] ( 509 , 10 ) ( 762 , 0)(c ) ( values rescaled to @xmath154 $ ] ) . patch radii were fixed to @xmath155 , contrast scale to @xmath156 , weighting parameter to @xmath157 . * top row , left to right : * * ( a ) * @xmath158 . * ( b ) * @xmath159 . * ( c ) * @xmath160 . * ( d ) * @xmath161 . * bottom row , left to right : * * ( e ) * @xmath162 . * ( f ) * @xmath163 . * ( g ) * @xmath164 . * ( h ) * @xmath165 . , title="fig : " ] ( 763 , 10 ) figure [ fi - e3-gi ] shows the results of eight graph - entropy - based texture descriptors for the test image . in particular , the combination of the dehmer entropy @xmath48 with all six graph variants from section [ ssec - graphcons ] is shown as well as @xmath49 on the weighted dijkstra trees in non - adaptive and adaptive patches . patch radii were fixed to @xmath155 for both non - adaptive and adaptive patches , whereas the contrast scale was chosen as @xmath156 . these parameter settings have already been used in @xcite ; they are based on values that work across various test images in the context of morphological amoeba image filtering . further investigation of variation of these parameters is left for future work . visual inspection of figure [ fi - e3-gi ] indicates that for this specific textured image , the entropy measure @xmath48 separates the two textures well in combination in particular with the weighted dijkstra tree settings , in both adaptive and non - adaptive patches , see frames ( b ) and ( f ) . the other @xmath48 results in frames ( c ) , ( e ) and ( g ) show insufficient contrast along some parts of the contour of the letter ` e ' . the index @xmath166 in frame ( a ) , which was identified in @xcite as a descriptor with high texture discrimination power , does not distinguish these two textures clearly but creates massive over - segmentation within each of them . in a sense , this over - segmentation is the downside of the high texture discrimination power of the descriptor . note , however , that also other @xmath53-based descriptors tend to this kind of over - segmentation . regarding the @xmath49 index , figure [ fi - e3-gi ] ( d ) and ( h ) , there is a huge difference between the adaptive and non - adaptive patch setting . distinction of the two textures is much better when using non - adaptive patches . 0.001 ( 1000 , 238 ) ( 0 , 0)(c ) . the edge map is computed from the graph - entropy - based texture descriptor @xmath163 from figure [ fi - e3-gi](f ) using pre - smoothing with @xmath167 , perona - malik edge - stopping function with @xmath168 , with expansion force @xmath169 . * left to right : * * ( a ) * initial contour ( @xmath118 ) . * ( b ) * @xmath170 . * ( c ) * @xmath171 . * ( d ) * @xmath172 ( steady state ) . , title="fig : " ] ( 1 , 10 ) ( 254 , 0)(c ) . the edge map is computed from the graph - entropy - based texture descriptor @xmath163 from figure [ fi - e3-gi](f ) using pre - smoothing with @xmath167 , perona - malik edge - stopping function with @xmath168 , with expansion force @xmath169 . * left to right : * * ( a ) * initial contour ( @xmath118 ) . * ( b ) * @xmath170 . * ( c ) * @xmath171 . * ( d ) * @xmath172 ( steady state ) . , title="fig : " ] ( 255 , 10 ) ( 508 , 0)(c ) . the edge map is computed from the graph - entropy - based texture descriptor @xmath163 from figure [ fi - e3-gi](f ) using pre - smoothing with @xmath167 , perona - malik edge - stopping function with @xmath168 , with expansion force @xmath169 . * left to right : * * ( a ) * initial contour ( @xmath118 ) . * ( b ) * @xmath170 . * ( c ) * @xmath171 . * ( d ) * @xmath172 ( steady state ) . , title="fig : " ] ( 509 , 10 ) ( 762 , 0)(c ) . the edge map is computed from the graph - entropy - based texture descriptor @xmath163 from figure [ fi - e3-gi](f ) using pre - smoothing with @xmath167 , perona - malik edge - stopping function with @xmath168 , with expansion force @xmath169 . * left to right : * * ( a ) * initial contour ( @xmath118 ) . * ( b ) * @xmath170 . * ( c ) * @xmath171 . * ( d ) * @xmath172 ( steady state ) . , title="fig : " ] ( 763 , 10 ) finally , we show in figure [ fi - e3-gac ] geodesic active contour segmentation of the test image with the descriptor @xmath163 . we start from an initial contour inside the ` e ' shape , see figure [ fi - e3-gac](a ) , and use an expansion force ( @xmath169 ) to drive the contour evolution in an outward direction . frames ( b ) and ( c ) show two intermediary stages of the evolution , where it is evident that the contour starts to align with the boundary between the two textures . frame ( d ) shows the steady state reached after @xmath173 iterations ( @xmath172 ) . here , the overall shape of the letter ` e ' is reasonably approximated , with deviations coming from small - scale texture details . precision of the segmentation could be increased slightly by combining more than one texture descriptor . we do not follow this direction at this point . 0.001 ( 1000 , 492 ) ( 0 , 254 ) pixels ) showing a stripe - textured shape in front of a noise background . * ( b d ) * texture descriptors based on graph entropies applied in adaptive patches , @xmath155 , @xmath156 , @xmath157 ; values rescaled to @xmath154 $ ] . * ( b ) * @xmath162 . * ( c ) * @xmath163 . * ( d ) * @xmath164 . * bottom row : * geodesic active contour segmentation of ( a ) using the texture descriptor ( @xmath48 on @xmath174 ) from ( b ) , same parameters as in figure [ fi - e3-gi ] except for @xmath175 . * left to right : * * ( e ) * initial contour ( @xmath118 ) . * ( f ) * @xmath176 . * ( g ) * @xmath177 . * ( h ) * @xmath178 ( steady state ) . , title="fig : " ] ( 1 , 264 ) ( 254 , 254 ) pixels ) showing a stripe - textured shape in front of a noise background . * ( b d ) * texture descriptors based on graph entropies applied in adaptive patches , @xmath155 , @xmath156 , @xmath157 ; values rescaled to @xmath154 $ ] . * ( b ) * @xmath162 . * ( c ) * @xmath163 . * ( d ) * @xmath164 . * bottom row : * geodesic active contour segmentation of ( a ) using the texture descriptor ( @xmath48 on @xmath174 ) from ( b ) , same parameters as in figure [ fi - e3-gi ] except for @xmath175 . * left to right : * * ( e ) * initial contour ( @xmath118 ) . * ( f ) * @xmath176 . * ( g ) * @xmath177 . * ( h ) * @xmath178 ( steady state ) . , title="fig : " ] ( 255 , 264 ) ( 508 , 254 ) pixels ) showing a stripe - textured shape in front of a noise background . * ( b d ) * texture descriptors based on graph entropies applied in adaptive patches , @xmath155 , @xmath156 , @xmath157 ; values rescaled to @xmath154 $ ] . * ( b ) * @xmath162 . * ( c ) * @xmath163 . * ( d ) * @xmath164 . * bottom row : * geodesic active contour segmentation of ( a ) using the texture descriptor ( @xmath48 on @xmath174 ) from ( b ) , same parameters as in figure [ fi - e3-gi ] except for @xmath175 . * left to right : * * ( e ) * initial contour ( @xmath118 ) . * ( f ) * @xmath176 . * ( g ) * @xmath177 . * ( h ) * @xmath178 ( steady state ) . , title="fig : " ] ( 509 , 264 ) ( 762 , 254 ) pixels ) showing a stripe - textured shape in front of a noise background . * ( b d ) * texture descriptors based on graph entropies applied in adaptive patches , @xmath155 , @xmath156 , @xmath157 ; values rescaled to @xmath154 $ ] . * ( b ) * @xmath162 . * ( c ) * @xmath163 . * ( d ) * @xmath164 . * bottom row : * geodesic active contour segmentation of ( a ) using the texture descriptor ( @xmath48 on @xmath174 ) from ( b ) , same parameters as in figure [ fi - e3-gi ] except for @xmath175 . * left to right : * * ( e ) * initial contour ( @xmath118 ) . * ( f ) * @xmath176 . * ( g ) * @xmath177 . * ( h ) * @xmath178 ( steady state ) . , title="fig : " ] ( 763 , 264 ) ( 0 , 0 ) pixels ) showing a stripe - textured shape in front of a noise background . * ( b d ) * texture descriptors based on graph entropies applied in adaptive patches , @xmath155 , @xmath156 , @xmath157 ; values rescaled to @xmath154 $ ] . * ( b ) * @xmath162 . * ( c ) * @xmath163 . * ( d ) * @xmath164 . * bottom row : * geodesic active contour segmentation of ( a ) using the texture descriptor ( @xmath48 on @xmath174 ) from ( b ) , same parameters as in figure [ fi - e3-gi ] except for @xmath175 . * left to right : * * ( e ) * initial contour ( @xmath118 ) . * ( f ) * @xmath176 . * ( g ) * @xmath177 . * ( h ) * @xmath178 ( steady state ) . , title="fig : " ] ( 1 , 10 ) ( 254 , 0 ) pixels ) showing a stripe - textured shape in front of a noise background . * ( b d ) * texture descriptors based on graph entropies applied in adaptive patches , @xmath155 , @xmath156 , @xmath157 ; values rescaled to @xmath154 $ ] . * ( b ) * @xmath162 . * ( c ) * @xmath163 . * ( d ) * @xmath164 . * bottom row : * geodesic active contour segmentation of ( a ) using the texture descriptor ( @xmath48 on @xmath174 ) from ( b ) , same parameters as in figure [ fi - e3-gi ] except for @xmath175 . * left to right : * * ( e ) * initial contour ( @xmath118 ) . * ( f ) * @xmath176 . * ( g ) * @xmath177 . * ( h ) * @xmath178 ( steady state ) . , title="fig : " ] ( 255 , 10 ) ( 508 , 0 ) pixels ) showing a stripe - textured shape in front of a noise background . * ( b d ) * texture descriptors based on graph entropies applied in adaptive patches , @xmath155 , @xmath156 , @xmath157 ; values rescaled to @xmath154 $ ] . * ( b ) * @xmath162 . * ( c ) * @xmath163 . * ( d ) * @xmath164 . * bottom row : * geodesic active contour segmentation of ( a ) using the texture descriptor ( @xmath48 on @xmath174 ) from ( b ) , same parameters as in figure [ fi - e3-gi ] except for @xmath175 . * left to right : * * ( e ) * initial contour ( @xmath118 ) . * ( f ) * @xmath176 . * ( g ) * @xmath177 . * ( h ) * @xmath178 ( steady state ) . , title="fig : " ] ( 509 , 10 ) ( 762 , 0 ) pixels ) showing a stripe - textured shape in front of a noise background . * ( b d ) * texture descriptors based on graph entropies applied in adaptive patches , @xmath155 , @xmath156 , @xmath157 ; values rescaled to @xmath154 $ ] . * ( b ) * @xmath162 . * ( c ) * @xmath163 . * ( d ) * @xmath164 . * bottom row : * geodesic active contour segmentation of ( a ) using the texture descriptor ( @xmath48 on @xmath174 ) from ( b ) , same parameters as in figure [ fi - e3-gi ] except for @xmath175 . * left to right : * * ( e ) * initial contour ( @xmath118 ) . * ( f ) * @xmath176 . * ( g ) * @xmath177 . * ( h ) * @xmath178 ( steady state ) . , title="fig : " ] ( 763 , 10 ) in our second experiment , figure [ fi - e - stripes ] , we use again a synthetic test image where foreground and background segments are defined using the ` e ' letter shape such that again the desired segmentation result is known as a ground truth . also in this image we combine two realistic textures which can be seen as a simplified version of the foreground and background textures of the real - world test image , figure [ fi - zebra](a ) , used in the next section . this time , the foreground is filled with a stripe pattern whereas the background is noise with uniform distribution in the intensity range @xmath154 $ ] , see figure [ fi - e - stripes](a ) . in frames ( b)(d ) of figure [ fi - e - stripes ] we show the texture descriptors based on @xmath48 with the three graph settings in adaptive patches , using again @xmath155 and @xmath156 . the descriptor @xmath179 that was used for the segmentation in section [ ssec - segex-1 ] visually does not distinguish foreground from background satisfactorily here , whereas @xmath180 that provided no clear distinction of the two textures in section [ ssec - segex-1 ] clearly stands out here . this underlines the necessity of considering multiple descriptors which complement each other in distinguishing textures . our gac segmentation of the test image shown in frames ( e)(h ) is based on the texture descriptor @xmath180 and quickly converges to a fairly good approximation of the segment boundary . 0.001 ( 1000 , 758 ) ( 0 , 516 ) pixels ) , converted to greyscale . original image from ` http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/file:grants_zebra.jpg ` , author ruby 1x2 , released to public domain . * ( b ) * texture descriptor @xmath158 , @xmath181 , @xmath156 , @xmath157 . * ( c ) * texture descriptor @xmath159 , parameters as in ( b ) . * middle row , left to right : * * ( d ) * texture descriptor @xmath161 , parameters as in ( b ) . * ( e ) * texture descriptor @xmath182 , parameters as in ( b ) . * ( f ) * initial contour for geodesic active contour segmentation ( @xmath118 ) . * bottom row , left to right : * * ( g ) * geodesic active contours with edge - stopping function computed from the texture descriptors @xmath161 shown in ( d ) and @xmath182 shown in ( e ) with @xmath183 , perona - malik edge - stopping function , @xmath184 , @xmath185 . * ( h ) * same as ( g ) but @xmath186 . * ( i ) * same as ( g ) but @xmath187 ( steady state ) . , title="fig : " ] ( 1 , 526 ) ( 339 , 516 ) pixels ) , converted to greyscale . original image from ` http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/file:grants_zebra.jpg ` , author ruby 1x2 , released to public domain . * ( b ) * texture descriptor @xmath158 , @xmath181 , @xmath156 , @xmath157 . * ( c ) * texture descriptor @xmath159 , parameters as in ( b ) . * middle row , left to right : * * ( d ) * texture descriptor @xmath161 , parameters as in ( b ) . * ( e ) * texture descriptor @xmath182 , parameters as in ( b ) . * ( f ) * initial contour for geodesic active contour segmentation ( @xmath118 ) . * bottom row , left to right : * * ( g ) * geodesic active contours with edge - stopping function computed from the texture descriptors @xmath161 shown in ( d ) and @xmath182 shown in ( e ) with @xmath183 , perona - malik edge - stopping function , @xmath184 , @xmath185 . * ( h ) * same as ( g ) but @xmath186 . * ( i ) * same as ( g ) but @xmath187 ( steady state ) . , title="fig : " ] ( 340 , 526 ) ( 678 , 516 ) pixels ) , converted to greyscale . original image from ` http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/file:grants_zebra.jpg ` , author ruby 1x2 , released to public domain . * ( b ) * texture descriptor @xmath158 , @xmath181 , @xmath156 , @xmath157 . * ( c ) * texture descriptor @xmath159 , parameters as in ( b ) . * middle row , left to right : * * ( d ) * texture descriptor @xmath161 , parameters as in ( b ) . * ( e ) * texture descriptor @xmath182 , parameters as in ( b ) . * ( f ) * initial contour for geodesic active contour segmentation ( @xmath118 ) . * bottom row , left to right : * * ( g ) * geodesic active contours with edge - stopping function computed from the texture descriptors @xmath161 shown in ( d ) and @xmath182 shown in ( e ) with @xmath183 , perona - malik edge - stopping function , @xmath184 , @xmath185 . * ( h ) * same as ( g ) but @xmath186 . * ( i ) * same as ( g ) but @xmath187 ( steady state ) . , title="fig : " ] ( 680 , 526 ) ( 0 , 258 ) pixels ) , converted to greyscale . original image from ` http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/file:grants_zebra.jpg ` , author ruby 1x2 , released to public domain . * ( b ) * texture descriptor @xmath158 , @xmath181 , @xmath156 , @xmath157 . * ( c ) * texture descriptor @xmath159 , parameters as in ( b ) . * middle row , left to right : * * ( d ) * texture descriptor @xmath161 , parameters as in ( b ) . * ( e ) * texture descriptor @xmath182 , parameters as in ( b ) . * ( f ) * initial contour for geodesic active contour segmentation ( @xmath118 ) . * bottom row , left to right : * * ( g ) * geodesic active contours with edge - stopping function computed from the texture descriptors @xmath161 shown in ( d ) and @xmath182 shown in ( e ) with @xmath183 , perona - malik edge - stopping function , @xmath184 , @xmath185 . * ( h ) * same as ( g ) but @xmath186 . * ( i ) * same as ( g ) but @xmath187 ( steady state ) . , title="fig : " ] ( 1 , 268 ) ( 339 , 258 ) pixels ) , converted to greyscale . original image from ` http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/file:grants_zebra.jpg ` , author ruby 1x2 , released to public domain . * ( b ) * texture descriptor @xmath158 , @xmath181 , @xmath156 , @xmath157 . * ( c ) * texture descriptor @xmath159 , parameters as in ( b ) . * middle row , left to right : * * ( d ) * texture descriptor @xmath161 , parameters as in ( b ) . * ( e ) * texture descriptor @xmath182 , parameters as in ( b ) . * ( f ) * initial contour for geodesic active contour segmentation ( @xmath118 ) . * bottom row , left to right : * * ( g ) * geodesic active contours with edge - stopping function computed from the texture descriptors @xmath161 shown in ( d ) and @xmath182 shown in ( e ) with @xmath183 , perona - malik edge - stopping function , @xmath184 , @xmath185 . * ( h ) * same as ( g ) but @xmath186 . * ( i ) * same as ( g ) but @xmath187 ( steady state ) . , title="fig : " ] ( 340 , 268 ) ( 678 , 258 ) pixels ) , converted to greyscale . original image from ` http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/file:grants_zebra.jpg ` , author ruby 1x2 , released to public domain . * ( b ) * texture descriptor @xmath158 , @xmath181 , @xmath156 , @xmath157 . * ( c ) * texture descriptor @xmath159 , parameters as in ( b ) . * middle row , left to right : * * ( d ) * texture descriptor @xmath161 , parameters as in ( b ) . * ( e ) * texture descriptor @xmath182 , parameters as in ( b ) . * ( f ) * initial contour for geodesic active contour segmentation ( @xmath118 ) . * bottom row , left to right : * * ( g ) * geodesic active contours with edge - stopping function computed from the texture descriptors @xmath161 shown in ( d ) and @xmath182 shown in ( e ) with @xmath183 , perona - malik edge - stopping function , @xmath184 , @xmath185 . * ( h ) * same as ( g ) but @xmath186 . * ( i ) * same as ( g ) but @xmath187 ( steady state ) . , title="fig : " ] ( 680 , 268 ) ( 0 , 0 ) pixels ) , converted to greyscale . original image from ` http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/file:grants_zebra.jpg ` , author ruby 1x2 , released to public domain . * ( b ) * texture descriptor @xmath158 , @xmath181 , @xmath156 , @xmath157 . * ( c ) * texture descriptor @xmath159 , parameters as in ( b ) . * middle row , left to right : * * ( d ) * texture descriptor @xmath161 , parameters as in ( b ) . * ( e ) * texture descriptor @xmath182 , parameters as in ( b ) . * ( f ) * initial contour for geodesic active contour segmentation ( @xmath118 ) . * bottom row , left to right : * * ( g ) * geodesic active contours with edge - stopping function computed from the texture descriptors @xmath161 shown in ( d ) and @xmath182 shown in ( e ) with @xmath183 , perona - malik edge - stopping function , @xmath184 , @xmath185 . * ( h ) * same as ( g ) but @xmath186 . * ( i ) * same as ( g ) but @xmath187 ( steady state ) . , title="fig : " ] ( 1 , 10 ) ( 339 , 0 ) pixels ) , converted to greyscale . original image from ` http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/file:grants_zebra.jpg ` , author ruby 1x2 , released to public domain . * ( b ) * texture descriptor @xmath158 , @xmath181 , @xmath156 , @xmath157 . * ( c ) * texture descriptor @xmath159 , parameters as in ( b ) . * middle row , left to right : * * ( d ) * texture descriptor @xmath161 , parameters as in ( b ) . * ( e ) * texture descriptor @xmath182 , parameters as in ( b ) . * ( f ) * initial contour for geodesic active contour segmentation ( @xmath118 ) . * bottom row , left to right : * * ( g ) * geodesic active contours with edge - stopping function computed from the texture descriptors @xmath161 shown in ( d ) and @xmath182 shown in ( e ) with @xmath183 , perona - malik edge - stopping function , @xmath184 , @xmath185 . * ( h ) * same as ( g ) but @xmath186 . * ( i ) * same as ( g ) but @xmath187 ( steady state ) . , title="fig : " ] ( 340 , 10 ) ( 678 , 0 ) pixels ) , converted to greyscale . original image from ` http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/file:grants_zebra.jpg ` , author ruby 1x2 , released to public domain . * ( b ) * texture descriptor @xmath158 , @xmath181 , @xmath156 , @xmath157 . * ( c ) * texture descriptor @xmath159 , parameters as in ( b ) . * middle row , left to right : * * ( d ) * texture descriptor @xmath161 , parameters as in ( b ) . * ( e ) * texture descriptor @xmath182 , parameters as in ( b ) . * ( f ) * initial contour for geodesic active contour segmentation ( @xmath118 ) . * bottom row , left to right : * * ( g ) * geodesic active contours with edge - stopping function computed from the texture descriptors @xmath161 shown in ( d ) and @xmath182 shown in ( e ) with @xmath183 , perona - malik edge - stopping function , @xmath184 , @xmath185 . * ( h ) * same as ( g ) but @xmath186 . * ( i ) * same as ( g ) but @xmath187 ( steady state ) . , title="fig : " ] ( 680 , 10 ) in our last experiment , figure [ fi - zebra ] , we consider a real - world image showing a zebra , see frame ( a ) . in a sense , this experiment resembles the synthetic case from section [ ssec - segex-2 ] because again a foreground dominated by a clear stripe pattern is to be distinguished from a background filled with small - scale detail . in frames ( b)(e ) four texture descriptors are shown . with regard to the higher resolution of the test image , the patch radius has been chosen slightly larger than in the previous examples , @xmath181 , whereas @xmath156 was retained . as can be seen in frame ( b ) , @xmath158 shows the same kind of over - segmentation behaviour as observed in section [ ssec - segex-1 ] , however , it also separates a large part of the zebra shape well from the background . the second descriptor , @xmath159 in frame ( c ) , appears unsuitable here because it does not yield sufficiently similar values within the black and white stripes to recognise these as a common texture . in contrast , @xmath161 and @xmath182 in figure [ fi - zebra](d ) and ( e ) , respectively , achieve this largely . our gac segmentation in frames ( f)(i ) uses a larger gaussian kernel for pre - smoothing than before , @xmath183 , to flatten out small - scale inhomogeneities in the texture descriptors , and combines the two descriptors from ( d ) and ( e ) . with these data , a large part of the zebra including the head and front part of the torso is segmented in the final steady state . not included are the rear part and the forelegs . note that in the foreleg part the stripes are much thinner than in the segmented region , apparently preventing the recognition of this texture as a continuation of the one from the head and front torso . in contrast , the rear part of the torso shown very thick stripes which under the patch size chosen decompose into separate ( homogeneous ) textures for black and white stripes , as is also visible in the texture descriptors ( d ) and ( e ) themselves . further investigation of parameter variations and inclusion of more texture descriptors might improve this preliminary result in the future . in this section , we undertake an attempt to analyse the texture descriptors based on the entropy measures @xmath48 and @xmath49 , focussing on the question what properties of textures are actually encoded in their information functionals @xmath85 and @xmath92 . part of this analysis is on a heuristic level at the present stage of research , and future work will have to be invested to add precision to these arguments . this applies to the limiting procedure in section [ ssec - graphfrac ] as well as to the concept of local fractal dimension arising in section [ ssec - fracdim ] . we believe , however , that even in its present shape , the analysis provided in the following gives valuable intuition about the principles underlying our texture descriptors . for the purpose of our analysis , we generalise the information functional @xmath85 from directly to edge - weighted graphs by replacing the series @xmath188 of cardinalities from with the monotone increasing function @xmath189 , @xmath190 that measures volumes of spheres with arbitrary radius . assuming the exponential weighting scheme and large @xmath191 this yields @xmath192 an analogous generalisation of is @xmath193 we assume now that the image is sampled successively on finer grids , with decreasing @xmath194 . note that the number of vertices of any region of the edge - weighted pixel graph , or any of the derived edge - weighted graphs introduced in section [ ssec - graphcons ] , grows in this process with @xmath195 . by using the volumes of spheres instead of the original cardinalities , provides a re - normalisation that compensates this effect in . thus , it is possible to consider the limit case @xmath196 . in this limit case , graphs turn into metric spaces representing the structure of a space - continuous image . additionally , these metric spaces are endowed with a volume measure which is the limit case of the discrete measures on graphs given by vertex counting . in simple cases , these metric spaces with volume measure can be manifolds . for example , for a homogeneous grey image without any contrast , the limit of the edge - weighted pixel graph is an approximation to a plane , i.e. a @xmath5-dimensional manifold . for an image with extreme contrasts in one direction , e.g. a stripe pattern , the edge - weighted pixel graphs will be path graphs , resulting in a metric space as limit which is essentially a @xmath6-dimensional manifold . finally , in the extreme case of a noise image in which neighbouring pixels have almost nowhere similar grey - values , the graph will practically decompose into numerous isolated connected components , corresponding to a discrete space of dimension @xmath197 . for more general textured images , the limit spaces will possess a more complicated topological structure . at the same time , it remains possible , of course , to measure volumes of spheres of different radii in these spaces . clearly , sphere volumes will increase with sphere radius . if they fulfil a power law , the ( possible non - integer ) exponent can immediately be interpreted as a dimension . the space itself is then interpreted as some type of fractal @xcite . the dimension concept underlying here is almost that of the minkowski dimension ( closely related to hausdorff dimension ) that is frequently used in fractal theory , with the difference that the volume measure here is inside the object being measured instead of in an embedding space . based on the above reasoning , values of the dimension will range between @xmath197 and @xmath5 . note that even in situations in which there is no global power law for the sphere volumes , and therefore no global dimension , power laws , possibly with varying exponents , will still be approximated for a given sphere centre in suitable ranges of the radius , thus allowing to define the fractal dimension as a quantity varying in space and resolution . this resembles the situation with most fractal concepts being applied to real - world data : the power laws that are required to hold for an ideal fractal across all scales will be found only for certain ranges of scales in reality . dijkstra trees , too , turn into @xmath6-dimensional manifolds in the case of sharp stripe images ; for other cases they will also yield fractals . fractal dimensions , wherever applicable , will be below those observed with the corresponding full edge - weighted pixel graphs , thus , the relevant range of dimensions is again bounded by @xmath197 from below and @xmath5 from above . one word of care must be said at this point . the fractal structures obtained here as limit cases of graphs for @xmath196 are not identical with the image manifolds whose fractal structures are studied as a means of texture analysis in @xcite and others . in fact , fractal dimensions of the latter , measured as minkowski dimensions by means of the embedding of the image manifold of a grey - scale image in three - dimensional euclidean space , range from @xmath5 to @xmath198 with increasing roughness of the image , whereas the dimensions measured in the present work go down from @xmath5 to @xmath197 for increasing image roughness . whereas it can be conjectured that these two fractal structures are related , future work will be needed to gain clarity about this relationship . based on the findings from the previous section , let us now assume that the limit @xmath196 from one of the graph structures results in a measured metric space @xmath199 of dimension @xmath200 $ ] , in which sphere volumes are given by the equation @xmath201 where @xmath202 is the volume of a unit sphere , @xmath203 denoting the gamma function . thus , we assume that @xmath204 interpolates the sphere volumes of euclidean spaces for integer @xmath205 . note that this assumption has indeed two parts . the first , , means that a volume measure on the metric space @xmath199 exists that behaves homogeneously with degree @xmath205 with regard to distances . in the manifold case ( integer @xmath205 ) , this is the case of vanishing curvature ; for general manifolds of integer dimension @xmath205 , would hold as an approximation for small radii . the second assumption , , corresponds to the euclideanness of the metric . for edge - weighted pixel graphs based on @xmath2- or @xmath3-neighbourhoods , the volume of unit spheres actually deviates from , even in the limit . however , with increasing neighbourhood size , is approximated better and better . most of the following analysis does not depend specifically on ; thus we will return to only later for numerical evaluation of information functionals . with we have @xmath206 where we have substituted @xmath207 . as a result , we obtain @xmath208 analogous considerations for @xmath92 from lead to @xmath209 as pointed out before , the metric structure of the fractal @xmath199 will in general be more complicated such that it does not possess a well - defined global dimension . however , such a dimension can be measured at each location and scale . the quantities @xmath85 and @xmath92 as stated in , can then be understood as functions of the local fractal dimension in a neighbourhood of vertex @xmath67 where the size of the neighbourhood the scale is controlled by the decay of the function @xmath210 in the integrands of and , respectively . as a result , we find that the information functionals @xmath85 and @xmath92 represent distribution over the input pixels of an image patch ( non - adaptive or adaptive ) in which the pixels are assigned different weights dependent on a local fractal dimension measure . the entropies @xmath48 and @xmath49 then measure the local homogeneity or inhomogeneity of this dimension distribution : for very homogeneous dimension values within a patch , the density resulting from each of the information functionals @xmath85 , @xmath92 will be fairly homogeneous , implying high entropy . the more the dimension values are spread out , the more will the density be dominated by a few pixels with high values of @xmath85 or @xmath92 , thus yielding low entropy . the precise dependency of the entropy on the dimension distribution will be slightly different for @xmath85 and @xmath92 and will also depend on the choice of @xmath211 . details of this dependency will be a topic of future work . 0.001 ( 1000 , 505 ) ( 5,500 ) ( 0,370 ) ( 190,260)@xmath205 ( 15,260)(a ) ( 333,500 ) ( 338,370 ) ( 525,260)@xmath205 ( 350,260)(b ) ( 661,500 ) ( 666,370 ) ( 853,260)@xmath205 ( 680,260)(c ) ( 5,240 ) ( 0,110 ) ( 190 , 0)@xmath205 ( 15 , 0)(d ) ( 333,240 ) ( 338,110 ) ( 525 , 0)@xmath205 ( 350 , 0)(e ) ( 661,240 ) ( 666,110 ) ( 853 , 0)@xmath205 ( 680 , 0)(f ) to give a basic intuition , we present in figure [ fi - fvfp ] graphs of @xmath212 and @xmath213 as functions of the dimension @xmath200 $ ] for selected values of @xmath211 . in computing these values , the specific choice for @xmath214 has been used . in the left column , frames ( a ) and ( b ) , we use @xmath157 as in our experiments in section [ sec - segex ] . here , both @xmath212 and @xmath213 increase drastically by almost @xmath215 from @xmath216 to @xmath217 and even by @xmath218 from @xmath217 to @xmath219 . in the resulting information functionals @xmath85 and @xmath92 , i.e. after applying @xmath220 to the functions shown in the figure , even pixels with only slightly higher values of the dimension strongly dominate the entire information density within the patch . for increasing @xmath211 , the rate of increment in @xmath85 and @xmath92 with @xmath205 becomes lower . for @xmath221 as shown in the second column , frames ( b ) and ( e ) , of figure [ fi - fvfp ] , the variation of @xmath212 and @xmath213 is already reduced to @xmath5 and @xmath2 , respectively , such that vertices across the entire dimension range @xmath222 $ ] will have a relevant influence on the information density . for even larger @xmath211 the dependency of @xmath85 and @xmath92 on @xmath205 becomes non - monotonic ( as shown in ( c ) for @xmath85 with @xmath223 ) and even monotonically decreasing ( for both @xmath85 and @xmath92 at @xmath224 ; not shown ) . it will therefore be interesting for further investigation to evaluate also the texture discrimination behaviour of the entropy measures for varying @xmath211 , as this may be a way to targeting the sensitivity of the measures specifically at certain dimension ranges . in this context , however , it becomes evident that the parameter @xmath211 plays two different roles at the same time . first , it steers the approximate radius of influence for the fractal dimension estimation . here , it is important that this radius of influence is smaller than the patch size underlying the graph construction , such that the cut - off of the graphs has no significant influence on the values of the information functional at the individual vertices . second , @xmath211 determines the shape and steepness of the function ( compare figure [ fi - fvfp ] ) that relates the local fractal dimension to the values of the information functionals . this makes it desirable to refine in future work the parametrisation of the exponential weighting scheme so that the two roles of @xmath211 are distributed to two parameters . in this paper , we have presented the framework of graph - index - based texture descriptors that has first been introduced in @xcite . particular emphasis was put on entropy - based graph indices that have proven in @xcite to afford medium to high sensitivity for texture differences . we have extended the work from @xcite in two directions . firstly , we have stated an approach to texture - based image segmentation in which the texture descriptor framework was integrated with geodesic active contours @xcite , a standard method for intensity - based image segmentation . this approach was already briefly introduced in @xcite and is demonstrated here by a larger set of experiments , including two synthetic and one real - world example . secondly , we have analysed one representative of the graph - entropy - based texture descriptors in order to gain insight about the image properties that this descriptor relies on . it turned out that it stands in close relation to measurements of fractal dimension of certain metric spaces that arise from the graphs in local image patches that underly our texture descriptors . although this type of fractal dimension measurement in images differs from existing applications of fractal theory in image ( and texture ) analysis , as the latter treat the image manifold as fractal object , results indicate that the two fractal approaches are related . our texture descriptor framework as a whole and also both novel contributions presented here require further research . to mention some topics , we start with parameter selection of the texture descriptors . in @xcite as well as in this paper , most parameters were fixed to specific values based on heuristics . a systematic investigation of the effect of variations of all these parameters is part of ongoing work . inclusion of novel graph descriptors proposed in the literature , e.g.@xcite , is a further option . the algorithms currently used for the computation of graph - entropy - based texture descriptors need computation times in the range of minutes already for small images . as the algorithms have not been designed for efficiency , there is much room for improvement which will also be considered in future work . both texture discrimination and texture segmentation have been demonstrated so far rather on a proof - of - concept level . extensive evaluation on larger sets of image data is ongoing . this is also necessary to gain more insight about the suitability of particular texture descriptors from our set for specific classes of textures . regarding the texture segmentation framework , the conceptual break between the graph - based set of texture descriptors and the partial differential equation for segmentation could be reduced by using e.g. a graph - cut segmentation method . it can be asked whether such a combination even allows for some synergy between the computation steps . this is not clear so far since the features used to weight graph edges are different : intensity contrasts in the texture descriptor phase ; texture descriptor differences in the graph - cut phase . in further course , the integration of graph - entropy - based texture descriptors into more complex segmentation frameworks will be a goal . unsupervised segmentation approaches are not capable to handle involved segmentation tasks ( like in medical diagnostics ) where highly accurate segmentation can only be achieved by including prior information on the shape and appearance of the objects to be segmented . state - of - the - art segmentation frameworks therefore combine the mechanisms of unsupervised segmentation approaches with model - based methods as introduced e.g. in @xcite . on the theoretical side , the analysis of the fractal limit of the descriptor construction will have to be refined and extended to include all six graph settings from section [ ssec - graphcons ] . relations between the fractal structures arising from the graph construction and the more image manifold more commonly treated in fractal - based image analysis will have to be analysed . generally , much more theoretical work deserves to be invested in understanding the connections and possible equivalences between the very disparate approaches to texture description that can be found in the literature . a graph - based approach like ours admits different directions of such comparisons . it can thus be speculated that it could play a pivotal role in understanding the relations between texture description methods , and create a unifying view on different methods that would also have implications for the understanding of texture itself . y. boykov , o. veksler , and r. zabih . markov random fields with efficient approximation . in _ proc . 1998 ieee computer society conference on computer vision and pattern recognition _ , pages 648655 , santa barbara , ca , june 1998 . a. buades , b. coll , and j. morel . a non - local algorithm for image denoising . in _ proc . 2005 ieee computer society conference on computer vision and pattern recognition _ , volume 2 , pages 6065 , san diego , ca , june 2005 . ieee computer society press . d. comaniciu and p. meer . robust analysis of feature spaces : color image segmentation . in _ proc . 1997 ieee computer society conference on computer vision and pattern recognition _ , pages 750755 , san juan , puerto rico , june 1997 . ieee computer society press . a. elmoataz , o. lezoray , v .- t . ta , and s. bougleux . partial difference equations on graphs for local and nonlocal image processing . in o. lezoray and l. grady , editors , _ image processing and analysis with graphs : theory and practice _ , chapter 7 , pages 174206 . crc press , boca raton , 2012 . m. ferrer and h. bunke . graph edit distance theory , algorithms , and applications . in o. lezoray and l. grady , editors , _ image processing and analysis with graphs : theory and practice _ , chapter 13 , pages 383422 . crc press , boca raton , 2012 . b. georgescu , i. shimshoni , and p. meer . mean shift based clustering in high dimensions : a texture classification example . in _ proc . 2003 ieee international conference on computer vision _ , volume 1 , pages 456463 , nice , oct . 2003 . h. ishikawa . graph cuts combinatorial optimization in vision . in o. lezoray and l. grady , editors , _ image processing and analysis with graphs : theory and practice _ , chapter 2 , pages 2563 . crc press , boca raton , 2012 . s. kichenassamy , a. kumar , p. olver , a. tannenbaum , and a. yezzi . gradient flows and geometric active contour models . in _ proc . fifth international conference on computer vision _ , pages 810815 , cambridge , ma , june 1995 . ieee computer society press . r. lerallut , . decencire , and f. meyer . image processing using morphological amoebas . in c. ronse , l. najman , and e. decencire , editors , _ mathematical morphology : 40 years on _ , volume 30 of _ computational imaging and vision _ , pages 1322 . springer , dordrecht , 2005 . o. lezoray and l. grady . graph theory concepts and definitions used in image processing and analysis . in o. lezoray and l. grady , editors , _ image processing and analysis with graphs : theory and practice _ , chapter 1 , pages 124 . crc press , boca raton , 2012 . l. lucchese and s. k. mitra . unsupervised segmentation of color images based on k - means clustering in the chromaticity plane . in _ proc . ieee workshop on content - based access of image and video libraries _ , pages 7478 , fort collins , co , 1999 . p. maragos . fractal aspects of speech signals : dimension and interpolation . in _ proc . 1991 international conference on acoustics , speech , and signal processing _ , volume 1 , pages 417420 , toronto , ontario , canada , may 1991 . l. najman and f. meyer . a short tour of mathematical morphology on edge and vertex weighted graphs . in o. lezoray and l. grady , editors , _ image processing and analysis with graphs : theory and practice _ , chapter 6 , pages 141173 . crc press , boca raton , 2012 . b. sandberg , t. chan , and l. vese . a level - set and gabor - based active contour algorithm for segmenting textured images . technical report cam-02 - 39 , department of mathematics , university of california at los angeles , ca , u.s.a . , july 2002 . m. welk . discrimination of image textures using graph indices . in m. dehmer and f. emmert - streib , editors , _ quantitative graph theory : mathematical foundations and applications _ , chapter 12 , pages 355386 . crc press , 2014 . m. welk and m. breu . morphological amoebas and partial differential equations . in p. w. hawkes , editor , _ advances in imaging and electron physics _ , volume 185 , pages 139212 . elsevier academic press , 2014 . l. zhu , w. ng , and s. han . classifying graphs using theoretical metrics : a study of feasibility . in j. xu , g. yu , s. zhou , and r. unland , editors , _ database systems for advanced applications _ , volume 6637 of _ lecture notes in computer science _ , pages 5364 . springer , berlin , 2011 . Abstract:

Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.

Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered . Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video . Paper: the behavior of scattering in the limit of high energy and fixed momentum transfer is described in qcd , at least for situations in which perturbation theory applies , by the balitskii - fadin - kuraev - lipatov ( bfkl ) pomeron @xcite ( or short distance pomeron ) . attempts to test experimentally this sector of qcd have started in the last few years , mainly based on measurements of deeply inelastic events at low values of the bjorken variable @xmath1 in lepton - hadron scattering @xcite and jet production at large rapidity separations in hadron - hadron collisions @xcite . in this paper we study the possibilities for investigating qcd pomeron effects in a different context , namely in photon - photon scattering at @xmath2 colliders , where the photons are produced from the lepton beams by bremsstrahlung . the results of this paper also apply to @xmath3 or @xmath4 colliders . some aspects of this study have been presented in refs . @xcite . the quantity we consider is the total cross section for off - shell photon scattering at high energy . this can be measured in @xmath5 collisions in which both the outgoing leptons are tagged . this cross section presents some theoretical advantages as a probe of qcd pomeron dynamics compared to the structure functions for deeply inelastic scattering off a proton ( see for instance the discussion in ref . @xcite ) or a ( quasi)-real photon ( see for example ref . @xcite ) , essentially because it does not involve a non - perturbative target . unlike protons or quasi - real photons , virtual photon states can be described through perturbative wave functions . in some respects the off - shell photon cross section presents analogies with the process of scattering of two quarkonia ( or `` onia '' ) , which has been proposed as a gedanken experiment to investigate the high energy regime in qcd @xcite . in this case , non - perturbative effects are suppressed by the smallness of the onium radius . in the case of virtual photons the size of the wave function is controlled by the photon virtuality instead of the heavy quark mass . it is an interesting feature of investigations at @xmath6 colliders that this size can be tuned by measuring the momenta of the outgoing leptons . on the other hand , such experimental studies may prove to be difficult due to the smallness of the available rates . as we shall see , for large photon virtualities @xmath7 the cross section falls off like @xmath8 . an estimate of the number of events that one may expect to be available for such studies at lep200 and a future linear @xmath9 collider will be provided later in the paper . there have recently been other investigations of the high energy regime in the context of photon - photon scattering . balitskii @xcite has proposed an expansion of the scattering amplitude in the high energy limit in terms of wilson line operators . this method provides an elegant reformulation of the bfkl problem , and may prove to be useful to get beyond the leading logarithm approximation . bartels , de roeck and lotter @xcite have evaluated the photon - photon cross section at present and future @xmath6 colliders . their results are similar to those in refs . @xcite . in ref . @xcite detailed studies have been carried out for diffractive meson production and photon structure functions at lep200 . to describe the electron - positron scattering process ( fig . [ fee ] ) , we will parametrize the five - fold differential cross section as @xmath10 \hspace*{0.8 cm } . % \ ] ] here we denote by @xmath11 the fractions of the longitudinal momenta of the leptons a and b that are carried by the photons , by @xmath12 the photon virtualities , and by @xmath13 the angle between the lepton scattering planes in a frame in which the photons are aligned with the @xmath14 axis . the overall factor in the right hand side gives the distribution averaged over the angle @xmath13 , while @xmath15 , @xmath16 are the asymmetries . ( figee.eps width 8 cm ) we will start by considering the @xmath13-averaged cross section , and we will express it in the equivalent photon approximation @xcite by folding the @xmath17 cross section with the flux of photons from each lepton . this flux is proportional to the probability density for the splitting @xmath18 , and depends on the photon polarization . we will thus write @xmath19 where the transverse and longitudinal photon flux factors @xmath20 , @xmath21 are given by @xmath22 and @xmath23 , with @xmath24 , is the cross section for the scattering of two photons with polarizations @xmath25 and @xmath26 . we will proceed in the following way . in sec . [ sec : notations ] we set our notations and describe the born approximation to the photon - photon cross section at high energy . in this section we concentrate on the case of transversely polarized photons , that is , the cross section @xmath27 in eq . ( [ epaave ] ) above . in sec . [ sec : polarization ] we extend these results to include the full polarization dependence and we discuss the associated asymmetries . in sec . [ sec : summation ] we consider the summation of the leading logarithmic corrections to the photon - photon cross section due to bfkl pomeron exchange , and emphasize how the perturbative results depend on the total energy and the photon virtualities . [ sec : scales ] and [ sec : limitations ] are devoted to discussing some of the limitations of the treatment based on the bfkl equation . in sec . [ sec : scales ] we focus on the dependence of the cross section on two mass scales ( in the running coupling and in the high energy logarithms ) , which are left undetermined in a leading log analysis . in sec . [ sec : limitations ] we consider the limitations of using the bfkl approach that follow from the behavior at very large @xmath28 . [ sec : virtuality ] illustrates how to relate the summed result for the photon - photon cross section to the small-@xmath1 behavior of the photon deeply inelastic structure function . in sec . [ sec : regge ] we compare the qcd result with expectations based on traditional regge theory . in sec . [ sec : softandhard ] we consider the limit of low photon virtualities and discuss the region of transition between hard and soft scattering . the rates at the level of the @xmath29 cross section are examined in sec . [ sec : numerical ] . some concluding remarks are given in sec . [ sec : conclusions ] . we collect in appendix [ app : born ] the details of the born order calculation , and in appendix [ app : quark ] some formulas which are useful for comparing the gluon - exchange and quark - exchange contributions to the photon - photon cross section . we consider the total cross section for the scattering of two transversely polarized virtual ( space - like ) photons @xmath30 and @xmath31 , with virtualities @xmath32 and @xmath33 , in the high energy region where the center - of - mass energy @xmath34 is much larger than @xmath35 , @xmath36 . we also suppose that the photon virtualities are in turn large with respect to the qcd scale @xmath37 , so that the process occurs at short distances ( much smaller than @xmath38 ) and qcd perturbation theory applies . we work in a reference frame in which the incoming photons have zero transverse momenta , and are boosted along the positive and negative light - cone directions . for a four - momentum @xmath39 , we define the `` @xmath40 '' and `` @xmath41 '' momentum components @xmath42 , @xmath43 as @xmath44 the incoming photon momenta are parametrized as follows in a notation where @xmath45 : @xmath46 here the `` @xmath40 '' and `` @xmath41 '' components @xmath47 approximately build up the total energy @xmath28 , and are much larger than the initial virtualities @xmath48 the born contribution to this cross section is given by the high energy approximation to the reaction @xmath49 in lowest order perturbation theory . the corresponding diagrams involve the exchange of two gluons between the two quark - antiquark pairs @xcite , and are exemplified in fig . [ ftwoglu ] . we parametrize the outgoing quark momenta as @xmath50 and denote by @xmath51 the exchanged gluon momentum . in the high energy limit defined by eq . ( [ qaplusqbminus ] ) , the kinematic region which dominates the integrations is the one in which the transverse momenta flowing in the loops are of the order of the initial virtualities , and the light - cone components of the exchanged gluon are suppressed with respect to the transverse momenta by a quantity of order @xmath52 or @xmath53 , so that @xmath54 . ( figtwoglu.eps width 7 cm ) the squared amplitude for the graph in fig . [ ftwoglu ] , integrated over the final quark and antiquark phase space , for fixed transverse photon polarizations @xmath55 , @xmath56 , is given by @xmath57 } \over { \left ( ( p_a + k)^2 + i \ , \varepsilon \right ) \left ( ( p_a - q_a)^2 - i \ , \varepsilon \right ) } } \ , \ , \nonumber \\ & & \times \ , { { { \rm tr}\bigl [ { \rlap / p}_b ( i g_s t^r \gamma^\alpha)\ , i\ , ( { \rlap / p}_b - \rlap / k ) \ , ( i \ , e_b \ , e { \rlap/\varepsilon}_b ) \ , ( { \rlap / q}_b - { \rlap / p}_b + \rlap / k ) ( - i g_s t^s \gamma^\beta ) ( - i ) ( { \rlap / p}_b - { \rlap / q}_b ) ( - i e_b e { \rlap/\varepsilon}_b ) \bigr ] } \over { \left ( ( p_b - k)^2 + i \ , \varepsilon \right ) \left ( ( p_b - q_b)^2 - i \ , \varepsilon \right ) } } \;\;. \nonumber % \end{aligned}\ ] ] here @xmath58 , @xmath59 are the electric charges of the quarks in units of @xmath60 , and the indices @xmath61 run over the light quark flavors , @xmath62 . ( the flavors @xmath63 need a separate treatment . ) in the high energy approximation this amplitude takes the form @xmath64 } \over { \left [ z_a \ , ( 1-z_a ) \ , q^2_a + ( { { \bf p}}_a + { { \bf k}})^2 \right ] \ , \left [ z_a \ , ( 1-z_a ) \ , q^2_a + { { \bf p}}_a^2 \right ] \ , } } \ , \nonumber \\ & & \times \ , { { \left [ 4 z_b ( 1 - z_b ) { \bf{\varepsilon}}_b \cdot { { \bf p}}_b \ ; { \bf{\varepsilon}}_b \cdot ( { { \bf p}}_b - { \bf k } ) - { { \bf p}}_b \cdot ( { { \bf p}}_b - { \bf k } ) \right ] } \over { \left [ z_b \ , ( 1-z_b ) \ , q^2_b + ( { { \bf p}}_b - { { \bf k}})^2 \right ] \ , \left [ z_b \ , ( 1-z_b ) \ , q^2_b + { { \bf p}}_b^2 \right ] \ , } } \;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;. % \end{aligned}\ ] ] see appendix a for details of this calculation . the amplitudes for the other graphs , in which the gluons are connected to different fermion lines , can be derived from eq . ( [ m3 ] ) by using the replacements @xmath65 \to { { 1-z_a } \over { z_a } } \ , \left [ z_a \ , ( 1-z_a ) \ , q^2_a + { { \bf p}}_a^2 \right ] \ , % \ ] ] in the denominator , and @xmath66 in the numerator . ( analogous replacements hold for the momentum components of the quark @xmath67 ) . in addition , the contribution from the graphs in which the quark and antiquark lines are interchanged can be obtained by symmetrizing the above expressions with respect to @xmath68 ( and , analogously , @xmath69 ) . we add the graphs , and divide by @xmath70 to form the @xmath71 cross section @xmath72 we find @xmath73 the factors @xmath74 in this formula come from the gluon propagators . these factors multiply functions @xmath75 , which describe the coupling of the exchanged gluon to the quark - antiquark system created by the virtual photon with virtuality @xmath7 and transverse polarization @xmath76 . the explicit expression for @xmath77 is @xmath78 } \over { \left [ { { \bf p}}^2 + z \ , ( 1-z ) \ , q^2 \right]^2 } } - { { \left [ { { \bf p } } \cdot ( { { \bf p } } + { \bf k } ) - 4 z ( 1 - z ) { \bf{\varepsilon } } \cdot { { \bf p } } \ ; { \bf{\varepsilon } } \cdot ( { { \bf p } } + { \bf k } ) \right ] } \over { \left [ ( { { \bf p } } + { { \bf k}})^2 + z \ , ( 1-z ) \ , q^2 \right ] \ , \left [ { { \bf p}}^2 + z \ , ( 1-z ) \ , q^2 \right ] } } \right\ } \;\;\;\;. \nonumber % \end{aligned}\ ] ] the functions @xmath77 can be thought of as `` color functions '' of the virtual photon since they describe the color flow in the @xmath79 states . from the point of view of light - cone perturbation theory @xcite , they correspond to the coupling of the null - plane photon wave function to gluons . in the remainder of this section we discuss the case of the average over the two transverse photon polarizations . the detailed polarization dependence of the color functions @xmath77 and the associated polarization asymmetry in the cross section are treated in sec . [ sec : polarization ] . by taking the polarization average @xmath80 we define the function @xmath81 @xmath82 we find @xmath83 \ , \nonumber \\ & ~ & \times \ , \left [ { { { { \bf p}}^2 } \over { \left [ { { \bf p}}^2 + z \ , ( 1-z ) \ , q^2 \right]^2 } } - { { { { \bf p } } \cdot ( { { \bf p } } + { \bf k } ) } \over { \left [ ( { { \bf p } } + { { \bf k}})^2 + z \ , ( 1-z ) \ , q^2 \right ] \ , \left [ { { \bf p}}^2 + z \ , ( 1-z ) \ , q^2 \right ] } } \right ] \;\;. % \end{aligned}\ ] ] each one of the two @xmath84-dependent terms in the integrand of eq . ( [ gi1funct ] ) would lead to an ultraviolet divergent integral , but the divergence cancels in the sum , illustrating that the gluon does not couple to the color singlet @xmath85 system in the limit @xmath86 . the photon virtuality @xmath7 regularizes the denominators in the infrared region , @xmath87 . in the limit of small @xmath7 , the probability density @xmath88 / 2 $ ] for the splitting of a transversely polarized photon into a quark - antiquark pair @xmath89 correctly factors out in front of the logarithmic singularity @xmath90 associated with the region of strong ordering @xmath91 . by introducing the feynman parametrization @xmath92 \ , \left [ { { \bf p}}^2 + z \ , ( 1-z ) \ , q^2 \right]^2 } } \nonumber \\ & & \hspace*{2 cm } \ , = \int^1_0 \ , d \lambda \ , { { 2 \,(1 - \lambda ) } \over { \left [ ( { { \bf p } } + \lambda \ , { { \bf k}})^2 + z \ , ( 1-z ) \ , q^2 + \lambda \ , ( 1 - \lambda ) { { \bf k}}^2 \right]^3 } } % \end{aligned}\ ] ] and carrying out the integration over the shifted transverse momentum variable @xmath93 in eq . ( [ gi1funct ] ) , one can obtain the following useful representation of the function @xmath94 as an integral over two dimensionless variables : @xmath95 \ , \left [ z^2 + ( 1 - z)^2 \right ] } \over { \lambda \ , ( 1 - \lambda ) \,{{\bf k}}^2 + z \ , ( 1-z ) \ , q^2 } } \hspace*{0.5 cm } . % \ ] ] this representation explicitly shows that the distribution @xmath96 is symmetric under interchange of the space - like boson virtualities @xmath97 and @xmath7 . in the configurations in which one of the virtualities is much smaller than the other one , this distribution is logarithmically enhanced . more precisely , we find @xmath98 \hspace*{0.5 cm } , \hspace*{0.8 cm } { { \bf k}}^2 \ll q^2 \hspace*{0.5 cm } , % \ ] ] @xmath99 \hspace*{0.5 cm } , \hspace*{0.8 cm } { { \bf k}}^2 \gg q^2 \hspace*{0.5 cm } , % \ ] ] where the coefficient in front of the logarithm is given by the first moment of the splitting density @xmath100 = { 2 \over 3 } \hspace*{1 cm } . % \ ] ] the logarithmic behavior at small @xmath97 comes from the region @xmath101 . here the quark transverse momentum is much smaller than the photon virtuality , and the quark longitudinal momentum fraction is very small , @xmath102 ( or @xmath103 ) . this region is sometimes referred to as the aligned - jet region , and corresponds to configurations in which the @xmath85 system fluctuates to large sizes @xcite . note that while for the case at hand of the @xmath104 total cross section this region contributes only a logarithmic enhancement , for the case of non - inclusive processes , such as processes involving rapidity gaps , this is expected to become the dominant contribution @xcite . the integration over the parameter @xmath105 in eq . ( [ twodimintg ] ) can be explicitly performed . this yields @xmath106 \ , , % \ ] ] where we have introduced the variables @xmath107 in fig . [ glin ] , we report the result of the numerical evaluation of the integral ( [ etaxig ] ) by plotting the function @xmath81 versus @xmath108 . ( figglin.eps width 13 cm ) the unpolarized @xmath109 cross section to born order , @xmath110 , can be obtained by inserting the result for the function @xmath81 in the general formula ( [ convsigma ] ) . it is convenient to use the representation ( [ twodimintg ] ) of @xmath81 . by substituting this representation in eq . ( [ convsigma ] ) , and carrying out the integration over the gluon transverse momentum @xmath111 , we obtain @xmath112 \int_0 ^ 1 \ , { d \ , \lambda_a } \left [ \lambda_a^2 + ( 1 - \lambda_a)^2 \right ] \ , \nonumber \\ & & \times \int_0 ^ 1 \ , { d \ , z_b } \left [ z_b^2 + ( 1 - z_b)^2 \right ] \int_0 ^ 1 \ , { d \ , \lambda_b } \left [ \lambda_b^2 + ( 1 - \lambda_b)^2 \right ] \ , \nonumber \\ & & \times { { \ln \left [ { q_a^2 \ , z_a \ , ( 1 - z_a ) \ , \lambda_b \ , ( 1 - \lambda_b ) } / \left ( { q_b^2 \ , z_b \ , ( 1 - z_b ) \ , \lambda_a \ , ( 1 - \lambda_a ) } \right ) \right ] } \over { q_a^2 \ , z_a \ , ( 1 - z_a ) \ , \lambda_b \ , ( 1 - \lambda_b ) - q_b^2 \ , z_b \ , ( 1 - z_b ) \ , \lambda_a \ , ( 1 - \lambda_a ) } } \hspace*{0.5 cm } . % \end{aligned}\ ] ] this formula provides an expression for the cross section in the large @xmath28 limit in terms of dimensionless integrals , which allows us to study the dependence on the energy and mass scales . to this order in perturbation theory the cross section has a constant behavior with the energy @xmath28 . the cross section depends on the mass scales @xmath113 and @xmath114 only . factoring out an overall scale factor @xmath115 in eq . ( [ sigmarepr ] ) , we are left with a function @xmath116 of the ratio @xmath117 : @xmath118 the function @xmath116 can be computed by performing numerically the integrations over the dimensionless variables @xmath14 s and @xmath105 s . the result is plotted in fig . [ s0 ] . ( figs0.eps width 13 cm ) notice that the dependence of @xmath116 on @xmath119 is rather mild when @xmath119 is near 1 . thus , in this region , @xmath116 in eq . ( [ tildesigmadef ] ) could be treated as a constant , so that @xmath120 when , in contrast , the two virtualities are widely disparate from each other , either @xmath121 or @xmath122 , the function @xmath116 has a strong dependence on @xmath119 , vanishing linearly ( modulo logarithmic enhancements ) with either @xmath123 or @xmath119 , respectively . this provides the overall change of scale in the cross section @xmath124 @xmath125 we will come back to this later on and examine the details of these behaviors numerically ( see sec . [ sec : virtuality ] ) . we now study the dependence of the color functions @xmath77 and of the photon - photon cross section on the polarization of the virtual photon . working in the frame defined by eq . ( [ qaqb ] ) , and denoting by @xmath126 , @xmath127 the lightlike unit vectors @xmath128 we introduce the following decomposition of the polarization tensor for the photon @xmath129 : @xmath130 the index @xmath131 in the first term in the right hand side of eq . ( [ gmunu ] ) runs over the transverse polarizations . we describe these polarizations by using the linear basis @xmath132 from the second term in the right hand side of eq . ( [ gmunu ] ) , we define the longitudinal polarization vector as @xmath133 the last term in eq . ( [ gmunu ] ) does not contribute because of current conservation . we thus have @xmath134 formulas analogous to eqs . ( [ gmunu])-([gmunubis ] ) , but with @xmath135 replaced by @xmath136 , hold for the photon @xmath137 . let us first consider the case of transverse polarizations . it is convenient to introduce the tensor amplitude @xmath138 by rewriting eq . ( [ capitalg ] ) in the form @xmath139 the explicit expression for @xmath138 can be found in appendix a. for polarization indices @xmath140 we also introduce the notation @xmath141 we can parametrize the transverse components of the tensor @xmath142 in terms of two scalar functions @xmath143 and @xmath144 : @xmath145 the function @xmath81 represents the unpolarized color function , which we have discussed in the previous section ( eqs . ( [ avg ] ) , ( [ gi1funct ] ) ) . the function @xmath144 carries the information on the polarization dependence . its explicit expression is @xmath146 ^ 2 } } + { { { { \bf p } } \cdot ( { { \bf p } } + { \bf k } ) - 2 \ , ( { { \bf p } } + { \bf k } ) \cdot { \bf k } \ ; { { \bf p } } \cdot { \bf k } / { { \bf k}}^2 } \over { \left [ ( { { \bf p } } + { { \bf k}})^2 + z \ , ( 1-z ) \ , q^2 \right ] \ , \left [ { { \bf p}}^2 + z \ , ( 1-z ) \ , q^2 \right ] } } \right ] \;\;. % \end{aligned}\ ] ] the integrals in eq . ( [ g21 ] ) can be handled using the same procedure as in the unpolarized case : @xmath147 \ , , \nonumber % \end{aligned}\ ] ] where we have used the variables defined in eq . ( [ etaxi ] ) . correspondingly , the cross section for scattering transversely polarized photons , eq.([convsigma ] ) , can be decomposed as @xmath148 \hspace*{0.6 cm } . % \ ] ] the polarization average @xmath149 has been given to order @xmath150 in the previous section ( eq . ( [ sigmarepr ] ) ) , and the asymmetry @xmath151 to the same order @xmath150 is given in terms of the color function @xmath152 as @xmath153 numerical results are reported in figs . [ glin ] and [ s0 ] , where we plot @xmath152 versus @xmath154 , and show the dependence of @xmath151 on the incoming photon virtualities . unlike @xmath81 , @xmath152 is not logarithmically enhanced in the regions @xmath155 , @xmath156 . this is related to the fact that the splitting function associated with @xmath152 has zeros at the endpoints of the spectrum in the longitudinal momentum fraction , @xmath157 and @xmath158 ( see eq . ( [ g22 ] ) ) , whereas the unpolarized splitting function goes to a finite constant . the asymmetry @xmath151 associated with the photon - photon scattering process , calculated here in the born approximation , contributes to the asymmetry @xmath16 in eq . ( [ dsdphi ] ) at the level of the @xmath159 scattering . numerical results for the @xmath159 process will be given in sec . [ sec : numerical ] . we now move on to the case of the longitudinal polarization . let us consider the longitudinal - longitudinal color function : @xmath160 following the lines of the calculation described in detail for the case of transverse photons , we find @xmath161 ^ 2 } } - { { q^2 } \over { \left [ ( { { \bf p } } + { { \bf k}})^2 + z \ , ( 1-z ) \ , q^2 \right ] \ , \left [ { { \bf p}}^2 + z \ , ( 1-z ) \ , q^2 \right ] } } \right ] \;\;. % \end{aligned}\ ] ] this contribution equals the color function @xmath152 given above . this can be seen by introducing an integral over a feynman parameter @xmath105 , then integrating over the transverse momentum @xmath162 in eq . ( [ gll1 ] ) . we get @xmath163 as noted above , @xmath152 has no logarithms at small @xmath164 . this corresponds to the absence of aligned - jet terms for longitudinally polarized photons @xcite . contributions from longitudinally polarized photons enter the @xmath159 cross section ( [ epaave ] ) . they will be included in the numerical estimates that we give in sec . [ sec : numerical ] . finally , we consider the interference contribution between longitudinal and transverse polarizations : @xmath165 in the high energy approximation in which we are working , this contribution vanishes . this can be seen explicitly by writing the color function in the general form @xmath166 and computing the invariant function @xmath167 . we get @xmath168 interference terms of the kind in eq . ( [ gtl ] ) would give rise to the asymmetry @xmath15 ( see eq . ( [ dsdphi ] ) ) at the level of the @xmath169 scattering process . we thus see that this asymmetry vanishes in the high energy approximation . we have seen that the two - gluon exchange mechanism gives rise to a constant @xmath170 total cross section at large @xmath28 , @xmath171 . to higher orders in perturbation theory , the iteration of gluon ladders in the @xmath172-channel promotes this constant to logarithms , and the perturbative expansion of the cross section at high energy has the form @xmath173 \hspace*{0.6 cm } , \hspace*{0.8 cm } l = \ln ( s / q^2 ) \hspace*{0.6 cm } , % \ ] ] where @xmath7 is a scale of the order of the initial photon virtualities , the sum represents the series of the leading logarithms to all orders in the strong coupling @xmath174 , and the dots stand for non - leading terms . to study the high energy behavior , it is convenient to analyze the cross section in its mellin - fourier moments , defined by @xmath175 where the @xmath176-integral goes along a contour parallel to the imaginary axis and to the right of any singularities in @xmath177 . we see from this definition that a constant behavior of the cross section with the energy @xmath28 is generated by a simple pole in the moments @xmath177 at @xmath178 , while powers of logarithms are generated by multiple poles at @xmath178 . the inverse of ( [ mellin ] ) is @xmath179 to sum the leading logarithmic terms , the basic observation of bfkl @xcite is that the logarithms arise when multiple soft gluons are emitted into the final state . these gluons have transverse momenta @xmath180 of the same order as @xmath35 and @xmath36 and have strongly ordered rapidities , lying between the rapidities of the quarks in photon @xmath181 and the quarks in photon @xmath182 . along with emission of real gluons , one also includes the exchange of corresponding virtual gluons . [ fac ] illustrates how the two gluon exchange graph of fig . [ ftwoglu ] is generalized to allow for multiple gluon emission . the quarks comprising photon @xmath181 couple to a gluon with momentum @xmath183 , while the quarks comprising photon @xmath182 couple to a gluon with momentum @xmath184 . gluons can be exchanged or emitted into the final state inside the subgraph labeled @xmath185 . in fact , the gluons that carry momenta @xmath183 and @xmath184 are , in general , combinations of soft gluons that carry a net color octet charge , that is , reggeized gluons @xcite . from a kinematic viewpoint , we can treat these as being equivalent to ordinary perturbative gluons . we consider the unpolarized @xmath186 cross section and adopt the following notation for the diagram in fig . [ fac ] : @xmath187 here @xmath188 represents the four - point green function for gluons @xmath189 and @xmath190 , while the functions @xmath191 represent the quark loops . we have made the following approximation . we note that the quark loop for photon @xmath181 depends sensitively on the minus component , @xmath192 , of the momentum that enters the quark loop via gluon @xmath181 . on the other hand , the quarks in photon @xmath182 have very large minus components of momenta . furthermore , because of strong rapidity ordering , all the other gluons inside of @xmath185 have minus components of momenta that are much larger than @xmath192 . thus we can neglect @xmath192 everywhere except in the quark loop for photon @xmath181 . then we include the integration over @xmath192 in the definition of @xmath193 . similarly we neglect @xmath194 everywhere except in the quark loop for photon @xmath182 and we include the integration over @xmath194 in the definition of @xmath195 . ( figfac.eps width 8 cm ) consider eq . ( [ genfig ] ) specialized to the case of two gluon exchange . the approximate gluon four - point function @xmath196 is trivial in this case : @xmath197 we identify @xmath198 then we recover the earlier result ( [ convsigma ] ) . for a generic term in @xmath199 , the transverse momenta @xmath200 and @xmath201 are independent variables , while the factor @xmath202 turns into @xmath203 . taking moments with respect to @xmath28 and changing integration variables to @xmath204 , @xmath205 and @xmath206 gives the structure @xmath207 having evaluated @xmath208 at some fixed perturbative order , we are interested in the poles of @xmath177 at @xmath178 . there are poles from the small @xmath209 and @xmath210 ends of the integrations over @xmath209 and @xmath210 . to evaluate @xmath177 without losing any powers of @xmath211 , we approximate @xmath212 the pole associated with the integration over @xmath209 can be thought of as arising from the integration over the rapidity of the final state gluon with the largest rapidity . almost all of the momentum fraction @xmath209 is taken by this gluon . since , in the leading logarithmic approximation , this gluon has a rapidity that is much less than that of the quarks in photon @xmath181 , the momentum fraction @xmath209 is negligible compared to 1 . similarly , the pole associated with the integration over @xmath210 can be thought of as arising from the integration over the rapidity of the final state gluon with the most negative rapidity . the poles from the large @xmath105 end of the integration over the function @xmath208 can be thought of as arising from integrations over final state gluons with intermediate rapidities . the leading logarithmic result can thus be written in the form @xmath213 where @xmath214 is the bfkl function that describes the interaction of gluons with fast moving colored systems moving in opposite directions and obeys the bfkl equation @xcite . it is normalized so that at order @xmath215 we have @xmath216 the solution to the bfkl equation can be written to all orders in @xmath174 in the form @xmath217 where @xmath218 the function @xmath219 is determined by solving the eigenvalue problem for the bfkl kernel and is given by @xmath220 with @xmath221 being the euler @xmath221-function . the bfkl function ( [ gareprf ] ) has poles at @xmath178 order by order in perturbation theory . ( [ ktfac ] ) shows that the poles in the @xmath104 cross section are generated from the ones in @xmath222 by integrating the color functions over @xmath180 . while these functions are specific to the off - shell photon probe , the function @xmath223 is universal . the same function contributes to the small @xmath1 behavior of the cross sections in hadron - initiated processes @xcite via the high energy factorization formulas . by inserting the representation ( [ gareprf ] ) in eq . ( [ ktfac ] ) , and scaling out the dependence on the photon virtualities , we get @xmath224 where @xmath225 is defined as the following @xmath226-transform of the photon color function @xmath227 @xmath228 the explicit expression of the function @xmath229 can be determined by using the representation ( [ twodimintg ] ) and performing the integral transform . the result reads @xmath230 eq . ( [ gareprsi ] ) , together with the explicit formulas ( [ chi ] ) , ( [ viexp ] ) , gives the leading logarithmic result for the moments of the @xmath231 total cross section . it sums the @xmath211 poles to the accuracy @xmath232 , for any @xmath233 . the lowest order perturbative contribution , @xmath234 , can be recovered from the summed formula ( [ gareprsi ] ) by expanding the denominator @xmath235 to the zeroth order in @xmath174 . the simple pole @xmath236 is the mellin transform of unity , and one can check numerically that the @xmath237-integral @xmath238 agrees with eq . ( [ sigmarepr ] ) and fig . [ s0 ] . in general , multiple pole contributions @xmath239 to the cross section are obtained by retaining higher orders in the @xmath174-expansion of eq . ( [ gareprsi ] ) . we see that the general structure of the coefficients of the leading logarithmic series comes from both @xmath219 and @xmath240 : the former is a universal function associated with the bfkl pomeron , while the latter describes the coupling of the pomeron to a specific physical source . the total cross section is obtained from eq . ( [ gareprsi ] ) by taking the inverse mellin - fourier transform ( [ mellin ] ) . by evaluating the @xmath176-integral from the residue at the pole @xmath241 , one gets @xmath242 note that this result depends on two mass scales , the scale @xmath243 in @xmath174 and the scale @xmath7 in the high energy corrections , whose reliable determination would require a next - to - leading analysis . we discuss the uncertainties in the leading log result associated with these scales in secs . [ sec : scales ] and [ sec : numerical ] . in the limit @xmath244 the integral ( [ energy ] ) is dominated by the region near @xmath245 , where the function @xmath246 has a saddle point . in the saddle point approximation one obtains @xmath247 with @xmath248 eq . ( [ saddle ] ) shows the asymptotic power behavior characteristic of the qcd pomeron , @xmath249 with @xmath250 . the pre - factor that determines the normalization of the asymptotic cross section , on the other hand , depends on the off - shell photon probe , and is controlled by the value of the function @xmath251 at @xmath252 . if the two photon virtualities are significantly far apart , corrections of order @xmath253 need to be taken into account when one calculates the large @xmath28 limit . in this case , one finds that the position of the saddle point is shifted to @xmath254 . apart from corrections in the pre - factor , the net effect of evaluating the integral ( [ energy ] ) around the shifted saddle point is to multiply the expression in the right hand side of eq . ( [ saddle ] ) by the factor @xmath255 \;\;\ ; . % \ ] ] the cross section acquires a gaussian modulation in @xmath256 with a width that grows like @xmath257 . ( figxsect.eps width 13 cm ) in the general case , the integral ( [ energy ] ) can be performed numerically . in fig . [ xsect ] we show the result as a function of @xmath258 for a given choice of the values of the photon virtualities and the strong coupling . for comparison we also plot the saddle point formula . as the energy increases the two curves get closer . however , in the range considered , the sub - asymptotic contributions are still significant ( about @xmath259 at @xmath260 , @xmath261 at @xmath262 ) . the large size of the corrections to the saddle point approximation can be mainly traced back to the fact that the function @xmath263 itself is rather sharply peaked around @xmath264 . this is illustrated in fig . [ chi05 ] , where we see that , for instance , for @xmath265 and @xmath266 , the width of the pomeron factor is still not small compared to the width of the factor associated with the off - shell photon color function . this effect accounts for most of the shift in the normalization of the cross section between the asymptotic and exact evaluation of the leading logarithmic sum . ( figchi05.eps width 13 cm ) using the same method described above for the cross section averaged over the two transverse photon polarizations , one can derive summed results for each photon polarization @xmath267 and for the polarization asymmetry @xmath151 . denoting by @xmath25 , @xmath268 and @xmath26 , @xmath269 the polarization indices for photons @xmath129 and @xmath137 , we write the factorization formula for the moments of the polarized cross section @xmath270 as @xmath271 the color functions @xmath77 have been discussed in sec . [ sec : polarization ] . the full solution for the green s function @xmath272 of the bfkl pomeron reads @xcite @xmath273 with @xmath274 the function @xmath223 in eq . ( [ gareprf ] ) , relevant to the case of the unpolarized cross section , is given by the term @xmath275 in eq . ( [ gareprfm ] ) . consider the product @xmath276 of the asymmetry times the averaged cross section , with the asymmetry @xmath151 defined in eq . ( [ unplusass ] ) . due to the azimuthal integration only the terms with @xmath277 in eq . ( [ gareprfm ] ) contribute . substituting the color function @xmath152 ( see eq . ( [ gij ] ) ) in eq . ( [ ktfacpol ] ) , one finds for the @xmath176 moments @xmath278 where @xmath279 is defined from the @xmath226-transform of the function @xmath280 analogous to ( [ videf ] ) , and has the expression @xmath281 by inverse mellin - fourier transformation , one obtains the summed formula for the asymmetry in the energy space : @xmath282 where @xmath149 is given by eq . ( [ energy ] ) . as in the case of the unpolarized cross section , the asymptotic behavior in the limit @xmath244 is determined by the saddle point approximation to the integral in eq . ( [ energyasy ] ) . in this case we observe a negative power law with the energy @xmath28 , controlled by the value of @xmath283 at the saddle point , @xmath284 , indicating that the angular correlations between the two photons tend to be washed out when bfkl pomeron exchange dominates . the contributions to the photon - photon cross section from longitudinally polarized photons are given by formulas analogous to eq . ( [ energy ] ) in terms of different combinations of the functions @xmath285 and @xmath286 , and the same function @xmath246 : @xmath287 unlike @xmath288 in eq . ( [ viexp ] ) , @xmath289 has simple poles at @xmath290 ( instead of double poles ) , corresponding to the non - logarithmic behavior of the color function @xmath152 at @xmath291 , @xmath156 noted in sec . [ sec : polarization ] . replacing functions @xmath285 by functions @xmath286 accounts for the different size of the longitudinal cross sections with respect to the purely transverse one . roughly , one finds @xmath292 the result ( [ energy ] ) for the @xmath104 cross section depends on two mass scales which can not be determined in a leading logarithmic analysis : the mass @xmath243 at which the running coupling @xmath174 is evaluated , and the mass @xmath7 that provides the scale for the high energy logarithms . the former can be thought of as being associated with the integrations over the transverse momenta in the loops contributing to higher order diagrams , while the latter stems from the longitudinal integrations . a reliable determination of these scales would require a next - to - leading order calculation . lacking this , we provide here qualitative arguments to relate these scales with the physical hard scales of the problem . in sec . [ sec : numerical ] we will use these relations to examine numerically the dependence of the cross section on the scale choices . a possible choice of the scale @xmath243 in the strong coupling is based on the prescription of ref . @xcite . to apply this prescription , we consider the lowest order gluon exchange contribution , which we have discussed in sec . [ sec : notations ] . this is given ( see eq . ( [ convsigma ] ) ) by the integral in @xmath293 of two @xmath77 factors , each of which is proportional to @xmath174 , @xmath294 . we first compute the quark loop contribution to the gluon propagator , renormalized in the @xmath295 scheme : @xmath296 \;\;\;\ ; , % \ ] ] where @xmath297 is the contribution to @xmath298 from one quark loop , and @xmath299 . inserting a quark loop into the gluon propagator in the lowest order diagram amounts to replacing @xmath300 by @xmath301 % \ ] ] ( as in @xcite this can be regarded as a contribution to an effective coupling @xmath302 ) . now , following @xcite we choose the scale @xmath243 so that the quark loop contribution vanishes after integrating over @xmath97 : @xmath303 this is the same procedure that applies in the case of the abelian theory . using the representation ( [ twodimintg ] ) for @xmath77 , we are led to calculate an integral of the form @xmath304 exploiting the symmetry of the integrand under the transformation @xmath305 and interchange of the variables @xmath306 , @xmath307 , one can show that the condition ( [ vanish ] ) is satisfied by @xmath308 note that , when the two photon virtualities @xmath113 and @xmath114 are far apart from each other , the prescription @xcite picks out a scale for @xmath174 which is neither of the order of the big virtuality nor of the order of the small one , but rather is proportional to the geometric mean @xmath309 . the value of the proportionality coefficient @xmath310 in eq . ( [ cmu ] ) is specific to the subtraction scheme ( @xmath295 ) chosen to define the quark loop insertion . the argument given above applies to the factors of @xmath174 that appear in the born approximation to the high energy cross section . the result ( [ energy ] ) , however , also contains a dependence on the running coupling through the higher order factor @xmath311 associated with the solution of the bfkl equation . for the scale in @xmath174 in this case one does not have such a simple argument as the one described above . for the numerical estimates in sec . [ sec : numerical ] we will make the assumption that the same value of @xmath243 also controls the running coupling in the bfkl factor . in sec . [ sec : numerical ] we will check the numerical effect of varying this scale . we now consider the mass @xmath7 that provides the scale for the large energy logarithms @xmath312 ( see eq . ( [ expansion ] ) ) . to estimate this scale , we observe that the rapidity of gluons exchanged in the rungs of the bfkl ladders should lie between the rapidity @xmath313 of the quark @xmath314 ( produced by the photon @xmath129 ) and the rapidity @xmath315 of the quark @xmath67 ( produced by the photon @xmath137 ) . this gives rise to integrations over the rapidity intervals @xmath316 the logarithms of the energy @xmath28 are generated precisely by these integrals . estimating the size of the rapidity intervals thus allows us to estimate the scale @xmath7 . expressing the `` @xmath40 '' and `` @xmath41 '' momentum components of the quark @xmath314 as @xmath317 we write its rapidity as @xmath318 similarly , for the quark @xmath67 we have @xmath319 taking the difference between these rapidities gives @xmath320 the average transverse momenta @xmath321 , @xmath322 carried by the quarks are of the order of the photon virtualities @xmath35 , @xmath36 . for the longitudinal momentum fractions @xmath323 , @xmath324 , we assume a typical maximum value of the order @xmath325 in the high energy region . using these estimates , we obtain @xmath326 we thus identify the scale @xmath327 the transverse - momentum integrations in the factorization formula ( [ ktfac ] ) are dominated by values of @xmath328 of the order of the photon virtualities . ( for the purpose of this section we will take the photon virtualities to be equal , @xmath329 . ) as a result , for sufficiently off shell photons the dominant contribution to the cross section comes from short distances , and the evaluation of eq . ( [ ktfac ] ) gives rise to a finite result in perturbation theory . however , there are limitations on the perturbative treatment that are intrinsic to the bfkl equation . these limitations come from the region of very high @xmath28 . although an accurate understanding of these effects is an open problem @xcite that goes beyond the scope of this work , one can nevertheless make some rough estimates . we discuss them in this section . in order to keep the notation simple , we do not distinguish here between the scales @xmath330 , @xmath331 , and @xmath332 , calling all of these simply @xmath7 . it is known from the structure of the bfkl equation that , even if the incoming @xmath333 , @xmath334 are large , say , @xmath335 , the typical transverse momenta in the gluon ladders contributing to the function @xmath336 ( see eq . ( [ gareprf ] ) ) may diffuse away from @xmath7 as the energy becomes very large . the diffusion coefficient in @xmath337 can be read directly from the asymptotic solution to the bfkl equation ( or , equivalently , from the exponential term ( [ incldiff ] ) in the @xmath104 cross section ) and is given by @xmath338 as a result , the distribution of the transverse momenta in the bfkl ladders is a gaussian in @xmath337 centered around @xmath7 with a width proportional to @xmath339 @xcite . with increasing @xmath28 the distribution broadens , and one becomes sensitive to the region of small transverse momenta . a self - consistency check of the perturbative treatment requires that the contribution from transverse momenta of the order of @xmath340 be suppressed . in order to keep away from momenta of this order one has to have @xmath341 identifying @xmath174 with the strong coupling evaluated at the scale @xmath7 , @xmath342 , one gets @xmath343 for any given @xmath7 , this can be read as an upper bound on the domain of energies @xmath28 in which we expect the perturbative approach based on the bfkl pomeron to be reliable . observe that , for small values of @xmath174 , this is not so stringent a constraint . however , because the bfkl function @xmath246 has a large second derivative at the saddle point , the numerical value of the coefficient @xmath344 is small . therefore , the limit ( [ difflimit1 ] ) may become relevant unless @xmath7 is very large . the bfkl equation is also known to give rise to violation of the unitarity bound at asymptotically large energies . the growth of the cross section predicted by the bfkl equation can not continue indefinitely , and unitarity corrections must arise to slow it down . roughly , these effects are expected to become important when the calculated cross section is bigger than the naive geometrical cross section @xmath345 . a careful discussion may be found in ref . the simplest estimate , @xmath346 , yields , using eq . ( [ saddle ] ) , @xmath347 where we have neglected factors from the term in @xmath348 in eq . ( [ saddle ] ) . assuming , as we did before , @xmath174 to be evaluated at the scale @xmath7 , we can write @xmath349 in the term @xmath181 we collect contributions arising from the factor in the square root in eq . ( [ unitlimit ] ) as well as from the factor @xmath285 in eq . ( [ saddle ] ) . the different functional dependence on @xmath174 in the right hand sides of the inequalities ( [ difflimit1 ] ) and ( [ unitlimit1 ] ) implies that , for small enough values of @xmath174 , the unitarity limit ( [ unitlimit1 ] ) is more stringent than the diffusion limit ( [ difflimit1 ] ) . this suggests that for sufficiently high @xmath7 it should be possible to study unitarization in a purely perturbative context @xcite . on the other hand , the coefficients @xmath344 and @xmath350 are significantly different in size this may make the two bounds ( [ difflimit1 ] ) and ( [ unitlimit1 ] ) rather comparable for moderate values of @xmath7 . in addition , inspection of eqs . ( [ saddle ] ) , ( [ unitlimit ] ) suggests that the term @xmath181 in eq . ( [ unitlimit1 ] ) is not necessarily negligible , and may contribute to push the onset of unitarity corrections further away . as to the impact on experimental studies at future @xmath29 colliders , we observe that unitarity corrections should set in when the cross section has grown to be much larger than the born value @xmath351 . at a future @xmath29 collider one may thus expect to see the rise of the cross section with @xmath258 . possibly , one may see this rise slow as unitarity corrections become important @xcite . if we let @xmath113 be much larger than @xmath114 in eq . ( [ energy ] ) , we obtain a result that describes small @xmath1 deeply inelastic scattering from a transversely polarized photon @xcite whose virtuality @xmath114 is sufficiently large to allow the use of perturbation theory to analyze its decomposition into quarks . the structure function @xmath352 ( which is the same as @xmath353 ) is related to the virtual photon - photon cross section by @xmath354 with @xmath355 thus eq . ( [ energy ] ) gives a leading logarithmic summation for @xmath356 at small @xmath1 : @xmath357 the scale @xmath7 is not fixed by a leading logarithmic calculation . a sensible choice for @xmath7 based on a qualitative argument has been discussed in sec . [ sec : scales ] . for the purpose of the present section we simply leave it undetermined . consider the perturbative expansion of eq . ( [ f1 ] ) , @xmath358 \ , v_1 ( \gamma ) \ , v_1 ( 1 - \gamma ) \hspace*{0.1 cm } . % \ ] ] the functions @xmath263 , @xmath359 and @xmath219 have poles at integer values of @xmath237 . thus this expression contains contributions proportional to @xmath360 times logarithms , @xmath361 times logarithms , and so forth . we extract the leading twist contribution , the part proportional to @xmath360 times logarithms , by rewriting the integral as an integral over a contour @xmath362 that encircles the singularity at @xmath363 plus an integral over a contour from @xmath364 to @xmath365 . the integral over the contour @xmath362 is the leading twist contribution . we discard the integration over the contour from @xmath366 to @xmath365 , which contains the higher twist contributions . thus the leading twist contribution to @xmath356 is @xmath367 \ , v_1 ( \gamma ) \ , v_1 ( 1 - \gamma ) \nonumber\\ & = & { 1 \over ( 2 \pi)^3 \alpha } \ { \lower 6 pt \hbox{\vbox{\hbox{$\rm res$ } \kern -6 pt \hbox{$\scriptstyle \,\gamma = 0 $ } } } } \ , \left ( { { { q}^2_a } \over { { q}^2_b } } \right)^{\gamma } \left [ 1 + { \bar \alpha_s } \ , \chi ( \gamma ) \ln\left(q_a^2 \over x\ , q^2 \right ) + \cdots \right ] \ , v_1 ( \gamma ) \ , v_1 ( 1 - \gamma ) \hspace*{0.1 cm } . % \end{aligned}\ ] ] it is straightforward to determine the perturbative coefficients . the function @xmath368 has a double pole at @xmath363 , as does the function @xmath369 . thus there are three powers of @xmath370 at leading order in @xmath174 , which is @xmath150 since @xmath371 . we find @xmath372 \hspace*{0.2 cm } , \hspace*{0.4 cm } \zeta ( 2 ) \simeq 1.64 \hspace*{0.2 cm}. % \end{aligned}\ ] ] if we restore the summation of the leading logs of @xmath373 , we obtain @xmath374 this is not a simple function . however , one can easily perform the integration numerically . one interesting result is that we observe what used to be called `` precocious bjorken scaling '' . that is , the leading twist approximation begins to be accurate at values of @xmath113 that are not really very large compared to the only other scale in the problem , @xmath114 . we illustrate this in fig . [ twist ] , working at order @xmath150 . we compare the leading twist approximation that applies for @xmath375 , the leading twist approximation that applies for @xmath376 , and the full result . first we define @xmath377 and plot @xmath378 versus @xmath379 . then we define @xmath380 and plot @xmath381 finally , we plot @xmath382 at the leading order in @xmath174 without approximation . we see that the leading twist approximation for @xmath375 is quite good down to @xmath383 , while the leading twist approximation that applies for @xmath384 is quite good down to @xmath385 . in fact , at @xmath386 , both approximations are quite good . a similar behavior is observed if we include higher orders in @xmath174 . ( figtwist.eps width 13 cm ) the qcd result for @xmath387 scattering can be compared with expectations for the structure of the high energy cross section based on traditional regge theory @xcite . in regge theory , to analyze the elastic scattering of particles @xmath181 and @xmath182 one considers the singularity structure of the amplitude @xmath388 in the complex angular momentum plane . the simplest case is a pole in the angular momentum @xmath389 plane located at a position dependent on @xmath172 , @xmath390 . one then obtains the asymptotic behavior @xmath391 for @xmath244 and @xmath172 fixed , and the amplitude takes the factorized form @xmath392 here @xmath393 , @xmath394 are functions of the transferred momentum , associated respectively with the couplings of particles @xmath181 and @xmath182 to the reggeon whose trajectory is @xmath395 . for the case of the @xmath104 total cross section , this would correspond to the structure @xmath396 where we have used the optical theorem to relate the total cross section to the imaginary part of the forward elastic amplitude , and we have let @xmath397 and @xmath398 depend on the photon virtualities in the case of off - shell photons . however , it has been long known , from various phenomenological and theoretical considerations @xcite , that this structure can not be exactly true , and strong - interaction scattering at high energy has to have a more complicated singularity structure than a pole , such as moving or fixed cuts . in this case , one does not expect the factorized form for the cross section to hold . if we now turn to the qcd result ( see eq . ( [ gareprsi ] ) ) , we may ask what kind of singularities the amplitude has in the angular momentum plane . the bfkl pomeron is known to give rise to a ( fixed ) branch point singularity @xcite . to see this , let us consider the moments of the @xmath387 cross section . at leading level , we are allowed to identify the moment @xmath176 with the complex angular momentum @xmath389 ( [ gareprsi ] ) is written in terms of an integral in the complex @xmath237-plane . the integrand has the pole @xmath399 and one factor of @xmath400 for the coupling of the gluon system to the quarks in each photon . thus the integrand has a factorized structure . to understand the angular - momentum singularity structure , one should see what becomes of the pole @xmath401 after @xmath237-integration . for @xmath402 , the @xmath237-integral is well approximated by the residue at the rightmost pole @xmath403 to the left of the integration contour . as we have seen in the previous section , numerically this approximation turns out to be fairly good down to values of @xmath404 just above @xmath405 . in this approximation one gets @xmath406 \;\ ; , \;\;\ ; c_n = - { { v_1 ( { \bar \gamma}_n ) \ , v_1 ( 1- { \bar \gamma}_n ) } \over { { \bar \alpha}_s \ , \chi^{\prime } ( { \bar \gamma}_n ) } } \;\;\;. % \ ] ] the leading pole @xmath407 is determined by the equation @xmath408 . at @xmath409 it has a square - root branch point singularity : @xmath410 correspondingly , the residue @xmath411 is also singular : @xmath412 therefore , the qcd result implies a branch point rather than a simple pole in the angular momentum plane . as a consequence , we do not obtain a regge - factorized form for @xmath413 . it is of interest , however , to see by how much this factorization is violated . we first consider the asymptotic formula ( [ saddle ] ) , obtained by using the saddle point approximation around @xmath414 . in this case , provided the scale @xmath7 is fixed by @xmath415 , as discussed in sec . [ sec : scales ] , and the qcd coupling @xmath174 is fixed , an approximate form of regge factorization is recovered . the piece which violates this factorization in eq . ( [ saddle ] ) is proportional to the square root of a logarithm , and is therefore a slowly varying function . a more substantial source of factorization breaking comes in when one takes into account the correction due to the position of the saddle point drifting away from @xmath416 , see eq.([incldiff ] ) . for the exact leading log result ( [ energy ] ) , a possible way to quantify the deviation from the regge - factorized behavior is to look at the ratio @xmath417 ^ 2 } \over { \sigma_{\gamma^ * \ , \gamma^ * } ( s , q^2_a , q^2_a ) \ , \sigma_{\gamma^ * \ , \gamma^ * } ( s , q^2_b , q^2_b ) } } \hspace*{0.5 cm } . % \ ] ] if regge factorization holds , this quantity should be equal to @xmath405 . on the other hand , from eq . ( [ energy ] ) we see that @xmath418 goes like @xmath419 for @xmath375 , and @xmath420 for @xmath376 . that is , for @xmath35 and @xmath36 sufficiently far apart the regge - factorized form breaks down . ( figratio.eps width 13 cm ) in fig . [ fratio ] , we plot @xmath418 as a function of the ratio of the photon virtualities @xmath421 for different values of the energy . it is interesting to observe that , for typical parameter values , @xmath418 varies by not more than 40% when @xmath421 varies from 0.1 to 10 . we take this as an indication that an approximate regge factorization holds numerically for the exact integral ( [ energy ] ) if @xmath421 is not too large or too small . the calculation of the high energy photon - photon cross section discussed so far is a perturbative calculation , based on the dominance of short distances for large photon virtualities . when the photon virtualities decrease , one goes out of the region of validity of the perturbative approach . as the photons go near the mass shell , the high energy scattering process is expected to become dominated by soft interactions . in this regime one is not able to calculate in qcd , and in order to have a ( phenomenological ) description of the cross section , one rather has to rely on models for strong - interaction scattering based on regge theory . for on - shell photons , the regge factorization hypothesis allows us to relate the photon - photon total cross section to the photon - proton and proton - proton cross sections , as follows @xmath422 assuming the values @xmath423 , @xmath424 , one gets @xmath425 . for virtual photons with small @xmath35 and @xmath36 , the fall - off of the cross section can be estimated from vector meson dominance : @xmath426 as the photon virtualities increase , the cross section , instead of continuing to fall like @xmath427 , should begin to fall more slowly . at large photon virtualities ( of the order of a few @xmath428 , or bigger ) , it should go over to the perturbative scaling behavior in eq . ( [ energy ] ) , @xmath429 at fixed @xmath258 . note that the @xmath430 behavior could not be obtained in the framework of the regge factorization ( [ ppgap ] ) even if one assumed perturbative scaling in each one of the photon cross section factors , that is , even if one assumed @xmath431 . this is the counterpart ( at the level of hadronic cross sections ) of the effect of the deviation from unity observed for the ratio @xmath418 in the previous section ( see eq . ( [ reggeratio ] ) ) . in fact , experimental data on the @xmath432 cross section for large photon virtuality are now available in the region of high energies from the measurements of small-@xmath1 deeply inelastic scattering at hera . the above observation amounts to saying that , even if one used the data for @xmath433 , the relation ( [ ppgap ] ) would not lead to the correct perturbative qcd result for the @xmath104 cross section . in fig . [ loglog ] we show a log - log plot of the curves corresponding to the soft and perturbative formulas for the @xmath7-behavior of the cross section @xcite . for the former , we use eqs . ( [ ppgap])-([vmd ] ) , and for the latter we take the born approximation to eq.([energy ] ) . in this plot we are interested in emphasizing the dependence of the cross section on @xmath7 at fixed @xmath258 . for this reason we limit ourselves to the lowest order formulas , and do not include the higher order summation of the @xmath434 terms that give an enhancement at large energies . it is understood that such high - energy corrections affect both the soft and perturbative curves , giving rise to `` soft - pomeron '' and `` hard - pomeron '' effects in the two cases . ( figloglog.eps width 13 cm ) the region of intermediate values of @xmath7 in fig . [ loglog ] ( @xmath435 of the order of @xmath436 ) is where the transition from the soft - scattering regime to the hard - scattering regime is expected to occur . the mechanism through which this happens is not theoretically under control at present , and one may consider trying to estimate the cross section in this region by interpolating between the two curves . in the next section we will study the prospects for investigating high energy @xmath170 scattering at @xmath2 colliders , and we will discuss which regions in @xmath7 in fig . [ loglog ] can likely be accessed experimentally at lep200 and a future @xmath29 collider . the cross section for high energy virtual photon scattering can be measured in @xmath437 collisions in which the outgoing leptons are tagged . the cross section for the electron - positron scattering process is obtained by folding the @xmath109 cross section with the flux of photons from each lepton . consider the four - fold differential @xmath437 cross section averaged over the angle between the lepton scattering planes , eq . ( [ epaave ] ) . to get an estimate of the rates available to study bfkl effects in virtual photon scattering at @xmath437 colliders of the present and next generation , we integrate this cross section over a region @xmath438 determined by cuts that we discuss below : @xmath439 we choose \i ) @xmath440 , @xmath441 , where @xmath442 is a few gev , in order that the coupling @xmath174 be small , and that the process be dominated by the perturbative contribution ; \ii ) @xmath443 , in order that the high energy approximation be valid . we discuss the parameter @xmath444 below . note that , with these criteria , the photon virtualities @xmath7 lie in a range @xmath445 in which the equivalent photon approximation ( eq . ( [ epaave ] ) ) is expected to work fairly well . on one hand , kinematical corrections of order @xmath446 are suppressed in this range . on the other hand , contributions of order @xmath447 to the @xmath448 splitting process can be neglected . to choose a value for the parameter @xmath444 , we compare the gluon exchange contribution with contributions that are suppressed by a power of @xmath28 @xcite . we consider first the two gluon exchange graph , for which @xmath449 for large @xmath28 . taking the case @xmath450 , we have from fig . [ s0 ] @xmath451 next , we consider the leading order ( electromagnetic ) contribution to @xmath452 , occurring via quark exchange , for which @xmath453 . in appendix [ app : quark ] we report results for this subprocess . for @xmath454 and large enough @xmath28 , the corresponding cross section is well approximated by the formula : @xmath455 demanding that the gluon exchange graph give a larger contribution than the quark exchange graph leads to the requirement @xmath456 for typical perturbative values , @xmath457 , we get @xmath458 . we will therefore use @xmath459 as a standard value for @xmath444 . we note that for @xmath460 , one is surely entitled to drop terms in the gluon exchange graphs that are suppressed by powers of @xmath461 , as we have done . we thus compute the integrated rate @xmath462 in eq . ( [ intrate ] ) using the results given in sec . [ sec : summation ] for the photon - photon cross section , and setting the scales in the running coupling and in the high energy logarithms according to the prescriptions discussed in sec . [ sec : scales ] . the dependence of @xmath462 on the lower bound @xmath463 on the photon virtualities is shown by the `` summed '' curve in fig . [ f500 ] for the energy of a future @xmath29 collider . [ f200 ] shows the cross section for the lep collider at cern operating at @xmath464 . ( fig500.eps width 13 cm ) ( fig200.eps width 13 cm ) the dashed and solid lines in figs . [ f500 ] and [ f200 ] correspond to the result of using , respectively , the born and the summed expressions for the photon - photon cross section . at the values of @xmath465 considered in the figures , summation effects enhance the rates significantly in the range of @xmath442 of a few @xmath466 . as @xmath442 increases , lowest order perturbation theory gets closer and closer to the fully summed prediction , as a result of both @xmath174 becoming small and the phase space closing up for the high energy logarithms . in figs . [ f500 ] and [ f200 ] , we also plot separately the contribution to the cross section from purely transverse photons , that is , the contribution from the term in @xmath467 in eq . ( [ epaave ] ) . we see that this contribution accounts for about three quarters of the full cross section . for values of the cuts @xmath468 , @xmath469 , we find @xmath470 at lep200 energies , and @xmath471 at the energy of a future collider . these cross sections would give rise to about @xmath472 events at lep200 for a value of the luminosity @xmath473 , and about @xmath474 events at @xmath475 for @xmath476 . the choice of the cuts that can realistically be implemented is affected by experimental constraints . in particular , the lowest photon virtualities that can be reached are limited by the angular acceptance of the detector , according to the relation @xmath477 , where @xmath478 is the beam energy , @xmath479 the angle of the tagged lepton , and @xmath1 is the momentum fraction of the emitted photon . in this situation , the value @xmath480 , for which the rates ( [ vallep ] ) , ( [ valnlc ] ) are given , implies detecting leptons scattered through angles down to about @xmath481 at lep200 , which is close to the range of the current luminosity monitors at the lep experiments @xcite . for a future 500 gev collider , @xmath482 corresponds to a minimum angle of about @xmath483 . it appears that working down to such an angle will be difficult but not impossible @xcite . if instead we take @xmath484 , the minimum angle is @xmath485 . then the cross section is about @xmath486 , corresponding to about @xmath487 events . as stated earlier , the numerical results given above depend on the choice of the scales in @xmath174 and in the high energy logarithms that enter the photon - photon cross section . for the calculations described above , we have used the prescriptions given in sec . [ sec : scales ] . different scale choices are possible , and they would affect the predictions at the next - to - leading logarithmic order , which is beyond the present theoretical accuracy . we can use the variation of the results with the scale choices to get an estimate of the uncertainties associated with unknown sub - leading corrections . we can vary the two scales @xmath243 and @xmath7 ( see eqs . ( [ cmu ] ) , ( [ cqu ] ) ) independently . an illustration of this is reported in fig . here we compare the result of fig . [ f500 ] with the curve obtained by multiplying the scale in @xmath174 by a factor of @xmath488 , @xmath489 , and the curve obtained by reducing the scale in the high energy logarithms by a factor of @xmath488 , @xmath490 . the band between these two curves indicates that the uncertainty on the leading logarithmic result is fairly large , and emphasizes the need for improving the accuracy of the calculations at high energy . ( figband.eps width 13 cm ) the plots of the cross section versus @xmath463 shown in figs . [ f500 ] and [ f200 ] illustrate the expected dependence of the photon - photon cross section on the photon virtualities . if we fix @xmath442 we can look at the dependence on the photon - photon c.m . energy @xmath491 . it is useful to use @xmath492 and the photon - photon rapidity @xmath493 as variables instead of @xmath494 and @xmath495 . then we define @xmath496 using eq . ( [ epaave ] ) , we can write @xmath497 as @xmath498 where we omit three similar terms . we see that @xmath499 is very directly related to the @xmath500 cross section . we plot @xmath501 at @xmath502 in fig . [ hats200 ] for @xmath503 and in fig . [ hats500 ] for @xmath504 . here we choose @xmath505 and @xmath506 . in each case , we show a curve for the born level cross section and another for the full bfkl cross section . we also show the cross section arising from the scattering of ( transversely polarized ) photons via quark exchange instead of gluon exchange . we see that , with our choice of cuts , quark exchange scattering is suppressed . ( eeshat2.eps width 13 cm ) ( eeshat5.eps width 13 cm ) for @xmath507 the cross section shows a strong dependence on the cut @xmath508 . with our choice of @xmath509 and with @xmath510 , the cross section is forced to vanish for @xmath511 . as @xmath512 increases , the effect of this cut on the @xmath35 and @xmath36 integrations becomes less and less important . since @xmath513 is independent of @xmath514 at born level , the cross section begins to flatten out as @xmath512 increases to about @xmath515 . for larger values of @xmath512 , the born cross section decreases because of the influence of the photon flux factor @xmath516^{1/2})^2 $ ] . for the summed bfkl curve , the growth of @xmath517 overcomes the effect of the photon flux factor , so that the cross section rises with @xmath512 . the curves for @xmath503 and @xmath518 are similar . the main difference is that at @xmath519 there is more available range for @xmath512 . our plots are for @xmath502 . the available range of @xmath520 is @xmath521 . thus the cross section integrated over @xmath520 goes to zero as @xmath522 . we see from the results presented above that at a future @xmath29 collider it should be possible to probe the effects of pomeron exchange in a range of @xmath7 where summed perturbation theory applies . one should be able to investigate this region in detail by varying @xmath35 , @xmath36 and @xmath523 independently . at lep200 such studies appear to be more problematic mainly because of limitations in luminosity . even with a modest luminosity , however , one can access the region of relatively low @xmath7 in the graph of fig . [ loglog ] if one can get down to small enough angles . this would allow one to examine experimentally the transition between soft and hard scattering . we now move on to the angular distribution for the @xmath159 scattering cross section , and consider the asymmetries @xmath15 , @xmath16 introduced in eq . ( [ dsdphi ] ) . as pointed out in sec . [ sec : polarization ] , @xmath15 is zero at leading order . on the other hand , @xmath16 is given by an equivalent - photon formula in terms of the asymmetry @xmath151 for the @xmath104 scattering process discussed in sec . [ subsec : asym ] . this reads @xmath524 with @xmath151 and @xmath149 being given in eqs . ( [ energyasy ] ) , ( [ energy ] ) . we can use the same cuts discussed earlier in this section to integrate eq . ( [ epaasy ] ) , and thus define @xmath525 where @xmath462 is the integrated rate in eq . ( [ intrate ] ) . performing the integral numerically , we find that the asymmetry @xmath526 is very small . as noted in sec . [ sec : summation ] , the role of the summed bfkl terms is that of reducing the magnitude of the asymmetry with respect to the born order result . at a 500 gev collider , in the range of the angular and energy cuts previously described , we find @xmath527 . we observe that spin effects in photon - photon scattering at high energies are interesting , but the predicted asymmetries are either zero or small . understanding the behavior of high energy hadron reactions from a fundamental perspective within qcd is an important goal of particle physics . as we have shown in this paper , virtual photon scattering @xmath528 at high energies , @xmath529 , provides a remarkable window into pomeron physics . the total cross section can be studied as a function of the space - like mass of each incident projectile . most importantly , the process can be investigated in the regime where the photons both have large virtuality , so that one can use the framework of perturbative qcd . compared to tests of the qcd pomeron behavior based on deeply inelastic structure functions , the measurement of the total cross section for sufficiently off - shell photons is free from the long - distance ambiguities related to the structure of the hadronic target . on the other hand , unlike tests based on associated jet production in lepton - hadron or hadron - hadron collisions , the @xmath530 measurement is fully inclusive and therefore it does not depend on specifying the details of the final state . the scattering of highly virtual photons can be described as the interaction of two incident color singlet @xmath79 pairs of small transverse size interacting through multiple gluon exchange . we have studied this reaction both in the born approximation ( corresponding to two - gluon exchange ) and also with the inclusion of the higher - order summation encompassed by the bfkl equation . the cross section at high energies and large virtuality takes a factorized form in transverse coordinates . however , it does not factorize simply into separate functions of @xmath113 and @xmath114 , which reflects the cut structure of the bfkl pomeron in the complex angular momentum plane . we have also examined the background contribution from quark exchange , a process which is power - law suppressed at high energy . according to this analysis , the @xmath531 cross section falls off at high virtuality only as @xmath532 , where @xmath533 . the rate for sensitive tagged - lepton experiments at high energy @xmath534 or @xmath535 colliders is thus not negligible . in particular it appears that the main features of the perturbative qcd predictions , such as the energy dependence , the factorization properties of the cross section , the scaling laws in @xmath113 , @xmath114 , as well as the polarization and azimuthal correlations can be tested in detail at a high - energy and high - luminosity next linear collider . we have also found that an interesting first look at virtual photon scattering can be obtained from the tagged lepton events measured in the luminosity monitors of present experiments at lep200 . more precisely , we estimate that , in the region of photon virtualities where summed perturbation theory is expected to apply , there should be several hundred events at lep200 , and about @xmath536 events at a future 500 gev collider with an integrated luminosity of @xmath537 . we also find that the enhancement due to bfkl pomeron terms over the born cross section is sizable , and should be visible particularly in the @xmath538-distribution of the cross section , with @xmath523 . the dependence of the cross section on the photon virtualities @xmath35 and @xmath36 is perturbative , and can be predicted in the framework of the bfkl equation . these predictions can be tested by measuring the angles of the recoil leptons . both the case in which the two photon virtualities are varied together ( @xmath539 ) and the case in which they are kept far apart ( @xmath540 ) are of interest . in the second case one gets to observe the structure function of a virtual photon at small bjorken-@xmath1 . the spin structure is rich , but hard to observe . most of the observable cross section comes from the scattering of two transversely polarized photons . for this part of the cross section , there is an asymmetry in the angular distribution of the outgoing leptons , but this asymmetry is less than @xmath541 . in the region of low photon virtualities ( @xmath542 smaller than a few @xmath466 ) , the photon - photon cross section becomes dominated by soft interactions . here one can not use a perturbative analysis . on the other hand , one may explore experimentally at what scales the breakdown of the perturbative result occurs , and how this is connected to the onset of the phenomenological `` soft - pomeron '' behavior . the theory that is available at present is leading logarithmic and therefore is affected by rather large uncertainties . these uncertainties can be parametrized in terms of two mass scales , the transverse scale that controls the running coupling and the longitudinal scale associated with the high energy logarithms . a next - to - leading logarithmic calculation would help determine these scales . such a calculation could make the theoretical predictions much more precise . at the largest values of @xmath514 , new effects related to unitarity and diffusion may become important . if so , an improved theory that deals with these effects would be testable at a future @xmath29 collider . we are grateful to j. bjorken and a. mueller for discussions and for their interest in this work . we thank d. strom for useful advice . this work was supported in part by the united states department of energy grants de - ac03 - 76sf00515 and de - fg03 - 96er40969 . we start with the expression ( [ m1 ] ) for the amplitude corresponding to the graph in fig . [ ftwoglu ] . the overall charge factor in eq . ( [ m1 ] ) is @xmath543 where we have used the color trace @xmath544 . we use the mass shell constraints on the final quarks , @xmath314 and @xmath67 , to eliminate the integrals over their `` @xmath41 '' and `` @xmath40 '' components , respectively , thus obtaining @xmath545 @xmath546 we use the mass shell constraints on the antiquarks to eliminate the integrals over the `` @xmath41 '' and `` @xmath40 '' components of the exchanged momentum @xmath233 , as follows : @xmath547 @xmath548 note that in eqs . ( [ kminus ] ) , ( [ kplus ] ) we have neglected terms of order @xmath549 and @xmath550 with respect to unity , consistently with the high energy approximation . ( [ m1 ] ) can then be rewritten as @xmath551 } \over { \left ( ( p_a + k)^2 + i \ , \varepsilon \right ) \left ( ( p_a - q_a)^2 - i \ , \varepsilon \right ) } } \ , \nonumber \\ & ~ & \times \ , { { { \mbox { \rm tr } } \left [ \ , { \rlap / p}_b \ , \gamma^\alpha \ , ( { \rlap / p}_b - \rlap / k ) \ , { \rlap/\varepsilon}_b \ , ( { \rlap / q}_b - { \rlap / p}_b + \rlap / k ) \ , \gamma^\beta \ , ( { \rlap / p}_b - { \rlap / q}_b ) \ , { \rlap/\varepsilon}_b \right ] } \over { \left ( ( p_b - k)^2 + i \ , \varepsilon \right ) \left ( ( p_b - q_b)^2 - i \ , \varepsilon \right ) } } \;\;. % \end{aligned}\ ] ] we now re - express the denominators and numerators of the amplitude ( [ m1 ] ) in the high energy limit . with the neglect of terms of order @xmath549 and @xmath550 , the denominators take the form @xmath552 @xmath553 and analogously @xmath554 @xmath555 in the numerator , light - cone gluon polarizations are dominant at high energy , and therefore we are led to calculate the product of traces @xmath556 \ ; \nonumber \\ & ~ & \times \ , { \mbox { \rm tr } } \left [ \ , { \rlap / p}_b \ , \gamma^{- } \ , ( { \rlap / p}_b - \rlap / k ) \ , { \rlap/\varepsilon}_b \ , ( { \rlap / q}_b - { \rlap / p}_b + \rlap / k ) \ , \gamma^{- } \ , ( { \rlap / p}_b - { \rlap / q}_b ) \ , { \rlap/\varepsilon}_b \right ] \;. \nonumber % \end{aligned}\ ] ] the result reads @xmath557 substituting eqs . ( [ denoa1])-([denob2 ] ) and ( [ trres ] ) in eq . ( [ m2 ] ) , we obtain the expression ( [ m3 ] ) for the amplitude corresponding to the graph in fig . [ ftwoglu ] . the total cross section is arrived at by adding the contributions from the other graphs according to the replacements described in the text below eq . ( [ m3 ] ) , and dividing by @xmath70 . the result reads @xmath558 } \over { \left [ z_a \ , ( 1-z_a ) \ , q^2_a + ( { { \bf p}}_a + { { \bf k}})^2 \right ] \ , \left [ z_a \ , ( 1-z_a ) \ , q^2_a + { { \bf p}}_a^2 \right ] } } \right . \nonumber \\&&\hspace*{1 cm } \left . - { { \left [ 4 z_a ( 1 - z_a ) ( { \bf{\varepsilon}}_a \cdot { { \bf p}}_a ) ^2\ ; - { { \bf p}}_a^2 \right ] } \over { \left [ z_a \ , ( 1-z_a ) \ , q^2_a + { { \bf p}}_a^2 \right]^2 } } \right\ } \nonumber \\ & ~ & \times \ , \left\ { { { \left [ 4 z_b ( 1 - z_b ) { \bf{\varepsilon}}_b \cdot { { \bf p}}_b \ ; { \bf{\varepsilon}}_b \cdot ( { { \bf p}}_b - { \bf k } ) - { { \bf p}}_b \cdot ( { { \bf p}}_b - { \bf k } ) \right ] } \over { \left [ z_b \ , ( 1-z_b ) \ , q^2_b + ( { { \bf p}}_b - { { \bf k}})^2 \right ] \ , \left [ z_b \ , ( 1-z_b ) \ , q^2_b + { { \bf p}}_b^2 \right ] } } \right . \nonumber \\&&\hspace*{1 cm } \left . - { { \left [ 4 z_b ( 1 - z_b ) ( { \bf{\varepsilon}}_b \cdot { { \bf p}}_b ) ^2\ ; - { { \bf p}}_b^2 \right ] } \over { \left [ z_b \ , ( 1-z_b ) \ , q^2_b + { { \bf p}}_b^2 \right]^2 } } \right\ } . \nonumber % \end{aligned}\ ] ] this coincides with eq . ( [ convsigma ] ) in the text once the explicit expression ( [ capitalg ] ) for @xmath77 is used . using eqs . ( [ m2])-([trplusminus ] ) , the tensor @xmath559 introduced in eq . ( [ curlyg ] ) takes the form @xmath560 } \over { \left [ ( { { \bf p } } + { { \bf k}})^2 + z \ , ( 1-z ) \ , q^2 \right ] \ , \left [ { { \bf p}}^2 + z \ , ( 1-z ) \ , q^2 \right ] } } + \ , symm . \ , \right\ } \;\;\ ; , \nonumber % \end{aligned}\ ] ] where the additive symmetric terms are obtained from the replacements given in sec . [ sec : notations ] . the gluon exchange diagrams discussed in the text provide the dominant contribution to the photon - photon cross section in the high energy limit . they give rise to constant ( in born order ) or logarithmic ( in higher orders ) terms at large @xmath28 in the cross section . this appendix is concerned with quark exchange contributions , which vanish in the large energy limit . we examine quark exchange in order to estimate the energy at which gluon exchange becomes dominant . the leading - order term of quark - exchange type comes from the purely electromagnetic process @xmath561 this contribution is suppressed by a power of @xmath28 at high energies , @xmath562 . to express the cross section for this process , we parametrize the incoming photon momenta as in eq . ( [ qaqb ] ) , and introduce the variables @xmath563 in terms of which the total energy @xmath28 has the expression @xmath564 in the high energy region one has @xmath565 , and @xmath566 as in eq . ( [ qaplusqbminus ] ) . the cross section for the process ( [ qexreac ] ) to order @xmath567 , averaged over the transverse photon polarizations , has the form @xmath568 \hspace*{0.8 cm } , % \ ] ] where @xmath569 and @xmath570 are rational functions of @xmath571 , and are plotted in fig . [ qfun ] versus the variable @xmath572 for different values of the ratio @xmath573 . the @xmath574-dependence of the cross section ( [ sqexunpol ] ) is reported in fig . [ qsig ] for the case of equal virtualities . the cross section vanishes at the kinematic threshold @xmath575 , it has a maximum around @xmath576 , then it falls off and vanishes for @xmath577 ( corresponding to high energy ) like @xmath578 , according to the asymptotic formula @xmath579 the power suppression with @xmath574 at small @xmath574 is the one expected from the exchange of a spin-@xmath416 line in the @xmath172-channel . the logarithmic enhancement is associated with the integration over the region of small angles at the splitting vertex @xmath580 in the limit of small photon virtuality . the behavior of the cross section is qualitatively the same in the case of unequal virtualities . lipatov , sov . j. nucl . * 23 * , 338 ( 1976 ) ; e.a . kuraev , l.n . lipatov and v.s . fadin , sov . jetp * 45 * , 199 ( 1977 ) ; i. balitskii and l.n . lipatov , sov . j. nucl . * 28 * , 822 ( 1978 ) . h. abramowicz , plenary talk at ichep96 ( warsaw , july 1996 ) , in proceedings of the xxviii international conference on high energy physics , eds . z. ajduk and a.k . wroblewski , world scientific , p.53 . d0 collaboration , phys . * 77 * , 595 ( 1996 ) . brodsky , talk at workshop on high energy @xmath29 colliders , brookhaven national laboratory , may 1996 . f. hautmann , talk at ichep96 ( warsaw , july 1996 ) , preprint oits 613/96 , in proceedings of the xxviii international conference on high energy physics , eds . z. ajduk and a.k . wroblewski , world scientific , p.705 . brodsky , f. hautmann and d.e . soper , phys . lett . * 78 * , 803 ( 1997 ) . p. aurenche , g.a . schuler et al . , report on @xmath581 physics " in proceedings of the workshop physics at lep2 " , eds . g. altarelli , t. sj " ostrand and f. zwirner , cern 1996 - 01 , vol.1 , p.291 . mueller , nucl . * b415 * , 373 ( 1994 ) ; a.h . mueller and b. patel , _ ibid . _ * b425 * , 471 ( 1994 ) . i. balitskii , nucl . phys . * b463 * , 99 ( 1996 ) . j. bartels , a. de roeck and h. lotter , phys . lett . b * 389 * , 742 ( 1996 ) . v.m . budnev , i.f . ginzburg , g.v . meledin and v.g . serbo , phys . rep . * 15 c * , 181 ( 1975 ) . low , phys . d * 12 * , 163 ( 1975 ) ; s. nussinov , phys . lett . * 34 * , 1286 ( 1975 ) , phys . d * 14 * , 246 ( 1976 ) ; j.f . gunion and d.e . soper , _ ibid . _ * 15 * , 2617(1977 ) . bjorken , j. kogut and d.e . soper , phys . d * 3 * , 1382 ( 1971 ) . bjorken and j. kogut , phys . d * 8 * , 1341 ( 1973 ) . frankfurt and m. strikman , phys . * 160 * , 235 ( 1988 ) . s. catani , m. ciafaloni and f. hautmann , phys . b * 242 * , 97 ( 1990 ) , nucl . * b366 * , 135 ( 1991 ) ; j.c . collins and r.k . ellis , _ ibid . _ * b360 * , 3 ( 1991 ) . lepage and p.b . mackenzie , phys . d * 48 * , 2250 ( 1993 ) ; s.j . brodsky , g.p . lepage and p.b . mackenzie , _ ibid . _ * 28 * , 228 ( 1983 ) . bjorken , preprint slac - pub-7341 , presented at snowmass 1996 summer study on new directions for high energy physics , e - print archive hep - ph/9610516 . j. bartels and h. lotter , phys . b * 309 * , 400 ( 1993 ) . mueller , nucl . * b437 * , 107 ( 1995 ) . schuler and t. sj " ostrand , zeit . c * 68 * , 607 ( 1995 ) , phys . b * 376 * , 193 ( 1996 ) ; m. gl " uck , e. reya and m. stratmann , phys . d * 51 * , 3220 ( 1995 ) . collins , _ an introduction to regge theory and high energy physics _ , cambridge university press , cambridge , 1977 . opal collaboration , contributed paper pa03 - 007 at ichep96 ( warsaw , july 1996 ) ; j.a . lauber ( opal ) , in proceedings of the xxviii international conference on high energy physics , eds . z. ajduk and a.k . wroblewski , world scientific , p.725 . s. kuhlman et al . , physics and technology of the next linear collider , snowmass 1996 report , e - print archive hep - ex/9605011 . Abstract:

Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.

Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered . Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video . Paper: in particle physics there is a number of well - established principles ( four - dimensional lorentz invariance , renormalizability , gauge symmetries , etc . ) , which are believed to underlie a consistent quantum field theory . all these principles are built into the standard model ( sm ) and its great experimental success is a major justification for their validity . however , in continuing search for the consistent description of an emerging physics beyond the standard model , one often tries to ease some of these criteria . it is then important to make sure that such modifications do not contradict to the observable data , as well as to find observable signatures of a new model . since 1950s @xcite , one uses the gauge symmetry as a main principle for constructing interactions between elementary particles . it is known , however , that in theories with chiral couplings ( i.e. when left and right - handed fermions have different charges with respect to a gauge group ) , one may encounter a situation when the classically conserved gauge current acquires an anomalous divergence at one loop . it is known that such anomalies destroy consistency of the theory , making it non - unitary @xcite . meson into two @xmath0-quanta ( famous abj - anomaly @xcite ) , the baryon and lepton number non - conservation in electroweak theory @xcite , and proton decay in the presence of magnetic monopole @xcite . ] in the standard model , where the couplings of fermions are chiral , charges of all particles can be chosen to ensure the absence of all gauge anomalies @xcite . it may happen , however , that anomaly - free theory looks like an anomalous one below certain energy scale . an example of such a theory would be an electroweak theory at the energy scale below the mass of top - quark . then anomaly is canceled by means of wess - zumino like terms @xcite . among many possible extensions of the standard model there are theories with extra dimensions . their main idea is that our 4-dimensional physics is embedded into a theory in a higher - dimensional space . the standard model fields are then realized as zero modes of a higher - dimensional ones . ( an example is given by an approach , often dubbed _ brane - world _ models , where zero modes of both matter and gauge fields are localized on the 4-dimensional defect , called _ brane _ @xcite ) . once our 4-dimensional world is just a low - energy sector of a bigger theory , the anomaly analysis changes drastically . for example , if a full theory is anomaly free ( say , it is formulated in an odd number of space - time dimensions , where all interactions are vector - like ) , then one has no reason to expect separate anomaly cancellation for the brane fields ( for an explicit example of a brane - world theory with an anomaly on the brane , see @xcite ) . if the theory on the brane is anomalous , then there is a specific type of _ brane - bulk interaction_. it is described by chern - simons - like terms in the low - energy effective action in the bulk . these terms are not gauge invariant in the presence of a brane . therefore , they generate currents , flowing to the brane and thus ensuring the gauge invariance of the full theory . such mechanism is known for a long time and is often called _ anomaly inflow _ it is quite general and appears in many ( physically very distinct ) problems : in quantum hall effect @xcite , dimensional `` brane '' , embedded into @xmath1 dimensional bulk . effective theory in the bulk is described by the @xmath2 chern - simons theory , while on the boundary chiral excitations are localized . conformal field theory describing these excitations was first derived from anomaly consideration @xcite . ] in various field theories with solitonic objects in them ( see e.g. @xcite ) , in string and m - theory @xcite . thus , in the brane - world models a number of questions arises : 1 . [ item:1 ] can one distinguish between a purely 4-dimensional anomaly - free theory , and a theory ( also anomaly - free ! ) in which anomaly is canceled by a small inflow from extra dimensions ? what new observable effects appear in the latter situation ? 2 . [ item:4 ] is it possible to discriminate at low - energies between two different completions of anomalous 4-dimensional effective theory : the one , where anomaly is canceled by inflow from higher dimensions and purely 4-dimensional one , where at higher energies there exist additional particles , which ensure anomaly cancellation ( c.f . [ item:2 ] for generic values of hypercharges the minimal standard model is anomalous . however , for any hypercharges , electrodynamics is still vector - like . can this anomaly nevertheless be observed if this anomalous theory is embedded into a consistent higher - dimensional one ? [ item:3 ] what are experimental constraints for the parameters describing anomaly mismatch ? can the above observations serve as tests in the search for extra dimensions ? in this paper we will attempt to answer the questions [ item:1][item:2 ] . the question [ item:3 ] will be addressed in our next paper @xcite . we would like to note also that in this paper ( as well as in the subsequent paper @xcite ) we study only gauge anomalies . the global chiral anomalies in brane - worlds and corresponding complicated vacuum structure of gauge fields has been discussed in @xcite . we consider a theory on a brane , which is anomalous , while the bulk effective action possesses a chern - simons - like term , responsible for an inflow current . a naive answer to the question ( [ item:1 ] ) then would seem to be the following : as anomaly means gauge current non - conservation , one could expect that particles escape from the brane to extra dimensions . this would look like a loss of unitarity from a purely 4-dimensional point of view , however higher - dimensional unitarity would still be preserved . anomalous current then is simply a flow of such zero - mode particles into the bulk . however , this answer is incorrect . indeed , phenomenologically acceptable brane - world scenario must have a mass gap between zero modes and those in the bulk for both fermions and non - abelian gauge fields @xcite . alternatively , the rate of escape of the matter from a brane must be suppressed in some way ( see e.g. @xcite ) . as a result , the low - energy processes on the brane simply can not create an excitation , propagating in the bulk . if no matter can escape the brane ( or flow onto it ) what is then an inflow current , which should be non - zero even for weak fields causing anomaly in four - dimensional theory ? one seems to be presented with a paradox . we show that in reality the inflow current by its nature is a _ vacuum _ or _ non - dissipative _ current . what we mean by that is the following . usually in electrodynamics one needs to create particles from a vacuum to generate an electric current . such a process is only possible if the available energy is larger than the mass of the particles in the bulk . therefore , weak electric fields on the brane can not induce a current , carried by the bulk modes . however , anomaly inflow current is different . first , it is perpendicular to the field , does not perform a work and thus is not suppressed by the mass of a particle in the bulk . second , such a current is not carried by any real particles excited from the vacuum , being rather a collective effect , resulting from a rearrangement of the dirac sea . this simple observation is in fact very important . essentially , it means that anomaly inflow is a very special type of brane - bulk interaction . namely , we show that in the presence of parallel magnetic and electric fields the latter changes as if photon had acquired mass . as a result the spatial distribution of an electric field changes , in particular it appears outside the plates of the capacitor . similarly , an electric field of an point - like electric charge changes from coulomb to yukawa , when the charge is placed in a magnetic field . the dynamics of the screening of electric charge happens to be quite peculiar and can be shown to lead to the temporary appearance of _ dipole moment _ of elementary particles . at first , we conduct our analysis in @xmath2 gauge theory with the chiral couplings to a matter . one example of such a theory would be an electrodynamics , where left and right - handed particles have different electric charges . the masses of such particles can then be generated only via the higgs mechanism with a charged higgs field , which means that a photon in such a theory becomes massive . a different example is a theory , where axial current comes from a neutrino with a small electric charge . in such theory photon would remain massless . then we analyze the version of the standard model where electric charges of electron and proton differ . we show that although low - energy electrodynamics in this theory is vector - like , there exist effects , similar to those , described above . we would like to stress again that in the theories with extra dimensions there is no immediate reason to expect that four - dimensional anomaly is so small as it follows already from present experimental constraints on the corresponding parameters . the effects which would follow from the existence of an anomaly inflow are observable , but quite peculiar . they do not change drastically physical content of the theory and can be ruled out or constrained only experimentally . thus in those brane - world scenarios , in which _ higher - dimensional _ theory is automatically anomaly free , we are facing yet another fine - tuning puzzle . for distinctness we will often refer to a simple brane - world : the fermions in the background of a kink , realizing a 4-dimensional brane , embedded into a 5-dimensional space as in @xcite ( although main effects are believed to be model - independent ) . we localize gauge fields in a spirit of @xcite , introducing an exponential warp - factor . such warp - factor can arise dynamically because of the fermionic zero modes @xcite . zero modes of both types of fields are separated by mass gaps from the corresponding bulk modes . the paper is organized as follows . we begin section [ sec : qed ] with describing a model of chiral electrodynamics , embedded into a 5-dimensional @xmath2 theory and analyze the microscopic structure of the inflow and details of anomaly cancellation . next , we turn in section [ sec : anom - sm ] to the question of possible extensions of the standard model , such that it would admit an anomaly . we consider one - parameter family of such modifications , with the free parameter being the difference of ( absolute values of ) electric charges of proton and electron . in such model particles also acquire an anomalous dipole moment . we discuss it in the section [ sec : proton ] . we conclude with a discussion of future extensions of this work and some speculations . finally , we would like to stress that in this paper we conducted analysis on the level of classical equations of motion . we discuss some aspects of quantum theory and the validity of our approach in [ sec : disc ] . we start our analysis considering in this section the simplest model which nevertheless catches main effects we are interested in . namely , we will discuss a four - dimensional @xmath2 theory with anomalous chiral couplings to the fermions . such a theory suffers from a gauge anomaly , meaning that on the quantum level its unitarity is lost @xcite . thus it can not describe physics of a 4-dimensional world . however , if one thinks about such an anomalous theory as living on a brane , embedded in a 5-dimensional theory , situation changes . five - dimensional theory is anomaly - free ( all couplings there are vector - like ) and therefore there should exist a special type of interaction ( _ anomaly inflow _ @xcite ) between the theories on the brane and in the bulk , which ensures the unitarity and consistency of the total system . below we demonstrate this mechanism in details . for definiteness we will illustrate our steps by using a concrete model of localization of both fermions and gauge fields . consider the following theory : , greek @xmath3 . we are using _ mostly negative _ metric . our brane is stretched in @xmath4 directions and is located at @xmath5 . we will often use notations @xmath6 instead of @xmath7 and choose polar coordinates @xmath8 in the plane @xmath9.[fn:1 ] ] @xmath10 here @xmath11 is a five - dimensional charge , with the dimensionality of @xmath12 . there are two fermions @xmath13 , interacting with the gauge fields with the different charges : @xmath14 . the fermionic mass terms @xmath15 have a `` kink - like '' structure in the direction @xmath16 , realizing the brane : @xmath17 . as it is well - known ( see e.g. @xcite ) , in this model one has chiral fermion zero modes localized on the brane and a continuous spectrum in the bulk , separated from the zero mode by the mass gap @xmath18 . localization of the zero mode of gauge field is achieved by introduction of a warp - factor @xmath19 . whenever @xmath20 is convergent the system has a zero mode with the constant profile in the 5th direction . warp - factor @xmath19 looks like an @xmath16 dependent coupling constant in the action ( [ eq:1 ] ) , getting infinite as @xmath21 . the lattice study of @xcite has confirmed that the perturbative and non - perturbative analysis of ( [ eq:1 ] ) give the same result for the zero mode up to the energies of the order of the mass gap , at least for @xmath22 reduction . we will assume that this is the case for @xmath23 . depending on the warp - factor , the spectrum of gauge field may be discrete or continuous with or without the mass gap between the zero and bulk modes @xcite . we will often use @xmath24 in which case the zero mode is separated from the bulk continuum by the mass gap @xmath25 @xcite . the nature of the warp - factor @xmath19 is not essential here , it can originate from that of the metric or can arise dynamically , coming from fermionic zero modes @xcite . a low - energy effective action for the gauge fields of the theory ( [ eq:1 ] ) will contain terms , describing interaction between the brane and the bulk : @xmath26 the origin of two last terms is the following . the computation of the fermionic path integral of our theory is separated into the determinant of the 5-dimensional bulk modes of the fermions and that of the 4-dimensional chiral fermionic zero modes . in the former case one can show ( essentially repeating the computations of @xcite ) , that after integrating out the non - zero modes of the fermions , the 5-dimensional effective action of the model ( [ eq:1 ] ) acquires an additional contribution of chern - simons type @xmath27 compared to the usual case @xcite , chern - simons term in models like ( [ eq:1 ] ) acquires additional factor @xmath28 . it is proportional to the difference of the charges of the five - dimensional fermions and depends on the profile of the domain wall . in the limit of an infinitely thin wall and the large fermionic mass gap @xmath29 . below we sketch the derivation of this function . terms like generically appear in the theories with anomaly inflow @xcite . in situations with more than one extra dimension an effective action will have similar structure , with the fifth coordinate being suitably chosen radial coordinate . such terms can also appear for non - abelian fields . evaluating of the determinant of the 4-dimensional dirac operator in the background of the gauge field ( and , possibly , higgs field , see below ) , we get @xmath30 . let us denote the _ 4-dimensional _ charges of the left and right - handed fermionic zero modes as @xmath31 and @xmath32 . they are proportional to their 5-dimensional counterparts @xmath33 and @xmath34 and thus @xmath35 . as a result @xmath30 is _ not gauge invariant_. the manifestation of this fact is the anomalous divergence of the gauge current at one - loop level : @xmath36 the action ( [ eq:3 ] ) is also non - gauge invariant , and the variations of these two terms cancel each other ( as we will demonstrate below ) . divergence of the current ( [ eq:5 ] ) is proportional to the transversal profile of the fermion zero modes . in this paper we will be interested in the characteristic energy scales much less than the mass gap of the gauge fields @xmath25 , which is in turn much less than the fermionic mass gap : @xmath37 . therefore the profile of the fermion zero mode can be approximated by the delta - function @xmath38 , which appears in eq . ( [ eq:5 ] ) . equations of motion coming from the action ( [ eq:2 ] ) are : @xmath39 and @xmath40 in the right hand side of eq . ( [ eq:6 ] ) there is a current of the zero modes @xmath41 ( we will omit brackets @xmath42 from now on ) . the variation of the effective action @xmath30 with respect to the @xmath43 is equal to zero .. zero modes of @xmath44 and @xmath45 have definite 4-dimensional chirality . therefore @xmath46 and analogously for @xmath45 . ] the current @xmath47 in the right hand side of eqs . ( [ eq:6])([eq:7 ] ) is defined via @xmath48 note that in the right hand side of eq . ( [ eq:8 ] ) there is a term , proportional to the derivative of @xmath28 . this term is non - zero only in the vicinity of the brane ( as @xmath49 is proportional to the delta - function of @xmath16 ) . thus , essentially it corresponds to the modification of definition of the brane current @xmath50 ( [ eq:5 ] ) . this additional term is responsible for making anomaly of the zero modes _ gauge invariant _ @xcite , as the inflow current ( [ eq:5 ] ) is always gauge invariant in the @xmath2 case . thus , terms proportional to @xmath49 correspond to the local counterterms , shifting between the _ covariant _ and _ consistent _ anomalies @xcite . in what follows we will always consider covariant anomaly of the brane modes and ignore terms in the bulk , proportional to the @xmath49 . the chern - simons current @xmath51 is a non - dissipative one as it does not perform a work due to its antisymmetric structure . in addition to that it does not depend on the mass of the fermions in the bulk and hence is not suppressed by the mass gap . if a gauge field has four - dimensional components with @xmath52 , there exists a current @xmath53 , flowing onto the brane from the extra dimension @xcite . trivial consequence of eqs . ( [ eq:6])([eq:7 ] ) is @xmath54 it means that if coefficients in front of the @xmath55 and @xmath30 were not correlated , by virtue of ( [ eq:5 ] ) the solutions of eq . would be field configurations with @xmath56 . however , to preserve the gauge - invariance in the action the divergences of currents in the left hand side of should be equal . from the definition ( [ eq:8 ] ) one can see that @xmath57 comparing ( [ eq:10 ] ) with eq . ( [ eq:5 ] ) we can choose the coefficient of @xmath58 of the function @xmath28 so that the current @xmath47 cancels the anomalous divergence of the current @xmath41 and make the theory ( [ eq:2 ] ) consistent and gauge - invariant . namely @xmath59 microscopical calculations of @xmath28 confirm that this is indeed the case . the relation between 5-dimensional fields @xmath60 , entering eqs . ( [ eq:6])([eq:7 ] ) and the 4-dimensional ones is given by : @xmath61 here @xmath62 is a _ four - dimensional @xmath2 coupling constant _ , related to the 5-dimensional one via @xmath63 ( to see that , one should substitute @xmath60 , independent on the 5th coordinate , into the kinetic term in ( [ eq:2 ] ) and integrate over @xmath16 ) . field @xmath64 satisfies the 4-dimensional maxwell equations @xmath65 with the current in the right hand side given by : @xmath66 this current is conserved : @xmath67 as a consequence of eqs . ( [ eq:7 ] ) and ( [ eq:9 ] ) . in the theory ( [ eq:1 ] ) fermionic zero modes on the brane are massless . to make this model more realistic , we should add mass to these zero modes as well . the only way to make the electro - dynamics anomalous is to take left and right moving fermions with different electric charges . thus one can only introduce a mass term via the higgs mechanism with an electrically charged higgs field , i.e. to add the following term to the bulk lagrangian ( [ eq:1 ] ) : @xmath68\:,\ ] ] where @xmath69 and the higgs mass @xmath70 is negative at @xmath71 and tends to the positive constant in the bulk , as @xmath72 ( figure [ fig : higgs ] ) . thus higgs field has a non - trivial profile @xmath73 , with @xmath74 and @xmath75 at @xmath76 . so the symmetry is restored far from the domain wall . the higgs mass far from the brane is taken to be large , so that the scalar is localized on a brane . the higgs field has an expectation value , which on the brane is @xmath77 ( we take the scalar s self - coupling @xmath78 to be large , so that higgs mass @xmath79 is much bigger than @xmath80 yukawa mass of the fermions on the brane ) . as the higgs field is charged , the photon should acquire mass for @xmath81 ) . to determine it exactly one needs to find the spectrum of the theory with action given by the sum of ( [ eq:1 ] ) and ( [ eq:16 ] ) , but for us it is only important that @xmath82 , where parameter @xmath58 was defined in ( [ eq:11 ] ) . in section [ sec : anom - sm ] we will analyze the consequences of anomaly inflow in the standard model , where yukawa mass of the fermions does not necessarily lead to the massive photon . dynamics of the higgs field @xmath83 simplifies in the limit of the large ( compared to the energy scale of the processes on the brane ) vev @xmath84 . in this limit it is convenient to work in the _ unitary gauge _ , in which the phase of the higgs field is fixed ( e.g. via @xmath85 ) . in the regions of space where the gauge field has non - trivial @xmath60 , it is impossible to have @xmath86 @xcite . however , variations of the @xmath87 are suppressed by the higgs s vev , we can neglect them and take @xmath88 on the brane . now the vector field is massive and longitudinal component becomes a physical degree of freedom . from equations of motion one can obtain the following condition on the field @xmath89 : @xmath90 eq . ( [ eq:17 ] ) is just an expression of the gauge invariance of the total action . divergences of @xmath91 and @xmath47 precisely cancel each other ( [ eq:9 ] ) . therefore eq . ( [ eq:17 ] ) implies that @xmath92 once we have added the mass to the zero mode fermions , we can integrate them out and obtain effective action @xmath30 ( [ eq:2 ] ) , written in unitary gauge . the variation of this action with respect to @xmath93 gives gauge invariant current @xcite : @xmath94 we will often call this current _ the dhoker - farhi current _ denote it @xmath95 . in the unitary gauge eq . ( [ eq:19 ] ) becomes @xmath96 this current has a divergence , equal to that of the chern - simons current ( @xmath97 ) : @xmath98 a purpose of this work is to explore in details this anomaly cancellation mechanism . namely , _ what constitutes the inflow _ ? zero modes of fermions are confined to the brane and can not propagate in the bulk , while bulk modes are massive and can not be excited at low energies . another question is _ whether 4-dimensional observer can distinguish _ between an anomaly - free , intrinsically 4-dimensional theory and 5-dimensional ( anomaly - free ! ) brane - world theory , in which a very small anomaly of the 4-dimensional fermions on the brane is canceled by an inflow from the bulk . as we have seen , on the microscopic level anomaly inflow is a collective effect of reorganization of the dirac see of the massive fermions in the bulk in the presence of a field configuration with non - zero @xmath99 . the simplest way to obtain non - zero @xmath100 is to choose both @xmath101 and @xmath102 to be parallel to each other and constant ( in @xmath103 ) in some region on the brane . we realize such fields by two parallel infinite plates in the vacuum , separated in the direction @xmath104 by the distance @xmath105 a capacitor with initial charge densities @xmath106 on plates , placed in the magnetic field . magnetic field is created by an ( infinite in the @xmath107-direction ) solenoid with the radius @xmath108 . before these fields are turned on , the vacuum structure on the classical level is unchanged and there is no difference with non - anomalous theory . also , the effects of anomaly are controlled by the parameter @xmath58 , which is naturally assumed to be very small . that is why the most natural setup to study the anomaly inflow is qualitatively the following . we assume that the vacuum current is zero and an electric field is equal to its value for non - anomalous theory . then we turn on a parallel magnetic field and expect that small ( perturbative in @xmath58 ) inflow currents start to change the charge distribution on the brane trying to compensate the anomalous field configuration . according to this picture , in section [ sec : perturb ] we will choose initial condition describing the absence of anomalous vacuum structure and will consider an initial stage of inflow ( linear in time ) perturbatively , in the first order in @xmath58 . we will see , however , that this naive approach does not work and perturbation theory breaks down . therefore , we will have to study the full non - linear equations non - perturbatively in @xmath58 . then , as we will show in section [ sec : final - state ] , a non - analytic in @xmath58 static solution exists . the properties of this solution will define the main observable effect of the anomaly inflow , studied in the present paper . it is , nevertheless , instructive to study the dynamical problem to understand qualitatively how this state is formed . as we will see in section [ sec : old - part ] , from the 4-dimensional point of view the picture of the inflow given by perturbation theory is qualitatively correct and knowing the non - perturbative static solution one can define it properly . as in general we expect the parameter @xmath58 to be extremely small , we will try to solve the maxwell equations ( [ eq:6])([eq:7 ] ) by perturbation theory in @xmath58 . to find linear in time corrections to the fields at @xmath109 , we should specify the initial values of all fields . our initial conditions should satisfy the gauss constraint , @xmath110 , @xmath111 and choose polar coordinates @xmath8 in the plane of the capacitor @xmath9 ( c.f . footnote [ fn:1 ] ) . ] @xmath112 where @xmath113 and @xmath114 are expressed in terms of components @xmath115 and are both proportional to the @xmath58 ( c.f . ( [ eq:8 ] ) and ( [ eq:20 ] ) correspondingly ) . because we have added a charged higgs field ( [ eq:16 ] ) and the electrodynamics became massive , specifying initial values of @xmath115 is not enough and one should also set values of the gauge potential at @xmath109 . we choose all but @xmath116 components @xmath117 initially equal to zero ( see appendix [ app : linear ] for details ) . the time derivatives of @xmath117 can then be extracted knowing electric fields at @xmath109 and using condition ( [ eq:18 ] ) . in this paper we restrict our analysis only to such initial conditions . in general initial conditions on the vector field @xmath117 will depend on how one turns on electric and magnetic fields . corresponding analysis ( similar to that of @xcite ) will be presented elsewhere . in addition to these initial condition we will choose as a zeroth approximation such configuration of electromagnetic fields @xmath115 that @xmath118 . the reason for that is as follows : from ( [ eq:8 ] ) one has @xmath119 . in the absence of anomaly @xmath120 would be equal to zero for our configuration of charges . therefore , it is natural to assume that initially @xmath120 is equal to zero in the full theory as well . initial conditions @xmath121 and @xmath122 mean that we should prepare an electric field configuration , satisfying 5-dimensional gauss constraint in the theory with @xmath123 ( we will mark these fields by the symbol @xmath124 ) . then we find ( perturbative ) corrections to these fields due to anomalous current and analyze effects arising on the initial ( linear ) stage of inflow . the details of the computations can be found in appendix [ app : naive ] , here we only quote the main results . with our choices for the fields @xmath125 , initially only time component of the dhoker - farhi current changes with time ( see appendix [ app : naive ] ) : @xmath126 if the theory were purely four - dimensional , eq . ( [ eq:35 ] ) would have described the rate of anomalous particle production , essentially the measure of non - unitarity of the theory . in the 5-dimensional brane - world the interpretation of eq . ( [ eq:35 ] ) is quite different . namely , one should not think about the inflow current , as `` bringing particles to the brane '' . this is obvious as all the light ( zero mass ) particles are confined to the brane and do not propagate in the bulk , while the fermions , which live in the bulk are too massive to be excited at low energies . thus , inflow current ( [ eq:8 ] ) is essentially a _ vacuum current _ redistribution of the particle density without actual creation of the charge carriers . this fact can be checked by the direct microscopic computations of the vacuum average of @xmath127 in the full theory ( [ eq:1 ] ) . the divergence @xmath128 is non - zero only in the position of the brane @xmath129 and thus modifies the charge density only there ( which is reflected by the delta - function in eq . ) . one may think of the effect of the vacuum current as of a dielectric susceptibility of the vacuum of four - dimensional theory , embedded in the 5-dimensional space - time . notice , that since there is no @xmath113 , eq . ( [ eq:35 ] ) means that _ the total electric charge density changes with time_. if the charge density changes in the finite volume on the brane , this leads to the change of both @xmath130 and @xmath131 . ( if initial field @xmath130 and @xmath132 uniformly filled all the brane and were localized in @xmath133 direction , then the appearance of the anomalous density would not lead to the change of the @xmath107 component of the electric field . the change in @xmath131 would be unobservable , since this field is antisymmetric in @xmath133 and so @xmath134 ) . for the case when @xmath100 is non - zero only in the finite volume on the brane we explicitly find the change in @xmath130 by solving maxwell equations ( [ eq:6])([eq:7 ] ) : @xmath135 now one can see that _ our perturbation theory approach has a problem_. indeed , although @xmath136 is proportional to @xmath58 , it grows in @xmath133 as @xmath137 while @xmath138 decays as @xmath139 . the correction term ( [ eq:109 ] ) becomes larger than @xmath138 at @xmath140 . ( [ eq:109 ] ) gives correction to the _ 5-dimensional _ electric field . the corresponding 4-dimensional field is obtained via ( [ eq:12 ] ) . as shown in appendix [ app : naive ] , the integral in ( [ eq:12 ] ) is saturated at @xmath141 where characteristic @xmath142 . therefore in the physically relevant region @xmath143 thus , we see that the naive form of perturbation theory does not work . it means that something was wrong with our qualitative picture of the inflow and that we have to study full equations non - perturbatively . we have seen in the previous section that effects , caused by anomaly inflow are non - perturbative . as the full system of non - linear maxwell equations is too complicated to solve exactly , we will compute a static solution . this means that we do not study how anomaly inflow modifies the initial fields , but rather describe a final state of the inflow . we will consider the simplest case : a capacitor with infinite plates , when these equations are reduced to the @xmath1 ones . below we will only sketch the computations , for details reader should refer to appendix [ sec : final - state - compute ] . we will return to the perturbation theory in the section [ sec : old - part ] . for static solution we can describe the electric field in terms of the electro - static potential @xmath144 : @xmath145 , @xmath146 . then the gauss constraint can be re - written as ( see appendix [ sec : final - state - compute ] for details ) : @xmath147 where @xmath148 is a 3-dimensional laplacian in the coordinates @xmath149 . components @xmath150 can all be expressed via single function @xmath116 ( because we choose all the gauge connection to be @xmath151 independent ) . the maxwell equation ( [ eq:6 ] ) for @xmath152 becomes then an equation for @xmath116 : @xmath153 we will analyze this solution as follows . first , we notice that if the right hand side of eq . ( [ eq:46 ] ) were identically zero , then there would be a solution @xmath154 , @xmath155 , @xmath156 . then one can easily find an explicit solution of eq . ( [ eq:45 ] ) ( under these assumptions gauss law becomes identical to that of the @xmath1 dimensional case with the point - particle as the source ) . after that we show that corrections to the found solutions of eqs . ( [ eq:45])([eq:46 ] ) due to the non - zero right hand side of ( [ eq:46 ] ) are of the order @xmath157 . note , that potentially the first terms in the right hand sides of both ( [ eq:45 ] ) and ( [ eq:46 ] ) can be non - perturbative , as they are proportional to the @xmath137 . this is precisely why the naive perturbation theory of the section [ sec : perturb ] did not work . after the fourier transform in @xmath149-directions : ( @xmath158 ) and a substitution @xmath159 equation ( [ eq:45 ] ) becomes in eq . ( [ eq:47 ] ) as compared to ( [ eq:45 ] ) . @xmath114 is proportional to @xmath160 , and therefore it can be treated perturbatively , as any function which is proportional to @xmath58 and does not have a growing profile in @xmath133 direction . ] @xmath161 where operator @xmath162 does not depend on @xmath163 : @xmath164 let us denote the eigen - function of ( [ eq:48 ] ) by @xmath165 and its eigen - values by @xmath166 : @xmath167 . one can show ( see appendix [ sec : final - state - compute ] ) that @xmath168 ( recall that @xmath169 is a _ four - dimensional coupling constant _ ( [ eq:13 ] ) ) . notice that @xmath170 depends only on the four - dimensional quantities ( electro - magnetic coupling constant @xmath169 and the magnetic field @xmath171 measured by a 4-dimensional observer ) ! the eigen - function for the eigen - value @xmath172 is given by @xmath173 here @xmath174 is a modified bessel function of the second kind ` . ] and @xmath175 is a normalization constant . the solution of eq . ( [ eq:45 ] ) can be easily found for any charge distribution @xmath176 . for the point - particle in the uniform magnetic field an electrostatic potential , created by the particle will be of the yukawa form : @xmath177 where the mass @xmath170 depends on the anomaly coefficient and the magnetic field @xmath132 ( [ eq:49 ] ) . the profile of the solution ( [ eq:58 ] ) in the @xmath133 direction @xmath178 is proportional to @xmath179 ( see also appendix [ sec : final - state - compute ] ) : @xmath180 ( where in the last equality we assumed that @xmath181 ) . function @xmath178 is sharply localized in the region @xmath182 indeed , asymptotics of the bessel function @xmath174 is @xmath183 for @xmath184 , therefore outside the specified region potential @xmath144 decays as an exponent @xmath185 . thus , the function @xmath186 exponentially decays in @xmath133 direction on the scale proportional to the @xmath187 and depending on @xmath58 ( potentially very small ) only logarithmically , while the scale @xmath188 of the exponential decay of the potential in the @xmath107 direction does not depend on @xmath25 and is proportional to the @xmath189 . as a result @xmath190 for any physically plausible values of magnetic field @xmath171 . notice , that the function @xmath174 is non - regular for small @xmath191 and the same is true for @xmath178 as a function of @xmath58 . now it is easy to show that equation ( [ eq:46 ] ) for @xmath116 only gives small corrections to the constant magnetic field @xmath171 . indeed , the right hand side of eq . ( [ eq:46 ] ) is proportional to the @xmath157 . in case of eq . ( [ eq:45 ] ) such term was non - perturbative , because it was divided by @xmath192 and thus could get arbitrarily large as @xmath139 . in the case at hand , however , the right hand side is proportional to the @xmath193 . as @xmath144 decays in @xmath133 much faster than @xmath192 , this term is always small and therefore all the corrections to the @xmath194 are of the order @xmath157 . similarly , there are corrections to the @xmath195 , which are of the order @xmath196 due to the presence of dhoker - farhi term @xmath114 . to summarize , we see from eq . ( [ eq:58 ] ) that anomaly inflow causes screening of an electric charge with the screening radius being @xmath188 . this means , that total amount of anomalous charge , which inflows on the brane is equal to an initial electric charge @xmath197 of a particle . similarly to eq . ( [ eq:58 ] ) , in case of capacitor with infinite plates one can see that for @xmath198 the expression @xmath144 is given by an electro - static potential created by two infinite charged plates in 3 spatial dimensions for a _ massive _ electric field with the mass @xmath170 : @xmath199 ( i.e. @xmath200 ) . constructing 4-dimensional electric field from ( [ eq:51 ] ) we get : @xmath201 } \ : . \ ] ] here @xmath202 is a value of 4-dimensional field , which would be created between the plates of the capacitor in the theory without anomaly @xmath203 . in the presence of anomaly distribution of an electric field changes . inside a capacitor it diminishes : @xmath204 but appears outside : @xmath205 as one can see , inside the capacitor the field is smaller , than would be in the absence of anomaly , however , it appears outside the capacitor . if @xmath58 is such that @xmath206 , the field outside the capacitor ( for @xmath207 ) is almost constant , given by @xmath208 the expression ( [ eq:54 ] ) is the main result of this paper . it shows that effect of anomaly inflow leads to the drastic change of the electromagnetic fields on the brane . namely , in the presence of magnetic field , the electric field behave as if photon has become massive , with the mass @xmath170 dependent on the magnetic field . the same is true for a point - like charge , placed in magnetic field ( [ eq:58 ] ) . in particular , the electric field , created by an infinite capacitor , appears outside its plates ( eq . ( [ eq:57 ] ) ) . as we will argue in our next paper @xcite , this effect can be used as a signature of extra dimensions . although we have already obtained a non - perturbative final state , we would still like to see how this solution is formed . therefore let us come back to the dynamical problem . although the naive perturbation theory did not work , the parameter @xmath58 is very small , and it is natural to assume that if we will choose a more appropriate zeroth approximation , we can describe time - dependent effects of initial stage of anomaly inflow perturbatively . part of the wave - function @xmath209 plus perturbative series in @xmath210 in a pre - exponential term . ] the results of the previous section explain why the naive perturbation theory of section [ sec : perturb ] did not work . essentially , this is due to the fact that the solution in the bulk is non - perturbative in @xmath58 . therefore , we will try to find a dynamic solution ( linear in time ) , based on the non - perturbative zeroth approximation , derived from the static solution ( [ eq:51 ] ) . at first sight solution ( [ eq:51 ] ) differs drastically from electric fields of section [ sec : perturb ] . for example , the component @xmath211 and a charge density distribution are symmetric with respect to an inversion @xmath212 , while the correction @xmath136 to an electric field is anti - symmetric . this is due to the fact that the full ( time - dependent ) maxwell equations do not possess such symmetry ( unlike the equations for the static case ) . thus , for example , the point particle can have a ( time - dependent ) dipole moment at initial stage of anomaly inflow ( see below , section [ sec : dipole - moment ] ) , while such a dipole moment will be absent in the static solution ( [ eq:58 ] ) . additionally , static solution behaves as @xmath213 for @xmath214 outside the region ( [ eq:53 ] ) around the brane , which is very different from the @xmath133 dependence of the fields @xmath138 and @xmath215 in section [ sec : perturb ] , which had a power law decay ( see @xcite ) . however , we can still develop a perturbative ( in time ) expansions for electric fields . as a zeroth approximation we will take functions @xmath138 and @xmath215 , whose profiles in @xmath133 direction is @xmath178 and @xmath216 correspondingly ( that is they go to zero exponentially fast for @xmath217 ) , unlike functions @xmath138 and @xmath215 in the section [ sec : perturb ] ) . namely , we express @xmath215 and @xmath138 via a function @xmath218 such that @xmath219 and @xmath220 . the function @xmath218 will be chosen in the form ( [ eq:51 ] ) : @xmath221 where @xmath202 is a value of a _ 4-dimensional electric field _ between the plates of the capacitor . we stress that @xmath218 is just an auxiliary function , which is not related to the component @xmath222 of the gauge field . the initial field @xmath223 is created by an infinite capacitor in @xmath224 dimensions . the reason for such a choice is the following . the relaxation time in the bulk is determined by the mass of the fermions there ( fermionic mass gap ) . this mass is much larger than any other scale in our theory , therefore one can think that the bulk fermions form an incompressible fluid and have a relaxation time @xmath225 much faster than any time scale in the theory . therefore the profile in @xmath133 direction settles over the time of turning on of a magnetic fields . as the magnetic field @xmath132 is already taken at its stationary value in our problem , we also take static profile in @xmath133-direction for the electric fields . on the contrary , the relaxation in @xmath107-direction is of the order @xmath226 , which is incomparably smaller than the afore - mentioned scale . the difference of these two scales justifies an ansatz ( [ eq:59 ] ) . we will find corrections to the electric field ( [ eq:59 ] ) for the times @xmath227 . the resulting expression has @xmath133 dependence of the form @xmath228 ( see appendix [ app : correct ] for details ) . thus , it will decay in the same region , as a full solution and a problems of the perturbation theory of the section [ sec : perturb ] are removed . in the linear stage the result of the anomaly inflow is the following . the anomalous electric density appears between the plates of the capacitor : @xmath229 where @xmath171 is the value of magnetic field @xmath230 in the center of the solenoid . this means that the _ capacitor acquires anomalous electric charge , linearly changing with time_. this implies an existence of the stationary 4-dimensional current @xmath231 , given by @xmath232 ( where @xmath222 is given by ( [ eq:59 ] ) ) . this picture has an apparent contradiction with causality , as a non - zero current @xmath233 instantaneously appears at spatial infinity at @xmath109 . this is due to our choice of initial conditions : the magnetic field @xmath234 was turned on instantaneously in the whole space . in reality there is a transitional period , depending on the speed with which we are turning on magnetic field , and the current will appear at infinity only when magnetic field will reach it . we see that in accord with our qualitative expectations , electric charge is initially accumulating in the region of space where initial @xmath235 . such a charge of course creates an electric field outside the plates of the capacitor . for @xmath236 and @xmath237 the electric field outside of the capacitor behaves as @xmath238 comparing correction @xmath239 with @xmath202 , we see that the linear stage of anomaly inflow is valid for the time @xmath240 where @xmath241 we discussed in section [ sec : observ - inflow ] the simplest possible way to create configuration of electro - magnetic field with parallel @xmath101 and @xmath102 and therefore observe effects of anomaly inflow . actually , the electro - magnetic field created by any charged particles with spin has non - zero @xmath242 . as we will presently see , anomaly inflow in this case leads to an appearance of an anomalous dipole moment of the particle . to estimate this effect , we start from the quasi - classical expressions for electric and magnetic fields , created by a particle with an electric charge @xmath62 and magnetic moment @xmath243 @xmath244 thus , in the region of the space where expression ( [ eq:77 ] ) is non - zero , inflow current ( analogous to that of section [ sec : observ - inflow ] ) creates non - zero anomalous charge density @xmath245 . such density will be positive in one half of the ball , surrounding a particle , and negative in another one . as a result , the total charge of the particle does not change . however due to the inflow any particle acquires an anomalous _ electric dipole moment _ : @xmath246 ( here @xmath247 is a compton radius of the particle , given by @xmath248 in our system of units ) . charge density @xmath245 is given by ( [ eq:65 ] ) with electric and magnetic fields estimated by @xmath249 and @xmath250 . substituting all these values into eq . ( [ eq:78 ] ) we get : @xmath251 i.e. as a consequence of anomaly inflow a particle acquires a dipole moment , which has the absolute value growing with time . notice , however , that this result was obtained in perturbation theory as a linear in time approximation ( section [ sec : old - part ] ) . it is valid for @xmath252 where @xmath170 is given by an analog of formula ( [ eq:49 ] ) for @xmath253 : @xmath254 for times , much bigger that this characteristic time , field configuration around the particle approaches static solution . as it has already been discussed ( see the beginning of the section [ sec : old - part ] ) , static equations are symmetric with respect to inversion @xmath255 , therefore , there can not be any dipole moment for @xmath256 . electric field configuration will be significantly modified from the usual coulomb to yukawa form ( similar to ( [ eq:58 ] ) ) at the distances larger than @xmath188 , with @xmath170 given by ( [ eq:98 ] ) . this means that the electric charge of the particle _ gets completely screened _ and the total amount of an anomalous charge which appeared on the brane is equal to the charge of the particle . in this section we apply the logic of section [ sec : qed ] to the standard model . indeed , if the standard model fields are localized on a brane in a 5-dimensional world , there is no apparent reason to expect a separate anomaly cancellation for them . let us try to see what kind of new effects we should expect for the standard model if 4-dimensional anomaly cancellation condition is not imposed and there is an inflow from extra dimensions . we will see that such effects do exist and discuss experimental restrictions for corresponding parameters . for simplicity we consider the electroweak @xmath257 theory with only one generation of fermions ( the addition of extra generations does not change the analysis ) . the action for the @xmath258 and @xmath2 gauge fields is similar to that in eq . ( [ eq:1 ] ) . the warp - factor @xmath19 is such that there is a zero mode , localized on the brane . we also add a higgs @xmath83 field , which is an @xmath258 doublet . as in section [ sec : qed5d ] its mass @xmath70 is negative at @xmath71 and tends to the positive constant in the bulk as @xmath72 ( figure [ fig : higgs ] ) . therefore it has a non - trivial profile @xmath73 , with @xmath74 and @xmath75 at @xmath259 . so the @xmath257 symmetry is broken down to @xmath260 on the brane and restored far from it . therefore the vector boson acquires mass @xmath261 which becomes zero at large @xmath262 . , as such a constant would have removed the zero mode from the spectrum . indeed , in this paper we consider such warp - factors @xmath19 that there is a mass - gap @xmath25 between the zero mode and the modes in the bulk . therefore no state with the mass @xmath263 can exist away from the brane . ] we also add fermions in the bulk , charged with respect to @xmath257 . their zero modes are localized on the brane with mass gap @xmath18 much larger than that of the gauge fields . we consider the extension of the standard model in which the @xmath264 hyper - current @xmath265 becomes anomalous @xmath266}{16\pi^2 } \epsilon^{\mu\nu\lambda\rho}\cf_{\mu\nu}\cf_{\lambda\rho } + \frac{{\mathop\mathrm{tr}}[y_l]}{16\pi^2 } \epsilon^{\mu\nu\lambda\rho}{\mathop\mathrm{tr}}g_{\mu\nu } g_{\lambda\rho}\ : . \ ] ] here @xmath267 is a @xmath268 field strength of the @xmath2 field @xmath269 ( hyper - photon ) : @xmath270 ; @xmath271 is an @xmath258 non - abelian field strength , @xmath272 and @xmath273 are @xmath268 and @xmath258 coupling constants correspondingly . the first term in comes from the diagram fig . [ fig : anomaly]b and is proportional to the sum of cubes of hypercharges of _ all _ particles . the hypercharges in the standard model are chosen in such a way that @xmath274={\mathop\mathrm{tr}}[y_l ] = { \mathop\mathrm{tr}}[y]=0 $ ] @xcite . we choose a one - parameter extensions of this model , in which @xmath275=-\frac12{\mathop\mathrm{tr}}[y_l]=\kappa_0 $ ] . the second term comes from the diagram fig . [ fig : anomaly]a , with one @xmath268 and two @xmath258 vertices . along with anomaly there is also a non - conservation of @xmath258 current in the background @xmath2 and @xmath258 fields ( its coefficient is proportional to the same diagram as the second term in ): @xmath276}{8\pi^2 } \epsilon^{\mu\nu\lambda\rho}g^\alpha_{\mu\nu } f_{\lambda\rho}\ : . \ ] ] current in the presence of non - trivial @xmath258 background * ( a ) * ; or in a background of two @xmath2 fields * ( b)*. ] recall that @xmath268 and @xmath258 fields , entering and , are the fields _ above _ the electroweak symmetry breaking scale . at lower energies it is convenient to re - express these anomalies in terms of of electro - magnetic field @xmath277 and _ neutral _ field @xmath278 , which can be obtained from the @xmath2 and @xmath258 fields @xmath279 and @xmath280 via the rotation @xmath281 and @xmath282 . , etc . ) because we use different normalization of the action for the gauge fields the one with the coupling constant in front of the kinetic term . ] the electro - magnetic current @xmath283 is given by @xmath284 and _ neutral current _ @xmath285 , where @xmath286 is the 3rd component of the @xmath258 triplet @xmath287 , @xmath288 . using ( [ eq:92 ] ) and ( [ eq:94 ] ) one can easily see that _ ( i ) _ electro - magnetic current is conserved in the arbitrary background of electro - magnetic fields ( as one expected , because the electrodynamics remains vector - like in our model ) ; _ ( ii ) _ there is an anomalous @xmath289 _ coupling _ @xmath290 which implies the non - conservation of the neutral current in the parallel electric and magnetic fields ( @xmath291 is the number of generations ) ; _ ( iii ) _ another important consequence of the presence of @xmath289 coupling is the non - conservation of the electro - magnetic current in the mixed electro - magnetic and @xmath292-backgrounds : @xmath293 as we will see this leads to the effects similar to those , described in sections [ sec : observ - inflow][sec : dipole - moment ] . consider again the setup of section [ sec : observ - inflow ] : place a capacitor in the strong magnetic field @xmath294 , such that electric field @xmath295 , created by the capacitor is in the same direction @xmath104 . our choice of hypercharges implies the non - conservation of @xmath296 current . this also means that there exist chern - simons terms in the bulk action , which ensure an anomaly inflow , canceling anomaly ( [ eq:96 ] ) . indeed , chern - simons term ( [ eq:3 ] ) , originally written in terms of the hypercharge field @xmath269 and @xmath258 field @xmath297 , can also be re - expressed in terms of electro - magnetic and z - field and it creates a inflow of z - current in the parallel electric and magnetic fields . this creates anomalous density of z charge on the brane . this distribution of z charge creates an anomalous z field in the 5th direction and as a result inflow of _ electro - magnetic _ current to cancel an anomaly ( [ eq:97 ] ) . such an inflow creates anomalous distribution of electric charge on the brane and modifies electric field inside and outside the capacitor . similarly to the case of electrodynamics ( section [ sec : qed ] ) we can find this static configuration of an electric field . it will be given by the same expression as in section [ sec : final - state ] ( see appendix [ sec : ew - final - state - compute ] for details ) . as a result , distribution of an electric field inside and outside the capacitor is given by expressions ( [ eq:55])([eq:57 ] ) , with @xmath170 proportional to the magnetic field @xmath171 and anomaly parameter @xmath58 : @xmath298 notice , that this result does not depend on the mass scale of the extra dimension and would be true even for planck scale @xmath25 . it also does not depend on the mass of the z boson @xmath299 . this feature , as well as the result ( [ eq:237 ] ) itself , is valid only assuming that @xmath300 . this can be understood as follows : anomalous density of z charge creates electric z field in the 5th direction . this field is , of course , decaying on the scales larger than @xmath301 . however the inflow comes from the region ( [ eq:53 ] ) which is much smaller than @xmath301 . as a result , in the leading order in @xmath302 mass of the z boson does not modify the effect . for details see appendix [ sec : ew - final - state - compute ] . the consequence of anomaly is the appearance of anomalous dipole moment of the particle ( c.f . section [ sec : dipole - moment ] ) . namely , a background with non - zero @xmath303 can be created around any particle which has a spin and also electric and @xmath292-charges . unlike the electro - magnetic case , @xmath292-field , created by the particle , is short - ranged . in the physically interesting case of a particle , lighter than @xmath292-boson ( e.g. proton or electron ) , anomaly inflow is concentrated in the region smaller then compton wave length of the particle and , therefore , it can not be treated quasi - classically . therefore we will only give the order of magnitude estimate here . compared to the analysis of section [ sec : dipole - moment ] the result is suppressed by @xmath304 : @xmath305 again , this result does not depend on the parameters of the extra dimension , but in this case it depends on the mass of the particle and on @xmath299 . in this paper we analyzed a brane - world scenario , when fields on the brane possess an anomaly , canceled by inflow from the bulk . we stress that in such setup there is no reason to require cancellation of anomaly separately on the brane . we show in a simple model of electrodynamics that inflow results in the concrete observational effects , even in the situation when the real escaping of the matter from the brane is not possible . this logic can also be applied to the standard model ( sm ) , if one considers it as an effective theory of some fundamental theory in higher - dimensional space - time . anomaly cancellation condition which is usually assumed in sm becomes an unjustified fine - tuning and one should study the theory without it . easing this condition leads ( in the simplest case ) to the one free parameter electric charge difference of electron and proton . this is one more legitimate phenomenological parameter imposed onto the sm from the point of view of extra - dimensions . we show that with this parameter ( called @xmath306 in sections [ sec : anom - sm][sec : proton ] ) being non - zero , the phenomenology of the standard model is modified in such a way as to admit an anomaly . it is interesting to note that this modification does not affect electrodynamics sector of the sm : even for different charges of electron and proton it remains non - anomalous . the presence of anomaly inflow exhibits itself on a brane via a subtle mechanism , leading to the dynamical screening of an electric field in the presence of a parallel magnetic field , e.g the change of an electric field in a capacitor , placed in a magnetic field . similarly , anomaly inflow leads to the screening and change with time of the electric charge of any elementary particle with electric charge and spin . the inflow , before the screened static solution is formed , such a particle acquires also anomalous dipole moment , which , however , disappears again in the final state , where the electric field is parity symmetric , but screened . these effects would not be present if the theory were purely 4-dimensional , with anomaly canceled by addition of new ( chiral ) particles at higher energies . thus the described effects can in principle serve as a signature of extra dimensions . of course , there can exist other low - energy ( as well as high - energy ) effects , through which anomaly inflow exhibits itself . for example , one can show that photon , propagating in the magnetic field , would becomes massive , depending on its polarization . we plan to study other signatures of anomaly inflow elsewhere . [ [ radiative - corrections . ] ] radiative corrections . + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + the analysis in this paper was conducted at the level of classical equations of motion . the natural question arises : to which extent this theory can be considered weakly coupled and radiative corrections can be neglected ? a most sensible quantity seems to be the mass of the photon , which is constrained strongly by a number of different experiments . a simple power counting applied to a diagram , shown on fig . [ fig : twocs ] , containing two triangles in the _ anomalous four - dimensional _ electroweak theory with a non - standard hypercharge choice , gives an order of magnitude of the photon mass @xmath307 . then , for an ultraviolet cutoff of the order of @xmath308 tev one finds a very strong constraint on an anomaly coefficient @xmath58 . if the same consideration were true for our case , when the anomalous electroweak theory is coming from anomaly - free theory in 5 dimensions , the classical effects described in this paper would be subleading and non - observable . however , this is not the case because of the following reason . the same diagram , considered now in full 5-dimensional theory , where both massive and zero modes run in loops , does not lead to generation of the photon mass simply because the theory is free from anomalies and is gauge - invariant . on the language of the effective field theory , the insertion of triangular diagrams will not produce any irregularities , as any contribution coming from the chern - simons vertex is precisely canceled by the same process with an insertion of a dhoker - farhi vertex . [ [ effective - theory . ] ] effective theory . + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + our main result , given by eqs . ( [ eq:54 ] ) , ( [ eq:237 ] ) , does not depend on the mass scale of the 5th dimension @xmath25 and on the higgs vev . so , the effect stays even when these parameters are sent to infinity , in other words , when the only low energy particle residing in the spectrum is the photon . this can also be seen from eqs . ( [ eq:3 ] ) and ( [ eq:20 ] ) , which do not contain any information about the heavy particles which generated them and are not suppressed by any cut - off . this may seemingly contradict to the usual logic behind effective field theories which is based on the conjecture ( often known as `` decoupling theorem '' and proven for quite a general class of four - dimensional theories in @xcite ) that effects of massive fields on the _ renormalizable _ low - energy effective action only exhibit themselves in renormalization of charges and fields , while all additional interaction are suppressed by some positive power of @xmath309 ( characteristic energy of processes over cut - off @xmath310 ) . it is known , however , that the `` decoupling theorem '' does not always hold . in particular , it is not true in theories , leading to chern - simons @xcite or dhoker - farhi @xcite interactions . in the latter case the low energy theory is _ non - renormalizable _ , which is true for our case as well . so , in addition to the chern - simons and the dhoker - farhi term in the effective theory one must introduce infinitely many other terms and counterterms to remove divergences . to determine them one needs the knowledge of the fundamental theory . the construction of this type of theory goes beyond the scope of the present work . the low energy description of our theory contains 5-dimensional terms ( see e.g. action ( [ eq:2 ] ) ) . it would be interesting to construct a low - energy effective action entirely in terms of 4-dimensional fields . naively , one could try to integrate over the massive modes of the field @xmath311 in the action ( [ eq:2 ] ) . however , as this work demonstrates , the chern - simons term in ( [ eq:2 ] ) can not be treated perturbatively , therefore it is not clear how one can perform such an integration . [ [ fine - tuning - of - anomaly - mismatch . ] ] fine - tuning of anomaly mismatch . + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + the idea of realization of the standard model on a brane is very popular and wide - spread nowadays . as we showed in this paper , any such model should either produce a mechanism , which prohibits the anomaly on the brane ( due to symmetry reasons or dynamics ) or incorporate it into the model . at the same time , it is known experimentally that ( if non - zero ) the charge difference between electron and proton is extremely small . as a result , one is presented with a novel type of a fine - tuned parameter and should try to find a reason for its existence . as it is usually the case , this fine - tuning can tell us something new about the physics beyond the standard model . certainly , the answers to the questions of anomalous standard model and fine - tuning of its anomaly coefficient will depend on various ingredients of the brane - world models : the higher - dimensional theory , the details of localization of the fields , etc . therefore it is important to consider semi - realistic brane - worlds , where at least some sector of the standard model ( including gauge fields ) is localized . a simple example of such sort was proposed in @xcite , where the @xmath2 theory was localized on the vortex in six dimensions . in that model the fermionic content on the brane could have anomalous chiral couplings ( while the theory in the bulk was always anomaly free ) . this theory can be considered as a particular realization of the scenario of section [ sec : qed ] and effects , similar to those , described in section [ sec : observ - inflow ] , should be present there . one should notice also that its anomaly coefficient can be of the order of unity , as it should on general grounds . more realistic models should include non - abelian fields localized which is rather non - trivial . in all these models it is important to analyze the question of anomaly ( non)cancellation on the brane and the reason of the fine - tuning of corresponding parameters . in string theory , being a theory with extra - dimensions , this question also arises . a popular approach there is to obtain the standard model fields on an intersection of various branes ( see e.g. recent paper @xcite ) . on the other hand , there are many examples in string / m theory with branes when world volume theory is anomalous and there is an inflow ( see e.g. @xcite ) . again , there should be a special reason to have so exact anomaly cancellation for the standard model realized in this way . anomaly analysis is usually very instructive in string theory and a string theoretical solution of this problem would be very interesting . one should also apply this logic to any extension of the standard model ( e.g. to the minimal supersymmetric standard model ( mssm ) ) appearing in a brane - world setup . in this case there could be more free parameters which may allow for some other phenomenological effects ( e.g. non - zero electric charge of neutralinos ) . we would like to thank i. antoniadis , x. bekaert , v. cheianov , t. damour , s. dubovsky , j. harvey , s. khlebnikov , m. libanov , j .- h . park , s. randjbar - daemi , s. shadchin for useful comments . the work a.b . and m.s . was supported by the swiss science foundation . o.r . would like to acknowledge a partial support of the european research training network contract 005104 `` forcesuniverse '' and also warm hospitality of ecole polytechnique fdrale de lausanne where a part of this work was done . would like to acknowledge the hospitality of institut des hautes tudes scientifiques . to compute initial , linear in time , change of electromagnetic fields on the brane , one should specify values of the fields at @xmath109 . as discussed at the beginning of section [ sec : perturb ] , one should specify not only values of electromagnetic field ( to be discussed below , in sections [ app : naive][app : correct ] ) , but also initial values of gauge potential . in this paper we consider the following case . @xmath312 values of the time derivative at @xmath109 can then be determined , knowing field strengths and using eq . ( [ eq:18 ] ) . there are two non - zero derivatives : @xmath313 our initial conditions mean that at the initial moment the longitudinal component of the field is not excited . indeed , at @xmath109 our field @xmath314 obeys : @xmath315 and @xmath316 ( we denote by @xmath317 ) , which means that it is transversal . notice , that the condition ( [ eq:24 ] ) implies that transversality of @xmath314 will not hold for @xmath318 . for these initial conditions the only non - zero component of the dhoker - farhi current is @xmath319 first , we attempt to solve the maxwell equations ( [ eq:6])([eq:7 ] ) by perturbation theory in @xmath58 . in addition to the initial condition ( [ eq:30 ] ) , we take initial electric fields to satisfy gauss constraints in the theory with @xmath123 ( see the discussion in the beginning of section [ sec : perturb ] ) : @xmath320 we will mark such fields by the symbol @xmath124 . our choice in particular imply that @xmath321 . although the zero mode of the gauge field has constant profile in fifth direction , the solution of ( [ eq:31 ] ) gives @xmath322 and @xmath323 , both decaying at @xmath324 . the rate at which these fields decay depends on the warp - factor @xmath192 . a solenoid creates non - zero field @xmath325 as well as @xmath326 , again , both decaying at infinity in @xmath133 ( see @xcite for details ) . according to the definition of the inflow current ( [ eq:8 ] ) such electric and magnetic fields generate the inflow current from the fifth direction : @xmath327 this current flows onto the brane from both sides in the @xmath133 direction . two other non - zero components of the chern - simons current are @xmath328 for our configuration of electric and magnetic fields the dhoker - farhi current ( [ eq:20 ] ) satisfies the following property : @xmath329 this property suggests that the dynamics of the theory may be separated into two parts : dynamics in the directions @xmath330 and in @xmath331 . we will see below that this is indeed the case at the initial stage of the process . for the initial conditions of section [ sec : perturb ] , the anomaly of the dhoker - farhi current is split equally between @xmath332 and @xmath333 , both being equal to the right hand side of eq . ( [ eq:34 ] ) . in particular @xmath334 i.e. we see that an electric charge is accumulating on the brane between the plates of the capacitor . at initial stage of anomaly inflow , only electric fields appears in the left hand side of the maxwell equations ( [ eq:6]) ( [ eq:7 ] ) . the reason for that is the following . as we have shown , initially the total charge density grows linearly in time ( [ eq:86 ] ) . therefore , it creates electric field , also growing linearly in time . as a consequence of the bianchi identities ( @xmath335 ) all the magnetic components @xmath336 . thus , if we keep only terms at most linear in time in these equations , we obtain : @xmath337 all the gauge fields in the left hand side are of the order @xmath196 , while those in the right hand side are of the zeroth order in @xmath58 and are explicitly multiplied by @xmath58 . ( [ eq:37 ] ) gives @xmath338 and similarly from eq . ( [ eq:39 ] ) @xmath339 we see that _ for any _ @xmath58 the correction @xmath340 will become bigger than @xmath341 for large @xmath214 , as @xmath342 for @xmath139 . notice , that solution is a _ 5-dimensional _ electric field . to discuss the observational consequences , we should switch to the 4-dimensional fields , defined as in ( [ eq:12 ] ) , namely @xmath343 four - dimensional electric field @xmath239 is given by @xmath344 integration in can be done explicitly in the region @xmath237 . as shown in @xcite @xmath345 is a constant as a function of @xmath133 for @xmath346 . notice , that even in case of @xmath347 integral ( [ eq:43 ] ) is convergent . indeed , for any warp - factor @xmath192 , decaying at infinity , @xmath348-component of an electric field decays at infinity as @xmath349 ( see @xcite for details ) . we will be using this approximation through this section . the error from approximation of @xmath350 by its value at the origin @xmath351 can be estimated as @xmath352 ( see @xcite for details ) . in case of the warp @xmath353 the integral ( [ eq:43 ] ) is saturated in the region @xmath354 . the solution of this section has an apparent problem : for any @xmath58 , e.g. @xmath136 becomes bigger than @xmath138 for @xmath214 large enough . see the discussion in the section [ sec : perturb ] . to compute perturbatively in @xmath58 an initial changes of electric field of a capacitor , we should choose a zeroth approximation different from that of the previous appendix . namely , we express @xmath215 and @xmath138 via an auxiliary function @xmath218 such that @xmath219 and @xmath220 with @xmath218 given by ( [ eq:51 ] ) : @xmath355 where @xmath202 is a value of a _ 4-dimensional electric field _ between the plates of the capacitor . the initial field @xmath223 satisfies 4-dimensional poisson equation : @xmath356 . unlike the case of section [ sec : perturb ] , the _ initial _ chern - simons charge density @xmath113 is not equal to zero ( as one can see by substituting @xmath341 and @xmath357 into the gauss constraint ) . this implies that component @xmath358 is nonzero ( it can be read off the right hand side of the gauss constraint ( [ eq:22 ] ) using the definition ( [ eq:8 ] ) ( see also ( [ eq:158 ] ) ) : @xmath359 where @xmath172 is given by ( [ eq:49 ] ) . however , its explicit form will not be needed for the analysis below . the first correction to the field @xmath211 is given by @xmath360 ( recall , that our initial conditions for the dhoker - farhi currents are those of eq . ( [ eq:30 ] ) , and therefore @xmath361 ) . similarly @xmath362 notice that according to the definition ( [ eq:12 ] ) the _ 4-dimensional _ electric field , @xmath239 is determined by only the first term in ( [ eq:61 ] ) : @xmath363 the difference of equation ( [ eq:63 ] ) with that of ( [ eq:43 ] ) in the section [ sec : perturb ] is in the fact that here the integral over @xmath133 in effectively restricted to the region @xmath364 . in this region one can substitute @xmath345 with its value @xmath171 in the center of the solenoid . as a result one gets : @xmath365 one can check that in the linear in @xmath58 order the energy is conserved . indeed , in this order the change of energy ( in the full 5-dimensional theory ) is given by @xmath366 substituting the solutions ( [ eq:61])([eq:62 ] ) we see that the integrand of ( [ eq:74 ] ) is equal to zero . from the point of view of the 4-dimensional observer , the energy is defined as @xmath367 and therefore its change in the linear in @xmath58 order is @xmath368 because the @xmath369 is an even function of @xmath107 , while @xmath370 is an odd one , this integral is equal to zero . thus although there is an inflow of chern - simons currents to the brane , the energy on the brane does not change . it simply gets redistributed in the space , as field appear outside the capacitor and diminishes inside . according to the definition ( [ eq:110 ] ) @xmath371 , where the function @xmath372 equals to 1 for @xmath373 and zero otherwise and @xmath374 ( see appendix [ sec : final - state - compute ] ) . as a result we see that _ the inflow current creates a non - zero charge density on the brane in the region where ( 4-dimensional ) @xmath375 _ ( in our case between the plates of the capacitor ) : one should take into account that there is a contribution , coming from the term @xmath376 . as mentioned after the eq . ( [ eq:34 ] ) , divergence of the dhoker - farhi current is equally split between @xmath377 and @xmath331 components . therefore , the coefficient in front of the integral in ( [ eq:65 ] ) is twice as little as that in eq . ( [ eq:64 ] ) . this can be easily verified by directly computing @xmath378 from eq . ( [ eq:38 ] ) and substituting it together with ( [ eq:64 ] ) into ( [ eq:65 ] ) . ] @xmath379 thus the capacitor accumulates over time an additional electric charge @xmath380 ( where area @xmath381 ) . this means that from a 4-dimensional point of view there is an electric current flowing from infinity . indeed , according to the definition ( [ eq:14 ] ) the 4-dimensional current in the direction @xmath107 is given by @xmath382 ( both @xmath383 and @xmath384 are equal to zero in the linear in time approximation ) . as we will now see , this current @xmath233 is non - zero as @xmath385 . using definition ( [ eq:33 ] ) we get : @xmath386 where @xmath387 . if anomalous electric charge @xmath388 changes with time , this means that @xmath389 or equivalently that @xmath390 ( we have substituted integral over the @xmath8 plane with the area @xmath391 of the plates of the capacitor ) . using eq . ( [ eq:110 ] ) one can see that indeed @xmath392 . this gives @xmath393 the result ( [ eq:68 ] ) can be obtained from the conservation of the 5-dimensional current . namely , one can see that there is a flow of the chern - simons current from infinity . in the approximation @xmath394 we should also take @xmath395 ( @xmath396 has the same @xmath133-dependence as @xmath397 ) and therefore we can neglect radial chern - simons current . as a result the analysis becomes effectively @xmath1 dimensional in coordinates @xmath398 . consider a box @xmath399 , @xmath400 , where both @xmath401 . the total amount of chern - simons current , inflowing through the boundaries of this box is @xmath402 from eqs . ( [ eq:32])([eq:33 ] ) it follows that the first integral equals to zero : @xmath403 as @xmath404 for @xmath405 ( see ( [ eq:110 ] ) ) . at the same time the second integral in ( [ eq:69 ] ) is finite : @xmath406 as @xmath407 for @xmath408 . as a result we again recover ( [ eq:68 ] ) . ) together with the initial conditions @xmath409 and the fact that the total charge density is equal to @xmath114 implies that @xmath410 in ( [ eq:69 ] ) is equal to @xmath388 . ] the anomalous charge @xmath388 creates an additional electric field eq . ( [ eq:43 ] ) . that is we see that due to the anomaly inflow an electric field appears outside of the capacitor . in the region close to the plates , ( i.e. @xmath411 and @xmath237 ) this field is constant in space and grows linearly in time according to the law @xmath412 inside the capacitor @xmath239 changes linearly from its value ( [ eq:72 ] ) on one plate of the capacitor to the opposite of it on another . we see that the electric field , created due to the anomaly inflow depends on the anomaly coefficient @xmath58 and _ does not depend _ on the parameters of the extra dimension . from eq . ( [ eq:72 ] ) we can determine the characteristic time during which the linear approximation is valid . it is given by @xmath413 and our solution ( [ eq:40 ] ) is valid for @xmath414 . consider the system of maxwell equations , describing a _ static _ solution in @xmath415 dimensions : @xmath416 ( we will be mostly interested in the case when @xmath417 or @xmath418 ) . we are searching for the axially - symmetric static solution , therefore all the derivatives with respect to time and angle @xmath151 were put to zero in eqs . ( [ eq:153])([eq:157 ] ) . the components of chern - simons current ( [ eq:8 ] ) in the cylindrical coordinates @xmath149 are equal to @xmath419 for static solution we can describe the electric field in terms of the electro - static potential @xmath144 : @xmath145 , @xmath146 . in this case one can rewrite expression @xmath420 in the following way : @xmath421 as a result we solve the system ( [ eq:153])([eq:157 ] ) by the following ansatz . we express @xmath120 , @xmath422 , @xmath423 via @xmath144 and @xmath424 , using eqs . ( [ eq:154 ] ) , ( [ eq:155 ] ) , ( [ eq:157 ] ) : @xmath425 then the gauss constraint ( [ eq:153 ] ) can be re - written as @xmath426 where @xmath148 is a 3-dimensional laplacian in the coordinates @xmath149 . the equation ( [ eq:156 ] ) becomes ( we introduce gauge potential @xmath116 : ) @xmath427 we will find a solution of the eqs . ( [ eq:165])([eq:166 ] ) as follows . first we will put right hand side of eq . ( [ eq:166 ] ) to zero . then there is a solution @xmath154 , @xmath428 , @xmath429 . in this case one could easily find an explicit solution of eq . ( [ eq:165 ] ) see eqs . ( [ eq:167])([eq:176 ] ) below . after that we will show that corrections to the found solutions , which are due to the non - zero right hand side of are of the order @xmath157 and thus can be neglected . under assumptions @xmath430 , @xmath431 , @xmath156 gauss law becomes identical to that of the @xmath1 dimensional case . after the fourier transform in @xmath149-directions : ( @xmath432 ) and a substitution @xmath159 equation ( [ eq:165 ] ) becomes in eq . ( [ eq:9 ] ) as compared to ( [ eq:165 ] ) . it accounts for the perturbative corrections of the order @xmath196 . ] @xmath433 = \frac{36{\,\mathbf{e}}^4\kappa_0 ^ 2 { \text{\textbf{\slshape h}}}_0 ^ 2}{\delta^2(z ) } \psi_p(z)+{\,\mathbf{e}}^2 \tilde q(\vec p ) \delta(z ) \:,\ ] ] where @xmath434 and @xmath435 is a fourier transform of @xmath176 . for our main example the warp - factor @xmath436 , we have @xmath437 . let us re - write eq . ( [ eq:167 ] ) as @xmath438 where operator @xmath162 does not depend on @xmath163 : @xmath439 [ [ sec : spectrum ] ] spectrum of @xmath162 : + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + let us denote eigen - functions of ( [ eq:169 ] ) and their eigen - values by @xmath165 and @xmath166 : @xmath167 . introduce new _ dimensionless _ variable @xmath440 and denote by @xmath441 . then the eigen - value problem for operator ( [ eq:169 ] ) reduces to @xmath442 this is the standard form of the equation for the bessel functions of the second kind . a solution of this equation , which is regular at @xmath443 ( i.e. @xmath444 ) is given by @xmath445 , which behaves at infinity as @xmath446 . as a result we see that the solution of eq . ( [ eq:170 ] ) is given by @xmath447 eigen - values @xmath166 are determined from the gluing condition at the origin , following from the presence of @xmath448 in the operator ( [ eq:169 ] ) @xmath449\bigr|_{z=0 } = -2{m}\psi_n(0)$ ] : @xmath450 where @xmath451 was defined in ( [ eq:171 ] ) and @xmath452 . using the properties of the bessel function ( see e.g. @xcite ) one can show that there is a single solution of this equation for real @xmath453 ( corresponding to the smallest eigen - value ( @xmath454 ) and infinitely many solutions for imaginary @xmath453 s ( corresponding to all the other eigen - values @xmath455 ) . the easiest way to solve eq . ( [ eq:172 ] ) is by iteration around @xmath456 . as a result one finds that , for which a zero mode exists , that operator @xmath162 has the lowest eigen - value @xmath457 . ] @xmath458 the wave - function of the lowest level is given by @xmath459 where @xmath174 is a modified bessel function of the second kind and @xmath175 is a normalization constant , given by @xmath460 . the green s function of the operator ( [ eq:168 ] ) is given by the standard expression @xmath461 the solution of eq . ( [ eq:165 ] ) can be easily found for any charge distribution @xmath176 . in case at hand ( capacitor with the infinite plates ) one gets : @xmath462 we will also often use the function @xmath463 . it is given by : @xmath464 and has the following important properties : @xmath465 and @xmath466 consider the system of two couple @xmath2 fields : a massless ( electro - magnetic ) one , whose gauge potential and field strength we will denote by @xmath314 and @xmath467 and _ massive _ ( @xmath468 field ) , with gauge potential @xmath469 and field strength @xmath470 . these fields interact via chern - simons terms : @xmath471 where ( compare ( [ eq:96 ] ) ) @xmath472 fermions interact with both electro - magnetic and z fields . according to eqs . ( [ eq:92 ] ) , ( [ eq:94 ] ) both electro - magnetic current @xmath473 and z - current @xmath296 are not conserved : @xmath474 and @xmath475 this means that there are two types of inflow currents : z - current @xmath476 and electro - magnetic chern - simons currents : @xmath477 the expression for the dhoker - farhi currents @xmath478 and @xmath479 are similar to that of eq . ( [ eq:20 ] ) with an obvious modifications following from eqs . ( [ eq:217])([eq:226 ] ) . consider the system of maxwell equations , describing a _ static _ solution in @xmath415 dimension . for static solution we can describe the electric field in terms of the electro - static potential @xmath144 : @xmath145 , @xmath480 . we will denote electro - static potential for the electro - magnetic and z - field as @xmath481 and @xmath482 correspondingly . then we obtain : @xmath483 where @xmath148 is a 3-dimensional laplacian in the coordinates @xmath149 . we will be mostly interested in the case when @xmath417 or @xmath418 . for the z - field we have similar system of equations : @xmath484 we are searching for the axially - symmetric static solution , therefore all the derivatives with respect to time and angle @xmath151 were put to zero in eqs . ( [ eq:179])([eq:224 ] ) . to find a solution of this non - linear system of equations , let us recall the electro - magnetic case first ( appendix [ sec : final - state - compute ] ) . we saw there that of all the magnetic components @xmath485 and @xmath486 only @xmath487 was not suppressed by a power of anomaly parameter @xmath58 . , @xmath488 and @xmath489 are of the same order , we will use notation @xmath58 when speaking about the order of magnitude value of various expressions . ] we will try to find a solution of the system ( [ eq:179])([eq:224 ] ) under a similar assumption : only terms , containing @xmath487 , give dominating ( non - perturbative in @xmath58 ) contribution to these equations , while all other terms account for small ( suppressed by powers of @xmath58 ) corrections . in addition we take all components of the magnetic z - field to be much smaller than those of electro - magnetic field . then the system of equations ( [ eq:179])([eq:224 ] ) reduces to the gauss constraints for potentials @xmath482 and @xmath481 , _ in which we have left only terms , proportional to @xmath487 _ : @xmath490 and @xmath491 other relevant parts of the system ( [ eq:179])([eq:224 ] ) are equations for the component @xmath120 : @xmath492 and @xmath493 : @xmath494 from eqs . ( [ eq:229 ] ) we immediately see that @xmath495 similarly to the electro - magnetic case ( compare eq . ( [ eq:164 ] ) ) . solution of eq . ( [ eq:230 ] ) depends on the @xmath133-dependence of the mass - term @xmath496 . as an example we will consider @xmath497 ( localization scale of the higgs field is of the same order as that of the fermions on ) . in this case , one can easily see that the solution of eqs . ( [ eq:230])([eq:231 ] ) does not differ from the massless case : is an odd function of @xmath133 and therefore @xmath498 and mass term disappears from ( [ eq:231 ] ) . one could in principle add to the solution ( [ eq:225 ] ) the term @xmath499 , however , this term grows as @xmath137 as @xmath324 and therefore the energy of such a solution would be infinite . thus , we conclude that @xmath500 , mass terms in eqs . ( [ eq:230])([eq:231 ] ) drop out and the solution for @xmath493 is given by ( [ eq:225]).]@xmath501 is a limiting case , in which mass dependence drops out of equation ( [ eq:232 ] ) and subsequent does not enter at all into gauss constraint for an electric field . one can show that for arbitrary profiles @xmath496 , spreading into the 5th direction , eq . ( [ eq:232 ] ) receives corrections due to mass . in particular the effect , described in this section disappears as @xmath502 . ] @xmath503 and as a result we obtain the following system of equations : @xmath504 we will solve this system by assuming that the last terms of both equations ( [ eq:233 ] ) and ( [ eq:234 ] ) can be treated perturbatively . the results of our computations then will confirm this assumption . let us start with eq . ( [ eq:233 ] ) . with exception of the last term we have already encountered similar system in section [ sec : final - state ] ( see also appendix [ sec : final - state - compute ] ) . for @xmath505 the solution is given by analogs of eqs . ( [ eq:51])([eq:52 ] ) : ) is easy to obtain , knowing the spectrum of the operator ( [ eq:169 ] ) and writing its green s function ( compare ( [ eq:175 ] ) ) . ] @xmath506 ( where by @xmath507 we have denoted fourier transform of the function @xmath508 with respect to @xmath107 ) . function @xmath509 satisfies the poisson equation with the mass term @xmath510 with the mass @xmath511 the profile of @xmath481 in the @xmath133 direction @xmath178 is given by @xmath512 ( here @xmath174 is a modified bessel function of the second kind ) . this profile is sharply localized in the region @xmath513 the last term in ( [ eq:239 ] ) can be treated perturbatively in @xmath306 if a @xmath133-profile of the field @xmath482 is decaying faster than @xmath192 . to demonstrate that this is indeed the case , let us insert the solution ( [ eq:239 ] ) into the gauss constraint ( [ eq:228 ] ) . we will find that expression for @xmath482 is given by expression , similar to the ( [ eq:239])([eq:241 ] ) : @xmath514 ( by @xmath515 we have denoted fourier transform of the solution ( [ eq:239 ] ) with respect to @xmath107 ) . here @xmath516 is a solution of a differential equation similar to ( [ eq:167 ] ) but with the modification of the factor in front of the @xmath448 : @xmath517 . this modifies gluing condition ( [ eq:172 ] ) , which determined the eigen - values of the equation in @xmath133 direction : @xmath518 . as a result expression for @xmath519 is given by : @xmath520 ( the corrections to this result are of the order @xmath521 and @xmath522 , where @xmath523 ) . as the first term in eq . ( [ eq:106 ] ) is much bigger than the second one gev and arbitrary @xmath524 , recalling that 1 gauss@xmath525 and the strongest magnetic fields , achievable in a laboratory are @xmath526 gauss . ] we neglect the latter and find the mass @xmath527 in contrast with ( [ eq:240 ] ) . notice , however , that the profile of the @xmath482 in @xmath133 direction is very similar to that of eq . ( [ eq:241 ] ) , still decaying as @xmath185 at the distances of the order ( [ eq:242 ] ) . finally , function @xmath528 , entering ( [ eq:243 ] ) satisfies poisson equation with the mass term of the z - boson : @xmath529 now we can analyze corrections due to the last term in eq . ( [ eq:243 ] ) . from solution ( [ eq:239 ] ) we see that both terms ( and thus the whole @xmath530 ) have @xmath133-profile proportional to @xmath178 . similarly , @xmath133-profile of the field @xmath482 is proportional to @xmath531 and again decays as @xmath185 for @xmath214 outside the region ( [ eq:242 ] ) . one can easily find that integrals over @xmath532 in both expressions ( [ eq:239 ] ) and ( [ eq:243 ] ) behave as @xmath533 as an index of a bessel function in expressions for @xmath534 and @xmath516 . ] and therefore these terms give small ( of the order @xmath535 corrections to the functions @xmath509 and @xmath536 . substituting expressions for @xmath481 and @xmath482 into ( [ eq:225 ] ) and ( [ eq:232 ] ) , one can easily see that these terms are indeed proportional to @xmath58 , have the profiles , decaying as @xmath185 i.e. can be treated perturbatively . thus , we have shown that the last terms in eqs . ( [ eq:227 ] ) and ( [ eq:228 ] ) can be treated perturbatively in @xmath58 and therefore can be neglected . after that equation for @xmath481 becomes identical to that of the section [ sec : final - state ] and thus the static configuration of an electric field in a capacitor will be the same ! 99 c. n. yang and r. l. mills , `` conservation of isotopic spin and isotopic gauge invariance , '' phys . rev . * 96 * , 191 ( 1954 ) . d. j. gross and r. jackiw , `` effect of anomalies on quasirenormalizable theories , '' phys . d * 6 * , 477 ( 1972 ) ; s. l. adler , `` axial vector vertex in spinor electrodynamics , '' phys . rev . * 177 * , 2426 ( 1969 ) ; j. s. bell and r. jackiw , `` a pcac puzzle : pi0 @xmath537 gamma gamma in the sigma model , '' nuovo cim . a * 60 * , 47 ( 1969 ) . g. t hooft , `` symmetry breaking through bell - jackiw anomalies , '' phys . lett . * 37 * , 8 ( 1976 ) . v. a. rubakov , `` monopole induced baryon number nonconservation , '' iyai preprint iyai - p-0211 , april 1981 ; `` adler - bell - jackiw anomaly and fermion number breaking in the presence of a magnetic monopole , '' nucl . b * 203 * , 311 ( 1982 ) . c. g. callan , `` disappearing dyons , '' phys . d * 25 * , 2141 ( 1982 ) ; `` dyon - fermion dynamics , '' _ ibid . _ * 26 * , 2058 ( 1982 ) . h. georgi and s. l. glashow , `` gauge theories without anomalies , '' phys . rev . d * 6 * , 429 ( 1972 ) . e. dhoker and e. farhi , `` decoupling a fermion in the standard electroweak theory , '' nucl . b * 248 * , 77 ( 1984 ) ; e. dhoker and e. farhi , `` decoupling a fermion whose mass is generated by a yukawa coupling : the general case , '' nucl . b * 248 * , 59 ( 1984 ) . v. a. rubakov and m. e. shaposhnikov , `` do we live inside a domain wall ? , '' phys . b * 125 * , 136 ( 1983 ) . k. akama , `` an early proposal of brane world , '' lect . notes phys . * 176 * , 267 ( 1982 ) [ arxiv : hep - th/0001113 ] . s. randjbar - daemi and m. shaposhnikov , `` qed from six - dimensional vortex and gauge anomalies , '' jhep * 0304 * ( 2003 ) 016 [ arxiv : hep - th/0303247 ] . l. d. faddeev and s. l. shatashvili , `` algebraic and hamiltonian methods in the theory of nonabelian anomalies , '' theor . math . * 60 * , 770 ( 1984 ) [ teor . mat . fiz . * 60 * , 206 ( 1984 ) ] . c. g. callan and j. a. harvey , `` anomalies and fermion zero modes on strings and domain walls , '' nucl . b * 250 * , 427 ( 1985 ) . x. g. wen , `` chiral luttinger liquid and the edge excitations in the fractional quantum hall states , '' phys . b * 41 * , 12838 ( 1990 ) . j. frohlich and a. zee , `` large scale physics of the quantum hall fluid , '' nucl . b * 364 * , 517 ( 1991 ) . r. e. prange , s. m. girvin , eds . , _ the quantum hall effect _ , ( springer , new york , 1990 ) s. naculich , `` axionic strings : covariant anomalies and bosonization of chiral zero modes , '' nucl . b * 296 * , 837 ( 1988 ) ; j. a. harvey and o. ruchayskiy , `` the local structure of anomaly inflow , '' jhep * 0106 * , 044 ( 2001 ) [ arxiv : hep - th/0007037 ] . a. boyarsky , j. a. harvey and o. ruchayskiy , `` a toy model of the m5-brane : anomalies of monopole strings in five dimensions , '' annals phys . * 301 * , 1 ( 2002 ) [ arxiv : hep - th/0203154 ] . e. witten,``five - brane effective action in m - theory , '' j. geom . * 22 * , 103 ( 1997 ) [ hep - th/9610234 ] . m. b. green , j. a. harvey and g. w. moore , `` i - brane inflow and anomalous couplings on d - branes , '' class . * 14 * , 47 ( 1997 ) [ arxiv : hep - th/9605033 ] . d. freed , j. a. harvey , r. minasian and g. moore , `` gravitational anomaly cancellation for m - theory fivebranes , '' adv . * 2 * , 601 ( 1998 ) [ hep - th/9803205 ] . a. boyarsky and b. kulik , `` a note on the m5 brane anomaly , '' phys . b * 516 * , 171 ( 2001 ) [ arxiv : hep - th/0107041 ] . a. boyarsky , o. ruchayskiy and m. shaposhnikov , `` anomalies as a signature of extra dimensions , '' phys . b * 626 * , 184 ( 2005 ) [ arxiv : hep - ph/0507195 ] . s. khlebnikov and m. shaposhnikov , `` brane - worlds and theta - vacua , '' phys . d * 71 * , 104024 ( 2005 ) [ arxiv : hep - th/0412306 ] . v. a. rubakov , `` large and infinite extra dimensions : an introduction , '' phys . usp . * 44 * , 871 ( 2001 ) [ usp . nauk * 171 * , 913 ( 2001 ) ] [ arxiv : hep - ph/0104152 ] . s. randjbar - daemi and m. shaposhnikov , `` a formalism to analyze the spectrum of brane world scenarios , '' nucl . b * 645 * , 188 ( 2002 ) [ arxiv : hep - th/0206016 ] . s. l. dubovsky , v. a. rubakov and p. g. tinyakov , `` is the electric charge conserved in brane world ? , '' jhep * 0008 * , 041 ( 2000 ) [ arxiv : hep - ph/0007179 ] . m. marinelli and g. morpurgo , `` the electric neutrality of matter : a summary , '' phys . lett . b * 137 * , 439 ( 1984 ) . i. oda , `` localization of matters on a string - like defect , '' phys . b * 496 * , 113 ( 2000 ) [ arxiv : hep - th/0006203 ] . m. e. shaposhnikov and p. tinyakov , `` extra dimensions as an alternative to higgs mechanism ? , '' phys . b * 515 * , 442 ( 2001 ) [ arxiv : hep - th/0102161 ] . m. laine , h. b. meyer , k. rummukainen and m. shaposhnikov , `` localisation and mass generation for non - abelian gauge fields , '' jhep * 0301 * , 068 ( 2003 ) [ arxiv : hep - ph/0211149 ] . g. r. dvali , g. gabadadze and m. a. shifman , `` ( quasi)localized gauge field on a brane : dissipating cosmic radiation to extra dimensions ? , '' phys . b * 497 * , 271 ( 2001 ) [ arxiv : hep - th/0010071 ] . a. n. redlich , `` gauge noninvariance and parity nonconservation of three - dimensional fermions , '' phys . lett . * 52 * , 18 ( 1984 ) ; a. n. redlich , `` parity violation and gauge noninvariance of the effective gauge field action in three - dimensions , '' phys . d * 29 * ( 1984 ) 2366 . l. alvarez - gaume , s. della pietra and g. w. moore , `` anomalies and odd dimensions , '' annals phys . * 163 * , 288 ( 1985 ) . w. a. bardeen and b. zumino , `` consistent and covariant anomalies in gauge and gravitational theories , '' nucl . b * 244 * , 421 ( 1984 ) . j. ambjorn and p. olesen , `` electroweak magnetism : theory and application , '' int . j. mod . phys . a * 5 * , 4525 ( 1990 ) . j. ambjorn , j. greensite and c. peterson , `` the axial anomaly and the lattice dirac sea , '' nucl . b * 221 * , 381 ( 1983 ) . i. s. gradshteyn , i. m. ryzhik , a. jeffrey , d. zwillinger , _ table of integrals , series , and products _ , any edition . t. appelquist and j. carazzone , `` infrared singularities and massive fields , '' phys . d * 11 * , 2856 ( 1975 ) . i. antoniadis and s. dimopoulos , `` splitting supersymmetry in string theory , '' arxiv : hep - th/0411032 . Abstract:

Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.

Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered . Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video . Paper: the physics of hadrons began about one century ago , when it became appealing to build nuclei from protons and neutrons . the experimental search for the neutron was soon resumed along with the search for the particle predicted by yukawa as being responsible for the tight binding of protons and neutrons . see , e.g. , @xcite for the history of this early period . when interacting with nucleons or among themselves , the pions produce many resonances . the exchange of meson resonances , and the formation of nucleon resonances in the intermediate states are crucial for our understanding of the nuclear forces beyond the single - pion exchange proposed by yukawa . for instance , the existence of the vector mesons , nowadays known as @xmath0 and @xmath1 , was somewhat anticipated from the need for isospin - dependent spin - orbit components in the nucleon - nucleon interaction . see , e.g. , @xcite for an introduction into the early literature on this subject . the discovery of numerous meson or baryon resonances stimulated intense efforts to understand the underlying mechanisms that generate the hadrons . for instance , the @xmath0 meson can be described as a @xmath2 resonance in a @xmath3-wave , with the @xmath4-wave counterpart being the scalar meson responsible for the spin - isospin averaged attraction observed in nuclei . in 1955 , chew and low described the @xmath5 as the result of a strong @xmath6 interaction @xcite , and today , the scattering of pions off nuclei is still pictured as series of @xmath7-hole formation and annihilation . an ever more ambitious picture was proposed , called `` nuclear democracy '' or `` bootstrap '' , in which every hadron consists of all possible sets of hadrons compatible with its quantum numbers @xcite . unfortunately , neither the models based on nucleons and pions as elementary bricks , nor the bootstrap , succeeded in providing an overall picture . for instance , the degeneracy of isospin @xmath8 and @xmath9 mesons such as @xmath0 and @xmath1 , does not emerge naturally , if one assumes that their content is dominated by the nucleon - antinucleon component @xcite . from the very beginning , the attention was focused on hadrons with properties that look unusual , in contrast to the regularity patterns of the rest of the spectrum . the exotic character of a hadron is of course a time - dependent concept : once a striking property of a hadron is confirmed by further measurements , and understood within a plausible theoretical framework , the hadron ceases to be exotic . among the most famous examples , there is the @xmath10 meson , a peak of mass 1.02gev with a remarkably small width of about 4mev @xcite , decaying preferentially into a pair of kaons , though the decay into pions is energetically much easier . the decay patterns of the @xmath10 are now understood from its quark content @xmath11 , where @xmath4 denotes the strange quark , with very little mixing . the suppression of the internal annihilation of @xmath11 into light mesons has been codified in terms of the so - called `` zweig rule '' , eventually justified from the asymptotic - freedom limit of quantum chromo - dynamics ( qcd ) . the process took , however , several years , and was not mature enough when the @xmath12 particle was discovered at the end of 1974 ; it is a meson of mass about 3.1gev and width much less than 1mev @xcite . why the @xmath12 was not immediately identified with @xmath13 ? the great surprise was that the zweig rule works too well ! as compared to the @xmath14 , the @xmath12 is three times heavier , so its phase - space for decay into light mesons is considerably larger , and yet its width is smaller ! for the @xmath15 , the effect is even more pronounced , but when the @xmath15 was discovered in 1977 @xcite , the lesson was learnt , and the @xmath15 was never considered as exotic . today , any attempt to provide with a definition of an `` exotic '' hadron starts from the quark model . a meson with quantum numbers that can not be matched by any spin - orbital state of a quark and an antiquark is obviously exotic . states with unusual properties but ordinary quantum numbers are named `` crypto - exotic '' states . in particular , ordinary baryons can reach any set of values of the spin - parity @xmath16 with half - integer spin @xmath17 and parity @xmath18 , so a baryon can not be exotic except for its flavour content . a consensus has thus been reached that a hadron is exotic if it can not be understood as mainly made of quark - antiquark nor quark - quark - quark , but `` mainly '' remains vague . while simple quark models will propose a reference with a frozen number of constituents , more advance pictures include an expansion in the fock space , with additional quark - antiquark pairs in the wave function . the hope is that the expansion converges , and that a clean separation emerges between exotic and non - exotics . this review is organised as follows . in sec . [ se : mesons ] , we shall review states with unusual properties in the light ( sec . [ sse : mesons - light ] ) , open heavy - flavour ( sec . [ sse : mesons - open1 ] ) , double heavy flavour ( sec . [ sse : mesons - open2 ] ) , and hidden heavy - flavour ( sec . [ sse : mesons - hidden ] ) sectors . the baryon spectrum is discussed in sec . [ se : baryons ] , with , again a separation between the non - exotic light sector ( sec . [ sse : baryons - light - ns ] for non strange and sec . [ sse : baryons - light - negs ] for strange baryons ) , the exotic light pentaquark with positive strangeness in sec . [ sse : baryons - light - poss ] , the case of open heavy - flavour , single ( sec . [ sse : baryons - open1 ] ) or double single ( sec . [ sse : baryons - open2 ] ) , the anticharmed pentaquark in sec . [ sse : antich - baryons ] , and the case of hidden heavy - flavour ( sec . [ sse : baryons - hidden ] ) with in , particular , the recent pentaquark states found by the lhcb collaboration . the multibaryon systems will be discussed in sec . [ se : multibaryons ] . the various theoretical models will be reviewed in sec . [ se : theory ] , with some emphasis on string dynamics and potential models . some limits have to be set . the case of light hadrons will be just outlined , to focus more on the most recent states containing heavy quarks or antiquarks . in the former sector , the literature is enormous , and can be traced back from the conference proceedings that will be cited in the next sections , from some well - known reviews such as @xcite , or from study groups for future facilities @xcite . for the recent exotics with hidden charm , there exists already excellent and even comprehensive reviews , such as @xcite . our aim here is not to compete with these reviews , nor to duplicate them , but rather to discuss critically the recent findings and the models that they inspired . so , this paper will be more subjective . hopefully , it will trigger some discussion , and , perhaps , attract newcomers into the field , where innovative ideas are welcome . the bibliography for such a subject can not be comprehensive . some past review articles are cited , which give access to the early papers . we apologise in advance in the event where some important contributions are inadvertently omitted . there are many hot issues on light mesons : why are the pseudoscalars so light ? what is the status of the many scalar mesons ? why ideal mixing and zweig rule work so well in some sectors , and not in other sectors ? we refer , e.g. , to @xcite for a critical survey of the claims for exotics , and to @xcite for a thorough discussion within qcd and the bibliography , and to the last hadron conferences for an update @xcite . one of the puzzles arises from the @xmath19 , measured in several experiments , in particular at l3 @xcite : the comparison of the different charge modes suggest a sizeable isospin @xmath20 contribution . there are interesting theoretical studies on the production mechanism @xcite , but missing is a simple understanding of why there is strong attraction in that channel in terms of quark dynamics . there is an intense activity in the search of glueballs and light hybrids , either as supernumerary states with ordinary quantum numbers @xmath21 , or as genuine exotics with @xmath21 that can not be matched by ordinary quantum numbers . in particular , evidence has been found for @xmath22 states between 1 and 2gev@xmath23 by ves at serpukhov@xcite , by e852 at brookhaven @xcite , and by compass at cern @xcite , and the search is resumed actively , in particular by gluex at jlab @xcite . for a thorough review of the other contributions , see , e.g. , @xcite . the charmed mesons @xmath24 , @xmath25 have been discovered shortly after the charmonium , and the mesons with charm and strangeness @xmath26 , @xmath27 have followed . relevant for this review on exotics are the so - called @xmath28 states . as summarised in @xcite , the @xmath29 was discovered at babar @xcite and the @xmath30 at cleo @xcite , with a mass remarkably lower than predicted in the `` bible '' @xcite and in similar quark - model calculations . note that the tuning of the spin - dependent forces in such models has been often debated , and no consensus has ever been reached , see , e.g. , @xcite . to explain the low mass and the properties of the @xmath31 states , the coupling to the nearby @xmath32 thresholds certainly plays a role . these mesons have even been considered as molecules , for instance , in @xcite . after , the discovery of charm , it has been early recognized that configurations including both light and heavy quarks or antiquarks might be particularly interesting , for instance , in the case of baryon - antibaryon or multibaryon systems @xcite . another pioneering contribution was due to isgur and lipkin @xcite who considered the flavour exotic @xmath33 configuration . shortly after , even more exotic mesons were studied , @xmath34 , with two heavy quarks and two light antiquarks . as explained later in this review , their existence is a prediction shared by many theorists using different approaches , which will be discussed in the next sections . doubly - heavy exotics , which are surprisingly omitted in some `` reviews '' on multiquarks , have not yet been searched for in any experiment , but will be one of the goals of future experiments , and several theorists estimated the rate of production at hadron @xcite or electron @xcite colliders , or in the decay of hadrons with beauty @xcite . the production of two charm - anticharm pairs is somewhat disconcerting , with the good surprise of a rather abundant production of double charmonium , leading for instance to the identification of the @xmath35 recoiling against the @xmath12 @xcite , and , on the other hand , the double - charm baryons have not been confirmed in recent experiments , see sec . [ sse : baryons - open2 ] . the spectrum is quarkonia , @xmath36 and @xmath37 , is now rather well known and well understood . for a while , the most delicate experimental sector was the one of spin - singlet states , such as @xmath38 , @xmath39 . for instance , a first candidate for the @xmath40 was announced about 300mev below the @xmath12 , triggering some premature announcements on the quark dynamics , but eventually replaced by a more reasonable @xmath40 about 112mev below @xmath12 , see , e.g. , the reviews @xcite . a first indication for the @xmath41 was given a by @xmath42 formation experiment at cern @xcite , with another indication in a similar experiment at fermilab @xcite . it was eventually firmly identified at cleo @xcite . the @xmath35 was seen at belle in @xmath43 decay @xcite and in double - charmonium production @xcite . it also took some time until the spin - singlet states of @xmath37 were identified @xcite . above the threshold , @xmath44 for charmonium and @xmath45 for bottomonium , the spectrum was known to be more intricate , with broader peaks , and an interplay of @xmath4- and @xmath46-states mixed with the @xmath47 continuum , and it was a somewhat a daily grind to improve the measurements . then came the shock of the discovery of the @xmath48 by belle @xcite , in the @xmath49 mass spectrum of the reaction @xmath50 . neither the mass nor the decay properties were according to the expectations of the charmonium models , in particular for the @xmath51 level . on the other hand , such a state was announced in the molecular models , as discussed in sec . [ sse : molec - xyz ] . not only the experts on quark- or hadron - dynamics commented this new state , but also some non - experts became attracted to the subject . as well summarised in a recent review @xcite , a second shock was the discovery of the @xmath52 by babar @xcite , in @xmath53 with isr .. ] this @xmath54 sector of charmonium was already thoroughly explored , with radial excitations , with @xmath4- and @xmath46-waves mixed between them and with the continuum . so this new state was immediately associated with an exotic , or , say crypto - exotic structure . the @xmath52 was seen also at cleo and belle @xcite . a third shock was the discovery of charged states , with minimal content @xmath55 or c.c . the first announcement was the @xmath56 by the belle collaboration , in the @xmath57 mass distribution of the decay @xmath58 @xcite . it is hardly possible to list all the states of @xmath59 or @xmath60 type without duplicating the very comprehensive reviews such as @xcite . let us stress a few points : * the @xmath61 and @xmath62 have been seen in double - charmonium production @xcite , which gives a clear signature of their @xmath13 content , * some states have been seen in @xmath63 , indicating a charge conjugation @xmath64 , and very likely @xmath65 or @xmath66 . this is the case for @xmath67 , @xmath68 and @xmath69 @xcite . * some states , in particular among the above ones , are just candidates for radial excitations of charmonium . if confirmed , they indicate the supernumerary character of other states sharing the same quantum numbers . * the @xmath70 has been seen as an enhancement in the @xmath71 spectrum of the isr reaction @xmath72 @xcite . many references about this state can be found in a recent paper @xcite . as stressed in this literature , the decay into a baryon and an antibaryon might indicate a `` baryonium '' type of structure , though other scenarios have been proposed @xcite . * there is sometimes a clustering of states with similar masses . it might the same state with a peak that depends on the production and decay process . * most quark models and , to a lesser extent , molecular models predict an isospin @xmath9 partner of the @xmath8 state , analogous to @xmath0 vs. @xmath1 . this stimulated searches for charged partner , such as @xcite . * while the @xmath48 has been seen in many experiments , @xmath52 in a few experiments , some states have been seen in just a single experiment . in between , @xmath73 has been seen by belle and @xcite , but these experiments share many collaborators , and used the same reaction @xmath74 , with a slight variant for the confirmation by cleo @xcite . so , the negative result of a search by compass in photoproduction is particularly important for the existence or at least the coupling properties of this state @xcite . * the lightest @xmath75 states have minimal quark content @xmath76 , where @xmath77 . in several models , their @xmath78 with hidden strangeness are expected . recently , the lhcb collaboration re - analysed the @xmath79 mass spectrum from the decay @xmath80 @xcite , and found evidence for @xmath81 and @xmath82 both with @xmath83 , in disagreement with some models ( cited in @xcite ) and in partial or full agreement with others , in particular the extension by stancu @xcite of the chromomagnetic model proposed for the @xmath48 @xcite . * the models somewhat differ about the existence and location of the @xmath84 analogues of the exotic mesons with hidden charm : the heavier @xmath85-quark mass , for instance , suppresses the chromomagnetic effect but enhances the chromoelectric ones , while the coupling schemes are sensitive to the gap between bare quarkonia and meson pairs . the list of candidates is rather scarce for the time being , and are due to belle only . the charged @xmath86 and @xmath87 have been seen in @xmath88 , where @xmath37 stands here for some lower @xmath89 or @xmath90 or @xmath91 . later , belle also got some candidate for the neutral @xmath92 . on the other hand , a search for the heavy partner of @xmath48 , decaying into @xmath93 or @xmath94 , has been so far unsuccessful . the history of the quark model is intimately linked to baryon spectroscopy . one of the motivation for su(3 ) flavour symmetry , nowadays denoted su(3)@xmath95 , was the observation that the hyperons have properties similar to that of non - strange baryons . the quark model was developed first in the baryon sector , with the pioneering works by greenberg , dalitz , etc . , and pushed very far by the subsequent works by dalitz et al . , hey et al . , isgur and karl , and many others . for a review , see , e.g. , @xcite . obviously , the field has been much enriched by the study of baryons with charm or beauty , and baryons carrying two or three heavy flavoured quarks are eagerly awaited . there are many issues there , that have been presented in conferences such as `` baryons '' , `` nstar '' , etc . for years , one of the most striking issues was the signature for the `` symmetric quark model '' with two degrees of freedom , vs. the quark diquark model . clearly , the recent progress , as e.g. , summarised at the recent conference in tallahassee @xcite , confirms the existence of states such as @xmath96 which can not be accommodated in a naive quark - diquark picture with a frozen diquark . the lightest state with an excitation in each of the jacobi variables , say , @xmath97 and @xmath98 , has isospin @xmath99 , spin @xmath100 and orbital momentum and parity @xmath101 . in the particular case of the harmonic oscillator , its wave function reads @xmath102 and is antisymmetric under the permutations . thus , if associated with an antisymmetric colour wave function @xmath103 and an antisymmetric spin - isospin wave function , it fits perfectly the requirement of fermi statistics . note that an antisymmetric spin - isospin wave function is possible for @xmath99 ( @xmath104 ) , but not for @xmath105 ( @xmath106 ) nor @xmath8 ( @xmath107 ) . experimentally , the search for doubly - excited baryons is difficult . as often underlined ( see , e.g. , @xcite ) photon or meson scattering off a nuclear target favours the production of states with a single quark being excited . and in amplitude analyses , doubly excited baryons , if any , come in a region that is already well populated ! another hot issue is the roper resonance , an excitation with the same quantum numbers as the ground state . in potential models , this is mainly a hyper - radial excitation , but in explicit model calculations , it is found higher than the negative - parity excitation , while the experimental roper state lies degenerate or even slightly below the lowest negative - parity excitation . chiral dynamics , as implemented in specific models or in lattice simulations , accounts for this property , which sets limits to naive potential models . here , again , is the problem of missing states , with slow but continuous progress to fill the holes . a very striking property is the low mass of the @xmath108 , discussed first by dalitz @xcite and now in an abundant literature ( see , e.g. , @xcite for a recent summary ) . in the case of the nucleon spectrum , the spin - orbit splittings , such as between @xmath109 with @xmath110 and @xmath111 with @xmath112 , are very small , and isgur and karl , for instance , have set the spin - orbit potential to zero in their fit @xcite . hence the large @xmath113 splitting of the strange analogues appears as somewhat a surprise in a pure quark model . a minimal solution explains the discrepancy by a shift due the coupling to the nearby @xmath114 threshold . similarly , the @xmath115 is shifted down by the nearby @xmath44 threshold , and the hyperfine splitting @xmath116 is slightly smaller than expected . similarly , the @xmath117 state of charmonium gets some admixture of @xmath118 in conservative models of the @xmath48 , etc . now , a more appealing solution is also suggested , in which there are two poles with @xmath119 near @xmath108 @xcite , a mixing of a @xmath120 molecule and a quark - model state . as often underlined in the case of mesons @xcite , the mixing scheme might be more involved than in ordinary quantum mechanics , with the absorptive part , i.e. , the coupling the decay channels , playing the major role . for years , there has been debates about baryons carrying positive strangeness . in the 60s and 70s , much effort was devoted to exploit the analyticity properties of the @xmath121-matrix , and to reconstruct the amplitudes from the scattering data . this program was rather successful in the case of the @xmath6 and @xmath120 reactions , and led to the identification of a number of baryon resonances with strangeness @xmath122 and @xmath123 , respectively . the case of @xmath124 scattering with @xmath125 was much more delicate and controversial . some early analyses , based only on differential cross - sections ( and just a few data on the recoil polarisation ) , suggested the possibility of resonances , see , for instance , @xcite . the resonances were named @xmath126 or @xmath127 , where @xmath8 or @xmath128 is the isospin . then came data on the analysing power , obtained using a polarised target , as in @xcite . not surprisingly , the uncertainties were narrowed @xcite , and the @xmath60 resonances tended to fade away . for years , the particle data group ( pdg ) , summarised the state of art , as in the 1980 edition @xcite , where one finds candidates for several exotic baryons with @xmath125 . there are @xmath129 and @xmath130 in the isospin @xmath8 sector , and @xmath131 , @xmath132 and @xmath133 for @xmath9 . then the @xmath60 baryon disappeared from the review , and the letter @xmath60 was given to another particle . note that other risky amplitudes analyses were done later , for instance for @xmath134 or @xmath135 before the advent of data taken on the polarised target , or for the elastic @xmath42 scattering with just data on the polarisation , while the simpler @xmath136 case notoriously requires several spin observables . act two of the play is better known . meanwhile the name `` pentaquark '' was introduced in the anticharmed sector , as will be discussed shortly , in sec . [ sse : antich - baryons ] . it reflects that the minimal content of the @xmath126 baryon is @xmath137 . in 2003 , nakano et al . found a narrow peak in the @xmath138 distribution of the reaction @xmath139 this state , named @xmath140 , was predicted in a model by diakonov et al . @xcite based on some developments of the chiral dynamics . it was of course rather remarkable to have a relatively small experiment revealing a major discovery . but the sequels quickly went out of control . on the theory side , a flurry of papers , with hasty calculations and ad - hoc assumptions . on the experimental side , some collaborations discovered that they had data on tape , that were never analysed , and contained in fact the pentaquark ! other positive results came , both for the @xmath141 , and for other members of the anti - decuplet of su(3)@xmath95 that was predicted . however , the trend became inverted , and experiments with better statistics and particle identification did not confirm the existence of the these light pentaquarks . this is reviewed for instance in @xcite . the theory part also came under better scrutiny . in ref . @xcite , some lattice qcd calculations following the discovery of the @xmath141 are criticised . in , e.g. , @xcite , some inconsistencies are pointed out in the estimate of the width in the model of diakonov et al . , a crucial property of the putative light pentaquark . in the last 20 years , much experimental progress has been done in the sector of baryons with single charm or beauty . when available , the comparison of @xmath85- and @xmath142-baryons is compatible with the idea of a flavour - independent confinement . for instance , the first evidence for @xmath143 came from d0 at fermilab , with a mass about @xmath144mev , corresponding to a double - strangeness excitation @xmath145 substantially larger than its charm analogue . further measurements by cdf at fermilab and lhcb at cern gave a mass around @xmath146 in closer agreement with the expectations @xcite . a remarkable feature of charmed baryons is their narrowness , with , e.g. , @xmath147mev for @xmath148 , @xmath149mev for @xmath150 , @xmath151mev for @xmath152 @xcite . of course , this gives a better view on the spectrum than in the case of overlapping resonances . an optimistic columnist of pdg @xcite even stated : `` models of baryon - resonance spectroscopy should now _ start _ with the narrow charmed baryons , and work back to those broad old resonances . '' among the current discussions , there is the suggestion that @xmath153 is mainly a @xmath154 molecule @xcite . the same narrowness is observed for @xmath85-baryons , as listed in the latest pdg review @xcite or revealed in the latest lhcb papers @xcite . thirty years ago , double charm baryons were considered as just a straightforward extension of the quark model , to be checked just for the sake of completeness . at most , some experts stressed the co - existence within the same hadron of the slow , adiabatic , charmonium - like motion of the two heavy quarks , and the fast , @xmath24-meson - like motion of the light quark around them . in the literature , @xmath155 is often described as a quark - diquark @xcite ; however , the first excitations occur between the two heavy quarks and thus one has to introduce `` excited diquarks '' . an alternative is the born - oppenheimer method @xcite , which , as discussed later , might also be adequate in the @xmath75 sector and for hybrids . some evidence for double - charm baryons was found at fermilab , in the selex experiment @xcite , but unfortunately not confirmed in other experiments at fermilab or elsewhere @xcite . this becomes particularly annoying . double - charm baryons will certainly receive more attention in the near future @xcite . it is an important question to understand why double - charm baryons have not yet been seen . if the golden modes such as @xmath156 or @xmath157 are suppressed , the detection scheme should be revised . and , perhaps , new production mechanisms should be exploited . our ability to detect double - charm baryons and measure their properties is eagerly watched by people waiting for exotic tetraquarks and dibaryons . as pointed out in @xcite , the binding and the correlation of the two charmed quarks in @xmath155 gives some idea about @xmath158 and @xmath159 . and , in most production experiments , they share the same triggers , so that a simultaneous search for double - charm baryons , mesons and dibaryons can be envisaged . two simultaneous papers by gignoux et al . and lipkin @xcite , in which the word `` pentaquark '' was first used , suggested the existence of stable or metastable states @xmath160 with @xmath161 denoting @xmath162 , @xmath163 or @xmath164 . this pentaquark was searched for in an experiment at fermilab , which was not conclusive @xcite . at the time of the light pentaquark , the h1 collaboration at hera looked at the @xmath165 mass spectrum , i.e. , states of minimal content @xmath166 , without strangeness contrary to the prediction in @xcite , and found a peak near 3.1gev with a width of about 12mev @xcite , which was confirmed neither by zeus @xcite , also operating at hera , nor by babar @xcite at slac , nor in the analysis by h1 of their heraslowromancap2@ data . the anticharmed pentaquark was initially one the goals of the compass experiment @xcite , but it has disappeared from the agenda . this is one of the latest findings , inducing an intense phenomenological activity supplementing the discussions about @xmath75 mesons . the rumour is that , due to the bad reputation of the light pentaquark , the lhcb collaboration tried during months to kill the evidence , with more checks than usual for this type of discovery . the result published in @xcite deals with the weak decay @xmath167 of the lowest baryon with beauty . the dalitz plot , as well as the @xmath168 mass spectrum , indicates two peaks , one with a mass of @xmath169mev and a width of @xmath170mev , an another with a mass of @xmath171mev and a width of @xmath172mev . as the @xmath173 mass is always reconstructed , some ambiguities are removed . the background is fitted as @xmath174 , with many @xmath175 excitations , up to high mass and high spin . when two resonances are added , the preferred quantum numbers are spin @xmath176 and @xmath177 , and opposite parities , namely @xmath178 and @xmath179 . see , also , @xcite . the process is schematically described in fig . [ fig : lhcb - penta1a ] , as well as the companion reaction ( cabibbo suppressed ) @xmath180 . decay ( left ) and @xmath180 decay ( right),title="fig : " ] decay ( left ) and @xmath180 decay ( right),title="fig : " ] this process @xmath180 has been measured by lhcb and published before the discovery of hidden - charm pentaquarks @xcite , but the statistics was not sufficient to identify peaks . this reaction has been discussed in a few papers , as well as other weak decays involving the hidden - charm pentaquark @xcite , shown in fig . [ fig : lhcb - penta2 ] . a more recent analysis of the reaction @xmath180 provides some support for the contribution of hidden - charm pentaquarks @xcite . -hadrons producing a hidden - charm pentaquark.,title="fig : " ] -hadrons producing a hidden - charm pentaquark.,title="fig : " ] it has been proposed @xcite to check the existence of the lhcb pentaquarks and provide more information on their properties by studying the photoproduction reaction @xmath181 , and the experiment will be done at jlab . the situation in the non - strange sector has been recently reviewed at the conference baryon 2016 @xcite . there are regularly some claims for resonant behaviour of some partial waves @xcite . negative results include : @xcite in the isospin @xmath20 sector , @xcite for multineutrons bound by a few @xmath182 . the most serious candidates are the state of mass 2380mev and width @xmath183mev by the wasa collaboration , in the @xmath184 coupled partial waves , corresponding to @xmath185 @xcite , which was expected by various models @xcite , and the more recent state at 2.15gev which is under investigation at jlab @xcite . in the sector of single strangeness @xmath123 , there are recurrent discussions about the possibility of dibaryons . see , e.g. , @xcite and refs . there . note that a study of the atomic @xmath186 system could provide some indirect information . in the two - body case , say @xmath187 , the atomic spectrum is much modified if the strong - interaction @xmath188 potential generates a bound state near threshold . this was realised by zeldovich in the 50 s and has been much studied @xcite . the case of three - body exotic atoms with a combination of coulomb interaction and short - range hadronic interaction remains to be clarified , but probably deserves a detailed study . the most advertised case deals with strangeness @xmath189 , following the work by jaffe@xcite on the coherent chromomagnetic attraction in @xmath190 with isospin and spin @xmath191 . more than 20 experiments have searched without success for the @xmath192 , ranging from the absence of @xmath192 in the decay of double hypernuclei @xcite to the mass spectra emerging from heavy - ion collisions @xcite . new experiments are currently under construction . the status of theoretical studies will be reviewed in sec . [ ssse : chromo ] . the speculations have been extended to the @xmath193 sector , see , e.g. , @xcite . if the @xmath192 , considered as @xmath194 system , is close to binding , as well as some other baryon - baryon systems , it is natural to guess that some multi - baryon configurations will be bound , as an illustration of the quantum phenomenon of borromean binding @xcite . there are for instance debates about the existence of @xmath195 or @xmath196 @xcite , as well as @xmath197 or @xmath198 @xcite . the field of hypernuclear physics is rather active , with new facilities contributing , and is reviewed regularly at dedicated conferences . almost immediately after the discovery of charm , the possibility of new species of hypernuclei was envisaged , with hyperons replaced by charmed baryons @xcite . in atomic physics , the study of multi - electron systems looks at first rather straightforward : the same non relativistic dynamics is at work , and one has `` just '' to solve the @xmath199-body equations with increasing @xmath199 . even there , the progress is slow , and the calculations , which are very delicate , have to be cross - checked . for instance , the last bound state of h@xmath200 , the excitations of the positronium molecule or the existence of borromean molecules were discovered only recently @xcite . in nuclear physics , the situation is even more delicate , as the basic two - body interaction is presumably modified by the presence of other nucleons , and supplemented by 3-body forces . in qcd , the situation is even worse . if one uses simple constituent models to describe mesons and baryons , their extension to multiquark states is hazardous . if one uses more sophisticated approaches to ordinary hadrons , their application to higher configurations becomes technically very difficult . before discussing in some details a few specific schemes , we review the early history of exotic hadrons . in the 60s , much attention was paid to _ crossing symmetry _ , which relates , e.g. , @xmath201 to @xmath202 . the reaction @xmath203 describes what is exchanged to monitor the direct reaction @xmath204 . it is reasonable to assume an equivalence between the content of the two reactions , as well as that of the third reaction , @xmath205 . this principle of _ duality _ was often used as a constraint in building models . for instance , if one describes @xmath6 elastic scattering with several @xmath206 and @xmath207 resonances , duality dictates to refrain from exchanging @xmath208 , @xmath0 , , in the @xmath209-channel . a consequence of duality is that is the reaction @xmath204 is weak , i.e. , without resonances , it does not benefit from coherent @xmath209-channel exchanges . though duality was first formulated at the hadron level , it is nowadays explained in terms of quark diagrams . we refer to @xcite for a review and references . for instance , in the case of @xmath2 scattering with isospin @xmath8 , the diagram of fig . [ fig : dual1 ] ( left ) shows that the possibility of annihilating a quar - antiquark pair opens the way for @xmath210 exchange in the @xmath209-channel and @xmath210 resonances in the @xmath4-channel . this is why there is a strong @xmath2 interaction with @xmath8 . on the other hand , for isospin @xmath20 , there is @xmath4-channel resonance , and the @xmath209-channel dynamics suffers from a more intricate topology . similarly , @xmath120 scattering , shown in fig . [ fig : dual1 ] ( right ) , benefits from both @xmath211 resonances in the @xmath4-channel and @xmath210 exchanges in the @xmath209-channel . this is not the case for @xmath114 scattering which is notoriously less strong . this led rosner to address the problem of baryon - antibaryon scattering @xcite , which is depicted in fig . [ fig : dual2 ] . the interaction is very strong , and benefits , indeed , from the exchanges of mesons in the @xmath209-channel . hence there should be resonances in the @xmath4-channel . this is how baryonium was predicted . -channel ( intersecting the dotted line ) contains two quarks and two antiquarks . the intermediate state in the @xmath209-channel ( crossing the dashed line ) is made of a quark and antiquark . ] as noted by roy @xcite , once one accepts baryonium , in a _ gedankenexperiment _ colliding a baryonium against a baryon , meson - exchange is dual of a pentaquark . in turn , the analysis of pentaquark - baryon scattering implies the existence of dibaryons ! this is illustrated in fig . [ fig : dual3 ] . -channel ) dual of mesons ( quark - antiquark in the @xmath209-channel ) in baryonium - baryon scattering . right : dibaryon ( six quarks in the @xmath4-channel ) dual of mesons ( quark - antiquark in the @xmath209-channel ) in pentaquark - baryon scattering.,title="fig:"]-channel ) dual of mesons ( quark - antiquark in the @xmath209-channel ) in baryonium - baryon scattering . right : dibaryon ( six quarks in the @xmath4-channel ) dual of mesons ( quark - antiquark in the @xmath209-channel ) in pentaquark - baryon scattering.,title="fig : " ] in line with duality , a string model was developed for hadrons , explaining why the squared masses increase linearly with the spin @xmath17 . this model was echoed by the elongated version of the bag model , the flux - tube model , or some potential models with multi - body forces which will be mentioned later in this section . the string model was first rather empirical , but later received a support from some topological and non - perturbative properties of qcd , as reviewed recently @xcite . the mesons are pictured as a string linking a quark to antiquark , see fig . [ fig : string1 ] ( left ) . the picture of baryons was suggested by artru , and rediscovered in several approaches @xcite . it consists of three strings linking each quark to a junction @xmath17 , which plays somewhat the role of a fourth constituent of each baryon , and , in particular , is submitted to an extension of the zweig rule , which prohibits any internal junction - junction annihilation . in this scheme , the baryonium of rosner contains two junctions , see fig . [ fig : string2 ] and thus widely differs from a set of two disconnected mesons . the decay of baryonium occurs by string breaking via pair creation : in the case of an external leg , it corresponds to the pionic cascade @xmath212 , while the breaking of the central string corresponds to the decay into baryon and antibaryon . several experimental states were good candidates for baryonium @xcite , but they were not confirmed in experiments using better antiproton beams . perhaps the nucleon - antinucleon interaction suffers from too strong an annihilation , while the heavy quark sector gives better opportunities . the model can be extended to more complicated structures , as to include pentaquarks and dibaryons . some examples are given in fig . [ fig : string3 ] . the above string pictures of baryonium was challenged by other schemes : the nuclear model which is reviewed in the next section , and some quark models . one of them describes baryonium states as a diquark and an antidiquark separated by an orbital barrier which suppresses the decay into mesons @xcite . in colour chemistry , there is also the possibility of colour - sextet diquark , and thus of @xmath213 states , named ` mock baryonia' which are predicted to be rather narrow @xcite . this was , indeed , an interesting challenge to identify spectroscopic signatures of the colour degree of freedom . the name has evolved . it used to be _ quasi - nuclear _ , and became _ molecular _ model . it starts with the observation that the meson - exchange interaction of yukawa , which successfully binds the deuteron and other nuclei , holds for other hadrons , in particular these containing light quarks . in the 60s , attempts have been made to describe mesons as baryon - antibaryon states , a simplified version of the bootstrap . fermi and yang @xcite had noticed that the @xmath214 potential is often more attractive than the @xmath215 one , as the cancellations in the latter become coherences in the former . but this approach does not account for some important properties of the meson spectrum @xcite , such as exchange degeneracy , e.g. , the @xmath0 and @xmath1 having the same mass . in the late 70s and early 80s , another point of view was adopted , namely that baryon - antibaryon bound states and resonances correspond to new type of mesons , lying higher in mass than ordinary mesons , and preferentially coupled to the baryon - antibaryon channel . in practice , the @xmath214 potential is deduced from the @xmath215 one by the @xmath216-parity rule : if the exchange of a meson @xmath217 ( or set of mesons @xmath217 ) contributes as @xmath218 to the @xmath215 potential in isospin @xmath219 , then its contributes as @xmath220 to the @xmath214 in isospin @xmath219 @xcite . when annihilation is neglected , a rich spectrum of bound states and resonances is found @xcite , with the hope than some of them will not become too broad when annihilation is switched on . before the discovery of the antiproton , annihilation was believed to be be a short - range correction . however , the annihilation part of the @xmath214 integrated cross - section was measured to be about twice the elastic one . to fit the cross- sections , one needs an annihilation acting up to about @xmath221fm , and this makes most quasi - nuclear baryonium states very broad . the molecular model might have better chances to predict exotics in channels with heavy hadrons whose interaction is less absorptive . the yukawa model made a come back in the heavy quark sector . the @xmath222 or @xmath223 potential , where @xmath224 , is perhaps weaker than the @xmath215 potential , but being experienced by heavier particles , it can produce binding as well . the first papers were by okun and voloshin and glashow et al . @xcite . in the latter case , the idea was to explain some intriguing properties of some high - lying charmonium states , but it was eventually realised that these properties were due to the nodes of the wave function when the states are described as radial excitations @xcite . the best known application of the molecular model deals with @xmath75 states . almost simultaneously , a few papers came , stressing the attraction due to one - pion - exchange in some @xmath222 or @xmath223 channels @xcite . of course , the @xmath48 discovery at belle was greeted as a success of this approach . today , the @xmath48 is generally considered as having both a quarkonium and a multiquark component @xcite . for a clarification of the molecular approach , see @xcite . the anticharmed pentaquark has been studied with molecular dynamics , as a light baryon linked to an anticharmed meson . see , for instance , @xcite . note that the @xmath225 or @xmath163 and @xmath164 content of the light sector in the chromomagnetic model is not necessarily the same when mesons are exchanged between a @xmath226 or a @xmath227 and a baryon . after the publication of the lhcb results on the hidden - charm pentaquark @xcite , it was reminded or discovered that there were some predictions of bound states of a charmed baryon and an anticharmed meson , in particular by hofman and lutz @xcite , oset and collaborators @xcite , and z.c . yang et al . the game was even initiated earlier for the case of hidden - strangeness @xcite . of course , the model has been refined recently and compared to the lhcb results . the literature is comprehensively reviewed in @xcite . one might wonder why the hidden - charm pentaquark was not searched for before , given the above predictions . 1 . there are many predictions vs. just a few experiments , which are not primarily devoted to spectroscopy . 2 . in the molecular model , there are many states of this type , and it is not easy to focus on the configuration giving the best signature for the molecular dynamics . for instance , the binding of a charmed baryon and an anticharmed antibaryon was already envisaged in 1977 @xcite , shortly after the meson - meson case @xcite , but he meson - baryon case was unfortunately overlooked in the 70s . 3 . there is rather generally more effort and more interest in the meson than in the baryon sector . the negative parity states , either @xmath112 or @xmath228 , can be accommodated in the molecular model , with a main @xmath4-wave between a meson and a baryon , and a small admixture of @xmath46-wave , as in the more familiar case of the deuteron . the orbital excitation with positive parity is probably much higher in mass . in @xmath223 , the annihilation and creation of light quarks opens a coupling to @xmath13 , leading to description of some isoscalar @xmath75 states as a mixture of molecule and quarkonium states . isovector states do not mix with quarkonium , except for some minor effects of isospin violation . the sector of double - charm molecules has also received much attention , from the very beginning . see for instance , @xcite . it is immediately realised that if the exchange of mesons bind @xmath222 , @xmath223 , and @xmath229 their beauty or mixed charm - beauty analogues and other configurations could as well be formed by this mechanism , such as some meson - baryon and baryon - baryon states @xcite . we already mentioned the prediction of hidden - charm pentaquarks as molecules such as @xmath230 , before their discovery by lhcb . one could also include @xmath231 or @xmath232-nuclei states , see , e.g. , @xcite , where the possibility of @xmath233 states is also envisaged . the non - strange heavy pentaquark @xmath234 is related to the non - confirmed state claimed by h1 @xcite . in particular , there are many studies of bound states of charmed or doubly - charmed baryons with nucleons or with other singly or doubly charmed baryons @xcite . one can even speculate about a new periodic table , where the proton is replaced by @xmath235 and the neutron by @xmath236 @xcite . of course some rearrangement into triple charm and single charm should be taken into account . in several model calculations , many interesting hadron - hadron systems are estimated at the edge between binding and non - binding . this means that 3-body or larger systems are probably bound as long as they are not suppressed by the fermi statistics . so , accounting for the @xmath75 states implies many other states . in qcd , the gluon field carries a colour charge and coupled to itself . this lead to speculations about the existence of new neutral states , made essentially of gluons , except for @xmath237 loop corrections . this was sometimes hotly debated . i remember for instance that in his talk at the thessaloniki conference on antiprotons , van hove expressed doubts about the necessity of glueballs within qcd , though the written version was somewhat softened @xcite . the estimates for the mass and even the quantum numbers of the lightest glueball or gluonium has somewhat changed during the years . the situation is now stabilised , and is reviewed , e.g. , in @xcite . note that the lowest glueballs with unusual quantum numbers , such as @xmath238 , are sometimes found with rather high masses @xcite . another sector that used to be rather fashionable is the one of hybrids . very schematically , hybrids combine quark(s ) , antiquark(s ) and gluons . there are even explicit constituent models in which the constituent gluon is given a mass , and interacts via an effective potential , see , e.g. , @xcite . the first approaches describes hybrids as an excitation of the string or , say , of the gluon field linking the quarks . some pioneering attempts can be found in @xcite . in @xcite , a born - oppenheimer treatment was made , with a variant of the bag model used to estimate the energy of the gluon field . for a given interquark separation , the shape of the bag is adjusted as to give the lowest gluon energy . the ground state of the gluon field provide with the usual quarkonium potential . the first excited state of the gluon field is linked to the effective @xmath239 potential within a hybrid . the first @xmath240 hybrid was predicted near 4.0gev , and this estimate has been much refined with the bag model replaced by more elaborate lattice calculations @xcite , or effective field theory @xcite . note that in the late 70s and early 80s , the motivation was that the hybrids would show up clearly atop a clean and well - understood charmonium spectrum ! with the proliferation of @xmath75 states , we realise today that identifying hybrids is a little more challenging . the method of qcd sum rules ( qcdsr ) is a very ambitious and efficient approach , initiated by shifman , vainshtein and zakharov @xcite , allowing an interpolation between the rigorous perturbative regime and the long - range regime . for a review , see , e.g. , @xcite . it was first applied to ground - state mesons . there is no limitation , in principle , but the numerical stability become more and more delicate for excitations with the same quantum numbers as the ground state ( say , radial excitations ) . for baryons , the choice of the most appropriate operator is not unique , and triggered some debates . this is of course even more delicate for multiquarks . hence , the choice of the strategy is often dictated by models , such a diquark - antidiquark . a few groups have applied qcdsr to exotic states , in particular at montpellier , so paulo and peking , see , e.g. , @xcite for examples of early attempts , and @xcite for some reviews of the state of art over the years . needless to say that qcdsr calculations of multiquark exotics are extremely delicate and require weeks of cross - checks . so any overnight analysis published just after the release of a new experimental state should have been anticipated long in advance . lattice qcd ( lqcd ) is well known and well advertised , and hardly needs to be presented . for an introduction to the recent literature , see , e.g. , @xcite . dramatic progress have been accomplished on various aspects of strong interaction . there are interesting recent developments , for instance to study how the results behave numerically and have to depend theoretically on the pion mass . another extension deals with _ ab - initio _ nuclear physics , at least for light nuclei , and multiquark physics @xcite , with in particular , a renewed interest in the study of the @xmath192 dibaryon . in the sector of heavy quark spectroscopy , lqcd has confirmed many important results obtained by simpler , but empirical , tools . for instance , the @xmath13 interaction of charmonium , including its spin dependence , has been estimated , in agreement with the current potential models . latter , the charmonium spectrum was calculated directly . as already mentioned , some decisive contributions were made for the study of hybrid mesons with hidden heavy flavour @xcite . a born - oppenheimer potential can be computed for other configurations , e.g. , double - charm baryons , and lqcd is very suited for the treatment of the light degrees of freedom . for multiquarks , pure _ ab - initio _ studies are preceded by preliminary investigations inspired by models . for instance , in the sector of doubly - heavy mesons , an effective @xmath241 potential or an effective @xmath242 or @xmath243 interaction has been studied see , e.g. , @xcite . nowadays , multiquark states are often studied directly on the lattice , without the intermediate step of an effective potential . needless to say , lqcd faces difficulties as qcdsr , for the study of multiquark states . in the early days , the quantum numbers were not always clearly identified , and the genuine states were cleanly separated from the artefacts due to lattice boundaries . nowadays , the field is mature , and an impressive program of multiquark and multihadron physics has been developed by several groups @xcite . in this section , we briefly survey some phenomenological models which have been used to predict some exotic hadrons or describe them after their discovery . it should be stressed , indeed , that if these models are more empirical than qcdsr and lqcd , they can be adapted more flexibly to describe the world of ordinary hadrons and used to extrapolate towards novel structures . in the 70s , the hyperfine splitting among hadron multiplet was interpreted as the qcd analogue of the breit - fermi interaction in qed , namely the spin dependent part of the one - gluon exchange @xcite . the corresponding hyperfine interaction reads @xmath244 to be treated at first order , otherwise it requires some regularisation in the channels where it is attractive . a tensor term also contributes beyond @xmath4-waves . in 1977 , jaffe applied this hamiltonian to the configuration @xmath190 with @xmath191 assuming _ i ) _ su(3)@xmath95 flavour symmetry , and _ ii ) _ that the short - range correlation @xmath245 has the same value as for ordinary baryons @xcite . he found a remarkable coherence in the spin - colour operator , with @xmath246 for @xmath192 , to be compared to @xmath247 for @xmath199 or @xmath248 , i.e. , @xmath249 for the @xmath194 threshold . this means that the @xmath192 is bound below the @xmath194 threshold by half the @xmath7-@xmath199 splitting , about @xmath250mev . the @xmath192 was searched for in many experiments , without success so far . for instance , the double hypernucleus @xmath251[\lambda\lambda]{he}$ ] @xcite was not seen decaying into @xmath252 . the model has been reexamined thoroughly @xcite , with the result that any correction tends to reduce the binding , and eventually , the @xmath192 is pushed in the continuum . these corrections are : su(3)@xmath95 breaking , more realistic estimate of the short - short correlation ( a dibaryon is more dilute than a baryon ) , and proper inclusion of the full hamiltonian ( kinetic energy and spin - independent confinement besides @xmath253 ) . of course , some additional attraction such a scalar - isoscalar exchange between the two @xmath248 can restore the binding . meanwhile , some other configurations were found , for which the chromomagnetic interaction , if alone , induces binding . in 1987 , the grenoble group and h.j . lipkin @xcite proposed independently and simultaneously a heavy pentaquark @xmath254 , where @xmath255 or @xmath164 . with the same hypotheses as jaffe s for the @xmath192 , and assuming an infinite mass for the heavy antiquark @xmath256 , they found an optimal @xmath257 , to be compared to @xmath247 for the threshold @xmath258 , i.e. , the same binding energy @xmath250mev . in a series of papers @xcite , leandri and silvestre - brac applied the chromomagnetic operator @xmath259 with suitable changes for antiquarks , to a variety of configurations , and found several cases , for which the chromomagnetic interaction , if alone , induces binding . as noted by lichtenberg @xcite , the @xmath260 dependence is somewhat extreme , as heavy quarks give more compact wave - functions with larger short - range correlation factor . this led some authors to adopt a more empirical prescription , @xmath261 where the coefficients are taken from a fit to ordinary mesons and baryons @xcite . for instance , in the case of @xmath262 with @xmath83 , the diagonalisation of , supplemented by effective constituent masses , gives a state which corresponds nicely to the mass and properties of the @xmath48 . its narrowness comes from being almost a pure octet - octet state of colour in the channels @xmath263 . as most approaches based on quark dynamics , the chromomagnetic model predicts an isospin @xmath9 partner of @xmath48 , with @xmath264 and @xmath64 for the neutral , which is not yet seen experimentally . [ [ the - role - of - flavour - independence ] ] the role of flavour independence + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + in constituent models , one can switch off the spin - dependent part of the interaction , and study the limit of a pure central potential . its main property is _ flavour independence _ , with some interesting consequences , which are independent of the detailed shape of the interaction . in particular , if a constituent mass increases , the kinetic energy decreases , and one gets a lower energy , or , say , more binding . this explains why the @xmath15 family has more bound states than the @xmath265 family below the open - flavour threshold . another well - studied consequence deals with doubly - heavy tetraquarks @xmath266 . the 4-body system benefits from the heavy - heavy interaction , which is absent in the @xmath267 threshold . hence , for a large enough @xmath268-to-@xmath269 mass ratio , the system becomes stable . explicit calculations with a colour - additive model @xmath270 normalised to the quarkonium potential @xmath271 , indicates that in such spin - independent interaction , @xmath158 is probably unbound , but @xmath272 stable @xcite . one hardly finds similar configurations . if , for instance , one considers @xmath273 within , there is no obvious gain with respect to the best threshold made of two baryons , but flavour independence dictates that before any spin corrections , the threshold @xmath274 is lower than @xmath275 . the stability of @xmath266 for large mass ratios is intimately related to the observation that the hydrogen molecule is more deeply bound ( in units of the threshold binding energy ) than the equal - mass molecules such as ps@xmath276 . the hamiltonian for @xmath277 reads @xmath278\\ { } + \left(\frac{1}{4\,m}-\frac{1}{4\,m}\right ) \left({\boldsymbol{p}}_1 ^ 2+{\boldsymbol{p}}_2 ^ 2-{\boldsymbol{p}}_3 ^ 2-{\boldsymbol{p}}_4 ^ 2\right)~. \end{gathered}\ ] ] its @xmath279-breaking term @xmath280 lowers the ground - state energy with respect to the @xmath279-even part @xmath281 . since @xmath281 , a rescaled version of the ps@xmath276 molecule , and @xmath192 , have the same threshold , and since ps@xmath276 is stable , h@xmath276 is even more stable . clearly , the coulomb character of @xmath282 hardly matters in this reasoning . the key property is that the potential does not change when the masses are modified . in the case of a simple spin - independent potential with the colour - additive rule , one does not get binding for @xmath283 , but binding shows up when @xmath284 increases . note that , if one breaks the symmetry of ps@xmath276 differently and considers instead @xmath285 configurations , stability is lost for @xmath286 , or , of course , @xmath287 @xcite . a protonium atom can not polarise strongly enough a positronium atom and attach it . similarly a chromoelectric potential can not produce a bound @xmath288 tetraquark : one needs chromomagnetism or long - range yukawa interaction . [ [ more - detailed - comparison - of - ps_2-and - tetraquark ] ] more detailed comparison of ps@xmath276 and tetraquark + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + another problem is to understand why the positronium molecule ps@xmath276 ( neglecting annihilation ) lies slightly below its dissociation threshold , while a chromo - electric model , associated with the colour - additive rule , does not bind ( at least according to most computations , an exception being @xcite ) . this is due to a larger disorder in the colour coefficients than in the electrostatic strength factors @xmath289 entering the coulomb potential in ps@xmath276 . consider , indeed , a 4-body hamiltonian scaled to @xmath290={\boldsymbol{p}}_1 ^ 2+{\boldsymbol{p}}_2 ^ 2+{\boldsymbol{p}}_3 ^ 2+{\boldsymbol{p}}_4 ^ 2 + \sum_{i < j } g_{ij}\,v(r_{ij})~ , \qquad g=\{g_{ij}\}~,\ ] ] with @xmath291 , having at least one bound state in the symmetric case @xmath292 for which @xmath293 @xmath294 . the variational principle , with the solution of this symmetric case as a trial function , implies that @xmath295)\le \min(h[g_0])~,\ ] ] so that , schematically , the more asymmetric the distribution @xmath216 , the lower the ground - state energy . for the cases of interest , one could be more precise , as the distribution is of the type @xmath296 . the ground - state energy @xmath297 is convex as a function of @xmath298 , and , since maximal at @xmath299 , it is convexly decreasing as a function of @xmath300 for both @xmath301 and @xmath302 . if one compares two values of @xmath298 with opposite sign , then it is a good guess , but not a rigorous statement , to say that the larger @xmath300 , the lower the energy , as @xmath297 is nearly parabolic near @xmath299 . now consider the actual values in table [ tab : coeff - tetra ] . .strength coefficients for the positronium molecule and the tetraquark states with colour wave - function @xmath303 or @xmath304 , as well as for their threshold . the list of coefficients is of the type @xmath305 after suitable renumbering , and summarised as @xmath306 , where @xmath307 is the symmetric case @xmath308 . [ tab : coeff - tetra ] [ cols="^,^,^,^,^",options="header " , ] the asymmetry parameter @xmath300 is much larger for ps@xmath276 than for @xmath309 . this explains why the positronium molecule is bound . means that ps@xmath276 benefits from correlation and anticorrelation effects in the various pairs . ] a tetraquark with a pure @xmath310 colour structure has its asymmetry parameter smaller than that of the threshold and has the same sign , so this toy model is rigorously unbound . for @xmath304 , the signs are different , and the magnitude are comparable , so the analysis is more delicate . we note that @xmath311 for ps@xmath276 results in a fragile binding , so it is not surprising that @xmath312 leaves @xmath304 unbound in numerical studies . to summarise , the tetraquark is penalised by the non - abelian character of the colour algebra in the simple model , and its stability can not rely on the asymmetries of the potential energy . it should use other asymmetries , in particular through the masses entering the kinetic energy , or spin effects , or mixing of @xmath310 and @xmath313 , or the coupling to decay channels , etc . [ [ string - dynamics-1 ] ] string dynamics + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + the prescription is of course rather crude , as it treats colour as a global variable similar to isospin , and assumes arbitrarily the choice of a pairwise interaction . it can be justified in the limiting cases were @xmath314 quarks are clustered and the last quark isolated . so it might provide a reasonable interpolation for other spatial configurations . as mentioned earlier , an alternative is the @xmath315-shape interaction of fig . [ fig : string1 ] , now used to estimate a potential which reads @xmath316 if @xmath317 is the linear confinement of mesons . note that features the minimal path linking three points , an old problem first raised by fermat and torricelli . and the value of the minimal sum of distances @xcite . ] for baryons alone , solving the 3-quark problem with instead of the perimeter - based confinement @xmath318 is technically more involved , but does not change the patterns of the excitation spectrum . for tetraquarks , a precursor of non - pairwise potential was the flip - flop model @xcite , with quadratic confinement . in the more recent linear version , one takes the minimum of the two possible meson - meson pairing configurations and the connected diagram shown in fig . [ fig : tetra - string ] . the good surprise is that this potential is more attractive than the one deduced from the colour - additive rule and thus is more favourable for binding @xcite . the same property is observed for the pentaquark @xcite , fig . [ fig : penta - string ] , the dibaryon , fig . [ fig : hexa - string ] and the system made of 3 quarks and 3 antiquarks @xcite , fig . [ fig:3q-3qbar - string ] . however , this string potential corresponds to a kind of born - oppenheimer approximation for the colour fluxes at given quark positions . it mixes colour @xmath319 and @xmath320 for any pair of quark , to optimise the overall energy . thus it holds for quarks bearing different flavours . in @xcite , an attempt is proposed to combine quark statistics and string dynamics in the case of tetraquarks with identical quarks or antiquarks : not surprisingly , the possibility of binding is reduced . + note that in the above potential models , there is no explicit junction _ la _ rossi and veneziano : the minimal length is the only guidance , and nothing refrain a transition from a disconnected flip - flop to a connected string . it is observed , however , that the ground - state uses mainly the flip - flop term , so there are probably two classes of states : the lowest have the same number of junctions as the thrshold , and thus are rather broad if the fall - apart decay is energetically allowed . the second class might be higher in mass , but benefits from a kind of metastability due to its junction content . these string - inspired potentials , however simplistic , have motivated some studies . for instance , the literature on steiner trees helps in optimising the location of the junctions and the estimate of the minimal strength @xcite . as discussed at length in sec . [ sse : chromoelectric ] , the tetraquark @xmath266 might become stable by the sole effect of chromomagnetic forces , but the stability requires a very large @xmath284 mass ratio . it was also noticed @xcite , that some configurations such as @xmath83 , there is a favourable spin - spin interaction in the light sector that benefits the tetraquark and not the threshold . a calculation by rosina et al . @xcite , using a potential tuned to fit the ordinary hadrons , and the colour - additive rule , demonstrated stability for @xmath321 , and this was confirmed by vijande et al . there are not too many similar configurations , in which both chromoelectric and chromomagnetic effects are favourable . for instance , for the doubly - flavoured dibaryons @xmath273 , the two thresholds @xmath274 and @xmath322 are nearly degenerate , at least in case the charm , @xmath323 . the former threshold benefits from the chromoelectric attraction between the two heavy quarks , while the second can receive a favourable chromomagnetic interaction . it is , however , difficult for the 6-quark configuration to combine astutely the two effects , and double - charm baryons seem hardly stable in constituent models @xcite . once a model is adopted , typically @xmath324~,\ ] ] or a more complicated model involving multi - body forces , one is left with solving the wave equation to obtain the energies and the wavefunctions . in the case of quarkonium , there are dozens of reliable numerical methods , starting with the one proposed by hartree @xcite , consisting of matching a regular outgoing solution and a regular incoming solution of the radial equation . most methods can be extended to the case of coupled equations in the unnatural - parity channels , similar to the @xmath325 coupling of the deuteron in nuclear physics . many rigorous results have been revisited and developed for studies related to the quarkonium : scaling law , virial - like theorems , level order , value of wave - function at the origin for the successive radial excitations , etc . this is reviewed in @xcite . the 3-body problem one has to solve for baryons is often a psychological barrier that refrain to envisage a detailed and rigorous treatment beyond the harmonic oscillator , and there is sometimes a confusion between the `` constituent model of baryons '' and the harmonic oscillator model of baryons . for instance , the negative - parity excitation being half - way of the positive - parity excitation is a property of the latter , but not necessarily of the former . for baryons , there are just a few rigorous results , for instance dealing the level order of states when the degeneracy obtained in the harmonic oscillator or hyperscalar limit are lifted at first order @xcite . as for the numerical solution , various methods have been used , such as hyperspherical expansion , faddeev equations , or variational methods , with a comparison in @xcite . note that among the latter , the expansion on a harmonic - oscillator basis is less and less adopted , as it does not give good convergence for the short - range correlation parameters which enter some decays and some production mechanisms . for multiquark systems , the hyperspherical expansion works rather well @xcite , especially for deeply bound states , if any , for which the various r.m.s . radii are of the same order of magnitude . the tendency is towards the method of gaussian expansion , already used in quantum chemistry . if @xmath326 are jacobi variable describing the relative motion of the @xmath199-body system , then the wave - function is sought as @xmath327\,|a\rangle~,\ ] ] where @xmath328 denotes the basis of internal colour - spin - flavour states needed to construct the most general colour singlet of given overall spin and flavour , and @xmath329 is a @xmath330 definite positive symmetric matrix . for a given set of matrices @xmath329 , the weight factors @xmath331 are given by a generalised eigenvalue equation . then the range parameters entering the @xmath329 are minimised numerically . this latter task is not obvious , and sophisticated techniques have been developed , such as the stochastic search @xcite , and the method of hiyama , kino and kamimura @xcite , in which a specific choice of jacobi variables is chosen in each channel . the variational energies below the threshold are interpreted as bound states . the scaling properties of the states above the threshold are scrutinised to decide whether they are genuine resonances or artefacts of the finite variational expansion . this is somewhat similar to the analyses of states above the threshold in qcdsr or lqcd . [ [ diquarks ] ] diquarks + + + + + + + + hadron spectroscopy with diquarks has ups and downs , or , say , pros and cons . the art of physics is to identity effective degrees of freedom at a certain scale , and any simplification is welcome . the concept of diquark is very useful to describe many phenomenons such a multiple production @xcite , and might be legitimated by boson - fermion symmetry @xcite . in spectroscopy , the diquark model provides a simple physical picture that might be obscured in complicated three - body calculations , and it provides an efficient tool for investigating exotics @xcite . some reservations are however expressed about the abundant literature on diquarks , which is sometimes confusing , as some recent papers do refer to the old ones : * explicit quark model calculations find diquark correlations , but the effect depends on a somewhat arbitrary regularisation of the chromomagnetic interaction @xcite . in other studies , no diquark clustering is found for the ground state @xcite . this means that the diquark picture of low - lying baryons implies a change of dynamics . on the other hand , a dynamical diquark formation is obtained for highly excited baryons : if the total angular momentum @xmath332 increases , it is first shared equally among the 3 quarks , but at larger @xmath332 the third quark takes @xmath333 while the two first are mainly in a relative @xmath4-wave ( of course modulo permutations ) @xcite . * the diquark model becomes a good approximation for the ground state of double - charm baryons @xmath334 provided it is handled and interpreted properly , since a part of the @xmath241 interaction comes from the third quark . in the case of the harmonic oscillator , with the usual definition of the jacobi variables @xmath97 and @xmath335 , one notices that @xmath336 , so the direct @xmath241 interaction @xmath337 gets a 50% increase from the light quark . moreover , the first excitations of @xmath334 ( besides spin ) occur with @xmath338 , so a new diquark has to be estimated for each level . in fact a born - oppenheimer treatment la h@xmath200 is more appropriate . [ [ bornoppenheimer ] ] born oppenheimer + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + along this review , we stressed the importance of the born - oppenheimer point of view : the quarkonium potential is just an effective interaction integrating out the gluon and light - quark degrees of freedom surrounding a heavy quark and a heavy antiquark ; doubly - heavy baryons @xmath334 have typically two scales of energy for its spectrum , the excitation energy of the @xmath241 pair , and the excitation energy of the light quark , and this comes very naturally in the born - oppenheimer treatment , as it does in atomic physics for h@xmath200 . we also mentioned that hybrid mesons , schematically noted @xmath339 have been studied by estimating an `` excited quarkonium potential '' : for a given @xmath239 separation , the energy of the excited gluon field is computed either from a simple bag model , or from lqcd . a born - oppenheimer treatment of @xmath266 would also be feasible , to cross - check the 4-body calculations discussed in sec . [ sse : chromoelectric ] . recently , a very comprehensive and unifying born - oppenheimer treatment of the @xmath75 states was presented @xcite , with a series of effective @xmath239 potentials adapted to the quantum states of the light constituents ( gluon and light quarks ) . this work could of course be generalised as to include @xmath340 instead of @xmath341 in the light sector , and applied to the lhcb pentaquarks . there are interesting alternatives for the coupling of @xmath239 to light quarks and antiquarks . for instance , a relatively weak interaction between @xmath12 or @xmath342 with nuclei has been proposed , but , once more , this potential is probed by a particle which is heavy enough to get bound . in _ , the compact @xmath239 is trapped inside an extended light hadron . see @xcite . in the future , the field of exotic hadrons might be extended very far , if some new constituents are discovered , for instance at lhc . as stressed by many authors ( see , for instance , @xcite ) , some anomalies in the higgs branching ratios , and the other recent observations at cern might indicate the existence of heavy scalars . among the many possible scenarios , there is the possibility of scalar quarks with colour charge @xmath343 , having the same colour - mediated interaction as the ordinary quarks , except of course for spin and statistics . perhaps the lowest of theses scalars will live long enough to hadronise , and give rise to new hadrons . the lifetime of the hypothetical scalar quarks would of course be crucial . remember that for many years the potential model of charmonium and bottomonium was extrapolated towards topomonium . then it was realised that , when the mass of @xmath209 quark is too large , its weak decay becomes too fast for hadronisation to take place @xcite . if this is the case for any new super - heavy quark or squark , then the realm of exotic hadrons will remain the privilege of low - energy hadron physics . let us consider a scenario with heavy scalar quarks of colour @xmath343 , as predicted by supersymmetry or any other bsm ( beyond standard model ) theory . ( there are speculations about colour @xmath320 or other gauge groups . ) we note them `` squarks '' without necessarily endorsing supersymmetry . then , one gets squarkonia ( @xmath344 ) , and perhaps the scalar ground state could be responsible for the excess tentatively seen at 750gev . see , e.g. , @xcite . i apologise for the lack of space needed to cite the other @xmath345 relevant references , and the lack of expertise to separate the really innovative papers from the `` ambulance chasing '' opportunities @xcite . the lightest charged hadron is likely @xmath346 for @xmath347 with charge @xmath348 or @xmath349 of @xmath350 type , but spin 0 , if @xmath351 with charge @xmath352 . the baryon sector becomes entertaining if several squarks are put together . for instance @xmath353 has quantum numbers @xmath110 as the @xmath354 disquark contains one unit of orbital excitation , to fulfill the bose statistics . the triply - superexotic @xmath355 requires a fully antisymmetric wave function @xmath356 , as per eq . that was proposed 50 years ago for the last member of the @xmath357 multiplet for light baryons , the so - called @xmath358 $ ] multiplet in the notation of , e.g. , @xcite . fifty years after the first baryon conference , the physics has evolved , but one uses the same wave function ( besides some scaling ) . exotic hadrons are coming up and down , or back and forth if one prefers . for outsiders , there is somewhat a discredit on a field in which many states regularly show up rapidly and then disappear within a few years , with many papers hastily written to explain the new hadrons , and never any deep understanding on why the models fail . this is of course , a superficial view . the truth is that the experiments are very difficult , due to a low statistics for a signal above an intricate background . the situation is even worse for broad resonances . as often stressed @xcite , the location of the peak might depend on the production process and on the final state , so that there is often the question on whether two or more candidates correspond to the same `` state '' . so far , several mass ranges and flavour sectors have been investigated with already a few good candidates for exotics such as @xmath48 . the main lesson of the last decades is clearly the richness of the configurations mixing heavy and light constituents . the hidden - charm sector is already much explored , and even if the recent discoveries have to be checked , refined and completed , there is clearly an urgent need for investigating the double charm and other flavor exotic sectors . hopefully , there will be an emulation between electron - positron machines , proton colliders , heavy - ion collisions and intense hadron facilities to develop this program . on the theory side , the fundamental approaches such as lqcd or qcdsr involve lengthy calculations and usually come second , to clarify some predictions . first appear the speculations based on more empirical models , inspired by qcd . in phenomenological qcd , _ arx tarpeia capitoli proxima _ : physicists inventing molecules or quark clusters that account for the latest exotics are praised for their inspiration , invited to many workshops and conferences , hired in committees , etc . , but , when the states disappear , the same model - builders are pointed out as lacking rigour and corrupting the field . to be honest , it often happens that the pioneers have written their predictions rather carefully , with many warnings about the width of states in the continuum , but that the followers have developed the models beyond any reasonable control , with tables and tables of states which simply fall part . for one of the models of multiquarks , a warning was set @xcite that only a few states will show up as peaks , the others , being very broad , just paving the continuum , but the warning was often forgotten . pandora box syndrome _ affects practically all approaches . for instance , the molecular picture was first focused on one - pion exchange , with strict selection rules , that makes the interaction repulsive in any second channel . with the exchange of vector mesons , and the old - fashioned potentials replaced by effective theories , the molecular picture has gained some respectability , but has dramatically widened the spectrum of predictions . in the diquark model , frederikson and jandel @xcite discussed the existence of possible dibaryons , and the problem was rediscovered recently @xcite , that the picture of @xmath75 as diquark - antidiquark states probably implies higher configurations . this is why genuinely exotic states , lying below their dissociation threshold , will always play a privileged role , and the searches in the sector of double heavy flavour should be given the highest priority . in any case , the studies on the mechanisms of confinement and the resulting nuclear forces should be pursued . the strong - coupling limit of qcd and lattice simulations explain how a linear confinement is developed between a quark and an antiquark . it is already more delicate to understand its extension to baryons , with possible interplay between @xmath7-shape and @xmath315-shape configurations for the gluon density , and even more speculative to write down a confining hamiltonian for multiquarks . what remain to be further investigated , based on the already rich literature is how clustering sometimes occur in baryons and higher multiquarks , and how the linear confinement breaks to lead to the actual decay of resonances and the virtual hadron - hadron components , i.e. , to operate the matching of the quark dynamics and the long - range hadron - hadron interaction . this review benefited from stimulating discussions with my past and present collaborators and with many colleagues . it was completed during a visit at riken , in the framework of a jsps - cnrs agreement , and finalised during a visit at ect*. the hospitality provided by emiko hiyama , by jochen wambach , and by their colleagues is gratefully acknowledged . thanks are also due to m. asghar for very interesting comments on the manuscript . 300ifxundefined [ 1 ] ifx#1 ifnum [ 1 ] # 1firstoftwo secondoftwo ifx [ 1 ] # 1firstoftwo secondoftwo `` `` # 1''''@noop [ 0]secondoftwosanitize@url [ 0 ] + 12$12 & 12#1212_12%12@startlink[1]@endlink[0]@bib@innerbibempty http://cds.cern.ch/record/100978[__ ] ( , , ) http://cds.cern.ch/record/107749[__ ] ( , , ) http://cds.cern.ch/record/317696[__ ] ( , , ) link:\doibase 10.1103/revmodphys.34.766 [ * * , ( ) ] link:\doibase 10.1103/physrev.101.1570 [ * * , ( ) ] http://cds.cern.ch/record/107781[__ ] ( , , ) link:\doibase 10.1103/physrev.142.1000 [ * * , ( ) ] link:\doibase 10.1088/1674 - 1137/38/9/090001 [ * * , ( ) ] @noop * * , ( ) @noop * * , ( ) link:\doibase 10.1016/j.physrep.2007.07.006 [ * * , ( ) ] , in http://alice.cern.ch/format/showfull?sysnb=0105412[__ ] ( ) p. link:\doibase 10.1016/s0375 - 9474(97)00348 - 5 [ * * , ( ) ] link:\doibase 10.1016/s0375 - 9474(97)00694 - 5 [ * * , ( ) ] link:\doibase 10.1016/j.nuclphysbps.2013.10.040 [ * * , ( ) ] @noop * * , ( ) , link:\doibase 10.1016/j.physrep.2010.07.005 [ * * , ( ) ] , @noop * * , ( ) , link:\doibase 10.1016/j.physrep.2016.05.004 [ ( ) , 10.1016/j.physrep.2016.05.004 ] , https://books.google.fr/books?id=r_27t1yxxqac[__ ] , cambridge monographs on particle physics , nuclear physics and cosmology ( , ) , ed . , http://scitation.aip.org/content/aip/proceeding/aipcp/1735[__ ] , vol . ( ) , , , , and , eds . , http://www.actaphys.uj.edu.pl/findarticle?series=sup&vol=8&page=503[__ ] , vol . ( ) @noop link:\doibase 10.1016/j.physletb.2005.04.011 [ * * , ( ) ] , link:\doibase 10.1016/j.physletb.2003.05.003 [ * * , ( ) ] , link:\doibase 10.1016/j.physletb.2005.08.113 [ * * , ( ) ] , link:\doibase 10.1063/1.1482444 [ * * , ( ) ] , , link:\doibase 10.1103/physrevlett.79.1630 [ * * , ( ) ] , link:\doibase 10.1103/physrevlett.104.241803 [ * * , ( ) ] , in https://inspirehep.net/record/1409299/files/arxiv:1512.03699.pdf[__ ] ( ) link:\doibase 10.1016/j.ppnp.2015.03.001 [ * * , ( ) ] , @noop link:\doibase 10.1103/physrevlett.90.242001 [ * * , ( ) ] , link:\doibase 10.1103/physrevd.68.032002 , 10.1103/physrevd.75.119908 [ * * , ( ) ] , , link:\doibase 10.1103/physrevd.32.189 [ * * , ( ) ] link:\doibase 10.1016/0370 - 2693(79)90347 - 2 [ * * , ( ) ] link:\doibase 10.1016/0550 - 3213(82)90140 - 7 [ * * , ( ) ] @noop * * , ( ) , link:\doibase 10.1143/ptp.117.1077 [ * * , ( ) ] , link:\doibase 10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2007.03.173 [ * * , ( ) ] link:\doibase 10.1140/epja / i2006 - 10199 - 0 [ * * , ( ) ] link:\doibase 10.1103/physrevd.91.094020 [ * * , ( ) ] , link:\doibase 10.1103/physrevd.93.034035 [ * * , ( ) ] , link:\doibase 10.1103/physrevlett.39.1506 [ * * , ( ) ] link:\doibase 10.1103/physrevd.16.799 [ * * , ( ) ] @noop * * , ( ) link:\doibase 10.1103/physrevlett.106.212001 [ * * , ( ) ] , link:\doibase 10.1016/j.physletb.2011.09.096 [ * * , ( ) ] , @noop ( ) , link:\doibase 10.1103/physrevd.88.054029 [ * * , ( ) ] , link:\doibase 10.1103/physrevd.70.071102 [ * * , ( ) ] , @noop * * , ( ) link:\doibase 10.1142/s0217751x09046576 [ * * , ( ) ] link:\doibase 10.1016/0370 - 2693(86)91013 - 0 [ * * , ( ) ] link:\doibase 10.1103/physrevlett.69.2337 [ * * , ( ) ] link:\doibase 10.1103/physrevd.72.092004 [ * * , ( ) ] , link:\doibase 10.1103/physrevlett.89.102001 [ * * , ( ) ] , , @noop * * , ( ) , ( ) , @noop * * , ( ) , link:\doibase 10.1103/physrevlett.100.142001 [ * * , ( ) ] , link:\doibase 10.1103/physrevlett.98.082001 [ * * , ( ) ] , link:\doibase 10.1103/physrevlett.100.202001 [ * * , ( ) ] , link:\doibase 10.1103/physrevlett.96.082003 [ * * , ( ) ] , link:\doibase 10.1103/physrevlett.104.092001 [ * * , ( ) ] , link:\doibase 10.1103/physrevlett.104.112004 [ * * , ( ) ] , link:\doibase 10.1103/physrevlett.101.172001 [ * * , ( ) ] , @noop ( ) , link:\doibase 10.1103/physrevd.82.094008 [ * * , ( ) ] , link:\doibase 10.1103/physrevd.71.031501 [ * * , ( ) ] , @noop * * , ( ) , link:\doibase 10.1103/physrevlett.110.252002 [ * * , ( ) ] , link:\doibase 10.1016/j.physletb.2013.10.041 [ * * , ( ) ] , in http://inspirehep.net/record/1415952/files/arxiv:1601.05025.pdf[__ ] ( ) @noop ( ) , link:\doibase 10.1088/0954 - 3899/37/7/075017 [ * * , ( ) ] , @noop * * , ( ) , link:\doibase 10.1088/0034 - 4885/76/7/076301 [ * * , ( ) ] , link:\doibase 10.1142/s0218301392000242 [ * * , ( ) ] link:\doibase 10.1016/0003 - 4916(60)90001 - 4 [ * * , ( ) ] @noop link:\doibase 10.1103/physrevd.18.4187 [ * * , ( ) ] link:\doibase 10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2016.04.013 [ * * , ( ) ] , link:\doibase 10.1142/s0217751x02012715 [ * * , ( ) ] , , link:\doibase 10.1103/physrevlett.18.801 [ * * , ( ) ] link:\doibase 10.1103/physrev.165.1770 [ * * , ( ) ] link:\doibase 10.1016/0550 - 3213(72)90491 - 9 [ * * , ( ) ] link:\doibase 10.1016/0550 - 3213(71)90291 - 4 [ * * , ( ) ] link:\doibase 10.1016/0550 - 3213(75)90104 - 2 [ * * , ( ) ] link:\doibase 10.1103/revmodphys.52.s1 [ * * , ( ) ] link:\doibase 10.1103/physrevlett.91.012002 [ * * , ( ) ] , link:\doibase 10.1007/s002180050406 [ * * , ( ) ] , @noop ( ) link:\doibase 10.1140/epjh / e2012 - 20032 - 0 [ * * , ( ) ] @noop * * , ( ) , link:\doibase 10.1140/epjc / s2004 - 01815 - 4 [ * * , ( ) ] , link:\doibase 10.1103/physrevd.75.114018 [ * * , ( ) ] , link:\doibase 10.1103/physrevlett.101.232002 [ * * , ( ) ] , link:\doibase 10.1103/physrevd.80.072003 [ * * , ( ) ] , link:\doibase 10.1103/physrevlett.110.182001 [ * * , ( ) ] , link:\doibase 10.1016/j.physletb.2008.07.018 [ * * , ( ) ] link:\doibase 10.1103/physrevd.83.094005 [ * * , ( ) ] , link:\doibase 10.1103/physrevlett.114.062004 [ * * , ( ) ] , @noop ( ) , link:\doibase 10.1103/physrevd.66.014008 [ * * , ( ) ] , @noop * * , ( ) @noop * * , ( ) , @noop * * , ( ) , link:\doibase 10.1016/s0920 - 5632(02)01948 - 5 [ * * , ( ) ] , link:\doibase 10.1103/physrevd.74.011103 [ * * , ( ) ] , link:\doibase 10.1103/physrevd.89.052003 [ * * , ( ) ] , link:\doibase 10.1007/jhep12(2013)090 [ * * , ( ) ] , link:\doibase 10.1146/annurev - nucl-102711 - 094949 [ * * , ( ) ] , , link:\doibase 10.1103/physrevd.90.094007 [ * * , ( ) ] , link:\doibase 10.1016/s0370 - 2693(02)03069 - 1 [ * * , ( ) ] , link:\doibase 10.1103/physrevd.74.094003 [ * * , ( ) ] , link:\doibase 10.1016/0370 - 2693(87)91244 - 5 [ * * , ( ) ] link:\doibase 10.1016/0370 - 2693(87)90055 - 4 [ * * , ( ) ] link:\doibase 10.1103/physrevlett.81.44 [ * * , ( ) ] , link:\doibase 10.1016/s0370 - 2693(99)00058 - 1 [ * * , ( ) ] link:\doibase 10.1016/j.physletb.2004.03.012 [ * * , ( ) ] , link:\doibase 10.1140/epjc / s2004 - 02042 - 9 [ * * , ( ) ] , link:\doibase 10.1103/physrevd.73.091101 [ * * , ( ) ] , https://cds.cern.ch/record/298433[__ ] , ( , , ) link:\doibase 10.1103/physrevlett.115.072001 [ * * , ( ) ] , @noop ( ) , link:\doibase 10.1007/jhep07(2014)103 [ * * , ( ) ] , link:\doibase 10.1140/epja / i2015 - 15152 - 6 [ * * , ( ) ] , link:\doibase 10.1103/physrevd.93.094001 [ * * , ( ) ] , link:\doibase 10.1103/physrevlett.117.082003 , 10.1103/physrevlett.117.109902 [ * * , ( ) ] , , link:\doibase 10.1103/physrevd.92.031502 [ * * , ( ) ] , @noop ( ) , link:\doibase 10.1103/physrevd.94.034002 [ * * , ( ) ] , link:\doibase 10.1016/j.physletb.2015.11.068 [ * * , ( ) ] , @noop ( ) , @noop link:\doibase 10.1103/physrevd.35.128 [ * * , ( ) ] link:\doibase 10.1103/physrevc.48.1926 [ * * , ( ) ] link:\doibase 10.1103/physrevc.50.1796 [ * * , ( ) ] , link:\doibase 10.1103/physrevc.59.1878 [ * * , ( ) ] link:\doibase 10.1103/physrevlett.63.1570 [ * * , ( ) ] link:\doibase 10.1103/physrevlett.53.423 [ * * , ( ) ] link:\doibase 10.1103/physrevlett.112.202301 [ * * , ( ) ] , link:\doibase 10.1103/physrevc.90.035204 [ * * , ( ) ] , link:\doibase 10.1103/physrevc.39.1889 [ * * , ( ) ] link:\doibase 10.1007/s00601 - 012 - 0390 - 6 [ * * , ( ) ] , link:\doibase 10.1093/ptep / ptv076 [ * * , ( ) ] , @noop * * , ( ) link:\doibase 10.1016/0375 - 9474(96)00211 - 4 [ * * , ( ) ] link:\doibase 10.1142/s0217979207037855 [ * * , ( ) ] , link:\doibase 10.1103/physrevlett.38.195 [ * * , ( ) ] , link:\doibase 10.1098/rspa.1989.0115 [ * * , ( ) ] link:\doibase 10.1088/0954 - 3899/28/7/323 [ * * , ( ) ] link:\doibase 10.1103/physrevlett.59.627 [ * * , ( ) ] link:\doibase 10.1103/physrevc.92.065202 [ * * , ( ) ] , link:\doibase 10.1103/physrev.47.903 [ * * , ( ) ] link:\doibase 10.1016/0370 - 1573(93)90141-y [ * * , ( ) ] @noop ( ) , , link:\doibase 10.1007/s00601 - 011 - 0296 - 8 [ * * , ( ) ] link:\doibase 10.1103/physrevc.65.041001 [ * * , ( ) ] , link:\doibase 10.1088/0954 - 3899/42/2/025103 [ * * , ( ) ] link:\doibase 10.1103/physrevc.91.014003 [ * * , ( ) ] , link:\doibase 10.1103/physrevc.94.024002 [ * * , ( ) ] , link:\doibase 10.1209/epl / i2003 - 00176 - 1 [ * * , ( ) ] , link:\doibase 10.1103/physrevlett.80.1876 [ * * , ( ) ] , link:\doibase 10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2009.05.118 [ * * , ( ) ] link:\doibase 10.1103/physreva.67.034702 [ * * , ( ) ] , @noop * * , ( ) , link:\doibase 10.1103/physrevlett.21.950 [ * * , ( ) ] link:\doibase 10.1007/jhep06(2016)041 [ * * , ( ) ] , @noop * * , ( ) @noop * * , ( ) link:\doibase 10.1016/0370 - 2693(80)90906 - 5 [ * * , ( ) ] @noop * * , ( ) @noop * * , ( ) @noop * * , ( ) link:\doibase 10.1016/0370 - 2693(77)90081 - 8 [ * * , ( ) ] link:\doibase 10.1103/physrevd.17.1444 [ * * , ( ) ] link:\doibase 10.1016/0370 - 2693(78)90872 - 9 [ * * , ( ) ] link:\doibase 10.1103/physrev.76.1739 [ * * , ( ) ] link:\doibase 10.1016/0370 - 1573(78)90190 - 4 [ * * , ( ) ] link:\doibase 10.1016/0003 - 4916(79)90091 - 5 [ * * , ( ) ] @noop * * , ( ) @noop * * , ( ) @noop * * , ( ) @noop * * , ( ) link:\doibase 10.1103/physrevd.21.203 [ * * , ( ) ] @noop * * , ( ) @noop * * , ( ) , @noop * * , ( ) link:\doibase 10.1007/bf01413192 [ * * , ( ) ] , link:\doibase 10.1103/physrevc.88.015207 [ * * , ( ) ] , link:\doibase 10.1103/physrevd.78.034007 [ * * , ( ) ] , link:\doibase 10.1103/physrevd.86.014004 [ * * , ( ) ] , link:\doibase 10.1103/physrevd.92.014005 [ * * , ( ) ] , in @noop _ _ ( ) link:\doibase 10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2005.08.022 [ * * , ( ) ] , link:\doibase 10.1103/physrevd.88.056012 [ * * , ( ) ] , link:\doibase 10.1088/1674 - 1137/36/1/002 , 10.1088/1674 - 1137/36/3/006 [ * * , ( ) ] , @noop * * , ( ) , link:\doibase 10.1103/physrevc.69.055202 [ * * , ( ) ] , link:\doibase 10.1103/physrevd.86.034019 [ * * , ( ) ] , link:\doibase 10.1103/physrevlett.115.122001 [ * * , ( ) ] , link:\doibase 10.1103/physrevd.80.034008 [ * * , ( ) ] , link:\doibase 10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2005.01.022 [ * * , ( ) ] , link:\doibase 10.1103/physrevd.85.014015 [ * * , ( ) ] , link:\doibase 10.1016/j.physletb.2011.09.088 [ * * , ( ) ] , link:\doibase 10.1103/physrevc.89.035201 [ * * , ( ) ] , link:\doibase 10.1103/physrevd.84.014031 [ * * , ( ) ] , link:\doibase 10.1103/physrevd.86.014020 [ * * , ( ) ] , link:\doibase 10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2005.03.050 [ * * , ( ) ] , in http://alice.cern.ch/format/showfull?sysnb=0082623[__ ] ( ) link:\doibase 10.1088/0954 - 3899/40/4/043001 [ * * , ( ) ] , link:\doibase 10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2016.01.017 [ * * , ( ) ] , link:\doibase 10.1007/s00601 - 008 - 0263 - 1 [ * * , ( ) ] @noop * * , ( ) @noop * * , ( ) link:\doibase 10.1016/0370 - 2693(80)90491 - 8 [ * * , ( ) ] link:\doibase 10.1016/0370 - 2693(84)90473 - 8 [ * * , ( ) ] @noop * * , ( ) , link:\doibase 10.1103/physrevd.92.114019 [ * * , ( ) ] , link:\doibase 10.1016/0550 - 3213(79)90022 - 1 [ * * , ( ) ] link:\doibase 10.1016/0550 - 3213(79)90023 - 3 [ * * , ( ) ] link:\doibase 10.1016/0550 - 3213(79)90024 - 5 [ * * , ( ) ] link:\doibase 10.1103/physrevd.75.014005 [ * * , ( ) ] , link:\doibase 10.1103/physrevd.78.034012 [ * * , ( ) ] , link:\doibase 10.1016/j.nuclphysbps.2010.10.064 [ * * , ( ) ] , @noop ( ) , , @noop * * , ( ) , link:\doibase 10.1103/physrevlett.106.162002 [ * * , ( ) ] , link:\doibase 10.1103/physrevlett.106.162001 [ * * , ( ) ] , link:\doibase 10.1063/1.3647373 [ * * , ( ) ] , link:\doibase 10.1093/ptep / pts010 [ * * , ( ) ] , link:\doibase 10.1103/physrevc.92.054002 [ * * , ( ) ] , link:\doibase 10.1063/1.4949382 [ * * , ( ) ] @noop ( ) , link:\doibase 10.1103/physrevc.57.3384 [ * * , ( ) ] , link:\doibase 10.1103/physrevd.60.054012 [ * * , ( ) ] , @noop * * , ( ) , link:\doibase 10.1103/physrevd.93.034501 [ * * , ( ) ] , @noop * * , ( ) link:\doibase 10.1103/physrevlett.87.212502 [ * * , ( ) ] link:\doibase 10.1016/0370 - 2693(83)91523-x [ * * , ( ) ] link:\doibase 10.1103/physrevd.33.2043 [ * * , ( ) ] link:\doibase 10.1103/physrevd.36.2079 [ * * , ( ) ] link:\doibase 10.1016/0146 - 6410(90)90023-w [ * * , ( ) ] link:\doibase 10.1103/physrevd.40.2340 [ * * , ( ) ] link:\doibase 10.1103/physrevd.45.4221 [ * * , ( ) ] link:\doibase 10.1103/physrevd.51.3628 [ * * , ( ) ] in http://alice.cern.ch/format/showfull?sysnb=0160281[__ ] ( ) link:\doibase 10.1140/epjc / s10052 - 006 - 0142 - 1 [ * * , ( ) ] , @noop * * , ( ) @noop * * , ( ) @noop * * , ( ) @noop * * , ( ) link:\doibase 10.1103/physreva.57.4956 [ * * , ( ) ] in @noop _ _ , ( ) p. link:\doibase 10.1103/physrevd.70.014009 [ * * , ( ) ] , link:\doibase 10.1016/j.physletb.2009.03.018 [ * * , ( ) ] , link:\doibase 10.1016/0003 - 4916(86)90088 - 6 [ * * , ( ) ] link:\doibase 10.1103/physrevd.76.114013 [ * * , ( ) ] , link:\doibase 10.1103/physrevc.81.015205 [ * * , ( ) ] , link:\doibase 10.1103/physrevd.85.014019 [ * * , ( ) ] , link:\doibase 10.1103/physrevd.87.034040 [ * * , ( ) ] , link:\doibase 10.1140/epjc / s2003 - 01416 - 9 [ * * , ( ) ] , link:\doibase 10.1016/j.physletb.2009.03.008 [ * * , ( ) ] , link:\doibase 10.1140/epjc / s10052 - 009 - 1050-y [ * * , ( ) ] , link:\doibase 10.1007/bf01413104 [ * * , ( ) ] @noop * * , ( ) , link:\doibase 10.1103/physrevd.76.094027 [ * * , ( ) ] , link:\doibase 10.1103/physrevd.94.034038 [ * * , ( ) ] , http://cds.cern.ch/record/112712[__ ] ( , , ) link:\doibase 10.1016/0370 - 1573(79)90095 - 4 [ * * , ( ) ] link:\doibase 10.1016/0370 - 1573(80)90031 - 9 [ * * , ( ) ] http://cds.cern.ch/record/847188[__ ] , cambridge monographs on particle physics , nuclear physics , and cosmology ( , , ) link:\doibase 10.1016/0550 - 3213(90)90144 - 3 [ * * , ( ) ] link:\doibase 10.1016/0370 - 2693(91)90163-k [ * * , ( ) ] link:\doibase 10.1016/0370 - 1573(92)90078-e [ * * , ( ) ] link:\doibase 10.1103/revmodphys.85.693 [ * * , ( ) ] link:\doibase 10.1016/s0146 - 6410(03)90015 - 9 [ * * , ( ) ] link:\doibase 10.1103/revmodphys.65.1199 [ * * , ( ) ] link:\doibase 10.1142/s0217751x16300295 [ * * , ( ) ] , link:\doibase 10.1088/0954 - 3899/23/8/001 [ * * , ( ) ] link:\doibase 10.1007/bf01344395 [ * * , ( ) ] link:\doibase 10.1103/physrevd.38.1519 [ * * , ( ) ] @noop * * , ( ) link:\doibase 10.1103/physrevd.90.014044 [ * * , ( ) ] , link:\doibase 10.1016/j.physletb.2008.07.086 [ * * , ( ) ] , link:\doibase 10.1103/physrevd.87.091501 [ * * , ( ) ] , link:\doibase 10.1142/s0217751x15502012 [ * * , ( ) ] link:\doibase 10.1016/0370 - 2693(86)91275-x [ * * , ( ) ] link:\doibase 10.1103/physrevd.93.055042 [ * * , ( ) ] , @noop ( ) , link:\doibase 10.1016/0370 - 1573(83)90114-x [ * * , ( ) ] link:\doibase 10.1140/epjad / s2004 - 03 - 010 - 4 [ * * , ( ) ] , link:\doibase 10.1088/1674 - 1137/40/4/042001 [ * * , ( ) ] , link:\doibase 10.1103/physrevd.19.2105 [ * * , ( ) ] link:\doibase 10.1103/physrevlett.48.14 [ * * , ( ) ] link:\doibase 10.1016/j.physletb.2015.08.049 [ * * , ( ) ] , link:\doibase 10.1016/j.physletb.2008.07.018 [ * * , ( ) ] Abstract:

Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.

Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered . Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video . Paper: sn 1995n in mcg02 - 38 - 017 ( also known as arp 261 ) was discovered by pollas ( 1995 ) on 5 may 1995 ( ut dates are used throughout this paper ) . its approximate distance is 24 mpc , based on @xmath4 mpc@xmath5 and the measured recession velocity of the host galaxy ( 1834 @xmath0 ; theureau et al . optical spectra of the object obtained by benetti , bouchet , & schwarz ( 1995 ) and by garnavich & challis ( 1995 ) showed it to be a peculiar type ii supernova , with h@xmath2 emission ( full - width at half - maximum intensity [ fwhm ] @xmath6 ) and narrow lines of he i , he ii , [ n ii ] , [ o i ] , [ o iii ] , [ ne iii ] , [ ca v ] , fe ii , [ fe ii ] , [ fe iii ] , [ fe vii ] , and [ fe x ] . the intensity ratios of the narrow oxygen lines suggest a high electron density , @xmath7 @xmath8 ( garnavich & challis 1995 ) . benetti et al . ( 1995 ) estimated it to be at least 10 months old , so we will assume an explosion date of 4 july 1994 , befitting for a supernova ( in the opinion of the u.s . coauthors of this paper ) . radio emission from the supernova was discovered at 3.6 cm on 16 june 1995 ( van dyk et al . 1996 ) . x - ray emission was discovered with _ rosat _ on 23 july 1996 , and the source was subsequently observed with _ asca _ on 20 january 1998 ( fox et al . the unabsorbed x - ray luminosity was @xmath9 in the 0.110 kev band . the narrow emission lines observed from sn 1995n place it in the type iin category ( schlegel 1990 ; filippenko 1991a , b , 1997 ) , which often show a slow optical decline compared to other type ii supernovae ( sne ii ) . baird et al . ( 1998 ) have noted the slow evolution of sn 1995n . the high x - ray and radio luminosities of sn 1995n place it in a subset of sne iin whose other well - studied members are sn 1986j ( rupen et al . 1987 ; weiler , panagia , & sramek 1990 ; leibundgut et al . 1991 ; houck et al . 1998 ) , sn 1988z ( stathakis & sadler 1991 ; filippenko 1991a , b ; turatto et al . 1993 ; van dyk et al . 1993 ; fabian & terlevich 1996 ; aretxaga et al . 1999 ) , sn 1978k ( ryder et al . 1993 ; chugai , danziger , & della valle 1995 ; schlegel , petre , & colbert 1996 ) , and sn 1998s ( leonard et al . 2000 , gerardy et al . 2000 ; fassia et al . all of them have x - ray luminosities @xmath10 , which are at least an order of magnitude higher than the x - ray luminosities of other sne ii . these are also among the most luminous radio sne , although sn 1979c does rival them in luminosity , as does sn 1998bw , a very different kind of object and at a much earlier epoch ( e.g. , galama et al . 1998 ; kulkarni et al . 1998 ) . the early optical observations of sn 1988z ( stathakis & sadler 1991 ) showed velocities up to @xmath11 , and very long baseline interferometry ( vlbi ) radio observations of sn 1986j ( bartel , shapiro , & rupen 1989 ; bartel et al . 1991 ) implied expansion velocities of @xmath12 . at the same time , these sne showed h@xmath2 emission lines with fwhm @xmath13 , and at least sn 1988z exhibited very narrow emission lines whose intensity ratios indicate high gas densities . this combination suggests that the rapidly moving supernova material is running into dense circumstellar clumps and is driving slower shock fronts into them ( chugai 1993 ; chugai & danziger 1994 ; chugai et al . in addition , the combination of high velocities with strong circumstellar interaction requires that the supernova have considerable high - velocity gas in order not to be rapidly decelerated . for sn 1988z , chugai & danziger ( 1994 ) estimate that the total mass in supernova ejecta is only @xmath14 if the explosion energy is the standard @xmath15 ergs . in order to more fully understand the nature of this peculiar subset of sne iin , we have undertaken a detailed spectroscopic study of sn 1995n , one of the most important and thoroughly studied examples . we present the ground - based and _ hubble space telescope ( hst ) _ observations in 2 . in 3 , we discuss the three main kinematic components visible in the emission - line profiles . synthetic spectra are presented in 4 , and the temporal evolution of features is examined in 5 . we discuss the results and their implications in 6 , and we summarize our conclusions in 7 . figure [ fig1a ] shows a 3-minute @xmath16-band image of mcg02 - 38 - 107 and sn 1995n taken with the fors1 instrument on the eso very large telescope ( vlt ) on 11 may 1999 ( ut dates are used throughout this paper ) . figure [ fig1b ] is an _ hst _ wfpc2 @xmath17-band ( f814w ) image of sn 1995n obtained on 22 july 2000 ; the supernova is easily visible at @xmath18 mag . these two images demonstrate that the supernova occurred in a region relatively free of background emission and dust . the main observations of sn 1995n presented in this paper consist of ground - based optical spectra obtained on nine epochs and ultraviolet ( uv ) _ hst _ spectra on one epoch . the log of the observations is given in table [ tab1 ] , where the wavelength ranges , ut dates , and approximate epoch since explosion are summarized . the assumed explosion date of 4 july 1994 is uncertain , but this does not appreciably affect our results because our data were taken long after the explosion ; the spectra cover epochs of 3211799 days . standard procedures were followed for the spectral extractions and reductions , which included sky subtraction , wavelength and flux calibration , and removal of telluric absorption ( e.g. , matheson et al . 2000 ) . the ground - based observations fall in two main groups : within @xmath19 years after discovery , and @xmath20 years after discovery . the former were obtained primarily with the kast spectrograph ( miller & stone 1993 ; @xmath21 slit ) on the 3-m shane reflector at lick observatory , but the low resolution imaging spectrometer ( lris ; oke et al . 1995 ; @xmath22 slit ) on the keck - i telescope was used to acquire an excellent spectrum ( day 1007 ) nearly contemporaneously with one of the lick spectra ( day 1012 ) . all of the lick and keck spectra ( except day 1012 ) are shown in figure [ fig2 ] . one can see that the spectrum evolved slowly during the time interval shown . in this paper , we present a detailed analysis of only two of these spectra ( days 716 and 1007 , which are among the two best ones ) . the very late - time ( @xmath20 years ) ground - based spectra were taken through a @xmath23 slit with fors1 on the vlt at eso . the day 1769 spectrum was obtained with gratings 300v and 300i , giving a resolution of @xmath24 . for the day 1799 spectrum the 600b , 600r , and 600i grisms were used , giving a higher resolution of @xmath25 . the day 1769 observing was done in good conditions , while the data from day 1799 were taken through clouds . the latter spectrum has higher signal - to - noise ratio ( @xmath26 ) than the former , however , so emission - line measurements are reported for it ( scaled to the flux level of the day 1769 spectrum ) . the _ hst _ spectra on day 943 were obtained with the faint object spectrograph ( fos ) with the g400h , g270h , and g160l gratings . total exposures times were 2860 , 4770 , and 2110 s , and the resolution was 3.0 , 2.1 , and 6.9 per diode , respectively . the spectra were calibrated by the fos pipeline at the space telescope science institute . all spectra , except the vlt and _ hst _ spectra , were calibrated to the @xmath27-band and @xmath16-band photometry of baird et al . the keck spectrum ( day 1007 ) has the highest @xmath26 , and in figure [ fig3 ] we show it together with the _ hst _ spectra ( day 943 ) . the keck and _ hst _ spectra were taken at different epochs , but from the day 1037 lick spectrum we find a smooth evolution , and we normalize the flux level of the overlapping region between the _ hst _ g400h spectrum and the keck spectrum to that of the keck epoch . the dirbe / iras maps ( schlegel , finkbeiner , & davis 1998 ) give @xmath28 mag for the galactic reddening of sn 1995n . in addition , there could be internal reddening from both the host galaxy and the circumstellar environment . the host galaxy is a blue compact galaxy , a class which is generally dust - poor , although h ii regions can show substantial reddening ( kong & cheng 1999 ) . the fact that the supernova is located in the outskirts of the galaxy ( figures [ fig1a ] , [ fig1b ] ) also makes it natural to expect a relatively low extinction . from the relative strengths of the higher members of the h i and he i recombination series , there is no indication of strong reddening ( [ sec_result ] ) . the normal intensity ratio of uv o iii ] lines relative to the optical also indicates this . in the following , we use @xmath29 mag for the total reddening . figure [ fig3 ] shows that there are lines spanning a large range of velocities , and we can distinguish at least three kinematic components in the supernova . the narrow , unresolved lines are clearly distinct , while the other two components are less obvious and are shown in the mg ii @xmath30 , [ o iii ] @xmath31 , and h@xmath2 lines at 9431007 days on the same velocity scale in figure [ fig4 ] . the h@xmath2 and [ o iii ] profiles are from the keck day 1007 spectrum and the mg ii profile from the _ hst _ spectrum . the h@xmath2 and [ o iii ] lines have quite different profiles , with the former having a fairly peaked profile , but with weak wings reaching very high velocity , @xmath32 , while the latter has a more boxy profile reaching a velocity of @xmath33 . another strong indication of two separate high - velocity components is the different temporal evolution of the [ o i ] , [ o ii ] , and [ o iii ] lines compared to the others ( [ sec_time ] ) . here we discuss these three components individually . the narrowest lines in the spectra are unresolved , implying fwhm @xmath34 . they are listed in table [ tab2 ] , where it can be seen that the emission is dominated by ions with moderately high ionization . some of the lines provide useful diagnostics for the emitting region , and we begin by considering them . * [ o iii]*. the [ o iii ] @xmath354959 , 5007 lines are by far the strongest narrow lines and , together with [ o iii ] @xmath364363 , provide a useful constraint on the electron temperature @xmath37 and the electron density @xmath38 . the relatively low ratio of @xmath39 implies that collisional deexcitation of the @xmath40 level is important , so that the ratio depends on density as well as temperature ( e.g. , filippenko & halpern 1984 ; osterbrock 1989 ) . the densities corresponding to various assumed temperatures are in the range @xmath41 for @xmath42 ( or @xmath43 for @xmath44 ) , where @xmath45 . on day 1799 the vlt spectrum shows a similar value , @xmath46 , which gives @xmath47 for @xmath48 . * o iii bowen lines*. in the near - uv spectral region , several bowen fluorescence lines are seen , most notably o iii @xmath49 . we measure @xmath50 and @xmath51 . based on the bowen process , kallman & mccray ( 1980 ) give ratios of 0.18 and 0.28 for these lines , respectively . considering that the uncertainties in the fluxes of both lines are at least a factor of two , the agreement is satisfying . the @xmath52 line is severely blended with [ ne iii ] @xmath53 and [ ne v ] @xmath54 , and no reliable flux estimate can be obtained . the ratio @xmath55 can be used to estimate the bowen yield for he ii @xmath56 . equation ( 25 ) in kallman & mccray ( 1980 ) , together with @xmath57 , gives a bowen yield of @xmath58 . correcting for reddening , we find @xmath59 , and therefore @xmath60 for sn 1995n at day 1007 . as a comparison , schachter , filippenko , & kahn ( 1990 ) find a mean @xmath61 for a sample of seyfert nuclei , while kallmann & mccray find that planetary nebulae have @xmath62 . the dispersion in both values is considerable . * [ o ii]*. the spectra show that [ o ii ] @xmath633726 , 3729 are not detected , but that [ o ii ] @xmath637320 , 7330 are weakly present with narrow components . the fact that @xmath64 implies that @xmath65 , provided that @xmath66 k. * [ n ii]*. the auroral [ n ii ] @xmath365755 line is present , but the nebular lines are superposed on the very strong h@xmath2 emission and it is not possible to obtain strong limits on them . we estimate @xmath67 , which implies that @xmath68 for @xmath69 k ( osterbrock 1989 ) . * [ fe vii]*. the observed lines of [ fe vii ] are @xmath633586 , 3759 , 5159 , 5276 , 5721 , 6087 . as discussed by nussbaumer & storey ( 1982 ) and keenan & norrington ( 1987 , 1991 ) , several of the [ fe vii ] lines provide diagnostic information on the emitting region . there is temperature sensitivity of the lines , and collisional deexcitation causes transitions from the low - density limits to the high - density limits in the range @xmath70 . the observed , reddening - corrected ratio @xmath71 in the keck spectrum ( day 1007 ) , and @xmath72 in the 12 june 1999 vlt spectrum ( day 1799 ) . from figure 2 of keenan & norrington ( 1987 ) , this sets a limit @xmath73 k for any density on day 1007 , and @xmath74 k for day 1799 . in the day 1799 spectrum , with the highest resolution , there are three distinct peaks at the positions of [ fe vi ] @xmath75 , [ fe vii ] @xmath76 , and [ fe vi ] @xmath77 . because of blending of these lines , it is difficult to obtain accurate fluxes , and depending on where we estimate the base of the line we get a ratio in the range @xmath78 and @xmath79 on days 1007 and 1799 , respectively . from figure 1 of keenan & norrington ( 1987 ) , the lower limits imply that @xmath80 if @xmath81 k. the lines at @xmath364942 and @xmath364989 are contaminated by the strong complex of [ o iii ] @xmath634959 , 5007 , with the result that interesting constraints on @xmath37 and @xmath38 can not be obtained from these lines ( keenan & norrington 1991 ) . overall , the above results point to a relatively high density for the narrow - line gas , which suggests a circumstellar rather than interstellar origin . if the [ o iii ] and [ fe vii ] lines are assumed to come from gas with similar physical properties , the implied characteristics are @xmath82 and @xmath69 k , although there is some evidence that the [ fe vii ] emission comes from a somewhat hotter region . it is likely , because of the low velocity and the relatively low pressure , that this gas is the unshocked circumstellar wind . presumably it was photoionized by the uv and x - ray radiation emitted by the supernova right after shock breakout . one can derive a lower limit to the radial distance of this gas by taking the product of the highest observed supernova ejecta velocity and the estimated age . as discussed below , the highest velocity is @xmath83 . the wind electron density in front of the shock then becomes @xmath84 where @xmath85 is the mass - loss rate from the progenitor star , @xmath86 is the wind velocity , and it has been assumed that h and he are fully ionized . the reference value of @xmath85 chosen here is close to the highest values that have been observed for galactic stars and to the strong radio emitter sn 1979c ( e.g. , lundqvist & fransson 1988 ) . either the progenitor star of sn 1995n was losing mass at an extraordinary rate , or the density of the observed gas is higher than the average density in the circumstellar wind . the gas density is sufficiently high that the recombination and excitation time scales are less than the supernova age , and approximate equilibrium is expected . the ionizing source is the x - ray emission , which had an unabsorbed x - ray luminosity of @xmath87 in the 0.110 kev band during july 1996 january 1998 ( fox et al . observations give a temperature estimate of 9 kev if the emission is thermal ( fox et al . models of x - ray nebulae have been presented by tarter , tucker , & salpeter ( 1969 ) and kallman & mccray ( 1982 ) . the latter models assume a constant density surrounding a central source and generally take @xmath88 kev for the photoionizing source , but the calculations can be used to approximate the current situation , especially because the [ fe vii ] lines are likely to be formed in a region optically thin to the ionizing continuum . the ionization properties depend on the ionization parameter , which can be defined as @xmath89 , where @xmath90 is the luminosity of the ionizing source . taking @xmath91 , @xmath92 , and @xmath93 cm , we find @xmath94 , which is very close to the ionization parameter where fe vii is expected , for a @xmath88 kev source ( kallman & mccray 1982 ) . a lower temperature for the continuum source would increase the estimated @xmath95 for a fixed @xmath90 . the gas temperature of this region in the photoionization models is @xmath96 k , consistent with the observations . this comparison provides support for the overall model and , in particular , for the estimated radial distance of the emitting region . the intensity of the narrow lines gives another constraint on the physical conditions . the hydrogen lines are the best to use because there are no abundance uncertainties . while no narrow h i lines can be seen in the day 1007 keck spectrum because of the strong broad component , the higher resolution day 1799 vlt spectrum clearly shows h@xmath2 , h@xmath97 , and h@xmath98 . for h@xmath97 , we find a luminosity of @xmath99 at 1799 days . if the emitting region is assumed to be at radius @xmath100 with a thickness @xmath101 and a covering factor @xmath102 , we have @xmath103 where the emissivity of h@xmath97 has been taken for @xmath104 k ( osterbrock 1989 ) . although the density is uncertain , it is clear that the observations imply a small filling factor . another indication of the small filling factor of the @xmath105 gas is the detection of a substantial x - ray flux by _ rosat_. if the gas were pervasive at @xmath106 cm , the resulting hydrogen column density , @xmath107 , would give rise to the complete absorption of the soft x - ray flux . the gas is not fully ionized and thus can effectively absorb the x - ray emission . in their estimate of the x - ray luminosity , fox et al . ( 2000 ) take @xmath108 based on the expected galactic absorption . most of the other ions that are observed in sn 1995n require an ionization parameter that is similar to that of fe vii . the ions fe vi through fe xi , which are observed , occur over a relatively small range of ionization parameter ( e.g. , kallman & mccray 1982 ) . however , the presence of narrow [ o i ] emission implies the existence of a separate , lower - ionization component . the region could be of low ionization because of an especially high density , but it is more likely that the region is neutral because the ionizing photons have been used up in the h ii region . the intermediate - width component is best exemplified by the [ o iii ] @xmath634959 , 5007 ( figure [ fig4 ] ) , [ o ii ] @xmath637320 , 7330 , and [ o i ] @xmath109 , 6363 emission lines , which all show box - shaped profiles extending to @xmath110 . the strongest feature in this component at all epochs is the [ o iii ] @xmath634959 , 5007 blend . other likely members of this component are the high - ionization far - uv lines . mg i ] @xmath364571 is a more uncertain member , showing a red deficit if it is correctly identified ; alternatively , it could be a blend of lines , in particular [ fe ii ] @xmath111 , 4583 . the strongest argument for including mg i ] in this component is its temporal evolution , which is similar to that of the [ o i ] and [ o iii ] lines ( [ sec_time ] ) . there is no indication of hydrogen or helium with this type of profile . table [ tab3 ] lists the fluxes of the lines that we designate as having line profiles coming from the intermediate component . as with the narrow lines , the intensity ratios of some of these lines provide constraints on the electron density and temperature . * o iii*. the [ o iii ] @xmath364959 and @xmath365007 lines are strongly blended with each other , and the @xmath364959 line with h@xmath97 . a feature at @xmath112 appears in both the @xmath365007 and @xmath364959 lines , and the ratio of line strengths appears to be consistent with the 3:1 ratio expected from their spontaneous emission probabilities . the red edge of the @xmath365007 line extends to @xmath113 , but not further . the @xmath365007 line also has a strong feature to the red at @xmath114 ; however , it does not appear in [ o iii ] @xmath364363 or in other lines of this kinematic component , so there is a question of whether the feature originates from [ o iii ] or is a blend . its rapid drop in the late - time spectra ( see [ sec_time ] ) argues for the blend interpretation . likely candidates for this feature are he i @xmath115 or [ fe ii ] . broad [ o iii ] @xmath364363 emission is present , although the blue side of the line is disturbed by h@xmath98 emission . neglecting the red feature in the @xmath365007 line , we find @xmath116 from the day 1007 keck spectrum . in the far - uv , the o iii ] @xmath117 intercombination lines are among the strongest uv lines . based on the wavelength , it is unlikely that the he ii @xmath118 line contributes much to this feature . we find a reddening - corrected ratio [ o iii ] @xmath119 . * o ii*. the [ o ii ] @xmath637320 , 7330 doublet is less affected by blending and yields a clearer line profile . the feature at @xmath112 is present , but that at @xmath114 is not . the line profile is asymmetric , although the maximum velocity is @xmath120 to both the blue and the red . as we show in [ sec_result ] , the asymmetry is mainly caused by blending with he i @xmath121 . * o i*. the [ o i ] @xmath109 , 6364 doublet is severely affected by the blue wing of h@xmath2 . narrow components of the [ o i ] doublet , as well as [ fe x ] @xmath122 , also complicate the profile . in [ sec_synt ] we show that the line profile is compatible with that of the other oxygen lines . the auroral [ o i ] @xmath123 line is likely to be present , although it may be distorted by the corresponding night - sky line . we therefore only consider its flux as an upper limit . the presence of the o i recombination line at @xmath367774 is of special interest because it should be accompanied by strong h i recombination emission with the same line profile , if the emission is from material with `` cosmic '' abundances , since hydrogen is more abundant than oxygen by a factor of @xmath124 in such material . the absence of the corresponding hydrogen emission suggests that the emitting gas is oxygen rich . the o i recombination line at @xmath368446 , which is expected to have a strength comparable to the @xmath367774 line , is blended with fe ii lines , and is also affected by fluorescence ( [ sec_fluor ] ) . the emission may be from the oxygen - rich ejecta in the supernova and may extend to relatively high velocity because of hydrodynamic instabilities with the overlying layer ( fryxell et al . 1991 ) and/or a high expansion velocity of the oxygen core ( [ sec_nature ] ) . the lines observed in the short - wavelength g160l _ hst _ spectrum are noisy , so there is uncertainty in the line identifications . the line widths , @xmath125 , point to memberships of most of the uv emissions with the intermediate kinematic component . the line profiles of the strongest lines ( c iv , o iii , and si iii / c iii ) are all consistent with flat - topped profiles of width @xmath126 . except for the @xmath127 feature , which has a central peak , the lines appear symmetric within the noise level . the c iv and si iv lines are also affected by interstellar absorption in the galaxy and the host galaxy . by far the strongest line is ly@xmath2 , whose profile is distorted by geocoronal ly@xmath2 , and possibly by n v @xmath128 . the c iv @xmath129 , 1551 doublet is clearly seen with a boxy profile . the same is true for the feature at @xmath361900 , which can be identified as a blend of si iii ] @xmath361892 and c iii ] @xmath631907 , 1909 . the n iii ] @xmath3517441754 lines are clearly present , although their flux is uncertain . the n iv ] @xmath130 line is near the limit of detection . in figure [ fig4a ] we show the density and temperature constraints from all the oxygen - line ratios of the _ hst _ and keck day 1007 spectra together . we have used a reddening correction @xmath28 mag to obtain @xmath131}~ { \lambda}7774)/i({\rm [ o~ii]}~ { \lambda \lambda}7320 , 7330 ) = 0.43 $ ] , [ o iii ] @xmath132 , and [ o iii ] @xmath133 . the [ o i ] @xmath134 ratio is only an upper limit , @xmath135 , and the curve shown in figure [ fig4a ] therefore only marks an upper boundary to the temperature . implicit in this analysis is that the o i and o iii zones are of similar extent , temperature , and electron density . while the lines coming from the o ii and o iii zones are all compatible with @xmath136 k and @xmath137 , the [ o i ] lines have to arise in a lower temperature and/or lower electron density zone . as shown in chevalier & fransson ( 1994 , hereinafter cf94 ) , both these alternatives are quite natural , because the [ o i ] lines are expected to arise in a partially neutral zone of lower temperature ( see , e.g. , cf94 figures 4 and 5 ) . the velocities observed in the intermediate component suggest that this emission is from freely expanding ejecta . the ejecta are photoionized by x - rays from the circumstellar interaction . this process has been modeled by cf94 , and there is general agreement between the lines that are predicted to be brightest and those that are observed here . because of the strong h@xmath2 line , the broad component dominates the optical emission from the supernova . the total luminosity in h@xmath2 was @xmath138 on day 1007 , using @xmath28 mag . the line profile of h@xmath2 is shown in figure [ fig4 ] . there is no obvious distinction of different components in h@xmath2 , as we demonstrate in [ sec_result ] , and no clear evidence for any velocity structure within the line , although a slight emission deficit can be seen on the red side of the line . the fwhm of the line is @xmath139 on day 1007 . the wings are very extended and reach at least 10,000 @xmath0 . table [ tab4 ] gives a list of the lines that have profiles similar to that of h@xmath2 , although we can trace the high - velocity wings above @xmath140 only for h@xmath2 . besides h@xmath2 , the best - defined line profile from this component is he i @xmath141 , which is very similar to h@xmath2 up to @xmath142 , where the line is lost in the noise . the broad component is dominated by lines of h i , he i , mg ii , and fe ii . the interpretation of the mg ii @xmath632796 , 2803 doublet is complicated by absorption features arising in gas in our galaxy and in the host galaxy of sn 1995n . the line peak is at negative velocities , at @xmath143 , which may be a result of resonance - line scattering of the @xmath144 photons by the @xmath145 component , as well as the influence of the interstellar absorption lines . the line appears considerably broader than h@xmath2 , and shows a clear deficit of emission to the red of line center ( fig . [ fig4 ] ) . as discussed in [ sec_fluor ] , the extended profile is likely to be caused by blending with mg i @xmath146 and with the strong fe ii resonance lines in this region of the spectrum , expected to be present on either side of the wings ( multiplets 399 , 391 , 380 at @xmath147 , and multiplet 373 at @xmath148 ) , due to the ly@xmath2 fluorescence . although almost all of the many fe ii lines present are blended with each other , it appears that they belong to the broad kinematic component . the only reasonably isolated fe ii line is @xmath149 , whose profile is well fitted by a scaled h@xmath2 profile . in the optical spectra , the region 40005500 contains a large number of fe ii lines , often seen in supernovae and active galactic nuclei ( agns ; e.g. , filippenko 1989 ; osterbrock 1989 ) . comparing with spectra of narrow - line seyfert 1 galaxies such as i zw 1 ( phillips 1976 , 1977 ) , and the symbiotic star rr tel ( crawford et al . 1999 ) , we have identified members of fe ii multiplets 14 , 27 , 28 , 27 , 42 , 48 , 49 , and 74 ( table [ tab4 ] ) . the lines listed in table [ tab4 ] are those that can be identified with reasonable certainty . most of the other members of the multiplets are blended with strong lines . one should also note that the fluxes of all fe ii lines , with the possible exception of the @xmath149 line , are highly uncertain . in the uv , the plateau between @xmath150 and @xmath151 , except for mg ii , is dominated by fe ii resonance lines . because of the extreme blending of lines , which creates a pseudo - continuum , we do not attempt any complete identification in this spectral region . we simply note that there are some distinct features such as fe ii @xmath152 and fe ii @xmath153 . the latter lines are of special interest , because they arise from cascades from highly excited levels , and are usually considered an indicator of fluorescence . except for this , the uv part of the spectrum is similar to that of i zw 1 ( e.g. , fig . 2d in laor et al . 1997 ) . in the near - ir , it is especially interesting to note that many of the features can only be identified with fe ii emission based on models of ly@xmath2 fluorescence of the transitions ( johansson & jordan 1984 ; penston 1987 ; sigut & pradhan 1998a ) . sigut & pradhan ( 1998b ) , who discuss this process in detail for agns , provide a detailed list of the predicted lines , yielding many identifications for sn 1995n . the best example of ly@xmath2 fluorescence is probably the feature at @xmath154 , which is difficult to explain with other mechanisms . based on other paschen lines , a significant contribution of h i is unlikely , and he i lines are also excluded by similar arguments , as well as by their wavelengths . another candidate , mg ii @xmath155 , also has the wrong wavelengths . in [ sec_fluor ] we show explicitly how the inclusion of these lines improves the spectral fit . finally , we point out the very strong he i @xmath156 line in the vlt day 1769 spectrum , which is the only spectrum covering this region . although there are many lines observed with the high - velocity component , the only straightforward diagnostic of the physical conditions is given by the lack of forbidden - line emission . in the case of the broad - line regions of agns , this is taken to indicate a density @xmath157 ( e.g. , osterbrock 1989 ) . this should be taken with some caution , however , because the gas is only partially ionized by the hard x - rays ( cf94 ) ; high - ionization lines like [ o iii ] @xmath158 and c iii ] @xmath159 are therefore unlikely to be present . the only forbidden lines expected are [ o i ] @xmath160 , which are suppressed relative to permitted lines for @xmath161 . as we discuss in [ sec_result ] , the large h@xmath2/h@xmath97 ratio , as well as the ca ii line ratios , strongly argue that @xmath162 , which is a likely lower limit for the broad component . the emission is presumably from a radius that is similar to the radius of the narrow - line emission , and the gas is thus exposed to a radiation field that is comparable to that of the narrow - line gas . the high density results in an ionization parameter that is a factor @xmath163 smaller than that for the narrow - line gas , or @xmath164 . the result is low ionization of the gas , as observed . the ionization is much less than that in the broad - line regions of agns , where lines like c iv @xmath361549 are observed . to determine abundances as well as deblend the most important lines of the intermediate and broad components , we have calculated synthetic spectra based on the combined uv - optical _ hst_/keck spectrum from [ sec_obs ] . the model we employ is a simple two - component model , with constant physical parameters and abundances in each of the components . the temperature , densities , and abundances are taken as input parameters . for each of the two components we assume a given emissivity profile with velocity . the emissivities of the h and he lines are given by case - b recombination , except for h@xmath2 , which is multiplied by some factor to account for collisions and optical - depth effects . the he i @xmath353889 , 7065 lines are also adjusted by a common factor to account for optical - depth effects ( see osterbrock 1989 , p. 105 ) . all lines from metals are calculated as multilevel atoms for a given temperature and density . the ionization fractions for a given ionization stage ( such as c iii , n iii , o iii , and si iii ) are assumed to be the same . the continuum is due to h i , he i , and he ii bound - free and two - photon continua , consistent with the recombination lines . we do not attempt to include the many fe ii lines present , nor lines from the narrow component . the temperature and ionization are not calculated self - consistently , as in cf94 , so only the relative line fluxes for a given ion , or group of ions , are testing the model . the model should therefore mainly be viewed as a diagnostic tool . for the line profiles we adjust the variation of the emissivity with velocity so that a best fit is obtained ( eq . [ eq_a ] ) . for spherical symmetry and for a velocity @xmath165 , the flux at wavelength @xmath36 is given by @xmath166 ) r \ , dr , \label{eq_a}\ ] ] where @xmath167 is the source function and @xmath168 is the optical depth . in the optically thin limit @xmath169 \approx j(r)$ ] , where @xmath170 is the emissivity . the limits of integration are given by @xmath171 , and @xmath172 , where @xmath173 is the maximum ejecta velocity and @xmath174 is the speed of light . this characterization of the line profile is appropriate for freely expanding ejecta ; free expansion is assumed in our synthetic spectral models . as discussed in 6.1.3 , this assumption may not apply to the broad component . in this case , the line profile should be viewed as an empirical fit that is applied to the set of lines . we find that the profile of the h i , he i , mg ii , and fe ii lines can be well reproduced with an emissivity [ or , if @xmath175 , a source function @xmath167 ] which is constant inside 1000 @xmath0 and decreasing like @xmath177 outside , out to about @xmath178 . for the metal lines , except for mg ii and fe ii , we have used a constant - emissivity shell with @xmath179 constant for @xmath180 . in figure [ fig5 ] we show the spectrum of a model where all elements , including h , he , and metals , have the same density and temperature , @xmath181 and @xmath182 k. the total metallicity is close to solar . note that the temperature , density , and metallicity are only indicative , and depend on the assumed total emissivity , @xmath183 . the fit gives a good general representation of most lines , in terms of both the relative fluxes and line profiles . in particular , many of the profiles that seem fairly complicated at first sight are well reproduced as a result of blends by several lines . good examples are the [ o i ] + h@xmath2 complex , and the [ o iii ] + h@xmath97 feature at 48005000 . the model , however , severely underproduces the strength of the important o i @xmath1847774 recombination line . this could have been anticipated already from figure [ fig4a ] , which shows that the relative [ o iii ] ratios can be reproduced either with a high - temperature , low - density model , as in figure [ fig5 ] , or with a low temperature and a high density . the [ o ii ] @xmath357320 + 7330/o i @xmath1847774 ratio can , however , only be reproduced with the latter temperature / density combination . the relative fluxes of the oxygen and hydrogen / helium lines then require a very high oxygen abundance , unless the o ii and o iii zones are unreasonably large compared to the zone responsible for the h i and he i recombination lines . for the same extent , the relative flux in o i @xmath1847774 and h i lines is given by [ @xmath1857774)@xmath186/ [ j_{\rm eff}({\rm h~i } ) n({\rm h~ii})]$ ] . because @xmath185 7774 ) @xmath187 ) , this shows that @xmath188 and @xmath189 must be of the same order of magnitude . as an alternative , we show a model with a greatly increased metal abundance ( fig . [ fig5b ] ) . although these lines are likely to arise in different ionization zones , we find that we can get an acceptable fit to all lines with a density @xmath190 and a temperature @xmath191 k. all metal lines , except mg ii and fe ii , are assumed to have a shell - like emissivity profile . compared to figure [ fig5 ] we see that , because of the high oxygen abundance , now both [ o ii ] @xmath357320 , 7330 and o i @xmath1847774 , as well as the strengths relative to the h i lines , are well reproduced . in addition , the o i @xmath1848446 recombination line contributes appreciably to the feature at @xmath192 . we also note the good fit to the o i @xmath1847774 line profile , further strengthening this identification . to reproduce the observed h@xmath2/h@xmath97 ratio , the h@xmath2 strength has to be increased by a factor of @xmath193 above recombination . the reddening - corrected ly@xmath2/h@xmath2 ratio is @xmath194 , while the case - b ratio is @xmath195 . the flux of ly@xmath2 is , however , highly uncertain , because the line profile is disturbed by geocoronal ly@xmath2 , in spite of the recession velocity of sn 1995n . as the self - consistent models in cf94 show , this occurs because of collisional excitation in combination with a high optical depth for h@xmath2 in the partially ionized zone . as both the calculations in cf94 and similar models for agns ( e.g. , kwan & krolik 1981 ) show , this requires the presence of hard x - rays from the shocked region in combination with a density @xmath196 . the higher - order balmer lines are well explained by case - b recombination . the helium lines are well reproduced by pure recombination , except for he i @xmath1843889 and he i @xmath1847065 . the former is down by a factor of @xmath197 , and consequently the he i @xmath1847065 line is increased by a factor of @xmath198 , which strongly indicates that the he i @xmath1843889 line is optically thick ( e.g. , osterbrock 1989 , p. 105 ) . the relative ratio of the he i and h i fluxes results in a he ii / h ii abundance of @xmath199 by number . because the he ii and h ii ionization zones are likely to coincide ( e.g. , cf94 ) , the he ii / h ii ratio is probably close to the elemental he / h abundance ratio . strong he i lines are also present in sn 1986j ( rupen et al . 1987 ; leibundgut et al . 1991 ) and at early times in many sne iin ( e.g. , filippenko 1997 ) . the jump at @xmath200 is mainly caused by high - order balmer lines and the balmer continuum . the two - photon continuum dominates in most of the uv , as well as in the optical . the form of the balmer continuum is sensitive to the temperature in the zone where this is formed , and a somewhat better fit is obtained for @xmath201 k. in a one - zone model , however , this temperature gives a worse fit to the metal lines . more detailed models ( cf94 ) show that both temperature and ionization vary within the emitting regions . the ca ii lines in the spectrum are interesting . the ir triplet lines at @xmath358498 , 8542 , 8662 are clearly present , while for the h&k lines and the forbidden @xmath357291.5 , 7323.9 lines we can only set upper limits . fransson & chevalier ( 1989 ) and ferland & persson ( 1989 ) have discussed the relative strengths of these lines as a function of density and temperature . using their results we find that the fact that @xmath2027291.5 , 7323.9)/@xmath2028498 , 8542 , 8662 ) @xmath203 and @xmath17(h&k)/@xmath2028498 , 8542 , 8662 ) @xmath204 means that the density must be @xmath157 . this result is only weakly sensitive to the temperature . the parts of the spectrum which are not well fitted by the model can in most cases be identified with regions of strong fe ii emission . this includes the uv between @xmath205 , some regions in the range 4200 to 5300 , the @xmath1847155 line , and the fluorescence lines above @xmath206 ( see below ) . in figure [ fig6 ] we show the line profiles and fits of the h@xmath2 , [ o i ] , [ o ii ] , and [ o iii ] lines to illustrate the fits for our assumed radial emissivity model . the figure also demonstrates the complex spectrum which results from the blending of the individually fairly simple line profiles . turning now to the other metal lines coming from the intermediate - velocity component , the uv line - intensity ratios require n / c @xmath207 and o / n @xmath208 , by number . the high n / c ratio , in combination with the relatively large o / n ratio , strongly indicates incomplete cno processing in this component . while the profiles of the high - ionization c , n , o , and si lines in the far - uv are consistent with the same shell - like emissivity as the oxygen lines , this emissivity model shows a bad fit of the mg ii @xmath352796 , 2803 line . the peaked profile shows that this line is instead likely to originate in the h and he - rich broad - line component , rather than in the metal - rich component . based on the fe ii ly@xmath2 fluorescence calculation by sigut & pradhan ( 1998a , b ) , we have modeled the near - ir spectrum of sn 1995n . we have used the same model as in figure [ fig5b ] , but now added the fe ii lines , with wavelengths and fluxes from the list of sigut & pradhan . the line profiles were assumed to be the same as that of h@xmath2 . in the upper panel of figure [ fig4b ] we show the resulting spectrum , while in the lower panel we show for comparison the spectrum without fe ii lines . the observations are from the day 1769 vlt spectrum , but the day 716 and 1037 lick spectra show the same features . the day 1007 keck spectrum only extends to @xmath209 . as can be seen , there is a striking improvement with the observed features between 8000 and 9500 when the fe ii lines are included . in particular , the feature at @xmath154 can be identified with the fe ii @xmath359071 , 9128 , 9177 lines , and provides a good fit both in wavelength and profile of the blend . one of the strongest expected fluorescence - pumped fe ii lines is at @xmath368451 , and there is indeed a strong feature at this wavelength . another possible identification for this feature is the recombination line of o i @xmath368446 . this line is normally accompanied by o i @xmath367774 , which is not present in the broad component ( although it is visible in the intermediate component ; see [ sec_result ] ) . the recombination contribution to the @xmath1848446 line is expected to be close to the @xmath367774 line , and is therefore insufficient to explain this strong feature . the @xmath368446 line can be produced by fluorescence through the ly@xmath97 line ( grandi 1980 ) . leibundgut et al . ( 1991 ) identified the o i @xmath368446 line in the spectrum of sn 1986j . the ly@xmath97 o i @xmath368446 fluorescence also results in a strengthened o i @xmath1841300 multiplet . due to its narrowness , however , this is likely to be absorbed by the o i in the host galaxy . in our keck day 1007 spectrum of sn 1995n , the center of the emission feature gives a better match to fe ii @xmath368451 than to o i @xmath368446 . an additional argument in favor of this mechanism is that fe ii @xmath352506 , 2508 , which is indicative of ly@xmath2 pumping , is the strongest fe ii feature in the uv . this has previously been seen in @xmath210 carina , rr tel , and kq pup ( baratta , cassatella , & viotti 1995 ; johansson & jordan 1984 ; redfors & johansson 2000 ) . other lines in the uv expected to be enhanced by fluorescence are the fe ii multiplets 399 , 391 , and 380 at 2850 , multiplet 373 at 2770 , and multiplet 363 at 2530 . these most likely contribute to the broad wings of the mg ii lines , but are too blended to be uniquely identified . ir lines at @xmath211 m are also expected to be strong ( johansson & hamann 1993 ) , but are outside our observed wavelength range . given that the model was intended for conditions in an agn , the fit is surprisingly good . only at @xmath212 are there a few features ( such as at @xmath213 ) which are not well reproduced , but the noise level at these wavelengths is considerable . one should also note that the relative strengths depend on the uncertain atomic data , as well as on the exact ly@xmath2 profile . in particular , the larger line width in sn 1995n compared with those assumed in the agn calculation by sigut & pradhan ( 1998a , b ) model can change the results appreciably . sigut & pradhan assumed a static ly@xmath2 profile with only damping included . an expanding medium means that the ly@xmath2 line can feed many more fluorescence channels , which is likely to enhance the fluorescence effects . finally , we note the strong he i @xmath18410830 line in the day 1769 spectrum . although the region beyond @xmath214 becomes increasingly noisy , this feature clearly stands out above the noise level . compared to the strength expected by pure recombination , it is enhanced by collisional excitation by a factor of @xmath193 , which is common in many objects ( e.g. , osterbrock 1989 , p. 111 ) . in figure [ fig6a ] we show the evolution of the reddening - corrected h@xmath2 luminosity with time on a linear - log scale . we see that the evolution can be well approximated with an exponential decay , @xmath215 , where @xmath216 days . this is much longer than the @xmath217co decay time scale , and we conclude that the circumstellar interaction is responsible for the longevity , although there is no obvious explanation for this particular time dependence . an efficient way of displaying the change of the spectrum with time is to plot the ratio of two spectra as a function of wavelength . in figure [ fig7a ] we show a running average taken over 2 of the day 1799 vlt and day 1007 keck spectra . the presence of two separate components in the spectrum is apparent . while most of the spectrum has decreased by a factor of @xmath218 , the intermediate - component [ o i ] , [ o ii ] , and [ o iii ] lines only decreased by a factor of 23 . the o i @xmath1847774 line shows a similar decrease , while the @xmath1848450 feature follows the h i lines , consistent with it being mainly due to fe ii fluorescence lines . in addition , mg i ] @xmath1844571 belongs to the class of slowly declining lines . relative to h@xmath97 , the peak fluxes of the [ o i ] and [ o ii ] lines increased by a factor of @xmath219 between 1997 and 1999 , while the [ o iii ] line increased by a more modest factor of @xmath220 between these observations . the [ o iii ] @xmath354959 , 5007/@xmath1844363 ratio remained nearly constant at @xmath221 , while the o i @xmath1847774/[o ii ] @xmath357320 , 7330 ratio decreased from @xmath222 to @xmath223 . repeating the analysis in [ sec_interm ] ( fig . [ fig4a ] ) , we find that the temperature in the oxygen - rich gas had not changed much , while the electron density decreased from @xmath224 to @xmath225 . this is less than expected from a simple @xmath226 law , but our analysis assumes that the relative sizes of the o ii and o iii zones remain constant , and that the temperatures and densities in these two zones are similar . neither of these conditions is obviously satisfied . in addition , the supernova may be older than our estimate , and the uncertainties in the relative fluxes are considerable . nevertheless , the behavior is qualitatively that expected for expanding ejecta . in figure [ fig7 ] we show the relative change of h@xmath2 , [ o i ] @xmath356300 , 6364 , [ o ii ] @xmath357320 , 7330 , and [ o iii ] @xmath354959 , 5007 on a velocity scale . while the [ o i ] and [ o ii ] line profiles changed by roughly the same factor over the whole velocity range , @xmath227 to @xmath228 , the red side of the [ o iii ] line decreased by a large factor relative to the blue . the most conceivable reason for the rapid [ o iii ] change is that blending with another line , decreasing similarly to the h i and he i component , causes the apparent decrease in the red wing . the most likely candidates for this are the he i @xmath355015 , 5049 and fe ii lines . the blue side behaved in a manner similar to the [ o i ] and [ o ii ] lines . we therefore conclude that there is little change in the overall profiles of the oxygen lines . when comparing the width of the best - isolated [ o ii ] line , we find a nearly constant blue extension , while the width on the red side decreased by @xmath229 during this period . the evolution of the h@xmath2 line profile differs dramatically from that of the oxygen lines . as shown in the upper - left panel of figure [ fig7 ] , the red wing up to @xmath142 decreased by almost a factor of 4 relative to the blue , with a maximum decrease at @xmath230 . to further illustrate the different evolution of the wings of h@xmath2 , we have reflected the blue component in the spectra from 1996 1999 ( fig . [ fighaevol ] ) , so that the blue and red wings can be compared directly . the fluxes have been normalized to the same peak value . we see that the day 716 lick spectrum ( dashed lines ) showed nearly identical red and blue wings . the day 1007 keck spectrum ( solid lines ) shows a clear evolution in that for a given velocity the red wing decreased faster than the blue wing . this is even more pronounced in the 1999 vlt spectrum , where at @xmath231 the flux of the red wing is only @xmath232% that of the blue wing at the same velocity . equivalently , for a given intensity the red wing has a much smaller extension . for example , at @xmath233% of the peak flux the blue wing extends to @xmath234 , while the red wing only extends to @xmath235 . relative to the peak flux , the blue wing shows a steady increase in flux with time , while the red wing displays the opposite trend . similar evolution is seen for both h@xmath97 and he i @xmath1845876 , although the continuum contribution and line blending make it difficult to compare directly to h@xmath2 . baird et al . ( 1998 ) have presented evidence that the line slowly narrows with time . we can therefore confirm this trend to the latest epochs . the h@xmath2/h@xmath97 ratio in the 1999 spectra decreased somewhat relative to the 1997 and 1996 spectra . this is consistent with the decreasing density during this time interval . the intensity ratio of the he i lines to the balmer lines does not change much . the two he i lines least affected by blending , he i @xmath355876 , 7065 , have almost the same ratio relative to h@xmath97 at all epochs , and are all reproduced with a relative he ii / h ii abundance of @xmath199 by number . together with the similar line profiles , this argues for the fact that the he i and balmer lines arise in the same region . their relative flux should therefore reflect their abundance ratio . in most cases the fluxes of the narrow lines are uncertain , especially in the day 1799 spectrum . for the strongest lines , like [ o iii ] @xmath1845007 and [ fe vii ] @xmath1846087 , the decrease is by a factor of 510 , with no systematic distinction between lines from different elements . although the flux of the [ o iii ] @xmath236 line is especially uncertain due to the underlying broad component , there is an indication for an increase in the [ o iii ] @xmath1845007/@xmath1844363 ratio from @xmath237 to @xmath238 . however , because this ratio depends on both density and temperature , one can not directly translate this into a unique change in either of these parameters . the general scenario for the emission from sn 1995n and related supernovae ( generally type iin ) is interaction of the supernova ejecta with circumstellar gas . our spectra of sn 1995n show that the interaction is complex , but that there is sufficient diagnostic information on the emission components to deduce some of the interaction details . all the emission components are likely to be heated and ionized by the energetic radiation from the interaction region . based on the unresolved line widths , the density of @xmath239 , and the low filling factor , the narrow - line emission can be identified with clumps in the preshock circumstellar gas . the velocity is likely to be @xmath240 , typical of the circumstellar media of red supergiants . the intermediate - velocity component is identified with unshocked supernova ejecta . the maximum velocity in this component suggests either that the reverse shock front has a minimum velocity of @xmath241 , or alternatively that the emission is coming from a component which is photoionized by the shock but only extends in abundance to this velocity . the fact that this component is only seen as dense , oxygen - rich gas makes it natural to identify it as processed gas from the core . assuming that the oxygen core expands at @xmath113 , the typical oxygen density will be @xmath242 where @xmath102 is the filling factor of this component in the core , and we have assumed an oxygen - dominated composition . with @xmath243 , as was the case for sn 1987a ( e.g. , spyromilio & pinto 1991 ) , the density is of the same order as found from the [ o iii ] and similar lines . we note that the density deduced from the models is based on the assumption that the temperatures and densities are the same in the o i , o ii , and o iii zones . a velocity of @xmath241 is high for the oxygen core of a type iip or type iil supernova , but in the range found in type ib / ic supernovae , as well as in the type iib sn 1993j ( e.g. , houck & fransson 1996 ; matheson et al . this is an important result because it is consistent with a picture where the progenitor has lost most of its hydrogen - rich envelope before the explosion . while most of the hydrogen - rich gas comes from gas moving at velocities of @xmath244 , there is a smooth extension to @xmath83 . any model must explain the wide range of velocities for this component . in particular , the fact that there appears to be hydrogen - rich , cool gas moving at up to @xmath245 implies that there are some regions where the shock region extends considerably beyond the reverse shock front . to explain this , one may identify three main alternatives for the broad , hydrogen - rich component . the first possibility is that it comes primarily from unshocked , freely expanding ejecta , extending from low - velocity hydrogen in the core up to the maximum ejecta velocity . a second possibility is that it comes from shocked ejecta gas , behind the reverse shock . the final possibility is that it comes from shocked circumstellar gas , either in the form of clumps or a more uniform medium . our synthetic spectral models in 4 are appropriate for the first possibility . before discussing these possibilities , we note that the ca ii lines , the absence of forbidden lines , and the h@xmath2/h@xmath97 ratio indicate a density @xmath157 for this component ( [ sec_result ] ) . a further independent lower limit to the density can be obtained by considering the state of ionization in this gas . the luminosity in h@xmath2 was @xmath246 on day 1007 ( [ sec_broad ] ) . typically , the conversion efficiency from x - rays to h@xmath2 is @xmath247% ( cf94 ) , indicating a total x - ray luminosity of @xmath248 . this is much more than was observed by _ rosat _ ( fox et al . 2000 ) , but as calculations for sn 1993j showed ( fransson , lundqvist , & chevalier 1996 ) , almost all the x - ray emission can be absorbed in the ejecta and shocked gas , and only the hard x - rays escape the supernova . with this luminosity the ionization parameter on day 1007 is @xmath249 . for a uniform density , hydrogen - dominated envelope expanding at @xmath250 , the density is @xmath251 therefore , if the emission came from unshocked ejecta and @xmath252 , the ionization parameter would be very high , @xmath253 , and one would expect strong emission from ions like [ o iii ] from this component , contrary to the observations . instead , it is dominated by mg ii and fe ii emission , in addition to the h i and he i lines , characteristic of a partially ionized , high - density region ( e.g. , cf94 ) . it is therefore unlikely to come from a uniform - ejecta component , and only if clumping of this component is very high ( @xmath254 ) is an ejecta origin likely . we therefore think the first possibility given above is unlikely . the density in the broad component is much higher than that in the narrow - line component , but the temperature is expected to be only slightly smaller . the conclusion is that the pressure in the gas is relatively high and one possibility is shocked circumstellar or ejecta gas . the gas pressure is @xmath255 k , where @xmath256 is the h density in units of @xmath257 and @xmath258 is the temperature in units of @xmath259 k. the pressure generated by a shock front moving into gas with a density of @xmath260 is @xmath261 k , where @xmath262 is the shock velocity in units of @xmath263 . if the emission is from shocks moving into a medium with a density of this order , the required high density can easily be produced . we can identify two possibilities for such a shocked gas : it could be either clumps caused by instabilities in the shocked ejecta behind the reverse shock , or clumpiness and instabilities of the shocked circumstellar medium . this is similar to the two scenarios discussed by chugai & danziger ( 1994 ) for sn 1988z . _ shocked ejecta : _ this is a version of the scenario discussed for `` normal '' interacting supernovae like sn 1979c or sn 1993j ( cf94 ; fransson et al . the fact that the line profiles in sn 1995n are peaked as opposed to the boxy profiles seen in sn 1993j , however , makes it necessary to modify this scenario . one possibility is that the circumstellar medium is highly asymmetric , as in the picture discussed by blondin , lundqvist , & chevalier ( 1996 ) . indications for a highly asymmetric circumstellar medium are seen in some red supergiants in a superwind phase ( see [ sec_progenitor ] ) . most of the hydrogen emission could in this case come from the cool , dense shell expected behind the reverse shock ( cf94 ) . the shape of the h@xmath2 line profile then reflects the decreasing emission measure as one moves away from the equator . the maximum ejecta velocity is likely to occur at the poles , while the strongest interaction , with most of the energy release , occurs in the high - density circumstellar gas at the equator . the deceleration of the ejecta will therefore be most rapid here . if the hydrogen envelope mass is low , the reverse shock at the equator may rapidly recede to the massive oxygen core . this could qualitatively explain the presence of the high - ionization , oxygen - rich shell observed in the intermediate - component line profiles . the hydrogen - rich gas in the cool shell behind the reverse shock could then be excited by the x - rays from the shock , giving rise to an extended partially ionized zone . a prediction is that the maximum velocity of the shocks , and therefore the line widths , should decrease with time . this general scenario for sn 1995n receives support from observations of the related supernova sn 1986j in ngc 891 , which had a strong h@xmath2 line with fwhm @xmath264 and oxygen lines with widths of several @xmath263 ( leibundgut et al . it was a strong radio source , and vlbi images showed a shell with protrusions extending at least a factor of two beyond the shell radius ( bartel et al . 1989 , 1991 ) . images on different dates revealed expansion ; the outer protrusions are moving at @xmath12 , while the shell is expanding at @xmath241 . these images suggest a picture that is consistent with that deduced from the spectra of sn 1995n . the origin of the protrusions is uncertain , but there are computational simulations that suggest that they could arise from asymmetries or inhomogeneities in the circumstellar medium . blondin et al . ( 1996 ) found that supernova expansion into a circumstellar medium with a density deficit in the polar direction could produce polar protrusions with a radius 24 times that of the main shell . the problem in comparison to the images of sn 1986j is that there are more than two protrusions . jun , jones , & norman ( 1996 ) carried out a simulation of the interaction of a supernova with a clumpy medium and found that the rayleigh - taylor instability that develops where the ejecta are decelerated by the surrounding medium is accentuated by the presence of clumps . the rayleigh - taylor fingers reach the outer shock front . the protrusions in the simulation did not reach the extent required for sn 1986j , but the simulation was run for a limited amount of time and the density of the surrounding medium was uniform . the circumstellar wind case remains to be investigated . _ shocked circumstellar clouds : _ in this scenario , the emission comes from the cool gas behind the slow radiative shocks propagating into the same clumpy gas clouds as are responsible for the narrow - line emission . the blast wave may then propagate in the intercloud medium , while the high - density circumstellar clumps are left behind . the maximum ejecta velocity will decrease only slowly , while the shocked clouds will be accelerated on a time scale which depends on the column density of the clouds . as simulations show ( e.g. , klein , mckee , & colella 1994 ; jun et al . 1996 ) , however , the cloud may gradually be evaporated , and finally be dissolved and merge with the ejecta gas . in this scenario one expects a smooth distribution of gas , with velocities ranging from newly shocked clouds with low velocity , or clouds with very high column density , to gas which has been accelerated to the ejecta velocity . this agrees qualitatively with the observed h@xmath2 line profile . the observed gradual increase of the flux in the blue wing with time is also consistent with this scenario . the decrease in the red wing , however , is not naturally explained , unless it is caused by dust absorption , either from pre - existing dust in the circumstellar gas , or from newly formed dust in the ejecta , as discussed for sn 1998s by gerardy et al . ( 2000 ) . an important question is the location of the energy source for the excitation of the gas , and there are several possibilities . first , the source could be the shock separating the high - velocity hydrogen ejecta from the circumstellar gas . in the uniform - medium case this will be at the highest velocity and also maximum ejecta radius . this is the model discussed by cf94 , and applied to sn 1993j by fransson et al . however , it is difficult to understand the presence of the high - ionization , oxygen - rich shell at only @xmath265 , since most of the x - rays will be absorbed by the unprocessed ejecta between the shock and the oxygen core . in the clumped circumstellar medium case the bow shocks may be distributed over a large radius , and immersed in the expanding ejecta , depending on the time of shocking and their column densities . the oxygen - shell emission is again difficult to explain . it may , however , explain the distributed nature of the hydrogen emission . some clues to realistic scenarios for the structure of the circumstellar medium can be obtained from observations of galactic supergiants in very advanced evolutionary stages . while most red supergiants , like @xmath2 ori , have fairly modest winds with mass - loss rates @xmath266 , there is a handful of massive stars having more extreme mass - loss rates , @xmath267 , often referred to as `` superwinds . '' van loon et al . ( 1999 ) find that two out of eight red supergiants in an lmc sample have mass - loss rates @xmath268 , while the others have moderate mass - loss rates @xmath266 . the best - studied superwind cases are vy cma and irc + 10420 . the nature of the superwind phase is not yet clear , but can be related either to a specific evolutionary phase , occurring for most red supergiants , or to a phase only occurring for a specific mass range . a hint that the latter is the case comes from the fact that both vy cma and irc + 10420 are very luminous stars , with @xmath269 . from evolutionary models wittkowski , langer , & weigelt ( 1998 ) estimate a zero - age main sequence ( zams ) mass of 3040 @xmath270 for vy cma . the mass - loss rate is determined to be @xmath271 for a wind velocity of @xmath272 ( danchi et al . 1994 ) . several authors have found an asymmetric distribution of the circumstellar gas and dust around vy cma . from _ hst _ imaging kastner & weintraub ( 1998 ) find an asymmetric core region with wavelength dependent fwhm @xmath273 cm in the optical . the star itself has a radius of @xmath274 cm . outside of this is an asymmetric reflection nebula with an extent of @xmath275 cm , with the core close to its edge . based on symmetry arguments , kastner & weintraub speculate that this is only one half of a bipolar nebula , with the other half obscured by an opaque equatorial dust disk . the same conclusion is reached by monnier et al . ( 1999 ) from high - resolution observations of the core and extended structure . the supergiant irc + 10420 is similar to vy cma in terms of mass - loss rate and mass , but probably in an even later evolutionary state , intermediate between a red supergiant and a wolf - rayet star . there is also evidence for a disk - like geometry in this case , based on line profiles ( jones et al . 1993 ) and on _ hst _ and ir imaging ( humphreys et al . 1997 ) . wittkowski et al . ( 1998 ) propose that the asymmetric mass loss arises as a result of rapid rotation in the phase preceding the evolution off the hayashi line when the major part of the envelope is lost . vy cma is now estimated to have a mass of @xmath276 , meaning that it has lost @xmath277 to the circumstellar medium . the helium fraction at this phase is @xmath278 by mass . this is lower than , although qualitatively consistent with , our results for sn 1995n , but is obviously sensitive to mixing prescriptions , the exact evolutionary status , and other factors . as an alternative , soker ( 2000 ) proposes that the asymmetric distribution is caused by the concentration of magnetic spots in the equatorial plane , which through the lower photospheric temperature causes dust formation preferentially at the equator . based on these cases , it seems probable that sn 1995n , and other type iin supernovae , arise from progenitors similar to vy cma or irc + 10420 . this is consistent with the high mass - loss rates needed to explain the strong interaction , as reflected in the total luminosity . a low hydrogen envelope mass is needed to explain the large oxygen core velocity . the observed high he / h ratio is also consistent with high mass loss . an asymmetric circumstellar distribution will result in faster expansion of the supernova ejecta in the polar directions , while it will be slowed down by the equatorial disk or torus as modeled by blondin et al . the radius of the inner boundary of the dusty disk in vy cma is estimated to be @xmath279 cm ( monnier et al . if the density in the disk is large enough , the radius of the inner edge would not be much affected by the supernova ejecta . the relative size of the ejecta and obscuring disk would therefore increase with time . if the disk is opaque due to dust , an increasingly large fraction of the ejecta on the far side of the supernova would be obscured . this could explain the fact that the red side of the h@xmath2 line decreased considerably faster than the blue side . the exact temporal evolution depends on the degree of asymmetry of the ejecta . evidence for dusty environments comes from several type ii supernovae . especially interesting are the observations of sn 1998s , where gerardy et al . ( 2000 ) find strong evidence for dust emission . as gerardy et al . discuss , although this dust could in principle be formed in the ejecta , perhaps a more likely interpretation is pre - existing circumstellar dust , heated by the supernova ( see also fassia et al . 2001 ) . from observations of h@xmath280o masers in vy cma , richards , yates , & cohen ( 1998 ) estimate a density of @xmath281 in the masing regions , while other species give a density of @xmath282 , indicating a considerable clumpiness of the circumstellar medium . one then speculates that these masing regions could be related to the high - density clumps needed to decelerate the supernova blast wave . finally , the small fraction of supernovae in this class , @xmath283% ( cappellaro et al . 1993 ) , is at least qualitatively consistent with them coming from a fairly small fraction of the high - mass stars . late - time spectral observations of sn 1995n are presented , covering the uv to near - ir regions . three kinematic components are found , which most likely are powered by x - rays from the interaction of the ejecta and the circumstellar medium of the progenitor . spectral modeling shows evidence of an increased helium abundance , as well as cno burning . the first evidence for ly@xmath2 pumped fluorescence of fe ii lines in supernovae is found . it is likely that other supernovae interacting with their circumstellar media show similar signatures , especially in the near - ir . while the narrow lines come from unshocked circumstellar gas and the intermediate - velocity component from processed ejecta , the high - velocity unprocessed gas has a more uncertain origin . different possibilities based on either clumpy or asymmetric circumstellar media are discussed , without strongly favoring either of these possibilities . the temporal evolution of the processed and unprocessed gas is distinctly different , again emphasizing the different origins of these components . we propose that the progenitors of the narrow - line supernovae ( type iin ) are similar to red supergiants in their superwind phase , as most of the hydrogen - rich gas is expelled in the last @xmath284 years before explosion . this explains the high oxygen core velocity . we also present evidence that the circumstellar medium is either asymmetric or clumpy . we are grateful to anil pradhan and aron sigut for sending us their fluorescence results in detailed form . financial support for this work was provided to a.v.f.s group by nsf grants ast-9417213 and ast-9987438 , by the guggenheim foundation , and by nasa through grants go-6043 , go-6584 , and go-8602 from the space telescope science institute , which is operated by aura , inc . , under nasa contract nas 5 - 26555 . support was also provided to r.a.c . by nasa grant nag5 - 8232 , and to c.f.s group by the swedish space board and swedish research council . some of the data presented herein were obtained at the w. m. keck observatory , which is operated as a scientific partnership among the california institute of technology , the university of california , and nasa ; the observatory was made possible by the generous financial support of the w. m. keck foundation . we thank the staffs at the _ hst _ , eso , lick , and keck observatories for their overall assistance , as well as andrea gilbert , jeff newman , and adam riess for their help with some of the observations . lrlcc 24 may 1995 & 321 & lick 3 m & 3120 10490 & 611 + 67 july 1995 & 364365 & lick 3 m & 3120 10490 & 611 + 1 august 1995 & 390 & lick 3 m & 4260 7040 & 6 + 22 june 1996 & 716 & lick 3 m & 3120 9880 & 6 + 6 february 1997 & 943 & hst & 1140 4780 & 27 + 11 april 1997 & 1007 & keck i & 3910 8880 & 10 + 16 april 1997 & 1012 & lick 3 m & 3160 9870 & 6 + 11 may 1997 & 1037 & lick 3 m & 3120 9880 & 611 + 13 may 1999 & 1769 & vlt & 3635 11680 & 13 + 12 june 1999 & 1799 & vlt & 3908 9187 & 5 + lccrrrrl [ fe xi ] & 7891.8 & 7891.9 & & & 1.2 & 0.12 & + ? & & 7610.3 & & & 0.81 & 0.17 & + [ ar iii ] & 7135.8 & 7135.7 & & & 0.26 & 0.12 & + he i ( n ) & 7065.3 & 7065.5 & & & & 0.11 & + [ ar v ] & 7005.7 & 7005.0 & & & 0.21 & & broad ? + h@xmath2 & 6562.8 & 6563.8 & & & @xmath285 2.1 & 0.78 & + [ fe x ] & 6374.5 & 6375.5 & 1.8 & & 1.3 & & + [ o i ] & 6363.8 & 6363.0 & & & 0.47 & & + [ o i ] & 6300.3 & 6301.0 & 3.0 & & 3.0 & 0.22 & + [ fe vii ] & 6087.0 & 6086.8 & 3.7 & & 2.8 & 0.60 & + [ n ii ] & 5754.6 & 5755.5 & & & 2.2 & & broad ? + [ fe vii ] & 5720.7 & 5721.9 & 3.0 & & 1.6 & 0.7 & + [ fe vi ] & 5677.0 & 5677.5 & & & 0.50 & & + [ fe vii]+[fe vi ] & 5276.4 + 5277.8 & 5278.1 & 6.5 & & 1.9 & & bl . + [ fe vi ] & 5176.0 & 5176.2 & & & 3.3 & 0.11 & bl . w. fe ii , fe vii + [ fe vii ] & 5158.9 & 5158.7 & & & & 0.20 & bl . w. fe ii , fe vi + [ fe vi ] & 5145.8 & 5148.2 & & & & 0.19 & bl . w. fe ii , fe vii + [ o iii ] & 5006.8 & 5006.7 & 44 . & & 26 . & 3.5 & + [ o iii ] & 4959.0 & 4958.6 & & & 8.5 & 0.62 & + h@xmath97 & 4861.3 & 4861.6 & & & @xmath2853.6 & 0.51 & + [ ne iv ] & 4725.7 & 4725.4 & & 1.8 & 0.88 & & + [ ne iv ] & 4714.2 - 4715.7 & 4714.8 & & 0.43 ? & 0.41 & & + he ii & 4686 & 4686.0 & & 1.5 & 0.97 & 0.11 & + [ o iii ] & 4363.2 & 4364.0 & 6.5 & 8.3 & 6.4 & 0.53 & + h@xmath98 & 4340.5 & 4341.0 & & & & 0.27 & + [ fe iv ] & 4198.2 & 4198.1 & & & 0.07 & & + ? & & 4187.7 & & & 0.05 & & + [ fe v ] & 4180.6 & 4179.8 & & & 2.1 & & bl . w. he i 4169 + [ fe v ] & 4071.2 & 4070.9 & 3.0 & & 1.3 & 0.11 & + [ fe iii ] ? & 4046.2 & 4045.0 & & & 0.04 & & ident . ? + he i & 4009.3 & 4009.0 & & & 0.10 & & + [ ne iii ] & 3967.5 & 3964.8 & & 3.4 & & & bl . w. he i 3964.1 + [ ne iii ] & 3868.8 & 3868.1 & 20 . & 9.5 & 6.8 & & + [ fe v]+[fe vii ] & 3757.6 + 3758.9 & 3757.7 & 6.3 & 3.4 & 9.0 & & bl . + [ fe vii ] & 3586.3 & 3585.3 & & 2.1 & & & + [ ne v ] & 3425.9 & 3419.0 & 15 . & & & & + [ ne iii ] & 3342.4 & 3343.6 & & 3.8 & & & + lccrrrrl o i & 7771.9 - 7775.3 & 7773.5 & 1.4 & & 2.0 & 1.1 & + [ o ii ] & 7319.9 , 7330.2 & 7326.5 & 5.3 & & 4.6 & 5.4 & bl . w. he i , ca ii + [ o i ] & 6300.3 , 6363.8 & 6335.2 & 4.5 & & 3.2 & 4.4 & + [ o iii ] & 4959.0 , 5006.8 & 5006.7 & 54 . & & 39 . & 9.5 & + mg i ] & 4571.1 & 4574.1 & 1.8 & 1.3 & 1.8 & 1.6 & ( + 4583 ) + [ o iii ] & 4363.2 & 4380.7 & & 5.3 & 4.7 & 1.2 & bl . w. h@xmath97 + mg i & 2852.1 & 2862.3 & & 2.5 & & & bl . w. mg ii & fe ii + si iii ] , c iii ] & 1882.7 , 1892.0 , 1906.7 , 1909.6 & 1899.3 & & 21 . & & & bl . + n iii ] & 1746.8 - 1753.4 & 1752.9 & & 2.1 & & & + o iii ] & 1660.8 , 1666.1 & 1658.8 & & 9.9 & & & + c iv & 1548.9 , 1550.8 & 1548.0 & & 7.6 & & & + n iv ] & 1483.3 - 1487.9 & 1492.5 & & 2.2 & & & flux uncertain + si iv , o iv ] & 1393.8 , 1402.8 , 1397.2 - 1407.4 & 1406.3 & & 6.7 & & & bl . + si ii , o i & 1304.4 , 1309.3 , 1302.2 - 1304.9 & 1310.0 & & 2.1 & & & ident . uncertain + & + lccrrrrl he i & 10830 & 10827.6 & & & & 6.0 & + p@xmath286 , he i,[s iii ] ? & 9545.7 , 9529.3 , 9532.0 & 9544.0 & 3.0 & & & 0.70 & + p@xmath287 & 9229 & & & & & & + fe ii & 9196.9 - 9218.2 & & & & & 0.18 & bl . + fe ii+he i & 9175.9 , 9078.1 , 9174.5 & 9177.5 & 7.0 & & & 1.0&bl . + fe ii & 9122.9 , 9132.4 & 9133.8 & 2.0 & & & 0.39 & bl . + fe ii & 9070.5 , 9077.4 & 9071 & 0.54 & & & 0.07 & bl . + p@xmath210 & 9014 & & & & & 0.07 & bl . + ca ii & 8662.1 & 8668.2 & & & 0.27 & & bl . h i , ca ii + h i & 8598.3 & 8601.7 & & & 0.07 & & bl . + h i , ca ii & 8545.4 + 8542.1 & 8545.9 & 0.20 & & 0.22 & & bl . + ca ii & 8498.0 & 8496.9 & & & 0.80 & & bl . + o i + fe ii & 8446.5 + 8451.0 & 8448.1 & 8.4 & & 3.5 & 0.88 & bl . + he i & 8285.4 & 8287.3 & 0.16 & & 0.12 & 0.05 & + fe ii & 8228.9 & 8227.7 & 0.72 & & 0.53 & 0.11 & + he i & 8155.8 & 8156.3 & & & 0.02 & 0.02 & + he i & 7971.6 & 7970.7 & 0.08 & & 0.22 & 0.05 & + ? & & 7892.0 & & & 0.14 & & narrow ? + ? & & 7610.4 & & & 0.07 & & narrow ? + he i & 7281.0 & 7277.7 & & & 0.46 & & bl . w. [ o ii ] + fe ii & 7155.1 , 7172.0 & 7156.7 & & & 0.21 & & mult . 14 + he i & 7065.3 & 7063.5 & 2.0 & & 1.2 & 0.40 & + he i & 6678.2 & 6675.6 & 0.60 & & 0.33 & & + h@xmath2 & 6562.8 & 6562.4 & 330 . & & 160 . & 30 . & + [ o i ] & 6300.3 , 6363.8 & 6335.2 & 4.5 & & 3.2 & 4.4 & + fe ii & 6148 , 6149 & 6146.3 & & & 0.19 & & mult . 74 + he i & 5875.7 & 5876.4 & 3.8 & & 2.5 & 0.88 & + [ n ii ] & 5754.6 & 5753.5 & 0.39 & & 0.27 & 0.11 & + fe ii & 5534.9 & 5533.2 & & & 0.13 & & mult . 55 , bl . w. [ o i ] 5577 + fe ii & 5414.1 , 5425.3 & 5421.1 & & & 0.18 & & mult . 48 + 49 + fe ii & 5362.9 & 5367.1 & & & 0.22 & & mult . 48 + fe ii & 5316.2 & 5317.9 & & & 0.54 & & mult . 49 + fe ii & 5265 , 5276.0 & 5273.9 & & & 0.10 & & mult . 48 + 49 + fe ii & 5169.0 & 5169.5 & 2.6 & & 1.0 & & mult . w. [ fe vi ] , [ fe vii ] + fe ii & 4629.3 & 4627.6 & & & 0.25 & & mult . 37 + h@xmath97 & 4861.3 & 4861.6 & 8.8 & & 4.3 & 1.2 & + he ii & 4685.7 & 4686.0 & 0.77 & 0.24 & 0.26 & & + he i & 4471.5 & 4470.7 & 1.1&0.63 & 0.68 & 0.26 & + [ o iii ] & 4363.2 & 4380.7 & & 5.4 & 4.7 & 1.2&bl . w. h@xmath97 + h@xmath98 & 4340.5 & 4341.0 & & 4.6 & 3.4 & 1.1&bl . w. [ o iii ] + fe ii & 4233.2 & 4238.9 & & & 0.48 & & mult . 27 + fe ii & 4178.9 & 4180.3 & & & 0.22 & & mult . w. [ fe v ] 4180 + he i & 4120.8 & 4122.4 & & & ? & & + h@xmath288 & 4101.7 & 4102.3 & 1.7 & & 1.6 & 0.78 & + [ ne iii ] , h@xmath286 & 3967.5 , 3970.0 & 3967.8 & 2.2 & & 0.93 & 0.30 & blend w. fe v , h@xmath286 + h@xmath287 & 3889.0 & & & & & & + he i & 3888.6 & & 1.5 & & & & + h@xmath210 & 3835.4 & & 1.2&1.1 & & & + [ ne v ] & 3426 & 3447 & 1.8 & & & & + ? & ? , & 3075.4 & & 0.58 & & & uncert . + ? & ? , & 3001.1 & & 0.35 & & & uncert . + o iii & ? , & 2983.5 & & 0.36 & & & uncert . + fe ii , [ mg v ] & 2926.6 , 2928.3 & 2925.8 & & 0.23 & & & mult . 60 , ident . + mg ii & 2795.5 , 2802.7 & 2793.3 & & 130 . & & & + he i + al ii ] & 2663.4 + 2669.2 & 2666.3 & & 0.71 & & & + fe ii & 2614.9 - 2631.0 & 2617.7 & & 3.9 & & & mult . 1 + 171 + fe ii & 2585.9 -2593.7 & 2592.0 & & 0.85 & & & mult . 1 + 64 + fe ii & 2562.5 , 2563.5 & 2561.3 & & 0.35 & & & mult . 64 + fe ii & 2506.4 - 2508.3 & 2505.6 & & 2.0 & & & + ly@xmath2 & 1215 & 1210.9 & & 300 . & & + . Abstract:

Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.

Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered . Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video . Paper: the development of multi - functional codes capable of predicting quantum transport properties of complex systems is an increasingly active field of research@xcite . this is driven in part by the top - down scaling of the active elements within cmos devices , for which quantum effects are becoming important . it is also driven by the bottom - up demands of communities working on single - molecule electronics and low - dimensional systems , where structures and molecules of increasing size and complexity are of interest . in particular , multi - functional codes are needed to describe the fundamental properties of quasi - two - dimensional materials such as graphene , silicene , germanene and their integration into workable devices . the need to understand the interplay between all of the above structures and their surrounding environments creates further demands for such codes . at a more fundamental level , over the past forty years , a standard model of electron transport has been developed , based on computing the scattering matrix of quantum systems connected to external sources and there is a need for a universal code which describes the many realizations of such systems under a common umbrella . a key task of any quantum transport code is to start from the hamiltonian describing a system and calculate the quantum - mechanical scattering matrix @xmath0 , from which a wide range of measurable quantities can be predicted . unfortunately for most nanoscale systems of interest , the full many - body atomistic hamiltonian is too complex to allow this task to be completed and therefore one usually resorts to a description based on a mean - field hamiltonian . the system of interest is then composed of a scattering region , connected to external crystalline leads , which are in turn connected to external reservoirs . the problem of computing the scattering matrix for such a system described by an arbitrary mean - field hamiltonian is solved in reference @xcite . the main question therefore is how to obtain the correct mean - field hamiltonian . the simplest mean - field approach to describing quantum transport through nanostructures is to build a tight - binding hamiltonian , which reproduces key electronic properties near the fermi energy . this approach has been available for more than half a century and is still popular today when describing generic properties of materials such as graphene@xcite . tight binding parameters can be obtained by fitting to known band structures and then varied spatially to describe external fields and other perturbations . however such an approach does not easily capture the effects of interfaces between different materials or edge terminations of finite - size systems , whose properties are distinct from those of bulk materials . nor does it easily describe finite - voltage effects . to capture these additional features of inhomogeneous systems , a more material - specific approach is needed . this problem was solved in part by the non - equilibrium green s function technique@xcite , that combines with density functional theory ( dft)@xcite to obtain the self - consistent mean - field hamiltonian of the system subject to a finite bias voltage and from it , the lesser green s functions providing the non - equilibrium electronic density and current . this approach is utilized within the smeagol code@xcite , which was the first to describe spin - dependent and finite - voltage transport properties of systems with inhomogeneous magnetic moments and in the presence of spin - orbit scattering . it is almost 10 years since the release of smeagol and during this period , we have developed a new code with increased speed , versatility and functionality , which is particularly suited to the modeling of larger - scale nanostructures , interacting with their environments . this new code is called gollum and will be freely available from _ http://www.physics.lancs.ac.uk/gollum _ within the coming weeks . our previous experience in the development of smeagol@xcite allowed us to understand that non - equilibrium transport codes are quite difficult to handle , in part because of their complex input data structures , which can create a steep learning curve , and also because they carry very heavy computational demands . as a consequence , we have devised the new code gollum to be more user friendly , with simple and easy to understand input and output structures , and having no accuracy parameters to tune . we present now a short summary of the features and functionalities of the two programs to better appreciate its differences . smeagol is a negf program that computes the charge and spin transport properties of two - terminal junctions subject to a finite voltage bias . smeagol can not read a user - defined tight - binding hamiltonian . instead , it reads the mean - field hamiltonian from the program siesta@xcite and is tightly bound to the old versions of it . smeagol can read from siesta hamiltonians carrying non - collinear spin arrangements as well as the spin - orbit interaction . siesta and smeagol have indeed been used successfully to simulate the magnetic anisotropies of atomic clusters@xcite and the spin transport functionalities of several atomic chains and molecular junctions subjected to strong spin - orbit interaction@xcite . however , smeagol does not profit from other recent density functionals . examples are the van der waals family of functionals or those based on the lda+u approach . gollum is a program that computes the charge and spin , and the electronic contribution to the thermal transport properties of multi - terminal junctions . in contrast to negf codes , gollum is based on equilibrium transport theory , which means that it has a simpler structure , it is faster and consumes less memory . the program has been designed for user - friendliness and takes a considerable leap towards the realization of ab initio multi - scale simulations of conventional and more sophisticated transport functionalities . the simpler interface of gollum allows it to read model tight - binding hamiltonians . furthermore , gollum has been designed to interface easily with any dft code that uses a localized basis set . it currently reads information from all the latest public flavors of the codes siesta@xcite and fireball@xcite . these include functionals that handle the spin - orbit or the van der waals interactions , or that include strong correlations in the spirit of the lda+u approach . plans to generate interfaces to other codes are underway . two- and three - dimensional topological materials display fascinating spin transport properties . gollum can simulate junctions made of these materials either using parametrized tight - binding hamiltonians@xcite , or dft@xcite . dft does not handle correctly strong electronic correlation effects , that are inherent many nano - scale electrical junctions . as a consequence , a number of negf programs like smeagol underestimate such effects . gollum includes several tools to handle strong correlations . these include the above - mentioned interface to the versions of siesta containing the lda+u functional . a second tool uses a phenomenological but effective approach called the scissors correction scheme . a third tool maps the dft hamiltonian into an anderson - like hamiltonian that is handled with an impurity solver in the spirit of dynamical mean field theory . the lighter computational demands required by gollum make it possible to construct conductance statistics relevant to break - junction and stm measurements of single - molecule conductances , therefore making closer contact with experiments . gollum also incorporates an interface with some classical molecular dynamics programs , which enables it to handle interactions with the environment . gollum makes use of the concept of _ virtual leads _ , that allows it to integrate easily a wide range of phenomena by the use of tight - binding hamiltonians . these include spintronics , superconductivity , kondo physics and topological phases . in contrast with smeagol , which only computes the magnitudes of transmission coefficients of two - terminal junctions , gollum has access to the full scattering matrix of a multi - terminal junction , enabling it to compute scattering amplitudes , phases and wigner delay times and thereby describe the properties of quantum pumps . even though gollum is based on equilibrium transport theory , our experience with the use of the negf code smeagol has enabled us to incorporate non - equilibrium physics into the mean - field hamiltonian . gollum has therefore the ability to compute non - equilibrium current - voltage curves . in this article , our aim is to describe the structure of the code and then present a set of demonstrator calculations . the latter will illustrate the additional functionality and versatility of gollum and at the same time constitute a set of new results for the transport properties of selected structures . all of the functionalities that will be discussed below are available either in the current public version of the code , or in the current development version , that will be made public in the autumn of 2014 . the layout of this article is as follows . in section ii , we describe the theoretical approach behind the program and outline the theoretical and practical details of the current implementation . the section starts with a detailed description of the generic two - probe and multi - probe junction setups available within gollum and introduces the terminology that will be used throughout the article . this is followed by subsections describing the determination of the surface green s function of each current - carrying lead and the full scattering matrix . we then introduce a convenient method that allows us to describe finite - voltage non - equilibrium effects . a subsection explaining the concept of virtual leads enables us to describe hybrid structures containing non - collinear magnetism or superconductivity within the scattering region . two additional subsections explain two facilities included in gollum that enable us to describe electronic correlation effects beyond dft , including coulomb blockade and kondo physics . we then show how to include a gauge field in the gollum hamiltonian . a final subsection explains the multi - scale methodology used to describe large - scale junctions and environmental effects , using a combination of classical molecular dynamics for the environment and quantum transport for the central scattering region . in section iii , we present the details and results of the simulations of a series of sixteen different demonstrator systems . the purpose of each demonstrator is to present one or more of the functionalities of gollum . we start with a few model junctions , described by tight - binding hamiltonians , which show basic capabilities and demonstrate how easily and flexibly the program can analyze non - trivial physical effects . these include two and four - terminal normal - metal junctions , a two - dimensional system showing the quantum hall effect , and two hybrid structures , the first containing two superconducting islands sandwiched by two normal metal electrodes , and the second containing a non - collinear spin structure . there follow a series of dft - based calculations , that describe spin - active junctions ; graphene junctions , where the use of van der waals functionals is crucial and junctions enclosing metallo - organic molecules , where a treatment of strong - correlations beyond dft is mandatory . these are handled using three different approaches . in the first , the properties of metalloporphyrin junctions are described using the lda+u methodology ; in the second , the lda spectrum of an ope derivative is adjusted to improve the agreement with experimental data ; in the third , we describe coulomb blockade and kondo features of model or simple gold junctions . the next demonstrator shows how gollum can compute the thermoelectric transport properties of a junction.this is followed by a discussion of the transport properties of a carbon - nanotube - based four - probe junction . the next three examples require the use of multi - scale techniques , where we use a three - step methodology described later in the article . the first demonstrator describes how liquid environmental effects modify the transport properties of a single - molecule junction . the second example demonstrates that single strands of dna can be trans - located though graphene nanopores , where the strands effectively gate the nanopore structure yielding a highly sensitive dna sensor based on field - effect - transistor concepts . a final demonstrator shows how gollum can compute full sequences of pulling and pushing cycles in single - molecule junctions resembling the opening and closing cycles of mechanically controllable break junction ( mcbj ) experiments , enabling the construction of theoretical conductance histograms . the final demonstrator shows how gollum has access to the phase of the full scattering matrix , and describes non - trivial quantum pumping effects related to the phase evolution of the scattered wave function . a concluding section summarizes the features delivered by the program and an appendix illustrates our method to decimate hamiltonians and overlap matrices . gollum describes open systems comprising an extended scattering region ( colored dark blue in figs . 1 and 2 ) connected to external crystalline leads ( colored light blue in figs . 1 and 2 ) . depending on the problem of interest and the language used to describe the system , the material ( m ) of interest forming the central part of the scattering region could comprise a single molecule , a quantum dot , a mesoscopic cavity , a carbon nanotube , a two - dimensional mono- or multi - layered material , a magneto - resistive element or a region containing one or more superconductors . figure 1 shows an example of a 4-lead system whose central scattering region ( generically labelled m throughout the paper ) is a molecule . it is important to note that in an accurate ab initio description of such a structure , the properties of the leads closest to the molecule ( or more generally the central scattering material ) will be modified by the presence of the central scattering region ( m ) and by the fact that the leads terminate . in what follows , we refer to those affected portions of the leads closest to the central scatterer as branches and include them as part of the extended scatterer ( denoted em throughout this article ) . consequently within gollum , a typical structure consists of an extended scatterer ( em ) , formed from both the central scatterer ( m ) and the branches . the extended scattering region is connected to crystalline current - carrying leads of constant cross - section , shown in light blue in the figs . 1 and 2 . for an accurate description of a given system , the branches are chosen to be long enough such that they join smoothly with the ( light blue ) crystalline leads . crucially , the properties of this interface region between the central scatterer m and the leads are determined by their mutual interaction and are not properties of either m or the electrodes alone . , where @xmath1 is an applied bias . ( bottom ) each lead is composed of an infinite chain of identical pl with hamiltonian @xmath2 coupled with each other via coupling hamiltonians @xmath3 . the extended scattering region comprises the actual central scattering region and several pl in each branch up to the tpl . the tpl connect the em region to the leads . the central scattering region consists in this example of the electrodes surfaces and a molecule . ] 2 shows a two - terminal device in more detail and introduces further terminology to be used throughout the paper . the regions in light blue are called electrodes or leads and are described by perfect periodic hamiltonians subject to chosen chemical potentials . each lead @xmath4 is formed by a semi - infinite series of identical layers of constant cross section , which we refer to as principal layers ( pls ) . 2 shows only two pls per lead ( colored white ) , although an infinite number is implied . furthermore in the figure , the leads are identical and therefore the lead index @xmath4 has been dropped . these pls are described mathematically by intra - layer hamiltonians @xmath5 . pls must be chosen so that they are coupled only to their nearest neighbors by the hamiltonians @xmath6 , which means that in the presence of long - range couplings , a pl may contain more than one longitudinal unit cell of the lead . then , if each pl contains @xmath7 orbitals , then @xmath5 and @xmath6 are square @xmath8 matrices . the extended scatterer ( em ) in dark blue is composed of a central scattering region ( m ) and branches . each branch contain several pls . these pls have an identical atomic arrangement as the pls in the leads . however , their hamiltonians differ from @xmath5 and @xmath6 due to the presence of the central scattering region . pl numbering at each branch starts at the pl beside the central scattering region . the outermost pl at each branch of the em region is called the terminating principal layer ( tpl ) and must be described by hamiltonians @xmath9 and @xmath10 which are close enough to @xmath5 and @xmath6 , to match smoothly with the corresponding lead hamiltonian . for this reason , gollum requires that the em contain at the very least one pl . the central scatterer ( m ) itself is described by an intra - scatterer hamiltonian @xmath11 and coupling matrices to the closest pls of the branches . in the example in fig . 2 , the central scattering region m comprises a molecule and the atoms forming the electrode surfaces . the surfaces in gollum include all atoms belonging to the electrodes whose atomic arrangements can not be cast exactly as a pl , due to surface reconstructions , etc . for simplicity , fig . 2 shows the case of a symmetric system , although no such symmetries are imposed by gollum . all hamiltonians are spin- dependent , but again for notational simplicity , the spin index @xmath12 will not be written explicitly here . this means that the hamiltonian @xmath13 for a given lead @xmath4 can be written as the semi - infinite matrix : @xmath14 when using a non - orthogonal basis set , overlap matrices must be defined with the same structure as the hamiltonian matrices : @xmath15 and @xmath16 . it is convenient to introduce the notation @xmath17 for notational simplicity , from now we will consider the case where all leads are equal so that the super - index @xmath4 can be omitted , although gollum imposes no such restrictions . the program can assume either open or periodic boundary conditions in the plane perpendicular to the transport direction . in this last case , unit cells are chosen in the plane perpendicular to the transport direction and the hamiltonians and overlap matrices acquire a specific dependence on the transverse k - vector , @xmath18 , @xmath19 where @xmath20 and @xmath21 label the @xmath22 orbitals in the unit cell ( ie pl ) at the origin of @xmath23 , while @xmath24 denote orbitals equivalent to @xmath21 , but placed in adjacent unit cells located at transverse positions @xmath23 . for @xmath25 , @xmath20 and @xmath21 must belong to the same pl @xmath26 , while for @xmath27 , @xmath24 must belong to the pl @xmath28 . finally @xmath23 are vectors in the two - dimensional bravais lattice , joining the unit cell taken as origin with its neighboring unit cells . to illustrate how an em is connected to leads , we now consider the 4-lead example of fig.1 , where we assume that the tpl is the third pl in each branch . to describe such a multi - terminal setup , the hamiltonian matrix @xmath29 of the em is arranged in a non - conventional way . the first matrix block corresponds to the central scattering region @xmath30 , the second matrix block corresponds to the pls in the em branch connecting to lead 1 , the third matrix block to the pls in the em branch connecting to lead 2 , and so on . @xmath31 finally , the em described by @xmath29 and the leads described by @xmath32 are coupled via matrices @xmath33 to yield a four - terminal junction described by the infinite matrix : @xmath34 where , @xmath35 couple @xmath29 and for example , @xmath36 this arrangement of the hamiltonian enables the straightforward generalization of the approach to an arbitrary number of leads . the transport properties of the junction are encapsulated in its scattering matrix @xmath37 , which can be obtained by computing the green s function of the whole junction @xmath38 by solving the infinite system of equations @xmath39 this equation can be simplified by replacing the semi - infinite lead greens functions @xmath40 by their surface green s functions @xmath41 , whose dimensions are @xmath42 . the remaining system of equations takes the form @xmath43 where the coupling hamiltonians are now @xmath44 and the surface green s functions of the isolated leads @xmath45 can be obtained as described in section ii.a.3 below . the equation for the full green s function can be written in a more compact form as @xmath46 the scattering matrix can be computed using the green s functions matrix elements @xmath47 connecting the different leads , which can be obtained by inverting only the upper matrix box in eq . ( [ gf ] ) @xmath48 in contrast , access to the local electronic and current densities at the em region is obtained from @xmath49 the above expressions for the hamiltonians are very general . any appropriate tight - binding hamiltonian could be introduced by hand to allow computation of the transport properties of a parametrized model . alternatively , any dft code using localized basis sets can provide them . in this case the dft program produces the hamiltonians and fermi energy of the em region @xmath50 , @xmath51 and @xmath52 , and of each lead @xmath53 , @xmath15 and @xmath54 in separate runs . gollum has an interface to the latest versions of the dft program siesta ( siesta 3.1 , siesta vdw and siesta lda+u ) and of fireball and more interfaces will be developed in the future . spin degrees of freedom in spin - active systems are handled as follows : if the spins are all collinear , then we compute separate hamiltonians and perform separate transport calculations for the spin - up and -down degrees of freedom . however , if the junction has non - collinear spins or is subject to spin - orbit interactions@xcite , then the spin - up and down - degrees of freedom are regarded as two distinct sets of orbitals in the hamiltonian , whose distinct labels allow the computation of spin - currents or magneto - resistive behaviors . ( color online ) infinite system used to generate the leads hamiltonians @xmath55 and @xmath56 . a positive direction is defined to be towards the scatterer . ] each of the lead green s functions @xmath45 is determined following the procedures described in refs . [ ] with some minor modifications . to do so , we start by associating to each semi - infinite lead @xmath4 a periodic infinite system , whose unit cell contains a single pl , as sketched in fig . ( [ fig : lead - generation ] ) . @xmath55 and @xmath56 can then be created for this infinite system by hand as model hamiltonians , or can be generated by a dft program in a dedicated simulation . notice that we will drop the @xmath4 super - index until the end of the section for simplicity . by expanding the bloch eigenstates of the infinite system in a localized basis set @xmath57 where @xmath26 , @xmath20 are indices for its unit cells and the orbitals within them , and @xmath58 is a dimensionless , longitudinal bloch wave - vector , the following secular @xmath42 equation can be deduced @xmath59 where the column vector @xmath60 contains the wave - function coefficients @xmath61 . the above equation is usually solved by choosing a wave vector @xmath58 and solving for the eigen - energies and the corresponding eigenvectors . however , in the present transport problem , we do the opposite : we choose the energy @xmath62 and solve for the allowed wave vectors and corresponding eigenstates . for a given energy @xmath62 , the above equation has @xmath63 solutions with either real or complex wave vectors @xmath64 , @xmath65 . to obtain the latter , the equation can be recast as @xmath66 where @xmath67 and @xmath68 are the @xmath42 identity and zero matrices , @xmath69 and @xmath70 is a n - component column vector . gollum solves equation ( [ gep ] ) as it is superior in numerical terms to equation ( [ gep1 ] ) . we compute the group velocities of the states corresponding to real wave vectors as @xmath71 note that @xmath72 has units of energy and therefore the real , fully - dimensioned group velocity is @xmath73 , where @xmath74 is the spacing between neighboring pls in a given lead . we now divide the @xmath63 wave vectors obtained from eq . ( [ gep ] ) into two sets , each containing n values.the first set denoted \{@xmath64 } are real ( complex ) wave vectors that have @xmath75 ( @xmath76 ) and therefore propagate propagate ( decay ) to the right of the figure . they are consequently called positive open ( closed ) channels . the second set denoted \{@xmath77 } are real ( complex ) wave - vectors that have @xmath78 ( @xmath79 ) propagate ( decay ) to the left of the figure . they are called negative open ( closed ) channels . we introduce the dual vectors @xmath80 , @xmath81 , which satisfy @xmath82 and @xmath83 . these can be found by inverting the @xmath42 matrices @xmath84 the above eigenvectors can be used to construct the following transfer matrices @xmath85 these transfer matrices allow us to build the coupling matrix @xmath1 , the self - energies @xmath86 , and the surface green s functions @xmath45 : @xmath87 the procedure described above to compute the lead green s functions can fail , because of the singular behavior of the hamiltonians matrices @xmath27 , which lead to numerical inaccuracies in the solution of eq . ( [ gep ] ) , and is usually manifested in the program producing a number of positive and negative channels different from @xmath22 . notice that if the number of positive and negative channels is different from @xmath22 , then the dual vectors can not be found by inverting @xmath88 and @xmath89 . there exist several schemes to regularize @xmath27 , based on decimating out the offending degrees of freedom . these procedures are explained in detail in refs . [ ] . gollum uses a suitable adaptation of these methods , which is described in the appendix . ( color online ) infinite system whose unit cell is the em region . this is linked to neighboring em cells by periodic boundary conditions . ] ( color online ) super cell containing the extended scattering region em . the em region is surrounded by buffer vacuum regions to its left and right . ] as noted above , @xmath90 can be provided as a model hamiltonian , or generated by a dft or other material - specific program . one of the strengths of gollum is an ability to treat interfaces with high accuracy . in a tight - binding description , tight - binding parameters of a particular material are often chosen by fitting to a band structure . however this does not solve the problem of choosing parameters to describe the interface between two materials . often this problem is finessed by choosing interface parameters to be a combination of pure - material parameters such as an arithmetic or geometric mean , but there is no fundamental justification for such approximations . therefore we describe here methods to generate @xmath90 using a dft program , where the inclusion of branches as part of the extended scatterer occurs naturally . ( [ fig : em1 ] ) shows an example of a junction where the electrodes are identical . the system is composed of super cells formed from a central scatterer and pls . there are periodic boundary conditions in the longitudinal direction , such that the tpl of one branch of a super - cell is linked smoothly to the tpl of a neighboring super - cell . running a dft program for such a super - cell then automatically generates @xmath90 . provided the super cells contain sufficient pls , the hamiltonians @xmath91 and @xmath92 associated with the tpls will be almost identical to those generated from a calculation involving an infinite periodic lead . if the hamiltonians @xmath25 and @xmath27 associated with the pls are generated from a calculation involving an infinite periodic lead , then provided the super cells contain sufficient pls , these will be almost identical to @xmath91 and @xmath92 respectively . in this case then there will be minimal scattering caused by the junction between the tpl and the lead . clearly there is a trade - off between accuracy and cpu time , because inserting more pls increases the size and cost of the calculation . in practice , the number of pls retained in such a super - cell is increased in stages until the results do not change significantly as the number of pls is increased further . there exist situations where the electrodes are dissimilar , either chemically , or because of their different crystalline structure , or because their magnetic moments are not aligned . in these cases , there can not be a smooth matching between tpls of neighboring super cells in fig . 4 . to address this situation , we use a setup similar to that displayed in fig . ( [ fig : em2 ] ) , where additional pls are appended to the branches in the em region . these additional pls are terminated by artificial surfaces and surrounded by vacuum . the tpls are then chosen to be one of the pls near the middle of each branch and should be surrounded by enough pls both towards its artificial surface and towards the central scattering region . then the pls placed between the tpl and the artificial surface are discarded . these sacrificial pls ensure that the chosen tpl is unaffected by the presence of the artificial vacuum boundary . clearly , calculations of this sort are more expensive in numerical terms than those performed with super cells generated as in fig . ( [ fig : em1 ] ) , because they contain many more atoms . in an ab initio calculation of the transport properties of a junction , the dft program produces the hamiltonians and fermi energy of the em region @xmath50 , @xmath51 and @xmath93 , and of each lead @xmath53 , @xmath15 and @xmath54 in separate runs . notice that the hartree potential is defined up to a constant , which is usually different for the em and for each lead this usually means that the energy origin of the em and of the corresponding lead pls , as well as their fermi energies do not agree with each other , so eq . ( 2 ) must be rewritten as follows : @xmath94 where we have referred the energy of each lead to its own fermi energy . to fix the hamiltonian mismatch we define a realignment variable for each lead as follows : @xmath95 where @xmath20 indicates a relevant orbital or group of orbitals . then , the hamiltonian of each lead is realigned with that of the em @xmath96 it turns out that the renormalized @xmath97 and bare @xmath54 fermi energies of each lead do not match perfectly with each other if the number of pls in the em region is not sufficiently large . this is the case when for efficiency reasons , it is desirable to artificially minimize the size of the em . sometimes it is advisable to choose the fermi energy of one of the leads @xmath98 as the reference energy . in this case , a second overall shift can be performed using either @xmath99 or the quantity @xmath100 . we note that the most general scattering state in a given lead @xmath4 at a given energy @xmath62 can be written as a linear combination of open and closed channels as follows @xmath101 where @xmath102 and @xmath103 denote here open positive and negative channels and @xmath104 and @xmath105 are their normalized kets . here , the contribution of all the closed channels in lead @xmath4 is described by the ket @xmath106 . consequently , the number of electrons per unit time flowing between two adjacent pls within the lead is @xmath107 we pick in this section the convention that positive direction in the lead means flow towards the em region and vice versa . so positive ( negative ) open channels are also called incoming ( outgoing ) channels of lead @xmath4 . with this notation . the wave - function coefficients of the incoming open channels of a given lead are determined by the properties of the reservoir connected to the lead . the wave function coefficients of the open outgoing channels of lead @xmath4 are obtained from the amplitudes of all incoming channels by @xmath108 where @xmath103 ( @xmath109 ) is an outgoing ( incoming ) dimensionless wave - vector of lead @xmath4 ( @xmath110 ) . it is therefore convenient to assemble the wave - functions of the @xmath111 outgoing and @xmath111 incoming open channels of a given lead @xmath4 in the column vectors @xmath112 , @xmath113 , and all the scattering matrix elements connecting leads @xmath4 and @xmath110 into the matrix block @xmath114 . notice that the dimensions of @xmath114 are @xmath115 . then the above equation can be written more compactly as @xmath116 by normalizing the bloch eigenvectors @xmath60 , @xmath117 and their duals to unit flux , @xmath118 the matrix elements of the scattering matrix block connecting leads @xmath4 and @xmath110 can be written as . @xmath119 here @xmath120 is the off - diagonal block of the surface green s function defined in eqs . ( 11 ) and ( 12 ) , that connects leads @xmath4 and @xmath110 and @xmath121 is the matrix defined in eq . ( 20 ) . with the above notation , if the incoming channel @xmath102 of lead @xmath4 is occupied with probability @xmath122 ( ie if in eq . ( [ ok ] ) , @xmath123 with probability @xmath122 ) then the number of electrons per unit time , entering the scattering region from reservoir @xmath4 along channel @xmath102 with energy between @xmath62 and @xmath124 is @xmath125 and the number per unit time , per unit energy leaving the scatterer and entering reservoir @xmath4 along channel @xmath126 with energy between @xmath62 and @xmath124 is @xmath127 in many cases , the incoming and outgoing channels of each lead @xmath4 can be grouped into channels possessing particular attributes ( ie quantum numbers ) labeled @xmath128 etc . this occurs when all incoming channels of a particular type @xmath129 in lead @xmath4 possess the same occupation probability @xmath130 . for example , all quasi - particles of type @xmath129 in reservoir @xmath4 may possess a common chemical potential @xmath131 and @xmath132 may take the form @xmath133 , where @xmath134 is the fermi function . in this case , if the incoming and outgoing channels of type @xmath129 belonging to lead @xmath4 possess wave - vectors @xmath135 , @xmath136 , then the number of quasi - particles per unit time of type @xmath129 leaving reservoir @xmath4 with energy between @xmath62 and @xmath124 is @xmath137 where @xmath138 and @xmath139 is the number of open incoming channels of type @xmath140 , energy @xmath62 in lead @xmath4 . note that in the above summation , @xmath141 runs over all outgoing wave - vectors of energy @xmath62 and type @xmath129 of lead @xmath4 and @xmath142 runs over all incoming wave - vectors of energy @xmath62 and type @xmath143 in lead @xmath110 . if @xmath4 and @xmath110 are different leads , then @xmath144 is often called the transmission amplitude and denoted @xmath145 , while if they are the same lead , then @xmath146 is called the reflection amplitude @xmath147 . similarly , for @xmath148 , it is common to define the transmission coefficient @xmath149 as @xmath150 and for @xmath151 , we define the reflection coefficient as @xmath152 so that @xmath153f^i_{\beta_i}(e ) \nonumber \\ & - & \sum _ { { j\ne i},{\beta_j}}t^{i , j}_{\alpha_i,\beta_j } f^j_{\beta_j}(e)\}\label{x1}\end{aligned}\ ] ] note that unitarity of the scattering matrix requires @xmath154 hence the sum of the elements of each row and column of the matrix @xmath155 is zero : @xmath156 or equivalently , @xmath157 and @xmath158 from eqs . ( [ x1 ] ) and ( [ x3 ] ) , if @xmath159 is independent of @xmath110 and @xmath143 then @xmath160 for all @xmath4 and @xmath129 , as expected . for this reason , in the above equations , @xmath159 can be replaced by @xmath161 , where @xmath134 is an arbitrary function of energy , which in practice is usually chosen to be a fermi function , evaluated at a convenient reference temperature and chemical potential . when comparing theory with experiment , we are usually interested in computing the flux of some quantity @xmath88 from a particular reservoir . from eq . ( [ xxx ] ) , if the amount of @xmath88 carried by quasi - particles of type @xmath129 is @xmath162 , then the flux of @xmath88 from reservoir @xmath4 is @xmath163 in the simplest case of a normal conductor , choosing @xmath164 , independent of @xmath129 , the above equation yields the electrical current from lead @xmath4 . within gollum @xmath129 may represent spin and in the presence of superconductivity may represent hole ( @xmath165 ) or particle ( @xmath166 ) degrees of freedom . in the latter case , the charge @xmath167 carried by particles is -e , whereas the charge @xmath168 carried by holes is + e. gollum starts from a mean - field hamiltonian provided either by the user or by an outside material - specific dft code . it then computes the scattering matrix and its related transport properties . when finite voltages are applied to the electrodes , they change the distribution of incoming and outgoing electrons and therefore the underlying hamiltonian . for example , a finite voltage in a two - terminal device may introduce an electrostatic potential , which should be included in the hamiltonian . a key feature of many negf codes including smeagol is that such effects can be treated self - consistently , albeit at the cost of a greatly increased computing overhead . to avoid this overhead , gollum assumes that the user is able to provide a modified hamiltonian at finite voltages . based on our experience on the development and usage of negf programs and as demonstrated in in section iii.j below , we have found that in many cases , the following intuitive modification of the initial zero - voltage hamiltonian yields reasonable - accurate voltage - dependent transmission coefficients @xmath169 connecting leads @xmath4 and @xmath110 . the scheme enables the simulation of non - trivial @xmath170 curves which compare favorably to those obtained using negf techniques and enables the modeling of generic non - equilibrium transport phenomena such as negative differential resistance ( ndr ) and current rectification in close agreement with negf codes@xcite . consider the case where each lead has a different voltage @xmath121 . then the finite - voltage hamiltonian takes the form @xmath171 we find that @xmath29 needs only be computed at zero voltage in most cases ; the effect of a finite bias can be accounted for by a suitable re - alignment of the energies of the orbitals in the em region with the shifted energy levels of the electrodes . mathematically , we apply a simple shift to the hamiltonian matrix elements at each orbital @xmath26 in the em region @xmath172 where these local shifts @xmath173 depend on the junction electrostatics , which in many cases are known . for example , in the case of a highly - transparent junction , the shifts can be modeled by a linear voltage ramp connecting the matrix elements of the orbitals at the tpls of the em region . in contrast , when the central scattering region hamiltonian @xmath174 is connected to the pl hamiltonians @xmath175 in each branch of the em region by weaker links @xmath176 , the voltage drop and therefore the resistance is concentrated at these spots . in this case , we take @xmath177 for all orbitals in branch @xmath4 , starting at the tpl and up to the linker atoms , and @xmath178 for all the orbitals inside the m region itself . this scheme performs specially well for systems where the states around the fermi level ( homo or lumo ) are localized at or close to the contact atoms . it enables us to mimic accurately junctions displaying non - trivial negative differential resistance , as well as rectification effects for asymmetric molecules@xcite . what is the difference between a lead and a channel ? from a mathematical viewpoint , channels connect an extended scattering region to a reservoir and the role of lead @xmath4 is simply to label those channels @xmath179 , which connect to a particular reservoir @xmath4 . conceptually , this means that from the point of view of solving a scattering problem at energy @xmath62 , a single lead with @xmath180 incoming channels can be regarded as @xmath180 virtual leads , each with a single channel . gollum takes advantage of this equivalence by regarding the above groups of channels with wave - vectors @xmath181 as virtual leads and treating them on the same footing as physical leads . from this viewpoint , ( [ xxx ] ) and ( [ x1 ] ) yield the number of quasi - particles per unit time `` from virtual lead @xmath129 '' entering the scattering region with energy between @xmath62 and @xmath124 . this viewpoint is particularly useful when the hamiltonians @xmath182 , @xmath183 describing the pls of the physical lead @xmath4 are block diagonal with respect to the quantum numbers associated with @xmath181 . for example , this occurs when the leads possess a uniform magnetization , in which case the lead hamiltonian is block diagonal with respect to the local magnetization axis of the lead and @xmath140 represents the spin degree of freedom @xmath12 . this occurs also when the leads are normal metals , but the scattering region contains one or more superconductors , in which case the lead hamiltonian is block diagonal with respect to particle and hole degrees of freedom and @xmath140 represents either particles @xmath184 or holes @xmath185 . more generally , in the presence of both magnetism and superconductivity , or combinations of singlet and triplet superconductivity , @xmath140 would represent combinations of spin and particles and holes degrees of freedom . in all of these cases , @xmath182 , @xmath183 are block diagonal and it is convenient to identify virtual leads @xmath129 with each block , because gollum will compute the channels @xmath181 belonging to each block in separate calculations and therefore guarantees that all such channels can be separately identified . this is advantageous , because if all channels of @xmath182 , @xmath183 were calculated simultaneously , then in the case of degeneracies , arbitrary superpositions of channels with different quantum numbers could result and therefore it would be necessary to implement a separate unitary transformation to sort channels into the chosen quantum numbers . by treating each block as a virtual lead , this problem is avoided . examples of this approach are presented below , when describing the scattering properties of magnetic or normal - superconducting - normal systems . in the presence of non - collinear magnetic moments , provided the lead hamiltonians are block diagonal in spin indices ( in general relative to lead - dependent magnetization axes ) choosing @xmath186 and @xmath164 in eq . ( [ xxxx ] ) yields for the total electrical current @xmath187 note that in general it is necessary to retain the subscripts @xmath188 associated with @xmath189 or @xmath190 , because the leads may possess different magnetic axes . similarly the thermal energy from reservoir @xmath4 per unit time is @xmath191 for the special case of a normal multi - terminal junction having collinear magnetic moments , @xmath192 for all @xmath4 and since there is no spin - flip scattering , @xmath193 . in this case , the total hamiltonian of the whole system is block diagonal in spin indices and the scattering matrix can be obtained from separate calculations for each spin . we assume that initially the junction is in thermodynamic equilibrium , so that all reservoirs possess the same chemical potential @xmath194 . subsequently . we apply to each reservoir @xmath4 a different voltage @xmath195 , so that its chemical potential is @xmath196 . then from equation ( [ xxx ] ) , the charge per unit time per spin entering the scatterer from each lead can be written as @xmath197 and the thermal energy per spin per unit time is @xmath198 where @xmath199 and @xmath200 is the deviation in fermi distribution of lead @xmath4 from the reference distribution @xmath201 . in the limit of small potential differences or small differences in reservoir temperatures , the deviations in the distributions from the reference distribution @xmath202 can be approximated by differentials and therefore to evaluate currents , in the presence of collinear magnetism , gollum provides the following spin - dependent integrals @xmath203 in the presence of two leads labeled @xmath204 , the spin - dependent low - voltage electrical conductance @xmath205 , the thermopower ( seebeck coefficient ) @xmath206 , the peltier coefficient @xmath207 and the thermal conductance @xmath208 can be obtained as @xmath209 so that the equivalent spin - summed magnitudes are @xmath210 note that the thermal conductance is guaranteed to be positive , because the expectation value of the square of a variable is greater than or equal to the square of the expectation value . for a two - terminal system , the above expressions allow us to obtain the electronic contribution to the thermoelectric figure of merit@xcite : @xmath211 a phenomenological scheme that improves the agreement between theoretical simulations and experiments in , for example , single - molecule electronics consists of shifting the occupied and unoccupied levels of the m region downwards and upwards respectively to increase the energy gap@xcite of the m region . the procedure is conveniently called spectral adjustment in nanoscale transport ( saint ) . at the request of a user , gollum modifies the hamiltonian operator of the m region as follows : @xmath212 where @xmath213 are energy shifts and ( @xmath214 , @xmath215 ) denote the occupied and unoccupied states , respectively . by using the definition of the density matrix operator of the m region @xmath216 the above hamiltonian can be rewritten as @xmath217 the equation can also be written in matrix form as @xmath218 to find the density matrix , we first solve the generalized eigenvalue problem : @xmath219 where @xmath220 is the @xmath221 identity matrix , and we have arranged the eigen - energies @xmath222 into a diagonal matrix @xmath223 . then @xmath224 in the simplest case , for a single - molecule junction , the shifts @xmath225 are chosen to align the highest occupied and lowest unoccupied molecular orbitals ( ie the homo and lumo ) with ( minus ) the ionization potential ( ip ) and electron affinity ( ea ) of the isolated molecule @xmath226 however the coulomb interactions in the isolated molecule are screened if the molecule is placed in close proximity to the metallic electrodes . currently , gollum takes this effect by using a simple image charge model@xcite , where the molecule is replaced by a point charge located at the middle point of the molecule and where the image planes are placed 1 above the electrodes surfaces . then the shifts are corrected by screening effects as follows : @xmath227 where @xmath74 is the distance between the image plane and the point image charge . many nanoscale - scale junctions are expected to show coulomb blockade behavior , and in specific situations also kondo features @xcite . these features can be demonstrated by gating the junction , and should appear as coulomb and kondo diamond lines in contour density plots of the low - voltage conductance as a function of bias and gate voltages . these strong correlation effects are completely missing in conventional dft . accurate parametrizations of the ground - state energy density functional of the single - channel anderson model exist that allow a correct description of those phenomena@xcite . however , most nanojunctions are better modeled in terms of a multi - channel anderson model as we have chosen to do in gollum . this model is described by the hamiltonian @xmath228 where the hamiltonian at the central scattering region is given by @xmath229 here the @xmath230-sum runs over the @xmath231 correlated degrees of freedom and includes the spin index , @xmath232 denote the on - site energies and @xmath233 is the electronic coulomb repulsion , that is assumed to be the same for all degrees of freedom . we map the central scattering region hamiltonian @xmath30 in eq . ( 4 ) into @xmath234 to extract the self - energies @xmath235 of the correlated degrees of freedom , in the spirit of dynamical mean field theory@xcite . following ref . ( ) , our correlated degrees of freedom are a subset of the eigenstates of @xmath30 , that we will call here molecular orbitals . this contrast with the approach followed in ref . ( ) where the correlated degrees of freedom where taken to be atomic orbitals of transition metal atoms . for a four - lead device , the details of our implementation are as follows . we take the em hamiltonian @xmath236 where @xmath174 has dimensions @xmath237 and therefore describes @xmath155 molecular orbitals . we first solve the generalized eigenvalue problem at the m region as in eqs . ( 54 - 57 ) in the previous section to find the rotation matrix @xmath238 that diagonalizes @xmath174 : @xmath239 where @xmath240 is the @xmath221 identity matrix . we then perform the direct product @xmath241 to enlarge the size of the matrix @xmath238 to the dimensions of the em hamiltonian matrix . we then rotate the em hamiltonian and compute the green s function of the em region @xmath242 we now choose which molecular orbitals @xmath243 with associated on - site energies @xmath244 are the correlated degrees of freedom , and use the projectors @xmath245 to find their projected green s functions and occupancies @xmath246\,f(e_f)\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath247 is the em fermi level . we then shift the on - site energy of the correlated orbitals by the conventional double counting term@xcite @xmath248 as a consequence , we have to recompute again the green s functions @xmath249 this is cast in the form @xmath250 which allows us to extract the hybridization function @xmath251 . the initial ingredients in the solution of the multichannel anderson model are the set @xmath252 . they allow us to extract the self - energies @xmath253 using a impurity solver . these are added again to the on - site energies @xmath254 leading to a new em hamiltonian @xmath29 and associated green s function @xmath255 . from here we compute a new hybridization function @xmath256 with which new self - energies @xmath257 are determined . the cycle is repeated until self - consistency in @xmath258 and @xmath257 is achieved . the resulting @xmath29 is inserted back into eq . ( 12 ) and the surface green - function matrix @xmath259 is computed to extract the transport properties of the correlated junction . we have decided to include in gollum a finite-@xmath233 impurity solver . this way , we can subtract the double - counting terms and place the molecular orbitals at their correct bare energy positions by using eq . ( [ eq : double_counting ] ) . there exist a variety of finite-@xmath233 impurity solvers based on perturbation expansions on the coulomb interaction @xmath233 , on the hybridization function @xmath251 , on interpolative approaches , on monte - carlo algorithms ( see ref . ( ) for a detailed account of some of these solvers ) , or on numerical renormalization group techniques@xcite ( nrg ) . nrg techniques have superior accuracy , but they bring high computational demands . slave - boson - based expansions on @xmath251 like the oca@xcite are rather accurate and less expensive numerically . the impurity solver used in gollum is based on the interpolative perturbation theory approach@xcite , where the second - order in @xmath233 expression for the electron self - energy is interpolated to match the atomic self - energy , and adjusted to satisfy consistency equations for the high - energy moments together with luttinger s theorem . this approach is computationally very simple , but has been proven to provide reasonable results for the multi - channel finite-@xmath233 anderson model@xcite . its main shortcoming is that it overestimates the kondo temperature , as we discuss in section ( [ section_kondo ] ) . specifically , the impurity solver that we have implemented to handle the multi - channel hamiltonian ( [ eq : anderson - hamiltonian ] ) is described in ref . ( ) , although we have corrected errors in some of the equations in that reference . we note that this impurity solver handles @xmath260 spin - degenerate correlated degrees of freedom , so that @xmath231 must be an even number . in other words , these channels must come as kramers pairs . we stress that other impurity solvers can be implemented straightforwardly , due to the modular nature of gollum . to compute transport properties in the presence of a magnetic field gollum allows the user to introduce a peierls substitution by changing the phase factors of the coupling elements@xcite between atomic orbitals . for example in the case of a nearest - neighbor tight - binding hamiltonian , the inter- site matrix element @xmath261 between site i and site j is replaced with the modified element , @xmath262 where @xmath263 and @xmath264 are the positions of site i and j and @xmath265 is the vector potential . the gauge is chosen such that the principal layers of the leads remain translational invariant after the substitution . as an example , below we demonstrate how gollum describes the quantum hall effect in a disordered square lattice , with a perpendicular uniform magnetic field . and @xmath266 connected to a superconductor ] figure [ fig : superconductor](a ) shows a two - probe normal - superconductor - normal ( n - s - n ) device with left and right normal reservoirs connected to a scattering region containing one or more superconductors . if the complete hamiltonian describing a normal system of the type shown in fig . 2 is @xmath267 , then in the presence of superconductivity within the extended scattering region , the new system is described by the bogoliubov - de gennes hamiltonian @xmath268 where the elements of the matrix @xmath269 are non - zero only in the region occupied by a superconductor , as indicated in figure [ fig : superconductor](b ) . physically , @xmath267 describes particle degrees of freedom , @xmath270 describes hole degrees of freedom and @xmath269 is the superconducting order parameter . the multi - channel scattering theory for such a normal - superconducting - normal ( n - s - n ) structure was first derived by lambert in ref . [ ] , where the following current - voltage relation was presented : @xmath271 where @xmath272 ( @xmath273 ) is the current from the left ( right ) reservoir , @xmath274 ( @xmath275 ) is the difference between the chemical potential of the left ( right ) reservoir and the chemical potential @xmath20 of the superconducting condensate and the voltage difference between the left and right reservoirs is @xmath276 . this expression is the low - voltage limit of more general current - voltage relations discussed in [ ] . the generalization to multi - probe structures is described in refs . , to thermoelectric properties of superconducting nanostructures in refs . [ ] and to ferromagnetic - superconducting structures in refs . [ ] . in this equation , @xmath277 where @xmath278 ( @xmath279 ) is the number of open channels in the left ( right ) lead , @xmath280 ( @xmath281 ) are normal ( andreev ) reflection and transmission coefficients for quasi - particles emitted from the right lead , @xmath282 ( @xmath283 ) are normal ( andreev ) reflection and transmission coefficients from the left lead and all quantities are evaluated at the fermi energy @xmath284 . as a consequence of unitarity of the scattering matrix , these satisfy @xmath285 and @xmath286 . the current - voltage relation of equ . ( [ x7 ] ) is fundamentally different from that encountered for normal systems , because unitarity of the s - matrix does not imply that the sum of each row or column of the matrix @xmath74 is zero . consequently , the currents do not automatically depend solely of the applied voltage difference @xmath276 ( or more generally on the differences between incoming quasi - article distributions ) . in practice such a dependence arises only after the chemical potential of the superconductor adjusts itself self - consistently to ensure that the current from the left reservoir is equal to the current entering the right reservoir . insisting that @xmath287 , then yields @xmath288 and therefore the two - probe conductance @xmath289 takes the form of @xmath290 the above equation demonstrates why a superconductor possesses zero resistivity , because if the superconductor is disordered , then as the length @xmath291 of the superconductor increases , all transmission coefficients will vanish . in this limit , the above equation reduces to @xmath292 . in contrast with a normal scatterer , this shows that in the presence of andreev scattering , as @xmath291 tends to infinity , the resistance ( = 1/conductance ) remains finite and therefore the resistivity ( ie resistance per unit length ) vanishes . in the notation of eqs . ( [ xxx ] ) and ( [ x1 ] ) , the above current - voltage relations and their finite - temperature , finite voltage generalizations can be obtained from eq . ( [ xxxx ] ) by writing @xmath293 or @xmath294 to yield @xmath295 since @xmath296 and @xmath297 , this becomes @xmath298 \bar f^j_{\beta_j}(e ) \label{x6}\ ] ] since , in the low - bias limit , @xmath299 , where @xmath134 is the fermi distribution with chemical potential @xmath20 , this simplifies to @xmath300 where @xmath301 \label{x77}\ ] ] the total current is obtained by multiplying eq . ( [ x6 ] ) by a factor of 2 to account for spin . on the other hand , in the limit of zero temperature , @xmath302 hence in this limit , the current - voltage relation ( [ x6 ] ) reduces to eq . ( [ x7 ] ) . simulation of the transport properties of a nanoscale - scale junction involves three distinct tasks . first , model geometries must be generated . secondly , the hamiltonian for each geometry must be constructed . thirdly , the s - matrix can be calculated and transport properties of the junction calculated . gollum separates these three tasks into three different processes . an overview of the work - flow of a generic gollum calculation is shown in figure [ multiscale ] . the three consecutive stages of the work process are denoted by the three dotted rectangular boxes . the initial step consists usually of modeling the atomistic arrangement of the junction . an initial structure is usually guessed , followed by geometry optimization or molecular dynamics simulations to obtain a more realistic atomic arrangement . this task can be performed by either ab - initio or classical molecular - dynamics methods . for systems containing a few hundred atoms , a quantum - mechanical dft - based simulation is usually the method of choice . however , experiments are often performed under ambient conditions or in a liquid environment . in these cases that the microscopic model should include the atomic structure of the environment , as we show below in section iii.gollum addresses this task by using classical molecular dynamics to model the environment and in the spirit of the born - oppenheimer approximation , feeding snapshots of the associated electrostatic field into the the dft - based mean - field hamiltonian . a similar approach is used to model the evolution of mechanically - controlled break junctions upon stretching , where the atomistic arrangement of the junction evolves slowly in time . in this case , if the same experiment is repeated a number of times , the junction geometry will be slightly different each time . therefore , a proper statistical analysis of the junction geometries is mandatory and calculations of the associated distribution of transmission coefficients is required . the task of generating junction geometries is also better suited for classical molecular dynamics situations . gollum also facilitates the use of combined dft and classical molecular dynamics approaches to gain accurate , yet quicker simulation results@xcite . a non - comprehensive set of software tools is listed in figure [ multiscale ] . once the atomic arrangements are generated , these are fed into the second stage , where the hamiltonian matrix is generated . this stage is in practice independent of the previous geometry construction and can be run separately , taking only the output geometries of the first stage . the junction hamiltonian can be generated using a variety of tools , some of which are listed in box ii in figure [ multiscale ] . a popular approach is the use of dft codes that are able to write the hamiltonian in a tight - binding language . in this way , model tight - binding hamiltonians can also be easily generated . other approaches involve the use of slater - booster or semi - empirical methods . in addition , gollum has the ability to modify suitably these hamiltonian matrices as discussed above . for example , the hamiltonian matrix can be modified to include scissor corrections , coulomb - blockade physics , a gate or bias voltage , a magnetic phase factor or a superconducting order parameter . finally , stage iii is the actual quantum transport calculation . this takes the hamiltonian matrix as an input and calculates the s - matrix and associated physical quantities , such the electrical or spin current , the conductance , or the thermopower . in this section , we present a diversity of calculations , which demonstrate the broad capabilities of gollum . for simplicity , we begin with a set of calculations on model hamiltonians , which demonstrate that gollum can easily handle tight - binding models for a range of physical systems . we then move on to more material - specific calculations , in which the hamiltonian is obtained from dft . these include examples exhibiting kondo physics , coulomb blockade and non - linear , finite - voltage effects . next we present more computationally challenging calculations involving van der waals interactions , environmental effects and series of geometries associated with break - junction measurements . finally an example of a quantum pump is presented , which requires access to the phase of scattering amplitudes . we define the conductance quantum @xmath303 , that will be used frequently below . , @xmath304 , @xmath305 and @xmath306 ( taken in arbitrary units ) . ] ( a ) as a function of the energy . energies are referred to the fermi energy @xmath247 and are given in units of @xmath307 . ] ( b ) that has four one - dimensional chain leads . as a function of the energy energies are referred to the fermi energy @xmath247 and are given in units of @xmath307 . ] as a first example , we consider a simple one - dimensional tight - binding chain containing a single orbital per pl and a single impurity orbital in the em region , as shown in fig [ fig:2 - 4probetb](a ) . we take the following parameters , that are given in arbitrary units . within the leads , the site energies are @xmath308 , and the nearest neighbor couplings are @xmath309 . the impurity has a site energy @xmath304 and is coupled to the leads by a hopping element @xmath310 . results are shown for @xmath305 and @xmath306 . the transmission coefficient for this chain is shown in figure [ fig:2probetb ] . as a second example , we consider the four - probe structure of fig . [ fig:2 - 4probetb](b ) , that shares the same set of parameters as the two - probe model above . the various transmission coefficients for this structure are shown in figure [ fig:2probetb4 ] . by symmetry , these are all identical . as an example of a quantum transport calculation with a magnetic field , we demonstrate the quantum hall effect within the simple tight - binding square lattice shown in the inset of fig . [ quantumhall ] . the lattice constant is set to @xmath311 . the onsite energies of the perfect lattice are @xmath312 ev , the hopping integrals at zero magnetic field are @xmath305 ev and the fermi energy is set at zero . the red area in the figure denotes a disordered portion of the lattice . in this disordered area , the onsite energies are randomly varied as @xmath313 , where @xmath314 is a random number distributed with uniform probability in the range @xmath315 , @xmath316 and @xmath317 ev ( red , green and blue dashed curves , respectively ) . the transport direction is chosen to be the @xmath318 axis ( e.g. : from bottom to top ) while the @xmath319 axis goes along the horizontal direction . to demonstrate the quantum hall effect we introduce a homogeneous magnetic field perpendicular to the square lattice , pointing out of the paper , which is expressed in units of @xmath320 tesla . with this setup the vector potential is chosen so that the lead remains translationally invariant along the @xmath318 direction . this means that we implement a peierls substitution of the form @xmath321 where @xmath322 and @xmath323 are the coordinates of the site i. with this modified hamiltonian the conductance calculated by gollum is shown in fig . ( [ quantumhall ] ) . this clearly shows the presence of quantum hall plateaus , which are resilient to the presence of disorder . conductance @xmath324 in units of @xmath325 as a function of inverse magnetic field with various level of disorder . the magnetic field unit is set to @xmath326 tesla . the inset shows the square lattice used for the calculation . the black area denotes a perfect square lattice . the red area denotes a disordered portion of the lattice , where the inter - site distances are slight modified from @xmath327 to perturb the phase contribution . the onsite energy for the regular lattice is @xmath312 ev , the coupling with zero magnetic field is @xmath305 ev and the fermi energy is chosen as zero . in the disordered area the onsite energy is randomly varied as @xmath313 , where @xmath314 is a random number distributed with uniform probability in the range @xmath315 , @xmath316 and @xmath317 ev ( red , green and blue dashed curves , respectively ) . ] and @xmath328 . the left ( right ) physical lead consists of two virtual leads @xmath329 and @xmath330 ( @xmath331 and @xmath332 ) carrying particle and hole channels respectively . ] as an example of scattering in the presence of superconductivity , we now compute the electrical conductance of the n - s - n structure shown in fig . ( [ fig : sup-1 ] ) , which contains two superconducting regions with order parameters @xmath333 and @xmath334 . such a structure is known as an andreev interferometer and was first analyzed in refs . [ ] , where it was predicted that the electrical conductance is a periodic function of the order - parameter phase difference @xmath335 , with period @xmath336 . at that time , this effect was completely missing from the more traditional quasi - classical description of superconductivity . when the missing terms were restored , good agreement between quasi - classical theory and scattering theory was obtained @xcite . in the following calculation , the hamiltonian @xmath267 of eq . ( [ super ] ) is simply a nearest neighbor tight - binding hamiltonian on a square lattice , with diagonal elements @xmath308 and nearest - neighbor couplings with @xmath305 ( in arbitrary units ) . within the regions occupied by superconductor @xmath110 , ( where @xmath337 or @xmath338 ) the top ( particle ) sites are coupled to the bottom ( hole ) sites by @xmath339 , with @xmath340 given in units of @xmath307 . for @xmath341 , figure ( [ fig : sup-2 ] ) shows the energy dependence of the andreev refection coefficient @xmath342 and the normal and andreev transmission coefficients @xmath343 and @xmath344 respectively . the green line in figure ( [ fig : sup-2 ] ) represents the number of open channels in electron ( hole ) conducting leads . as expected , the andreev reflection coefficient is large for small energies and decreases for energies above @xmath345 . substituting the values of these coefficients at @xmath346 into eq . ( [ eq : gsup ] ) and evaluating them for all @xmath335 yields the conductance versus @xmath335 plot shown in figure [ fig : sup-3 ] . as expected , the conductance is an oscillatory function of the order - parameter phase difference @xmath335 with period @xmath336 . ( dot dashed line line ) , @xmath347 ( solid blue line ) , @xmath348 ( dashed line ) and the number of open channels in the left lead for the device shown in fig . ( [ fig : sup-1 ] ) , as a function of the energy . as a function of the energy . energies are referred to the fermi energy @xmath247 and are given in units of @xmath307 . ] in units of @xmath325 , for a n - s - n structure shown in fig . ( [ fig : sup-1 ] ) as a function of the phase difference @xmath335 between the two order parameters . ] and @xmath349 the left ( right ) physical lead consists of two virtual leads @xmath350 and @xmath351 ( @xmath352 and @xmath353 ) carrying up - spin and down - spin channels respectively . ] in this section , we compute the electrical conductance of the structure shown in figure ( [ fig : mag1 ] ) , which we again describe using a simple tight - binding model of the form @xmath354 the hamiltonian @xmath267 is simply a nearest neighbor hamiltonian on a square lattice , with diagonal elements @xmath308 and nearest - neighbor couplings with @xmath305 ( in arbitrary units ) and for simplicity we choose @xmath355 everywhere . the systems consists of two magnetic islands with magnetic moments @xmath356 and @xmath349 , connected to non - magnetic leads . choosing the fermi energy to be @xmath357 , and evaluating eq . ( [ xxxx1 ] ) at zero temperature , figure ( [ fig : mag2 ] ) shows the resulting electrical conductance as a function of the angle @xmath335 between the two magnetic moments . as expected , the conductance is an oscillatory function of the magnetic angle @xmath335 . in units of @xmath325 , for the structure shown in shown in fig . ( [ fig : mag1 ] ) as a function of the angle @xmath335 between the two magnetic moments . ] having discussed model systems described by simple tight - binding hamiltonians , we now turn to more material - specific descriptions based on dft . we will use the program siesta in most of the calculations below , and will provide many of the simulation parameters to help people to reproduce our calculations . ( color online ) spin - resolved transmission coefficients as a function of energy for nickel - chain junctions . the different curves correspond to simulation with different levels of accuracy in the @xmath358 summations : ( a ) , ( b ) , ( c ) and ( d ) correspond to 1 , 4 , 16 and 64 @xmath58-points , respectively . ( 1 ) and ( 2 ) correspond to parallel and anti - parallel configurations , respectively . ] gollum can describe voltage - dependent spin - polarized transport in spin - active junctions , made from a variety of metals , including iron @xcite , platinum or palladium @xcite . to demonstrate this , we describe here the voltage - dependent spin - filtering and magneto - resistive behavior of a two - terminal junction where ( 001 ) fcc nickel electrodes with parallel ( p ) or anti - parallel ( ap ) spin orientations are connected by a nickel atomic chain@xcite . notice that because we may have electrodes with ap spin orientations , we are forced to use em setups such as those shown in fig . we sketch in fig . ( [ em_victor1 ] ) the scattering region used in the present calculation . it comprises a 6-atom - long nickel chain , the electrodes surfaces and the two branches . the electrodes surfaces contain 2/3 atomic layers with 4 atoms each . the left and right branches contain two pls that have 4 atoms each . the second pl is followed by vacuum . we have checked that the transport results in this example are reasonably converged if we choose pl1 as the tpl , which means that pl2 is sacrificial . to find the junction hamiltonian , we use the program siesta . we use the generalized gradient approximation ( gga ) functional@xcite and take the theoretical gga lattice constant of 3.45 for the pls as well as inter - atomic distances of 2.27 along the chain . we have employed a single-@xmath359 ( sz ) basis set to span the valence states and a mesh cutoff of 400 ry to define the real - space grid where the density , potential and matrix elements are calculated . ) in the ( a ) p and ( b ) ap spin configurations as a function of the bias voltage applied to the junction . the different curves correspond to different numbers of @xmath18-points . ] to understand the spin - polarized transport properties of the junction , we will analise below the spin - dependent transmission coefficients @xmath360 , together with the spin - dependent charge currents . these are computed using the approximate expression @xmath361 the above approximation is quantitatively accurate for small enough bias voltages ( @xmath362 v ) and also shows the expected qualitative behavior at larger voltages . we have found that the transmission coefficients and currents depend sensitively on the number of transverse @xmath18-points taken along the plane perpendicular to the transport direction . as we will show below , we need to use at least 16 @xmath18-points to achieve convergence . in other words , a @xmath363-point calculation provides a poor estimate of the transport properties of these junctions . we plot @xmath360 as a function of the energy referred to the fermi energy of the scattering region for p and ap spin orientations in fig . ( [ fig : victor2 ] ) . the upper panel of the figure shows that the transmission coefficients for the p configuration are strongly spin - polarized . this polarization remains at the fermi level , which suggests that these junctions could act as spin filters . the bottom panel of the figure shows the transmission coefficients for the ap configuration . the fact that these are different from those of the p spin orientation hints that these junctions could show significant gmr ratios . to quantify these statements , we compute the charge current of the junction in the p and ap configurations @xmath220 and @xmath364 and plot them in fig . ( [ fig : victor3 ] ) . the figure shows that indeed these junctions show magnetorresistive properties . the figure also demonstrates that the currents depend on the number of @xmath18-points . to further give quantitative estimates of the spin activity of the junctions , we define the spin polarization in the p arrangement and the gmr ratio as @xmath365 where @xmath366 are the spin - dependent currents for the p orientation . we show in fig . ( [ fig : victor4 ] ) these two magnitudes as a functions of the bias voltage applied to the junction . we indeed find large spin signals for these devices . furthermore , the figure demonstrates that at least 16 @xmath18-points are needed to achieve converged results . and ( b ) gmr ratio plotted as a function of the bias voltage applied to the junction shown in fig . ( [ em_victor1 ] ) . the different curves correspond to different numbers of @xmath18-points . ] gollum can profit from the improved chemical accuracy delivered by the most advanced density functionals . as an example , we discuss here the transport properties of the junction shown in fig . ( [ fig : graphene - junction ] ) , where a single phthalocyanine trimer molecule bridges two graphene electrodes separated by a physical gap of length 17.265 . these graphene sheets are armchair - terminated and passivated by hydrogen atoms . periodic boundary conditions are applied in the two directions across the graphene plane . the phthalocyanine units are linked by butadiyne chains . the planar anchors couple to the graphene via interaction of the @xmath367-clouds and therefore an accurate description of the chemical bonding and transport properties can only be achieved by the use of a van der waals density functional . we use here the implementation of dion et al . in the siesta program @xcite . we have computed the hamiltonian and overlap matrix elements using a double - zeta basis set for all the elements in the simulation , together with a grid fineness of 200 rydberg . by minimizing the energy , we find that the molecule sits at a height of 3.4 above the sheets . we have studied the impact of the length of the electrode gap on the transport properties of the junction by attaching additional armchair layers to the edges of both sheets ; these layers are made of two carbon rows , and have a width of 2.502 . the transmission coefficients for several gap widths are shown in fig . ( [ fig : graphene - gap ] ) . we find several breit - wigner resonances associated with molecular levels of the trimer . remarkably , these do not shift in energy as the gap width varies@xcite . however , deep dips appear for several gap widths . these are associated with interference among the different paths whereby electrons can propagate between the molecule and the electrodes . we have also studied the change in the transmission curves as the molecule is displaced laterally and longitudinally across the physical gap . we show representative examples of the transmission curves for longitudinal displacements in fig . ( [ fig : graphene - y ] ) . the figures show that the energy positions of the molecular breit - wigner resonances remain almost constant . we have found the same behavior for other graphene - based junctions : the energy position of the breit - wigner resonances for a given graphene - based junction does not depend on the molecule position relative to the physical gap , provided that the bonding mechanism is by physisorption . this universality arises because physisorption carries no charge transfer between the molecule and the sheets . furthermore the electrodes are made from the same material and therefore there is no dipole moment associated with the contacts . finally , the @xmath368 hybridization between molecular orbitals and the electrode states is weaker than for the bonds present in most noble - metal / single - atom contacts , and does not have a large impact on the nature of the molecular orbitals . as an example of a gollum calculation using a lda+u density functional@xcite , we describe in this section a case where strong electronic correlations may affect the transport properties of a nanoscale - scale junction . we discuss the junction shown in fig . ( [ fig : ldau - geometry ] ) . here gold ( 001 ) electrodes bridge either a porphyrin ( p ) or a metallo - porphyrin molecule ( cup or cop ) . electron flow through any of these three porphyrin molecules is carried by molecular orbitals that hybridize strongly with the gold s - orbitals . this gives rise to broad breit - wigner resonances in the transmission coefficients that are identical for the three molecules . however , for the cup and cop junctions , additional electron paths are created whereby electrons hop into and off the localized d - orbitals of the transition metal atom . the interference between direct and d - orbital - mediated paths creates sharp fano resonances that can however be masked by the much wider breit - wigner resonances@xcite . we see below how including strong correlations in the d - orbitals of the co and cu atoms in terms of a lda+u approach produces strong shifts in the energy dependence of those resonances . we have computed the hamiltonian using the siesta code , where we have picked a single zeta basis for the gold atoms at the electrodes , a double - zeta - polarized basis set for all the atoms in the molecule and a gga functional . we have included a @xmath233 correction term for the d - orbitals of the cu and co atoms in a mean - field fashion , in the spirit of the lda+u approach@xcite . we present here our results for values of @xmath233 equal to 0 , 2.5 and 4.5 ev . of the junction shown in fig . ( [ fig : ldau - geometry ] ) , where the central molecule is cup . @xmath369 is plotted as a function of the energy @xmath62 referred to the fermi energy @xmath247 of the scattering region . the different panels correspond to the different @xmath233 corrections added to the dft hamiltonian ( see text ) . the green and gold ellipses encircle masked fano resonances . they are originated by paths hopping onto the cu 3d@xmath370 or d@xmath371 orbitals . the red ellipse circles a sharp breit - wigner resonance coming from c and n atoms . ] we find that the transmission coefficients of the three molecules display the same wide breit - wigner resonances , that correspond to molecular orbitals hybridizing strongly with the electrodes . these are shown in figs . ( [ fig : ldau - cup ] ) and ( [ fig : ldau - cop ] ) for cup and cop respectively . in addition , the three molecules show a sharp breit - wigner resonance that is marked by a red ellipse in the figures . this resonance corresponds to a molecular orbital encompassing c and n atoms that is weakly bonded to the electrodes . interestingly , this sharp breit - wigner resonance shifts in energy if we change the value of the coulomb interaction @xmath233 for the cup and cop junctions . to understand this phenomenon , we have looked at the density of states of the junction projected onto each atomic orbital , and the local density of states integrated in a narrow energy window around the red resonance . we have found that the n- and c - based molecular orbital hybridizes with the d@xmath372 orbital of the copper or cobalt atoms and is therefore affected by the @xmath233-term . we have found additional sharp peaks appearing in @xmath373 for the cup and cop junction that do not show up for the simple porphyrin junction . these are marked by green , blue and gold circles in figs . ( [ fig : ldau - cup ] ) and ( [ fig : ldau - cop ] ) . these seem to be sharp breit - wigner resonances also . however , we have demonstrated@xcite that they are actually fano resonances , where the fano dip is masked by the transmission of the neighboring wide breit - wigner resonances . by plotting the density of states of the junction projected in each orbital , we indeed find that they correspond to the copper d@xmath370 or d@xmath371 orbitals . because these fano resonances are associated with atomic d - orbitals strongly localized in the transition metal atom , we expect that adding a @xmath233-term will have a strong impact on their energy position . ( [ fig : ldau - cup ] ) shows how these resonances indeed shift in energy as @xmath233 is increased . note that one of the fano resonances coming from the d@xmath370 copper orbital is strongly pinned to the fermi energy , while other resonances rapidly move down in energy . we analyze in this section the transport properties of a series ( 111 ) gold junctions that are bridged by ope derivatives . the backbone of these molecules has a varying number of rings ranging from one to three . the molecules may be oriented fully perpendicular to the electrodes surfaces , or making a tilting angle , as we show in fig . ( [ tricene45 ] ) it is well established by now @xcite that gold junctions that contain conjugated thiol - terminated molecules like opes have a larger conductance when the molecule is tilted . this is due to the increased overlap of the @xmath374 states of the sulfur atoms when the angle between the molecule and the normal to the surface increases . we show in this section that a plain dft - based calculation predicts that the largest conductance occurs when the molecule is oriented perpendicular to the electrodes . this deficiency is remedied by the use of the saint method . this method is an efficient semi - empirical correction that allows us to obtain quantitative agreement between dft calculations and experiments@xcite , as we have already stressed in section ii . ( color online ) a ( 111 ) gold junction sandwiching a tricene - dithiol molecule . the molecule is coupled to one ad - atom on one side and to a hollow gold site at the other end , and its orientation is titled with respect to the electrodes normal line . ] the hamiltonian of the junction has been obtained with the code siesta and a local density approximation ( lda ) functional@xcite . we have picked a single - zeta basis for the gold atoms of the electrodes , and a double - zeta - polarized basis for the atoms in the molecule . the pls of the electrodes contain three atomic layers , each having @xmath375 atoms . we have chosen junction geometries where the molecular derivatives are oriented either perpendicularly to the gold surfaces or making a 45 degrees angle , as shown in fig . ( [ tricene45 ] ) . due to this tilting angle , we had to use a non - periodic scattering region , as in fig . the scattering regions consisted therefore of the molecule , the two surfaces containing two atomic layers each and 3 pls on each branch followed by vacuum . we chose pl2 as the tpl , so all hamiltonian matrix elements of pl3 were chopped off . ( color online ) transmission of the junction shown in fig . ( [ tricene45 ] ) , containing an ope molecule with 3 rings . @xmath373 has been calculated ( a ) without and ( b ) with saint corrections . continuous and dashed lines correspond to perpendicular and tilted ( 45 degrees ) molecules , respectively . ] we have computed the transmission curves @xmath373 for the referred ope derivatives using conventional dft , and have found for all of them that the conductance ( computed from @xmath376 ) is larger if the molecule is oriented perpendicular to the electrodes . the upper panel in fig . ( [ t_saint_1 ] ) demonstrates this behavior for an ope containing three rings . the figure shows that the higher conductance is originated by the position of the homo level of the molecule , that is placed only slightly below the fermi energy of the scattering region . in contrast , the homo level of the tilted molecule is shifted farther away from @xmath247 . this situation demands for the use of the saint correction scheme , that will reposition the molecular orbital levels at their correct energies . we show in the bottom panel of the figure that this is indeed the case , and that by the use of the saint scheme , the correct experimental trend is recovered , where tilted molecules show larger conductances . we have verified that the same change happens for ope molecules containing one and two rings . finally , we plot in fig . ( [ t_saint_2 ] ) @xmath373 for the three molecules ( containing one , two and three rings ) for perpendicular and tilted orientations . ( [ g.saint ] ) we show the transmission of the ope derivatives with a number of rings between 1 and 3 and two tilting angles , 0 and 45 degrees . the figures show that all those junctions where the derivative is oriented perpendicularly to the gold surface ( defined here to be 0 degrees ) show a larger transmission at the fermi level than the tilted cases in contrast with our expectations discussed above @xcite . ( color online ) transmission of the junction shown in fig . ( [ tricene45 ] ) , containing an ope molecule with ( a ) 1 , ( b ) 2 and ( c ) 3 rings . @xmath373 has been calculated with saint corrections . continuous and dashed lines correspond to perpendicular and tilted ( 45 degrees ) molecules , respectively . ] .[tabsaint.2 ] corrections entering the saint scheme for occupied and unoccupied levels given in ev . [ cols="^,^,^",options="header " , ] the physical mechanism whereby the conductance of the tilted configuration is higher , is due to the higher hybridization between the molecular orbitals and the electrodes in the tilted configuration . this increases the width of the transmission resonances and therefore decreases the effect of opening the gap with the saint correction . on the other hand , the image charge correction is also larger in the tilted configuration , since the molecule is closer to the surfaces , and therefore the reduction in the opening of the gap is also larger , which means the final gap ends up smaller in the tilted configuration . the conductance of each case is summarized in fig . ( [ g.saint ] ) . notice that the saint correction scheme changes qualitatively the physical picture in this junction . our procedure for the saint correction scheme is as follows . we first calculate the ionization potential ( ip ) and electron affinity ( ea ) of the molecules in the gas phase . these gas phase corrections open the dft homo - lumo gap . however , these bare shifts need to be corrected because of image charge effects . the final values for the correction shifts are summarized in table ( [ tabsaint.2 ] ) . notice that the corrections are very similar in magnitude and have opposite signs@xcite . as noted above , gollum has a simple and flexible input data structure so that model hamiltonians can be utilized easily . as a simple example of a simulation exhibiting kondo and coulomb blockade behavior , we show here results obtained from gollum for a tight - binding single - level anderson model coupled to two semi - infinite chains , that corresponds to taking @xmath377 in eq . ( [ eq : anderson - hamiltonian ] ) . due to the coupling to the two leads , the correlated level acquires a finite bandwidth @xmath378 where @xmath379 is the density of states in the leads . for vanishing @xmath363 the model is in the so - called atomic limit which is characterized by sharp peaks in the @xmath380-level density of states @xmath381 at @xmath382 and @xmath383 . this limit corresponds to the coulomb blockade regime in an actual junction where the conductance is strongly suppressed except at the charge degeneracy points . however , when the coupling to the leads increases ( @xmath363 becomes larger than the temperature @xmath369 , but is still smaller than @xmath233 ) , virtual processes allow the charge and spin in the molecule to fluctuate and a resonance close to the fermi energy appears due to the kondo effect . this simple model therefore captures relevant physics of molecular junctions such as the appearance of the coulomb blockade effect , and the crossover from the coulomb blockade to the kondo regime as the temperature is lowered below the kondo temperature @xmath384 where the last expression holds in the so - called symmetric limit @xmath385 . the interpolative impurity solver implemented in gollum provides a good quantitative description of the above phenomena in the weak coupling regime and is also qualitatively correct in the intermediate and strong coupling regimes . it however overestimates the width of the kondo resonance . we show in fig . [ fig : anderson - t ] ( a ) the zero - voltage transmission curve @xmath373 computed with gollum , and using the single - level anderson hamiltonian ( [ eq : anderson - hamiltonian ] ) in the symmetric limit . we take the following parameters : @xmath386 ev , @xmath387 and @xmath388 so that @xmath389 and @xmath390 , placing the junction in the strong correlation regime . these parameters yield a kondo temperature @xmath391 . the figure shows that the interpolative solution provides a transmission curve featuring the lower and upper hubbard bands placed at their correct position and having the right width , together with a sharp kondo resonance at low temperatures which progressively smoothens and eventually disappears as the temperature is raised . however , the interpolative solution provides a kondo temperature @xmath392 , e.g. : two orders of magnitude larger than the exact one . we now show the results obtained from gollum for a similar junction , shown in fig . ( [ fig : anderson - molecule ] ) , where a hydrogen atom bridges two gold ( 001 ) electrodes . in this case , the input hamiltonian is generated by the dft code siesta and the leads are repeated periodically in the plane perpendicular to the transport direction , using pl unit cells in ab stacking and @xmath393 atoms in each atomic layer . we have used a single - zeta basis set and a generalized gradient approximation functional . we have adjusted the distance @xmath380 between the hydrogen atom and the leads to reproduce a coupling similar to that set for the above anderson model which is achieved with @xmath394 . the generated transmission curve is shown in fig . [ fig : anderson - t ] ( b ) for the same three temperatures used for the anderson hamiltonian . we find that the shape of the transmission curves remains qualitatively the same . however , both the lower and upper hubbard bands and the kondo resonance are now sharper at their tips . using gollum , we subsequently apply a gate voltage @xmath395 to the gold - hydrogen - gold junction and compute the low - voltage conductance @xmath324 as a function of @xmath395 to compare the results using plain dft versus dft in combination with the interpolative method . the results are shown in fig . ( [ fig : anderson - gate ] ) . we have not included the double - counting term to make the comparison between both approaches more explicit . the figure nicely shows how the interpolative method splits the single dft peak into two coulomb blockade peaks and also a kondo peak . the figure also shows how the kondo peak disappears at temperatures above @xmath396 leaving only the coulomb blockage features . finally , we subject the gold - hydrogen - gold junction to the combined effect of finite bias @xmath1 and gate @xmath395 voltages . fig . ( [ fig : anderson - diamond ] ) shows density - contour plots of the low - voltage conductance as a function of @xmath1 and @xmath395 . this figure demonstrates that gollum can nicely reproduce coulomb blockade diamonds , as well as the kondo line , that disappears as the temperature is raised above @xmath396 . we demonstrate with two examples how gollum incorporates finite - voltage effects . in the first , we have computed the current - voltage characteristics of a gold ( 001 ) junction sandwiching an alkane molecule , that we show in fig . ( [ alkane4 ] ) . we have computed the zero - bias hamiltonian of the junction using the siesta code , with a double - zeta - polarized basis for all the atoms , and a gga functional . the pls contain two atomic layers , with @xmath393 atoms each . we have applied periodic boundary conditions across the plane perpendicular to the transport direction and have computed @xmath397 at the @xmath363 point . for every given voltage @xmath1 , we modify the em hamiltonian as described in eq . ( [ voltage ] ) . all the orbitals @xmath26 at the left branch in the em region in fig . ( [ alkane4 ] ) are shifted by @xmath398 , starting at the tpl and stopping at the linking sulfur atom . similarly , the orbitals at the right branch in the em region are shifted by @xmath399 all , starting at the linking sulfur atom and including those at the tpl . the current @xmath400 is then computed from the modified hamiltonian @xmath401 . the resulting @xmath170 curve is shown as a red dashed line in fig . ( [ alkane5 ] ) . for comparison , the black line in the same figure shows the @xmath170 curves obtained with a full negf simulation using the code smeagol . finally , the dot - dashed green line shows the current - voltage curve obtained from gollum by integrating the zero - voltage transmissions obtained from @xmath402 . the figure demonstrates that our proposed method reproduces rather accurately the features found in the full negf calculation , including the ndr feature at @xmath403 volt , while the plain equilibrium calculation fails to reproduce the gross features of the current - voltage characteristics . it underestimates the low - voltage conductance by a factor of two . as a second example , we have calculated the current - voltage characteristics of a ( 111 ) gold junction sandwiching a porphyrin molecule . the junction geometry is similar to that shown in fig . ( [ fig : ldau - geometry ] ) . the sulfur atoms attach to the electrodes at a hollow site . the porphyrin molecule does not have in the present case a metallic atom at the center , but has two saturating hydrogen atoms instead . we have performed two series of calculations . in the first , the geometry and physical gap distance has been relaxed and the calculations have been done at the most stable configuration . in the second , we have pulled the electrodes and sulfur atoms away . to do so , we have increased the sulfur - molecule distance by 0.3 . the current - voltage curves are shown in fig . ( [ porphirin ] ) . these characteristics do not show non - trivial features . we note again that the plain calculation using zero - voltage transmissions fails to reproduce the negf curve , underestimating the conductance by a factor close to 2 . in contrast , our prescription provides characteristics that reproduce accurately the negf results . to understand the difference between the dot - dashed green lines and the finite - voltage results of figs . ( [ alkane5 ] ) and ( [ porphirin ] ) , we have analyzed the evolution of the transmission coefficients @xmath404 as the voltage bias @xmath1 is ramped . we have found running negf simulations that the main non - equilibrium effect that affects the current for the two junctions above is an energy shift of the molecular homo resonance , that moves up as the voltage is increased . our prescription not only captures the effect , but also follows accurately the evolution of the resonance shifts dictated by the negf calculation , at least at low voltages . by shifting the homo resonance upwards in energy , a larger weight of the resonance enters into the energy integration window used to compute the current integral , hence increasing the current . in contrast , this effect can not be captured at all if one uses the plain @xmath405 transmission coefficients . ( color online ) a junction where a butane - dithiol molecule is sandwiched by ( 001 ) gold electrodes and subjected to a finite bias potential . ] in this section , we show how gollum can compute the thermoelectric properties of complex junctions formed by trapping a c@xmath406 molecule between gold electrodes . in a previous paper @xcite we have demonstrated both experimentally and theoretically that @xmath407-based nanojunctions show promisingly - high values for the thermopower and figure of merit . however the temperature dependence of these values and the fluctuations caused by the exact geometrical details have not been thoroughly investigated , partly due to the computationally - expensive nature of the calculations . here we show that the fast and efficient implementation of gollum allows us to undertake a more complete exploration of the transport properties of these c@xmath406-based junctions . the systems of interest consist of two ( 111 ) gold leads that can be tilted an angle @xmath21 relative to each other . each lead is terminated using either a flat surface or a pyramid , as shown in fig . ( [ fig : c60 ] ) . we have performed dft calculations using the code siesta , with a double - zeta - polarized basis set , and the lda functional@xcite . we have relaxed the molecular geometries using a force tolerance of 0.02 ev / and have found the equilibrium distance between the leads and the c@xmath406 molecule to be of about 0.22 nm , depending on the exact orientation of the molecule . this result is in good agreement with other previously reported distances @xcite . we have kept this distance fixed in all subsequent transport calculations . however , we have taken for completeness five possible orientations of the @xmath407 molecule relative to the electrodes . these are : ( a ) a c - c bond between a hexagon and a pentagon facing the au surface ; ( b ) a hexagon facing the au surface ; ( c ) a pentagon facing the au surface ; ( d ) a bond between two hexagons facing the au surface ; and ( e ) a single atom facing the au surface . we have also tilted one of the electrodes in steps of 15 degrees between 0 and 60 degrees to see the interference effects caused by the exact position of the tip on the surface of the fullerene , recalculating the thermoelectric properties at each step . the starting position ( for @xmath408 ) for the c@xmath406 against the electrodes is such that one of its pentagons is facing the au surfaces . molecule . the electrodes are terminated as either a flat surface ( upper panel ) or a pyramid ( lower panel ) , and can be tilted an angle @xmath21 relative to each other . ] ) having flat or pyramid - terminated electrodes ; @xmath21 is the rotation angle . figs . ( a)-(b)-(c)-(d ) show two - dimensional contour plots of the conductance @xmath324 ( measured in units of @xmath325 ) , the thermopower @xmath409 ( measured in @xmath410 ) , the thermal conductance @xmath411 ( measured in nw / k ) , and the figure of merit @xmath412 ( dimensionless ) . the vertical and horizontal axes are the temperature t measured in kelvin and the tilting angle @xmath21 for flat - electrode junctions ( e)-(f)-(g)-(h ) show the same magnitudes for pyramid - terminated electrodes . note that the color code is different for each figure . ] the results of our calculations are shown in figure ( [ fig : c60 - 1 ] ) . by taking horizontal cuts through these surfaces , we can see clear evidence of quantum interference as the angle changes and the tip is repositioned around the fullerene surface . for the conductance @xmath324 , these oscillations are almost temperature independent , whereas in the case of the thermopower @xmath409 , the thermal conductance @xmath411 and the electronic figure of merit zt , these oscillations are almost negligible at low temperatures and then grow with @xmath369 . comparing the conductance obtained with flat electrodes against that with pyramid - terminated electrodes , we can clearly see that @xmath324 decreases substantially when using the pyramid - like electrodes , in agreement with ref . furthermore in the case of flat electrodes the conductance fluctuates with the angle @xmath21 by about half an order of magnitude , whereas for the pyramid - terminated electrodes we find a larger change of almost one order of magnitude . this again demonstrates that the pyramid - terminated electrode scans the molecular surface like an stm tip , with improved detail , while part of these features are blurred when using a flat electrode . the flat - electrode junctions possess conductances values of about 0.6 - 1.2 @xmath413 , while junctions with pyramid tips have conductances of order 0.015 - 0.15 @xmath413 . we overestimate the experimental values for @xmath324 @xcite , by about one order of magnitude , a known problem associated with the underestimation of the homo - lumo gap inherent to the plain dft approach . as expected , the thermopower @xmath409 is more sensitive to the angle @xmath21 when using pyramid - terminated junctions compared with the case of flat - surfaced junctions . interestingly , @xmath409 is quite high especially at the higher temperatures , achieving values of of about @xmath414 to @xmath415 . ab - initio force - relaxation simulations show that it is possible to sculpt complex three - dimensional structures of nanoscale - scale dimensions by cutting shapes into a graphene bilayer @xcite . we find that the edges of the two graphene sheets coalesce in order to saturate dangling bonds and to maximize the degree of @xmath416 hybridization . for example , by cutting a cross shape in a bilayer graphene sheet , the resulting sculpturene is the three - dimensional crossbar carbon nanotube ( cnt ) shown in fig . ( [ fig : four - probe - cnt ] ) , which is an example of a four - terminal electronic device . this four - terminal device is composed of two armchair and two zigzag cnt electrodes . these become perfectly periodic cnt leads ( shown with blue ) far enough from the junction . to perform a gollum - based four - terminal calculation , we obtain the mean - field hamiltonian of this structure using the siesta code , with a double - zeta - polarized basis set and a gga functional@xcite . we start with the referred cross - shaped bilayer graphene sheet and after relaxing the inter - atomic forces to tolerances below 0.02 ev / , we find the crossbar shaped device shown in figure ( [ fig : four - probe - cnt ] ) . we feed the resulting ab - initio hamiltonian into gollum , and compute the transmission coefficients @xmath417 between every possible combination of pairs of leads . notice that the armchair cnt leads are semiconducting , while the zigzag cnts are metallic . we therefore expect different qualitative behaviors for the transmission properties among the different arms . this is shown in fig . ( [ fig : t-12 - 34 ] ) , where the transmission coefficients between the two armchair arms @xmath418 are much smaller than those connecting the zigzag arms @xmath419 . in addition , the figure indicates that the central cross area , where the two arms join together is not transparent , but introduces strong scattering . similarly , the transmission from lead 1 to lead 3 also shows a reduced transmission at low energies due to the semiconducting behavior of the armchair lead 1 , see fig ( [ fig : t-12 - 34 ] ) . this figure shows that @xmath420 due to the junction symmetry . and leads 3 and 4 @xmath419 ( solid black and dashed red lines respectively ) . energies are measured in ev and referred to the fermi energy of the scattering region . ] , solid black line ) and between lead 1 and lead 3 ( @xmath421 , dashed red line ) . energies are measured in ev and referred to the fermi energy of the scattering region . ] in the literature , most theoretical analyses of phase - coherent transport properties assume that the junction is immersed in vacuum and therefore ignore the effects of the surrounding environment . in contrast , many experiments are carried out under ambient conditions , which can have a marked effect on transport properties@xcite . if surrounding environmental molecules possess a dipole moment , then the scattering region will be subject to a fluctuating electrostatic field . previous work to investigate the impact of environmental water on the transport properties of a a single - molecule junction@xcite also took into account the effect of a solvation shell of water molecules surrounding the junction . gollum describes these effects systematically , by noting that for nanostructures such as single - molecule junctions , the timescale for such fluctuations is typically longer than the time taken for an electron to pass through the device and therefore one can adopt the born - oppenheimer approximation and freeze the environment during each electron transit . however , successive electrons experience different environmental snapshots and therefore are subjected to different instantaneous mean field hamiltonians leading to different instantaneous conductances . the measured ( time - averaged ) electrical conductance will hence be an ensemble average over these snapshots . to obtain a series of environmental snapshots , gollum uses classical molecular dynamics to describe the environmental molecules and for each snapshot , feeds the resulting geometries into a dft code to compute the corresponding self - consistent hamiltonian . the resulting mean field hamiltonian is then used to compute the scattering matrix and related transport properties . ) for 100 snapshots . ] to illustrate this approach , we compute here the ensemble averaged conductance of the junction shown in fig . ( [ fig : solvent - molecule ] ) , where two pi - stacked monothiol terminated oligophenyleneethynylenes form a bridge between two gold ( 001 ) electrodes . the bridging molecule is surrounded by two different solvents : decane and 1,4-dioxane,1,2,4-trichlorobenzene ( tcb ) . an example of a junction surrounded by a shell of tcb molecules is shown in the lower panel of fig . ( [ fig : solvent - molecule ] ) . we have tested here the classical molecular dynamics packages lammps@xcite and dlpoly@xcite , but gollum is flexible enough to accept coordinates from other classical molecular dynamics packages . in what follows , we show results obtained with lammps , where we have used the dreiding force field to describe the intra- and inter - molecular interactions and have employed the reaxff forcefield to obtain the initial charges . to create the environment , we place two hundred solvent molecules surrounding the backbone molecule . we perform the simulations using a constant temperature and volume ( nvt ) ensemble and subsequently a constant temperature and pressure ( npt ) thermostat . we equilibrate the junction for 150 ps with 0.1 fs time steps continuously raising the temperature to 290 k. we do not include the gold electrodes in the molecular dynamics simulation , so to simulate the binding of the anchor groups , we hold the positions of the two terminating atoms which connect to the electrodes fixed . we record between 350 and 500 snapshots of the junction , that have been taken every 2ps . for each snapshot , we feed the atomic coordinates into the dft code siesta and generate the dft hamiltonian . we then feed the hamiltonians into the transport code to compute the electrical conductance . some example transmission curves for 100 snapshots of the junction with a tcb solvent are shown in the right panel in fig . ( [ fig : solvent - molecule ] ) . we note that the the room - temperature dynamics of the atoms at the junction lead to a large spread in the transmission curves , and therefore to many different values of the low - voltage conductance . we therefore assemble conductance histograms to help identify the most probable conductance values . the resulting histograms in the presence of decane and tcb solvents are shown in fig . ( [ fig : solvent - histogram ] ) . the fact that the most probable conductance values are different shows that ambient - conditions or liquid - immersed molecular electronics experiments are affected by the surrounding solvent . notice that in these simulations we kept fixed the molecule - electrode geometry , so the spread in @xmath324 is due entirely to environmental effects . ) for two different solvents : decane ( left ) and tcb ( right ) . ] the fact that the transport properties of nanoscale junctions depends on the surrounding environment leads to a wide range of possible sensing applications . in this section , we demonstrate the versatility of gollum by showing how it can be used to predict the change in conductance of a nanopore , when a single dna strand is trans - located through it . deoxyribonucleic acid ( dna ) is a molecule that encodes the genetic instructions used in the development and functioning of all known living organisms and many viruses . dna molecules are double - stranded helices , consisting of two long biopolymers composed of simpler units called nucleotides . each nucleotide is composed of one of the four nucleobases guanine ( g ) , adenine ( a ) , thymine ( t ) and cytosine ( c ) , which are attached to a backbone made of alternating sugar and phosphate groups . the two polymer strands are bound together by non - covalent bonds that link base pairs and are easily separated to form two single - stranded dna molecules ( ssdna ) molecules . dna sequencing aims at identifying the sequence of the dna bases in a sample of ssdna . many researchers are actively seeking new methods to sequence dna with improved reliability and scalability and that are economically viable . biological nanopores made from protein such as a - hemolysin have been shown experimentally to sense the presence of dna @xcite , but are also very sensitive to temperature and ph , and can only be used within a limited voltage bias window@xcite . as an alternative , solid state devices which can be integrated into existing semiconducting circuitry technology and that are robust to the chemical environment have been proposed as sensors @xcite . to demonstrate the versatility of gollum , we examine here the potential for dna nucleobase sensing of the sculpturene device shown in fig . ( [ fig : ttht ] ) , which comprises a torus - like nanopore connected to two cnt electrodes@xcite . the torus in the figure has an inner pore with a diameter of 1.6 nm , whereas the leads are two ( 6,6 ) armchair nanotubes having a diameter of about 5 . we have selected for our study six short strands of ssdna containing three bases , that are shown in fig . ( [ fig : base - sequences ] ) . we have first relaxed the coordinates of the nucleotides that are threading the pore , using the dft code siesta with a double - zeta basis set and a lda functional@xcite . since the pore diameter is slightly larger than the strand width , the strand and its nucleotides can adopt different conformations and orientations inside the pore . we accumulate snapshots of these different conformations and orientations for each of the six ssdna strands as they trans - locate the pore . for each snapshot , we compute the current - voltage curve and subtract the current for the empty pore @xmath422 . the current averaged over snapshots @xmath423 for each ssdna strand is plotted in fig . ( [ fig : ivcurves - sequences ] ) . the sizable height of the curves demonstrate that the conductance of the pore is sensitive to the gating effect produced by the presence of ssdna strands inside the pore . furthermore , the different behavior of the curves means that , armed with a proper statistical analysis , the sculpturene device can distinguish different nucleotide sequences , so that this kind of device could be utilized potentially as a discriminating dna sensor . curves for each of the six sequences shown in fig . ( [ fig : base - sequences ] ) , where the current has been averaged over different pore - nucleotide relative angles and the current of the empty pore has been subtracted . ] a large body of experiments in single - molecule electronics is performed using the mechanically - controlled break junction ( mcbj ) technique , in which a metallic strip is pulled slowly until it breaks into two separate pieces . this process enables the formation of electrodes with molecular - scale gaps , which can be bridged by a single molecule . experimentally , these two electrodes are repeatedly pulled away or pushed towards each other . by applying a small bias voltage and recording the current passing through the junction , the low - voltage conductance can be measured as a function of the distance between the electrodes . when the distance is small enough , a single molecule can bridge the gap between the electrodes and its conductance can be measured . in the literature , most theoretical studies are confined to small numbers of ideal geometries and binding configurations . in this section , our aim is to demonstrate that the versatility of gollum allows us to compute whole pulling curves of conductance versus electrode separation . the single - molecule junction that we discuss here is shown in fig . ( [ fig : pulling - example ] ) and consists of gold ( 111 ) electrodes . the electrodes in the simulation are terminated by pyramids and bridged by a bipyridine molecule . to simulate a stretching process we have created one hundred geometries of the junction , each with a different distance @xmath380 between the center of the end atoms of the two leads . to optimize the atomic arrangement of each of the hundred geometries , we start from an idealized setup consisting of the two pyramids surrounded by vacuum ( e.g. : not attached to the gold leads ) . we place the molecule slightly shifted to one side to break the symmetry and keep an au - n bond - length of about 2 . we then relax the inter - atomic forces with the siesta code using a gga functional@xcite and a double - zeta - polarized basis set until each individual force is smaller than 0.02 ev / . we keep fixed the atomic positions of the bottom two layers of the pyramids during this geometry optimization . ( [ fig : pulling - geometries ] ) shows four of the hundred relaxed configurations achieved . ) for four different distances @xmath380 . ] we then reattach the crystalline gold leads , and impose periodic boundary conditions along the plane perpendicular to the transport direction . we use a sz basis for the gold atoms of the leads , together with a simplified pseudo - potential , where only the 6s channel is included to speed up the simulations . however , we use a double - zeta - polarized basis set for the atoms at the gold pyramids and in the molecule . siesta then creates the hamiltonian of each of the hundred junctions that we feed into gollum . figure ( [ fig : pulling - curve ] ) shows the low - voltage conductance @xmath324 versus the electrode separation @xmath380 . this pulling curve shows that during the pulling process the conductance possesses a plateau , in agreement with many experiments using mcbjs . this simulation also reveals that the aromatic rings contact directly the gold surface , therefore increasing the molecule - gold coupling and the molecular conductance . ) . @xmath324 is measured in units of @xmath325 and plotted as a function of the distance @xmath380 . each of the conductance points displayed correspond to one of the hundred relaxed configurations of the mcbj simulation . the figure also shows the four different distances @xmath380 corresponding to the relaxed geometries displayed in fig . ( [ fig : pulling - geometries ] ) . ] so far , all calculated quantities have been obtained from the modulus squared of the scattering matrix elements . to demonstrate that gollum also provides information about transport properties associated with the phases of the scattering matrix , we now examine an example of a quantum pump . quantum pumps are time - dependent electron scatterers , which are able to transport electrons between two external reservoirs subjected to the same chemical potential . the pump process is adiabatic if the frequency of the pump cycle is smaller than the inverse of the characteristic timescale of the scatterer , the wigner delay time@xcite . experimental @xcite and theoretical @xcite studies of adiabatic quantum pumps have examined the conditions for optimal pumping and the effects of noise and dissipation . adiabatic pumping can be understood in terms of the parametric derivative of the full scattering matrix @xmath409 at fixed chemical potential @xcite . an adiabatically - slowly time - varying scatterer connected by ideal channels to external reservoirs , produces a current @xmath424 pumped into the @xmath110th channel , where @xmath425 is the energy shift matrix defined by @xmath426 with @xmath409 being the full scattering matrix and @xmath427 the fermi energy . pumping can occur if the @xmath428-matrix depends on time through a parameter @xmath429 . hence currents can be expressed in terms of parametric derivatives @xmath430 where @xmath431 is the parametric current entering channel @xmath110 . since gollum gives us access to the full scattering matrix @xmath432 , it offers the possibility of investigating adiabatic pumping in nanostructures . we demonstrate this capability by calculating the charge pumped in a double - walled carbon nanotube nano - electromechanical device shown in fig . ( [ fig : shuttle ] ) @xcite , that mimics the experimental setup of ref . ( ) . since an electron current travelling along the inner tube can cause a chiral outer tube to rotate @xcite , the quantum pump shown in fig . ( [ fig : shuttle ] ) represents the inverse effect , in which rotation of the outer tube causes a current to flow along the inner tube . the position and orientation of the inner tube is kept fixed , while the shorter outer tube rotates slowly . the angle @xmath433 describes the real space rotation angle of the outer tube and also plays the role of the pumping parameter in this system . surrounds concentrically an inner tube , with an inter - layer spacing @xmath434 corresponding to the van der waals distance . the inner wall remains fixed , while the outer tube is rotated about the tube axis by the angle @xmath433 . a slow variation of @xmath433 results in a parametric current @xmath435 . finite charge can be pumped in one rotational cycle depending on the chiralities of the constituent tubes . ] to reveal the rich behavior of this family of quantum pumps , fig . ( [ fig : paremplot ] ) shows the parametric current , as a function of the rotational angle @xmath433 for a typical device . depending on the particular angle , charge may be pumped either from left to right or vice versa . the integral of this parametric emissivity within a full parametric cycle of @xmath436 is the number of electrons pumped per cycle . for a device consisting of a ( 5,5 ) carbon nanotube surrounded by a ( 14,6 ) outer nanotube . the outer tube rotates slowly around the inner one . the contour plot shows the current as a function of the rotational angle @xmath433 measured in degrees and the fermi energy @xmath427 measured in units of the hopping integral @xmath307 between carbon atoms . the orange color indicates charge being pumped from left to right and vice versa . ] in fig . ( [ fig:14 - 6plot ] ) we show the charge pumped in a ( 5,5 ) carbon nanotube with a ( 14,6 ) outer nanotube rotating slowly about it . the average pumped charge clearly drops by several orders of magnitude as the fermi energy is increased from zero . therefore for a most efficient pumping , the fermi energy should be close to the dirac point . note however , that the pumped charge could again increase if the fermi level is large enough to open another channel . beyond this average behavior , there exist numerous sharp peaks in the pumped charge . the location of these peaks correlates with fabry - perot resonances in the reflection coefficient . this suggests that the largest pumping occurs at those resonances . in other words , when the transmission is high , pumping is low , and vice versa . through the device discussed in fig . ( [ fig : paremplot ] ) as a function of the fermi energy measured in units of the hopping integral @xmath307 between carbon atoms at the cnts . the green solid line shows the charge pumped towards the left ; the red solid line shown the charge pumped towards the right . at certain energies , the pumped charge is very high . these peaks correlate with the fabry - perot resonances in the reflection coefficient @xmath238 . @xmath238 is shown as a solid blue line . ] finally , to demonstrate that gollum can handle the disordered systems , we calculate the ensemble - averaged conductivity @xmath12 of a two - terminal system on a square lattice , with leads attached to a disordered scattering region as shown in fig . ( [ fig : bd1 ] ) . the width of the system is @xmath437 unit cells and the length is varied between @xmath438 to @xmath439 unit cells . the conductivity is defined as @xmath440 , where @xmath441 is the transmission from the left lead to right lead evaluated at the fermi energy , @xmath442 ev . the tight - binding hamiltonian of the system has a single orbital per site , with nearest neighbour couplings . @xmath443 the site energies within the leads are @xmath444 ev , while the random site energies within the scattering region are uniformly distributed over the interval @xmath445 $ ] ev . figure ( [ fig : bd2 ] ) shows the the ensemble - averaged conductivity ( @xmath12 ) and transmission coefficient ( @xmath376 ) for the system shown in fig . ( [ fig : bd1 ] ) . it contains three regions . within the ballistic regime between @xmath446 and approximately @xmath447 , the conductivity increases linearly with length . in the diffusive region ( @xmath448 ) , the conductivity exhibits ohmic behavior and is almost independent of length . finally for @xmath291 greater than 100 , there is a cross over to the anderson localized regime . and transmission coefficient @xmath376 as a function of the number @xmath291 of unit cells in the transport direction , for the two probe square lattice shown in the previous figure . ] we end this article by showing how the spin - orbit interaction induces gaps at certain band crossings in the one - dimensional electronic structure of infinite nickel chains . these gaps may appear or not depending on the orientation of the atomic spins relative to the axis of the chain . they lead to dips in the transmission coefficient @xmath373 of the chain at the gap energies . we have simulated linear nickel chains using the dft program siesta . the chains have a single atom per unit cell and are oriented along the z - axis . we have used a standard set of pseudopotential parameters , a double - zeta basis set and simple lda for the exchange - correlation potential . we have checked that the electronic structure and @xmath373 are the same for any spin orientation if the spin - orbit interaction is set to zero , as is should due rotational invariance . however , if the spin - orbit interaction is switched on , then a finite yet small magnetic anisotropy barrier appears . we have found that if we choose the atomic spins to lie along the chain axis , then there are no spin - orbit gaps close to the fermi energy . as a consequence , the transmission coefficients with and without the spin - orbit interaction are indistinguishable from each other ( as shown in fig . ( [ fig : ni - chain - so ] ) ) . in contrast , when the atomic spins are oriented in a plane perpendicular to the chain axis , then several small gaps open around the fermi energy . these gaps are seen as dips in fig . ( [ fig : ni - chain - so ] ) . we have developed a new quantum transport code , which is fast , easy to use and versatile . this flexibility has been demonstrated by presenting a wide range of example calculations , encompassing charge , spin and thermal transport , corrections to density functional theory such as lda+u and spectral adjustments , transport in the presence of non - collinear magnetism , the quantum - hall effect , kondo and coulomb blockade effects , finite - voltage transport , multi - terminal transport , quantum pumps , superconducting nanostructures , environmental effects and pulling curves and conductance histograms for mechanically - controlled - break - junction experiments . further developments are in the pipeline , including the incorporation of phonon transport . gollum will soon be freely available from the following web site _ http://www.physics.lancs.ac.uk/gollum _ and the authors of this article are available to help potential users access the code . the research presented here was funded by the spanish ministerio de economa y competitividad through the grant fis2012 - 34858 , by the uk epsrc and by the european commission fp7 itn `` molesco '' project no . 606728 vmgs thanks the spanish ministerio de economa y competitividad for a ramn y cajal fellowship ( ryc-2010 - 06053 ) . lo has been supported by the hungarian scientic research fund no . jf wishes to thank useful discussions with n. lorente and a. kormanyos . we have described in section ii.a.2 the method employed by gollum to find the surface green s function @xmath259 of each lead . however , the solution of eq . ( [ gep ] ) gives with some frequency numerical inaccuracies which render the method useless as it stands . these inaccuracies are caused by the highly non - singular behavior of the hamiltonian matrix @xmath27 connecting adjacent pls . we discuss here the adaptation of the method described in refs . ( ) that gollum uses to regularize @xmath27 . mathematically , we perform an svd decomposition of this @xmath42 matrix , @xmath449 where @xmath233 and @xmath1 are unitary matrix and @xmath409 is a diagonal matrix containing the eigenvalues @xmath450 of @xmath27 . numerical algorithms usually arrange them in descending order . the condition number of @xmath27 is defined as the ratio @xmath451 between the maximum and minimum eigenvalues of @xmath27 . @xmath411 determines how singular is @xmath452 and therefore the propensity to suffer inaccuracies when handling @xmath27 . small eigenvalues @xmath450 appear whenever @xmath27 is very sparse . physically , this is originated for example if the pl are very long so that a large fraction of hopping integrals ( matrix elements of @xmath27 ) is zero . our first procedure to regularize @xmath27 consists in adding a real or complex random matrix to @xmath27 . we have found that this is frequently enough to render a regular @xmath27 matrix . if this first procedure fails this is because the orbitals involved do not play a role in the transport properties of the lead and should be decimated out , so that the dimensions of the @xmath453 matrix are reduced . notice that reducing the dimensions of @xmath27 has the advantage that the computation of the surface green s function @xmath259 is much lighter . however , the procedure must be performed with some care as finally @xmath259 must connect with the corresponding tpl of the em branch , whose matrices have dimensions @xmath42 . explicitly , we write the schroedinger equation of the infinite chain of the corresponding lead : @xmath454 where @xmath455 , @xmath26 labels the pl and runs from @xmath456 to @xmath457 and we assume that the chain will be chopped off at the @xmath458 pl and then connected to the tpl of the em . we first perform the svd decomposition of @xmath27 described in eq . ( [ svd ] ) . we then set to zero all eigenvalues smaller than a given tolerance @xmath459 . we have checked that setting @xmath460 provides unproblematic @xmath27 and @xmath461 . let us assume that we set to zero @xmath462 eigenvalues of @xmath27 , so that @xmath463 remain non - zero . we now construct the matrices @xmath464 we transform eq . ( [ lead - equation ] ) for all sites up to site @xmath465 as follows : this set of equations generates the new hamiltonians of each lead , and connects it with the extended molecule . overlap matrices must also be decimated as they enter into the expression for the group velocity , eq . ( [ group - velocity ] ) . the denominator in this equation looks like @xmath471 where we have applied the svd transformation to the overlap matrices @xmath472 Abstract:

Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.

Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered . Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video . Paper: soon after the invention of inflationary cosmology it was realized that inflation may divide our universe into many exponentially large domains corresponding to different metastable vacuum states @xcite . the total number of such vacuum states in string theory can be enormously large @xcite . a combination of these two facts with the kklt mechanism of vacuum stabilization @xcite gave rise to what is now called the string landscape scenario @xcite . the purpose of this paper is to clarify some features of the landscape . in particular , one may wonder what are the properties of the domain walls separating different vacua , how these domains may form , and how large will be the fraction of the volume of the universe inside different domains . to this end , we will construct a broad class of static bps domain wall solutions interpolating between different ads or minkowski vacua with unbroken supersymmetry . quite generally , these bps domain walls may interpolate between various minima , maxima , or saddle points of the scalar field potential . bps domain wall solutions in 4-dimensional @xmath3 supergravity were first studied in @xcite . the methods used for that analysis have been later refined and generalized to a variety of models , for different number of dimensions and supersymmetries , see e.g. @xcite . our present aim is to further extend these methods to make them suitable for investigation of the string landscape scenario . following the logic of the recent developments , we will begin with an investigation of the supersymmetric vacua arising from flux compactifications prior to the kklt uplifting , and later introduce the more physically relevant metastable de sitter vacua . we start in section 2 with an overview of some known features of domain walls in effective d=4 , n=1 supergravity . the new results here include the derivation of bps domain wall gradient flow equations in generic models with f - term potentials with arbitrary khler potential , superpotential and number of moduli . we rewrite the gravitational action , including the boundary @xmath4-terms in a bps form : when the flow equations are satisfied , the integrand of the action defines the bps domain wall tension . afterward , in the spirit of the analogous work in five dimensions in the context of the ads / cft correspondence , where domain walls are viewed as dual to renormalization group flows @xcite , we present the bps flow equations in the form of rg flows and provide the relevant `` c - theorem '' . in section 3 we give examples of bps domain walls where the potential has more than one critical point but there is no barrier between them . our examples include an ads minimum and an asymptotically minkowski vacuum . other examples have critical points at finite distance in the moduli space : an ads saddle point and an ads minimum , or an ads maximum and an ads saddle point . a particularly interesting case of flux vacua area codes in a calabi yau hypersurface required the study of the flow of four moduli . they flow from one critical point of the potential , the landau ginsburg fixed point , towards the second critical point with larger absolute value of the cosmological constant near the conifold . in section 4 we study a class of models in stringy landscape with a barrier between critical points . we have examples of a local minkowski or ads minimum and another absolute ads minimum of larger absolute value of the cosmological constant . in case of ads - ads wall , we display the domain walls with critical and super - critical tension . the last case has the superpotential crossing zero between two ads vacua . the results of our investigation in sections 2 - 4 directly apply to the transitions between supersymmetric ads and minkowski vacua . however , the most interesting parts of the string theory landscape correspond to ds vacua . these vacua can be obtained from supersymmetric ads or minkowski vacua by uplifting , which can be achieved , e.g. , by adding some anti - d3 branes @xcite . this procedure breaks supersymmetry and may destabilize some of the vacua , in particular those which corresponded to maxima and saddle points . as a result , some of the bps wall solutions may disappear after the uplifting , whereas some others will remain . however , instead of describing the static bps domain walls , they will describe domain walls moving with acceleration . such domain walls can be formed during the tunneling and bubble formation in the process of decay of metastable vacua , as discussed by coleman and de luccia ( cdl ) in @xcite . we will discuss this process in section 5 . if the uplifting is relatively small , which may happen when we uplift a supersymmetric minkowski vacuum , or a shallow ads vacuum , as in the version of the kklt scenario developed in ref . @xcite , then the properties of the domain walls do not differ much form the properties of the bps walls prior to the uplifting . in this case we will be talking about near - bps , or near - extremal walls and bubbles . the concept of near - bps walls and bubbles is closely related to the concept of near - extremal black holes . whereas at the extremal limit the bps black holes are absolutely stable and have zero temperature , the near - extremal black holes have a non - vanishing temperature , they can evaporate and eventually approach a stable extremal limit . the physics of near - extremal black holes has been studied intensively over the years : a remarkable agreement with the physics of d - branes was established under condition of a small deviation from extremality @xcite . in our new endeavor we will try to understand the rate of tunneling into a collapsing vacuum with a negative cosmological constant from uplifted slightly non - bps vacua using the proximity of the large size bubbles to the bps domain walls whose tension we can evaluate exactly . in the bps limit the corresponding bubbles have an infinite radius , but the near - bps ones have a large but finite radius @xcite . the description of these bubbles can be performed using the deviation from the bps limit as an expansion parameter . this simplifies investigation of bubble formation and vacuum decay in such models . in section 5 we will find , in particular , that the vacuum decay rate of the uplifted supersymmetric minkowski vacuum does not depend on the details of the model and is given by the universal expression @xmath5 , where @xmath6 is the entropy of the ds state . this decay rate is much higher than the typical rate of decay of a ds vacuum to a minkowski vacuum , which in many cases does not differ much from @xmath7 @xcite . in application to our vacuum with @xmath8 , we are talking about the difference in the decay rate by a factor @xmath9 . the situation is especially interesting in a more general case when we uplift the models with several different ads minima of the moduli potential . the ads vacuum with a smaller value of the volume modulus experiences a bigger uplifting . the scale of supersymmetry breaking in the uplifted vacuum is related to the magnitude of the uplifting . as a result , the decay of the uplifted ads vacuum to the collapsing space with a negative vacuum energy usually occurs much faster than the typical ds rate of the uplifted minkowski vacuum @xmath10 . under some conditions , the decay rate can be quite large , with the suppression factor @xmath11 being replaced by @xmath12 . here @xmath13 and @xmath14 is the depth of the ads minimum prior to the uplifting , which may be a hundred orders of magnitude greater than @xmath8 . in the kklt - type models , the depth of the ads vacuum prior to the uplifting is of the same order as @xmath15 , where @xmath16 is the gravitino mass after the uplifting @xcite . therefore in the class of models studied in section 5 , the vacuum decay rate due to the tunneling to a collapsing universe is related to the gravitino mass , @xmath17 . after the tunneling , the universe within each bubble with negative vacuum energy collapses within a microscopically small time @xmath18 . the condition that the lifetime of the uplifted vacuum is greater than the age of our part of the universe may serve as a vacuum superselection rule . an important feature of the decay of ds space to a minkowski vacuum or to a collapsing universe with a negative vacuum energy density is that the part of space that experiences such a decay never returns back to ds space . this is quite different from the back - and - forth transitions between various ds vacua , which may keep the system in a kind of thermal equilibrium . in this respect , the channels of irreversible decay of an uplifted ds vacuum to a minkowski vacuum or to a collapsing universe serve as sinks for the probability flow in the landscape . in section 6 we will show that the existence of such sinks has important implications for the calculations of the probabilities in the landscape . in particular , if one ignores the different rate of expansion of the universe in different vacua , i.e. uses a comoving volume distribution , then in the absence of the sinks , the fraction of the comoving volume of the universe in the state with a given vacuum energy density @xmath19 asymptotically approaches @xmath20 . this distribution has a sharp maximum at the smallest possible @xmath21 . meanwhile if the vacuum with the smallest possible @xmath21 is not the ground state but a sink , and the probability of tunneling to the sink is sufficiently large , then the fraction of the volume in the vacuum with the smallest @xmath21 will be exponentially suppressed , and the maximum of the probability distribution will be at larger values of @xmath21 . walls and bubbles considered in our paper interpolate between domains with different values of the scalar fields , but with the same values of fluxes . in section 7 we will briefly review our results and discuss a possibility of their generalization for the transitions between vacua with different fluxes . 1 cm in this paper we are going to analyze the domain wall solutions interpolating between different supersymmetric vacua of the landscape of string theory flux compactifications to 4 dimensions . we will focus on the case of @xmath3 supergravity . bps domain wall solutions with 1/2 of unbroken @xmath3 supersymmetry in the minimal 4-dimensional supergravity have been discussed in @xcite . the equations presented there refer to the case of a single scalar field . here we are going to extend this analysis to a more general setup allowing for the possibility of many moduli fields with generic metric in the moduli space . of course , in any sufficiently small patch , there is a possible reparametrization of the moduli space so that there is a single scalar field supporting the domain wall . in a rather generic setup , however , this is not possible globally , and therefore the equations we will propose in the following are more useful in this respect . the analysis presented here is mainly based on the approach presented in @xcite for the domain wall solutions of the minimal 5-dimensional supergravity . we briefly recall the main ingredients needed in order to discuss supersymmetric bosonic configurations of n=1 supergravity coupled to chiral multiplets . the bosonic sector of the action is @xmath22 where the potential can be expressed in terms of a superpotential @xmath23 as @xmath24 or , in terms of the covariantly holomorphic superpotential @xmath25 , as @xmath26 the covariant derivative is defined as @xmath27 on holomorphic quantities ( like @xmath28 ) and as @xmath29 on covariantly holomorphic quantities ( like @xmath30 ) . we will not consider vector multiplets and possible d - term extensions here . the relevant supersymmetry transformations ( of the gravitino and modulini ) are @xmath31 \delta\chi^{i}_{l } & = & \frac12 \gamma^{\mu } \partial_{\mu } z^{i}\epsilon_{r } - \frac12 g^{i\bar\jmath}{\rm e}^{k/2 } \overline{d_{j}w}\epsilon_{l } , \label{deltachi } \end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath32 is the @xmath33 khler connection . in the following we will consider flat space - like domain wall solutions of the supersymmetry conditions and of the supergravity equations of motion . for this reason we are going to use the following metric ansatz @xmath34 given the domain wall structure , we split the indices @xmath35 , @xmath36 . for the metric ( [ typei ] ) there is only one non - trivial component of the spin connection @xmath37 where @xmath38 , leading also to the ricci scalar ( which will become useful later ) @xmath39 . \label{scalari}\ ] ] plugging ( [ typei ] ) into the supersymmetry equations ( [ deltapsi])([deltachi ] ) and assuming that also the scalars @xmath40 depend only on the radial coordinate @xmath41 , one obtains @xmath42 \delta \psi_{i l } & = & \frac{a^\prime}{2 } \gamma_{\underline i}\gamma_{\underline r } \epsilon_l + \frac12 { \rm e}^{k/2 } w \gamma_i \epsilon_r \label{delpsiii } \\[2 mm ] \delta \chi_l & = & \frac12 \gamma^r z^{i\prime}(r ) \epsilon_r - \frac12 { \rm e}^{k/2 } g^{i\bar \jmath } \overline{d_j w } \epsilon_l , \label{delchii } \end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath43 was assumed . using also @xmath44 , one can start solving the various equations . from ( [ delpsiii ] ) , splitting the complex superpotential into norm and phase @xmath45 we get the projector condition @xmath46 from which the bps equation follows @xmath47 the condition ( [ proj0 ] ) can be assembled into a real projector @xmath48 ( satisfying @xmath49 ) acting on the full spinor as @xmath50 : @xmath51 . \label{projectori}\ ] ] the radial equation on the gravitino gives a differential equation on the spinor parameter @xmath52 here , the projector condition was used . moreover , one can use the projector condition inside ( [ diffeps ] ) , or take the charge conjugate ( using the majorana condition ) . the two resulting equations are @xmath53 \epsilon_r^{\prime } & = & \frac{i}{2}a_r^b \epsilon_r \pm \frac12 { \rm e}^{k/2 } |w| \epsilon_r , \label{majorana } \end{aligned}\ ] ] whose consistency implies @xmath54 the solution is given in terms of an arbitrary constant left - handed spinor parameter @xmath55 ( hence the 1/2 supersymmetry preserved ) : @xmath56 the bps equation ( [ bpsi1 ] ) has been used to express the integration over the superpotential in terms of the warp factor and ( [ bpsextra ] ) for the integration over @xmath57 . in the last formula we have used the definition of the charged conjugate spinor @xmath58 that follows from choosing the charge conjugation matrix @xmath59 , with @xmath60 . in this way the spinor @xmath61 satisfies the relation ( [ proj0 ] ) . finally , using again the projector condition in the modulini equations , one finds the bps equation for the scalar fields @xmath62 we can now also remove the dependence on the phase @xmath63 , by using the holomorphicity of the superpotential : @xmath64 this implies that the bps equations for the scalars can take the form : @xmath65 summarizing , the supersymmetry conditions that have to be satisfied in order to specify the domain wall solutions are @xmath66 z^{i \prime } & = & \mp 2 g^{i\bar \jmath } \partial_{\bar \jmath } |{\cal z}| . \end{array } $ } \label{summary}\ ] ] the other consistency condition we derived from the solution of the supersymmetry equations , namely ( [ bpsextra ] ) , is identically satisfied . this can be seen by using the fact that @xmath63 is the phase of the superpotential , and by equating with ( [ bpsextra ] ) the condition coming from its definition , @xmath67 . the resulting equation is an identity upon using ( [ summary ] ) . domain walls in @xmath3 supergravity were studied before in @xcite in a more restrictive setting , so we compare our results . first there is a change in the signature . this implies that one should change the sign for every upper index and put an @xmath68 for each gamma matrix in the supersymmetry equations . this can be re - absorbed in sending @xmath69 . then there is a difference in the metric . on the solution they have @xmath70 , but also their radial coordinate @xmath71 is related to ours by @xmath72 . also , the decomposition of the superpotential in norm and phase implies that @xmath73 . altogether the equations in @xcite become @xmath74 t^{\prime } & = & -\zeta { \rm e}^{k/2+i \theta } g^{t\overline t } \overline{d_t w } , \label{cv2 } \\[2 mm ] \theta^{\prime } & = & \frac{i}{2 } \left(t^{\prime } \partial_{t } k - \overline t^{\prime } \partial_{\bar t } k\right ) . \label{cv3 } \end{aligned}\ ] ] it is easy to see that these equations are equivalent to the ones presented above , when restricted to a single scalar field flowing . we find it useful to present the domain wall equations in the form of renormalization group equations . for this purpose we will describe the flow not as a function of @xmath41 coordinate but as a function of the warp factor . we multiply eq . ( [ bpsi2a ] ) on @xmath75 and find , using the eq . ( [ bpsi1 ] ) @xmath76 and @xmath77 we will find below that in certain cases the domain wall bps equations in the form ( [ summary ] ) are useful . sometimes we will use equations in the form ( [ renorm1 ] ) , particularly in the case of many moduli participating in the flow and @xmath28 not crossing zero . a careful inspection of the bps conditions ( [ summary ] ) shows that we can associate to the domain wall solutions a monotonic function , which therefore specifies the direction of the flow . as it is known since the analysis of the 5-dimensional domain walls and the interpretation of such solutions as renormalization group flows in the context of the ads / cft correspondence , there is a c - function that is given by the first derivative of the logarithm of the warp factor @xmath78 @xcite . by using the bps equations we easily see that @xmath79 where the last inequality follows from the properties of the scalar metric . there is , however , another interesting quantity that in most cases works as a c - function . this is the square of the covariantly holomorphic superpotential , which is related to the square of the mass of the gravitino at a generic point of the moduli space @xmath80 we can now look at the variations of @xmath81 along the flow . in order to compute it , we actually evaluate @xmath82 and use the bps equation ( [ bpsi2 ] ) . after some easy algebra we get that @xmath83 due to the positive definiteness of the metric of the scalar fields , this expression is clearly either always increasing , or always decreasing along the flow , depending on the sign of the bps equation , unless the flow crosses points where the superpotential vanishes . for these special cases the bps equations change sign as we cross the zeros of the superpotential and therefore @xmath81 is first decreasing until it reaches zero and then starts increasing again . the supersymmetric domain walls studied above are static 1/2 bps configurations of @xmath84 supergravity . in an analogous situation for static 1/2 bps cosmic strings in n=1 supergravity @xcite it was possible to rewrite the gravitational action , including the boundary terms , in the bps form . the action therefore was given by some squares of the bps conditions and total derivative terms . a saturation of the bps bound is equivalent to solving first order differential equations for unbroken supersymmetry . the on shell action therefore is equal , up to a sign , to the total energy of the string . therefore the tension of the string , the energy per unit area , can easily be derived from the bps action . the metric of the cosmic string is @xmath85 and the relation between the @xmath86 on shell and a tension @xmath87 is @xmath88 where @xmath89 and @xmath90 is a fi term in the action . for flat domain walls the metric is @xmath91 . therefore one would expect the following relation between the action and the tension ( the energy per unit of area ) @xmath92 in the case of cosmic strings @xmath93 and @xmath71 have flat metric , therefore the volume of the area is just @xmath94 . however , for our domain walls we have to distinguish the physical volume from coordinate volume and we have to ignore ( divide by ) the physical volume which is @xmath95 . in @xcite the tension of the bps domain walls was calculated using a rather complicated nester construction . the formula for the tension / energy density of the wall between two ads critical points is given for two cases : in one case the superpotential does not vanish between critical points , in the other case it vanishes at some intermediate point : * 2 ads vacua , @xmath96 in between @xmath97 * 2 ads vacua , @xmath98 in between @xmath99 here we show that for domain walls we can put the supergravity action in the standard bps form , namely as the integral of the square of the bps conditions plus boundary terms . we start with the gravitational action supplemented by the gaussian curvature at the boundaries . @xmath100 here @xmath101 is the metric at the boundaries . in our case the boundaries are at @xmath102 surface . therefore @xmath103 and @xmath104 where @xmath105 and @xmath106 and @xmath107 . one starts by plugging ( [ scalari ] ) in the einstein term and using that all the quantities depend only on the radial coordinate . then , we try to re - combine the various terms in the form of the bps equations ( [ bpsi1])([bpsi2a ] ) plus some boundary term . the action ( [ action1 ] ) becomes @xmath108\nonumber \\ & & + \int d^3 x \ , ( a^3)'| _ { r=+\infty } - ( a^3)'| _ { r=-\infty } ) \ .\end{aligned}\ ] ] this can now be recast in the form of bps equations squared plus additional boundary terms as @xmath109 \nonumber \\[2 mm ] & \mp & \int d^3 x \ , dr \left[2(a^3)^\prime |{\rm e}^{k/2}w| + a^3 z^{i\prime } \partial_i ( e^{k/2}w){\rm e}^{-i\theta}+a^3 \bar z^{\bar \imath}\bar \partial_i ( e^{k/2}\bar w){\rm e}^{i\theta}+ a^3 ( e^{k/2})^{\prime } |w|\right ] \label{bpsform0 } \end{aligned}\ ] ] finally , the second line becomes a total derivative by using ( [ holow ] ) , and the total action reads @xmath110 \nonumber \\[2 mm ] & \mp & \int d^3 x \ , dr \frac{d}{dr}\left[a^3\left(2 |{\cal z}|\right)\right ] , \label{bpsformi } \end{aligned}\ ] ] where we recovered the bps equations in the first line and we have a boundary term contribution in the second line . one can define the energy density functional @xmath111 , since we have a static solution , so that @xmath112 . if the superpotential does not vanish between the critical points we find @xmath113\nonumber\\ & & + \int d^3 x ( a^3 2 |{\cal z}| _ { r=+\infty}- a^3 2 |{\cal z}| _ { r=-\infty } ) . \label{bpsform2 } \end{aligned}\ ] ] in case that @xmath114 we have to make a choice of the sign in bps equations such that the tension is positive , as shown in eq . ( [ bpsform2 ] ) . thus when @xmath115 does not vanish between fixed points and the bps equation of motion are satisfied with the upper sign the energy density of the wall is given by @xmath116 note that @xmath117 . so our answer is exactly as in eqs . ( [ 1 ] ) , in agreement with @xcite . it was explained in @xcite that the bps domain walls with this tension are related to cdl bubbles with infinite radius . now we assume that there is a solution of the bps equations where the superpotential vanishes at some point @xmath118 between the ads critical points . the boundary integral in eq . ( [ bpsformi ] ) must be split into two terms since one part of the flow proceeds with one sign in the bps equations and for the other part , after @xmath119 point , the sign is flipped . therefore the answer for the energy density in this case is @xmath120 noting that @xmath117 , we have derived the correct tension as in eq . ( [ 2 ] ) in agreement with @xcite . this case , according to @xcite is not related to cdl tunneling . we would like to conclude this subsection by the observation that our new derivation of the bps domain wall tension follows the pattern discovered for the bps cosmic string in @xcite . we find the derivation using the bps form of the action significantly more elegant than using the nester construction . in this section we are going to give some examples of supersymmetric domain wall solutions for some of the generic models which capture the most important features of the landscape of flux vacua . we start with the simple scenario with just one khler modulus and all the complex structure moduli frozen : the kklt model @xcite . this model has one supersymmetric ads vacuum at a finite point of the volume modulus and a minkowski vacuum at infinite value of the volume modulus . we will solve the bps equations numerically and display the corresponding domain wall . after this simple example we show a more involved setup where also the complex structure moduli and the axion - dilaton are allowed to flow : the @xmath121 models . these include a wide variety of models ( and also the kklt model ) as a special case . the case which we will solve numerically has two different ads critical points at finite distance in the moduli space and three scalars are flowing between the critical points , two of them proportional to each other . finally we focus on a model where the effect of the khler deformations is neglected , but the form of the complex - structure deformations is more involved . the flux vacua in such models are described by a simple set of `` new attractor equations '' @xcite relating the points in the moduli space where the moduli are stabilized by fluxes . these flux vacua attractors have some resemblance as well as some differences with the black hole attractor equations @xcite . we will focus here on a model of a calabi yau threefold obtained as a hypersurface in @xmath122 . this model has two different ads critical points @xcite at finite distance in the moduli space . we will find out how four scalars in this model are flowing from the landau ginsburg ads critical point towards the near conifold region of the moduli space . the kklt model @xcite suggests a way to generate meta - stable de sitter vacua in string theory starting from supersymmetric anti de sitter minima with all moduli stabilized due to fluxes and using non - perturbative effects , such as gaugino condensation and/or d3-instantons . the uplifting of these stabilized ads vacua to ds vacua is possible under certain conditions by the addition of positive energy density sources , like anti - d3 branes . the simplest realization has a single volume modulus @xmath123 . after all the complex structure moduli have been fixed by the fluxes , the superpotential for the volume modulus ( whose khler potential is @xmath124 ) is @xmath125 with @xmath126 , @xmath127 and @xmath128 parameters depending on the details of the setup . the corresponding potential , before uplifting , has one ads supersymmetric critical point at finite volume and an asymptotic minkowski vacuum at infinity of the volume . it is easy to check that we can consistently set the axion @xmath129 to zero , since this is a fixed point for any value of the volume @xmath130 . for the sake of simplicity we will also take the parameters @xmath127 , @xmath128 and @xmath126 to be real ( and positive the first two @xmath131 , @xmath132 , negative the last one @xmath133 ) . the potential for this case and the covariantly holomorphic superpotential @xmath30 are given by fig . [ kkltpot ] as functions of the volume modulus . [ kkltpot ] ( blue upper curve ) and @xmath30 ( red curve below ) as functions of the modulus . one can see that the potential has an ads minimum at @xmath134 and tends to minkowski limit at large @xmath130 . @xmath30 is always negative in the interval between ads and minkowski vacua . potential energy density @xmath21 is shown in units @xmath135 , whereas the covariantly holomorphic superpotential @xmath30 is shown in units @xmath136.,title="fig : " ] one finds that for these parameters during the total flow the covariantly holomorphic superpotential @xmath30 is negative and approaches zero at infinity . we can reduce the problem to a one - dimensional gradient - flow , where the bps equations follow by using @xmath137 we solve numerically the flow equations in the opposite direction ( for technical reasons ) , starting with the ads minimum towards the infinitely far minkowski . for this purpose we have to use ( [ summary ] ) : @xmath138 \phi^\prime ( r ) & = & \partial_\phi |{\cal z}(r)|.\end{aligned}\ ] ] the ads critical point is at @xmath134 , and for values slightly above @xmath139 we get a domain wall solution that drives @xmath140 and @xmath141 . in this case we obviously have just one basin of attraction and the attractor point is the supersymmetric ads vacuum . asymptotically , at large @xmath41 , the value of @xmath130 grows , and @xmath115 becomes @xmath142 we can therefore solve the bps equations above in this limit by @xmath143 it should be noted that @xmath144 which means that the curvature of the space - time ( [ scalari ] ) vanishes asymptotically , as it should be in minkowski space . , the covariantly holomorphic superpotential @xmath30 ( in units @xmath145 ) , the warp factor @xmath128 and the curvature @xmath146 ( in units @xmath147 ) , all as functions of @xmath41 . here @xmath41 is the coordinate of the domain wall configuration given in eq . ( [ typei ] ) ; we show @xmath41 in units @xmath148 . , title="fig:"]0.5 cm , the covariantly holomorphic superpotential @xmath30 ( in units @xmath145 ) , the warp factor @xmath128 and the curvature @xmath146 ( in units @xmath147 ) , all as functions of @xmath41 . here @xmath41 is the coordinate of the domain wall configuration given in eq . ( [ typei ] ) ; we show @xmath41 in units @xmath148 . , title="fig : " ] 0.5 cm , the covariantly holomorphic superpotential @xmath30 ( in units @xmath145 ) , the warp factor @xmath128 and the curvature @xmath146 ( in units @xmath147 ) , all as functions of @xmath41 . here @xmath41 is the coordinate of the domain wall configuration given in eq . ( [ typei ] ) ; we show @xmath41 in units @xmath148 . , title="fig:"]0.5 cm , the covariantly holomorphic superpotential @xmath30 ( in units @xmath145 ) , the warp factor @xmath128 and the curvature @xmath146 ( in units @xmath147 ) , all as functions of @xmath41 . here @xmath41 is the coordinate of the domain wall configuration given in eq . ( [ typei ] ) ; we show @xmath41 in units @xmath148 . , title="fig : " ] in fig . [ kkltabcd ] we plot the wall : first on the top right we have a scalar interpolating between the ads value @xmath134 and infinity . on the top right we plot @xmath30 as the function of wall coordinate @xmath41 . it is always negative but here we see clearly that it takes a constant negative value at ads and starts interpolating towards zero at minkowski vacuum . the next plot on the bottom left shows the warp factor @xmath149 . finally on the right bottom we show the curvature of the domain wall : it is vanishing at large values of modulus in the flat space and grows towards the decreasing values of modulus and sharply drops down to its negative ads value upon reaching the ads vacuum . from this example we learn that in the absence of a barrier between the ads and minkowski vacua there exists a static domain wall where the flow of the volume modulus from the infinite value at minkowski towards the finite value at ads is controlled by 1/2 of unbroken supersymmetry . the tension of this wall is equal to @xmath150 where @xmath151 is the cosmological constant of the ads minimum . the previous example had only one ads vacuum . however , in the landscape of flux compactifications there are also examples with multiple ads vacua and therefore it is interesting to display an example with multiple basins of attraction to different ads vacua and the supersymmetric domain wall solutions interpolating between them . in order to find a workable example , we need an analytic superpotential admitting multiple ads vacua . such an example is provided by various models of toroidal orbifolds analyzed in @xcite . the generic moduli content is given by the axio / dilaton @xmath152 and by the complex - structure moduli @xmath153 and 3 khler moduli @xmath154 , with khler potential @xmath155 for the sake of simplicity we focus on the case of one untwisted complex structure modulus , as for instance in the @xmath156 , @xmath157 orbifolds or in the @xmath158 orbifold with @xmath159 , @xmath160 , @xmath161 or @xmath162 lattice . the superpotential is a polynomial in the complex - structure and dilaton moduli that comes from the fluxes , added by some non - perturbative exponential terms involving the khler - structure moduli . if we consider the cases with just one complex structure modulus , the full untwisted superpotential reads @xcite @xmath163 here the parameters @xmath164 and @xmath165 are related to the fluxes ( they are the coefficients of the real sections of the 3-cycles ) , while the parameters @xmath166 and @xmath167 are to be associated with non - perturbative effects . this potential includes the one - modulus kklt scenario as a special example . we can then look for supersymmetric vacua , satisfying @xmath168 , @xmath169 and @xmath170 . for simplicity , let us consider the case that @xmath171 , @xmath172 and look for vacua where @xmath173 . then , the supersymmetry conditions become @xmath174 b+ d\ , s & = & \frac{1}{u+\bar u } w , \label{duw } \\[2 mm ] - gh\ , { \rm e}^{-h t } & = & \frac{1}{t+\bar t } w. \label{dtw } \end{aligned}\ ] ] a generic solution for @xmath175 of these equations requires that @xmath176 and if we further look for the case where im@xmath177 = im@xmath152 = 0 , then we also obtain that @xmath178 , \label{cond1 } \\[2 mm ] { \rm re}\,t & = & \frac{3c{\rm re}\,s(b + d\ , { \rm re}\,s)}{h(a b- cd \,{\rm re}\,s^2)}. \label{label3 } \end{aligned}\ ] ] when the values of the fluxes are chosen appropriately , one can obtain 2 distinct vacua at values of @xmath179 and @xmath180 . one instance is the choice @xmath181 . the critical points are at @xmath182 and @xmath183 . ( the value of the size of the manifold is tuned by @xmath184 . the smaller @xmath101 , the bigger @xmath93 . increasing @xmath185 on the other hand allows for smaller values of @xmath186 . ) we can then use the bps equations to obtain the interpolating solution between them . having seen how the critical points are obtained , we would like to reduce the problem to a two - dimensional system depending only on @xmath187 , @xmath188 . both critical points lie on the section of the moduli space where all the axions are set to zero . this condition can be kept consistently all along the flow . when the axions are vanishing , @xmath189 and therefore @xmath190 . this condition can be preserved along the flow as @xmath191 if the axions are vanishing . this also implies , since the metric is diagonal , that the real and imaginary parts decouple consistently . given the symmetry of the potential , we can also assume that @xmath173 all along the flow . the bps equations therefore reduce to @xmath192 t^{\prime } & = & \mp 8t^2 \partial_t |{\cal z}|(s , t , u ) , \label{boh } \\[2 mm ] u^{\prime } & = & \mp 8u^2 \partial_u |{\cal z}|(s , t , u ) , \nonumber \end{aligned}\ ] ] and , by using ( [ relus ] ) , one can prove that the differential equations for @xmath193 and @xmath186 are proportional to each other . this means that we can further reduce the problem to the description of the gradient flows for the flow potential @xmath194 , where @xmath195 and @xmath196 . in these variables , the bps equations become @xmath197 \displaystyle \frac{a^{\prime}}{a } & = & \pm |{\cal z}|(\phi_i ) \end{array } \right.\label{bpseff}\ ] ] where the absolute value of the central charge reads @xmath198 notice the double exponentials due to the non - perturbative terms in the khler moduli . given this flow potential , we can look for the special case where we have two distinct critical points , for instance when the parameters are chosen as above : @xmath181 . for these parameter values ( [ z ] ) shows two supersymmetric ads critical points with different values of the cosmological constant and an asymptotically minkowski vacuum . although the bps equations can be written in a closed form , the integration can only be done numerically . in fig . [ fig : contplotw ] we show the contour plot of @xmath30 , where the @xmath199 modulus ( proportional to the complex structure and to the dilaton @xmath195 ) is on the horizontal axis and @xmath200 , proportional to the khler modulus @xmath196 is on the vertical one . and the gradient flow between the two critical points . @xmath201 is everywhere positive between ads critical points , it vanishes only at the asymptotically minkowski vacuum . ] we plot the total potential on fig . [ fig : stupot ] . . ] we can clearly see from the pictures that there are two distinct critical points , and we have plotted the numerical solution interpolating between them . as it is clear from the picture , the two critical points have different behavior . using the nomenclature coming from 5d , one is approached by the flow in an ultra - violet direction ( i.e. the warp factor goes as @xmath202 , for @xmath203 ) , the other in an infra - red ( i.e. the warp factor goes as @xmath204 for @xmath205 ) . an ultra - violet critical point is a minimum of the absolute value of the superpotential ( minimum with positive @xmath28 or maximum with negative @xmath28 ) , an infra - red critical point is a maximum . this implies that there is no need for the superpotential to cross zero . the warp factor indeed shows no critical points , as it always increases along the flow . the superpotential will necessarily cross zero along the flow and therefore the bps equations will change sign only when the interpolation must be done between two infra - red ( two ultra - violet critical points are excluded as the wall should be singular to interpolate between them ) . this is the only way to obtain a smooth domain wall interpolating between them . a similar phenomenon occurred in the realization of the randall sundrum scenario with a thick brane in @xcite . we will have examples of such domain walls in sec . [ sec : subcritical ] . from fig . [ fig : contplotw ] we can also clearly see the two basins of attraction for the ads and dine - seiberg minkowski critical points and the ads repeller ( with a marginal line of attraction separating the two basins ) . this shows that there is one main basin of attraction for the ads vacuum with the larger absolute value of the cosmological constant . there is a line of attraction for the other critical point , which is really a saddle point of the flow potential . finally there is another basin of attraction for the values of the moduli that leads to the decompactification of the space . the size modulus @xmath93 runs to infinity at the same time as the dilaton goes to zero , so we get a decompactification of the space in the weak coupling regime . this example shows that the landscape attractors are different from the black - hole attractors . for the latter , supersymmetry vacua are always minima of the superpotential @xmath28 and therefore one always has clear distinct basins of attractions and there are no repeller - like vacua . moreover , if one is looking at the 5-dimensional case there is always only one basin of attraction for the vector - multiplet moduli . the panorama of the landscape can be further refined by considering a representative example in the class of type ii compactifications on calabi yau threefolds , defined as hypersurfaces in a weighted projective space . when fluxes are active for the rr and ns three - form field strengths on the orientifold of these hypersurfaces , a non - trivial superpotential is induced for the dilaton and complex structure moduli , leading to the many interesting physical properties that have driven a massive research activity ( for a review and bibliography see @xcite ) . these models are particularly relevant even for a single deformation parameter because of the results obtained in @xcite showing that , quite unexpectedly , the density of flux vacua is not uniform in moduli space , but rather it peaks around the conifold singularity , @xmath206 . indeed , upon extensive numerical computations , it has been shown that the conifold region plays the role of attractor " basin and it serves as accumulation region for flux vacua . this supports the analytic predictions made in @xcite . on the other hand , also the landau ginzburg singularity at @xmath207 enjoys very peculiar properties , deriving from it being a fixed point of the modular group . in general , it is the special point in moduli space where the number of vacua with vanishing superpotential @xmath208 and discrete symmetries can be of the same order as the total number of vacua ( when non - zero ) @xcite . for our purposes , it will be convenient for computations because of our need to use perturbative expansions for the cy periods , that are known around this point @xcite . thus , in spite of neglecting the khler structure moduli that in principle would be present in these systems , this case is particularly interesting as a representative of the large amount of possible flux vacua that are making the landscape so rich . another important related feature is that one may encounter multiple attraction basins @xcite . these consist of distinct supersymmetric vacua that can be found within a finite region in moduli space , or `` area code '' , for fixed values of the @xmath209 and @xmath210 fluxes . we thus proceed to identify such a situation and to construct the domain wall solution interpolating between different area codes . as a start , we quickly recall some necessary formulas , while referring for instance to @xcite for the relevant lore and more conventions . one examines in general the @xmath211 complex structure deformations . as usual , one chooses a symplectic basis @xmath212 for the @xmath213 homology cycles ( @xmath214 ) , with dual cohomology elements @xmath215 such that @xmath216 and one assembles into a symplectic vector the periods of the unique holomorphic three - form @xmath217 , @xmath218 the @xmath219 are projective coordinates on the complex structure moduli space and @xmath220 , where @xmath221 is the holomorphic prepotential . the khler potential for the complex - structure and axion - dilaton moduli space is given by @xmath222 where @xmath223 is the axion - dilaton and @xmath224 . the superpotential induced by non - trivial 3-form fluxes reads @xmath225 where @xmath226 and @xmath227 are the integer valued flux components @xmath228 we will take for convenience @xmath229 . let us consider in the following @xmath230 to be the calabi yau locus defined by the equation @xmath231the supersymmetric vacua are found by solving the f flatness " condition , that is a ( khler covariantized ) extremization with respect to @xmath223 and the single complex - structure modulus @xmath232 , @xmath233 leading to the equivalent conditions @xmath234 alternatively , one can solve the flux vacua attractor equations @xcite . one finds that the moduli space of this model presents landau ginzburg , conifold and large complex structure singular points respectively at @xmath207 , @xmath206 and @xmath235 @xcite . the monodromy group , @xmath236 , of the complex structure moduli space has two generators : @xmath127 , which generates phase rotations @xmath237 with @xmath238 around the landau ginzburg point at @xmath239 , and @xmath177 which corresponds to the logarithmic monodromy @xmath240 around the conifold singularity @xmath241 . by itself , @xmath127 generates a @xmath242 subgroup , with an associated fixed point at @xmath239 ; @xmath177 , on the other hand , is of infinite order . the monodromy matrix @xmath127 generates rotations by a root of unity around @xmath243 : @xmath244 and is explicitly given by @xmath245 the periods admit , for @xmath246 , an expansion in a picard fuchs basis @xmath247 where @xmath129 is the @xmath248 root of unity @xmath249 the usual choice for the periods in this basis appropriate for the polynomial m is @xmath250 . then , the periods in the symplectic basis @xmath251 are related to the picard fuchs periods by a linear transformation @xmath252 the matrix of transformation from the picard fuchs to the symplectic basis has rational elements that are given by @xmath253 quite generally , in the symplectic basis the periods have the expansion @xmath254 where the @xmath255 are complex constants and @xmath256 are constant four - vectors with components that are rational linear combinations of powers of @xmath129 . as a further computational tools , we note in passing that for this model the meijer periods ( we find them following method developed in @xcite for quintic in the context of black hole attractors ) are given by the following expression in mathematica notations @xmath257,\\ & u^{-}_{1}(z ) & = { \rm meijerg}\left[\left\{\left\{\frac16,\frac26,\frac46,\frac56\right\},\{\}\right\},\{\{0,0\},\{0,0\}\},z\right],\\ & u^{-}_{2}(z ) & = { \rm meijerg}\left[\left\{\left\{\frac16,\frac26,\frac46,\frac56\right\},\{\}\right\},\{\{0,0,0\},\{0\}\},-z\right],\\ & u^{-}_{3}(z ) & = { \rm meijerg}\left[\left\{\left\{\frac16,\frac26,\frac46,\frac56\right\},\{\}\right\},\{\{0,0,0,0\},\{\}\},z\right ] , \end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath258 are valid for im@xmath259 . the transformation to the picard fuchs basis is given by the matrix @xmath260 so that @xmath261 with @xmath262 for im@xmath263 . we now proceed to specifying the vacua for given values of the fluxes . let us take , as a convenient choice among the solutions of the f - flatness conditions , the flux components to be @xmath264 and @xmath265 the virtue of this set of numbers is that the consequent vacua fall well within the convergence region of the picard fuchs periods , thus making the numerical computations for the flow somewhat easier . it turns out that these fluxes give rise to two vacua : the first vacuum is a maximum at the landau ginzburg point , with @xmath266 the critical value of the potential is @xmath267 . we find the following diagonalized mass matrix for this vacuum @xmath268 the second vacuum is a saddle point close to the conifold point , with @xmath269 and with potential equal to @xmath270 . in this case the diagonalized mass matrix is @xmath271 the interpolating solution going from one vacuum to the other is found by solving the flow equations ( [ renorm1 ] ) , that become @xmath272 where we have used for convenience the variable @xmath273 . the resulting flows are displayed below on the @xmath232 complex plane ( figure [ plot1a ] ) and on the @xmath223 complex plane ( figure [ plot2 ] ) . complex plane . ] complex plane . ] the corresponding flow of the potential @xmath274 as a function of @xmath275 is shown in fig . [ plot3 ] . it shows clearly that there is no barrier . . ] these domain walls are associated to flows that go from a maximum in the landau ginzburg point , towards the conifold which is a saddle point . these are explicit examples of critical points which may be sometimes repellers ( for saddle points or maxima of the potential ) and sometimes attractors , in particular stable attractors in case of minima of the potential . in this case , the flow tends to escape from the lg point towards the conifold . we are confident that these results on interpolating domain walls are common to other one - parametric calabi yau models that have been studied in @xcite and generically have similar distribution of vacua on moduli space . when the vacua are separated by a barrier , one can expect to find an absolute minimum as well as a meta - stable local minimum . this class of models in the stringy landscape was suggested in @xcite : in addition to the ads minimum and to the asymptotically minkowski vacuum , there is also a supersymmetric minkowski minimum at some finite value of the volume modulus . the main motivation for the new class of models with such a minimum was to have more flexibility with the gravitino mass , and to avoid certain cosmological problems specific to the standard kklt scenario . here we will show that the same class of models ( which we will call kl models ) allows two ads minima , both at finite value of the volume modulus . moreover , we will find two types of flows here : depending on the choice of parameters the superpotential may never vanish between the two ads vacua , or it may vanish at some point and therefore change the sign along the flow . this results in several different types of bps domain walls in the kl models . the model has one modulus as in the kklt case , but a more involved superpotential of the racetrack type @xcite . the superpotential is a modification of the kklt model by an additional exponential term @xmath276 this model is a simple instance of multiple basins of attraction . it has one supersymmetric minkowski vacuum at fixed volume , one supersymmetric ads vacuum also at fixed volume and one supersymmetric minkowski asymptotic vacuum at infinite volume as shown in an upper curve in figure [ klpot ] . the plot of the potential clearly shows the barrier between the left minkowski minimum and the ads minimum , the superpotential is negative everywhere away from minkowski vacua . [ h ! ] , blue upper curve , and the covariantly holomorphic superpotential @xmath30 , the red curve below , as the functions of the modulus @xmath130 for the kl model . the potential is shown in units @xmath277 , and @xmath30 is in units @xmath278 . both @xmath21 and @xmath30 have extrema at the same point , which is a reflection of the fact that supersymmetry is unbroken in the minima of @xmath21 . this plot is for @xmath131 , @xmath279 , @xmath280 , @xmath281 and @xmath282.,title="fig : " ] for the choice @xmath131 , @xmath279 , @xmath280 , @xmath281 and @xmath282 , also using once more the definition @xmath283 , the vacua are at @xmath284 , @xmath285 and @xmath286 , with @xmath287 . therefore , one can construct two interpolating domain walls . one is between the ads minimum and the local minkowski minimum , which we will call m@xmath288 . another wall is between the ads minimum and the minkowski extremum at infinity , m@xmath289 . here we study only the domain walls interpolating between m@xmath288 and ads , see figure [ plotx ] . the features of the domain wall between m@xmath289 and ads minimum in this model will be the same as the ones studied in kklt case in section [ sec : kkltmodel ] . and ads . we plot the scalar @xmath130 , @xmath30 ( in units @xmath290 ) , warp factor @xmath128 and the curvature scalar @xmath146 ( in units @xmath277 ) as functions of the coordinate @xmath41 . the curvature @xmath146 is equal to zero in the minkowski vacuum , has a peak at the domain wall , and approaches a constant negative value in the ads vacuum.,title="fig:"]0.5 cm and ads . we plot the scalar @xmath130 , @xmath30 ( in units @xmath290 ) , warp factor @xmath128 and the curvature scalar @xmath146 ( in units @xmath277 ) as functions of the coordinate @xmath41 . the curvature @xmath146 is equal to zero in the minkowski vacuum , has a peak at the domain wall , and approaches a constant negative value in the ads vacuum.,title="fig : " ] 0.7 cm and ads . we plot the scalar @xmath130 , @xmath30 ( in units @xmath290 ) , warp factor @xmath128 and the curvature scalar @xmath146 ( in units @xmath277 ) as functions of the coordinate @xmath41 . the curvature @xmath146 is equal to zero in the minkowski vacuum , has a peak at the domain wall , and approaches a constant negative value in the ads vacuum.,title="fig:"]0.5 cm and ads . we plot the scalar @xmath130 , @xmath30 ( in units @xmath290 ) , warp factor @xmath128 and the curvature scalar @xmath146 ( in units @xmath277 ) as functions of the coordinate @xmath41 . the curvature @xmath146 is equal to zero in the minkowski vacuum , has a peak at the domain wall , and approaches a constant negative value in the ads vacuum.,title="fig : " ] in figure [ plotx ] we plot on the top left the scalar potential @xmath21 , and on the right the covariantly holomorphic superpotential @xmath30 , which vanishes at m@xmath288 and stays negative all the way towards ads . the warp factor on the bottom left starts as a constant at m@xmath288 and interpolates into an exponent of @xmath41 near the ads . finally , the curvature jumps from zero at m@xmath288 to some positive value and falls down to a negative constant at ads . it is interesting that the curvature of the wall grows significantly between zero at m@xmath288 before becoming negative at ads . now we are going to consider the models with two ads minima . this can be done , e.g. , by taking the kl model with a supersymmetric minkowski minimum m@xmath291 , and change any of the parameters of this model . in particular , as one can see from fig.[fig : klppota ] , one can obtain an ads minimum from the minkowski minimum by a slight modification of a single parameter in the previous model : we changed @xmath292 to @xmath293 . using once more the definition @xmath283 , the ads vacua are at @xmath284 , @xmath294 and @xmath295 , with @xmath296 , and @xmath297 for @xmath284 . the potential @xmath21 ( upper curve ) and the covariantly holomorphic superpotential @xmath30 ( lower curve ) for the kl model as function of the modulus are shown in figure [ fig : klppota ] , for the choice @xmath298 , @xmath279 , @xmath280 , @xmath281 and @xmath282 . @xmath30 is always negative . ( upper curve , in units @xmath277 ) and the covariantly holomorphic superpotential @xmath30 ( lower curve , in units @xmath278 ) for the kl model , as function of the modulus . notice that we took @xmath298 instead of @xmath292 , all other parameters being the same as for the potential in fig . [ klpot].,title="fig : " ] we show various features of the kl wall between the two ads vacua in fig . [ fig : plota ] . we plot the scalar and the covariantly holomorphic superpotential , which is a negative constant near the first ads vacuum and interpolates towards another negative value when it approaches another ads vacuum . the warp factor @xmath128 starts as a decreasing exponent and then changes into a faster decreasing exponent of @xmath41 near the second ads . the curvature @xmath146 jumps from some constant negative value near the first ads vacuum , becomes positive near the domain wall , and then falls down to a negative constant near the second ads vacuum . and we plot the scalar @xmath130 and the covariantly holomorphic superpotential @xmath30 ( in units @xmath290 ) , which is always negative , warp factor @xmath128 , and the curvature scalar @xmath146 ( in units @xmath277 ) , as a function of the coordinate @xmath41 . the curvature @xmath146 has a peak at the domain wall , and approaches different constant negative values in two different ads minima.,title="fig:"]0.5 cm and @xmath299 . we plot the scalar @xmath130 and the covariantly holomorphic superpotential @xmath30 ( in units @xmath290 ) , which is always negative , warp factor @xmath128 , and the curvature scalar @xmath146 ( in units @xmath277 ) , as a function of the coordinate @xmath41 . the curvature @xmath146 has a peak at the domain wall , and approaches different constant negative values in two different ads minima.,title="fig : " ] 0.7 cm and @xmath299 . we plot the scalar @xmath130 and the covariantly holomorphic superpotential @xmath30 ( in units @xmath290 ) , which is always negative , warp factor @xmath128 , and the curvature scalar @xmath146 ( in units @xmath277 ) , as a function of the coordinate @xmath41 . the curvature @xmath146 has a peak at the domain wall , and approaches different constant negative values in two different ads minima.,title="fig:"]0.5 cm and @xmath299 . we plot the scalar @xmath130 and the covariantly holomorphic superpotential @xmath30 ( in units @xmath290 ) , which is always negative , warp factor @xmath128 , and the curvature scalar @xmath146 ( in units @xmath277 ) , as a function of the coordinate @xmath41 . the curvature @xmath146 has a peak at the domain wall , and approaches different constant negative values in two different ads minima.,title="fig : " ] the tension of this bps wall is given by eq . ( [ tension1 ] ) . @xmath300 it is critical in a sense explained in @xcite : the tension of such bps brane corresponds to a limit of the cdl bubble solution @xcite with infinite radius . when such bps wall exist there is no tunneling since these supersymmetric walls saturate the cdl bound . we will discuss this issue later when we will study tunneling , see section [ decay ] . in the previous subsection we considered a kl model with two ads minima and the superpotential which did not change sign on the way from one minimum to another . now we will construct a kl model with two ads minima and superpotential vanishing at some point between them ( fig . this can be done by a small deviation of one of the parameters : instead of taking @xmath292 as in original kl model , or @xmath301 , as in the previous subsection with two ads vacua , it is sufficient to take @xmath302 . for example , for the choice @xmath303 , @xmath279 , @xmath280 , @xmath281 and @xmath282 , also using once more the definition @xmath283 , one finds that the ads vacua are at @xmath284 , @xmath304 , with @xmath305 , and at @xmath284 , @xmath306 , with @xmath307 . the covariantly holomorphic superpotential @xmath30 is positive near the ads minimum at @xmath308 . it crosses zero at @xmath309 and becomes negative when approaching the second ads minimum at @xmath306 . it approaches zero at infinite values of the volume modulus . ( upper curve , in units @xmath310 ) and the covariantly holomorphic superpotential @xmath30 ( lower curve , in units @xmath311 ) for the kl model as function of the modulus . @xmath30 is positive at @xmath308 and negative at @xmath312 . here we took @xmath303 instead of @xmath292 , all other parameters being the same as for the potential in fig . [ klpot].,title="fig : " ] the corresponding bps solution is shown in fig . [ plotb ] . we plot on the top left the scalar field @xmath130 , and on the right the covariantly holomorphic superpotential , which changes the sign on the solution . the warp factor on the bottom left starts as a growing exponent near the first ads minimum and changes into a decreasing exponent of @xmath41 near the second minimum . finally , the curvature jumps from some constant negative value near the first ads vacuum , becomes positive near the domain wall , and then falls down to a negative constant near the second ads vacuum . as far as we know , this solution provides the first explicit example of a smooth bps domain walls in @xmath313 with the superpotential vanishing between the critical points . changes the sign on the domain wall solution . we plot the scalar @xmath130 , the covariantly holomorphic superpotential @xmath30 ( in units @xmath290 ) , the warp factor @xmath128 , and the curvature @xmath146 ( in units @xmath277 ) . notice the characteristic peak of the scale factor at the point where @xmath30 changes sign.,title="fig:"]0.5 cm changes the sign on the domain wall solution . we plot the scalar @xmath130 , the covariantly holomorphic superpotential @xmath30 ( in units @xmath290 ) , the warp factor @xmath128 , and the curvature @xmath146 ( in units @xmath277 ) . notice the characteristic peak of the scale factor at the point where @xmath30 changes sign.,title="fig : " ] 0.3 cm changes the sign on the domain wall solution . we plot the scalar @xmath130 , the covariantly holomorphic superpotential @xmath30 ( in units @xmath290 ) , the warp factor @xmath128 , and the curvature @xmath146 ( in units @xmath277 ) . notice the characteristic peak of the scale factor at the point where @xmath30 changes sign.,title="fig : " ] changes the sign on the domain wall solution . we plot the scalar @xmath130 , the covariantly holomorphic superpotential @xmath30 ( in units @xmath290 ) , the warp factor @xmath128 , and the curvature @xmath146 ( in units @xmath277 ) . notice the characteristic peak of the scale factor at the point where @xmath30 changes sign.,title="fig : " ] the tension of this bps wall is given by eq . ( [ tension2 ] ) . @xmath314 it is super - critical in the sense explained in @xcite . the tension of such bps walls exceeds the cdl bound and therefore the tunneling is super - suppressed . in previous sections we studied domains with unbroken supersymmetry separated by static bps domain walls . in our world supersymmetry is broken , but if supersymmetry breaking is not very large as compared to other parameters , one may hope that our domain wall solutions will provide an approximate description of slowly moving near - bps domain walls . just as in the situation with the near - extremal black holes , one may hope the physics of the near - bps walls can be under a much better theoretical control than the physics of generic domain walls . it would be especially interesting to see whether the bps domain walls may play any role in the cosmological context , dividing the universe into different regions separated by static domain walls . however , from the point of view of the friedmann cosmology , the universe with a negative cosmological constant @xmath315 should collapse to a cosmological singularity within a very short time @xmath316 . therefore in the usual cosmological context one can hardly describe coexisting ads domains separated by static domain walls . one of the most interesting applications of the results obtained in the last section is the theory of vacuum decay and bubble formation . it is well known that ds vacua obtained in the kklt construction by uplifting of ads vacua are unstable with respect to the decay to the minkowski vacuum corresponding to infinitely large values of the volume modulus @xmath130 , i.e. to a supersymmetric 10d vacuum @xcite . according to @xcite , the decay probability is given by @xmath317 where @xmath318 is the euclidean action for the tunneling trajectory , and @xmath319 is the euclidean action for the initial metastable configuration @xmath320 . the euclidean action calculated for the metastable vacuum ds solution @xmath321 is given by @xmath322 this action has a simple sign - reversal relation to the entropy of de sitter space @xmath323 : @xmath324 therefore the decay time of the metastable ds vacuum @xmath325 can be represented in the following way : @xmath326 here @xmath327 is the so - called recurrence time . it was shown in @xcite that if the decay of the metastable ds vacua occurs due to the tunneling through the barrier with a positive scalar potential , then @xmath318 is always negative , and therefore the decay always happens during the time shorter than the recurrence time @xmath328 . this result directly applied to the simplest kklt model where the tunneling occurs through the positive barrier separating the metastable ds vacuum and the supersymmetric 10d vacuum . however , the situation with the tunneling to the minima with a negative vacuum density remained less clear ; see refs . @xcite for the recent discussion . in what follows we will examine this issue using the results obtained in the previous section . our consideration will be based on the observation of ref . @xcite that in all cases when @xmath329 does not vanish across the domain wall , the domain wall solutions can be represented as a limiting configuration describing the wall of the cdl bubbles of an infinitely large radius . for such bubbles , the tunneling action is also infinitely large , and the vacuum decay is impossible . in our context , this fact is related to the supersymmetry of the different vacua @xcite , and of the interpolating bps wall solution . however , in realistic situations supersymmetry is broken . for example , in the kklt construction the metastable ds vacuum state appears after the uplifting of a supersymmetric ads vacuum . uplifting can be achieved , e.g. , by adding a @xmath330 brane contribution , which results in a supersymmetry breaking in the ds vacuum . similarly , in the kl model @xcite one must uplift a minkowski vacuum or an ads vacuum to a ds vacuum , thus breaking the supersymmetry . as we will see , this may lead to a relatively rapid decay of the uplifted ds vacuum due to creation of the bubbles describing a collapsing universe with negative vacuum energy corresponding to the ads vacuum . note that in terms of a canonically normalized volume modulus @xmath130 , which we will use hereafter , the @xmath330 brane contribution looks as @xmath331 , where @xmath332 is some constant . ( the canonically normalized field , @xmath333 , is obtained by dividing the field @xmath130 used in the previous section by the factor @xmath334 . ) this contribution rapidly decreases at large @xmath130 . therefore this term may significantly uplift the ads ( or minkowski ) minimum at small values of @xmath130 , but it makes a much smaller effect on the ads minima at large @xmath130 . this suggests that the transitions should typically occur towards larger values of the volume of the compactified space . first of all , consider the kl potential with the supersymmetric minkowski vacuum , and uplift it by a tiny amount to make the vacuum energy there equal to the present cosmological constant , @xmath335 , in planck energy density units . this should make this ds vacuum metastable , and lead to a vacuum decay due to creation of bubbles with negative vacuum energy . . ] to simplify the investigation of its decay , we will consider potentials such that the difference between the depth of the two minima is much smaller than the height of the barrier . an example of such a potential is provided by the kl model with parameters @xmath336 , @xmath337 , @xmath338 , @xmath339 and @xmath340 . for these values of parameters the potential has a supersymmetric minkowski minimum at @xmath341 and an ads minimum at @xmath342 . if one slightly changes the parameters , e.g. takes @xmath343 , then the minkowski minimum becomes an ads minimum . if one uplifts the potential by adding a term @xmath331 , the potential acquires a ds minimum , as shown in fig . [ klthin ] . during all of these changes , the second ads minimum changes only slightly . one expects that the thin wall approximation should be valid for the description of tunneling in such potentials . one part of this condition is automatically satisfied for the near - bps bubbles . indeed , by considering sufficiently small uplifting one can always make such bubbles arbitrarily large without changing the thickness of the wall . however , in order to use the thin - wall approximation as formulated in ref . @xcite , one should also check that the difference between the depth of the two minima is much smaller than the height of the barrier , and that the width of the wall of the cdl bubble remains much smaller than the radius of the bubble even if one turns off the gravitational interaction . we checked numerically that this condition is also satisfied for our potential . having in mind potentials of this type , we will use the thin - wall approximation to investigate the decay of the ds vacuum with the field @xmath308 and vacuum energy density @xmath344 to the state with the field @xmath312 with a negative vacuum energy density @xmath345 . we will be interested in the realistic situation @xmath346 , as illustrated by fig . [ klthin ] . examples of the vacuum decay considered in @xcite described transitions between ds and minkowski space , and decay of the minkowski vacuum . we will use the results obtained by parke @xcite , who generalized the results of @xcite for the tunneling between the states with arbitrary values of @xmath347 in the thin - wall approximation . according to @xcite , the bubble size is given by @xmath348 where @xmath349 is the bubble radius in the thin wall approximation ignoring gravity , @xmath111 is the bubble wall tension , and @xmath350 ( it can be positive or negative ; in our case it is negative ) , and @xmath351 in the thin - wall approximation , the tension of the wall can be approximated by the integral @xmath352^{1/2 } \ .\ ] ] here @xmath353 is the point near @xmath312 where @xmath354 . @xcite uses a slightly different prescription , which is equivalent to ours in the limit when the height of the barrier is much greater than the difference between @xmath347 . ) in the limit when the radius of the cdl bubble becomes infinitely large , the wall tension is known exactly : @xmath355 see @xcite , and also our derivation of this result in sect . 2 , eq . ( [ tension1 ] ) . using the variables @xmath356 one can represent eq . ( [ rad ] ) in the following convenient form : @xmath357 for a particular case of tunneling from minkowski space ( @xmath358 ) , the infinite bubble size regime ( the threshold regime for the tunneling ) corresponds to @xmath359 , @xmath360 , when the denominator vanishes . the tunneling probability is given by @xmath361 , where @xmath362 here the first term is the no - gravity result , and the gravitational correction factor @xmath363 is given by @xcite @xmath364}{x^2(y^2 - 1)(1 + 2xy+x^2)^{\frac{1}{2 } } } \ . \label{gravfactor}\ ] ] this factor also blows up at @xmath359 , @xmath360 , i.e. the tunneling becomes forbidden . now let us uplift the minkowski vacuum , assuming that the ads vacuum at @xmath312 remains approximately at the same height @xmath365 . as we already argued , this is indeed the case if the ads vacuum is at large values of the volume modulus @xmath130 . uplifting changes not only @xmath366 , but also the bubble wall tension @xmath111 . typically uplifting decreases the wall tension , which increases the probability of the tunneling ; a sufficiently large uplifting may remove the wall altogether , see @xcite . any small uplifting makes the tunneling from @xmath308 to @xmath312 possible . in order to study the size of the bubbles and the probability of the tunneling , let us change @xmath367 and @xmath368 by @xmath369 and @xmath370 . in the linear approximation @xmath371 and both depend on the small uplifting @xmath372 . in general , one would expect that the result should depend both on @xmath369 and @xmath370 . however , we find that in the leading approximation in @xmath369 and @xmath370 , the results of the expansion near @xmath359 , @xmath360 depend only on @xmath370 , i.e. they are not sensitive to the small changes of the bubble wall tension . in particular , the denominator in ( [ size ] ) is equal to @xmath373 , where @xmath374 , for @xmath346 . this yields @xmath375 here @xmath376 is the hubble constant in ds space with vacuum energy density @xmath377 . thus , instead of an infinite size bubble , we have a bubble with the size equal to the size of the ds horizon ! now we will perform a similar investigation for the tunneling rate . by considering the function @xmath378 in eq . ( [ gravfactor ] ) and expanding it with respect to @xmath369 and @xmath370 , one finds that in the limit @xmath346 @xmath379 where @xmath380 is the entropy of ds space , @xmath381 this means that the tunneling probability is given by the universal model - independent equation which has a simple geometric interpretation in terms of ds entropy : @xmath382 several comments are in order . first of all , we have found that the decay rate of the vacuum obtained by uplifting of a supersymmetric minkowski minimum does not depend on the tension of the wall , or on the depth of the supersymmetric ads minimum . the only thing we needed to know is that prior to the uplifting these two minima were supersymmetric , which is a generic property of all known flux vacua . an unexpected feature of this result is that the tunneling is suppressed not by a factor @xmath383 , but by a factor @xmath384 . this means that the decay time of an uplifted minkowski vacuum will be shorter than the recurrence time @xmath385 by a huge factor @xmath386 . we will return to the discussion of this fact in section [ sink ] . as we have seen in the previous subsection , a tiny supersymmetry breaking achieved by uplifting of the supersymmetric minkowski vacuum to the ds vacuum with @xmath387 renders this vacuum unstable . now we will extend our results for a more general case . suppose that initially we have two supersymmetric ads vacua , with depth @xmath388 , such that @xmath389 . one can achieve it e.g. by considering the kl potential discussed in the previous section , but taking @xmath390 instead of @xmath391 . tunneling between the two supersymmetric ads minima is forbidden . let us also assume that the deeper minimum is at larger values of the volume modulus , so the kklt uplifting of the minimum @xmath366 to ds space with @xmath387 leaves the depth of the second ads minimum almost unaffected . this is indeed the case in the model discussed above . we will also assume that prior to the uplifting @xmath392 was much greater than the present value of the vacuum energy @xmath393 , so for all practical purposes it is not important whether we uplifted it to a ds state @xmath387 or to the minkowski state with @xmath358 . this subtle difference was important in our previous investigation because the degree of supersymmetry breaking was proportional to @xmath387 . now we are considering a much greater supersymmetry breaking , which is achieved due to a much more significant uplifting , from the initial value of @xmath366 to ( approximately ) zero . in order to simplify notation and avoid mixing the values of @xmath366 before and after the uplifting , we will assume that after the uplifting @xmath358 , and in all subsequent equations we will understand by @xmath366 its value in the ads minimum prior to the uplifting . in order to study the decay rate of the ( nearly ) minkowski vacuum formed by uplifting , one should use , as before , eqs . ( [ coeffb ] ) and ( [ gravfactor ] ) . in minkowski vacuum , one has @xmath360 , so the expression ( [ gravfactor ] ) looks singular , but in fact this singularity is fictitious , which can be easily seen by expanding it near @xmath360 . the outcome of the calculations can be represented in the following form : @xmath394 here @xmath111 is the bubble wall tension for the tunneling in the uplifted potential . the first term in this expression is the probability of the decay of the uplifted minkowski vacuum ignoring gravitational corrections . the second term represents the gravitational suppression of the probability of the tunneling due to the factor @xmath363 . as we see , the probability of the tunneling depends on the wall tension @xmath111 . however , the only part of the expression ( [ tunnads ] ) where this dependence is crucially important is the gravitational suppression term @xmath395 . if after uplifting we would still have two supersymmetric vacua ( minkowski and ads ) , then we would have @xmath396 , the last term in ( [ tunnads ] ) would blow up , and the tunneling would be forbidden . however , prior to the uplifting we had a smaller value of tension , @xmath397 . as we argued before , uplifting tends to decrease the barrier between the two vacua , and therefore it tends to decrease the tension . ( our numerical investigation of the tunneling in the kl model with the potential shown in fig . [ klthin ] is consistent with this expectation . ) if this is the case , the gravitational suppression gradually disappears , and the probability of the tunneling becomes very large . to illustrate various options , let us assume , in the first approximation , that @xmath111 does not change during the uplifting . in this case we find that @xmath398 where @xmath399 . for @xmath13 ( i.e. for @xmath365 of the same order as @xmath366 , prior to the uplifting ) , this expression coincides , up to a numerical coefficient @xmath400 , with the entropy of ds space with the vacuum energy @xmath392 , see eq . ( [ action2a ] ) . the main difference is that for the ds space in which we live now we have @xmath387 , and the factor @xmath401 is incredibly small , @xmath402 . meanwhile the depth of the ads vacuum prior to the uplifting can be a hundred orders of magnitude greater than @xmath393 , and therefore the decay rate of this vacuum after the uplifting can be very large ( see below for a numerical estimate ) . note that if , as we expect , @xmath111 slightly decreases during the uplifting in our model , then @xmath403 will be even smaller , and the decay rate will be even higher . it would be nice to confirm our conclusions by other methods , or to calculate the tunneling probability directly , going beyond the thin - wall approximation . however , our main goal here was to show that generically there is no reason to expect a strong gravitational suppression of the decay of ds vacua if they are obtained by the kklt uplifting of the supersymmetric ads minima . qualitatively , the main argument is as follows : if there are many ads minima in the stringy landscape , and if the tunneling between them is suppressed by supersymmetry , then this suppression disappears after the uplifting and supersymmetry breaking . let us check whether these intuitive expectations match our estimates , eq . ( [ tunndsads ] ) . according to ( [ potential2 ] ) , the scalar potential prior to the uplifting is given by @xmath404 . in the supersymmetric minimum at @xmath308 we have @xmath405 , and @xmath406 . uplifting practically does not change the position of the minimum @xmath308 , and therefore it practically does not change @xmath407 . meanwhile the gravitino mass squared after the uplifting is given by @xmath408 . this means that the depth of the ads minimum before the uplifting is equal to @xmath409 , where @xmath16 is the present value of the gravitino mass @xcite . therefore our result for the tunneling rate of the uplifted ads state ( [ tunndsads ] ) can be represented in the form directly related to the gravitino mass : @xmath410 the scale of supersymmetry breaking in our world is much greater than the energy scale corresponding to the present value of the cosmological constant . for example , if the gravitino mass is @xmath411 gev @xmath412 in planck units , then @xmath413 . therefore eq . ( [ tunndsadsgrav ] ) suggests that a typical decay rate of the ads vacua after their uplifting to the ds state with @xmath387 is greater than @xmath414 . most importantly , this decay rate is greater than @xmath402 by an enormously large factor @xmath415 . this conclusion may have important cosmological implications which we are going to discuss in the next section . but before doing so , let us point out a possible caveat in our discussion . as we already mentioned , if the tunneling between the two vacua should go through the region where @xmath30 changes the sign , then @xmath416 . in this case , if we ignore the decrease of the tension during the uplifting , the tunneling between the two vacua does not occur . one can clearly see it by looking at the gravitational suppression term @xmath395 . this term for @xmath416 is negative , which corresponds to super - suppression of the tunneling @xcite . on the other hand , we expect that in the realistic theories with hundreds of moduli fields there should be many ads minima , some of which will remain ads after the uplifting . therefore it is natural to expect that the decay channels at least to some of these vacua will be open , and will be described by eqs . ( [ tunndsads ] ) , ( [ tunndsadsgrav ] ) . this is the only thing that matters to us , since the total rate of the vacuum decay is determined by the path of the least resistance , i.e. by the channels which maximize the tunneling probability . one of the main reasons to study vacuum transitions which occur on an incredibly large timescale is to find a probability distribution to live in one of the many vacuum states . this issue has a long history involving quantum cosmology , eternal inflation , and statistical properties of the stringy landscape . for a long time , vacuum transitions were studied in the context of inflationary cosmology . the main subject was the possibility of transitions between ds vacuum and minkowski vacuum , or between two ds vacua . one of the most surprising and controversial results was obtained by hawking and moss @xcite . they found that a phase transition from a ds minimum with energy density @xmath366 may occur via a quantum jump to the top of the barrier separating the two vacua , with the height @xmath417 , and by a subsequent classical rolling to the second ds minimum with energy density @xmath418 . the probability of this jump , according to @xcite , was given by @xmath419 initial interpretation of this result was rather obscure because the corresponding instanton seemed to describe a homogeneous tunneling , which was certainly impossible in an infinite ( or exponentially large ) inflationary universe . moreover , from the derivation of this result it was not clear why the tunneling should occur to the top of the potential instead of going directly to the second ds minimum . a proper interpretation of the hawking moss tunneling was achieved only after the development of the stochastic approach to inflation @xcite . one may consider quantum fluctuations of a light scalar field @xmath130 with @xmath420 . during each time interval @xmath421 this scalar field experiences quantum jumps with the wavelength @xmath422 and with a typical amplitude @xmath423 . then the wavelength of these fluctuations grows exponentially . as a result , quantum fluctuations lead to a local change of the amplitude of the field @xmath130 , which looks homogeneous on the horizon scale @xmath424 . from the point of view of a local observer , this process looks like a brownian motion of the homogeneous scalar field . if the potential has a ds minimum at @xmath425 with @xmath426 , then eventually the probability distribution to find the field with the value @xmath130 at a given point becomes time - independent , @xmath427 that is why the probability to gradually climb to the local maximum of the potential at @xmath428 and then fall to another ds minimum is given by eq . ( [ hm ] ) @xcite . note that the distribution @xmath429 is a fraction of the _ comoving _ volume of the universe corresponding to each of the ds vacua . this probability distribution does not take into account different rate of growth of different part of the universe . its interpretation can be understood as follows : at some initial moment one divides the universe into many domains of the same size , assigns one point to each domain , and follows the subsequent distribution @xmath429 of the points where the scalar field takes the value @xmath130 . a necessary condition for the derivation of this result in @xcite was the requirement that @xmath420 . this requirement is violated for all known scalar fields at the present ( post - inflationary ) stage of the evolution of the universe . however , one may try to generalize it for the situations with @xmath430 . following @xcite ( see also @xcite ) , we will look for a probability distribution @xmath431 to find a given _ point _ in a state with the vacuum energy @xmath347 . the main idea is to consider cdl tunneling between two ds vacua , with vacuum energies @xmath366 and @xmath365 , such that @xmath432 , and to study the possibility to tunneling in both directions , from @xmath366 to @xmath365 , or vice versa . the action on the tunneling trajectory , @xmath318 , does not depend on the direction in which the tunneling occurs , but the tunneling probability does depend on it . it is given by @xmath433 on the way up , and by @xmath434 on the way down @xcite . let us assume that the universe is in a stationary state , such that the comoving volume of the parts of the universe going upwards is balanced by the comoving volume of the parts going down . this can be expressed by the detailed balance equation @xmath435 which yields ( compare with eq . ( [ hm ] ) ) @xmath436 independently of the tunneling action @xmath318 . equations ( [ e38a ] ) and ( [ weinb ] ) imply that the fraction of the comoving volume of the universe in a state @xmath130 ( or @xmath312 ) different from the ground state @xmath308 ( which is the state with the lowest , but positive , vacuum energy density ) is proportional to @xmath437 , with the normalization coefficient @xmath438 . the probability distribution @xmath439 coincides with the square of the hartle hawking wave function describing the ground state of the universe @xcite . it has a simple physical meaning : the universe wants to be in the ground state @xmath308 with the lowest possible value of @xmath440 , and the probability of the deviations from the ground state is exponentially suppressed . this probability distribution also has a nice thermodynamic interpretation in terms of ds entropy @xmath441 @xcite : @xmath442 here , as before , @xmath443 . this result and its thermodynamic interpretation played a substantial role in the discussion of the string theory landscape @xcite . unfortunately , there are some problems associated with this result . it suggests that the universe is similar to a pond filled with still water , where all things accumulate at the bottom : the fraction of the comoving volume with the smallest possible vacuum energy must be overwhelmingly large , @xmath444 . for a discussion of paradoxes associated with this conclusion and their possible resolution in the kklt scenario see , e.g. @xcite . investigation of the stationary probability distribution alone does not give us a full picture . for example , the probability distribution ( [ e38a ] ) tells us about the fraction of the comoving volume of the universe in a given state , but it tells us nothing about the evolution towards this state . a partial answer to this question can be given by investigation of the stochastic diffusion equations describing the evolution of the scalar field in the inflationary universe . but now , instead of looking for the most probable outcome of the evolution , one should follow the evolution backwards and look for the initial condition @xmath308 for the trajectories which bring the field to its final destination @xmath130 . in the stationary regime considered above , the corresponding solution looks very similar to ( [ e38a ] ) @xcite : @xmath445 in this equation , however , @xmath308 is not the position of the ground state , but a position of an arbitrary initial point for the diffusion process which eventually brings us to the point @xmath130 . as we see , the probability is maximized by the largest possible value of @xmath446 . interestingly , expression @xmath447 describing the probability of initial conditions coincides with the expression for the square of the tunneling wave function describing creation of a closed ds universe `` from nothing '' @xcite , whereas the second term looks like the square of the hartle - hawking wave function describing the ground state of the universe . in the stationary regime the squares of these two wave functions coexist in the same equation , but they provide answers to different questions . here we should note that it is far from being clear whether the simplest probability distribution which we studied so far should be used in anthropic considerations . indeed , the probability that something happen at a given _ point _ , which is described by the probability distribution in the _ comoving volume _ as discussed above , does not take into account the exponential growth of the _ physical volume _ of the universe , which is the main property of inflationary models . for the discussion of the volume - weighted probability measure , see e.g. @xcite . despite this reservation , it is quite important to study the probability distribution in the comoving volume since its investigation is an essential step in several different attempts to calculate the probabilities in the landscape . here we would like to discuss another problem with the stationary probability distribution described above : this stationary distribution is not very useful during inflation when one can ignore the existence of the lowest ds space with @xmath335 ; in order to obtain a stationary distribution one should take into account the growth of the physical volume of the universe @xcite . moreover , as we are going to show now , this distribution does not necessarily apply to the string theory landscape , simply because in the kklt scenario there are no stable ds vacua that could serve as a ground state of the universe . metastability of ds space in the kklt construction was emphasized in @xcite and in many subsequent papers . here we would like to look at this issue in a more detailed way . stationarity of the probability distribution ( [ weinb2 ] ) was achieved because the lowest ds state did not have any further way to fall . meanwhile , in string theory it is always possible for the metastable ds state to decay . it is important that if it decays by production of the bubbles of 10d minkowski space @xcite , or by production of bubbles containing a collapsing open universe with a negative cosmological constant @xcite , the standard mechanism of return back to the original ds state does not operate any longer . these processes work like sinks for the flow of probability in the landscape . the fraction of the comoving volume in ds vacua will decrease in time . to get a visual understanding of this process , assume that we are looking at the universe in the comoving coordinates , and paint black all of its parts corresponding to one of the two ds states , and paint white the parts in another ds state . then the stationary regime which we discussed so far would imply that eventually the whole universe in average becomes gray , and the level of gray asymptotically will remain constant . suppose now that some parts of the universe may tunnel to a state with a negative cosmological constant . these parts will collapse , so they will not return to the initial ds vacua . if we paint such parts red , then the universe , instead of reaching the constant gray level , eventually will look completely red . this does not mean that eventually all parts of our universe will end up in the sink . due to the exponential expansion of the universe in various ds vacua , the universe eternally rejuvenates , and the total volume of the universe in different ds states continues to grow exponentially @xcite . however , if one wants to find the ratio of the comoving volume of the universe in different states , then instead of solving the detailed balance equation ( [ balance ] ) , one should solve the `` vacuum dynamics '' equations @xmath448 @xmath449 here @xmath450 is the probability current from the lower ds vacuum to the sink , i.e. to a collapsing universe , or to a minkowski vacuum , @xmath451 is the probability current from the upper ds vacuum to the sink , @xmath452 is the probability current from the lower ds vacuum to the upper ds vacuum , and @xmath453 is the probability current from the upper ds vacuum to the lower ds vacuum . combining this all together , gives us the following set of equations for the probability distributions : @xmath454 @xmath455 since the entropy is inversely proportional to the energy density , the entropy of the lower level is higher , @xmath456 . since the tunneling is exponentially suppressed , we have @xmath457 , so we have a hierarchy @xmath458 . we will associate the lower vacuum with our present vacuum state , with @xmath459 , and therefore in what follows we will often have in mind the regime @xmath460 . for simplicity , we will study here the possibility that only the lower vacuum can tunnel to the sink , i.e. we will take the limit @xmath461 and drop the term @xmath462 in eq . . we will analyze more general solutions of equations ( [ v1 ] ) , ( [ v2 ] ) in a separate publication @xcite . on the other hand , we will keep in mind the results of the previous section , where we have found that typically the probability of the decay of a metastable ds vacuum to a sink can be quite high , @xmath463 . therefore we expect that @xmath464 . other mechanisms of a relatively fast vacuum decay have been discussed e.g. in @xcite . the main conclusions to be obtained in this section will be valid for any of these mechanisms . by solving equations ( [ v1 ] ) , ( [ v2 ] ) , one can show that @xmath465 and @xmath466 exponentially decrease in the course of time due to the existence of the sink ( the term @xmath467 ) , but the corresponding physical volume of the universe exponentially grows , and the ratio @xmath468 approaches a stationary regime @xmath469 . in order to find @xmath470 , one can add to each other our equations ( without the term @xmath471 ) . this yields @xmath472 the solution is @xmath473 as for the ( asymptotically ) constant ratio @xmath474 , from eqs . ( [ v1 ] ) , ( [ v3 ] ) one finds @xmath475 one may consider two interesting regimes . suppose first that @xmath476 , i.e. the probability to fall to the sink from the lower vacuum is smaller than the probability of the decay of the upper vacuum . in this case one recovers the previous result , eq . ( [ weinb2 ] ) , which is related to the square of the hartle - hawking wave function : @xmath477 now let us consider an opposite regime , and assume that the decay rate of the uplifted ds vacuum to the sink is relatively large , @xmath478 ( which automatically means that @xmath479 ) . in this case the solution of eq . ( [ ttt ] ) is @xmath480 i.e. one has an inverted probability distribution . this result has a simple interpretation : if the `` thermal exchange '' between the two ds vacua occurs very slowly as compared to the rate of the decay of the lower ds vacuum , then the main fraction of the volume of the ds vacua will be in the state with higher energy density . note that the total fraction of the comoving volume remaining in both of the ds spaces exponentially decreases in time due to the existence of the sink in the lower ds vacuum : @xmath481 this result may have interesting methodological implications . in many recent discussions of the probabilities in the landscape the authors consider the world as seen by an imaginary eternal observer . in the context of the stringy landscape such considerations are problematic , because every would - be eternal observer living in the landscape ( unlike an observer in an eternally existing ds space ) begins his life in a cosmological singularity and ends up in a sink , within the typical time determined by eq . ( [ sinkpower ] ) . moreover , if the sinks occur in the higher ds vacua ( see below ) , then the `` eternal observers '' , or markers , will have a good chance to die well before reaching the thermalized regions produced after inflation . introduction of a finite lifetime of such observers may result in the modification of the probability measure as suggested in @xcite . here we should make an important clarification . the probability distribution @xmath431 describes the fraction of the volume of the universe in a particular ds state . however , when the bubbles of a new phase expand , their interior becomes an empty ds space . if we are usual observers which are born after reheating of the universe , then one may argue that the probability _ to live _ in the bubble @xmath482 is proportional not to the relative volume of the bubbles @xmath483 but to the frequency of their production , i.e. to the ratio of the probability currents @xmath484 @xcite . in the absence of the sink , the fraction of the comoving volume which flows to the lower ds vacuum due to the tunneling from the upper ds vacuum is equal to the fraction of the volume jumping upwards from the lowest vacuum to the higher vacuum . in other words , the two probability currents are exactly equal to each other , j_01 = j_10 , which is the essence of the detailed balance equation ( [ balance ] ) . interestingly , our new results imply that this regime remains approximately valid even in the presence of the sink , under the condition @xmath485 . on the other hand , in the regime described by eq . ( [ ooo ] ) , which occurs if the decay rate to the sink is large enough , @xmath486 , one has a completely different result : @xmath487 thus we have a crucial regime change at the moment when the decay rate of the lower vacuum to the sink starts competing with the decay rate of the upper ds vacuum . now we will compare the probability current to the sink , @xmath488 , and the probability current from the lower ds upwards , @xmath489 . in the absence of the sink , @xmath488 was zero , so every point falling to the lower ds vacuum eventually jumps up to the higher ds vacua . this leads to eternal recycling of ds vacua @xcite , and to the problems discussed in @xcite : in the absence of the sinks ( i.e. in the models with eternal ds space ) each point in the comoving volume would indefinitely wonder between different ds spaces . in this scenario , it would be more probable that our part of the universe was formed as a result of a large quantum fluctuation upwards from an empty ds space , instead of being formed at the stage of inflation . this would leave the homogeneity of our universe , and the origin of perturbations of metric unexplained @xcite . invention of the kklt mechanism demonstrated that all ds vacua in string theory are metastable @xcite , with the lifetime smaller than the recurrence time @xmath490 . this means that we do not have much time for the incredibly improbable jumps upwards to happen @xcite . however , the time necessary for the improbable fluctuations upwards , which could re - create conditions for the existence of life , is also somewhat smaller than the recurrence time @xcite . therefore in order to make sure that the universe does not recycle back from our ds state we would need to double - check that the probability to jump upwards is indeed strongly suppressed as compared to the probability to tunnel to the sink . the estimates of the decay probability of ds vacuum contained in our paper confirm that this is indeed the case . indeed , investigation of the tunneling in several models discussed in our paper suggests that the probability that any given part of ds space with @xmath491 will jump upwards and participate in the process of recycling of the universe is suppressed by a factor of @xmath492 . this can be expressed in terms of the ratio of the probability current from the lower ds vacuum to the upper vacuum @xmath489 with the probability current from the lower ds vacuum to the sink @xmath488 : @xmath493 the last part of this equation follows from the condition @xmath460 , and from the estimate of the decay rate obtained in the previous section , which suggests that in many cases this rate is quite high , @xmath464 . despite this fact , recycling may still be possible , since for @xmath485 one has @xmath494 . on the other hand , for @xmath486 one has @xmath495 . this suggests that in this regime the probability that our universe was created due to the jumps up @xcite becomes exponentially small as compared with the probability that it was formed as a result of inflation . using our results , one can easily check that this is indeed the case if the rate of spontaneous formation of the parts of the universe of our type in the vacuum @xmath496 is smaller than the decay rate of the vacuum @xmath496 to the sink . for wide sinks , this condition can be easily satisfied . this conclusion is closely related to the inversion of the probability distribution for @xmath486 ( wide sink regime ) , see eq . ( [ ooo ] ) . note that inverted probability distributions in the presence of the sink represented by minkowski vacuum naturally appear in the simplest chaotic inflation scenario with the volume - weighted probability measures proposed in @xcite ; see figs . 10 and 12 in @xcite , where the basic theory of the volume - weighted distributions in the inflationary cosmology was developed . with the first of the two volume - weighted probability measures proposed in @xcite the problem of non - inflationary jumps up does not appear at all ; the growth of the total volume of the universe ( and the corresponding fluxes ) is predominantly determined by the exponential expansion of domains with larger vacuum energy and by the subsequent inflation on the way down . in our investigation so far we considered the simplest model with two ds vacua , with the probability leak in the lower ds vacuum . on the other hand , if the probability leak occurs only in the upper ds vacuum , one may ignore the term @xmath497 in eq . ( [ v1 ] ) but keep the term @xmath498 in eq . ( [ v2 ] ) . in this case , for @xmath499 one again recovers the distribution ( [ hheq ] ) , whereas for @xmath500 one finds @xmath501 note that in this regime we have a flat probability distribution , which does not depend on @xmath502 . more generally , one should consider a dynamical equilibrium of a system of many ds , minkowski and ads vacua , where the probability leaks may occur at each level . the fraction of the comoving volume occupied by different metastable vacua in such a universe will be exponentially sensitive to the decay modes for each of these vacua . this makes the investigation of the probabilities in the landscape much more involved , but also much more interesting . previously we were trying to construct the wave function of the ground state of the universe . now we should learn how to study the universe with the holes in the ground . there are two possible approaches to string theory landscape . the first one is based on the calculation of the wave function of the universe , which may describe all branches of the wave function corresponding to all possible vacua . in fact , the first two proposals for the anthropic solution of the cosmological problem in the context of inflationary cosmology were based on the investigation of quantum creation of the universe with various values of scalar fields and fluxes @xcite , or with different types of compactification @xcite . another approach is to consider an inflationary universe consisting of many parts corresponding to all possible vacua @xcite , which allows , in particular , to consider a single universe divided into parts corresponding to all possible values of scalar fields , fluxes and compactifications , and look for the anthropic solution of the cosmological constant problem in this context , see e.g. @xcite . conceptually , this approach is much simpler than the approach based on quantum cosmology , but in order to make it sufficiently general one must find a way to describe the universe consisting of many different parts and describe possible transitions between them . this was the goal of our paper . one of the problems here is that a fully consistent `` landscape action '' with the bulk and brane sources is not known @xcite . however , one can hope that such action can be constructed at least in the case of unbroken supersymmetry following the `` supersymmetry in singular spaces '' proposal @xcite . this strategy was already applied in examples of fully consistent supersymmetric bulk and brane actions in @xcite which include the d8 domain walls with the piece - wise constant @xmath503 flux . in a more general situation with moduli stabilization when various fluxes may jump due to brane sources , the corresponding construction has still to be developed . therefore in the current project we restricted ourselves to studies of the regions of the landscape where stabilization of the moduli is under control and fluxes are fixed . even in this restricted and simplified situation we were able to find multiple vacua and bps domain walls separating them . in the first part of this paper we concentrated on the stringy landscape prior to the uplifting and found many bps domain wall solutions separating different parts of the stringy landscape from each other . we did it using the methods developed earlier in @xcite , and also more recent methods based on the `` new attractor equations '' @xcite . in the second part of the paper we studied what happens with the domain walls after the uplifting . in general , potentials of many moduli before and after uplifting may have many different ads minima of the moduli potential , for the same values of fluxes . before the uplifting , the tunneling between these minima was forbidden by supersymmetry . one could expect , therefore , that after the uplifting the rate of tunneling may be related to the degree of supersymmetry breaking . indeed , in the particular examples that we have studied the probability of the decay of the uplifted vacuum to the remaining ads vacuum was suppressed by a factor @xmath504 , where @xmath505 is the gravitino mass . this decay probability is much greater than @xmath506 . one of the interesting features of the decay of ds vacua to minkowski or ads vacua is that this decay is irreversible . this process is substantially different from the stationary `` thermal exchange '' between various ds vacua . the existence of the channels of the irreversible vacuum decay , which serve as sinks for the flow of probability , is a distinguishing new feature of the stringy landscape which deserves further investigation . as we show in section 6 of our paper , the existence of the sinks strongly affects the probability distributions in string cosmology . it is a pleasure to thank l. alvarez gaum , r. bousso , t. banks , m. cveti , f. denef , b. freivogel , g. horowitz , s. kachru , m. mario , d. martelli , e. silverstein , s. shenker , l. susskind and w. taylor for stimulating conversations . the work of a.c . is supported in part by the european community s marie curie actions , project no . mrtn - ct-2004 - 005104 ( forces universe ) . the work of r.k . , a.l . and a.g . was supported by nsf grant phy-0244728 . the work of a.g . was also supported by nsf grant phy-0097915 , and by doe under contracts de - ac03 - 76sf00515 and rfbr 05 - 01 - 00758 . linde , `` nonsingular regenerating inflationary universe , '' print-82 - 0554 , cambridge university preprint , 1982 , see http://www.stanford.edu/@xmath507alinde/1982.pdf ; a.d . linde , `` the new inflationary universe scenario , '' in : _ the very early universe _ gibbons , s.w . hawking and s.siklos , cambridge university press ( 1983 ) , pp . 205 - 249 , see http://www.stanford.edu/@xmath507alinde/1983.pdf ; a. d. linde , `` eternally existing self - reproducing chaotic inflationary universe , '' phys . lett . b * 175 * , 395 ( 1986 ) . w. lerche , d. lst and a. n. schellekens , `` chiral four - dimensional heterotic strings from selfdual lattices , '' nucl . b * 287 * , 477 ( 1987 ) . r. bousso and j. polchinski , `` quantization of four - form fluxes and dynamical neutralization of the cosmological constant , '' jhep * 0006 * , 006 ( 2000 ) [ arxiv : hep - th/0004134 ] . m. r. douglas , `` the statistics of string / m theory vacua , '' jhep * 0305 * 046 ( 2003 ) [ arxiv : hep - th/0303194 ] ; f. denef and m. r. douglas , `` distributions of flux vacua , '' jhep * 0405 * , 072 ( 2004 ) [ arxiv : hep - th/0404116 ] . m. cvetic and h. h. soleng , `` supergravity domain walls , '' phys . rept . * 282 * , 159 ( 1997 ) [ arxiv : hep - th/9604090 ] ; m. cvetic , s. griffies and s. j. rey , `` nonperturbative stability of supergravity and superstring vacua , '' nucl . b * 389 * , 3 ( 1993 ) [ arxiv : hep - th/9206004 ] ; m. cvetic , s. griffies and s. j. rey , `` static domain walls in n=1 supergravity , '' nucl . b * 381 * , 301 ( 1992 ) [ arxiv : hep - th/9201007 ] ; m. cvetic , s. griffies and h. h. soleng , `` local and global gravitational aspects of domain wall space - times , '' phys . rev . d * 48 * , 2613 ( 1993 ) [ arxiv : gr - qc/9306005 ] . a. ceresole , g. dallagata , r. kallosh and a. van proeyen , `` hypermultiplets , domain walls and supersymmetric attractors , '' phys . d * 64 * , 104006 ( 2001 ) [ arxiv : hep - th/0104056 ] . k. behrndt , g. lopes cardoso and d. lst , `` curved bps domain wall solutions in four - dimensional n = 2 supergravity , '' nucl . b * 607 * , 391 ( 2001 ) [ arxiv : hep - th/0102128 ] ; g. lopes cardoso , g. dallagata and d. lst , `` curved bps domain wall solutions in five - dimensional gauged supergravity , '' jhep * 0107 * ( 2001 ) 026 [ arxiv : hep - th/0104156 ] ; g. lopes cardoso , g. dallagata and d. lst , `` curved bps domain walls and rg flow in five dimensions , '' jhep * 0203 * ( 2002 ) 044 [ arxiv : hep - th/0201270 ] ; k. behrndt and m. cvetic , `` bent bps domain walls of d = 5 n = 2 gauged supergravity coupled to hypermultiplets , '' phys . d * 65 * , 126007 ( 2002 ) [ arxiv : hep - th/0201272 ] . j. louis and s. vaula , `` n=1 domain wall solutions of massive type ii supergravity as generalized geometries , '' arxiv : hep - th/0605063 . d. z. freedman , s. s. gubser , k. pilch and n. p. warner , `` renormalization group flows from holography supersymmetry and a c - theorem , '' adv . * 3 * , 363 ( 1999 ) [ arxiv : hep - th/9904017 ] . r. kallosh and a. linde , `` landscape , the scale of susy breaking , and inflation , '' jhep * 0412 * , 004 ( 2004 ) [ arxiv : hep - th/0411011 ] ; j. j. blanco - pillado , r. kallosh and a. linde , `` supersymmetry and stability of flux vacua , '' jhep * 0605 * , 053 ( 2006 ) [ arxiv : hep - th/0511042 ] . g. t. horowitz and a. strominger , `` counting states of near - extremal black holes , '' phys . lett . * 77 * , 2368 ( 1996 ) [ arxiv : hep - th/9602051 ] ; c. g. . callan and j. m. maldacena , `` d - brane approach to black hole quantum mechanics , '' nucl . b * 472 * , 591 ( 1996 ) [ arxiv : hep - th/9602043 ] ; a. w. peet , `` tasi lectures on black holes in string theory , '' arxiv : hep - th/0008241 . d. z. freedman , c. nunez , m. schnabl and k. skenderis , `` fake supergravity and domain wall stability , '' phys . d * 69 * , 104027 ( 2004 ) [ arxiv : hep - th/0312055 ] ; a. celi , a. ceresole , g. dallagata , a. van proeyen and m. zagermann , `` on the fakeness of fake supergravity , '' phys . d * 71 * , 045009 ( 2005 ) [ arxiv : hep - th/0410126 ] . r. kallosh , `` new attractors , '' jhep * 0512 * , 022 ( 2005 ) [ arxiv : hep - th/0510024 ] . g. dallagata , `` non - kaehler attracting manifolds , '' jhep * 0604 * ( 2006 ) 001 [ arxiv : hep - th/0602045 ] . j. p. hsu , a. maloney and a. tomasiello , `` black hole attractors and pure spinors , '' arxiv : hep - th/0602142 . a. giryavets , `` new attractors and area codes , '' jhep * 0603 * , 020 ( 2006 ) [ arxiv : hep - th/0511215 ] . d. lst , s. reffert , w. schulgin and s. stieberger , `` moduli stabilization in type iib orientifolds . i : orbifold limits , '' arxiv : hep - th/0506090 . k. behrndt and g. dallagata , `` vacua of n = 2 gauged supergravity derived from non - homogenous quaternionic spaces , '' nucl . b * 627 * , 357 ( 2002 ) [ arxiv : hep - th/0112136 ] . m. graa , `` flux compactifications in string theory : a comprehensive review , '' phys . rept . * 423 * , 91 ( 2006 ) [ arxiv : hep - th/0509003 ] . a. giryavets , s. kachru and p. k. tripathy , `` on the taxonomy of flux vacua , '' jhep * 0408 * , 002 ( 2004 ) [ arxiv : hep - th/0404243 ] . s. ashok and m. r. douglas , `` counting flux vacua , '' jhep * 0401 * , 060 ( 2004 ) [ arxiv : hep - th/0307049 ] . o. dewolfe , a. giryavets , s. kachru and w. taylor , `` enumerating flux vacua with enhanced symmetries , '' jhep * 0502 * , 037 ( 2005 ) [ arxiv : hep - th/0411061 ] . a. klemm and s. theisen , `` considerations of one modulus calabi - yau compactifications : picard - fuchs equations , kahler potentials and mirror maps , '' nucl . phys . b * 389 * , 153 ( 1993 ) [ arxiv : hep - th/9205041 ] . f. denef , b. r. greene and m. raugas , `` split attractor flows and the spectrum of bps d - branes on the quintic , '' jhep * 0105 * , 012 ( 2001 ) [ arxiv : hep - th/0101135 ] . r. bousso , b. freivogel and m. lippert , `` probabilities in the landscape : the decay of nearly flat space , '' arxiv : hep - th/0603105 . s. weinberg , `` does gravitation resolve the ambiguity among supersymmetry vacua ? , '' phys . * 48 * ( 1982 ) 1776 . s. j. parke , `` gravity , the decay of the false vacuum and the new inflationary universe scenario , '' phys . b * 121 * , 313 ( 1983 ) . s. w. hawking and i. g. moss , `` supercooled phase transitions in the very early universe , '' phys . b * 110 * , 35 ( 1982 ) . a. a. starobinsky , `` stochastic de sitter ( inflationary ) stage in the early universe , '' in : _ current topics in field theory , quantum gravity and strings _ , lecture notes in physics , eds . de vega and n. sanchez ( springer , heidelberg 1986 ) * 206 * , p. 107 . a. d. linde , `` hard art of the universe creation ( stochastic approach to tunneling and baby universe formation ) , '' nucl . b * 372 * , 421 ( 1992 ) [ arxiv : hep - th/9110037 ] . a. d. linde , d. a. linde and a. mezhlumian , `` from the big bang theory to the theory of a stationary universe , '' phys . d * 49 * , 1783 ( 1994 ) [ arxiv : gr - qc/9306035 ] . k. m. lee and e. j. weinberg , `` decay of the true vacuum in curved space - time , '' phys . d * 36 * , 1088 ( 1987 ) . j. garriga and a. vilenkin , `` recycling universe , '' phys . d * 57 * , 2230 ( 1998 ) [ arxiv : astro - ph/9707292 ] . n. goheer , m. kleban and l. susskind , `` the trouble with de sitter space , '' jhep * 0307 * , 056 ( 2003 ) [ arxiv : hep - th/0212209 ] . a. d. linde , `` quantum creation of the inflationary universe , '' lett . nuovo cim . * 39 * , 401 ( 1984 ) ; a. vilenkin , `` quantum creation of universes , '' phys . d * 30 * , 509 ( 1984 ) . j. garcia - bellido , a. d. linde and d. a. linde , `` fluctuations of the gravitational constant in the inflationary brans - dicke cosmology , '' phys . d * 50 * , 730 ( 1994 ) [ arxiv : astro - ph/9312039 ] ; a. vilenkin , `` predictions from quantum cosmology , '' phys . lett . * 74 * , 846 ( 1995 ) [ arxiv : gr - qc/9406010 ] ; j. garcia - bellido and a. d. linde , `` stationarity of inflation and predictions of quantum cosmology , '' phys . d * 51 * , 429 ( 1995 ) [ arxiv : hep - th/9408023 ] ; j. garcia - bellido and a. d. linde , `` stationary solutions in brans - dicke stochastic inflationary cosmology , '' phys . rev . d * 52 * , 6730 ( 1995 ) [ arxiv : gr - qc/9504022 ] . a. vilenkin , `` making predictions in eternally inflating universe , '' phys . d * 52 * , 3365 ( 1995 ) [ arxiv : gr - qc/9505031 ] ; s. winitzki and a. vilenkin , `` uncertainties of predictions in models of eternal inflation , '' phys . d * 53 * , 4298 ( 1996 ) [ arxiv : gr - qc/9510054 ] ; j. garriga and a. vilenkin , `` a prescription for probabilities in eternal inflation , '' phys . d * 64 * , 023507 ( 2001 ) [ arxiv : gr - qc/0102090 ] ; j. garriga , d. schwartz - perlov , a. vilenkin and s. winitzki , `` probabilities in the inflationary multiverse , '' jcap * 0601 * , 017 ( 2006 ) [ arxiv : hep - th/0509184 ] ; r. easther , e. a. lim and m. r. martin , `` counting pockets with world lines in eternal inflation , '' jcap * 0603 * , 016 ( 2006 ) [ arxiv : astro - ph/0511233 ] ; a. vilenkin , `` probabilities in the landscape , '' arxiv : hep - th/0602264 . a. h. guth , `` the inflationary universe : a possible solution to the horizon and flatness problems , '' phys . d * 23 * , 347 ( 1981 ) . p. j. steinhardt , `` natural inflation , '' in : _ the very early universe _ gibbons , s.w . hawking and s.siklos , cambridge university press , ( 1983 ) . a. r. frey , m. lippert and b. williams , `` the fall of stringy de sitter , '' phys . d * 68 * , 046008 ( 2003 ) [ arxiv : hep - th/0305018 ] . d. green , e. silverstein and d. starr , `` attractor explosions and catalyzed vacuum decay , '' arxiv : hep - th/0605047 . a. d. linde , `` the inflationary universe , '' rept . phys . * 47 * 925 ( 1984 ) . a. d. sakharov , `` cosmological transitions with a change in metric signature , '' sov . phys . jetp * 60 * , 214 ( 1984 ) [ zh . . fiz . * 87 * , 375 ( 1984 ) ] . j. d. brown and c. teitelboim , `` neutralization of the cosmological constant by membrane creation , '' nucl . phys . b * 297 * , 787 ( 1988 ) ; j. d. brown and c. teitelboim , `` dynamical neutralization of the cosmological constant , '' phys . b * 195 * , 177 ( 1987 ) . j. l. feng , j. march - russell , s. sethi and f. wilczek , `` saltatory relaxation of the cosmological constant , '' nucl . b * 602 * , 307 ( 2001 ) [ arxiv : hep - th/0005276 ] . t. banks , m. dine and e. gorbatov , `` is there a string theory landscape ? , '' jhep * 0408 * , 058 ( 2004 ) [ arxiv : hep - th/0309170 ] . f. denef , private discussion . de alwis , `` transitions between flux vacua , '' arxiv : hep - th/0605184 . e. bergshoeff , r. kallosh and a. van proeyen , `` supersymmetry in singular spaces , '' jhep * 0010 * , 033 ( 2000 ) [ arxiv : hep - th/0007044 ] . e. bergshoeff , r. kallosh , t. ortin , d. roest and a. van proeyen , `` new formulations of d = 10 supersymmetry and d8 - o8 domain walls , '' class . grav . * 18 * , 3359 ( 2001 ) [ arxiv : hep - th/0103233 ] ; r. kallosh , s. prokushkin and m. shmakova , `` domain walls with strings attached , '' jhep * 0107 * , 023 ( 2001 ) [ arxiv : hep - th/0107097 ] . Abstract:

Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.

Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered . Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video . Paper: gamma - ray bursts ( grbs ) are the brightest electromagnetic explosions in the universe ( e.g. , @xcite ) . for the short time of their activity , they outshine all other sources in the sky in gamma rays . these energetic explosions originate from cataclysmic cosmic events , whose inner engine " that drives the observed emission is confined to volumes mere tens of kilometers across , as indicated by the duration and variability of gamma - ray emission ( e.g. , @xcite ) . this inner engine is hidden from direct electromagnetic observations , even though the variability of the emission is directly related to the engine s activity . gravitational waves ( gws ) , on the other hand , carry information directly from the inner engine to the observer . with the near completion of advanced gw detectors @xcite , we will soon be able to directly probe the dynamical processes leading to the creation of grbs , which are less ( or not ) accessible via other messengers . the advanced ligo @xcite and virgo @xcite detectors are planned to begin observation in 2015 , albeit initially below design sensitivity , gradually reaching their design sensitivity around the end of the decade @xcite . upon reaching their design sensitivity , the advanced ligo and virgo detectors are expected to be about 10 times more sensitive ( at their most sensitive frequency band around @xmath0hz ) than the initial ligo / virgo detectors . further , advanced detectors will have a wider sensitive frequency band , reaching down to @xmath1hz . this will improve their sensitivity to wide - band sources such as compact binaries . the global gw detector network will further increase its reach in both distance and source direction reconstruction by the addition of further detectors @xcite , such as the japanese kagra ( formerly lcgt ; @xcite ) detector that is under construction , as well as the planned third ligo observatory in india @xcite . there are a number of mechanisms conjectured to result in a grb . potential mechanisms include the formation of a central object surrounded by an accretion disk from the merger of binary neutron stars @xcite or a neutron star and a low - mass black hole @xcite , the collapse of the core of a massive star @xcite , the global reconfiguration of the magnetic fields in magnetized neutron stars @xcite , the accretion - induced collapse of white dwarfs following accretion from a non - degenerate companion @xcite or following the merger of a white dwarf binary @xcite , or even cosmic strings @xcite . identifying the mechanisms behind the creation of individual grbs will be greatly aided by gw detections . this review intends to survey the prospects of gw measurements in understanding the central engines of grbs . while our theoretical view of gw emission mechanisms connected to grbs is rapidly evolving , the main directions , the opportunities and limitations of observational gw astrophysics are becoming clearer . with this review we aim to provide guidance to ( i ) astronomers interested in utilizing the capabilities of gw measurements to complement electromagnetic or neutrino observations in understanding grbs , and ( ii ) gw scientists interested in the open questions in grb astrophysics that can be addressed through gw measurements . compact binary mergers , the likely progenitors of most short grbs ( e.g. , @xcite , although see @xcite for alternative models ) , are one of the primary targets of gw searches ( e.g. , @xcite ) . advanced gw detectors will be able to , among others , measure the properties of the binary @xcite , directly probe the dynamics of the central engine , and correlate the binary s masses and orientation with prompt and delayed electromagnetic counterparts . these observations will constrain the central engine mechanism , provide standard sirens for measuring cosmological parameters @xcite , and constrain the nature of nuclear matter ( see section [ section : cbcphysics ] ) . gw emission from isolated central engines , such as stellar core collapses , accretion induced collapses or magnetars , is typically at higher frequencies and at lower amplitudes than for compact binaries . gw emission depends on the development of varying quadrupole moment , which is highly source and model dependent . the detection of gws from isolated objects would help us understand the internal processes in massive stellar collapses , including the development of differentially rotating protoneutron stars , the nature of nuclear matter , or the creation of massive accretion disks ( sections [ section : collapsarphysics ] , [ section : magnetarphysics ] & [ section : millisecondmagnetars ] ) . for many topics touched upon here , we can refer the interested reader to existing , excellent reviews ; on grb blastwaves @xcite ; on short and long grb observations ; on models of central engines involving core - collapse events @xcite , neutron star mergers @xcite , and isolated neutron stars @xcite ; on gw emission from core - collapse events @xcite and binary mergers @xcite ; on short grb rates @xcite , long grb rates @xcite , and compact object merger rates @xcite . some investigations of isotropic prompt and delayed electromagnetic counterparts have recently been summarized in @xcite ( for short grbs ) . this review is organized as follows . section [ section : emissionprocesses ] outlines gw emission processes from grb progenitors , focusing on the emission scenarios that may produce signals which could be detectable with advanced gw detectors . section [ section : astrophysics ] presents some of the intriguing astrophysical questions that could be answered through the detection of gws from grb progenitors , in some cases in coincidence with other messengers . in section [ section : observationalstrategies ] we review gw observation strategies from single gw to multimessenger searches , also outlining prospects for the advanced detector era . finally , section [ section : conclusion ] we briefly summarizes the presented results and the near future of grb astrophysics with gws . in this section , we outline the main grb progenitor models with an emphasis on their expected gw signature . it should be clear that , depending on the progenitor model , the gw emission from grb progenitors varies widely with respect to predicted signal strength and characteristic frequency . the majority of short - hard grbs are thought to be powered by the merger of ns - ns or ns - bh binaries @xcite . compact binaries are also strong gw sources : the gws produced in the minutes before the merger should be detectable , by second generation instruments ( i.e. , advanced ligo and virgo ) , reliably out to @xmath2mpc for ns - ns binaries , and further for ns - bh systems @xcite . theoretical studies provide detailed information about the binary evolution and the gravitational waveform expected from these systems . moreover , numerical simulations , which include the physics of the ns matter , continue to improve ( see refs . @xcite for reviews ) . here we present an overview of compact binary evolution , which is summarised in fig . [ fig : cbcflowchart ] . at the highest level , there can be four phases : the inspiral phase during which the orbit shrinks due to energy and angular momentum loss via gws ; the merger phase during which dynamical effects and microphysics of the ns become important ; the accretion phase when material stripped from the ns(s ) accretes onto the merged objects ; and the ringdown phase when the merged objects settle down to an unperturbed ( kerr ) bh or a ns . the details vary by ns - ns and ns - bh merger and by mass ( and other parameters ) of the merging objects . the accretion stage is likely essential to the formation of short grbs from binary coalescences , although the formation and evolution of protomagnetars following ns - ns merger has also been proposed as a plausible central engine @xcite . figure [ fig : cbcspectrum ] presents the main features of gw emission in a schematic spectrum of the gw effective amplitude , separately for ns - ns and bh - ns mergers . below we discuss the different stages of the evolution in more detail . early in the evolution of a compact binary system , the two objects are separated by a relatively large distance compared to their radii . the binary elements spiral towards each other by losing angular momentum via the emission of gws . during the early stages of the inspiral , the two compact objects can be approximated as point masses for the purposes of gw emission @xcite . at the late stages of the inspiral , the internal structure of the objects become increasingly important . for example , the tidal deformation of nss in a binary system can ( slightly ) affect the orbital period ( and therefore the gravitational waveform ) in the late inspiral phase @xcite . further , general relativistic spin - spin or spin - orbit coupling can cause the binary s orbital plane to precess , affecting the binary s evolution and gw emission @xcite . nevertheless , the dominant features of the gw signal from the inspiral phase are captured by neglecting the spins and internal structure of the binary elements . as the objects spiral together , their orbital frequency increases producing a gw signal that sweeps upward in frequency . about @xmath3 minutes before merger , the gw from the inspiral of a ns - ns binary begins to sweep upward from @xmath1hz through the band of earth - based gw interferometers . the effective amplitude @xmath4 of the gw signal from a binary system decreases as @xmath5 @xcite , up to a mass - dependent cutoff frequency @xmath6khz @xcite . the frequency ranges @xmath7khz and @xmath8khz are traditionally considered the inspiral and early merger phases , respectively . for @xmath9 the merger retains a binary - like structure and consequently emits relatively strong gws @xcite . advanced detectors will be able to detect a ns - ns inspiral up to @xmath10mpc , while ns - bh inspirals will be detectable up to @xmath11mpc @xcite ( the distances are given for untriggered searches , with optimal source orientation and direction ; for further details see section [ section : allsky ] ) . the effective survey volume determined by averaging over sky location and inclination of the sources is @xmath12 @xcite . using the current best - guess rates of mergers , this gives tens of ns - ns and a few ns - bh binaries detected with advanced detectors each year @xcite . additional advanced detectors , such as kagra @xcite or ligo india @xcite , can significantly increase this range @xcite . third generation detectors are expected to reach an order of magnitude farther than advanced detectors , i.e. to several gpc , and hence will be able to observe tens of thousands of events a year ( e.g. , @xcite ) . depending on the binary system , the merger can progress in multiple distinct directions with qualitatively different gw and gamma - ray emission . the formation of a massive accretion disk is probably crucial to the generation of a grb from binary mergers @xcite . accretion disks can be created via the tidal disruption of a ns at some point during the merger @xcite . alternatively , for ns - ns mergers , material with centrifugal support can be left outside the newly formed bh . whether an accretion disk is formed or not depends on the binary properties ( mass , spin , etc . ) , as well as the ns equation of state ( eos ) . a disk mass of @xmath13m@xmath14 , where m@xmath14 is the mass of the sun , is probably sufficient to supply the energy for the creation of a short grb @xcite . in a recent comparison between numerical simulations and observation , giacomazzo et al . @xcite found that the observed emission of short grbs implies torus masses @xmath15m@xmath14 , which favors high - mass " ns - ns mergers ( @xmath16m@xmath14 ) . further , they find that bh - ns mergers , while can not be excluded , would require a very rapidly spinning bh ( with spin @xmath17 ) . here we list the possible outcomes of the merger and outline the scenarios that can lead to them . 1 . * bh with no accretion disk * for bh - ns binaries , if the radius of the innermost stable circular orbit ( isco ) is greater than the tidal disruption radius , the ns plunges into the bh before it could be tidally disrupted , resulting in a bh with no accretion disk . this will be the case for binaries with relatively high bh : ns mass ratio ( @xmath18 ) @xcite . this ratio strongly depends on the bh spin ( due to the change in the location of the isco ) and the ns eos @xcite . + for ns - ns binaries with equal masses , if the binary mass exceeds a threshold @xmath19 , the nss will promptly collapse to a bh upon merger @xcite , leaving essentially no accretion disk behind @xcite . @xmath19 depends on the ns eos . kiuchi et al . @xcite found that a bh is promptly formed if total mass of the binary system is @xmath20m@xmath14 . + in this scenario no accretion - powered grb will be produced , although there are possible channels through which even such a system can emit electromagnetic radiation @xcite . * bh with accretion disk * for bh - ns binaries with relatively low mass ratio ( @xmath21 ) , the ns will be tidally disrupted before falling into the bh , which leads to the formation of a massive accretion disk @xcite . for spinning bhs , the mass ratio below which disruption occurs is even higher @xcite , and the mass of the formed disk can greatly depend on bh spin and spin - alignment @xcite . prior to tidal disruption , the emitted gw frequency reaches @xmath22khz @xcite . + for ns - ns binaries with unequal ns masses and sufficiently large total mass ( @xmath20m@xmath14 @xcite ) , the less massive ns will be tidally disrupted , followed by the more massive ns s prompt collapse into a bh , leaving a potentially massive accretion disk behind @xcite . + in this scenario , after the merger of a ns - ns binary , if the forming disk features azimuthal variations , gws may be emitted by the material orbiting the central object around a peak amplitude @xmath23khz @xcite . for bh - ns binaries , @xmath24 can be significantly lower , @xmath25inversely proportional to the total mass of the system @xcite . for instance a bh - ns binary with @xmath26m@xmath14 bh mass has @xmath27khz , depending on , e.g. , the bh spin @xcite . + this scenario is a good candidate for the creation of accretion - powered grbs . * hypermassive ns formation * ns - ns binaries with total mass @xmath28m@xmath14 ( this mass threshold depends on the ns eos @xcite ) will not promptly collapse into a bh , but will first form a so - called _ hypermassive _ nsm@xmath14 ) nss , it is possible that the resulting post - merger ns mass can be supported even without differential rotation ( i.e. it is not hypermassive ) . in this case the ns can be long lived ( see , e.g. , @xcite ) . ] @xcite , supported by differential rotation and thermal pressure @xcite . the hypermassive ns eventually collapses into a bh with a delay of @xmath29ms-1s due to ( i ) losing angular momentum via gws or magnetic processes @xcite ( magnetorotational instability @xcite or magnetic winding @xcite ) , ( ii ) its rotation becoming more uniform due to magnetic braking and viscosity @xcite , in which case differential rotational no longer supports the ns , and/or ( iii ) cooling due to , e.g. , neutrino emission , so thermal pressure provides less support against the gravitational pull @xcite . + a rapidly rotating hypermassive ns will assume a ( non - axisymmetric ) ellipsoidal shape @xcite , which is energetically favorable over a spheroid @xcite . such an ellipsoidal hypermassive ns will emit a strong gw signal at twice its ( quasiperiodic ) rotational frequency @xmath30khz @xcite . + hypermassive nss may leave a massive accretion disk behind after collapsing into a bh @xcite . it seems that the outcome depends on the binary mass . as we saw above , for high - mass nss , the merger promptly forms a bh . at the highest masses for which a hypermassive ns is formed , a very short - lived ns is formed , with likely suppressed accretion disk formation @xcite . for lower - mass binaries , the formed hypermassive ns is longer - lived , resulting in stronger gw emission . these lower - mass binaries also result in the formation of a more massive accretion disk . + in this scenario , in which a hypermassive ns is formed , a significant amount of gw energy can be emitted from the hypermassive ns at around its quasiperiodic rotation frequency . quasiperiodic gw emission from a hypermassive ns would be detectable with advanced detectors from @xmath31mpc @xcite , especially because it would be accompanied by an inspiral phase with significantly higher signal - to - noise ratio ( snr ) . this scenario is a good candidate for the creation of grbs , with either bh - torus or protomagnetar central engines . formation of stable ns * if the total mass @xmath32 of a ns - ns binary is below the mass limit @xmath33 of non - rotating nss , or if the merged ns s mass is @xmath34 due to , e.g. , tidal disruption , a stable , long - lived ns can form from the merger . while typical observed ns - ns binary masses @xcite are likely above @xmath35m@xmath14 @xcite , it is plausible that some mergers end up forming a stable ns . accretion disks themselves may contribute to the gw emission of binaries @xcite . bh - torus systems can be unstable to non - axisymmetric perturbations that may give rise to non - axisymmetric torus structure , resulting in gw emission at a few - hundred hz . see also section [ section : accretiondiskinstabilities ] for gw emission from accretion disks . when a bh is formed , or when substantial matter with non - axisymmetric structure ( i.e. , ns or fragmented accretion disk ) falls into the bh , the event horizon of the bh is initially perturbed . subsequently , it quickly approaches the non - perturbed ( kerr ) solution via the emission of gws . this process is called ringdown , with characteristic frequencies of @xmath36khz ( e.g. , @xcite),khz of a particle around a schwarzschild bh of mass @xmath37 at the innermost stable circular orbit ( isco ) . the orbital frequency greatly depends on the bh spin ( e.g. , @xcite for the specific dependence ) . ] given the typical mass of the binary ( @xmath38m@xmath14 ) . at and above @xmath24 , the gw spectrum is qualitatively independent of the properties of the binary ( although quantitatively the characteristic frequency decreases with increasing binary mass ) . it decays exponentially due to the @xmath39 quasinormal mode oscillation of the final black hole @xcite . for solar - mass binaries , gw radiation from the bh ringdown is undetectable with advanced gw interferometers due to its high frequency . we note that bh ringdown can be suppressed or even choked in the presence of intense accretion onto the bh , as is likely the case for unequal - mass ns - ns binaries @xcite . massive stars develop an inert iron core supported by non - thermal degeneracy pressure in their center as the final stage of nuclear fusion . the growing iron core becomes gravitationally unstable upon reaching a mass around the chandrasekhar mass ( @xmath40m@xmath14 ) due to a softening of the eos as the degenerate fermions become relativistic @xcite , collapsing into a ns or a bh . such a collapsing stellar system may result in a supernova explosion ( a core - collapse supernova ) , and/or a grb . the central engine driving grb emission may be an accreting bh ( e.g. , @xcite ) or a rapidly spinning , strongly magnetized protoneutron star ( a _ millisecond proto - magnetar _ ; e.g. , @xcite and references therein ) . the core collapse of a massive star may emit gws through various mechanisms @xcite . below we focus on the mechanisms producing gws that may be sufficiently strong to be detected at distances relevant to grbs , i.e. that may be detectable from @xmath41mpc with 2@xmath42 or @xmath43 generation gw interferometers . a schematic diagram of these emission processes are shown in fig . [ fig : collapsargw ] . for massive stars with initial stellar masses @xmath44m@xmath45m@xmath14 , the collapsing core is expected to form a so - called protoneutron star @xcite . the resulting rotating protoneutron star can be unstable to non - axisymmetric deformations , potentially giving rise to copious gw emission @xcite . the onset of rotational instabilities depends on the rotational rate of the star , which can be conveniently parameterized by @xmath46 , i.e. the ratio of the star s rotational kinetic ( @xmath47 ) and gravitational potential ( @xmath48 ) energy @xcite . the resulting non - axisymmetric structure may be a bar - like @xmath39 mode , giving rise to a characteristic gw emission . higher @xmath49 modes may also arise , albeit they have longer growth time @xcite . while there are still various uncertainties in the evolution and role of rotational instabilities ( e.g. , non - linear mode - coupling effects can severely limit the deformation @xcite , or the role of viscosity and neutrino cooling ) , the emerging picture is that rotational instabilities are likely viable emitters of gws and could play an important role in the future detection and understanding of grb progenitors through their gw signature . the energy potentially available for gw emission is abundant . the rotational energy of a typical ns with 1@xmath50khz rotational frequency is @xmath51m@xmath52c@xmath53 ( e.g. , @xcite ) . even a fraction of this energy , if radiated away in gws , could be detectable at large distances ( @xmath41mpc ) with advanced detectors . the protoneutron star may also accrete supernova fallback material . such an accretion further increases the angular momentum and energy available that may be radiated away via gws @xcite . the amplitude of a gw signal emitted by a rotating bar scales as @xmath54 , where @xmath37 , @xmath55 , @xmath56 and @xmath57 are the mass , radius , gw frequency ( i.e. twice the rotational frequency ) , and distance of the ns , respectively @xcite . the energy radiated away in gws , in the newtonian quadrupole approximation , can be estimated as ( see , e.g. , @xcite ) @xmath58 where @xmath59 is the ellipticity of the bar and @xmath60 is the duration of the presence of the instability . protoneutron stars are subject to different rotational instabilities , the two main categories being dynamical and secular instabilities . a star is dynamically unstable if it is unstable to non - axisymmetric perturbations even in the absence of dissipation ( i.e. if a slightly non - axisymmetric shape that conserves angular momentum is energetically favorable ) . a star is secularly unstable if it is unstable to non - axisymmetric perturbations only if dissipative effects are relevant , i.e. if the change towards a non - axisymmetric shape requires the radiation or redistribution of angular momentum ( see @xcite for interesting historical overviews ) . below we discuss these instabilities further in detail . 1 . * dynamical instabilities * rapidly rotating stars will be subject to dynamical instabilities driven by hydrodynamical and gravitational effects @xcite . dynamical instability is the simplest " form of ns instabilities , since its development is quick ( on the time scale of the rotational period of the ns ) , and does not require dissipation . a uniformly rotating , classical fluid body becomes dynamically unstable at a rotation rate @xmath61 . the maximum rotation of a compact star is limited by mass - shedding to @xmath62 @xcite . ] stability conditions are essentially the same for relativistic stars , for which @xmath63 @xcite . furthermore , differentially rotating stars are subject to non - axisymmetric instabilities even at much slower rotation with @xmath64 . such low-@xmath65 instabilities in differentially rotating protoneutron stars are probably analogous to the papaloizou - pringle instability ( @xcite ; also see section [ section : accretiondiskinstabilities ] ) : the protoneutron star core is surrounded by a fluid rotating at the frequency of a non - axisymmetric mode of the core , hence exciting this mode @xcite . as numerical simulations so far have been too short to capture the long - term behavior of some dynamical instabilities , they are not conclusive in terms of the total energy emitted via gws from dynamical instabilities . nevertheless , gw emission seems to be fast relative to the cooling time of the protoneutron star , or compared to energy loss due to viscosity . consequently , if competing mechanisms that radiate away angular momentum ( e.g. , magnetic fields ) are weak , gws can carry away a significant fraction of the protoneutron star s rotational energy , producing a signal that may be detectable from @xmath66 for narrow - band , circularly polarized gw signals from optimal source direction sensitivity improvement for advanced detectors ; based on the results of @xcite that used only one gw detector multiple detectors could see even farther . ] . the frequency scaling of the distance only applies to @xmath67hz . * secular instabilities * stars with lower rotation rates ( i.e. for which the faster - developing dynamical instabilities are not prevalent ) can be subject to secular ( i.e. dissipation - driven ) non - axisymmetric instabilities @xcite . dissipation can occur via gravitational radiation @xcite or fluid viscosity @xcite . gw emission drives frame - dragging ( so - called chandrasekhar - friedman - schutz ) instabilities of modes that are retrograde with respect to the star but prograde with respect to the observer @xcite . among gw - driven instabilities , fundamental @xmath56-mode bar instabilities have the shortest growth time : @xmath68s for @xmath69 @xcite . in the uniformly rotating approximation of a relativistic star , the protoneutron star becomes unstable to gw - driven @xmath39 @xmath56-mode instabilities for @xmath70 depending on the eos and stellar mass @xcite ( compare with the newtonian limit of @xmath71 @xcite ) . at lower rotation rates , stars become unstable to higher - multipole @xmath56 modes , albeit higher modes have longer growth times @xcite . a recent work of passamonti et al . @xcite indicates that the most unstable @xmath56 modes developing in the aftermath of a supernova explosion may in fact be @xmath72 and 4 modes . + as angular momentum is radiated away through gws ( and potentially other channels ) , the protoneutron star s rotation frequency and therefore the emitted gw frequency decreases , sweeping towards the most sensitive band of ligo - like detectors . some analytical and numerical results indicate that such a gw signal may be detectable at large distances , up to @xmath73mpc with advanced interferometers @xcite . some other recent simulations are also promising , even though they only cover the first few milliseconds after core collapse and therefore can not capture the long - term evolution of the bar mode @xcite . nevertheless , some recent , realistic simulations ( e.g. , @xcite ) predict much smaller detectable range . + rotating protoneutron stars are also unstable to gw - driven _ r - mode _ oscillations ( the restoring force being the coriolis force ) at any ( i.e. arbitrarily low ) rotation rate @xcite . @xmath55 modes are important only if their growth time is less than the damping time of viscous forces . further , @xmath74-mode instability is expected to be saturated at low amplitude due to dissipative effects @xcite , and is suppressed in the presence of magnetic fields @xcite . nevertheless , under favorable conditions , gw signals from protoneutron star @xmath74 modes may be detectable for several years after core collapse @xcite . given such a long duration , the emitted gw signal may be integrated for a measurement of @xmath75yr that would give a detectable signal to distances of @xmath76mpc @xcite ( or to even farther if the protoneutron star is a _ strange quark star _ further calculations ( see @xcite and references therein ) suggest that the saturation ( i.e. maximum ) amplitude of @xmath74-mode instabilities is limited by its non - linear coupling to other inertial modes . 3 . * magnetic distortion * toroidal magnetic fields ( @xmath77 g ) can distort a rotating ns into a prolate shape @xcite . such configuration is unstable to the growth of the angle between the ns s angular momentum and the magnetic axis . this angle increases until the angular momentum and magnetic axis are orthogonal . the resulting configuration is a rotating , non - axisymmetric body that is an efficient emitter of gws @xcite . fast rotating magnetars can also lose spin energy via magnetic dipole radiation and/or magnetized , relativistic winds . nevertheless , observations indicate that such energy losses are not typical ( @xcite and references therein ) , suggesting that gw emission may be relevant in the early phase of newly born magnetars . given that magnetic distortions indeed result in efficient gw emission , dallosso et al . @xcite find that such a gw signal can be detected out to the virgo cluster with advanced detectors . besides their initial rotation , protoneutron stars can accrete material from the infalling matter after core collapse @xcite . it is possible that nss radiate away this angular momentum that they gain from accretion via gws , e.g. , via dynamical and/or secular instabilities discussed above . such gw signal may be detectable to @xmath78mpc with advanced detectors @xcite . upon the core collapse of a massive star ( @xmath79m@xmath80 @xcite ) , a plausible scenario is the formation of a central bh surrounded by an accretion disk @xcite . such a bh - torus system can be the source of copious gw emission if the disk assumes a finite quadrupole structure due to non - axisymmetric instabilities @xcite . the emergence of such a non - axisymmetric structure on the time scales comparable to the lifetime of the accretion disk requires a stellar progenitor with sufficiently high angular momentum . a high rotation rate is also required for the creation of a grb ( e.g. , @xcite ) . below we outline some of the possible scenarios through which non - axisymmetric instabilities in accretion disks may result in strong gw emission , and address whether existing or future gw detectors can probe that signal . as an example to the sensitivity of a gw search to accretion - disk non - axisymmetric instabilities , we consider a 3m@xmath14 bh with a @xmath81m@xmath14 clump in its accretion disk . such a system emits gws similar to an isolated low - mass binary coalescence , and may be seen to a horizon distance ( for definition see section [ section : allsky ] ) @xcite @xmath82 for an advanced detector with optimal source position and orientation ( this distance is reduced by a factor 2.26 for average sky location and orientation ) , where @xmath83 is the so - called _ chirp mass _ ( @xmath84m@xmath14 for the example above ) . 1 . * disk fragmentation via gravitational instability * accretion disks with sufficiently large angular momenta are gravitationally unstable @xcite . a gravitationally unstable disk will fragment if the disk cooling time is sufficiently short ( @xmath85 orbital period ) @xcite . relevant accretion disks cool rapidly , e.g. , via neutrinos or strong winds @xcite , favoring fragmentation , although the emergence of magnetorotational instability ( mri ) in the disk can heat the disk through ohmic dissipation @xcite . the resulting fragmented disk will emit a strong , chirp - like gw signal @xcite . viscosity and gw emission drive the angular momentum loss of the disk . consequently , low disk viscosity favors stronger gw emission , which may be detectable from @xmath73mpc with advanced ligo / virgo @xcite . the gw frequency at its highest snr is probably in the @xmath86hz range , depending on the strength of viscous forces . the duration of gw emission may be similar to that of gamma - ray emission . furthermore , the tidal disruption of fragments in the accretion disk may be behind some of the x - ray flares observed in grb afterglows @xcite . accretion disk fragmentation has been observed in approximate numerical simulations @xcite . it is not clear , however , whether such a fragmentation would occur in more realistic cases as well , unless the pressure support of the star is drastically reduced , e.g. , via neutrino losses @xcite . * non - axisymmetric structure via papaloizou - pringle instability * differentially rotating accretion disks can be subject to global non - axisymmetric instabilities . one such instability , discovered by papaloizou & pringle @xcite , develops in accretion disks in which azimuthal pressure gradients ( due to high internal temperature ) give rise to differential rotation @xcite , i.e. the angular velocity @xmath87 of the disk depends on the radius @xmath55 . in such disks , large - scale spiral pressure waves can emerge with fixed pattern speed @xmath88 . if there is a radius @xmath89 , the so - called corotation radius , at which the pattern speed is equal to the disk rotational rate ( i.e. @xmath90 ) , the wave within @xmath89 will propagate slower than the rotation of the disk , in fact decreasing the mechanical energy of the disk , resulting in a so - called _ negative energy wave _ ( e.g. , @xcite ) . such negative energy wave can interact , at the corotation radius , with the _ positive energy wave _ that develops at @xmath91 . the negative energy wave can increase its amplitude by _ losing _ energy , which in turn can increase the amplitude of the positive energy wave , thus feeding the instability . see , e.g. , @xcite for an expressive description of the phenomenon . + the papaloizou - pringle instability gives rise to an ( @xmath92 ) non - axisymmetric structure on a dynamical time scale ( i.e. over a time period comparable to the rotation period ) . such non - axisymmetric structure can persist for much longer than the dynamical time scale , resulting in strong gw emission . the papaloizou - pringle instability and the resulting non - axisymmetric structure have been observed in 3d relativistic simulations of bh - torus systems @xcite . these simulations indicate that bh - accretion disk systems subject to the papaloizou - pringle instability emit gws in the @xmath86hz frequency range that may be detectable up to @xmath73mpc with advanced ligo / virgo @xcite . strong magnetic fields present in the accretion disk can enhance the instability for thick disks ( and may suppress it for thin disks ) @xcite . nevertheless , we note that the papaloizou - pringle instability was found in simulations for initially axisymmetric tori @xcite . such complete axial symmetry may not develop in compact binary mergers . numerical simulations of compact binary mergers have not yet shown signs of the development of the papaloizou - pringle instability ( e.g. , @xcite ) . * suspended accretion * in order for accretion around a central , rotating bh to continue for the time scales of long grbs , it has been suggested that accretion may be suspended " ( i.e. slowed down or temporarily halted ; e.g. , @xcite ) . such suspended accretion would be achieved through magnetic fields , which transfer some of the rotational energy of the bh to the disk . a fraction of this rotational energy could then be radiated away through gws @xcite . in order to emit gws , the accretion disk needs to lose its axial symmetry , e.g. , through fragmentation . gw radiation from suspended accretion has been suggested to carry away as much as @xmath93m@xmath14c@xmath53 in the sensitive frequency band of ligo / virgo - like interferometers over a duration comparable to the duration of long grbs ( @xmath76s ) @xcite . suspended accretion , nevertheless , requires highly ordered accretion , which may be difficult to achieve due to the development of mri heating or disk turbulence ( e.g. , @xcite ) . simulations to date ( e.g. , @xcite ) have not provided support for suspended accretion , even in the presence of @xmath94 g magnetic fields . in very rapidly rotating stars , infalling matter may fragment even before the formation of a bh - torus system . it has been suggested that , in analogy with observed phenomena in star formation , the collapsing core may fragment and form two or more compact objects @xcite . such fragmentation was observed in relativistic numerical simulations of approximate pre - supernova cores @xcite . such core fragmentation would give rise to strong , characteristic gw emission , similarly to the case of binary mergers . nevertheless , the rotation rate necessary for such a fragmentation seems to be difficult to achieve with current stellar models @xcite . highly magnetized neutron stars ( magnetars ) are thought to be the engine behind soft gamma repeaters ( sgrs ) and anomalous x - ray pulsars ( axps ) @xcite . some magnetars occasionally produce so - called _ giant flares _ that resemble short grbs ( and references therein ) . giant flares are much less energetic than typical short grbs that are at cosmological distances , hence they are only detectable from the milky way or nearby galaxies , up to @xmath95mpc with current instruments . the lack of excess short - grb population from the direction of these galaxies indicates that magnetars may only be responsible for a small sub - population of short grbs @xcite . giant flares are much more common ( with much weaker gamma emission ) than other types of grbs , as indicated by the rate of observed galactic and nearby giant flares . due to their high rate , they may be detectable with gw observatories even though they are much weaker sources of gws than other , extragalactic grbs . giant flares ( as well as sgr activity or abrupt changes in the ns spin period ; @xcite ) are thought to be the result of so - called _ starquakes _ : the tectonic activity ( cracking ) of the ns crust @xcite , which is followed by the reconfiguration of the ns s magnetic fields @xcite . starquakes induce seismic vibrations in the ns , causing the observed quasi - periodic oscillations ( qpos ) in the x - ray tails of giant flares . alternatively , it has been suggested @xcite that qpos can not be driven by oscillations in the ns crust due to the quick ( @xmath75s ) dissipation of the vibration via alfvn waves into the neutron star interior . nevertheless , the similarities between the statistical properties of sgr events and earthquakes may provide further evidence for the crustal origin of sgr events @xcite . ns seismic vibrations result in the emission of gws @xcite , although this emission may be weak @xcite . in the optimal scenario for gw emission , magnetic reconfiguration can liberate @xmath96erg of crustal elastic energy , which is the upper limit for the energy radiated away via gws @xcite . this energy can be even higher if the ns is of strange quark matter @xcite . quasi - periodic oscillations ( qpos ) with various frequencies from @xmath97hz and durations up to @xmath73s have been observed in every giant flare x - ray afterglow so far . some of these qpos may be connected to the seismic modes of the nss . of special interest are qpos around @xmath73hz , which fall into the most sensitive frequency band of ligo / virgo . possible gw emission of @xmath98erg at this frequency would be detectable out to @xmath1kpc with advanced ligo / virgo ( given 10@xmath99 sensitivity improvement compared to initial detectors ) @xcite . it is possible that gws are emitted for a significantly longer time ( days to months ) than the observed electromagnetic qpo @xcite , making longer - term gw searches necessary . a fraction of the energy from magnetic reconfiguration may excite ns fundamental quadrupolar fluid modes ( _ f modes _ ; e.g. , @xcite , although see @xcite ) . if ns @xmath56 modes are excited , they are damped by gws on a very short time scale ( @xmath100ms ; @xcite and references therein ) , which is shorter than most other potential damping mechanisms . therefore , most of the energy in the @xmath56 modes may be radiated away via gws @xcite . ns @xmath56 modes oscillate at @xmath101khz ( for stiff eos ) , not too far from the most sensitive band of advanced ligo / virgo @xcite . given the most extreme case in which @xmath102erg being transferred into @xmath56 modes that oscillate at @xmath75khz , the resulting gw could be detected up to @xmath103mpc with advanced ligo / virgo ( given 10@xmath99 sensitivity improvement compared to initial detectors ) @xcite . stacking " the gw signals from multiple events can extend this distance even farther @xcite . if the excitation energy is comparable to the observed giant flare energy ( @xmath104erg ) and if not all energy is radiated away through gws , only galactic sources would be detectable with advanced gw detectors . furthermore , recent magnetohydrodynamic simulations of magnetized nss indicate that only a small fraction of the released energy is converted to @xmath56 modes , which would make the detection of @xmath56-mode gws less likely @xcite . while the commonly favored model for the central engine behind grbs is a rapidly accreting bh @xcite , there are observational indications @xcite that a fraction of short grbs may originate from highly magnetized , rapidly spinning protoneutron stars , so called _ millisecond protomagnetars _ @xcite . further , outflows driven by such protomagnetars could also lead to the creation of long grbs @xcite . the emergence of a millisecond protomagnetar from various cosmic events is therefore a plausible step in the creation of some grbs . the possibility that some grbs are driven by rapidly spinning protomagnetars opens the door to alternative grb progenitors . while traditionally considered progenitors , i.e. ( i ) the core collapse of massive stars @xcite and ( ii ) ns - ns mergers , can themselves lead to the creation of millisecond protomagnetars , other cosmic events , such as ( iii ) the accretion - induced collapse of white dwarfs @xcite , or the merger of two white dwarfs @xcite , are also plausible progenitors . millisecond protomagnetars may emit a sizable fraction of their rotational energy via gws @xcite , although they may also lose angular momentum via magnetic processes ( e.g. , @xcite ) . fast rotation can result in the emergence of rotational instabilities , especially if the protoneutron star is differentially rotating ( see also section [ section : protoneutronstar ] ) . if a millisecond magnetar indeed drives a grb , it needs to maintain fast rotation for durations comparable to the duration of the grb , potentially allowing sufficient time for rotational instabilities to emerge and result in gw emission . if a significant fraction of the rotational energy ( @xmath51m@xmath52c@xmath53 ; e.g. , @xcite ) is converted into gravitational radiation , the resulting gw signal could be detected to a distance of @xmath105mpc with advanced detectors ( see also section [ section : protoneutronstar ] ) . the rotation rate of millisecond magnetars , and therefore the emitted gw strength and frequency , likely depends on the cosmic event they originate from . accretion - induced collapse of white dwarfs that accrete mass and angular momentum from a non - degenerate companion may produce the most rapidly rotating protomagnetars . due to continued accretion , such white dwarfs will be rapidly rotating upon collapse , resulting in a rapidly rotating protomagnetar , and a strong gw signal . on the other hand , the remnant of a binary white dwarf merger will likely collapse to a magnetar with a significant delay ( @xmath106yr ) , allowing the remnant to lose most of its angular momentum via stellar winds @xcite . binary white dwarf mergers are therefore not likely to be significant sources of gws . this section addresses the question : what can the detection of gw signals add to our understanding of the physics of grbs and their progenitors ? detectable electromagnetic radiation , our main source of information on grbs , is observable only from relatively large distances ( @xmath107 cm ) from the central engine . on the other hand , gws are created right at the central engine , and can convey information about it without being distorted or absorbed by matter on their way to the observer . here we outline some of the questions of interest that could be addressed through observing the gw signature of grbs . 1 . * progenitors of short grbs * as compact binary mergers will be detectable from hundreds of mpc with the advanced ligo - virgo network @xcite , within these distances it will be possible to confirm or rule out compact binaries as grb progenitors . while identification based on electromagnetic signals is not always straightforward @xcite , the detection of gws will be likely essential to unambiguously reveal the nature of the progenitor @xcite . by connecting each measured source with the presence or absence of detectable gw emission , and by exploring the connections between observed electromagnetic counterparts and their binary progenitors , the central engine will be probed in unprecedented ways . for example , observing grbs in coincidence with those binaries for which numerical simulations predict the formation of accretion disks would indicate a connection between accretion disks and grbs . already , analyses of gw data from initial detectors targeting gamma - ray bursts have helped rule out binary mergers as the central engines of selected events @xcite . * population prospects * the populations of short grbs @xcite , as well as compact binaries @xcite , are highly uncertain . the observation of gws from compact binary coalescences could be an effective way of determining the source population . due to the very large field - of - view of gw detectors and the very weak beaming of gw emission , they can be used efficiently to locate practically all sources within their well - determined horizon distance of hundreds of megaparsecs . as source distances can also be determined using gws ( see next subsection ) , the binary coalescence population could also be mapped as a function of redshift , although only with the sensitivity of third - generation gw detectors @xcite . * cosmological parameters * the detection of a binary coalescence gw signal from an observed short grb could be used to determine the distance and redshift of the source @xcite . in fact , the determination can be done independently of the cosmological distance ladder . distances of short grbs can be reconstructed to a @xmath108 precision for @xmath109mpc for ns - ns , and for @xmath110gpc for ns - bh binaries using the advanced ligo - virgo detector network @xcite . reconstructed source distances can then be used to accurately reconstruct the luminosity of short grbs , as well as to test hubble relation @xcite , with one year of observation with advanced detectors potentially allowing for a @xmath111 precision @xcite . further , in combination with measurements of the cosmic microwave background , reconstructed binary merger distances could be used to constrain the dark energy equation of state @xcite . * jet angular structure * the angular structure of relativistic jets from short grbs is poorly constrained @xcite . the rate of binary mergers detected through gws , together with the rate of short grbs for which a binary progenitor can be confirmed with gws , could be used to determine the opening angle of short grbs . + further , the polarization of the inspiral gw signals in principle could be used to characterize the viewing angle of observed grbs @xcite . the gw polarization from a binary inspiral depends on the viewing angle compared to the rotational axis of the binary . towards the rotational axis , the gw signal is circularly polarized , while the polarization becomes elliptical for off - axis observers , eventually becoming linear for observers in the equatorial plane . for sufficiently strong gw signals from the inspiral phase , reconstructing the eccentricity of the gw polarization could provide information on the opening angle . with a large number of measurements , the angular structure of the jet could be mapped as well @xcite . these correlations can be compared to similar constraints that might follow from the detailed multiband light curve of the blastwave @xcite . nevertheless , due to the relatively weak change in gw polarization with angle , the gw polarization may only be identified for large ( @xmath112 ) angular differences , and/or for very high snr ( @xmath113 ) , making the utility of gw polarization limited . * neutron star equation of state * nuclear forces have a profound influence on the structure of nss ( e.g. , @xcite ) . they determine , among other things , the relation between ns mass and radius , or the ns mass limit ( for the rotating and non - rotating cases ) . the eos of matter is poorly constrained at ns densities @xcite . the observation of nss with masses up to @xmath114m@xmath14 @xcite imply a stiff eos ( a ns with soft eos would not be able to support this much mass ) . + the evolution of ns - ns / bh - ns mergers strongly depends on the nss nuclear eos . therefore , the gw signal from binary coalescences can be used to determine / constrain the eos . for instance , if a ns is tidally disrupted during a binary merger , the orbital frequency at which tidal disruption occurs can be used to determine the radius of the ns . this , together with the ns mass reconstructed from the inspiral gravitational waveform @xcite , can be used to constrain the nuclear eos @xcite . + the tidal deformation of nss in a binary system can affect the gravitational waveform even prior to the merger phase . the gw energy spectrum during the last few orbits of a ns - ns binary prior to merger can be used to determine the compactness ratio ( mass / radius ) of the nss @xcite . for these last few orbits of the binary , the gw frequency is at a high but still reasonably sensitive frequency for ligo - type detectors , making the analysis of these last few orbits feasible . + the tidal deformation of a ns in the inspiral phase can be described by one parameter ( the so - called _ love number _ @xcite ) , which is effectively the ratio of the star s induced quadrupole moment to the quadrupole moment of the perturbing tidal gravitational field of the binary companion . flanagan & hinderer @xcite showed that the nuclear eos of nss can be constrained even through the early inspiral phase due to the effect of tidal deformation on the waveform . read et al . @xcite simulated the inspiral phase of ns - ns binaries , showing that the ns eos can be constrained ( the ns radius can be determined to within @xmath115 km precision , which , together with the ns mass , would rule out a part of the eos parameter space ) with advanced gw detectors for a source at a distance of @xmath116mpc . bh - ns mergers can similarly be used to gain information on the ns eos @xcite . + for some ns - ns mergers , collapse to a bh is delayed and a hypermassive ns is formed ( see section [ subsubsection : mergerphase ] ) . during the merger , non - axisymmetric oscillation modes of the hypermassive ns are excited , resulting in gw emission @xcite . the waveform of the resulting gravitational radiation depends on the nuclear eos . consequently , the observed waveform can be used to significantly constrain the eos @xcite . the gw signature of hypermassive - ns oscillations could be detected with snr@xmath117 out to @xmath118mpc ( depending on the eos ) , which may be sufficient to constrain the eos ( at such distances , the source can be confirmed with high accuracy via gws from the inspiral phase ) @xcite . + further , it is possible that the inner part of a ns becomes strange quark matter at high densities . a star made of strange quark matter can be self - bound , a marked difference from hadronic nss that are gravitationally bound @xcite . the gw emission of a strange quark star is substantially different from that of hadronic nss @xcite , hence gws could be used to determine whether ns interiors may contain strange quark matter @xcite . 6 . * magnetic fields in protoneutron stars * magnetic fields are suspected to play a significant role in the origin of short grbs @xcite , and are known to vary between individual pulsars ( e.g. , from their spindown rate @xcite ) . in the inspiral phase , internal magnetic fields in nss ( for realistic field strengths ) have negligible effect on the dynamics of the binary coalescence @xcite . while magnetic tension in the ns can reduce tidal deformation , this effect will be too weak to be detectable with planned gw detectors for realistic pre - merger magnetic strengths ( @xmath119 g ) @xcite . for bh - ns binaries , magnetic fields seem not to alter the dynamics and therefore the gravitational waveform @xcite . + magnetic fields can significantly affect the post - merger behavior of ns - ns binaries , if a hypermassive ns is formed after the merger . upon merger , magnetic fields will be amplified via kelvin - helmholtz instabilities in the shear layer between the merging nss @xcite , or later via differential rotation @xcite . even if magnetic fields are small prior to merger , the amplified fields can be strong enough to affect the evolution of the merger remnant and therefore gw emission . magnetic fields in the hypermassive ns compete with gws in dissipating angular momentum from the hypermassive ns . the decrease of angular momentum eventually results in the delayed collapse " ( @xmath1ms@xmath120s , depending on the mass and the eos ) of the hypermassive ns into a bh ( e.g. , @xcite ) . + by probing the magnetic properties of a large number of nss in binary mergers , one could determine , e.g. , the highest achievable magnetic field frozen in a stationary ns ( @xcite ; e.g. , via the time difference between binary merger and grb ) . * accretion disks * the large - amplitude , quasiperiodic gw emission from instabilities in the accretion disk , probably together with the detection of the earlier inspiral phase from the binary , can be utilized to reconstruct properties of the accretion disk , even if no electromagnetic signal is observed from the source . beyond reconstructing the mass and lifetime of the accretion disk , the development of the instabilities is sensitive to the properties of the accretion disk ( see section [ section : accretiondiskinstabilities ] ) , i.e. the development of the instabilities by itself can already be informative . 1 . * progenitors of long grbs * it is believed that the origin of at least some long grbs are the core collapses of massive stars . this could be confirmed if the gws in coincidence with a long grb progenitor were detected . nevertheless , if no gw emission is detected in coincidence with long grbs , this does not rule out the core - collapse model , although may constrain core - collapse dynamics . if gws are detected in coincidence with a long grb , the internal evolution of a core collapse , which may largely depend on the progenitor , could also be examined . for example , the formation of a protomagnetar or a bh - torus system , or the fragmentation of the massive stellar core may be differentiated via gws . neutron star equation of state * the mass , radius and rotation rate of nss have a profound effect on their potential gw emission through rotational instabilities . detecting the gw signature of these instabilities can be used to constrain the mass - radius relation , rotation , and therefore the eos , of nss ( e.g. , @xcite ) . + further , rotational instabilities in nss result in qualitatively different gw emission for conventional and strange quark nss @xcite . whether a ns is composed of strange quark matter could be inferred from the detected gw signature of the ns s rotational instability . * neutron star internal physics * the evolution of the gravitational waveform from protoneutron star rotational instabilities strongly depends on the nuclear eos at ns densities , as well as the physical parameters of the protoneutron star . differential rotation inside a protoneutron star , temperature ( e.g. , @xcite ) , viscosity and neutrino cooling @xcite may all leave their mark on the evolution of rotational instabilities and the resulting gw emission . further , if a hypermassive ( or supramassive ; see section [ subsubsection : mergerphase ] for their definition ) ns collapses into a bh due to either losing angular momentum or accretion , the rotational frequency prior to collapse provides information on the ns eos @xcite . this rotational frequency may be inferred from the gw signal from the rotating ns @xcite . * accretion physics * because gw emission from massive stellar collapses can be produced by the accretion onto the central object following the collapse , the gw signal therefore can provide insight into accretion physics : ( i ) the mechanisms that transport angular momentum ; ( ii ) instabilities ; and ( iii ) interaction with the black hole . + for bh - torus systems the strength of viscosity ( and possibly the strength of other processes through which the torus loses angular momentum ) can be determined , as these are competing effects for angular momentum loss : the total loss of angular momentum can be inferred from the rate of change of the gw frequency , while the loss through gws can be inferred from the gw signal amplitude . + accretion of matter by the protoneutron star results in extended gw emission due to the intake of angular momentum @xcite . as the time scale and nature of accretion is likely different for accretions from supernova fallback material or material from a companion star , the extended gw signal from rotational instabilities will carry important information on the accretion mechanism . 5 . * magnetic fields in neutron stars * sufficiently strong magnetic fields inside a protoneutron star can be competing with gws in radiating angular momentum away . as ns spindown may be reflected in the gw frequency , measuring the gw amplitude and ns spindown may provide information on the strength and nature of magnetic fields present in the ns . the detection of gws in coincidence with a giant flare from a magnetar could provide information on the processes that lead to flaring in magnetars ( i.e. tectonic activity @xcite or global reconfiguration @xcite vs origin from the magnetosphere @xcite ) . non - detection , nevertheless , does not necessarily rule out these models . upon detection , the frequency of gws from nss excited by , e.g. , starquakes , could be used to infer the ns mass , radius and eos @xcite , or potentially even the strength of magnetic fields inside the ns @xcite . the detection of millisecond magnetars gw signature in coincidence with a grb would confirm their presence and role as the central engine behind some grbs . further , the gw signature of millisecond magnetars may indicate their origin ( e.g. , typical rotation rates may differ for different mechanisms ; see section [ section : millisecondmagnetars ] ) . advanced gw detectors will also be able to determine , out to @xmath121mpc , whether the progenitor of a short grb was a binary merger of a ns with another ns or a bh @xcite . the confirmation of a compact binary merger would rule out the other scenarios in which millisecond magnetars can form , e.g. , white dwarf accretion - induced collapses , or white dwarf binary mergers . the success of detection of gws from grb progenitors depends on the strength of the emitted gws , the sensitivity of gw observatories , as well as the observation strategies used to separate gw signals from the background . the search strategy , e.g. , the use of multiple messengers , can also add to the information one can extract from the source . various transient gw search strategies exist , aiming to find the gw signature of grbs . these strategies differ mainly in their prior assumptions on the gravitational waveform . in the most general case , one can look for so - called gw bursts with minimal assumptions on the waveform , namely defining a maximum signal duration and bandwidth @xcite . these generic burst searches can be modified to include additional information about the source . for instance if one considers an accretion - type emission , circular ( on - axis ) or linear ( off - axis ) polarizations can be required from gw signals , increasing detection sensitivity for signals satisfying these conditions . other model - dependent assumptions include , e.g. , gw signals rapidly evolving characteristic frequency @xcite , such as in the case of compact binary mergers . for compact binary coalescences , the gravitational waveform for a given mass configuration can be accurately calculated for the initial inspiral and final ringdown phases , and to some extent the merger phase @xcite . for such systems with properties in a highly limited parameter space , it is beneficial to use a signal waveform template bank and perform matched filtering based analysis ( e.g. , @xcite ) . below we review the gw search strategies targeting the progenitors of grbs . we indicate the prospects of such searches through presenting projected sensitivity estimates based on observational results with initial detectors . advanced detectors will be @xmath122 more sensitive than initial detectors , the exclusion distances therefore will be @xmath122 greater , corresponding to a @xmath251000-fold improvement in achievable source rate constraints . further , advanced detectors will be sensitive in a wider frequency band . additionally , the advanced detector network will eventually be larger , with the inclusion of kagra and probably ligo india . these improvements will further increase the achievable sensitivity of the advanced detector network @xcite , and will further improve signal parameter reconstruction ( e.g. , source direction ; @xcite ) @xcite . search strategies for gw transients can be divided into four main categories based on their use of other messengers . 1 . * untriggered * searches , in which no information is used from other messengers . the analyses use gw data alone to find astrophysical sources ( e.g. , @xcite ) . externally - triggered * searches , in which one specifically looks for gw signals from sources confirmed via other messengers . for instance one can search for gw signals from the progenitors of detected grbs , using their location , time , and other parameters ( e.g. , @xcite ) . * electromagnetic follow - up * searches , in which gw signal candidates are used to trigger electromagnetic follow - up searches with other telescopes ( e.g. , @xcite ) . * multimessenger * searches , in which one uses ( typically sub - threshold ) signal candidates from multiple observatories of different messengers in a joint search ( e.g. , @xcite ) . in the following we briefly review some of the gw search strategies and past gw searches for grbs , organized along the above categories . untriggered transient searches provide a generic way to identify plausible gw sources without relying on the detection of other messengers . while grbs are highly beamed ( e.g. , @xcite ) , the beaming of gw emission from grb progenitors is weak ( e.g. , @xcite ) . for realistic grb beaming angles , there will likely be more observations of gws from off - axis grb progenitors than gw observations triggered by grbs @xcite . to help quantify the source population detectable with untriggered ( and other ) searches , it is useful to characterize the sensitivity of a gw observatory to a gw source with the so - called _ horizon distance _ @xmath123 . the horizon distance is defined as the distance at which a gw source from optimal orientation ( such that emission towards the earth is the strongest ) and optimal location ( i.e. the most sensitive direction of the gw detector ) is observed with a given snr ( typically chosen to be @xmath124 for untriggered searches ; see also section [ subsubsection : extrig ] ) by a single gw detector . compared to this optimal orientation and location , the orientation and direction - averaged distance at which the source produces the @xmath124 is @xmath125 ( both direction and orientation - averaging contribute a factor @xmath126 ) . for a ns - ns binary with 1.35 m@xmath14 mass for each ns , the projected horizon distance for untriggered searches with advanced detectors ( upon non - detection ) is @xcite @xmath127 where @xmath83 is the so - called chirp mass ( i.e. the horizon distance only depends on this specific combination of the masses of the two compact objects ) . for higher - mass binaries , the horizon distance is somewhat lower than the prediction of eq . [ eq : dh ] ( see @xcite ) . external triggers in gw searches provide additional information and increased search sensitivity for gw analyses @xcite . for example an external grb trigger reduces the temporal and spatial extent in which one has to search for a gw signal @xcite . a detected external trigger can also be used to set constraints on the gw signal . for example a short grb implies that the gw signal is probably a binary merger . chen & holz @xcite estimates that for grb beaming factor @xmath128 ( corresponding to opening angle @xmath129 ) , the number of triggered and untriggered detections of gws from grb progenitors would be comparable . further , even for greater beaming factors ( i.e. smaller opening angles ) , externally triggered searches will enable the detection of some additional , particularly interesting , sources . the extra information in external triggers can be taken into account in the horizon distance by effectively lowering the snr threshold ( i.e. by keeping the false - alarm rate constant ) . the results of chen & holz imply that the sensitivity of externally triggered searches is greater than that of untriggered searches by a factor @xmath130 ( for inspiral searches ; this factor is similar for other types of searches as well ) , i.e. @xmath131 the same sensitivity increase was found by dietz et al . @xcite . while this increased horizon distance means that many more sources fall within observable reach , the actual number of detected sources will be decreased by the beaming of the electromagnetic ( or other ) signal , as well as the sky coverage of the available electromagnetic telescopes . on the other hand , all triggered sources will be detected face - on , while untriggered sources can take any orientation , which adds to the sensitivity of triggered searches compared to untriggered searches ( for binary mergers , the gw amplitude is @xmath126 times greater face - on than averaged over all directions ) . chen & holz @xcite find that the externally - triggered observation rate is a sizable addition , although less than , the untriggered gw observation rate , while kelley et al . @xcite find that grb - triggered searches present no appreciable addition to the total rate @xcite . while both of these studies approximate gw background as purely gaussian , real gw background features a non - gaussian tail that may increase the importance of externally triggered and follow - up searches . previous grb - triggered gw searches include searches for both unmodeled gw bursts and compact binary mergers . for example the short grbs 070201 and 051103 had electromagnetic positions overlapping nearby galaxies ( andromeda and m81 , respectively ) . no binary merger counterpart was found in either case , ruling out a binary progenitor in those galaxies , favoring an sgr model ( a binary progenitor from a more distant galaxy is not ruled out , albeit it is unlikely ) @xcite . nevertheless , it is worth noting that , given their expected rate of occurrence , a binary merger within the distance of andromeda or m81 ( @xmath132mpc ) would be extremely unlikely . for grb - triggered gw searches with initial ligo / virgo , see also , e.g. , @xcite . several gw searches aimed to identify gws in coincidence with sgr flares @xcite . most recently abadie _ et al . _ @xcite used 1279 flares from six magnetars as triggers , aiming to identify gw signals from neutron - star @xmath56-mode ringdowns or other gw - producing mechanisms . the search set constraints on the energy of gw emission from these flares comparable to some giant flares electromagnetic energies , and an order of magnitude below previously existing limits . for a nearby magnetar ( sgr 0501 + 4516 ) located at @xmath133kpc that emitted a large number of flares during the observation period , the obtained upper limit on @xmath56-mode gw emission was @xmath134 erg . the upper limit for gw emission at @xmath135 hz , i.e. within most sensitive frequency band of ligo / virgo , was @xmath136 erg , a promising limit compared to some theoretical upper limits on gw emission from sgrs @xcite . with advanced ligo / virgo , one can expect , beyond more stringent limits on @xmath56-mode emission , constraints on the maximum emissible _ total _ energy from other ns oscillation modes ( we note that these upper limit are constraining only if a substantial fraction of total energy goes into gws , which is debated ; e.g. , @xcite ) . with the rise of a global gw detector network , it became possible to reconstruct the direction of a gw signal candidate , albeit with a relatively large uncertainty . such reconstruction enables the use of gw signal candidates in triggering electromagnetic follow - up observations @xcite . there are various scientific advantages of such a follow - up search : 1 . as electromagnetic observations can not continuously cover the whole sky with high sensitivity , gws can be used to guide these telescopes and point towards the right direction at the right time . often the most interesting and strongest emission from an electromagnetic transient occurs in a short period after its onset . since gw emission is , in many cases , expected to precede the onset of electromagnetic emission , telescopes have the chance to commence follow - up observation in a very early emission stage , or even catch the onset of the electromagnetic event . 3 . gw signal candidates will often have too low significance to be unambiguously identified as extraterrestrial signals . the observation of an electromagnetic follow - up event can enhance the significance of the joint observation , making detection more probable . 4 . similarly to other multimessenger searches , information from the different messengers can enhance the information ( and therefore science ) that one can extract from the source . electromagnetic follow - up searches of gw event candidates is one of the most promising and one of the fastest - evolving areas of gw astrophysics ( see for recent observational development with the ligo - virgo gw detectors ) . see section [ section : emcounterpart ] below for a more detailed description of the potentially detectable electromagnetic counterparts and search strategy . the sensitivity of electromagnetic follow - up searches will differ from the sensitivity of externally triggered searches due to ( i ) the limited reach of electromagnetic transient observations and ( ii ) the finite sky area that is scanned by observatories following up the gw event candidate . taking ( i ) into account in defining the horizon distance , one gets @xmath137 where @xmath138 is the reach of the electromagnetic follow - up observatory . note that @xmath139 refers to on - axis sources , while follow - up observations are the most interesting for off - axis sources ( due to the greater source rate ) . for off - axis directions , gw emission is typically weaker by a factor @xmath126 . the rate of follow - up observations further depends on sky coverage of the follow - up observatories , as well as the beaming of the electromagnetic signal . for a survey of the electromagnetic detectability of gw event candidates , see @xcite . multimessenger analyses generalize the idea behind externally triggered searches by combining information from sub - threshold signal candidates of various messengers into one , more powerful analysis . while in many cases each type of sub - threshold messenger would individually have too low significance to be identified as an astrophysical signal of interest , the combination of individual significances can greatly enhance the analysis potential of identifying astrophysical events ( see section [ chapter : gwhensearch ] for a multimessenger search ) . the _ astrophysical multimessenger observatory network _ ( amon ) initiative @xcite plans to combine sub - threshold triggers of multiple messengers in a low - latency coherent multi - messenger analysis . amon is planned to combine multiple messengers to identify candidates that would be sub - threshold events for individual observatories . the extracted information would be used , besides claiming detection itself , to initiate electromagnetic follow - up observations , which can add to the number of coincidentally observable messengers . the sensitivity of multimessenger searches depends on the false alarm statistics of the different detectors included in the search , as well as the types of messengers . transient messengers with amplitude signatures , such as gws or high - statistics photon signals , will have a relatively well defined horizon distance , beyond which the detection of such a messenger is highly unlikely . other , discrete messengers , such as high - energy neutrinos , will have no such horizon distance , since there is a finite probability of detecting at least one neutrino even from a very distant source with expected signal strength @xmath140 neutrino . these distant sources can significantly contribute to the total number of detectable multimessenger sources , especially in the case in which their presence can be confirmed with other messengers ( see , e.g. , @xcite ) . for such discrete messengers , the gw - multimessenger horizon distance is comparable to that of externally triggered searches : @xmath141 the rate of detected multimessenger sources will be limited by beaming , and the probabilistic nature of observing at least 1 discrete messenger ( e.g. , high - energy neutrino @xcite ) . this section outlines the observable electromagnetic emission of grb progenitors , focusing on counterparts other than gamma rays , and their utility in gw searches . due to the highly beamed emission of most grbs . ] , the majority of grbs are off - axis , i.e. their prompt emission can not be observed from the earth . nevertheless , weaker , off - axis electromagnetic emission from grb progenitors could be detected during gw follow - up observations , if the electromagnetic emission is present beyond a few minutes after the prompt emission ( i.e. the delay between detecting a gw signal candidate and pointing a telescope towards the expected source location ) . most compact object mergers observed by ligo / virgo will not be accompanied by observable grbs due to the small gamma - ray beaming angle . for this reason , the last few years have seen extensive investigation into rapid follow - up search strategies for more isotropic , but more difficult to identify , electromagnetic counterparts . follow - up searches aim to minimize the time between the identification of a gw event candidate and the start time of the observation with electromagnetic telescopes in the required directions . the time delay of sending a request for follow - up search to electromagnetic telescopes after a gw event was @xmath25tens of minutes for initial searches ( mostly due to the manual confirmation of event selection ) . this delay will likely be reduced to @xmath25minutes for searches with advanced detectors @xcite . the uncertainty in direction reconstruction of gw event candidates with the planned advanced detector network will likely be in the @xmath25tens of square degrees range ( e.g. , @xcite ) . with such an uncertainty , telescopes with large fields of view will need to be utilized , focusing on electromagnetic emission that is ongoing for hours - days so the telescopes can scan through the interesting sky area . existing galaxy catalogs can also be used to largely decrease the sky area that needs to be mapped ( see section [ subsection : hostgalaxies ] ) . we note here that , besides gw observations , the observation of the prompt gamma - ray emission itself has a position resolution of a few degrees , i.e. comparable to the resolution of gw observations . afterglow observations are therefore also important for the direction reconstruction of observed grbs . beyond direction reconstruction , grb afterglows also promise to carry important information connected to gw radiation . corsi & mszros @xcite pointed out that the observed x - ray plateau in the afterglow of some grbs may be connected to the formation of a highly magnetized millisecond pulsar that can lose angular momentum through gws during a 10@xmath142s period ( see also @xcite ) . several promising emission models have been identified which predict longer - lived , weakly ( or not at all ) beamed emission that can be detected on a distance scale comparable to the sensitivity range of advanced gw detectors . in the following list of these models , we focus on optical counterparts of compact binary coalescences . for a survey of the detectability of some of these emission models , see , e.g. , @xcite . 1 . * electromagnetic remnants from compact binary mergers * ns - ns and ns - bh mergers can eject energetic ( sub - relativistic or relativistic ) outflows . these energetic outflows can interact with matter in the interstellar medium , creating a long - lasting radio signal @xcite . radio remnants from dynamically ejected sub - relativistic material can appear months to years after the binary merger , and can last for several years @xcite . a deep radio survey can identify these radio remnants out to @xmath143mpc @xcite . mildly / ultra - relativistic outflows may create even brighter radio emission , on the time scale of weeks @xcite . the detectability of the radio transient strongly depends on circum - merger density , and therefore the signal may be lower for binaries that left their galaxy prior to merger . + an interesting case is shocks generated within the nss upon the merger of a ns - ns binary @xcite , which can plausibly drive ultra - relativistic outflows . these shock waves , besides heating the nss , result in shock breakout from the nss surface , driving a nearly omnidirectional , ultra - relativistic outflow @xcite . the outflow decelerates in the ambient medium , resulting in a bright x - ray flare seconds after the merger that could be detectable with , e.g. , swift xrt @xcite . the flare gradually changes to optical and radio as the outflow decelerates , potentially detectable with , e.g. , pan - starrs @xcite and evla @xcite . * macronovae / kilonovae * matter ejected from compact binary encounters may produce electromagnetic optical or near - infrared transients that are suitable for follow - up searches of gw signal candidates @xcite . matter ejected by binary mergers ( tidal tails or accretion disk outflows ; e.g. , @xcite ) , initially at nuclear densities , expands and undergoes r - process nucleosynthesis , producing heavier , radioactive elements . the decay of such elements produces an isotropic emission that lasts for days , named macronova " @xcite or kilonova " @xcite . this is an appealing model , because it suggests that virtually all ligo detected ns - ns or bh - ns mergers would have detectable optical counterparts . however , finding these counterparts in the large gw directional uncertainty region would likely require a combination of powerful survey telescopes and follow - up spectroscopy , as used by palomar transient factory , and pan - starrs , or the future lsst @xcite . 3 . * x - ray / optical afterglow * the relativistic outflow from a grb central engine interacts with matter in the circumburst medium , emitting a long - lasting electromagnetic afterglow in a wide range of frequencies ( e.g. , @xcite ) . at x - ray and optical frequencies ( lasting from minutes to a day ) , afterglow emission is the strongest shortly after the prompt grb in the direction of the relativistic outflow ( i.e. on - axis ) , and rapidly decays afterwards @xcite . on - axis x - ray emission is detectable ( e.g. , with the swift xrt telescope ) over a period of @xmath75day after the prompt burst for source distances out to the horizon distance of gw telescopes @xcite . off - axis x - ray and optical emission , far from the axis of rotation , peaks at a significantly lower flux , making the detection of off - axis x - ray less useful in multimessenger searches @xcite . for radio frequencies around @xmath1ghz , on - axis emission for long grbs peaks at 3 - 6 days in the source rest frame after the prompt burst @xcite , while off - axis emission peaks on a similar time scale . * magnetic interaction between bh & ns * for ns - bh binaries , once the bh enters the magnetosphere of the ns , it can interact with the ns magnetic field @xcite . for strong enough ns magnetic fields ( @xmath144 g ) , such an interaction results in the copious emission of electromagnetic radiation , via a mechanism analogous to the blandford - znajek mechanism @xcite . the electromagnetic radiation may resemble an extremely short ( @xmath145 ) grb , and could be detected from distances of @xmath146mpc using the swift or fermi satellites @xcite . although this mechanism produces a short electromagnetic emission , it is expected to be less beamed than the standard " gamma - ray emission . * magnetic interaction between ns & ns * the magnetic interaction of nss in ns - ns binaries can drive an electromagnetic ( x - rays or gamma - rays ) signal within the last few seconds prior to merger through electric dissipation @xcite . as the non - magnetic ns moves through the magnetosphere of the other , highly magnetized ns ( @xmath147 g ) , the induced electromagnetic force across the non - magnetic ns sets up a circuit connecting the two stars . some of this electric potential dissipates either in the surface layer of the magnetic ns or in the space between the two stars , depending on the resistivity of the space between the two stars . a part of the dissipated energy is carried away through electromagnetic emission , which can reach up to @xmath98erg@xmath50s@xmath148 in the last @xmath7s prior to merger @xcite . 6 . * neutron star flares induced by tidal crust cracking * nss in inspiraling binary systems are subject to tidal deformation . when this deformation exceeds a critical level , the crust of the ns cracks , possibly resulting in a ns flare similar to observed flares @xcite ( see section [ subsection : magnetars ] on magnetar giant flares ) . such flare would represent an isotropic electromagnetic counterpart for binary mergers . observed short - grb precursors may be created by crust cracking @xcite . many gw sources , and in particular grbs , are expected to be copious emitters of neutrinos @xcite . astrophysical neutrino emission is expected within two main sub - groups based on two distinct emission mechanisms , with two distinct energy ranges . mev energy neutrinos ( with energies @xmath149mev ) are produced in the extremely hot , dense central regions of core - collapse supernovae and probably grbs . high - energy neutrinos ( with energies @xmath150gev ) are expected to be emitted by shock accelerated particles in relativistic outflows driven by the central engine of the grb ( e.g. , @xcite ) . so far only mev energy astrophysical neutrinos have been confirmed , and in one instance , for supernova 1987a @xcite . one of the advantages of joint gw - neutrino searches @xcite is that gw and neutrino detectors ( mev and high energy ) continuously observe the whole sky ( one high - energy neutrino detector observing half the sky ) , recording signal candidates without the need to `` point '' the detector in a particular direction . such full sky coverage is of special importance for multimessenger searches as the sky coverage for each messenger needs to overlap for a joint search . further , while electromagnetic follow - up searches require low - latency response from electromagnetic telescopes , gw - neutrino observations can be performed with high latency without loss of information . nevertheless , fast analysis of joint gw - neutrino observations can also enable the electromagnetic follow - up of joint event candidates . in core - collapse supernovae , most of the released gravitational binding energy is emitted in a burst of @xmath25mev neutrinos ( e.g. , ) . both mev neutrino @xcite and gw emissions @xcite are expected to commence near core bounce within a few milliseconds ( @xmath151 ms ) . this temporal correlation is orders of magnitude tighter than correlation with electromagnetic signals @xcite , and can greatly enhance the sensitivity of a search for joint gw - mev neutrino sources . mev neutrino emission peaks within a fraction of a second after bounce , while emission continues for up to tens of seconds as the protoneutron star cools and contracts . the joint detection of gws and mev neutrinos could provide constraints on the core - collapse supernova mechanism as well as information on the properties of matter at high energies and densities @xcite . for example the neutrino spectrum from core - collapse supernovae depend both on the nuclear eos as well as the spin of the core @xcite . one can break this degeneracy using the additional information available in the gw channel , inferring information on both the eos and the spin of the core . a potential secondary collapse due to hadron - quark phase transition in the protoneutron star during its post - bounce evolution @xcite would also result in characteristic neutrino and gw emissions @xcite . long and short grb central engines are also probably strong emitters of mev neutrinos @xcite . as the progenitors of long grbs are likely the progenitors of core - collapse supernovae as well , emission from long grbs may commence similarly to the case of core - collapse supernovae . in the core - collapse scenario , neutrino emission from the core ceases upon black hole formation , while a newly formed accretion disk will become a significant source , as a large fraction of the accretion energy can be carried away by neutrinos @xcite . compact binary mergers the likely progenitor of short grbs are expected to emit mev neutrinos @xcite from the accretion disk around the central black hole . in the case of ns - ns binary mergers , a hypermassive ns may form prior to bh formation , and further produce neutrino @xcite as well as gws @xcite emission . mev neutrino emission from compact binary mergers is expected to commence at the beginning with the merger phase , in coincidence with the gw burst due to the merger . this gw burst signal is preceded by the much longer inspiral phase , and followed by the ringdown phase . such temporal coincidence can be utilized in a joint search . nevertheless , for typical distances of binary mergers , mev neutrinos would be difficult to detect @xcite . several large - scale mev neutrino detectors are currently in operation . these include super - kamiokande ( japan ) @xcite , kamland ( japan ) @xcite , lvd ( italy ) @xcite , borexino ( italy ) @xcite and baksan ( russia ) @xcite . further , the icecube high - energy neutrino detector @xcite is also capable of detecting bursts of mev neutrinos @xcite , albeit without the ability to reconstruct the source direction . recognizing the importance of multimessenger observations , super - kamiokande , lvd , borexino and icecube are members of the supernova early warning system ( snews ) @xcite . these observatories send real - time triggers of detected supernova candidate events , which are distributed to the astronomer community to allow for low - latency follow - up electromagnetic ( or other ) searches . the most sensitive current mev neutrino detectors ( super - kamiokande and icecube ) are able to detect the mev neutrino signal of a supernova from up to @xmath25100 kpc @xcite . the expected event number within this distance , however , is relatively small outside of the milky way . planned megaton detectors , such as lbne @xcite or hyper - kamiokande @xcite , could detect supernovae from up to @xmath8510 mpc @xcite with a supernova rate of @xmath115 per year . multimessenger searches of mev neutrinos and gws could further increase these detectable supernova rates @xcite , and would provide increased confidence in a detected signal . this can be especially important when no electromagnetic counterpart is detected . non - thermal , high - energy ( @xmath152gev ) neutrinos are thought to be created within relativistic outflows driven by the central engine @xcite . emission from early grb afterglows is also plausible ( e.g. , @xcite ) . the emission mechanism is likely similar for both long and short grbs , the former expected to be the stronger emitter . core - collapse supernovae with rapidly rotating cores @xcite , magnetars @xcite and millisecond protomagnetars @xcite are also thought to emit high - energy neutrinos . while recent limits obtained with the icecube detector constrain some emission models @xcite , the standard fireball picture for neutrino emission remains viable @xcite . as their production mechanism is connected to that of gamma photons , high - energy neutrinos are probably beamed similarly to that of gamma ray emission . this decreases the rate of detectable joint sources similarly to the case of electromagnetic emission . for a joint detection , an especially interesting class of sources are grbs with little or no detectable electromagnetic counterpart , which are therefore only detectable via gws and neutrinos . such sources include so - called _ choked _ grbs . in the core - collapse supernova scenario , gamma - ray emission is observable only if the relativistic outflow from the central engine , that is responsible for the production of gamma - rays , breaks out of the star @xcite . the outflow , in order to advance , needs to be driven by an ( active ) central engine . if the breakout time of the outflow is longer than the duration of the active central engine , the outflow stalls , producing no observable gamma - ray emission @xcite . high - energy neutrinos are produced within the outflow and can escape through the stellar envelope , producing similar neutrino emission as for `` successful '' grbs . other interesting sources include low - luminosity ( ll ) grbs , that can frequently go unobserved if their luminosity falls below the threshold of gamma - ray telescopes . ll grbs , while weaker neutrino sources than their high - luminosity ( hl ) counterparts , are thought to be much more frequent , making their overall neutrino flux comparable or even surpass the flux from conventional hl grbs @xcite . besides being interesting for sources not observed through their electromagnetic emission , gw - high - energy neutrino observations can provide information on the internal structure of the progenitor , as well as the properties and dynamics of the relativistic outflow ( e.g. , @xcite ) . a potentially interesting subclass of grbs for joint gw - high energy neutrino observations is low - luminosity grbs @xcite that may be a distinct population from high - luminosity grbs @xcite . it was suggested that more massive stars may form a black hole after collapse , and produce a high - luminosity , high - lorentz factor outflow , while less massive stars may form a neutron star after collapse , and drive an outflow with low luminosity and lorentz factor @xcite . more recently , bromberg et al . @xcite found that estimated jet breakout times for low - luminosity grbs are much longer than the observed durations , in marked difference with high - luminosity grbs , suggesting that low - luminosity grbs may be choked " , i.e. their relativistic outflow stalls before breaking out of the stellar envelope ( see also @xcite ) . low - luminosity grbs are thought to be an order of magnitude more common than their high - luminosity counterparts , with lower electromagnetic luminosity and smaller beaming angle @xcite , making them a promising source type for multimessenger detections . joint searches for gws and high - energy neutrinos are well - suited for multimessenger analyses , since both messengers have typically sub - threshold significances . for this purpose baret @xcite developed a multimessenger analysis method that combines the significance and other information from the two messengers . the location of potential or confirmed host galaxies of grbs can be utilized in gw searches to enhance sensitivity as well as in event selection or localization . long grbs are found to occur in star - forming regions of distant galaxies , in accordance with their association to the deaths of massive stars . consequently , the rate of long grbs is correlated to the blue luminosity of galaxies . long grbs are actually found in the very brightest regions of their host galaxies , which are significantly fainter and more irregular than typical host galaxies of core - collapse supernovae , suggesting that they are associated with extremely massive stars , and galaxies with limited chemical evolution @xcite . the distribution of short grbs seem to follow that of old ( @xmath75gyr ) stellar populations within normal star forming as well as elliptical galaxies @xcite , in stark contrast with the distribution of long - grb host galaxies @xcite . it is highly unlikely that short and long grbs are drawn from the same underlying population @xcite . nevertheless , the rate of short grbs in a given galaxy is correlated with the optical light of their host , and to less extent with the blue luminosity of the galaxy @xcite , indicating that short - grb progenitors have a wide age distribution of several gyr . as neutron stars may experience an initial kick at birth @xcite , binary mergers can take place far away from the star - forming region where they originate from . for kick velocities of @xmath153 and inspiral times of several gyr , binaries could travel large distances before their merger @xcite , traveling far outside their host galaxies . typical predicted distances are @xmath154kpc @xcite , the predicted distance distribution being well - matched by observed short - grb distributions @xcite . magnetars @xcite form another possible progenitor type of short grbs , making up less than @xmath25one - third of their population @xcite . they are weaker and softer gamma - ray emitters than other short grbs , making them identifiable mostly at smaller distances , within the milky way and the large magellanic cloud . magnetars are thought to be created in supernova explosions @xcite . as they can receive an initial kick velocity during the supernova explosion similarly to radio pulsars , only a fraction of them may be near its respective supernova remnant , in accordance with observations @xcite . magnetars are observed to be mostly young ( @xmath2510@xmath155 yr ) objects @xcite , therefore they did not travel far from the star forming region of their respective supernovae . consequently , extragalactic magnetar flares can be expected to occur within the star - forming regions of galaxies . the expected distribution of grbs can be used to enhance gw searches through identifying preferential gw source directions ( e.g. , @xcite ) . a priori information on source distribution has been used in multiple gw - grb searches . the galaxy distribution plays a significant role in electromagnetic follow - up searches . since most gw signal candidates have a reconstructed direction with an uncertainty of a few degrees ( which may be scattered over a larger area on the sky ) , the sky area of the possible gw source direction is greater than the field - of - view of most astronomical instruments used for follow - up observations . to decrease the surveyed area on the sky , the directions in which electromagnetic follow - up is performed is down - selected using the directions of galaxies overlapping with gw sky area of the possible gw source direction @xcite . in multimessenger searches , the distribution of galaxies can be used to increase the significance of astrophysical signals as well as to reject background events whose directions do not overlap with the direction of a galaxy ( e.g. , @xcite ) . the significance of event candidates can be enhanced by weighing events with the a priory probability distribution of multimessenger sources ( e.g. , based on the luminosity and distance of galaxies ) . galaxy sky locations are especially important for gw sources that are detectable only within @xmath73mpc . on this distance scale , existing galaxy catalogs are more complete ( e.g. , @xcite ) , and the number of galaxies is small within the sky area defined by the directional uncertainty of gw observations ( @xmath25 few degrees ; @xcite ) . the use of galaxy direction on this scale could therefore significantly add to the sensitivity of these searches . galaxy catalogs can still aid searches for sources at farther distances , although the sensitivity gain significantly reduces with distance @xcite . in this review we presented an overview of the major directions in which gravitational - wave ( gw ) astronomy has the potential of advancing our understanding of grbs and their progenitors . we discussed the different promising directions that can lead to gw emission from grb progenitors that is detectable with second - generation gw observatories . we also discussed some of the major scientific questions that could be addressed upon the detection of gws from these sources . second generation gw observatories , commencing their operation in the next few years ( e.g. , @xcite ) , will be sensitive enough to reach distances for which the detection of gw signals from grb progenitors becomes possible . the gw signal expected from compact binary coalescences , the likely progenitors of short grbs , is fairly well understood as a function of the ( often unknown ) source properties . the detection of gws can provide estimates or constraints on these source properties . we presented a detailed overview of the questions that can be addressed about short - grb progenitors upon the detection of their gw signature . the core - collapse of massive stars , the likely progenitor of long grbs , has less constrained theoretical gw emission models . this is partly due to the lack of our detailed understanding of the progenitor ( e.g. , how cores maintain their high rotation rate prior to collapse ) , and partly due to the complex dynamics of the collapsing core and the resulting compact object ( protoneutron star or black hole ) and accretion disk , whose understanding requires further theoretical and numerical studies . nevertheless , the core - collapse dynamics may lead to gw signals that are detectable on distance scales comparable to the lower end of the long - grb distance scale ( @xmath156mpc ) . for example rotational instabilities in differentially rotating protoneutron - stars , as well as global instabilities in tori around black holes , both lead to rotating , non - axisymmetric systems with potentially strong gw emission . starquakes in highly - magnetized neutron stars , likely responsible for producing a fraction of short grbs , result in seismic oscillations in the neutron star , which in turn may produce gws detectable with second generation gw observatories . the detection ( or non - detection ) of such gws coincident with the flaring activity of neutron stars can be informative , e.g. , on the properties of matter at nuclear densities , as well as on the properties of astrophysical neutron stars . the authors gratefully acknowledge the excellent comments , help , and suggestions of alessandra corsi , jolien creighton , riccardo desalvo , raymond frey , kunihito ioka , jonah kanner , kostas kokkotas , koutarou kyutoku , ilya mandel , brian metzger , kohta murase , ehud nakar , tsvi piran , maurice van putten , luciano rezzolla , stephan rosswog , yuichiro sekiguchi , peter shawhan and masaru shibata . the authors especially thank richard oshaughnessy for his detailed comments throughout the preparation of the manuscript . ib & sm are grateful for the generous support of columbia university in the city of new york and the national science foundation under cooperative agreement phy-0847182 . ros & pb are supported by nsf award phy-0970074 and the uwm research growth initiative . ros & pb appreciate the hospitality of the ucsb kitp , supported by the nsf with award nsf phy11 - 25915 . 100 url # 1#1urlprefix[2][]#2 mszros p 2012 _ astroparticle physics _ issn 0927 - 6505 http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/s0927650512000692 t a 2007 assessing millisecond proto - magnetars as grb central engines _ revista mexicana de astronomia y astrofisica , vol . 27 _ ( _ revista mexicana de astronomia y astrofisica , vol . vol 27 ) pp 8090 ( _ preprint _ ) s a and hawley j f 1997 instability , turbulence , and enhanced transport in accretion disks _ iau colloq . 163 : accretion phenomena and related outflows _ ( _ astronomical society of the pacific conference series _ vol 121 ) ed wickramasinghe d t , bicknell g v and ferrario l p 90 j , marka s , shawhan p s _ et al . _ 2007 looc up : locating and observing optical counterparts to unmodeled pulses in gravitational waves _ american astronomical society meeting abstracts _ ( _ bulletin of the american astronomical society _ vol 38 ) pp 910+ p s , ligo scientific collaboration and virgo collaboration 2010 looc - up : seeking optical counterparts to gravitational - wave signal candidates _ american astronomical society meeting abstracts # 215 _ ( _ bulletin of the american astronomical society _ vol 42 ) pp 406.06+ p s 2012 rapid alerts for following up gravitational wave event candidates _ society of photo - optical instrumentation engineers ( spie ) conference series _ ( _ society of photo - optical instrumentation engineers ( spie ) conference series _ vol 8448 ) ( _ preprint _ ) n , aussel h , burke b e _ et al . _ 2002 pan - starrs : a large synoptic survey telescope array _ society of photo - optical instrumentation engineers ( spie ) conference series _ ( _ society of photo - optical instrumentation engineers ( spie ) conference series _ vol 4836 ) ed tyson j a and wolff s pp 154164 i , kelley l z and ramirez - ruiz e 2012 towards improving the prospects for coordinated gravitational - wave and electromagnetic observations _ iau symposium _ ( _ iau symposium _ vol 285 ) ed griffin r e m , hanisch r j and seaman r pp 358360 ( _ preprint _ ) Abstract:

Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.

Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered . Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video . Paper: in the theory of critical phenomena it is usually assumed that a physical system near a continuous phase transition is characterized by a single length scale ( the `` correlation length '' ) in terms of which all other lengths should be measured . when combined with the experimental observation that the correlation length diverges at the phase transition , this simple but strong assumption , known as the scaling hypothesis , leads to the belief that at criticality the system has no characteristic length , and is therefore invariant under scale transformations . this suggests that all thermodynamic functions at criticality are homogeneous functions , and predicts the appearance of power laws . it also means that it should be possible to rescale a critical system appropriately and obtain a continuum model ( the `` continuum scaling limit '' ) which may have more symmetries and be easier to study than the original discrete model defined on a lattice . indeed , thanks to the work of polyakov @xcite and others @xcite , it was understood by physicists since the early seventies that critical statistical mechanical models should possess continuum scaling limits with a global conformal invariance that goes beyond simple scale invariance , as long as the discrete models have `` enough '' rotation invariance . this property gives important information , enabling the determination of two- and three - point functions at criticality , when they are nonvanishing . because the conformal group is in general a finite dimensional lie group , the resulting constraints are limited in number ; however , the situation becomes particularly interesting in two dimensions , since there every analytic function @xmath1 defines a conformal transformation , at least at points where @xmath2 . as a consequence , the conformal group in two dimensions is infinite - dimensional . after this observation was made , a large number of critical problems in two dimensions were analyzed using conformal methods , which were applied , among others , to ising and potts models , brownian motion , self - avoiding walk ( saw ) , percolation , and diffusion limited aggregation ( dla ) . the large body of knowledge and techniques that resulted , starting with the work of belavin , polyakov and zamolodchikov @xcite in the early eighties , goes under the name of conformal field theory ( cft ) . in two dimensions , one of the main goals of cft and its most important application to statistical mechanics is a complete classification of all universality classes via irreducible representations of the infinite - dimensional virasoro algebra . partly because of the success of cft , work in recent years on critical phenomena seemed to slow down somewhat , probably due to the feeling that most of the leading problems had been resolved nonetheless , however powerful and successful it may be , cft has some limitations and leaves various open problems . first of all , the theory deals primarily with correlation functions of _ local _ ( or quasi - local ) operators , and is therefore not always the best tool to investigate other quantities . secondly , given some critical lattice model , there is no way , within the theory itself , of deciding to which cft it corresponds . a third limitation , of a different nature , is due to the fact that the methods of cft , although very powerful , are generally speaking not completely rigorous from a mathematical point of view . in a somewhat surprising twist , the most recent developments in the area of two - dimensional critical phenomena have emerged in the mathematics literature and have followed a new direction , which has provided new tools and a way of coping with at least some of the limitations of cft . the new approach may even provide a reinterpretation of cft , and seems to be complementary to the traditional one in the sense that questions that are difficult to pose and/or answer within cft are easy and natural in this new approach and vice versa . these new developments came on the heels of interesting results on the scaling limits of discrete models ( see , e.g. , the work of aizenman @xcite , benjamini - schramm @xcite , aizenman - burchard @xcite , aizenman - burchard - newman - wilson @xcite , aizenman - duplantier - aharony @xcite and kenyon @xcite ) but they differ greatly from those because they are based on a radically new approach whose main tool is the stochastic loewner evolution ( @xmath3 ) , or schramm - loewner evolution , as it is also known , introduced by schramm @xcite . the new approach , which is probabilistic in nature , focuses directly on non - local structures that characterize a given system , such as cluster boundaries in ising , potts and percolation models , or loops in the @xmath4 model . at criticality , these non - local objects become , in the continuum limit , random curves whose distributions can be uniquely identified thanks to their conformal invariance and a certain markovian " property . there is a one - parameter family of @xmath3s , indexed by a positive real number @xmath5 , and they appear to be the only possible candidates for the scaling limits of interfaces of two - dimensional critical systems that are believed to be conformally invariant . in particular , substantial progress has been made in recent years , thanks to @xmath3 , in understanding the fractal and conformally invariant nature of ( the scaling limit of ) large percolation clusters , which has attracted much attention and is of interest both for intrinsic reasons , given the many applications of percolation , and as a paradigm for the behavior of other systems . the work of schramm @xcite and smirnov @xcite has identified the scaling limit of a certain percolation interface with @xmath0 , providing , along with the work of lawler - schramm - werner @xcite and smirnov - werner @xcite , a confirmation of many results in the physics literature , as well as some new results . however , @xmath0 describes a single interface , which can be obtained by imposing special boundary conditions , and is not in itself sufficient to immediately describe the scaling limit of the unconstrained model ( without boundary conditions ) in the whole plane . in particular , not only the nature and properties , but the very existence of the scaling limit of the collection of all interfaces remained an open question . this is true of all models , such as ising and potts models , that are represented in terms of clusters , and where the set of all interfaces forms a collection of loops . as already indicated by smirnov @xcite , such a collection of loops should have a continuum limit , that we will call the full " scaling limit of the model . the single interface limit is ideal for analyzing certain crossing / connectivity probabilities but not so good for others ; in section [ quickresults ] we give a few examples showing the use of the full scaling limit to represent such probabilities . in the context of percolation , in @xcite the authors used @xmath0 to construct a random process of continuous loops in the plane , which was identified with the full scaling limit of critical two - dimensional percolation , but without detailed proofs . ( for a discussion of whether this full scaling limit is a black noise , " see @xcite . for an analysis of random processes of loops related to @xmath6 for other values of @xmath5 , and _ conjectured _ to correspond to the full scaling limits of other statistical mechanics models , see @xcite . ) in this paper , we complete the analysis of @xcite , making rigorous the connection between the construction given there and the full scaling limit of percolation , and we prove some properties of the full scaling limit , the continuum nonsimple loop process , including ( one version of ) conformal invariance . the present work , as well as that of smirnov @xcite , builds on a collection of papers , including @xcite , which provided both inspiration and essential technical results . the proofs are based on the fact that the percolation exploration path converges in distribution to the trace of chordal @xmath0 , as argued by schramm and smirnov @xcite , and in particular on a specific version of this convergence that we will call statement ( s ) ( see section [ main - results ] ) . we note that no detailed proof of any version of convergence to @xmath0 has been available . nevertheless , at the request of the editor , we do not include a detailed proof of statement ( s ) in the present paper , as originally planned @xcite , due to length considerations . however , a detailed proof of statement ( s ) , based on smirnov s theorem about the convergence of crossing probabilities to cardy s formula @xcite , is now the topic of a separate paper @xcite . we note that statement ( s ) is restricted to jordan domains while no such restriction is indicated in @xcite . the rest of the paper is organized as follows . in section [ quickresults ] , we provide a quick presentation of theorems [ main - result1 ] , [ features ] , and [ main - result2 ] , which represent most of our main results , with some definitions postponed until section [ defs ] , including that of @xmath0 . section [ construct ] is devoted to the construction mentioned in theorem [ main - result2 ] of the continuum nonsimple loop process in a finite region @xmath7 of the plane . in section [ lapa ] , we introduce the discrete lattice model and a discrete construction analogous to the continuum one presented in section [ construct ] . most of the main technical results of this paper are stated in section [ main - results ] , while section [ proofs ] contains the proofs , using ( s ) , of those results and the results in section [ quickresults ] . at the percolation critical point , with probability one there is no infinite cluster ( in two dimensions ) , therefore the percolation cluster boundaries form loops ( see figure [ loops ] , where site percolation on the triangular lattice @xmath8 is depicted exploiting the duality between @xmath8 and the hexagonal lattice @xmath9 ) . we will refer to the continuum scaling limit ( as the mesh size @xmath10 of the rescaled hexagonal lattice @xmath11 goes to zero ) of the collection of all these loops as the continuum nonsimple loop process . its existence is the content of theorem [ main - result1 ] and some of its properties are described in theorem [ features ] below . . each hexagon of the hexagonal lattice @xmath9 represents a site of @xmath8 and is assigned one of two colors . in the critical percolation model , colors are assigned randomly with equal probability . the cluster boundaries are indicated by heavy lines ; some small loops appear , while other boundaries extend beyond the finite window . , width=302 ] the continuum nonsimple loop process can be described as a gas " of loops , or more precisely , a probability measure on countable collections of continuous , nonsimple , fractal loops in the plane . later in this paper , we will provide precise definitions of the objects involved in the next three theorems as well as detailed proofs . [ main - result1 ] in the continuum scaling limit , the probability distribution of the collection of all boundary contours of critical site percolation on the triangular lattice converges to a probability distribution on collections of continuous , nonsimple loops . [ features ] the continuum nonsimple loop process whose distribution is specified in theorem [ main - result1 ] has the following properties , which are valid with probability one : 1 . it is a random collection of countably many noncrossing continuous loops in the plane . the loops can and do touch themselves and each other many times , but there are no triple points ; i.e. no three or more loops can come together at the same point , and a single loop can not touch the same point more than twice , nor can a loop touch a point where another loop touches itself . any deterministic point @xmath12 in the plane ( i.e. , chosen independently of the loop process ) is surrounded by an infinite family of nested loops with diameters going to both zero and infinity ; any annulus about that point with inner radius @xmath13 and outer radius @xmath14 contains only a finite number @xmath15 of those loops . consequently , any two distinct deterministic points of the plane are separated by loops winding around each of them . any two loops are connected by a finite `` path '' of touching loops . the next theorem makes explicit the relation between the percolation full scaling limit and @xmath0 . its proof ( see section [ proofs ] ) relies on an inductive procedure that makes use of @xmath0 at each step and allows to obtain collections of loops with the correct distribution . [ main - result2 ] a continuum nonsimple loop process with the same distribution as in theorem [ main - result1 ] can be constructed by a procedure in which each loop is obtained as the concatenation of an @xmath0 path with ( a portion of ) another @xmath0 path ( see figure [ fig - sec3 ] ) . this procedure is carried out first in a finite disk @xmath16 of radius @xmath17 in the plane ( see section [ unit - disc ] ) , and then an infinite volume limit , @xmath18 , is taken . [ conf - inv ] there are various possible ways to formulate the conformal invariance properties of the continuum nonsimple loop process . one version is given in theorem [ thm - conf - inv ] . next we give some examples showing how the scaling limit of various connectivity / crossing probabilities can be expressed in terms of the loop process . although we can not say whether this fact may eventually lead to exact expressions going beyond cardy s formula , it at least shows that scaling limits of such probabilities exist and are conformally invariant ( early discussions of scaling limits of connectivity functions and of the consequences of conformal invariance for such quantities are given in @xcite ) . the examples will also highlight the natural nested structure of the collection of percolation cluster boundaries in the scaling limit . consider first an annulus centered at @xmath12 with inner radius @xmath19 and outer radius @xmath20 ( see figure [ annulus ] ) . the scaling limit @xmath21 of the probability of a crossing of the annulus ( by crossing here we refer to a monochromatic " crossing , i.e. , a crossing by either of the two colors , as discussed in section [ lapa ] see also figure [ loops ] ) can be expressed as follows in terms of the random variable @xmath22 defined in theorem [ features ] above : @xmath21 is the probability that @xmath22 equals zero . more generally , @xmath22 represents the scaling limit of the minimal number of cluster boundaries traversed by any path connecting the inner and outer circles of the annulus . an example with more geometric structure involves two disjoint discs @xmath23 and @xmath24 in the plane and the scaling limit @xmath25 of the probability that there is a crossing from @xmath23 to @xmath24 ( see figure [ discs ] ) . here we let @xmath26 denote the number of distinct loops in the plane that contain @xmath23 in their interior and @xmath24 in their exterior , and define @xmath27 in the complementary way . then @xmath25 is the probability that @xmath28 , and the scaling limit of the minimal number of cluster boundaries that must be crossed to connect @xmath23 to @xmath24 is @xmath29 . one can also consider , as in @xcite , the probability of a single monochromatic cluster in the exterior @xmath30 of the union of @xmath31 disjoint discs ( or other regions ) connecting all @xmath31 disc boundaries . in the scaling limit , this can be expressed as the probability of the event that there is a single continuous ( nonsimple ) curve in @xmath30 touching all @xmath31 disc boundaries that _ does not cross any of the loops of the continuum nonsimple loop process . _ we conclude this section by remarking that the continuum nonsimple loop process is just one example of a family of conformal loop ensembles " that are related to @xmath3 and to the gaussian free field ( see @xcite ) , and are conjectured to describe the full scaling limit of statistical mechanics models such as percolation , ising and potts models . the work of lawler , schramm , sheffield and werner has provided tools to define such loop ensembles in the continuum and to study some of their properties . but the key question concerning the proof of their connection to the discrete models via a continuum scaling limit remains an important open challenge , the only exception currently being percolation , as we show in this paper . we will find it convenient to identify the real plane @xmath32 and the complex plane @xmath33 . we will also refer to the riemann sphere @xmath34 and the open upper half - plane @xmath35 ( and its closure @xmath36 ) , where chordal @xmath3 will be defined ( see section [ sle1 ] ) . @xmath37 will denote the open unit disc @xmath38 . a domain @xmath7 of the complex plane @xmath33 is a nonempty , connected , open subset of @xmath33 ; a simply connected domain @xmath7 is said to be a jordan domain if its ( topological ) boundary @xmath39 is a jordan curve ( i.e. , a simple continuous loop ) . we will make repeated use of riemann s mapping theorem , which states that if @xmath7 is any simply connected domain other than the entire plane @xmath33 and @xmath40 , then there is a unique conformal map @xmath41 of @xmath7 onto @xmath37 such that @xmath42 and @xmath43 . when taking the scaling limit as the lattice mesh size @xmath44 one can focus on fixed finite regions , @xmath45 , or consider the whole @xmath32 at once . the second option avoids dealing with boundary conditions , but requires an appropriate choice of metric . a convenient way of dealing with the whole @xmath32 is to replace the euclidean metric with a distance function @xmath46 defined on @xmath47 by @xmath48 where the infimum is over all smooth curves @xmath49 joining @xmath50 with @xmath51 , parameterized by arclength @xmath52 , and where @xmath53 denotes the euclidean norm . this metric is equivalent to the euclidean metric in bounded regions , but it has the advantage of making @xmath32 precompact . adding a single point at infinity yields the compact space @xmath54 which is isometric , via stereographic projection , to the two - dimensional sphere . in dealing with the scaling limit we use the approach of aizenman - burchard @xcite . denote by @xmath55 the complete separable metric space of continuous curves in the closure @xmath56 of the disc @xmath16 of radius @xmath17 with the metric ( [ distance ] ) defined below . curves are regarded as equivalence classes of continuous functions from the unit interval to @xmath56 , modulo monotonic reparametrizations . @xmath57 will represent a particular curve and @xmath58 a parametrization of @xmath57 ; @xmath59 will represent a set of curves ( more precisely , a closed subset of @xmath55 ) . @xmath60 will denote the uniform metric on curves , defined by @xmath61 } |\gamma_1(t ) - \gamma_2(t)|,\ ] ] where the infimum is over all choices of parametrizations of @xmath62 and @xmath63 from the interval @xmath64 $ ] . the distance between two closed sets of curves is defined by the induced hausdorff metric as follows : @xmath65 the space @xmath66 of closed subsets of @xmath55 ( i.e. , collections of curves in @xmath56 ) with the metric ( [ hausdorff ] ) is also a complete separable metric space . we denote by @xmath67 its borel @xmath68-algebra . for each fixed @xmath69 , the random curves that we consider are polygonal paths on the edges of the hexagonal lattice @xmath70 , dual to the triangular lattice @xmath71 . a superscript @xmath10 is added to indicate that the curves correspond to a model with a `` short distance cutoff '' of magnitude @xmath10 . we will also consider the complete separable metric space @xmath72 of continuous curves in @xmath54 with the distance @xmath73 } \delta(\gamma_1(t),\gamma_2(t)),\ ] ] where the infimum is again over all choices of parametrizations of @xmath62 and @xmath63 from the interval @xmath64 $ ] . the distance between two closed sets of curves is again defined by the induced hausdorff metric as follows : @xmath74 the space @xmath75 of closed sets of @xmath76 ( i.e. , collections of curves in @xmath54 ) with the metric ( [ hausdorff - d ] ) is also a complete separable metric space . we denote by @xmath77 its borel @xmath68-algebra . when we talk about convergence in distribution of random curves , we always mean with respect to the uniform metric ( [ distance ] ) , while when we deal with closed collections of curves , we always refer to the metric ( [ hausdorff ] ) or ( [ hausdorff - d ] ) . [ ab ] in this paper , the space @xmath75 of closed sets of @xmath76 is used for collections of exploration paths ( see section [ explo ] ) and cluster boundary loops and their scaling limits , @xmath0 paths and continuum nonsimple loops . the stochastic loewner evolution ( @xmath3 ) was introduced by schramm @xcite as a tool for studying the scaling limit of two - dimensional discrete ( defined on a lattice ) probabilistic models whose scaling limits are expected to be conformally invariant . in this section we define the chordal version of @xmath3 ; for more on the subject , the interested reader can consult the original paper @xcite as well as the fine reviews by lawler @xcite , kager and nienhuis @xcite , and werner @xcite , and lawler s book @xcite . let @xmath78 denote the upper half - plane . for a given continuous real function @xmath79 with @xmath80 , define , for each @xmath81 , the function @xmath82 as the solution to the ode @xmath83 with @xmath84 . this is well defined as long as @xmath85 , i.e. , for all @xmath86 , where @xmath87 } | g_s(z ) - u_s| > 0 \}.\ ] ] let @xmath88 and let @xmath89 be the unbounded component of @xmath90 ; it can be shown that @xmath91 is bounded and that @xmath92 is a conformal map from @xmath89 onto @xmath78 . for each @xmath93 , it is possible to write @xmath82 as @xmath94 when @xmath95 . the family @xmath96 is called the * loewner chain * associated to the driving function @xmath97 . [ def - sle ] * chordal @xmath6 * is the loewner chain @xmath96 that is obtained when the driving function @xmath98 is @xmath99 times a standard real - valued brownian motion @xmath100 with @xmath101 . for all @xmath102 , chordal @xmath6 is almost surely generated by a continuous random curve @xmath57 in the sense that , for all @xmath103 , @xmath104 is the unbounded connected component of @xmath105 $ ] ; @xmath57 is called the * trace * of chordal @xmath6 . let @xmath106 be a jordan domain . by riemann s mapping theorem , there are ( many ) conformal maps from the upper half - plane @xmath78 onto @xmath7 . in particular , given two distinct points @xmath107 , there exists a conformal map @xmath41 from @xmath78 onto @xmath7 such that @xmath108 and @xmath109 . in fact , the choice of the points @xmath110 and @xmath111 on the boundary of @xmath7 only characterizes @xmath112 up to a multiplicative factor , since @xmath113 would also do . suppose that @xmath96 is a chordal @xmath6 in @xmath78 as defined above ; we define chordal @xmath6 @xmath114 in @xmath7 from @xmath110 to @xmath111 as the image of the loewner chain @xmath96 under @xmath41 . it is possible to show , using scaling properties of @xmath6 , that the law of @xmath114 is unchanged , up to a linear time - change , if we replace @xmath112 by @xmath113 . this makes it natural to consider @xmath114 as a process from @xmath110 to @xmath111 in @xmath7 , ignoring the role of @xmath41 . we are interested in the case @xmath115 , for which @xmath96 is generated by a continuous , nonsimple , non - self - crossing curve @xmath57 with hausdorff dimension @xmath116 . we will denote by @xmath117 the image of @xmath57 under @xmath41 and call it the trace of chordal @xmath0 in @xmath7 from @xmath110 to @xmath111 ; @xmath117 is a continuous nonsimple curve inside @xmath7 from @xmath110 to @xmath111 , and it can be given a parametrization @xmath118 such that @xmath119 and @xmath120 , so that we are in the metric framework described in section [ space ] . it will be convenient to think of @xmath117 as an oriented path , with orientation from @xmath110 to @xmath111 . we present here rad s theorem @xcite ( see also theorem 2.11 of @xcite ) , which deals with sequences of jordan domains and the corresponding conformal maps from the unit disc , and will be used in the proof of the key lemma [ strong - smirnov ] . since the theorem deals with jordan domains , the conformal maps from the unit disc to those domains have a continuous extension to @xmath121 . with a slight abuse of notation , we do not distinguish between the conformal maps and their continuous extensions . [ rado - thm ] for @xmath122 , let @xmath123 and @xmath124 be jordan curves parameterized respectively by @xmath125 and @xmath126 , @xmath127 $ ] , and let @xmath128 and @xmath41 be conformal maps from @xmath37 onto the inner domains of @xmath123 and @xmath124 such that @xmath129 and @xmath130 , @xmath131 for all @xmath132 . if @xmath133 as @xmath134 uniformly in @xmath64 $ ] then @xmath135 as @xmath134 uniformly in @xmath136 . the type of convergence of sequences of jordan domains @xmath137 to a jordan domain @xmath7 that will be encountered in lemma [ strong - smirnov ] is such that @xmath138 converges , as @xmath134 , to @xmath39 in the uniform metric ( [ distance ] ) on continuous curves , which is clearly sufficient to apply theorem [ rado - thm ] . as a preview to the full construction , we explain how to construct a single loop using two @xmath0 paths inside a domain @xmath7 whose boundary is assumed to have a given orientation ( clockwise or counterclockwise ) . this is done in three steps ( see figure [ fig - sec3 ] ) , of which the first consists in choosing two points @xmath110 and @xmath111 on the boundary @xmath39 of @xmath7 and `` running '' a chordal @xmath0 , @xmath139 , from @xmath110 to @xmath111 inside @xmath7 . as explained in section [ sle2 ] , we consider @xmath57 as an oriented path , with orientation from @xmath110 to @xmath111 . the set @xmath140 $ ] is a countable union of its connected components , which are open and simply connected . if @xmath12 is a deterministic point in @xmath7 , then with probability one , @xmath12 is not touched by @xmath57 @xcite and so it belongs to a unique domain in @xmath140 $ ] that we denote @xmath141 . in three steps . a domain @xmath7 is formed by the solid curve . the dashed curve is an excursion @xmath142 ( from a to b ) of an @xmath0 in @xmath7 that creates a subdomain @xmath143 containing @xmath12 . the dotted curve @xmath144 is an @xmath0 in @xmath143 from b to a. a loop is formed by @xmath142 followed by @xmath144.,width=302 ] the elements of @xmath140 $ ] can be conveniently characterized in terms of how a point @xmath12 in the interior of the component was first `` trapped '' at some time @xmath145 by @xmath146 $ ] , perhaps together with either @xmath147 or @xmath148 ( the portions of the boundary @xmath39 from @xmath110 to @xmath111 counterclockwise or clockwise respectively ) see figure [ four - types ] : ( 1 ) those components whose boundary contains a segment of @xmath148 between two successive visits at @xmath149 and @xmath150 to @xmath148 ( where here and below @xmath151 ) , ( 2 ) the analogous components with @xmath148 replaced by the other part of the boundary @xmath147 , ( 3 ) those components formed when @xmath152 with @xmath57 winding about @xmath12 in a counterclockwise direction between @xmath153 and @xmath145 , and finally ( 4 ) the analogous clockwise components . from @xmath110 to @xmath111 inside a domain whose boundary is the solid curve.,width=226 ] we give to the boundary of a domain of type 3 or 4 the orientation induced by how the curve @xmath57 winds around the points inside that domain . for a domain @xmath154 of type 1 or 2 which is produced by an excursion " @xmath142 from @xmath155 to @xmath156 , the part of the boundary that corresponds to the inner perimeter of the excursion @xmath142 ( i.e. , the perimeter of @xmath57 seen from @xmath12 ) is oriented according to the direction of @xmath57 , i.e. , from @xmath157 to @xmath158 . if we assume that @xmath39 is oriented from @xmath110 to @xmath111 clockwise , then the boundaries of domains of type 2 have a well defined orientation , while the boundaries of domains of type 1 do not , since they are composed of two parts which are both oriented from the beginning to the end of the excursion that produced the domain . now , let @xmath143 be a domain of type 1 and let @xmath159 and @xmath160 be respectively the starting and ending point of the excursion that generated @xmath143 . the second step to construct a loop is to run a chordal @xmath0 , @xmath161 , inside @xmath143 from @xmath160 to @xmath159 ; the third and final step consists in pasting together @xmath142 and @xmath144 . running @xmath144 inside @xmath143 from @xmath160 to @xmath159 partitions @xmath162 into new domains . notice that if we assign an orientation to the boundaries of these domains according to the same rules used above , all of those boundaries have a well defined orientation , so that the construction of loops just presented can be iterated inside each one of these domains ( as well as inside each of the domains of type 2 , 3 and 4 generated by @xmath117 in the first step ) . this will be done in the next section . in this section we define the continuum nonsimple loop process inside the unit disc @xmath163 via an inductive procedure . later , in order to define the continuum nonsimple loops in the whole plane , the unit disc will be replaced by a growing sequence of large discs , @xmath16 , with @xmath164 ( see theorem [ thm - therm - lim ] ) . the basic ingredient in the algorithmic construction , given in the previous section , consists of a chordal @xmath0 path @xmath117 between two points @xmath110 and @xmath111 of the boundary @xmath39 of a given simply connected domain @xmath106 . we will organize the inductive procedure in steps , each one corresponding to one @xmath0 inside a certain domain generated by the previous steps . to do that , we need to order the domains present at the end of each step , so as to choose the one to use in the next step . for this purpose , we introduce a deterministic countable set of points @xmath165 that are dense in @xmath33 and are endowed with a deterministic order ( here and below by deterministic we mean that they are assigned before the beginning of the construction and are independent of the @xmath0 s ) . the first step consists of an @xmath0 path , @xmath166 , inside @xmath37 from @xmath167 to @xmath168 , which produces many domains that are the connected components of the set @xmath169 $ ] . these domains can be priority - ordered according to the maximal @xmath170- or @xmath171- coordinate distances between points on their boundaries and using the rank of the points in @xmath165 ( contained in the domains ) to break ties , as follows . for a domain @xmath7 , let @xmath172 be the maximal @xmath170- or @xmath171-distance between points on its boundary , whichever is greater . domains with larger @xmath173 have higher priority , and if two domains have the same @xmath173 , the one containing the highest ranking point of @xmath165 from those two domains has higher priority . the priority order of domains of course changes as the construction proceeds and new domains are formed . the second step of the construction consists of an @xmath0 path , @xmath63 , that is produced in the domain with highest priority ( after the first step ) . since all the domains that are produced in the construction are jordan domains , as explained in the discussion following corollary [ jordan ] , for all steps we can use the definition of chordal @xmath3 given in section [ sle2 ] . as a result of the construction , the @xmath0 paths are naturally ordered : @xmath174 . it will be shown ( see especially the proof of theorem [ thm - convergence ] below ) that every domain that is formed during the construction is eventually used ( this is in fact one important requirement in deciding how to order the domains and therefore how to organize the construction ) . so far we have not explained how to choose the starting and ending points of the @xmath0 paths on the boundaries of the domains . in order to do this , we give an orientation to the boundaries of the domains produced by the construction according to the rules explained in section [ single - loop ] . we call * monochromatic * a boundary which gets , as a consequence of those rules , a well defined ( clockwise or counterclockwise ) orientation ; the choice of this term will be clarified when we discuss the lattice version of the loop construction below . we will generally take our initial domain @xmath175 ( or @xmath16 ) to have a monochromatic boundary ( either clockwise or counterclockwise orientation ) . it is easy to see by induction that the boundaries that are not monochromatic are composed of two `` pieces '' joined at two special points ( call them a and b , as in the example of section [ single - loop ] ) , such that one piece is a portion of the boundary of a previous domain , and the other is the inner perimeter of an excursion ( see again section [ single - loop ] ) . both pieces are oriented in the same direction , say from a to b ( see figure [ fig - sec3 ] ) . for a domain whose boundary is not monochromatic , we make the `` natural '' choice of starting and ending points , corresponding to the end and beginning of the excursion that produced the domain ( the points b and a respectively , in the example above ) . as explained in section [ single - loop ] , when such a domain is used with this choice of points on the boundary , a loop is produced , together with other domains , whose boundaries are all monochromatic . for a domain whose boundary is monochromatic , and therefore has a well defined orientation , there are various procedures which would yield the `` correct '' distribution for the resulting continuum nonsimple loop process ; one possibility is as follows . given a domain @xmath7 , @xmath110 and @xmath111 are chosen so that , of all pairs @xmath176 of points in @xmath39 , they maximize @xmath177 if @xmath178 , or else they maximize @xmath179 . if the choice is not unique , to restrict the number of pairs one looks at those pairs , among the ones already obtained , that maximize the other of @xmath180 . notice that this leaves at most two pairs of points ; if that s the case , the pair that contains the point with minimal real ( and , if necessary , imaginary ) part is chosen . the iterative procedure produces a loop every time a domain whose boundary is not monochromatic is used . our basic loop process consists of the collection of all loops generated by this inductive procedure ( i.e. , the limiting object obtained from the construction by letting the number of steps @xmath134 ) , to which we add a trivial " loop for each @xmath12 in @xmath37 , so that the collection of loops is closed in the appropriate sense @xcite . the continuum nonsimple loop process in the whole plane is introduced in theorem [ thm - therm - lim ] , section [ main - results ] . there , a trivial " loop for each @xmath181 has to be added to make the space of loops closed . we will denote by @xmath8 the two - dimensional triangular lattice , whose sites we think of as the elementary cells of a regular hexagonal lattice @xmath9 embedded in the plane as in figure [ loops ] . two hexagons are * neighbors * if they are adjacent , i.e. , if they have a common edge . a sequence @xmath182 of hexagons such that @xmath183 and @xmath184 are neighbors for all @xmath185 and @xmath186 whenever @xmath187 will be called a * @xmath8-path * and denoted by @xmath188 . if the first and last sites of the path are neighbors , the path will be called a * @xmath8-loop*. a finite set @xmath7 of hexagons is * connected * if any two hexagons in @xmath7 can be joined by a @xmath8-path contained in @xmath7 . we say that a finite set @xmath7 of hexagons is * simply connected * if both @xmath7 and its complement are connected . for a simply connected set @xmath7 of hexagons , we denote by @xmath189 its * external site boundary * , or * s - boundary * ( i.e. , the set of hexagons that do not belong to @xmath7 but are adjacent to hexagons in @xmath7 ) , and by @xmath39 the topological boundary of @xmath7 when @xmath7 is considered as a domain of @xmath33 . we will call a bounded , simply connected subset @xmath7 of @xmath8 a * jordan set * if its s - boundary @xmath189 is a @xmath8-loop . for a jordan set @xmath190 , a vertex @xmath191 that belongs to @xmath39 can be either of two types , according to whether the edge incident on @xmath170 that is not in @xmath39 belongs to a hexagon in @xmath7 or not . we call a vertex of the second type an * e - vertex * ( e for `` external '' or `` exposed '' ) . given a jordan set @xmath7 and two e - vertices @xmath192 in @xmath39 , we denote by @xmath193 the portion of @xmath39 traversed counterclockwise from @xmath170 to @xmath171 , and call it the * right boundary * ; the remaining part of the boundary is denote by @xmath194 and is called the * left boundary*. analogously , the portion of @xmath195 of @xmath189 whose hexagons are adjacent to @xmath193 is called the * right s - boundary * and the remaining part the * left s - boundary*. a * percolation configuration * @xmath196 on @xmath8 is an assignment of @xmath197 ( equivalently , yellow ) or @xmath198 ( blue ) to each site of @xmath8 ( i.e. , to each hexagon of @xmath9 see figure [ loops ] ) . for a domain @xmath7 of the plane , the restriction to the subset @xmath199 of @xmath8 of the percolation configuration @xmath68 is denoted by @xmath200 . on the space of configurations @xmath201 , we consider the usual product topology and denote by @xmath202 the uniform measure , corresponding to bernoulli percolation with equal density of yellow ( minus ) and blue ( plus ) hexagons , which is critical percolation in the case of the triangular lattice . a ( percolation ) * cluster * is a maximal , connected , monochromatic subset of @xmath8 ; we will distinguish between blue ( plus ) and yellow ( minus ) clusters . the * boundary * of a cluster @xmath7 is the set of edges of @xmath9 that surround the cluster ( i.e. , its peierls contour ) ; it coincides with the topological boundary of @xmath7 considered as a domain of @xmath33 . the set of all boundaries is a collection of `` nested '' simple loops along the edges of @xmath9 . given a percolation configuration @xmath68 , we associate an arrow to each edge of @xmath9 belonging to the boundary of a cluster in such a way that the hexagon to the right of the edge with respect to the direction of the arrow is blue ( plus ) . the set of all boundaries then becomes a collection of nested , oriented , simple loops . a * boundary path * ( or * b - path * ) @xmath57 is a sequence @xmath203 of distinct edges of @xmath9 belonging to the boundary of a cluster and such that @xmath204 and @xmath205 meet at a vertex of @xmath9 for all @xmath185 . to each b - path , we can associate a direction according to the direction of the edges in the path . given a b - path @xmath57 , we denote by @xmath206 ( respectively , @xmath207 ) the set of blue ( resp . , yellow ) hexagons ( i.e. , sites of @xmath8 ) adjacent to @xmath57 ; we also let @xmath208 . for a jordan set @xmath190 and two e - vertices @xmath192 in @xmath39 , imagine coloring blue all the hexagons in @xmath195 and yellow all those in @xmath209 . then , for any percolation configuration @xmath200 inside @xmath7 , there is a unique b - path @xmath57 from @xmath170 to @xmath171 which separates the blue cluster adjacent to @xmath195 from the yellow cluster adjacent to @xmath209 . we call @xmath210 a * percolation exploration path * ( see figure [ fig2-sec4 ] ) . an exploration path @xmath57 can be decomposed into * left excursions * @xmath142 , i.e. , maximal b - subpaths of @xmath57 that do not use edges of the left boundary @xmath194 . successive left excursions are separated by portions of @xmath57 that contain only edges of the left boundary @xmath194 . analogously , @xmath57 can be decomposed into * right excursions * , i.e. , maximal b - subpaths of @xmath57 that do not use edges of the right boundary @xmath193 . successive right excursions are separated by portions of @xmath57 that contain only edges of the right boundary @xmath193 . notice that the exploration path @xmath211 only depends on the percolation configuration @xmath200 inside @xmath7 and the positions of the e - vertices @xmath170 and @xmath171 ; in particular , it does not depend on the color of the hexagons in @xmath189 , since it is defined by imposing fictitious @xmath212 boundary conditions on @xmath7 . to see this more clearly , we next show how to construct the percolation exploration path dynamically , via the * percolation exploration process * defined below . given a jordan set @xmath190 and two e - vertices @xmath192 in @xmath39 , assign to @xmath193 a counterclockwise orientation ( i.e. , from @xmath170 to @xmath171 ) and to @xmath194 a clockwise orientation . call @xmath213 the edge incident on @xmath170 that does not belong to @xmath39 and orient it in the direction of @xmath170 ; this is the `` starting edge '' of an exploration procedure that will produce an oriented path inside @xmath7 along the edges of @xmath9 , together with two _ nonsimple _ monochromatic paths on @xmath8 . > from @xmath213 , the process moves along the edges of hexagons in @xmath7 according to the rules below . at each step there are two possible edges ( left or right edge with respect to the current direction of exploration ) to choose from , both belonging to the same hexagon @xmath214 contained in @xmath7 or @xmath189 . * if @xmath214 belongs to @xmath7 and has not been previously explored , " its color is determined by flipping a fair coin and then the edge to the left ( with respect to the direction in which the exploration is moving ) is chosen if @xmath214 is blue ( plus ) , or the edge to the right is chosen if @xmath214 is yellow ( minus ) . * if @xmath214 belongs to @xmath7 and has been previously explored , the color already assigned to it is used to choose an edge according to the rule above . * if @xmath214 belongs to the right external boundary @xmath195 , the left edge is chosen . * if @xmath214 belongs to the left external boundary @xmath209 , the right edge is chosen . * the exploration process stops when it reaches @xmath111 . we can assign an arrow to each edge in the path in such a way that the hexagon to the right of the edge with respect to the arrow is blue ; for edges in @xmath39 , we assign the arrows according to the direction assigned to the boundary . in this way , we get an oriented path , whose shape and orientation depend solely on the color of the hexagons explored during the construction of the path . boundary conditions on the first column , corresponding to the boundary of the region where the exploration is carried out . the colored hexagons that do not belong to the first column have been `` explored '' during the exploration process . the heavy line between yellow ( light ) and blue ( dark ) hexagons is the exploration path produced by the exploration process.,width=226 ] when we present the discrete construction , we will encounter jordan sets @xmath7 with two e - vertices @xmath215 assigned in some way to be discussed later . such domains will have either monochromatic ( plus or minus ) boundaries or @xmath212 boundary conditions , corresponding to having both @xmath195 and @xmath209 monochromatic , but of different colors . as explained , the exploration path @xmath216 does not depend on the color of @xmath189 , but the interpretation of @xmath216 does . for domains with @xmath212 boundary conditions , the exploration path represents the interface between the yellow cluster containing the yellow portion of the s - boundary of @xmath7 and the blue cluster containing its blue portion . for domains with monochromatic blue ( resp . , yellow ) boundary conditions , the exploration path represents portions of the boundaries of yellow ( resp . , blue ) clusters touching @xmath194 and adjacent to blue ( resp . , yellow ) hexagons that are the starting point of a blue ( resp . , yellow ) path ( possibly an empty path ) that reaches @xmath193 , pasted together using portions of @xmath194 . in order to study the continuum scaling limit of an exploration path , we introduce the following definitions . [ approx ] given a jordan domain @xmath7 of the plane , we denote by @xmath217 the largest jordan set of hexagons of the scaled hexagonal lattice @xmath70 that is contained in @xmath7 , and call it the * @xmath10-approximation * of @xmath7 . it is clear that @xmath218 converges to @xmath39 in the metric ( [ distance ] ) . [ exp - path ] let @xmath7 be a jordan domain of the plane and @xmath217 its @xmath10-approximation . for @xmath107 , choose the pair @xmath219 of e - vertices in @xmath218 closest to , respectively , @xmath110 and @xmath111 ( if there are two such vertices closest to @xmath110 , we choose , say , the first one encountered going clockwise along @xmath218 , and analogously for @xmath111 ) . given a percolation configuration @xmath68 , we define the * exploration path * @xmath220 . for a fixed @xmath69 , the measure @xmath202 on percolation configurations @xmath68 induces a measure @xmath221 on exploration paths @xmath222 . in the continuum scaling limit , @xmath44 , one is interested in the weak convergence of @xmath221 to a measure @xmath223 supported on continuous curves , with respect to the uniform metric ( [ distance ] ) on continuous curves . one of the main tools in this paper is the result on convergence to @xmath0 announced by smirnov @xcite ( see also @xcite ) , whose detailed proof is to appear @xcite : _ the distribution of @xmath224 converges , as @xmath44 , to that of the trace of chordal @xmath0 inside @xmath7 from @xmath110 to @xmath111 , with respect to the uniform metric ( [ distance ] ) on continuous curves_. actually , we will rather use a slightly stronger conclusion , given as statement ( s ) at the beginning of section [ main - results ] below , a version of which , according to @xcite ( see p. 734 there ) , and @xcite , will be contained in @xcite . this stronger statement is that the convergence of the percolation process to @xmath0 takes place _ locally uniformly _ with respect to the shape of the domain @xmath7 and the positions of the starting and ending points @xmath110 and @xmath111 on its boundary @xmath39 . we will use this version of convergence to @xmath0 to identify the continuum nonsimple loop process with the scaling limit of _ all _ critical percolation clusters . a detailed proof of statement ( s ) can be found in @xcite . although the convergence statement in ( s ) is stronger than those in @xcite , we note that it is restricted to jordan domains , a restriction not present in @xcite . before concluding this section , we give one more definition . consider the exploration path @xmath225 and the set @xmath226 . the set @xmath227 is the union of its connected components ( in the lattice sense ) , which are simply connected . if the domain @xmath7 is large and the e - vertices @xmath228 are not too close to each other , then with high probability the exploration process inside @xmath217 will make large excursions into @xmath217 , so that @xmath227 will have more than one component . given a point @xmath229 contained in @xmath227 , we will denote by @xmath230 the domain corresponding to the unique element of @xmath227 that contains @xmath12 ( notice that for a deterministic @xmath231 , @xmath230 is well defined with high probability for @xmath10 small , i.e. , when @xmath232 and @xmath233 ) . next , we show how to construct , by twice using the exploration process described in section [ explo ] , a loop @xmath234 along the edges of @xmath235 corresponding to the external boundary of a monochromatic cluster contained in a large , simply connected , jordan set @xmath7 with monochromatic blue ( say ) boundary conditions ( see figures [ fig3-sec4 ] and [ fig4-sec4 ] ) . consider the exploration path @xmath236 and the sets @xmath207 and @xmath206 ( see figure [ fig3-sec4 ] ) . the set @xmath237 is the union of its connected components ( in the lattice sense ) , which are simply connected . if the domain @xmath7 is large and the e - vertices @xmath238 are chosen not too close to each other , with large probability the exploration process inside @xmath7 will make large excursions into @xmath7 , so that @xmath237 will have many components . there are four types of components which may be usefully thought of in terms of their external site boundaries : ( 1 ) those components whose site boundary contains both sites in @xmath207 and @xmath209 , ( 2 ) the analogous components with @xmath209 replaced by @xmath195 and @xmath207 by @xmath206 , ( 3 ) those components whose site boundary only contains sites in @xmath239 , and finally ( 4 ) the analogous components with @xmath207 replaced by @xmath206 . notice that the components of type 1 are the only ones with @xmath212 boundary conditions , while all other components have monochromatic s - boundaries . for a given component @xmath143 of type 1 , we can identify the two edges that separate the yellow and blue portions of its s - boundary . the vertices @xmath240 and @xmath241 of @xmath9 where those two edges intersect @xmath242 are e - vertices and are chosen to be the starting and ending points of the exploration path @xmath243 inside @xmath143 . if @xmath244 are respectively the ending and starting points of the left excursion @xmath142 of @xmath216 that created " @xmath143 , by pasting together @xmath142 and @xmath243 with the help of the edges of @xmath39 contained between @xmath240 and @xmath245 and between @xmath241 and @xmath246 , we get a loop @xmath234 which corresponds to the boundary of a yellow cluster adjacent to @xmath194 ( see figure [ fig4-sec4 ] ) . notice that the path @xmath243 in general splits @xmath143 into various other domains , all of which have monochromatic boundary conditions . to the e - vertex @xmath171 . the starting edge " and ending edge " of the exploration path are indicated by dotted segments next to @xmath170 and @xmath171 . the outer layer of hexagons does not belong to the domain where the explorations are carried out , but represents its monochromatic blue / plus external site boundary . @xmath245 and @xmath246 are the ending and starting points of a left excursion that determines a new domain @xmath143 , and @xmath240 and @xmath241 are the vertices where the edges that separate the yellow and blue portions of the s - boundary of @xmath143 intersect @xmath242 . @xmath240 and @xmath241 will be respectively the beginning and end of a new exploration path whose starting edge " and ending edge " are indicated by dotted segments next to those points.,width=302 ] to @xmath241 whose resulting path ( heavy broken line ) is pasted to the left excursion generated by the previous exploration with the help of edges ( indicated again by a heavy broken line ) of @xmath39 contained between @xmath240 and @xmath245 and between @xmath241 and @xmath246.,width=302 ] we now give the algorithmic construction for discrete percolation which is the analogue of the continuum one . each step of the construction is a single percolation exploration process ; the order of successive steps is organized as in the continuum construction detailed in section [ unit - disc ] . we start with the largest jordan set @xmath247 of hexagons that is contained in the unit disc @xmath37 . we will also make use of the countable set @xmath165 of points dense in @xmath33 that was introduced earlier . the first step consists of an exploration process inside @xmath248 . for this , we need to select two points @xmath170 and @xmath171 in @xmath249 ( which identify the starting and ending edges ) . we choose for @xmath170 the e - vertex closest to @xmath167 , and for @xmath171 the e - vertex closest to @xmath168 ( if there are two such vertices closest to @xmath167 , we can choose , say , the one with smallest real part , and analogously for @xmath168 ) . the first exploration produces a path @xmath250 and , for @xmath10 small , many new domains of all four types . these domains are ordered according to the maximal @xmath170- or @xmath171- distance @xmath173 between points on their boundaries and , if necessary , with the help of points in @xmath165 , as in the continuum case , and that order is used , at each step of the construction , to determine the next exploration process . with this choice , the exploration processes and paths are naturally ordered : @xmath251 . each exploration process of course requires choosing a starting and ending vertex and edge . for domains of type 1 , with a @xmath212 or @xmath252 boundary condition , the choice is the natural one , explained before . for a domain @xmath253 ( used at the @xmath132th step ) of type other than 1 , and therefore with a monochromatic boundary , the starting and ending edges are chosen with a procedure that mimics what is done in the continuum case . once again , the exact procedure used to choose the pair of points is not important , as long as they are not chosen too close to each other . this is clear in the discrete case because the procedure that we are presenting is only `` discovering '' the cluster boundaries . in more precise terms , it is clear that one could couple the processes obtained with different rules by means of the same percolation configuration , thus obtaining exactly the same cluster boundaries . as in the continuum case , we can choose the following procedure . ( in theorem [ thm - convergence ] we will slightly reorganize the procedure by using a coupling to the continuum construction to guarantee that the order of exploration of domains of the discrete and continuum procedures match despite the rules for breaking ties . ) given a domain @xmath7 , @xmath170 and @xmath171 are chosen so that , of all pairs @xmath176 of points in @xmath39 , they maximize @xmath177 if @xmath178 , or else they maximize @xmath179 . if the choice is not unique , to restrict the number of pairs one looks at those pairs , among the ones already obtained , that maximize the other of @xmath180 . notice that this leaves at most two pairs of points ; if that s the case , the pair that contains the point with minimal real ( and , if necessary , imaginary ) part is chosen . the procedure continues iteratively , with regions that have monochromatic boundaries playing the role played in the first step by the unit disc . every time a region with @xmath212 boundary conditions is used , a new loop , corresponding to the outer boundary contour of a cluster , is formed by pasting together , as explained in section [ single - loop ] , the new exploration path and the excursion containing the region where the last exploration was carried out . all the new regions created at a step when a loop is formed have monochromatic boundary conditions . in this section we collect our main results about the continuum nonsimple loop process . before doing that , we state a precise version , called statement ( s ) , of convergence of exploration paths to @xmath0 that we will use in the proofs of these results , presented in section [ proofs ] . statement ( s ) is an immediate consequence of theorem 5 of @xcite . the proof given in @xcite , which relies among other things on the result of smirnov @xcite concerning convergence of crossing probabilities to cardy s formula @xcite , is an expanded and corrected version of appendix a of @xcite . we note that ( s ) is both more general and more special than the convergence statements in @xcite more general in that the domain can vary with @xmath10 as @xmath44 , but more special in the restriction to jordan domains . given a jordan domain @xmath7 with two distinct points @xmath107 on its boundary , let @xmath223 denote the law of @xmath117 , the trace of chordal @xmath0 , and let @xmath221 denote the law of the percolation exploration path @xmath224 . let @xmath254 be the space of continuous curves inside @xmath7 from @xmath110 to @xmath111 . we define @xmath255 ( where @xmath256 denotes the open ball of radius @xmath257 centered at @xmath170 in the metric ( [ distance ] ) ) and denote by @xmath258 the prohorov distance ; weak convergence is equivalent to convergence in the prohorov metric . statement ( s ) is the following ; it is used in the proofs of all the results of this section _ except _ for lemmas [ sub - conv]-[boundaries ] . * for jordan domains , there is convergence in distribution of the percolation exploration path to the trace of chordal @xmath0 that is _ locally uniform _ in the shape of the boundary with respect to the uniform metric on continuous curves ( [ distance ] ) , and in the location of the starting and ending points with respect to the euclidean metric ; i.e. , for @xmath259 a jordan domain with distinct @xmath107 , @xmath260 , @xmath261 and @xmath262 such that for all @xmath263 with @xmath143 jordan and with @xmath264 and @xmath265 , @xmath266 . we first give some important results which are needed in the proofs of the main theorems . we start with two lemmas which are consequences of @xcite , of standard bounds on the probability of events corresponding to having a certain number of monochromatic crossings of an annulus ( see lemma 5 of @xcite , appendix a of @xcite , and also @xcite ) , but which do _ not _ depend on statement ( s ) . [ sub - conv ] let @xmath267 be the percolation exploration path on the edges of @xmath70 inside ( the @xmath10-approximation of ) @xmath37 between ( the e - vertices closest to ) @xmath167 and @xmath168 . for any fixed point @xmath268 , chosen independently of @xmath267 , as @xmath44 , @xmath267 and the boundary @xmath269 of the domain @xmath270 that contains @xmath12 jointly have limits in distribution along subsequences of @xmath10 with respect to the uniform metric ( [ distance ] ) on continuous curves . moreover , any subsequence limit of @xmath269 is almost surely a simple loop @xcite . [ boundaries ] using the notation of lemma [ sub - conv ] , let @xmath271 be the limit in distribution of @xmath267 as @xmath44 along some convergent subsequence @xmath272 and @xmath273 the boundary of the domain @xmath274 of @xmath275 $ ] that contains @xmath12 . then , as @xmath134 , @xmath276 converges in distribution to @xmath277 . the two lemmas above are important ingredients in the proof of theorem [ thm - convergence ] below . the second one says that , for every subsequence limit , the discrete boundaries converge to the boundaries of the domains generated by the limiting continuous curve . if we use statement ( s ) , then the limit @xmath271 of @xmath278 is the trace of chordal @xmath0 for every subsequence @xmath279 , and we can use lemmas [ boundaries ] and [ sub - conv ] to deduce that all the domains produced in the continuum construction are jordan domains . the key step in that direction is represented by the following result , our proof of which relies on ( s ) . [ jordan ] for any deterministic @xmath268 , the boundary @xmath273 of a domain @xmath274 of the continuum construction is almost surely a jordan curve . the corollary says that the domains that appear after the first step of the continuum construction are jordan domains . the steps in the second stage of the continuum construction consist of @xmath0 paths inside jordan domains , and therefore corollary [ jordan ] , combined with riemann s mapping theorem and the conformal invariance of @xmath0 , implies that the domains produced during the second stage are also jordan . by induction , we deduce that all the domains produced in the continuum construction are jordan domains . we end this section with one more lemma which is another key ingredient in the proof of theorem [ thm - convergence ] ; we remark that its proof requires ( s ) in a fundamental way . [ strong - smirnov ] let @xmath259 denote a _ jordan domain , with @xmath280 two points on @xmath39 . let @xmath281 , be a sequence of _ random _ jordan domains with points on their boundaries such that , as @xmath134 , @xmath282 converges in distribution to @xmath283 with respect to the uniform metric ( [ distance ] ) on continuous curves , and the euclidean metric on @xmath284 . for any sequence @xmath285 with @xmath279 as @xmath134 , @xmath286 converges in distribution to @xmath117 with respect to the uniform metric ( [ distance ] ) on continuous curves . in this section we state the main technical theorems of this paper . our main results , presented in section [ quickresults ] , are consequences of these theorems . the proofs of these theorems rely on statement ( s ) . as noted before , a detailed proof of statement ( s ) can be found in @xcite . [ thm - convergence ] for any @xmath287 , the first @xmath132 steps of ( a suitably reorganized version of ) the full discrete construction inside the unit disc ( of section [ full ] ) converge , jointly in distribution , to the first @xmath132 steps of the full continuum construction inside the unit disc ( of section [ unit - disc ] ) . furthermore , the scaling limit of the full ( original or reorganized ) discrete construction is the full continuum construction . moreover , if for any fixed @xmath288 we let @xmath289 denote the number of steps needed to find all the cluster boundaries of euclidean diameter larger than @xmath257 in the discrete construction , then @xmath289 is bounded in probability as @xmath44 ; i.e. , @xmath290 . this is so in both the original and reorganized versions of the discrete construction . the second part of theorem [ thm - convergence ] means that both versions of the discrete construction used in the theorem find all large contours in a number of steps which does not diverge as @xmath44 . this , together with the first part of the same theorem , implies that the continuum construction does indeed describe all macroscopic contours contained inside the unit disc ( with blue boundary conditions ) as @xmath44 . the construction presented in section [ unit - disc ] can of course be repeated for the disc @xmath16 of radius @xmath17 , for any @xmath17 , so we should take a `` thermodynamic limit '' by letting @xmath291 . in this way , we would eliminate the boundary ( and the boundary conditions ) and obtain a process on the whole plane . such an extension from the unit disc to the plane is contained in the next theorem . let @xmath292 be the ( limiting ) distribution of the set of curves ( all continuum nonsimple loops ) generated by the continuum construction inside @xmath16 ( i.e. , the limiting measure , defined by the inductive construction , on the complete separable metric space @xmath293 of collections of continuous curves in @xmath16 ) . for a domain @xmath7 , we denote by @xmath294 the mapping ( on @xmath75 or @xmath66 ) in which all portions of curves that exit @xmath7 are removed . when applied to a configuration of loops in the plane , @xmath294 gives a set of curves which either start and end at points on @xmath39 or form closed loops completely contained in @xmath7 . let @xmath295 be the same mapping lifted to the space of probability measures on @xmath75 or @xmath66 . [ thm - therm - lim ] there exists a unique probability measure @xmath296 on the space @xmath75 of collections of continuous curves in @xmath54 such that @xmath297 as @xmath291 in the sense that for every bounded domain @xmath7 , as @xmath291 , @xmath298 . we we will generally take monochromatic blue boundary conditions on the disc @xmath16 of radius @xmath17 , but this arbitrary choice does not affect the results . the next theorem states a conformal invariance property of the continuum nonsimple loop processes of theorem [ main - result1 ] . [ thm - conf - inv ] given two disjoint discs , @xmath23 and @xmath24 , let @xmath299 ( respectively , @xmath300 ) be the smallest loop from the continuum nonsimple loop process x that surrounds @xmath23 ( resp . , @xmath24 ) and let @xmath301 ( resp . , @xmath302 ) be the connected component of @xmath303 ( resp . , @xmath304 ) that contains @xmath23 ( resp . , @xmath24 ) . assume that @xmath301 and @xmath302 are disjoint and let @xmath305 , @xmath306 , denote the distribution of the loops inside @xmath307 . then , conditioned on @xmath301 and @xmath302 , the configurations inside @xmath301 and @xmath302 are independent and moreover @xmath308 ( here @xmath309 denotes the probability distribution of the loop process @xmath310 when @xmath311 is distributed by @xmath312 ) , where @xmath313 is a conformal homeomorphism from @xmath301 onto @xmath302 . we remark that the result is still valid ( without the independence ) even if @xmath301 and @xmath302 are not disjoint , but for simplicity we do not consider that case . to conclude this section , we show how to recover chordal @xmath0 from the continuum nonsimple loop process , i.e. , given a ( deterministic ) jordan domain @xmath7 with two boundary points @xmath110 and @xmath111 , we give a construction that uses the continuum nonsimple loops of @xmath296 to generate a process distributed like chordal @xmath0 inside @xmath7 from @xmath110 to @xmath111 . remember , first of all , that each continuum nonsimple loop has either a clockwise or counterclockwise direction , with the set of all loops surrounding any deterministic point alternating in direction . for convenience , let us suppose that @xmath110 is at the bottom " and @xmath111 is at the top " of @xmath7 so that the boundary is divided into a left and right part by these two points . fix @xmath288 and call @xmath314 the set of all the directed segments of loops that connect from the left to the right part of the boundary touching @xmath39 at a distance larger than @xmath257 from both @xmath110 and @xmath111 , and @xmath315 the analogous set of directed segments from the right to the left portion of @xmath39 . for a fixed @xmath288 , there is only a finite number of such segments , and , if they are ordered moving along the left boundary of @xmath7 from @xmath110 to @xmath111 , they alternate in direction ( i.e. , a segment in @xmath314 is followed by one in @xmath315 and so on ) . between a segment in @xmath315 and the next segment in @xmath314 , there are countably many portions of loops intersecting @xmath7 which start and end on @xmath39 and are maximal in the sense that they are not contained inside any other portion of loop of the same type ; they all have counterclockwise direction and can be used to make a `` bridge '' between the right - to - left segment and the next one ( in @xmath314 ) . this is done by pasting the portions of loops together with the help of points in @xmath39 and a limit procedure to produce a connected ( nonsimple ) path . if we do this for each pair of successive segments on both sides of the boundary of @xmath7 , we get a path that connects two points on @xmath39 . by letting @xmath316 and taking the limit of this procedure , since almost surely @xmath110 and @xmath111 are surrounded by an infinite family of nested loops with diameters going to zero , we obtain a path that connects @xmath110 with @xmath111 ; this path is distributed as chordal @xmath0 inside @xmath7 from @xmath110 to @xmath111 . the last claim follows from considering the analogous procedure for percolation on the discrete lattice @xmath70 , using segments of boundaries . it is easy to see that in the discrete case this procedure produces exactly the same path as the percolation exploration process . by theorems [ main - result1 ] and [ main - result2 ] , the scaling limit of this discrete procedure is the continuum one described above , therefore the claim follows from ( s ) . in this section we present the proofs of the results stated in sections [ quickresults ] and [ main - results ] . in order to do that , we will use the following lemma . [ arms ] let @xmath317 be the event that the annulus @xmath318 centered at @xmath319 contains six disjoint monochromatic crossings , not all of the same color , and let @xmath320 be the event , for some @xmath321 , that @xmath322 contains three disjoint monochromatic crossings , not all of the same color . then , for any @xmath288 , @xmath323 and @xmath324 * proof . * we know from @xcite that there exist @xmath325 and @xmath326 so that for @xmath327 , and @xmath10 small enough ( in particular , @xmath328 ) , @xmath329 for any @xmath330 . if we cover @xmath37 with @xmath331 balls of radius @xmath332 centered at @xmath333 , we have that , for @xmath334 and @xmath10 small enough , @xmath335 where the first inequality follows from the observations that for any @xmath336 , @xmath337 and @xmath338 for some @xmath339 , and the second inequality uses ( [ ksz ] ) . using the fact that @xmath331 is @xmath340 , we can let first @xmath44 and then @xmath341 to obtain ( [ six ] ) . we also know , as a consequence of lemma 5 of @xcite or as proved in appendix a of @xcite , that for any @xmath342 , the probability that the semi - annulus @xmath343 contains three disjoint monochromatic crossings , not all of the same color , is bounded above by @xmath344 for some @xmath345 and @xmath346 . ( we remark that the result still applies when @xmath347 is replaced by any other half - plane . ) since the unit disc is a convex subset of the half - plane @xmath348 and therefore the intersection of an annulus centered at @xmath167 with the unit disc @xmath37 is a subset of the intersection of the same annulus with the half - plane @xmath348 , we can use that bound to conclude that for @xmath349 , and in fact for any @xmath321 , there exists a constant @xmath350 such that @xmath351 for some @xmath346 . we can then use similar arguments to those above , together with ( [ lsw ] ) , to obtain ( [ three ] ) and conclude the proof . + * proof of lemma [ sub - conv ] . * the first part of the lemma is a direct consequence of @xcite ; it is enough to notice that the ( random ) polygonal curves @xmath267 and @xmath269 satisfy the conditions in @xcite and thus have a scaling limit in terms of continuous curves , at least along subsequences of @xmath10 . let us assume that this is not the case and that the limit @xmath352 of @xmath353 along some subsequence @xmath285 touches itself , i.e. , @xmath354 for @xmath355 with positive probability . if that happens , we can take @xmath356 small enough so that the annulus @xmath357 is crossed at least four times by @xmath352 ( here @xmath358 is the ball of radius @xmath359 centered at @xmath50 ) . because of the choice of topology , the convergence in distribution of @xmath353 to @xmath352 implies that we can find coupled versions of @xmath353 and @xmath352 on some probability space @xmath360 such that @xmath361 , for all @xmath362 as @xmath134 ( see , for example , corollary 1 of @xcite ) . using this coupling , we can choose @xmath132 large enough ( depending on @xmath363 ) so that @xmath353 stays in an @xmath364-neighborhood @xmath365 of @xmath352 . this event however would correspond to ( at least ) four paths of one color ( corresponding to the four crossings by @xmath366 , which shadows @xmath353 ) and two of the other color ( belonging to percolation clusters adjacent to the cluster of @xmath366 , and of the opposite color ) , of the annulus @xmath367 ( see , for example , @xcite see also figure [ fig - lemma5 - 1 ] ) . as @xmath368 , we can let @xmath341 , in which case the probability of seeing the event just described somewhere inside @xmath37 goes to zero by an application of lemma [ arms ] , leading to a contradiction . + * proof . * let @xmath285 be a convergent subsequence for @xmath267 and let @xmath372 be the limit in distribution of @xmath278 as @xmath134 . for simplicity of notation , in the rest of the proof we will drop the @xmath132 and write @xmath10 instead of @xmath373 . because of the choice of topology , the convergence in distribution of @xmath374 to @xmath57 implies that we can find coupled versions of @xmath375 and @xmath57 on some probability space @xmath360 such that @xmath376 , for all @xmath363 as @xmath134 ( see , for example , corollary 1 of @xcite ) . using this coupling , we first consider the case of @xmath377 such that @xmath370 but @xmath371 . since @xmath378 is an open subset of @xmath33 , there exists a continuous curve @xmath379 joining @xmath50 and @xmath51 and a constant @xmath288 such that the @xmath257-neighborhood @xmath380 of the curve is contained in @xmath378 , which implies that @xmath57 does not intersect @xmath380 . now , if @xmath375 does not intersect @xmath381 , for @xmath10 small enough , then there is a @xmath8-path @xmath188 of unexplored hexagons connecting the hexagon that contains @xmath50 with the hexagon that contains @xmath51 , and we conclude that @xmath382 . this shows that the event that @xmath370 but @xmath371 implies the existence of a curve @xmath379 whose @xmath257-neighborhood @xmath380 is not intersected by @xmath57 but whose @xmath383-neighborhood @xmath381 is intersected by @xmath375 . this implies that @xmath384 , @xmath385 such that @xmath386 . but the right hand side goes to zero for every @xmath288 as @xmath44 , which concludes the proof of one direction of the claim . to prove the other direction , we consider two points @xmath387 such that @xmath388 but @xmath389 . assume that @xmath50 is trapped before @xmath51 by @xmath57 and suppose for the moment that @xmath378 is a domain of type 3 or 4 ; the case of a domain of type 1 or 2 is analogous and will be treated later . let @xmath145 be the first time @xmath50 is trapped by @xmath57 with @xmath390 the double point of @xmath57 where the domain @xmath378 containing @xmath50 is `` sealed off . '' at time @xmath145 , a new domain containing @xmath50 is created and @xmath51 is disconnected from @xmath50 . choose @xmath288 small enough so that neither @xmath50 nor @xmath51 is contained in the ball @xmath391 of radius @xmath257 centered at @xmath392 , nor in the @xmath257-neighborhood @xmath393,\varepsilon)$ ] of the portion of @xmath57 which surrounds @xmath50 . then it follows from the coupling that , for @xmath10 small enough , there are appropriate parameterizations of @xmath57 and @xmath375 such that the portion @xmath394 $ ] of @xmath395 is inside @xmath393,\varepsilon)$ ] , and @xmath396 and @xmath397 are contained in @xmath391 . for @xmath50 and @xmath51 to be contained in the same domain in the discrete construction , there must be a @xmath8-path @xmath188 of unexplored hexagons connecting the hexagon that contains @xmath50 to the hexagon that contains @xmath51 . > from what we said in the previous paragraph , any such @xmath8-path connecting @xmath50 and @xmath51 would have to go though a `` bottleneck '' in @xmath391 ( see figure [ fig - lemma6 - 2 ] ) . assume now , for concreteness but without loss of generality , that @xmath378 is a domain of type 3 , which means that @xmath57 winds around @xmath50 counterclockwise , and consider the hexagons to the left " of @xmath394 $ ] ( these are all lightly shaded in figure [ fig - lemma6 - 2 ] ) . those hexagons form a `` quasi - loop '' around @xmath50 since they wind around it ( counterclockwise ) and the first and last hexagons are both contained in @xmath391 . the hexagons to the left of @xmath394 $ ] belong to the set @xmath398 , which can be seen as a ( nonsimple ) path by connecting the centers of the hexagons in @xmath398 by straight segments . such a path shadows @xmath375 , with the difference that it can have double ( or even triple ) points , since the same hexagon can be visited more than once . consider @xmath398 as a path @xmath399 with a given parametrization @xmath400 , chosen so that @xmath400 is inside @xmath391 when @xmath395 is , and it winds around @xmath50 together with @xmath395 . -path @xmath188 of unexplored hexagons from @xmath50 to @xmath51 having to go through a bottleneck " due to the fact that the exploration path ( heavy line ) comes close to itself . an approximate location of the continuum double point at @xmath401 is indicated by the small disc in one of the hexagons in the bottleneck area.,width=302 ] now suppose that there were two times , @xmath402 and @xmath403 , such that @xmath404 and @xmath405 $ ] winds around @xmath50 . this would imply that the `` quasi - loop '' of explored yellow hexagons around @xmath50 is actually completed , and that @xmath406 . thus , for @xmath50 and @xmath51 to belong to the same discrete domain , this can not happen . for any @xmath407 , if we take @xmath10 small enough , @xmath399 will be contained inside @xmath408 , due to the coupling . following the considerations above , the fact that @xmath50 and @xmath51 belong to the same domain in the discrete construction but to different domains in the continuum construction implies , for @xmath10 small enough , that there are four disjoint yellow @xmath8-paths crossing the annulus @xmath409 ( the paths have to be disjoint because , as we said , @xmath399 can not , when coming back to @xmath391 after winding around @xmath50 , touch itself inside @xmath391 ) . since @xmath410 is also crossed by at least two blue @xmath8-paths from @xmath411 , there is a total of at least six @xmath8-paths , not all of the same color , crossing the annulus @xmath412 . we can then use lemma [ arms ] to conclude that , if we keep @xmath257 fixed and let @xmath44 and @xmath341 , the probability to see such an event anywhere in @xmath37 goes to zero . in the case in which @xmath50 belongs to a domain of type 1 or 2 , let @xmath142 be the excursion that traps @xmath50 and @xmath413 be the point on the boundary of @xmath37 where @xmath142 starts and @xmath414 the point where it ends . choose @xmath288 small enough so that neither @xmath50 nor @xmath51 is contained in the balls @xmath415 and @xmath391 of radius @xmath257 centered at @xmath416 and @xmath392 , nor in the @xmath257-neighborhood @xmath417 of the excursion @xmath142 . because of the coupling , for @xmath10 small enough ( depending on @xmath257 ) , @xmath375 shadows @xmath57 along @xmath142 , staying within @xmath417 . if this is the case , any @xmath8-path of unexplored hexagons connecting the hexagon that contains @xmath50 with the hexagon that contains @xmath51 would have to go through one of two `` bottlenecks , '' one contained in @xmath415 and the other in @xmath391 . assume for concreteness ( but without loss of generality ) that @xmath50 is in a domain of type 1 , which means that @xmath57 winds around @xmath50 counterclockwise . if we parameterize @xmath57 and @xmath375 so that @xmath418 and @xmath419 , @xmath394 $ ] forms a `` quasi - excursion '' around @xmath50 since it winds around it ( counterclockwise ) and it starts inside @xmath420 and ends inside @xmath421 . notice that if @xmath375 touched @xmath422 , inside both @xmath420 and @xmath421 , this would imply that the `` quasi - excursion '' is a real excursion and that @xmath406 . for any @xmath407 , if we take @xmath10 small enough , @xmath375 will be contained inside @xmath408 , due to the coupling . therefore , the fact that @xmath423 implies , with probability going to one as @xmath44 , that for @xmath288 fixed and any @xmath407 , @xmath375 enters the ball @xmath424 and does not touch @xmath422 inside the larger ball @xmath425 , for @xmath426 or @xmath427 . this is equivalent to having at least two yellow and one blue @xmath8-paths ( contained in @xmath428 ) crossing the annulus @xmath429 . as @xmath44 , we can let @xmath332 go to zero ( keeping @xmath257 fixed ) and use lemma [ arms ] to conclude that the probability that such an event occurs anywhere on the boundary of the unit disc goes to zero . we have shown that , for two fixed points @xmath369 , having @xmath430 but @xmath382 or vice versa implies the occurrence of an event whose probability goes to zero as @xmath44 , and the proof of the lemma is concluded . + * proof of lemma [ boundaries ] . * as in the proof of lemma [ claim - c ] , we let @xmath285 be a convergent subsequence for @xmath267 and let @xmath372 be the limit in distribution of @xmath278 as @xmath134 , and in the rest of the proof consider coupled versions of @xmath431 and @xmath57 . let us introduce the hausdorff distance @xmath432 between two closed nonempty subsets of @xmath136 : @xmath433 with this metric , the collection of closed subsets of @xmath136 is a compact space . we will next prove that @xmath353 converges in distribution to @xmath273 as @xmath368 , in the topology induced by ( [ hausdorff - dist ] ) . ( notice that the coupling between @xmath434 and @xmath57 provides a coupling between @xmath353 and @xmath273 , seen as boundaries of domains produced by the two paths . ) we will now use lemma [ sub - conv ] and take a further subsequence @xmath435 of the @xmath373 s that for simplicity of notation we denote by @xmath436 such that , as @xmath437 , @xmath438 converge jointly in distribution to @xmath439 , where @xmath352 is a simple loop . for any @xmath288 , since @xmath352 is a compact set , we can find a covering of @xmath440 by a finite number of balls of radius @xmath383 centered at points on @xmath352 . each ball contains both points in the interior @xmath441 of @xmath352 and in the exterior @xmath442 of @xmath440 , and we can choose ( independently of @xmath443 ) one point from @xmath441 and one from @xmath442 inside each ball . once again , the convergence in distribution of @xmath444 to @xmath352 implies the existence of a coupling such that , for @xmath443 large enough , the selected points that are in @xmath441 are contained in @xmath445 , and those that are in @xmath442 are contained in the complement of @xmath446 . but by lemma [ claim - c ] , each one of the selected points that is contained in @xmath445 is also contained in @xmath274 with probability going to @xmath427 as @xmath437 ; analogously , each one of the selected points contained in the complement of @xmath446 is also contained in the complement of @xmath447 with probability going to @xmath427 as @xmath437 . this implies that @xmath273 crosses each one of the balls in the covering of @xmath352 , and therefore @xmath448 . > from this and the coupling between @xmath444 and @xmath352 , it follows immediately that , for @xmath443 large enough , @xmath449 with probability close to one . a similar argument ( analogous to the previous one but simpler , since it does not require the use of @xmath352 ) , with the roles of @xmath445 and @xmath274 inverted , shows that @xmath450 with probability going to @xmath427 as @xmath437 . therefore , for all @xmath288 , @xmath451 as @xmath437 , which implies convergence in distribution of @xmath444 to @xmath273 , as @xmath452 , in the topology induced by ( [ hausdorff - dist ] ) . but lemma [ sub - conv ] implies that @xmath444 converges in distribution ( using ( [ distance ] ) ) to a simple loop , therefore @xmath273 must also be a simple loop ; and we have convergence in the topology induced by ( [ distance ] ) . it is also clear that the argument above is independent of the subsequence @xmath453 ( and of the original subsequence @xmath272 ) , so the limit of @xmath269 is unique and coincides with @xmath273 . hence , we have convergence in distribution of @xmath269 to @xmath273 , as @xmath44 , in the topology induced by ( [ distance ] ) , and indeed joint convergence of @xmath454 to @xmath455 . + * proof of corollary [ jordan ] . * the corollary follows immediately from lemma [ sub - conv ] and lemma [ boundaries ] , as already seen in the proof of lemma [ boundaries ] . + * proof of lemma [ strong - smirnov ] . * first of all recall that the convergence of @xmath282 to @xmath283 in distribution implies the existence of coupled versions of @xmath282 and @xmath283 on some probability space @xmath360 such that @xmath456 , @xmath457 , @xmath458 for all @xmath363 as @xmath134 ( see , for example , corollary 1 of @xcite ) . this immediately implies that the conditions to apply rad s theorem ( see theorem [ rado - thm ] of section [ rado ] ) are satisfied . let @xmath128 be the conformal map that takes the unit disc @xmath37 onto @xmath459 with @xmath460 and @xmath461 , and let @xmath41 be the conformal map from @xmath37 onto @xmath7 with @xmath462 and @xmath131 . then , by theorem [ rado - thm ] , @xmath128 converges to @xmath41 uniformly in @xmath136 , as @xmath134 . let @xmath57 ( resp . , @xmath463 ) be the chordal @xmath0 inside @xmath7 ( resp . , @xmath459 ) from @xmath110 to @xmath111 ( resp . , from @xmath464 to @xmath465 ) , @xmath466 , @xmath467 , @xmath468 , and @xmath469 , @xmath470 , @xmath471 . we note that , because of the conformal invariance of chordal @xmath0 , @xmath352 ( resp . , @xmath472 ) is distributed as chordal @xmath0 in @xmath37 from @xmath473 to @xmath474 ( resp . , from @xmath475 to @xmath476 ) . since @xmath477 and @xmath478 for all @xmath363 , and @xmath135 uniformly in @xmath136 , we conclude that @xmath479 and @xmath480 for all @xmath363 . later we will prove a `` continuity '' property of @xmath0 ( lemma [ continuity ] ) that allows us to conclude that , under these conditions , @xmath472 converges in distribution to @xmath352 in the uniform metric ( [ distance ] ) on continuous curves . once again , this implies the existence of coupled versions of @xmath472 and @xmath352 on some probability space @xmath481 such that @xmath482 , for all @xmath363 as @xmath134 . therefore , thanks to the convergence of @xmath128 to @xmath41 uniformly in @xmath136 , @xmath483 , for all @xmath363 as @xmath134 . but since @xmath484 is distributed as @xmath485 and @xmath486 is distributed as @xmath117 , we conclude that , as @xmath134 , @xmath485 converges in distribution to @xmath117 in the uniform metric ( [ distance ] ) on continuous curves . we now note that ( s ) implies that , as @xmath44 , @xmath487 converges in distribution to @xmath485 _ uniformly _ in @xmath132 , for @xmath132 large enough . therefore , as @xmath134 , @xmath286 converges in distribution to @xmath117 , and the proof is concluded . [ continuity ] let @xmath488 be the unit disc , @xmath110 and @xmath111 two distinct points on its boundary , and @xmath57 the trace of chordal @xmath0 inside @xmath37 from @xmath110 to @xmath111 . let @xmath489 and @xmath490 be two sequences of points in @xmath491 such that @xmath492 and @xmath493 . then , as @xmath134 , the trace @xmath463 of chordal @xmath0 inside @xmath37 from @xmath464 to @xmath465 converges in distribution to @xmath57 in the uniform topology ( [ distance ] ) on continuous curves . * let @xmath494 be the ( unique ) linear fractional transformation that takes the unit disc @xmath37 onto itself , mapping @xmath110 to @xmath464 , @xmath111 to @xmath465 , and a third point @xmath495 distinct from @xmath110 and @xmath111 to itself . @xmath496 and @xmath497 depend continuously on @xmath464 and @xmath465 . as @xmath134 , since @xmath492 and @xmath493 , @xmath128 converges uniformly to the identity in @xmath136 . using the conformal invariance of chordal @xmath0 , we couple @xmath463 and @xmath57 by writing @xmath498 . the uniform convergence of @xmath128 to the identity implies that @xmath499 as @xmath134 , which is enough to conclude that @xmath463 converges to @xmath57 in distribution . + * proof of theorem [ thm - convergence ] . * let us prove the second part of the theorem first . we will do this for the original version of the discrete construction , but essentially the same proof works for the reorganized version we will describe below , as we will explain later . suppose that at step @xmath132 of this discrete construction an exploration process @xmath500 is run inside a domain @xmath501 , and write @xmath502 , where @xmath503 are the maximal connected domains of unexplored hexagons into which @xmath501 is split by removing the set @xmath504 of hexagons explored by @xmath500 . let @xmath505 and @xmath506 be respectively the maximal @xmath170- and @xmath171-distances between pairs of points in @xmath507 . suppose , without loss of generality , that @xmath508 , and consider the rectangle @xmath509 ( see figure [ fig3-thm1 ] ) whose vertical sides are aligned to the @xmath171-axis , have length @xmath505 , and are each placed at @xmath170-distance @xmath510 from points of @xmath507 with minimal or maximal @xmath170-coordinate in such a way that the horizontal sides of @xmath509 have length @xmath510 ; the bottom and top sides of @xmath509 are placed in such a way that they are at equal @xmath171-distance from the points of @xmath507 with minimal or maximal @xmath171-coordinate , respectively . it follows from the russo - seymour - welsh lemma @xcite ( see also @xcite ) that the probability to have two vertical @xmath8-crossings of @xmath509 of different colors is bounded away from zero by a positive constant @xmath512 that does not depend on @xmath10 ( for @xmath10 small enough ) . if that happens , then @xmath513 . the same argument of course applies to the maximal @xmath171-distance when @xmath514 . we can summarize the above observation in the following lemma . [ smaller ] suppose that at step @xmath132 of the full discrete construction an exploration process @xmath500 is run inside a domain @xmath501 . if @xmath515 , then for @xmath10 small enough ( i.e. , @xmath516 for some constant @xmath517 ) , @xmath518 with probability at least @xmath512 independent of @xmath10 . the same holds for the maximal @xmath171-distances when @xmath519 . here is another lemma that will be useful later on . ( for an example of the phenomenon described in the lemma , see figure [ fig2-sec4 ] , and assume that the unexplored hexagons there are all blue ; then the s - boundary of the small domain made of a single blue hexagon and that of the blue domain to the northeast share exactly two adjacent yellow hexagons . ) [ daughters ] two daughter " subdomains , @xmath520 and @xmath521 , either have disjoint s - boundaries , or else their common s - boundary consists of exactly two adjacent hexagons ( of the same color ) where the exploration path @xmath500 came within @xmath522 hexagons of touching itself just when completing the s - boundary of one of the two subdomains . * * suppose that the two daughter subdomains have s - boundaries @xmath523 and @xmath524 that are not disjoint and let @xmath525 be the set of ( sites of @xmath8 that are the centers of the ) hexagons that belong to both s - boundaries . @xmath526 can be partitioned into subsets consisting of single hexagons that are not adjacent to any another hexagon in @xmath526 and groups of hexagons that form simple @xmath8-paths ( because the s - boundaries of the two subdomains are simple @xmath8-loops ) . let @xmath527 be such a subset of hexagons of @xmath526 that form a simple @xmath8-path @xmath528 . then there is a @xmath8-path @xmath529 of hexagons in @xmath523 that goes from @xmath530 to @xmath531 without using any other hexagon of @xmath532 and a different @xmath8-path @xmath533 in @xmath524 that goes from @xmath531 to @xmath530 without using any other hexagon of @xmath532 . but then , all the hexagons in @xmath532 other than @xmath530 and @xmath531 are surrounded " by @xmath534 and therefore can not have been explored by the exploration process that produced @xmath520 and @xmath521 , and can not belong to @xmath523 or @xmath524 , leading to a contradiction , unless @xmath535 . similar arguments lead to a contradiction if @xmath526 is partitioned into more than one subset . if @xmath536 is not adjacent to any other hexagon in @xmath526 , then it is adjacent to two other hexagons of @xmath523 and two hexagons of @xmath524 . since @xmath184 has only six neighbors and neither the two hexagons of @xmath523 adjacent to @xmath184 nor those of @xmath524 can be adjacent to each other , each hexagon of @xmath523 is adjacent to one of @xmath524 . but then , as before , @xmath184 is surrounded " by @xmath537 and therefore can not have been explored by the exploration process that produced @xmath520 and @xmath521 , and can not belong to @xmath523 or @xmath524 , leading once again to a contradiction . the proof is now complete , since the only case remaining is the one where @xmath526 consists of a single pair of adjacent hexagons as stated in the lemma . + with these lemmas , we can now proceed with the proof of the second part of the theorem . lemma [ smaller ] tells us that large domains are chopped " with bounded away from zero probability ( @xmath538 ) , but we need to keep track of domains of diameter larger than @xmath257 in such a way as to avoid double counting " as the lattice construction proceeds . more accurately , we will keep track of domains @xmath539 having @xmath540 , since only these can have diameter larger than @xmath257 . to do so , we will associate with each domain @xmath539 having @xmath540 that we encounter as we do the lattice construction a non - negative integer label . the first domain is @xmath541 ( see the beginning of section [ full ] ) and this gets label @xmath427 . after each exploration process in a domain @xmath539 with @xmath540 , if the number @xmath542 of daughter " subdomains @xmath543 with @xmath544 is @xmath545 , then the label of @xmath539 is no longer used , if instead @xmath546 , then one of these @xmath542 subdomains ( chosen by any procedure e.g. , the one with the highest priority for further exploration ) is assigned the _ same _ label as @xmath539 and the rest are assigned the next @xmath547 integers that have never before been used as labels . note that once all domains have @xmath548 , there are no more labelled domains . * proof . * except for @xmath248 , every domain comes with ( at least ) a physically correct " monochromatic half - boundary " ( notice that we are considering s - boundaries and that a half - boundary coming from the artificially colored " boundary of @xmath248 is not considered a physically correct monochromatic half - boundary ) . let us assume , without loss of generality , that @xmath551 . if we associate with each label the last " ( in terms of steps of the discrete construction ) domain which used that label ( its daughter subdomains all had @xmath548 ) , then we claim that it follows from lemma [ daughters ] that ( with high probability ) any two such last domains that are labelled have disjoint s - boundaries . this is a consequence of the fact that the two domains are subdomains of two ancestors " that are distinct daughter subdomains of the _ same _ domain ( possibly @xmath248 ) and whose s - boundaries are therefore ( by lemma [ daughters ] ) either disjoint or else overlap at a pair of hexagons where an exploration path had a close encounter of distance two hexagons with itself . but since we are dealing only with macroscopic domains ( of diameter at least order @xmath257 ) , such a close encounter would imply , like in lemmas [ sub - conv ] and [ boundaries ] , the existence of six crossings , not all of the same color , of an annulus whose outer radius can be kept fixed while the inner radius is sent to zero together with @xmath10 . the probability of such an event goes to zero as @xmath44 and hence the unit disc @xmath37 contains , with high probability , at least @xmath549 disjoint monochromatic @xmath8-paths of diameter at least @xmath552 , corresponding to the physically correct half - boundaries of the @xmath549 labelled domains . now take the collection of squares @xmath553 of side length @xmath554 centered at the sites @xmath555 of a scaled square lattice @xmath556 of mesh size @xmath332 , and let @xmath557 be the number of squares of side @xmath332 needed to cover the unit disc . let @xmath558 and consider the event @xmath559 , which implies that , with high probability , the unit disc contains at least @xmath560 disjoint monochromatic @xmath8-paths of diameter at least @xmath552 and that , for at least one @xmath561 , the square @xmath562 intersects at least six disjoint monochromatic @xmath8-paths of diameter larger that @xmath552 , so that the annulus " @xmath563 is crossed by at least six disjoint monochromatic @xmath8-paths contained inside the unit disc . if all these @xmath8-paths crossing @xmath563 have the same color , say blue , then since they are portions of boundaries of domains discovered by exploration processes , they are shadowed " by exploration paths and therefore between at least one pair of blue @xmath8-paths , there is at least one yellow @xmath8-path crossing @xmath563 . therefore , whether the original monochromatic @xmath8-paths are all of the same color or not , @xmath563 is crossed by at least six disjoint monochromatic @xmath8-paths not all of the same color contained in the unit disc . let @xmath564 denote the @xmath565 as @xmath44 of the probability that such an event happens anywhere inside the unit disc . we have shown that the event @xmath559 implies a six - arms " event unless not all labelled domains have disjoint s - boundaries . but the latter also implies a six - arms " event , as discussed before ; therefore @xmath566 since @xmath567 , bounds in @xcite imply that , for @xmath257 fixed , @xmath568 as @xmath341 , which shows that @xmath569 and concludes the proof of the lemma . + now , let @xmath570 denote the number of distinct domains that had label @xmath168 ( this is equal to the number of steps that label @xmath168 survived ) . let us also define @xmath571 to be the smallest integer @xmath572 such that @xmath573 and @xmath574 to be the random variable corresponding to how many bernoulli trials ( with probability @xmath512 of success ) it takes to have @xmath575 successes . then , we may apply ( sequentially ) lemma [ smaller ] to conclude that for any @xmath168 @xmath576 where @xmath577 is an independent copy of @xmath574 . now let @xmath578 be i.i.d . random variables equidistributed with @xmath579 . let @xmath580 be the number of steps needed so that all domains left to explore have @xmath581 . then , for any positive integer @xmath582 , @xmath583 notice that , for fixed @xmath582 , @xmath584 as @xmath585 . moreover , for any @xmath586 , by lemma [ labels ] , we can choose @xmath587 large enough so that @xmath588 . so , for any @xmath586 , it follows that @xmath589 which implies that @xmath590 to conclude this part of the proof , notice that the discrete construction can not `` skip '' a contour and move on to explore its interior , so that all the contours with diameter larger than @xmath257 must have been found by step @xmath132 if all the domains present at that step have diameter smaller than @xmath257 . therefore , @xmath591 , which shows that @xmath289 is bounded in probability as @xmath44 . + for the first part of the theorem , we need to prove , for any fixed @xmath287 , joint convergence in distribution of the first @xmath132 steps of a suitably reorganized discrete construction to the first @xmath132 steps of the continuum one . later we will explain why this reorganized construction has the same scaling limit as the one defined in section [ full ] . for each @xmath132 , the first @xmath132 steps of the reorganized discrete construction will be coupled to the first @xmath132 steps of the continuum one with suitable couplings in order to obtain the convergence in distribution of those steps of the discrete construction to the analogous steps of the continuum one ; the proof will proceed by induction in @xmath132 . we will explain how to reorganize the discrete construction as we go along ; in order to explain the idea of the proof , we will consider first the cases @xmath592 , @xmath522 and @xmath593 , and then extend to all @xmath594 . + @xmath592 . the first step of the continuum construction consists of an @xmath0 @xmath62 from @xmath167 to @xmath168 inside @xmath37 . correspondingly , the first step of the discrete construction consists of an exploration path @xmath250 inside @xmath428 from the e - vertex closest to @xmath167 to the e - vertex closest to @xmath168 . the convergence in distribution of @xmath250 to @xmath62 is covered by statement ( s ) . + @xmath595 . the convergence in distribution of the percolation exploration path to chordal @xmath0 implies that we can couple @xmath250 and @xmath62 generating them as random variables on some probability space @xmath360 such that @xmath596 for all @xmath363 as @xmath134 ( see , for example , corollary 1 of @xcite ) . now , let @xmath23 be the domain generated by @xmath62 that is chosen for the second step of the continuum construction , and let @xmath597 be the highest ranking point of @xmath165 contained in @xmath23 . for @xmath10 small enough , @xmath598 is also contained in @xmath428 ; let @xmath599 be the unique connected component of the set @xmath600 containing @xmath598 ( this is well - defined with probability close to @xmath427 for small @xmath10 ) ; @xmath601 is the domain where the second exploration process is to be carried out . > from the proof of lemma [ boundaries ] , we know that the boundaries @xmath602 and @xmath603 of the domains @xmath601 and @xmath23 produced respectively by the path @xmath604 and @xmath62 are close with probability close to one for @xmath10 small enough . for the next step of the discrete construction , we choose the two e - vertices @xmath605 and @xmath606 in @xmath602 that are closest to the points @xmath607 and @xmath608 of @xmath603 selected for the coupled continuum construction ( if the choice is not unique , we can select the e - vertices with any rule to break the tie ) and call @xmath609 the percolation exploration path inside @xmath610 from @xmath605 to @xmath606 . it follows from @xcite that @xmath611 converge jointly in distribution along some subsequence to some limit @xmath612 . we already know that @xmath613 is distributed like @xmath62 and we can deduce from the joint convergence in distribution of @xmath614 to @xmath615 ( lemma [ boundaries ] ) , that @xmath616 is distributed like @xmath603 . therefore , if we call @xmath63 the @xmath0 path inside @xmath23 from @xmath607 to @xmath608 , lemma [ strong - smirnov ] implies that @xmath617 is distributed like @xmath63 and indeed that , as @xmath44 , @xmath618 converge jointly in distribution to @xmath619 . + @xmath620 . so far , we have proved the convergence in distribution of the ( paths and boundaries produced in the ) first two steps of the discrete construction to the ( paths and boundaries produced in the ) first two steps of the discrete construction . the third step of the continuum construction consists of an @xmath0 path @xmath621 from @xmath622 to @xmath623 , inside the domain @xmath24 with highest priority after the second step has been completed . let @xmath624 be the highest ranking point of @xmath165 contained in @xmath24 , @xmath625 the domain of the discrete construction containing @xmath626 after the second step of the discrete construction has been completed ( this is well defined with probability close to @xmath427 for small @xmath10 ) , and choose the two e - vertices @xmath627 and @xmath628 in @xmath629 that are closest to the points @xmath630 and @xmath631 of @xmath632 selected for the coupled continuum construction ( if the choice is not unique , we can select the e - vertices with any rule to break the tie ) . the third step of the discrete construction consists of an exploration path @xmath633 from @xmath627 to @xmath628 inside @xmath625 . it follows from @xcite that @xmath634 converge jointly in distribution along some subsequence to some limit @xmath635 . we already know that @xmath613 is distributed like @xmath62 , @xmath636 like @xmath603 and @xmath617 like @xmath63 , and we would like to apply lemma [ strong - smirnov ] to conclude that @xmath637 is distributed like @xmath621 and indeed that , as @xmath44 , @xmath638 converges in distribution to @xmath639 . in order to do so , we have to first show that @xmath640 is distributed like @xmath632 . if @xmath641 is a subset of @xmath642 , this follows from lemma [ boundaries ] , as in the previous case , but if the s - boundary of @xmath641 contains hexagons of @xmath643 , then we can not use lemma [ boundaries ] directly , although the proof of the lemma can be easily adapted to the present case , as we now explain . indeed , the only difference is in the proof of claim ( c ) and is due to the fact that , when dealing with a domain of type 1 or 2 , we can not use the bound on the probability of three disjoint crossings of a semi - annulus because the domains we are dealing with may not be convex ( like the unit disc ) . on the other hand , the discrete domains like @xmath610 and @xmath641 where we have to run exploration processes at various steps of the discrete construction are themselves generated by previous exploration processes , so that any hexagon of the s - boundary of such a domain has three adjacent hexagons which are the starting points of three disjoint @xmath8-paths ( two of one color and one of the other ) . two of these @xmath8-paths belong to the s - boundary of the domain , while the third belongs to the adjacent percolation cluster ( see figure [ fig2-thm1 ] ) . this allows us to use the bound on the probability of _ six _ disjoint crossings of an annulus . to the left of the exploration path indicated by a heavy line , has three neighbors that are the starting points of two disjoint yellow @xmath8-paths ( denoted 1 and 2 ) belonging to the s - boundary of @xmath644 and one blue @xmath8-path ( denoted 3 ) belonging to the adjacent percolation cluster.,width=302 ] to see this , let @xmath645 be the @xmath8-paths contained in the s - boundary of the discrete domain ( i.e. , @xmath610 in the present context ) and @xmath646 the @xmath8-path belonging to the adjacent cluster , all starting from hexagons adjacent to some hexagon @xmath214 ( centered at @xmath50 ) in the s - boundary of @xmath610 . for @xmath647 and @xmath10 small enough , let @xmath648 be the event that the exploration path @xmath649 enters the ball @xmath650 without touching @xmath651 inside the larger ball @xmath652 . @xmath648 implies having ( at least ) three disjoint @xmath8-paths ( two of one color and one of the other ) , @xmath653 and @xmath654 , contained in @xmath610 and crossing the annulus @xmath655 , with @xmath653 and @xmath654 disjoint from @xmath645 and @xmath646 . hence , @xmath648 implies the event that there are ( at least ) six disjoint crossings ( not all of the same color ) of the annulus @xmath655 . once claim ( c ) is proved , the rest of the proof of lemma [ boundaries ] applies to the present case . therefore , we have convergence in distribution of @xmath629 to @xmath632 , which allows us to use lemma [ strong - smirnov ] and conclude that @xmath656 converges in distribution to @xmath657 . + @xmath658 . we proceed by induction in @xmath132 , iterating the steps explained above ; there are no new difficulties ; all steps for @xmath659 are analogous to the case @xmath620 . + to conclude the proof of the theorem , we need to show that the scaling limit of the original full discrete construction defined in section [ full ] is the same as that of the reorganized one just used in the proof of the first part of the theorem . in order to do so , we can couple the two constructions by using the same percolation configuration for both , so that the two constructions have at their disposal the same set of loops to discover . we proved above that the original discrete construction finds _ all _ the macroscopic " loops , so we have to show that this is true also for the reorganized version of the discrete construction . this is what we will do next , using essentially the same arguments as those employed for the original discrete construction ; we present these arguments for the sake of completeness since there are some changes . consider the reorganized discrete construction described above , where the starting and ending points of the exploration processes at each step are chosen to be close to those of the corresponding ( coupled ) continuum construction . suppose that at step @xmath132 of this discrete construction an exploration process @xmath500 is run inside a domain @xmath501 , and write @xmath502 , where @xmath503 are the connected domains into which @xmath501 is split by the set @xmath504 of hexagons explored by @xmath500 . let @xmath660 ( resp . , @xmath505 ) and @xmath661 ( resp . , @xmath506 ) be respectively the maximal @xmath170- and @xmath171-distance between pairs of points in @xmath662 ( resp . , @xmath507 ) . if @xmath508 and the e - vertices on @xmath507 are chosen to be closest to two points of @xmath662 with maximal @xmath170-distance , then the same construction and argument spelled out earlier in the first part of the proof ( corresponding to the second part of the theorem ) show that @xmath513 with bounded away from zero probability . if the e - vertices on @xmath507 are chosen to be closest to two points of @xmath662 with maximal @xmath170-distance but @xmath663 , then consider the rectangle @xmath664 whose vertical sides are aligned to the @xmath171-axis , have length @xmath506 , and are each placed at the same @xmath170-distance from the points of @xmath507 with minimal or maximal @xmath170-coordinate in such a way that the horizontal sides of @xmath664 have length @xmath665 ; the bottom and top sides of @xmath664 are placed in such a way that they touch the points of @xmath507 with minimal or maximal @xmath171-coordinate , respectively . notice that , because of the coupling between the continuum and discrete constructions , for any @xmath666 , for @xmath132 large enough , @xmath667 and @xmath668 . since in the case under consideration we have @xmath669 and @xmath670 , for @xmath10 large enough , we must also have @xmath671 . once again , it follows from the russo - seymour - welsh lemma that the probability to have two vertical @xmath8-crossings of @xmath664 of different colors is bounded away from zero by a positive constant that does not depend on @xmath10 ( for @xmath10 small enough ) . if that happens , then @xmath672 . all other cases are handled in the same way , implying that the maximal @xmath170- and @xmath171-distances of domains that appear in the discrete construction have a positive probability ( bounded away from zero ) to decrease by ( approximately ) a factor @xmath673 at each step of the discrete construction in which an exploration process is run in that domain . with this result at our disposal , the rest of the proof , that for any @xmath288 the number of steps needed to find all the loops of diameter larger than @xmath257 is bounded in probability as @xmath44 ( which implies that _ all _ the macroscopic " loops are discovered ) , proceeds exactly like for the original discrete construction . + * proof of theorem [ thm - therm - lim ] . * first of all , we want to show that @xmath674 does not depend on @xmath17 , provided @xmath7 is strictly contained in @xmath16 and @xmath675 . in order to do this , we assume that the above conditions are satisfied for the pair @xmath676 and show that @xmath677 for all @xmath678 . take two copies of the scaled hexagonal lattice , @xmath11 and @xmath679 , their dual lattices @xmath680 and @xmath681 , and two percolation configurations , @xmath682 and @xmath683 , both with blue boundary conditions and coupled in such a way that @xmath684 . the laws of the boundaries of @xmath68 and @xmath685 are also coupled , in such a way that the boundaries or portions of boundaries contained inside @xmath7 are identical for all small enough @xmath10 . therefore , letting @xmath44 and using the convergence of the percolation boundaries inside @xmath16 and @xmath686 to the continuum nonsimple loop processes @xmath292 and @xmath687 respectively , we conclude that @xmath677 . > from what we have just proved , it follows that the probability measures @xmath688 on @xmath689 , for @xmath690 , satisfy the consistency conditions @xmath691 for all @xmath692 . since @xmath66 , @xmath75 are complete separable metric spaces , the measurable spaces @xmath689 , @xmath693 are standard borel spaces and so we can apply kolmogorov s extension theorem ( see , for example , @xcite ) and conclude that there exists a unique probability measure on @xmath693 with @xmath694 for all @xmath690 . it follows that , for @xmath695 and all @xmath7 strictly contained in @xmath16 and such that @xmath675 , @xmath696 , which concludes the proof . + * proof of theorems [ main - result1 ] and [ main - result2 ] . * these are immediate consequences of theorems [ thm - convergence ] and [ thm - therm - lim ] , where the full scaling limit is intended in the topology induced by ( [ hausdorff - d ] ) . + * proof of theorem [ features ] . * _ 1 . _ the fact that the continuum nonsimple loop process is a random collection of noncrossing continuous loops is a direct consequence of its definition . the fact that the loops touch themselves is a consequence of their being constructed out of @xmath0 , while the fact that they touch each other follows from the observation that a chordal @xmath0 path @xmath117 touches @xmath39 with probability one . therefore , each new loop in the continuum construction touches one or more previous ones ( many times ) . the nonexistence of triple points follows directly from lemma 5 of @xcite on the number of crossings of an annulus , combined with theorem [ main - result1 ] , which allows to transport discrete results to the continuum case . in fact , a triple point would imply , for discrete percolation , at least six crossings ( not all of the same color ) of an annulus whose ratio of inner to outer radius goes to zero in the scaling limit , leading to a contradiction . _ 3 . _ combining russo - seymour - welsh type arguments for percolation ( see , for example , lemma 3 of @xcite ) with theorem [ main - result1 ] , we know that @xmath296-a.s . there exists a ( random ) @xmath697 , with @xmath698 , such that @xmath16 is surrounded by a continuum nonsimple loop contained in @xmath699 . > from ( the proof of ) theorem [ thm - therm - lim ] , we also know that @xmath700 for all @xmath701 . this implies that by taking @xmath702 large enough and performing the continuum construction inside @xmath686 , we have a positive probability of generating a loop @xmath703 contained in the annulus @xmath704 , with @xmath705 . if that is the case , all the loops contained inside @xmath16 are connected , by construction , to the loop @xmath703 surrounding @xmath16 by a finite sequence ( a `` path '' ) of loops ( remember that in the continuum construction each loop is generated by pasting together portions of @xmath0 paths inside domains whose boundaries are determined by previously formed loops or excursions ) . therefore , any two loops contained inside @xmath16 are connected to each other by a path " of loops . using again the fact that @xmath700 for all @xmath701 , and letting first @xmath702 and then @xmath706 go to @xmath707 , we see from the discussion above ( with @xmath291 as well ) that any two loops are connected by a finite path " of intermediate loops , @xmath296-a.s . + * proof of theorem [ thm - conf - inv ] . * combining russo - seymour - welsh type arguments for percolation ( see , for example , lemma 3 of @xcite ) with theorem [ main - result1 ] , we know that @xmath296-a.s . there exists a bounded continuum nonsimple loop that surrounds both @xmath299 and @xmath300 , so that @xmath301 and @xmath302 are both bounded . we can then take @xmath708 such that @xmath299 and @xmath300 ( and therefore @xmath301 and @xmath302 ) are both contained in the disc @xmath16 with probability tending to @xmath427 as @xmath291 . consider now the continuum construction inside the disc @xmath16 for some large @xmath17 . let @xmath709 ( resp . , @xmath710 ) be the smallest loop surrounding @xmath23 ( resp . , @xmath24 ) produced by the construction and let @xmath711 ( resp . , @xmath712 ) be the connected component of @xmath713 ( resp . , @xmath714 ) that contains @xmath23 ( resp . , @xmath24 ) . it follows from the previous observation and from ( the proof of ) theorem [ thm - therm - lim ] that as @xmath291 , @xmath711 ( resp . , @xmath712 ) is ( with probability tending to @xmath427 ) distributed like @xmath301 ( resp . , @xmath302 ) and moreover the loop configuration inside @xmath711 ( resp . , @xmath712 ) is distributed by @xmath312 ( resp . , @xmath715 ) . this already proves the first claim of the theorem , since it is clear from the continuum construction inside @xmath16 that the loop configurations inside @xmath711 and @xmath712 are independent . it also means that in order to complete the proof of theorem , it suffices to prove the second claim for the case of the continuum construction inside @xmath16 , for all large @xmath17 . in order to do that , we consider a modified discrete construction inside @xmath16 , as explained below . in view of the above observations , we take @xmath17 large and condition on the existence inside @xmath16 of two disjoint loops , @xmath716 and @xmath717 , surrounding @xmath23 and @xmath24 respectively , and let @xmath718 ( resp . , @xmath719 ) be the domain of @xmath720 ( resp . , @xmath721 ) containing @xmath23 ( resp . , @xmath24 ) . the modified discrete construction inside @xmath16 is analogous to the ordinary " one except inside the domains @xmath718 and @xmath719 , where the the exploration paths are coupled to a continuum construction inside the unit disc in the following way . roughly speaking , the discrete construction inside @xmath718 is one in which the @xmath722 pairs ( the starting and ending points of the exploration paths ) at each step are chosen to be closest to the @xmath723 points in @xmath718 mapped from the unit disc @xmath724 via @xmath725 , where the pairs @xmath284 are those that appear at the corresponding steps of the continuum construction inside @xmath724 and @xmath725 is a certain conformal map from @xmath724 onto @xmath718 , as specified below . the discrete construction inside @xmath719 is coupled in the same way to the _ same _ continuum construction inside @xmath37 via a certain conformal map @xmath726 from @xmath724 onto @xmath719 . the conformal map @xmath725 will be defined for @xmath10 sufficiently small and is specified in the following way . we fix a point @xmath727 in @xmath711 and denote by @xmath728 the unique conformal map from @xmath37 onto @xmath711 such that @xmath729 and @xmath730 . for @xmath10 sufficiently small , so that @xmath727 is contained in @xmath718 , we let @xmath725 be the unique conformal map from @xmath37 onto @xmath718 such that @xmath731 and @xmath732 . we also denote by @xmath733 the unique conformal map from @xmath37 onto @xmath712 such that @xmath734 and @xmath735 , where @xmath736 is any fixed conformal map from @xmath711 to @xmath712 . note that , by the uniqueness part of riemann s mapping theorem , we can conclude that @xmath737 . for @xmath10 sufficiently small , so that @xmath738 is contained in @xmath719 , we let @xmath726 be the unique conformal map from @xmath37 onto @xmath719 such that @xmath739 and @xmath740 . as @xmath44 , @xmath741 and @xmath742 , and by an application of rad s theorem ( theorem [ rado - thm ] ) , ( the continuous extensions of ) @xmath725 and @xmath726 converge uniformly in @xmath136 to the ( continuous extensions of ) @xmath728 and @xmath733 respectively . we now describe more precisely the modified construction inside @xmath718 . let @xmath62 be the first @xmath0 path in @xmath37 from @xmath607 to @xmath608 ; because of the conformal invariance of @xmath0 , the image @xmath743 of @xmath62 under @xmath725 is a path distributed as the trace of chordal @xmath0 in @xmath718 from @xmath744 to @xmath745 . the uniform convergence of @xmath725 to @xmath728 and statement ( s ) imply that the exploration path @xmath250 inside @xmath718 from @xmath605 to @xmath606 , chosen to be closest to @xmath744 and @xmath745 respectively , converges in distribution to @xmath746 , as @xmath44 , which means that there exists a coupling so that the paths @xmath250 and @xmath743 stay close for @xmath10 small . one can use the same strategy as in the proof of the first part of theorem [ thm - convergence ] , and obtain a discrete construction whose exploration paths are coupled to the @xmath0 paths @xmath747 that are the images of the paths @xmath463 in @xmath37 . then , for this discrete construction inside @xmath718 , the scaling limit of the exploration paths will be paths inside @xmath711 distributed as the images of the @xmath0 paths in @xmath37 under the conformal map @xmath728 . analogously , for the discrete construction inside @xmath719 , the scaling limit of the exploration paths will be paths inside @xmath712 distributed as the images of the @xmath0 paths in @xmath37 under the ( continuous extension of the ) conformal map @xmath748 which is the uniform limit of @xmath726 as @xmath44 . therefore , the path inside @xmath712 obtained as the scaling limit of an exploration path at a given step of the construction inside @xmath719 is the image under the conformal map @xmath749 of the path inside @xmath711 obtained as the scaling limit of the exploration path at corresponding step of the construction inside @xmath718 . in order to conclude the proof , we have to show that the discrete constructions inside @xmath750 and @xmath751 defined above find all the boundaries ( with diameter greater than @xmath257 ) in a number of steps that is bounded in probability as @xmath44 . this is as in the second part of theorem [ thm - convergence ] , but since we are now dealing with a modified construction inside general jordan domains , we need to show that we can reach the same conclusion . in order to do so , we will use the fact that the modified construction is coupled to an ordinary " continuum construction in the unit disc . we work out the details only for @xmath718 , since the proof is the same for @xmath719 . > from the second part of theorem [ thm - convergence ] it follows that , for any fixed @xmath752 and @xmath753 , the probability that the number of steps of the continuum construction in @xmath37 that are necessary to ensure that only domains with diameter less than @xmath754 are present is larger than @xmath517 , goes to zero as @xmath585 . since @xmath725 ( can be extended to a function that ) is continuous in the compact set @xmath136 , @xmath725 is uniformly continuous and so we can choose @xmath755 such that any subdomain of @xmath37 of diameter at most @xmath756 is mapped by @xmath725 to a subdomain of @xmath718 of diameter at most @xmath257 . since @xmath757 , as @xmath44 , where @xmath728 ( can be extended to a function that ) is continuous in the compact set @xmath136 and is therefore uniformly continuous , we can choose @xmath758 such that any subdomain of @xmath37 of diameter at most @xmath759 is mapped by @xmath725 to a subdomain of @xmath711 of diameter at most @xmath257 , and moreover such that @xmath760 . this , combined with the coupling between @xmath0 paths and exploration paths inside @xmath539 , assures that the number of steps necessary for the new discrete construction inside @xmath718 to find all the loops of diameter at least @xmath257 is bounded in probability as @xmath44 . therefore , the scaling limit , as @xmath44 , of the modified discrete constructions for @xmath718 and @xmath719 give the measures @xmath761 and @xmath762 , and it follows by construction that @xmath763 for _ any _ conformal map @xmath736 from @xmath711 onto @xmath712 . since this is true for all large @xmath17 , by letting @xmath291 we can conclude that @xmath308 . * acknowledgements . * we are grateful to greg lawler , oded schramm and wendelin werner for various interesting and useful conversations and to stas smirnov for communications about a paper in preparation . f. c. thanks wendelin werner for an invitation to universit paris - sud 11 , and vincent beffara and luiz renato fontes for many helpful discussions . we thank michael aizenman , lai - sang young and an anonymous referee for comments about the presentation of our results . f. c. and c. m. n. acknowledge respectively the kind hospitality of the courant institute and of the vrije universiteit amsterdam where part of this and related work was done . m. aizenman , scaling limit for the incipient spanning clusters , in _ mathematics of multiscale materials ; the i m a volumes in mathematics and its applications _ ( k. golden , g. grimmett , r. james , g. milton and p. sen , eds . ) , springer ( 1998 ) . p. d. seymour , d. j. a. welsh , percolation probabilities on the square lattice , in _ advances in graph theory _ ( b. bollobs ed . ) , annals of discrete mathematics * 3 * , north - holland , amsterdam , pp . 227 - 245 ( 1978 ) . s. smirnov , critical percolation in the plane . i. conformal invariance and cardy s formula . ii . continuum scaling limit . ( long version of @xcite , dated nov . 15 , 2001 ) , available at http://www.math.kth.se/@xmath765stas/papers/index.html . Abstract:

Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.

Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered . Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video . Paper: a growing body of evidence suggests that the stellar population of the galactic nucleus is distinct from that of the bulge . surface brightness measurements from the nir to the fir show that in contrast to the bulge , the central few hundred parsecs of the galaxy are dominated by a flat , disk - like distribution of stars , gas , and dust @xcite . this difference is also reflected in the kinematics : oh / ir stars in the central hundred parsecs show higher rotational velocities than expected for an inner single - component , bulge population @xcite . evidence for ongoing star formation also distinguishes the nucleus from the bulge . the galactic bulge is composed primarily of an old starburst - like population formed early , some 710 gyr ago @xcite . in contrast , the galactic nucleus harbors substantial young and intermediate - age stellar populations . intermediate - age populations have been most commonly inferred from broad - band photometry @xcite . star formation tracers have also been used to study intermediate - age populations , including young supergiants and luminous agbs , which trace 10 myr - 1 gyr populations @xcite , and oh / ir stars , which trace 1 - 3 gyr populations @xcite . the young stellar populations in the galactic nucleus have been the subject of much recent work . these populations are predominantly concentrated in three young , massive clusters : the arches and quintuplet clusters ( figer et al . 1999 , 2002 ; stolte et al . 2005 , and references therein ) , approximately 30 - 50 pc in projected distance from the galactic center , and the central cluster , located within the central parsec ( krabbe et al . 1991 , 1995 ; paumard et al . 2006 , and references therein ) . star formation in the nucleus is thought to be ultimately linked to the inward transport of gas induced by the galactic bar @xcite . however , precisely how gas is funneled from the outer galaxy to the nucleus and how this process affects the resultant star formation , remains poorly known . at present , there is a concentration of molecular gas 2 - 8 pc from the galctic center termed the circumnuclear disk @xcite . if such a structure routinely fuels star formation in the central parsec , the stars formed in this region may represent an entirely distinct population from the arches and quintpulet clusters or the intermediate age populations found throughout the @xmath5200 pc nucleus . dynamical effects due to the supermassive black hole ( genzel et al . 2003 , ghez et al . 2005 , and references therein ) and the large stellar and remnant density in the central parsec may also lead to population differences between the central cluster and that in the larger nucleus , either prior to star formation or afterwards . a number of investigators have attempted to address the nature of the central cluster and its relationship to the larger 100 - 300 pc nucleus . most recently , @xcite investigated the properties of the young stellar population in the central parsec , spectroscopically identifying nearly 100 ob and wolf - rayet stars . they find that the majority of the young stars reside in two , inclined and counter - rotating disks , suggesting in situ star formation in dense gas accretion disks . studies of the older stellar population in the central parsec have been primarily limited to broadband photometry . they have suggested that the fraction of low mass stars in the population increases with distance from the center , perhaps due to dynamical mass segregation @xcite . a detailed analysis , however , of the late - type giant population requires spectroscopy , owing to the large scatter in extinction near the galactic center and the intrinsic variations in giant star colors . @xcite pioneered work in this area , using spectroscopic and photometric observations of the most luminous giants and supergiants ( 50% complete at @xmath610 mag . ) to construct an h - r diagram for stars in the inner 5 pc . they report that the gc star formation rate in the central few parsecs is largely similar to that of the bulge . specifically , they find that the majority of stars formed more than 5 gyr ago , though they also find evidence that significant star formation also occurred during the past 100 myr . however , their conclusions are limited by their bright magnitude limit , which samples only short - lived evolutionary stages , for which theoretical models are uncertain . in this paper , we build on the work of @xcite in an effort to better characterize the late - type giant population within the central parsec . we report deep photometric and spectroscopic observations of 329 late - type giants in the gc , complete to 50% at @xmath615.5 mag . our observations for the first time include the helium - burning red clump , as well as the red giant branch and asymptotic giant branch . this improved magnitude limit allows for the most robust picture of the galactic center star formation history to date , as these stars are much better understood than the supergiants and luminous agb stars studied by @xcite . in 2 , we present our observations and the techniques used to construct the hertzsprung - russell ( h - r ) diagram . section 3 discusses the resulting h - r diagram and implications for the gc star - formation history . we discuss our results in 4 and conclude with 5 . we observed eight galactc center fields between march and september 2006 using the integral field spectrometer spiffi @xcite in conjunction with the macao adaptive optics module @xcite mounted on the sinfoni eso vlt facility . we observed these fields for the dual purpose of identifiying main sequence b stars outside the central parsec ( martins et al . 2007b , in prep ) and gathering spectroscopic observations for a large number of late - type giants . we chose fields with a radial distance from sgr a@xmath8 of less than @xmath9 arcsec , selecting regions outside the minispiral to avoid nebular contamination in brackett @xmath10 , and choosing fields north of sgr a@xmath8 to minimize separation from the ao guide star . we also avoided regions with extremely bright stars ( @xmath11 ) . as stars this bright are relatively rare , the selection bias in avoiding these stars is negligible . if the fields had instead been chosen at random , we expect no more than a few @xmath11 stars would be selected . we observed each selected sinfoni field in 50 @xmath12 100 mas pixel mode , resulting in 0.2 arcsec resolution and a @xmath13 field of view . we simultaneously observed all fields in @xmath2 and @xmath14 band , leading to a spectral resolution of r @xmath15 1500 . figure [ mos ] displays the location of the observed fields . the total exposure time for all fields was 4200 s , except for the fields at ( 17@xmath16 , 17@xmath16 ) , ( 5@xmath16 , 11@xmath16 ) , and ( -8@xmath16 , 8@xmath16 ) , which had total exposure times of 6600 s , 7200 s , and 2400 s , respectively . the fields span a range in projected distance from sgr a * of 4 arcsec to 26 arcsec . a histogram of the observed stellar positions is shown in figure [ dist_hist ] . we reduced the raw data using a standard procedure to perform flat - fielding , sky subtraction , and wavelength calibration @xcite . following extraction , we removed the stellar continua by dividing by a second degree polynomial fitted to the line - free regions of the stellar spectra . the normalized spectra allow us to directly compare the vlt spectra to the normalized catalog spectra in @xcite and @xcite . a typical resultant gc @xmath14 band spectrum following normalization is shown in figure [ spectrum ] . three template spectra from the @xcite spectral library are also shown for comparison . to classify the stars in our sample , we used the @xmath17co 2.2935 @xmath18 m , @xmath19 rovibrational band head , the strongest feature in our spectra and a well - known @xmath7 indicator , for a given luminosity class @xcite . we use only this feature , as it is largely free of nebular and telluric lines , making it more reliable than other @xmath20 and @xmath21band signatures in our spectra . we note that in contrast to the work of @xcite , we do not need the h+k band h@xmath22o feature to reliably predict effective temperatures , as our sample consists only of giants with @xmath2310.3 ( see 2.2 ) . due to their rarity , stars sufficiently bright to be supergiant or long period variable candidates are not contained in our sample . m co index ( see text for definition ) as a function of temperature for the comparison stars taken from the @xcite and @xcite catalogs . the solid line is a least - squares fit to both data sets for stars with 17 @xmath24 co @xmath25 3 . ] to define a @xmath7 - @xmath17co index relation , we computed the co index defined by @xcite . although not as well - known as other co indices ( e.g. equivalent width , photometric indices of @xcite ) , @xcite showed that this index correlates well with other co indices . furthermore , it has the advantage of being insensitive to small variations in the nearby continuum because it does not require a fit to the continuum . the index is defined as co % = [ ( 1 @xmath26 f@xmath27 f@xmath28 ) @xmath12 100 ) ] , where both bands are 0.015 @xmath18 m wide and the continuum and co band centers are defined as 2.284 @xmath18 m and 2.302 @xmath18 m , respectively . we note that although we adopt the same definition for the co index as @xcite , our spectra are normalized while theirs are not , and thus , our computed indices are not directly comparable to theirs . we calculated uncertainties in the computed indices , assuming the noise is dominated by photon statistics of the source and background and that the uncertainty in the band is approximately equal to that of the nearby continuum . following @xcite , we used co strength to estimate effective temperatures for the cool giants in our gc sample . to define a co index versus @xmath7 relation , we used a set of archival comparison star spectra taken from @xcite and @xcite with well - determined effective temperatures given in the literature . in an effort to avoid systematic errors in our derived index@xmath26@xmath7 relation , we used a large number of references , assuming temperatures derived from a wide variety of methods . a summary of the comparison star data is given in table [ comp_table ] , and the resulting relationship between co index and @xmath7 is shown in figure [ comp_relation ] . the @xcite and @xcite relationships are in very good agreement with each other ( for stars in common , @xmath29co @xmath30 ) , suggesting that the co index is largely independent of resolution or observing system . the relation is tightest for co @xmath31 . as no stars in our gc sample have computed indicies exceding this value , we did not include comparison stars with co @xmath32 in our fit . the resulting index-@xmath7 relation using both empirical data sets is : @xmath33 @xmath7 = 3.7351 @xmath26 0.0060 @xmath12 co @xmath26 0.00040 @xmath12 co@xmath34 , for all stars with measured indices @xmath35 co @xmath25 3 . the errors in the derived coefficients are 0.0092 , 0.0022 , and 1.2@xmath36 , respectively . llllllll hr 7001 & a0 va & wh & 1.760 & 0.004 & 9420 & 60 & @xcite + hr 4295 & a1 v & wh & 1.434 & 0.003 & 9600 & 25 & @xcite + hr 5054 & a1 vp & wh & 1.823 & 0.004 & 8760 & 260 & @xcite + hr 6378 & a2 v & wh & 1.953 & 0.004 & 8690 & 78 & @xcite + hr 4534 & a3 v & wh & 1.695 & 0.005 & 8857 & 185 & @xcite + hr 4357 & a4 v & wh & 1.516 & 0.007 & 8243 & 150 & @xcite + hr 7557 & a7 v & wh & 1.147 & 0.004 & 7500 & 200 & @xcite + hr 2943 & f5 iv - v & wh & 1.176 & 0.014 & 6532 & 39 & @xcite + hr 6927 & f7 v & wh & 1.219 & 0.014 & 6087 & 22 & @xcite + hr 4375 & f8.5 v & wh & 1.540 & 0.015 & 5676 & 66 & @xcite + hr 21 & f2 iii & wh & 1.563 & 0.011 & 6847 & 137 & @xcite + hr 403 & a5 iii - iv & wh & 1.828 & 0.008 & 8420 & 360 & @xcite + hr 1412 & a7 iii & wh & 1.554 & 0.007 & 7690 & 320 & @xcite + hr 1457 & k5@xmath37 iii & wh & 12.633 & 0.023 & 3866 & 35 & @xcite + hr 2985 & g8 iii & wh & 5.540 & 0.018 & 5001 & 56 & @xcite + hr 3003 & k4 iii & wh & 13.944 & 0.023 & 3961 & 99 & @xcite + hr 3323 & g5 iiia & wh & 3.045 & 0.017 & 5136 & 88 & @xcite + & & kh & 3.039 & 0.007 & & + hr 4031 & f0 iii & wh & 2.145 & 0.011 & 6880 & 150 & @xcite + hr 4069 & m0 iii & wh & 14.143 & 0.021 & 3730 & 149 & @xcite + hr 4517 & m1 iii & wh & 13.894 & 0.019 & 3828 & 53 & @xcite + hr 4883 & g0 iiip & wh & 1.819 & 0.014 & 5747 & 54 & @xcite + & & kh & 1.377 & 0.007 & & + hr 5017 & f3 iii & wh & 1.395 & 0.017 & 7141 & 181 & @xcite + hr 5340 & k1.5 iiip & wh & 10.997 & 0.021 & 4233 & 55 & @xcite + hr 6299 & k2 iii & wh & 8.653 & 0.020 & 4571 & 100 & @xcite + & & kh & 8.530 & 0.009 & & + hr 6703 & g8.5 iii & wh & 4.426 & 0.020 & 5011 & 35 & @xcite + hr 6705 & k5 iii & wh & 12.859 & 0.023 & 3934 & 42 & @xcite + & & kh & 12.569 & 0.010 & & + hr 7635 & m0@xmath26 iii & wh & 13.035 & 0.025 & 3867 & 50 & @xcite + & & kh & 12.869 & 0.010 & & + hr 7806 & k2.5 iii & wh & 9.993 & 0.022 & 4286 & 100 & @xcite + & & kh & 9.785 & 0.010 & & + hr 7886 & m6 iii & wh & 16.722 & 0.025 & 3243 & 79 & @xcite + hr 8317 & k0.5 iii & wh & 7.319 & 0.024 & 4658 & 19 & @xcite + hr 8694 & k0@xmath26 iii & wh & 6.691 & 0.021 & 4830 & 100 & @xcite + & & kh & 6.463 & 0.010 & & + hr 8905 & f8 iii & wh & 1.265 & 0.014 & 5942 & 42 & @xcite + & & kh & 0.797 & 0.007 & & + swvir & m7 iii & wh & 18.350 & 0.024 & 2966 & 36 & @xcite + & & kh & 18.033 & 0.008 & & + bkvir & m7@xmath26 iii & wh & 20.449 & 0.022 & 2944 & 34 & @xcite + & & kh & 20.730 & 0.006 & & + rxboo & m7.5 - 8 iii & wh & 18.262 & 0.024 & 2786 & 46 & @xcite + [ comp_table ] in order to separate cool giants from warmer giants and main sequence stars , warm stars with co @xmath38 3 are removed from the sample . of the 355 detected stars in our spectroscopy , 329 were categorized as co - absorbers , and we assigned effective temperatures to these stars using the above index@xmath26@xmath7 relation . prior to temperature calculation , we cross - correlated all co - absorbing stars with a co - template in order to remove radial velocities . errors in temperatures were estimated based on the noise in each spectrum and the intrinsic dispersion in our index@xmath26@xmath7 relation ( @xmath39 = 0.0050 ) . as noted by @xcite , errors determined in this way are strictly only lower limits . the spectral classification and analysis of the remaining early - type ( non - co - absorbing ) stars in our sample is less straight - forward @xcite , and we defer analysis of these stars to a later paper ( martins et al . 2007b , in prep ) . we made photometric observations using the imaging system naos / conica ( naco ) , consisting of the adaptive optics system naos @xcite and the nir camera conica @xcite at the 8.2-m ut4 ( yepun ) of the eso vlt . in april 2006 , we collected several ao - corrected images in each of @xmath2 and @xmath3 band with a pixel size of @xmath40 27 mas . the total exposure time was 64 s for each band , broken into thirty - two dithered images , in which every fourth image was separated from the previous exposure by 16 arcsec . we used our standard reduction pipeline to perform sky subtraction , bad pixel corrections , flat field corrections , and stacking of images to create final mosaics . in figure [ mos ] , we display a sub - section of the final @xmath3 band mosaic , containing all stars analyzed in this paper . photometry was extracted for only this region to help ensure psf constancy across the image . we used the crowded field photometry package starfinder @xcite to establish relative photometry and source detection . an empirical psf for the central core ( fwhm @xmath41 0.10 arcsec ) was extracted from each image using seven bright , isolated stars . the full radial extent of the extracted psf was r @xmath41 0.19 arcsec . to derive the photometric curve of growth needed to place these results on an absolute scale , we adopted the mtf - fitting technique of @xcite . this technique fits the power spectrum of the image using a combination of the source spatial distribution function determined by starfinder and a parameterized description of the modulation transfer functions ( mtf ) of the atmosphere , telescope , ao system , and science camera . the advantage of this technique is that it derives the psf encircled energy curve of growth , including the extended , seeing - limited halo , and thus provides the aperture correction required for absolute photometric calibration . in deriving the curve of growth from the data themselves , we avoid systematic calibration errors introduced from using a psf standard acquired at a different time and under different observing conditions than the target data . given the rapid variations in ao performance @xcite , this technique is crucial for deriving accurate absolute photometry . the mtf - fitting technique has so far only been applied to data obtained for the keck observatory lgsao system @xcite . to apply this technique to the vlt images , we used the @xcite software with appropriate input parameters for the vlt telescope pupil size and geometry , the camera platescale and pixel size , and the deformable mirror actuator spacing . the software uses the idl procedure mpfit to perform a levenberg - marquardt least - squares fit of the parameterized model mtf to the data . the best fits to the @xmath2 and @xmath3 band image power spectra are shown in figure [ pspec ] . the spatial frequency , @xmath42 , is normalized relative to the telescope cutoff frequency in the image plane ( d@xmath43 ) . band data are aliased , and we therefore , fit only the power spectrum for @xmath44 ( see 2.2 ) . the spatial frequency , @xmath42 , is normalized relative to the cutoff frequency in the image plane ( d@xmath43 ) . the strehl ratios implied by these fits are 10@xmath45% and 19@xmath46% , for @xmath2 and @xmath3 band , respectively . ] all images , even seeing - limited images , contain power up to the spatial frequency cutoff , which is @xmath47 for a circular pupil . to faithfully record all spatial information allowed by the telescope aperture , the pixel sampling frequency must therefore satisfy @xmath48 ( see @xcite for a detailed discussion ) . the @xmath3 band data are nyquist - sampled : @xmath49 = 1 . however , the h - band data are undersampled : @xmath50 . this aliasing causes power at frequencies @xmath51 to corrupt frequencies @xmath52 . the contamination of frequencies between 0.52 and @xmath50.7 is negligible , as the power aliased to these frequencies consists only of detector and background noise . this power is orders of magnitude less than the non - aliased power at these spatial frequencies , and thus , has very little effect on the total power spectrum . on the other hand , the aliased power for contaminated spatial frequencies @xmath53 is of the same order - of - magnitude as the non - aliased power , so the power spectrum at these frequencies is heavily influenced by the aliasing . we , therefore , chose only to fit the power spectrum for all spatial frequencies @xmath54 . as only detector and background noise contribute to the power spectrum for spatial frequencies @xmath55 , we are excluding very little information about the psf . the relatively minor discrepency in figure [ pspec ] between the model and data power spectra in @xmath3 band is likely due to uncertainties in the deformable mirror influence function , as an explicit description of the vlt cilas mirror influence function was not available . we , therefore , used the approximate influence function for the keck xinetics mirror from @xcite . the overall power spectra fits are satisfactory , and we do not expect that the photometric accuracy of our technique is significantly affected by this choice . the strehl ratios implied by the psfs reconstructed from the fits in figure [ pspec ] are 10% and 19% , for @xmath2 and @xmath3 band , respectively . to test the integrity of these fits , we divided the images into nine subimages and fit the power spectrum of each subimage . this process yielded fairly consistent results for all subimages , implying an error in the @xmath2 and @xmath3 band strehl ratios of 0.5% and 1.0% , respectively . this agreement between subimages suggests that psf variations due to variable distance from the guide star and variable exposure time in the final mosaic are only present at a low level . we determined the photometric zero point from observations of the near - ir standard star 9178 @xcite , obtained on the same night . the measured atmospheric extinction coefficients used to correct for the difference in airmass between our standard stars and science targets were 0.06 mag . airmass@xmath56 for @xmath2 and 0.07 mag . airmass@xmath56 for @xmath3 . we derived photometric errors and completeness using the standard technique of inserting and recovering artificial stars of specified magnitude . completeness is not uniform , so we calculated errors and completeness separately for each spectral field . to avoid artificially crowding our images , we inserted only fifty stars at a time to each spectral subimage and repeated this procedure five times for each magnitude bin . we computed the photometric error at each magnitude using a gaussian fit to the difference between the input and recovered magnitudes . figure [ comp_err ] shows the average photometric errors and completeness at each magnitude bin . also shown is the spectroscopic completeness , estimated by comparing the number of stars detected in the @xmath2 and @xmath57 band photometry to the number detected in the sinfoni data . the incompleteness in the sinfoni data at @xmath613 - 15 mag . is caused by crowding and confusion with nearby bright stars in the field of view . and @xmath3 band photometric errors and completeness based on the artificial star tests described in 2 . the spectroscopic completeness is estimated based on the number of co - stars for which we could extract spectra , compared to the total number of stars detected in the photometry . ] using the derived photometry and effective temperatures presented in the preceding section , we are able to place our gc sample on the hertzsprung - russell ( h - r ) diagram . to convert the measured photometric magnitudes to luminosity , we use models that assume the @xmath14 band magnitudes are measured in the johnson - cousins - glass system @xcite . therefore , we first transformed the measured @xmath3 magnitudes to the johnson - cousins - glass system , using the approximate transformations given in @xcite , assuming the naco and 2mass @xmath58 color systems are identical , as in @xcite . we next adopted empirical bolometric corrections of @xcite for m stars and theoretical corrections of girardi 2005 ( http://pleiadi / pd.astro.it ) for hotter stars . for the theoretical corrections , we assumed a solar metallicity and a surface gravity of @xmath59 , though the results are largely independent of these assumptions . for all temperatures in the galactic center sample , we found systematic differences @xmath60 mag . in bc@xmath61 for @xmath62=1.0 $ ] dex and @xmath63 dex , leading to systematic differences in the luminosity of @xmath64 . additionally , we assumed a distance to the galactic center of 8.0 kpc @xcite . there has been much recent debate concerning the precise distance to the galactic center . however , the choice of distance has only a small systematic effect on our derived luminosities ; a change in distance of @xmath65 kpc induces a change in luminosity of @xmath66 . finally , we corrected each star s luminosity individually for extinction using the photometric color , the derived @xmath7 , and the interstellar extinction law of @xcite , derived from nicmos observations of galactic center stars . all results are tabulated in table [ gc_table ] . lccccccccccccc 1 & 6.26 & 6.24 & 15.275 & 0.042 & 17.419 & 0.072 & 8.28 & 3.658 & 0.006 & 2.99 & 0.15 & 1.88 & 0.06 + 2 & 6.32 & 6.05 & 15.259 & 0.042 & 17.316 & 0.072 & 8.30 & 3.658 & 0.007 & 2.86 & 0.15 & 1.83 & 0.07 + 3 & 5.67 & 5.91 & 14.898 & 0.031 & 17.051 & 0.056 & 6.93 & 3.674 & 0.004 & 3.03 & 0.11 & 2.09 & 0.05 + 4 & 5.67 & 6.13 & 14.239 & 0.013 & 16.344 & 0.049 & 8.61 & 3.654 & 0.006 & 2.93 & 0.09 & 2.25 & 0.04 + 5 & 5.51 & 6.24 & 15.304 & 0.042 & 17.438 & 0.072 & 7.01 & 3.673 & 0.005 & 3.00 & 0.15 & 1.91 & 0.06 + 6 & 5.02 & 6.48 & 15.531 & 0.042 & 17.826 & 0.204 & 7.15 & 3.672 & 0.008 & 3.23 & 0.37 & 1.91 & 0.15 + 7 & 4.86 & 6.29 & 15.131 & 0.031 & 17.274 & 0.072 & 7.01 & 3.673 & 0.007 & 3.01 & 0.14 & 1.98 & 0.06 + 8 & 4.99 & 6.16 & 15.327 & 0.042 & 17.406 & 0.072 & 7.34 & 3.669 & 0.005 & 2.91 & 0.15 & 1.86 & 0.06 + 9 & 4.75 & 6.13 & 15.503 & 0.042 & 17.678 & 0.072 & 8.76 & 3.652 & 0.006 & 3.03 & 0.15 & 1.78 & 0.06 + 10 & 4.35 & 6.34 & 15.474 & 0.042 & 17.135 & 0.056 & 6.82 & 3.675 & 0.004 & 2.30 & 0.12 & 1.57 & 0.05 + 11 & 4.35 & 6.51 & 15.240 & 0.031 & 17.387 & 0.072 & 6.69 & 3.677 & 0.004 & 3.02 & 0.14 & 1.96 & 0.06 + 12 & 3.54 & 6.56 & 14.318 & 0.017 & 16.427 & 0.049 & 7.73 & 3.665 & 0.005 & 2.95 & 0.09 & 2.26 & 0.04 + 13 & 3.56 & 6.40 & 13.803 & 0.013 & 15.707 & 0.012 & 9.40 & 3.643 & 0.005 & 2.62 & 0.03 & 2.27 & 0.02 + 14 & 3.48 & 6.13 & 14.969 & 0.031 & 16.899 & 0.056 & 6.90 & 3.675 & 0.005 & 2.70 & 0.11 & 1.93 & 0.05 + 15 & 3.08 & 6.13 & 12.132 & 0.003 & 14.305 & 0.006 & 11.62 & 3.611 & 0.005 & 2.96 & 0.02 & 2.99 & 0.01 + 16 & 3.05 & 5.83 & 14.123 & 0.013 & 16.226 & 0.042 & 8.65 & 3.653 & 0.006 & 2.93 & 0.08 & 2.30 & 0.04 + 17 & 2.81 & 5.86 & 15.867 & 0.078 & 17.802 & 0.204 & 8.77 & 3.652 & 0.005 & 2.67 & 0.39 & 1.49 & 0.16 + 18 & 3.27 & 5.62 & 15.596 & 0.042 & 17.751 & 0.204 & 9.25 & 3.645 & 0.007 & 2.99 & 0.37 & 1.71 & 0.15 + 19 & 2.78 & 5.32 & 15.115 & 0.031 & 17.234 & 0.056 & 9.20 & 3.646 & 0.007 & 2.94 & 0.11 & 1.88 & 0.05 + 20 & 4.35 & 5.18 & 11.399 & 0.002 & 13.519 & 0.003 & 12.10 & 3.604 & 0.005 & 2.87 & 0.01 & 3.23 & 0.01 + 21 & 4.78 & 5.37 & 14.438 & 0.017 & 16.735 & 0.049 & 9.71 & 3.639 & 0.004 & 3.19 & 0.09 & 2.24 & 0.04 + 22 & 5.13 & 5.51 & 15.436 & 0.042 & 17.641 & 0.072 & 8.55 & 3.655 & 0.004 & 3.08 & 0.15 & 1.84 & 0.06 + 23 & 4.97 & 5.10 & 15.341 & 0.042 & 17.335 & 0.072 & 10.09 & 3.634 & 0.005 & 2.74 & 0.15 & 1.68 & 0.06 + 24 & 5.53 & 4.54 & 14.770 & 0.031 & 17.054 & 0.056 & 6.77 & 3.676 & 0.006 & 3.22 & 0.11 & 2.22 & 0.05 + 25 & 5.10 & 3.46 & 14.078 & 0.013 & 15.666 & 0.012 & 8.31 & 3.658 & 0.005 & 2.17 & 0.03 & 2.02 & 0.02 + 26 & 5.16 & 3.67 & 15.087 & 0.031 & 17.025 & 0.056 & 9.92 & 3.636 & 0.011 & 2.66 & 0.12 & 1.76 & 0.06 + 27 & 5.45 & 3.91 & 15.316 & 0.042 & 17.369 & 0.072 & 10.07 & 3.634 & 0.007 & 2.82 & 0.15 & 1.73 & 0.06 + 28 & 5.08 & 4.18 & 13.152 & 0.005 & 15.121 & 0.006 & 10.32 & 3.631 & 0.006 & 2.69 & 0.02 & 2.53 & 0.02 + 29 & 5.13 & 4.51 & 13.238 & 0.005 & 15.345 & 0.012 & 10.91 & 3.622 & 0.005 & 2.88 & 0.02 & 2.55 & 0.02 + 30 & 5.05 & 4.70 & 13.980 & 0.013 & 16.298 & 0.049 & 12.37 & 3.600 & 0.007 & 3.16 & 0.09 & 2.30 & 0.04 + 31 & 4.56 & 4.56 & 13.382 & 0.009 & 15.542 & 0.012 & 8.63 & 3.653 & 0.004 & 3.01 & 0.03 & 2.63 & 0.02 + 32 & 4.29 & 4.29 & 15.536 & 0.042 & 17.606 & 0.072 & 7.99 & 3.662 & 0.004 & 2.89 & 0.15 & 1.74 & 0.06 + 33 & 4.59 & 4.13 & 16.137 & 0.078 & 18.223 & 0.204 & 5.27 & 3.692 & 0.003 & 2.95 & 0.39 & 1.61 & 0.16 + 34 & 4.40 & 3.48 & 13.845 & 0.013 & 15.739 & 0.012 & 8.65 & 3.653 & 0.006 & 2.62 & 0.03 & 2.28 & 0.02 + 35 & 4.24 & 3.70 & 13.676 & 0.009 & 15.619 & 0.012 & 7.61 & 3.666 & 0.005 & 2.71 & 0.03 & 2.42 & 0.02 + 36 & 4.32 & 3.02 & 13.194 & 0.005 & 15.295 & 0.012 & 9.46 & 3.642 & 0.005 & 2.91 & 0.02 & 2.63 & 0.02 + 37 & 3.00 & 3.32 & 12.562 & 0.003 & 14.834 & 0.006 & 3.70 & 3.707 & 0.004 & 3.24 & 0.01 & 3.20 & 0.01 + 38 & 3.11 & 3.83 & 15.976 & 0.078 & 18.227 & 0.204 & 9.31 & 3.645 & 0.008 & 3.13 & 0.39 & 1.61 & 0.16 + 39 & 3.62 & 3.56 & 15.106 & 0.031 & 17.234 & 0.056 & 5.89 & 3.686 & 0.004 & 3.00 & 0.11 & 2.03 & 0.05 + 40 & 4.02 & 3.97 & 15.532 & 0.042 & 17.603 & 0.072 & 7.97 & 3.662 & 0.006 & 2.89 & 0.15 & 1.74 & 0.06 + 41 & 3.62 & 4.05 & 15.160 & 0.031 & 17.431 & 0.072 & 9.04 & 3.648 & 0.005 & 3.17 & 0.14 & 1.96 & 0.06 + 42 & 2.92 & 4.13 & 12.738 & 0.003 & 15.117 & 0.006 & 12.73 & 3.594 & 0.005 & 3.23 & 0.02 & 2.82 & 0.02 + 43 & -6.97 & 10.15 & 15.030 & 0.026 & 16.988 & 0.058 & 8.98 & 3.649 & 0.008 & 2.71 & 0.11 & 1.83 & 0.05 + 44 & -7.24 & 10.31 & 14.751 & 0.026 & 16.765 & 0.058 & 7.28 & 3.670 & 0.006 & 2.82 & 0.11 & 2.05 & 0.05 + 45 & -7.10 & 9.85 & 15.112 & 0.026 & 17.048 & 0.058 & 5.96 & 3.685 & 0.006 & 2.72 & 0.11 & 1.91 & 0.05 + 46 & -7.32 & 9.88 & 15.075 & 0.026 & 17.022 & 0.058 & 6.46 & 3.680 & 0.006 & 2.73 & 0.11 & 1.91 & 0.05 + 47 & -7.94 & 9.88 & 15.494 & 0.040 & 17.295 & 0.060 & 4.70 & 3.698 & 0.006 & 2.53 & 0.13 & 1.72 & 0.06 + 48 & -8.99 & 10.12 & 13.124 & 0.005 & 15.144 & 0.008 & 10.30 & 3.631 & 0.008 & 2.77 & 0.02 & 2.57 & 0.02 + 49 & -8.80 & 9.67 & 15.374 & 0.040 & 17.408 & 0.060 & 7.61 & 3.666 & 0.009 & 2.84 & 0.13 & 1.80 & 0.06 + 50 & -9.29 & 9.37 & 15.199 & 0.026 & 17.210 & 0.058 & 8.72 & 3.652 & 0.007 & 2.79 & 0.11 & 1.81 & 0.05 + 51 & -8.69 & 9.21 & 15.156 & 0.026 & 17.093 & 0.058 & 6.25 & 3.682 & 0.006 & 2.71 & 0.11 & 1.88 & 0.05 + 52 & -7.45 & 9.37 & 11.937 & 0.003 & 13.686 & 0.002 & 5.88 & 3.686 & 0.004 & 2.44 & 0.01 & 3.07 & 0.01 + 53 & -5.59 & 9.21 & 10.319 & 0.002 & 12.222 & 0.002 & 11.08 & 3.619 & 0.008 & 2.58 & 0.02 & 3.59 & 0.02 + 54 & -6.75 & 8.80 & 15.448 & 0.040 & 17.392 & 0.060 & 6.35 & 3.681 & 0.005 & 2.72 & 0.13 & 1.76 & 0.06 + 55 & -6.75 & 8.56 & 15.948 & 0.090 & 18.090 & 0.245 & 6.47 & 3.679 & 0.008 & 3.02 & 0.46 & 1.68 & 0.19 + 56 & -6.18 & 8.18 & 15.273 & 0.040 & 17.416 & 0.060 & 8.85 & 3.651 & 0.009 & 2.98 & 0.13 & 1.85 & 0.06 + 57 & -6.29 & 8.07 & 15.706 & 0.040 & 17.964 & 0.245 & 8.91 & 3.650 & 0.007 & 3.15 & 0.44 & 1.74 & 0.18 + 58 & -6.10 & 7.86 & 15.506 & 0.040 & 17.688 & 0.060 & 4.64 & 3.699 & 0.005 & 3.10 & 0.13 & 1.94 & 0.06 + 59 & -5.97 & 7.29 & 15.037 & 0.026 & 17.188 & 0.058 & 4.32 & 3.702 & 0.008 & 3.05 & 0.11 & 2.12 & 0.05 + 60 & -6.16 & 6.43 & 13.182 & 0.005 & 15.300 & 0.009 & 7.56 & 3.667 & 0.008 & 2.97 & 0.02 & 2.73 & 0.02 + 61 & -6.51 & 6.64 & 15.628 & 0.040 & 17.772 & 0.245 & 9.21 & 3.646 & 0.008 & 2.98 & 0.44 & 1.69 & 0.18 + 62 & -6.80 & 6.86 & 14.604 & 0.022 & 16.766 & 0.058 & 7.46 & 3.668 & 0.006 & 3.03 & 0.11 & 2.19 & 0.05 + 63 & -7.32 & 7.78 & 13.190 & 0.005 & 15.195 & 0.008 & 8.64 & 3.653 & 0.006 & 2.78 & 0.02 & 2.61 & 0.02 + 64 & -7.45 & 8.29 & 15.413 & 0.040 & 17.374 & 0.060 & 6.44 & 3.680 & 0.005 & 2.75 & 0.13 & 1.79 & 0.06 + 65 & -7.64 & 8.56 & 15.467 & 0.040 & 17.477 & 0.060 & 6.86 & 3.675 & 0.006 & 2.82 & 0.13 & 1.78 & 0.06 + 66 & -7.48 & 8.99 & 12.976 & 0.005 & 14.980 & 0.008 & 12.14 & 3.603 & 0.009 & 2.70 & 0.03 & 2.53 & 0.02 + 67 & -8.23 & 8.88 & 15.498 & 0.040 & 17.511 & 0.060 & 5.75 & 3.687 & 0.008 & 2.83 & 0.13 & 1.81 & 0.06 + 68 & -8.91 & 8.64 & 15.444 & 0.040 & 17.651 & 0.060 & 9.59 & 3.641 & 0.008 & 3.06 & 0.13 & 1.79 & 0.06 + 69 & -8.59 & 8.18 & 12.292 & 0.004 & 14.300 & 0.005 & 8.80 & 3.651 & 0.005 & 2.78 & 0.01 & 2.97 & 0.02 + 70 & -8.13 & 8.13 & 14.233 & 0.010 & 16.282 & 0.047 & 8.98 & 3.649 & 0.009 & 2.84 & 0.09 & 2.21 & 0.04 + 71 & -8.18 & 8.32 & 15.497 & 0.040 & 17.501 & 0.060 & 7.83 & 3.664 & 0.007 & 2.79 & 0.13 & 1.72 & 0.06 + 72 & -7.94 & 8.45 & 15.375 & 0.040 & 17.420 & 0.060 & 9.34 & 3.644 & 0.007 & 2.83 & 0.13 & 1.73 & 0.06 + 73 & -7.75 & 8.26 & 15.616 & 0.040 & 17.814 & 0.245 & 6.29 & 3.682 & 0.006 & 3.10 & 0.44 & 1.85 & 0.18 + 74 & -7.97 & 7.51 & 12.569 & 0.004 & 14.867 & 0.008 & 10.02 & 3.635 & 0.009 & 3.19 & 0.02 & 2.97 & 0.02 + 75 & -7.61 & 7.21 & 14.774 & 0.026 & 16.954 & 0.058 & 5.67 & 3.688 & 0.007 & 3.08 & 0.11 & 2.20 & 0.05 + 76 & -8.45 & 6.99 & 10.843 & 0.002 & 13.278 & 0.002 & 12.81 & 3.593 & 0.013 & 3.32 & 0.03 & 3.60 & 0.03 + 77 & -9.21 & 6.53 & 12.543 & 0.004 & 14.852 & 0.008 & 10.86 & 3.623 & 0.008 & 3.18 & 0.02 & 2.95 & 0.02 + 78 & -8.64 & 7.34 & 15.402 & 0.040 & 17.464 & 0.060 & 8.56 & 3.654 & 0.007 & 2.87 & 0.13 & 1.76 & 0.06 + 79 & 2.94 & 12.93 & 15.314 & 0.049 & 16.938 & 0.055 & 5.66 & 3.688 & 0.004 & 2.26 & 0.13 & 1.65 & 0.06 + 80 & 2.67 & 12.74 & 14.953 & 0.027 & 16.828 & 0.055 & 7.95 & 3.662 & 0.005 & 2.60 & 0.11 & 1.86 & 0.05 + 81 & 2.54 & 12.45 & 15.140 & 0.027 & 16.947 & 0.055 & 8.00 & 3.661 & 0.006 & 2.50 & 0.11 & 1.74 & 0.05 + 82 & 2.59 & 12.04 & 15.189 & 0.027 & 16.632 & 0.046 & 4.90 & 3.696 & 0.005 & 2.00 & 0.09 & 1.62 & 0.04 + 83 & 3.21 & 12.69 & 16.003 & 0.075 & 17.874 & 0.210 & 7.56 & 3.667 & 0.007 & 2.60 & 0.40 & 1.45 & 0.16 + 84 & 3.00 & 12.64 & 15.868 & 0.075 & 17.752 & 0.210 & 6.33 & 3.681 & 0.006 & 2.64 & 0.40 & 1.56 & 0.16 + 85 & 5.62 & 11.88 & 15.501 & 0.049 & 17.546 & 0.080 & 9.55 & 3.641 & 0.006 & 2.82 & 0.17 & 1.67 & 0.07 + 86 & 5.83 & 11.42 & 11.834 & 0.003 & 14.160 & 0.003 & 13.30 & 3.585 & 0.007 & 3.14 & 0.02 & 3.11 & 0.02 + 87 & 5.94 & 11.12 & 13.811 & 0.011 & 16.328 & 0.046 & 10.99 & 3.621 & 0.008 & 3.49 & 0.09 & 2.56 & 0.04 + 88 & 5.48 & 11.45 & 13.479 & 0.008 & 16.289 & 0.046 & 11.75 & 3.609 & 0.007 & 3.90 & 0.08 & 2.83 & 0.04 + 89 & 5.18 & 11.53 & 15.624 & 0.049 & 17.880 & 0.210 & 6.90 & 3.675 & 0.005 & 3.18 & 0.38 & 1.86 & 0.16 + 90 & 4.83 & 11.74 & 15.531 & 0.049 & 17.641 & 0.080 & 7.38 & 3.669 & 0.005 & 2.96 & 0.17 & 1.79 & 0.07 + 91 & 4.78 & 11.53 & 15.510 & 0.049 & 17.643 & 0.080 & 4.91 & 3.696 & 0.006 & 3.02 & 0.17 & 1.90 & 0.07 + 92 & 4.35 & 11.69 & 14.863 & 0.027 & 16.784 & 0.055 & 8.03 & 3.661 & 0.005 & 2.67 & 0.11 & 1.92 & 0.05 + 93 & 3.70 & 11.42 & 12.593 & 0.003 & 14.495 & 0.006 & 5.95 & 3.685 & 0.003 & 2.67 & 0.01 & 2.90 & 0.01 + 94 & 3.43 & 11.39 & 13.861 & 0.011 & 15.757 & 0.042 & 8.13 & 3.660 & 0.005 & 2.63 & 0.08 & 2.30 & 0.03 + 95 & 2.38 & 10.96 & 12.391 & 0.003 & 14.350 & 0.006 & 11.31 & 3.616 & 0.004 & 2.66 & 0.01 & 2.78 & 0.01 + 96 & 2.59 & 10.77 & 13.164 & 0.005 & 14.799 & 0.006 & 6.53 & 3.679 & 0.004 & 2.26 & 0.01 & 2.49 & 0.01 + 97 & 3.16 & 10.69 & 14.694 & 0.019 & 16.701 & 0.046 & 5.54 & 3.690 & 0.006 & 2.83 & 0.09 & 2.13 & 0.04 + 98 & 3.73 & 10.53 & 12.842 & 0.005 & 14.355 & 0.006 & 8.50 & 3.655 & 0.005 & 2.06 & 0.01 & 2.47 & 0.01 + 99 & 4.51 & 10.85 & 11.905 & 0.003 & 13.794 & 0.003 & 5.57 & 3.689 & 0.003 & 2.65 & 0.01 & 3.18 & 0.01 + 100 & 5.10 & 10.66 & 13.593 & 0.008 & 15.708 & 0.008 & 9.17 & 3.646 & 0.007 & 2.93 & 0.02 & 2.49 & 0.02 + 101 & 5.67 & 10.80 & 15.151 & 0.027 & 17.216 & 0.055 & 8.89 & 3.650 & 0.005 & 2.86 & 0.11 & 1.85 & 0.05 + 102 & 5.40 & 9.96 & 15.114 & 0.027 & 17.121 & 0.055 & 6.77 & 3.676 & 0.006 & 2.81 & 0.11 & 1.92 & 0.05 + 103 & 5.16 & 9.88 & 15.134 & 0.027 & 17.133 & 0.055 & 8.75 & 3.652 & 0.007 & 2.77 & 0.11 & 1.83 & 0.05 + 104 & 5.91 & 9.45 & 15.730 & 0.049 & 17.717 & 0.080 & 6.20 & 3.682 & 0.009 & 2.79 & 0.17 & 1.68 & 0.07 + 105 & 5.08 & 10.18 & 13.307 & 0.008 & 15.413 & 0.008 & 11.02 & 3.620 & 0.007 & 2.88 & 0.02 & 2.51 & 0.02 + 106 & 3.59 & 9.45 & 13.281 & 0.008 & 15.303 & 0.008 & 11.49 & 3.613 & 0.006 & 2.74 & 0.02 & 2.45 & 0.02 + 107 & 3.29 & 9.40 & 15.212 & 0.027 & 17.153 & 0.055 & 7.64 & 3.666 & 0.009 & 2.70 & 0.11 & 1.81 & 0.05 + 108 & 3.13 & 9.53 & 15.129 & 0.027 & 16.961 & 0.055 & 6.68 & 3.677 & 0.005 & 2.55 & 0.11 & 1.81 & 0.05 + 109 & 3.08 & 9.83 & 13.819 & 0.011 & 15.715 & 0.008 & 9.31 & 3.644 & 0.006 & 2.61 & 0.03 & 2.27 & 0.02 + 110 & 3.46 & 10.12 & 13.302 & 0.008 & 15.255 & 0.008 & 14.05 & 3.572 & 0.007 & 2.56 & 0.03 & 2.27 & 0.02 + 111 & 2.94 & 10.07 & 14.905 & 0.027 & 16.849 & 0.055 & 8.69 & 3.653 & 0.005 & 2.69 & 0.11 & 1.89 & 0.05 + 112 & 2.51 & 10.23 & 14.381 & 0.019 & 15.823 & 0.042 & 5.62 & 3.689 & 0.005 & 1.99 & 0.08 & 1.92 & 0.04 + 113 & 2.67 & 9.53 & 15.518 & 0.049 & 17.613 & 0.080 & 7.98 & 3.662 & 0.007 & 2.92 & 0.17 & 1.76 & 0.07 + 114 & -4.86 & 12.72 & 15.647 & 0.042 & 17.899 & 0.224 & 7.68 & 3.665 & 0.007 & 3.16 & 0.41 & 1.82 & 0.16 + 115 & -5.40 & 12.39 & 14.498 & 0.019 & 16.366 & 0.048 & 7.14 & 3.672 & 0.005 & 2.60 & 0.09 & 2.07 & 0.04 + 116 & -6.18 & 12.69 & 15.679 & 0.042 & 17.406 & 0.072 & 6.76 & 3.676 & 0.005 & 2.40 & 0.15 & 1.53 & 0.06 + 117 & -6.59 & 12.77 & 16.205 & 0.068 & 18.072 & 0.224 & 5.31 & 3.692 & 0.005 & 2.62 & 0.42 & 1.45 & 0.17 + 118 & -6.78 & 12.66 & 16.404 & 0.119 & 18.180 & 0.224 & 6.30 & 3.681 & 0.008 & 2.48 & 0.45 & 1.28 & 0.19 + 119 & -7.48 & 12.26 & 15.019 & 0.033 & 16.737 & 0.048 & 7.69 & 3.665 & 0.005 & 2.37 & 0.10 & 1.75 & 0.05 + 120 & -7.70 & 12.45 & 15.224 & 0.033 & 16.988 & 0.053 & 6.94 & 3.674 & 0.005 & 2.45 & 0.11 & 1.73 & 0.05 + 121 & -7.07 & 11.93 & 15.166 & 0.033 & 16.674 & 0.048 & 5.40 & 3.691 & 0.004 & 2.09 & 0.10 & 1.65 & 0.04 + 122 & -6.86 & 11.85 & 15.556 & 0.042 & 17.281 & 0.072 & 6.11 & 3.683 & 0.004 & 2.40 & 0.15 & 1.60 & 0.06 + 123 & -6.56 & 11.99 & 15.669 & 0.042 & 17.310 & 0.072 & 5.47 & 3.690 & 0.004 & 2.29 & 0.15 & 1.53 & 0.06 + 124 & -6.21 & 12.10 & 15.638 & 0.042 & 17.358 & 0.072 & 6.14 & 3.683 & 0.006 & 2.40 & 0.15 & 1.56 & 0.06 + 125 & -5.16 & 12.20 & 17.135 & 0.131 & 19.005 & 0.252 & 6.87 & 3.675 & 0.005 & 2.61 & 0.51 & 1.03 & 0.21 + 126 & -4.89 & 12.12 & 15.325 & 0.042 & 17.257 & 0.072 & 5.98 & 3.685 & 0.005 & 2.71 & 0.15 & 1.82 & 0.06 + 127 & -5.18 & 11.85 & 15.313 & 0.042 & 17.172 & 0.053 & 5.02 & 3.695 & 0.004 & 2.62 & 0.12 & 1.82 & 0.05 + 128 & -5.83 & 11.56 & 14.756 & 0.033 & 16.508 & 0.048 & 7.64 & 3.666 & 0.004 & 2.42 & 0.10 & 1.88 & 0.05 + 129 & -6.56 & 11.45 & 14.853 & 0.033 & 16.636 & 0.048 & 8.90 & 3.650 & 0.005 & 2.45 & 0.10 & 1.80 & 0.05 + 130 & -7.21 & 11.53 & 13.517 & 0.008 & 15.305 & 0.010 & 9.99 & 3.635 & 0.005 & 2.43 & 0.02 & 2.29 & 0.02 + 131 & -7.51 & 11.74 & 14.319 & 0.019 & 16.096 & 0.045 & 7.41 & 3.669 & 0.004 & 2.46 & 0.09 & 2.08 & 0.04 + 132 & -7.75 & 11.58 & 15.081 & 0.033 & 16.952 & 0.053 & 8.21 & 3.659 & 0.007 & 2.59 & 0.11 & 1.80 & 0.05 + 133 & -8.23 & 11.45 & 15.838 & 0.068 & 17.605 & 0.072 & 7.01 & 3.673 & 0.004 & 2.46 & 0.18 & 1.48 & 0.08 + 134 & -8.29 & 11.12 & 15.889 & 0.068 & 17.677 & 0.072 & 6.84 & 3.675 & 0.004 & 2.49 & 0.18 & 1.48 & 0.08 + 135 & -7.80 & 11.18 & 14.080 & 0.011 & 15.992 & 0.045 & 10.11 & 3.634 & 0.005 & 2.62 & 0.08 & 2.14 & 0.04 + 136 & -7.70 & 10.83 & 15.377 & 0.042 & 17.235 & 0.053 & 6.32 & 3.681 & 0.005 & 2.60 & 0.12 & 1.74 & 0.05 + 137 & -7.32 & 11.29 & 14.858 & 0.033 & 16.667 & 0.048 & 7.69 & 3.665 & 0.004 & 2.51 & 0.10 & 1.87 & 0.05 + 138 & -7.07 & 10.85 & 15.836 & 0.068 & 17.186 & 0.053 & 5.97 & 3.685 & 0.006 & 1.85 & 0.15 & 1.27 & 0.07 + 139 & -6.83 & 10.88 & 14.494 & 0.019 & 16.366 & 0.048 & 10.31 & 3.631 & 0.006 & 2.55 & 0.09 & 1.94 & 0.04 + 140 & -7.02 & 10.53 & 14.002 & 0.011 & 16.085 & 0.045 & 9.61 & 3.641 & 0.005 & 2.88 & 0.08 & 2.29 & 0.04 + 141 & -7.26 & 10.50 & 14.588 & 0.019 & 16.339 & 0.048 & 7.36 & 3.669 & 0.005 & 2.43 & 0.09 & 1.96 & 0.04 + 142 & -5.99 & 11.18 & 11.861 & 0.003 & 13.400 & 0.002 & 10.47 & 3.628 & 0.005 & 2.06 & 0.01 & 2.79 & 0.01 + 143 & -5.89 & 10.66 & 13.946 & 0.011 & 15.939 & 0.045 & 8.36 & 3.657 & 0.005 & 2.77 & 0.08 & 2.31 & 0.04 + 144 & -5.45 & 10.31 & 15.461 & 0.042 & 17.386 & 0.072 & 5.11 & 3.694 & 0.004 & 2.71 & 0.15 & 1.79 & 0.06 + 145 & -5.26 & 10.18 & 14.684 & 0.019 & 16.372 & 0.048 & 7.67 & 3.666 & 0.004 & 2.33 & 0.09 & 1.87 & 0.04 + 146 & -4.86 & 9.85 & 12.872 & 0.004 & 14.806 & 0.007 & 10.37 & 3.630 & 0.005 & 2.64 & 0.02 & 2.62 & 0.01 + 147 & 4.94 & 16.85 & 15.552 & 0.033 & 17.771 & 0.193 & 8.39 & 3.657 & 0.007 & 3.10 & 0.35 & 1.80 & 0.14 + 148 & 4.18 & 16.82 & 14.313 & 0.014 & 16.510 & 0.043 & 9.01 & 3.649 & 0.006 & 3.06 & 0.08 & 2.26 & 0.04 + 149 & 3.51 & 16.69 & 15.608 & 0.033 & 17.420 & 0.058 & 7.22 & 3.671 & 0.005 & 2.52 & 0.12 & 1.59 & 0.05 + 150 & 5.94 & 16.58 & 15.878 & 0.073 & 18.001 & 0.193 & 5.31 & 3.692 & 0.005 & 3.00 & 0.37 & 1.74 & 0.15 + 151 & 5.83 & 16.28 & 15.617 & 0.033 & 17.657 & 0.058 & 7.14 & 3.672 & 0.006 & 2.86 & 0.12 & 1.72 & 0.05 + 152 & 5.59 & 16.09 & 15.837 & 0.073 & 17.933 & 0.193 & 6.11 & 3.683 & 0.005 & 2.95 & 0.37 & 1.71 & 0.15 + 153 & 4.97 & 16.42 & 12.691 & 0.003 & 15.117 & 0.005 & 14.50 & 3.564 & 0.006 & 3.24 & 0.02 & 2.76 & 0.02 + 154 & 4.32 & 16.28 & 16.030 & 0.073 & 18.088 & 0.193 & 6.94 & 3.674 & 0.008 & 2.89 & 0.37 & 1.58 & 0.15 + 155 & 2.73 & 16.60 & 15.914 & 0.073 & 17.716 & 0.058 & 5.83 & 3.686 & 0.008 & 2.52 & 0.17 & 1.51 & 0.08 + 156 & 2.84 & 16.25 & 13.465 & 0.007 & 15.255 & 0.007 & 8.70 & 3.653 & 0.006 & 2.46 & 0.02 & 2.37 & 0.02 + 157 & 3.00 & 15.98 & 15.508 & 0.033 & 17.399 & 0.058 & 4.92 & 3.696 & 0.006 & 2.66 & 0.12 & 1.76 & 0.05 + 158 & 3.35 & 15.90 & 15.638 & 0.033 & 17.629 & 0.058 & 7.04 & 3.673 & 0.005 & 2.79 & 0.12 & 1.69 & 0.05 + 159 & 3.73 & 15.96 & 15.501 & 0.033 & 17.434 & 0.058 & 6.61 & 3.678 & 0.006 & 2.71 & 0.12 & 1.73 & 0.05 + 160 & 4.67 & 15.93 & 15.194 & 0.026 & 17.162 & 0.046 & 6.63 & 3.678 & 0.004 & 2.76 & 0.09 & 1.87 & 0.04 + 161 & 5.32 & 15.77 & 15.439 & 0.033 & 17.512 & 0.058 & 7.90 & 3.663 & 0.005 & 2.89 & 0.12 & 1.78 & 0.05 + 162 & 5.43 & 15.88 & 15.235 & 0.026 & 17.402 & 0.058 & 9.64 & 3.640 & 0.005 & 3.00 & 0.11 & 1.85 & 0.05 + 163 & 5.78 & 15.80 & 15.236 & 0.026 & 17.399 & 0.058 & 8.57 & 3.654 & 0.007 & 3.01 & 0.11 & 1.89 & 0.05 + 164 & 5.83 & 15.52 & 15.698 & 0.033 & 18.004 & 0.193 & 8.79 & 3.651 & 0.006 & 3.22 & 0.35 & 1.78 & 0.14 + 165 & 5.99 & 15.58 & 16.165 & 0.073 & 18.239 & 0.193 & 6.62 & 3.678 & 0.008 & 2.91 & 0.37 & 1.54 & 0.15 + 166 & 5.08 & 15.50 & 16.363 & 0.076 & 18.561 & 0.216 & 8.51 & 3.655 & 0.006 & 3.07 & 0.41 & 1.46 & 0.17 + 167 & 4.99 & 15.15 & 15.308 & 0.033 & 17.408 & 0.058 & 10.85 & 3.623 & 0.007 & 2.88 & 0.12 & 1.72 & 0.05 + 168 & 3.81 & 15.31 & 12.615 & 0.003 & 14.638 & 0.005 & 13.49 & 3.581 & 0.007 & 2.68 & 0.02 & 2.61 & 0.02 + 169 & 3.38 & 15.31 & 15.383 & 0.033 & 17.319 & 0.058 & 8.35 & 3.657 & 0.006 & 2.68 & 0.12 & 1.71 & 0.05 + 170 & 3.16 & 15.15 & 14.040 & 0.008 & 16.061 & 0.043 & 9.34 & 3.644 & 0.006 & 2.79 & 0.08 & 2.25 & 0.04 + 171 & 2.92 & 15.66 & 15.052 & 0.026 & 16.976 & 0.046 & 8.92 & 3.650 & 0.008 & 2.66 & 0.09 & 1.81 & 0.05 + 172 & 2.78 & 15.34 & 14.778 & 0.026 & 16.934 & 0.046 & 9.07 & 3.648 & 0.005 & 3.00 & 0.09 & 2.05 & 0.04 + 173 & 2.54 & 14.80 & 13.166 & 0.004 & 14.934 & 0.005 & 5.00 & 3.695 & 0.005 & 2.48 & 0.01 & 2.62 & 0.01 + 174 & 3.21 & 14.42 & 15.317 & 0.033 & 17.176 & 0.046 & 6.99 & 3.674 & 0.006 & 2.59 & 0.10 & 1.74 & 0.05 + 175 & 3.24 & 14.66 & 15.590 & 0.033 & 17.545 & 0.058 & 7.46 & 3.668 & 0.006 & 2.73 & 0.12 & 1.67 & 0.05 + 176 & 3.62 & 14.80 & 15.449 & 0.033 & 17.362 & 0.058 & 9.52 & 3.642 & 0.005 & 2.63 & 0.12 & 1.61 & 0.05 + 177 & 4.10 & 14.88 & 15.905 & 0.073 & 18.090 & 0.193 & 7.66 & 3.666 & 0.005 & 3.06 & 0.37 & 1.67 & 0.15 + 178 & 6.10 & 15.07 & 15.197 & 0.026 & 17.898 & 0.193 & 10.05 & 3.634 & 0.006 & 3.78 & 0.35 & 2.16 & 0.14 + 179 & 5.75 & 14.50 & 10.803 & 0.002 & 13.327 & 0.002 & 16.04 & 3.536 & 0.007 & 3.31 & 0.02 & 3.49 & 0.02 + 180 & 4.56 & 14.23 & 12.404 & 0.003 & 15.485 & 0.007 & 14.27 & 3.568 & 0.007 & 4.22 & 0.02 & 3.28 & 0.02 + 181 & 4.00 & 14.28 & 15.637 & 0.033 & 17.484 & 0.058 & 4.80 & 3.697 & 0.003 & 2.60 & 0.12 & 1.69 & 0.05 + 182 & 3.89 & 13.77 & 12.332 & 0.003 & 14.286 & 0.005 & 12.22 & 3.602 & 0.007 & 2.62 & 0.02 & 2.75 & 0.02 + 183 & 3.67 & 14.09 & 15.154 & 0.026 & 17.022 & 0.046 & 9.60 & 3.641 & 0.005 & 2.56 & 0.09 & 1.70 & 0.04 + 184 & 3.21 & 13.47 & 13.180 & 0.004 & 15.232 & 0.005 & 11.63 & 3.611 & 0.007 & 2.78 & 0.02 & 2.50 & 0.02 + 185 & 3.00 & 14.09 & 15.071 & 0.026 & 17.010 & 0.046 & 7.33 & 3.670 & 0.005 & 2.70 & 0.09 & 1.88 & 0.04 + 186 & 2.46 & 13.45 & 15.667 & 0.033 & 17.564 & 0.058 & 7.33 & 3.670 & 0.005 & 2.64 & 0.12 & 1.61 & 0.05 + 187 & 4.75 & 13.82 & 15.838 & 0.073 & 17.896 & 0.193 & 7.32 & 3.670 & 0.004 & 2.88 & 0.37 & 1.64 & 0.15 + 188 & 5.35 & 13.53 & 15.493 & 0.033 & 18.000 & 0.193 & 9.48 & 3.642 & 0.009 & 3.51 & 0.35 & 1.95 & 0.14 + 189 & 5.21 & 13.01 & 13.400 & 0.007 & 15.575 & 0.007 & 11.59 & 3.612 & 0.006 & 2.97 & 0.02 & 2.49 & 0.02 + 190 & 4.86 & 13.04 & 15.419 & 0.033 & 17.675 & 0.058 & 4.92 & 3.696 & 0.005 & 3.20 & 0.12 & 2.01 & 0.05 + 191 & 4.62 & 13.28 & 15.571 & 0.033 & 17.613 & 0.058 & 7.31 & 3.670 & 0.005 & 2.86 & 0.12 & 1.74 & 0.05 + 192 & 4.29 & 13.42 & 15.229 & 0.026 & 17.173 & 0.046 & 7.96 & 3.662 & 0.007 & 2.70 & 0.09 & 1.79 & 0.04 + 193 & 4.13 & 13.18 & 15.177 & 0.026 & 17.135 & 0.046 & 5.54 & 3.690 & 0.006 & 2.76 & 0.09 & 1.91 & 0.04 + 194 & 3.81 & 12.96 & 14.855 & 0.026 & 17.095 & 0.046 & 7.21 & 3.671 & 0.005 & 3.15 & 0.09 & 2.14 & 0.04 + 195 & 3.75 & 12.82 & 14.958 & 0.026 & 16.816 & 0.046 & 6.62 & 3.678 & 0.006 & 2.59 & 0.09 & 1.90 & 0.04 + 196 & 3.46 & 12.18 & 14.986 & 0.026 & 16.925 & 0.046 & 7.58 & 3.667 & 0.007 & 2.70 & 0.09 & 1.90 & 0.04 + 197 & 4.62 & 12.31 & 14.028 & 0.008 & 16.714 & 0.043 & 11.82 & 3.608 & 0.007 & 3.72 & 0.08 & 2.53 & 0.04 + 198 & 4.67 & 11.96 & 15.444 & 0.033 & 17.517 & 0.058 & 8.54 & 3.655 & 0.011 & 2.88 & 0.12 & 1.76 & 0.06 + 199 & 5.48 & 12.34 & 14.066 & 0.008 & 16.048 & 0.043 & 9.55 & 3.641 & 0.009 & 2.73 & 0.08 & 2.21 & 0.04 + 200 & 5.75 & 11.96 & 15.084 & 0.026 & 18.396 & 0.216 & 10.30 & 3.631 & 0.010 & 4.68 & 0.39 & 2.55 & 0.16 + 201 & 5.83 & 12.50 & 15.007 & 0.026 & 16.824 & 0.046 & 7.83 & 3.664 & 0.007 & 2.52 & 0.09 & 1.81 & 0.04 + 202 & 5.56 & 12.80 & 15.206 & 0.026 & 17.276 & 0.058 & 7.35 & 3.669 & 0.009 & 2.90 & 0.11 & 1.90 & 0.05 + 203 & 5.32 & 12.64 & 15.004 & 0.026 & 16.793 & 0.046 & 7.93 & 3.662 & 0.006 & 2.47 & 0.09 & 1.79 & 0.04 + 204 & 17.98 & 18.79 & 13.875 & 0.008 & 15.987 & 0.041 & 12.13 & 3.603 & 0.006 & 2.86 & 0.08 & 2.23 & 0.03 + 205 & 17.42 & 18.66 & 12.761 & 0.005 & 14.750 & 0.005 & 7.67 & 3.665 & 0.004 & 2.77 & 0.01 & 2.82 & 0.01 + 206 & 16.96 & 18.36 & 15.226 & 0.021 & 17.257 & 0.058 & 8.52 & 3.655 & 0.005 & 2.82 & 0.11 & 1.82 & 0.05 + 207 & 16.63 & 18.68 & 14.970 & 0.021 & 16.876 & 0.048 & 8.24 & 3.658 & 0.005 & 2.64 & 0.09 & 1.86 & 0.04 + 208 & 16.42 & 18.63 & 15.582 & 0.027 & 17.474 & 0.058 & 6.17 & 3.683 & 0.004 & 2.65 & 0.11 & 1.69 & 0.05 + 209 & 16.42 & 18.39 & 15.578 & 0.027 & 17.470 & 0.058 & 8.39 & 3.657 & 0.007 & 2.62 & 0.11 & 1.60 & 0.05 + 210 & 15.55 & 18.36 & 15.736 & 0.027 & 17.868 & 0.202 & 6.30 & 3.681 & 0.006 & 3.00 & 0.36 & 1.76 & 0.15 + 211 & 15.47 & 18.68 & 16.367 & 0.083 & 18.105 & 0.202 & 5.70 & 3.688 & 0.004 & 2.43 & 0.39 & 1.30 & 0.16 + 212 & 15.39 & 19.06 & 16.023 & 0.061 & 17.959 & 0.202 & 3.62 & 3.708 & 0.004 & 2.74 & 0.38 & 1.62 & 0.15 + 213 & 15.15 & 18.58 & 14.538 & 0.015 & 16.357 & 0.047 & 7.22 & 3.671 & 0.004 & 2.53 & 0.09 & 2.02 & 0.04 + 214 & 14.61 & 18.50 & 15.400 & 0.027 & 17.426 & 0.058 & 7.51 & 3.667 & 0.008 & 2.83 & 0.11 & 1.79 & 0.05 + 215 & 14.61 & 18.04 & 12.841 & 0.005 & 14.809 & 0.006 & 5.63 & 3.689 & 0.003 & 2.77 & 0.01 & 2.85 & 0.01 + 216 & 15.07 & 18.09 & 15.299 & 0.027 & 17.248 & 0.048 & 6.82 & 3.675 & 0.006 & 2.73 & 0.10 & 1.81 & 0.04 + 217 & 15.61 & 17.90 & 15.055 & 0.021 & 16.851 & 0.048 & 4.29 & 3.702 & 0.003 & 2.53 & 0.09 & 1.90 & 0.04 + 218 & 15.82 & 17.93 & 15.329 & 0.027 & 17.293 & 0.058 & 5.46 & 3.690 & 0.004 & 2.76 & 0.11 & 1.86 & 0.05 + 219 & 16.09 & 18.01 & 15.249 & 0.021 & 17.087 & 0.048 & 7.03 & 3.673 & 0.004 & 2.56 & 0.09 & 1.76 & 0.04 + 220 & 16.36 & 17.82 & 16.300 & 0.083 & 18.281 & 0.204 & 8.44 & 3.656 & 0.006 & 2.75 & 0.39 & 1.36 & 0.16 + 221 & 16.96 & 17.98 & 13.942 & 0.008 & 15.841 & 0.041 & 9.37 & 3.644 & 0.004 & 2.61 & 0.07 & 2.22 & 0.03 + 222 & 17.60 & 18.09 & 15.513 & 0.027 & 17.565 & 0.058 & 9.45 & 3.643 & 0.006 & 2.83 & 0.11 & 1.67 & 0.05 + 223 & 17.12 & 17.74 & 14.996 & 0.021 & 16.761 & 0.048 & 8.00 & 3.661 & 0.004 & 2.44 & 0.09 & 1.78 & 0.04 + 224 & 16.98 & 17.58 & 13.668 & 0.005 & 15.518 & 0.007 & 9.04 & 3.648 & 0.004 & 2.54 & 0.02 & 2.31 & 0.01 + 225 & 16.52 & 17.55 & 15.812 & 0.061 & 18.124 & 0.202 & 5.87 & 3.686 & 0.004 & 3.28 & 0.38 & 1.85 & 0.15 + 226 & 16.31 & 17.28 & 14.495 & 0.015 & 16.480 & 0.047 & 9.03 & 3.648 & 0.004 & 2.74 & 0.09 & 2.06 & 0.04 + 227 & 15.74 & 17.39 & 15.275 & 0.027 & 17.219 & 0.048 & 6.77 & 3.676 & 0.006 & 2.72 & 0.10 & 1.82 & 0.04 + 228 & 15.34 & 17.39 & 15.470 & 0.027 & 17.529 & 0.058 & 6.90 & 3.675 & 0.005 & 2.89 & 0.11 & 1.80 & 0.05 + 229 & 15.42 & 16.98 & 16.262 & 0.083 & 18.066 & 0.202 & 6.45 & 3.680 & 0.007 & 2.52 & 0.39 & 1.35 & 0.16 + 230 & 15.34 & 16.71 & 15.123 & 0.021 & 17.461 & 0.058 & 6.69 & 3.677 & 0.005 & 3.30 & 0.11 & 2.12 & 0.05 + 231 & 15.93 & 16.71 & 13.527 & 0.005 & 15.422 & 0.007 & 10.90 & 3.622 & 0.006 & 2.57 & 0.02 & 2.31 & 0.02 + 232 & 16.44 & 17.15 & 13.639 & 0.005 & 15.636 & 0.007 & 10.57 & 3.627 & 0.005 & 2.73 & 0.02 & 2.34 & 0.02 + 233 & 16.98 & 17.17 & 14.927 & 0.021 & 16.440 & 0.047 & 7.26 & 3.670 & 0.004 & 2.07 & 0.09 & 1.68 & 0.04 + 234 & 17.25 & 17.04 & 15.273 & 0.027 & 17.212 & 0.048 & 8.20 & 3.659 & 0.006 & 2.69 & 0.10 & 1.76 & 0.04 + 235 & 17.39 & 17.20 & 14.481 & 0.015 & 16.331 & 0.047 & 8.79 & 3.651 & 0.005 & 2.55 & 0.09 & 2.00 & 0.04 + 236 & 17.77 & 16.69 & 14.440 & 0.015 & 16.309 & 0.047 & 7.90 & 3.663 & 0.007 & 2.59 & 0.09 & 2.06 & 0.04 + 237 & 17.31 & 16.69 & 15.226 & 0.021 & 16.971 & 0.048 & 4.79 & 3.697 & 0.004 & 2.45 & 0.09 & 1.79 & 0.04 + 238 & 16.98 & 16.77 & 16.383 & 0.083 & 18.381 & 0.204 & 6.51 & 3.679 & 0.008 & 2.80 & 0.39 & 1.42 & 0.16 + 239 & 17.52 & 16.07 & 15.026 & 0.021 & 16.916 & 0.048 & 10.57 & 3.627 & 0.009 & 2.57 & 0.09 & 1.72 & 0.05 + 240 & 17.31 & 15.71 & 13.073 & 0.005 & 15.095 & 0.006 & 10.61 & 3.626 & 0.005 & 2.77 & 0.02 & 2.58 & 0.02 + 241 & 16.39 & 15.63 & 15.333 & 0.027 & 17.192 & 0.048 & 6.66 & 3.677 & 0.005 & 2.59 & 0.10 & 1.75 & 0.04 + 242 & 16.12 & 15.42 & 14.285 & 0.015 & 16.163 & 0.041 & 8.51 & 3.655 & 0.008 & 2.59 & 0.08 & 2.10 & 0.04 + 243 & 16.04 & 15.77 & 15.011 & 0.021 & 16.470 & 0.047 & 4.92 & 3.696 & 0.004 & 2.02 & 0.09 & 1.70 & 0.04 + 244 & 15.28 & 15.47 & 15.066 & 0.021 & 16.950 & 0.048 & 6.97 & 3.674 & 0.005 & 2.63 & 0.09 & 1.86 & 0.04 + 245 & 15.31 & 16.09 & 15.352 & 0.027 & 17.243 & 0.048 & 6.55 & 3.679 & 0.007 & 2.64 & 0.10 & 1.76 & 0.05 + 246 & 15.50 & 16.42 & 15.382 & 0.027 & 17.339 & 0.058 & 7.03 & 3.673 & 0.004 & 2.73 & 0.11 & 1.77 & 0.05 + 247 & 15.12 & 16.36 & 14.726 & 0.015 & 16.606 & 0.047 & 10.30 & 3.631 & 0.006 & 2.56 & 0.09 & 1.85 & 0.04 + 248 & 18.71 & 13.90 & 14.621 & 0.016 & 17.520 & 0.065 & 11.38 & 3.615 & 0.005 & 4.04 & 0.12 & 2.44 & 0.05 + 249 & 18.58 & 13.80 & 13.958 & 0.009 & 15.403 & 0.009 & 6.33 & 3.681 & 0.004 & 1.99 & 0.02 & 2.07 & 0.02 + 250 & 17.87 & 13.93 & 14.910 & 0.027 & 16.616 & 0.044 & 4.50 & 3.700 & 0.004 & 2.39 & 0.09 & 1.90 & 0.04 + 251 & 16.98 & 13.61 & 14.856 & 0.027 & 17.116 & 0.055 & 8.54 & 3.655 & 0.004 & 3.16 & 0.11 & 2.10 & 0.05 + 252 & 16.17 & 13.66 & 16.296 & 0.100 & 18.025 & 0.198 & 5.75 & 3.687 & 0.006 & 2.41 & 0.39 & 1.32 & 0.16 + 253 & 15.93 & 13.45 & 15.774 & 0.064 & 17.581 & 0.065 & 5.53 & 3.690 & 0.007 & 2.53 & 0.16 & 1.58 & 0.07 + 254 & 16.33 & 13.23 & 14.934 & 0.027 & 16.765 & 0.055 & 6.30 & 3.681 & 0.004 & 2.56 & 0.11 & 1.90 & 0.05 + 255 & 16.60 & 13.45 & 16.083 & 0.064 & 18.269 & 0.233 & 4.92 & 3.696 & 0.003 & 3.10 & 0.43 & 1.70 & 0.17 + 256 & 16.90 & 13.45 & 15.023 & 0.027 & 16.766 & 0.055 & 6.39 & 3.680 & 0.004 & 2.43 & 0.11 & 1.81 & 0.05 + 257 & 17.09 & 13.18 & 15.868 & 0.064 & 17.650 & 0.065 & 5.28 & 3.692 & 0.006 & 2.50 & 0.16 & 1.54 & 0.07 + 258 & 17.28 & 13.18 & 14.923 & 0.027 & 16.713 & 0.044 & 6.56 & 3.678 & 0.004 & 2.49 & 0.09 & 1.88 & 0.04 + 259 & 17.55 & 13.31 & 15.131 & 0.027 & 16.904 & 0.055 & 7.08 & 3.672 & 0.005 & 2.46 & 0.11 & 1.76 & 0.05 + 260 & 18.14 & 13.58 & 15.066 & 0.027 & 16.834 & 0.055 & 7.71 & 3.665 & 0.004 & 2.45 & 0.11 & 1.76 & 0.05 + 261 & 18.31 & 13.50 & 15.182 & 0.027 & 16.984 & 0.055 & 7.14 & 3.672 & 0.004 & 2.50 & 0.11 & 1.76 & 0.05 + 262 & 18.90 & 13.20 & 11.054 & 0.002 & 12.618 & 0.002 & 11.69 & 3.610 & 0.005 & 2.06 & 0.01 & 3.06 & 0.01 + 263 & 18.50 & 12.58 & 14.975 & 0.027 & 16.649 & 0.044 & 7.40 & 3.669 & 0.005 & 2.31 & 0.09 & 1.75 & 0.04 + 264 & 18.31 & 12.28 & 12.522 & 0.003 & 14.414 & 0.005 & 10.74 & 3.624 & 0.004 & 2.57 & 0.01 & 2.72 & 0.01 + 265 & 18.71 & 12.26 & 15.774 & 0.064 & 17.527 & 0.065 & 5.80 & 3.687 & 0.005 & 2.45 & 0.16 & 1.54 & 0.07 + 266 & 19.17 & 12.18 & 12.940 & 0.005 & 14.683 & 0.005 & 11.04 & 3.620 & 0.007 & 2.34 & 0.02 & 2.45 & 0.02 + 267 & 17.87 & 12.64 & 15.189 & 0.027 & 17.110 & 0.055 & 7.94 & 3.662 & 0.005 & 2.67 & 0.11 & 1.79 & 0.05 + 268 & 17.74 & 12.26 & 13.417 & 0.008 & 15.210 & 0.006 & 9.23 & 3.646 & 0.004 & 2.46 & 0.02 & 2.37 & 0.01 + 269 & 17.15 & 12.18 & 16.087 & 0.064 & 18.519 & 0.233 & 6.83 & 3.675 & 0.006 & 3.44 & 0.43 & 1.78 & 0.17 + 270 & 16.98 & 12.31 & 15.043 & 0.027 & 16.845 & 0.055 & 8.59 & 3.654 & 0.003 & 2.48 & 0.11 & 1.75 & 0.05 + 271 & 16.69 & 12.18 & 12.248 & 0.003 & 14.120 & 0.003 & 12.93 & 3.591 & 0.006 & 2.48 & 0.02 & 2.70 & 0.02 + 272 & 16.77 & 12.99 & 14.951 & 0.027 & 16.704 & 0.044 & 6.96 & 3.674 & 0.003 & 2.43 & 0.09 & 1.83 & 0.04 + 273 & 16.39 & 12.61 & 12.552 & 0.003 & 14.315 & 0.005 & 4.08 & 3.704 & 0.002 & 2.48 & 0.01 & 2.89 & 0.01 + 274 & 15.55 & 13.10 & 15.324 & 0.039 & 17.308 & 0.065 & 4.81 & 3.697 & 0.003 & 2.80 & 0.13 & 1.89 & 0.06 + 275 & 15.42 & 12.50 & 14.718 & 0.016 & 16.613 & 0.044 & 6.34 & 3.681 & 0.003 & 2.65 & 0.08 & 2.03 & 0.03 + 276 & 15.96 & 12.23 & 13.624 & 0.008 & 15.550 & 0.009 & 8.26 & 3.658 & 0.004 & 2.67 & 0.02 & 2.41 & 0.01 + 277 & 15.47 & 11.77 & 15.327 & 0.039 & 17.333 & 0.065 & 4.94 & 3.696 & 0.005 & 2.83 & 0.13 & 1.90 & 0.06 + 278 & 15.50 & 11.56 & 15.479 & 0.039 & 17.545 & 0.065 & 6.01 & 3.684 & 0.008 & 2.91 & 0.14 & 1.84 & 0.06 + 279 & 15.85 & 11.34 & 13.934 & 0.009 & 15.885 & 0.045 & 7.63 & 3.666 & 0.006 & 2.72 & 0.08 & 2.32 & 0.04 + 280 & 16.01 & 11.15 & 15.087 & 0.027 & 17.174 & 0.055 & 9.49 & 3.642 & 0.008 & 2.89 & 0.11 & 1.86 & 0.05 + 281 & 15.82 & 11.10 & 15.398 & 0.039 & 17.480 & 0.065 & 6.14 & 3.683 & 0.005 & 2.93 & 0.13 & 1.87 & 0.06 + 282 & 16.50 & 11.58 & 15.047 & 0.027 & 16.877 & 0.055 & 8.00 & 3.661 & 0.010 & 2.53 & 0.11 & 1.79 & 0.05 + 283 & 16.74 & 11.58 & 14.931 & 0.027 & 16.922 & 0.055 & 8.07 & 3.661 & 0.009 & 2.77 & 0.11 & 1.93 & 0.05 + 284 & 16.71 & 11.31 & 15.040 & 0.027 & 17.024 & 0.055 & 9.80 & 3.638 & 0.005 & 2.73 & 0.11 & 1.81 & 0.05 + 285 & 16.71 & 10.99 & 15.251 & 0.039 & 17.147 & 0.055 & 10.42 & 3.629 & 0.009 & 2.58 & 0.12 & 1.64 & 0.06 + 286 & 16.96 & 10.66 & 16.019 & 0.064 & 17.658 & 0.065 & 5.89 & 3.686 & 0.006 & 2.28 & 0.16 & 1.37 & 0.07 + 287 & 17.17 & 11.20 & 15.337 & 0.039 & 17.459 & 0.065 & 8.96 & 3.649 & 0.007 & 2.95 & 0.14 & 1.81 & 0.06 + 288 & 17.20 & 11.58 & 15.334 & 0.039 & 17.229 & 0.055 & 5.43 & 3.691 & 0.005 & 2.66 & 0.12 & 1.81 & 0.05 + 289 & 17.58 & 11.29 & 15.161 & 0.027 & 17.013 & 0.055 & 4.87 & 3.696 & 0.002 & 2.61 & 0.11 & 1.88 & 0.05 + 290 & 18.28 & 11.50 & 15.082 & 0.027 & 16.835 & 0.055 & 6.09 & 3.684 & 0.005 & 2.44 & 0.11 & 1.81 & 0.05 + 291 & 18.33 & 11.69 & 15.143 & 0.027 & 16.849 & 0.055 & 5.51 & 3.690 & 0.004 & 2.38 & 0.11 & 1.78 & 0.05 + 292 & 18.06 & 10.77 & 14.916 & 0.027 & 16.814 & 0.055 & 10.69 & 3.625 & 0.008 & 2.58 & 0.11 & 1.76 & 0.05 + 293 & 17.77 & 10.75 & 14.598 & 0.016 & 16.558 & 0.044 & 11.05 & 3.620 & 0.005 & 2.66 & 0.08 & 1.91 & 0.04 + 294 & 17.63 & 10.34 & 15.301 & 0.039 & 17.319 & 0.065 & 8.23 & 3.659 & 0.007 & 2.81 & 0.14 & 1.79 & 0.06 + 295 & -6.67 & 18.85 & 14.814 & 0.014 & 16.883 & 0.042 & 10.09 & 3.634 & 0.007 & 2.85 & 0.08 & 1.93 & 0.04 + 296 & -7.51 & 19.31 & 15.600 & 0.029 & 17.609 & 0.051 & 4.45 & 3.700 & 0.004 & 2.84 & 0.11 & 1.81 & 0.05 + 297 & -7.70 & 19.12 & 15.219 & 0.014 & 17.213 & 0.042 & 5.71 & 3.688 & 0.004 & 2.81 & 0.08 & 1.91 & 0.03 + 298 & -8.29 & 19.01 & 14.783 & 0.014 & 16.753 & 0.042 & 8.22 & 3.659 & 0.005 & 2.74 & 0.08 & 1.97 & 0.03 + 299 & -8.37 & 18.82 & 15.067 & 0.014 & 16.961 & 0.042 & 5.94 & 3.685 & 0.003 & 2.66 & 0.08 & 1.90 & 0.03 + 300 & -9.15 & 18.74 & 11.437 & 0.002 & 13.493 & 0.002 & 8.46 & 3.656 & 0.003 & 2.86 & 0.01 & 3.35 & 0.01 + 301 & -8.26 & 18.23 & 14.468 & 0.011 & 16.434 & 0.044 & 9.28 & 3.645 & 0.004 & 2.71 & 0.08 & 2.05 & 0.03 + 302 & -6.72 & 18.14 & 13.651 & 0.005 & 15.524 & 0.007 & 9.17 & 3.646 & 0.004 & 2.58 & 0.02 & 2.33 & 0.01 + 303 & -7.07 & 17.77 & 15.142 & 0.014 & 17.064 & 0.042 & 7.86 & 3.663 & 0.007 & 2.67 & 0.08 & 1.82 & 0.04 + 304 & -8.13 & 17.63 & 15.598 & 0.029 & 17.594 & 0.051 & 5.03 & 3.695 & 0.004 & 2.82 & 0.11 & 1.78 & 0.05 + 305 & -8.48 & 17.74 & 15.391 & 0.029 & 17.322 & 0.051 & 7.87 & 3.663 & 0.005 & 2.68 & 0.11 & 1.72 & 0.05 + 306 & -8.72 & 17.63 & 15.467 & 0.029 & 17.360 & 0.051 & 7.25 & 3.670 & 0.004 & 2.64 & 0.11 & 1.69 & 0.05 + 307 & -9.94 & 17.90 & 15.508 & 0.029 & 17.631 & 0.051 & 10.16 & 3.633 & 0.006 & 2.93 & 0.11 & 1.69 & 0.05 + 308 & -10.07 & 17.28 & 15.566 & 0.029 & 17.617 & 0.051 & 7.43 & 3.668 & 0.006 & 2.87 & 0.11 & 1.74 & 0.05 + 309 & -10.12 & 17.50 & 15.794 & 0.060 & 17.879 & 0.196 & 5.97 & 3.685 & 0.007 & 2.94 & 0.36 & 1.72 & 0.15 + 310 & -8.88 & 17.28 & 15.160 & 0.014 & 17.095 & 0.042 & 8.64 & 3.653 & 0.005 & 2.68 & 0.08 & 1.78 & 0.03 + 311 & -8.80 & 17.15 & 15.482 & 0.029 & 17.506 & 0.051 & 9.00 & 3.649 & 0.007 & 2.80 & 0.11 & 1.69 & 0.05 + 312 & -8.56 & 17.31 & 15.606 & 0.029 & 17.457 & 0.051 & 8.29 & 3.658 & 0.004 & 2.56 & 0.11 & 1.57 & 0.05 + 313 & -8.05 & 16.98 & 15.477 & 0.029 & 17.505 & 0.051 & 7.95 & 3.662 & 0.006 & 2.83 & 0.11 & 1.74 & 0.05 + 314 & -6.94 & 17.12 & 15.234 & 0.014 & 17.284 & 0.051 & 9.04 & 3.648 & 0.007 & 2.84 & 0.10 & 1.80 & 0.04 + 315 & -6.59 & 16.98 & 15.524 & 0.029 & 17.516 & 0.051 & 5.68 & 3.688 & 0.005 & 2.80 & 0.11 & 1.79 & 0.05 + 316 & -6.86 & 16.71 & 15.647 & 0.029 & 17.546 & 0.051 & 6.88 & 3.675 & 0.004 & 2.65 & 0.11 & 1.64 & 0.05 + 317 & -6.94 & 16.58 & 15.254 & 0.029 & 17.181 & 0.042 & 6.51 & 3.679 & 0.003 & 2.70 & 0.09 & 1.83 & 0.04 + 318 & -7.64 & 16.39 & 15.395 & 0.029 & 17.375 & 0.051 & 8.66 & 3.653 & 0.007 & 2.74 & 0.11 & 1.72 & 0.05 + 319 & -6.61 & 15.77 & 14.757 & 0.014 & 16.307 & 0.044 & 10.12 & 3.633 & 0.006 & 2.08 & 0.08 & 1.65 & 0.04 + 320 & -7.48 & 15.36 & 15.453 & 0.029 & 17.392 & 0.051 & 8.26 & 3.658 & 0.005 & 2.69 & 0.11 & 1.68 & 0.05 + 321 & -7.75 & 15.55 & 13.625 & 0.005 & 15.630 & 0.007 & 10.90 & 3.622 & 0.007 & 2.73 & 0.02 & 2.33 & 0.02 + 322 & -8.34 & 16.52 & 13.477 & 0.005 & 15.438 & 0.007 & 8.02 & 3.661 & 0.004 & 2.73 & 0.02 & 2.50 & 0.01 + 323 & -8.96 & 16.96 & 14.418 & 0.011 & 16.562 & 0.044 & 9.48 & 3.642 & 0.005 & 2.97 & 0.08 & 2.17 & 0.04 + 324 & -9.10 & 16.79 & 13.835 & 0.008 & 15.898 & 0.039 & 10.18 & 3.633 & 0.005 & 2.84 & 0.07 & 2.32 & 0.03 + 325 & -8.53 & 15.66 & 12.615 & 0.003 & 14.755 & 0.006 & 9.82 & 3.638 & 0.005 & 2.96 & 0.01 & 2.87 & 0.02 + 326 & -8.59 & 15.34 & 13.698 & 0.005 & 15.683 & 0.007 & 10.55 & 3.627 & 0.005 & 2.71 & 0.02 & 2.31 & 0.01 + 327 & -9.05 & 15.28 & 12.764 & 0.004 & 14.750 & 0.005 & 9.86 & 3.637 & 0.006 & 2.73 & 0.02 & 2.72 & 0.02 + 328 & -9.18 & 15.85 & 15.145 & 0.014 & 17.151 & 0.042 & 6.83 & 3.675 & 0.004 & 2.81 & 0.08 & 1.90 & 0.03 + 329 & -9.99 & 15.98 & 14.581 & 0.011 & 16.522 & 0.044 & 5.01 & 3.695 & 0.004 & 2.73 & 0.08 & 2.16 & 0.03 + [ gc_table ] the gc h - r diagram is shown in figure [ hr ] . our data clearly show the red clump at @xmath67 , as well as the upper red giant branch / early asymptotic giant branch . there is an indication of the agb bump at @xmath68 , and we also detect some lower red giant branch stars at lower luminosities , though the observations are highly incomplete in this region . the data set in figure [ hr ] allows for a more robust analysis of the galactic center star formation history than any other previously published data set . photometric studies are limited to the modeling of luminosities alone @xcite , due to intrinsic variations in late - type giant colors and the large variation in galactic center extinction . this point is illustrated in figure [ cmd ] , which compares the observed h - r diagram to a color - magnitude diagram ( cmd ) for the same gc stars . the rgb / agb and rc populations are more clearly distinguished in the h - r diagram than in the cmd , and there is less scatter in @xmath7 than @xmath69 , due to variations in gc extinction . as a result , only the k - band luminosity function can reliably be modeled with broadband photometry alone . the observed h - r diagram in this study is also an improvement with respect to previous spectroscopic work @xcite , due to our improved magnitude limit ( @xmath55 mag . deeper ) , which allows for the analysis of well - populated regions in the h - r diagram , in which the evolutionary models are fairly well understood . than @xmath70 , due to variations in gc extinction . ] the errors in temperature and luminosity are shown with the data in grey in figure [ hr ] . average errors in temperature and luminosity for stars with luminosities @xmath71 ( the red clump region ) are shown at right . the temperature limit for the minimum co index and the 50% completeness limit for the average extinction correction ( @xmath72 mag . ) are also shown . solar metallicity ( in red , left ) and metal - poor ( z=0.008 , in blue , right ) isochrones from @xcite are overplotted . the isochrones show the wide range of ages spanned by the galactic center population . figure [ hr ] also demonstrates the age - metallicity degeneracy inherent in this part of the diagram . stars in the same part of the h - r diagram may represent a metal - rich , intermediate - age ( @xmath73 a few gyr ) population or a metal - poor , old ( @xmath74 5 gyr ) population . for stars younger than @xmath55 gyr , the galactic center stellar population is known to be approximately solar @xcite . for older stars , the galactic center metallicity distribution is not well - known . we will address this uncertainty later in the paper . to investigate the star formation history implied by our sample , we begin with a qualitative discussion , followed by quantitative analysis in 3.4 - 3.5 . we start by considering three models based on candidate star formation histories presented in the literature . the first scenario consists of an ancient burst of star formation 7.5 - 8.5 gyr ago , similar to the single stellar population of the bulge . @xcite compared this scenario to the k band luminosity function ( klf ) of the inner parsec . the second model consists of constant star formation between 10 myr and 10 gyr ago . this model is based on the best - fit model of @xcite , who considered the galactic center klf within 40 pc of the center . the third model corresponds to the best - fit star formation history of @xcite , who fit the h - r diagram of asymptotic giant branch and cool supergiant stars within the central 5 pc , using four specified age bins . all models are summarized in table [ sf_models ] . llccccccccc 1 & bulge - like & 7.50 - 8.50 & 0.015 & 2.35 & 0.7 & 120 & 3228.8 & 0.00 & 1.00 & - + 2 & continuous & 0.01 - 10.0 & 0.019 & 2.35 & 0.7 & 120 & 404.9 & 3.76 & 1.00 & - + 3 & blum et al . & 0.01 - 0.10 & 0.019 & 2.35 & 0.7 & 120 & 678.8 & 0.01 & 0.65 & - + & & 0.10 - 1.00 & 0.019 & 2.35 & 0.7 & 120 & & & 0.06 & - + & & 1.00 - 5.00 & 0.019 & 2.35 & 0.7 & 120 & & & 0.09 & - + & & 5.00 - 12.0 & 0.019 & 2.35 & 0.7 & 120 & & & 0.21 & - + 4 & two - bin , solar & 0.01 - 5.00 & 0.019 & 2.35 & 0.7 & 120 & 384.5 & 3.03 & 0.82 & 0.04 + & & 5.00 - 12.0 & 0.019 & 2.35 & 0.7 & 120 & & & 0.18 & 0.07 + 5 & two - bin , solar & 0.01 - 7.00 & 0.019 & 2.35 & 0.7 & 120 & 270.0 & 16.66 & 0.90 & 0.04 + & & 7.00 - 12.0 & 0.019 & 2.35 & 0.7 & 120 & & & 0.10 & 0.09 + 6 & two - bin , poor & 0.01 - 5.00 & 0.019 & 2.35 & 0.7 & 120 & 450.0 & 0.68 & 0.91 & 0.05 + & & 5.00 - 12.0 & 0.008 & 2.35 & 0.7 & 120 & & & 0.09 & 0.08 + 7 & closed - box & 0.01 - 12.0 & 0.004 - 0.019 & 2.35 & 0.7 & 120 & 1035.6 & 0.00 & 1.00 & - + 8 & flat imf & 0.01 - 12.0 & 0.019 & 0.85 & 0.7 & 120 & 242.8 & 39.70 & 1.00 & - + 9 & high @xmath75 & 0.01 - 12.0 & 0.019 & 2.35 & 2.5 & 120 & 4201.8 & 0.00 & 1.00 & - + 10 & high @xmath75 & 0.01 - 12.0 & 0.019 & 2.35 & 1.5 & 120 & 551.4 & 0.00 & 1.00 & - + 11 & model 5 + 8 hybrid & 0.01 - 7.00 & 0.019 & 0.85 & 0.7 & 120 & 257.0 & 26.3 & 0.48 & 0.02 + & & 7.00 - 12.0 & 0.019 & 0.85 & 0.7 & 120 & & & 0.51 & 0.20 + [ sf_models ] for each scenario , we generated model h - r diagrams using the synthetic color - magnitude diagram computation algorithm iac - star @xcite . the algorithm uses a monte carlo approach to compute composite stellar populations on a star - by - star basis , using a specified set of evolutionary tracks . the code accommodates several additional inputs , including the initial mass function , star formation rate function , and chemical enrichment law . to compare the generated models to the data , we added gaussian noise based on the average observed errors in luminosity and temperature . we also randomly removed stars from the models according to our estimated spectroscopic completeness ( fig [ comp_err ] ) . the models are shown against our galactic center sample in figure [ sf_models_lit ] . a qualitative comparison suggests that the ancient burst model is insufficient to fully describe the observed data set . the continuous star formation model and the @xcite model span the full range in temperature and luminosity of the observed data set but seem to have relatively too many stars at cool temperatures . it is unlikely this observed effect is caused by systematic errors or a selection bias . a systematic underestimate of the gc co indices would shift the pattern to hotter temperatures . however , the red edge of the hertzsprung gap ( log @xmath7 @xmath76 ) is well matched by the models , making such a systematic effect unlikely . in addition , some cool rgb / agb stars are present in the data , while a systematic shift to warmer temperatures would allow none . finally , the brightness and co strength of cool rgb / agb stars compared to warmer , dimmer red clump stars means that cool rgb / agb stars are relatively easy to detect and classify . there is no obvious way of selectively removing these stars from the sample . motivated by the comparison in figure [ sf_models_lit ] , we consider three alternative scenarios that could potentially explain the relative paucity of stars at low temperatures : 1 . the first and simplest possibility is that the star formation rate was low at early times ( @xmath77 gyr ) . to test this hypothesis , we generated two models consisting of linear combinations of constant star formation in two specified age bins ( models 4 and 5 in table [ sf_models ] ) . model 4 assumes bins of 0.01 - 5 gyr and 5 - 12 gyr . model 5 assumes bins of 0.01 - 7 gyr and 7 - 12 gyr . a second possibility is that the oldest stars are metal poor . the previously described models assume a solar metallicity for all times . this assumption is motivated by the work of @xcite , who found the stellar [ fe / h ] abundance to be approximately solar for stars younger than @xmath55 gyr . for older stars , the galactic center metallicity distribution has not been determined . however , the bulge , which formed 7 - 12 gyr ago , is known to have a nearly solar distribution @xcite . an extremely metal poor ancient population would , therefore , represent a completely separate population from the bulge . given the current observed differences between the bulge and the nucleus discussed in 1 , we can not exclude this possibility . we , therefore , generated two models to represent this scenario . the first model , model 6 , consists of a linear combination of constant star formation in two age bins with solar metallicity for 0.01 - 5 gyr and a metallicity of 0.008 for 5 - 12 gyr . the second model , model 7 , is a simple closed box model assuming constant star formation for 0.01 - 12 gyr , a starting metallicity of 0.004 and an ending metallicity of solar . 3 . a final way to explain the relative lack of stars at cool temperatures invokes a non - standard initial mass function ( imf ) . in all above models , we assume a salpeter imf with an upper mass limit of 120 @xmath78 and a lower mass limit of 0.7 @xmath78 . as stars less massive than @xmath79 have main sequence lifetimes comparable to the age of the universe , we are not sensitive to stars below this mass limit . recent results indicate that the current initial mass function of the galactic center is flatter than a salpeter function or has an unusally high lower mass cut - off @xcite . such a mass function could explain the relative lack of low mass stars in the observed old stellar population . to test this hypothesis , we consider three models , all assuming continuous star formation at solar metallicity for 0.01 - 12 gyr . the first model , model 8 , assumes a flat single power - law slope ( @xmath80 ) , chosen to match the results of @xcite . models 9 and 10 both assume a standard salpeter slope ( @xmath81 ) , but with lower mass limits of 2.5 @xmath78 and 1.5 @xmath78 , respectively . results stemming from these three hypotheses are tested in 3.5 . to quantitatively compare the models described above to the data , we adopted the numerical techniques described in @xcite . we first binned the observed and model h - r diagrams in temperature and luminosity for stars above our 50% completeness threshold , using uniform bins with size three times our average errors ( @xmath82 , @xmath83 ) . the choice of bins in this technique is somewhat subjective . however , tests using different bins sizes showed that while the binning scheme does change the fit quality , it does not significantly affect the derived star formation rates . this finding is in agreement with @xcite . for models with two age bins , we used the numerical recipes procedure amoeba @xcite to search for the linear combination of models that minimized the poisson maximum likelihood parameter : @xmath84 @xcite . here , @xmath85 is the number of observed stars and @xmath86 is the number of model stars in bin @xmath87 . for models with fixed relative star formation rates , we scaled the model distribution to minimize @xmath88 . to estimate the errors in the derived star formation history , we implemented the technique described in @xcite . we built a set of 100 h - r diagrams consisting of a random sampling of 329 stars drawn from the observed h - r diagram , allowing each observed star to be selected any number of times . we then re - derived the star formation history for each h - r diagram and given model . the resulting standard deviation in the derived star formation rate was taken as the 1@xmath39 uncertainty . we measured the fit quality through a second set of monte carlo simulations . in this set , we generated 10,000 synthetic data sets drawn from the fitted models , selecting 329 stars randomly for each trial and re - deriving the star formation history for the selected subset . for a model that is an accurate representation of the true star formation history , @xmath88 derived from the actual data set should be comparable to @xmath88 derived from a typical synthetic data set . therefore , to establish the goodness of fit , we calculated the percentage of trials , @xmath89 , in which @xmath88 was larger when fitting the synthetic data sets to the models than when fitting the true data sample to the models . if the model is a good representation of the true star formation history , @xmath89 should be approximately 50% . the results of all model fits are listed in table [ sf_models ] . hess diagrams showing the difference between the observed data histogram and the best - fit model histograms are shown in figure [ hess ] . white indicates regions where the model produces too many stars relative to the observed data set , and black indicates regions where the model produces too few stars relative to the observed data set . examination of the @xmath89 values in table [ sf_models ] confirms the qualitative result discussed in 3.3 that no literature model ( models 1 - 3 ) is a likely description of the observed data set . this result is also reflected in the first three panels in figure [ hess ] , which show white diagonal streaks , corresponding to the overdensity of cool stars in the models relative to the data . table [ sf_models ] also suggests that the early - history low star formation rate models ( models 4 and 5 ) are unlikely representations of the data , though model 5 returns a considerably better fit , and we are unable to completely exclude this model . however , examination of the fourth and fifth panels in figure [ hess ] show that both models systematically overpredict the number of cool stars , as in models 1 - 3 . the early - history low metallicity models ( models 6 and 7 ) also show systematic deficiencies when compared to the data . both models predict a red clump / horizontal branch morphology that is too blue compared to the observed distribution . similar discrepencies between the models and data are present in the high imf mass limit models ( models 9 and 10 ) . each predicts a hotter and more luminous red clump than is observed . however , while models 9 and 10 predict no old , cool stars , the flat imf model ( model 8) predicts few old , cool stars , in good agreement with the observations . model 8 also gives a satisfactory goodness of fit ( @xmath89 = 40% ) suggesting that this model is a likely representation of the observed distribution . using the models listed in table [ sf_models ] , we tested for population differences as a function of distance from the cluster center . such differences within the central 1 - 2 pc are expected due to mass segregation , and several broadband photometry studies have found indications of such an effect @xcite . to test for this effect in our data , we separated the data into two sets containing the four innermost ( @xmath90 , @xmath91 median ) and outermost ( @xmath92 , @xmath93 median ) spectral regions shown in figure [ mos ] . we then refit the two best - fit models ( models 5 and 8) to each subset , applying the average errors and completeness specific to that subset . this process returned fits for each subset that are consistent with those obtained for the entire data set . in particular , the subset @xmath89 values were within 10% of that obtained for the entire data set , and the relative star formation rates returned by both subsets for model 5 were within 1@xmath39 of the rates returned by the entire data set . we therefore , find no significant evidence in our data for a population gradient . this result is not that surprising , as the broadband photometry results of @xcite suggest that variations in the cool , low - mass stellar population within the central parsec should be most evident 3 - 7 arcsec from sgr a@xmath0 . our sample is outside of the region expected to exhibit the largest population differences ( see figure [ mos ] ) . in the future , the technique we describe could be applied to regions closer to sgr a@xmath0 , although limited spectroscopic completeness due to increased stellar density would complicate such a study . still , a thorough spectroscopic study of the red - clump and rgb / agb populations as a function of distance from sgr a@xmath0 could provide the first definitive test of mass segregation within the central parsec @xcite . with the restriction to simple models , the top - heavy imf model appears to be superior to the remaining three model families we consider ( low star formation rate ( sfr ) at early times , low metallicity at early times , imf with high lower mass limit ) . the low - sfr , low - z , and high @xmath75 families all show consistent systematic deficiencies when compared to the data . it is , therefore , unlikely one could slightly change the chosen parameters ( i.e. precise metallicity , age bin cut - offs , mass ranges , etc . ) within these families to produce a model that is an adequate description of the data . of the models considered in table [ sf_models ] , model 8 ( continuous star formation at solar metallicity with a top - heavy imf ) fits the observations best , and our monte carlo tests show that it is a reasonable description of the data . based on the goodness of fit , we can not completely exclude model 5 . however , as discussed in the previous section , this model shows systematic deviations from the data ; we , therefore , favor model 8 . we note that model 8 is probably not the only possible description of the data with this degree of likelihood . all models so far discussed assume a simplistic description of the gc star formation history , and there are likely more complicated scenarios that also adequately describe the data . for instance , an additional model with age bins identical to model 5 and an imf slope identical to model 8 yields a reasonable fit ( @xmath94 , @xmath95 ) . however , we do not feel that increasing the number of free parameters is justified , given the limits , uncertainties , and size of our data set . in the context of our current knowledge about the galactic center , continuous star formation with a top - heavy imf is reasonable . at present , there is substantial evidence for stars in the galactic nucleus spanning a wide range of ages , based on results from broadband photometry , and several distinct age tracers , including supergiants , agb stars , and oh / ir stars ( see 1 ) . the present distribution and kinematics of gas in the inner galaxy is also consistent with continuous star formation @xcite . in addition , the most recent epoch of star formation in the galactic center is likely represented by a top - heavy initial mass function @xcite . if this recent epoch of star formation is not anomolous and periodic bursts of gc star formation have occurred throughout the history of the galaxy , there is no a priori reason to believe the gc imf would change with time . the present data set appears to support this picture . we note that the mass traced by giants in the central cluster is primarily set by the initial mass formed , rather than dynamical effects , since mass segregation is expected to only strongly affect the central @xmath50.01 pc of the galactic center @xcite . on the 1 - 2 pc scale studied in this paper , the efficiency of mass segregation is thought to be much lower , in agreement with observational photometry results @xcite . though our findings are broadly consistent with several stellar population studies of the galactic center and the nucleus at large , there remains some disagreement . in particular , our results are somewhat different from those presented in @xcite , who probed the central 5 pc and used supergiants and bright agb stars to quantify the star formation history in a method very similar to that employed here . using their observed h - r diagram , @xcite argued for variable star formation over a wide range of ages , with the majority of stars formed more than 5 gyr ago at solar metallicity . we find a much smaller fraction of our sample is represented by solar - metallicity low - mass stars with ages @xmath74 5 gyr . the present work and the work of @xcite study different regions in the h - r diagram . each regime has relative advantages and disadvantages for studying the gc star formation history , and we discuss each in turn : 1 . _ field of view _ : due to the rarity of supergiants and bright agb stars in the galactic center , @xcite probed all late - type stars above their magnitude limit for the entire central cluster ( r @xmath96 pc ) . they , therefore , derived absolute star formation rates and were able to compare the cluster mass implied to estimates from dynamical studies . in contrast , our study probes a relatively small region on the sky ( @xmath50.2 pc@xmath34 within r @xmath97 pc ) . as such , our results are somewhat susceptible to population inhomogeneities in the central cluster , and we are able to derive only relative star formation rates . stellar crowding _ : spectral extraction from our sinfoni fields is complicated by stellar crowding . while we took care to ensure that our derived co indices are largely independent of exact pixel and background selection , contamination by neighboring stellar spectra remains a source of uncertainty for many of the dim stars . the stars studied by @xcite , on the other hand , are well separated from each other . in addition , the gc agbs and supergiants are much brighter than neighboring stars , so there is negligible uncertainty in the @xcite spectra due to crowding . spectral classification _ : the spectral classification method presented by @xcite is very similar to that presented here . our depper study has the advantage that only giants are observed , and thus , a separate luminosity class determination is not required . additionally , the stars we study are warmer than those studied by @xcite , and thus , our co-@xmath7 relationship is tighter than theirs , due to reduced uncertainties in model atmosphere spectra at warmer temperatures @xcite . we further note that the derived temperatures for the red supergiants in the work of @xcite are likely systematically too cool , as @xcite recently showed that red supergiants are @xmath5400 k warmer than previously thought . adequacy of stellar evolution models _ : the evolutionary models in the part of the h - r diagram probed by our study ( red clump , red giant branch , early agb ) are much less uncertain than the part of the h - r diagram studied by @xcite ( supergiants , tp - agbs ) . @xcite review the adequacy of agb stellar evolution models for deriving star formation histories , concluding that the observed bright agb populations are often more sensitive to poorly known modeling parameters than the star formation history . the input physics for the late agb stages is not well determined ( e.g. mass loss , convection , efficiency of the third dredge - up ) , and currently , only the padova libraries include these stages @xcite . while uncertainties in mass loss and convection are also present for the red clump , rgb , and early agb , the input physics for these stages is much better understood , and a number of stellar evolution models including these phases have been compared and tested against observations . for this reason , we believe our star formation history fit is more reliable than that presented in @xcite . finally , our data set also has the benefit that it contains several evolutionary features ( red clump , agb bump ) that are cleraly distinguishable from surrounding regions in the h - r diagram . the diagram morphology assures us that no large systematic effects are present in the data and allows us to construct physically motivated models . the region of the h - r diagram studied by @xcite has no such morphological features . while we believe that our results are more robust than those presented in @xcite , we also note that the findings are not necessarily in conflict . the region probed by @xcite extends to @xmath52.5 pc from the center , whereas we probe only the central parsec . furthermore , we note that there are some similarities in our findings . both studies find evidence for star formation throughout the history of the galaxy , and both studies suggest that purely solar metallicity models are needed to produce the observed data . still , further work is needed to resolve the remaining discrepencies ( i.e. , variable versus continuous star formation , salpeter versus flat imf ) . specifically , a sample tracing a large region on the sky and containing thousands of stars would represent a significant step forward in this field . the planned flamingos-2 gc survey on gemini @xcite will obtain 4000 late - type giant spectra out to one degree in galacto - centric radius ( @xmath5140 pc ) and with a spectral resolution of r@xmath520,000 . it will , therefore , provide unprecedented information on the galactic center chemical enrichment and star formation history . we observed 329 late - type giants @xmath98 north of sgr a@xmath0 with the integral field spectrometer sinfoni on the vlt . combining spectral classifications with naco photometry , we derived luminosities and effective temperatures for these stars . due to the improved magnitude limit of our sample relative to previous work , our derived h - r diagram clearly shows the red clump , as well as the red giant branch and asymptotic giant branch . using a maximum likelihood analysis , we compared the observed distribution to models representing ten possible star formation histories . the best - fit model corresponds to continuous star formation over the last 12 gyr with a top - heavy imf . the similarity of this result to the imf observed for the most recent epoch of star formation is intriguing and perhaps suggests a connection between recent star formation and the stars formed throughout the history of the galactic center . the upcoming flamingos-2 gc survey on gemini will provide important information needed to further understand this suggestive result . the authors thank amiel sternberg for his helpful discussions and insights . is grateful to the graduate research fellowship program at nsf and the graduate opportunity program fellowship at uc berkeley for funding this research . acknowleges support from the alexander von humboldt foundation . t.a . is supported by minerva grant 8563 and a new faculty grant by sir h. djangoly , cbe , of london , uk . this work has been supported by the national science foundation science through ast 0205999 and the center for adaptive optics , managed by the university of california at santa cruz under cooperative agreement no . ast 9876783 . this work has made use of the iac - star synthetic cmd computation code . iac - star is suported and maintained by the computer division of the instituto de astrofisica de canarias . adelman , s. j. , pintado , o. i. , nieva , f. , rayle , k. e. , & sanders , s. e. 2002 , , 392 , 1031 alexander , t. , & sternberg , a. 1999 , , 520 , 137 alexander , t. 2005 , , 419 , 65 alonso , a. , arribas , s. , & martnez - roger , c. 1999 , , 139 , 335 aparicio , a. , & gallart , c. 2004 , , 128 , 1465 ballero , s. k. , matteucci , f. , origlia , l. , & rich , r. m. 2007 , , 467 , 123 bell , r. a. , & gustafsson , b. 1989 , , 236 , 653 bessell , m. s. , & brett , j. m. 1988 , , 100 , 1134 blackwell , d. e. , & lynas - gray , a. e. 1994 , , 282 , 899 blackwell , d. e. , & lynas - gray , a. e. 1998 , , 129 , 505 blum , r. d. , sellgren , k. , & depoy , d. l. 1996a , , 470 , 864 blum , r. d. , sellgren , k. , & depoy , d. l. 1996b , , 112 , 1988 blum , r. d. , ramrez , s. v. , sellgren , k. , & olsen , k. 2003 , , 597 , 323 bonnet , h. , et al . 2003 , , 4839 , 329 carpenter , j. m. 2001 , , 121 , 2851 carr , j. s. , sellgren , k. , & balachandran , s. c. 2000 , , 530 , 307 davidge , t. j. , simons , d. a. , rigaut , f. , doyon , r. , & crampton , d. 1997 , , 114 , 2586 diolaiti , e. , bendinelli , o. , bonaccini , d. , close , l. , currie , d. , & parmeggiani , g. 2000 , , 147 , 335 dolphin , a. 1997 , new astronomy , 2 , 397 dolphin , a. e. 2002 , , 332 , 91 dyck , h. m. , benson , j. a. , van belle , g. t. , & ridgway , s. t. 1996 , , 111 , 1705 eikenberry , s. , et al . 2006 , , 6269 , eisenhauer , f. , et al . 2003a , the messenger , 113 , 17 eisenhauer , f. , et al . 2003b , , 4841 , 1548 eisenhauer , f. , schdel , r. , genzel , r. , ott , t. , tecza , m. , abuter , r. , eckart , a. , & alexander , t. 2003c , , 597 , l121 engelke , c. w. 1992 , , 104 , 1248 feast , m. w. 1996 , , 278 , 11 figer , d. f. , mclean , i. s. , & morris , m. 1999 , , 514 , 202 figer , d. f. , et al . 2002 , , 581 , 258 figer , d. f. , rich , r. m. , kim , s. s. , morris , m. , & serabyn , e. 2004 , , 601 , 319 freitag , m. , amaro - seoane , p. , & kalogera , v. 2006 , , 649 , 91 frogel , j. a. , persson , s. e. , matthews , k. , & aaronson , m. 1978 , , 220 , 75 fitzgerald , m. p. , & graham , j. r. 2006 , , 637 , 541 fluks , m. a. , plez , b. , the , p. s. , de winter , d. , westerlund , b. e. , & steenman , h. c. 1994 , , 105 , 311 gallart , c. , zoccali , m. , & aparicio , a. 2005 , , 43 , 387 genzel , r. , et al . 2003 , , 594 , 812 ghez , a. m. , salim , s. , hornstein , s. d. , tanner , a. , lu , j. r. , morris , m. , becklin , e. e. , & duchne , g. 2005 , , 620 , 744 girardi , l. , bressan , a. , bertelli , g. , & chiosi , c. 2000 , , 141 , 371 gray , d. f. , & brown , k. 2001 , , 113 , 723 guesten , r. , genzel , r. , wright , m. c. h. , jaffe , d. t. , stutzki , j. , & harris , a. i. 1987 , , 318 , 124 hartung , m. , et al.2003 , , 4841 , 425 hopman , c. , & alexander , t. 2006 , , 645 , l133 jackson , j. m. , geis , n. , genzel , r. , harris , a. i. , madden , s. , poglitsch , a. , stacey , g. j. , & townes , c. h. 1993 , , 402 , 173 kent , s. m. 1992 , , 387 , 181 kleinmann , s. g. , & hall , d. n. b. 1986 , , 62 , 501 kormendy , j. , & kennicutt , r. c. , jr . 2004 , , 42 , 603 krabbe , a. , genzel , r. , drapatz , s. , & rotaciuc , v. 1991 , , 382 , l19 krabbe , a. , et al . 1995 , , 447 , l95 launhardt , r. , zylka , r. , & mezger , p. g. 2002 , , 384 , 112 levesque , e. m. , massey , p. , olsen , k. a. g. , plez , b. , josselin , e. , maeder , a. , & meynet , g. 2005 , , 628 , 973 lindqvist , m. , habing , h. j. , & winnberg , a. 1992 , , 259 , 118 malagnini , m. l. , & morossi , c. 1990 , , 85 , 1015 malagnini , m. l. , & morossi , c. 1997 , , 326 , 736 martins , f. , genzel , r. , hillier , d. j. , eisenhauer , f. , paumard , t. , gillessen , s. , ott , t. , & trippe , s. 2007 , , 468 , 233 mccaughrean , m. j. , close , l. m. , scholz , r .- d . , lenzen , r. , biller , b. , brandner , w. , hartung , m. , & lodieu , n. 2004 , , 413 , 1029 morris , m. , & serabyn , e. 1996 , , 34 , 645 narayanan , v. k. , gould , a. , & depoy , d. l. 1996 , , 472 , 183 nayakshin , s. , & sunyaev , r. 2005 , , 364 , l23 paumard , t. , et al . 2006 , , 643 , 1011 perrin , g. , coude du foresto , v. , ridgway , s. t. , mariotti , j .- m . , traub , w. a. , carleton , n. p. , & lacasse , m. g. 1998 , , 331 , 619 persson , s. e. , murphy , d. c. , krzeminski , w. , roth , m. , & rieke , m. j. 1998 , , 116 , 2475 philipp , s. , zylka , r. , mezger , p. g. , duschl , w. j. , herbst , t. , & tuffs , r. j. 1999 , , 348 , 768 press , w. h. , teukolsky , s. a. , vetterling , w. t. , & flannery , b. p. 1992 , cambridge : university press , |c1992 , 2nd ed . , ramirez , s. v. , depoy , d. l. , frogel , j. a. , sellgren , k. , & blum , r. d. 1997 , , 113 , 1411 ramrez , s. v. , sellgren , k. , carr , j. s. , balachandran , s. c. , blum , r. , terndrup , d. m. , & steed , a. 2000 , , 537 , 205 ramrez , i. , & melndez , j. 2005 , , 626 , 446 reid , m. j. 1993 , , 31 , 345 reid , n. & hawley , s. l. 2000 , new light on dark stars : red dwarfs , low mass stars , brown dwarfs / neill reid and suzanne l. hawley . new york : springer , 2000 . ( springer - praxis series in astronomy and astrophysics ) rieke , m. j. 1987 , nearly normal galaxies . from the planck time to the present , 90 rieke , m. j. 1999 , asp conf . ser . 186 : the central parsecs of the galaxy , 186 , 32 rousset , g. , et al . 2003 , , 4839 , 140 sadler , e. m. , rich , r. m. , & terndrup , d. m. 1996 , , 112 , 171 schoedel , r. , et al . 2007 , arxiv astrophysics e - prints , arxiv : astro - ph/0703178 schreiber , j. , thatte , n. , eisenhauer , f. , tecza , m. , abuter , r. , & horrobin , m. 2004 , asp conf . ser . 314 : astronomical data analysis software and systems ( adass ) xiii , 314 , 380 sellgren , k. , hall , d. n. b. , kleinmann , s. g. , & scoville , n. z. 1987 , , 317 , 881 serabyn , e. , keene , j. , lis , d. c. , & phillips , t. g. 1994 , , 424 , l95 sheehy , c. d. , mccrady , n. , & graham , j. r. 2006 , , 647 , 1517 sjouwerman , l. o. , habing , h. j. , lindqvist , m. , van langevelde , h. j. , & winnberg , a. 1999 , asp conf . ser . 186 : the central parsecs of the galaxy , 186 , 379 smalley , b. 1993 , , 265 , 1035 sokolov , n. a. 1998 , , 130 , 215 stolte , a. , brandner , w. , grebel , e. k. , lenzen , r. , & lagrange , a .- m . 2005 , , 628 , l113 taylor , b. j. 2003 , , 398 , 721 theodossiou , e. , & danezis , e. 1991 , , 183 , 91 vacca , w. d. , sheehy , c. d. , & graham , j. r. 2007 , arxiv astrophysics e - prints , arxiv : astro - ph/0701628 van dam , m. a. , le mignant , d. , & maccintosh , b. a. 2004 , appl opt . , 43 , 5458 van loon , j. t. , et al . 2003 , , 338 , 857 wallace , l. , & hinkle , k. 1997 , , 111 , 445 wood , p. r. , habing , h. j. , & mcgregor , p. j. 1998 , , 336 , 925 zoccali , m. , et al . 2003 , , 399 , 931 zoccali , m. , et al . 2006 , , 457 , l1 Abstract:

Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.

Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered . Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video . Paper: event shape variables are perhaps the most popular observables for testing qcd and for improving our understanding of its dynamics . event shape studies began in earnest towards the late seventies as a simple quantitative method to understand the nature of gluon bremsstrahlung @xcite . for instance , it was on the basis of comparisons to event shape data that one could first deduce that gluons were vector particles , since theoretical predictions employing scalar gluons did not agree with experiment @xcite . quite generally , event shapes parametrise the geometrical properties of the energy - momentum flow of an event and their values are therefore directly related to the appearance of an event in the detector . in other words the value of a given event shape encodes in a continuous fashion , for example , the transition from pencil - like two - jet events with hadron flow prominently distributed along some axis , to planar three - jet events or events with a spherical distribution of hadron momenta . thus they provide more detailed information on the final state geometry than say a jet finding algorithm which would always classify an event as having a certain finite number of jets , even if the actual energy flow is uniformly distributed in the detector and there is no prominent jet structure present in the first place . event shapes are well suited to testing qcd mainly because , by construction , they are collinear and infrared safe observables . this means that one can safely compute them in perturbation theory and use the predictions as a means of extracting the strong coupling @xmath1 . they are also well suited for determinations of other parameters of the theory such as constraining the quark and gluon colour factors as well as the qcd beta function . additionally they have also been used in other studies for characterising the final state , such as investigations of jet and heavy quark multiplicities as functions of event shape variables @xcite . aside from testing the basic properties of qcd , event shape distributions are a powerful probe of our more detailed knowledge of qcd dynamics . all the commonly studied event shape variables have the property that in the region where the event shape value is small , one is sensitive primarily to gluon emission that is soft compared to the hard scale of the event and/or collinear to one of the hard partons . such small - transverse - momentum emissions have relatively large emission probabilities ( compared to their high transverse momentum counterparts ) due to logarithmic soft - collinear dynamical enhancements as well as the larger value of their coupling to the hard partons . predictions for event shape distributions therefore typically contain large logarithms in the region where the event - shape is small , which are a reflection of the importance of multiple soft and/or collinear emission . a successful prediction for an event shape in this region requires all - order resummed perturbative predictions or the use of a monte - carlo event generator , which contains correctly the appropriate dynamics governing multiple particle production . comparisons of these predictions to experimental data are therefore a stringent test of the understanding qcd dynamics that has been reached so far . one other feature of event shapes , that at first appeared as an obstacle to their use in extracting the fundamental parameters of qcd , is the presence of significant non - perturbative effects in the form of power corrections that vary as an inverse power of the hard scale , @xmath2 . for most event shapes , phenomenologically it was found that @xmath3 ( as discussed in @xcite ) , and the resulting non - perturbative effects can be of comparable size to next - to - leading order perturbative predictions , as we shall discuss presently . the problem however , can be handled to a large extent by hadronisation models embedded in monte - carlo event generators @xcite , which model the conversion of partons into hadrons at the cost of introducing several parameters that need to be tuned to the data . once this is done , application of such hadronisation models leads to very successful comparisons of perturbative predictions with experimental data with , for example , values of @xmath1 consistent to those obtained from other methods and with relatively small errors . however since the mid - nineties attempts have also been made to obtain a better insight into the physics of hadronisation and power corrections in particular . theoretical models such as those based on renormalons have been developed to probe the non - perturbative domain that gives rise to power corrections ( for a review , see @xcite ) . since the power corrections are relatively large effects for event shape variables , scaling typically as @xmath4 ( no other class of observable shows such large effects ) , event shapes have become the most widely used means of investigating the validity of these ideas . in fact an entire phenomenology of event shapes has developed which is based on accounting for non - perturbative effects via such theoretically inspired models , and including them in fits to event shape data alongside the extraction of other standard qcd parameters . in this way event shapes also serve as a tool for understanding more quantitatively the role of confinement effects . the layout of this article is as follows . in the following section we list the definitions of several commonly studied event shapes in @xmath5 annihilation and deep inelastic scattering ( dis ) and discuss briefly some of their properties . then in section [ sec : perturbative ] we review the state of the art for perturbative predictions of event - shape mean values and distributions . in particular , we examine the need for resummed predictions for distributions and clarify the nomenclature and notation used in that context , as well as the problem of matching these predictions to fixed order computations . we then turn , in sections [ sec : exp ] and [ sec : distributions ] , to comparisons with experimental data and the issue of non - perturbative corrections , required in order to be able to apply parton level calculations to hadronic final state data . we discuss the various approaches used to estimate non - perturbative corrections , ranging from phenomenological hadronisation models to analytical approaches based on renormalons , and shape - functions . we also discuss methods where the standard perturbative results are modified by use of renormalisation group improvements or the use of ` dressed gluons ' . we study fits to event shape data , from different sources , in both @xmath5 annihilation and dis and compare the various approaches that are adopted to make theoretical predictions . in addition we display some of the results obtained by fitting data for various event shape variables for parameters such as the strong coupling , the qcd colour factors and the qcd beta function . lastly , in section [ sec : outlook ] , we present an outlook on possible future developments in the field . we list here the most widely studied event shapes , concentrating on those that have received significant experimental and theoretical attention . _ the _ canonical event shape is the thrust @xcite , @xmath6 : @xmath7 where the numerator is maximised over directions of the unit vector @xmath8 and the sum is over all final - state hadron momenta @xmath9 ( whose three - vectors are @xmath10 and energies @xmath11 ) . the resulting @xmath8 is known as the thrust axis . in the limit of two narrow back - to - back jets @xmath12 , while its minimum value of @xmath13 corresponds to events with a uniform distribution of momentum flow in all directions . the infrared and collinear safety of the thrust ( and other event shapes ) is an essential consequence of its linearity in momenta . often it is @xmath14 ( also called @xmath15 ) that is referred to insofar as it is this that vanishes in the @xmath16-jet limit . a number of other commonly studied event shapes are constructed employing the thrust axis . amongst these are the invariant squared jet - mass @xcite and the jet - broadening variables @xcite , defined respectively as @xmath17 where the plane perpendicular to the thrust axis is used to separate the event into left and right hemisphere , @xmath18 and @xmath19 . given these definitions one can study the heavy - jet mass , @xmath20 and wide - jet broadening , @xmath21 ; analogously one defines the light - jet mass ( @xmath22 ) and narrow - jet broadening @xmath23 ; finally one defines also the sum of jet masses @xmath24 and the total jet broadening @xmath25 and their differences @xmath26 , and @xmath27 . like @xmath14 , all these variables ( and those that follow ) vanish in the two - jet limit ; @xmath22 and @xmath23 are special in that they also vanish in the limit of three narrow jets ( three final - state partons ; or in general for events with any number of jets in the heavy hemisphere , but only one in the light hemisphere ) . another set of observables @xcite making use of the thrust axis starts with the thrust major @xmath28 , @xmath29 where the maximisation is performed over all directions of the unit vector @xmath30 , such that @xmath31 . the thrust minor , @xmath32 , is given by @xmath33 and is sometimes also known @xcite as the ( normalised ) out - of - plane momentum @xmath34 . like @xmath22 and @xmath23 , it vanishes in the three - jet limit ( and , in general , for planar events ) . finally from @xmath28 and @xmath32 one constructs the oblateness , @xmath35 . an alternative axis is used for the spherocity @xmath36 @xcite , @xmath37 while there exist reliable ( though algorithmically slow ) methods of determining the thrust and thrust minor axes , the general properties of the spherocity axis are less well understood and consequently the spherocity has received less theoretical attention . an observable similar to the thrust minor ( in that it measures out - of - plane momentum ) , but defined in a manner analogous to the spherocity is the acoplanarity @xcite , which minimises a ( squared ) projection perpendicular to a plane . it is also possible to define event shapes without reference to an explicit axis . the best known examples are the @xmath38 and @xmath39 parameters @xcite which are obtained from the momentum tensor @xcite . because of the quadratic dependence on particle momenta , these observable are collinear unsafe and so no longer widely studied . ] @xmath40 where @xmath41 is the @xmath42 component of the three vector @xmath43 . in terms of the eigenvalues @xmath44 , @xmath45 and @xmath46 of @xmath47 , the @xmath38 and @xmath39 parameters are given by @xmath48 the @xmath38-parameter is related also to one of a series of fox - wolfram observables @xcite , @xmath49 , and is sometimes equivalently written as @xmath50 the @xmath39-parameter , like the thrust minor , vanishes for all final - states with up to 3 particles , and in general , for planar events . the @xmath38-parameter can actually be considered ( in the limit of all particles being massless ) as the integral of a more differential observable , the energy - energy correlation ( eec ) @xcite , @xmath51 where the average in eq . ( [ eq : sigmachi ] ) is carried out over all events . another set of variables that characterise the shape of the final state are the @xmath52-jet resolution parameters that are generated by jet finding algorithms . examples of these are the jade @xcite and durham @xcite jet clustering algorithms . one introduces distance measures @xmath53 @xmath54 for each pair of particles @xmath55 and @xmath56 . the pair with the smallest @xmath53 is clustered ( by adding the four - momenta the @xmath57 recombination scheme ) and replaced with a single pseudo - particle ; the @xmath53 are recalculated and the combination procedure repeated until all remaining @xmath53 are larger than some value @xmath58 . the event - shapes based on these jet algorithms are @xmath59 , defined as the maximum value of @xmath58 for which the event is clustered to 3 jets ; analogously one can define @xmath60 , and so forth . other clustering jet algorithms exist . most differ essentially in the definition of the distance measure @xmath53 and the recombination procedure . for example , there are e0 , p and p0 variants @xcite of the jade algorithm , which differ in the details of the treatment of the difference between energy and the modulus of the 3-momentum . the geneva algorithm @xcite is like the jade algorithm except that in the definition of the @xmath53 it is @xmath61 that appears in the denominator instead of the total energy . an algorithm that has been developed and adopted recently is the cambridge algorithm @xcite , which uses the same distance measure as the durham algorithm , but with a different clustering sequence . we note that a number of variants of the above observables have recently been introduced @xcite , which differ in their treatment of massive particles . these include the @xmath62-scheme where all occurrences of @xmath11 are replaced by @xmath63 and the @xmath57-scheme where each 3-momentum @xmath43 is rescaled by @xmath64 . the former leads to a difference between the total energy in the initial and final states , while the latter leads to a final - state with potentially non - zero overall @xmath65-momentum . while such schemes do have these small drawbacks , for certain observables , notably the jet masses , which are quite sensitive to the masses of the hadrons ( seldom identified in experimental event - shape studies ) , they tend to be both theoretically and experimentally cleaner . ref . @xcite also introduced a ` decay ' scheme ( an alternative is given in @xcite ) where all hadrons are artificially decayed to massless particles . since a decay is by definition a stochastic process , this does not give a unique result on an event - by - event basis , but should rather be understood as providing a correction factor which is to be averaged over a large ensemble of events . it is to be kept in mind that these different schemes all lead to identical perturbative predictions ( with massless quarks ) and differ only at the non - perturbative level . a final question relating to event - shape definitions concerns the hadron level at which measurements are made . since shorter lived hadrons decay during the time of flight , one has to specify whether measurements were made at a stage before or after a given species of hadron decays . it is important therefore when experimental results are quoted , that they should specify which particles have been taken to be stable and which have not . as well as the @xmath66 variables discussed above , it is also possible to define , by analogy , event shapes in dis . the frame in which dis event shapes can be made to most closely resemble those of @xmath66 is the breit frame @xcite . this is the frame in which @xmath67 , where @xmath68 is the incoming proton momentum and @xmath69 the virtual photon momentum . one defines two hemispheres , separated by the plane normal to the photon direction : the remnant hemisphere ( @xmath70 , containing the proton remnant ) , and the current hemisphere ( @xmath71 ) . at the level of the quark - parton model , @xmath71 is like one hemisphere of @xmath0 and it is therefore natural to define event shapes using only the momenta in this hemisphere . in contrast , any observable involving momenta in the remnant hemisphere must take care to limit its sensitivity to the proton remnant , whose fragmentation can not be reliably handled within perturbation theory . a possible alternative to studying just the current hemisphere , is to take all particles except those in a small cone around the proton direction @xcite . a feature that arises in dis is that there are two natural choices of axis . for example , for the thrust @xmath72 one can either choose the unit vector @xmath73 to be the photon ( @xmath74 ) axis , @xmath75 , or one can choose it to be the true thrust axis , that which maximises the sum , giving @xmath76 . similarly one defines two variants of the jet broadening , @xmath77 for the jet - mass and @xmath38-parameter the choice of axis does not enter into the definitions and we have @xmath78 all the above observables can also be defined with an alternative normalisation , @xmath79 replacing @xmath80 , in which case they are named @xmath81 and so on . we note that @xmath81 was originally proposed in @xcite . for a reader used to @xmath0 event shapes the two normalisations might at first sight seem equivalent however when considering a single hemisphere , as in dis , the equivalence is lost , and indeed there are even events in which the current hemisphere is empty . this is a problem for observables normalised to the sum of energies in @xmath71 , to the extent that to ensure infrared safety it is necessary to exclude all events in which the energy present in the current hemisphere is smaller than some not too small fraction of @xmath82 ( see for example @xcite ) . additionally there are studies of variables that vanish in the 2 + 1-parton limit for dis , in particular the @xmath34 defined in analogy with the thrust minor of @xmath0 , with the thrust axis replaced by the photon axis @xcite , or an azimuthal correlation observable @xcite . rather than being examined just in @xmath71 , these observables use particles also in the remnant hemisphere ( for @xmath34 , all except those in a small cone around the proton ) . as in @xmath0 , jet rates are studied also in dis . unlike the event - shapes described above , the jet - shapes make use of the momenta in both hemispheres of the breit frame . their definitions are quite similar to those of @xmath0 except that a clustering to the proton remnant ( beam jet ) is also included @xcite . though only @xmath0 and dis are within the scope of this review , we take the opportunity here to note that related observables are being considered also for other processes . notably for drell - yan production an out - of - plane momentum measurement has been proposed in @xcite and various thrust and thrust - minor type observables have been considered in hadron - hadron dijet production in @xcite . the observables discussed above are all infrared and collinear safe they do not change their value when an extra soft gluon is added or if a parton is split into two collinear partons . as emerges from the original discussion of sterman and weinberg @xcite , this is a necessary condition for the cancellation of real and virtual divergences associated with such emissions , and therefore for making finite perturbative predictions . for an event shape that vanishes in the @xmath52-jet limit ( which we shall generically refer as an @xmath52-jet observable ) , the leading perturbative contribution is of order @xmath83 . for example the thrust distribution in @xmath0 is given by @xmath84 + { { \cal o}\left({\alpha_s}^2\right ) } \nonumber\end{aligned}\ ] ] ( see e.g. @xcite ) . when calculating perturbative predictions for mean values of event shapes , as well as higher moments of their distributions , one has integrals of the form @xmath85 we note that in general , fixed - order event - shape distributions diverge in the limit as @xmath86 goes to @xmath87 , cf . ( [ eq : thrustdist ] ) for @xmath88 . in eq . ( [ eq : meanv ] ) , the weighting with a power of @xmath86 is sufficient to render the singularity integrable , and the integral is dominated by large @xmath86 ( and so large transverse momenta of order @xmath82 , the hard scale ) . this dominance of a single scale ensures that the coefficients in the perturbative expansion for @xmath89 are well - behaved ( for example they are free of any enhancements associated with logarithms of ratios of disparate scales ) . beyond leading order , perturbative calculations involve complex cancellations between soft and collinear real and virtual contributions and are nearly always left to general - purpose `` fixed - order monte carlo '' programs . the current state of the art is next - to - leading order ( nlo ) , and available programs include : for @xmath0 to 3 jets , event @xcite , eerad @xcite and event2 @xcite ; for @xmath0 to 4 jets , menlo parc @xcite , mercutio @xcite and eerad2 @xcite ; for dis to @xmath90 jets , mepjet @xcite , disent @xcite and disaster++ @xcite ; and for all the above processes and additionally dis to @xmath91 jets and various hadron - hadron and photo - production processes , nlojet++ @xcite ( for photo - production , there is additionally jetvip @xcite ) . in recent years much progress has been made towards nnlo calculations , though complete results remain to be obtained ( for a review of the current situation , see @xcite ) . for the event shape distributions themselves , however , fixed order perturbative estimates are only of use away from the @xmath92 region , due to the singular behaviour of the fixed order coefficients in the @xmath93 limit . in this limit , at higher orders each power of @xmath94 is accompanied by a coefficient which grows as @xmath95 . these problems arise because when @xmath86 is small one places a restriction on real emissions without any corresponding restriction on virtual contributions the resulting incompleteness of cancellations between logarithmically divergent real and virtual contributions is the origin of the order - by - order logarithmic enhancement of the perturbative contributions . to obtain a meaningful answer it is therefore necessary to perform an all - orders _ resummation _ of logarithmically enhanced terms . when discussing resummations it is convenient to refer to the integrated distribution , @xmath96 quite generally @xmath97 has a perturbative expansion of the form @xmath98 one convention is to refer to all terms @xmath99 as leading logarithms ( ll ) , terms @xmath100 as next - to - leading logarithms ( nll ) , etc . , and within this hierarchy a resummation may account for all ll terms , or all ll and nll terms and so forth . such a resummation gives a convergent answer up to values of @xmath101 , beyond which terms that are formally subleading can become as important as the leading terms ( for example if @xmath102 , then the nnll term @xmath103 is of the same order as the ll term @xmath104 ) . at its limit of validity , @xmath105 , a n@xmath106ll resummation neglects terms of relative accuracy @xmath107 . an important point though is that for nearly all observables that have been resummed there exists a property of exponentiation : @xmath108 in some cases @xmath109 is written in terms of a sum of such exponentiated contributions ; in certain other cases the exponentiation holds only for a suitable integral ( e.g. fourier ) transform of the observable . the fundamental point of exponentiation is that the inner sum , over @xmath110 , now runs only up to @xmath111 , instead of @xmath112 as was the case in eq . ( [ eq : dumbsum ] ) . with the exponentiated form for the resummation , the nomenclature `` ( next - to)-leading - logarithmic '' acquires a different meaning n@xmath106ll now refers to all terms in the exponent @xmath113 . to distinguish the two classification schemes we refer to them as n@xmath106ll@xmath114 and n@xmath106ll@xmath115 . the crucial difference between n@xmath106ll@xmath114 and n@xmath106ll@xmath115 resummations lies in the range of validity and their accuracy . a n@xmath106ll@xmath115 resummation remains convergent considerably further in @xmath116 , up to @xmath102 ( corresponding usually to the peak of the distribution @xmath117 ) ; at this limit , neglected terms are of relative order @xmath118 . consequently a n@xmath106ll@xmath115 resummation includes not only all n@xmath106ll@xmath114 terms , but also considerably more . from now when we use the term n@xmath106ll it should be taken to mean n@xmath106ll@xmath119 . two main ingredients are involved in the resummations as shown in eq . ( [ eq : expresum ] ) . firstly one needs to find a way of writing the observable as a factorised expression of terms for individual emissions . this is often achieved with the aid of one or more integral ( mellin , fourier ) transforms . secondly one approximates the multi - emission matrix element as a product of individual independent emission factors . it is to be kept in mind that not all observables exponentiate . the jade jet resolution is the best known such example @xcite ( and it has not yet been resummed ) . the general criteria for exponentiation are discussed in @xcite . resummed results to nll accuracy exist for a number of @xmath16-jet observables in @xmath120 jets : the thrust @xcite , the heavy - jet mass @xcite and the single - jet and light - jet masses @xcite , jet broadenings @xcite , @xmath38-parameter @xcite , durham and cambridge jet resolutions @xcite , the thrust major and oblateness @xcite , eec @xcite and event - shape / energy - flow correlations @xcite ; for @xmath65-jet observables in @xmath121 jet events we have the thrust minor @xcite and the @xmath39-parameter @xcite . for dis to @xmath122 jets the current - hemisphere observables are resummed in refs . @xcite and the jet rates in @xcite ( though only to nll@xmath114 accuracy ) while the @xmath90 jet observables , @xmath34 and azimuthal correlations , have been resummed in @xcite . methods for automated resummation of arbitrary observables are currently in development for a range of processes@xcite , and techniques have also being developed for dealing with arbitrary processes @xcite . we also note that for the @xmath0 thrust and heavy - jet mass there have been investigations of certain classes of corrections beyond nll accuracy @xcite . the above resummations all apply to events with only light quarks . investigations to nll@xmath123 accuracy have also been performed for @xmath0 jet rates with heavy quarks @xcite . the above resummations are all for @xmath52-jet observables in the @xmath52-jet limit . for some @xmath65-jet observables it is useful to have resummations in the @xmath16-jet limit ( because it is here that most of the data lie ) , though currently little attention has been devoted to such resummations , with just nll@xmath123 results for jet - resolution parameters @xcite and nll@xmath115 results for the light - jet mass and narrow - jet broadening @xcite . furthermore in addition to the resummation of the @xmath38-parameter for @xmath124 there exists a ll resummation @xcite ( that could straightforward be extended to nll ) of a ` shoulder ' structure at @xmath125 ( related to a step function at lo ) , which corresponds to symmetric three jet events . some of the observables ( for example many single - jet observables ) have the property that they are sensitive to emissions only in some of the phase space . these are referred to as non - global observables and nll resummed predictions for them require that one account for coherent ensembles of energy - ordered large - angle gluons . this has so far been done only in the large-@xmath126 limit @xcite ( for reviews see @xcite ) , though progress is being made in extending this to finite @xmath126 @xcite . at @xmath127 . the resummed distribution has been matched ( @xmath128 scheme , see below ) so as to include the full lo and nlo contributions . the inset differs from the main plot only in the scales.,scaledwidth=60.0% ] to illustrate the impact of resummations we show in figure [ fig : thrlonlo ] the lo , nlo and resummed results for the thrust distribution . not only is the divergence in the lo distribution clearly visible , but one also observes a marked difference in the qualitative behaviour of the lo and nlo results , both of which show large differences relative to the nll resummed prediction at small @xmath14 . for the practical use of resummed results an important step is that of matching with the fixed - order prediction . at the simplest level one may think of matching as simply adding the fixed - order and resummed predictions while subtracting out the doubly counted ( logarithmic ) terms . such a procedure is however too naive in that the fixed - order contribution generally contains terms that are subleading with respect to the terms included in the resummation , but which still diverge . for example when matching nll and nlo calculations , one finds that the nlo result has a term @xmath129 , which in the distribution diverges as @xmath130 . this is unphysical and the matching procedure must be sufficiently sophisticated so as to avoid this problem , and in fact it should nearly always ensure that the matched distribution goes to zero for @xmath131 . several procedures exist , such as @xmath128 and @xmath109 matching @xcite and multiplicative matching @xcite and they differ from one - another only in terms that are nnlo and nnll , i.e. formally beyond the state - of - the - art accuracy . we note the matching generally ensures that the resummation , in addition to being correct at nll accuracy ( our shorthand for nll@xmath115 ) , is also correct at nnll@xmath123 accuracy . matching also involves certain other subtleties , for example the ` modification of the logarithm ' , whereby @xmath132 is replaced with @xmath133 , where @xmath134 is the largest kinematically allowed value for the observable . this ensures that the logarithms go to zero at @xmath134 , rather than at some arbitrary point ( usually @xmath135 ) , which is necessary in order for the resulting matched distribution to vanish at @xmath134 . [ sec : means ] [ sec : meanpc ] much of the interest in event shapes stems from the wealth of data that is available , covering a large range of centre of mass energies ( @xmath0 ) or photon virtualities ( dis ) . the @xmath0 data comes from the pre - lep experiments @xcite , the four lep experiments @xcite @xcite @xcite and sld @xcite . in addition , because many observables have been proposed only in the last ten or so years and owing to the particular interest ( see below ) in data at moderate centre of mass energies , the jade data have been re - analysed @xcite . have also been obtained from lep 1 @xcite by considering events with an isolated hard final - state photon and treating them as if they were pure qcd events whose centre of mass energy is that of the recoiling hadronic system . such a procedure is untrustworthy because it assumes that one can factorise the gluon production from the photon production . this is only the case when there is strong ordering in transverse momenta between the photon and gluon , and is not therefore applicable when both the photon and the gluon are hard . tests with monte carlo event generators which may indicate that any ` non - factorisation ' is small @xcite are not reliable , because the event generator used almost certainly does not contain the full 1-photon , 1-gluon matrix element . it is also to be noted that the isolation cuts on the photon will bias the distribution of the event shapes , in some cases @xcite similarly to an event - shape energy - flow correlation @xcite . therefore we would argue that before relying on these data , one should at the very least compare the factorisation approximation with exact lo calculations , which can be straightforwardly obtained using packages such as grace @xcite , comphep @xcite or amegic++ @xcite . ] results in dis come from both h1 @xcite ( mean values and distributions ) and zeus @xcite ( means ) , @xcite ( means and distributions in rapidity gap events ) . thrust , compared to lo , nlo and nlo+@xmath136 ; right : data for the durham jet resolution @xmath137 compared to the nlo prediction ( figure taken from @xcite).,title="fig:",scaledwidth=48.0% ] thrust , compared to lo , nlo and nlo+@xmath136 ; right : data for the durham jet resolution @xmath137 compared to the nlo prediction ( figure taken from @xcite).,title="fig:",scaledwidth=48.0% ] let us start our discussion of the data by examining mean values ( distributions are left until section [ sec : distributions ] ) . as we have already mentioned , one of the most appealing properties of event shapes , in terms of testing qcd , is the fact that they are calculable in perturbation theory and so provide a direct method for the extraction of @xmath1 as well as testing other parameters of the theory such as the colour factors @xmath138 and @xmath139 by using a wealth of available experimental data . however one obstruction to the clean extraction of these fundamental parameters is the presence in many cases , of significant non - perturbative effects that typically fall as inverse powers @xmath140 of @xmath82 , the hard scale in the reaction ( the centre - of mass energy in @xmath5 annihilation and the momentum transfer in dis ) . the importance of such _ power corrections _ varies from observable to observable . for example , it can be seen from fig . [ fig : meandata ] ( left ) that the data for the mean value of the thrust variable need a significant component @xmath141 in addition to the lo and nlo fixed order perturbative estimates , in order to be described . on the other hand the comparison ( right ) for the mean value of the durham jet resolution parameter @xmath137 with the nlo prediction alone is satisfactory , without the need for any substantial power correction term . the problem of non - perturbative corrections is so fundamental in event - shape studies that it is worthwhile giving a brief overview of the main approaches that are used . no statement can be made with standard perturbative methods about the size of these power corrections and hence the earliest methods adopted to quantify them were phenomenological hadronisation models embedded in monte carlo event generators @xcite . one of the main issues involved in using such hadronisation models is the existence of several adjustable parameters . this essentially means that a satisfactory description of data can be obtained by tuning the parameters , which does not allow much insight into the physical origin of such power behaved terms which are themselves of intrinsic theoretical interest ( for a more detailed critique of hadronisation models see @xcite ) . however since the mid - nineties there have been developments that have had a significant impact on the theoretical understanding of power corrections . perhaps the most popular method of estimating power corrections is based on the renormalon model . in this approach one examines high - order terms @xmath142 of the perturbative series that are enhanced by coefficients @xmath143 , where @xmath144 is the first coefficient of the @xmath145 function . the factorial divergence leads to an ambiguity in the sum of the series of order @xmath2 , where the value of @xmath62 depends on the speed with which the high - order terms diverge . this approach has seen far more applications than can possibly be described here and for a full discussion and further references on renormalons the reader is referred to @xcite . the most extensive phenomenological applications of renormalon based ideas have been in the estimation of power corrections for event - shape variables . the reason is that event shapes have much larger ( and so experimentally more visible ) power corrections ( typically @xmath146 ) than most other observables ( typically @xmath147 or smaller ) . for event shape variables in @xmath5 annihilation in the two - jet limit , renormalon - inspired ( or related ) studies of power corrections have been carried out in refs . for the @xmath122 jet limit of dis , results on power corrections based on the renormalon approach can be found in @xcite . studies in the @xmath65-jet limit have been given in @xcite . the approach that has been most commonly used in comparing theoretical predictions with experimental data is that initiated by dokshitzer and webber @xcite . here the full result for the mean value , @xmath148 , is given by @xmath149 where @xmath150 is the perturbative prediction for the mean value . the hadronisation correction is included through the term @xmath151 , where @xmath62 is related to the speed of divergence of the renormalon series ( as discussed above ) , @xmath152 is an observable - dependent ( calculable ) coefficient and @xmath153 is a non - perturbative factor , scaling as @xmath154 which is hypothesised to be common across a whole class of observables with the same value of @xmath62 ( strictly speaking the full story is a little more complicated , see e.g. @xcite ) . most event shapes have @xmath3 , implying a leading power correction scaling as @xmath146 , essentially a consequence of the observables linearity on soft momenta . for these observables with @xmath3 the form for @xmath155 that has become standard is @xcite , @xmath156 where @xmath157 , @xmath158 and @xmath159 . in eq . ( [ eq : cpfin ] ) an arbitrary _ infrared matching scale _ @xmath160 has been introduced , intended to separate the perturbative and non - perturbative regions . it is usually taken to be @xmath16 gev ( and for systematic error estimates it is varied between @xmath161 and @xmath65 gev ) . the only truly non - perturbative ingredient in eq . ( [ eq : cpfin ] ) is @xmath162 , which can be interpreted as the average value of an infrared finite strong coupling for scales below @xmath160 ( such a concept was first applied phenomenologically in @xcite ) . though one could imagine estimating it from lattice studies of the coupling ( such as @xcite ) , one should keep in mind that the coupling in the infrared is not a uniquely defined quantity . in practice the phenomenological test of the renormalon approach will be that @xmath163 has a consistent value across all observables ( in the @xmath3 class ) . the terms with negative sign in the parenthesis in eq . ( [ eq : cpfin ] ) are a consequence of merging standard nlo perturbative results , which include the small spurious contributions from the infrared region ( scales up to @xmath160 ) , with the non - perturbative power correction that accounts correctly for scales from zero to @xmath160 . carrying out the subtraction of the perturbative terms that arise from the infrared region , below @xmath160 , amounts to inclusion of the negative sign terms in parenthesis above . note that this subtraction procedure must be carried out to the level of accuracy of the corresponding perturbative estimate . in other words if a perturbative estimate becomes available at @xmath164 then an additional subtraction term proportional to @xmath165 is required . with the subtraction procedure carried out to @xmath166 , as above , one expects a residual @xmath160 dependence @xmath167 . the scale @xmath168 is the renormalisation scale , which should be taken of the same order as the hard scale @xmath82 . the ` milan factor ' , @xmath169 in eq . ( [ eq : cpfin ] ) , is @xcite @xmath170 where the numerical result is given for @xmath171 , since only light flavours will be active at the relevant ( low ) scales . it accounts for the fact that the usual , ` naive ' , calculation for @xmath152 is carried out on the basis of a decaying virtual gluon ( i.e. cutting a bubble in the chain of vacuum polarisation insertions that lead to the running of the coupling ) , but without fully accounting for the non - inclusiveness of that decay when dealing with the observable . it was pointed out in @xcite that this is inconsistent and full ( two - loop ) calculations revealed @xcite that if the ` naive ' @xmath152 coefficient is calculated in an appropriate scheme , then the factor @xmath169 comes out to be universal . as discussed in @xcite this is essentially a consequence of the fact that regardless of whether one accounts for the virtual gluon decay , the distribution of ` non - perturbative ' transverse momentum is independent of rapidity ( the ` tube - model ' of @xcite , based essentially on boost invariance ) . while the factor @xmath169 corrects the @xmath152 at two - loop level , the question of even higher order corrections is still open , although one can argue that such effects will be suppressed by a factor @xmath172 relative to the leading power correction . this argument relies on the hope that the strong coupling remains moderate even in the infrared region . .coefficients of @xmath4 power corrections for @xmath5 event shapes ; @xmath173 . [ cols="^,^,^,^,^,^,^",options="header " , ] tables 1 and 2 display the values of the @xmath152 coefficients obtained in the 2-jet @xmath5 and and @xmath122-jet dis cases respectively . note the different behaviour , proportional to @xmath174 , that arises in the case of the jet broadenings in both processes , a consequence of the fact that the broadening is more sensitive to recoil induced by perturbative radiation @xcite . the improved theoretical understanding that led to this prediction was strongly stimulated by experimental analysis @xcite of features of earlier predictions @xcite that were inconsistent with the data . since the origin of the @xmath174 enhancement is a perturbative , non - perturbative interplay best explained with reference to the power correction for the distribution , we delay its discussion to section [ sec : anldist ] . another consequence of this interplay of the broadening power correction with perturbative radiation is the fact that the dis broadening @xmath175 has a bjorken @xmath176 dependent term corresponding to dglap evolution of the parton densities , as indicated by the term proportional to @xmath177 @xcite , where @xmath178 denotes a parton density function . the coefficients for the other dis variables are @xmath176 independent since in those cases the power correction arises from soft emission alone . we also mention the result for the power correction to another interesting variable , the energy - energy correlation ( eec ) , in the back - to - back region . like the broadening this variable exhibits the impact of perturbative - non perturbative interplay . the results are fractional power corrections that vary as @xmath179 ( for the quark - gluon correlation ) and @xmath180 for the hard quark - antiquark correlation @xcite , instead of @xmath4 and @xmath181 contributions respectively , that would be obtained by considering np emission without the presence of harder perturbative emissions . observables for which the power corrections have yet to be understood include the jet resolution parameters . renormalon based predictions were given in @xcite suggesting a @xmath146 correction for @xmath182 and @xmath147 for @xmath183 . however it seems that in both cases there could be significant perturbative non - perturbative interplay which will complicate the picture . nevertheless , as we have seen in fig . [ fig : meandata ] ( right ) any correction to @xmath184 is certainly small compared to that for other observables . a general point to be kept in mind is that the universality of @xmath163 can be broken by contributions of order @xmath185 , where @xmath186 is the mass scale for hadrons @xcite . whether this happens or not depends on the hadron mass scheme in which the observable is defined ( cf . section [ sec : definitions ] ) . most observables are implicitly in the @xmath62-scheme , which generally involves a small negative breaking of universality ( which is almost observable - independent , so that an illusion of universality will persist ) . the jet masses are an exception and in their usual definitions they have a significant ( positive ) universality breaking component . the @xmath57-scheme is free of universality breaking terms , as is the decay scheme ( since hadron masses are zero ) . we also note that the power correction associated with hadron mass effects is enhanced by an anomalous dimension , @xmath187 with @xmath188 . the normal ` renormalon ' power correction would also be expected to have an anomalous dimension , but it has yet to be calculated . as well as studies of mean values ( first moments ) of observables there has also been work on higher - moments , @xmath189 with @xmath190 . simple renormalon - inspired arguments suggest that the @xmath191 moments of event shapes should have as their leading power correction at most a @xmath192 contribution ( essentially since @xmath193 vanishes at @xmath194 for small @xmath195 ) . however as was pointed out by webber @xcite , the fact ( to be discussed in section [ sec : anldist ] ) that the @xmath146 power correction essentially corresponds to a shift of the distribution ( for @xmath6 , @xmath38 and @xmath196 , but not for the broadenings ) , means that to a first approximation we will have @xmath197 given that @xmath198 is of order @xmath94 , all higher moments of event shapes will receive power corrections of order @xmath199 , which is parametrically larger than @xmath192 . strictly speaking it is not possible to guarantee the coefficient of @xmath199 given in eq . ( [ eq : momentpc ] ) , since the shift approximation on which it is based holds only in the @xmath16-jet region , whereas the dominant contribution to the relevant integral comes from the @xmath65-jet region . for the @xmath38-parameter an alternative coefficient for the @xmath199 power correction has been proposed in @xcite , however since it also is not based on a full calculation of the power correction in the three - jet region ( which does not yet exist ) , it is subject to precisely the same reservations as eq . ( [ eq : momentpc ] ) . we note also an interesting result by gardi @xcite regarding the exact renormalon analysis of @xmath200 . while it is clear that the physical answer @xmath199 will not appear in a leading renormalon analysis ( the extra factor of @xmath94 means that it is associated with a subleading renormalon ) the calculation @xcite has the surprising result that the leading renormalon contribution is not @xmath147 as naively expected but rather @xmath201 . considerable progress has been made in recent years in the calculation of power corrections for three - jet observables ( those that vanish in the two and the three - jet limits ) . in the three - jet limit , there exist explicit results for the thrust minor @xcite and the @xmath39-parameter @xcite in @xmath202 , the out of plane momentum in drell - yan plus jet @xcite and in @xmath90-jet dis @xcite , as well as azimuthal correlations in dis @xcite . except for the @xmath39-parameter , all these calculations involve perturbative , non - perturbative interplay in a manner similar to that of the broadenings and back - to - back eec . the explicit forms for the results are rather complicated and so we refer the reader to the original publications . simpler ( though numerical ) results have been obtained @xcite in the case of the @xmath39-parameter ( confirmed also by @xcite ) integrated over all 3-jet configurations , where one finds @xmath203 the power of @xmath94 comes from the matrix - element weighting of the @xmath65-jet configurations and the fact that the @xmath39-parameter vanishes in the @xmath16-jet limit . a final @xmath65-jet result of interest @xcite is that for the @xmath38-parameter just above the sudakov shoulder , at @xmath125 . this is the only case where a proper calculation exists for the power correction to a two - jet observable in the three jet limit : @xmath204 this is slightly less than half the correction that appears in the two - jet limit ( @xmath205 ) . a point that emerges clearly from eqs . ( [ eq : dpower ] ) and ( [ eq : c34power ] ) , but that is relevant for all @xmath65-jet studies is that the power correction acquires a dependence on @xmath139 , i.e. there is sensitivity to hadronisation from a gluon . in situations where one selects only three - jet events there is additionally non trivial dependence on the geometry , due to the coherence between the three jets . comparisons to data for such observables would therefore allow a powerful test of the renormalon - inspired picture . in particular , other models , such as the flux tube model @xcite ( based essentially on boost invariance along the @xmath206 axis ) , which in the @xmath16-jet limit give the same predictions as renormalon - inspired approaches , can not as naturally be extended to the @xmath65-jet case . one of the most widespread ways of testing the dokshitzer - webber approach to hadronisation is to carry out simultaneous fits to the mean value data for @xmath1 and @xmath163 . figure [ fig : meandata ] , where the term labelled @xmath4 is actually of the form @xmath207 , shows the good agreement that is obtained with the thrust data . the quality of agreement is similar for other observables ( see for example fig . 11 of @xcite ) . the true test of the approach however lies in a verification of the universality hypothesis , namely that @xmath163 is the same for all observables and processes . , one may wonder why one also fits for @xmath1 . the two principal reasons are ( a ) that one is in any case interested in the value of @xmath94 and ( b ) that the data and perturbative prediction differ also by higher - order terms in @xmath94 and fixing @xmath94 would mean trying to fit these higher - order terms with a power correction , which would be misleading . ] while there are strong general reasons for expecting universality within @xmath0 ( boost invariance and the flux - tube model ) , universality across difference processes is less trivial for example one could imagine dis hadronisation being modified by interactions between outgoing low - momentum gluons ( or hadrons ) and the ` cloud ' of partons that make up the proton remnant ( present even for a fast - moving proton , since the longitudinal size of the cloud is always of order @xmath208 ) . figure [ fig : meanfits ] shows @xmath161-@xmath209 contours for fits of @xmath1 and @xmath163 in @xmath0 @xcite ( left , all experiments combined ) and dis ( right , h1 @xcite and zeus @xcite merged into one plot ) . aside from the different scales used , some care is required in reading the figures because of different treatments of the errors in the different plots . for example h1 include experimental systematic errors whereas zeus do not . in the @xmath0 fit , the systematics are included but treated as uncorrelated , which may underestimate the final error . in neither figure are theoretical uncertainties included : over the available range of @xmath0 energies , renormalisation scale dependence gives an uncertainty of about @xmath210 on @xmath94 , while a ` canonical ' variation of the milan factor @xmath211 by @xmath212 ( to allow for higher - order terms ) leads to an uncertainty of @xmath213 on @xmath163 @xcite . in dis the corresponding uncertainties are larger for @xmath94 ( @xmath214 , essentially because the fits are dominated by lower @xmath82 values , and they vary substantially for @xmath163 ( larger for photon - axis observables , smaller for the others ) . also to be kept in mind is that the dis figure includes the jet mass , @xmath215 in the default scheme , and in @xmath0 the origins of the arrows indicate the default - scheme results for @xmath216 and @xmath196 . since the default scheme for jet masses breaks universality ( cf . section [ sec : dwdetails ] ) these results should not be compared directly to those for other observables . , @xmath163 fit to @xmath0 data on mean values of event shapes , with the jet masses converted to the @xmath62-scheme ( the arrow indicates the change in going from default to @xmath62-scheme ) @xcite . right : fits to dis mean event - shape data by h1 @xcite and zeus @xcite ( curves taken from figures in @xcite ) . contours indicate 1-@xmath209 uncertainties ( statistical and experimental systematic , except for the zeus results which are just statistical).,title="fig:",scaledwidth=48.0% ] , @xmath163 fit to @xmath0 data on mean values of event shapes , with the jet masses converted to the @xmath62-scheme ( the arrow indicates the change in going from default to @xmath62-scheme ) @xcite . right : fits to dis mean event - shape data by h1 @xcite and zeus @xcite ( curves taken from figures in @xcite ) . contours indicate 1-@xmath209 uncertainties ( statistical and experimental systematic , except for the zeus results which are just statistical).,title="fig:",scaledwidth=48.0% ] taking into account the uncertainties , which are not necessarily correlated from one observable to another , fig . [ fig : meanfits ] indicates remarkable success for the renormalon - inspired picture . the results are in general consistent with a universal value for @xmath163 in the range @xmath217 to @xmath218 . furthermore the @xmath0 results for @xmath94 are in good agreement with the world average . on the other hand the dis results for @xmath94 seem to be somewhat larger than the world average . the discrepancy is ( just ) within the theoretical systematic errors , however it remains a little disturbing and one wonders whether it could be indicative of large higher - order corrections , or some other problem ( known issues include the fact that the low-@xmath82 data can bias the fits , for example because of heavy - quark effects and @xmath219 corrections ; and also at high-@xmath82 there is @xmath220 interference which is not usually accounted for in the fixed - order calculations ) . there is potentially also some worry about the @xmath221 result which has an anomalously low @xmath163 and large @xmath94 ( and additionally shows unexpectedly substantial @xmath176 dependence @xcite ) . another point relates to the default scheme jet masses though the universality - breaking effects should be purely non - perturbative , they have an effect also on the fit results for @xmath1 . this is a consequence of the anomalous dimension that accompanies @xmath146 hadron mass effects . similar variations of @xmath94 are seen when varying the set of particles that are considered stable @xcite . though as discussed above some issues remain , they should not however be seen as detracting significantly from the overall success of the approach and the general consistency between @xmath0 and dis . we also note that the first moment of the coupling as extracted from studies of heavy - quark fragmentation @xcite is quite similar to the value found for event shapes . there have also been experimental measurements of higher moments of event shapes , notably in @xcite . the parameters @xmath1 and @xmath163 are fixed from fits to mean values and then inserted into eq . ( [ eq : momentpc ] ) to get a prediction for the second moments . for @xmath222 this gives very good agreement with the data ( though the fact that @xmath196 is in the default scheme perhaps complicates the situation ) , while @xmath223 and @xmath224 show a need for a substantial extra correction . in @xcite this extra contribution is shown to be compatible with a @xmath219 term , though it would be interesting to see if it is also compatible with a @xmath225 term with a modified coefficient . currently ( to our knowledge ) no fits have been performed for three - jet event shapes , though we understand that such fits are in progress @xcite for the mean value of the @xmath39-parameter . we look forward eagerly to the results . in the meantime it is possible to verify standard parameters for @xmath94 and @xmath163 against a single published point at @xmath127 @xcite and one finds reasonable agreement within the uncertainties . two other points of view that have also been used in analysing data on @xmath5 event shapes are the approach of _ dressed gluons _ employed by gardi and grunberg @xcite and the use of _ renormalisation group improved _ perturbation theory @xcite as carried out by the delphi collaboration @xcite . in the gardi - grunberg approach one uses the basic concept of renormalons ( on which the dw model is also based ) , but one choses to treat the renormalon integral differently to the dw model . this renormalon integral is ill - defined due to the landau singularity in the running coupling and instead of assuming an infrared finite coupling below some matching scale @xmath160 as was the case in the dw model , gardi and grunberg define the renormalon integral by its principal value ( a discussion of the theoretical merits of different approaches has been give in @xcite ) . in doing this they explicitly include higher order renormalon contributions in their perturbative result , rather than including them via power behaved corrections below scale @xmath160 that result from assuming an infrared finite coupling ( though they do also compare to something similar , which they call a ` cutoff ' approach ) . however since one is dealing with an ambiguous integral ( a prescription other than a principal value one would give a result differing by an amount proportional to a power correction ) one must still allow for a power correction term . gardi and grunberg studied the mean thrust in @xmath5 annihilation and used the following form for fitting to the data : @xmath226+\frac{\lambda}{q}\ ] ] where the subscript pv denotes the principal value of the renormalon integral @xmath227 for the thrust ( which includes the full lo contribution and parts of the higher - order contributions ) and @xmath228 is a piece that accounts for the difference between the true nlo coefficient for @xmath14 and the contribution included in @xmath227 . the best fit values obtained for @xmath229 and @xmath230 are respectively @xmath231 and @xmath232 . we note that @xmath233 in this approach corresponds to a smaller power correction than is required in the dw model . this is probably a consequence of the inclusion of pieces of higher perturbative orders via a principal value prescription , although it leads to a somewhat small value ( compared to the world average ) of the coupling at scale @xmath234 . next we turn to the renormalisation group improved ( rgi ) perturbative estimates @xcite that have also been used to compare with event shape data for the mean value of different event shapes in @xmath5 annihilation . the basic idea behind this approach is to consider the dependence of the observable on the scale @xmath82 , which can be expressed using renormalisation group invariance as @xmath235 where in the above formula @xmath236 , @xmath237 , with @xmath238 being the mean value of a given event shape and @xmath239 being the coefficient of @xmath240 in its perturbative expansion . from comparisons to @xmath5 event - shape data using the rgi approach . the band shows the mean value of @xmath94 and uncertainty , as obtained from the observables below the dashed line . figure taken from ref . @xcite.,scaledwidth=40.0% ] thus the first term in the perturbative expansion of @xmath109 is simply @xmath241 . the @xmath242 are renormalisation scheme independent quantities . in particular the quantity @xmath243 is simply the ratio of the first two coefficients of the qcd @xmath145 function while @xmath244 additionally depends on the first three ( up to nnlo ) perturbative coefficients in the expansion of @xmath245 . current studies using this method are therefore restricted to an nlo analysis involving @xmath246 alone . with this simplification , the solution of eq . ( [ eq : rgi ] ) simply corresponds to the introduction of an observable - specific renormalisation scheme and associated scale parameter @xmath247 which is such that it sets the nlo perturbative term to be zero ( and neglects higher perturbative orders ) . its relation to the standard @xmath248 is easily obtained : @xmath249 where @xmath250 and @xmath251 , with @xmath252 being the nlo coefficient in the @xmath253 expansion for the observable . the terms in the bracket account for different definitions of the coupling in terms of @xmath254 as used in the @xmath109 and @xmath253 schemes . in the specific case of fits to @xmath5 event shape mean values , the above approach has met with a considerable success @xcite . in particular the introduction of @xmath247 seems to remove any need for a significant power correction . the delphi collaboration @xcite have performed a combined fit of the parameter @xmath247 and a parameter @xmath255 that quantifies the power correction @xcite . the value of @xmath255 was found to be consistent with zero in most cases and rather small in all cases which indicates that there is no real need for a power behaved correction once the perturbative expansion is fixed through the rgi technique . the agreement between @xmath1 values extracted from different observables is impressive ( see figure [ fig : rgi ] ) with a spread that is only about half as large as that obtained using the standard perturbative result supplemented by a power correction term , using the dw initiated model . while it is clear that the size of the power correction piece inevitably depends on how one choses to define the perturbative expansion ( in fact all the methods discussed thus far , including the dw model and the gardi - grunberg approach , account for this effect ) , it is nevertheless very interesting that for several different observables , with significantly different perturbative coefficients , one observes after the introduction of rgi , hardly any need for a power correction term . certainly it is not clear on the basis of any physical arguments , why the genuine non - perturbative power correction should be vanishingly small and that a perturbative result defined in a certain way should lead to a complete description of the data . the clarification of this issue is still awaited and the above findings are worth further attention and study . a final point to be kept in mind about the rgi approach in the above form , is that it is valid only for inclusive observables that depend on just a single relevant scale parameter @xmath82 . this makes its applicability somewhat limited and for instance it is not currently clear how to extend the procedure so as to allow a meaningful study of event shape distributions in @xmath5 annihilation or dis event shape mean values and distributions ( which involve additional scales ) . so far our discussion of comparisons between theory and experiment has been limited to a study of mean values of the event shapes . as we have seen , there is some ambiguity in the interpretation of these comparisons , with a range of different approaches being able to fit the same data . this is in many respects an unavoidable limitation of studies of mean values , since the principal characteristic of the different models that is being tested is their @xmath82-dependence , which can also be influenced by a range of ( neglected ) higher - order contributions . in contrast , the full distributions of event shapes contain considerably more information and therefore have the potential to be more discriminatory . in section [ sec : perturbative ] we discussed the perturbative calculation of distributions . as for mean values though , the comparison to data is complicated by the need for non - perturbative corrections . these corrections however involve many more degrees of freedom than for mean values , and there are a variety of ways of including them . accordingly we separate our discussion into two parts : in section [ sec : evgen ] we shall consider studies in which hadronisation corrections are taken from monte carlo event generators , and where the main object of study is the perturbative distribution , with for example fits of the strong coupling . in section [ sec : anldist ] we shall then consider studies which involve analytical models for the non - perturbative corrections , and where it is as much the non - perturbative models , as the perturbative calculations that are under study . compared to a variety of event generators @xcite . the shaded band in the lower plot indicates the experimental statistical and systematic errors added in quadrature . figure taken from @xcite.,title="fig:",scaledwidth=48.0% ] compared to a variety of event generators @xcite . the shaded band in the lower plot indicates the experimental statistical and systematic errors added in quadrature . figure taken from @xcite.,title="fig:",scaledwidth=48.0% ] before considering the purely perturbative studies mentioned above , let us recall that one major use of event shape distributions has been in the testing and tuning @xcite of monte carlo event generators such as herwig @xcite , jetset / pythia @xcite and ariadne @xcite . figure [ fig : tuning ] shows comparisons for two event shapes , the thrust and thrust major , and the agreement is remarkable testimony to the ability of the event generators to reproduce the data . the use of event generators to probe the details of qcd is unfortunately rather difficult , essentially because they contain a number of parameters affecting both the non - perturbative modelling and in some cases the treatment of the perturbative shower . furthermore though considerable progress is being made in matching to fixed order calculations ( see for example @xcite ) , event generators are in general able to guarantee neither the nll accuracy nor the nlo accuracy of full matched nll - nlo resummed calculations . event - shapes ( global @xcite two - jet event shapes ) herwig @xcite is expected to be correct to nll accuracy . ] nevertheless , the good agreement of the event generators with the data suggests that the bulk of the dynamics is correct and in particular that a good model for the hadronisation corrections can be had by comparing parton and hadron ` levels ' of the generator . there has been a very widespread use of event generators in this way to complement the nll+nlo perturbative calculations . such a method has both advantages and drawbacks and it is worth devoting some space to them here . on one hand , the parton level of an event generator is not a theoretically well - defined concept it is regularised with some effective parton mass or transverse momentum cutoff , which already embodies some amount of non - perturbative correction . in contrast the nlo+nll partonic prediction integrates down to zero momenta without any form ( or need ) of regularisation . this too implies some amount of non - perturbative contribution , but of a rather different nature from that included via a cutoff . the resulting difference between the event - generator and the purely perturbative nlo+nll parton levels means that the ` hadronisation ' that must be applied to correct them to hadron level is different in the two cases . there are nevertheless reasons why event - generators are still used for determining the hadronisation corrections . the simplest is perhaps that they give a very good description of the data ( cf . [ fig : tuning ] ) , which suggests that they make a reasonable job of approximating the underlying dynamics . furthermore the good description is obtained with a single set of parameters for all event shapes , whereas as we shall see , other approaches with a single ( common ) parameter are currently able to give equally good descriptions only for a limited number of event shapes at a time . additionally , the objection that the monte carlo parton level is ill - defined can , partially , be addressed by including a systematic error on the hadronisation : it is possible for example to change the internal cutoff on the monte carlo parton shower and at the same time retune the hadronisation parameters in such a way that the monte carlo description of the hadron - level data remains reasonable . in this way one allows for the fact that the connection between monte carlo and nll+nlo ` parton - levels ' is not understood . this is the procedure that has been used for example in @xcite , and the results are illustrated in figure [ fig : sldhadr ] as a hadronisation correction factor @xmath256 with an uncertainty corresponding to the shaded band . , with uncertainties , as discussed in the text ) obtained from the ratio of jetset parton to hadron - level distributions . it is compared to nlo and nll+nlo predictions . also shown is the detector to hadron - level correction factor @xmath257 . figure taken from @xcite . ] two further points are to be made regarding monte carlo hadronisation corrections . firstly , as is starting now to be well known , it is strongly recommended not to correct the data to parton - level , but rather to correct the theoretical perturbative prediction to hadron level . this is because the correction to parton level entails the addition of extra assumptions , which a few years later may be very difficult to deconvolve from the parton - level ` data ' . it is straightforward on the other hand to apply a new hadronisation model to a perturbative calculation . secondly it is best not to treat the hadronisation correction as a simple multiplicative factor . to understand why , one should look again at figure [ fig : sldhadr ] ( which , dating from several years ago , corrects data to parton level ) . the multiplicative factor @xmath256 ( parton@xmath258hadron ) varies very rapidly close to the peak of the distribution and goes from above @xmath161 to below @xmath161 . this is because the distribution itself varies very rapidly in this region and the effect of hadronisation is ( to a first approximation , see below ) to shift the peak to larger values of the observable . but a multiplicative factor , rather than shifting the peak , suppresses it in one place and recreates it ( from non - peak - like structure ) in another . instead of applying a multiplicative correction , the best way to include a monte carlo hadronisation correction is to determine a transfer matrix @xmath259 which describes the fraction of events in bin @xmath56 at parton level that end up in in bin @xmath55 at hadron level . then for a binned perturbative distribution @xmath260 , the binned hadronised distribution @xmath261 is obtained by matrix multiplication , @xmath262 . this has been used for example in @xcite . having considered the basis and methods for including hadronisation corrections from event generators , let us now examine some of the perturbative studies made possible by this approach . the majority of them use nll+nlo perturbative calculations to fit for the strong coupling ( as discussed below some , e.g. @xcite , just use nlo results , which exist for a wider range of observables ) and such fits can be said to be one of the principal results from event - shape studies . in general there is rather good agreement between the data and the resummed predictions ( cf . [ fig : sldhadr ] ) . obtained by fitting nll+nlo event - shape distributions to l3 data at a range of centre of mass energies ( figure taken from @xcite ) . only experimental uncertainties are shown.,scaledwidth=60.0% ] an example of such a study is given in figure [ fig : l3asevln ] , which shows results for fits of @xmath1 to l3 data at a range of energies ( including points below @xmath263 from radiative events which , as discussed earlier , are to be taken with some caution ) . one important result from such studies is an overall value for @xmath1 , which in this case is @xmath264 @xcite , where the first error is experimental and the second is theoretical . similar results have been given by other collaborations , e.g. @xmath265 from aleph @xcite . there is also good evidence for the evolution of the coupling , though leaving out the potentially doubtful radiative points leaves the situation somewhat less clearcut , due to the limited statistics at high energies ( another resummed study which gives good evidence for the running of the coupling uses jade and opal data @xcite , however it is limited to jet rates ) . these and similar results from the other lep collaborations and jade highlight two important points . firstly at higher energies there is a need to combine results from all the lep experiments in order to reduce the statistical errors and so improve the evidence for the running of the coupling in the region above @xmath127 . work in this direction is currently in progress @xcite . so far only preliminary results are available @xcite , and as well as improving the picture of the high - energy running of the coupling , they suggest a slightly smaller value of @xmath1 than that quoted above , more in accord with world averages @xcite . secondly , in the overall result for @xmath266 , by far the most important contribution to the error is that from theoretical uncertainties . however theoretical uncertainties are notoriously difficult to estimate , since they relate to unknown higher orders . systematic investigations of the various sources of uncertainty have been carried out in @xcite and in particular @xcite proposes a standard for the set of sources of uncertainty that ought to be considered , together with an approach for combining the different sources into a single overall uncertainty on @xmath94 . one of the main principles behind the method is that while one may have numerous estimates of sources of theoretical uncertainty , it is not advisable to combine them in quadrature , as one might be tempted to do , because this is likely to lead to a double - counting of uncertainties . rather , one should examine the different sources of uncertainty across the whole range of the distribution and at each point , take the maximum of all sources to build up an uncertainty envelope or band , represented by the shaded area in figure [ fig : lepqcdbands ] ( shown relative to a reference prediction for a ` standard ' theory ) . the overall uncertainty on the coupling ( rather than the distribution ) is given by the range of variation of @xmath94 such that the prediction remains within the band . it is to be noted that this kind of approach is of relevance not just to event - shape studies but also quite generally to any resummed matched calculation , which is inherently subject to many sources of arbitrariness . allowed such that the prediction stays within the uncertainty band.,scaledwidth=63.0% ] one of the drawbacks of nll+nlo studies is that the nll resummed predictions exist for only a fraction of observables . recently there has been an extensive study by the delphi collaboration @xcite of 18 event - shape distributions compared to nlo calculations . since in most cases nlo calculations with a renormalisation scale @xmath267 tend to describe the data rather poorly , they have examined various options for estimating higher orders so as to improve the agreement . their main approach involves a simultaneous fit of the coupling and the renormalisation scale , i.e. the renormalisation scale dependence is taken as a way of parameterising possible higher orders . in such a procedure the choice of fit - range for the observable is rather critical , since the true higher - orders may involve have quite a different structure from that parameterised by the @xmath168 dependence . the delphi analysis restricts the fit range to be that in which a good fit can be obtained . with these conditions they find relatively consistent values of @xmath94 across their whole range of observables ( finding a scatter of a few percent ) , with a relatively modest theoretical uncertainty , as estimated from the further variation of @xmath168 by a factor of @xmath13 to @xmath16 around the optimal scale . their overall result from all observables treated in this way is @xmath268 ( including both experimental and theoretical errors ) . they also compare this approach to a range of other ways of ` estimating ' higher orders . they find for example that some theoretically based methods for setting the scale ( principle of minimal sensitivity @xcite , effective charge @xcite ) lead to scales that are quite correlated to the experimentally fitted ones , while another method ( blm @xcite ) is rather uncorrelated . they compare also to resummation approaches , though there is no equivalent renormalisation scale choice that can be made . instead the comparison involves rather the quality of fit to the distribution and the final spread of final @xmath1 values as a measure of neglected higher - order uncertainties . not surprisingly , they find that while the nll results work well in the two - jet region , in the three - jet region the combined nll+nlo predictions fare not that much better than the pure ( @xmath267 ) nlo results . they go on to argue that nll+nlo is somewhat disfavoured compared to nlo with an ` optimal ' scale . this statement is however to be treated with some caution , since the fit range was chosen specifically so as to obtain a good fit for nlo with the ` optimal ' scale one could equally have chosen a fit range tuned to the nll+nlo prediction and one wonders whether the nlo with optimal scale choice would then have fared so well . regardless of this issue of fit range , it is interesting to note that over the set of observables which can be treated by both methods , the total spread in @xmath1 values is quite similar , being @xmath269 in the case of nlo with optimal scale choice and @xmath270 for nll+nlo . this is similar to the spread seen for fits to mean values with analytical hadronisation models ( fig . [ fig : meanfits ] ) , though the rgi fits of @xcite have a somewhat smaller error . the jet rates ( especially the durham and cambridge algorithms and certain members of the jade family ) are among the few observables for which the pure nlo calculation gives a reasonable description of the distribution ( cf . table 3 of @xcite ) . one particularly interesting set of nlo studies makes use of the 3-jet rate as a function of @xmath271 ( this is just the integral of the distribution of @xmath137 ) in events with primary @xmath144-quarks as compared to light - quark events @xcite ( some of the analyses use other observables , such as the 4-jet rate or the thrust ) . using nlo calculations which account for massive quarks @xcite makes it possible , in such studies , to extract a value for the @xmath144 mass at a renormalisation scale of @xmath263 , giving first evidence of the ( expected ) running of the @xmath144-quark mass , since all the analyses find @xmath272 in the range @xmath273 to @xmath274 gev ( with rather variable estimates of the theoretical error ) . we have already seen , in section [ sec : meanpc ] , that analytical models for hadronisation corrections , combined with normal perturbative predictions , can give a rather good description of mean values . there the inclusion of a non - perturbative ( hadronisation ) correction was a rather simple affair , eq . ( [ eq : meancorrections ] ) , since it was an additive procedure . in contrast the general relation between the full distribution @xmath275 for an observable @xmath276 and the perturbatively calculated distribution @xmath277 is more complicated , @xmath278 where @xmath279 encodes all the non - perturbative information . ( [ eq : shapegenconvoluion ] ) can be seen as a generalised convolution , where the shape of the convolution function depends on the value @xmath86 of the variable as well as the coupling and hard scale . such a general form contains far more information however than can currently be predicted , or even conveniently parameterised . accordingly analytical hadronisation approaches generally make a number of simplifying assumptions , intended to be valid for some restricted range of the observable . the most radical simplification of eq . ( [ eq : shapegenconvoluion ] ) that can be made is to replace @xmath280 with a @xmath281-function , @xmath282 , leading to @xmath283 this was proposed and investigated in @xcite , and the combination @xmath284 is the same that appears in the power correction for the mean value @xcite , discussed in section [ sec : meanpc ] . ( [ eq : npshift ] ) holds for observables with an @xmath1 independent power correction in tables [ tab : cvs ] and [ tab : cvsdis ] , in the region @xmath285 , where the lower limit ensures that one can neglect the width of the convolution function @xmath286 , while the upper limit is the restriction that one be in the born limit ( in which the @xmath152 were originally calculated ) . for certain 3-jet observables a similar picture holds , but with a shift that depends on the kinematics of the 3-jet configuration @xcite . for the broadenings , the situation is more complicated because the power correction is enhanced by the rapidity over which the quark and thrust axes can be considered to coincide , @xmath287 , @xmath288 being the angle between thrust and quark axes this angle is strongly correlated with the value of the broadening ( determined by perturbative radiation ) and accordingly the extent of the shift becomes @xmath252-dependent @xcite . the simplest case is the @xmath0 wide - jet broadening , for which one has @xmath289 where the shift is written for the integrated distribution @xmath290 in order to simplify the expressions . the @xmath291 enhancement for the power correction to the mean broadening ( tables [ tab : cvs ] and [ tab : cvsdis ] ) comes about simply because the average value of @xmath292 , after integration over @xmath86 with the resummed distribution , is of order @xmath293 . the full form for @xmath294 and analogous results for the total @xmath0 and dis broadenings have been given in @xcite , with results existing also for the thrust minor @xcite , and the dis and drell - yan out - of plane momenta @xcite . yet subtler instances of perturbative , non - perturbative interplay arise for observables like the eec @xcite and dis azimuthal correlation @xcite , with the appearance of _ fractional _ powers of @xmath82 in the power correction , as mentioned before . -dependent non - perturbative shift in the jet broadening distribution for @xmath5 annihilation . the dashed curve is the perturbative prediction ( nll+nlo ) , while the solid curve includes a non - perturbative ( @xmath252-dependent ) shift . figure taken from @xcite . right : nll+nlo distribution with a @xmath4 shift for @xmath295 in dis at a range of @xmath82 values ( round dots indicate points used in fits ) @xcite . the @xmath82 values range from 15 gev ( bottom ) to 81 gev ( top).,title="fig:",scaledwidth=44.0%,scaledwidth=48.0% ] -dependent non - perturbative shift in the jet broadening distribution for @xmath5 annihilation . the dashed curve is the perturbative prediction ( nll+nlo ) , while the solid curve includes a non - perturbative ( @xmath252-dependent ) shift . figure taken from @xcite . right : nll+nlo distribution with a @xmath4 shift for @xmath295 in dis at a range of @xmath82 values ( round dots indicate points used in fits ) @xcite . the @xmath82 values range from 15 gev ( bottom ) to 81 gev ( top).,title="fig:",scaledwidth=48.0% ] one might a priori have thought that the formal domain of validity of the shift approximation , @xmath296 , would be somewhat limited . figure [ fig : broadpc ] ( left ) illustrates what happens in the case of @xmath297 quite remarkably the shift describes the data well over a large range of @xmath297 , with slight problems only in the extreme two - jet region ( peak of the distribution ) and in the four - jet region ( @xmath298 ) . similar features are seen in the right - hand plot of fig . [ fig : broadpc ] for @xmath299 in dis at a range of @xmath82 values : a large part of the distribution is described for all @xmath82 values , and problems appear only in the @xmath91 jet region ( @xmath300 ) , and in the @xmath122 jet region for low @xmath82 . this success is reproduced for quite a range of observables in @xmath0 and dis . -@xmath209 contours for simultaneous fits of @xmath94 and @xmath163 to @xmath0 event - shape distributions . the error contours account for statistic , systematical and theoretical uncertainties . the shaded band indicates the result for @xmath1 when using monte carlo hadronisation models . figure taken from @xcite . right : @xmath161-@xmath209 contours from fits to h1 dis event shape distributions @xcite with statistical and systematic errors added in quadrature . figure taken from @xcite.,title="fig:",scaledwidth=48.0% ] -@xmath209 contours for simultaneous fits of @xmath94 and @xmath163 to @xmath0 event - shape distributions . the error contours account for statistic , systematical and theoretical uncertainties . the shaded band indicates the result for @xmath1 when using monte carlo hadronisation models . figure taken from @xcite . right : @xmath161-@xmath209 contours from fits to h1 dis event shape distributions @xcite with statistical and systematic errors added in quadrature . figure taken from @xcite.,title="fig:",scaledwidth=48.0% ] as was the case for mean values , a more systematic test involves carrying out a simultaneous fit of @xmath94 and @xmath163 for each observable and then checking for consistency between observables and with the corresponding results for mean values . results from @xmath0 and dis are shown in figure [ fig : distcont ] , taken from @xcite and @xcite . other fits that have been carried out in recent years include @xcite .- parameter in @xmath65-jet events . ] just as for the mean values , one notes that ( with exception of @xmath301 and @xmath302 in @xmath0 , to be discussed shortly ) there is good consistency between observables , both for @xmath0 and dis . this statement holds holds also for the eec , fitted in @xcite , not shown in fig . [ fig : distcont ] . there is also good agreement with the results for the mean values , fig . [ fig : meanfits ] , except marginally for dis @xmath94 results , which for distributions are in better accord with the world average . the good agreement between distributions and mean values is important in the light of alternative approaches to fitting mean values , such as the rgi which , we recall , seems to suggest that the power correction for mean values can just as well be interpreted as higher order contributions . were this really the case then one would expect to see no relation between @xmath163 results for mean values and distributions . despite the generally good agreement , some problems do persist . examining different groups results for the @xmath1-@xmath163 fits one finds that for some observables there is a large spread in the results . for example for the @xmath0 @xmath297 , aleph @xcite find @xmath303 while the jade result @xcite shown in fig . [ fig : distcont ] corresponds to @xmath304 ( and this differs from a slightly earlier jade result @xmath305 @xcite ) . while the results all agree to within errors , those errors are largely theoretical and would be expected to be a common systematic on all results . in other words we would expect the results to be much closer together than @xmath161-@xmath209 . that this is not the case suggests that the fits might be unstable with respect to small changes in details of the fit , for example the fit range ( as has been observed when including data in the range @xmath306 in the fit corresponding to the right hand plot of figure [ fig : distcont ] @xcite ) . these differences can lead to contradictory conclusions regarding the success of the description of different observables and it would be of value for the different groups to work together to understand the origin of the differences , perhaps in a context such as the lep qcd working group . there do remain two cases however where there seems to be clear incompatibility between the data and theoretical prediction : the heavy - jet mass , @xmath196 ( also referred to as @xmath302 ) and the wide - jet broadening , @xmath301 . the heavy - jet mass is subject to @xmath146 hadron mass effects , as discussed already in the context of mean values , however even after accounting for this by considering @xmath62 or @xmath57-scheme data , as has been done by delphi @xcite , the results appear to be rather inconsistent with other observables : @xmath1 is too small and @xmath163 too large , as for @xmath301 , with a fixed @xmath307 lead to a consistent value for @xmath308 , though the overall fit quality is poor . ] though less extreme . the common point between these two observables is that they both select the heavier / wider hemisphere and so are less inclusive than other observables . studies with event generators @xcite suggest that whereas for more inclusive observables the 2-jet limit of the shift works well even into the 3-jet region , for heavy - wide observables the 3-jet limit behaves very differently from the 2-jet limit and these differences becomes relevant even for relatively low values of the observable ( some partially related discussion of the problem has been given also in @xcite ) . we will come back to this and other potential explanations below when we discuss shape functions . beyond the ` usual ' observables discussed above , there are some recent results also for the @xmath38-parameter shoulder at @xmath125 , where @xcite the shoulder position is seen to be consistent with a shift with the usual 2-jet coefficient @xmath205 this is in contradiction with the ( smaller ) result eq . ( [ eq : c34power ] ) for the shift to the shoulder ; however the analysis @xcite does nt take into account resummation effects at the shoulder which may also contribute to an effective shift . a first analysis of corrections to the @xmath309 distribution has been given in @xcite which shows evidence for @xmath310 contributions in the @xmath309 distribution at the two lowest jade centre of mass energies ( 14 and 22 gev ) . one last interesting point to discuss regarding the shift approximation for hadronisation is an application to the measurement of the qcd colour factors . the fact that the hadronisation is encoded via just a single parameter , with all the dependence on colour factors available explicitly for the perturbative and non - perturbative contributions , means that it is feasible to carry out a simultaneous fit not only for @xmath311 and @xmath163 but also for one or more of the qcd colour factors @xmath139 , @xmath138 and @xmath312 @xcite . this would have been much more difficult using monte carlo hadronisation because all the hadronisation parameters would have had to have been retuned for each change of the colour factors . the results for this fit are summarised and compared to other approaches in figure [ fig : colfact ] @xcite , which shows @xmath16-@xmath209 contours for @xmath138 and @xmath139 . while other approaches constrain the ratio @xmath313 , the event - shape approach gives by far the best independent measurement of @xmath139 and @xmath138 . as a result the combination of the results gives rather tight limits on the colour factors , which are in good agreement with the qcd expectation . ( shift ) power corrections and a variety of other methods . figure taken from @xcite . the ellipses show correlated measurements from studies of the angular distributions of 4-jet events @xcite and event shapes @xcite , while the lines are obtained from studies of the gluon fragmentation function @xcite and from multiplicities in gluon jets @xcite.,scaledwidth=51.0% ] we have already mentioned that the approximation of a simple shift is valid only in the region @xmath296 . to better understand the origin of the lower limit , let us expand eq . ( [ eq : npshift ] ) , @xmath314 where @xmath315 is the @xmath316 derivative of @xmath317 with respect to @xmath86 . since @xmath315 goes as @xmath318 one sees that when the shift @xmath319 all terms in the series are of the same order . while the @xmath320 term can be related to the power correction to the mean value of @xmath276 , the shift merely provides an ansatz for the higher terms . the breakdown for small values of @xmath321 is clearly visible for the ( dis ) thrust in fig . [ fig : broadpc ] ( right ) . a physically transparent way of dealing with the @xmath322 terms has been developed by korchemsky , sterman and collaborators @xcite . one approximates @xmath323 in eq . ( [ eq : shapegenconvoluion ] ) by a _ shape function _ @xcite @xmath324 ( rather than the @xmath281-function which corresponds to a pure shift ) , @xmath325 in eq . ( [ eq : expandedshift ] ) , @xmath326 is then replaced by @xmath327 where @xmath328 is the @xmath316 moment of @xmath329 . there is considerable freedom in one s choice of the form for the shape function . accordingly , success in fitting a given event - shape distribution for any single value of @xmath82 can not , alone , be considered strong evidence in favour of the shape - function picture . the true test of the approach comes by determining the shape function at one value of @xmath82 and then establishing whether it applies for all values of @xmath82 . this is illustrated for the @xmath0 thrust in fig . [ fig : thrustshape ] ( left ) , where the following shape - function has been used @xcite , @xmath330 with two free parameters , @xmath331 and @xmath254 ( it has been argued that the behaviour of this function for small @xmath176 and large @xmath176 is similar to that expected from a simple physical model for the dynamics at the origin of the shape function @xcite ) . one notes the remarkable agreement , far into the two - jet region , for the whole range of @xmath82 values . ) . shown for @xmath332 and @xmath333 gev . figure taken from @xcite . right : the thrust distribution at the perturbative ( dge ) level , with a non - perturbative shift , and with a shape function . figure taken from @xcite.,title="fig:",scaledwidth=48.0%,scaledwidth=48.0% ] ) . shown for @xmath332 and @xmath333 gev . figure taken from @xcite . right : the thrust distribution at the perturbative ( dge ) level , with a non - perturbative shift , and with a shape function . figure taken from @xcite.,title="fig:",scaledwidth=48.0%,scaledwidth=48.0% ] this is a clear success for the shape - function approach as compared to the simple shift discussed above . however the drawback of shape - functions is that a priori one loses all predictivity ( save for the first moment ) when going from one observable to another . this predictivity was one of the main strengths of the shift approach . considerable work has therefore been devoted to understanding both the general properties of shape functions and the relations between shape functions of different observables . one line of investigation has been to relate the shape functions for the thrust and heavy - jet mass ( @xmath196 ) this can be done with the help of the observation @xcite that in the two - jet limit the thrust is just the sum of the light and heavy - jet ( squared normalised ) masses . in @xcite korchemsky and tafat introduced a shape function @xmath334 describing the distribution of non - perturbative radiation in each of the two hemispheres . the shape function for the thrust is then obtained by @xmath335 instead for the heavy - jet mass one calculates the full ( np ) double differential distribution for the two jet masses and from that derives the heavy - jet mass distribution ( this is not quite equivalent to a simple shape - function for @xmath196 ) . this approach gave a good fit to the thrust and heavy - jet mass data , on the condition that there was significant correlation between the non - perturbative contribution to the two hemispheres .- parameter ( with an overall rescaling to ensure the correct first moment ) , however the data were less well described than for the thrust . this is perhaps not surprising : owing to different sensitivities to large - angle radiation , the thrust and @xmath38-parameter shape functions are expected to have a different structure of higher moments @xcite . ] it is difficult to interpret this result however , because as has already been mentioned , the default measurement scheme for the jet masses suffers from extra ( universality - breaking ) @xmath146 corrections , and it is possible that in @xcite these are being mimicked by inter - hemisphere correlations . the thrust and heavy - jet mass have been investigated in great detail also by gardi and rathsman @xcite . in analogy with the approach for the mean thrust @xcite , they attempt not only to account for nll+nlo and power correction contributions , but also for all ( perturbative ) enhanced effects associated with the running of the coupling , within a formalism that they refer to as dressed gluon exponentiation ( dge ) . among the interesting theoretical results ( see also @xcite ) is that the renormalon analysis suggests that the second moment of the shape function should be precisely that expected from a pure shift ( the same is true for the @xmath38-parameter @xcite ) . this observation seems to be consistent with fits to the data , and would explain why the shift approximation works so well , at least for the relevant observables . the right - hand plot of fig . [ fig : thrustshape ] shows the result of their analysis for the thrust , with both a shift and a shape - function . while the shape - function is clearly needed in the immediate vicinity of the peak and below , it is striking to see , above the peak , how well it is approximated by the shift . one of the other interesting results in @xcite relates to the analysis of the heavy - jet mass . in contrast to @xcite , a common hadron - mass scheme ( decay - scheme ) is used for the thrust and the heavy - jet mass , and there are no inter - hemisphere correlations in their shape function . using the same parameters for the thrust and @xmath196 leads to reasonable fits , suggesting that the true inter - hemisphere correlations may actually be small . ( a fit for @xmath196 alone does however prefer a lower value of @xmath94 than for the thrust , as is seen also with the usual shifted nll+nlo approach @xcite ) . a puzzle that emerges in the work of @xcite is that all the fits lead to quite small values of the coupling , @xmath336 with a theoretical error of about @xmath210 . a similarly low result was obtained in the analogous analysis of the mean thrust @xcite . in contrast a study of @xmath144-fragmentation using dressed gluon exponentiation finds more standard values , @xmath337 @xcite . let us close our discussion of shape functions with a recent result by berger & sterman @xcite . given that there are no simple relations between the shape functions for most common event shapes , they instead consider a new class of event shapes @xcite whose definition involves a parameter @xmath331 which allows the nature of the event shape to be continuously varied from a broadening ( @xmath338 ) to a thrust - type observable ( @xmath339 ) and beyond . their observation is that for all variants of the observable with @xmath340 , the logarithm of any moment of the shape functions scales as @xmath341 . in practice this scaling is found to hold in monte carlo studies of this class of observables it would therefore be interesting to have data for these observables with which to make a comparison . conceptually , event shapes are rather simple observables , yet they are sensitive to a range of characteristics of qcd radiation . this combination of theoretical simplicity and experimental sensitivity is perhaps one of the main reasons why event shapes have found so many applications . as we have seen , they provide vital inputs in studies of the ingredients of the qcd lagrangian , such as the coupling and the colour factors ; they play an important role in the tuning and testing of event generators ; and they are at the heart of recent investigations into analytical approaches to understanding the dynamics of hadronisation . there remain several directions in which progress may be expected ( or at the very least hoped for ) in coming years . all the experimental comparisons discussed here have been for event - shapes that vanish in the @xmath16-jet limit , yet there have been significant theoretical developments in recent years for observables that vanish also in the @xmath65-jet limit , examples being the @xmath39-parameter and thrust minor @xcite . studies with jet rates @xcite suggest that going to such ` three - jet ' observables could reduce theoretical errors , though as discussed in @xcite this needs to be investigated more systematically . additionally three - jet observables will allow much more stringent tests of analytical hadronisation approaches since for the first time they introduce sensitivity to predictions about hadronisation from a gluon @xcite , not just from a quark . one of the frontiers of event shape studies is their extension to new processes . while @xmath0 is the traditional domain for event - shape studies , we have seen that studies in dis are in many respects competitive with @xmath0 results . additionally they provide important input on the question of universality of analytical hadronisation models , ruling out for example significant modifications of the hadronisation picture stemming from interactions with the proton remnant . though so far the question has received only limited study , one interesting application of dis studies would be in the use of event shapes for obtaining information on parton distribution functions , as suggested in @xcite . currently an option that is attracting growing experimental @xcite and theoretical @xcite interest is the development of event shapes in hadron - hadron collisions . though much work remains to be done on this subject , it seems that the sensitivity to parton distributions will be somewhat stronger than in most dis observables . furthermore one expects a rich hadronisation structure associated both with the four - jet structure of hadronic dijet events and with the properties of the underlying event . it is to be hoped that the availability of automated resummation methods @xcite will make the theoretical aspects of the study of new observables and processes more straightforward than has been the case in the past . another frontier on which progress is expected in near future is with respect to the accuracy of theoretical predictions . nnlo perturbative calculations are making rapid progress ( for a recent review see @xcite ) with the main outstanding problem being that of a full subtraction procedure for combining zero , one and two - loop contributions and its implementation in a monte carlo integrator . progress on nnll resummations is also being made , albeit so far only in inclusive cases @xcite . though technically more involved , an extension to event shape resummations is certainly conceivable in the near future . aside from the expected gains in accuracy that are the main motivation for these calculations , it will also be interesting to compare the exact higher - order calculations with predictions from approaches such as @xcite which aim to identify the physically dominant higher - order contributions and in some cases @xcite claim to significantly reduce the theoretical uncertainties on @xmath94 . less predictable is what development can be expected on the subject of hadronisation corrections . as we have seen , much has been learnt from event - shape studies . yet a variety of open questions remain . at a practical level it would for example be of interest to see an extension of the shape - function approach to a wider range of variables , including the quite subtle case of the broadenings and also to dis event shapes . the wealth of dis data at low @xmath82 , where shape functions are most important , makes the latter especially interesting . there remain also important issues that are poorly understood even at the conceptual level . for example predictions are currently limited to the domain in which the event - shape is close to vanishing ( e.g. @xmath14 in the @xmath16-jet limit ) . it is tempting to suggest that problems that persist for a couple of ` recalcitrant ' observables ( specifically , @xmath196 , @xmath301 ) may actually be due to large differences between the power correction in the three - jet region ( a significant part of the fit - range ) and that in the well - understood two - jet limit ( see e.g. fig . 3 of @xcite ) . but techniques that would allow the calculation of the power correction to , say , the thrust or the broadening in the @xmath65-jet limit do not yet exist . another ( partially related ) issue is that of anomalous dimensions these have so far only been calculated for @xmath146 effects that are associated with hadron masses @xcite . yet , as has been pointed out also in @xcite , they are bound to be present for all classes of power suppressed contributions . one clear physical origin for them is that soft - gluons ( or hadrons ) with transverse momenta of order @xmath254 are radiated not just from the @xmath206 system but also from all soft perturbative gluons with transverse momenta between @xmath254 and @xmath82 . accounting for radiation from the latter will clearly lead to enhancements of power corrections by terms @xmath342 . and a final point , not to be forgotten , is that most of the analytical hadronisation approaches are essentially perturbative methods ` in disguise ' . an understanding of how they really relate to _ _ hadron__isation is very much lacking . let us close this review by remarking that one of the characteristics of event shape studies is that progress is made not merely through a better understanding of existing observables and data , but also through critical experimental studies of new observables with ( supposedly ! ) better theoretical properties . the dialogue between experimenters and theorists is crucial in this respect . we look forward to its being as fruitful in coming years as it has been up to now . it goes without saying that we are grateful to our collaborators and numerous other colleagues , including members of the lep qcd working group , for the many stimulating discussions that we have had about event shapes . for discussions on issues that arose specifically while writing this review , we thank in particular g. heinrich , f. krauss , c. j. maxwell , g. rodrigo , m. h. seymour , h. stenzel and g. zanderighi . furthermore we are indebted to a. banfi , yu . l. dokshitzer and g. zanderighi for their careful reading of and helpful comments on the manuscript . one of us ( gps ) is grateful also to the cern th division for hospitality during the course of this work . 999 j. r. ellis , m. k. gaillard and g. g. ross , nucl . b * 111 * ( 1976 ) 253 [ erratum - ibid . b * 130 * ( 1977 ) 516 ] . e. farhi , phys . * 39 * ( 1977 ) 1587 . h. georgi and m. machacek , phys . * 39 * ( 1977 ) 1237 . g. c. fox and s. wolfram , phys . * 41 * ( 1978 ) 1581 ; ibid . b * 149 * ( 1979 ) 413 [ erratum - ibid . b * 157 * ( 1979 ) 543 ] . c. l. basham , l. s. brown , s. d. ellis and s. t. love , phys . * 41 * ( 1978 ) 1585 ; c. l. basham , l. s. brown , s. d. ellis and s. t. love , phys . d * 19 * ( 1979 ) 2018 . r. k. ellis , w. j. stirling and b. r. webber , _ qcd and collider physics _ , cambridge university press , 1996 . g. marchesini , b. r. webber , g. abbiendi , i. g. knowles , m. h. seymour and l. stanco , comput . commun . * 67 * ( 1992 ) 465 . g. corcella _ et al . _ , jhep * 0101 * ( 2001 ) 010 [ hep - ph/0011363 ] . t. sjstrand , comput . commun . * 82 * ( 1994 ) 74 ; t. sjstrand , p. eden , c. friberg , l. lnnblad , g. miu , s. mrenna and e. norrbin , hep - ph/0010017 . l. lnnblad , comput . * 71 * ( 1992 ) 15 . m. beneke , phys . * 317 * ( 1999 ) 1 [ hep - ph/9807443 ] . s. brandt , c. peyrou , r. sosnowski and a. wroblewski , phys . * 12 * ( 1964 ) 57 . l. clavelli , phys . b * 85 * ( 1979 ) 111 ; t. chandramohan and l. clavelli , nucl . b * 184 * ( 1981 ) 365 ; l. clavelli and d. wyler , phys . b * 103 * ( 1981 ) 383 . s. catani , g. turnock and b. r. webber , phys . b * 295 * ( 1992 ) 269 . d. p. barber _ et al . _ [ mark - j collaboration collaboration ] , phys . * 63 * ( 1980 ) 337 . a. banfi , g. marchesini , y. l. dokshitzer and g. zanderighi , jhep * 0007 * ( 2000 ) 002 [ hep - ph/0004027 ] . a. banfi , y. l. dokshitzer , g. marchesini and g. zanderighi , phys . b * 508 * ( 2001 ) 269 [ hep - ph/0010267 ] . a. de rujula , j. r. ellis , e. g. floratos and m. k. gaillard , nucl . b * 138 * ( 1978 ) 387 . r. k. ellis , d. a. ross and a. e. terrano , nucl . b * 178 * ( 1981 ) 421 . g. parisi , phys . b * 74 * ( 1978 ) 65 ; j. f. donoghue , f. e. low and s. y. pi , phys . rev . d * 20 * ( 1979 ) 2759 . j. d. bjorken and s. j. brodsky , phys . d * 1 * ( 1970 ) 1416 ; g. hanson _ et al . _ , phys . * 35 * ( 1975 ) 1609 . c. berger _ [ pluto collaboration ] , phys . b * 82 * ( 1979 ) 449 . w. bartel _ et al . _ [ jade collaboration ] , z. phys . c * 33 * ( 1986 ) 23 . s. catani , yu . l. dokshitzer , m. olsson , g. turnock and b. r. webber , phys . b * 269 * ( 1991 ) 432 . s. bethke , z. kunszt , d. e. soper and w. j. stirling , nucl . b * 370 * ( 1992 ) 310 [ erratum - ibid . b * 523 * ( 1998 ) 681 ] . y. l. dokshitzer , g. d. leder , s. moretti and b. r. webber , jhep * 9708 * ( 1997 ) 001 [ hep - ph/9707323 ] . g. p. salam and d. wicke , jhep * 0105 * ( 2001 ) 061 [ hep - ph/0102343 ] . e. gardi and j. rathsman , nucl . b * 638 * ( 2002 ) 243 [ hep - ph/0201019 ] . r. p. feynman , _ photon hadron interactions _ , w. a. benjamin , new york , 1972 ; r. d. peccei and r. ruckl , nucl . b * 162 * ( 1980 ) 125 ; l. v. gribov , y. l. dokshitzer , s. i. troian and v. a. khoze , sov . jetp * 67 * ( 1988 ) 1303 [ zh . fiz . * 94 * ( 1988 ) 12 ] . k. h. streng , t. f. walsh and p. m. zerwas , z. phys . c * 2 * ( 1979 ) 237 . a. banfi , g. marchesini , g. smye and g. zanderighi , jhep * 0111 * ( 2001 ) 066 [ hep - ph/0111157 ] . m. dasgupta and g. p. salam , jhep * 0208 * ( 2002 ) 032 [ hep - ph/0208073 ] . a. banfi , g. marchesini and g. smye , jhep * 0204 * ( 2002 ) 024 [ hep - ph/0203150 ] . s. catani , y. l. dokshitzer and b. r. webber , phys . b * 285 * ( 1992 ) 291 . a. banfi , g. marchesini , g. smye and g. zanderighi , jhep * 0108 * ( 2001 ) 047 [ hep - ph/0106278 ] . i. a. bertram [ d0 collaboration ] , acta phys . b * 33 * ( 2002 ) 3141 . a. banfi , g. p. salam and g. zanderighi , hep - ph/0304148 ; _ ibid . _ in preparation . a. banfi , hep - ph/0309161 . g. sterman and s. weinberg , phys . * 39 * ( 1977 ) 1436 . w. t. giele and e. w. glover , phys . d * 46 * ( 1992 ) 1980 . s. catani and m. h. seymour , phys . b * 378 * ( 1996 ) 287 [ hep - ph/9602277 ] ; s. catani and m. h. seymour , nucl . b * 485 * ( 1997 ) 291 [ erratum - imbid . b * 510 * ( 1997 ) 503 ] [ hep - ph/9605323 ] . l. j. dixon and a. signer , phys . d * 56 * ( 1997 ) 4031 [ hep - ph/9706285 ] ; a. signer , comput . commun . * 106 * ( 1997 ) 125 . s. weinzierl and d. a. kosower , phys . d * 60 * ( 1999 ) 054028 [ hep - ph/9901277 ] . j. m. campbell , m. a. cullen and e. w. glover , eur . j. c * 9 * ( 1999 ) 245 [ hep - ph/9809429 ] . z. nagy and z. trocsanyi , nucl . b * 486 * ( 1997 ) 189 [ hep - ph/9610498 ] ; z. nagy and z. trocsanyi , phys . * 79 * ( 1997 ) 3604 [ hep - ph/9707309 ] ; z. nagy and z. trocsanyi , phys . d * 59 * ( 1999 ) 014020 [ erratum - ibid . d * 62 * ( 2000 ) 099902 ] [ hep - ph/9806317 ] ; z. nagy and z. trocsanyi , phys . lett . * 87 * ( 2001 ) 082001 [ hep - ph/0104315 ] ; z. nagy , phys . * 88 * ( 2002 ) 122003 [ hep - ph/0110315 ] ; z. nagy , hep - ph/0307268 . b. potter , comput . phys . commun . * 133 * ( 2000 ) 105 [ hep - ph/9911221 ] ; b. potter , comput . commun . * 119 * ( 1999 ) 45 [ hep - ph/9806437 ] . t. gehrmann , hep - ph/0310178 . m. dasgupta and g. p. salam , phys . b * 512 * ( 2001 ) 323 [ hep - ph/0104277 ] . n. brown and w. j. stirling , phys . b * 252 * ( 1990 ) 657 . g. leder , nucl . b * 497 * ( 1997 ) 334 [ hep - ph/9610552 ] . s. catani , g. turnock , b. r. webber and l. trentadue , phys . b * 263 * ( 1991 ) 491 . s. catani , l. trentadue , g. turnock and b. r. webber , nucl . b * 407 * ( 1993 ) 3 . s. catani , g. turnock and b. r. webber , phys . b * 272 * ( 1991 ) 368 . s. j. burby and e. w. glover , jhep * 0104 * ( 2001 ) 029 [ hep - ph/0101226 ] . y. l. dokshitzer , a. lucenti , g. marchesini and g. p. salam , jhep * 9801 * ( 1998 ) 011 [ hep - ph/9801324 ] . s. catani and b. r. webber , phys . b * 427 * ( 1998 ) 377 [ hep - ph/9801350 ] . g. dissertori and m. schmelling , phys . b * 361 * ( 1995 ) 167 . a. banfi , g. p. salam and g. zanderighi , jhep * 0201 * ( 2002 ) 018 [ hep - ph/0112156 ] . y. l. dokshitzer and d. diakonov , phys . b * 84 * ( 1979 ) 234 . g. parisi and r. petronzio , nucl . b * 154 * ( 1979 ) 427 . j. kodaira and l. trentadue , phys . b * 123 * ( 1983 ) 335 . j. c. collins and d. e. soper , phys . * 48 * ( 1982 ) 655 . p. e. rakow and b. r. webber , nucl . b * 187 * ( 1981 ) 254 . y. l. dokshitzer , g. marchesini and b. r. webber , jhep * 9907 * ( 1999 ) 012 [ hep - ph/9905339 ] . c. f. berger , t. kucs and g. sterman , phys . d * 68 * ( 2003 ) 014012 [ hep - ph/0303051 ] . a. banfi , y. l. dokshitzer , g. marchesini and g. zanderighi , jhep * 0105 * ( 2001 ) 040 [ hep - ph/0104162 ] . v. antonelli , m. dasgupta and g. p. salam , jhep * 0002 * ( 2000 ) 001 [ hep - ph/9912488 ] . m. dasgupta and g. p. salam , eur . j. c * 24 * ( 2002 ) 213 [ hep - ph/0110213 ] . r. bonciani , s. catani , m. l. mangano and p. nason , phys . b * 575 * ( 2003 ) 268 [ hep - ph/0307035 ] . e. gardi and j. rathsman , nucl . b * 609 * ( 2001 ) 123 [ hep - ph/0103217 ] . e. gardi and l. magnea , `` the c parameter distribution in e+ e- annihilation , '' jhep * 0308 * ( 2003 ) 030 [ hep - ph/0306094 ] . f. krauss and g. rodrigo , phys . b * 576 * ( 2003 ) 135 [ hep - ph/0303038 ] . s. catani and b. r. webber , jhep * 9710 * ( 1997 ) 005 [ hep - ph/9710333 ] . m. dasgupta and g. p. salam , jhep * 0203 * ( 2002 ) 017 [ hep - ph/0203009 ] ; c. f. berger , t. kucs and g. sterman , phys . d * 65 * ( 2002 ) 094031 [ hep - ph/0110004 ] ; a. banfi , g. marchesini and g. smye , jhep * 0208 * ( 2002 ) 006 [ hep - ph/0206076 ] . r. b. appleby and m. h. seymour , jhep * 0212 * ( 2002 ) 063 [ hep - ph/0211426 ] ; r. b. appleby and m. h. seymour , jhep * 0309 * ( 2003 ) 056 [ hep - ph/0308086 ] . y. l. dokshitzer and g. marchesini , jhep * 0303 * ( 2003 ) 040 [ hep - ph/0303101 ] . m. dasgupta , hep - ph/0304086 ; r. b. appleby and g. p. salam , hep - ph/0305232 . h. weigert , hep - ph/0312050 . i. h. park _ et al . _ ( amy collaboration ) , phys . lett . * 62 * ( 1989 ) 1713 ; + y. k. li _ et al . _ ( amy collaboration ) , phys . * d 41 * ( 1990 ) 2675 ; + h. j. behrend _ et al . _ ( cello collaboration ) , z. phys . * c44 * ( 1989 ) 63 ; + d. bender _ et al . _ ( hrs collaboration ) , phys . * d 31 * ( 1985 ) 1 ; + d. p. barber _ et al . _ ( mark j collaboration ) , phys . * 43 * ( 1979 ) 830 ; + a. petersen _ et al . _ ( mark ii collaboration ) , phys . d 37 * ( 1988 ) 1 ; + s. bethke _ et al . _ ( mark ii collaboration ) , z. phys . * c43 * ( 1989 ) 325 ; + c. berger _ ( pluto collaboration ) , z. phys . * c12 * ( 1982 ) 297 ; + w. braunschweig _ et al . _ ( tasso collaboration ) , phys . * b214 * ( 1988 ) 286 ; + w. braunschweig _ et al . _ ( tasso collaboration ) , z. phys . * c45 * ( 1989 ) 11 ; + w. braunschweig _ et al . _ ( tasso collaboration ) , z. phys . * c47 * ( 1990 ) 187 ; + i. adachi _ et al . _ ( topaz collaboration ) , phys . * b227 * ( 1989 ) 495 ; + k. nagai _ et al . _ ( topaz collaboration ) , phys . * b278 * ( 1992 ) 506 ; + y. ohnishi _ et al . _ ( topaz collaboration ) , phys . * b313 * ( 1993 ) 475 . d. decamp _ et al . _ [ aleph collaboration ] , phys . b * 255 * , 623 ( 1991 ) . d. decamp _ et al . _ [ aleph collaboration ] , phys . b * 284 * , 163 ( 1992 ) . d. buskulic _ et al . _ [ aleph collaboration ] , z. phys . c * 73 * ( 1997 ) 409 . r. barate _ [ aleph collaboration ] , phys . * 294 * ( 1998 ) 1 . aleph collaboration , `` qcd measurements in @xmath0 annihilations at centre - of - mass energies between 189 and 202 gev '' , aleph 2000 - 044 conf 2000 - 027 . p. abreu _ et al . _ [ delphi collaboration ] , z. phys . c * 73 * , 229 ( 1997 ) . p. abreu _ et al . _ [ delphi collaboration ] , phys . b * 456 * , 322 ( 1999 ) . p. abreu _ et al . _ [ delphi collaboration ] , eur . j. c * 14 * , 557 ( 2000 ) [ hep - ex/0002026 ] . j. abdallah _ et al . _ [ delphi collaboration ] , eur . j. c * 29 * ( 2003 ) 285 [ hep - ex/0307048 ] . o. adriani _ et al . _ [ l3 collaboration ] , phys . b * 284 * , 471 ( 1992 ) . b. adeva _ et al . _ [ l3 collaboration ] , z. phys . c * 55 * ( 1992 ) 39 . o. adriani _ et al . _ [ l3 collaboration ] , phys . rept . * 236 * , 1 ( 1993 ) . m. acciarri _ et al . _ [ l3 collaboration ] , phys . b * 411 * , 339 ( 1997 ) . m. acciarri _ et al . _ [ l3 collaboration ] , phys . b * 371 * , 137 ( 1996 ) . m. acciarri _ et al . _ [ l3 collaboration ] , phys . b * 404 * , 390 ( 1997 ) . m. acciarri _ et al . _ [ l3 collaboration ] , phys . b * 444 * , 569 ( 1998 ) . m. acciarri _ et al . _ [ l3 collaboration ] , phys . b * 489 * , 65 ( 2000 ) [ hep - ex/0005045 ] . p. achard _ et al . _ [ l3 collaboration ] , phys . b * 536 * ( 2002 ) 217 [ hep - ex/0206052 ] . p. d. acton _ et al . _ [ opal collaboration ] , z. phys . c * 55 * ( 1992 ) 1 . d. acton _ et al . _ [ opal collaboration ] , z. phys . c * 59 * , 1 ( 1993 ) . g. alexander _ et al . _ [ opal collaboration ] , z. phys . c * 72 * , 191 ( 1996 ) . k. ackerstaff _ et al . _ [ opal collaboration ] , z. phys . c * 75 * , 193 ( 1997 ) . g. abbiendi _ et al . _ [ opal collaboration ] , eur . j. c * 16 * ( 2000 ) 185 [ hep - ex/0002012 ] . p. a. movilla fernandez , o. biebel , s. bethke , s. kluth and p. pfeifenschneider [ jade collaboration ] , eur . j. c * 1 * , 461 ( 1998 ) [ hep - ex/9708034 ] . o. biebel , p. a. movilla fernandez and s. bethke [ jade collaboration ] , phys . b * 459 * , 326 ( 1999 ) [ hep - ex/9903009 ] . p. pfeifenschneider _ et al . _ [ jade collaboration ] , eur . j. c * 17 * , 19 ( 2000 ) [ hep - ex/0001055 ] . p. a. movilla fernandez , s. bethke , o. biebel and s. kluth , eur . j. c * 22 * ( 2001 ) 1 [ hep - ex/0105059 ] . s. kluth , m. blumenstengel , p. a. movilla fernandez , s. bethke , o. biebel , c. pahl and j. schieck [ jade collaboration ] , hep - ex/0305023 . j. schieck [ for the opal collaboration ] , hep - ex/0312036 . f. yuasa _ et al . _ , prog . * 138 * ( 2000 ) 18 [ hep - ph/0007053 ] . a. pukhov _ et al . _ , hep - ph/9908288 . f. krauss , r. kuhn and g. soff , jhep * 0202 * ( 2002 ) 044 [ hep - ph/0109036 ] . c. adloff _ et al . _ [ h1 collaboration ] , phys . b * 406 * ( 1997 ) 256 [ hep - ex/9706002 ] . c. adloff _ et al . _ [ h1 collaboration ] , eur . j. c * 14 * ( 2000 ) 255 [ addendum - ibid . c * 18 * ( 2000 ) 417 ] [ hep - ex/9912052 ] . h. u. martyn [ h1 collaboration ] , hep - ex/0010046 . s. chekanov _ et al . _ [ zeus collaboration ] , eur . j. c * 27 * ( 2003 ) 531 [ hep - ex/0211040 ] . j. breitweg _ et al . _ [ zeus collaboration ] , phys . b * 421 * ( 1998 ) 368 [ hep - ex/9710027 ] . b. r. webber , nucl . * 71 * ( 1999 ) 66 [ hep - ph/9712236 ] . a. v. manohar and m. b. wise , phys . b * 344 * ( 1995 ) 407 [ hep - ph/9406392 ] . g. p. korchemsky and g. sterman , nucl . b * 437 * ( 1995 ) 415 [ hep - ph/9411211 ] . g. p. korchemsky and g. sterman , hep - ph/9505391 . g. p. korchemsky and g. sterman , nucl . b * 555 * ( 1999 ) 335 [ hep - ph/9902341 ] . g. p. korchemsky and s. tafat , jhep * 0010 * ( 2000 ) 010 [ hep - ph/0007005 ] . b. r. webber , phys . b * 339 * ( 1994 ) 148 [ hep - ph/9408222 ] . y. l. dokshitzer and b. r. webber , phys . b * 352 * ( 1995 ) 451 [ hep - ph/9504219 ] . y. l. dokshitzer , g. marchesini and b. r. webber , nucl . b * 469 * ( 1996 ) 93 [ hep - ph/9512336 ] . r. akhoury and v. i. zakharov , phys . b * 357 * ( 1995 ) 646 [ hep - ph/9504248 ] . y. l. dokshitzer , a. lucenti , g. marchesini and g. p. salam , nucl . b * 511 * ( 1998 ) 396 [ erratum - ibid . b * 593 * ( 2001 ) 729 ] [ hep - ph/9707532 ] . y. l. dokshitzer , g. marchesini and g. p. salam , eur . j. directc * 1 * ( 1999 ) 3 [ hep - ph/9812487 ] . m. dasgupta , l. magnea and g. smye , jhep * 9911 * ( 1999 ) 025 [ hep - ph/9911316 ] . g. e. smye , jhep * 0105 * ( 2001 ) 005 [ hep - ph/0101323 ] . e. gardi and g. grunberg , jhep * 9911 * ( 1999 ) 016 [ hep - ph/9908458 ] . e. gardi , jhep * 0004 * ( 2000 ) 030 [ hep - ph/0003179 ] . c. w. bauer , a. v. manohar and m. b. wise , phys . * 91 * ( 2003 ) 122001 [ hep - ph/0212255 ] . z. trocsanyi , jhep * 0001 * ( 2000 ) 014 [ hep - ph/9911353 ] . m. dasgupta and b. r. webber , eur . j. c * 1 * ( 1998 ) 539 [ hep - ph/9704297 ] . m. dasgupta and b. r. webber , jhep * 9810 * ( 1998 ) 001 [ hep - ph/9809247 ] . g. p. salam and z. trcsnyi , _ limited automated predictor of power suppressed effects ( lappse ) _ , unpublished work . b. r. webber , hep - ph/9510283 . y. l. dokshitzer , `` why it seems too early to report on status of qcd , '' _ given at international school of subnuclear physics : 31th course : from supersymmetry to the origin of space - time , erice , italy , 4 - 12 jul 1993 _ j. m. campbell , e. w. n. glover and c. j. maxwell , phys . * 81 * ( 1998 ) 1568 [ hep - ph/9803254 ] . d. t. barclay , c. j. maxwell and m. t. reader , phys . d * 49 * ( 1994 ) 3480 . m. beneke , phys . b * 307 * ( 1993 ) 154 . p. abreu _ et al . _ ( delphi collaboration ) , z. phys . * c73 * ( 1996 ) 11 . d. buskulic _ et al . _ ( aleph collaboration ) , z. phys . * c55 * ( 1992 ) 209 . i. g. knowles _ , `` qcd event generators , '' hep - ph/9601212 . s. frixione and b. r. webber , jhep * 0206 * ( 2002 ) 029 [ hep - ph/0204244 ] . s. frixione , p. nason and b. r. webber , jhep * 0308 * ( 2003 ) 007 [ hep - ph/0305252 ] . s. gieseke , a. ribon , m. h. seymour , p. stephens and b. webber , hep - ph/0311208 . lep qcd working group , work in progress . h. stenzel , hep - ex/0309061 . s. bethke , nucl . * 121 * ( 2003 ) 74 [ hep - ex/0211012 ] . k. hagiwara _ et al . _ [ particle data group collaboration ] , phys . rev . d * 66 * ( 2002 ) 010001 . r. w. l. jones , m. ford , g. p. salam , h. stenzel and d. wicke , jhep * 0312 * ( 2003 ) 007 [ hep - ph/0312016 ] . p. m. stevenson , phys . d * 23 * ( 1981 ) 2916 . g. grunberg , phys . d * 29 * ( 1984 ) 2315 . s. j. brodsky , g. p. lepage and p. b. mackenzie , phys . d * 28 * ( 1983 ) 228 . p. abreu _ et al . _ [ delphi collaboration ] , phys . b * 418 * ( 1998 ) 430 . g. abbiendi _ et al . _ [ opal collaboration ] , eur . j. c * 21 * ( 2001 ) 411 [ hep - ex/0105046 ] . a. brandenburg , p. n. burrows , d. muller , n. oishi and p. uwer , phys . b * 468 * ( 1999 ) 168 [ hep - ph/9905495 ] . r. barate _ [ aleph collaboration ] , eur . j. c * 18 * ( 2000 ) 1 [ hep - ex/0008013 ] . p. bambade , m. j. coster , j. fuster and p. tortosa , delphi conference note 2003 - 022-conf-642 ( unpublished ) . w. bernreuther , a. brandenburg and p. uwer , phys . * 79 * ( 1997 ) 189 [ hep - ph/9703305 ] . g. rodrigo , a. santamaria and m. s. bilenky , phys . * 79 * ( 1997 ) 193 [ hep - ph/9703358 ] . p. nason and c. oleari , nucl . b * 521 * ( 1998 ) 237 [ hep - ph/9709360 ] . p. a. movilla fernandez , hep - ex/0209022 . t. kluge , hep - ex/0310063 . g. p. salam and g. zanderighi , nucl . * 86 * ( 2000 ) 430 [ hep - ph/9909324 ] . a. heister _ et al . _ [ aleph collaboration ] , eur . j. c * 27 * ( 2003 ) 1 . g. abbiendi _ et al . _ [ opal collaboration ] , eur . j. c * 20 * ( 2001 ) 601 [ hep - ex/0101044 ] . p. abreu _ et al . _ [ delphi collaboration ] , eur . j. c * 13 * ( 2000 ) 573 . g. abbiendi _ et al . _ [ opal collaboration ] , eur . j. c * 23 * ( 2002 ) 597 [ hep - ex/0111013 ] . g. p. korchemsky , hep - ph/9806537 . g. sterman , nucl . b * 281 * ( 1987 ) 310 ; + s. catani and l. trentadue , nucl . b * 327 * ( 1989 ) 323 ; + s. catani and l. trentadue , nucl . b * 353 * ( 1991 ) 183 ; + g. p. korchemsky , mod . lett . a * 4 * ( 1989 ) 1257 ; + g. p. korchemsky and g. marchesini , phys . b * 313 * ( 1993 ) 433 ; + i. i. y. bigi , m. a. shifman , n. g. uraltsev and a. i. vainshtein , int . j. mod . phys . a * 9 * ( 1994 ) 2467 [ hep - ph/9312359 ] ; + r. d. dikeman , m. a. shifman and n. g. uraltsev , int . j. mod . a * 11 * ( 1996 ) 571 [ hep - ph/9505397 ] ; + m. neubert , phys . d * 49 * ( 1994 ) 3392 [ hep - ph/9311325 ] ; + m. neubert , phys . d * 49 * ( 1994 ) 4623 [ hep - ph/9312311 ] ; + g. p. korchemsky and g. sterman , phys . b * 340 * ( 1994 ) 96 [ hep - ph/9407344 ] ; + a. g. grozin and g. p. korchemsky , phys . d * 53 * ( 1996 ) 1378 [ hep - ph/9411323 ] . m. cacciari and e. gardi , nucl . b * 664 * ( 2003 ) 299 [ hep - ph/0301047 ] . g. bozzi , s. catani , d. de florian and m. grazzini , phys . b * 564 * ( 2003 ) 65 [ hep - ph/0302104 ] . l. magnea , hep - ph/0211013 . Abstract:

Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.

Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered . Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video . Paper: strongly correlated fermionic systems , responsible for relevant many - body phenomena such as high - temperature superconductivity , the fractional quantum hall effect or metal - insulator transitions , represent one of the most important theoretical challenges in condensed matter physics . among the simplest possible models of interacting fermions in a 2d lattice is the hubbard model,@xcite which is believed to be one of the keys to understanding the theoretical riddle of high - temperature superconductivity,@xcite and which serves as a good example to illustrate the nature and scale of the difficulties encountered . in spite of a titanic effort by the condensed matter community spanning several decades , still today the phase diagram of the 2d hubbard model and its relation to high - temperature superconductors remain highly controversial . in the absence of exactly solvable models , accurate numerical simulations are essential in order to gain further insight into the physics of strongly correlated systems . while quantum monte carlo ( qmc ) techniques are very powerful in simulating bosonic systems , they suffer from the so - called _ negative sign problem _ in the case of fermionic and frustrated models . @xcite on the other hand , generic 1d lattice systems can be accurately addressed with the density matrix renormalization group ( dmrg ) method , @xcite but this approach scales inefficiently with the lattice size in 2d systems . recent progress in the simulation of 2d fermionic models has been made with a variety of methods . @xcite however , results obtained with different methods are often inconsistent , highlighting the need for further improvement and for alternative approaches . a promising new route to studying strongly correlated fermion systems in a 2d lattice , presently under intense investigation , @xcite is based on using a _ tensor network _ as ground state variational ansatz . for bosonic ( e.g. spin ) 2d lattice models , tensor network anstze include _ projected entangled - pair states _ ( peps ) for inhomogeneous@xcite and homogeneous systems , @xcite and the _ _ multi - scale entanglement renormalization ansatz__@xcite ( mera ) . [ homogeneous peps are also known with names such as ( vertex ) _ _ tensor product states__@xcite ] . the interest in these approaches resides in the fact that they manage to retain some of the useful features of dmrg and qmc , while avoiding their main shortcomings . indeed , peps and mera approaches are free from the negative sign problem that prevents the application of qmc to fermionic and frustrated models . at the same time , and unlike dmrg , both peps and mera can efficiently represent ground states of 2d lattice models . in addition , compared to other variational approaches , peps and mera are relatively unbiased towards specific ground states . still at an early stage of development , the major limitation of these methods is that the cost of simulations increases sharply with the amount of entanglement in the ground state . this limits the range of models that can be analyzed accurately at present . nevertheless , several systems of frustrated antiferromagnets beyond the reach of dmrg and qmc have already been addressed.@xcite in recent months , generalizations of tensor network algorithms to fermionic systems have been put forward independently by several groups.@xcite as a result , it is now possible to study interacting fermions in 2d lattices both within the context of the mera @xcite and peps . @xcite the fundamental new step , common in all the proposals , is to incorporate the fermionic character of the ground state wave function directly into the ansatz . this is accomplished by considering a _ network of fermionic operators _ , that is , a set of linear maps , made of anticommuting operators , that are connected according to a network pattern , as first proposed in refs . for the mera and in ref . for the peps . in actual computations , one is still forced to store and manipulate tensors ( i.e. multi - dimensional arrays of coefficients ) corresponding e.g. to the expansion coefficients of the fermionic maps . the process of ` _ _ fermionization _ _ ' of a tensor network algorithm , i.e. its extension to fermionic systems , can in practice be achieved and visualized in a variety of ( ultimately equivalent ) ways , depending on how the underlying network of fermionic operators is translated into a set of tensors and rules for their manipulation . examples include the use of a jordan - wigner transformation , @xcite or the introduction of additional bond indices between tensors.@xcite a particularly simple form of ` _ _ fermionization _ _ ' of tensor networks was introduced in ref . , where it was applied in the context of the mera . we emphasize that ref . is based on reformulating previous work by corboz , evenbly , verstraete and vidal on fermionic mera,@xcite which in turn had its origins in a key observation by verstraete.@xcite the fermionization procedure of ref . , which applies to any tensor network , is remarkedly simple . it does not require the introduction of a jordan - wigner transformation in the bond indices , or to have to explicitly keep track and dynamically modify a global fermionic order ; neither does it require the introduction of additional bond indices in the tensors . instead , the fermionic character of the tensor network is engraved in two simple rules : ( i ) use of parity invariant tensors and ( ii ) replacement of line crossings with so - called fermionic swap gates . the net result of applying these rules is a modified variational ansatz that can be manipulated using standard tensor network operations ( tensor multiplications , etc . ) , thus producing a straightforward fermionic version of existing tensor network algorithms . importantly , the computational cost of bosonic and fermionic algorithms scales in the same way with the amount of entanglement in the ground state . @xcite this remarkable result was also independently derived in ref . . this paper has two main goals . the first is to explain how to obtain peps algorithms for fermionic systems by applying the above ` _ _ fermionization _ _ ' rules to existing bosonic peps algorithms . fermionic peps were originally proposed by kraus , schuch , verstraete and cirac in ref . and have also been discussed by barthel , pineda and eisert in ref . . our formulation of fermionic peps must be , at some level , equivalent to those proposals . however , the present formulation , which is based on previous independent work,@xcite is remarkably straightforward and appears to be comparatively much simpler . in particular , it allowed us to numerically implement a fermionic peps algorithm for infinite systems by only introducing a small number of changes to existing code for bosonic systems . a second main goal of this paper is to demonstrate the usefulness of fermionic peps . in spite of the several existing formulations of fermionic peps , @xcite and with the exception of ref . , where some qualitative results are reported for the @xmath0 model , no evidence has been presented yet showing that fermionic peps are a good variational ansatz for interacting fermion systems . [ notice , however , that ref . shows that gaussian fermionic peps can represent states of non - interacting fermions ] . here we do present such evidence , in the form of ground state computations for several 2d models . specifically , we use a fermionic version of the infinite peps ( ipeps ) algorithm@xcite to address models on an infinite square lattice . first , results for free spinless fermions are compared with the corresponding exact solution , showing that a peps with small bond dimension is capable of reproducing the ground state energy with several digits of accuracy . then a model of interacting spinless fermions is addressed . qualitatively , the simulation reproduces the phase diagram predicted within hartree - fock , with metal and charge - density wave phases separated by a line of first order phase transitions . at a quantitative level , however , we obtain ground state energies that are lower than those obtained with hartree - fock , and this shifts the boundary between phases significantly . finally , for the @xmath0 model , we obtain ground state energies that are close to those of a specialized gutziller - projected ansatz . the rest of the paper is organized as follows : sec . [ sec : peps ] reviews the peps formalism for bosonic systems and the general fermionization procedure of tensor networks introduced in ref . , which is then applied to peps algorithms . [ sec : ctm ] considers in more detail the fermionic version of the ipeps algorithm for infinite 2d lattices , which was employed to obtain the benchmark results presented in this paper [ sec : results ] describes ground state calculations for systems of free and interacting fermions in an infinite 2d lattice . [ sec : conclusions ] contains some conclusions , while appendix [ app : genoperators ] defines generalized fermionic operators and appendix [ app : twosite ] describes in detail one step of the update in the fermionic ipeps algorithm . _ note on terminology. _ for the purposes of this paper , a _ tensor _ is simply a multi - dimensional array of complex coefficients , and a _ tensor network _ is a set of tensors some of whose indices are connected according to a network pattern , where being connected means that there is a sum or trace over that index , in the sense of tensor multiplication . accordingly , in this paper a bosonic / fermionic tensor network is a tensor network used in the context of simulating a bosonic / fermionic system . thus , in the present formulation a fermionic peps is simply a `` tensor network that serves as a variational ansatz for fermionic systems '' . it is different from a bosonic peps in the presence of special gates called fermionic swap gates ( and in that its tensors are necessarily parity preserving ) . in particular , even though the rules used to create a fermionic tensor network , as introduced in ref . and reviewed here , were obtained by studying how to mimic a network of fermionic operators ( that is , of operators that obey anticommuting relations ) , here a fermionic peps is _ not _ a network of fermionic operators . one of the merits of the present formulation is precisely that it replaces the considerable complexity involved in dealing with a network of fermionic operators with a simple set of rules . in particular , it avoids having to explicitly define , keep track and dynamically modify a fermionic order for the bond indices . the equivalence between our formulation of a fermionic tensor network and a network of fermionic operators was already established in ref . for the case of the mera . a general derivation of this equivalence would distract from the purpose of this paper and will be presented elsewhere . the goal of this section is to introduce a fermionic version of bosonic peps algorithms,@xcite so that they can be applied to simulate fermionic systems in a 2d lattice . we start by reviewing some key aspects of the peps formalism for bosonic systems . this allows us to introduce the notation and the diagrammatic representation of tensors used throughout secs . [ sec : peps ] and [ sec : ctm ] . then we describe the fermionization rules of ref . , which we also extensively review . we apply these rules to obtain a fermionic peps ansatz ( see also refs . ) , and provide a discussion of how fermionic peps algorithms can be obtained by modifying existing bosonic peps algorithms . let us consider a quantum many - body system in a lattice @xmath1 made of @xmath2 sites , labelled by an integer @xmath3 . each site @xmath4 is described by a complex vector space @xmath5 of finite dimension @xmath6 , with basis states @xmath7 . the vector space @xmath5 could represent , for instance , the possible states of a quantum spin sitting on that site of @xmath1 . the system is further characterized by a _ local _ ( _ bosonic _ ) hamiltonian . this is a hermitian operator @xmath8 that ( when expressed in terms of bosonic operators , i.e. operators that commute when acting on different sites ) decomposes as a sum of terms each involving only a small number of sites . let @xmath9 be a pure state , @xmath10 where index @xmath11 labels a basis on site @xmath4 . a task of interest is to compute a specific state @xmath12 somehow related to @xmath13 , e.g. its ground state , and to evaluate the expectation value @xmath14 of some local observable @xmath15 . however , representing a vector @xmath16 requires a number of complex coefficients @xmath17 that grows exponentially in @xmath2 . this poses a serious computational challenge . exact diagonalization techniques are only affordable for small systems ( e.g. , at most @xmath18 for @xmath19 ) , and alternative numerical strategies are required to analyze large systems . projected entangled - pair states@xcite ( peps ) were introduced as a means to obtain an efficient description for some states @xmath16 of a 2d lattice @xmath1 . for concreteness , in this work we consider the case of a square lattice , although all the discussions can be extended to other type of lattices . to each site @xmath20 there corresponds a vector of integers @xmath21 , and we also write @xmath22 to denote a site of lattice @xmath1 . a peps is made of a collection of @xmath2 tensors @xmath23}\}$ ] , one for each site @xmath24 , connected through _ bond indices _ that follow the pattern of links of the lattice @xmath1 . upon tracing over all bond indices , a peps yields a tensor @xmath25 with the @xmath26 complex coefficients @xmath17 of a state @xmath27 . with coefficients @xmath28 for a state @xmath29 of a @xmath30 square lattice this tensor is expressed in terms of a peps made of a set of 9 tensors @xmath31}\}$ ] , one for each site @xmath32 . ( b ) bulk tensor @xmath33}$ ] with components @xmath33}_{ulsdr}$ ] . notice that the legs corresponding to indices @xmath34 , @xmath35 , @xmath36 , @xmath6 and @xmath37 emerge from the circle in anti - clockwise order . ( c ) hermitian conjugate @xmath33\dagger}$ ] of the peps tensor @xmath33}$ ] , represented as its mirror image . notice that the legs corresponding to indices @xmath37 , @xmath6 , @xmath36 , @xmath35 and @xmath34 of @xmath38\dagger})_{rdslu}$ ] emerge again in anti - clockwise order . ( d ) hermitian conjugates of @xmath25 and its peps representation.,width=302 ] throughout this paper a diagrammatic representation of tensors and tensor networks is used , see fig . [ fig : bosonpeps ] . each tensor is depicted as a shape ( circle , square , diamond , etc ) and its indices as emerging lines . a line connecting two shapes ( or starting and ending at the same shape ) denotes an index over which a trace is taken . as an example , fig . [ fig : bosonpeps](a ) represents , in the case of a lattice @xmath1 made of @xmath30 sites , a tensor @xmath25 with 9 indices , corresponding to the coefficients @xmath39 of @xmath40 , followed by a peps made of 9 tensors @xmath31}\}$ ] . the number of indices in a tensor @xmath33}$ ] depends on the number of nearest neighbors of site @xmath22 , with tensors in the bulk having more indices than tensors at a boundary . specifically , a bulk tensor has components @xmath33}_{ulsdr}$ ] , with one _ physical _ index @xmath36 and four _ bond _ indices @xmath41 . the physical index @xmath36 labels the basis of the vector space @xmath5 for site @xmath24 and therefore takes @xmath6 different values , whereas each bond index connects the tensor with a tensor in a nearest neighbor site and ranges from @xmath42 to @xmath43 , where @xmath43 is the so - called _ bond dimension _ of the peps . correspondingly , a bulk peps tensor is represented by a circle with five legs , see fig . [ fig : bosonpeps](b ) . as in the rest of the paper , here we follow the prescription that the indices of a tensor are drawn in anti - clockwise order . notice also that the open indices of the peps in fig . [ fig : bosonpeps](a ) reach the exterior of the tensor network in exactly the same ( anti - clockwise ) order that they appear in @xmath44 . these notational and diagrammatical details are somewhat superfluous in the bosonic case ( since one can change the order of indices in a tensor by simply permuting its components ) but will become important in the extension to fermions . a peps on a @xmath45 lattice , where @xmath46 , contains @xmath47 bulk tensors , each depending on @xmath48 complex coefficients . therefore the peps is characterized by @xmath49 parameters . if @xmath43 has a fixed value independent of @xmath2 , then the peps is indeed an efficient encoding of some states @xmath16 , and it can be used e.g. as a variational ansatz for the ground state of @xmath13 . however , for the peps to be a useful ansatz , we also need to provide an efficient strategy to optimize its tensors and manipulate them in order to extract physically relevant information , as discussed next . two major tasks to be accomplished with a peps algorithm@xcite are : ( i ) optimization of its @xmath49 parameters so as to obtain a good approximation to e.g. the ground state of the local hamiltonian @xmath13 ; ( ii ) given a peps for a state @xmath12 , computation of expectation values @xmath14 of local observables @xmath15 , as given by @xmath50 these two tasks happen to be closely related . they involve taking the trace over all the bond indices of a composite tensor network , an operation referred to as _ contracting _ the tensor network . written in terms of tensors @xmath25 and @xmath51 . ( b ) the same scalar product , but written in terms of a peps together with its hermitian conjugate . ( c)-(d ) using the jump move of fig . [ fig : jump ] , this tensor network can be modified so that each tensor @xmath33}$ ] is drawn next to its hermitian conjugate @xmath33}$ ] . ( e ) tensor network @xmath52 in terms of reduced tensors @xmath53}$ ] . ( f ) @xmath53}$ ] defined in terms of @xmath33}$ ] and @xmath33\dagger}$ ] , eq . .,width=302 ] an emblematic example of tensor network contraction required in a peps algorithm concerns the computation of the scalar product @xmath54 . we need to introduce a few more definitions and notation . let @xmath55 denote the hermitian conjugate of a tensor @xmath56 , obtained by reversing the order of the indices of @xmath56 and taking the complex conjugate of each of its coefficients ( and diagrammatically represented as the mirror image of @xmath56 ) . for instance , tensor @xmath51 in fig . [ fig : bosonpeps](d ) , corresponding to @xmath57 , @xmath58 has coefficients @xmath59 fig . [ fig : bosonpeps](c ) represents the hermitian conjugate @xmath33\dagger}$ ] of a bulk tensor @xmath33}$ ] , which has coefficients @xmath60\dagger})_{rdslu } = { a^{[\vec{r}]}_{ulsdr}}^*.\ ] ] we build the hermitian conjugate of the peps for @xmath25 as the set of tensors @xmath31\dagger}\}$ ] connected according to the mirror image of the network of connections in the peps for @xmath25 , see fig . [ fig : bosonpeps](d ) . for each site @xmath22 , let us define the reduced tensor @xmath53}$ ] in terms of tensor @xmath33}$ ] and @xmath33\dagger}$ ] by tracing over the physical index @xmath36 . for instance , in the bulk , the reduced tensor @xmath53}$ ] has components @xmath61}_{u \bar{u } l \bar{l } \bar{d } d \bar{r } r } \equiv \sum_{s=1}^d a^{[\vec{r}]}_{ulsdr } ( a^{[\vec{r}]\dagger})_{\bar{r } \bar{d } s \bar{l } \bar{u } } , \label{eq : a}\ ] ] see fig . [ fig : bosonscalar](f ) . then the scalar product @xmath54 results from contracting a tensor network @xmath52 that consists of all reduced tensors @xmath53}$ ] connected according to the links in @xmath1 , see fig . [ fig : bosonscalar](a)-(e ) , where the ( trivial ) jump move of fig . [ fig : jump ] is used . contracting the tensor network @xmath52 to obtain the scalar product @xmath54 comes with a cost that grows exponentially in the linear size @xmath62 of lattice @xmath1 , and therefore can not be accomplished efficiently . a key ingredient of peps algorithms is precisely a strategy to _ efficiently _ but approximately contract the tensor network @xmath52 , thus producing an approximation to @xmath54 . this can be done in several ways , depending on the size and topology of lattice @xmath1 . in a finite lattice with open boundary conditions , one can use matrix product state ( mps ) techniques . @xcite in the case of a torus , coarse - graining techniques known as _ tensor entanglement renormalization group _ ( terg ) @xcite can be used . finally , in an infinite lattice , both infinite mps@xcite and _ corner transfer matrix _ ( ctm)@xcite techniques have been employed . in order to optimize a peps so as to approximate the ground state of @xmath13 , as well as to evaluate the expectation value of local observables , it is useful to contract certain class of tensor networks called _ environments_. the environment @xmath63}$ ] of a site @xmath22 is the tensor network obtained from @xmath52 by removing tensor @xmath53}$ ] , and can be used to compute the expectation value of a local observable acting on that site . , made of reduced tensors @xmath53}$ ] , corresponding to the scalar product @xmath54 in an @xmath45 lattice @xmath1 with open boundary conditions . ( b ) environment @xmath64}$ ] for two contiguous sites @xmath65 , obtained from @xmath52 by removing tensors @xmath66}$ ] and @xmath67}$ ] . ( c ) approximate environment @xmath68}$ ] consisting of six tensors @xmath69 . ( d ) tensor @xmath70 of coefficients for a two - site local operator @xmath15 , eq . . ( e ) tensor network made of the approximate environment @xmath68}$ ] and tensors @xmath71}$ ] , @xmath71\dagger}$ ] , @xmath72}$ ] , @xmath72\dagger}$ ] and @xmath70 . its contraction produces an approximation to @xmath73.,width=321 ] similarly , a two - site environment @xmath64}$ ] is the tensor network obtained by removing tensors @xmath66}$ ] and @xmath67}$ ] from @xmath52 , and can be used e.g. to compute the expectation value of a two - site observable @xmath74 acting on sites @xmath75 . figure [ fig : bosonenv](b ) shows the environment @xmath64}$ ] corresponding to two nearest neighbor sites @xmath76 . again , the exact contraction of the environment can not be performed efficiently , but efficient schemes , analogous to those employed to contract @xmath52 , can be used in order to approximately contract @xmath77}$ ] . the whole environment is in this way approximated by a smaller tensor network @xmath68}$ ] made of 6 tensors @xmath78 , see fig . [ fig : bosonenv](c ) . these tensors can then be connected to tensors @xmath71}$ ] , @xmath71\dagger}$ ] , @xmath72}$ ] , @xmath72\dagger}$ ] and @xmath70 to produce an approximation to @xmath73 , see fig . [ fig : bosonenv](e ) . in a system with a hamiltonian @xmath13 made of two - site interactions @xmath79}$ ] between nearest neighbors , the approximate environment @xmath68}$ ] is particularly useful . on the one hand , it is employed in the optimization of tensors @xmath71}$ ] and @xmath72}$ ] after a gate has been applied on the two sites , as part of simulating an _ imaginary - time evolution _ according to @xmath13 , @xmath80 which offers one way of obtaining a peps approximation to the ground state @xmath81 of @xmath13 . on the other hand , @xmath82}$ ] can also be used to compute the expectation value of the energy on that link , @xmath83 } { \mbox{$| \psi \rangle$}}$ ] , as part of an algorithm to optimize the peps by minimizing its energy , @xmath84}\ } } \frac { { \mbox{$\langle \psi_{\{a^{[\vec{r}]}\ } } |$}}~ \hat{h}~ { \mbox{$| \psi_{\{a^{[\vec{r}]}\ } } \rangle$ } } } { { \mbox{$\langle \psi_{\{a^{[\vec{r}]}\ } } | \psi_{\{a^{[\vec{r}]}\ } } \rangle$ } } } \label{eq : mine}\ ] ] which is another way of obtaining a peps approximation to the ground state @xmath81 of @xmath13 . we refer to refs . for more details . other peps algorithms@xcite bypass the computation of environments . this concludes our short review of peps algorithms for bosonic 2d lattice models . let us now consider a fermionic lattice system . for the sake of simplicity , we first assume that each site @xmath20 is described by a complex vector space @xmath5 of dimension @xmath19 that is associated to a fermionic annihilation operator @xmath85 , with anticommutation relations @xmath86 [ we will shortly extend the discussion to sites with vector space of finite dimension @xmath87 , see also appendix [ app : genoperators ] ] . a basis of the vector space @xmath88 of the lattice system is given by @xmath89 recall that fermionic operators can be expressed in terms of pauli matrices @xmath90 by means of a jordan - wigner transformation , @xmath91 the fermionic lattice system @xmath1 is further characterized by a local fermionic hamiltonian @xmath13 . this is a hamiltonian that , when expressed in terms of the fermionic operators @xmath92 , decomposes as the sum of terms involving only a small number of sites . as in eq . , let @xmath16 be a pure state of lattice @xmath1 , @xmath93 here we will assume that @xmath12 is somehow related to the fermionic hamiltonian @xmath13 , for instance it is its ground state . once more , we would like to find a variational ansatz depending on @xmath47 parameters to efficiently encode the tensor @xmath25 containing the @xmath26 coefficients @xmath17 of a pure state @xmath12 . one possibility would be to use a peps exactly as in the bosonic case . however , this might not be a good idea . remember that the label @xmath94 provides an order to the set of sites of @xmath1 , whose position in the lattice is given by @xmath95 . two nearest neighbor sites @xmath96 and @xmath97 on the square lattice might correspond to values @xmath98 and @xmath99 that are far apart . then , when expressed in terms of pauli matrices , the local fermionic hamiltonian @xmath13 will no longer look local . for instance , a nearest neighbor hopping term @xmath100 develops a string of @xmath101 s . this might be harmful in two ways . on the one hand , the presence of strings of @xmath101 s would require important modifications in the algorithms to approximate the ground state of @xmath13 with a peps , either through imaginary - time evolution or energy minimization . on the other hand , it is unclear that the peps itself , which was originally designed as an ansatz for ground states of local bosonic hamiltonians , will be as good an ansatz also for ground states of fermionic hamiltonians , given that the latter are non - local when expressed in bosonic variables . below we will explain how to modify the peps so that it is suitable to study fermionic systems ( see also refs . ) . before , however , we introduce the notation necessary to deal with local vector spaces @xmath5 of dimension @xmath87 . fermionic systems are governed by hamiltonians that preserve the _ parity of the fermionic particle number _ , to which we refer simply as ` _ _ parity _ _ ' . that is , fermions can only be created or annihilated in pairs , and parity is a constant of motion . as a result , we can assume that the pure state @xmath102 of lattice @xmath1 has a well - defined parity , and observables @xmath15 and reduced density matrices are block diagonal in parity . let us consider again the vector space @xmath5 of a single site , now with finite dimension @xmath87 . it is natural to decompose @xmath5 as the direct sum of an even parity subspace @xmath103 and an odd parity subspace @xmath104 , @xmath105 and to choose a basis of vectors with well - defined parity . accordingly , the physical index @xmath36 describing one such basis is decomposed as @xmath106 , where @xmath107 is the parity and @xmath108 ( denoted @xmath109 and @xmath110 ) enumerates the different basis states with parity @xmath111 . the parity operator @xmath112 then acts on this basis as @xmath113 in the case of spinless fermions , with a local dimension @xmath19 , the two possible states of a site are the local vacuum @xmath114 , signaling the absence of a fermion , and the state @xmath115 , corresponding to one fermion . in our notation these states read @xmath116 in the case of the @xmath0 model there are three possible states per site , @xmath117 , where @xmath118 and @xmath119 denote an electron with spin up and spin down , respectively . in our notation these states read @xmath120 finally , in the case of the hubbard model with local dimension @xmath121 there is an additional state , @xmath122 , corresponding to a doubly occupied site , which in our notation reads @xmath123 in analogy with the physical index @xmath106 , we introduce a parity operator also on the bond indices of a peps . accordingly , the tensor @xmath33}_{ulsdr}$ ] has bond indices @xmath124 , etc . this means that e.g. bond index @xmath34 can take values @xmath125 where the bond dimension @xmath43 is given by @xmath126 . the actual values of @xmath127 and @xmath128 can be chosen at convenience . ) ; ( b ) line crossings are replaced with a special gate , a fermionic swap gate @xmath129.,width=264 ] given a peps for bosonic systems , cf . [ fig : bosonpeps](a ) , in this work we obtain a peps for fermionic systems by applying the two rules used in ref . to fermionize the mera . these rules are applied both to the peps and to all related tensor networks that are involved e.g. in optimizing the ansatz or computing expectation values of local observables . * rule 1 : * each tensor @xmath56 in a tensor network is chosen to be _ parity preserving _ , i.e. @xmath130 where @xmath131 denotes the _ parity _ of the basis state labelled by @xmath132 , see fig . [ fig : rules](a ) . * rule 2 : * each crossing of lines in the tensor network is replaced with a _ fermionic swap gate _ @xmath133 , see fig . [ fig : rules](b ) . this gate implements a fermionic exchange and has the form @xmath134with @xmath135 given by @xmath136 of a @xmath30 lattice @xmath1 , obtained from the bosonic peps in fig . [ fig : bosonpeps](a ) by replacing line crossings with fermionic swap gates . the coefficients @xmath140 are obtained by contracting this fermionic peps using standard tensor multiplication techniques ( see text ) . the presence of fermionic swap gates introduces a complex structure of minus signs in @xmath140 . ( b ) bulk tensor @xmath33}$ ] , which is chosen to be parity preserving , eq . . ( c ) hermitian conjugate of @xmath33}$ ] . ( d ) scalar product @xmath54 written as a tensor network of reduced tensors @xmath53}$ ] defined in ( e ) . notice that , in a @xmath45 lattice , @xmath141 fermionic swap gates pervade the peps and yet , thanks to the jump move , fig . [ fig : jumpmove ] , it is possible to write the scalar product @xmath54 in terms of only @xmath142 fermionic swap gates and in such a way that all of them are near a pair @xmath38},a^{[\vec{r}]\dagger})$ ] and can therefore be absorbed into the definition of the reduced tensor @xmath53}$ ] . [ for a detailed derivation , replace line crossings with fermionic swap gates in fig . [ fig : bosonscalar ] ] . as a result , there are no fermionic swap gates left in @xmath52 , and therefore this tensor network can be contracted using the techniques employed for bosonic peps.,width=264 ] rule 1 is very convenient from a computational perspective : it ensures that the parity of the wave function is exactly preserved during ( otherwise approximate ) calculations , while the block diagonal structure of tensors can be exploited to reduce computational costs . in addition , rule 1 is important in order to account for the antisymmetric character of fermionic wavefunctions ( rule 2 ) in a simple way . however , we emphasize that tensor networks made of parity preserving tensors are also useful to describe bosonic systems ( e.g. , a @xmath143 invariant spin system , such as the quantum ising model ) and therefore rule 1 is not what turns a bosonic tensor network ansatz into a fermionic one . rule 2 accounts for the fermionic character of the tensor network , in the sense that it is employed to mimic the effect of anticommutators in a network of fermionic operators , as justified in ref . in the context of the mera ( see also the note on terminology in the introduction of this paper ) . several additional remarks concerning fermionic tensor networks and their manipulations are in order . we start with a number of comments on fermionic tensor network representations that are relevant to the present formulation of the fermionic peps ansatz . \(i ) _ fermionic order_. the label @xmath144 for the sites of @xmath1 establishes an order on these sites . this order has been used to define a local basis of the hilbert space in eq . , and can also be used to translate the local fermionic lattice model into a non - local bosonic one through the jordan - wigner transformation of eq . ( although this is not the strategy that we follow here ) . according to our prescription to graphically represent tensors and tensor networks , this order is also the order in which the open indices are drawn in fig . [ fig : fermipeps](a ) . notice that the structure of line crossings in the peps depends on the fermionic order and therefore the number and location of fermionic swap gates , see fig . [ fig : orders ] . notice also that , in contrast with refs . , we do not explicitly introduce fermionic operators ( and corresponding order ) on the bond indices of the peps , but use instead a simple graphical notation and two rules that already account for the complex pattern of fermionic - exchange minus signs in tensor @xmath145 . corresponds to a specific choice of fermionic order , which appears in the definition of the local basis of eq . and jordan - wigner transformation of eq . . ( b ) another possible fermionic peps , associated to another fermionic order . the two tensor networks are not equivalent in that they can not be mapped into each other by jump moves alone ( where one is not allowed to drag a line over the end of another open line ) , but the mapping is possible if we allow some additional fermionic exchanges to modify the order of the open lines . importantly , it can be seen that the tensors @xmath31}\}$ ] in both peps appear in the same way in any expectation value . in particular , they would be optimized using exactly the same figure of merits . this shows that the tensors @xmath31}\}$ ] are independent of the choice of fermionic order.,width=264 ] \(ii ) _ local operators_. a local fermionic operator @xmath15 is characterized by a tensor of components that describes the action of @xmath15 on a given basis of states . for instance , in the simple case where each site has a vector space @xmath5 of dimension @xmath19 , we expand a two - site operator @xmath15 as @xmath146 where @xmath147 and @xmath148 and @xmath149 are the annihilation operators acting on the two sites ( see appendix [ app : genoperators ] for the @xmath150 case ) . the coefficients @xmath151 are given by @xmath152 for instance , a hopping term @xmath153 reads @xmath154 since the only non - vanishing coefficient is @xmath155 which is obtained using the anticommutation relations . when the two - site operator @xmath15 acts on two sites @xmath156 , the state @xmath12 of the system is modified into some other state @xmath157 . this is implemented simply by connecting the tensor ( or tensor network ) that represents @xmath158 with the four - index tensor @xmath159 as indicated in fig . [ fig : operator](a ) . in particular , when the two sites are not contiguous in the fermionic order , @xmath160 , a number of line crossings appear . this is reflected in the computation of the expectation value @xmath14 , see fig . [ fig : operator](b)-(d ) . is described by a tensor @xmath161 of coefficients obtained by connecting tensors @xmath25 and @xmath70 . the example corresponds to a @xmath162 lattice and a choice of fermionic order such that the two sites on which @xmath15 acts , which are nearest neighbors in @xmath1 , are not contiguous in the fermionic order ( they occupy positions @xmath163 and @xmath164 ) . the line crossings ( fermionic swap gates ) that appear in connecting tensors @xmath25 and @xmath70 can be interpreted as changes in the fermionic order needed in order to bring the two sites on which @xmath15 acts together , then bringing them back to their original position . ( b ) expectation value @xmath73 . ( c ) the same expectation value in terms of a fermionic peps . ( d ) after some manipulation , an approximation of the expectation value is expressed in terms of an approximate two - site environment @xmath82}$ ] and tensors @xmath71}$ ] , @xmath71\dagger}$ ] , @xmath72}$ ] , @xmath72\dagger}$ ] and @xmath70 , as it was done for a bosonic system in fig . [ fig : bosonenv ] . the only difference here is the presence of a few fermionic swap gates.,width=302 ] \(iii ) _ parity changing tensors_. parity preserving tensors allow us to represent both states @xmath12 with even fermionic particle number ( i.e. parity @xmath165 ) and local operators @xmath15 that are parity preserving . but they also allow us to represent states with an odd fermionic particle number ( parity @xmath166 ) and parity changing operators . this is so because a parity changing tensor @xmath167 , @xmath168 can be represented as a parity preserving tensor @xmath56 , @xmath169 where the additional index @xmath170 only takes one value , @xmath171 . for instance , in order to represent a state @xmath102 with an odd number of particles by means of a peps , an additional index @xmath172 is attached to one of the peps tensors , see fig . [ fig : pchanging](a ) . similarly , a fermionic annihilation operator @xmath173 , which changes parity , can be represented as a tensor with three indices , one of which is fixed to @xmath171 , see fig . [ fig : pchanging](b ) . it is sometimes computationally convenient ( e.g. in the computation of two - point correlators , fig . [ fig : correlator ] ) to represent a parity preserving operator that is the product of two parity changing operators , such as the hopping operator @xmath174 in eq . , by two parity preserving tensors connected by a fixed index @xmath172 , see fig . [ fig : pchanging](b ) . , of a @xmath175 lattice , with odd parity @xmath166 . all peps tensors are parity preserving . one of the tensors has an additional index @xmath176 with fixed parity @xmath166 . ( b ) the tensor @xmath70 of coefficients @xmath177 for a two - site operator such as a hopping term @xmath178 in eq . , that is the product of two parity changing operators , @xmath179 and @xmath149 , can be decomposed as the product of two parity - preserving tensors @xmath180 and @xmath181 connected by an index @xmath176 with fixed parity @xmath166 . this decomposition is useful e.g. in the computation of a correlator involving two distant sites , see fig . [ fig : correlator ] . notice that parity preserving tensor @xmath180 can also be used independently of @xmath181 in order to represent the parity changing operator @xmath148 . , width=302 ] \(iv ) _ simplification_. in the particular case of a pair of crossing lines @xmath137 and @xmath170 where index @xmath170 only takes one possible value @xmath111 of the parity , the fermionic swap gate @xmath133 reduces to a product of two gates . namely , to a product of two identity operators @xmath182 if @xmath183 , and to a product of the parity @xmath112 on line @xmath137 and identity @xmath184 on line @xmath170 if @xmath166 . it follows , for instance , that the jump move applied to a line @xmath137 and a parity preserving tensor @xmath56 with an index @xmath185 ( used e.g. to represent a parity changing tensor @xmath167 in eqs . -[eq : tt ] ) allows us to ignore index @xmath170 in @xmath56 at the price of applying the parity operator @xmath112 to line @xmath137 , see fig . [ fig : jumpmove](b ) . this simplification appears to be useful e.g. in the calculation of the expectation value @xmath186 , see fig . [ fig : correlator ] . a fermionic tensor network can be manipulated simply by performing a sequence of tensor multiplications . it turns out , however , that by considering a special property ( jump move ) of fermionic tensor networks obeying rules 1 and 2 , the fermionic swap gates can be treated in a very special and advantageous way : they can be ignored until they correspond to a crossing of two indices connected to the same tensor , in which case they can be absorbed into the tensor using a low cost operation . as a result , in a fermionic tensor network algorithm we can follow the same sequence of tensor multiplications that we would have employed to manipulate its bosonic counterpart . in particular , we can use the same optimal sequence of contractions , with the same computational cost ( to leading order ) . let us discuss all these aspects in more detail . is represented with a parity preserving tensor @xmath56 with an extra index @xmath172 that remains open . in this case the jump rule introduces an additional fermionic swap gate @xmath129 , involving @xmath170 and the jumping line , that reduces to a parity operator @xmath187 on the jumping line ( see text ) . ( c ) a line can also be dragged over a set of open lines provided that the latter have even overall parity ( in other words , provided they could be connected to a parity preserving tensor),width=302 ] \(i ) _ jump move_. it follows from rules 1 and 2 that in a fermionic tensor network , as in the bosonic case , lines can be dragged over tensors , see fig . [ fig : jumpmove](a ) . this invariance under ` jump ' moves allows us to modify fermionic tensor networks in such a way that the fermionic swap gates do not increase the leading cost of manipulations . for a proof of this property , which exploits the fact that tensors are parity - preserving , we refer again to ref . . notice that the jump move does not include dragging a line over the open end of another line ( this would amount to a change in the local fermionic order ) . the latter transformation is only allowed when it involves a set of open lines with even overall parity , as explained next . \(ii ) _ open lines_. by construction , line ends only appear in the diagrams grouped in such a way that they could be connected to a parity preserving tensor ( that is , their combined parity is always even ) without introducing additional crossings to the network . for instance , the set of all open legs of the peps in figs . [ fig : fermipeps](a ) or [ fig : pchanging](a ) have even overall parity , since the peps as a whole has parity @xmath183 . another example is given by the open legs of an environment , fig . [ fig : corner](c ) . since such groups of open legs with even overall parity could be connected to a parity preserving tensor , the jump move extends naturally to them , as illustrated in fig . [ fig : jumpmove](c ) . \(iii ) _ absorption of a fermionic swap gate_. given a tensor @xmath56 , with coefficients @xmath188 , such that the two contiguous indices @xmath189 are connected to a fermionic swap gate , it is possible to absorb the latter into the former and produce a new tensor @xmath167 with coefficients @xmath190 the cost of the absorption is thus just proportional to the number of coefficients in @xmath56 and comparable to permuting two adjacent indices in a bosonic tensor network . this cost is , in particular , smaller than the tensor multiplication that may have produced @xmath56 or a subsequent tensor multiplication involving @xmath167 . therefore the absorption of fermionic swap gates only makes a sub - leading contribution to the total cost of contracting a fermionic tensor network ( in the same way that the permutation of indices only makes a sub - leading contribution to the total cost of contracting a bosonic tensor network ) . and @xmath191 connected by two lines . ( b ) by means of a jump move , all lines standing between @xmath192 and @xmath191 can be dragged away . ( c ) any fermionic swap gate involving the lines that connect @xmath192 and @xmath191 can be absorbed into e.g. tensor @xmath192 , which is mapped into some @xmath193 . ( d ) finally tensors @xmath194 and @xmath191 are multiplied together , producing tensor @xmath56 . the cost of all these manipulations is dominated by the last step.,width=302 ] \(iv ) _ same leading cost_. in a bosonic system , the contraction of a tensor network is implemented by a sequence of multiplications of tensors , where each multiplication involves two tensors and the sequence is chosen carefully to minimize computational costs . in the fermionic case , it is natural to ask whether the presence of fermionic swap gates will modify the optimal sequence of tensor multiplications and increase the computational cost of the contraction . it turns out that one can always follow the same sequence of multiplications as in the bosonic case . indeed , as illustrated in the example of fig . [ fig : contractjump ] , in order to multiply two tensors , one can use jump moves and fermionic swap gate absorptions to eliminate any fermionic swap gate between the two tensors , which can then be multiplied together exactly as in the bosonic case . the leading cost of these manipulations is given by tensor multiplications , and it is therefore the same for bosonic and fermionic systems . we have explained how to build a fermionic peps for the state @xmath16 of a fermionic lattice system . the next step is to consider algorithms to compute the expectation value @xmath195 of a local operator @xmath15 from a fermionic peps , as well as to optimize the coefficients in its tensors @xmath31}\}$ ] . it turns out that these algorithms can be obtained by just introducing simple modifications to existing bosonic peps algorithms . here we discuss these modifications broadly . let us consider first the computation of the scalar product @xmath54 . as we did in the bosonic case , see fig . [ fig : bosonscalar ] , we build this scalar product by connecting the open indices of a peps for @xmath12 with those for a peps for @xmath57 obtained by hermitian conjugation . the resulting tensor network may contain , in the fermionic case , a large number of fermionic swap gates . however , an important point is that , by using the jump move of fig . [ fig : jumpmove](a ) , the scalar product @xmath54 can again be re - expressed in terms of a tensor network @xmath52 made of reduced tensors @xmath196}\}$ ] , see fig . [ fig : fermipeps](d ) . as shown in fig . [ fig : fermipeps](e ) , the fermionic reduced tensor @xmath53}$ ] differs from its bosonic counterpart by the presence of four fermionic swap gates . importantly , in a finite or infinite lattice with open boundary conditions , _ all _ fermionic swap gates present in the scalar @xmath54 are absorbed into the reduced tensor @xmath53}$ ] . thus , the tensor network @xmath52 contains no fermionic swap gates . as a result , an approximation to the scalar product @xmath54 can be obtained by contracting @xmath52 with _ exactly _ the same approximate contraction techniques ( namely mps techniques for finite peps@xcite and either infinite mps or ctm techniques for infinite peps@xcite ) as in the bosonic case . [ in some implementations , it is possible to lower computational costs by considering the components @xmath33}$ ] and @xmath33\dagger}$ ] of @xmath53}$ ] separately . in this case the approximate contraction techniques have to be slightly modified so as to account for the four fermionic swap gates involved in the definition of @xmath53}$ ] ] . figure [ fig : cylinder ] considers a peps for a fermionic lattice system on a cylinder . its scalar product can again be expressed in terms of a tensor network @xmath52 , made of reduced tensors @xmath196}\}$ ] , that contains no line crossings . therefore its contraction can also be performed exactly as in the bosonic case . instead , in a fermionic lattice system on a torus , the analogous tensor network @xmath52 contains a number of fermionic swap gates , see fig . [ fig : torus ] . however , it can be seen that even in this case @xmath52 can still be coarse - grained using the same terg techniques of ref . for the bosonic case , by properly coarse - graining the swap fermionic gates at each step of the coarse - graining . of fermionic @xmath30 lattice with cylindrical boundary conditions . ( b ) tensor network for the scalar product @xmath54 . ( c ) tensor network @xmath52 of reduced tensors @xmath196}\}$ ] . as in a system with open boundary conditions , @xmath52 has no line crossings and can be contracted as in the bosonic case . , width=321 ] of fermionic @xmath30 lattice with toroidal boundary conditions . ( b ) tensor network for the scalar product @xmath54 . ( c ) tensor network @xmath52 of reduced tensors @xmath196}\}$ ] . on the torus , it is not possible to eliminate all line crossings in @xmath52 , which must contain fermionic swap gates and therefore differs from the bosonic case . however , terg techniques@xcite can still be applied by noting that the coarse - graining of the reduced tensors @xmath196}\}$ ] can take place independently of the fermionic swap gates , which are also coarse - grained in an obvious way . the ( coarse - grained ) fermionic swap gates only need to be absorbed into the rest of the tensor network at the latest coarse - graining step , when the torus has been reduced to only a few lattice sites . , width=321 ] as discussed in sec . [ sec : peps : optim ] , given an environment @xmath197}$ ] , an approximation @xmath198}$ ] can be used both for the computation of the expectation value @xmath199 of a local operator @xmath15 and for the optimization of the tensors @xmath200}\}$ ] defining the peps . the approximate contraction of @xmath197}$ ] leading to @xmath198}$ ] is very similar to the contraction of @xmath52 for the scalar product @xmath54 , and can again be accomplished in the fermionic case using the same techniques than in the bosonic case . from @xmath198}$ ] , obtaining an approximation to the expectation value @xmath73 involves contracting the tensor network of fig . [ fig : operator](d ) , which differs from its bosonic counterpart in the presence of 12 fermionic swap gates . an analogous tensor network is central to the update of the peps tensors @xmath31}\}$ ] during an imaginary - time evolution towards the ground state @xmath81 of a nearest neighbor fermionic hamiltonian @xmath13 , cf . more details of this update will be provided in sec . [ sec : ctm ] in the context of an infinite lattice system , where also the computation of two - point correlators between distant sites will be addressed . to summarize , the differences between bosonic and fermionic peps algorithms are in practice reduced to : ( i ) use of parity preserving tensors @xmath31}\}$ ] to efficiently encode the state @xmath9 ; and ( ii ) presence of fermionic swap gates in some of the tensor networks that need to be contracted , e.g. in order to compute the expected value of a local observable or optimize the tensors @xmath31}\}$ ] of the variational ansatz . however , thanks to the jump move , the optimal sequence of tensor multiplications involved in the contraction of a given fermionic tensor network is the same than in the bosonic case , as is the incurred computational cost . all in all , we see that fermionic peps algorithms can be obtained by introducing a few modifications to bosonic peps algorithms . this is further illustrated in the next section , where we provide more details on the specific peps algorithm used in sec . [ sec : results ] , namely the ipeps algorithm.@xcite in sec . [ sec : results ] the formulation of fermionic peps presented in this paper is tested by computing the ground state of a number of models on an infinite lattice . in this section we provide additional details on the fermionic ipeps ansatz and algorithm used for those computations . we start by reviewing the bosonic ipeps algorithm.@xcite then we describe the modifications required in order to address a fermionic system . } $ ] for two contiguous sites @xmath65 , in terms of the reduced tensors @xmath205 and @xmath206 corresponding to the peps tensors @xmath202 and @xmath203 . ( b ) approximate environment @xmath82}$ ] expressed in terms of 10 tensors , corresponding to the 10 shaded regions in ( a ) , as used in the ctm approach@xcite . some of the tensor are used in fig . [ fig : correlator](b ) . ( c ) approximate environment @xmath82}$ ] written in terms of 6 tensors @xmath69 , as used in the computation of the expectation value of a two - site observable @xmath15 ( fig . [ fig : correlator](a ) ) and the update of tensors @xmath202 and @xmath203 during an imaginary - time evolution ( fig . [ fig : revupdate3]).,width=340 ] let us first consider how to compute the expectation value of a two - site operator @xmath15 , see eq . . this requires computing both @xmath54 and @xmath73 . the scalar product @xmath54 is expressed in terms of an infinite 2d tensor network @xmath52 of reduced tensors @xmath205 and @xmath206 distributed according to a checkerboard pattern . as in a finite system , an environment @xmath207}$ ] for two nearest sites @xmath76 is then built from @xmath52 by removing two reduced tensors , see fig . [ fig : corner](a)-(b ) . contracting @xmath207}$ ] requires an approximation scheme , which produces an approximate environment @xmath82}$ ] consisting of six tensors @xmath69 connected through bond indices that take @xmath208 different values , see fig . [ fig : corner](d ) . here @xmath208 quantifies the degree of approximation in @xmath82}$ ] . one possible approximation scheme consists in using infinite mps techniques , as was discussed in the original ipeps algorithm in ref . . another possible approximation scheme consists in using ctm techniques,@xcite as discussed in the context of the ipeps algorithm in ref . . an approximation @xmath209 to the expectation value @xmath195 of a two - site observable @xmath15 is then obtained by computing @xmath210 where @xmath184 denotes the identity operator on the space @xmath211 of two sites of @xmath1 and we use the same approximate environment @xmath82}$ ] to compute @xmath212 and @xmath213 , where the latter is computed as an expectation value for @xmath214 . the approximate value @xmath215 will in general differ from the exact value @xmath195 . one expects , however , that in the limit of a large @xmath208 one recovers the exact value , @xmath216 in practice , we compute @xmath215 for increasingly large values of @xmath208 , e.g. @xmath217 , until the expectation value @xmath215 does no longer depend substantially in @xmath208 , and assume that this corresponds to @xmath195 . the cost of computing @xmath215 using ctm techniques scales with the peps bond dimension @xmath43 and the environment bond dimension @xmath208 as @xmath218 . notice that for any value of the bond dimension @xmath43 , a peps produces a variational energy @xmath219 , @xmath220 that is @xmath221 , where @xmath222 is the exact ground state energy . therefore , if we could compute @xmath219 exactly , we would obtain an upper bound to @xmath222 , which could e.g. be compared with another upper bound corresponding to another variational ansatz . however , the approximate value @xmath223 is not guaranteed to be an upper bound to @xmath222 . in this paper we assume that @xmath223 is an upper bound to @xmath222 once it has converged for large values of @xmath208 . this assumption is seen to be correct in the case of free fermions in sec . [ sec : results ] . in the ipeps algorithm of refs . an approximation to the ground state is obtained by simulating an evolution in imaginary time , eq . . the optimization of tensors @xmath202 and @xmath203 during the imaginary - time evolution is achieved by breaking the evolution into steps ( suzuki - trotter decomposition ) and then considering updates that involve a single link . there are four types of updates , corresponding to the four inequivalent links given by the bond indices @xmath41 of tensor @xmath202 . for each link , new tensors @xmath224 and @xmath225 are produced as a result of an optimization that aims to account for the action of a two - site gate @xmath226 } \delta t)$ ] acting on that link . we refer to refs . for a detailed explanation on how to use the approximate environment @xmath82}$ ] to obtain updated tensors @xmath224 and @xmath225 . the algorithm proceeds by iteratively updating tensors @xmath202 and @xmath203 until they converge to some pair of tensors that depend on @xmath208 and the time step @xmath227 . a finite time step @xmath227 introduces errors in the imaginary - time evolution . a better approximation to the ground state is obtained by gradually reducing @xmath227 until its value does no longer affect significantly quantities of interest ( e.g. the energy ) . for instance , this occurs for @xmath228 in the simulations of sec . [ sec : results ] . the cost of simulating an imaginary - time evolution is proportional to the number of time steps that are being simulated and scales as @xmath229 , since each update requires reconverging an approximate two - site environment @xmath68}$ ] . a simplified way of simulating an evolution in imaginary time was proposed in ref . . this simplified update does not involve the environment @xmath68}$ ] and has a much lower cost per iteration , namely @xmath230 when applied in a straightforward way and reducible to @xmath231 after more careful considerations . on the one hand , ignoring the environment ( that is , the rest of the wavefunction ) implies that the update may not be optimal , and indeed there are cases , such as the 2d quantum ising model near its critical point , where it produces a less accurate approximation to the ground state,@xcite although we also found many cases where it only performs marginally worse than when using the environment . on the other hand , its much lower cost accelerates the simulations considerably . notice , however , that the computation of expectation values with the resulting peps still requires computing @xmath68}$ ] , which has cost @xmath229 . defined in terms of peps tensors @xmath202 and @xmath232 and four fermionic swap gates . ( b ) reduced tensor @xmath206 defined in terms of peps tensors @xmath203 and @xmath233 and four fermionic swap gates.,width=340 ] to the expectation value @xmath14 of a local observable @xmath15 acting on two contiguous sites . this tensor network only differs from the one in fig . [ fig : bosonenv](e ) for a bosonic system in the presence of 12 fermionic swap gates . ( b ) computation of two - point correlators . for concreteness , we consider the expected value @xmath234 discussed in eq . . the figure shows the tensor network representing @xmath235 , where sites @xmath189 are in the same row of @xmath1 but separated by 4 sites . notice the line connecting the two tensors corresponding to operators @xmath236 and @xmath237 , which crosses a number of other lines introducing a number of fermionic swap gates . since this line corresponds to an index @xmath172 with well - defined parity @xmath166 , the fermionic swap gates simplify into @xmath238.,width=340 ] as in the bosonic case , the fermionic ipeps ansatz exploits translation invariance of a system on an infinite lattice @xmath1 to store the state @xmath12 using only a small number of peps tensors , which are repeated throughout the lattice . whether we are interested in approximating a ground state invariant under translations by one site or with checkerboard order , we consider again just two ( parity preserving ) peps tensors @xmath202 and @xmath203 as in eq . . it may not seem obvious that a fermionic ipeps , characterized by tensors @xmath202 and @xmath203 , represents a state @xmath12 of the infinite lattice @xmath1 that is invariant under diagonal shifts ( checkerboard order ) . indeed , the presence of the ubiquitous fermionic swap gates , which are not homogeneously distributed across the tensor network corresponding to the ipeps ( see fig . [ fig : fermipeps ] for an illustration in the case of a finite peps ) may seem incompatible with the checkerboard order . however , the checkerboard order becomes manifest during the computation of expectation values for local observables . given a fermionic ipeps , the computation of the expectation value of e.g. a two - site observable @xmath15 is very similar to the bosonic case . since there are no fermionic swap gates in the tensor network @xmath52 for the scalar product @xmath54 or the two site environment @xmath64}$ ] , these tensor networks can be contracted exactly in the same way as in a bosonic ipeps . [ if one wants to use the decomposition of the reduced tensors @xmath205 and @xmath206 in terms of @xmath202 and @xmath203 , fig . [ fig : reducedab ] , the presence of four fermionic swap gates needs to be taken into account ] . in the simulations of sec . [ sec : results ] , we have used the directional ctm approach discussed in ref . in order to produce an approximate environment @xmath68}$ ] . then an approximation @xmath209 to the expected value @xmath195 is computed using the tensor network of fig . [ fig : correlator](a ) . figure [ fig : correlator](b ) describes the tensor network that needs to be contracted in order to compute a two - point correlators . the simulation of time evolution proceeds in a very similar way as in the bosonic ipeps algorithm , with the difference that the tensor networks involved contain fermionic swap gates instead of simple line crossings . a detailed description of the two updates used in this paper is presented in appendix . [ app : twosite ] . before we move to presenting the results of ground state computations , we conclude this section with a summary of the fermionic ipeps algorithm : \(i ) _ ansatz . _ the state @xmath12 of the system on an infinite square lattice @xmath1 is encoded in two parity symmetric tensors @xmath202 and @xmath203 . these tensors depend on @xmath239 parameters , where @xmath6 is the dimension of the vector space @xmath5 of one site of @xmath1 and @xmath43 is the bond dimensions of the ipeps . \(ii ) _ computation of expectation values_. given tensors @xmath202 and @xmath203 , the reduced tensors @xmath205 and @xmath206 are computed according to fig . [ fig : reducedab ] . from the reduced tensors @xmath205 and @xmath206 , an approximation @xmath68}$ ] to a two - site environment @xmath64}$ ] is obtained using the ctm algorithm , see fig . [ fig : corner ] . the computational cost scales as @xmath229 , where @xmath208 is the bond dimension of the approximate environment . then expectation values are computed by contracting small tensor networks involving @xmath68}$ ] . for instance , an approximation @xmath215 to the expected value @xmath195 , eq . , for an operator @xmath15 on two nearest neighbor sites is obtained according to fig . [ fig : correlator](a ) , whereas an approximation to a two - point correlator is obtained according to fig . [ fig : correlator](b ) . \(iii ) _ approximation of the ground state_. starting from e.g. random tensors @xmath202 and @xmath203 , an imaginary - time evolution is used to find an approximation to the ground state of a local hamiltonian @xmath13 . the two updates of appendix [ app : twosite ] can be used : the _ standard _ update , which in general produces better ground state approximations and has cost @xmath229 ; and the _ simplified _ update , which has a significantly lower cost and is often only marginally less accurate than the standard update . in this section we test the fermionic ipeps algorithm , as summarized at the end of the last section , for several models of free and interacting fermions in an infinite square lattice @xmath1 . we start by considering an exactly solvable model of free spinless fermions , which allows us to compare the numerical results with the exact solution , and therefore assess the accuracy of the approach . it turns out that , similarly as in the 2d mera , @xcite the accuracy of the numerical results depends on the amount of entanglement in the system . we also compare the use of the standard and simplified updates discussed in appendix [ app : twosite ] . the second model , describing interacting spinless fermions on a square lattice , is no longer exactly solvable . we compare our results for the phase diagram with the hartree - fock ( hf ) solution from ref . , and show that our results for large @xmath240 are an improvement upon the hf result . the final example is the @xmath0 model , where we compare energies obtained with ipeps with previous variational monte carlo results based on gutzwiller - projected ansatz wave functions . in all these examples we present ipeps results for different bond dimensions @xmath43 , and study the convergence of the energy as a function of @xmath208 , the bond dimension of the environment . in all these examples we chose @xmath241 , see eq . . the first model under consideration is an exactly solvable model of free spinless fermions,@xcite given by the hamiltonian @xmath242 - 2\lambda \sum_i { \hat c}_{i}^{\dagger } { \hat c}_i , \label{eq : free}\ ] ] with @xmath243 denoting the sum over nearest - neighbor pairs , @xmath244 the chemical potential , and @xmath245 the pairing potential . figure [ fig : ff_pd ] shows the exact phase diagram of the model.@xcite for @xmath246 the model reduces to the usual tight - binding model of free fermions , with a metal phase for @xmath247 and a band insulator for @xmath248 . also the line @xmath249 , @xmath250 corresponds to a metal phase with a one dimensional fermi surface . for @xmath250 , @xmath251 the system is superconducting , with a critical phase for @xmath252 and a gapped phase for @xmath253 . as a function of chemical potential @xmath244 and pairing potential @xmath245 . for @xmath250 , @xmath251 the system is superconducting.,width=264 ] , for different values of @xmath245 and @xmath43 . the dimension @xmath208 is 20 and 40 for @xmath254 and @xmath255 , respectively . , width=302 ] fig . [ fig : e_ff ] shows the relative error in the ground state energy obtained by simulating an imaginary - time evolution with the standard update ( cf . appendix [ app : twosite ] ) . results for bond dimensions @xmath254 and @xmath255 and at different locations in the phase diagram are shown . in the gapped phase , @xmath253 , accurate results are already obtained for @xmath254 , and for @xmath255 these accuracies are increased by one to three orders of magnitude . [ a special case is the band insulator for @xmath246 , @xmath256 , ( not shown ) which corresponds to an unentangled or product ground state and can be reproduced exactly even with bond dimension @xmath257 . ] the accuracy in the critical phase , @xmath258 , is of the order of @xmath259 for @xmath254 . increasing the bond dimension to @xmath255 , an order of magnitude is gained for @xmath260 , but the gain is smaller for @xmath261 . finally , the free fermion regime with a 1d fermi surface ( @xmath246 , @xmath262 ) is the most challenging case . note that in this case , the entanglement entropy exhibits a logarithmic correction to the area law.@xcite this shows that the accuracy of the results depends on the amount of entanglement in the system , similarly to the findings with the 2d mera . @xcite as a function of distance r ( in x - direction ) , see eq . , for two different values of @xmath263 of the free - fermion model . middle panels : absolute value of the correlation function @xmath264 in semi - logarithmic scale . lower panels : the difference between the simulation result @xmath265 and the exact result @xmath266 for different values of @xmath43 . notice that better accuracies are obtained in the gapped phase , which corresponds to a less entangled ground state.,width=302 ] next we study the accuracy obtained for the two - point correlator @xmath267 where @xmath268 , i.e. site @xmath170 is in the same row as site @xmath170 but separated by @xmath269 columns , see fig . [ fig : correlator](b ) . the ipeps results shown in fig . [ fig : ff_corrs ] are seen to approach the exact values with increasing @xmath43 . in the critical phase ( left panels ) only the correlations at short distances are reproduced accurately . the precision of the correlator at longer distance is rather poor for small @xmath43 , but improves upon increasing @xmath43 . in the gapped phase ( right panels ) the accuracy is clearly better , already for small bond dimension . for @xmath240 accurate results are obtained up to distance @xmath270 where the magnitude of the correlator is of the order @xmath271 . these results are obtained from simulations with the simplified update , and we checked that they are similar to the ones obtained with the standard update ( for @xmath254 and @xmath255 ) . we compare and discuss the two updates further below . , the bond dimension of the environment , for @xmath255 . in these examples the energy decreases monotonously with @xmath208 , i.e. the energy from the simulation is always larger than the true ground state energy.,width=302 ] since the ipeps is a variational ansatz , the ground state energy @xmath219 of a state represented by an ipeps is an upper bound of the exact ground state energy @xmath222 . with increasing bond dimension @xmath43 the true ground state can be represented more accurately , and consequently the energy @xmath219 becomes lower , i.e. a better upper bound of @xmath222 . however , as discussed in the previous section , quantities such as the energy can only be extracted in an approximate way from the ipeps . the error of this approximation depends on the bond dimension of the environment @xmath208 . in fig . [ fig : chidep ] the dependence of the relative error of the energy as a function of @xmath208 is plotted for an ipeps with bond dimension @xmath255 . we observe that , with increasing @xmath208 , the energy @xmath223 converges to some value that is indeed an upper bound for @xmath222 . this is consistent with the assumption that @xmath223 has converged to the true energy @xmath219 of our @xmath255 ipeps . in the other models analyzed in this section we will also assume that once @xmath223 does no longer change with increasing @xmath208 , it has attained @xmath219 and therefore is an upper bound to @xmath222 . [ fig : chidep ] shows that , in the present free model , the approximate energy @xmath223 monotonically decreases with increasing @xmath208 , and therefore any value of @xmath223 is already an upper bound to @xmath222 . however , this behavior is not true in general , as we will see further below . it is therefore important to study the convergence in @xmath208 in each case separately . , and @xmath272 ( @xmath273 for @xmath274 ) . the environment in the gapped phase converges considerably faster than in the critical phase.,width=302 ] let us make a few comments about the convergence of the environment in the ipeps algorithm , for fixed sets of tensors @xmath202 and @xmath203 which approximate the ground state of different phases . figure [ fig : envdep ] illustrates how the energy converges with the number of renormalization steps in the directional ctm algorithm @xcite for different points in the phase diagram . the environment in the gapped phase clearly converges faster than in the critical phase . here , the tensors at the boundary of the ipeps have been chosen randomly at the beginning . depending on the initial conditions of these boundary tensors the number of steps needed to converge can vary significantly . in practice , when using the standard update , we use the environment from the previous imaginary time step as an initial condition , so that only a few renormalization steps are needed to re - converge the environment . note also that for different initial boundary tensors the energy might converge to slightly different values ( especially in the critical phase ) . it is therefore advisable to check results for different initial boundary tensors . for this model , we have also compared the precision of the ground state energy obtained with the standard and simplified updates , see fig . [ fig : ff_compare ] . the accuracies obtained with the standard update are typically slightly better than the ones obtained with simplified updates . however , the simulations with the simplified update are computationally considerably cheaper , because the environment has to be computed only once at the end of the simulation for the evaluation of observables , whereas in the standard update the environment it has to be recomputed at each step of the imaginary - time evolution . the leading cost of the two methods is the same , but the computational cost differs by a rather large factor , which depends on the total number of imaginary - time steps . for the remaining examples of this paper we will consider only simplified updates this allowed us to perform simulations with @xmath240 and @xmath275 on a standard computer in roughly one day . we checked for @xmath254 and @xmath255 that the results obtained with the two updates give similar accuracies . it is conceivable , however , that the difference in accuracy between the two update schemes become larger with increasing @xmath43 , depending on the model under consideration . .,width=302 ] the second model under consideration is a model of interacting spinless fermions , which is not exactly solvable . it is defined by the hamiltonian @xmath276 - \mu \sum_i { \hat c}_{i}^{\dagger } { \hat c}_i + v \sum_{\langle ij \rangle } { \hat c}_i^{\dagger}{\hat c}_i { \hat c}_j^{\dagger}{\hat c}_j , \label{eq : hint}\ ] ] with @xmath277 the nearest - neighbor hopping amplitude , the ( repulsive ) nearest - neighbor interaction strength , and @xmath278 the chemical potential . the hartree - fock ( hf ) phase diagram @xcite as a function of @xmath279 and particle density @xmath280 is given fig . [ fig : if_pd ] ( solid line ) . the hf calculation predicts a gapped charge - density - wave ( cdw ) phase at half filling ( @xmath281 ) and a translational invariant normal state ( metal phase ) far away from half filling . in between these two phases they find a thermodynamically unstable region , which we identify as a phase separation ( ps ) region , i.e. where the system splits into two parts , one in the metal phase and the other in the cdw phase . is the interaction strength , and @xmath280 is the particle density ( filling ) . the charge - density wave phase ( checkerboard pattern ) at exactly half - filling ( @xmath281 ) is separated from the metal phase by a first order phase transition , with an intermediate region corresponding to phase separation ( ps ) . with increasing @xmath43 , the boundary between the metal phase and the ps region moves away from the hartree - fock ( hf ) result from ref . . dotted and dashed lines are a guide to the eye . the uncertainty of the phase boundaries obtained with ipeps is smaller than the symbol size ( in x - direction ) . , width=302 ] for @xmath282 , obtained by ipeps and hartree - fock ( hf).@xcite the first order phase transition between the metal phase and the charge - density wave ( cdw ) phase occurs at a value @xmath283 where the two corresponding energies cross . lower panel : particle density @xmath280 as a function of chemical potential . at the first order phase transition point @xmath283 , @xmath280 jumps from a certain value @xmath284 in the metal phase to @xmath281 in the cdw phase . for densities in between @xmath284 and @xmath281 the system exhibits phase separation . the numbers in brackets indicate the uncertainty in the last digit . , width=302 ] our results for the phase diagram , obtained with the simplified update using an ipeps with bond dimension @xmath255 and @xmath240 , are given by the squares and triangles in fig . [ fig : if_pd ] , respectively . the phase diagram obtained with ipeps qualitatively agrees with the hf solution . however , with increasing @xmath43 the phase boundary to ps region moves away from the hf result . in the following we explain how we computed the phase boundary and discuss the origin of this deviation . we focus only on the left half of the phase diagram , @xmath285 , since it is mirror symmetric with the @xmath281 line . we determined the phase boundary between the metal phase and the ps region for several values of @xmath279 , for @xmath255 and @xmath240 . for each value of @xmath279 , we studied the first order phase transition , which occurs at a certain value @xmath286 . the ipeps algorithm known to be particularly suitable to study first order phase transitions , thanks to displaying some degree of hysteresis . @xcite specifically , if we start a simulation with an ipeps that represents a state in e.g. the metal phase , it will remain in the metal phase upon increasing @xmath278 , even for values ( slightly ) larger than @xmath283 ( where the ground state is no longer metallic ) . this allows us to compute the energy of the metal phase in the region @xmath287 even though the cdw - state has a lower energy , and vice versa . we can therefore compute the energies of the ground states of the two phases individually , and the phase transition occurs where the two energies cross , as shown in the upper panel of fig . [ fig : if_energy ] for @xmath282 . at the transition point @xmath283 , the density @xmath280 jumps from a certain value @xmath288 in the metal phase to the value @xmath281 in the cdw phase , as plotted in the lower panel of fig . [ fig : if_energy ] . for densities with values between @xmath284 and @xmath281 there exists no homogenous ground state , i.e. the system exhibits phase separation ( cf . [ fig : if_pd ] ) . let us now compare the energies obtained with ipeps with the hf solution in fig . [ fig : if_pd ] . while the results in the cdw phase coincide ( up to @xmath289 ) , we obtain lower energies for @xmath240 than the hf result ( of the order of @xmath290 ) . this leads to a shift of the transition point @xmath283 to a larger value of @xmath278 , and thus the phase boundary appears at a larger value of @xmath284 than in the hf case . the error of the energy due to the finite @xmath208 is smaller than the symbol size ( cf . [ fig : if_chidep ] ) . within this error , we regard the results as `` variational '' energies , i.e. an upper bound of the true ground state energy . accordingly , our @xmath240 results in the metal phase are closer to the true ground state energy , and the phase boundary for @xmath240 is an improvement upon the hf solution . note that the convergence of the energy with @xmath208 in fig . [ fig : if_chidep ] is not monotonous as in the previous examples in fig . [ fig : chidep ] . still , for large @xmath208 the energies do not seem to change significantly anymore . for some simulations we observe that the environment does not converge to a fixed point , but rather oscillates slightly . in such a case the energy fluctuates around a certain value . we take this error also into account in our study . the final uncertainty of the phase boundary obtained by ipeps is smaller than the symbol sizes ( in x - direction ) in fig . [ fig : if_pd ] . all simulation results for this model were obtained with the simplified update of appendix [ app : twosite ] . is not monotonous . for large @xmath208 the values do not seem to change significantly anymore . we associate an error bar to the values of the energy , depending on the convergence behavior in @xmath208 . this error is smaller than the symbol sizes in fig . [ fig : if_energy].,width=302 ] as a final example we consider the @xmath0 model , @xmath291 with @xmath292 the spin index , @xmath293 the electron density and @xmath294 the spin @xmath295 operator on site @xmath137 , and @xmath296 . the @xmath0 model is an effective model of the hubbard model in the limit of strong on - site repulsion . the local hilbert space of each site contains three basis states @xmath297 , i.e. two electrons with opposite spins can not occupy the same lattice site as in the hubbard model . the @xmath0 model is an important model in the context of high - t@xmath298 superconductivity and its phase diagram is still controversial . we focus here on the parameter @xmath299 which lies in the relevant parameter range of cuprate superconductors . at half filling , i.e. particle density @xmath300 , the model corresponds to the antiferromagnetic spin 1/2 heisenberg model , where the ground state has long - range antiferromagnetic ( nel ) order . far away from half filling the model is a metal . at small , but finite doping @xmath301 , several studies predict a @xmath302-wave superconducting phase , see e.g. refs . and references therein . in studies with dmrg also a phase with stripe order @xcite was found at low doping . some studies suggest that the formation of stripes is due to phase separation of the undoped antiferromagnet and the superconducting phase . @xcite here we focus on the variational monte carlo ( vmc ) results from ref . , based on gutzwiller - projected ansatz wave functions . this study was done for finite lattices of size @xmath303 , where the finite size corrections of the energy are estimated to be of the order of @xmath304 . the monte carlo sampling error is of the same order of magnitude . at low doping ( @xmath305 ) the best variational energies are obtained by an ansatz wave function including superconductivity and antiferromagnetic order . at larger doping @xmath306 a better variational energy is obtained with an ansatz wave function that is superconducting without antiferromagnetic order . in the following we compare our energies with the best values obtained in this previous study . figure [ fig : tj_energy ] shows the energy per site ( with the chemical potential term subtracted ) as a function of particle density . one can see that the ipeps results approach the vmc results from ref . with increasing @xmath43 . for @xmath240 the ipeps energies are roughly @xmath259 higher than the vmc energies , and for @xmath307 the deviation is of the order of @xmath304 , which is the same order of magnitude as the error bar of the vmc results . note also , that some of the energies for @xmath307 are lower than the vmc results . however , the @xmath307 results are not necessarily `` variational '' energies , as we discuss below . of the @xmath0 model as a function of filling @xmath280 , with @xmath299 . with increasing @xmath43 , the energies obtained by ipeps are approaching the values from the variational monte carlo ( vmc ) study in ref . note that the chemical potential term has been subtracted from the energy . the error bars of the vmc results are of the order @xmath308 . lower panel : relative deviation between the energies obtained by ipeps and vmc . full symbols indicate that ipeps energy is lower than the vmc energy.,width=302 ] these preliminary results are encouraging for the future study of the phase diagram of the @xmath0 model using peps algorithms , because the current energies with the largest dimension @xmath307 are compatible with previous variational studies , and we expect to be able to increase @xmath43 by properly exploiting the global symmetries of the model . we also would like to emphasize that ipeps is a general ansatz , i.e. the same ansatz is used for any model on a square lattice , whereas in other variational studies the ansatz wave function is typically based on the specific physics of the model . it is remarkable that ipeps , which starts from a random initial state , yields comparable energies as the ones obtained by specialized ansatz wave functions . finally , it will be interesting to verify whether the phases obtained by ipeps correspond to the ones predicted by the variational study , or whether a phase with different dominant correlations appears , e.g. stripe - ordered phase , as previously found in dmrg studies . @xcite figure [ fig : tj_chi ] shows that the energies as a function of @xmath208 are sufficiently converged , both for @xmath255 and @xmath240 , i.e. the uncertainty due to a finite @xmath208 is much smaller than the symbol sizes in fig.[fig : tj_energy ] . we can thus view the energies for @xmath309 as `` variational '' in the sense that they are an upper bound of the true ground state energy . however , for at finite doping the energy increases with increasing @xmath208 , and it is at present not clear what value it will reach for larger ( and presently unaffordable ) values @xmath208 . thus , in this case the energy is not believed to necessarily be an upper bound to the exact ground state energy . . the energies for @xmath309 do not seem to change significantly anymore for large @xmath208 , whereas for @xmath307 the energy is still increasing at the largest value of @xmath208 used.,width=302 ] in recent months several theoretical proposals have appeared describing fermionic versions of tensor network algorithms for 2d lattice systems , namely fermionic mera@xcite and fermionic peps@xcite . in this paper we have explained how to obtain fermionic peps algorithms by applying the general fermionization procedure of tensor networks introduced in ref . . a highlight of our formulation of fermionic peps is its simplicity : it replaces the complexity involved in dealing with a network of fermionic operators with a tensor network built by following two rules , namely the use of parity preserving tensors and the substitution of line crossings with fermionic swap gates . we have then used the fermionic ipeps algorithm to compute an approximation to the ground state of several fermionic models on an infinite lattice . by simulating an exactly solvable model of free fermions,@xcite we have been able to see that even a fermionic peps with small bond dimension @xmath43 ( @xmath310 ) is already capable of reproducing up to several digits of the exact ground state energy , as well as two - point correlators . the results also showed that , similarly to what had been observed with the fermionic mera,@xcite the accuracy of the approach depends on the amount of entanglement in the system . generally speaking , gapped systems are less entangled than critical ones and , accordingly , a fermionic ipeps with a given bond dimension @xmath43 produces better accuracies for the former . the simulation of model of interacting spinless fermions has provided us with a first clear indication of the usefulness of the fermionic peps as a variational ansatz for the ground state of systems of interacting fermions . the fermionic peps approach reproduces the hartree - fock phase diagram@xcite , with metal and charge - density wave phases ; but even with bond dimension @xmath255 and @xmath240 , it improves the ground state energies on the metallic phase and this results in a significant shift of the phase boundary . finally , results for the @xmath0 model in the relevant parameter range for cuprate superconductors are particularly encouraging , given that fermionic peps , still at an early stage of development , already produce ground state energies comparable with those of previous variational studies.@xcite the main limitation in present calculations is due to the scaling @xmath229 of simulation costs with the peps bond dimension @xmath43 and the environment bond dimension @xmath208 , which restricts @xmath43 and @xmath208 to relatively small values . there are , however , several ways in which larger values of @xmath43 and @xmath208 could become affordable , thereby leading to more accurate results . on the one hand , one can incorporate the internal global symmetries of a model ( e.g. particle number conservation ) into the tensors and exploit their block structure to reduce computational costs.@xcite this strategy is expected to be decisive for the characterization of the phase diagram of the @xmath0 and hubbard models . on the other hand , monte carlo sampling techniques could be used to reduce the formal dependence of the simulation costs in @xmath43 and @xmath208 . @xcite finally , the use parallel computing on a large cluster would also lead to improved fermionic peps simulations . _ acknowledgements.- _ the authors thank j. de woul , e. langmann , and d. ivanov for providing us their data from refs . and . we also acknowledge inspiring discussions with j. jordan , r. pfeifer , l. tagliacozzo and h .- q . support from the university of queensland ( ecr2007002059 ) and the australian research council ( ff0668731 , dp0878830 ) is acknowledged . in the case of a lattice where each site is described by a generic vector space @xmath5 of finite dimension @xmath6 , we decompose @xmath5 into even and odd parity sectors , @xmath311 and use an index @xmath106 to label a basis with well defined parity , @xmath312 see sec . [ sec : peps : parity ] . we can also introduce a set @xmath313 of generalized fermionic operators on each site , where @xmath314 is defined as @xmath315 then a local operator @xmath15 acting on just one site can be expanded as @xmath316 notice that @xmath317 is parity preserving if @xmath318 and parity changing if @xmath319 . fermionic operators @xmath320}_{s_1}$ ] and @xmath321}_{s_2}$ ] acting on two different sites @xmath322 fulfill @xmath323}_{s_1 } { \hat f}^{[\vec{r}_2]}_{s_2 } = s(s_1,s_2 ) { \hat f}^{[\vec{r}_2]}_{s_2 } { \hat f}^{[\vec{r}_1]}_{s_1},\ ] ] where @xmath324 a two - site operator @xmath15 acting on sites @xmath325 can then be written as @xmath326 where @xmath327\dagger } { \hat f}_{s'_2}^{[\vec{r}_2]\dagger } { \mbox{$| 0_10_2 \rangle$ } } { \mbox{$\langle 0_10_2 |$ } } { \hat f}_{s_2}^{[\vec{r}_2 ] } { \hat f}_{s_1}^{[\vec{r}_1]}.\ ] ] and @xmath328.,width=302 ] is obtained from tensor @xmath202 by crossing the legs @xmath36 and @xmath6 . ( b ) tensor @xmath329 is obtained from tensor @xmath328 by crossing the legs @xmath330 and @xmath331 . ( c ) tensors @xmath332 and @xmath333 are obtained by joining the @xmath334 indices and the @xmath335 indices of @xmath336 , and doing a singular value decomposition of the resultant matrix . the singular values are included in the definition of tensor @xmath333 . ( d ) tensors @xmath337 and @xmath338 are obtained by joining indices @xmath339 and indices @xmath340 of @xmath203 together , then performing a singular value decomposition of the resulting matrix , then splitting the composed indices back apart . the singular values are included in tensor @xmath337 . ( e ) tensors @xmath341 and @xmath342 are obtained by joining indices @xmath343 and indices @xmath344 of @xmath345 , then performing a singular value decomposition of the resulting matrix , then splitting the composed indices back apart . the singular values are included in tensor @xmath342 . ( f ) tensors @xmath346 and @xmath347 are obtained by joining indices @xmath348 and indices @xmath349 of @xmath329 , then performing a singular value decomposition of the resulting matrix , then splitting the composed indices back apart . the singular values are included in tensor @xmath346.,width=340 ] is obtained by contracting a tensor network that contains the approximate environment @xmath82 } = \{e_1 , \cdots , e_6\}$ ] , tensors @xmath332 , @xmath341 , @xmath350 and @xmath347 , and a few fermionic swap gates . ( b ) tensor @xmath351 is obtained from the contraction of @xmath352 and the gate @xmath353.,width=321 ] this appendix describes how to update the tensors @xmath202 and @xmath203 that define a fermionic ipeps . we consider the two strategies employed to obtain the results of sec . [ sec : results ] , namely ( i ) the _ standard _ update , used in refs . for bosonic systems , which requires the approximate environment @xmath82 } = \{e_1,\cdots , e_6 \}$ ] of fig . [ fig : corner](d ) ; and ( ii ) a _ simplified _ update , used in ref . , which does not involve an environment . in these two schemes , a gate @xmath354}\delta t)$ ] is applied to the two sites @xmath355 of a given link , with tensors @xmath202 and @xmath203 , and new tensors @xmath224 and @xmath225 are chosen in order to best account for the action of the gate . here we simply list the steps required in order to obtain the updated tensors @xmath224 and @xmath225 . for a justification of the schemes we refer to refs . . we emphasize that the only difference between these updates and the ones used in a bosonic system is the presence of fermionic swap gates . in particular , if the fermionic swap gates are eliminated ( by setting @xmath356 in eqs . -[eq : s ] ) we obtain update algorithms for bosonic peps . in some models , such as the quantum ising model near criticality , @xcite the standard update produces significantly more accurate results than the simplified update , but this did not seem to be the case in the gapless phases studied in this paper . in all models away from criticality that we could test , the simplified update produces only marginally worse accuracies . on the other hand , the much lower computational cost of the simplified update allows to consider larger bond dimension @xmath43 than with the standard update . for concreteness , in the following we assume that the gate @xmath353 is applied on a horizontal link where tensors @xmath202 and @xmath203 are at the left and right , respectively . similar derivations apply to the other three types of links . and @xmath357 are obtained by iteratively solving two linearized equations . specifically , we iterate the following two steps until convergence : ( a ) given @xmath337 and @xmath346 , we obtain @xmath358 by solving the linear equation @xmath359 , where @xmath360 and @xmath361 are obtained as indicated in the diagram . then , we set @xmath362 , and compute @xmath363 . ( b ) given @xmath333 and @xmath342 , we obtain @xmath357 by solving the linear equation @xmath364 , where @xmath360 and @xmath361 are again obtained as indicated in the diagram . then , we set @xmath365 , and compute @xmath366.,width=245 ] given tensors @xmath202 and @xmath203 , an approximate environment @xmath82 } = \{e_1,\cdots , e_6 \}$ ] is obtained as described in sec . [ sec : ctm ] : first build the reduced tensors @xmath205 and @xmath206 , fig . [ fig : reducedab ] , which are the building blocks of the exact environment @xmath207}$ ] ; then use e.g. ctm techniques@xcite to produce an approximation @xmath82}$ ] to @xmath207}$ ] . on the other hand , it is convenient to introduce a number of additional tensors . first compute tensors @xmath345 and @xmath328 according to fig . [ fig : revupdate1 ] , as well as tensors @xmath336 and @xmath329 according to fig . [ fig : revupdate2](a , b ) . then perform a singular value decomposition of tensors @xmath336 , @xmath203 , @xmath345 and @xmath329 as explained in the caption of fig . [ fig : revupdate2](c - f ) . here we use the notation @xmath367 for the singular value decomposition of a matrix @xmath56 , where @xmath368 and @xmath369 are isometries and @xmath370 is the diagonal matrix of singular values . notice that the singular value decompositions are performed by regarding a tensor as a matrix after grouping its indices into two sets . is obtained from the contraction of @xmath332 and @xmath358 . ( b ) the updated tensor @xmath371 is computed by crossing the @xmath36 and @xmath6 indices of @xmath372 . ( c ) the updated tensor @xmath373 is obtained from the contraction of @xmath357 and @xmath350.,width=340 ] tensor @xmath374 is then obtained by contracting the tensor network of fig . [ fig : revupdate3](a ) , which in turn is used to produce tensor @xmath351 in fig . [ fig : revupdate3](b ) . from tensors @xmath374 and @xmath351 , updated tensors @xmath358 and @xmath357 are obtained by iterating until convergence the process explained in the caption of fig . [ fig : revupdate4 ] . for the simplified update from ref . , the structure of the peps tensor network is slightly different to the one considered so far in this paper . here the infinite peps is specified by two tensors @xmath384 and @xmath375 , and four diagonal matrices @xmath376 with non - negative diagonal entries that assign weights to the indices of @xmath384 and @xmath375 , see fig . [ fig : revupdate6](a ) . notice that the usual expression in terms of tensors @xmath202 and @xmath203 can be recovered e.g. by multiplying the square root of the weight matrices @xmath376 with the tensors @xmath384 and @xmath375 , see fig . [ fig : revupdate6](b)-(c ) . the simplified update consists of the following steps : first , a tensor @xmath385 is computed in analogous way as tensor @xmath336 in fig . [ fig : revupdate2](a ) . then tensor @xmath380 is obtained by contracting the network in fig . [ fig : revupdate7](a ) , and subsequently decomposed through a singular value decomposition as shown in fig . [ fig : revupdate7](b ) . this results in tensors @xmath377 and @xmath378 and the matrix of weights @xmath379 , which corresponds to the singular values of @xmath380 . at this stage @xmath379 is truncated into @xmath386 , which keeps only the @xmath43 largest diagonal entries of @xmath379 . then tensors @xmath377 and @xmath378 are also truncated accordingly . next , tensors @xmath387 and @xmath383 are obtained from ( the truncated version of ) tensors @xmath377 and @xmath378 as shown in fig . [ fig : revupdate8](a)-(b ) . finally , tensor @xmath388 is obtained from @xmath387 again in an analogous way as @xmath224 in fig . [ fig : revupdate5](b ) . h. c. jiang , z. y. weng , and t. xiang , phys . lett . 101 , 090603 ( 2008 ) . z. y. xie , h. c. jiang , q. n. chen , z. y. weng , and t. xiang , phys . 103 , 160601 ( 2009 ) . chen , c .- y . lai , and m .- f . yang , j. stat . mech . : theory exp . ( 2009 ) p10001 . g. vidal , phys . 99 , 220405 ( 2007 ) . g. vidal , phys . . lett . 101 , 110501 ( 2008 ) . l. cincio , j. dziarmaga , and m. m. rams phys . 100 , 240603 ( 2008 ) . g. evenbly and g. vidal , phys . 102 , 180406 ( 2009 ) . g. evenbly and g. vidal , phys . rev . b 79 , 144108 ( 2009 ) . v. murg , f. verstraete , and j. i. cirac , phys . rev . b 79 , 195119 ( 2009 ) . g. evenbly and g. vidal , arxiv:0904.3383 . b. bauer , g. vidal , and m. troyer , j. stat . mech . : theory exp . ( 2009 ) p09006 . p. chen , c .- y . lai , and m .- f . yang , arxiv:0910.5081 . h. yokoyama and m. ogata . 65 , 3615 ( 1996 ) . d. a. ivanov . phys . rev . b 70 , 104503 ( 2004 ) . m. lugas , l. spanu , f. becca , and s. sorella . phys . rev . b 74 , 165122 ( 2006 ) . l. spanu , m. lugas , f. becca , and s. sorella . phys . rev . b 77 , 024510 ( 2008 ) . s. r. white and d. j. scalapino . 80 , 1272 ( 1998 ) . s. r. white and d. j. scalapino . 81 , 3227 ( 1998 ) . s. r. white and d. j. scalapino . phys . rev . b 61 , 6320 ( 2000 ) . v. j. emery , s. a. kivelson , and h. q. lin . 64 , 475 ( 1990 ) . c. s. hellberg and e. manousakis , phys . 78 , 4609 ( 1997 ) . Abstract:

Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.

Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered . Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video . Paper: brown dwarfs are self - gravitating objects with physical and atmospheric properties intermediate between stars and planets . with masses below @xmath10.075 m@xmath2 depending on age and metallicity . see @xcite for an extensive discussion of evolutionary models . ] @xcite , these objects can not sustain hydrogen fusion , and hence cool and dim as they age , radiating primarily at infrared wavelengths . the evolution of their spectra spans the spectral classes m , l , t , and y , with transitions demarcated by the appearance and disappearance of absorption lines and bands as molecules form and condense out of their atmospheres at different temperatures and pressures ( and references therein ) . despite having a basic understanding of their evolution , brown dwarf formation remains an open question . standard jeans collapse of molecular clouds requires high densities so that gravity can overcome thermal pressure . once the collapse has begun , halting the accretion becomes problematic . several mechanisms have been proposed to resolve this issue , including turbulent fragmentation of protostellar clouds @xcite , fragmentation of pre stellar disks @xcite , ejection by dynamical interactions with other protostars @xcite , and photoerosion of prestellar cores . in principle , these formation mechanisms should leave traces on the statistical properties of brown dwarfs , including the occurrence of multiple systems and distributions of their separation , relative masses and eccentricity . observationally , it has been shown that multiplicity increases with primary mass , even at the lower mass end of the main sequence , with the g dwarf binary fraction being 57@xmath3 higher than that for m dwarfs @xcite . current estimates of the binary fraction of very low mass ( vlm ) late - m to t dwarfs ( vlm @xmath4 ) are @xmath5 , with a peak in separation at @xmath6 4 au and a mass ratio distribution peaking at nearly equal masses @xcite . however , these multiplicity statistics have been largely determined from resolved imaging programs , sampling separations greater than 3 au . @xcite pointed out that the current peak in the binary angular separation distribution is coincident with the resolution limit of hst and ground - based adaptive optics ( ao ) imaging , indicating that tight ( @xmath7au ) vlm binaries could be undercounted . likewise , @xcite and @xcite report a higher unresolved binary fraction ( @xmath8 ) based on overluminous binary candidates in color - magnitude plots . conversely , spectroscopic radial velocity ( rv ) studies find binary fractions of 2.5@xmath3 in systems separated by @xmath7 au @xcite and @xmath9 up to 3 au . for the 0 - 6 au range , @xcite estimate a binary fraction of 26@xmath10 . however , the difficulty of obtaining high resolution spectra of faint vlm dwarfs results in small sample size . since total binary fractions for vlm stars and brown dwarfs could range between @xmath11 , it is imperative to constrain this statistic to make conclusions about brown dwarf formation . an alternative method for detecting tight unresolved binaries , developed by @xcite , involves identifying blended light pairs , or spectral binaries . we will refer as _ spectral _ binaries to those objects whose combined - light spectrum shows distinct peculiarities that come from the highly structured spectra of single m , l and t dwarfs when blended together , as opposed to _ spectroscopic _ binaries which are binaries that show rv variations . the first brown dwarf spectral binary , 2mass j05185995@xmath122828372 , was serendipitously identified by @xcite based on its hybrid characteristics containing features of both l and t dwarfs . the superposition of l plus t dwarf spectra proved to be the simplest model of its peculiar spectrum and it was later resolved as a binary using the hubble space telescope @xcite . the unusually blue l dwarf sdss j080531.84 + 481233.0 was next identified as a spectral binary with l4.5 and t5 components by @xcite , based on a peculiar methane absorption band starting at @xmath13 m , and was later confirmed as an astrometric variable by @xcite . a third system , 2mass j03202839@xmath120446358 , was concurrently identified as an unresolved m9+t5 spectral binary @xcite and a rv variable with an orbital period of eight months @xcite . these examples serve to illustrate how spectral binaries can encompass a broad range of system architectures . to date , 34 vlm spectral binaries and candidates have been reported ( see table [ tab : sb ] ) , and ten have been confirmed by direct imaging , rv or astrometric variability (; gelino et al . in prep ) . detecting binaries using the spectral binary method is particularly useful for multiplicity statistics , as the method is independent of separation within 0@xmath145 , which translates to @xmath1510 - 20 au for field brown dwarfs at distances of 20 - 40 pc . the closest separation pairs can be followed - up to measure orbits and component masses , as well as infer ages by comparison to evolutionary models @xcite . systems with independent age constraints can also be used to test the evolutionary models directly @xcite . additionally , unresolved binaries are strong contaminants in luminosity functions that later lead to uncertainties in mass functions and studies of formation history through stellar populations @xcite , so their identification is extremely important . finally , spectral binaries with late - m / early - l primaries and t dwarf secondaries can straddle the hydrogen burning limit , thus giving additional insight into brown dwarf evolution . in this paper we adapt the technique of @xcite to search for spectral binaries composed of late - m or early - l dwarf primaries with t dwarf secondaries . m dwarfs are the most common stars in the galaxy @xcite , and are the brightest vlm objects , enabling better statistics through larger magnitude - limited search volumes and sample sizes . m - dwarf spectra are also intrinsically distinct from t - dwarf spectra , but differ in brightness by several magnitudes , rendering peculiar features extremely subtle . in [ sec : obs ] we describe our spectral sample used to find spectral binaries , drawn from the spex prism libraries and new observations . in [ sec : mtbin ] we explain our two methods to identify spectral binary candidates : by visual examination ( [ sec : visual ] ) and through spectral indices ( [ sec : specind ] ) . in [ sec : specfit ] , we perform single and binary template fitting to identify fourteen binary candidates . in [ sec : candidates ] , we describe the properties of the candidates . in [ sec : blue ] and [ sec : separation ] , we discuss our major contaminant , blue l dwarfs , and show preliminary evidence that the separations of spectral binaries are tighter than the resolved population . our results are summarized in [ sec : summary ] . the spex prism library is composed of low resolution ( @xmath16 ) spectra acquired with the spex @xmath17 m spectrograph , mounted on the 3.0 m nasa infrared telescope facility ( irtf ) , located in mauna kea , hawaii @xcite . all spectra were obtained using the prism - dispersed spex mode , which continuously samples wavelengths between @xmath18 m at a dispersion of @xmath19 pixel@xmath20 . the library includes close to 2,000 sources , both previously published data and 530 new spectra acquired between november 2000 and december 2013 ( table [ tab : newobs ] ) . the new observations were obtained with the 0@xmath145 or 0@xmath147 slit , generally aligned with the parallactic angle . total integration times ranged between 360 s and 1200 s , depending on source brightness and atmospheric conditions , and were obtained in an abba dither patter along the slit . spectra of nearby a0 v stars were used to flux calibrate the raw spectra and correct for telluric absorption . internal flat fields and argon arc lamps were observed with each flux standard for pixel response and wavelength calibration . all data were reduced with the spextool package @xcite using standard settings . a detailed description of our reduction procedures is given in @xcite . the sources observed have optical and/or near - infrared spectral classifications reported in the literature . to obtain a self - consistent set of spectral types , we computed spex spectral types based on spectral indices , following the method described in @xcite . from these , we selected two samples : the `` candidate '' sample which has been purged of spectral types outside the m7-l7 range , optical subdwarfs , giants , and poor quality spectra , but keeping binaries , objects suspected of being binaries from previous studies , young objects and unusually red and blue dwarfs , and the `` template '' sample which has been purged of binaries , candidate binaries , giants and poor quality spectra ( as determined by visual inspection ) only . the `` candidate '' sample contains 815 spectra of 738 objects with spex spectral types between m7-l7 , as those would be the potential primaries for late - m / early - l plus t binaries . the `` template '' sample comprise 1110 spectra of 992 single sources whose spectral types range between m7-l7 for primaries and t1-t8 for secondaries used in spectral fitting . the distribution of spectral types for both samples is shown in figure [ fig : sample ] . in both samples , the number of spectra decreases toward later spectral types due to declining space densities for l dwarfs @xcite and sensitivity limits for late l and t dwarfs . since there are significantly more sources with late - m spectral types in our samples , it is more likely to find binaries with a late - m primary . the sources included were observed as part of several different programs , including our ongoing program to compile a magnitude - limited sample of l dwarfs ( burgasser et al . in prep . ) . as such , we do not claim the sample to be complete or unbiased . the spectral morphology of unresolved late - m / early - l plus t dwarf binary systems gives rise to a distinctive feature in blended - light spectra : a small `` dip '' centered at 1.63 @xmath21 m , which is the combination of ch@xmath22 absorption from the secondary and feh from the primary @xcite . methane does not exist in the spectra of late - m / early - l dwarfs , so its presence indicates a t dwarf companion . however , this feature is very weak in blended - light spectra since a t dwarf is significantly fainter than the m / l primary ( e.g. @xmath23 3.5 mag between an m8 and a t5 , which is the case for 2mass j03202839@xmath120446358 ) . moreover , variations in the spectral slope for a blue or red l dwarf , can make this feature ambiguous , as can poor correction of hydrogen lines in the a0v calibrators . alternative indicators such as a relatively higher flux around the 1.25 @xmath21 m peak and * an * inflated bump short ward of 2.2 @xmath21 m , may also reveal the presence of a t dwarf companion , or that the spectrum of the source is unusually blue . to facilitate our visual inspection , we fit the candidate sample to templates of single objects , following the same chi - squared minimization routine as in section [ sec : specfit ] , and then subtracted the median combination of the ten best fitting single sources from each spectrum . the objects with residuals consistent with a t dwarf spectrum were selected as visual candidates . to validate this procedure , we also performed the same template subtraction on four confirmed spectral binaries : sdss [email protected] , 2mass j03202839@xmath120446358 , sdss j080531.89 + 481233.0 , and 2mass j13153094@xmath122649513 ( see table [ tab : sb ] ) . the residuals from these subtractions clearly exhibited t dwarf - like morphologies . twelve sources were selected as visual candidates . in addition to visual inspection , we also used spectral indices to identify additional candidate binaries due to the subtlety of t dwarf features in combined - light spectra @xcite . we initially examined standard classification indices from @xcite , as well as the `` _ _ h__-dip '' index from @xcite , and further defined five new indices . the new indices were designed by comparing the residuals of the four known binary spectra after subtracting their best single template fits . as a control sample , we also examined single templates subtracted from each other , which showed no evidence for a t dwarf companion . the new spectral indices specifically designed in this paper are : * _ h_-bump : measures the peak in the continuum from the t dwarf in the _ h _ band relative to the dip centered around 1.63 @xmath21 m seen in m+t binaries , making this index complimentary to _ h_-dip . a higher value of _ h_-bump implies a larger flux at 1.55 @xmath21 m , possibly caused by the presence of a t dwarf . * _ j_-curve : designed to detect the flux coming from both the 1.05 @xmath21 m and 1.27 @xmath21 m peaks of a t dwarf , as compared to the deep methane absorption at 1.12 @xmath21 m . * _ j_-slope and _ k@xmath24_-slope : measure the slope of the peaks in the _ j _ and _ k@xmath24 _ bands at 1.27 @xmath21 m and 2.10 @xmath21 m . in both cases , the peaks in a single late - m / early - l should look somewhat flat , giving values close to one , whereas in a late - m / early - l plus t dwarf binary the slope of the _ j _ and _ k@xmath24 _ band peaks are slightly negative and positive , respectively . * h@xmath25o-_y _ : measures the prominence of the _ y_-band peak of the t dwarf at @xmath26 m compared to the water and methane absorption around @xmath27 m . m and l dwarfs do not present peaks in the _ y_-band . the thirteen indices examined are described in table [ tab : index ] . we also used _ j - k@xmath24 _ , _ j - h _ and _ h - k@xmath24 _ colors synthesized from the spectra themselves , and the source spectral type , for a total of seventeen parameters . comparing all seventeen parameters against each other yielded 136 pairings . after visual examination to determine which pairings best segregated the four known m / l+t binaries , twelve combinations were selected ( figure [ fig : paramspace ] ) . we then used two techniques to define regions of interest in each combination for candidate selection . if a trend among all sources was clear , we fit the points to a second order polynomial and defined a region demarcated in the y - axis by the + 1@xmath28 or -1@xmath28 curves from the fit function , and in the x - axis by the horizontal spread of the binary benchmarks . conversely , if the points did not indicate any trends , then the region was demarcated such that it included the four binary benchmarks . the limits to these regions are described in table [ tab : selectreg ] . objects falling in eight or more selection regions were considered strong index candidates , those falling in four to eight regions were considered weak index candidates ( figure [ fig : histogram ] ) . the number of selected sources rises steadily below four or five combinations , suggesting that sources selected fewer than four times could be spurious . three of our benchmarks were selected by all twelve combinations , while sdss j0006@xmath120852 missed only the spt / ch@xmath22-h cut , since it falls within one standard deviation from the fitting curve . in total , eight strong and twenty - two weak candidates were selected , including the previously identified spectral binaries 2mass j20261584@xmath122943124 @xcite and 2mass j13114227 + 3629235 @xcite . seven visual candidates overlapped with the index candidates : five as strong and two as weak . to statistically test the binary hypothesis for our visual and index - selected candidates , we compared each spectrum to templates of both single sources and binary systems , using the method described in @xcite . the candidates determined by visual inspection or spectral index selection were first rejected from the template pool . then , all spectra were interpolated onto a common wavelength scale from @xmath29 to @xmath30 m and normalized to the peak flux between @xmath31 m . each candidate spectrum @xmath32 $ ] was directly compared to all single templates @xmath33 $ ] and ranked by a weighted chi - squared statistic . @xmath34\left[\frac{c[\lambda]-\alpha t [ \lambda]}{\sigma_c [ \lambda]}\right]^2\ ] ] where @xmath35 $ ] is a vector of weights proportional to the wave band size of each pixel ( see @xcite ) , @xmath36 is a scaling factor minimizing @xmath37 and @xmath38 $ ] is the noise spectrum for each candidate . the statistic was computed over the wavelength range : @xmath39 m , @xmath40 m and @xmath41 m , avoiding regions of strong telluric absorption . binary templates were constructed by first scaling each template spectrum to absolute fluxes using the 2mass m@xmath42 versus spectral type relation of @xcite , and then combining all pairs of single templates , such that the spectral type of the primary was earlier than that of the secondary resulting in a total of @xmath43 binary templates . more specifically , the primary spectral type was fixed to lie between m7-l7 while the secondary spectral type ranged between t1-t8 , since types earlier than t1 do not evidence strong methane features yet . the best binary fits were ranked using a chi - squared minimization routine . we determined the true significance that a binary template is superior to a single template by comparing the @xmath37 distributions of the binary and single fits using the one - sided f - test statistic @xmath44 : @xmath45 here , dof is the degrees of freedom for each fit ( equation 2 in @xcite ) . candidates with an f - statistic falling under the @xmath46 confidence level were rejected , including five visual candidates . in particular , 2mass j14493784 + 2355378 and 2mass j14232186 + 6154005 ( also a weak index - selected candidate ) , two previously identified spectral binary candidates from @xcite and @xcite were rejected due to their low confidence level that the binary fit was statistically better than the single fit . since our template sample includes a wide range of objects such as young and unusually blue and red dwarfs , the peculiarities of these candidates may be better explained by factors other than unresolved binarity . one exception to the index selection was 2massi j1711457 + 223204 whose spex spectral type was too late to be included in the candidate sample , yet it was a visual candidate and passed the binary fit f - test . figures [ fig : strongfit ] and [ fig : weakfit ] show the best single ( left ) and binary ( right ) template fits to our strong and weak candidates . table [ tab : cand ] summarizes the results of these fits . upon further visual examination , some binary fits still proved unsatisfactory . this was the case for the blue l dwarfs 2mass j11181292@xmath120856106 , 2mass j14162409 + 1348267 , 2mass j15150083 + 4847416 , 2mass j17114558 + 40285779 , and the subdwarfs 2mass j03303847@xmath122348463 , 2mass j03301720 + 3505001 , 2mass j04024315 + 1730136 , 2mass j15412408 + 5425598 and 2mass j23311807 + 4607310 . section [ sec : blue ] discusses these issues in more detail . as a result , fourteen candidates have been recognized , of which eleven are newly identified . in an effort to balance the tradeoff between fidelity of binary candidates and completeness , we are leaning towards the former . our binary selection criteria are conservative and it is likely that other spectral binaries may be identified with slightly looser constraints . in summary , from the @xmath6800 sources compiled in the candidate sample , twelve were selected by visual inspection and thirty were selected by spectral indices . seven sources overlapped the results of these selection methods . after fitting all thirty - five candidates , seventeen were rejected due to their confidence level being lower than @xmath46 , and four more due to their unusually blue colors ( see section [ sec : blue ] ) , leading to a final count of fourteen : six strong , seven weak and one visual candidate not overlapping with the index - selected . labels of strong and weak candidates come from index selection . originally discovered by @xcite , 2mass j0236 + 0048 was classified as an l6 in the optical and l6.5 in the infrared by @xcite . in their study , @xcite comment that this object may belong to the pleiades moving group , given its proper motion of @xmath47 = [ 161.33\pm10.10 , 176.33\pm19.16]$ ] mas yr@xmath20 and agreement between photometric and moving group distances at d = 26 pc . however , @xcite reclassified this object as an l9 , reducing its spectroscopic distance to 18 pc while its strong feh band at 0.99@xmath21 m argues against low surface gravity @xcite . nevertheless , the spectrum of this source does not show any signs of youth @xcite . 2mass j0236 + 0048 is selected by eleven out of twelve spectral index combinations , and its binary fit is significantly better than its single fit , making this a strong binary candidate with [email protected] and [email protected] components . @xcite discovered sdss j0931 + 2802 in the sdss catalog and classified it as an l3 at a mean distance of 29@xmath489 pc . its spectrum shows excess flux in the _ j_-band at @xmath49 m and a noticeable dip in the _ h_-band in the vicinity of @xmath50 m , as expected for a t dwarf component . this source was selected as a visual candidate , and by eleven out of twelve spectral index combinations , and our spectral fitting predicts component types of [email protected] and [email protected] . identified as a brown dwarf candidate by , 2mass j1311 + 3629 is a peculiar l5 . while also classified as unusually blue in wavelengths longer than _ j _ band @xcite , it lacks evidence of low metallicity or h@xmath25 collision - induced absorption ( cia ) in _ h _ and _ k _ bands . @xcite identified the methane feature in the _ h _ band centered around 1.63 @xmath21 m suggesting unresolved binarity . in this study , it was selected by eleven spectral index combinations and also as a visual candidate due to its methane absorption band starting at 1.60 @xmath21 m . template fitting gives spectral types of [email protected] and [email protected] . 2mass j1341@xmath123052 was discovered by @xcite and classified as an l3 in the optical by @xcite , who also measured its parallax and distance ( @xmath51 pc ) . 2mass j1341@xmath123052 was selected by eight spectral indices , and its spectral fitting suggests component spectral types of [email protected] and [email protected] . 2mass j1453 + 1420 was classified as an l1 in both the infrared @xcite and the optical @xcite , where it clearly shows excess flux in the _ j _ band and a dip in the _ h _ band . it is selected by eleven out of twelve spectral index combinations , and it is slightly blue with a _ j - k@xmath24 _ color of [email protected] as compared to the median for * the * l1 spectral type [email protected] @xcite . it is best fit by [email protected] and [email protected] components . 2mass j2026@xmath122943 had already been identified as a spectral binary candidate by @xcite , but it failed to be resolved by keck ao , thus setting an upper limit in separation of 0@xmath1425 or a projected separation of 9 au at a distance of 36@xmath485 pc @xcite . this source clearly shows a dip in its spectrum centered at 1.63 @xmath21 m , and it is best fit by a combination of [email protected] and [email protected] components . 2mass j0206 + 2235 was discovered and classified as an l5.5 by @xcite , and characterized as a blue l dwarf by @xcite . it was selected by seven spectral index combinations and fit to [email protected] and [email protected] components . 2mass j0427@xmath121127 was discovered and classified as an m7 by . it was selected by five spectral index combinations and best fit by [email protected] and [email protected] components . 2mass j1036@xmath123441 was classified as an l6 @xcite at a distance of 21@xmath483 pc . it almost made the cut for a strong candidate , since it was selected by seven spectral index combinations . this source was best fit by components with [email protected] and [email protected] spectral types . despite not having a pronounced methane absorption feature centered at 1.63 @xmath21 m , the binary fit is significantly better than the single fit , especially at the _ j _ band peak . 2mass j1059@xmath122113 is an l1 @xcite at a distance of 32.1 @xmath482.2 pc . this source was selected by four spectral index combinations and its best binary fit yields components with [email protected] and [email protected] spectral types . its spectrum shows a strong absorption feature centered at 1.63 @xmath21 m , as well as a flux excess at 1.23@xmath21 m and 2.20@xmath21 m . sdss j1422 + 2215 was identified and classified as an l6 in the nir by @xcite and also as an unusually blue l dwarf , showing strong h@xmath25o and feh absorption bands , which may be due to subsolar metallicity and/or thinner condensate cloud decks . it was selected by four out of twelve spectral index combinations with most likely component spectral types of [email protected] and [email protected] . wise j1623@xmath120508 was classified as an l1 in the nir @xcite . this source was selected by four spectral index combinations and best fit by [email protected] and [email protected] components . 2mass j1707@xmath120138 was discovered and classified as an l2 by . selected by five spectral index combinations , its spectrum is best fit by components with [email protected] and [email protected] spectral types . its spectrum shows a strong absorption feature centered at 1.63@xmath21 m . 2mass j1711 + 2232 was first identified and classified as an l6.5 in the optical by @xcite . due to its feh and ch@xmath22 absorption features in the _ h _ band , @xcite suggested it could be a spectral binary with l5.0 and t5.5 components . we find slightly different component spectral types of [email protected] and [email protected] , yet this source was not selected by spectral indices because of its late spex spectral type of l8.8 . despite having been imaged with hst / wfpc , it remains unresolved @xcite . four of the candidates selected by spectral indices were rejected after spectral fitting due to their poor binary fits . when we investigated these sources in detail , we found they were classified as blue objects in the literature and/or showed an unusually blue spectrum . 2mass j11181292@xmath120856106 was classified as a metal - poor subdwarf by @xcite . sdss j141624.09 + 134826.7 is part of a resolved binary system with a t7.5 companion that is itself a blue outlier . @xcite rejected unresolved binarity for the primary based on a qualitative comparison to the unusually blue l dwarf 2mass j11263991@xmath125003550 . the l6 2mass j15150083 + 4847416 shows a stable rv of [email protected] km s@xmath52 @xcite and no signs of binarity from its spectrum . finally , 2mass j17114558 + 40285779 was discovered by @xcite as an unusually blue wide companion to the k star g203 - 50 . they discuss the possibility that the object may be unusual due to unresolved binarity , but argue in favor of low metallicity . for all of these sources , the lack of single templates akin to blue objects resulted in statistically better binary fits , yet the match is still relatively poor around the 1.63 @xmath21 m methane absorption feature . a few more previously unidentified nir subdwarfs were also selected as weak candidates and subsequently rejected due to their poor binary fits . the best binary fits for 2mass j03303847@xmath122348463 , 2mass j03301720 + 3505001 , 2mass j04024315 + 1730136 , 2mass j15412408 + 5425598 , and 2mass j23311807 + 4607310 use another subdwarf as a primary , which again indicates that they are part of a rare blue population that has a short supply of examples in this sample . m+t binaries have slightly bluer spectra caused by the extra flux in the _ j _ band corresponding to the peak in the t dwarfs . particularly , some sources originally classified as unusually blue have been later identified as spectral binaries ( e.g. sdss j0805 + 4812 @xcite ) . in contrast , intrinsically blue l dwarfs have low metallicity , thin cloud coverage , large - grain clouds or a combination of these , causing a blue tilt to the nir spectrum @xcite . @xcite have defined red and blue photometric outliers as the objects whose _ j - k@xmath24 _ color placed them 2@xmath28 or 0.4 mag away from the average for their spectral type , while pointing out the difficulty to distinguish outliers beyond a spectral type of l9 due to the small sample of objects . figure [ fig : j - k ] shows the _ j - k _ colors for our sample as compared to their spectral types , including the median and @xmath53 lines as calculated from the sample ( solid lines ) and reported in the literature ( dashed lines ) by @xcite and @xcite for samples of m and l dwarfs , respectively . figure [ fig : j - k ] suggests that blue l dwarfs are a major contaminant in our sample since a significant fraction of both known binaries and candidates have similar colors and thus lie in the same region as blue sources . we conclude that the blue l dwarf contaminants can be recognized if rejected due to their poor fits to binary template spectra . true confirmation of our candidates requires observational follow - up to either resolve the systems or measure rv or astrometric variability . as noted in the introduction , spectral binaries can be used to devise an unbiased method to measure the vlm binary separation distribution . therefore , it is worth examining the separation distribution of vlm and brown dwarf spectral binaries confirmed to date , to see if there are any differences compared to the resolved population . figure [ fig : separation ] shows the distribution of projected separations from 122 confirmed vlm binaries . among the observational methods for detecting binaries , such as direct imaging , radial velocity variations , astrometric variations , and microlensing , direct imaging has proven to be the most successful so far ( 73@xmath3 of confirmed vlm binaries ) , but its biggest drawback is its limit in resolution . at minimum angular scales of 0@xmath141 - 0@xmath142 for ao and hst programs , and typical distances of field brown dwarfs of 20 - 30 pc , telescope sensitivity reaches its limit at separations of around 2 - 6 au . at 2.90 au , the mean projected separation of eight independently - confirmed spectral binaries plotted in figure [ fig : separation ] falls at the lower end of this sensitivity limit , at less than the mean of known vlm binaries excluding the spectral binaries ( 3.75 au ) , raising the possibility that there may be significantly more tightly bound systems . to assess whether this is a significant difference , we performed a two - sample kolmogorov - smirnov test comparing the projected separation distributions of all binary systems to the confirmed spectral binaries . specifically , the distributions were constrained in angular separation to 50 - 500 mas , where the lower limit corresponds to the smallest possible imaging resolution in good seeing , while the upper limit restricts the maximum size of the slit . in addition , the distance was constrained to less than 30 pc , since objects that are farther away would be more difficult to confirm as binaries . in this way , we intend to fairly compare the spectral binary method to the other available methods for binary detection . these constraints reduced the number of spectral binaries to six . the result was a d statistic of 0.41 and a probability of @xmath54 . while the low probability is indicative of a difference between the samples , the small sample size makes this statistic inconclusive . many more of the existing spectral binaries need to be characterized before a significant difference can be confirmed or ruled out . we have identified fourteen brown dwarf binary candidates with late - m / early - l plus t dwarf components based on visual inspection of low resolution data , and analysis with spectral indices and template fitting . we combined five new spectral indices , with previously defined ones , spectral type , and _ j - h _ , _ h - k@xmath24 _ , and _ j - k@xmath24 _ colors to define pairings that effectively select spectral binary candidates , and confirmed them by comparison to both single and binary template spectra from the spex prism library . unusually blue l dwarfs were the main contaminant of this analysis , with four candidates classified as unusually blue but nonetheless being poorly matched to binary spectra . exploring the separation distribution of binary systems we find suggestive evidence that spectral binaries are more closely separated than other binaries , but the confirmed sample is too small to be conclusive . we are now undertaking follow - up ao imaging and rv monitoring of these candidates to confirm them and measure orbital properties . the authors thank telescope operators for their assistance during our observations . dbg would like to thank the friends of the international center at ucsd for their generous scholarship as well as davy kirkpatrick and fellow graduate students alex mendez and david vidmar for their helpful discussion and coding tips . this publication makes use of data from the spex prism spectral libraries , maintained by adam burgasser at http://www.browndwarfs.org/spexprism ; the dwarf archives compendium , maintained by chris gelino at http://dwarfarchives.org ; and the vlm binaries archive maintained by nick siegler at http://vlmbinaries.org . the authors wish to recognize and acknowledge the very significant cultural role and reverence that the summit of mauna kea has always had within the indigenous hawaiian community . we are most fortunate to have the opportunity to conduct observations from this mountain . + _ facilities : _ irtf ( spex ) . lccccccccccc sdss j000649.16 - 085246.3 & m9 & & [email protected] & t5@xmath481 & [email protected] & [email protected] & [email protected] & [email protected] & rv & 2 ; 2 + ulas j004757.41 + 154641.4 & & [email protected] & l8.0 & t7.0 & [email protected] & [email protected] & & @xmath55 & & 22 + 2mass j00521232 + 0012172 & l5 & & l4 & t3 & [email protected] & [email protected] & & @xmath56 & & 24 + sdss j011912.22 + 240331.6 & & t2 & [email protected] & [email protected] & [email protected] & @xmath57 & [email protected] & @xmath58 & & 21 + ulas j020529.62 + 142114.0 & & [email protected] & t1.0 & t3.0 & [email protected] & [email protected] & & @xmath59 & & 22 + 2mass j02060879 + 22355930 & & l5.5 & [email protected] & [email protected] & [email protected] & [email protected] & [email protected] & & & 26 + 2mass j02361794 + 0048548 & l6.5 & & [email protected] & [email protected] & [email protected] & [email protected] & [email protected] & @xmath60 & & 26 + sdss j024749.90 - 163112.6 & & [email protected] & [email protected] & [email protected] & [email protected] & [email protected] & [email protected] & @xmath61 & & 21 + 2mass j03202839 - 0446358 & m8 : & l1 & [email protected] & [email protected] & [email protected] & [email protected] & [email protected] & @xmath62 & rv & 5 ; 1 + sdss j035104.37 + 481046.8 & & [email protected] & [email protected] & [email protected] & [email protected] & [email protected] & [email protected] & @xmath63 & & 21 + denis - p j04272708 - 1127143 & & dm7 & [email protected] & [email protected] & 13.74 & [email protected] & [email protected] & & & 26 + 2mass j05185995 - 2828372 & & & l6 & t4 & [email protected] & [email protected] & [email protected] & [email protected] & di & 10 ; 7 + 2mass j07354882 + 2720167 & l1 & & l1 & l4 & [email protected] & [email protected] & & @xmath64 & & 23 + sdss j080531.84 + 481233.0 & l4 & l9.5 & l4.5 & t5 & [email protected] & [email protected] & [email protected] & 0.9 - 2.3 & av & 6 ; 11 + sdss j090900.73 + 652527.2 & & t1.5 & [email protected] & [email protected] & [email protected] & [email protected] & [email protected] & @xmath65 & & 21 + sdss j092615.38 + 584720.9 & t4.5 & & t3 & t6 & [email protected] & @xmath66 & [email protected] & [email protected] & di & 16 ; 7 , 8 + sdss j093113.23 + 280227.1 & l3 & & [email protected] & [email protected] & [email protected] & [email protected] & [email protected] & @xmath67 & & 26 + 2mass j09490860 - 1545485 & & t2 & [email protected] & [email protected] & [email protected] & [email protected] & [email protected] & @xmath68 & & 21 + 2mass j10365305 - 3441380 & l6 & & [email protected] & [email protected] & [email protected] & [email protected] & [email protected] & @xmath69 & & 26 + sdss j103931.35 + 325625.5 & & t1 & [email protected] & [email protected] & [email protected] & [email protected] & [email protected] & @xmath63 & & 21 + 2mass j10595138 - 2113082 & l1 & & [email protected] & [email protected] & [email protected] & [email protected] & [email protected] & @xmath1552.5 & & 26 + 2mass j11061197 + 2754225 & & t2.5 & [email protected] & [email protected] & [email protected] & [email protected] & [email protected] & @xmath152.67 & ol & 4 , 14 ; 15 + sdss j120747.17 + 024424.8 & l8 & t0 & [email protected] & [email protected] & [email protected] & [email protected] & [email protected] & @xmath1517 & & 21 + 2mass j12144089 + 6316434 & & t3.5 & t2 & t6 & [email protected] & [email protected] & & @xmath1524 & & 24 + 2mass j13114227 + 3629235 & l5pec & & [email protected] & [email protected] & [email protected] & [email protected] & [email protected] & @xmath70 & & 27 + 2mass j13153094 - 2649513 & l5 & & [email protected] & [email protected] & [email protected] & [email protected] & [email protected] & [email protected] & di & 3 ; 3 + 2mass j13243559 + 6358284 & & t2 : & [email protected] & [email protected] & [email protected] & [email protected] & [email protected] & @xmath71 & & 21,2 4 + 2mass j13411160 - 30525049 & l3 & & [email protected] & [email protected] & [email protected] & [email protected] & [email protected] & @xmath72 & & 26 + sdss j141530.05 + 572428.7 & & t3@xmath481 & [email protected] & [email protected] & [email protected] & @xmath73 & [email protected] & @xmath1529 & & 21 + sdss j142227.20 + 221557.5 & l6.5 & & [email protected] & [email protected] & [email protected] & [email protected] & [email protected] & @xmath58 & & 26 + 2mass j14232186 + 6154005 & l4 & & l2 & l5 & [email protected] & [email protected] & & & & & 23 + sdss j143553.25 + 112948.6 & & t2@xmath481 & [email protected] & [email protected] & [email protected] & @xmath74 & [email protected] & @xmath72 & & 21 + sdss j143945.86 + 304220.6 & & t2.5 & [email protected] & [email protected] & [email protected] & @xmath75 & [email protected] & @xmath76 & & 21 + 2mass j14532589 + 1420418 & l1 & & [email protected] & [email protected] & [email protected] & [email protected] & [email protected] & @xmath77 & & 26 + sdss j151114.66 + 060742.9 & & t0@xmath482 & [email protected] & [email protected] & [email protected] & [email protected] & [email protected] & @xmath1521 & ol & 4 ; 12 + sdss j151603.03 + 025928.9 & & t0 : & [email protected] & [email protected] & [email protected] & [email protected] & [email protected] & @xmath1527 & & 21 , 24 + wise j16235970 - 0508114 & & l1 & [email protected] & [email protected] & [email protected] & [email protected] & [email protected] & & & 26 + 2mass j17072529 - 0138093 & & & [email protected] & [email protected] & [email protected] & [email protected] & [email protected] & @xmath78 & & 26 + 2massi j17114573 + 2232044 & l6.5 & & [email protected] & [email protected] & [email protected] & [email protected] & [email protected] & @xmath79 & & 21 + 2mass j17310140 + 5310476 & l6 & & l5 & l8 & [email protected] & [email protected] & & @xmath1548 & & 23,24 + 2mass j17373467 + 5953434 & l9 & & l5 & t5 & [email protected] & [email protected] & & @xmath80 & & 23 + 2mass j20261584 - 2943124 & l1 : & & [email protected] & [email protected] & [email protected] & [email protected] & [email protected] & @xmath159.00 & di & 13 + sdss j205235.31 - 160929.8 & & t1@xmath481 & [email protected] & [email protected] & [email protected] & [email protected] & [email protected] & [email protected] & di & 4 ; 17 + 2mass j21265916 + 7617440 & l7 & t0 & l7 & t3.5 & [email protected] & [email protected] & & & & 28 + 2mass j21392676 + 0220226 & & t1.5 & [email protected] & [email protected] & [email protected] & [email protected] & @xmath810.21 & @xmath82 & & 21 + ulas j222958.30 + 010217.2 & & [email protected] & t1.0 & t5.0 & [email protected] & [email protected] & & @xmath83 & & 22 + ulas j223348.82 + 002214.0 & & [email protected] & l5.0 & t4.0 & [email protected] & [email protected] & & @xmath84 & & 22 + ulas j235618.01 + 075420.4 & & [email protected] & l7.0 & t7.0 & [email protected] & [email protected] & & @xmath85 & & 22 + ulas j232315.39 + 071931.0 & & [email protected] & t0.0 & t2.0 & [email protected] & [email protected] & & @xmath56 & & 22 + kelu-1a & [email protected] & [email protected] & [email protected] & t7.5@xmath481 & [email protected] & [email protected] & & @xmath86 & & 25 + lllllccccl 2mass j0000286 - 124515 & j00002867 - 1245153 & m8.5 & & m9.2 & 13.20 & 1.23 & 2013 aug 14 & 120 & 44 ; 44 + lehpm 1 - 162 & j00054768 - 2157176 & m8.5 & m8 & m8.7 & 13.27 & 1.07 & 2006 sep 03 & 120 & 32 ; 75 + 2massi j0006205 - 172051 & j00062050 - 1720506 & l2.5 & & l3.0 & 15.66 & 1.65 & 2008 sep 08 & 120 & 25 ; 25 + sdss j000632.60 + 140606.4 & j00063260 + 1406064 & l1 & & l0.4 & 15.85 & 0.79 & 2009 jun 30 & 120 & 48 ; 48 + sdss j000646.81 + 151225.8 & j00064681 + 1512258 & l4 : : & & l4.3 & 16.22 & 1.41 & 2013 sep 03 & 120 & 62 ; 62 + 2mass j0007078 - 245804 & j00070787 - 2458042 & m7 & & m7.7 & 13.12 & 1.05 & 2013 oct 23 & 120 & 44 ; 44 + 2mass j00100009 - 2031122 & j00100009 - 2031122 & l0 & & m8.8 : & 14.13 & 1.25 & 2008 jul 14 & 120 & 44 ; 44 + 2massi j0013578 - 223520 & j00135779 - 2235200 & l4 & & l5.7 & 15.78 & 1.74 & 2009 nov 04 & 120 & 25 ; 25 + 2massw j0015447 + 351603 & j00154476 + 3516026 & l2 & & l1.0 & 13.88 & 1.61 & 2008 sep 08 & 120 & 13 ; 13 + sdss j001608.44 - 004302.3 & j00160843 - 00430209 & & l5.5 & l4.3 & 16.33 & 1.78 & 2013 sep 03 & 120 & 34 ; 34 + sdss j001637.62 - 103911.2 & j00163762 - 1039112 & l0 & & m8.9 & 15.46 & 0.92 & 2009 nov 04 & 120 & 48 ; 48 + sdss j001911.65 + 003017.8 & j00191165 + 0030176 & l1 & & l0.4 & 14.92 & 1.35 & 2009 nov 07 & 120 & 20 ; 20 + denis - p j0020.9 - 4414 & j00205982 - 4414340 & m8v & & m9.4 & 14.90 & 1.19 & 2007 nov 10 & 120 & 6 ; 6 + lehpm 1 - 494b & j00210589 - 4244433 & m9.5 & & l0.6 : & 13.52 & 1.22 & 2006 aug 28 & 120 & 6 ; 15 + sdss j00220934 - 0110397 & j00220934 - 0110397 & l0 & & m8.9 & 15.82 & 1.12 & 2012 sep 27 & 120 & 60 ; 60 + bri 0021 - 0214 & j00242514 - 0158166 & m9.5 & & l0.6 & 11.99 & 1.45 & 2007 jul 04 & 120 & 80 ; 44 + & & & & & & & 2008 jul 14 & 120 & 80 ; 44 + lhs 1074 & j00255117 - 0748069 & sdm6 & & m7.9 & 14.68 & 0.81 & 2004 sep 08 & 120 & ; 39 + lehpm 1 - 606 & j00271049 - 1813083 & & m8 & m7.5 & 13.45 & 1.02 & 2006 sep 03 & 120 & 32 ; 75 + 2massi j0028394 + 150141 & j00283943 + 1501418 & l4.5 & l3 & l6.1 : & 16.51 & 1.95 & 2009 dec 07 & 120 & 13 ; 13 , 34 + 2mass j00285545 - 1927165 & j00285545 - 1927165 & l0 : & & l0.7 & 14.19 & 1.35 & 2009 nov 04 & 120 & 49 ; 49 + 2massw j0030438 + 313932 & j00304384 + 3139321 & l2 & & l3.2 & 15.48 & 1.45 & 2008 sep 08 & 120 & 11 ; 11 + sips j0031 - 3840 & j00311925 - 3840356 & l2.5 & l2 & l1.2 & 14.10 & 1.18 & 2006 aug 28 & 120 & 36 ; 59 , 36 + 2mass j00320509 + 0219017 & j00320509 + 0219017 & l1.5 & m9 & l0.4 & 14.32 & 1.52 & 2009 jun 30 & 120 & 49 ; 49 , 30 + & & & & & & & 2009 nov 07 & 120 & 49 ; 49 , 30 + 2massi j0032431 - 223727 & j00324308 - 2237272 & l1 & & m9.7 : & 15.39 & 1.43 & 2009 dec 07 & 120 & 25 ; 25 + eros - mp j0032 - 4405 & j00325584 - 4405058 & l0gamma & & l0.5 & 14.78 & 1.51 & 2008 sep 07 & 120 & 8 ; 56 + 2massi j0034568 - 070601 & j00345684 - 0706013 & l3 & & l4.3 & 15.53 & 1.59 & 2009 nov 07 & 120 & 25 ; 25 + sdss j003843.99 + 134339.5 & j00384397 + 13433950 & l1 & & l0.6 & 15.91 & 1.15 & 2012 sep 27 & 120 & 20 ; 20 + sdss j004154.54 + 134135.5 & j00415453 + 1341351 & l0 & & l0.6 & 14.45 & 1.22 & 2009 jan 24 & 120 & 20 ; 20 + & & & & & & & 2009 nov 08 & 120 & 20 ; 20 + lhs 1135 & j00433134 + 2054316 & sdm6.5 & & m7.0 & 13.95 & 0.81 & 2004 jul 24 & 120 & ; 39 + 2massw j0045214 + 163445 & j00452143 + 1634446 & l2beta & l3.5 & l1.3 : : & 13.06 & 1.69 & 2007 sep 16 & 120 & 30 ; 56 , 30 + 2mass j00464841 + 0715177 & j00464841 + 0715177 & l0 : : & m9 & m9.5 : & 13.89 & 1.34 & 2008 jul 13 & 120 & 30 ; 49 , 30 + sips j0050 - 1538 & j00502444 - 1538184 & l1 : & & l0.5 & 13.78 & 1.13 & 2008 sep 08 & 120 & 36 ; 44 + sdssp j005406.55 - 003101.8 & j00540654 - 00310180 & l1 & & l2.2 & 15.73 & 1.35 & 2012 sep 25 & 120 & 19 ; 20 + 2mass j00550460 - 3052000 & j00550460 - 3052000 & m8 : & & m7.2 & 13.03 & 1.12 & 2012 dec 27 & 120 & ; + lhs 1166 & j00554418 + 2506235 & sdm6.5 & & m7.2 & 14.26 & 0.69 & 2004 sep 07 & 120 & ; 39 + sdss j00570556 - 0846241 & j00570556 - 0846241 & l0 & & m9.3 & 15.70 & 1.34 & 2012 sep 25 & 120 & 60 ; 60 + 2massw j0058425 - 065123 & j00584253 - 0651239 & l0 & & l0.0 & 14.31 & 1.41 & 2008 jul 14 & 120 & 13 ; 13 + lhs 132 & j0102510 - 373743 & m8 & & m8.1 & 11.13 & 1.06 & 2008 sep 07 & 120 & ; + sdss j010311.51 - 004417.0 & j01031151 - 0044170 & m9.5 & & m8.5 & 14.29 & 1.12 & 2013 oct 29 & 120 & 62 ; 62 + 2massi j0103320 + 193536 & j01033203 + 1935361 & l6 & & l5.4 & 16.29 & 2.14 & 2006 sep 02 & 120 & 13 ; 13 + 2massi j0104075 - 005328 & j01040750 - 0053283 & l4.5 & & l5.8 : & 16.53 & 1.20 & 2009 nov 07 & 120 & 29 ; 81 + sdss j010637.33 + 151855.0 & j01063733 + 1518550 & m8.5 & m8 pec & m9.2 & 14.36 & 0.93 & 2013 sep 03 & 120 & 62 ; 62 , 66 + sdss j01071600 - 1517570 & j01071600 - 1517570 & m7 & & m7.2 & 13.34 & 1.06 & 2012 dec 27 & 120 & ; + sdssp j010752.33 + 004156.1 & j01075242 + 0041563 & l8 & l5.5 & l6.6 & 15.82 & 2.12 & 2005 oct 19 & 120 & 21 ; 20 , 34 + sdss j01084048 + 1347392 & j01084048 + 1347392 & l0 & & m9.3 & & & 2012 sep 27 & 120 & 60 ; 60 + 2mass j01165457 - 1357342 & j01165457 - 1357342 & m9 & & m8.8 & 14.21 & 1.24 & 2009 nov 08 & 120 & 49 ; 49 + 2mass j01170586 + 1752568 & j01170586 + 1752568 & m9 & m8 & m8.6 & 14.14 & 1.20 & 2009 nov 04 & 120 & 61 ; 61 + ssspm j0124 - 4240 & j01235905 - 4240073 & m8 & l2.5 & m8.4 & 13.15 & 1.12 & 2008 sep 07 & 120 & 37 ; 49 , 37 + 2massi j0125369 - 343505 & j01253689 - 3435049 & l2 & & l1.2 & 15.52 & 1.62 & 2008 sep 07 & 120 & 25 ; 25 + 2mass j01273917 + 2805536 & j01273917 + 2805536 & m8.5 & & m9.3 & 14.04 & 1.18 & 2013 aug 14 & 120 & ; + sdss j012743.51 + 135420.9 & j01274352 + 13542099 & l5 & l6+/-1 & l5.5 & 16.83 & 1.40 & 2012 sep 25 & 120 & 20 ; 20 , 34 + 2massw j0129122 + 351758 & j01291221 + 3517580 & l4 & & l4.7 & 16.78 & 2.08 & 2009 nov 07 & 120 & 11 ; 11 + 2mass j01335299 + 0033017 & j01335299 + 0033017 & m9 : & & m9.1 & 15.84 & 1.21 & 2009 jan 24 & 120 & 62 ; 62 + nltt 5282 & j0134592 - 090442 & esdm9.5 ? & & m8.8 & 15.25 & 0.49 & 2008 jul 14 & 120 & ; + 2massw j0135358 + 120522 & j01353586 + 1205216 & l1.5 & & l0.6 & 14.41 & 1.49 & 2009 nov 04 & 120 & 13 ; 13 + 2massw j0141032 + 180450 & j01410321 + 1804502 & l1 & l4.5 & l0.8 & 13.88 & 1.38 & 2008 sep 07 & 120 & 30 ; 44 , 30 + 2mass j01460119 - 4545263 & j01460119 - 4545263 & m9 & & m9.5 & 14.40 & 1.36 & 2008 oct 12 & 120 & 49 ; 49 + & & & & & & & 2009 dec 07 & 120 & 49 ; 49 + 2massw j0147334 + 345311 & j01473344 + 3453112 & l0.5 & & l1.0 & 14.95 & 1.37 & 2008 sep 08 & 120 & 11 ; 11 + 2mass j01490895 + 2956131 & j01490895 + 2956131 & m9.5 & & m9.7 & 13.45 & 1.47 & 2008 sep 07 & 120 & ; + sdss j01535423 + 1404528 & j01535423 + 1404528 & l0 & & m9.0 & 15.21 & 1.25 & 2012 sep 27 & 120 & 60 ; 60 + lehpm 2153 & j02042212 - 3632308 & m8 : & & m8.1 & 13.27 & 1.08 & 2013 dec 05 & 120 & 49 ; 49 + sdss j020608.97 + 223559.2 & j02060879 + 22355930 & & l5.5 & l6.9 : & 16.56 & 1.39 & 2013 dec 05 & 120 & 40 ; 40 + denis j02065660 - 0735190 & j02065660 - 0735190 & m8.5 & & m8.5 & 14.34 & 1.35 & 2013 aug 14 & 120 & 59 ; 59 + sdss j020735.60 + 135556.3 & j02073556 + 13555639 & l3 & l3+/-1.5 & l0.6 & 15.46 & 1.65 & 2012 sep 27 & 120 & 20 ; 20 , 34 + 2massw j0208549 + 250048 & j02085498 + 25004880 & l5 & & l5.9 & 16.21 & 1.80 & 2012 sep 25 & 120 & 13 ; 13 + 2massi j0218291 - 313322 & j02182913 - 3133230 & l3 & & l3.8 & 14.73 & 1.57 & 2009 nov 08 & 120 & 27 ; 27 + 2mass j02192196 + 0506306 & j02192196 + 0506306 & l1 : & l1 & l3.0 & 14.97 & 1.49 & 2008 sep 23 & 120 & ; 55 + ssspm j0219 - 1939 & j02192807 - 1938416 & l1 & l2.5 & l0.6 & 14.11 & 1.20 & 2008 sep 08 & 120 & 83 ; 37 + 2massi j0224367 + 253704 & j02243669 + 25370419 & l2 & & l2.3 & 16.58 & 1.89 & 2012 sep 27 & 120 & 13 ; 13 + 2mass j02284243 + 1639329 & j02284243 + 16393299 & l0 : & & m8.7 & 13.17 & 1.35 & 2012 oct 27 & 120 & 49 ; 49 + 2mass j02301551 + 2704061 & j02301551 + 2704061 & l0 : & & m9.4 & 14.29 & 1.31 & 2008 sep 07 & 120 & 44 ; 44 + denis j02304500 - 0953050 & j02304500 - 0953050 & l0 & & l0.9 & 14.68 & 1.69 & 2013 aug 14 & 120 & 59 ; 59 + sdss j023547.56 - 084919.8 & j02354755 - 08491980 & l2 & & l2.0 : & 15.57 & 1.38 & 2012 sep 27 & 120 & 20 ; 20 + sdssp j023617.93 + 004855.0 & j02361793 + 00485479 & l6 & l6.5 & l6.6 : & 16.10 & 1.43 & 2012 sep 25 & 120 & 21 ; 20 , 34 + 2massi j0239424 - 173547 & j02394245 - 1735471 & l0 & & m9.0 & 14.29 & 1.25 & 2009 nov 08 & 120 & 27 ; 27 + 2massi j0241536 - 124106 & j02415367 - 1241069 & l2 : & & l1.9 & 15.61 & 1.67 & 2008 sep 08 & 120 & 27 ; 27 + 2massw j0242435 + 160739 & j02424354 + 16073920 & l1.5 & & l1.7 & 15.78 & 1.43 & 2012 oct 27 & 120 & 11 ; 11 + sdss j02511323 + 00473631 & j02511323 + 00473631 & m8 & & m8.2 & 13.77 & 1.09 & 2013 sep 03 & 120 & 48 ; 48 + 2mass j02522628 + 0056220 & j02522628 + 0056220 & m8 & & m8.3 & 13.13 & 1.16 & 2012 dec 27 & 120 & ; + sdss j02540582 - 1934523 & j02540582 - 1934523 & m9 & m9 & m8.1 & 13.08 & 1.17 & 2009 jan 25 & 120 & 49 ; 85 + & & & & & & & 2012 dec 27 & 120 & 49 ; 85 + 2mass j02594471 + 2254443 & j02594471 + 2254443 & m9 & & m9.5 & 14.11 & 1.25 & 2009 dec 07 & 120 & 49 ; 49 + 2massi j0302012 + 135814 & j03020121 + 13581419 & l3 & & l2.7 : & 16.53 & 1.90 & 2005 oct 19 & 120 & 13 ; 13 + & & & & & & & 2012 sep 27 & 120 & 13 ; 13 + lehpm 1 - 3070 & j03061185 - 3647417 & m8 & l0 & m8.7 & 11.69 & 1.06 & 2006 sep 03 & 120 & 32 ; 37 + 2massw j0306268 + 154514 & j03062684 + 15451370 & l6 : & & l6.0 : & 17.11 & 1.97 & 2012 sep 25 & 120 & 13 ; 13 + sdss j03083243 - 08105138 & j03083243 - 08105138 & m8 & & m7.6 & 14.98 & 0.89 & 2013 sep 03 & 120 & 48 ; 48 + 2massw j0309088 - 194938 & j03090888 - 19493870 & l4.5 & & l4.9 & 15.75 & 1.69 & 2012 sep 25 & 120 & 13 ; 13 + 2mass j03101401 - 2756452 & j03101401 - 2756452 & l5 & & l6.5 & 15.80 & 1.84 & 2009 nov 08 & 120 & 44 ; 44 + 2mass j03140344 + 1603056 & j03140344 + 16030560 & l0 & & m9.4 & 12.53 & 1.29 & 2012 sep 25 & 120 & 49 ; 49 + 2massi j0316451 - 284852 & j03164511 - 28485209 & l0 : & & l1.0 & 14.57 & 1.46 & 2013 dec 05 & 120 & 27 ; 27 + 2mass j03201710 - 1026120 & j03201710 - 1026120 & m8 & & m7.6 & 13.87 & 1.15 & 2013 aug 14 & 120 & 44 ; 44 + 2mass j03250136 + 2253039 & j03250136 + 22530390 & l3 & & l3.3 & 15.43 & 1.65 & 2013 sep 03 & 120 & 44 ; 44 + 2massw j0326137 + 295015 & j03261367 + 2950152 & l3.5 & & l4.6 & 15.48 & 1.65 & 2009 dec 07 & 120 & 11 ; 11 + 2mass j03264453 + 1919309 & j03264453 + 1919309 & m8.5 & & m8.6 & 13.12 & & 2012 sep 25 & 120 & 49 ; 49 + sdssp j032817.38 + 003257.2 & j03281737 + 00325719 & l3 & & l2.5 : & 15.99 & 1.83 & 2012 sep 27 & 120 & 19 ; 20 + lspm j0330 + 3504b & j03301720 + 3505001 & & d / sdm7 & m8.6 & 16.00 & 0.68 & 2005 oct 17 & 120 & ; 75 + & & & & & & & 2005 dec 31 & 120 & ; 75 + sdssp j033035.13 - 002534.5 & j03303511 - 0025346 & l4 & & l6.5 & 15.31 & 1.47 & 2009 nov 04 & 120 & 12 ; 20 + lehpm 1 - 3365 & j03303847 - 2348463 & & esdm7 & m8.8 & 15.80 & 0.86 & 2004 sep 09 & 120 & 32 ; 75 + 2mass j03320043 - 2317496 & j03320043 - 2317496 & m8 & & m8.4 & 13.64 & 1.10 & 2013 oct 29 & 120 & 49 ; 49 + 2mass j03335134 + 0014068 & j03335134 + 0014068 & sdl & & m7.6 & 16.43 & -0.35 & 2013 dec 05 & 120 & 62 ; 62 + lehpm 1 - 3396 & j03340904 - 4953382 & & m8 & m9.4 & 11.38 & 0.98 & 2004 sep 06 & 120 & 32 ; 75 + 2mass j03350236 + 2342407 & j03350236 + 2342407 & m8.5 & & m7.4 & 12.25 & 0.99 & 2013 dec 05 & 120 & 14 ; 67 + 2mass j03354535 + 0658058 & j03354535 + 0658058 & m8 & & m8.0 & 13.41 & 1.15 & 2012 oct 27 & 120 & 49 ; 49 + 2massw j0337036 - 175807 & j03370359 - 1758079 & l4.5 & & l6.0 : & 15.62 & 2.04 & 2009 nov 08 & 120 & 13 ; 13 + 2mass j03395284 + 2457270 & j03395284 + 2457270 & m8 & & m7.7 & 12.84 & 1.10 & 2012 dec 27 & 120 & ; + sdss j03440891 + 0111249 & j03440891 + 0111249 & l1 & & l2.9 : & 14.74 & 1.22 & 2012 oct 27 & 120 & 60 ; 60 + sdss j03510002 - 00524587 & j03510002 - 00524587 & m8 & & m7.3 & 11.30 & 1.07 & 2012 oct 27 & 120 & 48 ; 48 + 2mass j03521086 + 0210479 & j03521086 + 02104797 & m9 & l0+/-1 & m8.6 & 13.08 & 1.12 & 2012 oct 27 & 120 & 47 ; 49 , 47 + sdss j035308.54 + 103056.0 & j03530854 + 1030560 & l1 & & l0.9 & 15.45 & 1.27 & 2013 oct 29 & 120 & 60 ; 60 + 2mass j03540135 + 2316330 & j03540135 + 2316330 & m8 & & m7.9 & 13.12 & 1.13 & 2012 dec 27 & 120 & ; + lehpm 2 - 471 & j03551067 - 1858173 & & m7 & m7.6 & 13.81 & 0.93 & 2006 sep 03 & 120 & 32 ; 75 + 2mass j0355201 + 143929 & j0355201 + 143929 & m8 & & m8.8 & 13.81 & 1.11 & 2013 oct 29 & 120 & 44 ; 44 + 2mass j03552337 + 1133437 & j03552337 + 1133437 & l5gamma & & l4.8 : : & 14.05 & 2.52 & 2009 dec 07 & 120 & 49 ; 56 + 2massw j0355419 + 225702 & j03554190 + 22570159 & l3 & & l2.9 : & 16.11 & 1.83 & 2012 sep 27 & 120 & 11 ; 11 + denis - p j035729.6 - 441730 & j03572695 - 4417305 & l0beta & & l0.6 : & 14.37 & 1.46 & 2007 sep 16 & 120 & 38 ; 56 + 2mass j04012977 - 4050448 & j04012977 - 40504488 & l0 : & & l0.0 & 14.53 & 1.36 & 2012 dec 27 & 120 & 49 ; 49 + lspm j0402 + 1730 & j04024315 + 1730136 & & sdm7 & m7.0 & 15.59 & 0.56 & 2005 oct 17 & 120 & ; 75 + & & & & & & & 2005 dec 31 & 120 & ; 75 + 2mass j04070752 + 1546457 & j04070752 + 1546457 & l3.5 & & l3.9 & 15.48 & 1.92 & 2009 dec 07 & 120 & 49 ; 49 + 2mass j0407089 - 234829 & j0407089 - 234829 & m8 : & & m8.5 & 13.77 & 1.15 & 2013 oct 29 & 120 & 44 ; 44 + 2mass j04081032 + 0742494 & j04081032 + 0742494 & m8 & & m8.1 & 13.59 & 1.17 & 2013 dec 05 & 120 & 49 ; 49 + 2massi j0408290 - 145033 & j04082905 - 1450334 & l2 & l4.5 & l1.3 & 14.22 & 1.40 & 2009 nov 04 & 120 & 30 ; 27 , 30 + 2massi j0409095 + 210439 & j04090950 + 2104393 & l3 & & l3.4 & 15.51 & 1.66 & 2009 dec 07 & 120 & 13 ; 13 + 2mass j0417474 - 212919 & j0417474 - 212919 & m8 & & m8.3 & 13.85 & 1.18 & 2013 oct 29 & 120 & 44 ; 44 + sdss j04270723 + 0859027 & j04270723 + 0859027 & m8 & & m8.8 & 12.92 & 1.19 & 2012 dec 27 & 120 & ; + denis j0427270 - 112713 & j04272708 - 1127143 & m7 & & m7.9 & 13.74 & 1.07 & 2013 dec 05 & 120 & 59 ; 59 + 2massi j0428510 - 225323 & j04285095 - 22532270 & l0.5 & & m9.9 & 13.51 & 1.39 & 2012 sep 25 & 120 & 25 ; 25 + lp 655 - 23b & j04305157 - 0849007 & m8 & & m8.5 & 12.90 & 1.12 & 2013 dec 05 & 120 & 28 ; 46 + lp 775 - 31 & j0435161 - 160657 & & m7 & m8.0 & 10.41 & 1.05 & 2004 sep 07 & 120 & ; + 2mass j04362054 - 4218523 & j04362054 - 42185236 & l0 : & & l0.4 & 14.49 & 1.35 & 2012 dec 27 & 120 & 49 ; 49 + 2massi j0443058 - 320209 & j04430581 - 32020899 & l5 & & l6.4 : & 15.27 & 1.40 & 2012 sep 27 & 120 & 25 ; 25 + sdss j044337.61 + 000205.1 & j04433761 + 0002051 & m9 & & m9.0 & 12.51 & 1.29 & 2013 dec 05 & 120 & 20 ; 44 + 2mass 04441479 + 0543573 & j04441479 + 0543573 & m8 & & m7.9 & 13.67 & 1.15 & 2013 dec 05 & 120 & 49 ; 49 + 2massi j0451009 - 340214 & j04510092 - 34021500 & l0.5 & & l0.6 & 13.54 & 1.25 & 2012 sep 27 & 120 & 27 ; 27 + 2massi j0453264 - 175154 & j04532647 - 1751543 & l3 : & & l3.1 & 15.14 & 1.68 & 2009 nov 04 & 120 & 27 ; 27 + 2mass j05002100 + 0330501 & j05002099 + 03305010 & l4 & & l4.1 & 13.67 & 1.61 & 2012 dec 27 & 120 & 49 ; 49 + 2massi j0502134 + 144236 & j05021345 + 1442367 & l0 & & m8.9 & 14.27 & 1.32 & 2013 dec 05 & 120 & 60 ; 55 + 2mass j05120636 - 2949540 & j05120636 - 29495400 & l4.5 & & l5.7 : : & 15.46 & 2.18 & 2013 oct 29 & 120 & 27 ; 52 + 2mass j05170548 - 4154413 & j05170548 - 4154413 & m9 & & m8.8 & 13.46 & 1.19 & 2012 dec 27 & 120 & ; + lehpm 2 - 183 & j05173729 - 3348593 & m8 & m9 & m9.4 & 12.00 & 1.17 & 2004 sep 06 & 120 & 32 ; 27 , 75 + 2mass j05184616 - 2756457 & j05184616 - 2756457 & l0 : & & l1.0 & 15.26 & 1.65 & 2009 jan 25 & 120 & 44 ; 44 + 2mass j05264348 - 4455455 & j05264348 - 4455455 & m9.5 & & m9.8 & 14.08 & 1.38 & 2013 dec 12 & 120 & 49 ; 49 + 2mass j05301261 + 6253254 & j05301261 + 6253254 & l1 & & l1.1 & 14.05 & 1.34 & 2008 jan 09 & 120 & 49 ; 49 + 2mass j0534584 - 151143 & j0534584 - 151143 & m9 & & m8.9 & 13.15 & 1.15 & 2013 oct 29 & 120 & 44 ; 44 + sdssp j053951.99 - 005902.0 & j05395199 - 00590189 & l5 & l5 & l5.0 & 14.03 & 1.51 & 2009 jan 24 & 120 & 12 ; 12 , 34 + 2mass j05431887 + 6422528 & j05431887 + 6422528 & l1 & & l1.2 & 13.57 & 1.52 & 2008 jan 09 & 120 & 49 ; 49 + 2mass j05441150 - 2433010 & j05441150 - 2433010 & m8 & & m7.6 & 12.53 & 1.07 & 2012 dec 27 & 120 & ; + 2mass j06022216 + 6336391 & j06022216 + 6336391 & l1 : & & l1.5 & 14.27 & 1.58 & 2008 jan 08 & 120 & 49 ; 49 + lsr 0602 + 3910 & j06023045 + 3910592 & l1 & & l0.8 & 12.30 & 1.44 & 2009 nov 04 & 120 & 88 ; 88 + 2mass j06050190 - 2342260 & j06050190 - 2342260 & l0 : & & m9.8 & 14.51 & 1.37 & 2012 dec 27 & 120 & 44 ; 44 + 2mass j06050196 - 2342270 & j06050190 - 2342260 & l0 : & & l1.1 : & 14.51 & 1.37 & 2009 jan 25 & 120 & 44 ; 44 + 2mass j06085283 - 2753583 & j06085283 - 2753583 & m8.5 low g & l0 lg & m9.6 & 3.600 & -8.78 & 2006 sep 02 & 120 & 27 ; 59 , 71 + sips j0614 - 2019 & j06141196 - 2019181 & & l4 & l1.3 & 14.78 & 1.41 & 2006 sep 01 & 120 & ; 72 + denis - p j0615493 - 010041 & j06154934 - 01004158 & l2+/-1 & & l1.0 & 13.75 & 1.21 & 2010 jan 02 & 120 & 53 ; 53 + & & & & & & & 2012 dec 27 & 120 & 53 ; 53 + 2mass j06244595 - 4521548 & j06244595 - 45215479 & l5 : & & l5.1 & 14.48 & 1.88 & 2013 oct 29 & 120 & 49 ; 49 + sdss j062621.22 + 002934.2 & j06262121 + 00293410 & l1 & & l0.3 & 15.93 & 1.07 & 2010 jan 02 & 120 & 20 ; 20 + 2mass j06411840 - 4322329 & j06411839 - 43223290 & l1.5 & & l2.4 : & 13.75 & 1.30 & 2012 dec 27 & 120 & 49 ; 49 + denis - p j0652197 - 253450 & j06521977 - 25345058 & l0 & & m9.2 & 12.76 & 1.24 & 2009 jan 25 & 120 & 53 ; 53 + & & & & & & & 2009 nov 04 & 120 & 53 ; 53 + denis - p j0652197 - 253450 & j06521977 - 2534505 & l0 & & m9.2 & 12.76 & 1.24 & 2006 sep 02 & 120 & 53 ; 53 + lehpm 2 - 461 & j06591011 - 4747002 & m6.5 & m7 & m7.4 & 13.64 & 0.92 & 2006 dec 20 & 120 & 32 ; 87 , 75 + lehpm 2 - 436 & j07075333 - 4900574 & m8.5 & m8 & m8.8 & 13.23 & 1.12 & 2006 dec 20 & 120 & 32 ; 75 + & & & & & & & 2006 dec 21 & 120 & 32 ; 37 , 75 + 2massw j0708213 + 295035 & j07082132 + 29503500 & l5 & & l5.4 : & 16.72 & 1.95 & 2013 dec 12 & 120 & 13 ; 13 + denis - p j0716478 - 063037 & j07164790 - 06303696 & l1+/-1 & & l1.1 & 13.90 & 1.33 & 2010 jan 02 & 120 & 53 ; 53 + & & & & & & & 2011 apr 04 & 120 & 53 ; 53 + 2mass j07200325 - 0846499 & j07200325 - 0846499 & m9 : & & m9.8 & 10.63 & 1.16 & 2013 dec 05 & 120 & 70 ; 70 + 2mass j07231462 + 5727081 & j07231462 + 5727081 & l1 & & l0.2 & 13.97 & 1.36 & 2008 jan 08 & 120 & 49 ; 49 + sdss j07342570 + 30065792 & j07342571 + 3006583 & m8 & & m7.6 & 15.13 & 1.05 & 2009 jan 25 & 120 & 48 ; 48 + sdss j07351959 + 4108503 & j07351959 + 4108503 & l0 & & m8.9 & 15.78 & 0.93 & 2010 jan 26 & 120 & 60 ; 60 + & & & & & & & 2011 mar 09 & 120 & 60 ; 60 + 2massw j0740096 + 321203 & j07400965 + 32120320 & l4.5 & & l4.0 & 16.19 & 1.97 & 2010 jan 26 & 120 & 61 ; 61 + & & & & & & & 2012 dec 27 & 120 & 13 ; 13 + sdss j074756.31 + 394732.9 & j07475631 + 3947329 & l0 & & m8.3 & 15.08 & 1.35 & 2008 jan 11 & 120 & 20 ; 20 + sdss j074838.61 + 174332.9 & j07483861 + 1743329 & l7 & & l6.0 & 16.27 & 1.85 & 2013 oct 29 & 120 & 54 ; 54 + denis - p j0751164 - 253043 & j07511645 - 2530432 & l2.5 & & l1.1 & 13.16 & 1.17 & 2009 nov 04 & 120 & 53 ; 53 + 2massi j0753321 + 291711 & j07533216 + 29171190 & l2 & & l2.0 & 15.52 & 1.67 & 2010 jan 28 & 120 & 13 ; 13 + & & & & & & & 2011 apr 03 & 120 & 13 ; 13 + 2mass j07575274 + 0914103 & j07575274 + 0914103 & l4 : : & & l3.7 : & 15.86 & 1.77 & 2013 apr 26 & 120 & 54 ; 54 + sdss j080048.13 + 465825.5 & j08004815 + 46582560 & l2 & & l1.3 & 15.51 & 1.20 & 2011 mar 09 & 75 & 20 ; 20 + 2mass j08041429 + 0330474 & j08041429 + 0330474 & m8.5 & & m9.7 & 13.69 & 1.25 & 2013 oct 29 & 120 & 49 ; 49 + sdss j080959.01 + 443422.2 & j08095903 + 4434216 & & l6 & l6.3 : & 16.44 & 2.02 & 2008 jan 12 & 120 & 34 ; 40 + denis - p j0812316 - 244442 & j08123170 - 24444239 & l2.5+/-1 & & l0.9 & 13.82 & 1.43 & 2010 jan 03 & 120 & 53 ; 53 + & & & & & & & 2012 dec 27 & 120 & 53 ; 53 + sdss j08175749 + 1824050 & j08175749 + 1824050 & l1 & & l2.0 & 15.09 & 1.27 & 2013 apr 26 & 120 & 60 ; 60 + sdss j08181228 + 3310482 & j08181228 + 3310482 & l0 & & l1.3 & 15.99 & 0.93 & 2011 apr 03 & 120 & 60 ; 60 + sdss j081946.02 + 165853.9 & j08194602 + 1658539 & m9 & & m8.6 & 13.79 & 1.17 & 2013 dec 05 & 120 & 74 ; 74 + denis j0823031 - 491201 & j08230313 - 4912012 & l1.5 & l3 & l2.7 & 13.55 & 1.48 & 2013 nov 24 & 120 & 53 ; 53 , 68 + 2mass j08230838 + 6125208 & j08230837 + 61252079 & l2 : & & l2.5 & 14.82 & 1.62 & 2011 apr 03 & 120 & 49 ; 49 + sdss j08264265 + 19392195 & j08264262 + 1939224 & l0 & & m9.2 & 14.78 & 1.20 & 2010 jan 25 & 120 & 48 ; 48 + 2massw j0829066 + 145622 & j08290664 + 1456225 & l2 & & l1.0 & 14.75 & 1.58 & 2008 jan 08 & 120 & 13 ; 13 + gj 1111 & j08294949 + 2646348 & m6.5 & & m7.2 & 8.230 & 0.97 & 2013 dec 12 & 120 & 2 ; 58 + 2massw j0829570 + 265510 & j08295706 + 26550990 & l6.5 & & l6.4 : : & 17.11 & 2.15 & 2013 dec 12 & 120 & 13 ; 13 + 2mass j08303256 + 0947150 & j08303256 + 0947150 & m8 & & m7.8 & 11.89 & 1.13 & 2012 dec 27 & 120 & ; + 2mass j08315564 + 1025466 & j08315564 + 1025466 & m9 & & m8.6 & 13.62 & 1.17 & 2009 mar 21 & 120 & ; 49 + 2massw j0832045 - 012835 & j08320451 - 0128360 & l1.5 & & l1.2 & 14.13 & 1.42 & 2008 jan 10 & 120 & 13 ; 13 + 2mass j08352366 + 1029318 & j08352366 + 1029318 & m7 & & m7.9 & 13.14 & 1.09 & 2013 dec 05 & 120 & 49 ; 49 + sdss j08354533 + 2224308 & j08354537 + 2224310 & l0 & & m8.7 & 15.74 & 1.29 & 2010 jan 25 & 120 & 60 ; 60 + 2mass j08355829 + 0548308 & j08355829 + 05483080 & l3 & & l1.7 & 14.53 & 1.36 & 2010 jan 24 & 120 & 49 ; 55 + & & & & & & & 2011 apr 04 & 120 & 49 ; 55 + sdss j08362199 + 4949315 & j08362199 + 4949315 & l0 & & m9.3 : & 15.42 & 0.88 & 2011 mar 09 & 120 & 60 ; 60 + sdss j08364634 + 0526426 & j08364635 + 0526426 & l0 & & m9.4 & 14.58 & 1.29 & 2008 sep 23 & 120 & 60 ; 60 + 2mass j08391608 + 1253543 & j08391608 + 1253543 & m9 & & m8.8 & 13.75 & 1.16 & 2013 dec 12 & 120 & 74 ; 74 + lhs 2034 & j08402975 + 1824091 & m6 & & m7.0 & 11.05 & 1.01 & 2013 dec 12 & 120 & 1 ; 57 + sdss j08410685 + 6035063 & j08410685 + 6035063 & l4 & & l1.5 & 15.94 & 1.25 & 2011 apr 03 & 120 & 60 ; 60 + sdss j08430794 + 3141292 & j08430794 + 3141292 & l3 & & l2.5 & 15.99 & 1.34 & 2011 apr 03 & 120 & 60 ; 60 + sdss j08433328 + 1024435 & j08433328 + 1024435 & l1 & & l2.7 : & 14.87 & 1.20 & 2013 dec 12 & 120 & 60 ; 60 + sdss j084403.46 + 043436.19 & j08440346 + 04343619 & m8 & & m8.7 & 13.46 & 1.05 & 2013 dec 12 & 120 & 48 ; 48 + sdss j08475148 + 0138110 & j08475148 + 0138110 & l3 & & l3.2 & 16.23 & 1.82 & 2013 dec 05 & 120 & 60 ; 60 + 2mass j08490052 + 0220155 & j08490052 + 0220155 & m8 & & m7.3 & 12.93 & 1.03 & 2013 dec 05 & 120 & 74 ; 74 + 2mass j08533434 - 0329432 & j08533434 - 0329432 & m9e & & m8.6 & 15.04 & 0.52 & 2009 mar 21 & 120 & ; + sdss j08583697 + 2710508 & j08583697 + 2710508 & l0 & & l0.0 & 15.05 & 1.39 & 2011 mar 09 & 120 & 60 ; 60 + 2massi j0859254 - 194926 & j08592522 - 1949279 & l6 : : & l8 & l6.8 & 15.53 & 1.78 & 2008 jan 12 & 120 & 27 ; 27 , 69 + 2mass j08593854 + 6341355 & j08593854 + 6341355 & l0 & & m8.6 & 13.70 & 1.31 & 2008 jan 11 & 120 & 49 ; 49 + 2mass j08594029 + 1145325 & j08594029 + 1145325 & m8 & & m8.4 & 12.74 & 1.25 & 2012 dec 27 & 120 & ; + lhs 2090 & j09002359 + 2150054 & m6.5 & & m7.3 & 9.440 & 1.00 & 2013 dec 12 & 120 & 17 ; 58 + sdss j09002368 + 2539343 & j09002368 + 2539343 & l7 & & l6.7 & 16.43 & 1.77 & 2013 dec 12 & 120 & 60 ; 60 + sdss j090206.90 + 003319.36 & j09020690 + 00331936 & m7 & & m7.3 & 12.11 & 0.95 & 2013 dec 05 & 120 & 48 ; 48 + sdss j09094813 + 1940439 & j09094813 + 1940439 & l1 & & m9.9 & 14.73 & 1.29 & 2013 apr 26 & 120 & 60 ; 60 + denis - p j0909 - 0658 & j09095749 - 0658186 & l0 & & l0.2 & 13.89 & 1.35 & 2008 jan 10 & 120 & 9 ; 52 + 2mass j09161504 + 2139512 & j09161504 + 2139512 & m9 & & m9.8 & 13.22 & 1.15 & 2013 dec 12 & 120 & 74 ; 74 + 2massw j0918382 + 213406 & j09183814 + 21340580 & l2.5 & & l2.7 & 15.66 & 1.76 & 2011 apr 03 & 120 & 11 ; 11 + sdss j09230870 + 2340137 & j09230870 + 2340137 & l1 & & l2.3 & 13.85 & 1.04 & 2011 mar 09 & 120 & 60 ; 60 + 2massw j0928397 - 160312 & j09283972 - 1603128 & l2 & & l1.7 & 15.32 & 1.71 & 2008 jan 12 & 120 & 13 ; 13 + sdss j09311323 + 2802271 & j09311323 + 2802271 & l3 & & l2.5 : & 14.98 & 1.25 & 2011 mar 09 & 120 & 60 ; 60 + sdss j093128.22 + 052821.93 & j09312822 + 05282193 & m7 & & m8.4 & 12.86 & 1.06 & 2013 dec 05 & 120 & 48 ; 48 + sdss j09323747 + 6725145 & j09323747 + 6725145 & l0 & & m9.4 & 15.91 & 0.92 & 2011 apr 03 & 120 & 60 ; 60 + 2mass j09340617 + 0536234 & j09340617 + 0536234 & m8 pec & & m7.5 & 15.57 & 0.81 & 2004 mar 11 & 120 & 45 ; 45 , 75 + 2mass j09352803 - 2934596 & j09352802 - 29345959 & l0 & & l0.3 & 14.04 & 1.21 & 2012 dec 27 & 120 & 49 ; 49 + sdss j09385888 + 0443439 & j09385888 + 0443439 & l0 & & m7.8 & 15.24 & 1.24 & 2013 apr 26 & 120 & 60 ; 60 + sdss j09404788 + 2946530 & j09404788 + 2946530 & l1 & & l0.4 & 15.29 & 1.37 & 2013 apr 26 & 120 & 60 ; 60 + sdss j09413492 + 1009421 & j09413492 + 1009421 & l0 & & m8.7 & 14.58 & 1.21 & 2013 apr 26 & 120 & 60 ; 60 + 2massw j0944027 + 313132 & j09440279 + 3131328 & l2 & & l1.7 & 15.50 & 1.49 & 2008 jan 09 & 120 & 13 ; 13 + 2mass 09474477 + 0224327 & j09474477 + 0224327 & m8 : & & m8.2 & 13.17 & 1.09 & 2013 dec 05 & 120 & 49 ; 49 + lhs 2195 & j09492223 + 0806450 & m8.5 & & m8.5 & 12.31 & 1.10 & 2013 dec 12 & 120 & 49 ; 49 + 2mass j09524622 + 0620410 & j09524622 + 0620410 & m8 & & m7.3 & 12.45 & 0.99 & 2013 dec 12 & 120 & 74 ; 74 + 2mass j09532126 - 1014205 & j09532126 - 1014205 & l0 & & m9.4 & 13.47 & 1.33 & 2008 jan 12 & 120 & 44 ; 44 + 2mass j09532126 - 1014205 & j09532126 - 10142056 & l0 & & l0.0 & 13.47 & 1.33 & 2006 dec 20 & 120 & 44 ; 44 + nltt 22851b & j09532455 + 0526583 & m9.5 & & m9.8 & 15.67 & 1.28 & 2013 dec 05 & 120 & 62 ; 62 + sdss j100319.17 - 010508.15 & j10031917 - 01050815 & m7 & & m8.0 & 12.33 & 1.09 & 2013 dec 12 & 120 & 48 ; 48 + g 196 - 3b & j10042066 + 5022596 & l3beta & & l5.6 : : & 14.83 & 2.05 & 2006 dec 23 & 120 & 7 ; 56 + lhs 5166b & j10043929 - 33351889 & l4 & & l4.5 : & 14.48 & 1.56 & 2013 apr 26 & 120 & 22 ; 22 + lhs 2243 & j10163470 + 2751497 & m8 v & & m7.4 & 11.99 & 1.03 & 2013 dec 12 & 120 & 5 ; 5 + 2massi j1017075 + 130839 & j10170754 + 1308398 & l2 : & l1 & l1.1 & 14.10 & 1.39 & 2008 jan 12 & 120 & 27 ; 27 , 30 + sdss j10174251 + 4310579 & j10174251 + 4310579 & l1 & & l0.9 & 15.55 & 1.03 & 2011 mar 09 & 120 & 60 ; 60 + 2massw j1018588 - 290953 & j10185879 - 29095349 & l1 & & l0.3 & 14.21 & 1.42 & 2012 dec 27 & 120 & 22 ; 22 + denis j1019245 - 270717 & j10192447 - 2707171 & l0.5 & & m9.1 & 13.53 & 1.06 & 2013 dec 12 & 120 & 59 ; 59 + 2mass 10213232 - 2044069 & j10213232 - 2044069 & m9 & & m8.5 & 13.19 & 1.13 & 2013 dec 12 & 120 & 49 ; 49 + 2mass j10220489 + 0200477 & j10220489 + 0200477 & l0 & & m9.0 & 14.10 & 1.20 & 2008 jan 10 & 120 & 49 ; 49 + 2mass j10224821 + 5825453 & j10224821 + 5825453 & l1beta & & l0.6 & 13.50 & 1.34 & 2008 jan 11 & 120 & 49 ; 49 + sdss j102552.43 + 321234.0 & j10255227 + 3212349 & & l7.5+/-2.5 & l5.8 : & 15.91 & 0.84 & 2008 jan 08 & 120 & 40 ; 40 + 2massi j1029216 + 162652 & j10292165 + 1626526 & l2.5 & & l2.8 & 14.29 & 1.67 & 2008 jan 12 & 120 & 13 ; 13 + sdss j10330910 + 1216259 & j10330910 + 1216259 & l0 & & m8.9 & 15.07 & 1.12 & 2013 apr 26 & 120 & 60 ; 60 + sdss j10340567 + 0350163 & j10340567 + 0350163 & l0 & & m8.7 & 14.70 & 1.07 & 2013 apr 26 & 120 & 60 ; 60 + 2massw j1035245 + 250745 & j10352455 + 2507450 & l1 & & l1.1 & 14.76 & 1.47 & 2008 jan 08 & 120 & 13 ; 13 + denis j104617.0 - 421237 & j10461703 - 4212372 & & m8 & m8.2 & 14.29 & 1.01 & 2008 jan 24 & 120 & ; 84 + lp 213 - 68 & j10471381 + 4026493 & m8 & & m8.2 & 12.44 & 1.18 & 2013 dec 12 & 120 & 16 ; 16 + denis - p j1047 - 1815 & j10473108 - 18155739 & l2.5 & & l0.3 & 14.20 & 1.31 & 2012 dec 27 & 120 & 10 ; 10 + sdss j104922.45 + 012559.2 & j10492244 + 01255930 & l5 & & l3.5 : & 15.88 & 1.77 & 2011 apr 04 & 120 & 54 ; 54 + 2mass j10511900 + 5613086 & j10511900 + 56130860 & l2 & & l0.8 & 13.24 & 1.34 & 2012 may 30 & 75 & 49 ; 49 + sdss j10515124 + 13111633 & j10515124 + 13111633 & l0 & & m9.5 : & 14.83 & 1.20 & 2013 apr 26 & 120 & 48 ; 48 + sdss j105547.29 + 080842.64 & j10554729 + 08084264 & m9 & & m8.5 & 12.55 & 1.18 & 2013 dec 12 & 120 & 48 ; 48 + 2massi j1059513 - 211308 & j10595138 - 21130819 & l1 & & l2.8 : & 14.56 & 1.35 & 2012 dec 27 & 120 & 27 ; 27 + lhs 2351 & j11061897 + 0428327 & m7 & & m7.6 & 12.33 & 1.00 & 2013 dec 12 & 120 & 4 ; 39 + 2mass j11073750 - 2759385b & j11073750 - 2759385 & & m7 & m7.0 & & & 2009 dec 29 & 120 & ; 84 + gliese 417bc & j11122567 + 35481310 & l4.5 & & l4.8 & 14.58 & 1.86 & 2007 mar 16 & 120 & 13 ; 13 + lhs 2397a & j11214909 - 1313082 & m8 & & m8.5 & & & 2011 mar 09 & 120 & ; + 2massw j1122362 - 391605 & j11223623 - 39160540 & l3 & & l3.7 : : & 15.71 & 1.83 & 2012 dec 27 & 120 & 22 ; 22 + sdss j11264703 + 5816322 & j11264703 + 5816322 & l3 & & l1.3 & 15.84 & 1.30 & 2011 apr 03 & 120 & 60 ; 60 + lehpm 2 - 333 & j11414421 - 2232204 & & m8 & m8.8 & 12.63 & 1.06 & 2006 apr 09 & 120 & 32 ; 75 + sdss j11491231 - 0153006 & j11491231 - 0153006 & l1 & & m8.5 & 14.67 & 0.96 & 2011 mar 09 & 120 & 60 ; 60 + 2mass j11533966 + 5032092 & j11533966 + 5032092 & l1 : & & l0.3 & 14.19 & 1.34 & 2008 jan 11 & 120 & 49 ; 49 + gj 3693 & j11535267 + 0659561 & m8 & & m7.0 & 11.26 & 0.99 & 2013 dec 12 & 120 & 4 ; 63 + 2mass j11544223 - 3400390 & j11544223 - 3400390 & l0 & & l0.5 & 14.20 & 1.34 & 2008 jan 09 & 120 & 38 ; 52 + 2massw j1155395 - 372735 & j11553951 - 37273499 & l2 & & l2.3 & 12.81 & 1.35 & 2012 dec 27 & 120 & 22 ; 22 + lp 851 - 346 & j11554286 - 2224586 & m7.5 & & m7.7 & 10.93 & 1.05 & 2013 dec 12 & 120 & 24 ; 24 + denis - p j1157480 - 484442 & j11574809 - 48444283 & l0.5+/-1 & & m9.4 & 14.01 & 1.21 & 2008 jan 24 & 120 & 53 ; 53 + denis - p j1159 + 0057 & j11593850 + 00572679 & l0 & & l0.4 & 14.08 & 1.27 & 2013 apr 25 & 120 & 10 ; 20 + sdss j11594072 + 5409386 & j11594072 + 5409386 & l2 & & l0.9 & 15.22 & 1.46 & 2013 apr 24 & 120 & 60 ; 60 + sdssp j120358.19 + 001550.3 & j12035811 + 00155000 & l3 & & l5.0 & 14.01 & 1.53 & 2011 apr 04 & 120 & 12 ; 12 + 2massi j1204303 + 321259 & j12043036 + 32125950 & l0 & m9 & m9.6 & 13.82 & 1.30 & 2013 apr 24 & 120 & 27 ; 27 , 30 + sdss j12061049 + 6242572 & j12061049 + 6242572 & l1 & & l2.1 & 15.65 & 1.70 & 2011 mar 09 & 120 & 60 ; 60 + denis j1206501 - 393725 & j12065011 - 3937261 & l2 & & l1.9 & 14.32 & 1.22 & 2007 mar 17 & 120 & 59 ; 59 + 2mass j12073804 - 3909050 & j12073803 - 39090500 & l2 : & & l0.9 & 14.69 & 1.44 & 2011 mar 11 & 120 & 49 ; 49 + 2massi j1213033 - 043243 & j12130335 - 04324369 & l5 & & l4.2 & 14.68 & 1.67 & 2011 apr 04 & 120 & 27 ; 27 + bri 1222 - 1222 & j12245222 - 1238352 & m9 & & m8.5 & 12.57 & 1.22 & 2006 jun 01 & 120 & 89 ; + 2mass j12312141 + 4959234 & j12312141 + 49592339 & l2 & & l3.4 & 14.62 & 1.48 & 2013 apr 24 & 120 & 44 ; 44 + 2mass j12321827 - 0951502 & j12321827 - 0951502 & l0 & & m9.5 & 13.73 & 1.17 & 2008 jan 14 & 120 & 49 ; 49 + sdss j12455566 + 4902109 & j12455566 + 4902109 & l1 & & m7.8 : & 15.95 & 0.75 & 2011 mar 09 & 120 & 60 ; 60 + 2massw j1246467 + 402715 & j12464677 + 40271500 & l4 & & l4.0 & 15.09 & 1.81 & 2011 apr 03 & 120 & 13 ; 13 + sdss j125128.43 + 624310.7 & j12512843 + 6243107 & l4 & & l4.2 & 15.49 & 1.13 & 2013 apr 24 & 120 & 54 ; 54 + 2mass j12565688 + 0146163 & j12565688 + 0146163 & l2 : & & l1.6 & 14.48 & 1.69 & 2009 jun 30 & 120 & 49 ; 49 + sdssp j125737.26 - 011336.1 & j12573726 - 0113360 & l4 & l5 & l5.8 & 15.94 & 1.82 & 2009 jun 30 & 120 & 21 ; 20 , 34 + 2massw j1300425 + 191235 & j13004255 + 1912354 & l1 & l3 & l1.7 & 12.72 & 1.09 & 2006 apr 10 & 120 & 14 ; 14 , 50 + 2mass j13015465 - 1510223 & j13015464 - 15102229 & l1 & & l0.5 & 14.54 & 1.44 & 2013 apr 26 & 120 & 49 ; 49 + gj 499c & j13054106 + 2046394 & l4 : & & l6.5 & 15.20 & 1.83 & 2009 jun 30 & 120 & 27 ; 27 + 2mass j13061727 + 3820296 & j13061726 + 38202960 & l0 & & l0.6 & 14.63 & 1.41 & 2011 apr 03 & 120 & 49 ; 49 + sdss j131142.1 + 362923.9 & j13114192 + 3629247 & l6 & l5 pec ( blue ) & l6.8 & 15.55 & 1.40 & 2012 jul 09 & 120 & 54 ; 54 , 66 + 2mass j13120700 + 3937440 & j13120700 + 3937440 & l0 : & & m8.8 & 14.14 & 1.25 & 2012 may 30 & 75 & ; + 2massi j1315309 - 264951 & j13153094 - 2649513 & l5.5 & & l6.7 & 15.20 & 1.73 & 2009 jun 30 & 120 & 79 ; 52 + 2mass j13204427 + 0409045 & j13204427 + 04090450 & l3 : : & & l2.5 & 15.25 & 1.63 & 2013 apr 24 & 120 & 49 ; 49 + denis - p j1323 - 1806 & j13233597 - 18063790 & l0 & & l0.0 & 14.90 & 1.24 & 2013 apr 26 & 120 & 10 ; 10 + 2massw j1326201 - 272937 & j13262009 - 2729370 & l5 & & l6.6 : & 15.85 & 1.99 & 2009 jun 30 & 120 & 22 ; 22 + sdss j13271521 + 0759375 & j13271521 + 0759375 & l1 & & l0.5 & 14.60 & 1.36 & 2013 apr 25 & 120 & 60 ; 60 + 2massw j1328550 + 211449 & j13285503 + 2114486 & l5 & & l4.1 & 16.19 & 1.93 & 2009 jun 30 & 120 & 11 ; 11 + sdss j133148.92 - 011651.4 & j13314893 - 01165000 & l6 & l8+/-2.5 & l6.1 & 15.46 & 1.39 & 2011 mar 09 & 120 & 20 ; 20 , 34 + sdss j13331279 + 1509566 & j13331279 + 1509566 & l0 & & m7.8 & 15.84 & 0.75 & 2011 mar 11 & 120 & 60 ; 60 + sdss j13334536 - 0216002 & j13334536 - 0216002 & l3 & & l2.2 & 15.38 & 1.53 & 2013 apr 25 & 120 & 60 ; 60 + 2mass j13364062 + 3743230 & j13364062 + 3743230 & l1 & & l0.4 & 14.41 & 1.31 & 2013 apr 26 & 120 & 44 ; 44 + 2mass j13373116 + 4938367 & j13373115 + 49383670 & l0 & & m8.9 & 13.77 & 1.19 & 2012 may 30 & 75 & 44 ; 44 + 2massw j1338261 + 414034 & j13382614 + 41403420 & l2.5 & & l2.4 & 14.22 & 1.45 & 2012 may 30 & 75 & 13 ; 13 + 2mass j13384944 + 0437315 & j13384944 + 04373150 & l1 & & l0.0 & 14.16 & 1.42 & 2012 may 30 & 75 & 49 ; 49 + 2mass j13411160 - 3052505 & j13411160 - 30525049 & l2 : : & & l2.7 : & 14.61 & 1.53 & 2012 jul 09 & 120 & 49 ; 49 + 2massw j1343167 + 394508 & j13431670 + 39450870 & l5 & & l5.3 : : & 16.16 & 2.01 & 2013 apr 24 & 120 & 13 ; 13 + sdss j13571490 - 1438520 & j13571490 - 1438520 & m7 & & m8.5 & 12.85 & 1.11 & 2012 may 30 & 75 & ; + 2mass j13595510 - 4034582 & j13595510 - 40345819 & l1 & & l3.1 : & 13.65 & 1.08 & 2013 apr 25 & 120 & 49 ; 49 + 2mass j14022235 + 0648479 & j14022235 + 0648479 & m9 & & m8.9 & 13.72 & 1.21 & 2010 jul 07 & 120 & ; + 2mass j14044495 + 4634297 & j14044495 + 4634297 & l0 : & & m9.7 & 14.34 & 1.28 & 2008 jul 13 & 120 & 44 ; 44 + sdss j14060148 + 5249309 & j14060148 + 5249309 & l0 & & m9.8 & 15.56 & 1.00 & 2011 mar 09 & 120 & ; 60 + 2mass j14090310 - 3357565 & j14090310 - 3357565 & l2 & & l1.3 & 14.25 & 1.38 & 2010 jul 07 & 120 & 52 ; 52 + 2massw j1411175 + 393636 & j14111735 + 3936363 & l1.5 & & l1.5 & 14.64 & 1.40 & 2008 jul 13 & 120 & 13 ; 13 + 2mass j14122270 + 2354100 & j14122270 + 2354100 & m9 & & m7.8 & 13.73 & 1.08 & 2009 jun 30 & 120 & ; + 2massw j1412244 + 163312 & j14122449 + 1633115 & l0.5 & & m9.9 & 13.89 & 1.37 & 2008 jul 30 & 120 & 13 ; 13 + sdss j14205830 + 2131566 & j14205830 + 2131566 & l1 & & l0.0 : & 15.12 & 1.06 & 2011 mar 11 & 120 & 60 ; 60 + 2massw 1421314 + 182740 & j14213145 + 1827407 & l0 & & m8.9 & 13.23 & 1.29 & 2008 jul 30 & 120 & 14 ; 49 + sdss j142227.25 + 221557.1 & j14222720 + 2215575 & & l6.5+/-2 & l5.4 : & 17.06 & 1.42 & 2009 jun 30 & 120 & 40 ; 40 + sdss j14225715 + 0827521 & j14225715 + 0827521 & l2 & & l2.1 & 15.10 & 1.45 & 2013 apr 25 & 120 & 60 ; 60 + 2mass j14232186 + 6154005 & j14232186 + 6154005 & & l4 & l4.5 & 16.60 & 1.32 & 2013 apr 26 & 120 & 65 ; 65 + gd 165b & j14243909 + 0917104 & l4 & l3+/-2 & l4.4 & 15.69 & 1.52 & 2009 jun 29 & 120 & 3 ; 11 , 34 + denis - p j142527.97 - 365023.4 & j14252798 - 3650229 & l3 : & l5 & l4.5 : : & 13.75 & 1.94 & 2010 jul 07 & 120 & 31 ; 49 , 31 + 2mass j14261286 + 3130394 & j14261286 + 3130394 & l4 & & l4.0 : : & 16.62 & 1.90 & 2013 apr 25 & 120 & 54 ; 54 + 2mass j14283132 + 5923354 & j14283132 + 59233546 & l4 & & l4.4 & 14.78 & 1.52 & 2012 jul 09 & 120 & 49 ; 49 + lhs 2924 & j14284313 + 3310368 & m9 v & & m9.1 & 11.99 & 1.25 & 2007 jul 04 & 120 & ; + 2massi j1430435 + 291540 & j14304358 + 2915405 & l2 & l0.5 & l1.5 & 14.27 & 1.50 & 2008 jul 13 & 120 & 30 ; 27 , 30 + sdss j14324210 + 3451427 & j14324210 + 3451427 & l1 & & l1.2 & 15.75 & 0.98 & 2011 apr 19 & 120 & 60 ; 60 + sdss j14380829 + 64083631 & j14380829 + 64083631 & l0 & & l0.2 & 12.98 & 1.33 & 2011 mar 11 & 120 & 48 ; 48 + sdss j143832.63 + 572216.9 & j14383259 + 5722168 & l5 & & l4.6 & 15.96 & 1.59 & 2010 jul 07 & 120 & 54 ; 54 + 2massw j1438549 - 130910 & j14385498 - 13091029 & l3 : & & l3.1 & 15.49 & 1.63 & 2012 jul 09 & 120 & 13 ; 13 + sdss j143933.44 + 031759.2 & j14393342 + 03175909 & l1 & & l0.7 & 15.99 & 1.18 & 2011 apr 19 & 120 & 20 ; 20 + sdss j14403025 + 12333391 & j14403025 + 12333391 & m9 & & m8.6 & 14.41 & 1.22 & 2013 mar 27 & 75 & 48 ; 48 + 2massi j1441045 + 271932 & j14410457 + 27193234 & m7 & & m7.0 & 12.99 & 1.02 & 2013 mar 27 & 75 & 44 ; 44 + g 124 - 62bc & j14413716 - 09455900 & l0.5 & & l0.4 & 14.02 & 1.36 & 2008 jul 14 & 120 & 10 ; 13 + & & & & & & & 2011 mar 09 & 120 & 10 ; 13 + g 239 - 25 b & j14422175 + 6603198 & & l0+/-1 & m8.1 & 11.51 & 1.18 & 2010 jul 07 & 120 & 35 ; 78 + ssspm 1444 - 2019 & j14442067 - 2019222 & d / sdm9 & d / sdm7 & m9.0 & 12.55 & 0.61 & 2005 mar 23 & 120 & 33 ; 45 , 75 + 2mass j14442946 + 0048530 & j14442946 + 0048530 & m9 & & m8.1 & 15.95 & 0.76 & 2009 jun 30 & 120 & ; + sdssp j144600.60 + 002452.0 & j14460060 + 00245190 & l6 & l5 & l4.2 & 15.89 & 1.96 & 2011 mar 11 & 120 & 21 ; 20 , 34 + 2massw j1449378 + 235537 & j14493784 + 2355378 & l0 & & m9.5 & 15.82 & 1.51 & 2008 jul 13 & 120 & 13 ; 13 + 2mass j14520183 + 1114590 & j14520183 + 1114590 & l2 & & l2.9 & 15.52 & 1.18 & 2013 apr 26 & 120 & 77 ; 62 + sdss j14525558 + 2723244 & j14525558 + 2723244 & l0 & & l0.2 : & 14.92 & 0.84 & 2011 mar 09 & 120 & 60 ; 60 + sdss j14532589 + 1420418 & j14532589 + 1420418 & l1 & & l4.1 : & 15.07 & 1.18 & 2013 apr 26 & 120 & 60 ; 60 + lehpm 2 - 50 & j14560172 - 2747288 & & l1 & m9.3 & 13.25 & 1.06 & 2006 mar 12 & 120 & 32 ; 75 + lhs 3003 & j1456383 - 280947 & m7 & & m7.7 & 9.970 & 1.04 & 2008 jul 29 & 120 & ; + lehpm 2 - 498 & j14565736 - 2631265 & & m8 & m7.7 & 13.56 & 0.95 & 2006 mar 12 & 120 & 32 ; 75 + pss 1458 + 2839 & j1458245 + 283958 & m8.5 & & m8.5 & 13.08 & 1.23 & 2008 jul 13 & 120 & ; + 2mass j15004572 + 4219448 & j15004572 + 4219448 & m9 & & m8.4 & 13.77 & 1.13 & 2012 may 30 & 75 & ; + tvlm 513 - 46546 & j1501081 + 225002 & m8.5 & & m9.3 & 11.87 & 1.16 & 2008 jul 30 & 120 & ; + 2mass j15101685 - 024107 & j15101685 - 024107 & m9 & & m9.3 & 12.61 & 1.27 & 2009 jun 29 & 120 & ; + sdss j15102955 + 36194699 & j15102955 + 36194699 & m9 & & m8.3 & 14.00 & 1.18 & 2013 aug 14 & 120 & 48 ; 48 + 2mass j15111091 + 4340363 & j15111091 + 4340363 & l5 & & l5.8 & 16.60 & 1.90 & 2013 apr 25 & 120 & 54 ; 54 + sdss j15124067 + 3403501 & j15124067 + 3403501 & l3 & & l0.7 & 15.04 & 1.63 & 2013 apr 25 & 120 & 60 ; 60 + 2mass j15230657 - 2347526 & j15230657 - 2347526 & & l2.5 & l0.3 & 14.20 & 1.30 & 2008 jul 29 & 120 & 47 ; 82 + sdss j153453.33 + 121949.2 & j15345324 + 12194950 & & l4+/-1.5 & l5.5 & 15.33 & 1.51 & 2012 jul 09 & 120 & 40 ; 40 + 2mass j15345700 - 1418480 & j15345700 - 1418480 & m7 & & m8.6 & 11.39 & 1.08 & 2012 may 30 & 75 & ; + denis - p j153941.96 - 052042.4 & j15394189 - 0520428 & l4 : & l2 & l4.2 & 13.92 & 1.35 & 2008 jul 14 & 120 & 31 ; 52 , 31 + lehpm 2 - 287 & j15453990 - 2255167 & & m8 & m8.2 & 13.71 & 1.09 & 2006 apr 09 & 120 & 32 ; 75 + 2mass j15474719 - 2423493 & j15474719 - 2423493 & m9 & & m9.0 & 13.97 & 1.23 & 2008 jul 29 & 120 & 49 ; 49 + sdss j154849.02 + 172235.4 & j15484911 + 17223590 & & l5 & l6.6 & 16.10 & 1.65 & 2013 aug 14 & 120 & 40 ; 40 + 2mass j15485834 - 1636018 & j15485834 - 1636018 & & l2+/-1 & m8.8 & 13.89 & 1.26 & 2010 jul 07 & 120 & 47 ; 47 + sdss j15512086 + 4329303 & j15512086 + 4329303 & l3 & & l3.1 & 15.13 & 1.50 & 2011 apr 19 & 120 & 60 ; 60 + sdss j15525232 - 0035019 & j15525232 - 0035019 & l0 & & m9.6 : & 15.99 & 0.98 & 2011 apr 19 & 120 & 60 ; 60 + 2massw j1552591 + 294849 & j15525906 + 2948485 & l0beta & l1 & l0.5 : & 13.48 & 1.46 & 2008 jul 30 & 120 & 30 ; 56 , 30 + 2massw j1553214 + 210907 & j15532142 + 2109071 & l5.5 & & l6.6 : & 16.70 & 2.02 & 2009 jun 29 & 120 & 11 ; 11 + 2massw j1555157 - 095605 & j15551573 - 0956055 & l1 & & l1.6 & 12.56 & 1.11 & 2008 jul 14 & 120 & 22 ; 22 + sdss j15564435 + 1723089 & j15564435 + 1723089 & l0 & & l0.7 & 14.67 & 1.32 & 2013 aug 14 & 120 & 60 ; 60 + 2mass j15573270 + 1752380 & j15573270 + 1752380 & m7.5 & & m8.3 & 13.54 & 1.09 & 2013 aug 14 & 120 & 44 ; 44 + 2massi j1600054 + 170832 & j16000548 + 1708328 & l1.5 & & l1.8 & 16.05 & 1.37 & 2008 jul 12 & 120 & 13 ; 13 + 2mass j16082460 + 195747 & j16082460 + 195747 & m9 & & m8.6 & 13.52 & 1.17 & 2009 jun 29 & 120 & ; + lsr 1610 - 0040 & j16102900 - 0040530 & sdl : & d / sdm6 & m7.0 : & 12.91 & 0.89 & 2004 mar 12 & 120 & 26 ; 26 , 42 + 2mass j16134550 + 1708270 & j16134550 + 1708270 & m9.5 & & m9.6 & 13.47 & 1.28 & 2009 jun 29 & 120 & ; + 2massw j1615441 + 355900 & j16154416 + 3559005 & l3 & & l3.6 & 14.54 & 1.60 & 2009 jun 30 & 120 & 13 ; 13 + 2mass j16184503 - 1321297 & j16184503 - 1321297 & l0 : & & m9.3 & 14.25 & 1.33 & 2010 jul 07 & 120 & 52 ; 52 + sdss j161928.31 + 005011.9 & j16192830 + 0050118 & l2 & & l1.3 & 14.39 & 1.20 & 2008 jul 30 & 120 & 20 ; 20 + lehpm 2 - 1973 & j16202207 - 2446025 & & m7 & m7.0 & 14.32 & 0.94 & 2006 apr 09 & 120 & 32 ; 75 + gj 618.1b & j16202614 - 0416315 & l2.5 & & l2.4 & 15.28 & 1.69 & 2008 jul 30 & 120 & 18 ; 18 + 2mass j16203450 - 2430200 & j16203456 - 2430205 & m6.5 & & m9.4 : : & 14.20 & 1.66 & 2008 jul 29 & 120 & ; + 2mass j16210822 + 2938480 & j16210822 + 2938480 & m9 & & m9.4 & 15.17 & 0.84 & 2009 jun 30 & 120 & ; + sdss j16260303 + 2113130 & j16260303 + 2113130 & l3 & & l4.7 : & 15.48 & 1.56 & 2013 apr 24 & 120 & 60 ; 60 + 2mass j16301770 - 2120010 & j16301770 - 2120010 & & m9 : & m9.4 & 14.51 & 1.32 & 2008 jul 29 & 120 & 77 ; + & & & & & & & 2008 aug 28 & 120 & 77 ; + 2mass j16304139 + 0938446 & j16304138 + 09384459 & l0 : : & & l0.4 : & 14.87 & 1.57 & 2011 apr 19 & 120 & 49 ; 49 + sdss j16311227 + 32271141 & j16311227 + 32271141 & m7 & & m8.2 & 13.15 & 0.91 & 2013 apr 26 & 120 & 48 ; 48 + sdss j163256.1 + 350507.3 & j1632561 + 3505073 & l1 & & l0.7 & 14.65 & 1.35 & 2012 jul 09 & 120 & 74 ; 74 + sdss j16351918 + 42230531 & j16351918 + 42230531 & m8 & & m8.6 & 12.88 & 1.09 & 2013 apr 26 & 120 & 48 ; 48 + sdssp j163600.79 - 003452.6 & j16360078 - 0034525 & l0 & & m9.0 & 14.59 & 1.18 & 2008 jul 30 & 120 & 12 ; 12 + 2mass j16452207 + 3004071 & j16452207 + 3004071 & l3 & & l2.3 & 15.19 & 1.60 & 2008 jul 13 & 120 & 44 ; 44 + 2mass j16452207 + 3004071 & j16452207 + 30040718 & l3 & & l3.0 & 15.19 & 1.60 & 2012 jul 09 & 120 & 44 ; 44 + 2mass j16490419 + 0444571 & j16490419 + 0444571 & m8 & & m8.1 & 12.96 & 1.08 & 2013 aug 14 & 120 & 49 ; 49 + sdss j16545079 + 3747146 & j16545079 + 3747146 & l2 & & l0.7 & 15.01 & 1.35 & 2013 apr 26 & 120 & 60 ; 60 + vb 8 & j16553529 - 0823401 & m7 v & & m7.0 & 9.780 & 0.96 & 2007 jul 04 & 120 & ; + 2mass j16573454 + 1054233 & j16573454 + 1054233 & l2 & & l1.4 & 14.15 & 1.35 & 2009 jun 29 & 120 & 49 ; 49 + wise j165842.56 + 510335.0 & j16584256 + 5103350 & & l6pec & l5.5 : & 15.06 & 1.40 & 2013 oct 23 & 120 & 69 ; 69 + sdss j16585026 + 1820006 & j16585026 + 1820006 & l0 & & l0.9 & 15.48 & 0.91 & 2010 jul 07 & 120 & ; + sdss j17031670 + 19063603 & j17031670 + 19063603 & l0 & & m8.9 & 14.92 & 1.27 & 2012 jul 09 & 120 & 48 ; 48 + 2mass j17072343 - 0558249b & j17072343 - 05582489 & & l3 & l0.0 & 12.26 & 1.23 & 2006 aug 28 & 120 & 41 ; 41 + denis j1707252 - 013809 & j17072529 - 0138093 & l0.5 & l2 & l1.0 & 14.29 & 1.22 & 2006 aug 28 & 120 & 59 ; 59 , 64 + 2massi j1707333 + 430130 & j17073334 + 4301304 & l0.5 & & m8.7 & 13.97 & 1.35 & 2008 sep 08 & 120 & 27 ; 27 + sdss j17104934 + 33232518 & j17104934 + 33232518 & l0 & & m9.4 & 15.13 & 1.05 & 2011 apr 19 & 120 & 48 ; 48 + 2mass j17111353 + 2326333 & j17111353 + 2326333 & l0 : & & l0.5 : & 14.50 & 1.44 & 2008 jul 13 & 120 & 44 ; 44 + g 203 - 50 b & j17114530 + 4029021 & & l5 + 2 - 1.5 & l5.0 & 15.00 & 1.20 & 2008 sep 09 & 120 & 86 ; 86 + & & & & & & & 2010 jul 07 & 120 & 86 ; 86 + 2mass j10511900 + 5613086 & j17170450 + 1509530 & m7 & & m7.9 & 13.61 & 1.11 & 2012 may 30 & 75 & ; + sdss j171714.10 + 652622.2 & j17171408 + 6526221 & l4 & & l6.2 & 14.95 & 1.77 & 2009 jun 30 & 120 & 20 ; 20 + sdss j17175402 + 64274503 & j17175402 + 64274503 & m8 & & m8.8 & 14.41 & 1.03 & 2013 oct 22 & 120 & 48 ; 48 + 2massi j1721039 + 334415 & j17210390 + 3344160 & l3 & l5+/-1 & l5.3 : & 13.63 & 1.14 & 2008 sep 08 & 120 & 27 ; 27 , 50 + sdss j172244.32 + 632946.8 & j17224432 + 6329470 & l0 & & l0.7 & 15.37 & 1.29 & 2009 jun 30 & 120 & 20 ; 20 + sdss j17254384 + 5325349 & j17254384 + 5325349 & l1 & & m8.0 & 15.16 & 0.95 & 2010 jul 07 & 120 & ; + 2massi j1726000 + 153819 & j17260007 + 1538190 & l3beta & & l3.6 : : & 15.67 & 2.01 & 2008 may 11 & 120 & 13 ; 56 + & & & & & & & 2008 jul 13 & 120 & 13 ; 56 + 2mass j17281134 + 0839590 & j17281134 + 0839590 & m9 pec & & m9.8 & 13.63 & 1.13 & 2009 jun 29 & 120 & ; + denis - p j1733423 - 165449 & j17334227 - 1654500 & l0.5+/-1 & & l0.9 & 13.53 & 1.18 & 2006 apr 11 & 120 & 53 ; 53 + 2massw j1743415 + 212707 & j17434148 + 2127069 & l2.5 & & l2.4 & 15.83 & 1.51 & 2009 jun 30 & 120 & 13 ; 13 + denis - p j1745346 - 164053 & j17453466 - 1640538 & l1.5+/-1 & & l1.3 & 13.65 & 1.24 & 2008 sep 08 & 120 & 53 ; 53 + 2mass j17461199 + 5034036 & j17461199 + 50340362 & l5 & & l5.7 & 15.10 & 1.57 & 2012 jul 09 & 120 & 49 ; 49 + 2mass j18000116 - 1559235 & j18000116 - 1559235 & l5.5 & & l4.3 & 13.30 & & 2012 jul 09 & 120 & 68 ; 68 + 2mass j18064570 + 2923591 & j18064570 + 2923591 & m8 : & & m8.3 & 14.20 & 1.26 & 2010 jul 07 & 120 & ; + lsr 1826 + 3014 & j18261131 + 3014201 & m8.5 & d / sdm8.5 & m9.9 & 11.66 & 0.85 & 2004 sep 09 & 120 & 23 ; 23 , 75 + sdss j183929.17 + 442438 & j18392917 + 442438 & m9 & & m8.9 & 13.43 & 1.08 & 2008 nov 04 & 120 & 48 ; 48 + denis j19013910 - 3700170 & j19013910 - 3700170 & m8 & & l0.1 : : & 14.26 & 1.96 & 2013 apr 24 & 120 & 59 ; 59 + denis - p j1909081 - 193748 & j19090821 - 1937479 & l1+/-1 & & l1.4 & 14.52 & 1.61 & 2008 sep 08 & 120 & 53 ; 53 + vb 10 & j19165762 + 0509021 & m8 v & & m8.0 & 9.910 & 1.14 & 2007 jul 04 & 120 & 90 ; 73 + 2mass j19233810 - 3308410 & j19233810 - 3308410 & m7 & & m8.5 & 13.27 & 1.04 & 2012 sep 27 & 120 & ; + denis jj1934511 - 184134 & j1934511 - 184134 & m8.5 & & m8.5 & 14.28 & 1.15 & 2013 oct 23 & 120 & 59 ; 59 + lehpm 2 - 90 & j19453495 - 2557190 & & m9 & m8.9 & 12.35 & 0.84 & 2006 sep 02 & 120 & 32 ; 75 + 2mass j19561542 - 1754252 & j19561542 - 1754252 & m8 & l0+/-1 & m8.5 & 13.75 & 1.10 & 2007 sep 16 & 120 & 47 ; 49 , 82 + 2mass j20025073 - 0521524 & j200250732 - 05215242 & l6 & & l6.8 : : & 15.32 & 1.90 & 2007 jul 04 & 120 & 44 ; 44 + denis j2013108 - 124244 & j2013108 - 124244 & l1.5 & & l0.7 & 14.52 & 1.21 & 2013 oct 22 & 120 & 59 ; 59 + 2mass j20263647 + 0439400 & j20263647 + 0439400 & m9 : & & m8.5 & 14.16 & 1.23 & 2009 jun 28 & 120 & ; + 2mass j2035203 - 311008 & j2035203 - 311008 & m7 & & m7.9 & 13.19 & 1.03 & 2010 jul 07 & 120 & ; + 2mass j20414283 - 3506442 & j20414283 - 3506442 & l2 : & & l1.9 & 14.89 & 1.49 & 2008 sep 08 & 120 & 44 ; 44 + sdss j204724.7 + 142152 & j2047247 + 142152 & m7.5 & & m8.9 & 13.04 & 1.16 & 2008 nov 03 & 120 & 48 ; 48 + lehpm 2 - 381 & j20522811 - 4758362 & m8 & m8 & m8.1 & 12.94 & 1.06 & 2004 sep 06 & 120 & 32 ; 75 + 2massi j2054358 + 151904 & j20543585 + 1519043 & l1 : & & l0.3 & 16.37 & 1.39 & 2009 jun 28 & 120 & 13 ; 13 + 2massi j2057153 + 171515 & j20571538 + 1715154 & l1.5 & & m9.9 & 15.97 & 1.47 & 2009 jun 28 & 120 & 13 ; 13 + 2mass j20575592 - 0050060 & j20575592 - 0050060 & m9 & & m9.3 & 14.97 & 1.20 & 2009 jun 29 & 120 & ; + 2mass j21075409 - 4544064 & j21075409 - 45440639 & l0 : & & l2.6 & 14.92 & 1.53 & 2013 aug 14 & 120 & 49 ; 49 + hb 2115 - 4518 & j2118317 - 450552 & m8.5 & & m8.6 & 13.43 & 1.06 & 2008 jul 14 & 120 & ; + sdss j211846.77 - 001044.6 & j21184677 - 00104469 & l1 & & l2.2 : & 16.20 & 1.13 & 2012 sep 27 & 120 & 54 ; 54 + sdss j212033.89 + 102159 & j21203389 + 102159 & m8 & & m9.0 & 13.54 & 1.12 & 2008 nov 03 & 120 & 48 ; 48 + 2mass j21233110 - 2345180 & j21233110 - 2345180 & m7.5 & & m8.2 & 13.58 & 1.04 & 2013 jul 17 & 75 & 44 ; 44 + 2mass j21263403 - 3143220 & j21263403 - 3143220 & m9 & & m9.2 & 13.47 & 1.10 & 2009 jun 28 & 120 & ; + hb 2124 - 4228 & j2127261 - 421518 & m7.5 & & m8.9 & 13.32 & 1.14 & 2008 jul 14 & 120 & ; + hb 2126 - 4459 & j2130086 - 444627 & m8.5 & & m8.2 & 14.32 & 1.15 & 2008 jul 14 & 120 & ; + 2massw j2130446 - 084520 & j21304463 - 08452049 & l1.5 & & m8.3 & 14.14 & 1.32 & 2006 sep 01 & 120 & 52 ; 52 + & & & & & & & 2006 sep 02 & 120 & 52 ; 52 + & & & & & & & 2008 jul 13 & 120 & 52 ; 52 + & & & & & & & 2008 sep 09 & 120 & 52 ; 52 + & & & & & & & 2012 sep 27 & 120 & 52 ; 52 + & & & & & & & 2012 oct 27 & 120 & 52 ; 52 + sdss j213240.36 + 102949.4 & j21324035 + 10294940 & & l4.5+/-1 & l4.8 : : & 16.59 & 1.96 & 2012 oct 27 & 120 & 40 ; 40 + sdss j213307.94 + 232159 & j21330794 + 232159 & m9.5 & & m9.6 & 13.74 & 1.18 & 2008 nov 04 & 120 & 48 ; 48 + sdss j213435.61 + 240408 & j21343561 + 240408 & m8 & & m9.2 & 13.57 & 1.17 & 2008 nov 04 & 120 & 48 ; 48 + 2mass j21371044 + 1450475 & j21371044 + 1450475 & l2 & & l0.8 & 14.13 & 1.32 & 2008 sep 08 & 120 & 49 ; 49 + denis j21391360 - 3529500 & j21391360 - 3529500 & l0 & & l2.1 : & 14.47 & 1.11 & 2013 aug 14 & 120 & 59 ; 59 + sdss j214046.55 + 011259.7 & j21404654 + 0112594 & l3 & & l4.4 & 15.89 & 1.47 & 2008 sep 08 & 120 & 20 ; 20 + 2mass j21420580 - 3101162 & j21420580 - 3101162 & l3 & & l2.9 & 15.84 & 1.88 & 2010 jul 07 & 120 & 43 ; 43 + sdss j214527.82 - 073434.2 & j21452782 - 0734342 & m9 & & m8.7 & 15.59 & 1.28 & 2009 nov 04 & 120 & 48 ; 48 + 2mass j21472764 + 0101040 & j21472764 + 0101040 & m9 & & m9.1 & 14.57 & 1.10 & 2009 jun 28 & 120 & ; + 2mass j21481628 + 4003593 & j21481633 + 4003594 & l6 & l6.5pec & l4.0 & 14.15 & 2.38 & 2005 sep 09 & 120 & 51 ; 51 + 2mass j21483083 + 0020540 & j21483083 + 0020540 & m9 & & m8.5 & 15.46 & 1.15 & 2009 jun 28 & 120 & ; + sdss j214956.55 + 060334 & j21495655 + 060334 & m9 & & m8.1 & 13.34 & 1.17 & 2008 nov 03 & 120 & 48 ; 48 + sdss j215339.77 + 295005 & j21533977 + 295005 & m9 & & m8.8 & 13.94 & 1.17 & 2008 nov 03 & 120 & 48 ; 48 + 2mass j21580457 - 1550098 & j21580456 - 15500980 & l4 : & & l4.3 : & 15.04 & 1.85 & 2006 sep 01 & 120 & 52 ; 52 + 2mass j22044198 - 0036510 & j22044198 - 0036510 & m9 & & m8.5 & 15.73 & 1.24 & 2009 jun 29 & 120 & ; + 2massw j2206450 - 421721 & j22064498 - 4217208 & l2 & & l4.2 : : & 15.56 & 1.95 & 2008 jul 14 & 120 & 13 ; 13 + grh 2208 - 2007 & j2210499 - 195224 & m7.5 & & m8.8 & 14.00 & 0.85 & 2008 jul 14 & 120 & ; + 2mass j22114470 + 6856262 & j22114470 + 6856262 & & l2 & l2.2 & 15.67 & 1.65 & 2005 sep 08 & 120 & 61 ; 61 + 2mass j22134491 - 2136079 & j22134491 - 21360789 & l0gamma & & l1.9 : & 15.38 & 1.62 & 2006 sep 02 & 120 & 44 ; 56 + & & & & & & & 2008 aug 29 & 120 & 44 ; 56 + wise j222219.93 + 302601.4 & j22221993 + 3026014 & & l9 & l6.7 : & 16.55 & 1.37 & 2013 oct 23 & 120 & 69 ; 69 + lhs 523 & j22285440 - 1325178 & m6.5 & & m7.7 & 10.77 & 0.92 & 2007 sep 16 & 120 & ; + 2maspj2234330 + 291850 & j2234331 + 291849 & m8 : & & m7.9 & 14.04 & 1.08 & 2008 jul 12 & 120 & ; + 2mass j22355013 + 1227370 & j22355013 + 1227370 & m9 & & m9.2 & 15.21 & 1.17 & 2009 jun 30 & 120 & ; + 2massi j2238074 + 435317 & j22380742 + 4353179 & l1.5 & & l0.6 & 13.84 & 1.32 & 2009 nov 07 & 120 & 27 ; 27 + & & & & & & & 2010 jul 07 & 120 & 27 ; 27 + sdss j22434553 - 08215302 & j22434553 - 08215302 & m8 & & m8.4 & 15.43 & 1.14 & 2013 jul 17 & 75 & 48 ; 48 + sdss j225003.72 + 143046.7 & j22500372 + 1430467 & m9 & & m8.7 & 14.94 & 1.22 & 2009 nov 04 & 120 & 48 ; 48 + & & & & & & & 2009 nov 07 & 120 & 48 ; 48 + 2massi j2254519 - 284025 & j22545194 - 2840253 & l0.5 & l0.5 & l0.2 & 14.13 & 1.18 & 2008 jul 14 & 120 & 27 ; 27 , 31 + sdssp j225529.09 - 003433.4 & j22552907 - 0034336 & l0 : & & m8.6 & 15.65 & 1.21 & 2008 sep 07 & 120 & 19 ; 19 + ulas j22585405 + 0113512 & j22585405 + 0113512 & m9 & & m8.8 & 13.91 & 1.00 & 2013 aug 14 & 120 & 62 ; 62 + sdss j225913.88 - 005158.2 & j22591388 - 0051581 & l2 & & l1.6 & 16.36 & 1.71 & 2009 jun 29 & 120 & 20 ; 20 + sdss j230809.9 - 313122 & j2308099 - 313122 & m7 & & m7.5 & 13.62 & 1.04 & 2008 nov 04 & 120 & 48 ; 48 + denis j2308113 - 272200 & j2308113 - 272200 & l1.5 & & l1.4 & 14.58 & 1.40 & 2013 sep 03 & 120 & 59 ; 59 + ssspm j2310 - 1759 & j23101846 - 1759090 & l0 : & l1 & m9.9 & 14.38 & 1.41 & 2008 jul 14 & 120 & 83 ; 44 , 37 + sdss j23172515 - 00543358 & j23172515 - 00543358 & m9 & & m8.7 & 15.68 & 0.94 & 2012 sep 27 & 120 & 48 ; 48 + 2mass j2320292 + 412341 & j2320292 + 412341 & l1 : & & m9.8 & 14.59 & 1.39 & 2003 aug 12 & 75 & 76 ; + & & & & & & & 2008 sep 08 & 120 & ; + 2mass j23211254 - 1326282 & j23211254 - 1326282 & & l1 & l0.4 & 14.50 & 1.36 & 2003 sep 04 & 75 & 47 ; 47 + & & & & & & & 2008 jul 12 & 120 & 47 ; 47 + & & & & & & & 2008 sep 08 & 120 & 47 ; 47 + sdss j232136.11 - 002819.1 & j23213611 - 0028191 & m9 & & m8.3 & 15.48 & 1.04 & 2009 nov 04 & 120 & 48 ; 48 + sdss j232246.84 - 313323 & j23224684 - 313323 & l0 : & & l1.6 : & 13.58 & 1.25 & 2006 aug 28 & 120 & 48 ; 48 + & & & & & & & 2008 nov 04 & 120 & 48 ; 48 + sdss j232313.4 - 024435 & j2323134 - 024435 & m8.5 & & m8.0 & 13.58 & 1.10 & 2008 nov 03 & 120 & 48 ; 48 + 2mass j23302258 - 0347189 & j23302258 - 0347189 & l1 : & & l0.5 & 14.48 & 1.35 & 2008 jul 14 & 120 & 44 ; 44 + hd 221356bc & j23310217 - 0406248 & m9+l3 & & m8.7 & 12.94 & 0.98 & 2013 dec 05 & 120 & 14 ; 46 + lspm j2331 + 4607n & j23311807 + 4607310 & & d / sdm7 & m7.4 & 15.92 & 0.74 & 2005 sep 07 & 120 & ; 75 + 2mass j23312935 + 1552220 & j23312935 + 1552220 & l0 & & m9.5 & 15.06 & 1.06 & 2009 jun 30 & 120 & ; + sdss j233224.38 - 005025 & j23322438 - 005025 & m8 & & m7.7 & 13.65 & 1.04 & 2008 nov 03 & 120 & 48 ; 48 + sdss j233350.76 - 000011.3 & j23335076 - 0000113 & m9 & & m8.6 & 15.52 & 0.98 & 2009 nov 07 & 120 & 48 ; 48 + 2mass j23335838 + 0050110 & j23335838 + 0050110 & m9 & & m9.3 & 15.01 & 1.17 & 2009 jul 01 & 120 & ; + sdss j23352642 + 0817213 & j23352642 + 0817213 & l0 & & m9.5 & 14.72 & 1.34 & 2012 oct 24 & 120 & 60 ; 60 + sdss j23371664 - 09332480 & j23371664 - 09332480 & m8 & & m7.6 & 13.41 & 1.13 & 2013 aug 14 & 120 & 48 ; 48 + 2mass j2341286 - 113335 & j2341286 - 113335 & m8 & & m7.9 & 13.55 & 1.00 & 2010 jul 07 & 120 & ; + 2mass j23440624 - 0733282 & j23440624 - 0733282 & l4.5 & & l6.0 & 14.80 & 1.57 & 2009 jun 29 & 120 & 52 ; 52 + 2mass j23453903 + 0055137 & j23453903 + 0055137 & m9 & & m9.2 & 13.77 & 1.19 & 2008 jul 14 & 120 & 49 ; 49 + sdss j234654.7 - 315353 & j2346547 - 315353 & m8 & & m8.7 & 13.28 & 1.08 & 2008 nov 04 & 120 & 48 ; 48 + 2mass j2352050 - 110043 & j2352050 - 110043 & m7 & & m8.0 & 12.84 & 1.10 & 2010 jul 07 & 120 & ; + denis - p j2353 - 0833 & j2353594 - 083331 & m8.5 & & m8.6 & 13.03 & 1.10 & 2010 jul 07 & 120 & ; + denis j23545990 - 1852210 & j23545990 - 1852210 & l2 & & l2.6 : & 14.22 & 1.39 & 2013 aug 14 & 120 & 59 ; 59 + ssspm j2356 - 3426 & j23561081 - 3426044 & m9.0 & l0.5 & m9.3 & 12.95 & 0.98 & 2007 sep 16 & 120 & 37 ; 37 + ssspm j2400 - 2008 & j23595762 - 2007394 & m9.5 & l1 & m8.9 & 14.38 & 1.13 & 2008 jul 14 & 120 & 37 ; 37 + ccccc h@xmath25o-@xmath87 & 1.14 - 1.165 & 1.26 - 1.285 & 1.15 @xmath21 m h@xmath25o & 1 + ch@xmath22-@xmath87 & 1.315 - 1.335 & 1.26 - 1.285 & 1.32 @xmath21 m ch@xmath22 & 1 + h@xmath25o-@xmath88 & 1.48 - 1.52 & 1.56 - 1.60 & 1.40 @xmath21 m h@xmath25o & 1 + ch@xmath22-@xmath88 & 1.635 - 1.675 & 1.56 - 1.60 & 1.65 @xmath21 m ch@xmath22 & 1 + h@xmath25o-@xmath89 & 1.975 - 1.995 & 2.08 - 2.10 & 1.90 @xmath21 m h@xmath25o & 1 + ch@xmath22-@xmath89 & 2.215 - 2.255 & 2.08 - 2.12 & 2.20 @xmath21 m ch@xmath22 & 1 + @xmath90 & 2.06 - 2.10 & 1.25 - 1.29 & @xmath91 color & 1 + @xmath88-dip & 1.61 - 1.64 & 1.56 - 1.59 + 1.66 - 1.69 & 1.63 @xmath21 m feh / ch@xmath22 & 2 + @xmath89-slope & 2.06 - 2.10 & 2.10 - 2.14 & @xmath89-band shape / cia h@xmath25 & 3 + @xmath87-slope & 1.27 - 1.30 & 1.30 - 1.33 & 1.28 @xmath21 m flux peak shape & 4 + @xmath87-curve & 1.04 - 1.07 + 1.26 - 1.29 & 1.14 - 1.17 & curvature across @xmath87-band & 4 + @xmath88-bump & 1.54 - 1.57 & 1.66 - 1.69 & slope across @xmath88-band peak & 4 + h@xmath25o-@xmath92 & 1.04 - 1.07 & 1.14 - 1.17 & 1.15 @xmath21 m h@xmath25o & 4 + cl spt vs. ch@xmath22-_h _ & best fit curve : @xmath93 , @xmath28 = 0.0354 . + & select points below the @xmath94 curve . + h@xmath25o-_j _ vs. ch@xmath22-_h _ & intersection of : @xmath95 and @xmath96 . + & select points on lower left corner . + h@xmath25o-_j _ vs. _ h_-bump & intersection of : @xmath97 and @xmath96 . + & select points on upper left corner . + ch@xmath22-_j _ vs. ch@xmath22-_h _ & intersection of : @xmath98 and @xmath99 . + & select points on lower left corner . + ch@xmath22-_j _ vs. _ h_-bump & intersection of : @xmath100 , @xmath101 , and @xmath102 . + & select points on upper left corner . + ch@xmath22-_h _ vs. _ j_-slope & intersection of : @xmath103 , @xmath104 , and @xmath105 . + & select points on upper left corner . + ch@xmath22-_h _ vs. _ j_-curve & best fit curve : @xmath106 , @xmath28 = 0.088 . + & select points above the @xmath107 curve , up to ch@xmath22-_h _ = 1.03 . + ch@xmath22-_h _ vs. _ h_-bump & best fit curve : @xmath108 , @xmath28 = 0.013 . + & select points below the @xmath94 curve , down to _ h_-bump = 0.92 . j_-slope vs. _ h_-dip & intersection of @xmath109 and @xmath104 . + & select points on lower right corner . + _ j_-slope vs. _ h_-bump & intersection of : @xmath110 and @xmath102 . + & select points on upper right corner . + _ k_-slope vs. h@xmath25o-_y _ & best fit curve : @xmath111 , @xmath28 = 0.064 . + & select points above the @xmath107 curve and between _ k_-slope = 0.93 - 0.96 . + _ j_-curve vs. _ h_-bump & best fit curve : @xmath112 , @xmath28 = 0.048 . + & select points above the @xmath107 and greater than _ j_-curve = 2.00 and _ h_-bump = 0.92 . + lccrcccl 2mass j02361794 + 0048548 & [email protected] & [email protected] & @xmath113 & [email protected] & [email protected] & 1 & + sdss j093113.23 + 280227.1 & [email protected] & [email protected] & @xmath114 & [email protected] & [email protected] & 1 & v , b + 2mass j13114227 + 3629235 & [email protected] & [email protected] & @xmath114 & [email protected] & [email protected] & 5 & v + 2mass j13411160 - 30525049 & [email protected] & [email protected] & @xmath115 & [email protected] & [email protected] & 1 & v + 2mass j14532589 + 1420418 & [email protected] & [email protected] & @xmath114 & [email protected] & [email protected] & 1 & v , ( b ) + 2mass j20261584 - 2943124 & [email protected] & [email protected] & @xmath114 & [email protected] & [email protected] & 4 & v + 2mass j02060879 + 22355930 & [email protected] & [email protected] & @xmath116 & [email protected] & [email protected] & 1 & + denis - p j04272708 - 1127143 & [email protected] & [email protected] & @xmath117 & [email protected] & [email protected] & 1 & + 2mass j10365305 - 3441380 & [email protected] & [email protected] & @xmath114 & [email protected] & [email protected] & 1 & + 2mass j10595138 - 2113082 & [email protected] & [email protected] & @xmath114 & [email protected] & [email protected] & 1 & v + sdss j142227.20 + 221557.5 & [email protected] & [email protected] & @xmath118 & [email protected] & [email protected] & 1 & b + wise j16235970 - 0508114 & [email protected] & [email protected] & @xmath114 & [email protected] & [email protected] & 1 & + 2mass j17072529 - 0138093 & [email protected] & [email protected] & @xmath113 & [email protected] & [email protected] & 1 & + 2massi j1711457 + 223204 & [email protected] & [email protected] & @xmath114 & [email protected] & [email protected] & 6 & v + 2mass j11181292 - 0856106 & [email protected] & [email protected] & @xmath119 & [email protected] & [email protected] & & b + sdss j141624.09 + 134826.7 & [email protected] & [email protected] & @xmath114 & [email protected] & [email protected] & & b + 2mass j15150083 + 4847416 & [email protected] & [email protected] & @xmath119 & [email protected] & [email protected] & 1 & b + 2mass j17114559 + 4028578 & [email protected] & [email protected] & @xmath114 & [email protected] & [email protected] & & b + 2mass j03205965 + 1854233 & [email protected] & [email protected] & @xmath120 & [email protected] & [email protected] & & v + 2mass j03264453 + 1919309 & [email protected] & [email protected] & @xmath121 & [email protected] & [email protected] & & v + 2mass j03303847 - 2348463 & [email protected] & [email protected] & @xmath122 & [email protected] & [email protected] & & + 2mass j03301720 + 3505001 & [email protected] & [email protected] & @xmath123 & [email protected] & [email protected] & & + 2mass j03440891 + 0111249 & [email protected] & [email protected] & @xmath124 & [email protected] & [email protected] & & + 2mass j04024315 + 1730136 & [email protected] & [email protected] & @xmath125 & [email protected] & [email protected] & & + 2mass j04430581 - 3202090 & [email protected] & [email protected] & @xmath126 & [email protected] & [email protected] & 1 & b + 2mass j08433328 + 1024435 & [email protected] & [email protected] & @xmath127 & [email protected] & [email protected] & & + 2mass j08475148 + 0138110 & [email protected] & [email protected] & @xmath128 & [email protected] & [email protected] & & + 2mass j14232186 + 6154005 & [email protected] & [email protected] & @xmath129 & [email protected] & [email protected] & 3 & v + 2mass j14493784 + 2355378 & [email protected] & [email protected] & @xmath130 & [email protected] & [email protected] & 2 & v + 2mass j15412408 + 5425598 & [email protected] & [email protected] & @xmath123 & [email protected] & [email protected] & & + 2mass j16403561 + 2922225 & [email protected] & [email protected] & @xmath130 & [email protected] & [email protected] & & + 2mass j17175402 + 64274503 & [email protected] & [email protected] & @xmath131 & [email protected] & [email protected] & & + 2mass j19064847 + 4011068 & [email protected] & [email protected] & @xmath132 & [email protected] & [email protected] & & + 2mass j20472471 + 1421526 & [email protected] & [email protected] & @xmath133 & [email protected] & [email protected] & & v + 2mass j23311807 + 4607310 & [email protected] & [email protected] & @xmath134 & [email protected] & [email protected] & & + Abstract:

Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.

Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered . Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video . Paper: an empirical tenet in the study of accreting compact objects is that their maximum radiative luminosity is about eddington luminosity , that is the limit where the inward - directed gravitational force is balanced by the outward - directed radiation force . for spherical accretion of fully ionized hydrogen , the eddington limit can be written as @xcite @xmath5 where @xmath6 is the thomson scattering cross section , @xmath7 is the proton mass , and @xmath8 is the black hole ( bh ) mass . the x - ray luminosity is generally used as a good proxy for the bolometric luminosity for accreting neutron stars and stellar mass bhs . the eddington argument proved very valuable in the early stages of x - ray astrophysics , to show that most galactic x - ray binaries are neutron stars @xcite . later on , dynamical mass measurements confirmed the existence of a population of galactic bhs with masses @xmath9@xmath10 ( * ? ? ? * for a review ) : they also satisfy the eddington limit , with peak luminosities @xmath11 erg s@xmath12 . the _ einstein _ satellite revealed for the first time a small number of non - nuclear x - ray sources in nearby galaxies ( particularly , in star - forming galaxies ) with apparent luminosities @xmath13 @xcite . however , it was not immediately clear whether these sources could be a distinct class from galactic stellar mass bh candidates , which were just being discovered around the same years . _ s relatively crude spatial resolution allowed for the possibility of source confusion in compact star - forming regions ; lack of long - term monitoring made it hard to distinguish between persistently luminous sources and transient events , _ e.g. _ , young supernovae ( sne ) missed by optical observers . in the following decade , as nearby galaxies were repeatedly observed with x - ray satellites such as _ rosat _ and _ asca _ , with superior spectral coverage and resolution , it became clear that some of those non - nuclear sources could not be sne , and had apparent luminosities well above the eddington limit of typical galactic stellar mass bhs . for example , the `` most likely interpretation '' of the brightest non - nuclear source in the spiral galaxy ngc1365 was `` an ultra - powerful x - ray binary , with either a highly super - eddington low - mass black hole or a very massive black hole '' with @xmath14@xmath15 , `` which may pose a challenge for stellar evolution models '' @xcite ; a third scenario , beamed emission , was also proposed for other sources @xcite . thirteen years later , distinguishing between those three alternative scenarios remains the unsolved fundamental question for this class of sources , despite the wealth of new discoveries from _ chandra _ , _ xmm - newton _ , _ suzaku _ and _ swift _ , intensive modeling of their x - ray spectral and timing properties , and integrating studies of their multiband counterparts . for a while , different names have been in use to identify this class of accreting bhs : extraluminous x - ray binaries @xcite , superluminous x - ray sources @xcite , intermediate - luminosity x - ray objects @xcite . in recent years , the community consensus has settled on ultraluminous x - ray sources ( ulxs ) , adopting the terminology first used by japanese _ asca _ teams @xcite . a handful ulxs are observed to exhibit strong x - ray variability at time scales as short as minutes @xcite , and many others have shown random variation at long time scales from days , weeks to years @xcite , confirming their compact nature . they are 10100 times more luminous than galactic black hole binaries ( bhbs ) , whose peak luminosity is about @xmath16 . as the eddington limit is proportional to the bh mass , this suggests that ulxs may contain bhs at least 10100 times more massive than galactic ones which are typically of 10 @xmath1 , and thus represents a new class of bhs with masses in the range of @xmath3@xmath4 @xmath1 , intermediate between stellar mass and supermassive bhs . however , some models suggest that the eddington limit could be violated by a factor up to @xmath1710 for stellar mass bhs @xcite , and the x - ray luminosity may be overestimated due to anisotropic emission caused by geometric beaming expected at high accretion rate @xcite . in these circumstances , intermediate mass black holes ( imbhs ) are not required to interpret ulxs . a combination of super - eddington and mildly beamed emission from stellar mass bhs could account for ulxs with an apparent luminosity up to @xmath17@xmath18 @xcite . some objects other than bhbs may appear like ulxs if their timing or multiwavelength properties are unavailable . young sne , especially of type iin , could be as luminous as @xmath19 in the x - ray band @xcite . their x - ray spectrum is usually thermal and soft , and will not show chaotic variability . young x - ray pulsars could theoretically be more luminous than @xmath16 but the number of such sources appears to be very small @xcite . in general , these objects can be distinguished from accreting sources with variability @xcite , but it is possible that a sn leaves behind a compact remnant which becomes x - ray luminous when a fallback disk forms @xcite and mixed properties may be seen . in a survey of ulxs in nearby galaxies with archival _ xmm - newton _ data , it was found that the x - ray spectra of a few sources can be decomposed into a power - law component plus a thermal plasma , and in one of them x - ray variability was detected , suggesting that they may be recent sne with an accreting compact core @xcite . background active galactic nuclei ( agn ) that happen to lie behind a nearby galaxy could be misidentified as ulxs in the galaxy . their cosmological location could be revealed if redshift is measured from optical lines ( _ e.g. _ , * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? the fraction of background objects is usually high in massive , elliptical galaxies ( _ e.g. _ , * ? ? ? * ) . many ulxs are found to be spatially associated with nebulae , young star clusters , or globular clusters ; these are most likely located in the galaxy rather than foreground or background objects . even if they are identified as bhbs , their nature is still not unique in terms of the companion star ( low mass or high mass ) , the mode of the mass transfer ( roche - lobe overflow or wind - fed ) , or the mass of the accretor ( stellar mass or intermediate mass ) . for example , @xcite found that ulxs in young , star forming galaxies are much more variable than in old , elliptical galaxies ( associated with globular clusters ) . no matter what their nature is , ulxs are of great interest in astrophysics . if they are imbhs , their formation mechanism could be rather different from typical stellar mass bhs ; extreme environment , more massive and/or less abundant progenitors are likely required @xcite . imbhs could have played an important role in the formation of supermassive bhs in the early universe and be important targets to search for gravitational wave emission @xcite . instead , if they are stellar mass bhs , it is interesting to investigate why they are so distinct from their galactic cousins . they may be good candidates for the study of the accretion physics at near or super eddington accretion rates @xcite , and they may shed light on binary stellar evolution channels not seen in our galaxy . ulxs are usually defined as non - nuclear , point - like objects which at least once have been observed at an apparent isotropic x - ray luminosity higher than that of stellar mass galactic bhs : typically , @xmath20 erg s@xmath12 in the 0.310 kev band . some authors ( _ e.g. _ * ? ? ? * ) prefer to use @xmath21 ergs s@xmath12 , that is the eddington limit of the heaviest stellar bh ( @xmath22 ) expected at normal metallicity @xcite , to exclude a large number of `` faint '' ulxs that should be similar to normal galactic bhbs . such an empirical definition may have ambiguities and also include young x - ray pulsars , sne , and sn remnants as mentioned above . the consensus in the ulx community is to restrict the definition of ulxs to accreting bhs . therefore , we define ulxs as _ non - nuclear accreting bhs with peak luminosities inferred assuming isotropic emission above the eddington limit of normal stellar mass bhs_. this definition is confined to compact objects that are most likely accreting from a companion star in a binary system , but more exotic possibilities , for example isolated imbhs accreting via the bondi process from the surrounding medium are not excluded a priori . observationaly , variability information is required to define a ulx . recently , many ulxs are found to have a mechanical power output as high as in radiation @xcite . in one of them , the mechanical output is dominant while the radiative output is way below the ulx threshold @xcite . this source is apparently not a ulx , but speculated to be an offset ulx or quiescent ulx ( see section [ sec : bub ] for details ) . we thus define them as `` ultrapowerful sources ( upss ) '' for completeness , to standard for the same population of sources perhaps in a different state or viewing angle . a _ rosat_/hri catalog of luminous , non - nuclear x - ray sources by @xcite proved to be very important for bringing ulxs to the forefront of research , and for emphasizing the possible observational link with theoretically - predicted intermediate mass bhs , with masses @xmath23 . larger and more systematic x - ray source catalogs based on re - analysis of archival _ rosat_/hri data soon followed : in particular , by @xcite , by @xcite , and by @xcite , which included 106 sources above @xmath16 erg s@xmath12 . the first xmm - newton catalog was done by @xcite . catalog with 154 sources in 82 galaxies was produced by @xcite , and 226 objects were included in the catalog by @xcite , compiled from mixed literature sources . such works allowed the first population studies of these objects as a well recognized group , and in relation to the properties of their host galaxies . they also provided the rationale for longer , targeted observations with _ chandra _ and _ xmm - newton_. today , the largest catalog @xcite is based on the 2xmm serendipitous survey , and contains 470 ulxs , of which 367 not listed in previous compilations . updated catalogs based on _ chandra _ observations have been compiled by @xcite and @xcite . there are three basic ways to explain non - nuclear systems with apparent accretion luminosities @xmath24 erg s@xmath12 , using only standard accretion physics already included in @xcite s model . we can either increase the mass of the bh ( thus , increasing its eddington limit ) , or attribute the enhanced brightness to beamed emission , or require a mass accretion rate high enough to allow the source to exceed the eddington limit by a factor of a few . it is also possible that the most luminous ulxs may be explained by a combination of all three factors . assuming solar abundances , the _ apparent _ luminosity . ] of an accreting bh is : @xmath25 @xcite , where @xmath26 is the beaming factor , and @xmath27 is the dimensionless accretion rate at large radii ( typically , the mass transfer rate from the donor star ) , that is normalized to the eddington accretion rate , typical of efficient disk accretion ; hence , a dimensionless accretion rate @xmath28 produces a luminosity @xmath29 . other authors prefer to define @xmath30 , in which case the eddington limit is reached at @xmath31 . ] : @xmath32 . let us examine the main tenets of these alternative or complementary scenarios . _ strong beaming _ ( @xmath33 ) a decade ago , accreting bhs with strongly beamed emission were already well known in extragalactic astronomy ( bl lac objects and blazars : * ? ? ? * ) , and at least one galactic bh ( ss 433 ) was known to have semi - relativistic jets , massive outflows and likely anisotropic emission . naturally , a possible explanation for the early sample of _ rosat _ ulxs was that they were microblazars , or ss 433-like objects seen face - on @xcite . the relativistic beaming scenario soon ran into several fatal difficulties . it predicts that for every ulxs , there should also be a large number of lower - luminosity beamed sources : @xmath34 sources with apparent @xmath35 erg s@xmath12 for every ulx at @xmath36 erg s@xmath12 ; but there is no evidence of this population @xcite . instead , empirical luminosity functions show only @xmath9@xmath37 sources more luminous than @xmath16 erg s@xmath12 for every ulx at @xmath19 erg s@xmath12 @xcite , consistent with the higher end of the high - mass x - ray binary luminosity function . there is also no multiband evidence of the large number of jet sources beamed in other directions , required by this scenario @xcite . conversely , the presence of photoionized bubbles around several ulxs ( for example holmberg ii x-1 : @xcite ; ngc5408 x-1 : @xcite ) requires quasi - isotropic x - ray emission with luminosities @xmath38 erg s@xmath12 . finally , the majority of ulxs do not have radio counterparts and/or rapid x - ray variability , expected for relativistic beaming . for all those reasons , relativistic beaming is now ruled out as a general scenario . _ mild beaming and/or super - eddington accretion _ ( @xmath39 , @xmath40 ) when the accretion rates exceeds the eddington limit , radiatively - driven outflows are launched from the inner part of the disk , inside the spherization radius where the disk becomes geometrically thick @xcite . it was suggested @xcite that the wind may produce a funnel wall that scatters and collimates the emission along the axis perpendicular to the disk plane . the apparent high luminosity of ulxs is then a combination of this mild collimation ( with @xmath41 , @xcite ) and mild super - eddington emission ( @xmath42 ) . in this scenario , accretion rates @xmath31@xmath43 are enough to explain most or all ulxs up to luminosities @xmath44 erg s@xmath12 with bh masses @xmath45 . recent numerical radiation - magneto - hydrodynamical simulations @xcite supported and advanced earlier analytical results ( slim disk models ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ) , and the radiation - hydrodynamical simulations of , among others , @xcite . an important result of the simulations is that even a moderately super - critical mass supply @xmath46 can produce a total luminosity @xmath47 ( in rough agreement with the standard analytical scaling used earlier ) , and an apparent luminosity @xmath48 for face - on observers , due to mild collimation in the magnetized outflow @xcite . an alternative explanation for ulxs relies on super - critical accretion but does not require collimation of the emerging radiation . it was suggested that radiation pressure - dominated accretion disks have strong density inhomogeneities due to the development of photon - bubble instabilities @xcite . radiation would escape from such disk regions at rates @xmath49 times above the classical eddington limit for stellar mass bhs . _ quasi - isotropic eddington luminosity _ ( @xmath50 , @xmath51 ) although some models and simulations offer us compelling reasons to ignore the eddington limit as a constraint for the ulx interpretation , some authors remain wary of this scenario . they point out that the eddington limit works well for galactic bhs and neutron stars . more significantly , the isotropic bolometric luminosity of the whole population of @xmath52 quasars at redshift @xmath53 in the sloan digitized sky survey is strongly eddington - limited at all bh masses , with only a very small fraction of sources between 1 and 3 @xmath54 @xcite . perhaps like the bumblebee , the eddington limit should not fly , but does . thus , it is argued that the null hypothesis for ulxs should be that their luminosities are @xmath55 , despite the difference on the gas reservoir between agn and binary systems , and their radiative anisotropy is only a factor of @xmath56 ( a standard accretion disk has a beaming factor @xmath57 in the absence of any other collimation ) . these conditions are possible to explain most ulxs up to a few @xmath58 with accreting bhs of masses @xmath59 , which is the theoretical upper limit for a direct collapse of a single stellar core in the current universe ( see section [ sec : bhmass ] ) . sources more luminous than that may require imbhs . for example , hlx-1 in eso243 - 49 , the most luminous ulx found to date , has a peak bolometric luminosity @xmath60 erg s@xmath12 @xcite . if it is eddington limited , a black hole mass of at least @xmath61 is inferred . even if super - eddington emission is allowed , an imbh is required . _ quasi - isotropic sub - eddington luminosity _ ( @xmath62 , @xmath63 ) finally , it is possible that ulxs are accreting at sub - eddington accretion rates with nearly isotropic emission or disk beaming , which requires the compact objects to be imbhs ( @xmath64 ) . then we expect to see similar state transition and x - ray spectral properties from both ulxs and galactic bhbs , scaled only by the mass . the emission scenarios outlined above require three different ranges of bh masses , with different formation mechanisms . _ ordinary stellar mass bhs _ ( @xmath65 ) the first advantage of explaining ulxs with ordinary stellar mass black holes ( smbhs ) is that we already have direct evidence of their existence in the local universe . there are more than 20 bhs identified in x - ray binaries with dynamically measured masses @xmath9@xmath10 ( for reviews see * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ) . in the milky way , the most massive smbhs are those in grs 1915@xmath66105 ( @xmath67 ; * ? ? ? * ) and in cygnus x-1 ( @xmath68 ; * ? ? ? a similarly massive bh is found in m33 x-7 ( @xmath69 @xmath1 ; * ? ? ? an accreting binary system in the nearby starburst galaxy ic 10 @xcite contains a bh with a mass of @xmath70@xmath71 ( the mass uncertainty is mainly due to the unconstrained companion mass and inclination angle of the binary plane ) . the second advantage is that they are the easiest bhs to form : standard stellar models predict smbhs as the endpoint of individual massive star evolution , for a wide range of stellar masses and metallicities . thus , the strictest constraints to smbh models for ulxs come not from the bh formation process , but from the extreme super - eddington accretion , beaming and outflows required by these models . _ massive stellar bhs _ ( @xmath72 ) the mass of a compact remnant depends both on the initial mass of the stellar progenitor , and on how much mass is lost through stellar winds during the stellar lifetime @xcite . radiatively - driven winds from massive stars are strongly dependent on their metallicity @xcite . therefore , metallicity plays an important role in stellar evolution and determines the maximal mass of a bh that can be formed via core collapse . @xcite argued that the collapse of a single star can form a bh up to @xmath73 at solar metallicity , @xmath74 at 0.3 times solar metallicity , and @xmath75 at 0.01 times solar metallicity ; consistent results ( upper bh mass limit @xmath76 at low metallicities ) that are obtained by @xcite and @xcite . these results can well explain the inferred bh masses in galactic x - ray binaries ( average metallicity close to the solar value ) and in the ic 10 source ( metallicity @xmath77 solar ) . in summary , current stellar evolution models predict a bh remnant distribution peaked around @xmath78 , with a tail extending up to @xmath59 . as the formation of stellar bhs more massive than @xmath79 may require rarer , more extreme conditions , we will refer to them as `` massive stellar black holes ( msbhs ) '' . there is another interesting physical difference between smbh and msbh formation , in addition to different progenitor mass and metallicity : smbhs are probably formed through a sn explosion and subsequent rapid fallback ; msbhs are probably formed from direct core collapse without an explosion @xcite . this is because for the more massive objects , the gravitational energy released during core collapse is not enough to unbind and expel the stellar envelope . at low metallicities , the threshold for direct collapse is an initial stellar mass @xmath80 @xcite ; at solar metallicity , even the most massive stars may lose enough mass in winds and explode as sne . _ intermediate mass bhs _ ( @xmath81@xmath4 @xmath1 ) to produce an imbh of @xmath82@xmath83 , the core collapse of an isolated star in the current epoch is not a viable process . this is not because of the lack of very massive stars ( in fact , several stars with initial masses @xmath84@xmath85 may exist in the lmc ; * ? ? ? * ) , but because helium cores more massive than @xmath86 ( corresponding to initial stellar masses @xmath87 at zero metallicities ) undergo an electron / positron pair - instability explosion that leads to the complete disruption of the star , without bh formation @xcite . however , a bh may form again if the helium core is more massive than @xmath88 , corresponding to initial stellar masses @xmath89 at zero metallicity @xcite . it has been suggested that metal - free population iii stars formed in the very early universe could reach masses of a few hundred @xmath90 @xcite , above the pair - instability limit , and thus may have collapsed into imbhs @xcite . in young and dense star clusters , dynamical friction could lead to massive stars sinking towards the center and undergoing runaway collisions and mergers on timescales @xmath91 yr . numerical simulations suggest that such a process may result in the formation of a huge star , which may subsequently collapse into an imbh @xcite . dynamical evidence for imbhs with masses @xmath92 has been proposed for a few globular clusters , _ e.g. _ , g1 in m31 @xcite , although the issue is still controversial @xcite . @xcite suggested that in massive and/or compact globular clusters , a central seed smbh may grow by up to a factor of 100 via accretion of gas lost by the first generation of cluster stars in their red - giant phase . imbhs may also wander in the halo of major galaxies , after tidal stripping of merging satellite dwarfs that contained nuclear bhs @xcite ; this is currently the most plausible explanations for the most extreme ulx found to date , hlx-1 in eso243@xmath9349 . to summarize , three types of non - nuclear bhs could be powering ulxs ( table [ tab : bh ] ) . cclc type & mass & progenitor & @xmath94 + smbh & @xmath1710 @xmath1 & normal star & @xmath56 + msbh & @xmath95100 @xmath1 & low - z star & @xmath96 + & & pop iii & + imbh & @xmath3@xmath4 @xmath1 & cluster core & @xmath97 + & & stripped nucleus & + assuming that ulxs are binary systems with a bh receiving matter directly from an individual donor star , we can try to fit them into the traditional classification of galactic x - ray sources , as either high - mass or low - mass x - ray binaries ( hmxbs and lmxbs , respectively ) . hmxbs have a massive ob donor star with a characteristic age @xmath98 yrs ; lmxbs have a low - mass donor ( often in the subgiant or giant phase ) with ages @xmath99 yrs ( _ e.g. _ * ? ? ? hmxbs are mostly found in spiral and irr galaxies , with current or recent star formation , while lmxbs populate old spheroidals and globular clusters . ulxs are found both in ellipticals and in spiral / irregular galaxies ; however , the most luminous ones are found predominantly in star - forming galaxies . specifically , more than two thirds of ulxs found in ellipticals are in the lowest luminosity range , with @xmath100 erg s@xmath12 @xcite , and can easily be explained as the upper end of the lmxb distribution , with bh masses @xmath101 . it was even suggested @xcite that all ulx candidates in ellipticals with apparent @xmath102 erg s@xmath12 could be dismissed as background or foreground sources . today , it is generally accepted that there are a few genuine ulxs in ellipticals at luminosities @xmath103@xmath104 erg s@xmath12 , but none has been found above @xmath19 erg s@xmath12 . in spirals , by comparison , one third of ulxs have luminosities @xmath105@xmath106 erg s@xmath12 , and about 10% have luminosities @xmath107 erg s@xmath12 @xcite . both early - type ( hubble types 0 to 4 ) and late - type ( hubble types 5 to 9 ) spirals may contain ulxs , with similar probability , within the current statistical error of the samples ; @xcite find slightly more ulxs in early - type spirals , while @xcite find slightly more in late types , due to the different spatial resolutions of the instruments . furthermore , the fact that a luminous ulx is found in a spiral galaxy does not imply that it has an ob donor star . many ulxs in spirals are not located in regions ( within a few 100s of pc ) with evidence of current or very recent star formation @xcite . using the optical color distribution in a sample of face - on host galaxies , @xcite found that the brightest ulxs turn on @xmath0@xmath108 myr after the end of star formation . characteristic ages @xmath109 myr for the surrounding stellar population were also found for example in the case of ngc1313 x-1 and x-2 @xcite , ic 342 x-1 @xcite , ngc4559 x-1 @xcite , and ngc 1073 ixo 5 @xcite . @xcite normalized the radial distance of all ulx candidates in their sample to the deprojected @xmath110 diameter of their host galaxies . they found that the ulx surface density profile is strongly peaked towards the center . the profile can be fitted with a sersic function , with a best - fit index consistent with a de vaucouleurs profile ( @xmath111 ) , and an exponential scale - radius @xmath112 . this finding suggests that the ulx population is intrinsically related to the stellar population of their host galaxies . less centrally concentrated distributions would be expected if most ulxs were primordial halo relics such as population iii remnants , or nuclear bhs of accreted satellite galaxies . a _ chandra _ sample of ulxs in 58 face - on star - forming galaxies within 15 mpc , studied in details by @xcite , does not show statistically significant associations between ulxs and young , massive ( @xmath113 ) star clusters , within @xmath114 regions . the same conclusion was found by @xcite for ulxs in the antennae galaxies . this is inconsistent with formation scenarios based on runaway core collapse and mergers of o stars inside a compact , young stellar cluster , leading to the possible formation of an imbh of a few hundred solar masses via direct collapse of the resulting superstar @xcite . in fact , most ulx host galaxies do not even have stellar clusters sufficiently massive and compact to satisfy the requirements for runaway core collapse . in theory , imbhs could be formed inside clusters that have since dispersed . however , the evaporation timescale of such clusters would be too long to explain the observed association of many ulxs with young ( @xmath115 myr ) stellar populations . here , we further quantify the association between ulx populations and host galaxy properties . @xcite studied 107 ulxs in a complete sample of 127 nearby galaxies ( @xmath116 mpc ) , selected to be above the completeness limit of both the uppsala galaxy catalog and the _ infrared astronomical satellite _ ( _ iras _ ) survey . the total star formation rate ( sfr ) of the galaxies in the sample is @xmath117 yr@xmath12 based on the _ iras _ data , consistent with other measurements of star formation based on the h@xmath118 and [ o@xmath119ii ] indicators @xcite . this , in turn , corresponds to an sfr density @xmath120 yr@xmath12 mpc@xmath121 in the local universe . finding @xmath122 ulxs in that volume , after correcting for incompleteness and background interlopers , implies that we expect , on average , @xmath123 ulxs for a sfr of @xmath124 yr@xmath12 , and 1 ulx in a volume of @xmath125 mpc@xmath121 . this is consistent with the hmxb luminosity function in local star - forming galaxies : @xcite find @xmath34 sources with @xmath126 erg s@xmath12 ( corresponding to @xmath127 erg s@xmath12 in the ulx definition used in @xcite ) in a sample of galaxies with a total sfr @xmath128 yr@xmath12 . the average specific frequency in star - forming galaxies , in the local universe , is 1 ulx per @xmath129 , for galaxies with dynamical mass of @xmath130 @xcite . this rate decreases for increasing galaxy mass , scaling as @xmath131 @xcite . in elliptical galaxies , the specific rate is 1 ulx per @xmath132 @xcite . thus , it appears that low - mass spirals and irregulars are more efficient at producing ulxs , per unit mass . this is true at least down to galaxy masses @xmath133 . there may be two reasons why low - mass galaxies contain more ulxs per unit mass @xcite . one is that their sfr per unit mass is higher , so they are more efficient at producing ulxs . the other is that they have lower metal abundances , which may favor the formation of heavier stellar bhs from the collapse of massive o stars @xcite . however , it is suggested by @xcite that the metallicity does not affect the ulx production strongly after comparing two pairs of colliding galaxies . finally , it is often noted that many luminous ulxs reside in colliding or strongly interacting galaxies : the antennae @xcite , the cartwheel @xcite , the mice @xcite , ngc4485/90 @xcite , ngc7714/15 @xcite , ngc3256 @xcite , and a few more arp galaxies . this may simply be due to the fact that colliding galaxies have the largest sfr , and the number of ulxs scales with the recent sfr . the cumulative luminosity function ( lf ) of a population of accreting sources ( also known as @xmath134@xmath135 curve ) is expected to have a break or cut - off at the eddington luminosity of the most massive objects in the population . therefore , in the absence of direct mass measurements , the lf can be used as a rough indicator of the maximum mass . in fact , things are not so simple . the lf of x - ray binaries in our galaxy and in other nearby galaxies does not show any features at @xmath136 erg s@xmath12 , eddington limit of the neutron star population . moreover , the location of the upper cutoff may be a function both of mass ( via the eddington limit ) and of the age of the population , since the most luminous sources tend to have a shorter lifetime @xcite . thus , careful modeling is required to interpret a lf . matches the observed distribution better than an unbroken power - law , although the issue remains controversial ( _ cf . at the low - energy end , it also matches the slope and normalization of the hmxb distribution below @xmath16 @xcite . [ fig : lf ] ] with this caveat , we can use the ulx lf to test the scenario that ulxs in star - forming galaxies are mostly the high - luminosity tail of hmxbs ( plus some additional lmxbs ) , and ulxs in ellipticals are the high - luminosity tail of lmxbs . chandra _ and _ xmm - newton _ surveys of discrete x - ray sources in nearby galaxies have produced consistent results in agreement with this interpretation @xcite . in summary , they have all found that the cumulative lf of young x - ray populations in star - forming galaxies is a simple power - law with a slope @xmath137@xmath138 , while the cumulative lf of old x - ray populations in ellipticals and spiral bulges has a slope of @xmath139 . thus , short - lived hmxb - like sources dominate the high - luminosity end of the distribution . the normalization of the hmxb lf is proportional to the sfr ; the normalization of the lmxb lf is proportional to the stellar mass @xcite . what remains controversial is the behavior of the lf for the young ulx population above an x - ray luminosity @xmath38 erg s@xmath12 . from their _ chandra _ survey , @xcite find that a pure power - law @xmath140 provides a very poor fit to the data above that threshold ( figure [ fig : lf ] ) . a cut - off power - law model with @xmath141 provides an acceptable fit , with @xmath142 ( as required by the low - luminosity end of the lf ) and @xmath143 erg s@xmath12 . a very similar result was also found by @xcite , @xcite , and @xcite . the cut - off power - law model does not preclude the possibility of finding ulxs above @xmath144 erg s@xmath12 , but they would be increasingly rarer . it predicts @xcite 1 ulx with @xmath145 erg s@xmath12 within a radius of @xmath146@xmath147 mpc , and 1 ulx with @xmath148 erg s@xmath12 within a radius of @xmath149@xmath150 mpc . if the luminosity of a few ulxs recently discovered by @xcite is confirmed to be @xmath44 erg s@xmath12 , their existence would not be consistent with the cut - off model of @xcite , and may suggest a physically different population of accretors @xcite . and , of course , so does hlx-1 in eso243@xmath9349 with its peak outburst luminosity @xmath60 erg s@xmath12 @xcite . in contrast with those findings , the _ xmm - newton _ survey of @xcite does not see any turnover or cut - off in the cumulative lf above @xmath19 erg s@xmath12 , but their data can not rule out the presence of a similar break . at this stage , the discrepant result may be caused by a different binning technique , or by small - number statistics . both the @xcite and @xcite complete subsamples have only 5 sources with @xmath151 erg s@xmath12 out of a total of @xmath152 ulxs . a few other ulxs above that threshold are known , but can not simply be added to the lf because they do not form part of a complete sample . thanks to the large effective area of _ xmm - newton _ , combined with _ chandra _ observations , the spectral and timing properties of ulxs in the @xmath153@xmath37 kev band have been widely investigated and modeled over the last decade , even though the physical interpretation is still controversial . most of the x - ray studies have focused on bright ulxs ( @xmath154 ) in nearby galaxies ( @xmath155 mpc ) that allows spectral and timing analysis at high signal to noise ratios . in the next two sections , we review x - ray spectral and timing properties of bright ulxs and discuss their physical interpretation in comparisons with well - defined emission properties of galactic bhbs . phenomenologically , the energy spectra of ulxs in the @xmath153@xmath37 kev band can be divided into two groups : those that are consistent with a simple power - law , and those that are more complex @xcite . the latter mainly refers to a mild broad curvature ( convex shape ) over the whole band , a break or steepening above @xmath103 kev , or a soft excess below @xmath103 kev . a typical ulx spectral shape of the latter is sketched in figure [ fig : spec ] . many ulx spectra are well fitted by a single , absorbed power - law model . the photon index has a broad distribution , peaked at @xmath1562.0 @xcite but with a few much harder ( down to @xmath157 ) as well as much softer sources ( up to @xmath158 ) . the distribution does not appear to be bimodal ; there is no evidence of a gap between a `` hard state '' and a `` soft state '' . @xcite found that the power - law photon index tends to be harder at increasing luminosity ; a selection of ulxs with high luminosity ( @xmath159 erg s@xmath12 ) and hard power - law spectrum ( @xmath160 ) is also presented in @xcite . some of the hard sources with multiple observations show strong flux variability ( sometimes by an order of magnitude ) but constant photon index @xcite . similar behavior has been seen from galactic bhbs in the hard state @xcite . the x - ray luminosity in the hard state is usually @xmath161 times eddington @xcite , but during hard - to - soft state transitions the hard state can reach a luminosity up to 30% of eddington @xcite . thus , if hard power - law ulxs belong to the same canonical hard state defined in galactic bhs , their bh masses must be @xmath162 @xcite . a key signature of the hard state is the presence of compact , continuous radio jets . so far , the only possible detection of such jets is from ic 342 x-1 , with _ vla _ observations @xcite . using the fundamental plane of accreting bhs , @xcite estimate a compact object mass @xmath163@xmath164 . further observations are needed to spectrally constrain the nature of the radio core in this system . m82 x-1 is another good candidate for hard state ulxs . this source displays low frequency quasi - periodic oscillations ( qpos ) @xcite above a band - limited broad noise component , and its x - ray spectrum is a featureless power - law with a photon index @xmath165 @xcite . we note that m82 x-1 may be one of the very few ulxs that change their spectral state during outbursts , switching from a hard to a thermal state ( see section [ sec : curve ] ) . the hard spectrum may come from an advection - dominated accretion flow @xcite , a luminous hot accretion flow @xcite , a classical hot corona above the accretion disk @xcite , or from a combination of synchrotron and inverse - compton emission at the base of the jet @xcite . the first mechanism is limited to low accretion rates , but the latters can in principle operate also near the eddington luminosity and be relevant to ulxs @xcite . thus , an alternative interpretation favored by some authors is that hard power - law ulxs are not in the canonical low / hard state ; in other words , that the ulx hard state is not confined to luminosities @xmath166 eddington , and does not switch to a softer , disk - dominated thermal state as the accretion rate increases @xcite . we could call it a persistent high / hard state ( unknown in galactic bhbs ) , which can extend all the way to the eddington luminosity and smoothly morph into the very high state or other super - eddington accretion states . at the opposite end of the broad photon - index distribution , several ulxs with @xmath167 could be classified in the steep power - law state of galactic bhbs , typically found at near - eddington luminosities @xcite . the fact that there are no clear gaps , but instead a continuous distribution in photon index and an overlapping luminosity distribution between hard and soft ulxs may be an indication that the two regimes are smoothly connected . in conclusion , with longer x - ray observations and increasing photon statistics , we have reached a stage where we can identify and model a number of subtle spectral features on top of the simple power - law for many ulxs . in the rest of this section , we discuss a variety of spectral models that account for such features , and their physical implications . -free ) or a warm , thick comptonization model can adequately fit the hard curvature ; in the plot , a @xmath168-free model with @xmath169 kev and @xmath170 has an almost identical spectral shape to a comptt model with @xmath171 kev and @xmath172 , which is shifted vertically for clarity . for comparison , two diskbb models are plotted with @xmath173 and 2.5 kev , respectively . they are more curved and can not fit the energy spectrum over the 0.3 - 10 kev band . [ fig : spec ] ] in many ulxs , excessive residuals at low energies ( @xmath174 kev ) would be seen if one makes a power - law fit at high energies ; an additional disk component could adequately fit the excesses and the inferred disk inner temperature is around 0.10.4 kev . this cool , soft excess was first identified by @xcite in ngc 5408 x-1 ; @xcite showed the emission was point like and applied a disk plus power - law model . similar phenomena were then found in ngc 1313 x-1 and x-2 @xcite , and later on in many other ulxs @xcite . such a fit is analogous to the empirical model for galactic bhbs except that the disk is cooler and more luminous in ulxs than in smbhs at their high state @xcite . for a standard accretion disk @xcite extending to the last stable orbit around a bh , the inner disk temperature @xmath175 is a function of bh mass @xmath8 and total luminosity @xmath176 : @xmath177 where @xmath118 depends on the bh spin ( @xmath178 for a schwarzschild bh , @xmath179 for an extreme kerr bh ) , @xmath180 is a corrective factor that takes into account the no - torque condition at the innermost orbit , and @xmath181 is the spectral hardening factor @xcite . given the same spinning and correction factors , the bh mass is scaled with the disk inner temperature and luminosity as a function of @xmath182 thus , the low - temperature , high - luminosity characters of the assumed disk suggest that the emission arises from accretion onto imbhs . for comparison , the typical disk inner temperature is about 1 kev at a luminosity of @xmath183 for smbhs about 10 @xmath1 . the characteristic temperature for ulxs is usually around 0.10.4 kev and the luminosity is some @xmath16@xmath19 , suggestive of a bh mass of @xmath184 @xmath4 @xmath1 . however , the interpretation of soft excesses as emission from cool accretion disk has confronted challenges . @xcite argued that soft excesses could also be soft deficits depending on the energy band where the power - law is fitted . @xcite found similar soft excesses in both ulxs and less luminous x - ray sources , implying that they are not a unique signature of imbhs in a statistical sense . it is suggested that supercritical accretion may produce massive outflows , which are optically thick with soft , thermal emission at similar temperature , being another possible origin for the detected soft excesses @xcite . other authors @xcite have suggested that the soft excess does come from the disk surface , but much further away than the innermost stable orbit , where the disk may be obscured or replaced by an outflow or a scattering corona ( section [ sec : curve ] ) . in that case , the characteristic radius of the thermally - emitting disk region can not be used to infer the bh mass . repeated observations of an individual ulx may help test the cool disk model @xcite . if the disk touches the innermost stable orbit around the bh , one expects to see the disk luminosity vary to the 4th power of the inner temperature , @xmath185 , as well known in the thermal state of galactic bhbs @xcite . if , instead , the observed inner disk radius is the boundary between an outer standard disk and an inner corona or outflow , we expect that such transition will move further and further out at higher accretion rates when super - eddington . in the simplest outflow scenario , @xmath186 @xcite . this implies @xcite @xmath187 constant for a viscously heated outer disk and @xmath188 for a strongly x - ray - irradiated outer disk ( as is more likely the case in ulxs ) . most other plausible relations between @xmath189 and @xmath27 predict negative correlations between the disk luminosity and temperature , with slopes between @xmath190 and @xmath191 @xcite . a negative correlation between the luminosity and temperature is clearly detected for at least ngc 1313 x-2 and ic 342 x-1 @xcite . from a sample of 8 ulxs , @xcite found that the luminosity of the soft excesses scales with the temperature as @xmath192 , roughly consistent with the model prediction that the soft emission arises from a photosphere due to strong outflows from a supercritical disk and its temperature is determined by the spherization radius @xcite . on the contrary , a positive correlation is seen from ngc5204 x-1 ; however , it has a shallower slope @xmath193 @xcite . @xcite suggested , based on a disk atmosphere model , that the hardening correction factor becomes larger at increasing luminosity , and explains the apparent shallower slope in galactic bhs such as xte j1550@xmath93564 and h1743@xmath93322 . applying such a varying hardening correction , one can recover the @xmath194 relation for ngc5204 x-1 , which would favor the imbh scenario . however , this result is not robust yet : @xcite found that the positive correlation disappears or even becomes negative if one chooses a different lower energy bound for the spectral fitting . also , the disk contributes only @xmath195 of the 0.310 kev luminosity , inconsistent with the thermal dominant state . instead , if ulxs were imbhs , we would expect to see many of them in the canonical thermal state dominated by the soft disk component . in summary , using the disk parameters inferred from x - ray spectra to determine the bh mass is based on assumptions that have proved either incorrect or problematic for most sources . it was noted by @xcite and @xcite that high energy curvature / steepening is a common feature in high - quality ulx spectra . generally , the break / steepening could be fitted by a comptonization model with relatively low energy electrons and high optical depth @xcite . a few ulx spectra are mildly convex , formally consistent with a standard disk model . we thus discuss the physical implications of these models . with _ asca _ observations , a hot multicolor accretion disk model was found to fit the spectra of a number of ulxs ( _ e.g. _ * ? ? ? for those with relatively low temperatures ( @xmath196 kev ) , they could be explained by accretion onto smbhs or msbhs @xcite . the high temperature and luminosity may be explained by large bh spin @xcite , but this does not work for extreme cases where relatively small bh mass is required , which in turn is inconsistent with the observed high luminosity . for _ xmm - newton _ spectra , a single hot disk with absorption is usually unable to fit the data ; an additional component is required and dominates in the low energy band @xcite , and the disk component is not the dominant part @xcite . the presence of a soft component in addition to the hot disk is unusual in bhbs and does not have a simple physical interpretation . in general , the hot disk model is problematic . the standard disk emission is best known in the thermal state in bhbs , in which the x - ray spectrum is dominated by emission from a standard accretion disk ; plus , the x - ray variability is low , with no or weak qpos @xcite . so far , the thermal state may have been identified only in one case , m82 x-1 , constrained using both spectral and timing information . with simultaneous _ chandra _ and _ xmm - newton _ observations of m82 , @xcite found surprisingly that the previously known qpos in the source disappeared . the light curve was no longer highly variable and the power spectrum was consistent with that of white noise . the energy spectrum also changed dramatically from a straight power - law to a disk - like spectrum . fitting with a standard accretion disk model , the inferred luminosity and temperature from three repeated observations are consistent with a 4th power relation . all results are well consistent with that expected for the thermal state . the monitoring data from _ rxte _ indicate that these _ chandra _ and _ xmm - newton _ observations were made during the source outbursts , suggesting that m82 x-1 usually stays in the hard state and could transition to the thermal state during outbursts . fitting with a relativistic disk model , the bh is estimated to be a fast spinning imbh of 200800 @xmath1 . there are a few more sources @xcite which have shown spectral variability possibly consistent with a @xmath194 relation if fitted with a hot standard disk model . another group of five nearby ulxs consistent with the thermal state spectrum , based on x - ray spectral modeling , was discussed by @xcite . these sources all lie at the lower end of the ulx luminosity regime , and could be explained by kerr msbhs in the thermal state . they do not stand for the majority of ulxs , in particular those with a typical luminosity around @xmath19 . also , lack of fast timing information hampers a firm identification . therefore , it is generally accepted that the canonical thermal state is rare in ulxs @xcite . the slim disk can radiate near or moderately above the eddington limit estimated from spherical accretion @xcite . this super - eddington disk is thus a good candidate for ulx emission @xcite . when advective energy transport dominates over radiative cooling in an accretion disk , the radial temperature profile changes from @xmath197 for a standard disk to @xmath198 for a slim disk @xcite . an extended multicolor disk model called the @xmath168-free model was introduced , with the radial dependence @xmath168 on temperature ( @xmath199 ) being an additional free parameter @xcite , and used to explain ulx emission @xcite . @xcite investigated the energy spectra of four ulxs , ngc 5204 x-1 , ngc 4559 x-7/x-10 , and ngc 1313 x-2 , and found that they can be well fitted by the @xmath168-free model . interestingly , the best - fit @xmath168 value was found to be around 0.5 , consistent with that for a slim disk . in the luminosity vs. disk temperature diagram , the four ulxs and galactic bhbs appear to be in line with the same @xmath194 relation , suggesting that ulxs may be bhs of similar or slightly higher masses ( smbhs or msbhs ) but in the slim disk state . another successful test of the @xmath168-free or slim disk model was for m33 x-8 , which is marginally classified as a ulx but a good candidate for deep investigation owing to its relatively small distance ( _ e.g. , _ * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ) . @xcite first identified that an extra power - law component is required in addition to the @xmath168-free disk to fit the source spectrum . the best - fit @xmath168 value ( @xmath200 ) suggests notable advection in the disk , close to the slim disk nature rather than a standard one . these indicate that the slim disk state may be a natural extension of the canonical thermal state at supercritical accretion . this is consistent with the radiation - magnetohydrodynamic simulations that the hard , thermal and slim states could be produced under a single model with different accretion rates @xcite . however , the @xmath168-free model encounters difficulties in both observation and theory . in some sources , the disk inner temperature was found too high to be physically reasonable when fitted with the @xmath168-free model @xcite . if photon trapping is taken into account , the radial temperature profile is expected to be significantly flatter than @xmath201 within the trapping radius @xcite , in contrast to the spectrum predicted without considering photon trapping @xcite . also , numerical simulations suggest that dense , warm outflows are always associated with supercritical accretion @xcite , which would comptonize and obscure the emission from the underlying disk , see details in the following subsection . in galactic bhbs , high energy spectral curvature is also detected , but usually occurs at tens to hundreds of kev . it is interpreted as comptonization in a thin corona with temperatures typical of @xmath3 kev . however , the spectral curvature in ulxs suggests an electron temperature of a few kev and a scattering optical depth significantly higher than unity , indicative of a warm and thick corona . due to the presence of such a thick corona , the emission from the disk would be distorted and the previous interpretation , a simple summation of a cool disk and a warm corona @xcite , needs be modified consequently . @xcite revisited best quality _ xmm - newton _ data and concluded that two common features simultaneously exist in the energy spectrum of ulxs : soft excesses below 2 kev and high energy curvature above 2 kev . this is not frequently seen in the spectra of galactic bhbs when they are thought to accrete at sub - eddington level . thus , they suggested that ulxs represent a new state distinct from the four well - known states ( quiescent , hard , thermal , and steep power - law ) in galactic bhbs @xcite , and call it ultraluminous state . please refer to @xcite for a more detailed review of this state . the galactic bhb that comes closest to this state is xte j1550@xmath93564 at the peak of its 1998 september outburst . a coupled disk - corona model @xcite was proposed to explain such state , in which the disk and corona are not independent but share the total gravitational energy release . the un - scattered outer disk is responsible for the soft excesses , while the comptonized inner disk produces the hard , curved tail . the bh mass , estimated from the unmasked temperature and radius of the underlying disk , lies in the regime of smbhs or msbhs . numerical simulations of supercritical accretion indicates that radiation pressure would power strong outflows above the disk in the inner region @xcite . the wind is optically thick and warm ( a few kev ) , and would strongly comptonize the disk emission . at high accretion rate , the disk becomes thick and would collimate the radiation along the symmetric axis causing geometric , mild beaming with an apparent isotropic luminosity over the eddington limit by a factor up to @xmath1710 . this picture is consistent with the proposed ultraluminous state . observationally , from the spectral evolution of m33 x-8 , @xcite suggested that the outflow is launched at near - eddington luminosity , and the radius at which it is launched moves further out with increasing luminosity . if the comptonizing region is the fast outflow , rather than a static corona , it is possible that bulk motion @xcite can be as or more important than thermal comptonization , depending on the characteristics of the outflow @xcite . observationally , ulx spectra that can be formally fitted with thermal comptonization models can be equally well fitted with bulk motion models ( _ e.g. _ * ? ? ? the only difference is in the interpretation of the characteristic energy of the upscattering electrons . as noted by @xcite , simple physical considerations , comparisons with other astrophysical classes of outflows , and numerical simulations all suggest that super - eddington ulx outflows have a characteristic speed @xmath202 escape velocity from the launching radius , corresponding to a bulk kinetic energy @xmath203 kev for the outflowing electrons . this is similar to the characteristic energy of the spectral breaks . most ulxs and bhbs have considerable radiation output above 2 kev , while supersoft sources ( ssss ) have most of their energy released below 2 kev . canonical ssss are speculated to be powered by steady nuclear burning on the surface of white dwarfs @xcite . a number of supersoft ulxs have been discovered , whose spectrum is dominated by a cool blackbody component of tens to a hundred ev , being a distinct class from the majority of ulxs . these include m101 ulx-1 @xcite , antennae x-13 @xcite , m81 uls1 @xcite , ngc 4631 x1 @xcite , and ngc 247 ulx @xcite . at long timescales , most of these sources have shown dramatic variability with a luminosity change by a factor up to @xmath184 but with consistently low temperatures . a weak power - law tail is significantly detected in at least one source @xcite , but none of the supersoft ulxs has become a power - law dominated ulx or vice versa . fast timing noise was detected in two of them , m101 ulx-1 @xcite and ngc 247 ulx @xcite , down to a timescale around 100 s , indicating that they are not agn . the nature of these peculiar sources is very uncertain . they are unlikely powered by white dwarfs , because they are too luminous ( a few times @xmath16 ) and some of them are too hot ( @xmath204 ev ) . they are also unlikely to be due to cool disks around imbhs , because such disks can not have a huge variability with a constant temperature . one possible scenario is that their emission is produced by massive outflows from supercritical accreting sources viewed at a high inclination angle @xcite . a unification model ( supercritical accretion with thick outflows , see figure [ fig : model ] ) may be able to explain both normal , broad - band ulxs and less luminous , supersoft ulxs with different viewing angles . so far , we have briefly reviewed a variety of scenarios that can account for the observed ulx spectra ( see also figure [ fig : spec ] ) . in figure [ fig : model ] , we sketch the physical ingredients behind the most common combination of such models , which may be successfully used to explain the multiband spectrum of most ulxs . ] the study of long term spectral variability of ulxs mainly relies on pointed observations with _ chandra _ or _ xmm - newton _ , or quasi - regular snapshots with the x - ray telescope on board _ swift_. in addition , _ rxte _ has been used to monitor the brightest ( in terms of observed flux ) ulx in m82 . the most interesting science with these observations , in addition to the search for orbital periods , is perhaps to find state transitions known in galactic bhbs . canonical transitions between the low / hard and high / soft states were reported in ic 342 x-1 and x-2 with _ asca _ observations @xcite and also in holmberg ix x-1 with multiple missions @xcite . however , almost no such canonical state transitions have been reported in the _ chandra _ and _ xmm - newton _ era . in contrast , transitions between soft and hard states were found but not in a way similar to galactic sources @xcite . a major difference between ulxs and galactic bhbs is that most ulxs are persistent sources and have been bright since their discovery decades ago , while the latter are usually transients especially accreting from a low mass companion with roche lobe overflow . _ swift _ monitoring @xcite of bright ulxs have revealed flaring activity with a luminosity change by a factor of @xmath155 on time scales of days to months . in particular , @xcite found holmberg ix x-1 remains in the hard state as its flux varies , and @xcite found the x - ray spectral state is not correlated with the luminosity in holmberg ii x-1 . also , as mentioned previously in section [ sec : curve ] , @xcite found m82 x-1 may have changed from the hard state to thermal state during outbursts . there is one exceptional case . eso243@xmath9349 hlx-1 shows a low / hard to high / soft jump reminiscent of the canonical state transition @xcite . it also displays outbursts in a `` fast rise exponential decay '' pattern , very similar to those seen in galactic bhbs @xcite . however , the authors argued that the observed variability is unlikely triggered by disk instability due to inconsistent timescale . the power spectrum of galactic bhbs can be decomposed into broad components ( power - law red noise , band - limited noise , flat - top or zero - centered broad lorentzian , etc . ) and narrow components ( qpos ) . although we still know little about the physical origin of these temporal features , their phenomenology has proved useful in defining and identifying accretion states @xcite and possibly in determining bh masses via model independent calibrations ( _ e.g. _ * ? ? ? an important model - independent finding of @xcite , based on the study of sample of 16 bright ulxs , is that those sources can be divided into two groups defined by their short - term x - ray variability , even though they have similar energy spectra and luminosities . one group ( including among others ngc 5204 x-1 ) shows weak or absent variability on timescales at least as large as 100s . the other group ( including among others ngc 5408 x-1 ) has similar variability levels and power spectra as luminous galactic bhbs and agn in the observed frequency bandpass ( @xmath205@xmath206 hz ) . it is still unclear what suppresses short - term variability in one class but not the other . in galactic bhbs , high variability is often associated to non - thermal emission with steady jets ; low variability to thermal emission with no jets @xcite . in the following , we select four ulxs in which interesting structures have been found in their power spectra , shown in figure [ fig : psd ] . _ m82 x-1 , also known as m82 x41.4 + 60 _ @xcite first discovered low frequency qpos around 54 mhz from the m82 galaxy with both _ xmm - newton _ and _ rxte _ observations . by fitting the _ xmm - newton _ images to its point spread function with known source positions from _ chandra _ , @xcite identified that m82 x-1 is the source that produced the qpos , and interestingly , it was not the brightest x - ray source in m82 at the time of qpo discovery . a following _ xmm - newton _ observation revealed that the qpos have changed the central frequency from 54 mhz to 114 mhz , above a flat - top component with a low frequency break at 34 mhz @xcite . @xcite also found that the qpos changed frequency from 107 mhz to 120 mhz during the second observation , and a plausible harmonic ratio of 1:2:3 for qpo frequencies with _ these qpos , however , were undetected with three _ xmm - newton _ observations of similar depth , suggestive of a spectral state transition @xcite . _ ngc 5408 x-1 _ with a short _ xmm - newton _ observation , @xcite found the source is highly variable , and its power spectrum has a break at 2.5 mhz . @xcite reported the identification of narrow qpos around 20 mhz from the source , and confirmed the presence of the frequency break . the qpos are narrow and may show a pair with a 4:3 frequency ratio . a longer _ xmm - newton _ observation later detected the qpos at about 10 mhz and the energy spectral parameters of the source also changed @xcite . the qpo frequency was found to scale with the disk flux and also the spectral index of the power - law component . these correlations are analogous to that seen in galactic bhbs , suggesting that this ulx is in an emission state similar to sub - eddington sources . the qpo properties ( narrow , strong , with a flat - top continuum ) and the temporal - spectral evolution patterns suggest that the qpos are of type c and the compact object in ngc 5408 x-1 is an imbh . however , as the qpo frequency is not proportional to the break frequency of the continuum as expected , the identification as of type c was questioned and so was the imbh scenario @xcite ; they proposed that the source is super - eddington and the turbulence in the comptonization region gives rise to the observed variability . other authors have also rejected the imbh argument @xcite , pointing out that neither lower qpo frequencies nor larger , cooler disks can be used as indicators of higher bh masses in ulxs ; both findings may simply suggest that the visible inner radius of the disk has receded much further than the innermost stable orbit , and has been covered or replaced by a thick comptonizing region or outflow in the inner region . besides , @xcite also found that the source shows a linear correlation between the rms amplitude and flux , similar to that seen in bright bhbs and agn . _ m82 x42.3 + 59 _ this is a transient ulx in m82 @xcite . it could not be detected by _ chandra _ in its low state , but sometimes , was even brighter than m82 x-1 , being the most luminous source in m82 @xcite . with _ chandra _ observations , and also confirmed by a simultaneous _ xmm - newton _ observation once , @xcite discovered low frequency qpos around 3 - 4 mhz in its power spectrum . these qpos are wide and strong , appear above white noise , and can only be detected when the source is brighter than @xmath19 . this is consistent with a type a or b classification , but is inconsistent with the properties of type c qpos . _ ngc 6946 x-1 _ this source has the highest short - term variability found in a ulx , with a fractional rms amplitude of 60% integrated in the frequency range of 1 - 100 mhz @xcite . its power spectrum shows a flat - top continuum that breaks at about 3 mhz with possible quasi - periodic oscillations ( qpos ) near 8.5 mhz . ] the characteristic frequency alone usually is not a direct indicator of the bh mass , as these noise features can vary dramatically in a single source . however , correlations between the frequency and spectral parameters have been found , and the correlation patterns are thought to scale with the bh mass . the most common qpos seen in bhbs are of type c ( _ cf . the frequency of type c qpos are found to vary over a wide range . for example , the lowest detected frequencies in grs 1915 + 105 are around 1 mhz @xcite , even lower than the frequencies of all qpos detected in ulxs . a positive correlation between the qpo frequency and disk flux has been found for type c qpos in xte j1550@xmath93564 , gro j1655@xmath9340 and h 1743@xmath93322 @xcite . the qpo frequency also scales with the photon index of the power - law component in the energy spectrum ( _ e.g. _ * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? @xcite suggested that the qpo frequency scales inversely with the bh mass at a fixed power - law photon index , and thus one can infer the mass given spectral index @xcite . on the contrary , type a and b qpos show in a relatively narrow frequency range . the broad continuum seems to be a more reliable determinant of bh mass , as it is detected in both bhbs and agn and the scaling has been tested over a wide frequency and mass range . smbhs and agn appear to populate a `` variability plane '' defined by the bh mass , accretion rate , and @xmath207 , which is the frequency of the lower high - frequency lorentzian component in the power spectrum @xcite . limited by sensitivity , @xmath207 can not be detected in ulxs . based on a correlation between @xmath207 and the frequency of type c qpos , @xcite extended the variability plane to type c qpos that are visible in ulxs . the bh mass can be inferred from the x - ray luminosity ( here we adopt the radiatively efficient accretion case ) and type c qpo frequency as @xmath208 where the inequality is due to the unknown bolometric correction ( @xmath209 ) . although the `` variability plane '' is tested for a wide range of bh masses , the correlation between @xmath207 and @xmath210 has not been tested in ulxs and even the identification as of type c is questioned at least for ngc 5408 x-1 @xcite . attempts to scale bh mass with the variability amplitude ( rms ) have made great success in agn @xcite . however , it is found that ulxs are significantly less variable than agn , and a simple extrapolation could not be obtained @xcite . based on the correlations mentioned above , the bh masses inferred from the characteristic frequencies are all about @xmath184@xmath4 @xmath1 , indicating that ulxs contain imbhs . however , application of these mass scaling methods requires strong caveats . there are at least three problems . first , we are not sure whether the timing features detected in ulxs are the same type found to scale with bh masses in galactic bhbs ; for example , we are not sure whether the qpos in ngc 5408 x-1 are of type c @xcite . for other types of timing features ( _ e.g. _ , type a and b qpos ) , it is still not known whether their frequency is proportional to the bh mass @xcite . second , frequency - luminosity - mass relations have been calibrated and tested for galactic bhbs and agn in sub - eddington accretion , that is when the inner edge of the disk is constant or moves towards the innermost stable orbit as the accretion rate increases ( thus , increasing qpo frequencies ) . there is no empirical evidence that the scaling goes the same way in ulxs , which may be super - eddington systems where the visible inner edge of the disk recedes from the innermost stable orbit for increasing accretion rates ( thus , reducing qpo frequencies ) . the third problem is that we do not have enough signal - to - noise ratio to detect high - frequency qpos , which severely limits possibility of direct comparisons with galactic bhbs . in this section the `` optical counterpart '' refers to the point - like optical source that is spatially associated with the ulx ; sources with resolved structure , such as optical and radio nebulae , will be discussed in the next section . the optical emission from the counterpart could arise from the donor star or outer accretion disk , or both . it provides interesting information regarding the binary evolution history , nature of the donor star , disk geometry , and mode of mass transfer , and would also help constrain the bh mass . several groups have modeled x - ray irradiation in order to distinguish between the contributions of the outer disk and the donor star , and constrain the intrinsic stellar properties . @xcite applied their irradiation model to the photometric data for seven ulxs ; they suggested that donor stars are consistent with spectral type b or later , and the bh masses are in the range of @xmath0@xmath211 . @xcite computed evolution tracks of ulx counterparts on the color - magnitude diagram , assuming a massive companion orbiting an smbh or a msbh ; they applied their models to ngc1313 x-2 , suggesting a bh mass @xmath212@xmath211 . in addition to reproducing the observed colors and luminosity ( after accounting for irradiation and disk contribution ) , a donor star in a ulx must be able to supply a mass accretion rate @xmath213 yr@xmath12 , which requires roche lobe overflow , and to do it over a sufficiently long period of time to explain the observed number of ulxs per galaxy . binary population synthesis models have been developed and used to address this problem @xcite . modeling the binary evolution requires calculations of the mass transfer rate , the corresponding change in orbital separation , and the subsequent fate of the transferred mass . this in turn depends critically on whether we impose a strict eddington limit on the mass transfer rate that can be accepted by the bh ( with the rest being expelled in a wind ) , or instead we assume that the bh can accrete at higher rates . thus , for the same kind of donor star , the outcome in terms of x - ray luminosity and lifetime is very different depending on whether the primary is an eddington - limited stellar bh , a non - eddington - limited stellar bh , or an imbh . @xcite considered three characteristic families of binary evolution tracks , with different bh mass distributions : @xmath214@xmath10 , @xmath214@xmath215 , and a single - mass population of @xmath216 bhs . they built probability diagrams in different slices of parameter space ( optical color - magnitude diagram ; orbital period versus potential x - ray luminosity ; x - ray luminosity versus age ) , representing the total time spent by all the systems in those regions of parameter space . their main conclusion is that the most probable ulx system parameters correspond to high - mass donors ( @xmath217 ) , with orbital period between 1 and 10 days and characteristic age @xmath218 yr . in terms of bh mass , they found that both the @xmath216 bh population , and that with non - eddington - limited bhs up @xmath219 were consistent with the optical and x - ray observations and with the observed number of ulxs per galaxy ; the @xmath220@xmath211 bh mass range has not been tested yet . thanks to the sub - arcsecond resolution of _ chandra _ and _ hst _ , the optical counterparts of more than a dozen ulxs have been identified . these are done mainly by aligning _ chandra _ and _ hst _ images using objects with emission on both , to reduce the _ chandra _ x - ray position error from 0.6 to about 0.20.4 . @xcite collected all available data in the _ hst _ archive to investigate the optical properties of 13 ulxs , which can be summarized as follows . a. the x - ray to optical flux ratios and optical colors are consistent with that of lmxbs , but unlike hmxbs or agn . this indicates that the optical emission from ulxs is mainly due to reprocessing of x - rays on the outer accretion disk . as a consequence , one can not infer the spectral type of the companion star using optical colors directly . b. the broad band optical spectrum can be generally fitted with a power - law model ( @xmath221 ) . the distribution of the spectral index @xmath118 peaks between 1 and 2 , which is also consistent with disk irradiation models . c. the counterpart has unique optical properties within its neighborhood . nearby sources usually show a blackbody spectrum instead of a power - law spectrum . d. the optical emitting region is estimated to be large , of the order of @xmath222 cm , indicative of long binary periods ( @xmath109 days ) for smbh or msbh primaries , or shorter periods for imbhs . e. sources with multiple observations usually show strong , random variability on both magnitudes and colors . there are a few outliers showing peculiar properties . the optical spectra of ngc 2403 x-1 and m83 ixo 82 have a slope consistent with that of the standard disk emission , @xmath223 . m101 ulx-1 and m81 uls1 are more similar to hmxbs than lmxbs in terms of x - ray to optical flux ratios . ic 342 x-1 may show a blackbody - like spectrum instead of a power - law . more details can be found in @xcite . there have been a lot of observational efforts to determine the nature of the companion stars in nearby ulxs . so far , ngc 7793 p13 is the only ulx in which emission from the companion star is directly seen beyond reasonable doubt @xcite ; detection of narrow emission lines identifies the companion star as a late - b type supergiant with a mass @xmath79 . orbital periods may have been detected in a few sources . assuming roche - lobe overflow , the companion density can be simply determined from the binary period , @xmath224 g cm@xmath121 @xcite . m82 x-1 is the strongest case of a positive detection ; a monitoring program with _ rxte _ revealed a steady period of about 62 day @xcite , corresponding to a companion density of @xmath226 g cm@xmath121 . @xcite discovered a 115 day x - ray period from ngc 5408 x-1 with _ swift _ monitoring , and inferred a similar companion density of @xmath227 g cm@xmath121 ; however , the interpretation of that modulation as a binary period has been disputed @xcite . these claimed long periods imply an evolved donor star . possible detections include a 6.1 day period from ngc 1313 x-2 with _ hst _ observations @xcite ; however , low significance of the period was claimed by other groups @xcite . m82 x-1 is located near or within a super star - cluster mcg-11 with an age of 7 - 12 myr @xcite . ngc 1073 ixo 5 appears near a ring of star formation of 816 myr old @xcite . ngc 1313 x-2 is found near a star cluster with an age of 20 myr @xcite . ic 342 x-1 lies in a field with relatively old stellar objects , mostly older than 10 myr @xcite . the stellar field around ngc 1313 x-1 is at least 30 myr old @xcite . holmberg ix x-1 is suggested to be part of a loose cluster with an age @xmath115 myr @xcite . all those findings suggest that ulxs are in relatively old stellar environments with ages of at least 10 myr . an exceptional case is provided by a transient ulx recently discovered in m83 @xcite . it is located in an interarm region with a stellar population older than @xmath228 yr . _ hst _ observations when the system was probably in quiescence constrain the donor star to be @xmath229 . instead , _ observations during the recent outburst revealed a bright , blue counterpart with absolute @xmath230 magnitude @xmath231 , due to the irradiated outer disk and/or irradiated donor star . identification of the optical counterparts to ulxs is the first step for a potential dynamical mass measurement . @xcite found that the broad he ii @xmath232 line from ngc 1313 x-2 changed its velocity by about 380 km s@xmath12 between two observations . if this is due to binary motion of the disk , an upper limit on the bh mass of 50 @xmath1 can be placed . there have been a few attempts to obtain the mass function of a few ulxs using emission - line velocity curves . however , the lines were found to vary randomly instead of showing an ellipsoidal modulation ; thus , they did not provide dynamical constraints on the bh masses @xcite . the orbital period is a key parameter for dynamical mass measurement . with current facilities , it may be more feasible to search for orbital periods in x - rays and then confirm them in optical for extragalactic sources , like the cases of m33 x-7 and ic 10 x-1 . we naturally expect ulxs to ionize the surrounding interstellar medium ( see * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ) for the basic principles of x - ray ionization . the main difference between uv ionized h@xmath119ii regions and x - ray ionized nebulae is the lack , in the latter , of a sharp boundary ( strmgren sphere ) between the ionized and neutral plasma @xcite . instead , there is an extended warm region where weakly ionized atoms coexist with collisionally excited neutral species . as a result , an x - ray ionized nebula is characterized by high - ionization emission lines such as he@xmath119ii @xmath2334686 and [ o@xmath119iv ] at 25.89 @xmath234 m in the inner regions , and low - ionization forbidden lines such as [ o@xmath119i ] @xmath2336300 in the outer regions . in particular , he@xmath119ii @xmath2334686 acts as a photon counter of the ionizing flux between 54 ev and @xmath235 ev @xcite . by comparing the true source flux inferred from the he@xmath119ii @xmath2334686 line with the apparent flux measured at energies @xmath236 ev with _ chandra _ or _ xmm - newton _ , we can test whether the x - ray emission is isotropic or beamed . the n159f nebula , powered by the smbh lmc x-1 , is the best - known example of a large - scale ( @xmath0 pc ) x - ray ionized nebula in galactic systems @xcite . @xcite opened a new field with their systematic search for similar nebulae around ulxs . they found a spectacular case around the ulx in m81 group dwarf galaxy holmberg ii . the holmberg ii x-1 ionized nebula ( now known as `` foot nebula '' ) has a he@xmath119ii @xmath2334686 luminosity @xmath237@xmath238 erg s@xmath12 @xcite , 30 times higher than the lmc x-1 nebula , which implies an average in the nebula , estimated as @xmath239 yr @xcite . ] ionizing x - ray flux @xmath240@xmath241 erg s@xmath12 . this result has been confirmed by further optical / infrared spectroscopic studies @xcite . on the other hand , the apparent x - ray luminosity of holmberg ii x-1 has been seen to vary over the years between @xmath17 a few @xmath16 erg s@xmath12 and @xmath242 erg s@xmath12 @xcite . the consistency between the two independent measurements gives the strongest evidence to date that beaming is negligible ( @xmath243 ) for this ulx ; this favors models with relatively large bh masses ( section [ sec : bh ] ) . similar arguments have also been applied to the photoionization - dominated nebula around ngc 5408 x-1 . from the flux in high - ionization lines such as he@xmath119ii @xmath2334686 and [ ne@xmath119v ] @xmath2333426 , @xcite inferred a lower limit on the isotropic x - ray luminosity @xmath244 erg s@xmath12 , only a factor of 3 lower than the directly measured x - ray luminosity . as in holmberg ii x-1 , this suggests that beaming factor is @xmath245 . more examples of x - ray ionized nebulae in ulxs are reported by @xcite , @xcite , and @xcite , although in those cases the interpretation is more model dependent , because the observed line spectra are a mix of photo - ionized and shock - ionized plasma emission . + + it is often hard to distinguish between x - ray photoionization and shock excitation , for ulx nebulae just as it is generally difficult to separate the contribution of a starburst nucleus and/or a low - luminosity agn in a liner . diagnostic diagrams with several line ratios are computed with shock and photoionization codes such as mappings iii @xcite and cloudy @xcite . shock - ionized plasma is characterized by high ratios of low - excitation lines such as [ o@xmath119i ] @xmath246 [ s@xmath119ii ] @xmath247,@xmath248 and [ n@xmath119ii ] @xmath249,@xmath250 over h@xmath118 . for shock velocities @xmath251@xmath252 km s@xmath12 , the high - ionization , forbidden transitions [ o@xmath119iii ] @xmath253,@xmath254 are strong ( [ o@xmath119iii ] @xmath233 5007/h@xmath255 for @xmath256 km s@xmath12 ) , while he@xmath119ii @xmath2334686 indicates @xmath257 km s@xmath12 @xcite . the luminosity in the h@xmath258 line is only a function of the total shock power @xmath259 and shock velocity @xcite ; for typical speeds @xmath260@xmath261 km s@xmath12 , @xmath262@xmath263 . supershells were first found around ngc 6946 mf 16 @xcite and holmberg ix x-1 @xcite , and were initially speculated to be powered by unusually energetic sn remnants . the x - ray emission could not be from the nebulae , because of its variability @xcite . following the pioneering work of @xcite , several more huge shock - ionized nebulae have been identified around ulxs ( `` ulx bubbles '' , see figure [ fig : bubble ] for examples ) , with characteristic diameter @xmath264@xmath265 pc , expansion velocity @xmath260@xmath266 km s@xmath12 , characteristic age @xmath267@xmath206 myr , mechanical power @xmath268@xmath19 erg s@xmath12 ( independently determined from the bubble expansion speed and from the h@xmath258 luminosity ; @xcite ) and energy content @xmath269 erg @xcite . the two best - studied examples are the bubbles around ngc 1313 x-2 and holmberg ix x-1 @xcite . ulx bubbles resemble ordinary sn remnants , but are an order of magnitude larger and 10 to 100 times more luminous . they can not come from ( hypothetical ) single hypernova explosions : first , because the surrounding stellar populations are already too old ( typically @xmath270 yr ) and without o stars ; secondly , because it is unlikely that a lower - mass binary companion that survived the hypothetical hypernova explosion could evolve to fill its roche lobe and feed the ulx already within @xmath271 myr @xcite . invoking 10 to 100 ordinary sn explosions over the last 1 myr would require a massive star cluster with @xmath272 a few @xmath273 ( _ e.g. _ , from starburst99 ; @xcite ) . however , none of those ulxs is associated with a massive star cluster : at most , they are inside ordinary ob associations with age @xmath0@xmath108 myr and total stellar mass @xmath92 . the only plausible conclusion is that ulx bubbles are inflated by a continuous jet or outflow from the ulx , with a power comparable to the radiative output @xcite . jet - inflated bubbles around accreting bhs are found in our galaxy , too . the best - known example is the w50 nebula around ss433 @xcite : a spherical shell with two lateral extensions , the ears , that are inflated by interaction of the jets with the interstellar medium . the characteristic diameter along the major axis is @xmath152 pc . both the jet power and the radiative luminosity are @xmath13 erg s@xmath12 . indeed , it is suggested that ss433 would appear as a beamed , super - eddington ulx if it was seen face - on @xcite . another local example is the 5-pc bubble inflated by the smbh cygnus x-1 @xcite : the shock velocity determined from optical emission line ratios is @xmath260@xmath274 km s@xmath12 ; the required jet power @xmath275 erg s@xmath12 is @xmath276@xmath206 times the x - ray luminosity . the ulx bubbles discovered so far have a quasi - spherical appearance , with no direct signature of relativistic , collimated jets ( as in the galactic source ss433 ) . the first extra - galactic super - bubble with collimated jets was recently found in the outskirts of the spiral galaxy ngc7793 @xcite . this source ( figure [ fig : bubble ] ) , known as s26 , has : x - ray and optical hot spots where the jet and counter - jet interact with the interstellar medium ; an optical nebula with a size of @xmath277 pc , expanding at @xmath278 km s@xmath12 ; an associated x - ray and radio nebula with bright radio lobes . the long - term - average jet power @xmath17 a few @xmath19 erg s@xmath12 @xcite , over a characteristic age @xmath279 yrs . the x - ray luminosity of the central bh is only @xmath280 erg s@xmath12 . this might be because the bh emission is highly obscured and we only see a scattered component ; or because it is beamed away from us ; or because the bh is a transient , currently in a radiative - faint state , but may appear as a ulx at other times . whatever the reason for the current radiative dimness , it is important to note that ngc7793 s26 has had collimated jets with a long - term average power at least of order of the eddington power ( and probably much greater ) of a stellar bh ( smbh or msbh ) . in other words , it is a jet - dominated system at super - eddington mass accretion rates . there is no physical principle that prevents mechanical power to exceed the eddington luminosity . however , the fact that it is collimated in a large - scale jet may be surprising . the canonical view @xcite of bh accretion states based mostly on the behavior of galactic transients is that collimated , steady jets are found at @xmath281 , when accretion is radiatively inefficient ( low / hard state ) . whether and how steady , collimated jets can be launched during super - eddington accretion phases remains an unsolved theoretical problem . a possible solution comes from the radiation - magnetohydrodynamic simulations of @xcite , who find that a jet can be accelerated up to mildly relativistic speed by radiation pressure , and collimated by the lorentz force of a magnetic tower made of wound - up toroidal magnetic field lines . the magnetic structure is itself kept collimated by the geometrically thick accretion flow that dominates in the innermost region when @xmath282 . an ultrapowerful ( rather than ultraluminous ) system such as ngc7793 s26 is the local - universe analog of a recently discovered class of quasars , dominated by mechanical power @xcite . in those quasars , the jet power is up to 25 times higher than the bolometric radiative luminosity ; in some of those systems , the jet power is near or above the eddington power . mechanically - dominated , radiatively inefficient quasars in the early universe may grow much faster than eddington - limited sources , and would provide strong mechanical rather than radiative feedback onto the surrounding gas . thus , understanding the inflow / outflow / radiation processes in ulxs has wider astrophysical relevance . moreover , radiative and mechanical feedback from hmxbs and ulxs themselves may have been an additional , important source of heating and reionization of the intergalactic medium at high redshifts @xcite . some ulx bubbles ( from both the photoionized and shock - ionized variety ) are associated to extended radio emission . the best - studied examples are holmberg ii x-1 @xcite and ngc5408 x-1 @xcite . both radio nebulae are dominated by optically thin synchrotron emission , somewhat similar but much larger ( @xmath283 pc and @xmath284 pc , respectively ) and more luminous than typical radio sn remnants . they are also an order of magnitude more luminous than the radio nebula around ss433 @xcite , which well matches the relative values of radiative and mechanical core power in those sources . the total power carried by synchrotron - emitting electrons has been estimated to be between @xmath17 a few @xmath285 erg s@xmath12 and @xmath286 erg s@xmath12 , depending on the very uncertain lower - energy cut - off of the distribution . in any case , both nebulae are much more energetic than w50 around ss433 ( @xmath17 a few @xmath287 erg s@xmath12 : @xcite ) or than the extended lobes of typical galactic microquasars such as grs1758@xmath93258 ( @xmath288 erg s@xmath12 ; @xcite ) . ngc7793 s26 also has a large radio nebula @xcite , interpreted as a combination of flat - spectrum free - free emission ( mostly in the central region ) and steep - spectrum synchrotron emission from the radio hot spots and lobes . the energy stored in relativistic electrons is @xmath17 a few @xmath289 erg s@xmath12 . the energy content in relativistic electrons for typical ulx nebulae is only @xmath290@xmath291 of the core power in particular , of the mechanical power when it can be reliably estimated from bubble size or optical line fluxes integrated over the characteristic age of the bubble . the main reason is that most of the input energy is transferred to non - relativistic electrons , protons and nuclei @xcite . the fraction of energy in non - radiating particles to that in relativistic electrons in a system such as ngc7793 s26 is similar to the values found by @xcite for a sample of agn , seyfert and giant elliptical galaxies . for the same jet power , agn , ulxs and galactic microquasars may be radio louder or radio quieter depending on the amount of plasma entrained by the jets . we speculate that an interesting test may come from comparisons of the radio loudness and lobe energy in low / hard state microquasars , probably dominated by magnetically accelerated jets @xcite , and in ulxs , possibly dominated by radiation - pressure accelerated jets / outflows @xcite , with more entrainment . there is no doubt that our understanding of the phenomenology of ulxs has greatly advanced in the past decade thanks to _ chandra _ , _ xmm - newton _ , and many other space- and ground - based facilities . however , the key physical issue is still unresolved : that is , whether they are powered by imbhs or normal stellar bhs . a few sources have emerged as strong imbh candidates : in particular , eso243@xmath9349 hlx-1 and m82 x-1 . on the other hand , for the majority of ulxs , there is no strong theoretical need nor compelling observational evidence for imbhs . in the absence of direct mass - function measurements from phase - resolved optical spectroscopy , we still have to rely on x - ray spectral and timing modeling and other indirect clues . reviewing the results that we have collected here , we suggest the following conservative statement : _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ulxs are a diverse population ; msbhs with moderate super - eddington accretion seem to be the easiest solution to account for most sources up to luminosities @xmath17 a few @xmath19 erg s@xmath12 ; strong beaming ( @xmath292 ) can be ruled out for the majority of ulxs ; imbhs are preferred in a few exceptional cases . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ some of the following kinds of observations may provide further breakthroughs : a. measurements of the fast timing behavior down to a time scale of sub - seconds may probe the inner part of the inflow : ideally , we would search for possible high frequency features ( breaks and qpos ) that are found in galactic bhs at frequencies @xmath82 hz . this would require a new generation of x - ray telescopes with large effective area . b. determining the relative contribution of thermal emission and comptonization component is a key test for competing accretion models . for that , multilayer - coated x - ray telescopes with good sensitivity up to a few tens of kev are needed . c. detection of , or a more solid upper limit to broad iron k lines may constrain the properties of the inner disk . d. high - resolution x - ray spectroscopy with gratings or microcalorimeters may constrain the metal abundance and ionization state of the inflow , the mass and energy of the outflow , and probe the absorption from the surrounding interstellar medium . e. the ulx sample within @xmath293 mpc is almost complete , and it does not contain enough sources to permit statistical studies of the luminosity distribution above @xmath294 a few @xmath58 erg s@xmath12 . a homogeneous all - sky survey , complete for ulxs up to @xmath212 mpc would allow us to determine whether or not the luminosity distribution extends unbroken up to at least @xmath18 erg s@xmath12 . such survey will hopefully be successfully conducted by _ erosita _ ; f. repeated snapshot monitoring of nearby ulxs over the next few years will extend their long - term lightcurves enough to prove that their duty cycles and transient behavior are different from those of galactic bhs . this can be easily done with smaller x - ray missions ; g. phase - resolved spectroscopy would lead to the measurement of radial velocity curves and mass functions . attempts to do so with 8-m class telescopes have so far been inconclusive but have suggested that it will be easily done with future 30-m class telescopes ; h. integral - field spectroscopic studies of star forming galaxies , as well as low - frequency radio studies , may reveal fainter , older ulx bubbles or lobes , still expanding into the interstellar medium but no longer energized by a central source . this would constrain the duration of the ulx active phase ; i. searching for compact radio jets down to a sensitivity of @xmath295jy will constrain the bh mass , in relation to other classes of accreting bhs in the fundamental plane . this may be done in the near future with the _ evla _ and with _ ska _ pathfinders , and in the more distant future with the ska itself . in conclusion , we gather from this list that there is more than one way to skin a cat . many fundamental aspects of ulx physics will be understood with instruments already planned or under construction . thus , we anticipate a fruitful decade of ulx studies beyond the _ chandra _ and _ xmm - newton _ era . we thank andy fabian , sean farrell , luigi foschini , fabien gris , phil kaaret , kip kuntz , manfred pakull , tim roberts , mat servillat , tod strohmayer , doug swartz , dany vanbeveren , and luca zampieri for helpful discussions and comments . hf acknowledges funding support from the national natural science foundation of china under grant no . 10903004 and 10978001 , the 973 program of china under grant 2009cb824800 , the foundation for the author of national excellent doctoral dissertation of china under grant 200935 , the tsinghua university initiative scientific research program , and the program for new century excellent talents in university . rs acknowledges support from a curtin university senior research fellowship , and hospitality at the mullard space science laboratory , tsinghua university and the university of sydney during part of this work . , f. , pakull , m. w. , soria , r. , & motch , c. 2009 , in american institute of physics conference series , vol . 1126 , american institute of physics conference series , ed . j. rodriguez & p. ferrando , 201203 , m. w. , & gris , f. 2008 , in american institute of physics conference series , vol . 1010 , a population explosion : the nature & evolution of x - ray binaries in diverse environments , ed . r. m. bandyopadhyay , s. wachter , d. gelino , & c. r. gelino , 303307 , a. h. , galache , j. , kalogara , v. , linden , t. , kilgard , r. , zezas , a. , wolter , a. , & trinchieri , g. 2010 , in bulletin of the american astronomical society , vol . 36 , american astronomical society meeting abstracts # 215 Abstract:

Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.

Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered . Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video . Paper: x - ray observations of clusters of galaxies show that in the central regions of most clusters the cooling time of the intracluster gas is significantly less than a hubble time ( edge , stewart & fabian 1992 ; white , jones & forman 1997 ; peres 1998 ) . this cooling is thought to lead to a slow net inflow of material towards the cluster centre ; a process known as a cooling flow ( see fabian 1994 for a review ) . x - ray imaging data show that gas typically ` cools out ' throughout the central few tens to hundreds of kpc in clusters , with @xmath2 , where @xmath3 is the integrated mass deposition rate within radius @xmath4 ( thomas , fabian & nulsen 1987 ) . spatially resolved x - ray spectroscopy has confirmed the presence of distributed cooling gas in cooling flows , with a spatial distribution and luminosity in good agreement with the predictions from the imaging data and cooling - flow models ( allen & fabian 1997 ) . for some years , the primary uncertainty with the standard model for cooling flows was the fate of the cooled matter ( see fabian , nulsen & canizares 1991 ) . however , the discovery of large column densities of intrinsic x - ray absorbing material associated with cooling flows observed with the solid state spectrometer ( sss ) on the einstein observatory ( white 1991 ; johnstone 1992 ) opened one interesting possibility . follow - up spatially - resolved x - ray spectroscopy with the position sensitive proportional counter ( pspc ) on rosat ( allen 1993 ; irwin & sarazin 1995 ; allen & fabian 1997 ) confirmed the presence of intrinsic x - ray absorbing material in cooling - flow clusters and further showed this material to be distributed throughout , but centrally - concentrated within , the cooling flows . the x - ray data thus identify the intrinsic x - ray absorbing material as a plausible sink for the cooled gas deposited by the cooling flows . in this paper we examine the x - ray properties of the cooling flows in a sample of 30 of the most x - ray luminous ( @xmath5 ) clusters of galaxies known . using asca spectra and rosat high resolution imager ( hri ) data , we present independent determinations of the mass deposition rates in the cooling flows and measure the column densities of intrinsic x - ray absorbing material associated with these systems . we show that the cooling flow model provides a consistent description of the x - ray imaging and spectral data and that the observed masses of intrinsic x - ray absorbing material are in reasonable agreement with the masses expected to have been accumulated by the cooling flows over their lifetimes . we also discuss the evidence for mass deposition from the cooling flows in other wavebands . this is the final paper in a series that has examined the impact of cooling flows on mass measurements ( allen 1998 ) , the @xmath6 relation ( allen & fabian 1998a ) and metallicity measurements ( allen & fabian 1998b ) for x - ray luminous clusters . in this paper , we describe the data reduction and analysis procedures used in these works . a large number of other , previous studies have also analysed one or more of data sets included here ( see references in the papers listed above ) , although these studies have not , in general , examined the properties of the cooling flows in the clusters . exceptions are the deprojection analysis of peres ( 1998 ) , and the combined asca / rosat studies of allen ( 1996 ) , schindler ( 1997 ) , bhringer ( 1998 ) and rizza ( 1998 ) . the cosmological parameters @xmath7=50 , @xmath8 and @xmath9 are assumed throughout . our sample was identified from clusters contained in the rosat x - ray brightest abell - type cluster sample ( xbacs ; ebeling 1996 ) and rosat brightest cluster sample ( bcs ; ebeling 1998 ) with x - ray luminosities in the @xmath10 kev band exceeding @xmath11 . from this initial list , we selected for study those targets with asca x - ray spectra and rosat high resolution imager ( hri ) data available on the goddard space flight centre ( gsfc ) public archive as of 1997 july 15 . we supplemented this sample with a number of other , southern x - ray luminous clusters , known to exhibit strong gravitational lensing effects ( pks0745 - 191 , rxj1347.5 - 1145 , ms2137.3 - 2353 , ac114 ) and the distant , luminous cooling - flow clusters abell 1068 , 1704 and iras 09104 + 4109 . the primary goal of this project was to investigate the x - ray properties of cooling flows in x - ray luminous clusters and their effects on the integrated x - ray properties of their host systems . we have not included either the perseus ( abell 426 ) or coma ( abell 1656 ) clusters in our study , although these systems met our selection criteria , since both are too close ( @xmath12 and @xmath13 , respectively ) to allow their integrated cluster properties to be studied using the techniques used in this paper . detailed analyses of these clusters and other nearby cooling flows are discussed by allen ( 1999 ) . the clusters abell 370 , 115 and 1758 also met the selection criteria but were not included in our study since rosat hri images show them not be single , coherent structures but to consist of a number of merging subunits . the integrated x - ray spectra for such clusters will relate to the virial properties of the individual subclusters rather than the systems as a whole , and the assumptions of spherical symmetry and hydrostatic equilibrium required by the x - ray modeling will not apply . the x - ray images for the other clusters included in the sample do not exhibit any dramatic substructure that would suggest these assumptions to be invalid . our final sample consists of 30 clusters , spanning the redshift range @xmath14 , with a mean redshift of 0.21 . the asca ( tanaka , inoue & holt 1994 ) observations were made over a three - and - a - half year period between 1993 april and 1996 december . the asca x - ray telescope array ( xrt ) consists of four nested - foil telescopes , each focussed onto one of four detectors ; two x - ray ccd cameras , the solid - state imaging spectrometers ( sis ; s0 and s1 ) , and two gas scintillation imaging spectrometers ( gis ; g2 and g3 ) . the xrt provides a spatial resolution of @xmath15 arcmin half power diameter ( hpd ) in the energy range @xmath16 kev . the sis detectors provide good spectral resolution [ @xmath17 over a @xmath18 arcmin@xmath19 field of view . the gis detectors provide poorer energy resolution [ @xmath20 but cover a larger circular field of view of @xmath21 arcmin diameter . for our analysis we have used the screened event lists from the rev1 processing of the data sets available on the gsfc asca archive ( for a detailed description of the rev1 processing see the gsfc asca data reduction guide , published by gsfc . ) the asca data were reduced using the ftools software ( version 3.6 ) issued by gsfc , from within the xselect environment ( version 1.3 ) . further data - cleaning procedures as recommended in the asca data reduction guide , including appropriate grade selection , gain corrections and manual screening based on the individual instrument light curves , were followed . a summary of the asca observations , including the individual exposure times after all screening procedures were carried out , is provided in table 1 . spectra were extracted from all four asca detectors ( except in those few cases where the s1 data were lost due to saturation problems caused by flickering pixels in the ccds ) . the spectra were extracted from circular regions , centred on the peaks of the x - ray emission . for the sis data , the radii of the regions used were selected to minimize the number of chip boundaries crossed ( thereby minimizing the systematic uncertainties introduced by such crossings ) whilst covering as large a region of the clusters as possible . data from the regions between the chips were masked out and excluded . the final extraction radii for the sis data are summarized in table 2 . also included in that table are the chip modes used in the observations ( whether 1,2 or 4 chip mode ) and the number of chips from which the extracted data were drawn . for the gis data a constant extraction radius of 6 arcmin was used . [ we note that for abell 2142 , the 2 arcmin ( 3 arcmin ) radius region surrounding the x - ray bright seyfert-1 galaxy 1556 + 274 ( offset by @xmath22 arcmin from the x - ray centre of the cluster ) was masked out and excluded from the analysis of the sis ( gis ) data . ] for the gis observations , and sis observations of clusters in regions of low galactic column density ( @xmath23 ) , background subtraction was carried out using the ` blank sky ' observations of high galactic latitude fields compiled during the performance verification stage of the asca mission . for such data sets , the blank - sky observations provide a reasonable representation of the cosmic and instrumental backgrounds in the detectors . the background data were screened and grade selected in the same manner as the target observations and background spectra were extracted from the same regions of the detectors as the cluster spectra . for the sis observations of clusters in directions of higher galactic column density , background spectra were extracted from regions of the chips that were relatively free from foreground cluster emission . for the sis data , response matrices were generated using the ftools sisrmg software . where the spectra covered more than one chip , response matrices were created for each chip , which were then combined to form a counts - weighted mean matrix . for the gis analysis , the response matrices issued by gsfc on 1995 march 6 were used . the rosat hri observations were carried out between 1991 november and 1995 june . the hri provides a @xmath24 arcsec ( fwhm ) x - ray imaging facility covering a @xmath25 arcmin@xmath19 field of view ( david 1996 ) . reduction of the data was carried out with the starlink asterix package . x - ray images were created on a @xmath26 arcsec@xmath19 pixel scale , from which centres for the cluster x - ray emission were determined . where more than one observation of a source was made , a mosaic was constructed from the individual observations . for the cooling flow and intermediate clusters , the x - ray centres were identified from the peaks of the x - ray surface brightness distributions ( which are easily determined from the hri images ) . for the non - cooling flow clusters , the x - ray emission is not as sharply - peaked and for these systems we have identified the x - ray centres with the results from iterative determinations of the centroids within a circular aperture of fixed radius . for abell 665 , 2163 and ac114 a 1 arcminute radius aperture was used . for abell 2744 , 773 , 2218 and 2219 a 2 arcmin aperture was adopted , and for abell 520 a 3 arcmin aperture was used . for two of the clusters included in the sample , abell 665 and 1413 , rosat hri images were not available at the time of writing and for these clusters pspc imaging data have been used instead . a summary of the rosat observations and the x - ray centers for the clusters is given in table 3 . for the purposes of this paper , we have classified the clusters into subsamples of cooling - flow ( hereafter cf ) and non - cooling flow ( ncf ) systems . cfs are those clusters for which the upper ( 90 percentile ) limit to the central cooling time , as determined from the deprojection analysis of the rosat hri x - ray images ( section 4 ) , is less than @xmath27 yr . ( the ` central ' cooling time is the mean cooling time of the cluster gas in the innermost bin included in the deprojection analysis , which is of variable size . the use of a fixed physical size of 100 kpc for the central bin leads to similar results ; section 4 . ) using this simple classification scheme we identify 21 cfs and 9 ncfs in our sample . the mean redshift for the subsamples of both cf and ncf clusters is @xmath28 . the fraction of cfs in our sample is @xmath29 per cent , the same as that determined by peres ( 1998 ) from a study of a larger , flux - limited sample of clusters ( primarily at lower redshift ; @xmath30 ) using a similar classification scheme . the modeling of the x - ray spectra has been carried out using the xspec spectral fitting package ( version 9.0 ; arnaud 1996 ) . for the sis data , only counts in pulse height analyser ( pha ) channels corresponding to energies between 0.6 and 10.0 were included in the analysis ( the energy range over which the calibration of the sis instruments is best - understood ) . for the gis data only counts in the energy range @xmath31 were used . the spectra were grouped before fitting to ensure a minimum of 20 counts per pha channel , allowing @xmath32 statistics to be used . the spectra have been modeled using the plasma codes of kaastra & mewe ( 1993 ; incorporating the fe l calculations of liedahl , osterheld & goldstein 1995 , in xspec version 9.0 ) and the photoelectric absorption models of balucinska - church & mccammon ( 1992 ) . the data from all four asca detectors were analysed simultaneously ( except where the s1 data were lost due to chip saturation problems ) with the fit parameters linked to take the same values across the data sets . the exceptions to this were the emission measures of the ambient cluster gas in the four detectors which , due to the different extraction radii used and residual uncertainties in the flux calibration of the instruments , were allowed to fit independently . the spectra were examined with a series of spectral models . model a , consisted of an isothermal plasma in collisional equilibrium , at the optically - determined redshift for the cluster , and absorbed by the nominal galactic column density ( dickey & lockman 1990 ) . the free parameters in this model were the temperature ( @xmath33 ) and metallicity ( @xmath34 ) of the plasma and the emission measures in the four detectors . ( the metallicities are measured relative to the solar values of anders & grevesse ( 1989 ) , with the different elements assumed to be present in their solar ratios . ) the second model , model b , was the same as model a but with the absorbing column density @xmath35 also included as a free parameter in the fits . the third model , model c , was the same as model a but with an additional component explicitly accounting for the emission from the cooling flows . the material in the cooling flows is assumed to cool at constant pressure from the ambient cluster temperature , following the prescription of johnstone ( 1992 ) . the normalization of the cooling - flow component was parameterized in terms of a mass deposition rate , @xmath36 , which was a free parameter in the fits . the mass deposition rate is linked to take the same value in all four detectors , scaled by a normalization factor proportional to the total flux measured in that detector . the metallicity of the cooling gas was assumed to be equal to that of the ambient icm . the emission from the cooling flows was also assumed to be absorbed by an intrinsic column density , @xmath37 , of cold gas which was a further free parameter in the fits . the abundances of metals in the absorbing material were fixed to their solar values ( anders & grevesse 1989 ) although the effects of varying these values were examined . finally , a fourth spectral model , model d , was examined which was similar to model c but with the constant - pressure cooling flow replaced with a second isothermal emission component . the temperature and normalization of this second emission component were included as free parameters in the fits . ( as with model c , the normalizations were linked to the same value in all four detectors , scaled by the appropriate normalization factors . ) the second emission component was also assumed to be intrinsically absorbed by a column density of cold gas , @xmath37 , which was a free parameter in the fits . the metallicities of the two emission components were linked to take the same values . 1 shows the asca data and best - fitting spectral models for four of the clusters in the sample ; abell 1704 , 2029 , 2204 and 2219 . table 4 summarizes the fit results for all of the clusters using the four spectral models . for each cluster we list the best - fitting parameter values and 90 per cent ( @xmath38 ) confidence limits . the mass deposition rates ( @xmath39 ) , @xmath40 kev x - ray luminosities ( @xmath41 ) and bolometric luminosities ( @xmath42 ) are the values measured in the g3 detector . note that for the clusters at relatively low redshifts ( @xmath43 ) , we have corrected the @xmath41 and @xmath44 values for the emission arising at radii @xmath45 arcmin by scaling from the david ( 1993 ) results , which were based on ginga and einstein mpc observations . table 5 summarizes the goodness - of - fit measurements obtained with the different spectral models . the tabulated results are the probabilities of exceeding the @xmath32 values obtained , assuming in each case that the model correctly describes the spectral properties of the clusters . goodness - of - fit values @xmath46 may be regarded as indicating a formally unacceptable fit to the data . the results from the spectral analysis show that model a ( the isothermal model with the absorbing column density fixed at the nominal galactic value ) provides a reasonable description of most ( 21/30 ) of the clusters . however , model a fails significantly for the massive cf clusters abell 1068 , 1795 , 2029 and 2204 . the significance of the improvements to the fits obtained with spectral model b over model a have been evaluated using the f - test for the introduction of an additional free parameter ( bevington 1969 ) . these significances are listed in column 6 of table 5 . we see that the improvements obtained when including the column density as a free parameter in the fits with the isothermal models are significant at @xmath47 per cent confidence for 23 of the 30 clusters ( and would also be highly significant for abell 478 if the nominal dickey & lockman 1990 value for the galactic column density , rather than the x - ray value determined by allen & fabian 1997 were used in model a ) . model b provides a statistically acceptable fit for 27 of the 30 clusters . the results on the goodness - of - fit determined with spectral models c and d are summarized in columns 4 and 5 of table 5 . the only clusters that these models do not adequately describe are the two nearest , brightest systems ; abell 1795 and abell 2029 . spectral models c and d include an absorption component acting on the entire cluster emission which is normalized to the appropriate galactic column densities determined from hi studies ( dickey & lockman 1990 ) . we have examined the significance of the improvements to the fits obtained when allowing the galactic column density to also be a free parameter in the fits with these models . the fits were not significantly improved for any of the clusters except pks0745 - 191 , for which the galactic column density is most uncertain . ( the galactic column density to pks0745 - 191 varies between 3.2 and @xmath48 in the surrounding regions studied by dickey & lockman 1990 ) . we find @xmath49 with model c and @xmath50 with model d for pks0745 - 191 ( indicating improvements significant at @xmath51 per cent confidence ) when allowing the galactic column density to be free . the preferred value for the galactic column density for this cluster from the asca data is @xmath52 . for abell 1795 , we also find a marginal improvement to the fits with models c and d when allowing the galactic column density to be a free parameter ( @xmath53 with model c and @xmath54 for model d , which is significant at the 96.5 and 98 per cent level , respectively ) with a preferred value of @xmath55 . the agreement between the galactic column densities inferred from the 21 cm and x - ray data for most of the clusters with spectral models c and d provides further support for the validity of these models . the statistical improvements obtained by introducing an additional emission component into the fits with the single - temperature model ( model b ) are summarized in columns 7 and 8 of table 5 . we list the results obtained for both cases , where the extra emission component is modeled as a cooling flow ( for the cf systems only ) or a second isothermal emission component . ( essentially we use spectral models c and d , but also include the galactic column density as a free parameter it the fits so as to permit a direct comparison with the goodness of fit measured with spectral model b ) . the significance of the improvements to the fits obtained with the multiphase models with respect to model b have been quantified using an f - test for the introduction of 2 or 3 extra parameters ( for models c and d respectively ) . we find that the improvements with model d are significant at @xmath47 per cent confidence for 21 of the 30 clusters . the only clusters for which we find no significant improvement with the introduction of a second emission component are the ncf clusters abell 520 , 773 , 2218 and ac114 , and the more distant and/or less - luminous cf clusters abell 963 , ms1358.4 + 6245 , ms1455.0 + 2232 , ms2137.3 - 2353 and abell 2390 , which have amongst the lowest numbers of counts in their asca spectra . for the cf clusters ( the only clusters to which model c was applied ) the improvements obtained with the cooling - flow model over model b are significant at @xmath47 per cent confidence in 13 of 21 systems , with again those cf clusters with the lowest numbers of total counts in their asca spectra exhibiting the least - significant improvements . we thus find that most cf clusters , and a number of ncf systems ( in general those systems with the best signal - to - noise ratios in their asca spectra ) exhibit significant improvements to their fits with the use of multiphase , over single - phase , models . these improvements generally indicate the presence of emission from material cooler than the mean cluster temperatures ( see table 4 ) . for the cf clusters , this can be naturally understood as being due to emission associated with the cooling flows . for the ncf clusters , the improvements to the fits obtained with model d are likely to reflect the presence of merging subclusters with lower virial temperatures this is supported by optical , radio and x - ray imaging ( edge 1992 ; buote & tsai 1996 ; markevitch 1996 ; feretti , giovannini & bhringer 1997 ; rizza 1998 ) and gravitational lensing studies ( kneib 1995 ; smail 1995 , 1997 ; squires 1997 ; allen 1998 ) of the ncf clusters , which show that these systems typically exhibit complex morphologies and centroid shifts indicative of merger events . the results in table 4 show that spectral model d typically provides at least as good a fit to the asca spectra for the cf clusters as the cooling - flow model ( model c ) . this has sometimes been taken to indicate that the x - ray gas in these systems is distinctly two - phase , with the cooler phase being due to the dominant cluster galaxy ( makishima 1997 ; ikebe 1999 ) . however , when interpreting these results it is important to recall that the two - temperature model provides a more flexible fitting parameterization , with an extra degree of freedom , when applied to asca observations . simulated cooling - flow spectra constructed with spectral model c , including plausible levels of intrinsic absorption ( section 6 ) and observed at the spectral resolution and signal - to - noise levels typical of asca observations , are invariably well - described by two - temperature models . this is illustrated in fig . 2 where we show a simulated asca sis spectrum for a 7 kev cluster with a metallicity of 0.4@xmath56 , containing a cooling flow ( intrinsically absorbed by a column density of @xmath57 ) accounting for 30 per cent of the total @xmath40 kev flux . a count rate of 1ct s@xmath58 , an exposure time of 40ks and a galactic column density of @xmath0 have been assumed . overlaid , we show the best - fitting two - temperature model , which provides a good fit to the simulated data . thus , even in the case where the constant - pressure cooling flow model provides an exact description of the data ( _ i.e. _ in the simulations ) , the two - temperature model provides a similarly good fit . in a real cluster , where spectral model c will undoubtedly over - simplify the true situation , the more flexible two - temperature model ( model d ) is likely to provide a better match to the observations . thus , our finding that spectral model d often provides a better fit to the observed cluster spectra than model c , only shows that the constant pressure cooling flow model over - simplifies the true spectra of the cooling flows in the clusters ( see also section 6.4 ) . we note that such tendencies would be enhanced by the presence of additional cool components in the spectra , for example due to temperature gradients at large radii ( markevitch 1998 ) . finally , we note that the very high luminosities associated with the cool emission components in clusters like rxj1347.5 - 1145 ( with @xmath59 a few @xmath11 ) are difficult to explain with models in which the cool emission is due to the interstellar medium of the central cluster galaxies . the analysis of the hri imaging data has been carried out using an extensively updated version of the deprojection code of fabian ( 1981 ) . azimuthally - averaged x - ray surface brightness profiles were determined for each cluster from the hri images . these profiles were background - subtracted , corrected for telescope vignetting and re - binned to provide sufficient counts in each annulus to allow the analysis to be extended to radii of at least 500 kpc . ( bin sizes of 8 - 24 arcsec were used . ) with the x - ray surface brightness profiles as the primary input , and under assumptions of spherical symmetry and hydrostatic equilibrium , the deprojection technique can be used to study the basic properties of the intracluster gas ( temperature , density , pressure , cooling rate ) as a function of radius . the deprojection code uses a monte - carlo method to determine the statistical uncertainties on the results and incorporates the appropriate hri spectral response matrix issued by gsfc . the cluster metallicities were fixed at the values determined from the spectral analysis ( table 4 ) . the absorbing column densities were fixed at the appropriate galactic values ( table 1 ) . the deprojection code requires the total mass profiles for the clusters ( which define the pressure profiles ) to be specified . we have iteratively determined the mass profiles that result in deprojected temperature profiles ( which approximate the mass - weighted temperature profiles in the clusters ) that are isothermal within the regions probed by the hri data ( the central @xmath60 mpc ) and which are consistent with the spectrally - determined temperatures ( section 3 ) . the assumption of approximately isothermal mass - weighted temperature profiles in the central regions of the clusters is supported by the following evidence : firstly , asca observations of nearby cooling flows show that in the central regions of these systems the gas is multiphase , but that the bulk of the x - ray gas there has a temperature close to the cluster mean ( fabian 1994b ; fukazawa 1994 ; matsumoto 1996 ; ikebe 1999 ) . secondly , combined x - ray and gravitational lensing studies of cf clusters ( allen 1998 ) show that approximately isothermal mass - weighted temperature profiles in the cores of such clusters lead to excellent agreement between their x - ray and gravitational - lensing masses . thirdly , the use of approximately constant mass - weighted temperature profiles implies a more plausible range of initial density inhomogeneities in the clusters than would be the case if the temperature profiles decreased within their cores ( thomas , fabian & nulsen 1987 ) . finally , the use of approximately isothermal mass - weighted temperature profiles in the deprojection analyses leads to independent determinations of the mass deposition profiles in the cooling flows , from the x - ray spectra and imaging data , in excellent agreement with each other ( allen & fabian 1997 ) . we note that the assumption of a constant mass - weighted deprojected temperature profile is consistent with measurements of a decreasing emission - weighted temperatures in the cores of many cf clusters ( waxman & miralda - escud 1995 ) . the mass profiles for the clusters were parameterized as isothermal spheres ( equation 4 - 125 of binney & tremaine 1987 ) with adjustable core radii ( @xmath61 ) and velocity dispersions ( @xmath62 ) . the core radii were adjusted until the temperature profiles determined from the deprojection code became isothermal . the velocity dispersions were then adjusted until the temperatures determined from the deprojection code came into agreement with the spectrally - determined values . errors on the velocity dispersions are the range of values that result in isothermal deprojected temperature profiles that are consistent , at the 90 per cent confidence limit , with the spectrally - determined temperature results . estimates of the thermal gas pressure in the outermost radial bins used in the analysis are also required by the deprojection code and were determined iteratively . ( the uncertainties on the outer pressure estimates do not significantly affect the results presented here . ) although the deprojection method of fabian ( 1981 ) is essentially a single - phase technique , we note that it produces results in good agreement with more detailed multiphase treatments ( thomas , fabian & nulsen 1987 ) and , due to its simple applicability at large radii in clusters , is better - suited to the present project . the mass distributions determined from the deprojection analysis are summarized in columns 3 and 4 of table 6 . these simple parameterizations permit direct comparisons with independent mass constraints from gravitational lensing and dynamical studies ( allen 1998 ) . we note that for a few of the clusters ( primarily the brightest cfs with the best data ) the single - component mass models can not adequately satisfy the requirement for approximately isothermal deprojected temperatures profiles and for these systems a significantly better match was obtained by introducing a second ` linear ' mass component , truncated at a specified outer radius . the clusters requiring the additional mass components were abell 586 ( @xmath63 kpc@xmath58 within the central 20 kpc ) , abell 2029 ( @xmath64 kpc@xmath58 within the central 20 kpc ) , abell 2219 ( @xmath65 kpc@xmath58 within the central 30 kpc ) , abell 478 ( @xmath66 kpc@xmath58 within the central 20 kpc and an adjustment of the cluster parameters to @xmath67 and @xmath68 kpc ) and abell 1795 ( @xmath65 kpc@xmath58 within the central 20 kpc , and an adjustment of the cluster parameters to @xmath69 and @xmath70 kpc ) . the core radii of the mass distributions determined from the deprojection analysis are similar to the values measured from simple ` @xmath71model ' fits to the x - ray surface brightness profiles ( cavaliere & fusco - femiano 1976 , 1978 ) . it is well known that the @xmath72-model does not provide a good match to the x - ray surface brightness profiles of the brightest cf clusters when their central regions are included in the analysis ( jones & forman 1984 ) . however , where @xmath72-models are used to estimate the mass core radii in cf clusters , the central regions of these clusters should not simply be excised from the fits . the central surface brightness peaks in cf clusters trace the presence of sharp central density rises in these systems and are not only the result of excess emission due to cooling gas . ( it is the high central densities that lead to the high cooling rates . ) although fully accounting for the effects of cooling on the central density measurements is difficult with current data , simply excising the inner regions of the clusters can lead to overestimates of the mass core radii and corresponding underestimates of the central gas and total mass densities . the basic results on the cooling flows from the deprojection analysis are summarized in columns @xmath73 of table 6 . for those clusters in common , the results obtained are generally in good agreement with values reported from previous works ( edge 1992 , white 1997 ; peres 1998 ) . the spectral and image deprojection analyses discussed in sections 3 and 4 provide essentially independent estimates of the mass deposition rates in the clusters . a comparison of the results obtained from these analyses therefore provides a test of the validity of the cooling flow model . the deprojection method describes the x - ray emission from a cluster as arising from a series of concentric spherical shells . the luminosity in a particular shell , @xmath74 , may be written as the sum of four components ( arnaud 1988 ) . @xmath75 , \label{swa_eq1}\ ] ] where @xmath76 is the mass deposited in shell @xmath74 , @xmath77 is the enthalpy of the gas in shell @xmath74 , and @xmath78 is the gravitational energy released in crossing that shell . @xmath79 is the mass flow rate through shell @xmath74 , and @xmath80 the change of enthalpy of the gas as it moves through that shell . the first term in equation [ swa_eq1 ] thus accounts for the enthalpy of the gas deposited in shell @xmath74 . the second term is the gravitational work done on the gas deposited in shell @xmath74 . the third and fourth terms respectively account for the gravitational work done on material flowing through shell @xmath74 to interior radii , and the enthalpy released by that material as it passes through the shell . in any particular shell , the densest material in the cooling flow is assumed to cool out and be deposited . since the cooling time of this material will be short compared to the flow time , the cooling can be assumed to take place at a fixed radius . thus , the luminosity contributed by the first term in equation 1 should have a spectrum that can be approximated by gas cooling at constant pressure from the ambient cluster temperature the same spectrum as the cooling component incorporated into the spectral analysis with model c ( section 3 ) . for the bulk of the material continuing to flow inwards towards the cluster centre , the cooling via x - ray emission is assumed to be offset by the gravitational work done on the gas as it moves inwards . the emission accounted for in the second and third terms of equation 1 should therefore have a spectrum that can be approximated by an isothermal plasma at the appropriate ambient temperature for the cluster the spectrum of the isothermal emission component in model c. since the mass - weighted temperature profiles in the clusters are assumed to remain approximately isothermal with radius , the luminosity contributed by the fourth term of equation [ swa_eq1 ] should be negligible . the mass deposition rates , @xmath81 , listed in table 6 are the mass flow rates ( @xmath82 ) determined from the deprojection analysis , at the point where the mean cooling time of the cluster gas first exceeds the hubble time ( @xmath83 yr ) . thus , if the cooling flow model is correct , and the cooling flows have been undisturbed for a significant fraction of a hubble time , the mass deposition rates determined from the deprojection analysis should be similar to those measured independently from the spectral data . 3 shows the mass deposition rates determined from the spectral analysis ( @xmath39 ) versus the image deprojection results ( @xmath81 ) , for those clusters for which both quantities have been measured . we see that the results exhibit an approximately linear correlation ; a fit to the data with a power - law model of the form @xmath84 , using the akritas & bershady ( 1996 ) bisector modification of the ordinary least - squares statistic , gives a best - fitting power - law slope of @xmath85 ( where the error is the standard deviation determined by bootstrap re - sampling ) , although the spectrally - determined mass deposition rates typically exceed the deprojection results by a factor of @xmath86 . however , the spectral analysis presented in section 3 also requires that the cooling gas is intrinsically absorbed by equivalent hydrogen column densities of , typically , a few @xmath1 ( model c ) . the mass deposition rates determined from the deprojection analysis must therefore also be corrected for the effects of this absorbing material . the corrections for the effects of intrinsic absorption on the deprojection results have been carried out by re - running the deprojection analysis with the absorbing column densities set to the total values determined with spectral model c. we assume that the absorption is due to cold gas with solar metallicity . if , however , the intrinsic absorption were instead due to dust , a possibility examined in more detail in section 7 , then the required correction factors would likely be reduced by a few tens of per cent . ( the introduction of a simple oik absorption edge at @xmath87kev , such as might be associated with oxygen - rich , silicate dust grains , generally provides as good a description of the intrinsic absorption detected in the @xmath88kev asca spectra as a cold , gaseous absorber . ) since the intrinsic column densities measured with model c are redshifted quantities , we set the total column densities used in the revised deprojection analysis , which assumes zero redshift for the absorber , to be @xmath89 , where @xmath90 is the galactic column density ) . the absorption - corrected mass deposition rates ( @xmath91 ) so determined are summarized in table 7 . 4 compares the spectrally - determined mass deposition rates with the absorption - corrected deprojected values . we see that once the presence of intrinsic absorption has been accounted for in a consistent manner in the imaging and spectral analyses , the results on the mass deposition rates in the clusters show good agreement . table 8 lists the fractions of the total @xmath40 kev x - ray fluxes from the cf clusters associated with cooling gas , as determined with spectral model c. the results range from @xmath92 per cent for systems like abell 1689 and 2142 to @xmath93 per cent for zwicky 3146 , abell 1068 , rxj1347 - 1145 and abell 2204 . such a range of measurements is consistent with the results of peres ( 1998 ) , from a deprojection analysis of a flux - limited sample of the brightest clusters known . the fraction of the x - ray flux from a cluster due to it s cooling flow can be expected to increase with the age of the flow . it is therefore likely that the cooling flows in abell 1689 and 2142 are younger than those in abell 2204 and zwicky 3146 . we note that the x - ray data are not , in general , of sufficient quality to place firm constraints on the ages of the cooling flows in these clusters ( for a discussion of cooling flow age measurements see allen 1999 ) . it is interesting that the clusters with the largest cooling - flow flux fractions ( with the exception of abell 1413 and 2261 ) are also amongst the most optically line - luminous cooling flows known ( crawford 1999 ) . the production of powerful optical emission lines and associated uv / blue continuum emission is known to be due , at least in part , to the formation of massive stars at the centres of cooling flows ( johnstone , fabian & nulsen 1987 ; allen 1995 ; cardiel 1995 , 1998 ; mcnamara 1996 ; voit & donahue 1997 ) . the results presented here are consistent with the idea that such star formation is typical of undisturbed cooling flows . it is also interesting to note that the clusters with the largest cooling flow flux fractions and most optically line - luminous emission line nebulae also tend to have the shortest cooling times averaged over their central 100 kpc regions , with @xmath94gyr ( see also peres 1998 ) . the equivalent column densities of intrinsic x - ray absorbing material inferred from the spectral analysis are summarized in table 9 . all three of the spectral models incorporating a free - fitting absorption component ( models b , c , d ) reveal the presence of excess x - ray absorption over and above the nominal galactic values along the lines of sight to the clusters ( dickey & lockman 1990 ) , although the measured column densities are sensitive to the spectral model used . using the simple isothermal model with free - fitting absorption ( model b ) , we determine a mean excess column density for the whole sample of 30 clusters of @xmath95 . when we examine the cf and ncf clusters separately , we find that both subsamples exhibit intrinsic absorption , at a similar level on average . for the cf clusters , the mean excess column density measured with spectral model b is @xmath96 . for the ncf systems , the value is @xmath97 . the application of a students t - test ( accounting for the possibility of unequal variances in the two distributions ; press 1992 ) shows the mean excess column densities for the cf and ncf clusters , determined with spectral model b , to differ at only the 45 per cent confidence level . the application of a kolmogorov - smirnov test shows the two subsamples to be drawn from different parent populations at only the @xmath92 per cent confidence level . thus , our analysis with spectral model b suggests that intrinsic absorption is not confined to cf clusters . the results on the column densities are quite different , however , when the more - sophisticated multiphase spectral models are used . as discussed in section 3 , the multiphase models generally provide a better description of the x - ray properties of the cf clusters ( and some of the brighter ncf systems ) . using spectral model c , our preferred model for the cf clusters in that it provides a consistent description of the spectral and imaging x - ray data for these systems ( section 5.1 ) , we determine a mean intrinsic column density acting on the cooling - flow components of @xmath98 . using the two - temperature spectral model ( model d ) , we determine a mean intrinsic column density acting on the cooler emission components in the cf systems of @xmath99 . thus , the intrinsic column densities for the cf clusters measured with the multiphase models ( models c and d ) are similar and approximately an order of magnitude larger than the values inferred using the single - phase model b. these results demonstrate the need for adopting an appropriate spectral when attempting to measure the column densities of absorbing material in cf clusters . we also note that where spectral model d provided a significant improvement to the fits to the ncf clusters , with respect to model b , the measured column densities acting on the cooler emission components were also significantly larger than the values determined using the single - phase models . we have also measured the intrinsic column densities in the cf clusters using one further spectral model , referred to in table 9 as model c. model c is identical to model c except that it assumes that the excess absorption acts on the entire cluster spectrum , rather than just the cooling gas , and that the absorbing material lies at zero redshift . model c has been used in a number of previous studies and is included here for comparison purposes . the mean excess column density for the cf clusters determined with spectral model c is @xmath100 . allen & fabian ( 1997 ) present results from an x - ray colour deprojection study of 18 clusters observed with the rosat pspc . these authors determine intrinsic column densities across the central 30 arcsec ( radius ) regions of abell 478 , 1795 and 2029 , using spectral model c , of @xmath101 , @xmath102 and @xmath103 , respectively . the results for abell 478 and abell 1795 are in excellent agreement with those presented here , although the allen & fabian ( 1997 ) value for abell 2029 is @xmath22 times smaller than our result . abell 2029 is unusual in that it hosts a strong cooling flow without associated optical line emission . this may indicate that the central regions of the cluster have been disrupted ( perhaps by a minor merger event or the strong central radio source in this system ) , complicating the distributions of cooling and absorbing material ( _ cf . _ section 5.2 ) . four of the cf clusters studied here were also examined by white ( 1991 ) , using einstein observatory sss data . these authors measured intrinsic column densities for abell 478 , 1795 , 2029 and 2142 ( in a 3 arcmin radius circular aperture , using spectral model c ) of @xmath104 , @xmath105 , @xmath106 and @xmath107 , respectively . ( the sss result for abell 478 has been corrected to account for the different value of galactic absorption assumed in that study ) . the intrinsic column densities determined by white ( 1991 ) are @xmath108 times larger than the values measured from the asca data . allen & fabian ( 1997 ) compared the results from their x - ray colour deprojection study of pspc data with the white ( 1991 ) sss analysis and concluded that if the intrinsic absorption were due to cold gas , then agreement between the measured column densities could only be obtained if the covering fraction of the x - ray absorbing material were , in general , @xmath109 . we have therefore examined the constraints on the covering fraction , @xmath110 , that can be obtained from the asca data using spectral model c. the results are also listed in table 9 . in all cases we determine a best - fit covering fraction for the intrinsic x - ray absorbing material of unity . for many clusters , covering fractions of @xmath111 per cent can be firmly ruled out . ( the physical significance of these results are further explored in section 6.4 ) . the results on the covering fractions , and the reasonable agreement of the asca and pspc results for abell 478 and 1795 , suggest that the white ( 1991 ) results may have systematically over - estimated the intrinsic column densities in clusters by a factor of a few . before considering in more detail the possible origin and nature of the absorbing material , it is pertinent to consider whether the intrinsic absorption , inferred to be present using a variety of spectral models , could in fact be an artifact due to an unconsidered emission process in the clusters . 5 shows the sis0 spectra for abell 1068 and 1795 , which exhibit two of the clearest absorption signatures . the data between @xmath112 and @xmath113 kev have been fitted with a single - temperature emission model with galactic absorption ( _ i.e. _ spectral model a ) . the residuals to these fits , over the full @xmath88 kev band , are shown in the lower panels . we see that the residuals , which can be naturally explained by the introduction of cool emission components with associated intrinsic absorption ( using spectral models c and d ) , take the form of a large excess of counts between @xmath114 kev . we therefore include the caveat that if some extra emission process which can account for such residuals in the x - ray spectra were identified , then the requirement for intrinsic absorption from the x - ray data would be greatly diminished . finally , we note that the fits with spectral model a over the restricted @xmath115 energy range lead to determinations of the cluster temperatures for abell 1068 and 1795 of @xmath116 and @xmath117 kev , respectively , in excellent agreement with the results obtained for the full data sets with spectral model c. the results presented in section 6.1 show that the cooling flows in our sample are typically intrinsically absorbed by equivalent hydrogen column densities of a few @xmath118 ( taking spectral model c as our preferred model ) . assuming , in the first case , that this absorption is due to cold gas with solar metallicity , the mass of absorbing gas , @xmath119 , within a radius , @xmath120 , may be approximated as @xmath121 where @xmath120 is in units of kpc and @xmath37 in @xmath1 . for metallicities of @xmath122 in the absorbing gas ( the mean emission - weighted value for the x - ray emitting gas in the cf clusters ; allen & fabian 1998b ) the implied masses are a factor @xmath123 larger . for zero metallicity these masses are a factor @xmath15 times larger than the values given by equation 2 . ( the scaling factors for different metallicities in the absorbing material have determined from spectral simulations using the xspec code . ) we have adopted @xmath120 as the radius where the cooling time of the cluster gas first exceeds @xmath124 yr in the clusters ( a plausible age for the cooling flows in most of the cf systems ) . these radii , and the masses of absorbing gas implied by equation 2 ( using the column densities determined with spectral model c ) for both solar metallicity and @xmath125 , are listed in columns @xmath126 of table 10 . the observed masses of absorbing material may be compared to the masses expected to have been accumulated by the cooling flows @xmath127 within the same radii over the past @xmath124 yr . assuming that from time @xmath128 to @xmath129 yr , the integrated mass deposition rate within radius @xmath120 increases approximately linearly with time , the total mass accumulated within radius @xmath120 after @xmath124 yr is approximately @xmath130 at times @xmath131 yr , the mass deposition rate within @xmath120 should remain approximately constant . if instead we assume @xmath132 to be constant during the first 5 gyr , the accumulated mass will be twice the value indicated by equation 3 . ( exactly how the mass deposition rate within @xmath120 grows with time during the first 5 gyr is unclear and will depend upon the evolution of the cluster and the detailed properties of the cluster gas . ) the mass deposition rates within radii @xmath120 ( corrected for the effects of absorption due to cold gas , as discussed in section 5.1 ) and the estimated masses of cooled material accumulated by the cooling flows within these radii over a 5 gyr period , are summarized in table 10 . 6 compares the accumulated masses with the masses of absorbing material determined from the spectral data . the agreement between the results is reasonable and is maximized for a metallicity in the absorbing gas of @xmath133 ( depending on the growth of the cooling flow over the first 5gyr ) . this supports the idea that the observed x - ray absorption may be due to material accumulated by the cooling flows . we note that if the x - ray absorption in the cf clusters were due to dust rather than cold gas , a possibility examined in more detail in section 7 , then the agreement between the observed and predicted masses of absorbing material shown in fig . 6 might still be expected to hold if the dust were contained in the material deposited by the cooling flows . in this case , the mass of the absorber calculated with equation 2 would be the mass of cooled gas associated with the dust when it was deposited from the cooling flow . for a galactic dust to gas ratio , the mass in dust would be @xmath134 times smaller than the associated gas mass . the luminosities absorbed at x - ray wavelengths must eventually be reprocessed in other wavebands . if the absorbing material is dusty ( as is likely to be the case in the central regions of the clusters voit & donahue 1995 ; fabian , johnstone & daines 1994 ; allen 1995 ) then the bulk of this reprocessed emission is likely to emerge in the infrared band ( dwek , rephaeli & mather 1990 ) . table 11 summarizes the reprocessed luminosities ( _ i.e. _ the bolometric luminosities absorbed within the clusters ) measured with spectral model c. the reprocessed luminosities range from @xmath135 for abell 1795 to @xmath136 for rxj1347.5 - 1145 , with a mean value of @xmath137 . allen ( 1999 ) report detections of spatially extended @xmath138 m emission coincident with the x - ray centroids in the nearby centaurus cluster and abell 2199 . the infrared fluxes from those clusters were also shown to be in good agreement with the predicted values due to reprocessed x - ray emission from their cooling flows . we have also used the ipac scanpi software and archival iras data to measure the 60 and @xmath138 m fluxes within a four arcmin ( radius ) aperture centred on the x - ray centroids for the clusters in the present sample . ( the medians of the co - added scanpi results were used . ) the results are listed in table 11 . the error bars associated with the measured fluxes are the root - mean - square deviations in the residuals , external to the source extraction regions , after baseline subtraction . where no detection was made , an upper limit equal to three times the r.m.s . deviation in the residuals is listed . where a detection was made , we also list the in - scan separations ( in arcmin ) between the peak of the @xmath138 m emission ( or the @xmath139 m emission in the case of abell 1835 ) and the x - ray centre . two of the clusters in our sample , iras 09104 + 4109 and abell 1068 have known infrared point sources coincident with their x - ray centroids ( kleinmann 1988 ; moshir 1989 ) . the presence of these sources is confirmed by our analysis . the 60 and @xmath138 m data for abell 1704 and @xmath139 m data for abell 1835 also suggest the presence of unresolved sources , coincident with the x - ray centroids for the clusters . abell 478 and zwicky 3146 have @xmath138 m emission originating from close to their x - ray centroids , which appears spatially extended , although the infrared flux from abell 478 is probably contaminated by galactic cirrus . the data for abell 2142 , 2204 , 2261 and 2390 also provide significant detections within the four arcmin ( radius ) source apertures , although the peaks of the infrared emission from these systems are spatially offset from their x - ray centroids , suggesting that the detected flux is likely to originate , at least in part , from some other source . several of the clusters included in our study ( abell 586 , 963 , 1413 , 1795 , 2029 , 2142 and pks0745 - 191 ) have previously been studied at infrared wavelengths , using iras data , by wise ( 1993 ) and/or cox , bregman & schombert ( 1995 ) . these authors also report no clear detections of infrared emission from these sources . edge ( 1999 ) report measurements of @xmath139 m emission from abell 1835 and 60 and @xmath138 m emission from abell 2390 , using a similar analysis to that presented here . these authors also present detections of @xmath140 m emission from these clusters which , for abell 1835 , they suggest is likely to be due to dust heated by the vigorous star formation observed in the cluster core or an obscured active galactic nucleus . following helou ( 1988 ) and wise ( 1993 ) , we can estimate the total infrared luminosities implied by the observed iras fluxes and flux limits using the relation @xmath141 where @xmath142 and @xmath143 are the 60 and @xmath138 m iras fluxes in units of jy . this relation assumes a dust temperature of @xmath144k ( which is consistent with the observations ; allen 1999 ; edge 1999 ) and an emissivity index , @xmath145 , in the range @xmath146 , where the emissivity is proportional to the frequency , @xmath147 . where measurements , rather than upper limits , were obtained , we associate a systematic uncertainty of @xmath148 per cent with the estimated @xmath149 m luminosities , which is combined in quadrature with the random errors . the @xmath149 m luminosities calculated from this relation are summarized in table 11 . in general , the measurements and upper limits to the observed @xmath149 m luminosities exceed the predicted luminosities due to reprocessed x - ray radiation from the cooling flows . where measurements ( rather than upper limits ) are made , this may suggest the presence of an additional source of infrared flux , such as star formation or agn associated with the central cluster galaxies , or some other contaminating ( possibly galactic ) source . at some level , the massive starbursts at the centres of systems like abell 1068 , 1835 , 2204 2390 and zwicky 3146 ( allen 1995 ; crawford 1999 ; edge 1999 ) must contribute to the detected infrared flux . as discussed in section 6.1 , the measured intrinsic equivalent hydrogen column densities of absorbing material inferred from the asca spectra exhibit significant systematic variation , depending upon whether the single - phase or multiphase emission models are used . we have adopted the results obtained with the cooling - flow model ( model c ) as our preferred values , since this model provides a consistent description of the spectral and imaging x - ray data for the clusters . however , a number of systematic uncertainties affecting the absorption results remain with the cooling flow model . spectral model c undoubtedly over - simplifies the situation in a real cooling flow . in particular , the model assumes that the absorbing material lies in a uniform screen in front of the cooling flows . if the absorber is intrinsically associated with the clusters , then the absorbing material must , to some extent , be distributed throughout the cooling flows . allen & fabian ( 1997 ; see also wise & sarazin 1999 ) discuss two different , limiting geometries for the absorbing material ; partial covering and multilayer absorption . the partial covering model , with a covering factor @xmath150 , can be expected to apply or where there are @xmath151 individual absorbing clouds along each line of sight and/or where the absorbing material is strongly clumped on large scales . however , as discussed in section 6.1 , covering fractions significantly less than unity are found to provide a poor description of the asca spectra , suggesting that the absorbing material is likely to be more smoothly distributed throughout the cooling flows . the multilayer absorption model discussed by allen & fabian ( 1997 ) is applicable where the absorbing material is made up of a large number of similarly sized absorbing clouds , each with a column density much less than the total intrinsic column density ( @xmath37 ) , homogeneously distributed throughout the x - ray emitting medium . for an intrinsic emission spectrum @xmath152 , the observed spectrum , @xmath153 , emerging from the emitting / absorbing region may be written ( where @xmath154 is the absorption cross - section ) as @xmath155 we have simulated cooling flow spectra with multilayer absorption , with total column densities of between @xmath1 and @xmath156 , and fitted these with simple models which assume that the absorbing material acts as a uniform screen in front of the cooling flow ( as with model c ) . for the simulations we adopt an emission spectrum appropriate for a constant pressure cooling flow , with an upper temperature of 7 kev and a metallicity of @xmath157 . we use a response matrix appropriate for the asca sis detectors . the comparison between the fitted ( uniform screen ) column densities and the true total ( multilayer ) values are shown in fig . we see that for multilayer column densities of @xmath158 , the fitted column densities underestimate the true values by factors of @xmath159 . ( these results are not sensitive to any reasonable choice of galactic column density . ) if the multilayer model approximates the true distribution of x - ray emitting and absorbing material in cooling flows , then the results obtained with spectral model c would imply true equivalent column - densities of intrinsic absorbing gas in the cluster cores of , typically , a few @xmath160 . importantly , we also note that for signal - to - noise ratios appropriate for asca observations of bright clusters ( with count rates of @xmath161ct s@xmath58 in the sis detectors and exposure times of @xmath162 ks ) , the simple uniform - screen absorption model provides a good fit to the simulated spectra with multilayer absorption , for total column densities @xmath163 . ( for larger total column densities , complex residuals are detected in the spectra at energies @xmath164kev . ) the large intrinsic column densities implied by the multilayer models would have strong implications for the nature of the absorbing matter . in particular , column densities of @xmath165 of gaseous material with solar metallicity would be very difficult to reconcile with current hi and co limits , even if this material were very cold and highly molecular . ( we also note that in the case of a multilayer distribution , the implied masses of absorbing gas would often exceed the predicted accumulated masses due to the cooling flows and imply , at least in part , some other origin for the absorbing medium . ) in the following section , we explore these issues in more detail and summarize the current observational constraints on the physical nature of the absorbing matter . the results presented in this paper provide a consistent picture for the x - ray properties of cooling flows in x - ray luminous clusters of galaxies . the asca spectra and rosat images provide independent determinations of the mass cooling rates in the clusters in good agreement with each other , when a consistent method of analysis is employed ( section 5.1 ) . the spectral data require the presence of large column densities of intrinsic x - ray absorbing material associated with the cooling gas ( section 6 ) . the implied masses of absorbing material are in reasonable agreement with the masses expected to have been accumulated by the cooling flows over their lifetimes ( section 6.2 ) , identifying this material as a plausible sink for the bulk of the cooled gas from the flows . despite the evidence for intrinsic x - ray absorption associated with cooling flows , however , searches for this material in other wavebands have , to date , proved largely unsuccessful ( at least outside of the central @xmath166 kpc ) . we here briefly review these observations and comment on their implications for the physical state of the x - ray absorbing matter . more detailed discussions of a number of these issues are given by ferland , fabian & johnstone ( 1994 ) , daines , fabian & thomas ( 1994 ) , fabian ( 1994a ) , odea ( 1994a ) , voit & donahue ( 1995 ) , odea & baum ( 1996 ) , arnaud & mushotzky ( 1988 ) and henkel & wiklind ( 1998 ) . as mentioned in section 5.2 , the central ( @xmath166 kpc ) regions of cf clusters are commonly observed to be sites of ongoing star formation with powerful , associated optical line emission ( johnstone 1987 ; heckman 1989 ; mcnamara & oconnell 1989 ; crawford & fabian 1992 ; allen 1995 ; cardiel 1995 , 1998 ; mcnamara 1996 ; voit & donahue 1997 ; crawford 1999 ) . nearly all cf clusters with short central cooling times ( @xmath167gyr ) exhibit such phenomena ( peres 1998 ) , whereas systems with longer central cooling times ( including all ncf clusters ) generally do not . the observed levels of star formation imply the presence of at least moderate masses of cooled gas in the cores of cf clusters , sufficient in a few cases to account for the bulk of the mass deposited by the cooling flows in those regions ( allen 1995 ) and at least some causal connection with the cooling flows . at radio wavelengths , extensive searches have been carried out for 21 cm line - emission associated with warm atomic hydrogen in the cores of cf clusters ( valentijn & giovanelli 1982 ; odea & baum 1996 ) . the negative results obtained ( with the exception of m87 ; jaffe 1992 ) typically constrain the column densities of optically thin material to be less than a few @xmath168 and , for an assumed spin temperature , @xmath169k , the number of clouds along the line of sight to be @xmath170 ( odea & baum 1996 ) . searches have also been made for the 21 cm absorption signature of cold atomic hydrogen ( mcnamara , bregman & oconnell 1990 ; jaffe 1992 ; dwarakanath , van gorkom & owen 1994 ; odea , gallimore & baum 1995 ; odea & baum 1996 ; johnstone 1998 ) . such material has been detected across the central few kpc of a few cf clusters , including abell 426 ( crane , van der hulst & haschick 1982 ; sijbring 1989 ; jaffe 1990 ) 2a0335 + 096 ( mcnamara 1990 ) , hydra a ( dwarakanath , van gorkom & owen 1995 ) , mkw3s ( mcnamara 1990 ) and abell 2597 ( odea , baum & gallimore 1994 ) with typical column densities of a few @xmath171 . however , for most clusters only negative results have been obtained , with upper limits to the column densities of 10k gas ( assuming a covering fraction of unity and a velocity width of @xmath172 kms@xmath58 ; dwarakanath 1994 , odea & baum 1996 ) of @xmath173 . laor ( 1997 ) presents tight limits on the column density of atomic hydrogen towards the core of abell 426 ( @xmath174 ) from ly@xmath175 observations made with the hubble space telescope ( see also johnstone & fabian 1995 ) . together , the results on hi emission and absorption , and ly@xmath175 absorption , imply that the bulk of the material responsible for the observed x - ray absorption can not be in the form of atomic hydrogen . an issue of crucial importance in interpreting the 21 cm hi results and the results from co studies ( see below ) is the expected temperature of x - ray absorber , if in gaseous form , which has proved controversial . johnstone , fabian & taylor ( 1998 ; updating earlier calculations by ferland , fabian & johnstone 1994 and fabian 1994a ) suggest that cooled gas clouds , in equilibrium with the cooling - flow environment , are likely to be very cold . johnstone ( 1998 ) suggest that dust - free clouds form an extended outer envelope , with a column density of @xmath176 and a temperature of 13 - 17k , beyond which the gas drops to the microwave background temperature . for galactic dust / gas ratios , however , the results are significantly modified , such that the cloud temperature drops to the microwave background temperature after a column density of only @xmath177 . at such low temperatures , dusty gas is likely to be highly molecular . however , these predictions differ from those of odea ( 1994a ) and voit & donahue ( 1995 ) who suggest a minimum temperature for such clouds of @xmath178k , even in the presence of dust . braine ( 1995 ) also suggest a minimum temperature of @xmath179k for the absorbing gas . possible reasons for the discrepancies between these results ( with contrasting views ) are discussed by voit & donahue ( 1995 ) and ferland ( in preparation ) . extensive searches have been carried out for co associated with molecular gas in cooling flows . to date co emission has only been detected in abell 426 ( lazareff 1989 ; mirabel , sanders d.b . & kazs i. 1989 ) . braine ( 1995 ) also present limits on co absorption in the central regions of this cluster ) . the upper limits to the column density of molecular hydrogen in the inner regions of other clusters ( for an assumed kinetic temperature of @xmath180k and a covering fraction of unity ) are typically @xmath181 a few @xmath0 ( odea 1994a , antonucci & barvainis 1994 , mcnamara & jaffe 1994 ; braine & dupraz 1995 ; odea & baum 1996 ) which is significantly below the x - ray inferred column densities . the co results also constrain the number of clouds along the line of sight ( for @xmath180k ) to be @xmath182 ( odea 1994a ; odea & baum 1996 ) . the co emission limits appear to exclude the possibility of large column densities ( _ i.e. _ values consistent with the x - ray measurements ) of molecular gas , with a kinetic temperature @xmath183k . however , if the bulk of the x - ray gas cools to the microwave background temperature , as suggested by johnstone ( 1998 ) , the co limits may be consistent with the x - ray data . it should be noted that the determinations of molecular hydrogen masses from co observations are affected by a number of additional uncertainties . firstly , the co / h@xmath184 ratios in cluster cooling flows may differ from galactic values . in particular , where the temperature and metallicity of the absorbing gas is low , the use of a standard galactic co / h@xmath184 ratio may underestimate the mass of molecular gas ( maloney & black 1988 ; madden 1997 ) . it is unclear whether x - ray absorbing gas accumulated by cooling flows could have substantially sub - solar metallicity . allen & fabian ( 1998b ) determine a mean emission - weighted metallicity for the x - ray emitting gas in cf clusters of @xmath185 . these authors also show that cf clusters generally contain metallicity gradients , so that the metallicity of the x - ray gas within the cooling radii of cf systems will , on average , exceed this value . thus , it seems unlikely that the material currently being deposited from the cooling flows will have substantially sub - solar metallicities . however , if the x - ray absorbing material is formed from the matter deposited by the cooling flows over their lifetimes , the metallicity of this material could be somewhat lower . within an inhomogeneous cooling flow ( nulsen 1986 , 1998 ; thomas , fabian & nulsen 1987 ) the denser gas at any particular radius will tend to have a smaller volume filling factor . if the metals are evenly distributed throughout the volume of the cooling flow at any particular radius ( whether this will occur is unclear ) , the least dense gas will contain most of the metals ( reisenegger , miralda - escud & waxman 1996 ) . since the densest material in cooling flows will have the shortest cooling time and be deposited first , the material accumulated by the cooling flows over their histories could have a significantly lower metallicity than the material being deposited today . conversely , if the metals in cooling flows were concentrated in the densest material , the metallicity of the x - ray absorbing material could exceed that of the x - ray emitting gas . fabian ( 1994a ) , have suggested that the masses of molecular gas inferred from co observations could be significantly underestimated if most of the co in the absorbing material has frozen onto dust grains . such freezing should occur rapidly ( on timescales @xmath186 yr ) if even small amounts of dust are initially present in the absorbing gas ( voit & donahue 1995 ) . daines ( 1994 ) and fabian ( 1994a ) discuss how dust is likely to form even in clouds that are initially free of dust , on timescales @xmath187 yr ( although see also voit & donahue 1995 ) . optical , uv and sub - mm studies of the cores of cooling flows show that dust lanes ( sparks , macchetto & golombek 1989 ; mcnamara & oconnell 1992 ) and intrinsic reddening ( hu 1992 ; allen 1995 ; edge 1999 ) are common . elston & maloney ( 1994 ) and jaffe & bremer ( 1997 ) report detections of h@xmath184(1 - 0)s(1 ) emission from warm ( @xmath188k ) molecular hydrogen from k - band spectroscopy of the inner few kpc of a number of cf systems ( including abell 478 and and pks0745 - 191 ) . no detections of such emission have been made in ncf systems . the h@xmath184s emission is likely to arise from the heated skin of cold molecular clouds which could also be responsible for the optical emission - line phenomena discussed above . a final possibility , first discussed in detail by voit & donahue ( 1995 ; see also arnaud & mushotzky 1998 ) , is that the x - ray absorption could be due to dust , with little or no associated gas . the k - absorption edge of oxygen is a primary source of x - ray absorption and its signature is fairly insensitive to the physical state of the oxygen , so long as it is not highly ionized . the introduction of a simple oik absorption edge at @xmath189 kev in the asca analysis ( such as might be associated with oxygen - rich , silicate dust grains ) typically provides at least as good a model for the intrinsic absorption as a cold gaseous absorber . arnaud & mushotzky ( 1998 ) have shown that @xmath190 kev broad band x - ray telescope data for the perseus cluster require excess absorption which is significantly better - explained by a simple oxygen absorption edge ( which they associate with dust ) than by a cold , gaseous absorption model . verification of this important result will be possible in the near future using observations made with the chandra observatory and xmm . optical and uv spectroscopy of the central emission - line nebulosities in cooling flows indicate the presence of significant amounts of dust ( hu 1992 ; allen 1995 ; crawford 1999 ) . allen ( 1995 ) also show that the column densities of absorbing gas inferred from the optical reddening studies are in reasonable agreement with the x - ray values , for galactic dust / gas ratios . the infrared observations reported here and elsewhere , together with the sub - mm results of edge ( 1999 ) , require the presence of significant dust masses in the core regions of at least a few nearby and/or exceptionally massive cooling flows ( for which the best data exist ) and are consistent with dust being a common feature of cf clusters . limits on background counts of galaxies and quasars behind clusters are consistent with extinctions ranging from @xmath191 ( boyle , fong & shanks 1988 ; romani & maoz 1992 ) , although measurements of galaxy colours in nearby clusters constrain the reddening on cluster - wide scales to be @xmath192 mag ( ferguson 1993 ) . voit & donahue ( 1995 ) argue that the levels of dust required to account for the observed x - ray absorption are unlikely to lie entirely within the cores of the clusters , and should be distributed more widely throughout the cluster gas . rosat results on the spatial distribution of the x - ray absorbing material ( allen & fabian 1997 ) show it to be centrally concentrated within the cooling radii of clusters and possibly be confined within cooling flows . however , the x - ray data are also consistent with a scenario in which the absorbing material is distributed in a manner similar to the x - ray emitting gas . this is illustrated in fig . 8(a ) , where we show the equivalent column densities of hydrogen ions in the x - ray emitting gas through two simulated clusters ; one cf and one ncf system . the gas distributions have been modeled as isothermal spheres , with core radii of 50 and 300 kpc , respectively ( and have been normalized to provide total x - ray gas masses within 3mpc of the cluster centres of @xmath193 ) . we see that the distribution of x - ray emitting gas is much more centrally concentrated in the cf system , particularly within the central @xmath134 kpc . 8(b ) shows the corresponding x - ray absorbing column densities as a function of radius ( as would be determined from observations with asca - like ccd detectors in the @xmath88 kev band ) in the case where the intracluster gas has an equivalent metallicity in dust grains of @xmath194 solar . for simplicity , we assume that the dust has an absorption spectrum in the asca band similar to that of metal - rich cold gas ( morrison & mccammon 1983 ; qualitatively similar results are obtained for an oxygen edge at 0.54 kev ) . we also assume that the absorber follows a multilayer distribution within the x - ray emitting medium , but is modeled as a uniform absorbing screen in front of the emitting regions . the results imply mean emission - weighted column densities ( where we assume the x - ray emissivity to be proportional to square of the gas density ) of @xmath195 for the cf cluster , and a few @xmath196 for the ncf system . ( the absolute results on the excess column densities will depend upon the chemical composition of the dust ) . we thus see that if the x - ray absorption is due to dust , with a spatial distribution that follows the x - ray gas , then we can expect absorption signatures to be present in both cf and ncf clusters , but to be stronger in cf systems ( assuming in each case that an appropriate spectral model is used in the analysis ) . we would also expect the absorption to be concentrated towards the cores of cf clusters , in agreement with the observations . we note that if the x - ray absorption were entirely due to a pre - existing distribution of dust grains distributed throughout the clusters , then the agreement between the observed masses of absorbing matter ( calculated assuming that the absorption is due to cold gas confined within the cooling flows ) and the masses predicted to have been accumulated by the cooling flows over their lifetimes ( fig . 6 ) must be regarded as coincidence . however , it remains possible that both material accumulated by the cooling flows and a more extended distribution of large dust grains ( presumably due to supernovae enrichment at early epochs ) could contribute to the x - ray absorption . the lifetime of grains of radius @xmath197 m to sputtering in hot gas of density @xmath145 is @xmath198 ( draine & salpeter 1979 ) . provided that individual grains exceed 10@xmath199 m in radius , they should survive for a hubble time or longer throughout ncf clusters and beyond the cooling radius in clusters with cooling flows . within cooling flows , the gas density rises inward so the grains are increasingly sputtered , releasing the metals into the gas phase which thus becomes increasingly metal rich towards the cluster centre . this provides one possible explanation for the abundance gradients inferred to be present in most cf clusters ( allen & fabian 1998b ; see also irwin & bregman 1999 ) . however , @xmath200 m grains are optically thick to soft x - rays and so some distribution of grain sizes extending to smaller values is required if dust is responsible for the observed x - ray absorption ( laor & draine 1993 ) . we note that the sputtering of small ( @xmath201 m ) grains will significantly modify the reddening law in clusters with respect to the standard galactic relation , reducing the optical / uv reddening ( laor & draine 1993 ) . in conclusion , the available data from other wavebands provide some support for the large column densities of intrinsic absorbing material inferred to be present from the x - ray data , at least in the innermost regions of cooling flows . optical and sub - mm observations of star formation in the cores of cf clusters and k - band observations of emission lines from molecular hydrogen suggest that significant masses of dusty , molecular gas are present in the central few tens of kpc of many cf clusters . the constraints from 21 cm observations suggest that the bulk of the material accumulated by cooling flows can not remain in a long - lived reservoir of atomic hydrogen . substantial masses of molecular gas may be distributed throughout cooling flows and as yet have avoided detection , but this material must be very cold ( @xmath202k ) and dusty , a possibility that remains controversial . the very large x - ray column densities ( @xmath165 ) required if the absorbing material has a multilayer distribution are probably incompatible with a gaseous absorber . it remains possible that dust grains , either present in the cooled material deposited by the cooling flows or distributed throughout the clusters in a manner similar to the x - ray gas , may be responsible for much of the observed x - ray absorption . the main conclusions that may be drawn from this paper may be summarized as follows : 0.2 cm \(i ) we have demonstrated the need for multiphase models to consistently explain the spectral and imaging x - ray data for the cf clusters included in our study . the mass deposition rates from the cooling flows , independently inferred from multiphase analyses of the asca spectra and deprojection analyses of the rosat hri images , exhibit good agreement , especially once the effects of intrinsic x - ray absorption have been accounted for in a consistent manner . the mass deposition rates from the largest cooling flows exceed 1000 , identifying these as some of the most massive cooling flows known . \(ii ) we have confirmed the presence of intrinsic x - ray absorption in the cluster spectra using a variety of spectral models . the measured equivalent hydrogen column densities are sensitive to the spectral models used in the analysis , ranging from a few @xmath0 for a simple isothermal emission model to a few @xmath1 using our preferred cooling - flow models , assuming in each case that the absorber lies in a uniform foreground screen . both the cf and ncf systems exhibit excess absorption at a similar level ( on average ) when analysed with the same , simple isothermal model . \(iii ) the masses of x - ray absorbing material inferred to be present in the cf clusters ( assuming the absorption to be due to cold gas with a covering fraction of unity ) are in reasonable agreement with the masses expected to have been accumulated by the cooling flows over their lifetimes . \(iv ) the asca spectra constrain the covering fraction of the absorbing material acting on the cooling flows to be close to ( or exceed ) unity . if the x - ray absorption is due to many small , similarly - sized clouds along each line of sight , intermixed with the x - ray emitting gas , then the column densities inferred from the spectral analysis may significantly underestimate the true column densities of absorbing material in the cooling flows . \(vii ) we have summarized the constraints on the physical properties of the x - ray absorbing material from observations in other wavebands . substantial 60 and 100@xmath199 m fluxes , sufficient to account for the bolometric luminosities absorbed and reprocessed within the clusters , are detected from several of the largest cooling flows . optical observations of star formation in the cores of cooling flows also suggests that significant masses of molecular gas are present in the central few tens of kpc of many cf systems . constraints from 21 cm observations suggest that the bulk of the material accumulated within the cooling radii can not remain in a long - lived reservoir of atomic hydrogen . substantial masses of molecular gas may be distributed throughout cooling flows and as yet have avoided detection , although this material must be very cold ( @xmath202k ) , a possibility that remains controversial . the very large x - ray column densities ( @xmath165 ) required if the absorbing material has a multilayer distribution are probably incompatible with a gaseous absorber . it remains possible that dust grains , either present in the material accumulated by the cooling flows or distributed more widely in a manner similar to the x - ray gas , may be responsible for much of the x - ray absorption . i thank andy fabian , roderick johnstone and dave white for many helpful discussions and harald ebeling , alastair edge and carolin crawford for their continuing efforts with the bcs project . i acknowledge the support of the royal society . allen s.w . , 1995 , mnras , 276 , 947 allen s.w . , 1998 , mnras , 296 , 392 allen s.w . , fabian a.c . , 1997 , mnras , 286 , 583 allen s.w . , fabian a.c . , 1998a , mnras , 297 , l57 allen s.w . , fabian a.c . , 1998b , mnras , 297 , l63 allen s.w . , fabian a.c . , johnstone r.m . , white d.a . , daines s.j . , edge a.c . , stewart g.c . , 1993 , mnras , 262 , 901 allen s.w . , fabian a.c . , edge a.c . , bhringer h. , white d.a . , 1995 , mnras , 275 , 741 allen s.w . , fabian a.c . , edge a.c . , bautz m.w . , furuzawa a. , tawara y. , 1996 , mnras , 283 , 263 allen s.w . , fabian a.c . , johnstone r.m . , arnaud k.a . , nulsen p.e.j . , 1999 , mnras , submitted akritas m.g . , bershady m.a . , 1996 , apj , 470 , 706 anders e. , grevesse n. , 1989 , geochemica et cosmochimica acta 53 , 197 antonucci r. , barvainis r. , 1994 , aj , 107 , 448 arnaud , k.a . , 1996 , in astronomical data analysis software and systems v , eds . jacoby g. and barnes j. , asp conf . series volume 101 , p17 arnaud k.a . , 1988 , in fabian a.c . , ed , cooling flows in clusters and galaxies . kluwer , dordrecht , p. 31 arnaud k.a . , mushotzky r.f . , 1998 , apj , 501 , 119 balucinska - church m. , mccammon d. , 1992 , apj , 400 , 699 bevington p.r . , 1969 , data reduction and error analysis for the physical sciences . mcgraw - hill , new york binney j. , tremaine s. , 1987 , galactic dynamics , princeton univ . press , princeton bhringer h. , tanaka y. , mushotzky r.f . , ikebe y. , hattori m. , 1998 , a&a , 334 , 789 boyle b.j . , fong r. , shanks t. , 1988 , mnras , 231 , 897 braine j. , dupraz c. , 1994 , a&a , 283 , 407 braine j. , wyrowski f. , radford s.j.e . , henkel c. , lesch h. , 1995 , a&a , 293 , 315 buote d.a . , tsai j.c . , 1996 , apj , 458 , 27 cardiel n. , gorgas j. , aragon - salamanca a. , 1995 , mnras , 277 , 502 cardiel n. , gorgas j. , aragon - salamanca a. , 1998 , mnras , 298 , 977 cavaliere a. , fusco - femiano r. , 1976 , a&a , 49 , 137 cavaliere a. , fusco - femiano r. , 1978 , a&a , 49 , 137 cox c.v . , bregman j.n . , schombert j.m . , 1995 , apjs , 99 , 405 crane p , van der hulst j.m . , haschick a. , 1982 , iaus , 97 , 307 crawford c.s . , fabian a.c . , 1992 , mnras , 259 , 265 crawford c.s . , allen s.w . , ebeling h. , edge a.c . , fabian a.c . , 1999 , mnras , 306 , 857 daines s.j . , fabian a.c . , thomas , p.a . , 1994 , mnras , 268 , 1060 david l.p . , slyz a. , jones c. , forman w. , vrtilek s.d . , arnaud k.a . , 1993 , apj , 412 , 479 david l.p . , harnden f.r . , kearns k.e . , zombeck m.v . , 1996 , the rosat hri calibration report , @xmath203 dickey j.m . , lockman f.j . , 1990 , ara&a , 28 , 215 draine b.t . , salpeter e.e . , 1979 , apj , 231 , 77 dwarakanath k.s . , van gorkom j.h . , owen f.n . , 1994 , apj , 432 , 469 dwarakanath k.s . , owen f.n . , van gorkom j.h . , 1995 , apj , 442 , l1 dwek e. , rephaeli y. , mather j.c . , 1990 , apj , 350 , 104 ebeling h. , voges w. , bhringer h. , edge a.c . , huchra j.p . , briel u.g . , 1996 , mnras , 281 , 799 ebeling h. , edge a.c . , bhringer h. , allen s.w . , crawford c.s . , fabian a.c . , voges w. , huchra j.p . , 1998 , mnras , 301 , 881 edge a.c . , stewart g.c . , fabian a.c . , 1992 , mnras , 258 , 177 edge a.c . , ivison rr.j . , smail i. , blain a.w . , kneib j .- . , 1999 , mnras , 306 , 599 elston r. , maloney p. , 1994 , in infrared astronomy with arrays , assl , 190 , kluwer , dordrecht , p. 169 fabian a.c . , 1994 , a&ar , 32 , 277 fabian a.c . , nulsen p.e.j . , canizares c.r . , 1991 , a&ar , 2 , 191 fabian a.c . , johnstone r.m . , daines s.j . , 1994a , mnras , 271 , 737 fabian a.c . , hu e.m . , cowie l.l . , grindlay j. , 1981 , apj , 248 , 47 fabian a.c . , arnaud k.a . , bautz m.w . , tawara y. , 1994b , apj , 436 , l63 ferguson h.c . , 1993 , mnras , 263 , 343 feretti l. , giovannini g. , bhringer h. , 1997 , newa , 2 , 501 ferland g.j . , fabian a.c . , johnstone r.m . , 1994 , mnras , 266 , 399 fukazawa y. 1994 , pasj , 46 , l55 heckman t.m . , baum s.a . , van breugel w.j.m . , mccarthy p. , 1989 , apj , 338 , 48 helou g. , khan i.r . , malek l. , boehmer l. , 1988 , apjs , 68 , 151 henkel c. , wiklind t. , 1997 , ssrv , 81 , 1 hu e.m . , 1992 , apj , 391 , 608 ikebe y. , makishima k. , fukazawa y. , tamura t. , xu h. , ohashi t. , matsushita k. , 1999 , apj , in press irwin j.a . , bregman j.n . , 1999 , apj , submitted irwin j.a . , sarazin c.l . , 1995 , apj , 355 , 497 jaffe w. , 1990 , a&a , 240 , 254 jaffe w. , 1992 , in fabian a.c . , ed . , clusters and superclusters of galaxies , kluwer , dordrecht , p. 109 jaffe w. , bremer m.n . , 1997 , mnras , 284l , 1 johnstone r.m . , fabian a.c . , 1995 , mnras , 273 , 625 johnstone r.m . , fabian a.c . , nulsen p.e.j . , 1987 , mnras , 224 , 75 johnstone r.m . , fabian a.c . , taylor g.b . , 1998 , mnras , 298 , 854 johnstone r.m . , fabian a.c . , edge a.c . , thomas p.a . , 1992 , mnras , 255 , 431 jones c. , forman w. , 1984 , apj , 276 , 38 kaastra j.s . , mewe r. , 1993 , legacy , 3 , heasarc , nasa kleinmann s.g . , hamilton d. , keel w.c . , wynn - williams c.g . , eales s.a . , becklin e.e . , kuntz k.d . , 1988 , apj , 328 , 161 kneib j .- p . , mellier y. , pell r. , miralda - escud j. , le borgne j .- f . , bhringer h. , picat j .- , 1995 , a&a , 303,27 laor a. , 1997 , apj , 483 , l103 laor a. , draine b.t . , 1993 , apj , 402 , 441 lazareff b. , castets a. , kim d - w . , jura m. , 1989 , apj , 336 , l13 liedahl d.a . , osterheld a.l . , goldstein w.h . , 1995 , apj , 438 , l115 madden s.c . , poglitsch a. , geis n. , stacey g.j . , townes c.h . , 1997 , 483 , 200 maloney p. , black j.h . , 1988 , apj , 325 , 389 makishima k. , 1997 , in makino f. , mitsuda k. , eds . , x - ray imaging and spectroscopy of cosmic hot plasmas , universal academy press , tokyo , p. 137 markevitch m. , 1996 , apj , 465 , l1 markevitch m. , forman w.r . , sarazin c.l . , vikhlinin a. , 1998 , apj , 503 , 77 matsumoto h. , koyama k. , awaki h. , tomida h. , tsuru t. , mushotzky r. , hatsukade i. , 1996 , pasj , 48 , 201 mcnamara b.r . , jaffe w. , 1994 , a&a , 281 , 673 mcnamara b.r . , oconnell r.w . , 1989 , aj , 98 , 2018 mcnamara b.r . , oconnell r.w . , 1992 , apj , 393 , 589 mcnamara b.r . , bregman j.n . , oconnell , 1990 , apj , 360 , 20 mcnamara b.r . , jannuzi b.t . , elston r. , sarazin c.l . , wise m. , 1996 , apj , 469 , 66 mirabel i.f . , sanders d.b . , kazs i. , 1989 , apj , 340 , l9 morrison r. , mccammon d. , 1983 , apj , 270 , 119 moshir m. , 1989 . explanatory supplement to the iras faint source survey . ipac preprint 44 nulsen p.e.j . , 1986 , mnras , 221 , 377 nulsen p.e.j . , 1998 , mnras , 297 , 1109 odea c.p . , baum s.a . , 1996 , in cold gas at high redshift , eds bremer m.n . , van der werf p.p . , rttgering h.j.a . , carilli c.l . , kluwer , dordrecht , p.199 odea c.p . , baum s.a . , gallimore j.f . , 1994b , apj , 436 , 669 odea c.p . , gallimore j.f . , baum s.a . , 1995 , aj , 109 , 26 odea c.p . , baum s.a . , maloney p.r . , tacconi l.j . , sparks w.b . , 1994a , apj , 422 , 467 peres c.b . , fabian a.c . , edge a.c . , allen s.w . , johnstone r.m . , white d.a . , 1998 , mnras , 298 , 416 press w.h . , teukolsky s.a . , vetterling w.t . , flannery b.p . , 1992 , numerical recipes , cambridge university press reisenegger a. , miralda - escud j. , waxman e. , 1996 , apj , 457 , 11l rizza e. , burns j.o . , ledlow m.j . , owen f.n . , voges w. , bliton m. , 1998 , mnras , 301 , 328 romani r.w . , maoz d. , 1992 , apj , 386 , 36 schindler s. , hattori m. , neumann d.m . , bhringer h. , 1997 , a&a , 317 , 646 sijbring d. , de bruyn a.g . , jaffe w.j . , sancisi r. , in meurs e.j.a , fosbury r.a.e . , extranuclear activity in galaxies , european southern observatory , 1989 , garching bei munchen , p107 smail i. , hogg d.w . , blandford r. , cohen j.g . , edge a.c . , djorgovski s.g . , 1995 , mnras , 277 , 1 smail i. , ellis r.e . , dressler a. , couch w.j . , oemler a. , sharples r.m . , butcher h. , 1997 , apj , 479 , 70 sparks w.b . , macchetto f. , golombek d. , 1989 , apj , 345 , 153 squires g. , neumann d.m . , kaiser n. , arnaud m. , babul a. , bhringer h. , fahlman g. , woods d. , 1997 , apj , 482 , 648 tanaka y. , inoue h. , holt s.s . , 1994 , pasj , 46 , l37 thomas p.a . , fabian a.c . , nulsen p.e.j , 1987 , mnras , 228 , 973 valentijn e.a . , giovanelli r. , 1982 , a&a , 114 , 208 voit g.m . , donahue m. , 1995 , apj , 452 , 164 voit g.m . , donahue m. , 1997 , apj , 486 , 242 waxman e. , miralda - escud j. , 1995 , apj , 451 , 451 white d.a . , fabian a.c . , johnstone r.m . , mushotzky r.f . , arnaud k.a . , 1991 , mnras , 252 , 72 white d.a . , jones c. , forman w. , 1997 , mnras , 292 , 419 wise m.w . , sarazin c.l . , 1999 , apj , submitted wise m.w . , oconnell r.w . , bregman j.n . , roberts m.s . , 1993 , apj , 405 , 94 Abstract:

Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.

Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered . Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video . Paper: phylogenetics is a study of how species are related to each other . evolutionary relationships are most conveniently represented by rooted leaf - labelled trees , where the leaves represent extant species and the root represents their most recent common ancestral species . similarly other internal vertices of evolutionary trees correspond to extinct ancestral species . the arrival of dna and protein sequence data in the last forty years led to explosive growth of phylogenetics . many of the modern phylogenetic methods consider sequence data under probabilistic models of sequence evolution . for such models to be useful for phylogenetic inference , it is important to establish their _ identifiability _ ( i.e. , to show that nonisomorphic trees or different model parameters can not induce the same distribution on the sequences at the leaves under a given model of sequence evolution ) . mathematical theory of phylogenetic trees , especially probabilistic models of sequence evolution , the associated questions of identifiability and statistical consistency ( especially of the maximum likelihood methods ) have been extensively studied @xcite , giving a firm statistical foundation to the study of phylogenetic trees . while phylogenetic trees represent relationships between species , population pedigrees represent how individuals within a population are related to each other . communities all over the world have long been curious about knowing their ancestral histories , and have often kept detailed records of their family trees . in fact this curiosity goes back much further in the past than the interest in constructing evolutionary relationships between species . an example of a fairly detailed record of family histories is the icelandic database slendingab ( the book of icelanders http://www.islendingabok.is ) of genealogical records that covers almost the whole icelandic population and goes back to nearly 1200 years . such ancestral histories are often compiled from a variety of sources such as church records , birth and death records , obituaries etc . that are prone to ambiguities or missing data beyond a few generations in the past . in the last several years large amounts of data on intra - population genetic variation have been recorded . for example , the icelandic biomedical company decode genetics has compiled genomic , genealogical and health data of more than 100000 individuals ( which is a significant proportion of the current icelandic population ) . such data offer promising opportunity to cross check and resolve ambiguities in historic genealogical records besides being useful for other studies such as , for example , genetic factors associated with medical conditions . therefore , there is a renewed interest in accurately inferring pedigrees from genomic data . the statistical and combinatorial foundation for studying reconstruction problems for pedigrees has not been as developed as in phylogenetics . a purpose of this paper is to continue our earlier attempts to develop such a foundation for the problem of reconstructing pedigrees from observations ( sequences ) on extant individuals . to develop such a foundation , we need to establish results along the following lines : developing a biologically realistic model for sequences undergoing mutations and recombinations , and identifiability results for such a model ; statistical consistency results ; and finally results that give estimates for the amount of genomic data necessary to reliably construct pedigrees . this paper is mainly about identifiability questions . in the rest of this section , we discuss the above theoretical motivation in more detail . we begin by informally sketching some well known reconstruction and identifiability results for phylogenetic trees that not only motivate the work in this paper but also are crucially useful in the proof of the main identifiability result of this paper . _ results of zarecki and buneman . _ it was shown in @xcite that a leaf - labelled tree can be uniquely constructed from the pairwise distances between its leaves . the result was strengthened slightly as follows @xcite . suppose that @xmath0 is an _ additive function _ on the family of subsets of cardinality 2 of the vertex set of a leaf - labelled tree . here _ additive _ means that for any two vertices @xmath1 and @xmath2 , we have @xmath3 , where the summation is over all edges @xmath4 on the ( unique ) path from @xmath1 to @xmath2 . buneman showed that knowing @xmath0 on all pairs of leaves of a leaf - labelled tree without vertices of degree 2 is sufficient to uniquely construct the tree and the function . it is not surprising that these results are quite useful in phylogenetics , where observations on extant species ( leaves of an evolutionary tree ) are used to infer a suitably defined distance ( or an additive function ) between pairs of species , and then their phylogenetic tree is constructed uniquely . _ results of steel and chang . _ now suppose the evolutionary process on a ( rooted ) tree is modelled as follows : first the root is assigned a random state from a finite alphabet @xmath5 ( e.g. , @xmath5 may be \{a , t , g , c } in the case of dna sequences ) . each state is assumed to have a nonzero probability of being assigned to the root . each edge of the tree has associated with it a @xmath6 matrix of substitution probabilities . these substitution probabilities determine how the vertex - states evolve away from the root , and induce a distribution of states at the leaves of the tree . the model was formulated in @xcite as described above , while a slightly more general formulation in terms of markov random fields on unrooted trees was given in @xcite . it was independently shown by chang and steel that when the matrices defining the substitution probabilities satisfy certain mild conditions , the ( unrooted ) tree can be uniquely recovered from the joint distribution of states at the leaves of the tree . in particular they showed that the negative logarithm of the determinant of the matrix of substitution probabilities between pairs of vertices is an additive function on the pairs of vertices , and can be computed from the probability distribution on extant sequences . it was further proved in @xcite that the substitution matrices are also identifiable from the marginal distributions on triples of leaves of the tree . special cases of these results for models more commonly used in phylogenetics were known in the phylogenetics literature earlier . how far can we generalise such results if the underlying structure is more general than a tree ? a recent result in this direction is due to @xcite where it is shown that under some mild non - degeneracy conditions the dependency structure of a markov random field can be obtained from sufficiently many independent samples . in this paper we present simple models for recombinations and mutations for population pedigrees , and generalise phylogenetic identifiability results for them . one difference between reconstructing markov random fields and reconstructing pedigrees is that for pedigrees we have observations only on the extant individuals ( e.g. , dna sequences derived from living individuals ) . moreover , in the problem of reconstructing pedigrees , the samples of data ( e.g. , columns in a sequence alignment ) are not _ i.i.d . _ ( independent and identically distributed ) as a result of recombinations . in @xcite , we studied some purely combinatorial reconstruction problems motivated by zarecki s result , for example , the problem of reconstructing a pedigree from the pairwise distances between its extant individuals or from its subpedigrees ( pedigrees of subsets of the extant population ) . in @xcite , we showed that a pedigree can not in general be reconstructed from the collection of its proper subpedigrees . such a result implies that knowing pairwise distances between extant vertices is in general not enough to reconstruct pedigrees . in @xcite , we considered models for sequences evolving on pedigrees , and showed that for certain simple markov models , pedigrees are not identifiable from the distribution of observed states at extant vertices . we did construct examples of processes for which pedigrees could be proved to be identifiable , but the processes lacked the markovian property , which informally states that the state observed at a vertex depends only on the states of its parents . moreover , it seems that pedigrees that are difficult to reconstruct in a purely combinatorial framework ( e.g. , from pairwise distances between extant vertices or from subpedigrees ) are also likely to be difficult to reconstruct in a stochastic framework . for example , if a pedigree can not be reconstructed from its proper subpedigrees , then the marginal distributions of extant sequences on proper subsets of the extant population might be insufficient to uniquely recover the pedigree . on the other hand , negative results in a combinatorial setting may not imply non - identifiability in a stochastic framework . it is therefore important to study combinatorial reconstruction problems ( e.g. , classification of pedigrees that may be difficult to reconstruct combinatorially ) , stochastic identifiability problems for idealised markov models of recombination and mutation , and relationships between these problems . reconstruction problems of purely combinatorial nature are well known to combinatorialists , the foremost among such problems being the vertex reconstruction conjecture @xcite . the conjecture states that all simple undirected unlabelled graphs can be constructed from their collection of unlabelled induced subgraphs . combinatorial reconstruction problems have also been studied in phylogenetics , for example , problems of reconstructing phylogenetic trees from subtrees @xcite . steel and chang proved their phylogenetic identifiability results in two parts : computation of the additive ` log determinant ' function on pairs of leaves from the joint probability distribution on leaf states , and the combinatorial problem of reconstructing a tree from the additive function , which had been solved by buneman and zarecki . similarly the problem of reconstructing pedigrees under a recombination - mutation model may be solved in two parts : in the first part , we would like to reduce the identifiability question to an appropriate combinatorial reconstruction problem , and then in the second part we would like to show that the combinatorial reconstruction problem has a unique solution . to ensure the uniqueness of reconstruction , we will have to compute sufficiently strong combinatorial invariants of the pedigree from the joint distribution of extant sequences . although we noted that distances between extant vertices in a pedigree are not sufficient to reconstruct a pedigree , we sketch a heuristic argument given in @xcite that shows how the distances between extant vertices in a discrete generation pedigree may be obtained from sequence data . suppose @xmath7 and @xmath8 are two extant individuals in a pedigree . suppose further that in the pedigree there are @xmath9 pairs of paths such that one of the paths in each pair ends on @xmath7 and the other ends on @xmath8 , and the two paths in each pair start at a common ancestor of @xmath7 and @xmath8 in the @xmath10-th generation , and the two paths in a pair do not share any other vertex . now if sufficiently many short recombination - free homologous segments of dna of @xmath7 and @xmath8 are compared , then we would expect about @xmath11 of them to have a common ancestor in the @xmath10-th generation . thus it may be possible to estimate @xmath12 . such calculations are theoretically possible for small values of @xmath10 assuming the population is large and the sequences are long . they then tried to use the numbers @xmath12 for all pairs @xmath13 for all @xmath10 to construct the pedigree . they computationally found many pairs of non - isomorphic pedigrees that have the same number of pairs of paths of each length . one such example is the pair of pedigrees shown in figure [ fig - hap ] , which was also mentioned in @xcite . but a more detailed analysis of sequence similarities ( between multiple sequences , if required ) under simple recombination and mutation models may give us more information than just pairwise distances between living individuals . in the main theorem of this paper ( theorem [ thm - paths ] ) , we show that the joint distribution on extant sequences determines a class of combinatorial invariants ( e.g. , certain types of subgraph sequences ) that supersedes pairwise distances between extant sequences and subtrees ( genealogical trees ) in a pedigree . we then show that pedigrees , such as the ones in figure [ fig - hap ] , that earlier seemed difficult to distinguish due to their combinatorial similarities ( including the non - reconstructible pedigrees constructed in @xcite ) are distinguished by the class of invariants . this paper is organised as follows . in section [ sec - prelim ] , we define pedigrees , alignments and subgraph sequences . in section [ sec - models ] , we give a schematic description of the recombination process , and formalise three models for sequences : model r ( a model in which there are recombinations but no mutations ) , model rm ( a model in which there are recombinations and mutations ) , and model m ( a model of mutations for sequences evolving on trees ) . we then formulate identifiability problems for these models . in section [ sec - model - r ] , we analyse pedigrees with two generations under model r. in section [ sec - model - rm ] , we prove the main theorem ( theorem [ thm - paths ] ) and demonstrate its applications . in the last section , we discuss a few open questions . a section on nomenclature follows the references where all symbols appearing in the paper and the number of the page on which they appear first are listed . we use the following notation for number systems and their subsets : @xmath14 for the set of integers , @xmath15 for the set of positive integers , @xmath16 for natural numbers , @xmath17 $ ] for the set @xmath18 . depending on the context , we write @xmath19 $ ] for the set of integers @xmath20 or real numbers @xmath21 ( and similarly @xmath22 , @xmath23 and @xmath24 $ ] for open or half - open intervals in integers and reals ) . the set of all @xmath10-tuples of elements of a set @xmath25 is written as @xmath26\}$ ] . the set of all functions from @xmath27 to @xmath25 is written as @xmath28 . next we introduce some graph theoretic notation . the vertex set and the edge set of a graph @xmath29 are denoted by @xmath30 and @xmath31 , respectively , and their cardinalities by @xmath32 and @xmath33 , respectively . the in - degree and the out - degree of a vertex @xmath34 in a directed graph are denoted by @xmath35 and @xmath36 , respectively . the degree of a vertex @xmath34 in an undirected graph ( or the total degree in a directed graph ) is denoted by @xmath37 . an arc from @xmath34 to @xmath38 in a directed graph and also an edge between @xmath34 and @xmath38 in an undirected graph is written as @xmath39 , and it will be understood from the context whether @xmath39 is meant to be a ( directed ) arc or an ( undirected ) edge . when any two objects @xmath40 and @xmath41 are isomorphic , we write @xmath42 . the isomorphism class of an object @xmath29 is written as @xmath43 . for a collection @xmath44 of labelled objects , we write @xmath45 for the set of isomorphism classes of objects in @xmath44 . let @xmath29 and @xmath46 be two directed or undirected graphs . we write @xmath47 ( or @xmath48 ) if @xmath29 is isomorphic to a subgraph of @xmath46 , and this notation may be used when @xmath29 or @xmath46 is unlabelled ( i.e. , they are just isomorphism classes ) . we write @xmath49 ( or @xmath50 ) when a labelled graph @xmath29 is a subgraph ( or a supergraph ) of a labelled graph @xmath46 . [ defn - general ] a _ general pedigree _ @xmath51 of a set @xmath27 is a directed acyclic graph on a vertex set @xmath52 and a set of arcs @xmath53 such that each vertex has in - degree 0 or 2 . the set @xmath27 is the set of vertices with out - degree 0 . the set @xmath54 is the set of vertices with in - degree 0 . the vertices in @xmath27 are called the _ extant vertices _ ( or the extant individuals in the population ) . the vertices in @xmath54 are called the _ founder vertices _ ( or the founders of the population ) . the _ order _ of the pedigree is @xmath55 . the _ depth _ of a pedigree is the length of ( i.e. , the number of arcs in ) a longest path in the pedigree . two pedigrees @xmath51 and @xmath56 are said to be _ isomorphic _ if there is a one - one map @xmath57 such that @xmath39 is an arc in @xmath58 if and only if @xmath59 is an arc in @xmath60 , and @xmath61 for all @xmath62 . we denote the natural partial order on @xmath63 by @xmath64 , i.e. , @xmath65 if there is a directed path from @xmath34 to @xmath38 ( or @xmath66 ) . we define isomorphism only between pedigrees of the same set of extant individuals and require that it fixes all extant vertices because ( informally speaking ) we would like to treat extant vertices to be labelled and other vertices to be unlabelled . throughout this paper , we will assume that all pedigrees have @xmath27 as their set of extant vertices . [ defn - diploid ] let @xmath51 be a pedigree . suppose that @xmath63 can be partitioned into unordered pairs of vertices such that the following conditions hold : the extant vertices are paired with extant vertices and the founder vertices are paired with founder vertices ; two non - extant vertices @xmath38 and @xmath67 are paired if and only if there are arcs @xmath68 and @xmath69 in @xmath53 ; no two paired vertices have a common parent . then @xmath58 together with one such pairing is called a _ diploid pedigree_. thus any general pedigree is a _ haploid pedigree _ ; a diploid pedigree is a haploid pedigree with a pairing of its vertices ( although not all pedigrees admit such a pairing ) . the pairing in a diploid pedigree is completely determined by the pairing of its extant vertices since all other pairs are determined by the definition . an advantage of a purely combinatorial definition of a diploid pedigree is that we can now assign just one sequence to each vertex . from this point of view , haploid pedigrees are pedigrees of sequences , not of individuals . pedigrees of individuals are diploid pedigrees obtained by pairing sequences in a haploid pedigree . figure [ fig - d2h ] illustrates this point of view . when vertices ( sequences ) @xmath70 and @xmath71 are paired , @xmath72 and @xmath73 must be paired , since they are parents of @xmath70 ; similarly , @xmath74 and @xmath75 must be paired . [ defn - char ] let @xmath76 be a finite set ( called an _ alphabet _ ) and @xmath63 a finite set . a _ character _ on @xmath63 is a map @xmath77 . for @xmath78 , an _ alignment _ of length @xmath79 on @xmath63 is a map @xmath80 . equivalently , an alignment is an @xmath79-tuple @xmath81 of characters on @xmath63 , or a two dimensional array of symbols from @xmath5 , with @xmath82 rows and @xmath79 columns . the rows of the array are called _ sequences _ , and are written as @xmath83 , @xmath84 to @xmath82 . individual entries in the array are written as @xmath85 , where @xmath84 to @xmath82 and @xmath86 to @xmath79 . the columns of an alignment are called _ usually @xmath63 will be the set of vertices of a pedigree , and we will be interested in alignments restricted to the set @xmath27 of extant vertices of the pedigree . the space of characters on @xmath27 is @xmath87 , which is also referred to as the space of _ site patterns_. the set of alignments of length @xmath79 on a set @xmath27 is @xmath88 , which we write as @xmath89 . let @xmath51 be a pedigree and let @xmath90 be an alignment on @xmath58 . if the sequences in @xmath91 have evolved under some process of recombination or mutation , then ( regardless of the details of the model of recombination or mutation ) we may suppose that each site in each sequence is inherited only from one of the two parent sequences . therefore , for each @xmath92 and each @xmath93 $ ] , there is a unique directed path @xmath94 from some founder vertex @xmath95 to @xmath34 that defines the genetic ancestry of @xmath96 . therefore , each site @xmath97 has associated with it a spanning forest @xmath98 , and each alignment of length @xmath79 has an underlying ( usually unknown ) sequence @xmath99 of spanning forests . similarly , each site @xmath97 has associated with it a _ directed subforest _ defined by @xmath100 , and we have a _ directed subforest sequence _ @xmath101 of the alignment . here we define these notions purely graph theoretically ( without reference to alignments or models ) . [ defn - xtree ] let @xmath27 be a finite set . a _ directed @xmath27-forest _ @xmath102 is a directed forest that satisfies the following conditions : the set of vertices with out - degree 0 is @xmath27 , and is called the _ leaf set _ of @xmath102 ; each component has a single vertex of in - degree 0 , called the _ root vertex _ of the component , and all other vertices have in - degree 1 ; all arcs are directed away from the root vertices . undirected @xmath27-forest _ is an unrooted forest with leaf set @xmath27 . suppose @xmath102 is a directed @xmath27-forest . it induces a natural partition of @xmath27 into _ maximal clusters _ @xmath103 such that vertices in cluster @xmath104 have a unique most recent common ancestor ( mrca ) @xmath105 in @xmath102 . we construct a subgraph of @xmath102 induced by @xmath106 $ ] and their descendants in @xmath102 , and then replace its ( directed ) arcs by ( undirected ) edges . the resulting undirected unrooted graph is called the _ undirected @xmath27-forest _ of @xmath102 , written as @xmath107 . it is the maximal undirected @xmath27-forest contained in @xmath102 . in the above definition , the term _ @xmath27-forest _ is meant to be analogous to the term _ @xmath27-tree _ that is commonly used in phylogenetics @xcite . in this paper we will adapt some of the phylogenetic identifiability results for undirected @xmath27-forests that appear as undirected graphs underlying subgraphs of pedigrees . therefore , in the following definition , we specialise the terms for pedigrees . [ defn - subtree ] let @xmath58 be a pedigree . a _ spanning forest _ of @xmath58 is a spanning subgraph @xmath29 of @xmath58 such that the in - degree of each vertex in @xmath29 is 1 unless it is a founder vertex in @xmath58 . a _ directed @xmath27-forest _ of @xmath58 is a subgraph @xmath102 of @xmath58 such that @xmath102 is a directed @xmath27-forest and the root vertex of each component of @xmath102 is a founder vertex in @xmath58 . each spanning forest @xmath29 in @xmath58 contains a unique directed @xmath27-forest of @xmath58 , and we denote it by @xmath108 . an _ undirected @xmath27-forest _ in @xmath58 is the unique undirected @xmath27-forest in any directed @xmath27-forest in @xmath58 . each spanning forest @xmath29 in @xmath58 contains a unique undirected @xmath27-forest of @xmath58 , and we denote it by @xmath109 . note that we use the term _ spanning forest _ in a specific sense : a spanning forest is not any spanning forest in the graph theoretic sense . we illustrate these terms in figure [ fig - subtrees ] , which shows a pedigree and a spanning forest @xmath29 with @xmath110 ( shown by bold arcs ) . in this example , the unique directed @xmath27-forest @xmath108 in @xmath29 has the arc set @xmath111 ; its clusters are @xmath112 and @xmath113 , and the root vertices of its components are @xmath114 and @xmath4 . the unique undirected @xmath27-forest @xmath109 in @xmath29 consists of vertex set @xmath115 and edge set @xmath116 . note that vertex 3 is isolated in @xmath109 since it is the mrca of its cluster , but we need it in our analysis . two ( directed or undirected ) @xmath27-forests @xmath102 and @xmath117 are said to be _ isomorphic _ ( written @xmath118 ) if there is a graph theoretic isomorphism @xmath119 from @xmath102 to @xmath117 such that @xmath61 for all @xmath120 in @xmath27 . the isomorphism class of a directed or an undirected @xmath27-forest @xmath102 , denoted by @xmath121 , is the set of all @xmath27-forests @xmath117 that are isomorphic to @xmath102 . the set of all directed @xmath27-forests of @xmath58 is denoted by @xmath122 . the set of isomorphism classes of directed @xmath27-forests of @xmath58 ( or the set of _ distinct _ directed @xmath27-forests in @xmath58 ) is denoted by @xmath123 . the set of spanning forests of a pedigree @xmath58 is denoted by @xmath124 . the set of undirected @xmath27-forests of @xmath58 is denoted by @xmath125 . the set of isomorphism classes of undirected @xmath27-forests of @xmath58 ( or the set of _ distinct _ undirected @xmath27-forests in @xmath58 ) is denoted by @xmath126 . [ prop - spanning - forests ] each spanning forest of a pedigree @xmath58 has @xmath127 arcs and contains exactly one directed @xmath27-forest . there are @xmath128 spanning forests . each directed @xmath27-forest @xmath102 is contained in @xmath129 spanning forests . each spanning forest of @xmath58 is obtained by selecting one of the two arcs that point to each non - founder vertex . the unique directed @xmath27-forest @xmath102 in a spanning forest @xmath29 is the subgraph of @xmath29 spanned by vertices in @xmath29 that are ancestral in @xmath29 to the extant vertices . finally , @xmath130 is the number of arcs not pointing to vertices in @xmath102 , therefore , @xmath131 is the number of non - founder vertices outside @xmath102 , at each of which we can choose one of the two incoming arcs to construct a spanning forest containing @xmath102 . in any model of recombination , the number of recombination events is determined by the spanning forest sequence underlying an alignment , but we define it for all spanning forest sequences without reference to alignments or models . [ def - rg - sg ] let @xmath58 be a pedigree and let @xmath132 be a spanning forest sequence in @xmath58 . if @xmath68 and @xmath69 are distinct arcs in @xmath58 such that @xmath68 is in @xmath133 and @xmath69 is in @xmath134 , then we say that a recombination has occurred at site @xmath135 at vertex @xmath34 or that @xmath135 is a recombining site . if @xmath68 is an arc in @xmath133 and @xmath134 then we say that there is no recombination at @xmath34 at site @xmath135 . we define the number of recombinations in @xmath136 to be @xmath137 where @xmath138 is the number of recombinations separating @xmath133 and @xmath134 . the number of points of no recombination is @xmath139 the directed @xmath27-forest sequence of @xmath136 is the sequence @xmath140 , and the undirected @xmath27-forest sequence of @xmath136 is the sequence @xmath141 . we assume that in any reasonable model of sequence evolution , sequences are first assigned to the founder vertices , and then subsequent generations of individuals inherit their sequences from their parents sequences subject to recombinations and mutations . we are then interested in the following types of _ identifiability _ questions . [ problem - main ] suppose sequences of equal length over a finite alphabet are assigned to the founder vertices of a pedigree . the sequences then evolve on the pedigree undergoing recombinations and mutations , giving a probability distribution on the space of alignments on the set of extant vertices . can we determine the pedigree uniquely ( i.e. , up to isomorphism ) - with or without the knowledge of the size or the depth of the pedigree or the various probability parameters defining the recombination and mutation processes , with or without restrictions such as discrete generations or constant population , and so on ? in the case of diploid pedigrees , we will be given the distribution on alignments on the set of extant vertices along with a pairing of extant vertices . in this paper , we study the above types of questions under two simple models of recombination and mutation . in _ , we assume that sequences evolve on a pedigrees under a process of recombinations without mutations . in _ model rm _ , we assume that sequences evolving on a pedigree undergo recombinations and mutations . for convenience , we also formalise the mutation part of model rm for the spanning forests of pedigrees and in general for directed @xmath27-forests , and call it _ model m_. in all these models , we assume that first all the founder vertices of a pedigree ( or the root vertices of a spanning forest or a directed @xmath27-forest ) are assigned sequences . these sequences are independently selected from a uniform distribution on @xmath142 , where @xmath76 is a known finite alphabet . then the sequences evolve on the pedigree ( or a spanning forest or a directed @xmath27-forest ) in a top - down manner , i.e. , a vertex is assigned a sequence only after its parents have been assigned sequences . we begin with a schematic description of the recombination process . our description is largely based on chapter 12 of @xcite . figure [ fig - meio ] schematically shows the process of gamete ( sperm or egg ) formation in eukaryotes . initially there is a parent cell with one pair of homologous non - sex chromosomes . each chromosome is then duplicated with the identical sister _ chromatids _ joined together at the _ centromere _ , forming a _ four - strand bundle_. then the two duplicated chromosomes exchange material between _ chiasmata _ ( _ recombination points _ ) . in the diagram , there are three recombination events . the first recombination is between strands 1 and 3 ( counted from top to bottom ) , the second is between strands 2 and 4 , and the third is between strands 2 and 3 . the four chromatids after the exchange of material are shown next . then the cell undergoes two cell divisions to create four haploid gametes , each receiving one of the four chromosomes . as shown in the diagram , at each recombination point a crossover occurs between one strand from the first pair and one strand from the second pair . at each crossover , a strand from the first pair and a strand from the second pair are chosen randomly with equal probability ( independent of other chiasma ) . this independence property is known as the lack of _ chromatid interference_. suppose that the locations of recombinations are modelled as a poisson point process along the sequence ( or on @xmath143 ) with the rate @xmath144 or a bernoulli process with probability @xmath145 ( so that a crossover occurs after a site on a sequence with probability @xmath145 independently of other sites or sequences ) . since exactly two of the four gametes - one from the first pair and one from the second pair - inherit any recombination , any given gamete inherits a recombination with probability @xmath146 . therefore , for the sequence of any fixed gamete , the locations of recombinations are still modelled by a poisson process , but with the rate @xmath147 , ( or bernoulli process with probability @xmath148 ) . therefore , a model may be formalised with just two parent sequences instead of four . a poisson process for the locations of chiasmata was first proposed in @xcite . based on the above description , we formalise models r and rm , in which we assume that crossovers in a finite sequence occur according to a bernoulli process . _ model r : _ consider three sequences @xmath83 of length @xmath79 over alphabet @xmath5 , where @xmath149 and @xmath38 and @xmath67 are parents of @xmath34 . the sequence @xmath150 is obtained by recombining sequences @xmath151 and @xmath152 as follows . let @xmath153 be a markov chain on the state space @xmath154 with transition probabilities @xmath155 if @xmath156 for @xmath157 , and @xmath158 . then , for @xmath159 , @xmath160 if @xmath161 . thus @xmath162 indicates a crossover from one sequence to the other . we refer to this model as _ model r_. _ model rm : _ consider three sequences @xmath83 of length @xmath79 over alphabet @xmath5 , where @xmath149 and @xmath38 and @xmath67 are parents of @xmath34 . the sequence @xmath150 is obtained from the sequences @xmath151 and @xmath152 by a process of recombinations and mutations as follows . let @xmath153 be a markov chain on the state space @xmath154 with transition probabilities @xmath155 if @xmath156 for @xmath157 , and @xmath163 . then if @xmath164 and @xmath165 , then @xmath166 is assigned @xmath1 with probability @xmath167 , and @xmath166 is assigned a state different from @xmath1 with probability @xmath168 . when a state different from @xmath1 is assigned to @xmath166 , each state in @xmath169 has equal probability @xmath170 of being assigned to @xmath166 . we refer to this process as _ model rm_. _ model m : _ this process is defined for spanning forests of a pedigree and directed @xmath27-forests . first each founder or the root vertex in each component of a directed @xmath27-forest is assigned independently and uniformly randomly a state from @xmath5 . suppose @xmath97 is the parent vertex of @xmath135 in a spanning forest of a pedigree or in a directed @xmath27-forest . let @xmath83 and @xmath171 be the sequences of @xmath135 and @xmath97 , respectively , both of equal length @xmath79 over alphabet @xmath5 . then for each @xmath172 $ ] , @xmath173 is assigned the same state as @xmath174 with probability @xmath167 , and @xmath173 is assigned a state different from @xmath174 with probability @xmath168 . when a state different from @xmath174 is assigned to @xmath173 , each state in @xmath175 has equal probability @xmath170 of being assigned to @xmath173 . we refer to this process as _ model m_. model m on a directed @xmath27-forest @xmath102 is equivalent to a similarly formulated model on the undirected @xmath27-forest of @xmath102 . we root each component of the undirected @xmath27-forest arbitrarily , and assign to it a state from @xmath5 uniformly randomly , independent of the roots of other components . the state then evolves away from the root in each component . if a component itself is an isolated vertex , it is simply assigned a state from @xmath5 uniformly randomly . since the mutation model described here is reversible , the same distribution on the site patterns is observed on @xmath27 in the undirected @xmath27-forest as in a directed @xmath27-forest for a given @xmath170 . therefore , when we try to construct a tree from the character distribution on its leaves , we can not construct the directed @xmath27-forest , but we can at best construct the undirected @xmath27-forest in it . therefore , we will consider model m only on undirected @xmath27-forests . thus model rm may be thought of as a synthesis of models r and m so that the recombination - free segments of sequences evolving on a pedigree may be examined under model m with phylogenetic methods . let @xmath58 be a pedigree on @xmath27 . for an alignment @xmath176 , we denote by @xmath177 the probability that sequences of length @xmath79 evolving on the pedigree @xmath58 under model @xmath178 give an alignment @xmath91 on @xmath27 . we use analogous notation when the model @xmath178 is replaced by the model @xmath179 , or when the pedigree @xmath58 is replaced by a directed or an undirected @xmath27-forest @xmath102 and the model under consideration is the mutation model @xmath180 . we denote the various probability spaces by @xmath181 , @xmath182 , @xmath183 , @xmath184 , and so on . for pedigrees @xmath58 and @xmath60 , we will write @xmath185 when @xmath186 for all @xmath187 , and analogously for other models . as in the case of alignments , we treat the spaces of spanning forest sequences , directed @xmath27-forest sequences , and undirected @xmath27-forest sequences as probability spaces , and denote them by @xmath188 , @xmath189 , and @xmath190 , respectively . the spanning forest sequences , and directed and undirected @xmath27-forest sequences , ( and the corresponding sequences of isomorphism classes of spanning forests and directed and undirected @xmath27-forests ) are defined by only the recombination events , therefore , the probability spaces are unchanged if @xmath179 is replaced by @xmath178 . for a spanning forest sequence @xmath191 , we will write @xmath192 for the probability of @xmath193 in the probability space @xmath194 . we will use analogous notation for other sequences and probability spaces . unless stated otherwise , when we will refer to alignments or sequences of spanning forests or other objects , we will mean alignments or sequences of spanning forests or other objects , respectively , from the appropriate probability spaces that are clear in the context . [ def - identifiability ] nonisomorphic pedigrees @xmath58 and @xmath60 in a class @xmath195 are said to be distinguished from each other under model @xmath178 if @xmath196 for some @xmath79 , ( i.e. , for some @xmath79 , there exists @xmath197 such that @xmath198 ) . a pedigree @xmath58 in a class @xmath195 is said to be identifiable under model @xmath178 if it is distinguished from every other pedigree @xmath60 in @xmath195 , ( i.e. , if there is a pedigree @xmath60 in @xmath195 such that @xmath199 for all @xmath200 , then @xmath60 is isomorphic to @xmath58 ) . pedigrees in a class @xmath195 are said to be identifiable under model @xmath178 if all pairs of pedigrees in @xmath195 are distinguished from each other under model @xmath178 . similar terminology will be used for other models and for undirected @xmath27-forests . stronger notions of identifiability may be defined , and correspondingly stronger variants of identifiability questions may be asked . the above definitions assume the model parameters to be fixed . but we may ask if there are nonisomorphic pedigrees @xmath58 and @xmath60 and model parameters @xmath201 such that @xmath202 for all @xmath203 . given the probability distribution a pedigree induces on the space of alignments , we may ask if the pedigree can be recognised to be in a class @xmath195 . we assume in all results in this paper that the model parameters and the class @xmath195 ( typically defined by the size of a pedigree ) to be fixed ( but possibly unknown ) . pedigrees of order 1 are in general not identifiable since for all pedigrees of order 1 , the extant sequence will be uniformly distributed . in fact for all pedigrees , all extant sequences will be uniformly distributed . but when there are more than one extant vertices , the joint distribution of extant sequences will contain some information about the pedigree on which they have evolved , because , for example , some vertices may have common ancestors , so their sequences will be correlated . we will therefore consider identifiability questions for pedigrees of order more than 1 . the models r and rm on a pedigree @xmath58 with @xmath204 arcs may be interpreted as hidden markov models with the set of hidden states @xmath124 and the set of observed states @xmath87 . this is illustrated in figure [ fig - chains ] . the initial probability for each hidden state is @xmath205 . the probability of an observed state conditional on a given hidden state @xmath206 can be easily computed ( and actually depends only on @xmath109 and @xmath170 ) . the probability of transition from state @xmath133 to @xmath207 is given by @xmath208 in most contexts in which hmms are used , one assumes that the set of hidden states in known , but here we do not know the set @xmath124 . we also note that the sequence of @xmath27-forests is not a markov chain . consider directed @xmath27-forests @xmath209 and @xmath210 at sites @xmath97 and @xmath211 , respectively . suppose a vertex @xmath34 in @xmath212 has parents @xmath38 and @xmath67 in the pedigree . the probability that the arc @xmath68 is in @xmath210 depends on the history before the @xmath97-th site . for example , if @xmath68 was in @xmath213 then the probability that it would also be in @xmath210 is @xmath214 . but if @xmath68 was not in @xmath213 the probability that it would be in @xmath210 is @xmath215 . therefore , @xmath216 is not a markov chain , i.e. , @xmath217 may not be the same as @xmath218 if the sequences @xmath219 and @xmath220 are different . therefore , we can not interpret the models as hmms with directed or undirected @xmath27-forests as hidden states . of characters at the extant vertices of a pedigree @xmath58 . among the intermediate chains , only @xmath221 is a markov chain.,width=445 ] in this section , we analyse diploid pedigrees and certain haploid pedigrees that obey many properties of diploid pedigrees under model @xmath222 . we show that , with some exceptions and mild conditions on @xmath145 and @xmath223 , diploid pedigrees of depth 2 are reconstructible from the probability distribution on the alignments on extant vertices . we use very basic techniques such as pairwise comparisons between extant sequences to exploit the correlation between them to reconstruct their pedigree . let @xmath58 be a pedigree and let @xmath102 be an undirected @xmath27-forest . we define @xmath224 . [ prop - ngt ] let @xmath58 be a pedigree with @xmath204 arcs . let @xmath225 be any character . then the probability that the @xmath10-th character in an alignment is @xmath226 is given by @xmath227 in particular , it does not depend on @xmath10 . let @xmath228 be a spanning forest sequence . it is a time - homogeneous markov chain on @xmath124 , with transition probabilities given by @xmath229 it follows that @xmath230 for all @xmath231 . let @xmath232 be a sequence of characters . then , under model rm , @xmath233 & = & \sum_{g \in { \mathcal{g}}_p } { \mathtt{pr}}\{c_k = c\mid g_k = g\ } { \mathtt{pr}}\{g_k = g { \mid}p , rm(p,\mu)\ } \nonumber \\[2 mm ] & = & \frac{1}{2^e}\sum_{g \in { \mathcal{g}}_p } { \mathtt{pr}}\{c_k = c\mid g_k = g\ } \nonumber \\[2 mm ] & = & \sum_{t \in \lvert { \mathcal{u}}_p \rvert } \frac{n(g > t : p)}{2^e } { \mathtt{pr}}\{c\mid t , m(\mu)\}. \nonumber \end{aligned}\ ] ] a similar result holds when model rm is replaced by model r. the above proposition implies that if two pedigrees have the same number of undirected @xmath27-forests of each type and the same number of arcs , then the character frequencies in alignments alone are not sufficient to distinguish the two pedigrees . for example , pedigrees in figure [ fig - hap ] can not be easily distinguished . but it turns out that , under model r , most diploid pedigrees of depth 2 are easily distinguished by making pairwise comparisons between extant sequences and computing the probability that they agree at a site . the above proposition implies that the probability that two sequences in an alignment agree at a site @xmath10 does not depend on @xmath10 in models r and rm . moreover , such a probability can be computed easily under model r. any given undirected @xmath27-forest @xmath102 of a pedigree induces a partition of its leaves so that the leaves within a component are in the same part . under model r , the probability that the sequences at two leaves @xmath135 and @xmath97 are in the same state at a site is 1 if they are in the same component of @xmath102 . otherwise , the probability is @xmath234 . under model rm , the probability depends on @xmath170 if they are in the same component , and is @xmath234 otherwise . [ prop-2seq ] let @xmath58 be a diploid pedigree of depth 2 . let @xmath235 . then the subpedigree of @xmath135 and @xmath97 is determined by the probability distribution induced on @xmath236 under model r. there are four possible ways in which any two vertices @xmath135 and @xmath97 are related in a diploid pedigree , which are shown in figure [ fig - grand ] . for each of them , we give the probability that the sequences @xmath70 and @xmath72 match at any site @xmath10 . in the following , we set @xmath237 . and @xmath97 may be related , width=445 ] _ case 1 : _ if @xmath135 and @xmath97 have the same parents , then @xmath238 . _ case 2 : _ if @xmath135 and @xmath97 have distinct pairs of parents but the same grand parents , then @xmath239 . _ case 3 : _ if @xmath135 and @xmath97 have distinct pairs of parents but exactly one pair of grand parents in common , then @xmath240 . _ case 4 : _ if @xmath135 and @xmath97 have no common parents or grand parents , then @xmath241 . therefore , unless @xmath242 , the above cases are distinguished by the marginal joint distribution on @xmath236 under model r. the assumption that @xmath58 is a diploid pedigree is essential . it implies that @xmath135 and @xmath97 are not related as in the haploid pedigree @xmath243 shown in figure [ fig - hap ] . we can verify that @xmath244 for both @xmath245 and @xmath243 , so they are indistinguishable by the above method , which was also pointed out as a consequence of proposition [ prop - ngt ] . the above probabilities do not depend on @xmath145 , therefore , we have a slightly stronger identifiability statement : if diploid pedigrees @xmath58 and @xmath60 of depth 2 and crossover probabilities @xmath145 and @xmath246 are such that @xmath247 then their subpedigrees of order 2 are correspondingly isomorphic . [ prop - n2 - 1 ] when @xmath248 , pedigrees of depth 2 in which no two vertices have exactly one common parent are identifiable under model r. in particular , when @xmath248 , diploid pedigrees of depth 2 are identifiable under model r. there are only 4 ways in which any two extant vertices @xmath135 and @xmath97 are related . they are illustrated in figure [ fig - grand ] . each of the possible relationships is recognised by proposition [ prop-2seq ] . we denote the 3rd and the 4th types of relationships by @xmath249 and @xmath250 , respectively . suppose that no two extant vertices @xmath251 in a pedigree are related to each other as @xmath249 or @xmath250 . then the pedigree is constructed by adding extant vertices one by one . on each step we add one extant vertex and join to previously added extant vertices as in figure [ fig - grand ] - ( i ) or ( ii ) , whichever is appropriate . therefore , we assume that at least two extant vertices @xmath252 are related as @xmath249 or @xmath250 . let @xmath253 be a ( nonempty ) maximal subset of @xmath27 such that for any two distinct extant vertices @xmath135 and @xmath97 in @xmath253 , either @xmath249 or @xmath254 . every other extant vertex @xmath10 not in @xmath253 is related to some vertex in @xmath253 as in figure [ fig - grand ] - ( i ) or ( ii ) . therefore , once the subpedigree of @xmath253 is constructed , there is only one way to extend it to the whole pedigree . to construct the subpedigree of @xmath253 , we first construct an edge labelled graph with edge set @xmath253 in which edges @xmath135 and @xmath97 are incident if and only if @xmath249 . this is a known problem in graph theory , namely , the problem of constructing an edge labelled graph from its line graph . it was proved @xcite that there are only 4 pairs @xmath255 of connected nonisomorphic edge labelled graphs that have the same line graphs . edge labelled graphs that can not be uniquely constructed from their line graphs must contain components isomorphic to @xmath133 or @xmath256 . we refer to @xcite ( in particular , chapter 15 , problem 1 ) for discussion about reconstructing graphs from their line graphs , in particular , for the complete list of pairs @xmath255 . the first pair is @xmath257 ( with edges of each of them labelled @xmath258 ) . based on the example @xmath257 , we construct pedigrees shown in figure [ fig - k3 ] , in which all pairs of extant vertices are similarly related . we distinguish the two pedigrees in figure [ fig - k3 ] by comparing the probabilities @xmath259 and @xmath260 for any site @xmath2 . in @xmath261 , there are 512 spanning forests . among them there are 192 spanning forests in which two extant vertices have a common grandparent , giving the first term on the rhs below . in the remaining 320 spanning forests , no two extant vertices have a common grandparent , which explains the second term on the rhs below . therefore , @xmath262 in @xmath263 , there are 512 spanning forests . among them there are 16 spanning forests in which @xmath258 have a common grandparent ( giving the first term on the rhs below ) , 144 spanning forests in which two extant vertices have a common grandparent at site @xmath2 ( giving the second term ) , and 352 spanning forests in which @xmath258 have distinct grandparents at site @xmath2 ( giving the third term ) . therefore , @xmath264 whenever @xmath248 , @xmath265 , therefore , @xmath261 and @xmath263 can be distinguished . the two expressions are equal when @xmath266 . similarly , other pedigrees constructed from @xmath267 are distinguished when @xmath248 . since there are only two types of site patterns for three sequences when @xmath266 ( either the three sequences agree at a site or exactly two of them agree ) , the two cases can not be distinguished by considering other site pattern probabilities . in diploid pedigrees , no two vertices have exactly one common parent , therefore , when @xmath248 , they are identifiable under model r. we used only site pattern probabilities in the above proofs . but because of recombinations , consecutive sites in an alignment are not independent . we use the dependence between sites to eliminate the restriction @xmath248 when the crossover probability @xmath145 is sufficiently small . [ prop - n2 - 2 ] when @xmath266 and @xmath145 is sufficiently small , haploid pedigrees @xmath261 and @xmath263 ( shown in figure [ fig - k3 ] ) are distinguished under model @xmath179 . we compute the probability that , in an alignment @xmath91 , there are long runs of sites at which all the three sequences @xmath70 , @xmath72 and @xmath74 are equal . in particular , we compute bounds on @xmath268\}$ ] on the two pedigrees . for @xmath261 , for any fixed @xmath269 , if any two of the three sites @xmath270 are inherited from the same grand parent , then @xmath271 , and if all of them are inherited from distinct grandparents , then @xmath272 is 1/4 . therefore , @xmath273 { \mid}p_2,r(p ) \ } \leq ( 1/2)^{t+1}.\ ] ] for @xmath263 , the probability that the first site of all sequences is inherited from a common grand parent is 1/32 . the probability that at each successive site the three sequences have a common grand parent is @xmath274 . therefore , @xmath275 { \mid}q_2,r(p ) \ } \nonumber \\[2 mm ] & \geq & \frac{\left((1-p)^6+p^3(1-p)^3\right)^t}{32}. \end{aligned}\ ] ] when @xmath145 is sufficiently small and @xmath276 is sufficiently large , the above probability for @xmath263 is more than that for @xmath261 . we do not analyse other examples of pedigrees based on graphs that are not reconstructible from their line graphs ( graphs @xmath277 mentioned in proposition [ prop - n2 - 1 ] ) , but they may be analysed similarly . in this section we develop ideas from section [ sec - model - r ] ( especially proposition [ prop - n2 - 2 ] ) in much more generality . earlier we observed that parts of alignments that are free of recombination may be analysed with phylogenetic methods . since we do not know where the recombinations have occurred in an alignment , we choose long segments of carefully chosen alignments ( or sets of alignments ) and show that they have higher probability of having evolved on one particular @xmath27-forest ( or a sequence of @xmath27-forests ) than any other @xmath27-forest ( or a sequence of @xmath27-forests ) . for example , the method of proposition [ prop - n2 - 2 ] works because @xmath263 contains a tree in which @xmath258 have a common ancestor and @xmath261 does not contain such a tree . therefore , a sufficiently long sequence of characters in which sequences @xmath278 and @xmath279 are in the same state will more likely have evolved on a pedigree such as @xmath263 than on a pedigree that does not contain such a tree . this argument may be generalised to count the number of @xmath27-forests of each type from the distribution of extant sequences . such a generalisation requires identifiability results for phylogenetic trees , which we state in a form suitable for our application . in this section , we state known results on identifiability and statistical consistency of maximum likelihood reconstruction of phylogenetic trees . we need to adapt them slightly since the @xmath27-forests in a pedigree differ from phylogenetic trees in three respects - they may have vertices of degree 2 , they may be unresolved ( i.e. , they may have vertices of degree more than 3 ) , and they may be disconnected ( two extant vertices may not have a common ancestor in a given directed @xmath27-forest in a pedigree ) . we address them in the following identifiability result , which was originally proved for phylogenetic trees in @xcite in the @xmath266 case . identifiability and statistical consistency of maximum likelihood reconstruction of phylogenetic trees were independently proved in full generality for all @xmath280 in @xcite . [ thm - identifiability ] for all @xmath281 and any two undirected @xmath27-forests @xmath282 and @xmath283 with bounded number of edges , if @xmath284 for all characters @xmath285 then @xmath286 . the result follows from the analogous results in @xcite for phylogenetic @xmath27-trees , but we have to clarify three issues : unlike the phylogenetic @xmath27-trees , the @xmath27-forests as defined in this paper may be disconnected , unresolved , and may have vertices of degree 2 . _ connectivity : _ any two extant vertices @xmath287 and @xmath288 are in different components of @xmath282 and @xmath283 if and only if @xmath289 for all @xmath290 , where @xmath291 is the state at the extant vertex @xmath135 in a character @xmath226 . if @xmath135 and @xmath97 are in the same component , then @xmath292 can not be arbitrarily close to @xmath234 if the number of edges ( and hence the distance between @xmath135 and @xmath97 ) is bounded . therefore , we can consider the identifiability question for each component separately . _ unresolved @xmath27-forests : _ given an unresolved phylogenetic tree , there are resolved phylogenetic trees with site pattern probabilities arbitrarily close to the site pattern probabilities for the unresolved tree . therefore , even though unresolved phylogenetic @xmath27-trees are identifiable , statistical consistency of maximum likelihood methods requires that the substitution probabilities on the edges of a phylogenetic tree are bounded below by a positive real number . in our model , corollary [ cor - consistency ] below is possible because the substitution probability @xmath170 is fixed on each edge . _ vertices of degree 2 : _ let @xmath34 and @xmath38 be any two vertices of an @xmath27-forest . suppose that @xmath34 and @xmath38 are of degree 1 or more than 2 . suppose all internal vertices on the path between @xmath34 and @xmath38 have degree 2 . since @xmath170 is fixed for all arcs , the distance between @xmath34 and @xmath38 on a tree is determined by the substitution probability on the @xmath39 path . the substitution probability on the @xmath39 path is determined by the distribution on the space of characters . in the above result , if @xmath282 and @xmath283 were directed @xmath27-forests , then we would be able to conclude that @xmath293 . let @xmath294 . suppose that @xmath295 . we associate with each undirected @xmath27-forest @xmath102 a vector @xmath296 in @xmath297 , where @xmath298 . therefore , the condition @xmath299 for all characters @xmath225 may be equivalently written as @xmath300 . given @xmath301 and a point @xmath302 , let the open ball of radius @xmath1 centred at @xmath303 be denoted by @xmath304 . here the radius may be taken to be in the 1-norm ( i.e. , the distance between points @xmath305 and @xmath306 is defined by @xmath307 ) . let @xmath91 be an alignment on @xmath27 . we define a vector @xmath308 , where @xmath309 are the _ fractional site pattern frequencies _ , i.e. , @xmath309 is the fraction of columns of @xmath91 of type @xmath310 . then the above identifiability result implies a statistical consistency result for maximum likelihood . it informally says that as the length of a random alignment @xmath91 goes to infinity , we expect @xmath311 to be arbitrarily close to @xmath312 with probability approaching 1 if @xmath102 is the true @xmath27-forest , and that the probability that @xmath311 is arbitrarily close to @xmath312 approaches 0 if @xmath102 is not the true @xmath27-forest . [ cor - consistency ] for all @xmath313 , @xmath314 and @xmath315 , there exists @xmath316 such that for any two undirected @xmath27-forests @xmath102 and @xmath117 such that @xmath317 , and an alignment @xmath318 , @xmath319 and @xmath320 we give bounds on the above probabilities in terms of @xmath79 , which we prove using bernstein s inequality . [ lem - bernstein1 ] let @xmath321 be i.i.d . bernoulli random variables with @xmath322 . then for all @xmath323 and @xmath324 , @xmath325 and ( equivalently ) @xmath326 [ lem - eps - l1 ] let @xmath313 and @xmath281 . let @xmath327 . let @xmath102 be an undirected @xmath27-forest . then @xmath328 there are @xmath329 distinct characters , with probabilities @xmath330 , @xmath331 . if @xmath332 , then @xmath333 for some @xmath135 therefore , we apply bernstein s inequality to each distinct character , and write the probability that @xmath334 . we then apply the union bound to get the result . if we set @xmath335 it will ensure that the @xmath27-forests are _ separated _ by open balls of radius @xmath336 in the space of site pattern probability vectors , i.e. , the open balls @xmath337 and @xmath338 are non - intersecting whenever @xmath339 and @xmath209 are non - isomorphic . we will use this value of @xmath336 unless specified otherwise . now for an undirected @xmath27-forest @xmath339 , we define @xmath340 and @xmath341 by selecting a sufficiently large value of @xmath79 we can make @xmath342 arbitrarily small as in lemma [ lem - eps - l1 ] . moreover , if @xmath343 , then @xmath344 hence @xmath345 can be made arbitrarily small as per lemma [ lem - eps - l1 ] . we set @xmath346 , which depends on @xmath79 and @xmath336 . in theorem [ thm - paths ] ( particularly in the proof of inequality [ eq - term1a ] ) we require a concentration inequality similar to the inequality in lemma [ lem - eps - l1 ] for the situation in which @xmath79 sites of an alignment have evolved on an @xmath27-forest @xmath339 and @xmath347 sites ( for a small @xmath348 ) have evolved on another @xmath27-forest @xmath209 . ( we will keep the notation simple by assuming that @xmath347 is an integer . ) therefore , we give the following variants of lemmas [ lem - bernstein1 ] and [ lem - eps - l1 ] . [ lem - bernstein2 ] let @xmath349 be i.i.d . bernoulli random variables with @xmath350 . let @xmath351 be bernoulli random variables . let @xmath352 , where @xmath353 is a positive constant . let @xmath354 and @xmath355 and @xmath356 . if @xmath357 and @xmath358 , then @xmath359 since @xmath360 , we have @xmath361 & \implies & \left(\frac{s_n}{n(1+c ) } - p \leq -r\right ) \;\text{or}\ ; \left(\frac{s_n}{n(1+c ) } - p \geq r\right ) \\[1 mm ] & \implies & \left(\frac{\sum_{i=1}^n x_i}{n(1+c ) } - p \leq -r\right ) \;\text{or}\ ; \left(\frac{cn + \sum_{i=1}^n x_i}{n(1+c ) } - p \geq r\right ) \\[1 mm ] & \implies & \left(\frac{\sum_{i=1}^n x_i}{n(1+c ) } \leq p - r \leq m \right ) \;\text{or}\ ; \left(\frac{cn + \sum_{i=1}^n x_i}{n(1+c ) } \geq p+r \geq m \right ) \\[1 mm ] & \implies & \left(\frac{\sum_{i=1}^n x_i}{n(1+c)}-\frac{p}{1+c } \leq m-\frac{p}{1+c}\right ) \text{or}\ ; \left(\frac{cn + \sum_{i=1}^n x_i}{n(1+c ) } - \frac{p+c}{1+c } \geq m-\frac{p+c}{1+c } \right ) \\[1 mm ] & \implies & \left(\frac{\sum_{i=1}^n x_i}{n}-p \leq -r^\prime \right ) \;\text{or}\ ; \left(\frac{\sum_{i=1}^n x_i}{n}-p \geq r^{\prime\prime}\right ) . \end{aligned}\ ] ] now we apply bernstein s inequality ( lemma [ lem - bernstein2 ] ) to each term and obtain the desired bound . let @xmath91 be an alignment of length @xmath362 . suppose that @xmath79 characters of @xmath91 evolved on an undirected @xmath27-forest @xmath102 and the remaining characters evolved on undirected @xmath27-forests @xmath363 . the following lemma states that if @xmath353 is sufficiently small , then @xmath311 is concentrated near @xmath364 for large @xmath79 . moreover , as in lemma [ lem - eps - l1 ] , if we require @xmath311 to be sufficiently near @xmath364 with probability at least @xmath365 , then the length of the alignment @xmath362 must be @xmath366 . in the following lemma , we do not specify the constants @xmath367 and @xmath368 precisely , but they can be chosen depending on @xmath336 . [ lem - eps - l2 ] let @xmath313 and @xmath281 . let @xmath369 for a suitably chosen positive constant @xmath353 . let @xmath370 be undirected @xmath27-forest . then @xmath371 & \leq & \sum_i^{|\sigma|^{|x|}}\left(\exp \left\{\frac{-l(r_i^\prime)^2}{2p_i(1-p_i ) + 2r_i^\prime/3}\right\ } + \exp \left\{\frac{-l(r_i^{\prime\prime})^2 } { 2p_i(1-p_i ) + 2r_i^{\prime\prime}/3}\right\}\right ) , \end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath372 and @xmath368 are positive constants as in lemma [ lem - bernstein2 ] . we apply lemma [ lem - bernstein2 ] for each component of @xmath311 and use the union bound as in the proof of lemma [ lem - eps - l1 ] . for each component , we use @xmath373 as before . constants @xmath372 and @xmath368 ( and @xmath374 , which are implicit ) depend on @xmath336 and the probabilities @xmath330 , @xmath375 . the constant @xmath353 may be taken to be the smallest among @xmath376 . a hidden markov model ( hmm ) is defined by two sequences @xmath377 and @xmath378 of random variables . the sequence @xmath379 takes values in @xmath380 $ ] and is a stationary markov chain with transition matrix @xmath91 and initial distribution @xmath381 to @xmath1 , which is also the stationary distribution of the markov chain . the random variables @xmath378 take values in @xmath382 $ ] , and are independent and identically distributed conditional on @xmath379 . the distribution of @xmath383 depends only on @xmath384 . let @xmath385 be the @xmath386 matrix of conditional probabilities @xmath387 , where @xmath388 $ ] and @xmath389 $ ] . the sequence @xmath378 are the _ observations_. identifiable hidden markov models were characterised in @xcite , where a precise description of conditions on @xmath91 and @xmath385 for which the probability distribution on observed sequences determines @xmath91 and @xmath385 ( up to re - labelling of hidden states ) was given . here _ identifiability up to a re - labelling of hidden states _ means the following : if @xmath25 is an @xmath390 permutation matrix , then the hmm with parameters @xmath391 ( where @xmath119 is treated as a column vector of length @xmath1 ) is equivalent to ( induces the same distribution on the space sequences of observed states as ) the hmm with parameters @xmath392 . therefore , identifiability only means computing the matrices and the initial distribution up to equivalence . we denote the class of models equivalent to @xmath391 by @xmath393 . earlier we noted that models r and rm for sequences evolving on a pedigree @xmath394 define a hidden markov model with the spanning forests in @xmath58 as hidden states and characters from @xmath87 as observed states . we call it @xmath395 and denote its matrices by @xmath396 and @xmath397 . the initial distribution on hidden states is uniform : each spanning forest has the probability @xmath398 if the pedigree has @xmath399 arcs . we informally look at some of the issues about its identifiability . the transition matrix @xmath396 is defined by transition probabilities given in equation ( [ eq - gi - gj ] ) . therefore , @xmath396 will be identical ( up to a permutation of rows and columns ) for all pedigrees with the same number of arcs , for a fixed @xmath145 . but the set of spanning forests ( hidden states ) is unknown . we now describe at a high level how we compute the rows of @xmath397 . suppose the pedigree contains an undirected @xmath27-forest @xmath339 . there are @xmath400 spanning forests @xmath29 of @xmath58 that contain @xmath339 as the unique undirected @xmath27-forest , and corresponding to each of them we have a row of @xmath397 that is equal to @xmath401 . now consider a set @xmath402 of sufficiently long alignments as defined in equation [ eq - mcai ] . we compute the probability of @xmath403 ( i.e. , the probability that a random alignment is in @xmath403 ) . suppose that @xmath404 is the probability that there are no recombination events . thus @xmath404 approaches 1 as @xmath145 approaches 0 . then one of the terms in the expression for the probability of @xmath403 will be @xmath405 , where @xmath406 is the probability that the first site evolved on a spanning forest @xmath29 that contained @xmath339 as the undirected @xmath27-forest . there will be terms for contributions from other undirected @xmath27-forests @xmath407 , but they will be much smaller than the above term because they will contain factors @xmath408 ( as in equation [ eq - p - mcai ] ) . there will also be terms to account for recombinations among the first @xmath79 sites , but they will be small as well since they will contain @xmath145 as a factor ( in contrast to @xmath404 , which is a power of @xmath409 ) . so let us say @xmath410 is @xmath411 . therefore if @xmath145 is sufficiently small and @xmath79 is sufficiently large , then @xmath412 will be roughly equal to the dominating term @xmath413 , which will uniquely determine @xmath414 . in other words , if @xmath60 is another pedigree such that @xmath415 , then @xmath410 and @xmath416 will differ roughly by a multiple of @xmath417 . in the proof of proposition [ prop - n2 - 2 ] , we used a similar idea : the pedigree @xmath263 contains a certain subtree @xmath102 in which @xmath258 have a common ancestor , while the pedigree @xmath261 does not such a subtree . as a result , the alignments that are close to @xmath364 are more likely to have evolved on @xmath263 than on @xmath261 . suppose now that @xmath397 is identified and each of its rows is labelled by the corresponding unlabelled undirected @xmath27-forest . that is , the matrices @xmath397 that appear among the triples in the equivalence class @xmath393 of hmms are constructed . as pointed out above , the matrix @xmath396 and the initial distribution are also known up to relabelling of hidden states . but the equivalence class @xmath418 is not known unless we are able to label the rows and the columns of @xmath396 by unlabelled undirected @xmath27-forests in a manner consistent with the labelling of rows of @xmath397 . in other words , for full identifiability of @xmath395 , we would like to construct an automaton with transition probabilities given by @xmath396 and with its states labelled by unlabelled undirected @xmath27-forests . identifying the pedigree from the _ labelled automaton _ will then be a purely combinatorial problem . in this paper we do not succeed in constructing matrix @xmath396 with rows and columns labelled by undirected @xmath27-forests , but we are able to count certain types of _ walks _ ( to be described next ) on the automaton with vertices labelled by undirected @xmath27-forests . suppose that @xmath419 is a sequence of undirected @xmath27-forests such that no two consecutive ones are isomorphic . analogous to @xmath420 , we define @xmath421 as the number of sequences @xmath422 of spanning forests in @xmath58 such that @xmath423 , where consecutive @xmath133 are separated by just one recombination . ( a single recombination at a site is more likely than multiple recombinations . moreover , if there is a recombination at a site @xmath135 , but the two spanning forests @xmath133 and @xmath134 contain isomorphic undirected @xmath27-forests , then such a recombination has no effect on the emitted characters . these are the reasons why we consider the sequences @xmath339 and @xmath133 as above . ) we then consider a set @xmath424 of alignments of length @xmath425 ( for a suitably large @xmath79 ) obtained by concatenating alignments from @xmath403 for @xmath84 to @xmath269 . we compute the probability of @xmath424 ( as we described for @xmath426 above ) , and show that the dominating term is proportional to @xmath427 , and other terms are of smaller order of magnitude for small @xmath145 . this allows us to compute @xmath428 . a more visual description of the walks may be given as follows . suppose the pedigree has @xmath399 arcs . we define a graph on the vertex set consisting of the spanning forests of the pedigree , with two spanning forests @xmath133 and @xmath207 being adjacent if there is exactly one recombination separating them ( i.e. , @xmath429 ) . the graph is a hypercube . the hidden markov chain on the set of spanning forests jumps on the vertices of the cube . if there is at most one recombination at any site ( which is more likely than more than 1 recombinations at a site ) , then we have a walk on the edges of the cube . we label each vertex @xmath133 of the cube by the undirected @xmath27-forests @xmath430 . our interest is to construct this object for a more complete understanding of the hmm . but problem is made difficult by the fact that the emission probabilities associated with @xmath133 and @xmath207 are identical if @xmath431 . therefore , we construct a weaker object , namely the number of walks of each length on the cube such that consecutive vertices have distinct labels . let @xmath58 be a pedigree . for @xmath432 , we define @xmath433 & : = & n(g_1 > t_1 , g_2 > t_2 , \ldots , g_m > t_m : p ) \\[2 mm ] & : = & |\{\mathbf{g } \in { \mathcal{g}}_p^m : t_u(g_i ) \cong t_i \forall i \in [ m ] \wedge |e(g_{i+1})\bigtriangleup e(g_{i})| = 2 \ ; \forall\ ; i \in [ m-1]\}|,\end{aligned}\ ] ] where the second condition in the last line says that there is exactly one recombination event between consecutive @xmath133 . in the rest of this section , we show how invariants @xmath434 may be computed from the probability distribution on the space of alignments under model rm . in the end , we demonstrate an application to pedigrees @xmath245 and @xmath243 shown in figure [ fig - hap ] . lem - pg ] let @xmath58 be a pedigree with @xmath204 arcs . let @xmath435 be a sequence of spanning forests in @xmath58 . then under model @xmath179 , the probability that @xmath136 is a sequence of site - specific spanning forests is given by @xmath436 where @xmath437 and @xmath438 are as in definition [ def - rg - sg ] . we have a factor @xmath145 for each recombination event and @xmath409 whenever there is no recombination ( i.e. , an arc is contained in two consecutive spanning forests in the sequence ) . the probability that the first spanning forest is @xmath40 is @xmath398 . let @xmath318 be an alignment of length @xmath79 . for an interval @xmath439 \subseteq [ l]$ ] , we write @xmath440 $ ] for the part of the alignment between columns @xmath441 and @xmath442 ( inclusive of columns @xmath441 and @xmath442 ) . for a sequence of alignments @xmath443 $ ] , let @xmath444 denote the alignment obtained by concatenating alignments @xmath445 ( in that order ) . let @xmath446 $ ] be sets of alignments . we define @xmath447\}.\ ] ] [ lem - pa ] let @xmath58 be a pedigree with @xmath204 arcs . the probability of an alignment @xmath318 on @xmath58 is given by @xmath448 & = & \sum_{k=1}^{l}\ ; \sum_{\mathbf{g } \in { \mathcal{g}}_p^k } \frac{(1-p)^{e(l - k)+s(\mathbf{g})}p^{r(\mathbf{g})}}{2^{e } } \sum_{\substack{\mathbf{l } \in { \mathbb{z}}_+^k : \\ \sum\limits_{i=1}^kl_i = l}}\ ; \prod_{i=1}^k{\mathtt{pr}}\{a[l_{i-1}+1,l_i ] { \mid}t_u(g_i),m(\mu ) \ } , \nonumber \\ & & \end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath449 , @xmath450 and @xmath451 , and the second summation is over @xmath136 such that consecutive spanning forests @xmath452 and @xmath134 are unequal for @xmath453 $ ] . the probability of an alignment of length @xmath79 is obtained by summing its probability over all spanning subgraph sequences of length @xmath79 . suppose that the recombinations in a spanning subgraph sequence occur only at sites @xmath454 , for @xmath455 , where @xmath456 . we write the spanning forest sequence of length @xmath79 as @xmath457 . then the probability of the alignment is written as a product of probabilities of its segments that have evolved on spanning forests @xmath133 ( i.e. , effectively on @xmath430 ) . this probability is summed over @xmath458 ( with the constraint @xmath459 ) , @xmath460 $ ] and @xmath461 . for a fixed @xmath462 , the probability of @xmath457 is given by lemma [ lem - pg ] . for @xmath463 , we will compute @xmath464 by summing ( [ eq - pa ] ) over @xmath465 . in such a calculation , we will sometimes use the following upper bound in evaluating the last summation in ( [ eq - pa ] ) for fixed values of @xmath10 , and fixed @xmath466 and @xmath136 . [ lem - pa - ub2 ] let @xmath463 . let @xmath467 . let @xmath468 : a \in { \mathcal{a}}\ } , i \in [ k]$ ] . then for any fixed @xmath469 @xmath470 we have equality if @xmath471 . the claim follows from the observation that @xmath472 . the following lemma is used in the proof of equation ( [ eq-3b ] ) , and the reader may skip it until then . [ lem - seq ] let @xmath473 be a finite set . let @xmath474 and @xmath475 be two sequences in @xmath473 , each of length @xmath476 , defined by @xmath477 where @xmath478 and @xmath479 $ ] , and @xmath480 where @xmath481 and @xmath482 $ ] . suppose that @xmath474 and @xmath475 satisfy the constraints : @xmath483 $ ] ; @xmath484 $ ] ; @xmath485 ; if @xmath486 , then @xmath487 for some @xmath135 . then there is at least one block @xmath488 of @xmath474 over which @xmath474 and @xmath475 mismatch everywhere ; hence there are at least @xmath489\}$ ] mismatches between the two sequences . suppose that the claim is false ; so in each block @xmath488 of @xmath474 , there is a matching symbol in @xmath475 . therefore , @xmath419 is a subsequence of @xmath475 and @xmath490 . this , together with @xmath483 $ ] and @xmath491 , implies that @xmath486 and @xmath492 $ ] , which contradicts the assumption that when @xmath486 , there is some @xmath135 for which @xmath487 . [ thm - paths ] let @xmath58 and @xmath60 be any two pedigrees with @xmath493 arcs . let @xmath494 be any sequence of undirected @xmath27-forests in which consecutive @xmath27-forests are non - isomorphic . then for all @xmath281 , there exists @xmath495 such that for all @xmath496 , the following statement is true : if @xmath497 , then @xmath498 . let @xmath499 , where @xmath500 and @xmath336 are as defined in equations ( [ eq - eps0 ] ) and ( [ eq - mcai ] ) , respectively . we will choose @xmath501 ( defined at the end of section [ sec - consistency ] ) and @xmath79 ( that depends on @xmath501 ) suitably later . the probability of @xmath424 on @xmath58 and @xmath60 is written by summing ( [ eq - pa ] ) over all @xmath465 . but based on theorem [ thm - identifiability ] , corollary [ cor - consistency ] and lemma [ lem - eps - l2 ] , we can make the following qualitative and somewhat informal statement : if @xmath79 is large enough , then @xmath502 will get significantly higher contribution from spanning forest sequences @xmath503 of length @xmath504 such that @xmath505 for all @xmath506 $ ] and @xmath507 are all close to @xmath79 , than from spanning forest sequences @xmath508 for which there are many mismatches ( in terms of isomorphism ) between sequences @xmath509 and @xmath510 or if they require more than @xmath511 recombinations . let @xmath512 , where @xmath513 is the joint probability of @xmath424 and the event that there are exactly @xmath10 recombinations . furthermore , we write @xmath514 , where @xmath515 is the contribution from spanning forest sequences @xmath516 of length @xmath517 such that @xmath505 for all @xmath506 $ ] , and @xmath518 is the remaining contribution to @xmath519 , i.e. , from spanning forest sequences @xmath520 of length @xmath517 such that either @xmath521 ( i.e. , the @xmath511 recombinations occur at fewer than @xmath511 sites ) , or @xmath522 and @xmath523 for some @xmath506 $ ] . we will show that only @xmath515 makes a significant contribution to @xmath524 . in particular , we will show that the various contributions to @xmath525 take the following form : @xmath526 \sum_{k < m-1}p_k(p ) + p_{(m-1)b}(p ) & < & \delta_1 \\[1 mm ] \sum_{k \geq m } p_k(p ) & < & \delta_2 , \end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath527 does not depend on the pedigree ( but depends on the undirected @xmath27-forest sequence @xmath474 ) . moreover , @xmath527 , @xmath528 and @xmath529 depend on @xmath530 and @xmath501 . we will show that when @xmath145 and @xmath501 are sufficiently small and @xmath79 is sufficiently large , @xmath528 and @xmath529 are very small compared to @xmath527 . it will imply that for @xmath502 and @xmath531 to be equal , @xmath532 and @xmath533 must be equal . ( otherwise , there would be a difference between @xmath502 and @xmath531 that is of the order of a multiple of @xmath527 . ) _ a lower bound on @xmath515 . _ since the consecutive @xmath27-forests in @xmath474 are nonisomorphic and @xmath505 for all @xmath506 $ ] , there is at least one recombination between consecutive spanning forests @xmath133 . and since there are exactly @xmath511 recombinations , there must be exactly one recombination between consecutive spanning forests . therefore , @xmath534 & & \times \left ( \sum_{a \in { \mathcal{a } } } \sum_{\substack{\mathbf{l } \in { \mathbb{z}}_+^m : \\ \sum\limits_{i=1}^ml_i = m^2l}}\ ; \prod_{i=1}^m{\mathtt{pr}}\{a[l_{i-1}+1,l_i ] { \mid}t_u(g_i),m(\mu ) \}\right ) \nonumber \\ & : = & n(\mathbf{g } \geq \mathbf{t}:p ) \delta(\mathbf{t } ) , \end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath449 , @xmath450 . the inner summation is evaluated for any fixed choice of @xmath535 such that @xmath505 for all @xmath506 $ ] , because for any fixed @xmath536 $ ] , and spanning forest sequences @xmath537 and @xmath538 , if @xmath539 for all @xmath506 $ ] , then for each alignment @xmath91 , we have @xmath540 { \mid}g_i^{l_i},m(\mu ) \ } = { \mathtt{pr}}\{a[l_{i-1}+1,l_i ] { \mid}(g_i^{\prime})^{l_i},m(\mu ) \ } = { \mathtt{pr}}\{a[l_{i-1}+1,l_i ] { \mid}t_u(g_i),m(\mu ) \}$ ] . therefore , the rhs is a product of @xmath532 and a factor that does not explicitly depend on the pedigree , but only on @xmath474 . we have @xmath541 to prove the lower bound , we sum ( [ eq - pa ] ) over spanning forest sequences of the type @xmath503 where @xmath505 for all @xmath506 $ ] and @xmath507 are such that the @xmath511 recombinations occur at sites @xmath542 , for a small positive constant @xmath353 , ( i.e. , we ignore contributions from the spanning forest sequences in which some of the recombinations are not near the boundaries of the blocks @xmath543 of @xmath424 ) . we can choose the recombination sites in @xmath544 ways . since @xmath545 and @xmath546 , the probability of @xmath136 is @xmath547 . we write @xmath548 , where @xmath549 are blocks of @xmath136 of length @xmath425 each . then we have @xmath550 for each @xmath136 and for all @xmath135 , provided we choose @xmath551 and @xmath501 appropriately according to lemma [ lem - eps - l2 ] . _ an upper bound on @xmath552 . _ we have @xmath553 & \leq & \sum_{k=0}^{m-1 } \frac{1}{2^e } \left(\sum_{l=0}^{k}n_{kl}\binom{m^2 l -1}{l } ( \epsilon_{max})^{m - l}\right ) p^k(1-p)^{e(m^2l-1)-k } \nonumber \\[2 mm ] & \leq & c_2 l^{m-1 } \epsilon_{max } : = \delta_1 , \end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath554 is the number of spanning forest sequences @xmath555 in which @xmath10 recombinations occur at @xmath476 sites , and @xmath556 is a constant that depends on @xmath4 and @xmath269 . we explain below how the bound is obtained . we fix @xmath557 such that @xmath558 . for @xmath559 , since we are only interested in the contribution @xmath560 , we fix @xmath136 with the additional restrictions in the definition of @xmath560 . suppose that the @xmath10 recombinations occur at @xmath476 distinct sites @xmath561 , where @xmath562 . so we write @xmath563 . there are @xmath554 choices for @xmath564 . for each choice of @xmath565 , there are @xmath566 choices for the recombining sites @xmath567 . each @xmath136 has a probability @xmath568 , where @xmath569 and @xmath570 . we show that @xmath571 is bounded above by @xmath572 for each @xmath136 with @xmath476 recombining sites that satisfies the above constraints . let @xmath573 be a spanning forest sequence of length @xmath504 . for @xmath506 , j \in [ m]$ ] , we refer to the subsequences @xmath574)$ ] as _ blocks _ of @xmath136 , and subsequences @xmath575)$ ] as _ subblocks _ of @xmath136 . we say that subblock @xmath576 is _ recombination - free _ if there are no recombinations between any two sites of the subblock . ( the subblock may have recombinations at its boundaries . ) by lemma [ lem - seq ] , there is at least one block , say the @xmath135-th block , over which the sequences @xmath474 and @xmath577 mismatch everywhere . since there are @xmath269 subblocks in each block and @xmath578 , there are at least @xmath579 recombination - free subblocks in the @xmath135-th block of @xmath136 . let these subblocks be denoted by @xmath580 . we have @xmath581 for each of them . therefore , @xmath582 _ an upper bound on @xmath583 . _ we use the following fact about binomially distributed random variables : if @xmath584 , then @xmath585 . ( this result is a consequence of the union bound . ) since there are @xmath586 points at which a recombination can possibly occur , we have @xmath587 where @xmath588 is a constant that depends on @xmath4 and @xmath269 . we write similar bounds for @xmath60 . now suppose that @xmath589 but @xmath590 . therefore , equations [ eq - term1a ] and [ eq - term1b ] imply that @xmath591 & = & |n(\mathbf{g } \geq \mathbf{t}:p ) - n(\mathbf{g } \geq \mathbf{t}:q)|\delta(\mathbf{t } ) \nonumber \\[2 mm ] & \geq & \frac{(2cl)^{m-1}(1-p)^{(em^2 l - m - e+1)}p^{(m-1 ) } ( 1-\epsilon_{max})^{(m^2)}}{2^{e}}. \end{aligned}\ ] ] but that is impossible if we can choose @xmath501 , @xmath79 , and @xmath145 so that @xmath592 , or @xmath593 in other words , the discrepancy @xmath594 can not be compensated for by the remaining terms in @xmath595 and @xmath596 . such a choice is possible . for example , we first choose @xmath597 , let us say , @xmath598 , where @xmath599 . we then set @xmath600 and @xmath601 so that @xmath602 the choice of @xmath79 must guarantee phylogenetic consistency as in corollary [ cor - consistency ] . moreover , we must set @xmath79 as small as possible so as to get a better bound on @xmath145 . by lemma [ lem - eps - l2 ] , @xmath79 is required to grow only logarithmically in @xmath603 , so let @xmath604 for a suitable choice of @xmath605 . now conditions ( [ eq - cond ] ) are satisfied for @xmath606 for @xmath607 . then ( [ eq - final ] ) is satisfied for sufficiently large @xmath608 . in the following , we illustrate theorem [ thm - paths ] with a general result on counting @xmath27-forests and a couple of specific examples . if the conditions of theorem [ thm - paths ] are satisfied , then @xmath58 and @xmath60 have the same number of undirected @xmath27-forests of each type . we apply theorem [ thm - paths ] for @xmath609 . suppose that @xmath58 is a pedigree with @xmath204 arcs . let @xmath102 be an undirected @xmath27-forest . suppose that we want to count the number of copies @xmath610 of @xmath102 in p. let @xmath611 be the distinct copies of @xmath102 in @xmath58 . for each @xmath339 , let @xmath612 be the undirected @xmath27-forests in @xmath58 that contain @xmath339 . ( to be precise , we have subgraphs @xmath613 and @xmath614 in @xmath58 such that when the ( directed ) arcs of @xmath613 and @xmath614 are replaced by ( undirected ) edges , we get the undirected @xmath27-forests @xmath339 and @xmath615 . but we do not make this distinction in the following . ) note that @xmath615 are all distinct @xmath27-forests . there are @xmath616 non - founder vertices in @xmath58 at which we can choose one of the two incoming arcs to construct a spanning forest @xmath29 that contains @xmath339 . therefore , for each @xmath339 there are @xmath617 spanning forests that contain @xmath339 . therefore , @xmath618 now by grouping terms on the rhs by isomorphism classes of @xmath615 , we obtain @xmath619 since @xmath620 for all undirected @xmath27-forests @xmath621 , we also have @xmath622 for all undirected @xmath27-forests @xmath102 . the examples of non - reconstructible pedigrees given in @xcite can be distinguished from the probability distribution on the space of alignments under model rm . pedigrees in these examples do not have the same number of @xmath27-forests of each type . for example , one pedigree in each pair contains a common ancestor of all extant vertices while the other does not . this may also be observed in the examples in figure [ fig - k3 ] . but knowing the number of @xmath27-forests of each type is not always enough to distinguish pedigrees , as verified by pedigrees @xmath245 and @xmath243 shown in figure [ fig - hap ] . they both have the same number of directed ( therefore , also undirected ) @xmath27-forests of each type : they have 4 directed @xmath27-forests in which 1 and 2 have a common ancestor . we denote their undirected @xmath27-forest by @xmath282 , which is a path of length 4 with end vertices 1 and 2 . there are 12 directed @xmath27-forests in which 1 and 2 do not have a common ancestor . we denote their undirected @xmath27-forest by @xmath283 , which consists of two isolated vertices 1 and 2 . moreover , @xmath623 and @xmath624 . also , for @xmath625 ( and for @xmath626 ) , we check by direct counting that @xmath627 . but @xmath245 and @xmath243 can nevertheless be distinguished as shown below . [ cor - pq ] pedigrees @xmath245 and @xmath243 in figure [ fig - hap ] are distinguished from the probability distribution on the space of alignments under model rm provided the crossover probability is sufficiently small . let @xmath282 and @xmath283 be the @xmath27-forests as described above . we apply theorem [ thm - paths ] for @xmath628 with @xmath629 . we can verify that @xmath630 and @xmath631 . therefore , @xmath245 and @xmath243 give different distributions on the space of alignments . in the following , we describe how @xmath632 and @xmath633 are counted . let @xmath634 denote the directed @xmath27-forests in @xmath245 and @xmath243 consisting of paths @xmath635 and @xmath636 . similarly , we write @xmath637 for other directed @xmath27-forests in @xmath245 and @xmath243 , rooted at @xmath8 , @xmath353 and @xmath114 , respectively . these are the 4 directed @xmath27-forests that have @xmath282 as their undirected @xmath27-forest . all other directed @xmath27-forests have @xmath283 as their undirected @xmath27-forest . _ counting _ @xmath638 : since @xmath639 , we count 16 different contributions to @xmath638 depending on the choices for @xmath640 and @xmath641 in @xmath642 . please refer to figure [ fig - p ] . when @xmath643 and @xmath644 ( left ) , and when @xmath643 and @xmath645 ( right),width=445 ] when @xmath643 and @xmath646 : this is possible only if @xmath647 . there are 4 choices of @xmath40 , and for each of them there are 4 choices for @xmath41 depending on which arc of @xmath634 is replaced to obtain @xmath41 . thus we have 16 sequences @xmath136 for which @xmath648 and @xmath646 . when @xmath643 and @xmath644 : the dashed arcs @xmath649 and @xmath650 in figure [ fig - p ] on the left must be obtained by replacing @xmath651 and @xmath652 , and there are two sequences @xmath136 that achieve this : either @xmath653 or @xmath654 . also , there are 4 possible ways to include arcs pointing to @xmath0 and @xmath655 in @xmath40 . therefore , there are 8 sequences @xmath136 such that @xmath643 and @xmath644 . when @xmath643 and @xmath645 : there are only 2 sequences @xmath136 for which this is possible , since the arcs @xmath656 and @xmath657 ( shown in bold in figure [ fig - p ] on the right ) must already be in @xmath40 . when @xmath643 and @xmath658 : this case is similar to the case @xmath645 . thus there are 28 choices of @xmath136 such that @xmath643 , and similarly 28 choices each for @xmath659 , @xmath660 , and @xmath661 . therefore , there are 112 sequences @xmath136 such that @xmath662 . _ counting _ @xmath633 : again we count 16 different contributions to @xmath633 depending on the choices for @xmath640 and @xmath641 in @xmath663 . please refer to figure [ fig - q ] . when @xmath664 and @xmath644 ( left ) , and when @xmath643 and @xmath658 ( right),width=445 ] when @xmath643 and @xmath646 : as in case of @xmath245 , we have 16 sequences @xmath136 for which @xmath643 and @xmath646 . when @xmath643 and @xmath644 : the dashed arcs @xmath650 and @xmath665 in figure [ fig - q ] on the left must be obtained by replacing @xmath652 and @xmath666 , and arc @xmath667 must already be in @xmath40 . there are two sequences @xmath136 that achieve this : either @xmath653 or @xmath668 . also , there are 2 choices for arcs pointing to @xmath0 , therefore , there are 2 choices for @xmath40 . therefore , there are 4 sequences @xmath136 such that @xmath643 and @xmath669 . when @xmath643 and @xmath645 : this case is similar to the case in which @xmath644 , therefore , there are 4 sequences such that @xmath643 and @xmath645 . when @xmath643 and @xmath658 : in this case , the arcs @xmath670 and @xmath671 must already be in @xmath40 . thus there are only two sequences @xmath136 that are counted depending on whether @xmath672 or @xmath668 . thus there are 26 choices of @xmath136 such that @xmath643 , and similarly 26 choices each for @xmath659 , @xmath660 , and @xmath661 . therefore , there are 104 sequences @xmath136 such that @xmath662 . thus we have verified that @xmath638 and @xmath633 are unequal for @xmath673 , implying that @xmath245 and @xmath243 are distinguished by the probability distribution they induce on the extant sequences under model rm . in this paper we have presented a rigorous mathematical framework for studying pedigree reconstruction problems under probabilistic models . we extended phylogenetic identifiability results to reconstruct pedigrees under an idealised model of recombination and mutation . the main result of this paper is the computation of a class of combinatorial invariants from the joint distribution of extant sequences . as a corollary , we were able to show that certain known examples of pedigrees that could not be distinguished from path lengths alone , could be distinguished by a more detailed analysis of subgraph sequences . here we identify a few open problems and directions for future investigation . _ identifiability of computationally tractable invariants : _ the invariants of a pedigree @xmath58 defined by @xmath434 may be quite difficult to apply in general . theorem [ thm - paths ] may be difficult to use computationally for bigger pedigrees . even for other reconstruction problems in graph theory , computational verifications are difficult . for example , ulam s reconstruction conjecture has been computationally verified to be true only for graphs on at most 11 vertices @xcite . even on restricted classes of graphs , computational reconstruction experiments are difficult to perform . it will be useful to derive from @xmath674 ( or independently ) other identifiable invariants that may be easier to use in computational experiments . theorem [ thm - paths ] only states that if two pedigrees induce the same joint distribution on extant sequences under model rm , then they agree on the invariants @xmath675 . but it will be important to prove a converse or a result of the type : two pedigrees induce the same distribution on extant sequences under model rm if and only if they take the same value for a class of combinatorial invariants . such a result would reduce the identifiability problem to a purely combinatorial problem of proving or disproving that the class of invariants is complete . such a class of invariants may be @xmath676 or it may be somewhat stronger than @xmath677 . it may be possible to compute , by the methods of theorem [ thm - paths ] , other invariants , for example , spanning forest sequences in which consecutive spanning forests are not necessarily separated by just one recombination . _ improving the bound on @xmath145 : _ in the lower bound on @xmath527 in equation ( [ eq - term1b ] ) , we have @xmath398 in the denominator , while @xmath678 is roughly @xmath679 , where @xmath4 is the number of arcs in a pedigree . therefore , it is possible to obtain better bounds on @xmath145 for the applicability of the main theorem for pedigrees with fewer arcs . therefore , we would significantly improve the upper bound on @xmath145 if we showed that a pedigree can be reconstructed from the collection of its subpedigrees ( pedigrees of subsets of the extant population ) of order @xmath10 for some small @xmath10 . in @xcite we made a conjecture about how small @xmath10 may be for pedigrees of order @xmath680 in which the population remains constant over generations . thus solving the purely combinatorial problem of reconstructing pedigrees from their subpedigrees , while important in its own right , will be useful for improving bounds on @xmath145 in theorem [ thm - paths ] . on the other hand it is also likely ( although we do not conjecture ) that theorem [ thm - paths ] is valid without restrictions on @xmath145 , or for all but finitely many values of @xmath145 , or for all @xmath145 except when @xmath223 takes small values . but we do not have good intuition as to why proposition [ prop - n2 - 2 ] ( with @xmath266 ) requires a more complicated argument and an upper bound on @xmath145 . _ maximum likelihood computation of the invariants @xmath681 _ : it will be of interest to derive statistical consistency results and bounds on sequence lengths , analogous to corollary [ cor - consistency ] and lemma [ lem - eps - l1 ] , for computing the invariants @xmath675 . for example , we would like to make the following qualitative statement precise . suppose @xmath58 is a pedigree with @xmath4 arcs . let @xmath607 be given . suppose @xmath474 is an undirected @xmath27-forest sequence of length @xmath269 with no two consecutive @xmath27-forests isomorphic . then there is a sufficiently large @xmath682 such that if a collection of sequences of length @xmath683 evolved on @xmath58 giving an alignment @xmath91 , then the likelihood ratio @xmath684 is large for all pedigrees @xmath60 such that @xmath685 . we expect that @xmath682 would be of the order of @xmath686 . i would like to thank jotun hein and mike steel for many valuable comments and for pointing me to many useful references relevant to this work . in particular , mike s comments on and references to the literature on phylogenetic identifiability results and results on the consistency of ml were very useful . this project was funded by the grant `` from complete genomes to global pedigrees '' from epsrc ( engineering and physical sciences research council ) , u.k . i would like to thank jotun hein and epsrc for supporting my postdoctoral stay at the university of oxford under this grant . i am currently working on the project `` tree - graphs and incidence matrices : theory and applications '' funded by cnpq , brasil ( processo : 151782/2010 - 5 ) at the instituto de matemtica e estatstica , universidade de so paulo , where i completed a significant revision of this paper and improvements on the bounds in the main theorem . i would also like to thank yoshiharu kohayakawa with whom i had very useful conversations during the revision of this paper . guy bresler , elchanan mossel , and allan sly . reconstruction of markov random fields from samples : some observations and algorithms . in a. goel _ et al . _ , editor , _ 11th international workshop , approx 2008 , and 12th international workshop , random 2008 , lncs 5171 _ , pages 343356 , berlin heidelberg , 2008 . springer - verlag . Abstract:

Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.

Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered . Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video . Paper: the problem of time synchronization in large distributed systems consists of giving all the physically disjoint elements of the system a common time scale on which to operate . this common time scale is usually achieved by periodically synchronizing the clock at each element to a reference time source , so that the local time seen by each element of the system is approximately the same . time synchronization plays an important role in many systems in that it allows the entire system to cooperate and function as a cohesive group . time synchronization is an old problem @xcite , but the question of scalability is not . recent advances in sensor networks show a clear trend towards the development of large scale networks with high node density . for example , a hardware simulation - and - deployment platform for wireless sensor networks capable of simulating networks with on the order of 100,000 nodes was recently developed @xcite . as well , for many years the smart dust project sought to build cubic - millimeter motes for a wide range of applications @xcite . also , there is work in progress on the drastic miniaturization of power sources @xcite . these developments ( and many others ) indicate that large scale , high density networks are on the horizon . large scale , high density networks have applications in a variety of situations . consider , for example , the military application of sniper localization . large numbers of wireless nodes can be deployed to find the shooter location as well as the trajectory of the projectile @xcite . since the effective range of a long - range sniper rifle can be nearly @xmath0 km , in order to fully track the trajectory of the projectile it may be essential that our deployed network be tightly synchronized over distances of a few kilometers . another example might be the implementation of a distributed radio for communication . in extracting information from a deployed sensor network , it may be beneficial for the nodes to cooperatively transmit information to a far away receiver @xcite . such an application would require that nodes across the network be well synchronized . as a result , a need for the synchronization of large distributed systems is very real and one that requires careful study to understand the fundamental performance limits on synchronization . the synchronization of large networks has been studied in fields ranging from biology to electrical engineering . the study of synchronous behavior has generally taken one of two approaches . the first approach is to consider synchronization as an emergent behavior in complex networks of oscillators . in that work , models are developed to describe natural phenomena and synchronization emerges from these models . the second approach is to develop and analyze algorithms that synchronize engineering networks . nodes are programmed with algorithms that estimate clock skew and clock offset to achieve network synchronization . however , both of these approaches have significant limitations . emergent synchronization properties in large populations has been the object of intense study in the applied mathematics ( @xcite ) , physics ( @xcite ) , and neural networks ( @xcite ) literature . these studies were motivated by a number of examples observed in nature : * in certain parts of south - east asia , thousands of male fireflies congregate in trees and flash in synchrony at night @xcite . * pacemaker cells of the heart , which on average cause 80 contractions a minute during a person s lifetime @xcite . * the insulin - secreting cells of the pancreas @xcite . for further information and examples , see @xcite , and the references therein . a number of models have been proposed to explain the emergence of synchrony , but perhaps one of the most successful and well known is the model of _ pulse - coupled oscillators _ by mirollo and strogatz @xcite , based on dynamical systems theory . consider a function @xmath1\to[0,1]$ ] that is smooth , monotone increasing , concave down ( i.e. , @xmath2 and @xmath3 ) , and is such that @xmath4 and @xmath5 . consider also a phase variable @xmath6 such that @xmath7 , where @xmath8 is the period of a cycle . then , each element in a group of @xmath9 oscillators is described by a state variable @xmath10 $ ] and a phase variable @xmath11 $ ] as follows : * in isolation , @xmath12 . * if @xmath13 then @xmath14 , and if @xmath15 then @xmath16 . * when @xmath17 for any of the @xmath18 s and some time @xmath19 , then for all other @xmath20 , @xmath21 @xmath22 where @xmath23 denotes an infinitesimal amount of time after @xmath19 . that is , oscillator @xmath18 reaching the end of a cycle causes the state of all other oscillators to increase by the amount @xmath24 , and the phase variable to change accordingly . the state variable @xmath25 can be thought of as a voltage . charge is accumulated over time according to the nonlinearity @xmath26 and it discharges once it reaches full charge , resetting the charging process . upon discharging , it causes all other charges to increase by a fixed amount of @xmath24 , up to the discharge point . for this model , it is proved in @xcite that for all @xmath9 and for almost all initial conditions , the system eventually becomes synchronized . for the network to converge into a synchronous state , one key assumption is that the behavior of every single oscillator is governed by the same function @xmath27 . this means that all oscillators must have the same frequency . from the literature , it appears that this requirement is nearly always needed . as far as we are aware , for a fully synchronous behavior to emerge , the oscillators need to have the same , or nearly the same , oscillation frequencies . the need for nearly identical oscillators presents a significant limitation for emergent synchronization . this emergence of synchrony is clearly desirable and it has been considered for communication and sensor networks in @xcite . however , whether or not these techniques can be adapted to synchronize networks with nodes that have arbitrary oscillator frequencies ( clock skew ) is still unclear . thus , in order to overcome this limitation and find techniques capable of synchronizing a more general class of networks , we turn to algorithms designed to estimate certain unknown parameters such as clock skew . there have been many synchronization techniques proposed for use in sensor networks . these algorithms generally allow each node to estimate its clock skew and clock offset relative to the reference clock . reference broadcast synchronization ( rbs ) @xcite eliminates transmitter side uncertainties by having a transmitter broadcast reference packets to the surrounding nodes . the receiving nodes then synchronize to each other using the arrival of the reference packets as synchronization events . tiny - sync / mini - sync @xcite and the timing - sync protocol for sensor networks ( tpsn ) @xcite organize the network into a hierarchial structure and the nodes are synchronized using pair - wise synchronization . in lightweight tree - based synchronization ( lts ) @xcite , pair - wise synchronization is also employed but the goal of lts is to reduce communication and computation requirements by taking advantage of relaxed accuracy constraints . the flooding time synchronization protocol ( ftsp ) @xcite achieves one - hop synchronization by having a root node broadcast timing information to surrounding nodes . these surrounding nodes then proceed to broadcast their synchronized timing information to nodes beyond the broadcast domain of the root node . this process can continue for multi - hop networks . the problem with each of these traditional synchronization techniques is that synchronization error will increase with each hop . since each node is estimating certain synchronization parameters , i.e. clock skew , there will be inherent errors in the estimate . as a result , a node multiple hops away from the node with the reference clock will be estimating its parameters from intermediate nodes that already have estimation errors . therefore , this introduces a fundamental _ scalability problem _ : as the number of hops across the network grows , the synchronization error across the network will also grow . current trends in network technology are clearly moving us in the direction of large , multi - hop networks . first , sensors are decreasing in size and this size decrease will most likely be accompanied by a decrease in communication range . thus , more hops will be required to traverse a network deployed over a given area . second , as we deploy networks over larger and larger areas , then for a given communication range , the number hops across the network will also increase . in either case , the increased number of hops required to communicate across the network will increase synchronization error . therefore , it is essential that we develop techniques than can mitigate the accumulation of synchronization error over multiple hops . to decrease the error increase in each hop , we need to decrease the estimation error . there are two primary ways of achieving this . first , each node can increase the amount of timing information it obtains from neighboring nodes . for example , from a received timing packet , the node may be able to construct a data point telling it the approximate time at the reference clock and the corresponding time at its local clock . using a collection of these data points , the node can estimate clock skew and clock offset . so instead of using , say , five packets with timing information , a node can wait for ten packets . more data points will generally give better estimates . the drawback to such an approach is the increase in the number of packet exchanges . the second way in which to reduce estimation error is to increase the quality of each data point obtained by the nodes . this can be achieved through improving packet exchange algorithms and time stamping techniques . however , we believe that there is one fundamentally new approach to improving data point quality that has not be carefully studied . this is to use spatial averaging to improve the quality of each data point . the motivation for this approach is very simple . assume that each node has many neighbors . if all nodes in the network are to be synchronized , then the neighbors of any given node will also have synchronization information . is it possible to simultaneously use information from all the neighbors to improve the quality of a timing observation made by a node ? furthermore , it would seem to make sense that with more neighbors , hence more available timing information , the quality of the constructed data point should improve . if this is indeed the case , then achieving synchronization through the use of spatial averaging will provide a fundamentally new trade - off in improving synchronization performance . network designers would simply be able to increase the number and density of nodes to obtain better network synchronization . the study of cooperative time synchronization using spatial averaging is the focus of this work . to obtain a model for developing cooperative synchronization in large wireless networks , we begin by looking at the signals observed by a node in a network with @xmath9 nodes uniformly deployed over a fixed finite area . to start , we assume propagation delay to negligible ( the general case is considered in section [ sec : timedelay ] ) . all nodes transmit a pulse @xmath28 and a node @xmath29 will see a signal @xmath30 which is the superposition of all these pulses , @xmath31 in this expression , @xmath28 is the basic pulse transmitted by each node ( assumed to be the same for all nodes ) . @xmath32 is the ideal pulse transmit time , but since we assume imperfect time synchronization among the nodes we have @xmath33 modelling random errors in the pulse transmission time . @xmath34 models the amplitude loss in the signal transmitted by the @xmath18th node . @xmath35 is the maximum magnitude transmitted by a node . we scale each node s transmission by @xmath9 so that as the network density grows , the total power radiated does not grow unbounded . this model thus describes the received signal seen at a node @xmath29 for a network with @xmath9 nodes and this holds for any @xmath9 . increasing @xmath9 will have two effects : ( a ) node density will increase since the network area is fixed and ( b ) node signal transmission magnitude will decrease due to the @xmath36 scaling . therefore , by increasing @xmath9 this model allows us to study the scalability of networks as node density grows and node size decreases . given that these are the signals observed at each node , we ask : is it possible for @xmath30 to encode a time synchronization signal that will enable all nodes in the network to synchronize their clocks with bounded error , as @xmath37 ? the answer is yes , and the key to proving all our results is the law of large numbers . our key idea is the following . if all nodes were able to determine when time @xmath32 ( in the reference time ) arrives , then by transmitting @xmath28 at time @xmath32 , the signal observed at any node @xmath29 would be @xmath38 , which is a suitably scaled version of @xmath28 centered at @xmath32 . in reality however , there will be some error in the determination of @xmath32 , which we account for by allowing for a node - dependent random error @xmath39 . but , if the distribution of @xmath39 satisfies certain conditions , then the effects of that timing error can be averaged out . a pictorial representation of why this should be the case is shown in fig . [ fig : why - sync - holds ] . therefore , intuitively we can see how the technique of _ cooperative time synchronization _ using spatial averaging can average out the inherent timing errors in each node . even though there is randomness and uncertainty in each node s estimates , by using cooperation among a large number of nodes it is possible to recover _ deterministic _ parameters from the resulting aggregate waveform ( such as the location of certain zero - crossings ) in the limit as node density grows unbounded . thus more nodes will give us better estimates . this is because the random waveform converges to a deterministic one as more and more nodes cooperatively generate an aggregate waveform . at the same time , the average power required by each node will decrease since smaller nodes send smaller signals . therefore , by programming suitable dynamics into the nodes , in this paper we show how it is possible to generate an aggregate output signal with _ zero - crossings in the limit of asymptotically dense networks . thus , the detection of these zero - crossings plays the same role as that of an externally generated time reference signal based on which all nodes can synchronize . we develop this synchronization technique in three main steps . one , we set up the model for @xmath30 . two , we specify characteristics of the model ( i.e. the distribution of @xmath33 ) that allow us to prove desirable properties of the aggregate waveform ( such as a center zero - crossing at @xmath32 ) . three , we develop the estimators needed for our synchronization technique and show that the estimators give us the desired characteristics . the main contributions presented in this paper are the following ; * the definition of a probabilistic model for the study of the time synchronization problem in wireless networks . this model does contain the classical mirollo - strogatz model as a special case , but its formulation and the tools used to prove convergence results are of a completely different nature ( purely probabilistic , instead of based on the theory of dynamical systems ) . * using this model , we provide a rigorous analysis of a new cooperative time synchronization technique that employs spatial averaging and has favorable scaling properties . as the density of nodes increases , synchronization performance improves . in particular , in the limit of infinite density , deterministic parameters for synchronization can be recovered . * we show that cooperative time synchronization works perfectly for negligible propagation delay . when propagation delay is considered , we find that asymmetries at the boundaries reveal some limitations that need to be carefully considered in designing algorithms that take advantage of spatial averaging . in analyzing the proposed cooperative time synchronization technique , our goal is to show that the proposed technique can average out all random error and provide deterministic parameters for synchronization as node density grows unbounded . this asymptotic result can be viewed as a _ convergence in scale _ to synchrony . the result serves as a theoretical foundation for allowing a new trade - off between node density and synchronization performance . in particular , higher node density can yield better synchronization . the rest of this paper is organized as follows . the general model is presented in section [ sec : systemmodel ] . of particular interest here is section [ sec : specialcase ] , where we show how our model contains the model of mirollo and strogatz for pulse - coupled oscillators as a special case @xcite . in section [ sec : timesync - setup ] we specialize the general model for our synchronization setup and develop waveform properties that will be used in time synchronization . in section [ sec : timesynchronization ] we develop the cooperative time synchronization technique for no propagation delay . we extend the cooperative synchronization ideas to the case of propagation delay in section [ sec : timedelay ] . the paper concludes in section [ sec : conclusion ] with a detailed discussion on the scalability issue and how the technique proposed in this work lays the theoretical foundation for a general class of cooperative time synchronization techniques that use spatial averaging . we consider a network with @xmath9 nodes uniformly distributed over a fixed finite area . the behavior of each node @xmath18 is governed by a clock @xmath40 that counts up from @xmath41 . the introduction of @xmath40 is important since it provides a consistent timescale for node @xmath18 . by maintaining a table of pulse - arrival times , node @xmath18 can utilize the arrival times of many pulses over an extended period of time . the clock of one particular node in the network will serve as the reference time and to this clock we wish to synchronize all other nodes . we will call the node with the reference clock node @xmath42 and the clocks of other nodes are defined relative to the clock of node @xmath42 . we never adjust the frequency or offset of the local clock @xmath40 because we wish to maintain a consistent time scale for node @xmath18 . the clock of node @xmath42 , @xmath43 , will be defined as @xmath44 where @xmath45 . taking @xmath43 to be the reference clock , we now define the clock of any other arbitrary node @xmath18 , @xmath40 . we define @xmath40 as @xmath46 where * @xmath47 is an unknown offset between the start times of @xmath40 and @xmath43 . * @xmath48 is a constant and for each @xmath18 , @xmath49 $ ] where @xmath50 are finite . this bound on @xmath51 means that the frequency offsets between any two nodes can not be arbitrarily large . * @xmath52 is a stochastic process modeling random timing jitter . thus , this model assumes that there is a bounded constant frequency offset between the oscillators of any two nodes as well as some random clock jitter . it is important to note that node @xmath42 does not have to be special in any way ; its clock is simply a reference time on which to define the clocks of the other nodes . this means that our clock model actually describes the relative relationship of all the clocks in the network by using an arbitrary node s clock as a reference . from section [ sec : intromodel ] , we see that we are interested in studying the aggregate waveform observed at a node @xmath29 . as a result , we are only concerned with the aggregate signal magnitude and do not care about the particular signal contribution from each surrounding node . with this in mind , we can develop a random model for pathloss that , for dense networks , gives the appropriate aggregate signal magnitude at node @xmath29 . such a model is ideal for our situation since we are studying asymptotically dense networks . we start with a general pathloss model @xmath53 , where @xmath54 for all distances @xmath55 , is non - increasing and continuous . @xmath53 is a fraction of the transmitted magnitude seen at distance @xmath56 from the transmitter . for example , if the receiver node @xmath29 is at distance @xmath56 from node @xmath18 , and node @xmath18 transmits a signal of magnitude @xmath57 , then node @xmath29 will hear a signal of magnitude @xmath58 . we derive @xmath53 from a power pathloss model since any pathloss model captures the _ average _ received power at a given distance from the transmitter . this average received power is perfect for modelling received signal magnitudes in our problem setup since we are considering asymptotically dense networks . due to the large number of nodes at any given distance @xmath56 from the receiver , using the average received magnitude at distance @xmath56 as the contribution from each node at that distance will give a good modelling of the amplitude of the aggregate waveform . the random pathloss variable @xmath59 will be derived from @xmath53 . to understand how @xmath59 and @xmath53 are related , we give an intuitive explanation of the meaning of @xmath59 as follows : the @xmath60 $ ] is the fraction of nodes at distances @xmath56 from node @xmath29 such that @xmath61 , where @xmath62 is a small constant . this means that , roughly speaking , for any given scaling factor @xmath63 , @xmath64 is the fraction of received signals with magnitude scaled by approximately @xmath65 , where @xmath66 is the probability density function of @xmath59 . thus , if we scale the transmit magnitude @xmath57 from every node @xmath18 by an independent @xmath59 , then as the number of nodes , @xmath9 , gets large , node @xmath29 will see @xmath67 signals of approximate magnitude @xmath68 , and this holds for all @xmath65 in the range of @xmath59 . this is because taking a large number of independent samples from a distribution results in a good approximation of the distribution . thus , this intuition tells us that scaling the magnitude of the signal transmitted from every node @xmath18 by an independent sample of the random variable @xmath59 gives an aggregate signal at node @xmath29 that is the same magnitude as if we generated the signal using @xmath53 directly . even though the signals from two nodes at the same distance from a receiver have correlated magnitudes , we do not care about the signal magnitude from any particular node but only that an appropriate number of all possible received signal magnitudes contribute to the aggregate waveform . for a receiving node @xmath29 , we choose therefore to work with the random variable @xmath59 instead of directly with @xmath53 because , for the goals of this paper , doing so has two major advantages : ( a ) we can obtain desirable limit results by placing very minimal restrictions on the distribution of the @xmath59 s ( and hence on @xmath53 ) and ( b ) we can apply tools from probability theory ( basically , the strong law of large numbers ) to carry out our analysis . from the above intuition we can define the cumulative distribution function of @xmath59 as @xmath69 \\ 1 & k\in(1,\infty ) \end{array } \right.\ ] ] where * @xmath70 is the total area of the network , * @xmath71 is the area of the network contained in a circle of radius @xmath72 centered at node @xmath29 , * @xmath73 . from the above discussion we see that the distribution of @xmath59 is only a function of node @xmath29 , the receiving node . we illustrate the relationship among node @xmath29 , @xmath53 , @xmath74 , and @xmath75 in fig [ fig : propmodel - illus ] . we sometimes write @xmath34 with @xmath18 used to index each node surrounding node @xmath29 . @xmath18 is thus indexing a sequence of independent random variables @xmath34 for fixed @xmath29 . therefore , for a given @xmath29 , @xmath34 s are independent and identically distributed ( i.i.d . ) with a cumulative distribution function given by ( [ eq : prop_cdf ] ) for all @xmath18 . we assume that @xmath59 has the following properties : * @xmath59 is independent from @xmath76 for all @xmath29 , @xmath77 , and @xmath78 . * @xmath79 , @xmath80 , and @xmath81 . the requirements on the random variable @xmath59 places restrictions on the model @xmath53 . any function @xmath53 that yields a @xmath59 with the above requirements can be used to model pathloss . in this section we develop a more complex model to simultaneously model propagation delay and pathloss . this leads to the joint development of the delay random variable @xmath82 and a corresponding pathloss random variable @xmath59 . since we want to develop a model for both pathloss and time delay , we start by keeping the pathloss function @xmath53 defined in section [ sec : prop - model ] . the general delay model assumes a function @xmath83 that models the time delay as a function of distance . @xmath83 describes the time in terms of @xmath43 that it takes for a signal to propagate a distance @xmath56 . for example , if node @xmath18 and node @xmath29 are distance @xmath84 apart , then a pulse sent by node @xmath18 at time @xmath85 will be seen at node @xmath29 at time @xmath86 . we make the reasonable assumption that @xmath83 is continuous and strictly monotonically increasing for @xmath55 . as with the pathloss only model , we want to define a delay random variable @xmath82 for each receiving node @xmath29 . recall that this means that for every node @xmath29 there is a random variable @xmath82 associated with it since , in general , each node @xmath29 will see different delays . there is a correlation between the delay random variable @xmath82 and the pathloss random variable @xmath59 . this correlation arises for two main reasons . first , since in section [ sec : prop - model ] we define @xmath53 to be monotonically decreasing and continuous , it is possible for @xmath87 for @xmath88 , @xmath89 . this might be the case for a multi - hop network . in this situation , there will be a set of nodes whose transmissions will never reach node @xmath29 ( i.e. infinite delay ) even though according to @xmath83 these nodes should contribute a signal with finite delay . second , a small @xmath59 value would represent a signal from a far away node . as a result , the corresponding @xmath82 value should be large to reflect large delay . therefore , keeping these two points in mind , we proceed to develop a model for both pathloss and propagation delay . we define the cumulative distribution function of @xmath82 as @xmath90 \\ a(x-\delta(r))+\frac{a(j , r)}{a_{t } } & x\in(\delta(r),\delta(r+\delta r ) ] \\ 1 & x\in(\delta(r+\delta r),\infty ) \end{array } \right.\ ] ] where @xmath91 , @xmath92 is a constant , @xmath93 , and @xmath94 recall that @xmath71 , defined in section [ sec : prop - model ] , is the area of the network contained in a circle of radius @xmath72 centered at node @xmath29 and @xmath70 is the total area of the network . note that @xmath95 can be infinite . using the delay random variable @xmath82 with the cumulative distribution function in ( [ eq : delay_cdf ] ) , we define @xmath59 as @xmath96 where @xmath97 is the deterministic pathloss function from section [ sec : prop - model ] and @xmath98 is the inverse function of the deterministic delay function @xmath99 . note that @xmath100 exists since @xmath99 is continuous and strictly monotonically increasing on @xmath101 . to understand the distribution of @xmath82 , we need to consider the definition of @xmath59 as well . recall that a signal arriving with delay @xmath82 is scaled by the pathloss random variable @xmath59 . let us consider the cumulative distribution in two pieces , @xmath102 $ ] and @xmath103 . the case for @xmath104 is trivial . first , for @xmath102 $ ] , the probability that @xmath82 takes a value less than or equal to @xmath105 is simply the fraction of the network area around node @xmath29 such that the nodes are at distances @xmath56 with @xmath106 . the intuition is the same as that for the development of @xmath59 in section [ sec : prop - model ] . second , for @xmath103 , the situation is more complex . note that a transmitted signal from a node at distance @xmath107 from @xmath29 will arrive at node @xmath29 with infinite delay since @xmath87 for @xmath107 . since any delay values in @xmath103 correspond to distances @xmath108 , the corresponding scaling value will be zero because @xmath59 and @xmath82 are related by ( [ eq : djkjconnection ] ) . as a result , it does not matter what delay values we assign to the fraction of the network area outside a circle of radius @xmath95 centered at node @xmath29 as long as their delay value @xmath105 is such that @xmath109 . thus , we can arbitrarily choose a constant @xmath110 value and construct a piecewise linear portion of the cumulative distribution function of @xmath82 on @xmath103 . the probability that @xmath111 will be the fraction of the network area outside a circle of radius @xmath95 around node @xmath29 . and since @xmath111 will have a corresponding @xmath59 value that is zero , this fraction of nodes will not contribute to the aggregate waveform at node @xmath29 . it is clear that the correlated @xmath82 and @xmath59 random variables work together to accurately model a signal arriving with both pathloss and propagation delay . an illustration of how @xmath53 , @xmath83 , node @xmath29 , and @xmath112 are related can be found in fig . [ fig : delaymodel - illus ] . we require that @xmath82 is bounded , has finite expectation , and has finite variance for all @xmath29 . note that @xmath113 by the requirement that @xmath114 . as well , since the cumulative distribution in ( [ eq : delay_cdf ] ) is continuous , and often absolutely continuous , we assume that @xmath82 has a probability density function @xmath115 . when we write @xmath116 , the @xmath18 indexes each node surrounding node @xmath29 . thus , the @xmath116 s are independent and identically distributed in @xmath18 for a given @xmath29 and have a cumulative distribution given by ( [ eq : delay_cdf ] ) . using the @xmath59 and @xmath82 developed in this section to simultaneously model pathloss and propagation delay , respectively , we will be able to closely approximate the received aggregate waveform at any node @xmath29 as @xmath37 . to summarize , we see that our choice of the pathloss and delay random variables will depend on what we want to model . if we only consider pathloss and not propagation delay , then we will use the random variable @xmath59 defined in section [ sec : prop - model ] . if we account for both pathloss and delay , then we will use the delay random variable @xmath82 in this section ( section [ sec : delay - model ] ) and the pathloss random variable @xmath59 defined by ( [ eq : djkjconnection ] ) . the exchange of pulses is the method through which the network will maintain time synchronization . each node @xmath18 will periodically transmit a scaled pulse @xmath117 , where @xmath118 is a constant and @xmath28 , in general , can be any pulse . we call the interval of time during which a synchronization pulse is transmitted a _ synchronization phase_. what each node does with a set of pulse arrival observations is determined by the pulse - connection function @xmath119 for node @xmath18 . the pulse - connection function is a function that determines the time , in the time scale of @xmath40 , when node @xmath18 will send its @xmath120th pulse . it can be a function of the current value of @xmath121 and past pulse arrival times . this function basically determines how any node @xmath18 reacts to the arrival of a pulse . the system model that we presented thus far is powerful because it is very general . in this section we show that it is a generalization of the pulse - coupled oscillator model proposed by mirollo and strogatz @xcite . as a result , the results presented in that paper will hold under the simplified version of our model . in setting up the system model , mirollo and strogatz make four key assumptions : * pathloss model : the first assumption that is made is that there is all - to - all coupling among all @xmath9 oscillators . this means that each oscillator s transmission can be heard by all other oscillators . thus , for our model we ignore pathloss , i.e. @xmath122 , to allow any node s transmission to be heard by each of the other @xmath123 nodes . * delay model : the second assumption is that there is instantaneous coupling . this assumption is the same as setting @xmath124 . in such a situation we would use our pathloss only model . * synchronization pulses : the third key assumption made in @xcite is that there is non - uniform coupling , meaning that each of the @xmath9 oscillators fire with strengths @xmath125 . we modify the parameters in our model by making node @xmath18 transmit with magnitude @xmath126 . they also assume that any two pulses transmitted at different times will be seen by an oscillator as two separate pulses . in our model , we may choose any pulse @xmath28 that has an arbitrarily short duration and each node will detect the pulse arrival time and pulse magnitude . * clock model : the fourth important assumption made by mirollo and strogatz is that the oscillators are identical but they start in arbitrary initial conditions . we simplify our clock model in ( [ eq : clock ] ) by eliminating any timing jitter , i.e. @xmath127 , and making the clocks identical by setting @xmath128 for @xmath129 . we leave @xmath47 in the model to account for the arbitrary initial conditions . we also assume that the phase variable in the pulse - coupled oscillator model increases at the same rate as our clock . that is , the time it takes the phase variable to go from zero to one and the time it takes our clock to count from one integer value to the next are the same . now that we have identical system models , what remains is to modify our model to mimic the coupling action detailed in @xcite . this is accomplished by defining a proper pulse - connection function @xmath119 . to match the coupling action in @xcite , we choose a pulse transmit time function @xmath130 that is a function of pulse receive times and also the time of node @xmath18 s @xmath131th pulse transmission time . @xmath132 is the time in terms of @xmath40 that node @xmath18 receives its @xmath65th pulse since its last pulse transmission at @xmath133 . in this case , @xmath119 will be a function that updates node @xmath18 s @xmath120th pulse transmission time each time node @xmath18 receives a pulse . let @xmath134 where it is node @xmath18 s @xmath120th pulse transmission time after observing @xmath65 pulses since its last pulse transmission . node @xmath18 will transmit its pulse as soon as @xmath135 where @xmath121 is node @xmath18 s current time . as soon as the node transmits a pulse at @xmath119 the function will reset and become @xmath136 . the node is now ready to receive pulses and at its first received pulse , the next transmission time will become @xmath137 . @xmath119 will thus be defined as @xmath138 , \qquad k>0\\ x_{n , i}^{c_{i}}(0 ) & = & x_{n-1,i}^{c_{i}}+1 \label{eq : pco_estimator2}\end{aligned}\ ] ] where the pulse received at @xmath132 is a pulse of magnitude @xmath139 and the function @xmath1\to [ 0,1]$ ] is the smooth , monotonic increasing , and concave down function defined in @xcite . equations ( [ eq : pco_estimator ] ) and ( [ eq : pco_estimator2 ] ) fundamentally say that each time node @xmath18 receives a pulse , node @xmath18 s next transmission time will be adjusted . this is in line with the behavior of the coupling model described by mirollo and strogatz since each time an oscillator receives a pulse , its state variable is pulled up by @xmath140 thus adjusting the time at which the oscillator will next fire . to see how equations ( [ eq : pco_estimator ] ) and ( [ eq : pco_estimator2 ] ) relate to the coupling model in @xcite , let us consider an example with two pulse coupled oscillators . consider two oscillators @xmath57 and @xmath141 illustrated in fig . [ fig : strogatzmodel ] . in fig . [ fig : strogatzmodel](a ) , we have that oscillator @xmath57 is at phase @xmath142 and oscillator @xmath141 is just about to fire . below the pulse - coupled oscillator model we have a time axis for node @xmath18 corresponding to our clock model going from time @xmath133 to @xmath143 . our time axis for node @xmath18 models the behavior of oscillator @xmath57 , that is , we want node @xmath18 to behave in the same way as oscillator @xmath57 under the influence of oscillator @xmath141 . if oscillator @xmath141 did not exist , then the phase variable @xmath142 will match our clock in that @xmath142 reaches @xmath42 at the same time our clock reaches @xmath144 and oscillator @xmath57 will fire at the same time our model fires . in fig . [ fig : strogatzmodel](b ) , oscillator @xmath141 has fired and has pulled the state variable of oscillator @xmath57 up by @xmath140 . this coupling has effectively pushed the phase of oscillator @xmath57 to @xmath145 and decreased the time before @xmath57 fires . in fact , the time until oscillator @xmath57 fires again is decreased by @xmath56 . we can capture this coupling in our model since we can calculate the lost time @xmath56 . the time at which oscillator @xmath141 fires is @xmath146 and it is clear that @xmath147 . thus , if the time that oscillator @xmath57 will fire again is decreased by time @xmath56 due to the pulse of @xmath141 , then we adjust our node firing time by decreasing the firing time to @xmath148 . this is exactly the expression in ( [ eq : pco_estimator ] ) for @xmath149 . this relationship between our model for calculating the node firing time and the pulse - coupled oscillator coupling model can be easily extended to @xmath9 oscillators . we can see then that the pulse - coupled oscillator model proposed by mirollo and strogatz in @xcite is a special case of our model . our model generalizes this pulse - coupled oscillator model by considering timing jitter , pulses of finite width , propagation delay , non - identical clocks , and an ability to accommodate arbitrary coupling functions . just as we could specialize our model to the pulse - coupled oscillator model of mirollo and strogatz , we now specialize the model for our proposed synchronization technique . we start under the assumption of no propagation delay and develop the synchronization technique for this case . propagation delay is considered in section [ sec : timedelay ] . we proceed in three steps . in section [ sec : signal - reception ] , we specify the model for @xmath150 , the received waveform at any node @xmath29 . second , in section [ sec : pulseproperties ] , we prove that given certain characteristics of the model , @xmath150 has very useful limiting properties . third , we show in section [ sec : timesynchronization ] that estimators ( i.e. , the pulse connection function ) developed for our synchronization technique give @xmath150 the desired properties . for our synchronization technique , we specialize the general model by making the following assumptions on @xmath51 and @xmath52 for @xmath151 : * a characterization of the @xmath152 is given by a known function @xmath153 with @xmath154 $ ] that gives the percentage of nodes with any given @xmath155 value . thus , the fraction of nodes with @xmath155 values in the range @xmath156 to @xmath157 can be found by integrating @xmath153 from @xmath156 to @xmath157 . we assume that @xmath158 , for some constant @xmath159 . we keep this function constant as we increase the number of nodes in the network ( @xmath37 ) . given any circle of radius @xmath95 that intersects the network , the nodes within that circle will have @xmath51 s that are characterized by @xmath153 . @xmath95 is the maximum @xmath56 such that @xmath160 . this means that the set of nodes that any node @xmath29 will hear from will have its @xmath51 s characterized by a known function . note that @xmath95 can be infinite , and in that case , any node @xmath29 hears from all nodes in the network . fundamentally , @xmath153 means that as we increase node density , the new nodes have @xmath155 parameters that are well distributed in a predictable manner . * @xmath52 is a zero mean gaussian process with samples @xmath161 , for any @xmath162 , and independent and identically distributed samples for any set of times @xmath163 $ ] , @xmath65 a positive integer . we assume @xmath164 and note that @xmath165 is defined in terms of the clock of node @xmath18 . we assume that @xmath52 is gaussian since the rms ( root mean square ) jitter is characterized by the gaussian distribution @xcite . we maintain the full generality of the pathloss model from section [ sec : prop - model ] . note that throughout this work we assume no transmission delay or time - stamping error . this means that a pulse is transmitted at exactly the time the node intends to transmit it . we make this assumption since there will be no delay in message construction or access time @xcite because our nodes broadcast the same simple pulse without worrying about collisions . also , when a node receives a pulse it can determine its clock reading without delay since any time stamping error is small and can be absorbed into the random jitter . for our proposed synchronization technique , the aggregate waveform seen by node @xmath29 at any time @xmath78 is @xmath166 where @xmath150 is the waveform seen at node @xmath29 written in the time scale of @xmath43 and @xmath167 for all @xmath18 . @xmath35 is the maximum transmit magnitude of a node . @xmath33 is the random timing offset suffered by the @xmath18th node , which encompasses the random clock jitter and estimation error . this model says that each node @xmath18 s pulse transmission occurs at the ideal transmit time @xmath32 plus some random error @xmath33 . in the next section , section [ sec : pulseproperties ] , we find properties for @xmath33 that will give us desirable properties in @xmath150 . then , in section [ sec : timesynchronization ] , we show that our proposed steady - state synchronization technique and its associated pulse - connection function will give us the desired properties . there are two comments about ( [ eq : timesync - aggwaveform ] ) that we want to make . first , note that even though we sum the transmissions from all @xmath9 nodes in ( [ eq : timesync - aggwaveform ] ) , we do not assume that node @xmath29 can hear all nodes in the network . recall from the pathloss model that if we have a multi - hop network , then there will be a nonzero probability that @xmath168 . thus , node @xmath29 will not hear from the nodes whose transmissions have zero magnitude . second , it may be possible that the nodes are told that there are @xmath169 nodes in the network while the actual number of functioning nodes is @xmath9 . in which case , each node will transmit with signal magnitude @xmath170 and ( [ eq : timesync - aggwaveform ] ) will have a factor of @xmath171 . other than for this factor , however , the theoretical results that follow are not affected . to model the quality of the reception of @xmath150 by node @xmath29 , we model the reception of a signal by defining a threshold @xmath172 . @xmath172 is the received signal threshold required for nodes to perfectly resolve the pulse arrival time . if the maximum received signal magnitude is less than @xmath172 then the node does not make any observations and ignores the received signal waveform . we assume that @xmath173 . in our work we will assume that @xmath28 takes on the shape @xmath174 where @xmath175 is expressed in terms of @xmath43 . we assume @xmath176 for @xmath177 , @xmath178 only on @xmath179 , @xmath180 , and @xmath181 is uniformly continuous on @xmath182 . thus , we see that @xmath28 has at most three jump discontinuities ( at @xmath183 ) . @xmath184 should be chosen large compared to @xmath185 , i.e. @xmath186 , where @xmath187 is the value of @xmath165 translated from the time scale of @xmath40 to @xmath43 . this way , over each synchronization phase , with high probability a zero - crossing will occur . for each node , the duration in terms of @xmath43 of a synchronization phase will be @xmath188 . note that we assume @xmath184 is a value that is constant in any consistent time scale . this means that even though nodes have different clocks , identical pulses are transmitted by all nodes . we define a pulse to be transmitted at time @xmath78 if the pulse makes a zero - crossing at time @xmath78 . similarly , we define the _ pulse receive ( arrival ) time _ for a node as the time when the observed waveform first makes a zero - crossing . a _ zero - crossing _ is defined for signals that have a positive amplitude and then transition to a negative amplitude . it is the time that the signal first reaches zero . for the exchange of synchronization pulses , we assume that nodes can transmit pulses and receive signals at the same time . this simplifying assumption is not required for the ideas presented here to hold , but simplifies the presentation . we mention a way to relax this assumption in section [ sec : nosimulttxrx ] . in ( [ eq : timesync - aggwaveform ] ) and in the discussions above , we have focused on characterizing the aggregate waveform for any one synchronization phase . that is , ( [ eq : timesync - aggwaveform ] ) is the waveform seen by any node @xmath29 for the synchronization phase centered around node @xmath42 s transmission at @xmath189 , @xmath32 a positive integer . we can , however , describe a synchronization pulse train in the following form , @xmath190 where @xmath191 is the integer value of @xmath78 at the @xmath192th synchronization phase , and @xmath193 is the error suffered by the @xmath18th node in the @xmath192th synchronization phase . we seek to create this pulse train with equispaced zero - crossings and use each zero - crossing as a synchronization event . an illustration of such a pulse train is shown in fig . [ fig : pulsetrain ] . for simplicity , however , most of the theoretical work is carried out on one synchronization phase . in this section , we characterize the properties of @xmath33 that give us desirable properties in the aggregate waveform . from ( [ eq : timesync - aggwaveform ] ) , the aggregate waveform seen at each node @xmath29 in the network has the form @xmath194 we have dropped the @xmath29 and @xmath43 for notational simplicity since in this section we deal solely with the received waveform at a node @xmath29 in the time scale of @xmath43 . as we let the number of nodes grow unbounded ( @xmath37 ) , the properties of this limit waveform can be characterized by theorem [ theorem : main ] . these properties will be essential for asymptotic cooperative time synchronization . as a note , in theorem [ theorem : main ] we present the case for gaussian distributed @xmath33 but similar results hold for arbitrary zero - mean , symmetrically distributed @xmath33 with finite variance . [ theorem : main ] let @xmath28 be as defined in equation ( [ eq : poft ] ) and @xmath195 with @xmath196 a constant and @xmath197 for all @xmath18 , @xmath141 a constant . also , let @xmath198 be defined as in section [ sec : prop - model ] and be independent from @xmath33 for all @xmath18 . then , @xmath199 has the properties * @xmath200 , * @xmath201 for @xmath202 , and @xmath203 for @xmath204 for some @xmath205 . * @xmath206 is odd around @xmath189 , i.e. @xmath207 for @xmath208 * @xmath209 is continuous . @xmath210 the properties outlined in theorem [ theorem : main ] will be key to the synchronization mechanism we describe . the specific value of @xmath211 will be determined by our choice of the pulse - connection function . before we prove theorem [ theorem : main ] in section [ sec : theoremproof ] we develop and motivate a few important related lemmas . at time @xmath212 , we have that @xmath213 where @xmath214 . we have the mean of @xmath215 being @xmath216 where @xmath217 is the gaussian pdf @xmath218 it is clear that the @xmath215 s , for different @xmath18 s , do not have the same mean and do not have the same variance since the two quantities depend on the @xmath51 value . since the @xmath51 s are characterized by @xmath153 ( defined in section [ sec : systemparameters ] ) , we write the gaussian distribution for @xmath8 as @xmath219 and @xmath215 is in fact a function of @xmath220 as well , denoted @xmath221 . using @xmath222 and @xmath221 , the notation makes it clear that we can average over the @xmath51 s that are characterized by @xmath153 . we use the results of lemmas [ lemma : polarity_positive ] and [ lemma : polarity_negative ] to prove the polarity result for @xmath206 in section [ sec : theoremproof ] . [ lemma : polarity_positive ] given the sequence of independent random variables @xmath215 with @xmath223 , @xmath224 , and @xmath225 . then , for all @xmath18 , @xmath226 @xmath227 for some constants @xmath228 , @xmath229 , and @xmath230 and @xmath231 almost surely , where @xmath232 [ lemma : polarity_negative ] given the sequence of independent random variables @xmath215 with @xmath233 , @xmath224 , and @xmath225 . then , for all @xmath18 , @xmath234 @xmath235 for some constants @xmath228 , @xmath229 , and @xmath230 and @xmath236 almost surely , where @xmath237 the results of lemma [ lemma : polarity_positive ] and lemma [ lemma : polarity_negative ] are intuitive since given that @xmath28 is odd and the gaussian noise distribution is symmetric , it makes sense for @xmath206 to have properties similar to an odd waveform . since the proofs of the two lemmas are very similar , we only prove lemma [ lemma : polarity_positive ] . the proof can be found in the appendix . knowing only the polarity of @xmath206 is not entirely satisfying since we would also expect that the limiting waveform be continuous . the proof of lemma [ lemma : continuity1 ] is once again left for the appendix . [ lemma : continuity1 ] using @xmath28 in ( [ eq : poft ] ) , @xmath238 is a continuous function of @xmath78 , where @xmath239 we can proceed in a straightforward manner to show that @xmath240 . for @xmath241 , @xmath242 where @xmath243 . since our goal is to apply some form of the strong law of large numbers , we first examine the mean of @xmath244 . we have that @xmath245 @xmath246 @xmath247 . furthermore , @xmath248 since @xmath249 is odd and @xmath217 is even because it is zero - mean gaussian . thus , @xmath250 . we next consider the variance of @xmath244 : @xmath251 where we have used the fact that @xmath252 and @xmath253 . from the preceding discussion we see that the @xmath244 s are a sequence of zero mean , finite ( but possibly different ) variance random variables . from stark and woods @xcite , we know that if @xmath254 , then we have strong convergence of the @xmath244 s : @xmath255 with probability-1 as @xmath37 . but it is easy to see that @xmath256 so the condition is satisfied . as a result , @xmath257 as @xmath258 . we have that @xmath206 is continuous from lemma [ lemma : continuity1 ] . thus , next we need to show that @xmath201 for @xmath259 , and @xmath203 for @xmath260 for some @xmath261 . we show the case for @xmath262 by simply applying lemma [ lemma : polarity_positive ] . since lemma [ lemma : polarity_positive ] holds for all @xmath223 , there clearly exists a @xmath263 such @xmath264 for @xmath259 . the case for @xmath265 comes similarly from lemma [ lemma : polarity_negative ] . lastly , it remains to be shown that @xmath206 is odd around @xmath189 . this , however , is evident from the form of @xmath266 . since @xmath222 is even in @xmath267 about @xmath41 and @xmath249 is odd about @xmath41 , it is clear that @xmath268 as a function of @xmath78 is odd about @xmath32 . thus , @xmath266 is odd around @xmath32 . this then completes the proof for theorem [ theorem : main ] . in this work we want to show that as we let @xmath37 then we can recover deterministic parameters that allow for time synchronization . such a result would provide rigorous theoretical support for a new trade - off between network density and synchronization performance . to simplify the study , we focus on the steady - state time synchronization properties of asymptotically dense networks . in particular , we develop a cooperative technique that constructs a sequence of equispaced zero - crossings seen by all nodes which allows the network to maintain time synchronization indefinitely given that the nodes start with a collection of equispaced zero - crossings . starting with a few equispaced zero - crossings allows us to avoid the complexities of starting up the synchronization process but still allows us to show that spatial averaging can be used to average out timing errors . if we are able to maintain indefinitely a sequence of equispaced zero - crossing using cooperative time synchronization , then it means that spatial averaging can average out all uncertainties in the system as we let node density grow unbounded . this recovery of deterministic parameters is our desired result . here , we overview the estimators needed for cooperative time synchronization . let @xmath269 be the time , with respect to clock @xmath270 , that the @xmath18th node sees its @xmath120th pulse . in dealing with the steady - state properties , we start by assuming that each node @xmath18 in the network has observed a sequence of @xmath271 pulse arrival times , @xmath272 , that occur at integer values of @xmath78 , @xmath271 is an integer . recall that @xmath272 is defined as a set of @xmath271 pulse arrival times in the time scale of @xmath40 . therefore , even though @xmath272 occur at integer values of @xmath78 ( the time scale of @xmath43 ) , these values are not necessarily integers since they are in the time scale of @xmath40 . note also that in our model the pulse arrival time is a zero - crossing location . using these @xmath271 pulse arrival times , each node @xmath18 has two distinct , yet closely related tasks . the first task is time synchronization . to achieve time synchronization , node @xmath18 wants to use these @xmath271 pulse arrival times to make an estimate of when the next zero - crossing will occur . if it can estimate this next zero - crossing time , then it can effectively estimate the next integer value of @xmath78 . this estimator can then be extended to estimate arbitrary times in the future which gives node @xmath18 the ability to synchronize to node @xmath42 . the second task is that node @xmath18 needs to transmit a pulse so that the sum of all pulses from the @xmath9 nodes in the network will create an aggregate waveform that , in the limit as @xmath37 , will give a zero - crossing at the next integer value of @xmath78 . this second task is very significant because if the aggregate waveform gives the exact location of the next integer value of @xmath78 , then each node @xmath18 in the network can use this new zero - crossing along with @xmath273 to form a set of @xmath271 zero - crossing locations . this new set can then be used to predict the next zero - crossing location as well as node @xmath18 s next pulse transmission time . recall that determining the pulse transmission time is the job of the pulse - connection function @xmath119 . with such a setup , synchronization would be maintained indefinitely . the zero - crossings that always occur at integer values of @xmath78 would provide node @xmath18 a sequence of synchronization events and also illustrate how cooperation is averaging out all random errors . the waveform properties detailed in theorem [ theorem : main ] play a central role in accomplishing the nodes task of cooperatively generating an aggregate waveform with a zero - crossing at the next integer value of @xmath78 . from ( [ eq : waveformgeneralform ] ) , if the arrival time of any pulse at a node @xmath29 is a random variable of the form @xmath274 , where @xmath32 is the next integer value of @xmath78 and @xmath33 is zero - mean gaussian ( or in general any symmetric random variable with zero - mean and finite variance ) , then theorem [ theorem : main ] tells us that the aggregate waveform will make a zero - crossing at the next integer value of @xmath78 . this idea is illustrated in fig . [ fig : example ] . thus , for achieving time synchronization in an asymptotically dense network we need to address two issues . first , we need to develop an estimator for the next integer value of @xmath78 given a sequence of @xmath271 pulse arrival times that occur at integer values of @xmath78 . we will call this the _ time synchronization estimator _ and let us write @xmath275 as the time synchronization estimator that determines the time , in the time scale of @xmath40 , when node @xmath18 predicts it will see its @xmath120th zero - crossing . two , we need to develop the pulse - connection function @xmath119 such that node @xmath18 s transmitted pulse will arrive at a node @xmath29 with the random properties described in theorem [ theorem : main ] . here we establish the conditions for estimating the next pulse arrival time , or equivalently the next integer value of @xmath78 , given @xmath271 pulse arrival times . these conditions apply most directly to the time synchronization estimator @xmath275 since we want to synchronize in some desired manner . the problem of synchronization is the challenge of having the @xmath18th node accurately and precisely predict when the next integer value of @xmath78 will occur . in our setup , the reception of a pulse by node @xmath18 tells it of such an event . let us explicitly model the time at an integer value of @xmath78 in terms of the clock of node @xmath18 . assume @xmath32 is an integer value of @xmath78 and at this time , node @xmath18 will observe its @xmath120th pulse . thus , from ( [ eq : clock ] ) we have that @xmath276 the equation makes use of the clock model of node @xmath18 ( [ eq : clock ] ) to tell us the time at clock @xmath40 when node @xmath42 is at @xmath32 , where @xmath32 is an integer in the time scale of @xmath43 . we are also starting with the assumption that the zero - crossing that occurs at an integer value of @xmath78 is observed by node @xmath18 at this time . from ( [ eq : state - eqns ] ) we see that the pulse receive time at node @xmath18 , @xmath277 , is a gaussian random variable whose mean is parameterized by the unknown vector @xmath278 $ ] . thus , to achieve synchronization node @xmath18 will try to estimate the random variable @xmath277 using a series of @xmath271 pulse receive times as observations ( recall that @xmath271 is known ) . note that the observations are also random variables with distributions parameterized by @xmath279 . we want the time synchronization estimator of node @xmath18 to make an estimate of @xmath277 , denoted @xmath280 which is a function of past observations @xmath281 , that meets the following criteria : @xmath282 = e_{\vartheta}(t_{n , i}^{c_{i } } ) \label{eq : opt1}\ ] ] @xmath283 \label{eq : opt2}\ ] ] for all @xmath279 . the subscript @xmath279 means that the expectation is taken over the distributions involved given any possible @xmath279 . the first condition comes from the fact that given a finite @xmath271 , it is reasonable to want the expected value of the estimate to be the expected value of the random variable being estimated for all @xmath279 . as in the justification for unbiased estimators , this condition eliminates unreasonable estimators so that the chosen estimator will perform well , on average , for all values of @xmath279 @xcite . the second condition is the result of seeking to minimize the mean squared error between the estimate and the random variable being estimated for all @xmath279 . for the time synchronization estimator , node @xmath18 will seek to estimate @xmath277 given @xmath272 . from ( [ eq : state - eqns ] ) , we see that @xmath284^{t}$ ] is a jointly gaussian random vector parameterized by @xmath279 . recall that we assume @xmath52 is a zero mean gaussian process with independent and identically distributed samples @xmath285 , for any @xmath78 . also , since we re assuming that the zero - crossings at node @xmath18 occur at consecutive integer values of @xmath78 , the random variable @xmath286 is gaussian with @xmath287 for some @xmath288 $ ] . we also notice that @xmath289 since each noise sample is independent , we see that the distribution of @xmath290 parameterized by @xmath279 can be written as @xmath291 where @xmath292\ ] ] and @xmath293 . as a result , for any @xmath271 consecutive observations , we can simplify notation by using the model @xmath294 where @xmath295^{t } = [ t_{n - m , i}^{c_{i } } \quad t_{n - m+1,i}^{c_{i } } \dots t_{n-1,i}^{c_{i}}]^{t}$ ] and @xmath296 = \left [ \begin{array}{c } \alpha_{i}(\tau_{0}-m-\bar{\delta}_{i})\\ \alpha_{i } \end{array } \right]\ ] ] with @xmath297^t\ ] ] and @xmath298^{t}$ ] . since @xmath52 is a gaussian noise process , @xmath299 with @xmath293 . using the simplified notation in ( [ eq : simple - obs ] ) , we want to estimate @xmath300 , where @xmath300 is jointly distributed with @xmath301 as @xmath302 \sim { \mathcal n } ( \left [ \begin{array}{c } { \mathbf m}\\ \theta_{1}+m\theta_{2 } \end{array } \right ] , \left [ \begin{array}{cc } \sigma & 0\\ 0 & \sigma^{2 } \end{array } \right]).\ ] ] using this notation , we can rewrite the synchronization criteria as : @xmath303=e_{\theta}(y_{m+1})\ ] ] @xmath304,\ ] ] where @xmath305 is the estimator for @xmath300 . condition ( [ eq : opt1-simple ] ) implies that our estimate must be unbiased . condition ( [ eq : opt2-simple ] ) is equivalent to @xmath306.\ ] ] to see this equivalence , note that @xmath307 } \nonumber \\ & = & e_{\theta}\big[(\hat{y}_{m+1}(y_{1 } , y_{2 } , \dots , y_{m})-(\theta_{1}+m\theta_{2})-w_{m+1 } ) ^{2}\big ] \nonumber \\ & = & e_{\theta}\big[(\hat{y}_{m+1}(y_{1 } , y_{2 } , \dots , y_{m})- ( \theta_{1}+m\theta_{2 } ) ) ^{2}\big]+e\big [ w_{m+1}^{2}\big],\end{aligned}\ ] ] where the last inequality follows from the independence of @xmath308 from all other noise samples . since the distribution of of @xmath308 is independent of @xmath309 , @xmath310 } \nonumber \\ & = & \textrm{argmin}_{\hat{y}_{m+1 } } e_{\theta}\big[(\hat{y}_{m+1}(y_{1 } , y_{2 } , \dots , y_{m})- ( \theta_{1}+m\theta_{2 } ) ) ^{2}\big ] \nonumber.\end{aligned}\ ] ] with these two conditions , from @xcite we see that the desired estimate for @xmath300 will be the uniformly minimum variance unbiased ( umvu ) estimator for @xmath311 . using the above linear model , from @xcite we know the maximum likelihood ( ml ) estimate of @xmath309 , @xmath312 , is given by @xmath313 this estimate achieves the cramer rao lower bound , hence is efficient . the fisher information matrix is @xmath314 and @xmath315 . this means that @xmath312 is umvu . again from @xcite , the invariance of the ml estimate tells us that the ml estimate for @xmath316 is @xmath317 . first , it is clear that @xmath318 , where @xmath319 $ ] . as a result , we first see that @xmath320 so @xmath321 is unbiased . next , to see that @xmath321 is also minimum variance we compare its variance to the lower bound . @xmath322 the extension of the cramer rao lower bound in @xcite to a function of parameters tells us that @xmath323 with @xmath324 . in this case , @xmath325 $ ] so the lower bound to the mean squared error is @xmath326 as a result , we see that @xmath321 is umvu . since @xmath321 is the desired estimate of where the next pulse arrival time will be , it is the time synchronization estimator . thus , @xmath327 note that @xmath328 has a variance that goes to zero as @xmath329 . we now need to develop the pulse - connection function so that the conditions for @xmath33 in theorem [ theorem : main ] are satisfied . recall we are developing the synchronization technique under the assumption of no propagation delay , i.e. @xmath330 . given a sequence of @xmath271 pulse arrival times , the time synchronization estimator @xmath275 given in ( [ eq : timesync - estimator ] ) gives each node the ability to predict the next integer value of @xmath78 . what remains to be considered is the second part of the synchronization process : developing a pulse - connection function @xmath119 such that the aggregate waveform seen by a node @xmath29 will have the properties described in theorem [ theorem : main ] . let us first consider the distribution of @xmath275 . from ( [ eq : timesync - estimator - distribution ] ) , we have that @xmath331 using ( [ eq : clock ] ) , we can translate @xmath332 into the time scale of @xmath43 as @xmath333 which gives @xmath334 this means that @xmath335 under our assumption of @xmath330 , any transmission by node @xmath18 will be instantaneously seen by any node @xmath29 . as a result , the random variable @xmath336 will be seen as the pulse arrival time at node @xmath29 , in the time scale of @xmath43 . due to the assumption of no propagation delay , defining @xmath337 will give us the desired properties in the aggregate waveform . to see this , let us compare the distribution of @xmath338 to the assumptions of theorem [ theorem : main ] . since @xmath32 is the ideal crossing time in the time scale of @xmath43 , we have @xmath339 therefore , we see that @xmath340 where @xmath211 from theorem [ theorem : main ] is @xmath341 we have shown that using the pulse connection function @xmath337 satisfies the conditions of theorem [ theorem : main ] . thus , all the results of the theorem apply . as a result , we have established a time synchronization estimator @xmath336 and a pulse - connection function @xmath338 . in the case of @xmath330 , we have that @xmath337 , or in the time scale of @xmath40 , @xmath342 . when each node in the network uses the pulse - connection function @xmath343 we have a resulting aggregate waveform that has a zero - crossing at the next integer value of @xmath78 as @xmath37 . this fact follows from applying theorem [ theorem : main ] . thus , we have an asymptotic steady - state time synchronization method that can maintain a sequence of equispaced zero - crossings occurring at integer values of @xmath78 . an interesting feature of this synchronization technique is that no node needs to know any information about its location or its surrounding neighbors . before ending this section , let us comment on the assumption of simultaneous transmission and reception . one way to relax this assumption is to divide the network into two disjoint sets of nodes , say the odd numbered nodes and the even numbered nodes , where each set is still uniformly distributed over the area . then , the odd nodes and the even nodes will take turns transmitting and receiving . for example , the odd numbered nodes can transmit pulses at odd values of @xmath78 and the even numbered nodes will listen . the even numbered nodes will then transmit pulses at the even values of @xmath78 and the odd numbered nodes will listen . with such a scheme , nodes do not transmit and receive pulses simultaneously , but can still take advantage of spatial averaging . the odd numbered nodes will see an aggregate waveform generated by a subset of the even numbered nodes and the even numbered nodes will receive a waveform cooperatively generated by the odd numbered nodes . let us take a more detailed look at this scheme . in fig . [ fig : nosimulttxrx ] we assume that @xmath32 is an even integer value of @xmath78 and use @xmath344 . each even numbered node will use the aggregate signals occurring at @xmath345 , @xmath346 , and @xmath347 to estimate @xmath32 and cooperatively the even nodes will generate the aggregate signal at @xmath32 . the odd numbered nodes will then use the aggregate signals occurring at @xmath348 , @xmath349 , and @xmath32 to generate the aggregate signal at @xmath350 . therefore , the odd and even numbered nodes can take turns transmitting and receiving signals and nodes never need to simultaneously transmit and receive . of course , such a setup would require a modification of the estimators used by the nodes . nodes will receive a vector of @xmath271 observations @xmath351 with @xmath352 = \alpha_{i}(\tau_{0}+1 - 2(m - l)-\bar{\delta}_{i})+\psi_{i}$ ] for @xmath353 . with such a mechanism , the @xmath354 matrix in equation ( [ eq : simple - obs ] ) would change to @xmath355^t\ ] ] and @xmath309 becomes @xmath296 = \left [ \begin{array}{c } \alpha_{i}(\tau_{0}+1 - 2m-\bar{\delta}_{i})\\ \alpha_{i } \end{array } \right].\ ] ] to estimate the location @xmath32 in the time scale of @xmath40 , we can proceed as in section [ sec : timesyncestimator ] : @xmath356 will be distributed @xmath357 and @xmath312 is umvu . this leads to the umvu estimate @xmath358 , where @xmath359 $ ] , and @xmath360 . in this case , the variance of @xmath321 will be @xmath361 , and thus we have that @xmath362 converted to the time scale of @xmath43 we have @xmath363 comparing equations ( [ eq : comptonosimult ] ) and ( [ eq : nosimult ] ) , we see that they have the same form . as a result , we can again set @xmath342 and achieve cooperative time synchronization . we now extend the ideas of cooperative time synchronization to the situation where signals suffer not only from pathloss but also propagation delay . it turns out that the effect of propagation delay can also be addressed using the concept we have been using throughout this paper averaging out errors using the large number of nodes in the network . in this section , we use the pathloss and propagation delay model detailed in section [ sec : delay - model ] . we introduce a time delay function @xmath83 . for generality , we explicitly model a multi - hop network where we have a @xmath53 function that is zero for @xmath56 greater than some distance @xmath95 , i.e. @xmath364 for @xmath365 . such a model implies that the aggregate signal seen at any node @xmath29 is influenced only by the set of nodes inside a circle of radius @xmath95 centered at node @xmath29 . with this we can effectively divide the network into two disjoint sets , a set of _ interior nodes _ and a set of _ boundary nodes_. an interior node @xmath29 is defined to be a node whose distance from the nearest network boundary is greater than or equal to @xmath95 . a boundary node is thus defined to be a node that is a distance less than @xmath95 away from the nearest network boundary . we make this distinction since the synchronization technique for each set of nodes is different . please note that if a pathloss function where @xmath364 for @xmath365 is unreasonable , then we simply choose @xmath95 to be infinite and consider all nodes in the network to be boundary nodes . using the propagation delay model , @xmath116 will obviously modify the general received aggregate waveform seen at any node @xmath29 . in fact , equation ( [ eq : timesync - aggwaveform ] ) will now be written as @xmath366 for @xmath9 large , this model will give an accurate characterization of the aggregate waveform seen at node @xmath29 . from equation ( [ eq : timesync - aggwaveform - withdelay ] ) , it is clear that the aggregate waveform will not have a zero - crossing at @xmath32 for every node @xmath29 because of the presence of the @xmath116 random variables . therefore , to average out propagation delay , the idea we employ is to have each node introduce a _ random _ artificial time shift that counteracts the effect of the time delay random variable . more precisely , we want to introduce another random variable @xmath367 such that @xmath368 will have zero mean and a symmetric distribution . at the same time , we assume each node knows @xmath97 and @xmath99 and will also introduce an artificial scaling factor @xmath369 to simplify the analysis of the aggregate waveform . this means that instead of using the scaling factor @xmath370 , each node @xmath18 will scale its transmitted pulse by @xmath371 . for the motivation in this section , let us assume that node @xmath29 is an interior node . to find the distribution of @xmath367 , we consider the following . @xmath82 has density @xmath115 and let @xmath372 be the density of @xmath367 . since @xmath82 and @xmath367 are independent , we know that the density of @xmath373 , @xmath374 , will be the convolution of @xmath115 and @xmath372 . therefore , by the properties of the convolution function , if we set @xmath375 , then we have that @xmath374 is symmetric , i.e. @xmath376 . as well , since @xmath82 has finite expectation , it is easy to see that @xmath377 . given a sequence of @xmath271 zero - crossings that we know to be occurring at integers of @xmath78 , we can still use @xmath336 ( from ( [ eq : timesync - estimator ] ) in the time scale of node @xmath42 ) as the time synchronization estimator . however , with propagation delay , the pulse - connection function will now be @xmath378 . with @xmath367 and @xmath379 included , we can rewrite equation ( [ eq : timesync - aggwaveform - withdelay ] ) as @xmath380 it is important to see that since @xmath82 has the same distribution for _ all _ interior nodes @xmath29 , equation ( [ eq : timesync - aggwaveform - withdelayandfix ] ) holds for every node @xmath29 that is an interior node . this means that for the network to cooperatively generate the waveform in ( [ eq : timesync - aggwaveform - withdelayandfix ] ) each transmit node @xmath18 needs to have the following additional knowledge : ( 1 ) the distribution of @xmath367 whose density is @xmath375 , where @xmath29 is an interior node , and ( 2 ) the functions @xmath97 and @xmath99 to generate @xmath379 . with this knowledge , we can use equation ( [ eq : timesync - aggwaveform - withdelayandfix ] ) to study the aggregate waveform seen at any interior node @xmath29 . in fact , we find that the aggregate waveform has limiting properties that are similar to those outlined in theorem [ theorem : main ] . these properties are described in theorem [ theorem : main - delay ] . [ theorem : main - delay ] let @xmath28 be as defined in equation ( [ eq : poft ] ) and @xmath195 with @xmath196 a constant and @xmath197 for all @xmath18 , @xmath141 a constant . @xmath34 and @xmath116 are defined as in section [ sec : delay - model ] and @xmath367 with density @xmath375 is independent from @xmath116 . @xmath369 and let @xmath116 , @xmath367 , and @xmath33 be mutually independent for all @xmath18 . then , for any interior node @xmath29 with @xmath381 as defined in ( [ eq : timesync - aggwaveform - withdelayandfix ] ) , @xmath382 has the properties * @xmath383 , * @xmath384 is odd around @xmath189 , i.e. @xmath385 for @xmath208 . @xmath210 the proof of theorem [ theorem : main - delay ] is left for the appendix . from the arguments so far , it seems that time synchronization with delay , at least for interior nodes , can be solved simply by modifying the pulse - connection function @xmath386 and changing the scaling factor to @xmath371 . theorem [ theorem : main - delay ] tells us that the limiting aggregate waveform makes a zero - crossing at the next integer value of @xmath78 and the waveform is odd . thus , we can use this zero - crossing as a synchronization event and maintain synchronization in a manner identical to the technique used in the situation without propagation delay . this , however , unfortunately is not the case . in order to implement the above concept , we need to find the random variable , @xmath387 , in the time scale of @xmath40 , that corresponds to @xmath367 such that @xmath388 this means that we need @xmath389 . however , each node @xmath18 can not find @xmath387 that satisfies this since it does not know its @xmath51 . since the @xmath18th node does not know its own value of @xmath51 , to do time synchronization with propagation delay we can have each node estimate its @xmath51 value . however , this estimate will not be perfect and we may no longer have the symmetric limiting aggregate waveform described by theorem [ theorem : main - delay ] . this means that the center zero - crossing might occur some @xmath140 away from @xmath32 , @xmath32 an integer value of @xmath78 . however , steady - state time synchronization can be maintained if the network can use a sequence of @xmath271 equispaced zero - crossings that occur at @xmath390 , where @xmath32 is an integer value of @xmath78 , to cooperatively generate a limiting aggregate waveform that has a zero - crossing at @xmath391 . in such a situation , the network will be able to construct a sequence of equispaced zero - crossings and maintain the occurrence of these zero - crossings indefinitely . the idea is the same as in the case without propagation delay , but the only difference here would be that the zero - crossings do not occur at integer values of @xmath78 . let us give a more formal description of this idea . using notation from section [ sec : timesyncestimator ] , we start with the assumption that each interior node @xmath18 has a sequence of @xmath271 observations that has the form @xmath392 where @xmath393 and @xmath140 is known . to develop the time synchronization estimator @xmath394 and the pulse - connection function @xmath343 , we consider the observations made by each node . if we assume that each node knows the value of @xmath140 , the vector of observations can be written as in ( [ eq : simple - obs ] ) @xmath395 where the matrix @xmath396 in this case is @xmath397^t.\ ] ] using this model , we can follow the development in section [ sec : timesyncestimator ] to find the the time synchronization estimator @xmath398 where @xmath399 $ ] . this estimator will give each node the ability to optimally estimate the next integer value of @xmath78 . note that the variance of the time synchronization estimator is @xmath400 using the time synchronization estimator , we can choose the pulse - connection function as @xmath401 where each time node @xmath18 makes the estimate @xmath402 it also estimates @xmath403 as @xmath404 @xmath405 $ ] . we find that @xmath406 . since , from section [ sec : propdelay_motivation ] , we know we want @xmath389 , we have set @xmath407 . notice that since @xmath387 is simply a realization of @xmath367 multiplied by node @xmath18 s estimate of @xmath51 , node @xmath18 can use the realization of @xmath367 and find @xmath369 . with our choice of @xmath343 in ( [ eq : pulse - connection - propdelay ] ) , we see that @xmath408 where @xmath409 , and @xmath410 . because of the random factor @xmath411 , we see that @xmath412 is no longer a symmetric distribution . as a result , the limiting aggregate waveform @xmath413 may not have a zero - crossing at @xmath189 . thus , if we can find an @xmath140 such that each node @xmath18 using a set of observations of the form ( [ eq : observation_form ] ) allows the network to cooperatively generate the waveform in ( [ eq : aggregate - waveform - timedelay ] ) that has its zero - crossing occurring at @xmath414 ( in the time scale of @xmath43 ) , then we have steady - state time synchronization . this is because the network would be able to use a sequence of @xmath271 observations to generate the next observation that gives the same information as any of the previous observations . thus , by always taking the @xmath271 most recent observations , the process can continue forever and maintain synchronization . each node @xmath18 would need to know distribution of @xmath367 , the value of @xmath140 , and the functions @xmath97 and @xmath99 . therefore , we find that steady - state time synchronization of the interior nodes is possible under certain conditions . as a note , no interior node needs to know any location information . before we consider the synchronization of boundary nodes , we note that the key requirement for each boundary node @xmath18 is to have a pulse - connection function given in equation ( [ eq : pulse - connection - propdelay ] ) . the reason that this must be the pulse - connection for every boundary node @xmath18 is because the analysis for the interior nodes assumes that the aggregate waveform seen by any interior node @xmath29 is created by pulse transmissions occurring at a time determined by ( [ eq : pulse - connection - propdelay ] ) . since the aggregate waveform seen by some interior nodes are created by pulse transmissions from boundary nodes , each boundary node must have the appropriate pulse - connection function . this requirement , however , proves to be extremely problematic and reveals a limitation of the elegant technique of averaging out timing delay when we come to boundaries of the network . the problem comes because @xmath415 already does not have a symmetric distribution if @xmath29 is a boundary node . recall that @xmath416 when @xmath29 is an interior node and @xmath417 when @xmath29 and @xmath77 are both interior nodes . however , @xmath418 when @xmath29 is an interior node and @xmath77 is a boundary node . as a result , @xmath415 is no longer symmetric if @xmath29 is a boundary node . in fact , it is clear that the distribution of @xmath415 is a function of node @xmath29 s location near the boundary . because of this additional asymmetry , let us assume for a moment that the sequence of zero - crossings observed by boundary node @xmath18 occur @xmath419 away from an integer value of @xmath78 . that is , if every node in the network , including the boundary nodes , transmitted a sequence of pulses where each pulse was sent according to ( [ eq : pulse - connection - propdelay ] ) , then boundary node @xmath18 would observe the sequence of observations @xmath420 where @xmath393 and @xmath419 is known . this boundary node @xmath18 could then use the time synchronization estimator given by ( [ eq : timesync - estimator - propdelay ] ) but where the matrix @xmath396 is now replaced with @xmath421 @xmath422^t.\ ] ] thus , for this boundary node @xmath18 we have @xmath423 in this case , however , the variance of the time synchronization estimator depends on @xmath419 @xmath424 the fact that the variance depends on @xmath419 is the root of the problem . the pulse - connection function @xmath425 is _ not _ the same as that given by ( [ eq : pulse - connection - propdelay ] ) . to correct for this , we can make the strong assumption that each boundary node @xmath18 knows is own @xmath51 . we address the reasoning behind this assumption in section [ sec : propdelay_assumption ] . if we use this assumption , then each boundary node @xmath18 can get an observation sequence of the form ( [ eq : observation_form ] ) simply by adding @xmath426 to each of the @xmath271 observations of the form given in ( [ eq : observation_form_boundary ] ) , where we assume that node @xmath18 knows both @xmath140 and @xmath419 . with such an observation sequence , boundary node @xmath18 will have the time synchronization estimator ( [ eq : timesync - estimator - propdelay ] ) and , more importantly , the pulse - connection function ( [ eq : pulse - connection - propdelay ] ) . thus , maintaining time synchronization for the case of propagation delay would be possible . what we have then is that boundary node synchronization would require only the boundary nodes to know their @xmath51 parameters . with this strong assumption only for the boundary nodes , the network is effectively synchronized . even though the boundary nodes do not see the same zero - crossing as the interior nodes , they can calculate this time and thus have all the required synchronization information . the assumption that each boundary node @xmath18 knows @xmath51 is a strong assumption . even though the fraction of nodes that are boundary nodes is small for multi - hop networks requiring many hops to send information across the network , we believe that the assumption is still very artificial . there are two reasons that we make the assumption for the presentation of results on time synchronization with propagation delay . first , the assumption allows us to give an elegant presentation of the main concept of this paper which is to use high node density to average out errors in the network . throughout this work we have used high node density to average out inherent errors present in the nodes . we were able to average out random timing jitter that is present in each node and provide the network with a sequence of zero - crossings that can serve as synchronization events . we then applied this technique to averaging out the errors introduced by time delay . to this end we were partially successful in that the interior nodes can average out these errors assuming the boundary nodes have additional information . but this is of interest since the goal of this paper is to understand the theory of spatial averaging for synchronization and discover its fundamental advantages and limitations . second , the problem encountered at the boundaries is one that opens up an entirely new area of study which is the target of our future work . the issue that we encounter is that the waveform seen by some nodes in the network will have a zero - crossing that is shifted from the ideal location . this implies that different nodes will observe different zero - crossings . furthermore , these zero - crossings will now evolve in time since we do not have the same observations over the entire network . this problem is similar to what we encounter if we consider finite sized networks . for finite @xmath9 , the zero - crossing location will be random and thus introduce another source of error . as well , different nodes will see different zero - crossing locations . therefore , we will turn our attention to the case of finite @xmath9 and develop a different set of tools that will be needed to understand what types of synchronization are achievable under the situation where zero - crossing locations evolve in time . using this understanding , we hope to return to the issue of propagation delay in asymptotically dense networks and characterize the behavior of the network . to conclude , we revisit the scalability issue under the light of work developed in this paper . in the introduction ( section [ sec : estimate - params ] ) , we mentioned that most existing proposals for time synchronization suffer from an inherent scalability problem . the problem with those existing proposals lies in the fact that synchronization errors accumulate : if node 2 can synchronize to node 1 with some small error , and node 3 can synchronize to node 2 with the same small error , these errors accumulate , and the synchronization of node 3 to node 1 is worse . therefore , synchronization error increases with the number of hops in the network , and this problem is especially apparent in the regime of high densities . to make these ideas precise , we first determine the maximum number of hops over which synchronization information must travel and then study how the error in a generic pairwise synchronization mechanism depends on this number of hops . to obtain an estimate for the maximum number of hops @xmath427 in a network in the regime of high densities ( fixed area , @xmath37 ) , we approximate the transmission range of a node by the minimum required transmission distance , @xmath428 , to maintain a fully connected network with high probability . from @xcite , we have that for @xmath9 nodes uniformly distributed over a @xmath429\times [ 0,1]$ ] square , the graph is connected with probability-1 as @xmath37 if and only if each node s transmission distance @xmath428 is such that @xmath430 for some @xmath431 . let us , therefore , approximate @xmath428 as @xmath432 thus , @xmath433 , and thus @xmath434 as @xmath37 . now , we assume there are @xmath435 nodes arranged in a linear ordering , numbered @xmath42 to @xmath435 . to synchronize , each node @xmath18 forms an estimate of its own @xmath51 , based on @xmath271 pulses transmitted from node @xmath436 . as before , node @xmath42 will have the reference clock @xmath44 . node @xmath42 starts by sending @xmath271 pulses at times @xmath437 for @xmath393 . as a result , node @xmath0 will get a vector of observations @xmath438 , where @xmath439 = \alpha_{2}(\tau_{1}-\bar{\delta}_{2})+\psi_{2}$ ] and the @xmath440th element of @xmath438 is @xmath441=\alpha_{2}(\tau_{1}-\bar{\delta}_{2})+l\alpha_{2}+\psi_{2}$ ] . this is similar to the situation we had in ( [ eq : simple - obs ] ) and we can therefore estimate @xmath442 using @xmath443 where @xmath444 $ ] . we find that @xmath445 . node @xmath0 will now transmit @xmath271 pulses at times , in terms of @xmath446 , @xmath447 , for @xmath393 . note that @xmath448 is now a fixed value since node @xmath0 has estimated @xmath442 . in terms of @xmath43 , these pulses occur at @xmath449 for @xmath393 , where @xmath450 . thus , if we translate these times into the time scale of @xmath451 , we will have the vector of observations , @xmath452 , made by node @xmath453 . we find that the @xmath440th element of @xmath452 is @xmath454 = \alpha_{3}((\tau_{2 } + l\frac{\hat{\alpha}_{2}}{\alpha_{2}}- \frac{\psi_{2}}{\alpha_{2}})-\bar{\delta}_{3})+\psi_{3 } \sim { \mathcal n}\bigg(\alpha_{3}(\tau_{2}-\bar{\delta}_{3})+l\alpha_{3}\frac{\hat{\alpha}_{2}}{\alpha_{2 } } , \sigma^{2}\big(\frac{\alpha_{3}^{2}}{\alpha_{2}^{2}}+1\big)\bigg).\ ] ] this vector of observations is of the form @xmath455 where @xmath456 = \left [ \begin{array}{c } \alpha_{3}(\tau_{2}-\bar{\delta}_{3})\\ \alpha_{3}\frac{\hat{\alpha}_{2}}{\alpha_{2 } } \end{array } \right]\ ] ] with @xmath297^t\ ] ] and @xmath298^{t}$ ] . @xmath457 with @xmath458 . with this vector of observations , we can use the estimator @xmath459 where @xmath444 $ ] . we find that @xmath460 if we continue this reasoning , we find that @xmath461 will be the estimate of node @xmath435 . from the above analysis , we see that each node @xmath18 s estimate suffers from jitter variance of the same form . however , there is an accumulation of error because node @xmath18 s estimate has a mean that is dependent on node @xmath436 s estimate . as a result , if node @xmath436 has some small error , then that error will propagate to the estimate of node @xmath18 . a good way to see this is if we consider the special case where @xmath462 . this is the case where the clock frequencies are the same , but nodes do not know this . in this case , we find that node @xmath435 s estimate can be written as @xmath463 where @xmath464 . this is intuitively obvious because node @xmath18 s estimate @xmath403 will be the mean of the gaussian random variable @xmath465 . therefore , it is obvious that the error variance grows linearly with the number of hops . in fact , this behavior is observed in experimental work . with reference broadcast synchronization ( rbs ) , from @xcite the authors find that the synchronization error variance of an @xmath435 hop path is approximately @xmath466 , where @xmath165 is the one hop error variance . therefore , we have that the synchronization error between our two nodes will grow linearly as @xmath467 , which is strictly monotonically increasing . as a result , as @xmath37 , we have that synchronization error will grow unbounded . this scalability problem , however , can potentially be avoided using cooperative time synchronization as @xmath37 . this is because in the limit of infinite density , the cooperative time synchronization technique allows every node in the network to see a set of identical equispaced zero - crossings . as a result , in steady - state the synchronization error does not grow across the network . this comes about by using the high node density to average out random timing errors . thus , we find that cooperative time synchronization has very favorable scalability properties in the limit as @xmath37 . the cooperative synchronization technique described in this paper provides us deterministic parameters that we can use for time synchronization in the limit as node density grows unbounded . in fact , as the node density grows , the observations that can be used for synchronization improve . this means that our cooperative synchronization technique provides an effective trade - off between network density and synchronization performance . such a trade - off has not existed before and will provide network designers an additional dimension over which to improve network synchronization performance . the fundamental idea behind cooperative time synchronization is that by using spatial averaging , the errors inherent in each node can be averaged out . by using observations that are an average " of the information from a large number of surrounding nodes , synchronization performance can be improved due to the higher quality observations . from this point of view , it is clear that the particular technique described in this paper is but one example of using spatial averaging to improve synchronization . other techniques can also be developed using spatial averaging . for example , nodes may not necessarily have to send odd - shaped pulses and use zero - crossing observations . even though this setup takes advantage of the superposition of pulses , it has its drawbacks . to keep the signals in phase , the jitter variance will limit the maximum frequency at which signals can be sent . instead , nodes may transmit ultra wideband pulses . if the nodes surrounding a particular node @xmath29 each transmit an impulse at their estimate of an integer value of @xmath78 , then due to timing errors in the surrounding nodes , node @xmath29 will see a cluster of pulse arrivals around this integer value of @xmath78 . node @xmath29 can then take the sample mean of this cluster of pulses and use that as an observation , just like we used the zero - crossing as an observation in this paper . this idea is illustrated in fig . [ fig : pulsetraincluster ] . such a technique based on ultra wideband pulses will also provide similar scalability properties . as a result , cooperative time synchronization really describes a class of techniques that can take advantage of spatial averaging to improve synchronization performance . with the goal of developing practical cooperative synchronization mechanisms , two keys areas of interest are cooperative synchronization in finite - sized networks and algorithm development . first , the analysis of performance for finite - sized networks is very important . determining when the asymptotic properties presented in this work are good predictors of performance in networks that may be large but still finite in size is important in terms of bridging the gap between our proposed ideas and practical systems . preliminary , simulation - based work along these lines can be found in @xcite . second , developing practical techniques for cooperative time synchronization is essential for implementing spatial averaging in real networks . along these lines , one area of interest is determining what types of pulses should be used , i.e. odd - shaped pulses or ultra wideband pulses . furthermore , the ideas in this paper suggest a few other areas of interest for future work . one is the issue of distributed modulation methods . if we have the ability to generate an aggregate waveform with equispaced zero - crossings , by controlling the location of these crossings we can modulate information onto this waveform and use it to communicate with a far receiver . preliminary work along these lines can be found in @xcite . another issue is to study how the idea of spatial averaging that is so prevalent in this work contributes to synchronization that is observed in nature . * proof of lemma [ lemma : polarity_positive ] . * to show ( [ eqn : cond3a ] ) , we consider @xmath468 since @xmath223 , we have that @xmath469 implying that @xmath249 is shifted to the left and the zero - crossing of @xmath249 occurs at a negative value . @xmath249 is odd about its zero - crossing and @xmath217 is symmetric about zero and strictly monotonically increasing on @xmath470 $ ] for all positive finite variance values . thus , it is clear that @xmath471 which makes @xmath472 . now , the expectation will vary with the variance of @xmath33 and the variance will range from a positive upper bound of @xmath473 to a positive lower bound of @xmath474 , where recall that @xmath211 is a value determined by our choice of the pulse connection function . if we consider @xmath475 to be a function of the variance of @xmath33 , then we see that it is bounded and continuous on the compact domain @xmath476 $ ] . since we showed in the previous paragraph that @xmath472 whenever @xmath33 has a nonzero finite variance , clearly @xmath472 when @xmath477 $ ] . thus , it is clear that @xmath228 and @xmath229 exist and ( [ eqn : cond3a ] ) is shown . to show ( [ eqn : cond3b ] ) , we consider @xmath478 where the second to last inequality follows from the fact that @xmath479 is upper bounded by @xmath42 . the last inequality follows since @xmath480 by the fact that @xmath481 . thus , we have shown ( [ eqn : cond3b ] ) . [ theorem : feller ] the convergence of the series @xmath484 implies that the strong law of large numbers will apply to the sequence of independent random variables @xmath215 . that is , again from @xcite , for every pair @xmath485 , @xmath486 , there corresponds an @xmath9 such that @xmath487 for all @xmath488 . @xmath210 we have shown ( [ eqn : cond3b ] ) so we have @xmath489 . thus @xmath490 and we have convergence by the direct comparison test . therefore , we can apply theorem [ theorem : feller ] and get that for any pair @xmath485 , @xmath486 , we can find an @xmath9 such that @xmath491 for all @xmath488 . by ( [ eqn : cond3a ] ) we have that @xmath492 . thus , we can clearly see that @xmath493 furthermore , since we keep the function @xmath153 constant as we increase the number of nodes in the network we get that @xmath494 converges to a constant @xmath495 given by @xmath496 the above expression comes from the fact that since each @xmath497 is a function of @xmath51 , @xmath494 will converge to the average of the @xmath498 over @xmath153 , the function that characterizes the set of @xmath51 s . therefore , given any @xmath140 , we can find an @xmath499 such that @xmath500 for all @xmath501 . note that since @xmath502 , we have that @xmath503 . since @xmath504 using ( [ eqn : slln ] ) and ( [ eq : means - converge ] ) we have @xmath505 for all @xmath488 , where @xmath506 . thus , we have @xmath507 almost surely . this completes the proof of lemma [ lemma : polarity_positive ] . @xmath210 * proof of lemma [ lemma : continuity1 ] . * first , we start by finding an analytical expression for @xmath508 . from the proof of lemma [ lemma : polarity_positive ] we have that @xmath509 therefore , @xmath508 can be written as @xmath510 f_{t}(\psi , s ) f_{\alpha}(s)d\psi ds| \\ & \leq & a_{max } \int_{\alpha_{low}}^{\alpha_{up}}\int_{-\infty}^{\infty } |p(t-\tau_{o}-\psi)-p(t_{o}-\tau_{o}-\psi)|f_{t}(\psi , s ) f_{\alpha}(s)d\psi ds \\ & = & a_{max } \int_{\alpha_{low}}^{\alpha_{up}}\int_{-\tau_{nz}+t_{o}-\tau_{0}-|t - t_{o}|}^{\tau_{nz}+t_{o}-\tau_{0}+|t - t_{o}| } f_{t}(\psi , s)f_{\alpha}(s ) d\psi ds,\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath511 . the change in the limits of integration in the last equality comes from the fact that @xmath512 outside of @xmath513 $ ] . this is the maximum interval over which @xmath514 can be non - zero . there is no need to take the absolute value of @xmath222 and @xmath153 since they are always non - negative . our second step is to bound the inner integral . before doing so , we first show that the inside integral is in fact riemann integrable . for any given @xmath78 and @xmath515 , the inside integral is taken over a closed interval . over a closed interval , we know from strichartz @xcite that any bounded function that is continuous except at a finite number of points is riemann integrable . furthermore , also from @xcite we know that the sums and products of continuous functions are continuous . as well , if a function is continuous then the absolute value of that function is also continuous . @xmath28 has at most @xmath516 locations at which it is discontinuous and over any open interval not containing a discontinuity , @xmath28 is uniformly continuous since @xmath181 is uniformly continuous . @xmath222 has @xmath517 discontinuities in @xmath267 for an given @xmath220 since it is gaussian for any @xmath220 . and since @xmath518 $ ] , @xmath519 for all @xmath267 and @xmath220 ( @xmath520 occurring when @xmath521 and @xmath522 ) . thus , since @xmath28 and @xmath222 are continuous except at a finite number of points , we see that for given @xmath220 , @xmath78 , and @xmath162 @xmath523 is also continuous in @xmath267 except at a finite number of points ( at most @xmath524 points ) . this function is also bounded since the product of two bounded functions is bounded . as a result , we see that the integral is riemann integrable over any closed interval . we now proceed to bound from above the value of this integral by first bounding the maximum value of the integral assuming no discontinuities and then introducing another term that bounds the maximum area contributed by the discontinuities . if we ignore the discontinuities and assume @xmath28 is uniformly continuous , for any @xmath525 there exists a @xmath526 such that @xmath527 for all @xmath78 and @xmath515 . as a result , @xmath514 can be made as small as desired by choosing the proper @xmath120 thus giving us @xmath528 for all @xmath267 for an appropriate choice of @xmath120 . furthermore , we note that @xmath529 because @xmath253 and @xmath519 . the maximum possible jump at a discontinuity in the function @xmath530 is thus @xmath531 and for any @xmath532 , the maximum area contributed by each discontinuity is @xmath533 . as a result , for all @xmath524 discontinuities , the maximum area contribution will be no more than @xmath534 . for the third term we want @xmath546 this gives us @xmath547 since the only requirement is @xmath536 for @xmath120 chosen by any given @xmath525 , we can always choose @xmath532 as small as desired . thus , this condition can be satisfied . with the second term we want the condition @xmath548 which means that @xmath549 again , this condition can be satisfied since we can choose @xmath550 as large as we want and @xmath532 as small as we want as long as @xmath536 for a given @xmath550 . thus , for any @xmath542 , we first choose @xmath551 . then , we find an @xmath552 such that @xmath553 implies that @xmath554 for all @xmath78 and @xmath515 if we remove the discontinuities in @xmath28 . then , if necessary , @xmath555 is increased to @xmath120 so that @xmath536 implies that @xmath556 and @xmath557 . if no increase is necessary , then @xmath558 . with this choice of @xmath526 , @xmath559 . as a result , for any @xmath271 , we can find an @xmath120 such that @xmath536 implies that @xmath560 . thus , @xmath206 is continuous . * proof of theorem [ theorem : main - delay ] . * let us start by writing ( [ eq : timesync - aggwaveform - withdelayandfix ] ) as @xmath561 where @xmath562 . recall that the dependence on @xmath220 comes from the fact that the density of @xmath33 is a function of @xmath51 which is characterized by @xmath153 . this notation is analogous to the notation used in section [ sec : pulseproperties ] . following the steps in the proof of lemma [ lemma : polarity_positive ] , we can quickly show that the limiting aggregate waveform at node @xmath29 will take on the form @xmath563 where @xmath564 with @xmath565 . therefore , we can prove theorem [ theorem : main - delay ] in two steps : * to show that @xmath266 is odd about @xmath32 , we need to show that @xmath566 is odd in @xmath78 about @xmath32 , i.e. @xmath567 for @xmath568 . * to show a zero - crossing at @xmath32 , show that @xmath569 . we first show that @xmath567 for @xmath208 . using the fact that @xmath570 and @xmath571 , we have the following : @xmath572)\big ) \\ & \stackrel{\small{(a)}}{= } & -e\big(a_{max}g(-d_{fix } ) g(d_{j , i } ) p(-\xi+[t_{i}+d_{fix}+d_{j , i}])\big ) \\ & = & -a_{max}\int_{-\infty}^{\infty } \int_{-\infty}^{0 } \int_{0}^{\infty}g(-y)g(x)p(-\xi+[\psi+y+x])f_{d_{j}}(x ) f_{d_{fix}}(y ) f_{t}(\psi , s)dx dy d\psi \\ & \stackrel{\small{(b)}}{= } & a_{max}\int_{\infty}^{-\infty } \int_{\infty}^{0 } \int_{0}^{-\infty}g(z)g(-u)p(-\xi-[w+z+u])f_{d_{j}}(-u ) f_{d_{fix}}(-z ) f_{t}(-w , s)du dz dw \\ & \stackrel{\small{(c)}}{= } & -a_{max}\int_{-\infty}^{\infty } \int_{-\infty}^{0 } \int_{0}^{\infty}g(-u)g(z)p(-\xi-[w+u+z])f_{d_{j}}(z ) f_{d_{fix}}(u ) f_{t}(w , s)dz du dw \\ & = & -e\big(a_{max}g(-d_{fix } ) g(d_{j , i } ) p(-\xi-[t_{i}+d_{fix}+d_{j , i}])\big ) \\ & = & -e(\tilde{m}_{i}(\tau_{0}-\xi , s)),\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath573 follows because @xmath574 and at @xmath575 we did a change of variables with @xmath576 , @xmath577 , and @xmath578 . @xmath579 follows from @xmath580 and @xmath581 . we thus have @xmath567 for @xmath568 . an - swol hu was born in new york state and grew up in california . he received his b.s . in electrical engineering from stanford university in 2002 . currently he is a ph.d . candidate in the school of electrical and computer engineering at cornell university . his research interests include applied statistics and statistical signal processing , with applications to sensor networks . sergio d. servetto was born in argentina , on january 18 , 1968 . he received a licenciatura en informatica from universidad nacional de la plata ( unlp , argentina ) in 1992 , and the m.sc . degree in electrical engineering and the ph.d . degree in computer science from the university of illinois at urbana - champaign ( uiuc ) , in 1996 and 1999 . between 1999 and 2001 , he worked at the ecole polytechnique federale de lausanne ( epfl ) , lausanne , switzerland . since fall 2001 , he has been an assistant professor in the school of electrical and computer engineering at cornell university , and a member of the field of applied mathematics . he was the recipient of the 1998 ray ozzie fellowship , given to `` outstanding graduate students in computer science , '' and of the 1999 david j. kuck outstanding thesis award , for the best doctoral dissertation of the year , both from the dept . of computer science at uiuc . he is also the recipient of a 2003 nsf career award . his research interests are centered around information theoretic aspects of networked systems , with a current emphasis on problems that arise in the context of large - scale sensor networks . Abstract:

Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.

Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered . Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video . Paper: magnetic fields are ubiquitous in diverse astrophysical settings on various scales ranging from proto - stellar discs , young stellar objects ( ysos ) , microquasars , quasars , galaxies and grandiose astrophysical jets to clusters of galaxies . in some cases , magnetic fields are relatively weak so that dynamical processes are almost unaffected by their presence . however , there do exist numerous cases where magnetic fields are necessary and important for both dynamics and diagnostics , especially in spiral galaxies and accretion disc systems ( e.g. , sofue et al . 1986 ; beck et al . 1996 ; balbus & hawley 1998 ; tagger & pellat 1999 ; widrow 2002 ) . in general , it is challenging to model magnetic fields realistically because of their complexities ( sofue et al . 1986 ; kronberg 1994 ; caunt & tagger 2001 ; widrow 2002 ) . in the problems involving protostar formation and disc galaxies , shu & li ( 1997 ) presumed the so - called ` isopedic ' magnetic field configuration where the mass - to - magnetic flux ratio in a razor thin disc remains constant . using a singular isothermal disc ( sid ) model ( mestel 1963 ) that is isopedically magnetized , shu et al . ( 2000 ) studied stationary coplanar perturbations and proposed that these global modes are bifurcations to either secularly or dynamically unstable configurations . along a separate yet complementary line , lou ( 2002 ) studied an azimuthally magnetized singular isothermal disc ( msid ) and derived two different global stationary magnetohydrodynamic ( mhd ) perturbation modes . based on the msid model , lou ( 2002 ) explored the manifestation of interlaced optical and magnetic field spiral arms in the outer portion of a disc with a nearly flat rotation curve such as the case of the nearby spiral galaxy ngc 6946 ( beck & hoernes 1996 ; fan & lou 1996 ; lou & fan 1998a , 2002 ; frick et al . 2000 , 2001 ; lou et al . 2002 ) . in contexts of spiral galaxies , it is natural and important to consider a composite disc system consisting of gravitationally coupled gaseous and stellar discs . this is because various physical processes on different scales occur in the gaseous disc yet large - scale gas dynamics and environment are significantly affected by large - scale structures in the stellar disc ( lou & fan 1998b ) . to construct global coplanar perturbation structures in a systematic manner , we started with a composite sid system of two fluid discs without magnetic field ( lou & shen 2003 ) to generalize the work of shu et al . ( 2000 ) for a single sid . in terms of the global axisymmetric stability for such a composite sid system , we provided a more straightforward @xmath12criterion ( shen & lou 2003 ) in contrast to the axisymmetric stability criteria of elmegreen ( 1995 ) and jog ( 1996 ) . to be more general than a background sid profile , we recently constructed global stationary perturbation patterns in a composite system of two fluid scale - free discs without magnetic field ( shen & lou 2004a , b ) to further generalize the work of syer & tremaine ( 1996 ) . with proper adaptations , these global stationary perturbation solutions may be utilized to model large - scale structures spiral galaxies . while a scale - free disc has no characteristic scales , one may impose boundary conditions to describe a modified scale - free disc , e.g. , by cutting a central hole in a disc ( e.g. , zang 1976 ; evans & read 1998a , b ) . with such boundary conditions , discrete eigenfunctions for perturbations may be constructed as growing normal modes . on the other hand , by specifying a phase relation for a postulated reflection of spiral waves from the origin @xmath13 , goodman & evans ( 1999 ) could also define discrete normal modes even for an unmodified gaseous sid . shu et al . ( 2000 ) speculated that the swing amplification process ( e.g. , goldreich & lynden - bell 1965 ; julian & toomre 1966 ; toomre 1977 ; fan & lou 1997 ) across corotation allows a continuum of normal modes ( lynden - bell & lemos 1993 ) while proper ` boundary conditions ' may select from this continuum a discrete spectrum of unstable normal modes ; they also suggested that zero - frequency ( stationary ) disturbances do signal the onset of instability . on the basis of the work of shu et al . ( 2000 ) for a single isopedically magnetized sid and of lou & shen ( 2003 ) for a composite sid system without magnetic field , lou & wu ( 2004 ) analyzed coplanar mhd perturbation structures in a composite sid system with one of the disc being isopedically magnetized ( shu & li 1997 ) . as x - ray emitting hot gases can freely flow along open magnetic field lines anchored at the gaseous disc , global stationary solutions constructed by lou & wu ( 2004 ) set an important preliminary stage for modelling spiral galactic mhd winds . in particular , if activities of star formation , starbursts and supernovae etc . are mainly responsible for producing x - ray emitting hot gases streaming out of the galactic plane from both sides , we would expect stronger winds from the circumnuclear starburst region ( e.g. lou et al . 2001 ) and along spiral arms than those winds from the remainder of the galactic disc plane . both sid and msid models offer valuable physical insight for disc dynamics and belong to a wider family of scale - free discs ( syer & tremaine 1996 ) where physical variables in the axisymmetric background equilibrium scale as powers of radius @xmath14 ( e.g. , the rotation curve @xmath15 ) . it turns out that coplanar perturbations in such scale - free discs in a proper range of @xmath8 can be treated globally and analytically ( lemos et al . 1991 ; syer & tremaine 1996 ) without invoking the usual wkbj or tight - winding approximation to solve the poisson equation for density wave perturbations ( lin & shu 1964 ; binney & tremaine 1987 ; bertin & lin 1996 ) . in other words , it becomes feasible to include azimuthal magnetic fields in a scale - free disc and to construct global coplanar mhd perturbation configurations that are stationary in an inertial frame of reference . such analytical solutions , still idealized and limited , are making important further steps and are extremely valuable for bench - marking numerical codes and for initializing numerical mhd simulations . for an azimuthally magnetized scale - free disc with an infinitesimal thickness , the axisymmetric background equilibrium without radial flow is characterized by following features : a surface mass density @xmath0 , a rotation curve @xmath2 , an azimuthal magnetic field @xmath1 and a barotropic equation of state @xmath16 where @xmath5 is the vertically integrated gas pressure with constant @xmath17 for a warm disc and @xmath18 as the barotropic index . to maintain a radial force balance at all radii , there exists an explicit relationship among @xmath7 , @xmath8 , @xmath9 and @xmath6 such that only one parameter is independent . as will be seen in section 2 , it is convenient to use @xmath8 as this independent parameter ( syer & tremaine 1996 ; shen & lou 2004b ) . in order to satisfy relevant constraints , the prescribed range of @xmath8 turns out to be @xmath10 that includes the previous special case of @xmath19 ( i.e. , the msid case ) studied by lou ( 2002 ) , lou & zou ( 2004a ) and lou & wu ( 2004 ) . in section 2 , we introduce coplanar mhd perturbations and present the linearized perturbation equations . we construct and analyze global stationary aligned and logarithmic spiral perturbation configurations in section 3 and as an example of illustration , we discuss specifically the case of @xmath11 with the background azimuthal magnetic field being force - free . in section 4 , we derive phase relationships between perturbation enhancements of surface mass density and magnetic field for both aligned and logarithmic spiral cases , and discuss the problem of angular momentum conservation . finally , we summarize our results in section 5 . for the convenience of reference , relevant technical details are collected in the appendices . in the magnetofluid approximation , the disc is taken to be razor - thin ( i.e. , we use vertically integrated magnetofluid equations and neglect vertical derivatives of physical variables ) and large - scale stationary aligned and spiral coplanar disturbances develop in a background mhd rotational equilibrium of axisymmetry ( syer & tremaine 1996 ; lou 2002 ; lou & zou 2004a ; lou & wu 2004 ) . the background magnetic field is taken to be azimuthal to avoid the magnetic field winding dilemma ( lou & fan 1998a ) . for the sake of simplicity at this stage , non - ideal effects such as viscosity , resistivity and thermal diffusion etc . are ignored for large - scale perturbations . using cylindrical coordinates @xmath20 , we have the following two - dimensional nonlinear mhd equations for a razor - thin disc geometry : the mass conservation equation @xmath21 where @xmath22 is the surface mass density , @xmath23 is the radial bulk flow velocity , @xmath24 is the specific angular momentum in the vertical @xmath25-direction and @xmath26 is the azimuthal linear velocity ; the radial component of the momentum equation @xmath27\ , \end{split}\ ] ] where @xmath5 is the vertically integrated gas pressure ( sometimes referred to as two - dimensional pressure ) , @xmath28 is the total gravitational potential including that of an axisymmetric dark matter halo in contexts of disc galaxies , and @xmath29 and @xmath30 are the azimuthal and radial components of the coplanar magnetic field @xmath31 , respectively ; the azimuthal component of the momentum equation @xmath32\ ; \end{split}\ ] ] the poisson integral equation @xmath33^{1/2}}\ , \ ] ] where @xmath34 is defined as the ratio of the potential arising from the disc to that arising from the entire system including a massive dark matter halo that is presumed not to respond to coplanar perturbations in the disc plane ( syer & tremaine 1996 ; shu & li 1997 ; shu et al . 2000 ; lou & shen 2003 ; shen & lou 2004a , b ; lou & zou 2004a ) with @xmath35 for a full disc and @xmath36 for partial discs ; the divergence - free condition of magnetic field @xmath37 @xmath38 the radial component of the magnetic induction equation @xmath39 the azimuthal component of the magnetic field induction equation @xmath40 and the barotropic equation of state @xmath41 where constants @xmath17 and @xmath18 . among the three equations ( [ divergfree ] ) , ( [ radiaminduct ] ) and ( [ azimuminduct ] ) , we can freely choose two independent ones . by barotropic equation of state ( [ barotropic ] ) , the sound speed @xmath42 is defined by @xmath43 where subscript @xmath44 indicates the background equilibrium . an isothermal sound speed corresponds to a barotropic index @xmath45 . we now proceed to derive properties of an axisymmetric rotational mhd equilibrium characterized by physical variables associated with a subscript @xmath44 . in our notations , such a background equilibrium has the following power - law scalings : surface mass density of @xmath0 , a radial velocity profile @xmath46 and @xmath47 , a purely azimuthal magnetic field with @xmath48 and @xmath49 . substitutions of these power - law scalings into equations @xmath50 lead to the following condition for the radial force balance , namely @xmath51 where the alfvn speed @xmath52 in a thin disc is defined by @xmath53 and the poisson integral gives @xmath54 with the numerical factor @xmath55 explicitly defined by @xmath56 and @xmath57 being the standard gamma function . this expression ( [ p0 ] ) can also be included in a more general form of @xmath58 as in expression ( [ pm ] ) derived later with the limiting result of @xmath59 as @xmath60 . to satisfy the radial force balance equation ( [ sfeqn ] ) at all radii ( i.e. , scale - free ) would necessarily require ) in general and for the special case of @xmath11 , we have @xmath61 for the equilibrium magnetic field to be force - free ( e.g. , low & lou 1990 ) . the non - force - free msid case studied by lou ( 2002 ) has @xmath62 , @xmath19 , @xmath63 and @xmath45 . ] @xmath64 which immediately leads to the explicit expressions of indices @xmath7 , @xmath9 and @xmath6 all in terms of @xmath8 @xmath65 in this formulation , @xmath66 remains finite only if @xmath67 which implies @xmath68 . for the total gravity force arising from the equilibrium surface mass densities to be finite , a larger @xmath69range @xmath70 is allowed . the @xmath69range is also constrained by @xmath10 where the first inequality is required for @xmath18 and the second inequality is imposed such that the central point mass will not diverge . by these considerations , the plausible range of @xmath8 falls in @xmath71 ( see syer & tremaine 1996 and shen & lou 2004a , b ) . according to equations ( [ sfeqn ] ) and ( [ pararelation ] ) , we can explicitly write all physical variables of the background equilibrium state in power - law scalings of @xmath14 in terms of parameter @xmath8 , namely @xmath72 } { 2\pi g(2\beta{\cal p}_0)r^{1 + 2\beta}}\ , \ \ \qquad a^2=\frac{a^2}{(1 + 2\beta)r^{2\beta}}\ , \ \ \qquad c_a^2\equiv q^2a^2=\frac{q^2a^2}{(1 + 2\beta)r^{2\beta}}\ , \\ & v_0=\frac{ad}{r^{\beta}}\ , \ \ \qquad j_0\equiv rv_0=\frac{ad}{r^{\beta-1}}\ , \ \ \qquad \omega\equiv\frac{j_0}{r^2}=\frac{ad}{r^{1+\beta}}\ , \ \ \qquad\kappa\equiv [ ( 2\omega / r)d(r^2\omega)/dr]^{1/2}=[2(1-\beta)]^{1/2}\omega\ . \end{split}\ ] ] by introducing a reference radius @xmath73 , the constant @xmath74 is actually related to a scaled sound speed @xmath75 , the constant @xmath76 $ ] is a scaled rotational mach number , the constant @xmath77 is the ratio of the alfvn speed @xmath52 to the sound speed @xmath42 , @xmath78 and @xmath79 are the equilibrium angular speed and the epicyclic frequency , respectively ( lou 2002 ; shen & lou 2004a , b ) . the first expression of equation ( [ propequilib ] ) puts an upper limit on the magnetic field strength , namely , @xmath80 . alternatively , once a magnetic field parameter @xmath81 is chosen , the scaled rotational mach number @xmath82 must meet the following physical requirement @xmath83 for a positive equilibrium surface mass density @xmath84 . note that for @xmath85 , inequality ( [ restrt ] ) is automatically satisfied without actually restricting @xmath81 and the relevant physical requirement is simply @xmath86 . not all stationary solutions of @xmath87 can satisfy condition ( [ restrt ] ) . this then implies limits on allowed magnetic field strength for a known background rotational mhd equilibrium . it is also important to note that for the axisymmetric background rotational mhd equilibrium under consideration , the magnetic force arising from the azimuthal magnetic field is radially inward when @xmath88 , radially outward when @xmath89 and is zero when @xmath11 [ i.e. , the azimuthal magnetic field is force - free ( lou & fan 1998a ) and the equilibrium density distribution reduces to that of the single unmagnetized disc case ( lemos et al . 1991 ; syer & tremaine 1996 ) ] . these different possibilities can be physically understood in terms of the competition between the magnetic pressure and tension forces . in order to see this more specifically for the background , we can write @xmath90 $ ] referring to equation ( [ radialmomeneqn ] ) . the first term in the square brackets stands for the magnetic pressure force and the second term stands for the magnetic tension force for a purely azimuthal magnetic field @xmath91 in the cylindrical geometry . as @xmath92 scales @xmath93 , we have @xmath94 . therefore for @xmath95 or equivalently @xmath88 , the magnetic tension force dominates and the total magnetic force is radially inward ; for @xmath96 or equivalently @xmath89 , the magnetic pressure force dominates and the total magnetic force is radially outward . the two magnetic forces balance each other for @xmath61 ( or @xmath11 ) . on the basis of the full mhd equations @xmath97 , we readily derive the linearized coplanar mhd perturbation equations as @xmath98 @xmath99 -\frac{1}{\sigma_0}\int\frac{dzb_{\theta}}{4\pi r } \frac{\partial(rb_0)}{\partial r}\ , \end{split}\ ] ] @xmath100 @xmath101^{1/2}},\ ] ] @xmath102 @xmath103 @xmath104 where we use subscript @xmath105 to denote associations with small disturbances in physical variables and @xmath106 stands for the coplanar magnetic field perturbation . as the background rotational mhd equilibrium is stationary and axisymmetric , these perturbed physical variables can be decomposed in terms of fourier harmonics with the periodic dependence @xmath107 where @xmath108 is the angular frequency and @xmath109 is an integer for azimuthal variations . more specifically , we write @xmath110 where @xmath111 , @xmath112 , @xmath113 , @xmath114 , @xmath115 and @xmath116 are all radial variations of the corresponding perturbed physical variables and can be complex in general for possible radial oscillations . without loss of generality , we take @xmath117 in our analysis . with fourier decomposition ( [ fourier ] ) , it is then straightforward to cast coplanar mhd perturbation equations @xmath118 into the following forms of @xmath119 @xmath120\ , \end{split}\ ] ] where @xmath121 is a short - hand notation , and @xmath122 @xmath123 @xmath124 @xmath125 @xmath126 where equation ( [ perturb07 ] ) can be derived by combining equations ( [ perturb05 ] ) and ( [ perturb06 ] ) . we now rearrange the time - dependent coplanar mhd perturbation equations by taking @xmath127 from equations ( [ perturb01])@xmath128([perturb07 ] ) ; and the special case of @xmath129 will be analyzed in details at the end of this subsection . from equations ( [ perturb05 ] ) and ( [ perturb06 ] ) , we readily obtain @xmath130 a substitution of equation ( [ zr ] ) into the radial and azimuthal components of the momentum equation ( [ perturb02 ] ) and ( [ perturb03 ] ) yields @xmath131 \bigg(\frac{u}{\omega - m\omega}\bigg)\ , \end{split}\ ] ] and @xmath132 respectively . in order to construct global solutions without the wkbj approximation , we are mainly interested in stationary configurations with zero pattern speed @xmath133 , also referred to as neutral @xmath134 modes ( e.g. , syer & tremaine 1996 ; shu et al . 2000 ; lou 2002 ; shen & lou 2004a , b ; lou & zou 2004a ) . by setting @xmath134 and taking @xmath127 , equations ( [ perturb01 ] ) , ( [ zr ] ) , ( [ radial ] ) and ( [ azimuthal ] ) can be readily reduced to @xmath135 @xmath136 @xmath137\frac{\hbox{i}u}{\omega}\ , \end{split}\ ] ] @xmath138 equations ( [ stationary1 ] ) through ( [ stationary4 ] ) together with equation ( [ perturb04 ] ) are the basic mhd perturbation equations for constructing stationary non - axisymmetric @xmath127 configurations of both aligned and unaligned logarithmic spiral cases . note that aligned and spiral stationary global solutions both involve propagations of fast and slow mhd density waves ( lou 2002 ) . we next present the basic coplanar mhd perturbation equations for stationary axisymmetric @xmath129 configurations with or without radial propagations . starting from equations ( [ perturb01 ] ) , ( [ perturb06 ] ) , ( [ perturb07 ] ) , ( [ radial ] ) and ( [ azimuthal ] ) by setting @xmath129 and @xmath139 , we obtain @xmath140\hbox{i}u\ , \\ & \omega j=\frac{r\kappa^2}{2\omega}\hbox{i}u\ , \\ & r=0\ , \qquad\qquad \omega z=\frac{\partial}{\partial r}(b_0\hbox{i}u)\ . \end{split}\ ] ] this set of equations is applicable as we proceed to investigate stationary axisymmetric coplanar mhd perturbations ( lou & zou 2004a , b ) . for coplanar hydrodynamic perturbations or coplanar mhd perturbations in an isopedically magnetized sid ( shu et al . 2000 ) , there is no essential difference for changing the order of limiting procedure for @xmath129 and @xmath141 . however , for msid with a coplanar azimuthal background magnetic field , the results would be different by changing the order of limiting procedure for @xmath129 and @xmath141 ( lou 2002 ; lou & fan 2002 ; lou & zou 2004a ) . to solve the poisson equation connecting the perturbed surface mass density and the perturbed gravitational potential , we may consistently assume disturbances to carry proper scale - free forms ( lynden - bell & lemos 1993 ) for aligned and logarithmic spiral perturbations . for aligned perturbations , @xmath111 contains only an amplitude variation in @xmath14 of perturbed surface mass density and does not involve phase variation in @xmath14 so that the maximum density perturbations at different radii line up in the azimuth . for spiral perturbations in comparison , in addition to an amplitude variation in @xmath14 , @xmath111 also involves a phase variation in @xmath14 such that a spiral pattern emerges . for aligned global coplanar mhd perturbations , we select those perturbations that carry the same power - law variation in @xmath14 of the background equilibrium , namely @xmath142 where @xmath143 is a small constant coefficient and the numerical factor @xmath58 is given explicitly by @xmath144 where @xmath145 ( qian 1992 ; syer & tremaine 1996 ; shen & lou 2004a , b ) . in the limit of @xmath60 , we simply have @xmath146 consistent with earlier results on sids and msids ( shu et al . 2000 ; lou 2002 ; lou & shen 2003 ; lou & zou 2004a ; lou & wu 2004 ) . in fact , a more general class of self - consistent potential - density pairs satisfying the poisson integral ( [ perturb04 ] ) is also available ; see footnote 3 in shen & lou ( 2004b ) . for aligned neutral modes of axisymmetry ( @xmath129 ) , we can start from equation ( [ m0 ] ) by setting @xmath134 ; this implies @xmath147 and gives no constraints on @xmath148 . as @xmath149 , the scale - free condition requires @xmath150 with @xmath151 and @xmath152 . it turns out that such stationary coplanar mhd perturbations are simply alternative states for the axisymmetric background equilibrium with a proper rescaling factor ( shu et al . 2000 ; lou 2002 ) . as this is somewhat trivial , we now turn our attention mainly to cases of non - axisymmetric @xmath127 stationary aligned coplanar mhd perturbations . for the potential - density pair @xmath149 and @xmath153 , we have @xmath154 and @xmath152 according to equations @xmath155 . it then follows that @xmath156}{2m\omega r^2}\hbox{i}u\ , \\ & m\omega j+r(1-\beta)\omega \hbox{i}u=\frac{ma^2}{r\sigma_0}\bigg(\frac{r\sigma_0}{a^2}2\pi g { \cal p}_m-1\bigg)rs+\frac{c_a^2(1 - 4\beta)}{2\omega r}\hbox{i}u\ , \\ & z=-\bigg(\frac{1}{2}-2\beta\bigg)\frac{b_0\hbox{i}u}{m\omega r}\ , \qquad\qquad\qquad r=\frac{b_0u}{\omega r}\ . \end{split}\ ] ] rearranging the first three equations of ( [ alignedmge1 ] ) , we obtain a set of three algebraic equations , namely @xmath157 where coefficients @xmath158 , @xmath159 , @xmath160 ( @xmath161 ) are explicitly defined by @xmath162\ , \quad\qquad b_2\equiv m\omega+\frac{[(1 - 4\beta)^2 - 2m^2]c_a^2}{2m\omega r^2}\ , \quad\qquad c_2\equiv\frac{2\omega}{r}\ , \\ & a_3\equiv -mr\bigg[2\pi g{\cal p}_m(\beta ) -\frac{a^2}{\sigma_0 r}\bigg]\ , \qquad\qquad b_3\equiv r(1-\beta)\omega-\frac{(1 - 4\beta)c_a^2}{2\omega r}\ , \qquad\qquad c_3\equiv m\omega\ . \end{split}\ ] ] for nontrivial solutions of @xmath163 , the determinant of algebraic equations ( [ suj ] ) must vanish , namely @xmath164 using coefficient definitions ( [ abc ] ) in condition ( [ aligned0 ] ) , we obtain a more informative form of stationary dispersion relation @xmath165}{[m^2\omega^2r^2 -c_a^2(m^2 - 1/2 - 8\beta^2 + 4\beta ) ] [ ( 1 + 2\beta)\omega^2r^2-c_a^2(1/2 - 2\beta)]}\ \\ & \qquad\qquad\qquad -\frac{4\beta a^2 - 8\beta\pi g{\cal p}_m\sigma_0r + ( 1 - 4\beta)c_a^2}{2[m^2\omega^2r^2 -c_a^2(m^2 - 1/2 - 8\beta^2 + 4\beta)]}\ . \end{split}\ ] ] note that equation ( [ aligned1 ] ) takes a simpler form in the limit of @xmath60 ( i.e. , a flat rotation curve of a sid ) and reduces to equation ( 3.1.9 ) of lou ( 2002 ) as expected . by using background mhd equilibrium variables ( [ propequilib ] ) in condition ( [ aligned1 ] ) , we obtain the stationary dispersion relation for global aligned @xmath127 coplanar mhd configurations in the form of a quadratic equation in terms of @xmath166 , namely @xmath167 where the three coefficients @xmath168 ( @xmath161 ) are defined by @xmath169q^2 -{\cal a}_m(1-f { \cal c}{\cal p}_m)\ , \\ & c_0\equiv -\frac{1 - 4\beta}{4(1 + 2\beta ) } \bigg[\frac{-2m^2+(1 - 4\beta)(1 - 2\beta)}{1 + 2\beta } f{\cal c}{\cal p}_m+1 - 4\beta\bigg]q^4 -\frac{-2m^2+(1 - 4\beta)(1 - 2\beta)}{2(1 + 2\beta ) } ( 1-f{\cal c}{\cal p}_m)q^2\ , \end{split}\ ] ] with auxiliary parameters explicitly defined by @xmath170\ . \end{split}\ ] ] which are exactly the same as those defined in shen & lou ( 2004b ) for aligned cases of global perturbations in a purely hydrodynamic composite disc system . here , the effect of coplanar magnetic field is associated with the @xmath81 parameter in definitions ( [ alignc2c1c0 ] ) . the determinant of quadratic equation ( [ aligned ] ) , @xmath171 , depends on various parameters and can become negative under some circumstances ( i.e. , no physical solutions for @xmath166 ) . for @xmath172 , the two real solutions of @xmath166 to equation ( [ aligned ] ) are @xmath173 as a first check of necessary consistency , we consider the limiting case of vanishing magnetic field , that is , @xmath174 . then , equation ( [ aligned ] ) simply reduces to @xmath175 which gives a non - trivial solution @xmath176 this @xmath87 solution ( [ alignednomsol ] ) is exactly the same result for the case of a single scale - free gas disc without magnetic field ( see syer & tremaine 1996 and subsection 3.1 of shen & lou 2004b ) . as a second check of necessary consistency , we consider another limiting case of @xmath60 which corresponds to the msid case with a flat rotation curve studied by lou ( 2002 ) . one can readily show that equation ( [ aligned ] ) reduces to equation ( 3.2.11 ) of lou ( 2002 ) as expected . in contrast to the case of a single fluid disc studied by syer & tremaine ( 1996 ) without azimuthal magnetic fields , there are now two branches of @xmath87 solutions of algebraic equation ( [ aligned ] ) in general . a @xmath87 solution is considered to be physical when it satisfies both the condition @xmath86 and inequality ( [ restrt ] ) . when the magnetic field becomes sufficiently weak , among these two branches of @xmath87 solutions , @xmath177 is the counterpart of the single disc case and @xmath178 is additional due to the coupling between the surface mass density and magnetic field . we recall that in a composite system of one stellar disc and one gaseous disc coupled through the mutual gravitational interaction , there are also two branches of @xmath87 solutions ( lou & fan 1998b , 2000 ; lou & shen 2003 ; shen & lou 2004b ) . in a composite stellar - gaseous disc system , the two different classes of perturbation modes correspond to either in - phase or out - of - phase of surface mass density perturbation enhancements ( see also lou & wu 2004 ) . in a single azimuthally magnetized disc , the two coplanar mhd modes @xmath177 and @xmath178 will be distinguished by either in - phase or out - of - phase perturbation enhancements of the surface mass density and the azimuthal magnetic field in the wkbj or tight - winding approximation . in the wkbj regime , the @xmath177 and @xmath178 branches correspond to stationary fast and slow mhd density waves , respectively ( fan & lou 1996 ; lou & fan 1998a ) . although the phase relationships for perturbation enhancements of the surface mass density and the azimuthal magnetic field become @xmath179 for open spiral structures ( lou 2002 ; lou & fan 2002 ) , we shall still refer to @xmath177 and @xmath178 solutions as global stationary fast and slow mhd density waves , respectively . we shall come back to this discussion of ` phase relationship ' in more details in section 4 . as an example of illustration , we now focus on the specific case of @xmath11 with inequality ( [ restrt ] ) automatically satisfied . in such a magnetized disc system , the rotation curve scales as @xmath180 , the surface mass density scales as @xmath181 , the barotropic index is @xmath182 and the azimuthal magnetic field scales as @xmath183 ( i.e. , the background equilibrium magnetic field is force - free ) . for this specific case , the determinant @xmath184 of algebraic equation ( [ aligned ] ) remains always positive for both full and partial discs ( see proofs in appendix a ) . as seen from @xmath87 solutions ( [ solalign ] ) , the sign of @xmath185 determines whether @xmath177/@xmath178 is the upper / lower branch or reverse . for @xmath186 , we always have @xmath187 and therefore @xmath177 and @xmath178 remain to be the higher and lower branches , respectively . the situation becomes somewhat involved for the @xmath188 case when the sign of @xmath185 is dependent on the value of @xmath189 parameter . we show in fig . 1 the @xmath166 solution branches for @xmath188 and @xmath190 cases , respectively , versus the gravitational potential ratio @xmath189 . for the @xmath188 case , there exists a diverging point at @xmath191 $ ] for @xmath192 solution branch where @xmath193 . the value of this critical @xmath194 is numerically determined to be @xmath195 . more specifically , we have @xmath196 for @xmath197 , while we have @xmath187 for @xmath198 . this sign variation of @xmath185 is indicated by the relative locations of @xmath177 and @xmath178 solution branches as shown in panel @xmath199 of fig . in other words , for @xmath200 , @xmath177 remains negative and the only physical solution is @xmath178 . on the other hand for @xmath198 , both @xmath177 and @xmath178 solution branches become physically plausible . for @xmath11 , the explicit form of algebraic equation ( [ aligned ] ) becomes @xmath201d^4 -\bigg[\bigg(\frac{2{f}{\cal c}{\cal p}_m}{3 } + 1\bigg)m^2q^2+\bigg(m^2+\frac{3}{4}\bigg)(1-{f } { \cal c}{\cal p}_m)\bigg]d^2+\frac{2}{3}(1-{f } { \cal c}{\cal p}_m)m^2q^2=0\ , \ ] ] where auxiliary parameters @xmath202 , @xmath203 , @xmath204 , @xmath205 and @xmath206 are all evaluated at @xmath11 . it is fairly straightforward to show that @xmath207 for all @xmath127 when @xmath11 ( shen & lou 2004b ) . as @xmath208 , we then have @xmath209 . in our formulation , stationary surface mass density perturbations are characterized by @xmath210 . for aligned coplanar mhd perturbations , we took @xmath211 where @xmath212 is a real exponent . in section 3.1 , we have chosen @xmath213 that carries the same power - law dependence as the equilibrium disc does . for a complex @xmath212 , a perturbation pattern would appear spiral , that is , a logarithmic spiral in the form of @xmath214 $ ] where @xmath215 and @xmath216 are real and imaginary parts of @xmath212 . to ensure the gravitational potential arising from this perturbed surface mass density being finite , we should require @xmath217 ( e.g. , qian 1992 ) . in fact , there exists a more general class of self - consistent potential - density pairs as indicated in footnote 7 of shen & lou ( 2004b ) . however , for the analysis of axisymmetric stability problem in section 3.2.1 , equation ( [ spirperturb ] ) is used such that dispersion relation ( [ m0u ] ) derived later on is real on both sides ( e.g. , lemos et al . 1991 ; syer & tremaine 1996 ; shu et al . 2000 ) . to be specific here , we consistently take the logarithmic spiral surface mass density perturbations and the resulting gravitational potentials as ( kalnajs 1971 ; lemos et al . 1991 ; shu et al . 2000 ; lou 2002 ; lou & shen 2003 ; shen & lou 2004b ; lou & zou 2004a ) @xmath218 where @xmath143 is a small constant , @xmath219 is a parameter related to the radial wavenumber and the kalnajs function @xmath220 is defined by @xmath221 ( kalnajs 1971 ) . as @xmath220 is an even function of @xmath219 , a consideration of @xmath222 would suffice . in our convention of notations , @xmath223 and @xmath224 correspond to leading and trailing logarithmic spiral waves , respectively , and @xmath225 relates the parameter @xmath219 to the radial wavenumber @xmath226 . we note that @xmath220 decreases monotonically with increasing @xmath223 , and @xmath227 for @xmath127 ; for @xmath129 , @xmath228 is positive and can be greater than 1 when @xmath219 becomes sufficiently small . the choice of unaligned perturbations is not unique , and the perturbation potential - density pairs may involve @xmath8 parameter such that the background plus coplanar mhd perturbations are altogether scale - free ( e.g. , syer & tremaine 1996 ) . as an example of illustration , we here presume coplanar logarithmic spiral perturbations defined by the density - potential pair ( [ spirperturb ] ) in the following analysis . for the specific @xmath11 case , the background surface mass density and the perturbed surface mass density bear the same radial scaling @xmath229 . we start from the axisymmetric coplanar mhd perturbation equation ( [ m0 ] ) with @xmath139 . for radial oscillations with a logarithmic potential - density pair , we presume a surface mass density @xmath230 , a gravitational potential @xmath231 and thus a radial speed @xmath232 according to the first of equation ( [ m0 ] ) . after proper rearrangements , the set of equations ( [ m0 ] ) can be combined to form a single equation in terms of @xmath112 , namely @xmath233u\\ & = \frac{a^2}{r^2}\bigg\{\bigg[1-{f}{\cal c } { \cal n}_0\bigg(1+d^2-\frac{1 - 4\beta}{2 + 4\beta}q^2\bigg)\bigg ] \bigg(\frac{1}{4}+\xi^2\bigg ) + q^2\bigg(\frac{1}{4}+\xi^2-\beta\bigg)\bigg\}u\ , \end{split}\ ] ] where @xmath234 , @xmath235 $ ] and @xmath236 is extremely small . by inspection , equation ( [ m0u ] ) bears similar features of the dispersion relation in the classic wkbj regime involving magnetic field . as the right - hand side of equation ( [ m0u ] ) is real , axisymmetric instabilities first set via neutral @xmath134 modes . it should be emphasized that the scale - free condition is met only for neutral modes . with @xmath237 , the marginal stability curves are then given by @xmath238\}(\xi^2 + 1/4)+q^2(\xi^2-\beta+1/4)}{{f } { \cal c}{\cal n}_0(\xi^2 + 1/4)+(1 + 2\beta)(-2 + 2\beta)}\ .\ ] ] as a check of necessary consistency , the axisymmetric marginal stability curve for an msid when @xmath19 ( @xmath239 ) then gives @xmath240 ( \xi^2 + 1/4)}{{f}{\cal n}_0(\xi^2 + 1/4)-2}\ .\ ] ] one can readily show ) is automatically satisfied for @xmath85 and we need only to examine the range of @xmath88 . when the denominator of the right - hand side of equation ( [ msc ] ) is negative , the numerator must also be negative for @xmath86 . it then follows that @xmath241 and inequality ( [ restrt ] ) is met . when the denominator of the right - hand side of equation ( [ msc ] ) is positive , it is easy to show that inequality ( [ restrt ] ) holds . as solution ( [ mscbeta0 ] ) is a special case of solution ( [ msc ] ) , inequality ( [ restrt ] ) is thus met . ] that stationary dispersion relations ( [ msc ] ) and ( [ mscbeta0 ] ) automatically satisfy inequality ( [ restrt ] ) for physical solutions @xmath86 . in the msid case with different values of @xmath77 parameter for magnetic field strengths , one readily obtains the marginal stability curves that separate two distinct unstable regimes , namely , the collapse regime for large radial spatial scales and the ring fragmentation regime for relatively short radial wavelengths ( lemos et al . 1991 ; shen & lou 2003 , 2004a ) . there exists a critical @xmath242 where @xmath87 diverges and this @xmath243 is determined by @xmath244 . for @xmath245 , we have @xmath246 and thus an enhancement of @xmath77 tends to suppress the collapse boundary . for @xmath247 , we have @xmath248 and thus an enhancement of @xmath77 tends to raise the ring fragmentation boundary . in short , an enhancement of ring magnetic field tends to reduce dangers of both collapse and ring fragmentation instabilities in the msid case . while the enhancement of ring magnetic field tends to suppress ring fragmentation instabilities in general , it only suppresses collapse instabilities for @xmath88 and tends to aggravate collapse instabilities for @xmath89 ( see fig . 2 for details ) . it has been shown that the magnetic force is radially inward and outward for @xmath88 and @xmath89 , respectively . why does the trend of variations for the collapse - stability appear seemingly paradoxical ? this situation can be understood because the unperturbed background is in an mhd radial force balance and the surface mass density , the rotation speed and the magnetic field are coupled explicitly through condition ( [ propequilib ] ) . furthermore , for fast mhd density waves with @xmath129 ( lou & fan 1998a ) , the gas pressure and magnetic pressure together is associated with the radial wavenumber squared , while the surface mass density and self - gravity are associated linearly with the radial wavenumber ( see the first line of dispersion relation [ m0u ] with small @xmath236 ) . for @xmath88 , the surface mass density becomes smaller for stronger magnetic field strength , while for @xmath89 , the situation reverses . for the ring fragmentation instability at relatively large radial wavenumbers , the dominant magnetic pressure effect tends to stabilize the disc . for the jeans collapse instability at relatively small radial wavenumbers , the dominant self - gravity effect is proportional to the background surface mass density ; the roles of magnetic field for two different situations can then be readily understood . it is the coupling effect between the surface mass density and the magnetic field of the background that gives rise to this collapse feature . the marginal stability curves for scale - free discs with @xmath249 and without magnetic fields are @xmath250 that are consistent with those for the single - disc case of shen & lou ( 2004b ; e.g. , see their subsection 3.2.1 ) . the marginal axisymmetric stability curves generally consist two branches , namely , the collapse branch and the ring - fragmentation branch ( lemos et al . 1991 ; shu et al . 2000 ; lou 2002 ; lou & shen 2003 ; shen & lou 2003 ) . the lowest value of @xmath87 for stability is the maximum of the collapse branch and the highest value of @xmath87 for stability is the minimum of the ring - fragmentation branch . we note that the maximum of the collapse branch is always located at @xmath251 for @xmath252 , while for @xmath253 the maximum of the collapse branch may locate at @xmath223 with @xmath251 corresponding to a local minimum of @xmath87 . it was proven in appendix c of shen & lou ( 2004b ) that @xmath251 is always a local extremum for @xmath87 . variations of the stable range for @xmath87 with parameters @xmath254 , @xmath8 and @xmath77 are shown in panels ( a ) and ( b ) of fig . finally we note that the axisymmetric destabilization involves only the fast mhd wave branch because the slow mhd wave branch is negative and thus unphysical . for non - axisymmetric ( @xmath255 ) perturbations , both fast and slow mhd density waves are possible and stationary global configurations may represent transitions from stable to unstable situations ( e.g. , shu et al . 2000 ) . here , the stability of our slow mhd density waves differs from those models involving finite disc thickness where either vertical or horizontal weak magnetic fields may induce velikhov - chandrasekhar - balbus - hawley instability and magneto - rotational instabilities ( mri ) through slow mhd modes ( chandrasekhar 1961 ; balbus & hawley 1998 ; kim & ostriker 2000 ; lou , yuan & fan 2001 ) . it would be interesting to recall the axisymmetric stability analysis in the wkbj approximation . the local dispersion relation for fast mhd waves in an azimuthal magnetic field is ( fan & lou 1996 ) @xmath256 where @xmath226 is the radial wavenumber and other notations have the conventional meanings . equation ( [ drwkbj ] ) gives the marginal stability curve for axisymmetric @xmath129 perturbations as @xmath257 by using scale - free disc equilibrium condition ( [ propequilib ] ) and inserting @xmath258 for large @xmath226 and @xmath219 into dispersion relation ( [ stability ] ) , we readily obtain the corresponding marginal stability curve in the wkbj regime as @xmath259\xi } { f{\cal c}\xi+(1 + 2\beta)(-2 + 2\beta)}\ , \ ] ] which bears a strong resemblance to expression ( [ msc ] ) of our global analysis , especially in view of the asymptotic expression for @xmath220 , namely @xmath260 when @xmath261 . another equivalent way of this comparison is to note the parallel terms in the wkbj condition ( [ stability ] ) and in the first line of the corresponding global condition ( [ m0u ] ) , also in reference to the above asymptotic expression for @xmath220 . a specific illustrating example of such a comparison is shown in fig . 3 with parameters @xmath19 ( @xmath239 ; flat rotation curve ) , @xmath35 ( full disc ) and @xmath262 . in the short - wavelength limit ( i.e. , @xmath263 ) , the wkbj approximation is well justified and the results are qualitatively consistent , while in the long - wavelength of jeans collapse regime , the wkbj analysis differs from the global exact treatment significantly . , @xmath35 and @xmath262 . the marginal stability curves for the long - wavelength jeans collapse and the short - wavelength ring fragmentation regimes are denoted . for @xmath263 ( i.e. , the short - wavelength limit ) , the wkbj approximation is well applicable , while for small @xmath219 the results in the wkbj approximation deviates from those of the exact global treatment considerably ( see shen & lou 2003 , 2004b ) . ] in parallel with the aligned @xmath127 cases , we now construct unaligned logarithmic spiral solutions from coplanar mhd perturbation equations ( [ stationary1])@xmath128([stationary4 ] ) . for the density - potential pair @xmath230 and @xmath264 , we then have radial flow speed @xmath265 and @xmath266component specific angular momentum @xmath267 . coplanar mhd perturbation equations @xmath155 can therefore be written in the forms of @xmath268\hbox{i}u\ , \\ & m\omega j+r(1-\beta)\omega \hbox{i}u = m\bigg(2\pi g{\cal n}_m -\frac{a^2}{r\sigma_0}\bigg)rs+\frac{c_a^2(1 - 4\beta ) } { 2\omega r}\hbox{i}u\ , \\ & z=-\hbox{i}\xi\frac{b_0iu}{m\omega r}\ , \qquad\qquad\qquad\qquad r=\frac{b_0u}{\omega r}\ . \end{split}\ ] ] the first three equations of set ( [ spiralmge1 ] ) immediately lead to @xmath269 where coefficients @xmath158 , @xmath159 and @xmath160 ( @xmath161 ) are explicitly defined by @xmath270c_a^2}{m\omega r^2}\ , \qquad c_2\equiv \frac{2\omega}{r}\ , \\ & a_3\equiv -mr\bigg(2\pi g{\cal n}_m-\frac{a^2}{\sigma_0 r}\bigg)\ , \qquad\qquad b_3\equiv r(1-\beta)\omega-\frac{(1 - 4\beta)c_a^2}{2\omega r}\ , \qquad\qquad c_3\equiv m\omega\ . \end{split}\ ] ] for nontrivial solutions of the set of homogeneous algebraic equations ( [ sujspiral ] ) , the determinant must vanish @xmath271 by using the set of expressions ( [ abcspiral ] ) and applying equilibrium conditions ( [ propequilib ] ) , we obtain the final dispersion relation for stationary logarithmic spiral @xmath127 mhd configurations in the form of a quadratic equation in terms of @xmath166 , namely @xmath272 where the coefficients @xmath185 , @xmath273 and @xmath274 are explicitly defined by @xmath275q^2 -{\cal a}_m(1-{f}{\cal c}{\cal n}_m)\ , \\ & c_0\equiv -\frac{(1 - 4\beta ) } { 4(1 + 2\beta ) } \bigg[\frac{(-2m^2 - 2\xi^2 - 2\beta+1/2)}{(1 + 2\beta ) } { f}{\cal c}{\cal n}_m+1 - 4\beta\bigg]q^4 -\frac{(-2m^2 - 2\xi^2 - 2\beta+1/2)}{2(1 + 2\beta ) } ( 1-{f}{\cal c}{\cal n}_m)q^2\ , \end{split}\ ] ] with auxiliary parameters defined by @xmath276\ . \end{split}\ ] ] that are the same as those in shen & lou ( 2004b ) for unaligned logarithmic spiral cases . for a positive determinant @xmath277 , the two real solutions to quadratic equation ( [ spiral ] ) are given by @xmath278 similar to @xmath127 cases for aligned perturbations in the limit of vanishing magnetic field ( i.e. , @xmath279 ) , equation ( [ spiral ] ) reduces to @xmath280 that leads to a nontrivial solution @xmath281 solution ( [ spiralnomsol ] ) is exactly the same result for the single - disc case discussed in section 3.2 of shen & lou ( 2004b ) . another limiting regime of @xmath60 has been analyzed by lou ( 2002 ) for global stationary perturbation structures in a single msid . for stationary spiral mhd configurations , we here analyze again the @xmath11 case as a specific example of illustration . the background equilibrium ring magnetic field is force - free and inequality ( [ restrt ] ) is satisfied . the determinant @xmath184 of quadratic equation ( [ spiral ] ) remains always positive as shown in appendix a and hence two real solutions of @xmath282 to equation ( [ spiral ] ) exist . in parallel with the aligned @xmath11 case , we solve quadratic equation ( [ spiral ] ) for given values of parameter @xmath283 and display in diagrams the two branches of solutions @xmath177 and @xmath178 ( @xmath166 ) versus @xmath219 variation . as @xmath284 for @xmath188 and when @xmath283 becomes sufficiently small , there is a diverging point for @xmath192 solution where @xmath193 . since @xmath285 increases monotonically with increasing @xmath219 for @xmath222 and attains its minimum value at @xmath251 ( @xmath285 is an even function of @xmath219 ; see appendix c of shen & lou 2004b ) , the existence of such a critical point @xmath243 for a diverging @xmath166 requires @xmath286 for the specific @xmath11 case , this inequality ( [ criticalf ] ) implies a critical @xmath283 value of @xmath287 $ ] below which there exists one divergent point of @xmath243 where @xmath177 diverges . numerically , we have determined @xmath288 [ note that this @xmath289 is of the same value as that of the aligned @xmath188 case because @xmath290 . for selected @xmath254 values in the range of @xmath291 , the corresponding critical @xmath243 at which @xmath292 can be numerically computed ; for example , we have @xmath293 for @xmath294 . it becomes much simpler for cases of @xmath186 because @xmath185 remains always positive and there is no diverging point for @xmath87 solutions . therefore , @xmath177 and @xmath178 remain always as the upper and lower branches , respectively . for @xmath188 and @xmath190 cases with different parameters of @xmath283 and @xmath77 , we show in four panels @xmath295 of fig . 4 relevant curves of @xmath166 versus @xmath219 variation to illustrate the basic features . to be more explicit for the case of @xmath11 in quadratic equation ( [ spiral ] ) , we write @xmath296d^4 -\bigg[(m^2+\xi^2)\bigg(\frac{2}{3 } { f}{\cal c}{\cal n}_m+1\bigg)q^2\\ & \hbox { } \qquad\qquad\qquad\qquad\qquad\qquad\qquad + \bigg(m^2+\xi^2+\frac{3}{4}\bigg ) ( 1-{f}{\cal c}{\cal n}_m)\bigg]d^2 + \frac{2}{3}(m^2+\xi^2)(1-{f}{\cal c}{\cal n}_m)q^2=0\ , \end{split}\ ] ] where auxiliary parameters @xmath297 , @xmath203 , @xmath204 , @xmath205 and @xmath206 are all evaluated for the special value of @xmath11 . for multi - wavelength observations of nearby spiral galaxies ( sofue et al . 1986 ; kronberg 1994 ; beck et al . 1996 ) , it is possible to identify large - scale spatial phase relationships of spiral patterns using various observational diagnostics ( e.g. , mathewson et al . 1972 ; visser 1980a , b ; neininger 1992 ; beck & hoernes 1996 ; frick et al . 2000 , 2001 ; ferrire 2001 ; lou et al . 2002 ) . for this reason , we derive below spatial phase relationships for various coplanar mhd perturbation variables , keeping in mind of potential applications to magnetized spiral galaxies ( e.g. , fan & lou 1996 ; lou & fan 1998a ) . here we systematically examine the spatial phase relationships among enhancements of gas surface mass density , magnetic field and velocity perturbations by analysing the relationships among @xmath298 , @xmath148 , @xmath73 , @xmath299 and @xmath300 for aligned and logarithmic spiral cases , separately . starting from the set of homogeneous algebraic equations ( [ suj ] ) for the aligned cases , we obtain the relationships among @xmath298 , @xmath301 and @xmath299 in the following , namely @xmath302 where @xmath158 , @xmath159 and @xmath160 ( @xmath161 ) are defined by expressions ( [ abc ] ) . by using definitions ( [ abc ] ) and equations ( [ alignedmge1 ] ) , we obtain @xmath303 for the aligned cases , where the common dimensionless real factor @xmath304 is defined below by @xmath305 similarly , by using the set of homogeneous algebraic equations ( [ sujspiral ] ) , definitions ( [ abcspiral ] ) and equations ( [ spiralmge1 ] ) , we readily derive for the cases of global stationary logarithmic spiral configurations @xmath306\ , \end{split}\ ] ] where the common dimensionless complex factor @xmath307 is defined below by @xmath308 the two sets of algebraic equations ( [ relsurjz ] ) and ( [ relsurjzspiral ] ) are the most general phase relationships for aligned and logarithmic spiral cases , respectively . once a @xmath8 value is specified and a particular @xmath87 for a stationary solution inserted , we immediately obtain the phase relationship between any two perturbation variables . as an example of illustration , we examine again the special @xmath11 case and determine the relevant phase relationships in the next subsection . when @xmath11 , the results of phase relations derived in the last subsection 4.1 can be simplified considerably as all terms involving the factor @xmath309 vanish . meanwhile , inequality ( [ restrt ] ) is automatically satisfied . the only requirement for a physical @xmath87 solution is simply @xmath86 . as already noted in subsections 3.1.3 and 3.2.3 , there are two branches of @xmath87 solutions . we insert relevant physical @xmath87 solutions in equations ( [ relsurjz ] ) and ( [ relsurjzspiral ] ) to determine phase relationships among perturbation variables . in particular , we are interested in the phase relationship between the perturbed surface mass density and the perturbed azimuthal magnetic field . we now analyze below this mass - magnetic field phase relationships for aligned and spiral cases , separately . some illustrative examples are shown in fig . 5 and fig . 6 to provide more direct visual impressions . for aligned @xmath11 cases , we readily find @xmath310 which means the azimuthal magnetic field remains unchanged . from equation ( [ relsurjz ] ) , we derive @xmath311 meanwhile , equation ( [ align0d25 ] ) can be rewritten in the form of @xmath312 } = \frac{d^2\{d^2-(1-f{\cal c}{\cal p}_m)/ [ f{\cal c}{\cal p}_m+3(m^2 - 3/2)/(2m^2 + 3/2)]\ } } { d^2-(1-f{\cal c}{\cal p}_m)/(f{\cal c}{\cal p}_m+3/2 ) } \ , \ ] ] that contains two distinct @xmath87 solutions according to subsection 3.1.3 , namely , the plus - sign solution @xmath177 and the minus - sign solution @xmath178 in the solution form ( [ solalign ] ) , respectively . as shown in appendix b , we emphasize that the plus - sign solution @xmath177 ( if positive and thus physical ) makes @xmath313 and the minus - sign solution @xmath178 makes @xmath314 on the right - hand side of equation ( [ q2aligned ] ) , respectively . therefore , the two branches of @xmath87 solutions ( if positive and thus physical ) will give either @xmath315 for the plus - sign @xmath177 solution or @xmath316 for the minus - sign @xmath178 solution . for spiral cases with @xmath11 , we readily obtain from equations ( [ relsurjzspiral ] ) and ( [ thetas ] ) that @xmath317(3 + 2\hbox{i}\xi)\ .\ ] ] following the same procedure , we can show that the two branches of @xmath87 solutions , namely , the plus - sign solution @xmath177 and the minus - sign solution @xmath178 given by equation ( [ solspiral ] ) , if positive and thus physical , correspond to the factor @xmath318 being positive and negative , respectively ( see appendix b for a detailed proof ) . we now examine the phase relationship between coplanar perturbation enhancements of surface mass density and magnetic field . in the short - wavelength limit ( i.e. , @xmath263 with a logarithmic spiral pattern tightly wound ) , we have @xmath319 and @xmath320 where the plus- and minus - signs correspond to the @xmath177 and @xmath178 solutions , respectively . the phase relations between perturbation enhancements of surface mass density and magnetic field are in - phase for the @xmath177 solution ( if positive and physical ) and out - of - phase for the @xmath178 solution . for @xmath186 , @xmath177 remains always greater than @xmath178 . in contexts of magnetized spiral galaxies , these solution properties in the wkbj regime are consistent with the physical identifications of the @xmath177 mode with a stationary fast mhd density wave and the @xmath178 mode with a stationary slow mhd density wave , respectively ( fan & lou 1996 ; lou & fan 1998a ; lou & fan 2002 ) . it is now possible to model magnetized spiral galaxies in terms of coplanar stationary fast and slow mhd density waves with more general rotation curves including the case of a flat rotation curve for a magnetized singular isothermal disc ( shu et al . 2000 ; lou 2002 ; lou & fan 2002 ; lou & zou 2004a , b ; lou & wu 2004 ) . in the long - wavelength limit ( i.e. , @xmath321 with a logarithmic spiral pattern widely open ) , we have @xmath322 and @xmath323 where the minus- and plus - signs correspond to the @xmath177 and @xmath178 solutions , respectively . therefore , the coplanar perturbation enhancement of magnetic field is either ahead of or lagging behind the perturbation enhancement of surface mass density by a phase difference of @xmath324 . for intermediate radial wavelengths , the phase difference between perturbation enhancements of surface mass density and magnetic field in a logarithmic spiral pattern can be readily determined for given specific conditions . on the basis of our model analysis here , it appears that except for global stationary fast mhd density waves in the extreme wkbj regime , magnetic and gas spiral arms tend to be phase shifted relative to each other for a global stationary logarithmic spiral pattern for a much broader set of rotation curves including the special case of a flat rotation curve . one can readily show that for aligned global stationary mhd perturbation configurations , there is no net radial angular momentum flux as aligned stationary mhd density waves do not propagate radially ( shu et al . 2000 ; lou 2002 ) . we here briefly discuss the process of angular momentum transfer in association with the stationary logarithmic spiral mhd modes obtained in this paper . according to the analyses of lynden - bell & kalnajs ( 1972 ) and fan & lou ( 1999 ) , the total angular momentum flux carried by coplanar mhd density waves should contain three separate contributions , namely , the advective transport flux @xmath325 defined by @xmath326 the gravity torque flux @xmath327 defined by @xmath328\bigg[\frac{\partial\re(\phi_1 ) } { \partial r}\bigg]\\ ] ] and the magnetic torque flux @xmath329 defined by @xmath330 the perturbed three - dimensional gravitational potential @xmath331 associated with a fourier component of a coplanar logarithmic spiral perturbation in surface mass density @xmath332 is then @xmath333 where @xmath334 is the cylindrical bessel function of order @xmath109 with an argument @xmath23 ( e.g. , binney & tremaine 1987 ) . in fact , integral ( [ 3dphi1 ] ) gives a simple form of kalnajs function in the disc plane at @xmath335 with the real part of @xmath331 explicitly given by @xmath336 it is fairly straightforward to show that @xmath325 and @xmath329 are independent of @xmath14 where the phase relationships for stationary logarithmic spiral cases derived in section 4.1 have been use . while mathematically tedious , one can further show that @xmath327 is also independent of @xmath14 ( see appendix c ) . therefore , the total angular momentum flux @xmath337 remains constant at all radii , a natural result of angular momentum conservation given that perturbation surface mass density falls off as @xmath181 . therefore , in order to maintain a stationary logarithmic spiral pattern , there must be a source or a sink at the disc center . the perturbation energy flux , however , is zero at all radii for the stationary coplanar mhd configurations [ see equation ( 4.17 ) of fan & lou ( 1999 ) in the wkbj regime ] . the mass flux is also zero at all radii since the first - order mass flux @xmath338 , and the second - order mass flux @xmath339 [ where @xmath340 is the second - order perturbed radial velocity , this equation holds due to the second - order mass conservation ( fan & lou 1999 ) ] . therefore our model result differs from that of spruit ( 1987 ) for stationary logarithmic spiral shocks , where only the gravity of the central object is considered . in spruit s model , there is a net mass accretion through the disc and an effective viscosity parameter `` @xmath7 '' ( shakura & sunyaev 1973 ) may be estimated . physically , the central source of angular momentum required to sustain global stationary logarithmic spiral patterns may be plausibly identified with a fast spinning supermassive black hole ( smbh ) in the nucleus of a spiral galaxy . the kerr spacetime associated with such a spinning smbh excites and sustains mhd density waves in the surrounding disc through a long - range gravitational interaction . for trailing spiral patterns , a net flux of angular momentum is transport radially outward in the disc . conceptually , this process should cause the spinning smbh to gradually slow down , entirely analogous to the spin - down of a rotating neutron star by emitting electromagnetic waves that carry a net angular momentum away . in this paper , we have explored and analyzed stationary perturbation structures in coplanarly magnetized razor - thin scale - free discs in a more general manner . to be specific , we start from a rotational and magnetized background equilibrium of axisymmetry that is dynamically self - consistent with a surface mass density @xmath341 , a rotation curve @xmath2 , a purely azimuthal ( ring ) magnetic field @xmath1 with a vertically integrated barotropic equation of state in the form of @xmath16 . the radial force balance at all radii in an mhd disc implies several simple relationships among these power indices @xmath7 , @xmath8 , @xmath9 and @xmath6 , as stated explicitly in equation ( [ pararelation ] ) . without loss of generality , we can simply use @xmath8 as an independent parameter to specify properties of an important class of radial variations for rotational mhd background equilibria . the allowed range of @xmath8 falls within the interval @xmath71 ( syer & tremaine 1996 ; shen & lou 2004a , b ) with the special case of @xmath19 corresponding to a magnetized singular isothermal disc ( msid ) system ( shu et al . 2000 ; lou 2002 ; lou & fan 2002 ; lou & zou 2004a , b ; lou & wu 2004 ) . for clarity and convenience of our analysis , we introduced several dimensionless parameters . the first parameter is the partial disc parameter @xmath34 for the ratio of the gravitational potential ( @xmath342 ) arising from the disc to that ( @xmath28 ) arising from the entire system ( syer & tremaine 1996 ; shu et al . 2000 ; lou 2002 ) including an axisymmetric halo mass distribution that is involved in the background equilibrium but is presumed to be unresponsive to coplanar mhd disc disturbances ( a massive dark matter halo is an example in mind ) ; for a partial disc system , we have @xmath343 , while for a full disc system , we have @xmath344 by conventional definitions . the second parameter is an effective rotational mach number @xmath82 defined as the ratio of the disc rotation speed to the sound speed yet with an additional scaling factor @xmath345 ; @xmath82 is constant at all radii . the third parameter @xmath77 is a measure for the background ring magnetic field strength defined as the ratio of the azimuthal alfvn speed to the sound speed ; and @xmath77 remains constant at all radii . for @xmath89 , there is no constraint on @xmath77 and the net lorentz force of the background azimuthal magnetic field is radially outward ( the magnetic pressure force is stronger than the magnetic tension force ) to resist the self - gravitation ; for @xmath11 , the background azimuthal magnetic field is force - free ( the magnetic pressure and tension forces cancel each other exactly ) ; for @xmath88 , the net lorentz force of the background azimuthal magnetic field points radially inward ( the magnetic pressure force is weaker than the magnetic tension force ) to aggravate the self - gravity and thus a restriction [ i.e. , inequality ( [ restrt ] ) ] is imposed on the magnetic field strength in order to guarantee that the surface mass density be positive in equation ( [ propequilib ] ) . inequality ( [ restrt ] ) provides a necessary physical criterion for plausible @xmath87 solutions . with such a rotational mhd background equilibrium chosen , we introduce coplanar mhd disturbances to construct global stationary perturbation structures as viewed in an inertial frame of reference . perturbation variables are expressed in terms of fourier components for either aligned or logarithmic spiral pattern forms ( syer & tremaine 1996 ; shu et al . 2000 ; lou 2002 ; lou & shen 2003 ; shen & lou 2003 ; lou & zou 2004a ) . we derive analytical solutions for stationary coplanar mhd perturbation configurations in both aligned and logarithmic spiral cases . we now summarize key results below . 1 . cases of aligned coplanar mhd perturbations 0.2 cm + for aligned cases , we choose perturbation variables that bear the same power - law dependence in radius @xmath14 as the background mhd equilibrium does . for the special aligned case of @xmath129 , the stationary coplanar mhd perturbations actually describe alternative equilibria to the axisymmetric background equilibrium with proper rescaling factors ( shu et al . 2000 ; lou 2002 ; lou & zou 2004a ) and are therefore somewhat trivial . + for aligned cases of @xmath127 , we derive a quadratic equation ( [ aligned ] ) in terms of @xmath166 . the resulting positive @xmath87 is the rotational parameter required for sustaining a stationary nonaxisymmetric mhd perturbation configuration . other parameters involved in quadratic equation ( [ aligned ] ) include @xmath8 , @xmath109 , @xmath283 and @xmath77 . for a general combination of @xmath8 , @xmath109 , @xmath283 and @xmath77 , the determinant @xmath184 of quadratic equation ( [ aligned ] ) may not be always positive definite . on the other hand , for specific values of @xmath8 , equation ( [ aligned ] ) always gives two different real solutions ( see appendix a ) . once we prescribe parameters @xmath8 , @xmath109 , @xmath283 and @xmath77 , the two solutions of @xmath87 can be readily determined . for physical solutions , @xmath87 must be positive and satisfy inequality ( [ restrt ] ) simultaneously . + as a specific case study , we examined the case of @xmath11 . here the background azimuthal magnetic field remains force - free and the @xmath87 solution is free from constraint ( [ restrt ] ) . it has been further shown in appendix a that for this @xmath11 case , equation ( [ aligned ] ) always has two distinct real solutions , the plus - signed solution @xmath177 and the minus - signed solution @xmath178 , as contained in equation ( [ solalign ] ) . all these aspects contribute to a significant simplification of the relevant computational procedures . we derive two branches of @xmath87 solutions and need to require only @xmath346 . there is yet a qualitative difference between the @xmath188 case and the @xmath186 cases . for @xmath188 , there exists one critical value @xmath347 ; for @xmath283 below @xmath289 , @xmath177 and @xmath178 are negative and positive , respectively , while @xmath283 above @xmath289 , both branches of @xmath87 solutions are positive and thus physical . for @xmath186 in comparison , both branches of @xmath87 solutions remain always positive and thus physical . moreover , @xmath177 remains always to be the upper branch for azimuthal stationary fast mhd density waves and represents the hydrodynamic counterpart of the unmagnetized single disc case ; complementarily , @xmath178 remains always to be the lower branch for azimuthal stationary slow mhd density waves ( fan & lou 1996 ; lou & fan 1998a ) and is caused by the very presence of the azimuthal magnetic field ( detailed computations reveal that @xmath178 must be smaller than @xmath348 which seems to be too small for galactic applications ) . when a disc rotates sufficiently fast , it could only support the upper @xmath177 stationary mhd configurations . an increase of magnetic field parameter @xmath77 will raise both physical branches of @xmath87 solutions as displayed in fig . the variation trend of the upper @xmath177 branch appears to be more sensitive . therefore for a much stronger magnetic field , a sufficiently rapidly rotating disc may sustain stationary coplanar mhd configurations in terms of the upper @xmath349 branch . + 0.2 cm 2 . cases of logarithmic spiral configurations for coplanar mhd perturbations 0.2 cm + for cases of stationary spiral perturbation structures , we choose coplanar mhd perturbations in terms of kalnajs logarithmic spirals ( kalnajs 1971 ; lemos et al . 1991 ; shu et al . 2000 ; lou 2002 ; lou & fan 2002 ; lou & shen 2003 ; lou & zou 2004a ; lou & wu 2004 ) . for the special @xmath129 case with radial propagations , it happens that inequality ( [ restrt ] ) is automatically satisfied and the stationary coplanar mhd configurations with @xmath350 obtained here represent marginal stability curves ( syer & tremaine 1996 ; shu et al . 2000 ; shen & lou 2003 , 2004b ; lou & zou 2004b ) . only when the rotational parameter @xmath87 falls within a specific finite range can the magnetized disc be stable against axisymmetric disturbances at all wavelengths . a disc with too slow a rotation speed will succumb to jeans instability in the collapse regime corresponding to long wavelength perturbations , while a disc with too fast a rotation speed will suffer the ring - fragmentation instability corresponding to relatively short wavelength perturbations ( safronov 1960 ; toomre 1964 ; lemos et al . 1991 ; lou & fan 1998a , 2000 ; shu et al . 2000 ; shen & lou 2003 , 2004a ; lou & zou 2004b ) . in comparison to a hydrodynamics disc system , the enhancement of azimuthal magnetic field tends to suppress ring - fragmentation instabilities as expected from the perspective of the mhd @xmath351 parameter ( lou & fan 1998a ; lou 2002 ; lou & zou 2004a , b ) , while an enhancement of azimuthal magnetic field tends to suppress jeans collapse instabilities for @xmath88 , to aggravate jeans collapse instabilities for @xmath89 and to bear no effect on jeans collapse instabilities when @xmath11 . we have provided intuitive interpretations for the roles of magnetic field earlier . + in parallel with the aligned cases , we derive quadratic equation ( [ spiral ] ) in terms of @xmath166 for logarithmic spiral cases of @xmath127 . in addition to the four parameters @xmath8 , @xmath109 , @xmath283 and @xmath77 , we now have one more parameter @xmath219 for the radial wavenumber . while the determinant @xmath184 of quadratic equation ( [ spiral ] ) may not be always positive in general , we prove in appendix a that @xmath352 for the specific @xmath11 case . once the five parameters @xmath8 , @xmath109 , @xmath283 , @xmath77 and @xmath219 are specified , the @xmath87 solutions can be readily obtained . for physical solutions , @xmath87 must be non - negative and also satisfy inequality ( [ restrt ] ) . + as an example of illustration , we study the specific @xmath11 case inequality ( [ restrt ] ) being satisfied automatically . not surprisingly , the aligned cases and the logarithmic spiral cases parallel with each other very well , because of a mere change of wave propagation direction . for the special spiral case of @xmath188 , there again exists the same critical @xmath347 for @xmath283 value as in the aligned @xmath188 case ; for @xmath353 , there is one critical point of @xmath243 where @xmath354 diverges . more specifically , we have unphysical @xmath355 for @xmath356 , while we have physical @xmath357 for @xmath247 . there is no divergent point for @xmath87 solution branch and we always have @xmath358 ( @xmath359 when @xmath174 ) . the solution structures become simpler for @xmath186 cases when both @xmath87 branches of solutions are non - negative and there is no divergent point of @xmath354 . moreover , @xmath177 remains always to be the upper branch for stationary spiral fast mhd density waves and is the hydrodynamic counterpart for those in the unmagnetized single disc case , while @xmath178 remains always to be the lower branch for stationary spiral slow mhd density waves ( fan & lou 1996 ) and is caused by the very presence of the magnetic field ( detailed computations reveal @xmath178 must be smaller than @xmath348 ) . + 0.2 cm 3 . phase relationships among coplanar mhd perturbation variables 0.2 cm + so far , we have constructed global stationary coplanar mhd configurations for both aligned and logarithmic spiral cases in magnetized discs with a range of rotation curves . as expected , the inclusion of azimuthal magnetic field gives rise to one additional distinct physical solution for stationary slow mhd density waves to the problem ( fan & lou 1996 ; lou & fan 1998a ; lou 2002 ; lou & zou 2004a ) ; the alfvnic modes are excluded by our restricted consideration for coplanar mhd perturbations . the two @xmath87 branches of solutions are at least mathematically reasonable and may both have applications to astrophysical disc systems such as magnetized disc galaxies and so forth . these devised mhd disc problems are highly idealized with yet precious global analytical perturbation solutions , and conceptually still belong to a subclass of more general time - dependent mhd perturbation solutions . for applications to magnetized spiral galaxies , it would be of considerable interest to discuss pertinent physical aspects and identify relevant observational diagnostics . + for physical solutions of @xmath86 , the @xmath177 branch would be applicable to mhd discs with relatively fast rotation while the @xmath178 branch would be applicable to mhd discs with relatively slow rotation in general . for spatial phase relationships , the two branches of @xmath86 solutions give different results . we take the specific @xmath11 case as an example of illustration . for corresponding aligned cases , the plus - solution @xmath177 will lead to @xmath315 and the minus - solution @xmath178 will lead to @xmath316 ; there are no azimuthal magnetic field perturbations for aligned @xmath11 cases . for tightly wound logarithmic spiral cases , perturbations of both radial and azimuthal magnetic field are approximately in phase with the perturbation enhancement of the surface mass density for the @xmath177 branch , while they are approximately out of phase for the @xmath178 branch . for open logarithmic spirals , the radial and azimuthal magnetic field perturbations are either ahead of or lagging behind the enhancement of the surface mass by a significant phase difference . these phase relationships together with those associated with flow perturbations ( visser 1980a , b ) are valuable to interpret the spatial phase shifts between optical arms and magnetic arms in lopsided , barred or other spiral galaxies ( mathewson et al . 1972 ; neininger 1992 ; beck & hoernes 1996 ; beck et al . 1996 ; fan & lou 1996 ; lou & fan 1998 , 2000 , 2002 ; frick et al . 2000 , 2001 ; lou et al . + 0.2 cm 4 . angular momentum transfer in steady logarithmic spirals for coplanar mhd perturbation configurations 0.2 cm + stationary logarithmic spiral configurations of mhd density waves carry constant angular momentum flux either outward or inward associated with the advective transport , the gravity torque and the magnetic torque ( lynden - bell & kalnajs 1972 ; goldreich & tremaine 1978 ; fan & lou 1999 ) . therefore , the net angular momentum flux in the entire disc system is conserved and there must be either a source or a sink at the disc center . for the @xmath177 branch with @xmath86 , we find that the total angular momentum flux is inward for leading ( i.e. , @xmath223 ) spiral mhd density waves and is outward for trailing ( i.e. , @xmath224 ) spiral mhd density waves . for the @xmath178 branch in comparison , the total angular momentum flux is outward for leading ( i.e. , @xmath223 ) spiral mhd density waves and is inward for trailing ( i.e. , @xmath224 ) spiral mhd density waves . as a real mhd disc system typically rotates at a relatively large @xmath87 and inequality ( [ restrt ] ) can also rule out small @xmath87 for @xmath360 , the lower @xmath178 branch might be rarely useful in galactic applications . in either case , however , the net mass accretion rate is zero since if we focus on materials between two concentric circles , at any time the influent angular momentum from the inner ring is equal to the effluent angular momentum from the outer ring such that materials inside this belt neither gain nor lose any angular momentum and therefore no net mass accretion occurs . this research has been supported in part by the asci center for astrophysical thermonuclear flashes at the university of chicago under department of energy contract b341495 , by the special funds for major state basic science research projects of china , by the tsinghua center for astrophysics , by the collaborative research fund from the national natural science foundation of china ( nsfc ) for young outstanding overseas chinese scholars ( nsfc 10028306 ) at the national astronomical observatory , chinese academy of sciences , by nsfc grant 10373009 at the tsinghua university , and by the yangtze endowment from the ministry of education through the tsinghua university . affiliated institutions of y.q.l . share this contribution . 9 balbus s. a. , hawley j. f. , 1998 , rev . , 70 , 1 beck r. , brandenburg a. , moss d. , shukurov a. , sokoloff d. , 1996 , ara&a , 34 , 155 beck r. , hoernes p. , 1996 , nat , 379 , 47 binney j. , tremaine s. , 1987 , galactic dynamics . princeton university press , princeton , new jersey caunt s. e. , tagger m. , 2001 , a&a , 367 , 1095 chandrasekhar s. , 1961 , hydrodynamic and hydromagnetic stability . dover , new york elmegreen b. g. , 1995 , mnras , 275 , 944 evans n. w. , read j. c. a. , 1998a , mnras , 300 , 83 evans n. w. , read j. c. a. , 1998b , mnras , 300 , 106 fan z. h. , lou y .- q . , 1996 , nat , 383 , 800 fan z. h. , lou y .- q . , 1999 , mnras , 307 , 645 ferrire k. m. , 2001 , rev . mod . phys . , 73 , 1031 frick p. , beck r. , shukurov a. , sokoloff d. , ehle m. , kamphuis j. , 2000 , mnras , 318 , 925 frick p. , beck r. , berkhuijsen e. m. , patrickeyev i. , 2001 , mnras , 327 , 1145 goodman j. , evans n. w. , 1999 , mnras , 309 , 599 goldreich p. , lynden - bell d. , 1965 , mnras , 130 , 125 goldreich p. , tremaine s. , 1978 , icarus , 34 , 240 jog c. j. , 1996 , mnras , 278 , 209 julian w. h. , toomre a. , 1966 , apj , 146 , 810 kalnajs a. j. , 1971 , apj , 166 , 275 kim w .- , ostriker e. c. , 2000 , apj , 540 , 372 kronberg p. p. , 1994 , reports on progress in physics , 57 , 325 lemos j. p. s. , kalnajs a. j. , lynden - bell d. , 1991 , apj , 375 , 484 lin c. c. , shu f. h. , 1964 , apj , 140 , 646 lou y .- q . , 2002 , mnras , 337 , 225 lou y .- q . , fan z. h. , 1998a , apj , 493 , 102 lou y .- q . , fan z. h. , 1998b , mnras , 297 , 84 lou y .- q . , fan z. h. , 2000 , mnras , 315 , 646 lou y .- q . , fan z. h. , 2002 , mnras , 329 , l62 lou y.q . , walsh w. m. , han j. l. , fan z. h. , 2002 , apj , 567 , 289 lou y. q. , yuan c. , fan z. h. , 2001 , apj , 552 , 189 lou y. q. , yuan c. , fan z. h. , leon s. , 2001 , apj , 553 , l35 lou y .- q . , shen y. , 2003 , mnras , 343 , 750 ( astro - ph/0304270 ) lou y .- q . , wu y. , 2004 , mnras , submitted lou y .- q . , zou y. , 2004a , mnras , 350 , 1220 ( astro - ph/0312082 ) lou y .- q . , zou y. , 2004b , mnras , submitted low b. c. , lou y .- q . , 1990 , apj , 352 , 343 lynden - bell d. , kalnajs a. j. , 1972 , mnras , 157 , 1 lynden - bell d. , lemos j. p. s. , 1993 , preprint ( astro - ph/9907093 ) mathewson d. s. , van der kruit p. c. , brouw w. n. , 1972 , a&a , 17,468 mestel l. , 1963 , mnras , 126 , 553 neininger n. , 1992 , a&a , 263 , 30 qian e. , 1992 , mnras , 257 , 581 rdiger g. , kitchatinov l. l. , 2000 , astro . nachr . , 3 , 181 safronov v. s. , 1960 , ann . , 23 , 979 shakura n. i. , sunyaev r. a. , 1973 , a&a , 24 , 337 shen y. , lou y .- q . , 2003 , mnras , 345 , 1340 ( astro - ph/0308063 ) shen y. , lou y .- q . , 2004a , chjaa , in press ( astro - ph/0404190 ) shen y. , lou y .- q . , 2004b , mnras , 353 , 249 ( astro - ph/0405444 ) shu f. h. , laughlin g. , lizano s. , galli d. , 2000 , apj , 535 , 190 shu f. h. , li z .- y . , 1997 , apj , 475 , 251 sofue y. , fujimoto m. , wielebinski r. , 1986 , ara&a , 24 , 459 spruit h. c. , 1987 , a&a , 184 , 173 syer d. , tremaine s. , 1996 , mnras , 281 , 925 tagger m. , pellat r. , 1999 , a&a , 349 , 1003 toomre a. , 1964 , apj , 139 , 1217 toomre a. , 1977 , ara&a , 15 , 437 visser h. c. d. , 1980a , a&a , 88 , 149 visser h. c. d. , 1980b , a&a , 88 , 159 widrow l. m. , 2002 , rev . phys . , 74 , 775 zang t. a. , 1976 , phd thesis , mit , cambridge ma for @xmath127 , we first examine the solution criterion of quadratic equation ( [ aligned ] ) for the aligned case . the determinant @xmath184 of quadratic equation ( [ aligned ] ) is @xmath361 where the three coefficients @xmath362 ( @xmath363 ) are defined explicitly by @xmath364 ^ 2\\ & \qquad\qquad\qquad\qquad\qquad + \frac{(1 - 4\beta)}{(1 + 2\beta ) } \bigg[\frac{-2m^2+(1 - 4\beta)(1 - 2\beta)}{(1 + 2\beta)}{f } { \cal c}{\cal p}_m+1 - 4\beta\bigg]{\cal h}_m\ , \\ c_1\equiv\ & 2(1-{f}{\cal c}{\cal p}_m)\bigg\{{\cal a}_m \bigg[\frac{(3 - 4\beta)m^2-(1 - 4\beta)(1 - 6\beta+4\beta^2)}{2(1 + 2\beta ) } { f}{\cal c}{\cal p}_m+m^2-(1 - 4\beta)(2-\beta)\bigg]\\ & \qquad\qquad\qquad\qquad\qquad + \frac{-2m^2+(1 - 4\beta)(1 - 2\beta)}{(1 + 2\beta)}{\cal h}_m\bigg\}\ , \\ c_0\equiv\ & { \cal a}_m^2(1-{f}{\cal c}{\cal p}_m)^2\ , \end{split}\ ] ] respectively . for the quadratic expression ( [ a01 ] ) in terms of @xmath81 , we further introduce another determinant @xmath365 such that @xmath366 [ ( 1 + 8\beta)m^2-(1 - 4\beta)(1 + 4\beta-8\beta^2)]\ .\ ] ] the determinant @xmath184 of quadratic equation ( [ aligned ] ) in terms of @xmath87 can be either positive or negative in general for different parameter combinations of @xmath8 , @xmath109 , @xmath77 and @xmath283 . it is fairly straightforward to obtain @xmath87 solutions by assigning values of all relevant parameters . in particular , for one important case of @xmath19 ( i.e. , the msid case with a flat rotation curve and an isothermal equation of state ) , the condition that @xmath172 for @xmath127 and @xmath367 when @xmath188 holds for all values of @xmath81 in a full msid with @xmath344 and the condition that @xmath352 for @xmath127 holds in a partial msid with @xmath343 ( lou 2002 ) . for the magnetic force - free case of @xmath11 with a declining rotation curve with increasing @xmath14 and a polytropic index @xmath182 , we have @xmath352 for @xmath127 and an arbitrary @xmath368 in both full and partial magnetized discs . we now proceed to prove this statement rigorously . for @xmath11 of the aligned case , we explicitly have @xmath369 ^ 2\ , \qquad c_1\equiv 2(1-{f}{\cal c}{\cal p}_m)m^2 [ { \cal a}_m(2{f}{\cal c}{\cal p}_m/3 + 1)-4{\cal h}_m/3]\ , \qquad c_0\equiv { \cal a}_m^2(1-{f}{\cal c}{\cal p}_m)^2\ , \ ] ] where @xmath209 and @xmath370 for @xmath11 and @xmath365 introduced above simply reduces to @xmath371 it is apparent that for @xmath372 , we have @xmath373 . as @xmath374 , it follows immediately that @xmath352 in definition ( [ a01 ] ) . on the other hand for @xmath375 , we have @xmath376 and therefore @xmath352 by definition ( [ a01 ] ) . for @xmath11 in the logarithmic spiral case , we again have the determinant @xmath352 for quadratic equation ( [ spiral ] ) , where in parallel with definitions ( [ a01 ] ) and ( [ a02 ] ) of the aligned case , the relevant parameters in the spiral case are @xmath377 ^ 2\ , \ c_1=2(1-{f}{\cal c } { \cal n}_m)(m^2+\xi^2)\bigg[{\cal a}_m\bigg(\frac{2}{3}{f } { \cal c}{\cal n}_m+1\bigg)-\frac{4}{3}{\cal h}_m\bigg]\ , \ c_0={\cal a}_m^2(1-{f}{\cal c}{\cal n}_m)^2\ , \ ] ] with @xmath378 and @xmath370 for @xmath11 . and @xmath365 simply reduces to @xmath379 hence , as the aligned @xmath11 case , it is apparent that for @xmath372 , we have @xmath373 . as @xmath374 , it follows immediately that @xmath352 . on the other hand for @xmath380 , we have @xmath376 and therefore @xmath352 . in this appendix , we first provide a proof that for the aligned case of @xmath11 , the physical @xmath87 solutions of the plus @xmath357 and the minus @xmath381 determined from quadratic equation ( [ q2aligned ] ) correspond to the factor @xmath382 being positive and negative , respectively . according to appendix a , the determinant @xmath184 for both aligned and spiral cases remains always positive for the case of @xmath11 . we start from equation ( [ q2aligned ] ) by casting it in the following compact form of @xmath383 where @xmath166 and in reference to equation ( [ q2aligned ] ) , @xmath384 , @xmath385 and @xmath386 are constants defined explicitly by @xmath387 } \ .\ ] ] it is apparent that @xmath385 is always positive . while @xmath384 and @xmath386 remain always positive for @xmath186 , their signs depend on the value of @xmath283 for the special case of @xmath188 . in fact , both @xmath384 and @xmath386 diverge at a critical value of @xmath283 for the @xmath188 case as already discussed in subsection 3.1.3 . let us first analyze the simpler cases of @xmath186 . as @xmath388 and @xmath389 , we have two @xmath87 solutions @xmath390^{1/2}}{2 } & > \frac{\wp_2+\wp_3+|\wp_2-\wp_3|}{2}\ge \wp_2\ ; \\ y_2=\frac{\wp_1+\wp_3-[(\wp_1+\wp_3)^2 - 4\wp_2\wp_3]^{1/2}}{2 } & = \frac{\wp_1+\wp_3-[(\wp_1+\wp_3 - 2\wp_2)^2 + 4\wp_2(\wp_1-\wp_2)]^{1/2}}{2}\\ & < \frac{\wp_1+\wp_3-|\wp_1+\wp_3 - 2\wp_2|}{2}\le \wp_2\ . \end{split}\ ] ] we next examine the @xmath188 case . the situation becomes somewhat involved since @xmath391 , @xmath392 when @xmath291 where the critical @xmath283 value @xmath393\simeq 0.6842 $ ] is determined from the condition @xmath292 ( see subsection 3.1.3 ) . on the other hand , we have @xmath394 when @xmath395 in general . for the aligned case and @xmath178 are consistent with the general solution form ( [ solalign ] ) for the aligned case . ] and for @xmath291 , we therefore have two @xmath87 solutions satisfying inequalities @xmath396^{1/2}}{2}<0\ ; \\ 0<y_2&=\frac{\wp_1+\wp_3+[(\wp_1+\wp_3)^2 - 4\wp_2\wp_3]^{1/2}}{2 } \\ & = \frac{\wp_1+\wp_3+[(\wp_1+\wp_3 - 2\wp_2)^2 + 4\wp_2(\wp_1-\wp_2)]^{1/2}}{2}\\ & < \frac{\wp_1+\wp_3+|\wp_1+\wp_3 - 2\wp_2|}{2}=\wp_2\ , \end{split}\ ] ] and for @xmath395 the situation remains the same as ( [ b2 ] ) . for the spiral case of @xmath11 in parallel , we can repeat this same procedure of analysis . as before , we cast quadratic equation ( [ beta0d25s ] ) in the form of @xmath397 } \\ & \qquad\qquad\qquad\qquad\qquad\qquad\qquad\qquad = \frac{d^2\ { d^2-(1-{f}{\cal c}{\cal n}_m)/ [ { f}{\cal c}{\cal n}_m+3(m^2 - 3/2)/(2m^2 + 2\xi^2 + 3/2)]\ } } { d^2-(1-{f}{\cal c}{\cal n}_m)/ ( { f}{\cal c}{\cal n}_m+3/2)}\ , \end{split}\ ] ] which yields two distinct @xmath87 solutions according to the analysis in subsection 3.2.3 . the following treatment is identical to that for the aligned @xmath11 case described in the first part of this appendix . we here provide a proof to show that the angular momentum flux associated with stationary coplanar mhd perturbations due to the gravity torque @xmath327 , the advective transport @xmath325 and the magnetic torque @xmath329 remains constant at all radii for the entire range @xmath10 . we start from expression ( [ rmphi ] ) for @xmath398 to derive the following two expressions in a straightforward manner : @xmath399j_m(k^{\prime}r ) \int_0^{\infty}r_a^{\prime\ -1/2}\cos(m\theta-\xi\ln r_a^{\prime})j_m(k^{\prime}r_a^{\prime})dr_a^{\prime}\ . \end{split}\ ] ] then in integral ( [ gravangm ] ) , we first integrate the kernel over @xmath400 to yield @xmath401dkdk^{\prime}\ , \ ] ] where @xmath402dr_adr_a^{\prime}\ .\ ] ] we next integrate over the vertical coordinate @xmath403 to yield the final result @xmath404dkdk^{\prime}\ .\ ] ] by introducing the following integral transformation @xmath405 we reduce expression ( [ final ] ) to @xmath406dxdx^{\prime}\ , \ ] ] where @xmath407dr_bdr_b^{\prime}={\cal n}_mx^{-1/2}x^{\prime\ -1/2}\sin\bigg[\xi\ln\bigg(\frac{x}{x^{\prime}}\bigg)\bigg]\ , \ ] ] where @xmath297 is the kalnajs function ( kalnajs 1971 ) . with these technical preparations , we finally determine the angular momentum flux associated with coplanar stationary mhd perturbations due to the gravity torque as @xmath408 where @xmath409dxdx^{\prime}\ , \ ] ] which is clearly independent of radius @xmath14 . in the tight - winding regime or the wkbj limit ( i.e. , @xmath410 ) , we may directly apply the result of fan & lou ( 1999 , see their eqn . 4.13 ) by noting @xmath411 such that @xmath412 where @xmath413 has been defined by equation ( [ thetas ] ) ; here , @xmath414 is inward for leading ( @xmath223 ) spiral waves and outward for trailing ( @xmath224 ) spiral waves . in general , @xmath415 can be calculated via numerical integrations and the specific result is displayed in fig . c1 . for fairly open mhd density waves ( @xmath416 ) with @xmath417 , the angular momentum flux associated with the gravity torque is therefore inward for leading ( @xmath223 ) spiral waves and outward for trailing ( @xmath224 ) spiral waves ; with increasing @xmath418 , @xmath415 falls off rapidly and oscillates around zero with the envelope profile closely fitting the wkbj result better and better . versus @xmath219 , shown in heavy solid line . we plot @xmath419 in light dashed line for comparison . for increasing @xmath418 , @xmath415 oscillates around zero and its envelope profile fits the @xmath419 curve with an increasing accuracy . ] meanwhile , we compute the other two perturbation contributions to the angular momentum flux , namely , those from the advective transfer and the magnetic torque . for the part of advective transport , we start from equation ( [ adveangm ] ) and make use of phase relationship ( [ relsurjzspiral ] ) to explicitly derive @xmath420r^{-1/2}\cos(\xi\ln r - m\theta)\\ & \qquad\qquad\qquad\qquad\qquad\qquad\qquad\ -(\omega\sigma/\sigma_0)[(1/2+\beta)\im(\theta_s ) -\xi\re(\theta_s)]r^{-1/2}\sin(\xi\ln r - m\theta)\ . \end{split}\ ] ] it immediately follows that the advective torque is given by @xmath421=m\pi^2g\sigma^2\xi^a\ , \ ] ] where @xmath422 } { { f}{\cal c}[1+d^2-(1 - 4\beta)q^2/(2 + 4\beta)]}\ , \ ] ] that is independent of radius @xmath14 . by specifying parameters @xmath8 , @xmath109 , @xmath283 , @xmath77 and @xmath219 , one finds that for the @xmath177 branch @xmath423 for @xmath223 and @xmath424 for @xmath224 . therefore , the advective angular momentum flux is radially inward for leading stationary spiral density waves and radially outward for trailing stationary spiral density waves for the @xmath177 branch of @xmath87 solutions . for the @xmath178 branch in comparison , the situation switches and the advective angular momentum flux is outward for leading stationary spiral density waves and inward for trailing stationary spiral density waves . practically , to achieve the @xmath178 branch of stationary logarithmic spiral configurations requires a much lower @xmath87 which would be unusual for real magnetized disc systems . an example of illustration for @xmath190 , @xmath344 and @xmath11 is shown in panel ( a ) of fig . c2 . for the momentum flux associated with the magnetic torque , we start from equation ( [ magnangm ] ) and make use of phase relationship ( [ relsurjzspiral ] ) to first derive @xmath425 \ r^{-3/2}\sin(\xi\ln r - m\theta ) + [ mb_0\sigma\im(\theta_s)/\sigma_0]\ r^{-3/2 } \cos(\xi\ln r - m\theta)\ , \\ & \re(b_\theta)=[\xi b_0\sigma\re(\theta_s ) /\sigma_0]\ r^{-3/2}\sin(\xi\ln r - m\theta ) + [ \xi b_0\sigma\im(\theta_s)/\sigma_0 ] \ r^{-3/2}\cos(\xi\ln r - m\theta)\ . ] it immediately follows that the momentum flux @xmath329 associated with the magnetic torque is given by @xmath426 where @xmath427 } \ , \ ] ] which is again independent of radius @xmath14 ; here , @xmath329 is inward for leading spiral density waves ( i.e. , @xmath223 ) and outward for trailing spiral density waves ( i.e. , @xmath224 ) . an example of illustration for @xmath190 , @xmath344 and @xmath11 is shown in panel ( b ) of fig . c2 . by comparing the three contributions to the total angular momentum flux transport , we reach the following conclusions . first , the contribution from the advective transport part tends to be more dominant over those from the magnetic torque and the gravity torque . secondly , for the @xmath177 branch for stationary fast mhd density waves that has a counterpart in the unmagnetized case , leading spiral density waves ( @xmath223 ) transport angular momentum inward and trailing spiral density waves ( @xmath224 ) transport angular momentum outward . thirdly , for the @xmath178 branch for stationary slow mhd density waves caused by the very presence of the azimuthal magnetic field , leading spiral density waves ( @xmath223 ) carry angular momentum outward and trailing spiral density waves ( @xmath224 ) carry angular momentum inward . note that all these results are only valid for stationary logarithmic spiral mhd density waves . there might be some reasons to rule out the @xmath178 branch in galactic contexts . for example , the @xmath178 branch is of lower @xmath87 which can not be sustained in real galactic discs . furthermore , for rotation curve parameter @xmath360 , the @xmath178 branch may be ruled out by inequality ( [ restrt ] ) . Abstract:

Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.

Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered . Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video . Paper: though well - studied for over fifty years , the spectral theory of hyperbolic surfaces still presents basic unresolved questions @xcite . for example , does there exist a noncompact , finite area hyperbolic surface whose laplacian has no nonconstant square - integrable eigenfunctions ? this question has been the subject of many investigations including @xcite , @xcite , @xcite , @xcite , @xcite , @xcite , and @xcite . the triangle @xmath0 defined by @xmath1 and @xmath2 . ] as a model problem , phillips and sarnak @xcite suggested studying the neumann eigenvalue problem on the domain @xmath3 pictured in figure [ trisect ] . in this paper , we prove the following : [ thm : main ] for all but at most countably many @xmath40,1[$ ] , the neumann laplacian on the geodesic triangle @xmath0 in the hyperbolic plane has no nonconstant ( square - integrable ) eigenfunction . the group @xmath5 of hyperbolic isometries generated by reflections in the geodesic arcs that bound @xmath0 is discrete if and only if @xmath6 for @xmath7 an integer . for example , if @xmath8 , then @xmath5 contains an index two subgroup that is naturally isomorphic to @xmath9 . it follows from the seminal work of a. selberg @xcite that if @xmath10 or @xmath11 , then the neumann laplacian has infinitely many nonconstant eigenfunctions . in particular , for some special @xmath12 , there do exist square - integrable solutions to the neumann problem . is an integer not equal to @xmath13 , or @xmath11 , phillips and sarnak asked whether the domain @xmath14 has no nonconstant neumann eigenfunctions @xcite . we should point out that since theorem [ thm : main ] allows for countably many exceptional @xmath12 , it does not directly answer their question . ] in @xcite , theorem [ thm : main ] was verified under an additional and as of yet unjustified assumption concerning the spectral multiplicities of the neumann laplacian acting on @xmath15 . the proof consisted of studying the singular perturbation problem associated with letting @xmath12 tend to @xmath16 . similar singular perturbations were studied in the context of degenerating hyperbolic surfaces @xcite and unitary characters over a fixed hyperbolic surface @xcite . in @xcite , @xcite , @xcite , and all prior work on this problem , it was necessary to make assumptions about the multiplicities of the spectrum of the limiting surface . the angles of a geodesic triangle in the hyperbolic plane determine the isometry class of the triangle . the angles of @xmath0 are @xmath17 . it is not difficult to extend theorem [ thm : main ] to triangles with angles @xmath18 ( see [ section : alltriangles ] ) . [ thm : gennocf ] the set of @xmath19 for which the hyperbolic triangle with angles @xmath20 admits a nonconstant neumann laplace eigenfunction has lebesgue measure zero and is contained in a countable union of nowhere dense sets . in other words , the generic hyperbolic triangle with one cusp has no non - constant neumann eigenvalue where ` generic ' can be taken in both a topological and a measurable sense . theorem [ thm : main ] gives the existence of a triple of angles @xmath18 for which there are no nonconstant neumann eigenfunctions . theorem [ thm : gennocf ] then results from applying a general and well - understood principle concerning analytic perturbations ( see , for example , @xcite ) . on the other hand , the proof of theorem [ thm : main ] is much more involved . in particular , the proof will rely upon a refined analysis of ` crossings ' of eigenvalue branches . to prove theorem 1.1 , we further develop the method of ` asymptotic separa- tion of variables ' that we introduced in [ hlrjdg11 ] to study generic simplicity of eigenvalues . this method facilitates the study of real - analytic eigenvalue branches in situations where a geometric domain degenerates onto a lower dimensional domain . there is a vast literature for instance , @xcite , @xcite , @xcite concerning perturbations involving degeneration onto lower dimensional domains , but most of these studies do not address analytic eigenvalue branches . in contrast , our results depend crucially on a study of real - analytic eigenbranches and their crossings . we now describe the content of each section . in [ section : prelim ] , we establish notation and recall basic features of the spectral theory of the laplacian acting on functions on a domain in the hyperbolic plane having one cusp . we describe the fourier decomposition associated to the cusp . the zeroth fourier mode is responsible for an essential spectrum of @xmath21 . following @xcite and @xcite , we will replace the dirichlet quadratic form @xmath22 with a modification @xmath23 obtained by ` truncating ' the zeroth fourier coefficient above @xmath24 . an eigenfunction @xmath25 of @xmath23 corresponds to an eigenfunction of @xmath26 if and only if the zeroth fourier coefficient of @xmath25 vanishes identically . we will call such an eigenfunction a _ cusp form_. , these are ` cusp forms ' in the sense of the theory of automorphic forms , but otherwise there is no discrete group , and hence they are not cusp forms in the traditional sense . in this paper we will always be considering ` even ' cusp forms , that is , eigenfunctions satisfying neumann conditions . ] the operator associated to @xmath23 has compact resolvent and hence discrete spectrum . this makes @xmath23 a much better candidate for the application of methods from spectral perturbation theory . in [ sec : generic ] , we recall and make precise some ideas familiar in the perturbational study of cusp form existence . we consider a real - analytic family , @xmath27 , of quadratic forms that have the same domain as @xmath23 . we say that a real - analytic family @xmath28 of eigenfunctions of @xmath29 is a _ cusp form eigenbranch _ if and only @xmath30 is a cusp form for each @xmath12 . we demonstrate a dichotomy : either the family @xmath27 has a real - analytic cusp form eigenbranch or the set of @xmath12 such that @xmath29 has a cusp form is countable . in [ section : alltriangles ] , we consider arbitrary real - analytic paths in the space of hyperbolic triangles with one cusp . we apply the results of [ sec : generic ] to deduce theorem [ thm : gennocf ] under the assumtption that there exists a triangle with no nonconstant neumann eigenfunction . the remainder of the paper is devoted to proving theorem [ thm : main ] which will give the existence of such a triangle . in [ section : expansion ] we specialize to the family @xmath0 . after renormalizing by a factor of @xmath31 , we find that for each @xmath25 , the function @xmath32 has a taylor expansion at @xmath33 . we compute the leading order terms of this expansion . in [ section : approx ] we show that the method of the asymptotic separation of variables introduced in @xcite may be used to analyse the family of quadratic forms @xmath34 . in particular , we define a reference quadratic form @xmath35 to which separation of variables applies and that is asymptotic to @xmath34 at ` first order ' . by separation of variables we mean that each eigenfunction of @xmath35 is of the form @xmath36 with @xmath37 and @xmath38 a solution to a renormalized form of the equation for a modified bessel function with imaginary parameter . we show that one may deduce a non - concentration estimate ( proposition [ prop : noncon ] ) . in [ section : branches ] we use the non - concentration estimate to derive information concerning the real - analytic eigenbranches @xmath39 of @xmath34 . first , we show that there exists an integer @xmath40 so that @xmath41 limits to @xmath42 as @xmath12 tends to zero . second , we find that if the spectral projection of @xmath30 onto the space @xmath43 spanned by functions of the form the @xmath44 is relatively small , then the derivative @xmath45 is of order @xmath46 . finally , we show that if @xmath47 is a cusp form eigenbranch , then @xmath41 can not limit to zero . in [ sec : proof ] we prove theorem [ thm : main ] . by the dichotomy of [ sec : generic ] , it suffices to show that real - analytic cusp form eigenbranches do not exist . we suppose to the contrary that the real - analytic family @xmath34 has a cusp form eigenbranch @xmath47 . by the results of [ section : branches ] , we have that @xmath41 limits to @xmath42 where @xmath48 . by improving the analysis of @xcite , we show that there exists an eigenbranch , @xmath49 , of @xmath35 that ` tracks ' @xmath41 at order @xmath12 in the sense that @xmath50 we will obtain a contradiction to this estimate by estimating @xmath51 from below . indeed , we show that when the norm of the projection @xmath52 of @xmath30 onto @xmath43 is relatively large with respect to @xmath53 , the function @xmath54 is of order @xmath55 , whereas when @xmath56 is relatively small , the function @xmath54 is of order @xmath57 . by controling the sizes of the sets where @xmath56 is respectively small and large relative to @xmath53 and by integrating , we will contradict ( [ trackingestimate ] ) . the key observation is the following : since @xmath41 limits to @xmath58 , it has to ` cross ' each of the eigenbranches of @xmath35 that limit to zero . we show that near such a crossing , the branch @xmath30 must ` interact ' with the functions in @xmath59 to such an extent that the projection onto @xmath43 can not be too large . the effect of each interaction is made precise by careful estimates of the off - diagonal terms in the quadratic form @xmath60 ( appendix a ) . by summing the effects of these interactions , we eventually prove that there exists @xmath61 so that @xmath62 thus contradicting ( [ trackingestimate ] ) . in this section , we describe some basic spectral theory of the neumann laplace operator acting on the square - integrable functions on domains in the hyperbolic plane with a cusp . we define the laplacian and associated dirichlet quadratic form , describe the fourier decomposition of eigenfunctions along horocycles , construct a modification of the dirichlet form whose eigenfunctions include the eigenfunctions ( cusp forms ) of the standard laplacian but whose spectrum is discrete . the half - plane @xmath63 equipped with the riemannian metric @xmath64 is the poincar - lobachevsky model for the @xmath65-dimensional hyperbolic space @xmath66 . the measure associated to the riemannian metric @xmath67 is given by integrating @xmath68 in the present context , a _ cusp of width @xmath69 and height @xmath70 _ is the subset @xmath71 \times [ y_0 , \infty[$ ] of the upper half plane . a domain @xmath72 is said to _ have one cusp _ if @xmath73 is the union of a cusp and a compact set . we will assume that the boundary of @xmath73 is the the union of finitely many geodesic arcs and that the interior of @xmath73 is connected . let @xmath74 denote the set of functions @xmath75 such that @xmath25 is the restriction to @xmath73 of a compactly supported smooth function defined on some neighbourhood of @xmath73 . the @xmath76-inner product of two functions @xmath25 and @xmath77 in @xmath74 is defined by @xmath78 abusing notation slightly , we will often write @xmath79 in place of @xmath80 . let @xmath81 denote the completion of @xmath74 with respect to the norm @xmath82 . to define the neumann laplacian we consider the bilinear form defined on @xmath74 by @xmath83 where @xmath84 satisfies @xmath85 for all vector fields @xmath86 and smooth functions @xmath87 . let @xmath88 denote the value of the quadratic form @xmath89 . one computes that @xmath90 let @xmath91 denote the completion of @xmath74 with respect to the norm @xmath92 . we will consider @xmath26 as a nonnegative symmetric bilinear form on @xmath93 with domain @xmath91 . as such it is densely defined and closed , and hence there exists a unique , densely defined , self - adjoint operator @xmath94 on @xmath93 such that for each @xmath95 and @xmath25 in the domain of @xmath94 we have @xmath96 the operator @xmath94 is called the _ neumann laplacian_. it can be shown that @xmath97 if and only if @xmath98 and @xmath99 where in the definition of @xmath26 the partial derivatives are to be taken in the distributional sense . it is well - known that @xmath94 has essential spectrum equal to @xmath100 . ( for example , see @xcite or @xcite ) . apart from this essential spectrum , @xmath94 may also have eigenvalues either smaller than @xmath101 or embedded in the continuous spectrum . from ( [ laplacian ] ) we see that @xmath25 is an eigenfunction of @xmath94 with eigenvalue @xmath102 if and only if @xmath97 and for each @xmath95 @xmath103 for each integer @xmath104 , define @xmath105 and define @xmath106 . the collection @xmath107 is an orthonormal basis for @xmath108)$ ] . hence , the functions @xmath109 provide an orthonormal basis of @xmath110)$ ] . for positive @xmath111 , let @xmath112 \times [ y_0 , \infty[$ ] be a cusp of width @xmath69 and height @xmath70 . for each @xmath25 in @xmath113 and almost every @xmath114 , the function @xmath115 belongs to @xmath110)$ ] . thus we can write @xmath116 where @xmath117 belongs to @xmath118 . we refer to @xmath119 as the @xmath120 fourier coefficient of @xmath25 . more generally , if @xmath73 is a domain with a cusp @xmath121 , then we define the @xmath120 fourier coefficient of a function @xmath122 to be the @xmath120 fourier coefficient restriction of @xmath77 to @xmath121 . parseval s theorem gives @xmath123 where @xmath124 denotes the characteristic function of a set @xmath86 . [ lem : ode ] if @xmath125 is a neumann eigenfunction of @xmath26 with eigenvalue @xmath102 , then for each @xmath126 and each @xmath127 , the fourier coefficient @xmath119 satisfies @xmath128 if @xmath77 is a smooth function on @xmath73 , then since @xmath25 is a neumann eigenfunction of @xmath26 , integration by parts gives @xmath129 by letting @xmath130 where @xmath131 is a smooth function with compact support in @xmath132y_0,\infty[$ ] , we find that @xmath133 it follows that @xmath119 satisfies ( [ eq : oden ] ) in the distributional sense in @xmath134 by elliptic regularity , @xmath119 is actually smooth and satisfies ( [ eq : oden ] ) in the strong sense . in particular , @xmath135 for some constants @xmath136 and @xmath137 with @xmath138 . if @xmath139 , then the real part of @xmath140 equals @xmath141 , and hence @xmath142 does not belong to @xmath118 unless both @xmath136 and @xmath137 equal zero . therefore , we have the following . [ coro : cuspform ] if @xmath25 is a neumann eigenfunction with eigenvalue @xmath143 , then the zeroth fourier coefficient @xmath142 vanishes identically on @xmath144 . in the classical spectral theory of a quotient of @xmath145 by a lattice in @xmath146 , a laplace eigenfunction @xmath25 with vanishing zeroth fourier coefficient in each cusp is called a _ ( weight zero ) maass cusp form_. even though most of the domains that we will consider are not fundamental domains for discrete groups of isometries , we will adapt this terminology . if @xmath25 is an eigenfunction for the neumann laplacian on a domain with a cusp , and @xmath147 , then we will call @xmath25 a _ cusp form_. traditionally , the neumann eigenfunctions for @xmath14 are called _ even cusp forms _ whereas the solutions to the dirichlet eigenvalue problem are called _ odd cusp forms_. we will not consider odd cusp forms in this paper . we wish to apply analytic perturbation theory to study the behavior of eigenfunctions of @xmath26 on @xmath0 as we vary @xmath12 . because the eigenvalues of @xmath26 might lie inside the essential spectrum , standard perturbation theory does not apply directly . following @xcite and @xcite , we will use a modification of @xmath26 first constructed by p. lax and r. phillips @xcite @xcite . in this section , we recall the construction , show that the eigenvalues of the modification are isolated , and relate the eigenfunctions of the modification to those of @xmath26 . for @xmath148 , let @xmath149 denote the set of @xmath150 such that for each @xmath151 we have @xmath152 . let @xmath153 denote the hilbert space completion of @xmath149 with respect to @xmath154 . let @xmath155 denote the restriction of @xmath156 to @xmath157 . let @xmath158 denote the hilbert space completion of @xmath149 with respect to the norm @xmath159 . the restriction , @xmath23 , of @xmath26 to @xmath158 is a closed , densely defined quadratic form on @xmath157 . a simple argument shows that @xmath160 and @xmath161 in the sequel it will be more convenient to replace @xmath162 by the following other set . [ def : wbet ] define @xmath163 to be the set of functions @xmath25 in @xmath164 such that * @xmath25 extends to a continuous function on the closure @xmath165 of @xmath166 * @xmath25 is smooth on @xmath167 observe that since @xmath168 , the closure of @xmath163 with respect to the norm @xmath159 is @xmath169 the latter assertion says that @xmath163 is a core of the quadratic form @xmath170 let @xmath171 denote the unique operator such that @xmath172 and that satisfies @xmath173 for each @xmath174 . [ lem : relation ] for each @xmath148 , the resolvent of @xmath171 is compact . hence , the spectrum of @xmath23 with respect to @xmath155 is discrete and each eigenspace is finite dimensional . using the fourier decomposition , one shows that for each @xmath175 , the set of @xmath176 such that @xmath177 and @xmath178 is compact in @xmath157 ( see lemma 8.7 @xcite ) . it follows that @xmath171 has compact resolvent . hence , by standard spectral theory , the spectrum is discrete and the eigenspaces are finite dimensional . [ def : cf ] we will say that an eigenfunction @xmath25 of @xmath23 with respect to @xmath155 is a _ cusp form _ if and only for each @xmath127 we have @xmath152 . [ lem : betacf ] the following assertions are equivalent : 1 . @xmath25 is a cusp form of @xmath26 with respect to @xmath156 . there exists @xmath148 such that @xmath25 is a cusp form of @xmath23 with respect to @xmath155 . 3 . for each @xmath148 , the function @xmath25 is a cusp form for @xmath23 with respect to @xmath155 . @xmath179 : if @xmath25 is an eigenfunction of @xmath26 with eigenvalue @xmath102 , then by lemma [ lem : ode ] the zeroth fourier coefficient @xmath142 satisfies the differential equation @xmath180 . since @xmath181 vanishes for @xmath182 , it must vanish for @xmath183 . @xmath184 : fix a smooth function @xmath185 such that @xmath186 for @xmath187 and @xmath188 for @xmath189 if @xmath152 for each @xmath182 , then @xmath190 and @xmath191 for each @xmath95 . thus , if @xmath192 , then @xmath193 . @xmath194 : follows from the equivalence of ( 1 ) and ( 2 ) . not every eigenfunction @xmath25 of @xmath23 is an eigenfunction of @xmath26 . for example , if @xmath195 and @xmath196 is an eisenstein series whose zeroth fourier coefficient vanishes at @xmath24 , then @xmath197 is an eigenfunction of @xmath23 . this function is not smooth across @xmath24 , but elliptic regularity implies that each eigenfunction of @xmath26 is smooth . let @xmath198\times [ y_0,\infty)$ ] and let @xmath199 in this section , we consider a fixed domain @xmath73 that contains the cusp @xmath200 and a real - analytic family @xmath27 of quadratic forms defined on @xmath201 that represents the cusp of width @xmath202 for @xmath182 and some real - analytic function @xmath203 ( see definition [ def : represent ] below ) . we prove the following dichotomy : either there exists a real - analytic eigenfunction branch consisting of ` cusp forms ' or the set of @xmath12 such that @xmath29 has a ` cusp form ' eigenfunction is countable . this fact is fundamental to the proofs of both theorem [ thm : main ] and theorem [ thm : gennocf ] . let @xmath198\times [ y_0 , \infty[$ ] and let @xmath204 . for any @xmath205 , we can define a transformation @xmath206 between @xmath207 and @xmath208 by asking that , for any @xmath209 the function @xmath210 is defined by @xmath211 since , in the sequel @xmath70 will be fixed , we will drop the index @xmath70 and denote by @xmath212 the cusp of width @xmath213 it is straighforward that @xmath206 is an isometry between @xmath207 and @xmath214 moreover @xmath206 also preserves @xmath164 in the sense that @xmath215 if and only if @xmath216 we may thus define @xmath217 the quadratic form obtained by pulling - back @xmath170 on @xmath212 using @xmath218 this quadratic form is then closed on the domain @xmath219 , and for each @xmath220 @xmath221 [ def : represent ] let @xmath73 be a domain that has @xmath200 as a cusp and @xmath222 let @xmath223 be a quadratic form closed over the domain @xmath224 we will say that @xmath223 represents the cusp of width @xmath69 for @xmath225 if , for any @xmath226 that is supported in @xmath227 we have @xmath228 for such a quadratic form , we will say that an eigenfunction @xmath25 is a cuspform if @xmath181 vanishes on @xmath229 the aim of this section is to prove that being a cuspform is a real - analytic condition . to make this statement precise we have to consider a family @xmath29 of quadratic forms that satisfies the following assumptions . [ ass : qt ] let @xmath230 and @xmath231 . for each @xmath232t_- , t_+[$ ] , let @xmath202 be a positive real - analytic function on @xmath233 let @xmath29 denote a nonnegative , closed quadratic form with domain @xmath234 that represents the cusp of width @xmath202 for @xmath235 lastly , we assume that the family @xmath27 is real - analytic of type ( a ) in the sense of @xcite . that is , for each @xmath236 , the map @xmath32 is real - analytic . a straightforward application of analytic perturbation theory@xcite vii gives the following . [ thm : eigenbasis_exist ] let @xmath27 satisfy the assumptions above [ ass : qt ] . then there exist a collection of real - analytic paths @xmath237 and a collection of real - analytic functions @xmath238 so that for each @xmath12 , the set @xmath239 is an orthonormal basis for @xmath153 , and for each @xmath240 , the function @xmath241 is an eigenfunction of @xmath29 with eigenvalue @xmath242 since the embedding from @xmath243 into @xmath244 is compact , for any @xmath12 the spectrum of @xmath29 consists only in eigenvalues . the proof is then similar to the proof of theorem 3.9 in @xcite viii.3.5 . for @xmath245 , define @xmath246 [ lem : nocf_deriv_criterion ] an eigenfunction @xmath25 of @xmath29 is a cusp form if and only if @xmath247 . @xmath248 is the left - sided derivative of @xmath142 at @xmath249 . since @xmath25 is an eigenfunction , @xmath245 and @xmath142 is a solution to a second order ordinary differential equation on @xmath250 $ ] with @xmath251 . thus , @xmath142 vanishes identically on @xmath250 $ ] if and only if @xmath247 . for real - analytic eigenbranches we have the following . [ lem : lanalytic ] let @xmath252 be an analytic eigenbranch of @xmath29 then the mapping @xmath253 is analytic on @xmath132t_-,t_+[.$ ] the zeroth mode @xmath254 of @xmath30 is a solution to the ode @xmath255 on @xmath256 $ ] with dirichlet boundary condition at @xmath257 denote by @xmath258 the unique solution to this ordinary differential equation that satisfies @xmath259 since the coefficients of the ordinary differential equation depend analytically on the parameter @xmath260 , the mapping @xmath261 is analytic ( with values in @xmath262)$ ] for instance ) . moreover , for each compact set @xmath263t_-,t_+[$ ] we can find @xmath264 such that , for each @xmath265 , @xmath266 . since @xmath30 is a multiple of @xmath267 , we then have @xmath268 analyticity on @xmath269 then follows from the analyticity of @xmath270 and @xmath271 and the choice of @xmath272 . we will say that real - analytic eigenfunction branch @xmath30 of @xmath29 is _ a cusp form eigenbranch _ if and only if for each @xmath273 , the eigenfunction @xmath30 is a cusp form ( see definition [ def : represent ] ) . using the real - analyticity proved in lemma [ lem : nocf_deriv_criterion ] we obtain the following [ coro : cf_discrete ] if @xmath30 is a real - analytic eigenfunction branch that is not a cusp form eigenbranch , then the set of @xmath273 such that @xmath30 is a cusp form is discrete . we now proceed to prove that if @xmath29 has no real - analytic cusp form eigenbranch then , for a generic @xmath12 , the form @xmath29 has no cusp form . as it turns out , we will actually first prove that the spectrum of @xmath29 is generically simple . let @xmath274 denote the set of @xmath273 such that @xmath29 has an eigenspace of dimension at least two . [ prop : mult ] if @xmath29 does not have a real - analytic cusp form eigenbranch , then @xmath274 is countable . let @xmath275 and @xmath276 be as in theorem [ thm : eigenbasis_exist ] . for each @xmath277 , let @xmath278 . since each eigenspace of @xmath29 is spanned by a finite collection of @xmath279 , the union @xmath280 equals @xmath274 . the function @xmath281 is analytic , and hence @xmath278 is either countable or equals @xmath282 . thus to prove the claim , it suffices to show that it is not possible for @xmath283 to equal @xmath282 . suppose that there exists @xmath284 and @xmath40 so that @xmath241 and @xmath285 are real - analytic eigenbranches so that @xmath286 for each @xmath287 . to prove the proposition , it suffices to produce a linear combination @xmath30 of @xmath241 and @xmath285 so that for each @xmath273 , the function @xmath30 is a real - analytic cusp form eikgenbranch . by hypothesis , neither @xmath241 nor @xmath285 are cusp form eigenbranches . by corollary [ coro : cf_discrete ] , the set @xmath288 of @xmath12 such that either @xmath241 or @xmath285 is a cusp form is discrete . for each @xmath289 , define @xmath290 its suffices to show that @xmath291 extends to a real - analytic function on @xmath282 . indeed , since @xmath292 is linear , we have @xmath293 for each @xmath289 . by corollary [ lem : lanalytic ] , the real - analytic extension would satisfy @xmath294 . the order of vanishing of @xmath295 ( resp . @xmath296 ) is finite at each @xmath297 . if the order of vanishing of @xmath298 at @xmath299 is at least the order of vanishing of @xmath300 at @xmath301 , then the ratio @xmath302 has a real - analytic extension near @xmath301 . hence , factorizing @xmath300 we obtain that @xmath303 have real - analytic extensions near @xmath301 . if the order of vanishing of @xmath298 at @xmath301 is at most the order of vanishing of @xmath300 at @xmath301 , then a similar argument applies by factorizing @xmath298 everywhere . thus , @xmath30 extends to a real - analytic cusp form eigenbranch . let @xmath304 denote the set of @xmath273 such that @xmath29 has at least one cusp form eigenfunction . [ alt : alt ] if @xmath29 has no real - analytic cusp form eigenbranch , then @xmath304 is countable . if there exists a cusp form eigenbranch , then @xmath305 . therefore , we have the following dichotomy : either the set @xmath304 countable or the family @xmath27 has a real - analytic cusp form eigenbranch . let @xmath306 be as in theorem [ thm : eigenbasis_exist ] . by corollary [ coro : cf_discrete ] , the zero set @xmath307 is countable . if each eigenspace @xmath102 of @xmath29 is one - dimensional , then there exists a unique @xmath284 such that @xmath102 equals the span of @xmath241 . thus , if @xmath12 does not belong to @xmath274 or to any @xmath308 , then @xmath12 does not belong to @xmath304 . in other words , @xmath309 . by proposition [ prop : mult ] , the set @xmath274 is countable , and hence so is @xmath304 . in this section we use the results of the previous section to explain how theorem [ thm : gennocf ] can be deduced from the existence of a triangle with a cusp that has no nonconstant neumann eigenfunctions . this fact may probably be considered as folklore and follows the general philosophy of using analyticity to prove generic spectral results ( see @xcite ) . the main task here is thus construct a real - analytic family of quadratic forms that is associated with each real - analytic path in the moduli space of triangles . first , we discuss the parametrization of the set of triangles with one cusp . the statement of theorem [ thm : gennocf ] makes use of the fact that hyperbolic triangles with one cusp are parametrized by the two nonzero vertex angles . but in order to prove theorem [ thm : gennocf ] , it will be more convenient to use an alternate set of parameters . for each geodesic triangle @xmath310 in the hyperbolic upper half plane @xmath66 having ( exactly ) one cusp , there exists a unique @xmath3110,1[$ ] and @xmath312 so that @xmath310 is isometric to the domain @xmath313 see figure [ trigeneric ] . the triangle @xmath314 in the upper half plane . ] in this way , the set of hyperbolic triangles may be identified with the euclidean triangle @xmath315 we say that a subset of the set of triangles has measure zero if and only if the corresponding subset of @xmath316 has measure zero . similarly , a subset of the set of triangles is said to be a real - analytic curve if and only if the corresponding subset of @xmath316 is a real - analytic curve . these notions are equivalent to those used in the statement of theorem [ thm : gennocf ] because the relationship between the angles @xmath19 and the parameters @xmath317 is real - analytic . indeed , we have @xmath318 and @xmath319 . see figure [ trigeneric ] . to prove theorem [ thm : gennocf ] , we will apply perturbation theory . the following fact makes this approach feasible . [ prop : allcuspform ] each nonconstant neumann eigenfunction on @xmath314 is a cusp form and hence an eigenfunction of the modified quadratic form @xmath23 . the eigenvalue of a nonconstant neumann eigenfunction on @xmath310 is at least 1/4 @xcite . thus , the claim follows from corollary [ coro : cuspform ] and lemma [ lem : relation ] . let @xmath320 denote the set of @xmath321 such that there exists @xmath322 so that the modified quadratic from @xmath23 has a cusp form . to prove theorem [ thm : gennocf ] it will suffice to show that @xmath320 has measure zero and is a countable collection of nowhere dense sets . to show that @xmath320 is non - generic , we will use analytic perturbation theory and proposition [ alt : alt ] . in order to use analytic perturbation theory we will have to normalize the hilbert space and the domains of the quadratic forms . to accomplish this , we let @xmath323 \times [ 1 , \infty[$ ] and for each @xmath317 we define a @xmath324 diffeomorphism @xmath325 such that onto @xmath200 . the mapping that we define here is more complicated because it must preserve the notion of zeroth fourier coefficient for all @xmath326 above some point . in particular , the vertical displacement of vertical lines should not depend on @xmath327 for large @xmath326 . in @xcite , we considered dirichlet boundary conditions , and in that context there is no need to truncate the zeroth fourier coefficient . ] 1 . the restriction of @xmath328 is the identity for @xmath329 . 2 . for each path @xmath330 , the family @xmath331 is a real - analytic path . to construct @xmath328 , we use the fact that the map @xmath332 defines a fibration of @xmath314 over @xmath333 $ ] and a fibration of @xmath200 over @xmath334 $ ] . we define @xmath328 by sending the fiber over @xmath335 onto the fiber over @xmath336 . [ lem : defnb ] for each @xmath3370,{\underline{\alpha}}[$ ] , there exists a unique cubic polynomial @xmath338 so that * @xmath339 , * @xmath340 . * @xmath341 , * @xmath342 the coefficients of @xmath338 are real analytic for @xmath3430,{\underline{\alpha}}[$ ] . moreover if @xmath344 then , for all @xmath345,$ ] and @xmath346 $ ] , we have @xmath347 . since @xmath348 satisfying the two conditions on @xmath349 is equivalent to the existence of some @xmath136 such that @xmath350 denote by @xmath351 the cubic polynomial defined by @xmath352 by integration , there exists some @xmath353 such that @xmath354 evaluating at @xmath355 and using the condition on @xmath356 we find @xmath357 observe that @xmath358 if @xmath359 and , under this condition , we can solve the last equation on @xmath338 to find @xmath360 we obtain @xmath361\\ & = \frac{1-{\alpha}}{2{\underline{\alpha } } } \left [ { \alpha}^2+{\underline{\alpha}}^2 - 2{\underline{\alpha}}({\alpha}+1)\right],\\ & = \frac{(1-{\alpha})\left [ { \alpha}^2 -2 { \underline{\alpha}}{\alpha}+ { \underline{\alpha}}^2 - 2{\underline{\alpha}}\right ] } { 2{\underline{\alpha } } } \end{split}\ ] ] it follows that we have a unique solution provided @xmath362 and @xmath363 and that the coefficients are real - analytic in @xmath364 we now check the last statement . for @xmath365 , we have @xmath366 so that the claim follows . for @xmath367 we observe that the numerator of @xmath136 is a cubic polynomial that has three roots at @xmath368 thus , if @xmath369 then @xmath16 is the smallest root . since this cubic polynomial is positive for large negative @xmath355 and the denominator also is positive , it follows that @xmath136 is positive for @xmath370 so @xmath371 is a concave function , and by construction @xmath372 and @xmath373 . the claim follows . we will use the notation @xmath374 as well as the notation @xmath375 define @xmath376 by @xmath377 where @xmath378 define @xmath379 by @xmath380 observe that the conditions on @xmath137 imply that @xmath381 and @xmath382 are continuous on @xmath314 so that @xmath328 is @xmath383 we will use this function @xmath328 to normalize the triangle @xmath384 this is made possible by the following lemma . [ lem : bprop ] suppose that @xmath385 for each @xmath386 then the map @xmath328 is a @xmath324 diffeomorphism from @xmath314 onto @xmath200 . + in particular , for each @xmath387 and each @xmath388 , the mapping @xmath328 is a @xmath324 diffeomorphism from @xmath314 onto @xmath389 it suffices to show that the map @xmath390 is a @xmath324 diffeomorphism from @xmath391 onto @xmath392 . by assumption @xmath393 for each @xmath327 . we have @xmath394 , @xmath395 and @xmath396 . since @xmath390 is the identity for @xmath397 , we find that @xmath390 is a @xmath324 diffeomorphism from @xmath391 onto @xmath398 $ ] . for each @xmath399 and each @xmath400 , we define @xmath401 and @xmath402 by @xmath403 we then have [ lem : phi_analytic ] for each @xmath404 , each of the following maps is analytic on @xmath401 : 1 . @xmath405 2 . @xmath406 3 . @xmath407 if , for each @xmath408 the assumption of lemma [ lem : bprop ] holds then the map @xmath409 is also analytic on @xmath402 . + moreover , each restriction extends analytically to an open neighbourhood . the coefficients of the cubic polynomial @xmath338 depend analytically on @xmath410 and hence @xmath411 is analytic . the map @xmath412 is analytic and hence it follows that map ( 1 ) is analytic . maps ( 2 ) and ( 3 ) are therefore analytic . since @xmath411 is analytic and @xmath413 for @xmath414 , the implicit function theorem ( theorem 2.1.2 in @xcite ) implies that there exists a function @xmath415 which is analytic and a solution to @xmath416 we then have @xmath417 and , since @xmath418 is analytic , the claim follows . in the rest of the section , @xmath387 will be fixed so that we can use lemmas [ lem : bprop ] and [ lem : phi_analytic ] . we use the family of diffeomorphisms @xmath328 to define a quadratic form @xmath29 with domain @xmath419 that is unitarily equivalent to @xmath23 on @xmath420 . define @xmath421 by @xmath422 where @xmath423 is the operator that returns the jacobian matrix of a map . [ lem : domain ] the isometry @xmath424 is a unitary isomorphism from @xmath425 onto @xmath426 and it maps @xmath234 onto @xmath427 . + on functions that are supported in @xmath428 , @xmath424 coincides with @xmath218 we have @xmath429 it follows that @xmath424 is a unitary isomorphism from @xmath425 onto @xmath426 . let @xmath430 since @xmath328 is a @xmath431 diffeomorphism and @xmath432 is continuous on @xmath314 and smooth away from @xmath24 , then @xmath433 is continuous and in @xmath434 . the jump formula implies that @xmath435 + since , for @xmath436 , @xmath437 , the last statement is a direct verification . define the quadratic form @xmath438 on @xmath439 by @xmath440 [ lem : cuspequivalence ] @xmath25 is a cusp form for @xmath438 if and only if @xmath441 is a cusp form for @xmath26 on @xmath314 . if @xmath442 , then @xmath443 . it follows that if @xmath442 , then @xmath152 if and only if @xmath444 . for @xmath445 , the function @xmath446 is a solution to a second order ordinary differential equation , and hence @xmath444 for @xmath447 if and only if @xmath444 for @xmath448 . it will be convenient to have the following alternate form for @xmath29 . [ prop : alternate ] we have @xmath449 where @xmath450 is defined by @xmath451 and @xmath452 is defined by @xmath453 moreover , @xmath438 represents the cusp of width @xmath69 for @xmath235 this is a straightforward calculation using the chain rule and the change of variables formula . let @xmath454t_-,t_+[$ ] and let @xmath330 be a real - analytic path . [ thm : analyticity ] the family quadratic forms @xmath455 is analytic of type ( a ) in the sense of @xcite . for each @xmath12 , the quadratic form @xmath456 is a closed form with domain @xmath457 . it suffices to show that for each @xmath236 , the function @xmath458 is real - analytic . by proposition [ prop : alternate ] , we have @xmath459 where @xmath460 if @xmath461 \times [ \underline{\alpha } , \infty[$ ] , then the matrix @xmath462 is given by @xmath463 and @xmath464 . thus , the second integral on the right of ( [ eq : splitintegral ] ) depends analytically on @xmath12 . it remains to consider the integral over @xmath334\times [ 1,\underline{\alpha}]$ ] . the integrand @xmath465 can be expanded into a finite sum of terms of the form @xmath466 where @xmath467 is a function that is obtained by multiplying @xmath468 or its derivatives and the entries of @xmath469 and @xmath69 is one of the @xmath470 functions obtained by making the product @xmath471 where both @xmath472 are either @xmath25 or one of its partial derivatives . by lemma [ lem : phi_analytic ] , the coordinates of @xmath328 and @xmath473 are analytic functions of @xmath317 . it follows that @xmath474 and @xmath475 are analytic ( in a neighborhood of @xmath476 \times [ 1 , \underline{\alpha}]$ ] ) . in all possible choices , the function @xmath467 then is analytic . the analyticity of @xmath458 follows from lemma [ lem : intanalytic ] below . [ lem : intanalytic ] if @xmath477 \times [ 1 , \underline{\alpha}]$ ] is analytic , then for each @xmath478 \times [ 1 , \underline{\alpha}])$ ] , the function @xmath479 is analytic on @xmath282 . there exists an open neighborhood @xmath480 of @xmath476 \times [ 1 , \underline{\alpha}]$ ] such that the map @xmath481 extends to a holomorphic function on @xmath482 . since @xmath334 \times [ 1,\underline{\alpha}]$ ] is compact , @xmath483 converges uniformly to @xmath484 as @xmath12 approaches @xmath140 . it follows that the ( complex ) @xmath12-derivative of the map in ( [ eq : intanalytic ] ) exists at each @xmath485 . given theorem [ thm : analyticity ] , we now explain why the generic triangle @xmath314 has no cusp forms provided that one triangle has none . if there exists a point @xmath486 such that @xmath26 on @xmath487 has no nonconstant eigenfunction , then @xmath320 has measure zero and is a countable union of nowhere dense sets . by proposition [ prop : allcuspform ] , the quadratic form @xmath23 on @xmath487 has no cusp form , and hence by lemma [ lem : cuspequivalence ] , the quadratic form @xmath488 has no cusp form . to show that @xmath320 has measure zero , we apply fubini s theorem in a fashion similar to @xcite : let @xmath489 and apply lemma [ alt : alt ] to find that the set @xmath137 of @xmath69 such that @xmath490 is countable . for each @xmath491 , let @xmath492 and apply lemma [ alt : alt ] to find that the intersection @xmath493 of the line @xmath494 with @xmath320 is countable . hence for each @xmath491 , the set @xmath493 has measure zero with respect to the linear measure @xmath495 . hence , the measure of @xmath320 equals the measure of @xmath496 . since @xmath137 is countable , the measure equals zero . for @xmath497 , let @xmath498 be the set of @xmath321 such that @xmath26 on @xmath499 has a cusp form with eigenvalue at most @xmath500 . using the continuity of @xmath501 and the continuity of linear functional @xmath292 , one can show that @xmath498 is a closed . thus , it suffices to show that @xmath498 is nowhere dense . given a point @xmath502 , let @xmath503 \rightarrow { { \mathcal m}}$ ] be a real - analytic path joining @xmath504 to @xmath317 . since @xmath23 on @xmath487 has no cusp forms , the family @xmath455 has no cusp form eigenfunction branch . it follows from lemma [ alt : alt ] , that for each open neighborhood @xmath482 of @xmath317 , there exists @xmath505 $ ] such that @xmath506 and @xmath507 has no cusp forms . hence @xmath498 is nowhere dense . in the remainder of this paper we consider the specific family of triangles @xmath508 defined in the introduction . in particular , we will study the spectral properties of @xmath509 for small @xmath12 . the family @xmath509 of quadratic forms does not converge as @xmath12 tends to zero nor do its real - analytic eigenbranches . but a simple renormalization will give convergence . fix @xmath322 and @xmath399 such that @xmath510 . let @xmath137 be the function defined in lemma [ lem : defnb ] . when @xmath355 tends to @xmath16 , the function @xmath511 converges to @xmath16 uniformly for @xmath512.$ ] thus , there exists @xmath513 such that if @xmath514 and @xmath515 then @xmath516 choose @xmath301 such that @xmath517 then , for each @xmath518 and each @xmath519 @xmath520 so that @xmath521 we may thus use lemmas [ lem : bprop ] and [ lem : phi_analytic ] . the methods and results of section [ subsec : analyticity ] then apply and we define the quadratic form @xmath509 as previously . for each @xmath522 , define the renormalized quadratic form by @xmath523 with domain @xmath234 . by theorem [ thm : analyticity ] , the family @xmath27 is real - analytic of type ( a ) for @xmath40,1[$ ] . in particular , the results of [ subsec : generic ] apply . to study the limiting properties of the family @xmath29 , we re - express @xmath29 in a more convenient form : for each @xmath324 function @xmath524 define @xmath525 recall that @xmath526 is the inverse of @xmath338 and set @xmath527 . define @xmath528 and @xmath529 where the subscript ( or first argument ) in each @xmath530 and @xmath137 is @xmath531 . when comparing @xmath532 and @xmath533 ( @xmath469 and @xmath534 ) we see that we only miss some powers of @xmath12 than eventually cancel in the computation leading to proposition [ prop : alternate ] . this shows that for each @xmath236 @xmath535 where @xmath536\times [ 1 , \underline{\alpha}]$ ] and @xmath537\times [ \underline{\alpha } , \infty]$ ] . by arguing as in the proof of theorem [ thm : analyticity ] , one can show that @xmath538 is analytic at @xmath33 . is not closed on the domain @xmath234 , the family @xmath29 is _ not _ analytic at @xmath33 in the sense of @xcite . ] we will now compute the first few terms in the taylor series in @xmath12 for @xmath539 and @xmath540 these functions are analytic on a neighbourhood of @xmath541 in particular , in the following , the expressions like @xmath542 are uniform with respect to @xmath543 and may be differentiated with respect to @xmath544 and @xmath545 . we first compute @xmath546 and @xmath547 since @xmath548 is analytic and @xmath549 , it follows from ( [ eq : fexp ] ) that @xmath550 moreover , using analyticity , this asymptotic expansion may be differentiated with respect to @xmath551 we thus obtain , @xmath552 substituting these into ( [ defn : rhotilde ] ) , and differentiating , we find that @xmath553 using ( [ eq : fexp ] ) , ( [ eq : fderivexp ] ) , ( [ exp : yalpha ] ) , and ( [ exp : yderivalpha ] ) we find that @xmath554 where @xmath282 is the identity matrix , @xmath542 is a matrix whose operator norm is bounded by a constant times @xmath31 as @xmath12 tends to zero , and @xmath555 is the polynomial @xmath556 to prove theorem [ thm : main ] we will need to know that @xmath557 . [ lem : p_positive ] @xmath558 . by construction we have @xmath559 by differentiating with respect to @xmath355 and setting @xmath365 we get @xmath560 since @xmath561 the claim follows . in this section we apply the method of asymptotic separation variables developed in @xcite to the family @xmath29 . using the small @xmath12 asymptotics derived in [ section : expansion ] , we approximate @xmath29 to first order with a family of quadratic forms @xmath35 for which separation of variables apply . we also derive a non - concentration estimate for eigenfunctions of @xmath29 . in this section and the following sections , we will use @xmath562 in place of @xmath563 as coordinates for @xmath564 \times [ 1 , \infty[$ ] and unless it is specified otherwise @xmath565 is the norm in @xmath566 we begin by using the expansions obtained in [ section : expansion ] to determine the forms used to approximate @xmath29 . in particular , by substituting the expansions ( [ exp : rho ] ) and ( [ exp : q ] ) into ( [ eq : qdefn ] ) we are led to define @xmath567 and @xmath568 where the operator @xmath569 is defined by ( [ eq : gradient ] ) , @xmath536 \times [ 1 , \underline{\alpha}]$ ] , and @xmath570 we wish to show that @xmath29 is asymptotic to @xmath35 at first order in the sense of @xcite . it will also be used to help derive a key estimate for crossing eigenbranches . however , although @xmath35 is a positive quadratic form , the bottom of its spectrum tends to @xmath571 so that it is more convenient to use the quadratic form @xmath572 that we now define to control quantities . [ def : tildea ] the quadratic form @xmath572 is defined on @xmath573 by @xmath574 the following proposition can be seen as the beginning of an asymptotic expansion for @xmath575 [ prop : q - a - tb ] there exists @xmath353 such that for each @xmath576 @xmath577 we have @xmath578 if @xmath579 , then @xmath580 is identically equal to @xmath16 and @xmath581 is identically equal to @xmath282 . hence , by subsituting ( [ eq : nablarhow ] ) into ( [ eq : qdefn ] ) , we find that @xmath582 is the sum of the following four terms @xmath583 in order to estimate these four terms , we use the asymptotic expansions of [ section : expansion ] . for example , by ( [ exp : q ] ) we have that ( [ leading ] ) is equal to @xmath584 since the operator norm of the matrix @xmath542 is bounded by a constant @xmath353 times @xmath31 , we can apply the cauchy - schwarz inequality to find that the norm of ( [ exp : q ] ) is bounded by @xmath585 . similar arguments show that there is a constant @xmath353 so that * ( [ mixed ] ) is bounded above by @xmath586 * ( [ mixed2 ] ) is bounded above by @xmath587 * ( [ uv ] ) is bounded above by @xmath588 the claim follows . we recall the fourier decomposition of section [ sec : fourier ] . since now @xmath589 we thus have , for each @xmath590 @xmath591 where the latter makes sense for almost every @xmath326 and defines an element of @xmath592 as above , let @xmath593 denote the set of functions @xmath594 such that @xmath77 is the restriction of a compactly supported , smooth function defined in a neighborhood of @xmath200 . if @xmath595 , then each @xmath119 is smooth , and a straightforward computation shows that is the operation defined by @xmath596 . ] @xmath597 we define @xmath598 to be the set of compactly supported , smooth functions defined on @xmath599 . for @xmath600 , each integer @xmath40 , and each @xmath601 , we define @xmath602 for @xmath603 in @xmath604 , the inner product is defined by @xmath605 let @xmath606 denote the subspace consisting of those functions whose support lies in @xmath607 $ ] . for each @xmath126 , the quadratic form @xmath608 extends to a closed , densely defined form on the completion of @xmath609 with respect to @xmath610 . for @xmath611 , we will restrict the domain of @xmath608 to be the completion of those smooth functions whose support lies in @xmath607 $ ] . if @xmath25 is an eigenfunction of @xmath35 with eigenvalue @xmath260 , then for each @xmath77 in the domain of @xmath608 , we have @xmath612 and hence @xmath119 is an eigenfunction of @xmath608 with eigenvalue @xmath260 with respect to @xmath613 . thus , each eigefunction @xmath25 of @xmath35 may be written uniquely as @xmath614 where the @xmath120 fourier coefficient @xmath119 is an eigenfunction of @xmath608 . moreover , the spectrum of @xmath35 with respect to @xmath615 is the union of the spectra of @xmath608 with respect to @xmath613 . in what follows we will often suppress the subscript @xmath326 from the notation . the next two lemmas identify the eigenfunctions of @xmath608 for each @xmath40 . we begin with the nonzero modes . [ lem : nonzero_fourier ] for each @xmath12 and @xmath40 and eigenvalue @xmath260 of @xmath608 with respect to @xmath613 , the associated eigenspace consists of functions of the form @xmath616 such that @xmath617 moreover , when @xmath12 varies , the spectrum is organized into eigenvalues branches @xmath618 each of these is a growing function of @xmath12 and @xmath619 integrate by parts as in the proof of lemma [ zerolemma ] , make the change of variables @xmath620 , and use the boundary conditions . the second part follows from theorem [ thm : eigenbasis_exist ] . the zero modes are given by the following lemma . [ zerolemma ] the spectrum of @xmath621 with respect to @xmath613 is the set @xmath622 the eigenspace associated to @xmath623 is spanned by the eigenvector @xmath624 suppose that @xmath77 is an eigenfunction , that is @xmath625 for all @xmath69 . this implies first that @xmath626 holds in the distributional sense . ellipticity then yield that @xmath77 is smooth . moreover , by integrating by parts against a smooth function that is identically equal to @xmath16 near @xmath627 , we also find that @xmath628 let @xmath140 be such that @xmath629 . then two linearly independent solutions are given by @xmath630 and @xmath631 if @xmath632 and by @xmath633 and @xmath634 if @xmath635 . the condition that @xmath636 is real and nonnegative implies either that @xmath637 with @xmath638 , that @xmath639 or that @xmath635 . if @xmath640 , then the boundary conditions @xmath641 and @xmath642 imply that the solutions take the form given in in ( [ zeroeigenvector ] ) with @xmath643 . if @xmath644 $ ] , then there are no solutions that satisfy the boundary conditions . as a consequence of the identification of the eigenfunctions we have the following poincar type inequality . [ lem : poincare ] for each @xmath645 and each @xmath220 we have @xmath646 we have @xmath647 lemmas [ lem : nonzero_fourier ] and [ zerolemma ] imply @xmath648 and @xmath649 for @xmath650 . in the sequel we will use different kind of projections associated either with the fourier decomposition @xmath651 or with the spectral decomposition of @xmath652 more precisely , for each @xmath653 define the orthogonal projection @xmath654 by @xmath655 and let @xmath656 denote the image of @xmath657 . for each @xmath658 , we define @xmath659 the projection onto @xmath660 . we also define @xmath661 to be the orthogonal projection onto the eigenspace of @xmath35 associated to the eigenvalue @xmath260 of @xmath35 . for a fixed interval @xmath282 , define the @xmath35-spectral projection in the energy interval @xmath282 to be @xmath662 for each eigenvalue @xmath260 of @xmath35 , the associated @xmath35-eigenspace @xmath663 is the orthogonal direct sum @xmath664 where @xmath665 is the @xmath260-eigenspace of @xmath666 and @xmath667 is the span of @xmath668 . it follows that @xmath669 more generally , for a quadratic form @xmath545 the notation @xmath670 will always denote the spectral projection onto the interval @xmath233 we prove that @xmath35 and @xmath29 are asymptotic at first order in the sense of @xcite . in the following , we let @xmath671 ( resp . @xmath672 ) denote the derivative of @xmath29 ( resp . @xmath35 ) in @xmath12 . [ prop : q - a_asymp ] there exists a constant @xmath353 and @xmath301 such that , for all @xmath673 and all @xmath674 @xmath675 one argues as in the proof of proposition [ prop : q - a - tb ] paying a little more attention to the terms ( [ mixed ] ) , ( [ mixed2 ] ) , and ( [ uv ] ) . for example , to estimate ( [ mixed ] ) , use the cauchy - schwarz inequality and ( [ exp : rho ] ) to obtain @xmath676 the cauchy - schwarz inequality and lemma [ zerolemma ] give @xmath677 by combining ( [ est : nabla_rho ] ) and ( [ est : v_nabla ] ) and using ( [ exp : rho ] ) we find that @xmath678 switching the roles of @xmath25 and @xmath77 , we obtain the same bound for the expression in ( [ mixed2 ] ) . similar methods apply to bound the other terms . the estimate for @xmath679 is obtained in a similar way . since @xmath29 is asymptotic to @xmath35 at first order and @xmath35 and @xmath672 are nonnegative quadratic forms , each real - analytic eigenvalue branch @xmath41 of @xmath29 converges to a finite limit @xmath680 as @xmath12 tends to zero ( theorem 3.4 of @xcite ) . for the dirichlet eigenvalue problem on @xmath0 , we showed in @xcite that each limit @xmath680 has the form @xmath42 where @xmath40 is an integer . the methods of @xcite can be applied to show that the same fact is true in the present context . in this section we highlight the necessary modifications . we also show that if the eigenvalue branch is associated to a cusp form , then @xmath40 must be positive . this latter fact will be used crucially in the proof of theorem [ thm : main ] . the proof of convergence depends crucially on the following ` non - concentration ' result proved for the dirichlet problem in @xcite . we will denote by @xmath681 the domain of the quadratic form @xmath682 and by @xmath683 the quadratic form defined for @xmath684 by @xmath685 [ prop : real_noncon](compare proposition 9.1 of @xcite ) let @xmath653 , let @xmath269 be a compact subset of @xmath132(\pi \ell)^2 , \infty[$ ] , and let @xmath686 . there exist positive constants @xmath301 and @xmath687 ( that only depend on @xmath688 and @xmath353 ) so that if @xmath689 , if @xmath518 , and if for each @xmath690 , the function @xmath691 satisfies @xmath692 then @xmath693 if @xmath694 this is proposition 9.1 of @xcite with @xmath695 and @xmath696 . if @xmath697 and we let @xmath698 , then ( [ nonconcentrate ] ) holds . in the language of semi - classical analysis , propostion [ prop : real_noncon ] asserts that a quasimode @xmath77 of order @xmath12 at energy @xmath102 does not concentrate at @xmath699 if @xmath700 . in 12 of @xcite , we used non - concentration to derive indirect estimates for @xmath701 . the following proposition and corollary make these estimates more transparent and simpler to apply . [ prop : noncon ] let @xmath653 and let @xmath702 ( \pi \ell)^2,\infty[$ ] be compact . for each @xmath703 , there exists @xmath704 and @xmath705 such that for each @xmath691 and @xmath518 @xmath706 where @xmath707 from ( [ defn : ak ] ) we find that @xmath708 and hence @xmath709 if the claim is not true , then for each @xmath704 , there exists a sequence @xmath710 tending to zero and sequences @xmath711 @xmath712 such that @xmath713 in particular , since @xmath714 , we have @xmath715 . it follows that for each @xmath716 @xmath717 we fix @xmath718 such that @xmath719+k \subset ( ( \ell \pi)^2 , \infty),$ ] and we set @xmath720}(\tilde{v}_n ) = p_{{\widetilde{a}_t^\ell}}^{[e_n+1-\delta , e_n+1+\delta]}(\tilde{v}_n).$ ] reasoning as in the proof of lemma 2.3 in @xcite we find that @xmath721 observe that the sequences @xmath722 and @xmath723 depend on the initial choice of @xmath724 but the preceding estimate gives a constant @xmath353 that is independent of @xmath724 such that @xmath725 this implies in particular @xmath726 so that , for @xmath727 large enough we have @xmath728 in equation ( [ eq : tvnisqm ] ) we replace the test function @xmath69 by @xmath729}(w)$ ] and use that the spectral projector is self - adjoint and commutes with @xmath730 we obtain that for each @xmath731 , @xmath732}(w ) \right)^{\frac{1}{2}}\\ & \leq c \cdot t_n \cdot \| v_n\| \|w\| , \end{split}\ ] ] where we have used that @xmath733 is controlling @xmath734 and that @xmath735}(w)\right ) \,\leq\ , ( \sup(k)+\delta)\|w\|^2\ ] ] by definition of a spectral projector . since @xmath736 and @xmath737 is a non - negative quadratic form , we also have @xmath738 equation ( [ eq : vnisqm ] ) implies that we may use proposition [ prop : real_noncon ] to find @xmath739 since ( [ eq : vnisqm ] ) also implies @xmath740 using ( [ eq : adot_express ] ) we find that @xmath741 on the other hand , the contradiction assumption implies that @xmath742 the implied constant @xmath353 does not depend on @xmath724 so if we take @xmath743 then choosing @xmath744 small enough yields the contradiction . this proposition yields an estimate for @xmath745 from below in terms of the projection @xmath746 [ coro : noncon ] let @xmath48 and let @xmath747 be a compact subset of @xmath132(\pi k)^2 , \infty[$ ] . for each @xmath748 , there exists @xmath749 @xmath705 such that if @xmath689 , @xmath750 , and @xmath751 , then @xmath752 where @xmath753 the functional @xmath754 is equivalent to the @xmath755-norm of @xmath756 where here @xmath757 is the operator such that @xmath758 for each @xmath759 . since @xmath672 is block diagonal with respect to the sum @xmath760 and @xmath761 , we have @xmath762 we may apply proposition [ prop : real_noncon ] with @xmath763 to each term on the right hand side to find that @xmath764 where @xmath687 is the minimum of the @xmath724 coming from proposition [ nonconcentrate ] . for each @xmath765 , and @xmath766 , we have @xmath767 and hence @xmath768 . we also have , @xmath769 , and the claim follows . the bounds proved in [ sec : noncon ] depend on a bound on @xmath770 . in this subsection , we show that if @xmath69 is an @xmath35-spectral projection of a @xmath29-eigenfunction in an interval containing the eigenvalue @xmath102 , then @xmath770 is of order @xmath12 . we start with a real - analytic eigenfunction branch @xmath30 for @xmath29 with associated real - analytic eigenvalue branch @xmath41 . we let @xmath771 denote the associated spectral projection . let @xmath680 denote the limit of @xmath41 as @xmath12 tends to zero . the following two lemmas express the fact that the projection @xmath772 is an order @xmath12 quasimode for @xmath35 at energy @xmath41 . first we have a lemma that is comparable to lemma 2.3 in @xcite . [ lem : u_w_close ] if @xmath282 is a compact interval whose interior contains @xmath680 , then there exist @xmath705 and @xmath353 such that if @xmath518 , then @xmath773 using the fact that @xmath30 is an eigenfunction of @xmath29 and that @xmath35 and @xmath29 are asymptotic at first order , for each @xmath774 @xmath775 observe that letting @xmath776 yields that @xmath777 moreover the former equation can be rewritten as @xmath778 where $ \tilde{e}_t:= e_t+1.$ we may now follow the proof of lemma 2.3 in \cite{hj10 } observing that $ p_{a_t}^i = p_{{\widetilde{a}_t}}^{i+\{1\}}.$ this yields a constant $ c$ such that \begin{equation * } \begin{split } a_t(u_t - w_t^i)\,+\,\|u_t - w_t^i\|^2\ , & \leq \ , c\cdot t^2 \cdot { \widetilde{a}_t}(u_t)\\ & \leq \frac{c\cdot t^2}{1-c\cdot t^2 } \|u_t\|^2,\\ & \leq c'\cdot t^2 \|u_t\|^2 . \end{split}\ ] ] the claim follows . observe that by orthogonality the preceding lemma also imples the following estimate that roughly expresses the fact that all the mass of @xmath30 is supported by @xmath779 @xmath780 [ lem : quasimode ] if @xmath282 is a compact interval whose interior contains @xmath680 , then there exist @xmath705 and @xmath353 such that if @xmath518 , then @xmath781 for each @xmath782 we have @xmath783 so that the cauchy - schwarz inequality and the preceding lemma imply @xmath784 we also have using cauchy - schwarz and the preceding lemma . @xmath785 we now start again from ( [ eq : afo ] ) . first in the bounding term , we have already seen that we could replace @xmath786 by @xmath787 thus from the triangle inequality , ( [ eq : afo ] ) and the two preceding estimates we obtain @xmath788 the claim follows using ( [ eq : normwequivnormu ] ) . lemma [ lem : quasimode ] has the following corollary that expresses , in the language of semiclassical analysis , that @xmath779 is an order @xmath12 quasimode . [ coro : wisqm ] if @xmath282 is a compact interval that contains @xmath680 there exists @xmath353 and @xmath705 such that , for @xmath518 and each @xmath789 , we have @xmath790 since @xmath791 is a spectral projector , we have @xmath792 and hence lemma [ lem : quasimode ] implies @xmath793 since @xmath794 , the claim follows . by combining lemma [ lem : quasimode ] with corollary [ coro : noncon ] we prove the following . [ thm : limitsq ] let @xmath47 be an eigenbranch of @xmath29 then there exists @xmath795 such that @xmath796 suppose to the contrary that @xmath680 is not of the form @xmath797 where @xmath40 is an integer . let @xmath798 . choose a compact interval @xmath799(n-1)^2\pi^2,n^2\pi^2[$ ] whose interior contains @xmath680 . let @xmath30 be a real - analytic eigenfunction branch of @xmath29 associated to @xmath41 . let @xmath800 be the projection of @xmath30 onto the modes of @xmath35 that have energy lying in @xmath282 . if @xmath801 , then each eigenvalue of @xmath666 is at least @xmath802 . ( this follows from lemma [ lem : lambda_asymp ] or simply the nonnegativity of @xmath672 . ) thus , since @xmath803 , equation ( [ eq : projection_relation ] ) implies that @xmath804 let @xmath353 be as in lemma [ lem : quasimode ] , and apply lemma [ coro : noncon ] with @xmath805 to obtain @xmath687 so that @xmath806 it follows that @xmath807 is not integrable . this contradicts theorem 4.2 of @xcite . the next proposition will be the starting point of the contradiction argument in the following sections . it says that a cusp form eigenbranch can not limit to @xmath571 . heuristically , the zeroth fourier coefficient of a cusp form vanishes identically whereas an eigenvalue branche that limit to @xmath571 must eventually live have nontrivial zeroth fourier mode . however , because we have made a nontrivial change of variable , this fact requires an argument . [ prop : cflimnot0 ] if @xmath41 is a real - analytic cusp form eigenvalue branch of @xmath29 , then the integer @xmath40 appearing in ( [ eq : elimit ] ) is positive . suppose to the contrary that @xmath808 . set @xmath809 $ ] and consider @xmath810 defined in ( [ defn : wti ] ) . if @xmath694 , the restriction of @xmath811 to @xmath656 is bounded below by @xmath812 , thus we have @xmath813 on the other hand , the projection of @xmath30 onto @xmath814 equals @xmath815 . let @xmath816 denote the projection of @xmath817 onto @xmath59 . since each @xmath656 is a direct sum of eigenspaces of @xmath811 , we have @xmath818 the quadratic form @xmath811 is nonnegative and the restriction of @xmath35 to @xmath814 is bounded below by @xmath819 . hence @xmath820 . by lemma [ lem : u_w_close ] we have @xmath821 therefore , @xmath822 , and hence @xmath823 for small @xmath12 . lemma [ lem : cuspequivalence ] implies that @xmath824 is a cusp form for @xmath26 . in particular , for each @xmath825 $ ] @xmath826 where @xmath827 and @xmath828 . inspection shows that there exists @xmath353 such that @xmath829\times[1,\beta]\right \ } \ , \leq \ , c \cdot t \ ] ] for small @xmath12 . therefore , using the cauchy - schwarz inequality we find that @xmath830 using the fundamental theorem of calculus and the cauchy - schwarz inequality we find that @xmath831 thus , since there exists @xmath832 so that @xmath833\times[1,\beta]\right \ } \leq c ' \cdot t\ ] ] for small @xmath12 , we have @xmath834 since @xmath35 and @xmath29 are asymptotic at first order @xmath835 for sufficiently small @xmath12 . by combining these estimates , we find that @xmath836 since @xmath837 we can combine ( [ eq : zero_zero ] ) , ( [ est : etaminus1 ] ) and ( [ est : gradient ] ) to find that @xmath838 squaring and integrating over @xmath825 $ ] , we find that @xmath839 without loss of generality , we have @xmath840 . therefore , if @xmath41 limits to zero , then ( [ est : zerosmall ] ) will contradict ( [ est : zerolarge ] ) for small @xmath12 . we can also use the nonconcentration of the spectral projection to give an @xmath841 lower bound on the first variation @xmath842 in the case that the projection onto the small modes is significant . [ prop : adotbound ] let @xmath282 be a compact interval whose interior contains @xmath680 and @xmath843 . for each @xmath844 , there exists @xmath704 and @xmath705 so that if @xmath845 and @xmath846 then @xmath847 using the cauchy - schwarz inequality and the nonnegativity of @xmath672 we have @xmath848 it follows from ( [ eq : defa_t ] ) that for all @xmath849 @xmath850 and hence @xmath851 . moreover , by combining this with lemma [ lem : u_w_close ] we find @xmath852 thus , from ( [ est : adotu_adotw ] ) we obtain @xmath853 hence by applying lemma [ lem : u_w_close ] we have @xmath854 for @xmath12 sufficiently small . as in the proof of theorem [ thm : limitsq ] , we have @xmath855 . since @xmath701 is non - negative and ` block - diagonal ' we have @xmath856 let @xmath353 be as in lemma [ lem : quasimode ] , and apply lemma [ coro : noncon ] with @xmath857 to obtain @xmath687 so that @xmath858 for @xmath12 sufficiently small . estimate ( [ eq : normwequivnormu ] ) implies that @xmath859 for @xmath12 small , and therefore by combining the above inequalities , we prove the claim . in contrast to proposition [ prop : adotbound ] , we have the following . [ edotupperestimate ] there exists @xmath705 and @xmath353 such that if @xmath845 , then @xmath860 it follows from ( [ eq : defa_t ] ) that for all @xmath849 @xmath850 from ( [ eq : q - a ] ) , there exists @xmath353 so that for sufficiently small @xmath12 @xmath861 and @xmath862 thus , if @xmath30 is the real - analytic eigenfunction branch of @xmath29 associated to @xmath41 , then @xmath863 by choosing @xmath301 sufficiently small , we obtain the claim . proposition [ alt : alt ] reduces the proof of theorem [ thm : main ] to the following . [ thm : nobranch ] the family @xmath27 does not have a real - analytic cusp form eigenbranch . the proof of theorem [ thm : nobranch ] will be by contradiction . we will assume that there exists a real - analytic cusp form eigenvalue branch , @xmath41 . by the results of [ section : branches ] , we have @xmath864 where @xmath40 is positive . we aim to contradict the positivity of @xmath40 . the proof of theorem [ thm : nobranch ] will rely on the estimates of solutions to ordinary differential equations made in appendix [ appendix : airyb ] . to make the estimates less tedious , we will choose @xmath249 to be sufficiently close to 1 , where ` sufficiently close ' will be determined by the integer @xmath40 that appears in ( [ eq : limitk ] ) . however , the construction of the quadratic form @xmath29 depends on @xmath249 . therefore , the integer @xmath40 that appears in ( [ eq : limitk ] ) depends a priori on @xmath249 . in order to avoid circularity of reasoning , we will prove the following . [ prop : choosebeta ] let @xmath41 be a real - analytic eigenvalue branch associated to a real - analytic cusp form eigenfunction branch of @xmath865 . for each @xmath866 , the family @xmath867 has a real - analytic cusp form eigenfunction branch with associated eigenvalue branch @xmath41 .. ] for each fixed @xmath12 , since @xmath41 corresponds to a cusp form , it belongs to the spectrum of @xmath868 for all @xmath869 ( see lemma [ lem : betacf]).by theorem [ thm : eigenbasis_exist ] , there exists a real - analytic eigenvalue branch @xmath870 of @xmath871 such that @xmath872 . since @xmath873 has only countably many real - analytic eigenvalue branches , there exists some branch @xmath870 such that the set of @xmath874 with @xmath875 has an accumulation point . thus , by real - analyticity , we have @xmath875 for all @xmath874 . if for each @xmath12 , the dimension of the eigenspace @xmath876 of @xmath877 associated to @xmath878 is greater than one , then one can argue as in the proof of proposition [ prop : mult ] to obtain a real - analytic cusp form eigenfunction branch of @xmath877 associated to @xmath41 . otherwise , by real - analyticity , for each @xmath12 in the complement of discrete set @xmath136 of @xmath12 we have @xmath879 . let @xmath880 be a real - analytic eigenfunction branch of @xmath877 associated to @xmath41 . let @xmath881 denote a real - analytic eigenfunction branch of @xmath882 associated to @xmath41 . for each @xmath12 , the pull - back of @xmath30 by the diffeomorphism @xmath883 is a cusp form of @xmath26 on @xmath0 . in turn , for each @xmath12 , the pull - back of @xmath884 by @xmath885 is a cusp form eigenfunction of @xmath877 . hence , if @xmath886 , then the eigenfunction @xmath887 is a cusp form for @xmath886 . thus , by corollary [ coro : cf_discrete ] , the branch @xmath880 is a real - analytic cusp form eigenbranch of @xmath877 . as a consequence of proposition [ prop : choosebeta ] , we may fix @xmath249 to satisfy is most probably not necessary but it will simplify the arguments in the appendix . in particular it implies that , on @xmath888 $ ] and for @xmath889 , the sturm - liouville equations associated with @xmath890 have no turning point . ] @xmath891 it follows that for each @xmath889 and @xmath892 $ ] we have @xmath893 as soon as @xmath12 is small enough . in what follows , we will drop @xmath249 from the notation for @xmath882 . in this section we show that there exists a real - analytic eigenvalue branch @xmath894 of @xmath608 such that @xmath895 is at most of order @xmath12 . in [ sec : relative ] , we will show to the contrary that @xmath895 is at least of order @xmath896 . this will provide the desired contradiction . [ tracking ] if @xmath41 is a cusp form eigenvalue branch with positive limit @xmath58 , then there exists @xmath705 , @xmath686 , and a real - analytic eigenvalue branch @xmath49 of @xmath608 so that for each @xmath518 , @xmath897~ = ~ \{\lambda^*_t\}. \ ] ] it suffices to show that there exist positive constants @xmath301 and @xmath353 so that the distance from @xmath41 to the spectrum of @xmath608 is at most @xmath898 for @xmath518 . indeed , if this were so , then for each @xmath12 we would have an eigenvalue @xmath894 of @xmath608 so that @xmath899 . suppose that there existed a sequence @xmath900 and eigenvalues @xmath901 of @xmath902 so that @xmath903 . then we would have @xmath904 this would contradict the ` super - separation ' of eigenvalues given in theorem 10.4 in @xcite . hence there exists @xmath905 such that if @xmath906 , then at most one eigenvalue @xmath894 of @xmath608 satisfies @xmath899 . since the eigenvalues of the family @xmath608 belong to real - analytic branches , the function @xmath907 would be real - analytic . we first proceed to prove that there exists a sequence @xmath744 going to @xmath571 such that @xmath41 is at a distance of order @xmath12 of the spectrum of @xmath908 let @xmath30 denote a real - analytic eigenfunction branch associated to @xmath41 . by corollary [ coro : wisqm ] and the fact that @xmath909 is an orthogonal projection that commutes with @xmath35 there exists constants @xmath910 and @xmath301 such that for each @xmath77 and @xmath911 then @xmath912 let @xmath137 denote the set of @xmath601 so that the distance from @xmath41 to spectrum of @xmath608 is at least @xmath913 , where @xmath910 is the constant that appears in ( [ quasimodetrack ] ) . by the remark above , we want to show that there exists @xmath914 so that @xmath9150,t[$ ] is empty . for each @xmath9160,s[$ ] , we apply a resolvent estimate to ( [ quasimodetrack ] ) and obtain @xmath917 . orthogonality then implies that for each @xmath9160,s[$ ] , there exists @xmath918 such that @xmath919 by applying corollary [ coro : noncon ] and using the fact that @xmath701 is both nonnegative and ` block - diagonal ' with respect to @xmath920 , we find that @xmath921 for all @xmath9220 , t_3[\ , \cap b$ ] . by theorem 4.2 in @xcite , the function @xmath923 is integrable over @xmath1320 , t_3[$ ] . thus , by ( [ adotbound ] ) , the function @xmath46 is integrable over @xmath9150,t_3[$ ] . it follows that there exists a sequence @xmath924 with @xmath900 . let @xmath925 be a real - analytic eigenbranch of @xmath902 with @xmath926 . suppose that there exists a sequence @xmath927 with @xmath928 . we claim that there exists another constant @xmath353 and another sequence @xmath929 with @xmath930 so that @xmath931 . to see this , first note that by taking subsequences if necessary , we may assume that @xmath932 for each @xmath727 . let @xmath933 $ ] be the connected component of @xmath934)$ ] that contains @xmath744 . the graph of @xmath925 must cross the lines @xmath935 , and hence @xmath936 this establishes the existence of the desired sequence @xmath937 . by lemma 4.3 in @xcite , the function @xmath938 is bounded . thus , since @xmath939 , we can apply ( [ adotbound ] ) to find a constant @xmath749 so that @xmath940 for all sufficiently large @xmath727 . hence , @xmath941 , and thus @xmath942 but this contradicts lemma [ lambdadot ] below . [ lambdadot ] let @xmath650 and let @xmath744 be a sequence converging to zero . for each @xmath943 , let @xmath925 be a real - analytic eigenbranch of the family @xmath608 . if @xmath944 , then @xmath945 lemma [ lem : lambda_asymp ] as stated does not directly apply since the eigenvalue branch @xmath925 depends on @xmath727 . by keeping track of the constants in the proof of lemma [ lem : lambda_asymp ] , one can produce a version that directly implies lemma [ lambdadot ] . we prefer to give a direct proof here . let @xmath946 be a unit norm eigenfunction of @xmath902 with eigenvalue @xmath947 . by the standard variational formula @xmath948 since @xmath946 is an eigenfunction of @xmath902 with eigenvalue @xmath947 , we have @xmath949 it suffices to show that the right hand side of ( [ variation ] ) tends to zero as @xmath727 tends to infinity . let @xmath703 . since @xmath947 tends to @xmath42 , there exists @xmath844 so that if @xmath950 , then @xmath951 and thus @xmath952 to estimate the remaining integral over @xmath953 , we will apply a standard convexity estimate from the theory of ordinary differential equations . if @xmath727 is sufficiently large , @xmath954 , and hence there exists @xmath955 so that if @xmath956 , then @xmath957 it follows that there exists @xmath301 so that if @xmath751 , then @xmath958 since @xmath959 for sufficiently large @xmath727 , we may combine ( [ deltaplus ] ) with ( [ delta ] ) to show that ( [ variation ] ) is less than the given @xmath960 for sufficiently large @xmath727 . in this subsection , we show that @xmath961 is smaller than @xmath962 for @xmath140 near a _ crossing time _ , a value of the parameter @xmath12 such that @xmath41 belongs to the spectrum of @xmath621 . then we show that there exists a sequence of crossing times @xmath744 and intervals of width @xmath963 about the crossing times on which @xmath56 is smaller than @xmath53 . the proof of the first result depends on the analysis contained in appendix [ appendix : airyb ] . [ prop : xings - kpart ] given @xmath964 , there exists @xmath955 and @xmath705 such that if @xmath518 and @xmath965 then @xmath966 let @xmath967 be an eigenfunction of @xmath621 with eigenvalue @xmath968 satisfying @xmath969 . we have @xmath970 and hence @xmath971 in appendix [ appendix : airyb ] , we prove that there exists @xmath972 so that @xmath973 hence by applying the cauchy - schwarz inequality to the left hand side of ( [ eq : brhs ] ) , we find that @xmath974 let @xmath975 , and use ( [ dist53 ] ) to find that @xmath976 the claim follows by choosing @xmath301 sufficiently small . [ prop : xings ] for all @xmath977 there exists @xmath978 such that if @xmath979 , @xmath980 , and @xmath981 $ ] , then @xmath982 let @xmath983 be the eigenvalue branch of @xmath621 such that @xmath984 . by lemma [ zerolemma ] , we have @xmath985 for some @xmath61 , and hence @xmath986 . using the fact that @xmath35 and @xmath29 are asymptotic and the fact that @xmath701 is non negative , there exists a constant @xmath353 such that @xmath987 for all sufficiently small @xmath12 . thus , for even smaller @xmath12 we obtain @xmath988 since @xmath989 , integration over @xmath990 $ ] and exponentiation gives @xmath991 if @xmath992 , then @xmath993 where the last inequality holds for @xmath994 . by combining this with ( [ est : ratio_eigen ] ) , one finds that for @xmath995 $ ] , we have @xmath996 using lemma [ edotupperestimate ] , and @xmath997 , we have that @xmath998 an argument similar to the one above gives that @xmath999 for @xmath1000 $ ] . since by assumption @xmath1001 , there exists @xmath1002 so that if @xmath1003 , then @xmath1004 . therefore , by ( [ est : lambda_first ] ) , we have that @xmath1005 is bounded above by @xmath1006 for @xmath1007 . in sum , if @xmath1008 and @xmath995 $ ] , then @xmath1009 the claim follows by chosing @xmath718 carefully . we wish to estimate from below the size of the set of @xmath12 for which ( [ dist53 ] ) holds true . this is accomplished by the following proposition . [ prop : seqxings ] let @xmath844 . there is a sequence @xmath744 of crossing times such that @xmath1010 and if @xmath1011 are large enough , then the intervals @xmath1012 $ ] and @xmath1013 $ ] are disjoint . by lemma [ lem : lambda_asymp ] , there exists , @xmath1014 so that @xmath1015 . it also follows from proposition [ tracking ] that there exists @xmath1016 so that @xmath1017 for sufficiently small @xmath12 . by lemma [ zerolemma ] , the eigenvalues of @xmath621 have the form @xmath1018 where @xmath1019 and @xmath1020 is the increasing sequence of positive solutions to the equation @xmath1021 . standard asymptotic analysis shows that @xmath1022 fix @xmath1023 for each @xmath1024 $ ] and each @xmath1025 , there exists a unique @xmath1026 so that @xmath1027 we drop the dependence in @xmath1028 from the notation for a moment . if we set @xmath1029 and @xmath1030 then ( [ eqn : imp_+ ] ) becomes @xmath1031 by the analytic implicit function theorem , for @xmath327 near @xmath571 , there exist a unique analytic function @xmath1032 so that @xmath1033 by inspecting of the first few coefficients in the taylor expansion of @xmath1034 , we find that @xmath1035 thus , since @xmath1036 , and @xmath1037 we find that @xmath1038 where @xmath1039 . choose @xmath703 so that if @xmath1040 , then @xmath1041 . define @xmath1042 . by applying the intermediate value theorem to @xmath1043 , there exists @xmath1044t_n^- , t_n^+[$ ] so that @xmath1045 . see figure [ intermediate ] . since @xmath1046 is increasing to infinity , the sequence @xmath744 is decreasing to zero . . [ intermediate ] ] moreover , since @xmath1047 @xmath1048 where @xmath1049 . from ( [ eqn : r_n_asymp ] ) we have @xmath1050 where @xmath1051 . by substituting this into ( [ eq : tn+_asymp ] ) and ( [ eq : tn_asymp ] ) we find that @xmath1052 and @xmath1053 the first claim follows . moreover , since @xmath1054 , we have @xmath1055 it follows that , for all sufficiently large @xmath727 , we have @xmath1056\subset [ t_n^-,t_n^+]$ ] . since the intervals @xmath1057\}$ ] are disjoint , the claim is proven . in this section we derive the desired contradiction . in particular , we prove the following . [ prop : dt ] if @xmath41 is a cusp form eigenvalue branch with a positive limit , then there exists @xmath705 and @xmath1058 so that if @xmath845 , then @xmath1059 the proof will consist of two types of lower estimates . the first depends on the fact that near each crossing the ` relative variation ' @xmath1060 is at least of order @xmath841 . the second shows that away from the crossings the relative variation is not too negative . define @xmath10610,t]~ \left|~ \left\| w_s^k \right\|~ \leq~ \rho \cdot \|u_s\| \right . \right\}.\ ] ] if @xmath964 , then it follows from proposition [ prop : adotbound ] that there exists @xmath749 so that for @xmath1062 we have @xmath1063 hence , since @xmath1064 , there exists @xmath1065 so that if @xmath1066 and @xmath964 , then @xmath1067 for each @xmath1062 . we will integrate this estimate near the crossings to obtain the following . [ lem : onk ] for each @xmath964 , there exists @xmath705 and @xmath1068 so that for each @xmath518 , we have @xmath1069 by ( [ eq : edotkappa ] ) the integrand is positive on @xmath1070 , it suffices to show the same estimate holds for a subset @xmath1071 of @xmath1070 . to define this subset , we first combine proposition [ prop : xings - kpart ] , proposition [ prop : xings ] , and proposition [ prop : seqxings ] to find @xmath844 , @xmath1072 , and a monotone sequence @xmath1073 so that for each @xmath727 @xmath1074 \ ] ] belongs to @xmath1075 , the intervals @xmath1076 and @xmath1077 are disjoint , and for each @xmath1078 @xmath1079 where @xmath1080 . the subset @xmath1071 will be defined as a union of @xmath1081 over sufficiently large @xmath727 . we have @xmath1082 and hence there exists @xmath1083 so that if @xmath1084 we have @xmath1085 thus , from ( [ t_n_bound ] ) we find that if @xmath1086 , then @xmath1087 since the intervals @xmath1088 are disjoint , by combining ( [ eq : edotkappa ] ) , ( [ eq : intoveri ] ) , and ( [ eq : sumn53 ] ) , we find that @xmath1089 where @xmath1090 and @xmath1091 let @xmath1092 . if @xmath845 , then @xmath1093 $ ] for some @xmath1086 . we have @xmath1094 and hence @xmath1095 and @xmath1096 . therefore , ( [ est : int_g ] ) implies the claim . to bound the relative variation on the complement of @xmath1070 , we will use the following . [ prop : fdotbetweenxings ] there exists @xmath353 and @xmath705 such that , if @xmath518 , then @xmath1097 by arguing as in ( [ est : e_dot_lower ] ) we have @xmath1098 let @xmath1099 denote the orthogonal projection of @xmath52 onto the eigenfunction branch of @xmath35 that corresponds to @xmath1100 from theorem [ tracking ] . let @xmath1101 . we have @xmath1102 , @xmath1103 and @xmath1104 where @xmath1105 is an eigenfunction of @xmath608 with eigenvalue @xmath1100 . using the cauchy - schwarz inequality and the nonnegativity of @xmath672 we have @xmath1106 since @xmath1107 is an eigenfunction , we have @xmath1108 . using ( [ defn : ak ] ) and the fact that @xmath1107 is an eigenfunction that is orthogonal to @xmath1109 , we find that @xmath1110 since @xmath1111 , we have @xmath1112 the large @xmath326 asymptotics of @xmath1113 and @xmath1114 can be analysed using the same methods used in appendix [ appendix : airyb ] for @xmath1115 . in particular , the estimate proven in lemma [ prop : expdecay ] holds with @xmath1116 estimated in lemma [ lem : restimate ] . in particular , for each @xmath1117 , there exists a constant @xmath353 so that for sufficiently small @xmath12 @xmath1118 and @xmath1119 if @xmath1120 , then @xmath1121 for sufficiently small @xmath12 . therefore , by splitting the domain of integration into @xmath1122 $ ] and @xmath1123 and using the cauchy - schwarz inequality , we find that @xmath1124 for sufficiently small @xmath12 . we claim that @xmath1125 . indeed , by applying lemma [ lem : quasimode ] with @xmath1126 , we have @xmath1127 for some constant @xmath353 . thus , since the eigenvalue @xmath1128 satisfies @xmath1129 we find that @xmath1130 by definition , @xmath1109 is a projection onto eigenspaces of @xmath608 whose associated eigenvalues are distinct from @xmath1128 . by lemma [ lem : lambda_asymp ] , there exists @xmath844 so that such eigenvalues differ from @xmath1128 by at least @xmath1131 . because of ( [ est : preresolv ] ) , we can thus apply a resolvent estimate ( e.g. lemma 2.1 @xcite ) to find that @xmath1132 by substituting ( [ est : resolvent_est ] ) into ( [ est : pre_resolvent ] ) and setting @xmath1133 , we find a constant @xmath832 so that @xmath1134 by combining this estimate with ( [ eq : at_ak_inner ] ) , ( [ est : adot ] ) , and ( [ eq : edot ] ) , we obtain a constant @xmath1135 so that @xmath1136 by orthogonality @xmath1137 , and hence by ( [ est : resolvent_est ] ) and lemma [ lem : lambda_asymp ] , we have a constant @xmath1138 so that @xmath1139 the desired result follows . [ coro : nottoonegative ] there exists @xmath832 such that for each @xmath11400,1[$ ] , there exists @xmath705 such that if @xmath1141 , then @xmath1142 \setminus k(t,\rho ) } \left(\dot{e}_s~ -~ \dot{\lambda}^*_s\right)~ ds~ \geq~ c ' \cdot \left(\rho^2- 1 \right ) \cdot t^{{\frac{2}{3}}}. \ ] ] by definition , if @xmath1143\setminus k(t,\rho)$ ] , then @xmath1144 and hence from lemma [ prop : fdotbetweenxings ] , we find that @xmath1145 by using lemma [ lem : lambda_asymp ] , we find @xmath832 and @xmath301 so that for @xmath518 @xmath1146 the claim follows from integration . finally , we use lemma [ lem : onk ] and corollary [ coro : nottoonegative ] to prove theorem [ prop : dt ] . this will complete the proof of the main theorem . apply lemma [ lem : onk ] with @xmath1147 . then apply corollary [ coro : nottoonegative ] with @xmath1148 such that @xmath1149 since @xmath1150 is positive on @xmath1151 , we find that @xmath1152 since @xmath1153 , we have the desired conclusion . in this appendix , we compute the asymptotics of each real - analytic eigenvalue branch of @xmath890 for each @xmath1154 . [ lem : lambda_asymp ] let @xmath1155 and let @xmath907 be a real - analytic eigenvalue branch of @xmath666 for @xmath601 . then @xmath1156 where @xmath1157 and @xmath1158 is a zero of the derivative of the airy function @xmath1159 defined in ( [ eq : airy_asymp ] ) . moreover , @xmath1160 to prove proposition ( [ lem : lambda_asymp ] ) , we will first transform the eigenvalue problem into an eigenvalue problem that is easier to analyse . if @xmath77 is an eigenfunction of @xmath666 with respect to @xmath1161 with eigenvalue @xmath260 , then for each @xmath1162 and @xmath601 , we have @xmath1163 where we have set @xmath1164 hence @xmath1165 by making the change of variable @xmath1166 , letting @xmath1167 and @xmath1168 , and dividing by @xmath1169 , we find that @xmath1170 where @xmath1171 and @xmath1172 this leads us to set @xmath1173 and define for each @xmath1174 the quadratic forms @xmath1175 and @xmath1176 define @xmath1177 and @xmath1178)$ ] ( i.e. the set of functions @xmath1179 such that the distributional derivative also is in @xmath76 ) . then for each @xmath1180 , the form @xmath1181 is a bounded quadratic form on @xmath1182 and @xmath1183 is a closed quadratic form on @xmath1182 with domain @xmath1184 . since @xmath1185 maps bijectively @xmath1186)$ ] onto @xmath1187)$ ] , the function @xmath1188 is an eigenfunction of @xmath1183 with respect to @xmath1181 with eigenvalue @xmath1189 . it follows from the perturbation theory of generalized eigenvalue problems ( see vii.6 in @xcite ) that the eigenvalues of @xmath1183 with respect to @xmath1181 can be organized into real - analytic eigenvalue branches for @xmath1180 . the domains of @xmath1183 and @xmath1181 change , and hence analytic perturbation theory can not be applied . ] since the generalized eigenvalue problem @xmath1190 corresponds to a sturm - liouville problem with neumann condition at @xmath1191 , the eigenspaces are 1-dimensional . hence , we may enumerate the real - analytic eigenvalue branches @xmath1192 so that for each @xmath1193 and @xmath1180 we have @xmath1194 [ lem : bounded_branches ] for each @xmath1195 , there exists @xmath1196 and @xmath353 so that if @xmath979 then @xmath1197 in particular , there exists @xmath811 so that for small @xmath1180 @xmath1198 moreover , @xmath1199 is a zero of the derivative of the airy function @xmath1159 . first , we show that each @xmath1200 is bounded . to this end , define @xmath1201 since @xmath1202 is bounded above by 2 , we have @xmath1203 for each @xmath1180 and @xmath1174 . note that for each @xmath1204 , we have @xmath1205 and hence @xmath1206 integration by parts shows that the eigenfunctions of @xmath1207 with respect to @xmath1208 are solutions to the sturm - liouville problem @xmath1209 standard convexity estimates on solutions to ordinary differential equations imply that each eigenfunction belongs to the domain @xmath1184 of @xmath1183 for each @xmath1180 . in particular , the sum of the first @xmath1195 eigenspaces of @xmath1207 with respect to @xmath1208 belongs to @xmath1184 . therefore , using ( [ est : btoa ] ) , the minimax principle , and ( [ order ] ) we find that @xmath1192 is bounded by the @xmath1210 eigenvalue of @xmath1207 with respect to @xmath1208 . in the remainder of the argument we drop the superscript @xmath1195 and focus on an individual real - analytic eigenfunction branch @xmath1211 with eigenvalue @xmath1212 . for @xmath1180 , we have @xmath1213 where @xmath1214 indicates differentiation with respect to @xmath140 . a computation gives that for each @xmath69 @xmath1215 and @xmath1216 let @xmath1211 be a real - analytic eigenfunction branch of @xmath1183 with respect to @xmath1181 associated to the real - analytic eigenvalue branch @xmath1212 . integration by parts gives @xmath1217 let @xmath1016 be the upper bound on @xmath1212 proven above . if @xmath1204 and @xmath1218 , then @xmath1219 and hence @xmath1220 for @xmath1204 . it follows that @xmath1221 for @xmath1222 . thus , since @xmath1223 is finite , we find that for @xmath1224 @xmath1225 integrating from @xmath1226 to @xmath1227 , we find a constant @xmath353 ( that depends on @xmath1226 ) such that , for @xmath1228 we have @xmath1229 from this we find constants @xmath353 such that that @xmath1230 a similar argument shows that @xmath1231 therefore , ( [ est : nu_dot ] ) holds , and via integration we find @xmath811 so that ( [ eq : nu_asymp ] ) holds true . continuity of solutions to ordinary differential equations with respect to coefficients applies to ( [ eq : a - n - ode ] ) with fixed initial conditions @xmath1232 and @xmath1233 . in particular , we have a solution @xmath1234 to @xmath1235 it follows that @xmath1236 is a solution to @xmath1237 . estimate ( [ a - n - convexity ] ) applies to @xmath1234 , and hence it follows from ( [ eq : airy_asymp ] ) that @xmath77 is a multiple of @xmath1159 . the function @xmath25 satisfies the neumann condition @xmath1238 and hence @xmath1239 as desired . if @xmath1240 is a real - analytic eigenfunction branch of of @xmath666 associated to the eigenvalue branch @xmath894 , then @xmath1241 is a real - analytic eigenfunction branch of @xmath1183 with eigenvalue branch @xmath1242 . lemma [ lem : bounded_branches ] implies that @xmath1243 by differentiating @xmath1244 , we find that @xmath1245 by lemma [ lem : bounded_branches ] , both @xmath1246 and @xmath1212 are bounded . therefore , @xmath1247 and hence @xmath1248 . let @xmath39 be a real - analytic eigenbranch of @xmath29 such that @xmath1249 for some positive integer @xmath40 . for a fixed constant @xmath686 , let @xmath1250.\ ] ] as in [ sec : nota ] , let @xmath202 denote the orthogonal projection of @xmath30 onto the sum of the eigenspaces of @xmath35 whose eigenvalues lie in @xmath282 . [ prop : blower ] let @xmath955 . there exists @xmath749 , @xmath1251 and @xmath705 such that , if @xmath518 and if @xmath1252 is an eigenfunction of @xmath621 with eigenvalue @xmath1253 satisfying @xmath1254 then @xmath1255 the quadratic form @xmath1257 is controlled by @xmath35 meaning that there exists a constant @xmath353 such that for @xmath1258 @xmath1259 thus , proposition [ lem : u_w_close ] and the fact that @xmath1260 imply that observe also that proposition [ lem : u_w_close ] also implies that @xmath1263 in the limit @xmath1264 so that we can freely replace @xmath53 by @xmath1265 and vice - versa in each ( multiplicative ) estimate . by the discussion [ subsec : separation ] and [ sec : nota ] , for each @xmath12 we can uniquely write @xmath1266 where each @xmath1267 is an eigenfunction of @xmath666 with eigenvalue @xmath1268 . set @xmath1269 and @xmath1270 by linearity @xmath1271 from ( [ eq : defb_t ] ) we have @xmath1272 where @xmath1273 $ ] and @xmath1274 is defined in ( [ defn : p ] ) . since @xmath1275 , and @xmath1276 , we find that @xmath1277 if @xmath1278 , then @xmath1279 , and so @xmath1280 . for @xmath1281 , apply lemma [ lem : bwellpsi ] below to find that @xmath1282 since @xmath1283 and @xmath1284 are orthogonal if @xmath1285 , we have @xmath1286 thus , by summing ( [ eq : vlower ] ) over @xmath1287 , we obtain @xmath1288 for @xmath1289 , we have @xmath1290 thus , from lemma [ lem : bwkpsi ] and lemma [ lem : p_positive ] , there exists @xmath704 so that @xmath1291 for some @xmath704 . the latter estimate , combined with ( [ eq : linearity ] ) , ( [ eq : sumvl ] ) , and the triangle inquality , yield the claim . multiply both sides of ( [ eq : rdefn ] ) by a smooth function with compact support @xmath1302 and integrate over @xmath1303 , then integrate by parts to obtain @xmath1304 observe that @xmath1305 so that by applying lemma [ coro : wisqm ] to the test function @xmath1306 , there exists @xmath705 and @xmath832 such that for @xmath518 , we have @xmath1307 recalling that the @xmath76-norm on the right hand side has the weight @xmath1308 this implies that @xmath1309 the claim follows since @xmath1310 on the interval over which we integrate . the strategy of the proof of lemma [ lem : bwellpsi ] is as follows . by ( [ eq : rdefn ] ) , the function @xmath1311 is a solution to the inhomogeneous equation @xmath1312 where @xmath1313 and @xmath1314 the function @xmath1315 is a solution to the homogeneous equation @xmath1316 where @xmath1317 . our choice of @xmath249 in ( [ eq : beta ] ) implies that @xmath1318 is bounded below by a constant @xmath1319 for all small @xmath12 , @xmath889 , and @xmath1320 . hence we can use wkb type estimates to find a basis @xmath1321 of solutions to the homogeneous equation ( [ eq : homoode ] ) . we will then use ` variation of parameters ' to express each solution to to ( [ eq : inhomoode ] ) in terms of this basis , and we use lemma [ lem : restimate ] to provide control of the inhomogeneous term @xmath1116 . finally , we will estimate the integral in ( [ eq : ellsmall ] ) using a riemann - lebesgue type estimate . for @xmath889 and @xmath1320 , we have @xmath1322 , and hence we can apply theorem 6.2.1 in @xcite , to obtain a basis @xmath1323 of solutions to the homogeneous equation ( [ eq : homoode ] ) that satisfy @xmath1324 and @xmath1325 where , for @xmath1320 and @xmath889 , the smooth functions @xmath1326 and @xmath1327 have @xmath1328 norm that is uniformly @xmath1329 . observe that @xmath1330 have @xmath1331)$ ] norms that are uniformly bounded above and away from @xmath1332 moreover , since @xmath1333 and @xmath1334 are highly oscillatory for small @xmath12 , an integration by parts argument shows that the @xmath1331)$ ] inner product @xmath1335 is @xmath1329 . it follows that there exists @xmath1336 such that if @xmath1337 , then @xmath1338 for all sufficiently small @xmath12 . here @xmath1339 denotes the @xmath1331)$ ] norm . in particular , for each @xmath765 and each @xmath12 , there exists @xmath1345 so that the function @xmath38 of ( [ eq : vt ] ) satisfies @xmath1346 the eigenfunction @xmath1252 of @xmath1347 satisfies ( [ eq : generic_inhomo ] ) with @xmath1348 , and hence there exists @xmath1349 so that @xmath1350 the integral in ( [ eq : ellsmall ] ) is equal to @xmath1351 by expanding the product of sums , one obtains a sum of @xmath1352 integrals . by substituting the expressions ( [ eq : wkbderivate ] ) and ( [ eq : wkb ] ) , integration by parts , and applying standard estimates , we find that each integral is @xmath1329 . for example , consider the terms of the form @xmath1353 since @xmath694 , an elementary computation shows that there exists @xmath844 so that if @xmath1354 $ ] and @xmath12 is sufficiently small , then @xmath1355 thus , we may integrate by parts to find a constant @xmath353 so that the integral in ( [ eq : aa ] ) is at most @xmath1356 . it follows that all the terms of this form are bounded above by from ( [ eq : wkb ] ) and ( [ eq : wkbderivate ] ) we find that there exists @xmath1360 so that if @xmath1361 , then @xmath1362 . from ( [ eq : wkb ] ) and ( [ eq : ftl - defn ] ) we find that for each @xmath765 @xmath1363}~ \left|v_{e_t,\mp}^{\ell}(y ) \right|~ \leq~ \frac{2}{\sqrt{\delta_1 } } \ ] ] for all sufficiently small @xmath12 . hence , using the cauchy - schwarz inequality and lemma [ lem : restimate ] we have , for all @xmath1364 $ ] , @xmath1365 for all sufficiently small @xmath12 . for the derivative of @xmath1366 , we have @xmath1367 applying cauchy - schwarz and lemma [ lem : restimate ] gives @xmath1368 finally , we apply integration by parts to ( [ eq : aa ] ) . the resulting terms that do not contain @xmath1369 have uniformly bounded @xmath1328 norm . the term that contains @xmath1369 can be bounded using ( [ eq : boundadotpm ] ) . it follows that all the term of this form are bounded by @xmath1370 the final step consists in bounding @xmath1371 by @xmath1372 to control the terms of eq . ( [ eq : type1 ] ) . using ( [ eq : basis_equivalence ] ) and ( [ eq : defv_var ] ) we have @xmath1373}\{|h_+(y)|+|h_-(y)|\}\ ] ] by orthogonality we have @xmath1374 and , using the bound on @xmath1375 we finally obtain @xmath1376 this finishes the proof . as in the previous subsection , the function @xmath1377 is a solution to the inhomogeneous equation ( [ eq : inhomoode ] ) with @xmath1313 and @xmath1116 defined by ( [ eq : rdefn ] ) . however , for @xmath1289 , the function @xmath1378 is negative for large @xmath326 . in fact , since @xmath41 decreases to @xmath42 , the function @xmath1379 changes sign nearer and nearer to @xmath627 . since the solution @xmath1377 belongs to @xmath1380 , we expect it to decay exponentially as soon as @xmath326 moves away from @xmath16 . for @xmath326 near 1 , we will approximate @xmath38 using airy functions . in this subsection we will make these approximations precise and use them to give a proof of lemma [ lem : bwkpsi ] by lemma [ zerolemma ] , @xmath1252 is a constant multiple of @xmath1381 defined in ( [ zeroeigenvector ] ) . because both sides of the estimate in lemma [ lem : bwkpsi ] are homogeneous functions of degree 1 in @xmath1252 , it suffices to assume that @xmath1382 . we have @xmath1388 where @xmath1389 @xmath1390 and @xmath1391 . in particular , for sufficiently small @xmath12 @xmath1392 thus , since @xmath1393 and @xmath1394 the triangle inequality applied to ( [ eq : psi_0_decomp ] ) implies that ( [ est : psi_0_sup ] ) holds for sufficiently small @xmath12 . by proposition [ tracking ] and lemma [ lem : lambda_asymp ] , there exists @xmath353 so that if @xmath12 is sufficiently small , then @xmath1402 hence , for @xmath1403 , one finds that @xmath1404 thus , since @xmath1405 , there exists @xmath905 such that if @xmath1406 then for all @xmath1407 we have @xmath1408 for each smooth function @xmath1409 with support in @xmath1321+t^{\alpha } , \infty[$ ] , define @xmath1410 extend @xmath1411 to a self - adjoint operator on @xmath1412 . it follows from ( [ eq : lowerbound ] ) that the spectrum of @xmath1411 lies in @xmath1413 . hence @xmath1411 is invertible and the operator norm of @xmath1414 is bounded above by @xmath1415 therefore @xmath1416 the function @xmath1417 is a solution to ( [ eq : inhomoode ] ) on @xmath1418 , and hence @xmath1419 is a solution to the homogeneous equation ( [ eq : homoode ] ) . it follows from ( [ eq : lowerbound ] ) that @xmath1420 if @xmath1421 . in particular , @xmath1422 is convex , moreover @xmath1422 is non - negative and in @xmath1423 since @xmath1424 and @xmath1425 this implies that @xmath1426 . indeed , since @xmath1422 is convex , @xmath1427 has a limit @xmath1428 in @xmath1429 if this limit is positive then it implies that @xmath1430 for large @xmath326 and this contradicts the fact that @xmath1431 is integrable . in particular , @xmath1427 is bounded so that by integrating ( [ est : w2convex ] ) we find that @xmath1432 the argument also shows that @xmath1427 is non positive for large @xmath326 so that @xmath1422 has a limit when @xmath1433 since @xmath1422 is integrable , this limit is @xmath1332 for each @xmath1434 the function @xmath1435 that is defined by @xmath1436 satisfies @xmath1437 with @xmath1438 and @xmath1439 . therefore , by comparison with ( [ est : w2convex ] ) , and using the maximum principle , we find that if @xmath1440 , then @xmath1441 . applying this to @xmath1442 we find that for each @xmath1443 @xmath1444 for small @xmath12 , the function @xmath1455 has a simple zero near @xmath627 . thus , to approximate solutions of @xmath1456 near @xmath627 we will use solutions to airy s differential equation @xmath1457 where @xmath1458 . we first describe the link to airy s equation . if we define @xmath1459 , then we have @xmath1460 where @xmath1461 . let @xmath532 be the smooth function that satisfies @xmath1462 by substituting the latter expression into ( [ eq : ode2 ] ) and by dividing by @xmath1463 , we find that @xmath1464 setting @xmath1465 we have @xmath1466 where @xmath1467 we have @xmath1472 , and hence by lemma [ lem : restimate ] , @xmath1473 let @xmath1474 be the tracking eigenvalue branch associated to @xmath1475 . the eigenvalue @xmath49 corresponding to @xmath1476 is in a @xmath1329 neighbourhood of @xmath1477 moreover , when @xmath12 tends to @xmath571 , proposition ( [ lem : lambda_asymp ] ) implies that @xmath894 is at a distance of order @xmath896 of the rest of the spectrum . using ( [ eq : lambda_asymp ] ) , ( [ eq : rdefn ] ) , lemma [ lem : restimate ] and a resolvent estimate , we have @xmath1478 , and hence @xmath1479 the tracking eigenfunction @xmath1476 satisfies ( [ eq : inhomoode ] ) with @xmath1348 . hence by proposition [ prop : expdecay ] , if @xmath1480 , then @xmath1481 observe that , by orthogonality , @xmath1482 , hence @xmath1483 since @xmath1484 ( because @xmath1470 ) , we may thus take @xmath1485 and the biggest term is then of order @xmath1486 . the claim follows . we first construct solutions to the associated homogeneous equation @xmath1489 using airy functions . in particular , it is well - known that there exists a basis @xmath1490 of solutions to @xmath1491 such that @xmath1492 and @xmath1493 one checks that @xmath1494 defines a basis of solutions to ( [ eq : homoairy ] ) . it follows from well - known identities that the wronskian of @xmath1495 is @xmath65 . hence the wronskian of @xmath1496 is @xmath1497 . therefore , by the method of variation of constants , for each @xmath1498 , the function @xmath1499 is a solution to ( [ eq : inhomoairy ] ) . [ lem : estwp ] for each compact set @xmath1500 , there exists @xmath353 such that , for each @xmath1498 , if @xmath1501 and @xmath1502 $ ] , then @xmath1503 and @xmath1504 where @xmath1505 denotes the @xmath76 norm of @xmath1506 over @xmath1507 $ ] . moreover , there exists @xmath1016 so that if @xmath1508$],then @xmath1509 and @xmath1510 using the cauchy - schwarz inequality , we have for @xmath1511 $ ] @xmath1512 and @xmath1513 thus , from ( [ eq : wparticular ] ) and the triangle inequality , we have @xmath1514 estimate ( [ est : wparticular ] ) then follows from lemma [ lem : wdt ] below . the proof is a straightforward consequence of the continuity and known asymptotics of @xmath1525 and @xmath1526 . from ( [ eq : airy_asymp ] ) and integration by parts we find that @xmath1527 as @xmath25 tends to @xmath1528 . thus there exists @xmath1529 so that if @xmath1530 , then @xmath1531 therefore , for @xmath1530 , @xmath1532 and , using ( [ eq : airy_deriv_asymp ] ) , @xmath1533 the expressions on the left hand sides of ( [ est : aplusaminus ] ) and ( [ est : aplusaminusderiv ] ) are continuous in @xmath25 , and hence are bounded by a constant @xmath353 for @xmath1534 where @xmath1535 . moreover , from ( [ est : aplusaminus ] ) and ( [ est : aplusaminusderiv ] ) we have @xmath1541 and @xmath1542 provided @xmath1543 . let @xmath1544 . if @xmath1545 , then @xmath1546 and @xmath1547 . the desired estimates in the @xmath1548/@xmath1549 case follow . the estimates in the @xmath1549/@xmath1548 case are proved in a similar fashion . the function @xmath1555 satisfies the inhomogeneous equation ( [ eq : inhomoairy ] ) with @xmath1556 , and the inhomogeneity @xmath1469 satisfies ( [ eq : boundaw ] ) . to estimate @xmath1555 and hence ( [ eq : small_x_integral ] ) we write @xmath1557 where @xmath1558 is the particular solution to ( [ eq : inhomoairy ] ) defined by ( [ eq : wparticular ] ) for @xmath1559 . the function @xmath1560 is a solution to the associated homogeneous equation . integration by parts gives @xmath1562 using lemmas [ lem : airyapprox ] and [ lem : estwp ] , one finds that there exists @xmath353 such that , for @xmath1563 $ ] @xmath1564 thus , using ( [ lem_psi_0_bound ] ) , we conclude that the first term on the right side of ( [ eq : wpt_integral ] ) is @xmath1565 . to bound the second term on the right side of ( [ eq : wpt_integral ] ) , we take @xmath1566 and estimate the integrals over @xmath1567 $ ] and @xmath1568 $ ] separately . observe that since @xmath1569 then @xmath1570 using lemmas [ lem : airyapprox ] and [ lem : estwp ] , we find @xmath353 so that for all sufficiently small @xmath12 @xmath1571 and @xmath1572 by combining these estimates and using ( [ eq : psi_zero_deriv ] ) , we find that @xmath1573 the claim will follow provided we can choose @xmath1574 and @xmath1575 so that each power of @xmath12 appearing on the righthand side is greater than @xmath1576 . this gives us a solution set which is the open triangle in @xmath1577 bounded by the lines @xmath1578 , @xmath1579 , and @xmath1580 . the two latter lines intersect for @xmath1581 the claim follows . as above we consider @xmath1586 and take some @xmath1587 using lemmas [ lem : airyapprox ] and [ lem : estwp ] , one finds that @xmath1588 } & \leq c \cdot t^{\frac{5{\alpha}}{2}-\frac{3{\widetilde{\alpha}}}{4}-\frac{1}{6 } } \|u_t\| \\ \| w_{p , t}\|_{[t^{{\widetilde{\alpha}}},3t^{\alpha } ] } & \leq c \cdot t^{2{\alpha}-\frac{{\widetilde{\alpha}}}{2}-\frac{2}{3 } } \|u_t\| . \end{split}\ ] ] the claim will follow provided we can find @xmath1589 and @xmath1590 such that @xmath1591 and @xmath1592 the solution set is here a quadrilateral whose projection on the @xmath355-axis is the interval @xmath132\frac{7}{33},{\frac{1}{3}}[.$ ] finally , we consider the integral corresponding to the homogeneous part @xmath1560 of @xmath1555 : @xmath1593 there exist constants @xmath1594 , @xmath1595 , depending on @xmath12 , such that @xmath1596 where @xmath1597 and @xmath1598 are as defined in ( [ eq : defn_w ] ) with the parameter @xmath140 and @xmath1599 defined in ( [ eq : s_z_s ] ) . [ lem : norms ] for all @xmath1400\frac{7}{33 } , \frac{1}{3}[,$ ] there exists @xmath1584 such that @xmath1602}~ = ~ o(t^\infty ) \cdot \| u_t\| \ ] ] where @xmath1603 is a function that is of order @xmath1604 for each @xmath727 , and @xmath1605}~ \geq~ { \frac{1}{2}}\cdot \left ( \|w_t^k\| -c\cdot t^\delta \|u_t\|\right ) . \ ] ] using the behavior of the norm of @xmath1606 we find that @xmath1607}~ = ~ o(t^\infty ) \cdot \|a_+w_+\|_{[2t^{\alpha},3t^{\alpha } ] } \ ] ] and @xmath1608}~ \leq~ c \cdot \|a_- w_-\|_{[0,2t^{\alpha}]}. \ ] ] we thus have @xmath1609 } & = & o(t^\infty ) \cdot \|a_+w_+\|_{[2t^{\alpha},3t^{\alpha}]}\\ & \leq & o(t^\infty ) \cdot \left ( \|w\|_{[2t^{\alpha},3t^{\alpha}]}\,+\ , \|a_- w_-\|_{[2t^{\alpha},3t^{\alpha}]}\,+\,\|w_{p , t}\|_{[2t^{\alpha},3t^{\alpha}]}\right ) \\ & \leq & o(t^\infty ) \cdot \left ( \|u_t\| \,+\,\|w_-\|_{[0,2t^{\alpha } ] } \,+\ , t^\delta \|u_t\|\right ) \\ & \leq & o(t^\infty ) \cdot \left ( \|u_t\| \,+\ , \|w\|_{[0,2t^{\alpha}]}\,+\ , \|a_+w_+\|_{[0,2t^{\alpha}]}\,+\,\|w_{p , t}\|_{[0,2t^{\alpha}]}\right ) \\ & \leq & o(t^\infty)\left ( \|a_+w_+\|_{[0,2t^{\alpha}]}\,+\,\|u_t\|\right ) . \ ] ] estimate ( [ est : a+w+ ] ) then follows by absorbing the norm of @xmath1610 into the left hand side . to prove estimate ( [ est : a - w- ] ) , we first observe that by using the triangle inequality we find that @xmath1611 } \leq \|w_{p , t}\|_{[0,2t^{\alpha } ] } \,+\,\|a_- w_-\|_{[0,2t^{\alpha}]}\,+\,\|a_+w_+\|_{[0,2t^{\alpha}]}.\ ] ] the first term on the righta hand side is @xmath1612 and the last one is @xmath1613 so that we obtain @xmath1614 } \geq \left ( \|w\|_{[0,2t^{\alpha } ] } - o(t^\delta ) \|u_t\|\right ) .\ ] ] the claim then follows by observing that corollary [ coro : normlocal ] implies that @xmath1615 } \geq { \frac{1}{2}}\left ( \|w_t^k\| - o(t^{1-{\alpha } } ) \|u_t\|\right).\ ] ] from ( [ eq : psi_prime ] ) , we have @xmath1617 thus , the integral we want to estimate can be written as @xmath1618 where we have set @xmath1619 denote by @xmath1620 the integral @xmath1621 integration by parts shows that @xmath1622 where we have set @xmath1623 since @xmath1624 and @xmath140 is of order @xmath12 , and since @xmath1159 is rapidly decreasing , the boundary term at @xmath1625 is @xmath1626 observe that we have a global @xmath1627 prefactor in front of the integral term . thus , when the @xmath1628 is applied to @xmath1629 , we gain @xmath1630 , that is , something of order @xmath1631 when @xmath1628 hits the airy function , we lose a @xmath1632 so that the global prefactor is of order @xmath1633 which is @xmath1634 . summarizing , integrating by parts gains at least a prefactor @xmath1635 by repeated integration by parts we thus observe that we can write , for each @xmath500 @xmath1636 where the @xmath1637 are some constants and the remainder term @xmath1638 can be written @xmath1639 for some smooth functions @xmath1640 if we fix some order @xmath1641 then , using that @xmath1159 and all its derivatives are rapidly decreasing we can find @xmath500 such that the remainder @xmath1638 is @xmath1642 this tells us that @xmath1620 admits a complete asymptotic expansion of the form @xmath1643 from the first integration by parts we see that @xmath1644 and the second term is then of order @xmath1635 the claim follows by taking the imaginary part . let @xmath1158 be the zero of @xmath1159 that comes from lemma [ lem : nonzero ] . since @xmath1159 is a nontrivial solution to a second order differential equation , @xmath1159 can not vanish at a zero of the derivative @xmath1649 . hence , for sufficiently for small @xmath12 , we have @xmath1652 . by arguing as in the proof of lemmas [ lem : nonzero ] and [ lem : wdt ] and using @xmath1653 , we find @xmath1654 so that @xmath1655 where @xmath1656 and @xmath12 is sufficiently small . in particular , @xmath1657 hence the claim follows from lemma [ w- ] . c. m. judge . _ small eigenvalues and maximal laminations on complete surfaces of negative curvature . _ in the tradition of ahlfors - bers . iv , 93 - 105 , contemp . , 432 , amer . , providence , ri , 2007 . Abstract:

Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.

Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered . Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video . Paper: photoionization models for chemically homogeneous gaseous nebulae of constant density predict an almost constant temperature ; consequently , observers often assume a constant temperature to determine chemical abundances . the spatial temperature inhomogeneities in regions are usually characterized by @xmath1 the mean square temperature variation in three dimensions . recent reviews on the temperature structure of gaseous nebulae are those by peimbert ( 1995 , 2002 ) , esteban ( 2002 ) , stasiska ( 2002 ) , liu ( 2002 ) , torres - peimbert & peimbert ( 2003 ) . from uniform - density chemically - homogeneous photoionization models it has been found that @xmath1 is in the 0.002 to 0.025 range , for objects with solar or subsolar chemical abundances , with typical values around 0.005 ( e.g. , gruenwald & viegas 1992 , garnett 1992 ) . baldwin et al . ( 1991 , henceforth b91 ) produced a photoionization model for the orion nebula , in which grains and gas are well mixed , that included photoelectric heating and cooling of the gas by grain ionization and grain collisions respectively ; for this model peimbert , storey , & torres - peimbert ( 1993 ) found that @xmath1 = 0.004 . alternatively from observations of ngc 346 in the smc ( peimbert , peimbert , & ruiz 2000 ) , 30 doradus ( peimbert 2003 ) , and the orion nebula ( peimbert et al . 1993 , esteban et al . 1998 , henceforth epte98 ) it has been found that @xmath1 is in the 0.02 to 0.04 range . the @xmath1values were derived by combining the temperature derived from the ratio of the @xmath3 4363 , 5007 lines [ @xmath4 with the temperature derived from the ratio of the balmer continuum to @xmath5 [ @xmath6 and by combining @xmath7 with the temperatures derived from the ratio of @xmath8 5007 to the recombination lines of multiplet 1 of o ii and the ratio of the of @xmath3 1906 , 1909 [ c iii ] lines to the @xmath8 4267 c ii recombination line . the differences between the observed @xmath1 values and those predicted by models have two profound implications for the study of ionized gaseous nebulae : they significantly affect the derived abundances and they imply the presence of one or several physical mechanisms not considered by the models . to study this problem further we decided to obtain an independent measurement of @xmath1 based on over a million temperatures determined across the face of the orion nebula . the subarcsecond resolution of the hst makes it ideal for this purpose . each of these temperatures represents an average along a given line of sight . since the columnar temperatures already represent an average temperature it is not possible to obtain directly from them the full @xmath1 value . instead it is possible to obtain the mean square temperature variation across the plane of the sky and from this value it is possible to estimate @xmath1 . in 2 we discuss the observations . in 3 and 4 we present the method for deriving the columnar temperature ( @xmath9 ) image together with its analysis . in 5 we formally define the columnar temperature , and the mean square temperature variation measured in the plane of the sky ( @xmath10 ) , then determine @xmath10 from the data . we then estimate @xmath1 based on @xmath10 and additional data from the @xmath9 image and temperatures . in 6 we compare our results with those of previous work . a new model for the structure of the nebula near the ionization front is presented in 7 . finally , the conclusions are presented in the intent of this observational program was to establish accurate 4363 and 5007 line ratios across the orion nebula using the wfpc2 camera ( holtzman et al . 1995 ) of the hubble space telescope ( hst ) and its narrow - band interference filters . this required imaging the nebula in the filters intended to isolate these lines ( f437n and f502n , respectively ) . since the extinction varies at small scales across the face of the nebula ( odell & yusef - zadeh 2000 ) , the magnitude of the extinction was determined on the same size scale as the line observations . this required determination of the h@xmath11 and h@xmath12 line ratios , which demanded observations with the f656n and f487n filters . since the former filter allows some emission from the nearby doublet to contaminate the h@xmath11 signal , it was also necessary to observe with the f658n filter , which is dominated by the 6583 line . there was the possibility of the h@xmath13 line contaminating the f437n signal . the anticipation was that this could be handled by scaling from the h@xmath12 observations in f487n . each emission line filter also passes the nebular continuum radiation . in the case of the emission line signal being very strong as compared with the underlying continuum it is sufficient to measure the visual continuum with the f547 m filter and extrapolate to the wavelength of the emission line filter ( odell & yusef - zadeh 2000 , odell 1998a ) . however , the continuum of the orion nebula is quite strong ( odell & hubbard 1965 , b91 ) because the large optical depth of dust particles lying just beyond the main ionization front ( mif ) back - scatter a significant fraction of the visual starlight reaching it . this back - scatter produces a continuum much stronger than that arising from atomic processes . the observations most sensitive to continuum contamination are those of the intrinsically weak 4363 line . fortunately , the f469n filter provided a good measure of the strength of the local continuum because it is free of strong emission lines when used to observe a low ionization object like the orion nebula . it is known that the he ii 4686 line ( which the f469n filter was designed to isolate in high ionization objects ) is undetected in the orion nebula even in spectroscopic studies reaching nearly 10@xmath14 the intensity of h@xmath12 ( b91 , epte98 ) . combining the f547 m and f469n observations allowed a linear extrapolation or interpolation of the wavelength dependence of the continuum flux to the wavelength of each filter . the filters employed and their pre - launch characteristics ( wfpc2 instrument handbook , version 6.1 available at http://www.stsci.edu ) are summarized in table 1 . this table also gives the wfpc2+hst system throughput as recently determined in orbit . because of the host of filters that had to be used and the length of the observing times necessary for producing an adequate signal in the fainter lines , only one field of view was covered . this was selected to include regions that had been spectroscopically studied recently using high dynamic range detectors ( b91 and epte98 ) , in order to allow a precise calibration of the filters , and to avoid the presence of the bright trapezium stars . as will be noted in 3.3 , the brightest trapezium star ( @xmath0 ori c ) was so close ( 7 ) to the ccd1 detector that low - level scattered light problems affected the long exposure images with that detector , rendering them useless for this program . the image is shown in figure 1 . the four ccd detectors of the wfpc2 are numbered counter - clockwise , with the high - angular resolution , but smaller field of view , ccd being designated as ccd1 . all exposures were made with exactly the same pointing on 2002 january 21 , 22 , and 26 and at the same gain ( electrons / adu ) values . multiple exposures of the same duration were made with each filter in order to allow correction for cosmic ray induced events on the detectors . the individual exposure times and number of exposures were : f437n(1100 s , 6x ) , f469n(1100 s , 6x ) , f487n(350 s , 3x ) , f502n(160 s , 3x ) , f547m(230 s , 3x ) , f656n(140 s , 2x ) , f658n(200 , 2x ) . all images were `` on - the - fly '' calibrated by the space telescope science institute ( stsci ) and then processed using their stsdas and the national optical astronomy observatories iraf tasks . the final product of the routine processing was a combined image such as shown in figure 1 . a considerable number of steps were necessary to convert the photometric observations with wfpc2 into 4363 and 5007 line ratios and from these line ratios into values . in this section we first describe the method of calibration of the filter properties and other components of the photometric system and their application to obtaining line ratios . we then describe the method of correcting for interstellar reddening . finally , we derive the pixel by pixel values of and estimate the statistical noise of the values . the method of calibration adopted was identical to that employed by odell & doi ( 1999 , henceforth od99 ) . however , in the present case we are only interested in the relative line fluxes , so that their equations for an absolute calibration can be simplified . the reader interested in absolute calibrations should refer to od99 , but note that an editing error occurs in their equation ( 5 ) . the term that reads @xmath15 should read @xmath16 , this error does not affect any of the numerical results in that paper . the basic approach is that one uses the wfpc2 observations of spectroscopically well studied regions to determine the calibration constants , which can then be applied to all the pixels of the image since the filter profile and system sensitivity does not vary across the image ( after the appropriate flat - field corrections have been applied ) . the most important calibration constants are determined directly from the observations of the reference regions and only the secondary constants draw on filter characteristics that were last determined before launch of the wfpcs . since the filter and detector characteristics can change with time , this method of calibration permits accurate determination of the most important characteristics . our method of deriving relative calibrations relates n@xmath17 ( the recorded number of adu counts per unit time ) to the characteristics of the source and the filter and camera system through the equation @xmath18 where we have used the following nomenclature : @xmath19=system throughput of the telescope - camera - detector system for a particular line ( excluding the filter ) @xmath20=transmission at a particular line of a filter @xmath21=surface brightness of a particular line in photons @xmath22 @xmath23=system throughput of the telescope - camera - detector system for the continuum ( excluding the filter ) @xmath24=effective width of the filter in @xmath25=surface brightness of the continuum in photons @xmath26 . it is important to note that this calibration is done in units of the number of photons . when necessary , the resulting numbers can be converted to the relative flux . in this program multiple lines contributed to the signal from a single filter only in the case of f656n ( h@xmath11 - 6563 , -6548 +6583 ) and f658n ( -6583 , h@xmath11 - 6563 ) . we considered the contribution of h@xmath13 4340 to the f437n filter , but found it to be negligible . the reference regions were all taken from b91 . they observed with a long slit of east - west orientation located to the east of @xmath0 ori c. the exact location was incorrectly expressed in b91 , but is correctly described in od99 . b91 gives line ratios and continuum to h@xmath12 ratios for 21 samples along their slit . we used the six samples that overlapped with the ccd4 portion of our images ( shown in figure 1 ) that included 4363 relative intensities . each sample was 2x 15.76 in size . the results of this calibration gave the following equations for the two important line ratios , h@xmath11/h@xmath12 and 4363/5007 . @xmath27}{(1 - 1.28\frac{n_{469}}{n_{487}})},\ ] ] and @xmath28}{[1 - 1.62\frac{n_{469}}{n_{502}}(33.4\frac{n_{469}}{n_{547}}+0.423)]}.\ ] ] equation ( 2 ) uses a full - image average value for the color of the continuum and scales the continuum intensity from the closer continuum filter . equation ( 3 ) derives the color of the continuum at each pixel and then extrapolates or interpolates from the two continuum filters , this step being necessary as the continuum correction is quite important in the f437n measurements . the continuum typically contributes about 73% of the total signal in the f437n filter . in a similar investigation of planetary nebulae rubin et al . ( 2002 , henceforth r2002 ) argued that there should be a small correction in the f437n filter for contamination in the blueward wing by h@xmath13 4340 emission . if one takes the pre - launch transmission profiles in the instrument handbook at face value , this would seem to be the case . however , it must be expected that the profiles of the filters change as they age in space . these changes are why we wanted to calibrate our observations within the data set . one would expect that the transmission near the principal lines to not change much with time , since they are located near the peak of the filters transmissions , whereas the h@xmath13 line falls far out on the wing of the filter curve . the instrument handbook indicates that the ccd sensitivities and throughput of the system have been remarkably constant . this combination of factors allowed us to empirically search for evidence of h@xmath13 contamination . we could determine the ratio @xmath29 with and without a correction for h@xmath13 contamination . with the correction the ratio was 0.42 and without the correction the ratio was 0.68 . the instrument handbook values indicate an expected value for the ratio of 0.62 . this indicates that the correction to the 4363 line surface brightness for h@xmath13 is about 10% . since the method of calibration essentially forces the calibration constants to be such as to give the right intensity ratios for the lines assumed to be present , this means that the effects of h@xmath13 correction will only enter in regions where the line and the h@xmath13 line vary considerably in relative intensity . this is not the case for the area covered by the present images ( b91 , epte98 ) . the scatter of results from the six different samples in the calibration region indicates that the uncertainty of the balmer line ratios will be 7% , while that of the line ratios will be about 12% . since the reddening corrections between 4363 and 5007 are small , the effects of the absolute uncertainty of the balmer line ratios are negligible . a 12% systematic uncertainty of the line ratios would make the derived values be off systematically by @xmath30 k. this will not significantly affect our search for fine scale variations in . as we will see in 3.3 , there is excellent agreement between the electron temperatures derived in b91 and those derived in this study . the extinction corrections are based on determining the balmer line ratio for each pixel and then calculating the total extinction from comparison with the intrinsic ratio . this total extinction was then used to correct the line ratios . we assumed with epte98 that the intrinsic balmer line flux ratio was 2.91 . using the same extinction law as epte98 means that the extinction corrected ( @xmath31 ) flux ratios could be calculated from the observed flux ratios ( @xmath32 ) by the relation @xmath33 the extinction values derived from the balmer line ratios are in good agreement with those of odell & yusef - zadeh ( 2000 ) , this being the case for both their results obtained from radio continuum to h@xmath11 ratios and those obtained from their balmer line ratios . the reddening corrected line ratios were then used to derive local values of . a convenient formulation of the relation of line ratio and is given in r2002 . their equation ( 8) can be restated as @xmath34 where we have restated the relation using the common - usage designation of the wavelengths in air ( rather than the more physically meaningful vacuum wavelengths employed by r2002 ) . since we are dealing with large numbers that are not usually determined to high precision , we sometimes will express by the frequent nomenclature @xmath35@xmath36/10,000 . the resulting image is shown in figure 2 . figure 2 shows multiple features . the most common are the `` scars '' that result from stars . these continuum sources are often saturated on some of the images used to derive . even when they are not saturated , the formal value of at the star positions is subject to big uncertainties owing to the multiple subtractions that occur in the derivation . within ccd1 there are multiple features that are related to scattered light from @xmath0 ori c and the more westward members of the trapezium . any apparent fluctuation in within ccd1 is suspect as being an artifact . there are a few features characterized by very low values of , which are discussed in 4.3 . this derivation gives for the six sample regions from the b91 study @xmath37@xmath35@[email protected] , while values given in b91 for the same samples gives @xmath37@xmath35@[email protected] . a comparison with the epte98 study is not possible because only their position 2 fell within a part of our image that was not useful as it fell within ccd1 and their position 1 was north of our field . it is important to assess the effect of the expected poisson noise on the determination of because of the low signal level in some of the filters . in the region that was used for calibration the total number of recorded electrons ( 7 times the number of adu s recorded per pixel ) for the key filters were f437n(1260 ) , f469n(1260 ) , f547m(8400 ) , and f502n(10500 ) . in the following discussion , we ll assume that the root mean square deviation of a signal n is n@xmath40 . this is what we will mean as the probable error ( p.e . ) . we will assume that for multiplicative factors the p.e.s add quadratically . unfortunately , one can not determine the p.e . directly from the observations since the nebula is intrinsically variable in surface brightness . an assessment of the p.e . per pixel was done by creating noisy images ( using iraf task _ mknoise _ ) of the appropriate noise level for each of the observationally determined components of equation ( 3 ) , then determining the p.e . of the resulting image . the p.e . was 20% . in most of the following discussions we will assume this uncertainty . equation ( 5 ) was then used to determined the effect of uncertainties of the line ratio on the derived value of . a 20% photometric p.e . produces a p.e . in of 5.7% . throughout this paper we will present uncertainties as probable errors ( p.e . ) calculated as the reciprocal of the root - mean square deviation of the recorded signal . the assumptions used in 3.1 for the derivation of eq . 3 are not fully justified since there are two weak lines that affect the signal in the more important continuum filter , f469n . the line appears at 4702 and the line at 4713 , where the transmissions are 0.51 and 0.15 , respectively . as we will demonstrate in this section , the effect of these lines is small in determination of in the nebula . the presence of these weak lines will make the continuum at f469n appear brighter than it is . if we call the enhanced signal in the f469n n@xmath41 and the signal that would be observed if there were only continuum radiation n@xmath42 , then their ratio will be given by @xmath43 the strength of the continuum is usually measured with respect to the h@xmath12 line at 4861 . this was done in b91 , where their figure 2 presents a quantity which is related to the equivalent width ( @xmath44 ) by @xmath8/@xmath44 . the average value of their plotted quantity is 9.5 , which gives an average @xmath44= 510 , which is in good agreement with earlier filter photometry over a wide range of the nebula ( odell & hubbard 1965 ) which showed that @xmath44 is nearly constant in the inner region of the nebula , then decreases outward . having values of @xmath44 allows us to express the observed - quantity ratios of equation ( 6 ) as s@xmath45/s@xmath46=@xmath44s@xmath47/s@xmath48 and s@xmath49/s@xmath46=@xmath44s@xmath50/s@xmath48 . making this substitution and inserting the known values allows the restating of equation ( 6 ) as @xmath51 if the ratio of line intensities with respect to h@xmath12 are constant across the region observed , then there is no net effect , since they will be constant in the calibration region and their affects will cancel out . however , if the line ratios vary , there will be an effect on the derived line ratios . anticipating that this effect is small , we address only the effect on equation ( 3 ) . since the correction term in the denominator of that equation is only about 0.015 , we can demonstrate adequately the effect of varying contaminating line strengths by considering only the terms in the numerator . if ( n@xmath41 / n@xmath42)@xmath52 is the value of the ratio of these quantities in the region used for calibration , we can express the local effect by multiplying the n@xmath53 rates by ( n@xmath41 / n@xmath42)/ ( n@xmath41 / n@xmath42)@xmath52 . the global average values ( taken from a section of ccd2 free of the peculiar effects due to shocks that are discussed in 4.2 are n@xmath54/n@xmath55= 0.0094 , n@xmath53/n@xmath56=1.04 , and n@xmath53/n@xmath57=0.016 . inserting these values into the numerator of equation ( 3 ) and applying a constant correction of 0.015 for the subtractive term in the denominator , gives @xmath58\}.\ ] ] the weak contaminating lines are seen only at high spectral resolution . in the study of osterbrock , tran , & veilleux ( 1992 ) , fluxes relative to h@xmath12 were 0.00245 and 0.00686 for 4702 and 4713 respectively ( for an east - west region 47 long centered 58 north of @xmath0 ori c ) . epte98 found ratios of 0.00179 and 0.00645 for a region 45 north of @xmath0 ori c and 0.00186 and 0.00621 for a region25 south and 10 west of @xmath0 ori c. these three samples would indicate values of n@xmath41 / n@xmath42 of 1.066 , 1.056 , and 1.055 respectively . the contaminating lines were not measured in b91 due to their lower spectra resolution . there is another set of data that provide even more information . co - authors antonio and manuel peimbert together with mara teresa ruiz obtained a long slit spectrum with the vlt3 telescope ( melipal ) and the fors1 spectrograph at the paranal observatory in chile on 2002 september 10 . the slit was oriented at a position angle of 340 and passed through the feature called hh 202-s in odell et al.1997 ( henceforth o97)and designated in figure 2 . to estimate the intensity of the 4702 line , they measured the intrinsically stronger line at 4658 and we scaled it to the 4702 intensity by using the line ratio of 0.32 from epte98 . likewise , they also measured the strength of the 4713 feature , a blend of [ ar iv ] line at 4711 and the at 4713 the [ ar iv ] line contributing about 15% of the blend intensity . the average of a 2section , which is close to the east - west calibration samples from b91 , gave ratios relative to h@xmath12 of 0.0061 and 0.0060 for 4702 and 4713 respectively , giving a value of n@xmath41 / n@xmath59=1.0551 . the scatter of this value , taken from six 20subsamples was @xmath390.0064 . a similar scatter was found from an analysis of both 20 and 2 samples . recalling that the effect of this 5% level contamination cancels out in our calibration procedure leaves us only to consider the effect of the variation in the value of due to the varying level of contamination . the variations in contamination indicated by the paranal data indicate that the corresponding variations in the derived is + 80 and -120 k. the `` temperature image '' can be used to look for variations in at large and fine scales . in this section we describe the results of a search for systematic changes , and explain the regions of apparently very low and high values of . we also present the evidence for small scale changes , and give the results of a fourier analysis of the temperature fluctuations . we looked for variations of with distance from the dominant ionizing star @xmath0 ori c. nine samples of 10x10 were taken from each of ccd2 - 4 . in each case there were no scars from bright stars and none of the low regions discussed in the next section . the average gave @xmath37@xmath608890@xmath39496 k. no statistically significant correlation was found when trying to fit a linear relation to the observed values of and distance from @xmath0 ori c. we conclude that there are real variations in across the region sampled in this study , but there is no obvious relation to the position in the nebula . the scatter of 496 k is significant since the scatter due to poisson statistics within each sample would be only 5 k and we estimated in 3.5 that the scatter due to variations in the contaminating weak lines would be about @xmath39100 k. there are several regions within ccd2-ccd3-ccd4 that have anomalously low values of the derived , as seen in figure 2 . these all fall within the province of known herbig - haro ( hh ) objects hh 202 ( cant et al . 1980 , o97 ) and hh 269 ( walter et al . 1995 , bally , odell , & mccaughrean 2000 ) . the former is probably the result of a pre - main sequence star s blueshifted jet striking the foreground veil of neutral material(o97 ) . the latter is probably the result of blueshifted jet outflow from a pre - main sequence star that lies behind the mif and has yet to be identified ( odell & doi 2003 ) . it is almost certain that hh 269 has the same source as that producing the series of shocks extending to the east and designated as hh 529 ( bally , odell , & mccaughrean 2000 ) and it is likely ( odell & doi 2003 ) that this is also the source for the jets producing hh 202 and the double object hh 203+hh 204 that lies to the southeast , near @xmath61 ori a. these anomalously low features are probably not real , rather , they are the result of contamination of the f469n filter . our method of calculation of the line ratios assumed that the f469n filter was free of any emission lines , i.e. it was used as a measure of the continuum . in all of the nebula for which spectra exist this assumption is good since the star producing most of the ionization of the nebula ( @xmath0 ori c ) is too cool to doubly ionize helium and there are only the two weak contaminating lines ( c.f . hartigan ( 1999 ) has shown that if a fast jet forms a bow shock in material that is already photoionized then one can expect he ii to be present . he used ground based images to look for evidence for emission in the he ii 4686 line . the only region where he thought that this line was present was in hh 202 , but with his low resolution images he could not conclude that 4686 emission was present . the present high resolution images show that there are anomalies at several of the shocks known to exist in this field of view ( but certainly not in all the known shocks ) . the anomalous feature to the southwest from hh 202-s corresponds to a faint shock visible only in h@xmath11 and , but not in ( o97 ) . the paranal spectra described in 3.5 were centered on hh 202-s . the spectra show no 4686 emission . however , there is a considerable enhancement of emission . in a sample centered on hh 202-s , the flux ratio of 4658 to h@xmath12 was 0.031 , which predicts a 4702 to h@xmath12 ratio of 0.010 ( using the flux ratio from epte98 ) . together with a normal 4713 contribution , this would raise the ratio n@xmath41 / n@xmath42 to 1.18 , which would artificially reduce the 4363 ratio by a factor of 4.6 , and decrease the derived value of to 6300 k. since the paranal sample on hh 202-s was 20 long and the object is much smaller , the contamination would be much larger on the object itself and the artificially derived correspondingly lower . direct confirmation of contamination by 4702 was obtained by high velocity resolution spectra obtained by co - author odell and will henney with the manchester echelle spectrometer ( meaburn , et al . 1984 ) on the 2.1-m telescope at san pedro martir observatory on 2002 october 23 , where one sees significant enhancement of that line , peaking at the optically brightest portion of hh 202-s , with no indication of 4686 emission . this means that enhanced emission is a common feature of the anomalously low spots seen in figure 2 , rendering useless the values there . why is enhanced in these shocks is in itself an interesting problem that should be addressed . several proplyds occur within our sample , the brightest within ccd2 - 4 are 141 - 301 and 182 - 413 . these proplyds and the fainter , less well resolved ones all show enhanced values of . in this case the anomaly is probably due to the mis - application of equation ( 5 ) , which is applicable only in the limit of electron densities ( @xmath62 ) low as compared with the critical density ( @xmath63 ) for . @xmath63 is the density at which collisional de - excitation of the upper state giving rise to an emission line is equal in probability to a spontaneous emission . this is only of concern for the 5007 line as its @xmath63value is much lower than that for the 4363 line . rubin et al . ( 2003 , henceforth r2003 ) give @xmath63(5007 ) @xmath64 6.4x10@xmath65 @xmath66 , which is much higher than densities encountered in the nebula , but comparable to characteristic values for the proplyds ( odell 1998a ) . this means that in the local ionization fronts of the proplyds the 5007 emission is being suppressed by collisional de - excitation and the value derived from equation ( 5 ) will be an upper limit . this same interpretation is applied by r2003 to their high for the proplyd 159 - 350 , which lies in the center of our ccd1 image and fell in their long slit spectrum . in their models of the proplyds close to @xmath0 ori c henney et al . ( 2002 ) argue that the formal temperatures derived without consideration of collisional de - excitation would be about 20,000 k. if the densities of the more distant proplyds are much lower , as indicated by their surface brightnesses , then the effects of collisional de - excitation are less and some of the temperature increase we find is real . it is not clear if the similar local increase in at the jet feature just south of the dark rim ( odell & yusef - zadeh 2000 ) in the southeast corner of ccd4 is due to this same effect . the jet has a known high radial velocity ( odell et al . 1997 ) and proper motion ( odell & doi 2003 ) , so it may be that is enhanced where this flow shocks against ambient nebular gas . figure 2 indicates that there are variations in even though we ve shown in 4.1 that these variations are not a function of distance from @xmath0 ori c. the smaller scale changes have been illuminated by looking at the three sample regions depicted in figure 2 , these samples being selected to be free of the [ fe iii ] contamination . the results are shown in figure 3 . in each case the range of temperature is @xmath39 1000 k. for reference , random noise at the level of 5.7 % probable error is shown , this being the level expected for the bright portions . the southwest sample is about one fourth the surface brightness of the other samples . the noise level was brought down to that of the other samples by taking samples of 2x2 pixels in this region . examination of figure 3 shows that the face of the nebula is mottled with small scale variations of with angular dimensions of about 10 and amplitudes of about 400 k. in order to gain a more quantitative evaluation of the data , we performed a fourier analysis of two regions of the @xmath35 image . the first was a 400x400 pixel section in the northwest portion of ccd2 and the second was 250x250 pixels in the northeast section of ccd4 , both being free of camera scars and the local apparent drops that are due to shocks , as discussed in the analysis was done using stsdas tasks with iraf . the procedure was the same for each sample . the first step was to subtract the average value of the sample from each pixel and then to make a power spectrum of the resulting image , using the task _ powerspec_. a radial profile was taken of the power spectrum image using the center as the origin . the result was a profile that dropped down to a constant value at large spatial frequency values and represents the noise level due to the poisson noise in the data . this constant value was then subtracted from the radial profile of the power spectrum . the resulting noise - subtracted power spectrum was then converted to the physically more meaningful length space by multiplying the power spectrum in spatial frequency by the square of the frequency and binning the result in the spatial dimension . the results are shown in figure 4 and figure 5 . these plots show that there is a large amount of power at the finest scales ( sub - arcsec ) but that power is found at all scales . this analysis is similar to that of vannier et al . ( 2001 ) of h@xmath67 emission arising near the imbedded bn - kl sources to the north of ccd4 . the aims of this section are to estimate representative values of the temperature variations [ @xmath1(o@xmath68 ) , @xmath1(o@xmath69 ) , and @xmath1(h@xmath69 ) ] in the orion nebula in order to compare them with predictions of photoionization models and to be able to study the physical conditions of the nebula including its chemical composition . we proceed in three steps : 1 . ) use of the @xmath9 map obtained in this paper to determine @xmath10(o@xmath68 ) across the plane of the sky ( this is the first detailed 2-dimensional set of temperatures across of the orion nebula ) , 2 . ) estimate the 3-dimensional value of @xmath1(o@xmath68 ) ; 3 . ) estimate @xmath1(h@xmath69 ) including both the o@xmath70 and the o@xmath68 regions . in order to obtain the observed mean square temperature variation in the plane of the sky , @xmath10(o@xmath68 ) , we will define a set of equations . the average temperature , @xmath71 , and the mean square temperature fluctuation , @xmath72 , are given by @xmath73 and@xmath74 respectively , where @xmath75 and @xmath76 are the local electron temperature and density , @xmath77 is the local ion density corresponding to the observed emission line , and @xmath78 is the observed volume ( peimbert 1967 ) . by recognizing that the observations correspond to averages over a given line of sight , it becomes necessary to define the columnar temperature , , as @xmath79 where @xmath11 is the right ascension and @xmath80 is the declination of a given line of sight ( corresponding to a given pixel ) . then , the average temperature can be written as @xmath81 and the mean square temperature variation over the plane of the sky , @xmath10 , can be defined as : @xmath82 in table 2 we list a set of @xmath10(o@xmath68 ) values obtained from equation ( 13 ) and from the @xmath83 map presented in figure 2 . to determine @xmath10(o@xmath68 ) we have excluded several features in order to diminish the noise of the samples : the pixels with very low flux , where we expect the temperature deviations to be mostly due to errors and not to physical inhomogeneities ; the shocks , where the destruction of dust could be enhancing the 4702 line and thus producing spurious temperatures ; the proplyds , whose density is not well represented by equation ( 5 ) ; the seams between the ccds , where there are border effects . keeping in mind these exclusions we defined the six regions from table 2 as follows : regions 1 and 2 include most of the pixels of the se and sw regions as defined in figure 3 ; region 3 includes most of the pixels in a 54 `` @xmath84 73 '' region in the eastern part of ccd4 ; region 4 is the largest sample , it includes most of the pixels from ccd2 , ccd3 , and ccd4 ; finally region 5 includes approximately 72% of the pixels of region 4 where , in order to enhance the s / n ratio , the southern 10% of ccd2 , the southwestern 50% of ccd3 , and the western 25% of ccd4 have been removed , the regions removed are the ones of relatively low emission measure . although the signal in ccd1 was high , the presence of scattered light artifacts ( c.f . 2 ) prevents its use in our analysis . column 2 , of table 2 , presents the number of independent temperatures used in the region ; column 3 presents the average temperature , weighted by @xmath85 ( defined in equation ( 12 ) ) ; while column 4 presents the measured @xmath10(o@xmath68 ) for each region . the @xmath10 of regions 1 , 2 , and 3 is in the 0.0050.016 range . the differences in @xmath10 are real since they are larger than the expected observational errors . this could have 2 explanations : a ) region 3 is more homogeneous than regions 1 and 2 ; b ) another possibility is that @xmath1 is similar in the 3 regions , and the variations along each line of sight in region 3 are larger , while there are not so many variations along the lines of sight in regions 1 and 2 , thus giving a set of more homogeneous values of @xmath9 for region 3 than for regions 1 and 2 . we added most of the pixels from ccd2 , ccd3 , and ccd4 to generate region 4 . figure 6 presents a histogram of the 1.5 million temperatures included in region 4 . the mean square temperature deviation obtained from the histogram is @xmath86 ; which is not @xmath10 . it is not possible to derive directly @xmath10 from the histogram since each temperature has to be weighted by the corresponding emission measure ( see equation ( 13 ) ) . after weighting each value for the emission measure we obtain a @xmath87 for region 4 . we still have to subtract a value associated with the noise . the average p.e . in @xmath88 for the whole sample is 5.7 % , however this value is for an average pixel , while the measured @xmath89 gives more weight to the brightest pixels , the ones with the smaller errors . by considering that the average pixel is 1.89 times fainter than the average pixel weighted by emission measure , we expect the representative p.e . to be 4.2 % , which corresponds to an error on @xmath10 of 0.0017 , that is a @xmath90 . if we take out the noisiest parts of region 4 ( the outermost parts ) , we have region 5 . here the measured @xmath91 . for region 5 we expect the noise to be about 2/3 the noise of the entire region , that is a p.e . of 3.8 % per pixel . in region 5 the average pixel is 1.31 times fainter than the average pixel weighted by emission measure ; thus we expect the representative p.e . to be 3.3% , which corresponds to an error on @xmath10 of 0.0011 , that is a @xmath92 . we expect the @xmath10 result for region 5 to be more accurate ; however , by excluding the outermost parts we seem to be ignoring a fraction of the object which is intrinsically cooler . therefore we will adopt the value derived from region 4 , @xmath93 , as representative for the whole object . this value is similar to the one obtained by r2003 where they find @xmath94 values of 0.0095 , for their slit 1 , and 0.0104 , for their slit 2 . unfortunately , their slits 1 and 2 are located in our unusable ccd1 , which precludes a direct comparison . up to this point we have presented the results in terms of @xmath94(o@xmath68 ) , but what is of physical interest are the variations in three dimensions @xmath1(@xmath96 ) . in order to obtain the total @xmath1(@xmath96 ) value we need to consider the variations along the line of sight . it can be shown that the relevant equation is : @xmath97 where @xmath98 , the variation along a given line of sight , is given by : @xmath99 and the average over all lines of sight is given by : @xmath100 there are two estimates that we can make of @xmath98 : the first based on geometrical considerations and the information contained in @xmath101 ; and the second based on the ratio of @xmath96 collisionally excited lines to @xmath102 recombination lines . from geometrical considerations one would expect the inhomogeneities of one additional dimension , @xmath98 , to be at least half as large as the inhomogeneities of two dimensions , @xmath94 ; this works for large scale inhomogeneities . the power included in @xmath98 increases in the presence of small scale inhomogeneities . this is because the many independent thermal elements along each line of sight will be masked in the averaging process , greatly reducing the total @xmath94 compared to @xmath95 . therefore , @xmath98 would be expected to be much larger than @xmath94 . from the previous considerations , we estimate that @xmath103 ; this result is very model dependent which is reflected by the large range in the estimated @xmath104 value . this estimate together with the @xmath94(o@xmath68 ) value derived in the previous subsection yield @xmath105 . from the ratio of o ii recombination lines to lines in two regions of the orion nebula epte98 find that @xmath95(o@xmath106 . this @xmath95 value is representative of a very small fraction of the nebula , so we expect it to be a lower bound to the total @xmath95(o@xmath68 ) . at the same time it must be bigger than @xmath98(o@xmath68 ) because it represents an average over more than one line of sight . this argument , together with the @xmath94(o@xmath68 ) value estimated in the previous subsection , yields @xmath107 . by combining both estimates we find @xmath108 , which implies that there is power in small scale inhomogeneities . our prefered value of @xmath98 together with the @xmath94 measured in the previous subsection and equation ( 14 ) gives us a @xmath109 value . we are interested in the global @xmath95 value that we will define as : @xmath110 in order to derive the physical condtions in the region . in an region , like the orion nebula , where oxygen is only once or twice ionized , it is useful to define a value @xmath13 , that characterizes the degree of oxygen ionization , as : @xmath111 dl da};\ ] ] for such an region @xmath1 ( ) is given by ( peimbert , peimbert , & luridiana 2002 ) : @xmath112 ^ 2 \over t_0({\rm h}^+)^2},\ ] ] the first term corresponding to the temperature variations in the o@xmath68 zone , the second term corresponds to the variations in the o@xmath70 zone , and the third term corresponds to the thermal variations introduced by having two zones with different average temperatures . from the observations of peimbert & torres - peimbert ( 1977 ) and epte98 it follows that @xmath13 decreases from about 0.85 near the center of the nebula to about 0.15 in the outer regions . we will adopt a value of @xmath113 as representative of the whole object . it is necessary to estimate @xmath1(o@xmath70 ) . since @xmath114 is rarely measured we will use @xmath115 as a surrogate since we expect both temperatures to be similar as they arise from the same narrow + zone . r2003 present values of @xmath116 ; their measured values are in very good agreement with their measured values of @xmath89 ; therefore we will assume @xmath117 . it is impossible , however , to estimate @xmath118 from any set of observations available . from the geometrical arguments presented in the previous section and the similarities between the @xmath89 and @xmath119 presented by r2003 we will assume also that @xmath120 , and consequently that @xmath121 . to compute the final term in equation ( 19 ) we need to estimate the differences in temperatures between the o@xmath70 and o@xmath68 zones ( again we will use @xmath115 as a surrogate ) . our observations do not yield @xmath115 values , therefore we are forced to look for them in the literature . we are more interested in finding @xmath122 than @xmath115 to avoid possible biases , since the calibration is uncertain by a few hundred degrees ( see final paragraphs of sections 3.1 and 3.5 ) ; an additional advantage of such comparison is that papers in the literature cover regions considerably smaller than the one presented in this paper . epte98 have measured @xmath123 k and @xmath124 k ; while r2003 , for their slits 1 and 2 and assuming @xmath125 , obtain @xmath126 k and @xmath127 k. by averaging the innermost 9 regions of b91 , we find @xmath123 k and @xmath128 k. these three results give us an average @xmath129 k. as mentioned before , we have adopted a @xmath113 , giving a @xmath130 approximately 700 k higher than @xmath131 . the inputs presented above yield values of 0.011 , 0.010 , and 0.007 for the three terms in equation ( 19 ) . therefore the total magnitude of the temperature fluctuations becomes @xmath132 . notice that for values of @xmath13 in the 0.3 to 0.7 range the change in total @xmath1 is very small since @xmath121 , thus changes in @xmath13 will make very small changes in the sum of the first 2 terms of equation ( 19 ) , while the third term will change by less than 15% for that range of @xmath13 . the total @xmath133 value derived in this paper is considerably larger than the 0.004 value derived by peimbert et al . ( 1993 ) from the one dimensional model of the orion nebula presented by b91 . the type of temperature variations reported here have not been seen before because previous slit spectra determinations usually employed integrations over long areas of the nebula . the best slit spectrum sub - sampling until r2003 is in b91 , where the sample sizes were as short as 16 and one could see sample to sample changes in of about 300 k ( b91 , table 5 ) . their changes were comparable to the uncertainties in their derivations of from the line ratios , so this variation did not attract attention . however , the b91 variations are consistent with the small scale variations we see in our figure 3 . a much more valuable study is that of r2003 , where they employed the hst s stis ( space telescope imaging spectrometer ) in a long slit mode to determine in samples of 0.5x 0.5 in both and . they presented results for about 400 samples from each of four slit settings , two within our ccd1 field and the others near or off the southeast corner of our ccd2 field . it is possible to use this data to estimate a lower limit to @xmath95(h ii ) using the same procedure as in the previous section . from their slits 1 and 2 , those included in our map , it is found that @xmath134 k and @xmath135 k ; notice that these @xmath136 s corresponds to two rectangular columns of the nebula and not to a large volume . from these slits we also find @xmath137 and @xmath138 . from r2003 observations it is not possible to obtain direct estimates of the o@xmath68 and n@xmath69 temperature fluctuations along any given line of sight ; so we will use @xmath89 and @xmath116 as lower bounds to @xmath139 and @xmath140 . to estimate the two zone temperature term , the term due to the difference between @xmath141 and @xmath142 ( see equation ( 19 ) , we will adopt @xmath143 . this , together with @xmath141 and @xmath142 , yields a contribution of 0.009 . finally , adding these 3 terms , we obtain @xmath95(h ii)@xmath144 . this lower limit to @xmath95(h ii ) is consistent with our determination and with the @xmath95 determination by epte98 . moreover it is already a factor of 5 higher than the values predicted by one - dimensional photoionization models of the orion nebula , like the one by b91 . in this section we will review the large scale structure of the orion nebula ( 7.1 ) , present a conundrum arising from the presence of fine scale structure in images ( 7.2 ) , demonstrate that high resolution spectra and line ratio changes argue for a three dimensional fine scale structure ( 7.3 ) , argue that the ionization front is advancing into a highly clumpy pdr ( 7.4 ) , show how these clumps can lead to low shadows within the ionized layer that can help to explain the @xmath1 phenomenon in the region of low ionization regions ( 7.5 ) , and present a preliminary discussion of the effect of these clumps on the anomalous line - broadening in orion ( 7.6 ) . the accepted model for the orion nebula is that of a blister . the visible nebula is the result of a thin layer of photoionized gas on the front of a giant molecular cloud , with a dense photon - dominated region ( pdr ) ( van der werf et al . 1996 ) , also known ( young owl et al . 2000 ) as a photodissociation region , on the neutral side of the ionization front . gas is accelerated away from this ionization . the dominant ionizing star is @xmath0 ori c which lies at about 0.25 pc in front of the ionization front . in the foreground is an irregular veil of neutral material that produces most of the extinction ( odell 2002 ) . this model is reviewed in detail in a recent review article ( odell 2001b , henceforth od2001 . the basic physics is discussed in a review paper by ferland ( 2001 ) . the shape of the ionization front has been derived ( wen & odell 1995 , henceforth wo95 ) using a basic process originally proposed by gary ferland in b91 . this draws on the fact that at a substellar point , the surface brightness in a recombination line ( for example h@xmath11 ) is directly proportional to the local flux of ionizing photons . wo95 solved the more general problem , where the line of sight to a point in the nebula does not pass through the ionizing star . they showed that the ionization front is an irregular concave form , with an escarpment that explains the bright bar feature running near @xmath61 ori a and has a dominant hill to the southwest of @xmath0 ori c , where the orion - s radio and infrared sources are located . odell & doi ( 2003 ) have shown that the latter region is the source of multiple optical and radio outflows and probably contains a secondary source of star formation . this model was derived using a resolution of 2 . because of the progressive nature of the calculation of the shape of the surface , it is most accurate near the direction of @xmath0 ori c. the only diagnostics that we have along the line of sight into the nebula are the increasingly blue - shifted emission from the higher ionization states that are found further from the mif and forbidden line doublet intensities that indicate a decreasing density with increasing distance from the mif ( od2001 ) . these few tests that we have are consistent with the model . a detailed hydrodynamic model of the orion nebula has not been calculated , however , it is expected that the high density in the pdr region is the result of a shock moving into the molecular cloud and that the ionization front is slowly progressing into the neutral region . the hst images of the orion nebula are filled with detail , especially in the inner regions . at first blush , this appears to present a fundamental quandary if the standard model for the nebula is correct . one can derive a formal thickness ( l ) for the ionized layer , using the assumption that the density is constant and knowing the emissivity in the recombination line being observed . wo95 show that this value is characteristically about 0.13 pc for the central part of the nebula , which corresponds to an angle of 58 if the distance to the nebula is 460 pc ( bally , odell , & mccaughrean 2000 ) . they also show that if the density has an exponential decrease , its scale - height will be l/2 ( 29 ) and the emissivity would decrease with a scale - height of l/4 ( 15 ) . this means that in the standard model one should not be able to see variations in the structure of the nebula with size scales smaller than about 15 . one certainly see lots of fine - scale ( less than 15 ) structure in ground - based and hst images . some of this can be attributed to variations in the amount of extinction ( odell & yusef - zadeh 2000 ) , most of which is caused by the foreground neutral veil of material ( od2001 ) . however , the extinction corrected images in h@xmath11 show significant structure right down to the limit of the extinction corrections , which was about 1.7 . this is shown in figure 7 , which is a profile of the extinction corrected h@xmath11 image of the nebula ( odell & yusef - zadeh 2000 ) derived with a resolution of 1.7 and taken across the velocity sample region designated in figure 1 . there are even smaller features , which appear to be a continuation of the structure , as shown in the hst images , while the smallest features are due to the outflows from young stellar objects and the shocks they create in the low density ambient gas ( odell & doi 2003 , od2001 ) and are seen in the hst images to be sub - arcsecond in extent . the presence of fine scale structure associated with the main emitting layer of ionized gas presents a fundamental challenge to the accepted model of the nebula . the structure is there , for we see it , but if the ionized gas was simply a smooth flow of gas away from a homogeneous ionization front , we should not see any small scale structure . we demonstrate in 7.5 and 7.6 , that the resolution of the quandary lies in the emitting layer having a much more complex structure than assumed in published models . there are two additional lines of evidence indicating that small scale structure exists within the ionized layer , these being the structure seen in the velocities and fine scale variations in the ionization . both argue for structure down to at least a few arcseconds . the internal velocities within the orion nebula have been the subject of investigation for nearly a century , beginning with a fabry - perot study by fabry ( buisson , fabry , & bourget 1914 ) , an extensive mapping using photographic detectors ( wilson et al . 1959 ) , and a series of studies in various emission lines using ccd detectors ( [ o iii ] , castaeda 1988 ; [ o ii ] , jones 1992 ; [ o i ] , odell & wen 1992 ; [ s iii ] , wen & odell , 1993 ) at the kitt peak national observatory coud feed spectrograph at selected position angles with respect to the trapezium stars . this work was used to compare the radial velocities with the predictions of turbulence within a thin ionized layer ( von hrner 1951 ) and the results are summarized in od2001 . a more ambitious and complete mapping of the radial velocities is now being created as part of the rice university phd thesis of takao doi , who is creating velocity images of the huygens region at resolutions of 10 km s@xmath145 and 2 in the h@xmath11 , 5007 , and 6583 lines , and a similar study at the instituto de astronoma , unam , morelia , mxico in the red doublet lines by w. j. henney & m. t. garca - daz that uses in part data obtained by co - author odell . with the permission of our colleagues we have used their north - south orientation slits to create figure 8 and figure 9 . these are spectra taken from the velocity sample region indicated in figure 1 and used for the creation of the surface brightness profiles of figure 7 . the instrumental full width at half maximum intensity ( fwhm ) was very close to 10 km s@xmath145 in each case . although the original samples along the slit were at intervals of 0.64 , the seeing was characteristically about 2 during the observations . the former figure shows a half tone depiction of the spectra in lines characterizing various parts of the ionized layer and the latter presents contour diagrams of the same data . the power of this approach lies in the fact that various emission lines are characteristic of different samples of the ionized layer . although this fact is implicit in the discussion of several texts , perhaps the best illustration is in a discussion of structure of the helix nebula ( odell 1998b ) . emission comes from throughout the ionized layer , its emissivity being weighted towards the lower regions along the line of sight . the forbidden line emissivity in , , and are all weighted towards the higher regions along the same line of sight . delineation of information about structure along the line of sight is also provided by the ionization differences . emission will arise exactly in the ionization front , where ionization of hydrogen rapidly transitions from nearly unity to nearly zero . a good fraction of the emission will occur in the adjacent thin + zone , while the emission will arise in the outermost ( closest to the observer ) + zone . we see in figure 8 and figure 9 that there is considerable velocity variation along the slit and that the velocity in one ion is not well correlated with that in the other ions . thermal broadening of the h@xmath11 line precludes a detailed analysis of its velocity structure , but is low enough in the other , more massive , ions to see the differences clearly . one sees that the narrower the expected emitting region , the more structure there is along the slit . emission gives evidence for velocity structure with a scale of the seeing values of 2 and emission has a characteristic size scale down to about 5 . these data argue that structure exists within the main ionized layer at sizes down to at least 2 and that gas of different states of ionization is moving at different velocities . it is the spatially unresolved average velocity along the slits which give the characteristic progression to more blueshifted radial velocities at higher states of ionization that is the earmark of a thin blister of gas expanding towards the observer . the second line of evidence for fine scale structure within the nebula is from comparison of emission from very different states of ionization or conditions of emissivity . for this comparison we used two pairs of images , whose closeness in wavelength essentially eliminate the effects of interstellar extinction . the first pair used the f487n images , which are primarily due to h@xmath12 emission whose emissivity is like that of h@xmath11 in that it selectively comes from the lower regions , and the f502n images , which are primarily emission from 5007 high collisionally excited regions . the second pair used the f656n h@xmath11 filter and the f658n filter . the considerations for the emissivity are similar in the second pair of filters , but the emitting layer of the emission should be thinner . the hydrogen emission arises from throughout the ionized zone , but the and emission arise from selected zones , as described earlier in this section . the results of these comparisons are shown pictorially in figure 10 . one sees that there are wide variations in these ratios . some of these changes are due to shocks caused by outflows from pre - main sequence stars ( odell & doi 2003 ) while others such as the bright bar region in the southwest corner of the images is due to large scale topographic features of the ionization front ( odell & yusef - zadeh 2000 ) . in addition to these , there are many additional features . a more quantitative depiction is shown in figure 11 and figure 12 , where profiles along the same region as the velocity samples are presented . we see fine scale structure in the ratios down to nearly the size of the 1x2 bins over which the data was averaged , although a characteristic value would be 3 to 4 . the probable errors of the ratios were derived from the total counts used in their calculation and are 1.8 % for the f658n / f656n ratio and 1.2 % for the f502n / f487n ratio . as expected , the peaks are sharper in the f658n / f656n ratio , indicating that the sources are small concentrated regions . the fact that there is a general anti - correlation of the ratios indicates that the variations are largely due to ionization structure , rather than temperature differences . in summary , we can say that both the spatially resolved high resolution velocity data and the line ratio data indicate structure in the main ionized layer of 3 to 5 . a comparison with a profile of the results of the determination of is also useful and is shown in figure 13 , where a profile along the same region as the velocity data is shown . we see that the proplyd 141 - 301 shows the common characteristic of the other proplyds , in having a higher than normal formal value of @xmath35 , but , as shown in 4.3 , this is probably due to collisional de - excitation of the electron state giving rise to the 5007 emission . the `` jet '' feature shows a similar enhancement , which may also be due to having densities comparable to the critical density for this nebular transition , but it could be real , being the result of shock heating at the interface with the ambient nebular gas . aside from these features , there are variations in all along the slit . in the well exposed region from 50 to 150 we calculate that the probable error of is 0.5% i.e. 45 k. , which is small as compared with the observed variations . there are no obvious general patterns of changes with the extinction corrected surface brightness in h@xmath11 , the velocity changes , nor the line ratios . there is considerable evidence that the pdr behind the ionization front of the orion nebula is very clumpy ( tauber , goldsmith , & dickman 1991 , hogerheijde , jansen , & van dishoeck 1995 ) . hcn and hco@xmath69 observations by young owl et al . ( 2000 ) demand that the portion of the pdr seen obliquely behind the bright bar feature possesses dense clumps ( 3 x 10@xmath146 @xmath66 ) embedded within an interclump medium of lower density ( 5 x 10@xmath147 @xmath66 ) . more direct observations come from imaging in h@xmath148 . van der werf et al . ( 1996 ) show that clumps exist from a scale of 40 down to their resolution limit of 1.5 . the highest angular resolution study in h@xmath148 is that of vannier et al . ( 2001 ) who studied a region northwest of @xmath0 ori c at a resolution of 0.15 . again , they saw clumpy structure , in this case going down to 1.5 - 2.0 . a clumpy structure in the pdr is not unexpected and there would be several instability mechanisms that operate there ( capriotti 1973 , brand 1981 , vishniac 1994 , garca - segura & franco 1996 , williams 1999 ) . the implications of these clumps for the nature of the ionized layer of gas in the nebula are very important since it is into these clumps and the interclump medium that the ionization front advances . where the density is lower , the advance will be more rapid . the expected rate of advance of the ionization front is not known as the hydrodynamic problem has not been solved . the orion nebula is old enough that it is in a state of quasi - equilibrium and the velocity will depend on many factors , including whether or not the photoionizing star @xmath0 ori c has a velocity component towards or away from the molecular cloud . this means that one would expect the ionization front advancing into a clumpy pdr to move beyond the dense clumps and be retarded at the clumps , so that a microscopic view of the ionization front would be like that of a stubble - field . the region behind a dense knot would then be shadowed from ionizing lyman continuum ( ) radiation coming directly from @xmath0 ori c and would be illuminated only by diffuse ( sometimes called scattered ) photons . where the density is insufficient to form a quasi - static ionization front , the clumps will simply retard the advance of the ionization front , while the dense clumps will form a small local ionization front that will exist until it has lost sufficient material through photoevaporation that the ionization front can penetrate , then totally disperse it . the shadowed regions behind the knots within the ionized layer can be sources of low temperature emission and of temperature variations , therefore they will increase the @xmath1 value . the photoionization equilibrium in such a shadowed region was considered 30 years ago ( van blerkom & arny 1972 , kirkpatrick , 1972 , capriotti 1973 ) , but it is only recently that the more general case has been considered ( cant et al . 1998 , henceforth c98 ) . the region illuminated only by diffuse lyc will see a lower temperature radiation field because most of the recombinations of that produce the diffuse lyc will result in a photon just above the ionization threshold , while the direct stellar field will have more high energy photons and produce higher regions . c98 have solved the general problem , rather than trying to apply their calculations to only a specific object , including the role of ambient gas density and the time variability of the shadowed zone structure . when the combination of the stellar radiation density ( the diffuse radiation field density is about 15 % of that ) and gas density is right an ionization front can form immediately at the edge of the shadowed cylinder of gas . as the radiation density increases and/or the density decreases , the ionization front can form within the shadowed cylinder and even produce a condition where the shadowed cylinder is completely photoionized . c98 argue that within the ionized shadow zone will be about 6000 k , considerably cooler than that of the directly illuminated gas . the radiation from the shadowed zone can be seen by the distant observer for two reasons . in some cases the angle between the line of sight from the observer to @xmath0 ori c can be quite different from the angle between @xmath0 ori c and a local spot on the ionization front , allowing direct view of the shadowed region . even when that is not the case , a significant fraction of the radiation from the shadowed region will be scattered by dust in the nearby pdr , in the same way that radiation from the ionized layer is scattered and produces the observed redward asymmetry of the emission lines ( odell , walter , & dufour 1992 , henney 1998 ) . shadowed regions have already been detected in the orion nebula . in a study of both the cometary knots in the helix nebula and the proplyds in the orion nebula , odell ( 2000 ) showed that the proplyds cast ionization shadows as long as 0.2 pc . the proplyds are optically thick to lyc radiation ( odell 1998a ) and in that sense resemble the optically thick clumps we argue exist at the main ionization front of the nebula . the proplyd ionization shadows are most visible when the geometry is such that the shadow falls into the ionized layer that provides most of the radiation identified as the nebula . odell ( 1998a ) showed that the shadows of the proplyds covered about 0.5% of the view from @xmath0 ori c. by assuming : pressure equilibrium , @xmath149 , @xmath150(n@xmath70 ) = 10,100 k ( b91 , epte98 , r2003 ) for the directly illuminated regions , and @xmath150(n@xmath70 ) = 6,000 k ( c98 ) for the shadowed regions we obtain a contribution of 0.0093 to @xmath1(o@xmath70 ) ( see equation ( 10 ) ) , that is a contribution of 0.0043 to the total @xmath1 ( due to second term of equation ( 19 ) ) . to reach the estimated 0.011 contribution to @xmath1 due to the o@xmath70 zone , we need an additional 0.7% of the volume of the nebula to be in a different type of ionized shadowed region . in what follows we will propose the presence of high density clumps inside the ionized layer left behind by the advancing ionization front . in the model we propose ( illustrated in cartoon form in figure 14 ) the clumps would not be permanent , rather , they would exist in the ionized layer only until they are destroyed by photoevaporation . the cool columns of gas behind them would then come to the higher equilibrium appropriate for illumination by @xmath0 ori c rather than diffuse lyc . one can approximate the results of an ionization front advancing into a clumpy pdr , as described in 7.4 . we dont know the velocity of this advance . it must be small , because the tracers of the ionization front ( [ o ii ] and [ s ii ] ) are blueshifted 2.5 km s@xmath145 with respect to the pdr tracers ( co , c ii ) ( odell 2001a ) . this blueshift is probably due to the hot gas tracers coming from a layer that has already been accelerated by the pressure gradient , rather than being the result of @xmath0 ori c moving away from the pdr . the radial velocity of @xmath0 ori c is highly uncertain because of variability probably arising in the extended atmosphere of the star . it is unlikely that this star is moving at a high velocity with respect to the other cluster stars and their velocity is the same as the pdr ( odell 2001a ) within the uncertainty of 3 km s@xmath145 . in the discussion below we will assume that the ionization front is advancing into the pdr at a rate of 2 km s@xmath145 , but it should be recognized that this could be off by a factor of two . in 7.5 we showed that the fluctuations in the surface brightness of the nebula indicate structure with a height of about 0.025 pc . this would mean that the characteristic clump will have been illuminated by lyc radiation for about 1.3x10@xmath147 years , which we will call the kinematic age . if we can determine the column density and rate of loss of atoms per unit time and area , we can calculate the time that the clumps can survive photoevaporation and have a check on our basic model . if the clump diameters are about 0.0044 pc ( corresponding to 2 ) and the densities are 3x10@xmath146 @xmath66 ( young owl et al . 2000 ) the average column density of a clump would be 2.8x10@xmath151 atoms @xmath152 . the corresponding mass would then be about 7x10@xmath153 g ) . the photoevaporation rate for these clumps will be very similar to those of the proplyds , which henney et al . ( 2002 ) have shown to be 8x10@xmath154 m@xmath155 yr@xmath145 . since these objects are comparable in size to the clumps at the ionization front , their average rate of loss of atoms is relevant , this being 2x10@xmath156 atoms @xmath152 s@xmath145 . in this case , the lifetime of the clumps would be about 5,000 yrs . however , the proplyd measured by henney et al . ( 2002 ) must be much closer to @xmath0 ori c than the ionization front , so that the rate of loss has been overestimated and the survival age of the clumps underestimated . this means that the survival age of the clumps and their kinematic ages are compatible . they are , however , close enough that the process involved must be a dynamic one , with any one clump surviving for only about 10@xmath147 years , but the number of clumps present at any time would be about constant as new clumps are revealed by the advancing ionization front . we can estimate the effect of these shadowed regions if we know their emissivities and volumes . if the shadowed regions exist long enough that dynamical equilibrium is established with their surroundings ( c98 ) , then their volume emissivity will be four times that of the ambient lower density and higher gas . if pressure equilibrium is not established , then the emissivity increase will be about two times that of the ambient gas . if one interprets the non - jet fluctuations in the extinction corrected h@xmath11 surface brightness ( figure 7 ) as being due to knots at various distances from @xmath0 ori c , then they lie in a range of about 0.025 pc or 11 , which is comparable to the emissivity scale - height of 15 derived in 7.2 . this means that the shadowed regions occur within the zone where most of the emission occurs . to calculate the contribution to @xmath1(o@xmath70 ) and @xmath1 due to the shadows behind these clumps we need an estimate of the fraction of the emission produced in the shadowed regions . assuming : a ) the typical clump density to be @xmath157 @xmath66 , b ) the average density of the ionized media to be @xmath158 @xmath66 , and c ) that half of the ionized matter originated from the photoevaporation of these clumps , it follows that the volume originally occupied by the clumps must be about 1/1200 of the total volume . however , the shadowed volume is larger than the volume occupied by the clumps ; we know that the shadows are approximately 0.025 pc long , while each clump is approximately 0.0044 pc across , so the shadowed volume can amount to approximately 1/200 of the volume of the region closest to the main ionization front , before these clumps are photoevaporated . since these clumps survive long enough to cast 0.025 pc shadows , and the emissivity scale - height of the orion nebula is of 0.034 pc the total volume of the shadowed regions is about 1/250 of the effective emitting volume . there are three possible physical conditions in the shadowed regions : a ) that they are completely neutral , in this case they will not contribute to @xmath1(o@xmath70 ) nor to @xmath1 ; b ) that they are completely ionized , but not in pressure equilibrium with their surroundings , then their contribution to @xmath1(o@xmath70 ) would be about 0.0038 and to @xmath1 of about 0.0016 ; and c ) that they are completely ionized and in pressure equilibrium with their surroundings , then their contribution to @xmath1(o@xmath70 ) would be about 0.0075 and to @xmath1of about 0.0032 . the contribution of the shadows , including the shadows of the clumps and of the proplyds , amounts to @xmath159 , that corresponds to @xmath160 . note that in the shadowed regions oxygen is either neutral or once ionized , and that therefore the shadowed regions do not contribute to the @xmath1(o@xmath68 ) value it can be shown that the ionized part of the proposed clumps has a very small effect on @xmath1 . the clumps are expected to be close to the pdr , and their ionized part will have a larger density than the interclump medium , so we expect the oxygen in the ionized fraction of the clumps to be singly ionized . additionally the clumps cover a total solid angle of about 0.03 steroradians , and therefore absorb less than 1/400 of the ionizing photons , about 1/800 . this implies that their emissivity amounts to about 1/800 of the total emissivity of the nebula and that the physical conditions in the high density photoevaporated region will produce a negligible effect in the increase of @xmath1(o@xmath70 ) or @xmath1 . there is an unexplained component of line broadening in the orion nebula that may be explained by the clumpy model for the ionized layer that we propose . this anomaly first surfaced with castaeda s ( 1988 ) study of , and remained with the inclusion of other massive ions ( , jones 1992 ; , odell & wen 1992 ; , wen & odell 1993 ) . after quadratic subtraction of the instrumental , thermal , and turbulent components of broadening , there remains a large and unexplained line width having fwhm@xmath6410 km s@xmath145 . the large thermal width of the lines makes it difficult to accurately determine the extra width there , however , wilson , et al.s ( 1997 ) study of the h64@xmath11 line indicates an unexplained broadening component ( called the turbulent velocity in their paper ) of [email protected] km s@xmath145 . this extra broadening component has been re - addressed using spectra made with the keck telescope for the study of proplyds and their jets ( henney & odell 1999 , bally , odell , & mccaughrean 2000 . the keck data were very useful as they have the highest velocity resolution ( 6 km s@xmath145 ) of any of the optical wavelength studies and allow examination of all of the primary lines of , , , , he i , h@xmath11 , and h@xmath12 at exactly the same positions . samples were taken from 14 long spectra centered on 137 - 349 , 150 - 353 , 163 - 357 , 170 - 337 , 177 - 341 , 182 - 413 , and 244 - 440 ( the designation system is described in odell & wen 1994 ) and 28 long spectra taken at the positions 137 - 349 , 150 - 353 , and 163 - 357 . after correction for instrumental , thermal , and turbulent ( assumed to be 1 km s@xmath145 ) broadening , the remaining line widths ( fwhm in km s@xmath145 ) were h@xmath11 [email protected] , h@xmath12 [email protected] , he i 5876 [email protected] , 6583 [email protected] , 6300 [email protected] , 5007 [email protected] , 4959 [email protected] , 6731 [email protected] , and 6312 [email protected] . the only source of [ o ii ] data are those found in the thesis of michael jones ( 1992 ) who found for [email protected] for the central 80x 80 . the longer keck slit spectra were subjected to a separate analysis using various fractions of the total slit length and no variation of the results were seen , i.e. there was not a relation between sample size and the residual line width . the radio ( h64@xmath11 , [email protected] ) and optical ( h@xmath11 , [email protected] and h@xmath12 , [email protected] ) are in agreement within their individual uncertainties . the unexplained broadening in the emission lines that arise from the lower temperature component of the nebula is twice that of lines arising from the higher temperature component . we see that the recombination lines of h i and he i that preferentially come from cool regions have a clearly larger unexplained width ( average 19.4 km s@xmath145 ) than the collisionally excited forbidden lines that preferentially come from hot regions ( average 10.9 km s@xmath145 ) . this strongly argues against the broadening arising from alvn waves ( od2001 ) since they would have little dependence upon . the explanation certainly does not lie with there being a systematic difference in , because the sense of the correlation is opposite to that expected . the clearcut differences in the extra broadening in collisional and recombination lines is probably related to the the mechanism giving rise to the temperature inhomogeneities . can the broadening be due to the clumpy structure that we argue can explain the temperature inhomogeneities ? odell & wen ( 1992 ) argue that clumps having sizes of less than 2.3 could produce the extra broadening , but this argument was made before knowledge of the larger broadening of the hydrogen lines . the steady process of destruction of the clumps by photoevaporation would certainly give rise to flows away from the clumps . however , the line broadening due to this should selectively be a blueward distortion of the integrated line - of - sight line profile , except for the final stage of destruction , when material would be flowing in all directions . however , the initial phase of a shadowed region would be accompanied by material flowing inward towards the low pressure zone that would exist when the shadowed drops and the shadowed region is moving towards a state of hydrostatic equilibrium . it is obvious that these situations need to be theoretically modeled . although it is not now possible to quantitatively link them , it is likely that the explanation of the electron temperature fluctuations and the line widths are related . from our @xmath9(o@xmath68 ) map of the orion nebula , that includes 1.5 x 10@xmath146 independent temperature determinations , we have found that @xmath10(o@xmath68)@xmath161 . from our @xmath10(o@xmath68 ) value , together with geometrical considerations and other observations in the literature , we estimate that @xmath1(o@xmath68)@xmath162 . note that the total @xmath1(o@xmath68 ) is larger than @xmath10(o@xmath68 ) because in addition to the variations across the plane of the sky it includes the temperature variations along the line of sight . from our @xmath1(o@xmath68 ) value and comparisons between the temperatures in the low- and high - ionization zones , the o@xmath69 and o@xmath68 zones , we find that @xmath1(h ii)@xmath163 . @xmath1(h ii ) is different to @xmath1(o@xmath68 ) because in addition to the variations in the o@xmath68 zone includes the variations in the o@xmath69 zone and the difference in the average temperature between both zones . our derived @xmath1(h ii ) value is 7 times higher than those obtained from homogeneous one - dimensional photoionization models of the orion nebula . a combination of sources needs to be found to explain the large @xmath95 values observed in the orion nebula . many possible causes of temperature variations have been discussed in the literature like : density variations , deposition of mechanical energy , deposition of magnetic energy , presence of shadowed regions , chemical inhomogeneities , dust heating , and transient effects due to changes in the ionizing flux . from observations of variations in surface brightness , columnar electron temperature , radial velocity , and ionization , we have established the presence of significant small scale structure at the 1 - 5 arc sec level . the small scale velocity and ionization structures are probably strongly linked with the temperature structure . the presence of this small scale structure is compatible with a new model for the structure of the nebula near the ionization front . we posit that this front is advancing into the highly clumpy photodissociation region revealed by radio and infrared observations . these clumps possess ionized shadows that are of low . a quasi - static equilibrium exists in which any one clump survives the process of photoevaporation only for a short time . the process may be common to most regions which have a portion that is ionization bounded . there is an unexplained component of line broadening in the orion nebula that may be explained by the clumpy model for the ionized layer that we propose . we have discussed the presence of shadowed regions due to proplyds and to high density clumps near the pdr . we estimate that the shadowed regions can contribute @xmath160 to the total @xmath95 value , which together with the homogeneous one dimensional ionization structure provide only from about one third to about half of the observed @xmath95 value . additional sources of temperature variations are needed to explain the total @xmath95 observed value . moreover , since in the shadowed regions o is only once ionized , these regions could be responsible for temperature variations in the o@xmath70 zone , but not in the o@xmath68 zone , and since the @xmath1(o@xmath68 ) value is very large we need one or several additional sources of temperature variations to explain it . there is an anomalous broadening mechanism operating in the orion nebula which is unexplained . it broadens h and he recombination line emission by about 19 km s@xmath145and the forbidden line emission from heavy ions by about 11 km s@xmath145 . since these two types of lines selectively rise from the low and high temperature components along a line of sight , it appears likely that this process is related to the @xmath1 problem . michael richer and will henney provided valuable support in obtaining the high velocity resolution spectra at the mexican national observatory at san pedro martir . will henney also provided several useful comments on an earlier version of this paper . takao doi kindly shared before publication the results of his orion nebula radial velocity program , which allowed us to generate figure 8 and figure 9 . henney also provided observations on the expected rate of motion of the ionization front in the orion nebula . gary j. ferland provided estimates for the heating rates . christopher a. coco measured the keck spectra line widths as part of his senior thesis at rice university . the authors are grateful to patrick hartigan of rice university and robert rubin of the ames research center for discussions on some aspects of this work . cro s work was supported in part by grant go-9141 from the stsci to vanderbilt university . mp s work was supported in part by grant in 114601 from dgapa unam . baldwin , j. a. , ferland , g. j. , martin , p. g. , corbin , m. r. , cota , s. a. , peterson , b. m. , & slettebak , a. 1991 , apj , 374 , 580 ( b91 ) bally , j. , odell , c. r. , & mccaughrean , m. j. 2000 , aj , 119 , 2919 brand , p. w. j. l. 1981 , mnras , 197 , 217 buisson , h. , fabry , c. , & bourget , h. 1914 , apj , 40 , 241 cant , j. , goudis , c. , johnson , p. g. , & meaburn , j. 1980 , a&a , 85 , 128 cant , j. , raga , a. , steffen , w. , & shapiro , p. r. 1998 , apj , 502 , 695 ( c98 ) capriotti , e. r. 1973 , apj , 179 , 495 castaeda , h. o. 1988 , apjs , 67 , 93 esteban , c. 2002 , rev . mexicana astron . , 12 , 56 esteban , c. , peimbert , m. , torres - peimbert , s. , & escalante , v. 1998 , mnras , 295 , 401 ( epte98 ) ferland , g. j. 2001 , pasp , 113 , 41 garca - segura , g. , & franco , j. 1996 , apj , 469 , 171 garnett , d.r . 1992 , aj , 103 , 1330 . gruenwald , r. , & viegas , s.m . 1992 , apjs , 78 , 153 hartigan , p. 1999 , apj , 526 , 274 henney , w. j. 1998 , apj , 503 , 760 henney , w. j. , & odell , c. r. 1999 , aj , 118 , 2350 henney , w. j. , odell , c. r. , meaburn , j. , garrington , s. t. , & lpez , j. a. 2002 , apj , 566 , 315 hogerheijde , m. r. , jansen , d. j. , & van dishoeck , e. f. 1995 , a&a , 294 , 792 holtzman , j. a. , burrows , c. j. , castertano , s. , hester , j. j. , trauger , j. t. , watson , a. m. , & worthey , g. 1995 , pasp , 107 , 1065 jones , m. r. 1992 , phd thesis , rice univ . , houston , tx kirkpatrick , r. c. 1972 , apj , 176 , 381 liu , x .- w . 2002a , rev . mexicana astron . , 12 , 70 meaburn . j. , blundell , b. , carling , r. , gregory , d. f. , keir , d. , & wynne , c. g. 1984 , mnras , 210 , 463 odell , c. r. 1998a , aj , 115 , 263 odell , c. r. 1998b , aj , 116 , 1346 odell , c. r. 2000 , aj , 119 , 2311 odell , c. r. 2001a , pasp , 113 , 29 odell , c. r. 2001b , araa , 39 , 99 ( od2001 ) odell , c. r. 2002 , rev . mexicana astron . , 12 , 12 odell , c. r. , & doi , t. 1999 , pasp , 111 , 1316 ( od99 ) odell , c. r. , & doi , t. 2003 , aj , 125 , 277 odell , c. r. , hartigan , p. , lane , w. m. , wong , s. k. , burton , m. g. , raymond , j. , & axon , d. j. 1997 , aj , 114 , 730 ( o97 ) odell , c. r. , hartigan , p. , bally , j. , & morse , j. a. 1997 , aj , 114 , 2016 odell , c. r. , & hubbard , w. b. 1965 apj , 142 , 591 odell , c. r. , walter , d. k. , & dufour , r. j. 1992 , apj , 399 , l67 odell , c. r. , & wen , z. 1992 , apj , 387 , 229 odell , c. r. , & wen , z. 1994 , apj , 436 , 194 odell , c. r. , & yusef - zadeh , f. 2000 , aj , 120 , 382 osterbrock , d. e. , tran , h. d. , veilleux , s. 1992 , apj , 389 , 305 peimbert , a. 2003 , apj , 584 , 735 peimbert , a. , peimbert , m. , & luridiana , v. 2002 , apj , 565 , 668 peimbert , m. 1967 , apj , 150 , 825 peimbert , m. 1995 , in the analysis of emission lines , eds . r. e. williams , & m. livio ( cambridge ) , 165 peimbert , m. 2002 , rev . mexicana astron . , 12 , 275 peimbert , m. , peimbert , a. , & ruiz , m. t. 2000 , apj , 541 , 688 peimbert , m. , storey , p. j. , & torres - peimbert , s. 1993 , apj , 414 , 626 . peimbert , m. , & torres - peimbert , s. 1977 , mnras , 179 , 217 rubin , r. h. , bhatt , n. j. , dufour , r. j. , buckalew , b. a. , barlow , m. j. , liu , x .- w . , storey , p. j. , balick , b. , ferland , g. j. , harrington , j. p. , & martin , p. g. 2002 , mnras , 334 , 777 ( r2002 ) rubin , r. h. , martin , p. g. , dufour , r. j. , ferland , g. j. , blagrave , k. p. m. , liu , x .- w . , nguyen , j. f. , & baldwin , j. a. 2003 , mnras , in press , ( astro - ph/0212244 ) , ( r2003 ) stasiska , g. 2002 , rev . mexicana astron . , 12 , 62 tauber , j. a. , goldsmith , p. f. , & dickman , r. l. 1991 , apj , 375 , 635 torres - peimbert , s. , & peimbert , m. 2003 , in planetary nebulae and their role in the universe , iau symposium 209 , in press , ( astro - ph/0204087 ) van blerkom , d. , & arny , t. t. 1972 , mnras , 156 , 91 van der werf , p. p. , stutzki , j. , sternberg , a. , & krabbe , a. 1996 , a & a , 313 , 633 vannier , l. , lemaire , j. l. , field , d. , pineau des forts , g. pijpers , f. p. , & rouan , d. 2001 , a&a , 366 , 651 vishniac , e. t. 1994 , apj , 428 , 186 von hrner , s. 1951 , zap , 30 , 17 walter , d. k. , odell , c. r. , hu , x. , & dufour , r. j. 1995 , pasp , 107 , 686 wen , z. , & odell , c. r. 1993 , apj , 409 , 262 wen , z. , & odell , c. r. 1995 , apj , 438 , 784 ( wo95 ) williams , r. j. r. 1999 , mnras , 310 , 789 wilson , o. c. , mnch , g. , flather , e. m. , & coffeen , m. f. 1959 , apjs , 4 , 199 wilson , t. l. , filges , l , codella , c. , reich , w. , & reich , p. 1997 , a&a , 327 , 1177 young owl , r. c. , meixner , m. m. , wolfire , m. , tielens , a. g. g. m. , & tauber , j. 2000 , 540 , 886 lccccccl e@xmath17 & 16.56 & 17.40 & 19.87 & 22.79 & 601.9 & 22.0 4 & 31.19 + @xmath164 & 0.50 & 0.52 & 0.59 & 0.64 & & 0.78 & 0.79 + @xmath165 & 0.005 & & & & & 0.24 & 0.045 + s & 0.061 & 0.074 & 0.084 & 0.091 & 0.125 & 0.145 & 0.145 + Abstract:

Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.

Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered . Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video . Paper: it has been recognized for many years that observations of clusters of galaxies can be applied effectively to test theories of the evolution of the universe . as the largest gravitationally bound objects emerging from the growth and subsequent collapse of primordial density fluctuations , their spatial distribution at different epochs is a relic containing evidence which can test cosmological models of structure formation . x - ray astronomy has enhanced the results of such studies greatly , for a number of reasons . first , clusters are x - ray sources of relatively high luminosity , with a luminosity function sufficiently well defined to allow , in principle at least , cosmic structure to be studied out to epochs of @xmath6 and beyond . further , ambiguities in the identification of clusters , caused by chance line - of - sight superposition of objects , are fewer in x - ray than in optical sky surveys . this is a consequence of the sharply peaked x - ray brightness distribution in most clusters , and of the relatively low surface density of bright x - ray sources . second , the x - ray properties of clusters are defined by events reaching back to the earliest epoch of cluster formation , and therefore may be used to test cosmological models . the x - ray luminosity and temperature of the intracluster gas depend on the cluster mass , so that the shape and amplitude of the luminosity and temperature functions of the cluster population are dependent on the spectrum of the early density perturbations . further , the morphology of clusters in the whole population may be dependent on the characteristics of the expansion , and is a diagnostic of cluster merging processes . finally , the abundance of heavy elements in the intracluster gas is a measure of galaxy evolution and ram - pressure stripping , and of the proportion of primordial gas in the cluster . therefore much effort has been given to the production of statistically complete samples of x - ray emitting clusters . the first were produced using @xmath7 ( schwartz 1978 ) and @xmath8 ( mchardy 1978 ) observations , and the heao-1 all - sky surveys ( piccinotti et al . 1982 ; kowalski et al . 1984 ) , and contained up to 76 clusters . the flux limits of these surveys ( @xmath9 , expressed here in the rosat band @xmath1 ) , and their angular resolution were limited by the use of proportional counters , and improvements were possible only after the first missions using imaging x - ray instruments . edge et al . ( 1990 ) reported the use of einstein and exosat observations to refine the results of the earlier surveys , producing a sample of 55 clusters free of , for example , the effects of source confusion . in the einstein extended medium sensitivity survey ( emss ) it was possible , by examining the fields of einstein pointings covering a total of 740 @xmath10 , to create a sample with a flux limit of @xmath11 and containing clusters with redshifts out to @xmath12 ( henry et al . 1992 ) . the rosat x - ray telescope , equipped with an imaging proportional counter in the focal plane , allowed for the first time complete detailed surveys of large areas of sky ( trmper 1983 ) . the analysis of the rosat all - sky survey ( rass ) proceeded in two phases rass-1 and rass-2 , described below in section 3.1 , in which the second phase incorporated a number of improvements suggested by rass-1 ( voges et al . . the first x - ray flux - limited samples of clusters based on analysis of a large area of sky in the rosat survey were obtained by romer et al.(1994 ) , romer ( 1995 ) , ebeling et al.(1996 ) and ebeling et al . ( 1998 ) . the sgp sample described in romer et al.(1994 ) , based on analysis of the rass-1 data base , contained 161 cluster candidates with a limiting flux of @xmath13 . redshifts were obtained for 128 clusters in this sample , and this subset was used in a study of the cluster spatial correlation function ( romer et al . 1994 ) . the bcs survey by ebeling et al . ( 1998 ) addressed the whole extragalactic sky ( @xmath14 ) in the northern hemisphere , and reanalysed the fields in which clusters had been detected in the rass-1 analysis . the survey yielded a sample of 201 clusters at @xmath15 , having a limiting flux of @xmath16 , which is statistically complete at the 90 percent level . in a recent publication the bcs sample has been extended to an x - ray flux limit of @xmath17 , at which the completeness was 75 percent ( ebeling et al . 2000 ) . a recent survey of clusters in the northern sky ( noras ) , based on x - ray sources classified as extended in the rass analysis , is described by bhringer et al . deeper surveys have been possible in areas around the ecliptic poles ( henry et al . 2001 , gioia et al . 2001 , mullis et al . 2001 and voges et al . 2001 ) , where the rosat survey achieved unusually long exposure times , and in areas where deep pointings have been made ( romer et al . 2000 , jones et al . 1998 , rosati et al . 1998 , vikhlinen et al . 1998 and collins et al . the deepest survey was made by rosati et al . ( 1998 ) , in which the sample was complete down to a flux of @xmath18 and included clusters out a redshift of @xmath19 . in what follows we concentrate on complete large - area cluster surveys in the southern hemisphere . this has its roots in an agreement between the royal observatory in edinburgh ( roe ) , the naval research laboratory ( nrl ) and the max - planck - institut fr extraterrestrische physik ( mpe ) in garching , made early in the rosat program , to make the cosmos digitised uk schmidt iiia - j survey of the southern sky ( macgillivray & stobie 1985 , yentis et al . 1992 ) available for identification of x - ray sources . this data base , containing @xmath20 objects with a limiting magnitude of @xmath21 , was installed at mpe for use in x - ray source identification . in cluster studies it was used to derive unbiased lists of candidates through systematic correlations of x - ray source positions with concentrations of galaxies . a comprehensive search for clusters is being undertaken at mpe in the reflex southern hemisphere project ( bhringer et al . 2001 ) . the first results ( de grandi et al . 1999 ) described a sample of x - ray bright clusters , obtained by searching a region of area @xmath22 ( @xmath23 ) . the study reanalysed clusters identified in the rass-1 analysis and arrived at a sample of 130 clusters having a completeness of at least 90 percent and a limiting flux of @xmath24 in the @xmath1 band . the complete reflex study area covers @xmath25 in the southern sky , and the techniques used in constructing the cluster sample have been described by bhringer et al . ( 2001 ) . at the current stage of the study a sample of 452 clusters has been obtained , which is at least 90 percent complete , using a flux limit of @xmath26 . a power - law fit to the log n - log s distribution yielded an exponent of @xmath27 . collins et al . ( 2000 ) have analysed the spatial correlation function of clusters using a reflex sample of 452 clusters covering an area 4 times larger than the sgp , and derived a value of @xmath28 mpc for the correlation length , significantly greater than the value of @xmath29 mpc obtained by romer et al . however for the 109 reflex clusters in the sgp area collins et al . ( 2000 ) find a correlation length of @xmath30 mpc , consistent with the result of romer et al . the difference between the complete reflex and the sgp results is most likely due to sample fluctuations caused by cosmic variance ( see collins et al . a significant conclusion of the reflex study is that low - density cold dark matter ( cdm ) models ( @xmath31 ) provide a better fit to the observed correlation function , and that high - density cdm models ( @xmath32 ) yield a poorer fit because they provide insufficient power at large scales . schuecker et al . ( 2001 ) have analysed the power spectrum of the reflex sample , and the results are consistent with the results of collins et al . ( 2000 ) . a prominent aspect of the sgp and reflex survey projects has been optical observing programs to obtain cluster redshifts , which we describe briefly in section 2 . however , it should be borne in mind that while these two projects have a common root and have followed similar procedures for cluster selection , x - ray analysis and redshift determination , they do possess some differences in approach . following this introduction section 2 provides a summary of how the sgp survey was performed . section 3 describes the various procedures by which the cluster sample was extracted from the rass-2 data base and section 4 summarises how the x - ray energy flux and luminosity were calculated . section 5 presents the sgp cluster catalog in the form of a table and describes the archive of sgp cluster images in the form of overlays of the x - ray and optical data , which is accessible at mpe over the internet . section 6 examines the completeness of the cluster sample and section 7 discusses the large - scale structure traced by the clusters out to a redshift of @xmath33 . finally a summary of the results and conclusions of the paper are presented in section 8 . throughout the article we have assumed that the hubble constant @xmath34 , the deceleration parameter @xmath35 and the cosmological constant @xmath36 . this survey selected a region at high galactic latitude in the southern sky centered on the south galactic pole . rectangular in shape , it extends in right ascension from @xmath37 to @xmath38 and in declination from @xmath39 to @xmath40 ( see figure [ f18 ] ) , giving it an area of 1.013 steradian . the search for clusters in this region invoked no flux threshold , but intead worked to the limit of the rass data to maximise the completeness of the sample of cluster candidates . a flux limit is established subsequently to define a complete subsample . the first step in the search for clusters was to select all x - ray sources found in the region by the rass-2 analysis ( voges et al . 1999 ) . in this analysis the threshold values for the source detection algorithmns were lowered ( section 3.1 ) , with the aim of achieving as deep a survey as the rass would allow . therefore cluster searches using this data base have more sensitivity than has been available to previous southern hemisphere searches using the rass-1 data base ( romer 1995 , de grandi et al . 1999 ) . the rass-2 analysis was not equipped for detailed examination of the x - ray properties of extended sources such as clusters . to this end a number of techniques have been developed , including voronoi tesselation and percolation ( vtp , ebeling & wiedemann 1993 ) , the steepness ratio technique ( srt , degrandi et al . 1997 ) and the growth curve analysis ( gca , bhringer et al . the goal of these techniques is to obtain reliable fluxes for both extended and point sources , and to extract from the raw data as much information as possible about the x - ray source characteristics . in this study the gca technique has been used to analyse the list of candidates obtained from the rass-2 data base . cluster candidates were selected from this sample using the cosmos digitised iiia - j survey and a search procedure called csearch . this procedure , which is not designed to select clusters in an unambiguous manner , compares the galaxy density around the rass-2 position with the background galaxy density on the uk schmidt plate , and derives a probability that the result was a random coincidence . a sample of cluster candidates is obtained by setting a threshold to this probability , and this threshold is set low enough to ensure that few genuine clusters are lost and a high completeness is attained in the final sample . in our study a rass-2 list of 11981 sources is reduced by csearch to 3236 candidates ( section 3.3 ) . at this point much remains to be done to remove contaminating sources , which we estimate from internal statistical tests to comprise about half the candidates , in an objective process . at high redshifts ( @xmath41 ) the method reaches a limit of the cosmos data , when many cluster galaxies become so faint as to be classified by cosmos only as faint objects , which are not counteed by csearch . therefore some clusters at high redshift may be missed , which may be one source of incompleteness near the flux limit of the survey . the analysis of this sample of cluster candidates began by setting a limit of @xmath42 to the x - ray count rate in the hard band ( @xmath43 , section 3.1 , 3.4 ) , which reduced the number of candidates from 3236 to 477 . this was followed by the process of removing contaminating sources from this sub - sample , which proceeded through a number of stages . the first was the removal of cosmos artifacts , bright sources which to the eye were clearly not clusters , and redundant detections by rass-2 of the same source , particularly in extended sources such as clusters . this was done by examination of cosmos optical finding charts and of overlays of the optical and x - ray images . the second was to correlate rass-2 positions with the simbad catalog , in order to eliminate bright stars found in the rass-2 error circle , and then to use two x - ray properties of the source , hardness ratio and extent , as selection criteria . the hardness ratio was used to exclude those stars and active galactic nuclei ( agn ) whose spectra are sufficiently soft to exclude the possibility that the source is a cluster . the x - ray extent was used to classify candidates in three groups , namely clusters , agn candidates and a remainder of uncertain nature . the third and final stage , identifying the clusters and known agn among the remaining sample , proceeded along two parallel paths . the first comprised correlations of the candidate list with a variety of catalogs , in particular the nasa extragalactic data base ( ned ) , the simbad catalog , and the veron catalog of agn ( veron - cetty & veron 1998 ) . the second was an ongoing examination of the results of the supporting optical observations , described below , which identified agn in the sample . we summarise here briefly the sources of incompleteness in the final catalog obtained , which reduce the cluster count at low fluxes : + i ) the csearch analysis has a predetermined level of incompleteness in correlating + x - ray sources with galaxy concentrations ( section 3.3 ) . + ii ) the sharp count - rate limit ( @xmath42 ) rejects some sources at low energy + flux , due to the variation of interstellar column density in the field ( section 3.4 ) . + iii ) some distant clusters elude the tests applied in searching the list of candidates + yielded by csearch and the x - ray count - rate cut ( section 3.5 ) . + finally , a vital complementary part of the sgp survey and the reflex project has been a program of optical observations to obtain the redshifts of those clusters detected in the rosat survey , for which no redshifts were available in the literature . the sgp survey , which commenced not long after the launch of rosat in 1990 , was supported by three campaigns at the 4 m anglo - australian telescope ( aat ) and three at the 1.9 m telescope of the south african astronomical observatory . the results of these campaigns have been reported by romer ( 1995 ) . a larger program , which started in 1992 and was completed in 1995 , was installed as a key project at the european southern observatory ( eso ) . its purpose was to obtain redshifts for clusters in the reflex sample . an ongoing continuation of these observations is being pursued to support the extension of the reflex survey to lower x - ray flux limits . the rosat observatory was launched on 1990 june 1 , and saw first light on 1990 june 16 ( trmper et al . 1991 ) . after a two - month verification of the instrument operation it commenced its six - month long survey of the whole sky on 30 july 1990 . during the rass the observatory rotated about an axis through the sun , scanning on a given day a @xmath44 wide strip passing through the ecliptic poles the survey ended on 1991 february 18 . the first analysis of the survey ( rass-1 ) , which took place in 1991 - 1993 , used data collected into the same @xmath45 wide strips , and yielded a list of some 50,000 sources containing positions and such characteristics as count - rate , hardness ratio , angular extent and source detection likelihood . rass-1 was used to test the algorithms implemented in the analysis and to start scientific studies , and as a consequence a series of improvements was initiated ( voges et al . 1999 ) : + i ) sorting the data into 1378 sky fields of size @xmath46 , overlapping at least @xmath47 . + this improved the efficiency of source detection . + ii ) for operational reasons the rass-1 data base contained a few regions of low + exposure , which were filled in later by supplementary observations . this + later data was included in the rass-2 data base . + iii ) searching for sources in the soft @xmath48 , hard @xmath49 and broad + @xmath50 energy bands independently . + iv ) refining the pointing attitude solution and improving source positions . + v ) improvement of the spline - fit to the background , yielding more accurate source + count - rates . + vi ) the list of candidates selected by the sliding - window source detection algorithmns + was increased by lowering the detection threshold , and in the subsequent maximum + likelihood analysis the likelihood threshold for accepting sources was lowered + from 10 ( rass-1 analysis ) to 7 . + reanalysis of the survey data using the new software ( rass-2 ) was performed in 1994 - 1995 , yielding a list of 145060 sources . the sgp field contained 11981 sources above a likelihood threshold of 7 . the characteristics of the new software and results from the rass-2 analysis have been described by voges et al . the results described here relied solely on the rass-2 data base ( rass bright source catalog in voges et al . 1999 and rass faint source catalog in voges et al . 2000 ) . the @xmath45 wide rass scan strips overlap to an extent which increases with ecliptic latitude , and consequently the exposure time grows and reaches a maximum at the poles . this effect is visible in the map of the rass exposure time in the sgp survey region ( figure [ f1 ] ) , in which there is a systematic increase from the nw to the se corner . upon this change are superposed striations caused by periodic protective shutdown of the focal - plane detector as it traversed radiation belts . analysis of the exposure map of the sgp survey region yields the histogram shown in figure [ f2 ] , in which the mean exposure time is 300 seconds . there is an area of @xmath51 in the sgp field , in which the exposure time is less than @xmath52 . the roe cosmos digital data base contains the results of scanning 894 plates of the uk schmidt iiia - j ( blue ) southern hemisphere survey . the sgp study area contains 161 fields , each of size @xmath53 . cosmos analyses and classifies each object in a field , and records the @xmath54 magnitude , position ( r.a . and declination ( 2000 ) ) and object shape parameters . objects are classified primarily as stars , galaxies or faint objects , the last being objects whose low intensity on the plate defies a reliable determination of their class . heydon - dumbleton , collins , & macgillivray ( 1989 ) compared the cosmos galaxy number count - magnitude distribution with those derived from several independent optical surveys , and deduced that the galaxy sample was essentially complete ( @xmath55 percent completeness level ) to a magnitude limit @xmath56 . beyond this limit the star - galaxy discrimination gradually becomes less reliable as @xmath54 increases ( macgillivray & stobie 1985 , heydon - dumbleton et al . 1989 ) , leading to a significant incompleteness of the galaxy sample in the range @xmath57 . in the cosmos data base star / galaxy separation was performed down to a limit of @xmath58 . an example of the results is given in a figure , which shows the @xmath59 galaxies identified by cosmos in the sgp field ukj 411 ( this figure is in the published article , but was too large for this archived version ) . the galaxy magnitudes have been calibrated using photometric ccd observations of sequences of galaxies , which were used also in the calibration of the edinburgh / durham galaxy catalog ( heydon - dumbleton et al . 1989 ) . for any given plate cosmos yields a galaxy intensity , which depends on such factors as exposure time , emulsion characteristics and measures taken to keep the plate in a dry environment during exposure . this implies that the galaxy magnitudes for any given plate must be adjusted to match the surrounding plates . this is done by identifying galaxies in the overlapping border zone of adjacent plates , and deriving a shift which matches the galaxy magnitudes . no unique solution for the whole southern sky is possible , and instead a set of plate magnitude shifts is obtained by a fitting procedure which globally minimises the inconsistencies between adjacent plates . the resulting cosmos galaxy magnitudes are on an arbitrary machine scale , which now must be adjusted to match the ccd calibrations , in essence providing a global zero point solution to the matched plate data . this is done by fitting a correlation between the ccd and cosmos magnitudes of galaxies in the ccd observation sequences . to further ensure there were no calibration problems as a result of the iosophotal thresholding of the cosmos galaxies ( isophotal thresholding results in loss of light below the isophote level used and hence underestimation of the true brightness of a galaxy ) , we accepted for calibration purposes only galaxies in the cosmos data which were at least three magnitudes above the plate limit ( i.e. @xmath60 ) . this resulted in 207 sequence galaxies being accepted for calibration . the rms scatter of the correlation between the cosmos and the ccd magnitudes for these galaxies was found to be @xmath61 . as the intrinsic error in the ccd photometry is estimated to be @xmath62 , we estimate that the resulting error in the magnitudes derived for galaxies in the cosmos iiia - j southern hemisphere survey is @xmath63 . some independent corroboration of the cosmos galaxy photometry is provided by the study of caretta , maia , & willmer ( 2000 ) . they confirm after comparisons with their ccd data that the cosmos galaxy magnitudes are reliable at the @xmath63 level . their results indicate that galaxy samples are @xmath64 percent complete at magnitudes down to @xmath65 , in broad agreement with the cosmos estimates . however this agreement should be treated with caution , as caretta et al . ( 2000 ) studied a small area of sky having a lower galaxy count than is available in the uk schmidt southern hemisphere survey . the cluster search procedure ( csearch ) counts galaxies within 5 circles of radius @xmath66 = 1.5 , 3 , 5 , 7.5 and 10 arcmin ( circles 1 through 5 ) , centered at the rosat source position , and compares the results with those of random sampling in the ukj field . these radii correspond to the range of expected cluster core diameters ( e.g. at @xmath67 a radius of 300 kpc is equivalent to an angular scale of 1.1 arcmin and at @xmath68 to 11 arcmin ) . the random sampling was performed 1000 times for each radius , yielding for each field five histograms of the galaxy count . for each histogram a table is created , giving the probability @xmath69 that the galaxy count exceeds a value , @xmath70 : + @xmath71 where @xmath72 is the number of cases where the galaxy count was @xmath73 . selection of cluster candidates is made after setting a threshold @xmath74 , which implies that for each plate a threshold be set for @xmath70 . individual plate sensitivity and statistics make this galaxy count threshold vary from plate to plate and yield a significant uncertainty . the following argument describes how this is circumvented by analysing the ensemble of probability values @xmath69 for the whole sgp rass-2 source sample . the rosat source is accepted if the probability associated with one of the 5 galaxy counts ( circles 1 through 5 ) at the rosat position falls below a selected threshold @xmath75 . for convenience , we have defined and used the quantity @xmath76 , as this approaches a maximum value of 1 for cluster candidates . the range @xmath77 is divided into bins of equal width ( typically 400 in number ) , and for any given search radius @xmath66 we create a histogram of the source count ( @xmath78 ) per bin for all the rass-2 sources in the sgp field . if there were no correlation between the rosat position and the galaxy count , as would be close to the truth for an ensemble of stars and agn , the expectation value for the number of sources , @xmath78 , per bin would be independent of @xmath79 ( bhringer et al . figure [ f4 ] shows the histograms of the probability p obtained for the rosat sources detected in the sgp region . to save space we show results for @xmath66 = 1.5 , 3 , 5 and 10 arcmin only . the major characteristic of these histograms is indeed a flat distribution with statistical fluctuations , but in addition there is an enhancement at values of @xmath79 approaching @xmath80 , which is the signature of clusters . a comment on the data used to create these histograms is necessary . following the first csearch analysis of the sgp sources in the rass-2 data base , examination of images overlaying the x - ray and the optical fields revealed multiple detections by rass-2 of the more nearby clusters , due to their markedly extended x - ray emission ( e.g. a119 ) . this biases the csearch analysis , and therefore we removed 256 redundant multiple detections from the rass-2 sgp source list , and then repeated the analysis . this number is small compared to the total of 11981 sources , but is more significant in relation to the size of the eventual csearch sample of cluster candidates ( 3236 ) . the threshold @xmath81 must be chosen carefully in terms of the desired compromise between formal completeness @xmath82 and contamination @xmath83 , for inevitably the selected sample contains rosat sources having chance associations with concentrations of galaxies , which build the flat distribution , and so the price of higher completeness is an increased contamination . the probability threshold @xmath81 is related to @xmath82 and @xmath83 by the following equations : + @xmath84 @xmath85 where @xmath86 is the number of sources per bin in a specified flat portion of the probability histogram . before the results of csearch are discussed , two characteristics of the histograms shown in figure [ f4 ] should be clarified . first , the dip in @xmath79 for circle 1 in the range @xmath87 is a quantisation effect , due to the galaxy count jumping from 0 to 1 . the dip for circle 5 in the same region appears to be due to sampling limits , resulting from the circle diameter being a significant fraction of the field width . we have examined the number density of clusters found in our analyses as a function of position on the plate , and have found no sign of incompleteness near the cosmos digitisation boundaries on the plate . second , whereas the histograms for circles 1 and 2 decay rapidly from the peak at @xmath88 to a flat plateau , those for circles 3 and 5 decay even more rapidly to a minimum and then rise to a second enhancement in @xmath89 , covering the range @xmath90 for circle 3 and @xmath91 for circle 5 . to search for the cause of this second enhancement we examined how candidates found using circles 1 and 2 were registered using circles 3 through 5 . a typical result ( figure [ f5 ] ) shows how compact groupings of galaxies found by circle 2 , for which @xmath92 , are detected using circle 5 . the number of sources falls sharply from @xmath93 to a minimum , rises to a peak at @xmath94 and then falls again gradually , i.e. much of this second enhancement is due to relatively compact groups , for which the number of galaxies counted is not significantly enhanced when detected with circles 3 and 5 . as a consequence the effect of increasing the circle radius is to reduce @xmath79 . the five candidate lists ( @xmath66 = 1.5 , 3 , 5 , 7.5 and 10 arcmin ) are cross - correlated to remove redundant detections , and so this second enhancement is in principle not a problem . however , if for each circle @xmath81 is set so as to yield a high value of @xmath95 ( equation 2 ) , then for circles 3 through 5 the contamination @xmath83 is increased substantially , making the subsequent screening of the sample more difficult and time - consuming . therefore as a precaution , for circles * 4 and 5 only * we have set @xmath81 at @xmath96 , so as to include only the sharp peak . we show below that this is a reliable procedure . the sgp field contains 11981 rass-2 sources having a likelihood greater than or equal to @xmath97 . table 1 shows the results of analysing this sample with csearch , and summarises the assumptions made in selecting cluster candidates . the last entry @xmath98 gives the yield of new candidates as one starts with circle 1 , and then proceeds from circles 2 to 5 , * removing redundant detections * at each stage . the trends in these numbers confirm the expectation that the smaller circles should detect the majority of clusters . the decision to set @xmath81 to @xmath96 for circles 4 and 5 was supported later by a search of the final list of 186 cluster candidates , which revealed no case in which the csearch detection relied solely on circle 4 and/or circle 5 . the total sample extracted using csearch comprised 3236 candidates . table 1 indicates that the majority of clusters are detected using circles 1 , 2 and 3 , and we deduce from column 6 that the contamination of the sample should lie between 46 and 56 percent . + ccccccc 1 & 1.5 & 0.92 & @xmath99 & 0.925 & 0.46 & 1857 + 2 & 3 & 0.90 & @xmath99 & 0.900 & 0.50 & 884 + 3 & 5 & 0.90 & @xmath100 & 0.700 & 0.56 & 428 + 4 & 7.5 & 0.95 & @xmath101 & - & @xmath102 & 33 + 5 & 10 & 0.95 & @xmath101 & - & @xmath102 & 34 + & & & & & & + previous studies found that the energy flux from extended extended sources is underestimated by the standard rass source detection algorithm ( ebeling et al . 1996 , 1998 and de grandi et al . 1997 ) , and section 2 has stated the various analyses developed to correct this problem . the growth curve analysis ( gca ) method , described in detail by bhringer et al . ( 2000 ) , has been used in this study to analyse the rass-2 data base . the gca returns among other information the following important parameters : background subtracted source count - rate and its poisson ( photon statistical ) error , a locally redetermined position of the centroid of the source x - ray emission , the mean exposure for the source region , a significance of the source detection , the radius out to which source emission is significantly detected , a hardness ratio characterizing the source spectrum and its photon statistical error , a fitted source core radius , and the probability , obtained using a kolmogorov - smirnov test , that the object is consistent with being a point source . the source position is determined with an error which in most cases is less than @xmath103 , the exceptions being nearby clusters with irregular emission structure . errors in count - rate and hardness ratio are given in our catalog ( table 3 ) . taking a2726 as an example , the hard band count - rate is @xmath104 and the hardness ratio is @xmath105 . the basic parameters are derived from the photon distribution using the three energy bands ` hard ' ( 0.5 to 2.0 kev , channel 52 - 201 ) , ` broad ' ( 0.1 to 2.4 kev , channel 11 - 240 ) , and ` soft ' ( 0.1 to 0.4 kev , channel 11 - 40 ) . the band definitions are the same as those used in the standard analysis ( voges et al . most of the derived parameters are based on analyses of data in the hard energy band , as clusters are detected in this energy band with the highest signal - to - noise ratio . one of the exceptions is the hardness ratio , which requires also the results from the soft band . the gca method uses the photon event distributions in two circles ( figure [ f6 ] ) , of radii 20 and 41.3 arcmin , centered initially on the rass-2 source center . events within the inner circle are analysed to determine the source characteristics , and those in the outer annulus are used to determine the background level . in some cases special analyses were necessary , where either clusters had an unusually large angular extent , or where two or more sources lay in a confused region , requiring the use of deblending algorithms . the source count - rate is determined from the cumulative , radial source count rate profile ( growth curve ) after background subtraction . the construction of the growth curve is preceded by a redetermination of the source center and by the background measurement . a typical example for the resulting growth curve is displayed in figure [ f7 ] , showing the count - rate plotted as a function of integration radius ( solid curve ) . the dashed lines show the limits determined by applying the photon event statistical error ( including the error for the background subtraction ) . the count - rate is determined in two alternative ways . in the first a significant outer radius of the source is defined as the point where the increase in the @xmath106 error is larger than the increase of the source signal . the integrated count - rate is calculated using events within this cutoff radius . in the second method a horizontal level is fitted to the outer region of the plateau , and this value is adopted as the standard in quoting hard - band x - ray count - rates and in calculating cluster energy flux and luminosity ( section 4 ) . however , we use the first method also as a check on the count - rate and as a means of estimating systematic uncertainties in the count - rate determination , which must be combined with the pure photon statistical errors . careful examination of the overlays of x - ray and optical images ( section 3.5.1 ) of the cluster sample revealed 19 cases in which the source was very extended , or source confusion might cause errors in deriving the source count - rate . these 19 were subjected to the special analyses referred to above , in which the source count - rates were revised . six systems were identified as double clusters and not subjected to the deblending analysis . they are identified as double clusters in the survey catalog ( table 3 ) . the other two important source properties determined by the gca method are the spectral hardness ratio and the source extent . the hardness ratio , @xmath107 , is defined as @xmath108 where @xmath109 is the hard band and @xmath110 the soft band source count - rate ( both determined for the same outer radius limit ) . the source extent is investigated in two ways . in the first a @xmath111-model profile ( cavaliere & fusco - femiano 1976 ) convolved with the averaged survey psf is fitted to the differential count - rate profile ( using a fixed value of @xmath112 ) , and we derive from the results a core radius , @xmath113 . in the second a kolmogorov - smirnov ( ks ) test is used to estimate the probability that the object is a point source . it is taken as highly likely that the source is extended when the ks probability is less than 0.01 . tests with x - ray sources which have been identified with stars and agn showed that a false classification as an extended source occurred in less than 5% of the sample . the final step in the x - ray analysis was to establish a lower limit to the source count - rate , in order to set practical limits to source identification and redshift determination . the list of 3236 candidates from the csearch analysis ( section 3.3 ) was truncated using a threshold of @xmath42 for the cut - off radius count - rate in the hard band . this reduced the list of candidates to 477 . a sharp limit in count - rate corresponds to a range of energy flux , determined by the variation of interstellar column density @xmath114 in the field , which leads to some incompleteness at low fluxes . bhringer et al . ( 2001 ) estimate a range of @xmath115 in the band @xmath1 for @xmath116 . in the sgp field @xmath117 takes on relatively low values so that , for example , for only 8 percent of the clusters selected is @xmath118 . therefore we can be certain that this source of incompleteness is absent at fluxes greater than @xmath119 . the removal of contaminating sources from the list of 477 candidates was by necessity an iterative process , in which the decisions made were reviewed repeatedly to ensure that the criteria used had been applied consistently . the following sections describe the steps in this process . for each cluster candidate a finding chart @xmath120 in size was extracted from the cosmos data base . in addition an overlay was made of the x - ray surface brightness contours upon the cosmos optical field . for example figure [ f8 ] shows the overlay made for the abell cluster a3854 . examination of these finding charts and overlays during the selection process has been valuable for several reasons . first , visual scrutiny has removed cases in which csearch had been deceived by artifacts , for example satellite trails , the haloes and diffraction spikes of bright stars , and the attempt by cosmos to resolve the structure of bright nearby galaxies . these structures often were resolved by cosmos into objects identified as galaxies . second , the rass-2 analysis resulted in multiple detections of extended sources such as clusters , which may be removed after examination of the x - ray / optical overlays . as described in section 3.3 , a significant number of redundant detections was removed to minimise any bias of the csearch analysis . however this process was not perfect , and it was possible later to identify further cases by careful re - examination of the overlays . the latter are counted in the detection statistics shown later in table 2 . finally , scrutiny of the finding charts and overlays has identified occasional errors , which are simple to correct , where a csearch candidate is identified with a faint rass-2 x - ray source having a brighter x - ray neighbour . the gca technique then has preferred the latter and derived the higher count - rate . this problem was detected through visual examination of the overlays . the temperature and extent of the hot gas in clusters of galaxies make it possible to set limits to both the x - ray hardness ratio and the angular extent of a rass cluster source ( ebeling et al . 1996 , 1998 ) . this provides effective discriminants between clusters and the majority of contaminating sources in the csearch sample , made up of agn and stars . in this section we justify the following two criteria , which have been used in removing a large fraction of these contaminating sources : + 1 ) the * upper limit * of the x - ray hardness ratio ( section 3.4 ) is less than zero , + i.e. if @xmath121 , the source is too soft . + 2 ) the core radius @xmath113 obtained from the angular extent calculation is less than + @xmath122 , i.e. the object is a point source . + these criteria were applied independently in rejecting sources . in order to establish criteria using these parameters , we selected control samples describing the characteristics of clusters , agn and stars . the first contained @xmath123 abell clusters extracted from the total sample of @xmath124 candidates ( section 3.4 ) , using as a criterion a correlation between the x - ray position and the centroid of an abell cluster . conservatively we excluded from the sample clusters where the separation between the rosat and abell positions was greater than @xmath125 , where the survey exposure was low @xmath126 , or where x - ray maps revealed nearby components in the source region , one of which might not be a cluster . in each case the x - ray / optical overlay image ( section 3.5.1 ) and the cosmos finding chart were examined . the count - rates of these clusters covered the full range of the study reported here . the second and third control samples comprised agn and stars detected by the rosat survey and identified through spectroscopic optical observations . this project was a collaboration between mpe and eso , in which the error circles of all rass-1 sources in four relatively small regions of the southern hemisphere were searched using the cosmos data base to identify optical candidates . the nature of these candidates was examined through spectroscopic observations , after which the likely source of the x - ray emission was identified ( t. a. fleming 1994 , private communication ) . using three of these fields having a total area of @xmath127 , we selected samples of @xmath128 agn and @xmath129 stars , whose positions are within 20 arcsec of the rass-2 source positions . again , the x - ray count - rate of these sources covered the full range of the cluster survey reported here . the hardness ratio ( @xmath130 ) distributions for these samples are shown in figure [ f9 ] . whereas @xmath131 for @xmath132 percent of the abell clusters in our test sample , @xmath133 for @xmath134 and @xmath135 percent of the agn and star samples respectively . therefore a conservative threshold of zero for the * upper limit * to @xmath130 has been set , above which rass sources qualify for retention in the list of cluster candidates . this is an effective method of removing a large fraction of the stars and agn in our sample of 477 candidates . the angular extent , as measured by the derived core radius @xmath113 , provides an effective test for distinguishing clusters from agn , which however runs into two difficulties . the first is caused by the diminishing size of clusters with increasing redshift , an effect which is emphasised if the cluster contains a cooling flow . the second is the effect of source confusion in a rass-2 detection of an agn , when the gca analysis may yield a finite value for the source extent . these difficulties are constrained to a certain extent by the redshift limit ( @xmath67 ) and by the limit set to the x - ray count - rate in the hard band ( section 3.4 ) . the distributions of @xmath113 derived from the two samples are shown in figure [ f10 ] . the rise in these curves at a radius of @xmath136 is a result of setting a limit @xmath137 in the gca , and to a lesser extent of the influence of surrounding sources on the growth curve analysis ( section 3.4 ) . the important characteristic is that 58 percent of agns satisfy @xmath138 , whereas @xmath132 percent of abell clusters in our test sample satisfy the condition @xmath139 . therefore only those sources among the 477 csearch cluster candidates were retained which satisfied the condition @xmath139 . as discussed in section 3.5.5 , this results in some incompleteness near the survey limit , where the rass and cosmos data become marginal in the detection of distant clusters . we have examined four clusters in the abell control sample , which were rejected when these hardness ratio and core radius criteria were used . one , associated with a2800 , failed the hardness ratio test . this may be due to contamination , as it is in a confused region of x - ray emission . three sources , associated with a3866 , s181 and s1121 , failed the core radius test . in the case of s181 the galaxies are faint and displaced from the center of the x - ray source , which is comparatively strong ( @xmath140 in the hard band ) . the small rass-2 error circle contains a stellar object ( @xmath141 ) , and therefore we conclude that this source is an agn ( the emission from agn comes from a concentrated region , so that often cosmos classifies the object as a star ) . the source coincident with a3866 has a high count - rate ( @xmath142 ) yet shows only weak signs of extent . although the spectroscopic observations ( romer 1995 ) revealed evidence of an agn , overlaying an einstein hri image upon an optical dss image indicates that the central object is probably a cd galaxy and that the x - ray source is very compact but not a point source . thus the decision to reject this source is open to correction . s1121 appears to be an example of a distant cluster near the limit of the survey sensitivity . thus four clusters in the test sample of 118 abell clusters were rejected , from which we estimate that in applying the hardness ratio and core radius criteria to our cluster sample , the loss of clusters should be less than 4 percent . bright stars appear in the sample of cluster candidates either because of a chance association with a region of high galaxy density , or because cosmos has broken down the diffraction spikes and/or halo into objects classified as galaxies . they have been removed using two tests , one being the hardness ratio test described in section 3.5.2 and one being a statistical test . in the latter we have analysed @xmath143 regions of diameter @xmath144 in the sgp field , using the cosmos data to derive the mean density of stars as a function of @xmath54 magnitude . the following argument was used to reject rass-2 sources having stars brighter than @xmath145 in the error circle . the density of stars brighter than @xmath145 was found to be @xmath146 , which implies that the probability of finding such a star by chance in a rass-2 90-percent confidence error circle , which typically has a radius of about @xmath147 , is @xmath148 . therefore if we reject all candidates having a star brighter than @xmath145 within the error circle , the loss of clusters from the sample should be no more than @xmath149 . this procedure has been applied by correlating the candidate list with stars in the simbad and tycho ( hg et al . 1998 ) catalogs . a correlation of the @xmath150 magnitudes in these catalogs with the cosmos @xmath54 magnitudes shows that the latter are lower by about 0.5 magnitudes for stars fainter than @xmath151 , but that the difference widens steadily for brighter stars . therefore in examining bright simbad or tycho catalog stars in the rass-2 error circle we set a threshold of @xmath152 , below which the star was judged to be the cause of the x - ray emission . additional stars , not listed in the simbad and tycho catalogs , were identified later by inspection of the cosmos finding charts and the x - ray / optical overlay images for the 477 candidates . the x - ray sources removed by the hardness ratio @xmath153 and core radius @xmath154 tests have been reviewed carefully , using correlations of the list of 477 candidates with the veron catalog of active galaxies ( veron - cetty & veron 1998 ) and the nasa extragalactic data base ( ned ) to identify sources for which the 90 percent rass-2 error circle contained an identified agn , and examination of the x - ray / optical overlay images and the cosmos finding charts . however in the sample remaining after these tests , after removal of stars ( section 3.5.3 ) and after identification of detections resulting from cosmos artifacts , there remained a contaminant comprising 28 sources for which @xmath155 or @xmath139 , but whose identification as a cluster was suspect . these sources were reviewed using again the veron and ned correlations , overlay images and cosmos finding charts , but in addition using the results of the csearch analysis . of these 28 we rejected 9 as being agn and 1 as an x - ray source superposed on a nearby galaxy over 5 arcmin in extent . nine sources were excluded because the extent detection was due to source confusion , and 8 because csearch either made an identification at a large radius only , inconsistent with the small x - ray extent , or made an error due to cosmos artifacts . the one remaining source requires further study and was rejected tentatively . there is a possible association with a2813 , but the minimum found by gca in the core radius fit was very shallow and the evidence for a cluster in the x - ray / overlay image was indecisive . the total number of agn identified was 127 , and figure [ f11 ] shows the distribution of their @xmath54 magnitudes , as measured by cosmos . where the agn was not identified in the veron catalog or ned , @xmath54 for the brightest object inside the 90 percent error circle was used . the half - width of the distribution lies in the range @xmath156 . finally , we discovered five candidates showing large extended regions of x - ray emission @xmath157 in diameter , whose optical fields show no signs of a significant galaxy population and whose origin as the confusion of several sources is not obvious . after removal of rass-2 sources contaminating the sgp sample of 477 cluster candidates , using the procedures described above , there remained 186 candidates . the statistics of this selection process are summarised in table 2 . of the 61 redundant rass-2 detections in table 2 which eluded the earlier screening , 24 were associated with clusters . therefore of the 477 candidate sources @xmath158 are associated with clusters , which implies that the contamination of the sample of 477 was 0.56 . this is in marginal agreement with the results of the csearch analysis ( section 3.3 ) , which predicted @xmath159 . examination of table 1 shows that @xmath160 of the cluster candidates were identified by csearch using the smaller circles 1 and 2 , and consequently that formally the contamination of the sample should be 0.5 or less , and the completeness about 0.90 . therefore we can estimate that the sample of 477 candidates should contain @xmath161 clusters and that a complete sample obtained using csearch would have yielded @xmath162 clusters . therefore we can estimate that the overall completeness of the sample of selected clusters is @xmath163 . this incompleteness , which is the sum of the three effects summarised in section 2 , contributes to the flattening of the log n / log s distribution at fluxes below @xmath2 in the band @xmath1 ( section 5 ) . cc clusters of galaxies & 186 + active galactic nuclei ( agn ) & 127 + stars & 74 + extended x - ray emission regions & 5 + redundant rass-2 detections & 61 + sources below x - ray count - rate threshold & 24 + + total & 477 + the above argument implies that @xmath164 clusters have been missed in searching the 477 candidates . this has arisen in most cases while applying the criteria @xmath121 and @xmath138 to reject candidates , and in section 3.5.2 we have estimated that applying these criteria applied to a control sample of abell clusters should yield an incompleteness of @xmath165 . two examples of clusters with overly soft spectra are a2800 ( @xmath166 ) and the cluster @xmath167 ( @xmath168 ) discovered by tucker et al . ( 1995 ) in the emss . in neither case is the nature of the contaminating source clear . one limit of this study is that the criterion @xmath139 for selecting cluster candidates will inevitably discriminate against the more distant clusters of small angular extent , particularly those in which a cooling flow makes the x - ray source more compact . this loss is evident in the flattening of the log n - log s distribution at low flux ( section 5 ) . three aspects of the analysis bear out this trend . first , of the sources rejected because @xmath138 we identified at least 4 cases , where the x - ray / optical overlays showed suggestive but marginal evidence that they were clusters . second , there were 11 in our catalog of 186 clusters , for which the detection of angular extent appeared to be near its limits . the gca yielded a small but non - zero core radius , but simultaneously the ks - test yielded significant probabilities , between @xmath169 and @xmath170 percent , of the source being point - like . third , in the case of distant clusters accepted by csearch , cosmos classified some of the galaxies as faint objects , which the csearch analysis did not count . this is obvious in some of the x - ray / optical overlays of these objects , which show the dominant elliptical galaxy with halo surrounded by faint objects . therefore we conclude that some distant clusters may have been missed by csearch . in order to convert the rosat count - rate into an energy flux outside the galaxy , the spectrum of the hot intracluster medium ( icm ) has been convolved with the response functions of the interstellar medium ( ism ) and the instrument . the plasma emissivity was derived using the version of the raymond & smith ( 1977 ) code installed in 1994 in the mpe exsas software . the technique has been verified by comparing results with those obtained using the exspec analysis code ( bhringer et al . the cluster plasma was assumed to contain elements heavier than hydrogen having abundances 0.35 times the solar abundance . the hi column densities used in calculating the ism absorption have been taken from dickey & lockman ( 1990 ) . these calculations have been made over ranges of temperature between 0.05 and 10 kev ( @xmath171-@xmath172 k ) , and of hi column density between @xmath173 and @xmath174 . the resulting matrix was used to convert the count - rate in the hard band to an energy flux @xmath175 in units of @xmath176 in the 0.1 - 2.4 kev band . for each cluster whose redshift has been measured the x - ray luminosity has been calculated using the relations : + @xmath177 @xmath178 where @xmath179 is the luminosity in the 0.1 - 2.4 kev band , @xmath180 is the correction for redshifting of the radiation , and @xmath181 is the luminosity distance . k has been calculated for ranges of redshift between 0.025 and 0.5 , and of icm temperature between 0.05 and 10 kev . the resulting matrix was used to convert energy flux into luminosity . measured cluster temperatures have been taken from the compilation in table 1 of white et al . ( 1997 ) . where measured temperatures have not been found we have used the luminosity - temperature correlation derived by white et al . ( 1997 ) : + @xmath182 where @xmath183 is the x - ray luminosity in the 0.01 - 80 kev band and t is the temperature in kev . the assumed temperature was used to calculate a bolometric correction to the luminosity . for each source a cycle of iterations was performed in the flux and luminosity calculations , until the change in temperature fell below 1 percent . where neither redshift nor temperature has been measured , we have assumed a temperature of @xmath184 . the procedures described in sections 2 , 3 and 4 for searching the rass-2 data base for cluster candidates , selecting clusters from this sample and determining their x - ray characteristics , have resulted in the catalog of 186 clusters shown in table 3 . the following notes , listed by the column number in the table , augment the information given in the header to each column . + ( * 1 * ) rosat x - ray source name . + ( * 2 * ) right ascension ( h : m : s j2000 ) of the centroid ( gca ) of the cluster x - ray emission . + ( * 3 * ) declination ( d : m : s j2000 ) of the centroid ( gca ) of the cluster x - ray emission . + ( * 4 * ) count - rate in @xmath185 in the hard band ( @xmath43 ) , with error ( gca ) . + ( * 5 * ) x - ray hardness ratio , with error ( gca ) . + ( * 6 * ) total rosat survey exposure time for the cluster , in seconds . + ( * 7 * ) column density of interstellar atomic hydrogen at the cluster center , in units of @xmath186 . + ( * 8 * ) temperature of the cluster gas , derived by the procedure described in section 4 , in @xmath187 . the superscript @xmath188 indicates that no measurement was found , and the temperature was determined using an @xmath189 correlation . where no redshift was available a temperature of @xmath184 was assumed . + ( * 9 * ) energy flux from the cluster , with the absorption by galactic interstellar absorption removed . the units are @xmath190 in the @xmath1 band . + ( * 10 * ) x - ray luminosity of the cluster in its rest - frame , derived using the procedure described in section 4 . the units are @xmath191 in the energy band @xmath1 . we assume @xmath34 and @xmath35 . + ( * 11 * ) optical identification of the cluster . the meaning of the prefix to the identification and the appropriate reference are given in table 4 . for five sources identified as double clusters , the label dc has been appended to the identification . + ( * 12 * ) redshift of the cluster . + ( * 13 * ) label for the reference from which the redshift was obtained : + * 1 . * romer ( 1995 ) * 2 . * h. bhringer and l. guzzo 1999 , eso key project , private communication ) * 3 . * struble & rood ( 1999 ) * 4 . * katgert et al . ( 1996 ) * 5 . * quintana & ramirez ( 1995 ) * 6 . * fetisova et al . ( 1993 ) * 7 . * de grandi et al . ( 1999 ) * 8 . * h. andernach 1989,``a compilation of measured redshifts of abell clusters '' , unpublished , private communication * 9 . * crawford et al . ( 1995 ) * 10 . * huchra et al . ( 1999 ) * 11 . * shectman ( 1985 ) * 12 . * mazure et al . ( 1996 ) * 13 . * collins et al . ( 1995 ) * 14 . * dalton et al . ( 1997 ) * 15 . * de vaucouleurs et al . ( 1991 ) * 16 . * stocke et al . ( 1991 ) * 17 . * postman et al . ( 1992 ) * 18 . * abell , corwin , & olowin ( 1989 ) * 19 . * katgert et al . ( 1998 ) * 20 . * ebeling & maddox ( 1995 ) * 21 . * muriel , nicotra , & lambas ( 1995 ) * 22 . * shectman et al . ( 1996 ) * 23 . * lauberts & valentijn ( 1989 ) * 24 . * da costa et al . ( 1998 ) * 25 . * dalton , efstathiou , & sutherland ( 1994 ) * 26 . * di nella et al . ( 1996 ) * 27 . * ratcliffe et al . ( 1998 ) * 28 . * given in ned , reference uncertain . + ( * 14 * ) number of galaxy redshifts used in deriving the cluster redshift . + ccc a & abell catalog & abell et al . ( 1989 ) + s & abell catalog : southern supplementary clusters & abell et al . ( 1989 ) + am & cambridge apm catalog & ned : arp & madore ( 1987 ) + apmcc & cambridge apm cluster catalog & dalton et al . ( 1997 ) + cid & efar survey & barton et al . ( 1996 ) + edcc & edinburgh - durham cluster catalog & lumsden et al . ( 1992 ) + emss & einstein medium sensitivity survey & stocke et al . ( 1991 ) + eso & european southern observatory & no reference in ned + hcg & hickson compact group catalog & hickson ( 1982 ) , barton et al . ( 1996 ) + scg & catalog of cosmos southern compact groups & prandoni , iovino & macgillivray ( 1994 ) + ngc & cluster dominated by ngc galaxy & ned + sh & cluster catalog from shane - wirtanen galaxy counts & shectman ( 1985 ) + images of these clusters , showing overlays of the hard band x - ray contours upon optical images reconstructed from the cosmos digital data base , are accessible over the internet at ( http://wave.xray.mpe.mpg.de/publications/papers/2001/rass-sgp-clusters/ xray - optical - images ) . they comprise 134 abell clusters , 15 clusters found in other catalogs , and 37 newly discovered clusters . the number of abell clusters in the sgp survey area is 1215 , including 332 southern supplementary clusters , therefore the abell clusters in the sgp catalog ( table 3 ) comprise 11.0 percent of all abell clusters in the sgp survey area . the abell fraction of the sgp cluster sample ( 72% ) is in good agreement with that of the bcs ( ebeling et al . 1999 , 2000 ) . we have compared the catalog in table 3 with the reflex catalog of bright clusters published by de grandi et al . ( 1999 ) , which contains 54 clusters lying in the sgp region . applying their energy flux threshold of @xmath192 in the @xmath1 band to table 3 , we find all but one cluster from the list of de grandi et al . the exception is a3866 , which we have rejected tentatively as a source whose x - ray flux may be dominated by an agn ( section 3.5.2 ) . however table 3 contains 20 clusters above this threshold , which are not in the list of de grandi et al . the reason is that these sources were not in the rass-1 source list , but were found by the rass-2 analysis as a consequence of the improvements , in particular lowering source detection thresholds and searching for sources in the hard energy band , which are described in section 3.1 and by voges et al . these 20 sources are ngc 720 , ngc 1132 , five newly discovered clusters , sh518 , and the abell clusters 194 , 2410 , 2442 , 2474 , 2496 , 2554 , 2556 , 2566 , 3984 , 4010 , 4068 and s1136 . the sgp catalog contains 113 clusters having fluxes below the threshold of the de grandi et al . ( 1999 ) study . the log n - log s distribution for the sgp cluster sample is shown in figure [ f12 ] , where it is compared with the results of other surveys . to avoid any errors caused by converting hard band ( @xmath43 ) fluxes in these surveys to broad band ( @xmath1 ) fluxes , we have made this comparison in the hard band . the circular symbols ( @xmath193 ) are the result of the survey of clusters by de grandi et al . ( 1999 ) , who reanalysed clusters detected in the rass-1 data base over a @xmath23 area of the southern sky and made first use of redshifts obtained from the eso key project . figure [ f12 ] includes also one point from the heao-1 a-2 cluster survey ( piccinotti et al . 1982 ) , the fit to the log n - log s curve obtained by ebeling et al . ( 1998 ) from the rosat brightest cluster sample ( bcs ) , and a box setting limits at low fluxes , derived from an analysis of emss results ( rosati et al . 1995 ) . there are significant differences among these results at energy fluxes less than @xmath194 . there is a flattening of the sgp log n - log s distribution at energy fluxes less than about @xmath195 , equivalent to a flux of @xmath26 in the rosat broad band ( @xmath1 ) , which is the completeness limit derived in section 6 . applying this limit we obtain a sample of 112 clusters , of which 110 have measured redshifts . the sources of the incompleteness of the sgp catalog at low fluxes have been discussed in section 3.5.5 . in addition there is a steepening of the sgp log n - log s curve over a short range of hard band flux near @xmath196 , a characteristic evident to a lesser extent also in the results of de grandi et al . this results in the distribution being higher than the fit of ebeling et al . ( 1998 ) and being at the upper limit set by rosati et al . ( 1995 ) , within the range @xmath197 . this may be a statistical fluctuation , but as we show in section 7 , there is significant large - scale structure in the sgp field out to a redshift of @xmath33 , which may be one cause of this feature in the sgp log n - log s distribution ( figure [ f12 ] ) . the optical observing program and a search of the literature yielded redshifts for 157 of the 186 clusters in table 3 . the distribution of the clusters in redshift space is summarised in the wedge diagram shown in figure [ f13 ] , in which the clusters are projected onto a plane whose co - ordinates are cluster redshift and right ascension . in this figure the symbol size is a measure of the cluster x - ray luminosity in the @xmath1 band . table 3 contains five sources , labelled dc in column 11 , for which the x - ray and optical data provide compelling evidence that they are interacting double clusters . in contrast the pair of objects rxcj0108.8 - 1524 and rxcj0108.9 - 1537 , which in projection are close , do not constitute a double cluster as they are well separated in redshift space . the former is a151 , which has a redshift of 0.0537 ( h. andernach 1989 , unpublished , private communication ) , whereas spectroscopic observation of the latter yield two redshifts which tie the galaxies to a151 but nine having a mean of @xmath198 ( katgert et al . 1996 , 1998 ) . in section 3.5.5 it was estimated from a comparison of the number of clusters detected in the sgp with the csearch predictions , that the sample completeness was 0.79 , and it was concluded that the missing ones were mainly distant clusters of small angular extent . the effect is to flatten the log n - log s distribution at low fluxes ( figure [ f12 ] ) , and using the following arguments we have established that the sample is essentially complete at fluxes greater than @xmath2 . first , we compare our log n - log s distribution with the results of deeper surveys , and of the wider field reflex and bcs surveys . at @xmath2 in the sgp distribution ( figure [ f12 ] ) we obtain @xmath199 . for deeper surveys , which have smaller fields and therefore limited statistics at this flux , we obtain @xmath200 ( rosati et al . 1998 ) , @xmath201 ( vikhlinen et al . 1998 ) , @xmath202 ( henry et al . 2001 ) , and @xmath203 ( gioia et al . 2001 ) . for the reflex survey we obtain @xmath204 ( bhringer et al . 2001 ) and for the bcs survey @xmath205 ( ebeling et al . we find no evidence that the sgp result is inconsistent with these surveys at this flux threshold . second , we apply a standard measure of the formal completeness of a sample , namely the @xmath206 test ( e.g. , schmidt 1968 , avni & bahcall 1980 ) . for the computation of the maximum volume @xmath207 the effective area , the local variation of the x - ray flux limit ( both for a minimum of 10 source counts ) , and the @xmath180 correction ( see section 4 ) are taken into account . the test is performed for subsamples with different x - ray flux limits . the mean of the @xmath206 values and their @xmath208 standard deviations are plotted in figure [ f14 ] . note that the errors do not include cosmic variance . below @xmath209 the deviations from the ideal value of 0.5 are significant , indicating that the sample gets definitively incomplete below this flux limit . between @xmath210 and @xmath211 it is difficult to make a definite statement about significant deviations from the 0.5 line because the large scale inhomogeneities in the spatial distribution of the clusters ( see section 7 ) start to modulate the averaged @xmath206 values . note also that the measurements at different flux limits are not statistically independent . a good estimate of the flux completeness limit is @xmath212 , because for fluxes brighter than this limit the averaged @xmath206 values are all within the 90 percent confidence range ( note that cosmic variance increase the given formal errors ) . third , we examine the behavior of the radially averaged comoving cluster number density along the redshift direction . if we assume that within the tested redshift range no large evolutionary effects are present , one would expect an almost constant cluster number density profile with superposed large - scale inhomogeneities . figure [ f15 ] shows the superposition of a set of cluster number density profiles obtained from 10 volume - limited subsamples within the luminosity range @xmath213 to @xmath214 . outside this luminosity interval the sizes of the subsamples are smaller than 10 and are thus dominated by small - number statistics . the subsamples are restricted to clusters with at least 10 source counts and x - ray fluxes larger than @xmath215 , as obtained from the @xmath206 test mentioned above . the effective survey area covered by each subsample is taken into account . the individual density profiles are normalized using the average cluster number density estimated for each subsample . the bars in figure [ f15 ] represent the formal @xmath216 poisson errors , within which no systematic large - scale gradients of the number density are found for @xmath217 . the comparatively large high - density region found in the redshift interval @xmath218 is composed mainly of several superclusters . a more detailed analysis of the large - scale structure is given in section 7 . finally , we have verified that the variation of rass exposure time in the sgp field ( figure [ f1 ] ) has little effect on the effective area at a flux level of @xmath2 . at the detection threshold of the gca ( 10 source counts ) , this area is 98 percent of the total area of the field . the wedge diagram for the sgp cluster sample ( figure [ f13 ] ) reveals that the spatial density of clusters at redshifts greater than @xmath3 is too low for the purpose of tracing large - scale structure , and we concentrate the discussion on clusters within this limit . a detailed examination of large - scale structure in the southern sky was made by tully et al . ( 1992 ) , who analysed the abell , corwin & olowin ( 1989 ) catalog of clusters . in this study measured redshifts were complemented by estimates based on the magnitudes of the third and tenth brightest galaxies , having an accuracy of @xmath219 out to redshifts of about @xmath220 ( zamorani et al . we have condensed the results into a sky map of the centroids of superclusters identified in the sgp region ( figure [ f16 ] ) . another wedge diagram ( figure [ f17 ] ) shows the distribution of these superclusters in redshift space . . [ f16 ] the dotted line in figure [ f16 ] traces the supergalactic equator , defined by the plane of a disk - like structure , the local supercluster , identified by de vaucouleurs & de vaucouleurs ( 1964 ) using measurements of the radial velocities of a large sample of local galaxies . the maximum values of these velocities were around @xmath221 ( @xmath222 ) . tully et al . ( 1992 ) have presented persuasive evidence that the pisces - cetus supercluster is likewise a flattened structure extending along the supergalactic equator , which is an extension of the local supercluster out to redshifts of at least @xmath223 . this idea is supported by our x - ray survey of clusters in the sgp . figure [ f18 ] is a sky map of all clusters in the sgp catalog ( table 3 ) having a redshift of less than @xmath224 , which shows clearly a concentration of clusters around the supergalactic equator ( figure [ f16 ] ) . of the 36 clusters identified by tully ( 1987 ) as members of the pisces - cetus supercluster , the following seven appear in table 3 and have a redshift @xmath225 : a14 , a85 , a119 , a133 , a147 , a151 , and a168 . the six brightest clusters in figure [ f18 ] , having hard - band x - ray count rates greater then @xmath226 , lie close to the supergalactic equator . five of these clusters , a85 , a119 , a133 , a4059 and s1101 , have redshifts between @xmath227 and @xmath228 , consistent with their being members of the pisces - cetus supercluster . the fifth , a4038 , is nearer at a redshift of @xmath229 , placing it at the edge of the local supercluster . the pisces - cetus supercluster is evident also in the wedge diagram ( figure [ f13 ] ) , in which the group of x - ray clusters at @xmath230 and @xmath231 is close to the location of the supercluster center . more distant structures are difficult to identify in the x - ray survey . tully et al . ( 1992 ) identified a structure orthogonal to the supergalactic equator , which includes the superclusters aquarius a and b , aquarius - capricornus , and sculptor a and b. the location of this structure , which extends from @xmath231 to @xmath232 ( @xmath233 ) , may be traced in figures [ f16 ] and [ f17 ] . to search for evidence of this structure in the x - ray data , we have constructed a sky map ( figure [ f19 ] ) which includes only x - ray clusters in the range @xmath234 . the map shows an elongated feature in the nw quadrant , which is perpendicular to the supergalactic equator . the argument that this feature traces the structure evident in the findings of of tully et al . ( 1992 ) is supported by two observations . first , the group of x - ray clusters in the nw corner of figure [ f19 ] belongs to the aquarius - capricornus supercluster . a correlation in sky position is evident upon comparing figures [ f19 ] and [ f16 ] , and a correlation in redshift space is seen upon comparing figures [ f13 ] and [ f17 ] . second , the two bright clusters a2597 and a2670 , highlighted as black circles in the nw quadrant , were identified by tully ( 1987 ) as members of the aquarius supercluster . batuski et al . ( 1999 ) have performed redshift measurements recently which establish that aquarius a and b are essentially one filamentary structure almost aligned with the line - of - sight between @xmath235 and @xmath236 . this concentration of abell clusters on the sky near @xmath237 , @xmath238 ( batuski et al . 1999 ) is not evident in the x - ray data ( figure [ f19 ] ) . however , care is needed in interpreting this result as it may be biased by the relatively low exposure time in this part of the rass ( figure [ f1 ] ) . therefore we conclude that , at least for redshifts out to @xmath33 , there is significant large - scale structure in the sgp field . however , there is one part of this structure which is not strongly evident in the x - ray maps shown in figure [ f18 ] and figure [ f19 ] . this is the horologium - reticulum supercluster ( tully et al . 1992 ) , a rich association of clusters having its centroid at @xmath239 and located at the position shown in figure [ f16 ] . there is only one bright x - ray cluster in our survey , a3113 at ( @xmath240 , figure [ f19 ] ) and @xmath241 , which may be associated with this supercluster . we can not rule out the possibility that the supercluster is inconspicuous because of its location close to the boundary of the sgp survey region . a systematic search of the rosat all - sky survey for clusters of galaxies has been performed in an area of @xmath242 centered on the south galactic pole . the search was made by correlating the list of rass sources detected in the hard x - ray band ( @xmath43 ) with the projected surface density of galaxies derived from the cosmos digitised uk schmidt iiia - j survey of the southern sky . the analysis yielded a list of 3236 candidates , of which @xmath243 should be chance associations with non - cluster sources , mainly agn and stars , and which should be 90 percent complete in containing clusters . the study was bounded during x - ray analysis by applying a lower limit of @xmath42 to the count - rate in the hard band , yielding a list of 477 candidates . non - cluster sources were removed by applying tests using the source x - ray extent and hardness ratio , by scrutiny of cosmos finding charts and overlays of the rass and cosmos images , and by correlation with such catalogs as the nasa extragalactic ( ned ) , simbad , tycho and veron data bases . this was performed in as objective a manner as possible , requiring an iterative sequence of procedures . the search resulted in 186 clusters , comprising 134 abell clusters , 15 clusters found in other catalogs , and 37 newly discovered clusters . the catalog shown in table 3 , and the overlays of the rass hard x - ray and cosmos optical images , are accessible over the internet ( http://wave.xray.mpe.mpg.de / publications / papers/2001/rass - sgp - clusters / xray- optical - images ) . the catalog has a minimum energy flux of @xmath244 in the band @xmath1 . tests show that a sample of 112 clusters , obtained when a flux limit of @xmath2 is applied , is essentially complete . we estimate the completeness of the overall catalog at a flux limit of @xmath0 to be @xmath245 . in support of studies of cluster evolution and large - scale structure using the results of the survey , a series of optical observing campaigns at the aat and at saao was conducted to obtain cluster redshifts . in addition we have used a number of redshifts obtained in programs at eso in support of the reflex project . using these campaigns and an extensive search of the literature we have obtained redshifts for 157 of the clusters in the catalog ( table 3 ) . redshifts are available for 110 of the 112 clusters in the complete flux - limited sample . examination of the spatial distribution of the sgp x - ray cluster sample corroborates earlier studies of large - scale structure , which were based on optical observations ( de vaucouleurs & de vaucouleurs 1964 , tully et al . the basic features are a flattened structure in the supergalactic plane , reaching out to @xmath246 and embracing the pisces - cetus supercluster , and an orthogonal structure at @xmath247 which includes the aquarius , aquarius - capricornus and sculptor a and b superclusters . we thank prof . trmper and the rosat team for the unstinting support , the myriad valuable discussions , the access to the rass data base , the use of the rass and exsas software , and the use of the powerful computing system under joachim paul and his team , which have made this work possible . the rosat project is supported by the bildungsministerium fr bildung und forschung ( bmbf / dlr ) and the max - planck - gesellschaft ( mpg ) . in equal measure we thank the royal observatory edinburgh and the naval research laboratory ( nrl ) for the intensive effort that went into the creation of the cosmos digitised optical data base and its installation at mpe , which was an essential factor in identifying clusters in the rass data base . our gratitude goes also to the anglo - australian telescope , the south african astronomical observatory and the european southern observatory for the expert assistance provided to the optical observations crucial to this project . we thank the reflex project for its cooperation in exchanging redshifts , and in particular luigi guzzo of the osservatorio astronomica di brera for his analysis of those eso key project observations , which yielded 14 redshifts used in this study . finally , this research has been supported by the office of naval research and nrl , and by the national aeronautics and space administration through an astrophysics data program grant ( s57759-f ) . abell , g. o. , corwin jr . , h. g. , & olowin , r. p. 1989 , apjs , 70 , 1 + arp , h. c. , & madore , b. f. 1987 , `` a catalogue of peculiar galaxies and associations + ( cambridge : cambridge university press ) + avni , y. & bahcall , j.n . 1980 , apj , 235 , 694 + barton , e. , geller , m. j. , ramella , m. , marzke , r. o. , & da costa , l. n. 1996 , aj , 112 , + 871 + batuski , d. j. , miller , c. j. , slinglend , k. a. , balkowski , c. , maurogordato , s. , + cayatte , v. , felenbok , p. , & olowin , r. 1999 , apj , 520 , 491 + bhringer , h. , et al . 2000 , apjs , 129 , 435 + bhringer , h. , et al . 2001 , a&a , 369 , 826 + caretta , c. a. , maia , m. a. g. , & willmer , c. n. a. 2000 , aj , 119 , 524 + cavaliere , a. , & fusco - femiano , r. 1976 , a&a , 49 , 137 + collins , c. a. , guzzo , l. , nichol , r. c. , & lumsden , s l. 1995 , mnras , 274 , 1071 + collins , c. a. , burke , d. a. , romer , a.k . , sharples , r. m. , & nichol , r. c. 1997 , apj , + 479 , l117 + collins , c. a. , et al . 2000 , mnras , 319 , 939 + crawford , c. s. , edge a. c. , fabian , a. c. , allen , s. w. , boehringer , h. , ebeling , h. , + mcmahon , r. g. & voges , w. 1995 , mnras , 274 , 75 + da costa , l. n. , et al . 1998 , aj , 116 , 1 + dalton , g. b. , efstathiou , g. & sutherland , w. j. 1994 , mnras , 269 , 151 + dalton , g. b. , maddox , s. j. , sutherland , w. j. , & efstathiou , g. 1997 , mnras , 289 , 263 + de grandi , s. , molendi , s. , bhringer , h. , & voges , w. 1997 , apj , 486 , 738 + de grandi , s. , et al . 1999 , apj , 514 , 148 + de vaucouleurs , g. , & de vaucouleurs , a. 1964 , first reference catalogue of bright + galaxies ( austin , university of texas press ) + de vaucouleurs , g. , de vaucouleurs , a. , corwin , h. , buta , r. , paturel , g. & fouque , p. + 1991 , third reference catalogue of bright galaxies ( springer - verlag : new york ) + di nella , h. , couch , w. j. , paturel , g. , & parker , q. a. 1996 , mnras , 283 , 367 + dickey , j. m. , & lockman , f. j. 1990 , ann . astrophys . , 28 , 215 + ebeling , h. , & wiedemann , g. 1993 , phys . e , 47 , 704 + ebeling , h. , & maddox , s. j. 1995 , mnras , 275 , 1155 + ebeling , h. , voges , w. , bhringer , h. , edge , a. c. , huchra , j. p. , & briel , u. g. 1996 , + mnras , 281 , 799 + ebeling , h. , edge , a. c. , bhringer , h. , allen , s. w. , crawford , c. s. , fabian , a. c. , + voges , w. , & huchra , j. p. 1998 , mnras , 301 , 881 + ebeling , h. , edge , a. c. , allen , s. w. , crawford , c. s. , fabian , a. c. , & huchra , j. r. + 2000 , mnras , 318 , 333 + edge , a. c. , stewart , g. c. , fabian , a. c. , & arnaud , k. a. 1990 , mnras , 245 , 559 + fetisova , t. s. , kuznetsov , d. yu . , lipovetski , v. a. , starobinski , a. a. , & olovin , r. p. + 1993 , astronomy letters , 19 , 198 + gioia , i. m. , henry , j. p. , mullis , c. r. , voges , w. , briel , u. g. , bhringer , h. & + huchra , j. p. 2001 , apj , 553 , l105 + henry , j.p . , gioia , i. m. , maccacaro , t. , morris , s. l. , stocke , j. t. , & wolter , a. 1992 , + apj , 386 , 408 + henry , j. p , gioia , i. m. , mullis , c. r. , voges , w. , briel , u. g. , bhringer , h. & + huchra , j. p. 2001 , apj , 553 , l109 + heydon - dumbleton , n. h. , collins , c. a. , & macgillivray , h. t. 1989 , mnras , 238 , 379 + hickson , p. 1982 , apj , 255 , 382 + hg , e. , kuzmin , a. , bastian , u. , fabricius , c. , kuimov , k. , lindegren , l. , + makarov , v. v. , & rser , s. 1998 , a&a , 335 , l65 + huchra , j. p. , vogeley , m. s. & geller , m. j. 1999 , apjs . 121 , 287 + katgert , p. , et al . 1996 , a&a , 310 , 8 + katgert , p. , mazure , a. , den hartog , r. , adami , c. , biviano , a. , & perea , j. 1998 , a&as , + 129 , 399 + kowalski , m. p. , ulmer , m. p. , cruddace , r. g. , & wood , k. s. 1984 , apjs , 286 , 822 + jones , l. r. , scharf , c. , ebeling , h. , perlman , e. , wegner , g. , malkan , m. , & horner , d. + 1998 , apj , 495 , 100 + lauberts , a. , & valentijn , e. 1989 , eso catalog , ' ' the surface photometry of the + eso - uppsala galaxies `` ( european southern observatory : garching ) + lumsden , s. l. , nichol , r. c. , collins , c. a. , & guzzo , l. 1992 , mnras , 258 , 1 + macgillivray , h. t. , & stobie , r. s. 1985 , vistas in astronomy , 27 , 433 + mazure , a. , et al . 1996 , a&a , 310 , 31 + mchardy , i. 1978 , mnras , 184 , 783 + mullis , c.r . , henry , j. p , gioia , i. m. , bhringer , h. , briel , u. g. , voges , w. + & huchra , j. p. 2000 , apj , 553 , l115 + muriel , h. , nicotra , m. a. , & lambas , d. g. 1995 , aj , 110 , 1032 + piccinotti , g. , mushotzky , r. f. , boldt , e. a. , holt , s. s. , marshall , f. e. , + serlemitsos , p. j. , & shafer , r. a. 1982 , apj , 253 , 485 + postman , m. , huchra , j. p. , & geller , m. j. 1992 , apj , 384 , 404 + prandoni , i. , iovino , a. , & macgillivray , h. t. 1994 , aj , 107 , 1235 + quintana , h. , & ramirez , a. 1995 , apjs , 96 , 343 + ratcliffe , a. , shanks , t. , parker , q. a. , broadbent , a. , watson , f. g. , oates , a. p. , + collins , c. a. , & fong , r. 1998 , mnras , 300 , 417 + raymond , j. c. , & smith , b. w. 1977 , apjs , 35 , 419 + romer , a. k. , collins , c. a. , bhringer , h. , cruddace , r. g. , ebeling , h. , + macgillivray , h. t. , & voges , w. 1994 , nature , 372 , 75 + romer , a. k. 1995 , doctoral thesis , university of edinburgh + romer , a. k. , et al . 2000 , apjs , 126 , 209 + rosati , p. , della ceca , r. , burg , r. , norman , c. , & giacconi , r. 1995 , apj , 445 , l11 + rosati , p. , della ceca , r. , norman , c. , & giacconi , r. 1998 , apj , 492 , l21 + schmidt , m. 1968 , apj , 151 , 393 + schwartz , d. a. 1978 , apj , 220 , 8 + shectman , s. a. 1985 , apjs , 57 , 77 + shectman , s. a. , landy , s. d. , oemler , a. , tucker , d. l. , lin , h. , kirschner , r. p. , + & schecter , l. p. 1996 , apj , 470,172 + schuecker , p. , et al . 2001 , a&a , 368 , 86 + stocke , j. t. , morris , s. m. , gioia , i. m. , maccacaro , t. , schild , r. , wolter , a. , + fleming , t. a. , & henry , j.p . 1991 , apjs , 76 , 813 + struble , m. f. , & rood , h. j. 1999 , apjs , 125 , 35 + trmper , j. 1983 , adv . space res . , 27 , 1404 + trmper , j. , et al . 1991 , nature , 349 , 579 + tucker , w. h. , tananbaum , h. , & remillard , r. a. 1995 , apj , 444 , 532 + tully , r. b. 1987 , apj , 323 , 1 + tully , r. b. , scaramella , r. , vettolani , g. , & zamorani , g. 1992 , apj , 388 , 9 + veron - cetty , m. p. , & veron , p. 1998 , eso scientific report 18 + vikhlinen , a. , mcnamara , b. r. , forman , w. , & jones , c. 1998 , apj , 502 , 558 + voges , w. , et al . 1999 , a&a , 349 , 389 + voges , w. , et al . 2000 , iau circular 7432 + voges , w. , henry , j. p , briel , u. g. , bhringer , h. , mullis , c. r. , gioia , i. m. & + huchra , j. p. 2001 , apj , 553 , l119 + white , d. a. , jones , c. , & forman , w. 1997 , mnras , 292 , 419 + yentis , d. j. , cruddace , r. g. , gursky , h. , stuart , b. v. , wallin , j. f. , + macgillivray , h. t. , & collins , c. a. 1992 , ' ' digitised optical sky surveys `` , ed . + h. t. macgillivray & e. b. thomson , ( netherlands : kluwer academic publishers ) , 67 + zamorani , g. , scaramella , r. , vettolani , g. , & chincarini , g. 1992 , in ' ' traces of primordial + structure in the universe , ed . h. bhringer & r. a. treumann , mpe report 227 + cccccccccccccc rxcj2201.8 - 2226 & 22 01 50.5 & -22 26 37 & [email protected] & [email protected] & 237 & 2.61 & 3.554@xmath249 & 5.75 & 1.193 & s987 & 0.0693 & 8 & 20 + rxcj2202.1 - 0949 & 22 02 07.2 & -09 49 48 & [email protected] & [email protected] & 307 & 4.20 & 4.039@xmath249 & 5.89 & 1.629 & a2410 & 0.0801 & 17 & 1 + rxcj2203.8 - 2130 & 22 03 50.6 & -21 30 31 & [email protected] & [email protected] & 227 & 2.45 & 2.809@xmath249 & 2.77 & 0.644 & & 0.0732 & 1 & 3 + rxcj2205.6 - 0535 & 22 05 39.6 & -05 35 29 & [email protected] & [email protected] & 191 & 4.68 & 3.800@xmath250 & 14.40 & 2.103 & a2415 & 0.0582 & 2 & 3 + rxcj2210.3 - 1210 & 22 10 20.0 & -12 10 33 & [email protected] & [email protected] & 278 & 3.92 & 6.000@xmath250 & 15.70 & 4.642 & a2420 & 0.0831 & 1 & 3 + rxcj2213.0 - 2753 & 22 13 05.0 & -27 53 56 & [email protected] & [email protected] & 205 & 1.40 & 3.760@xmath249 & 8.28 & 1.373 & & 0.0620 & 1 & 2 + rxcj2214.4 - 1701 & 22 14 26.3 & -17 01 24 & [email protected] & [email protected] & 305 & 2.61 & 5.845@xmath249 & 4.02 & 4.016 & a3847 & 0.1530 & 3 & 1 + rxcj2214.5 - 1022 & 22 14 32.4 & -10 22 12 & [email protected] & [email protected] & 280 & 3.84 & 6.578@xmath249 & 12.50 & 5.343 & a2426 & 0.1001 & 1 & 4 + rxcj2216.2 - 0920 & 22 16 15.2 & -09 20 18 & [email protected] & [email protected] & 274 & 5.24 & 4.869@xmath249 & 8.78 & 2.567 & a2428 & 0.0825 & 1 & 2 + rxcj2216.9 - 1725 & 22 16 56.4 & -17 25 30 & [email protected] & [email protected] & 277 & 2.28 & 6.969@xmath249 & 8.56 & 6.163 & & 0.1301 & 1 & 2 + rxcj2217.7 - 3543 & 22 17 43.7 & -35 43 32 & [email protected] & [email protected] & 319 & 1.10 & 6.865@xmath249 & 6.42 & 5.929 & a3854 & 0.1474 & 13 & 9 + rxcj2218.2 - 0350 & 22 18 17.1 & -03 50 01 & [email protected] & [email protected] & 273 & 5.73 & 5.375@xmath249 & 9.39 & 3.267 & ms2215.7 - 0404 dc & 0.0901 & 1 & 3 + rxcj2218.6 - 3853 & 22 18 40.3 & -38 53 48 & [email protected] & [email protected] & 314 & 1.33 & 7.246@xmath249 & 8.35 & 6.746 & eso 344-g 019 & 0.1379 & 28 & ? + rxcj2218.8 - 0258 & 22 18 49.0 & -02 58 07 & [email protected] & [email protected] & 268 & 5.84 & 5.350@xmath249 & 9.37 & 3.246 & & 0.0899 & 2 & 7 + rxcj2223.9 - 0137 & 22 23 56.7 & -01 37 44 & [email protected] & [email protected] & 224 & 5.34 & 9.000@xmath250 & 9.92 & 3.509 & a2440 & 0.0912 & 8 & 24 + rxcj2225.8 - 0636 & 22 25 50.8 & -06 36 09 & [email protected] & [email protected] & 251 & 5.14 & 4.196@xmath249 & 5.16 & 1.787 & a2442 & 0.0897 & 2 & 12 + rxcj2226.1 - 4745 & 22 26 10.6 & -47 45 01 & [email protected] & [email protected] & 329 & 1.44 & 3.289@xmath249 & 1.77 & 0.978 & a3876 & 0.1130 & 14 & ? + rxcj2227.4 - 4852 & 22 27 28.3 & -48 52 54 & [email protected] & [email protected] & 367 & 1.65 & 3.321@xmath249 & 2.47 & 1.004 & apmcc782 & 0.0970 & 14 & 3 + rxcj2227.8 - 3034 & 22 27 52.9 & -30 34 11 & [email protected] & [email protected] & 308 & 1.09 & 3.800@xmath250 & 10.10 & 1.415 & a3880 & 0.0570 & 13 & 11 + rxcj2231.2 - 3802 & 22 31 15.1 & -38 02 39 & [email protected] & [email protected] & 233 & 1.20 & 5.000@xmath249 & 1.71 & & & & & + rxcj2234.5 - 3744 & 22 34 30.4 & -37 44 05 & [email protected] & [email protected] & 241 & 1.22 & 7.900@xmath250 & 11.20 & 11.986 & a3888 & 0.1590 & 8 & 70 + rxcj2234.8 - 3033 & 22 34 53.5 & -30 33 56 & [email protected] & [email protected] & 305 & 1.11 & 6.983@xmath249 & 2.32 & 6.182 & a3889 & 0.2512 & 8 & 19 + rxcj2235.6 + 0128 & 22 35 40.6 & + 01 28 21 & [email protected] & [email protected] & 167 & 5.81 & 4.113@xmath249 & 11.20 & 1.702 & a2457 & 0.0594 & 3 & 18 + rxcj2239.2 - 1719 & 22 39 16.4 & -17 19 46 & [email protected] & [email protected] & 110 & 2.99 & 2.559@xmath249 & 2.05 & 0.503 & a2462 & 0.0751 & 17 & 1 + rxcj2241.9 - 4235 & 22 41 56.7 & -42 35 51 & [email protected] & [email protected] & 259 & 1.66 & 5.000@xmath249 & 1.68 & & a3902 & & & + rxcj2243.0 - 2010 & 22 43 05.1 & -20 10 34 & [email protected] & [email protected] & 185 & 2.60 & 5.892@xmath249 & 4.99 & 4.085 & a2474 & 0.1385 & 1 & 1 + rxcj2244.5 - 1744 & 22 44 34.9 & -17 44 21 & [email protected] & [email protected] & 151 & 2.79 & 4.361@xmath249 & 2.60 & 1.963 & a2478 & 0.1325 & 1 & 2 + rxcj2246.1 - 3600 & 22 46 11.8 & -36 00 22 & [email protected] & [email protected] & 260 & 1.14 & 2.290@xmath249 & 1.90 & 0.374 & & 0.0673 & 1 & 2 + rxcj2247.2 + 0204 & 22 47 15.2 & + 02 04 35 & [email protected] & [email protected] & 151 & 5.84 & 5.000@xmath249 & 3.70 & & & & & + rxcj2248.7 - 4431 & 22 48 43.4 & -44 31 41 & [email protected] & [email protected] & 208 & 1.79 & 11.946@xmath249 & 8.59 & 22.736 & s1063 & 0.2520 & 7 & ? + rxcj2249.2 - 3727 & 22 49 17.6 & -37 27 26 & [email protected] & [email protected] & 253 & 1.13 & 1.388@xmath249 & 2.66 & 0.096 & s1065 & 0.0289 & 23 & 2 + rxcj2250.8 - 4521 & 22 50 48.9 & -45 21 33 & [email protected] & [email protected] & 203 & 1.88 & 1.898@xmath249 & 1.99 & 0.226 & s1067 & 0.0511 & 21,22 & 6 + rxcj2251.0 - 1624 & 22 51 00.4 & -16 24 21 & [email protected] & [email protected] & 103 & 3.16 & 5.426@xmath249 & 5.24 & 3.342 & a2496 & 0.1221 & 1 & 3 + rxcj2253.5 - 3343 & 22 53 34.2 & -33 43 21 & [email protected] & [email protected] & 195 & 1.24 & 7.133@xmath249 & 3.04 & 6.504 & a3934 & 0.2250 & 8 & 6 + rxcj2305.5 - 4513 & 23 05 34.7 & -45 13 11 & [email protected] & [email protected] & 159 & 1.69 & 5.132@xmath249 & 4.34 & 2.919 & a3970 & 0.1253 & 1 & 3 + rxcj2306.8 - 1324 & 23 06 51.7 & -13 24 59 & [email protected] & [email protected] & 139 & 3.07 & 5.000@xmath249 & 4.10 & 0.765 & & 0.0659 & 2 & 2 + rxcj2307.2 - 1513 & 23 07 15.5 & -15 13 41 & [email protected] & [email protected] & 90 & 2.78 & 4.894@xmath249 & 4.92 & 2.599 & a2533 & 0.1110 & 5 & 1 + rxcj2308.3 - 0211 & 23 08 23.1 & -02 11 32 & [email protected] & [email protected] & 354 & 4.29 & 10.221@xmath249 & 4.26 & 15.544 & a2537 & 0.2966 & 1 & 2 + rxcj2312.2 - 2129 & 23 12 16.3 & -21 29 35 & [email protected] & [email protected] & 86 & 2.03 & 4.100@xmath250 & 6.65 & 3.532 & a2554 & 0.1111 & 3 & 28 + rxcj2313.0 - 2138 & 23 13 02.2 & -21 38 07 & [email protected] & [email protected] & 88 & 2.03 & 4.700@xmath250 & 5.43 & 1.746 & a2556 & 0.0865 & 3 & 2 + rxcj2313.9 - 4243 & 23 13 58.2 & -42 43 59 & [email protected] & [email protected] & 183 & 1.85 & 5.337@xmath249 & 23.50 & 3.211 & s1101 & 0.0564 & 1 & 4 + rxcj2315.7 - 3746 & 23 15 44.2 & -37 46 53 & [email protected] & [email protected] & 128 & 1.50 & 7.709@xmath249 & 5.82 & 7.852 & am 2312 - 380/a3984 & 0.1786 & 1 & 3 + rxcj2315.7 - 0222 & 23 15 46.0 & -02 22 38 & [email protected] & [email protected] & 337 & 4.18 & 2.024@xmath249 & 8.73 & 0.268 & ngc 7556 & 0.0267 & 1 & 2 + rxcj2316.1 - 2027 & 23 16 08.0 & -20 27 19 & [email protected] & [email protected] & 95 & 2.07 & 4.589@xmath249 & 7.43 & 2.222 & a2566 & 0.0834 & 1 & 2 + rxcj2321.4 - 2312 & 23 21 25.9 & -23 12 31 & [email protected] & [email protected] & 98 & 1.96 & 5.100@xmath250 & 3.26 & 4.883 & a2580 & 0.1870 & 16 & 1 + rxcj2321.5 - 4154 & 23 21 33.0 & -41 54 04 & [email protected] & [email protected] & 143 & 2.15 & 5.178@xmath249 & 8.80 & 2.983 & a3998 & 0.0889 & 1 & 2 + rxcj2325.3 - 1207 & 23 25 20.1 & -12 07 40 & [email protected] & [email protected] & 322 & 2.50 & 9.100@xmath250 & 20.60 & 6.365 & a2597 & 0.0852 & 8 & 3 + rxcj2326.2 - 2406 & 23 26 16.0 & -24 06 13 & [email protected] & [email protected] & 185 & 1.82 & 2.888@xmath249 & 2.06 & 0.692 & apmcc895 & 0.0880 & 14 & ? + rxcj2331.1 - 3630 & 23 31 11.3 & -36 30 22 & [email protected] & [email protected] & 51 & 1.44 & 6.005@xmath249 & 11.00 & 4.279 & a4010 & 0.0954 & 8 & 8 + rxcj2336.2 - 3135 & 23 36 14.9 & -31 35 55 & [email protected] & [email protected] & 125 & 1.18 & 3.712@xmath249 & 8.67 & 1.320 & s1136 & 0.0594 & 26,27 & 2 + rxcj2337.6 + 0016 & 23 37 40.9 & + 00 16 34 & [email protected] & [email protected] & 378 & 3.85 & 8.948@xmath249 & 3.56 & 11.264 & a2631 & 0.2753 & 6 & 1 + rxcj2338.2 - 4944 & 23 38 12.7 & -49 44 43 & [email protected] & [email protected] & 175 & 1.89 & 5.000@xmath249 & 1.87 & & & & & + rxcj2341.2 - 0901 & 23 41 17.3 & -09 01 34 & [email protected] & [email protected] & 346 & 2.55 & 8.182@xmath249 & 3.41 & 9.067 & a2645 & 0.2517 & 8 & 5 + rxcj2344.2 - 0422 & 23 44 16.2 & -04 22 07 & [email protected] & [email protected] & 335 & 3.54 & 4.691@xmath249 & 8.81 & 2.340 & & 0.0786 & 1 & 2 + rxcj2344.4 - 2153 & 23 44 28.9 & -21 53 34 & [email protected] & [email protected] & 198 & 1.88 & 3.603@xmath249 & 2.27 & 1.234 & a2655 & 0.1122 & 1 & 3 + rxcj2346.7 - 1028 & 23 46 42.4 & -10 28 11 & [email protected] & [email protected] & 340 & 2.78 & 5.872@xmath249 & 2.63 & 4.093 & a2661 & 0.1911 & 3 & 2 + rxcj2347.4 - 0218 & 23 47 24.5 & -02 18 49 & [email protected] & [email protected] & 343 & 3.62 & 1.197@xmath249 & 3.08 & 0.065 & hcg 97 & 0.0221 & 1 & 2 + rxcj2347.7 - 2808 & 23 47 43.2 & -28 08 32 & [email protected] & [email protected] & 310 & 1.55 & 4.250@xmath249 & 49.90 & 1.843 & a4038 & 0.0293 & 8 & 44 + rxcj2348.2 - 2849 & 23 48 13.0 & -28 49 01 & [email protected] & [email protected] & 309 & 1.45 & 6.077@xmath249 & 2.03 & 4.408 & a4041/s1151 dc & 0.2260 & 18 & ? + rxcj2350.1 - 0339 & 23 50 09.1 & -03 39 10 & [email protected] & [email protected] & 340 & 3.65 & 4.733@xmath249 & 2.60 & 2.399 & a2664 & 0.1466 & 6 & 2 + rxcj2351.6 - 2605 & 23 51 40.5 & -26 05 09 & [email protected] & [email protected] & 308 & 1.66 & 11.318@xmath249 & 9.29 & 19.901 & a2667 & 0.2264 & 1 & 1 + rxcj2354.2 - 1024 & 23 54 13.5 & -10 24 53 & [email protected] & [email protected] & 310 & 2.92 & 3.900@xmath250 & 9.62 & 2.403 & a2670 & 0.0761 & 8 & 220 + rxcj2355.1 - 2834 & 23 55 08.6 & -28 34 27 & [email protected] & [email protected] & 300 & 1.49 & 5.000@xmath249 & 1.61 & & a4054 & & & + rxcj2356.0 - 0129 & 23 56 02.4 & -01 29 43 & [email protected] & [email protected] & 367 & 3.58 & 5.000@xmath249 & 3.32 & & & & & + rxcj2357.0 - 3445 & 23 57 02.4 & -34 45 45 & [email protected] & [email protected] & 255 & 1.10 & 3.500@xmath250 & 32.60 & 3.404 & a4059 & 0.0492 & 1 & 2 + rxcj2359.9 - 3928 & 23 59 56.8 & -39 28 53 & [email protected] & [email protected] & 152 & 1.33 & 4.595@xmath249 & 5.03 & 2.229 & a4068 & 0.1016 & 8 & 2 + rxcj0000.4 - 0237 & 00 00 24.7 & -02 37 30 & [email protected] & [email protected] & 372 & 3.56 & 1.460@xmath249 & 1.77 & 0.110 & & 0.0379 & 24 & 1 + rxcj0001.6 - 1540 & 00 01 39.0 & -15 40 52 & [email protected] & [email protected] & 337 & 2.24 & 3.960@xmath249 & 2.32 & 1.552 & & 0.1246 & 1 & 3 + rxcj0003.1 - 3555 & 00 03 11.1 & -35 55 21 & [email protected] & [email protected] & 142 & 1.11 & 3.046@xmath249 & 7.70 & 0.799 & a2717 & 0.0490 & 3 & 56 + rxcj0003.2 - 0605 & 00 03 12.0 & -06 05 12 & [email protected] & [email protected] & 350 & 3.16 & 8.577@xmath249 & 4.50 & 10.167 & a2697 & 0.2320 & 2 & ? + rxcj0003.8 + 0203 & 00 03 50.9 & + 02 03 45 & [email protected] & [email protected] & 362 & 3.00 & 4.185@xmath249 & 4.18 & 1.776 & a2700 & 0.0994 & 1 & 2 + rxcj0006.0 - 3443 & 00 06 04.8 & -34 43 26 & [email protected] & [email protected] & 226 & 1.16 & 5.381@xmath249 & 5.86 & 3.276 & a2721 & 0.1143 & 8 & 72 + rxcj0007.4 - 2809 & 00 07 25.3 & -28 09 21 & [email protected] & [email protected] & 313 & 1.77 & 5.000@xmath249 & 2.04 & & a2726 & & & + rxcj0011.3 - 2851 & 00 11 19.5 & -28 51 41 & [email protected] & [email protected] & 254 & 1.84 & 4.426@xmath249 & 12.10 & 2.034 & a2734 & 0.0625 & 3 & 80 + rxcj0012.9 - 0853 & 00 12 54.7 & -08 53 03 & [email protected] & [email protected] & 336 & 3.32 & 5.000@xmath249 & 1.86 & & & & & + rxcj0013.6 - 1930 & 00 13 38.2 & -19 30 08 & [email protected] & [email protected] & 313 & 2.04 & 4.699@xmath249 & 6.09 & 2.355 & a13 & 0.0949 & 1 & 4 + rxcj0014.3 - 3022 & 00 14 20.1 & -30 22 33 & [email protected] & [email protected] & 122 & 1.65 & 11.184@xmath249 & 4.96 & 19.331 & a2744 & 0.3067 & 8 & 34 + rxcj0015.5 - 2346 & 00 15 31.8 & -23 46 13 & [email protected] & [email protected] & 277 & 2.45 & 2.814@xmath249 & 3.48 & 0.647 & a14 & 0.0655 & 3 & 9 + rxcj0016.3 - 3121 & 00 16 19.8 & -31 21 55 & [email protected] & [email protected] & 296 & 1.88 & 3.292@xmath249 & 3.50 & 0.981 & a2751 & 0.0805 & 20 & 1 + rxcj0017.5 - 3511 & 00 17 34.9 & -35 11 09 & [email protected] & [email protected] & 354 & 1.31 & 3.686@xmath249 & 3.22 & 1.304 & a2755 & 0.0969 & 8 & 18 + rxcj0019.0 - 2026 & 00 19 03.9 & -20 26 17 & [email protected] & [email protected] & 322 & 1.78 & 8.314@xmath249 & 2.93 & 9.432 & s26 & 0.2773 & 1 & 1 + rxcj0020.5 - 4913 & 00 20 34.1 & -49 13 40 & [email protected] & [email protected] & 151 & 2.12 & 2.620@xmath249 & 2.44 & 0.536 & a2764 & 0.0711 & 3 & 19 + rxcj0020.7 - 2542 & 00 20 43.3 & -25 42 53 & [email protected] & [email protected] & 281 & 2.26 & 6.360@xmath249 & 5.81 & 4.921 & a22 & 0.1410 & 3 & 3 + rxcj0024.0 - 1704 & 00 24 03.6 & -17 04 32 & [email protected] & [email protected] & 314 & 2.00 & 4.956@xmath249 & 1.75 & 2.680 & a2768 & 0.1890 & 1 & 2 + rxcj0025.5 - 3302 & 00 25 32.2 & -33 02 53 & [email protected] & [email protected] & 328 & 1.69 & 3.215@xmath249 & 9.00 & 0.921 & s41 & 0.0487 & 8 & 2 + rxcj0028.6 - 2338 & 00 28 39.5 & -23 38 27 & [email protected] & [email protected] & 294 & 1.82 & 4.933@xmath249 & 4.85 & 2.650 & a42 & 0.1129 & 8 & 5 + rxcj0030.6 - 2410 & 00 30 37.6 & -24 10 53 & [email protected] & [email protected] & 314 & 1.51 & 3.927@xmath249 & 1.84 & 1.516 & a47 & 0.1382 & 3 & 1 + rxcj0033.8 - 0750 & 00 33 51.6 & -07 50 29 & [email protected] & [email protected] & 270 & 3.50 & 5.000@xmath249 & 1.80 & & a56 & & & + rxcj0034.2 - 0204 & 00 34 13.9 & -02 04 31 & [email protected] & [email protected] & 597 & 2.82 & 4.763@xmath249 & 8.38 & 2.433 & sh518 & 0.0822 & 11 & 1 + rxcj0035.6 + 0138 & 00 35 36.3 & + 01 38 20 & [email protected] & [email protected] & 291 & 2.66 & 5.000@xmath249 & 2.13 & & & & & + rxcj0037.4 - 2831 & 00 37 27.0 & -28 31 52 & [email protected] & [email protected] & 326 & 1.73 & 3.387@xmath249 & 2.22 & 1.057 & a2798 & 0.1050 & 3 & 20 + rxcj0041.8 - 0918 & 00 41 50.0 & -09 18 12 & [email protected] & [email protected] & 328 & 3.58 & 6.200@xmath250 & 74.00 & 9.810 & a85 & 0.0556 & 12 & 116 + rxcj0042.1 - 2832 & 00 42 08.8 & -28 32 12 & [email protected] & [email protected] & 325 & 1.49 & 6.768@xmath249 & 9.82 & 5.726 & a2811 & 0.1170 & 8 & 32 + rxcj0043.5 - 0443 & 00 43 34.6 & -04 43 06 & [email protected] & [email protected] & 446 & 3.63 & 5.000@xmath249 & 2.48 & & & & & + rxcj0048.6 - 2114 & 00 48 38.0 & -21 14 50 & [email protected] & [email protected] & 339 & 1.52 & 2.759@xmath249 & 4.20 & 0.614 & a2824 & 0.0581 & 17 & 7 + rxcj0049.3 - 2931 & 00 49 23.8 & -29 31 27 & [email protected] & [email protected] & 323 & 1.80 & 5.172@xmath249 & 5.25 & 2.974 & s84 & 0.1150 & 8 & 20 + rxcj0051.1 - 4833 & 00 51 11.2 & -48 33 35 & [email protected] & [email protected] & 204 & 2.12 & 5.646@xmath249 & 2.46 & 3.684 & a2830 & 0.1873 & 1 & 2 + rxcj0051.3 - 2831 & 00 51 19.2 & -28 31 10 & [email protected] & [email protected] & 324 & 1.63 & 3.750@xmath249 & 2.49 & 1.359 & a2829 & 0.1125 & 13 & 6 + rxcj0056.0 - 3732 & 00 56 01.0 & -37 32 45 & [email protected] & [email protected] & 351 & 2.59 & 8.538@xmath249 & 8.65 & 10.102 & & 0.1663 & 2 & 11 + rxcj0056.3 - 0112 & 00 56 18.3 & -01 12 53 & [email protected] & [email protected] & 321 & 3.10 & 5.100@xmath250 & 33.70 & 2.855 & a119 & 0.0444 & 17 & 23 + rxcj0058.4 - 1425 & 00 58 28.2 & -14 25 39 & [email protected] & [email protected] & 492 & 1.87 & 3.105@xmath249 & 2.12 & 0.840 & a123 & 0.0957 & 5 & 2 + rxcj0102.7 - 2152 & 01 02 42.3 & -21 52 46 & [email protected] & [email protected] & 268 & 1.48 & 3.800@xmath250 & 18.90 & 2.574 & a133 & 0.0562 & 8 & 9 + rxcj0104.5 - 2400 & 01 04 35.0 & -24 00 00 & [email protected] & [email protected] & 335 & 1.61 & 4.672@xmath249 & 2.34 & 2.322 & a140 & 0.1520 & 8 & 12 + rxcj0105.5 - 2439 & 01 05 35.4 & -24 39 33 & [email protected] & [email protected] & 326 & 1.61 & 8.018@xmath249 & 3.88 & 8.635 & a141 & 0.2300 & 8 & 1 + rxcj0106.8 - 0229 & 01 06 51.5 & -02 29 18 & [email protected] & [email protected] & 423 & 4.10 & 6.386@xmath249 & 3.21 & 4.972 & a145 & 0.1909 & 5 & 1 + rxcj0107.8 - 3643 & 01 07 49.4 & -36 43 44 & [email protected] & [email protected] & 378 & 1.94 & 4.642@xmath249 & 3.57 & 2.285 & a2871 & 0.1221 & 2 & 11 + rxcj0108.2 + 0210 & 01 08 12.8 & + 02 10 48 & [email protected] & [email protected] & 415 & 3.01 & 2.342@xmath249 & 4.60 & 0.398 & a147 & 0.0447 & 3 & 11 + rxcj0108.5 - 4021 & 01 08 33.2 & -40 21 00 & [email protected] & [email protected] & 377 & 3.04 & 4.898@xmath249 & 3.07 & 2.610 & a2874 & 0.1408 & 13 & 6 + rxcj0108.8 - 1524 & 01 08 49.3 & -15 24 30 & [email protected] & [email protected] & 446 & 1.69 & 3.149@xmath249 & 7.00 & 0.872 & a151 & 0.0537 & 8 & 37 + rxcj0108.9 - 1537 & 01 08 55.5 & -15 37 42 & [email protected] & [email protected] & 437 & 1.69 & 3.954@xmath249 & 3.72 & 1.541 & & 0.0981 & 4,19 & 9 + rxcj0110.0 - 4555 & 01 10 00.7 & -45 55 24 & [email protected] & [email protected] & 301 & 2.10 & 3.500@xmath250 & 15.00 & 0.404 & a2877 & 0.0250 & 8 & 109 + rxcj0113.9 - 3145 & 01 13 54.2 & -31 45 07 & [email protected] & [email protected] & 333 & 2.40 & 1.000@xmath249 & 1.21 & 0.018 & s141 & 0.0184 & 8 & 18 + rxcj0114.7 - 2118 & 01 14 47.3 & -21 18 02 & [email protected] & [email protected] & 346 & 1.49 & 5.000@xmath249 & 1.61 & & & & & + rxcj0114.9 + 0024 & 01 14 57.5 & + 00 24 20 & [email protected] & [email protected] & 406 & 3.32 & 2.600@xmath250 & 10.60 & 1.043 & a168 & 0.0477 & 1 & 2 + rxcj0116.1 - 1555 & 01 16 11.8 & -15 55 24 & [email protected] & [email protected] & 394 & 1.69 & 1.862@xmath249 & 2.46 & 0.214 & scg 16 & 0.0448 & 1 & 2 + rxcj0118.1 - 2658 & 01 18 10.2 & -26 58 18 & [email protected] & [email protected] & 366 & 1.47 & 7.987@xmath249 & 3.81 & 8.554 & a2895 & 0.2310 & 1 & 1 + rxcj0120.9 - 1351 & 01 20 57.9 & -13 51 19 & [email protected] & [email protected] & 344 & 1.73 & 3.240@xmath249 & 8.33 & 0.939 & cid 10 & 0.0511 & 1 & 3 + rxcj0121.8 - 2022 & 01 21 48.1 & -20 22 34 & [email protected] & [email protected] & 465 & 1.45 & 5.000@xmath249 & 2.16 & & a2902 & & & + rxcj0122.2 - 2131 & 01 22 12.4 & -21 31 04 & [email protected] & [email protected] & 494 & 1.39 & 5.000@xmath249 & 1.90 & & a185 & & & + rxcj0122.9 - 1245 & 01 22 55.1 & -12 45 50 & [email protected] & [email protected] & 391 & 1.68 & 3.598@xmath249 & 1.88 & 1.229 & a188 & 0.1230 & 3 & 2 + rxcj0125.4 + 0145 & 01 25 29.9 & + 01 45 46 & [email protected] & [email protected] & 413 & 3.08 & 1.446@xmath249 & 8.03 & 0.107 & ngc 533 & 0.0176 & 2 & 4 + rxcj0125.6 - 0125 & 01 25 38.0 & -01 25 03 & [email protected] & [email protected] & 431 & 3.56 & 1.900@xmath250 & 12.20 & 0.176 & a194 & 0.0183 & 8 & 81 + rxcj0126.0 - 3758 & 01 26 04.6 & -37 58 36 & [email protected] & [email protected] & 351 & 1.68 & 2.703@xmath249 & 2.04 & 0.581 & a2911 & 0.0810 & 4 & 31 + rxcj0126.7 - 1810 & 01 26 44.4 & -18 10 20 & [email protected] & [email protected] & 328 & 1.62 & 5.000@xmath249 & 2.03 & & a197 & & & + rxcj0127.2 - 1746 & 01 27 13.9 & -17 46 17 & [email protected] & [email protected] & 351 & 1.52 & 4.358@xmath249 & 2.14 & 1.960 & a199 & 0.1459 & 1 & 2 + rxcj0131.7 + 0033 & 01 31 42.4 & + 00 33 43 & [email protected] & [email protected] & 432 & 2.92 & 2.535@xmath249 & 1.77 & 0.490 & a208 & 0.0798 & 3 & ? + rxcj0131.8 - 1336 & 01 31 53.5 & -13 36 27 & [email protected] & [email protected] & 453 & 2.27 & 8.513@xmath249 & 5.59 & 9.982 & a209 & 0.2060 & 3 & 2 + rxcj0137.2 - 0912 & 01 37 15.3 & -09 12 10 & [email protected] & [email protected] & 444 & 2.75 & 2.672@xmath249 & 8.50 & 0.564 & & 0.0392 & 1 & 3 + rxcj0137.4 - 1259 & 01 37 29.2 & -12 59 10 & [email protected] & [email protected] & 458 & 2.45 & 5.503@xmath249 & 1.78 & 3.462 & a222 & 0.2134 & 8 & 6 + rxcj0137.9 - 1248 & 01 37 56.4 & -12 48 01 & [email protected] & [email protected] & 454 & 1.84 & 5.935@xmath249 & 2.28 & 4.160 & a223 & 0.2070 & 8 & 4 + rxcj0139.1 - 1915 & 01 39 10.1 & -19 15 34 & [email protected] & [email protected] & 479 & 1.45 & 5.000@xmath249 & 1.63 & & & & & + rxcj0139.9 - 0555 & 01 39 59.7 & -05 55 23 & [email protected] & [email protected] & 441 & 2.85 & 5.000@xmath249 & 1.71 & & & & & + rxcj0143.4 - 4614 & 01 43 29.8 & -46 14 20 & [email protected] & [email protected] & 455 & 2.30 & 5.000@xmath249 & 1.65 & & a2937 & & & + rxcj0144.6 - 2213 & 01 44 41.8 & -22 13 43 & [email protected] & [email protected] & 494 & 1.18 & 6.991@xmath249 & 1.90 & 6.196 & a2938 & 0.2781 & 1 & 1 + rxcj0148.2 - 3155 & 01 48 14.8 & -31 55 08 & [email protected] & [email protected] & 521 & 1.53 & 3.400@xmath250 & 2.05 & & a2943 & & & + rxcj0148.3 - 0406 & 01 48 22.2 & -04 06 13 & [email protected] & [email protected] & 255 & 2.59 & 5.000@xmath249 & 2.10 & & & & & + rxcj0152.5 - 2853 & 01 52 32.8 & -28 53 32 & [email protected] & [email protected] & 391 & 1.51 & 5.000@xmath249 & 1.65 & & & & & + rxcj0152.7 + 0100 & 01 52 43.6 & + 01 00 58 & [email protected] & [email protected] & 407 & 2.84 & 7.309@xmath249 & 3.09 & 6.900 & a267 dc & 0.2300 & 9 & 1 + rxcj0152.9 - 1345 & 01 52 59.8 & -13 45 07 & [email protected] & [email protected] & 462 & 1.69 & 1.000@xmath249 & 6.30 & 0.009 & ngc 720 & 0.0057 & 15 & 1 + rxcj0153.5 - 0118 & 01 53 32.0 & -01 18 44 & [email protected] & [email protected] & 433 & 2.66 & 7.025@xmath249 & 2.50 & 6.277 & & 0.2438 & 1 & 2 + rxcj0157.5 - 0549 & 01 57 30.5 & -05 49 32 & [email protected] & [email protected] & 414 & 2.31 & 4.681@xmath249 & 3.29 & 2.332 & a281 dc & 0.1285 & 2 & 2 + rxcj0158.4 - 0146 & 01 58 28.4 & -01 46 51 & [email protected] & [email protected] & 406 & 2.55 & 4.948@xmath249 & 2.34 & 2.672 & a286 & 0.1632 & 1 & 1 + rxcj0201.7 - 0211 & 02 01 44.3 & -02 11 58 & [email protected] & [email protected] & 406 & 2.57 & 7.327@xmath249 & 4.25 & 6.941 & a291 & 0.1965 & 9 & 1 + rxcj0202.3 - 4447 & 02 02 18.8 & -44 47 37 & [email protected] & [email protected] & 465 & 2.70 & 2.359@xmath249 & 2.46 & 0.405 & & 0.0616 & 1 & 2 + rxcj0202.3 - 0107 & 02 02 20.6 & -01 07 06 & [email protected] & [email protected] & 405 & 2.58 & 2.103@xmath249 & 3.76 & 0.298 & a295 & 0.0428 & 5 & 3 + rxcj0206.4 - 1453 & 02 06 29.9 & -14 53 37 & [email protected] & [email protected] & 274 & 2.45 & 5.192@xmath249 & 3.00 & 3.003 & a305 & 0.1529 & 1 & 2 + rxcj0208.0 - 1537 & 02 08 00.2 & -15 37 05 & [email protected] & [email protected] & 286 & 2.38 & 5.000@xmath249 & 1.71 & & & & & + rxcj0211.4 - 4017 & 02 11 25.2 & -40 17 09 & [email protected] & [email protected] & 583 & 1.43 & 3.859@xmath249 & 3.24 & 1.457 & a2984 & 0.1022 & 8 & 6 + rxcj0212.8 - 4707 & 02 12 53.9 & -47 07 58 & [email protected] & [email protected] & 517 & 2.12 & 4.598@xmath249 & 3.93 & 2.232 & a2988 & 0.1150 & 25 & ? + rxcj0213.9 - 0253 & 02 13 56.6 & -02 53 53 & [email protected] & [email protected] & 350 & 2.16 & 5.000@xmath249 & 2.02 & & & & & + rxcj0214.6 - 0433 & 02 14 41.1 & -04 33 48 & [email protected] & [email protected] & 357 & 2.21 & 4.181@xmath249 & 2.12 & 1.772 & a329 & 0.1393 & 1 & 2 + rxcj0216.3 - 4816 & 02 16 19.1 & -48 16 23 & [email protected] & [email protected] & 542 & 2.95 & 5.573@xmath249 & 2.86 & 3.568 & a2998 & 0.1709 & 1 & 1 + rxcj0216.7 - 4749 & 02 16 43.3 & -47 49 31 & [email protected] & [email protected] & 523 & 2.95 & 2.809@xmath249 & 3.63 & 0.644 & s239 & 0.0640 & 23 & 1 + rxcj0218.3 - 3141 & 02 18 19.6 & -31 41 34 & [email protected] & [email protected] & 486 & 1.87 & 5.000@xmath249 & 1.96 & & & & & + rxcj0219.1 - 1724 & 02 19 08.3 & -17 24 40 & [email protected] & [email protected] & 390 & 2.99 & 5.000@xmath249 & 1.74 & & & & & + rxcj0220.9 - 3829 & 02 20 56.8 & -38 29 02 & [email protected] & [email protected] & 558 & 1.85 & 10.965@xmath249 & 8.48 & 18.532 & & 0.2287 & 2 & 6 + rxcj0225.1 - 2928 & 02 25 10.2 & -29 28 23 & [email protected] & [email protected] & 445 & 1.70 & 3.710@xmath249 & 8.35 & 1.327 & & 0.0607 & 1 & 2 + rxcj0225.8 - 4154 & 02 25 53.7 & -41 54 19 & [email protected] & [email protected] & 460 & 2.14 & 8.693@xmath249 & 5.19 & 10.503 & a3017 & 0.2195 & 1 & 1 + rxcj0227.2 - 2851 & 02 27 12.6 & -28 51 18 & [email protected] & [email protected] & 343 & 1.55 & 5.003@xmath249 & 1.40 & 2.743 & edcc651 & 0.2138 & 2 & ? + rxcj0229.3 - 3332 & 02 29 22.3 & -33 32 13 & [email protected] & [email protected] & 471 & 2.07 & 3.352@xmath249 & 3.92 & 1.029 & apmcc269 & 0.0779 & 1 & 2 + rxcj0229.9 - 1316 & 02 29 56.4 & -13 16 12 & [email protected] & [email protected] & 312 & 2.04 & 5.000@xmath249 & 2.53 & & & & & + rxcj0230.8 - 3305 & 02 30 51.2 & -33 05 49 & [email protected] & [email protected] & 456 & 1.96 & 3.116@xmath249 & 3.27 & 0.848 & a3027 & 0.0774 & 13 & 4 + rxcj0231.7 - 0451 & 02 31 47.3 & -04 51 21 & [email protected] & [email protected] & 125 & 2.55 & 5.619@xmath249 & 2.51 & 3.640 & a362 & 0.1843 & 1 & 3 + rxcj0231.9 + 0114 & 02 31 57.5 & + 01 14 38 & [email protected] & [email protected] & 227 & 2.56 & 1.714@xmath249 & 8.12 & 0.171 & & 0.0221 & 1 & 2 + rxcj0232.2 - 4420 & 02 32 17.2 & -44 20 43 & [email protected] & [email protected] & 369 & 2.61 & 13.183@xmath249 & 8.66 & 28.933 & & 0.2836 & 1 & 2 + rxcj0236.6 - 1923 & 02 36 39.6 & -19 23 05 & [email protected] & [email protected] & 349 & 2.65 & 4.100@xmath250 & 3.45 & 1.179 & a367 & 0.0891 & 17 & 3 + rxcj0237.4 - 2630 & 02 37 29.0 & -26 30 13 & [email protected] & [email protected] & 325 & 1.56 & 7.042@xmath249 & 3.08 & 6.305 & a368 & 0.2200 & 2 & 1 + rxcj0241.3 - 2839 & 02 41 20.9 & -28 39 27 & [email protected] & [email protected] & 423 & 1.56 & 4.300@xmath250 & 2.55 & 5.942 & a3041 & 0.2323 & 1 & 3 + rxcj0244.1 - 2611 & 02 44 06.3 & -26 11 07 & [email protected] & [email protected] & 286 & 1.74 & 4.726@xmath249 & 3.00 & 2.389 & & 0.1362 & 4,19 & 6 + rxcj0245.2 - 4627 & 02 45 12.6 & -46 27 14 & [email protected] & [email protected] & 539 & 3.15 & 2.986@xmath249 & 2.32 & 0.757 & a3047 & 0.0868 & 1 & 1 + rxcj0248.0 - 0332 & 02 48 02.6 & -03 32 09 & [email protected] & [email protected] & 224 & 4.12 & 7.521@xmath249 & 4.85 & 7.396 & a383 & 0.1899 & 1 & 1 + rxcj0248.2 - 0216 & 02 48 16.3 & -02 16 44 & [email protected] & [email protected] & 117 & 3.65 & 8.748@xmath249 & 4.60 & 10.743 & a384 & 0.2360 & 2 & ? + rxcj0249.6 - 3111 & 02 49 36.9 & -31 11 19 & [email protected] & [email protected] & 419 & 1.80 & 1.837@xmath249 & 8.89 & 0.206 & s301 & 0.0232 & 8 & 34 + rxcj0251.4 - 2456 & 02 51 28.8 & -24 56 58 & [email protected] & [email protected] & 365 & 1.90 & 4.500@xmath250 & 2.85 & 1.511 & a389 & 0.1111 & 8 & 6 + rxcj0251.7 - 4109 & 02 51 42.3 & -41 09 00 & [email protected] & [email protected] & 496 & 1.86 & 5.000@xmath249 & 2.02 & & & & & + rxcj0252.8 - 0116 & 02 52 50.1 & -01 16 28 & [email protected] & [email protected] & 135 & 5.25 & 1.833@xmath249 & 8.84 & 0.205 & ngc 1132 & 0.0232 & 10 & 1 + rxcj0258.2 - 2105 & 02 58 15.0 & -21 05 29 & [email protected] & [email protected] & 287 & 1.92 & 3.859@xmath249 & 2.25 & 1.458 & a3073 & 0.1226 & 1 & 1 + rxcj0303.2 - 2735 & 03 03 14.8 & -27 35 59 & [email protected] & [email protected] & 266 & 1.55 & 5.000@xmath249 & 2.40 & & a3082 & & & + rxcj0303.3 + 0155 & 03 03 21.3 & + 01 55 35 & [email protected] & [email protected] & 222 & 7.82 & 6.421@xmath249 & 5.08 & 5.062 & a409 & 0.1530 & 9 & 1 + rxcj0304.0 - 3656 & 03 04 06.0 & -36 56 32 & [email protected] & [email protected] & 384 & 1.95 & 6.958@xmath249 & 3.01 & 6.120 & a3084 & 0.2192 & 2 & ? + rxcj0307.0 - 2840 & 03 07 04.0 & -28 40 15 & [email protected] & [email protected] & 237 & 1.36 & 8.674@xmath249 & 3.88 & 10.434 & a3088 & 0.2534 & 7 & ? + rxcj0311.4 - 2654 & 03 11 25.3 & -26 54 00 & [email protected] & [email protected] & 210 & 1.56 & 2.722@xmath249 & 2.98 & 0.593 & a3094/edcc736 dc & 0.0677 & 3 & 67 + rxcj0313.6 - 3817 & 03 13 38.0 & -38 17 55 & [email protected] & [email protected] & 321 & 2.03 & 2.905@xmath249 & 2.34 & 0.704 & a3098 & 0.0833 & 3 & 6 + rxcj0314.3 - 4525 & 03 14 19.6 & -45 25 24 & [email protected] & [email protected] & 313 & 3.57 & 4.252@xmath249 & 8.31 & 1.845 & a3104 & 0.0718 & 2 & 4 + rxcj0317.7 - 4848 & 03 17 46.4 & -48 48 42 & [email protected] & [email protected] & 487 & 2.06 & 5.000@xmath249 & 1.93 & & a3113 & & & + rxcj0317.9 - 4414 & 03 17 58.2 & -44 14 16 & [email protected] & [email protected] & 481 & 2.53 & 4.100@xmath250 & 29.10 & 7.130 & a3112 & 0.0754 & 1 & 2 + Abstract:

Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.

Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered . Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video . Paper: correlation and interference distinguish quantum from classical mechanics . the former is manifest in the measurement of many - body coincidences predicted by a quantum joint probability density function ( pdf ) , which are not observed classically @xcite . the latter is most familiar as a probability density function for an outcome that can be achieved in at least two indistinguishable ways . however , interference can also be generated by superposing many - body states in indistinguishable ways @xcite . experimental confirmation of quantum correlation has involved photons @xcite , atoms @xcite , and josephson phase qubits @xcite . however , there is little experimental evidence of correlated interference between massive particles . the boundary between the classical and quantum regimes continues to be an area of interest both in attempts to explain why quantum effects are difficult to measure on a macroscopic scale @xcite and in attempts to measure quantum effects on a macroscopic object @xcite . reflection measurement methods used in an attempt to extend this boundary involve light interacting with stationary @xcite and oscillating mirrors @xcite and with microwaves interacting with an oscillating mirror @xcite . reflection of a single photon from an oscillating mirror @xcite and using a bose einstein condensate as a mirror from which photons reflect @xcite have been studied . to extend this boundary to larger masses , we model correlation of a mesoscopic / macroscopic ` mirror ' with a non - zero rest mass microscopic ` particle ' after elastic reflection . motion is in free space along one dimension and all states are unbound . measurements of particle reflection , but not associated with correlated interference , have involved mirrors that reflect atoms @xcite and bose - einstein condensates @xcite , atoms reflecting from a solid surface @xcite , neutrons @xcite and atoms @xcite reflecting from vibrating mirrors , and atoms reflecting from a switchable mirror @xcite . if the particle and mirror are initially in eigenstates of energy then the following two states interfere : the particle - mirror state before the particle reflects from the mirror and the particle - mirror state after reflection ( interference is a consequence of the incident and reflected states being indistinguishable for a measurement of position ) . this is similar to the standing wave interference of a harmonic electromagnetic wave reflecting from a stationary mirror @xcite . classically , however , the incident and reflected waves interfere while the mirror experiences only a continuous force due to radiation pressure . the two - body quantum analogy involves solving the schrdinger equation with an interaction potential modeling the reflection . interference is expected between the incident and reflected particle substates _ along with _ interference of the mirror substates which have and have not reflected the particle . their correlation is perhaps not expected , being a consequence of the solution to the schrdinger equation from which a joint probability density function is constructed . this joint pdf then describes the correlations in the two - body interference which are manifest as coincidence rates , e.g. a correlation in the simultaneous measurement of particle _ and _ mirror positions . asynchronous measurement in such a system has also been discussed @xcite . any experimental realization of such an interferometer will involve wavegroups . while the coherence length for the particle currently can be as large as @xmath0 m for atoms released from a bose - einstein condensate , that for a mesoscopic / macroscopic mirror will be many orders of magnitude smaller . however , the coherence length of the two - body state involves that of both the particle and mirror substates . the two - body interference in reflection from a mirror is then limited spatially ( to the overlap region ) and temporally ( to the time of overlap ) in a manner similar to that of a pulse of light reflecting from a moving mirror . classical interference in reflection is more robust when the pulse of light reflects from a moving thin film for two main reasons : first the reflected pulses from each thin film surface maintain overlap as they both travel in the backward direction and second they have the same doppler shift ( since they reflect from interfaces moving at the same speed ) . interference is then limited by a pulse coherence length which at its minimum is of order the film thickness . to achieve such robust two - body quantum interference we consider the analogous two - body situation , an example of which is a neutron reflecting from each of the two surfaces of a moving aluminum ` slab . ' it is shown below that this two - body interference has the same ` non - local ' characteristics as does a pulse of light reflecting from a moving thin film . treating both the particle and reflector as quantum objects yields the expected results of a one - body treatment ( analogous to interference for a pulse of light reflecting from a moving thin film ) but only as a special case . in addition , this treatment predicts novel reflection regimes depending on the coherence lengths of the particle and reflector . quantum two - body reflection differs from that classically . for example , the classical kinematics , associated with reflection of a wavegroup , involves accelerated mirror motion while the kinematics associated with the expectation value of the position of either the particle or mirror , during the interaction , depends on the two - body wavegroup parameters such as coherence lengths . this is discussed in section [ sec : summary ] . also , under conditions of destructive interference , the particle and slab will never simultaneously be observed . classically , only the pulse of light will never be observed . a simultaneous measurement , however , is difficult to perform . a much simpler method involves only measuring the reflected particle . such a one - body measurement can reveal the quantum state of the reflector due to the effects of the reflector s coherence length on the two - body pdf , from which the one - body marginal pdf is derived . this manifestation of the macroscopic quantum state of the reflector on the interference measured only on the particle may be a practical way to verify that the mesoscopic / macroscopic reflector is indeed in a quantum state and thereby extend the quantum - classical boundary to larger masses . finding examples of mesoscopic / macroscopic quantum phenomena has been a topic of interest since early in the development of quantum mechanics , particularly with regard to validation issues . this continues to be a subject of interest . consider next some of the arguments used to explain why such effects are not observed with mesoscopic / macroscopic objects , in relation to the two - body treatment of particle reflection : ( 1 ) in an introductory quantum course , the lack of such evidence is often justified via the double slit experiment , where the fringe spacing becomes imperceptible as the mass increases . in the comments after eqn . [ eq : fringespacing ] , an explanation is given as to why the mirror fringe spacing does not shrink as its mass increases . ( 2 ) another concern is if quantum correlation is indeed generated . the initial particle - mirror separable system becomes correlated in reflection as a consequence of conservation of energy and momentum . the discussion in section [ sec : summary ] demonstrates why interferometric quantum correlation is a requisite in satisfying these conservation laws . ( 3 ) the difference in wavevectors of the interfering mesoscopic / macroscopic mirror substates , due to reflecting a microscopic particle , is much smaller than the spread in wavevectors of which the mirror wavegroup is composed , due to thermal motion . this effect is shown to not destroy interference in section [ sec : summary ] . ( 4 ) more recently , decoherence of the macroscopic superposition via interaction with the environment has been used to explain the lack of interference . mitigation of this and other decoherence mechanisms are discussed in section [ sec : decoher ] . this work examines the assumptions of these arguments in the context of reflection of a microscopic particle from a mesoscopic / macroscopic mirror . a synopsis of this work is as follows : first the schrdinger equation is solved for the two - body energy eigenstates in reflection from a moving mirror . wavegroups formed from these solutions are then used to illustrate interference in reflection with an emphasis on variations in coherence lengths of the mirror . coherence transfer from the particle to the mirror is also demonstrated and related to classical reflection . two models are next developed for two - body reflection of a particle from a slab , whose classical analog is that of reflection of a pulse of light from a moving thin film . the effects of the coherence lengths of both the particle and slab are then discussed . measurements of either the particle but not the slab and the slab but not the particle are then considered . finally , decoherence issues , as well as methods to measure a mesoscopic / macroscopic reflector in a superposition state , are addressed . the goal of this paper is to illustrate the unique interferometric properties of correlation interferometry in reflection . these properties are most easily understood using the example of a microscopic particle reflecting from a mesoscopic / macroscopic mirror . however , the focus on this example is not intended as a practical experimental proposal . observation of such correlated interference will most likely first occur with a microscopic particle reflecting from a `` microscopic '' mirror . before reflection , the solution to the schrdinger equation for the non - interacting particle - mirror state is @xmath1 , \label{eq : psiseparable}\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath2 and @xmath3 are the particle and mirror positions along the x - axis while @xmath4 and @xmath5 are the wavevectors for the particle and mirror respectively ; @xmath6 and @xmath7 with masses @xmath8 , @xmath9 , and initial velocities @xmath10 and @xmath11 , respectively . a wavegroup constructed from such uncorrelated particle - mirror states then leads to predictions about the probability of simultaneously finding the particle at @xmath2 and mirror at @xmath3 . the particle - mirror interaction is modeled as a moving delta function potential where reflection is assumed to occur at the center of mass ( cm ) of the mirror with the schrdinger equation given by @xmath12 \notag + i\partial_{t})\psi=0 . \label{eq : schreqn}\end{aligned}\ ] ] where square brackets are used to indicate the argument of a function . the mirror reflectivity , related to @xmath13 , goes to infinity for a lossless mirror . the solution yields an energy eigenstates for the particle - mirror interaction ( ` harmonic wavefunctions ' ) , for which neither the particle nor the mirror is localized . a separable solution to the two - body schrdinger equation results from a transformation to the center of mass ( cm ) and relative ( rel ) system ( not to be confused with the cm of the particle or mirror ) . this does not change the total energy , @xmath14 . the transformed schrdinger equation becomes @xmath15 \notag + i\partial_{t})\psi[x_{cm},x_{rel},t]=0 \label{eq : scheqncm}\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath16 , @xmath17 , @xmath18 , and @xmath19 . using @xmath20=\psi_{cm}\psi_{rel } \notag \\ = e^{-i e_{cm } t/\hbar } u[x_{cm } ] e^{-i e_{rel } t/\hbar}u[x_{rel } ] \notag , \label{eq : schtot}\end{aligned}\ ] ] reduces the schrdinger equation to two ordinary differential equations : @xmath21}{dx_{cm}^{2 } } = e_{cm } u[x_{cm } ] \label{eq : scheqode1}\ ] ] @xmath22}{dx_{rel}^{2}}+\beta \delta[x_{rel } ] = e_{rel } u[x_{rel } ] . \label{eq : scheqode2}\ ] ] the particle - mirror solution must vanish at @xmath23 to satisfy the boundary condition at the mirror and not exist for @xmath24 ( or @xmath25 ) since the particle can not move through the mirror ( for the uncorrelated incident state , however , there is no interaction and the particle can move past the mirror ) . in this transformed system , a solution is constructed from the superposition of incident and `` reflected '' wavefunctions , @xmath26 , \label{eq : superposition}\ ] ] where @xmath27 $ ] is the unit step function . the only difference between the arguments of the two exponentials is the sign of the relative wavevector @xmath28 which , due to reflection in the relative coordinate , is negative . that is , @xmath29 where the initial velocities must allow reflection to occur . the solution to eqn . [ eq : scheqode1 ] is given by @xmath30 the complete solution is then @xmath31=\psi_{cm}\psi_{rel}$ ] . in this separable system the probability density is @xmath32 . \label{eq : separableinterference}\end{aligned}\ ] ] the cm - rel transformation does not give a solution for a physically realizable system . there exists no particle with a reduced mass , for example . nevertheless , its utility lies in inverting the solution from cm and relative substates into particle and mirror substates . this yields a correlated particle - mirror state . an example of this procedure is found in the solution to the hydrogen atom where the schrdinger equation is first transformed from the laboratory to the cm - relative coordinates yielding uncorrelated substates . however , expressing this result in the electron and proton substates reveals a correlation between them @xcite . this change of partition is accomplished by the following substitutions in the separable solution given in eqn . [ eq : separableinterference ] : @xmath33 , @xmath34 , @xmath19 , @xmath18 , @xmath35 , and @xmath36 . these constraints transform @xmath37 in eqn . [ eq : superposition ] into the non - interacting particle - mirror solution of eqn . [ eq : psiseparable ] . transformation of the energy component of each reflected substate , given by @xmath38 with @xmath39 for the reflected particle and @xmath40 with @xmath41 for the mirror , is consistent with that of reflection classically . with this change in coordinates eqn . [ eq : separableinterference ] becomes @xmath42 . \label{eq : entangledinterference}\end{aligned}\ ] ] this is similar to gottfried s result for the interference obtained in the correlation between two particles produced in a momentum - conserving decay after each has traversed separate double slits @xcite . note also that the interference given in eqn . [ eq : entangledinterference ] couples particle and mirror variables , illustrating how many - body states interfere with themselves rather than each substate interfering only with itself @xcite . measurement of such a prediction involves preparation of the initial state , adjusting the instruments to measure _ both _ positions @xmath2 and @xmath3 simultaneously , making the measurement , and then repeating this procedure over an ensemble to build a distribution . to illustrate how this leads to a measurement of the mirror fringe spacing , first the apparatus is set to always measure the particle at fixed position @xmath2 while the mirrors cm is measured at different positions @xmath3 for different members of the ensemble . using the approximation @xmath43 in eqn . [ eq : entangledinterference ] leads to interference fringes _ for the mesoscopic / macroscopic mirrors cm _ which vary from maximum to minimum through a distance @xmath44 similarly , by always measuring the mirror at fixed @xmath3 while varying the measurement position of the particle @xmath2 for different members of the ensemble , this approximation leads to interference fringes _ for the microscopic particle s cm _ which vary from maximum to minimum through a distance @xmath45 . for a static mirror both the mirror and particle fringes are spaced at half the debroglie wavelength of the _ particle _ , which can be up to @xmath0 m for ultra cold atoms @xcite . one issue predicted here , fundamental to extending the quantum - classical boundary , is that of interferometric effects which do not become imperceptible in the limit of large mirror mass . such effects are surprising in comparison with the imperceptible fringe spacing for a massive particle traversing a double slit . to understand why fringe spacing in reflection is robust with respect to variations in @xmath9 consider simplifying the two - body state into two one - body states . the first consists of the wavefunctions of the incident and reflected particle . the second consists of the mirror wavefunctions before and after reflection of the particle , both of which travel in the same direction but with different momenta . in the case of a mirror whose speed is close to zero , superposition of these particle states results in a `` standing wave '' with nodes or fringes spaced at about half the particle debroglie wavelength . superposition of the moving mirror states , on the other hand , forms a fringe spacing commensurate with the difference in momentum between the incident and reflected _ particle _ states . the larger the mass of the mirror the smaller the change in velocity of the mirror upon reflection . yet the difference in momentum between the mirror before and after reflection remains the same , depending only on the change in momentum of the particle and _ not _ on the mass of the mirror . it is this difference in mirror momenta which leads to the phase difference @xmath46 when superposing these two mirror wavefunctions . that is , the mirror fringe spacing is only determined by the change in particle momentum since conservation of momentum in reflection requires @xmath47 . while this simplified model , reducing a two - body state into two one - body states , demonstrates why interference for a mesoscopic / macroscopic mirror mass does not become imperceptible as @xmath48 , it does not account for the correlation given by the exact solution in eqn . [ eq : entangledinterference ] , which is inherently a two - body effect . double slit interference with a massive particle , on the other hand , superposes two one - body states with the same momentum whose difference in phase , @xmath49 , is due to the difference in path lengths from each slit to the measurement point times an extremely large wavevector . this results in an imperceptible fringe spacing . the probability of measuring the particle at @xmath50 and the mirror at @xmath51 is given by @xmath52 dx_{1 } dx_{2}$ ] with the joint pdf determined by the solution of equation [ eq : schreqn ] as @xmath53 . using this equation , conservation of probability can then be expressed locally as , @xmath54}{\partial t}+ \frac{\partial j_{1}[x_{1},x_{2},t]}{\partial x_{1}}+\notag \\ \frac{\partial j_{2}[x_{1},x_{2},t]}{\partial x_{2}}=0 , \label{eq : consprob}\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath55=\hbar ( \psi^ { * } \partial_{x_{1 } } \psi-\psi \partial_{x_{1 } } \psi^{*})/(2 i m)$ ] and @xmath56=\hbar ( \psi^ { * } \partial_{x_{2 } } \psi-\psi \partial_{x_{2 } } \psi^{*})/(2 i m)$ ] . while the expressions for these current densities appear similar to that for one particle systems there are subtle but important differences for a two - body system @xcite . multiplying equation [ eq : consprob ] by @xmath57 , integrating over the segment from @xmath58 to @xmath59 along the x - axis ( @xmath60 and @xmath61 ) , and then rearranging terms yields a solution to equation [ eq : consprob ] if @xmath62 dx_{1 } dx_{2 } + \notag \\ \int_{a}^{b } ( j_{1}[b , x_{2},t]-j_{1}[a , x_{2},t ] ) dx_{2 } \notag \\ + \int_{a}^{b } ( j_{2}[x_{1},b , t]-j_{2}[x_{1},a , t ] ) dx_{1}=0 \notag . \label{eq : cons2}\end{aligned}\ ] ] this is most easily interpreted using an @xmath63 by @xmath63 rectangular region aligned along the @xmath2 and @xmath3 axes . the time rate of change in probability within this region is determined by the change in flux of probability out along the @xmath2 axis ( @xmath64-j_{1}[a , x_{2},t]$ ] ) plus that along the @xmath3 axis @xmath65-j_{2}[x_{1},a , t])$ ] . since these fluxes in general vary spatially they have to be integrated over this variation along the rectangular boundaries . numerical integration of the wavegroup results presented below are consistent with conservation of probability . to better understand the practical consequences of these results , wavegroups are next formed from a superposition of the incident and reflected ` harmonic wavefunctions ' ( given in eqn . [ eq : superposition ] ) expressed in terms of the correlated particle and mirror substates . an analytic expression for such wavegroups can be obtained for a gaussian distribution in wavevector components @xmath4 and @xmath5 . for the mirror , this is proportional to @xmath66/(2 \delta k^{2})$ ] , where the peak of the distribution is at @xmath67 and @xmath68 is its width , while for the particle , this is proportional to @xmath69/(2 \delta k^{2})$ ] , where the peak of the distribution is at @xmath70 and @xmath71 is its width . the incident wavegroup propagates in the @xmath72 plane along a line whose slope is determined by a ratio of the group velocities of each substate and spreads due to dispersion independently in each direction . . the lower pdf waveform moves toward the diagonal white line , corresponding to @xmath23 , then reflects in the middle snapshot where the incident and reflected two - body wavefunctions ` overlap ' , and finally it moves away from the diagonal in the upper snapshot . the upper left inset is a schematic of the ` classical ' analog before reflection while the upper right inset is that after reflection with initial and final particle and mirror velocities @xmath10 , @xmath11 , @xmath73 , and @xmath74 respectively . there is no classical analog for the middle snapshot . ] in fig . [ fig : interference ] snapshots of the two - body probability density function are shown at three times for @xmath75 , @xmath76 , and @xmath77 . a slice of fig . [ fig : interference ] for @xmath78 along the @xmath3 coordinate is shown in fig . [ fig : fringespacing ] ( the solid line ) along with a slice of this fig . for @xmath79 along @xmath2 ( the dashed line ) for different bandwidth wavegroups . illustrates that the fringe spacing for the particle and mirror substates with narrow bandwidth wavegroups , are essentially the same for the particle and mirror substates , as discussed for the approximation @xmath80 following eqn . [ eq : fringespacing ] . which show the fringe spacing along the @xmath3 axis for @xmath78 ( dashed lines ) and along the @xmath2 axis for @xmath79 ( solid lines ) . the @xmath2 axis has been inverted to display both the dashed and solid lines together . although each graph has @xmath76 the value of @xmath68 increases sequentially by a factor of @xmath81 from the front to the back . ] verification of correlated interference requires simultaneous measurement of the particle and cm of the mirror with instruments having a spatial resolution smaller than the fringe spacing . for a static mirror this spacing is half the debroglie wavelength of the particle , which at @xmath82 for ultracold atoms @xcite satisfies this requirement while it is dubious at @xmath83 for slow neutrons @xcite . another constraint on the interference illustrated in fig . [ fig : interference ] is that the fringe visibility function must be non - zero . that is , the incident and reflected particle - mirror wavegroups must ` overlap . ' the interference fringes are then determined predominately by a superposition of ` harmonic wavefunctions ' @xcite . for example , the interference shown in fig . [ fig : interference ] is determined predominately by eqn . [ eq : entangledinterference ] when the wavegroups ` overlap ' in the center snapshot . the longitudinal coherence lengths for both the particle and mirror are greater than the fringe spacing in this figure . in the upper snapshot there is neither ` overlap ' nor such interference . the fringe visibility function is non - zero if each wavegroup substate ` overlaps ' within approximately a longitudinal coherence length @xcite , which is given by @xmath84 @xcite . for particle substates this can be @xmath85 for ultracold atoms @xcite or @xmath86 for slow neutrons @xcite . if the uncertainty in the mirror velocity is determined by its thermal equilibrium with the environment then @xmath87 yielding @xmath88 . this expression is consistent with results for ultra - cold atoms in a bose - einstein condensate @xcite . in the interference region , simultaneous measurement is approximately confined both to a spatial region determined by the two coherence lengths and a temporal region given by the time during which the wavegroups overlap . the former is small for mesoscopic / macroscopic mirror masses while the duration of the interference is essentially determined by the speed of the particle and its coherence length which is approximately equal to @xmath89 for a static mirror when @xmath90 . one method , discussed below , to reduce these coherence length limitations is with multiple such two - body states . first however , the effect of variations in mirror coherence lengths on correlated interference is illustrated . [ fig : spreadvelocity ] illustrates how variation in the longitudinal coherence length of the mirror substate affects the particle - mirror interference with fixed particle substate coherence length . part a shows a longer mirror coherence length than is used in fig . [ fig : interference ] while parts [ fig : spreadvelocity]b through [ fig : spreadvelocity]d progressively reduce the coherence length of only the mirror substate . one might expect that the small coherence length associated with a mesoscopic / macroscopic mirror mass would not allow for the interference shown in fig . [ fig : spreadvelocity]a or [ fig : spreadvelocity]b . in fig . [ fig : spreadvelocity ] d a small mirror coherence length along with a large mirror recoil prevents wavefunction overlap over a range of @xmath2 values ( @xmath91 ) where it was present before . nevertheless , a slice along the @xmath3 axis for measurement of the particle at these values of @xmath2 indicates a splitting of the mirror substate into two states which do not overlap and are therefore distinguishable . this splitting is a consequence of two ways that the particle could have reached @xmath2 . it could have come from the incident _ or _ reflected particle wavegroup substates since the position of the particle is not known to within its large coherence length . as the _ mirrors _ coherence length increases , the wavefunctions associated with these two ways overlap and generate correlated interference as shown in fig . [ fig : spreadvelocity]a . as the mirrors coherence length decreases , the position of the mirror before reflection is distinguishable from that after reflection due to mirror recoil , which results in _ no interference of either the particle or mirror _ , as shown in fig . [ fig : spreadvelocity]d for @xmath91 . that is , measurement of the particle at @xmath92 and mirror at @xmath79 is consistent with conservation of momentum for the particle and mirror not to have reflected while measurement of the particle at @xmath92 and mirror at @xmath93 is consistent with conservation of momentum for the particle and mirror to have reflected . the short coherence length of the mirror relative to the recoil distance then results in distinguishable two - body states . the condition for interference in a two - body system therefore involves the coherence of both bodies . but with different spreads in mirror velocities for a fixed spread in particle velocities while all other parameters are the same . @xmath94 , and @xmath95 for @xmath96 in parts a , b , c , and d respectively . note the change of scale in graph d. ] after reflection the spatial width of the mirror wavegroup substate is exchanged with that of the particle wavegroup substate when @xmath97 . this is most easily seen by constructing a particle - mirror wavefunction with different bandwidths for the particle and mirror wavegroup substates , shown in fig . [ fig : coherencetransfer ] which is a contour plot of joint pdfs similar to figure [ fig : interference ] but without the middle snapshot in the interference region . the solid and dashed contours correspond to @xmath98 and @xmath99 respectively with the spread in velocities given by @xmath100 . this result can be understood by comparing classical and quantum reflection . in a one - dimensional classical collision , conservation of energy and momentum require an exchange of particle - mirror velocities independent of either velocity for @xmath101 . this is manifest quantum mechanically in the exchange of commensurate wavefunction parameters @xmath4 and @xmath5 between the incident and reflected two - body wavefunctions . if an incident particle substate , consisting of only one harmonic component ( corresponding to speed @xmath10 ) reflects from a mirror substate with many velocity components , then each harmonic component of the mirror substate ( corresponding to different values of @xmath11 ) reflects the particle substate and therefore acquires velocity @xmath10 while the reflected particle substate acquires different velocity values for each reflected component of the mirror substate . this results in the reduction of the mirror bandwidth and an increase in the particle bandwidth , which is manifest in fig . [ fig : coherencetransfer ] as the exchange of incident and reflected wavegroup shapes . it also is responsible for the distortion of the reflected wavegroup shape in fig . [ fig : interference ] . but without the interference or `` overlap '' region snapshot , illustrating coherence transfer for two different particle - mirror mass ratios . the solid and dashed lines are for a spread in velocities given by @xmath100 with @xmath98 and @xmath99 , respectively . ] experimentally confirming coherence transfer involves reflection with disparate coherence lengths . on a microscopic scale , this could be observed between an atom which has been cooled to ultracold temperatures retro - reflecting from the same type of atom which has a shorter coherence length . the transfer of coherence might then be monitored not by a measurement of the pdf but rather by its coherence properties via interferometry . a more useful implementation for increasing the coherence length of larger objects could involve a group of bose - einstein particles ( the condensate ) , whose total mass is similar to that of the mirror , retro - reflecting`coherently ' from a mirror as ` one particle ' rather than a collection of individual particles . to mitigate both spatial and temporal fringe localization in reflection due to small particle and mirror coherence lengths , consider interference of multiple such two - body states : a one - dimensional example of which is the interference from the reflection of a neutron by each of the two surfaces of a moving aluminum ` slab ' . the two - body pdfs associated with two models of such reflection are calculated below . the first , presented in the next section , simply approximates each weak surface reflection as being due to a delta function potential which allows for both transmission and weak reflection . these two delta function potentials are fixed to and symmetrically offset from the cm of the slab ( of length @xmath102 ) by a distance @xmath103 , with multiple reflections neglected . the results from this simple model then corroborate those from a more accurate model , given in section [ sec : slab ] , involving a two - body treatment of a particle interacting with a finite barrier or finite well . the delta function ` beamsplitter ' model is included to focus attention on the physics associated with generating multiple two - body states . the more accurate finite barrier or well treatments conceal the fundamental physics but yield similar results . in essence , the latter incorporates multiple reflections along with the appropriately modified wavevectors between the surfaces of the slab while the former does not . the results of the simpler delta function model approach those of the finite barrier - well model as the reflections from the slab interfaces become weaker . for completeness , the results of the particle trapped in a moving infinite well are included in subsection [ sec : well ] . while the finite barrier or well examples discussed below deal only with unbound states , the infinite well is an example of the two - body formalism for a bound state . the classical analogy for the neutron reflecting from each of the two surfaces of a moving aluminum ` slab ' is that of a short pulse of light reflecting from a moving thin film . as the film s thickness , speed , or the average wavelength of the incident pulse changes , the reflected pulse intensity then varies as a consequence of the interference between the reflected waves from the two interfaces . classically , such thin film interference mitigates both the spatial and temporal fringe localization associated with reflection of a pulse of light from a moving mirror ( the analog of the two - body quantum treatment of a particle reflecting from a moving mirror ) . interference between the incident and reflected two - body pulse from the moving mirror is localized spatially by the coherence length of the pulse . these fringes are also temporally constrained by the pulse duration . however , interference of the two reflected light pulses , one from each surface of the thin film , dramatically reduces this fringe localization for two reasons : first the two reflected light pulses travel in the same direction thereby maintaining spatial overlap and second they experience the same doppler shift in reflecting from the two interfaces which move at the same speed resulting in fringes which are not time dependent ( this is not the case for interference of the incident and reflected pulses from a moving mirror ) . for similar reasons , interference of the two - body wavegroup states associated with reflection from each surface of the slab mitigates the fringe localization associated with reflection from a mirror however , the two - body interference is now between two wavegroups , each analogous to the one shown in the upper snapshot of fig . [ fig : interference ] and each of which corresponds to a reflection from only one surface of the slab and both of which move in the same direction thereby maintaining overlap . the classical treatment yields interference only for the pulse of light and not the mirror from which it reflects . the two - body quantum treatment presented below yields predictions about correlations in the measurements of both the neutron and slab . destructive interference of these wavegroups then corresponds to no probability of measuring the neutron and slab along the overlap region . a change in the slab s thickness , speed , or the average wavelength of the incident particle then results in a variation of the probability of simultaneously measuring the neutron and slab between zero and some maximum value , corresponding to constructive and destructive interference . a pulse of light reflecting from a thin film can also generate a standing wave within the film under appropriate conditions . similarly , two - body wavefunctions also generate such a `` fabry - prot '' resonance which is illustrated below . modifying @xmath13 to split rather than totally reflect the incident wave while including an offset in the delta function argument to model the surface which is offset from the cm of the slab yields the two - body reflected wavefunction . this eigenstate of energy or ` harmonic solution ' , for each surface reflection , is then superposed to form wavegroups associated with refection from that surface . rather than the waveform of the center snapshot in fig . [ fig : interference ] , a waveform analogous to that in the upper snapshot is the focus of this discussion . there are now two such reflected neutron - slab wavegroups , one for each slab surface , which interfere . since the neutron either reflects from the first surface or transmits through the first to the second , from which it then reflects , both reflected neutron substates have the same distribution of velocities . since in each case momentum is transferred to the slab only once for each of these two possible paths ( reflection from either the first _ or _ second surface of the slab ) , two associated slab substates are generated , each with the same velocity distribution . this results in two reflected neutron - slab wavegroups traveling at the same speed and direction but offset . interference then requires wavegroup ` overlap ' within a coherence length of both the neutron and slab substates . an example of a lack of overlap in the mirror substate , resulting in no two - body interference , was discussed in section [ sec : bandwidth ] and illustrated in fig . [ fig : spreadvelocity]d . this requirement , applied to the slab substate , is that the cm of the two reflected slab substates separate no further than their coherence lengths . this offset is estimated by the extra slab speed , beyond @xmath11 , acquired from the first reflection multiplied by the difference in particle reflection times between the two slab surfaces . assuming @xmath43 and @xmath104 this offset , @xmath105 , then must be less than @xmath106 , which if determined by thermal equilibrium requires @xmath107 next consider the constraint on @xmath108 . when a neutron wavegroup of spatial width @xmath109 ( where dispersion in reflection is neglected ) retro - reflects a distance @xmath110 from the cm of the slab , with @xmath110 much greater than both the wavegroup width @xmath109 and the slab length @xmath102 ( @xmath111 ) , ` overlap ' of the neutron wavegroups which have reflected from both surfaces occurs . for a near stationary slab the reflected neutron wavegroups are offset by about a distance @xmath112 , interference from which requires a neutron coherence length exceeding @xmath112 . an example which satisfies this constraint is a neutron of coherence length @xmath113 m @xcite reflecting from the two surfaces of an aluminum slab of thickness @xmath114 m ( there is little constraint on the area of this slab and therefore its mass ) . these parameters easily satisfy the overlap constraints for both the mesoscopic / macroscopic slab at room temperatures and the neutron . having achieved overlap , the resulting interference is then determined essentially by the harmonic wavefunctions yielding the _ constant _ two - body reflected joint probability density @xmath115 . \label{eq : slabinterference}\ ] ] assuming @xmath43 and @xmath104 yields @xmath116 . \label{eq : slabintapprox}\ ] ] the slab _ and _ reflected neutron will never be simultaneously observed when @xmath117 @xcite . such non - local two - body interference is similar to that of a pulse of light retro - reflecting from a thin film where destructive interference depends neither on the locations of the detector nor the thin film . indeed , in the limits just given these two cases are mathematically identical if the photon wavelength is replaced with the particle s debroglie wavelength . the pdf for reflection from the slab is illustrated for wavegroups in fig . [ fig : slab ] using parameters similar to those above : @xmath113 m , @xmath118 m , @xmath119 m/s , @xmath120 kg , and a slab coherence length determined by @xmath121 at @xmath122 . the neutron reflects from the first slab surface at @xmath79 , @xmath78 , and @xmath123 . to illustrate the non - local nature of the interference , three snapshots are chosen for times which allow the center of the wavegroup to change position by four orders of magnitude in both the neutron and slab coordinates . since the spatial size of the neutron - slab pdf is limited by small coherence lengths , a graph with a spatial region encompassing all of these points , while still showing the wavegroup structure , can not easily be generated . instead ` blow - ups ' in the @xmath72 plane of small regions around these points are shown . the snapshots in the upper row have a span in @xmath2 of @xmath124 m and a span in @xmath3 of @xmath125 m with the approximate centers of each graph located at @xmath126 m and @xmath127 m . the middle row of graphs have a span in @xmath2 of @xmath128 m and a span in @xmath3 of @xmath129 m with the approximate centers of each graph located at @xmath130 m and @xmath131 m . the lower row of graphs have a span in @xmath2 of @xmath132 m and a span in @xmath3 of @xmath133 m with the approximate centers of each graph located at @xmath134 m and @xmath135 m . the increase in span is needed since the wavegroup expands over these time scales . the vertical scale therefore decreases from top to bottom rows but is the same within each row so that pdf heights can only be compared within a row . the only parameter that differs between the graphs in the left and right columns of fig . [ fig : slab ] is the neutron velocity before reflection . it is @xmath136 m / s for the left and @xmath137 m / s for the right column respectively . these two neutron speeds result in either constructive or destructive interference ( left or right columns respectively ) of the neutron - slab wavegroups which are offset by @xmath138 due to reflection from the two slab surfaces . as this offset decreases ( e.g. by decreasing @xmath102 ) or @xmath108 increases , the pdf goes to zero approaching the destructive interference predicted in eqn . [ eq : slabintapprox ] ( since @xmath43 and @xmath104 ) . similar calculations also confirm the predictions that there is little effect on the interference from increasing @xmath9 while changes in @xmath10 have a significant effect . note also that the small size of the slab coherence length , @xmath139 m , is much larger than the offset due to reflection from the two slab surfaces , @xmath140 m , and therefore has little effect on the destructive interference . increasing the mass of the slab changes only the span in the @xmath3 coordinate of these graphs but not the interference . the parameters in fig . [ fig : slab ] are _ not _ chosen to illustrate effective wavegroup destructive interference but rather to show coherence length effects on the interference using experimentally realizable values . and @xmath2 respectively ) after reflection . the left column graphs differ from the right only in the speed of the incident neutron , illustrating constructive and destructive interference respectively . ] the model for a neutron traversing a slab of matter which incorporates multiple reflections and variation in the wavevector inside the slab is determined from the schrdinger equation given by @xmath141 \notag \\ + i\partial_{t})\psi[x_{1},x_{2},t]=0 , \label{eq : scheqn}\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath142 $ ] is now the potential energy associated with either the well or barrier . of interest is a solution which yields an energy eigenstate for the particle - well or barrier interaction , for which neither the particle nor the well or barrier is localized . wavegroups are then constructed from these states . a separable solution to this two - body schrdinger equation is obtained in a manner similar to that outlined in section [ sec : theoryparticlemirror ] . the center of mass and relative coordinate transformation yields solutions which are matched at the boundaries and then transformed to the particle - well coordinates . the infinite well potential is presented to illustrate the application of the two - body formalism to a bound state . then in subsection [ subsec : barrier ] calculations are outlined for a particle interacting both with a finite barrier and a finite well in unbound states . these provide a more accurate model for a neutron traversing a slab of matter than that just discussed . the boundary condition for the infinite potential well , of width @xmath102 , is @xmath143\rightarrow 0 $ ] . the relative wavefunction does not exist outside the well for @xmath144 and @xmath145 . a solution to eqn . [ eq : scheqn ] for a particle which has reduced mass is then @xcite @xmath146~\theta[x_{rel},d ] , \label{eq : psiwell2}\ ] ] where @xmath147=(\theta [ x_{rel}+d]-\theta [ x_{rel}-d])$ ] has value one within the well and zero everywhere else with n being the number of nodes . the solution to the center of mass ode ( the same as eqn . [ eq : scheqode1 ] ) is @xmath148 the complete solution is then @xmath31 \propto \psi_{cm}\psi_{rel}$ ] . again , we are interested in measurements of the particle and well rather than measurements of two transformed `` objects , '' one with a reduced mass and the other with the total mass of the system . expanding the sine function in eqn . [ eq : psiwell2 ] into exponential form results in wavefunctions traveling in opposite directions . transforming back to the particle - well coordinates , the momenta and energies of the particle and well differ in magnitude in these two directions . the modes of the well , characterized by the number of nodes @xmath149 , are determined in the cm - rel coordinates by @xmath150 . in the particle - well coordinates this constrains the incident values of particle and well velocities . that is , given an initial well velocity @xmath11 only the following initial particle velocities are allowed , @xmath151 in the particle - well coordinates the wavefunction s phase , @xmath152 , needs to have its temporal part parsed into the kinetic energy of the particle and the kinetic energy of the well . this is done as in the previous calculations . the resulting kinetic energies of the particle and well differ as the particle moves in opposite directions . these energies and their associated momenta are those expected of a classical particle reflecting from the moving well walls . the finite barrier or well ( referred to as only the barrier ) has potential energy @xmath153 ( positive for the barrier and negative for the finite well ) and extends over a distance @xmath102 . this divides space into three regions : before the barrier or `` before '' , in the barrier region or `` barrier , '' and after the barrier or `` after . '' solutions are first obtained for these three regions in the cm and rel coordinates by solving eqns . [ eq : scheqode1 ] and [ eq : scheqode2 ] . the solution to eqn . [ eq : scheqode2 ] before the barrier consists of incident and reflected wavefunctions given by @xmath154 where @xmath155 . the solution in the barrier - finite well region also consists of incident and reflected wavefunctions given by @xmath156 where @xmath157 . the solution after the barrier consists only of a transmitted wavefunction given by @xmath158 where @xmath159 . the boundary conditions are continuity of the wavefunctions and their derivatives with respect to @xmath160 at @xmath161 . these then constrain the coefficients @xmath162 , @xmath163 , @xmath164 , and @xmath165 with @xmath166 . again , the solution to eqn . [ eq : scheqode1 ] is given by eqn . [ eq : psiwell1 ] . the complete solution is then @xmath31 \propto \psi_{cm}\psi_{rel}$ ] . since we are interested in predictions about measurements of the particle and barrier rather than measurements of the reduced mass and total mass `` objects , '' a transformation from the relative and center of mass to the particle - barrier coordinates is required . in the particle - barrier coordinates the wavefunction s phase , @xmath152 , needs to have its temporal part parsed into the kinetic energy of the particle and the kinetic energy of the barrier . this procedure is the same as it is for the particle - mirror and particle - infinite well two - body states as described above . however , the product of the potential energy part of the total energy with time @xmath167 in the barrier region must be added to the phase . such a term has no measurable effect as will be shown next . the wavefunction in the barrier , expressed in the particle - well coordinates , is then @xmath168 where @xmath169 and @xmath170 contain the spatial terms in the phase and are functions of @xmath171 and @xmath172 . the temporal terms contain the kinetic energy for the particle and barrier moving to the right and left , @xmath173 and the potential energy @xmath153 . the kinetic energy terms are functions of @xmath174 , and @xmath172 . the potential energy term @xmath175 is a common factor of both the incident and reflected wavefunctions in the barrier . since the pdf is generated from the wavefunction multiplied by its complex conjugate , such common factors have no effect on the pdf . there is then no need to associate the potential energy part of the total energy with either the particle or the barrier or as a separate term in the phase , @xmath176 . the potential energy part of the total energy has observable consequences only parametrically within the momenta and kinetic energies of the particle and barrier . this simple division of the momentum and energy of the particle in the barrier can be contrasted with that of the stress - energy tensor for an electromagnetic wave traversing a dielectric slab @xcite . wavegroups are next formed from a gaussian superposition of the two - body energy eigenstates for the particle and infinite well or finite particle and barrier - well described above . correlated interference is a consequence of any such superposition . however , we focus the following discussion on the subsets of correlated interference effects which deal with the superposition of two such wavegroups . in particular , emphasis is given to the two - body quantum analogy of a pulse of light reflecting from a thin film : interference from the two - body wavegroups which have reflected from the two surfaces of the slab . at the risk of distracting from this main topic , correlated interference from multiple reflections when such a wavegroup interacts with an infinite barrier are also discussed . the wavegroup for the particle and barrier or finite well is calculated using a gaussian superposition of the energy eigenstates given in subsection [ subsec : barrier ] . unfortunately , the coefficients @xmath162 , @xmath163 , @xmath164 , and @xmath165 of eqns . [ eq : psibefore ] , [ eq : psibarrier ] , and [ eq : psiafter ] depend in a non - trivial manner on the variables of integration . the resulting integrals can not be determined in closed form . to facilitate the calculation , the following sums will replace these integrals : @xmath177 \notag \label{eq : barrierwavegroup}\end{aligned}\ ] ] where the peak of the barrier velocity distribution is at @xmath178 , @xmath179 is its width , and the sum is from an initial barrier velocity @xmath180 to a final velocity @xmath74 . summing over the particle velocity distribution yields the wavefunction for the wavegroup given by @xmath181 where the peak of the particle velocity distribution is at @xmath182 , @xmath183 is its width , and the sum is from an initial particle velocity @xmath184 to a final velocity @xmath73 . two cases are now treated : the unbound two - body wavegroup state of a particle and finite well and a similar unbound state of a particle and finite barrier . [ [ sec : barriergreater ] ] particle traversing a finite well : @xmath185 . + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + consider next a particle interacting with a finite well whose sum of initial kinetic energies in the relative coordinate system is greater than the well pe . the size of the particle substate wavegroup is chosen to be a few times larger than the finite well width @xmath102 . [ fig : barrier_negenergy ] shows results of the pdfs for three sequential snapshots taken at equal time intervals progressing along the dashed line from the lower left to upper right and upper left . the analogous classical positions of the particle and finite well for particular snapshots are illustrated in the insets . the barrier boundaries occur at the diagonal white lines , corresponding to @xmath186 . the parameters used in fig . [ fig : barrier_negenergy ] are @xmath187 , @xmath188 , and @xmath189 while the @xmath190 using the average value of @xmath191 for the wavegroup particle and well distributions . one category of correlated interference , which we call type i , occurs when the incident and reflected two - body wavefunctions , traveling in opposite directions in the @xmath192 plane , ` overlap . ' this is illustrated in fig . [ fig : barrier_negenergy ] for weak reflection by the fringes of the middle snapshot just to the left of the barrier or line @xmath193 and also by the fringes in fig . [ fig : interference ] . these fringes are spaced by about half the debroglie wavelength of the _ particle _ for @xmath194 and @xmath195 as are the similar correlated interference fringes in the two - body reflection of a particle from a mirror given in eqn . [ eq : entangledinterference ] . however , the interaction generates another form of correlated interference when the reflected wavegroups , one from each barrier surface , interfere as they travel along the _ same _ direction in the @xmath192 plane . this new category of correlated interference , which is referred to as type ii , is illustrated in fig . [ fig : barrier_negenergy ] by the peak labeled @xmath59 . this is the same type of interference from reflections at the two surfaces of the slab modeled as two delta function in section [ sec : twodelta ] . it is similar to the classical interference of a pulse of light reflecting from a thin film . changing only the barrier spacing generates an oscillation in the pdf for peak @xmath59 analogous to that found in the interference of a pulse of light reflecting from a thin film whose thickness varies . that is , this peak goes through constructive and destructive interference from the two barrier reflections when the wavegroup size is much larger than that of the barrier and the spacing @xmath102 is varied . as time progresses peak @xmath59 maintains this interference as it travels in the @xmath192 plane . these are the same characteristics of the interference found in the simple two delta function model of reflection from a slab given in section [ sec : twodelta ] and shown in fig . [ fig : slab ] . this differs from the type i correlated interference associated with the fringes shown in the middle snapshot of fig . [ fig : barrier_negenergy ] which is localized to a small temporal and spatial region . this figure illustrates yet another form of correlated interference , referred to as type iii : that from multiple reflections from the two barrier edges , which is shown as the fringes within the well of the middle snapshot of fig . [ fig : barrier_negenergy ] . these are analogous to the standing wave formed in a thin film or optical cavity . . the first snapshot generates peak @xmath58 while peaks @xmath59 and @xmath196 comprise the last snapshot . the classical analogs of these peaks are shown in the insets . the pdf progresses temporally along the dashed line . ] [ [ sec : barriermiddle ] ] particle traversing a finite barrier : @xmath197 . + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + consider next wavegroups for which some fourier components of the particle and barrier substates have a total initial kinetic energy in the relative coordinate system which exceeds the barrier potential energy while other components have a total relative initial kinetic energy which is less than the barrier potential . to illustrate the resulting pdfs the size of the particle and barrier substate wavegroups are chosen to be slightly larger than the barrier width @xmath102 . [ fig : barrier_posenergy ] shows the pdfs from such an interaction using three sequential snapshots , progressing along the dashed line from the lower left to upper right . the speed of the particle and well are illustrated for a classical system of two such particles in the insets next to each snapshot . again the diagonal white lines correspond to @xmath186 . the parameters used in fig . [ fig : barrier_posenergy ] are @xmath187 , @xmath188 , @xmath189 while the @xmath198 for the average value of the @xmath191 for the wavegroup distributions . this figure also illustrates type iii correlated interference but it differs from fig . [ fig : barrier_negenergy ] in that only the first mode is excited . additionally , the mode decays slowly enough to be visible in the third snapshot labeled as peak @xmath199 ( located between both @xmath186 and peaks @xmath59 and @xmath196 in the third snapshot ) . this peak is analogous to the buildup and decay of electromagnetic energy in a optical cavity . later snapshots ( not shown ) illustrate its decay . the peaks labeled @xmath59 in fig . [ fig : barrier_posenergy ] and fig . [ fig : barrier_negenergy ] are both of type ii . for the particle traversing the barrier . the only difference between the parameters used here and in fig . [ fig : barrier_negenergy ] is the pe which forms a barrier . ] the position of peak @xmath196 can be compared between figs . [ fig : barrier_negenergy ] and [ fig : barrier_posenergy ] since all parameters are the same except the pe . the location of this peak indicates the effect of the interaction on the relative transit times for the particle and finite well or barrier wavegroup substates . the infinite well - particle calculation differs from that of the barrier due both to the particle and well velocities being constrained by the resonance condition given in eqn . [ eq : quantizationvv ] and by the lack of coefficients , such as the @xmath162 , @xmath163 , @xmath164 , and @xmath165 used in the previous section , which depend on the parameters of integration . a closed form expression for the well substate wavegroup can be obtained from a gaussian distribution of the energy eigenstates parameterized in terms of velocity components , @xmath11 , of the well , given by @xmath200dv \notag \label{eq : psiwellwavegroup}\end{aligned}\ ] ] where the peak of the distribution is at @xmath178 and @xmath179 is its width . this is then summed over integral values of @xmath149 ( the number of nodes ) using the gaussian distribution @xcite @xmath201 \psi_{well}^{wavegroup } , \notag \label{eq : psiparticlewavegroup}\end{aligned}\ ] ] where the peak of the distribution is at @xmath202 and @xmath203 is its width . using these relations , the pdf is plotted with particle and well substate wavegroups whose spatial widths are less than the well spacing @xmath102 . [ fig : wellsynchfinal ] shows such pdf results for six snapshots taken at equal time intervals progressing from the lower left to upper right along the dashed line . ` reflection ' occurs at the diagonal white lines , corresponding to @xmath186 . the particle and well `` reflect '' from each other twice , in the second and fourth snapshots . the classical analogs for the particle and well positions for some snapshots are shown in the insets , labeled by a , b , and c. these correspond to the snapshots of the wavegroups labeled with the respective letters . while the insets are schematics of the ` classical ' analog between the wave and particle pictures , there is nothing similar for the correlated interference snapshots . interference occurs when the incident and reflected two - body wavefunctions ` overlap ' and is shown in higher spatial resolution for the first reflection in the right side inset of fig . [ fig : wellsynchfinal ] . the fringes are spaced by about half the debroglie wavelength of the _ particle _ for @xmath194 and @xmath195 , as are similar correlated interference fringes in two - body reflection of a particle from a mirror in fig . [ fig : interference ] . the parameters used in fig . [ fig : wellsynchfinal ] are @xmath204 , @xmath205 , @xmath206 , and @xmath207 . for a two - body wavefunction whose wavegroup size is less than the infinite well spacing . the diagonal white lines correspond to @xmath186 . the trajectory is indicated by the dashed line . the right inset is a blow - up of the correlated interference of the second snapshot . ] correlation measurements are more difficult to perform than measuring just one of the bodies in a many body system . to predict one body effects , the two - body pdf is integrated ( traced ) over the coordinates of one of the bodies thereby converting it into a ` one - body ' or marginal pdf for the other body @xcite . for example , consider a measurement of the particle but not the mirror for the two - body pdfs shown in fig . [ fig : spreadvelocity ] . averaging over the mirror coordinate in fig [ fig : spreadvelocity]a essentially eliminates any interference when measuring only the particle . averaging over the particle coordinate eliminates any interference in a measurement of only the mirror . yet there is interference in a correlated measurement . gottfried describes a related result using a different two - body interferometer @xcite . such averaging over the mirror coordinate of fig . [ fig : spreadvelocity]c , however , does not ` wash out ' interference in the particle - only measurement . the resulting particle - only ` standing - wave ' interference pattern in reflection from a static mirror is of course expected . yet the integral of this two - body pdf over the particle coordinate yields no mirror - only interference . this matches the classically expectation that there is interference for the wave reflecting from a mirror but not for the mirror . however , if the coherence lengths are switched ( it is difficult to increase the coherence length of a mesoscopic / macroscopic mirror ) then a particle - only measurement will yield no interference while a mirror - only measurement will yield interference . the two - body solution , when used in this manner to determine a one - body pdf , then reveals the limitations of starting with a solution to the one - body schrdinger equation where the potential ( mirror ) is assumed to be a classical rather than a quantum object . for example , a one - body pdf for the particle , determined by the one - body schrdinger equation , is a consequence of the solution to the two - body schrdinger equation only for coherence lengths used in fig . [ fig : spreadvelocity]c . the reflected one - particle pdfs obtained when averaging over the mirror coordinates of fig . [ fig : spreadvelocity]a , [ fig : spreadvelocity]b , and [ fig : spreadvelocity]d , however , _ can not _ be obtained without treating the mirror as a quantum object . the particle - only measurements , determined from this two - body treatment , then act as a probe of the mirrors quantum state . two regimes in which the quantum nature of the mirror is revealed are illustrated in fig . [ fig : spreadvelocity]a and d using fixed particle bandwidth . the result in part [ fig : spreadvelocity]a was discussed above . the other regime , shown in fig . [ fig : spreadvelocity]d , requires such small mirror coherence lengths that the incident and reflected two - body states are distinguishable , thereby also eliminating any interference . consider a simple estimate of the condition for which interference of the particle reflecting from the mirror disappears in the two - body pdf of fig . [ fig : spreadvelocity]d . this is done by approximating the incident two - body pdf of fig . [ fig : spreadvelocity]d as a rectangle with height @xmath208 and width @xmath209 @xcite . assuming a near stationary mirror with @xmath43 and @xmath104 , reflection then tilts this rectangle to an angle @xmath13 given by @xmath210 where @xmath211 and @xmath212 are the velocities after reflection of the mirror and particle . the overlap of the incident and reflected rectangles occurs at a distance @xmath213 from the point of maximum overlap given by @xmath214 . beyond @xmath213 no overlap or interference occurs . using the coherence length associated with thermal equilibrium of the mirror yields the following condition for the particle fringes to disappear in the two - body solution of fig . [ fig : spreadvelocity]d @xmath215 this condition generates a regime in which the quantum nature of the mirror is manifest via elimination of the expected one - body interference of the particle in reflection , which is caused by the incident and reflected paths becoming distinguishable as the mirror coherence length becomes smaller ( see section [ sec : bandwidth ] ) . although there is a lack of interference in the particle - only measurement , the two - body state is still split . this is evident in fig . [ fig : spreadvelocity]d as a bimodal distribution for which there is a finite probability of finding states of both reflection _ and _ no reflection . the effect is enhanced with reflection of ultra - cold atoms which have both larger coherence lengths and masses than neutrons . a yet larger mass could involve a bose - einstein condensate itself if it reflects as ` one particle ' rather than a collection of individual particles from the mirror @xcite . such ` standing - wave ' interference on reflection of a bose - einstein condensate ( @xmath216 m ) is eliminated with a mirror of @xmath217 kg ( the average mass of a mosquito ) and @xmath218 k. reflection of both atoms @xcite and bose - einstein condensates @xcite from mirrors has been studied but neither in the regimes discussed here nor in an attempt to measure such ` standing - wave ' interference . next consider measuring only the particle after reflection . for destructive interference of the joint pdf illustrated in fig . [ fig : slab ] ( or destructive interference of peaks b in figs . [ fig : barrier_posenergy ] and [ fig : barrier_negenergy ] ) , such averaging yields a low probability of measuring only the neutron even if the slab is _ not _ measured . in this case , destructive interference is maintained in the one - body neutron pdf . the analogy between the measurement of a short pulse of light reflecting from a thin film and a measurement of only the neutron then has a similar physical interpretation . in both cases the detector need only be placed in the path of the moving neutron or the pulse of light , which leads to a one - body measurement that is independent of the wavegroup size . there is no requirement that the spatial resolution of the measuring instrument be smaller than the coherence length of the object being measured . as in the mirror case , this example of destructive interference in a one - body measurement ( which is derived from the two - body wavefunction ) is valid only for a range of coherence lengths for both the slab and particle . such coherence length dependence can be illustrated assuming a small reflection coefficient and using the mirror pdf of fig . [ fig : spreadvelocity]d for reflection from the first slab surface where the small slab coherence length is due to its mesoscopic / macroscopic mass . consider a similar figure to represent the `` mirror '' reflection from the second slab surface but offset by a slab thickness , @xmath102 , which is sufficient to prevent overlap of the reflected two - body wavefunctions from these two figures . this is a case where the particle does not experience interference even after having reflected from both slab surfaces and having a coherence length greater than the slab thickness . a simple estimate of this condition for the slab is given by again assuming that the incident two - body pdf of fig . [ fig : spreadvelocity]d is a rectangle of height @xmath208 and width @xmath209 . for a near sationary mirror with @xmath43 and @xmath104 , the rectangles reflected from each surface are tilted at an angle @xmath13 given by @xmath210 . the positions of the slab surfaces are essentially vertical in the @xmath219 plane . the two reflected rectangles just separate when @xmath220 . using the coherence length associated with thermal equilibrium of the slab with its environment yields the temperature condition for which there is no interference @xmath221 note the similarity with eqn . [ eq : slabtemp ] where the condition on @xmath222 is for interference rather than for lack thereof . such elimination of interference is due to the two particle - slab reflected states becoming distinguishable as the slab coherence length decreases in a manner similar to that discussed for the particle - mirror system in section [ sec : bandwidth ] and is only a consequence of treating both the particle and slab as quantum objects . if the slab is not treated as a quantum object then particle interference will always occur as long as the particle coherence length is greater than the slab thickness . a similar effect is found in the particle - well model . consider now the opposite extreme in the quantum character of the slab , that of small slab bandwidth or large uncertainty in the slab position . unlike the case of large mirror uncertainty where averaging over the mirror position in fig . [ fig : spreadvelocity]a ` washes out ' interference , uncertainty in the slab position does not eliminate the one - body - only measurement of the interference for the particle reflecting from both slab surfaces . this is a consequence of that interference not depending on the slab location . the inequality in eqn . [ eq : slabtemp2 ] is most easily satisfied by increasing the mass of the reflected particle ( increasing the recoil of the slab ) and/or that of the slabs spacing ( requiring an increase in the coherence length of the particle ) while decreasing the mass of the reflector ( increasing the slab recoil ) . reflection of a neutron traveling at @xmath223 m/s from a slab at @xmath224k , as in the example used above , yields no interference for @xmath225 kg . elimination of ` thin - film ' interference for a mesoscopic / macroscopic slab requires larger @xmath8 and @xmath102 ( with the size of the mesoscopic / macroscopic mass decreasing quadratically with these parameters ) . interference in a typical one - body interferometer ` washes - out ' as the fringe spacing becomes imperceptible with increasing mass . another mechanism that eliminates interference is a measurement to determine along which path the object traveled through the interferometer . the former issue was mitigated using two - body reflection of a microscopic particle from a mesoscopic / macroscopic object , as described above , while the latter is the first topic of this section . a method to determine path information and therefore destroy interference utilizes a ` heisenberg microscope , ' where an additional particle scatters from the object traversing the interferometer . if the wavelength of this particle , @xmath226 , is smaller than the spatial separation along the two paths , @xmath203 , then path information can be obtained in principle from the state of this scattered probe particle and interference is destroyed . this was verified using a three grating mach - zehnder interferometer traversed by an atom and using a photon as the probe to determine path information @xcite . the contrast of the interference , as a function of @xmath203 , was shown to drop dramatically for @xmath227 . generating such decoherence for particle - mirror interference involves using a probe particle to determine the mirrors position during interference . the ` two paths ' exist only during the time that the incident and reflected two - body wavegroup states overlap for reflection from a mirror . during this time there are two distances that the mirror could have moved : that associated with and that without reflection . if the probe particle can resolve the difference in these distances then the ` path ' associated with reflection is distinguishable from that without reflection . for a near stationary mirror with @xmath43 and @xmath104 , the mean difference in these mirror distances is @xmath228 , which when equal to the wavelength of a probe particle of mass @xmath229 then requires that the probe have velocity @xmath230 . this calculation can also be used to approximate the effect of such decoherence on the mirror from the collisions with gas atoms forming the thermal bath which surrounds the mirror if these gas atoms are considered to be the probe which determines path information and they scatter from only one of the superposed mirror states . the interference in reflection described above is then maintained if there is a small probability of these atoms having the velocity , @xmath231 . for a mesoscopic / macroscopic mirror and both a microscopic particle and a probe , @xmath203 is too small to be resolved by typical low temperature gas atoms . next this decoherence mechanism is applied to slab reflection . the two surface reflections cause a difference in slab displacement which was given in section [ sec : twodelta ] for a near sationary mirror with @xmath43 and @xmath104 , as @xmath232 . determining from which slab surface the particle reflects then requires that the probe have velocity @xmath233 . this decoherence mechanism can also be applied to the emission of photons by the slab between the times of particle reflection from each slab surface . if the photons wavelength is small enough to allow for the location of the slab associated with one of the reflections ( @xmath140 m in the neutron - slab example given above ) , interference is destroyed since it can then be determined at which slab surface the reflection occurred @xcite . obviously the probability of such a thermal photon emission is small . these calculations indicate that environmental decoherence associated with obtaining path information can potentially be mitigated . this is due in part to the displacements associated with the interfering reflector substates being proportional to @xmath234 . to measure such small displacements requires scattering particles with proportionally smaller wavelengths which are typically not found in the environment . it should be pointed out that the calculations presented above assume that states for the particle , mirror , and slab have a minimum spatial profile ( minimum uncertainty gaussian wavepackets ) . this will be referred to as a phased state . introducing a random phase into the fourier components of either one or both of the substates of such an incident two - body phased state affects the shape and size of the wavepacket while maintaining the same bandwidth and therefore the same coherence length . this is referred to as a dephased state . such random phase structure is introduced as an initial condition but could have been imposed via an earlier measurement which collapsed the reflector state into a dephased state . consider an incident phased particle substate and incident dephased mirror substate which then reflect . a one - body particle measurement after reflection can then act as a sensitive probe of this mirror substate . to illustrate this consider how the pdf of fig . [ fig : spreadvelocity]c changes for such a dephased state . first , the pdf is spread spatially along the @xmath3 axis . second , the magnitude of the interference part of the pdf is greatly reduced but not eliminated . finally , the pdf is not spatially uniform . apart from its magnitude and spatial uniformity , this pdf is more similar to fig . [ fig : spreadvelocity]a than [ fig : spreadvelocity]c . this is not surprising since the localization of the dephased mirror substate is similar to that of the mirror in fig . [ fig : spreadvelocity]a . results of a particle - only measurement are predicted from an integral ( trace ) over the mirror coordinate of this pdf which then ` washes - out ' this interference . if the mirror is in a dephased state , a reflecting particle - only measurement will not exhibit interference in the overlap region . however , such interference is expected both when treating the mirror as a classical potential and for a phased mirror substate with the coherence lengths similar to those shown in fig . [ fig : spreadvelocity]c . the spatial extent of such a dephased mirror substate can vary between being unlocalized to being the minimum size determined by the bandwidth . this size can then be probed by varying the wavelength of the incident particle in a reflected particle - only measurement , in which case interference either disappears or reappears as this wavelength becomes smaller or larger than the spatial size of the dephased mirror substate . yet another decoherence mechanism is through interaction with the environment . zurek predicted exponential decay of the off - diagonal density matrix element terms for a macroscopic object in a superposition state , @xmath235 $ ] , with time constant @xmath236 where @xmath237 is the thermal relaxation time , @xmath203 is the difference in distance between these two states , and @xmath238 is the thermal de broglie wavelength of the macroscopic object @xcite . the decay is into a mixed rather than a pure state . it is interesting to note that the lack of interference predicted in section [ subsec : onlyparticle ] also depends on @xmath203 but for very different reasons . applying this decoherence model to the macroscopic slab states after reflection of the neutron , as described above , yields @xmath239 . for these neutron parameters this ratio is large ( @xmath240 for @xmath241 kg at @xmath242k ) due to the very small offset introduced from the recoil ( @xmath243 ) . the parameter of interest , @xmath244 , is also affected by @xmath237 which can vary dramatically depending on environmental and material properties along with the dimensional values of the slab . mesoscopic masses can have short thermal relaxation times . nevertheless , it appears that environmental decoherence for reflection from a slab can easily be made negligible in this model of decoherence . applying this decoherence model to the mesoscopic / macroscopic mirror states during correlated interference in reflection allows a greater variation of parameters since atoms or molecules can more easily reflect from a surface than from both surfaces of a ` thin film . ' the result , @xmath245 , therefore allows environmental decoherence for the mirror to more easily be made either negligible or non - negligible . consider next the consequences of such decoherence on correlated interference where the particle and mirror are in superposition states of both having and not having reflected . if this mirror substate decoheres into a mixed state then it seems reasonable to assume that the commensurate particle substate must also decohere into a mixed state since the two substates are correlated via conservation of energy and momentum . measurement of only the particle , after the mirror has decohered , therefore yields no interference since the particle can not then be in a superposition state . applying this result to a measurement of only the neutron flux reflecting from the slab , while varying the incident neutron s wavelength , results in no interference if the slab decoheres during the time between reflection from both surfaces . the details of actually executing such a measurement and of choosing parameters which straddle the region where decoherence is and is not applicable are of course much more complicated and are beyond the scope of this work . braginsky and khalili also treat environmental decoherence @xcite . however , they predict that for a macroscopic oscillator to exhibit quantum effects both the mechanical and thermal relaxation times are important while the parameter @xmath203 is not incorporated in their model . they argue that quantum effects can indeed be exhibited for macroscopic high q resonators . it has been shown that correlated interference in reflection does not disappear with increasing mirror mass , is difficult to eliminate via a path measurement , and can be made insensitive to environmental decoherence . it should also be pointed out that the robust character of interference for objects with many degrees of freedom is reinforced by measurements which demonstrate that even if the size of the object is larger than both the coherence length and debroglie wavelength , interference can still be observed @xcite . the use of reflection to generate perceptible interference in a mesoscopic / macroscopic object involves a microscopic particle interacting with a mesoscopic / macroscopic reflector to create two reflector substates which differ only by the microscopic momentum exchanged . unlike the fringes for a particle traversing a double slit , the interference fringes for the reflector substates do not vanish in the limit of large reflector mass . in addition , particle and reflector interference is required for conservation of energy and momentum to be satisfied . for example , consider reflection of a neutron from a slab . ` thin - film ' interference yields peak b in the two - body pdf of fig . [ fig : barrier_negenergy ] . destructive interference of the reflected neutron substate , which is certainly expected in a one - body treatment , must be associated with destructive interference of the slab substate ( peak b must not exist ) . that is , if the neutron can not be measured in reflection then the slab can never be measured at the position associated with it either having or not having reflected the neutron . similarly , by only changing the neutron wavelength to generate constructive thin - film interference in reflection , the slab must then have a commensurate probability to be found in a position of having reflected the neutron . measurement of interference in the reflected particle then requires that the reflector be in a superposition state which interferes in a manner correlated with that of the particle . this conclusion also holds for the interference shown in fig . [ fig : interference ] and presumably for all two - body interferometers . existence of such interference might be disputed since the difference in wavevectors of the interfering mirror substates , due to reflecting a microscopic particle , is much smaller than the spread in wavevectors of which the mirror wavegroup is composed , due to its thermal motion . this can be expressed as the ratio @xmath246 . interference , however , is not determined by @xmath247 but rather by the relation between the interferometer path difference and the coherence lengths of the interfering wavegroups . for a neutron reflecting from a mirror of @xmath248 kg , @xmath249 m / s , and @xmath218 k , the ratio @xmath250 yields a number which is of the same order of magnitude as is this ratio for an optical pulse of duration @xmath251 s ( from a mode locked ti - sapphire laser ) traversing a mach - zehnder interferometer , with the mirror in one arm moving at speed @xmath252 m / s ( all other interferometer components are static ) . optical pulse trains exhibit interference in similar interferometers @xcite with smaller @xmath247 values than in the particle reflection example just given . correlated interference in reflection is an example of one of the simplest interferometers , utilizing neither division of amplitude nor division of wavefront methods to generate interference . in addition , path lengths need not be carefully matched for interference to be manifest . the complexity of this interferometer is revealed as the coherence lengths of the particle and mirror substates are varied . examples are : ( 1 ) when both are small , classical reflection rather than interferometry essentially occurs . ( 2 ) when both are large , compared with the particle s wavelength , reflection becomes an interferometer yielding correlated interference , as shown in fig . [ fig : spreadvelocity]a , while no interference is observed in a one - body - only measurement of either the particle or mirror . due to uncertainty in the location of both objects , a measurement of the particle at @xmath2 then interferometrically correlates with a range of position measurements of the mirror . ( 3 ) when the mirror s displacement , due to recoil in reflection , is less than the mirrors coherence length and the coherence length of the particle is larger than that of the mirror , then a measurement of only the particle yields the expected interference from a one - body schrdinger equation treatment ( an example is shown in fig . [ fig : spreadvelocity]c ) . ( 4 ) when the coherence length of the particle is much larger than that of the mirror and mirror recoil is larger than its coherence length , reflection becomes a two - body beamsplitter . this is illustrated in fig . [ fig : spreadvelocity]d for @xmath91 . here two states are generated but do not interfere , one being the particle - mirror state before reflection and the other that after reflection , similar to a beamsplitter producing photon states which traverse spatially separate and therefore distinguishable paths . for example , at fixed @xmath2 there is a bimodal pdf along the @xmath3 axis , each peak of which corresponds to one of these two states . there is no interference since the short coherence length of the mirror relative to the recoil distance results in distinguishable two - body states ( the mirror has reflected the particle in the upper but not the lower pdf peak ) . the kinematics in the correlated interference regime can be compared with that of an electromagnetic wavegroup reflecting classically from a mirror . the latter involves accelerated motion due to a continuous force delivered to the mirror throughout the reflection process . to determine the former , consider the interference region shown in fig . [ fig : interference ] with @xmath253 , @xmath254 , and equal coherence lengths . if only the mirror is measured ( integrating the pdf over the particle coordinate ) then the expectation value for the mirrors position accelerates throughout the interaction time , as expected classically . if the mirror is not measured but the particle is , then the expectation value for the mirrors position decelerates at the same rate . however , these expectation value kinematics vary with parameters such as particle and mirror substate coherence lengths and masses . finally , the issue of how to determine that the mirror is in a superposition of states is considered . one method is to perform a correlation measurement of the positions of the particle and cm of the mirror in the interference region . in a region of destructive interference neither will be found . however , correlation measurements are difficult to perform . another possibility is to use a third particle as a probe , interacting only with the mirror to determine if the mirror is in a superposition state , in the following way : let this microscopic probe particle reflect from both mirror states ( reflecting from the other side of the mirror ) resulting in one - body interference of the probe . the coherence length of the probe need only be larger than the very small displacement of the mirror states for this probe interference to be exhibited , while the magnitude of the phase shift is determined by the mass of the probe . this is a method to measure that the mesoscopic / macroscopic mirror is in a superposition state , without any direct measurement of the mirror . however , calculations of such three - body interactions , which follow easily from the formalism discussed above , are beyond the scope of this already lengthy foundational work . methods to measure quantum effects on a mesoscopic / macroscopic reflector using only the reflected particle have been a focus of this work , rather than the methods just described . the reflected particle flux is then used to reveal properties of the quantum state of the reflector . one example is of a neutron reflecting from a slab . as with interference in reflection of light , the one - body schrdinger equation predicts a variation in reflected neutron flux as a function of incident neutron wavelength whenever the neutron coherence length is longer than the slab thickness . the calculation presented here , treating both the particle and reflector as quantum objects , also predicts such interference but only as a special case . in addition , this treatment predicts the following regimes under which no reflected interference occurs _ for a measurement of only the particle _ : ( 1 ) the reflection process acts as a beamsplitter and not an interferometer , generating two mirror or slab states which do not overlap . ( 2 ) the fourier components of the mirror substate have random phases sufficient to extend its size beyond that of the particle s wavelength . ( 3 ) the slab and mirror have coherence lengths long enough for correlated interference but not interference when only the particle is measured . in each of these cases , consider varying the incident particle s wavelength and observing no interference in the reflected particle flux . this indicates that the mesoscopic / macroscopic reflector is in a particular quantum superposition state . by varying parameters appropriately , as discussed in section [ sec : particleonlymirror ] , interference in this reflected particle flux then reappears . ironically , it is this lack of interference that then reveals the quantum nature of this mesoscopic / macroscopic ` thin film ' or mirror . in this case , measuring only the reflected particle flux yields significant experimental advantages over a measurement of the correlation between the particle and mirror . another possible method to study the state of the mesoscopic / macroscopic mirror is via the expected standing wave pattern generated between incident and retro - reflected states of a bose - einstein condensate as it interacts with a mirror . if this process can be modeled as described above , with the mass of the condensate replacing that of the particle , then the point at which condensate interference disappears can be extended to larger mirror masses . although interference between split condensates has been observed @xcite , as far as we are aware , there is no evidence of standing wave interference due to reflection . reflection of atoms from mirrors has been previously studied but not in treating both the particle and reflector as quantum objects nor in the reflector mass regimes discussed here nor in an attempt to measure either the resulting ` standing - wave ' interference or the effect of decoherence on such interference . there exist few examples of quantum correlated interference for non - zero rest mass particles . verification of the above predictions , even in the microscopic regime for both particle and reflector , is therefore of fundamental interest . although far from being comprehensive , these results indicate a direction , heretofore unexplored , for further research in understanding quantum correlation , probing decoherence , and extending quantum measurements to larger masses . bell , physics * 1 * 195 ( 1964 ) . k. gottfried , am . * 68 * 143 ( 2000 ) . d. salart , et . al . , phys . * 100 * 220404 ( 2008 ) . m. a. rowe , et . nature , * 409 * 791 ( 2001 ) . m. ansmann , et . al . , nature , * 461 * 504 ( 2009 ) . a. hagar , phil . r. soc . * 370 * 4425 ( 2012 ) ; m.schlosshauer , rev . of mod 76 * 1267 ( 2004 ) . a. d. cronin , j. schmiedmayer , and d. e. pritchard , rev . phys . * 81 * , 1051 ( 2009 ) . t. juffmann et . al . , nature nanotech * 7 * , 297 ( 2012 ) . b. abbott , et . new j. of phys . * 11 * 073032 ( 2009 ) . m. aspelmeyer , p. meystre , and k. schwab , phys . today * 65 ( 7 ) * , 29 ( 2012 ) . a.d . oconnell et.al . , nature * 464 * , 697 - 703 ( 2010 ) . a. nunnenkamp , k. borkje , and s. m. girvin , phys . lett . * 107 * , 063602 ( 2011 ) . f. de martini et.al . * 104 * , 050403 ( 2010 ) . d. kouznetsov and h. oberst , phys . a * 72 * , 013617 - 1 ( 2005 ) . t. a. pasquini , m. saba , g .- b . jo , y. shin , w. ketterle , and d. e. pritchard , phys . 97 * , 093201 - 1 ( 2006 ) . f. shimizu , phys . lett . * 86 * , 987 ( 2001 ) . t. hils et . al . , phys . a * 58 * , 4784 ( 1998 ) . y. colombe , b. mercier , h. perrin , and v. lorent , phys . a * 72 * , 061601 ( 2005 ) . szriftgiser , p. , d. guery - odelin , m. arndt , and j. dalibard , phys . lett . * 77 * , 4 ( 1996 ) . h. rauch , contemp . * 2 * 345 ( 1986 ) . kowalski , f.v . and browne , arxiv:1405.0031 [ quant - ph ] p. tommasini et.al . , am . * 66 * , 881 ( 1998 ) . siverman , _ more than one mystery _ , p-96 ( springer verlag , new york , 1995 ) . in the particle - mirror coordinates the incident and reflected wavevectors for the particle ( or mirror ) are not necessarily equal and opposite as they are in the cm / rel coordinates ( nor are they equal and opposite for a one particle system in which the mirror is fixed ) . the probability current density to the left of the mirror then exhibits spatial and temporal interference due to the effect this difference in wavevectors has on the incident and reflected wavefunctions . this results in a non - additive current density , a consequence of the space to the left of the mirror increasing as it moves . the net flux must account for the build - up of probability within this `` new '' space . pushin et . al . , phys . 100 * , 250404 ( 2008 ) . hamilton , a.g . klein , and g.i . opat , phys . rev . a , * 28 * , 3149 ( 1983 ) . the coherence length does not change even if the size of the wavepacket changes due to dispersion . klein , g.i . opat , and w.a . hamilton , phys . * 50 * , 563 ( 1982 ) . m. ferrero and a. van der merwe , _ fundamental problems in quantum physics _ , ( kluwer academic publishing , dordrecht , 1995 ) . the pauli exclusion principle is another example of destructive interference in a two - particle system . see r. c. liu , b. odom , y. yamamoto , and s. tarucha , nature 391 , 263 - 265 ( 1998 ) . c.u.serge and j.d . sullivan , am . * 44 * 729 ( 1976 ) . the coherence length is used here rather than the wavepacket size since the former rather than the later determines interference , op . s.m . barnett and r. loudon , phil . r. soc.a * 368 * 927 ( 2010 ) . chapman , et.al . , * 75 * , 3783 , ( 1995 ) . w. h. zurek , rev . * 75 * , 715 , ( 2003 ) . v.b . braginsky and f.y . khalili , _ quantum measurement _ , ( cambridge university press 1992 ) . l. lepetit , g. cheriaux , and m. joffre , j. opt . b * 12 * , 2467 ( 1995 ) . c. kohstall , s. riedl , e. s. guajardo , l. sidorenkov , j. h. denschlag , r. grimm , new j. phys . * 13 * , 065027 ( 2011 ) m. witkowski , r. gartman , b. nagrny , m. piotrowski , m. podzie , k. sacha , j. szczepkowski , j. zachorowski , m. zawada , and w. gawlik , phys . a * 88 * , 025602 ( 2013 ) if the condensate particles reflect individually from a receding mirror then they each acquire a different energy which decreases in their order of reflection . this is due to the energy exchanged with the mirror from the particles which have already reflected and is manifest as a distorted reflected wavegroup . Abstract:

Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.

Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered . Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video . Paper: the study of the formation of population iii stars in a cosmological context via high - resolution simulations is becoming a mature discipline , with multiple groups finding similar results ( bromm , coppi , & larson 2002 ; bromm & loeb 2004 ; abel , bryan , & norman 2002 ; oshea & norman 2007 ; yoshida et al . 2006b ; gao et al . however , all of these calculations operate under a common fundamental assumption namely , the absence of an ultraviolet background . given the abundance of halos in which population iii stars would form and the general consensus that these stars must be massive , one expects that , though only a small fraction of the volume of the universe would be ionized , a significant background of ultraviolet radiation in the lyman - werner ( lw ) band ( 11.18 - 13.6 ev ) , which is capable of photodissociating molecular hydrogen , would be present for the formation of the bulk of population iii stars ( omukai 2001 ; yoshida et al . 2003 ; machacek , bryan , & abel 2001 ; wise & abel 2005 ) . given that atomic hydrogen is optically thin to this radiation and that it easily destroys molecular hydrogen , this could have a significant impact on the formation of primordial stars . ( 2001 ) used cosmological amr simulations to study the formation of primordial stars in the presence of a soft uv background , and later including an x - ray background ( machacek , bryan , & abel 2003 ) . they found that the lw background delays the formation of population iii stars and shifts halo formation to higher masses . however , their calculations were not of sufficiently high resolution to give any significant information about the formation of the protostellar cloud at the core of each collapsing cosmological halo . ( 2003 ) performed a suite of large sph simulations of high redshift structure formation , including two calculations with a soft uv background with @xmath6 and @xmath7 , where @xmath8 is the mean intensity of the uv background in the lw band in units of @xmath9 erg s@xmath10 @xmath11 hz@xmath10 sr@xmath10 . they found that gas cooling is suppressed in the higher lw background case , and predicted that star formation would not occur . on the other hand , & haiman ( 2002 ) showed analytically that primordial gas in halos with t@xmath12 k can still collapse to high densities in the presence of a strong molecular hydrogen - dissociating background via atomic hydrogen line radiation , and can eventually form h@xmath13 . they referred to these objects as second generation objects " in the sense that although still of primordial composition , their formation pathway is different from the first stars . an issue that needs to be addressed concerns the mode of primordial star formation in halos with t@xmath5 k and above . it is apparent from recent studies using large numbers of simulations that smaller halos , with masses of @xmath14 m@xmath15 , appear to always form primordial stars in isolation ( gao et al . 2006 ; oshea & norman 2007 ) . is this still the case in halos whose masses are an order of magnitude or more larger ? does a single primordial star form , or several ? this is particularly relevant given that many semi - analytic models of structure formation that follow the chemical evolution of structures at high redshift ( scannapieco et al . 2005 ; schneider et al . 2006 ) suggest that halos of this scale which have not been enriched by metals ( and thus will form primordial stars ) exist up to at least @xmath16 . if this is true , there is expected to be a strong photodissociating background at that time ( yoshida et al . 2003 ; wise & abel 2005 ) . this paper is the second in a series . in & norman ( 2007 ) ( hereafter referred to as paper i ) , we examined several aspects of population iii star formation in a @xmath17cdm universe , in the absence of an ultraviolet background which photodissociates molecular hydrogen . in this paper , we study population iii star formation in a single cosmological realization varying the strength of the lw background , with the goal of investigating the effect that this background has on the evolution and properties of gas in the halo core ( at radii @xmath18 pc ) and the ultimate fate of the gas at the center of t@xmath5 k halos . we use a single cosmological realization , varying the strength of the photodissociating background over the range suggested by & abel ( 2005 ) , and look for the cutoff in population iii star formation suggested by ( 2003 ) . in agreement with the findings of ( machacek et al . 2001 ) , we find that the addition of a photodissociating background results in a delay of the collapse of high density gas at the center of the most massive halo in the simulation and , as a result , an increase in the virial mass of this halo at the onset of baryon collapse . we find that , contrary to the results of ( 2003 ) , star formation is not suppressed for j@xmath0 , but occurs even with backgrounds as high as j@xmath1 . we find that 2 cooling leads to collapse despite the depressed halo core molecular hydrogen fractions f@xmath19 by two multiplicative effects : ( 1 ) the elevated 2 cooling rates per molecule at @xmath2 k , and ( 2 ) time . we find that halo core collapse occurs in the usual way once the gas in the halo core has become dense enough that the cooling time becomes much less than the hubble time . we also observe a relationship between the strength of the photodissociating background and the rate of accretion onto the evolving protostellar cloud core , with higher lw background fluxes resulting in higher accretion rates . this is a simple consequence of the suppression of molecular hydrogen formation ( and thus suppression of cooling ) by the photodissociating background , as well as the higher virial temperatures of the more massive halos at the epoch of collapse . this may have implications for the range of population iii stellar masses . finally , we find that the collapsing halo cores in our simulations do not fragment at densities below @xmath3 @xmath4 regardless of the strength of the soft uv background , suggesting that population iii stars forming in halos with t@xmath5 k may still form in isolation . the organization of this paper is as follows . in section [ methodology ] we provide a description of enzo , the code used to perform the calculations in this paper and of the simulation setup . the results from our simulations are presented in sections [ results.meanprop ] through [ results.rephalos ] : section [ results.meanprop ] discusses some of the mean halo properties observed in the calculations , section [ results.evolution ] discusses the evolution of the halo core prior to collapse , section [ results.collapse ] compares spherically - averaged halo properties for all simulations at the epoch of collapse , section [ results.fixred ] discusses a variety of halo properties at a fixed redshift , and section [ results.rephalos ] compares the evolution of two representative simulations taken from our ensemble . in section [ sect.issues ] we discuss neglected physics and possible numerical issues , and in section [ discuss ] we discuss some of the results presented in this work and their implications . finally , we present a summary of the main results in section [ summary ] . ` enzo ' is a publicly available , extensively tested adaptive mesh refinement ( amr ) cosmology code developed by greg bryan and others ( bryan & norman 1997a , 1997b ; norman & bryan 1999 ; oshea et al . 2004 , 2005b ) . the specifics of the enzo code are described in detail in these papers ( and references therein ) , but we present a brief description here for clarity . the enzo code couples an n - body particle - mesh ( pm ) solver ( efstathiou et al . 1985 ; hockney & eastwood 1988 ) used to follow the evolution of a collisionless dark matter component with an eulerian amr method for ideal gas dynamics by & colella ( 1989 ) , which allows high dynamic range in gravitational physics and hydrodynamics in an expanding universe . this amr method ( referred to as _ structured _ amr ) utilizes an adaptive hierarchy of grid patches at varying levels of resolution . each rectangular grid patch ( referred to as a `` grid '' ) covers some region of space in its _ parent grid _ which requires higher resolution , and can itself become the parent grid to an even more highly resolved _ child grid_. enzo s implementation of structured amr places no fundamental restrictions on the number of grids at a given level of refinement , or on the number of levels of refinement . however , owing to limited computational resources it is practical to institute a maximum level of refinement , @xmath20 . additionally , the enzo amr implementation allows arbitrary integer ratios of parent and child grid resolution , though in general for cosmological simulations ( including the work described in this paper ) a refinement ratio of 2 is used . since the addition of more highly refined grids is adaptive , the conditions for refinement must be specified . in enzo , the criteria for refinement can be set by the user to be a combination of any or all of the following : baryon or dark matter overdensity threshold , minimum resolution of the local jeans length , local density gradients , local pressure gradients , local energy gradients , shocks , and cooling time . a cell reaching any or all of the user - specified criteria will then be flagged for refinement . once all cells of a given level have been examined , rectangular solid boundaries are determined which minimally encompass the flagged cells on that level . a refined grid patch is then introduced within each such bounding volume , and the results are interpolated to a higher level of resolution . in enzo , resolution of the equations being solved is adaptive in time as well as in space . the timestep in enzo is satisfied on a level - by - level basis by finding the largest timestep such that the courant condition ( and an analogous condition for the dark matter particles ) is satisfied by every cell on that level . all cells on a given level are advanced using the same timestep . once a level @xmath21 has been advanced in time @xmath22 , all grids at level @xmath23 are advanced , using the same criteria for timestep calculations described above , until they reach the same physical time as the grids at level @xmath21 . at this point grids at level @xmath23 exchange baryon flux information with their parent grids , providing a more accurate solution on level @xmath21 . cells at level @xmath23 are then examined to see if they should be refined or de - refined , and the entire grid hierarchy is rebuilt at that level ( including all more highly refined levels ) . the timestepping and hierarchy rebuilding processes are repeated recursively on every level to the maximum existing grid level in the simulation . two different hydrodynamic methods are implemented in enzo : the piecewise parabolic method ( ppm ) ( woodward & colella 1984 ) , which was extended to cosmology by ( 1995 ) , and the hydrodynamic method used in the zeus magnetohydrodynamics code ( stone & norman 1992a , 1992b ) . we direct the interested reader to the papers describing both of these methods for more information , and note that ppm is the preferred choice of hydro method since it is higher - order - accurate and is based on a technique that does not require artificial viscosity , which smoothes shocks and can smear out features in the hydrodynamic flow . the chemical and cooling properties of primordial ( metal - free ) gas are followed using the method of ( 1997 ) and ( 1997 ) . this method follows the non - equilibrium evolution of a gas of primordial composition with 9 total species : @xmath24 , @xmath25 , @xmath26 , @xmath27 , @xmath28 , @xmath29 , @xmath30 , @xmath31 , and @xmath32 . the code also calculates radiative heating and cooling following atomic line excitation , recombination , collisional excitation , free - free transitions , molecular line cooling , and compton scattering of the cosmic microwave background , as well as any of approximately a dozen different models for a metagalactic ultraviolet background that heat the gas via photoionization and/or photodissociation . we model the cooling processes detailed in ( 1997 ) , but use the & palla ( 1998 ) molecular hydrogen cooling function . the multispecies rate equations are solved out of equilibrium to properly model situations where , e.g. , the cooling time of the gas is much shorter than the hydrogen recombination time . a total of 9 kinetic equations are solved , including 29 kinetic and radiative processes , for the 9 species mentioned above . the chemical reaction equation network is technically challenging to solve due to the huge range of reaction time scales involved ; the characteristic creation and destruction time scales of the various species and reactions can differ by many orders of magnitude . as a result , the set of rate equations is extremely stiff , and an explicit scheme for integration of the rate equations can be costly if small enough timestep are taken to keep the network stable . this makes an implicit scheme preferable for such a set of equations , and enzo solves the rate equations using a method based on a backwards differencing formula ( bdf ) in order to provide a stable and accurate solution . it is important to note the regime in which this chemistry model is valid . according to ( 1997 ) and ( 1997 ) , the reaction network is valid for temperatures between @xmath33 k. the original model discussed in these two references is only valid up to n@xmath34 @xmath4 . however , addition of the 3-body h@xmath13 formation process allows correct modeling of the gas chemistry up until the point where collisionally induced emission from molecular hydrogen becomes an important cooling processes , which occurs at @xmath35 @xmath4 . we do not include heating by molecular hydrogen formation , which will be significant at densities of @xmath36 @xmath4 and above , and may affect temperature evolution at these high densities . a further concern is that the optically thin approximation for radiative cooling breaks down beginning at n@xmath37 @xmath4 . beyond this point , modifications to the cooling function that take into account the non - negligible opacity of the gas to line radiation from molecular hydrogen must be made , as discussed by & abel ( 2004 ) . even with these modifications , a more correct description of the cooling of gas of primordial composition at high densities will require some form of radiation transport , which will greatly increase the cost of the simulations . the simulations discussed in this paper are set up in a similar way to those in paper i. a dark matter - only calculation with @xmath38 particles in a three - dimensional simulation volume which is @xmath39 h@xmath10 mpc ( comoving ) on a side is set up at @xmath40 assuming a `` concordance '' cosmological model with no baryons : @xmath41 , @xmath42 , @xmath43 , @xmath44 ( in units of 100 km / s / mpc ) , @xmath45 , and using an eisenstein & hu power spectrum ( eisenstein & hu 1999 ) with a spectral index of @xmath46 . the cold dark matter cosmological model is assumed . this calculation is then evolved to @xmath47 using a maximum of four levels of adaptive mesh refinement , refining on a dark matter overdensity of 8.0 . at @xmath47 , the hop halo finding algorithm ( eisenstein & hut 1998 ) is used to find the most massive halo in the simulation . at this point , we generate a new set of initial conditions which contain the same large - scale power as the dark matter - only calculation , but include both dark matter and baryons such that the lagrangian volume in which the halo in the dark matter - only calculation formed is resolved at high spatial and mass resolution using a series of static nested grids , with a @xmath38 root grid and three static nested grids , for an overall effective root grid size of @xmath48 cells . the highest resolution grid is @xmath49 grid cells , and corresponds to a volume @xmath50 h@xmath10 comoving kpc on a side . the dark matter particles in the highest resolution grid are 14.48 h@xmath10 m@xmath15 and the spatial resolution of the highest resolution grid is 586 h@xmath10 parsecs ( comoving ) . previous work shows that this particle mass resolution is adequate to fully resolve the collapse of the halo ( abel et al . 2002 ; oshea & norman 2007 ) . all simulations are performed using the adaptive mesh cosmology code enzo , which is described in section [ enzocode ] . the simulations are started at @xmath40 and allowed to evolve until the collapse of the gas within the center of the most massive halo , assuming the presence of an unevolving soft uv background with intensities in the lyman - werner band of j@xmath51 and @xmath9 erg s@xmath10 @xmath11 hz@xmath10 sr@xmath10 . this range covers a much wider range of parameter space than the results described in ( 2001 ) , and completely encompasses the range of possible j@xmath52 values suggested by & abel ( 2005 ) , for a wide range of mean population iii stellar masses . note that many publications use f@xmath52 instead of j@xmath52 : f@xmath52 has units of erg s@xmath10 @xmath11 hz@xmath10 , and thus f@xmath53 j@xmath52 . we will use j@xmath52 throughout this paper , and for convenience express values in units of j@xmath54 , where @xmath8 is the mean intensity of the uv background in the lw band in units of @xmath9 erg s@xmath10 @xmath11 hz@xmath10 sr@xmath10 . the equations of hydrodynamics are solved using the ppm method with a dual energy formulation , which is required to adequately resolve the thermal properties of gas in high - mach flows . the nonequilibrium chemical evolution and optically thin radiative cooling of the primordial gas is modeled as described in section [ enzocode ] , following 9 separate species including molecular hydrogen ( but excluding deuterium ) , with an initial electron fraction of @xmath55 ( which is roughly consistent with ( 1968 ) for an @xmath56 , @xmath57 universe ) . note that the initial electron fraction in the calculation is relatively unimportant to the molecular hydrogen formation rates in halo cores , as the electron fraction at the center of a given halo is controlled primarily by mergers and the shock formed by accretion of gas onto the halo . adaptive mesh refinement is used throughout the innermost high resolution region such that cells are refined by factors of two along each axis , with a maximum of 22 total levels of refinement . this corresponds to a maximum spatial resolution of 115 h@xmath10 au ( comoving ) at the finest level of resolution , with an overall spatial dynamical range of @xmath58 . to avoid effects due to the finite size of the dark matter particles , the dark matter density is smoothed on a comoving scale of @xmath59 pc ( which corresponds to @xmath60 0.03 proper pc at @xmath61 ) . this is reasonable because at that scale in all of our calculations the gravitational potential in the halo of interest is completely dominated by the baryons . grid cells are adaptively refined based upon several criteria . we refine on baryon and dark matter overdensities in cells of 4.0 and 8.0 , respectively . this corresponds to a maximum mass of gas or dark matter per cell ( on the most highly refined static grid ) of m@xmath62 and @xmath63 m@xmath15 , respectively . in addition , the _ minimummassforrefinementlevelexponent _ parameter is set to @xmath64 for both the dark matter and baryon overdensity refinement criteria , meaning that the mass required to refine to a higher level decreases as a function of increasing level , as : @xmath65 where l is the current level of refinement . the negative exponent means that the mass resolution in the calculations is super - lagrangian for example , m@xmath66 m@xmath67 . in addition to refining on baryon and dark matter overdensity , these simulations include refinement criteria which ensure that shocks are always well - resolved , that the cooling time in a given cell is always longer than the sound crossing time of that cell , and that the jeans length is always resolved by at least 16 cells . this last criterion guarantees that the truelove criterion ( truelove et al . 1997 ) is always resolved by a factor of four more cells in each dimension than is strictly necessary , ensuring that no artificial fragmentation will take place . figures [ fig.image_jlw_0 ] and [ fig.image_jlw_1em21 ] show projections of baryon density and temperature for the j@xmath68 and j@xmath1 calculations , respectively , at the epoch at which each calculation collapses , defined as the redshift at which the baryon number density reaches @xmath69 @xmath4 . note that due to the rapid evolution of gas at high density , the `` collapse redshift '' depends very weakly on the exact choice of density threshold . the calculations are started from the same set of initial conditions , and the j@xmath1 calculation is clearly a later stage in the evolution of the j@xmath68 run . the satellite halos surrounding the primary halo which collapses at z=24.12 in the j@xmath68 run have merged by z=17.32 when the halo in the j@xmath1 case collapses ( cf . [ fig.merger ] ) . with virial masses of @xmath70 and @xmath71 , respectively , the latter halo is more than 20 times as massive as the former . though quite different in mass , both halos exhibit similar morphologies they are extremely centrally - concentrated , and only a single condensed object ( that is to say , a primordial protostellar cloud core ) is visible in the highest - resolution panel in each image . the existence of a single cloud core is common to all calculations discussed in this paper . simulation ( @xmath72 ; m@xmath73 m@xmath15 ) . top row : projected log baryon density . bottom row : projected , mass - weighted log baryon temperature . left column : region 2.13 kpc ( proper ) across and deep . middle column : region 133.3 pc ( proper ) across and deep . right column : region 0.130 pc ( proper ) across and deep . the middle and right column are zoomed images focusing on the high baryon density core which forms in the center of the halo . , scaledwidth=90.0% ] simulation ( @xmath74 ; m@xmath75 m@xmath15 ) . top row : projected log baryon density . bottom row : projected , mass - weighted log baryon temperature . left column : region 2.13 kpc ( proper ) across and deep . middle column : region 533 pc ( proper ) across and deep . right column : region 0.260 pc ( proper ) across and deep . the middle and right column are zoomed images focusing on the high baryon density core which forms in the center of the halo . , scaledwidth=90.0% ] figure [ fig.halovals1 ] shows several mean halo quantities for all simulations discussed in this paper , including halo collapse redshift as a function of j@xmath52 , virial mass as a function of j@xmath52 , virial temperature as a function of j@xmath52 , and the virial mass as a function of collapse redshift . simulations where the soft uv background is turned on are shown by solid squares , and the `` control '' j@xmath68 calculation is shown by an open square . in plots where j@xmath52 is shown on the x - axis , the j@xmath68 simulation is placed at log@xmath76 . figure [ fig.halovals1 ] shows that there is a clear relationship between the lw intensity and the collapse redshift and virial mass of the halo . a larger lw intensity results in a later collapse time and larger virial mass because the halo must be hotter in order to have a cooling time which is less than a hubble time despite the depressed 2 abundance in the high - density gas at the halo s center . this is discussed further in section [ results.evolution ] the final mass of the halos in the simulations with j@xmath1 is approximately a factor of 20 higher than that in the `` control '' simulation . this is in qualitative agreement with ( 2001 ) , who suggest that there is a `` minimum halo mass '' as a function of the strength of the lw background of the form @xmath77 this threshold mass is plotted in panel ( c ) of figure [ fig.halovals1 ] . [ eqn - mach - mthresh ] is only strictly valid over the range @xmath78 , because this was the range simulated by ( 2001 ) . we see that our points for @xmath79 parallel the threshold curve but at a mass approximately four times higher . this difference can be ascribed to two factors . first , the threshold mass is the lowest possible halo mass that can collapse , derived from a statistical sample . since we study only one realization which focuses on the most massive halo in the box , its mass is bound to be higher than the statistical minimum . second , ( 2001 ) s criterion for cooling catches halos at an earlier stage of evolution compared to our data points , which give the halos virial masses at the time of central baryon collapse ( the `` collapse redshift '' ) . examination of panels ( b ) and ( c ) of figure [ fig.halovals1 ] show that there is some sort of `` phase change '' between j@xmath80 and @xmath81 causing the halo mass at the time of collapse to increase steeply and non - monotonically . the collapse redshift steadily decreases as a function of uv increasing background strength ( i.e. collapse of gas at the center of the halo is delayed ) . however , panel ( c ) shows that the virial mass steadily increases with increasing uv background strength until j@xmath80 , at which point there is a jump in mass by more than a factor of four , above which the halo mass increases only slightly with increasing uv background strength . that something interesting should happen at these lw intensities is consistent with the findings of ( 2003 ) who found that 2 cooling is strongly suppressed at j@xmath82 . they predicted that star formation would be inhibited since the equilibrium 2 fraction is below the critical fraction for cooling derived by ( 1997 ) . contrary to these predictions , we find collapse not only at j@xmath82 , but also at values as large as j@xmath83 . we note that highest value considered by ( 2001 ) was j@xmath84 , and the highest simulated by ( 2003 ) was j@xmath82 . therefore our cases j@xmath85 have not been examined before , and certainly not at the resolution of our simulations . how is the gas in the center of these halos able to cool and collapse in such high radiation backgrounds ? this is analyzed in some detail in the next section . a hint is provided in ( d ) of figure [ fig.halovals1 ] , which plots the halo virial temperature as a function of j@xmath52 . at background strengths above j@xmath80 , the virial temperature is consistently approximately @xmath86 k , which is roughly the temperature at which atomic hydrogen cooling is effective . however , an examination of the radial temperature profiles shows that high - density gas in the center of the halo never reaches these temperatures , but is more typically 2000 k. atomic line cooling is unimportant at such low temperatures ; however the 2 cooling rate per particle is roughly 100 times as large at 2000k as at 500k . 2 cooling still operates in the halo centers despite low 2 abundance due to the higher cooling rates and long evolutionary timescales . in the rest of this section we merely present additional mean properties of the halo and its central region at collapse , and defer discussion of the relevant timescales to section [ results.evolution ] . vs. halo collapse redshift . panel ( b ) : halo virial mass vs. halo collapse redshift panel ( c ) : halo virial mass vs. j@xmath52 panel ( d ) : halo virial temperature vs. j@xmath52 the j@xmath68 `` control '' result are shown as an open square ( and is at log j@xmath87 in the panels which are a function of j@xmath52 ) . in the bottom left panel , the dashed line corresponds to the fitting function for threshold mass from ( 2001 ) , eqtn . 8.,scaledwidth=90.0% ] figure [ fig.halovals2 ] shows several properties of the halo core at the epoch of collapse , including the core temperature , molecular hydrogen fraction , and spherically - averaged accretion rate as a function of ultraviolet background strength , and the spherically - averaged accretion rate as a function of the molecular hydrogen fraction . all `` core '' values are spherically - averaged and measured at the mass shell where @xmath88 m@xmath15 of gas is enclosed . panel ( a ) shows that the core h@xmath13 fraction decreases significantly with increasing fuv flux , with a corresponding increase in the core temperature ( panel ( b ) ) . this relationship is similar to that noted in & norman ( 2007 ) , where the amount of molecular hydrogen at densities of @xmath89 @xmath4 varies between simulations , and correlates strongly with baryon temperature . given that the accretion of gas onto the protostellar cloud is subsonic , this results in a strong relationship between the soft uv background flux and accretion rate onto the protostellar cloud , as shown by panel ( c ) , with accretion rates varying by more than a factor of 30 between the j@xmath68 and @xmath90 cases . panel ( d ) shows the strength of the correlation between core h@xmath13 fraction and accretion rate . note that the values discussed above are insensitive to the exact definition of the halo `` core . '' core for several simulations with the same cosmic realization but a range of lw background intensities . panel ( a ) : j@xmath52 vs. baryon core temperature . panel ( b ) : j@xmath52 vs. baryon core @xmath31 fraction . panel ( c ) : j@xmath52 vs. instantaneous accretion rate . panel ( d ) : baryon core @xmath31 fraction vs. accretion rate . the j@xmath68 `` control '' result are shown as an open square ( and is at log j@xmath87 in the panels which are a function of j@xmath52 ) . all `` core '' values are spherically - averaged and measured at the mass shell where @xmath88 m@xmath15 of gas is enclosed . , scaledwidth=90.0% ] figure [ fig.halovals3 ] shows the halo core mass and mass fraction at the epoch of collapse ( note that the definition of `` core '' is somewhat different than in the previous figure ) . the halo `` core mass '' is defined as being all gas at a density of n@xmath91 @xmath4 or above , and the core mass fraction is defined as the core mass divided by the virial mass of the halo at the epoch of collapse . this choice of minimum density ensures that we have captured the entirety of the quasistatically contracting analog of a galactic molecular cloud core , and for practical purposes is comparable to the gas fraction of cold , dense gas discussed in ( 2001 ) . the size of the halo core increases in absolute terms as the strength of the photodissociating background is increased , from @xmath92 m@xmath15 until j@xmath93 , where it reaches @xmath94 m@xmath15 . above this value of j@xmath54 , the core mass then begins to decrease , reaching @xmath95 m@xmath15 at j@xmath1 . the core mass fraction generally decreases ( though with some noise in the relationship ) from @xmath96 at j@xmath68 to @xmath97 at j@xmath1 , though the total overall change is less than a factor of 2 . @xmath4 or above . the `` core mass fraction '' is defined as the `` core mass '' divided by the virial mass of the halo at the epoch of collapse . the j@xmath98 `` control '' result are shown as an open square ( and is at log j@xmath87 in the panels which are a function of j@xmath52 ) . , scaledwidth=90.0% ] we now examine in more detail the evolution of the conditions in the cloud center leading to collapse . in figure [ fig.evolution ] we plot the central density , temperature , entropy @xmath99 , and 2 fraction versus time for the calculations with @xmath100 ( solid line ) , @xmath101 ( short - dashed line ) , @xmath81 ( long - dashed line ) and @xmath102 ( dot - dashed line ) . in these plots , central values of temperature and density are defined as being the values of these quantities in the cell with the highest baryon density . it is most instructive to compare the two extreme cases , j@xmath103 , which very closely resembles the j@xmath104 case , and the j@xmath83 case , which according to ( 2003 ) should not collapse at all . in panel ( a ) we see the central density increase modestly from @xmath105 2 @xmath4 to @xmath105 20 @xmath4 over 40 myr , and then increase rapidly thereafter , reaching @xmath106 @xmath4 in a scant additional 15 myr . this evolution is driven by 2 cooling , as can be seen from the entropy evolution in panel ( c ) . as expected , runaway cooling occurs when the 2 fraction reaches @xmath107 ( panel d ) , consistent with the ( 1997 ) analysis . by contrast the j@xmath83 case requires 120 myr for the central density to increases from @xmath105 2 @xmath4 to @xmath105 20 @xmath4 . as shown in panel ( c ) , the first 50 myr of this contraction is adiabatic , followed by an increase in entropy due to some heating event ( mergers ) . the fact that central entropy is not decreasing for 90 myr is indicative of the fact that 2 cooling is unimportant over this interval due to extremely low equilibrium 2 fractions ( f@xmath108 ; ( panel d ) ) . however , something interesting happens in the j@xmath1 calculation at @xmath109 myr . prior to that time the central temperature has crept up to 5000 k due to the increased virial mass . the cooling rate per 2 molecule is about 3 orders of magnitude higher at 5000k than at 500k a typical temperature at the halo center in low uv background evolutions . we believe this high temperature is due to a combination of adiabatic heating as the potential well deepens , and merger - induced shock heating . as shown in figure [ fig.merger ] , three large halos merge between @xmath110 and @xmath111 , quadrupling the halo mass ( figure [ fig.halovals1 ] , panel ( b ) ) . the elevated cooling rates cool the gas at the halo center to @xmath112 , allowing the gas density to increase slightly . the two effects reduce the central entropy from @xmath113 700 k @xmath114 to @xmath115 250 k @xmath114 . this is followed by another heating event at t=190 myr , presumably due to another merger , followed by a second more catastrophic cooling event . at t=200 myr , the halo core collapses , driving the central density higher , temperature and entropy lower , and 2 fraction higher . why does this collapse occur ? this is analyzed in figure [ fig.timescales ] , where we plot the evolution of the important timescales in the center of the halo . in the j@xmath103 case , the 2-body 2 formation timescale is always roughly an order of magnitude smaller than the photodissociation timescale . consequently , the 2 abundance is out of equilibrium and grows steadily with time ( figure [ fig.evolution ] panel d ) . the 2 cooling time in the central zone ( @xmath116 myr ) is far less than the hubble time ( @xmath117 myr ) , and before too long runaway collapse occurs . at higher values of j@xmath52 , the 2-body 2 formation time always hovers around the photodissociation timescale , regardless of how long that timescale is . this tells us that 2 is in equilibrium : the 2-body formations balance the photo - destructions by the lw background . the equilibrium 2 fraction is given by @xmath118 where k@xmath119 is the rate coefficient for the formation of h@xmath120 ( the limiting reaction for h@xmath13 formation at the temperature and density range considered here ) , @xmath121 is the electron density , and k@xmath122 is the 2 photodissociation rate due to the solomon process ( abel et al . 1997 ; yoshida et al . 2003 ) . using t @xmath123 k and @xmath124 , we get @xmath125 , which is in good agreement with the 2 fractions we see in figure [ fig.evolution ] . since @xmath126/ n@xmath127 , the smaller @xmath128 is , the shorter its formation time . now let us consider the 2 cooling time evolution ( short - long - dashed line ) . it is far lass than a hubble time for j@xmath129 , ensuring that these halo cores will eventually cool and collapse . in the j@xmath83 case , the cooling time drops below the hubble time for the first time at t=170 myr , and again at t=190 myr where it begins a steady decrease toward @xmath130 yr . despite the low equilibrium 2 fraction , if we wait long enough the inexorable press of time eventually establishes the condition @xmath131 and we get runaway collapse , even for j@xmath83 . note that we get catastrophic cooling because we are in the density regime ( @xmath132 @xmath4 ) where 2 cooling is proportional to the square of the gas density , not linear in the gas density ( abel , bryan , & norman 2000 ; abel et al . 2002 ) . ( solid ) , @xmath101 ( short - dashed ) , @xmath81 ( long - dashed ) and @xmath90 ( dot - dashed ) . , scaledwidth=90.0% ] and @xmath90 ( panels ( a)(d ) , respectively ) : 2-body 2 formation time ( solid ) ; 3-body 2 formation time ( short - dashed ) ; 2 collisional dissociate time ( long - dashed ) ; 2 photodissociation time ( dot - dashed ) ; 2 cooling time ( short - long - dashed ) . , scaledwidth=90.0% ] , t@xmath133 k halo that collapses at z=17.32 with a lyman - werner background flux @xmath134 . in comic strip order , the redshifts are z=22 , 21 , 20 , 19 , 18 , and 17.32 . field of view is 53.571 comoving kpc ( 2.678 proper kpc at z = 19 ) . logarithm of the projected baryon density ( column density ) is displayed , with color table scaled to the maximum and minimum values in each image . , scaledwidth=90.0% ] figure [ fig.radprof_zcoll.1 ] shows radial profiles of baryon number density , temperature , enclosed mass , circular velocity , and rms mach number as a function of radius , as well as specific angular momentum as a function of enclosed mass , for all simulations discussed in this paper . to facilitate comparison , results from the output of each simulation where the peak baryon number density at the center of the halo is approximately @xmath135 @xmath4 are shown , in order to capture each halo at a similar evolutionary stage , rather than at a fixed point in time . panel ( a ) shows that all of the simulations have similar density profiles . the scatter in number density at a given radius is readily explained by variation in halo mass halos which collapse at later times ( due to higher uv background strength ) are more massive , and thus have higher overall baryon densities . this is shown in another way in panel ( c ) , in a plot of enclosed mass as a function of radius which shows that all halos have very similar profiles at @xmath136 pc , but a significant variation at larger radii which is related to halo mass . the plot of temperature as a function of radius in panel ( b ) shows an interesting trend as the lw background is increased , the overall halo temperature as well as the halo core ( where `` core '' is roughly defined as gas within @xmath137 pc of the halo center ) temperature go up . in the outskirts of the halo , where baryon densities are low and thus cooling times are long , this is due primarily to the increase in halo mass , with the peak temperature corresponding approximately to the halo virial temperature . in the halo core , however , this temperature is correlated more strongly with the h@xmath13 fraction , and thus the uv background , as suggested by figure [ fig.halovals2 ] . the plots of specific angular momentum as a function of enclosed mass and keplerian velocity fraction ( defined as the local circular velocity divided by the keplerian orbital velocity due to mass within that radius ) as a function of radius in panels ( d ) and ( e ) show some mild trends trends . it appears that halos in simulations with stronger uv backgrounds tend to have less specific angular momentum at a given mass shell , and also tend to have a lower keplerian velocity fraction at a given radius than gas in halos which form in the presence of a lower uv background indeed , the halo which forms in the j@xmath1 calculation has the least angular momentum of all of the simulations , and the lowest keplerian velocity fraction out to @xmath137 pc . we speculate that this is due to transport and segregation of angular momentum by turbulence halos whose collapse is delayed have more time for these processes to act within the halo core , resulting in less angular momentum overall when the halo ultimately collapses ( note that this will be discussed more fully in a later paper ) . the plot of rms mach number as a function of radius in panel ( f ) also shows no obvious trend , though at radii below @xmath138 pc , simulations with a smaller uv background generally have higher rms mach numbers . this is due primarily to the gas being colder , and not the gas velocities being higher . . panel ( a ) : @xmath139 as a function of radius . panel ( b ) : temperature as a function of radius . panel ( c ) : enclosed gas mass as a function of radius . panel ( d ) : specific angular momentum as a function of enclosed mass . panel ( e ) : keplerian velocity fraction as a function of radius . panel ( f ) : gas rms mach number as a function of radius . all quantities except enclosed gas mass are mass - weighted , and all simulations are shown at the point where the maximum number density is approximately @xmath135 @xmath4 . line types and weights correspond to simulations , as follows . black solid line : j@xmath68 . black short - dashed line : j@xmath140 . black long - dashed line : j@xmath141 . black dot short - dashed line : j@xmath142 . black dot long - dashed line : j@xmath80 . black short dashed - long dashed line : j@xmath143 . red solid line : j@xmath144 . red short - dashed line : j@xmath145 . red long - dashed line : j@xmath1 . , title="fig:",scaledwidth=30.0% ] . panel ( a ) : @xmath139 as a function of radius . panel ( b ) : temperature as a function of radius . panel ( c ) : enclosed gas mass as a function of radius . panel ( d ) : specific angular momentum as a function of enclosed mass . panel ( e ) : keplerian velocity fraction as a function of radius . panel ( f ) : gas rms mach number as a function of radius . all quantities except enclosed gas mass are mass - weighted , and all simulations are shown at the point where the maximum number density is approximately @xmath135 @xmath4 . line types and weights correspond to simulations , as follows . black solid line : j@xmath68 . black short - dashed line : j@xmath140 . black long - dashed line : j@xmath141 . black dot short - dashed line : j@xmath142 . black dot long - dashed line : j@xmath80 . black short dashed - long dashed line : j@xmath143 . red solid line : j@xmath144 . red short - dashed line : j@xmath145 . red long - dashed line : j@xmath1 . , title="fig:",scaledwidth=30.0% ] . panel ( a ) : @xmath139 as a function of radius . panel ( b ) : temperature as a function of radius . panel ( c ) : enclosed gas mass as a function of radius . panel ( d ) : specific angular momentum as a function of enclosed mass . panel ( e ) : keplerian velocity fraction as a function of radius . panel ( f ) : gas rms mach number as a function of radius . all quantities except enclosed gas mass are mass - weighted , and all simulations are shown at the point where the maximum number density is approximately @xmath135 @xmath4 . line types and weights correspond to simulations , as follows . black solid line : j@xmath68 . black short - dashed line : j@xmath140 . black long - dashed line : j@xmath141 . black dot short - dashed line : j@xmath142 . black dot long - dashed line : j@xmath80 . black short dashed - long dashed line : j@xmath143 . red solid line : j@xmath144 . red short - dashed line : j@xmath145 . red long - dashed line : j@xmath1 . , title="fig:",scaledwidth=30.0% ] . panel ( a ) : @xmath139 as a function of radius . panel ( b ) : temperature as a function of radius . panel ( c ) : enclosed gas mass as a function of radius . panel ( d ) : specific angular momentum as a function of enclosed mass . panel ( e ) : keplerian velocity fraction as a function of radius . panel ( f ) : gas rms mach number as a function of radius . all quantities except enclosed gas mass are mass - weighted , and all simulations are shown at the point where the maximum number density is approximately @xmath135 @xmath4 . line types and weights correspond to simulations , as follows . black solid line : j@xmath68 . black short - dashed line : j@xmath140 . black long - dashed line : j@xmath141 . black dot short - dashed line : j@xmath142 . black dot long - dashed line : j@xmath80 . black short dashed - long dashed line : j@xmath143 . red solid line : j@xmath144 . red short - dashed line : j@xmath145 . red long - dashed line : j@xmath1 . , title="fig:",scaledwidth=30.0% ] . panel ( a ) : @xmath139 as a function of radius . panel ( b ) : temperature as a function of radius . panel ( c ) : enclosed gas mass as a function of radius . panel ( d ) : specific angular momentum as a function of enclosed mass . panel ( e ) : keplerian velocity fraction as a function of radius . panel ( f ) : gas rms mach number as a function of radius . all quantities except enclosed gas mass are mass - weighted , and all simulations are shown at the point where the maximum number density is approximately @xmath135 @xmath4 . line types and weights correspond to simulations , as follows . black solid line : j@xmath68 . black short - dashed line : j@xmath140 . black long - dashed line : j@xmath141 . black dot short - dashed line : j@xmath142 . black dot long - dashed line : j@xmath80 . black short dashed - long dashed line : j@xmath143 . red solid line : j@xmath144 . red short - dashed line : j@xmath145 . red long - dashed line : j@xmath1 . , title="fig:",scaledwidth=30.0% ] . panel ( a ) : @xmath139 as a function of radius . panel ( b ) : temperature as a function of radius . panel ( c ) : enclosed gas mass as a function of radius . panel ( d ) : specific angular momentum as a function of enclosed mass . panel ( e ) : keplerian velocity fraction as a function of radius . panel ( f ) : gas rms mach number as a function of radius . all quantities except enclosed gas mass are mass - weighted , and all simulations are shown at the point where the maximum number density is approximately @xmath135 @xmath4 . line types and weights correspond to simulations , as follows . black solid line : j@xmath68 . black short - dashed line : j@xmath140 . black long - dashed line : j@xmath141 . black dot short - dashed line : j@xmath142 . black dot long - dashed line : j@xmath80 . black short dashed - long dashed line : j@xmath143 . red solid line : j@xmath144 . red short - dashed line : j@xmath145 . red long - dashed line : j@xmath1 . , title="fig:",scaledwidth=30.0% ] figure [ fig.radprof_zcoll.2 ] shows the h@xmath13 fraction , electron fraction , h@xmath120 fraction , ratio of cooling time to sound crossing time , ratio of cooling time to dynamical time , and ratio of sound crossing time to dynamical time as a function of radius , for all simulations . outputs and line types correspond to those in figure [ fig.radprof_zcoll.1 ] . there is a clear relationship at all radii between h@xmath13 fraction and uv background strength in panel ( a ) as the fuv background is increased , the overall h@xmath13 fraction decreases . this difference is most noticeable at radii of @xmath146 pc , but is maintained at larger and smaller radii . there is a `` kink '' at approximately @xmath101 pc where the values are all quite similar . this corresponds to a baryon number density of @xmath36 @xmath4 in all simulations , which is where 3-body h@xmath13 formation begins to occur . panels ( b ) and ( c ) show that e@xmath120 and @xmath29 fractions track each other , which is to be expected the local electron fraction controls the amount of h@xmath120 which can be produced , which is the limiting reaction in the dominant mode of h@xmath13 formation for n @xmath147 @xmath4 and there is a general trend with increasing electron and h@xmath120 fractions with increasing uv background flux . the plots of the ratio of cooling time to sound crossing time , ratio of cooling time to dynamical time , and ratio of sound crossing time to dynamical time as a function of radius shown in panels ( d ) , ( e ) and ( f ) display some interesting trends . the three simulations with the lowest uv background strengths have a much longer cooling time than the other calculations , which are all grouped roughly together with no discernible pattern . this agrees well with the plot of the ratio of cooling time to dynamical time , where a similar trend is observed . the difference between the three simulations with the lowest uv background strengths and the others is due to the somewhat higher h@xmath13 fraction in the halo core of these calculations . the gas temperature is @xmath148 k at the center of the halo cores in these calculations , and the gas can not cool further , which results in a very long cooling time . the sound crossing time is also increased , but not as significantly . all simulations have approximately the same ratio of sound crossing to dynamical times at all radii . given that the cooling time is typically longer than both the sound crossing time and dynamical time , one can infer that the collapse of the halo is occurring quasi - statically for all simulations . . panel ( a ) : molecular hydrogen fraction as a function of radius . panel ( b ) : electron fraction as a function of radius . panel ( c ) : @xmath29 fraction as a function of radius . panel ( d ) : ratio of gas cooling time to sound crossing time as a function of radius . panel ( e ) : ratio of gas cooling time to dynamical time as a function of radius . panel ( f ) : ratio of gas sound crossing time to dynamical time as a function of radius . all quantities except enclosed gas mass are mass - weighted , and all simulations are shown at the point where the maximum number density is approximately @xmath135 @xmath4 . line types and weights correspond to those in figure [ fig.radprof_zcoll.1 ] . , title="fig:",scaledwidth=30.0% ] . panel ( a ) : molecular hydrogen fraction as a function of radius . panel ( b ) : electron fraction as a function of radius . panel ( c ) : @xmath29 fraction as a function of radius . panel ( d ) : ratio of gas cooling time to sound crossing time as a function of radius . panel ( e ) : ratio of gas cooling time to dynamical time as a function of radius . panel ( f ) : ratio of gas sound crossing time to dynamical time as a function of radius . all quantities except enclosed gas mass are mass - weighted , and all simulations are shown at the point where the maximum number density is approximately @xmath135 @xmath4 . line types and weights correspond to those in figure [ fig.radprof_zcoll.1 ] . , title="fig:",scaledwidth=30.0% ] . panel ( a ) : molecular hydrogen fraction as a function of radius . panel ( b ) : electron fraction as a function of radius . panel ( c ) : @xmath29 fraction as a function of radius . panel ( d ) : ratio of gas cooling time to sound crossing time as a function of radius . panel ( e ) : ratio of gas cooling time to dynamical time as a function of radius . panel ( f ) : ratio of gas sound crossing time to dynamical time as a function of radius . all quantities except enclosed gas mass are mass - weighted , and all simulations are shown at the point where the maximum number density is approximately @xmath135 @xmath4 . line types and weights correspond to those in figure [ fig.radprof_zcoll.1 ] . , title="fig:",scaledwidth=30.0% ] . panel ( a ) : molecular hydrogen fraction as a function of radius . panel ( b ) : electron fraction as a function of radius . panel ( c ) : @xmath29 fraction as a function of radius . panel ( d ) : ratio of gas cooling time to sound crossing time as a function of radius . panel ( e ) : ratio of gas cooling time to dynamical time as a function of radius . panel ( f ) : ratio of gas sound crossing time to dynamical time as a function of radius . all quantities except enclosed gas mass are mass - weighted , and all simulations are shown at the point where the maximum number density is approximately @xmath135 @xmath4 . line types and weights correspond to those in figure [ fig.radprof_zcoll.1 ] . , title="fig:",scaledwidth=30.0% ] . panel ( a ) : molecular hydrogen fraction as a function of radius . panel ( b ) : electron fraction as a function of radius . panel ( c ) : @xmath29 fraction as a function of radius . panel ( d ) : ratio of gas cooling time to sound crossing time as a function of radius . panel ( e ) : ratio of gas cooling time to dynamical time as a function of radius . panel ( f ) : ratio of gas sound crossing time to dynamical time as a function of radius . all quantities except enclosed gas mass are mass - weighted , and all simulations are shown at the point where the maximum number density is approximately @xmath135 @xmath4 . line types and weights correspond to those in figure [ fig.radprof_zcoll.1 ] . , title="fig:",scaledwidth=30.0% ] . panel ( a ) : molecular hydrogen fraction as a function of radius . panel ( b ) : electron fraction as a function of radius . panel ( c ) : @xmath29 fraction as a function of radius . panel ( d ) : ratio of gas cooling time to sound crossing time as a function of radius . panel ( e ) : ratio of gas cooling time to dynamical time as a function of radius . panel ( f ) : ratio of gas sound crossing time to dynamical time as a function of radius . all quantities except enclosed gas mass are mass - weighted , and all simulations are shown at the point where the maximum number density is approximately @xmath135 @xmath4 . line types and weights correspond to those in figure [ fig.radprof_zcoll.1 ] . , title="fig:",scaledwidth=30.0% ] figure [ fig.radprof_zcoll.3 ] shows radial velocity as a function of radius , accretion time ( defined as @xmath149 ) as a function of enclosed baryon mass @xmath150 as a function of enclosed baryon mass and @xmath150 as a function of time for all simulations . output time and lines correspond to those in figures [ fig.radprof_zcoll.1 ] and [ fig.radprof_zcoll.2 ] . panel ( a ) shows a clear relationship between the strength of the soft uv background and the radial velocity , with the calculations that have higher uv backgrounds also having higher infall velocities . this is easily understood by the quasistatic contraction of the gas , which takes place at or below the local sound speed in the gas , as discussed by ( 2002 ) and & norman ( 2007 ) . given that the halo temperatures are systematically higher in calculations where the uv background is stronger , the sound speed is higher , and thus the rate at which the gas at the center of the halo contracts is higher . this leads to lower accretion times ( panel ( b ) ) and higher accretion rates ( panel ( c ) ) , with the accretion rates for the simulations with the strongest uv backgrounds being higher than those with a low ( or no ) uv background . panel ( d ) shows that the time evolution of the accretion rate in all simulations is qualitatively similar , but varies strongly in absolute magnitude and in the time at which the accretion rate onto the evolving protostellar cloud peaks , suggesting that the stars forming in these simulations may have very different evolutionary histories . . panel ( a ) : radial velocity as a function of radius . panel ( b ) : accretion time as a function of enclosed baryon mass . panel ( c ) : instantaneous accretion rate as a function of enclosed baryon mass . panel ( d ) : estimated accretion rate as a function of time . all quantities except enclosed gas mass are mass - weighted , and all simulations are shown at the point where the maximum number density is approximately @xmath135 @xmath4 . line types and weights correspond to those in figure [ fig.radprof_zcoll.1 ] . the upper and lower light short - long - dashed curves which extend from the upper left corner of panel ( b ) correspond to the main sequence lifetime of a massive population iii star of that mass and the kelvin - helmholtz timescale of a population iii timescale with a given luminosity and radius . all values are taken from ( 2002 ) . the three light diagonal short - dashed lines which extend from bottom left to top right in panel ( b ) correspond to masses accreted using constant accretion rates of ( from top to bottom ) @xmath151 , @xmath101 , and @xmath81 m@xmath152yr . the light horizontal short - dashed line in panels ( c ) and ( d ) correspond to the `` critical '' accretion rate of & palla ( 2003 ) , @xmath153 m@xmath152yr . , title="fig:",scaledwidth=45.0% ] . panel ( a ) : radial velocity as a function of radius . panel ( b ) : accretion time as a function of enclosed baryon mass . panel ( c ) : instantaneous accretion rate as a function of enclosed baryon mass . panel ( d ) : estimated accretion rate as a function of time . all quantities except enclosed gas mass are mass - weighted , and all simulations are shown at the point where the maximum number density is approximately @xmath135 @xmath4 . line types and weights correspond to those in figure [ fig.radprof_zcoll.1 ] . the upper and lower light short - long - dashed curves which extend from the upper left corner of panel ( b ) correspond to the main sequence lifetime of a massive population iii star of that mass and the kelvin - helmholtz timescale of a population iii timescale with a given luminosity and radius . all values are taken from ( 2002 ) . the three light diagonal short - dashed lines which extend from bottom left to top right in panel ( b ) correspond to masses accreted using constant accretion rates of ( from top to bottom ) @xmath151 , @xmath101 , and @xmath81 m@xmath152yr . the light horizontal short - dashed line in panels ( c ) and ( d ) correspond to the `` critical '' accretion rate of & palla ( 2003 ) , @xmath153 m@xmath152yr . , title="fig:",scaledwidth=45.0% ] . panel ( a ) : radial velocity as a function of radius . panel ( b ) : accretion time as a function of enclosed baryon mass . panel ( c ) : instantaneous accretion rate as a function of enclosed baryon mass . panel ( d ) : estimated accretion rate as a function of time . all quantities except enclosed gas mass are mass - weighted , and all simulations are shown at the point where the maximum number density is approximately @xmath135 @xmath4 . line types and weights correspond to those in figure [ fig.radprof_zcoll.1 ] . the upper and lower light short - long - dashed curves which extend from the upper left corner of panel ( b ) correspond to the main sequence lifetime of a massive population iii star of that mass and the kelvin - helmholtz timescale of a population iii timescale with a given luminosity and radius . all values are taken from ( 2002 ) . the three light diagonal short - dashed lines which extend from bottom left to top right in panel ( b ) correspond to masses accreted using constant accretion rates of ( from top to bottom ) @xmath151 , @xmath101 , and @xmath81 m@xmath152yr . the light horizontal short - dashed line in panels ( c ) and ( d ) correspond to the `` critical '' accretion rate of & palla ( 2003 ) , @xmath153 m@xmath152yr . , title="fig:",scaledwidth=45.0% ] . panel ( a ) : radial velocity as a function of radius . panel ( b ) : accretion time as a function of enclosed baryon mass . panel ( c ) : instantaneous accretion rate as a function of enclosed baryon mass . panel ( d ) : estimated accretion rate as a function of time . all quantities except enclosed gas mass are mass - weighted , and all simulations are shown at the point where the maximum number density is approximately @xmath135 @xmath4 . line types and weights correspond to those in figure [ fig.radprof_zcoll.1 ] . the upper and lower light short - long - dashed curves which extend from the upper left corner of panel ( b ) correspond to the main sequence lifetime of a massive population iii star of that mass and the kelvin - helmholtz timescale of a population iii timescale with a given luminosity and radius . all values are taken from ( 2002 ) . the three light diagonal short - dashed lines which extend from bottom left to top right in panel ( b ) correspond to masses accreted using constant accretion rates of ( from top to bottom ) @xmath151 , @xmath101 , and @xmath81 m@xmath152yr . the light horizontal short - dashed line in panels ( c ) and ( d ) correspond to the `` critical '' accretion rate of & palla ( 2003 ) , @xmath153 m@xmath152yr . , title="fig:",scaledwidth=45.0% ] figure [ fig.radprof_fixred.1 ] shows the status of several spherically - averaged quantities for halos from all simulations at a fixed redshift , @xmath154 , which is shortly before the baryons in the most massive halo in the j@xmath68 simulation collapses to high density . this is at an early point in the evolution of the majority of these halos , and several conclusions can be drawn from the plots of number density , temperature , h@xmath13 fraction , and radial velocity as a function of radius . the molecular hydrogen fraction declines monotonically with increasing uv background strength , in agreement with an estimate for equilibrium h@xmath13 fraction at low ( @xmath155 @xmath4 ) densities : @xmath156 where k@xmath119 is the rate coefficient for the formation of h@xmath120 ( the limiting reaction for h@xmath13 formation at the temperature and density range considered here ) and k@xmath52 is the rate coefficient for h@xmath13 in the lw band ( abel et al . 1997 ; yoshida et al . halo cores at higher central densities are departing from the approximations used in the above estimate and thus have values of the h@xmath13 fraction that are not quite the equilibrium values . halo cores which have reached core h@xmath13 fractions higher than @xmath157 have been able to cool to significantly below the virial temperature ( since the cooling time is much less than the hubble time at that value of the h@xmath13 fraction ) , allowing the baryon density to increase . the effect of cooling can also be seen in the plot of radial velocity as a function of radius , where the core regions of halos that have cooled are contracting ( albeit very slowly ) , while those which are still at the virial temperature are not showing significant signs of contraction within @xmath158 pc . all halos have some inflow at large radii , due to the infall of gas from adjoining filaments . . panel ( a ) : number density as a function of radius . panel ( b ) : temperature as a function of radius . panel ( c ) : @xmath31 fraction as a function of radius . panel ( d ) : radial velocity as a function of radius . all quantities except enclosed gas mass are mass - weighted , and all simulations are shown at @xmath154 ( shortly before the j@xmath68 simulation collapses to high density . line types and weights correspond to simulations , as follows . black solid line : j@xmath159 . black short - dashed line : j@xmath140 . black long - dashed line : j@xmath141 . black dot short - dashed line : j@xmath142 . black dot long - dashed line : j@xmath80 . black short dashed - long dashed line : j@xmath143 . red solid line : j@xmath144 . red short - dashed line : j@xmath145 . red long - dashed line : j@xmath1 . , title="fig:",scaledwidth=45.0% ] . panel ( a ) : number density as a function of radius . panel ( b ) : temperature as a function of radius . panel ( c ) : @xmath31 fraction as a function of radius . panel ( d ) : radial velocity as a function of radius . all quantities except enclosed gas mass are mass - weighted , and all simulations are shown at @xmath154 ( shortly before the j@xmath68 simulation collapses to high density . line types and weights correspond to simulations , as follows . black solid line : j@xmath159 . black short - dashed line : j@xmath140 . black long - dashed line : j@xmath141 . black dot short - dashed line : j@xmath142 . black dot long - dashed line : j@xmath80 . black short dashed - long dashed line : j@xmath143 . red solid line : j@xmath144 . red short - dashed line : j@xmath145 . red long - dashed line : j@xmath1 . , title="fig:",scaledwidth=45.0% ] . panel ( a ) : number density as a function of radius . panel ( b ) : temperature as a function of radius . panel ( c ) : @xmath31 fraction as a function of radius . panel ( d ) : radial velocity as a function of radius . all quantities except enclosed gas mass are mass - weighted , and all simulations are shown at @xmath154 ( shortly before the j@xmath68 simulation collapses to high density . line types and weights correspond to simulations , as follows . black solid line : j@xmath159 . black short - dashed line : j@xmath140 . black long - dashed line : j@xmath141 . black dot short - dashed line : j@xmath142 . black dot long - dashed line : j@xmath80 . black short dashed - long dashed line : j@xmath143 . red solid line : j@xmath144 . red short - dashed line : j@xmath145 . red long - dashed line : j@xmath1 . , title="fig:",scaledwidth=45.0% ] . panel ( a ) : number density as a function of radius . panel ( b ) : temperature as a function of radius . panel ( c ) : @xmath31 fraction as a function of radius . panel ( d ) : radial velocity as a function of radius . all quantities except enclosed gas mass are mass - weighted , and all simulations are shown at @xmath154 ( shortly before the j@xmath68 simulation collapses to high density . line types and weights correspond to simulations , as follows . black solid line : j@xmath159 . black short - dashed line : j@xmath140 . black long - dashed line : j@xmath141 . black dot short - dashed line : j@xmath142 . black dot long - dashed line : j@xmath80 . black short dashed - long dashed line : j@xmath143 . red solid line : j@xmath144 . red short - dashed line : j@xmath145 . red long - dashed line : j@xmath1 . , title="fig:",scaledwidth=45.0% ] in this section we compare the evolution of two representative simulations . we choose the calculations which correspond to j@xmath68 and @xmath90 . these two simulations represent the extremes in halo evolution the j@xmath68 calculation is an example of the evolution of a `` standard '' halo , as discussed in previous literature , and the j@xmath1 simulation is the most extreme example of a population iii protostar forming in a t@xmath5 k halo available from our suite of calculations . as described in section [ sect.simsetup ] , both calculations start from the same initial conditions , with only the strength of the lw background being different . projections of the log baryon density and temperature for the j@xmath68 and @xmath90 simulations are shown in figures [ fig.image_jlw_0 ] and [ fig.image_jlw_1em21 ] , respectively . these projections are at the epoch of collapse , which is @xmath160 @xmath161 for the j@xmath68 @xmath162 simulation . the halo masses are significantly different : @xmath163 and @xmath164 m@xmath15 for the two calculations , reflecting the rapid pace of mergers at that redshift , and the amount of structure evolution that takes place over that relatively short time period ( @xmath165 years ) . this can clearly be seen in the left column of both figures , when the large amount of structure apparent in figure [ fig.image_jlw_0 ] has merged into the main halo by the time of protostellar cloud formation in the j@xmath1 case , as seen in figure [ fig.image_jlw_1em21 ] . despite the differences in evolutionary states , the halos themselves are quite similar in figures [ fig.image_jlw_0 ] and [ fig.image_jlw_1em21 ] . both calculations show halos that are strongly centrally concentrated , as shown by the center column in both figures . this column shows projections of the halos which are centered on the baryon peak and are approximately one virial radius across ( and thus are scaled differently in both images ) . no fragmentation of the halo core is visible . the rightmost panel in both calculations shows the center of the halo , where the protostellar cloud is evolving . there is still no evidence for fragmentation up to a central baryon density of @xmath3 @xmath4 . figures [ fig.radprof_jlw0.1 ] and [ fig.radprof_jlw1em21.1 ] show the temporal evolution of several spherically - averaged baryon quantities for the j@xmath68 and @xmath90 calculations , respectively . these plots show baryon number density , enclosed baryon mass , temperature , h@xmath13 fraction , ratio of cooling time to sound crossing time , and ratio of cooling time to dynamical time , as a function of radius , evolving from a number density of @xmath166 @xmath4 to @xmath69 @xmath4 in both calculations . some qualitative commonalities are obvious between the two calculations . both halos steadily grow in central density ( panel ( a ) ) , which is coupled to the growing molecular hydrogen fraction in the central region of the halo ( panel ( d ) ) . both halos collapse quasi - statically , as shown in panels ( e ) and ( f ) . also , the temperature profiles ( as shown in panel ( c ) ) are broadly similar , in that the gas in the halo central region cools to some minimum value at r @xmath167 pc ( corresponding to n @xmath168 @xmath4 in both simulations ) and then creeps steadily upward as gas collapses to higher densities . though there are qualitative similarities between the evolution of the two calculations , detailed examination shows some significant quantitative differences . the time that the halo in the j@xmath68 simulation takes to evolve from a central density of @xmath169 @xmath4 to @xmath135 @xmath4 is @xmath170 myr , with 21 myr of that being the time required to evolve from @xmath169 to n @xmath171 @xmath4 . the time required for the j@xmath1 calculation to evolve from @xmath169 @xmath4 to @xmath135 @xmath4 is slightly shorter , @xmath60 17 myrs , with 8 myrs required to evolve to n @xmath172 @xmath4 . the temperature evolution is also somewhat different the j@xmath68 simulation has a minimum temperature at r @xmath137 pc of 200 k , with n @xmath171@xmath173 and a molecular hydrogen fraction of @xmath174 , and roughly 1000 m@xmath15 of enclosed gas . as the gas within this radius evolves to higher densities , the temperature increases by a factor of a few , peaking at t @xmath175 k at n @xmath176 @xmath4 , with f@xmath177 . the gas cooling time within r @xmath137 pc in the j@xmath68 simulation is always larger than the sound crossing and dynamical times by at least a factor of two , implying a quasistatic gas contraction at all times . the j@xmath1 simulation evolves somewhat differently . the collapsing gas reaches a minimum temperature of @xmath178 k at r @xmath179 pc , with a baryon density of @xmath180 @xmath4 , an enclosed gas mass of roughly @xmath86 m@xmath15 , and a molecular hydrogen fraction of @xmath181 , two orders of magnitude below that in the j@xmath68 calculation at the equivalent temperature minimum . the low h@xmath13 fraction is due to the high lw background radiation flux . as the halo evolves to higher densities , the gas temperature and h@xmath13 fraction also creep upwards . the temperature of the gas when the peak reaches roughly @xmath135 @xmath4 is @xmath182 k , with a h@xmath13 fraction of @xmath183 . the cooling time at r @xmath179 pc is an order of magnitude higher than the sound crossing or dynamical times , implying an extremely slow contraction of the gas at that radius . as the central density increases , however , the cooling time becomes lower , with t@xmath184/t@xmath185 and t@xmath184/t@xmath186 dipping to @xmath187 at its minimum , but the latter increasing toward the central density peak to a ratio of @xmath188 . this implies a more rapid contraction of gas in the halo center in the simulation with a higher uv background , despite the lack of molecular hydrogen . it is also worth noticing that the j@xmath1 calculation has h@xmath13 fractions at n @xmath168 and @xmath106 @xmath4 of @xmath189 and @xmath190 , respectively , as compared to f@xmath191 and @xmath192 at the same densities in the j@xmath68 calculation . panel ( a ) : number density as a function of radius . panel ( b ) : enclosed gas mass as a function of radius . panel ( c ) : temperature as a function of radius . panel ( d ) : @xmath31 fraction as a function of radius . panel ( e ) : ratio of cooling time to sound crossing time as a function of radius . panel ( f ) : ratio of cooling time to dynamical time as a function of radius . all quantities except enclosed gas mass are mass - weighted . line types and weights correspond to different times , as follows . red short dashed - long dashed line : @xmath193 , @xmath194 years . red dot long - dashed line : @xmath195 , @xmath196 years . red dot short - dashed line : @xmath197 , @xmath196 years . red long - dashed line : @xmath198 , @xmath199 years . red short - dashed line : @xmath200 , @xmath201 years . red solid line : @xmath202 , @xmath203 years . black short dashed - long dashed line : @xmath204 , @xmath205 years . black dot long - dashed line : @xmath206 , @xmath207 years . black dot short - dashed line : @xmath208 , @xmath209 years . black long - dashed line : @xmath210 , @xmath211 years . black short - dashed line : @xmath212 , @xmath213 years . black solid line : @xmath214 , @xmath215 years . , title="fig:",scaledwidth=30.0% ] simulation . panel ( a ) : number density as a function of radius . panel ( b ) : enclosed gas mass as a function of radius . panel ( c ) : temperature as a function of radius . panel ( d ) : @xmath31 fraction as a function of radius . panel ( e ) : ratio of cooling time to sound crossing time as a function of radius . panel ( f ) : ratio of cooling time to dynamical time as a function of radius . all quantities except enclosed gas mass are mass - weighted . line types and weights correspond to different times , as follows . red short dashed - long dashed line : @xmath193 , @xmath194 years . red dot long - dashed line : @xmath195 , @xmath196 years . red dot short - dashed line : @xmath197 , @xmath196 years . red long - dashed line : @xmath198 , @xmath199 years . red short - dashed line : @xmath200 , @xmath201 years . red solid line : @xmath202 , @xmath203 years . black short dashed - long dashed line : @xmath204 , @xmath205 years . black dot long - dashed line : @xmath206 , @xmath207 years . black dot short - dashed line : @xmath208 , @xmath209 years . black long - dashed line : @xmath210 , @xmath211 years . black short - dashed line : @xmath212 , @xmath213 years . black solid line : @xmath214 , @xmath215 years . , title="fig:",scaledwidth=30.0% ] simulation . panel ( a ) : number density as a function of radius . panel ( b ) : enclosed gas mass as a function of radius . panel ( c ) : temperature as a function of radius . panel ( d ) : @xmath31 fraction as a function of radius . panel ( e ) : ratio of cooling time to sound crossing time as a function of radius . panel ( f ) : ratio of cooling time to dynamical time as a function of radius . all quantities except enclosed gas mass are mass - weighted . line types and weights correspond to different times , as follows . red short dashed - long dashed line : @xmath193 , @xmath194 years . red dot long - dashed line : @xmath195 , @xmath196 years . red dot short - dashed line : @xmath197 , @xmath196 years . red long - dashed line : @xmath198 , @xmath199 years . red short - dashed line : @xmath200 , @xmath201 years . red solid line : @xmath202 , @xmath203 years . black short dashed - long dashed line : @xmath204 , @xmath205 years . black dot long - dashed line : @xmath206 , @xmath207 years . black dot short - dashed line : @xmath208 , @xmath209 years . black long - dashed line : @xmath210 , @xmath211 years . black short - dashed line : @xmath212 , @xmath213 years . black solid line : @xmath214 , @xmath215 years . , title="fig:",scaledwidth=30.0% ] simulation . panel ( a ) : number density as a function of radius . panel ( b ) : enclosed gas mass as a function of radius . panel ( c ) : temperature as a function of radius . panel ( d ) : @xmath31 fraction as a function of radius . panel ( e ) : ratio of cooling time to sound crossing time as a function of radius . panel ( f ) : ratio of cooling time to dynamical time as a function of radius . all quantities except enclosed gas mass are mass - weighted . line types and weights correspond to different times , as follows . red short dashed - long dashed line : @xmath193 , @xmath194 years . red dot long - dashed line : @xmath195 , @xmath196 years . red dot short - dashed line : @xmath197 , @xmath196 years . red long - dashed line : @xmath198 , @xmath199 years . red short - dashed line : @xmath200 , @xmath201 years . red solid line : @xmath202 , @xmath203 years . black short dashed - long dashed line : @xmath204 , @xmath205 years . black dot long - dashed line : @xmath206 , @xmath207 years . black dot short - dashed line : @xmath208 , @xmath209 years . black long - dashed line : @xmath210 , @xmath211 years . black short - dashed line : @xmath212 , @xmath213 years . black solid line : @xmath214 , @xmath215 years . , title="fig:",scaledwidth=30.0% ] simulation . panel ( a ) : number density as a function of radius . panel ( b ) : enclosed gas mass as a function of radius . panel ( c ) : temperature as a function of radius . panel ( d ) : @xmath31 fraction as a function of radius . panel ( e ) : ratio of cooling time to sound crossing time as a function of radius . panel ( f ) : ratio of cooling time to dynamical time as a function of radius . all quantities except enclosed gas mass are mass - weighted . line types and weights correspond to different times , as follows . red short dashed - long dashed line : @xmath193 , @xmath194 years . red dot long - dashed line : @xmath195 , @xmath196 years . red dot short - dashed line : @xmath197 , @xmath196 years . red long - dashed line : @xmath198 , @xmath199 years . red short - dashed line : @xmath200 , @xmath201 years . red solid line : @xmath202 , @xmath203 years . black short dashed - long dashed line : @xmath204 , @xmath205 years . black dot long - dashed line : @xmath206 , @xmath207 years . black dot short - dashed line : @xmath208 , @xmath209 years . black long - dashed line : @xmath210 , @xmath211 years . black short - dashed line : @xmath212 , @xmath213 years . black solid line : @xmath214 , @xmath215 years . , title="fig:",scaledwidth=30.0% ] simulation . panel ( a ) : number density as a function of radius . panel ( b ) : enclosed gas mass as a function of radius . panel ( c ) : temperature as a function of radius . panel ( d ) : @xmath31 fraction as a function of radius . panel ( e ) : ratio of cooling time to sound crossing time as a function of radius . panel ( f ) : ratio of cooling time to dynamical time as a function of radius . all quantities except enclosed gas mass are mass - weighted . line types and weights correspond to different times , as follows . red short dashed - long dashed line : @xmath193 , @xmath194 years . red dot long - dashed line : @xmath195 , @xmath196 years . red dot short - dashed line : @xmath197 , @xmath196 years . red long - dashed line : @xmath198 , @xmath199 years . red short - dashed line : @xmath200 , @xmath201 years . red solid line : @xmath202 , @xmath203 years . black short dashed - long dashed line : @xmath204 , @xmath205 years . black dot long - dashed line : @xmath206 , @xmath207 years . black dot short - dashed line : @xmath208 , @xmath209 years . black long - dashed line : @xmath210 , @xmath211 years . black short - dashed line : @xmath212 , @xmath213 years . black solid line : @xmath214 , @xmath215 years . , title="fig:",scaledwidth=30.0% ] simulation . panel ( a ) : number density as a function of radius . panel ( b ) : enclosed gas mass as a function of radius . panel ( c ) : temperature as a function of radius . panel ( d ) : @xmath31 fraction as a function of radius . panel ( e ) : ratio of cooling time to sound crossing time as a function of radius . panel ( f ) : ratio of cooling time to dynamical time as a function of radius . all quantities except enclosed gas mass are mass - weighted . line types and weights correspond to different times , as follows . red short dashed - long dashed line : @xmath216 , @xmath217 years . red dot long - dashed line : @xmath218 , @xmath219 years . red dot short - dashed line : @xmath220 , @xmath221 years . red long - dashed line : @xmath222 , @xmath223 years . red short - dashed line : @xmath224 , @xmath225 years . red solid line : @xmath226 , @xmath227 years . black short dashed - long dashed line : @xmath228 , @xmath229 years . black dot long - dashed line : @xmath230 , @xmath231 years . black dot short - dashed line : @xmath232 , @xmath233 years . black long - dashed line : @xmath234 , @xmath235 years . black short - dashed line : @xmath236 , @xmath237 years . black solid line : @xmath238 , @xmath239 years . , title="fig:",scaledwidth=30.0% ] simulation . panel ( a ) : number density as a function of radius . panel ( b ) : enclosed gas mass as a function of radius . panel ( c ) : temperature as a function of radius . panel ( d ) : @xmath31 fraction as a function of radius . panel ( e ) : ratio of cooling time to sound crossing time as a function of radius . panel ( f ) : ratio of cooling time to dynamical time as a function of radius . all quantities except enclosed gas mass are mass - weighted . line types and weights correspond to different times , as follows . red short dashed - long dashed line : @xmath216 , @xmath217 years . red dot long - dashed line : @xmath218 , @xmath219 years . red dot short - dashed line : @xmath220 , @xmath221 years . red long - dashed line : @xmath222 , @xmath223 years . red short - dashed line : @xmath224 , @xmath225 years . red solid line : @xmath226 , @xmath227 years . black short dashed - long dashed line : @xmath228 , @xmath229 years . black dot long - dashed line : @xmath230 , @xmath231 years . black dot short - dashed line : @xmath232 , @xmath233 years . black long - dashed line : @xmath234 , @xmath235 years . black short - dashed line : @xmath236 , @xmath237 years . black solid line : @xmath238 , @xmath239 years . , title="fig:",scaledwidth=30.0% ] simulation . panel ( a ) : number density as a function of radius . panel ( b ) : enclosed gas mass as a function of radius . panel ( c ) : temperature as a function of radius . panel ( d ) : @xmath31 fraction as a function of radius . panel ( e ) : ratio of cooling time to sound crossing time as a function of radius . panel ( f ) : ratio of cooling time to dynamical time as a function of radius . all quantities except enclosed gas mass are mass - weighted . line types and weights correspond to different times , as follows . red short dashed - long dashed line : @xmath216 , @xmath217 years . red dot long - dashed line : @xmath218 , @xmath219 years . red dot short - dashed line : @xmath220 , @xmath221 years . red long - dashed line : @xmath222 , @xmath223 years . red short - dashed line : @xmath224 , @xmath225 years . red solid line : @xmath226 , @xmath227 years . black short dashed - long dashed line : @xmath228 , @xmath229 years . black dot long - dashed line : @xmath230 , @xmath231 years . black dot short - dashed line : @xmath232 , @xmath233 years . black long - dashed line : @xmath234 , @xmath235 years . black short - dashed line : @xmath236 , @xmath237 years . black solid line : @xmath238 , @xmath239 years . , title="fig:",scaledwidth=30.0% ] simulation . panel ( a ) : number density as a function of radius . panel ( b ) : enclosed gas mass as a function of radius . panel ( c ) : temperature as a function of radius . panel ( d ) : @xmath31 fraction as a function of radius . panel ( e ) : ratio of cooling time to sound crossing time as a function of radius . panel ( f ) : ratio of cooling time to dynamical time as a function of radius . all quantities except enclosed gas mass are mass - weighted . line types and weights correspond to different times , as follows . red short dashed - long dashed line : @xmath216 , @xmath217 years . red dot long - dashed line : @xmath218 , @xmath219 years . red dot short - dashed line : @xmath220 , @xmath221 years . red long - dashed line : @xmath222 , @xmath223 years . red short - dashed line : @xmath224 , @xmath225 years . red solid line : @xmath226 , @xmath227 years . black short dashed - long dashed line : @xmath228 , @xmath229 years . black dot long - dashed line : @xmath230 , @xmath231 years . black dot short - dashed line : @xmath232 , @xmath233 years . black long - dashed line : @xmath234 , @xmath235 years . black short - dashed line : @xmath236 , @xmath237 years . black solid line : @xmath238 , @xmath239 years . , title="fig:",scaledwidth=30.0% ] simulation . panel ( a ) : number density as a function of radius . panel ( b ) : enclosed gas mass as a function of radius . panel ( c ) : temperature as a function of radius . panel ( d ) : @xmath31 fraction as a function of radius . panel ( e ) : ratio of cooling time to sound crossing time as a function of radius . panel ( f ) : ratio of cooling time to dynamical time as a function of radius . all quantities except enclosed gas mass are mass - weighted . line types and weights correspond to different times , as follows . red short dashed - long dashed line : @xmath216 , @xmath217 years . red dot long - dashed line : @xmath218 , @xmath219 years . red dot short - dashed line : @xmath220 , @xmath221 years . red long - dashed line : @xmath222 , @xmath223 years . red short - dashed line : @xmath224 , @xmath225 years . red solid line : @xmath226 , @xmath227 years . black short dashed - long dashed line : @xmath228 , @xmath229 years . black dot long - dashed line : @xmath230 , @xmath231 years . black dot short - dashed line : @xmath232 , @xmath233 years . black long - dashed line : @xmath234 , @xmath235 years . black short - dashed line : @xmath236 , @xmath237 years . black solid line : @xmath238 , @xmath239 years . , title="fig:",scaledwidth=30.0% ] simulation . panel ( a ) : number density as a function of radius . panel ( b ) : enclosed gas mass as a function of radius . panel ( c ) : temperature as a function of radius . panel ( d ) : @xmath31 fraction as a function of radius . panel ( e ) : ratio of cooling time to sound crossing time as a function of radius . panel ( f ) : ratio of cooling time to dynamical time as a function of radius . all quantities except enclosed gas mass are mass - weighted . line types and weights correspond to different times , as follows . red short dashed - long dashed line : @xmath216 , @xmath217 years . red dot long - dashed line : @xmath218 , @xmath219 years . red dot short - dashed line : @xmath220 , @xmath221 years . red long - dashed line : @xmath222 , @xmath223 years . red short - dashed line : @xmath224 , @xmath225 years . red solid line : @xmath226 , @xmath227 years . black short dashed - long dashed line : @xmath228 , @xmath229 years . black dot long - dashed line : @xmath230 , @xmath231 years . black dot short - dashed line : @xmath232 , @xmath233 years . black long - dashed line : @xmath234 , @xmath235 years . black short - dashed line : @xmath236 , @xmath237 years . black solid line : @xmath238 , @xmath239 years . , title="fig:",scaledwidth=30.0% ] in this paper we have examined aspects of the formation of population iii stars in the presence of a soft ultraviolet background , using an adaptive mesh refinement cosmological structure formation code . given the nature of the tool and current limitations in computing power , some physics were neglected , and possible numerical issues may arise . we discuss this here . the primordial chemistry model used in these calculations ignores the effects of deuterium , lithium , and the various molecules that form between these elements and ordinary hydrogen . deuterium and lithium have been shown to be unimportant in the temperature and density regimes that we have examined in this paper ( galli & palla 1998 , 2002 ; lipovka , nez - lpez , & avila - reese 2005 ) . however , it is possible that they may be relevant in other situations of importance to population iii star formation in particular , regions which have been ionized to very high electron fractions may experience significant cooling from the hd molecule , which due to its permanent dipole moment makes it more than 100 times more effective as a cooling agent than molecular hydrogen ( per molecule ) , and has the potential to cool gas down to approximately the temperature of the cosmic microwave background , which scales with redshift as @xmath240 k ( flower et al . 2000 ; galli & palla 2002 ; lipovka et al . this gives a minimum baryon temperature of approximately @xmath241 kelvin at @xmath110 and could reduce the minimum accretion rate onto a primordial protostar significantly . lithium , while in principle an effective coolant as lih , is safely ignored , since only a tiny fraction of lithium is converted into lih ( mizusawa , omukai , & nishi 2005 ) . a final chemical process that is omitted from our calculation is heating caused by molecular hydrogen formation at high densities ( n @xmath242 @xmath4 ) , the inclusion of which may result in differences in the temperature evolution of the gas in the highest density regimes considered here . this does not significantly affect the conclusions of our paper , as the significant differences we observe between simulations occur at densities much lower than @xmath36 @xmath4 . self - shielding of the photodissociating background by molecular hydrogen in the high - density gas is ignored in these calculations . though this effect could in principle be important , the actual column densities of molecular hydrogen are typically far too small to actually block the soft uv flux . according to ( 2001 ) ( and references therein ) , a column density of @xmath243 @xmath11 is enough for shielding to become important . however , this was derived for a static distribution of h@xmath13 , while the lw band consists of hundreds of individual lines whose width in this case is dominated by doppler broadening . it is useful to note in this case that the average line width is @xmath179 km / s and the rms baryon velocity in our calculations are @xmath244 km / s . in order for self - shielding to be important in the case of a turbulent medium , the column density must be much higher . typical maximum h@xmath13 column densities in our calculations are on the order of @xmath245 @xmath11 , but these occur late in the collapse of the halo core , and in the highest density regions the cooling and h@xmath13 production times are much shorter than the photodissociation time scale , at which point self - shielding becomes unimportant . it is worth noting that there are some regimes where self - shileding can be critical . ( 2007 ) finds that self - shielding can strongly affect the evolution of a collapsing primordial halo which is being illuminated with photodissociating flux by a neighboring star , though the situation is somewhat idealized . additionally , we do not consider the more complicated effects relating to population iii stars which form in halos in the cosmic neighborhoods where previous generations of stars have existed . this allows us to ignore complex radiative , chemical and dynamical effects that would vastly complicate our calculations ( oshea et al . 2005a ; johnson , greif , & bromm 2006 ; yoshida et al . 2006a ; greif et al . 2007 ; abel , wise , & bryan 2007 ; ahn & shapiro 2007 ) . a further effect that is ignored in this paper is @xmath29 photodetachment . this could in principle be a significant effect @xmath29 is the catalyst for molecular hydrogen formation in the dominant 2 formation channel at densities @xmath147 @xmath4 , and it can be detached by photons with energies @xmath246 ev . photons with this energy would be produced in great numbers by the same massive population iii stars that we assume are producing the molecular hydrogen photodissociating background . however , as shown by ( 2001 ) , the rate of photodetachment is orders of magnitude smaller than the rate of @xmath29 formation at densities comparable to that found in the centers of the halos examined in this work , and thus the process of @xmath29 photodetachment can be safely ignored . in this paper , we examine the effects of molecular hydrogen dissociating backgrounds which range in strength from j@xmath247 to @xmath9 ergs@xmath10 @xmath11 hz@xmath10 sr@xmath10 in the lw band ( @xmath248 ev ) . this range is in good agreement with the expected range of photodissociating backgrounds predicted by & abel ( 2005 ) , but it is still finite . examination of our simulations show that the case with the lowest uv background ( j@xmath140 ) is almost identical to the `` control '' ( j@xmath68 ) calculation , justifying our choice of minimum value . our upper value is consistent with wise & abel , and examination of figures [ fig.halovals1 ] and [ fig.radprof_zcoll.1][fig.radprof_zcoll.3 ] suggests that increases in the strength of the uv background ( within reasonable values ) will result in a further delay in halo collapse , but no major change in the mode of star formation observed . this is an effect of the halo properties a small amount of molecular hydrogen will always exist in these halos , allowing the gas at the center to cool and contract quasi - statically to higher densities . once the gas has collapsed to very high densities , rapid h@xmath13 formation via the 3-body process will occur , essentially independent of the strength of the soft uv background , and the gas will be able to cool down to @xmath249 k very quickly . the effects of magnetic fields are completely ignored in the simulations discussed in this work . magnetic fields are discussed in detail in paper i , but , to summarize , a fairly high seed magnetic field is needed to be dynamically significant at the relatively low densities we explore in this work . the possible importance of magnetic fields has been explored in analytic and semi - analytic work ( tan & mckee 2004 ; silk & langer 2006 ; maki & susa 2007 ) . we will examine the possible evolution of magnetic fields within the context of cosmological amr simulations in a later paper ( oshea & turk 2007 , in preparation ) . the simulations presented in this paper are generated assuming a cosmology that is somewhat different than the currently - favored wmap year iii `` best - fit '' model ( spergel et al . most importantly , our value of @xmath250 is 0.9 , which is significantly higher than the wmap value of 0.761 . the general effect of a higher @xmath250 is to cause structure formation to take place earlier , and thus at a given redshift one would expect significantly more halos in our chosen cosmological model than in the wmap year iii model . however , the evolution of any single cosmological halo , such as the one examined in this work , is not particularly affected by this parameter in the sense that we are not examining halo stastical properties . in addition to @xmath250 , the ratio of @xmath251 in our simulations is 0.1337 , while it is @xmath252 in the wmap year iii cosmology . this may result in some small quantitative differences in , e.g. , the redshift of halo collapse , but should not significantly affect our results . we direct the reader to paper i for a detailed discussion of other possible numerical issues , such as the generation of cosmological initial conditions , the assumption that the cold dark matter model is correct , the choice of halo in our simulations , and the size of the simulation volumes used . this paper explores the formation of population iii stars in simulations with a constant soft uv background . our results agree well qualitatively with that of ( 2001 ) ; we both find that a soft uv background can delay the formation of molecular hydogen , and thus the cooling and collapse , of small ( @xmath253 m@xmath15 ) cosmological halos in which population iii stars form . we also find that increasing the soft uv background increases the minimum halo mass required for a halo to collapse ( in a way similar to that of smoothing the dark matter power spectrum at small scales see & norman ( 2006 ) for a discussion ) . machacek et al . derived a mass threshold for collapse as a function of the lw background flux that agrees well with our simulations , though the halo masses in our calculation are significantly higher . this is due to the halo that we examine being a `` typical '' halo rather than at the threshold mass for star formation . presumably , if we performed these calculations using many halos in a range of cosmological realizations , we would find a minimum halo mass that is somewhat lower than the masses seen in our calculations . our work is a significant improvement upon that of machacek et al . in some respects , as our simulations are much more highly resolved and we examine the evolution of a single halo over a much wider range of soft uv background fluxes . one drawback of our work compared to machacek et al . is that we examine the evolution of a single halo , albeit with a broad range of uv backgrounds . our work is similar to the calculations in ( 2003 ) which examine population iii star formation in the presence of a photodissociating ultraviolet background . they find that for values of j@xmath52 above @xmath254 erg s@xmath10 @xmath11 hz@xmath10 sr@xmath10 , hydrogen molecules are rapidly dissociated and gas cooling is inefficient , implying that the collapse of gas in the halo center may be delayed until atomic line cooling dominates , in halos with t@xmath12 k. while we see delays in halo collapse , we do see that a tiny amount of 2 can form even at high fuv background strengths , eventually allowing gas to cool and collapse to high densities without ever reaching temperatures at which atomic line cooling would be effective ( t @xmath255 k ) . yoshida et al . make this statement based on a set of simulations using two different values of j@xmath52 ( @xmath254 and @xmath256 ) , which bracket the `` break '' in properties seen in our results . the simulations used to obtain this result had sph particles with m@xmath257 h@xmath10 m@xmath15 and thus an effective mass resolution comparable to the mass of gas within the quasistatically - collapsing central region of a halo . our mass resolution is more than two orders of magnitude higher in the center of the cosmological halos that we examine . the differences between our result and theirs is likely due to the significant differences in resolution and may in fact be consistent once resolution is taken into account . we see a strong relationship between accretion rates onto the protostellar cloud and the strength of the photodissociating background . calculations with higher ultraviolet background strengths typically have a larger spherically - averaged baryon accretion rate onto the evolving protostellar cloud . this is clearly due to variation in halo central temperature relating to the amount of molecular hydrogen existing in the center of the halo at the epoch of collapse . accretion onto the evolving protostellar cloud is subsonic , and thus regulated by the local sound speed ( which scales as t@xmath258 ) . this implies some relationship between the strength of the photodissociating background and the final stellar mass of the primordial star however , the details of this relationship are unclear , and depends on many factors . for example , & palla ( 2003 ) suggest that an increase in accretion rate above @xmath153 m@xmath15/yr will actually result in a _ decrease _ in the final mass of the star due to radiative feedback from the evolving protostar . however , their results use one - dimenstional , fairly idealized models , and geometrical effects may be important . this is explored in & mckee ( 2004 ) , who use a combination of analytic and semi - analytic models of the evolving system . they suggest that accretion onto the protostar is highly non - spherical , and is in fact mediated by an accretion disk . they argue that a larger accretion rate onto the disk will lead to a larger star , though with some limitations . finally , ( 2001 ) and & yoshii ( 2003 ) study the imf of stars that form in t@xmath12 k metal - free protogalaxies in the presence of an h@xmath13 photodissociating background . they conclude that photodissociation actually decreases the jeans mass of the gas at high densities , and thus reduces the fragmentation mass scale of the clouds and presumably the stellar mass . they use one - dimensional , spherically symmetric simulations , however . we can explore this issue in more detail in later calculations , when appropriate models for shielding , cooling via @xmath29 , and more advanced chemistry have been implemented into enzo . this will be examined in a later paper . it is worth noting that the range of accretion rates observed in this situation are within the range of rates seen in the @xmath17cdm simulations discussed in paper i. this implies that the mass ranges of the resulting stars will not be significantly different than in the `` standard '' population iii star formation scenario . we see no fragmentation of the high - density baryon core , up to a baryon number density of @xmath259 @xmath4 , for the entire range of simulations explored in this paper . this is due to a combination of effects , but predominantly the poor cooling properties of molecular hydrogen . the gas is relatively hot ( @xmath260 kelvin ) and thus has a high sound speed , which helps to damp out perturbations in the halo center which would otherwise result in multiple fragments . this effect is exacerbated in simulations with high ultraviolet background strengths , as the temperatures ( and thus the sound speeds ) are generally higher . this result implies that there is no fundamental change in the mode of population iii star formation as halos grow , and that more massive `` proto - galactic '' halos , with t@xmath261 k , will continue to form a single massive star per halo . these halos will have a much larger binding energy than the smaller , m @xmath14 m@xmath15 halos which have traditionally been examined by numerical simulations , and implies that multiple generations of star formation may be able to take place in a single halo . this leads to the possibility of `` self - enrichment , '' where a single population iii star enriches the high - density center of the halo to metallicities high enough to change the cooling properties of the gas . this could cause a strong change in the imf ( santoro & shull 2006 ; smith & sigurdsson 2007 ) , and these objects could make a significant contribution to the reionization history of the universe ( mackey , bromm , & hernquist 2003 ; greif & bromm 2006 ) . we will examine whether the high - density gas in the centers of these more massive halos fragments in a later work . the values of accretion rates onto the evolving protostellar cloud which are observed with increasing photodissociating background flux ( which are always comparable to those observed in paper i ) , in addition to the apparent lack of fragmentation of gas in the halo center up to densities of n@xmath262 @xmath4 , implies that there is no major change in the mass range of population iii stars as halo masses increase to t@xmath5 k. this is in mild disagreement with previous semianalytic results by & haiman ( 2002 ) and ( 2003 ) . this is apparently because previous authors assumed that 2 cooling in `` second generation '' ( t@xmath12 k ) objects is unimportant , while we observe that a small 2 fraction , which forms in equilibrium with the uv background , can cool gas effectively to temperatures of @xmath263 k. we do agree with these authors that the majority of primordial star formation will take place in objects with t@xmath5 k , the so - called `` second generation '' objects ( macintyre , santoro , & thomas 2006 ) our work appears to contradict the results of & bromm ( 2006 ) , who use analytic and semianalytic techniques to follow the collapse of gas within halos of t@xmath264 . they find that , in their model , gas cools to @xmath265 k via atomic line cooling , and then contracts nearly isothermally to high densities , allowing a molecular hydrogen fraction of f@xmath266 to build up independent of local density and temperature . the gas in the center of the halo then cools and allows the gas to fragment on scales of @xmath158 m@xmath15 . we do not see this mode of star formation , possibly because we never generate the significantly ionized halos with t@xmath267 k upon which their scenario depends . rather , we simulate halos that in the cases of j@xmath0 are built up to t@xmath5 k via mergers , and the gas is never ionized to a significant degree . one possible reason for the observed differences is that we ignore the formation of deuterium hydride and its effects on the cooling properties of primordial gas . it is possible that , in some contexts , the inclusion of hd may result in enhanced fragmentation . this will be examined in future studies . the scenario described by oh & haiman may still in fact be able to occur , and deserves further detailed numerical study to determine the fate of the collapsing gas and the implications of the ( presumably ) extremely high accretion rates onto the forming protostellar clouds . our results are similar to those shown by & abel ( 2007 ) , who perform similar simulations examining the collapse of gas in cosmological halos in the presence of a photodissociating background . they also find that , regardless of the strength of the uv background , the collapse of gas in the centers of the cosmological halos in question still occurs via h@xmath13 cooling . this holds even for quite extreme examples , such as when the original electron fraction is set to unphysically low levels ( which should suppress h@xmath13 formation , at least temporarily ) . in this paper we have performed a suite of high dynamical range ( l@xmath268 ) 3d adaptive mesh cosmological simulations of the formation of population iii stars in a @xmath17cdm universe in the presence of a molecular hydrogen photodissocating ( `` lyman - werner '' ) ultraviolet background . the purpose of these calculations is to understand the effect that the soft ultraviolet background has on the evolution of the gas in collapsing cosmological halos and to determine possible effects on the forming protostellar cloud . these simulations are all of a single cosmological realization , but with varied ultraviolet background strengths . our principal results are as follows : \1 . our calculations show that , as the flux of ultraviolet radiation in the lyman - werner band is increased , population iii star formation in a given cosmological halo is delayed to later times and , as a result , an increase in the virial mass of this halo at the onset of baryon collapse . this is in good agreement with previous work by ( 2001 ) and ( 2003 ) . we find that , contrary to previous work , the formation of primordial stars is never completely suppressed , regardless of the strength of the uv background . a small amount of molecular hydrogen always exists in cosmological halos , and allows cooling and halo collapse in gas which is bathed in a strong photodissociating background but has not reached @xmath86 k. the previously - suggested mode of star formation in `` second generation '' halos , where the collapse of gas to high density is completely suppressed until cooling can take place via atomic hydrogen line transitions , is never observed in our calculations , which have photodissociating background strengths up to j@xmath1 . \3 . though the molecular hydrogen fraction in the centers of halos which are bathed in strong ( j@xmath0 ) lyman - werner radiation is very small at early times ( f@xmath269 ) , the gas at the center of the halo can still collapse due to the efficient cooling of molecular hydrogen at @xmath270 k , and to the extended time these halos require to collapse compared to halos in the presence of much smaller uv backgrounds . we observe that the estimated accretion rate onto the forming protostellar cloud varies strongly as a function of j@xmath52 , with simulations that have a stronger ultraviolet background having higher accretion rates . this is a function of the suppression of molecular hydrogen formation ( and thus suppression of effective cooling ) by the photodissociating background and of the higher virial temperatures of these halos when the gas finally collapses . only a single clump is formed at the center of each collapsing cosmological halo , regardless of the strength of the photodissociating background , up to a baryon number density of @xmath3 @xmath4 . this implies that , as in the more commonly - studied mode of star formation , we will find only a single star per halo even in objects which are massive enough that t@xmath12 k. Abstract:

Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.

Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered . Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video . Paper: i would like to revive , from a new viewpoint , a somewhat old fashioned discussion , which recently seems to be all but extinct . as goes without saying , every contribution , correction , criticism or suggestion is greatly appreciated . the discussion , which lasted for the major part of the early stages of atomic , nuclear and particle physics , as we know them today , dealt primarily with the scientific and logical implications of quantum theory . again revived by david bohm s contribution , the `` hidden variables '' , it gradually began to loose on impact , until today any fundamental question in this respect seems to be considered a lack of scientific soundness . from an epistemological point of view , the fact is not easily understood , since all the fundamental problems are still far from any solution . second quantization , on the contrary , provides an even more problematic conception by its inherent infinity problems @xcite , which , till now , have not been solved in a satisfying way . that all the original problems are still there , can be seen by a survey of late publications of bohm @xcite , de broglie @xcite , dirac @xcite , or schrdinger @xcite . from the viewpoint of common sense the most profound reason of uneasiness with quantum theory , despite its indisputable successes , has been expressed by richard feynman : _ you see , my physics students do nt understand it either . that is , because i do nt understand it . nobody does . _ @xcite that the discussion , mentioned above , is nevertheless non existent , might have its origins therefore not so much in a satisfying status quo , but rather in a lack of alternative concepts . from an epistemological point of view a well working theory , despite all its conflicts with logical reasoning , is better than no theory . the discussion then leads to the question , why so far no promising concept has been put forth . comparing with other sciences , the situation seems very unusual : seventy years of continuous research from schrdinger s first publications @xcite have neither altered the principles of quantum theory , nor have they removed the axiomatic qualities of its fundamental statements . this situation basically leaves two possibilities : either to accept , that we can not understand , i.e. that we _ have to believe _ , or to search for alternatives . the attempts so far , to remove the axiomatic qualities of quantum theory , which can be summarized by the _ copenhagen interpretation _ @xcite , mainly focussed on the statistical qualities attributed to fundamental physical events . it was thought , that a suitable theoretical framework could prove quantum events to be integral results of basically continuous processes . the first of these attempts can be attributed to erwin schrdinger @xcite . his wave mechanics , now a fundamental part of quantum theory , does not allow for an interpretation of wave functions as _ physical _ waves due to the contradiction a spreading wave packet presents to mass conservation . on a fundamental level , the contradiction originates in the difference between phase velocity and group velocity of de broglie waves @xcite . since schrdinger s equation is based on exactly these qualities of de broglie waves , it can not be retained without rejecting the interpretation of wave functions as physical waves . the problem was solved by born s interpretation @xcite of @xmath4 as a _ probability amplitude _ , an interpretation which constitutes an integral part of the copenhagen interpretation . this interpretation of the wave function is not without its inherent problems , as einstein , podolksky and rosen pointed out @xcite . if quantum theory contained all the physical information about a spin system , thus their line of reasoning , then information about a measurement process must be exchanged with a velocity faster than c , if spin conservation is to be retained . this leaves , as they point out , only two alternatives : either quantum theory contradicts the theory of relativity , or it does not contain all the information about the system : in this case , quantum theory is incomplete . the scientific controversy was subject to much discussion , but never conclusively solved . recently , its implications have been extended by the phenomenon of interaction free measurements @xcite , based on a thought experiment by renninger @xcite and realized by a mach zehnder interferometer . interaction free measurements have different implications in a classical or quantum context : while a measurement without interaction in classical physics does not alter the system , it leads to a reduction of the wave function in quantum theory . according to the solution , proposed by heisenberg ( see ref.@xcite ) only the reduction of the wave function constitutes physical reality : in this case the question is legitimate , why a wave function , obviously devoid of any physical meaning , plays such an important role in current theories . david bohm s famous theory of hidden variables @xcite was a far more elaborate concept along the same lines . he tried to prove , that the formalism of quantum theory allows for a sub layer of hidden variables , and that the framework therefore is , as einstein suspected , incomplete . the modification was rejected due to the work of bell , who devised a simple situation , where this assumption could be put to a test @xcite . the bell inequalities proved that , within the framework of quantum theory , such an assumption leads to logical contradictions . the theory of hidden variables was therefore rejected . the combined evidence of all these attempts allows the conclusion , that a modification of quantum theory within its fundamental axioms , yielding a framework of which the quantum aspect will be but a result , is not very promising . at best , it reproduces numerical results by a different mathematical structure , at worst , it not even accounts for basic experiments . there remain , therefore , three fundamental questions to be answered prior to any attempted modification of micro physics : * on what theoretical or experimental basis could an alternative formulation be based ? * which theoretical concept of physics , statistical , field theory , or mechanics , shall be employed ? * what constitutes a successful alternative to current formulations ? experimental evidence exists , that moving electrons exhibit wave like features . these qualities have been established beyond doubt by diffraction experiments of davisson and germer @xcite . quantum theory can not directly access wave like qualities , because , as already mentioned , the periodic wave function needs to be subjected to a complicated evaluation process in order to extract its physical relevance . if the initial problems of wave dispersion and velocity can be overcome , the experimental result of wave characteristics of moving mass and its mathematical formalization may well constitute the foundation of a different theoretical conception . the only other experimental evidence at hand with equivalent significance , the quantum phenomena , do not as easily fit into a physical interpretation , since the basic obstacle , why discrete values should be the only ones measured , has to be removed : quantum phenomena are therefore more remote in terms of basic concepts . concerning the theoretical context , it has to be considered , that quantum theory originally started as a modification of mechanics . most of the concepts of the theory are consequently still disguised mechanical concepts . field theoretical results are therefore only achieved by a statistical superstructure : the mechanical basis then leads to a statistical formulation of field theories , which allows for particle interactions , but not for internal particle structures . modifications of this methodology basically occur along two lines : either by a modification of interactions , which requires additional qualities of particles , or by postulating the existence of sub particles . physical progress then requires an ever refined toolkit of particles , sub particles and interactions . from the viewpoint of epistemology , the problem inherent to this approach is the limited degree of freedom . every modification requires a major change of particle properties , and since every new experiment provides data not yet accounted for , the development of physics becomes an ever increasing inventory of individual particles . the particle zoo , high energy physicists so frequently refer to , can , along these epistemological lines , be seen as a consequence of theoretical shortcomings . since the experimental basis the wave characteristics and thus the internal structure of particles suggest an approach based on field theory rather than mechanics , this essay will be based on field theory . if mechanical concepts are required , they always refer to continuous distributions of physical qualities , which yield discrete mass or charge values only by integration . if one is to try an alternative route of theoretical development , it seems important , not to get carried away and extend a concept beyond its limits of proper application . to this end , a goal has to be defined as well as careful checks of experimental evidence . a theory , which does not allow for falsification , remains useless , the same applies to a new theory , which does not deviate from the current one by at least one significant result . that a new theory can not and should not reproduce all results of an existing one , goes without saying personally , i think that the following results are sufficient to justify serious consideration of a new approach : * the reproduction of fundamental results of early quantum theory * the formalization of internal particle structures and the proof of physical significance of these structures * a model of ( hydrogen ) atoms consistent with the formalism developed and consistent with experimental evidence * the basics of a theory of particle interaction due to intrinsic characteristics * provision of at least one significant deviation which allows for an experimentum crucis the fundamental relations and concepts of this new approach have already been published or are in print in the _ speculations in science and technology _ ( chapman and hall , london ) @xcite . the accounts given in this and follow up papers are somewhat enhanced and thorougher versions , making use of the greater freedom of length . as already emphasized , any feedback is greatly appreciated and readers are welcomed to contact me directly via email at the email address : [email protected] to allow for internal characteristics of moving particles we base the following section on the experimental evidence of wave features . theoretically , the framework will be based on a suitable adaptation of the fundamental relations found by l. de broglie . originally , de broglie s formalization of waves @xcite was based on the framework of special relativity , the amplitude of a de broglie wave given by : @xmath5 the variables are four dimensional vectors , their components are described by the following relations : @xmath6 in a three dimensional and non relativistic ( @xmath7 = 1 ) adaptation of the original equation ( [ ws001 ] ) the amplitude can be expressed as a plane wave . this adaptation is quite common in quantum theory and therefore no deviation from the original framework : @xmath8 the first major deviation from the traditional framework is the interpretation of @xmath9 as a real function , as a physical wave . this conception is not compatible with quantum theory for the following reasons : as a moving particle can not consist of a specific plane wave ( particle mass in this case would be distributed over an infinite region of space ) , a moving particle in quantum theory _ must _ be formalized as a fourier integral over partial waves . an application of schrdinger s equation then leads to the , above mentioned , spreading of the wave packet , which contradicts experimental evidence . the interpretation of the wave function as a _ physical entity _ , furthermore , contradicts heisenberg s uncertainty relation @xcite , because it implies the possibility of measurements below quantum level . @xmath10 the reason , that this real formalization of de broglie remained so far unconsidered , is not only its inconsistency with quantum theory , but also a consequence of planck s relation : dispersion of de broglie waves is described by two independent relations , which are widely confirmed in experiments . the first is the wavelength of de broglie waves , established by diffraction experiments of davisson and germer @xcite , the second planck s energy relation @xcite : @xmath11 if particle energy is classical _ kinetic _ or relativistic energy , the phase velocity of a de broglie wave is not equivalent to particle velocity : @xmath12 the deduction of phase velocity , leading to the contradiction in eq . ( [ ws006 ] ) is , contrary to a first impression , not self evident . it contains , on thorougher analysis , a conjecture and a subsequent logical circle . firstly , it is not self evident , that on a micro level energy of a particle is restricted to _ kinetic _ energy of inertial mass : assuming , that a particle is , basically , a mechanical entity without any internal energy component , can not be inferred from experimental or theoretical results . it is therefore an _ assumption _ lacking a solid basis . based on this conjecture is the following logical circle : _ if energy is kinetic energy , phase velocity of a de broglie wave is not equal to mechanical velocity of a particle . if phase velocity does not equal mechanical velocity , a free particle can not consist of a single wave of specific frequency . if it does not consist of a single wave , then the wave features of a particle must be formalized as a fourier integral over infinitely many partial waves . in this case any partial wave can not be interpreted as a physical wave . if the interpretation as a physical wave is not justified , then internal wave features can not be related to physical qualities . if they can not be related to physical qualities , then internal processes must remain unconsidered . and if internal processes remain unconsidered , then energy of the particle is kinetic energy _ apart from the question , whether this assumption is necessary , which can only be answered a posteriori , it seems also legitimate to ask , whether it is the best possible assumption , especially in view of complications arising from fundamental particles formalized as fourier integrals over infinitely many partial waves . from the viewpoint of simplicity , the concept is necessary , if no alternative exists , it is unnecessary complicated , if the same theoretical result the wave features of single particles can be obtained by a simpler formalism . to this aim alternatives have to be analyzed . a direct way of formalization would be based on two basic statements : ( 1 ) the experimental evidence of wave features , and ( 2 ) the assumption , that wave features must be reflected by _ physical _ qualities of particles , density for example . mathematically , these statements are expressed by : @xmath13 @xmath14 in view of the dispersion relations eq . [ ws005 ] these relations seem contradictory : the standard evaluation procedure would , for a specific _ physical _ wave , lead to a difference between phase velocity and mechanical velocity in conflict with the energy principle . this contradiction depends , though , on the principal conjecture , that a moving particle is equivalent to inertial mass , and that all its energy is contained in the longitudinal motion of an inertial mass @xmath15 with velocity @xmath16 . as soon as wave features are assumed to describe the physical nature of particle motion , this conjecture can no longer be sustained : energy of the particle will then be contained in its _ mass oscillations_. since mass oscillations determine a periodic change of kinetic energy , the energy principle requires the existence of an _ intrinsic _ potential of particle motion , and averaging over kinetic and potential energy during particle motion then leads to a total energy of double the original kinetic value . using this total energy for planck s relation satisfies the dispersion relation of a monochromatic plane wave : based on the intrinsic properties of physical waves any monochromatic plane particle wave then satisfies the wave equation . averaging density of the particle wave over a full period we get initially : @xmath17 and the kinetic energy of particle motion is therefore ( @xmath18 denotes the volume of the particle ) : @xmath19 since kinetic energy is not constant but periodic , the result requires that an intrinsic potential exists , which yields an equivalent average of potential energy : @xmath20 and total energy of the particle wave is then : @xmath21 phase velocity of this particle wave equals , consistent with quantum theory , mechanical velocity of particle motion , although , contrary to quantum theory , no fourier integral over partial waves is required . therefore any monochromatic plane particle wave , consisting of oscillating mass and a complementary potential , describes motion of a _ free particle _ : @xmath22 from a theoretical point of view the existence of intrinsic potentials is a _ conjecture _ , it is more problematic than the original one based on inertial mass , since it implies the existence of physical variables not accounted for in the current framework of quantum theory . relating @xmath23 to total energy of the particle is , in this respect , not problematic , since experimentally energy of a particle can only be estimated by its state of motion or wavelength : and the relation between particle velocity @xmath24 , wavelength @xmath25 , and frequency @xmath26 is retained . with the dispersion relation given by eq . [ ws013 ] the wave function @xmath27 and density @xmath28 of free particles comply with a wave equation : @xmath29 the wave equations display intrinsic features of particle motion and possess , as will be seen in the following sections , the same dimensional level as electrodynamic formulations . the logical structure of physical statements is therefore modified : while in the standard procedure of quantum field theory the fundamental statements of quantum theory determine events on a micro level , and electromagnetic fields are logical superstructures , in the present context statements about the wave features of particles are different aspects of the same physical phenomena dealt within electrodynamics . this parallel development of electrodynamics and quantum theory from the same root the intrinsic wave features of particles must be understood in a literal sense , because the potentials deduced from mass oscillations will be related to electromagnetic fields . the schrdinger equation , in this context , is an expression of mechanical features i.e. potential and kinetic energy of particle motion . from the viewpoint of physical waves it is not without a certain degree of arbitrariness . to derive the relation we proceed from the periodic wave function eq . [ ws013 ] . then the time differential is given by : @xmath30 kinetic energy @xmath31 of particle motion will therefore be : @xmath32 and substituting eq . [ ws015 ] into [ ws016 ] we get for the kinetic energy of the particle : @xmath33 if the total energy of a particle is equal to kinetic energy and a potential @xmath34 : @xmath35 then the wave equation in the presence of an external potential is described by : @xmath36 the relation is equivalent to a time free schrdinger equation @xcite . it is important to consider , that this ( mechanical ) formulation of the wave equation explicitly relates physical potentials to kinetic energy and thus the wave length of a material wave ( as a result of the laplace operator acting on @xmath0 ) and that , therefore , in a region , where @xmath34 takes successively different values , every kinetic energy and thus wave length is generally possible . its interpretation in the context of material waves is not trivial , though . if the volume of a particle is finite , then wavelength and frequency become _ intrinsic _ variables of motion , which implies , due to energy conservation , that the wave function itself is a measure for the potential at an arbitrary point @xmath37 . if it is a measure for the physical conditions of the environment i.e. the intensity of @xmath34 , then it _ must _ have physical relevance . but if it has physical relevance , then the epr dilemma @xcite will be fully confirmed , and the result will favor einsteins s interpretation of quantum theory : quantum theory can not be complete under the condition that ( 1 ) particles do have finite dimensions , and ( 2 ) the schrdinger equation is a correct description of the variations of particle waves in the presence of external fields . the only alternative , which leaves quantum theory intact , is the assumption of particles with zero volume : an assumption which leads , in the context of electrodynamics , to the equally awkward result of infinite energy of particles . the first major result of this essay can therefore be formulated as follows : * the interpretation of particles as physical waves allows the conclusion , that quantum theory can not be , in a logical sense , a complete theoretical description of micro physical systems . there exists another problem usually hidden in the mathematical formalism of quantum theory . let an external potential be given by @xmath34 . transforming eq . [ ws019 ] into a moving coordinate system @xmath38 described by : @xmath39 we get the following equation : @xmath40 since the variable @xmath41 in this case is undefined , the relation contains an element of arbitrariness . it is not conceivable , from this deduction , how a time free schrdinger equation could be derived : if the time dependent part of @xmath0 is eliminated , the procedure is equivalent to a transformation into a moving coordinate system , but in this case the potential becomes a function of time . and if the wave equation is integrated in the system at rest , then the wave functions depend on time . from a physical point of view , the reduction of the schrdinger equation to its time free form actually eliminates all the time dependent interaction and adjustment processes bound to occur for _ every _ particle wave interacting with a changed environment . it may well be , that this disregard of development accounts for the commonly rather static concepts in quantum theory . within the framework of material waves , the arbitrariness of the schrdinger equation can be referred to the intrinsic potential of mass oscillations , not accounted for in quantum theory . and its consequence , as can equally be derived , is an uncertainty about the exact value of @xmath42 of the wave function @xmath43 . the uncertainty of @xmath42 together with the period of intrinsic potentials @xmath44 is then sufficient to derive heisenberg s uncertainty relations @xcite . to this aim we proceed from the schrdinger equation in the moving frame of reference eq . [ ws020 ] . setting the upper and lower limits of the potential @xmath45 to : @xmath46 and calculating the correlating @xmath47vectors of the wave function @xmath48 : @xmath49 we get the following relation : @xmath50 evaluating the relation in a one dimensional model and accounting for the yet unknown variation of the potential @xmath51 by : @xmath52 the uncertainty @xmath53 due to the undefined variable t will be : @xmath54 if the uncertainty originates from the neglected intrinsic potential @xmath55 ( see eq . [ ws011 ] ) , the uncertainty of the applied potentials is described by : @xmath56 and therefore the uncertainty of @xmath47 can be referred to the value of @xmath47 : @xmath57 the uncertainty does not result from wave features of particles , as heisenberg s initial interpretation suggested @xcite , nor is it an expression of a fundamental physical principle , as the copenhagen interpretation would have it @xcite . it is , on the contrary , an expression of the _ minimum error _ , inherent to _ any _ evaluation of the schrdinger equation , resulting from the fundamental assumption in quantum theory , i.e. the interpretation of particles as inertial mass aggregations . since the distance between two potential maxima is given by ( the value can deviate in two directions which yields total uncertainty of the @xmath58coordinate ) : @xmath59 the uncertainty may equally be written as : @xmath60 heisenberg actually derived @xcite the uncertainty relations @xmath61 . the fourier transform inherent to quantum theory suggests a correction of the constant eq . [ ws027 ] by a factor @xmath62 . in this case the deduction yields _ exactly _ the same result as the canonical formulation of quantum theory @xcite : @xmath63 the minimum error due to intrinsic potentials is therefore equal to the uncertainty of quantum theory , and the logical relation between schrdinger s equation and the uncertainty relations is therefore a relation of reason and consequence : _ because _ schrdinger s relation is not precise by the value of intrinsic potentials , the uncertainty relations _ must be _ generally valid . this is the second major result of the present essay : * _ because _ quantum theory neglects intrinsic characteristics of particle motion , the schrdinger equation is generally not precise by a value described by heisenberg s uncertainty relations . the result equally seems to settle the long standing controversy between the _ empirical _ and the _ axiomatic _ interpretation of this important relation : it is not empirical , since it does not depend on any measurement process ; but it is equally not a physical principle , because it is due to the fundamental assumptions of quantum theory . the solution to the problem of interpretation is therefore a somewhat wider frame of reference : although within the principles of quantum theory the relation is an _ axiom _ , it is nonetheless a _ result _ of fundamental theoretical shortcomings and not a physical principle . in the preceding section we could demonstrate , that quantum theory must not necessarily be a comprehensive representation of physical reality . it was shown , on the contrary , that the principal assumption of quantum theory , the assumption of inertial mass of particles , is a posteriori neither justified by the wave features of particles nor by the fundamental planck and de broglie relations . it is but _ one _ possible theoretical framework and , given the logical problems of a precise relation between measurements and reality arising from this concept , not even the best possible framework . on an analytical level the establishment of fundamental relations of quantum theory within a different framework and their significance that the uncertainty relations can also , and consistently , be interpreted as an expression of theoretical shortcomings due to a disregard of intrinsic properties served to establish the limitations of the current theoretical standard . they also served to define the logical _ location _ of quantum theory and to determine the regions of interest , where research is commendable if a theory _ outside _ the current framework is taken into consideration . from the viewpoint of theoretical synthesis we showed that the intrinsic properties of particles and their relations are a consequence of the experimental evidence of wave features of particles . the de broglie relations , in a non relativistic formulation , provided the essential laws by which these intrinsic variables are described . they allowed to establish ( 1 ) periodic mass oscillations within the particle , and ( 2 ) the existence of a periodic potential . these results were sufficient to deduce the fundamental relations of quantum theory _ and _ , at the same time , to show their inherent limitations . apart from showing the significance of the periodic potentials which will be done in the following sections the first two requirements mentioned in the introduction are therefore fulfilled . fundamental results of early quantum theory are reproduced ( schrdinger s relation as well as the uncertainty relations , while single experiments will be treated in the following sections ) , and the intrinsic wave features of particles were shown to be of _ physical _ significance , which strongly supports einstein s view in the epr paradox . classical electrodynamics is considered one of the most refined and powerful physical theories at hand . it served , during the last hundred years , ever again as a model for physical formalization , and its implications led to quite a few extensions of physical knowledge , not least albert einstein s theory of special relativity @xcite . a great deal of the fascination of classical electrodynamics results from its mathematical conciseness and brevity . the possibility to describe and account for most of the phenomena concerning interactions of charge by a set of basically four linear differential equations , the _ maxwell equations _ @xcite , must either seem a lucky coincidence or an expression of a deeply rooted analogy in physical reality . that classical electrodynamics can not be referred to mechanical conceptions , has been proved during the scientific controversy about the existence of the _ aether _ . this proposed medium of electromagnetic fields was never detected , its existence , furthermore , would contradict the experimental results of michelson and morley @xcite . from the theoretical side , the controversy was settled by einstein s theory of relativity . since the correctness of maxwell s equations is established beyond doubt , it remains an epistemological problem , why no attempt to refer them to fundamental physical axioms has succeeded so far @xcite . summarizing the current situation in two statements : ( 1 ) maxwell s equations are correct , and ( 2 ) they can not be referred to mechanical axioms , there exist equally two logical conclusions to the epistemological problem : ( 1 ) maxwell s equations are themselves of an axiomatic nature , and ( 2 ) the axioms , on which they are based , have not yet been detected . currently , the established opinion is ( 1 ) . basically , one could leave it at this state and employ the relations as correct algorithms . from the viewpoint of macro physics , the procedure is justified by the wealth of experimental verifications at hand . the same does not apply , though , to an application of electrodynamics in micro physical models . since the exact origin of the relations is obscure , it can not be guaranteed , that they do not , in some way , preclude characteristics of physical systems , which contradict other assumptions . obviously , there exist only two ways out of this logical dilemma : either it can be proved , that quantum theory is logically independent of electrodynamics a proof , which never has been given , or it can be established that electrodynamics itself is based on micro physical axioms : in this case the current procedure in qed @xcite is logically insufficient . the logical conclusion to our epistemological problem would then be : ( 2 ) the maxwell relations are an expression of intrinsic characteristics of particles . based on the intrinsic wave characteristics of free particles , developed in the previous section , the verification of ( 2 ) does not present an impossible problem . the maxwell equations , in material wave theory , are an expression of longitudinal variations of intrinsic variables of particles in motion . from the wave equation for longitudinal momentum @xmath64 : @xmath65 and the equation of continuity for momentum @xmath64 and density @xmath66 : @xmath67 it follows within a micro volume , where particle velocity @xmath24 is constant : @xmath68 the parameter @xmath69 is a dimensional constant employed to make mechanical units compatible with electromagnetic variables , its dimension is equal to density of charge . electric fields @xmath70 and magnetic fields @xmath71 are now defined in terms of momentum @xmath64 and the potential @xmath72 due to mass oscillations ( see the previous section ) : @xmath73 and substituting eq . [ ed003 ] into [ ed001 ] we get , with the help of [ ed004 ] and [ ed005 ] : @xmath74 and since the total intrinsic potential is a constant : @xmath75 the following relation holds in full generality within every micro volume : @xmath76 rotation of eq . [ ed004 ] yields , but for a constant , maxwell s first equation : @xmath77 to deduce the inhomogeneous equation we additionally have to employ the source equations of electrodynamic theory and the definition of @xmath78 fields : @xmath79 it is assumed that the material constants @xmath80 and @xmath81 also remain constant within the micro volume . substituting into eq . [ ed008 ] and computing the source of [ ed010 ] , the sum yields : @xmath82 and if the constant of integration is zero , the result will be maxwell s inhomogeneous equation : @xmath83 finally , by computing the time differentials of eqs . [ ed008 ] and [ ed009 ] , the wave equations for electromagnetic fields in a vacuum ( @xmath84 ) can be deduced : @xmath85 the results indicate , that electrodynamics and quantum theory do have a common root , the _ intrinsic _ properties of moving particles . from the viewpoint of material waves they are therefore different aspects of the same physical phenomenon , the wave features of mass , which is the third major result of this essay : * electrodynamics and wave mechanics are theoretical concepts based on the same physical phenomena , the intrinsic features of moving particles . logically speaking , the result means , that a method , which employs quantum theory to calculate physical variables by way of observables , and which identifies these observables measured variables as field variables in electrodynamics can not be correct . the energy principle of material waves can be identified as the classical lorentz standard by a combination of the continuity equation and the definition of electric fields including intrinsic potentials . since : @xmath86 the wave equation for linear motion @xmath87 leads to : @xmath88 and for uniform motion @xmath89 the potential can be related to momentum @xmath90 by : @xmath91 comparing with the expression in classical electrodynamics the vector potential @xmath92 , in classical electrodynamics an abstract conception , is proportional to momentum of particle motion : @xmath93 the wave features of photons , or the representation of electromagnetic fields by wave type field vectors , have long been the only aspect in consideration . the picture changed only after experimental research was directed towards the fundamental problems of interaction between matter and electromagnetic fields . due to planck s result on black body radiation and einstein s application of planck s formula to the problem of photo electricity @xcite , the energy of photons gained special attention , since it was ( 1 ) proportional to frequency and not , as field theory proposed , intensity , and ( 2 ) the energy quantum @xmath94 could no longer be distributed locally , because the energy changes in interactions required an exchange of a full number @xmath95 of energy quanta . in einstein s view the interaction suggested that energy of photons be distributed in single points within the electromagnetic fields of radiation . according to the copenhagen interpretation of quantum theory @xcite the two theoretical aspects wave features and energy quanta describe complementary facts of a complex physical reality not adaptable to any single theoretical framework . this interpretation , which focusses on the central notion of wave particle duality , states that all the qualities like polarization and interference , typical for a wave type theory , have to be treated by electrodynamics , while energy and interaction phenomena must be seen from the viewpoint of quantum theory . the logical justification for retaining the duality , which is in itself a logical contradiction if wave features and particle features were to prevail _ simultaneously _ , was seen by jordan @xcite and heisenberg @xcite in the impossibility of experiments i.e. physical processes where both aspects _ must _ simultaneously exist . this justification is not undisputed . renninger showed by a rather simple thought experiment @xcite , that an interference measurement involving two separate light paths does not allow for the probability interpretation of electromagnetic field vectors , since the result of the measurement can be altered in a deterministic manner by the insertion of optical devices into a single light path . the analysis of the experiment leads to the conclusion , that the wave features _ must have _ physical significance , which again seems to confirm the epr dilemma already quoted @xcite . based on this experiment renninger deduced the following statement about the features of photons ( translation by the author , emphasizing by renninger ) : _ every light quantum consists of an energy particle , which is guided by a wave without energy _ the important result , from our point of view , is the physical significance of wave features . the energy particle , which renninger refers to , is a direct result of einstein s interpretation of photo electricity , which equally determines the interpretation of the guiding wave as energy free . from the viewpoint of physical concepts , an energy free _ physical _ wave is not all too convincing . if a region of space is altered by a propagating wave , thus the obvious objection , then it can not be without a physical entity moving . but since all physical field variables are , in some way , related to energy , a physical entity propagating without any propagation of energy seems contradictory . on thorougher analysis the necessity to divide between two separate physical entities to account for energy as well as electromagnetic features of photons depends on the interpretation of the interaction process itself . since ( 1 ) the quantum of energy is fully transferred , and ( 2 ) the transfer interval is well below the level of measurements , the energy must be contained in an insignificantly small volume . the alternative being , as renninger pointed out , that the wave will be contracted with a velocity exceeding @xmath96 during every interaction process . it is this interpretation of the interaction process , which will be changed by material wave theory . to understand the decisive modification , we present here and without proof a result on the interactions of electrons and photons , which will be derived later on . assuming that the interaction interval equals , and setting @xmath97 for convenience equal to 1 , an intrinsic model of particles and fields will have to consider energy density at a specific point _ within _ the particle . if total energy density is constant and @xmath98 , then the time derivative of energy density equals : @xmath99 in this way the traditional features of photons are retained , while the meaning of the term _ energy quantum _ is modified : the energy quantum _ transferred _ in an interaction process equals @xmath100 , regardless of the actual volume of the photon , and equally regardless of the exact duration of the interaction process . as long as the total density of energy @xmath98 is constant , the relation holds for every single point of the underlying field and therefore for the whole region of the physical wave corresponding to a photon . now let us consider a case , where the initial photon is , by some optical device , split into two . if one of the partial volumes a half photon so to say then interacts with matter , the process is described by : @xmath101 the energy density transferred remains constant , but not total energy . the process therefore _ seems _ to be a confirmation of the principle , that all interactions occur in discrete energy quanta only , if discrete quantities of mass or charge are considered . only , in short , if the general outlook on processes is a mechanical one . it is no contradiction with einstein s calculation on photo electricity , to interpret it as an effect of _ energy densities _ and transfer rates . it only has to be considered , that the total volume affected by interactions will depend on the total volume of the fractional photon . from this result it can be concluded , that the term _ energy quantum _ is not appropriate for the physical process of interaction : since the total energy transferred depends on ( 1 ) the frequency of radiation , and ( 2 ) the volume of the photon , total energy transferred is the product of energy density proportional to frequency and volume which may be related to intensity . in an _ intrinsic _ formalism of interaction , furthermore , the total quantities transferred are only secondary , the more so , since electrodynamics already is a theory of intrinsic wave features , as deduced above . in material wave theory photons are distributions of mass and energy , and the guiding wave possesses the same dimensions as the energy distribution , while the guiding wave as well as mass movement contribute alike to total energy of the photon . to derive the essential features of photons we use the fundamental wave equation of intrinsic particle momentum . the exact dimensions as well as the problems of photon boundaries are shown to be of no effect for the results achieved . denoting an , initially , abstract momentum of a photon by @xmath102 , we proceed from the wave equation in a vacuum given by : @xmath103 with the identity for the laplace operator and the general relation between momentum @xmath102 and vector potential @xmath104 from eq . ( [ ed016 ] ) : @xmath105 the wave equation may be rewritten as : @xmath106 using the solution for the homogeneous maxwell relations ( the following deduction employs , for convenience , gaussian units ) : @xmath107 the wave equation yields the following result : @xmath108 we choose the specific solution by setting the term in brackets equal to zero and get therefore : @xmath109 the equation can be solved by any wave packet consisting of plain waves and complementary potentials given by : @xmath110 for a component @xmath111 of the wave packet the amplitudes must comply with : @xmath112 setting @xmath113 equal to @xmath114 and using the amplitudes of material waves as well as vacuum dispersion we recover einstein s energy relation @xcite : @xmath115 we define now a _ photon _ as any component of the wave packet . more specifically , we describe a photon by a plane material wave and its complementary electromagnetic potential . @xmath116 the _ energy density _ at a specific location of the photon is denoted by an electromagnetic potential and a potential due to the vector @xmath90 . if we identify @xmath90 as a longitudinal material wave , its energy density at any arbitrary point , the _ total potential _ , is double its value in classical mechanics . @xmath117 then the material aspect of a photon in motion is that of a material wave , while , due to additional electromagnetic characteristics , total energy density is constant and does not depend on location or time : @xmath118 the electromagnetic potential must correlate with electromagnetic field vectors . using electromagnetic potentials of a vacuum : @xmath119 and assuming for consistency with classical electrodynamics , that electromagnetic fields will be of transversal polarization , the transversal fields of a photon will be given by : @xmath120 @xmath121 transversal electromagnetic fields of a wave packet are therefore described by : @xmath122 the units of electromagnetic fields will be treated on a more fundamental basis in the following sections , presently they only signify a constant value of some suitable dimension . in the section on electrodynamics of his famous publication einstein @xcite referred the universal validity of maxwell s equations to their lorentz invariance . based on the theoretical framework of intrinsic features of variables , it is tempting to relate the lorentz invariance of maxwell s equations to the invariance of the wave equations under a lorentz transformation . if it can be established , that the lorentz transformation is also the transformation leaving intrinsic features of particles intact , then the kinematic section of the theory of relativity can also be seen as a necessary modification of mechanical concepts to account for electromagnetic phenomena . as the maxwell relations are not only valid for intrinsic features of photons but also electrons which derives from their independence of particle velocity u we proceed from the wave equation for the intrinsic momentum @xmath64 of a particle with arbitrary velocity @xmath123 in a moving frame of reference s with @xmath124 relative to a system s at rest . the wave equation in s then will be : @xmath125 with the standard lorentz transformation : @xmath126 the differentials in s are given by : @xmath127 density of mass and velocity in s are described by ( transformation of velocities according to the lorentz transformation , @xmath128 presently undefined ) : @xmath129 then the transformation of the wave equations yields two wave equations for momentum @xmath130 and density @xmath66 : @xmath131 energy measurements in the system s at rest must be measurements of the phase velocity @xmath132 of the particle waves . since , according to the transformation , the measurement in s yields : @xmath133 the total potential @xmath98 , measured in s will be : @xmath134 and if density @xmath135 transforms according to a relativistic mass effect with : @xmath136 then the total intrinsic potential measured in the system s will be higher than the potential measured in s : @xmath137 but the total intrinsic energy of a particle with volume @xmath18 will not be affected , since the x coordinate will be , again according to the lorentz transformation , contracted : @xmath138 the interpretation of this result exhibits some interesting features of the lorentz transformation applied to electrodynamic theory . it leaves the wave equations and their energy relations intact if , and only if energy _ quantities _ are evaluated , i.e. only in an integral evaluation of particle properties . in this case it seems therefore justified , to consider special relativity as a necessary adaptation of kinematic variables to the theory of electrodynamics . the same does not hold , though , for the intrinsic potentials of particle motion . any transformation into a moving reference frame in this case leads to an increase of the total potential @xmath98 , in the case of photons ( @xmath139 ) the intrinsic potential then will be infinite . the essential result of this analysis of special relativity may be expressed by : * the wave equations of intrinsic particle structures are lorentz invariant only for an integral evaluation of energy . the total intrinsic potentials increase for every transformation into a moving frame of reference . that maxwell s relations can be referred to intrinsic characteristics of free particles , proves two assumptions : ( 1 ) the relations are themselves not of an axiomatic nature , contrary to current opinions they can be referred to a sublayer of still more fundamental axioms . ( 2 ) quantum theory and electrodynamics are not logically independent , since both concepts are a formalization of wave features of particles . the features of photons in material wave theory equally seem to fit into the framework of classical electrodynamics : electromagnetic field vectors are transversal , while the longitudinal component is purely kinetic . both aspects together provide a model of photons , which is simultaneously an extension of electrodynamics ( since the variables of motion exist in addition to the electromagnetic field vectors ) , and an extension of quantum theory ( since the electromagnetic fields are not originally included in the kinetic model of quantum theory ) . relativistic electrodynamics only provides lorentz invariant formulations of intrinsic particle features , if energy quantities are evaluated . since the intrinsic potentials depend on the reference frame of evaluation and increase by a transformation into a moving coordinate system , the theory suggests that the infinity problems , inherent to relativistic quantum fields , may be related to the logical structure of qed . while the definition of magnetic fields eq . [ ed005 ] allows to deduce the maxwell equations and accounts for intrinsic properties of photons , it is incorrect , by a factor 2 , if magnetostatic interactions of electrons are considered . the definitions , describing the relations between the kinetic variables @xmath140 and the magnetic field @xmath141 , of photons and electrons correctly are written : @xmath142 the reason for this difference , which bears a superficial resemblance to the distinction between bosons and fermions ( s = @xmath143 ) , is that the two relations refer to different magnetic fields . on thorougher analysis , two different cases have to be considered : ( 1 ) the intrinsic magnetic fields , deriving from the kinetic properties of motion and oscillation , and ( 2 ) the external magnetic fields due to curvilinear motion of charge . while for photons the intrinsic electromagnetic fields have been known and dealt with in the framework of classical electrodynamics , for electrons these intrinsic fields can only be derived within material wave theory but not in quantum theory . and while the maxwell relations as an expression of intrinsic features are valid for both types of particles , the magnetostatic properties of charge apply only for electrons . the correction arises therefore from the treatment of different physical processes , and is easily understood as a reminiscence to the historical origins of the separate theories . it is tempting , at this stage , to refer the difference between fermions and bosons to the same historical origins , adopted for the concept of spin without further reflection . that the spin of particles can indeed be referred to magnetic fields , will be shown in section [ ep_spin ] . to account for magnetostatic interactions the definition of magnetic fields therefore has to be corrected . in _ homogeneous _ magnetic fields @xmath144 electron motion can be treated based on the changed definition of external magnetic fields eq . ( [ ep000 ] ) : @xmath145 the sources of @xmath146 vanish , since : @xmath147 the solution is equivalent to the traditional one : @xmath148 circular rotation in homogeneous magnetic fields is not subject to quantization , because the local component of de broglie s relation vanishes . particle density @xmath149 in any state of rotation is given by : @xmath150 then the relation between magnetic field @xmath71 and angular velocity @xmath26 will be , with eq . [ ep000 ] : @xmath151 and since @xmath152 it follows generally : @xmath153 considering the classical formulation for lorentz forces of charge in a magnetic field @xmath154 , we may write : @xmath155 which reduces in the average @xmath156 to : @xmath157 additionally , it has to be considered that rotation of mass in the rotating coordinate system gives rise to centrifugal forces described by : @xmath158 then the rotation of charge is , in the rotating coordinate system , free of forces , it is therefore its _ inertial _ state of motion in a magnetic field @xmath71 : @xmath159 but as centrifugal forces are inertial forces arising from the curvilinear path of motion , the same must apply to lorentz forces : a magnetic field determines rotation of charge , which experiences centrifugal and lorentz forces . which means , evidently , that lorentz forces must be inertial forces . the framework developed so far has some interesting consequences in electrostatic problems . defining a vector field @xmath160 by : @xmath161 and using the equation of continuity , which is equally valid for electron charge distributions : @xmath162 the vector field will be equivalent to : @xmath163 since momentum @xmath102 can be expressed in terms of @xmath164 , the wave equation also applies : @xmath165 if static problems are considered , @xmath166 will be independent of time , and using the definition of magnetic fields as well as ( [ ep002 ] ) , the statement can be rewritten in the following form : @xmath167 it is equivalent to _ ampere s law _ , if electrodynamic current density is defined by : @xmath168 in linear approximation , defining specific resistance @xmath169 by : @xmath170 and using the averages of density as well as neglecting boundary conditions , electromagnetic potentials inside a conductor will be due to sources of the electron wave vector @xmath42 : @xmath171 which means , otherwise , that the driving force of electrostatic current is the gradient of electron velocity . a possible way to show , how the system of physical units is affected by this , basically field theoretical approach to particle motion and interaction , is the following : by modeling a framework of particle motion consistent with classical electrodynamics , and comparing the energy expressions derived with energy of electron waves of hydrogen atoms , the unit of current and the electromagnetic coupling constants will be defined in terms of motion , they become _ mechanical _ units . if we consider the complementary fields of an electron or photon , we may describe their features by a vector field @xmath172 , which comprises , from an electrodynamic point of view , the dynamical situation : @xmath173 then electromagnetic fields are , similar to the formulations in classical electrodynamics , given by : @xmath174 the constants @xmath113 have to be added for reasons of consistency , since the traditional coupling of electromagnetic fields and dynamical variables can not be taken for granted . according to the definitions of @xmath175 and @xmath176 in the previous section , the @xmath113 will only be equal to unity , if @xmath177 $ ] is equal to @xmath178 $ ] . based on these definitions and the wave equation , maxwell s equations were accounted . if , on the other hand , @xmath177 $ ] is , like in classical electrodynamics , equal to energy density ( see eq . [ ed020 ] ) , then it equals @xmath179 , which has the dimensions of energy density but the direction of momentum . for reasons of consistency of the framework with classical electrodynamics the constants have to be set to unity and the vector field shall be equal to momentum per unit charge . @xmath180 then must be dimensionally equal to mechanical momentum . @xmath181 = [ p ] = \left[\frac{kg m}{s}\right]\ ] ] energy of the electromagnetic complement in terms of electromagnetic fields has to be modified accordingly . considering , that the time derivative of @xmath182 equals : @xmath183 and equally , that the energy of a particle is proportional to its frequency : @xmath184 energy density of electromagnetic complements , based on this definition of @xmath182 can be written : @xmath185 the correct relation between frequency and energy is then accounted for , while the constant @xmath180 may be estimated from hydrogen ground states . using the results of material wave theory for electron motion within a hydrogen atom @xcite and considering , that the amplitude of electromagnetic as well as kinetic energy must be double its kinetic value , @xmath180 is given by : @xmath186 \\ \hbar & = & \beta_{f } \sqrt{\frac{m_{e } } { 2 e^2}}\end{aligned}\ ] ] the unit ampere in this case is no longer free for definition , but must be expressed in terms of dynamical units m , kg , s. @xmath187 = \left[\frac{kg^{1/2}}{m s}\right]\ ] ] especially interesting is the meaning of coupling constants in this context . @xmath188 = \left[\frac{m^2}{s^2 } m^3\right ] = \left[u^2\ , v\right ] = \left[m u^2\ , \frac{v}{m}\right ] \nonumber\\ \left[\mu\right ] = \left[v\right ] \qquad \left[\alpha_{f}\right ] = \left[{\bf \epsilon}^{- 1}\right ] = \left[m u^2\ , \frac{v}{m}\right]\label{ep017}\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath189 is sommerfeld s fine structure constant . the units signify , that the coupling constants actually describe the capacity of electron matter to store dynamical energy per unit mass : they give rise to the question , treated in the following sections , how quantum theory allows for energy or charge quantization . the field corresponding to electromagnetic fields @xmath190 and @xmath191 and in longitudinal direction will be defined by : @xmath192 it is not equal to intrinsic momentum , since it is harmonic in longitudinal direction . for the plane wave @xmath193 , the fields will be : @xmath194 on a more general basis we proceed from the lagrangian of electron photon interaction in the presence of an external field @xmath195 . the procedure is pretty standard : defining the lagrange density of a particle in motion , including external potentials and a presumed photon , a variation with fixed endpoints allows to calculate photon energy density in terms of the external potential and kinetic potential of the particle , as well as accelerations of the particle due to the potential applied . so far the result is the traditional one . but using a legendre transform for small velocity variations and calculating the hamiltonian density will show , that the interaction hamiltonian is equal to photon energy , which will allow , on a very general basis , to refer all electrostatic interactions to an exchange of photons . we define the lagrangian by the total energy of the moving electron , and include total energy of a presumed photon : @xmath196 @xmath197 using the hamiltonian principle for infinitesimal variations of the system with fixed endpoints : @xmath198 taking into account that @xmath199_{t_{1}}^{t_{2 } } } _ { = \,0 } - \int\limits_{t_{1}}^{t_{2 } } dt \frac{d}{d t } \left ( \frac{\partial \dot{x}_{i}^2}{\partial \dot{x}_{i } } \right ) \delta x_{i}\ ] ] the integral may be rewritten to : @xmath200 therefore the following statement is valid : @xmath201 the dynamic relation in the absence of a photon will be : @xmath202 the legendre transform of the electron photon system in an external field yields : @xmath203 for small variations of velocity the hamiltonian of the system is given by : @xmath204 the result seems paradoxical in view of kinetic energy of the moving electron , which does not enter into the hamiltonian . assuming , that an inertial particle is accelerated in an external field , its energy density after interaction with this field would only be altered according to its alteration of location . the contradiction with the energy principle is only superficial , though . since the particle will have been accelerated , its energy density _ must _ be changed . if this change does not affect its hamiltonian , the only possible conclusion is , that photon energy has equally been changed , and that the energy acquired by acceleration has simultaneously been emitted by photon emission . the initial system was therefore over determined , and the simultaneous existence of an external field _ and _ interaction photons is no physical solution to the interaction problem . the process of electron acceleration then has to be interpreted as a process of simultaneous photon emission : the acquired kinetic energy is balanced by photon radiation . a different way to describe the same result , would be saying that electrostatic interactions are accomplished by an exchange of photons : the potential of electrostatic fields then is not so much a function of location than a history of interactions . this can be shown by calculating the hamiltonian of electron photon interaction : @xmath205 since material wave theory is based on the intrinsic features of particles , it has to account for a problem , usually treated rather sloppily in quantum theory . we refer to the problem of particle scattering . if einstein s notion of energy as an intrinsic quality of motion is taken seriously - and the present paper seeks to accomplish the same for momentum : i.e. to establish momentum @xmath64 as an intrinsic quality of particle motion - then a thorough analysis of scattering processes raises problems neither quantum theory nor electrodynamics are qualified to solve . we assume two electrons of integral momenta @xmath206 and @xmath207 to interact ; during this process their path will be changed due to electrostatic interactions @xmath208 as well as their velocity . the decisive question , in this context , is the change of internal structures given by : @xmath209 where @xmath210 as well as @xmath211 are functions of time . electric and magnetic intensity @xmath212 and @xmath213 , and their relations were shown to be consequences of the internal structure of any single electron , electrodynamics in its traditional form therefore provides no answer to the question , by what means the alteration of internal structure is brought about . the argumentation of quantum theory in this respect is , strictly speaking , illegitimate , because it is not developed beyond the simple statement , that a specific momentum causes a specific wave packet . by what means this change is accomplished , remains unanswered . from the viewpoint of field theory , the medium of transmission can only be a field , whatever its qualities may be , and this field , by way of physical interactions , must cause the internal restructuring of the second particle from the definition of electric fields eq . [ ed004 ] and the equation of continuity for electron momentum and density , it may be concluded that ( in a one dimensional simplification ) : @xmath214 the time derivative , including the equation of continuity , then yields : @xmath215 identifying the external potential as the potential of a photon : @xmath216 the source term of the electron wave equation for any of the two particles can be determined : @xmath217 as quantization arises from the interaction of single points within the considered region ( see the following sections ) , conservation of electron momentum for the two particles and , consequently , for the two photons , must hold in a very general sense for an arbitrary location within the two photons . and using , again , the equation of continuity for intrinsic momenta and potentials of the photons , the sum of the two potentials must comply with : @xmath218 if the constant of integration equals zero , the total field of the two photons will vanish for every external observer : @xmath219 a specific feature of a component @xmath220 of the overall field will be , that it does not depend on the distance from its source @xmath221 : @xmath222 it is a consequence of ( [ ep031 ] ) , because if intensity would in some way depend on the distance @xmath223 , linear momentum could not remain constant for the system of two particles . if the external and static field @xmath224 is the field of an interacting particle , then emission and absorption will be balanced . the traditional hamiltonian , in this case , correctly describes dynamical variables of interaction , although only due to the - hidden - process of photon exchange . it is evident that neither emission , nor absorption of photons at this stage does show discrete energy levels : the alteration of velocity can be chosen arbitrarily small . the interesting question seems to be , how quantization fits into this picture of continuous processes . to understand this paradoxon , we consider the transfer of energy due to the infinitesimal interaction process . the differential of energy is given by : @xmath225 a denotes the cross section of interaction . setting @xmath226 equal to one period @xmath227 , and considering , that the energy transfer during this interval will be @xmath228 , we get for the transfer rate : @xmath229 since total energy density of the particle as well as the photon remains constant , the statement is generally valid . and therefore the transfer rate in interaction processes will be : @xmath230 the result was already quoted ( see section [ sec_ed ] ) . and it was equally emphasized , that the term energy quantum is , from the point of view taken in material wave theory , not quite appropriate . the total value of energy transferred depends , in this context , on the region subject to interaction processes , and equally , as will be seen further on , on the duration of the emission process . the view taken in quantum theory is therefore only a good approximation : a thorougher concept , of which material wave theory in its present form is only the outline , will have to account for _ every _ possible variation in the interaction processes . but even on this , limited , basis of understanding , planck s constant , commonly considered the fundamental value of energy quantization is the fundamental constant not of energy values , but of transfer rates in dynamic processes . constant transfer rates furthermore have the consequence , that volume and mass values of photons or electrons become irrelevant : the basic relations for energy and dispersion remain valid regardless of actual quantities . quantization then is , in short , a _ result of energy transfer _ and its characteristics . * if intrinsic features of particles and their interactions are considered , quantization has to be interpreted as a result of energy transfer processes and their specific properties . the photon interaction process leading to the acceleration of particles in an electrostatic field is accounted for by the field vector @xmath231 , of longitudinal orientation and including the effects of different field polarizations : @xmath232 elementary charge e shall be the flow through a surface of the field @xmath231 in unit time @xmath233 : @xmath234 integrating over a spherical surface with r = 1 and evaluating the time integral yields : @xmath235 the result is consistent with the source relation of electrostatic fields , since ( in si units ) : @xmath236 @xmath237 and the flow in unit time per unit volume is then : @xmath238 the calculation yields the numerically correct result . it is also dimensionally consistent , if it is considered , that it refers to unit volume and in unit time . the elementary quantum of charge is therefore not exactly a quantity of some physical variable , but , consistent with previous results , a measure for dynamical energy transfer rates per unit time . charge quantization is the consequence of _ photon interaction processes and their specific energy transfer rates_. * the elementary quantum of electron charge derives from energy transfer rates in electrostatic interactions , which are an expression of the interaction process accomplished by photons . using the result for @xmath180 in terms of e , planck s constant equally is not a fundamental constant but can be referred to dynamic interaction rates of particles and fields ( dimensions again corrected ) : @xmath239 comparing with the values for @xmath240 based on codata recommendation for a consistent system of fundamental constants @xcite , the result deviates by about 2.5 % : @xmath241 but considering , that the result was obtained by a completely different approach and , furthermore , that it is the first _ direct _ relation between the three fundamental constants @xmath242 without any additional parameter , the numerical value seems in acceptable accordance with current data . if the relation holds , then the consequences for the framework of quantum theory are significant . its essential conception , the interpretation of discrete frequency , mass and charge values as discrete quantities determining physical processes can , from this viewpoint , no longer be sustained . all processes analyzed so far , were found to be continuous in nature , and the appearance of discrete interaction quanta had to be referred to constant transfer rates applying to every single point of the underlying fields . * on the basis of electron photon interactions planck s constant in material wave theory only applies to interactions and transfer processes . a justification of discrete frequencies , mass or charge values from the viewpoint of allowed _ states _ can not be given in material wave theory . the result indicates , that the formalism of quantum theory lacks justification if it refers discrete energy levels to isolated particles . the result provides the logical reason for the deeply rooted epistemological problem of quantum theory expressed by heisenberg ( see ref . @xcite ) : if quantization is only appropriate for interactions , i.e. measurement processes , then the results of quantum theory can only hold for actual measurement processes . but since the formalism of quantum theory is based on single _ eigenstates _ , meaning states of isolated particles , this logical structure is not accounted for by the mathematical foundations of quantum theory . while , therefore , the mathematical formalism suggests a validity beyond any actual measurement , it can only be applied to specific measurements . what it amounts to , in short , is a logical inconsistency in the fundamental statements of quantum theory . the assumption of invariant charge , i.e. the conception , that charge remains invariant regardless of the interaction process or the surrounding , is not compatible with the results so far . if charge can only be determined by its photon interactions with other charge a result of the previous sections and if the term charge refers to the _ electromagnetic _ qualities of this interaction as described by the change of kinetic variables of charged particles then the _ charge _ of a particle must be referred to the dynamic qualities of interaction photons . as the dynamic qualities of a photon ( not accounting for transversal properties which will be treated in the next section ) are completely determined by ( 1 ) its frequency @xmath1 and ( 2 ) its momentum @xmath243 , the possible interactions of two particles of mass @xmath15 and charge @xmath244 e must be accomplished by a photon with linear momentum @xmath245 described by ( propagation assumed parallel to @xmath246 : @xmath247 the energy of the photon in every case equals @xmath23 , both forms comply with the wave equation for linear intrinsic momentum and yield identical transversal fields , the difference , though , is that the form @xmath248 can not be interpreted as a particle , because its momentum variable has the opposite direction of propagation . * the interpretation of electrostatic interactions as an exchange of photons , proper to material wave theory , has the consequence , that ( 1 ) the properties of single charges can only be referred to interactions with the environment , ( 2 ) photons can only be interpreted as particles if two identical charges interact , and ( 3 ) electrostatic potentials depend on the possibility of photon exchanges . while for two separate charges the third consequence is of no effect , it can not be assumed a priori , that aggregations of charge typical for nuclear environments will provide a mode of photon interactions . but if atomic nuclei do not provide a mode of photon interaction between individual nuclear particles , then electrostatic considerations do not apply to the problem of nuclear stability . so far the vector characteristics of electromagnetic fields have not been accounted for . the problem of electron photon interaction in this case requires a closer scrutiny of the energy transfer process itself . consistent with classical electrodynamics it may be postulated , that electromagnetic fields may be superimposed . in this case the vector field @xmath249 of an electron and interacting photon is given by : @xmath250 and consistent with the framework developed it may be stated , that total energy density at any location of the electron must be equal to : @xmath251 using ( [ ep014 ] ) and ( [ ep015 ] ) the energy relation yields : @xmath252 the energy is altered depending on the angle between electromagnetic field vectors of electron and interacting photon . the equation has the same structure as the energy relation in classical mechanics , it does not refer , though , to any longitudinal characteristic . even if longitudinal vectors are parallel , the difference in transversal fields must account for energy deviations . taking two identical @xmath47vectors and assuming , that every angle of deviation is equally probable , then the @xmath47vector after interaction will be in average : @xmath253 and if @xmath254 is considered as the undisturbed interaction energy , then the average deviations are given by : @xmath255 to estimate the importance of polarizations consider two electrons with arbitrary initial velocities and different orientation of intrinsic electromagnetic fields to interact . then the electromagnetic fields of the photons of interaction will show successively shifted angles and the kinetic characteristics of particle motion will be affected in a way not described by electrodynamics . it is this process , which must ultimately lead to a shift of scattering cross sections already predicted and confirmed by quantum theory . as a mathematical framework to calculate scattering processes on a dynamical basis complicated by the fact that the standard scattering approximations are bound to fail , since no potential can be defined for the angular dependency of photon interaction has not yet been developed , the exact changes compared to quantum theory can not currently be exhibited . david bohm devised a gedankenexperiment to differ between the theory of hidden variables and quantum theory @xcite , which was based on the assumption , that the direction of spin is a true but hidden variable . as bell formulated in his inequalities , the consequence of such an assumption leads to consequences , which should be , in principle , measurable @xcite . measurements of these consequences by aspect seemed to confirm , that a local theory of hidden variables is contradictory @xcite . any theory , thus the result , which assumes hidden variables of this type , is contradicted by measurements . this conclusion is not undisputed , as thompson recently showed by the chaotic ball model of this type of measurements @xcite . the usual interpretation , the author concluded , which assumes quantum theory to be superior to local hidden variable theories , contains a biased interpretation of experimental data . the theoretical framework of material waves , which can be seen as an extension of electrodynamics to intrinsic particle properties , is basically a local theory . particle spin is a local variable , and the theory is therefore a realistic and local theory of hidden variables , although , and this seems to be an important difference to bohm s concept , classical electrodynamics _ and _ quantum theory were shown to result from specific limitations . on these grounds the conflict of a measurement presumably excluding hidden variables in a local theory and a concept which explicitly goes beyond the limits of formalization of the quantum theory , on which evaluation of these measurements is based ( like the current framework ) , can only be clarified by exclusion . if these measurements are also in the current framework valid _ within _ the limits of quantum theory , then the current framework must be ruled out , since it contradicts experimental evidence of a highly consistent and successful theory . but if , on the other hand , these measurements do not yield valid results within the framework of quantum theory , then this experiment is not conclusive , because its interpretation presupposes theoretical formulations which have been violated . in this case an alternative interpretation of the measurements is possible , which is based on a different theory . although it can not currently be determined _ what _ was actually measured in aspect s experiments , it can be excluded that the measured result was obtained within the limits of quantum theory . and since bell s inequalities , which provided the theoretical background of interpretation , are based on the axioms of quantum theory , the interpretation of these results is questionable . we will return to these results in later publications . in the present framework spin is local and parallel to the polarization of the intrinsic magnetic field @xmath71 which can be shown as follows : the energy relations in classical electrodynamics yield , for a mass of magnetic moment @xmath256 in a magnetic field @xmath71 , the following energy : @xmath257 the following deduction is based on four assumptions : ( 1 ) the energy of an electron or photon is equal to the energy of the particle in quantum theory , ( 2 ) the magnetic field is the intrinsic ( photon ) or external ( electron ) magnetic field , ( 3 ) the frequency @xmath26 is also a frequency of rotation , and ( 4 ) the magnetic moment is described by the relations in quantum theory . with ( 1 ) the energy of photons ( total energy ) and electrons ( only kinetic energy ) will be : @xmath258 with ( 2 ) the magnetic fields of electrons and photons will be ( see eq . [ ep001 ] ) : @xmath259 and with ( 4 ) the magnetic moment will be ( @xmath260 denotes the gyromagnetic ratio ) : @xmath261 calculating the energy of interaction and considering , that the magnetic field in the current framework is @xmath96 times the magnetic field in classical electrodynamics ( see eq . [ ed009 ] ) , we get for the photon : @xmath262 with @xmath263 , which follows from the definition of magnetic fields ( see section [ ed_units ] ) , the relation can only hold for constant @xmath264 if : @xmath265 the energy relation of electrodynamics in this case is only consistent with the energy of photons of they possess intrinsic spin @xmath266 , a gyromagnetic ratio of 1 , and if the direction of spin polarization is equal to the direction of intrinsic magnetic fields . a consistent framework therefore requires ( 1 ) a localized spin , and ( 2 ) a spin @xmath266 of bosons . the same calculation for the properties of electron spin yields the following result : @xmath267 in principle the spin variable and the gyromagnetic ratio could be chosen like the values for photons . from the condition itself , the difference between bosons and fermions is not directly accessible . the difference can be accounted for , if the atomic model in quantum theory is considered : the theory of hydrogen fine structures by uhlenbeck and goudsmit @xcite requires two energy levels symmetric to the undisturbed one , thus a general multiplicity of 2 . the only solution , with this initial assumption , is a spin variable of @xmath268 and a gyromagnetic ratio of 2 . the direction of spin polarization is also for fermions equal to the direction of the magnetic field vector . generally the concept of spin seems questionable , because the frequency @xmath26 is not at all to be confused with rotation frequencies of a particle . consider , for example , a photon in uniform motion @xmath96 along a flat space time geometry . its intrinsic magnetic field does not determine any state of rotation , nor does the energy of a photon result from the interaction of a photon magnetic moment with a magnetic field . from the given deduction of spin properties of particles ( and the deduction seems highly appropriate , considering the effect of spin operators in the framework of quantum theory ) it seems , that the concept itself must be theoretically deficient . let us consider , on this basis , the result of any realistic measurement of photon spin in an epr like situation @xcite . the first problem , we are confronted with , is the exact definition of the spin value . from the given deduction it seems evident , that the local direction of the spin vector is either parallel or antiparallel to the intrinsic magnetic field . provided , we adopt the view of quantum theory for spin conservation of two photons , then spin up would mean , that the vector is antiparallel to @xmath71 , spin down means , it must be parallel . in this case we have two photons with an arbitrary angle @xmath269 of polarization in the state + 1 for photon one and -1 for photon two ( see fig . [ fig001 ] ) . = 1.0 the second problem originates from the periodic features of the intrinsic magnetic field . since the magnetic field vector is periodic with @xmath270 , the spin variable _ can not _ remain constant , but must oscillate from + 1 to - 1 . this oscillation requires , that we define the exact moment of measurement to obtain any valid result on the state of either particle . if the photon path remains constant in measurements , this requirement is fulfilled , but if , like in aspect s measurements @xcite , the measuring apparatus has to be rotated to account for different angles of observation , the effect on measurements seems not easy to estimate . this problem therefore leads to a problem of experimental methods , which is hidden in the usual argumentation of quantum theory . provided , the problem can be accounted for , our next problem is more substantial . since the spin variable oscillates , the measurement can only yield a definite result , if the variable is measured in the time interval @xmath271 , which requires , that the local resolution of the measuring apparatus is below @xmath272 . now as demonstrated in the deduction of the uncertainty relations , this interval is equal to the lowest limit of local resolution in the framework of quantum theory . thus we get the result , that a valid measurement of the spin variable must have a local precision which is explicitly beyond the fundamental uncertainty in quantum theory . if , therefore , the measurements yield any correlation related to physical processes , then the fundamental axioms of quantum theory must be violated . this result seems to turn the controversy about the epr paradox into a new direction . it can be established , that the mathematical framework of quantum theory , describing the state of either particle by a superposition of the two possible states @xmath244 1 is correct . but it can equally be established , that a significant correlation in spin measurements is not , as einstein suspected , a proof of hidden variables or a contradiction in terms of special relativity , but a proof of measurements below the fundamental level of uncertainty . if this sort of measurement is possible , then the uncertainty relations are violated . * if epr measurements are possible and yield a significant correlation for a pair of spin particles , then the uncertainty relations are violated . in section [ sec_ed ] it was established , that electromagnetic radiation consists of two distinct intrinsic variables : ( 1 ) a longitudinal momentum , and ( 2 ) a transversal electromagnetic field , both variables depending on the frequency of radiation . in this section we found , that the change of energy density due to the adsorption of a photon result in motion of the absorbing electron , the energy increase given by : @xmath273 if monochromatic x rays therefore interact with free electrons , i.e. electrons with a velocity small compared to @xmath274 , then the absorbing electrons should move in longitudinal direction with a velocity equal to : @xmath275 if this electron is decelerated , then it will emit electromagnetic radiation with a frequency described by : @xmath276 and , depending on the duration of the deceleration process , the radiation can possess arbitrarily low frequency . this _ primary _ emission therefore will not exhibit discrete frequency levels . but if _ secondary _ processes are considered , then the frequency change will depend on ( 1 ) the relative velocity between the source of radiation and the moving electron , and ( 2 ) the emission and absorption characteristics . assuming , that the emission and absorption processes are symmetric in terms of duration , then the frequency of secondary emission will depend on the original frequency as well as the angle of emission . the model presented is therefore a simplification , and it can not be excluded , that a precise and deterministic picture of the whole process will not yield a deviating result . but compared to the standard model in quantum theory @xcite , it is nevertheless an improvement , because it does not have to recur to mechanical concepts . if the electron moves in longitudinal direction and with a velocity equal to @xmath277 , the frequency @xmath278 of the source will be changed due to the electromagnetic doppler effect . the secondary absorption process therefore has to account for a frequency @xmath279 : @xmath280 an observer moving with the velocity @xmath277 of the electron will therefore measure changed frequencies and wavelengths of secondary emission . the wavelength @xmath281 will be : @xmath282 the second term , the shift of wavelength due to longitudinal motion of the electron relative to the source of radiation , is the _ compton wavelength _ of an electron @xcite . it is the general shift of wavelength for every electromagnetic field , and an expression of longitudinal motion . @xmath283 additionally it has to be considered , that the reference frame of observation is the same as the reference frame of the original radiation , thus a second frequency shift depends on the angle of observation @xmath269 . measured from the direction of field propagation this additional shift will be : @xmath284 and the overall shift of wavelength measured is therefore : @xmath285 the result is equivalent to compton s measurements . compton scattering , in our view , is therefore a result of ( 1 ) secondary absorption and emission processes , and of ( 2 ) successive doppler shifts due to longitudinal motion of the emitting electrons . that classical electrodynamics does not provide a theoretical model for compton scattering , can be understood as a consequence of neglecting longitudinal and kinetic features of photons . since electromagnetic radiation in electrodynamics is interpreted from transversal properties alone ( which are periodic ) , a uniform longitudinal motion due to absorption processes is not within its theoretical limits . the possibility to account for quantum effects with the modified and still continuous model of electrons is strongly supporting , in our view , the validity of the unification of electrodynamics and quantum theory by formalizing the intrinsic features of particles . as it turns out , retrospectively , the theory of material waves removes the two fundamental problems , which made a physical interpretation ( as opposed to the probability interpretation @xcite ) of intrinsic wave properties impossible . ( 1 ) the contradiction between phase velocity and mechanical velocity of a particle wave is removed by the discovery of intrinsic potentials . ( 2 ) the problem of intrinsic coulomb interactions is removed , because electrostatic interactions can be referred to an exchange of photons . a particle in uniform motion is therefore stable . to exhibit the full range of logical and physical implications of the theory developed , we repeat the essential results of this essay on material waves , displayed throughout the preceding sections of this paper : 1 . the interpretation of particles as physical waves allows the conclusion , that quantum theory can not be , in a logical sense , a complete theoretical description of micro physical systems . 2 . _ because _ quantum theory neglects intrinsic characteristics of particle motion , the schrdinger equation is generally not precise by a value described by heisenberg s uncertainty relations . electrodynamics and wave mechanics are theoretical concepts based on the same physical phenomena , the intrinsic features of moving particles . 4 . the wave equations of intrinsic particle structures are lorentz invariant only for an integral evaluation of energy . the total intrinsic potentials increase for every transformation into a moving frame of reference . if intrinsic features of particles and their interactions are considered , quantization has to be interpreted as a result of energy transfer processes and their specific properties . the elementary quantum of electron charge derives from energy transfer rates in electrostatic interactions , which are an expression of the interaction process accomplished by photons . 7 . on the basis of electron photon interactions planck s constant in material wave theory only applies to interactions and transfer processes . a justification of discrete frequencies , mass or charge values from the viewpoint of allowed _ states _ can not be given . the result indicates , that the formalism of quantum theory lacks justification if it refers discrete energy levels to isolated particles . the interpretation of electrostatic interactions as an exchange of photons , proper to material wave theory , has the consequence , that ( 1 ) the properties of single charges can only be referred to interactions with the environment , ( 2 ) photons can only be interpreted as particles if two identical charges interact , and ( 3 ) electrostatic potentials depend on the possibility of photon exchanges . 9 . if epr measurements are possible and yield a significant correlation for a pair of spin particles , then the uncertainty relations are violated . = 1.0 the theoretical framework thus provides definite answers to the epr paradox by rejecting the copenhagen interpretation of quantum theory @xcite , because ( 1 ) quantum theory is not a complete account of micro physical systems , since the wave function possesses physical significance , and ( 2 ) the theory is logically inconsistent , since it is applicable only to interaction processes , while its mathematical formulation suggests the results to derive from properties of individual particles . concerning renninger s objections on the quality of photons derived from thought experiments @xcite , it provides a model of photons where ( 1 ) the energy is homogeneously distributed over the whole region of electromagnetic fields , ( 2 ) the kinetic features of photons derive from a longitudinal component not accounted for in electrodynamics , and ( 3 ) the energy transfer in interactions applies for every single point of a given region , which yields the quantum effect of interaction . it is difficult to estimate either the impact or the subsequent changes due to a concept , which completely deviates from the mainstream of current physics . the aim of establishing and , to a limited extent , interpreting a physical reality by an alternative framework was to provide a means , by which experimental results can be seen from at least two different points of view . the fundamental idea , it seems , is not very different from the conceptions of einstein , schrdinger , bohm , or de broglie ( see the introduction ) , but the disregard of well established interpretations is considerably higher . this was not , initially , intended . it only turned out , that a theoretical concept limited to only minor changes will neither provide a scientifically satisfying solution since it still is based on some _ have to believe _ nor does it really offer any new insight into micro physical processes . it was not intended to recover all the results of current quantum physics , not least , because it would surely require many lifetimes to succeed . but it was intended , and , so i think , accomplished rather successfully , to extend the theoretical framework of micro physics beyond the uncertainty relations and the _ we can not know _ of quantum theory . whether the result presented it the best possible way out of the dilemma arising from a physics of quantities mechanics confronted with a world of intensities electrodynamics can not be currently estimated . to estimate the epistemological changes implied by the theoretical framework , fig . [ fig002 ] displays the logical structure of micro physics in material wave theory . to estimate , whether the new theory contradicts any experimental evidence within its range of formalization , it has to be considered , that it provides a meta theory combining the different frameworks of electrodynamics , quantum theory , and quantum electrodynamics in a single consistent framework . from the viewpoint of electrodynamics , it will reproduce any result the current framework provides , because the basic relations are not changed , merely interpreted in terms of electron and photon propagation . therefore an experiment , consistent with electrodynamics , will also be consistent with the new theory . in quantum theory , the only statements additional to the original framework are beyond the level of experimental validity , defined by the uncertainty relations . since quantum theory can not , in principle , contain results beyond that level , every experiment within the framework of quantum theory must necessarily be reproduced . that applies to the results of wave mechanics , which yields the eigenvalues of physical processes , as well as to the results of operator calculations , if von neumann s proof of the equivalence of schrdinger s equation and the commutator relations is valid . the only result , which could in this respect disprove the theory , is the spreading of a wave packet : but as this experimental result was the reason , that a _ physical _ interpretation of wave functions had to be discarded , the theory also in this respect seems to stand on firm ground . in quantum field theory , the same rule applies : the new theory only states , what is , in quantum theory , no part of a measurement result , therefore a contradiction can not exist . if , on the other hand , results in quantum electrodynamics exist , which are not yet verified by the new theory , then it is rather a problem of further development , but not of a contradiction with existing measurements . experimentally , the new theory can not be disproved by existing measurements , because its statements at once verify the existing formulations and extend the framework of theoretical calculations . the same does not hold , though , for the verification of existing theoretical schemes of calculation by the new framework . since the theory extends far beyond the level of current concepts , established theoretical results may well be subject to revision . the theory of material waves requires , that every valid solution of a microphysical problem can be referred to physical properties of particle waves . in cases , where the established theory provides a solution yielding , for example , correct eigenvalues but not wave functions which can be identified as _ physical _ waves , the result is , from this viewpoint , questionable . essentially , this is not limiting nor diminishing the validity of current results , since it extends the framework of micro physics only to regions , which so far have remained unconsidered . from the five tasks defined in the introduction as our personal criterium for a promising new approach , three have been accomplished by this publication . but as quantum theory , historically , was invented due to the puzzling results in atomic physics , the whole concept as such would be useless without a theory of atoms compatible with the framework developed . this theory has partly been published already ( see @xcite ) , partly it is still in the making although the essential results have been derived . it will be the aim of the next paper published in the internet , to give a thorough and up to date account of a model of hydrogen atoms in terms of material waves . schweber s. _ qed and the men who made it _ , princeton ( 1994 ) bohm d. _ causality and chance in modern physics _ , princeton ( 1957 ) de broglie l. in his foreword to @xcite dirac p.a.m . j. phys . _ * 5 * , 65 ( 1984 ) rseberg u. in gtschl j. ( ed . ) _ erwin schrdinger s world view _ , dordrecht ( 1992 ) p. 135 feynman r. _ qed _ , princeton ( 1988 ) p.9 schrdinger , e. _ ann . physik _ * 79 * , 361 ; 489 ( 1926 ) heisenberg w. `` remarks on the origin of uncertainty '' in price w. c. ( ed . ) _ the uncertainty principle and the foundations of quantum mechanics _ , wiley & sons , new york ( 1977 ) bohr n. `` discussion with einstein on epistemological problems in atomic physics '' , in _ a. einstein : philosopher scientist _ , schilpp p.a . ( ed . ) , harper and row , new york ( 1959 ) de broglie l. _ ann . phys . _ * 3 * , 22 ( 1925 ) born , m. _ z. physik _ * 37 * , 863 ( 1926 ) einstein a. , rosen n. , and podolsky b. _ phys . _ * 47 * , 180 ( 1935 ) kwiat p. , weinfurter h. , herzog t. , zeilinger a. , and kasevich m.a . lett . _ * 74 * , 4763 ( 1995 ) renninger m. _ zeitschr . f. phys . _ * 158 * , 417 ( 1960 ) bohm , d. _ phys . rev . _ * 85 * , 166 ; 180 ( 1952 ) bell j.s . _ physics _ * 1 * , 195 ( 1964 ) ; see also his remarks on hidden variable theories in _ rev . mod . phys . _ * 38 * , 447 ( 1966 ) davisson c. and germer l.h . rev . _ * 30 * , 705 ( 1927 ) hofer w. a. internal energy of free particles : de broglie waves in electrodynamics . tech . _ * 18 * , 157 ( 1995 ) hofer w. a. an inertial model of atoms : atomic spectra as a resonance problem . _ specs . _ , in print born m. , heisenberg w. , and jordan p. _ z. physik _ * 35 * , 557 ( 1926 ) planck m. _ ann . physik _ * 4 * , 553 ( 1901 ) heisenberg w. _ z. physik _ * 43 * , 172 ( 1927 ) cohen tannoudji c. , diu b. , and laloe f. _ quantum mechanics _ , wiley & sons , new york ( 1977 ) einstein a. _ ann . * 17 * , 891 ( 1905 ) sommerfeld a. _ elektrodynamik _ , akademische verlagsgesellschaft , reprint leipzig ( 1964 ) michelson , and morley . j. sci . _ * 34 * , 333 ( 1887 ) ; _ phil . mag . _ * 24 * , 449 ( 1887 ) jackson j. _ classical electrodynamics _ , wiley & sons , new york ( 1984 ) einstein a. _ ann . physik _ * 17 * , 132 ( 1905 ) jordan p. _ anschauliche quantentheorie _ , berlin ( 1936 ) p. 115 heisenberg w. _ die physikalischen grundlagen der quantentheorie _ , leipzig ( 1941 ) p. 7 and 107 renninger m. _ z. physik _ * 136 * , 251 ( 1953 ) a. einstein . * 20 * , 627 ( 1906 ) uipap document uip 20 . _ physica a _ * 93 * , 1 ( 1978 ) bohm d. _ quantum mechanics _ , prentice hall , eaglewood cliffs ( 1951 ) aspect a. _ trois tests experimenteaux des inegalites de bell par mesure de correlation de polarisation de photons _ , ph . d. thesis , universite de paris sud , centre dorsay ( 1983 ) thompson c. h. _ found . lett . _ * 9 * , 357 ( 1996 ) uhlenbeck g. e. and goudsmit s. a. _ naturwiss . _ * 13 * , 953 ( 1925 ) ; and _ nature _ * 117 * , 264 ( 1925 ) debye , p. _ phys . zeitschr . _ * 24 * , 161 ( 1923 ) compton , a. h. _ phys . * 22 * , 409 ( 1923 ) Abstract:

Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.

Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered . Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video . Paper: the motivation for the study reported in this paper comes from the celebrated and long - standing problem , originally posed by erds @xcite in 1946 , of obtaining a sharp lower bound for the number of distinct distances guaranteed to exist in any set @xmath0 of @xmath1 points in the plane . erds has shown that a section of the integer lattice determines only @xmath10 distinct distances , and conjectured this to be a lower bound for any planar point set . in spite of steady progress on this problem , reviewed next , erds s conjecture is still open . l. moser @xcite , chung @xcite , and chung @xcite proved that the number of distinct distances determined by @xmath1 points in the plane is @xmath11 , @xmath12 , and @xmath13 , respectively . szkely @xcite managed to get rid of the polylogarithmic factor , while solymosi and tth @xcite improved this bound to @xmath14 . this was a real breakthrough . their analysis was subsequently refined by tardos @xcite and then by katz and tardos @xcite , who obtained the current record of @xmath15 , for any @xmath16 , which is @xmath17 . in this paper we transform the problem of distinct distances in the plane to an incidence problem between points and a certain kind of curves ( helices or parabolas ) in three dimensions . as we show , sharp upper bounds on the number of such incidences translate back to sharp lower bounds on the number of distinct distances . incidence problems in three dimensions between points and curves have been studied in several recent works @xcite , and a major push in this direction has been made last year , with the breakthrough result of guth and katz @xcite , who have introduced methods from algebraic geometry for studying problems of this kind . this has been picked up by the authors @xcite , where worst - case tight bounds on the number of incidences between points and lines in three dimensions ( under certain restrictions ) have been obtained . the present paper serves two purposes . first , it studies in detail the connection between the distinct distances problem and the corresponding 3-dimensional incidence problem . as it turns out , there is a lot of interesting geometric structure behind this reduction , and the paper develops it in detail . we offer several conjectures on the number of incidences , and show how , if true , they yield the almost tight worst - case lower bound @xmath9 on the number of distinct distances . unfortunately , so far we have not succeeded in proving these conjectures . nevertheless , we have made considerable progress on the incidence problem itself , which is the second purpose of the study in this paper . we show how to adapt the algebraic machinery of @xcite to derive sharp bounds for the incidence problem . @xcite to derive sharp bounds for the incidence problem . these bounds are very similar to , and in fact even better than the bounds obtained in @xcite for point - line incidences , where they have been shown to be worst - case tight . however , they are not ( yet ) good enough to yield significant lower bounds for distinct distances . we believe that there is additional geometric structure in the particular problem studied here , which should enable one to further improve the bounds , but so far this remains elusive . the paper is organized as follows . we first describe the reduction from the planar distinct distances problem to the 3-dimensional incidence problem mentioned above . in doing so , we note and explore several additional geometric connections between the two problems ( as manifested , e.g. , in the analysis of _ special surfaces _ given below ) . we then present the tools from algebraic geometry that are needed to tackle the incidence problem ; they are variants of the tools used in @xcite , adapted to the specific curves that we need to handle . we then go on to bound the number of incidences . we first bound the number of rotations in terms of the number of parabolas , and then bound the number of incidences themselves . the latter task is achieved in two steps . we first use a `` purely algebraic '' analysis , akin to those in @xcite , to obtain a weaker bound , which we then refine in the second step , using more traditional space decomposition techniques . the final bound is still not as good as we would like it to be , but it shows that the case studied in this paper `` behaves better '' than its counterpart involving lines . [ [ distinct - distances - and - incidences - with - helices . ] ] distinct distances and incidences with helices . + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + we offer the following novel approach to the problem of distinct distances . [ [ h1-notation . ] ] ( h1 ) notation . + + + + + + + + + + + + + + let @xmath0 be a set of @xmath1 points in the plane with @xmath18 distinct distances . let @xmath19 denote the set of all quadruples @xmath20 , such that the pairs @xmath21 and @xmath22 are distinct ( although the points themselves need not be ) and @xmath23 . let @xmath24 denote the @xmath18 distinct distances in @xmath0 , and let @xmath25 . we have @xmath26 ^ 2 = \frac{\left[s(s-1)-x\right]^2}{x } .\ ] ] [ [ h2-rotations . ] ] ( h2 ) rotations . + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + we associate each @xmath27 with a ( unique ) _ rotation _ ( or , rather , a rigid , orientation - preserving transformation of the plane ) @xmath28 , which maps @xmath29 to @xmath30 and @xmath31 to @xmath32 . a rotation @xmath28 , in complex notation , can be written as the transformation @xmath33 , where @xmath34 and @xmath35 . putting @xmath36 , @xmath37 , we can represent @xmath28 by the point @xmath38 . in the planar context , @xmath39 is the counterclockwise angle of the rotation , and the center of rotation is @xmath40 , which is defined for @xmath41 ; for @xmath42 , @xmath28 is a pure translation . the _ multiplicity _ @xmath43 of a rotation @xmath28 ( with respect to @xmath0 ) is defined as @xmath44 the number of pairs @xmath45 such that @xmath46 . clearly , one always has @xmath47 , and we will mostly consider only rotations satisfying @xmath48 . as a matter of fact , the bulk of the paper will only consider rotations with multiplicity at least @xmath49 . rotations with multiplicity @xmath50 are harder to analyze . if @xmath51 then @xmath0 contains two congruent and equally oriented copies @xmath52 of some @xmath5-element set , such that @xmath53 . thus , studying multiplicities of rotations is closely related to analyzing repeated ( congruent and equally oriented ) patterns in a planar point set ; see @xcite for a review of many problems of this kind . [ [ anti - rotations . ] ] anti - rotations . + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + in this paper we will also consider _ anti - rotations _ , which are rigid , orientation - reversing transformations of the plane . any anti - rotation can be represented as a rotation , followed by a reflection about some fixed line , e.g. , the @xmath18-axis ( so , in complex notation , this can be written as @xmath54 ) . anti - rotations will be useful in certain steps of the analysis . [ [ h3-bounding - k . ] ] ( h3 ) bounding @xmath55 . + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + if @xmath51 then @xmath28 contributes @xmath56 quadruples to @xmath19 . let @xmath57 ( resp . , @xmath58 ) denote the number of rotations with multiplicity exactly @xmath5 ( resp . , at least @xmath5 ) , for @xmath8 . then @xmath59 [ [ h4-the - main - conjecture . ] ] ( h4 ) the main conjecture . + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + [ conj1 ] for any @xmath60 , we have @xmath61 suppose that the conjecture were true . then we would have @xmath62 ^ 2}{x } \le |k| = o(s^3 ) \cdot \left [ 1 + \sum_{k\ge 3 } \frac{1}{k } \right ] = o(s^3\log s ) , \ ] ] which would have implied that @xmath63 . this would have almost settled the problem of obtaining a tight bound for the minimum number of distinct distances guaranteed to exist in any set of @xmath1 points in the plane , since , as mentioned above , the upper bound for this quantity is @xmath10 @xcite . we note that conjecture [ conj1 ] is rather deep ; even the simple instance @xmath64 , asserting that there are only @xmath3 rotations which map ( at least ) two points of @xmath0 to two other points of @xmath0 ( at the same distance apart ) , seems quite difficult . in this paper we establish a variety of upper bounds on the number of rotations and on the sum of their multiplicities . in particular , these results provide a partial positive answer , showing that @xmath65 ; that is , the number of rotations which map a ( degenerate or non - degenerate ) triangle determined by @xmath0 to another congruent ( and equally oriented ) such triangle , is @xmath3 . bounding @xmath66 by @xmath3 is still an open problem . see section [ sec : impr ] for a simple proof of the weaker bound @xmath67 . [ [ lower - bound . ] ] lower bound . + + + + + + + + + + + + we next give a construction ( suggested by haim kaplan ) which shows : [ lem : lower ] there exist sets @xmath0 in the plane of arbitrarily large cardinality , which determine @xmath68 distinct rotations , each mapping a triple of points of @xmath0 to another triple of points of @xmath0 . * proof : * consider the set @xmath69 , where @xmath70 see figure [ lower ] . lower.pstex_t for each triple @xmath71 such that @xmath72 also belongs to @xmath73 , construct the rotation @xmath74 which maps @xmath75 to @xmath76 and @xmath77 to @xmath78 . since the distance between the two source points is equal to the distance between their images , @xmath74 is well ( and uniquely ) defined . moreover , @xmath74 maps the midpoint @xmath79 to the midpoint @xmath80 . we claim that the rotations @xmath74 are all distinct . indeed , suppose that two such rotations , @xmath74 and @xmath81 , for distinct triples @xmath82 , @xmath83 , coincide ; call the common rotation @xmath28 . we can represent @xmath28 as the rigid transformation which first translates the plane horizontally by distance @xmath84 , so that @xmath75 is mapped to @xmath76 , and then rotates it around @xmath76 by an appropriate angle @xmath85 , so that @xmath86 is mapped to @xmath78 . suppose first that @xmath87 . since @xmath88 , it maps @xmath89 to @xmath90 and then rotates this point by angle @xmath39 around @xmath76 , mapping it to a point outside the @xmath18-axis , contradicting the fact that @xmath81 maps @xmath89 to @xmath91 . if @xmath92 then we also must have @xmath93 , so @xmath94 . but then it is impossible to turn , around @xmath76 , the shifted point @xmath86 to @xmath78 and the shifted point @xmath95 to @xmath96 , by the same angle , a contradiction which shows that the two rotations are distinct . since there are @xmath97 triples @xmath82 with the above properties , the claim follows . @xmath98 * remarks . * * ( 1 ) * a `` weakness '' of this construction is that all the rotations @xmath74 map a _ collinear _ triple of points of @xmath0 to another collinear triple . ( in the terminology to follow , these will be called _ flat _ rotations . ) we do not know whether the number of rotations which map a _ non - collinear _ triple of points of @xmath0 to another non - collinear triple can be @xmath99 . we tend to conjecture that this is indeed the case . * ( 2 ) * we do not know whether conjecture [ conj1 ] is worst - case tight ( if true ) . that is , we do not know whether there exist sets @xmath0 , with @xmath100 arbitrarily large , so that there are @xmath101 distinct rotations , each mapping at least @xmath5 points of @xmath0 to @xmath5 other points of @xmath0 . [ [ h5-helices . ] ] ( h5 ) helices . + + + + + + + + + + + + + to estimate @xmath58 , we reduce the problem of analyzing rotations and their interaction with @xmath0 to an incidence problem in three dimensions , as follows . with each pair @xmath45 , we associate the curve @xmath102 , in a 3-dimensional space parametrized by @xmath103 , which is the locus of all rotations which map @xmath29 to @xmath31 . that is , the equation of @xmath102 is given by @xmath104 putting @xmath105 , @xmath106 , this becomes @xmath107 this is a _ helix _ in @xmath2 , having four degrees of freeedom , which we parametrize by @xmath108 . it extends from the plane @xmath42 to the plane @xmath109 ; its two endpoints lie vertically above each other , and it completes exactly one revolution between them . [ [ h6-helices - rotations - and - incidences . ] ] ( h6 ) helices , rotations , and incidences . + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + let @xmath110 be a set of rotations , represented by points in @xmath2 , as above , and let @xmath111 denote the set of all @xmath112 helices @xmath102 , for @xmath45 ( note that @xmath113 is permitted ) . let @xmath114 denote the number of incidences between @xmath110 and @xmath111 . then we have @xmath115 rotations @xmath28 with @xmath116 are not interesting , because each of them only contributes @xmath117 to the count @xmath114 , and we will mostly ignore them . for the same reason , rotations with @xmath118 are also not interesting for estimating @xmath114 , but they need to be included in the analysis of @xmath119 . unfortunately , as already noted , we do not yet have a good upper bound ( i.e. , cubic in @xmath1 ) on the number of such rotations . [ [ h7-incidences - and - the - second - conjecture . ] ] ( h7 ) incidences and the second conjecture . + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + [ conj2 ] for any @xmath110 and @xmath111 as above , we have @xmath120 suppose that conjecture [ conj2 ] were true . let @xmath121 denote the set of all rotations with multiplicity at least @xmath5 ( with respect to @xmath0 ) . we then have @xmath122 from which we obtain @xmath123 thus establishing conjecture [ conj1 ] , and therefore also the lower bound for @xmath18 ( the number of distinct distances ) derived above from this conjecture . * remark . * conjecture [ conj2 ] can also be formulated for an _ arbitrary _ subset @xmath111 of all possible helices . note that two helices @xmath102 and @xmath124 intersect in at most one point this is the unique rotation which maps @xmath29 to @xmath31 and @xmath125 to @xmath126 ( if it exists at all , namely if @xmath127 ) . hence , combining this fact with a standard cutting - based decomposition technique , similar to what has been noted in @xcite , say , yields the weaker bound @xmath128 which , alas , only yields the much weaker bound @xmath129 , which is completely useless for deriving any lower bound on @xmath18 . ( we will use this bound , though , in section [ sec : conc ] . ) [ [ h8-from - helices - to - parabolas . ] ] ( h8 ) from helices to parabolas . + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + the helices @xmath102 are non - algebraic curves , because of the use of the angle @xmath39 as a parameter . this can be easily remedied , in the following standard manner . assume that @xmath39 ranges from @xmath130 to @xmath131 , and substitute , in the equations ( [ eq : helix ] ) , @xmath132 , @xmath133 , and @xmath134 , to obtain @xmath135 which are the equations of a _ planar parabola _ in the @xmath136-space . ( the parabola degenerates to a line if @xmath137 , a situation that we will rule out by choosing an appropriate generic coordinate frame in the original @xmath138-plane . ) we denote the parabola corresponding to the helix @xmath102 as @xmath139 , and refer to it as an _ @xmath140-parabola_. [ [ h9-joint - and - flat - rotations . ] ] ( h9 ) joint and flat rotations . + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + a rotation @xmath141 is called a _ joint _ of @xmath111 if @xmath28 is incident to at least three helices of @xmath111 whose tangent lines at @xmath28 are non - coplanar . otherwise , still assuming that @xmath28 is incident to at least three helices of @xmath111 , @xmath28 is called _ let @xmath142 be a rotation , incident to three distinct helices @xmath102 , @xmath124 , @xmath143 . from their equations , as given in ( [ eq : helix ] ) , the directions of the tangents to these helices at @xmath28 are @xmath144 put @xmath145 and @xmath146 . then the three tangents are coplanar if and only if @xmath147 simplifying the determinant , and recalling that @xmath148 , the condition is equivalent to @xmath149 in other words , the three helices @xmath102 , @xmath124 , @xmath143 form a joint at @xmath28 if and only if the three points @xmath150 ( and thus also @xmath151 ) are non - collinear . that is , we have shown : [ jointri ] a rotation @xmath28 is a joint of @xmath111 if and only if @xmath28 maps a non - degenerate triangle determined by @xmath0 to another ( congruent and equally oriented ) non - degenerate triangle determined by @xmath0 . a rotation @xmath28 is a flat rotation if and only if @xmath28 maps at least three collinear points of @xmath0 to another collinear triple of points of @xmath0 , but does not map any point of @xmath0 outside the line containing the triple to another point of @xmath0 . * remarks : * * ( 1 ) * note that if @xmath28 is a flat rotation , it maps the entire line containing the three source points to the line containing their images . specifically ( see also below ) , we can respectively parametrize points on these lines as @xmath152 , @xmath153 , for @xmath154 , such that @xmath28 maps @xmath152 to @xmath153 for every @xmath155 . * ( 2 ) * for flat rotations , we also need to ensure , for technical reasons , that the three ( or more ) helices incident to a flat rotation @xmath28 are such that their tangents at @xmath28 are all distinct . this fortunately is always the case . indeed , the preceding analysis is easily seen to imply that if @xmath102 and @xmath124 meet at @xmath28 then their tangents at @xmath28 coincide if and only if @xmath156 . but then @xmath102 and @xmath157 can not have a common point ( rotation ) unless @xmath158 too , i.e. , they are the same helix ; otherwise the common rotation would have to map @xmath29 to the two distinct points @xmath31 and @xmath126 , an impossibility . [ [ h10-special - surfaces . ] ] ( h10 ) special surfaces . + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + in preparation for the forthcoming algebraic analysis , we need the following property of our helices . let @xmath28 be a flat rotation , with multiplicity @xmath4 , and let @xmath159 and @xmath160 be the corresponding lines in the plane , such that there exist @xmath5 points @xmath161 and @xmath5 points @xmath162 , such that @xmath28 maps @xmath163 to @xmath164 for each @xmath165 ( and in particular maps @xmath159 to @xmath160 ) . by definition , @xmath28 is incident to the @xmath5 helices @xmath166 , for @xmath167 . let @xmath168 and @xmath169 denote unit vectors in the direction of @xmath159 and @xmath160 , respectively . clearly , there exist two reference points @xmath170 and @xmath171 , such that for each @xmath165 there is a real number @xmath172 such that @xmath173 and @xmath174 . as a matter of fact , for each real @xmath155 , @xmath28 maps @xmath175 to @xmath176 , so it is incident to @xmath177 . note that @xmath29 and @xmath31 are not uniquely defined : we can take @xmath29 to be any point on @xmath159 , and shift @xmath31 accordingly along @xmath160 . let @xmath178 denote the set of these helices . since a pair of helices can meet in at most one point , all the helices in @xmath178 pass through @xmath28 but are otherwise pairwise disjoint . using the re - parametrization @xmath179 , we denote by @xmath180 the surface which is the union of all the @xmath140-parabolas that are the images of the helices in @xmath178 . we refer to such a surface @xmath181 as a _ special surface_. an important comment is that most of the ongoing analysis also applies when only two helices are incident to @xmath28 ; they suffice to determine the four parameters @xmath182 that define the surface @xmath181 . we also remark that , although we started the definition of @xmath183 with a flat rotation @xmath28 , the definition only depends on the parameters @xmath184 , and @xmath169 ( and even there we have , as just noted , one degree of freedom in choosing @xmath29 and @xmath31 ) . if @xmath28 is not flat it may determine many special surfaces , one for each line that contains two or more points of @xmath0 which @xmath28 maps to other ( also collinear ) points of @xmath0 . also , as we will shortly see , the same surface can be obtained from a different set ( in fact , many such sets ) of parameters @xmath185 , and @xmath186 ( or , alternatively , from different flat rotations @xmath187 ) . an `` intrinsic '' definition of special surfaces will be given shortly . the surface @xmath181 is a cubic algebraic surface , whose equation can be worked out as follows . the equation of the parabola @xmath188 corresponding to @xmath177 is @xmath189 we can view this as a parametrization of @xmath181 using @xmath155 and @xmath190 as parameters . we can simplify these equations as @xmath191 where @xmath192 are quadratic polynomials in @xmath190 . eliminating @xmath155 from these equations gives us the first version of the equation of @xmath181 , which is @xmath193 this is a quartic equation , although it is only linear in @xmath194 and @xmath195 . note also that the cross - section of @xmath181 by any plane @xmath196 is a line , so @xmath181 is a ruled surface . we next reduce ( [ sigma1 ] ) to a cubic equation , as follows . let @xmath197 denote the coordinates of @xmath28 in the @xmath198-frame . we note that @xmath199 . this can be worked out explicitly , or concluded by noting that @xmath197 is a common point of all our parabolas , so @xmath197 can not determine @xmath155 , meaning that the coefficients @xmath200 and @xmath201 in ( [ parsig ] ) must both be zero . hence , each of the three polynomials @xmath202 , @xmath203 , and @xmath204 , appearing in the left - hand side of ( [ sigma1 ] ) , vanishes at @xmath205 , and is therefore divisible by @xmath206 . factoring @xmath206 out , we get a reduced equation for @xmath181 , of the form @xmath207 where @xmath208 and @xmath209 are linear in @xmath190 . recalling that @xmath210 an explicit calculation yields : @xmath211 an additional explicit calculation shows that @xmath212 ( to see , say , the first equality , we need to show that @xmath213 . writing @xmath214 , @xmath215 , where @xmath39 is the angle of rotation , and recalling that @xmath216 , the claim follows by straightforward trigonometric manipulations . ) this allows us to rewrite @xmath217 hence , the `` free '' term in ( [ sigma ] ) is the cubic polynomial @xmath218 @xmath219 @xmath220 we refer to the cubic polynomial in the left - hand side of ( [ sigma ] ) as a _ special polynomial_. thus a special surface is the zero set of a special polynomial . [ [ h11-the - geometry - of - special - surfaces . ] ] ( h11 ) the geometry of special surfaces . + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + special surfaces pose a technical challenge to the analysis . specifically , each special surface @xmath181 captures a certain underlying pattern in the ground set @xmath0 , which may result in many incidences between rotations and @xmath140-parabolas , all contained in @xmath181 . the next step of the analysis studies this pattern in detail . uvuv1.pstex_t consider first a simple instance of this situation , in which two special surfaces @xmath181 , @xmath221 , generated by two distinct flat rotations @xmath28 , @xmath187 , coincide . more precisely , there exist four parameters @xmath182 such that @xmath28 maps the line @xmath222 to the line @xmath223 ( so that points with the same parameter @xmath155 are mapped to one another ) , and four other parameters @xmath224 such that @xmath187 maps ( in a similar manner ) the line @xmath225 to the line @xmath226 , and @xmath227 . denote this common surface by @xmath181 . since the surfaces coincide , the coefficients @xmath228 , @xmath229 for @xmath230 must be proportional to the coefficients @xmath231 , @xmath232 for @xmath233 . that is , we must have @xmath234 and @xmath235 , for some real @xmath236 . in other words , since @xmath238 are unit vectors , the angle bisector between @xmath168 and @xmath169 must coincide with that between @xmath239 and @xmath186 , as depicted in figure [ uvuv1 ] . moreover , as is easily checked , if we let @xmath240 be the intersection point of @xmath241 and @xmath242 , and let @xmath243 be the intersection point of @xmath244 and @xmath245 , then both @xmath28 and @xmath187 map @xmath240 to @xmath243 , and @xmath246 is contained in @xmath181 . ( see figure [ uvuv2 ] . ) indeed , @xmath187 lies on some parabola @xmath247 through @xmath28 which is contained in @xmath181 , and @xmath28 lies on some parabola @xmath248 through @xmath187 which is also contained in @xmath181 . since a pair of distinct @xmath140-parabolas meet in at most one point , the two parabolas must coincide , so @xmath249 and @xmath250 . however , by construction , @xmath251 lies on @xmath241 and @xmath252 lies on @xmath242 , so this common point must be @xmath240 , and , similarly , @xmath253 , as claimed . uvuv2.pstex_t since the preceding analysis applies to any pair of distinct rotations on a common special surface @xmath181 , it follows that we can associate with @xmath181 a common direction @xmath254 and a common shift @xmath255 , so that for each @xmath256 there exist two lines @xmath159 , @xmath160 , where @xmath28 maps @xmath159 to @xmath160 , so that the angle bisector between these lines is in direction @xmath254 , and @xmath28 is the unique rigid motion , obtained by rotating @xmath159 to @xmath160 around their intersection point @xmath257 , and then shifting @xmath160 along itself by a distance whose projection in direction @xmath254 is @xmath255 . the fact that the shifts of any pair of rotations on @xmath181 have the same @xmath254-component follows from the fact that they both map the intersection point @xmath240 of their source lines to the intersection point @xmath243 of their target lines ; consult figure [ uvuv2 ] . let @xmath181 be a special surface , generated by @xmath178 ; that is , @xmath181 is the union of all parabolas of the form @xmath188 , for @xmath154 . let @xmath258 be the common rotation to all these parabolas , so it maps the line @xmath259 to the line @xmath260 , so that every point @xmath175 is mapped to @xmath176 . let @xmath261 be a parabola contained in @xmath181 but not passing through @xmath258 . take any pair of distinct rotations @xmath262 on @xmath261 . then there exist two respective real numbers @xmath263 , such that @xmath264 , for @xmath265 . thus @xmath266 is the unique rotation which maps @xmath125 to @xmath126 and @xmath173 to @xmath174 . in particular , we have @xmath267 . this in turn implies that the triangles @xmath268 and @xmath269 are congruent ; see figure [ uvuv3 ] . uvuv3.pstex_t given @xmath125 , this determines @xmath126 , up to a reflection about @xmath270 . we claim that @xmath126 has to be on the `` other side '' of @xmath270 , namely , be such that the triangles @xmath268 and @xmath269 are oppositely oriented . indeed , if they were equally oriented , then @xmath258 would have mapped @xmath125 to @xmath126 , and then @xmath261 would have passed through @xmath258 , contrary to assumption . now form the two sets @xmath271 the preceding discussion implies that @xmath272 and @xmath273 are congruent and oppositely oriented . to recap , each rotation @xmath256 , incident to @xmath8 parabolas contained in @xmath181 , corresponds to a pair of lines @xmath274 with the above properties , so that @xmath28 maps @xmath5 points of @xmath275 ( rather , of @xmath276 ) to @xmath5 points of @xmath277 ( that is , of @xmath278 ) . if @xmath28 is flat , its entire multiplicity comes from points of @xmath0 on @xmath159 ( these are the points of @xmath276 ) which are mapped by @xmath28 to points of @xmath0 on @xmath160 ( these are points of @xmath278 ) , and all the corresponding parabolas are contained in @xmath181 . if @xmath28 is a joint then , for any other point @xmath279 outside @xmath159 which is mapped by @xmath28 to a point @xmath280 outside @xmath160 , the parabola @xmath247 is not contained in @xmath181 , and crosses it transversally at the unique rotation @xmath28 . note also that any pair of parabolas @xmath281 and @xmath282 which are contained in @xmath181 intersect , necessarily at the unique rotation which maps @xmath283 to @xmath284 and @xmath285 to @xmath286 . this holds because @xmath287 , as follows from the preceding discussion . [ [ special - surfaces - are - anti - rotations . ] ] special surfaces are anti - rotations . + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + let @xmath181 be a special surface , and let @xmath52 be the subsets of @xmath0 associated with @xmath181 , as in ( [ aandb ] ) . then there exists a single _ anti - rotation _ which maps @xmath272 to @xmath273 . conversely , any anti - rotation can be associated with a unique special surface in this manner . however , the number of incidences within a special surface may be larger than the incidence count of the anti - rotation with the appropriate variants of the @xmath140-parabolas : the former counts incidences between the points of @xmath272 ( or of @xmath273 ) and the lines that they determine , while the latter only counts the size of @xmath272 ( or of @xmath273 ) . [ [ an - alternative - analysis . ] ] an alternative analysis . + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + recall the equation ( [ sigma ] ) of @xmath181 @xmath288 where , writing @xmath289 and @xmath290 , @xmath291 now let @xmath139 be a parabola contained in @xmath181 . substituting the equations ( [ parabola ] ) of @xmath139 into the above equation , we get @xmath292 - ( \lambda z + \mu ) \biggl [ ( a_2+b_2)z^2 - 2a_1z + ( b_2-a_2 ) \biggr ] + k(z ) \equiv 0 , \ ] ] where @xmath293 is the `` free '' cubic term in the equation of @xmath181 . a straightforward algebraic simplification of this equation yields @xmath294 + k(z ) \equiv 0 .\ ] ] in particular ( an interesting observation in itself , albeit obvious from the definition of @xmath295 ) , @xmath296 must be divisible by @xmath297 , with the remainder being a linear function of @xmath190 . eliminating this factor , we get @xmath298 for appropriate reals numbers @xmath283 , @xmath285 . now , writing @xmath299 and @xmath300 , where @xmath39 is the angle of rotation , and observing that @xmath301 the containment of @xmath139 in @xmath181 is equivalent to the two conditions @xmath302 for appropriate parameters @xmath303 . the geometric interpretation of the first condition is that the midpoint of @xmath304 has to lie on a fixed line @xmath305 ( whose direction , @xmath306 , is parallel to the angle bisector between the lines @xmath307 ( see figure [ uvuv2 ] ) . the second condition means that @xmath84 has a fixed component in the direction of @xmath305 . in other words , @xmath139 is contained in @xmath181 if and only if @xmath308 , where @xmath309 is the anti - rotation obtained as a reflection about @xmath305 followed by a shift parallel to @xmath305 . this constitutes an alternative derivation of the characterization of @xmath181 given above . [ [ h12-special - surfaces - and - parabolas . ] ] ( h12 ) special surfaces and parabolas . + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + finally , we study intersection patterns involving special surfaces . let @xmath181 be a special surface as above , and let @xmath310 be another @xmath311-linear surface of the form @xmath312 . then either @xmath310 coincides with @xmath181 , or there is at most one parabola contained in both of them . indeed , the intersection of @xmath310 and @xmath181 is the curve satisfying @xmath313 this is a linear system in @xmath194 and @xmath195 . suppose first that its determinant , @xmath314 , does not vanish identically . then , with the exception of finitely many values of @xmath190 , we get a unique solution of the form @xmath315 , @xmath316 , which can describe at most one parabola . if the determinant vanishes identically , then the equation of @xmath310 can be written as @xmath317 , for an appropriate rational algebraic function @xmath318 . if @xmath310 and @xmath181 do intersect in a parabola , then we must have @xmath319 , so @xmath310 and @xmath181 coincide . @xmath98 as a corollary , we have : [ only1 ] let @xmath310 be an @xmath311-linear surface of the above form , and let @xmath28 be a flat rotation contained in @xmath310 . then either @xmath310 contains at least two of the parabolas incident to @xmath28 , and then it must coincide with the corresponding special surface @xmath181 , or @xmath310 contains at most one of these parabolas , so at least two other parabolas cross @xmath310 at @xmath28 . [ sspec ] a special surface can contain at most @xmath1 @xmath140-parabolas . * proof : * let @xmath310 be the given special surface . we claim that for each @xmath320 there can be at most one point @xmath321 such that @xmath322 . indeed , suppose that there exist two such points @xmath323 . since any pair of @xmath140-parabolas on @xmath310 intersect , @xmath324 and @xmath325 meet at a rotation @xmath28 , which maps @xmath29 to both @xmath326 and @xmath327 , an impossibility which completes the proof . @xmath98 [ surfpar ] the number of containments between @xmath328 @xmath140-parabolas and @xmath329 special surfaces is @xmath330 * proof : * as argued above , a special surface @xmath181 is characterized by an anti - rotation @xmath331 in the plane , specified by a line @xmath159 and a shift @xmath255 , such that @xmath332 is the point obtained by reflecting @xmath29 about @xmath159 and then by shifting the reflected point parallel to @xmath159 by distance @xmath255 . thus @xmath181 has three degrees of freedom , and can be parametrized by @xmath333 , where @xmath334 is the equation of @xmath159 and @xmath255 is the shift . we write @xmath335 to denote the special surface parametrized by @xmath336 . by construction , a parabola @xmath139 is contained in @xmath181 if and only if @xmath337 . we use the following parametric setup . we represent each special surface @xmath181 by the corresponding triple @xmath333 , and regard it as a point in parametric 3-space . each parabola @xmath139 is mapped to the locus @xmath338 of all ( points representing ) special surfaces containing @xmath139 . this is a curve in the @xmath333-space , given by the pair of scalar equations @xmath339 . this is a low - degree algebraic curve , whose concrete equations can be worked out explicitly , but we skip over this step . we thus have a system of @xmath329 points and @xmath328 such curves in 3-space , and we wish to bound the number of incidences between them . we have the additional property , noted in lemma [ only1 ] , that two curves meet in at most one point . by projecting these points and curves onto some generic 2-plane , one can easily show that that the number of incidences , and thus the number of original containments , is at most @xmath340 , as claimed . * remark . * if we represent each special surface by its corresponding anti - rotation , lemma [ surfpar ] simply bounds the number of incidences between @xmath329 anti - rotations and @xmath328 ( appropriately transformed copies of ) @xmath140-parabolas , and the bound noted in ( [ weak23 ] ) holds here as well . we begin by reviewing and extending the basic tools from algebraic geometry which have been used in @xcite and in @xcite . however , we develop them here in the context of incidences between points and our @xmath140-parabolas , rather than the context of points and lines considered in the previous papers . so let @xmath341 be a set of @xmath342 @xmath140-parabolas in @xmath2 . for each @xmath343 , we denote the plane containing @xmath344 by @xmath345 and its equation as @xmath346 , where @xmath347 is a linear polynomial . we represent @xmath344 as the intersection curve of @xmath346 and @xmath348 , where @xmath349 is one of the quadratic equations in ( [ parabola ] ) defining @xmath344 , say the first one . note that all the parabolas of @xmath341 cross every plane of the form @xmath196 , each at a single point . recalling the definitions in ( h9 ) , and similar to the case of lines , we say that a point @xmath29 is a _ joint _ of @xmath341 if it is incident to three parabolas of @xmath341 whose tangents at @xmath29 are non - coplanar . let @xmath350 denote the set of joints of @xmath341 . we will also consider points @xmath29 that are incident to three or more parabolas of @xmath341 , so that the tangents to all these parabolas are coplanar , and refer to such points as _ flat _ points of @xmath341 . we recall ( see ( h9 ) ) that any pair of distinct @xmath140-parabolas which meet at a point have there distinct tangents . first , we note that a trivariate polynomial @xmath251 of degree @xmath126 which vanishes at @xmath351 points that lie on a common parabola @xmath343 must vanish identically on @xmath344 . indeed , these points are common roots of @xmath251 and @xmath349 , restricted to the plane @xmath345 . by bzout s theorem @xcite , either these restricted polynomials have a common factor , or they have at most @xmath352 roots . since @xmath349 is irreducible , it must divide the restricted @xmath251 , so @xmath251 must vanish identically on @xmath344 , as claimed . [ [ critical - points - and - parabolas . ] ] critical points and parabolas . + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + a point @xmath29 is _ critical _ ( or _ singular _ ) for a trivariate polynomial @xmath251 if @xmath353 and @xmath354 ; any other point @xmath29 in the zero set of @xmath251 is called _ regular_. a parabola @xmath344 is _ critical _ if all its points are critical . the following proposition is adapted from @xcite . [ factor ] let @xmath355 and @xmath356 be two trivariate polynomials , of respective degrees @xmath5 and @xmath357 , so that there are @xmath358 parabolas of @xmath341 on which both @xmath359 and @xmath360 vanish identically . then @xmath359 and @xmath360 have a common factor . * proof . * assume that both @xmath355 and @xmath356 have a positive degree in @xmath18 ; this can always be enforced by an appropriate rotation of the coordinate frame . it is then an easy exercise to show that @xmath359 and @xmath360 have a common factor if and only if their resultant , when viewing them as polynomials in @xmath18 , is identically @xmath361 . recall that the resultant is a polynomial in @xmath362 and @xmath363 . ( the same holds when @xmath359 and @xmath360 have any number of variables , including @xmath18 , in which case the resultant is a polynomial in the remaining variables . ) for any fixed value @xmath364 of @xmath363 , @xmath365 and @xmath366 have at least @xmath358 common roots ( at the intersection points of the @xmath358 parabolas with @xmath367 ) , so , by bzout s theorem @xcite , they have a common factor . therefore , the resultant , with respect to @xmath18 , of @xmath365 and @xmath366 is identically @xmath361 ( as a polynomial in @xmath362 ) . since this is true for every value @xmath364 of @xmath363 , it follows that the resultant of @xmath355 and @xmath356 , with respect to @xmath18 , vanishes identically as a polynomial in @xmath362 and @xmath363 . therefore , @xmath355 and @xmath356 , as trivariate polynomials , have a common factor . @xmath98 [ prop1 ] let @xmath341 be as above . then any trivariate square - free polynomial @xmath251 of degree @xmath126 can have at most @xmath368 critical parabolas in @xmath341 . * proof : * we prove the claim by induction on the degree @xmath126 of @xmath251 . the claim holds trivially for @xmath369 , so assume that @xmath370 . assume first that @xmath251 is irreducible . apply proposition [ factor ] to @xmath251 and @xmath371 , say . both polynomials vanish identically on each critical parabola , and their respective degrees are @xmath126 and @xmath372 . if @xmath251 had more than @xmath368 critical parabolas then @xmath251 and @xmath371 would have a common factor , which is impossible since @xmath251 is irreducible . suppose next that @xmath251 is reducible ( but square - free ) , and write @xmath373 , so that @xmath359 and @xmath360 are non - constant polynomials which have no common factor ( since @xmath251 is square - free , this can always be done ) . denote the degrees of @xmath359 and @xmath360 by @xmath374 and @xmath375 , respectively ; we have @xmath376 . let @xmath344 be a critical parabola for @xmath251 . then either @xmath377 on @xmath344 or @xmath378 on @xmath344 ( or both ) . moreover , since @xmath379 on @xmath344 , it is easily checked that @xmath344 must satisfy ( at least ) one of the following properties : \(i ) @xmath380 on @xmath344 . \(ii ) @xmath344 is a critical parabola of @xmath359 . \(iii ) @xmath344 is a critical parabola of @xmath360 . indeed , if ( i ) does not hold , we have , without loss of generality , @xmath377 on @xmath344 , but @xmath360 vanishes only at finitely many points of @xmath344 . on any other point @xmath29 of @xmath344 we then must have @xmath381 , which implies that @xmath382 is identically zero on @xmath344 , so @xmath344 is critical for @xmath359 . this implies ( ii ) ; ( iii ) holds in the symmetric case where @xmath378 on @xmath344 but @xmath359 does not vanish identically on @xmath344 . by the induction hypothesis , the number of critical parabolas for @xmath359 is at most @xmath383 , and the number of critical parabolas for @xmath360 is at most @xmath384 . consider the parabolas that satisfy ( i ) and intersect all of them by any of the planes @xmath367 , as in the proof of proposition [ factor ] . all the intersection points are roots of @xmath385 and @xmath386 on this plane , and , as follows from the proof of proposition [ factor ] , these bivariate polynomials have no common factor ( or , more precisely , they can have a common factor only at finitely many values of @xmath363 ) . hence , by bzout s theorem , they have at most @xmath387 common roots . altogether , the number of critical parabolas for @xmath251 is at most @xmath388 @xmath98 [ prop2 ] let @xmath29 be a regular point of @xmath251 , so that @xmath389 on three parabolas of @xmath341 passing through @xmath29 . then these parabolas must have coplanar tangents at @xmath29 . * proof : * any such tangent line must be contained in the tangent plane to @xmath390 at @xmath29 . @xmath98 hence , a point @xmath29 incident to three parabolas of @xmath341 whose tangent lines at @xmath29 are non - coplanar , so that @xmath389 on each of these parabolas , must be a critical point of @xmath251 . [ prop4 ] given a set @xmath0 of @xmath357 points in 3-space , there exists a nontrivial trivariate polynomial @xmath391 which vanishes at all the points of @xmath0 , of degree @xmath126 , for any @xmath126 satisfying @xmath392 . * proof : * ( see @xcite . ) a trivariate polynomial of degree @xmath126 has @xmath393 monomials , and requiring it to vanish at @xmath357 points yields these many homogeneous equations in the coefficients of these monomials . such an underdetermined system always has a nontrivial solution . [ [ flat - points - and - parabolas . ] ] flat points and parabolas . + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + call a regular point @xmath28 of a trivariate polynomial @xmath251 _ geometrically flat _ if it is incident to three distinct parabolas of @xmath341 ( with necessarily coplanar tangent lines at @xmath28 , no pair of which are collinear ) on which @xmath251 vanishes identically . let @xmath28 be a geometrically flat point of @xmath251 , and let @xmath394 be three incident parabolas on which @xmath251 vanishes . let @xmath395 denote the tangent line to @xmath396 at @xmath28 , and let @xmath397 denote a unit vector in the direction of @xmath395 , for @xmath398 . the second - order taylor expansion of @xmath251 at @xmath28 has the form @xmath399 for any vector @xmath254 , where @xmath400 is the _ hessian _ matrix of @xmath251 . @xmath401 is a quadratic polynomial ( in @xmath254 ) which approximates @xmath251 up to third order terms for sufficiently small values of @xmath402 . our goal is to construct , using this approximation and the fact that @xmath389 on three parabolas incident to @xmath28 , as above , a new polynomial , depending on @xmath251 , which vanishes at @xmath28 , and use this vanishing as a characterization of flat points . to do so , we need to make the analysis more specific , and taylor it to the special form of @xmath140-parabolas . let @xmath28 be a flat point , and let @xmath182 be the corresponding parameters in the @xmath138-plane ( so @xmath28 maps @xmath175 to @xmath176 for each @xmath154 ; cf . remark ( 1 ) at the end of ( h9 ) ) . let @xmath180 be the corresponding special surface spanned by the parabolas @xmath188 , for all @xmath155 ( here we vary @xmath155 continuously , but only finitely many corresponding parabolas belong to @xmath341 ) . since @xmath28 is flat , there exist at least three parabolas @xmath403 , @xmath398 ( all belonging to @xmath341 , contained in @xmath181 , and passing through @xmath28 ) , such that @xmath389 on each of them . let @xmath401 denote , as above , the quadratic polynomial which is the second - order taylor expansion of @xmath251 at @xmath28 . let @xmath404 be one of the above parabolas on which @xmath251 vanishes identically . for @xmath187 in the vicinity of @xmath28 , @xmath405 , so , for points @xmath187 near @xmath28 on @xmath344 , we have @xmath406 . let us continue to consider only points @xmath187 on @xmath344 . let @xmath197 ( resp . , @xmath136 ) be the coordinates of @xmath28 ( resp . , @xmath187 ) . the equations of @xmath344 ( see ( [ parabola ] ) ) are @xmath407 so we have @xmath408 which we can further rewrite as @xmath409 let us simplify these equations as @xmath410 where @xmath411 , @xmath412 , @xmath413 , and @xmath414 are all linear functions of @xmath155 . if we substitute these equations into the equation of @xmath401 , assume that @xmath190 is very close to @xmath205 , ignore terms which are at least cubic in @xmath206 , and use the fact that @xmath415 for any @xmath187 on @xmath344 sufficiently close to @xmath28 , we conclude that both the linear and the quadratic parts of @xmath416 ( in @xmath206 ) vanish identically . the linear part is @xmath417 and the quadratic part is @xmath418 hence we have @xmath419 note that both equations vanish for ( at least ) three distinct values of @xmath155 . since the first equation is linear in @xmath155 and the second is quadratic in @xmath155 , all the coefficients of both equations are identically zero . let us restrict ourselves to the coefficient of the linear term in the first equation and of the quadratic term in the second one . denote by @xmath420 ( resp . , @xmath421 ) the coefficient of @xmath155 in @xmath411 ( resp . , @xmath412 ) . then we have @xmath422 it is easily seen that @xmath420 and @xmath421 can not both be zero ( assuming a generic coordinate frame in the original @xmath138-plane ) , so , eliminating them gives @xmath423 which is the constraint we were after . in what follows , we refer to the left - hand side of ( [ sofsof ] ) as @xmath424 . that is , @xmath425 and this polynomial has to vanish at @xmath28 . we have thus shown : [ flat ] let @xmath251 be a trivariate polynomial . if @xmath28 is a regular geometrically flat point of @xmath251 ( with respect to three parabolas of @xmath341 ) then @xmath426 . * remark . * note that the left - hand side of ( [ sofsof ] ) is one of the three polynomials @xmath427 used in @xcite to analyze flat points in a 3-dimensional line arrangement . specifically , @xmath428 where @xmath429 is the unit vector in the @xmath363-direction ; the other two polynomials are defined analogously , using the other two coordinate vectors @xmath430 , @xmath431 . these polynomials form the _ second fundamental form _ of @xmath251 ; see @xcite for details . in particular , if the degree of @xmath251 is @xmath126 then the degree of @xmath424 is at most @xmath432 . in what follows , we call a point @xmath28 _ flat _ for @xmath251 if @xmath426 . we will need the following technical lemma . [ plinxy ] let @xmath251 be an irreducible trivariate polynomial , with the properties that ( i ) @xmath433 at each regular point @xmath28 of @xmath390 , and ( ii ) @xmath389 on at least two distinct intersecting @xmath140-parabolas of @xmath341 . then @xmath251 is a special polynomial . ( note that the converse of the lemma is trivial , because the second - order derivatives @xmath434 , @xmath435 , and @xmath436 are all identically zero for a special polynomial @xmath251 , and because of the way such polynomials are constructed . ) * proof : * fix @xmath437 and consider the restricted bivariate polynomial @xmath438 . clearly , @xmath439 on the plane @xmath440 . hence @xmath441 at each regular point @xmath442 of @xmath390 , and thus at each regular point of @xmath443 . ( note that a regular point of @xmath443 is also a regular point of @xmath251 , although the converse need not be true . ) note also that @xmath443 is an irreducible polynomial , except possibly for finitely many values of @xmath205 . as is well known @xcite , the curvature of the plane curve @xmath444 , at a regular point of @xmath443 , is given by @xmath445 hence this curve has zero curvature at every regular point of @xmath443 , and thus , being the zero set of an irreducible polynomial , it must be a single line . in other words , @xmath251 is linear in @xmath194 and @xmath195 for every fixed @xmath190 , except for finitely many values , implying that its equation is of the form @xmath446 , where @xmath447 , @xmath448 and @xmath449 are univariate polynomials . we now exploit assumption ( ii ) , denoting by @xmath181 the unique special surface determined by ( and containing ) the two given @xmath140-parabolas . the analysis in ( h12 ) then implies that @xmath181 coincides with the zero set of @xmath251 , so @xmath251 is indeed a special polynomial , as claimed . @xmath98 call an @xmath140-parabola @xmath343 _ flat _ for @xmath251 if all the points of @xmath344 are flat points of @xmath251 ( with the possible exception of a discrete subset ) . arguing as in the case of critical points , if @xmath344 contains more than @xmath450 flat points then @xmath344 is a flat parabola . as in @xcite , we next show that , in general , trivariate polynomials do not have too many flat parabolas . as before , we first establish this property for irreducible polynomials , and then extend the analysis to more general polynomials . [ lflat ] let @xmath251 be an irreducible trivariate polynomial of degree @xmath126 , which is not a special polynomial . then @xmath251 can have at most @xmath451 flat @xmath140-parabolas of @xmath341 . * proof : * suppose to the contrary that there are more than @xmath451 flat @xmath140-parabolas . as above , restrict @xmath251 and @xmath424 to a fixed plane @xmath452 of the form @xmath437 . the number of common roots of @xmath251 and @xmath424 on @xmath452 exceeds the product of their degrees . since this holds for every @xmath205 , proposition [ factor ] implies that they must have a common factor . since @xmath251 is irreducible , @xmath251 must be a factor of @xmath424 . this implies that all the ( regular ) points at which @xmath251 vanishes are flat . hence , by lemma [ plinxy ] , @xmath251 must be a special polynomial , a contradiction which completes the proof of the asserted bound . @xmath98 [ lflatx ] let @xmath251 be any trivariate square - free polynomial of degree @xmath126 with no special polynomial factors . then @xmath251 can have at most @xmath453 flat @xmath140-parabolas in @xmath341 . * proof : * if @xmath251 is irreducible , the claim holds by proposition [ lflat ] . otherwise , write @xmath373 where @xmath359 and @xmath360 are non - constant polynomials with no common factors ( and no special polynomial factors ) . let @xmath374 and @xmath375 denote their respective degrees , so @xmath376 . let @xmath28 be a regular flat point of @xmath251 . then either @xmath454 , or only exactly one of @xmath455 , @xmath456 vanishes . hence , if @xmath344 is a flat parabola for @xmath251 then either both @xmath359 and @xmath360 vanish identically on @xmath344 or exactly one of them vanishes identically on @xmath344 , while the other has only finitely many zeroes on @xmath344 . now , as already argued in the proof of proposition [ prop1 ] , there are at most @xmath387 parabolas of the former kind . to handle parabolas of the latter kind , consider a regular point @xmath28 of @xmath251 at which @xmath385 but @xmath360 is nonzero . a simple calculation yields : @xmath457 hence , at @xmath28 we have @xmath458 and therefore we have at @xmath28 , as is easily checked , @xmath459 that is , a regular flat point for @xmath251 , at which @xmath385 but @xmath360 is nonzero , is a regular flat point for @xmath359 , and a symmetric statement holds when @xmath386 but @xmath359 is nonzero . hence , any flat parabola of the latter kind is either a flat parabola for @xmath359 or a flat parabola for @xmath360 . arguing by induction on the degree , the number of flat parabolas for @xmath251 is thus at most @xmath460 and the lemma follows . in this section we extend the recent algebraic machinery of guth and katz @xcite , as further developed by elekes et al . @xcite , using the algebraic tools set forth in the preceding section , to establish the bound @xmath461 on the number of rotations with multiplicity at least @xmath49 in a collection of @xmath328 @xmath140-parabolas . [ thm : gk1 ] let @xmath341 be a set of at most @xmath328 @xmath140-parabolas in @xmath2 , and let @xmath110 be a set of @xmath357 rotations , each of which is incident to at least three parabolas of @xmath341 . suppose further that no special surface contains more than @xmath401 parabolas of @xmath341 . then @xmath462 . * remarks . * * ( 1 ) * the recent results of @xcite imply that the number of joints in a set of @xmath328 @xmath140-parabolas is @xmath463 . the proofs in @xcite are much simpler than the proof given below , but they do not apply to flat points ( rotations ) as does theorem [ thm : gk1 ] . since flat rotations are an integral part of the setup considered in this paper , we need to count them too , using the stronger theorem [ thm : gk1 ] . moreover , even if we were to consider only joint rotations , the analysis of their incidences with the @xmath140-parabolas will turn some of them into flat rotations ( by pruning some of the parabolas ) , so , as in @xcite , we will need to face flat rotations , no matter what . * ( 2 ) * by lemma [ sspec ] , we always have @xmath464 , and we also have @xmath465 , so the `` worst - case '' bound on @xmath357 is @xmath466 . * ( 3 ) * note that the parameter @xmath328 in the statement of the theorem is arbitrary , not necessarily the maximum number @xmath112 . when @xmath328 attains its maximum possible value @xmath112 , the bound becomes @xmath467 . the proof of theorem [ thm : gk1 ] uses the proof technique of @xcite , properly adapted to the present , somewhat more involved context of @xmath140-parabolas and rotations . * we first prove the theorem under the additional assumption that @xmath468 . the proof proceeds by induction on @xmath328 , and shows that @xmath469 , where @xmath272 is a sufficiently large constant whose choice will be dictated by the forthcoming analysis . the statement holds for all @xmath470 , for some constant @xmath471 , if we choose @xmath272 to be sufficiently large . fix @xmath472 , and suppose that the claim holds for all @xmath473 . let @xmath341 and @xmath110 be as in the statement of the theorem , with @xmath474 , and suppose to the contrary that @xmath475 . we first apply the following iterative pruning process to @xmath341 . as long as there exists a parabola @xmath343 incident to fewer than @xmath476 rotations of @xmath110 , for some constant @xmath477 that we will fix later , we remove @xmath344 from @xmath341 , remove its incident rotations from @xmath110 , and repeat this step with respect to the reduced set of rotations . in this process we delete at most @xmath478 rotations . we are thus left with a subset of at least @xmath479 of the original parabolas , each incident to at least @xmath476 surviving rotations , and each surviving rotation is incident to at least three surviving parabolas . for simplicity , continue to denote these sets as @xmath341 and @xmath110 . choose a random sample @xmath480 of parabolas from @xmath341 , by picking each parabola independently with probability @xmath155 , where @xmath155 is a small constant that we will fix later . the expected number of parabolas that we choose is @xmath481 , where @xmath482 is the number of parabolas remaining after the pruning . we have @xmath483 , because each surviving parabola is incident to at least @xmath476 surviving rotations , each incident to at least two other surviving parabolas ; since all these parabolas are distinct ( recall that a pair of parabolas can meet in at most one rotation point ) , we have @xmath484 . hence , using chernoff s bound , as in @xcite ( see , e.g. , @xcite ) , we obtain that , with positive probability , ( a ) @xmath485 . ( b ) each parabola @xmath343 contains at least @xmath486 rotations that lie on parabolas of @xmath480 . ( to see ( b ) , take a parabola @xmath343 and a rotation @xmath487 . note that @xmath28 will be incident to a parabola of @xmath480 with probability at least @xmath155 , so the expected number of rotations in @xmath488 which lie on parabolas of @xmath480 is at least @xmath489 . this , combined with chernoff s bound , implies ( b ) . ) we assume that @xmath480 does indeed satisfy ( a ) and ( b ) , and then ( recalling that @xmath490 ) choose @xmath491 arbitrary rotations on each parabola in @xmath480 , to obtain a set @xmath0 of at most @xmath492 rotations . applying proposition [ prop4 ] , we obtain a nontrivial trivariate polynomial @xmath493 which vanishes at all the rotations of @xmath0 , whose degree is at most the smallest integer @xmath126 satisfying @xmath494 , so @xmath495 for @xmath328 ( i.e. , @xmath471 ) sufficiently large . without loss of generality , we may assume that @xmath251 is square - free by removing repeated factors , we get a square - free polynomial which vanishes on the same set as the original @xmath251 , with the same upper bound on its degree . the polynomial @xmath251 vanishes on @xmath491 points on each parabola in @xmath480 . this number is larger than @xmath352 , if we choose @xmath155 sufficiently small so as to satisfy @xmath496 . hence @xmath251 vanishes identically on all these parabolas . any other parabola of @xmath341 meets at least @xmath486 parabolas of @xmath480 , at distinct points , and we can make this number also larger than @xmath352 , with an appropriate choice of @xmath155 and @xmath125 ( we need to ensure that @xmath497 ) . hence , @xmath251 vanishes identically on each parabola of @xmath341 . we will also later need the property that each parabola of @xmath341 contains at least @xmath498 points of @xmath110 ; that is , we require that @xmath499 , which will hold if @xmath500 . to recap , the preceding paragraphs impose several inequalities on @xmath125 and @xmath155 , and a couple of additional similar inequalities will be imposed later on . all these inequalities are easy to satisfy by choosing @xmath501 to be a sufficiently small positive constant , and @xmath125 a sufficiently large constant . ( these choices will also affect the choice of @xmath272see below . ) we note that @xmath251 can have at most @xmath502 special polynomial factors ( since each of them is a cubic polynomial ) ; i.e. , @xmath251 can vanish identically on at most @xmath502 respective special surfaces @xmath503 , for @xmath504 . we factor out all these special polynomial factors from @xmath251 , and let @xmath443 denote the resulting polynomial , which is a square - free polynomial without any special polynomial factors , of degree at most @xmath126 . consider one of the special surfaces @xmath505 , and let @xmath172 denote the number of parabolas contained in @xmath505 . then any rotation on @xmath505 is either an intersection point of ( at least ) two of these parabolas , or it lies on at most one of them . the number of rotations of the first kind is @xmath506 . any rotation @xmath28 of the second kind is incident to at least one parabola of @xmath341 which crosses @xmath505 transversally at @xmath28 . we note that each @xmath140-parabola @xmath344 can cross @xmath505 in at most three points . indeed , substituting the equations of @xmath344 into the equation @xmath507 of @xmath505 ( see ( [ sigma ] ) ) yields a cubic equation in @xmath190 , with at most three roots . hence , the number of rotations of the second kind is @xmath508 , and the overall number of rotations on @xmath505 is @xmath509 , since we have assumed in the present version of the proof that @xmath510 . summing the bounds over all surfaces @xmath505 , we conclude that altogether they contain @xmath511 rotations , which we bound by @xmath512 , for some absolute constant @xmath31 . we remove all these vanishing special surfaces , together with the rotations and the parabolas which are fully contained in them , and let @xmath513 and @xmath514 denote , respectively , the set of those parabolas of @xmath341 ( rotations of @xmath110 ) which are not contained in any of the vanishing surfaces @xmath505 . note that there are still at least three parabolas of @xmath515 incident to any remaining rotation in @xmath516 , since none of the rotations of @xmath516 lie in any surface @xmath505 , so all parabolas incident to such a rotation are still in @xmath515 . clearly , @xmath443 vanishes identically on every @xmath517 . furthermore , every @xmath518 contains at most @xmath126 points in the surfaces @xmath505 , because , as just argued , it crosses each surface @xmath505 in at most three points . note that this also holds for every parabola @xmath344 in @xmath519 , if we only count intersections of @xmath344 with surfaces @xmath505 which do not fully contain @xmath344 . hence , each @xmath517 contains at least @xmath520 rotations of @xmath516 . since each of these rotations is incident to at least three parabolas in @xmath515 , each of these rotations is either critical or geometrically flat for @xmath443 . consider a parabola @xmath518 . if @xmath344 contains more than @xmath352 critical rotations then @xmath344 is a critical parabola for @xmath443 . by proposition [ prop1 ] , the number of such parabolas is at most @xmath368 . any other parabola @xmath517 contains more than @xmath521 geometrically flat points and hence @xmath344 must be a flat parabola for @xmath443 . by proposition [ lflatx ] , the number of such parabolas is at most @xmath453 . summing up we obtain @xmath522 we require that @xmath523 ; that is , @xmath524 , which can be guaranteed by choosing @xmath155 sufficiently small . we next want to apply the induction hypothesis to @xmath515 , with the parameter @xmath525 ( which dominates the size of @xmath515 ) . for this , we first need to argue that each special surface contains at most @xmath526 parabolas of @xmath515 . indeed , let @xmath310 be a special surface . using ( [ sigma ] ) , eliminate , say , @xmath195 from the equation of @xmath310 and substitute the resulting expression into the equation of @xmath443 , to obtain a bivariate polynomial @xmath527 . let @xmath344 be a parabola of @xmath515 contained in @xmath310 . we represent @xmath344 by its @xmath194-equation of the form @xmath528 , and observe that @xmath527 vanishes on the zero set of @xmath529 . hence @xmath530 must be divisible by @xmath529 . note that , in a generic coordinate frame in the @xmath138-plane , two different parabolas can not have the same equation @xmath528 , because this equation uniquely determines @xmath531 , and @xmath532 , and then , in a generic frame , @xmath327 is also uniquely determined . note also that the degree of @xmath530 is at most @xmath533 , and that the degree of each factor @xmath529 is @xmath50 , implying that @xmath181 can contain at most @xmath534 parabolas of @xmath515 . an important observation , which we will use in the proof of general version of the theorem , is that the argument just given does not use the assumed bound on the number of @xmath140-parabolas contained in a special surface , but , rather , establishes this bound `` from scratch '' for the subproblem involving @xmath516 and @xmath515 . that is , even if the original problem does not satisfy the extra assumption in the restricted version , the subproblems that it generates always do satisfy it . hence , the maximum number of parabolas of @xmath515 contained in a special surface is at most @xmath535 , so , by the induction hypothesis , the number of points in @xmath516 is at most @xmath536 adding up the bounds on the number of points on parabolas removed during the pruning process and on the special surfaces @xmath505 ( which correspond to the special polynomial factors of @xmath251 ) , we obtain @xmath537 with an appropriate , final choice of @xmath155 , @xmath125 , and @xmath272 . this contradicts the assumption that @xmath538 , and thus establishes the induction step for @xmath328 , and , consequently , completes the proof of the restricted version of the theorem . [ [ proof - of - the - general - version ] ] proof of the general version : + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + the proof proceeds almost exactly as the proof of the restricted version , except for the analysis of the number of rotations on the special surfaces @xmath505 . as noted above , we encounter this difference only once , in handling the original problem : when we apply the induction step , we always fall into the restricted setup . by assumption , each special surface @xmath505 contains at most @xmath401 @xmath140-parabolas . we modify the preceding analysis , so that each parabola is considered only once . that is , we iterate over the special surfaces in some order . when handling a surface @xmath505 , we consider only those @xmath140-parabolas that are not contained in any previously processed surface , and bound the number of rotations that they contain . then we remove these parabolas and rotations from further considerations and go to the next surface . as argued above , a special surface @xmath505 containing @xmath172 ( surviving ) parabolas contains at most @xmath539 rotations which lie on these parabolas ( and on no previously processed parabola ) . summing these bounds over all special surfaces , and using the fact that @xmath540 for each @xmath165 , we get an overall bound @xmath541 , as asserted . @xmath98 we summarize the remarks following theorem [ thm : gk1 ] , combined with lemma [ lem : lower ] , in the following corollary . [ roth ] let @xmath0 be a set of @xmath1 points in the plane . then there are at most @xmath3 rotations which map some ( degenerate or non - degenerate ) triangle spanned by @xmath0 to another ( congruent and equally oriented ) such triangle . this bound is tight in the worst case . in the following section we will continue to adapt the analysis of @xcite to obtain bounds on the number of incidences between helices ( @xmath140-parabolas ) and rotations with multiplicity @xmath542 , and , consequently , obtain bounds on @xmath543 , for any @xmath4 . in this section we further adapt the machinery of @xcite to derive an upper bound on the number of incidences between @xmath357 rotations and @xmath328 @xmath140-parabolas in @xmath2 , where each rotation is incident to at least three parabolas ( i.e. , has multiplicity @xmath542 ) . [ inc - gen ] for an underlying ground set @xmath0 of @xmath1 points in the plane , let @xmath341 be a set of at most @xmath342 @xmath140-parabolas defined on @xmath0 , and let @xmath110 be a set of @xmath357 rotations with multiplicity at least @xmath49 ( with respect to @xmath0 ) . then @xmath544 * remark . * as easily checked , the first term dominates the second term when @xmath545 , and the second term dominates when @xmath546 . in particular , the first term dominates when @xmath547 , because we have @xmath548 * proof : * the proof of theorem [ inc - gen ] proceeds in two steps . we first establish a bound which is independent of @xmath357 , and then apply it to obtain the @xmath357-dependent bound asserted in the theorem . for the first step , we have : [ inc-32 ] let @xmath341 be a set of at most @xmath342 @xmath140-parabolas defined on @xmath0 , and let @xmath110 be a set of rotations with multiplicity at least @xmath49 with respect to @xmath0 , such that no special surface contains more than @xmath491 parabolas of @xmath341 . then the number of incidences between @xmath110 and @xmath341 is @xmath463 . * proof . * write @xmath549 for short , and put @xmath550 . we will establish the upper bound @xmath551 , for some sufficiently large absolute constant @xmath273 , whose specific choice will be dictated by the various steps of the proof . suppose then to the contrary that @xmath552 for the given @xmath341 and @xmath110 . for @xmath343 , let @xmath553 denote the number of rotations incident to @xmath344 . we refer to @xmath553 as the _ multiplicity _ of @xmath344 . we have @xmath554 . the average multiplicity of a parabola @xmath344 is @xmath555 . we begin by applying the following pruning process . put @xmath556 . as long as there exists a parabola @xmath343 whose multiplicity is smaller than @xmath557 , we remove @xmath344 from @xmath341 , but do not remove any rotation incident to @xmath344 . we keep repeating this step ( without changing @xmath557 ) , until each of the surviving parabolas has multiplicity at least @xmath557 . moreover , if , during the pruning process , some rotation @xmath28 loses @xmath558 incident parabolas , we remove @xmath28 from @xmath110 . this decreases the multiplicity of some parabolas , and we use the new multiplicities in the test for pruning further parabolas , but we keep using the original threshold @xmath557 . when we delete a parabola @xmath344 , we lose at most @xmath557 incidences with surviving rotations . when a rotation @xmath28 is removed , the number of current incidences with @xmath28 is smaller than or equal to twice the number of incidences with @xmath28 that have already been removed . hence , the total number of incidences that were lost during the pruning process is a most @xmath559 . thus , we are left with a subset @xmath516 of the rotations and with a subset @xmath515 of the parabolas , so that each @xmath517 is incident to at least @xmath560 rotations of @xmath516 , and each rotation @xmath561 is incident to at least three parabolas of @xmath515 ( the latter is an immediate consequence of the rule for pruning a rotation ) . moreover , we have @xmath562 . it therefore suffices to bound @xmath563 . let @xmath564 . since at least three parabolas in @xmath515 are incident to each rotation in @xmath516 , it follows that each parabola in @xmath515 is incident to at most @xmath565 rotations of @xmath516 , and therefore @xmath566 . combining this with the fact that @xmath562 , we get that @xmath567 . we fix the following parameters @xmath568 for an appropriate absolute constant @xmath569 , whose value will be fixed shortly . clearly , @xmath570 , and we can also ensure that @xmath571 , i.e. , that @xmath572 , by choosing @xmath573 . furthermore , since @xmath567 we have @xmath574 . we construct a random sample @xmath575 of parabolas of @xmath515 by choosing each parabola independently at random with probability @xmath155 ; the expected size of @xmath575 is @xmath576 . now take @xmath18 ( arbitrary ) rotations of @xmath516 on each parabola of @xmath575 ( which can always be done since @xmath577 ) , to form a sample @xmath0 of rotations in @xmath516 , of expected size at most @xmath578 . for any parabola @xmath517 , the expected number of rotations of @xmath579 which lie on parabolas of @xmath575 is at least @xmath580 ( each of the at least @xmath557 rotations @xmath581 is incident to at least one other parabola of @xmath515 , and the probability of this parabola to be chosen in @xmath575 is @xmath155 ) . we assume that @xmath273 is large enough so that @xmath582 is larger than @xmath583 ( it suffices to choose @xmath584 ) . since @xmath585 , and the expected size of @xmath586 is @xmath587 , we can use chernoff s bound , to show that there exists a sample @xmath575 such that ( i ) @xmath588 , and ( ii ) each parabola @xmath517 contains at least @xmath589 rotations of @xmath516 which lie on parabolas of @xmath575 . in what follows , we assume that @xmath575 satisfies these properties . in this case , we have @xmath590 . now construct , using proposition [ prop4 ] , a nontrivial suqare - free trivariate polynomial @xmath251 which vanishes on @xmath0 , of smallest degree @xmath126 satisfying @xmath591 , so @xmath592 for @xmath328 sufficiently large ( for small values of @xmath328 we ensure the bound by choosing @xmath273 sufficiently large , as before ) . we will choose @xmath593 , so @xmath594 . as above , and without loss of generality , we may assume that @xmath251 is square - free : factoring out repeated factors only lowers the degree of @xmath251 and does not change its zero set . the following properties hold : ( a ) since @xmath595 , @xmath251 vanishes at more than @xmath352 rotations on each parabola of @xmath575 , and therefore , as already argued , it vanishes identically on each of these parabolas . ( b ) each parabola @xmath517 contains at least @xmath596 rotations which lie on parabolas of @xmath575 . since , as just argued , @xmath251 vanishes at these rotations , it must vanish identically on @xmath344 . thus , @xmath389 on every parabola of @xmath515 . before proceeding , we enforce the inequality @xmath597 which will hold if we choose @xmath255 so that @xmath598 . similarly , an appropriate choice of @xmath255 ( or @xmath273 ) also ensures that @xmath599 . we next consider all the special polynomial factors of @xmath251 , and factor them out , to obtain a square - free polynomial @xmath443 , of degree at most @xmath126 , with no special polynomial factors . as in the previous analysis , @xmath251 can have at most @xmath502 special polynomial factors , so it can vanish identically on at most @xmath502 special surfaces @xmath503 , for @xmath504 . let @xmath600 denote the set of those parabolas of @xmath515 which are not contained in any of the vanishing surfaces @xmath505 . for each parabola @xmath601 , @xmath443 vanishes identically on @xmath344 , and ( as argued above ) at most @xmath126 rotations in @xmath579 lie in the surfaces @xmath505 . hence , @xmath344 contains at least @xmath520 remaining rotations , each of which is either critical or flat for @xmath443 , because each such point is incident to at least three parabolas ( necessarily of @xmath602 ) on which @xmath603 . hence , either at least @xmath352 of these rotations are critical , and then @xmath344 is a critical parabola for @xmath443 , or at least @xmath521 of these rotations are flat , and then @xmath344 is a flat parabola for @xmath443 . applying propositions [ prop1 ] and [ lflatx ] , the overall number of parabolas in @xmath602 is therefore at most @xmath604 on the other hand , by assumption , each vanishing special surface @xmath505 contains at most @xmath491 parabolas of @xmath341 , so the number of parabolas contained in the special vanishing surfaces is at most @xmath605 , with our choice of @xmath255 . hence , the overall number of parabolas in @xmath515 is smaller than @xmath606 , a contradiction that completes the proof of theorem [ inc-32 ] . @xmath98 * proof of theorem [ inc - gen ] . * write @xmath549 for short . set @xmath607 and @xmath608 , for some sufficiently large constant @xmath125 whose value will be determined later , and apply the following pruning process . as long as there exists a parabola @xmath343 whose multiplicity is smaller than @xmath557 , we remove @xmath344 from @xmath341 , but do not remove any rotation incident to @xmath344 . similarly , as long as there exists a rotation @xmath141 whose multiplicity is smaller than @xmath609 , we remove @xmath28 from @xmath110 . of course , these removals may reduce the multiplicity of some surviving rotations or parabolas , making additional rotations and parabolas eligible for removal . we keep repeating this step ( without changing the initial thresholds @xmath557 and @xmath609 ) , until each of the surviving parabolas has multiplicity at least @xmath557 and each of the surviving rotations has multiplicity at least @xmath609 . we may assume that @xmath610 , by choosing @xmath125 suficiently large and using theorem [ thm : gk1](i ) . when we delete a parabola @xmath344 , we lose at most @xmath557 incidences with surviving rotations . when a rotation @xmath28 is removed , we lose at most @xmath609 incidences with surviving parabolas . all in all , we lose at most @xmath611 incidences , and are left with a subset @xmath516 of @xmath110 and with a subset @xmath515 of @xmath341 , so that each parabola of @xmath515 is incident to at least @xmath557 rotations of @xmath516 , and each rotation of @xmath516 is incident to at least @xmath609 parabolas of @xmath515 ( these subsets might be empty ) . put @xmath564 and @xmath612 . we have @xmath613 , so it remains to bound @xmath563 , which we do as follows . we fix some sufficiently small positive parameter @xmath501 , and construct a random sample @xmath614 by choosing each rotation of @xmath516 independently with probability @xmath155 . the expected size of @xmath615 is @xmath616 , and the expected number of points of @xmath615 on any parabola of @xmath515 is at least @xmath617 . chernoff s bound implies that , with positive probability , @xmath618 , and @xmath619 for every @xmath517 . we can therefore assume that @xmath615 satisfies all these inequalities . ( for the bound to apply , @xmath620 ( and @xmath357 ) must be at least some sufficiently large constant ; if this is not the case , we turn the trivial bound @xmath621 ( or @xmath622 ) on @xmath623 into the bound @xmath624 ( or @xmath625 ) by choosing the constant of proportionality sufficiently large . ) construct , using proposition [ prop4 ] , a nontrivial square - free trivariate polynomial @xmath251 which vanishes on @xmath615 , whose degree is at most the smallest integer @xmath126 satisfying @xmath626 , so @xmath627 assuming ( as above ) that @xmath620 is sufficiently large . choosing @xmath125 to be large enough , we may assume that @xmath628 . ( this will hold if we ensure that @xmath629 . ) this implies that @xmath251 vanishes at more than @xmath498 points on each parabola @xmath517 , and therefore it vanishes identically on each of these parabolas . as in the previous analysis , we factor out the special polynomial factors of @xmath251 , obtaining a square - free polynomial @xmath443 , of degree at most @xmath126 , with no special polynomial factors . let @xmath503 denote the special surfaces on which @xmath251 vanishes identically ( the zero sets of the special polynomial factors of @xmath251 ) , for some @xmath504 . let @xmath600 ( resp . , @xmath630 ) denote the set of those parabolas of @xmath515 ( resp . , rotations of @xmath516 ) which are not contained in any of the vanishing surfaces @xmath505 . put @xmath631 and @xmath632 . for each parabola @xmath601 , @xmath443 vanishes identically on @xmath344 , and , as argued in the proof of theorem [ thm : gk1 ] , at most @xmath126 rotations of @xmath579 lie in the surfaces @xmath505 . hence , @xmath344 contains more than @xmath520 rotations of @xmath633 , and , arguing as in the preceding proof , each of these rotations is either critical or flat for @xmath443 . hence , either more than @xmath352 of these rotations are critical , and then @xmath344 is a critical parabola for @xmath443 , or more than @xmath521 of these rotations are flat , and then @xmath344 is a flat parabola for @xmath443 . applying propositions [ prop1 ] and [ lflatx ] , the overall number of parabolas in @xmath602 is therefore at most @xmath634 we now apply theorem [ inc-32 ] to @xmath602 and @xmath633 , with the bound @xmath525 on the size of @xmath602 . the conditions of this theorem hold for these sets : clearly , each rotation in @xmath633 is incident to at least three parabolas of @xmath602 . for the other condition , we argue exactly as in the proof of theorem [ thm : gk1 ] , to conclude that any special surface can contain at most @xmath534 parabolas of @xmath515 , establishing the second condition of theorem [ inc-32 ] . this theorem then implies that the number of incidences between @xmath633 and @xmath602 , which is also equal to the number of incidences between @xmath633 and @xmath515 , is @xmath635 moreover , since each parabola of @xmath602 contains at least eight times more rotations of @xmath633 than of @xmath636 , this bound also applies to the number of incidences between @xmath636 and @xmath602 . it therefore remains to bound the number of incidences between @xmath636 and @xmath637 , namely , between the rotations and parabolas contained in the vanishing special surfaces @xmath505 . to do so , we iterate over the surfaces , say , in the order @xmath503 . for each surface @xmath505 in turn , we process the rotations and parabolas contained in @xmath505 and then remove them from further processing on subsequent surfaces . let us then consider a special surface @xmath505 . let @xmath638 and @xmath639 denote respectively the number of rotations and parabolas contained in @xmath505 , which were not yet removed when processing previous surfaces . the number of incidences between these rotations and parabolas can be bounded by the classical szemerdi - trotter incidence bound @xcite ( see also ( [ weak23 ] ) ) , which is @xmath640 . summing these bounds over all the special surfaces @xmath505 , and using hlder s inequality and the fact , established in lemma [ sspec ] , that @xmath641 , we get an overall bound of @xmath642 @xmath643 where we use the facts that @xmath644 and @xmath645 , which follow since in this analysis each parabola and rotation is processed at most once . the two linear terms satisfy @xmath646 ( the bound obtained in the pruning process ) , and @xmath647 since @xmath648 ; see remark ( 2 ) following theorem [ thm : gk1 ] . we are not done yet , because each rotation of @xmath636 is processed only once , within the first surface @xmath505 containing it . this , however , can be handled as in @xcite . that is , let @xmath28 be a rotation which was processed within the first surface @xmath505 containing it . suppose that @xmath28 also lies on some later surface @xmath649 , with @xmath650 , and let @xmath344 be a parabola contained in @xmath649 , which has not been removed yet ; in particular , @xmath344 is not contained in @xmath505 , and thus meets it transversally , so the incidence between @xmath344 and @xmath28 can be regarded as one of the transversal incidences in @xmath505 , which we have been ignoring so far . to count them , we simply recall that each parabola , whether of @xmath637 or of @xmath602 , has at most three transversal intersections with a surface @xmath505 ( see the proof of theorem [ thm : gk1 ] ) , for a total of at most @xmath126 crossings with all the vanishing surfaces . since each of these parabolas contains at least @xmath498 rotations of @xmath516 , those `` transversal incidences '' are only a fraction of the total number of incidences , and we simply ignore them altogether . to recap , we obtain the following bound on the number of incidences between @xmath516 and @xmath515 : @xmath651 adding the bound @xmath652 on the incidences lost during the pruning process , we get the asserted bound . @xmath98 it is interesting to note that the proof technique also yields the following result . [ mgek ] let @xmath341 be a set of @xmath328 @xmath140-parabolas and @xmath110 a set of points in 3-space which satisfy the conditions of theorem [ inc - gen](i ) . then , for any @xmath653 , the number @xmath654 of points of @xmath110 incident to at least @xmath5 parabolas of @xmath341 satisfies @xmath655 * proof : * write @xmath656 for short . we clearly have @xmath657 . theorem [ inc - gen ] then implies @xmath658 , from which the first two bounds follow . if @xmath659 we use the other bound ( in ( [ weak23 ] ) ) , to obtain @xmath660 , which implies that @xmath661 ( which is in fact an equivalent statement of the classical szemerdi - trotter bound ) . @xmath98 in this section we further improve the bound in theorem [ inc - gen ] ( and corollary [ mgek ] ) using more standard space decomposition techniques . we show : [ thm : impr ] the number of incidences between @xmath357 arbitrary rotations and @xmath328 @xmath140-parabolas , defined for a planar ground set with @xmath1 points , is @xmath662 where the @xmath663 notation hides polylogarithmic factors . in particular , when all @xmath547 @xmath140-parabolas are considered , the bound is @xmath664 * proof : * we dualize the problem as follows . we map each parabola @xmath139 to the point @xmath665 in @xmath666 . each rotation @xmath28 is mapped to a 2-plane @xmath667 , which is the locus of all points @xmath668 such that @xmath28 is incident to @xmath344 . this is indeed a 2-plane , because the equations of @xmath28 , either ( [ eq : helix ] ) in the @xmath103-frame , or ( [ parabola ] ) in the @xmath136-frame , are a pair of linear ( independent ) equations in @xmath108 . so in this new setup we have @xmath328 points and @xmath357 2-planes in 4-space , and we wish to bound the number of incidences between these points and 2-planes . we note that any pair of these 2-planes intersect in at most one point . ( the corresponding statement in the primal setup is that two rotations can be incident to at most one common @xmath140-parabola . ) to bound the number of incidences , we first project the points and 2-planes onto the 3-space @xmath669 . we claim that , with a generic choice of the coordinate frame in the original @xmath138-plane , the projected points remain distinct . indeed , a point @xmath108 , dual to an @xmath140-parabola @xmath139 , is projected to the point @xmath670 , so the projected point uniquely determines @xmath29 , and also @xmath31 , because we may assume that no two points of @xmath0 have the same @xmath18-coordinate @xmath326 . hence the projected points are all distinct . this is not necessarily the case for the 2-planes . indeed , consider a 2-plane @xmath667 . its projection onto the @xmath671-space is the plane satisfying the first equation of ( [ parabola ] ) , say , namely @xmath672 it is easily checked that this equation uniquely determines the @xmath194 and @xmath190 components of @xmath28 , leaving @xmath195 ( i.e. , the shift along the @xmath362-direction that @xmath28 makes after its initial pure rotation ) undetermined . thus it is possible that several distinct rotations , all with the same @xmath194 and @xmath190 components , are projected to the same 2-plane . this has the potential danger that the projection loses incidences , when several 2-planes , incident to a common point @xmath667 , get projected into the same plane , so that , instead of several incidences with @xmath667 in 4-space , we get only one incidence in the projection . nevertheless , this bad situation can not arise . this follows from the easy observation that two distinct rotations with the same @xmath194 and @xmath190 components can not both map a point @xmath673 into the same point @xmath674 . to recap , after the projection we get @xmath328 points and at most @xmath357 planes in @xmath2 , and our goal is to bound the number of incidences between them . more precisely , we want to bound only the number of original incidences . we note that each such incidence appears as an incidence in the projection , but not necessarily the other way around . we recall that , in general , the number of incidences between @xmath328 points and @xmath357 planes in 3-space can be @xmath622 in the worst case , because of the possibility that many points lie on a common line and many planes pass through that line . this situation can also arise in our setup , but we will apply a careful analysis to show that the number of original incidences that project to such a degenerate configuration is much smaller . we proceed as follows . we fix a parameter @xmath675 , to be determined shortly , and construct the following decomposition of 3-space . first , we note that the projected points @xmath670 have only @xmath1 distinct @xmath676-coordinates , which are the @xmath18-coordinates of the points of @xmath0 . similarly , they have only @xmath1 distinct @xmath326-coordinates . we partition the 3-space by a set @xmath677 of @xmath675 planes orthogonal to the @xmath676-axis , so that within each resulting slab the projected points have at most @xmath678 distinct @xmath676-coordinates . we construct a similar collection @xmath679 of @xmath675 planes orthogonal to the @xmath326-axis , so that within each resulting slab the projected points have at most @xmath678 distinct @xmath326-coordinates . we then choose a random sample @xmath680 of @xmath675 of the projected planes . we take the set @xmath681 of @xmath682 planes , construct their arrangement , and decompose each of its cells into simplices . we obtain @xmath683 simplices , and the construction and the standard @xmath684-net theory @xcite imply that , with high probability , the following properties hold for every simplex @xmath685 of the partition : ( i ) @xmath685 is crossed by at most @xmath686 projected 2-planes ; ( ii ) the projected points that fall into @xmath685 have at most @xmath678 distinct @xmath676-coordinates and at most @xmath678 distinct @xmath326-coordinates . further refining the simplices , if necessary , we can also assume that ( iii ) each simplex contains at most @xmath687 projected points . property ( ii ) is crucial . it asserts that the number of points of @xmath0 which induce the parabolas whose dual points project into a fixed simplex is at most @xmath688 ; more precisely , there are only @xmath678 `` source '' points of @xmath0 and only @xmath678 `` target '' points , so that each of these parabolas is of the form @xmath139 , where @xmath29 is one of the @xmath678 source points and @xmath31 is one of the @xmath678 target points . ( note , by the way , that the number of parabolas , @xmath687 , in volved in a subproblem is much smaller than the maximum possible value @xmath689 , when @xmath690 . ) we now apply theorem [ inc - gen ] to each simplex @xmath685 ; that is , to the set @xmath691 of those parabolas whose ( projected ) dual points lie in @xmath685 , and to the set @xmath692 of those rotations whose ( projected ) dual 2-planes cross @xmath685 . put @xmath693 and @xmath694 . we note that some rotations in @xmath692 may be incident to no more than two parabolas in @xmath691 ; these rotations contribute @xmath695 to the overall incidence bound . by theorem [ inc - gen ] we thus have is subsumed by the other terms , because of the possibility that some of the @xmath696 rotations are incident to only one or two parabolas in a subproblem . ] @xmath697 summing these bounds over all cells @xmath685 , we get an overall bound of @xmath698 @xmath699 where , as above , @xmath663 hides polylogarithmic factors . we also have to add to the bound incidences involving points , which are projections dual to parabolas , which lie on the boundaries of the cells of the cutting . let @xmath700 , the projection of a ( unique ) point @xmath701 be such a point . let @xmath359 denote the face whose relative interior contains @xmath401 . if @xmath359 is a 2-face of some simplex @xmath685 , we can associate @xmath401 with @xmath685 : except for the single plane containing @xmath359 , any other plane incident to @xmath401 must cross @xmath685 , and we can count the incidence within the subproblem of @xmath685 . the uncounted incidences , at most one per parabola , add up to at most @xmath328 . if @xmath359 is a vertex ( so @xmath702 ) then any plane through @xmath359 either bounds or crosses some adjacent simplex , so the total number of such incidences is @xmath703 . the harder situation is when @xmath359 is an edge . again , if a plane _ crosses _ @xmath359 at @xmath401 , we can count this incidence within any adjacent simplex , arguing as in the case where @xmath359 is a 2-face . the difficult case is when the plane _ contains _ @xmath359 , and we handle it as follows . it is simpler to consider @xmath359 as a full line of intersection of two sampled planes , rather than a single edge . ( the decomposition , though , has also other edges , obtained in the decomposition of arrangement cells into simplices ; these edges require a slightly different treatment , given below . ) let @xmath704 be the projected dual points that lie on @xmath359 , and let @xmath705 denote the parabola corresponding to @xmath706 , for @xmath707 . consider the rotations @xmath28 whose dual 2-planes project to planes containing @xmath359 . rotations @xmath28 of this kind which are incident to just one of the parabolas @xmath705 are easy to handle , because the number of incidences involving these rotations is at most @xmath357 ( for the fixed line @xmath359 ) , for a total of @xmath708 . consider then those rotations @xmath28 which are incident to at least two of the parabolas @xmath705 . since the points @xmath709 lie on a common line , it follows that the points @xmath163 are also collinear in the original @xmath138-plane , lying on a common line @xmath305 . the points @xmath164 are not necessarily collinear , but they have the property that , for any pair of indices @xmath710 , the ratio @xmath711 is fixed . see figure [ abab ] . abab.pstex_t now if @xmath28 is incident to two parabolas @xmath705 , @xmath712 , then @xmath28 maps @xmath163 to @xmath164 and @xmath713 to @xmath714 . in particular , @xmath715 . this , and the fact that @xmath711 is fixed , imply that @xmath28 maps @xmath305 to the line through @xmath164 and @xmath714 , and that the slope of this line has a _ fixed absolute value _ @xmath716 . hence , considering , with no loss of generality , only lines of the latter kind with positive slope , we can partition @xmath717 into equivalence classes , so that , for each class , all the corresponding points @xmath164 lie on a common line of slope @xmath716 . moreover , there is at most one rotation that is incident to at least two parabolas from the same class ( and no rotation can be incident to two parabolas from different classes ) . thus the total number of incidences of this kind , for the fixed @xmath359 , is at most @xmath155 . summing over all lines @xmath359 , we get a total of @xmath508 such incidences . in the preceding analysis we considered only intersection lines between sampled planes , but , as noted , the cutting has additional edges , interior to cells of the arrangement . we handle such edges in almost the same way as above . that is , we consider such an edge @xmath718 , and argue , exactly as above , that the number of original incidences involving points on @xmath718 and planes that contain @xmath718 is proportional to the number @xmath719 of points on @xmath718 plus the number @xmath720 of planes containing @xmath718 . ( incidences involving planes that cross @xmath718 are also handled exactly as above , wih the same resulting bound . ) the sum @xmath721 is still at most @xmath328 . for the other sum @xmath722 , we note that the number of edges @xmath718 is @xmath683 ( instead of @xmath723 in the preceding analysis ) , but each edge @xmath718 can be contained in at most @xmath686 planes , as follows easily from the @xmath684-net theory ( this holds with high probability , but we may assume that our sample does indeed have this property ) . hence , we have @xmath724 , the same bound as above . altogether , the number of incidences is thus @xmath725 we now choose @xmath726 this choice of @xmath675 makes the first and third terms in the incidence bound equal to each other , and they both dominate the second term , as is easily verified , using the fact that @xmath342 . note also that @xmath727 when @xmath728 assume first that @xmath357 lies in this range . then the incidence bound becomes @xmath729 when @xmath730 , we use @xmath731 and get the bound @xmath732 since @xmath733 , the second term dominates the two other terms , and the bound is thus @xmath734 . finally , when @xmath735 , we use the szemerdi - trotter bound in ( [ weak23 ] ) , which is easily seen to yield the bound @xmath508 . adding all these bounds , the theorem follows . @xmath98 using this bound , we can strengthen corollary [ mgek ] , as follows . [ mgek1 ] let @xmath341 be a set of @xmath328 @xmath140-parabolas and @xmath110 a set of rotations , with respect to a planar ground set @xmath0 of @xmath1 points . then , for any @xmath4 , the number @xmath654 of rotations of @xmath110 incident to at least @xmath5 parabolas of @xmath341 satisfies @xmath736 for @xmath547 , the bound becomes @xmath737 * proof : * the proof is similar to the proof of corollary [ mgek ] , and we omit its routine details . @xmath98 in this paper we have reduced the problem of obtaining a near - linear lower bound for the number of distinct distances in the plane to a problem involving incidences between points and a special class of parabolas ( or helices ) in three dimensions . we have made significant progress in obtaining upper bounds for the number of such incidences , but we are still short of tightening these bounds to meet the conjectures on these bounds made in the introduction . to see how far we still have to go , consider the bound in corollary [ mgek1 ] , for the case @xmath547 , which then becomes @xmath738 . ( here @xmath654 coincides with @xmath58 as defined in ( h3 ) . ) moreover , we also have the szemerdi - trotter bound @xmath739 , which is smaller than the previous bound for @xmath740 . substituting these bounds in the analysis of ( h3 ) and ( h4 ) , we get @xmath62 ^ 2}{x } \le |k| = n_{\ge 2 } + \sum_{k\ge 3 } ( k-1 ) n_{\ge k } = \ ] ] @xmath741 = n_{\ge 2 } + o(s^{29/9 } ) .\ ] ] it is fairly easy to show that @xmath119 is @xmath742 , by noting that @xmath119 can be upper bounded by @xmath743 , where @xmath744 is as defined in ( h1 ) . using the upper bound @xmath745 @xcite , we get @xmath746 thus , at the moment , @xmath119 is the bottleneck in the above bound , and we only get the ( weak ) lower bound @xmath11 on the number of distinct distances . showing that @xmath747 too ( hopefully , a rather modest goal ) would improve the lower bound to @xmath748 , still a rather weak lower bound . \(ii ) it gave us a new , and considerably more involved setup in which the new algebraic technique of guth and katz could be applied . as such , the analysis in this paper might prove useful for obtaining improved incidence bounds for points and other classes of curves in three dimensions . the case of points and circles is an immediate next challenge . another comment is in order . our work can be regarded as a special variant of the complex version of the szemerdi - trotter theorem on point - line incidences @xcite . in the complex plane , the equation of a line ( in complex notation ) is @xmath749 . interpreting this equation as a transformation of the real plane , we get a _ homothetic map _ , i.e. , a rigid motion followed by a scaling . we can therefore rephrase the complex version of the szemerdi - trotter theorem as follows . we are given a set @xmath110 of @xmath357 pairs of points in the ( real ) plane , and a set @xmath750 of @xmath328 homothetic maps , and we seek an upper bound on the number of times a map @xmath751 and a pair @xmath752 `` coincide '' , in the sense that @xmath46 . in our work we only consider `` complex lines '' whose `` slope '' @xmath251 has absolute value @xmath117 ( these are our rotations ) , and the set @xmath110 is simply @xmath753 . \(a ) obtain a cubic upper bound for the number of rotations which map only two points of the given ground planar set @xmath0 to another pair of points of @xmath0 . any upper bound smaller than @xmath754 would already be a significant step towards improving the current lower bound of @xmath17 on distinct distances @xcite . the bulk of the paper was written after the passing away of gyrgy elekes in september 2008 . however , the initial infrastructure , including the transformation of the distinct distances problem to an incidence problem in three dimensions , and many other steps , is due to him . as a matter of fact , it was already discovered by elekes about 10 years ago , and lay dormant since then , mainly because of the lack of effective tools for tackling the incidence problem . these tools became available with the breakthrough result of guth and katz @xcite in december 2008 , and have made this paper possible . thanks are due to mrton elekes , who was a driving force in restarting the research on this problem . n. h. katz and g. tardos , a new entropy inequality for the erds distance problem , in _ towards a theory of geometric graphs _ , j. pach , ed . , _ contemporary math . 342 , amer . soc . press , providence , ri , 2004 , pp . 119126 . a. pressley , _ elementary differential geometry _ , springer undergraduate mathematics series , springer verlag , london , 2001 . r. quilodrn , the joints problem in @xmath755 , arxiv:0906.0555 , posted june 2 , 2009 . Abstract:

Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.

Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered . Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video . Paper: quantum hall effects are characteristic of two - dimensional ( 2d ) electron gases in strong magnetic fields . the integral quantum hall effect ( iqhe ) @xcite is explained in terms of weakly - interacting electrons filling quantized landau levels ( ll ) produced by application of a strong magnetic field perpendicular to the 2d gas @xcite . in contrast , the fractional quantum hall effect ( fqhe ) @xcite can occur only as a result of strong electronic correlations in partially - filled landau levels @xcite . because of its massless chiral charge carriers and atomic - monolayer honeycomb lattice exhibiting sublattice , valley , and spin degeneracies , quantum hall effects in graphene could be much richer than in the semiconductor 2d electron gas , where there is no crystal structure and the only degeneracies are those of the ( non - relativistic ) landau levels and spin . for graphene in strong magnetic fields an integral quantum hall effect @xcite and a fractional quantum hall effect @xcite have been observed , with anomalous filling factors that reflect the unique degeneracies of the graphene electronic structure and the dirac - like nature of its electrons . the valley isospin and spin degrees of freedom imply that graphene in a strong magnetic field is described well by a low - energy hamiltonian that commutes approximately with the generators of an su(4 ) lie algebra . this su(4 ) symmetry allows classification of states in graphene , and can serve as the basis for computing explicit breaking of the su(4 ) symmetry by small non - symmetric terms in the effective hamiltonian . however , there is growing evidence that many states observed in modern experiments can not be described by explicit breaking of su(4 ) . for example , the ground state of graphene in a magnetic field at low temperature exhibits a rapid increase of the longitudinal resistance @xmath0 above a critical magnetic field @xmath1 @xcite . the value of @xmath1 decreases for increasingly cleaner samples , indicating that the resistance is not caused by impurity scattering but instead is intrinsic to the state itself @xcite . in quantum hall systems the currents are carried by edge states , so this insulating ground state must correspond to an emergent state that does not support edge currents produced by _ spontaneous _ ( not explicit ) breaking of the su(4 ) symmetry . thus the approximate su(4 ) symmetry of graphene can suggest possible low - energy collective modes exhibiting spontaneously broken symmetry that are important for the properties of graphene in a magnetic field , but the su(4 ) symmetry alone can not determine which of these modes is the ground state . until now , those broken - symmetry modes have been addressed quantitatively by numerical simulations employing limited numbers of states and particles , or by effective low - energy field - theory approximations . these calculations find various possible low - energy collective states resulting from spontaneous breaking of the su(4 ) symmetry with very similar energies . thus they have been unable to give a definitive answer to the nature of the insulating ground state . let us note that other approaches to the problems addressed here have been proposed ( for example , refs . @xcite ) . however , the present discussion will concentrate on methods based on approximate su(4 ) symmetry of the hamiltonian . an alternative and potentially more powerful application of symmetries has been employed extensively in both nuclear structure and condensed matter physics @xcite . fermion dynamical symmetry method _ truncates the hilbert space to a tractable collective subspace by positing a highest symmetry associated with the physical operators for the system , and constructing effective hamiltonians from polynomials in the casimir invariants of the highest symmetry s subgroup chains . in this approach it is possible not only to classify low - energy collective modes , but to solve analytically for the properties of these modes and to determine which lie lowest in energy , either exactly in particular symmetry limits , or approximately using generalized coherent state methods . in an earlier letter the first application of fermion dynamical symmetry methods to graphene was introduced and applied to determining the ground state in strong magnetic fields @xcite . this paper develops the full dynamical symmetry formalism upon which ref . @xcite rests . it will be shown that the highest symmetry is so(8 ) , with its generators identifiable with particle hole and pairing degrees of freedom that have been discussed previously in the physics of graphene . this symmetry will be shown to be isomorphic to an so(8 ) symmetry used extensively in nuclear structure physics , which permits already - developed mathematics to be appropriated for the graphene problem , and suggests instructive physical analogies between two very different physical systems . a generalized coherent state approximation will be introduced that corresponds to a hartree fock - bogoliubov ( hfb ) formalism subject to so(8 ) symmetry constraints . this permits quantitative evaluation of energy surfaces associated with spontaneously - broken symmetry . the so(8 ) highest symmetry will be shown to have an su(4 ) subgroup that recovers the known physics of su(4 ) quantum hall ferromagnetism as a special case , but implies in the more general case new low - energy physics that transcends su(4 ) quantum hall ferromagnetism . hence , a solvable and physically - illuminating approach to the rich low - energy structure of undoped graphene in strong magnetic fields will be proposed that reproduces known physics , but also suggests testable new physics in this complex system . comprehensive reviews of graphene physics may be found in refs . the presentation here will recall only a select set of features that will be relevant for subsequent discussion . undoped graphene is a 2-dimensional semiconductor with zero bandgap . it has a bipartite honeycomb lattice structure illustrated in fig . [ fig : a - b_sublattices ] that corresponds to two interlocking triangular sublattices , labeled a and b. the two - fold degree of freedom specifying whether an electron is on the a sublattice or b sublattice is a spin - like quantum number termed the _ sublattice pseudospin_. the sublattice pseudospin behaves mathematically like the actual spin of the electron ( which will be introduced later ) , but it is a separate degree of freedom . the dispersion of energy with momentum for undoped graphene in the absence of a magnetic field is illustrated in fig . [ fig : dispersiongraphene ] . 0pt 0.44 electronic dispersion of graphene calculated in a tight - binding model with no magnetic field . two inequivalent points in the brillouin zone are labeled @xmath2 and @xmath3 . near these k - points the dispersion becomes linear , leading to _ dirac cones , _ as shown in the expanded view . for undoped graphene the fermi surface lies at the apex of the cones , where the level density vanishes and the effective electronic mass tends to zero . thus low - energy electrons are governed approximately by a dirac equation for massless electrons . the two inequivalent points @xmath2 and @xmath3 are not connected by reciprocal lattice vectors . the corresponding two - fold k degree of freedom may be viewed mathematically as a 2-valued spin - like quantity , commonly termed the _ valley isospin _ because of the valley - like structure in the dispersion of fig . [ fig : dispersiongraphene ] around the k - points . for brevity the valley isospin will sometimes be termed simply _ isospin . _ obviously this two - fold `` isospin '' degree of freedom is a pseudospin that should be distinguished physically from the actual spin of the electron , and from standard usage of isospin quantum numbers in nuclear and particle physics . near the _ dirac cones _ ( inset to fig . [ fig : dispersiongraphene ] ) the dispersion is linear , the density of electronic states tends to zero , and the electrons are described by a massless dirac equation in which the fermi velocity plays the role that the speed of light would play in an actual relativistic system . thus the low - energy electrons for undoped graphene in zero magnetic field behave to good approximation as _ massless chiral fermions , _ with the chirality representing the projection of the sublattice pseudospin on the direction of motion , not the projection of the actual spin . the vanishing of the density of states at the dirac point ( fermi surface ) implies that the transport properties of graphene are different from either a metal or a semiconductor . our interest will be primarily low - energy states in a strong magnetic field . for non - interacting electrons , the quantized levels may be found by solving the dirac equation for massless fermions with a vector potential appropriate to the applied magnetic field . the dispersion of energy with magnetic field strength for massless dirac electrons is illustrated in fig . [ fig : llgraphene_n0](a ) . consider the @xmath4 state , which corresponds to half filling of the fourfold - degenerate @xmath5 ll in graphene , as illustrated in fig . [ fig : llgraphene_n0](b ) . the graphene honeycomb lattice is bipartite , as illustrated in fig . [ fig : a - b_sublattices ] . the @xmath5 ll is located exactly at the dirac point corresponding to @xmath6 . for low - energy excitations in each valley labeled by @xmath2 or @xmath3 , the inter - valley tunneling may be ignored and the electrons in the valley reside entirely on either the a or b sublattice . hence , for the @xmath5 ll labeling with the valley isospin ( indicating whether the electron is in a @xmath2 or @xmath3 valley ) is equivalent to labeling with the sublattice pseudospin ( indicating whether the electron is on the a or b sublattice ) . this is reminiscent of a nel state with spins on two different sublattices , with a nel order defined by the difference in spins on the a and b sublattices . a quantum hall effect is signaled by a plateau in the hall conductance @xmath7 having quantized values @xmath8 where the _ filling factor _ @xmath9 is defined by @xmath10 with @xmath11 the charge - carrier density , @xmath12 the magnetic field strength , and @xmath13 the magnetic flux density in units of the fundamental flux quantum @xmath14 . these plateaus indicate formation of an _ incompressible quantum liquid . _ this is a compact way to say that the ground state is separated from excited states by an _ energy gap , _ which inhibits compression because of the energy required for excitation across the gap . the integral quantum hall effect ( iqhe ) in graphene is similar to the integral quantum hall effect for non - relativistic electrons in that it corresponds to the formation of incompressible states resulting from the complete filling of landau levels by weakly - interacting electrons . however , there are two important differences between the iqhe states observed in graphene and those observed in conventional 2d semiconductor heterostructures : ( 1 ) in addition to the two - fold spin degeneracy ( in the absence of zeeman splitting ) , there is a two - fold valley degeneracy associated with the distinct @xmath2 and @xmath15 points in the first brillouin zone . thus the filling factor changes in steps of four between plateaus in the hall resistance for graphene . ( 2 ) for graphene the filling factor @xmath9 defined in eq . ( [ iqhegraph1.1 ] ) vanishes at the dirac point for particle hole symmetric half filling of the graphene lattice , since the electron density @xmath11 tends to zero there . hence , in the absence of a zeeman effect or strong electronic correlations , there is no integral quantum hall effect in graphene for @xmath16 . ( a ) relativistic dispersion for massless dirac electrons as a function of magnetic field strength @xmath12 . states are labeled by a principle quantum number @xmath17 and a quantum number @xmath18 indicating particle - like ( @xmath19 ) and hole - like ( @xmath20 ) states . each landau level labeled by @xmath17 has a high orbital degeneracy @xmath21 ( see eq . ( [ degen1.1 ] ) ) , and an additional 4-fold degeneracy associated with spin and valley isospin . ( b ) one configuration for occupation of the @xmath5 landau level in monolayer graphene . the splitting and occupation are schematic only . the ground state would be a superposition of such configurations and in the su(4 ) symmetry limit ( which obtains for coulomb - only interactions ) the 4 levels shown labeled by valley @xmath2 or @xmath3 and spin up or down would be degenerate . in realistic cases the splitting often is small , suggesting approximate su(4 ) symmetry . ] in graphene the analog of the integral quantum hall effect was first observed at filling factors @xmath22 by sweeping the field or the carrier density through the landau levels @xcite . this implies hall resistance quantization for filling factors in the sequence @xmath23 where @xmath11 is the charge carrier density and @xmath17 is the landau level index @xcite . this sequence is quite different from the integral quantum hall effect sequence observed in other 2d electron gases . however , it likely results from the same basic physics as the normal iqhe , modified by the 4-fold spin valley degeneracies of non - interacting , massless dirac electrons . the period @xmath24 in eq . ( [ iqhegraph1.2 ] ) is is a consequence of the approximate four - fold degeneracy of the graphene landau level , and the added @xmath25 ( which is not present in non - relativistic 2d systems ) is a berry phase effect that results from the special status of the @xmath5 state for massless dirac fermions : a quantum phase arises at the band degeneracy point associated with precession of the pseudospinor describing the 2-fold sublattice degree of freedom , which modifies the quantization condition for electronic orbits @xcite . the four - fold near - degeneracy of the landau level follows because the zeeman energy is small compared with the interaction energy , and the pseudospin degree of freedom representing the two inequivalent dirac cones at the corners of the brillouin zone ( k and k@xmath26 ) does not couple to external fields if the two sublattices are equivalent . because of the dirac - cone dispersion with the fermi level located at the apex of the cones ( see fig . [ fig : dispersiongraphene ] ) , low - energy excitations in graphene occur in regions of reduced electron density , which disfavors electron correlations . but by placing a strong perpendicular magnetic field on the system the resulting landau quantization ( corresponding semiclassically to requiring that an integral number of debroglie wavelengths wrap around a cyclotron orbit , and implying that an integral number of magnetic flux quanta pass through the area bounded by the orbit ) leads to a bunching of levels into regions of locally high degeneracy separated by gaps . these regions of locally high level density may exhibit conditions more favorable for the development of strong correlations between electrons . landau levels ( ll ) become strongly correlated when inter - ll excitations are of sufficiently high energy that they may be neglected and the low - energy excitations involve only intra - ll transitions . then the kinetic energy of the ll is a constant that can be omitted . this limit of strong electronic correlations has two important physical implications : ( 1 ) the approximate 4-fold spin valley degeneracy of the graphene landau levels leads to quantum hall ferromagnetic states that will be discussed further below . ( 2 ) the strong correlations can produce incompressible states at partial filling of the ll that are reminiscent of the fractional quantum hall effect ( fqhe ) in semiconductor devices . after the discovery of the integral quantum hall effect in graphene , experiments performed at higher magnetic field strengths observed fragile quantum hall states at filling factors @xmath27 . the @xmath28 states are thought to be the result of single - particle zeeman splitting of the landau levels but the states at filling factors @xmath29 are thought to be caused by electron electron interactions breaking degeneracies of the @xmath5 landau level @xcite . quantum hall incompressible states having actual fractional filling were later observed at filling factors such as @xmath30 @xcite . the fractional states follow the standard composite fermion model @xcite sequence for filling factors @xmath31 , but only even - numerator fractions are seen for @xmath32 . these sequences , and the energy gaps for the corresponding incompressible states , are thought to reflect the interplay of strongly - correlated chiral electrons and the characteristic internal symmetries of graphene that will be discussed further below @xcite . as has been seen , in the quantum hall effect for 2d electron gases produced in semiconductor devices , two fundamental classes of incompressible states are found : 1 . those where the requisite gaps are produced by complete filling of landau levels ( fermi energy lying between landau levels ) that are explained by weakly - interacting electrons subject to impurity - scattering localization . 2 . those where the gaps are produced by strong electron correlations within a partially - filled landau level . for the normal semiconductor quantum hall effect , the first case is commonly termed the integral quantum hall effect ( iqhe ) , because it leads uniquely to quantum hall plateaus at integral filling factors , and the second case is termed the fractional quantum hall effect ( fqhe ) , because it is characterized uniquely by quantum hall plateaus at fractional values of the filling factor . in graphene , the anomalous counting implied by the four - fold spin valley degeneracy for massless chiral fermions modifies this correspondence . one may again assume incompressible states divided into those that have gaps produced by weakly - interacting electrons filling landau levels completely and those that have gaps produced by correlations within a partially filled level . however ( 1 ) states of the first class occur at integral fillings but the integers of eq . ( [ iqhegraph1.2 ] ) are not those of the normal iqhe because of the anomalous counting implied by graphene s internal structure . ( 2 ) states of the second class may have either integral or fractional filling factors because of the anomalous counting . thus iqhe and fqhe may be used as shorthand labels in graphene , but it should be understood that what is meant by `` iqhe '' in graphene is the formation of incompressible states by weakly - interacting electrons completely filling landau levels , and by `` fqhe '' the formation of incompressible states by strongly - correlated electrons in a partially - filled level , irrespective of whether the observed filling factors are integers or rational fractions . our primary interest in this paper lies in those incompressible states formed by electron electron and electron lattice correlations in partially - filled landau levels , and thus in graphene `` fqhe '' states . in the normal two - dimensional electron gas produced in semiconductor devices the landau levels can contain @xmath33 states , where @xmath34 is the electronic charge and @xmath12 is the magnetic field . as has been seen , in graphene there is an additional 4-fold degeneracy associated with the spin and valley degrees of freedom . it is common to unite these four degrees of freedom in terms of an su(4 ) symmetry that is termed _ quantum hall ferromagnetism ( qhfm ) . _ su(4 ) symmetry for graphene in a strong magnetic field is expected when all four spin and valley levels are degenerate . two conditions must be satisfied for this condition to be fulfilled . 1 . landau - level mixing caused by inter - ll electronic transitions must be negligible . perturbations within a single ll that break the 4-fold spin isospin symmetry must be small . the resulting theory predicts quantum hall states that have no analog in semiconductor heterostructures . let us study these states by introducing an effective low - energy hamiltonian exhibiting approximate su(4 ) symmetry . the two - dimensional electronic spin degree of freedom and the two - dimensional electronic valley ( k ) degree of freedom are most elegantly expressed in terms of independent spin and valley isospin states . for the spin , introduce the pauli matrix vector @xmath35 , with the standard representation in terms of the @xmath36 matrices @xmath37 which obey the su(2 ) lie algebra @xmath38 } = i\epsilon_{ijk } \frac{\sigma_k}{2 } , \label{su2comm}\ ] ] where @xmath39 is the completely antisymmetric 3rd - rank tensor . the matrices ( [ algebra1.5 ] ) are assumed to operate on a spinor basis of spin - up and spin - down electrons @xmath40 a set of equations in the valley isospin space completely analogous to eqs . ( [ algebra1.5])([algebra1.6 ] ) for the spin space results if one defines the su(2 ) pauli - matrix representation for the valley isospin operators @xmath41 , @xmath42 which operate on the valley isospinor basis @xmath43 the operators @xmath44 and @xmath45 may now be used to define an effective low - energy hamiltonian having landau - level and internal spin and valley isospin degrees of freedom . the two largest energy scales for graphene in a strong magnetic field are the landau - level separation and the coulomb energy . at the charge neutral point ( fermi energy for undoped graphene ) the ll separation is approximately three times larger than the coulomb energy , which is in turn considerably larger than any additional terms in the interaction . therefore , a strategy is adopted here of ignoring excitations between landau levels and projecting onto the @xmath5 ll . at a quantitative level the landau level mixing can not be ignored ( see the discussion in ref . @xcite ) , but such an approximation gives the correct qualitative physics and the effect of excluded landau levels can be included to some degree by parameter renormalization , which will be sufficient for our purposes . within this single landau level the hamiltonian is assumed to be dominated by a long - range coulomb interaction that is su(4 ) symmetric , with shorter - range interactions in spin and valley degrees of freedom ( originating in both screened electron electron interactions and electron phonon interactions ) causing su(4 ) symmetry breaking . to implement this a graphene hamiltonian projected onto the @xmath5 landau level is adopted that was proposed in ref . @xcite and employed further in ref . @xcite,@xmath46 where the valley - independent coulomb interaction @xmath47 may be expressed as @xmath48 @xmath49 is the short - range , valley - dependent interaction , @xmath50 \delta(\bm r_i - \bm r_j ) , \label{so5_1.1c}\ ] ] where the pauli matrices @xmath51 operate on the valley isospin and @xmath52 and @xmath53 are coupling constants , and the zeeman energy @xmath54 is given by @xmath55 where @xmath56 is the bohr magneton , @xmath12 is the magnetic field strength , the pauli matrices @xmath57 operate on the electronic spin degrees of freedom , and the @xmath58 direction for the spin space is chosen to be aligned with @xmath12 . letting @xmath59 and @xmath60 , the set of 15 operators @xmath61 [ algebra1.4 ] is closed under commutation , defining an su(4 ) lie algebra that commutes with the coulomb interaction @xmath47 @xcite . thus , if @xmath49 and @xmath54 are small compared with @xmath47 in eq . ( [ so5_1.1a ] ) , the hamiltonian will have an approximate su(4 ) invariance . the operator @xmath62 represents the total spin and the operator @xmath63 represents the total valley pseudospin . in the @xmath5 landau level for graphene there is an equivalence between valley and sublattice degrees of freedom , so @xmath64 can be viewed as a nel vector in the @xmath5 landau level measuring the difference in spins on the a and b sublattices . the operators @xmath65 coupling spin and valley isospin will be discussed further below . the occurrence of su(4 ) symmetry and its explicit symmetry - breaking pattern depend on the values of the effective coupling parameters @xmath52 and @xmath53 . for the lattice spacings found in graphene , each can be estimated to be considerably smaller than the su(4)-symmetric coulomb term , so one may expect su(4 ) to be broken only weakly by explicit terms in realistic systems . four basic explicit symmetry - breaking patterns have been identified @xcite : 1 . for arbitrary non - zero values of @xmath52 and @xmath53 , the symmetry is broken to @xmath66 where @xmath67 is associated with global conservation of spin and @xmath68 with conservation of its @xmath58 component , and @xmath69 is associated with conservation of the @xmath70 component of the valley isospin . ( conservation of @xmath70 implies physically that the difference in electronic densities between the @xmath2 and @xmath3 sites is invariant , which might be expected to be true for low - energy states having minimal scattering between valleys . ) in the absence of zeeman splitting spin is conserved , but only the @xmath58 component of the valley isospin is conserved . the full hamiltonian ( [ so5_1.1a ] ) including the zeeman term conserves only the @xmath58 components of the spin and valley isospin . if @xmath71 but @xmath72 , the symmetry is broken to @xmath73 in the absence of zeeman splitting this corresponds to conserving independent spin rotations for the wavefunction in each valley labeled by @xmath2 and @xmath3 , but breaking of the valley isospin to u(1)@xmath74 . the full hamiltonian ( [ so5_1.1a ] ) including the zeeman term conserves only the @xmath58 components of the spin in each valley separately , and the @xmath58 component of the valley isospin . 3 . if @xmath75 , the symmetry is broken to @xmath76 corresponding to full spin and valley isospin rotational symmetry in the absence of zeeman splitting . the complete hamiltonian ( [ so5_1.1a ] ) including the zeeman term conserves the su(2 ) isospin symmetry but only the @xmath58 component of the spin . 4 . if @xmath77 , the hamiltonian commutes with @xmath65 , @xmath62 , and @xmath70 , and these 10 operators generate the lie group so(5 ) , so @xcite @xmath78 where the @xmath79 symmetry is generated by @xmath80 . thus , in the absence of zeeman splitting the system exhibits an so(5 ) symmetry involving both spin and valley isospin . the full hamiltonian ( [ so5_1.1a ] ) including the zeeman term conserves the @xmath58 component of spin and the @xmath79 symmetry . the so(5 ) subgroup plays the role of a transitional symmetry connecting the nel - like states associated with @xmath81 and the states associated with valley degrees of freedom @xmath82 and @xmath83 . the subgroup structure for these four patterns of explicit su(4 ) symmetry breaking is illustrated in fig . [ fig : dynamicalchains_qhf].dynamicalchains_qhf figures / dynamicalchains_qhf_vert_compact_nobkg.eps 0pt 0.40 explicit symmetry - breaking structure for su(4 ) quantum hall ferromagnetism described by the hamiltonian ( [ so5_1.1a ] ) . these symmetries and explicitly - broken symmetries have proven extremely useful in understanding the states of graphene in a strong magnetic field @xcite . let us now consider using symmetries in an even more powerful way than that discussed in the preceding section . specifically , let us attempt to describe the quantum hall ferromagnetic behavior of graphene using _ fermion dynamical symmetries _ of an effective hamiltonian operating in a highly - truncated collective subspace . this has the potential to prescribe dynamics as well as taxonomy and conservation laws , within a many - body model having analytical solutions that illuminate the physics of quantum hall states in graphene . for clarity of discussion a valence space will be assumed corresponding to a single landau level . to avoid cluttered notation the index @xmath17 labeling the landau level is suppressed and the fermion creation operator @xmath84 and the corresponding hermitian conjugate @xmath85 are introduced . the index @xmath86 takes one of two values ( @xmath87 ) labeling the valley isospin projections corresponding to valleys @xmath2 or @xmath3 , the electron spin polarization @xmath88 takes one of two values ( @xmath89 ) labeling spin - up or spin - down , and @xmath90 is a quantum number distinguishing degenerate states within a given landau level ( typically an angular momentum in symmetric gauge or a linear momentum in landau gauge ) . the fermionic operators @xmath91 and @xmath92 are assumed to obey @xmath93 where @xmath94 . by virtue of this anticommutator , the @xmath95 create a fermion in the state labeled by @xmath96 , the @xmath97 annihilate a fermion in the same state , and @xmath98 counts the number of fermions in the state labeled by @xmath96 . the four states representing possible combinations of @xmath86 and @xmath88 are displayed in table [ tb : quantumnumbermapping ] , ccccc ' '' '' valley & @xmath86 & @xmath88 & @xmath99 & @xmath100 + ' '' '' @xmath2 & @xmath19 & @xmath101 & @xmath102 & @xmath103 + [ ] @xmath2 & @xmath19 & @xmath104 & @xmath105 & @xmath106 + [ ] @xmath3 & @xmath20 & @xmath101 & @xmath107 & @xmath108 + [ ] @xmath3 & @xmath20 & @xmath104 & @xmath109 & @xmath110 + and correspond physically to the four possible combinations of the electron being in either the @xmath2 or @xmath3 valley with either spin up or spin down ( see fig . [ fig : llgraphene_n0]b ) . for brevity the label @xmath111 displayed in the last column of the table will often be used to distinguish these states . the four basis states labeled by @xmath100 are illustrated graphically in fig . [ fig : graphenebasis ] . figures / graphenebasis.eps 0pt 0.16 the four isospin spin basis vectors @xmath112 of table [ tb : quantumnumbermapping ] . table [ tb : quantumnumbermapping ] also displays a unique mapping of these four states to a label @xmath99 that takes the four possible projection quantum numbers @xmath113 of a fictitious angular momentum @xmath114 ; the motivation for this mapping will become apparent later . let us now introduce an operator @xmath115 that creates a pair of electrons , one in the @xmath116 level and one in the @xmath117 level , with the total @xmath90 of each pair coupled to zero term by term , @xmath118 and its hermitian conjugate @xmath119 , which annihilates a corresponding electron pair . each index @xmath100 or @xmath120 ranges over four values , implying 16 components in eq . ( [ algebra1.1 ] ) . however , the pair wavefunction must satisfy the pauli principle which , upon expanding the indices @xmath100 and @xmath120 using table [ tb : quantumnumbermapping ] , eliminates the four diagonal @xmath121 possibilities . furthermore , because of the antisymmetry requirement the pair creation operators are constrained by @xmath122 implying that only half of the remaining 12 operators @xmath123 are independent . thus eq . ( [ algebra1.1 ] ) defines six independent operators @xmath123 , with six independent hermitian conjugates @xmath124 . let us introduce in addition to these pairing operators the 16 particle hole operators @xmath125 through @xmath126 where @xmath127 is the kronecker delta and @xmath128 is the total degeneracy the single landau level ( see eq . ( [ degen1.2 ] ) ) . the commutators for the 28 operators @xmath124 , @xmath123 , and @xmath12 are found to be @xcite @xmath129 } & = -b_{db } \delta_{ac } - b_{ca}\delta_{bd } + b_{cb } \delta_{ad } + b_{da } \delta_{bc } \label{algebra1.3a } \\ { \left[b_{ab } , b_{cd}\right ] } & = \delta_{bc } b_{ad } - \delta_{ad}b_{cb } \label{algebra1.3b } \\ { \left[b_{ab } , a^\dagger_{cd}\right ] } & = \delta_{bc } a^\dagger_{ad } + \delta_{bd } a^\dagger_{ca } \label{algebra1.3c } \\ { \left[b_{ab } , a_{cd}\right ] } & = -\delta_{ac } a_{bd } - \delta_{ad } a _ { cb } , \label{algebra1.3d}\end{aligned}\ ] ] [ algebra1.3 ] which is isomorphic to an so(8 ) lie algebra . thus , the 28 members of the operator set @xmath130 exhibit so(8 ) symmetry under commutation . the ultimate justification for introducing this so(8 ) lie algebra will lie in the results to which it will lead . however , a general discussion of why the known physics of graphene suggests the efficacy of such an algebra in understanding the possible collective modes of the system may be found in appendix [ h : appendixa ] . the su(4 ) generators ( [ algebra1.4 ] ) may be expressed in terms of the operators ( [ algebra1.2 ] ) by employing eqs . ( [ algebra1.5])([algebra1.7e ] ) in eq . ( [ algebra1.4 ] ) and utilizing the equivalences in table [ tb : quantumnumbermapping ] to expand the indices for @xmath125 from eq . ( [ algebra1.2 ] ) . for example , consider the spin operator @xmath131 . from eq . ( [ algebra1.4a ] ) one may write @xmath132 & \left . \qquad\qquad\qquad -i c^\dagger_{-\uparrow m_k } c_{-\downarrow m_k}{^{\vphantom{\dagger}}}+ i c^\dagger_{-\downarrow m_k } c_{-\uparrow m_k}{^{\vphantom{\dagger}}}\right ) \\ & = -ib_{12 } + i b_{21 } -i b_{34 } + i b_{43}.\end{aligned}\ ] ] by such methods one finds that the spin operators ( [ algebra1.4a ] ) may be expressed in terms of the @xmath125 generators of so(8 ) as @xmath133 [ algebra1.8 ] the valley isospin operators ( [ algebra1.4b ] ) as @xmath134 [ algebra1.9 ] the nel vector of eq . ( [ algebra1.4c ] ) as @xmath135 [ algebra1.10 ] and the operators @xmath65 of eq . ( [ algebra1.4d ] ) as @xmath136 [ algebra1.11 ] the inverse transformations expressing the @xmath125 in terms of the @xmath137 are given in appendix [ h : appendixb ] . hence the su(4 ) algebra generated by the operators in eq . ( [ algebra1.4 ] ) is a subalgebra of the so(8 ) algebra , with its generators corresponding to particular linear combinations of the subset of so(8 ) generators defined by the particle hole operators @xmath125 in eq . ( [ algebra1.2 ] ) . in fact , the present formalism also could be constructed by starting with the su(4 ) algebra generated by the @xmath125 operators and expanding that to the so(8 ) algebra of eq . ( [ algebra1.3 ] ) by adding pairing operators , using the motivation discussed in appendix [ h : appendixa ] . one wishes to investigate possible collective modes for graphene electrons undergoing strong correlations within a single landau level . pairs of fermions often afford a convenient basis for discussing collective states , so let us consider some possible configurations involving pairs of electrons in graphene . let us first consider the degeneracies of undoped graphene placed in a strong magnetic field , confining the discussion to the case of a single landau level for simplicity . the single - particle states within the landau level will be assumed labeled by the quantum numbers @xmath138 , where @xmath17 is the principle quantum number labeling the landau level and @xmath139 is a quantum number distinguishing the degenerate states within the landau level . in the absence of spin and valley degrees of freedom , the states @xmath138 of the landau level are assumed to hold a maximum of @xmath140 electrons ( for consistency with earlier applications of the so(8 ) algebra in nuclear physics , @xmath141 will be defined to be the electron pair degeneracy , so that @xmath140 is the electron degeneracy ) . from the solution of the dirac equation in a magnetic field @xmath142 where @xmath12 is the strength of the magnetic field , @xmath143 is the area of the two - dimensional sample and @xmath144 defines the magnetic flux quantum . but graphene has in addition @xmath145 internal degrees of freedom associated with the @xmath146 space . thus there are four copies of each landau level in graphene and the total electron degeneracy @xmath147 is given by @xmath148 some pair degeneracies calculated from eq . ( [ degen1.2 ] ) as a function of domain size and magnetic field strength are displayed in table [ tb : degeneracytable ] , cccc ' '' '' domain size & @xmath149 & @xmath150 & @xmath151 + ' '' '' @xmath152 & @xmath153 & @xmath154 & @xmath155 + [ ] @xmath156 & @xmath157 & @xmath158 & @xmath159 + where it is assumed that the collective wavefunction is delocalized over the entire domain size . the _ fractional occupation _ @xmath160 of the single landau level [ not to be confused with the filling factor @xmath9 given in eqs . ( [ iqhegraph1.1 ] ) and ( [ fillingfactor ] ) ] may be defined as @xmath161 where @xmath17 is the number of electrons and @xmath162 is the number of electron pairs . for half - filling of the @xmath5 landau level located at the fermi surface ( corresponding to the ground state of undoped graphene ) the electron number @xmath163 is then @xmath164 these degeneracies and occupation numbers are just the standard results for relativistic landau levels in a 2d electron gas subject to a strong perpendicular magnetic field , but modified by the graphene spin and valley degeneracies . graphene exhibits both integral and fractional quantum hall effects but the filling factors are anomalous relative to those for standard quantum hall effects in semiconductor heterostructures . this is because of 1 . the 4-fold degeneracy associated with the spin and valley degrees of freedom , which introduces factors of four in the counting . 2 . the nature of the dirac solution , illustrated in fig . [ fig : llgraphene_n0 ] , for which the negative - energy solutions may be interpreted as electron holes , the positive - energy solutions as electrons , and the @xmath5 level is unique , being half - filled in the neutral ground state ( equivalently , it may be thought of as being shared equally by particles and holes ) . because of the particle - hole symmetry , the charge carriers change sign near the dirac points and the hall conductivity vanishes at charge neutrality ( the electron number density tends to zero at a dirac point ) . for this reason , the filling factor for graphene must be defined _ relative to the charge - neutral state . _ at charge neutrality the @xmath5 landau level is half filled and when the @xmath5 ll is completely full the filling factor is @xmath165 , from eq . ( [ iqhegraph1.2 ] ) . the quantum hall filling factor @xmath9 may be related to the landau level fractional occupation @xmath160 employed in the present formalism by @xmath166 therefore , half filling of the @xmath5 landau level corresponds to a fractional occupation @xmath167 but to a filling factor @xmath4 , @xmath168 corresponds to @xmath169 ( completely empty ) , @xmath170 corresponds to @xmath171 filling , @xmath172 corresponds to @xmath173 filling , and @xmath174 corresponds to @xmath175 ( completely full ) . consider the states created by repeated application of the pair creation operator @xmath115 defined by eq . ( [ algebra1.1 ] ) to the pair vacuum . it is useful to classify states according to a seniority - like quantum number @xmath176 defined to be the number of particles in the system not coupled to one of the pairs defined in eq . ( [ algebra1.1 ] ) . the @xmath177 subspace will be of particular interest since it will contain states of maximal collectivity with respect to the pairs ( [ algebra1.1 ] ) . an @xmath178-pair state in the @xmath177 subspace is given by @xmath179 where the total pair number @xmath178 is @xmath180 with @xmath17 giving the total number of electrons and @xmath181 giving the number of electron pairs created by @xmath182 operating on the vacuum state . for our discussion here it will always be assumed that one is dealing with @xmath177 states , corresponding physically to no broken pairs . from eq . ( [ algebra1.3 ] ) , the 16 operators @xmath125 are closed under commutation and form a @xmath184 subalgebra of the so(8 ) algebra ( [ algebra1.3 ] ) . let us now investigate the irreducible representations ( irreps ) that are associated with the @xmath185 subgroup chain in the @xmath177 representations . for @xmath177 at half filling , the number of pairs is @xmath186 and the highest - weight u(4 ) representation is given by @xmath187 . let us define a highest - weight ( hw ) state in the @xmath177 space , and choose it to correspond to the pair state with maximal value of @xmath99 from table [ tb : quantumnumbermapping ] , which results from placing one electron in the @xmath188 state and one electron in the @xmath189 state . thus , for @xmath190 pairs the highest weight state is given by @xmath191 where the sum runs over the @xmath192 states in the landau level labeled by the @xmath193 quantum number . the other states of the irreducible representation may then be created by the cartan dynkin algorithm , which consists of using raising and lowering operators in the weight space to construct successively all the other states beginning with the highest weight state @xcite . the state in eq . ( [ hwstate ] ) appears to have a quite complex form , involving a sum with number of terms equal to the pair degeneracy of the landau level raised to a power equal to the pair degeneracy ( with the pair degeneracy typically a large number ) . however , the actual structure of this state is considerably simpler than eq . ( [ hwstate ] ) would suggest because of the pauli principle . as an illustrative example of this assertion , let s construct explicitly the highest - weight state for the case @xmath194 , corresponding to @xmath195 pairs in a single landau level . writing the sum over @xmath196 in eq . ( [ hwstate ] ) out term by term gives @xmath197 where in raising the sum of operators inside the parentheses to the @xmath198 power , all products containing two or more creation operators with the same index vanish because of the pauli principle . similar considerations apply for arbitrary values of @xmath199 and in general the highest - weight state is given by @xmath200 where the simplification in going from the second to the third line is a consequence of the antisymmetry of the fermion creation operators ( the pauli principle ) implied by eq . ( [ anticommutator ] ) . thus the highest - weight state is a product state of pairs , one pair for each of the @xmath190 levels labeled by @xmath90 in the landau level . by the cartan dynkin algorithm , other states in the @xmath177 subspace can be constructed by applying successively to the highest - weight state appropriate lowering and raising operators . these will be functions of the generators @xmath125 , so for an arbitrary state @xmath201 in the weight space one has schematically @xmath202 where the function @xmath203 is specified by the cartan dynkin procedure . as an example , consider the action of the valley isospin lowering operator @xmath204 on the highest - weight state . from eqs . ( [ algebra1.9 ] ) and ( [ algebra1.2 ] ) , @xmath205 thus the state @xmath201 created by applying @xmath204 to @xmath206 is @xmath207 c_{{\scriptscriptstyle k\uparrow } m_k}^\dagger c_{{\scriptscriptstyle k\downarrow } m_k}^\dagger \ , { |0\rangle } \nonumber \\ & = \prod_{m_k } \left ( c_{3 m_k}^\dagger c_{2 m_k}^\dagger + c_{4 m_k}^\dagger c_{1 m_k}^\dagger \right ) { |0\rangle } , \label{u0pairs1.7}\end{aligned}\ ] ] where the simplifications are because the only terms that survive correspond to those where an annihilation operator in a factor inside the square brackets is exactly balanced by a creation operator from the factor outside the square brackets . likewise , the other states of the @xmath177 representation can be constructed by using successive applications of raising and lowering operators fashioned from the generators defined in in eqs . ( [ algebra1.8])([algebra1.11 ] ) . from the preceding discussion , for @xmath208 the states may be written as @xmath209 { |0\rangle } , \label{upairs1.8}\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath210 denote valley isospin projection quantum numbers and @xmath211 denote spin projection quantum numbers . this is the same form as the most general collective pair state used by kharitonov @xcite in his classification of possible broken symmetry states for the @xmath5 landau level in graphene ( see eq . ( [ basis1.0 ] ) in the appendix ) . thus , for undoped graphene the general pairing wavefunction ( [ u0pairs1.0 ] ) characteristic of the so(8 ) @xmath183 su(4 ) dynamical symmetry is in fact _ equivalent to the product form ( [ upairs1.8 ] ) _ employed in standard discussion of quantum hall ferromagnetism , for which the summations are over the internal @xmath212 rather than landau @xmath213 degrees of freedom . the equivalence of eqs . ( [ upairs1.8 ] ) and ( [ u0pairs1.0 ] ) , despite their superficially very different forms , is a fundamental consequence of the pauli principle acting in the collective fermionic pair subspace , which greatly restricts allowed pair configurations . the equivalence established above implies that the present so(8 ) formalism can be used to derive the framework used in ref . @xcite to describe possible collective states in graphene , which establishes an essential connection between the standard discussion of su(4 ) quantum hall magnetism in graphene and the present more general so(8 ) dynamical symmetry formalism . as will be demonstrated further below , this permits the so(8 ) formalism to ( 1 ) encompass the established physics of su(4 ) quantum hall ferromagnetism , ( 2 ) extend quantum hall ferromagnetism to suggest possible additional collective graphene physics beyond the su(4 ) limit , and ( 3 ) provide _ analytical solutions _ for the states suggested by spontaneous breaking of su(4 ) symmetry that can not be obtained using su(4 ) symmetry and must be addressed numerically , or with effective field theory approximations , within standard su(4 ) quantum hall ferromagnetism . furthermore , it will be seen below that the equivalence of product and paired forms for the wavefunction implies a deep formal connection between the collective states resulting from strong electron correlations in graphene landau levels and the collective states produced by strong nucleon correlations in nuclear structure physics , and a suggestive formal connection to the properties of the strongly - correlated electrons responsible for high - temperature superconductivity . the preceding discussion has established that the fermion dynamical symmetry method applied to undoped graphene in a strong magnetic field has one dynamical symmetry chain @xmath185 that recovers exactly su(4)-symmetric quantum hall ferromagnetism . since the @xmath125 operators introduced in eq . ( [ algebra1.2 ] ) form an su(4 ) subgroup of so(8 ) that is in one - to - one correspondence with the operators used to formulate the effective low - energy hamiltonian ( [ so5_1.1a ] ) , [ h : fdsgraphene ] implies that all of the physics associated with this effective hamiltonian that has been discussed in the prior literature ( see @xcite and references cited therein ) is implicit in the present formalism . furthermore , the discussion of [ h : pairrepresentations ] shows that the pair basis ( [ u0pairs1.0 ] ) of the truncated collective subspace for the so(8 ) fermion dynamical symmetry is in fact identical to the most general wavefunction ( [ upairs1.8 ] ) that has been proposed @xcite for collective states breaking the su(4 ) symmetry , despite its superficially very different form . thus the hilbert - space truncation implied by the collectively - paired so(8 ) subspace ( [ u0pairs1.0 ] ) recovers the understanding in the existing literature of the classes of states to be expected from spontaneous breaking of the su(4 ) symmetry by valley - dependent correlations . however , the existing discussions of these collective states in terms of broken su(4 ) symmetry have been largely qualitative , and have turned to numerical simulations to discuss the actual structure and energy of the states . it will now be demonstrated that the present formalism is capable not only of classifying , but also of addressing the quantitative nature of those collective states _ in analytical fashion . _ furthermore , it will be shown that the so(8 ) highest symmetry implies subgroup chains in addition to @xmath214 that are associated with spontaneous breaking of the symmetry by correlations and have not been discussed in the previous literature and that may play a role in graphene . let us begin that discussion by first transforming to a more convenient representation of the so(8 ) generators . this new representation will be physically equivalent to the original representation , but will offer some advantages in interpretation , and will expose an unexpected relationship between graphene physics and that of a very different field , nuclear structure physics . for the pair creation operators defined in eq . ( [ algebra1.1 ] ) , each electron creation operator @xmath91 carries both spin and valley isospin ; hence the products @xmath215 correspond to a clebsch gordan series representing sums of terms having different values of total spin and total isospin . likewise , in the particle hole operators of eq . ( [ algebra1.2 ] ) each creation operator @xmath91 and annihilation operator @xmath92 carries spin and isospin , so the product @xmath216 in eq . ( [ algebra1.2 ] ) represents a superposition of states carrying different total spin and total valley isospin . these representations with indefinite spin and isospin will be termed _ uncoupled representations . _ on physical grounds , the spin is expected to be conserved ( if the zeeman term in the hamiltonian is neglected ) and the valley isospin is expected to be approximately conserved for low - energy excitations . thus , it is desirable to use the uncoupled representation of the pairing and particle hole operators to construct new _ coupled representations _ that have good total spin and good total valley isospin quantum numbers for bilinear operators . using standard angular momentum coupling theory @xcite , an electron pair creation operator coupled to good spin and valley isospin may be defined by @xmath217 where @xmath143 is the total spin of the pair with @xmath218 its projection , @xmath219 is the total valley isospin of the pair with @xmath220 its projection , and @xmath221 are clebsch gordan coefficients for the angular momentum sum @xmath222 that couple the pair to good total spin or total valley isospin . antisymmetry implies that the the pair wavefunction can have only @xmath223 , @xmath224 ; or @xmath225 , @xmath226 ( spin - triplet , isospin - singlet ; or spin - singlet , isospin - triplet pairs ) . explicitly the possibilities are @xmath227 { a_{\scriptscriptstyle 00}^{\raisebox{0.2em}{$\scriptstyle\dagger$ } { \scriptscriptstyle 0 1 } } } = a_{14}^\dagger + a_{23}^\dagger \quad { a_{\scriptscriptstyle 01}^{\raisebox{0.2em}{$\scriptstyle\dagger$ } { \scriptscriptstyle 0 1 } } } = \sqrt 2 a_{13}^\dagger \qquad { a_{\scriptscriptstyle 0 - 1}^{\raisebox{0.2em}{$\scriptstyle\dagger$ } { \scriptscriptstyle 0 1 } } } = \sqrt2 a_{24}^\dagger , \end{array } \label{coupled1.3}\ ] ] with the hermitian conjugates of eq . ( [ coupled1.3 ] ) giving the six corresponding pair annihilation operators in coupled representation . it is useful to define an alternative set of six coupled pairing operators @xmath228 and @xmath229 according to @xmath230 d_0^\dagger = \tfrac{1}{\sqrt2 } \,{a_{\scriptscriptstyle 00}^{\raisebox{0.2em}{$\scriptstyle\dagger$ } { \scriptscriptstyle 0 1 } } } = \tfrac{1}{\sqrt2 } \left ( a_{14}^\dagger + a_{23}^\dagger \right ) \\[7pt ] d_1^\dagger = \tfrac{1}{\sqrt2 } \ , { a_{\scriptscriptstyle 01}^{\raisebox{0.2em}{$\scriptstyle\dagger$ } { \scriptscriptstyle 0 1 } } } = a_{13}^\dagger \quad d_{-1}^\dagger = \tfrac{1}{\sqrt2 } \,{a_{\scriptscriptstyle 0 - 1}^{\raisebox{0.2em}{$\scriptstyle\dagger$ } { \scriptscriptstyle 0 1 } } } = a_{24}^\dagger \\[7pt ] d_2^\dagger = \tfrac{1}{\sqrt2 } \ , { a_{\scriptscriptstyle 10}^{\raisebox{0.2em}{$\scriptstyle\dagger$ } { \scriptscriptstyle 1 0 } } } = a^\dagger_{12 } \quad d_{-2}^\dagger = \tfrac{1}{\sqrt2 } \,{a_{\scriptscriptstyle -10}^{\raisebox{0.2em}{$\scriptstyle\dagger$ } { \scriptscriptstyle 1 0 } } } = a_{34}^\dagger \end{array } \label{coupled1.4}\ ] ] and the six corresponding hermitian conjugates @xmath143 and @xmath231 . the physical meaning of these pairs may be deduced by constructing the corresponding electronic configurations . consider @xmath232 . from eqs . ( [ coupled1.4 ] ) and ( [ algebra1.1 ] ) @xmath233 where in the last step the correspondence between the index @xmath234 and the valley ( @xmath2 or @xmath3 ) and spin ( @xmath235 ) labels in table [ tb : quantumnumbermapping ] has been invoked . this implies that @xmath236 creates a state with one spin - up and one spin - down electron on each equivalent site @xmath2 in the brillouin zone , as illustrated schematically in fig . [ fig : actionddagger2 ] . figures / actionddagger2.eps 0pt 0.35 the action of the pair creation operator @xmath237 on the vacuum state is to create a charge density wave with a spin - singlet pair on each site @xmath2 and no electrons on the @xmath3 sites . this is a component of a lattice - scale charge density wave , since the charge differs by two electronic units between adjacent sites . likewise , one finds that @xmath238 creates a charge density wave as in fig . [ fig : actionddagger2 ] , but with the spin - singlet pairs on the @xmath15 sites . the pair configurations produced by all generators of eq . ( [ coupled1.4 ] ) operating on the pair vacuum @xmath239 are summarized in fig . [ fig : s_d_pairs_brillouin ] . figures / s_d_pairs_brillouin_withq.eps 0pt 0.30 configurations created by the @xmath228 and @xmath240 pair creation operators of eq . ( [ coupled1.4 ] ) , and for the linear combinations @xmath241 of eq . ( [ qdef ] ) , operating on the pair vacuum @xmath239 . the upper left box illustrates the valley isospin labeling . a total of six valence electrons as assumed to be distributed on sites in the brillouin zone . in each pair configuration , location of the dots ( @xmath2 or @xmath3 site ) indicates the valley isospin , spin - up electrons are indicated by up arrows , and spin - down electrons are indicated by down arrows . also shown are the configurations generated by the linear combinations @xmath242 which will be useful in later discussion . kharitonov has given a general classification of low - lying collective modes for the @xmath5 landau level of graphene in terms of collective pairs @xcite . the collective pairs created by the so(8 ) pair generators in fig . [ fig : s_d_pairs_brillouin ] are similar physically to the pairs identified by kharitonov , as will now be described . ( 1 ) the configuration generated by @xmath243 is to the difference of two terms , each with alternating spin - up and spin - down on adjacent sites , implying that all spins on the a sublattice ( identified with valley @xmath2 ) point in one direction and all spins on the b sublattice ( identified with valley @xmath15 ) point in the opposite direction . each term corresponds to a spin density wave ( af order ) , with a nel vector defined by the difference in total spins on the two sublattices serving as an order parameter , but because of the difference of the two terms the net af order for this configuration is zero ( see [ sh : orderparameters ] and table [ tb : orderparms ] ) . ( 2 ) the configurations generated by @xmath244 are spin - singlet charge density waves , with alternating charges of two and zero units on adjacent sites . an appropriate order parameter is the difference in charge between the a and b sublattices . ( 3 ) the configurations generated by @xmath245 have one spin on each site , all pointing in the same direction ; this is a ferromagnetic state , with the net spin as an order parameter . ( 4 ) the configuration generated by @xmath246 is the same as that generated by @xmath243 , except for a positive sign for the second term . this also implies alternating spins on adjacent sites and af order for each term , but the total af order vanishes because of the contribution of the two terms . ( 5 ) the configurations corresponding to @xmath247 are states with af order characterized by the difference in spins on the two sublattices labeled by @xmath2 and @xmath3 . thus the coupled - representation pairs carrying good spin and valley isospin quantum numbers in eq . ( [ coupled1.4 ] ) represent physical degrees of freedom already discussed in the literature as candidate collective modes representing spontaneous breaking of the su(4 ) graphene symmetry by interactions in a single partially - filled landau level . it is desirable to express the particle hole generators of eq . ( [ algebra1.2 ] ) in coupled representation . let us begin by introducing a set of operators @xmath248 with the definition @xmath249 where @xmath250 and @xmath251 take the values of the fictitious angular momentum projection @xmath99 in table [ tb : quantumnumbermapping ] , providing a labeling equivalent to that of @xmath100 and @xmath120 in @xmath125 , with @xmath250 or @xmath251 values @xmath252 mapping to @xmath100 or @xmath120 values @xmath253 , respectively . for example , from table [ tb : quantumnumbermapping ] , @xmath254 and @xmath255 label the same quantity , which is defined in eq . ( [ algebra1.2 ] ) . from the selection rules for angular momentum coupling in eq . ( [ multipole1.1 ] ) , the index @xmath256 can take the values @xmath257 , with @xmath258 projections @xmath259 for each possibility , which gives a total of 16 operators @xmath260 . by inserting the explicit values of the clebsch gordan coefficients the 16 independent @xmath261 may be evaluated in terms of the @xmath125 . @xmath262 p^1_0 & = \sqrt{\tfrac{9}{20}}(b_{11 } - b_{44 } ) + \sqrt{\tfrac{1}{20}}(b_{22 } -b_{33 } ) \nonumber \\ & = \sqrt{\tfrac{9}{20}}(n_1 - n_4 ) + \sqrt{\tfrac{1}{20}}(n_2 -n_3 ) \nonumber \\[2pt ] p^1_1 & = -\sqrt{\tfrac{3}{10 } } \,b_{12 } - \sqrt{\tfrac{4}{10 } } \,b_{23 } -\sqrt{\tfrac{3}{10}}\ , b_{34 } \nonumber \\[2pt ] p^1_{-1 } & = \sqrt{\tfrac{3}{10 } } \,b_{21 } + \sqrt{\tfrac{4}{10 } } \,b_{32 } + \sqrt{\tfrac{3}{10}}\ , b_{43 } \nonumber \\[2pt ] p^2_0 & = \tfrac{1}{2 } ( b_{11 } - b_{22 } + b_{44 } - b_{33 } ) \nonumber \\ & = \tfrac12(n_1 - n_2 + n_4 - n_3 ) \nonumber \\[2pt ] p^2_1 & = \tfrac{1}{\sqrt{2 } } ( b_{34 } - b_{12 } ) \qquad p^2_{-1 } = \tfrac{1}{\sqrt2 } ( b_{21 } - b_{43 } ) \label{pofb } \\[2pt ] p^2_2 & = -\tfrac{1}{\sqrt{2 } } ( b_{13 } + b_{24 } ) \qquad p^2_{-2 } = -\tfrac{1}{\sqrt2 } ( b_{31 } + b_{42 } ) \nonumber \\[2pt ] p^3_0 & = \sqrt{\tfrac{1}{20 } } ( b_{11 } - b_{44 } ) + \sqrt{\tfrac{9}{20 } } ( b_{33}-b_{22 } ) \nonumber \\ & = \sqrt{\tfrac{1}{20 } } ( n_1 - n_4 ) - \sqrt{\tfrac{9}{20 } } ( n_2 - n_3 ) \nonumber \\[2pt ] p^3_1 & = -\sqrt{\tfrac15 } b_{12 } + \sqrt{\tfrac35 } b_{23 } - \sqrt{\tfrac15 } b_{34 } \nonumber \\[2pt ] p^3_{-1 } & = \sqrt{\tfrac15 } b_{21 } - \sqrt{\tfrac35 } b_{32 } + \sqrt{\tfrac15 } b_{43 } \nonumber \\[2pt ] p^3_2 & = \sqrt{\tfrac12 } ( b_{24 } - b_{13 } ) \qquad p^3_{-2}= \sqrt{\tfrac12 } ( b_{42 } - b_{31 } ) \nonumber \\[2pt ] p^3_3 & = -b_{14 } \qquad p^3_{-3 } = b_{41 } , \nonumber\end{aligned}\ ] ] where the @xmath263 are number operators for each of the four states and the total particle number @xmath17 is the sum over the four states labeled by @xmath100 in table [ tb : quantumnumbermapping ] , @xmath264 it will be convenient notationally to sometimes replace the operator @xmath265 with the operator @xmath266 , according to the relationship @xmath267 where @xmath147 is the degeneracy of the space for the particles that participate in the so(8 ) symmetry . physically @xmath268 is one half the particle number measured from half filling ( which corresponds to @xmath269 ) . because the six operators defined by eq . ( [ coupled1.4 ] ) , their six hermitian conjugates , and the 16 operators defined by eq . ( [ multipole1.1 ] ) are independent linear combinations of the so(8 ) generators defined in eqs . ( [ algebra1.1 ] ) and ( [ algebra1.2 ] ) , the 28 operators @xmath270 also close an so(8 ) algebra under commutation . the so(8 ) commutation relations for the coupled representation @xmath271 are given explicitly by @xcite @xmath272 } & = -2s_0 \label{commcoupled1.1 } \\ { \left[d_{\mu ' } , d^\dagger_{\mu}\right ] } & = -2\delta_{\mu\mu ' } s_0 + \sum_{t { \rm\ odd } } ( -1)^{\mu ' } \nonumber \\ & \qquad \times \ { c_{2 , \scriptscriptstyle-\mu ' 2 \mu}^{\,t,\scriptscriptstyle\mu-\mu ' } } { \left\ { \begin{matrix } 2&2&t\\#4&\tfrac32&\tfrac32 \end{matrix}\right\ } } p_{\scriptscriptstyle\mu,-\mu'}^t \label{commcoupled1.2 } \\ { \left[d_\mu^\dagger , s\right ] } & = p_\mu^2 \label{commcoupled1.3 } \\ { \left[p^r_\mu , s^\dagger\right ] } & = 2 \delta_{r2}d^\dagger_\mu + 2 \delta_{r0 } \delta_{\mu0 } s^\dagger \label{commcoupled1.4 } \\ { \left[p_{\mu'}^r , d_\mu^\dagger\right ] } & = 2(-1)^{\mu ' } \delta_{r2 } \delta_{-\mu\mu ' } -4\sqrt{5(2r+1 ) } \nonumber \\ & \qquad\times\ { c_{r \scriptscriptstyle\mu ' 2 \mu}^{2,\scriptscriptstyle\mu+\mu ' } } { \left\ { \begin{matrix } 2&2&r\\#4&\tfrac32&\tfrac32 \end{matrix}\right\ } } d_{\scriptscriptstyle\mu+\mu'}^\dagger \label{commcoupled1.5 } \\ { \left[p^r_{\mu ' } , p^s_\mu\right ] } & = 2 ( -1)^{r+s } \sqrt{(2r+1)(2s+1 ) } \,\,\sum_t { c_{r { \scriptscriptstyle\mu ' } s { \scriptscriptstyle\mu}}^{\,t , { \scriptscriptstyle \mu+\mu ' } } } \nonumber \\ & \times \left[1-(-1)^{r+s+t}\right ] { \left\ { \begin{matrix } r&s&t\\#4&\tfrac32&\tfrac32 \end{matrix}\right\ } } p^{\,t}_{\scriptscriptstyle\mu+\mu ' } \label{commcoupled1.6}\end{aligned}\ ] ] [ commcoupled ] where @xmath266 is defined in eq . ( [ p0n ] ) and @xmath273 denotes the wigner 6-@xmath274 symbol @xcite for the recoupling of three angular momenta to good total angular momentum . the action of the so(8 ) pair creation operators on the pair vacuum @xmath178 times creates a @xmath275-particle state @xcite , @xmath276 where the total number of pairs is @xmath277 . the portion of the full hilbert space that is spanned by the states ( [ collective1.1 ] ) will be termed the _ collective subspace . _ it will play an important role in subsequent discussion where it will be shown that the so(8 ) symmetry may be used to construct effective hamiltonians that are diagonal in this space , and that the generators of so(8 ) do not couple the subspace to the remainder of the space . the reason for our alternative labeling of the states in table [ tb : quantumnumbermapping ] in terms of the index @xmath99 , and our particular choices of phases and normalizations in equations , can now be made clear . with these labelings and choices the six coupled particle particle operators @xmath228 and @xmath278 defined in eq . ( [ coupled1.4 ] ) , their six hermitian conjugates @xmath143 and @xmath231 , and the 16 coupled particle hole operators @xmath279 defined in eq . ( [ multipole1.1 ] ) , are mathematically in one - to - one correspondence with the 28 generators for the ginocchio so(8 ) model @xcite and the so(8 ) fermion dynamical symmetry model @xcite . these have found broad application in nuclear structure physics @xcite and may be viewed as a microscopic justification for the interacting boson model ( ibm ) @xcite , which is one of the most commonly used phenomenological models in nuclear structure physics . this correspondence has three important implications : ( 1 ) mathematically , the group - theoretical methodology obtained for so(8 ) already in nuclear physics applications may be appropriated for use in the graphene problem . ( 2 ) physically the nature of the generators for the nuclear physics and graphene so(8 ) symmetries are fundamentally different , but analogs of physical interpretations applied already for nuclear physics so(8 ) symmetries may shed light on the graphene problem . ( 3 ) philosophically , the so(8 ) correspondence between graphene and nuclear structure physics implies a satisfying convergence of mathematical reasoning and physical abstraction in two completely different scientific subfields . this convergence will be elaborated further in [ h : analogy_su4 ] . the so(8 ) group has various subgroups ( subsets of generators closed under commutation ) and these in turn may have other subgroups . these sequences of subgroups define subgroup chains . these chains will be discussed first in terms of the nuclear physics basis @xmath280 , and then in terms of a new basis that is mathematically equivalent but is physically better suited to describing the physics of graphene . in the nuclear physics basis @xmath281 is the particle number and generates a group @xmath282 , while @xmath283 is proportional to the total angular momentum and generates a group @xmath284 . in the nuclear physics context the total angular momentum and the particle number are expected to be conserved exactly for all physical states . thus one seeks subgroup chains of so(8 ) that end in the subgroup @xmath285 corresponding to charge and angular momentum conservation . three so(8 ) subgroup chains satisfy these conditions . from eq . ( [ commcoupled1.1 ] ) the quasispin generators @xmath288 close an @xmath289 algebra that is a subalgebra of so(8 ) , and from eq . ( [ commcoupled1.4 ] ) the operators @xmath260 with @xmath290 close an so(5 ) algebra and commute with these su(2 ) quasispin generators . thus , one subgroup of so(8 ) is @xmath291 where so(5 ) is generated by the 10 operators @xmath292 , where @xmath259 takes the @xmath258 values @xmath293 and the _ quasispin group _ @xmath289 is generated by @xmath294 , where @xmath295 . furthermore , the three generators @xmath296 are components of the total angular momentum @xmath297 and generate an @xmath284 subgroup of so(5 ) , and @xmath266 generates a @xmath282 subgroup of @xmath289 corresponding to conservation of charge . thus one subgroup chain is @xmath298 & \supset \underset{\scriptscriptstyle\ { p^1\ } } { { { \rm so(3)}}_l}\times\underset{\scriptscriptstyle \ { s_0 \ } } { { { { \rm u(1)}}_{{\scriptstyle\rm c } } } } , \label{chains1.2n}\end{aligned}\ ] ] where the generators of each subgroup are indicated in brackets below the subgroup and the product group on the last line corresponds to conservation of total angular momentum and particle number . the groups su(4 ) and so(6 ) share the same lie algebra . in nuclear physics it is more common to refer to this group as so(6 ) , but to maintain a parallel with the ensuing treatment of graphene it will be labeled su(4 ) in the present discussion . from eq . ( [ commcoupled1.6 ] ) , the 16 operators @xmath300 are closed under commutation , corresponding to @xmath301 where the generator of @xmath282 is @xmath302 and the 15 operators @xmath303 are the generators of su(4 ) . furthermore , the subset of @xmath304 with odd @xmath256 are generators of the so(5 ) symmetry discussed above and so generate an so(5 ) subgroup of this su(4 ) group . hence a second subgroup chain is @xmath305 & \supset \underset{\scriptscriptstyle \ { p^1 , \ , p^3\}}{{{\rm so(5 ) } } } \times \underset{\scriptscriptstyle \ { s_0\}}{{{{\rm u(1)}}_{{\scriptstyle\rm c } } } } \supset \underset{\scriptscriptstyle\ { p^1\ } } { { { \rm so(3)}}_l}\times\underset{\scriptscriptstyle \ { s_0 \ } } { { { { \rm u(1)}}_{{\scriptstyle\rm c } } } } , \label{chains1.3n}\end{aligned}\ ] ] where eq . ( [ p0n ] ) has been used to replace @xmath306 with @xmath266 . from eqs . ( [ commcoupled1.2 ] ) , ( [ commcoupled1.5 ] ) , and ( [ commcoupled1.6 ] ) , the 21 operators @xmath307 close an @xmath308 subalgebra of so(8 ) and the subset @xmath309 closes an @xmath310 subalgebra of so(7 ) . thus a third subgroup chain is given by @xmath311 the relationships of the nuclear analog so(8 ) subgroup chains described above are summarized in fig . [ fig : dynamicalchains ] . nuclear analog so(8 ) subgroup chains with generators in the coupled representation @xmath312 given by eqs . ( [ multipole1.1 ] ) and ( [ coupled1.4 ] ) and obeying the lie algebra of eq . ( [ commcoupled ] ) . generators are indicated below each group factor and @xmath266 and @xmath313 may be interchanged using eq . ( [ p0n ] ) . the subgroup structure expressed in this basis is in one - to - one correspondence with the so(8 ) fermion dynamical symmetry model @xcite of nuclear structure physics . however , for the description of graphene it is more useful to transform this basis to the new one employed in fig . [ fig : dynamicalchains_graphene ] using eqs . ( [ ngx ] ) , which gives a more direct physical interpretation of quantities important in graphene physics . ] the subgroup chains in [ h : subgroupchainsnuclear ] were expressed in terms of the nuclear physics basis @xmath314 . this basis demonstrates the deep connection between graphene quantum hall physics and nuclear structure physics , and is suitable mathematically to describe graphene quantum hall effects . however , it is not well suited physically to interpreting the graphene quantum hall effects for three reasons . ( 1 ) the relationship between the generators of the @xmath185 subgroup in the nuclear physics basis and those of the su(4 ) quantum hall ferromagnetism basis defined in eq . ( [ algebra1.4 ] ) is not clear , which hinders interpretation of the present results in terms of preceding results found in the graphene literature . ( 2 ) charge and electronic spin are expected to be conserved in graphene ( if the zeeman term is neglected ) , but none of the generators @xmath315 can be interpreted as spin in the application to graphene ( instead , spin is a linear combination of these generators ) . for physical applications it is desirable to employ a basis in which the relevant conservation laws are manifest . ( 3 ) in addition to the exact conservation laws expected for charge and spin in graphene , it is expected on physical grounds that for low - energy excitations the scattering between valleys is strongly suppressed and the difference in electron densities between neighboring valleys should be very nearly conserved . this difference is expressed by the @xmath58 component of the valley isospin @xmath70 , and the corresponding approximate invariance is reflected in a @xmath316 symmetry generated by @xmath70 . but @xmath70 is not proportional to any of the @xmath304 generators ( it is a linear combination of these generators ) , so this approximate invariance is not manifest in the nuclear su(4 ) basis . thus a new basis will be employed for the so(8 ) generators in application to graphene for which the particle number ( charge ) operator @xmath17 or @xmath266 and the 12 pairing operators @xmath317 are retained , but the 15 su(4 ) generators @xmath318 in the nuclear representation are replaced with the 15 su(4 ) generators @xmath319 with @xmath320 defined in the graphene representation given in eq . ( [ algebra1.4 ] ) , @xmath321 \ { { \mathscr{s}}_\alpha,\ , t_\alpha,\ , n_\alpha,\ , { \pi_{\alphax } } , \,{\pi_{\alphay } } , \ , s_0 , \ , s , \,s^\dagger , \,d{^{\vphantom{\dagger}}}_{\mu},\ , d^\dagger_\mu \ } { _ { \mbox{\scriptsizegraphene so(8 ) } } } . \end{array}\ ] ] the transformation from the @xmath322 generators to the @xmath323 generators is given in appendix [ h : appendixb ] . in the new basis it will be convenient to take as order parameters @xmath324 [ orderp1.1 ] where @xmath325 is the number operator counting particles in basis state @xmath326 and the expectation value is taken with respect to the collective wavefunction . physically ( 1 ) the net spin is measured by @xmath327 , which characterizes _ ferromagnetic _ order . ( 2 ) the difference in charge between the a and b sublattices is measured by @xmath328 , which characterizes _ charge density wave _ order . ( 3 ) the difference in spins between the a and b sublattices is measured by @xmath329 , which characterizes _ antiferromagnetic _ ( nel or spin density wave ) order . the order parameters evaluated for the states of fig . [ fig : s_d_pairs_brillouin ] are displayed in table [ tb : orderparms ] . lccc ' '' '' state & @xmath327 & @xmath328 & @xmath329 + ' '' '' @xmath330 & @xmath331 & @xmath331 & @xmath331 + [ ] @xmath332 & @xmath331 & @xmath333 & @xmath331 + [ ] @xmath334 & @xmath331 & @xmath103 & @xmath331 + [ ] @xmath335 & @xmath333 & @xmath331 & @xmath331 + [ ] @xmath336 & @xmath103 & @xmath331 & @xmath331 + [ ] @xmath337 & @xmath331 & @xmath331 & @xmath331 + [ ] @xmath338 & @xmath331 & @xmath331 & @xmath103 + [ ] @xmath339 & @xmath331 & @xmath331 & @xmath333 + in the new basis it will be assumed that both charge and spin are exactly conserved for the physical states of the model in the absence of the zeeman term @xmath54 , that the charge and the @xmath58-component of spin are exactly conserved if the zeeman term is included in the hamiltonian , and that @xmath70 is conserved , where appropriate . neglecting the zeeman term , the spin charge symmetry corresponds to a group structure @xmath340 , where @xmath341 is generated by the spin operators and @xmath282 is generated by the particle number operator . thus one seeks subgroup chains of so(8 ) that end in the subgroup @xmath340 corresponding to charge and spin conservation , and in some of these chains a u(1)@xmath74 subgroup implying conservation of @xmath70 will also be required . the group and subgroup structure in the new basis is illustrated in fig . [ fig : dynamicalchains_graphene ] , where seven nontrivial subgroup chains may be identified that begin with so(8 ) and end with the symmetry @xmath342 corresponding to conservation of charge and @xmath58-component of the spin in the magnetic field . @xmath343 [ groupchains ] where for brevity all u(1 ) factors are dropped in the notation and su(2 ) means su(2)@xmath344 corresponding to conservation of spin . each of these corresponds to a different dynamical symmetry that is realized for particular choices of parameters for the so(8 ) hamiltonian , and that yields _ exact manybody solutions _ using the dynamical symmetry methodology . let us now discuss in more detail three subgroup chains of so(8 ) . the quasispin generators @xmath345 close an @xmath289 algebra that is a subalgebra of so(8 ) , and the operators @xmath346 close an so(5 ) algebra and commute with these su(2 ) quasispin generators . putting this together , one subgroup of so(8 ) is @xmath347 furthermore , the three generators @xmath348 are components of the total spin and generate an @xmath341 subgroup of so(5 ) , and @xmath266 generates a @xmath282 subgroup of @xmath289 corresponding to conservation of charge . thus one subgroup chain is @xmath349 & \supset { { { \rm su(2)}}_{\sigma}}\times{{{\rm u(1)}}_{{\scriptstyle\rm c } } } , \label{chains1.2}\end{aligned}\ ] ] where the product group on the last line corresponds to conservation of spin and charge . this subgroup chain with its corresponding generators is illustrated in fig . [ fig : dynamicalchains_graphene ] . alternatively , so(5 ) may be broken according to the pattern @xmath350 & \supset { { { \rm su(2)}}_{\sigma}}\times { { { \rm u(1)}}_{{\scriptstyle\rm c } } } , \label{chains1.2b}\end{aligned}\ ] ] which also conserves spin and charge , and is illustrated in fig . [ fig : dynamicalchains_graphene ] . a @xmath351 subgroup of so(8 ) may be obtained by removing the 12 pairing operators from the so(8 ) generator set . the @xmath352 subgroup is generated by the particle number ( charge ) and the su(4 ) subgroup is generated by the 15 remaining operators , which are defined in eq . ( [ algebra1.4 ] ) in the current basis . there are several options for chains corresponding to further subgroups . ( 1 ) the subset @xmath353 defines generators of the so(5 ) symmetry discussed above and so forms an so(5 ) subgroup of this su(4 ) group . hence one su(4 ) subgroup chain is @xmath354 which is displayed in fig . [ fig : dynamicalchains_graphene ] . ( 2 ) physically , the total spin is conserved . if there is little inter - valley scattering one may also assume the spin within each @xmath2 valley and each @xmath3 valley to be separately conserved , corresponding to a @xmath355 symmetry . thus a second su(4 ) subgroup chain corresponds to @xmath356 & \supset { { { \rm su(2)}}_{\sigma}}\times { { { \rm u(1)}}_{{\scriptstyle\rm c } } } , \label{chainy1.1}\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath316 is generated by @xmath70 . this chain also is displayed in fig . [ fig : dynamicalchains_graphene ] . ( 3 ) finally , one can imagine that su(4 ) is broken into subgroups corresponding to simultaneous conservation of both spin and valley isospin , giving a third su(4 ) subgroup chain @xmath357 as illustrated in fig . [ fig : dynamicalchains_graphene ] . comparing fig . [ fig : dynamicalchains_graphene ] with fig . [ fig : dynamicalchains_qhf ] , it is apparent that the three @xmath358 subgroup chains defined in this section correspond to the three symmetry - breaking patterns described in [ h : symmetriesfqhegraphene ] and discussed in refs . @xcite for the su(4 ) quantum hall ferromagnetism model . the portion of the so(8 ) subgroup structure leading to su(4 ) quantum hall ferromagnetism is indicated by the shaded boxes with dashed outer boundaries in fig . [ fig : dynamicalchains_graphene ] . thus it is seen explicitly that the special case corresponding to the @xmath358 subgroup chains of the present model imply the results of refs . @xcite . the 21 operators @xmath359 close an @xmath360 subalgebra of so(8 ) , and the subset of generators @xmath361 close an @xmath362 subalgebra of so(7 ) . thus a third subgroup chain is given by @xmath363 as illustrated in fig . [ fig : dynamicalchains_graphene ] . this subgroup chain is of particular interest because it will define a _ critical dynamical symmetry _ that represents an entire phase exhibiting critical behavior and interpolating between two other phases . let us use the subgroup structure of the preceding section to obtain exact solutions of the correlated many - body problem in these dynamical symmetry limits . the basic idea is to use the casimir invariants of the subgroup chains like those described in [ h : subgroupchainsgraphene ] and illustrated in fig . [ fig : dynamicalchains_graphene ] to label states . then model hamiltonians constructed only from the casimir invariants of a single subgroup chain permit analytical solution of the effective schrdinger equation in that symmetry limit @xcite . specifically , if a hamiltonian @xmath364 can be expressed as a function of the casimir invariants of some subgroup chain @xmath365 , where the @xmath366 represent casimir operators for the groups @xmath367 , then the system is said to possess a dynamical symmetry associated with the subgroup chain . the discussion will be simplified by restricting to the lowest - order casimir invariant for each group , which corresponds physically to omitting @xmath17-body interactions with @xmath368 . elementary properties of lie groups then permit the eigenvalues @xmath369 and eigenfunctions @xmath370 of this hamiltonian to be expressed in closed form as @xmath371 where the @xmath372 stand for the quantum numbers required to specify the irreducible representations ( irreps ) of the groups @xmath367 . the physical properties of the corresponding states can then be elucidated by using the methods of lie groups and lie algebras to evaluate matrix elements for observables . in this way , one generally finds that the dynamical symmetries associated with subgroup chains of some highest symmetry define collective ( emergent ) states that correspond to particular patterns of spontaneous symmetry breaking . in terms of the generators ( [ coupled1.4 ] ) , ( [ multipole1.1 ] ) , and ( [ algebra1.4 ] ) , the quadratic casimir operator @xmath373 for the so(5 ) subgroup is @xmath374 where @xmath375 . the corresponding casimir operator for the @xmath376 subgroup is @xmath377 the quadratic casimir operator for the so(7 ) subgroup is @xmath378 the casimirs for the su(2 ) subgroups are @xmath379 and for the u(1 ) charge subgroup the invariant operator is trivially the single generator , @xmath380 or some power of it . finally , the quadratic casimir operator for the full so(8 ) group may be expressed as @xmath381 the casimir operators that appear in each of these subgroups chains and the relevant quantum numbers labeling the states for each dynamical symmetry are summarized in table [ tb : so8subgroups ] . llllll ' '' '' group & dim & generators & quantum numbers@xmath382 & casimir operators @xmath383 & casimir eigenvalues@xmath384 + ' '' '' @xmath385 & @xmath386 & @xmath387 & @xmath388 & @xmath389 & @xmath390 + [ ] @xmath391 & @xmath392 & @xmath393 or & @xmath394 & @xmath395 & @xmath396 + [ ] & & @xmath397 & & & + [ ] @xmath398 & @xmath399 & @xmath400 or & @xmath401 & @xmath402 & @xmath403 + [ ] & & @xmath404 & & @xmath405 & + [ ] u(4 ) & @xmath406 & @xmath407 & @xmath408 & @xmath409 & @xmath410 + [ ] @xmath411 & @xmath412 & @xmath413 or & @xmath414 & @xmath415 & @xmath416 + [ ] & & @xmath417 & & @xmath418 & + [ ] @xmath289 & @xmath108 & @xmath419 & @xmath9 & @xmath420 & @xmath421 + [ ] @xmath341 & @xmath108 & @xmath422 & @xmath423 & @xmath424 & @xmath425 + [ ] @xmath426 & @xmath108 & @xmath63 & @xmath86 & @xmath427 & @xmath428 + [ ] @xmath282 & @xmath103 & @xmath266 & @xmath17 & @xmath266 & @xmath429 + + + + + + + + in the next section these results for the casimir operators will be used to construct the most general hamiltonian permitted in the truncated collective space for specific dynamical symmetries . as has been seen , in a particular dynamical symmetry limit the most general hamiltonian can be constructed from a sum of casimir invariants for the groups contained in the corresponding subgroup chain . for so(8 ) dynamical symmetries the most general hamiltonian in the absence of the zeeman term is represented by the linear combination @xmath430 where @xmath431 is assumed constant in the symmetry limit , the casimir operators @xmath373 have been summarized in the preceding section , and @xmath432 does not appear explicitly because it has been eliminated by the constraint @xcite : @xmath433 hamiltonians representing specific dynamical symmetry limits then correspond to particular choices of the coefficients @xmath434 in this general expression . it may be shown that the most general hamiltonian can also be expressed in the compact form ( see eqs . ( 4.1 ) of ref . @xcite ) @xmath435 where @xmath436 is assumed constant in a symmetry limit and where the different dynamical symmetry limits correspond to specific choices for the values of the parameters @xmath437 , @xmath438 , and @xmath439 . the last term is expressed in terms of the @xmath304 from the nuclear basis . it can be converted to the graphene basis by inverting eqs . ( [ ngx ] ) of appendix [ h : appendixb ] to solve for the @xmath304 . let us now discuss each of the so(8 ) dynamical symmetries and their physical interpretations . for brevity , let us refer to 1 . the dynamical symmetry structure associated with eqs . ( [ chains1.2 ] ) and ( [ chains1.2b ] ) as the _ @xmath440 dynamical symmetry , _ 2 . the dynamical symmetry structure associated with eqs . ( [ chains1.3])([chainy1.2 ] ) as the _ su(4 ) dynamical symmetry , _ and 3 . the dynamical symmetry structure associated with eq . ( [ chains1.4 ] ) as the _ so(7 ) dynamical symmetry . _ initially the role of the zeeman term ( which would break the full spin symmetry down to conservation of its @xmath58 component ) will be ignored and it will be assumed that the chains end in the subgroup @xmath441 corresponding to the physical requirement that spin and charge be conserved exactly . the dynamical symmetry chains given in eqs . ( [ chains1.2])([chains1.2b ] ) and illustrated in fig . [ fig : dynamicalchains_graphene ] correspond to two alternative ways of choosing subgroups of @xmath442 : @xmath443{45}{$\supset$}}}$ } \ { { { \rm su(2)}}_{\sigma}}\times { { \rm su(2)}}{_{\mbox{\scriptsizep}}}\ \raisebox{-0.8ex}{${\mathbin{\rotatebox[origin = c]{-45}{$\supset$}}}$ } \\ { { \rm so(5)}}\times{{\rm su(2)}}{_{\mbox{\scriptsizep } } } \hphantom{{\mathbin{\rotatebox[origin = c]{45}{$\supset$}}}\ { { { \rm su(2)}}_{\sigma}}\times{{{\rm su(2)}}_{\tau}}{\mathbin{\rotatebox[origin = c]{-45}{$\supset$ } } } } \ \ { { { \rm su(2)}}_{\sigma}}\times { { { \rm u(1)}}_{{\scriptstyle\rm c}}}\\ \hphantom{{{\rm so(5)}}\times{{{\rm su(2)}}_{\tau}}\ } \raisebox{1.0ex}{${\mathbin{\rotatebox[origin = c]{-45}{$\supset$}}}$ } \makebox[\widthof{$\ { { { \rm su(2)}}_{\sigma}}\times{{{\rm su(2)}}_{\tau}}\ $ } ] [ c]{${{\rm so(5)}}\ \times \ { { { \rm u(1)}}_{{\scriptstyle\rm c}}}$ } \raisebox{1.0ex}{${\mathbin{\rotatebox[origin = c]{45}{$\supset$}}}$ } . \end{array } \label{so5dyn1.1}\ ] ] in the upper branch of the middle step the so(5 ) symmetry is broken to its @xmath444 spin subgroup , with @xmath289 unbroken . physically this corresponds to conservation of the spin associated with the @xmath445 angular momentum algebra and the pseudospin associated with the @xmath446 pair algebra , but not the full so(5 ) symmetry . in the lower branch of the middle step , the so(5 ) symmetry remains intact and @xmath143-pair pseudospin @xmath444 is broken to @xmath447 charge . in the final subgroup of both chains , only the spin and charge remain as conserved quantities . the hamiltonian in the @xmath448 dynamical symmetry limit corresponds to eq . ( [ mostgeneralham ] ) with the restriction that @xmath449 , @xmath450 where terms that are constant within a given representation have been omitted . the most general so(8 ) state in the @xmath177 collective subspace is given by eq . ( [ collective1.1 ] ) and corresponds to a superposition of @xmath143 and @xmath231 pairs . schematically , @xmath451 with @xmath228 and @xmath452 defined in eq . ( [ coupled1.4 ] ) and @xmath453 , where @xmath178 is the total pair number . on the other hand , the most general states corresponding to the various subgroup chains illustrated in fig . [ fig : dynamicalchains_graphene ] correspond to pair superpositions having specific constraints on the relative contribution of @xmath143 and @xmath454 pairs . the collective subspace for the @xmath455 subgroup of so(8 ) is of the form ( see eq . ( 9.13 ) of ref . @xcite ) @xmath456 implying that it is a superposition of @xmath143 pairs . conceptually , the wavefunction of the @xmath455 subgroup chain for @xmath177 is obtained from the most general state in the collective subspace by converting all of its @xmath454 pairs to @xmath143 pairs . as was seen in [ sh : coupledpairrep ] and fig . [ fig : s_d_pairs_brillouin ] , the @xmath143 and @xmath454 pairs correspond to coherent superpositions of particular electronic distributions in spin and valley pseudospin . thus , specific @xmath143 and @xmath454 pair content for so(8 ) dynamical symmetry subgroup chains implies specific collective modes associated with coherent distribution of the electrons in spin and valley space . it has been noted above that in the @xmath457 dynamical symmetry limit the ground states correspond to a superposition of @xmath143 pairs . the nature of this collective state may be inferred from fig . [ fig : s_d_pairs_brillouin ] and is illustrated in fig . [ fig : s_d_pairs_brillouin_so5 ] . the collective state corresponding to the @xmath458 ground state . the state is an antisymmetric combination of a spin density wave with spin - up on the a lattice sites and spin - down on the b sites , and a spin density wave with spin - up on the b sites and spin - down on the a sites . ] the su(4 ) dynamical symmetry corresponds to the three so(8 ) subgroup chains @xmath459 that were introduced in eqs . ( [ chains1.3])([chainy1.2 ] ) and fig . [ fig : dynamicalchains_graphene ] . as already noted , these three dynamical symmetry chains are in one to one correspondence with the explicit symmetry breaking patterns that have been identified for su(4 ) quantum hall ferromagnetism . the most general su(4 ) wavefunction for @xmath178 pairs in the @xmath177 collective so(8 ) subspace is given by @xcite @xmath460^p { |0\rangle } , \label{su4pairstate}\ ] ] which corresponds physically to a restriction of the general so(8 ) wavefunction ( [ so8pairstate ] ) to a specific superposition of @xmath143 and @xmath454 pairs . the wavefunction for the @xmath362 subgroup of su(4 ) is given by eq . ( [ so5pairstate ] ) . the wavefunction of the parent su(4 ) group is a superposition of @xmath143 and @xmath454 pairs but the @xmath448 subgroup has a wavefunction containing only @xmath143 pairs . the so(7 ) dynamical symmetry corresponds to the so(8 ) subgroup chain @xmath461 that was introduced in eq . ( [ chains1.4 ] ) and displayed in fig . [ fig : dynamicalchains_graphene ] . the hamiltonian in the so(7 ) dynamical symmetry limit corresponds to eq . ( [ mostgeneralham ] ) with the restriction that @xmath462 , @xmath463 where terms have been dropped that are constant within a given representation . from the nuclear physics analog so(8 ) symmetry @xcite , one may surmise that so(7 ) will play the role of a _ critical dynamical symmetry _ interpolating smoothly between the collective states corresponding to the @xmath411 dynamical symmetry and the collective states corresponding to @xmath398 dynamical symmetry . such critical dynamical symmetries have been discussed previously in both nuclear physics @xcite and for the strongly - correlated electrons leading to cuprate and iron - based high - temperature superconductivity @xcite . they may be viewed as the generalization of a quantum critical point to an entire _ quantum critical phase , _ and may represent a fundamental organizing principle for quantum critical behavior . the physical implications of this so(7 ) critical dynamical symmetry for graphene quantum hall physics will be discussed further below . the dynamical symmetry limits discussed above represent special solutions resulting from particular choices of the coupling parameters appearing in the hamiltonian . for arbitrary choices of the coupling parameters the solutions will correspond generally to superpositions of the different symmetry - limit solutions and will not have exact analytical forms . in this more general case it is quite feasible to obtain solutions numerically , since the collective subspace is highly truncated relative to the full hilbert space . however , there is a powerful alternative approach : the _ generalized coherent state approximation , _ which permits _ analytical solutions _ for arbitrary choices of the coupling parameters in the hamiltonian . for the so(8 ) lie algebra introduced in this paper for graphene the gilmore perelomov algorithm @xcite may be implemented to obtain solutions in terms of a set of generalized coherent states . these solutions represent the most general hartree fock bogoliubov theory that can be formulated in the space , subject to a dynamical symmetry constraint @xcite . the solutions of this symmetry - constrained hartree fock bogoliubov ( schfb ) theory correspond to determining the stable points of energy surfaces , which represent the coherent - state expectation values of the effective hamiltonian on the coset space . thus the coherent state solutions also represent a microscopically - derived implementation of ginzburg landau theory . these coherent state solutions are uniquely well suited to study the interplay of competing spontaneous symmetry breaking in determining the ground state of the system and its properties . the coherent states associated with the full set of subgroup chains in fig . [ fig : dynamicalchains_graphene ] will be discussed in future work . in this paper the power of the method will be illustrated succinctly by restricting to the coherent states associated with the subgroup chains of so(8 ) that contain the so(5 ) subgroup , as illustrated in fig . [ fig : dynamicalchains_coherentso5 ] . 0pt 0.20 subgroup chains included in the present coherent state analysis . thus the corresponding coherent state solutions will represent a superposition of the symmetry - limit solutions for the @xmath464 { { \rm so(8)}}\supset{{\rm su(4)}}\supset{{\rm so(5)}}\qquad { { \rm so(8)}}\supset{{\rm so(7)}}\supset{{\rm so(5)}}\end{array}\ ] ] dynamical symmetries . these coherent state solutions will be seen to have the following properties : 1 . the @xmath391 dynamical symmetry will play the role of a critical dynamical symmetry interpolating between @xmath411 and @xmath398 symmetry - limit solutions . because of fundamental symmetries obeyed by the wavefunction , the coherent state solutions may be parameterized in terms of a single collective parameter @xmath465 that governs the mixture of the @xmath143 and @xmath454 pairs defined in eq . ( [ coupled1.4 ] ) contributing in the ground state . the collective parameter @xmath465 may also be interpreted physically in terms of the pair configurations displayed in fig . [ fig : s_d_pairs_brillouin ] . the so(8 ) coherent states corresponding to the symmetry structure in fig . [ fig : dynamicalchains_coherentso5 ] have been developed previously in ref . @xcite for nuclear physics applications and will be adapted extensively to development of the present formalism . let us now consider the energy surfaces that may be computed from the coherent states , which link the so(8 ) solutions to ginzburg landau theory . within the coherent state formalism the ground state energy may be determined through the variational requirement @xmath466 where @xmath467 is the coherent state , @xmath468 is the so(8 ) hamiltonian , @xmath469 and the coefficients @xmath437 and @xmath470 are functions of the effective interaction . for the dynamical symmetry chains having so(5 ) as a subgroup the energies take the general form @xcite @xmath471 , \label{generalenergyformula}\ ] ] where the group - dependent parameters @xmath472 , @xmath473 , @xmath474 , @xmath475 , and @xmath476 are given in table [ tb : stiffnessparameters ] . cccccc ' '' '' g & @xmath472 & @xmath124 & @xmath477 & @xmath478 & @xmath479 + ' '' '' su(2 ) & @xmath437 & @xmath480 & @xmath481 & @xmath482 & @xmath483 + [ ] so(5 ) & @xmath484 & @xmath485 & @xmath486 & @xmath487 & @xmath488 + [ ] su(4 ) & @xmath489 & @xmath490 & @xmath491 & @xmath492 & @xmath331 + [ ] so(7 ) & @xmath438 & @xmath493 & @xmath494 & @xmath495 & @xmath496 + our primary interest in this discussion is in the ground state properties of graphene in a strong magnetic field . the ground states in the coherent state approximation at fixed @xmath497 will be given by those values of @xmath498 that correspond to minima of the energy surface @xmath499 . these are determined by the values of @xmath465 satisfying @xmath500 evaluating these constraints for the energy surfaces ( [ generalenergyformula ] ) , one finds that the minima @xmath501 are given by @xcite @xmath502 the coherent state energy surfaces for the @xmath448 , so(7 ) , and su(4 ) symmetry limits computed from eq . ( [ generalenergyformula ] ) using the entries in table [ tb : stiffnessparameters ] are shown as functions of @xmath465 for several values of the fractional occupation @xmath160 in fig . [ fig : coherentenergysurfaces_graphene ] . coherent state energy surfaces as a function of the order parameter @xmath465 for three of the so(8 ) dynamical symmetry limits . the curves are labeled by the fractional occupation @xmath503 defined in eq . ( [ fillingfraction ] ) , where @xmath17 is the particle number and @xmath147 is the maximum number of particles that can be accommodated in the landau level . the formalism is particle hole symmetric so curves for fractional occupations with @xmath504 are equivalent to those shown above , but with the fractional occupation counted in terms of number of holes . for example , the curves for @xmath505 and @xmath506 are equivalent . for the direct product group @xmath507 the energy surface is the sum of contributions to eq . ( [ generalenergyformula ] ) from su(2 ) and so(5 ) . as will be demonstrated later , the su(2 ) contribution typically dominates that of so(5 ) . ] there one sees that indeed the minima for the @xmath448 and so(7 ) limits are at @xmath508 , and the minima for the su(4 ) limit are at @xmath509 . although the minimum energies for both the @xmath448 and so(7 ) limits are consistent with @xmath510 , fig . [ fig : coherentenergysurfaces_graphene ] shows that these symmetries differ fundamentally in the localization of the minimum . for @xmath448 the energy surface has a deep minimum at @xmath510 but for so(7 ) the energy surface is very flat around @xmath508 , with a broad range of @xmath465 giving essentially the same ground state energy . this highly - degenerate so(7 ) ground state has significant physical implications that will be discussed further below . the so(8 ) generalized coherent state is equivalent to the hartree fock bogoliubov ( hfb ) approximation subject to a symmetry constraint . since hfb is a bcs - type approximation married to a hartree fock mean field , its solutions correspond to symmetry - breaking intrinsic states . in particular , the bcs - like state conserves the physical particle number only on average , and the hartree fock mean field may break both translational and rotational invariance . let us address these issues for the so(8 ) coherent state . the fractional uncertainty in electron number @xmath511 for the so(8 ) coherent state is given by @xcite @xmath512 where @xmath513 is the value of @xmath465 at the minimum energy , given by eq . ( [ betaminima ] ) in the symmetry limits . expressing eq . ( [ particlenumberfluctuation ] ) in terms of the fractional occupation @xmath514 , in the @xmath448 and su(4 ) limits , respectively , one obtains @xmath515_{{\rm so}_5\times{{\rm su(2 ) } } } \hspace{-5pt } = \sqrt{\frac{1-{f}}{{f}\omega } } \qquad \left[\frac{\delta n}{n}\right]_{{\rm su}_4 } \hspace{-5pt } = \sqrt{\frac{1 - 2{f}}{{f}\omega } } , \label{particlenumberfluctuation3}\ ] ] from these results one may notice two important things . 1 . the fluctuation in particle number is large at low degeneracy @xmath128 but decreases with increasing @xmath128 . if su(4 ) symmetry is realized @xmath516 decreases with increasing @xmath160 and _ vanishes identically _ at @xmath167 for any @xmath128 , which corresponds to the fractional occupation for the ground state of undoped graphene . thus it is expected that the current theory applied to graphene has negligible particle number fluctuation @xmath516 in the su(4 ) limit . in the @xmath448 limit the particle number fluctuation @xmath516 remains finite for all @xmath160 but it becomes very small as @xmath128 becomes large , particularly near @xmath517 . thus it too may be neglected in the large-@xmath128 limit . comparison with table [ tb : degeneracytable ] suggests that graphene quantum hall experiments involve sufficient degeneracy that particle number fluctuation in the coherent state solution is not significant . the coherent state approximation represents a mean field localized in spatial position and orientation , so it violates translational and rotational invariance . however , because the crystal is generally macroscopic , the net violation of these symmetries may be expected to be negligible . one concludes that for applications of coherent state methods to graphene , violations of particle number conservation , rotational invariance , and translational invariance are negligible in realistic systems . the generalized coherent state method has been used above to calculate total energy surfaces for quantum hall states in graphene , but one also may use the coherent state wavefunctions and appropriate operators to calculate matrix elements of other relevant observables . this section addresses the nature of the wavefunction and the matrix elements that can serve as order parameters . a significant consequence of the so(8 ) dynamical symmetry structure displayed in fig . [ fig : dynamicalchains_coherentso5 ] is that the phases may be distinguished in terms of a single order parameter and its fluctuations , which may be taken to be @xmath465 . let us now characterize in more depth the physical meaning of this order parameter . in [ sh : orderparameters ] an antiferromagnetic order parameter @xmath329 was defined . in the coherent state approximation the onset of af order is signaled by an energy - surface minimum at a finite value of @xmath465 . because @xmath518 [ see eq . ( [ ngx9 ] ) ] , the antiferromagnetic order parameter @xmath329 is related to the coherent state af order parameter @xmath465 by the intrinsic state matrix element of @xmath519 @xcite @xmath520 where @xmath489 is the coupling strength for the @xmath521 term in the hamiltonian . each value of @xmath465 corresponds to a unique value of @xmath329 , so @xmath465 is a measure of antiferromagnetic order . the location of the maxima may be obtained by setting the derivative with respect to @xmath465 of eq . ( [ intrinsic1.1 ] ) equal to zero , which yields that @xmath522 for a given @xmath17 occurs at a @xmath465 of @xmath523 where eq . ( [ betaminima ] ) was used to make the identification in the last step . thus , if @xmath524 the maximum value of @xmath329 maps to a value of @xmath465 that corresponds to a minimum of the energy surface ( a ground state ) in the su(4 ) limit . substituting eq . ( [ betaminima ] ) for @xmath465 in eq . ( [ intrinsic1.1 ] ) , for @xmath524 ground states the af order parameter @xmath329 depends on the electron number @xmath17 as @xmath525 the so(8 ) model is particle hole symmetric so @xmath17 or @xmath526 count electrons up to half filling and holes for greater than half filling . hence the maximum af collectivity occurs for half filling of the single valence landau level . as was discussed in [ h : conservationlaws ] , the coherent state wavefunction corresponding physically to @xmath527 pairs conserves particle number only on average and so is a superposition of terms having different numbers of pairs . in eq . ( 5.27 ) of ref . @xcite the so(8 ) coherent state is decomposed into terms of definite pair number @xmath528 according to @xmath529 where @xmath530 denotes an intrinsic state with order parameter @xmath465 and closed forms for @xmath531 and @xmath532 are given in ref . @xcite . according to eq . ( 5.28 ) of ref . @xcite , the values of @xmath533 that correspond to the minima of the potential energy surface at @xmath534 for the @xmath448 limit and @xmath535 for the @xmath411 limit [ see eq . ( [ betaminima ] ) ] , respectively , are @xmath536 so the so(8 ) coherent state wavefunction ( [ coherentfn1.1 ] ) in the @xmath448 and su(4 ) limits , respectively , becomes @xmath537 \displaystyle { |{\rm su}_4\rangle } = \sum _ { p } { c_p}\left ( s^\dagger \pm d_0^\dagger \right)^p { |0\rangle } = 2\sum _ { p } { c_p}\left ( q_\pm^\dagger \right)^p { |0\rangle } , \end{array } \label{coherentfn1.4}\ ] ] where eq . ( [ qdef ] ) was used . as discussed in [ h : conservationlaws ] , fluctuations in particle number are negligible in the large-@xmath128 limit for so(8 ) coherent states , implying that the summations in eqs . ( [ coherentfn1.4 ] ) become dominated by terms with @xmath538 . thus for large @xmath128 the coherent state wavefunctions are well approximated up to a normalization by @xmath539 [ largeomegwf ] as seen from table [ tb : orderparms ] , the su(4 ) state of eq . ( [ largeomegwf.b ] ) is a coherent superposition of @xmath540 or @xmath541 pairs , each contributing vanishing ferromagnetic order @xmath327 and charge density wave order @xmath328 , but non - zero af order @xmath329 . conversely , the @xmath448 state of eq . ( [ largeomegwf.a ] ) is a coherent superposition of @xmath143 pairs , each with vanishing @xmath327 , @xmath328 , and @xmath329 . thus the @xmath448 and su(4 ) limits of the so(8 ) symmetry are distinguished by the order parameter @xmath329 , which is zero in the @xmath448 state and is non - zero in the su(4 ) state . equivalently , the coherent state order parameter @xmath465 vanishes in the pure @xmath448 limit and is equal to @xmath542 in the pure su(4 ) limit [ see eq . ( [ betaminima ] ) and fig . [ fig : coherentenergysurfaces_graphene ] ] . equation ( [ generalenergyformula ] ) depends only on even powers of @xmath465 so the sign for the two possible spontaneously broken symmetry solutions does not affect the energy . for undoped graphene the fermi surface corresponds to the @xmath543 curves of fig . [ fig : coherentenergysurfaces_graphene ] . these are shown in fig . [ fig : coherentenergysurfaces_graphenegs ] for the @xmath448 , so(7 ) , and su(4 ) limits . ground - state energy surfaces in coherent state approximation for three of the so(8 ) dynamical symmetry limits . ( a ) the @xmath448 limit . ( b ) the so(7 ) limit . ( c ) the su(4 ) limit . the diagrams indicate schematically the corresponding wavefunctions , as suggested by eqs . ( [ coherentfn1.1])([largeomegwf ] ) and fig . [ fig : s_d_pairs_brillouin ] . ] * the @xmath448 limit in fig . [ fig : coherentenergysurfaces_graphenegs](a ) has its minimum @xmath513 at @xmath544 . it corresponds to states of the form ( [ largeomegwf.a ] ) , with vanishing expectation values of @xmath545 , @xmath70 , and @xmath546 . * the su(4 ) limit of fig . [ fig : coherentenergysurfaces_graphenegs](c ) corresponds to states of the form ( [ largeomegwf.b ] ) , with minima located at @xmath547 when the symmetry is broken spontaneously by choosing one of these possibilities ( they are equivalent since the energy depends only on even powers of @xmath465 ) , the resulting state has @xmath548 ( no spin or isospin order ) , but @xmath549 ( spin density wave or af order ) . * the so(7 ) limit of fig . [ fig : coherentenergysurfaces_graphenegs](b ) corresponds to a critical dynamical symmetry that interpolates between the @xmath448 and su(4 ) states through critical fluctuations in the antiferromagnetic order . thus the so(8 ) dynamical symmetry limits illustrated in fig . [ fig : coherentenergysurfaces_graphenegs ] represent a rich set of collective states that can be distinguished by the expectation value and fluctuations associated with the order parameter @xmath465 . the so(8 ) coherent state solution can be used to study transitions among the phases defined in fig . [ fig : coherentenergysurfaces_graphenegs ] . for the @xmath177 space ( no broken pairs ) assumed here , @xmath550 yields a constant that is neglected and eq . ( [ coherent1.12 ] ) may be expressed as @xmath551 the last two terms yield constants when evaluated in a given representation , and @xmath552 is found to contribute negligibly to the total energy compared with @xmath553 . therefore , it will be instructive to set @xmath554 and study the approximate so(8 ) hamiltonian @xmath555 from eqs . ( [ casimir_so5])([casimir_so8 ] ) , one finds that @xmath556 { \langles^\dagger s\rangle } + { \langle p^2{\hspace{-0.1em}\cdot\hspace{-0.1em}}p^2\rangle } \sim { \langle{c_{\scriptscriptstyle{{\rm so(7)}}}}\rangle } \end{array}\ ] ] if constants are neglected . thus the model hamiltonian ( [ modelhamiltonian ] ) may be tuned to favor the @xmath448 , so(7 ) , or su(4 ) phases by varying the ratio of the coupling parameters @xmath437 and @xmath489 . to study the quantum phase transitions of the so(8 ) model with the approximate hamiltonian ( [ modelhamiltonian ] ) , it is convenient to define a parameter @xmath557 and to rewrite eq . ( [ modelhamiltonian ] ) as @xmath558 thus the value of @xmath559 tunes the hamiltonian ( [ modelhamiltonian2 ] ) between @xmath507 and su(4 ) phases via an intermediate so(7 ) phase exhibiting quantum critical behavior . 1 . if @xmath560 the ground - state energy surface is approximated by fig . [ fig : coherentenergysurfaces_graphenegs](a ) , with a minimum at @xmath544 , no antiferromagnetic order , and @xmath507 symmetry . 2 . if @xmath561 the ground - state energy surface is approximated by fig . [ fig : coherentenergysurfaces_graphenegs](c ) , with an energy minimum at @xmath562 implying @xmath411 symmetry and antiferromagnetic order . 3 . if @xmath563 , the ground - state energy surface is approximated by fig . [ fig : coherentenergysurfaces_graphenegs](b ) and the system exhibits so(7 ) critical dynamical symmetry , with large fluctuations in the af order parameter @xmath465 . let us now use the hamiltonian ( [ modelhamiltonian2 ] ) to study the quantum phase transitions and spontaneously broken symmetry of the so(8 ) model . if terms involving @xmath564 and @xmath565 are ignored ( as justified above ) , eq . ( [ generalenergyformula ] ) with the parameters in table [ tb : stiffnessparameters ] imply that @xmath566 hence the energy surfaces corresponding to the hamiltonian ( [ modelhamiltonian2 ] ) may be expressed as @xmath567 the variation of the energy surface computed from eq . ( [ coherent1.13d ] ) with the control parameter @xmath568 for half filling ( ground state for undoped graphene ) is shown in fig . [ fig : coherentenergysurfaces_control2d ] ; quantum phase transitions with coupling strength as control parameter : coherent state energy surface as a function of the control parameter @xmath569 for a degeneracy parameter @xmath570 and a fractional occupation @xmath571 . the solid green curves from @xmath572 correspond to approximate @xmath448 symmetry , the solid blue curves for @xmath573 correspond to approximate su(4 ) symmetry . the dashed red curves near @xmath563 correspond to an approximate so(7 ) symmetry mediating the quantum phase transition from @xmath448 to su(4 ) symmetry . ] by tuning the control parameter from @xmath574 to @xmath561 , one sees that the system undergoes a quantum phase transition near @xmath575 from an approximate @xmath457 state with energy minimum at @xmath534 [ see fig . [ fig : coherentenergysurfaces_graphenegs](a ) ] to an approximate su(4 ) state having energy minima at @xmath576 [ see fig . [ fig : coherentenergysurfaces_graphenegs](c ) and eq . ( [ betaminima ] ) ] . for @xmath563 the system has an approximate so(7 ) dynamical symmetry [ see fig . [ fig : coherentenergysurfaces_graphenegs](b ) ] , with no well - defined minimum for the energy as a function of @xmath465 , but with large fluctuations in @xmath465 implied by a highly - degenerate ground state . for fixed values of the coupling parameters @xmath437 and @xmath489 , phase transitions may be mediated by changing the particle occupancy . [ fig : coherentenergysurfaces_vs_n_2d ] illustrates for different values of @xmath497 at fixed @xmath577 . one sees that as the particle number is increased the system makes a transition from approximate @xmath448 symmetry with @xmath534 to su(4 ) symmetry with @xmath524 through a critical so(7 ) symmetry for which the energy is highly degenerate in @xmath465 . in the coherent state approximation the dynamical symmetry structure of fig . [ fig : dynamicalchains_coherentso5 ] has been examined and not the full group structure given in fig . [ fig : dynamicalchains_graphene ] . for the group chains that contain the so(5 ) subgroup , the only physical implication is to omit the physical effect of zeeman splitting from dynamical symmetry hamiltonian [ which would break the so(5 ) subgroup down into a u(1 ) subgroup generated by the @xmath58 component of the physical spin ] . our primary concern in this discussion is the structure associated with the @xmath5 landau level , for which the effect of the zeeman term is expected to be small ( see [ h : applicationsgraphene ] ) . thus , one may view the effect of the zeeman term as a perturbation on the results obtained thus far that will act only on the spin part of the wavefunction . as kharitonov @xcite has already discussed , the competition of the zeeman term with the valley interactions will convert the antiferromagnetic solution into a canted antiferromagnetic solution . quantum phase transitions with particle number as control parameter : coherent state energy surfaces for different filling fraction @xmath578 at fixed values for @xmath437 and @xmath489 with @xmath579 . the solid green curves for @xmath580 correspond to approximate @xmath448 symmetry , the solid blue curves for @xmath581 correspond to approximate su(4 ) symmetry . curves near @xmath582 ( dashed red ) correspond to an approximate so(7 ) symmetry mediating the quantum phase transition from @xmath448 to su(4 ) symmetry . ] placing a strong magnetic field on graphene leads to high level degeneracy at energies corresponding to the quantized landau levels . in general , interacting electronic systems with high level degeneracy near the fermi surface can produce ( even for relatively weak interactions ) a rich variety of collective states that differ qualitatively from the non - interacting ground state . these states correspond to a spontaneous breaking of the symmetry and generally can not be obtained through small perturbations of the weakly - interacting ground state since they are emergent in nature . the su(4 ) symmetry of quantum hall ferromagnetism gives rise to a ground state symmetry reflected in the su(4)-symmetric hamiltonian ( [ so5_1.1a ] ) and a possible symmetry breaking structure that has been outlined in [ h : symmetriesfqhegraphene ] . however , the symmetry - breaking patterns illustrated in fig . [ fig : dynamicalchains_qhf ] represents _ perturbations around the symmetric ground state ( explicit symmetry breaking ) . _ they can not capture the nature of these possible spontaneously - broken symmetry states , since the broken - symmetry states may differ fundamentally from the possible states in fig . [ fig : dynamicalchains_qhf ] : the states corresponding to the most general linear combination ( [ upairs1.8 ] ) represent a complex superposition of many su(4)-symmetric components and generally can not be classified by pure or any simple linear combination of su(4 ) irreducible representations . since the nature of the broken symmetry states can not be studied directly within the su(4 ) framework because they are unlikely to be anywhere near eigenstates of an su(4)-symmetric hamiltonian , the broken - symmetry states have typically been studied numerically , or by effective field theory methods . however , as has been shown , the kinds of collective configurations that have been proposed as candidates for low - lying broken - symmetry states in graphene ( see fig . [ fig : s_d_pairs_brillouin ] and @xcite ) bear strong resemblance to _ eigenstates _ of so(8 ) dynamical symmetry chains . thus , the present so(8 ) symmetry holds the promise of providing _ analytical _ solutions for possible broken - symmetry states in graphene . this is the most important result of the present paper . at specific filling factors the ground state of graphene will be determined by the competition among the su(4 ) symmetry breaking terms . the most obvious su(4)-anisotropic effect is the zeeman term , which favors a spin - polarized state , but the graphene sublattice structure introduces additional interactions that favor ground states without spin polarization that are characterized by spin density wave or charge density wave order at the lattice scale . the competition between zeeman - term spin polarization and the lattice - scale polarizations can be studied by changing the in - plane component of the magnetic field relative to the perpendicular component , since this changes the zeeman energy but not the orbital energies @xcite . such studies indicate that for the higher - energy landau levels the zeeman term is dominant , producing spin ferromagnets that have skyrmionic excitations at half filling , but in the @xmath5 landau level the lattice - scale interactions dominate the zeeman interaction and drive the system into a spin - unpolarized state @xcite . the remainder of this discussion will concentrate on these spin - unpolarized collective states that are candidates for the ground state in the @xmath5 landau level for charge - neutral graphene , with the zeeman interaction viewed as a perturbation on a collective structure that is dominated by lattice - scale interactions . consideration in this paper will be restricted further to those states that can arise from the dynamical symmetries of fig . [ fig : dynamicalchains_graphene ] that contain the so(5 ) subgroup ( those displayed in fig . [ fig : dynamicalchains_coherentso5 ] ) . it has been shown that so(8 ) describes analytically a number of spontaneously - broken - su(4 ) candidates for the states observed in modern experiments such as those described in refs . these solutions provide a spectrum of excited states as well as ground states . the excited states will not be discussed here , except to note that all ground state solutions have a gap to electronic and collective excitations and so correspond to incompressible states . the general theory to be discussed in forthcoming papers can accommodate fm , cdw , and af states , but for the dynamical symmetries containing so(5 ) that were the focus here , all solutions may be classified by a _ single parameter _ @xmath465 measuring af order : su(4 ) states have finite af order but no cdw or fm order , @xmath448 states have no af , cdw , or fm order , and so(7 ) states correspond to a critical dynamical symmetry interpolating between su(4 ) and @xmath448 with large af fluctuations but no static af order , and with no cdw or fm order . in a strong magnetic field the zero - energy state of graphene has four - fold spin and valley degeneracy per landau level , and ( neglecting the lattice - scale interactions ) near the sample boundary one might expect the zero landau level to split into one positively - dispersing ( electron - like ) and one negatively dispersing ( hole - like ) mode for each spin projection . this would suggest a ground state having a bulk energy gap at charge neutrality but with electron - like and hole - like states of opposite spin polarization crossing at the edge of the sample ( with the edge - state structure being analogous to the quantum spin hall effect ) @xcite . however , experiments indicate that the ground state of charge - neutral graphene becomes _ strongly insulating _ at high magnetic fields @xcite . the detailed nature of this state remains uncertain , but it is generally expected to correspond to a spontaneously broken symmetry caused by the strong coulomb interactions among the electrons in the zero landau level . transport properties are not manifest in the algebraic solutions presented here but the coherent state approximation is equivalent to symmetry - constrained hartree fock bogoliubov ( hfb ) theory @xcite , suggesting that so(8 ) theory can be mapped onto hartree fock ( hf ) transport calculations . hf calculations for armchair nanoribbons found that af and cdw states similar to ours have no edge currents @xcite . it may be speculated that our af states also are insulating and thus strong candidates for the high - field ground state , but confirmation requires more work . solutions depend on @xmath437 and @xmath489 in eq . ( [ modelhamiltonian ] ) , which define effective interactions in the truncated space [ highly renormalized relative to parameters in eq . ( [ so5_1.1a ] ) ] . they may be fixed by systematic comparison with data , enabling a robust prediction for the nature of the ground and other low - energy states . one expects modest impurity levels to modify the effective interaction parameters but to leave dynamical symmetries intact . a unified model of conventional superconductivity and high - temperature superconductors having an @xmath385 highest symmetry has been proposed @xcite . for sufficiently strong on - site coulomb repulsion ( true for the cuprates and approximately true for the fe - based compounds ) , the most general so(8 ) symmetry is reduced to its su(4 ) subgroup @xcite , which forms the basis of an su(4 ) dynamical symmetry model of high - temperature superconductivity . this su(4 ) model has three dynamical symmetry subchains ending in an @xmath583 subgroup representing conservation of spin and charge . physically , these su(4 ) subgroup chains represent 1 . an su(2 ) pseudospin subgroup chain that describes a @xmath584-wave singlet superconductor ( sc ) . an so(4 ) subgroup chain that describes an antiferromagnetic mott insulator ( af ) . an so(5 ) subgroup chain representing a critical dynamical symmetry that is soft with respect to af and sc fluctuations and interpolates between the af and sc collective modes . thus , in the su(4 ) model of high-@xmath585 superconductivity the so(5 ) subgroup chain plays a similar physical role as the so(7 ) subgroup chain of the graphene so(8 ) dynamical symmetry model and the so(7 ) subgroup chain of the nuclear so(8 ) model . in all three cases the subgroup chains represent the generalization of a quantum critical point to an entire quantum critical phase that exhibits large fluctuations ( in order - parameter space ) connecting collective modes defined by other dynamical symmetries of the problem . in the high-@xmath585 case the modes connected by the @xmath586 critical dynamical symmetry are antiferromagnetism and superconductivity , in graphene the critical @xmath587 dynamical symmetry connects states with and without to nel ( af ) order , and in the nuclear structure case the critical @xmath587 dynamical symmetry connects collective states that differ in the relative contributions of nucleon pairs carrying total angular momentum 0 and total angular momentum 2 . thus physically these three applications of dynamical symmetry have little in common , but one sees that mathematically they have a deep similarity . although the microscopic physics differs fundamentally , at the level of the observed emergent collective modes in the system one sees that graphene quantum hall states , high - temperature superconductors , and broad classes of nuclear collective states have a unified description in terms of dynamical symmetries associated with very similar compact lie algebras . this remarkable similarity is illustrated in fig . [ fig : nuc_sc_graphene_chains ] the well - known quantum hall ferromagnetic su(4 ) symmetry of graphene in strong magnetic fields has been extended by adding to the particle hole operators that generate su(4 ) a set of six creation and six annihilation operators that create or destroy fermion pairs in either a total valley isospin triplet , total spin singlet state , or a total valley isospin singlet , total spin triplet state ( the only possibilities allowed by the pauli principle ) . this extended set of operators is shown to close an so(8 ) algebra under commutation , which is formally analogous to the so(8 ) algebra of the fermion dynamical symmetry model of nuclear structure physics . this permits immediate adaptation of mathematical tools developed in nuclear physics to the graphene problem . the previously - known su(4 ) quantum hall ferromagnetism symmetry is recovered as one subgroup , but one finds a richer set of low - energy collective modes associated with the full subgroup structure of so(8 ) . by exploiting the established methodology of fermion dynamical symmetries , it was possible to decouple a collective - pair subspace from the full hilbert space of the problem , permitting exact , analytical , many - body solutions to be obtained in several physically - interesting limits . in addition to exact solutions in specific dynamical symmetry limits , a generalized so(8 ) coherent state approximation has been introduced that permits a broad range of solutions to be obtained even when not in the dynamical symmetry limits . the pairs spanning the collective subspace are shown to be analogous to pairs that have already been discussed at a qualitative level in the graphene literature as defining the possible broken symmetry ground states in the presence of strong electron electron and electron phonon correlations in the @xmath5 landau level . the development here places these pairs on a firm , unified mathematical footing and permits analytical solutions to be developed that explore the possible collective states that previously required numerical simulation for their quantitative description . finally , it has been shown that there are uncanny dynamical symmetry analogies among broken symmetry states for graphene in a strong magnetic field , high temperature superconductors , and strongly collective states in atomic nuclei . on the one hand this has the practical utility of allowing technology already developed in one field to be adapted easily to another . on the other hand , it implies a deep and intriguing mathematical affinity among physical problems that are not usually viewed as having more than a superficial connection . _ acknowledgments._* * this work is supported by the basque government ( grant no . it472 - 10 ) , the spanish micinn ( project no . fis2012 - 36673-c03 - 03 ) , and the basque country university ufi ( project 11/55 - 01 - 2013 ) . partial support was provided by lightcone interactive llc . the formalism discussed in this paper was introduced by postulating a set of physical operators that were shown explicitly to generate an so(8 ) lie algebra under commutation . it is illuminating to consider a somewhat different perspective on the motivation for introducing an so(8 ) symmetry for the graphene problem . it is well known that in a fermionic space having @xmath275 degrees of freedom the most general set of bilinear products @xmath588 of creation annihilation operators and their hermitian conjugates generates an su(@xmath275 ) lie algebra under commutation @xcite . ( physically , the restriction to bilinear products corresponds to limiting consideration to two - body interactions . ) likewise , it is well known that adding to this particle hole operator set the most general pair creation and annihilation operators @xmath589 and @xmath590 extends the su(@xmath275 ) algebra to so(@xmath591 ) . this extension is useful because sometimes more is less . the advantage of expanding the space from su(@xmath275 ) , with @xmath592 generators , to so(@xmath591 ) , with @xmath593 generators , is that the added pair operators permit the definition of a ( collective ) subspace of the full hilbert space spanned by the products of pair creation operators acting on the pair vacuum . if an effective hamiltonian is then constructed by writing the most general polynomial in the casimir invariants of all groups in the subgroup chains of the highest symmetry so(@xmath591 ) ( restricted to quadratic casimir invariants if one considers only two - body interactions ) , it will correspond to the most general hamiltonian that can be written in the collective subspace , and will be diagonal in the collective subspace basis for specific dynamical symmetry subgroup chains . thus , the schrdinger equation can be solved analytically in the symmetry limits defined by each dynamical symmetry subgroup chain , and even away from the symmetry limits it can be solved analytically in coherent - state approximation . the su(@xmath275 ) particle hole algebra alone can be used to construct a hamiltonian that commutes with its generators , and the corresponding schrdinger equation can be solved analytically . but when one considers the realistic case of adding symmetry - breaking terms to the hamiltonian that do not commute with the generators of su(@xmath275 ) , the best that can be done analytically is to assume that these terms are small and that the physical solutions can be treated as small perturbations around the symmetric solution . for the non - perturbative case where the added terms lead to spontaneously broken symmetry and new possible ground states that are not connected perturbatively to the symmetric ground state , one has no systematic way to construct the new ground state from the symmetric one except to guess it . but since the su(@xmath275)-symmetric solution is not connected analytically to non - perturbative broken symmetry solutions , the symmetries of the unperturbed ground state could be a poor guide to guessing the nature of the broken - symmetry states and one must rely on numerical solutions or other approximations and not symmetry to determine their properties . let us now apply this general discussion to quantum hall magnetism in graphene . as discussed in [ h : symmetriesfqhegraphene ] , it is widely accepted that an approximate su(@xmath275 ) particle hole symmetry with @xmath594 is relevant in the @xmath5 landau level because the dominant long - range coulomb interaction is su(4)-symmetric . however , the short - range terms that break this symmetry in the effective hamiltonian prevent the su(4 ) symmetry from providing a solution for the broken symmetry ground state , unless it is assumed that those terms only perturb the su(4)-symmetric solution ( small explicit symmetry breaking ) . but experimental evidence suggests that the true ground state of graphene in a strong magnetic field at low temperature breaks su(4 ) symmetry _ spontaneously , not explicitly _ ( see the introduction ) , and therefore is produced by a non - perturbative effect that can not be explained in terms of small fluctuations around the su(4)-symmetric solution . the possible ( spontaneously ) broken - symmetry states for the @xmath5 landau level have been described in terms of the most general sets of electron pairs occupying the two valley isospin and two spin degrees of freedom @xcite , @xmath595 { |0\rangle } , \label{basis1.0}\ ] ] where the vacuum state @xmath239 corresponds to completely filled landau levels for @xmath596 and completely empty landau levels for @xmath597 . each factor in the product @xmath598 creates a pair of electrons in the state @xmath599 at orbital @xmath600 of the @xmath5 ll , with @xmath601 equal to sublattice a or b , @xmath211 equal to spin up or down , and with the valley isospin and sublattice pseudospin identified : @xmath602 and @xmath603 . but the pair creation operators @xmath215 in eq . ( [ basis1.0 ] ) and their hermitian conjugates are not generators of su(4 ) and do not commute with the su(4)-symmetric hamiltonian , and the collective states of the form ( [ basis1.0 ] ) that are of interest in the present context are unlikely to represent small fluctuations around the su(4)-symmetric solution . thus the nature of these collective states is not determined by the su(4 ) symmetry and had to be investigated by numerical calculations using a small basis in prior work @xcite . on the other hand , the so(8 ) pair generators introduced in eq . ( [ coupled1.4 ] ) are included in the most general collective pairs generated by the @xmath604 operators in eq . ( [ basis1.0 ] ) , and include the collective degrees of freedom discussed in ref . @xcite ( see [ sh : otherstates ] and fig . [ fig : s_d_pairs_brillouin ] ) . thus , the so(8 ) fermion dynamical symmetry permits the nature of possible spontaneously broken symmetries to be investigated in terms of _ symmetry properties _ that permit analytical solutions for the broken - symmetry states . hence , the formalism described in this paper may also be introduced by the following logic . the su(4 ) particle hole symmetry generated by the operators @xmath125 defined in eq . ( [ algebra1.2 ] ) is known to provide a good starting point for graphene quantum hall states dominated by the long - range coulomb interaction , but does not describe quantitatively the broken - symmetry modes discussed by kharitonov @xcite in terms of collective pairs resulting from short - range correlations . motivated by the preceding discussion in this appendix , the su(4 ) generator set may be extended to include the possible pair creation and pair annihilation operators operating in the space corresponding to the indices in the su(4 ) basis . by the general su(@xmath275 ) @xmath605 so(@xmath591 ) extension discussed above , this gives the so(8 ) lie algebra of eq . ( [ algebra1.3 ] ) . hence , expanding the algebra from su(4 ) to so(8 ) introduces the capability to explore _ analytically _ the possible collective states following from perturbation of the su(4 ) quantum hall ferromagnet by short - range interactions that break su(4 ) both explicitly and spontaneously . this appendix collects some useful transformations among the several bases that have been employed in this paper . for brevity , in the following @xmath606 will be termed the nuclear so(8 ) basis and @xmath607 will be termed the graphene so(8 ) basis . in transforming from the nuclear so(8 ) basis to the graphene so(8 ) basis the particle number ( charge ) operator @xmath17 or @xmath266 and the 12 pairing operators @xmath608 are retained , but the 15 su(4 ) generators @xmath609 in the nuclear representation are replaced with the 15 su(4 ) generators @xmath610 defined in the graphene representation of eq . ( [ algebra1.4 ] ) . the explicit transformation from the @xmath611 generators to the @xmath612 generators is given by @xmath613 \label{ngx10 } \\ { \pi_{yx } } & = \tfrac{i}{2}\left [ \sqrt{\tfrac{2}{5 } } p^3_{-3 } + p^3_3 \right . \nonumber \\ & \left . + \sqrt{\tfrac{2}{5}}\left(p^1_{-1 } + p^1_1\right ) - \sqrt{\tfrac{3}{5}}\left(p^3_1 + p^3_{-1}\right)\right ] \label{ngx11 } \\ { \pi_{zx } } & = -\tfrac{1}{\sqrt2 } \left ( p^3_2 + p^3_{-2}\right ) \label{ngx12 } \\ { \pi_{xy } } & = \tfrac{i}{2}\left[\sqrt{\tfrac{2}{5 } } p^3_{-3 } + p^3_3 \right . \nonumber \\ & \left.- \sqrt{\tfrac{2}{5}}\left(p^1_{-1 } + p^1_1\right ) + \sqrt{\tfrac{3}{5}}\left(p^3_1 + p^3_{-1}\right)\right ] \label{ngx13 } \\ { \pi_{yy } } & = \tfrac{1}{2}\left [ \vphantom{\sqrt{\tfrac{2}{5 } } } -p^3_{-3 } + p^3_3 \right . \nonumber \\ & \left.- \sqrt{\tfrac{2}{5}}\left(p^1_1 - p^1_{-1}\right ) + \sqrt{\tfrac{3}{5}}\left(p^3_1 - p^3_{-1}\right)\right ] \label{ngx14 } \\ { \pi_{zy } } & = -\tfrac{i}{\sqrt2 } \left ( p^3_2 - p^3_{-2}\right ) \label{ngx15}\end{aligned}\ ] ] in eqs . ( [ algebra1.8])([algebra1.11 ] ) the graphene basis @xmath137 has been expressed in terms of the generators @xmath125 defined in eq . ( [ algebra1.2 ] ) . the inverse transformations giving the @xmath125 in terms of the @xmath614 are where the unlisted operators may be obtained from @xmath616 and the diagonal operators have been assumed to obey the u(4 ) constraint @xmath617 with @xmath618 the total particle number and @xmath128 the total pair degeneracy given by eq . ( [ degen1.2 ] ) . since from eq . ( [ orderp1.1 ] ) the order parameters for the quantum hall ground states are functions of the expectation values for the number operators @xmath619 specifying the population of the four basis states in table [ tb : quantumnumbermapping ] and fig . [ fig : graphenebasis ] labeled by the index @xmath100 , it is useful to have explicit expressions for them in terms of the @xmath260 operators . these are @xmath620 n_2 & = \tfrac14 n + \tfrac{\sqrt5}{10}p^1_0 - \tfrac12 p^2_0 - \tfrac{3\sqrt5}{10}p^3_0 \label{ptoi2 } \\[2pt ] n_3 & = \tfrac14 n - \tfrac{\sqrt5}{10}p^1_0 -\tfrac12 p^2_0 + \tfrac{3\sqrt5}{10}p^3_0 \label{ptoi3 } \\[2pt ] n_4 & = \tfrac14 n - \tfrac{3\sqrt5}{10}p^1_0 + \tfrac12 p^2_0 -\tfrac{\sqrt5}{10}p^3_0\end{aligned}\ ] ] f. t. arecchi , e courtens , r. gilmore , and h. thomas , phys . * a6 * , 2211 ( 1972 ) . r. gilmore , ann . phys . * 74 * , 391 ( 1972 ) . a. m. perelomov , commun . * 26 * , 222 ( 1972 ) . r. gilmore , rev . de fisica * 23 * , 143 ( 1974 ) . zhang , d. h. feng , and r. gilmore , _ rev . mod.phys._ * 62 * , 867 ( 1990 ) . a. f. young , c. r. dean , l. wang , h. ren , p. cadden - zimansky , k. watanabe , t. taniguchi , j. hone , k. l. shepard and p. kim nature physics * 8 * , 550556 ( 2012 ) . Abstract:

Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.

Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered . Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video . Paper: mixture models are common tools in statistical pattern recognition @xcite . they offer a mathematical basis to explain data in fields as diverse as astronomy , biology , ecology , engineering , and economics , amongst many others @xcite . a mixture model is composed of component probabilistic models ; a component may variously correspond to a subtype , kind , species , or subpopulation of the observed data . these models aid in the identification of hidden patterns in the data through sound probabilistic formalisms . mixture models have been extensively used in machine learning tasks such as classification and unsupervised learning @xcite . formally , mixture modelling involves representing a distribution of data as a weighted sum of individual probability distributions . specifically , the problem we consider here is to model the observed data using a mixture @xmath0 of probability distributions of the form : @xmath1 where @xmath2 is a @xmath3-dimensional datum , @xmath4 is the number of mixture components , @xmath5 and @xmath6 are the weight and probability density of the @xmath7 component respectively ; the weights are positive and sum to one . the problem of modelling some observed data using a mixture distribution involves determining the number of components , @xmath4 , and estimating the mixture parameters . inferring the optimal number of mixture components involves the difficult problem of balancing the trade - off between two conflicting objectives : low _ hypothesis complexity _ as determined by the number of components _ and _ their respective parameters , versus good quality of _ fit _ to the observed data . generally a hypothesis with more free parameters can fit observed data better than a hypothesis with fewer free parameters . a number of strategies have been used to control this balance as discussed in section [ sec : mixture_existing_methods ] . these methods provide varied formulations to assess the mixture components and their ability to explain the data . methods using the minimum message length criterion @xcite , a bayesian method of inductive inference , have been proved to be effective in achieving a reliable balance between these conflicting aims @xcite . although much of the literature concerns the theory and application of gaussian mixtures @xcite , mixture modelling using other probability distributions has been widely used . some examples are : poisson models @xcite , exponential mixtures @xcite , laplace @xcite , t - distribution @xcite , weibull @xcite , kent @xcite , von mises - fisher @xcite , and many more . @xcite provide a comprehensive summary of finite mixture models and their variations . the use of gaussian mixtures in several research disciplines has been partly motivated by its computational tractability @xcite . for datasets where the _ direction _ of the constituent vectors is important , gaussian mixtures are inappropriate and distributions such as the von mises - fisher may be used @xcite . in any case , whatever the kind of distribution used for an individual component , one needs to estimate the parameters of the mixture , and provide a sound justification for selecting the appropriate number of mixture components . software for mixture modelling relies on the following elements : 1 . an _ estimator _ of the parameters of each component of a mixture , 2 . an _ objective function _ , that is a cost or score , that can be used to compare two hypothetical mixtures and decide which is better , and 3 . a _ search strategy _ for the best number of components and their weights . traditionally , parameter estimation is done by strategies such as maximum likelihood ( ml ) or bayesian maximum _ a posteriori _ probability ( map ) estimation . in this work , we use the bayesian minimum message length ( mml ) principle . unlike map , mml estimators are invariant under non - linear transformations of the data @xcite , and unlike ml , mml considers the number and precision of a model s parameters . it has been used in the inference of several probability distributions @xcite . mml - based inference operates by considering the problem as encoding first the parameter estimates and then the data given those estimates . the parameter values that result in the least _ overall _ message length to explain the whole data are taken as the mml estimates for an inference problem . the mml scheme thus incorporates the cost of stating parameters into model selection . it is self evident that a continuous parameter value can only be stated to some finite precision ; the cost of encoding a parameter is determined by its prior and the precision . ml estimation ignores the cost of stating a parameter and map based estimation uses the probability _ density _ of a parameter instead of its probability measure . in contrast , the mml inference process calculates the optimal precision to which parameters should be stated and a probability value of the corresponding parameters is then computed . this is used in the computation of the message length corresponding to the parameter estimates . thus , models with varying parameters are evaluated based on their resultant total message lengths . we use this characteristic property of mml to evaluate mixtures containing different numbers of components . although there have been several attempts to address the challenges of mixture modelling , the existing methods are shown to have some limitations in their formalisms ( see section [ sec : mixture_existing_methods ] ) . in particular , some methods based on mml are incomplete in their formulation . we aim to rectify these drawbacks by proposing a comprehensive mml formulation and develop a search heuristic that selects the number of mixture components based on the proposed formulation . to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed search and parameter estimation , we first consider modelling problems using gaussian mixtures and extend the work to include relevant discussion on mixture modelling of directional data using von mises - fisher distributions . the importance of gaussian mixtures in practical applications is well established . for a _ given _ number of components , the conventional method of estimating the parameters of a mixture relies on the expectation - maximization ( em ) algorithm @xcite . the standard em is a local optimization method , is sensitive to initialization , and in certain cases may converge to the boundary of parameter space @xcite . previous attempts to infer gaussian mixtures based on the mml framework have been undertaken using simplifying assumptions , such as the covariance matrices being diagonal @xcite , or coarsely approximating the probabilities of mixture parameters @xcite . further , the search heuristic adopted in some of these methods is to run the em several times for different numbers of components , @xmath4 , and select the @xmath4 with the best em outcome @xcite . a search method based on iteratively _ deleting _ components has been proposed by @xcite . it begins by assuming a very large number of components and selectively eliminates components deemed redundant ; there is no provision for recovering from deleting a component in error . in this work , we propose a search method which selectively _ splits , deletes _ , or _ merges _ components depending on improvement to the mml objective function . the operations , combined with em steps , result in a sensible redistribution of data between the mixture components . as an example , a component may be split into two children , and at a later stage , one of the children may be merged with another component . unlike the method of @xcite , our method starts with a one - component mixture and alters the number of components in subsequent iterations . this avoids the overhead of dealing with a large number of components unless required . the proposed search heuristic can be used with probability distributions for which the mml expressions to calculate message lengths for estimates and for data given those estimates are known . as an instance of this , section [ sec : search_method ] discusses modelling directional data using the von mises - fisher distributions . directional statistics have garnered support recently in real data mining problems where the _ direction _ , not magnitude , of vectors is significant . examples of such scenarios are found in earth sciences , meteorology , physics , biology , and other fields @xcite . the statistical properties of directional data have been studied using several types of distributions @xcite , often described on surfaces of compact manifolds , such as the sphere , ellipsoid , torus _ etc_. the most fundamental of these is the von mises - fisher ( vmf ) distribution which is analogous to a symmetric multivariate gaussian distribution , wrapped around a unit hypersphere @xcite . the probability density function of a vmf distribution with parameters @xmath8 ( mean direction , concentration parameter ) for a random unit vector @xmath9 on a @xmath10- dimensional hypersphere @xmath11 is given by : @xmath12 where @xmath13 is the normalization constant and @xmath14 is a modified bessel function of the first kind and order @xmath15 . the estimation of the parameters of the vmf distribution is often done using maximum likelihood . however , the complex nature of the mathematical form presents difficulty in estimating the concentration parameter @xmath16 . this has lead to researchers using many different approximations , as discussed in section [ sec : vmf_existing_methods ] . most of these methods perform well when the amount of data is large . at smaller sample sizes , they result in inaccurate estimates of @xmath16 , and are thus unreliable . we demonstrate this by the experiments conducted on a range of sample sizes . the problem is particularly evident when the dimensionality of the data is large , also affecting the application in which it is used , such as mixture modelling . we aim to rectify this issue by using mml estimates for @xmath16 . our experiments section demonstrates that the mml estimate of @xmath16 provides a more reliable answer and is an improvement on the current state of the art . these mml estimates are subsequently used in mixture modelling of vmf distributions ( see sections [ sec : search_method ] and [ sec : vmf_applications ] ) . previous studies have established the importance of von mises circular ( two - dimensional ) and von mises - fisher ( three - dimensional and higher ) mixtures , and demonstrated applications to clustering of protein dihedral angles @xcite , large - scale text clustering @xcite , and gene expression analyses @xcite . the merit of using cosine based similarity metrics , which are closely related to the vmf , for clustering high dimensional text data has been investigated in @xcite . for text clustering , there is evidence that vmf mixture models have a superior performance compared to other statistical distributions such as normal , multinomial , and bernoulli @xcite . movmf is a widely used package to perform clustering using vmf distributions @xcite . + * contributions : * the main contributions of this paper are as follows : * we derive the analytical estimates of the parameters of a multivariate gaussian distribution with full covariance matrix , using the mml principle @xcite . * we derive the expression to infer the concentration parameter @xmath16 of a generic @xmath3-dimensional vmf distribution using mml - based estimation . we demonstrate , through a series of experiments , that this estimate outperforms the previous ones , therefore making it a reliable candidate to be used in mixture modelling . * a generalized mml - based search heuristic is proposed to infer the optimal number of mixture components that would best explain the observed data ; it is based on the search used in various versions of the snob classification program @xcite . we compare it with the work of @xcite and demonstrate its effectiveness . * the search implements a generic approach to mixture modelling and allows , in this instance , the use of @xmath3-dimensional gaussian and vmf distributions under the mml framework . it infers the optimal number of mixture components , and their corresponding parameters . * further , we demonstrate the effectiveness of mml mixture modelling through its application to high dimensional text clustering and clustering of directional data that arises out of protein conformations . the rest of the paper is organized as follows : sections [ sec : gaussian_estimates ] and [ sec : vmf_existing_methods ] describe the respective estimators of gaussian and vmf distributions that are commonly used . section [ sec : mml_framework ] introduces the mml framework for parameter estimation . section [ sec : mml_est_derivations ] outlines the derivation of the mml parameter estimates of multivariate gaussian and vmf distributions . section [ sec : mml_mixture_modelling ] describes the formulation of a mixture model using mml and the estimation of the mixture parameters under the framework . section [ sec : mixture_existing_methods ] reviews the existing methods for selecting the mixture components . section [ sec : search_method ] describes our proposed approach to determine the number of mixture components . section [ sec : gaussian_experiments ] depicts the competitive performance of the proposed mml - based search through experiments conducted with gaussian mixtures . section [ sec : vmf_experiments ] presents the results for mml - based vmf parameter estimation and mixture modelling followed by results supporting its applications to text clustering and protein structural data in section [ sec : vmf_applications ] . the probability density function @xmath17 of a @xmath3-variate gaussian distribution is given as @xmath18 where @xmath19 , @xmath20 are the respective mean , ( symmetric ) covariance matrix of the distribution , and @xmath21 is the determinant of the covariance matrix . the traditional method to estimate the parameters of a gaussian distribution is by maximum likelihood . given data @xmath22 , where @xmath23 , the log - likelihood @xmath24 is given by @xmath25 to compute the maximum likelihood estimates , equation needs to be _ maximized_. this is achieved by computing the gradient of the log - likelihood function with respect to the parameters and solving the resultant equations . the _ gradient vector _ of @xmath24 with respect to @xmath19 and the _ gradient matrix _ of @xmath24 with respect to @xmath20 are given below . @xmath26 the maximum likelihood estimates are then computed by solving @xmath27 and @xmath28 and are given as : @xmath29 @xmath30 is known to be a biased estimate of the covariance matrix @xcite and issues related with its use in mixture modelling have been documented in @xcite and @xcite . an unbiased estimator of @xmath20 was proposed by @xcite and is given below . @xmath31 in addition to the maximum likelihood estimates , bayesian inference of gaussian parameters involving conjugate priors over the parameters has also been dealt with in the literature @xcite . however , the unbiased estimate of the covariance matrix , as determined by the sample covariance ( equation ) , is typically used in the analysis of gaussian distributions . for a von mises - fisher ( vmf ) distribution @xmath17 characterized by equation , and given data @xmath22 , such that @xmath32 , the log - likelihood @xmath24 is given by @xmath33 where @xmath34 is the sample size and @xmath35 ( the vector sum ) . let @xmath36 denote the magnitude of the resultant vector @xmath37 and let @xmath38 and @xmath39 be the maximum likelihood estimators of @xmath40 and @xmath16 respectively . under the condition that @xmath38 is a unit vector , the maximum likelihood estimates are obtained by maximizing @xmath24 as follows : @xmath41 solving the non - linear equation : @xmath42 yields the corresponding maximum likelihood estimate where @xmath43 represents the ratio of bessel functions . because of the difficulties in analytically solving equation ( [ eqn : ml_estimates ] ) , there have been several approaches to approximating @xmath39 @xcite . each of these methods is an improvement over their respective predecessors . @xcite is an improvement over the estimate proposed by @xcite . @xcite is an improvement over @xcite and @xcite fares better when compared to @xcite . the methods are summarized below . the approximation given by equation ( [ eqn : banerjee_approx ] ) is due to @xcite and provides an easy to use expression for @xmath39 . the formula is very appealing as it eliminates the need to evaluate complex bessel functions . @xcite demonstrated that this approximation yields better results compared to the ones suggested in @xcite . it is an empirical approximation which can be used as a starting point in estimating the root of equation ( [ eqn : ml_estimates ] ) . @xmath44 the approximation given by equation ( [ eqn : tanabe_approx ] ) is due to @xcite . the method utilizes the properties of bessel functions to determine the lower and upper bounds for @xmath39 and uses a fixed point iteration function in conjunction with linear interpolation to approximate @xmath39 . the bounds for @xmath39 are given by @xmath45 @xcite proposed to use a fixed point iteration function defined as @xmath46 and used this to approximate @xmath39 as @xmath47 this a heuristic approximation provided by @xcite . it involves refining the approximation given by @xcite ( equation ( [ eqn : banerjee_approx ] ) ) by performing two iterations of newton s method . @xcite demonstrate that this approximation fares well when compared to the approximation proposed by @xcite . the following two iterations result in @xmath48 , the approximation proposed by @xcite : @xmath49 @xmath50 this approximation provided by @xcite uses halley s method which is the second order expansion of taylor s series of a given function @xmath51 . the higher order approximation results in a more accurate estimate as demonstrated by @xcite . the iterative halley s method is truncated after iterating through two steps of the root finding algorithm ( similar to that done by @xcite ) . the following two iterations result in @xmath52 , the approximation proposed by @xcite : @xmath53 @xmath54 the common theme in all these methods is that they try to approximate the maximum likelihood estimate governed by equation ( [ eqn : ml_estimates ] ) . it is to be noted that the maximum likelihood estimators ( of concentration parameter @xmath16 ) have considerable bias @xcite . to counter this effect , we explore the minimum message length based estimation procedure . this bayesian method of estimation not only results in an unbiased estimate but also provides a framework to choose from several competing models @xcite . through a series of empirical tests , we demonstrate that the mml estimate is more reliable than any of the contemporary methods . @xcite have demonstrated the superior performance of the mml estimate for a three - dimensional vmf distribution . we extend their work to derive the mml estimators for a generic @xmath3-dimensional vmf distribution and compare its performance with the existing methods . @xcite developed the first practical criterion for model selection to be based on information theory . the resulting framework provides a rigorous means to objectively compare two competing hypotheses and , hence , choose the best one . as per bayes s theorem , @xmath55 where @xmath56 denotes some observed data , and @xmath57 some hypothesis about that data . further , @xmath58 is the joint probability of data @xmath56 and hypothesis @xmath57 , @xmath59 is the prior probability of hypothesis @xmath57 , @xmath60 is the prior probability of data @xmath56 , @xmath61 is the posterior probability of @xmath57 given @xmath56 , and @xmath62 is the likelihood . mml uses the following result from information theory @xcite : given an event or outcome @xmath63 whose probability is @xmath64 , the length of the optimal lossless code @xmath65 to represent that event requires @xmath66 bits . applying shannon s insight to bayes s theorem , @xcite got the following relationship between conditional probabilities in terms of optimal message lengths : @xmath67 as a result , given two competing hypotheses @xmath57 and @xmath68 , @xmath69 @xmath70 gives the posterior log - odds ratio between the two competing hypotheses . equation ( [ eqn : shannon_bayes_msg ] ) can be intrepreted as the _ total _ cost to encode a message comprising the hypothesis @xmath57 and data @xmath56 . this message is composed over into two parts : 1 . _ first part : _ the hypothesis @xmath57 , which takes @xmath71 bits , 2 . _ second part : _ the observed data @xmath56 using knowledge of @xmath57 , which takes @xmath72 bits . clearly , the message length can vary depending on the complexity of @xmath57 and how well it can explain @xmath56 . a more complex @xmath57 may fit ( i.e. , explain ) @xmath56 better but take more bits to be stated itself . the trade - off comes from the fact that ( hypothetically ) transmitting the message requires the encoding of both the hypothesis and the data given the hypothesis , that is , the model complexity @xmath71 and the goodness of fit @xmath72 . our proposed method of parameter estimation uses the mml inference paradigm . it is a bayesian method which has been applied to infer the parameters of several statistical distributions @xcite . we apply it to infer the parameter estimates of multivariate gaussian and vmf distributions . @xcite introduced a generalized scheme to estimate a vector of parameters @xmath73 of any distribution @xmath17 given data @xmath56 . the method involves choosing a reasonable prior @xmath74 on the hypothesis and evaluating the _ determinant _ of the fisher information matrix @xmath75 of the _ expected _ second - order partial derivatives of the negative log - likelihood function , @xmath76 . the parameter vector @xmath73 that minimizes the message length expression ( equation ( [ eqn : two_part_msg ] ) ) is the mml estimate according to @xcite . @xmath77 where @xmath78 is the number of free parameters in the model , and @xmath79 is the lattice quantization constant @xcite in @xmath78-dimensional space . the total message length @xmath80 in mml framework is composed of two parts : 1 . the statement cost of encoding the parameters , @xmath81 and 2 . the cost of encoding the data given the parameters , @xmath82 . a concise description of the mml method is presented in @xcite . we note here a few key differences between mml and ml / map based estimation methods . in maximum likelihood estimation , the statement cost of parameters is ignored , in effect considered constant , and minimizing the message length corresponds to minimizing the negative log - likelihood of the data ( the second part ) . in map based estimation , a probability _ density _ rather than the probability measure is used . continuous parameters can necessarily only be stated only to finite precision . mml incorporates this in the framework by determining the region of uncertainty in which the parameter is located . the value of @xmath83 gives a measure of the volume of the region of uncertainty in which the parameter @xmath73 is centered . this multiplied by the probability density @xmath74 gives the _ probability _ of a particular @xmath73 and is _ proportional _ to @xmath84 . this probability is used to compute the message length associated with encoding the continuous valued parameters ( to a finite precision ) . based on the mml inference process discussed in section [ sec : mml_framework ] , we now proceed to formulate the message length expressions and derive the parameter estimates of gaussian and von mises - fisher distributions . the mml framework requires the statement of parameters to a finite precision . the optimal precision is related to the fisher information and in conjunction with a reasonable prior , the probability of parameters is computed . a flat prior is usually chosen on each of the @xmath3 dimensions of @xmath19 @xcite and a conjugate inverted wishart prior is chosen for the covariance matrix @xmath20 @xcite . the joint prior density of the parameters is then given as @xmath85 the computation of the fisher information requires the evaluation of the second order partial derivatives of @xmath86 . let @xmath87 represent the determinant of the fisher information matrix . this is approximated as the product of @xmath88 and @xmath89 @xcite , where @xmath88 and @xmath89 are the respective determinants of fisher information matrices due to the parameters @xmath19 and @xmath20 . differentiating the gradient vector in equation with respect to @xmath19 , we have : @xmath90 to compute @xmath89 , @xcite derived an analytical expression using the theory of matrix derivatives based on matrix vectorization @xcite . let @xmath91\ , \forall 1 \leq i , j \leq d$ ] where @xmath92 denotes the element corresponding to the @xmath93 row and @xmath94 column of the covariance matrix . let @xmath95 be the vector containing the @xmath96 free parameters that completely describe the symmetric matrix @xmath20 . then , the fisher information due to the vector of parameters @xmath97 is equal to @xmath89 and is given by equation @xcite . @xmath98 multiplying equations and , we have @xmath99 to derive the message length expression to encode data using a certain @xmath100 , substitute equations , , and , in equation using the number of free parameters of the distribution as @xmath101 . hence , @xmath102 to obtain the mml estimates of @xmath19 and @xmath20 , equation needs to be minimized . the mml estimate of @xmath19 is same as the maximum likelihood estimate ( given in equation ) . to compute the mml estimate of @xmath20 , we need to compute the gradient matrix of @xmath103 with respect to @xmath20 and is given by equation @xmath104 the mml estimate of @xmath20 is obtained by solving @xmath105 ( given in equation ) . @xmath106 we observe that the mml estimate @xmath107 is same as the _ unbiased _ estimate of the covariance matrix @xmath20 , thus , lending credibility for its preference over the traditional ml estimate ( equation ) . parameter estimates for two and three - dimensional vmf have been explored previously @xcite . mml estimators of three - dimensional vmf were explored in @xcite , where they demonstrate that the mml - based inference compares favourably against the traditional ml and map based estimation methods . we use the @xcite method to formulate the objective function ( equation ) corresponding to a generic vmf distribution . regarding choosing a reasonable prior ( in the absence of any supporting evidence ) for the parameters @xmath108 of a vmf distribution , @xcite and @xcite suggest the use of the following _ colourless _ prior that is uniform in direction , normalizable and locally uniform at the cartesian origin in @xmath16 " : @xmath109 regarding evaluating the fisher information , @xcite argue that in the general @xmath3-dimensional case , @xmath110 where @xmath111 and @xmath112 are described by equations and respectively . substituting equations , and in equation with number of free parameters @xmath113 , we have the net message length expression : @xmath114 to obtain the mml estimates of @xmath19 and @xmath16 , equation needs to be minimized . the estimate for @xmath19 is same as the maximum likelihood estimate ( equation ) . the resultant equation in @xmath16 that needs to be minimized is then given by : @xmath115 to obtain the mml estimate of @xmath16 , we need to differentiate equation ( [ eqn : i_kappa ] ) and set it to zero . @xmath116 the non - linear equation : @xmath117 does not have a closed form solution . we try both the newton and halley s method to find an approximate solution . we discuss both variants and comment on the effects of the two approximations in the experimental results . to be fair and consistent with @xcite and @xcite , we use the initial guess of the root as @xmath118 ( equation ( [ eqn : banerjee_approx ] ) ) and iterate twice to obtain the mml estimate . 1 . _ approximation using newton s method : _ @xmath119 2 . _ approximation using halley s method : _ @xmath120 the details of evaluating @xmath121 and @xmath122 are discussed in appendix [ subsec : appendix_derivations ] . equation ( [ eqn : mml_newton_approx ] ) gives the mml estimate ( @xmath123 ) using newton s method and equation ( [ eqn : mml_halley_approx ] ) gives the mml estimate ( @xmath124 ) using halley s method . we used these values of mml estimates in mixture modelling using vmf distributions . [ sec : mml_gaussian_est ] mixture modelling involves representing an observed distribution of data as a weighted sum of individual probability density functions . specifically , the problem we consider here is to model the mixture distribution @xmath0 as defined in equation . for some observed data @xmath125 ( @xmath34 is the sample size ) , and a mixture @xmath0 , the log - likelihood using the mixture distribution is as follows : @xmath126 where @xmath127 , @xmath5 and @xmath6 are the weight and probability density of the @xmath7 component respectively . for a fixed @xmath4 , the mixture parameters @xmath128 are traditionally estimated using a standard _ expectation - maximization_(em ) algorithm @xcite . this is briefly discussed below . the standard em algorithm is based on maximizing the log - likelihood function of the data ( equation ) . the maximum likelihood estimates are then given as @xmath129 . because of the absence of a closed form solution for @xmath130 , a gradient descent method is employed where the parameter estimates are iteratively updated until convergence to some local optimum is achieved @xcite . the em method consists of two steps : * _ e - step _ : each datum @xmath131 has fractional membership to each of the mixture components . these partial memberships of the data points to each of the components are defined using the _ responsibility matrix _ @xmath132 where @xmath133 denotes the conditional probability of a datum @xmath131 belonging to the @xmath7 component . the effective membership associated with each component is then given by @xmath134 * _ m - step _ : assuming @xmath135 be the estimates at some iteration @xmath136 , the expectation of the log - likelihood using @xmath135 and the partial memberships is then _ maximized _ which is tantamount to computing @xmath137 , the updated maximum likelihood estimates for the next iteration @xmath138 . the weights are updated as @xmath139 . the above sequence of steps are repeated until a certain convergence criterion is satisfied . at some intermediate iteration @xmath136 , the mixture parameters are updated using the corresponding ml estimates and are given below . * _ gaussian : _ the ml updates of the mean and covariance matrix are @xmath140 * _ von mises - fisher : _ the resultant vector sum is updated as @xmath141 . if @xmath142 represents the magnitude of vector @xmath143 , then the updated mean and concentration parameter are @xmath144 we will first describe the methodology involved in formulating the mml - based objective function . we will then discuss how em is applied in this context . we refer to the discussion in @xcite to briefly describe the intuition behind mixture modelling using mml . encoding of a message using mml requires the encoding of ( 1 ) the model parameters and then ( 2 ) the data using the parameters . the statement costs for encoding the mixture model and the data can be decomposed into : 1 . encoding the _ number of components _ @xmath4 : in order to encode the message losslessly , it is required to initially state the number of components . in the absence of background knowledge , one would like to model the prior belief in such a way that the probability decreases for increasing number of components . if @xmath145 , then @xmath146 . the prior reflects that there is a difference of one bit in encoding the _ numbers _ @xmath4 and @xmath147 . alternatively , one could assume a uniform prior over @xmath4 within some predefined range . the chosen prior has little effect as its contribution is minimal when compared to the magnitude of the total message length @xcite . 2 . encoding the _ weights _ @xmath148 which are treated as parameters of a multinomial distribution with sample size @xmath149 . the length of encoding all the weights is then given by the expression @xcite : + @xmath150 3 . encoding each of the _ component parameters _ @xmath151 as given by @xmath152 ( discussed in section [ subsec : mml_parameter_estimation ] ) . 4 . encoding the _ data _ : each datum @xmath131 can be stated to a finite precision which is dictated by the accuracy of measurement is a constant value and has no effect on the overall inference process . it is used in order to maintain the theoretical validity when making the distinction between _ probability _ and _ probability density_. ] . if the precision to which each element of a @xmath3-dimensional vector can be stated is @xmath153 , then the _ probability _ of a datum @xmath154 is given as @xmath155 where @xmath156 is the _ probability density _ given by equation . hence , the _ total _ length of its encoding is given by @xmath157 the entire data @xmath56 can now be encoded as : @xmath158 thus , the total message length of a @xmath4 component mixture is given by equation . @xmath159 note that the _ constant _ term includes the lattice quantization constant ( resulting from stating all the model parameters ) in a @xmath78-dimensional space , where @xmath78 is equal to the number of free parameters in the mixture model . the parameters of the mixture model are those that _ minimize _ equation . to achieve this we use the standard em algorithm ( section [ subsec : em_ml ] ) , where , iteratively , the parameters are updated using their respective _ mml estimates_. the component weights are obtained by differentiating equation with respect to @xmath5 under the constraint @xmath160 . the derivation of the mml updates of the weights is shown in appendix [ subsec : wts_mml ] and are given as : @xmath161 the parameters of the @xmath7 component are updated using @xmath162 and @xmath163 ( equations , ) , the partial memberships assigned to the @xmath7 component at some intermediate iteration @xmath136 and and are given below . * _ gaussian : _ the mml updates of the mean and covariance matrix are @xmath164 * _ von mises - fisher : _ the resultant vector sum is updated as @xmath165 . if @xmath142 represents the magnitude of vector @xmath143 , then the updated mean is given by equation . @xmath166 the mml update of the concentration parameter @xmath167 is obtained by solving @xmath168 after substituting @xmath169 and @xmath170 in equation . the em is terminated when the change in the total message length ( improvement rate ) between successive iterations is less than some predefined threshold . the difference between the two variants of standard em discussed above is firstly the objective function that is being optimized . in section [ subsec : em_ml ] , the log - likelihood function is _ maximized _ which corresponds to @xmath171 term in section [ subsec : em_mml ] . equation ( [ eqn : mixture_msglen ] ) includes additional terms that correspond to the cost associated with stating the mixture parameters . secondly , in the m - step , in section [ subsec : em_ml ] , the components are updated using their ml estimates whereas in section [ subsec : em_mml ] , the components are updated using their mml estimates . the standard em algorithms outlined above can be used only when the number of mixture components @xmath4 is fixed or known _ a priori_. even when the number of components are fixed , em has potential pitfalls . the method is sensitive to the initialization conditions . to overcome this , some reasonable start state for the em may be determined by initially clustering the data @xcite . another strategy is to run the em a few times and choose the best amongst all the trials . @xcite point out that , in the case of gaussian mixture modelling , em can converge to the boundary of the parameter space when the corresponding covariance matrix is nearly singular or when there are few initial members assigned to that component . inferring the right " number of mixture components for unlabelled data has proven to be a thorny issue @xcite and there have been numerous approaches proposed that attempt to tackle this problem @xcite . given some observed data , there are infinitely many mixtures that one can fit to the data . any method that aims to selectively determine the optimal number of components should be able to factor the cost associated with the mixture parameters . to this end , several methods based on information theory have been proposed where there is some form of penalty associated with choosing a certain parameter value @xcite . we briefly review some of these methods and discuss the state of the art and then proceed to explain our proposed method . aic in the simplest form adds the _ number _ of free parameters @xmath78 to the negative log - likelihood expression . there are some variants of aic suggested @xcite . however , these variants introduce the same penalty constants for each additional parameter : @xmath172 bic , similar to aic , adds a constant multiple of @xmath173 ( @xmath34 being the sample size ) , for each free parameter in the model . @xcite formulated minimum description length ( mdl ) which formally coincides with bic @xcite . aic and bic / mdl serve as scoring functions to evaluate a model and its corresponding fit to the data . the formulations suggest that the parameter cost associated with adopting a model is dependent only on the number of free parameters and _ not _ on the parameter values themselves . in other words , the criteria consider all models of a particular type ( of probability distribution ) to have the same statement cost associated with the parameters . for example , a generic @xmath3-dimensional gaussian distribution has @xmath175 free parameters . all such distributions will have the same parameter costs regardless of their characterizing means and covariance matrices , which is an oversimplifying assumption which can hinder proper inference . the criteria can be interpreted under the mml framework wherein the first part of the message is a constant multiplied by the number of free parameters . aic and bic formulations can be obtained as approximations to the two - part mml formulation governed by equation @xcite . it has been argued that for tasks such as mixture modelling , where the number of free parameters potentially grows in proportion to the data , mml is known in theory to give consistent results as compared to aic and bic @xcite . to determine the optimal number of mixture components @xmath4 , the aic or bic scores are computed for mixtures with varying values of @xmath4 . the mixture model with the least score is selected as per these criteria . a @xmath3-variate gaussian mixture with @xmath4 number of components has @xmath176 free parameters . all mixtures with a set number of components have the same cost associated with their parameters using these criteria . the mixture complexity is therefore treated as independent of the constituent mixture parameters . in contrast , the mml formulation incorporates the statement cost of losslessly encoding mixture parameters by calculating their relevant probabilities as discussed in section [ sec : mml_mixture_modelling ] . a mml - based scoring function akin to the one shown in equation was used to model gaussian mixtures . however , the authors only consider the specific case of gaussians with diagonal covariance matrices , and fail to provide a general method dealing with full covariance matrices . a rigorous treatment on the selection of number of mixture components @xmath4 is lacking . @xcite experiment with different values of @xmath4 and choose the one which results in the minimum message length . for each @xmath4 , the standard em algorithm ( section [ subsec : em_ml ] ) was used to attain local convergence . the method , also referred to as _ laplace - empirical criterion _ ( lec ) @xcite , uses a scoring function derived using bayesian inference and serves to provide a tradeoff between model complexity and the quality of fit . the parameter estimates @xmath128 are those that result in the minimum value of the following scoring function . @xmath177 where @xmath56 is the dataset , @xmath178 is the negative log - likelihood given the mixture parameters @xmath128 , @xmath4 is the number of mixture components , @xmath3 the dimensionality of the data , @xmath179 are hyperparameters ( which are set to 1 in their experiments ) , @xmath180 is a pre - defined constant or is pre - computed using the entire data , @xmath181 is the hessian matrix which is equivalent to the empirical fisher matrix for the set of component parameters , and @xmath78 is the number of free parameters in the model . the formulation in equation can be obtained as an approximation to the message length expression in equation by identifying the following related terms in both equations . 1 . @xmath182 2 . for a @xmath3-variate gaussian with mean @xmath19 and covariance matrix @xmath20 , the joint prior @xmath183 is calculated as follows : * _ prior on @xmath19 : _ each of the @xmath3 parameters of the mean direction are assumed to be have uniform priors in the range @xmath184 , so that the prior density of the mean is @xmath185 . * _ prior on @xmath20 : _ it is assumed that the prior density is dependent only on the diagonal elements in @xmath20 . each diagonal covariance element is assumed to have a prior in the range @xmath186 so that the prior on @xmath20 is considered to be @xmath187 + the joint prior , is therefore , assumed to be @xmath188 . + thus , @xmath189 + 3 . @xmath190 + 4 . @xmath191 although the formulation is an improvement over the previously discussed methods , there are some limitations due to the assumptions made while proposing the scoring function : * while computing the prior density of the covariance matrix , the off - diagonal elements are ignored . * the computation of the determinant of the fisher matrix is approximated by computing the hessain @xmath192 . it is to be noted that while the hessian is the _ observed information _ ( data dependent ) , the fisher information is the _ expectation _ of the observed information . mml formulation requires the use of the expected value . * further , the approximated hessian was derived for gaussians with diagonal covariances . for gaussians with full covariance matrices , the hessian was approximated by replacing the diagonal elements with the corresponding eigen values in the hessian expression . the empirical fisher computed in this form does not guarantee the charactersitic invariance property of the classic mml method @xcite . the search method used to select the optimal number of components is rudimentary . the optimal number of mixture components is chosen by running the em 10 times for every value of @xmath4 within a given range . an optimal @xmath4 is selected as the one for which the best of the 10 trials results in the least value of the scoring function . the icl criterion _ maximizes _ the _ complete log - likelihood _ ( cl ) given by @xmath193 where @xmath194 is the log - likelihood ( equation ) , @xmath133 is the responsibility term ( equation ) , and @xmath195 if @xmath131 arises from component @xmath196 and zero otherwise . the term @xmath197 is explained as the estimated mean entropy . the icl criterion is then defined as : @xmath198where @xmath78 is the number of free parameters in the model . we observe that similar to bic , the icl scoring function penalizes each free parameter by a constant value and does not account for the model parameters . the search method adopted in this work is similar to the one used by @xcite . the em algorithm is initiated 20 times for each value of @xmath4 with random starting points and the best amongst those is chosen . the method uses the mml criterion to formulate the scoring function given by equation . the formulation can be intrepreted as a two - part message for encoding the model parameters and the observed data . @xmath199 where @xmath200 is the _ number _ of free parameters per component and @xmath5 is the component weight . the scoring function is derived from equation by assuming the prior density of the component parameters to be a jeffreys prior . if @xmath151 is the vector of parameters describing the @xmath7 component , then the prior density @xmath201 @xcite . similarly , a prior for weights would result in @xmath202 . these assumptions are used in the encoding of the parameters which correspond to the first part of the message . we note that the scoring function is consistent with the mml scheme of encoding parameters and the data using those parameters . however , the formulation can be improved by amending the assumptions as detailed in in section [ sec : mml_est_derivations ] . further , the assumptions made in @xcite have the following side effects : * the value of @xmath203 gives the cost of encoding the component parameters . by assuming @xmath201 , the message length associated with using any vector of parameters @xmath151 is essentially treated the same . to avoid this , the use of independent uniform priors over non - informative jeffreys s priors was advocated previously @xcite . the use of jeffreys prior offers certain advantages , for example , not having to compute the fisher information @xcite . however , this is crucial and can not be ignored as it dictates the _ precision of encoding the parameter vector_. @xcite states that jeffreys , while noting the interesting properties of the prior formulation did not advocate its use as a genuine expression of prior knowledge . " + by making this assumption , @xcite _ sidestep _ " the difficulty associated with explicitly computing the fisher information associated with the component parameters . hence , for encoding the parameters of the entire mixture , _ only _ the cost associated with encoding the component weights is considered . * the code length to state each @xmath151 is , therefore , greatly simplified as @xmath204 ( notice the sole dependence on weight @xmath5 ) . @xcite interpret this as being similar to a mdl formulation because @xmath205 gives the expected number of data points generated by the @xmath7 component . this is equivalent to the bic criterion discussed earlier . we note that mdl / bic are highly simplified versions of mml formulation and therefore , equation does not capture the entire essence of complexity and goodness of fit accurately . the method begins by assuming a large number of components and updates the weights iteratively in the em steps as @xmath206 where @xmath207 is the effective membership of data points in @xmath7 component ( equation ) . a component is annihilated when its weight becomes zero and consequently the number of mixture components decreases . we note that the search method proposed by @xcite using the mml criterion is an improvement over the methods they compare against . however , we make the following remarks about their search method . * the method updates the weights as given by equation . during any iteration , if the amount of data allocated to a component is less than @xmath208 , its weight is updated as zero and this component is ignored in subsequent iterations . this imposes a lower bound on the amount of data that can be assigned to each component . as an example , for a gaussian mixture in 10-dimensions , the number of free parameters per component is @xmath209 , and hence the lower bound is 33 . hence , in this exampe , if a component has @xmath210 data , the mixture size is reduced and these data are assigned to some other component(s ) . consider a scenario where there are 50 observed 10 dimensional data points originally generated by a mixture with two components with equal mixing proportions . the method would always infer that there is only one component regardless of the separation between the two components . this is clearly a wrong inference ! ( see section [ subsec : fj_weight_updates_exp2b ] for the relevant experiments ) . * once a component is discarded , the mixture size decreases by one , and it can not be recovered . because the memberships @xmath207 are updated iteratively using an em algorithm and because em might not always lead to global optimum , it is conceivable that the updated values need not always be optimal . this might lead to situations where a component is deleted owing to its low prominence . there is no provision to increase the mixture size in the subsequent stages of the algorithm to account for such behaviour . * the method assumes a large number of initial components in an attempt to be robust with respect to em initialization . however , this places a significant overhead on the computation due to handling several components . _ summary : _ we observe that while all these methods ( and many more ) work well within their defined scope , they are incomplete in achieving the true objective that is to rigorously score models and their ability to fit the data . the methods discussed above can be seen as different approximations to the mml framework . they adopted various simplifying assumptions and approximations . to avoid such limitations , we developed a classic mml formulation , giving the complete message length formulations for gaussian and von mises - fisher distributions in section [ sec : mml_est_derivations ] . secondly , in most of these methods , the search for the optimal number of mixture components is achieved by selecting the mixture that results in the best em outcome out of many trials @xcite . this is not an elegant solution and @xcite proposed a search heuristic which integrates estimation and model selection . a comparative study of these methods is presented in @xcite . their analysis suggested the superior performance of icl @xcite and lec @xcite . later , @xcite demonstrated that their proposed method outperforms the contemporary methods based on icl and lec and is regarded as the current state of the art . we , therefore , compare our method against that of @xcite and demonstrate its effectiveness . with this background , we formulate an alternate search heuristic to infer the optimal number of mixture components which aims to address the above limitations . the space of candidate mixture models to explain the given data is infinitely large . as per the mml criterion ( equation ) , the goal is to search for the mixture that has the smallest overall message length . we have seen in section [ subsec : em_mml ] that if the number of mixture components are fixed , then the em algorithm can be used to estimate the mixture parameters , namely the component weights and the parameters of each component . however , here it is required to search for the optimal _ number _ of mixture components along with the corresponding mixture parameters . our proposed search heuristic extends the mml - based snob program @xcite for unsupervised learning . we define three operations , namely _ split , delete , _ and _ merge _ that can be applied to any component in the mixture . [ algm ] @xmath211 the pseudocode of our search method is presented in algorithm [ algm ] . the basic idea behind the search strategy is to _ perturb _ a mixture from its current suboptimal state to obtain a new state ( if the perturbed mixture results in a smaller message length ) . in general , if a ( current ) mixture has @xmath4 components , it is perturbed using a series of _ split , delete _ , and _ merge _ operations to check for improvement . each component is split and the new @xmath212-component mixture is re - estimated . if there is an improvement ( _ i.e. , _ if there is a decrease in message length with respect to the current mixture ) , the new @xmath212-component mixture is retained . there are @xmath4 splits possible and the one that results in the greatest improvement is recorded ( lines 5 7 in algorithm [ algm ] ) . a component is first split into two sub - components ( children ) which are locally optimized by the em algorithm on the data that belongs to that sole component . the child components are then integrated with the others and the mixture is then optimized to generate a @xmath147 component mixture . the reason for this is , rather than use random initial values for the em , it is better if we start from some already optimized state to reach to a better state . similarly , each of the components is then deleted , one after the other , and the @xmath213-component mixture is compared against the current mixture . there are @xmath4 possible deletions and the best amongst these is recorded ( lines 8 11 in algorithm [ algm ] ) . finally , the components in the current mixture are merged with their closest matches ( determined by calculating the kl - divergence ) and each of the resultant @xmath213-component mixtures are evaluated against the @xmath4 component mixture . the best among these merged mixtures is then retained ( lines 12 15 in algorithm [ algm ] ) . we initially start by assuming a one component mixture . this component is split into two children which are locally optimized . if the split results in a better model , it is retained . for any given @xmath4-component mixture , there might be improvement due to splitting , deleting and/or merging its components . we select the perturbation that best improves the current mixture . this process is repeated until there is no further improvement possible . and the algorithm is continued . the notion of _ best _ or improved mixture is based on the amount of reduction of message length that the perturbed mixture provides . in the current state , the observed data have partial memberships in each of the @xmath4 components . before the execution of each operation , these memberships need to be adjusted and a em is subsequently carried out to achieve an optimum with a different number of components . we will now examine each operation in detail and see how the memberships are affected after each operation . let @xmath214 $ ] be the @xmath215 responsibility ( membership ) matrix and @xmath5 be the weight of @xmath7 component in mixture @xmath0 . 1 . _ split ( line 6 in algorithm [ algm ] ) : _ as an example , assume a component with index @xmath216 and weight @xmath217 in the current mixture @xmath0 is split to generate two child components . the goal is to find two distinct clusters amongst the data associated with component @xmath218 . it is to be noted that the data have fractional memberships to component @xmath218 . the em is therefore , carried out _ within _ the component @xmath218 assuming a _ two - component sub - mixture _ with the data weighted as per their current memberships @xmath219 . the remaining @xmath220 components are untouched . an em is carried out to optimize the two - component sub - mixture . the initial state and the subsequent updates in the maximization - step are described below . + _ parameter initialization of the two - component sub - mixture : _ the goal is to identify two distinct clusters within the component @xmath218 . for _ gaussian _ mixtures , to provide a reasonable starting point , we compute the direction of maximum variance of the parent component and locate two points which are one standard deviation away on either side of its mean ( along this direction ) . these points serve as the initial means for the two children generated due to splitting the parent component . selecting the initial means in this manner ensures they are reasonably apart from each other and serves as a good starting point for optimizing the two - component sub - mixture . the memberships are initialized by allocating the data points to the closest of the two means . once the means and the memberships are initialized , the covariance matrices of the two child components are computed . + there are conceivably several variations to how the two - component sub - mixture can be initialized . these include random initialization , selecting two data points as the initial component means , and many others . however , the reason for selecting the direction of maximum variance is to utilize the available characteristic of data , _ i.e. , _ the distribution within the component @xmath218 . for _ von mises - fisher _ mixtures , the maximum variance strategy ( as for gaussian mixtures ) can not be easily adopted , as the data is distributed on the hypershpere . hence , in this work , we randomly allocate data memberships and compute the components ( initial ) parameters . + once the parameters of the sub - mixture are initialized , an em algorithm is carried out ( just for the sub - mixture ) with the following maximization - step updates . let @xmath221 $ ] be the @xmath222 responsibility matrix for the two - component sub - mixture . for @xmath223 , let @xmath224 be the effective memberships of data belonging to the two child components , let @xmath225 be the weights of the child components within the sub - mixture , and let @xmath226 be the parameters describing the child components . * the effective memberships are updated as given by equation . @xmath227 * as the sub - mixture comprises of two child components , substitute @xmath228 in equation to obtain the updates for the weights . these are given by equation . @xmath229 * for _ gaussian _ mixtures , the component parameters @xmath230 are updated as follows : @xmath231 * for _ von mises - fisher _ mixtures , the component parameters @xmath232 are updated as follows : @xmath233 @xmath234 represents the magnitude of vector @xmath235 . the update of the concentration parameter @xmath236 is obtained by solving @xmath237 after substituting @xmath238 and @xmath239 in equation . + the difference between the em updates in equations , and equations , is the presence of the coefficient @xmath240 with each @xmath131 . since we are considering the sub - mixture , the original responsibility @xmath241 is multiplied by the responsibility within the sub - mixture @xmath242 to quantify the influence of datum @xmath131 to each of the child components . + after the sub - mixture is locally optimized , it is integrated with the untouched @xmath220 components of @xmath0 to result in a @xmath147 component mixture @xmath243 . an em is finally carried out on the combined @xmath147 components to estimate the parameters of @xmath243 and result in an optimized @xmath212-component mixture as follows . + _ em initialization for @xmath243 : _ usually , the em is started by a random initialization of the members . however , because the two - component sub - mixture is now optimal and the @xmath220 components in @xmath0 are also in an optimal state , we exploit this situation to initialize the em ( for @xmath243 ) with a reasonable starting point . as mentioned above , the component with index @xmath218 with component weight @xmath217 is split . upon integration , the ( child ) components that replaced component @xmath218 will now correspond to indices @xmath244 and @xmath245 in the new mixture @xmath243 . let @xmath246 \,\forall 1 \leq i \leq n , 1 \leq j \leq m+1 $ ] be the responsibility matrix for the new mixture @xmath243 and let @xmath247 be the component weights in @xmath243 . * _ component weights : _ the weights are initialized as follows : @xmath248 * _ memberships : _ the responsibility matrix @xmath249 is initialized for all data @xmath250 as follows : @xmath251 where @xmath252 are the effective memberships of the components in @xmath243 . + with these starting points , the parameters of @xmath243 are estimated using the traditional em algorithm with updates in the maximization - step given by equations , , and . the em results in local convergence of the @xmath212-component mixture . if the resultant message length of encoding data using @xmath243 is lower than that due to @xmath0 , that means the perturbation of @xmath0 because of splitting component @xmath218 resulted in a new mixture @xmath243 that compresses the data better , and hence , is a better mixture model to explain the data . 2 . _ delete ( line 10 in algorithm [ algm ] ) : _ the goal here is to remove a component from the current mixture and check whether it results in a better mixture model to explain the observed data . assume the component with index @xmath218 and the corresponding weight @xmath217 is to be deleted from @xmath0 to generate a @xmath220 component mixture @xmath243 . once deleted , the data memberships of the component need to be redistributed between the remaining components . the redistribution of data results in a good starting point to employ the em algorithm to estimate the parameters of @xmath243 as follows . + _ em initialization for @xmath243 : _ let @xmath246 $ ] be the @xmath253 responsibility matrix for the new mixture @xmath243 and let @xmath247 be the weight of @xmath7 component in @xmath243 . * _ component weights : _ the weights are initialized as follows : @xmath254 it is to be noted that @xmath255 because the mml update expression in the m - step for the component weights always ensures non - zero weights during every iteration of the em algorithm ( see equation ) . * _ memberships : _ the responsibility matrix @xmath249 is initialized for all data @xmath250 as follows : @xmath256 where @xmath252 are the effective memberships of the components in @xmath243 . it is possible for a datum @xmath131 to have complete membership in component @xmath218 ( _ i.e. , _ @xmath257 ) , in which case , its membership is equally distributed among the other @xmath220 components ( _ i.e. , _ @xmath258 ) . + with these readjusted weights and memberships , and the constituent @xmath220 components , the traditional em algorithm is used to estimate the parameters of the new mixture @xmath243 . if the resultant message length of encoding data using @xmath243 is lower than that due to @xmath0 , that means the perturbation of @xmath0 because of deleting component @xmath218 resulted in a new mixture @xmath243 with better explanatory power , which is an improvement over the current mixture . 3 . _ merge ( line 14 in algorithm [ algm ] ) : _ the idea is to join a pair of components of @xmath0 and determine whether the resulting @xmath213-component mixture @xmath243 is any better than the current mixture @xmath0 . one strategy to identify an improved mixture model would be to consider merging all possible pairs of components and choose the one which results in the greatest improvement . this would , however , lead to a runtime complexity of @xmath259 , which could be significant for large values of @xmath4 . another strategy is to consider merging components which are close " to each other . for a given component , we identify its _ closest _ component by computing the kullback - leibler ( kl ) distance with all others and selecting the one with the least value . this would result in a linear runtime complexity of @xmath260 as computation of kl - divergence is a constant time operation . for every component in @xmath0 , its closest match is identified and they are merged to obtain a @xmath220 component mixture @xmath243 . merging the pair involves reassigning the component weights and the memberships . an em algorithm is then employed to optimize @xmath243 . + assume components with indices @xmath218 and @xmath261 are merged . let their weights be @xmath217 and @xmath262 ; and their responsibility terms be @xmath219 and @xmath263 respectively . the component that is formed by merging the pair is determined first . it is then integrated with the @xmath264 remaining components of @xmath0 to produce a @xmath213-component mixture @xmath243 . + _ em initialization for @xmath243 : _ let @xmath265 and @xmath266 be the weight and responsibility vector of the merged component @xmath267 respectively . they are given as follows : @xmath268 the parameters of this merged component are estimated as follows : * _ gaussian : _ the parameters @xmath269 are : @xmath270 * _ von mises - fisher : _ the parameters @xmath271 are : @xmath272 the concentration parameter @xmath273 is obtained by solving @xmath274 after substituting @xmath275 and @xmath276 in equation . + the merged component @xmath267 with weight @xmath265 , responsibility vector @xmath277 , and parameters @xmath278 is then integrated with the @xmath264 components . the merged component and its associated memberships along with the @xmath264 other components serve as the starting point for optimizing the new mixture @xmath243 . if @xmath243 results in a lower message length compared to @xmath0 that means the perturbation of @xmath0 because of merging the pair of components resulted in an improvement to the current mixture . r0.35 we explain the proposed inference of mixture components through the following example that was also considered by @xcite . consider a bivariate gaussian mixture shown in fig . [ fig : mix1 ] . the mixture has three components with equal weights of 1/3 each and their means at ( -2,0 ) , ( 0,0 ) , and ( 2,0 ) . the covariance matrices of the three components are the same and are equal to @xmath279 . we simulate 900 data points from this mixture ( as done by @xcite ) and employ the proposed search strategy . the progression of the search method using various operations is detailed below . _ search for the optimal mixture model : _ the method begins by inferring a one - component mixture @xmath280 ( see fig . [ fig : mix1_iter_1_splits](a ) ) . it then splits this component ( as described in _ split _ step of section [ subsec : search_operations ] ) and checks whether there is an improvement in explanation . the red ellipse in fig [ fig : mix1_iter_1_splits](b ) depicts the component being split . the direction of maximum variance ( dotted black line ) is first identified , and the means ( shown by black dots at the end of the dotted line ) are initialized . an em algorithm is then used to optimize the two children and this results in a mixture @xmath281 shown in fig [ fig : mix1_iter_1_splits](c ) . since the new mixture has a lower message length , the current is updated as @xmath281 . in the second iteration , each component in @xmath281 is iteratively split , deleted , and merged . [ fig : mix1_iter_2_splits ] shows the splitting ( red ) of the first component . on splitting , the new mixture @xmath282 results in a lower message length . deletion of the first component is shown in fig . [ fig : mix1_iter_2_deletions ] . before merging the first component , we identify its closest component ( the one with the least kl - divergence ) ( see fig . [ fig : mix1_iter_2_merges ] ) . deletion and merging operations , in this case , do not result in an improvement . these two operations have different intermediate em initializations ( figures [ fig : mix1_iter_2_deletions](b ) and [ fig : mix1_iter_2_merges](b ) ) but result in the same optimized one - component mixture . the same set of operations are performed on the second component in @xmath281 . in this particular case , splitting results in an improved mixture ( same as @xmath282 ) . @xmath282 is updated as the new parent and the series of split , delete , and merge operations are carried out on all components in @xmath282 . [ fig : mix1_iter_3 ] shows these operations on the first component . we see that splitting the first component in @xmath282 results in @xmath283 ( see fig . [ fig : mix1_iter_3](c ) ) . however , @xmath283 is not an improvement over @xmath282 as seen by the message lengths and is , therfore , discarded . similarly , deletion and merging of the components do not yield improvements to @xmath282 . the operations are carried out on the remaining two components in @xmath282 ( not shown in the figure ) too . these perturbations do not produce improved mixtures in terms of the total message length . since the third iteration does not result in any further improvement , the search terminates and the parent @xmath282 is considered to be the best mixture . + + in different stages of the search method , we have different intermediate mixtures . em is a gradient descent technique and it can get trapped in a local optimum . by employing the suggested search , we are exhaustively considering the possible options , and aiming to reduce the possibility of the em getting stuck in a local optimum . the proposed method infers a mixture by balancing the tradeoff due to model complexity and the fit to the data . this is particularly useful when there is no prior knowledge pertaining to the nature of the data . in such a case , this method provides an objective way to infer a mixture with suitable components that best explains the data through lossless compression . another example is shown in appendix [ subsec : appendix_mix2 ] , where the evolution of the inferred mixture is explored in the case of a mixture with overlapping components . + _ variation of the two - part message length : _ the search method infers three components and terminates . in order to demonstrate that the inferred number of components is the optimum number , we infer mixtures with increasing number of components ( until @xmath284 as an example ) and plot their resultant message lengths . for each @xmath285 , the standard em algorithm ( section [ subsec : em_mml ] ) is employed to infer the mixture parameters . r0.5 fig . [ fig : individual_msglens_gaussian ] shows the total message lengths to which the em algorithm converges for varying number of components @xmath4 . as expected , the total message length ( green curve ) drastically decreases initially until @xmath286 components are inferred . starting from @xmath287 , the total message length gradually increases , clearly suggesting that the inferred models are over - fitting the data with increasing statement cost to encode the additional parameters of these ( more complex ) models . we further elaborate on the reason for the initial decrease and subsequent increase in the total message length . as per mml evaluation criterion , the message length comprises of two parts statement cost for the parameters and the cost for stating the data using those parameters . the model complexity ( which corresponds to the mixture parameters ) increases with increasing @xmath4 . therefore , the first part of the message to encode parameters increases with an increase in the number of parameters . this behaviour is illustrated by the red curve in fig . [ fig : individual_msglens_gaussian ] . the first part message lengths are shown in red on the right side y - axis in the figure . as the mixture model becomes increasingly more complex , the error of fitting the data decreases . this corresponds to the second part of the message in the mml encoding framework . this behaviour is consistent with what is observed in fig . [ fig : individual_msglens_gaussian ] ( blue curve ) . there is a sharp fall until @xmath286 ; then onwards increasing the model complexity does not lower the error significantly . the error saturates and there is minimal gain with regards to encoding the data ( the case of overfitting ) . however , the model complexity dominates after @xmath286 . the optimal balance is achieved when @xmath286 . in summary , the message length at @xmath286 components was rightly observed to be the optimum for this example . we note that for a fixed number of mixture components , the em algorithm for the mml metric is monotonically decreasing . however , while searching for the number of components , mml continues to decrease until some optimum is found and then steadily increases as illustrated through this example . we compare our proposed inference methodology against the widely cited method of @xcite . the performance of their method is compared against that of bayesian information criterion ( bic ) , integrated complete likelihood ( icl ) , and approximate bayesian ( lec ) methods ( discussed in section [ sec : mixture_existing_methods ] ) . it was shown that the method of @xcite was far superior than bic , icl and lec ( using gaussian mixtures ) . in the following sections , we demonstrate through a series of experiments that our proposed approach to infer mixtures fares better when compared to that of @xcite . the experimental setup is as follows : we use a gaussian mixture @xmath288 ( true distribution ) , generate a random sample from it , and infer the mixture using the data . this is repeated 50 times and we compare the performance of our method against that of @xcite . as part of our analysis , we compare the number of inferred mixture components as well as the quality of mixtures . _ comparing message lengths : _ the mml framework allows us to objectively compare mixture models by computing the total message length used to encode the data . the difference in message lengths gives the log - odds posterior ratio of any two mixtures ( equation ) . given some observed data , and any two mixtures , one can determine which of the two best explains the data . our search methodology uses the scoring function ( @xmath289 ) defined in equation . as elaborated in section [ subsec : fj ] , @xcite use an approximated mml - like scoring function ( @xmath290 ) given by equation . we employ our search method and the method of @xcite to infer the mixtures using the same data ; let the inferred mixtures be @xmath291 and @xmath292 respectively . we compute two quantities : @xmath293 we use the two different scoring functions to compute the differences in message lengths of the resulting mixtures @xmath292 and @xmath291 . since the search method used to obtain @xmath291 optimizes the scoring function @xmath289 , it is expected that @xmath294 and consequently @xmath295 . this implies that our method is performing better using our defined objective function . however , if @xmath296 , this indicates that our inferred mixture @xmath291 results in a lower value of the scoring function that is defined by @xcite . such an evaluation not only demonstrates the superior performance of our search ( leading to @xmath291 ) using our defined scoring function but also proves it is better using the scoring function as defined by @xcite . _ kullback leibler ( kl ) divergence : _ in addition to using message length based evaluation criterion , we also compare the mixtures using kl - divergence @xcite . the metric gives a measure of the similarity between two distributions ( the lower the value , the more similar the distributions ) . for a mixture probability distribution , there is no analytical form to compute the metric . however , one can calculate its empirical value ( which asymptotically converges to the kl - divergence ) . in experiments relating to mixture simulations , we know the true mixture @xmath288 from which the data @xmath297 is being sampled . the kl - divergence is given by the following expression : @xmath298 \approx \frac{1}{n } \sum_{i=1}^n\log\frac{\pr(\mathbf{x}_i,{\mathcal{m}}^t)}{\pr(\mathbf{x}_i,{\mathcal{m}})}\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath0 is a mixture distribution ( @xmath291 or @xmath292 ) whose _ closeness _ to the true mixture @xmath288 is to be determined . an experiment conducted by @xcite was to randomly generate @xmath299 data points from a two - component ( with equal mixing proportions ) bivariate mixture @xmath288 whose means are at @xmath300 and @xmath301 , and equal covariance matrices : @xmath302 ( the identity matrix ) , and compare the number of inferred components . we repeat the same experiment here and compare with the results of @xcite . the separation @xmath303 between the means is gradually increased and the percentage of the correct selections ( over 50 simulations ) as determined by the two search methods is plotted . [ fig : gaussian_2d_mixture_inference](a ) shows the results of this experiment . as the separation between the component means is increased , the number of correctly inferred components increases . we conducted another experiment where we fix the separation between the two components and increase the amount of data being sampled from the mixture . [ fig : gaussian_2d_mixture_inference](b ) illustrates the results for a separation of @xmath304 . as expected , increasing the sample size results in an increase in the number of correct selections . both the search methods eventually infer the true number of components at sample size @xmath305 . we note that in both these cases , the differences in message lengths @xmath306 and @xmath307 are close to zero . the kl - divergences for the mixtures inferred by the two search methods are also the same . therefore , for this experimental setup , the performance of both the methods is roughly similar . as the difference between the two search methods is not apparent from these experiments , we wanted to investigate the behaviour of the methods with smaller sample sizes . we repeated the experiment similar to that shown in fig . [ fig : gaussian_2d_mixture_inference](a ) but with a sample size of @xmath308 . our search method results in a mean value close to 1 for different values of @xmath303 ( see table [ tab : gaussian_2d_mixture_inference_boxplot ] ) . the mean value of the number of inferred components using the search method of @xcite fluctuates between 2 and 3 . however , there is significant variance in the number of inferred components ( see table [ tab : gaussian_2d_mixture_inference_boxplot ] ) . these results are also depicted through a boxplot ( fig . [ fig : gaussian_2d_mixture_inference_boxplot ] ) . there are many instances where the number of inferred components is more than 3 . the results indicate that the search method ( fj ) is overfitting the data . r0.5 further , we evaluate the correctness of the mixtures inferred by the two search methods by comparisons using the message length formulations and kl-divergence.fig . [ fig : gaussian_2d_msglen_comparisons ] shows the boxplot of the difference in message lengths of the mixtures @xmath291 inferred using our proposed search method and the mixtures @xmath292 inferred using that of @xcite . @xmath295 across all values of @xmath303 for the 50 simulations . as per equation , we have @xmath294 . this implies that @xmath291 has a lower message length compared to @xmath292 when evaluated using our scoring function . similarly , we have @xmath309 , _ i.e. , _ @xmath310 . this implies that @xmath292 has a lower message length compared to @xmath291 when evaluated using fj s scoring function . these results are not surprising as @xmath291 and @xmath292 are obtained using the search methods which optimize the respective mml and mml - like scoring functions . we then analyzed the kl - divergence of @xmath291 and @xmath292 with respect to the true bivariate mixture @xmath288 over all 50 simulations and across all values of @xmath303 . ideally , the kl - divergence should be close to zero . [ fig : gaussian_2d_kldiv_comparisons](a ) shows the kl - divergence of the mixtures inferred using the two search methods with respect to @xmath288 when the separation is @xmath304 . the proposed search method infers mixtures whose kl - divergence ( denoted by red lines ) is close to zero , and more importantly less than the kl - divergence of mixtures inferred by the search method of @xcite ( denoted by blue lines ) . the same type of behaviour is noticed with other values of @xmath303 . [ fig : gaussian_2d_kldiv_comparisons](b ) compares the kl - divergence for varying values of @xmath303 . the median value of the kl - divergence due to the proposed search method is close to zero with not much variation . the search method of @xcite always result in kl - divergence higher than that of ours . the results suggest that , in this case , mixtures @xmath292 inferred by employing the search method of @xcite deviate significantly from the true mixture distribution @xmath288 . this can also be explained by the fact that there is a wide spectrum of the number of inferred components ( fig . [ fig : gaussian_2d_mixture_inference_boxplot ] ) . this suggests that the mml - like scoring function is failing to control the tradeoff between complexity and quality of fit , and hence , is selecting overly complex mixture models . along the lines of the previous experiment , @xcite conducted another experiment for a 10-variate two - component mixture @xmath288 with equal mixing proportions . the means are at @xmath311 and @xmath312 , so that the euclidean distance between them is @xmath313 . the covariances of the two components are @xmath302 ( the identity matrix ) . random samples of size @xmath299 were generated from the mixture and the number of inferred components are plotted . the experiment is repeated for different values of @xmath303 and over 50 simulations . [ fig : gaussian_10d_mixture_inference](a ) shows the number of inferred components using the two search methods . at lower values of @xmath303 , the components are close to each other , and hence , it is relatively more difficult to correctly infer the true number of components . we observe that our proposed method performs clearly better than that of @xcite across all values of @xmath303 . we also compared the quality of these inferred mixtures by calculating the difference in message lengths using the two scoring functions and the kl - divergence with respect to @xmath288 . for all values of @xmath303 , @xmath295 , _ i.e. , _ our inferred mixtures @xmath291 have a lower message length compared to @xmath292 when evaluated using our scoring function . more interestingly , we also note that @xmath314 ( see fig . [ fig : gaussian_10d_comparisons](a ) ) . this reflects that @xmath291 have a lower message length compared to @xmath292 when evaluated using the scoring function of @xcite . this suggests that their search method results in a sub - optimal mixture @xmath292 and fails to infer the better @xmath291 . in addition to the message lengths , we analyze the mixtures using kl - divergence . similar to the bivariate example in fig . [ fig : gaussian_2d_kldiv_comparisons](a ) , the kl - divergence of our inferred mixtures @xmath291 is lower than @xmath292 , the mixtures inferred by @xcite . [ fig : gaussian_10d_comparisons](b ) shows the boxplot of kl - divergence of the inferred mixtures @xmath291 and @xmath292 . at higher values of @xmath315 , the median value of kl - divergence is close to zero , as the number of correctly inferred components ( fig . [ fig : gaussian_10d_mixture_inference](a ) ) is more than 90% . however , our method always infers mixtures @xmath291 with lower kl - divergence compared to @xmath292 . these experimental results demonstrate the superior performance of our proposed search method . another experiment was carried out where the @xmath316 was held constant ( extremely close components ) , gradually increased the sample size @xmath34 , and plotted the average number of inferred components by running 50 simulations for each @xmath34 . [ fig : gaussian_10d_mixture_inference](b ) shows the results for the average number of inferred components as the amount of data increases . our search method , on average , infers the true mixture when the sample size is @xmath317 . however , the search method of @xcite requires larger amounts of data ; even with a sample size of 2000 , the average number of inferred components is @xmath318 . in fig . [ fig : gaussian_10d_mixture_inference](b ) , the red curve reaches the true number of 2 and saturates more rapidly than the blue curve . one of the drawbacks associated with the search method of @xcite is due to the form of the updating expression for the component weights ( equation ) . as discussed in section [ subsubsec : fj_search_drawbacks ] , a particular instance of wrong inference is bound to happen when the net membership of a ( valid ) component is less than @xmath208 , where @xmath200 is the number of free parameters per component . in such a case , the component weight is updated as zero , and it is eliminated , effectively reducing the mixture size by one . we conducted the following experiment to demonstrate this behaviour : we considered the two - component 10-variate mixture @xmath288 as before and randomly generate samples of size 50 from the mixture . since the constituent components of @xmath288 have equal weights , on average , each component has a membership of 25 . we used @xmath319 , so that the two components are well apart from each other . for each @xmath303 , we run 50 simulations and analyze the number of inferred components . as expected , the search method of @xcite always infer a mixture with one component regardless of the separation @xmath303 . our method always infers the correct number of components . in order to test the validity of mixtures inferred by our proposed method , we analyze the resultant mixtures by comparing the message lengths as discussed in section [ subsec : comparison_mixtures ] . [ fig : gaussian_10d_msglens_comparisons_exp2b](a ) shows the difference in message lengths @xmath306 given in equation . we observe that @xmath295 for all @xmath303 . this demonstrates that our search based mixtures @xmath291 have lower message lengths compared to mixtures @xmath292 using our scoring function . the same phenomenon is observed when using the mml - like scoring function of @xcite . in fig . [ fig : gaussian_10d_msglens_comparisons_exp2b](b ) , we observe that @xmath314 , which means our search based mixtures @xmath291 have lower message lengths compared to mixtures @xmath292 when evaluated using their scoring function . r0.45 this demonstrates that @xmath291 is a better mixture as compared to @xmath292 and their search method is unable to infer it . we also note that the differences in message lengths increases with increasing @xmath303 . this is because for the one - component inferred mixture @xmath292 , the second part of the message ( equation ) which corresponds to the negative log - likelihood term increases because of poorer fit to the data . the two modes in the data become increasingly pronounced as the separation between constituent components of the true mixture increases , and hence , modelling such a distribution using a one - component mixture results in a poorer fit . this is clearly an incorrect inference . we further strengthen our case by comparing the kl - divergence of the inferred mixtures @xmath291 and @xmath292 with respect to the true mixture . [ fig : gaussian_10d_kldiv_comparisons_exp2b ] illustrates the results . as @xmath303 increases , the blue coloured plots shift higher . these correspond to mixtures @xmath292 inferred by @xcite . our search method , however , infers mixtures @xmath291 which have lower kl - divergence . the figure indicates that the inferred mixtures @xmath291 are more similar to the true distribution as compared to mixtures @xmath292 . these experiments demonstrate the ability of our search method to perform better than the widely used method of @xcite . we compared the resulting mixtures using our proposed mml formulation and the mml - like formulation of @xcite , showing the advantages of the former over the latter . we also used a neutral metric , kl - divergence , to establish the closeness of our inferred mixtures to the true distributions . we will now illustrate the behaviour of our search method on two real world datasets . at any intermediate stage of the search procedure , current _ mixture with @xmath4 components requires @xmath4 number of split , delete , and merge operations before it is updated . each of the perturbations involve performing an em to optimize the corresponding mixture parameters . to determine the convergence of em , we used a threshold of @xmath320 which was the same as used by @xcite . fj s method also requires to start from an initial large number of components . we used 25 as an initial number based on what was suggested in @xcite . we investigate the number of times the em routine is called and compare it with that of @xcite . we examine with respect to the simulations that were carried out previously . for the bivariate mixture discussed in section [ subsec : bivariate_mix_simulation ] , the number of resulting em iterations when the sample sizes are @xmath299 and @xmath308 are compared in fig . [ fig : em_iterations](a ) , ( b ) respectively . as per the discussion in section [ subsec : bivariate_mix_simulation ] , at @xmath299 , the average number of components inferred by the two methods are about the same ( fig . [ fig : gaussian_2d_mixture_inference](a ) ) . however , the number of em iterations required by fj s method is greater than 200 across all values of @xmath303 ( fig . [ fig : em_iterations](a ) ) . in contrast , the proposed method , on average , requires fewer than 50 iterations . in this case , both methods produce a similar result with fj s method requiring more number of em iterations . when the bivariate mixture simulation is carried out using @xmath308 , the number of em iterations required by fj s method , on average , is greater than 100 , while the proposed method requires fewer than 40 iterations ( fig . [ fig : em_iterations](b ) ) . in this case , the proposed method not only infers better mixtures ( as discussed in section [ subsec : bivariate_mix_simulation ] ) but is also conservative with respect to computational cost . for the simulation results corresponding to the 10-variate mixtures in section [ subsec:10d_mix_simulation ] , the proposed method requires close to 50 iterations on average , while fj s method requires about 20 ( fig . [ fig : em_iterations](c ) ) . however , the mixtures inferred by the proposed method fare better when compared to that of fj ( figs . [ fig : gaussian_10d_mixture_inference ] , [ fig : gaussian_10d_comparisons ] ) . furthermore , for the simulation results explained in section [ subsec : fj_weight_updates_exp2b ] , fj s method stops after 3 em iterations . this is because their program does not accommodate components when the memberships are less than @xmath208 . the proposed method requires 18 em iterations on average and infers the correct mixture components . in these two cases , our method infers better quality mixtures , with no significant overhead with regard to the computational cost . the first example is the univariate _ acidity _ data set which contains 155 points . our proposed search method infers a mixture @xmath291 with 2 components whereas the search method of @xcite infers a mixture @xmath292 with 3 components . the inferred mixtures are shown in fig . [ fig : acidity ] and their corresponding parameter estimates are given in table [ tab : acidity_mixtures_inference ] . in order to compare the mixtures inferred by the two search methods , we compute the message lengths of the inferred mixtures using our complete mml and the approximated mml - like scoring functions . when evaluated using our mml scoring function , our inferred mixture results in a gain of @xmath321 bits ( see table [ tab : acidity_comparison ] ) . based on the mml framework , our two - component mixture @xmath291 is @xmath322 times more likely than the three - component mixture @xmath292 ( as per equation ) . furthermore , when the inferred mixtures are evaluated as per the mml - like scoring function , @xmath291 is still considered better ( @xmath323 bits ) than @xmath292 ( @xmath324 bits ) . thus , using both forms of scoring function , @xmath291 is the better mixture model of this data set . [ tab : acidity_mixtures_inference ] .message lengths ( measured in bits ) of the mixtures ( in fig . [ fig : acidity ] ) as evaluated using the mml and mml - like scoring functions . [ cols="^,^,^ " , ] [ tab : null_models_comparison ] the per residue statistic is calculated by dividing the total message length by the sample size ( the number of @xmath325 pairs ) . this statistic shows that close to 2.5 bits can be saved ( on average ) if the protein data is encoded using the vmf null model . the vmf null model thus supercedes the naive model of encoding . this can potentially improve the accuracy of statistical inference that is central to the various protein modelling tasks briefly introduced above . we presented a statistically robust approach for inferring mixtures of ( i ) multivariate gaussian distributions , and ( ii ) von mises - fisher distributions for @xmath3-dimensional directional data . it is based on the general information - theoretic framework of minimum message length inference . this provides an objective tradeoff between the hypothesis complexity and the quality of fit to the data . an associated search procedure for an optimal mixture model of given data chooses the number of component distributions , @xmath4 , by minimizing the total message length . we established the better performance of the proposed search algorithm by comparing with a popularly used search method @xcite . we demonstrated the effectiveness of our approach through extensive experimentation and validation of our results . we also applied our method to real - world high dimensonal text data and to directional data that arises from protein chain conformations . the experimental results demonstrate that our proposed method fares better when compared with the current state of the art techniques . the authors would like to thank arun konagurthu for discussions pertaining to protein data clustering , and maria garcia de la banda for stimulating discussions and providing interesting insights . the authors would also like to acknowledge wray buntine s inputs with regard to text clustering . 91 [ 1]#1 [ 1]#1 urlstyle [ 1]doi # 1 [ 2][]#2 agusta y , dowe dl ( 2003 ) unsupervised learning of correlated multivariate gaussian mixture models using mml . in : ai 2003 : advances in artificial intelligence , springer , berlin , heidelberg , pp 477489 akaike h ( 1974 ) a new look at the statistical model identification . ieee transactions on automatic control , 19(6):716723 anderson e ( 1935 ) the irises of the gasp peninsula . bulletin of the american iris society 59:25 banerjee a , dhillon i , ghosh j , sra s ( 2003 ) generative model - based clustering of directional data . in : proceedings of the 9th international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining , acm , new york , pp 1928 banerjee a , dhillon is , ghosh j , sra s ( 2005 ) clustering on the unit hypersphere using von mises - fisher distributions . journal of machine learning research 6:13451382 barton de ( 1961 ) unbiased estimation of a set of probabilities . biometrika 48(1 - 2):227229 basu ap ( 1964 ) estimates of reliability for some distributions useful in life testing . technometrics 6(2):215219 best d , fisher n ( 1981 ) the bias of the maximum likelihood estimators of the von mises - fisher concentration parameters . communications in statistics - simulation and computation 10(5):493502 biernacki c , celeux g , govaert g ( 2000 ) assessing a mixture model for clustering with the integrated completed likelihood . ieee transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence 22(7):719725 bishop cm ( 2006 ) pattern recognition and machine learning , vol 1 . springer , new york boulton d , wallace c ( 1969 ) the information content of a multistate distribution . journal of theoretical biology 23:269278 bozdogan h ( 1983 ) determining the number of component clusters in the standard multivariate normal mixture model using model - selection criteria . tech . rep . , dtic document bozdogan h ( 1990 ) on the information - based measure of covariance complexity and its application to the evaluation of multivariate linear models . communications in statistics - theory and methods 19(1):221278 bozdogan h ( 1993 ) choosing the number of component clusters in the mixture - model using a new informational complexity criterion of the inverse - fisher information matrix . springer , berlin , heidelberg burnham kp , anderson dr ( 2002 ) model selection and multimodel inference : a practical information - theoretic approach . springer , new york collier jh , allison l , lesk am , de la banda mg , konagurthu as ( 2014 ) a new statistical framework to assess structural alignment quality using information compression . bioinformatics 30(17):i512i518 conway jh , sloane nja ( 1984 ) on the voronoi regions of certain lattices . siam journal on algebraic and discrete methods 5:294305 cordeiro gm , vasconcellos kl ( 1999 ) theory & methods : second - order biases of the maximum likelihood estimates in von mises regression models . australian & new zealand journal of statistics 41(2):189198 dempster ap , laird nm , rubin db ( 1977 ) maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the em algorithm . journal of the royal statistical society : series b ( methodological ) 39(1):138 dowe dl , allison l , dix ti , hunter l , wallace cs , edgoose t ( 1996 ) circular clustering of protein dihedral angles by minimum message length . in : pacific symposium on biocomputing , vol 96 , pp 242255 dowe dl , oliver jj , baxter ra , wallace cs ( 1996 ) bayesian estimation of the von mises concentration parameter . in : maximum entropy and bayesian methods , springer , netherlands , pp 5160 dowe dl , oliver jj , wallace cs ( 1996 ) mml estimation of the parameters of the spherical fisher distribution . in : algorithmic learning theory , springer , berlin , heidelberg , pp 213227 drton m , sturmfels b , sullivant s ( 2009 ) lectures on algebraic statistics . in : oberwolfach seminars ( 39 ) , birkhuser , basel dwyer ps ( 1967 ) some applications of matrix derivatives in multivariate analysis . journal of the american statistical association 62(318):607625 eaton ml , morris cn ( 1970 ) the application of invariance to unbiased estimation . the annals of mathematical statistics 41(5):17081716 figueiredo ams ( 2012 ) goodness - of - fit for a concentrated von mises - fisher distribution . computational statistics 27(1):6982 figueiredo ma , jain ak ( 2002 ) unsupervised learning of finite mixture models . ieee transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence 24(3):381396 fisher ni ( 1993 ) statistical analysis of spherical data . cambridge university press , cambridge fisher r ( 1953 ) dispersion on a sphere . proceedings of the royal society of london : series a ( mathematical and physical sciences ) 217(1130):295305 fisher ra ( 1936 ) the use of multiple measurements in taxonomic problems . annals of eugenics 7(2):179188 gauvain j , lee ch ( 1994 ) maximum a posteriori estimation for multivariate gaussian mixture observations of markov chains . ieee transactions on speech and audio processing 2(2):291298 gray g ( 1994 ) bias in misspecified mixtures . biometrics 50(2):457470 hornik k , grn b ( 2013 ) movmf : an r package for fitting mixtures of von mises - fisher distributions . r package version 01 - 2 jain ak , dubes rc ( 1988 ) algorithms for clustering data . prentice - hall , inc . , upper saddle river , nj , usa jain ak , duin rpw , mao j ( 2000 ) statistical pattern recognition : a review . ieee transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence 22(1):437 jeffreys h ( 1946 ) an invariant form for the prior probability in estimation problems . proceedings of the royal society of london : series a ( mathematical and physical sciences ) 186(1007):453461 jones p , mclachlan g ( 1990 ) laplace - normal mixtures fitted to wind shear data . journal of applied statistics 17(2):271276 jorgensen ma , mclachlan gj ( 2008 ) wallace s approach to unsupervised learning : the snob program . the computer journal 51(5):571578 kent jt ( 1982 ) the fisher - bingham distribution on the sphere . journal of the royal statistical society : series b ( methodological ) 44(1):7180 konagurthu as , lesk am , allison l ( 2012 ) minimum message length inference of secondary structure from protein coordinate data . bioinformatics 28(12):i97i105 konagurthu as , allison l , abramson d , stuckey pj , lesk am ( 2013 ) statistical inference of protein lego bricks " . in : 2013 ieee 13th international conference on data mining ( icdm ) , ieee , pp 10911096 krishnan t , mclachlan g ( 1997 ) the em algorithm and extensions . wiley , new york kullback s , leibler ra ( 1951 ) on information and sufficiency . the annals of mathematical statistics pp 7986 lee p ( 1997 ) bayesian statistics : an introduction . arnold , london . lo y ( 2011 ) bias from misspecification of the component variances in a normal mixture . computational statistics and data anaysis 55(9):27392747 magnus jr , neudecker h ( 1988 ) matrix differential calculus with applications in statistics and econometrics . wiley , new york mardia k , jupp p ( 2000 ) directional statistics . wiley , hoboken , nj , usa mardia k , holmes d , kent j ( 1984 ) a goodness - of - fit test for the von mises - fisher distribution . journal of the royal statistical society : series b ( methodological ) 46(1):7278 mardia kv , kent jt , bibby jm ( 1979 ) multivariate analysis . academic press , london mardia kv , taylor cc , subramaniam gk ( 2007 ) protein bioinformatics and mixtures of bivariate von mises distributions for angular data . biometrics 63(2):505512 mclachlan g , peel d ( 1997 ) contribution to the discussion of paper by s. richardson and p.j . journal of the royal statistical society b 59:779780 mclachlan g , peel d ( 2000 ) finite mixture models . wiley , new york mclachlan gj , basford ke ( 1988 ) mixture models : inference and applications to clustering ( statistics : textbooks and monographs ) . dekker , new york murzin a , brenner s , hubbard t , chothia c , et al . ( 1995 ) scop : a structural classification of proteins database for the investigation of sequences and structures . journal of molecular biology 247(4):536540 oliver j , baxter r ( 1994 ) mml and bayesianism : similarities and differences . dept comput sci monash univ , clayton , victoria , australia , tech rep 206 oliver jj , baxter ra , wallace cs ( 1996 ) unsupervised learning using mml . in : machine learning : proceedings of the 13th international conference , pp 364372 patra k , dey dk ( 1999 ) a multivariate mixture of weibull distributions in reliability modeling . statistics & probability letters 45(3):225235 peel d , mclachlan gj ( 2000 ) robust mixture modelling using the t - distribution . statistics and computing 10(4):339348 peel d , whiten wj , mclachlan gj ( 2001 ) fitting mixtures of kent distributions to aid in joint set identification . journal of the american statistical association 96(453):5663 rao cr ( 1973 ) linear statistical inference and its applications . wiley , new york richardson s , green pj ( 1997 ) on bayesian analysis of mixtures with an unknown number of components . journal of the royal statistical society : series b ( methodological ) 59(4):731792 rissanen j ( 1978 ) modeling by shortest data description . automatica 14(5):465471 rissanen j ( 1989 ) stochastic complexity in statistical inquiry theory . world scientific publishing co. , inc . , river edge , nj , usa roberts s , husmeier d , rezek i , penny w ( 1998 ) bayesian approaches to gaussian mixture modeling . ieee transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence 20(11):11331142 robertson s , zaragoza h ( 2009 ) the probabilistic relevance framework : bm25 and beyond . now publishers inc . , hanover , ma , usa salton g , buckley c ( 1988 ) term - weighting approaches in automatic text retrieval . information processing & management 24(5):513523 salton g , mcgill mj ( 1986 ) introduction to modern information retrieval . mcgraw - hill , inc . , new york , ny , usa schou g ( 1978 ) estimation of the concentration parameter in von mises fisher distributions . biometrika 65(2):369377 schwarz g , et al . ( 1978 ) estimating the dimension of a model . the annals of statistics 6(2):461464 seidel w , mosler k , alker m ( 2000 ) a cautionary note on likelihood ratio tests in mixture models . annals of the institute of statistical mathematics 52(3):481487 shannon ce ( 1948 ) a mathematical theory of communication . the bell system technical journal 27:379423 song h , liu j , wang g ( 2012 ) high - order parameter approximation for von mises fisher distributions . applied mathematics and computation 218(24):11,88011,890 sra s ( 2012 ) a short note on parameter approximation for von mises - fisher distributions : and a fast implementation of @xmath326 . computational statistics 27(1):177190 strehl a , ghosh j , mooney r ( 2000 ) impact of similarity measures on web - page clustering . in : workshop on artificial intelligence for web search ( aaai 2000 ) , pp 5864 taboga m ( 2012 ) lectures on probability theory and mathematical statistics . createspace independent pub . tanabe a , fukumizu k , oba s , takenouchi t , ishii s ( 2007 ) parameter estimation for von mises fisher distributions . computational statistics 22(1):145157 titterington dm , smith af , makov ue , et al . ( 1985 ) statistical analysis of finite mixture distributions . wiley , new york wallace c ( 1986 ) an improved program for classification . in : proceedings of the 9th australian computer science conference , pp 357366 wallace c ( 1990 ) classification by minimum - message - length inference . lecture notes in computer science , vol 468 , springer berlin heidelberg , pp 7281 wallace c , dowe d ( 1994 ) estimation of the von mises concentration parameter using minimum message length . in : proceedings of the 12th australian statistical society conference , monash university , australia wallace cs ( 2005 ) statistical and inductive inference using minimum message length . information science and statistics , springer - verlag , secaucus , nj , usa wallace cs , boulton dm ( 1968 ) an information measure for classification . computer journal 11(2):185194 wallace cs , dowe dl ( 1999 ) minimum message length and kolmogorov complexity . computer journal 42:270283 wallace cs , freeman pr ( 1987 ) estimation and inference by compact coding . journal of the royal statistical society : series b ( methodological ) 49(3):240265 wang p , puterman ml , cockburn i , le n ( 1996 ) mixed poisson regression models with covariate dependent rates . biometrics 52(2):381400 watson g , williams e ( 1956 ) on the construction of significance tests on the circle and the sphere . biometrika 43(3 - 4):344352 wedel m , desarbo ws , bult jr , ramaswamy v ( 1993 ) a latent class poisson regression model for heterogeneous count data . journal of applied econometrics 8(4):397411 white h ( 1982 ) maximum likelihood estimation of misspecified models . econometrica 50(1):125 wood at ( 1994 ) simulation of the von mises fisher distribution . communications in statistics - simulation and computation 23(1):157164 xu l , jordan mi ( 1996 ) on convergence properties of the em algorithm for gaussian mixtures . neural computation 8(1):129151 zhong s , ghosh j ( 2003 ) a comparative study of generative models for document clustering . in : proceedings of the workshop on clustering high dimensional data and its applications in siam data mining conference for brevity , we represent @xmath327 and @xmath328 as @xmath329 and @xmath330 respectively . expressions to evaluate @xmath331 and @xmath332 are given in equations ( [ eqn : ratio_bessels ] ) , ( [ eqn : ratio_first_derivative ] ) , and ( [ eqn : ratio_second_derivative ] ) respectively . we require @xmath330 for its use in the remainder of the derivation and we provide its expression below : @xmath333 now we discuss the derivation of @xmath121 and @xmath122 that are required for computing the mml estimate @xmath334 ( equations ( [ eqn : mml_newton_approx ] ) and ( [ eqn : mml_halley_approx ] ) ) . differentiating equation [ eqn : i_first_derivative ] , we have @xmath335 @xmath336 equations ( [ eqn : tmp1 ] ) and ( [ eqn : tmp2 ] ) can be used to evaluate @xmath121 and @xmath122 which can then be used to approximate the mml estimates @xmath123 and @xmath124 ( equations ( [ eqn : mml_newton_approx ] ) and ( [ eqn : mml_halley_approx ] ) respectively ) . to obtain the optimal weights under the constraint @xmath160 , the above equation is optimized using the _ lagrangian _ objective function defined below using some _ lagrangian multiplier _ @xmath341 . @xmath342 for some @xmath343 , the equation resulting from computing the partial derivative of @xmath344 with respect to @xmath345 and equating it to zero gives the optimal weight @xmath345 . @xmath346 @xmath347 where @xmath348 and @xmath349 are the responsibility and effective membership terms given as per equations and respectively . substituting the above value in equation , we have @xmath350 there are @xmath4 equations similar to equation for values of @xmath343 . adding all these equations together , we get @xmath351 substituting the above value of @xmath341 in equation , we get @xmath352 [ [ subsec : vmf_kldiv ] ] derivation of the kullback - leibler ( kl ) distance between two von mises - fisher distributions ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ the closed form expression to calculate the kl divergence between two vmf distributions is presented below . let @xmath353 and @xmath354 be two von mises - fisher distributions with mean directions @xmath355 and concentration parameters @xmath356 . the kl distance between any two distributions is given by @xmath357 \label{eqn : kldiv}\ ] ] where @xmath358 $ ] is the expectation of the quantity @xmath359 $ ] using the probability density function @xmath17 . @xmath360 using the fact that @xmath361 = a_d(\kappa_1)\boldsymbol{\mu_1}$ ] @xcite , we have the following expression : @xmath362 & = \log\frac{c_d(\kappa_1)}{c_d(\kappa_2 ) } + ( \kappa_1\boldsymbol{\mu_1 } -\kappa_2\boldsymbol{\mu_2})^t a_d(\kappa_1 ) \boldsymbol{\mu_1 } \notag\\ d_{kl}(f||g ) & = \log\frac{c_d(\kappa_1)}{c_d(\kappa_2 ) } + a_d(\kappa_1 ) ( \kappa_1 -\kappa_2\boldsymbol{\mu_1}^t\boldsymbol{\mu_2 } ) \label{eqn : vmf_kldiv}\end{aligned}\ ] ] we consider an example of a mixture with overlapping components and employ the proposed search method to determine the number of mixture components . @xcite considered the mixture shown in fig . [ fig : mix2 ] which is described as follows : let @xmath363 be the weight , mean , and covariance matrix of the @xmath364 component respectively . then , the mixture parameters are given as @xmath365 0.5 & 1 \end{bmatrix } , \mathbf{c}_2 = \begin{bmatrix } 6 & -2 \\[0.3em ] -2 & 6 \end{bmatrix},\ , \mathbf{c}_3 = \begin{bmatrix } 2 & -1 \\[0.3em ] -1 & 2 \end{bmatrix},\ , \mathbf{c}_4 = \begin{bmatrix } 0.125 & 0 \\[0.3em ] 0 & 0.125 \end{bmatrix}\end{gathered}\ ] ] we generate a random sample of size 1000 ( similar to @xcite ) and infer mixtures using the proposed heuristic . below are diagrams which portray the splitting of the individual components . we show a selection of operations which result in improved mixtures . Abstract:

Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.

Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered . Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video . Paper: there are many routes to minkowski space . but the most physical one still seems to me via the law of inertia . and even along these lines alternative approaches exist . many papers were published in physics and mathematics journals over the last 100 years in which incremental progress was reported as regards the minimal set of hypotheses from which the structure of minkowski space could be deduced . one could imagine a hesse - diagram - like picture in which all these contributions ( being the nodes ) together with their logical dependencies ( being the directed links ) were depicted . it would look surprisingly complex . from a general - relativistic point of view , minkowski space just models an _ empty _ spacetime , that is , a spacetime devoid of any material content . it is worth keeping in mind , that this was not minkowski s view . close to the beginning of _ raum und zeit _ he stated : _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ in order to not leave a yawning void , we wish to imagine that at every place and at every time something perceivable exists . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ this already touches upon a critical point . our modern theoretical view of spacetime is much inspired by the typical hierarchical thinking of mathematics of the late 19th and first half of the 20th century , in which the _ set _ comes first , and then we add various structures on it . we first think of spacetime as a set and then structure it according to various physical inputs . but what are the elements of this set ? recall how georg cantor , in his first article on transfinite set - theory , defined a set : von bestimmten wohlunterschiedenen objecten @xmath0 unserer anschauung oder unseres denkens ( welche die ` elemente ' von @xmath1 genannt werden ) zu einem ganzen . '' ( @xcite , p.481 ) ] _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ by a ` set ' we understand any gathering - together @xmath1 of determined well - distinguished objects @xmath0 of our intuition or of our thinking ( which are called the ` elements ' of @xmath1 ) into a whole . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ do we think of spacetime points as `` determined well - distinguished objects of our intuition or of our thinking '' ? i think minkowski felt a need to do so , as his statement quoted above indicates , and also saw the problematic side of it : if we mentally individuate the points ( elements ) of spacetime , we as physicists have no other means to do so than to fill up spacetime with actual matter , hoping that this could be done in such a diluted fashion that this matter will not dynamically affect the processes that we are going to describe . in other words : the whole concept of a rigid background spacetime is , from its very beginning , based on an assumption of at best approximate validity . it is important to realise that this does not necessarily refer to general relativity : even if the need to incorporate gravity by a variable and matter - dependent spacetime geometry did not exist would the concept of a rigid background spacetime be of approximate nature , _ provided we think of spacetime points as individuated by actual physical events_. it is true that modern set theory regards cantor s original definition as too nave , and that for good reasons . it allows too many `` gatherings - together '' with self - contradictory properties , as exemplified by the infamous _ antinomies _ of classical set theory . also , modern set theory deliberately stands back from any characterisation of elements in order to not confuse the axioms themselves with their possible _ interpretations_. however , applications to physics require _ interpreted _ axioms , where it remains true that elements of sets are thought of as definite as in cantors original definition . modern textbooks on special relativity have little to say about this , though an increasing unease seems to raise its voice from certain directions in the philosophy - of - science community ; see , e.g. , @xcite@xcite . physicists sometimes tend to address points of spacetime as _ potential events _ , but that always seemed to me like poetry , begging the question how a mere potentiality is actually used for individuation . to me the right attitude seems to admit that the operational justification of the notion of spacetime events is only approximately possible , but nevertheless allow it as primitive element of theorising . the only thing to keep in mind is to not take mathematical rigour for ultimate physical validity . the purpose of mathematical rigour is rather to establish the tightest possible bonds between basic assumptions ( axioms ) and decidable consequences . only then can we in principle learn anything through falsification . the last remark opens another general issue , which is implicit in much of theoretical research , namely how to balance between attempted rigour in drawing consequences and attempted closeness to reality when formulating once starting platform ( at the expense of rigour when drawing consequences ) . as the mathematical physicists glance & wightman once formulated it in a different context ( that of superselection rules in quantum mechanics ) : _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ the theoretical results currently available fall into two categories : rigorous results on approximate models and approximate results in realistic models . _ ( @xcite , p.204 ) _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ to me this seems to be the generic situation in theoretical physics . in that respect , minkowski space is certainly an approximate model , but to a very good approximation indeed : as global model of spacetime if gravity plays no dynamical rle , and as local model of spacetime in far more general situations . this justifies looking at some of its rich mathematical structures in detail . some mathematical background material is provided in the appendices . consider first the general situation where one is given a set @xmath2 . without any further structure being specified , the _ automorphisms _ group of @xmath2 would be the group of bijections of @xmath2 , i.e. maps @xmath3 which are injective ( into ) and surjective ( onto ) . it is called @xmath4 , where ` perm ' stands for ` permutations ' . now endow @xmath2 with some structure @xmath5 ; for example , it could be an equivalence relation on @xmath2 , that is , a partition of @xmath2 into an exhaustive set of mutually disjoint subsets ( cf . sect.[sec : groupactions ] ) . the automorphism group of @xmath6 is then the subgroup of @xmath7 that preserves @xmath5 . note that @xmath8 contains only those maps @xmath9 preserving @xmath5 whose inverse , @xmath10 , also preserve @xmath5 . now consider another structure , @xmath11 , and form @xmath12 . one way in which the two structures @xmath5 and @xmath11 may be compared is to compare their automorphism groups @xmath8 and @xmath12 . comparing the latter means , in particular , to see whether one is contained in the other . containedness clearly defines a partial order relation on the set of subgroups of @xmath4 , which we can use to define a partial order on the set of structures . one structure , @xmath5 , is said to be strictly stronger than ( or equally strong as ) another structure , @xmath11 , in symbols @xmath13 , iff the automorphism group of the former is properly contained in ( or is equal to ) the automorphism group of the latter . here . ] in symbols : @xmath14 . note that in this way of speaking a substructure ( i.e. one being defined by a subset of conditions , relations , objects , etc . ) of a given structure is said to be weaker than the latter . this way of thinking of structures in terms of their automorphism group is adopted from felix klein s _ erlanger programm _ @xcite in which this strategy is used in an attempt to classify and compare geometries . this general procedure can be applied to minkowski space , endowed with its usual structure ( see below ) . we can than ask whether the automorphism group of minkowski space , which we know is the inhomogeneous lorentz group @xmath15 , also called the poincar group , is already the automorphism group of a proper substructure . if this were the case we would say that the original structure is redundant . it would then be of interest to try and find a minimal set of structures that already imply the poincar group . this can be done by trial and error : one starts with some more or less obvious substructure , determine its automorphism group , and compare it to the poincar group . generically it will turn out larger , i.e. to properly contain @xmath15 . the obvious questions to ask then are : how much larger ? and : what would be a minimal extra condition that eliminates the difference ? these questions have been asked in connection with various substructures of minkowski space , whose definition is as follows : [ def : minkowskispace ] * minkowski space * of @xmath16 dimensions , denoted by @xmath17 , is a real @xmath18-dimensional affine space , whose associated real @xmath18-dimensional vector space @xmath19 is endowed with a non - degenerate symmetric bilinear form @xmath20 of signature @xmath21 ( i.e. there exists a basis @xmath22 of @xmath19 such that @xmath23 ) . @xmath17 is also endowed with the standard differentiable structure of @xmath24 . we refer to appendix[sec : affinespaces ] for the definition of affine spaces . note also that the last statement concerning differentiable structures is put in in view of the strange fact that just for the physically most interesting case , @xmath25 , there exist many inequivalent differentiable structures of @xmath26 . finally we stress that , at this point , we did not endow minkowski space with an orientation or time orientation . [ def : poincaregroup ] the * poincar group * in @xmath16 dimensions , which is the same as the * inhomogeneous lorentz group * in @xmath16 dimensions and therefore will be denoted by @xmath27 , is that subgroup of the general affine group of real @xmath18-dimensional affine space , for which the uniquely associated linear maps @xmath28 are elements of the lorentz group @xmath29 , that is , preserve @xmath30 in the sense that @xmath31 for all @xmath32 . see appendix[sec : affinemaps ] for the definition of affine maps and the general affine group . again we stress that since we did not endow minkowski space with any orientation , the poincar group as defined here would not respect any such structure . as explained in [ sec : affineframes ] , any choice of an affine frame allows us to identify the general affine group in @xmath18 dimensions with the semi - direct product @xmath33 . that identification clearly depends on the choice of the frame . if we restrict the bases to those where @xmath23 , then @xmath27 can be identified with @xmath34 . we can further endow minkowski space with an _ orientation _ and , independently , a _ time orientation_. an orientation of an affine space is equivalent to an orientation of its associated vector space @xmath19 . a time orientation is also defined trough a time orientation of @xmath19 , which is explained below . the subgroup of the poincar group preserving the overall orientation is denoted by @xmath35 ( proper poincar group ) , the one preserving time orientation by @xmath36 ( orthochronous poincar group ) , and @xmath37 denotes the subgroup preserving both ( proper orthochronous poincar group ) . upon the choice of a basis we may identify @xmath35 with @xmath38 and @xmath37 with @xmath39 , where @xmath40 is the component of the identity of @xmath41 . let us add a few more comments about the elementary geometry of minkowski space . we introduce the following notations : @xmath42 we shall also simply write @xmath43 for @xmath44 . a vector @xmath45 is called _ timelike , lightlike _ , or _ spacelike _ according to @xmath43 being @xmath46 , @xmath47 , or @xmath48 respectively . non - spacelike vectors are also called _ causal _ and their set , @xmath49 , is called the _ causal - doublecone_. its interior , @xmath50 , is called the _ chronological - doublecone _ and its boundary , @xmath51 , the _ light - doublecone _ : [ eq : vecdc ] @xmath52 a linear subspace @xmath53 is called timelike , lightlike , or spacelike according to @xmath54 being indefinite , negative semi - definite but not negative definite , or negative definite respectively . instead of the usual cauchy - schwarz - inequality we have [ eq : cauchyschwarz ] @xmath55 given a set @xmath56 ( not necessarily a subspace ) , its @xmath30-orthogonal complement is the subspace @xmath57 if @xmath45 is lightlike then @xmath58 . in fact , @xmath59 is the unique lightlike hyperplane ( cf . sect.[sec : affinespaces ] ) containing @xmath60 . in this case the hyperplane @xmath59 is called degenerate because the restriction of @xmath30 to @xmath59 is degenerate . on the other hand , if @xmath60 is timelike / spacelike @xmath59 is spacelike / timelike and @xmath61 . now the hyperplane @xmath59 is called non - degenerate because the restriction of @xmath30 to @xmath59 is non - degenerate . given any subset @xmath56 , we can attach it to a point @xmath62 in @xmath63 : @xmath64 in particular , the causal- , chronological- , and light - doublecones at @xmath65 are given by : [ eq : affdc ] @xmath66 if @xmath67 is a subspace of @xmath19 then @xmath68 is an affine subspace of @xmath63 over @xmath67 . if @xmath67 is time- , light- , or spacelike then @xmath68 is also called time- , light- , or spacelike . of particular interest are the hyperplanes @xmath69 which are timelike , lightlike , or spacelike according to @xmath60 being spacelike , lightlike , or timelike respectively . two points @xmath70 are said to be timelike- , lightlike- , or spacelike separated if the line joining them ( equivalently : the vector @xmath71 ) is timelike , lightlike , or spacelike respectively . non - spacelike separated points are also called causally separated and the line though them is called a causal line . it is easy to show that the relation @xmath72 defines an equivalence relation ( cf . [ sec : groupactions ] ) on the set of timelike vectors . ( only transitivity is non - trivial , i.e. if @xmath73 and @xmath74 then @xmath75 . to show this , decompose @xmath76 and @xmath77 into their components parallel and perpendicular to @xmath60 . ) each of the two equivalence classes is a _ cone _ in @xmath19 , that is , a subset closed under addition and multiplication with positive numbers . vectors in the same class are said to have the same time orientation . in the same fashion , the relation @xmath78 defines an equivalence relation on the set of causal vectors , with both equivalence classes being again cones . the existence of these equivalence relations is expressed by saying that @xmath63 is _ time orientable_. picking one of the two possible time orientations is then equivalent to specifying a single timelike reference vector , @xmath79 , whose equivalence class of directions may be called the _ future_. this being done we can speak of the future ( or forward , indicated by a superscript @xmath80 ) and past ( or backward , indicated by a superscript @xmath81 ) cones : [ eq : vecc ] @xmath82 note that @xmath83 and @xmath84 . usually @xmath85 is called the future and @xmath86 the past lightcone . mathematically speaking this is an abuse of language since , in contrast to @xmath87 and @xmath88 , they are not cones : they are each invariant ( as sets ) under multiplication with positive real numbers , but adding to vectors in @xmath89 will result in a vector in @xmath88 unless the vectors were parallel . as before , these cones can be attached to the points in @xmath63 . we write in a straightforward manner : [ eq : affc ] @xmath90 the cauchy - schwarz inequalities ( [ eq : cauchyschwarz ] ) result in various generalised triangle - inequalities . clearly , for spacelike vectors , one just has the ordinary triangle inequality . but for causal or timelike vectors one has to distinguish the cases according to the relative time orientations . for example , for timelike vectors of equal time orientation , one obtains the reversed triangle inequality : @xmath91 with equality iff @xmath60 and @xmath77 are parallel . it expresses the geometry behind the ` twin paradox ' . sometimes a minkowski ` distance function ' @xmath92 is introduced through @xmath93 clearly this is not a distance function in the ordinary sense , since it is neither true that @xmath94 nor that @xmath95 for all @xmath96 . in this section we consider general isometries of minkowski space . by this we mean general bijections @xmath97 ( no requirement like continuity or even linearity is made ) which preserve the minkowski distance ( [ eq : def : minkowskidistance ] ) as well as the time or spacelike character ; hence @xmath98 poincar transformations form a special class of such isometries , namely those which are affine . are there non - affine isometries ? one might expect a whole pandora s box full of wild ( discontinuous ) ones . but , fortunately , they do not exist : any map @xmath28 satisfying @xmath99 for all @xmath60 must be linear . as a warm up , we show [ thm : nowildisometries ] let @xmath28 be a surjection ( no further conditions ) so that @xmath100 for all @xmath32 , then @xmath9 is linear . consider @xmath101 . surjectivity allows to write @xmath102 , so that @xmath103 , which vanishes for all @xmath104 . hence @xmath105 for all @xmath106 , which by non - degeneracy of @xmath30 implies the linearity of @xmath9 . this shows in particular that any bijection @xmath97 of minkowski space whose associated map @xmath28 , defined by @xmath107 for some chosen basepoint @xmath108 , preserves the minkowski metric must be a poincar transformation . as already indicated , this result can be considerably strengthened . but before going into this , we mention a special and important class of linear isometries of @xmath109 , namely reflections at non - degenerate hyperplanes . the reflection at @xmath59 is defined by @xmath110 their significance is due to the following let the dimension of @xmath19 be @xmath18 . any isometry of @xmath109 is the composition of at most @xmath18 reflections . comprehensive proofs may be found in @xcite or @xcite . the easier proof for at most @xmath111 reflections is as follows : let @xmath112 be a linear isometry and @xmath45 so that @xmath113 ( which certainly exists ) . let @xmath114 , then @xmath115 so that @xmath116 and @xmath117 can not simultaneously have zero squares . so let @xmath118 ( understood as alternatives ) , then @xmath119 and @xmath120 . hence @xmath60 is eigenvector with eigenvalue @xmath121 of the linear isometry given by @xmath122 consider now the linear isometry @xmath123 on @xmath59 with induced bilinear form @xmath124 , which is non - degenerated due to @xmath113 . we conclude by induction : at each dimension we need at most two reflections to reduce the problem by one dimension . after @xmath125 steps we have reduced the problem to one dimension , where we need at most one more reflection . hence we need at most @xmath126 reflections which upon composition with @xmath112 produce the identity . here we use that any linear isometry in @xmath59 can be canonically extended to @xmath127 by just letting it act trivially on @xmath128 . note that this proof does not make use of the signature of @xmath30 . in fact , the theorem is true for any signatures ; it only depends on @xmath30 being symmetric and non degenerate . as already mentioned , theorem[thm : nowildisometries ] can be improved upon , in the sense that the hypothesis for the map being an isometry is replaced by the hypothesis that it merely preserve some relation that derives form the metric structure , but is not equivalent to it . in fact , there are various such relations which we first have to introduce . the family of cones @xmath129 defines a partial - order relation ( cf . sect.[sec : groupactions ] ) , denoted by @xmath130 , on spacetime as follows : @xmath131 iff @xmath132 , i.e. iff @xmath71 is causal and future pointing . similarly , the family @xmath133 defines a strict partial order , denoted by @xmath134 , as follows : @xmath135 iff @xmath136 , i.e. if @xmath71 is timelike and future pointing . there is a third relation , called @xmath137 , defined as follows : @xmath138 iff @xmath139 , i.e. @xmath62 is on the future lightcone at @xmath140 . it is not a partial order due to the lack of transitivity , which , in turn , is due to the lack of the lightcone being a cone ( in the proper mathematical sense explained above ) . replacing the future ( @xmath80 ) with the past ( @xmath81 ) cones gives the relations @xmath141 , @xmath142 , and @xmath143 . it is obvious that the action of @xmath144 ( spatial reflections are permitted ) on @xmath63 maps each of the six families of cones ( [ eq : affc ] ) into itself and therefore leave each of the six relations invariant . for example : let @xmath135 and @xmath145 , then @xmath146 and @xmath71 future pointing , but also @xmath147 and @xmath148 future pointing , hence @xmath149 . another set of ` obvious ' transformations of @xmath63 leaving these relations invariant is given by all dilations : @xmath150 where @xmath151 is the constant dilation - factor and @xmath152 the centre . this follows from @xmath153 , @xmath154 , and the positivity of @xmath155 . since translations are already contained in @xmath144 , the group generated by @xmath144 and all @xmath156 is the same as the group generated by @xmath144 and all @xmath156 for fixed @xmath0 . a seemingly difficult question is this : what are the most general transformations of @xmath63 that preserve those relations ? here we understand ` transformation ' synonymously with ` bijective map ' , so that each transformation @xmath9 has in inverse @xmath10 . ` preserving the relation ' is taken to mean that @xmath9 _ and _ @xmath10 preserve the relation . then the somewhat surprising answer to the question just posed is that , in three or more spacetime dimensions , there are no other such transformations besides those already listed : let @xmath157 stand for any of the relations @xmath158 and let @xmath159 be a bijection of @xmath63 with @xmath160 , such that @xmath161 implies @xmath162 and @xmath163 . then @xmath159 is the composition of an lorentz transformation in @xmath144 with a dilation . these results were proven by a.d.alexandrov and independently by e.c . a good review of alexandrov s results is @xcite ; zeeman s paper is @xcite . the restriction to @xmath160 is indeed necessary , as for @xmath164 the following possibility exists : identify @xmath165 with @xmath166 and the bilinear form @xmath167 , where @xmath168 . set @xmath169 and @xmath170 and define @xmath171 by @xmath172 , where @xmath173 is any smooth function with @xmath174 . this defines an orientation preserving diffeomorphism of @xmath166 which transforms the set of lines @xmath175 const . and @xmath176 const . respectively into each other . hence it preserves the families of cones ( [ eq : def : affcausalc ] ) . since these transformations need not be affine linear they are not generated by dilations and lorentz transformations . these results may appear surprising since without a continuity requirement one might expect all sorts of wild behaviour to allow for more possibilities . however , a little closer inspection reveals a fairly obvious reason for why continuity is implied here . consider the case in which a transformation @xmath159 preserves the families @xmath133 and @xmath177 . the open diamond - shaped sets ( usually just called ` open diamonds ' ) , @xmath178 are obviously open in the standard topology of @xmath63 ( which is that of @xmath179 ) . note that at least one of the intersections in ( [ eq : opendiamonds ] ) is always empty . conversely , is is also easy to see that each open set of @xmath63 contains an open diamond . hence the topology that is defined by taking the @xmath180 as sub - base ( the basis being given by their finite intersections ) is equivalent to the standard topology of @xmath63 . but , by hypothesis , @xmath159 and @xmath181 preserves the cones @xmath182 and therefore open sets , so that @xmath159 must , in fact , be a homeomorphism . there is no such _ obvious _ continuity input if one makes the strictly weaker requirement that instead of the cones ( [ eq : affc ] ) one only preserves the doublecones ( [ eq : affdc ] ) . does that allow for more transformations , except for the obvious time reflection ? the answer is again in the negative . the following result was shown by alexandrov ( see his review @xcite ) and later , in a different fashion , by borchers and hegerfeld @xcite : [ thm : borchershegerfeld ] let @xmath183 denote any of the relations : @xmath184 iff @xmath185 , @xmath184 iff @xmath186 , or @xmath184 iff @xmath187 . let @xmath159 be a bijection of @xmath63 with @xmath160 , such that @xmath184 implies @xmath188 and @xmath189 . then @xmath159 is the composition of an lorentz transformation in @xmath15 with a dilation . all this shows that , up to dilations , lorentz transformations can be characterised by the causal structure of minkowski space . let us focus on a particular sub - case of theorem[thm : borchershegerfeld ] , which says that any bijection @xmath159 of @xmath63 with @xmath160 , which satisfies @xmath190 must be the composition of a dilation and a transformation in @xmath15 . this is sometimes referred to as _ alexandrov s theorem_. it gives a precise answer to the following physical question : to what extent does the principle of the constancy of a finite speed of light _ alone _ determine the relativity group ? the answer is , that it determines it to be a subgroup of the 11-parameter group of poincar transformations and constant rescalings , which is as close to the poincar group as possibly imaginable . alexandrov s theorem is , to my knowledge , the closest analog in minkowskian geometry to the famous theorem of beckman and quarles @xcite , which refers to euclidean geometry and reads as follows under slightly weaker hypotheses : they allowed the map @xmath9 to be ` many - valued ' , that is , to be a map @xmath191 , where @xmath192 is the set of non - empty subsets of @xmath179 , such that @xmath193 for any @xmath194 and any @xmath195 . however , given the statement of theorem[thm : beckmanquarles ] , it is immediate that such ` many - valued maps ' must necessarily be single - valued . to see this , assume that @xmath196 has the two image points @xmath197 and define @xmath198 for @xmath199 such that @xmath200 for all @xmath201 and @xmath202 . then , according to theorem[thm : beckmanquarles ] , @xmath203 must both be euclidean motions . since they are continuous and coincide for all @xmath201 , they must also coincide at @xmath204 . ] : [ thm : beckmanquarles ] let @xmath179 for @xmath16 be endowed with the standard euclidean inner product @xmath205 . the associated norm is given by @xmath206 . let @xmath207 be any fixed positive real number and @xmath208 any map such that @xmath209 ; then @xmath9 is a euclidean motion , i.e. @xmath210 . note that there are three obvious points which let the result of beckman and quarles in euclidean space appear somewhat stronger than the theorem of alexandrov in minkowski space : * the conclusion of theorem[thm : beckmanquarles ] holds for _ any _ @xmath211 , whereas alexandrov s theorem singles out lightlike distances . * in theorem[thm : beckmanquarles ] , @xmath164 is not excluded . * in theorem[thm : beckmanquarles ] , @xmath9 is not required to be a bijection , so that we did not assume the existence of an inverse map @xmath10 . correspondingly , there is no assumption that @xmath10 also preserves the distance @xmath207 . in this subsection we wish to discuss the extent to which the law of inertia already determines the automorphism group of spacetime . the law of inertia privileges a subset of paths in spacetime form among all paths ; it defines a so - called _ path structure _ @xcite@xcite . these privileged paths correspond to the motions of privileged objects called _ free particles_. the existence of such privileged objects is by no means obvious and must be taken as a contingent and particularly kind property of nature . it has been known for long @xcite@xcite@xcite how to operationally construct timescales and spatial reference frames relative to which free particles will move uniformly and on straight lines respectively all of them ! ( a summary of these papers is given in @xcite . ) these special timescales and spatial reference frames were termed _ inertial _ by ludwig lange @xcite . their existence must again be taken as a very particular and very kind feature of nature . note that ` uniform in time ' and ` spatially straight ' together translate to ` straight in spacetime ' . we also emphasise that ` straightness ' of ensembles of paths can be characterised intrinsically , e.g. , by the desargues property @xcite . all this is true if free particles are given . we do not discuss at this point whether and how one should characterise them independently ( cf . @xcite ) . the spacetime structure so defined is usually referred to as _ projective_. it it not quite that of an affine space , since the latter provides in addition each straight line with a distinguished two - parameter family of parametrisations , corresponding to a notion of _ uniformity _ with which the line is traced through . such a privileged parametrisation of spacetime paths is not provided by the law of inertia , which only provides privileged parametrisations of spatial paths , which we already took into account in the projective structure of spacetime . instead , an affine structure of spacetime may once more be motivated by another contingent property of nature , shown by the existence of elementary clocks ( atomic frequencies ) which do define the same uniformity structure on inertial world lines all of them ! once more this is a highly non - trivial and very kind feature of nature . in this way we would indeed arrive at the statement that spacetime is an affine space . however , as we shall discuss in this subsection , the affine group already emerges as automorphism group of inertial structures without the introduction of elementary clocks . first we recall the main theorem of affine geometry . for that we make the following [ def : collineation ] three points in an affine space are called * collinear * iff they are contained in a single line . a map between affine spaces is called a * collineation * iff it maps each triple of collinear points to collinear points . note that in this definition no other condition is required of the map , like , e.g. , injectivity . the main theorem now reads as follows : [ thm : collareaffine ] a bijective collineation of a real affine space of dimension @xmath16 is necessarily an affine map . a proof may be found in @xcite . that the theorem is non - trivial can , e.g. , be seen from the fact that it is not true for complex affine spaces . the crucial property of the real number field is that it does not allow for a non - trivial automorphisms ( as field ) . a particular consequence of theorem[thm : collareaffine ] is that bijective collineation are necessarily continuous ( in the natural topology of affine space ) . this is of interest for the applications we have in mind for the following reason : consider the set @xmath212 of all lines in some affine space @xmath2 . @xmath212 has a natural topology induced from @xmath2 . theorem[thm : collareaffine ] now implies that bijective collineations of @xmath2 act as homeomorphism of @xmath212 . consider an open subset @xmath213 and the subset of all collineations that fix @xmath214 ( as set , not necessarily its points ) . then these collineations also fix the boundary @xmath215 of @xmath214 in @xmath212 . for example , if @xmath214 is the set of all timelike lines in minkowski space , i.e. , with a slope less than some chosen value relative to some fixed direction , then it follows that the bijective collineations which together with their inverse map timelike lines to timelike lines also maps the lightcone to the lightcone . it immediately follows that it must be the composition of a poincar transformation as a constant dilation . note that this argument also works in two spacetime dimensions , where the alexandrov - zeeman result does not hold . the application we have in mind is to inertial motions , which are given by lines in affine space . in that respect theorem[thm : collareaffine ] is not quite appropriate . its hypotheses are weaker than needed , insofar as it would suffice to require straight lines to be mapped to straight lines . but , more importantly , the hypotheses are also stronger than what seems physically justifiable , insofar as not every line is realisable by an inertial motion . in particular , one would like to know whether theorem[thm : collareaffine ] can still be derived by restricting to _ slow collineations _ , which one may define by the property that the corresponding lines should have a slope less than some non - zero angle ( in whatever measure , as long as the set of slow lines is open in the set of all lines ) from a given ( time-)direction . this is indeed the case , as one may show from going through the proof of theorem[thm : collareaffine ] . slightly easier to prove is the following : [ thm : timelikecollareaffine ] let @xmath159 be a bijection of real @xmath18-dimensional affine space that maps slow lines to slow lines , then @xmath159 is an affine map . a proof may be found in @xcite . if ` slowness ' is defined via the lightcone of a minkowski metric @xmath30 , one immediately obtains the result that the affine maps must be composed from poincar transformations and dilations . the reason is [ thm : samekernelpropto ] let @xmath19 be a finite dimensional real vector space of dimension @xmath16 and @xmath30 be a non - degenerate symmetric bilinear form on @xmath19 of signature @xmath21 . let @xmath216 be any other symmetric bilinear form on @xmath19 . the ` light cones ' for both forms are defined by @xmath217 and @xmath218 . suppose @xmath219 , then @xmath220 for some @xmath221 . let @xmath222 be a basis of @xmath19 such that @xmath223 . then @xmath224 for @xmath225 implies ( we write @xmath226 ) : @xmath227 and @xmath228 . further , @xmath229 for @xmath230 then implies @xmath231 for @xmath232 . hence @xmath220 with @xmath233 . this can be applied as follows : if @xmath234 is affine and maps lightlike lines to lightlike lines , then the associated linear map @xmath28 maps lightlike vectors to lightlike vectors . hence @xmath235 vanishes if @xmath236 vanishes and therefore @xmath237 by lemma[thm : samekernelpropto ] . since @xmath238 is timelike if @xmath60 is timelike , @xmath239 is positive . hence we may define @xmath240 and have @xmath241 for all @xmath242 , saying that @xmath243 is a lorentz transformation . @xmath9 is the composition of a lorentz transformation and a dilation by @xmath244 . as is well known , the two main ingredients in special relativity are the principle of relativity ( henceforth abbreviated by pr ) and the principle of the constancy of light . we have seen above that , due to alexandrov s theorem , the latter almost suffices to arrive at the poincar group . in this section we wish to address the complementary question : under what conditions and to what extent can the rp _ alone _ justify the poincar group ? this question was first addressed by ignatowsky @xcite , who showed that under a certain set of technical assumptions ( not consistently spelled out by him ) the rp alone suffices to arrive at a spacetime symmetry group which is either the inhomogeneous galilei or the inhomogeneous lorentz group , the latter for some yet undetermined limiting velocity @xmath245 . more precisely , what is actually shown in this fashion is , as we will see , that the relativity group must contain either the proper orthochronous galilei or lorentz group , if the group is required to comprise at least spacetime translations , spatial rotations , and boosts ( velocity transformations ) . what we hence gain is the group - theoretic insight of how these transformations must combine into a common group , given that they form a group at all . we do not learn anything about other transformations , like spacetime reflections or dilations , whose existence we neither required nor ruled out at this level . the work of ignatowsky was put into a logically more coherent form by franck & rothe @xcite@xcite , who showed that some of the technical assumptions could be dropped . further formal simplifications were achieved by berzi & gorini @xcite . below we shall basically follow their line of reasoning , except that we do not impose the continuity of the transformations as a requirement , but conclude it from their preservation of the inertial structure plus bijectivity . see also @xcite for an alternative discussion on the level of lie algebras . for further determination of the automorphism group of spacetime we invoke the following principles : * homogeneity of spacetime . * isotropy of space . * galilean principle of relativity . we take st1 to mean that the sought - for group should include all translations and hence be a subgroup of the general affine group . with respect to some chosen basis , it must be of the form @xmath246 , where @xmath247 is a subgroup of @xmath248 . st2 is interpreted as saying that @xmath249 should include the set of all spatial rotations . if , with respect to some frame , we write the general element @xmath250 in a @xmath251 split form ( thinking of the first coordinate as time , the other three as space ) , we want @xmath247 to include all @xmath252 finally , st3 says that velocity transformations , henceforth called ` boosts ' , are also contained in @xmath247 . however , at this stage we do not know how boosts are to be represented mathematically . let us make the following assumptions : * boosts @xmath253 are labelled by a vector @xmath254 , where @xmath255 is the open ball in @xmath256 of radius @xmath245 . the physical interpretation of @xmath257 shall be that of the boost velocity , as measured in the system from which the transformation is carried out . we allow @xmath245 to be finite or infinite ( @xmath258 ) . @xmath259 corresponds to the identity transformation , i.e. @xmath260 . we also assume that @xmath257 , considered as coordinate function on the group , is continuous . * as part of st2 we require equivariance of boosts under rotations : @xmath261 the latter assumption allows us to restrict attention to boost in a fixed direction , say that of the positive @xmath262-axis . once their analytical form is determined as function of @xmath60 , where @xmath263 , we deduce the general expression for boosts using ( [ eq : equivboostsrot ] ) and ( [ eq : so3imbedding ] ) . we make no assumptions involving space reflections . ) explicitly , though they all use it ( implicitly ) , usually in statements to the effect that it is sufficient to consider boosts in one fixed direction . once this restriction is effected , a one - dimensional spatial reflection transformation is considered to relate a boost transformation to that with opposite velocity . this then gives the impression that reflection equivariance is also invoked , though this is not necessary in spacetime dimensions greater than two , for ( [ eq : equivboostsrot ] ) allows to invert one axis through a 180-degree rotation about a perpendicular one . ] we now restrict attention to @xmath263 . we wish to determine the most general form of @xmath253 compatible with all requirements put so far . we proceed in several steps : 1 . using an arbitrary rotation @xmath264 around the @xmath262-axis , so that @xmath265 , equation ( [ eq : equivboostsrot ] ) allows to prove that @xmath266 where here we wrote the @xmath267 matrix in a @xmath268 decomposed form . ( i.e. @xmath269 is a @xmath270 matrix and @xmath271 is the @xmath270 unit - matrix ) . applying ( [ eq : equivboostsrot ] ) once more , this time using a @xmath272-rotation about the @xmath273-axis , we learn that @xmath239 is an even function , i.e. @xmath274 below we will see that @xmath275 . 2 . let us now focus on @xmath276 , which defines the action of the boost in the @xmath277 plane . we write @xmath278 we refer to the system with coordinates @xmath279 as @xmath280 and that with coordinates @xmath281 as @xmath282 . from ( [ eq : formboost3 ] ) and the inverse ( which is elementary to compute ) one infers that the velocity @xmath60 of @xmath282 with respect to @xmath280 and the velocity @xmath283 of @xmath280 with respect to @xmath282 are given by + [ eq : formboost4 ] @xmath284 + since the transformation @xmath285 is the inverse of @xmath286 , the function @xmath287 obeys @xmath288 hence @xmath289 is a bijection of the open interval @xmath290 onto itself and obeys @xmath291 3 . next we determine @xmath289 . once more using ( [ eq : equivboostsrot ] ) , where @xmath264 is a @xmath272-rotation about the @xmath273-axis , shows that the functions @xmath292 and @xmath293 in ( [ eq : formboost1 ] ) are even and the functions @xmath294 and @xmath245 are odd . the definition ( [ eq : formboost4b ] ) of @xmath289 then implies that @xmath289 is odd . since we assumed @xmath257 to be a continuous coordinatisation of a topological group , the map @xmath289 must also be continuous ( since the inversion map , @xmath295 , is continuous in a topological group ) . a standard theorem now states that a continuous bijection of an interval of @xmath296 onto itself must be strictly monotonic . together with ( [ eq : formboost6 ] ) this implies that @xmath289 is either the identity or minus the identity map . to save notation , so that ( [ eq : formboost6 ] ) now reads @xmath297 . first assume that @xmath289 is strictly monotonically increasing , then @xmath298 implies @xmath299 , a contradiction , and @xmath300 implies @xmath301 , likewise a contradiction . hence @xmath302 in this case . next assume @xmath289 is strictly monotonically decreasing . then @xmath303 is a strictly monotonically increasing map of the interval @xmath290 to itself that obeys ( [ eq : formboost6 ] ) . hence , as just seen , @xmath304 , i.e. @xmath305 . ] if it is the identity map , evaluation of ( [ eq : formboost5 ] ) shows that either the determinant of @xmath269 must equals @xmath306 , or that @xmath269 is the identity for all @xmath257 . we exclude the second possibility straightaway and the first one on the grounds that we required @xmath269 be the identity for @xmath307 . also , in that case , ( [ eq : formboost5 ] ) implies @xmath308 for all @xmath309 . we conclude that @xmath305 , which implies that the relative velocity of @xmath280 with respect to @xmath282 is minus the relative velocity of @xmath282 with respect to @xmath280 . plausible as it might seem , there is no a priori reason why this should be so . and @xmath283 are measured with different sets of rods and clocks . ] . on the face of it , the rp only implies ( [ eq : formboost6 ] ) , not the stronger relation @xmath310 . this was first pointed out in @xcite . 4 . we briefly revisit ( [ eq : formboosts2 ] ) . since we have seen that @xmath311 is the inverse of @xmath312 , we must have @xmath313 , so that ( [ eq : formboosts2 ] ) implies @xmath314 . but only @xmath315 is compatible with our requirement that @xmath316 be the identity . now we return to the determination of @xmath269 . using ( [ eq : formboost4 ] ) and @xmath305 , we write @xmath317 and @xmath318\,.\ ] ] equation @xmath319 is now equivalent to + [ eq : formboost8 ] @xmath320 + since , as already seen , @xmath292 is an even and @xmath294 is an odd function , ( [ eq : formboost8 ] ) is equivalent to @xmath321 , i.e. the unimodularity of @xmath253 . equation ( [ eq : formboost7 ] ) then allows to express @xmath294 in terms of @xmath292 : @xmath322\,.\ ] ] 6 . our problem is now reduced to the determination of the single function @xmath292 . this we achieve by employing the requirement that the composition of two boosts in the same direction results again in a boost in that direction , i.e. @xmath323 according to ( [ eq : formboost6b ] ) each matrix @xmath269 has equal diagonal entries . applied to the product matrix on the left hand side of ( [ eq : formboost10 ] ) this implies that @xmath324 is independent of @xmath60 , i.e. equal to some constant @xmath325 whose physical dimension is that of an inverse velocity squared . hence we have @xmath326 where we have chosen the positive square root since we require @xmath327 . the other implications of ( [ eq : formboost10 ] ) are + [ eq : formboost12 ] @xmath328 + from which we deduce @xmath329 conversely , ( [ eq : formboost11 ] ) and ( [ eq : formboost13 ] ) imply ( [ eq : formboost12 ] ) . we conclude that ( [ eq : formboost10 ] ) is equivalent to ( [ eq : formboost11 ] ) and ( [ eq : formboost13 ] ) . so far a boost in @xmath262 direction has been shown to act non - trivially only in the @xmath277 plane , where its action is given by the matrix that results from inserting ( [ eq : formboost9 ] ) and ( [ eq : formboost11 ] ) into ( [ eq : formboost6b ] ) : @xmath330 * if @xmath331 we rescale @xmath332 and set @xmath333 . then ( [ eq : formboost14 ] ) is seen to be a euclidean rotation with angle @xmath239 in the @xmath334 plane . the velocity spectrum is the whole real line plus infinity , i.e. a circle , corresponding to @xmath335 $ ] , where @xmath336 and @xmath337 are identified . accordingly , the composition law ( [ eq : formboost13 ] ) is just ordinary addition for the angle @xmath239 . this causes several paradoxa when @xmath60 is interpreted as velocity . for example , composing two finite velocities @xmath338 which satisfy @xmath339 results in @xmath340 , and composing two finite and positive velocities , each of which is greater than @xmath341 , results in a finite but negative velocity . in this way the successive composition of finite positive velocities could also result in zero velocity . the group @xmath342 obtained in this fashion is , in fact , @xmath343 . this group may be uniquely characterised as the largest connected group of bijections of @xmath344 that preserves the euclidean distance measure . in particular , it treats time symmetrically with all space directions , so that no invariant notion of time - orientability can be given in this case . * for @xmath345 the transformations are just the ordinary boosts of the galilei group . the velocity spectrum is the whole real line ( i.e. @xmath60 is unbounded but finite ) and @xmath247 is the galilei group . the law for composing velocities is just ordinary vector addition . * finally , for @xmath346 , one infers from ( [ eq : formboost13 ] ) that @xmath347 is an upper bound for all velocities , in the sense that composing two velocities taken from the interval @xmath290 always results in a velocity from within that interval . writing @xmath348 , @xmath349 , and @xmath350 , the matrix ( [ eq : formboost14 ] ) is seen to be a _ lorentz boost _ or _ hyperbolic motion _ in the @xmath334 plane : @xmath351 the quantity @xmath352 is called _ _ rapidity__. if rewritten in terms of the corresponding rapidities the composition law ( [ eq : formboost13 ] ) reduces to ordinary addition : @xmath353 . this shows that only the galilei and the lorentz group survive as candidates for any symmetry group implementing the rp . once the lorentz group for velocity parameter @xmath245 is chosen , one may fully characterise it by its property to leave a certain symmetric bilinear form invariant . in this sense we geometric structure of minkowski space can be deduced . this closes the circle to where we started from in section[sec : frommetrictoaffine ] . in the previous sections we always understood an automorphisms of a structured set ( spacetime ) as a bijection . mathematically this seems an obvious requirement , but from a physical point of view this is less clear . the physical law of inertia provides us with distinguished motions _ locally _ in space and time . hence one may attempt to relax the condition for structure preserving maps , so as to only preserve inertial motions _ hence we ask the following question : what are the most general maps that _ locally _ map segments of straight lines to segments of straight lines ? this local approach has been pursued by @xcite . to answer this question completely , let us ( locally ) identify spacetime with @xmath179 where @xmath16 and assume the map to be @xmath354 , that is , three times continuously differentiable . so let @xmath355 be an open subset and determine all @xmath354 maps @xmath356 that map straight segments in @xmath357 into straight segments in @xmath179 . in coordinates we write @xmath358 and @xmath359 , so that @xmath360 . a straight segment in @xmath357 is a curve @xmath361 ( the open interval @xmath362 is usually taken to contain zero ) whose acceleration is pointwise proportional to its velocity . this is equivalent to saying that it can be parametrised so as to have zero acceleration , i.e. , @xmath363 for some @xmath364 . for the image path @xmath365 to be again straight its acceleration , @xmath366 , must be proportional to its velocity , @xmath367 , where the factor of proportionality , @xmath368 , depends on the point of the path and separately on @xmath292 . hence , in coordinates , we have @xmath369 for each @xmath294 this must be valid for all @xmath370 in a neighbourhood of zero in @xmath371 . taking the second derivatives with respect to @xmath292 , evaluation at @xmath372 , @xmath373 leads to [ eq : projmap2 ] @xmath374 where @xmath375 here we suppressed the remaining argument @xmath294 . equation ( [ eq : projmap2 ] ) is valid at each point in @xmath357 . integrability of ( [ eq : projmap2-a ] ) requires that its further differentiation is totally symmetric with respect to all lower indices ( here we use that the map @xmath9 is @xmath354 ) . this leads to @xmath376 inserting ( [ eq : projmap2-b ] ) one can show ( upon taking traces over @xmath377 and @xmath378 ) that the resulting equation is equivalent to @xmath379 in particular @xmath380 so that there is a local function @xmath381 ( if @xmath357 is simply connected , as we shall assume ) for which @xmath382 . equation ( [ eq : projmap4 ] ) is then equivalent to @xmath383 so that @xmath384 for some @xmath385 and @xmath386 . using @xmath387 and ( [ eq : projmap4 ] ) , equation ( [ eq : projmap2-a ] ) is equivalent to @xmath388=0 $ ] , which finally leads to the result that the most general solution for @xmath9 is given by @xmath389 here @xmath390 is a @xmath391 matrix , @xmath292 and @xmath140 vectors in @xmath179 , and @xmath386 . @xmath62 and @xmath140 must be such that @xmath357 does not intersect the hyperplane @xmath392 where @xmath9 becomes singular , but otherwise they are arbitrary . , i.e. iff @xmath394 , the transformations ( [ eq : projmap5 ] ) are not affine . in this case they are called proper projective . are there physical reasons to rule out such proper projective transformations ? a structural argument is that they do not leave any subset of @xmath179 invariant and that they hence can not be considered as automorphism group of any subdomain . a physical argument is that two separate points that move with the same velocity cease to do so if their worldlines are transformed by by a proper projective transformation . in particular , a rigid motion of an extended body ( undergoing inertial motion ) ceases to be rigid if so transformed ( cf.@xcite , p.16 ) . an illustrative example is the following : consider the one - parameter ( @xmath395 ) family of parallel lines @xmath396 ( where @xmath397 is the parameter along each line ) , and the proper projective map @xmath398 which becomes singular on the hyperplane @xmath399 . the one - parameter family of image lines @xmath400 have velocities @xmath401 whose directions are independent of @xmath397 , showing that they are indeed straight . however , the velocity directions now depend on @xmath395 , showing that they are not parallel anymore . let us , regardless of this , for the moment take seriously the transformations ( [ eq : projmap5 ] ) . one may reduce them to the following form of generalised boosts , discarding translations and rotations and using equivariance with respect to the latter ( we restrict to four spacetime dimensions from now on ) : [ eq : focklorentztrans1 ] @xmath402 where @xmath403 represents the boost velocity , @xmath404 its modulus , and all functions of @xmath60 are even . the subscripts @xmath405 and @xmath406 refer to the components parallel and perpendicular to @xmath257 . now one imposes the following conditions which allow to determine the eight functions @xmath407 , of which only seven are considered independent since common factors of the numerator and denominator cancel ( we essentially follow @xcite ) : 1 . the origin @xmath408 has velocity @xmath257 in the unprimed coordinates , leading to @xmath409 and thereby eliminating @xmath410 as independent function . the origin @xmath411 has velocity @xmath412 in the primed coordinates , leading to @xmath413 and thereby eliminating @xmath293 as independent function . reciprocity : the transformation parametrised by @xmath412 is the inverse of that parametrised by @xmath257 , leading to relations @xmath414 , @xmath415 , and @xmath416 , thereby eliminating @xmath417 as independent functions . of the remaining three functions @xmath418 an overall factor in the numerator and denominator can be split off so that two free functions remain . transitivity : the composition of two transformations of the type ( [ eq : focklorentztrans1 ] ) with parameters @xmath257 and @xmath419 must be again of this form with some parameter @xmath420 , which turns out to be the same function of the velocities @xmath257 and @xmath419 as in special relativity ( einstein s addition law ) , for reasons to become clear soon . this allows to determine the last two functions in terms of two constants @xmath245 and @xmath421 whose physical dimensions are that of a velocity and of a length respectively . writing , as usual , @xmath422 the final form is given by [ eq : focklorentztrans2 ] @xmath423 in the limit as @xmath424 this approaches an ordinary lorentz boost : @xmath425 moreover , for finite @xmath421 the map ( [ eq : focklorentztrans2 ] ) is conjugate to ( [ eq : lorentzfock3 ] ) with respect to a time dependent deformation . to see this , observe that the common denominator in ( [ eq : focklorentztrans2 ] ) is just @xmath426 , whereas the numerators correspond to ( [ eq : lorentzfock3 ] ) . hence , introducing the deformation map @xmath427 and denoting the map @xmath428 in ( [ eq : focklorentztrans2 ] ) by @xmath9 , we have @xmath429 note that @xmath112 is singular at the hyperplane @xmath430 and has no point of the hyperplane @xmath431 in its image . the latter hyperplane is the singularity set of @xmath432 . outside the hyperplanes @xmath433 the map @xmath112 relates the following time slabs in a diffeomorphic fashion : [ eq : difftimeslabs ] @xmath434 since boosts leave the upper - half spacetime , @xmath435 , invariant ( as set ) , ( [ eq : difftimeslabs - a ] ) shows that @xmath9 just squashes the linear action of boosts in @xmath436 into a non - linear action within @xmath437 , where @xmath421 now corresponds to an invariant scale . interestingly , this is the same deformation of boosts that have been recently considered in what is sometimes called _ doubly special relativity _ ( because there are now two , rather than just one , invariant scales , @xmath421 and @xmath245 ) , albeit there the deformation of boosts take place in momentum space where @xmath421 then corresponds to an invariant energy scale ; see @xcite and also @xcite . in this section we wish to discuss in more detail some of the non - trivial structures in minkowski . i have chosen them so as to emphasise the difference to the corresponding structures in galilean spacetime , and also because they do not seem to be much discussed in other standard sources . let us start right away by characterising those vectors for which we have an inverted cauchy - schwarz inequality : [ lemma : stricticsi ] let @xmath19 be of dimension @xmath438 and @xmath45 be some non - zero vector . the strict inverted cauchy - schwarz inequality , @xmath439 holds for all @xmath106 linearly independent of @xmath60 iff @xmath60 is timelike . obviously @xmath60 can not be spacelike , for then we would violate ( [ eq : strictinvcsi ] ) with any spacelike @xmath77 . if @xmath60 is lightlike then @xmath77 violates ( [ eq : strictinvcsi ] ) iff it is in the set @xmath440 , which is non - empty iff @xmath438 . hence @xmath60 can not be lightlike if @xmath438 . if @xmath60 is timelike we decompose @xmath441 with @xmath442 so that @xmath443 , with equality iff @xmath60 and @xmath77 are linearly dependent . hence @xmath444 with equality iff @xmath60 and @xmath77 are linearly dependent . the next lemma deals with the intersection of a causal line with a light cone , a situation depicted in fig.[fig : robb ] . [ lemma : intlinecone ] let @xmath445 be the light - doublecone with vertex @xmath62 and @xmath446 be a non - spacelike line , i.e. @xmath447 , through @xmath448 . if @xmath60 is timelike @xmath449 consists of two points . if @xmath60 is lightlike this intersection consists of one point if @xmath450 and is empty if @xmath451 . note that the latter two statements are independent of the choice of @xmath452as they must be , i.e. are invariant under @xmath453 , where @xmath454 . we have @xmath455 iff @xmath456 for @xmath60 timelike we have @xmath457 and ( [ eq : lemmaintlinecone1 ] ) has two solutions @xmath458 indeed , since @xmath448 , the vectors @xmath60 and @xmath459 can not be linearly dependent so that lemma[lemma : stricticsi ] implies the positivity of the expression under the square root . if @xmath60 is lightlike ( [ eq : lemmaintlinecone1 ] ) becomes a linear equation which is has one solution if @xmath460 and no solution if @xmath461 [ note that @xmath462 since @xmath463 by hypothesis ] . ( -12,155)@xmath464 ( -22,114)@xmath140 ( -35,56)@xmath465 ( -72,98)@xmath62 ( -60,0)@xmath466 ( -42,15)@xmath60 ( -75,146)@xmath467 ( -75,62)@xmath468 ( -13,195)@xmath469 [ prop : einsteinsynch ] let @xmath469 and @xmath445 as in lemma[lemma : intlinecone ] with @xmath60 timelike . let @xmath464 and @xmath465 be the two intersection points of @xmath469 with @xmath445 and @xmath470 a point between them . then @xmath471 moreover , @xmath472 iff @xmath71 is perpendicular to @xmath60 . the vectors @xmath473 and @xmath474 are lightlike , which gives ( note that @xmath475 is spacelike ) : [ eq : prop : einsteinsynch23 ] @xmath476 since @xmath477 and @xmath478 are parallel we have @xmath479 with @xmath480 so that @xmath481 and @xmath482 . now , multiplying ( [ eq : prop : einsteinsynch3 ] ) with @xmath155 and adding this to ( [ eq : prop : einsteinsynch2 ] ) immediately yields @xmath483 since @xmath484 this implies ( [ eq : prop : einsteinsynch1 ] ) . finally , since @xmath477 and @xmath485 are antiparallel , @xmath486 iff @xmath487 . equations ( [ eq : prop : einsteinsynch23 ] ) now show that this is the case iff @xmath488 , i.e. iff @xmath489 . hence we have shown @xmath490 in other words , @xmath140 is the midpoint of the segment @xmath491 iff the line through @xmath62 and @xmath140 is perpendicular ( wrt . @xmath30 ) to @xmath469 . the somewhat surprising feature of the first statement of this proposition is that ( [ eq : prop : einsteinsynch1 ] ) holds for _ any _ point of the segment @xmath491 , not just the midpoint , as it would have to be the case for the corresponding statement in euclidean geometry . the second statement of proposition[prop : einsteinsynch ] gives a convenient geometric characterisation of einstein - simultaneity . recall that an event @xmath140 on a timelike line @xmath469 ( representing an inertial observer ) is defined to be einstein - simultaneous with an event @xmath62 in spacetime iff @xmath140 bisects the segment @xmath491 between the intersection points @xmath492 of @xmath469 with the double - lightcone at @xmath62 . hence proposition[prop : einsteinsynch ] implies [ corol : einsteinsim ] einstein simultaneity with respect to a timelike line @xmath469 is an equivalence relation on spacetime , the equivalence classes of which are the spacelike hyperplanes orthogonal ( wrt . @xmath30 ) to @xmath469 . the first statement simply follows from the fact that the family of parallel hyperplanes orthogonal to @xmath469 form a partition ( cf . sect.[sec : groupactions ] ) of spacetime . from now on we shall use the terms ` timelike line ' and ` inertial observer ' synonymously . note that einstein simultaneity is only defined relative to an inertial observer . given two inertial observers , [ eq : twoobservers ] @xmath493 we call the corresponding einstein - simultaneity relations _ @xmath469-simultaneity _ and _ @xmath494-simultaneity_. obviously they coincide iff @xmath469 and @xmath494 are parallel ( @xmath60 and @xmath283 are linearly dependent ) . in this case @xmath495 is @xmath469-simultaneous to @xmath470 iff @xmath470 is @xmath494-simultaneous to @xmath495 . if @xmath469 and @xmath494are not parallel ( skew or intersecting in one point ) it is generally not true that if @xmath495 is @xmath469-simultaneous to @xmath470 then @xmath470 is also @xmath494-simultaneous to @xmath495 . in fact , we have [ prop : skewsim ] let @xmath469 and @xmath494 two non - parallel timelike likes . there exists a unique pair @xmath496 so that @xmath497 is @xmath469-simultaneous to @xmath140 and @xmath140 is @xmath494 simultaneous to @xmath497 . we parameterise @xmath469 and @xmath494 as in ( [ eq : twoobservers ] ) . the two conditions for @xmath497 being @xmath469-simultaneous to @xmath140 and @xmath140 being @xmath494-simultaneous to @xmath497 are @xmath498 . writing @xmath499 and @xmath500 this takes the form of the following matrix equation for the two unknowns @xmath155 and @xmath501 : @xmath502 this has a unique solution pair @xmath503 , since for linearly independent timelike vectors @xmath60 and @xmath283 lemma[lemma : stricticsi ] implies @xmath504 . note that if @xmath469 and @xmath494 intersect @xmath505 . clearly , einstein - simultaneity is conventional and physics proper should not depend on it . for example , the fringe - shift in the michelson - morley experiment is independent of how we choose to synchronise clocks . in fact , it does not even make use of any clock . so what is the general definition of a ` simultaneity structure ' ? it seems obvious that it should be a relation on spacetime that is at least symmetric ( each event should be simultaneous to itself ) . going from one - way simultaneity to the mutual synchronisation of two clocks , one might like to also require reflexivity ( if @xmath62 is simultaneous to @xmath140 then @xmath140 is simultaneous to @xmath62 ) , though this is not strictly required in order to one - way synchronise each clock in a set of clocks with one preferred ` master clock ' , which is sufficient for many applications . moreover , if we like to speak of the mutual simultaneity of sets of more than two events we need an equivalence relation on spacetime . the equivalence relation should be such that each inertial observer intersect each equivalence class precisely once . let us call such a simultaneity structure ` admissible ' . clearly there are zillions of such structures : just partition spacetime into any set of appropriate spacelike hypersurfaces ( there are more possibilities at this point , like families of forward or backward lightcones ) . an _ absolute _ admissible simultaneity structure would be one which is invariant ( cf . sect.[sec : groupactions ] ) under the automorphism group of spacetime . we have [ prop : abssim ] there exits precisely one admissible simultaneity structure which is invariant under the inhomogeneous proper orthochronous galilei group and none that is invariant under the inhomogeneous proper orthochronous lorentz group . a proof is given in @xcite . there is a group - theoretic reason that highlights this existential difference : [ prop : abssimmath ] let @xmath249 be a group with transitive action on a set @xmath2 . let @xmath506 be the stabiliser subgroup for @xmath507 ( due to transitivity all stabiliser subgroups are conjugate ) . then @xmath2 admits a @xmath249-invariant equivalence relation @xmath508 iff @xmath509 is _ not _ maximal , that is , iff @xmath509 is properly contained in a proper subgroup @xmath510 of @xmath249 : @xmath511 . a proof of this may be found in @xcite ( theorem1.12 ) . regarding the action of the inhomogeneous galilei and lorentz groups on spacetime , their stabilisers are the corresponding homogeneous groups . now , the homogeneous lorentz group is maximal in the inhomogeneous one , whereas the homogeneous galilei group is not maximal in the inhomogeneous one , since it can still be supplemented by time translations without the need to also invoke space translations . this , according to proposition[prop : abssimmath ] , is the group theoretic origin of the absence of any invariant simultaneity structure in the lorentzian case . however , one may ask whether there are simultaneity structures _ relative _ to some _ additional _ structure @xmath512 . as additional structure , @xmath512 , one could , for example , take an inertial reference frame , which is characterised by a foliation of spacetime by parallel timelike lines . the stabiliser subgroup of that structure within the proper orthochronous poincar group is given by the semidirect product of spacetime translations with all rotations in the hypersurfaces perpendicular to the lines in @xmath512 : @xmath513 here the @xmath514 only acts on the spatial translations , so that the group is also isomorphic to @xmath515 , where @xmath516 is the group of euclidean motions in 3-dimensions ( the hyperplanes perpendicular to the lines in @xmath512 ) . we can now ask : how many admissible @xmath517 invariant equivalence relations are there . the answer is [ prop : realsim ] there exits precisely one admissible simultaneity structure which is invariant under @xmath517 , where @xmath512 represents am inertial reference frame ( a foliation of spacetime by parallel timelike lines ) . it is given by einstein simultaneity , that is , the equivalence classes are the hyperplanes perpendicular to the lines in @xmath512 . the proof is given in @xcite . note again the connection to quoted group - theoretic result : the stabiliser subgroup of a point in @xmath517 is @xmath518 , which is clearly not maximal in @xmath517 since it is a proper subgroup of @xmath516 which , in turn , is a proper subgroup of @xmath517 . here we wish to briefly discuss another important structure associated with causality relations in minkowski space , which plays a fundamental rle in modern quantum field theory ( see e.g. @xcite ) . let @xmath519 and @xmath520 be subsets of @xmath63 . we say that @xmath519 and @xmath520 are _ causally disjoint _ or _ spacelike separated _ iff @xmath521 is spacelike , i.e. @xmath522 , for any @xmath523 and @xmath524 . note that because a point is not spacelike separated from itself , causally disjoint sets are necessarily disjoint in the ordinary set - theoretic sense the converse being of course not true . for any subset @xmath525 we denote by @xmath526 the largest subset of @xmath63 which is causally disjoint to @xmath2 . the set @xmath526 is called the _ causal complement _ of @xmath2 . the procedure of taking the causal complement can be iterated and we set @xmath527 etc . @xmath528 is called the _ causal completion _ of @xmath2 . it also follows straight from the definition that @xmath529 implies @xmath530 and also @xmath531 . if @xmath532 we call @xmath2 _ causally complete_. we note that the causal complement @xmath526 of any given @xmath2 is automatically causally complete . indeed , from @xmath531 we obtain @xmath533 , but the first inclusion applied to @xmath526 instead of @xmath2 leads to @xmath534 , showing @xmath535 . note also that for any subset @xmath2 its causal completion , @xmath528 , is the smallest causally complete subset containing @xmath2 , for if @xmath536 with @xmath537 , we derive from the first inclusion by taking @xmath538 that @xmath539 , so that the second inclusion yields @xmath540 . trivial examples of causally complete subsets of @xmath63 are the empty set , single points , and the total set @xmath63 . others are the open diamond - shaped regions ( [ eq : opendiamonds ] ) as well as their closed counterparts : @xmath541 we now focus attention to the set @xmath542 of causally complete subsets of @xmath63 , including the empty set , @xmath543 , and the total set , @xmath63 , which are mutually causally complementary . it is partially ordered by ordinary set - theoretic inclusion @xmath544 ( cf . sect.[sec : groupactions ] ) and carries the ` dashing operation ' @xmath545 of taking the causal complement . moreover , on @xmath542 we can define the operations of ` meet ' and ` join ' , denoted by @xmath546 and @xmath547 respectively , as follows : let @xmath548 where @xmath199 , then @xmath549 is the largest causally complete subset in the intersection @xmath550 and @xmath551 is the smallest causally complete set containing the union @xmath552 . the operations of @xmath546 and @xmath547 can be characterised in terms of the ordinary set - theoretic intersection @xmath553 together with the dashing - operation . to see this , consider two causally complete sets , @xmath554 where @xmath199 , and note that the set of points that are spacelike separated from @xmath519 and @xmath520 are obviously given by @xmath555 , but also by @xmath556 , so that [ eg : capcup ] @xmath557 here ( [ eq : capcup1 ] ) and ( [ eq : capcup2 ] ) are equivalent since any @xmath548 can be written as @xmath558 , namely @xmath559 . if @xmath554 runs through all sets in @xmath542 so does @xmath560 . hence any equation that holds generally for all @xmath548 remains valid if the @xmath554 are replaced by @xmath561 . equation ( [ eq : capcup2 ] ) immediately shows that @xmath550 is causally complete ( since it is the @xmath562 of something ) . taking the causal complement of ( [ eq : capcup1 ] ) we obtain the desired relation for @xmath563 . together we have [ eg : meetjoin ] @xmath564 from these we immediately derive [ eg : negating ] @xmath565 all what we have said so far for the set @xmath542 could be repeated verbatim for the set @xmath566 of _ chronologically complete _ subsets . we say that @xmath519 and @xmath520 are _ chronologically disjoint _ or _ non - timelike separated _ , iff @xmath567 and @xmath568 for any @xmath523 and @xmath524 . @xmath526 , the _ chronological complement _ of @xmath2 , is now the largest subset of @xmath63 which is chronologically disjoint to @xmath2 . the only difference between the causal and the chronological complement of @xmath2 is that the latter now contains lightlike separated points outside @xmath2 . a set @xmath2 is _ chronologically complete _ iff @xmath569 , where the dashing now denotes the operation of taking the chronological complement . again , for any set @xmath2 the set @xmath526 is automatically chronologically complete and @xmath528 is the smallest chronologically complete subset containing @xmath2 . single points are chronologically complete subsets . all the formal properties regarding @xmath570 , @xmath546 , and @xmath547 stated hitherto for @xmath542 are the same for @xmath566 . one major difference between @xmath542 and @xmath566 is that the types of diamond - shaped sets they contain are different . for example , the closed ones , ( [ eq : closeddiamonds ] ) , are members of both . the open ones , ( [ eq : opendiamonds ] ) , are contained in @xmath542 but _ not _ in @xmath566 . instead , @xmath566 contains the closed diamonds whose ` equator'sphere in which the forward and backward light - cones in ( [ eq : closeddiamonds ] ) intersect . in the two - dimensional drawings the ` equator ' is represented by just two points marking the right and left corners of the diamond - shaped set . ] have been removed . an essential structural difference between @xmath542 and @xmath566 will be stated below , after we have introduced the notion of a lattice to which we now turn . to put all these formal properties into the right frame we recall the definition of a lattice . let @xmath571 be a partially ordered set and @xmath572 any two elements in @xmath573 . synonymously with @xmath574 we also write @xmath575 and say that @xmath292 is smaller than @xmath294 , @xmath294 is bigger than @xmath292 , or @xmath294 majorises @xmath292 . we also write @xmath576 if @xmath574 and @xmath232 . if , with respect to @xmath141 , their greatest lower and least upper bound exist , they are denoted by @xmath577called the ` meet of @xmath292 and @xmath294'and @xmath578called the ` join of @xmath292 and @xmath294'respectively . a partially ordered set for which the greatest lower and least upper bound exist for any pair @xmath572 of elements from @xmath573 is called a _ lattice_. we now list some of the most relevant additional structural elements lattices can have : a lattice is called _ complete _ if greatest lower and least upper bound exist for any subset @xmath579 . if @xmath580 they are called @xmath336 ( the smallest element in the lattice ) and @xmath121 ( the biggest element in the lattice ) respectively . an _ atom _ in a lattice is an element @xmath292 which majorises only @xmath336 , i.e. @xmath581 and if @xmath582 then @xmath583 or @xmath584 . the lattice is called _ atomic _ if each of its elements different from @xmath336 majorises an atom . an atomic lattice is called _ atomistic _ if every element is the join of the atoms it majorises . an element @xmath245 is said to _ cover _ @xmath292 if @xmath585 and if @xmath586 either @xmath587 or @xmath588 . an atomic lattice is said to have the _ covering property _ if , for every element @xmath294 and every atom @xmath292 for which @xmath589 , the join @xmath578 covers @xmath294 . the subset @xmath590 is called a _ distributive triple _ if [ eq : disttriple ] @xmath591 a lattice is called _ distributive _ or _ boolean _ if every triple @xmath592 is distributive . it is called _ modular _ if every triple @xmath592 with @xmath574 is distributive . it is straightforward to check from ( [ eq : disttriple ] ) that modularity is equivalent to the following single condition : @xmath593 if in a lattice with smallest element @xmath336 and greatest element @xmath121 a map @xmath594 , @xmath595 , exist such that [ eq : orthocomplement ] @xmath596 the lattice is called _ orthocomplemented_. it follows that whenever the meet and join of a subset @xmath597 ( @xmath598 is some index set ) exist one has demorgan s laws ) is redundant , as each of its two statements follows from the other , due to @xmath599 . ] : [ eq : gendemorgan ] @xmath600 for orthocomplemented lattices there is a still weaker version of distributivity than modularity , which turns out to be physically relevant in various contexts : [ def : orthomodular ] an orthocomplemented lattice is called _ orthomodular _ if every triple @xmath592 with @xmath574 and @xmath601 is distributive . from ( [ eq : modularity ] ) and using that @xmath602 for @xmath603 one sees that this is equivalent to the single condition ( renaming @xmath245 to @xmath604 ) : [ eq : orthomodularity ] @xmath605 where the second line follows from the first by taking its orthocomplement and renaming @xmath606 to @xmath607 . it turns out that these conditions can still be simplified by making them independent of @xmath245 . in fact , ( [ eq : orthomodularity ] ) are equivalent to [ eq : altorthomodularity ] @xmath608 it is obvious that ( [ eq : orthomodularity ] ) implies ( [ eq : altorthomodularity ] ) ( set @xmath609 ) . but the converse is also true . to see this , take e.g. ( [ eq : altorthomodularity2 ] ) and choose any @xmath610 . then @xmath611 , @xmath612 ( by hypothesis ) , and @xmath613 ( trivially ) , so that @xmath614 . hence @xmath615 , which proves ( [ eq : orthomodularity2 ] ) . complete orthomodular atomic lattices are automatically atomistic . indeed , let @xmath294 be the join of all atoms majorised by @xmath616 . assume @xmath232 so that necessarily @xmath617 , then ( [ eq : altorthomodularity2 ] ) implies @xmath618 . then there exists an atom @xmath245 majorised by @xmath619 . this implies @xmath620 and @xmath601 , hence also @xmath621 . but this is a contradiction , since @xmath294 is by definition the join of all atoms majorised by @xmath292 . finally we mention the notion of _ compatibility _ or _ commutativity _ , which is a symmetric , reflexive , but generally not transitive relation @xmath421 on an orthomodular lattice ( cf . sec.[sec : groupactions ] ) . we write @xmath622 for @xmath623 and define : [ eq : defcompatibility ] @xmath624 the equivalence of these two lines , which shows that the relation of being compatible is indeed symmetric , can be demonstrated using orthomodularity as follows : suppose ( [ eq : defcompatibility1 ] ) holds ; then @xmath625 , where we used the orthocomplement of ( [ eq : defcompatibility1 ] ) to replace @xmath626 in the first expression and the trivial identity @xmath627 in the second step . now , applying ( [ eq : altorthomodularity2 ] ) to @xmath628 we get @xmath629=(b\wedge a)\vee ( b\wedge a')$ ] , i.e. ( [ eq : defcompatibility2 ] ) . the converse , @xmath630 , is of course entirely analogous . from ( [ eq : defcompatibility ] ) a few things are immediate : @xmath622 is equivalent to @xmath631 , @xmath622 is implied by @xmath574 or @xmath632 , and the elements @xmath336 and @xmath121 are compatible with all elements in the lattice . the _ centre _ of a lattice is the set of elements which are compatible with all elements in the lattice . in fact , the centre is a boolean sublattice . if the centre contains no other elements than @xmath336 and @xmath121 the lattice is said to be _ the other extreme is a boolean lattice , which is identical to its own centre . indeed , if @xmath633 is a distributive triple , one has @xmath634 . after these digression into elementary notions of lattice theory we come back to our examples of the sets @xmath542 @xmath566 . our statements above amount to saying that they are complete , atomic , and orthocomplemented lattices . the partial order relation @xmath141 is given by @xmath635 and the extreme elements @xmath336 and @xmath121 correspond to the empty set @xmath543 and the total set @xmath63 , the points of which are the atoms . neither the covering property nor modularity is shared by any of the two lattices , as can be checked by way of elementary counterexamples . and @xmath140 . then @xmath636 whereas @xmath637 is given by the closed diamond ( [ eq : closeddiamonds ] ) . note that this is true in @xmath542 _ and _ @xmath566 . but , clearly , @xmath637 does not cover either @xmath638 or @xmath639 . ] in particular , neither of them is boolean . however , in @xcite it was shown that @xmath566 is orthomodular ; see also @xcite which deals with more general spacetimes . note that by the argument given above this implies that @xmath566 is atomistic . in contrast , @xmath542 is definitely _ not _ orthomodular , as is e.g. seen by the counterexample given in fig.[fig : countex ] . regarding this point , there are some conflicting statements in the literature . the first edition of @xcite states orthomodularity of @xmath566 in proposition4.1.3 , which is removed in the second edition without further comment . the proof offered in the first edition uses ( [ eq : altorthomodularity1 ] ) as definition of orthomodularity , writing @xmath640 for @xmath292 and @xmath641 for b. the crucial step is the claim that any spacetime event in the set @xmath642 lies in @xmath641 and that any causal line through it must intersect either @xmath640 or @xmath643 . the last statement is , however , not correct since the join of two sets ( here @xmath640 and @xmath643 ) is generally larger than the domain of dependence of their ordinary set - theoretic union ; compare fig.[fig : countex ] . : ( generally , the domain of dependence of a subset @xmath2 of spacetime @xmath1 is the largest subset @xmath644 such that any inextensible causal curve that intersects @xmath645 also intersects @xmath2 . ) ] it is also not difficult to prove that @xmath566 is irreducible . , the failure of irreducibility of @xmath646 is directly related to the existence of closed timelike curves ; see @xcite . ] ( -365,104)@xmath469 ( -344.5,72)@xmath292 ( -280,50)@xmath647 ( -322,85)@xmath648 ( -152,85)@xmath648 ( -180,50)@xmath294 ( -30,50)@xmath294 ( -105,50)@xmath647 ( -158,54)@xmath292 it is well known that the lattices of propositions for classical systems are boolean , whereas those for quantum systems are merely orthomodular . in classical physics the elements of the lattice are measurable subsets of phase space , with @xmath141 being ordinary set - theoretic inclusion @xmath635 , and @xmath546 and @xmath547 being ordinary set - theoretic intersection @xmath553 and union @xmath649 respectively . the orthocomplement is the ordinary set - theoretic complement . in quantum mechanics the elements of the lattice are the closed subspaces of hilbert space , with @xmath141 being again ordinary inclusion , @xmath546 ordinary intersection , and @xmath547 is given by @xmath650 . the orthocomplement of a closed subset is the orthogonal complement in hilbert space . for comprehensive discussions see @xcite and @xcite . one of the main questions in the foundations of quantum mechanics is whether one could understand ( derive ) the usage of hilbert spaces and complex numbers from somehow more fundamental principles . even though it is not a priori clear what ones measure of fundamentality should be at this point , an interesting line of attack consists in deriving the mentioned structures from the properties of the lattice of propositions ( quantum logic ) . it can be shown that a lattice that is complete , atomic , irreducible , orthomodular , and that satisfies the covering property is isomorphic to the lattice of closed subspaces of a linear space with hermitean inner product . the complex numbers are selected if additional technical assumptions are added . for the precise statements of these reconstruction theorems see @xcite . it is now interesting to note that , on a formal level , there is a similar transition in going from galilei invariant to lorentz invariant causality relations . in fact , in galilean spacetime one can also define a chronological complement : two points are chronologically related if they are connected by a worldline of finite speed and , accordingly , two subsets in spacetime are chronologically disjoint if no point in one set is chronologically related to a point of the other . for example , the chronological complement of a point @xmath62 are all points simultaneous to , but different from , @xmath62 . more general , it is not hard to see that the chronologically complete sets are just the subsets of some @xmath651 hypersurface . the lattice of chronologically complete sets is then the continuous disjoint union of sublattices , each of which is isomorphic to the boolean lattice of subsets in @xmath256 . for details see @xcite . as we have seen above , @xmath652 is complete , atomic , irreducible , and orthomodular ( hence atomistic ) . the main difference to the lattice of propositions in quantum mechanics , as regards the formal aspects discussed here , is that @xmath652 does _ not _ satisfy the covering property . otherwise the formal similarities are intriguing and it is tempting to ask whether there is a deeper meaning to this . in this respect it would be interesting to know whether one could give a lattice - theoretic characterisation for @xmath653 ( @xmath1 some fixed spacetime ) , comparable to the characterisation of the lattices of closed subspaces in hilbert space alluded to above . even for @xmath654 such a characterisation seems , as far as i am aware , not to be known . as is well known , the notion of a rigid body , which proves so useful in newtonian mechanics , is incompatible with the existence of a universal finite upper bound for all signal velocities @xcite . as a result , the notion of a perfectly rigid body does not exist within the framework of sr . however , the notion of a _ rigid motion _ does exist . intuitively speaking , a body moves rigidly if , locally , the relative spatial distances of its material constituents are unchanging . the motion of an extended body is described by a normalised timelike vector field @xmath655 , where @xmath214 is an open subset of minkowski space , consisting of the events where the material body in question ` exists ' . we write @xmath656 for the minkowskian scalar product . being normalised now means that @xmath657 ( we do _ not _ choose units such that @xmath658 ) . the lie derivative with respect to @xmath76 is denoted by @xmath659 . for each material part of the body in motion its local rest space at the event @xmath660 can be identified with the hyperplane through @xmath62 orthogonal to @xmath661 : @xmath662 @xmath663 carries a euclidean inner product , @xmath664 , given by the restriction of @xmath665 to @xmath663 . generally we can write @xmath666 where @xmath667 is the one - form associated to @xmath76 . following @xcite the precise definition of ` rigid motion ' can now be given as follows : [ def : rigidmotion ] let @xmath76 be a normalised timelike vector field @xmath76 . the motion described by its flow is _ rigid _ if @xmath668 note that , in contrast to the killing equations @xmath669 , these equations are non linear due to the dependence of @xmath216 upon @xmath76 . we write @xmath670 for the tensor field over spacetime that pointwise projects vectors perpendicular to @xmath76 . it acts on one forms @xmath239 via @xmath671 and accordingly on all tensors . the so extended projection map will still be denoted by @xmath672 . then we e.g. have @xmath673 it is not difficult to derive the following two equations : equation ( [ eq : rigmo2 ] ) simply follows from @xmath674 , so that @xmath675 for all @xmath676 . in fact , @xmath677 , where @xmath678 is the spacetime - acceleration . this follows from @xmath679)= g(a , x)-g(u,\nabla_xu)=g(a , x)$ ] , where @xmath680 was used in the last step . ] @xmath681 where @xmath9 is any differentiable real - valued function on @xmath214 . equation ( [ eq : rigmo1 ] ) shows that the normalised vector field @xmath76 satisfies ( [ eq : def : rigmo ] ) iff any rescaling @xmath682 with a nowhere vanishing function @xmath9 does . hence the normalization condition for @xmath76 in ( [ eq : def : rigmo ] ) is really irrelevant . it is the geometry in spacetime of the flow lines and not their parameterisation which decide on whether motions ( all , i.e. for any parameterisation , or none ) along them are rigid . this has be the case because , generally speaking , there is no distinguished family of sections ( hypersurfaces ) across the bundle of flow lines that would represent ` the body in space ' , i.e. mutually simultaneous locations of the body s points . distinguished cases are those exceptional ones in which @xmath76 is hypersurface orthogonal . then the intersection of @xmath76 s flow lines with the orthogonal hypersurfaces consist of mutually _ einstein synchronous _ locations of the points of the body . an example is discussed below . equation ( [ eq : rigmo2 ] ) shows that the rigidity condition is equivalent to the ` spatially ' projected killing equation . we call the flow of the timelike normalised vector field @xmath76 a _ killing motion _ ( i.e. a spacetime isometry ) if there is a killing field @xmath280 such that @xmath683 . equation ( [ eq : rigmo2 ] ) immediately implies that killing motions are rigid . what about the converse ? are there rigid motions that are not killing ? this turns out to be a difficult question . its answer in minkowski space is : ` yes , many , but not as many as navely expected . ' before we explain this , let us give an illustrative example for a killing motion , namely that generated by the boost killing - field in minkowski space . we suppress all but one spatial directions and consider boosts in @xmath262 direction in two - dimensional minkowski space ( coordinates @xmath684 and @xmath262 ; metric @xmath685 ) . the killing field is denote the vector fields naturally defined by the coordinates @xmath686 . pointwise the dual basis to @xmath687 is @xmath688 . ] @xmath689 which is timelike in the region @xmath690 . we focus on the ` right wedge ' @xmath691 , which is now our region @xmath214 . consider a rod of length @xmath469 which at @xmath692 is represented by the interval @xmath693 , where @xmath694 . the flow of the normalised field @xmath683 is [ eq : boostkill2 ] @xmath695 where @xmath696 labels the elements of the rod at @xmath697 . we have @xmath698 , showing that the individual elements of the rod move on hyperbolae ( ` hyperbolic motion ' ) . @xmath699 is the proper time along each orbit , normalised so that the rod lies on the @xmath262 axis at @xmath697 . the combination @xmath700 is just the flow parameter for @xmath280 ( [ eq : boostkill1 ] ) , sometimes referred to as ` killing time ' ( though it is dimensionless ) . from ( [ eq : boostkill2 ] ) we can solve for @xmath155 and @xmath699 as functions of @xmath684 and @xmath262 : [ eq : lambdatau ] @xmath701 from which we infer that the hypersurfaces of constant @xmath155 are hyperplanes which all intersect at the origin . moreover , we also have @xmath702 ( @xmath293 is just the ordinary exterior differential ) so that the hyperplanes of constant @xmath155 intersect all orbits of @xmath76 ( and @xmath280 ) orthogonally . hence the hyperplanes of constant @xmath155 qualify as the equivalence classes of mutually einstein - simultaneous events in the region @xmath703 for a family of observers moving along the killing orbits . this does not hold for the hypersurfaces of constant @xmath699 , which are curved . the modulus of the spacetime - acceleration ( which is the same as the modulus of the spatial acceleration measured in the local rest frame ) of the material part of the rod labelled by @xmath704 is @xmath705 as an aside we generally infer from this that , given a timelike curve of local acceleration ( modulus ) @xmath239 , infinitesimally nearby orthogonal hyperplanes intersect at a spatial distance @xmath706 . this remark will become relevant in the discussion of part2 of the noether - herglotz theorem given below . in order to accelerate the rod to the uniform velocity @xmath60 without deforming it , its material point labelled by @xmath704 has to accelerate for the eigentime ( this follows from ( [ eq : boostkill2 ] ) ) @xmath707 which depends on @xmath704 . in contrast , the killing time is the same for all material points and just given by the final rapidity . in particular , judged from the local observers moving with the rod , a rigid acceleration requires accelerating the rod s trailing end harder but shorter than pulling its leading end . in terms of the coordinates @xmath708 , which are co - moving with the flow of @xmath280 , and @xmath709 , which are co - moving with the flow of @xmath76 , we just have @xmath710 and @xmath711 respectively . the spacetime metric @xmath30 and the projected metric @xmath216 in terms of these coordinates are : [ eq : metricscomovcoord ] @xmath712 note the simple form @xmath30 takes in terms of @xmath704 and @xmath155 , which are also called the ` rindler coordinates ' for the region @xmath713 of minkowski space . they are the analogs in lorentzian geometry to polar coordinates ( radius @xmath704 , angle @xmath155 ) in euclidean geometry . let us now return to the general case . we decompose the derivative of the velocity one - form @xmath714 as follows : @xmath715 where @xmath716 and @xmath717 are the projected symmetrised and antisymmetrised derivatives respectively ) by @xmath547 and @xmath546 respectively and the symmetrised and antisymmetrised ( covariant- ) derivative by @xmath718 and @xmath719 . for example , @xmath720 and @xmath721 . note that @xmath722 is the same as the ordinary exterior differential @xmath723 . everything we say in the sequel applies to curved spacetimes if @xmath724 is read as covariant derivative with respect to the levi - civita connection . ] [ eq : thetaomega ] @xmath725 the symmetric part , @xmath716 , is usually further decomposed into its traceless and pure trace part , called the _ shear _ and _ expansion _ of @xmath76 respectively . the antisymmetric part @xmath717 is called the _ vorticity _ of @xmath76 . now recall that the lie derivative of @xmath30 is just twice the symmetrised derivative , which in our notation reads : @xmath726 this implies in view of ( [ eq : def : rigmo ] ) , ( [ eq : rigmo2 ] ) , and ( [ eq : thetaomega1 ] ) let @xmath76 be a normalised timelike vector field @xmath76 . the motion described by its flow is rigid iff @xmath76 is of vanishing shear and expansion , i.e. iff @xmath727 . vector fields generating rigid motions are now classified according to whether or not they have a vanishing vorticity @xmath717 : if @xmath728 the flow is called _ irrotational _ , otherwise _ rotational_. the following theorem is due to herglotz @xcite and noether @xcite : [ thm : noetherherglotz1 ] a rotational rigid motion in minkowski space must be a killing motion . an example of such a rotational motion is given by the killing field we now use standard cylindrical coordinates @xmath729 , in terms of which @xmath730 . ] @xmath731 inside the region @xmath732 where @xmath280 is timelike . this motion corresponds to a rigid rotation with constant angular velocity @xmath733 which , without loss of generality , we take to be positive . using the co - moving angular coordinate @xmath734 , the split ( [ eq : hormetric ] ) is now furnished by [ eq : rotsplitmetric ] @xmath735 the metric @xmath216 is curved ( cf . lemma[lemma : noetherherglotz1 - 1 ] ) . but the rigidity condition ( [ eq : def : rigmo ] ) means that @xmath216 , and hence its curvature , can not change along the motion . therefore , even though we can keep a body in uniform rigid rotational motion , we can not put it into this state from rest by purely rigid motions , since this would imply a transition from a flat to a curved geometry of the body . this was first pointed out by ehrenfest @xcite . below we will give a concise analytical expression of this fact ( cf . equation ( [ eq : omegaliezero ] ) ) . all this is in contrast to the translational motion , as we will also see below . the proof of theorem[thm : noetherherglotz1 ] relies on arguments from differential geometry proper and is somewhat tricky . here we present the essential steps , basically following @xcite and @xcite in a slightly modernised notation . some straightforward calculational details will be skipped . the argument itself is best broken down into several lemmas . at the heart of the proof lies the following general construction : let @xmath1 be the spacetime manifold with metric @xmath30 and @xmath736 the open region in which the normalised vector field @xmath76 is defined . we take @xmath214 to be simply connected . the orbits of @xmath76 foliate @xmath214 and hence define an equivalence relation on @xmath214 given by @xmath184 iff @xmath62 and @xmath140 lie on the same orbit . the quotient space @xmath737 is itself a manifold . tensor fields on @xmath738 can be represented by ( i.e. are in bijective correspondence to ) tensor fields @xmath739 on @xmath214 which obey the two conditions : [ eq : projectibility ] @xmath740 tensor fields satisfying ( [ eq : projectibility1 ] ) are called _ horizontal _ , those satisfying both conditions ( [ eq : projectibility ] ) are called _ projectable_. the @xmath741-dimensional metric tensor @xmath216 , defined in ( [ eq : hormetric ] ) , is an example of a projectable tensor if @xmath76 generates a rigid motion , as assumed here . it turns @xmath742 into a @xmath741-dimensional riemannian manifold . the covariant derivative @xmath743 with respect to the levi - civita connection of @xmath216 is given by the following operation on projectable tensor fields : @xmath744 i.e. by first taking the covariant derivative @xmath724 ( levi - civita connection in @xmath745 ) in spacetime and then projecting the result horizontally . this results again in a projectable tensor , as a straightforward calculation shows . the horizontal projection of the spacetime curvature tensor can now be related to the curvature tensor of @xmath738 ( which is a projectable tensor field ) . without proof we state [ lemma : noetherherglotz1 - 1 ] let @xmath76 generate a rigid motion in spacetime . then the horizontal projection of the totally covariant ( i.e. all indices down ) curvature tensor @xmath421 of @xmath746 is related to the totally covariant curvature tensor @xmath747 of @xmath742 by the following equation appears with a minus sign on the right hand side of ( [ eq : projectedcurvaturerelation ] ) because the first index on the hatted curvature tensor is lowered with @xmath216 rather than @xmath30 . this induces a minus sign due to ( [ eq : hormetric ] ) , i.e. as a result of our ` mostly - minus'-convention for the signature of the spacetime metric . ] : @xmath748 where @xmath749 is the total antisymmetriser , which here projects tensors of rank four onto their totally antisymmetric part . formula ( [ eq : projectedcurvaturerelation ] ) is true in any spacetime dimension @xmath18 . note that the projector @xmath750 guarantees consistency with the first bianchi identities for @xmath421 and @xmath747 , which state that the total antisymmetrisation in their last three slots vanish identically . this is consistent with ( [ eq : projectedcurvaturerelation ] ) since for tensors of rank four with the symmetries of @xmath751 the total antisymmetrisation on tree slots is identical to @xmath749 , the symmetrisation on all four slots . the claim now simply follows from @xmath752 . we now restrict to spacetime dimensions of four or less , i.e. @xmath753 . in this case @xmath754 since @xmath672 makes the tensor effectively live over @xmath125 dimensions , and any totally antisymmetric four - tensor in three or less dimensions must vanish . applied to ( [ eq : projectedcurvaturerelation ] ) this means that @xmath755 , for horizontality of @xmath717 implies @xmath756 . hence the right hand side of ( [ eq : projectedcurvaturerelation ] ) just contains the pure tensor product @xmath757 . now , in our case @xmath758 since @xmath745 is flat minkowski space . this has two interesting consequences : first , @xmath742 is curved iff the motion is rotational , as exemplified above . second , since @xmath747 is projectable , its lie derivative with respect to @xmath76 vanishes . hence ( [ eq : projectedcurvaturerelation ] ) implies @xmath759 , which is equivalent to . ] @xmath760 this says that the vorticity can not change along a rigid motion in flat space . it is the precise expression for the remark above that you can not rigidly _ set _ a disk into rotation . note that it also provides the justification for the global classification of rigid motions into rotational and irrotational ones . a sharp and useful criterion for whether a rigid motion is killing or not is given by the following [ lemma : noetherherglotz1 - 2 ] let @xmath76 be a normalised timelike vector field on a region @xmath761 . the motion generated by @xmath76 is killing iff it is rigid and @xmath762 is exact on @xmath214 . that the motion generated by @xmath76 be killing is equivalent to the existence of a positive function @xmath763 such that @xmath764 , i.e. @xmath765 . in view of ( [ eq : thetaomega1 ] ) this is equivalent to @xmath766 which , in turn , is equivalent to @xmath727 and @xmath767 . this is true since @xmath716 is horizontal , @xmath768 , whereas the first term in ( [ eq : matteo1 ] ) vanishes upon applying @xmath672 . the result now follows from reading this equivalence both ways : 1 ) the killing condition for @xmath769 implies rigidity for @xmath76 and exactness of @xmath762 . 2 ) rigidity of @xmath76 and @xmath770 imply that @xmath769 is killing , where @xmath771 . we now return to the condition ( [ eq : omegaliezero ] ) and express @xmath772 in terms of @xmath723 . for this we recall that @xmath677 ( cf . footnote[foot : lievel ] ) and that lie derivatives on forms commute with exterior derivatives , where @xmath773 is the map of inserting @xmath76 in the first slot . ] . hence we have @xmath774 here we used the fact that the additional terms that result from the lie derivative of the projection tensor @xmath672 vanish , as a short calculation shows , and also that on forms the projection tensor @xmath672 can be written as @xmath775 , where @xmath773 denotes the map of insertion of @xmath76 in the first slot . now we prove [ lemma : noetherherglotz1 - 3 ] let @xmath76 generate a rigid motion in flat space such that @xmath776 , then @xmath777 equation ( [ eq : omegaliezero ] ) says that @xmath717 is projectable ( it is horizontal by definition ) . hence @xmath778 is projectable , which implies @xmath779 using ( [ eq : decveloneform ] ) with @xmath727 one has @xmath780 antisymmetrisation in the first two tensor slots makes the first term on the right vanish due to the flatness on @xmath724 . the antisymmetrised right hand side is hence equal to @xmath781 . taking the lie derivative of both sides makes the left hand side vanish due to ( [ eq : hatnablaomega1 ] ) , so that @xmath782 where we also used ( [ eq : omegaliezero ] ) . so we see that @xmath783 if @xmath776 . ) is generally not true if @xmath728 ; see equation ( [ eq : proof : noeterherglotz2i ] ) . ] the last three lemmas now constitute a proof for theorem[thm : noetherherglotz1 ] . indeed , using ( [ eq : lieacczero ] ) in ( [ eq : lieomega1 ] ) together with ( [ eq : omegaliezero ] ) shows @xmath784 , which , according to lemma[lemma : noetherherglotz1 - 2 ] , implies that the motion is killing . next we turn to the second part of the theorem of noether and herglotz , which reads as follows : [ thm : noetherherglotzp2 ] all irrotational rigid motions in minkowski space are given by the following construction : take a twice continuously differentiable curve @xmath785 in minkowski space , where w.l.o.g @xmath699 is the eigentime , so that @xmath786 . let @xmath787 be the hyperplane through @xmath788 intersecting the curve @xmath789 perpendicularly . let @xmath214 be a the tubular neighbourhood of @xmath789 in which no two hyperplanes @xmath790 intersect for any pair @xmath791 of points on the curve . in @xmath214 define @xmath76 as the unique ( once differentiable ) normalised timelike vector field perpendicular to all @xmath792 . the flow of @xmath76 is the sought - for rigid motion . we first show that the flow so defined is indeed rigid , even though this is more or less obvious from its very definition , since we just defined it by ` rigidly ' moving a hyperplane through spacetime . in any case , analytically we have , @xmath793 in @xmath214 any @xmath262 lies on exactly one such hyperplane , @xmath794 , which means that there is a function @xmath795 so that @xmath796 and hence @xmath797 . this implies @xmath798 . using the expression for @xmath9 from ( [ eq : proof : noeterherglotz2a ] ) this is equivalent to @xmath799\,,\ ] ] where ` @xmath800 ' denotes the ` identity vector - field ' , @xmath801 , in minkowski space . note that in @xmath214 we certainly have @xmath802 and hence @xmath803 . in @xmath214 we now define the normalised timelike vector field , @xmath804 . ] @xmath805 using ( [ eq : proof : noeterherglotz2b ] ) , its derivative is given by @xmath806/(n^2c^2)\,,\ ] ] where @xmath807 this immediately shows that @xmath808 ( since @xmath809 ) and therefore that @xmath810 . hence @xmath76 , as defined in ( [ eq : proof : noeterherglotz2c ] ) , generates an irrotational rigid motion . for the converse we need to prove that any irrotational rigid motion is obtained by such a construction . so suppose @xmath76 is a normalised timelike vector field such that @xmath810 . vanishing @xmath717 means @xmath811 . this is equivalent to @xmath812 , which according to the frobenius theorem in differential geometry is equivalent to the integrability of the distribution it denotes an assignment of a linear subspace @xmath813 in the tangent space @xmath814 to each point @xmath62 of @xmath1 . the distribution @xmath815 is defined by @xmath816 . a distribution is called ( locally ) integrable if ( in the neighbourhood of each point ) there is a submanifold @xmath817 of @xmath1 whose tangent space at any @xmath818 is just @xmath813 . ] @xmath815 , i.e. the hypersurface orthogonality of @xmath76 . we wish to show that the hypersurfaces orthogonal to @xmath76 are hyperplanes . to this end consider a spacelike curve @xmath819 , where @xmath397 is the proper length , running within one hypersurface perpendicular to @xmath76 . the component of its second @xmath397-derivative parallel to the hypersurface is given by ( to save notation we now simply write @xmath76 and @xmath820 instead of @xmath821 and @xmath822 ) @xmath823 where we made a partial differentiation in the second step and then used @xmath727 . geodesics in the hypersurface are curves whose second derivative with respect to proper length have vanishing components parallel to the hypersurface . now , ( [ eq : proof : noeterherglotz2f ] ) implies that geodesics in the hypersurface are geodesics in minkowski space ( the hypersurface is ` totally geodesic ' ) , i.e. given by straight lines . hence the hypersurfaces are hyperplanes . theorem[thm : noetherherglotzp2 ] precisely corresponds to the newtonian counterpart : the irrotational motion of a rigid body is determined by the worldline of any of its points , and any timelike worldline determines such a motion . we can rigidly put an extended body into any state of translational motion , as long as the size of the body is limited by @xmath706 , where @xmath239 is the modulus of its acceleration . this also shows that ( [ eq : lieacczero ] ) is generally not valid for irrotational rigid motions . in fact , the acceleration one - form field for ( [ eq : proof : noeterherglotz2c ] ) is @xmath824 from which one easily computes @xmath825 from this one sees , for example , that for _ constant acceleration _ , defined by @xmath826 ( constant acceleration in time as measured in the instantaneous rest frame ) , we have @xmath784 and hence a killing motion . clearly , this is just the motion ( [ eq : boostkill2 ] ) for the boost killing field ( [ eq : boostkill1 ] ) . the lie derivative of @xmath762 is now easily obtained : @xmath827 showing explicitly that it is not zero except for motions of constant acceleration , which were just seen to be killing motions . in contrast to the irrotational case just discussed , we have seen that we can not put a body rigidly into rotational motion . in the old days this was sometimes expressed by saying that the rigid body in sr has only three instead of six degrees of freedom . this was clearly thought to be paradoxical as long as one assumed that the notion of a perfectly rigid body should also make sense in the framework of sr . however , this hope was soon realized to be physically untenable @xcite . in this appendix we spell out in detail some of the mathematical notions that were used in the main text . given a set @xmath2 , recall that an _ equivalence relation _ is a subset @xmath508 such that for all @xmath828 the following conditions hold : 1 ) @xmath829 ( called ` reflexivity ' ) , 2 ) if @xmath830 then @xmath831 ( called ` symmetry ' ) , and 3 ) if @xmath830 and @xmath832 then @xmath833 ( called ` transitivity ' ) . once @xmath421 is given , one often conveniently writes @xmath184 instead of @xmath830 . given @xmath507 , its _ equivalence class _ , @xmath834\subseteq s$ ] , is given by all points @xmath421-related to @xmath62 , i.e. @xmath834:=\{q\in s\mid ( p , q)\in r\}$ ] . one easily shows that equivalence classes are either identical or disjoint . hence they form a _ partition _ of @xmath2 , that is , a covering by mutually disjoint subsets . conversely , given a partition of a set @xmath2 , it defines an equivalence relation by declaring two points as related iff they are members of the same cover set . hence there is a bijective correspondence between partitions of and equivalence relations on a set @xmath2 . the set of equivalence classes is denoted by @xmath835 or @xmath836 . there is a natural surjection @xmath837 , @xmath838 $ ] . if in the definition of equivalence relation we exchange symmetry for antisymmetry , i.e. @xmath830 and @xmath831 implies @xmath839 , the relation is called a _ partial order _ , usually written as @xmath131 for @xmath830 . if , instead , reflexivity is dropped and symmetry is replaced by asymmetry , i.e. @xmath830 implies @xmath840 , one obtains a relation called a _ strict partial order _ , usually denoted by @xmath841 for @xmath830 . an _ left action _ of a group @xmath249 on a set @xmath2 is a map @xmath842 , such that @xmath843 ( @xmath844 group identity ) and @xmath845 . if instead of the latter equation we have @xmath846 one speaks of a _ right action_. for left actions one sometimes conveniently writes @xmath847 , for right actions @xmath848 . an action is called _ transitive _ if for every pair @xmath849 there is a @xmath850 such that @xmath851 , and _ simply transitive _ if , in addition , @xmath852 determine @xmath30 uniquely , that is , @xmath853 for some @xmath397 implies @xmath854 . the action is called _ effective _ if @xmath855 for all @xmath397 implies @xmath856 ( ` every @xmath857 moves something ' ) and _ free _ if @xmath855 for some @xmath397 implies @xmath856 ( ` no @xmath857 has a fixed point ' ) . it is obvious that simple transitivity implies freeness and that , conversely , freeness and transitivity implies simple transitivity . moreover , for abelian groups , effectivity and transitivity suffice to imply simple transitivity . indeed , suppose @xmath858 holds for some @xmath859 , then we also have @xmath860 for all @xmath861 and hence @xmath862 by commutativity . this implies that @xmath858 holds , in fact , for all @xmath397 . for any @xmath859 we can consider the _ stabilizer subgroup _ @xmath863 if @xmath112 is transitive , any two stabilizer subgroups are conjugate : @xmath864 . by definition , if @xmath112 is free all stabilizer subgroups are trivial ( consist of the identity element only ) . in general , the intersection @xmath865 is the normal subgroup of elements acting trivially on @xmath2 . if @xmath112 is an action of @xmath249 on @xmath2 , then there is an effective action @xmath866 of @xmath867 on @xmath2 , defined by @xmath868,s):=\phi(g , s)$ ] , where @xmath869 $ ] denotes the @xmath870-coset of @xmath870 in @xmath249 . the _ orbit _ of @xmath397 in @xmath2 under the action @xmath112 of @xmath249 is the subset @xmath871 it is easy to see that group orbits are either disjoint or identical . hence they define a partition of @xmath2 , that is , an equivalence relation . a relation @xmath421 on @xmath2 is said to be invariant under the self map @xmath3 if @xmath872 . it is said to be invariant under the action @xmath112 of @xmath249 on @xmath2 if @xmath873 for all @xmath850 . if @xmath421 is such a @xmath249-invariant equivalence relation , there is an action @xmath874 of @xmath249 on the set @xmath835 of equivalence classes , defined by @xmath875):=[\phi(g , p)]$ ] . a general theorem states that invariant equivalence relations exist for transitive group actions , iff the stabilizer subgroups ( which in the transitive case are all conjugate ) are maximal ( e.g. theorem1.12 in @xcite ) . [ def : affinespace ] an @xmath18-dimensional * affine space * over the field @xmath876 ( usually @xmath296 or @xmath877 ) is a triple @xmath878 , where @xmath2 is a non - empty set , @xmath19 an @xmath18-dimensional vector space over @xmath876 , and @xmath879 an effective and transitive action @xmath880 of @xmath19 ( considered as abelian group with respect to addition of vectors ) on @xmath2 . we remark that an effective and transitive action of an abelian group is necessarily simply transitive . hence , without loss of generality , we could have required a simply transitive action in definition[def : affinespace ] straightaway . we also note that even though the action @xmath879 only refers to the abelian group structure of @xmath19 , it is nevertheless important for the definition of an affine space that @xmath19 is , in fact , a vector space ( see below ) . any ordered pair of points @xmath881 uniquely defines a vector @xmath60 , namely that for which @xmath882 . it can be thought of as the difference vector pointing from @xmath140 to @xmath62 . we write @xmath883 , where @xmath884 is a map which satisfies the conditions [ thm : altdefaffspace ] let @xmath2 be a non - empty set , @xmath19 an @xmath18-dimensional vector space over @xmath876 and @xmath884 a map satisfying conditions ( [ eq : affdiffmap ] ) . then @xmath2 is an @xmath18-dimensional affine space over @xmath876 with action @xmath886 . one usually writes @xmath887 , which defines what is meant by ` @xmath80 ' between an element of an affine space and an element of @xmath19 . note that addition of two points in affine space is not defined . the property of being an action now states @xmath888 and @xmath889 , so that in the latter case we may just write @xmath890 . similarly we write @xmath891 , defining what is meant by ` @xmath81 ' between two elements of affine space . the minus sign also makes sense between an element of affine space and an element of vector space if one defines @xmath892 . we may now write equations like @xmath893 the formal proof of which is again left to the reader . it implies that considered as abelian group , any linear subspace @xmath56 defines a subgroup . the orbit of that subgroup in @xmath2 through @xmath507 is an affine subspace , denoted by @xmath68 , i.e. @xmath894 which is an affine space over @xmath67 in its own right of dimension @xmath895 . one - dimensional affine subspaces are called _ ( straight ) lines _ , two - dimensional ones _ planes _ , and those of co - dimension one are called _ affine morphisms , or simply affine maps , are structure preserving maps between affine spaces . to define them in view of definition[def : affinespace ] we recall once more the significance of @xmath19 being a vector space and not just an abelian group . this enters the following definition in an essential way , since there are considerably more automorphisms of @xmath19 as abelian group , i.e. maps @xmath28 that satisfy @xmath896 for all @xmath32 , than automorphisms of @xmath19 as linear space which , in addition , need to satisfy @xmath897 for all @xmath45 and all @xmath898 ) . in fact , the difference is precisely that the latter are all continuous automorphisms of @xmath19 ( considered as topological abelian group ) , whereas there are plenty ( uncountably many ) discontinuous ones , see @xcite . , then it is easy to see that @xmath896 for all @xmath32 implies @xmath897 for all @xmath45 and all @xmath899 ( rational numbers ) . for continuous @xmath9 this implies the same for all @xmath900 . all discontinuous @xmath9 are obtained as follows : let @xmath901 be a ( necessarily uncountable ) basis of @xmath296 as vector space over @xmath902 ( ` hamel basis ' ) , prescribe any values @xmath903 , and extend @xmath9 linearly to all of @xmath296 . any value - prescription for which @xmath904 is not constant gives rise to a non @xmath296-linear and discontinuous @xmath9 . such @xmath9 are ` wildly ' discontinuous in the following sense : for _ any _ interval @xmath905 , @xmath906 is dense @xcite . ] in the convenient way of writing introduced above , this is equivalent to @xmath911 for all @xmath912 and all @xmath45 . ( note that the @xmath80 sign on the left refers to the action @xmath879 of @xmath19 on @xmath2 , whereas that on the right refers to the action @xmath913 of @xmath914 on @xmath526 . ) this shows that an affine map @xmath159 is determined once the linear map @xmath9 between the underlying vector spaces is given and the image @xmath497 of an arbitrary point @xmath140 is specified . equation ( [ eq : affinemap2 ] ) can be rephrased as follows : setting @xmath915 equation ( [ eq : affinemap2 ] ) is equivalent to @xmath916 for all @xmath917 . in view of the alternative definition of affine spaces suggested by proposition[thm : altdefaffspace ] , this shows that we could have defined affine maps alternatively to ( [ eq : affinemap1 ] ) by ( @xmath918 is the difference map in @xmath526 ) @xmath919 affine bijections of an affine space @xmath878 onto itself form a group , the _ affine group _ , denoted by @xmath920 . group multiplication is just given by composition of maps , that is @xmath921 . it is immediate that the composed maps again satisfy ( [ eq : affinemap1 ] ) . for any @xmath45 , the map @xmath922 is an affine bijection for which @xmath923 . note that in this case ( [ eq : affinemap1 ] ) simply turns into the requirement @xmath924 for all @xmath106 , which is clearly satisfied due to @xmath19 being a commutative group . hence there is a natural embedding @xmath925 , the image @xmath926of which is called the subgroup of _ translations_. the map @xmath927 defines a group homomorphism @xmath928 , since @xmath929 . we have just seen that the translations are in the kernel of this map . in fact , the kernel is equal to the subgroup @xmath926 of translations , as one easily infers from ( [ eq : affinemap3 ] ) with @xmath923 , which is equivalent to @xmath930 for all @xmath917 . hence there exists a @xmath45 such that for all @xmath507 we have @xmath931 . the quotient group @xmath932 is then clearly isomorphic to @xmath933 . there are also embeddings @xmath934 , but no canonical one : each one depends on the choice of a reference point @xmath935 , and is given by @xmath936 , where @xmath937 for all @xmath507 . this shows that @xmath920 is isomorphic to the semi - direct product @xmath938 , though the isomorphism depends on the choice of @xmath935 . the action of @xmath939 on @xmath507 is then defined by @xmath940 which is easily checked to define indeed an ( @xmath108 dependent ) action of @xmath938 on @xmath2 . [ def : linearframe ] a * linear frame * of the @xmath18-dimensional vector space @xmath19 over @xmath876 is a basis @xmath941 of @xmath19 , regarded as a linear isomorphism @xmath942 , given by @xmath943 . the set of linear frames of @xmath19 is denoted by @xmath944 . there is a natural right action of @xmath946 on @xmath944 , given by @xmath947 . it is immediate that this action is simply transitive . it is sometimes called the _ passive interpretation _ of the transformation group @xmath946 , presumably because it moves the frames associated to the observer and not the points of @xmath19 . on the other hand , any frame @xmath9 induces an isomorphism of algebras @xmath948 , given by @xmath949 . if @xmath950 , then @xmath951 , where @xmath941 . restricted to @xmath952 , this induces a group isomorphism @xmath953 and hence an @xmath9-dependent action of @xmath946 on @xmath19 by linear transformations , defined by @xmath954 , where @xmath955 . this is sometimes called the _ active interpretation _ of the transformation group @xmath946 , presumably because it really moves the points of @xmath19 . [ def : affineframe ] an * affine frame * of the @xmath18-dimensional affine space @xmath878 over @xmath876 is a tuple @xmath956 , where @xmath108 is a base point in @xmath2 and @xmath942 is a linear frame of @xmath19 . @xmath159 is regarded as a map @xmath957 , given by @xmath958 . we denote the set of affine frames by @xmath959 . if we regard @xmath945 as an affine space @xmath961 , it comes with a distinguished base point @xmath108 , the zero vector . the group @xmath962 is therefore naturally isomorphic to @xmath963 . the latter naturally acts on @xmath945 in the standard way , @xmath964 , where group multiplication is given by @xmath965 the group @xmath963 has a natural right action on @xmath959 , where @xmath966 . explicitly , for @xmath967 and @xmath968 , this action reads : @xmath969 it is easy to verify directly that this is an action which , moreover , is again simply transitive . it is referred to as the _ passive interpretation _ of the affine group @xmath963 . conversely , depending on the choice of an affine frame @xmath970 , there is a group isomorphism @xmath971 , given by @xmath972 , and hence an @xmath159 dependent action of @xmath963 by affine maps on @xmath878 . if @xmath968 and @xmath973 , the action reads @xmath974 this is called the _ active interpretation _ of the affine group @xmath963 . an affine frame @xmath975 with @xmath941 defines @xmath976 points @xmath977 , where @xmath978 and @xmath979 for @xmath980 . conversely , any @xmath976 points @xmath977 in affine space , for which @xmath981 are linearly independent , define an affine frame . note that this linear independence does not depend on the choice of @xmath982 as our base point , as one easily sees from the identity @xmath983 which holds for any set @xmath984 of @xmath985 points in affine space . to prove it one just needs ( [ eq : affdistributivity ] ) . hence we say that these points are _ affinely independent _ iff , e.g. , the set of @xmath0 vectors @xmath986 is linearly independent . therefore , an affine frame of @xmath18-dimensional affine space is equivalent to @xmath976 affinely independent points . such a set of points is also called an _ affine basis_. this motivates writing the sums on the right hand sides of ( [ eq : affbasisexp ] ) in a perfectly symmetric way without preference of any point @xmath995 : @xmath996 where the right hand side is defined by any of the expressions ( [ eq : affbasisexp ] ) . this defines certain _ linear combinations _ of affine points , namely those whose coefficients add up to one . accordingly , the _ affine span _ of points @xmath997 in affine space is defined by @xmath998 harvey brown and oliver pooley . minkowski space - time : a glorious non - entity . in dennis dieks , editor , _ the ontology of spacetime _ , volume 1 of _ philosophy and foundations of physics _ , pages 6792 , 2006 . andrzej trautman . foundations and current problems of general relativity . in andrzej trautman , felix pirani , and hermann bondi , editors , _ lectures on general relativity _ , volume 1 of _ brandeis summer institute in theoretical physics _ , pages 1248 . prentice - hall , inc . , englewood cliffs , new jersey , 1964 . Abstract:

Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.

Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered . Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video . Paper: any conceivable theory of structure formation in the universe predicts statistical properties of observable quantities . therefore , the analysis of the present inhomogeneity of the universe is inevitably statistical . however , what kind of statistics is useful is not obvious , since we can invent infinite number of statistics to be analyzed . whether we can adopt better statistical descriptions is of great importance in this sense . each statistic has both advantages and disadvantages . the power spectrum , for example , can fully characterize the random gaussian fields , while it does not contain any information on the non - gaussianity , which contains significant information in the gravitational instability theory . among various statistical quantities , there is a promising class of statistics which utilizes smoothed cosmic fields . the smoothed field has less noisy property than the actual ( unsmoothed , or raw ) cosmic fields , such as galaxy distributions , temperature fluctuations of cosmic microwave background ( cmb ) , shear fields of the gravitational lensing , and so forth . perhaps the simplest example of such statistics is the variance @xmath0 of smoothed density contrast @xmath1 , which is a function of smoothing length @xmath2 . similarly , higher - order cumulants @xmath3 ( @xmath4 ) are also simple statistics . the density probability distribution function ( pdf ) @xmath5 , which in principle can be constructed from the hierarchy of cumulants ( e.g. , * ? ? ? * ) , is an another example of popular statistics of smoothed cosmic fields . rather recently , more complex statistics of smoothed cosmic fields have become popular in cosmology , such as the genus statistic @xcite , density peak statistics @xcite , area , length , level - crossing statistics @xcite , minkowski functionals @xcite , etc . these statistics provide assuring characterizations of the clustering pattern that can not be perceived only by the hierarchy of cumulants or by the pdf . the genus statistic is a powerful measure of the morphology in the 3-dimensional @xcite , and 2-dimensional @xcite clustering of galaxies and clusters , and also of the pattern of temperature fluctuations of cmb radiation @xcite . the peak statistics of the 3-dimensional density field are frequently used in connection with the statistics of the collapsing object @xcite , while the peak statistics of the cmb fluctuations @xcite and of the weak lensing fields @xcite are suitable for constraining cosmological models . the area , length , and level - crossing statistics directly quantify the amount of contour surfaces @xcite . the minkowski functionals @xcite , which are closely related to the above statistics , are also applied to smoothed cosmic fields @xcite . these statistics of smoothed density fields are considered as powerful descriptors of the statistical information of the universe . it is therefore essential to establish theoretical predictions of the behavior of such statistics so that we can effectively and ideally analyze the data of our universe . recent developments of the perturbation theory ( for review , see * ? ? ? * ) in calculating the variance , the cumulants , and the pdf are remarkable . the perturbation theory becomes more and more useful because the recent developments of observations enable us to have widely covered sample volume of the universe , which can minimize undesirable strongly nonlinear effects which we do not understand well . the direct comparison of the theoretical predictions of the perturbation theory with the actual data is a promising field of research in this sense . in the case of top - hat smoothing function , @xcite and @xcite used the tree - level ( i.e. , lowest - order ) perturbation theory to obtain the third- and forth - order cumulants , i.e. , the skewness and the kurtosis . the same quantities with gaussian smoothing are calculated by @xcite , @xcite and @xcite . quite cleverly , @xcite took advantage of special properties of the top - hat smoothing function , and succeeded to obtain full hierarchy of higher order moments in the tree - level perturbation theory . he also obtained the pdf from this hierarchy of cumulants , which remarkably describes the nonlinear behavior of the gravitational instability in numerical simulations . beyond the tree - level calculation , the perturbation theory with loop - corrections has been also developed @xcite . because of the simplicity of the statistics , calculating the variance , the cumulants and the pdf were primarily the playground of perturbation - theorists . the evaluation of other statistics by the perturbation theory is less trivial . a quite useful technique is the edgeworth expansion , which was first applied to cosmology in calculating the pdf from seeds perturbations by @xcite , and from non - linear perturbation theory by @xcite , and @xcite . the analytic expression of the genus statistics in the perturbation theory is derived by @xcite , whose technique corresponds to multivariate version of the edgeworth expansion . in some literatures the edgeworth expansion is used in connecting the statistics and dynamics of the universe @xcite . the purpose of this paper is to give a comprehensive description of the formalism by which the perturbative evaluation is possible for wide range of non - trivial statistics of smoothed cosmic fields in general . since the number of spatial dimensions of our universe is three , the statistics of large - scale cosmic fields are defined in either one- , two- , or three - dimensional space . for example , the space of the density field in a redshift map of galaxies or quasars is three - dimensional . a projected galaxy map on the sky , a shear field of gravitational lensing , and temperature fluctuations of cmb on the sky are fields in two - dimensional space . the absorption lines of quasar spectra and pencil - beam surveys of galaxies define fields in one - dimensional space . thus it is useful to develop our statistical method in @xmath6-dimensions for generality . as illustrative examples of applications of our method , we calculate level - crossing statistic ( or equivalently length and area statistics ) , genus statistics , density - extrema statistics and minkowski functionals . as cosmic fields , we consider density and velocity fields in three dimensions , the projected density field of galaxies in two dimensions . the basic formalism and results of the second order theory are presented in this paper . we will give results of the third order theory in a future paper , which are technically more involved . the primary purpose of the present paper is to fully describe the basic formalism for the statistics of smoothed cosmic fields in perturbation theory . applications of the second order theory to popular statistics and cosmic fields are systematically presented . thus , this paper is in some way a mixture of the new results and comprehensive review of the old results . the major new results in this paper are : * explicit formulas of the lowest non - gaussian correction in various smoothed cosmic fields in @xmath6-dimensions , including all the minkowski functionals . they are presented as functions of both density threshold and rescaled threshold by volume - fraction . * relations among several statistics of the smoothed field are clarified . * derivatives of skewness parameter of the velocity field and projected 2d field are derived in second order perturbation theory of gravitational instability theory . especially , skewness parameters with gaussian smoothing are detailed . these quantities are particularly important to perturbatively evaluate the statistics of smoothed field . * genus curve against the scaled threshold in perturbation theory is discussed and a theory - motivated new asymmetry parameter in genus curve is introduced . this paper is structured in the following way . [ sec2 ] and [ sec3 ] are carrying out a mathematical exercise of expressing high - order terms in terms of skewness parameters ; the physics of gravity only enters once one actually calculates the skewness parameters in [ sec4 ] . thus [ sec2 ] and [ sec3 ] are a derivation of an extension of the edgeworth expansion , and the basic results are equations ( [ eq1 - 13 ] ) and ( [ eq1 - 17 ] ) . in [ sec3 ] , popular statistics of smoothed fields are examined . the second - order expressions in terms of the skewness parameters are given for pdf , level - crossing statistics , 2-dimensional and 3-dimensional genus statistics , 2-dimensional weighted extrema , and minkowski functionals in [ sec3 - 1][sec3 - 6 ] . these quantities are re - expressed as functions of the volume - fraction threshold in [ sec3 - 7 ] . the skewness parameters for several cosmic fields are calculated in [ sec4 ] , applying the second order perturbation theory . detailed calculations of the simple hierarchical model , the 3-dimensional density field , the velocity field , the 2-dimensional projected density field , and the weak lensing field are given in [ sec4 - 1][sec4 - 5 ] . the effect of biasing on the skewness parameters are discussed in [ sec4 - 6 ] . we discuss implications of our second - order results in we introduce a theory - motivated asymmetry factor to characterize the shift of the genus curve in this section . the conclusions are given in useful gaussian integrals including hermite polynomials are given in appendix [ app1 ] . the bispectrum in a two - dimensional projected field is reviewed in appendix [ app2 ] . the symbols in this paper are summarized in appendix [ app3 ] . we consider a cosmic random field @xmath7 which represents any field constructed from observable quantities of the universe , such as three - dimensional density field , velocity field , or two - dimensional projected density field , shear or convergence field of weak lensing , temperature fluctuations of cmb , etc . the coordinates @xmath8 can be either three- , two- , or one - dimensions . we assume the field @xmath9 is already smoothed by a smoothing function @xmath10 with smoothing length @xmath2 which cuts the high frequency fluctuations which suffer strongly nonlinear effects : @xmath11 where @xmath12 is the dimension of the space @xmath8 , and @xmath13 is a raw , unsmoothed field . two of the most popular 3d smoothing functions are the tophat smoothing function @xmath14 and the gaussian smoothing function @xmath15 we also assume that the mean value of the field @xmath9 is zero , and that the existence the variance @xmath16 : @xmath17 it is convenient to introduce a normalized field @xmath18 which has a unit variance as follows : @xmath19 the statistics of a smoothed cosmic field we are interested in are the functions of the field @xmath18 and its spatial derivatives as we will see in the following sections . we denote the series of spatial derivatives by a set of variables @xmath20 which is defined by , for example , in 3d case , @xmath21 where @xmath22 . for convenience , the index is denoted as @xmath23 , 1 , 2 , 3 , ( 11 ) , ( 22 ) , ( 33 ) , ( 12 ) , ( 13 ) , ( 23 ) , @xmath24 in such cases . in this example of equation ( [ eq1 - 4 ] ) , only the value of the field and of the derivatives on a single point is considered , but in general , more than two points can be considered . the set @xmath25 forms multivariate random fields , which is denoted as an @xmath26-dimensional vector @xmath27 in the following . the dimension @xmath26 is the total number of derivatives which appear in the definition of the statistics we are interested in . the statistical information is described by the multivariate pdf , @xmath28 . the fourier transform of the pdf is the partition function : @xmath29 at this point , the cumulant expansion theorem ( e.g. , * ? ? ? * ) is very useful . this theorem states that @xmath30 is the generating function of the cumulants , @xmath31 : @xmath32 it follows from @xmath33 that @xmath34 , and first several cumulants are given by @xmath35 and so forth . from equations ( [ eq1 - 6 ] ) and ( [ eq1 - 7a ] ) , the partition function is given by @xmath36 where @xmath37 is an @xmath38 matrix whose components are given by @xmath39 . on the other hand , the equation ( [ eq1 - 5 ] ) is inverted as @xmath40 substituting @xmath41 in the last term of equation ( [ eq1 - 8 ] ) , the distribution function of equation ( [ eq1 - 9 ] ) can be transformed in a form @xmath42 where @xmath43 is the multivariate gaussian distribution function characterized by the correlation matrix @xmath37 . any statistical quantity of a smoothed cosmic field is expressed by an average @xmath44 of a certain function @xmath45 as we will see in the following sections . thus , from equation ( [ eq1 - 10 ] ) , we obtain @xmath46 where @xmath47 denotes the averaging by the gaussian distribution function of equation ( [ eq1 - 11b ] ) . this form , equation ( [ eq1 - 12b ] ) , is useful when the deviation from the gaussian distribution is not large . in principle , this equation reduces the general statistical averaging procedure to gaussian integrations . however , it contains the infinite series , thus we have to truncate this expression by some criteria . in most cases of interest , the weakly nonlinear evolution of cosmic fields satisfy @xmath48 , as we will see in [ sec4 ] . when this relation holds , we can expand the distribution function to arbitrary order in @xmath49 . in the following , we assume this relation , and introduce the normalized cumulants : @xmath50 which are assumed to be of order one in terms of @xmath49 . in this case , the equation ( [ eq1 - 12b ] ) is expanded as , up to @xmath51 , @xmath52 { \sigma_0}^2 + { \cal o}({\sigma_0}^3 ) , \label{eq1 - 13}\end{aligned}\ ] ] where we introduce the notation , @xmath53 etc . the calculation of the factors @xmath54 is performed for individual statistic which gives the explicit form of the function @xmath55 . in the expansion of equation ( [ eq1 - 13 ] ) , we need to calculate the gaussian average of derivatives of the function @xmath55 : @xmath56 in most cases , the evaluation is analytically feasible because only gaussian integration is needed . for the evaluation of such integration , we need the correlation matrix @xmath37 . throughout this paper , we consider statistically homogeneous , and isotropic fields , in which case , the correlation matrix @xmath37 is simplified because of the symmetry . in fact , the correlation matrix takes the following forms : @xmath57 where @xmath58 etc . and we define the following quantities : @xmath59 in most cases of interest , the derivatives of order higher than two do not appear in the definition of the statistics , so we do not give explicit form of those correlations . in the following , we use the notation @xmath60 and @xmath61 following @xcite . as is often the case , when the second order derivatives @xmath62 appears in @xmath55 as simple polynomials , the following transform is particularly useful : @xmath63 this transform erase the correlation between @xmath18 and @xmath64 , and the non - zero correlations are only @xmath65 where @xmath66 the gaussian integration is straightforward if the function @xmath55 is expressed by polynomials of @xmath64 . if the function @xmath55 is more complicated in which @xmath62 are not simply given by polynomials , it is useful to completely diagonalize the correlation matrix @xmath37 of equations ( [ eq1 - 13 - 2a])([eq1 - 13 - 2a ] ) . we introduce the following transform , which is quite similar one in @xcite : @xmath67 if @xmath68 , we ignore the variables @xmath69 , and similarly , if @xmath70 , we ignore the variable @xmath71 in the above equations and in the following . the above transform is similar to @xcite but notice it is not identical . this transform completely diagonalize the correlation matrix : @xmath72 and all non - diagonal correlations are zero . for later convenience , we write the inverse relation of the transform of @xmath73 , @xmath74 , and @xmath71 : @xmath75 if @xmath76 does not appear in the function @xmath55 , the variable @xmath71 should be omitted in the above equations . if both @xmath77 and @xmath76 do not appear in the function @xmath55 , the variables @xmath74 and @xmath71 should be omitted . after expressing the function @xmath55 in terms of the diagonalized variables @xmath18 , @xmath78 , @xmath73 , @xmath74 , @xmath71 and @xmath79 , the calculation of the gaussian integration of equation ( [ eq1 - 13 - 1 ] ) is performed . in this paper , only first two terms in equation ( [ eq1 - 13 ] ) are considered . thus we evaluate @xmath80 here . when the spatial symmetry is taken into account , the quantity @xmath80 reduces to the following expressions : @xmath81 , \label{eq1 - 14e}\\ & & \langle\alpha_{,i}\alpha_{,j}\alpha_{,k}\rangle = 0 , \label{eq1 - 14f}\\ & & \langle\alpha_{,i}\alpha_{,j}\alpha_{,kl}\rangle = \frac{\langle(\nabla\alpha\cdot\nabla\alpha)\nabla^2\alpha\rangle } { d(d-1 ) } \left [ \delta_{ij}\delta_{kl } - \frac12 \left(\delta_{ik}\delta_{jl } + \delta_{il}\delta_{jk}\right ) \right ] , \label{eq1 - 14g}\\ & & \langle\alpha_{,i}\alpha_{,jk}\alpha_{,lm}\rangle = 0 , \label{eq1 - 14h}\end{aligned}\ ] ] etc . to prove the above equations , the following identities for isotropic fields are useful : @xmath82 although the above equations are valid for @xmath83 , the case @xmath68 is obtained by just ignoring the terms with @xmath84 . generally , more complicated quantities can be appeared for @xmath80 , but the above relations are sufficient for our applications in this paper . according to the spatial symmetry of the above equations , the third - order correlations @xmath85 are explicitly given . at this point , it is useful to define the following quantities : @xmath86 we call quantities @xmath87 skewness parameters . the first one @xmath88 is usually called as skewness , and the others are its derivatives . they are to be calculated from usual perturbation theories in [ sec4 ] . using these quantities , the third - order correlations are given by @xmath89 , \qquad ( i \ne j ) , \label{eq1 - 16i}\\ & & { \widehat{m}^{(3)}}_{0(ii)(jk ) } = 0 , \qquad ( j < k ) , \label{eq1 - 16j}\\ & & { \widehat{m}^{(3)}}_{0(ij)(ij ) } = - \frac{1}{d(d+2)}\frac{{\sigma_1}^4}{{\sigma_0}^4 } \left [ s^{(2 ) } - s^{(2)}_2 \right ] \qquad ( i < j ) , \label{eq1 - 16k}\\ & & { \widehat{m}^{(3)}}_{0(ij)(kl ) } = 0 , \qquad ( i < j , k < l , i \ne k ) , \label{eq1 - 16l}\\ & & { \widehat{m}^{(3)}}_{ijk } = 0 , \label{eq1 - 16m}\\ & & { \widehat{m}^{(3)}}_{ii(ii ) } = 0 , \label{eq1 - 16n}\\ & & { \widehat{m}^{(3)}}_{ii(jj ) } = - \frac{2}{3 d^2}\frac{{\sigma_1}^4}{{\sigma_0}^4 } s^{(2 ) } , \qquad ( i \ne j ) , \label{eq1 - 16o}\\ & & { \widehat{m}^{(3)}}_{ii(jk ) } = 0 , \qquad ( j < k ) , \label{eq1 - 16p}\\ & & { \widehat{m}^{(3)}}_{ij(kk ) } = 0 , \qquad ( i \ne j ) , \label{eq1 - 16q}\\ & & { \widehat{m}^{(3)}}_{ij(ij ) } = \frac{1}{3 d^2}\frac{{\sigma_1}^4}{{\sigma_0}^4 } s^{(2 ) } , \qquad ( i < j ) , \label{eq1 - 16r}\\ & & { \widehat{m}^{(3)}}_{ij(kl ) } = 0 , \qquad ( i < j , k < l , i \ne k ) , \label{eq1 - 16s}\\ & & { \widehat{m}^{(3)}}_{i(jk)(lm ) } = 0 , \label{eq1 - 16t}\end{aligned}\ ] ] and so forth , where repeated indices are _ not _ summed over in the above equations , and @xmath90 is symmetric under permutation of its indices . thus , denoting @xmath91 for simplicity , @xmath92 \nonumber\\ & & \quad\qquad + \ , \frac{3 s^{(2)}_2}{d(d+2 ) } \frac{{\sigma_1}^4}{{\sigma_0}^4 } \left ( 3 \sum_{i } f_{0(ii)(ii ) } + 2 \sum_{i < j } f_{0(ii)(jj ) } + \sum_{i < j } f_{0(ij)(ij ) } \right ) + \cdots . \label{eq1 - 17}\end{aligned}\ ] ] this equation gives the second - order correction term of the statistical quantity @xmath44 through equation ( [ eq1 - 13 ] ) . once the field @xmath9 is specified , the skewness parameters @xmath87 are calculated by dynamical perturbation theory of the field @xmath9 . the remaining factors in the above equation are the gaussian integrations of the derivatives of the function @xmath55 , i.e. , @xmath93 . these factors can be calculated once the function @xmath55 is given . in the next section , we calculate the latter factors for individual statistics . in this section we calculate the factor @xmath94 for each statistic . some of the results in this section have been previously presented . the edgeworth expansion of the pdf in [ sec3 - 1 ] is a familiar result . the result of 3d genus statistic in [ sec3 - 4 ] was already given by @xcite . we include these old results for completeness . other subsections present new results . perhaps the simplest yet non - trivial statistic is the pdf , @xmath95 . the perturbative expansion of the pdf is known as the edgeworth expansion @xcite . as the simplest example , we re - derive the known edgeworth expansion from the point of view of our general formalism above ( see also * ? ? ? * ) . since the pdf is simply given by @xmath96 , where @xmath97 is the dirac s delta function , the function @xmath55 in the previous section for pdf @xmath95 is given by @xmath98 since this form of @xmath55 does not depend on derivatives of @xmath18 , only @xmath99 survives in the equation ( [ eq1 - 17 ] ) . from equation ( [ eqa1 - 4a ] ) with @xmath100 and @xmath101 , @xmath102 , where @xmath103 . thus , the pdf is derived from the equation ( [ eq1 - 13 ] ) : @xmath104 , \label{eq2 - 0 - 2}\end{aligned}\ ] ] which reproduces the well - known result . there is less advantage of applying our formalism to this simple statistic which can be treated by standard methods . our formalism has advantages when more non - trivial statistics are considered as shown below . next three statistics we consider here are the level - crossing statistic @xmath105 , the length statistic @xmath106 and the area statistic @xmath107 . the level - crossing statistic is defined by the mean number of intersection of a straight line and threshold contours of the field . the length statistic is defined by the mean length of intersection of a 2d surface and the threshold contours of the field . the area statistic is defined by the mean area of the contour surface in a 3d space @xcite . the level - crossing statistic is defined for 1d , 2d , and 3d cosmic fields , the length statistic is defined for 2d and 3d cosmic fields , while the area statistic is defined only for 3d cosmic fields . for statistically isotropic fields , those three statistics are proportional to each other . in general , a statistic of the smoothed field @xmath9 is a function of the threshold @xmath108 , or of the normalized threshold @xmath109 . the explicit expressions of statistics @xmath105 , @xmath106 , and @xmath107 are given by @xcite @xmath110^{1/2 } \right\rangle , \label{eq2 - 1b}\\ & & n_3(\nu ) = \left\langle \delta(\alpha - \nu ) \left [ ( \eta_1)^2 + ( \eta_2)^2 + ( \eta_3)^2 \right]^{1/2 } \right\rangle . \label{eq2 - 1c}\end{aligned}\ ] ] for isotropic fields , these statistics are actually equivalent @xcite . in fact , the distribution function of @xmath111 for fixed @xmath112 is the function of only the magnitude @xmath113 . thus , using spherical coordinates for @xmath114 , one can see @xmath115 i.e. , @xmath116 thus we only need to consider @xmath105 which has the simplest expression and the rests of the statistics are automatically given by equation ( [ eq2 - 2 ] ) . however , if the field is anisotropic , such as the density field in redshift space @xcite , the equation ( [ eq2 - 2 ] ) no longer holds , and equations ( [ eq2 - 1a])([eq2 - 1c ] ) should be used for each statistic . the equation ( [ eq1 - 17 ] ) only holds for statistically isotropic fields , but the equation ( [ eq1 - 13 ] ) is applicable even for anisotropic fields . now we calculate the factor @xmath117 for the particular statistic @xmath105 . the indices @xmath118 only take @xmath119 and @xmath120 for @xmath105 statistic . let the number of @xmath119 be @xmath121 and the number of @xmath120 be @xmath122 . then the factor is given by @xmath123 since the variables @xmath18 and @xmath78 are uncorrelated in the gaussian averaging , we can use equations ( [ eqa1 - 4a ] ) and ( [ eqa1 - 5a ] ) in appendix [ app1 ] . thus the above gaussian integration results in @xmath124 where @xmath125 is given by equation ( [ eqa1 - 3 ] ) . now , calculation of equation ( [ eq1 - 17 ] ) is straightforward : @xmath126 . \label{eq2 - 5}\end{aligned}\ ] ] on the other hand , the gaussian contribution is simply given by @xmath127 thus , the perturbative expansion of equation ( [ eq1 - 13 ] ) up to second order is finally given by @xmath128 \sigma_0 + { \cal o}({\sigma_0}^2 ) \right\}. \label{eq2 - 7}\end{aligned}\ ] ] the second order formulas for area and length statistics are given by equation ( [ eq2 - 2 ] ) with the above equation . to evaluate the above formula , the factor @xmath88 and @xmath129 should be known . those factors are evaluated by usual perturbation theory in the following section . the next statistics we consider are the genus statistics . the genus statistics have been attractive because it has a geometrical meaning of the clustering as well as the cosmological significance . the 2d genus statistic @xmath130 is defined in a two - dimensional plane @xmath131 in a @xmath6-dimensional space , so that @xmath132 is required . in this plane @xmath131 , there are contours corresponding to each threshold @xmath133 . the 2d genus statistic is defined by the number of contours surrounding regions higher than the threshold value minus the number of contours surrounding regions lower than the threshold value @xcite . this definition is intuitive , but an alternative , equivalent definition is more useful : first we set an arbitrary , fixed direction on the plane @xmath131 . then there are maxima and minima of contours according to that direction . these points are classified into upcrossing points and downcrossing points with respect to that chosen direction . the number of those points are used to define the 2d genus statistic as the following way : @xmath134 , \label{eq2 - 8}\end{aligned}\ ] ] per unit area of the surface . according to this definition , the explicit expression of the 2d genus statistic is given by @xmath135 for this statistic , the indices @xmath136 only take @xmath119 , @xmath120 , @xmath137 and @xmath138 . let the number of @xmath119 be @xmath121 , @xmath120 be @xmath139 , @xmath137 be @xmath140 , and @xmath138 be @xmath141 . then we need to calculate the following quantity : @xmath142 since the second derivative @xmath143 appears as a polynomial , we just use the transform of equation ( [ eq1 - 13 - 3 - 1 ] ) . then , from equations ( [ eqa1 - 4a ] ) , ( [ eqa1 - 5a ] ) and ( [ eqa1 - 5b ] ) , the above equation reduces to @xmath144 . \label{eq2 - 11}\end{aligned}\ ] ] thus , from equation ( [ eq1 - 17 ] ) , @xmath145 - 2 s^{(2 ) } \left ( \frac{\sigma_1}{\sqrt{d}\sigma_0 } \right)^4 r(0;0;2,1 ) \nonumber\\ & = & \frac{1}{(2\pi)^{3/2 } } \left ( \frac{\sigma_1}{\sqrt{d}\sigma_0 } \right)^2 e^{-\nu^2/2 } \left [ s^{(0 ) } h_4(\nu ) + 4 s^{(1 ) } h_2(\nu ) + 2 s^{(2 ) } \right ] . \label{eq2 - 12}\end{aligned}\ ] ] on the other hand , the gaussian contribution is simply given by @xmath146 thus , the perturbative expansion of equation ( [ eq1 - 13 ] ) up to second order is finally given by @xmath147 \sigma_0 + { \cal o}({\sigma_0}^2 ) \right\}. \label{eq2 - 14}\end{aligned}\ ] ] the second order formula for 3d genus statistic was already derived by @xcite , but the detailed derivation was omitted . for completeness , we revisit the same quantity from our general point of view here . while the 2d genus statistic is defined by the number of contour lines in 2d surface , the 3d genus statistic @xcite is defined by the number of contour surfaces and the number of handles in 3d space . thus the 3d genus is defined only for cosmic fields of @xmath148 . the 3d genus statistic @xmath149 is defined by @xmath150 , \label{eq2 - 15}\end{aligned}\ ] ] per unit volume of the 3d space . this quantity is mathematically equivalent to @xmath151 times euler characteristic of the contour surfaces , and thus is proportional to the total surface integral of local curvature of contours from the gauss - bonnet theorem . although those definition is intuitive , an alternative , equivalent definition is more useful as in the 2d genus case . we set an arbitrary direction in the 3d space . then there are maxima , minima and saddle points according to that direction . from the number of these points , the 3d genus is defined by @xmath152 , \label{eq2 - 16}\end{aligned}\ ] ] per unit volume . according to this definition , the explicit expression of the 3d genus statistic is given by @xcite @xmath153 we need to calculate the following quantity : @xmath154 after applying the transform of equation ( [ eq1 - 13 - 3 - 1 ] ) , the gaussian integration of @xmath64 fixing @xmath18 is given by @xmath155 , \label{eq2 - 19}\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath156 is defined in table [ tab1 ] . ccc|ccc @xmath157 & @xmath158 & @xmath159 & @xmath160 & @xmath161 & @xmath162 + @xmath119 & @xmath119 & @xmath119 & @xmath120 & @xmath119 & @xmath163 + @xmath120 & @xmath119 & @xmath119 & @xmath119 & @xmath120 & @xmath163 + @xmath119 & @xmath120 & @xmath119 & @xmath119 & @xmath120 & @xmath163 + @xmath120 & @xmath120 & @xmath119 & @xmath119 & @xmath119 & @xmath164 + @xmath119 & @xmath119 & @xmath137 & @xmath119 & @xmath119 & @xmath165 + then , from equations ( [ eqa1 - 4a ] ) , ( [ eqa1 - 5a ] ) and ( [ eqa1 - 5b ] ) , the equation ( [ eq2 - 18 ] ) reduces to @xmath166 . \label{eq2 - 20}\end{aligned}\ ] ] since the 3d genus is only defined for @xmath167 and our universe has the spatial dimension 3 , only @xmath148 is meaningful for actual cosmic fields . nevertheless , we preserve the general dimension @xmath6 for some flavor of generality . thus , from equation ( [ eq1 - 17 ] ) , @xmath168 . \label{eq2 - 21}\end{aligned}\ ] ] the gaussian contribution is given by @xcite @xmath169 thus , the perturbative expansion of equation ( [ eq1 - 13 ] ) up to second order is finally given by @xmath170 \sigma_0 + { \cal o}({\sigma_0}^2 ) \right\}. \label{eq2 - 23}\end{aligned}\ ] ] the above equation with @xmath148 agrees with @xcite , @xmath171 , and @xmath172 in @xcite are related to the notations here by @xmath173 , @xmath174 , @xmath175 . ] next , we consider the weighted extrema density above a threshold @xmath133 . the field extrema is defined to be points where all the first - order spatial derivatives of the field @xmath9 vanish : @xmath176 . the weight @xmath177 is associated to each extrema according to the number of negative eigenvalues of spatial second - order derivatives of the field . when the threshold is high enough , the weighted extrema are approximately identified with the field peaks . mathematically , this statistic is equivalent to the 2d genus statistics , according to the morse s theorem @xcite . therefore , we do not need to calculate separately to obtain the result on this statistic . however , we present the derivation of the extrema density as an alternative calculation to the 2d genus . the weighted extrema in 2d field is given by @xmath178 following the similar calculation of previous examples , and using equations in appendix [ app1 ] , we obtain @xmath179 , \label{eq2 - 25}\end{aligned}\ ] ] and the perturbative expansion of equation ( [ eq1 - 13 ] ) up to second order is finally given by @xmath180 \sigma_0 + { \cal o}({\sigma_0}^2 ) \right\}. \label{eq2 - 26}\end{aligned}\ ] ] this result is in fact equivalent to the 2d genus statistics given by equation ( [ eq2 - 14 ] ) . most of the minkowski functionals are closely related to statistics discussed above . in this subsection , we comprehensively describe the exact relation between the minkowski functionals @xmath181 of a smoothed field and the statistical quantities considered above . the minkowski functional of @xmath182 is simply the volume fraction of the excursion set @xmath183 which is defined by high - density regions above a given threshold @xmath133 : @xmath184 the other functionals with @xmath185 are defined by the integral of the curvatures on isodensity surfaces of the threshold @xmath133 @xcite . in 3-dimensions , @xmath148 , they are evaluated by a surface integration averaged over whole system of volume @xmath186 @xcite , i.e. , @xmath187 where the local minkowski functionals , @xmath188 are defined by the principal curvatures @xmath189 and @xmath190 of the surface oriented toward lower density values . in 2-dimensions , @xmath70 , the minkowski functionals of @xmath191 are evaluated by a line integration averaged over whole system of 2d volume ( surface ) @xmath186 @xcite , i.e. , @xmath192 where the local minkowski functionals , @xmath193 are defined by the principal curvature @xmath189 of the line oriented toward lower density values . all the minkowski functionals for a gaussian random field are analytically derived by @xcite : @xmath194 where the factor @xmath195 is the volume of the unit ball in @xmath121 dimensions , so that @xmath196 , @xmath197 , @xmath198 , @xmath199 @xcite . it turns out that the minkowski functionals in 2- and 3-dimensions are identical to the statistics @xmath105 , @xmath130 and @xmath149 in each dimensions , except for normalization factors . in fact , from the crofton s formula @xcite , the @xmath121-th minkowski functional is given by @xmath200 in this formula for body @xmath183 in @xmath6 dimensions , we consider an arbitrary @xmath121-dimensional hypersurface @xmath201 and calculate the euler characteristic @xmath202 of the intersection @xmath203 in @xmath121 dimensions . this quantity is integrated over the space @xmath204 of all conceivable hypersurfaces . the integration measure @xmath205 is normalized to give @xmath206 . from this formula , we can see the statistics @xmath149 , @xmath130 , @xmath105 are proportional to the minkowski functionals of @xmath207 , @xmath208 , @xmath209 . in fact , @xmath210 is given by @xmath211 times the 3d genus ( or , equivalently , @xmath212 times the euler number of boundaries , @xmath213 ) , @xmath214 is identical to the 2d genus , and @xmath215 is just @xmath212 times the number of level - crossing points @xcite . thus , minkowski functionals are given by @xmath216 where the boundary of the body @xmath183 is identified with the isodensity contours of threshold @xmath133 and the statistics on right hand sides are defined in @xmath6-dimensions . therefore , we have already obtained the weakly non - gaussian expressions for minkowski functionals , i.e. , the minkowski functionals of @xmath217 are given by the above equations and equations ( [ eq2 - 7 ] ) , ( [ eq2 - 14 ] ) , and ( [ eq2 - 23 ] ) . the gaussian parts of the above equations exactly reproduce the tomita s formula ( [ eq2 - 54 ] ) . the remaining minkowski functional is the volume functional @xmath218 in this case , from equation ( [ eqa1 - 4a ] ) in appendix [ app1 ] , @xmath219 so that equation ( [ eq1 - 17 ] ) reduces to @xmath220 the equivalent form can be obtained by integrating the edgeworth expansion of pdf , equation ( [ eq2 - 0 - 2 ] ) . all the formulas of minkowski functionals derived above for @xmath221 fit into a single expression : @xmath222 \sigma_0 + { \cal o}({\sigma_0}^2 ) \right\}. \label{eq2 - 60}\end{aligned}\ ] ] the density threshold @xmath133 so far is simply defined so that isodensity surface is identified by @xmath223 . however , the horizontal shift of the nonlinear genus curve etc . is considerably attributed to the nonlinear shift of probability distribution of the density field ( e.g. , * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? in order to cancel the latter shift , the threshold @xmath224 is defined so that the volume fraction @xmath225 on the high - density side of the isodensity surface equals to @xmath226 in fact , most of the work on genus analysis uses the genus curve plotted against the volume - fraction threshold @xmath224 . recently , @xcite re - expressed the weakly non - gaussian formula of genus curve @xcite in terms of @xmath224 , using perturbative expansion of the probability distribution function of the density field @xcite . we follow this method to re - express the weakly non - gaussian formulas of various statistical quantities derived above in terms of the volume - fraction threshold @xmath224 . the relation of @xmath133 and @xmath224 of weakly non - gaussian field is simply given by equating the two equations ( [ eq2 - 104 ] ) and ( [ eq2 - 105 ] ) . up to first order in @xmath49 , the relation reduces to @xmath227 it is straightforward to rewrite the various analytical formulas we derived above . the results for level - crossing statistic , 2d and 3d genus are respectively given by @xmath228 \sigma_0 + { \cal o}({\sigma_0}^2 ) \right\ } , \label{eq2 - 207a}\\ g_2({{\widetilde{\nu } } } ) & = & \rho_{\rm e2}({{\widetilde{\nu } } } ) = \frac{1}{(2\pi)^{3/2 } } \left(\frac{\sigma_1}{\sqrt{d}\sigma_0}\right)^2 e^{-{{\widetilde{\nu}}}^2/2 } \nonumber\\ & & \qquad\qquad\quad\times\ , \left\ { h_1({{\widetilde{\nu } } } ) + \left [ \frac23 \left(s^{(1 ) } - s^{(0)}\right ) h_2({{\widetilde{\nu } } } ) + \frac13 \left(s^{(2 ) } - s^{(0)}\right ) \right ] \sigma_0 + { \cal o}({\sigma_0}^2 ) \right\ } , \label{eq2 - 207b}\\ g_3({{\widetilde{\nu } } } ) & = & - \frac{1}{(2\pi)^2 } \left(\frac{\sigma_1}{\sqrt{d}\sigma_0}\right)^3 e^{-{{\widetilde{\nu}}}^2/2 } \nonumber\\ & & \qquad\qquad\times\ , \left\ { h_2({{\widetilde{\nu } } } ) + \left [ \left(s^{(1 ) } - s^{(0)}\right ) h_3({{\widetilde{\nu } } } ) + \left(s^{(2 ) } - s^{(0)}\right ) h_1({{\widetilde{\nu } } } ) \right ] \sigma_0 + { \cal o}({\sigma_0}^2 ) \right\ } , \label{eq2 - 207c}\end{aligned}\ ] ] the results for minkowski functionals of @xmath217 are again given by these equations and equations ( [ eq2 - 101a])([eq2 - 101c ] ) . all the minkowski functionals for @xmath229 fit into a single expression : @xmath230 \sigma_0 + { \cal o}({\sigma_0}^2 ) \right\}. \label{eq2 - 208}\end{aligned}\ ] ] remarkably , the highest - order hermite polynomial in the non - gaussian correction terms vanishes in each case . in addition , the skewness parameters only appear as combinations of the form , @xmath231 , which makes the result simpler compared with the original form with the direct threshold @xmath133 . as we will see in the following sections , the numerical values of @xmath232 are quite close , or even identical in some special models . this means that the non - gaussian corrections of the above statistics are smaller with the rescaled threshold @xmath224 than with the original threshold @xmath133 . this is one of the central results in this paper . this tendency is in agreement with the analyses of numerical simulations . we need to know the skewness parameters , @xmath87 for the evaluation of the second - order perturbative terms of equation ( [ eq1 - 17 ] ) . these quantities can be calculated by usual perturbation theory , once we specify the cosmic field , @xmath9 . in each example of the previous section , the quantity @xmath233 does not appear so that we evaluate @xmath88 , @xmath129 , and @xmath234 in this section . the other kinds of skewness parameters like @xmath233 can be similarly evaluated without difficulty . before we explore actual cosmic fields , we consider a simple , phenomenological statistical model , i.e. , the hierarchical model of higher order correlation functions ( e.g. , * ? ? ? * ) . in this model , @xmath26-point correlation function is a sum of @xmath235 products of the two - point correlation function . specifically , the three - point correlation function is given by @xmath236 . \label{eq4 - 1}\end{aligned}\ ] ] we assume the field @xmath9 in the above equation is already smoothed . in this case , skewness parameters , equations ( [ eq1 - 15a])([eq1 - 15d ] ) are given by straightforward calculations @xcite : @xmath237 these values depend on a hierarchical amplitude , @xmath238 , which is a free parameter of this model . the relative amplitudes among @xmath87 are not freely adjusted in the above equation . in the case of volume - fraction threshold , the first non - gaussian correction of the various statistics considered in the previous section is absent , since they depend only on @xmath239 . next , we consider the three - dimensional density field . the skewness parameters of this field in perturbation theory are already calculated by @xcite and @xcite , using fourier transforms of the field . we comprehensively review this calculation here for completeness . there is an alternative way to calculate the skewness not depending on fourier transforms @xcite . the cosmic field @xmath9 is identified with the 3d density contrast , @xmath240 , where @xmath241 is the density field . the dimension this field is defined in is three , @xmath148 . the fourier transform of the field is useful in the following : @xmath242 in this notation , two- and three - point correlations in fourier space have the forms , @xmath243 the above forms are the consequence of the statistical homogeneity of the space , where the functions @xmath244 and @xmath245 are the power spectrum and the bispectrum , respectively . thus , the variance and its variants [ eqs . ( [ eq1 - 2 ] ) , ( [ eq1 - 13 - 3a ] ) , and ( [ eq1 - 13 - 3b ] ) ] , in their fourier representation , are given by @xmath246 and the skewness parameters of equations ( [ eq1 - 15a])([eq1 - 15d ] ) are given by @xmath247 for initial random gaussian density field , the second order perturbation theory predicts the power spectrum and the bispectrum as follows ( e.g. , * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ) : @xmath248 { p_{\rm lin}}(k_1 ) { p_{\rm lin}}(k_2 ) w(k_1r ) w(k_2r ) w(k_3r ) \nonumber\\ & & \qquad\qquad\qquad\quad + \ , { \rm cyc.(1,2,3 ) } + { \cal o}({\sigma_0}^6 ) , \label{eq4 - 7b}\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath249 is the linear power spectrum , and @xmath201 is a weak function of cosmology @xcite . the field smoothing corresponds to the multiplication of the window function @xmath250 which is the three - dimensional fourier transform of the smoothing function @xmath10 . it is a good approximation to use the value of @xmath201 for an einstein - de sitter universe , @xmath251 , in most cases . the explicit form of the function @xmath201 in terms of cosmological parameters @xmath252 and @xmath253 is given by @xcite , which is accurately fitted by @xmath254 the perturbation theory is considered to be an expansion by a parameter @xmath49 . in this respect , the power spectrum @xmath244 and the bispectrum @xmath245 is of order @xmath16 and @xmath255 , respectively . substituting equation ( [ eq4 - 7a ] ) into equation ( [ eq4 - 5 ] ) , we obtain @xmath256 up to the lowest order . similarly , substituting equation ( [ eq4 - 7b ] ) into equations ( [ eq4 - 6a])([eq4 - 6c ] ) , and introducing new integration variables , @xmath257 , @xmath258 , and @xmath259 , we obtain @xmath260 where @xmath261 and @xmath262 \frac{w\left(\sqrt{{l_1}^2 + { l_2}^2 + 2 l_1 l_2 \mu } \right ) } { w(l_1 ) w(l_2 ) } \nonumber\\ & & \qquad\qquad\qquad \times\ , \left\ { \begin{array}{ll } \displaystyle 2 , & a=0,\\ { l_1}^2 + { l_2}^2 + l_1 l_2 \mu , & a=1,\\ 3\ , { l_1}^2 { l_2}^2 \left ( 1 - \mu^2 \right ) , & a=2 , \end{array } \right . \label{eq4 - 9}\end{aligned}\ ] ] so far the smoothing function is arbitrary . for a general smoothing function , the above equations can be numerically integrated to obtain the skewness parameters for each model of the power spectrum . for some smoothing functions , further analytical reductions of the above equations are possible . as a popular example , we consider the gaussian smoothing , @xmath263 , which is frequently adopted for practical purposes . we follow the similar technique of @xcite , in which they derived the skewness of the density field with gaussian smoothing . for the gaussian smoothing , @xmath264 in this case , the following formula of the modified bessel function @xmath265 is useful : @xmath266 where @xmath267 is the @xmath122-th legendre polynomial . from this formula , the angular integration of @xmath268 in equation ( [ eq4 - 9 ] ) can be analytically performed and the result is @xmath269 , \label{eq4 - 12a}\\ & & \widetilde{s}^{(1 ) } = \sqrt{2\pi l_1l_2 } \left\ { \frac{5 + 2e}{4 } \left(\frac{l_2}{l_1 } + \frac{l_1}{l_2}\right ) i_{1/2}(l_1l_2 ) - \left [ \frac{3(9 + e)}{10 } + \frac{{l_2}^2}{{l_1}^2 } + \frac{{l_1}^2}{{l_2}^2 } \right ] i_{3/2}(l_1l_2 ) \right . \nonumber\\ & & \qquad\qquad\qquad\qquad\qquad\qquad + \ , \left . \frac{2 - e}{2 } \left(\frac{l_2}{l_1 } + \frac{l_1}{l_2}\right ) i_{5/2}(l_1l_2 ) - \frac{3(1 - e)}{10 } i_{7/2}(l_1 l_2 ) \right\ } , \label{eq4 - 12b}\\ & & \widetilde{s}^{(2 ) } = \sqrt{2\pi}(l_1l_2)^{3/2 } \left [ \frac{3(3 + 2e)}{5 } i_{1/2}(l_1l_2 ) - \frac{9}{10 } \left(\frac{l_2}{l_1 } + \frac{l_1}{l_2}\right ) i_{3/2}(l_1l_2 ) \right . \nonumber\\ & & \qquad\qquad\qquad\qquad\qquad -\ , \left . \frac{3(3 + 4e)}{7 } i_{5/2}(l_1l_2 ) + \frac{9}{10 } \left(\frac{l_2}{l_1 } + \frac{l_1}{l_2}\right ) i_{7/2}(l_1l_2 ) - \frac{18(1 - e)}{35 } i_{9/2}(l_1l_2 ) \right ] . \label{eq4 - 12c}\end{aligned}\ ] ] at this point , it is useful to define the following quantity : @xmath270 in the above equation , variance parameters @xmath49 , @xmath271 are given by equation ( [ eq4 - 7 - 1 ] ) . the nonlinear correction for @xmath272 is not needed because our estimate of @xmath87 is only lowest order in @xmath49 . when the higher order corrections , e.g. , third - order perturbation corrections , are estimated , one should be sure that all the necessary nonlinear corrections are properly taken into account . with this quantity , the skewness parameters are given by @xmath273 , \label{eq4 - 14b}\\ & & s^{(2)}(r ) = 9 \left [ \frac{3 + 2e}{15 } s^{33}_0 - \frac15 s^{24}_1 - \frac{3 + 4e}{21 } s^{33}_2 + \frac15 s^{24}_3 - \frac{2(1-e)}{35 } s^{33}_4 \right ] . \label{eq4 - 14c}\end{aligned}\ ] ] thus the lowest order estimates of skewness parameters are given by the above equations ( [ eq4 - 13])([eq4 - 14c ] ) . for each given power spectrum , the integration of equation ( [ eq4 - 13 ] ) is straightforward . the resulting skewness parameters are independent on the amplitude of the power spectrum . when the power spectrum is given by a cdm - like model , @xmath274 , where @xmath275^{-1/4 } , \label{eq4 - 15}\end{aligned}\ ] ] is the cdm - like transfer function fitted by @xcite , and @xmath276 is the shape parameter of this model , then the skewness parameters are functions of @xmath277 . in table [ tab2 ] , we give the values of skewness parameters @xmath87 for cdm - like models for several values of @xmath277 . c|cccccc @xmath277 & @xmath278 & @xmath279 & @xmath280 & @xmath281 & @xmath282 & @xmath283 + @xmath88 & @xmath284 & @xmath285 & @xmath286 & @xmath287 & @xmath288 & @xmath289 + @xmath129 & @xmath290 & @xmath291 & @xmath292 & @xmath293 & @xmath294 & @xmath295 + @xmath234 & @xmath296 & @xmath297 & @xmath298 & @xmath299 & @xmath300 & @xmath301 + in this table , the value of @xmath201 is approximated by @xmath302 . since the skewness parameters are weak functions of @xmath277 as seen from the table , one can interpolate the values in this table to obtain the values of arbitrary scales for practical purposes . when the power spectrum is given by a power - law form , @xmath303 the integration of equation ( [ eq4 - 13 ] ) can be analytically performed . first , the simple gaussian integration gives @xmath304 second , we expand the modified bessel function as @xmath305 then the equation ( [ eq4 - 13 ] ) reduces to @xmath306 where @xmath307 , and @xmath55 is the gauss hypergeometric function : @xmath308 the equations ( [ eq4 - 14a])([eq4 - 14c ] ) and equation ( [ eq4 - 19 ] ) give the skewness parameters @xmath87 . the following recursion relations for hypergeometric function @xmath309 , \label{eq4 - 21b}\\ & & ( \gamma-\alpha)(\gamma-\beta)z f(\alpha,\beta,\gamma+1;z ) + \gamma[(\alpha+\beta-2\gamma+1)z+\gamma-1 ] f(\alpha,\beta,\gamma;z ) \nonumber\\ & & \qquad\qquad\qquad \ , + \gamma(\gamma-1)(z-1 ) f(\alpha,\beta,\gamma-1;z ) = 0 . \label{eq4 - 21c}\end{aligned}\ ] ] simplify the result : @xmath310 in this power - law case , skewness parameters do not depend on scales @xmath2 but only on power - law index , @xmath311 . incidentally , @xmath312 and @xmath313 are identical . this is just the coincidence and is not generally the case when the power spectrum is not given by power - law . several numerical values are shown in table [ tab3 ] , where @xmath251 is assumed . c|ccccccccc @xmath314 & @xmath315 & @xmath316 & @xmath317 & @xmath318 & @xmath319 & @xmath320 & @xmath321 & @xmath322 & @xmath278 + @xmath323 & @xmath324 & @xmath325 & @xmath326 & @xmath327 & @xmath328 & @xmath329 & @xmath330 & @xmath331 & @xmath332 + @xmath234 & @xmath333 & @xmath334 & @xmath335 & @xmath336 & @xmath337 & @xmath338 & @xmath339 & @xmath340 & @xmath341 + next , we consider the 3d velocity field as the cosmic field @xmath9 . since the rotational components of the velocity field are decaying modes of gravitational evolution in perturbation theory , we only consider the rotation - free component . the cosmic field @xmath9 is identified with the dimensionless scalar field , @xmath342 where @xmath343 is the hubble parameter . one can also consider other quantities like radial component of the velocity field , @xmath344 , where @xmath345 is the line - of - sight normal vector . those quantities are more complicated than a simple divergence . we illustrate only the simplest case in this paper . the second order perturbation theory predicts power spectrum and bispectrum of the velocity field as follows ( e.g. , * ? ? ? * ) : @xmath346 { p_{\rm lin}}(k_1 ) { p_{\rm lin}}(k_2 ) w(k_1r ) w(k_2r ) w(k_3r ) \nonumber\\ & & \qquad\qquad\qquad\quad + \ , { \rm cyc.(1,2,3 ) } + { \cal o}({\sigma_0}^6 ) . \label{eq4 - 24b}\end{aligned}\ ] ] in the above equation , the factor @xmath347 is a logarithmic derivative of the growth factor , given by @xmath348 @xcite and @xmath349 is the linear growth factor and @xmath350 is the expansion factor . the logarithmic derivative is evaluated at present . the factor @xmath351 is a weak function of cosmology . it is a good approximation to use the value for an einstein - de sitter universe , @xmath352 . the explicit form of the function @xmath351 in terms of @xmath353 and @xmath354 is given by @xcite , which is accurately fitted by @xmath355 the similarity of the equations ( [ eq4 - 24a ] ) and ( [ eq4 - 24b ] ) for velocity field to the equations ( [ eq4 - 7a ] ) , ( [ eq4 - 7b ] ) for density field is obvious . we can easily see the skewness parameters for the velocity field are obtained by similar equations as ( [ eq4 - 14a])([eq4 - 14c ] ) : @xmath356 , \label{eq4 - 26a}\\ & & s^{(1)}(r ) = - \frac{3}{2 { g_f } } \left [ \frac{5 + 2e_v}{3 } s^{13}_0 - \frac{9 + e_v}{5 } s^{22}_1 - s^{04}_1 + \frac{2(2-e_v)}{3 } s^{13}_2 - \frac{1-e_v}{5 } s^{22}_3 \right ] , \label{eq4 - 26b}\\ & & s^{(2)}(r ) = - \frac{9}{{g_f } } \left [ \frac{3 + 2e_v}{15 } s^{33}_0 - \frac15 s^{24}_1 - \frac{3 + 4e_v}{21 } s^{33}_2 + \frac15 s^{24}_3 - \frac{2(1-e_v)}{35 } s^{33}_4 \right ] , \label{eq4 - 26c}\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath357 is given by equation ( [ eq4 - 13 ] ) without any modification . in table [ tab4 ] , we show the values of skewness parameters of the velocity field for the cdm - like models for several values of @xmath277 . c|cccccccc @xmath277 & @xmath278 & @xmath279 & @xmath280 & @xmath281 & @xmath282 & @xmath283 + @xmath358 & @xmath359 & @xmath360 & @xmath361 & @xmath362 & @xmath363 & @xmath364 + @xmath365 & @xmath366 & @xmath367 & @xmath368 & @xmath369 & @xmath370 & @xmath371 + @xmath372 & @xmath373 & @xmath374 & @xmath375 & @xmath376 & @xmath377 & @xmath378 + in this table , the value of @xmath351 is set as @xmath379 . for the power spectrum of the power - law form , @xmath380 , \label{eq4 - 27a}\\ & & s^{(2)}({{n_{\rm s } } } ) = -\frac{3}{{g_f } } \left [ f\left(\frac{{{n_{\rm s}}}+5}{2},\frac{{{n_{\rm s}}}+5}{2},\frac52;\frac14\right ) - \frac15 ( { { n_{\rm s}}}+ 4 - 4e_v ) f\left(\frac{{{n_{\rm s}}}+5}{2},\frac{{{n_{\rm s}}}+5}{2},\frac72;\frac14\right ) \right ] . \label{eq4 - 28c}\end{aligned}\ ] ] several numerical values are shown in table [ tab5 ] , where @xmath381 is assumed . c|ccccccccc @xmath314 & @xmath315 & @xmath316 & @xmath317 & @xmath318 & @xmath319 & @xmath320 & @xmath321 & @xmath322 & @xmath278 + @xmath382 & @xmath327 & @xmath383 & @xmath384 & @xmath385 & @xmath386 & @xmath387 & @xmath388 & @xmath389 & @xmath390 + @xmath372 & @xmath391 & @xmath392 & @xmath393 & @xmath394 & @xmath395 & @xmath396 & @xmath397 & @xmath398 & @xmath399 + the projection of the density field @xmath400 defines the 2d cosmic fields on the sky ( @xmath70 ) . here , we derive the skewness parameters for this field . the 2d projected density field with top - hat kernel is investigated by @xcite . here , we are interested in gaussian kernel for our purpose . in a friedman - lematre universe , the comoving angular diameter distance at a comoving distance @xmath401 is given by @xmath402 depending on the sign of the spatial curvature @xmath403 . thus , in spherical coordinates , projected density field in 2d is given by @xmath404 where @xmath405 is the selection function without volume factor , normalized as @xmath406 , and @xmath407 is the 3d comoving density field constant . ] . the present value of the conformal time @xmath408 is @xmath409 . the projected density contrast is defined by @xmath410 , where one can see @xmath411 . we identify the projected density contrast with the 2d ( @xmath70 ) field @xmath9 . since the smoothing angle @xmath412 is much smaller than @xmath413 in most of the interested cases , we consider the small patch of the sky of the vicinity of the polar axis , @xmath414 . with this approximation , we introduce the variables @xmath415 , and @xmath416 , which are considered as 2d euclidean coordinates , @xmath417 . therefore , the projection equation is given by @xmath418 where @xmath419 is the density contrast at comoving coordinates @xmath8 and conformal time @xmath420 . the power spectrum and the bispectrum for the above projected field are given by the limber s equations ( [ eqa2 - 2 ] ) and ( [ eqa2 - 7 ] ) in appendix [ app2 ] , with @xmath421 : @xmath422 where @xmath244 , @xmath245 are 2d projected power spectrum and bispectrum , respectively , of the field @xmath9 , and @xmath423 , @xmath424 are 3d power spectrum and bispectrum , respectively . the 3d power spectrum and the 3d bispectrum are evaluated by the second order perturbation theory . they are similar to equations ( [ eq4 - 7a ] ) and ( [ eq4 - 7b ] ) , but we have to take into account the time - dependence here . they are given by @xmath425 { p_{\rm lin}}(k_1 ) { p_{\rm lin}}(k_2 ) \nonumber\\ & & \qquad\qquad\qquad\qquad\qquad\quad + \ , { \rm cyc.(1,2,3 ) } , \label{eq4 - 34b}\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath426 is the linear growth factor at conformal lookback time @xmath401 , ( i.e. , at conformal time @xmath427 ) , which is normalized as @xmath428 . the following fitting formula @xcite is useful : @xmath429 where @xmath353 and @xmath354 are time - dependent cosmological parameters at conformal lookback time @xmath401 . the variable @xmath430 is a weak function of time and cosmology , and for einstein - de sitter universe , @xmath251 . this quantity @xmath201 is the same we used in 3d density field , but here we also take into account the time - dependence . it is accurately approximated by @xmath431 the variance parameters of the smoohted projected field are given by @xmath432 , \label{eq4 - 36}\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath433 the skewness parameters of the smoothed projected field are given by @xmath434 { \sigma_1}^{2a}\left[s_k(\chi){{\theta_{\rm f}}}\right ] c^{(a)}\left[s_k(\chi){{\theta_{\rm f}}}\right ] , \label{eq4 - 38}\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath435 and @xmath436 \frac{w\left(\sqrt{l_1^{\,2 } + l_2^{\,2 } + 2 l_1 l_2 \mu } \right ) } { w(l_1 ) w(l_2 ) } \nonumber\\ & & \qquad\qquad\quad \times\ , \left\ { \begin{array}{ll } \displaystyle 2 , & a=0,\\ { l_1}^2 + { l_2}^2 + l_1 l_2 \mu , & a=1,\\ 4\ , { l_1}^2 { l_2}^2 \left ( 1 - \mu^2 \right ) , & a=2 , \end{array } \right . \label{eq4 - 40}\end{aligned}\ ] ] so far the smoothing function is arbitrary . for a general smoothing function , the above equations can be numerically integrated to obtain the skewness parameters for each model of the power spectrum . in the following , we adopt the gaussian smoothing function , @xmath437 . for this smoothing function , the equation ( [ eq4 - 10 ] ) holds even for this 2d case . in this case , the following integral representation of the modified bessel function @xmath265 for @xmath438 is useful : @xmath439 actually , the derivatives of the above equation , @xmath440 are sufficient to perform the angular integration in equation ( [ eq4 - 40 ] ) . moreover , one can use the property of the bessel function , @xmath441 , and @xmath442 to obtain formulas , @xmath443 from these formulas , equation ( [ eq4 - 40 ] ) reduce to @xmath444 , \label{eq4 - 45a}\\ & & \widetilde{c}^{(1 ) } = \frac34 \left\ { ( 4+e ) ( l_1^{\,2 } + l_2^{\,2 } ) i_0(l_1 l_2 ) - \left [ \frac{15 + e}{2 } l_1 l_2 + 2 \left ( \frac{l_1^{\,3}}{l_2 } + \frac{l_2^{\,3}}{l_1 } \right ) \right ] i_1(l_1 l_2 ) \right . \nonumber\\ & & \qquad\qquad\qquad \left . + \ ; ( 2-e ) ( l_1^{\,2 } + l_2^{\,2 } ) i_2(l_1 l_2 ) - \frac{1 - e}{2 } l_1 l_2 i_3(l_1 l_2 ) \right\ } , \label{eq4 - 45b}\\ & & \widetilde{c}^{(2 ) } = \frac34 \left [ ( 5 + 3e ) l_1^{\,2 } l_2^{\,2 } i_0(l_1 l_2 ) - 2 l_1 l_2(l_1^{\,2 } + l_2^{\,2 } ) i_1(l_1 l_2 ) - 4(1+e ) l_1^{\,2 } l_2^{\,2 } i_2(l_1 l_2 ) \right . \nonumber\\ & & \qquad\qquad \left . + \ ; 2 l_1 l_2 ( l_1^{\,2 } + l_2^{\,2 } ) i_3(l_1 l_2 ) - ( 1-e ) l_1^{\,2 } l_2^{\,2 } i_4(l_1 l_2 ) \right ] . \label{eq4 - 45c}\end{aligned}\ ] ] at this point , defining @xmath445 the equation ( [ eq4 - 39 ] ) reduces to @xmath446 , \label{eq4 - 47a}\\ & & c^{(1 ) } = \frac34 \left [ 2(4+e ) c^{13}_0 - \frac{15 + e}{2 } c^{22}_1 - 4 c^{04}_1 + 2(2-e ) c^{13}_2 - \frac{1 - e}{2 } c^{22}_3 \right ] , \label{eq4 - 47b}\\ & & c^{(2 ) } = \frac34 \left [ ( 5 + 3e ) c^{33}_0 - 4 c^{24}_1 - 4(1 + e ) c^{33}_2 + 4c^{24}_3 - ( 1 - e ) c^{33}_4 \right ] . \label{eq4 - 47c}\end{aligned}\ ] ] the two - dimensional integration of equation ( [ eq4 - 46 ] ) is performed only once as a function of @xmath2 . the result is stored as a table , and is used in one - dimensional numerical integration of equation ( [ eq4 - 38 ] ) for finally obtaining the skewness parameters in 2d projected density fields . functions @xmath447 for cdm - like models are given in table [ tab6 ] which are functions of @xmath448 . c|cccccccccccc @xmath277 & @xmath449 & @xmath322 & @xmath278 & @xmath279 & @xmath280 & @xmath281 & @xmath282 & @xmath283 & @xmath450 + @xmath451 & @xmath452 & @xmath453 & @xmath454 & @xmath455 & @xmath456 & @xmath457 & @xmath458 & @xmath459 & @xmath460 + @xmath461 & @xmath462 & @xmath463 & @xmath464 & @xmath465 & @xmath466 & @xmath467 & @xmath468 & @xmath469 & @xmath470 + @xmath471 & @xmath472 & @xmath473 & @xmath474 & @xmath475 & @xmath476 & @xmath477 & @xmath478 & @xmath479 & @xmath480 + when the 3d power spectrum is given by a power - law form of equation ( [ eq4 - 16 ] ) , the integration by wave length @xmath139 , @xmath140 can be analytically performed as in the 3d case . in fact , the parameter @xmath481 of equation ( [ eq4 - 37 ] ) with gaussian smoothing @xmath482 is given by @xmath483 and the variance parameters are given by @xmath484 with similar technique used in 3d density field , @xmath485 the equations ( [ eq4 - 47a])([eq4 - 47c ] ) and the above equation finally give the values of @xmath447 . the recursion relations of equations ( [ eq4 - 21a ] ) and ( [ eq4 - 21b ] ) simplify the result : @xmath486 these functions are independent on scale @xmath2 in the power - law case , but dependent on power - law index , @xmath311 . again , @xmath487 and @xmath488 are identical only in the power - law case . numerical values are given in table [ tab7 ] , where @xmath489 is assumed . c|ccccccccc @xmath311 & @xmath315 & @xmath316 & @xmath317 & @xmath318 & @xmath319 & @xmath320 & @xmath321 & @xmath322 & @xmath278 + @xmath490 & @xmath491 & @xmath492 & @xmath493 & @xmath494 & @xmath495 & @xmath496 & @xmath497 & @xmath498 & @xmath499 + @xmath471 & @xmath500 & @xmath501 & @xmath502 & @xmath503 & @xmath504 & @xmath505 & @xmath506 & @xmath475 & @xmath507 + for the power - law case , the skewness parameters of equation ( [ eq4 - 38 ] ) reduces to the following simple form : @xmath508^{2 - 2{{n_{\rm s } } } } n^3(\chi ) d^4(\chi ) } { \displaystyle \left\ { \int d\chi \left[s_k(\chi)\right]^{2-{{n_{\rm s } } } } n^2(\chi ) d^2(\chi ) \right\}^2}\ , c^{(a)}({{n_{\rm s } } } ) . \label{4 - 50 - 2}\end{aligned}\ ] ] it is interesting to compare the results with those of top - hat smoothing . according to @xcite , the top - hat smoothing gives @xmath509 for power - law case . comparing this expression with our table [ tab7 ] , they roughly agree with each other , and have similar behavior with spectral index . in detail , the gaussian smoothing gives more or less larger values . for example , top - hat smoothing gives @xmath510 for @xmath511 , respectively , while gaussian smoothing gives @xmath512 , respectively . it is reasonable that the @xmath451 of top - hat smoothing differs from that of gaussian smoothing for large spectral index , because the top - hat smoothing gathers more power on small scales than gaussian smoothing . the local convergence field of the weak lensing is commonly used for studying the large - scale structure of the universe ( e.g. , * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? assuming the situation where limber s equation ( see appendix [ app2 ] ) and also the born approximation @xcite hold , the following correspondence between the convergence field @xmath513 and the 3d density contrast @xmath514 is useful ( e.g. , * ? ? ? * ) : @xmath515 , \label{eq4 - 60}\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath516 is the scale factor at conformal lookback time @xmath517 . the above equation is reduced to exactly the same form as the projected field of equation ( [ eq4 - 31 ] ) , but with the substitution , @xmath518 however , one should note that this substitution is valid only under the assumption of the born approximation . although the effect of the born approximation on the skewness is known to be weak @xcite , the validity of the born approximation in general situation has not been tested in detail @xcite . there is some subtlety which could arise when various combinations of skewness are considered . the above expressions of the skewness parameters are for unbiased fields . the skewness parameters for biased fields are non - trivial . they depend on the details of the biasing scheme in the real universe which is poorly known so far . however , the skewness parameters are well - defined quantities , so that they are calculated from the first principle once the biasing scheme is given . perhaps , one of the simplest , yet non - trivial case is the local , deterministic biasing . in this case , we can follow @xcite to obtain the perturbative expansion of the biasing : @xmath519 where @xmath520 and @xmath97 are the galaxy and mass density contrast , respectively . the spatial dimension is arbitrary , so that @xmath520 , @xmath97 can be functions in either 1d , 2d , or 3d space . the biased variance in lowest order is given by @xmath521 it is also straightforward to calculate skewness parameters . after some algebra , all skewness parameters are shown to transform in a same way : @xmath522 irrespective of spatial dimensions , @xmath6 , and of kinds of skewness parameters , @xmath523 . in this framework , the parameters @xmath524 and @xmath525 are needed . a possible way to determine these parameters is to measure the variance @xmath526 and the skewness @xmath527 from the observation . theoretical models predict the variance @xmath528 and the skewness @xmath529 of the mass distribution . we obtain biasing parameters by @xmath530 and @xmath531 . the derivatives of the skewness , @xmath532 , @xmath533 , are then obtained from equation ( [ eq4 - 71 ] ) . in case of level - crossing , and genus statistics as functions of scaled threshold @xmath224 , the second - order corrections in equation ( [ eq2 - 207a])([eq2 - 207c ] ) only depends on the difference of the skewness parameters times the variace . quite remarkably , this type of second - order correction term does not depend on bias parameter at all : @xmath534 \sigma_{\rm 0,g } = \left[s^{(a ) } - s^{(0)}\right ] \sigma_{\rm 0 } \label{eq4 - 72}\end{aligned}\ ] ] thus , the second - order nonlinear corrections for level - crossing and genus statistics of locally biased field are exactly the same as that of unbiased mass density field . this can be considered as an advantage of the scaled threshold @xmath224 in these statistics , because the biasing is one of the most embarrasing uncertainty in the analysis of galaxy distribution . however , one should note this result is derived under the local biasing scheme . so far the locality of the bias is not guaranteed in general . stochastic argument @xcite of the biasing is more complicated for derivative skewness @xmath129 and @xmath234 than for usual skewness @xmath88 , because they involve the correlation between field derivatives . the phenomenological nature of the stochastic biasing requires many parameters which is not calculable from first principles . therefore , the stochastic biasing sheme does not effectively work for our problem . more physical treatment of the biasing schemes of galaxy formation is needed , in which case the nonlocality of the bias could also be important @xcite . the perturbative calculations offer valuable aspects of weakly non - linear evolution of the various statistics without laborious parameter survey by numerical simulations . in this paper , we obtain the lowest nonlinear corrections to relatively popular statistics of smoothed cosmic fields . using these results , it is interesting to see how the weakly nonlinear effect tends to distort the gaussian prediction for those exemplified statistics . in figure [ fig1 ] , various statistics for 3d density field is shown . the amplitude of each statistic is appropriately normalized as we are interested in the deviation from the gaussian prediction . if we neglect the normalization , minkowski functionals of @xmath217 are equivalent to the statistics @xmath105 , @xmath130 , and @xmath149 , respectively , so that they degenerate in this figure ( we should note the sign of @xmath535 is inverted ) . the rms @xmath49 , which is considered as a weakly nonlinear parameter , is set @xmath536 . a limit @xmath537 corresponds to the prediction of the linear theory , which is given by thin solid lines in the figure . this linear prediction is equivalent to the gaussian fluctuations , because we assume the initial density field is random gaussian . in general , the curves of statistics plotted against the direct density threshold , @xmath133 ( dotted lines ) , exhibit considerable deviations from gaussian predictions . the overall tendency does not depend much on the shape of the spectrum we consider here , i.e. , power - law spectrum with index @xmath165 , @xmath211 , @xmath119 , and cdm model with smoothing length @xmath538 , where @xmath276 is the shape parameter of the cdm spectrum . they are consistent with the so - called meat - ball shift , which means that there are more isolated regions in a nonlinear field than in a gaussian field for a fixed threshold . in fact , @xmath105 , @xmath130 , @xmath539 of high value of threshold , e.g. , @xmath540 , virtually correspond to the number of isolated regions , and each figure shows that the number is indeed increased by weakly nonlinear evolution . the weakly nonlinear formula for the genus curve against the density threshold , @xmath541 , which was first derived by @xcite has been compared with numerical simulations in literatures . @xcite shows the good agreement of the analytic prediction with the simulations for various spectra . @xcite compared the prediction of the genus curve against direct @xmath133 with the simulated sdss data . unfortunately , in their published paper , they have transcribing errors , which incorrectly made the perturbation theory considerably disagree with their data . there are also ambiguity in their comparison on biasing which alter the values of skewness parameters . one can guess the biasing effect on skewness parameters by equation ( [ eq4 - 70 ] ) . they chose the peak particles as galaxies , and the linear biasing parameter is inferred as @xmath542 , but the nonlinear parameter @xmath525 is not obvious in their work . some literatures indicate the skewness @xmath88 of peaks are roughly given by 12 @xcite but for highly biased peaks @xmath543 . if we adopt @xmath544 , the skewness is given by @xmath545 which is not unreasonable . if it is the case for their simulation , the perturbative prediction and their data completely agree with each other . the @xmath546-value per degrees of freedom reduces to only 1.03 ( private communication with w. n. colley & d. h. weinberg ) . obviously , we have to further investigate the biasing effects in numerical simulations to obtain a conclusive result . most of the topological analyses of the previous work use the scaled threshold @xmath224 . the dashed lines in fig . [ fig1 ] shows the corresponding curves . the deviations from the linear theory is dramatically reduced . this fact is empirically known by the analyses of numerical simulations @xcite . the reason for this reduction is mathematically due to the closeness of the values of skewness parameters @xmath87 , ( @xmath523 ) , since all the terms of the nonlinear corrections in equations ( [ eq2 - 207a])([eq2 - 207c ] ) depend only on @xmath239 ( @xmath547 ) . for the hierarchical model of equation ( [ eq4 - 1 ] ) , they are exactly zero , that means there is not any ( second order ) nonlinear correction for the hierarchical model . since the hierarchical model is known to roughly approximate the nonlinear evolution , it is not surprising that more realistic fields have only small corrections of nonlinearity if they are plotted against the volume - fraction threshold , @xmath224 . for power - law models , @xmath88 and @xmath129 are exactly the same . that makes the nonlinear correction for @xmath105 or @xmath548 exactly vanishes . thus , the nonlinear corrections for other statistics are arisen by the difference between @xmath88 and @xmath234 . for the cdm model , there still is a difference between @xmath88 and @xmath129 , but it is relatively small as seen from the table [ tab2 ] . as for the topological statistics , @xmath130 , @xmath149 , @xmath549 and @xmath535 , deviations of curves against @xmath224 from the linear theory prediction depend on the underlying spectrum through differences of skewness parameters . the weakly nonlinear effect for redder spectrum of @xmath550 induces a sponge - like shift , that means the number of holes in isolated regions increases . on the other hand , the bluer spectrum of @xmath551 indicates a meat - ball shift . these tendencies are qualitatively in agreement with the numerical results ( e.g. * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? it is not trivial to estimate errors expected in observationally estimating statistics of smoothed cosmic fields . the observational errors mainly consists of the shot noise and the cosmic variace . the systematic comparison with simulations should be used for the error estimates . unfortunately , previous earlier simulations does not have enough resolution to be quantitatively compared in weakly nonlinear regime . @xcite use much larger simulations than those earlier work , and gives the genus curve in weakly nonlinear regime in their fig . 9 . relative depths of left and right troughs in the genus curve show slightly meat - ball shift , which is consistent with our prediction . although their variation of smoothing length is rather limited , their plots ensures the slight meat - ball shift predicted by the perturbation theory can definitely be observed . @xcite plot the 2d genus curve , but they use the thin slice which suffers strongly nonlinear effects so that the quantitative comparison is not appropriate with weakly nonlinear results . they report the meat - ball shift in 2d genus , which is the same direction of the weakly nonlinear correction besides amplitude . we find there is stll neccesity of proper , systematic comparison between the perturbation theory and numerical simulations in weakly nonlinear regime . the decisive factor between sponge - like shift and meat - ball shift is the sign and amplitude of @xmath552 , since @xmath553 is exactly or approximately zero for wide range of models like power - law , or cdm - like models . if the factor @xmath552 is positive , the meat - ball shift takes place . if this factor is negative , the sponge - like shift occurs . for power - law case , that factor is positive for @xmath554 , and is negative for @xmath555 . the amplitude of this factor times the amplitude of the nonlinearity parameter , @xmath556 determines the amplitude of the meat - ball shift in the genus curve . prominent shifts are seen around the two troughs of the genus curve at @xmath557 . at these troughs , the factor @xmath553 does not contribute to the genus curve since the accompanying factor @xmath558 vanishes . therefore , one can almost completely characterize the shifts by a factor @xmath559 , which we call the genus asymmetry parameter , around the troughs . we propose this genus asymmetry parameter as a theory - motivated parameter of the genus asymmetry . this factor is observationally determined by fitting the shape of the genus curve by a form , @xmath560 where @xmath245 is the genus asymmetry parameter . in this fitting , @xmath561 is much smaller if the non - gaussian features are from purely gravitational evolution of the initial gaussian field , and if the power spectrum is smooth enough as cdm models . the genus asymmetry parameter for cdm models with shape parameter @xmath276 , normalized by @xmath562 is listed for various smoothing length in table [ tab8 ] . cccccccccc @xmath563 & ... & @xmath564 & @xmath565 & @xmath566 & @xmath567 & @xmath568 & @xmath569 & @xmath570 & @xmath571 + @xmath572 & ... & @xmath573 & @xmath574 & @xmath575 & @xmath576 & @xmath577 & @xmath578 & @xmath579 & @xmath580 + @xmath581 & ... & @xmath582 & @xmath583 & @xmath584 & @xmath585 & @xmath586 & @xmath587 & @xmath588 & @xmath589 + @xmath590 & ... & @xmath591 & @xmath592 & @xmath593 & @xmath594 & @xmath595 & @xmath586 & @xmath596 & @xmath597 + @xmath322 & ... & @xmath598 & @xmath599 & @xmath600 & @xmath601 & @xmath602 & @xmath603 & @xmath604 & @xmath597 + since the factor @xmath552 increase with the spectral index , as seen from table [ tab3 ] , this factor also increase with the smoothing length for cdm model on scales of interest . on the other hand , the factor @xmath49 is a decreasing function of the smoothing length . as a result , the genus asymmetry parameter is not a monotonic function of the smoothing length . for example , the genus asymmetry parameter in the @xmath605 , @xmath606 cdm model is approximately @xmath607 on wide range of smoothing length of @xmath608 . from the second order formula for the genus of equation ( [ eq2 - 207c ] ) , the genus at the troughs is proportional to @xmath609 . therefore , the fraction of the deviation from the gaussian prediction at @xmath557 is @xmath610 . when the genus asymmetry parameter is @xmath607 , this fraction is about @xmath611 . thus , the perturbation theory predicts that the values of genus at positive and negative troughs differ @xmath612 for the @xmath613 , @xmath606 cdm model , and so on . this difference increases with the shape parameter @xmath276 . the degree of deviation is qualitatively consistent with the numerical result in fig . 9 of @xcite , although quantitative comparison is still difficult because of the noise in the simulation . the statistics for the velocity field is plotted in figure [ fig2 ] . since the the sign of the skewness parameters is negative in this case , the weakly nonlinear evolution of statistics against the density threshold @xmath133 indicates the sponge - like shift . in terms of the volume - fraction threshold @xmath224 , on the other hand , meat - ball shifts are observed even for relatively bluer spectrum with @xmath614 . the 2d projected galaxy statistics are dependent on the selection function of galaxies and cosmological models . as an example , we assume the apm luminosity function @xcite for galaxies with b band magnitude limit @xmath615 . the differential number count @xmath616 for this sample is plotted in figure [ fig3 ] . the resulting mean redshift is @xmath617 . the relation between the differential number count and the normalized mean number density @xmath405 in comoving coordinates are given by @xmath618 = \frac{\displaystyle h(z ) \frac{dn}{dz}(z ) } { \displaystyle \left\{s_k\left[\chi(z)\right]\right\}^2 \int_0^\infty \frac{dn}{dz } dz } , \label{eq5 - 1}\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath619 are the hubble parameter and the comoving distance at redshift @xmath71 , respectively . once the selection function @xmath405 is given by equation ( [ eq5 - 1 ] ) , the integration of equations ( [ eq4 - 36])([eq4 - 38 ] ) , and the interpolation of tabulated values of @xmath447 in table [ tab6 ] give the skewness parameters . for power - law power spectra , the skewness parameters are given by the simpler integration of equation ( [ 4 - 50 - 2 ] ) and the values of @xmath447 in table [ tab7 ] . in figure [ fig4 ] , 2-dimensional statistics , @xmath105 , @xmath130 , @xmath620 and @xmath621 are plotted with assumed cosmological parameters , @xmath622 , @xmath623 , and apm luminosity function with limiting magnitude 19 . the nonlinear parameter is assumed as @xmath624 . for the cdm model , the shape parameter is assumed as @xmath625 , and we take the smoothing angle as @xmath626 . with this smoothing angle the value @xmath624 corresponds to the normalization @xmath627 . basic features for these 2-dimensional statistics are the same as for 3-dimensional density field , except that the smoothing scale in cdm model we adopt corresponds to smaller scale than in the example of 3-dimensional density field of the figure [ fig1 ] . in this work , we comprehensively presented a basic formalism to treat the statistics of smoothed cosmic fields in perturbation theory . this formalism provides a methodology on evaluating how various statistics deviate from the prediction of simple random gaussian fields . as long as the non - gaussianity is weak , the behavior of the statistics caused by non - gaussianity is predicted by our formalism , which enable us to quantitatively compare the statistical quantities and the source of the non - gaussianity . this method is considered as an extension of the edgeworth expansion , which has been proven to be useful in various fields of research , as long as the non - gaussianity is weak . in this paper , we derive useful formulas and relations focusing on application of the second - order perturbation theory to various cosmic fields . several examples of statistics of cosmic fields in second - order perturbation theory are investigated in datail , including level - crossing statistics , 2d and 3d genus statistics , 2d extrema statistics , and the minkowski functionals , which are extensively used in cosmology . more complicated statistics , such as 2d and 3d density peaks , can also be calculated , although they are more tedius . a particular interest in cosmology of our method is in the application to the cosmic fields . even if the cosmic field was random gaussian at the initial stage , the gravitational evolution induces the non - gaussianity . the gravitational instability is a well - defined process , so that we can evaluate the non - gaussianity without any ambiguity when the evolution remains in the quasi - linear regime provided that the biasing from the non - gravitational process is simple enough on large scales . therefore , we performed the perturbative analysis to obtain the necessary skewness parameters based on the gravitational instability theory . we considered the 3d density field , the 3d velocity field , the 2d projected density field . in the application of second order theory to various statistics of smoothed cosmic fields , three types of skewness parameters are commonly useful , i.e. , @xmath88 , @xmath129 , an @xmath234 . extensive calculations of these parameters for various cosmic fields are one of the new results of this paper . it would be true that other skewness parameters are needed when other complex statistics are considered . such other parameters , if needed , are similarly calculated by the method we outlined in this paper . we find the lowest order deviations from the gaussian predictions of various statistics of smoothed cosmic fields depend only on the differences of the skewness parameters when we use a threshold @xmath224 , which is rescaled by a volume - fraction of the smoothed field . this rescaling makes the lowest deviations much smaller than in the case of direct threshold @xmath133 . this is because three skewness parameters @xmath87 take similar values if it is arisen from the gravitational evolution . for the phenomenological hierarchical model , these parameters are identical . in this case , the weakly nonlinear correction of the statistical quantities in terms of the volume - fraction threshold vanishes . when evaluated by the second - order perturbation theory of density fluctuations , those three types of skewness parameter are still close to each other this fact explains the smallness of the deviations from gaussian predictions of statistical quantities like genus , level - crossing , or minkowski functionals when the rescaled threshold by volume - fraction is used . we discussed small , but detectable deviations from gaussian prediction of the 3d genus curve against rescaled threshold in detail . in the framework of the second - order perturbation theory , a prominent deviation of the genus curve occurs at the two troughs of the curve . relative depths of left and right troughs in the genus curve show slightly meat - ball shift for cdm - like models . we found the degree of this asymmetry is proportional to the combination @xmath559 . we call this factor as a genus asymmetry parameter , which we propose as theory - motivated parameter that characterize the asymmetry of the genus curve . the genus asymmetry parameter can observationally be obtained by fitting the genus curve by hermite polynomials as equation ( [ eq5 - 0 ] ) . qualitative comparison with the numerical simulations in literatures suggests that such asymmetry can actually be observable . we have not estimated over what dynamic range in nonlinearity parameter like @xmath49 , @xmath628 , or @xmath629 are each perturbative expressions valid . this estimation requires a systematic comparison with large n - body simulations , which is beyond the scope of this paper , and will be given in a subsequent paper of the series . in principle , any order in the perturbation theory can be calculated as further as one would like . although the computation of the higher - order theory becomes more and more tedious , the necessity of the comparison with large - scale cosmological observations is a good reason to perform such computation as further as we can . one of the spectacular example of the detailed comparison between perturbation theory and observations is the fine structure constant in quantum electrodynamics ( e.g. , * ? ? ? our analysis in this paper will be extended to the third - order perturbation theory in a subsequent paper of the series . the present time is in an unique decade when the observations of cosmic fields are in unforeseen progress , like large - scale redshift surveys , detailed mapping of cmb fluctuations , gravitational lensing surveys , and so forth . statistics of smoothed density field with higher - order perturbation theory will provide an unique method to analyze those high - precision data . the precision cosmology is undoubtedly providing clues to unlock the door to the origin of the universe . i would like to thank m. kerscher and b. jain for discussions . i wish to acknowledge support from jsps postdoctoral fellowships for research abroad , and from the ministry of education , culture , sports , science , and technology , grant - in - aid for encouragement of young scientists , 13740150 , 2001 . in this appendix , we give gaussian integrals which are useful in this paper . in the following , @xmath630 is the hermite polynomials , @xmath631 and we further employ the notation @xmath632 several hermite polynomials are @xmath633 the hermite polynomial at zero is given by @xmath634 we generalize the above definition of @xmath635 to the case @xmath636 by interpreting @xmath637 as the appropriate gamma function so that @xmath638 , @xmath639 , etc . for example , @xmath640 , @xmath641 , @xmath642 , @xmath643 , and so forth . in this appendix , we give useful gaussian averages @xmath644 of equation ( [ eq1 - 12 - 1 ] ) for normalized cosmic field @xmath18 defined by equation ( [ eq1 - 3 ] ) and its spatial derivatives @xmath645 . in the following , @xmath646 represents any one of the components @xmath78 . first , concerning @xmath18 , @xmath647 second , concerning @xmath646 , in the notation of equation ( [ eqa1 - 3 ] ) , @xmath648 the correlation functions on projected sky is expressible by the 3-dimensional correlation functions . the explicit relation for the two - point correlation function is given by limber s equation @xcite . the fourier - space version of limber s equation is given by kaiser @xcite and is somewhat simpler . his argument was generalized to higher - order correlation functions and their fourier transforms @xcite . since the higher - order limber s equation in fourier space was discussed in the context of weak lensing field in literatures , here we review the derivation in a way more useful in this paper . let 2d projected field @xmath9 be the projection of a time - dependent 3d field @xmath649 along a light - cone : @xmath650 where @xmath651 is some radial weighting function and @xmath401 is the radial comoving distance , and @xmath409 is the conformal time at the observer . the past light - cone of the observer is specified by the equation @xmath652 . the comoving angular distance @xmath653 is defined by equation ( [ eq4 - 29 ] ) . in the following , we explicitly derive the relation for 3-point correlation function , and bispectrum . from the limber s equation , power spectrum is already derived by @xcite : @xmath654 where @xmath655 and @xmath656 is the power spectrum of fields @xmath9 and @xmath55 , respectively . we generalize this equation to the one for 3-point statistics below . the generalization of the following derivation to higher - order statistics is straightforward . the angular 3-point correlation function @xmath657 of @xmath9 is @xmath658 where @xmath659 is the spatial 3-point correlation function of the field @xmath55 with the 3-point configuration @xmath660 at conformal time @xmath420 . according to the spirit of the limber s equation , we assume that @xmath661 is slowly varying compared to the scale of the fluctuations of interest and also that these fluctuations occur on a scale much smaller than the curvature scale . the equation ( [ eqa2 - 3 ] ) is the generalization of the limber s equation to higher - order correlation functions . now we transform equation ( [ eq2 - 13 ] ) to obtain the 2d bispectrum . we use the following convention of the fourier transforms @xmath662 the bispectrum @xmath663 of the 2d field @xmath9 , and @xmath664 of the 3d field @xmath55 are defined by @xmath665 where @xmath666 and @xmath667 . the dirac s delta function comes from the translational invariance of statistics . from the relations , @xmath668 the fourier transform of the equation ( [ eqa2 - 3 ] ) reduces to a simple equation , @xmath669 this is a bispectrum version of the limber s equation and the generalization of the kaiser s equation for power spectrum ( [ eqa2 - 2 ] ) . in table [ tab9 ] , the quantites used in this paper are listed . ccc @xmath670 & ensemble average & ( [ eq1 - 12a ] ) + @xmath644 & ensemble average by gaussian field & ( [ eq1 - 12 - 1 ] ) + @xmath481 & 2d spectral parameter & ( [ eq4 - 36 ] ) + @xmath353 & time - dependent density parameter & ( [ eq4 - 34 - 1 ] ) + @xmath252 & density parameter & ( [ eq4 - 34 - 1 ] ) + @xmath18 & normalized field of @xmath9 & ( [ eq1 - 3 ] ) + @xmath671 , etc . & @xmath672 , etc . & ( [ eq1 - 4 ] ) + @xmath673 & spectral parameter & ( [ eq1 - 13 - 5 ] ) + @xmath97 & mass density contrast & ( [ eq4 - 70 ] ) + @xmath674 & 3d density contrast & ( [ eq4 - 31 ] ) + @xmath520 & galaxy number density contrast & ( [ eq4 - 70 ] ) + @xmath62 & @xmath675 , tensor notation & + @xmath64 & linear combination of @xmath18 and @xmath62 & ( [ eq1 - 13 - 3 - 1 ] ) + @xmath78 & @xmath676 , vector notation & + @xmath417 & angular coordinates in a small patch of the sky & ( [ eq4 - 31 ] ) + @xmath513 & local convergence field & ( [ eq4 - 60 ] ) + @xmath354 & time - dependent scaled cosmological constant & ( [ eq4 - 34 - 1 ] ) + @xmath253 & scaled cosmological constant & ( [ eq4 - 34 - 1 ] ) + @xmath133 & threshold by variance & + @xmath677 & threshold by volume fraction & ( [ eq2 - 105 ] ) + @xmath241 & 3d comoving density field & ( [ eq4 - 30 ] ) + @xmath678 & 2d weighted extrema & ( [ eq2 - 24 ] ) + @xmath400 & 2d projected density field & ( [ eq4 - 30 ] ) + @xmath49 & variance of @xmath9 & ( [ eq1 - 2 ] ) + @xmath271 , @xmath679 & spectral parameters & ( [ eq1 - 13 - 3a ] ) , ( [ eq1 - 13 - 3b ] ) + @xmath409 & conformal time at the present & ( [ eq4 - 30 ] ) + @xmath401 & comoving distance & ( [ eq4 - 29 ] ) + @xmath680 & volume of the unit ball in @xmath121 dimensions & ( [ eq2 - 54 ] ) + @xmath681 & vector of spatial derivatives of @xmath18 & ( [ eq1 - 4 ] ) + @xmath682 & bispectrum at the present time & ( [ eq4 - 4b ] ) + @xmath683 & 2d bispectrum & ( [ eq4 - 33b ] ) + @xmath684 & 3d bispectrum at conformal time @xmath420 & ( [ eq4 - 33b ] ) + @xmath685 & integrand of the 2d skewness parameters & ( [ eq4 - 39 ] ) + @xmath686 & integrand of the 2d skewness parameters & ( [ eq4 - 40 ] ) + @xmath687 & contributions to the 2d skewness parameters & ( [ eq4 - 46 ] ) + @xmath349 & linear growth rate & ( [ eq4 - 34a ] ) + @xmath201 & parameter of the perturbation theory & ( [ eq2 - 21 - 1 ] ) + @xmath351 & parameter of the perturbation theory & ( [ eq4 - 24b ] ) + @xmath55 & cosmic field , in general & ( [ eq1 - 12a ] ) + @xmath688 , etc . & @xmath689 , etc . & ( [ eq1 - 13 ] ) + @xmath690 & gauss hypergeometric function @xmath691 & ( [ eq4 - 20 ] ) + @xmath130 & 2d genus statistic & ( [ eq2 - 8 ] ) , ( [ eq2 - 9 ] ) + @xmath149 & 3d genus statistic & ( [ eq2 - 15 ] ) , ( [ eq2 - 17 ] ) + @xmath343 & time - dependent hubble parameter & ( [ eq4 - 23 ] ) + @xmath692 & hubble constant & ( [ eq5 - 2 ] ) + @xmath693 & modified bessel function & ( [ eq4 - 11 ] ) + @xmath694 & fourier counterpart of @xmath25 & ( [ eq1 - 5 ] ) + @xmath695 & integers defined by table [ tab1 ] & ( [ eq2 - 19 ] ) + @xmath183 & spatial curvature & ( [ eq4 - 29 ] ) + @xmath696 & hermite polynomials & ( [ eqa1 - 1 ] ) + @xmath697 & extended hermite polynomial of order @xmath211 & ( [ eqa1 - 2 ] ) + @xmath698 & @xmath314-th order cumulants of @xmath25 & ( [ eq1 - 6])([eq1 - 7d ] ) + @xmath699 & normalized cumulants of @xmath25 & ( [ eq1 - 12 ] ) + @xmath37 & second - order cumulant of @xmath25 & ( [ eq1 - 8 ] ) + @xmath105 & level - crossing statistic & ( [ eq2 - 1a ] ) + @xmath106 & length statistic & ( [ eq2 - 1b ] ) + @xmath107 & area statistic & ( [ eq2 - 1c ] ) + @xmath700 & multivariate gaussian distribution function & ( [ eq1 - 5 ] ) + @xmath244 & multivariate probablitiy distribution function & ( [ eq1 - 5 ] ) + @xmath701 & power spectrum at present & ( [ eq4 - 4a ] ) + @xmath702 & 2d power spectrum & ( [ eq4 - 33a ] ) + @xmath703 & 3d power spectrum at conformal time @xmath420 & ( [ eq4 - 33a ] ) + @xmath249 & linear power spectrum & ( [ eq4 - 7a ] ) + @xmath238 & hierarchical amplitude of the 3-point function & ( [ eq4 - 1 ] ) + @xmath87 , @xmath704 & skewness parameters & ( [ eq1 - 15a])([eq1 - 15d ] ) + @xmath705 & integrand of the skewness parameters & ( [ eq4 - 9 ] ) + @xmath706 & contributions to the skewness parameters & ( [ eq4 - 13 ] ) + @xmath707 & galaxy skewness parameters & ( [ eq4 - 29 ] ) + @xmath708 & comoving angular diameter distance & ( [ eq4 - 29 ] ) + @xmath709 & cdm transfer function & ( [ eq4 - 15 ] ) + @xmath181 & minkowski functionals & ( [ eq2 - 50 - 0 ] ) , ( [ eq2 - 50 ] ) , ( [ eq2 - 52 ] ) , ( [ eq2 - 54 ] ) + @xmath710 & smoothing function in real space & ( [ eq1 - 1 ] ) + @xmath10 & smoothing function in real space & ( [ eq1 - 1 ] ) + @xmath711 & generating function & ( [ eq1 - 5 ] ) + @xmath524 & bias parameter & ( [ eq4 - 70 ] ) + @xmath525 & nonlinear bias parameter & ( [ eq4 - 70 ] ) + @xmath6 & dimension of the sample space & ( [ eq1 - 1 ] ) + @xmath712 & differential number count & ( [ eq5 - 1 ] ) + @xmath9 & smoothed cosmic field , in general & ( [ eq1 - 1 ] ) + @xmath225 & volume fraction on the high - density side & ( [ eq2 - 105 ] ) + @xmath347 & logarithmic derivative of the growth factor & ( [ eq4 - 25 ] ) + @xmath125 & hermite polynomial at zero , @xmath713 , extended to @xmath714 & ( [ eqa1 - 3 ] ) + @xmath314 & selection function per unit comoving volume & ( [ eq4 - 30 ] ) + @xmath311 & index for the power - law power spectrum & ( [ eq4 - 16 ] ) + @xmath73 , @xmath74 , @xmath71 & linear combinations of @xmath18 and @xmath62 s & ( [ eq1 - 13 - 4a])([eq1 - 13 - 4c ] ) + adler , r. j. 1981 , r. k. 1986 , the geometry of random fields ( chichester ; wiley ) balian , r. & schaeffer , r. 1989 , , 220 , 1 bardeen , j. m. , bond , j. r. , kaiser , n. , & szalay , a. s. , 1986 , , 304 , 15 bartelmann , m. & schneider , p. 1999 , to be submitted to physics reports ( astro - ph/9912508 ) baugh , c. m. & efstathiou , g. 1994 , , 270 , 183 beaky , m. m. , scherrer , r. j. & villumsen , j. v. 1992 , , 387 , 443 bernardeau , f. 1992 , , 392 , 1 bernardeau , f. 1994a , , 433 , 1 bernardeau , f. 1994b , , 291 , 697 bernardeau , f. 1995 , , 301 , 309 bernardeau , f. , juszkiewicz , r. , dekel , a. & bouchet , f. r. 1995 , , 274 , 20 bernardeau , f. & kofman , l. 1995 , , 443 , 479 bernardeau , f. , van waerbeke , l. & mellier , y. 1997 , , 322 , 1 bernardeau , f. , colombi , s. , gaztanaga , e. , & scoccimarro , r. 2002 , , 367 , 1 bharadwaj , s. , sahni , v. , sathyaprakash , b. s. , shandarin , s. f. , & yess , c. 2000 , , 528 , 21 bond , j. r. & efstathiou , g. 1987 , , 226 , 655 bouchet , f. r. , juszkiewicz , r. , colombi , s. & pellat , r. 1992 , , 394 , l5 buchalter , a. , kamionkowski , m. , & jaffe , a. h. 2000 , , 530 , 36 buchalter , a. & kamionkowski , m. 1999 , , 521 , 1 canavezes , a. et al . 1998 , , 297 , 777 carroll , s. m. , press , w. h. & turner , e. l. 1992 , , 30 , 499 cayon , l. & smoot , g. 1995 , , 452 , 487 cen , r. 1998 , , 509 , 494 chodorowski , m. j. & lokas , e. l. 1997 , , 287 , 591 coles , p. 1988 , , 234 , 509 coles , p. 1990 , , 243 , 171 coles , p. & barrow , j. d. 1987 , , 228 , 407 coles , p. & plionis , m. 1991 , , 250 , 75 coles , p. , moscardini , l. , plionis , m. , lucchin , f. , matarrese , s. & messina , a. 1993 , , 260 , 572 colley , w. n. 1997 , , 489 , 471 colley , w. n. , gott , j. r. i. , weinberg , d. h. , park , c. and berlind , a. a. 2000 , , 529 , 795 croft , r. a. c. & efstathiou , g. 1994 , , 267 , 390 crofton , m. w. 1868 , phil . lond . a , 158 , 181 davies , a. & coles , p. 1993 , , 260 , 553 dekel , a. & lahav , o. 1999 , , 520 , 24 doroshkevich , a. g. 1970 , astrophysica , 6 , 320 fabbri , r. & torres , s. 1996 , , 307 , 703 fry , j. n. 1984 , , 279 , 499 fry , j. n. & gaztanaga , e. 1993 , , 413 , 447 gabrielli , a. , labini , f. s. & durrer , r. 2000 , , 531 , l1 goroff , m. h. , grinstein , b. , rey , s .- j . & wise , m. b. 1986 , , 311 , 6 gott , j. r. , melott , a. l. & dickinson , m. 1986 , , 306 , 341 gott , j. r. , weinberg , d. h. & melott , a. l. 1987 , , 319 , 1 gott , j. r. , mao , s. , park , c. & lahav , o. 1992 , , 385 , 26 gott , j. r. i. et al . 1989 , , 340 , 625 gott , j. r. , park , c. , juszkiewicz , r. , bies , w. e. , bennett , d. p. , bouchet , f. r. & stebbins , a. 1990 , , 352 , 1 hamilton , a. j. s. , gott , j. r. & weinberg , d. 1986 , , 309 , 1 heavens , a. f. & sheth , r. k. 1999 , , 310 , 1062 jain , b. & bertschinger , e. 1994 , , 431 , 495 jain , b. & van waerbeke , l. 2000 , , 530 , l1 juszkiewicz , r. 1981 , , 197 , 931 juszkiewicz , r. , sonoda , d. h. & barrow , j. d. 1984 , , 209 , 139 juszkiewicz , r. , bouchet , f. r. & colombi , s. 1993 , , 412 , l9 juszkiewicz , r. , weinberg , d. h. amsterdamski , p. , chodorowski , m. & bouchet , f. r. 1995 , , 442 , 39 kaiser , n. 1984 , , 284 , l9 kaiser , n. 1998 , , 498 , 26 kerscher , m. , schmalzing , j. , buchert , t. & wagner , h. 1998 , , 333 , 1 kinoshita , t. 1996 , rep . phys . , 59 , 1459 kogut , a. , banday , a. j. , bennett , c. l. , hinshaw , g. , lubin , p. m. & smoot , g. f. 1995 , , 439 , l29 lahav , o. , lilje , p. b. , primack , j. r. & rees , m. j. 1991 , , 251 , 128 laveday , j. , peterson , b. a. , efstathiou , g. & maddox , s. j. 1992 , , 390 , 338 lightman , a. p. & schechter , p. l. 1990 , , 74 , 831 limber , d. n. 1954 , , 119 , 655 lokas , e. l. 1998 , , 296 , 491 okas , e. l. , juszkiewicz , r. , weinberg , d. h. & bouchet , f. r. 1995 , , 274,730 ma , s .- k . 1985 , statistical mechanics ( philadelphia ; world scientific ) makino , n. , sasaki , m. & suto , y. 1992 , , 46 , 585 & suto , y. 1992 , mann , r. g. , heavens , a. f. & peacock , j. a. 1993 , , 263 , 798 martel , h. 1991 , , 377 , 7 matsubara , t. 1994 , , 434 , l43 matsubara , t. 1995a , , 101 , 1 matsubara , t. 1995b , prog . ( lett . ) , 94 , 1151 matsubara , t. 1996 , , 457 , 13 matsubara , t. 1999 , , 525 , 543 matsubara , t. & suto , y. 1996 , , 460 , 51 matsubara , t. & yokoyama , j. 1996 , , 463 , 409 mecke , k. r. , buchert , t. & wagner , h. 1994 , , 288 , 697 mellier , y. 1999 , ara&a , 37 , 127 melott , a. l. , cohen , a. p. , hamilton , a. j. s. , gott , j. r. & weinberg , d. h. 1989 , , 345 , 618 moore , b. et al . 1992 , , 256 , 477 morse , m. & cairns , s. 1969 , critical point theory in global analysis and differential topology ( new york ; academic press ) naselsky , p. d. & novikov , d. i. 1998 , , 507 , 31 park , c. & gott , j. r. 1991 , , 378 , 457 park , c. , gott , j. r. & da costa , l. n. 1992 , , 392 , l51 park , c. , colley , w. n. , gott , j. r. i. , ratra , b. , spergel , d. n. and sugiyama , n. 1998 , , 506 , 473 peebles , p. j. e. 1980 , the large - scale structure of the universe ( princeton ; princeton university press ) plionis , m. , valdarnini , r. & coles , p. 1992 , , 258 , 114 plionis , m. & valdarnini , r. 1995 , , 272 , 869 protogeros , z. a. m. & weinberg , d. h. 1997 , , 489 , 457 rhoads , j. e. , gott , j. r. i. & postman , m. 1994 , , 421 , 1 ryden , b. s. 1988 , , 333 , l41 ryden , b. s. 1988 , , 100 , 1360 ryden , b. s. , melott , a. l. , craig , d. a. , gott , j. r. , iii , wenberg , d. h. , scherrer , r. j. , bhavsar , s. p. & miller , j. m. 1989 , , 340 , 647 sahni , v. , sathyaprakash , b. s. , & shandarin , s. f. 1998 , , 495 , l5 sahni , v. , sathyaprakash , b. s. , & shandarin , s. f. 1997 , , 476 , l1 sathyaprakash , b. s. , sahni , v. , & shandarin , s. 1998 , , 508 , 551 sazhin , m. v. 1985 , , 216 , 25p scherrer , r. j. & bertschinger , e. 1991 , , 381 , 349 schmalzing , j. & buchert , t. 1997 , , 482 , l1 schmalzing , j. & gorski , k. m. 1998 , , 297 , 355 schmalzing , j. , buchert , t. , melott , a. l. , sahni , v. , sathyaprakash , b. s. & shandarin , s. f. 1999 , , 526 , 568 schmalzing , j. and diaferio , a. 2000 , , 312 , 638 schneider , p. , ehlers , j. , falco , . e. e. 1992 , gravitational lenses , ( springer ) scoccimarro , r & frieman , j. a. 1996a , , 105 , 37 scoccimarro , r & frieman , j. a. 1996b , , 473 , 620 scoccimarro , r. ; . , zaldarriaga , m. , & hui , l. 1999 , , 527 , 1 seto , n. 2000 , , 537 , in press ( astro - ph/0002315 ) smoot , g. f. , tenorio , l. , banday , a. j. , kogut , a. , wright , e. l. , hinshaw , g. & bennett , c. l. 1994 , , 437 , 1 springel , v. , and 10 colleagues 1998 , , 298 , 1169 suto , y. & sasaki , m. 1991 , physical review letters , 66 , 264 taruya , a. & soda , j. 1999 , , 522 , 46 tomita , h. 1986 , progr . , 76 , 952 torres , s. 1994 , , 423 , l9 torres , s. , cayon , l. , martinez - gonzalez , e. & sanz , j. l. 1995 , , 274 , 853 van waerbeke , l. 2000 , , 313 , 524 vishniac , e. t. 1983 , , 203 , 345 vittorio , n. & juszkiewicz , r. 1987 , , 314 , l29 vogeley , m. s. , park , c. , geller , m. j. , huchra , j. p. & gott , j. r. i. 1994 , , 420 , 525 watanabe , t. , matsubara , t. & suto , y. 1994 , , 432 , 17 winitzki , s. & kosowsky , a. 1997 , new astronomy , 3 , 75 Abstract:

Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.

Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered . Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video . Paper: the phase - space formulation of quantum mechanics has received a renewed attention in the last decades @xcite because it allows to employ notions and tools of classical physics in the quantum realm . the central object in this approach is _ wigner s function _ @xmath0 which is merely a phase - space @xmath1 representation of the density matrix @xmath2 . in a closed system , the dynamical equation for the wigner function is equivalent to _ schrdinger s ( or von neumann ) equation _ while , in the @xmath3 limit , it recovers _ liouville s equation _ for the phase - space distribution in classical mechanics . another remarkable property of the wignerian representation is the _ average property_. the expectation value of a quantum operator @xmath4 is obtained from the corresponding classical variable @xmath5 ( related with @xmath4 by weyl s rule ( * ? ? ? * ch . 1 ) ) by a prescription analogous to the classical one , namely @xmath6 thus , in spite of not being necessarily positive , the wigner function can be considered as a sort of quantum - mechanical `` distribution '' . besides , the marginal distributions of @xmath7 give the true quantum probabilities of @xmath8 , as @xmath9 , or of @xmath10 , as @xmath11 . therefore , the wigner formalism provides a natural quantum - classical connection . this has been specially exploited in the search for quantum analogues of various classical effects ( e.g. , chaos ) or in the problem of the fuzzy borders between the quantum and classical worlds @xcite . in contact with the surrounding medium , the ( open ) system experiences dissipation , fluctuations , and decoherence @xcite . typically one is interested in a system consisting of a few relevant degrees of freedom coupled to its environment , or bath , which has a very large number of degrees of freedom ( e.g. , phonons , photons , nuclear spins , etc . ) . the system is not necessarily microscopic , but it can be a mesoscopic system described by some collective variables which under appropriate conditions can behave quantum mechanically @xcite . because of the genericity of these situations and the fundamental issues raised ( e.g. , approach to thermal equilibrium , dissipation in tunnelling and coherence , measurement problem ) , the study of _ quantum dissipative systems _ is of interest in several areas of physics and chemistry @xcite . the dynamics of an open system can in many cases be formulated in terms of a _ quantum master equation _ for the ( reduced ) density matrix . in the wigner representation this can be compactly written as @xmath12 , with @xmath13 a certain evolution operator . taking the classical limit , the master equation for a particle of mass @xmath14 in a potential @xmath15 goes over the klein kramers equation @xcite @xmath16 \wf % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % \;,\ ] ] which is simply a _ planck equation _ in phase space . the first two terms ( poisson bracket ) generate the classical reversible evolution ( liouville equation ) . the last term ( `` collision operator '' ) accounts for irreversible effects due to the coupling to the environment ( dissipation and fluctuations ) . the damping parameter @xmath17 measures the strengh of the coupling to the bath , which is at temperature @xmath18 . it is worth recalling that phase - space dynamics also includes problems reducible to `` mechanical '' analogues : josephson junctions , certain electrical circuits , chemical reactions , etc . a suitable non - perturbative technique to solve classical fokker planck equations of systems with few degrees of freedom is the _ continued - fraction method _ @xcite . this is a special case of the expansion into complete sets ( grad s ) method to solve kinetic equations in statistical mechanics @xcite . in brief , the distribution is expanded into a series of orthogonal polynomials and , as a result , the kinetic equation is transformed into an _ infinite set of coupled equations _ for the expansion coefficients @xmath19 . approximate solutions are obtained by truncating the hierarchy of equations at various levels . to get manageable expressions , however , the truncation needs to be performed at a low level . in the continued - fraction method , instead of truncating directly , one seeks for a basis in which the range of index coupling is short ( ideally , the equation for @xmath19 involves @xmath20 , @xmath19 , and @xmath21 ) . then , the ( differential ) recurrence relations among the @xmath19 can be solved by iterating a simple algorithm , the structure of which is like that of a continued fraction ( [ app : rr - cf ] ) . for the klein kramers equation ( [ kk ] ) the tridiagonal chain of coupled equations for the @xmath19 is called the _ brinkman hierarchy _ it has been solved by continued - fraction methods to study classical particles subjected to dissipation and fluctuations @xcite . the method has been also extended to rotational brownian motion problems involving classical spins and dipoles ( vd . @xcite and references therein ) . to deal with quantum dissipative systems , however , is a more delicate task @xcite . to begin with , phenomenological quantisation of dissipative systems poses fundamental problems ( e.g. , with the uncertainty and superposition principles ) . a rigorous route is to model the bath in a simple way , quantise it together with the system , and eventually trace over the environmental variables . however , the resulting theoretical frameworks are technically involved . _ quantum master equations _ , except for simple cases , are difficult to solve . an alternative is provided by _ quantum state diffusion _ methods ( vd . @xcite ) , where stochastic evolution equations for state vectors in hilbert space are introduced as computational tools . nevertheless , its implementation seems to be restricted to systems with discrete spectrum ( e.g. , oscillators , 2-state systems , etc . ) . similarly , _ quantum langevin equations _ @xcite are of limited use beyond nearly harmonic systems . for an arbitrary system , there exist exact _ path - integral _ expressions for the evolution of the density matrix ( involving the so - called _ influence functional _ that incorporates environmental effects ) @xcite . however , those expressions are difficult to evaluate , even numerically , because the propagating function is highly oscillatory , rendering numerical methods unstable at long times . finally , _ quantum monte carlo _ simulations can in principle be used . nevertheless , in spite of ongoing progress ( vd . @xcite ) , they are computationally complex and suffer from the ( dynamical ) sign problem . this situation strongly motivates the development of _ alternative methods _ for quantum dissipative systems . inspired on their suitability for classical systems , continued - fraction techniques have been developed for a number of problems . shibata and co - workers @xcite applied them to solve a c - number quantum fokker planck equation for a spin in a dissipative environment . vogel and risken @xcite employed continued - fraction methods to solve master equations in quantum nonlinear optics ( vd.also @xcite ) . recently @xcite this method has been extended to study genuine phase - space problems within the wigner formalism . a generalisation of the brinkman hierarchy for quantum master equations of the caldeira leggett type was presented . it was shown that the continued - fraction method for the classical problem can , in principle , be adapted to solve this hierarchy , yielding a promising technique to study several classes of nonlinear quantum systems subjected to environmental effects . in this article we first present the details necessary for the derivation of the quantum hierarchies and discuss their solution by continued fractions . the approach is then implemented for the problem of quantum brownian motion in periodic potentials ( a demanding problem with ( partly ) continuous spectrum ) . both the cosine and simple ratchet potentials ( lacking inversion symmetry ) are considered . for the former a number of previous results are recovered ( so testing the method ) and extended , while the physical interpretations are revisited within the wigner formalism . for particles in ratchet potentials we study the effects of finite damping ( inertia ) on the rectified velocities . the phenomenology is interpreted in terms of the interplay of thermal hopping , overbarrier wave reflection , and tunnelling . results for non - equilibrium dynamics under oscillating forcing are also discussed , which show the combined effect of quantum phenomena , thermal activation , and dissipation in a nonlinear system . a number of technical issues are consigned to the appendices . we start from the following generic form for the quantum master equation in the wigner representation @xcite : @xmath22 \wf % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % \;. \;\ ] ] the first three terms , identifying @xmath23 , give the classical klein kramers equation ( [ kk ] ) . the mixed diffusion term @xmath24 is heuristically related with the colour of the quantum noise @xcite . the series of derivatives @xmath25 ( wigner moyal term ) gives the quantum contribution to the unitary evolution of the closed system . conditions under which this series can be truncated are sometimes discussed , to avoid dealing with an infinite - order partial differential equation . however , we shall fully keep this term because it can be specially important in nonlinear systems @xcite . conditions of validity for the master - equation description are discussed in @xcite . equations of the type of ( [ wkk : dxp ] ) can be derived modelling the particle surroundings as a _ bath of oscillators _ representing the normal modes of the environment . however , a number of assumptions are typically involved like semiclassical or high - temperature bath ( rendering the kernels of the influence functional local in time ) , weak system - bath coupling ( born markov approximations ) , etc . then , one would heuristically expect equation ( [ wkk : dxp ] ) being valid for small enough @xmath26 . notwithstanding this , the _ structure _ of the equation seems to be quite generic . thus , a quantum master equation recently derived for strong coupling @xcite , and valid for all @xmath26 , involves terms similar to those in ( [ wkk : dxp ] ) [ with @xmath8-dependent coefficients and renormalised @xmath15 ] . besides , the phase - space representation of the celebrated lindblad master equation is obtained by simply adding to ( [ wkk : dxp ] ) terms of the form @xmath28 and @xmath29 @xcite . most of these terms can be readily incorporated in the treatment below ( indeed , the term @xmath24 , absent in the original caldeira leggett equation , is included to illustrate this ) . the same , in principle , would apply to possible extensions of the quantum master equation ( [ wkk : dxp ] ) . first it is convenient to introduce appropriate scaled units . these are based on a characteristic length @xmath30 ( e.g. , the distance between the minima in a double - well oscillator , the period in a periodic potential ) and a characteristic energy @xmath31 ( e.g. , a barrier height ) . then one scales frequencies by @xmath32 , time by @xmath33 , forces by @xmath34 , the action by @xmath35 , etc . on the other hand , @xmath36 ( @xmath37 in a high-@xmath18 bath ) is handled as an effective temperature @xmath38 and we introduce some convenient thermal rescalings via @xmath39 . thus , in the equations @xmath10 is scaled by @xmath40 , the potential and @xmath41 appear divided by @xmath42 , @xmath17 enters in the combination @xmath43 , time is multiplied by @xmath44 , while the thermal de broglie wave length @xmath45 enters divided by @xmath30 . omitting any marks for the scaled quantities ( but keeping in mind specially the thermal rescaling of @xmath46 , @xmath15 and @xmath10 ) , the master equation is simply written as @xmath47 \wf % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % \ ; , \quad\ ] ] with the coefficient in the quantum sum given by @xmath48 planck s constant @xmath49 is introduced in terms of the characteristic action @xmath35 via the quantum parameter @xmath50 ( denoted @xmath51 in @xcite ) @xmath52 the second relation gives @xmath53 in terms of the kondo parameter @xmath54 , related by the third one with our @xmath50 . the classical limit is approached as @xmath55 , i.e. , letting @xmath56 . let us now introduce a splitting of the evolution operator @xmath13 that will facilitate the calculation of the matrix elements required when expanding @xmath57 into complete sets . on inspecting equations ( [ wkk : scaled ] ) and ( [ kappa : s ] ) , we see that extending the quantum sum down to @xmath58 , we obtain the part @xmath59 of the classical term . thus , we can decompose @xmath13 into the irreversible , kinetic , and potential parts : @xmath60 % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % \lkin & = & -\big(\p-\bdxp\pp\big)\ , \px \\[0.5ex ] % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % \lv & = & \sumiqo \qcoef^{(\iq ) } \ , \bv^{(2\iq+1 ) } \ , \pp^{(2\iq+1 ) } \end{array } \right . % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % \;.\ ] ] this natural splitting has the advantage of dealing with @xmath15 ( the most problem dependent part ) in a unified way . besides , we have grouped the term @xmath61 with the kinetic term @xmath62 because they are structurally similar . in the expansion into complete sets approach to solve kinetic equations , the distribution is expanded in an orthonormal basis @xmath63 and the coupled equations for the coefficients @xmath64 derived @xcite . for the klein kramers equation ( [ kk ] ) one uses hermite functions of @xmath10 as basis ( * ? ? ? * sec 4.4 ) @xmath65^{-1/2 } % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % \;.\ ] ] one starts with the expansion in the momentum because , while the @xmath10 dependence of the hamiltonian is fully specified ( kinetic energy @xmath66 ) , the potential part @xmath15 depends on the problem . thus , explicit manipulations can be done on the parts involving @xmath10 , which are valid for any system . on the other hand , the hermite basis has a number of advantages @xcite ; not the least is the handling of the derivatives @xmath67 in the dynamical equation by means of the associated creation and annihilation operators @xmath68 and @xmath69 ( this will prove very convenient in the quantum case ) . for the klein kramers equation the resulting equations for the expansion coefficients @xmath64 are called the _ brinkman hierarchy _ @xcite . this plays an important rle in classical systems , both for analytical treatments derivations of @xmath70 expansions , etc. and to develope efficient non - perturbative numerical methods . in fact , it has the structure of a @xmath71-term recurrence relation which , after expansion in the position basis , can be solved by continued fractions . in what follows we shall proceed in the quantum case following as closely as possible the steps of the classical limit . we start expanding the wigner function as @xmath72 where we have extracted the boltzmann - type factor @xmath73 . this involves the auxiliary parameter @xmath74 and potential @xmath75 , which is frequently chosen proportional to @xmath76 , i.e. , @xmath77 . the results should not depend on the @xmath78 or @xmath79 used , but these may ( i ) put parts of the evolution operator @xmath13 in self - adjoint form and/or ( ii ) improve the stability and convergence of the eventual numerical implementation . from the orthonormality of the @xmath80 , the expansion `` coefficients '' can be written as @xmath81 . then , differentiating with respect to @xmath46 and using the evolution equation @xmath12 , we get the dynamical equations for @xmath64 @xmath82 to get the matrix elements @xmath83 , which are still operators on the @xmath8-dependence of @xmath84 , one needs the @xmath85 transform of @xmath13 . this can be split as @xmath86 , with @xmath87 , @xmath88 , and @xmath89 given by ( [ wkk : lir : lkin : lv ] ) . the transformation of these operators is done in [ app : lb ] , taking advantage of results for _ normal ordering _ of @xmath90 and @xmath91 ( which we use to express the @xmath67 and @xmath10 s in @xmath13 ) . then , with the @xmath92 , @xmath93 , and @xmath94 obtained we compute their matrix elements between the @xmath95 , getting the @xmath83 . the details of this part of the calculation are given in [ app : qnm ] . introducing the results obtained for @xmath83 into @xmath96 one gets the following _ quantum ( brinkman ) hierarchy _ @xmath97 } \ , \big [ \g_{\ip}^{\iq,- } \ , \bv^{(2\iq+1 ) } \big ] \ , \ec_{\ip-(2\iq+1 ) } + \sqrt{(\ip-1)\ip}\ ; \gammamm \ , \ec_{\ip-2 } \nonumber\\ % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % & & { } + \sqrt{\ip}\ ; \dm \ec_{\ip-1 } + \gammao_{\ip } \ , \ec_{\ip } + \sqrt{\ip+1}\ ; \dp \ec_{\ip+1 } \\ % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % & & { } + \sqrt{(\ip+1)(\ip+2)}\ ; \gammapp \ , \ec_{\ip+2 } + \sum_{\iq=0}^{\infty } \big [ \g_{\ip+(2\iq+1)}^{\iq,+ } \ , \bv^{(2\iq+1 ) } \big ] \ , \ec_{\ip+(2\iq+1 ) } \nonumber % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % \;.\end{aligned}\ ] ] the auxiliary ( damping ) parameters introduced read @xmath98 % [ ( \etap-\etapro)+2\ip(\etab-\etapro ) ] % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % \;,\ ] ] which involve the following @xmath78-related parameters ( note the sign exchange ) @xmath99 in equation ( [ qbh ] ) , the operators on the @xmath8 dependences are @xmath100 here @xmath101 , @xmath102 is the confluent hypergeometric ( kummer ) function ( * ? ? ? * ch . 13.6 ) , and @xmath103 is given by equation ( [ kappa : s ] ) . in is important to note that the @xmath104 act only on @xmath15 not on the @xmath105 ( [ app : lb ] ) . the quantum hierarchy ( [ qbh ] ) is equivalent to the caldeira leggett master equation ( [ wkk : dxp ] ) . previously , several hierarchies had been derived @xcite , but the treatment was for closed ( hamiltonian ) systems @xcite or involved unsuitable bases like @xmath106 @xcite . in contrast , our hierarchy of _ hermitian moments _ constitutes a direct quantum generalisation of the brinkman hierarchy . to verify this , note that in the classical case only the @xmath58 terms survive in the sums of ( [ qbh ] ) ( [ app : qnm ] ) . then , setting the usual @xmath107 , equation ( [ qbh ] ) reduces to @xmath108 % \;,\ ] ] which is indeed the celebrated hierarchy associated to the klein kramers equation . for potentials obeying @xmath109 , @xmath110 , the quantum hierarchy ( [ qbh ] ) is a recurrence relation with coupling to a finite number of terms . examples include the harmonic oscillator @xmath111 and the double - well ( duffing ) oscillator @xmath112 . finite - coupling recurrences are always reducible to @xmath71-term vector recurrences ( [ app : rr - cf ] ) and solvable by continued fractions , as in the classical case . however , for non - polynomial @xmath15 this approach is prevented by the infinite coupling range in the index @xmath113 , consequence of the infinite series of @xmath10-derivatives @xmath114 in the wigner moyal term . in what follows we shall exploit the expansion in the position basis to show how this problem can be circumvented . recall that the coefficients @xmath64 are still functions of @xmath8 . inserting their expansion in an orthonormal basis @xmath115 into the quantum hierarchy ( [ dcdt : qtot : lbar ] ) , we get the generic form @xmath116 with matrix elements @xmath117 . to put ( [ qbh ] ) into the above form we just need to ( i ) substitute the operators ( and @xmath8-dependent coefficients ) by their matrix elements @xmath118 , ( ii ) attach position superscripts to the @xmath64 , and , finally , ( iii ) sum over them . on so doing we get the _ expanded quantum hierarchy _ @xmath119_{\ix\ixp}\ , \ec_{\ip-(2\iq+1)}^{\ixp } + \sqrt{(\ip-1)\ip } \sum_{\ixp } \gammamm \ , \delta_{\ix\ixp } \ , \ec_{\ip-2}^{\ixp } \nonumber\\ % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % \fl & { } + \sqrt{\ip } \sum_{\ixp } \dm_{\ix\ixp}\ , \ec_{\ip-1}^{\ixp } + \sum_{\ixp } \gammao_{\ip}\ , \delta_{\ix\ixp } \ , \ec_{\ip}^{\ixp } + \sqrt{\ip+1 } \sum_{\ixp } \dp_{\ix\ixp}\ , \ec_{\ip+1}^{\ixp } \\ % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % \fl & { } + \sqrt{(\ip+1)(\ip+2 ) } \sum_{\ixp } \gammapp \ , \delta_{\ix\ixp } \ , \ec_{\ip+2}^{\ixp } + \sumiqo \sum_{\ixp } \big [ \g_{\ip+(2\iq+1)}^{\iq,+ } \bv^{(2\iq+1 ) } \big]_{\ix\ixp}\ , \ec_{\ip+(2\iq+1)}^{\ixp } \nonumber % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % \;.\end{aligned}\ ] ] considering that @xmath120 and @xmath77 , we see that to get all matrix elements involved we just need those of @xmath121 and of @xmath122 , namely @xmath123 because the @xmath104 only increase the order of the potential derivatives . the expanded hierarchy has the form of a system of ordinary differential equations , @xmath124 . if @xmath125 and @xmath126 are some large truncation indices for the bases @xmath127 and @xmath115 , we have a problem with @xmath128 equations . one may be tempted to try direct runge kutta integration or numerical diagonalization of the associated @xmath129 matrix . however , the dimensions involved are typically very large , so that it is worth to pursue a continued - fraction treatment . as mentioned before the @xmath10-recurrence has a finite coupling range for polynomial potentials . for other potentials , with an appropriate choice of the basis @xmath115 , the matrix elements ( [ matr - elem : der : v ] ) may vanish when the second index @xmath130 lays at a certain `` distance '' of the first @xmath131 . then , the expanded hierarchy would be a recurrence relation in the position indices with a finite coupling range , also amenable for a continued - fraction treatment . to proceed in these cases , we just need to transform the two - index extended hierarchies into ordinary recurrence problems ( i.e. , with one index ) . in order to apply the continued - fraction method when finite coupling range in one of the indices is attained , we need to convert first the two - index recurrences into ordinary recursions . in the resulting one - index recurrences the coefficients will be matrices acting on appropriate vectors formed with the @xmath132 . the generic expanded form ( [ dcdt : generic ] ) can be converted into an _ one - index _ recurrence relation in the momentum index introducing the following vectors and matrices @xmath133 where @xmath134 . that is , for a fixed @xmath113 one forms the column vector with all the @xmath132 with @xmath135 ( this index may take positive and negative values ) . similarly , for given @xmath136 we build the matrix @xmath137 with all indices @xmath138 . before giving explicit expressions for the matrix coefficients we introduce the following notation : @xmath139 , @xmath140 , @xmath141 , and @xmath142 . then , the matrix quantum hierarchy ( [ dcdt : vectors : matrices : p ] ) can be written as @xmath143 % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % & & { } + \mq_{\ip}^{- } \mc_{\ip-1 } + \mq_{\ip } \mc_{\ip } + \mq_{\ip}^{+ } \mc_{\ip+1 } \\[+0.5ex ] % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % & & { } + \mq_{\ip}^{++ } \mc_{\ip+2 } + { \textstyle\sum}_{\iq\ge1 } \mq_{\ip}^{+(2\iq+1 ) } \mc_{\ip+(2\iq+1 ) } \nonumber % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % \;.\end{aligned}\ ] ] we have accounted for @xmath144 , @xmath145 [ vd . equation ( [ qbh : pre - matrix : i ] ) ] and incorporated the @xmath58 terms into the central @xmath146 ones . the matrix coefficients explicitly read @xmath147_{\ix\ixp}\ , \\ % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % \big ( \mq_{\ip}^{-- } \big)_{\ix\ixp } & = & -\sqrt{(\ip-1)\ip}\ ; \gammamm\ , \delta_{\ix\ixp } \\ % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % \big ( \mq_{\ip}^{- } \big)_{\ix\ixp } & = & - \sqrt{\ip}\ , \dm_{\ix\ixp } - \big [ \g_{\ip}^{0,- } \bv ' \big]_{\ix\ixp}\ , \\ % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % \big ( \mq_{\ip } \big)_{\ix\ixp } & = & - \gammao_{\ip}\,\delta_{\ix\ixp } \\ % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % \big ( \mq_{\ip}^{+ } \big)_{\ix\ixp } & = & - \sqrt{\ip+1}\ , \dp_{\ix\ixp } - \big [ \g_{\ip+1}^{0,+ } \bv ' \big]_{\ix\ixp}\ , \\ % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % \big ( \mq_{\ip}^{++ } \big)_{\ix\ixp } & = & -\sqrt{(\ip+1)(\ip+2)}\ ; \gammapp\ , \delta_{\ix\ixp } \\ % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % \big ( \mq_{\ip}^{+(2\iq+1 ) } \big)_{\ix\ixp } & = & - \big [ \g_{\ip+(2\iq+1)}^{\iq,+ } \bv^{(2\iq+1 ) } \big]_{\ix\ixp}\ , % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % \end{array } \right . % \;.\ ] ] for finite coupling range in @xmath113 ( e.g. , in polynomial potentials ) , the hierarchy ( [ qbh : matrix : p ] ) is a recurrence relation to which continued - fraction methods can now be applied . this amounts to convert the underlying large @xmath129 problem into @xmath125 problems with associated @xmath148 matrices [ or @xmath149 . as the recursion `` coefficients '' are matrices , one would need _ matrix continued - fraction _ methods ( [ app : rr - cf ] ) . when the @xmath10-recurrence has an infinite coupling range ( in periodic potentials , the morse potential , etc . ) , we can convert the @xmath150-index hierarchy ( [ dcdt : generic ] ) into matrix form , but introducing recurrences in the position index @xmath131 @xmath151 that is , @xmath152 , with @xmath153 . thus , for a fixed @xmath131 one constructs the column vector with the @xmath132 for all @xmath154 , and for given @xmath155 , the matrix @xmath137 with all @xmath156 . comparing the matrix in ( [ dcdt : vectors : matrices : x ] ) with equation ( [ q : matr - elem : p : i ] ) for @xmath157 , we can construct @xmath158 diagonal by diagonal @xmath159_{\ix\ixp}\ , \\ % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % \big ( \mq_{\ix\ixp } \big)_{\ip,\ip-2 } & = & -\sqrt{(\ip-1)\ip}\ ; \gammamm\ , \delta_{\ix\ixp } \\ % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % \big ( \mq_{\ix\ixp } \big)_{\ip,\ip-1 } & = & - \sqrt{\ip}\ , \dm_{\ix\ixp } - \big [ \g_{\ip}^{0,- } \bv ' \big]_{\ix\ixp}\ , \\ % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % \big ( \mq_{\ix\ixp } \big)_{\ip,\ip } & = & - \gammao_{\ip}\,\delta_{\ix\ixp } \\ % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % \big ( \mq_{\ix\ixp } \big)_{\ip,\ip+1 } & = & - \sqrt{\ip+1}\ , \dp_{\ix\ixp } - \big [ \g_{\ip+1}^{0,+ } \bv ' \big]_{\ix\ixp}\ , \\ % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % \big ( \mq_{\ix\ixp } \big)_{\ip,\ip+2 } & = & -\sqrt{(\ip+1)(\ip+2)}\ ; \gammapp\ , \delta_{\ix\ixp } \\ % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % \big ( \mq_{\ix\ixp } \big)_{\ip,\ip+(2\iq+1 ) } & = & - \big [ \g_{\ip+(2\iq+1)}^{\iq,+ } \bv^{(2\iq+1 ) } \big]_{\ix\ixp}\ , % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % \end{array } \right . % \;.\ ] ] all other diagonals being zero @xmath160 , @xmath145 . to recognise better the structure of these matrices , we decompose them into the `` free '' and potential contributions @xmath161 . for @xmath162 , including the kinetic and irreversible terms , we have the pentadiagonal structure ( tridiagonal for @xmath107 ) @xmath163 the part due to @xmath15 , on the other hand , has the following alternate dense structure , reflecting the odd powers of @xmath67 in the wigner moyal term : @xmath164_{\ix\ixp } \!\!\!\!&\!\!\!\ ! 0 \!\!\!\!&\!\!\!\ ! [ \g_{3}^{1,+ } \bv^{(3)}]_{\ix\ixp } \!\!\!\!&\!\!\!\ ! 0 \!\!\!\!&\!\!\!\ ! [ \g_{5}^{2,+ } \bv^{(5)}]_{\ix\ixp } \!\!\!\!&\!\ ! \ddots \\[0.ex ] % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % line-1 [ \g_{1}^{0,- } \bv']_{\ix\ixp } \!\!\!\!&\!\!\!\ ! 0 \!\!\!\!&\!\!\!\ ! [ \g_{2}^{0,+ } \bv']_{\ix\ixp } \!\!\!\!&\!\!\!\ ! 0 \!\!\!\!&\!\!\!\ ! [ \g_{4}^{1,+ } \bv^{(3)}]_{\ix\ixp } \!\!\!\!&\!\!\!\ ! 0 \!\!\!\!&\!\ ! \ddots \\[0.ex ] % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % line-2 0 \!\!\!\!&\!\!\!\ ! [ \g_{2}^{0,- } \bv']_{\ix\ixp } \!\!\!\!&\!\!\!\ ! 0 \!\!\!\!&\!\!\!\ ! [ \g_{3}^{0,+ } \bv']_{\ix\ixp } \!\!\!\!&\!\!\!\ ! 0 \!\!\!\!&\!\!\!\ ! [ \g_{5}^{1,+ } \bv^{(3)}]_{\ix\ixp } \!\!\!\!&\!\ ! \ddots \\[0.ex ] % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % line-3 [ \g_{3}^{1,- } \bv^{(3)}]_{\ix\ixp } \!\!\!\!&\!\!\!\ ! 0 \!\!\!\!&\!\!\!\ ! [ \g_{3}^{0,- } \bv']_{\ix\ixp } \!\!\!\!&\!\!\!\ ! 0 \!\!\!\!&\!\!\!\ ! [ \g_{4}^{0,+ } \bv']_{\ix\ixp } \!\!\!\!&\!\!\!\ ! 0 \!\!\!\!&\!\ ! \ddots \\[0.ex ] % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % line-4 0 \!\!\!\!&\!\!\!\ ! [ \g_{4}^{1,- } \bv^{(3)}]_{\ix\ixp } \!\!\!\!&\!\!\!\ ! 0 \!\!\!\!&\!\!\!\ ! [ \g_{4}^{0,- } \bv']_{\ix\ixp } \!\!\!\!&\!\!\!\ ! 0 \!\!\!\!&\!\!\!\ ! [ \g_{5}^{0,+ } \bv']_{\ix\ixp } \!\!\!\!&\!\ ! \ddots \\[0.ex ] % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % line-5 [ \g_{5}^{2,- } \bv^{(5)}]_{\ix\ixp } \!\!\!\!&\!\!\!\ ! 0 \!\!\!\!&\!\!\!\ ! [ \g_{5}^{1,- } \bv^{(3)}]_{\ix\ixp } \!\!\!\!&\!\!\!\ ! 0 \!\!\!\!&\!\!\!\ ! [ \g_{5}^{0,- } \bv']_{\ix\ixp } \!\!\!\!&\!\!\!\ ! 0 \!\!\!\!&\!\ ! \ddots \\[0.ex ] % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % line-6 \ddots \!\!\!\!&\!\!\!\ ! \ddots \!\!\!\!&\!\!\!\ ! \ddots \!\!\!\!&\!\!\!\ ! \ddots \!\!\!\!&\!\!\!\ ! \ddots \!\!\!\!&\!\!\!\ ! \ddots \!\!\!\!&\!\ ! \ddots \end{array } \right ) % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % \ ] ] with an appropriate choice of the basis @xmath115 the matrix elements @xmath118 may couple only a finite number of basis functions . then , the recurrence ( [ dcdt : vectors : matrices : x ] ) would be solvable by continued fractions when the @xmath113-recurrence is infinite and this approach is seemingly precluded . even for finite coupling in @xmath113 , the @xmath131-recurrence may be preferable in certain situations ( e.g. , at low @xmath18 ) , as indicated by risken for a cosine potential in the classical limit ( * ? ? ? 11.5.6 ) ) . in these cases , one has been able to reduce the underlying large @xmath129 problem to @xmath126 problems with associated @xmath165 matrices . once the @xmath166 or @xmath167 are solved , we can reconstruct the wigner function from its expansion coefficients @xmath132 in the double basis @xmath168 @xmath169 obtaining the _ full solution of the quantum master equation_. if preferred , one can switch to the familiar density matrix @xmath170 by the inverse of transformation ( [ wigner : def ] ) @xmath171 we can get any observable inserting the above @xmath57 in equation ( [ average ] ) for the averages . nevertheless , common observables can many times be extracted _ directly _ from the @xmath132 . let us illustrate this with transport observables , which are characterised by the averages @xmath172 . for an arbitrary function of @xmath10 only , we get from ( [ w : expansion : xp ] ) @xmath173 where we have used @xmath174 , with @xmath175 [ equations ( [ hermite ] ) and ( [ w : expansion ] ) ] . next we introduce the auxiliary integrals ( for their calculation vd.[app : auxint ] ) @xmath176 then , the moments ( case @xmath177 ) can be written in terms of the expansion coefficients as @xmath178 . taking into account that @xmath179 has the parity of @xmath113 and carrying this to @xmath180 , we get for the first two @xmath181 the first moment is the _ current _ and the second characterises _ fluctuations _ around it . the zeroth moment corresponds to the _ normalisation _ of @xmath7 , and imposses on the @xmath132 the condition @xmath182 . finally , the quantum probabilities of @xmath8 and @xmath10 , given by the marginal distributions @xmath183 and @xmath184 , can be expressed in a similar fashion @xmath185 henceforth we shall apply the method described to incorporate fluctuations and dissipation in the problem of _ quantum transport in periodic potentials_. the simplest model consists of a particle evolving in a cosine potential subjected to external forces ( tilted `` washboard '' potential ) , which is also a paradigm of _ quantum brownian motion _ others include potentials lacking inversion symmetry ( ratchets ) , which have been used to model rectification of current and _ directional motion _ in several systems @xcite . these problems are demanding because periodic potentials have ( partly ) continuous spectra @xcite , rendering inappropriate methods devised for systems with discrete levels . in this section we compute the matrix coefficients of our recurrences for arbitrary periodic @xmath15 . with them we can implement the continued - fraction method to solve the quantum master equation , which we first check by regaining the classical dissipative and quantum hamiltonian limits . in periodic potentials the @xmath10-recurrence can not be used because of its infinite coupling range ( the derivatives of @xmath15 neither vanish , nor decrease , as they are essentially the potential itself ) . however , one can guess that the @xmath8-recurrence may have a coupling range related with the number of harmonics in @xmath15 . to exploit this we introduce plane waves as basis functions and the fourier expansion of the potential derivative : @xmath186 to preserve the periodicity of @xmath7 , one extracts the external force @xmath187 from @xmath15 including it in a generalised @xmath188 ; cf . equation ( [ dmdp ] ) . then , the auxiliary potential @xmath189 is set proportional to the periodic part @xmath77 . to compute the matrix elements in @xmath158 , we only need to do the integrals ( [ matr - elem : der : v ] ) with plane waves for @xmath190 . using @xmath191 , the integral @xmath192 , and the expansion @xmath193 , we find @xmath194_{\ix\ixp}=\v_{\ix-\ixp}^{(\iq ) } % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % \;.\ ] ] from these elements and @xmath195 we get @xmath196_{\ix\ixp } & = & 0 & \delta_{\ix\ixp } & - & \etapm^{2\iq+1 } \gs_{\ip}^{\iq}(-\etapro \qab^{2}\ldb^{2 } ) & \v_{\ix-\ixp } ' \\ % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % \dpm_{\ix\ixp } & = & \big(\iu\,\dplmi\ix-\etapm\bf\big ) & \delta_{\ix\ixp } & - & \dplmi\epspot & \bv_{\ix-\ixp } ' % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % \end{array } % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % \ ] ] with @xmath197 , @xmath101 and [ cf . equation ( [ gamma : qcoeff ] ) ] @xmath198 that is , @xmath199 is the coefficient in ( [ gamma : qcoeff ] ) with @xmath200 . inserting equation ( [ dmdpvper : matr - elem ] ) into the general matrices @xmath158 of section [ sec : mqbh ] we explicitly get the matrix coefficients of our recurrences ( [ app : matrices ] ) . for the cosine potential @xmath201 the coupling range is @xmath202 , because @xmath203 for @xmath204 and we have a @xmath71-term recurrence @xmath205 . for a @xmath150-harmonic ratchet potential @xmath206 % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % \;,\ ] ] the range is @xmath150 ( @xmath207-term recurrence ) because @xmath203 for @xmath208 , and so on . as we restricted @xmath74 , we have @xmath209 , so that @xmath210 . thus , the argument of @xmath211 is positive and @xmath212 can act as a regularisation factor [ an advantage of allowing @xmath213 in ( [ w : expansion ] ) ] . this factor reduces the weight of the off - diagonal terms inside @xmath158 , enhancing the numerical stability when going into the deep quantum regime . then we typically use @xmath214@xmath215 , while for classical calculations @xmath107 performs better . concerning the auxiliary potential @xmath189 , for the problems considered below we use @xmath216 . convergence is achieved with @xmath217 hermite functions and @xmath218 plane waves [ then @xmath219 . finally , a word on the scaled quantities ( section [ sec : wkk : scaled ] ) . to get period @xmath220 , we have set @xmath221 with @xmath222 the original period . the characteristic energy @xmath31 is given by the potential amplitude @xmath223 ; then @xmath224 is scaled by @xmath225 and the other characteristic quantities are : action , @xmath226 , frequency , @xmath227 , and force , @xmath228 . ) for a particle in a tilted sinusoidal potential ( two periods are displayed along @xmath8 ) . here @xmath229 , and @xmath230 , while @xmath231 , @xmath232 , @xmath233 , and @xmath234 ( left to right , top to bottom ) . , title="fig : " ] ) for a particle in a tilted sinusoidal potential ( two periods are displayed along @xmath8 ) . here @xmath229 , and @xmath230 , while @xmath231 , @xmath232 , @xmath233 , and @xmath234 ( left to right , top to bottom ) . , title="fig : " ] ) for a particle in a tilted sinusoidal potential ( two periods are displayed along @xmath8 ) . here @xmath229 , and @xmath230 , while @xmath231 , @xmath232 , @xmath233 , and @xmath234 ( left to right , top to bottom ) . , title="fig : " ] ) for a particle in a tilted sinusoidal potential ( two periods are displayed along @xmath8 ) . here @xmath229 , and @xmath230 , while @xmath231 , @xmath232 , @xmath233 , and @xmath234 ( left to right , top to bottom ) . , title="fig : " ] before going into the quantum regime , let us check that for small enough @xmath235 we recover the classical results . recall that in the deterministic limit a particle in a periodic potential has two critical forces @xmath236 ( retrapping force ) and @xmath237 ( force at which the barrier disappears ) . for @xmath238 the attractors of the dynamical system are solutions `` locked '' around the potential minima , whereas for @xmath239 the `` running '' solution is an attractor globally stable . in the range @xmath240 the system exhibits bistability . finally , @xmath236 decreases with @xmath17 [ for the cosine potential @xmath241 , whereas @xmath236 tends to @xmath237 as the damping increases , narrowing the bistability range . thermal fluctuations are incorporated by the klein kramers equation , which for classical particles in periodic potentials was solved by continued fractions in @xcite ( using the @xmath10-recurrence ) . here we solve the caldeira leggett quantum master equation ( [ wkk : dxp ] ) using a large @xmath50 . as shown before , when @xmath242 we have a @xmath71-term recurrence which , for the static response , can be written as @xmath243 with @xmath244 , @xmath245 , and @xmath246 . solving it with the continued - fraction method we reobtain risken s impressive graphs for the classical distribution @xmath57 ( * ? ? ? some of them are displayed in figure [ fig : risken ] for weak damping and various external forces ( here @xmath247 and @xmath248 ) . at low @xmath249 the distribution , always periodic along @xmath8 , has maxima at the potential minima , while the profile in momenta is a maxwellian envelope @xmath250 . as @xmath249 is increased we see the evolution from these _ locked _ solutions ( @xmath251 ) to bistability between the locked and _ running _ solutions , and eventually purely running states @xmath252 $ ] are obtained at large forces . having checked the retrieval of the classical results , we now enter the quantum regime by decreasing @xmath253 . firstly , it will be useful to get a more quantitative feeling of the relation of our parameter @xmath50 and `` how quantal is the system '' . to this end we study the bands of the corresponding hamiltonian problem ( without force ) . inserting the _ bloch _ function @xmath254 in the schrdinger equation , we arrive at the following eigenvalue problem ( in scaled units ; section [ sec : wkk : scaled ] ) @xmath255 u(\x ) = e\ , u(\x ) % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % \ ; , \quad % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % -\half\leq \q\leq\half % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % \;.\ ] ] expanding @xmath256 in plane waves ( [ vper ] ) and truncating @xmath257 at some large @xmath126 one gets a @xmath258 matrix which is diagonalised numerically . various bands @xmath259 pertaining to problems discussed below are displayed in figure [ fig : bands ] . we see that the rule of thumb is that @xmath260 is of the order of the number of bands laying below the barrier . finally , the quantum parameter used by kandemir @xcite is @xmath261 , while chen and lebowitz employed @xmath262 @xcite . besides , for a josephson junction problem we have @xmath263 , with @xmath264 and @xmath265 the josephson and coulomb energies . ( left ) and @xmath150 ( right ) . the `` islands '' correspond to zones of negative @xmath7 . , title="fig : " ] ( left ) and @xmath150 ( right ) . the `` islands '' correspond to zones of negative @xmath7 . , title="fig : " ] let us continue for a while in the hamiltonian case to familiarise ourselves with the structure of the schrdinger eigenstates in a phase - space representation . kandemir @xcite obtained analytical approximations for the eigenfunctions of a particle in a cosine potential in terms of mathieu functions . they were represented through the wigner function associated to the density matrix of pure states @xmath266 . ( in @xcite various dirac deltas occurring were regularised with gaussians @xmath267 and in the plots @xmath268 was used ; we attain the same setting @xmath230 since our @xmath10 is thermally rescaled . ) using a very small damping ( @xmath269 ) in the caldeira leggett master equation we reobtain kandemir s hamiltonian results for the ground state ( figure [ fig : kandemir ] ) . we see that at low @xmath50 the state is extended or delocalised , becoming more localised at the potential wells when @xmath270 is increased . according to @xcite , the regions of negative @xmath7 are associated to brillouin zone boundaries . we have represented a larger range of @xmath10 to see how these @xmath271 islands are repeated in the @xmath10 direction ( @xmath7 can be as small as @xmath272 bordering the limits of our numerical accuracy ) . to see how these structures arise , note that for small @xmath50 the potential can be treated perturbatively [ equation ( [ schrodinger : bloch ] ) ] . then , the wave functions have the form @xmath273 , with @xmath274 . the first term is a pure plane wave , and the rest first order corrections due to the sinusoidal @xmath15 . performing the wigner transform ( [ wigner : def ] ) of @xmath275 , we get for the ground state @xmath276 ( cf . @xcite ) @xmath277 \nonumber\\ % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % & - 2|\lambda|^{2 } \cos(2\x)\ , \delta(\p ) + 2\iu\lambda \sin(\x ) \big [ \delta(\p-\half ) + \delta(\p+\half ) \big ] % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % \;.\end{aligned}\ ] ] the first line gives the momentum localisation at @xmath278 ( unperturbed ) and at @xmath279 . the first term in the second line arises from the interference of @xmath280 and @xmath281 , and is responsible for the weak modulation of the height of the @xmath278 bell along @xmath8 . this modulation is more intense for larger @xmath282 ( i.e. , larger @xmath50 ) . the last term accounts for the interference between the plane wave centred at @xmath278 with those at @xmath279 , and can produce the negative islands . therefore , the above simple functional form captures most features of the wigner funtions of figure [ fig : kandemir ] . after checking the connection with the classical and hamiltonian quantum limits , we finally include dissipation and temperature in the quantum case . here examples of particles in cosine and ratchet potentials will be discussed . transport properties of weakly damped particles in a cosine potential were studied by chen and lebowitz @xcite . they started from the system - plus - bath density matrix , traced out the bath variables , and performed a perturbative calculation in the potential height ( followed by a resummation ) to get @xmath283 . for low forces a free - particle like behaviour @xmath284 was obtained . increasing @xmath249 , the wave - vector associated to @xmath10 approaches the first zone boundary ( figure [ fig : bands ] ) . there , while landau zener tunnelling can bring the particle to the next band , bragg scattering reduces the velocity ( @xmath285 ) . eventually , at larger forces , @xmath10 corresponding to states inside the next band become favoured , and the free - particle behaviour is progressively recovered . vs. @xmath249 for various dampings at @xmath286 and @xmath287 . right : marginal distribution of momenta @xmath288 for @xmath289 at @xmath290 , @xmath291 , @xmath292 , @xmath293 , and @xmath207 . the arrows mark the zone boundaries @xmath294 . bottom panels : two views of @xmath57 for @xmath289 and @xmath290 . , title="fig : " ] vs. @xmath249 for various dampings at @xmath286 and @xmath287 . right : marginal distribution of momenta @xmath288 for @xmath289 at @xmath290 , @xmath291 , @xmath292 , @xmath293 , and @xmath207 . the arrows mark the zone boundaries @xmath294 . bottom panels : two views of @xmath57 for @xmath289 and @xmath290 . , title="fig : " ] vs. @xmath249 for various dampings at @xmath286 and @xmath287 . right : marginal distribution of momenta @xmath288 for @xmath289 at @xmath290 , @xmath291 , @xmath292 , @xmath293 , and @xmath207 . the arrows mark the zone boundaries @xmath294 . bottom panels : two views of @xmath57 for @xmath289 and @xmath290 . , title="fig : " ] vs. @xmath249 for various dampings at @xmath286 and @xmath287 . right : marginal distribution of momenta @xmath288 for @xmath289 at @xmath290 , @xmath291 , @xmath292 , @xmath293 , and @xmath207 . the arrows mark the zone boundaries @xmath294 . bottom panels : two views of @xmath57 for @xmath289 and @xmath290 . , title="fig : " ] since high @xmath295 approximations were involved in their calculations , we set @xmath23 and @xmath296 in the master equation ( [ wkk : dxp ] ) . solving it with the continued - fraction method we reobtain the effect just described ( figure [ fig : cheleb92 ] ; here we work in the regime @xmath297 ) . note that this quantum slowing effect is reduced as @xmath17 increases , since the coupling to the bath `` broadens '' the effective energy levels . this broadening makes less relevant the presence of the band gap ( `` bridges '' it ) and brings the curves progressively closer to the free - damped - particle behaviour @xmath284 . with our method we get , in addition , the wigner function ( i.e. , the full density matrix ) . the distribution of velocities ( [ wp ] ) , @xmath184 , when the curves start to rise again ( @xmath298 ) , shows two peaks separated by a minimum corresponding to the wave vector of the first zone boundary . loosely speaking the system shows coexistence of _ two _ quantum `` running '' solutions . classical running solutions have a wiggling structure along @xmath8 , as the particle slows down near the potential maxima ( figure [ fig : risken ] ) . the full @xmath57 shows that the quantum running solutions have a nearly straight structure ( substrate insensitive ) . we also recognise the familiar crescent islands of negative @xmath7 at large @xmath10 ( there @xmath299 ) . around @xmath300 a complex structure is developed along @xmath8 ( `` locked part '' ) , with the maxima deformed and the minima becoming slightly negative ( @xmath301 ) . these features may reflect some interference between the locked and the nearby running solution . however , simply adding a plane wave @xmath302 to the @xmath303 used to analyse the wigner functions of the hamiltonial problem [ equation ( [ wigner : turkeys ] ) ] we have not been able to reproduce such structure . anyway , it is erased when integrating over @xmath8 to get @xmath304 . we now turn our attention to periodic potentials without spatial inversion symmetry . this feature combined with out - of - equilibrium conditions can give rise to directional motion with net unbiased driving ( _ ratchet effect _ ) . this directional motion has been invoked to explain the behaviour of molecular motors and , with the emergence of nanoscience , opens the way to build mesoscopic devices and engines based on it . the theoretical work has concentrated on the classical behaviour and in the high - damping regime @xcite . the few quantum studies also addressed strong system - bath coupling in two situations : semiclassical @xcite and a extreme quantum case disregarding thermal effects @xcite . an exception to the large @xmath17 studies is @xcite , but there the substrate potential ( and the force ) were treated perturbatively . here , we shall solve the quantum master equation ( [ wkk : dxp ] ) with the ( non - perturbative ) continued - fraction method for particles in ratchet potentials , taking into account finite damping ( @xmath305 non - negligible inertia ) . for the ratchet potential ( [ vrat ] ) , the fourier coefficients of @xmath306 are @xmath307 and @xmath308 ( recall the thermal scaling of @xmath309 ; section [ sec : wkk : scaled ] ) . we use @xmath310 , which smooths a small shoulder that this potential exhibits on the `` easy '' side ( figure [ fig : bands ] ) . as discussed before , the range of index coupling is @xmath150 , which gives a @xmath207-term recurrence . for the stationary response it can be written as [ cf.equation ( [ rr:3:cosine ] ) ] @xmath311 which can be folded onto a canonical @xmath71-term recurrence by introducing appropriate ( block ) vectors and matrices ( [ app : rr - cf ] ) . the potential considered is the minimal extension of the cosine potential lacking inversion symmetry , so that the average velocities can be different for positive and negative forces ( vd . figure [ fig : cl - ratchet ] ) . we excite the system with a square - wave force switching alternatively between @xmath312 , and compute the `` rectified '' current of particles @xmath313 here @xmath314 are the correponding stationary velocities since we consider adiabatic conditions ( @xmath315 ) . in what follows we briefly investigate the classical limit ( understudied for finite damping ) and then proceed to study quantum corrections . figure [ fig : cl - ratchet ] displays @xmath316 as a function of @xmath18 , showing the appearance of non - zero rectified velocities ( ratchet effect ) . the rectification is optimum at some intermediate temperature ( at too low @xmath18 there is hardly a response , and at too high @xmath18 the potential is irrelevant , so its asymmetry plays no rle in either case ) . at @xmath317 the results coindice with those obtainable from the analytical @xmath283 for overdamped classical particles ( * ? ? ? 11.3 ) ( vd . also @xcite ) @xmath318 with @xmath319/t$ ] . inertia , however , broadens the @xmath316 curves and shifts the maxima to higher @xmath18 ( for the lowest @xmath229 the maximum moves to a slightly lower @xmath18 ; vd . this broadening is accompanied by a slower decrease of @xmath316 with @xmath18 . this is consistent with the asymptotic behaviour of @xmath316 when @xmath320 @xcite . for overdamped particles it goes as @xmath321 , while for weak damping it decreases only with @xmath322 ( @xmath323 ) . we have checked that our results recover these dependences ( curves not shown due to the smallness of the asymptotic @xmath324 ) . ) with @xmath229 and @xmath230 . two forces are used @xmath325 ( left ) and @xmath326 ( right ) , to show the lack of symmetry in the response ( running part more developed to the easy side ) and the locked regions reflecting the potential profile . bottom left : rectified classical velocity vs. temperature for various values of the damping and force @xmath327 . right : @xmath328 vs. @xmath18 for the positive force . , title="fig : " ] ) with @xmath229 and @xmath230 . two forces are used @xmath325 ( left ) and @xmath326 ( right ) , to show the lack of symmetry in the response ( running part more developed to the easy side ) and the locked regions reflecting the potential profile . bottom left : rectified classical velocity vs. temperature for various values of the damping and force @xmath327 . right : @xmath328 vs. @xmath18 for the positive force . , title="fig : " ] in our case @xmath329 ( the `` retrapping '' force ; section [ sec : risken ] ) , so that at @xmath330 the attractors are locked solutions . then , the absolute @xmath328 vs. @xmath18 curves start from @xmath331 at @xmath330 , depart from zero as @xmath18 is increased and evolve towards @xmath332 for @xmath320 ( free damped particle ) . in the overdamped case this evolution is nearly a step , whereas the slope of the initial raising decreases with decreasing @xmath17 ( if @xmath238 ) . to understand this , let us assimilate @xmath283 to the escape rate @xmath333 ( modified by some mean free path ) , so that @xmath334 . kramers theory @xcite shows that @xmath335 increases monotonously with @xmath17 . therefore , the @xmath328 vs. @xmath18 curves for finite @xmath17 must lay ordered below the overdamped result . on the other hand , the maximum rectification occurs in the temperature region where @xmath328 transits from @xmath336 to @xmath249 . this intermediate region is narrower ( and the slopes steeper ) the higher the damping is ( figure [ fig : cl - ratchet ] ) , while the curves start to raise from zero at a lower @xmath18 . therefore , increasing the damping the @xmath337 curves will be narrower and the maxima shift to lower @xmath18 , as observed . eventually , this also allows to explain the anomalous curve showing the return ( @xmath229 ) . here @xmath338 , so that at @xmath330 the system starts close to the zone of bistability . then the particle can perform incursions into the running solution , increasing the initial slope of @xmath339 but now when the damping is lowered , shifting the maximum to a lower @xmath18 . after the mandatory exploration of the classical limit , we proceed to make the system quantal , by decreasing @xmath50 . figure [ fig : q - ratchet ] shows the rectified current with @xmath340 ( with @xmath341 bands below the barrier ; cf . figure [ fig : bands ] ) for various @xmath17 , together with the reference classical curves . we have set @xmath342 is all cases , to have roughly the same amount of locked and running components in the solutions . at high temperatures ( @xmath343 ) the classical and quantum curves coincide , as expected . however , decreasing @xmath18 down to @xmath344 , the ratchet effect gets reduced or enhanced , with respect to the classical result , depending on the dissipation . finally , at low temperatures ( @xmath345 ) the rectification is always reduced . with @xmath346 ( using @xmath342 ) for @xmath340 and the reference classical curve ( @xmath347 ) . the insets of @xmath348 and @xmath215 show enlargements of the peaks ( together with results for @xmath349 and @xmath350 ) . bottom right panel : kramers classical rate vs. @xmath17 at various forces ( from melnikov meshkov formula @xcite ) . the crosses mark the points with @xmath351 . , title="fig : " ] with @xmath346 ( using @xmath342 ) for @xmath340 and the reference classical curve ( @xmath347 ) . the insets of @xmath348 and @xmath215 show enlargements of the peaks ( together with results for @xmath349 and @xmath350 ) . bottom right panel : kramers classical rate vs. @xmath17 at various forces ( from melnikov meshkov formula @xcite ) . the crosses mark the points with @xmath351 . , title="fig : " ] with @xmath346 ( using @xmath342 ) for @xmath340 and the reference classical curve ( @xmath347 ) . the insets of @xmath348 and @xmath215 show enlargements of the peaks ( together with results for @xmath349 and @xmath350 ) . bottom right panel : kramers classical rate vs. @xmath17 at various forces ( from melnikov meshkov formula @xcite ) . the crosses mark the points with @xmath351 . , title="fig : " ] with @xmath346 ( using @xmath342 ) for @xmath340 and the reference classical curve ( @xmath347 ) . the insets of @xmath348 and @xmath215 show enlargements of the peaks ( together with results for @xmath349 and @xmath350 ) . bottom right panel : kramers classical rate vs. @xmath17 at various forces ( from melnikov meshkov formula @xcite ) . the crosses mark the points with @xmath351 . , title="fig : " ] to understand qualitatively the underlying physics we turn to some semiclassical results for various related problems . first , let us consider the _ reflection / transmission coefficient _ for an asymmetric saw - tooth potential @xcite . the results depend on the energy of the incident quantum particle . the reflection coefficient for energies higher than the barrier , @xmath352 , and the underbarrier transmission coefficient , @xmath353 , read @xmath354 % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % \;,\ ] ] where @xmath355 , @xmath356 are the slopes at both sides of the cusp , @xmath357 the particle energy , and @xmath358}$ ] . suppose now that we have an asymmetric potential , with an easy direction to the right , and we deform it with forces @xmath312 , computing the corresponding reflection coefficients @xmath359 and @xmath360 . for energies higher than the barrier , the above @xmath352 gives @xmath361 ( [ app : semicl ] ) . that is , _ overbarrier wave reflection _ is less intense when the slope of the potential is smaller . thus overbarrier transmission ( as thermal hopping ) is favoured along the easy direction for energies above the barrier @xcite . in contrast , using @xmath353 for energies below the barrier , we find @xmath362 , so that @xmath363 . that is , the reflection is more intense in the easy direction or , equivalently , tunnelling events are favoured in the hard direction @xcite . for a distribution of particle energies one would expect a competition between these two types of quantum effects . then , the enhancement of the rectified velocity under @xmath312 forcing for the @xmath348 curve follows from the increase of the thermal escape with @xmath17 in the intermediate - to - low damping range @xmath364 ( figure [ fig : q - ratchet ] ) . at that damping more escape events occur and the particles launched over the barrier are subjected to the discussed phenomenon of wave reflection , which favours net motion along the easy side and hence increases @xmath316 . lowering the damping , on the other hand , less escape events are produced and wave - reflection becomes progressively dominated by tunnel events ( favouring the hard direction ) . at @xmath344 one would expect the tunnel to be thermally assisted through the higher bands , which are wider . a simple estimation of channel probabilities comes from multiplying a band thermal population ( using kramers rate ) by the probability of tunnel ( given by the semiclassical transmission coefficient @xmath353 ) . here the exponential reduction of @xmath333 with @xmath357 compites with the exponential increase of @xmath353 for the upper bands ( [ app : semicl ] ) . at @xmath344 and for @xmath340 we find that tunnel is indeed favoured through the upper bands . to check that the behaviours found at the maxima are systematic , we increase @xmath50 to @xmath349 ( @xmath365 bands below the barrier ) and reduce it to @xmath366 ( @xmath291 bands ; here the temperatures around the peak are still inside the range of validity of the master equation , small @xmath26 ) . the results ( insets ) show clearly the tendency to amplify either the enhancement or the reduction when the system becomes more quantal . finally , at low temperatures ( @xmath367 ) thermal activation becomes ineficient for all dampings . then a reduction of the rectification is expected , due to dominance of below - barrier energies and hence of tunnel events ( through the lowest bands ) . note that the decrease of @xmath316 relative to the classical results is comparable in the curves shown . this suggests that we have similar crossover temperatures @xmath368 in this damping range . ( @xmath368 , below which quantum effects dominate , is useful as a measure of quantum corrections at a given @xmath18 ) . this quantity is known exactly in the problem of the escape from a `` quadratic - plus - cubic '' potential @xmath369 $ ] ( * ? ? ? 14 ) @xmath370 in our units @xmath371 and in the damping range studied the factor in brackets is close to one ( @xmath372 ) . this gives crossovers @xmath373 and hence comparable reductions of the ratchet effect , as observed . this reduction of the rectification is the precursor of the current reversals ( @xmath374 ) found in these systems when tunnelling completely dominates . although we find small @xmath374 in some cases , the results can not be fully trusted . for example , at @xmath348 , @xmath340 and @xmath375 we have @xmath376 , which is bordering the limits of validity of the quantum master equation employed here . we conclude with the study of the ( non - adiabatic ) dynamical response to oscillating forces @xmath377 . then , the coefficients of the expansion ( [ w : expansion : xp ] ) of the wigner function are periodic functions of @xmath46 , so they can be fourier expanded as follows : @xmath378 to lowest order in the probing field , the static part of the corresponding vectors [ equation ( [ dcdt : vectors : matrices : x ] ) ] obeys a recurrence relation of the type ( vd . [ app : pert : ac ] ) @xmath379 the equations for the harmonics have the form ( @xmath380 is the identity matrix ) @xmath381 % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % \;,\ ] ] with the `` forcing '' @xmath382 involving the previous order results . specifically , @xmath383 , with @xmath384 the part of @xmath385 corresponding to @xmath386 , namely @xmath387 % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % line-1 \sqrt{1}\,\etam\delta f \!&\ ! 0 \!&\ ! \sqrt{2}\,\etap\delta f \!&\ ! 0 \!&\ ! \ddots \\[0.ex ] % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % line-2 0 \!&\ ! \sqrt{2}\,\etam\delta f \!&\ ! 0 \!&\ ! \sqrt{3}\,\etap\delta f \!&\ ! \ddots \\[0.ex ] % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % line-3 0 \!&\ ! 0 \!&\ ! \sqrt{3}\,\etam\delta f \!&\ ! 0 \!&\ ! \ddots \\[0.ex ] % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % line-6 ( 4 ) \ddots \!&\ ! \ddots \!&\ ! \ddots \!&\ ! \ddots \!&\ ! \ddots \end{array } \right ) % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % \ ] ] [ vd . [ app : matrices ] for the general @xmath158 ; the @xmath384 actually entering in @xmath382 is divided by @xmath386 , cf . equations ( [ eom : generic ] ) and ( [ coefficients : a ] ) ] . equations ( [ 3rr : statics ] ) and ( [ 3rr : harmonics ] ) can be solved sequentially with the continued - fraction method . figure [ fig : suscep - w ] shows the linear susceptibility ( @xmath388 ) computed in this way for a particle in a _ cosine _ potential as a function of @xmath389 . ( here we return to safe ground because @xmath390@xmath391 ; for related dielectric and kerr relaxation curves of a quantum rotator vd . @xcite and references therein . ) for the largest damping the results correspond to the classical limit . there the line - shape @xmath392 broadens and extends to frequencies lower than the oscillation frequency near the bottom of the potential wells ( @xmath393 in our units ) . for low damping , this classical _ spreading of oscillation frequencies _ has an important contribution from the amplitude dependence of the period of oscillation in anharmonic potentials @xcite . this non - dissipative contribution to @xmath392 is also known in classical spin problems , where the precession frequency depends on @xmath394 due to the magnetic anisotropy @xcite . and @xmath395 with @xmath289 ( @xmath305 classical ) , @xmath396 and @xmath397 ( less to more peaked curves ) . left panel : real part . right panel : imaginary part ( dashed line , @xmath398 but halving @xmath399 ) . vertical lines : loci of the transition frequencies of the associated quadratic - plus - quartic anharmonic oscillator [ equation ( [ delta - pert - fey ] ) ] . , title="fig : " ] and @xmath395 with @xmath289 ( @xmath305 classical ) , @xmath396 and @xmath397 ( less to more peaked curves ) . left panel : real part . right panel : imaginary part ( dashed line , @xmath398 but halving @xmath399 ) . vertical lines : loci of the transition frequencies of the associated quadratic - plus - quartic anharmonic oscillator [ equation ( [ delta - pert - fey ] ) ] . , title="fig : " ] the quantum regime is approached by decreasing the kondo parameter @xmath400 [ equation ( [ kondos ] ) ] . reducing @xmath17 with a fixed @xmath50 we find that the @xmath401 curves develop a multipeaked structure . these peaks could be vaguely seen as the mentioned nonlinear oscillations becoming quantised . to give content to this statement , we investigate perturbatively the effect of the anharmonic terms of a cosine potential ( those beyond @xmath402 ) on the energy levels of the harmonic oscillator part . since the main contribution should come from the quartic term , we consider the potential @xmath403 . first - order perturbation theory gives the eigenvalues ( * ? ? ? 6.3 ) @xmath404 expanding the cosine potential @xmath405 , we identify @xmath406 and @xmath407 ( @xmath408 , soft anharmonicity ) . then we can compute the level spacing @xmath409 % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % \;,\ ] ] which has acquired a dependence on the level index @xmath410 absent in the harmonic case . the associated transition frequencies @xmath411 are plotted in figure [ fig : suscep - w ] [ scaled as @xmath412 . they agree well with the location of the main peaks of the quantum @xmath392 curves , supporting their relation with the nonlinearity of the potential . furthermore , the contribution from transitions between the higher levels should be reduced when they are less populated . decreasing @xmath18 , we indeed see that the corresponding peaks ( located at lower @xmath389 ) are substantially reduced . in the suggestive language of nonlinear oscillations we would say that lowering the temperature the large amplitude oscillations ( having longer period ) become less probable . the applicability of the quantum nonlinear oscillator picture is grounded on the flattness of the lowest bands at the @xmath50 considered , which are well approximated by constant levels ( vd.figure [ fig : bands ] ) . we have computed the semiclassical width of the bands in a cosine potential in [ app : semicl ] . an upper bound for the width [ equation ( [ wb : approx : top ] ) ] reads in dimensionless units @xmath413 $ ] , with @xmath414 the band mean energy relative to the potential amplitude . for moderate @xmath50 this bound gives in fact very flat bands , specially the deepest ones ( @xmath415 ) . this also implies that the width of the @xmath392 peaks has a negligible contribution from the intrinsic level width , being dominated by the damping and thermal broadening . traditionally , the continued - fraction method has been employed to solve fokker planck equations for few - variable classical systems ( translational and rotational problems ) . when compared with numerical simulations of the langevin equation , the method has several _ shortcomings _ : ( i ) it is quite specific of the problem to be solved ( one needs to recalculate the recurrence coefficients for each potential ) , ( ii ) its convergence and stability depend on the parameters of the problem ( and can be poor in some ranges ) , and ( iii ) it does not return `` trajectories '' , which in the simulations provide helpful insight . nevertheless , when the method can be used its _ advantages _ are most valuable : ( i ) it is free from statistical errors , ( ii ) is essentially nonperturbative , ( iii ) specially apt to get stationary solutions ( static and dynamic ) , ( iv ) high efficiency ( allowing to explore parameter ranges out of the reach of the simulation ) , and ( v ) it gives the distribution @xmath7 , which certainly compensates for the lack of trajectories . for these reasons , and the lack of quantum langevin simulations , it was worth to develope continued - fraction methods for quantum dissipative systems . this had been done for problems of spins in a thermal bath and in quantum nonlinear optics . in this article we have discussed in detail the adaptation of the continued - fraction method to tackle quantum master equations in phase - space problems , taking advantage of the parallels with the classical case provided by the wigner formalism . we have seen that the quantum extension of the continued - fraction method is more problem dependent ( except for polynomial potentials ) , due to the necessity of using the @xmath8-recurrence of the quantum hierarchies and finding suitable bases . nevertheless , it inherits from the classical methods most of the abovementioned advantages , in particular , the obtaining of the wigner function , from which any observable can be computed . furthermore , the eigenvalue spectrum of the system , although helpful in understanding the physics , is not necessarily required . this is advantageous when dealing with non - bounded hamiltonians , continuous spectra , etc . finally , by changing the appropriate quantum parameter , the connection with the classical results is attained in a natural way . note that `` continued - fraction '' is a quite generic term ( like `` series expansion '' ) , which can be found in many different contexts , and in particular in works dealing with quantum dissipative systems ( see , e.g. , @xcite and references therein ) . however , in those cases one usually obtains some continued - fraction expression for a certain quantity ( e.g. , the linear susceptibility , memory functions , etc . ) , whereas we have obtained the _ complete solution of the quantum master equation _ by continued - fraction methods . the approach allows to study the interplay of quantum phenomena , nonlinearity , thermal fluctuations , and dissipation in several classes of systems . this is important , because methods optimised for one of the sides ( e.g. , nonlinearity or quantal behaviour ) tend to perform poorly for the others ( e.g. , fluctuations or dissipation ) . in addition , the visualization of @xmath57 plus the knowledge of the classical phase - space structure ( orbits , separatrices , attractors , etc . ) can provide valuable insight in difficult problems . finally , the main limitations of the approach are those that the starting master equations may have . we have considered the celebrated caldeira leggett quantum master equation , but the method can be applied to a class of equations of this type , and to possible generalisations . we have implemented the method in the canonical problem of quantum brownian motion in periodic potentials . we have considered both the cosine and ratchet potentials . for the former we have recovered and extended a number of classic results and interpreted them on the basis of the wigner formalism . results for the dynamics under oscillating forcing have also been obtained , illustrating the modification of the nonlinear effect of spreading of oscillation frequencies by quantum phenomena . for particles in ratchet potentials we have studied , under adiabatic conditions , the effects of finite damping on the rectified velocity . taking into account the competition of thermal hopping , overbarrier wave reflection and tunnel events , together with semiclassical analytical results , has allowed us to understand in great detail the physics of these systems . this work was supported by dges , project bfm2002 - 00113 , and dga , grant no . b059/2003 . we acknowledge f. falo , j. j. mazo , and a. p. piazzolla for useful discussions and valuable inspiration . here we briefly discuss the solution of recurrence relations by continued - fraction methods . we first consider @xmath71-term recurrences and then differential recurrences , vector - matrix cases , folding of larger - coupling recursions into @xmath71-term ones , and the problem of the intial conditions . ( for a brief description of the relation of continued fractions , series expansions , recursions , and orthogonal polynomials see @xcite . ) suppose we have the simplest case of a @xmath71-term recurrence relation of the form @xmath416 with @xmath417 and @xmath418 given quantities . to obtain the @xmath19 one inserts in ( [ rr ] ) the anstze @xcite ( upper and lower signs for @xmath419 and @xmath420 ) @xmath421 getting the following ladder coefficients @xmath422 and shifts @xmath423 @xmath424 if the recurrence is finite or the @xmath19 decrease quickly with @xmath425 ( e.g. , when they are coefficients of some judiciosly chosen expansion ) , we can truncate at some large @xmath426 , by setting @xmath427 and @xmath428 . next we _ iterate downwards _ in ( [ s : a ] ) getting @xmath422 and @xmath423 , down to @xmath429 . then , to get the @xmath19 from ( [ c : risken : com ] ) , we need @xmath430 , which is obtained from @xmath431 combination of equation ( [ rr ] ) at @xmath429 and @xmath432 . thus , starting from @xmath430 , we _ iterate @xmath433 upwards _ , getting the solution of the recursion . for @xmath434 ( homogeneous recurrences ) , we have @xmath435 and the solution reads @xmath436 . note that @xmath422 is given in terms of @xmath437 in the denominator , which can in turn be written as a fraction with @xmath438 in the denominator , and so on . this has the structure of a _ continued fraction _ , naming the method @xmath439 the iterative solution can be cast into explicit form as a series of products of continued fractions @xcite . the above form , however , has the virtue of being easy to implement in a computer . convergence is checked increasing @xmath440 and repeating the procedure . solving equation ( [ rr ] ) in this way requires a computational effort of order @xmath441 , instead of the order @xmath442 of an arbitrary linear algebra problem . this reduction arises from the tridiagonal structure of the matrix associated to ( [ rr ] ) . ( for analytical inversion of tridiagonal matrices see @xcite and references therein . ) we can solve analogously a differential recurrence of the type @xmath443 laplace transformation converts this equation into [ @xmath444 @xmath445 % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % \;,\ ] ] where @xmath446 has been used . then , introducing @xmath447 and @xmath448 , the above equation has the structure of the ordinary recurrence ( [ rr ] ) . the quantities involved in the above recurrences need not to be scalars , but they can be @xmath449-vectors ( @xmath19 and @xmath418 ) and the coefficients @xmath417 are @xmath450-matrices . then we speak of _ matrix continued fractions_. the only change in the above solution is that the fraction bars then mean matrix inversion ( `` from the left '' , @xmath451 ) . this is important , because a recurrence relation involving more than three coefficients can be `` folded '' into a @xmath71-term recurrence by introducing vector and matrix quantities . let us show how to do so for the following @xmath207-term recursion @xmath452 defining the @xmath150vectors @xmath453 and the @xmath454matrices @xmath455 it can be easily seen that equation ( [ rr:5 ] ) for @xmath456 and @xmath457 is equivalent to @xmath458 then , insertion of @xmath459 gives the matrix version of ( [ s : a ] ) . note that the @xmath19 and @xmath418 can already be vectors and the @xmath417 matrices . then , the above @xmath460 , @xmath461 , and @xmath462 are `` block '' vectors and matrices . finally , to iterate upwards @xmath459 , the `` initial condition '' @xmath463 is obtained from the matrix version of ( [ condini ] ) ( which we write @xmath464 ) . as in the absence of forcing ( @xmath465 ) the general solution involves an overall multiplicative constant , one adds to this system an extra equation to fix it ( e.g. , a normalisation contidion on the coefficients ; vd . section [ sec : obs ] ) . alternatively , we can fix arbitrarily one element of @xmath463 and rescale the solution at the end . in either case , one has an extra equation which added to @xmath466 yields the extended @xmath467 system @xmath468\hline\\[-2.ex ] % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % \mbox{\,l.h.s.\ eq.\ , } \end{array } \right ) } \hspace{-0.5em } \begin{array}{c } \uparrow \\ { \scriptstyle ( j+1 ) } \\ \downarrow \end{array } % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % \quad % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % \mathbf{b}^{\ast } = \left ( \begin{array}{c } b_{1 } \\[-1.5ex ] \vdots \\[-1.5ex ] b_{j } % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % \\[0.ex]\hline\\[-2.5ex ] % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % \mathrm{\!\!r.h.s.\!\!\ ! } \end{array } \right ) % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % \ ] ] this system can be solved by any method appropriate for cases with more equations than unknowns ( e.g. , using @xmath469- or svd - decomposition @xcite ) , getting @xmath463 . here we derive @xmath470 , the @xmath85 transform of the operator @xmath13 in the master equation with @xmath471 $ ] [ equation ( [ w : expansion ] ) ] . we split @xmath470 as @xmath86 , with @xmath87 , @xmath88 , and @xmath89 given by ( [ wkk : lir : lkin : lv ] ) . for the `` product '' of operators we use that the transformation of the product is equal to the product of the transformations : @xmath472 which follows by sandwiching `` identities '' @xmath473 between the factors . besides , the multiplication by functions of @xmath1 commutes with @xmath85 , so that only the differential terms need to be transformed . from these two properties we see that _ only @xmath474 and @xmath475 need to be calculated _ ( and then raised to some power or multiplied ) . _ calculation of @xmath474_. in order to transform @xmath121 , we apply @xmath476 , to an arbitrary function @xmath477 . the @xmath10 dependent part of @xmath73 cancels out and we obtain @xmath478 which has the form of a `` displaced '' differential operator . _ calculation of @xmath475_. applying @xmath479 to a function @xmath480 , we similarly get @xmath475 : @xmath481 this @xmath475 can be expressed in terms of the following creation and annihilation operators @xmath482 thus , using the shifted @xmath78 parameters @xmath483 [ equation ( [ etam : etap ] ) ] we arrive at @xmath484 for @xmath107 ( the choice in the classical case ) , @xmath485 and @xmath486 , so that @xmath487 . using the product property @xmath489 , we have @xmath490 . then , replacing @xmath67 by its `` bar '' form ( [ ppb ] ) and writing @xmath491 [ from ( [ bm - bp ] ) ] , we find @xmath492 here we have also used @xmath493 and the commutation rule @xmath494=1 $ ] to get a _ normally ordered _ form . if we introduce some compact notation for the coefficients @xmath495 we can finally write @xmath496 ( the choice @xmath107 gives the self - adjoint form @xmath497 @xcite . ) using equations ( [ pxb ] ) and ( [ ppb ] ) for @xmath474 and @xmath475 , as well as @xmath491 and the definition ( [ dmdp ] ) of @xmath499 we get for the kinetic part @xmath500 : @xmath501 the coefficients of @xmath90 and @xmath91 are @xmath502 and @xmath503 , also defined in ( [ dmdp ] ) , and we have @xmath504 to obtain @xmath506 [ vd . equation ( [ wkk : lir : lkin : lv ] ) ] , we use the product property ( [ bar : product ] ) to raise @xmath475 to @xmath507 , getting @xmath508 to get later the matrix elements of @xmath94 between hermite functions it is convenient to cast ( [ lvb ] ) in a normally ordered form . to this end we use pathak s theorems @xcite in the following generalised form @xmath509 ! } \ ; \frac{(\etapro/2)^{q}}{q ! } \;.\ ] ] here @xmath510 with @xmath511 $ ] ( @xmath512 is the result of moving the @xmath513 to the left as if they were scalars ) . the generalisation resides in letting @xmath514 and @xmath513 have a constant but different from one commutator . in our case @xmath515=\etapro % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % \;,\ ] ] follows from the commutator @xmath494=1 $ ] with @xmath516 . note that @xmath514 and @xmath513 are not the adjoint of each other , but the notation is symbolic . with help from equation ( [ pathak:2:gral : odd : alt : rep ] ) and @xmath517 [ equation ( [ kappa : s ] ) ] we can write ( [ lvb ] ) as follows @xmath518 where we have introduced the notations @xmath519 ! } \frac{(\etapro/2)^{q}}{q ! } \bv^{(2\iq+1 ) } % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % \ ; , \qquad % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % \hat{x}^{\ell } = \nol\big(\aplus+\aminus\big)^{\ell}\nor % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % \;.\ ] ] for a given @xmath520 different powers of @xmath521 appear . we take a common factor @xmath522 and add coefficients , e.g. , @xmath523 with @xmath521 , @xmath524 , with @xmath525 , etc . @xmath526 for @xmath527 in @xmath528 we write @xmath529}=\px^{2q}\bv^{(2\ell+1)}$ ] and introduce the operator @xmath530 @xmath531 now the @xmath532 and @xmath533 dependences factorise , so we can sum the series of @xmath532 in @xmath534 , getting an exponential . then , recalling the definition of @xmath103 we finally obtain the normally ordered form for @xmath94 we were looking for @xmath535 the operator @xmath536 does not act on what could appear after @xmath15 , since @xmath530 was introduced as some abreviated notation for the high - order derivatives of the potential . here we calculate the matrix elements @xmath537 , with the transformed operator @xmath86 obtained in [ app : lb ] . we split in parts the calculation by introducing the corresponding decomposition : @xmath538 , @xmath539 , and @xmath540 , where we have used the custom `` bra''``ket '' notation . the calculation is simplified because we have all operators @xmath470 expressed as normally ordered forms of @xmath90 and @xmath91 . then we can take advantage of the ladder actions @xmath541 , @xmath542 , and the number property @xmath543 . from ( [ lirb ] ) for @xmath92 and the orthonormality of the @xmath545 , we find for @xmath546 @xmath547 then , we introduce the notation @xmath548 for the coefficient of the diagonal term [ cf.equation ( [ gammas ] ) ] , multiply by @xmath84 and sum over @xmath549 , getting @xmath550 using equation ( [ lkinb ] ) for @xmath93 and the `` ladder '' action of @xmath90 and @xmath91 , we have @xmath552 where we have used the kronecker delta to interchange @xmath113 and @xmath553 . then , multiplying by @xmath84 and summing over @xmath549 , one obtains @xmath554 this will take longer . first , the operator @xmath556 appearing in equation ( [ lvb : norord : el ] ) for @xmath94 can be put in explicit form by using the binomial formula @xmath557 the @xmath514 and @xmath513 are proportional to @xmath90 and @xmath91 [ equation ( [ am - ap ] ) ] , so the contribution of each summand to @xmath558 involves @xmath559 . from orthonormality only one term of the sum ( [ sum : pathak ] ) will contribute , namely @xmath560 , while @xmath561 will be odd , @xmath562 with @xmath563 ( reflecting the odd powers of @xmath67 in @xmath89 ) . then , in terms of @xmath520 , the index @xmath564 is restricted to @xmath565 [ [ relating - the - results - for - ippipmp2iq1 . ] ] relating the results for @xmath562 . + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + the two cases can be easily related . first , the combinatorial coefficients are equal @xmath566 , because @xmath567 . second , the @xmath78 factors , coming from the proportionality of the @xmath568 , to @xmath569 , are simply obtained from each other by exchanging pluses and minuses ( @xmath516 ) : @xmath570 third and last , the matrix elements are also relatable . for @xmath101 , we have @xmath571 , while for @xmath572 @xmath573 which is formally identical to the former by replacing @xmath574 and @xmath575 . thus , from now on we consider only the case @xmath101 ( factor @xmath576 ) . the result for @xmath572 , will be readily obtained from this by replacing @xmath577 from all these considerations , we can write the matrix elements of @xmath556 as @xmath578 where we omit a kronecker delta ensuring @xmath101 . the rest of the calculation consists of multiplying this by @xmath579 and sum over all @xmath533 to get @xmath580 [ equation ( [ lvb : norord : el ] ) ] . [ [ restrictions - on - the - sum - on - ell . ] ] restrictions on the sum on @xmath533 . + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + the contribution of the infinite sum ( [ lvb : norord : el ] ) to @xmath580 is fortunately cut - off . first , the lower index in @xmath581 should be positive and , introducing the shifted index @xmath582 , we obtain ( we rename @xmath583 at the end ) @xmath584 here we have already used that the sum is also cut - off from above at @xmath585 , since @xmath586 , for @xmath587 . on the other hand , for @xmath588 [ equation ( [ lvb : norord : el ] ) ] we have @xmath589 ! } ( -\ldb^{2}\px^{2})^{\ell } \frac{(-1)^{\iq}\ldb^{2\iq}}{(2\iq+1 ) ! } \bv^{(2\iq+1 ) } % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % \;.\ ] ] combining this with @xmath590 , gathering @xmath591 with @xmath592 to form the operator @xmath530 [ equation ( [ aqlq ] ) ] , and recalling the definition ( [ kappa : s ] ) of @xmath103 , we obtain @xmath593 ! } \ ; \big\langle\ip\big| ( \bp)^{(2\iq+1)+\ell}\bd^{\ell } \big|\ipp\big\rangle \ ; \frac{(-\dlpxx)^{\ell}}{\ell ! } \ ; \bv^{(2\iq+1 ) } % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % \;.\ ] ] note that the quotient of factorials equals @xmath594 , with the pochhammer symbol defined by ( * ? ? ? 13.5 ) @xmath595 [ [ computation - of - the - matrix - element . ] ] computation of the matrix element . + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + to conclude , we only need the matrix element @xmath596 in ( [ lvb : matele:1 ] ) . we first pass @xmath507 times the action of @xmath91 to @xmath597 by taking its adjoint @xmath90 and then we use repeteadly its downward ladder action , getting @xmath598 with @xmath101 . then , in terms of the pochhammer symbol ( [ pochhammer ] ) , we can write @xmath599 now , taking into account that the factor @xmath600 cancels that of @xmath601 and using the modified coefficient @xmath602 [ equation ( [ gamma : qcoeff ] ) ] , we arrive at @xmath603 \bv^{(2\iq+1 ) } % \;\delta_{\ip-(2\iq+1),\ipp } % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % \;.\ ] ] comparing with the series definition of the confluent hypergeometric ( kummer ) function @xmath102 ( * ? ? ? 13.6 ) we get @xmath604 \bv^{(2\iq+1 ) } % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % \quad % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % \kum(a , c\,;z ) = \sum_{\ell=0}^{\infty } \frac{(a)_{\ell}}{(c)_{\ell } } \frac{z^{\ell}}{\ell ! } % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % \;.\ ] ] the operator in front of @xmath76 is simply @xmath605 [ equation ( [ gamma : qcoeff ] ) ] , so that we can finally write @xmath606 note that @xmath607 is a polynomial because the first negative index cuts the upper pochhammer symbol . indeed the `` integer - plus - one '' second argument @xmath608 tells us that it is an associated laguerre polynomial ( * ? ? ? 13 ) @xmath609 in our case @xmath610 and @xmath611 , so that @xmath612 . [ [ final - expressions - for - sum_ippq_ipipprm - vec_ipp . ] ] final expressions for @xmath555 . + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + once we have computed @xmath613 , the matrix elements of @xmath94 , we multiply by @xmath84 and sum over @xmath549 ( i.e. , over @xmath520 ) , to get @xmath614 } \big [ \g_{\ip}^{\iq,- } \ , \bv^{(2\iq+1 ) } \big ] \ , \ec_{\ip-(2\iq+1 ) } % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % \;.\ ] ] note that this @xmath520-sum is restricted because @xmath615 . this yields the upper limit @xmath616 $ ] , with @xmath617 $ ] the integer part of @xmath618 . the contribution from @xmath619 is easily obtained recalling the transformation rules ( [ rule ] ) ( here the sum is not restricted ) @xmath620 \ , \ec_{\ip+(2\iq+1 ) } % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % \;,\ ] ] with @xmath621 given by ( [ gamma : qcoeff ] ) . we have enclosed into square brackets the action of the operators @xmath622 to recall that they only act on the @xmath8-dependence of the potential . for @xmath107 , the choice in the classical case , @xmath485 , @xmath486 , and @xmath623 . then , @xmath624 and @xmath625 , so that only the @xmath626 terms survive . the chain of equations then adquires an unbalanced structure ( like in the old hierarchies @xcite ) , which may result in a poor stability when the quantum terms are important . in constrast , @xmath214 gives @xmath627 , and hence the weight of the terms at both sides of @xmath113 ( @xmath305 above and below the diagonals in the matrices @xmath158 ) is similar , improving the stability when going into the deep quantum regime . for special @xmath78 and @xmath189 , the integrals @xmath628 and @xmath180 [ equation ( [ ial : knl ] ) ] appearing in the expressions ( [ j : ial : knl ] ) for the observables , are easily done . for @xmath107 , we simply have @xmath629 , @xmath630 , and @xmath631 . if @xmath632 ( i.e. , @xmath216 ) , we get @xmath633 . then the first moments reduce to @xmath634 ( normalisation ) and to @xmath635 and @xmath636 . in the general case , one can derive recurrences relating the @xmath180 with lower order ( in @xmath533 ) ones . thus , only @xmath637 is needed , which can be found analytically . concerning the @xmath628 , we mostly use @xmath216 , and hence @xmath633 . anyway , for periodic potentials one can derive recurrence relations for them which can also be solved by continued fractions . to get the recurrence for the @xmath180 we start from their definition ( [ ial : knl ] ) with index @xmath638 , express the last @xmath10 as @xmath491 [ equation ( [ bm - bp ] ) ] , and then use @xmath639 , getting @xmath640 this recurrence can be used to get the @xmath641 from the @xmath180 . we can get analytical expressions for the first few @xmath180 with help from the tabulated integral ( * ? ? ? * equation ( 7.374 - 4 ) ) @xmath642 for @xmath643 , we use this result with @xmath644 , obtaining @xmath645 although @xmath646 and @xmath647 can now be obtained from ( [ knl : rr ] ) , they can also be done with help from equation ( [ hermite : func : int:1 ] ) , getting : @xmath648 , @xmath649 , and @xmath650 for a general periodic potential we can derive a recurrence relation for the integrals @xmath651\,u_{\ix}(\x)$ ] [ equation ( [ ial : knl ] ) ] . we integrate by parts the expression for @xmath652 and use @xmath653 with @xmath654 , getting @xmath655 for a finite number of harmonics ( @xmath656 , if @xmath657 ) , the recurrence ( [ rr : ial : vper ] ) has a finite coupling range . for instance , for the ratchet potential ( [ vrat ] ) , we have @xmath307 and @xmath308 and the above recurrence reduces to @xmath658 % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % \ ; , \qquad % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % \epspott=\epspot\,\vo/2\kt % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % \;.\ ] ] with @xmath659 as input ( obtained numerically , e.g. , by simpson rule ( * ? ? ? * app . 2 ) ) , this recursion can be solved by continued fractions ( [ app : rr - cf ] ) . here we write expliticly the matrices @xmath158 for arbitrary periodic potentials . we shall give the results for a slightly generalised basis , obtained by shifting the origin of momenta by an amount @xmath660 [ cf.equation ( [ w : expansion : xp ] ) ] @xmath661 this momentum shift is convenient to `` catch '' solutions centred far from zero @xmath10 , where the ordinary basis would need many @xmath80 to reconstruct the distribution . ( a useful choice is , when generating a curve , to set @xmath662 of the precedent point . ) the momentum shift is handled as a change of variable @xmath663 . then , @xmath664 , but the term @xmath62 makes the force to enter in the combination ( scaled units ) @xmath665 as mentioned in section [ sec : vper ] , we extract the force @xmath187 from @xmath15 and set the auxiliary potential @xmath189 proportional to the periodic part @xmath77 . the @xmath158 are obtained by inserting the formulae for @xmath666 , and @xmath667_{\ix\ixp}$ ] [ equation ( [ dmdpvper : matr - elem ] ) ] , into the general matrices of section [ sec : mqbh ] . instead of giving a single expression , we write separately the matrices for @xmath668 and @xmath669 . the central matrix @xmath670 is determined by the terms involving @xmath671 , and reads @xmath672 % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % line-1 \sqrt{1}(\iu\,\dmi\ix\!-\!\etam\bfsh ) \!\!\!\!&\!\!\!\ ! \gammao_{1 } \!\!+\!\ ! \pshift\,\iu\ix \!\!\!\!&\!\!\!\ ! \sqrt{2}(\iu\,\dpl\ix\!-\!\etap\bfsh ) \!\!\!\!&\!\!\!\ ! \sqrt{2\cdot3}\ , \gammapp \!\!\!\!&\!\!\!\ ! 0 \!\!\!\!&\!\ ! \ddots \\[0.ex ] % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % line-2 \sqrt{1\cdot2}\ , \gammamm \!\!\!\!&\!\!\!\ ! \sqrt{2}(\iu\,\dmi\ix\!-\!\etam\bfsh ) \!\!\!\!&\!\!\!\ ! \gammao_{2 } \!\!+\!\ ! \pshift\,\iu\ix \!\!\!\!&\!\!\!\ ! \sqrt{3}(\iu\,\dpl\ix\!-\!\etap\bfsh ) \!\!\!\!&\!\!\!\ ! \sqrt{3\cdot4}\ , \gammapp \!\!\!\!&\!\ ! \ddots \\[0.ex ] % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % line-3 0 \!\!\!\!&\!\!\!\ ! \sqrt{2\cdot3}\ , \gammamm \!\!\!\!&\!\!\!\ ! \sqrt{3}(\iu\,\dmi\ix\!-\!\etam\bfsh ) \!\!\!\!&\!\!\!\ ! \gammao_{3 } \!\!+\!\ ! \pshift\,\iu\ix \!\!\!\!&\!\!\!\ ! \sqrt{4}(\iu\,\dpl\ix\!-\!\etap\bfsh ) \!\!\!\!&\!\ ! \ddots \\[0.ex ] % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % line-4 0 \!\!\!\!&\!\!\!\ ! 0 \!\!\!\!&\!\!\!\ ! \sqrt{3\cdot4}\ , \gammamm \!\!\!\!&\!\!\!\ ! \sqrt{4}(\iu\,\dmi\ix\!-\!\etam\bfsh ) \!\!\!\!&\!\!\!\ ! \gammao_{4 } \!\!+\!\ ! \pshift\,\iu\ix \!\!\!\!&\!\ ! \ddots \\[0.ex ] % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % line-6 ( 5 ) \ddots \!\!\!\!&\!\!\!\ ! \ddots \!\!\!\!&\!\!\!\ ! \ddots \!\!\!\!&\!\!\!\ ! \ddots \!\!\!\!&\!\!\!\ ! ! \ddots \end{array } \right ) % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % \ ] ] with @xmath673 and @xmath674 given by ( [ gammas ] ) , @xmath675 , and @xmath676 . here the periodic potential does not appear ; only @xmath187 enters in the matrices @xmath670 . besides , they do depend on the index @xmath131 ( cf . below ) . the matrices @xmath677 are determined by the terms involving @xmath678 in equation ( [ dmdpvper : matr - elem ] ) and read @xmath679 % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % line-1 \etam \gs_{1}^{0 } \!-\ ! \sqrt{1}\,\epspot \!\!\!&\!\!\ ! -\pshift\,\epspot \!\!\!&\!\!\ ! \etap \gs_{2}^{0 } \!-\ ! \sqrt{2}\,\epspot \!\!\!&\!\!\ ! 0 \!\!\!&\!\!\ ! \etap^{3 } \gs_{4}^{1 } \!\!\!&\!\!\ ! 0 \!\!\!&\!\!\ ! \ddots \\[0.ex ] % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % line-2 0 \!\!\!&\!\!\ ! \etam \gs_{2}^{0 } \!-\ ! ! -\pshift\,\epspot \!\!\!&\!\!\ ! \etap \gs_{3}^{0 } \!-\ ! \sqrt{3}\,\epspot \!\!\!&\!\!\ ! 0 \!\!\!&\!\!\ ! \etap^{3 } \gs_{5}^{1 } \!\!\!&\!\!\ ! \ddots \\[0.ex ] % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % line-3 \etam^{3 } \gs_{3}^{1 } \!\!\!&\!\!\ ! 0 \!\!\!&\!\!\ ! \etam \gs_{3}^{0 } \!-\ ! \sqrt{3}\,\epspot \!\!\!&\!\!\ ! -\pshift\,\epspot \!\!\!&\!\!\ ! \etap \gs_{4}^{0 } \!-\ ! \sqrt{4}\,\epspot \!\!\!&\!\!\ ! 0 \!\!\!&\!\!\ ! \ddots \\[0.ex ] % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % line-4 0 \!\!\!&\!\!\ ! \etam^{3 } \gs_{4}^{1 } \!\!\!&\!\!\ ! 0 \!\!\!&\!\!\ ! \etam \gs_{4}^{0 } \!-\ ! \sqrt{4}\,\epspot \!\!\!&\!\!\ ! -\pshift\,\epspot \!\!\!&\!\!\ ! \etap \gs_{5}^{0 } \!-\ ! \sqrt{5}\,\epspot \!\!\!&\!\!\ ! \ddots \\[0.ex ] % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % line-5 \etam^{5 } \gs_{5}^{2 } \!\!\!&\!\!\ ! 0 \!\!\!&\!\!\ ! \etam^{3 } \gs_{5}^{1 } \!\!\!&\!\!\ ! 0 \!\!\!&\!\!\ ! \etam \gs_{5}^{0 } \!-\ ! \sqrt{5}\,\epspot \!\!\!&\!\!\ ! -\pshift\,\epspot \!\!\!&\!\!\ ! \ddots \\[0.ex ] % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % line-6 \ddots \!\!\!&\!\!\ ! \ddots \!\!\!&\!\!\ ! \ddots \!\!\!&\!\!\ ! \ddots \!\!\!&\!\!\ ! \ddots \!\!\!&\!\!\ ! ! \ddots \end{array } \right ) % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % \ ] ] where @xmath211 is evaluated at @xmath680 , with @xmath516 . these matrices enjoy properties opposite to those of @xmath670 . the substrate potential does appear ( multiplying all elements in front of the matrices ) while the force is absent . besides , the matrices @xmath677 are independent of the index @xmath131 , which permits to write them simply as @xmath681 . the only technical complication with respect to the common choice @xmath107 is that we need to compute the kummer functions @xmath102 included in @xmath211 , which in our case are simple polynomials [ equation ( [ assoc : laguerre : poly : kummer ] ) ] . note that to compute the observables we must eventually undo the momentum shift @xmath682 . in this appendix we derive some semiclassical formulae discussed in the main text . in section [ ratqbm ] we invoked the current through a saw - tooth barrier deformed by @xmath683 ( figure [ fig : saw - width ] ) . ( b ) and by @xmath684 ( c ) . right panel : width of the energy bands @xmath685 in a cosine potential ( exact and various approximations ) . , title="fig : " ] ( b ) and by @xmath684 ( c ) . right panel : width of the energy bands @xmath685 in a cosine potential ( exact and various approximations ) . , title="fig : " ] we introduced the reflexion coefficients @xmath359 and @xmath360 for @xmath312 . one has to analyse separately the cases of incident particles with energies above or below the barrier . in the first case , the reflexion coefficient by a potential with a cusp ( with slopes @xmath355 and @xmath356 ) is given by the first equation ( [ rs ] ) @xcite . owing to the right slope in figure [ fig : saw - width ] is infinity , we make it finite and finally take the vertical limit , getting @xmath686 next we consider the case of tunnelling through the barrier . the semiclassical transmission coefficient is also written in ( [ rs ] ) . defining @xmath687 , we calculate @xmath688 and @xmath689 for positive and negative forces . after simple integrals , we find @xmath690 with @xmath357 the particle energy ( cf . reference @xcite ) . for moderate forces , @xmath691 , we get for the transmission coefficients @xmath692 $ ] @xmath693 thus , for @xmath357 below the barrier @xmath363 , while @xmath361 for @xmath357 above the barrier . in order to get the semiclassical transmision coefficient through a potential @xmath405 , we need to do the integral @xmath694 } \big| % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % \;,\ ] ] with turning points obeying @xmath695 . due to @xmath696 below the barrier , we change the sign inside the square root extracting an @xmath697 which is absorbed by the modulus . simple tranformations bring the integral into a tabulated form ( * ? ? ? * equation ( 2.576 ) ) , and we obtain @xmath698 % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % \ ; , \qquad % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % \varepsilon = e/\vo \ ; , \quad s=\sqrt{\half(1-\varepsilon ) } % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % \;,\ ] ] where @xmath699 while @xmath700 and @xmath701 the first and second complete elliptic integrals ( * ? ? ? insertion in @xmath692 $ ] gives the transmision coefficient through a cosine potential . this @xmath353 also gives the _ semiclassical energy bands _ @xcite @xmath702 with @xmath703 the oscillation frequency in the wells . the width of the bands is therefore @xmath704 \big\ } % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % \ ; , \qquad % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % \varepsilon = e/\vo % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % \;.\ ] ] the parameter @xmath705 goes from @xmath202 when @xmath706 ( potential bottom ) to @xmath336 at the barrier top @xmath707 . for @xmath708 we can expand the elliptic integrals , getting @xmath709 \big\ } \nonumber\\ % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % & + ( 1+\varepsilon)^{2 } \big\ { 1 + \case{1}{8 } \ln \big [ \case{1}{32 } ( 1+\varepsilon ) \big ] \big\ } \big ) \big ] % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % \;.\end{aligned}\ ] ] at the potential bottom @xmath706 this gives @xmath710 $ ] . the band width increases exponentially with the energy . near the top , @xmath711 , one has @xmath712 , and we can use the series expansion of the elliptic integrals , obtaining @xmath713 % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % \;.\ ] ] figure [ fig : saw - width ] shows that equations ( [ wb : approx : bottom ] ) and ( [ wb : approx : top ] ) approximate well the exact results in their respective ranges ( the later also serves as un upper bound ) . if we disregard the terms with @xmath714 in ( [ wb : approx : bottom ] ) , the result happens to fit remarkably @xmath685 in all the range . in this last appendix we shall solve the following generic differential equation @xmath715 perturbatively in the forcing @xmath716 . ( for cosine forcing @xmath717 . ) comparing with section [ sec : dynamics ] , we see that @xmath718 corresponds to the vectors @xmath719 , @xmath720 to the static part of the matrices @xmath158 , and the perturbation @xmath721 to @xmath722 , the part of @xmath670 involving @xmath386 . a periodic solution can be fourier expanded as @xmath723 with @xmath724 the unperturbed response , while @xmath725 for complex @xmath718 . separating terms oscillating with @xmath726 and @xmath727 , the left - hand side of ( [ eom : generic ] ) reads @xmath728 \e^{+\iu\omega_{\iw } t } \\ % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % & + & \sum_{\iw=1}^{\infty } \dfm^{\iw}\ , \big [ -\iu(\omega_{\iw}\tau)\tilde{\ec}^{(\iw ) } + \rel\,\tilde{\ec}^{(\iw ) } \big ] \e^{-\iu\omega_{\iw } t } % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % \;.\end{aligned}\ ] ] to obtain the right - hand side , we use @xmath729 , redefine the indices ( keeping the same names ) to get all the oscillating factors at @xmath730 , and introduce the definition @xmath731 , arriving at @xmath732 \e^{+\iu\omega_{\iw } t } \\ % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % & + & \sum_{\iw=1}^{\infty } \dfm^{\iw } \big [ \vpert\,\tilde{\ec}^{(\iw-1 ) } + \left(\dfp\dfm\right ) \vpert\,\tilde{\ec}^{(\iw+1 ) } \big ] \e^{-\iu\omega_{\iw } t } % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % \;.\end{aligned}\ ] ] equating terms with the same oscillating factors at both hand sides ( _ uniqueness _ of the fourier expansion ) , we obtain @xmath733 \\[1.ex ] % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % \iu(\omega_{\iw}\tau)\ec^{(\iw ) } + \rel\,\ec^{(\iw ) } & = & \vpert\ , \big[\ ; \ec^{(\iw-1 ) } & + & \left(\dfp\dfm\right ) \ec^{(\iw+1 ) } \big ] % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % \end{array } % \;,\ ] ] the @xmath734 are included as @xmath735 with @xmath736 . the contribution @xmath737 comes from products of rotating " terms @xmath738 . for instance , the oscillating factor @xmath739 in @xmath740 when multiplied by the part @xmath741 of the field raises the harmonic from @xmath742 to @xmath743 . the term @xmath744 comes from products of counter - rotating " terms @xmath745 . for example , the product of the oscillating factor @xmath746 and the @xmath747 part of the field lowers the order from @xmath748 to @xmath743 . this contribution ( the contamination " from higher harmonics ) has an order higher in @xmath716 than the contribution of @xmath740 , which is therefore the leading one . indeed , expanding the @xmath749 in powers of @xmath716 we get the leading terms at each harmonic @xmath750 the @xmath751 equation gives the static response [ corresponding to ( [ 3rr : statics ] ) ] , @xmath388 the linear dynamical response , etc . [ corresponding to equation ( [ 3rr : harmonics ] ) ] . Abstract:

Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.

Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered . Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video . Paper: one of the most important developments in the field of interstellar gas dynamics during the last half - century was the renewed perception that most processes and structures are strongly affected by turbulence . this is a paradigm shift unparalleled in many other fields of astronomy , comparable perhaps to the discovery of extrasolar planets and cosmological structure at high redshift . interstellar turbulence and its implications were commonly discussed in the 1950s , but without the range of observations that are available today , the theory of the interstellar medium ( ism ) drifted toward increasingly detailed models based largely on a preference for thermal and dynamical equilibria . standing apart were two subfields that continued to include turbulence as the primary driver of all observations : radio scintillation and cosmic ray transport . the connections between these subfields and the prevailing picture of the ism were mostly ignored because of the large discrepancy in scales . consequently , two other small - scale processes got lost in the equilibrium paradigm of the large - scale models : mixing of the elements and molecular chemistry . in this review , we discuss these four subfields in some detail . all have a well - established observational base going back several decades , but because of the complexity of turbulence and the infancy of the relevant theory , all of them are now in a state of rapid evolution . our previous review _ interstellar turbulence i _ ( this volume ) , emphasized observations in the dense neutral ism and discussed in detail the various theoretical approaches to this field . the degree to which turbulence and other transport processes mix or homogenize the gas in the face of repeated local pollutions by supernovae and other sources of fresh metals could provide an important constraint on the hydrodynamics of the ism . this general problem is called passive scalar turbulence because the particles being transported have no effect on the velocity field . a review of experiments involving incompressible turbulent scalar transport can be found in warhaft ( 2000 ) , who emphasized that passive scalar probability density functions ( pdfs ) usually have strong exponential tails . a review focussing on a particular class of theoretical approaches has been given by falkovich , gawedzki & vergassola ( 2001 ) , whereas reviews of methods to calculate the concentration pdf and its moments are in dopazo ( 1994 ) and obrien ( 1980 ) . briefer and more specialized treatments can be found in shraiman & siggia ( 2000 ) and pope ( 2000 , section 12.4 ) . here we summarize observations of abundance variations in stars and gas , and we review recent theoretical work on interstellar turbulent mixing . we do not discuss star - to - star variations in globular clusters that may be affected by stellar evolution ( yong et al . 2003 ) . recent observations of metallicity dispersions in stars of the same age and in interstellar gas suggest that the ism is very well mixed on average , with typical fluctuations about the mean of only 520% . this low value is a challenge to explain considering the spotty pollution of new elements from supernovae and other sources . in addition , there are much larger observed fluctuations in a few places , suggesting the overall distribution function for abundance has a long , non - gaussian tail . both the low dispersion and the long tail might be explained by interstellar turbulence . stars of a similar age have often shown large variations in metallicity ( a term usually referring to iron abundance relative to the sun ) . for example , edvardsson et al . ( 1993 ) and chen et al . ( 2000 ) found factor - of - four abundance variations in several elements for f and g main sequence stars . after correcting for selection effects , edvardsson et al . estimated that the dispersion at a given age is about 0.15 to 0.20 dex , i.e. , 4060% , whereas garnett & kobulnicky ( 2000 ) suggested it is smaller than 0.15 dex for the same sample . a large unbiased sample of over 550 hipparcos stars with homogeneous chromospheric age estimates and photometric metallicities showed a dispersion at a given age of only 0.13 dex ( rocha - pinto et al . reddy et al . ( 2003 ) studied 27 elements in 181 f and g stars and found a dispersion at a given age that is somewhat smaller than in edvardsson et al . ( 1993 ) and chen et al . feltzing & gonzales ( 2001 ) used an inhomogeneous sample of 5828 stars and found a larger scatter in the metallicity at a given age of 0.2 to 0.3 dex , which exceeds the observational errors . a major problem is that the ages of the stars used in these studies have large uncertainties . considering that the stellar orbits probably migrated and led to additional abundance variations from galactic radial gradients ( e.g. , wielen et al . 1996 ) , the stellar results are consistent with a dispersion in the gas of 2030% or less , the upper limit set by uncertainties inherent in field star samples . other evidence for homogeneity among field stars comes from elemental abundance ratios . reddy et al . ( 2003 ) estimated the intrinsic scatter in the ratio [ x / fe ] for element x by fitting a gaussian curve to the histogram of deviations between [ x / fe ] and the linear fit of [ x / fe ] versus [ fe / h ] . the standard deviations in the gaussian for 26 elements in 181 stars varied between 0.03 and 0.10 dex . these deviations are comparable to the errors , so the result is an upper limit to the intrinsic scatter . it does not depend on stellar age , as do the absolute abundances . reddy et al . noted that because the elements come in differing proportions from different sites of stellar nucleosynthesis , the lack of scatter implies all the ejecta were well - mixed in the gas before the stars formed . abundance fluctuations of 0.050.15 dex had also been found in studies of open clusters ( e.g. , friel & boesgaard 1992 , twarog et al . 1997 , carraro et al . 1998 ) , b stars in star - forming regions ( e.g. , cunha & lambert 1994 ) and clusters ( rolleston et al . 1994 ) , the magellanic clouds ( e.g. , olszewski et al . 1991 ) , the interstellar medium ( meyer et al . 1998 ) , galactic _ regions ( deharveng et al . 2000 ) , and _ h ii _ regions in disk ( see review in henry & worthey 1999 ) and dwarf irregular ( e.g. , thuan et al . 1995 ) galaxies . however , f stars in nearby open clusters ( friel & boesgaard 1992 and references therein ) show no evidence for star - to - star abundance variations at the level of detectability . cluster - to - cluster variations are also small , including clusters of all ages , and essentially zero ( less than 1020% ) for the four clusters younger than @xmath0 years . the latter result implies that the ism is mixed , at least to this level , for scales between @xmath11 pc ( the size of the clumps from which clusters form ) and @xmath1100 pc ( the distances between clusters ) on a timescale less than @xmath0 years . even more stringent constraints were found from the photometric metallicity study of 76 clusters by twarog et al . comparison of high - precision photometry with stellar evolution models suggested a metallicity spread less than @xmath10.03 dex in the hyades cluster ( quillen 2002 ) . paulson , sneden & cochran ( 2003 ) derived the same small [ fe / h ] spread , excluding three outlier stars , using spectroscopic abundance determinations for individual stars . these results imply fluctuations of less than @xmath17% in the gas from which the hyades cluster formed . interstellar absorption studies suggest equally low dispersions . meyer et al . ( 1998 ) , moos et al.(2002 ) , and andre et al . ( 2003 ) found oxygen abundance dispersions over distances of around one kpc that are only a few percent . a recent study of interstellar kr / h by cartledge , meyer & lauroesch ( 2003 ) found a spread about the mean of only 0.06 dex for lines of sight within the local orion spur ; this was less than the measurement error . we conclude that the most recent evidence , based on field stars of a given age , cluster stars , and the ism , suggests a metallicity dispersion that is very small , less than 20 to 30% and perhaps as small as a few percent . this small galactic dispersion is consistent with the study of 41 _ h ii _ regions in m101 by kennicutt & garnett ( 1996 ) . there are notable exceptions , though , including : ( _ a _ ) the existence of old super - metal - rich stars ( e.g. , feltzing & gonzalez 2001 ) , and a large range in abundance ratios among metal - poor stars ( fields et al . 2002 ) ; ( _ b _ ) the lack of an age - metallicity relation for five nearby clusters , which led boesgaard ( 1989 ) to conclude that local abundance fluctuations of @xmath10.20.3 dex must persist for at least @xmath2@xmath3 years ( but see friel & boesgaard 1992 for a revised result ) ; ( _ c _ ) the factor of 2 to 3 fluctuations in [ o / h ] among subgroups in orion ( cunha & lambert 1994 ) , which , however , may be a result of self - pollution ; ( _ d _ ) the study of b stars in several clusters at galactocentric distance @xmath113 kpc that indicates one cluster has [ fe / h ] larger than the rest by a factor of @xmath15 ( rolleston , dufton & fitzsimmons 1994 ) , ( _ e _ ) two stars in the carina nebula ( andre et al . 2003 ) that are separated by only a few hundred parsecs but have line - of - sight oxygen abundances different by about 40% , and ( _ f _ ) outlier stars in the cluster studies discussed earlier . these examples suggest a metallicity pdf with a small variance and possibly large higher moments , i.e. , a fat tail at large metallicities . such a pdf is similar to that found for the pdf of passive scalars in incompressible turbulence ( warhaft 2000 ) . the analogous pdf for a compressible , magnetic , and self - gravitating ism is unknown . theoretical investigations of abundance fluctuations have until recently nearly all been based on order of magnitude arguments involving characteristic spatial scales and timescales for various processes . two of the more thorough discussions are in roy & kunth ( 1995 ) and tenorio - tagle ( 1996 ) . regarding spatial scales , elmegreen ( 1998 ) pointed out that for a hierarchically structured ism with star formation operating on a local dynamical time , the size of an o and b star association is usually larger than the supernovae remnants it produces . unless there is some immediate mixing , as in hot ionized or evaporating flows , the new elements should be spotty and variable for subsequent generations of stars ( self - enrichment ) . the point about timescales was highlighted by reeves ( 1972 ) : the mean time for a gas element to get reincorporated into a star is shorter than the time for its dispersal by supernova mixing , so abundance fluctuations should be large . both results contradict the apparent uniformity of abundances inside and between clusters and in the general ism . estimates for mixing times have changed since reeves ( 1972 ) paper . edmunds ( 1975 ) found that the timescale for mixing of gas by turbulence and galactic shear is relatively short compared with the star formation time , provided the sources of metals do not cluster together making the dispersion more difficult ( kaufman 1975 ) . bateman & larson ( 1993 ) also derived a short mixing time , considering diffusion by cloud motions , as did roy & kunth ( 1995 ) , who applied the diffusion approximation to galactic shear , radial flows , turbulent diffusion , supernovae , and gas instabilities . similarly short timescales can be derived using structure functions by considering the separation of initially nearby lagrangian fluid particles ( frisch 1995 ) . this latter procedure is often used to derive the richardson 4/3 law of superdiffusive incompressible turbulence . the implication of these short mixing times is that the ism should be homogeneous . the expectation of large spatial fluctuations may be viewed in a different way too , by considering the number of overlapping regions of contamination . edmunds ( 1975 ) showed that @xmath4 supernovae in a local volume should lead to inhomogeneities of order @xmath5 if there is no subsequent mixing . adopting an average of @xmath6 , he suggested that fluctuations would be relatively small . more detailed models for overlapping contaminations were studied by roy & kunth ( 1995 ) , argast et al . ( 2000 ) and oey ( 2000 ) . oey ( 2003 ) used turbulent dispersal from bateman & larson ( 1993 ) to enlarge the effective sizes and reduce the average metallicities in the overlapping regions . low metallicity stars and galaxies should have large metallicity dispersions because the numbers of contaminating events are small ( audouze & silk 1995 ) . a problem with most of the timescale arguments is that they apply to turbulent transport and not homogenization . moving clouds around or shredding them with fluid instabilities does not homogenize the gas at the atomic level or change the frequency distribution of abundance concentrations ; viscosity and molecular diffusion are required for that . the same is true for incompressible turbulence imagined as a cascade of vortices . unless the advection process creates steep gradients on small scales , molecular diffusion can not occur in a reasonable time . the situation changes when there are large - scale gradients in the mean concentration ; then advection from distant regions can change the concentration distribution locally ( see equation [ eq : zave ] below ) . even so , homogenization requires molecular diffusion . thus , a small transport time in the ism does not imply the gas will homogenize enough to remove abundance differences before it forms stars and clusters . the size and placement of each protostellar core within the complex spatial pattern of abundance fluctuations will determine its metallicity . releasing metals into the interstellar turbulent gas is similar in basic respects to dropping a blob of ink into a turbulent fluid . figure [ fig : mix ] shows such a release into a two - dimensional ( 2d ) incompressible forced chaotic velocity field ( jullien et al . advection spreads the scalar out in space , while concentrating it locally through stretching and folding , shearing it into thin ribbons until the spatial gradients are large enough that molecular diffusion becomes significant in the third frame . by the final frame , diffusion has smeared out most of the striated structures . how does turbulence deliver gradients to small enough scales for molecular diffusion to cause homogenization in a reasonable time ? de avillez & mac low ( 2002 ) found a surprisingly long timescale for the decay of the variance in a passive scalar field that had an initial checkerboard pattern and was mixed by supernovae . their time scaled to a galaxy ( at least a few times @xmath2 years ) is larger than previous estimates and still is a lower limit because they did not include sources of new metals . de avillez & mac low also found that the mixing time is independent of the mixing length , unlike mixing modeled as diffusion , and that the mixing time decreases with increasing supernova rate as a result of the increased velocities . there may be ways other than turbulence to get gradients on small enough scales for molecular diffusion to homogenize . in tenorio - tagle s ( 1996 ) `` fountain with a spray '' model , metal - rich droplets falling onto the disk are subject to rayleigh - taylor instabilities that reduce their size even further ; diffusion will be very effective in such a situation . there are many methods for studying passive scalar turbulent transport . here we describe two approaches : prescribed artificial velocity fields and closure methods for studying restricted properties of turbulent transport . most of what is known about passive scalar turbulence comes from models using an idealized velocity field that is not a rigorous solution to the hydrodynamics equations ( see review by falkovich et al . an example would be a time - uncorrelated velocity field with gaussian statistics , a prescribed spatial correlation function , and a constraint of incompressibility . this is called a kraichnan velocity field ( e.g. , shraiman & siggia 2000 ) . the advantages of such a field are that the equations for the concentration field and its statistical properties can in some cases be solved analytically without a closure assumption , and the generic properties of the result might be valid for any velocity field that has the same variance and conservation constraints . however , there is a large danger in assuming a delta function for the time correlation function . large intermittency in the velocity gradient field means that a large fraction of the fluid contains large gradients compared with a gaussian . in incompressible turbulence ( and the ism see _ interstellar turbulence i _ ) , this fraction gets larger on smaller scales . this implies that intermittency should homogenize the gas faster than purely gaussian motions , because molecular diffusion depends on large velocity gradients at small scales . decamp & le bourlot ( 2002 ) used another model velocity field that was obtained from a wavelet reconstruction with statistical properties similar to the ism velocity field , including motions correlated in space and time . they solved the continuity equations and showed that the correlated velocity field has a faster dispersion and a larger standard deviation for passive scalars ( by factors of 2 to 4 ) than an uncorrelated gaussian velocity field . the spatial distributions for species undergoing chemical reactions were also different , suggesting a mechanism for molecular segregation in dense clouds ( section [ sect : chem ] ) . further work on turbulent mixing using synthetic velocity fields is in elliott & majda ( 1996 ) , fung & vassilicos ( 1998 ) , and boffetta et al . ( 1999 ) . for some purposes , it may be sufficient to understand how the mean , variance , and skewness of a metallicity distribution depend on the source terms and large - scale gradients . this is the moment approach , and it has the advantage that some of its results can be obtained analytically . the moment approach might explain , for example , why there is an inverse square root scaling on the supernova rate for the decay timescale of the abundance variance ( de avillez & mac low 2002 ) . the evolution equation for the one - point probability distribution of metallicities was derived rigorously for incompressible turbulence by dopazo , valino & fueyo ( 1997 ) , who also derived the moment equations for incompressible flow ( see also obrien 1980 ; chen & kollman 1994 ; dopazo 1994 ; pope 1994 , 2000 ) . perhaps the simplest question that can be asked about scalar turbulence concerns the way in which the average relative concentration @xmath7 of a local patch of contaminant ( relative to hydrogen , for example ) will spread in space as a function of time . the usual place to start is to examine the mean square distance , @xmath8 , traveled by a marked lagrangian fluid particle . this distance can be related to an integral over the lagrangian correlation function , assuming only statistically stationary and isotropic turbulence . without knowing the correlation function , however , this relation is of little use . an approximation is to use the fact that the correlation is unity at time zero and approaches zero for large separations . then for times much smaller than the correlation time @xmath9 , @xmath10 whereas at @xmath11 , @xmath12 . here , @xmath13 is the two - time correlation function at a given point in the flow for lag @xmath14 ; i.e. , @xmath15 for flow speed @xmath16 and the average @xmath17 is over all pairs of points separated by @xmath14 . normalization to the variance , @xmath18 , makes @xmath13 dimensionless with values between @xmath19 and @xmath20 . in this formulation , the particle behaves ballistically at short times and has an uncorrelated random walk at large times . these results are usually referred to as taylor s theorem ( taylor 1921 ; see mccomb 1990 ; pope 2000 ) . the result is important for illustrating the nature of turbulence as a correlated random walk and the analogy between turbulent and molecular diffusion , where in the latter case @xmath21 would be the mean collision time . klessen & lin ( 2003 ) recently showed that taylor s theorem is correct in 3d - compressible turbulence . mccomb ( 1990 ) , piterbarg & ostrovskii ( 1997 ) and others have pointed out that taylor s theorem does not solve the problem of turbulent dispersal and transport , even for the mean field because what is required is information in the lab frame , not following the particle . klessen & lin ( 2003 ) suggest that the result can be used to develop a phenomenological mixing - length or diffusion model for turbulent transport in the ism in which the integral correlation time is related to the mean time between shock passages . another fundamental relationship is richardson s law ( richardson 1926 ) for the rate at which pairs of points separate in space in the inertial range of turbulence . one form of this law states that the time dependence of the rms separation is @xmath22 ( falkovich et al . 2001 , boffetta & sokolov 2002 , nicolleau & vassilicos 2003 ) . work on pair dispersion using synthetic velocity fields has resulted in at least two important insights : ( _ a _ ) the dynamics of particle pairs is sensitive to initial conditions but their rms separation increases algebraically , not exponentially ( unlike low - dimensional chaotic systems ) . ( _ b _ ) particle pairs travel together for long times and then separate explosively when they encounter straining regions around hyperbolic points in the flow ( e.g. , nicolleau & vassilicos 2003 ) . a traditional approach that could be applied to the spreading of newly produced elements from sources in the ism is to ignore the detailed dynamics and use an equation for the evolution of the mean concentration field alone . in general , the concentration @xmath23 of an element evolves in a given velocity field @xmath24 as @xmath25 where @xmath26 is the mass diffusivity and @xmath27 is the rate at which sources inject the element . the second term on the left represents the effect of the turbulent velocity field in advecting the concentration field . for the interstellar medium this velocity field will consist of complex compressions and vortical motions . the first term on the right represents molecular diffusion , which operates only on small scales in regions where the gradient of the concentration field is large . this equation illustrates how turbulent advection of a passive scalar spreads it out in space while increasing the local gradients through stretching , compressing , and folding . molecular diffusion then operates where the gradients are high . timescales for molecular diffusion have been discussed recently by oey ( 2003 ) for a uniform gas . the result is sensitive to temperature , so most of the homogenization of elements in the ism may occur in the hot regions , like superbubbles ( silich et al . 2001 ) , as well as those with the steepest velocity gradients . to obtain the time evolution of the average concentration , one might choose to ignore all the details of the turbulence and spatially average equation [ eq : z ] . ignoring also the molecular diffusion and source terms , we get @xmath28 for mean concentration and velocity @xmath7 and @xmath29 and fluctuating parts @xmath30 and @xmath24 . the last term is zero for incompressible turbulence , leaving only @xmath31 , which contains the unknown ensemble average of the scalar flux , @xmath32 , representing interactions between the fluctuating parts of the velocity and concentration fields . this is a classic closure problem . we could derive a differential equation for the scalar flux , but it would contain more unknown correlations , including triple correlations , and further manipulation only leads to higher and higher order unknowns . in the incompressible case , the simplest treatment is to imagine that the turbulent transport behaves diffusively , like molecules in a gas . then the scalar flux is proportional to the mean concentration gradient and given by @xmath33 where @xmath34 is a scalar diffusivity given by some timescale times the square of some velocity . often these are taken to be the correlation time and the rms velocity , although a variety of other forms have been used to fit specific experimental results ( piterbarg & ostrovskii 1997 ) . using equation [ eq : flux ] , equation [ eq : zave ] becomes the usual diffusion equation , and the patch of concentration , if initially a point source , would spread according to a gaussian whose width grows @xmath35 . in fact , turbulent transport can not be described by classical diffusion because triple correlations are as important as quadratic correlations , or , more physically , turbulent motions are not random independent steps but correlated bulk transports over a wide range of scales . there have been many attempts , all unsuccessful to various degrees , to develop closure techniques for passive scalar turbulence . many of these are described in reviews by obrien ( 1980 ) and dopazo ( 1994 ) . perhaps the most popular in the physics community is the mapping closure suggested by chen , chen & kraichnan ( 1989 ) . a more complicated closure method is based on the eddy - damped quasinormal markovian approximation ( lesieur 1990 ) . an application of this closure to the passive scalar problem with reference to earlier work is in herr , wang & collins ( 1996 ) . a promising approach that is not too complex yet captures the importance of the triple correlations was proposed by blackman & field ( 2002 ) in connection with turbulent dynamo theory and then applied to the scalar turbulence problem ( blackman & field 2003 ) . the idea is to model the time derivative of the scalar flux as a normal diffusion term with an eddy viscosity plus a damping term @xmath36 , where @xmath14 is a relaxation time . this approach is similar to a closure method used in terrestrial atmospheric turbulent transport ( lewellen 1977 ) . when this is substituted in the equation for @xmath7 , a little manipulation results in a damped wave equation for the mean concentration . brandenburg , kapyla & mohammed ( 2004 ) did extensive comparisons with numerical simulations of passive scalars in mildly compressible turbulence ( rms mach number @xmath10.2 ) and found good agreement with this model for the time evolution of the spreading size and the non - gaussianity ( kurtosis ) of @xmath7 . the moment approach can derive the variance of the abundance distribution directly from equation [ eq : z ] by writing the velocity , abundance , and source fields as the sum of mean and fluctuating parts ( e.g. , @xmath37 ) , multiplying the resulting equation for @xmath38 by @xmath30 , and then ensemble averaging to obtain @xmath39 where @xmath40 is the fluctuating part of the source term ( @xmath41 ) . the first term on the right shows how the scalar flux ( @xmath42 ) interacts with any large - scale gradient in the abundance , increasing variance if @xmath42 is proportional to a mean gradient ( as in equation [ eq : flux ] ) . this is analogous to how stellar orbit diffusion in the presence of a radial gradient produces fluctuations in the stellar abundances . the second term indicates that any gradient in the mean square fluctuations will be advected with the mean flow ( e.g. , radial flows or infall ) . the third term in equation [ eq : z2 ] shows how turbulence can affect a concentration variance even with no gradient in @xmath7 , zero mean velocity , and without diffusion . writing this term as @xmath43 shows that it consists of the mean divergence of the flux of scalar variance , as might be expected , minus a term that is only nonzero in the presence of compressibility . differentiation and ensemble averaging commute , so the first term of these two is zero for a homogeneous fluid because ensemble averages do not depend on spatial position . the fourth term represents the net production of scalar variance by the fluctuating nucleosynthetic sources . `` diffusion '' in this context is shorthand for the fairly complex set of second - order derivatives involving mass diffusion at the molecular level . as a simple illustration , assume there are no large scale flows and the abundance is linear in galactocentric distance with constant of proportionality @xmath44 . for a general gradient term , we would have the triple correlation whose closure is discussed by blackman & field ( 2003 ) and brandenburg , kapyla & mohammed ( 2004 ) . then we can also derive an equation for the correlation @xmath42 by multiplying equation [ eq : z ] by @xmath24 and ensemble averaging . the result is , for @xmath45 , @xmath46 the first term on the right , which is @xmath47 for an isotropic velocity field , represents the production of correlations by interaction of the velocity fluctuations with the mean metallicity gradient . we can assume that we are given some steady - state isotropic turbulent velocity field so that @xmath48 is constant . the second term on the right , often called pressure scrambling , is a serious closure problem for compressible turbulence . the source term is important if the metals come from young stars whose formation is associated with the turbulence itself , but for type i supernovae or any other source that has time to decorrelate from the flow , @xmath49 . this indicates the importance of using a consistent model for the formation of metal - producers from the turbulent field . equations [ eq : z2 ] and [ eq : zu ] can now be solved to give the evolution of the standard deviation of the abundance distribution for a particular velocity and source field . if we neglect pressure scrambling in equation [ eq : zu ] and the compressibility term in equation [ eq : z2 ] , and also replace the triple correlation term with a simple gradient - diffusion closure , then the result would show that the concentration fluctuation variance increases @xmath50 , even in the absence of sources . the turbulence is transporting high - z gas into low - z gas ( and vice versa ) due to the existence of the gradient . obviously , after some time the large fluctuations imply steep gradients at very small scales , and so the microscopic diffusion term will cause the variance to level off . in addition , the gradient itself will be washed out by the turbulence unless there is some mechanism continually producing it . without a sustained mean gradient , such equations could be used to understand how the variance in elemental fluctuations should decrease with time under the action of only advection and diffusion , giving a simplified model to understand the numerical decay results of de avillez & mac low ( 2002 ) . with some assumed closure for the source terms , or with prescribed velocity field statistics , the solution of equation [ eq : z2 ] would show how the abundance variance depends on the source rate . the source terms in the transport equations depend on how the metals in expanding supernovae and superbubbles are released into the turbulent background . this is not a trivial problem , as discussed by tenorio - tagle ( 1996 ) . simulations of superbubbles ( korpi et al . 1999 ) and supernova remnants ( balsara et al . 2001 ) expanding into a turbulent ism may provide guidance . some metal - producing outflows should be jet - like , leading to the release of metals by shear flow along the walls of a chimney . begelman & fabian ( 1990 ) and slavin , shull & begelman ( 1993 ) proposed that such turbulent layers could mix hot and warm gas , but they could just as well mix freshly - produced metals . tenorio - tagle ( 1996 ) suggested that superbubbles blow out of the disk and rain down metal rich droplets that break apart by rayleigh - taylor instabilities . this process could disperse metals over several kpc in the disk with no assistance from disk turbulence . these processes are also relevant for the redistribution of elements ejected by galactic blowout into the intergalactic medium ( igm ) . several papers ( e.g. , ferrara et al . 2000 , aguirre et al . 2001 and references therein ) have noticed that it is difficult to mix metals on scales comparable to the mean distance between galaxies , requiring an additional ( unknown ) mechanism . turbulence in the igm could provide such a mechanism . the advection of the grains by turbulent gas can lead to spatial clustering relative to the gas , and to a spatially inhomogeneous dust - to - gas ratio . the degree of segregation depends on the grain size . local variations in grain - grain velocities affect grain growth and shattering . early estimates for the efficiency of this process were given by cameron ( 1973 ) , burke & silk ( 1976 ) , scalo ( 1977 ) , and draine ( 1985 ) , but the conception of how grain advection occurs differs greatly in these papers . more rigorous derivations , aimed at grain collisions in protostellar disks but also applicable to the ism , were given by vlk et al . ( 1980 ) and markiewicz , mizuno & vlk ( 1991 ) . recent work has been directed toward trapping grains in protoplanetary disks by anticyclonic vortices ( e.g. , bracco et al . 1999 ) , which can persist for many turnover times . large grain concentrations can result , accelerating the formation of planetesimals . grains might also become trapped in the general ism because of drag forces , as proposed by falgarone & puget ( 1995 ) . a review of experiments and simulations on turbulent gas - grain segregation was presented by fessler , kulick & eaton ( 1994 ) . more recent theoretical investigations ( e.g. , sigurgeirsson & stuart 2002 , lopez & puglisi 2003 ) have demonstrated several interesting properties of this clustering . all of this work relies on synthetic velocity fields because inertial particle advection in real turbulent flows would require resolution much finer than the dissipation scale . nevertheless , the essential physics of particle drag is becoming more clear . the particle motion is dissipative even if the advecting flow is incompressible , and hence , dissipationless ( balkovsky , falkovich & fouxon 2001 ) . this leads to simplified treatments in which the stokes drag effect is modeled as a small compressible component to the velocity field of the inertial particles . a detailed study of inertial particle dynamics in incompressible flows ( bec et al . 2003 ) shows that particles smaller than a critical size form fractal clusters whereas larger sizes fill space with a nonuniform density . an extension to highly compressible flows is desirable . the motion of charged dust grains in anisotropic magnetohydrodynamic ( mhd ) turbulence was considered by yan & lazarian ( 2002 ) , who made a distinction between the directions parallel and perpendicular to the field . grains with a gyration time around the field that is shorter than the gas drag time will follow the turbulent field fluctuations in the perpendicular direction . yan & lazarian ( 2003b ) calculated the acceleration of charged grains that resonate with mhd fluctuations . another reason to study stirring by interstellar turbulence is to understand the origin of galactic radial abundance gradients ( carraro et al . 1998 , hou et al . 2000 , rolleston et al . 2000 ) . models typically account for these gradients using a radially dependent timescale for infall and star formation ( e.g. , chiappini et al . 2001 ) . a problem is that turbulence should reduce large - scale gradients , so studies of this turbulent washout could give an estimate of the timescale on which the gradient must be replenished . order of magnitude estimates along the lines of those mentioned in section [ sect : howlarge ] indicate replenishment timescales larger than characteristic infall times , suggesting that contributions from a radially dependent stellar initial mass function ( imf ) or other effects are not required . a peculiar abundance gradient has been observed in the outer galaxy , where clusters ( twarog et al . 1997 ) and cepheids ( caputo et al . 2001 , andrievsky et al . 2002 , luck et al . 2003 ) suggest a sudden decrease in metal abundance by about 0.2 dex setting in at 10 kpc . this discontinuity appears over a radial distance less than 1 kpc . it is hard to see how such a feature could survive turbulent washout for more than @xmath2 years using timescale arguments of the type summarized earlier . either we are missing something fundamental about turbulent transport ( e.g. , maybe differential rotation or magnetism suppress turbulent motions in the radial direction ) , or this metallicity near - discontinuity does not really exist . the coupling of interstellar chemistry to the dynamics of interstellar gas has focused for a long time on collapsing or slowly contracting clouds ( e.g. , gerola & glassgold 1978 ; prasad , heere & tarafdar 1991 ; shematovich et al . 2003 ) and single shocks or mhd waves ( e.g. , hollenbach & mckee 1979 , 1989 ; draine & katz 1986 ; charnley 1998 ; flower & pineau des forts 1998 ) . the collapse models explained why early - time solutions for static chemistry often agreed better with observations than late - time solutions ( e.g. , prasad et al . 1991 ; nejad & wagenblast 1999 ; but see turner et al . the result that nondynamical time - dependent abundances agreed with observations for different ages is a strong motivation for the influence of turbulence because turbulent timescales are often smaller than the chemical equilibrium times . turbulent transport can prevent the chemistry from attaining a steady state ( e.g. , phillips & huggins 1981 ; xie , allen & langer 1995 ; willacy , langer & allen 2002 ) . turbulence can affect ism chemistry in three ways : ( _ a _ ) by continually transporting material between regions with different physical conditions , like ambient ultraviolet ( uv ) radiation flux , temperature , and density , ( _ b _ ) by creating localized heating where temperature - sensitive reactions , especially those involving endothermic reactions , will be enhanced , and ( _ c _ ) by magnetically forcing ions to move faster than the thermal speed where they can enhance the temperature - sensitive ion - neutral reactions . progress in this field is difficult because of limitations in the dynamical models and because of the large number of nondynamical chemical effects that may occur , like neutral - neutral reactions at low temperature , variable c and o depletion , three - body channels for dissociative recombination , the presence of cosmic - ray - induced uv photons , chemical phase transitions , and many more , as reviewed by herbst ( 1999 ) , hollenbach & tielens ( 1999 ) , van dishoeck & hogerheijde ( 1999 ) , and langer et al . ( 2000 ) . for more recent work on chemistry covering a variety of applications not necessarily related to turbulence , see roberts & herbst ( 2002 ) , doty et al . ( 2002 ) , stantcheva & herbst ( 2003 ) , shematovich et al . ( 2003 ) , and charnley & markwick ( 2003 ) . the classic observation that implied turbulent transport was the large amount of carbon in the gas phase of dense molecular cores , considering the short freeze - out time on dust . boland & dejong ( 1982 ) proposed that turbulent circulation could explain this discrepancy by bringing grains to the outer layers for uv desorption . modern observations ( kramer et al . 1999 ) show more depletion , however , and photodissociation region ( pdr ) models suggest carbon comes from clump surfaces at a range of depths ( howe et al . 2000 ) . turbulent transport has other applications in modern chemical models . pijpers ( 1997 ) considered a diffusive model of turbulent grain transport and obtained a long migration time . ragot ( 1998 ) pointed out that turbulent transport is probably neither ballistic nor diffusive , and used a model based on levy flights to return to the smaller timescales . this transport effect is important because the degree to which co is released from grains into the gas can affect the rest of the chemistry ( co deactivates much chemistry by depleting the h@xmath51 ion ; nejad & wagenblast 1999 ) . a detailed study of turbulent transport including 87 species and 1100 reactions was given by xie et al . ( 1995 ) , who assumed that radial flux is proportional to the spatial gradient of a species and used a mixing length model for turbulent diffusion . they found that most carbon - bearing species and several other important molecules were strongly affected by turbulence . the model was extended recently by willacy , langer & allen ( 2002 ) , who showed how the _ h i_/h@xmath52 ratio could provide a sensitive signature of turbulent transport . this occurs because h@xmath52 forms when h reacts on dust grains . the formation rate depends on the density of atomic h and the total dust cross section , whereas the destruction rate depends on the uv field . if turbulence cycles material between regions with different uv optical depths on a timescale comparable to the formation time , then h will penetrate deeper into the cloud and h@xmath52 will be closer to the surface . because many other simple molecules are formed from h@xmath52-based intermediaries ( especially h@xmath51 ) , turbulent transport could control the chemistry for many species . timescales for reaching chemical equilibrium depend on density , temperature , and ionization fraction , and are typically @xmath53@xmath54 years ( van dishoeck & hogerheijde 1999 ) . for the atomic part of a photodissociation region , the longest part of the cycle c@xmath55 ch@xmath56 co@xmath57 c @xmath58c@xmath59 is the formation time of ch@xmath60 through radiative association ( tielens & hollenbach 1985 ) with a timescale @xmath110@xmath61 years for @xmath62 particle density in units of @xmath63 @xmath64 . for turbulent transport , the fastest possible timescale is ballistic , @xmath65 , for turbulent speed @xmath66 and length @xmath67 . using the ism scaling relations for illustration ( see _ interstellar turbulence i _ ) , this minimum time is @xmath68 years . the chemical and transport timescales are comparable at @xmath63 @xmath64 , but the transport time becomes larger than the chemical time at higher density and then turbulence would seem to have little effect . because cosmic ray ionization drives the chemistry , and each ionized h@xmath52 molecule eventually forms co or some other important molecule , the chemical timescale in the cores of dense clouds is the ratio of the relative abundance of co , @xmath110@xmath69 , to the cosmic ray ionization rate , @xmath14@xmath70 s@xmath71 ; this gives @xmath110@xmath72 years ( d.j . hollenbach , private communication ) . another way in which turbulence may affect chemistry is through localized heating in shocks ( flower & pineau des for@xmath73ts 1998 ) , vortices ( joulain et al . 1998 ) , ambipolar diffusion ( padoan , zweibel & nordlund 2000 ) , and magnetic reconnection ( lazarian & vishniac 1999 ) . there are many reactions that seem to require higher than normal temperatures . for diffuse clouds , the large abundance of ch@xmath59 and molecules like hco@xmath59 that can form from ch@xmath59 , and the large abundance of oh ( gredel 1997 , lucas & liszt 1997 ) , all suggest that high temperature ( @xmath110@xmath74 k ) reactions take place , as in shock fronts ( elitzur & watson 1980 , draine & katz 1986 ) . however , the correlation between ch@xmath59 and the lower - temperature molecule c@xmath52 ( gredel 1999 ) , and the similar radial velocities of ch@xmath59 and ch rule out ch@xmath59 production in single large shocks or cloud surfaces . instead , ch@xmath59 could be made in numerous unresolved shocks that blend on a line of sight with cooler gas at the same average velocity ( gredel , pineau des for@xmath75ts & federman 2002 ) . part of the appeal of turbulence is its great range of scales that can yield such an effect . temperature fluctuations of several hundred degrees could play a major role in the chemistry of many species because of the inverse temperature dependence of radiative association and the range of activation energies for collisional dissociation , neutral - neutral reactions , and some ion - molecule reactions . neutral - neutral reactions may be important even in dark clouds ( bettens et al . prasad & huntress ( 1980 ) long ago pointed out the importance of temperature variations in radiative association reactions and some ion - molecule reactions . also , in dense shielded clouds , warm regions drive most of the o , oh , and o@xmath52 to h@xmath52o through reactions like o + h@xmath76 oh@xmath77h and oh+h@xmath76h@xmath52o+h ( e.g. , charnley 1998 ) , not only enhancing the h@xmath52o abundance , but also preventing the formation of molecules like so@xmath52 , which rely on the oxygen species for their formation . the cn abundance should be enhanced because its destruction by reaction with o and o@xmath52 is suppressed ; this can lead to enhanced production of hc@xmath78n through reaction of cn with c@xmath52h@xmath52 . there have been several attempts to model the effects of local turbulent heating on chemistry . black & van dishoeck ( 1991 ) pointed out that if turbulence extends down to the collisional mean free path , then the tail of the particle velocity distribution could be enhanced . reaction rates are averages over the particle relative velocity distribution , so energy - dependent cross - sections could have greatly enhanced rates . spaans ( 1996 ) noted that the distribution of velocity differences in turbulent flows at small scales has a large tail and suggested this could result in non - maxwellian relative speeds between molecules , especially those involved with ch@xmath59 production . this assumption is questionable because the reaction scales are the mean free paths , of order 1au@xmath79 , and these are smaller than the viscous dissipation scale of incompressible turbulence . the validity of the fluid approximation for neutrals is also questionable at these scales ( see _ interstellar turbulence i _ ) , although mhd turbulence in the ionic component could enhance the ion - neutral collision rate . another approach to the problem was presented in a series of papers by falgarone and coworkers . falgarone & puget ( 1995 ) , falgarone et al . ( 1995 ) , and joulain et al . ( 1998 ) considered the diffuse cloud abundances of ch@xmath59 and several other molecules such as oh and hco@xmath59 . they focused on the solenoidal part of the velocity field in which molecular viscosity on 10 au scales produces numerous local hot spots ( up to several times @xmath80k ) . falgarone et al . ( 1995 ) showed that the resulting chemical column densities were consistent with observations . joulain et al . ( 1998 ) used a burgers - vortex model for the dissipation to explain other features , such as the similarity of ch and ch@xmath59 line centroid velocities , when the number of dissipation regions on the line of sight is large . decamp & le bourlot ( 2002 ) approximated turbulence by a stochastic 1d velocity field correlated in space and time , and solved the continuity equation for the density of each species . for a small reaction network , the abundances developed different patterns on different scales , showing how species segregation can occur in a turbulent flow . species that do not normally peak at the same time for a nonturbulent model can coexist in a turbulent model , which means that the age of a region can not be inferred from the abundances . the issue of chemical differentiation is important because it is well - established and unexplained in a number of starless cores such as tmc-1 , l134n , and l1544 , and observed as 110 au variations in co , h@xmath52co , and oh relative to h@xmath52 toward extragalactic background sources ( marscher , moore & bania 1993 ; moore & marscher 1995 ; for more recent work , see pan , federman & welty 2001 ; rollinde et al . 2003 ; stanimirovic et al . although some of these variations may be attributed to freeze - out of molecules on dust grains ( bergin et al . 2002 ) , most are probably also affected by time - dependent chemistry ( langer et al . one important timescale is cloud contraction ( shematovich et al . 2003 ) , but another is turbulent cycling between different physical conditions over a range of timescales ( decamp & le bourlot 2002 ) . the observed variations at scales so small that gravity is unimportant seem to favor turbulence . the calculations by decamp & lebourlet also develop a bistable chemical pattern in which dual equilibria are possible . however , it is not known how many of the effects result from the imposed artificial velocity field , which is not able to react to the changing density field through pressure . the only truly hydrodynamical turbulence simulation that included a small but relevant chemical reaction subset was by pavlovski et al . ( 2002 ) , who generalized previous work by mac low and coworkers to include a large number of coolants and a wide range of possible temperatures and densities . the reaction network in pavlovski et al . included h , c , o , and five molecules formed from them , and it included h@xmath52 formation on grains . they followed the decay of hypersonic turbulence without self - gravity in a dense ( @xmath81 @xmath64 ) , small ( @xmath82 cm ) region . their surprising result was that after h@xmath52 dissociated in a shock , the molecules reformed in a pattern of filaments , clumps , and diffuse gas yet the abundances were fairly uniform after only 100 years . there are probably other processes that produce localized regions of hot chemistry . for example , ambipolar diffusion heating depends on a high - order derivative of the magnetic field and so can produce heating rates that exceed the average rate by orders of magnitude on very small scales ( padoan , zweibel , & nordlund 2000 ) . magnetic reconnection ( lazarian & vishniac 1999 ) is another possibility for localized hot gas . the chemistry induced by these processes has not yet been investigated . cosmic rays scatter off magnetic waves and mhd turbulence as the particles propagate along magnetic field lines , and they generate waves and turbulence if they stream much faster than the local alfvn speed . observations of cosmic rays at the earth and of radio and x - ray emissions produced by cosmic rays at their sources and throughout the galaxy suggest the ism is filled with irregularities on the scale of a particle gyroradius . this ranges from 1 au to 1 pc for protons with energies between a few gev and the knee of the cosmic ray energy distribution at @xmath83 ev . this section reviews the connection between cosmic rays and turbulence . it is not known if the turbulence that scatters cosmic rays has the same origin as the turbulence on larger scales , i.e. , whether it is part of an energy cascade from these larger scales . it could be generated locally , for example , by the cosmic rays themselves or in other small scale instabilities ( see also section 3 , _ interstellar turbulence i _ ) , and it could be more similar to scintillation turbulence , which has the same small scale ( section [ sect : scint ] ) than molecular cloud turbulence , which is presumably generated on much larger scales . other reviews of cosmic rays are in cesarsky ( 1980 ) , berezinskii et al . ( 1990 ) , drury et al . ( 2001 ) , jokipii ( 2001 ) , ptuskin ( 2001 ) , and schlickeiser ( 2002 ) . the important point about cosmic rays from the perspective of this review is that they scatter frequently , diffusing rather than streaming through the galaxy . their total path length determined from the ratio of secondary to primary nuclei is equivalent to @xmath84 galactic disk crossings at gev energies ( engelmann et al . 1990 , higdon & lingenfelter 2003 ) . their flight time determined from isotope ratios ranges from @xmath115 my for a leaky - box model with a small halo ( simpson & garcia - munoz 1988 , yanasak et al . 2001 ) to @xmath2 years for a diffusion model in a @xmath15 kpc halo ( ptuskin & soutoul 1998 ) . they scatter so frequently that their flux at the earth is isotropic to within @xmath85 ( cutler & groom 1991 , munakata et al . 1997 ) , even though there are only a handful of nearby sources ( i.e. , geminga , vela , lupus loop , loop iii see ptuskin & soutoul 1998 , jones et al . 2001 , taillet & maurin 2003 ) . the scattering distance , @xmath86 , is the step size in a random walk over the galactic thickness @xmath87 ( achterberg , blandford & reynolds 1994 ) . for @xmath88 random isotropic scatterings , @xmath89 , so for total distance travelled @xmath90 with @xmath91 particle speed , we get @xmath92 at gev energies . this is a very small distance on galactic scales , but still much larger than a gyroradius , @xmath93 for rest mass @xmath94 , relativistic @xmath95 , and @xmath96 , magnetic field strength @xmath97(gauss ) and charge @xmath98 with @xmath99 esu . in the expression for @xmath100 , the angle of particle motion with respect to the field line is @xmath101 . taking @xmath102 and @xmath103 , we get @xmath104 cm for hadron particle energy @xmath105 in gev and field strength @xmath106 in microgauss . thus , the mean scattering distance for gev energies is @xmath110@xmath72 gyroradii and the gyroradius has the same scale as the solar system . the relative amplitude of the magnetic irregularities @xmath107 that have the size @xmath100 may be determined from the random walk of angular deflections , @xmath108 , which build up in proportion to the square root of the number @xmath109 of gyrations as @xmath110 for small @xmath111 . the scattering frequency is @xmath112 , and the number of gyrations is @xmath113 for gyrofrequency @xmath114 . thus , @xmath115 and @xmath116 when @xmath1170.2 pc . evidently , magnetic fluctuations of less than one percent on 0.1 au scales can isotropize cosmic rays with gev energies ; in general , a wide spectrum of fluctuations is needed to scatter the full energy range . this level of irregularity is much smaller than observed on @xmath118 pc scales from pulsar dispersion measures , which suggest @xmath119 g and @xmath120 g ( rand & kulkarni 1989 ) . it is also smaller than the integrated fluctuations found by scintillation on scales less than @xmath121 pc , which give @xmath122 g and @xmath123 g ( minter & spangler 1997 ) , and smaller than @xmath124 from optical polarization ( heiles 1996 , fosalba et al . 2002 ) . a spectrum of magnetic energy fluctuations like the kolmogorov or kraichnan spectra will make @xmath111 much smaller on the scale of the gyroradius than these observed field irregularities . such a spectrum will also give the required rigidity dependence for the diffusion coefficient ( strong & moskalenko 1998 ) . the rigidity of a cosmic ray is @xmath125 . cosmic rays can also scatter off strong magnetic irregularities having a scale comparable to or larger than r@xmath126 ( jokipii 1987 ) . inverting the above expression and integrating over a spectrum of waves @xmath127 , the mean free path is @xmath128 ( schlickeiser 1989 ) . for @xmath124 and a particle gyroradius that fits inside the compressed region , @xmath129 , this gives @xmath130 . if the scattering arises in a network of strong shocks in a supersonically turbulent medium , then the mean free path for diffusion will be about the shock separation . because the gyroradius of gev protons is less than the collision mean free path for atoms and ions , collisional mhd models of compressible turbulence do not apply to these small scales ( see _ interstellar turbulence i _ and section [ sect : mirror ] below ) . the field line fluctuations that scatter cosmic rays could be coherent waves , stochastic turbulence , or shock fronts . one common view of waves is that they are weak fluctuations compared with the mean field , with wave travel times much longer than an oscillation period and a well - defined dispersion relation between frequency and wavenumber . particles in such a wave field interact successively with many crests , travelling rapidly along the field until their cumulative pitch angle deviation becomes large and they begin to interact with a different wave train . a turbulent medium is not so regular but particle interactions with a broad wave spectrum can be similar as long as the particle sees a magnetic perturbation with the right wavelength after each gyration . in both cases the field can be treated as static for the fast - moving particles . much of the history of cosmic ray theory is based on observations of the solar wind , which contains a mixture of weak and strong fluctuations , depending on frequency ( drge 1994 ; goldstein , roberts & matthaeus 1995 ) . perhaps @xmath115% of it is in the form of slab - like alfvn waves ( @xmath131 ) and @xmath185% is two - dimensional ( 2d ) magnetic turbulence ( @xmath132 , bieber , wanner & matthaeus 1996 ) . here , @xmath133 and @xmath134 are wavenumbers perpendicular and parallel to the mean field . the solar wind observations led to the quasilinear theory of cosmic ray propagation ( jokipii 1966 ) , which assumes the field is uniform in space and unchanging in time over a particle gyration . interstellar applications of this theory may be appropriate at high spatial frequencies where weak electron perturbations scatter radio waves ( section [ sect : scint ] ) , or near shock fronts where weak waves on either side scatter relativistic particles back and forth ( section [ sect : cracc ] ) , or for waves that are excited by the cosmic rays themselves ( chandran 2000a ) . the waves cause cosmic rays to diffuse in both momentum and space ( e.g. , schlickeiser 1994 ) . momentum diffusion means that velocities change and isotropize ; space diffusion means that cosmic rays spread out slowly to more uniform densities . the two diffusion coefficients are inversely related : higher momentum diffusion means lower spatial diffusion as the particles isotropize their velocities more easily . there are two types of waves that could be important for cosmic ray scattering . alfvn waves are transverse oscillations with a restoring force from field line tension and a frequency less than the ion gyro frequency . their dispersion relation between frequency @xmath135 and wavenumber @xmath26 is @xmath136 for angle @xmath137 between the wave propagation vector and the average field . their group and phase velocity parallel to the mean field is the alfvn speed @xmath138 for ion density @xmath139 . when thermal pressure with sound speed @xmath140 contributes to the restoring force there are also magnetosonic waves with the dispersion relation @xmath141^{1/2}\right).\ ] ] the positive and negative signs are for fast and slow waves . for oblique propagation of magnetosonic waves , when @xmath142 , the phase speed of the fast mode can be large along the field lines : @xmath143 in the low @xmath144 limit ( @xmath144 is the ratio of thermal to magnetic pressures , @xmath145 ) and @xmath146 in the high @xmath144 limit . this speed is important for cosmic rays because they also move quickly along the field lines and will resonate with the magnetic fluctuations in these waves . oblique magnetosonic waves also have a magnetic pressure that varies slightly along the field as a result of the successive convergences and divergences of the velocity and field , which are in phase for fast waves and out of phase for slow waves . these field line changes create magnetic mirrors that enhance the scattering ( schlickeiser & miller 1998 , ragot 2000 ) . the condition for resonance between a cosmic ray and a wave is ( jokipii 1966 , hall & sturrock 1967 , hasselmann & wibberenz 1968 ) @xmath147 this expression says that the doppler shifted frequency of the magnetic wave , as viewed by the particle moving parallel to the field at speed @xmath148 for pitch angle @xmath101 , equals an integer number , @xmath4 , of the gyration frequency . for an alfvn wave , @xmath149 , and for a fast mode at low @xmath144 , @xmath150 . the case @xmath151 is gyroresonance . for wave spectra that decrease with @xmath26 as a power law , only the lowest - order resonances ( @xmath152 ) are important ( cesarsky & kulsrud 1973 ) . magnetosonic waves have an additional resonance for @xmath153 ( lee & vlk 1975 , fisk 1976 , achterberg 1981 ) , when particles stay between two crests by moving along the field at the parallel wave speed . such a particle slows down when it hits the compressive part of the wave ahead of it ( by the mirror effect ) , and it speeds up if the compressive part hits the particle from behind . as a particle oscillates between crests , it can have a parallel velocity that resonates with another wave moving faster along the field , and then jump over to become trapped between two new crests . for a broad wave spectrum , the particle jumps from one wave to the next , gaining energy on average . this process is called transit time acceleration of particles or transit time damping ( ttd ) of waves ( miller 1997 , schlickeiser & miller 1998 ) . ttd increases the parallel component of cosmic ray momentum by mirror scattering in the wave frame . the mirror force depends on the square of the perpendicular component of the velocity ( section [ sect : mirror ] ) , so ttd must operate with the pitch - angle scattering of gyroresonance to maintain momentum isotropy ( miller 1997 ) . a particle that interacts with an alfvn wave can resonate only with the wavelength that is equal to the parallel gyrolength in the doppler shifted frame , @xmath154 . a particle that interacts with magnetosonic waves can respond to the whole wave spectrum because it can choose the wave direction @xmath137 where the parallel wave speed equals its own ( schlickeiser & miller 1998 , schlickeiser & vainio 1999 ) . in practice , such a wave field may not have the appropriate @xmath137 because wave damping is larger at higher @xmath137 . ttd was originally thought to be such an important energy loss for the waves that the fast mode would not be important for cosmic rays ( schlickeiser 1994 , minter & spangler 1997 , tsap 2000 ) . damping is large for high @xmath144 because the thermal particles resonate with the waves and only highly parallel modes exist ( holman et al . 1979 , foote & kulsrud 1979 ) . however , @xmath155 in the solar wind and in much of the cool dense phase of the ism , and observations of the solar wind show that oblique and fast modes dominate over plane - parallel alfvn waves ( tu , marsch & thieme 1989 ; bieber , wanner & matthaeus 1996 ; matthaeus , goldstein & roberts 1990 ) . thus , ttd particle acceleration could be important in parts of the ism where @xmath144 is small . the waves still have to be nearly isotropic to get effective scattering , though , and they should not be damped by other processes , such as ion - neutral or viscous friction . such damping is important in most of the neutral medium where @xmath156 is otherwise favorable for ttd ( kulsrud & pearce 1969 , felice & kulsrud 2001 ) . this leaves few places where wave damping is low enough that ttd might be important . alfvn wave scattering is questionable too because of the extreme anisotropy of the fluctuations that may cascade down from pc scales to the gyroradius . anisotropic turbulence produces tiny perpendicular irregularities that average out over a particle gyration ( chandran 2000a , 2001 ; lerche & schlickeiser 2001 ; yan & lazarian 2002 ; teufel , lerche & schlickeiser 2003 ) . the result is a scattering coefficient that is many orders of magnitude less than in the isotropic case . for this reason , yan & lazarian ( 2003a ) reconsidered ttd scattering by fast modes at moderate @xmath144 , emphasizing the isotropy of the fast waves and considering ism regions where wave damping at particular cosmic ray energies is relatively small . the resolution of this damping problem for wave scattering is far from clear . the energy of fast cosmic ray gyrations is adiabatically invariant during slow changes in the magnetic field amplitude , so an increasing field puts more energy into the gyromotion while removing it from the parallel motion . this change , combined with momentum conservation , causes fast particles with high pitch angles to bounce off converging field lines . the mirror force is @xmath157 for magnetic moment @xmath158 with particle mass @xmath94 . this type of scattering involves very long wavelengths parallel to the field ( ragot 1999 , 2000 ; felice & kulsrud 2001 ; lu et al . the mirror sources could also be molecular clouds and clumps ( chandran 2000b ) . electric fields can also scatter cosmic rays . the flow of plasma at speed @xmath159 transverse to a magnetic field generates an electric field , @xmath160 , that can be important in the parallel direction when the magnetic field has at least 2d structure , and it is convected around by turbulent motions ( fedorov et al . 1992 , le roux et al . 2002 ) . transport transverse to the mean field occurs as individual field lines wander ( jokipii & parker 1969 , bieber & matthaeus 1997 , michalek & ostrowski 1998 , giacalone & jokipii 1999 , kta & jokipii 2000 ) . this is important for radial diffusion in the solar wind , which has a spiral field ( chen & bieber 1993 ) , for diffusion in oblique shock fronts ( duffy et al . 1995 ) , and for diffusion in the vertical direction out of the galaxy . magnetic fields with irregularities smaller than the gyroradius cause particles to skip over field lines , giving anomalous diffusion ( parker 1964 ; chuvilgin & ptuskin 1993 ; casse , lemoine & pelletier 2002 ; otsuka & hada 2003 ; erlykin et al . braided field lines can lead to sub - diffusion ( getmantsev 1963 ) , when the mean squared particle position in the cross field direction increases as the square root of time , instead of directly with time as in normal diffusion . compound diffusion has both cross - field diffusion and diffusion along the field lines ( kirk et al . cross diffusion requires a lot of perpendicular structure to the field lines over a diffusion length for the particle motion parallel to the field ( qin , matthaeus & bieber 2002 ) . for ism turbulence , the cross - field diffusion coefficient is 0.10.2 of the parallel coefficient ( chandran & maron 2004a ) . shocks provide another site for cosmic ray scattering . blandford & ostriker ( 1980 ) considered an ism made of cleared hot cavities from supernovae and showed how the resulting shocks could scatter and accelerate cosmic rays . bykov & toptygin ( 1985 ) extended this model to include secondary shocks that arise in the turbulence caused by the supernovae . klepach , ptuskin & zirakashvili ( 2000 ) included stellar wind shocks . the composite spectrum of cosmic rays from an ensemble of shocks in a supersonically turbulent medium was determined by schneider ( 1993 ) . in such a medium , the summed energy distribution for cosmic rays from all of the shocks is close to a power law , but there can be flat parts or bumps , unlike the energy distribution from a single shock ( see also achterberg 1990 , bykov & toptygin 1993 ) . cosmic rays gain energy as they scatter off randomly moving parts of the ism ( fermi 1949 ) . this is momentum diffusion and called the second - order fermi mechanism because the energy gained per collision depends on the second power of the rms turbulent speed . it is reminiscent of the thermalization of a star cluster with the light particles gaining speed as they approach equilibrium with the heavy particles . scott & chevalier ( 1975 ) first applied this mechanism to supernova remnants , using random motions inside the remnant for scattering sites . supernovae are a likely source for cosmic rays because the cosmic ray energy density , @xmath11 ev @xmath64 , divided by a @xmath115 my lifetime in the galaxy , is about 5% of the total supernova power ( baade & zwicky 1934 , ginzburg & syrovatskii 1964 ) . cosmic ray acceleration by momentum diffusion occurs throughout a compressibly turbulent ism , not just in supernova remnants ( kulsrud & ferrari 1978 , ptuskin 1988 , dolginov & silantev 1990 , bykov & toptygin 1993 , webb et al . 2003 , chandran & maron 2004b ) . in a system of many shocks , particles that are trapped in the weak magnetic turbulence of the ambient medium also get accelerated every time these regions are compressed ( jokipii 1987 ) . multiple shock crossings at the edge of a supernova remnant also accelerate cosmic rays ( see review in blandford & eichler 1987 ) . if the field is parallel to the shock direction , then magnetic turbulence created ahead of the shock by the outward streaming particles ( wentzel 1974 , skilling 1975 ) scatters these particles back into the shock where they encounter more turbulence . the post - shock turbulence was formerly pre - shock turbulence that got compressed and amplified ( schlickeiser , campeanu & lerche 1993 ; vainio & schlickeiser 1998 ) . if the field is oblique to the shock direction , then gyromotions ( jokipii 1987 ) and field line wandering cycle particles through the front ( ragot 2001 ) . each time a particle cycles through the front it gains energy from the converging flow . this is called the first - order fermi mechanism ( fermi 1954 ) because the energy gained per crossing depends on the first power of the shock velocity . about @xmath161 of the incoming thermal particles are injected into cosmic rays ( pryadko & petrosian 1997 ; kang , jones & gieseler 2002 ; bamba et al . 2003 ) , with an efficiency depending on obliqueness ( ellison , baring & jones 1995 ; kobayakawa , honda , samura 2002 ) . generally , the first - order mechanism dominates in strong shocks ( axford et al . 1977 , krymsky 1977 , bell 1978 , ostrowski 1994 ) , although the second mechanism is more important downstream than upstream ( vainio & schlickeiser 1998 ) . shock acceleration explains the cosmic ray energy spectrum up to the `` knee '' at @xmath110@xmath162 ev . the particles that stay in the shock longest end up with the most energy . the spectrum is a distribution function in the number of shock crossings , considering the continuous loss of particles that are trapped in the downstream flow ( e.g. , kato & takahara 2003 ) . observations of the edge sharpness of supernova remnants suggest the amplitude of mhd waves near the shock is @xmath160 times the average ism value ( achterberg , blandford & reynolds 1994 ) . simonetti ( 1992 ) observed a factor of at least 10 in the magnetic wave amplitude from faraday rotation irregularities in a supernova remnant compared with the adjacent line of sight . the x - ray synchrotron emission from supernova remnants is direct evidence for acceleration of relativistic electrons ( koyama et al . 1995 , aschenbach & leahy 1999 ) . a collection of particles with a high enough density can not stream along a magnetic field much faster than the alfvn speed because they generate magnetic irregularities that scatter them ( lerche 1967 ; wentzel 1968a , 1969 ; kulsrud & pearce 1969 ; tademaru 1969 ) . the growth rate of the instability at wavenumber @xmath26 for isotropic wave generation is ( cesarsky 1980 ) @xmath163 the first term in the parenthesis represents the stabilizing effect of wave damping from ion gyromotions . the second term drives the instability with a rate proportional to the ratio of the streaming speed to the alfvn speed . the influence of collective effects is in the ratio of the density of those cosmic rays that resonate with wavenumber @xmath26 to the background density of thermal ions . the size of the magnetic irregularity produced is about @xmath164 times the particle gyroradius ( @xmath110@xmath165 cm for gev energy and @xmath166gauss field ) , so more energetic particles make larger - scale field distortions . these distortions are not at the bottom of a turbulent cascade , so they should not be anisotropic ( chandran 2000a ) . they could cascade to give the ism scintillation . the upper limit to the cosmic ray energy that can generate waves sufficient for their own scattering is around 100 to 1000 gev ( cesarsky 1980 , yan & lazarian 2003a ) . much higher energies are possible in a galactic wind model where the boundary between diffusion and advection depends on energy and the streaming instability landau damps in a highly ionized galactic halo ( ptuskin et al . 1997 ) . hall ( 1980 ) suggested that waves generated by cosmic rays would damp quickly and proposed instead that scintillation - scale structures result from mirror and firehose instabilities in the hot ism phase . both require pressure anisotropies , which hall notes should arise at the level of 0.01 - 0.1 if the hot medium is turbulent . the firehose instability requires @xmath167 for parallel and perpendicular pressures @xmath168 and @xmath169 ( lerche 1966 , wentzel 1968b ) , and the mirror instability requires @xmath170 . these conditions are satisfied for anisotropy @xmath1710.010.1 if the plasma @xmath172 is very large , as might be the case in the hot intercloud medium if supernovae continuously sweep it free of gas and field . one of the earliest indications that the ism is turbulent came from scintillation observations of electron density fluctuations on very small scales . these fluctuations cause diffraction and refraction of radio signals from pulsars and a few extragalactic sources . diffraction broadens pulsar images , spreads out the pulse arrival times , and narrows the frequency interval over which the pulses have a coherent behavior . the relative motion of the diffracting medium also modulates the pulsar intensity on a timescale of minutes . refraction from larger structures causes the images to split or wander in position and to vary in intensity on timescales of days to months . scintillation effects like these offer many diagnostics for electron density structures in the ionized interstellar medium , including _ regions , hot bubble edges and the ionized and hot intercloud media . still , the origin of this turbulence is not clear . because the scales are very small , typically @xmath83 cm or below , it could be part of a cascade from larger structures past the viscous length and down into the collisionless regime of mhd turbulence ( section 4.11 in _ interstellar turbulence i _ ) , or it could be generated locally by cosmic ray streaming or other small - scale instabilities or by low - mass stellar winds and wakes ( sections 3 and [ sect : cr ] in _ interstellar turbulence i _ ) . here we review ism scintillations . more extensive reviews may be found in rickett ( 1977 , 1990 ) , hewish ( 1992 ) , and cordes , rickett & backer ( 1988 ) . the index of refraction for radio waves is ( nicholson 1983 ) @xmath173 with electron density @xmath174 , classical electron radius @xmath175 cm , and wavenumber of the radio signal @xmath176 for wavelength @xmath86 . the phase change of a signal that passes through a clump of size @xmath177 with an excess index of refraction @xmath178 compared with a neighboring average region is @xmath179 . the transmitted signal adds constructively to the neighboring signal at a relative propagation angle @xmath180 if the difference in their path lengths , @xmath181 , multiplied by @xmath26 , equals the phase change . this gives @xmath182 for small @xmath180 . this phase change is random for each clump the signal meets , so after @xmath183 such clumps on a path length @xmath184 , the root mean square angular change of the signal from diffraction is @xmath185 . the most important clump size has a cumulative scattering angle @xmath186 equal to the clump diffraction angle , @xmath187 . evaluation of @xmath188 requires some knowledge of how @xmath189 depends on @xmath177 . for a turbulent medium , this relation comes from the power spectrum of electron density fluctuations , @xmath190 where @xmath191 and @xmath192 for 3d turbulence with a kolmogorov spectrum ( we use @xmath193 here for the wavenumber of electron density fluctuations to distinguish it from the wavenumber @xmath26 of the radio radiation used for the observation ) . the mean squared electron density fluctuation is obtained from the integral over phase space volume , @xmath194 . for logarithmic intervals , this is approximately @xmath195 . thus , we have @xmath196 . using the wave equation , cordes , pidwerbetsky & lovelace ( 1986 ) got essentially the same result with @xmath197 replacing @xmath198 . the full theory more properly accounts for differences in the cumulative effects of the line - of - sight and transverse density variations . a recent modification considers power - law rather than gaussian statistics for the clump size distribution ( boldyrev & gwinn 2003 ) . for a reference set of parameters , e.g. , ghz frequencies , kpc distances , and typical @xmath199 meters@xmath200 , the characteristic scale is @xmath201 cm . this small size implies that only pulsars and a few extragalactic radio sources can produce detectible diffraction effects at radio frequencies . the smallness compared with the collisional mean free path of electrons also implies that the fluctuations have to be collisionless ( see _ interstellar turbulence i _ ) . many observable properties of small radio sources give information , either directly or indirectly , about @xmath177 , which can be used to infer the strength and power index of the electron density fluctuation spectrum and its distribution on the line of sight . for example , the logarithm of the visibility of an interferometer is @xmath202 where @xmath40 is the baseline length and @xmath203 is the scattering measure . spangler & cordes ( 1998 ) found @xmath204 using this baseline dependence for 4 pulsars . very long baseline interferometry ( vlbi ) observations of pulsar image sizes measure angular broadening as a function of frequency ( lee & jokipii 1975a ; cordes , pidwerbetsky & lovelace 1986 ) and determine @xmath205 ( spangler et al . for the reference parameters , @xmath206 mas . angular broadening gives a spread in path lengths for the radio waves , and this corresponds to a spread in arrival times of pulses , @xmath207 ( lee & jokipii 1975b ) . such pulse broadening scales as @xmath208 , so the frequency dependence gives @xmath101 and the absolute value gives @xmath205 for an assumed screen depth @xmath184 . the flux density is correlated only over a small range of frequencies , @xmath209 ( salpeter 1969 , lee & jokipii 1975b ) . pulsar amplitudes vary on a timescale @xmath210 several minutes as a result of pulsar transverse motions @xmath211 km s@xmath71 ( cordes 1986 ) . using the relations above , this can be rewritten @xmath212 . if pulsar distances and proper motions are also known , along with the dispersion measure , then the distribution of scattering material on the line of sight can be modeled ( harrison & lyne 1993 , cordes & rickett 1998 ) . longer time variations ( sieber 1982 ) result from the changing refraction of radio signals in moving structures that have the diffraction angular size @xmath213 or larger ( rickett , coles & bourgois 1984 ; blandford & narayan 1985 ) . this angular size corresponds to a physical size for the refracting elements @xmath214 . for typical @xmath215 mas , @xmath216 cm at @xmath217 kpc . the corresponding refraction scintillation time is @xmath218 days . time variations over months are also observed from larger interstellar structures . the relative rms amplitude of the source is the modulation index , @xmath219 . for diffraction this can be 100% , but for refraction it is typically less than @xmath130% ( stinebring & condon 1990 , labrecque et al . 1994 , stinebring et al . the modulation index depends on the strength of scattering , which involves a length scale equal to the geometric mean of the scale for angular broadening and the dominant scale for electron density fluctuations , @xmath220 . this is the fresnel length , @xmath221 , which is the transverse size of some object at distance @xmath184 that is just small enough to show diffraction effects . when @xmath222 is high , there are many diffracting elements of size @xmath223 inside each refracting element of size @xmath224 , so diffraction is strong . for weak diffraction , the total phase change on the line of sight is small and the dominant clump size is the fresnel length itself ( lovelace et al . 1970 , lee & jokipii 1975c , rickett 1990 ) . in this case , the modulation index scales approximately with @xmath225 ( lovelace et al . the modulation index measures interstellar properties in this weak limit because then @xmath226 , giving a diagnostic for @xmath227 and @xmath101 ( rickett 1977 ) . small @xmath94 usually corresponds to high frequencies , where diffraction is relatively unimportant . time variations can be visualized with a dynamic spectrum , which is a gray scale plot of intensity on a coordinate system of time versus frequency ( figure [ fig : dynamspect ] ) . diffraction alone gives a random dynamic spectrum from the motion of unresolved objects of size @xmath177 , but larger refractive structures , which disperse their radio frequencies over larger angles , @xmath228 ( from the above expression @xmath229 ) , sweep a spectrum of frequencies past the observer ( hewish 1980 ) . the intensity peaks on a dynamic spectrum ( averaged over many pulses ) then appear as streaks with slope @xmath230 ( cordes , pidwerbetsky & lovelace 1986 ) ; this can be used as a diagnostic for @xmath231 . the right - hand part of figure [ fig : dynamspect ] is the 2d power spectrum of the dynamic spectrum . stinebring et al . ( 2001 ) and hill et al . ( 2003 ) suggest that the arcs arise from interference between a central image and a faint scattering halo 2030 times larger . strong refraction can result in multiple images that produce interference fringes on a dynamic spectrum ( cordes & wolszczan 1986 ; rickett , lyne & gupta 1997 ) . multiple images imply that refraction , which determines the image separation , bends light more than diffraction , which determines the size . because large - scale fluctuations dominate refraction , this observation implies either @xmath232 , so that small wavenumbers dominate ( cordes , pidwerbetsky & lovelace 1986 ; romani , narayan & blandford 1986 ) , or there is additional structure on @xmath233 cm scales that is not part of a power law power spectrum ( rickett , lyne & gupta 1997 ) . radio scintillation has been used to determine many properties of electron density fluctuations in the ism . diffraction and refraction come from the same electrons , so the ratio of their strengths is proportional to the ratio of the amplitudes of the electron density fluctuations on two different scales . from this ratio armstrong , rickett & spangler ( 1995 ) derived the power spectrum of the fluctuations spanning @xmath234 orders of magnitude in scale . they determined @xmath235 m@xmath200 and @xmath192 between @xmath81 cm and @xmath236 cm . they also suggested from rotation measures ( rm@xmath237 ) that the same power law extends up to @xmath238 or @xmath239 cm . cordes , weisberg & boriakoff ( 1985 ) found @xmath240 using the relation between @xmath241 and @xmath86 . they mapped the spatial distribution of @xmath227 from @xmath241 observations of 31 pulsars , suggesting the galaxy contains both thin and thick disk components . for the thin component , @xmath242 m@xmath200 assuming @xmath192 and for the thick component , with @xmath243 kpc , @xmath244 m@xmath200 . the rms level of electron density fluctuations at the dominant scale @xmath201 cm , which comes from the integral over the power spectrum ( see above ) , was found to be @xmath245 @xmath64 for the high latitude medium , for which @xmath246 @xmath64 from dispersion measures , and @xmath247 @xmath64 for the low latitudes . bhat , gupta & rao ( 1998 ) observed 20 pulsars for three years to average over refraction variations and determined @xmath227 in the local ism from @xmath241 . they observed an excess of scattering material at the edge of the local bubble , which also produced multiple images of one of these pulsars ( gupta , bhat & rao 1999 ) . the edge of the local bubble may also have been seen by rickett , kedziora - chudczer & jauncey ( 2002 ) as a source of scattering in a quasar . bhat & gupta ( 2002 ) found a similar enhancement at the edge of loop i , where @xmath248 pc m@xmath200 and the density enhancement is a factor of @xmath1100 over the surrounding gas . they also found excess scattering for more distant pulsars from the sagittarius spiral arm . lazio & cordes ( 1998a , b ) used the angular sizes of radio sources and other information on lines of sight to the galactic center and outer galaxy to suggest that the scattering material is associated with the surfaces of molecular clouds . ionized cloud edges were also suggested by rickett , lyne & gupta ( 1997 ) to explain multiple images . spangler & cordes ( 1998 ) observed @xmath249 from small sources behind six regions in the cygnus ob1 association and found an excess in sm that was correlated with the emission measure , indicating again that scattering is associated with _ h ii _ regions . this result is consistent with the high cooling rate required by the dissipation of this turbulence , which implies high temperatures ( zweibel , ferriere & shull 1988 ; spangler 1991 ; minter & spangler 1997 ) . the relation @xmath250 combined with pulsar distances and proper motions led gupta ( 1995 ) to determine a 1 kpc scale height for the scattering layer from long - term observations of 59 pulsars . cordes & rickett ( 1998 ) also used this method to find that scattering is rather uniformly distributed toward two pulsars , but for three lines of sight it was concentrated toward the pulsar , including vela where the supernova remnant is known to contribute to the scattering ( desai et al . 1992 ) ; six other pulsars in that study had significant scattering from either a foreground spiral arm or _ h ii _ regions . bhat , gupta & rao ( 1999 ) compared @xmath251 obtained from @xmath241 with the angular size of the refraction pattern , @xmath252 from dynamic spectra . they showed that @xmath253 for all 25 pulsars that had this data , implying that diffraction dominates refraction and therefore @xmath254 . they also compared @xmath227 from @xmath255 on the refractive scale with @xmath227 from @xmath241 on the diffractive scale to determine the slope of the power spectrum directly ( as did armstrong et al . 1995 ) . they found the kolmogorov value @xmath192 to within the accuracy in most cases , but six pulsars , mostly nearby , gave slightly higher @xmath256 . the longest - term variations had significantly more power than an extrapolation of the kolmogorov spectrum , however , and the modulation indices were large , leading them to suggest an additional component of scattering electrons at scales of @xmath257 to @xmath83 cm . the same data led bhat , rao & gupta ( 1999 ) to derive @xmath258 m@xmath200 and @xmath259 , indicating strong scattering . lambert & rickett ( 2000 ) looked at the correlation between the modulation index for long - term variations from refraction and the relative decorrelation bandwidth , @xmath260 , which comes from diffraction . the correlation at 610 mhz for 28 sources fit kolmogorov scaling ( @xmath192 ) better than a shock - dominated model ( @xmath261 ) model but at 100 mhz the kolmogorov fit was not as good . they suggested that the minimum turbulent length was large , @xmath262 to @xmath233 cm instead of @xmath263 cm ( armstrong , rickett & spangler 1995 ) . an excess of electron density structure at large scales could also explain the discrepancy . stinebring et al . ( 2000 ) monitored the modulation index of 21 pulsars for five years and found low values ( @xmath264% ) that bracket @xmath265 with no perceptible inner ( smallest ) scale for most of the pulsars . for the crab , vela , and four others , enhanced modulation indices were consistent with an inner scale of @xmath262 cm . rickett , lyne & gupta ( 1997 ) suggested this excess scattering could be from au - sized ionized clumps at cloud edges . an inner scale of @xmath266 cm was found by spangler & gwinn ( 1990 ) after noting that interferometer baselines shorter than this had scintillation with @xmath2674 whereas longer baselines had @xmath101 near the kolmogorov value , @xmath268 . they suggested the inner scale is caused by a lack of turbulence smaller than the ion gyroradius , @xmath269 for thermal speed @xmath270 , or by the ion inertial length , @xmath271 , whichever is larger . this value of the inner scale is consistent with an origin of the scattering in the warm ionized medium or in _ h ii _ regions , but not in the hot coronal medium , which has much larger minimum lengths . shishov et al . ( 2003 ) studied pulsar psr b0329 + 54 over a wide range of frequencies and found a power spectrum for electron density fluctuations with a slope of @xmath272 for lengths between @xmath2 cm and @xmath273 cm . this spectrum is expected for turbulence in the iroshnikov - kraichnan model ( see _ interstellar turbulence i _ ) . shishov et al . noted how other lines of sight though the galaxy gave different spectra and suggested that the nature of the turbulence varies from place to place . they also found refraction effects on a scale of @xmath274 cm corresponding to electron density fluctuations of strength @xmath275 @xmath64 and suggested these were neutral clouds with an overall filling factor of @xmath10.1 . scattering image anisotropy suggests anisotropic turbulence ( see _ interstellar turbulence i _ ) . lo et al . ( 1993 ) observed 2:1 anisotropy in images of sgr a@xmath276 , wilkinson , narayan & spencer ( 1994 ) found scale - dependent anisotropic images of cygnus x-3 , frail et al . ( 1994 ) observed 3:1 anisotropy in scattering of light from galactic center oh / ir stars , whereas trotter , moran & rodriguez ( 1998 ) observed axial ratios of 1.21.5 for quasar light that scatters through a local _ h ii _ region . a ratio of 4:1 was found for another quasar by rickett , kedziora - chudczer & jauncey ( 2002 ) . spangler & cordes ( 1998 ) observed anisotropic scattering with axial ratio of 1.8 surrounding the cygnus ob association and desai & fey ( 2001 ) observed axial ratios of @xmath11.3 toward the same region . the actual anisotropy of local fluctuations can not be determined from these observations because many different orientations blend on the line of sight ( chandran & backer 2002 ) extreme scattering events are observed in some extragalactic radio sources and a few pulsars . their modulation is strong , @xmath277% , they can last for several months , and they have light profiles that are flat - bottom with spikes at the end , or smooth bottom with no spikes ( fiedler et al . 1994 ) . they may result from supernova shocks viewed edge - on ( romani , blandford & cordes 1987 ) or ionized cloud edges in the galaxy halo ( walker & wardle 1998 ) . some appear correlated with the edges of local radio loops ( fiedler et al . 1994 , lazio et al . 2000 ) , in support of the shock model . the actual scattering process could be a combination of refractive defocusing , during which an intervening electron cloud produces a lens that diverges the light and makes the source dimmer ( romani et al . 1987 , clegg et al . 1998 ) , or stochastic broadening by an excess of turbulence in a small cloud ( fiedler et al . lazio et al . ( 2000 ) found an excess @xmath278 kpc m@xmath200 associated with an event , corresponding to @xmath279 m@xmath200 for ratio @xmath280 of the line - of - sight extent ( @xmath184 ) to the transverse extent . fiedler et al . ( 1994 ) suggested @xmath281 @xmath64 . this high level of scattering along with an observed increase in angular size during the brightness minimum ( lazio et al . 2000 ) suggests the scattering cloud is not part of a power spectrum of turbulence but is an additional au - size feature ( lazio et al . 2000 ) . the amplitude , slope , and anisotropy of the power spectrum of interstellar electron density fluctuations have been observed by scintillation experiments . estimates for the inner scale of these fluctuations range from @xmath54 cm to @xmath262 cm or more . the shorter of these lengths is about the ion gyroradius in the warm ionized medium ( spangler & gwinn 1990 ) . this is much smaller than the mean free path for electron collisions so the fluctuations are collisionless ( see _ interstellar turbulence i _ ) . a lower limit to the largest scale of @xmath110@xmath282 cm was inferred from rotation measures assuming a continuous power law for fluctuations , but this assumption is uncertain . the slope of the power spectrum is usually close to the kolmogorov value , @xmath268 , and distinct from the slope for a field of discontinuities , which is @xmath283 . deviations from the kolmogorov slope appear in some studies , and may be from a large inner scale , @xmath284 cm , an excess of scattering sites having size @xmath1110 au , or a transition in the scaling properties of the turbulence . scintillation arises from both the low - density , diffuse , ionized ism and the higher - density _ h ii _ regions , ionized cloud edges , and hot shells , where the amplitude of the power spectrum increases . on average , the relative fluctuations are extremely small , @xmath285 on scales that dominate the diffraction at ghz radio frequencies , @xmath286 cm ( cordes et al . 1985 ) . for a kolmogorov spectrum , they would be larger on larger scales in proportion to @xmath287 ; if the spectrum is continuous up to pc scales , the absolute fluctuation amplitude there would be @xmath11 ( lee & jokipii 1976 ) . anisotropy of scattered images is at the level of 50% , which is consistent with extremely large intrinsic anisotropies ( @xmath288 ) from mhd turbulence ( sections 4.11 and 4.13 in _ interstellar turbulence i _ ) if many orientations on the line of sight are blended together . the turbulence that is observed directly on resolvable scales in the ism also has important effects on very small scales , down to the level of atomic diffusion , mixing , and viscosity , and continuing far below to the thermal ion gyroradius . the resolvable turbulence in the neutral medium was reviewed in the first part of this series ( _ interstellar turbulence i _ ) , along with general theory and simulations . the smaller scale implications were reviewed here . turbulence helps to disperse the elements made in supernovae and other stellar sources by stretching and folding the contaminated gas until the gradient length approaches the collision mean free path . then atomic diffusion does the final step of interatomic mixing . this mixing and homogenization may occur partly at the source , in the shock fronts and contact discontinuities around the expanding flow following dynamical instabilities , and it may occur partly in the ambient ism after the expansion subsides . observations suggest that the dispersion in elemental abundances among stars inside clusters and field stars of the same age , and the abundance differences between hii regions and diffuse clouds , are only a few percent up to perhaps 30% . observations of clusters also suggest that most of the mixing occurs within several times @xmath2 years . this homogenization has to occur between the injection scale of supernovae and superbubble explosions and the star formation scale containing on the order of a solar mass . the corresponding range of spatial scales is @xmath289 for gas at the ambient density . homogenization can not be significant on scales much larger than a superbubble , because then it would diminish the galactic radial abundance gradient over a hubble time . these gradients enter the problem in another way too because turbulence mixes the gas over galactic radius to increase the elemental dispersion locally at the same time as it mixes this gas locally and leads to homogenization . while the distribution of elemental abundances appears to be fairly narrow , with a dispersion on the order of 10% , it may also have a fat tail caused by occasional odd stars and diffuse clouds with very different abundances . this tail is reminiscent of other fat tails in the distribution functions for turbulent media , and these other tails seem to originate with intermittency . in the case of elemental dispersion , this means that the homogenization process is spotty so some regions survive for long periods of time with very little mixing . several methods for studying turbulent mixing have been employed . because of the wide range of scales involved , these studies often employ simplifying assumptions that appear to capture the essential physics . they include artificial stochastic velocity fields and closure methods using moment equations . direct numerical simulations of ism elemental dispersion have only just begun . the theory suggests that a turbulent medium mixes passive scalars like elemental abundances faster than a gaussian velocity field because of the long - range correlations that are associated with turbulence . turbulence affects interstellar chemistry by mixing regions with different properties , heating the gas intermittently on the viscous scale , and enhancing ion - neutral collisions in regions with strong magnetic field gradients . turbulent mixing is more far - reaching than diffusive mixing because of long - range correlated motions in a turbulent flow . such mixing spreads out each chemical species over a large radial range inside a cloud . turbulent heating promotes temperature - sensitive reactions inside otherwise cold clouds . applications to the formation of ch@xmath59 and oh in diffuse clouds look promising . chemical reaction networks that include these turbulent processes are only beginning to understand some of the implications , and direct simulations of chemistry in a turbulent medium are limited to only a few studies so far . the scattering and acceleration of cosmic rays depends strongly on the presence of turbulence in the ism . the scale for this turbulence is the gyroradius , which is less than the collisional mean free path for most cosmic rays , which have energies less than 1 gev . thus , scattering relies entirely on magnetic irregularities in collisionless plasma turbulence . cosmic ray acceleration is by two processes , both of which involve turbulence : the first - order fermi mechanism accelerates cosmic rays by cycling them through shock fronts where they pick up a relative velocity kick comparable to the shock speed at each passage . this cycling occurs because magnetic irregularities on each side of the front scatter the out - streaming cosmic rays back into the front . the second - order fermi mechanism accelerates cosmic rays through turbulent diffusion . each collision with a randomly moving magnetic irregularity turns the cosmic ray around with a reflection speed in the moving frame that is comparable to the incident speed . over time , the result is a transfer of energy from the turbulence to the cosmic rays . cosmic ray scattering occurs in several ways . fast moving particles can interact weakly but resonantly with numerous magnetic irregularities , and successive interactions of this type can randomly change the pitch angles of their helical motions along the field . this eventually leads to a complete reversal in the direction of motion . cosmic rays can also interact strongly with large magnetic irregularities , as would occur in shock fronts and at the edges of dense cloud complexes . these interactions change the particle directions significantly each time . the nature of cosmic ray diffusion in both momentum and space is not understood well because the structure and strength of the important magnetic irregularities are not observed directly . if mhd turbulence is highly anisotropic on the scale of cosmic ray scattering , with transverse irregularities much stronger than parallel as suggested by theory , then resonant scattering processes during motions along the mean field can be very weak . the structure of magnetic waves below the mean free path is also unclear , as the usual fast and slow magnetosonic modes do not exist . cosmic rays can also generate turbulence by streaming instabilities following particle - wave resonances or by fire - hose and mirror instabilities that operate even without resonances . the expected anisotropy of alfvn wave turbulence diminishes the first of these mechanisms significantly , however . the others are problematic because they require strong cosmic ray pressure anisotropies . as a result , the impact of cosmic rays on turbulence is currently not understood . radio wave scintillation is indirect evidence for interstellar plasma turbulence . these radio observations span a very wide range of spatial scales through a combination of diffraction and refraction effects . the scales are mostly below the collision mean free path , and they are far below the limits of angular resolution . the first of these limits makes it difficult to understand the origin of the density irregularities . unlike the turbulence that scatters cosmic rays , which requires only magnetic irregularities and no density structure , the turbulence that causes scintillation requires small - scale density irregularities in the ionized medium . the associated magnetic irregularities are not observed , and the connection to cosmic ray scattering is unclear , even though the length scales are about the same . the origin of density structures below the collision mean free path is unknown . atomic diffusion should smooth them out on a sound crossing time unless magnetic field irregularities hold them in place . in that case they could be the result of slight temperature variations , with the cooler regions having higher electron densities , all divided up and mixed together by transverse magnetic motions . the nature of these motions below the mean free path is unclear , because , as mentioned above , the usual fast and slow compressional modes do not exist , nor do the usual thermal and pressure - regulated processes . the second of the two limits on spatial scale imply that the geometrical properties of scintillation turbulence are difficult to observe . the scintillation is clearly anisotropic , but whether it is in sheets or filaments , for example , is unknown . the importance of scintillation observations for studies of ism turbulence is that they give the power spectrum of electron density fluctuations fairly accurately . this is usually close to the kolmogorov spectrum of incompressible turbulence . rarely are the spectra so steep that the medium can be interpreted as a superposition of sharp edges , like shock fronts . one recent observation with fairly high precision obtained the relatively shallow iroshnikov - kraichnan power spectrum , leading to the conjecture that the slope varies from region to region . as discussed in _ interstellar turbulence i _ , this variation may arise from a variation in the relative strength of the magnetic field compared to the turbulent motions , with the iroshnikov - kraichnan spectrum present in regions of relatively strong fields . observations suggest that scintillation arises in a distributed fashion from the ambient ionized medium and also from discrete high - density places like the edges of local bubbles , ionized molecular clouds , and hii regions . these discrete regions are likely to be highly turbulent and they also have a juxtaposition of hot and cool gas , which is necessary for isentropic mixing and electron density structure . there are evidently many uncertainties in the nature of ism turbulence on small scales , even though the evidence for this turbulence is pervasive . part of the problem is that none of the features of this turbulence have been observed directly : not the densities , magnetic fields , temperatures , or motions . still , the density irregularities are revealed indirectly through scintillation , the magnetic field irregularities through cosmic ray scattering , the temperature fluctuations through chemistry , and the motions through elemental and chemical mixing . an additional problem is that many small scale effects of ism turbulence rely on details of the theory that are independent of the usual scaling relations , such as viscous heating and elemental diffusion , which arise at the bottom of the cascade in the neutral medium . turbulence in the ionized medium is also below the collisional mean free path , where pressure and thermal effects are relatively unimportant . moreover , the small scale ism processes are often strongly dependent on the large scale processes , such as turbulent shock formation , energy and metal injection , and galactic - scale gradients . this means that direct simulations of small scale turbulence are impossible without simplifying assumptions about the large - scale medium assumptions that require more knowledge about ism turbulence on the large scale than is presently available . while the observations and theory of ism turbulence have come a long way from the first efforts in the 1950s , the details of this new information have led to a growing awareness that the complete problem is far too large to solve any time soon . we rely on future generations of astronomers and physicists to continue this work , and hope that they find this field as intriguing and challenging as we do today . we are grateful to a. brandenburg , d. lambert , f. matteucci , s. oey , and g. tenorio - tagle for helpful comments on section 2 ; e. falgarone , d. hollenbach and j. le bourlot for helpful comments on section 3 ; b. chandran , r. jokipii , a. lazarian , v.s . ptuskin , and r. schlickeiser for helpful comments on section 4 ; b. rickett , s. spangler , and d. stinebring for helpful comments on section 5 and to a. hill for figure [ fig : dynamspect ] . Abstract:

Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.

Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered . Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video . Paper: wireless networks are ubiquitous and are on their way to become even more prevalent , e.g. , with the advent of internet - of - things . wireless communication is , however , particularly challenging to model algorithmically . in two crucial interrelated aspects , wireless networks on the ground differ from models typically assumed in algorithmic studies . one is the _ communication modeling _ : when is a transmission successfully decoded , as a function of the environment and the _ interference _ from other transmissions . the other is _ variability with time _ : wireless networks are particularly susceptible to changes . both of these are hard to capture accurately with well - defined , clear - cut rules . we aim in this paper to address core information dissemination problems _ local broadcast _ and ( global ) _ broadcast _ in dynamic distributed networks , under very weak assumptions on the communication . to this end , we propose a communication model with significant flexibility that allows for adversarial control , generalizing essentially all known analytic wireless models . it allows for more general interference relationships than treated before . the network can experience adversarial dynamic behavior , both edge changes ( change of signal strengths ) and node insertions / deletions . wireless communication has traditionally been modeled theoretically by graphs , either geometric or general . interference is then also transmitted on graph edges ( precluding a node from receiving a message from a neighbor if another neighbor is transmitting ) , but is sometimes represented by a supergraph . _ fading channel _ or _ physical _ models common in communication engineering , on the other hand , consider interference as cumulative , decreasing with distance but adding up . they have been popular in recent algorithmic studies , adding more realism to the formulation . the standard assumption of _ geometric signal decay _ ( that signal decreases inverse polynomially with distance ) in the sinr model , the prototypical fading channel , is though equally at odds with experimental evidence . ultimately , it may prove futile to hope for a clean deterministic model , or even a purely stochastic one , without a significant dose of unpredictability and non - determinism . wireless communication is commonly closely linked to mobility , as the transceivers are more often than not on the move . dynamic changes to reception conditions have many causes other than node mobility , since almost any changes in the environment affect transmissions due to reflections of signals over multiple paths , antenna characteristics , scattering , and diffraction . these changes are by nature hard to predict , even when assuming a `` mobility model '' . the most robust approach would then be to assume a non - trivial adversarial component . while the study of algorithms in dynamic networks has a long history , little has been done in cases where interference plays a role . * setting and model*. nodes are distributed and autonomous . there is no built - in structure and the nodes have no information besides bounds on model parameters and an upper bound on the number of nodes . communication is locally synchronous , but there is no global clock . we will assume a very general model for when nodes successfully communicate . nodes are located in space , with separation between points given by the relative decrease in strength of signal ( or interference ) sent between the points . this induces a metric space , when these decays are raised to the appropriate power actually , it is a _ quasi - metric _ , since symmetry need not hold . for distributed computation to be possible , the quasi - metric must have _ bounded independence _ ( to be defined precisely ) . _ edge changes _ can occur , with some restrictions , which are changes in the signal strength between the pair of points . the rule for when communication is successful is only partially pre - specified : transmission succeeds on a `` clear channel '' . that is , if a sender is within a _ communication radius _ from the receiver , if no other node transmits within a ( larger ) radius , and if the combined interference from all other transmitting nodes is ( quite ) small , then the transmission succeeds . otherwise , success is up to the adversary , or it can be further specified by the particular model assumptions desired . this captures essentially all known algorithmic wireless models ( including quasi - unit disc graphs , unit - ball graphs , bounded - independence graphs , @xmath0-hop extensions , and sinr ) . the only exception is the radio network model with general graphs , which can not be extended to involve comprehensive interference without a major hit in time complexity . the generality of our model is a key feature . given the vagaries of actual wireless environments , it is preferable for robustness reasons to make minimal assumptions about the communication model . a conservative approach is then to seek algorithms that work in most established models rather than depending on model - specific factors that simplify the life of the algorithm designer . [ [ dynamic - network - model ] ] dynamic network model + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + the network is dynamic , both in terms of nodes and links . nodes can come and go , potentially adversarially . this includes the situation where nodes are wakened by other nodes . we only expect nodes that have been awake for long enough ( logarithmic number of rounds ) to participate in the computation , i.e. , the _ stable _ nodes . in the _ local broadcast _ problem , all stable nodes should inform all of their ( stable ) neighbors ( i.e. , within the communication radius ) . in the _ broadcast _ problem , the nodes in the network are to be informed of a message that initially resides at a source node . the network need not be connected at any instant in time , but we need to make assumptions about what transient paths are usable by an algorithm operating under interference . this leads to a definition of a _ dynamic diameter _ of the network , that becomes the competitive objective for the time complexity . * our approach and results*. the key algorithmic technique is a natural randomized _ contention balancing _ procedure , where a node continuously adjusts its transmission probability based on the interference that it senses . it allows nodes to stabilize quickly from any initial conditions , or after waking up . this routine is a variation on an old story , a simple backoff procedure to manage local contention : _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ if a node @xmath1 senses contention in a given round beyond a fixed threshold , then @xmath1 halves its transmission probability in the next round and otherwise doubles it . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ our main technical contribution is to show logarithmic - round convergence of this method to a steady state of nearly balanced contention , from an arbitrary starting configuration and in the presence of network changes . it proves also to be surprisingly tolerant of different communication models . the higher level algorithms are then built on top of this primitive . a crucial component is the use of _ carrier sense _ to detect the cumulative amount of signals in the air . since it is supplied by the cheapest available hardware today as rss ( received signal strength ) readings , we posit that carrier - sense capability should be the default assumption in wireless algorithmics ( while exploring the necessity of different assumptions is interesting theoretically ) . as carrier - sense indicators can provide fine - grained information , we are interested in restraining its use and identifying which aspects are necessary to achieve the results obtained . to this end , we identify several _ primitives _ that carrier - sense can supply , restrict the algorithm to use only a subset of the primitives , and examine which of these are truly necessary . the local broadcast algorithm simply runs the contention balancing procedure , with nodes bowing out when they are sure to have completed their transmission . the broadcast algorithms are based on sparsifying the instance , so that only nodes of constant density actually participate in the global broadcast action . the former is achieved in @xmath2 time , where @xmath3 is the maximum number of neighbors that a node can have , while the latter takes @xmath4 rounds , where @xmath5 is a dynamic diameter . these dissemination algorithms are efficient enough to improve on some of the results known for static versions of the problems . the local broadcast algorithm is strongly optimal , or within constant factors on every instance . in the standard setting ( static , spontaneous case ) , the algorithm is _ uniform _ , in that it need not know the network size . the broadcast algorithm is also optimal and uniform in the same setting , while in the non - spontaneous setting it is faster by a logarithmic factor than the previous algorithm of @xcite that however does not require carrier sense . * closely related work*. there are two largely disjoint bodies of work of wireless algorithmic results , with work on fading models like sinr slowly catching up with the better studied graph - based models . one approach for capturing more realism in sinr model is to move beyond euclidean metrics @xcite , even to general ones @xcite . one can view relative signal decrease as implicitly defining a quasi - distance metric @xcite . link scheduling problems can be formulated on edge - weighted interference graphs @xcite that properly generalize both graph - based and sinr models , linked by a graph - theoretic parameter . distributed dissemination problems , however , necessarily require metric restrictions , such as doubling or _ fading _ metrics @xcite , and limits on communication abilities in order to capture both types of models . the local broadcast and global broadcast problems have been extensively studied in both graph - based radio network models @xcite and the sinr model @xcite . for local broadcast , the best results known in the radio network model are both @xmath6 with and without knowing ( an upper bound on ) @xmath3 @xcite . in the sinr model , with knowledge of @xmath3 , the local broadcast can be accomplished in the same time bound as in the radio network model @xcite . if @xmath3 is not known , the best result is @xmath7 @xcite , which is improved to @xmath2 with free acknowledgments @xcite . this can be further improved to @xmath8 in the spontaneous case , when @xmath3 is known @xcite . the time complexity of non - spontaneous broadcasting in the radio network model is @xmath9 @xcite without collision detection . with collision detection , this lower bound was recently broken in @xcite , where a solution of @xmath10 was given . broadcasting has also been treated in the sinr model under a variety of assumptions . some are stronger than ours ( location information @xcite , power control @xcite ) , while others relax the assumption about the connectivity property , incurring necessarily much higher complexity @xcite . results in our setting , but without carrier sensing , include time complexity of @xmath11 @xcite ( see also @xcite ) , where @xmath12 denotes the maximum ratio between distances of stations connected in the communication graph ; and @xmath13 @xcite . in the spontaneous setting , where the nodes can build an overlay structure along which the message is then propagated , scheideler et al . @xcite used carrier sense to give a dominator algorithms , which can be applied to solve broadcast in @xmath14 rounds . yu et al . @xcite solved the problem in the same time bound using power control , while the algorithm in @xcite that requires neither power control nor carrier sense runs in time @xmath15 . these problems have also been treated in dynamic networks . in the _ unstructured _ model @xcite , where nodes may wake up asynchronously ( modeling the node insertion ) , the local broadcast problem is well studied , even in the sinr setting @xcite , but this model does not consider node deletion . in the _ dual graph _ model @xcite ( originally due to @xcite ) , both the local broadcast @xcite and global broadcast @xcite problems are studied . but this model involves only edge behavior and not node changes ( churn ) . hence , the impact of dynamicity on wireless information dissemination is still largely unexplored . considering wireless interference , there are two classes of wireless network models : graph - based and physical models . basically , the graph - based models define a local and binary type of interference , while the physical models consider fading effect of signal on wireless channels . there are many widely used graph - based models , such as the unit disc graph ( udg ) model @xcite ( unit ball graph ( ubg ) model @xcite ) , the quasi unit disc graph ( qudg ) model @xcite , the protocol model @xcite , the bounded - independence graph ( big ) model @xcite and the @xmath0-hop variants of the above models @xcite . physical models , also known as sinr models @xcite , capture the missing practical issues in wireless interference , such as fading and cumulativeness of wireless interference . most of current works in the sinr model focus on networks embedded in euclidean space , while many of the results hold also for doubling or `` bounded growth '' metrics @xcite . those doubling metrics constrain growth at every ( or arbitrarily small ) granularity , while ours only bounds regions proportional to the transmission range , in particular capturing bounded independence graphs ( big ) . all above models are included by our proposed communication model as shown in sec . [ sec : primitiveproofs ] . for more on wireless models , please refer to @xcite . more detailed related work is introduced in sec . [ drw ] . * our contributions*. we have obtained generalized and improved algorithms for two of the most fundamental dissemination problems , in some cases improving the best results known in static settings . beyond these specific results , we identify the following technical contributions : _ unified model of wireless networks_. the model proposed appears to be the first that allows for the development of pan - model distributed dissemination algorithms . this hopefully prompts further studies crossing the artificial boundary between graph- and fading - based models . _ dynamic networks under interference_. this appears to be the first work to address dynamic networks in the presence of comprehensive interference . _ uniform algorithms_. our algorithms in the static spontaneous setting appear to be the first in fading models that work independent of instance parameters ( number of nodes , max . degree ) . _ primitives for carrier - sense . _ we introduce several primitives or _ capabilities _ that can be implemented using environmental sensing , and propose to study the power of such primitives . _ stabilization mechanisms . _ we identify contention adaptation as a fundamental ability in wireless networks , that appears to be of crucial value to implement other distributed tasks . * roadmap*. the formal model and basic definitions , including the definitions of communication model and carrier sensing primitives , are given in sec . [ sec : model ] . [ sec : balancingcontention ] contains the core technical part of the paper that includes the basic contention balance routine and its analysis . the main results concerning local and global broadcast problems are presented in sections [ sec : localbroadcast ] and [ sec : broadcast ] , respectively . due to space constraints , most proofs are relegated to appendices . we consider a dynamic network of point - size wireless devices ( nodes ) . nodes can transmit messages in time slots / rounds that are sufficiently long to allow a transmission of a single message . no global clock or synchronization of rounds is required , but the clocks of different nodes run at a similar rate , i.e. , the length of a round differs between nodes at most by a factor of 2 . nodes may arrive and leave the network at any time . unless specified otherwise , the nodes are assumed to work _ non - spontaneously _ : they can initially be in sleep state and join the execution of an algorithm only after receiving a message . we say a node is _ alive _ at some point in time if it is present in the network . we assume the total number of nodes in the network is polynomially bounded by a number @xmath16 in each round . we use @xmath17 to denote the set of alive nodes at any fixed point in time and also use @xmath16 to denote the current number of nodes , i.e. @xmath18 . we assume all nodes use the same transmission power @xmath19 for communication in all rounds . _ metrics_. the _ signal strength _ or _ interference _ , depending on context of transmitting node @xmath20 on a node @xmath1 is @xmath21 , where @xmath22 is the _ path loss _ from @xmath20 to @xmath1 . the _ metricity _ of a space @xmath23 is the smallest number @xmath24 such that for every triplet @xmath25 , @xmath26 @xcite . we define @xmath27 if @xmath20 and @xmath1 are different nodes and @xmath28 when @xmath29 . note that @xmath30 is a _ quasi - metric _ , as all metric axioms except symmetry hold . in the rest of the paper , we assume that in each round the metricity of the network is bounded by a fixed constant @xmath24 and will work with values @xmath31 instead of @xmath32 . we assume the quasi - metric @xmath30 has _ bounded independence _ , defined below , roughly stating that there can not be many nodes each causing high interference to a _ fixed _ node , while having low mutual interferences . first , some notations . the _ ball _ with radius @xmath33 centered at @xmath20 is defined as @xmath34 . the _ in - ball _ with radius @xmath33 centered at @xmath20 is defined as @xmath35 ; clearly , @xmath36 . a set @xmath37 is a @xmath33-_packing _ for set @xmath38 if balls of radius @xmath33 centered at nodes in @xmath39 are contained in @xmath38 and are disjoint . @xmath39 is a @xmath40-_cover _ for @xmath38 if the union of balls of radius @xmath40 centered at nodes in @xmath39 contains @xmath38 . note that any maximal @xmath33-packing is a @xmath41-cover , and thus one can bound sizes of covers by packings . we say that @xmath30 has @xmath42-_bounded independence _ , for given @xmath43 and @xmath44 , if for every @xmath45 and every in - ball @xmath46 of radius @xmath47 , the size of a maximum cardinality @xmath48-packing of @xmath46 is at most @xmath49 , where @xmath50 is a constant , possibly depending on @xmath51 . for instance , the euclidean plane is @xmath52-bounded independent , for every @xmath33 . _ neighborhoods , communication graph and dissemination problems_. let @xmath53 denote the maximum transmission distance possible when no other node transmits . as the latter event is arguably very rare , we define the _ communication radius _ @xmath54 as a slightly smaller distance , where @xmath55 is a _ precision _ parameter . we will drop the parameter @xmath55 whenever it is fixed and clear from the context . fix a round @xmath56 . the _ neighborhood _ of a node is @xmath57 , describing who @xmath20 can communicate with directly . the basic operation of interest is when @xmath20 broadcasts a message to its neighbors @xmath58 . the _ communication graph _ is a directed graph @xmath59 , where @xmath60 if and only if @xmath61 . thus , the sequence @xmath62 defines a _ dynamic graph_. the _ vicinity _ of @xmath20 refers to a larger region , @xmath63 , for a parameter @xmath64 . the data dissemination problems that we consider are defined below . we say that a node @xmath20 _ mass - delivers _ in round @xmath56 if it transmits and all its neighbors ( @xmath58 ) receive the message . in the _ local broadcast _ problem , given a node @xmath20 , it is required to minimize the time from the beginning of the algorithm until node @xmath20 mass - delivers at least once , assuming it stays alive during that time . in the _ ( global ) broadcast _ problem , given a distinguished _ source _ node that initially holds a message , the goal is to minimize the time needed to deliver the message to every node in the network through multihop transmissions . _ one hop communication_. when is a transmission successfully received ? suppose a node @xmath20 transmits in round @xmath56 , and let @xmath39 be the set of concurrently transmitting nodes . let @xmath65 and @xmath66 be parameters that depend on the precision @xmath55 . ( , success on a clear channel ) if no other node in @xmath67 transmits _ and _ the total interference at node @xmath20 is at most @xmath68 ( i.e. @xmath69 and @xmath70 ) , then the transmission of node @xmath20 is successfully received by _ all _ its neighbors ( @xmath58 ) . otherwise , the reception is under adversarial control . _ randomized algorithms_. we mainly consider randomized algorithms of the following form : in each round @xmath56 , node @xmath1 makes a transmission with probability @xmath71 , independent of other nodes transmissions in that round . an important notion for the analysis of such algorithms is _ local contention _ , the sum of the transmission probabilities in a close region . the contention in the _ close neighborhood _ of a node @xmath1 in round @xmath56 is @xmath72 , where the radius @xmath73 allows all pair of nodes in @xmath74 to potentially communicate . also , let @xmath75 denote the contention in the larger _ vicinity _ of @xmath1 in round @xmath56 ( @xmath76 will be fixed later ) . we will also use the notation @xmath77 to denote the interference at @xmath1 from nodes outside its vicinity ( in @xmath78 ) in round @xmath56 . the expected value of @xmath77 is @xmath79 . _ sensing primitives_. we assume the nodes have abilities to sense activity on the channel . namely , we assume the nodes are able to detect high and low contention in their vicinity , detect ( under some conditions ) whether their transmission in a given round succeeded and detect a single very near transmission . in the following , we formalize these notions in three primitives : , and . we show in sec . [ sec : primitiveproofs ] how _ all _ these primitives can be implemented with _ basic _ physical carrier sensing and possibly also with other means . ( ) . contention can be probabilistically deduced from measured level of radio activity . we want to relax this ability and will use the following variant , where the outcome of is one of the two values : busy or idle channel . formally , for each node @xmath1 and round @xmath56 : if contention among close neighbors is high ( @xmath80 ) then they _ all _ detect busy channel in round @xmath56 with probability at least @xmath81 , for given @xmath82 , where @xmath83 is a constant , if the contention in the vicinity of @xmath1 is low ( @xmath84 ) _ and _ the interference on @xmath1 from outside its vicinity is above a threshold ( @xmath85 ) then @xmath1 detects idle channel in round @xmath56 with probability at least @xmath86 , for given @xmath87 , where @xmath88 and @xmath89 are constants . if a node @xmath20 has the = ( @xmath55 ) primitive ( depending on the precision parameter @xmath55 ) then : if @xmath20 transmits in round @xmath56 , the interference at @xmath20 is bounded by @xmath90 and the transmission is received by all nodes in @xmath91 , then the outcome of is 1 , where @xmath90 is a parameter . if the transmission is not received by a node @xmath92 then the outcome is @xmath93 . otherwise , the outcome is @xmath93 or @xmath94 , adversarially . ( ) . with = ( @xmath55 ) primitive , a node is able to detect if a transmitter is very close , assuming that it receives the transmitted message . the outcome of is @xmath94 for node @xmath1 in round @xmath56 if @xmath1 _ receives _ a transmission from a node @xmath20 , @xmath95 . otherwise , the outcome of is @xmath93 . this can also be made approximate . _ dynamicity_. we consider a dynamic network where the topology may change adversarially in each round due to node churn ( node arrivals / departures ) and edge changes . we assume that arriving nodes start running the algorithms from an initial configuration , so we do not limit the rate of churn . with edge changes , existing nodes that were not neighbors before , may become neighbors ( e.g. due to mobility ) . the new neighbors may cause too much interference in a too short time , so the edge changes should be limited . we assume the amount of edge changes is bounded for each node @xmath1 , as follows . consider a time interval @xmath96 of length @xmath97 . we require that the number of new neighbors of @xmath1 during @xmath96 ( not counting churn ) is bounded by @xmath98 , where @xmath99 denotes the number of rounds in @xmath96 and @xmath100 is a constant , to be fixed later . we further assume the fraction of rounds in @xmath96 when there are more than @xmath101 new neighbors of @xmath1 is bounded by @xmath102 for every @xmath103 , where @xmath104 . note that there is no restriction on distance changes inside the neighborhood of @xmath1 ( e.g. it is fine for node @xmath1 if its neighbors move , as far as they remain neighbors ) . note that the edge changes may affect the underlying metric , but we require that the upper bounds on metricity and independence are maintained . _ requirements and assumptions_. for the convenience of the reader , we gather together all of our assumptions and requirements in a single place . communication is assumed to succeed in a clear channel ( ) . we assume constant metricity @xmath105 and that @xmath30 has @xmath42-bounded independence with @xmath106 . for the local broadcast problem , we assume that @xmath107 , and for the broadcast problem that @xmath108 . as is standard in fading models , the communication radius @xmath109 is necessarily an @xmath110-fraction of the maximum transmission distance in a clear channel . besides the knowledge required by the primitives that are needed for a particular algorithm , the nodes are assumed to know the precision parameter @xmath55 . a polynomial estimate on the number of nodes , @xmath16 , is needed in dynamic and non - spontaneous algorithms , but not in the static spontaneous problems . knowledge of approximations of model parameters are needed to implement primitives , including @xmath111 , @xmath105 , @xmath53 , @xmath112 , and @xmath68 . knowledge of the maximum degree @xmath3 is not needed . synchronous operation is only assumed in the broadcast algorithm . aspects not defined or constrained are assumed to be under ( adaptive ) adversarial control , including when transmissions that fail are successful , or when nodes appear or disappear from the network . the extent of increases in edge strengths over a period is restricted , as detailed above , while decreases are not and neither are node changes . the dissemination problems are only expected to function with the set of nodes that are sufficiently stable , as detailed in the respective section . in order to keep the contention in the network balanced , we propose a basic procedure called try&adjust , which will be the main building block in our algorithms . the idea is to let each node adapt its transmission probability to the contention detected using the assumed primitive . the parameter @xmath113 describes the passiveness of the newly arriving nodes . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ try&adjust(@xmath114 ) : each node @xmath1 maintains transmission probability @xmath115 in each round @xmath56 , initialized as @xmath116 when @xmath1 enters the network . in round @xmath117 , @xmath1 does : + 1 . transmit with probability @xmath71 , and + 2 . set @xmath118 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ the aim for controlling contention is , of course , to ensure that transmissions made have a fair chance of being successful , which means they sufficiently overpower the interference experienced at intended receiver from all other transmissions made in that round . we account for this interference in two ways : the _ contention _ captures the expected interference from the nodes neighbors , while the _ interference _ integrates also the interference from nodes further away . we will measure the contention in the _ vicinity _ of each node @xmath1 , i.e. in @xmath119 , where @xmath76 is a large enough constant . we specify a threshold @xmath120 ( recall @xmath121 from definition ) for measuring contention : if @xmath122 then round @xmath56 is a _ high contention round _ for node @xmath1 and is a _ low contention round _ , otherwise . we further specify a threshold @xmath123 for interference : if @xmath124 then round @xmath56 is a _ high interference round _ for @xmath1 and is _ low interference round _ , otherwise . these thresholds are chosen so as to ensure that in a low - contention / interference round , node @xmath1 will be likely to succeed if it transmits . however , requiring all or most rounds to be low contention for all nodes will lead to high delays instead , it turns out that most rounds will have _ bounded contention _ and low interference , which allows for good progress ; we say node @xmath1 experiences _ bounded contention _ in round @xmath56 if @xmath125 , where @xmath126 is a large enough constant , to be specified later . we say that a round @xmath56 is _ good _ for node @xmath1 if @xmath56 is both bounded contention and low interference round ( in which case , some node in @xmath1 s vicinity has a good chance of successfully transmitting ) . we analyze the properties of try&adjust using the notion of _ a phase _ , the shortest time in which at least @xmath127 rounds occur for all nodes , where @xmath128 is sufficiently large ( given in prop . [ pr : pgoodroundl ] ) . we use @xmath129 to denote a general phase and also the set of rounds in that phase . @xmath130 denotes the number of rounds in a phase @xmath129 ( i.e. @xmath131 ) . the fundamental property of try&adjust ( prop . [ pr : pgoodroundl ] ) is that , for each node and each phase , most of the rounds in the phase are good for that node . this property is then used to show that : if most of the good rounds in a phase have low contention , then node @xmath1 detects idle channel in most of those rounds . otherwise , during a constant fraction of the rounds , a node in the vicinity of @xmath1 mass - delivers . by choosing the parameters carefully , i.e. requiring _ low enough _ contention , we can make sure that during a phase with mostly low contention , the node detects idle channel in _ most of the rounds _ ( more than half ) in a phase , thus leading to an increase of transmission probability by the end of the phase , which , after sufficiently many phases ensures message delivery , w.h.p . on the other hand , during a phase with mostly high contention , there will be many nodes in the vicinity of @xmath1 that successfully transmit , leading to lower contention . these ideas are applied in thms . [ thm : localbroadcast ] and [ thm : broadcast ] . the core idea behind this analysis is based on @xcite . [ pr : pgoodroundl ] let @xmath132 . if constants @xmath133 and @xmath134 are large enough then for each node @xmath1 and phase @xmath129 , with probability @xmath135 , a @xmath136-fraction of the rounds in @xmath129 are good . the proof is rather technical and is deferred to sec . [ sec : contentiondetails ] but the intuition is as follows . the contention in each neighborhood must be bounded most of the time , because when it becomes large , it has a high chance of being decreased due to busy channel . moreover , we show that in expectation , the contention in _ all _ local neighborhoods is bounded , which is then combined with a geometric argument to show that the expected interference at each node is low most of the time . we derive from the fundamental property two useful propositions . the first says that if contention is high , then nodes in the vicinity deliver the message . [ pr : pdecrease ] assume that constants @xmath137 are large enough . for each node @xmath1 and phase @xmath129 , if at least @xmath138-fraction of the rounds of @xmath129 are of high contention , then @xmath139 nodes in @xmath140 mass - deliver , with probability @xmath135 . to this end , we first show that if a round is good for node @xmath20 and a node in its vicinity transmits , then it mass - delivers with constant probability , utilizing both metric assumptions and the properties of good rounds . we then argue that since most rounds are good ( by prop . [ pr : pgoodroundl ] ) and most rounds have by assumption sufficient contention , many rounds will be both good and with sufficient contention , and in each of those , a node in the vicinity of @xmath1 is likely to transmit and succeed . when contention is low in a lot of rounds of a phase , the node will detect idle channel by the primitive in many rounds . this will actually happen during many good rounds , which have the low local contention and low external interference to allow for this detection . [ pr : idle ] assume that @xmath137 are large enough . for each node @xmath1 and phase @xmath129 , if at least @xmath141-fraction of the rounds of @xmath129 are low contention rounds , then with probability @xmath135 , in at least @xmath142-fraction of the rounds of @xmath129 , @xmath1 will detect idle channel and have low contention and low interference . we propose an algorithm for asynchronous local broadcast in dynamic networks . the algorithm is an extension of the try&adjust procedure , where the nodes try to balance the contention in the network and stop transmitting as soon as they deliver their message . we assume the nodes are powered with and primitives . note that the passiveness parameter is set to @xmath143 , which means that the transmission probability of nodes does not get below @xmath144 . localbcast : each node @xmath1 executes try&adjust(1 ) with the following additional step : if @xmath1 transmits and detects , it stops ( i.e. @xmath145 for @xmath146 ) . we will estimate the performance of the algorithm using the notion of _ dynamic degree _ , defined as follows . given a parameter @xmath147 , we denote @xmath148 for node @xmath1 and rounds @xmath149 with @xmath150 , where @xmath151 denotes the in - ball @xmath119 in round @xmath33 . below we prove that if there are not too many node insertions in the neighborhood of a node @xmath1 , then @xmath1 mass - delivers ( delivers to all its neighbors ) in time comparable to its dynamic degree with @xmath76 a constant . the main tools for proving the bound are props . [ pr : pdecrease ] and [ pr : idle ] . first we argue that if there is a phase of mostly low contention , then node @xmath1 will deliver its message , w.h.p . then we show that if the insertions are not too intensive then the contention around @xmath1 will decrease and a phase with mostly low contention will happen . [ thm : localbroadcast ] there is a constant @xmath147 , such that a node @xmath1 performing localbcast asynchronously in a time interval @xmath152 $ ] with @xmath153 mass - delivers , w.h.p . , provided that @xmath154 . note that the assumption @xmath154 is needed only for making the claim w.h.p . : it can be relaxed to higher degree polynomials by only increasing constant factors . let us fix constants @xmath155 so that props . [ pr : pdecrease ] and [ pr : idle ] with @xmath156 . we partition @xmath96 into phases ( for node @xmath1 ) and classify them into two types : ( type a ) phases @xmath129 where at least @xmath138-fraction of rounds are high contention rounds ( i.e. @xmath157 ) , and ( type b ) phases @xmath129 where at least @xmath141-fraction of rounds are low contention rounds ( i.e. @xmath158 ) . node @xmath1 mass - delivers in a type b phase , w.h.p . let @xmath159 be the low contention and interference rounds during phase @xmath129 where @xmath1 detects idle channel . by prop . [ pr : idle ] @xmath160 > 1-o(n^{-3})$ ] . assume for now that the latter happens . for each @xmath161 we have @xmath162 . let us call this operation doubling . the value of @xmath71 at the beginning of the phase is at least @xmath144 , so @xmath163 doubling operations are sufficient to raise it to @xmath164 . the probability can be further halved during the phase at most @xmath165 times . thus , we may assume we have at most @xmath166 halving and at least @xmath167 doubling operations applied to an initial value @xmath164 . if @xmath168 , then the total number of halving operations is less than @xmath169 . it follows that @xmath1 has @xmath170 in at least @xmath171 low contention / interference rounds . by lemma [ le : broadgood ] , in each such round , @xmath1 mass - delivers with probability at least @xmath172 ; hence , if @xmath128 is large enough , @xmath1 mass - delivers in @xmath129 , w.h.p . it remains to argue that there will be a type b phase during time interval @xmath96 . consider a type a phase @xmath129 . [ pr : pdecrease ] implies that with probability @xmath135 , @xmath173 nodes in @xmath119 deliver their message and stop during phase @xmath129 . thus , with probability @xmath174 , there are at most @xmath175 type a phases with @xmath176 a constant , as there are at most @xmath177 nodes in @xmath140 during the time interval @xmath96 ( also recall that @xmath178 ) . we conclude that if @xmath96 consists of at least @xmath179 phases , it will contain a type b phase and @xmath1 will deliver its message w.h.p . * implications for static networks*. in static networks , the parameter @xmath177 is at most @xmath180 if @xmath76 is constant , where @xmath181 is the maximum size of a neighborhood in the network . thus , we obtain the following optimal result ( up to constant factors ) for static networks , as @xmath3 and @xmath163 are lower bounds even when running in the spontaneous mode @xcite . when running localbcast in a static asynchronous network , each node @xmath1 completes local broadcast in @xmath182 rounds , w.h.p . * remark . * in the special case when the nodes can start executing the algorithm simultaneously , i.e. in the _ spontaneous mode _ , the nodes need not know an upper bound on the size of the network . indeed , each node may start running try&adjust with initial probability set to an arbitrary value and with no lower limit . the first phase will be spent for stabilization and can be ignored , while the argument for the rest of the phases is nearly identical to the one in thm . [ thm : localbroadcast ] . for the broadcast problem , we assume nodes communicate in synchronized rounds of equal length . each round consists of two slots . the idea is to use the first slot of each round for disseminating the message with try&adjust and the second slot for notifying nodes which have no uninformed neighbors . the latter is accomplished by using higher precision primitives , namely ( @xmath183 ) and ( @xmath183 ) , when executing try&adjust . this helps to detect a transmission that is successfully received by all nodes in @xmath184 of a node @xmath1 . upon detecting such a transmission , node @xmath1 resends the message in the second slot , in order to inform nodes @xmath20 with @xmath185 that their neighborhood ( @xmath186 ) has been covered . a node @xmath20 can detect that @xmath185 using . the algorithm is presented below . we assume the passiveness parameter @xmath114 of try&adjust is large enough , to be defined later . note that the algorithm works for the non - spontaneous mode , as nodes act only after receiving the message . bcast(@xmath114 ) : initially , only a source node @xmath187 has the message . a node @xmath1 , upon receiving a message , starts executing try&adjust(@xmath114 ) in the first slot of rounds . in addition , in each round @xmath56 , + 1 . if @xmath1 detects in the first slot , it retransmits in the second slot and restarts try&adjust(@xmath114 ) , + 2 . if @xmath1 receives a message in the first slot and detects in the second slot , it restarts try&adjust(@xmath114 ) . in order to evaluate the progress of the algorithm , we use a notion of a _ dynamic distance _ , as defined below . let @xmath188 be a parameter . a sequence @xmath189 is called a _ stable @xmath187-@xmath1 path _ if there is a sequence @xmath190 of time intervals with @xmath191 $ ] , such that @xmath192 , @xmath193 and nodes @xmath194 and @xmath195 are both alive and @xmath196 during @xmath197 . the _ time - length _ of a stable @xmath187-@xmath1 path is @xmath198 . the _ stable @xmath187-@xmath1 distance _ @xmath199 is defined as the minimum time - length of a stable @xmath187-@xmath1 path . note that a stable path need not be connected at any fixed point in time . moreover , most of the nodes might be missing at any given point in time . the core idea behind the analysis of the following theorem is similar to the case of local broadcast : we show that as soon as a neighbor @xmath20 of a node @xmath1 has the message and @xmath20 and @xmath1 keep being neighbors for @xmath200 rounds , @xmath1 will receive a transmission of @xmath20 during those rounds . [ thm : broadcast ] assume the edge change rate @xmath100 is sufficiently small . there are constants @xmath201 , such that when running bcast(@xmath114 ) in the synchronous mode , each node @xmath1 receives the message in @xmath202 rounds w.h.p . let us fix constants @xmath155 so that props . [ pr : pdecrease ] and [ pr : idle ] hold with interference threshold @xmath203 , where @xmath204 and @xmath205 are the parameters corresponding to precision @xmath183 . we set the passiveness parameter of try&adjust to @xmath206 and the stable distance parameter @xmath207 . consider a node @xmath20 that receives the message in round @xmath56 . let @xmath1 be such that @xmath208 in the time interval @xmath209 $ ] ( and both stay alive during @xmath96 ) . the theorem follows by an induction and union bound from the claim below . node @xmath1 gets the message of @xmath20 during @xmath96 , with probability @xmath210 . we prove the claim by contradiction , and assume that @xmath1 can not get the message during @xmath96 . let us split @xmath96 into phases ( for @xmath20 ) and , similar to the proof of thm . [ thm : localbroadcast ] , classify the phases @xmath129 into types : ( type a ) at least @xmath138-th of rounds in @xmath129 are high contention rounds for @xmath20 @xmath211 , and ( type b ) at least @xmath141-th of rounds in @xmath129 are low contention rounds for @xmath20 @xmath212 . we show that with probability @xmath135 , all phases in @xmath96 are of type b. consider a type a phase @xmath129 . we know from prop . [ pr : pdecrease ] that , with probability @xmath135 , there is a set @xmath39 of @xmath139 nodes in @xmath140 that deliver their messages and restart try&adjust during @xmath129 . we split @xmath39 into three subsets , @xmath213 those inserted by churn during @xmath129 , @xmath214 those inserted by edge change during @xmath129 and @xmath215 the rest . consider @xmath214 first . we know that in each local neighborhood , there are at most @xmath216 nodes arriving due to edge changes . note that @xmath217 can be covered with @xmath218 local neighborhoods ; hence , the total number of nodes arriving in @xmath217 due to edge changes is @xmath219 . since @xmath220 , setting @xmath221 a small enough constant gives @xmath222 . now consider @xmath215 . by the primitive , for each node @xmath223 , all nodes in @xmath224 also restart try&adjust , setting their transmission probability to @xmath225 . by the setting of @xmath226 , the probability that a node restarting try&adjust in phase @xmath129 transmits again in @xmath129 is at most @xmath227 . thus , with probability at least @xmath135 , the nodes in @xmath214 constitute an @xmath228-packing of @xmath140 and are at most @xmath229 . as for @xmath213 , the probability that a newly arriving node transmits during phase @xmath129 is at most @xmath227 , so @xmath230 w.h.p . these bounds lead to a contradiction @xmath231 , if constant @xmath128 is large enough . thus , each phase @xmath129 of @xmath96 is of type b with probability @xmath135 . it remains to recall that @xmath96 contains constant number of phases . now assume that @xmath129 is of type b. in a similar way as in theorem [ thm : localbroadcast ] , we can apply prop . [ pr : idle ] and show that if @xmath232 at the beginning of @xmath129 , then by the end of @xmath129 , the effect on @xmath71 is equivalent to applying at least @xmath233 of @xmath234 operations on @xmath235 . since @xmath236 at the beginning of @xmath96 is at least @xmath225 , it will take at most 11 phases to increase the probability to the value @xmath164 . then , a single phase will suffice for @xmath20 to deliver its message ( including to node @xmath1 ) , with probability at least @xmath210 . * implications for static networks*. when the network is static , theorem [ thm : broadcast ] can be reformulated in terms of hop - distance @xmath237 in the communication graph , which is defined as the length of the shortest directed @xmath187-@xmath1 path in @xmath238 : we have that @xmath239 for any node @xmath1 . note also that in this setting nodes that succeeded transmitting or detected need not continue the algorithm , so they stop transmitting . in this case , setting the passiveness parameter to @xmath143 suffices . we call this variant of the algorithm bcast@xmath240 . when running bcast@xmath240 in synchronous non - spontaneous mode in a static network with source @xmath187 , each node @xmath1 receives the message in @xmath241 rounds w.h.p . when the communication graph is strongly connected , the broadcast from any source node is completed in @xmath242 rounds , where @xmath243 is the diameter of the communication graph . in the spontaneous mode , the bound above can be further improved to @xmath244 ; see appendix [ sec : spontaneous ] . this is based on finding a constant - density dominating set in @xmath200 time @xcite and simultaneously propagating along the dominators in @xmath244 time . we can therefore extend the approach based on @xcite to uniform algorithms in bounded - independence metrics . these results are close to best possible . we show below that in order to obtain bounds of that magnitude , it is necessary to have the primitive . to this end , we extend the lower bound construction of ( * ? ? ? * thm . 7 ) for `` compact sinr '' to our setting . this construction leverages the property of our model that there can be arbitrarily many nodes that are mutually close to each other . namely , the bounded - independence metric is strictly more relaxed than the standard euclidean metrics . indeed , there is a @xmath245-round broadcast algorithm for the sinr model that does not need or other carrier sensing primitives @xcite . what the lower bound then illustrates is that to obtain such results , one must depend on opportune traits of the sinr model that we have tried to avoid and are not necessary for problems like local broadcast . thus we can observe concrete tradeoffs depending on model assumptions . [ thm : brlowerbound ] for every ( possibly randomized ) broadcast algorithm @xmath246 that uses neither node coordinates nor primitive , there is a @xmath247-bounded - independence metric space where @xmath246 needs @xmath248 rounds to do broadcast in a @xmath249-broadcastable network , even if the nodes have and primitives and operate spontaneously . 10 n. alon , a. bar - noy , n. linial , and d. peleg . . in _ stoc _ , pages 274285 , 1989 . n. alon , a. bar - noy , n. linial , and d. peleg . a lower bound for radio broadcast . , 43(2):290298 , 1991 . r. bar - yehuda , o. goldreich , and a. itai . on the time - complexity of broadcast in radio networks : an exponential gap between determinism and randomization . in _ podc87 _ , 1987 . l. barenboim and d. peleg . nearly optimal local broadcasting in the sinr model with feedback . in _ sirocco _ , pages 164178 , 2015 . m. h. bodlaender and m. m. halldrsson . beyond geometry : towards fully realistic wireless models . in _ podc _ , pages 347356 , 2014 . m. h. bodlaender , m. m. halldrsson , and p. mitra . . in _ podc _ , pages 355364 . acm , 2013 . i. chlamtac and s. kutten . on broadcasting in radio networks problem analysis and protocol design . , 33(12):12401246 , 1985 . b. s. chlebus , d. r. kowalski , and s. vaya . distributed communication in bare - bones wireless networks . , 2015 . b. n. clark , c. j. colbourn , and d. s. johnson . unit disk graphs . , 86(1):165177 , 1990 . a. e. clementi , a. monti , and r. silvestri . round robin is optimal for fault - tolerant broadcasting on wireless networks . , 64(1):8996 , 2004 . a. czumaj and w. rytter . broadcasting algorithms in radio networks with unknown topology . in _ focs03 _ , 2003 . s. daum , s. gilbert , f. kuhn , and c. newport . . in _ disc _ , pages 358372 , 2013 . b. derbel and e. talbi . . in _ icdcn10 _ , pages 155166 , 2010 . s. dolev , s. gilbert , m. khabbazian , and c. newport . . in _ disc _ , pages 252267 , 2011 . a. fanghnel , t. kesselheim , and b. vcking . . , 412(24):26572667 , 2011 . m. ghaffari , s. gilbert , c. newport , and h. tan . optimal broadcast in shared spectrum radio networks . in _ opodis12 _ , 2012 . m. ghaffari , b. haeupler , and m. khabbazian . randomized broadcast in radio networks with collision detection . in _ podc13 _ , 2013 . m. ghaffari , b. haeupler , n. lynch , and c. newport . bounds on contention management in radio networks . in _ disc _ , 2012 . m. ghaffari , e. kantor , n. lynch , and c. newport . multi - message broadcast with abstract mac layers and unreliable links . in _ podc14 _ , 2014 . m. ghaffari , n. lynch , and c. newport . the cost of radio network broadcast for different models of unreliable links . in podc13 _ , 2013 . o. goussevskaia , t. moscibroda , and r. wattenhofer . . in _ dialm - pomc 08 _ , pages 3544 , 2008 . p. gupta and p. kumar . , 46(2):388404 , 2000 . m. m. halldrsson . . , 9(1):7:17:20 , dec . m. m. halldrsson , s. holzer , and n. a. lynch . a local broadcast layer for the sinr network model . in _ podc _ , pages 129138 , 2015 . m. m. halldrsson , s. holzer , p. mitra , and r. wattenhofer . . in _ soda13 _ , pages 15951606 , 2013 . m. m. halldrsson and p. mitra . . in _ icalp _ , pages 625636 , 2011 . m. m. halldrsson and p. mitra . . in _ podc _ , 2012 . m. m. halldrsson and p. mitra . . fomc _ , 2012 . m. m. halldrsson , y. wang , and d. yu . leveraging multiple channels in ad hoc networks . in _ podc15 _ , 2015 . m. hoefer , t. kesselheim , and b. vcking . approximation algorithms for secondary spectrum auctions . in _ proceedings of the twenty - third annual acm symposium on parallelism in algorithms and architectures _ , spaa 11 , pages 177186 , new york , ny , usa , 2011 . r. impagliazzo and v. kabanets . constructive proofs of concentration bounds . in _ approx - random _ , pages 617631 , 2010 . t. jurdzinski , d. kowalski , m. rozanski , and g. stachowiak . distributed randomized broadcasting in wireless networks under the sinr model . in _ disc _ , pages 373387 , 2013 . t. jurdzinski , d. kowalski , m. rozanski , and g. stachowiak . on the impact of geometry on ad hoc communication in wireless networks . in _ podc 14 _ , 2014 . t. jurdzinski , d. r. kowalski , and g. stachowiak . . in _ fct13 _ , pages 195209 , 2013 . t. jurdzinski , d. r. kowalski , and g. stachowiak . distributed deterministic broadcasting in wireless networks of weak devices . in _ icalp13 _ , 2013 . t. kesselheim and b. vcking . . in _ disc _ , pages 163178 , 2010 . d. kowalski and a. pelc . broadcasting in undirected ad hoc radio networks . in _ podc03 _ , 2003 . f. kuhn , n. lynch , and c. newport . brief announcement : hardness of broadcasting in wireless networks with unreliable communication . in _ disc _ , 2009 . f. kuhn , n. lynch , c. newport , r. oshman , and a. richa . . in _ podc _ , pages 336345 . acm , 2010 . f. kuhn , t. moscibroda , and r. wattenhofer . . in _ mobicom _ , pages 260274 . acm , 2004 . f. kuhn and r. oshman . dynamic networks : models and algorithms . , 42(1):8296 , 2011 . f. kuhn , r. wattenhofer , and a. zollinger . ad hoc networks beyond unit disk graphs . , 14:715729 , 2008 . e. kushilevitz and y. mansour . . , 27(3):702712 , 1998 . c. lenzen and r. wattenhofer . distributed algorithms for sensor networks . , 370(1958 ) , 2012 . t. moscibroda and r. wattenhofer . . , 21(4):271284 , 2008 . c. newport radio network lower bounds made easy . in _ disc14 _ , 2014 . c. scheideler , a. richa , and p. santi . . in _ mobihoc 08 _ , pages 91100 , 2008 . s. schmid and r. wattenhofer . algorithmic models for sensor networks . in _ wpdrts06 _ , 2006 . j. schneider and r. wattenhofer . . in _ podc _ , pages 210219 , 2009 . j. schneider and r. wattenhofer . in _ disc _ , pages 133147 . springer - verlag , 2010 . d. yu , q .- s . hua , y. wang , and f. lau . . dcoss 12 _ , pages 132139 , 2012 . d. yu , q .- s . hua , y. wang , h. tan , and f. lau . . in _ sirocco12 _ , pages 111122 , 2012 . d. yu , q .- s . hua , y. wang , j. yu , and f. lau . . in _ infocom13 _ , pages 24272435 , 2013 . d. yu , y. wang , q .- s . hua , and f. c. m. lau . . in _ distributed computing in sensor systems and workshops ( dcoss ) , 2011 international conference on _ , pages 18 , 2011 . d. yu , y. wang , y. yan , j. yu , and f. lau . speedup of information exchange using multiple channels in wireless ad hoc networks . in _ infocom15 _ , 2015 . _ wireless models : _ considering wireless interference , there are two classes of wireless network models : graph - based and physical models . basically , the graph - based models define a local and binary type of interference , while the physical models consider fading effect of signal on wireless channels . the most classical graph - based model is the radio network model @xcite . in this model , the network is modeled using a communication graph , where each pair of nodes that can communicate with each other is connected by an edge . it defines the interference just from direct neighbors , and a transmission can succeed if and only if there is only one neighbor of the receiver transmitting . there are many widely used variants of the classical radio network models , including : 1 ) the @xmath0-hop model where the interference comes from @xmath0-hop neighbors @xcite ; 2 ) unit disc graph ( udg ) model @xcite which defines the neighborhood using a unit disc ; 3 ) quasi unit disc graph ( qudg ) model @xcite which just defines all pairs of nodes with distance at most @xmath76 for some given @xmath250 $ ] are adjacent , and leave the ` grey ' area in @xmath251 $ ] being determined by an adversary ; 4 ) protocol model @xcite , where each node has a transmission range and an interference range , and a successful transmission occurs if a node falls into the transmission range of a transmitter and outside the interference ranges of all other transmitter ; 5 ) bounded - independence graph ( big ) model @xcite , which defines abstractly and requires that the size of the maximal independent set in the @xmath33-hop neighborhood of each node is bounded by a polynomial function with @xmath33 . though the graph - based interference models miss certain crucial aspects of actual wireless networks , the simple definition of these models can help derive novel insights into distributed solutions to wireless problems . physical models , also known as sinr models @xcite , capture the fading and cumulative features of receptions in actual wireless environments . the default assumption is that interference fades with a polynomial of the distance , and transmission succeeds only if the received signal strength is sufficiently larger than the total interference plus noise . recently , the sinr model has attracted great attentions in the distributed community @xcite . most of these works focus on networks embedded in euclidean space , while many of the results hold also for doubling or `` bounded growth '' metrics @xcite . those doubling metrics constrain growth at every ( or arbitrarily small ) granularity , while ours only bounds regions proportional to the transmission range , in particular capturing bounded independence graphs ( big ) . for more on wireless models , please refer to @xcite . _ local broadcast _ : in the radio network model , probably the first local broadcast result was a randomized algorithm of alon et al . @xcite in a synchronous model , running in @xmath6 rounds . derbel and talbi @xcite later generalized their algorithm to work without knowledge of @xmath3 and their proposed algorithm can accomplish local broadcast in @xmath7 rounds . the decay strategy also yields an @xmath6 time algorithm for local broadcast without knowledge of @xmath3 @xcite . goussevskaia et al . @xcite gave the first results for local broadcast in the sinr model , running in time @xmath6 and @xmath252 with and without knowledge of @xmath3 , respectively . the latter was improved in @xcite and further improved , independently , to @xmath7 time @xcite . with free acknowledgements , this was improved to @xmath253 @xcite . when additionally @xmath3 is known , this was further improved recently to @xmath8 in the spontaneous setting @xcite . the speedup of multiple channels on local broadcast was considered in @xcite _ broadcast _ : the complexity of broadcasting is well understood in graph - based models . in the radio network model , bar - yehuda et al . @xcite presented the decay protocol which can accomplish non - spontaneous broadcast in @xmath254 rounds , where @xmath46 is the diameter . this result was improved to @xmath9 independently by czumaj and rytter @xcite , and kowalski and pelc @xcite . these algorithms can be viewed as clever optimizations of the decay protocol and match the lower bound @xcite . with collision detection , this lower bound was recently broken in @xcite , where a solution of @xmath10 was given . broadcast in multi - channel radio networks was considered in @xcite . for the udg model , an @xmath255 time algorithm was given in @xcite in the spontaneous setting . broadcasting has been treated in the sinr model under a variety of assumptions . some are stronger than ours ( location information @xcite , power control @xcite ) . some relax the assumption about the connectivity property , but incur necessarily super - linear complexity @xcite . results in our setting , but without carrier sensing , include time complexity of @xmath256 @xcite ( see also @xcite ) , where @xmath12 denotes the maximum ratio between distances of stations connected in the communication graph ; and @xmath13 @xcite . in the spontaneous setting , where the nodes can build an overlay structure along which the message is then propagated , scheideler et al . @xcite solved the problem in @xmath257 rounds using physical carrier sensing . yu et al . @xcite solved the problem in @xmath258 rounds using power control , allowing stations to decide the strength of a transmitted signal in each step . and the algorithm in @xcite then runs in time @xmath254 . _ distributed models of temporal variability _ : dynamic networks have been studied extensively in recent years ( see @xcite for a survey ) , but generally not in the presence of interference . the _ dual graph _ model @xcite ( originally due to @xcite ) was designed to capture inherent _ unreliability _ in wireless networks , much of which can be due to dynamicity . the main focus of that work is on extending the radio network model in general graphs . importantly , the dual graph model does not distinguish between interference and communication edges ; only that the unreliable edges can transmit both interference and the usual communication , but their availability is under adversarial control . thus , there is no way to capture interference from further away nodes . most problems become extremely difficult against a powerful adversary , and to get good result , one must assume a much weaker one @xcite . this model only involves edge behavior and not node changes ( churn ) . both the local broadcast @xcite and global broadcast @xcite problems are studied in the dual graph model . a dynamic model that considers node insertion is the _ unstructured _ model @xcite , which admits arbitrary wake - up mode and asynchronous communication . this model was first proposed in the unit - disc setting , and then extended to bounded independence graphs ( big ) @xcite and sinr @xcite . it has been widely used in the solution of a variety of distributed wireless problems @xcite , including local broadcast @xcite , but there are no known global broadcast results . the model neither consider node deletion nor edge changes . hence , the impact of dynamicity on global communication is largely unexplored . [ [ modeling - communication ] ] modeling communication + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + our communication model captures most known algorithmic wireless models , as it is demonstrated below on the example of sinr , disk - graph based and protocol models . note that we assume below the distance @xmath259 to be symmetric , but the results hold also for `` almost symmetric '' functions , i.e. when there is a constant @xmath260 such that @xmath261 for all @xmath262 . _ sinr model . _ consider a network in a metric space . in the sinr model of communication , if @xmath39 is the set of simultaneously transmitting nodes in the network , a node @xmath1 receives the transmission of node @xmath20 if and only if @xmath263 where constants @xmath113 and @xmath264 denote the minimum sinr threshold and the ambient noise , respectively . note that @xmath265 in this setting . we can implement with parameters @xmath266 and @xmath267 , as shown in the proposition below . [ pr : scc ] if the interference at a node @xmath1 is less than @xmath68 in round @xmath56 , then @xmath1 will deliver its message if it transmits . note that if the interference at node @xmath1 is not more than @xmath68 then there is no node @xmath268 transmitting in round @xmath56 , as otherwise the interference at @xmath1 would be at least @xmath269 ; hence , only nodes in @xmath270 can transmit . consider an arbitrary node @xmath271 . for each node @xmath272 , @xmath273 . then , the interference at @xmath274 is at most : @xmath275 which implies that node @xmath274 receives @xmath1 s transmission : @xmath276 . _ the udg and ubg models . _ these models are described by geometric graphs : a node @xmath20 receives a message from another node @xmath1 if and only if @xmath1 is the only transmitting neighbor of @xmath20 . in the unit disk graph ( udg ) and unit ball graph ( ubg ) models the nodes are located in a metric space and two nodes are connected by an edge if and only if their distance is at most @xmath277 . the functionality of can be modeled as follows : the transmission of a node @xmath1 is received by all its neighbors if there is no other node at distance less than @xmath278 from @xmath1 transmitting simultaneously , i.e. we can set the parameters to @xmath279 and @xmath280 . _ the quasi - udg model . _ the quasi - udg model is an extension of the udg model : a ) if @xmath281 then @xmath20 and @xmath1 are connected by an edge , b ) if @xmath282 then they are disconnected , c ) otherwise , @xmath20 and @xmath1 may be connected or not . in this case may be implemented by setting @xmath279 and @xmath283 , with the adversary constrained to follow the specific static situation captured by the qudg . _ the protocol model . _ in the protocol model , the nodes are in a metric space and there are two radii : @xmath277 the communication radius , and @xmath284 the interference radius . a node @xmath1 receives the transmission of a node @xmath20 if and only if : 1 ) @xmath1 is in the communication range of node @xmath20 , i.e. @xmath281 , and 2 ) there is no transmitting node @xmath274 such that @xmath1 is in the interference range of @xmath274 : for each transmitting node @xmath285 , @xmath286 . may be implemented here by setting @xmath279 and @xmath283 . _ the big model . _ in the bounded independence graph ( big ) model , for a parameter @xmath287 , we are given a graph on the nodes with the property that for every node @xmath1 and every @xmath288 , the maximum independent set in the @xmath0-neighborhood of @xmath1 is @xmath289 . the shortest - path distance metric on the graph is now naturally a @xmath290-bounded independence metric . to fit in our model , the growth parameter @xmath287 must be less than @xmath105 . _ @xmath0-hop variants . _ these graph models can be naturally generalized to a model on interference , where nodes of distance at most @xmath0 cause interference , for some @xmath291 . we capture this by extending @xmath112 as needed . [ [ implementing - primitives - with - physical - carrier - sensing ] ] implementing primitives with physical carrier sensing + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + one way of implementing the primitives mentioned in this paper is to use physical carrier sensing , i.e. we assume the nodes have technology to detect if the interference ( plus noise ) is higher than a given threshold . we show below how to implement , and primitives using carrier sensing . * primitive . * the primitive can be implemented using a carrier sensing threshold @xmath292 and setting the parameter @xmath293 ; busy channel is detected if and only if the interference is at least @xmath96 . we will need the following technical fact . [ ieq ] for every @xmath294 $ ] , @xmath295 , it holds that @xmath296 if @xmath297 in round @xmath56 then all nodes in @xmath298 detect busy channel with probability at least @xmath299 . in particular , we can take @xmath300 if @xmath301 . by the setting of @xmath96 and the definition of @xmath74 , if two nodes in @xmath74 transmit in round @xmath56 , then all nodes in @xmath74 will detect busy channel . hence , the probability of all nodes in @xmath74 detecting busy channel is at least the probability of more than one node transmitting in round @xmath56 . the probability of no node transmitting is @xmath302 by lemma [ ieq ] . the probability of exactly one node transmitting is : @xmath303 where we used the assumption that @xmath304 and lemma [ ieq ] . thus , the probability of detecting busy channel is at least @xmath305 . for every @xmath147 , if @xmath306 and @xmath307 then @xmath1 detects idle channel with probability at least @xmath308 . by the setting of the threshold @xmath96 , if there is no node transmitting in @xmath119 then node @xmath1 will detect idle channel . thus , the probability that @xmath1 detects idle channel is at least @xmath309 using lemma [ ieq ] . * primitive . * in order to detect successful transmission , we can use interference threshold @xmath310 and set @xmath311 , where @xmath312 and @xmath313 are the parameters of . if a node @xmath1 senses that the interference is no higher than @xmath96 , it knows that : 1 . there is no node in @xmath314 transmitting , as otherwise the interference would be at least @xmath315 , 2 . the interference is at most @xmath68 ; thus , it knows that its transmission has been received by all neighbors in @xmath316 by . * primitive . * if a node @xmath1 receives a message from a node @xmath20 then @xmath1 can separate the signal from the interference and measure the received signal strength . as the nodes use uniform power assignment , node @xmath1 knows that @xmath95 if the received signal is stronger than @xmath317 . [ [ implementing - primitives - by - other - means ] ] implementing primitives by other means + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + the primitives can frequently be implemented in other ways , often with the logarithmic blowup that explains the differences with the best carrier - sense - free results . * * in an asynchronous system , it may be impossible to implement by other means than carrier sense . in a synchronized system , however , we can be achieved with logarithmic or polylogarithmic factor overhead . consider a given round . for each probability @xmath318 , repeat @xmath319 times : the senders in the original round transmit with probability @xmath320 . using concentration bound with @xmath50 sufficiently large , one can infer the contention within an small approximation , with high probability . such a strategy has been applied , e.g. , in @xcite . * primitive . * a simple strategy is to work with only probabilistic guarantees of a transmission being received by all neighbors . then , simply repeat the protocol until this has been achieved @xmath319 times , which gives an guarantee , w.h.p . this approach underlies , e.g. , the local broadcast algorithms without carrier sense @xcite . * primitive . * this primitive , which is essential for dominator - based strategies for broadcast , can be implemented using power control : by lowering the power on all units appropriately , one can ensure that nodes further away ( by a small constant factor ) will not be able to hear the message due to the ambient noise term , see e.g. @xcite . alternatively , one can assume that distances can be determined in other ways , such as by gps @xcite . recall that we need to prove the following . we assume that at the beginning of the _ first _ phase under consideration , the contention in the whole network is bounded by a constant . this holds for all algorithms in this paper , as the initial probability of nodes is always at most @xmath321 . * * proposition [ pr : pgoodroundl ] . * * let @xmath132 . if constants @xmath133 and @xmath134 are large enough then for each node @xmath1 and phase @xmath129 , with probability @xmath135 , a @xmath136-fraction of the rounds in @xmath129 are good . recall that in a good round , there should be both bounded contention and low interference . the proof is split into two parts , each handling one of these properties . [ pr : pgoodroundl ] follows by simply combining those two parts . we will need the following concentration bounds . @xcite[le : chernoff ] consider a collection of binary random variables @xmath322 , and let @xmath323 . if there are probabilities @xmath324 with @xmath325\leq \prod_{i\in s}p_i$ ] for every set @xmath326 , then it holds for @xmath327 and @xmath328 that @xmath329\leq\left(\frac{e^{\delta}}{(1+\delta)^{1+\delta}}\right)^\mu\leq e^{-\frac{\delta^2\mu}{2(1+\delta/3)}}.\ ] ] if , on the other side , there are probabilities @xmath324 with @xmath325\geq \prod_{i\in s}p_i$ ] for every set @xmath326 , then it holds for @xmath327 and @xmath330 that @xmath331\leq\left(\frac{e^{-\delta}}{(1-\delta)^{1-\delta}}\right)^\mu\leq e^{-\delta^2\mu/2}.\ ] ] first , we show that for each fixed node @xmath20 , the contention in the _ local _ neighborhood @xmath332 is bounded in most of the rounds of a phase . to this end , we show that in each round , the contention is either already low or will be halved with significant probability , then apply a concentration bound to show the claim . recall the constant @xmath333 from the definition of . [ le : phi ] let @xmath129 be a time interval and assume that @xmath334 at the beginning of @xmath129 . then for every @xmath335 , @xmath336 happens at most @xmath337 times during @xmath129 , with probability @xmath338 , where @xmath339 and @xmath340 is the edge change parameter . by the assumptions on edge changes , we have that during phase @xmath129 , the fraction of rounds where more than @xmath341 nodes become a neighbor of @xmath20 because of edge changes is @xmath102 . let @xmath159 denote the remaining set of rounds . we have @xmath342 . in each of those rounds , the contribution of edge changes in @xmath343 is clearly at most @xmath344 . next we bound the number of rounds in @xmath159 , where @xmath345 . consider such a round @xmath161 . let @xmath346 . by the definition of , all nodes in @xmath332 detect busy channel in round @xmath56 and halve their transmission probabilities with probability at least @xmath347 . thus , @xmath348\ge 1-\mu'$ ] , where the additive @xmath164 accounts for the sum of probabilities of the nodes that just join the ball @xmath332 due to node churn ( recall that each of them has an initial probability at most @xmath349 ) and @xmath344 is an upper bound on the contention due to edge changes ( by the definition of @xmath159 ) . for each round @xmath161 , let us define a binary random variable @xmath350 as follows : @xmath351 if @xmath352 or @xmath353 and @xmath354 ( recall that @xmath355 ) and @xmath356 otherwise . by the discussion above , we have : @xmath357&=pr[p_{t}(u)\leq\phi]+pr[p_{t}(u)>\phi\wedge p_{t+1}(u)\leq\frac{5}{6}p_t(u)]\\ & = pr[p_{t}(u)\leq\phi]+pr[p_{t}(u)>\phi]\cdot pr[p_{t+1}(u)\leq\frac{5}{6}p_t(u)|p_{t}(u)>\phi]\\ & \geq pr[p_{t}(u)\leq\phi]+pr[p_{t}(u)>\phi]\cdot ( 1-\mu')\\ & \geq 1-\mu ' . \end{aligned}\ ] ] this implies that for each round @xmath358 and each subset @xmath359 of earlier rounds ( @xmath360 for @xmath361 ) , @xmath362\geq 1-\mu'$ ] and @xmath363\leq \mu'$ ] . thus , for each subset @xmath364 we get @xmath365\le \mu'^{|s| } , $ ] and if we denote @xmath366 , then @xmath367\le \mu ' |h'|=\mu |h|$ ] , where we denote @xmath368 . thus , we can apply chernoff bound ( lemma [ le : chernoff ] ) with @xmath369 to bound @xmath370 with high probability : @xmath371\le 2^{-\mu|h|}.\ ] ] using this bound , we obtain a bound on the number of rounds @xmath56 with @xmath372 . let @xmath373 denote this number . consider a maximal interval @xmath374\subseteq h'$ ] such that @xmath345 for all @xmath375 . for each round @xmath375 , @xmath376 if @xmath351 and @xmath377 otherwise . by maximality of @xmath378 , if @xmath379 _ is not _ the first round of phase @xmath129 , then we have @xmath380 . then a simple calculation shows that @xmath356 for at least @xmath381 part of the rounds of @xmath378 , i.e. @xmath382 . on the other hand , if there is a unique maximal interval @xmath378 starting at the first round of phase @xmath129 and such that @xmath383 , then it must hold that @xmath384 , where @xmath385 . combining these observations , we get that @xmath386 . by combining this bound with ( [ eq : xupperl ] ) , we have : @xmath387 \le pr[x\ge \delta\mu|h| ] < 2^{-\mu|h|}.\ ] ] thus , with probability @xmath388 , in at most @xmath389 fraction of rounds in @xmath129 there can be @xmath345 . recall that for node @xmath1 we need to show that @xmath390 for most rounds in a phase . we prove this by taking a _ constant size _ @xmath73-cover of @xmath119 and applying lemma [ le : phi ] to all nodes in the cover _ [ pr : lowc ] for every @xmath132 and @xmath147 , there are constants @xmath391 and @xmath392 , such that for every node @xmath1 and phase @xmath129 , with probability @xmath135 , at least @xmath136-fraction of rounds in @xmath129 are bounded contention rounds , i.e. @xmath393 . it will be sufficient to choose @xmath128 and @xmath394 such that @xmath395 and @xmath396 . by the definition of @xmath287 and bounded independence , there is a @xmath73-cover @xmath39 of @xmath119 of size @xmath397 . set @xmath398 . let us fix a node @xmath399 . if @xmath129 is the first phase or @xmath400 then we set @xmath401 . otherwise , consider the phase @xmath159 of @xmath127 rounds preceding @xmath129 . by lemma [ le : phi ] , if we set @xmath402 then , with probability @xmath403 , there is a round in @xmath159 where @xmath404 . let @xmath405 be such a round and set @xmath406 $ ] , where @xmath407 is the last round of @xmath129 . clearly , @xmath408 . now we can apply lemma [ le : phi ] for node @xmath20 with @xmath101 as above and conclude that with probability at least @xmath403 , there are at most @xmath409 rounds in @xmath378 ( note that @xmath410 ) where @xmath345 , so there are at most @xmath411 rounds in @xmath129 where @xmath345 . now we can apply the same argument for all nodes in @xmath412 simultaneously and conclude that with probability at least @xmath135 , there are at most @xmath413 rounds in @xmath129 where @xmath345 for _ every _ @xmath399 , if we take @xmath395 to be large enough . in the remaining @xmath414 rounds we have @xmath415 . we extract the following result from the proof of lemma [ le : phi ] , to use it later . the proof is similar to the proof of prop . [ pr : lowc ] . [ co : pexpectation ] for every @xmath335 and each node @xmath1 , the expected number of rounds in each phase @xmath129 where @xmath416 , is @xmath411 . let @xmath378 be the shortest time interval containing @xmath129 such that @xmath417 at the beginning of @xmath378 . let @xmath418 denote the event that @xmath408 . as in the proof of prop . [ pr : lowc ] , we have @xmath419 > 1-n^{-3}$ ] . let @xmath370 denote the number of rounds @xmath375 with @xmath80 . we know from the proof of lemma [ le : phi ] that @xmath420 = o(\phi^{-k})\cdot|\hat h| = o(\phi^{-k})\cdot |h|$ ] and @xmath367=e[x|\mathcal{e}]\cdot pr[\mathcal{e } ] + e[x|\bar{\mathcal{e}}]\cdot pr[\bar{\mathcal{e}}]= o(\phi^{-k})\cdot |h|$ ] . this completes the proof as @xmath421 . next we show that if @xmath76 is appropriately chosen then for each node @xmath1 , @xmath422 happens most of the time during each phase w.h.p . in order to show this , first we split the set of nodes in @xmath423 into local neighborhoods . we show that if in a given round the contention in each local neighborhood is bounded by an appropriate threshold , then the expected interference is small . for each local neighborhood , the expected number of rounds when the contention is higher than its threshold is bounded using corollary [ co : pexpectation ] . combining these results into one we get a bound on the expected number of rounds when @xmath424 is small . it then remains to apply a concentration bound to conclude the proof . [ pr : pinterferenceboundl ] for every @xmath132 and @xmath425 , there are constants @xmath426 and @xmath427 , such that for each node @xmath1 and phase @xmath129 , with probability @xmath135 , at least @xmath136-fraction of rounds in @xmath129 are low interference rounds , i.e. @xmath428 . let @xmath429 denote the in - ball of radius @xmath430 centered at node @xmath1 for @xmath431 . let @xmath432 be an @xmath73-cover of @xmath429 of size @xmath433 for a constant @xmath434 , which exists by bounded independence . let @xmath435 for @xmath436 , where @xmath437 is a large enough constant to be defined later . [ le : pexpectal ] if @xmath438 holds for all @xmath439 and @xmath440 and @xmath441 then @xmath442 . we have , by the definition of expected interference ( explanations below ) , @xmath443 where the first inequality follows from the definition of sets @xmath444 and the assumption of the claim , the second one follows by @xmath435 and @xmath445 , the third one is a rearrangement of the sum , the fourth one follows by the fact that @xmath446 for every @xmath447 and @xmath448 ( here , @xmath449 ) , and the last one follows because @xmath450 . thus , if @xmath441 then the claim follows . let us put the nodes in an arbitrary order and let @xmath451 denote the number of rounds @xmath452 s.t . @xmath453 , where @xmath454 is the @xmath455-th node in @xmath456 . by corollary [ co : pexpectation ] , @xmath457= o(\phi_i^{-k})\cdot|h| $ ] holds for each @xmath458 . let @xmath459 denote the number of rounds in @xmath129 when @xmath460 . by claim [ le : pexpectal ] , @xmath461 $ ] can be bounded as follows , @xmath462\leq\sum_{i}\sum_{j}e[z_{i , j } ] \leq \sum_i|s_i\setminus s_{i-1}|\cdot o(\phi_i^{-k})\cdot |h| \leq \frac{\sigma}{3}|h|,\ ] ] where the last inequality holds if @xmath463 for a large enough constant @xmath464 ; we have @xmath465 and @xmath466 with @xmath467 ( by definition ) , so we have @xmath468 . each @xmath451 can be considered as the sum of binary random variables similar to that in the proof of lemma [ le : phi ] . thus , @xmath459 can also be seen as the sum of binary random variables . moreover , the binary random variables satisfy the conditions of the chernoff bound in lemma [ le : chernoff ] . thus , by taking @xmath469 and @xmath470 , we have : @xmath471\leq 2^{-\sigma|h|/3}\le n^{-3}. $ ] [ le : broadgood ] let @xmath472 , @xmath473 and @xmath474 , where @xmath475 are the parameters of . let @xmath56 be a round such that for a node @xmath20 , @xmath476 and @xmath477 . + if a node in @xmath332 transmits in round @xmath56 then it mass - delivers , with probability at least @xmath478 . let @xmath1 be the transmitting node , which could possibly be @xmath20 itself . the probability that no other node in @xmath479 transmits is @xmath480 where we used lemma [ ieq ] with the assumption that @xmath481 and the bounded contention assumption . on the other hand , we have that @xmath482\ge 9/10 $ ] . indeed , @xmath483\ge 9/10 $ ] follows by the bounded interference assumption and markov inequality , so it suffices to show that @xmath484 , which we have because for each node @xmath485 , @xmath486 , implying that @xmath487 thus , we have that with probability @xmath478 , @xmath1 transmits , no other node in @xmath217 transmits and the interference from @xmath488 at @xmath1 is at most @xmath68 , so @xmath1 delivers its message , by . * proposition [ pr : pdecrease ] * _ assume that constants @xmath137 are large enough . for each node @xmath1 and phase @xmath129 , if at least @xmath138-fraction of the rounds of @xmath129 are of high contention , then @xmath139 nodes in @xmath140 mass - deliver , with probability @xmath135 . _ let @xmath489 . let us choose constants @xmath490 such that prop . [ pr : pgoodroundl ] holds for @xmath491 and @xmath492 and such that @xmath493 is large enough , as stated below , where @xmath475 are the parameters of . we will use the fact that in prop . [ pr : pgoodroundl ] , @xmath394 has the following dependency on @xmath494 : @xmath495 , where @xmath0 is the edge change parameter ( see the proof of prop . [ pr : lowc ] ) . we set @xmath496 . namely , if we choose @xmath137 large enough ( satisfying the relation above ) , then we have that with probability @xmath135 , there are at least @xmath497 rounds @xmath358 such that @xmath498 and @xmath499 . let @xmath56 be such a round . for each node @xmath500 , it holds that @xmath501 and @xmath502 . let us fix a node @xmath500 . first note that @xmath503 , implying that @xmath504 . it remains to bound the expected interference at @xmath20 by nodes in @xmath488 . this interference can be split into two parts : 1 . the interference by nodes in @xmath505 and 2 . the interference by nodes in @xmath506 . the first part can be bounded by @xmath507 using a computation as in the proof of lemma [ le : broadgood ] . the second part can be bounded as follows : the contention in the area @xmath506 is at most @xmath394 and the distance of those nodes to node @xmath20 is at least @xmath76 , so the expected interference by nodes in @xmath506 is at most @xmath508 , and is less than @xmath509 if @xmath76 is large enough , as @xmath510 . here we used the assumption that @xmath511 . recall that there are at least @xmath512 high contention rounds for node @xmath1 , i.e. rounds where @xmath122 . let @xmath56 be such a round . by the bounded independence property , there is a @xmath513-cover @xmath39 of @xmath119 of constant size . by the pigeonhole principle , there is a node @xmath399 such that @xmath514 . by summarizing the above said , we get that there are at least @xmath497 rounds @xmath56 s.t . for all nodes @xmath500 , @xmath515 and @xmath516 . on the other hand , there are at least @xmath512 rounds where there is a node in @xmath119 that has @xmath517 . thus , there are at least @xmath518 rounds @xmath56 with the following property : there is a node @xmath500 such that @xmath519 and @xmath516 . fix such round @xmath56 and node @xmath20 . by lemma [ le : broadgood ] , there is a node @xmath520 that transmits ( the probability of this is at least @xmath521 ) and delivers its message with probability @xmath522 . thus , the expected number of nodes in @xmath119 that deliver their message during @xmath129 is @xmath523 . the proof now follows by applying a chernoff bound with the assumption that the constant @xmath128 is large enough : @xmath524 . * proposition [ pr : idle ] * _ assume that @xmath137 are large enough . for each node @xmath1 and phase @xmath129 , if at least @xmath141-fraction of the rounds of @xmath129 are low contention rounds , then with probability @xmath135 , in at least @xmath142-fraction of the rounds of @xmath129 , @xmath1 will detect idle channel and have low contention and low interference . _ let @xmath525 . assume that @xmath137 large enough , such that prop . [ pr : pgoodroundl ] holds for @xmath526 and @xmath527 , where @xmath528 is the parameter of . let @xmath418 denote the event that there are at least @xmath529 good rounds for @xmath1 in phase @xmath129 . by prop . [ pr : pgoodroundl ] , we have @xmath419 = 1-o(n^{-3})\ge 19/20 $ ] , if @xmath128 is large enough . given @xmath418 , there are at least @xmath530 rounds @xmath56 that are both good and low contention for @xmath1 . let @xmath159 denote the set of such rounds and let @xmath350 be a binary random variable with value 1 if and only if @xmath1 detects idle channel in round @xmath161 . let @xmath531 . for each round @xmath161 , since @xmath56 is a good round and @xmath532 , it holds with probability at least @xmath141 that the interference at node @xmath1 from nodes in @xmath119 is at most @xmath528 . given this and the fact that in low contention rounds we have @xmath533 , @xmath1 will detect idle channel with probability at least @xmath534 in round @xmath56 . thus , in each round @xmath161 , irrespective of prior rounds , we have @xmath535\ge 81/100 $ ] . this implies : @xmath420\ge ( 9 ^ 2/10 ^ 2)|h'|\ge \frac{9 ^ 2}{10 ^ 2}\cdot \frac{9 ^ 2}{10 ^ 2}|h|$ ] and @xmath536 \ge ( 19/20)\cdot\frac{9 ^ 4}{10 ^ 4}|h| > 0.62|h|.\ ] ] just as in the proof of lemma [ le : phi ] , we can now apply chernoff bound to obtain that @xmath537 < n^{-3}$ ] if @xmath128 is large enough . this completes the proof by recalling that all rounds of @xmath370 are low contention and low interference rounds for node @xmath1 . * theorem [ thm : broadcast ] * _ assume the edge change rate @xmath100 is sufficiently small . there are constants @xmath201 , such that when running bcast(@xmath114 ) in the synchronous mode , each node @xmath1 receives the message in @xmath202 rounds w.h.p . _ let us fix constants @xmath155 so that props . [ pr : pdecrease ] and [ pr : idle ] hold with interference threshold @xmath203 , where @xmath204 and @xmath205 are the parameters corresponding to precision @xmath183 . we set the passiveness parameter of try&adjust to @xmath206 and the stable distance parameter @xmath207 . consider a node @xmath20 that receives the message in round @xmath56 . let @xmath1 be such that @xmath208 in the time interval @xmath209 $ ] ( and both stay alive during @xmath96 ) . the theorem follows by an induction and union bound from the claim below . node @xmath1 gets the message of @xmath20 during @xmath96 , with probability @xmath210 . we prove the claim by contradiction , and assume that @xmath1 can not get the message during @xmath96 . let us split @xmath96 into phases ( for @xmath20 ) and , similar to the proof of thm . [ thm : localbroadcast ] , classify the phases @xmath129 into types : ( type a ) at least @xmath138-th of rounds in @xmath129 are high contention rounds for @xmath20 @xmath211 , and ( type b ) at least @xmath141-th of rounds in @xmath129 are low contention rounds for @xmath20 @xmath212 . we show that with probability @xmath135 , all phases in @xmath96 are of type b. consider a type a phase @xmath129 . we know from prop . [ pr : pdecrease ] that , with probability @xmath135 , there is a set @xmath39 of @xmath139 nodes in @xmath140 that deliver their messages and restart try&adjust during @xmath129 . we split @xmath39 into three subsets , @xmath213 those inserted by churn during @xmath129 , @xmath214 those inserted by edge change during @xmath129 and @xmath215 the rest . consider @xmath214 first . we know that in each local neighborhood , there are at most @xmath216 nodes arriving due to edge changes . note that @xmath217 can be covered with @xmath218 local neighborhoods ; hence , the total number of nodes arriving in @xmath217 due to edge changes is @xmath219 . since @xmath220 , setting @xmath221 a small enough constant gives @xmath222 . now consider @xmath215 . by the primitive , for each node @xmath223 , all nodes in @xmath224 also restart try&adjust , setting their transmission probability to @xmath225 . by the setting of @xmath226 , the probability that a node restarting try&adjust in phase @xmath129 transmits again in @xmath129 is at most @xmath227 . thus , with probability at least @xmath135 , the nodes in @xmath214 constitute an @xmath228-packing of @xmath140 and are at most @xmath229 . as for @xmath213 , the probability that a newly arriving node transmits during phase @xmath129 is at most @xmath227 , so @xmath230 w.h.p . these bounds lead to a contradiction @xmath231 , if constant @xmath128 is large enough . thus , each phase @xmath129 of @xmath96 is of type b with probability @xmath135 . it remains to recall that @xmath96 contains constant number of phases . now assume that @xmath129 is of type b. in a similar way as in theorem [ thm : localbroadcast ] , we can apply prop . [ pr : idle ] and show that if @xmath232 at the beginning of @xmath129 , then by the end of @xmath129 , the effect on @xmath71 is equivalent to applying at least @xmath233 of @xmath234 operations on @xmath235 . since @xmath236 at the beginning of @xmath96 is at least @xmath225 , it will take at most 11 phases to increase the probability to the value @xmath164 . then , a single phase will suffice for @xmath20 to deliver its message ( including to node @xmath1 ) , with probability at least @xmath210 . the basic observation is that if all the nodes start running bcast@xmath240 simultaneously , a _ constant density dominating set _ can be computed in @xmath200 rounds ( cf . @xcite ) , where an @xmath33-dominating set of density @xmath538 is a set @xmath39 of nodes such that for each node @xmath20 , @xmath539 . the dominator algorithm is as follows : all nodes run bcast@xmath240 simultaneously , and 1 . if a node @xmath1 stops by then it is a _ dominator _ , if a node @xmath20 stops by detecting of node @xmath1 then it is dominated by @xmath1 . having formed a constant density dominating set , it remains to disseminate the message using only dominators . in order for the set of dominators to derive the connectivity properties of the original graph , we need that @xmath30 forms a @xmath540-bounded independence _ metric _ space . in the static spontaneous setting , there is a uniform algorithm that performs broadcast in @xmath541 rounds , w.h.p . [ thm : static - spont - bcast ] the algorithm for spontaneous broadcast consists of two stages : 1 . compute a constant density @xmath542-dominating set @xmath543 , 2 . transmit the message using only the nodes in @xmath543 . [ [ dominating - set . ] ] dominating set . + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + the dominating set is constructed by running bcast@xmath240 in the spontaneous mode , i.e. all nodes start running the algorithm simultaneously . let @xmath543 be the set of nodes that stop the algorithm by . since the dominated nodes use @xmath544 as a stopping condition , @xmath543 is a @xmath542-dominating set . moreover , @xmath543 is a @xmath545-packing , which implies that each in - ball @xmath46 of radius @xmath546 contains at most @xmath547 dominators . in particular each node @xmath20 is dominated by at most constant number of dominators . the proof the algorithm terminates after at most @xmath200 rounds is almost identical to the proof of theorem [ thm : broadcast ] . [ [ broadcast . ] ] broadcast . + + + + + + + + + + recall that we assume that the communication graph is connected and has diameter @xmath243 . also , since @xmath548 is a metric , the graph is undirected . the broadcast part is as follows : in the first round , the source node transmits the message to its neighbors ; each dominator @xmath20 , upon receiving the message , transmits it in each round with probability @xmath232 until detecting ( @xmath183 ) , where @xmath235 is a small enough constant . note that as soon as all dominators successfully transmit at least once , all nodes will get the message . moreover , if the constant @xmath235 is small enough , then the two algorithms can be run simultaneously : the key point is that the number of dominators in each @xmath549-neighborhood is bounded by a constant ( not depending on @xmath235 ) . this ensures that the nodes _ need not know @xmath16 _ , in order to coordinate the two algorithms . it remains to show that the message will get to all dominators in @xmath244 rounds using the broadcast algorithm . consider a graph @xmath129 defined over the dominating set @xmath543 , where for every pair of nodes @xmath550 , @xmath551 form an edge if @xmath552 . the diameter of @xmath129 is at most @xmath243 . note that for every pair of nodes @xmath553 with @xmath554 , the corresponding dominators @xmath555 and @xmath556 are adjacent in @xmath129 . indeed , by the definition of the dominating set , we have @xmath557 let @xmath558 be two arbitrary nodes in @xmath543 and let @xmath19 be the path of length at most @xmath243 in @xmath238 connecting nodes @xmath555 and @xmath556 . by the observation above , if we replace each node @xmath559 with its dominator @xmath560 , we obtain a path @xmath561 of length @xmath46 in @xmath129 , connecting @xmath555 and @xmath556 . the completes the proof of the claim . for every transmitting node @xmath562 , the probability that @xmath274 delivers its message to all its neighbors in @xmath129 is @xmath563 in each round @xmath56 , if constant @xmath235 is sufficiently small . let @xmath39 denote the set of neighbors of node @xmath274 in @xmath129 , i.e. the nodes of @xmath543 that are at distance at most @xmath564 from @xmath274 . it suffices to show that all nodes in @xmath39 receive the message in a fixed round @xmath56 where @xmath274 transmits with @xmath563 probability . this event holds if the interference at @xmath274 is no more than @xmath68 event @xmath565 , and no other node transmits in @xmath566 event @xmath567 , in round @xmath56 . by the properties of the dominating set , the contention in a ball of radius @xmath568 is at most @xmath569 . similarly to the proof of prop . [ pr : pinterferenceboundl ] , it can be shown that the expected interference by nodes in @xmath570 is @xmath571 . thus , by markov inequality , @xmath572 if @xmath235 is small enough . on the other hand , since the contention in @xmath566 is @xmath571 , @xmath573 follows by lemma [ ieq ] . thus , @xmath574 . given that each informed node in @xmath543 has probability at least @xmath575 of successfully broadcasting the message , the rest of the proof essentially follows along the lines of the proof of ( * ? ? ? * lemma 6 ) . we present a sketch of the proof for completeness of the argument . let @xmath576 be the set of nodes in @xmath543 that have been informed by round @xmath56 , where @xmath577 contains only the source node . let us fix a node @xmath578 and let @xmath579 be the distance ( in graph @xmath129 ) from @xmath1 to the nearest node in @xmath576 . note that @xmath580 . the difference @xmath581 is the progress made in round @xmath56 and is a bernoulli random variable with @xmath582\ge \eta$ ] for all @xmath56 when @xmath583 and @xmath584 otherwise . let @xmath585 be a random variable that has the same distribution as @xmath586 when @xmath583 and is an i.i.d . bernoulli random variable with mean @xmath587 otherwise . let @xmath588 . note that node @xmath1 has been informed by round @xmath56 iff @xmath589 . thus , we need to bound the probability @xmath590 . let @xmath591 . it is easy to show that the sequence @xmath592 is a submartingale . moreover , for a round @xmath593 and constant @xmath594 , @xmath595 implies that @xmath596 . since the sequence @xmath592 is a submartingale , we can apply azuma - hoeffding bound to show that @xmath597 . now the theorem follows by union bound over all nodes , by choosing the constant @xmath260 large enough . * theorem [ thm : brlowerbound ] * _ for every ( possibly randomized ) broadcast algorithm @xmath246 that uses neither node coordinates nor primitive , there is a @xmath247-bounded - independence metric space where @xmath246 needs @xmath248 rounds to do broadcast in a @xmath249-broadcastable network , even if the nodes have and primitives and operate spontaneously . _ assume that @xmath598 . we present the construction using a distance function @xmath548 : it is then straightforward to construct the corresponding path - loss matrix . denote @xmath599 . first , assume the nodes operate non - spontaneously , i.e. a non - source node may need to receive a message in order to start participating in a protocol . recall that @xmath600 . consider @xmath16 points @xmath601 , such that for every @xmath602 , it holds that @xmath603 , @xmath604 , @xmath605 and @xmath606 , where @xmath607 ( see the diagram in fig . [ fig : nonspon ] ) . clearly , this set of points forms a @xmath608-bounded independence metric space . we place @xmath16 wireless nodes at distinct points @xmath601 uniformly at random . let @xmath195 be the node at @xmath609 . we assume , further , that communication only happens according to ; in particular , if the interference at a node is more than @xmath68 then _ none _ of its neighbors receives its transmission . note that broadcast in this network can be completed in 2 steps , starting at any point . note also that @xmath610 can not be directly reached from nodes @xmath195 with @xmath611 . moreover , if at least @xmath612 nodes @xmath195 with @xmath611 transmit simultaneously , _ no node _ receives a message , including the potential communication between @xmath613 and @xmath610 . this follows by observing that @xmath614 : the signal power at the neighboring nodes must be more than the interference threshold , otherwise a node could receive two signals of the same power . assume @xmath195 with some @xmath611 is the source . at the first round of the algorithm , nodes @xmath615 receive the message . let @xmath616 denote the event that @xmath613 transmits and no more than @xmath617 nodes @xmath195 with @xmath611 transmit in round @xmath56 . by the observations above , @xmath610 will not receive the message until @xmath616 happens . moreover , during the subsequent steps of the algorithm , until @xmath616 happens for the first time , all nodes at @xmath615 will have the same history and will be symmetric with respect to and primitives . it remains to bound the expected time until @xmath616 happens for the first time . we can assume w.l.o.g . that in each round there are no more than @xmath187 nodes transmitting . as discussed above , if @xmath610 is not informed in such a round , then the nodes that transmitted in the given round can learn at best that none of them is at @xmath613 and stop transmitting thereafter . thus , we can assume that after each unsuccessful round there are at most @xmath618 nodes that stop transmitting and the probability @xmath619 of success at round @xmath620 ( if no success occurred before round @xmath33 ) is at most @xmath621 where the numerator counts the number subsets of an @xmath622-element set that contain a fixed element ( the node @xmath613 ) and no more than @xmath187 elements in total , and the denominator counts all subsets containing no more than @xmath187 elements . a further straightforward calculation shows that the expected number of rounds until the first success is @xmath248 ( see e.g. ( * ? ? ? Abstract:

Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.

Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered . Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video . Paper: an _ orbitope _ is the convex hull of an orbit of a compact algebraic group @xmath2 acting linearly on a real vector space . the orbit has the structure of a real algebraic variety , and the orbitope is a convex , semi - algebraic set . thus , the study of algebraic orbitopes lies at the heart of _ convex algebraic geometry _ the fusion of convex geometry and ( real ) algebraic geometry . orbitopes have appeared in many contexts in mathematics and its applications . orbitopes of finite groups are highly symmetric convex polytopes which include the platonic solids , permutahedra , birkhoff polytopes , and other favorites from ziegler s text book @xcite , as well as the coxeter orbihedra studied by mccarthy , ogilvie , zobin , and zobin @xcite . farran and robertson s regular convex bodies @xcite are orbitopal generalzations of regular polytopes , which were classified by madden and robertson @xcite . orbitopes for compact lie groups , such as @xmath0 , have appeared in investigations ranging from protein structure prediction @xcite and quantum information @xcite to calibrated geometries @xcite . barvinok and blekherman studied the volumes of convex bodies dual to certain @xmath0-orbitopes , and they concluded that there are many more non - negative polynomials than sums of squares @xcite . this paper initiates the study of orbitopes as geometric objects in their own right . the questions we ask about orbitopes originate from three different perspectives : _ convexity _ , _ algebraic geometry _ , and _ optimization_. in convexity , one would seek to characterize all faces of an orbitope . in algebraic geometry , one would examine the zariski closure of its boundary and identify the components and singularities of that hypersurface . in optimization , one would ask whether the orbitope is a spectrahedron or the projection of a spectrahedron . spectrahedra are to semidefinite programming what polyhedra are to linear programming . more precisely , a _ spectrahedron _ is the intersection of the cone of positive semidefinite matrices with an affine space . it can be represented as the set of points @xmath3 such that @xmath4 where @xmath5 are symmetric matrices and @xmath6 denotes positive semidefiniteness . from a spectrahedral description many geometric properties , both convex and algebraic , are within reach . furthermore , if an orbitope admits a representation ( [ eq : lmi ] ) then it is easy to maximize or minimize a linear function over that orbitope . here is a simple illustration . [ ex : hankelsmall ] consider the action of the group @xmath7 on the space @xmath8 of binary quartics and take the convex hull of the orbit of @xmath9 . the four - dimensional convex body @xmath10 is a _ carathodory orbitope_. this orbitope is a spectrahedron : it coincides with the set of all binary quartics @xmath11 such that @xmath12 this representation ( [ 3by3hankel ] ) will be derived in section 5 , where we will also see that it is equivalent to classical results from the theory of positive polynomials @xcite . the hankel matrix shows that the boundary of @xmath10 is an irreducible cubic hypersurface in @xmath13 , defined by the vanishing of the hankel determinant . it also reveals that this four - dimensional carathodory orbitope is @xmath14-neighborly : the extreme points are the rank one matrices , and any two of them are connected by an edge . the typical intersection of @xmath10 with a three - dimensional affine plane looks like an inflated tetrahedron . this three - dimensional convex body is bounded by _ cayley s cubic surface _ , shown in figure [ f : fat_tetrahedron ] . alternative pictures of this convex body can be found in ( * ? ? ? * fig . 3 ) and ( * ? ? ? * fig . 4 ) . the four vertices of the tetrahedron lie on the curve @xmath15 , and its six edges are inclusion - maximal faces of @xmath10 . @xmath16{figures / free - spec}\ ] ] -0.3 cm [ f : fat_tetrahedron ] this article is organized as follows . we begin by deriving the basic definitions and a few general results about orbitopes , and we formulate * ten key questions * which will guide our subsequent investigations . these are organized along the themes of convex geometry ( subsection 2.1 ) , algebraic geometry ( subsection 2.2 ) and optimization ( subsection 2.3 ) . these questions are difficult . they are meant to motivate the reader and to guide our investigations . we are not yet able to offer a complete solution to any of these ten problems . section 3 is concerned with the action of @xmath1 and @xmath0 by conjugation on @xmath17-matrices . these decompose into the actions by conjugation on symmetric and skew - symmetric matrices . the resulting _ schur - horn orbitopes _ are shown be spectrahedra , their algebraic boundary is computed , and their face lattices are derived from certain polytopes known as permutahedra . the spectrahedral representations of the schur - horn orbitopes , stated in theorems [ thm : symspec ] and [ thm : skewsymspec ] , rely on certain schur functors also known as the _ additive compound matrices_. given a compact real algebraic group of @xmath17-matrices , we can form its convex hull in @xmath18 . the resulting convex bodies are the _ tautological orbitopes_. in subsection 4.2 we study the tautological orbitope and its dual coorbitope for the group @xmath1 . both are spectrahedra , characterized by constraints on singular values , and they are unit balls for the operator and nuclear matrix norm considered in @xcite . subsections 4.1 and 4.4 are devoted to the tautological orbitope for @xmath0 . a characterization of its faces is given in theorem [ thm : sontauto ] . the orbitopes of the group @xmath19 are the convex hulls of trigonometric curves , a classical topic initiated by carathodory in @xcite , further developed in @xcite , and our primary focus in section 5 . these @xmath19-orbitopes can be represented as projections of spectrahedra in two distinct ways : in terms of hermitian toeplitz matrices or in terms of hankel matrices . a natural generalization of the rational normal curves in section 5 are the veronese varieties . their convex hulls , the _ veronese orbitopes _ , are dual to the cones of polynomials that are non - negative on @xmath20 , as seen in @xcite . in section 6 we undertake a detailed study of the @xmath21-dimensional veronese orbitope and its coorbitope which arise from ternary quartics . in section 7 we mesh our investigations with a line of research in differential geometry . the _ grassmann orbitope _ is the convex hull of the oriented grassmann variety in its plcker embedding in the unit sphere in @xmath22 . this vector space is the @xmath23-th exterior power of @xmath24 and it is isomorphic to @xmath25 . the facial structure of grassmann orbitopes has been studied in the theory of calibrated manifolds @xcite . we take a fresh look at these orbitopes from the point of view of convex algebraic geometry . theorem [ thm : g2n ] furnishes a spectrahedral representation and the algebraic boundary in the special case @xmath26 , while theorem [ thm : g36bad ] shows that the grassmann orbitopes fail to be spectrahedra in general . let @xmath2 be a real , compact , linear algebraic group , that is , a compact subgroup of @xmath27 for some @xmath28 given as a subvariety . prototypic examples are the _ special orthogonal group _ @xmath29 and the _ unitary group _ @xmath30 . a real representation of @xmath2 is a group homomorphism @xmath31 for some finite dimensional real vector space @xmath32 . we will write @xmath33 for @xmath34 and @xmath35 . the representation is _ rational _ if @xmath36 is a rational map of algebraic varieties . by choosing an inner product @xmath37 on @xmath32 , we may define a @xmath2-invariant inner product as @xmath38 here @xmath39 denotes the _ haar measure _ , which is the unique @xmath2-invariant probability measure on @xmath2 . choosing coordinates on @xmath32 so that @xmath40 becomes the standard inner product on @xmath41 , we can identify the matrix group @xmath2 with a subgroup of the _ orthogonal group _ @xmath42 . the _ orbit _ of a vector @xmath35 under the compact group @xmath2 is the set @xmath43 . this is a bounded subset of @xmath32 . the orbit @xmath44 is a smooth , compact real algebraic variety of dimension @xmath45 here @xmath46 is the _ stabilizer _ of the vector @xmath47 . in particular , the orbit is isomorphic as a @xmath2-variety to the compact homogeneous space @xmath48 . the _ orbitope _ of @xmath2 with respect to the vector @xmath35 is the semialgebraic convex body @xmath49 we tacitly assume that the group @xmath2 and its representation @xmath36 are clear from the context and sometimes we write @xmath50 or @xmath51 for @xmath52 . the dimension of an orbitope @xmath53 is the dimension of the affine hull of the orbit @xmath54 . for small @xmath55 , the connected subgroups of the orthogonal group @xmath1 are known . this leads to the following census of low - dimensional orbitopes of connected groups . @xmath56 we identify @xmath2 with a subgroup of @xmath0 . we assume @xmath57 is an @xmath55-dimensional orbitope in @xmath24 . this implies that @xmath2 fixes no non - zero vector . here is our census : _ @xmath58 : _ there are no one - dimensional orbitopes because @xmath59 is a point . it is known that every proper connected subgroup of @xmath19 or @xmath60 fixes a non - zero vector , so for @xmath61 , the subgroup @xmath2 must be equal to @xmath0 . this establishes the next two cases : _ @xmath62 : _ the only orbitopes in @xmath63 are the discs @xmath64 . _ @xmath65 : _ the only orbitopes in @xmath66 are the balls @xmath67 . the four - dimensional case is where things begin to get interesting : _ @xmath68 : _ the group @xmath69 has connected subgroups @xmath2 of dimension @xmath70 , @xmath14 , @xmath71 and @xmath72 . * if @xmath73 then @xmath74 and the orbitopes are balls in @xmath13 . * if @xmath75 then @xmath76 , acting as the unit quaternions on all quaternions , @xmath77 , by either left or right multiplication . here the orbitopes are also balls in @xmath13 . * if @xmath78 then @xmath79 . these tori act on @xmath13 through an orthogonal direct sum decomposition @xmath80 and their orbitopes are products of two discs . * if @xmath81 then @xmath82 and we obtain four - dimensional orbitopes that are isomorphic , for some positive integers @xmath83 , to the carathodory orbitopes @xmath84\bigr\}\,.\ ] ] these orbitopes were introduced one century ago by carathodory @xcite . their study was picked up in the 1980s by smilansky @xcite and recently by barvinok and novik @xcite . we note that @xmath85 is affinely isomorphic to the hankel orbitope in example [ ex : hankelsmall ] . to compute the dimensions of orbitopes in general we shall need a pinch of representation theory @xcite . a representation @xmath32 of the group @xmath2 is _ irreducible _ if its only subrepresentations are @xmath86 and @xmath32 . if @xmath32 and @xmath87 are irreducible representations , then the space @xmath88 of equivariant linear maps between them is zero unless @xmath89 . schur s lemma states that @xmath90 is a division algebra over @xmath91 , that is , either @xmath91 , @xmath92 , or @xmath93 . if @xmath94 is a complete list of distinct irreducible representations of @xmath2 , and @xmath32 is any representation of @xmath2 , then we have a canonical decomposition into isotypical representations : @xmath95 this is an isomorphism of @xmath2-modules . the map ( [ eq : isotypical ] ) on each summand is @xmath96 . the image of the @xmath97th summand in @xmath32 is called the _ @xmath98-isotypical component of @xmath32 _ , and when it is non - zero , we say that the irreducible representation @xmath98 _ appears _ in the @xmath2-module @xmath32 . we say that @xmath32 is _ multiplicity - free _ if each irreducible representation @xmath98 appears in @xmath32 at most once , so that @xmath99 has rank 1 or 0 over @xmath100 . suppose that @xmath32 contains the trivial representation and write @xmath101 , where @xmath102 is the trivial isotypical component of @xmath32 and @xmath103 does not contain the trivial representation . any vector @xmath104 can be written as @xmath105 , where @xmath106 and @xmath107 . thus we lose no geometric information in assuming that @xmath32 does not contain the trivial representation . this property ensures that the linear span of an orbit coincides with its affine span . hence the affine span of an orbitope decomposes along its isotypical components : @xmath109 to determine the dimension of @xmath110 for @xmath47 in a single isotypical component @xmath32 we proceed as follows . let @xmath111 with @xmath87 irreducible . then @xmath112 and the affine span of @xmath54 is isomorphic to @xmath113 , where @xmath114 is the rank of the @xmath115-module spanned by @xmath116 . hence , the dimension of @xmath117 over @xmath91 equals @xmath118 . in particular , @xmath119 . if @xmath32 is multiplicity free and @xmath47 has a nonzero projection into each isotypical component of @xmath32 , then @xmath120 . we see this in the carathodory orbitopes for the group @xmath19 of @xmath121 rotation matrices . its nontrivial representations are @xmath122 , where a rotation matric acts through its @xmath123th power , for @xmath124 . let @xmath125 be the orbitope of @xmath19 with respect to a general vector @xmath126 . if @xmath127 , then @xmath32 has two isotypical components and @xmath125 has dimension four . if @xmath128 , then @xmath129 consists of a single isotypical component and @xmath130 is two - dimensional , as @xmath131 , the span of @xmath132 is complex one - dimensional . orbitopes are convex bodies , and it is natural to begin their study from the perspective of classical convexity . a point @xmath133 in a convex body @xmath134 is an _ extreme point _ if @xmath135 . thus , the set @xmath136 of extreme points of @xmath137 is the minimal subset satisfying @xmath138 . an extrinsic description of @xmath137 is given by its _ support function _ @xmath139 in terms of the support function , the convex body @xmath137 is the set of points @xmath140 such that @xmath141 for every @xmath142 . each linear functional @xmath142 defines an _ exposed face _ of @xmath137 : @xmath143 an exposed face @xmath144 is itself a convex body of dimension @xmath145 . an exposed face of dimension @xmath146 is called an _ exposed point _ of @xmath137 . it follows that every exposed point is extreme , but the inclusion is typically strict . however , for orbitopes , these two notions coincide . every point in the orbit @xmath147 is exposed in its convex hull . in particular , every extreme point of the orbitope @xmath148 is an exposed point . since @xmath2 acts orthogonally on @xmath32 , the orbit @xmath147 lies entirely in the sphere in @xmath32 that is centered at @xmath146 and contains the point @xmath47 . as every point of the sphere is exposed , the entire orbit consists of exposed points and hence extreme points . a closed subset @xmath149 is a _ face _ if @xmath150 contains the two endpoints to any open segment in @xmath137 it intersects . this includes @xmath151 and @xmath137 itself . an inclusion - maximal proper face of @xmath137 is called a _ facet_. by separation , every face is contained in an exposed face and thus facets are automatically exposed . in general , every exposed face is a face but not conversely . when does an orbitope have only exposed faces ? the exposed faces of a convex body form a partially ordered set with respect to inclusion , called the _ face lattice_. the face lattice is atomic but in general not coatomic as was pointed out to us by stephan weis . a necessary condition is that the polar body ( see below ) has all faces exposed ( cf . @xcite ) . also , it is generally not graded because `` being a face of '' is not a transitive relation . for example , the four - dimensional barvinok - novik orbitope in section [ s : caratheodory ] has triangular exposed faces for which the three vertices are exposed but the edges are not . similar behavior is seen in the convex body on the right of figure [ f : trig_curves ] , which has two triangular exposed facets whose edges and two of three vertices are not exposed . [ question2 ] describe the face lattices of orbitopes . for an orbitope @xmath152 , the faces come in @xmath2-orbits and these @xmath2-orbits come in algebraic families . in particular , the zero - dimensional faces come in a family parametrized by @xmath2 . the description of these families is the point of question [ question2 ] . for instance , the orbitope in example [ ex : hankelsmall ] is a four - dimensional , two - neighborly convex body . its exposed points are parametrized by the circle @xmath153 and the edges come in a two - dimensional family . the _ polar body _ @xmath154 is called the _ coorbitope _ of @xmath2 with respect to @xmath104 . our assumption that @xmath32 does not contain the trivial representation ensures that @xmath146 is the centroid of @xmath51 , and this implies @xmath155 . we shall also make use of the cone over the coorbitope @xmath156 . this is the _ coorbitope cone _ @xmath157 for a convex body @xmath137 the assignment @xmath158 defines an _ ( asymmetric ) norm _ on @xmath32 with unit ball @xmath137 . if @xmath137 is centrally - symmetric with respect to the origin , then @xmath159 is an actual norm . in that case the polar body @xmath160 is also centrally - symmetric and @xmath161 is the _ dual norm_. norms and support functions are related by @xmath162 in particular , if @xmath137 is an orbitope , then @xmath159 and @xmath161 are @xmath2-equivariant norms . every point @xmath133 in a convex body @xmath137 is in the convex hull of finitely many extreme points . we denote by @xmath163 the least cardinality of a set @xmath136 of extreme points with @xmath164 . we call @xmath165 the _ carathodory number _ of @xmath137 . carathodory s theorem ( see e.g. @xcite ) asserts that @xmath166 is bounded from above by @xmath167 . fenchel showed that @xmath168 when the set of extreme points of @xmath137 is connected @xcite . note that the carathodory number of an orbitope @xmath169 in general depends on @xmath47 ( cf . * theorem 4.9 ) ) whereas , for multiplicity - free representations , the dimension of @xmath50 does not . what are the carathodory numbers of orbitopes ? we refer to the recent work of barvinok and blekherman @xcite for more information about the convex geometry of orbitopes and coorbitopes , especially with regard to their volumes . here we look at orbitopes as objects in real algebraic geometry . fix a rational representation @xmath170 of a compact connected algebraic group @xmath2 . every orbit @xmath44 is an irreducible real algebraic variety in @xmath171 , and we may ask for its prime ideal . by the tarski - seidenberg theorem @xcite , the orbitope is a semi - algebraic set . which orbitopes are _ basic _ semi - algebraic sets , i.e. for which triples @xmath172 can @xmath10 be described by a finite conjunction of polynomial equations and inequalities ? the boundary @xmath173 of an orbitope @xmath51 in @xmath171 is a compact semi - algebraic set of codimension one in its affine span @xmath174 . the zariski closure of @xmath173 is denoted by @xmath175 . we call it the _ algebraic boundary _ of @xmath51 . if @xmath176 then the algebraic boundary @xmath175 is the zero set of a unique ( up to scaling ) reduced polynomial @xmath177 whose coefficients lie in the field of definition of @xmath172 . that field of definition will often be the rational numbers @xmath178 . since scalars in @xmath179 have an exact representation in computer algebra , but scalars in @xmath91 require numerical floating point approximations , we seek to use @xmath179 instead of @xmath91 wherever possible . [ ques : algbound ] how to calculate the algebraic boundary @xmath180 of an orbitope @xmath181 ? the irreducible factors of the polynomial @xmath177 that cuts out @xmath182 arise from various singularities in the boundary @xmath183 of the coorbitope @xmath184 . we believe that a complete answer to question [ ques : algbound ] will involve a whitney stratification of the real algebraic hypersurface @xmath185 . recall that a _ whitney stratification _ is a decomposition into locally closed submanifolds ( strata ) in which the singularity type of each stratum is locally constant along the stratum . the faces of a polytope form a whitney stratification of its boundary , which is dual to the stratification of the polar polytope . we expect a similar duality between the whitney stratification of the boundary of an orbitope and of the boundary of its coorbitope . how to compute and study the algebraic boundary @xmath186 of the coorbitope @xmath187 ? is every component of @xmath188 the dual variety to a stratum in a whitney stratification of @xmath185 ? recall that the _ dual variety _ @xmath189 of a subvariety @xmath190 in @xmath171 is the zariski closure of the set of all affine hyperplanes that are tangent to @xmath190 at some regular point . when studying this duality , algebraic geometers usually work in complex projective space @xmath191 rather than real affine space @xmath192 . in some of the examples for @xmath193 seen in this paper , the algebraic boundary @xmath185 of the coorbitope @xmath184 coincides with the dual variety @xmath189 of the orbit @xmath194 . a good example for this is the discriminantal hypersurface in corollary [ cor : discrorbi ] . more generally , we have the impression that the hypersurface @xmath185 is often irreducible while @xmath182 tends to be reducible . for further appearances of dual varieties in convex algebraic geometry see @xcite . @xmath114-th secant variety _ of @xmath15 is the zariski closure of all @xmath195-flats spanned by points of @xmath54 . the study of secant varieties leads to lower bounds for the carathodory number : [ prop : secant ] if @xmath196 then the @xmath114-th secant variety of @xmath15 is the ambient space @xmath171 . let @xmath197 . the set of points that lie in the convex hull of @xmath198 points of @xmath15 is dense in @xmath50 and hence is zariski dense in @xmath171 . the @xmath114-th secant variety contains that set . the lower bound for @xmath199 from proposition [ prop : secant ] usually does not match fenchel s upper bound @xmath200 . for instance , consider the carathodory orbitope @xmath50 in example [ ex : hankelsmall ] . its algebraic boundary @xmath201 equals the second secant variety of the orbit @xmath15 , so proposition [ prop : secant ] implies @xmath202 . this orbitope satisfies @xmath203 but @xmath204 . for which orbitopes @xmath205 is the boundary @xmath206 one of the secant varieties of @xmath15 ? when is the lower bound on the carathodory number @xmath207 in proposition [ prop : secant ] tight ? a fundamental object in convex optimization is the set @xmath208 of positive semidefinite symmetric real @xmath17-matrices . this is the closed basic semi - algebraic cone defined by the non - negativity of the @xmath209 principal minors . it can also be described by only @xmath55 polynomial inequalities , namely , by requiring that the elementary symmetric polynomials in the eigenvalues , i.e. the suitably normalized coefficients of the characteristic polynomial , be non - negative . the algebraic boundary @xmath210 of the cone @xmath208 is the symmetric @xmath17-determinant . all faces of @xmath208 are exposed , isomorphic to @xmath211 for @xmath212 , and indexed by the lattice of linear subspaces ordered by reverse inclusion . spectrahedra inherit these favorable properties . recall that a _ spectrahedron _ is the intersection of the cone @xmath208 with an affine - linear subspace in @xmath213 . if we know that an orbitope is a spectrahedron then this either answers or simplifies many of our questions . [ ques : isspec1 ] characterize all @xmath214-orbitopes that are spectrahedra . polytopes are special cases of spectrahedra : they arise when the affine - linear space consists of diagonal matrices . one major distinction between polytopes and spectrahedra is that the class of spectrahedra is not closed under projection . that is , the image of a spectrahedron under a linear map is typically not a spectrahedron . see section 5 for orbitopal examples . characterizing projections of spectrahedra among all convex bodies is a major open problem in optimization theory ; see e.g. @xcite . here is a special case of this general problem : [ ques : isspec2 ] is every orbitope the linear projection of a spectrahedron ? in questions [ ques : isspec1 ] and [ ques : isspec2 ] , it is important to keep track of the subfield of @xmath91 over which the data @xmath172 are defined . frequently , this subfield is the rational numbers @xmath178 , and in this case we seek to write the orbitope as a ( projected ) spectrahedron over @xmath178 and not just over @xmath91 . semidefinite programming is the problem of maximizing a linear function over a ( projected ) spectrahedron , and there are efficient numerical algorithms for solving this problem in practice . in our context of orbitopes , the optimization problem can be phrased as follows : what method can be used for maximizing a linear function @xmath215 over an orbitope @xmath51 ? equivalently , how to evaluate the norm @xmath216 associated with the coorbitope @xmath156 ? this is equivalent to a non - linear optimization problem over the compact group @xmath2 . we seek to find @xmath34 which maximizes @xmath217 . this maximum is an algebraic function of @xmath47 . in this section we study two families of orbitopes for the orthogonal group @xmath218 . this group acts on the lie algebra @xmath219 by restricting the adjoint representation of @xmath27 . the @xmath1-module @xmath220 decomposes into two distinguished invariant subspaces , namely @xmath221 and @xmath222 . these correspond to the normal and tangent space of @xmath223 at the identity . in matrix terms , the spaces of symmetric and skew - symmetric matrices form two natural representations of @xmath1 for the action @xmath224 with @xmath225 and @xmath226 . for a symmetric matrix @xmath227 we define the _ symmetric schur - horn orbitope _ @xmath228 we shall see that these orbitopes are intimately related to certain polytopes which govern their boundary structure and spectrahedral representation . this connection arises via the classical schur - horn theorem @xcite . the material in the sections below could also be presented in symplectic language , using the moment maps of atiyah - guillemin - sternberg @xcite . the @xmath229-dimensional space @xmath221 decomposes into the trivial @xmath1-representation , given by multiples of the identity matrix , and the irreducible representation of symmetric @xmath17-matrices with trace zero . every symmetric matrix @xmath227 is orthogonally diagonalizable over @xmath91 . the ordered list of eigenvalues of @xmath230 is denoted @xmath231 . the orbit @xmath232 equals the set of matrices @xmath233 that satisfy @xmath234 . we shall see that its convex hull @xmath235 is the set of matrices @xmath233 for which @xmath236 is majorized by @xmath237 . for @xmath238 we say that @xmath239 is _ majorized _ by @xmath133 , written @xmath240 , if @xmath241 , and , after reordering , @xmath242 and @xmath243 , we have @xmath244 for a fixed point @xmath245 , the set of all points @xmath239 majorized by @xmath133 is the convex polytope @xmath246 here @xmath247 denotes the symmetric group , and @xmath248 is the _ permutahedron _ with respect to @xmath133 . this is a well - studied polytope @xcite and is itself an orbitope for @xmath247 . the permutahedron @xmath248 for @xmath249 consists of all points @xmath250 such that @xmath251 and @xmath252$.}\ ] ] let @xmath253 be the linear projection onto the diagonal . let @xmath227 and @xmath254 its symmetric schur - horn orbitope . then the diagonal @xmath255 is majorized by the vector of eigenvalues @xmath237 . in fact , the orbitope @xmath254 maps linearly onto the permutahedron : @xmath256 [ cor : sh1 ] the schur - horn orbitope equals @xmath257 . we have shown that the right hand side equals @xmath258 . we claim that a matrix @xmath259 is in this set if and only if @xmath259 lies in @xmath260 . this is clear if @xmath259 is a diagonal matrix . it follows for all matrices since both sets are invariant under the @xmath1-action . our next goal is to derive a spectrahedral characterization of @xmath254 . consider the natural action of the lie group @xmath27 on the @xmath114-th exterior power @xmath261 . if @xmath262 is any basis of @xmath24 , then the induced basis vectors of @xmath261 are @xmath263 for @xmath264 . a matrix @xmath265 acts on a basis element by sending it to @xmath266 . we denote by @xmath267 the induced map of lie algebras . the linear map @xmath268 is defined by the rule @xmath269 the @xmath270-matrix that represents @xmath271 in the standard basis of @xmath261 is known as the _ @xmath114-th additive compound matrix _ of the @xmath272-matrix @xmath273 . it has the following main property : [ lem : compoundeigen ] let @xmath274 with eigenvalues @xmath275 . then @xmath271 is symmetric and has eigenvalues @xmath276 for @xmath264 . let @xmath277 be an eigenbasis for @xmath273 . then the formula ( [ eq : addcomprule ] ) says @xmath278 hence @xmath279 is an eigenvector of @xmath271 with eigenvalue @xmath280 . this leads to the result that each symmetric schur - horn orbitope @xmath254 is a spectrahedron . [ thm : symspec ] let @xmath227 with ordered eigenvalues @xmath281 . then @xmath282 a matrix @xmath233 is in @xmath254 if and only if @xmath236 is in the permutahedron @xmath283 . from the inequality representation in ( [ eq : permineq ] ) , in conjunction with lemma [ lem : compoundeigen ] , we see that this is the case if and only if the largest eigenvalue of @xmath284 is at most @xmath285 . we shall now derive the description of all faces of the schur - horn orbitope @xmath254 . since @xmath254 is a spectrahedron , by theorem [ thm : symspec ] , we know that all of its faces are exposed faces . hence a face of @xmath254 is the set of points maximizing a linear function @xmath286 . the canonical @xmath1-invariant inner product on @xmath221 is given by @xmath287 and , by identifying spaces , a linear function may be written as @xmath288 . note that the dual space @xmath289 is equipped with the contragredient action , that is , @xmath290 . [ thm : facelatticesh ] every @xmath1-orbit of faces of @xmath254 intersects the pullback of a unique @xmath247-orbit of faces of the permutahedron @xmath283 . in particular , the faces of @xmath254 are products of symmetric schur - horn orbitopes of smaller dimensions corresponding to flags in @xmath24 . let @xmath150 be a face of @xmath254 and let @xmath291 be a linear function maximized at @xmath150 . then the face @xmath292 is given by @xmath293 and we may identify @xmath294 with the orbit @xmath295 . since @xmath273 is orthogonally diagonalizable , the orbit @xmath295 contains the diagonal matrices @xmath296 for @xmath297 . the corresponding faces are the pullbacks of the orbit of faces of @xmath283 given by the linear function @xmath298 . faces of the permutahedron correspond to flags of coordinate subspaces , and @xmath1 translates these to arbitrary flags of subspaces . facets of the permutahedron @xmath248 correspond to coordinate subspaces . replacing these with arbitrary subspaces yields supporting hyperplanes for the schur - horn orbitope @xmath254 . [ cor : sh2 ] the schur - horn orbitope @xmath299 is the set of matrices @xmath233 such that @xmath300 the following three examples show how theorem [ thm : facelatticesh ] translates into explicit face lattices . [ ex : freespec ] let @xmath301 be the diagonal matrix with diagonal @xmath302 . the orbitope @xmath260 is the convex hull of all symmetric rank @xmath70 matrices with trace @xmath70 , and hence @xmath303 . this orbitope plays the role of a `` simplex among spectrahedra '' because every compact spectrahedron is an affine section . the face @xmath304 of the orbitope @xmath254 in direction @xmath274 is isomorphic to @xmath305 where @xmath306 is the unit sphere and @xmath307 is the eigenspace of @xmath273 with maximal eigenvalue . thus , @xmath308 is isomorphic to a lower dimensional schur - horn orbitope for a rank one matrix . we conclude that the face lattice of @xmath254 consists of the linear subspaces of @xmath24 ordered by inclusion . this fact is well known ; see @xcite . the dimension of a face corresponding to a @xmath114-subspace is @xmath309 . the projection @xmath310 is the standard @xmath311-dimensional simplex @xmath312 whose faces correspond to the coordinate subspaces . we now describe continuous analogs to hypersimplices , extending the simplices in example [ ex : freespec ] . fix @xmath313 and let @xmath314 be the diagonal matrix with @xmath114 ones and @xmath315 zeros . the orbitope @xmath316 of the _ @xmath317-spectrahedral hypersimplex _ , as its diagonal projection @xmath318 is the classical @xmath317-hypersimplex ; cf . * example 0.11 ) . for instance , if @xmath68 and @xmath319 then @xmath299 is nine - dimensional and @xmath320 is an octahedron . up to @xmath321-symmetry , the octahedron has one orbit of vertices and edges but two orbits of triangles . the pullback of any edge is a circle , and the pullbacks of the triangles are five - dimensional symmetric schur - horn orbitopes @xmath322 for @xmath323 and @xmath324 . both facets are isomorphic to free spectrahedra . let @xmath227 be a symmetric matrix with distinct eigenvalues , e.g. @xmath325 . the image of @xmath254 under the diagonal map is the classical permutahedron @xmath326 . its face lattice may be described as the collection of all flags of coordinate subspaces in @xmath24 ordered by refinement . we may associate to every @xmath274 the complete flag whose @xmath114-th subspace is the direct sum of the eigenspaces of the first @xmath114 largest eigenvalues . thus , @xmath327 may be identified with the complete flag variety over @xmath91 . as for the facial structure , the face @xmath308 is isomorphic to the convex hull of the orbit @xmath328 . here , the stabilizer decomposes into a product of groups isomorphic to @xmath329 where @xmath330 is the dimension of the @xmath97-th eigenspace of @xmath273 . hence , the face @xmath308 is isomorphic to a cartesian product of generic schur - horn orbitopes and is of dimension @xmath331 . the face only depends on the flag associated to @xmath273 . this implies that the face lattice of @xmath299 is isomorphic to the set of partial flags ordered by refinement . again , in every orbit of flags there is a flag consisting only of coordinate subspaces . these special flags form the face lattice of the standard permutahedron @xmath332 . we regard @xmath299 as a continuous analog of the permutahedron . we conclude this subsection with a discussion of the algebraic boundary @xmath333 of the schur - horn orbitope . let @xmath334 be the smallest subfield of @xmath91 that contains the eigenvalues @xmath335 , and suppose that the @xmath336 are sufficiently general . then the hypersurface @xmath333 is defined in the affine space @xmath337 by the following polynomial of degree @xmath338 in @xmath229 unknowns over the field @xmath334 : @xmath339 however , from a computer algebra perspective , this is not what we want . assuming that @xmath340 has entries in @xmath178 , we prefer not to pass to the field extension @xmath334 , but we want the algebraic boundary @xmath333 to be the @xmath178-zariski closure of the above hypersurface @xmath341 . for instance , suppose that the characteristic polynomial of @xmath340 is irreducible over @xmath178 . then we must take the product of @xmath342 over all permutations of the eigenvalues @xmath335 , and the polynomial @xmath343 that defines @xmath333 over @xmath178 is the reduced part of that product . it equals @xmath344 where @xmath345 denotes the _ tensor sum _ of two square matrices of the same size ( see e.g. @xcite ) . here the product goes only up to @xmath346 because the matrices @xmath259 and @xmath340 have the same trace . for special matrices @xmath340 , the characteristic polynomial may factor over @xmath178 , and in this case the algebraic boundary @xmath333 is cut out by a factor of the polynomial @xmath342 or @xmath343 . the space @xmath222 consists of skew - symmetric @xmath17-matrices @xmath347 . the eigenvalues of @xmath347 are purely imaginary , say @xmath348 , where @xmath349 , with @xmath350 and an additional @xmath146 eigenvalue if @xmath55 is odd . thus @xmath347 is not diagonalizable over @xmath91 , but the adjoint @xmath1-action brings the matrix @xmath347 into the normal form @xmath351 here @xmath352 is a suitable matrix in @xmath353 , @xmath354 is the diagonal matrix with diagonal @xmath355 , and we denote @xmath356 . let @xmath357 be the linear map such that @xmath358 if @xmath347 is in normal form as above , then @xmath359 . we call @xmath360 the _ skew - diagonal _ of @xmath347 . in analogy to the symmetric case , the set @xmath361 of all skew - diagonals arising from @xmath299 is nicely behaved ; in fact , the necessary changes are rather modest . for a point @xmath362 we denote by @xmath363 the vector of absolute values . for @xmath364 let @xmath365 be the set of points @xmath362 such that @xmath366 is _ weakly majorized _ by @xmath367 . this means that @xmath367 and @xmath366 satisfy the majorization conditions except that @xmath368 is allowed . the polytope @xmath369 is the _ @xmath370-permutahedron_. it is the convex hull of the orbit of @xmath133 under the action of the coxeter group @xmath370 , the group of all @xmath371 signed permutations . the @xmath370-permutahedron @xmath365 for @xmath372 consists of all points @xmath362 with @xmath373 $ with $ i \cap j = \emptyset$.}\ ] ] as expected , we have the following analog of the symmetric schur - horn theorem . let @xmath374 with @xmath375 and @xmath376 the skew - symmetric schur - horn orbitope of @xmath347 . then @xmath377 is weakly majorized by @xmath378 . in particular , we have @xmath379 . the same arguments as in the symmetric case yield the following results . [ thm : facelatticeskewsh ] every @xmath1 orbit of faces of the skew - symmetric schur - horn orbitope @xmath376 contains the pullback of a unique @xmath370-orbit of faces of the @xmath370-permutahedron @xmath380 . the skew - symmetric schur - horn orbitope @xmath376 coincides with the set of skew - symmetric matrices @xmath259 such that @xmath381 is weakly majorized by @xmath377 . fix @xmath382 and @xmath383 , and @xmath384 . then the system ( [ eq : bpermineq ] ) consists of @xmath385 linear inequalities , namely , six inequalities @xmath386 , twelve inequalities @xmath387 , and eight inequalities @xmath388 . their solution set is the @xmath389-permutahedron @xmath390 , commonly known as the _ truncated cuboctahedron _ , and it has @xmath391 vertices , @xmath392 edges and @xmath385 facets ( six octagons , twelve squares and eight hexagons ) . a picture is shown in figure [ f : b3permuta ] . @xmath393{figures / bpermut}\ ] ] -0.3 cm let @xmath347 denote a general skew - symmetric @xmath394-matrix . theorem [ thm : facelatticeskewsh ] implies that the facets of the @xmath21-dimensional orbitope @xmath376 come in three families , corresponding to @xmath395-orbits of the octagons , squares , and hexagons in figure [ f : b3permuta ] . the facets arising from the octagons are skew - symmetric schur - horn orbitopes for @xmath69 with skew - diagonal @xmath396 and therefore have dimension six . the facets arising from the squares are the product of a line segment and a disc , coming from @xmath397 with @xmath398 acting by the determinant . the facets arising from the hexagons are @xmath399-orbitopes isomorphic to symmetric schur - horn orbitopes with eigenvalues @xmath400 and therefore have dimension five . we next present a spectrahedral description of an arbitrary skew - symmetric schur - horn orbitope @xmath376 . to derive this , we return to symmetric matrices and their real eigenvalues . let @xmath374 be a matrix with eigenvalues @xmath401 and let @xmath402 then @xmath403 has eigenvalues @xmath404 . for any @xmath405 , the additive compound matrix @xmath406 has largest eigenvalue @xmath407 . we conclude that each skew - symmetric skew - horn orbitope @xmath380 is a spectrahedron : [ thm : skewsymspec ] let @xmath374 with @xmath408 . then @xmath409 from this theorem we can derive a description of the algebraic boundary as before , and again the issue arises that the @xmath410 lie in an extension @xmath334 over the field of definition of @xmath347 , which will usually be @xmath178 . at present we do not know whether theorems [ thm : symspec ] and [ thm : skewsymspec ] can be extended to obtain spectrahedral representations of the respective orbitopes over @xmath178 . we close this section with one more example of a skew - symmetric schur - horn orbitope . consider the skew - symmetric schur - horn orbitope @xmath376 for some @xmath411 with @xmath412 . according to theorem [ thm : skewsymspec ] , a spectrahedral representation is @xmath413 the projection @xmath361 to the skew diagonal is the _ crosspolytope _ @xmath414 . this a regular polytope with symmetry group @xmath370 , and it has only one orbit of faces in each dimension . the orbitope @xmath376 is the @xmath26 instance of the _ grassmann orbitope _ @xmath415 . these are important in the theory of calibrated manifolds , and we shall study them in section 7 . we argued in section [ sec : setup ] that , given a compact group @xmath2 acting algebraically on @xmath416 , we can identify @xmath2 with a subgroup of @xmath1 , or even of @xmath0 when @xmath2 is connected . the ambient space @xmath417 is itself an @xmath418-dimensional real representation of the group @xmath2 . the action of @xmath2 on @xmath419 is by left multiplication . the orbit of the identity matrix @xmath420 under this action is the group @xmath2 itself . we call the corresponding orbitope @xmath421 the _ tautological orbitope _ for the pair @xmath422 . this orbitope lives in @xmath423 , and it serves as an initial object because it maps linearly to every orbitope @xmath52 in @xmath32 . tautological orbitopes of finite permutation groups have been studied under the name of _ permutation polytopes _ ( see @xcite ) . the most famous of them all is the _ birkhoff polytope _ for @xmath424 , which was studied for other coxeter groups by mccarthy , ogilvie , zobin , and zobin @xcite . in this section we investigate the tautological orbitopes for the full groups @xmath1 and @xmath0 . similar to the schur - horn orbitopes in section [ sec : schurhorn ] , the facial structure is governed by polytopes arising from the projection onto the diagonal . we begin with the example @xmath425 . the group @xmath60 of @xmath426 rotation matrices has dimension three . its tautological orbitope is a convex body of dimension nine . the following spectrahedral representation was suggested to us by pablo parrilo . [ prop : pabloso3 ] the tautological orbitope @xmath427 is a spectrahedron whose boundary is a quartic hypersurface . in fact , a @xmath426-matrix @xmath428 lies in @xmath427 if and only if @xmath429 we first claim that @xmath427 coincides with the set of all @xmath426-matrices @xmath430 where @xmath431 runs over all positive semidefinite @xmath432-matrices having trace @xmath70 . positive semidefinite @xmath432-matrices with both trace @xmath70 and rank @xmath70 are of the form @xmath433 their convex hull is the free spectrahedron of example [ ex : freespec ] . the image of the above rank @xmath70 matrices @xmath434 under the linear map ( [ eq : pablosu2 ] ) is precisely the group @xmath60 . this parametrization is known as the _ cayley transform_. geometrically , it corresponds to the double cover @xmath435 . the claim follows because the linear map commutes with taking the convex hull . the symmetric @xmath432-matrices @xmath431 with @xmath436 form a nine - dimensional affine space , and this space is isomorphic to the nine - dimensional space of all @xmath426-matrices @xmath428 under the linear map given in . we can express each @xmath437 in terms of the @xmath438 by inverting the linear relations @xmath439 , @xmath440 , etc . the resulting symmetric @xmath432-matrix @xmath441 is precisely the matrix in the statement of proposition [ prop : pabloso3 ] . the ideal of the group @xmath399 is generated by the entries of the @xmath426-matrix @xmath442 , while the prime ideal of @xmath60 is that same ideal plus @xmath443 . we can check that the prime ideal of @xmath60 coincides with the ideal generated by the @xmath444-minors of the matrix . thus the group @xmath60 is recovered as the set of matrices of rank one . proposition [ prop : pabloso3 ] implies that @xmath427 is affinely isomorphic to the free spectrahedron for @xmath68 , that is , to the set of positive semidefinite @xmath432-matrices with trace equal to @xmath70 . this implies a characterization of all faces of the tautological orbitope for @xmath60 . first , all faces are exposed because @xmath427 is a spectrahedron . all of its proper faces are free spectrahedra , for @xmath445 , so they have dimensions @xmath146 , @xmath14 and @xmath446 , as seen in example [ ex : freespec ] . we now examine @xmath447 . as before , let @xmath448 denote the projection of the @xmath17-matrices onto their diagonals . [ lem : ontodiagonal ] the projection @xmath449 of the tautological orbitope for the orthogonal group @xmath1 to its diagonal is precisely the @xmath55-dimensional cube @xmath450^n$ ] . the columns of a matrix @xmath451 are unit vectors . thus every coordinate @xmath452 in bounded by @xmath70 in absolute value and @xmath449 is a subset of the cube . for the reverse inclusion , note that all @xmath453 diagonal matrices with entries @xmath454 are orthogonal matrices . the cube @xmath455^n$ ] is the special @xmath456-permutahedron @xmath457 . as with schur - horn orbitopes , the projection onto this polytope reveals the facial structure . as general endomorphisms are not normal , the key concept of diagonalizability is replaced by that of _ singular value decomposition_. recall that for any linear map @xmath226 there are orthogonal transformations @xmath458 such that @xmath459 is diagonal with entries @xmath460 . these entries are the _ singular values _ of @xmath259 . we shall see in ( [ eq : onspec ] ) that @xmath461 is a spectrahedron , hence all of its faces are exposed faces . the following result recursively characterizes all faces of this tautological orbitope . [ thm : tautoon ] let @xmath462 be a linear function on @xmath18 with @xmath463 . then the face of @xmath461 in direction @xmath215 is isomorphic to @xmath464 where @xmath465 . let @xmath466 be a linear function with @xmath467 , so that @xmath468 . we fix a singular value decomposition @xmath469 of the matrix @xmath273 . here @xmath470 is a diagonal matrix @xmath17 with its first @xmath471 entries positive and remaining @xmath472 entries zero . this matrix also defines a linear function @xmath473 on @xmath18 . cyclic invariance of the trace ensures that the faces @xmath474 and @xmath475 are isomorphic . the subset of @xmath1 at which @xmath476 is maximized is the subgroup @xmath477 . the convex hull of this subgroup equals @xmath475 . it coincides with the tautological orbitope for @xmath478 . we interpret theorem [ thm : tautoon ] geometrically as saying that the tautological orbitope for @xmath1 is a continuous analog of the @xmath55-dimensional cube . every face of the cube is a smaller dimensional cube and the dimension of a face maximizing a linear functional @xmath215 is determined by the support of @xmath215 . the role of the support is now played by the rank of the matrix @xmath273 . this behavior yields information about the carathodory number of the tautological orbitope . the carathodory number of the orbitope @xmath479 is at most @xmath480 . by ( * ? * lemma 3.2 ) , the carathodory number of a convex body @xmath137 is bounded via @xmath481 since every proper face is isomorphic to @xmath482 for some @xmath483 the result follows by induction on @xmath55 . the base case is @xmath484 for which @xmath485 is a @xmath70-simplex . note that the orbit @xmath486 coincides with the orbit of the identity matrix @xmath420 under the action of the product group @xmath487 by both right and left multiplication . hence the tautological orbitope @xmath461 is also an @xmath487-orbitope for that action . we shall now digress and study these orbitopes in general . after we have seen ( in theorem [ thm : ononspec ] ) that these are spectrahedra , we shall resume our discussion of @xmath461 . the group @xmath488 acts on @xmath18 by simultaneous left and right translation . the action is given , for @xmath489 and @xmath226 , by @xmath490 ky fan proved in @xcite that the schur - horn theorem for symmetric matrices under conjugation by @xmath1 generalizes to arbitrary square matrices under this @xmath491 action . now , singular values play the role of the eigenvalues . the following is a convex geometric reformulation : [ lem : fan ] for a square matrix @xmath226 let @xmath492 denote its orbitope under the action ( [ eq : fanact ] ) of the group @xmath493 . then the image @xmath494 of the projection to the diagonal is the @xmath456-permutahedron with respect to the singular values @xmath495 . we shall refer to @xmath496 as the _ fan orbitope _ of the matrix @xmath259 . from lemma [ lem : fan ] , one easily deduces the analogous results to theorems [ thm : facelatticesh ] and [ thm : facelatticeskewsh ] . the facial structure of the fan orbitope @xmath492 is determined by the facial structure of the @xmath456-permutahedron @xmath497 specified by the singular values of the matrix @xmath259 . the description of the @xmath456-permutahedron in terms of weak majorization was stated in . rephrasing these same linear inequalities for the singular values , and using lemma [ lem : fan ] , now leads to a spectrahedral description of the fan orbitopes . for that we make use of the alternative characterization of singular values as the square roots of the ( non - negative ) eigenvalues of @xmath498 . using schur complements , it can be seen that the @xmath499-matrix @xmath500 has the eigenvalues @xmath501 . we form its additive compound matrices as before . [ thm : ononspec ] let @xmath259 be a real @xmath17-matrix with singular values @xmath502 . then its fan orbitope @xmath492 equals the spectrahedron @xmath503 fix an integer @xmath504 . the _ ky fan @xmath133-norm _ is defined by @xmath505 this function is indeed a norm on @xmath18 , and its unit ball is the fan orbitope @xmath492 where @xmath259 is the diagonal matrix with @xmath133 diagonal entries @xmath506 and @xmath507 diagonal entries @xmath146 . theorem [ thm : ononspec ] shows that the unit ball in the ky fan @xmath133-norm is a spectrahedron . two norms of special interest in applied linear algebra are the _ operator norm _ @xmath508 and the _ nuclear norm _ @xmath509 . indeed , these two norms played the key role in work of fazel , recht and parrilo @xcite on compressed sensing in the matrix setting . both the operator norm and the nuclear norm are closely tied to their vector counterparts . the unit balls in the operator and nuclear norm are both fan orbitopes . the projection to the diagonal yields the unit balls for the @xmath510 and the @xmath511-norm on @xmath24 . these two unit balls are polytopes in @xmath24 , namely , the @xmath55-cube and the @xmath55-crosspolytope respectively . fazel _ et al . _ showed in ( * ? ? ? 2.1 ) that the nuclear norm ball has the structure of a spectrahedron , and semidefinite programming duality allows for linear optimization over the operator norm ball . the spectrahedral descriptions of both unit balls in @xmath18 are special instances of theorem [ thm : ononspec ] , to be stated explicitly once more . the operator norm ball consists of all matrices @xmath190 whose largest singular value is at most @xmath70 . this is equivalent to @xmath512 the nuclear norm ball consists of all matrices @xmath190 for which the sum of the singular values is at most @xmath70 . this is equivalent to saying that the sum of the largest @xmath55 eigenvalues of the symmetric @xmath513 matrix @xmath514 is at most @xmath70 . hence the nuclear norm ball in @xmath18 is the spectrahedron defined by the linear matrix inequality @xmath515 we are now finally prepared to return to the main aim of this section , which is the study of tautological orbitopes . the proof of theorem [ thm : tautoon ] implies that the convex hull of @xmath1 equals the set of @xmath516-matrices whose largest singular value is at most @xmath70 . in other words : the operator norm ball in @xmath18 is equal to the tautological orbitope of the orthogonal group @xmath1 . the coorbitope @xmath517 is the nuclear norm ball . both of these convex bodies are spectrahedra . they are characterized in ( [ eq : onspec ] ) and ( [ eq : onspec2 ] ) respectively . it would be worthwhile to explore implications of our geometric explorations of orbitopes for algorithmic applications in the sciences and engineering , such as those proposed in @xcite . we next discuss the faces of the tautological orbitope of the group @xmath0 . the relevant convex polytope is now the convex hull @xmath518 of all vertices @xmath519 with an even number of @xmath520-entries . this polytope is known as the _ demicube _ or _ halfcube_. it is a permutahedron for the coxeter group of type @xmath521 , i.e. signed permutations with an even number of sign changes . the facet hyperplanes of @xmath518 are derived by separating infeasible vertices of @xmath455^n$ ] by hyperplanes through the @xmath55 neighboring vertices : @xmath522^n \,:\ , \sum_{i \not\in j } x_i - \sum_{i \in j } x_i \le n-2 \,\,\,\ , \hbox{for all $ j \subseteq [ n]$ of odd cardinality } \bigr\}.\ ] ] while @xmath523 is only a line segment , we have @xmath524 for @xmath525 . for example , the halfcube @xmath526 is the tetrahedron with vertices @xmath527 , @xmath528 , @xmath529 and @xmath530 . note that its facet inequalities appear as the diagonal entries in the symmetric @xmath432-matrix ( [ eq : magic ] ) : @xmath531 this observation is explained by results of horn ( cf . @xcite ) on the diagonals of special orthogonal matrices . these imply the following lemma about the tautological orbitope of @xmath0 : the projection of @xmath532 onto the diagonal equals the halfcube @xmath518 . just like in lemma [ lem : ontodiagonal ] , it is clear that @xmath518 is a subset of @xmath533 . the converse is derived from the linear algebra fact that the trace of any matrix in @xmath534 is at most @xmath535 . for @xmath536 $ ] let @xmath537 be the diagonal matrix with @xmath538 if @xmath539 and @xmath540 if @xmath541 . let @xmath542 . then @xmath543 for all @xmath544 of odd cardinality . this means that @xmath545 satisfies the linear inequalities in ( [ eq : sonfacets ] ) and hence lies in @xmath518 . there is a variant of singular value decomposition with respect to the restricted class of orientation preserving transformations . for every matrix @xmath226 there exist rotations @xmath546 such that @xmath547 is diagonal . the diagonal entries are called the _ special singular values _ and denoted by @xmath548 . the main difference to the usual singular values is that @xmath549 may be negative ; only the first @xmath550 entries of @xmath551 are non - negative . we need to make this distinction in order to understand the faces of @xmath552 . [ thm : sontauto ] the tautological orbitope of @xmath0 has precisely two orbits of facets . these are the tautological orbitopes for @xmath553 and the free spectrahedra of dimension @xmath554 . up to @xmath521-symmetry , the halfcube @xmath518 has only two distinct facets , namely an @xmath311-dimensional halfcube and an @xmath311-dimensional simplex . a typical halfcube facet @xmath555 arises by maximizing the linear function @xmath556 over @xmath518 , and a typical simplex facet @xmath557 arises by maximizing the linear function @xmath558 . pulling back @xmath215 along the diagonal projection @xmath559 , we see that the facet of @xmath552 corresponding to the halfcube facet is the convex hull of all rotations @xmath542 that fix the first standard basis vector @xmath560 . pulling back @xmath476 along @xmath559 , we see that the facet of @xmath552 corresponding to the simplex facet is the convex hull of @xmath561 . this facet is isomorphic to the convex hull of all @xmath562 such that @xmath563 . since @xmath564 is orientation reversing , one eigenvalue of @xmath564 is @xmath565 , and @xmath566 forces all other eigenvalues to be equal to @xmath70 . hence the facet in question is the symmetric schur - horn orbitope for the diagonal matrix @xmath567 . example [ ex : freespec ] implies that this is a free spectrahedron . in subsection 4.1 we exhibited a spectrahedral representation for the tautological orbitope @xmath427 , and in that case , the two facet types of theorem [ thm : sontauto ] collapse into one type . at present , we do not know how to generalize the representation ( [ eq : magic ] ) to @xmath0 for @xmath568 . orbitopes for @xmath19 were first studied by carathodory @xcite . the coorbitope cone ( [ eq : coorbitopecone ] ) dual to such a _ carathodory orbitope _ consists of non - negative trigonometric polynomials . this leads to the toeplitz spectrahedral representation of the universal carathodory orbitope in theorem [ th : toeplitz ] , which implies that the convex hulls of all trigonometric curves are projections of spectrahedra . the universal carathodory orbitope is also affinely isomorphic to the convex hull of the compact even moment curve , whose coorbitope cone consists of non - negative univariate polynomials . this leads to the representation by hankel matrices in theorem [ th : hankel ] . the irreducible representations @xmath569 of @xmath19 are indexed by non - negative integers @xmath123 . here , @xmath570 is the trivial representation . when @xmath571 is positive , the representation @xmath569 of @xmath19 acts on @xmath63 , and it sends a rotation matrix to its @xmath123th power : @xmath572 for a vector @xmath573 we consider the direct sum of these representations @xmath574 the _ carathodory orbitope _ @xmath575 is the convex hull of the orbit @xmath576 under the action @xmath577 on the vector space @xmath578 . this orbit is the _ trigonometric moment curve _ @xmath579 this curve is also identified with the matrix group @xmath580 lying in the space @xmath581 of block - diagonal @xmath582-matrices with @xmath23 blocks of size @xmath583 . thus @xmath575 is isomorphic to the convex hull of @xmath580 , and can therefore also be thought of as a tautological orbitope . we distinguish between isomorphisms of orbitopes that preserve the @xmath19-action , and the weaker notion of affine isomorphisms that preserve their structure as convex bodies . [ l : all_cara ] any orbitope of the circle group @xmath19 is isomorphic to a carathodory orbitope @xmath575 , where @xmath584 has distinct coordinates , and it is affinely isomorphic to a carathodory orbitope where the coordinates of @xmath259 are relatively prime integers . let @xmath51 be an orbitope for @xmath19 . we may assume that its ambient @xmath19-module @xmath32 has no trivial components and is the linear span of @xmath51 . then @xmath32 has the form @xmath577 for @xmath585 with distinct non - zero components , that is , @xmath32 is multiplicity free . this is because @xmath586 , where we identify @xmath63 with @xmath92 and @xmath19 with the unit circle in @xmath92 . the orbitope @xmath51 is generated by a vector @xmath587 with non - zero coordinates . by complex rescaling , we may assume that @xmath588 , showing that @xmath51 is isomorphic to @xmath575 . lastly , if the coordinates of @xmath589 have greatest common divisor @xmath123 , then @xmath577 is the composition @xmath590 , where @xmath591 and @xmath51 is affinely isomorphic to an orbitope for the module @xmath592 . we henceforth assume that @xmath593 where the @xmath594 are relatively prime . when @xmath595 , carathodory @xcite studied the facial structure of @xmath575 . an even - dimensional cyclic polytope is the convex hull of finitely many points on carathodory s curve ( see @xcite ) . smilansky @xcite studied the four - dimensional carathodory orbitopes ( @xmath26 ) , and this was recently extended by barvinok and novik @xcite who studied @xmath596 . the corresponding curve ( [ caracurve ] ) is the _ symmetric moment curve _ which gives rise to a remarkable family of centrally symmetric polytopes with extremal face numbers . many questions remain about the facial structure of the barvinok - novik orbitopes @xmath596 . see @xcite for details . we now focus on the _ universal carathodory orbitope _ @xmath597 in @xmath598 . this convex body has the following spectrahedral representation in terms of hermitian toeplitz matrices . [ th : toeplitz ] the universal carathodory orbitope @xmath599 is isomorphic to the spectrahedron consisting of positive semidefinite hermitian toeplitz matrices with ones along the diagonal : @xmath600 we note that the complex spectrahedron ( [ toeplitz ] ) can be translated into a spectrahedron over @xmath91 as follows . consider a hermitian matrix @xmath601 where @xmath150 is real symmetric and @xmath2 is real skew - symmetric . the hermitian matrix @xmath602 is positive definite if and only if @xmath603 a _ trigonometric curve _ is any curve in @xmath24 that is parametrized by polynomials in the trigonometric functions sine and cosine , or equivalently , any curve that is the image under a linear map of the universal trigonometric moment curve where @xmath595 . the convex hull of any trigonometric curve is a projected spectrahedron . in particular , all carathodory orbitopes are projected spectrahedra . @xmath604{figures / trig_curve_1.eps } } \put(135,0){\includegraphics[height=120pt]{figures / trig_curve_2.eps } } \put(280,0){\includegraphics[height=120pt]{figures / trig_curve_3.eps } } \put ( 0,-17){$(\cos(\theta),\sin(\theta),\cos(2\theta))$ } \put(135,-17){$(\cos(2\theta),\sin(2\theta),\cos(\theta))$ } \put(280,-17){$(\cos(\theta),\sin(2\theta),\cos(3\theta))$ } \end{picture}\ ] ] -0.3 cm figure [ f : trig_curves ] shows the convex hulls of three trigonometric curves in @xmath66 . the left and middle convex bodies are each the intersection of two convex quadratic cylinders ( @xmath605 and @xmath606 for the former ; @xmath607 and @xmath608 for the latter ) and hence are spectrahedra . the rightmost convex body is visibly not a spectrahedron . its exposed points are @xmath609 for @xmath610 , and it has two algebraic families of one - dimensional facets . in addition , there are two two - dimensional facets , namely the equilateral triangles for @xmath611 and @xmath612 . the six edges of these two triangles are one - dimensional non - exposed faces , as there is no linear function which achieves its minimum on this body along these edges . also , exactly one vertex of each triangle at @xmath613 and @xmath614 is exposed . we conclude that this convex body is a projected spectrahedron but it is not a spectrahedron . the coorbitope cone dual to @xmath615 consists of all affine - linear functions that are non - negative on @xmath615 . these correspond to non - negative trigonometric polynomials : @xmath616 we identify each point @xmath617 in @xmath618 with the laurent polynomial @xmath619\ ] ] with @xmath620 , @xmath621 , @xmath349 , and @xmath622 . then @xmath623 and @xmath624 if and only if @xmath625 is non - negative on the unit circle @xmath153 of @xmath92 . roots of @xmath625 occur in pairs @xmath626 and those on @xmath153 have even multiplicity . choosing one root from each pair gives the factorization @xmath627 where @xmath628 $ ] has degree @xmath23 and the coefficient vectors of @xmath602 and @xmath629 are complex conjugate . this factorization is the classical fejr - riesz theorem . utilizing the monomial map @xmath630 with @xmath631 , this is equivalent to the following : a trigonometric polynomial @xmath632 is non - negative on the unit circle if and only if there is a non - zero vector @xmath633 such that @xmath634 a point @xmath635 belongs to the carathodory orbitope @xmath636 if and only if @xmath637 the sum on the left equals the hermitian inner product in @xmath638 of the coefficient vector @xmath639 of the polynomial @xmath632 and the vector @xmath640 with @xmath641 as in ( [ toeplitz ] ) . the formula ( [ circlesos2 ] ) expresses @xmath639 as the image of the hermitian matrix @xmath642 under some linear projection @xmath643 . if @xmath644 denotes the linear map dual to @xmath643 then @xmath645 is precisely the hermitian toeplitz matrix in ( [ toeplitz ] ) . we conclude that the sum in ( [ circlepairing ] ) equals @xmath646 thus the point @xmath647 represented by a hermitian toeplitz matrix @xmath190 lies in @xmath615 if and only if @xmath648 for all @xmath649 if and only if @xmath190 is positive semidefinite . the proof of theorem [ th : toeplitz ] elucidates the known results about the facial structure of @xmath615 . [ neighborly ] the universal carathodory orbitope @xmath650 is a neighborly simplicial convex body . its faces are in inclusion - preserving correspondence with sets of at most @xmath23 points on the circle . a laurent polynomial @xmath625 as in lies in the boundary of the coorbitope cone @xmath651 if and only if it is non - negative on the unit circle @xmath153 but not strictly positive . it supports the face of @xmath615 spanned by the points of the trigonometric moment curve corresponding to its zeros in @xmath153 . each zero has multiplicity at least @xmath14 , so there are at most @xmath23 such points , and conversely any subset of @xmath652 points supports a face . since any fewer than @xmath653 points on the curve are affinely independent and since all faces are exposed , these faces are simplices . corollary [ neighborly ] implies that the carathodory number @xmath654 equals @xmath655 , as no point in the interior of @xmath615 lies in the convex hull of @xmath23 points of the orbit , but @xmath654 is at most one more than the maximal carathodory number of a facet , by lemma 3.2 of @xcite . carathodory orbitopes are generally not spectrahedra because they can possess non - exposed faces . smilansky @xcite showed that if we write @xmath656 for a point on the trigonometric moment curve with weights @xmath70 and @xmath71 then the faces of @xmath657 are exactly the points @xmath658 of the orbit , the line segments @xmath659 , where @xmath660 , and the triangles @xmath661 in particular , each line segment @xmath662 is a non - exposed edge of @xmath657 . we conclude that the barvinok - novik orbitope @xmath657 is not a spectrahedron . the toeplitz representation ( [ toeplitz ] ) of the universal carathodory orbitope @xmath615 reveals complete algebraic information . for example , the algebraic boundary @xmath663 is the irreducible hypersurface of degree @xmath655 defined by the determinant of that @xmath664-matrix . the curve itself is the set of all positive definite hermitian toeplitz matrices of rank one . the @xmath583-minors of the matrix ( [ toeplitz ] ) generate the prime ideal @xmath665 of this rational curve . the union of the @xmath666-dimensional faces of @xmath615 is the set of positive definite hermitian toeplitz matrices of rank @xmath667 , as a point lies on a @xmath666-dimensional face if and only if it is the convex combination of @xmath667 points of the curve . the zariski closure of this stratum is the set of all rank @xmath667 hermitian toeplitz matrices which is defined by the vanishing of the @xmath668 minors of that matrix . this is also the @xmath667th secant variety of the carathodory curve . lastly , this rank stratification is a whitney stratification of the algebraic boundary . the derivation of the algebraic description of @xmath575 for arbitrary @xmath669 requires the process of elimination . for instance , the ideal @xmath670 of the trigonometric moment curve ( [ caracurve ] ) can be computed from the ideal of @xmath444-minors for @xmath671 by eliminating all unknowns @xmath672 with @xmath673 . the equation of the algebraic boundary @xmath674 is obtained by the same elimination applied to a certain ideal of larger minors of the toeplitz matrix ( [ toeplitz ] ) . we refer to recent work of vinzant @xcite for a detailed study of the edges of barvinok - novik orbitopes . an analysis of the algebraic boundary the orbitope @xmath675 can be found in @xcite . the cone over the degree @xmath23 moment curve is the image of @xmath63 in its @xmath23th symmetric power @xmath676 under the map @xmath677 this map is naturally @xmath19-equivariant . we define the _ compact moment curve _ to be the image @xmath678 of the unit circle under the map @xmath679 . this restricted map equals @xmath680 the convex hull of the curve @xmath678 is an orbitope . by lemma [ l : all_cara ] , it is isomorphic to some carathodory orbitope @xmath575 . the following lemma makes this identification explicit . [ l : identification ] if @xmath681 is odd , then @xmath682 is isomorphic to the barvinok - novik orbitope @xmath683 . if @xmath681 is even , then @xmath682 is isomorphic to @xmath684 , which is affinely isomorphic to the universal carathodory orbitope @xmath685 . complexifying the @xmath19-module @xmath577 where @xmath589 gives the @xmath686-module with symmetric weights @xmath687 . thus the underlying real @xmath19-module of this @xmath686-module is @xmath688 . the lemma follows because the complexified representation @xmath689 of @xmath690 has weights @xmath691 , and this representation is spanned by the pure powers of linear forms , so every weight appears in the linear span of the orbit . suppose now that @xmath692 is even . we describe the moment curve and the carathodory orbitope in coordinates @xmath693 for @xmath694 . fix the @xmath695-hankel matrix @xmath696 [ th : hankel ] the even moment curve consists of all vectors @xmath697 such that the hankel matrix @xmath698 has rank one , is positive semidefinite , and satisfies the linear equation @xmath699 its convex hull consists of all @xmath700 such that @xmath698 is positive semidefinite and satisfies . thus the carathodory orbitope @xmath701 has a second _ hankel representation _ as a spectrahedron . the proof of this theorem follows from the well - known fact that every non - negative polynomial in one variable is a sum of squares of polynomials . it uses the duality in @xcite . observe that the points of the even compact moment curve satisfy , which comes from the polynomial identity @xmath702 . as @xmath703 has just one copy of the trivial representation , this is the only affine equation that holds on @xmath704 . the dual to @xmath703 is the space @xmath705_{2n}$ ] of real homogeneous polynomials of degree @xmath706 in @xmath707 and @xmath708 . the coefficients of such a polynomial gives coordinates for @xmath705_{2n}$ ] . the coorbitope cone @xmath709 dual to the orbitope @xmath710 is the cone of homogeneous polynomials of degree @xmath706 that are non - negative on @xmath63 . thus a point @xmath711 lies in the orbitope @xmath710 if and only if it satisfies and @xmath712 for every non - negative polynomial @xmath713 . since non - negative homogeneous polynomials in @xmath707 and @xmath708 are sums of squares ( cf . @xcite ) , we only need these inequalities to hold when @xmath714 is a square . writing @xmath715 for the coefficient vector of the polynomial @xmath716 , the sum becomes @xmath717 where @xmath698 is the hankel matrix . this proves the theorem . the hankel representation of the universal carathodory orbitope arose by considering the image of the circle @xmath718 in @xmath703 and its relation to non - negative binary forms . generalizing from @xmath63 to @xmath719 gives the veronese orbitopes whose coorbitope cones ( [ eq : coorbitopecone ] ) consist of non - negative @xmath23-ary forms . when @xmath720 , non - negative forms are not necessarily sums of squares , except for quadratic forms and the exceptional case of ternary quartics . the set of decomposable symmetric tensors is the image of the veronese map @xmath721 the @xmath722-orbits through any two non - zero decomposable tensors are scalar multiples of each other and are thus isomorphic . we define the _ veronese orbitope _ @xmath723 to be the convex hull of the orbit through the specific decomposable tensor @xmath724 . that orbit is also the image @xmath725 of the unit @xmath726-sphere under the @xmath472-th veronese embedding of @xmath719 . suppose that @xmath727 is even . then the orbit @xmath725 can be identified with @xmath728 since @xmath729 is two - to - one with @xmath730 . the dual vector space to @xmath731 is the space of homogeneous forms of degree @xmath706 on @xmath719 . the only invariant forms are those proportional to the form @xmath732 , so both @xmath731 and its dual space contain one copy of the trivial representation , and @xmath733 lies in the hyperplane of @xmath731 defined by @xmath734 . the dual cone to the veronese orbitope @xmath735 is the cone of non - negative forms of degree @xmath706 in @xmath736 . see also ( * ? ? ? * example ( 1.2 ) ) . we write @xmath737 for the veronese coorbitope cone consisting of non - negative forms . the cone @xmath738 of non - negative forms contains the cone @xmath739 of sums of squares , but when @xmath720 , @xmath740 , and @xmath741 , hilbert @xcite showed that the inclusion is strict . we refer to @xcite for a recent study which compares the dimension of the faces of these cones . the cone @xmath739 is naturally a projection of the positive semidefinite cone . hence its dual cone @xmath742 is a spectrahedron : it can be realized as the intersection of the positive semidefinite cone with a certain linear space of generalized hankel matrices , discussed in detail in reznick s book @xcite . this spectrahedron @xmath743 is strictly larger than the veronese orbitope @xmath744 when @xmath720 , @xmath740 , and @xmath741 . in fact , @xmath744 is precisely the convex hull of the subset of extreme points in @xmath743 that have rank one . we present a detailed case study of the exceptional case of ternary quartics , when @xmath745 . the veronese orbitope @xmath746 is a @xmath747-dimensional convex body . let @xmath748 be the @xmath21-dimensional cone over the veronese orbitope @xmath749 . as all non - negative ternary quartics are sums of squares , we have the following identities of cones : @xmath750 we next present reznick s spectrahedral representation of @xmath749 . for this , we identify @xmath751 with its dual , and we introduce coordinates @xmath752 where the indices @xmath753 are the exponents of monomials in variables @xmath754 of degree @xmath755 . the ternary quartic corresponding to @xmath700 is @xmath756 where @xmath757 is the multinomial coefficient . the inner product @xmath758 is @xmath60-invariant . given a ternary quartic @xmath759 in the notation , we associate to it the following symmetric @xmath760-matrix with hankel structure as in ( * ? ? ? ( 5.25 ) ) : @xmath761 the veronese orbitope @xmath762 is a spectrahedron . it consists of all positive semidefinite hankel matrices @xmath763 as in @xmath764 that satisfy the equation @xmath765 it is shown in ( * ? ? ? 5 ) that the quartic @xmath759 is non - negative if and only if the hankel matrix @xmath763 is positive semidefinite . furthermore , the equation is the affine equation @xmath766 which defines the hyperplane containing the orbit @xmath767 . by contrast , the veronese coorbitope is not a spectrahedron . [ th : sos ] the convex cone of non - negative ternary quartics @xmath768 is not a spectrahedron . its facets have dimension twelve and the intersection of any two facets is an exposed face of dimension nine . it also has maximal non - exposed faces of dimension nine . we thank greg blekherman who explained this to us . the cone @xmath769 is full - dimensional in the @xmath21-dimensional space @xmath736 . its facets come from its defining linear inequalities @xmath770 for @xmath771 , let @xmath772 be the facet exposed by the inequality @xmath773 , which consists of those non - negative ternary quartics @xmath239 that vanish at @xmath133 . since the boundary of @xmath769 is @xmath747-dimensional and we have a two - dimensional family of isomorphic facets , we see that each facet @xmath772 is @xmath774-dimensional . a non - negative form that vanishes at @xmath771 must also have its two partial derivatives ( in local coordinates at @xmath133 ) vanish , which gives three linear conditions on the facet @xmath772 . concretely , if we take @xmath775 $ ] with local coordinates @xmath776 , then the constant and linear terms of the inhomogeneous quartic @xmath777 must vanish . consequently , @xmath778 where @xmath602 , @xmath779 , and @xmath780 are , respectively , the terms of degrees @xmath14 , @xmath71 , and @xmath755 in @xmath239 . these are binary forms . their @xmath781 coefficients parametrize the linear span of the facet @xmath772 , showing again that @xmath772 is 12-dimensional . the quadratic form @xmath782 is the hessian of @xmath777 at @xmath775 $ ] in these coordinates . a form @xmath239 lies in the relative interior of the facet @xmath772 if and only if , given any @xmath783 which vanishes at @xmath133 along with its partial derivatives , so that it lies in the linear span of @xmath772 , there is an @xmath784 such that @xmath785 also lies in @xmath772 . these conditions are equivalent to 1 . @xmath239 has no other zeros in @xmath786 , and 2 . the hessian of @xmath239 at @xmath133 is a positive definite quadratic form . a form @xmath787 lies in the boundary of @xmath772 when one of these conditions fails , that is , either 1 . @xmath239 vanishes at a second point @xmath788 , or 2 . the hessian of @xmath239 has a double root at some point @xmath789 . faces of type ( 1 ) have the form @xmath790 . these are nine - dimensional and occur in a four - dimensional family parametrized by pairs of distinct points in @xmath786 . the union of all such faces is a semialgebraic subset of dimension @xmath791 in the boundary of @xmath769 . faces of type ( 2 ) also have dimension nine . the condition that the hessian has a double root at a point @xmath792 gives two linear conditions on the coefficients of @xmath239 . there is an additional condition that the cubic part @xmath779 of @xmath239 in also vanishes at @xmath793 , for otherwise @xmath239 takes negative values along the line through @xmath133 corresponding to @xmath793 . a face of type ( 2 ) is the limit of faces @xmath790 of type ( 1 ) as @xmath794 approaches @xmath133 along the line corresponding to @xmath793 . these faces form a three - dimensional family on which @xmath60 acts faithfully and transitively . let us now examine the exposed faces of @xmath769 . let @xmath795 be a symmetric tensor in the dual cone to @xmath769 . then @xmath215 is the sum of decomposable symmetric tensors , @xmath796 and so it supports the face @xmath797 . thus the exposed faces of @xmath769 are intersections of facets , and they consist of non - negative ternary quartics that vanish at a given set of points . since the faces of type ( 2 ) are not of this form , they are not exposed . our next agenda item is a discussion of the algebraic boundaries of the convex bodies and cones discussed above . the algebraic boundary of the cone @xmath748 is characterized by the vanishing of the determinant of the hankel matrix @xmath763 in . from this we conclude : the algebraic boundary of the veronese orbitope @xmath749 is the variety of dimension @xmath798 and degree six which is defined by the linear equation and the hankel determinant @xmath799 . the extreme points of @xmath749 are precisely the hankel matrices @xmath763 of rank @xmath70 . we observed in the proof of theorem [ th : sos ] that the boundary of @xmath769 consists of non - negative quartics @xmath239 that vanish at some point @xmath133 of @xmath786 , and that the partial derivatives of @xmath239 necessarily also vanish at @xmath133 . that is , the plane quartic curve defined by @xmath800 is singular at @xmath133 . thus the algebraic boundary of @xmath769 consists of singular ternary quartics . working in @xmath801 , and its dual space of ternary quartics , this algebraic boundary is seen to be the dual variety to the veronese surface which consists of rank @xmath70 hankel matrices @xmath763 . [ cor : discrorbi ] the algebraic boundary of the coorbitope cone @xmath769 is an irreducible hypersurface of degree @xmath802 . its defining polynomial is the discriminant @xmath803 of the ternary quartic @xmath804 the discriminant @xmath803 is a homogeneous polynomial of degree @xmath802 in the @xmath21 indeterminates @xmath805 . in what follows we shall present an explicit expression for @xmath803 . that expression will be derived from a beautiful classical formula due to sylvester which can be found in section 3.4.d , starting on page 118 , of the book by gel@xmath806fand , kapranov , and zelevinsky @xcite . according to ( 1.7 , page 434 ) , the discriminant @xmath803 is proportional to the resultant @xmath807 of the three partial derivatives of the quartic @xmath239 . here @xmath808 denotes the resultant of three ternary cubics , and the precise relation is @xmath809 . we write @xmath810 for the space of linear forms on @xmath66 , and we introduce the linear map @xmath811 next , for an exponent vector @xmath812 of degree @xmath813 and any variable @xmath814 , we choose a decomposition of the cubic partial derivative @xmath815 where @xmath816 , @xmath817 , and @xmath818 are forms of degree @xmath819 , @xmath820 , and @xmath821 , respectively . then @xmath822 is a quartic polynomial . finally , we define a linear map @xmath823 by sending @xmath824 , where @xmath825 is the basis dual to the monomial basis of @xmath826 . ( sylvester @xcite ) the discriminant @xmath803 is proportional to the resultant of the ternary cubics @xmath827 which is equal to the determinant of the linear map @xmath828 this is an irreducible homogeneous polynomial of degree @xmath802 in the @xmath21 coefficients @xmath805 . we write this map explicitly as a @xmath829 matrix @xmath830 whose rows are indexed by the @xmath21 monomials @xmath831 of degree @xmath832 and whose columns are indexed by @xmath21 auxiliary quartics , and whose entry in a given row and column is the coefficient of that monomial in that auxiliary quartic . nine of the quartics come from the map @xmath833 in . they are @xmath834 the other six are the polynomials @xmath835 , @xmath836 , @xmath837 , @xmath838 , @xmath839 , and @xmath840 from @xmath841 . we only describe @xmath835 and @xmath838 as the others may be recovered from these by symmetry . for @xmath835 , note that each partial derivative of @xmath239 has six terms divisible by @xmath707 , three divisible by @xmath708 and not @xmath707 , and a unique term involving @xmath842 . this leads to a decomposition , and @xmath835 is the determinant of the @xmath843 matrix : @xmath844 by a similar reasoning , we find that @xmath838 is the determinant of the @xmath843 matrix : @xmath845 this concludes our discussion of the algebraic boundary of the coorbitope cone @xmath769 . we close with the remark that the notations @xmath846 and @xmath847 are consistent with those used in the paper @xcite where these cones consist of concentration matrices and sufficient statistics of a certain gaussian model . the _ grassmann orbitope _ @xmath415 is the convex hull of the grassmann variety of oriented @xmath23-dimensional linear subspaces of @xmath24 in its plcker embedding in the unit sphere in @xmath22 . equivalently , this is the highest weight orbitope for the group @xmath0 acting on @xmath22 : @xmath848 faces of the grassmann orbitope are of considerable interest in differential geometry since , according to the fundamental theorem of calibrations , they correspond to area - minimizing @xmath23-dimensional submanifolds of @xmath24 . references to this subject include the seminal article on calibrated geometries by harvey and lawson @xcite and the beautiful expositions by morgan @xcite . in this section we review basic known facts about @xmath415 and we initiate its study from the perspectives of combinatorics , semidefinite programming , and algebraic geometry . vectors in @xmath22 are written in terms of plcker coordinates relative to the standard basis : @xmath849 the plcker vector @xmath133 lies in the _ oriented grassmann variety _ if and only if it is decomposable , i.e. @xmath850 for some pairwise orthogonal subset @xmath851 of @xmath852 . this happens if and only if @xmath133 lies in the unit sphere in @xmath22 and satisfies all quadratic plcker relations , the relations among the @xmath853-minors of a @xmath854-matrix . these relations generate the prime ideal called the _ plcker ideal _ @xmath855 . thus the oriented grassmann variety is the algebraic subvariety of @xmath22 defined by the ideal @xmath856 the convex hull of that real algebraic variety is the @xmath857-dimensional grassmann orbitope @xmath415 . [ ex : g24 ] the grassmann orbitope @xmath858 is the convex hull of the variety of @xmath859 as suggested by ( * ? ? ? * proposition 3.2 ) , we perform the orthogonal change of coordinates @xmath860 this is simultaneous rotation by @xmath861 in each of the coordinate planes spanned by the pairs @xmath862 , @xmath863 , and @xmath864 . in these new coordinates , the prime ideal ( [ eq : pluckerideal24 ] ) equals @xmath865 this reveals that @xmath858 is the direct product of two three - dimensional balls of radius @xmath866 . we next examine the case @xmath867 and arbitrary @xmath55 . the vectors @xmath133 in @xmath868 can be identified with skew - symmetric @xmath17-matrices , and this brings us back to the orbitopes in section 3.2 . if @xmath133 is a real skew - symmetric matrix whose eigenvalues are @xmath872 , where @xmath873 , then the matrix @xmath874 is hermitian and its eigenvalues are the real numbers @xmath875 . recall that the operator @xmath876 computes the @xmath114-th additive compound matrix of a given matrix . [ thm : g2n ] let @xmath877 and @xmath878 . the grassmann orbitope equals the spectrahedron @xmath879 its algebraic boundary @xmath880 is an irreducible hypersurface of degree @xmath881 , defined by a factor of the determinant of the matrix @xmath882 . the proper faces of @xmath869 are @xmath883-orbitopes for @xmath884 . every face @xmath150 is associated with an even - dimensional subspace @xmath885 equipped with an orthogonal complex structure and the extreme points of @xmath150 correspond to complex lines in @xmath885 . everything in this theorem is also true for the small cases @xmath886 , with the exception that the quartic hypersurface @xmath887 is not irreducible , as was seen in example [ ex : g24 ] . in light of theorem [ thm : facelatticeskewsh ] , the reducibility of @xmath858 arises because the two - dimensional crosspolytope equals the square , which decomposes as a minkowski sum of two line segments . this may also be seen as the stabilizer of a decomposable tensor in @xmath69 is @xmath888 , where @xmath889 is the identity matrix , and @xmath890 , so @xmath858 is also an orbitope for @xmath891 . we begin with the last statement about the face lattice of @xmath869 . this result is well - known in the theory of calibrations , where it is usually phrased as follows : _ every face of the grassmannian of two - planes in @xmath24 consists of the complex lines in some @xmath892-dimensional subspace of @xmath24 under some orthogonal complex structure_. see @xcite . to derive the spectrahedral representation ( [ eq : spectrag2n ] ) , we note that the eigenvalues of @xmath893 are the sums of any @xmath114 distinct numbers of the eigenvalues of the skew - symmetric matrix @xmath133 . these are @xmath894 if @xmath55 is even and @xmath895 if @xmath55 is odd . in light of corollary [ rmk : grassinsec3 ] , we can apply the results in section 3.2 to conclude that @xmath133 lies in @xmath869 if and only if @xmath896 for all choices of signs . in terms of polyhedral geometry , this condition means that the vector @xmath897 lies in the crosspolytope @xmath898 . since all @xmath899 eigenvalues of @xmath893 are bounded above by the maximum of the @xmath881 special eigenvalues @xmath900 , we conclude that @xmath901 if and only if @xmath902 . to compute the algebraic boundary @xmath903 we consider the expression @xmath904 this is a symmetric polynomial of degree @xmath905 in the squared eigenvalues @xmath906 , and hence it can be written as a polynomial in the coefficients of the characteristic polynomial @xmath907 the resulting polynomial has degree @xmath881 in the entries @xmath908 of the matrix @xmath909 , and it vanishes on the boundary of the orbitope @xmath869 . it can be checked that it is irreducible for @xmath877 . let @xmath910 and consider the characteristic polynomial of our hermitian matrix : @xmath911 the algebraic boundary of the grassmann orbitope @xmath912 is derived from the polynomial @xmath913 we rewrite this expression in terms of the @xmath21 unknowns @xmath914 to get an irreducible polynomial of degree @xmath915 with @xmath916 terms . this is the defining polynomial of the hypersurface @xmath917 . for @xmath918 we use the same polynomial in @xmath919 but now there is one more eigenvalue @xmath146 . the defining polynomial of @xmath920 has @xmath921 terms of degree @xmath915 in the @xmath922 matrix entries @xmath914 . we now come to the harder case @xmath923 . the grassmann orbitope @xmath924 is a @xmath925-dimensional convex body . its facial structure was determined by dadok and harvey in @xcite , and independently by morgan in @xcite . we present their well - known results in our language . 1 . one - dimensional faces from pairs of subspaces that satisfy the angle condition ( [ eq : threeangles ] ) ; 2 . three - dimensional faces that arise as @xmath60-orbitopes and these are round @xmath71-balls ; 3 . @xmath774-dimensional faces that are @xmath926-orbitopes , from the lagrangian grassmannian . harvey and morgan @xcite extended these results to @xmath927 . we will here focus on @xmath923 . our first goal is to explain the faces described in theorem [ thm : morgan36 ] , starting with the edges . let @xmath928 and @xmath929 be three - dimensional linear subspaces in @xmath930 with corresponding unit length plcker vectors @xmath133 and @xmath794 . we define @xmath931 to be the minimum angle between any unit vector @xmath932 and any unit vector @xmath933 . next , @xmath934 is the minimum angle between two unit vectors @xmath935 and @xmath936 such that @xmath937 and @xmath938 . finally , we define @xmath939 to be the angle between two unit vectors @xmath940 and @xmath941 such that @xmath942 and @xmath943 . we refer to ( * ? ? ? * lemma 2.3 ) for the fact that @xmath944 and @xmath945 are well defined by this rule . the angle condition referred to in part ( 1 ) of theorem [ thm : morgan36 ] is the inequality @xmath946 the convex hull of @xmath133 and @xmath794 is an exposed edge of @xmath924 if and only if the condition ( [ eq : threeangles ] ) holds . the maximal facets in part ( 3 ) of theorem [ thm : morgan36 ] are known to geometers as _ special lagrangian facets _ , and we represent them as orbitopes as follows . the _ special unitary group _ @xmath926 consists of all complex @xmath426-matrices @xmath434 with @xmath947 and @xmath948 . if @xmath949 and @xmath950 , so that @xmath951 , then we can identify @xmath434 with the real @xmath394-matrix @xmath952 note that this matrix lies in @xmath953 if and only if @xmath954 , @xmath955 , and @xmath956 . hence the transformation @xmath957 realizes @xmath926 as a subgroup of @xmath953 . the orbit @xmath958 is known as the _ special langrangian grassmannian_. this is a five - dimensional real algebraic variety in the unit sphere in @xmath959 . we call its convex hull @xmath960 the _ special lagrangian orbitope_. it is obtained from the @xmath925-dimensional grassmann orbitope @xmath924 by maximizing the linear function @xmath961 , which takes value @xmath70 on that face . the face @xmath962 is @xmath774-dimensional because it satisfies the two affine equations @xmath963 plus the six independent linear equations that cut out the langrangian grassmannian : @xmath964 the exposed faces of type ( 2 ) in theorem [ thm : morgan36 ] are not facets . each of them is the intersection of two special lagrangian facets . for example , consider the two linear functionals @xmath965 which were discussed in @xcite . each of them supports a special lagrangian facet . the intersection of these two @xmath747-dimensional facets is a three - dimensional ball . indeed , the linear functional @xmath966 is bounded above by @xmath70 on @xmath924 , and the subset at which the value equals @xmath70 is contained in the linear span of the six basis vectors @xmath967 where @xmath968 . in the intersection of this linear space with @xmath924 we find the grassmann orbitope @xmath858 from example [ ex : g24 ] , with our linear functional @xmath969 being represented by the scaled coordinate @xmath970 . the face of @xmath858 where @xmath970 attains its maximal value @xmath70 is a @xmath71-ball . this concludes our discussion of the census of faces given in theorem [ thm : morgan36 ] . the first assertion was proved by dadok and harvey in ( * ? ? ? * theorem 7 ) . for the second assertion we proceed as follows . we apply the technique in ( * ? ? ? * lemma 2.2 ) and restrict to the linear subspace @xmath973 of @xmath959 . the intersection of @xmath974 is the @xmath975-orbitope of @xmath976 , where the action is by unitary diagonal @xmath426-matrices , while the intersection @xmath977 is the @xmath978-orbitope of @xmath979 , where the action is by special unitary diagonal @xmath426-matrices , as described in @xcite . we claim that the @xmath978-orbitope @xmath977 is @xmath14-neighborly . this can be seen by examining the bivariate trigonometric polynomials of the form @xmath980 indeed , for any choice of @xmath981 and @xmath982 , we can find eight real coefficients @xmath983 such that @xmath984 and its derivatives vanish at @xmath981 and @xmath982 but @xmath984 is strictly positive elsewhere . the results in @xcite imply that every exposed edge of @xmath974 is also an exposed edge of @xmath924 . we believe that morgan s technique can be adapted to show that _ every _ exposed edge of @xmath977 is an exposed edge of @xmath962 . for the purpose of proving theorem [ thm : g36bad ] , however , we only need to identify _ one _ exposed edge of @xmath977 that is an exposed edge of @xmath962 . the claim that such exposed edges exist can be derived from ( * ? ? ? * theorem 12 ( i ) ) . with the help of philipp rostalski , we also obtained a computational proof of that claim . this was done as follows . we selected various random choices of points @xmath981 and @xmath985 in @xmath63 . each choice specifies two three - dimensional subspaces @xmath928 and @xmath929 of @xmath930 for which equality holds in the angle condition ( [ eq : threeangles ] ) . the corresponding line segment is not an exposed edge of @xmath924 . to show that the line segment between @xmath928 and @xmath929 is exposed in @xmath962 , we use a technique from semidefinite programming . first we compute the eight coefficients @xmath986 of the supporting function @xmath984 as above . this gives a linear function @xmath987 on @xmath959 . we then run a first - order lasserre relaxation ( cf . @xcite ) to minimize this linear function subject to the linear and quadratic constraints that cut out the special lagrangian grassmannian . the optimal value is zero , the optimal lasserre moment matrix has rank two , and its image in @xmath959 lies in the relative interior of the line segment between @xmath928 and @xmath929 . we then re - optimize for various perturbations of the linear function @xmath987 . the output of each run is a rank one moment matrix which certifies either @xmath928 or @xmath929 as optimal solution of the optimization problem . this proves that the face of @xmath962 exposed by @xmath987 is the line segment between @xmath928 and @xmath929 . nicholas mccarthy , david ogilvie , nahum zobin , and veronica zobin , _ convex geometry of coxeter - invariant polyhedra _ , trends in banach spaces and operator theory ( memphis , tn , 2001 ) , contemp . math . 321 , amer . soc . , providence , ri , 2003 , pp . 153179 . kristian ranestad and bernd sturmfels , _ the convex hull of a variety _ , to appear in the julius borcea memorial volume , ( eds . petter brndn , mikael passare and mihai putinar ) , trends in mathematics , birkhuser verlag , arxiv:1004.30 . Abstract:

Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.

Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered . Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video . Paper: quantum information theory is an area of scientific investigation that has witnessed an enormous progress in the last decade @xcite . in the framework of quantum information science , paradigmatic systems of condensed matter physics such as , e.g. , spin chains and harmonic lattices , are analyzed from the point of view of their information content and ability to process and transfer information . fundamental concepts of statistical mechanics and probability , such as the shannon - von neumann entropy @xcite , play a central role in the quantification of bipartite quantum entanglement @xcite . on the other hand , exciting advances in quantum information research are in a sense paying back the debt : the mathematical and theoretical toolkit developed for the characterization and quantification of quantum entanglement has proven useful to tackle questions and improve our understanding in the investigation of strongly correlated systems and quantum phase transitions @xcite . perhaps the most interesting development stemming from the application of the tools of entanglement theory concerns the study of correlation scaling in diversely connected systems , with its relations to conformal field theory and the proof of longstanding conjectures on entropic area laws in spin and harmonic lattice systems @xcite . these investigations and the associated results are of fundamental interest because they allow to enhance the control and establish firmer bounds and limits of applicability on many important tools of simulation and numerical analysis of complex many - body systems , a fundamental task in condensed matter , such as the density matrix renormalization group ( dmrg ) algorithms @xcite , matrix product representations @xcite , the entanglement renormalization ansatz @xcite , and weighted graph states methods @xcite . the pioneering application of quantum information concepts to condensed matter was the observation that two - body entanglement , as quantified by the concurrence , in the ground state of a cooperative system , exhibits peculiar scaling features approaching a quantum critical point @xcite . these seminal studies helped to clarify that at quantum phase transitions @xcite , the dramatic change in the ground state of a many - body system is associated to , or reflected by , a change in the way that quantum fluctuations are correlated , that is , in the way entanglement is distributed among the elementary constituents . many recent efforts have thus been aimed at understanding the behavior of different measures of entanglement at quantum phase transitions , and assessing the corresponding enhancement of properties useful for applications in quantum technology and quantum engineering @xcite . however , since most entanglement measures can be often rewritten in terms of the conventional n - point correlation functions , the presence of a divergence in the former at quantum criticality can be directly traced back to a divergence in the latter @xcite , although in some particular instances entanglement - based studies allowed to discover novel types of phase transitions @xcite . finally , a more technologically oriented product of the interaction between these two areas of research is the study of quantum spin chains as natural information carriers and distributors @xcite , able to realize tasks such as quantum state transfer @xcite and storage @xcite , possibly with maximal fidelity in chains with suitably engineered couplings and dynamics . quantum engineering and quantum technology are being indeed developed at a fast pace . quantum devices are vigorously pursued for applications ranging from nano - sciences to quantum computation and entanglement - enhanced metrology @xcite . despite a large variety of possible implementations involving different physical systems , many relevant properties of such devices can be in fact investigated in a unified setting by appropriate mappings to quantum spin models @xcite . control of separability and entanglement in ground states of quantum spin models plays an important role in entanglement - enabled quantum technology applications , and needs to be characterized and quantified in different physical regimes @xcite . from a more fundamental perspective , the determination of exact solutions endowed with precisely known properties of separability or entanglement , can be of great relevance in the study of advanced models of condensed matter and cooperative systems that are in general not exactly solvable . in this paper we exploit quantum information tools to tackle another important problem in condensed matter physics : the determination and characterization of exact ground states of cooperative systems characterized by the property of being in the form of a fully factorized , tensor product of single - particle pure states , with no quantum correlations between the individual constituents . historically , the occurrence of totally factorized ( unentangled ) ground states of quantum many - body systems was first discovered in the one - dimensional anisotropic heisenberg model with nearest - neighbor interactions by kurmann , thomas and mller @xcite , by adopting a direct method in terms of product state ansatz . this result was later re - derived and extended to two dimensions using quantum monte carlo numerical methods @xcite . the direct product - state ansatz method of kurmann , thomas and mller has been later extended to anisotropic rings with interactions of arbitrary range , by exploiting the observation that factorized ground states break the parity symmetry @xcite . complex quantum systems exhibiting cooperative behaviors , whose ground states are typically entangled @xcite , may thus admit , for some non trivial values of the hamiltonian parameters , a ground state which is completely separable . the occurrence of factorization at finite or even strong values of the couplings is thus an effect of a delicate balancing between interactions and external fields . the phenomenon of ground state factorization is particularly intriguing as it appears to be associated with the presence of an `` entanglement phase transition '' with no classical counterpart @xcite . furthermore , for the purposes of quantum engineering applications , that employ distributed entanglement in order to manipulate and transfer information @xcite , factorization points need to be exactly identified and either avoided , in order to guarantee the reliable implementation of quantum devices , or properly exploited for the dynamical creation of strongly entangled multipartite states of large assemblies of microsystems ( graph and cluster states ) . finally , and also quite importantly , for models not admitting exact general solutions , achieving knowledge of the exact ground state , even if only for the restricted nontrivial set of parameters associated to factorization , would allow ( i ) to prove the existence of an ordered phase and characterize it ; ( ii ) to build variational or perturbative approximation schemes around the exact factorized solution , that may then be used as test benchmarks for the validity and the precision of numerical algorithms and simulations . unfortunately , the direct method based on the ansatz of a factorized solution is neither sufficiently general nor mathematically tractable , apart from the notable exceptions of one - dimensional spin chains with short - range @xcite , infinite - range @xcite , and some types of long - range exchange interactions @xcite . in a recent work @xcite we introduced an analytic method that allows to determine exactly the existence of factorized ground states and to characterize their properties in quantum spin models defined on regular lattices of any size ( finite as well as at the thermodynamic limit ) , in any spatial dimension , and with spin - spin interactions of arbitrary range . in correspondence to rigorously established ground state factorizability , the method also allows to determine novel sets of exact solutions in generally non exactly solvable models . all the previous particular findings can be rigorously re - derived and extended within a unified framework inspired by concepts of quantum information science . in the present work we extend the original method introduced in ref . @xcite and we develop a general self - contained theory of ground state factorization in ( frustration - free ) quantum spin systems : with no _ a priori _ assumption on the nature of the magnetic ordering , we derive a complete and closed set of conditions that have to be satisfied by the hamiltonian interaction parameters in order for the ground state to be factorized , at precisely determined values of the external magnetic field , with well defined values of the magnetization and of the energy . besides the completely rigorous re - derivation of the few previously known results on quantum factorization points @xcite , our general analytic method allows to determine novel , exact factorization points and factorized ground states in , generally non exactly solvable , spin-@xmath0 models as well as in the corresponding hamiltonian models of any higher spin . these results hold true regardless of spatial dimensionality and interaction range , and can be easily extended even to non - translationally invariant systems . we illustrate the versatility of the method with a series of different applications , including models with nearest - neighbor interactions ( for which we provide the full factorization diagram , generalizing the results of refs . @xcite and of our recent work @xcite ) , models with long - range interactions ( notably including , among others , the fully connected infinite - range lipkin - meshkov - glick ( lmg ) model @xcite and systems with unbalanced next - to - nearest - neighbor interactions on cubic lattices ) , and models with spatial anisotropies . the paper is organized as follows . an excursus on the problem of ground state factorization is presented in sec . [ sec.history ] . in sec . [ sec.squoexe ] we recall the quantum information toolkit upon which our method is based , in particular the formalism of single - spin , or single - qubit , unitary operations and associated entanglement excitation energies , previously introduced for the characterization and quantification of bipartite entanglement from an abstract geometrical perspective @xcite . the general method for the rigorous determination of factorized ground states , that generalizes the scheme introduced in ref . @xcite , is discussed in full detail in sec . [ sec.method ] . relevant applications and examples , including models defined on lattices of different spatial dimensions and with different interaction ranges as well as extensions to models with spatial anisotropies and with dimerized interactions are discussed in sec . [ sec.short ] , sec . [ sec.long ] , sec . [ sec.lmg ] , and sec . [ sec.anisotropy ] . concluding remarks and outlooks on future perspectives are presented in sec . [ sec.concl ] . quantum fluctuations in the ground states of cooperative many - body systems are typically highly correlated , that is , those states contain in the most general instance a strong degree of entanglement distributed among the individual components . this is one of the reasons why their exact characterization is often hard to be accomplished by analytical or even numerical methods . however , there may exist particular solutions corresponding to special values of the hamiltonian parameters such that the ground state becomes `` classical - like '' , in the sense of being a full product state of single - site factors ( completely separable , fully factorized state ) . it is quite surprising that despite the inherent appeal of such exact , special solutions , and the renewed interest stemming from possible applications to quantum technology , very few analytical advances were obtained in the last quarter of a century . the first systematic work on ground state factorization in quantum spin models was completed by kurmann , thomas , and mller in 1982 @xcite . they focused on the one - dimensional nearest - neighbor anisotropic heisenberg - like antiferromagnetic spin-@xmath0 model in transverse field , with the assumption that all the spin - spin couplings take nonnegative values . et al . _ identified a precise value of the external magnetic field , the `` factorizing field '' , corresponding to which the system admits a fully factorized ground state . they employed a very direct , brute force " method , i.e. formulating a product state ansatz and verifying if and for what values of the hamiltonian parameters it satisfies the stationary schrdinger problem with lowest energy . even though this approach appears obvious and extremely easy to pursue , the positive result obtained by kurmann _ _ in the case of the 1-d heisenberg model was enabled by some special properties of the case they analyzed . in fact , in order to verify the eigenvalue equation for the product state ansatz , one needs to decompose the total hamiltonian of the system into a series of pairwise terms , which could be done easily for the model studied by kurmann _ _ since all the `` pairwise components '' of the factorizing magnetic field had the same weight in this particular case . however , this direct method of determining factorization is in fact significantly less obvious , useful , and comprehensive , when one tries to apply it to more general cases . for instance , considering models with interaction terms of growing spatial range , and/or increasing the spatial dimensionality of the lattice , and/or treating extensions to spatially anisotropic or non - translationally invariant models , results in increasingly hard `` guesses '' concerning the partitioning of the external field into pairwise components and in increasingly nontrivial verification steps . depending on the structure of the model and on the form of the product state ansatz , the direct method may either fail to detect factorization points at all , or it may detect only a subset of all physically realizable factorized solutions , or finally it may lead to intractable sets of conditions . these limitations of the direct method become evident , as we will see in the following , even in the simplest 1-d @xmath1 model with nearest - neighbor interactions analyzed by kurmann and coworkers . in their original work , due to the insufficient generality of their proposed product ansatz , they failed to identify a wide range of situations that allow the existence of factorized ground states . as we will see when discussing models with competing interactions of different spatial ranges , a further serious fault of the direct method , that becomes incurable in the presence of frustration , is its incorrect assessment of factorized ground states that are in fact excited energy eigenstates of the system . following the seminal analysis by kurmann _ _ , the direct method has been applied to the fully connected infinite - range lipkin - meshkov - glick model by dusuel and vidal @xcite , and to the anisotropic heisenberg chain with the same interactions of arbitrary range along the three spatial directions by hoeger et al . @xcite and by rossignoli _ we would like to remark that these works , that include the results of refs . @xcite as special cases , provide an interesting characterization of factorization points in finite ( one - dimensional ) translationally invariant lattice spin models with periodic boundary conditions as those points where the parity symmetry is broken . a general and rigorous approach to the problem of ground state separability , completely different from the direct method based on the product state ansatz , has been introduced by us in ref . @xcite and is fully developed in the present work . this analytic method allows _ inter alia _ to complete the factorization diagram of the anisotropic spin-@xmath0 models without restrictions on the sign of the couplings , and to go significantly beyond the limitations of the previously mentioned studies . our approach is based on an additional characterization of product states ( including product ground states ) that employs concepts and tools of quantum information and entanglement theory . the strong point of the quantum informatic approach to ground state factorization lies in its generality and its ensuing independence from the types and ranges of interactions present in the hamiltonian , the lattice size , and the spatial dimension , which makes it applicable in the most general cases and therefore especially useful in all the situations that are either intractable or incomplete if one resorts to the direct method or to numerical techniques . in fact , in the original formulation of the quantum informatic method @xcite there was still trace of a residual `` ansatz '' in the initial stage , since the magnetic ordering of the candidate factorized ground state had to be in some sense guessed , and imposed _ a priori_. moreover , in the final stage , we were not yet able to derive a completely general set of conditions in order to determine in each situation whether a candidate factorized state that turned out to belong to the spectrum of the hamiltonian was actually a ground state or belonged to the set of excited states . this had then to be decided case by case in each specific instance . in the present work we proceed further and develop the complete method to determine and characterize factorized ground states in quantum cooperative systems . we provide the systematics that allows to determine the occurrence of full ground state separability given a generic quantum spin hamiltonian . the magnetic ordering is derived as a consequence of the theory and not imposed _ a priori_. a complete set of general conditions is established for the verification of ground state factorization , and the elegance of the method does not hinder practical usefulness in the application to specific models and situations . we would like to recall that numerical advances on the problem of ground state factorization have been realized by the monte carlo study of ground state factorization in two - dimensional anisotropic nearest - neighbor spin models @xcite . unfortunately , beyond this important result the numerical approach appears to have a very restricted potential for extensions , since the required computational power increases rapidly with the spatial dimension and/or with the range of interactions . we will show that the difficulties inherent to the direct analytic approach and to the numerical method are intrinsically absent in our formalism . in the present section we provide a brief overview of some recent results on the geometrical interpretation of the entanglement measure known as `` tangle '' ( linear entropy ) @xcite and the consequences it entails for the relationship between energy and pairwise entanglement @xcite . such results embody the premises for our all - analytic characterization of ground state separability in quantum spin systems . here and in the following we consider generic systems made of @xmath2 spin-@xmath0 elementary constituents , or , in the language of quantum information , @xmath2 qubits . for such a system , we introduce the set of single - qubit unitary operations ( _ squos _ ) @xmath3 @xcite , defined as the unitary transformations that act separately as the identity on any spin of the system except the @xmath4-th one , on which they act instead as hermitian , unitary , and traceless operators : @xmath5 in eq . ( [ e.uk ] ) @xmath6 stands for the identity operator on the @xmath7-th spin of the system while the generic hermitian , unitary , and traceless operator @xmath8 can be expressed as a linear combination of the standard spin operators ( @xmath9 ) defined on the @xmath4-th spin : @xmath10 in the previous definition the parameters @xmath11 and @xmath12 take values respectively in the ranges @xmath13 $ ] and @xmath14 . physically , @xmath15 corresponds to a rotation in the spin space , and the traceless condition imposes the rotation operation to be orthogonal to the identity , so basically a combination of spin flip and phase flip . a squo transforms every pure state @xmath16 into a new state @xmath17 , that in general differs from @xmath18 . we may quantify the action of the squo in terms of the trace distance between the original and the transformed state , defined as @xmath19 . the distance @xmath20 varies in the interval @xmath21 $ ] and vanishes if and only if the two states coincide , meaning that the considered squo leaves the original state unchanged . for a given initial state and for any site @xmath4 , one can determine the _ extremal - squo _ ( e - squo ) that minimizes such a distance . one can prove that the e - squo is uniquely determined by the following conditions on the angular variables @xcite : @xmath22 where @xmath23 denotes the expectation value of the spin operator @xmath24 on the unperturbed state @xmath18 ( @xmath25 ) . the e - squo plays a crucial role in our analysis : for any pure state defined on a general system of interacting qubits one can prove @xcite that the square of the distance associated to the action of the e - squo coincides with the linear entropy @xmath26 $ ] of the @xmath4-th qubit ( where @xmath27 denotes the reduced density matrix of qubit @xmath4 ) . this quantity , also known as the _ tangle _ @xmath28 in the literature , is an entanglement monotone for qubit systems and satisfies important monogamy constraints @xcite . being a monotonic function of the von neumann entropy of entanglement @xcite , it quantifies the bipartite block entanglement present in the state @xmath18 between spin @xmath4 and the remaining @xmath29 constituents , and is thus a proper measure of single - site entanglement @xcite . one has the following relation @xcite : @xmath30 \ ; .\ ] ] this geometric - operational characterization of the tangle allows to develop a quantum informatic approach to the problem of characterizing the correlation properties of the ground state in many - body quantum systems @xcite . let us consider a collection of spin-@xmath0 systems defined on a regular lattice , with hamiltonian @xmath31 , and let @xmath18 denote from now on the ground state of @xmath31 . if the system is in the ground state , the application of a squo on a generic spin of the lattice is necessarily associated to an energy transfer that one must provide to the system in order to realize the selected squo . in other words , a squo perturbs the system , and this perturbation results in an increase of the average energy ( obviously , in general the transformed state needs not to be an eigenstate of the hamiltonian ) . such energy deviation from the ground - state value can be quantitatively defined as @xmath32 because @xmath18 is the ground state of @xmath31 , @xmath33 is a non negative defined quantity . considering the special relation between the e - squo and the tangle we may expect that the associated amount of energy difference @xmath34 , appropriately named ` entanglement excitation energy ' ( exe ) , will have as well a strong , direct connection with the tangle and in general with the single - site entanglement in the ground state . in fact , starting from the above definition of eq . ( [ e.ees ] ) and taking into account the property of the e - squo of leaving unchanged a fully disentangled state , it has been established in full generality @xcite that if the system is invariant under spatial translation and the hamiltonian of the system does not commute with any possible squo , then the vanishing of the exe is a _ necessary and sufficient _ condition to admit a fully factorized ground state @xmath18 @xcite . hence , if the system that we want to analyze satisfies all the former hypotheses , the vanishing of the exe provides an additional condition , besides the vanishing of the tangle @xmath28 , that one needs to include in establishing a general analytic approach to the problem of ground state factorization . the general method that was first partially developed in ref . @xcite for the determination of existence , location , and exact form of factorized ground states rests on the following two main observations : the ground state @xmath18 of a spin-@xmath0 hamiltonian @xmath31 is factorized if and only if the single - site entanglement ( tangle ) @xmath28 vanishes for all spins @xmath4 in the lattice ; provided that @xmath35\neq 0 $ ] for every possible squo @xmath36 of the form eq . ( [ e.uk ] ) , the ground state @xmath18 of a spin-@xmath0 hamiltonian @xmath31 is factorized if and only if the exe @xmath37 vanishes @xmath38 . in ref . @xcite , the strategy to the determination and understanding of factorization for a given hamiltonian bore on the above two facts and on the requirement to assume as working point a phase endowed with some kind of magnetic order . by imposing the vanishing of the exe and of the tangle , we showed how to determine uniquely the form of the completely disentangled state compatible with the assumed magnetic order , candidate to be the ground state of the system at a particular value of the external magnetic field ( labeled as `` factorizing field '' ) . the final steps of the procedure concern the determination of exact analytic conditions for the candidate factorized state to be an eigenstate of the hamiltonian with lowest energy . in ref . @xcite , we derived a closed set of eigenstate conditions , but establishing whether a factorized eigenstate is actually a ground state had to be left to a case by case analysis . in the present paper we generalize the method , extend its scope , and apply it to different classes of quantum spin models . firstly , we will show that there is no need for _ a priori _ assumptions on the magnetic order . in fact , we will prove that the existence of a factorized ground state is a necessary and sufficient condition for the existence of quantum phase transitions and ordered phases in translationally - invariant quantum spin models with exchange interactions and in the presence of external fields . moreover , the actual structure of the factorized ground state determines automatically the kind of ordered phase . further , we derive a complete set of rigorous conditions for the candidate disentangled state to be an eigenstate and a ground state . in particular , for systems with no frustration we prove that if the factorized state is an eigenstate , then it is always a ground state of the system . we illustrate the method in detail by considering its application to the general , translationally invariant , exchange hamiltonian @xmath31 for spin-@xmath0 systems on a @xmath20-dimensional regular lattices , with spin - spin interactions of arbitrary range and arbitrary anisotropic couplings : @xmath39 here @xmath40 ( and similarly @xmath41 ) is a @xmath20-dimensional index vector identifying a site in the lattice , @xmath42 @xmath43 stands for the spin-@xmath0 operator on site @xmath40 , @xmath44 is external field directed along the @xmath45 direction , @xmath46 is the distance between two lattice sites , and @xmath47 is the spin - spin coupling along the @xmath48 direction . translational invariance is ensured by the fact that all the couplings depend only on the distance @xmath49 between the spins . this type of hamiltonian encompasses a large variety of models and spans over several universality classes including , among others , the ising , xy , heisenberg , and xyz symmetry classes . besides their importance in quantum statistical mechanics and in the theory of quantum critical phenomena , these models play an important role in the study of various schemes of quantum information and quantum communication tasks with quantum many - body systems @xcite . it is a rather straightforward exercise to verify that the hamiltonian eq . ( [ e.hamiltonian ] ) never commutes with the squos @xmath50 . translational invariance and non - commutativity of the hamiltonian with the squos guarantee that the vanishing of the exe is a necessary and sufficient condition for the full separability of the ground state [ statement ( ii ) above ] . since the external field @xmath44 is uniform on the lattice , it forces the existence of a site - independent , nonvanishing magnetization @xmath51 along the @xmath45 axis : @xmath52 . on the other hand , at a factorization point , statement ( i ) above imposes the vanishing of the single - site entanglement on all sites of the lattice . therefore , if a factorization point exists , the magnetizations along the directions orthogonal to the external field must assume the following form : @xmath53 where @xmath54 is the modulus of the projection of the magnetization on the @xmath55 plane and the local orientations @xmath56 , and hence the type of magnetic ordering in the @xmath55 plane , remain undetermined . since @xmath51 is site - independent , then @xmath57 is site - independent as well . taking into account eq . ( [ e.minimumpoint ] ) of sec . [ sec.squoexe ] one sees that , at least at the factorization point , @xmath58 , i.e. one of the two angles that fix the orientation of the e - squo , does not depend on the site index . therefore @xmath59 @xmath60 . collecting the former results and considering that in the presence of a factorized ground state , if it exists , all the correlation functions are products of single - site expectations values , we obtain that the condition on the vanishing of the exe associated to the generic site @xmath61 reads : @xmath62 in the former equation @xmath63 is the _ factorizing field _ , i.e. the value , if it exists , of the external field for which ground state factorization occurs . since we are looking for a fully factorized ground state , eq . ( [ e.exe ] ) must be satisfied simultaneously for all @xmath61 and , henceforth , eq . ( [ e.exe ] ) must be site - independent . this fact in turn implies that the following relation must be satisfied by every angle @xmath56 : @xmath64 eq . ( [ e.exe ] ) must hold independently of the site on which the e - squo acts and the value of the constant @xmath65 must be identified by determining the expression of the energy density , i.e. the energy per site , associated to the factorized ground state . given the total ground - state energy @xmath66 and the total number of sites @xmath2 , the latter quantity can be written as @xmath67 where @xmath68 is the coordination number , that is the number of sites at distance @xmath49 from a given site . in order to determine the magnetic order in the candidate factorized ground state , one can now exploit the fact that , by definition , it must minimize the energy of the system . therefore such state will be simply characterized by the magnetic order that minimizes the per - site contribution @xmath65 , depending on the hamiltonian parameters and the geometric structure of the lattice . thus the general conditions for full separability of the ground state lead to the uncovering of the magnetic order in the @xmath55 plane . in the original formulation of the quantum - informatic method @xcite one had to assume from the beginning the type of ordered phase , and this resulted in constraints on the magnetization and limitations in the range of the coupling coefficients . the outcome of the minimization of the energy density depends on the presence or the absence of frustration in the system , either due to the lattice geometry , or to the structure of the hamiltonian , or to both causes . for hamiltonians belonging to the class of eq . ( [ e.hamiltonian ] ) , frustration can be due both to the geometry of the lattice , e.g. for systems with nearest - neighbor antiferromagnetic interactions defined on a lattice that admits closed loops with an odd number of spins , and to the competition of interactions of different spatial orders , e.g. in systems defined on linear chains with nearest - neighbor ferromagnetic and next - nearest - neighbor antiferromagnetic interactions . frustration effects in systems with interactions of different spatial ranges arise whenever it happens that the minimization of the energy associated to interactions over a certain spatial scale precludes the possibility of minimizing the energy associated to interactions over a different spatial scale . in the absence of frustration , i.e. when the lattice geometry and the interactions between the spins are such to allow all energy minimizations simultaneously , it is straightforward to prove that every possible factorized ground state must be characterized by one of only four magnetic orders out of the many possible ones . the complete proof of this statement is reported in appendix [ appendixfourcases ] . this restricted set includes ferromagnetic ordering along the @xmath69 direction ( @xmath70 ) or along the @xmath71 direction ( @xmath72 ) , and antiferromagnetic ordering along the @xmath69 direction ( @xmath73 ) or along the @xmath71 direction ( @xmath74 ) , the type of order effectively present in the ground state can be determined by comparing the values of the different `` net interactions '' along the @xmath69 and @xmath71 directions , where the net interactions are defined as follows : @xmath75 with @xmath76 . the net interaction along the @xmath45 direction is defined equivalently as @xmath77 as a function of the net interactions , the magnetic orders in the system are determined by the values of @xmath78 : @xmath79 it is interesting to observe that , in terms of the net interactions , one can immediately establish the presence or absence of frustration in the system : any frustration arising from the presence of competing interactions would imply that @xmath80 , with @xmath76 depending on which of the two axes is characterized by a non vanishing value of the magnetization . we remark that here and in the following we are not considering the particular situation in which a _ saturation _ occurs rather than a true ground state factorization : this instance will be discussed separately in subsec . [ s.sec.saturation ] . from now on , without loss of generality , we will specialize our analysis to the the case of an antiferromagnetic ordering along the @xmath69 direction . with trivial modifications , all the steps and results that will be obtained in the following hold as well in the remaining three cases of eq . ( [ fourcases ] ) . at the end of the procedure we will present a summary table collecting the main results for all the four types of magnetic orders compatible with factorization . given an antiferromagnetic ordering along the @xmath69 direction , and keeping in mind that in such case @xmath73 , eq . ( [ e.magnxy ] ) implies that @xmath81 while @xmath82 with @xmath83 . the @xmath84 sign reflects the fact that the antiferromagnetic order discriminates between two sublattices , each characterized by the opposite sign of the staggered magnetization along @xmath69 . consequently , the general condition eq . ( [ e.exe ] ) takes the form @xmath85 \ , , \end{aligned}\ ] ] that admits two solutions for @xmath86 , @xmath87 however , since the e - squo must be unique @xcite , the two solutions must coincide . factorization thus requires that @xmath88 moreover , the requirement of a vanishing tangle ( single - site entanglement ) imposes @xmath89 combining eqs.([e.mz][e.mx ] ) via eq . ( [ e.minimumpoint ] ) yields a closed expression for the phase @xmath86 as a function of the hamiltonian parameters and of the factorizing field @xmath63 : @xmath90 therefore , eq . ( [ e.theta ] ) , together with the knowledge of @xmath91 , once inserted into eq . ( [ e.ok ] ) , determines , independently of the value of the magnetizations , the form of the e - squo at factorization : @xmath92 the form of the candidate factorized state @xmath93 is then readily determined by imposing that the action of the e - squo on all lattice sites leaves the ground state invariant : @xmath94 > from eqs.([e.inalterate][e.oz ] ) we find then that the candidate factorized ground state @xmath93 has to be a tensor product of single - site states that are the exact eigenstates of the operators @xmath95 with eigenvalue @xmath0 : @xmath96 equation ( [ e.candidate ] ) expresses the general form that a factorized ground state must assume given an antiferromagnetic order along @xmath69 . this result is independent of the actual values assumed by the staggered magnetizations @xmath97 s . we remark that in order to establish the general form of the candidate ground state it is essential to impose the vanishing of the exe . in fact , without requiring it , the phase @xmath86 and the candidate factorized ground state become explicitly dependent on the magnetizations . then , imposing the conditions for eq . ( [ e.candidate ] ) to be an eigenstate of the hamiltonian , one merely obtains a relation between the factorizing field @xmath63 and the magnetizations @xmath98 s . if the analytic expression of at least one of the @xmath98 s is known , it is still possible to obtain an expression of the field @xmath63 in terms of the hamiltonian parameters . however , this actually occurs in few special , exactly solvable , cases ( for instance , the xy model @xcite ) . otherwise , in general one needs to resort to numerical evaluations of the magnetizations or introduce other approximations in the analysis . this problem is completely eliminated in the general analytic framework based on the invariance of the factorized ground states under the action of e - squos and on the vanishing of the exe at factorization . before proceeding further let us clarify a relevant point . because of the even - odd symmetry of the energy spectra of the system , as elucidated also in refs . @xcite , the assignment of one of the two different staggered magnetizations to each sublattice is arbitrary . according to this observation , one sees that , inverting the sign of the magnetization along the @xmath69 direction on each site , all the conditions for factorization are still satisfied but the candidate ground state takes the form @xmath99 obviously the two states in eq . ( [ e.candidate ] ) and in eq . ( [ e.candidate-1 ] ) are distinguishable and both @xmath93 and @xmath100 are legitimate candidate ground states of the system , as well as general linear combinations of the two ( the latter will be in general highly entangled ) . here and in the following we assume to be working in a situation of broken symmetry , i.e. after that a small perturbing external field along the @xmath69 direction has lifted the degeneracy between @xmath93 and @xmath100 , e.g. lowering the energy of the former and rising that of the latter . after a time long enough to ensure convergence to equilibrium , i.e. relaxation to the state @xmath93 , the perturbation is switched off : in the thermodynamic limit , this ensures that the system will remain indefinitely in the state @xmath93 . having determined the exact form of the candidate factorized ground state , the subsequent step concerns the determination of the conditions for its occurrence , i.e. the conditions under which a state of the form eq . ( [ e.candidate ] ) is indeed the eigenstate of @xmath31 , eq . ( [ e.hamiltonian ] ) , with the lowest energy eigenvalue . to this aim , taking the value of the external field at the factorization point , @xmath101 , it is useful to decompose the total hamiltonian as a sum of pairwise hamiltonian terms @xmath102 , so that @xmath103 , where each term @xmath102 involves only the degrees of freedom of a single pair of spins : @xmath104 here the quantity @xmath105 plays the role of the `` component '' of the factorizing field that acts on the selected pair of spins and obeys the following relation : @xmath106 the above ensures that @xmath107 satisfies eq . ( [ e.theta ] ) . proving that the candidate factorized ground state @xmath93 is an eigenstate of the total hamiltonian @xmath31 is equivalent to prove that it is a simultaneous eigenstate of all pair hamiltonians @xmath108 , or , more precisely , that the projection of @xmath93 onto the subspace of two given spins @xmath40 and @xmath109 which is still a pure state since @xmath93 is a tensor product of single - spin pure states is an eigenstate of @xmath108 for every pair @xmath110 . to proceed , we associate to each lattice site a set of orthogonal spin operators defined as follows : @xmath111 it is immediate to observe that @xmath112 . by inverting eqs . ( [ e.axayaz ] ) , we can conveniently re - express the standard spin operators as functions of the new set of operators @xmath113 : @xmath114 inserting eq . ( [ e.sxsysz ] ) in eq . ( [ e.couple ] ) we obtain the expression of the pair hamiltonian @xmath115 as a function of the sets of operators @xmath113 and @xmath116 : @xmath117 -2 h_f^r \sin \theta \left [ { a_{\underline{i}}^x \left ( a_{\underline{j}}^z -\frac{1}{2}\right ) + \left ( a_{\underline{i}}^z-\frac{1}{2}\right ) a_{\underline{j}}^x } \right ] \nonumber \\ & & + \ a_{\underline{i}}^x a_{\underline{j}}^x \left ( \sin^2 \theta j_z^r+\cos^2\theta ( -1)^r j_x^r \right)+ a_{\underline{i}}^y a_{\underline{j}}^y j_y^r ( -1)^r - h_f^r \cos \theta \left ( { a_{\underline{i}}^z + a_{\underline{j}}^z } \right ) \ , , \end{aligned}\ ] ] where we recall that @xmath49 is the distance between sites @xmath40 and @xmath109 and that , in the presence of an antiferromagnetic order along the @xmath69 direction , @xmath118 . the spin - pair projection @xmath119 of @xmath93 is an eigenstate of the pair hamiltonian @xmath120 either if all terms in eq . ( [ e.pairhij ] ) admit @xmath119 as an eigenstate or if they annihilate it . by construction , recalling that @xmath121 and that @xmath122 is the eigenstate of @xmath123 with eigenvalue equal to @xmath0 , the spin - pair projection of @xmath93 is an eigenstate of the pair hamiltonian if the following condition holds : @xmath124 for general models of the type eq . ( [ e.hamiltonian ] ) with a given , arbitrary , maximum spatial range of interaction @xmath125 , eq . ( [ e.condition ] ) admits the following solution : @xmath126 for all distances @xmath127 , i.e. for all distances associated with nonvanishing couplings ( we recall that @xmath128 and @xmath129 ) . the set of equations ( [ e.solcondition ] ) determines the conditions that must be satisfied simultaneously by the phase @xmath86 , which is unique , in order for @xmath93 to be an eigenstate of the total hamiltonian eq . ( [ e.hamiltonian ] ) . ( [ e.solcondition ] ) discriminate quite clearly between short - range models , i.e. models with only one nonvanishing coupling at @xmath130 ( models with nearest - neighbor interactions ) and all other possible models containing finite- or infinite - range interaction terms . specifically , models with only nearest - neighbor interactions are characterized by the fact that eqs . ( [ e.solcondition ] ) reduce to a single condition and hence if the value of the r.h.s . of eq . ( [ e.solcondition ] ) falls in the interval @xmath21 $ ] ( associated to the permitted values of @xmath131 in terms of the interaction parameters ) , one can immediately conclude that the models under investigation admit a factorized eigenstate . on the other hand , for models containing interaction terms of longer range so that eqs . ( [ e.solcondition ] ) include two or more conditions factorized energy eigenstates are allowed if and only if the r.h.s . of all conditions in the set ( [ e.solcondition ] ) take values in the interval @xmath21 $ ] and , moreover , they all coincide . summing term by term over the index @xmath49 all the relations in eq . ( [ e.condition ] ) , taking into account eq . ( [ e.theta ] ) , and solving for @xmath63 , one eventually obtains the exact expression of the factorizing field as a function of the net interactions : @xmath132 we remark that eq . ( [ e.factorizingfield ] ) , which was derived in ref . @xcite using some unnecessary auxiliary assumptions , is completely general and holds for lattices of arbitrary spatial dimension and for spin - spin interactions of arbitrary range . accordingly , the angle @xmath86 that determines the direction of the e - squo can be also expressed as a function of the net interactions as follows @xmath133 in the case of a maximum range of interaction @xmath134 , relation eq . ( [ e.theta2 ] ) for the net interactions is a necessary but not sufficient condition for factorization , and further use of eqs . ( [ e.condition ] ) and eqs . ( [ e.solcondition ] ) is needed , as we will show with explicit examples in sec . [ sec.long ] and sec . [ sec.anisotropy ] . we are finally left with the problem of establishing conditions for a factorized energy eigenstate @xmath93 to be indeed a ground state of the system . a very simple sufficient but not necessary condition is that the spin - pair projection of @xmath93 onto the subspace of a pair of spins be the simultaneous ground state of every pair hamiltonian @xmath108 . in fact , given the relation existing between all the pair hamiltonians @xmath108 in eq . ( [ e.couple ] ) and the total hamiltonian @xmath31 eq . ( [ e.hamiltonian ] ) , it follows that the simultaneous ground state of all pair hamiltonians @xmath108 is also ground state of @xmath31 . to proceed , let us re - express the pair hamiltonians eq . ( [ e.pairhij ] ) in matrix form in the basis spanned by the eigenstates of the operators @xmath135 . one has @xmath136 where @xmath137 and @xmath138 . making use of eq . ( [ e.theta2 ] ) and eq . ( [ e.hfij ] ) the eigenvalues of the matrix eq . ( [ e.matrix ] ) can be put in the form @xmath139 \nonumber \\ \varepsilon_1 & = & \frac{1}{8 } \left [ 3 ( -1)^r j_x^r - j_z^r - \left ( { j_z^r -(-1)^r j_x^r } \right)\cos \left ( { 2\theta } \right ) \right ] \nonumber \\ \varepsilon_2 & = & \frac{1}{8 } \left [ - 3\left ( { ( -1)^rj_x^r + j_z^r } \right ) + \left ( { j_z^r-(-1)^r j_x^r } \right)\cos \left ( { 2\theta } \right ) \right]\nonumber \\ \varepsilon_3 & = & \frac{1}{8 } \left [ { - 3(-1)^rj_x^r + 5j_z^r + \left ( { j_z^r- ( -1)^r j_x^r } \right)\cos \left ( { 2\theta } \right ) } \right ] \nonumber \\ & & \end{aligned}\ ] ] the eigenvalue @xmath140 is the one associated to the projection @xmath119 of the factorized eigenstate @xmath93 onto the four - dimensional hilbert space associated to the pair of spins @xmath141 . therefore , the spin - pair projection is the ground state of the pair hamiltonian if @xmath142 . imposing this condition yields the following inequalities : @xmath143 & \ge & 0 \ ; ; \label{e.suffcondition.1 } \\ ( -1)^r j_x^r - j_z^r & \le & 0 \ ; . \label{e.suffcondition.2}\end{aligned}\ ] ] notably , these inequalities are automatically satisfied for any interacting spin system that is not frustrated and that verifies all of the eqs . ( [ e.solcondition ] ) . namely , for every even value of the distance @xmath49 in the interaction range ( @xmath127 ) eq . ( [ e.suffcondition.2 ] ) implies that the denominator in the corresponding eq . ( [ e.solcondition ] ) is non - positive . therefore , an acceptable value of @xmath131 can be obtained only if also the numerator is non - positive and exceeds or equals the denominator . these conditions in turn imply the order relation , @xmath144 . on the other hand , comparing eq . ( [ e.suffcondition.2 ] ) and eq . ( [ e.suffcondition.1 ] ) , one has that @xmath145 . therefore , comparing the two order relations yields finally @xmath146 ( @xmath49 even ) . this condition is always verified in systems with an antiferromagnetic order along the @xmath69 direction and in absence of frustration and therefore the projection of the factorized energy eigenstate on the hilbert space of every pair of spins is indeed the ground state of every pair hamiltonian . on the other hand , in the case of odd @xmath49 , eq . ( [ e.suffcondition.2 ] ) implies that the denominator of eq . ( [ e.solcondition ] ) is non - negative and , similarly to the former case , the numerator must be non - negative and not exceeding the denominator . hence we obtain @xmath147 while from eq . ( [ e.suffcondition.1 ] ) we recover @xmath148 that , in turn , implies @xmath149 . again , such inequalities are always verified in the presence of an antiferromagnetic order and in the absence of frustration . [ cols="^,^,^,^ " , ] collecting all these results , we have proved that the following holds : * theorem*. _ for any cooperative system of spin-@xmath0 particles described by hamiltonians @xmath31 of the type [ eq . ( [ e.hamiltonian ] ) ] , characterized by an anti - ferromagnetic order along the @xmath69 axis as emerging from eq . ( [ fourcases ] ) and in the absence of frustration , the simultaneous verification of all eqs . ( [ e.condition ] ) is necessary and sufficient for the fully factorized state eq . ( [ e.candidate ] ) to be the exact ground state of @xmath31 when the external magnetic field takes the value @xmath101 determined by eq . ( [ e.factorizingfield])_. this central result holds as well , with obvious modifications , when one considers the other different ordered phases that form the set identified in eq . ( [ fourcases ] ) . in tab . [ t.summary ] we summarize and compare results for each of the four different possibilities . before moving to apply the general method to specific models and examples of conceptual and physical relevance , we discuss briefly the meaning of factorization and its marked differences with the phenomenon of saturation " ( see below ) . as we have seen , and as it will appear even clearer in the discussion of the examples in the following sections , the physical mechanism of ground state factorization in quantum spin systems is due to a delicate kind of balancing " between the coupling strengths that regulate the intensity ( and range ) of the interactions and the aligning effect of the external field , that tends to orient all spins along a given direction and to destroy all quantum correlations . the remarkable aspect of factorization is then that it occurs , according to well defined conditions and constraints , at precisely defined , finite values of the couplings and of the fields in an ordered ( or symmetry - broken ) phase . this means that factorization occurs when the system is relatively strongly interacting and the external aligning field is relatively weak . moreover , we will see that the factorization point is always a precursor from below ( from the ordered phase ) of the quantum critical point , as first observed for the @xmath1 model with nearest - neighbor interactions @xcite . saturation is the phenomenon of ground state factorization that occurs trivially when the value of the external field grows unboundedly compared to all other hamiltonian parameters . therefore its aligning effect on the spins prevails against all other effects and quantum correlations are suppressed . the main physical difference between proper factorization and saturation is then clear and is reflected at the level of the hilbert space of states . namely , suppose that the system under study admits a fully factorized state that is the true ground state of the system at @xmath101 . then , when one moves away from the factorizing field , i.e. when @xmath150 , the factorized state ceases to be an eigenstate of the hamiltonian . on the contrary , in the presence of saturation , the trivially ensuing factorized state is always an eigenstate of the hamiltonian and remains the ground state of the system when perturbing the value of the external field @xmath44 . let us formalize the above discussion . consider a system that admits a fully factorized ground state . in this case the pair hamiltonian in eq . ( [ e.pairhij ] ) admits as eigenstate a factorized spin - pair state . however , eq . ( [ e.pairhij ] ) is the expression of the pair hamiltonian only at @xmath101 . if we consider a value of the external field different from the factorizing field we must include in eq . ( [ e.pairhij ] ) a term proportional to @xmath151 . obviously , for nonvanishing values of @xmath152 the presence of such term prevents the factorized state from being an eigenstate of the hamiltonian of the system . on the contrary , if @xmath153 and hence if @xmath154 the extra hamiltonian term vanishes and the factorized state @xmath155 remains an energy eigenstate of the system for all values of the external field . this result can be understood from a different point of view . when @xmath156 , from eqs.([e.solcondition ] ) we immediately obtain that @xmath157 , which implies that the total magnetization along the @xmath45 axis is preserved , @xmath158=0 $ ] . therefore the hamiltonian of the system and the total magnetization operator admit a complete set of common eigenstates , discriminated by the eigenvalue of the total magnetization : the factorized state is the one ( and only one ) characterized by the maximum eigenvalue . we now move on to show that the factorized eigenstate , in the case of saturation , is the system s ground state in an infinite range of values of the external field . here and in the following we recall that since the external field is directed along the conventional @xmath45 direction , only saturation with spin alignment along the @xmath45-axis is allowed . at very low values of @xmath44 the ground state of the system will possess a small total magnetization along the field direction . however , as @xmath44 increases , also the total ground - state magnetization along the @xmath45 direction will increase until all spins align with the field and saturation occurs . by increasing @xmath44 further , it is not possible for the system to evolve in a state with higher values of the magnetization along the field direction . hence , the factorized state remains the ground state of the system for all values of the external field @xmath159 , where by @xmath160 we denote the value of the field for which the system reaches saturation ( `` saturating field '' ) . let us consider the matrix representation , similarly to eq . ( [ e.matrix ] ) , of the pair hamiltonian at arbitrary values of @xmath44 . taking into account the condition @xmath153 we have @xmath161 it is immediate to verify that if @xmath162 , the projection of the factorized state onto the considered pair of spins is associated to the lowest energy . re - summing over all values of the spatial range index @xmath49 and taking into account the coordination number @xmath68 of the lattice , we have that the factorized state is the ground state of the total system if @xmath163 eq . ( [ e.hfsaturation ] ) is the rigorous condition for saturation . we notice that it coincides with eq . ( [ e.factorizingfield ] ) in the limit @xmath164 , meaning that in this simple instance no ground - state factorization occurs other than saturation . in the following sections we apply the general theory of factorization to different quantum spin models . we will derive a series of exact results concerning the occurrence of factorized ground states in systems with various types of two - body interactions of different spatial ranges defined on regular lattices of arbitrary spatial dimensionality . the general method enables to determine many novel exact factorized ground state solutions as well as the existence and the nature of ordered phases in models that are , in general , non exactly solvable . moreover , it allows to recover quite straightforwardly the existing analytical and numerical results . in the process , we will come to appreciate that ground state factorization is a phenomenon more common than previously believed . determining the existence of exact factorized solutions in non exactly solvable models should in turn allow to envisage controlled approximation schemes , e.g. perturbative or variational , to investigate the physics of non exactly solvable quantum spin models in the vicinity of quantum factorization points . in this and in the following sections we will consider quantum spin models of the @xmath1 type eq . ( [ e.hamiltonian ] ) defined on regular lattices of arbitrary dimension . let us first consider models with short - range interactions including only nearest - neighbor couplings : @xmath165 as in sec . [ sec.method ] we restrict ourselves to the case in which such models are defined on regular lattices of a generic dimension , whose geometry does not induce any frustration , i.e. in which any closed loop is characterized by an even number of spins . the absence of geometrical frustration together with the fact that all the couplings beyond the nearest neighbor spins vanish , ensure that it is always possible for the system to satisfy all the conditions on the net magnetic interactions . therefore , as shown in sec . [ sec.method ] , if the r.h.s . of eq . ( [ e.solcondition ] ) or , better , if the r.h.s . of the equation relative to each possible magnetic order ( see tab . [ t.summary ] ) takes an acceptable value ( @xmath166 ) then the system admits a fully factorized ground state . in the case of antiferromagnetic ordering along the @xmath69 direction , which is obtained if @xmath167 , from eq . ( [ e.solcondition ] ) it follows that a factorized ground state exists if @xmath168 . analogous conditions are obtained for the other types of magnetic orders compatible with full ground state separability . the results are summarized in fig . [ f.factor ] , where @xmath169 is set assume positive values for reference . a very similar diagram of factorization holds in the case @xmath170 . and the coupling @xmath169 is set to be positive for reference . analogous results hold in the case @xmath170 . blank regions : no factorization allowed . rightmost ( yellow online ) shaded region : presence of a fully factorized ground state supporting an antiferromagnetic order along the @xmath69 direction . leftmost ( light blue online ) shaded region : fully factorized ground state with a ferromagnetic order along @xmath69 . bottommost ( light red online ) shaded region : fully factorized ground state with a ferromagnetic order along the @xmath71 direction . topmost ( light green online ) shaded region : fully factorized ground state with an antiferromagnetic order along @xmath71 . the solid line @xmath172 corresponds to models that exhibit saturation rather than true factorization ; the dashed line @xmath173 accommodates for models with unresolved superpositions of two fully factorized ground states each one supporting a different magnetic order . either one of the two possible ground states is then `` chosen '' by the system depending on the way the symmetry is broken , see text for further details . all plotted quantities are dimensionless.,width=321 ] as one can see from fig . [ f.factor ] , the type of magnetic order corresponding to the factorized ground state determines four different regions in the space of the hamiltonian parameters ( one for each different ordering ) associated to the existence of a factorized ground state . the four different domains of the interaction parameters are separated by two bisectrices that individuate special cases . the line @xmath172 is constituted by the set of points in which saturation occurs in place of genuine factorization ( see subsec . [ s.sec.saturation ] ) . on the other hand , the line @xmath174 , corresponds to models that , for a given value of the factorizing field @xmath63 and of the e - squo orientation @xmath86 , admit two degenerate , but distinct factorized states . the choice of the ground state is then determined by the usual mechanisms of symmetry breaking : if an infinitesimal magnetic field is applied in the @xmath55 plane , the axis of magnetic alignment in the ground state is determined by the order in which the two limits @xmath175 and @xmath176 are realized . it is important to observe that all the shaded regions of fig . [ f.factor ] correspond to exact analytical ground - state solutions of the investigated short - range models , which are , in general , non - exactly solvable . the exact , fully factorized ground states are tensor products of the form reported in the fourth column of tab . [ t.summary ] , in which the value of the orientation parameter @xmath86 of the e - squo is retrieved by solving the equation in the second column of tab . [ t.summary ] . obviously , such an exact solution holds only at the factorizing field @xmath101 . in the case of antiferromagnetic order either along the @xmath69 or the @xmath71 direction , the latter is given by ( see tab . [ t.summary ] ) @xmath177 while in the case of a ferromagnetic phase , again unrespectfully if along @xmath69 or along @xmath71 , it reads @xmath178 given that the ground state is known exactly at the factorization point , all the relevant physical observables can be evaluated straightforwardly . for instance , the ground state energy density at factorization reads @xmath179 in the presence of an antiferromagnetic ordering , while in the ferromagnetic case it is @xmath180 both the factorizing field and the ground state energy , unlike the e - squo orientation @xmath86 and the expression of the factorized ground states , are functions of the number of nearest neighbors per site ( the coordination number @xmath181 , where the index @xmath182 denotes the nearest - neighbor range of the interactions ) . hence , they depend on the geometry and the spatial dimension of the lattice . to begin with , let us consider one - dimensional lattices ( spin chains , @xmath183 ) , for which the coordination number @xmath184 . substituting this value in the previous equations , we immediately recover , among others , the value of the factorizing field and the ground state energy obtained analytically by kurmann _ et al . _ for the @xmath1 spin chain using the direct method @xcite . et al . _ had to restrict their investigation to coupling constants @xmath185 taking values in the interval @xmath21 $ ] , thus establishing ground state factorization only in a restricted set of conditions . instead , the general method allows to assess the occurrence of factorized ground states associated to different types of magnetic orderings in the entire region of the hamiltonian parameters . one of the most important advantages of the general method is that it is easily applicable irrespective of the spatial dimensionality , while the direct method becomes increasingly difficult to apply with growing spatial dimensions of the lattice . numerical techniques can overcome some of the limits of the direct method , although they fall short of the power and extension of the general analytic method . the most important numerical result has been obtained by applying quantum monte carlo techniques to the study of the @xmath1 model in @xmath186 space dimensions ( square lattice ) @xcite . applying the present method to the @xmath1 model on the square lattice allows not only to immediately reobtain analytically the previous numerical findings , but also , again , to extend the investigation to the entire space of the hamiltonian parameters by simply taking into account that for the square lattice @xmath187 . moreover , the flexibility of the general method allows to include in the analysis different planar models . for instance , considering models defined on planar hexagonal lattices , the previous analysis needs to be modified only in that the value of the coordination number , in this case is @xmath188 . let us now move to @xmath189 and investigate ground state factorization in nearest - neighbor @xmath1 models on three - dimensional regular lattices , for which there were so far no results ( apart the preliminary ones obtained in our previous work @xcite ) either analytic or numerical ( such a task would be extremely demanding if approached either via the direct method or via numerical techniques ) . resorting to the general method , we can instead fully characterize the factorized ground state and the associated physical quantities just by entering the correct value of the coordination number , e.g. @xmath190 for a simple cubic lattice . obviously , the results extend straightforwardly also for models defined on lattices of arbitrary higher dimension @xmath191 . the analytic method can be applied with minor complications to models with interactions of longer spatial range . as already mentioned in sec . [ sec.method ] , concerning ground state factorization , the main difference between models with short- and finite - range interactions is that for the latter there exist more than one equation in the set ( [ e.solcondition ] ) . each of these equations is associated to a different value of the range @xmath127 , where @xmath125 is the maximum interaction range , that is the maximum distance between two directly interacting spins : all the couplings vanish for pairs of spins with inter - spin distance greater or equal to @xmath192 . clearly , the fact that all the equations have to be solved simultaneously yields tighter conditions on factorizability compared to the case of models with nearest - neighbor interactions . namely , it is not sufficient that the r.h.s . of each eq . ( [ e.solcondition ] ) takes values in the interval @xmath21 $ ] . it is also necessary to require that all these values coincide . this constraint yields a set of further conditions that must be satisfied by all the nonvanishing couplings . for instance , let us suppose that the system is in an antiferromagnetic ordered phase along the @xmath69 direction . labeling by @xmath193 the value of @xmath131 and imposing that for every @xmath49 the r.h.s . of eqs.([e.solcondition ] ) must equate @xmath193 , we find that @xmath194 where , to ensure the absence of frustration , @xmath195 must obey the following inequality : @xmath196 . analogously , for an antiferromagnetic order along @xmath71 : @xmath197 and to exclude frustration we must also have that @xmath198 . in the presence of a ferromagnetic phase , respectively for an ordering along @xmath69 and along @xmath71 , the constraints and the no - frustration condition become @xmath199 eqs . ( [ e.exe.cantix][e.exe.cferroy ] ) generalize the instance analyzed in ref . @xcite , in which we limited the analysis to the case of vanishing @xmath169 that , according to eqs . ( [ e.exe.cantix][e.exe.cferroy ] ) , implies @xmath200 for all @xmath127 . especially in the presence of a ferromagnetic order in the lattice , eqs.([e.exe.cferrox][e.exe.cferroy ] ) allow us to simplify the expressions of both the factorizing field and the energy per site . namely , taking into account the definition of the ferromagnetic net interactions eq . ( [ e.netinteractions ] ) and the expression of the factorizing field in the presence of a ferromagnetic order ( see tab . [ t.summary ] ) , we have @xmath201 respectively for an order along the @xmath69 and the @xmath71 directions . similarly , for the energy density we obtain @xmath202 we now discuss a specific example ( out of many possible ones ) which demonstrates the power of the analytic method in conditions where the more conventional direct approach based on the factorized ansatz of refs . @xcite is completely ineffective without the supplement of a remarkable intuition in guessing the correct forms of the possible factorized ground states . let us consider a @xmath1-type spin model defined on a spatially isotropic cubic lattice of arbitrary size , possessing nearest - neighbor and next - nearest - neighbor interactions , and admitting arbitrarily different couplings along the @xmath69 , @xmath71 , and @xmath45 directions . the coordination numbers associated to the two types of interaction can be straightforwardly computed from the geometry of the problem and are @xmath190 and @xmath203 . suppose the model is deduced from an explicit experimental realization of a spin lattice and we are provided with explicit values of the various interaction strengths . for example , @xmath204 . the application of our `` on - demand '' ground - state factorization search engine is now immediate . from eq . ( [ fourcases ] ) we have that the candidate factorized state must possess antiferromagnetic order along the @xmath69 direction . therefore the general conditions for the existence of a factorization point , as determined by eq . ( [ e.solcondition ] ) , can be summarized as follows @xmath205 this condition must hold together with the frustration - free constraint . it is readily verified that @xmath206 provides a solution to the combined set of necessary and sufficient conditions for ground state factorization . therefore if the experimentalist tunes the external field @xmath44 at the factorizing value @xmath207 , obtained from eq . ( [ e.factorizingfield ] ) , the engineered cubic spin lattice system will relax in a completely factorized ground state of the form given in table [ t.summary ] ( second row , last column ) with @xmath208 . many other applications can be considered to models with arbitrary spin - spin interactions of longer range , and they can be treated with the same simplicity within the framework of the general analytic method . for instance , a very interesting example of a model with infinite - range interactions will be treated in the next section . however , before moving to the study of this case , we should comment on the important issue of the interplay between factorization and frustration in quantum spin systems with multiple spatial scales of interaction . the investigation of general models including many interaction terms of different spatial ranges needs to be carried out with particular care , because the interplay between the different interactions can lead in general to important effects of frustration that tend to suppress the occurrence of ground state factorization . the very delicate and tricky nature of the problem is at the origin of a recent incorrect prediction about the existence of factorized ground states in one - dimensional @xmath1 models on finite rings with long - range interactions , obtained exploiting the direct method @xcite . in ref . @xcite the author , resorting to the direct method , concludes that all the factorized energy eigenstates in one - dimensional long - range @xmath1 models , with interaction terms of spatial ranges that are in integer ratio with the total number of sites , are also the states of lowest energy . however , the proof of this statement obtained using only the direct method requires that there must be no frustration in the system @xcite . unfortunately , the interplay between the interactions of different spatial range can in general introduce frustration effects ( e.g. in the case of antiferromagnetic nearest - neighbor and next - to - nearest neighbor interactions , and so on ) . the existence of these effects nullifies all proofs , based on the direct method , of the existence of fully separable ground states . in fact , immediate counterexamples can be given of fully factorized energy eigenstates that are not ground states . let us consider for instance an @xmath209 model on a finite ring of six spins with nearest - neighbor and next - to - nearest - neighbor antiferromagnetic interactions , and @xmath210 . following ref . @xcite , this model should admit a factorized ground state . in fact , a factorized energy eigenstate with antiferromagnetic order does indeed exist , with an energy @xmath211 . however , solving the model by exact diagonalization yields that the lowest energy is @xmath212 and that the associated ground state is entangled . essentially the same type of counterarguments nullifies a recent claim that the factorized energy eigenstates are the factorized ground states of mixed - spin models of ferrimagnetism of the @xmath1 type @xcite . a general analysis of ground state factorization in ferrimagnetic models with mixed spin-@xmath0-spin-@xmath182 interactions will be presented elsewhere @xcite , based on a proper extension of the formalism of squos to include spin-@xmath182 systems , as sketched in the final part of ref . @xcite . in conclusion , the study of factorization in quantum spin models with many different finite- and long - range interaction terms requires a very careful analysis and the use of the general analytic method whenever frustration effects are present . a rigorous and systematic study of the crucial ( and subtle ) interplay between frustration and factorization in quantum spin systems will be the subject of a forthcoming paper @xcite . a very interesting limit of the cases analyzed in subsec . [ sec.long ] is given by models with infinite range interactions , such as the fully connected or lipkin - meshkov - glick ( lmg ) model @xcite , extensively studied in condensed matter physics @xcite , which is described by the following hamiltonian @xmath213 with @xmath214 . the pre - factor @xmath215 ( with @xmath2 denoting the total number of spins ) ensures the linear divergence of the ground state energy as @xmath2 increases . let us remark that normalizing the interaction part of the lipkin - meshkov - glick hamiltonian requires some care : being a connected interaction , it scales as @xmath216 , i.e. as the product of the total number of spins and the number of pairs of spins . therefore , to ensure that the interaction energy is extensive , i.e. scales with @xmath2 , the interaction part of the hamiltonian must be normalized by @xmath29 . usually , for calculational ease , the interaction part is normalized by @xmath2 , so that it scales as @xmath29 . using this convention is strictly speaking incorrect , but is clearly harmless for large @xmath2 and in the thermodynamic limit . for instance , concerning the separability of the ground state , it introduces a slight , spurious @xmath2-dependence of the factorization point through the multiplicative factor @xmath217 , and the error vanishes in the thermodynamic limit . however , on fundamental physical grounds , the factorization points of translationally invariant systems , if they exist , must be independent of the size of the system , and must take the same value both at finite @xmath2 and in the thermodynamic limit . applying the kurmann - thomas - mller factorized ansatz @xcite and the @xmath218 normalization , dusuel and vidal obtained an analytic expression of the factorizing field for the lmg model that is @xmath2-dependent through the multiplicative factor @xmath217 @xcite . although defined according to an anomalous convention , this result is essentially exact in the limit of large @xmath2 . we first observe that the lmg model in eq . ( [ e.exe.hlmg ] ) can be obtained as the limiting case of a generic model described by eq . ( [ e.hamiltonian ] ) assuming that the range of interactions diverges ( i.e @xmath219 ) while the individual strengths become independent of the distance ( @xmath220 ) , scale with @xmath2 ( @xmath221 ) , and vanish along the @xmath45-direction ( @xmath222 ) . therefore , assuming @xmath223 , @xmath224 and @xmath222 in eq . ( [ e.hamiltonian ] ) we recover eq . ( [ e.exe.hlmg ] ) . because of the sign of the interactions and of the range of values that can be assumed by @xmath225 , we immediately obtain that the energy per site ( [ e.energy ] ) is minimized by a state possessing ferromagnetic order along the @xmath69 direction . moreover , taking into account that the coupling strengths are proportional to the ratio @xmath218 , we have that the net interactions converge to finite values in the thermodynamic limit : @xmath226 , @xmath227 . it is then rather straightforward to apply the analytic method to the lmg model and hence prove , exactly , that the ground state is fully factorized at the factorizing field @xmath228 , which is , correctly , independent of @xmath2 . the form of the fully separable ground state is the tensor product of local states of the form @xmath229 with @xmath230 and the energy density reads @xmath231 . these results are in agreement with those obtained , using the direct method , by dusuel and vidal @xcite , modulo a proper normalization factor . the versatility and generality of the analytic method can be demonstrated further by considering extensions of the translationally - invariant models discussed in the previous sections . in fact , till now , we have always considered systems in which the coupling amplitudes depend only on the distance between the spins involved . in the present subsection we shall focus instead on models which contemplate the possibility of spatial anisotropies , i.e. given the spin @xmath232 associated to site @xmath40 , the interaction coupling with spin @xmath233 associated to site @xmath109 depends not only on the distance @xmath234 but also on the location of site @xmath109 relative to site @xmath40 . to simplify the notations , the physical analysis , and the number of possible cases that need to be considered , we limit ourselves to models with short - range interactions , i.e. with all the couplings vanishing for @xmath235 . we will comment briefly on general models with spatial anisotropies and interactions of arbitrary range at the end of this section . let us assume that for each site @xmath40 the total number of nearest neighbors is @xmath236 , where @xmath237 is the number of nearest neighbors whose coupling strength with @xmath232 takes a certain value @xmath238 , and @xmath239 is the number of nearest neighbors whose coupling with @xmath232 is given by a different value @xmath240 . obviously , we could consider situations more complicated at will , with an arbitrary number of @xmath241 different types of nearest neighbors . for the given example , the system hamiltonian reads @xmath242 , \nonumber \\\end{aligned}\ ] ] where the index @xmath243 runs over the first @xmath237 nearest neighbors , and the index @xmath244 runs over the remaining @xmath239 nearest neighbors for each spin @xmath232 . according to the different values of @xmath237 and @xmath239 this hamiltonian describes various possible models . for instance , if @xmath245 and @xmath246 eq . ( [ e.exe.hamiltonian.anis ] ) describes @xmath1 models on ladders constituted by two coupled linear chains ; the case @xmath247 and @xmath246 corresponds to models defined on two coupled square lattices . in both cases , every spin in each chain ( plane ) , besides the usual interactions within a single chain ( plane ) involving @xmath237 nearest neighbors , is also coupled to @xmath239 companion spins located on the second chain ( plane ) . the instance @xmath248 corresponds to a @xmath1-type model defined on a linear chain with nearest - neighbor interactions of alternating strengths . the factorization properties of this latter model have been studied by g. l. giorgi in the limit @xmath249 that , belonging to the @xmath209 symmetry class , can be solved exactly @xcite . as we have seen in sec . [ sec.method ] , the first step of the method is to single out the magnetic order that minimizes the energy associated to the candidate factorized ground state , at fixed magnetization along the @xmath45 direction ( the direction of the external field ) . provided there are no effects of frustration , in the present case we obtain that every possible hypothetical factorized ground state can assume one of eight different magnetic orders . these eight possibilities stem from the four possible orders of eq . ( [ fourcases ] ) , that the system can support when the effects of @xmath240 can be neglected , duplicated according to the two possible arrangements , parallel or antiparallel , induced by the interactions associated to @xmath240 . the four possible orderings along a single direction are represented in fig . [ f.disegno ] for a model of two transversally coupled one - dimensional spin chains . or @xmath71 ) characterizing the candidate factorized ground states of models with spatially anisotropic interactions . the case considered corresponds to a ladder of two coupled one - dimensional spin chains with coordination numbers @xmath245 and @xmath246 . topmost row : parallel ( a ) and antiparallel ( b ) ferromagnetic order . bottommost row : parallel ( c ) and antiparallel ( d ) antiferromagnetic order.,width=321 ] by imposing the minimization of the energy per site , eq . ( [ e.energy ] ) , the kind of order actually present in the ground state can be determined comparing the antiferromagnetic and ferromagnetic net interactions along the @xmath69 and @xmath71 axes , defined as @xmath250 where the @xmath84 sign discriminates between parallel / antiparallel ordering with respect to @xmath251 . as a function of the net interactions , the type of magnetic order present in the system is determined by the value of the minimum , i.e. of @xmath252 . accordingly , we have the following correspondences : @xmath253 obviously , also in the presence of spatial anisotropies we may observe that , in terms of the net interactions , the fact that in the system there is no frustration ( and especially no frustration arising from the spatial anisotropies ) implies that latexmath:[$\mu = - z_1^{(1 ) } according to which axis is characterized by the given magnetic order . without loss of generality , let us consider the situation in which the system realizes a parallel antiferromagnetic order along the @xmath69 direction , see fig . [ f.disegno](c ) . all other cases can be treated analogously . following once again the steps described in sec . [ sec.method ] , and in complete analogy with eq . ( [ e.condition ] ) , it is possible to derive the set of conditions that the orientation @xmath86 of the e - squo must satisfy simultaneously in order for the system to admit a factorized energy eigenstate : @xmath255 for the two conditions to be satisfied simultaneously the two r.h.s . must coincide and must assume values in the interval @xmath21 $ ] . hence , by equating them it is possible to derive an equation that plays the same role of eqs . ( [ e.exe.cantix][e.exe.cferroy ] ) . in the hypothesis that the model under investigation satisfies both eqs . ( [ e.exe.theta.anis.1][e.exe.theta.anis.2 ] ) , what is left to prove is that the associated factorized state be indeed the ground state . following the route illustrated in sec . [ sec.method ] it is not difficult to verify that the following inequalities must hold : @xmath256 it is straightforward to establish that they are both satisfied , provided there are no frustration effects . namely , for spins interacting via couplings of the first kind @xmath238 ( referring to fig . [ f.disegno ] , these are the intra - chain interactions ) , the second of eqs . ( [ e.exe.suffcondition.anis.1 ] ) yields that the denominator in the r.h.s . of eq . ( [ e.exe.theta.anis.1 ] ) is non - negative and , therefore , the corresponding numerator must be non - negative and not exceeding the denominator . hence , we obtain @xmath257 . on the other hand , from the first of eqs . ( [ e.exe.suffcondition.anis.1 ] ) it follows that @xmath258 which , in turn , implies @xmath259 . the latter relation is in agreement with the hypothesis of absence of frustration . furthermore , for pairs of neighboring spins interacting with a coupling of the second kind @xmath240 ( referring to fig . [ f.disegno ] , these are the inter - chain interactions ) , the second of eqs . ( [ e.exe.suffcondition.anis.2 ] ) yields that the denominator in the r.h.s . of eq . ( [ e.exe.theta.anis.2 ] ) must be non - positive . hence , also the corresponding numerator must be non - positive and therefore @xmath260 . simultaneously , the first of eqs . ( [ e.exe.suffcondition.anis.2 ] ) implies @xmath261 and therefore @xmath262 , again in complete agreement with the hypothesis of absence of frustration . collecting all these results we can conclude that in the absence of frustration , if a system described by the model hamiltonian eq . ( [ e.exe.hamiltonian.anis ] ) satisfies simultaneously all conditions in eqs.([e.exe.theta.anis.1][e.exe.theta.anis.2 ] ) , there exist a factorizing field @xmath63 at which the ground state is fully factorized and characterized by a parallel antiferromagnetic order along @xmath69 . the factorizing field is determined according to the procedure described in sec . [ sec.method ] , and it is not difficult to verify that it reads : @xmath263 the exact form of the factorized ground state reads @xmath264 in eq . ( [ e.antiferroparrallelolungox ] ) , the superscript `` @xmath265 '' ( `` @xmath266 '' ) denotes the upper ( lower ) chain of the ladder model considered in fig . [ f.disegno](c ) . we observe that @xmath267 does not depend on the choice of the chain , implying that the two generic @xmath4-th spins in both legs of the ladder are in the same state equipped with an antiferromagnetic order with respect to the nearest neighbor sites along the corresponding chain . analogous results hold , with the appropriate trivial modifications , when considering the other possible magnetic orders compatible with factorization ( see eq . ( [ e.exe.eightcases ] ) ) . the present work has been motivated both by the need for exact solutions to complex many - body quantum spin models , in particular by the question `` when is a mean - field solution exact ? '' , and by the necessity to acquire improved knowledge and control on the structure of quantum correlations for potential technological applications of spin systems . we have introduced a simple and rather powerful all - analytic general method to determine the conditions for the existence and the properties of fully factorized ( fully separable ) ground states in translationally invariant quantum spin models with general two - body exchange interactions and subject to external fields . the theory developed in the present paper builds on and extends the scheme originally introduced in ref . it provides a readily useful procedure to establish , in terms of the hamiltonian parameters , whether the ground state is entangled or completely factorized and , in the latter case , what is the exact form of the state , the expression of the ground - state energy and of the magnetic observables , and the type of ordered phase ( magnetic order ) compatible with factorization . the task is achieved by exploiting tools imported from quantum information theory such as the formalism of single - qubit unitary operations introduced in refs . @xcite and the corresponding entanglement excitation energies , whose property of vanishing if and only if a quantum ground state is totally factorized plays a central role in the analysis of ground - state separability . using these tools we have completed the program initiated in ref . @xcite by determining a general set of exact relations and inequalities that , for frustration - free systems , allow to establish rigorously the occurrence of all types of possible factorized ground states . we have applied the analytic method to spin-@xmath0 models with general heisenberg - like exchange interactions of arbitrary range ( short , finite , long ) , either isotropic or anisotropic , defined on regular lattices of arbitrary dimensions . the method is insensitive to the size of the system and applies rigorously in the thermodynamic limit as well as for finite lattices . the method allows to establish novel exact , fully factorized ground state solutions of generally non exactly solvable models , corresponding to nontrivial sets of values of the hamiltonian parameters . key results include , for instance , the rather straightforward determination of the existence and form of factorized ground states in @xmath1-type models with different types of short - range and long - range interactions on cubic lattices , a task that would be of formidable complexity if tackled with numerical techniques or resorting to the simple - minded direct method based on the product ansatz . the complete factorization diagram for nearest - neighbor heisenberg - like anisotropic models might be particularly useful for those technological implementations which employ spin systems as information processors exploiting their ground state entanglement @xcite . we have provided in fig . [ f.factor ] a `` minefield '' map of the unentangled working points that need to be avoided , when engineering the couplings and tuning the external fields , in order to achieve satisfactory quantum transmission performances . on the other hand , there are also alternative tasks in quantum information which instead require as initial working points factorized states , e.g. for engineering , via suitable dynamics , specific classes of long - distance entangled states useful for quantum state transfer and quantum teleportation @xcite or the instantaneous creation of strongly entangled graphs or cluster states involving a mesoscopic or macroscopic number of spins for one - way quantum computation @xcite : in these instances the minefield may turn into a treasure map . the analysis of ground - state factorization would be particularly useful in the study of quantum spin models on open - end lattices . such systems are not translationally invariant , and therefore the analytic method requires to be suitably extended to this type of instances . this generalization is under way and should be in reach in the near future . notably , according to a general theorem by kurmann , thomas , and mller on factorization @xcite , given any hamiltonian of the form eq . ( [ e.hamiltonian ] ) involving higher spins @xmath268 , the ground state of that spin-@xmath269 system is fully factorized at the same value of the external field @xmath101 eq . ( [ e.factorizingfield ] ) , at which factorization occurs in the corresponding spin-@xmath0 model . therefore , the method and the results derived in the present paper have a much wider scope of application and can be straightforwardly generalized to interacting systems with arbitrarily high values of the spin , provided they are of the same hamiltonian structure as in the spin-@xmath0 case . absence of frustration effects , either of geometric or dynamical nature , has been essential to the theoretical scheme derived in the present work . for instance , we have determined the factorization diagram for specific examples of frustration - free systems endowed with isotropic interaction terms of different spatial ranges , and for systems with nearest - neighbor anisotropic interactions . however , it is clear that there are many extremely interesting instances of more complex systems that would in general be subject to frustration effects . continuing a step - by - step strategy of applying the general method to models of increasing complexity , natural further stages of investigation would include models subject to frustration , e.g. , models on linear chains with competing isotropic interactions of different range such as a 1-d @xmath1-type model with nearest - neighbor ferromagnetic interactions and next - to - nearest neighbor antiferromagnetic interactions . increasing further the degree of complexity , one could then consider models with competing anisotropic interactions of different ranges , that according to the type of anisotropy could be subject to both geometrically- and dynamically - induced frustrations . when considering frustrated models , except for very special cases , even when the considered system admits a fully factorized state as an energy eigenstate , the set of conditions derived in the present work are not sufficient to establish that such an eigenstate is indeed the ground state of the system . in fact , a competition arises between factorization , which requires a magnetic ordering , and frustration , which tends to destroy magnetic orders , ultimately leading to a chaotic correlating behavior . the latter unavoidably tends to enhance ground - state entanglement , thus suppressing the occurrence of situations where the most favorable state , in terms of energy content , is completely uncorrelated . in such cases , a naive application of the direct method based on the factorized ansatz , for instance to models including anisotropic interaction terms of different magnetic types on many different spatial scales ( or even on all scales ) , leads unavoidably to overestimate the factorizing effect of the balancing between interactions and external fields and thus to badly incorrect predictions on the occurrence of fully factorized ground states in these classes of models , as done , unfortunately , in the second part of ref . @xcite . in a forthcoming work @xcite we will present a systematic and thorough study of some important classes of frustrated quantum spin models in order to establish the conditions for the occurrence of true ground state factorization and to characterize it in terms of compatibility thresholds with frustration . an intriguing issue that arises in connection with frustration is the relationship between factorization and the existence of ordered phases . for frustration - free hamiltonian systems that conserve the even - odd parity , spontaneous symmetry breaking and the existence of an ordered phase are necessary conditions for ground state factorization , because factorized states have no definite parity . however , in the presence of frustration there may exist factorized energy eigenstates without ground state factorization . it would then be very interesting to understand whether in these situations there is still a causal relation between factorization and the existence of phase transitions in the system . factorization might then be used as an heuristic tool to gain insight in the phase diagram of frustrated quantum systems . it would also be important to understand whether chiral interactions can enhance factorization beyond the limits imposed by the presence of frustration effects . in fact , since factorization can be seen as `` mean field becoming exact '' , it seems to require quite naturally a balancing between interactions and external fields as the only possibility for its occurrence . however , one can not exclude , in principle , that other mechanisms might lead to the same effect without requiring the presence of external driving fields . future investigations will be concerned with the application of the analytic method to the determination of the spectrum of factorization , that is the study of the occurrence of factorized excited states in different classes of quantum spin hamiltonians , and the implications of factorization diagrams on the structural and informational properties of quantum spin models for potential applications in quantum technology . we acknowledge cnr - infm research and development center `` coherentia '' , infn , and isi foundation for financial support . one of us ( f.i . ) , would like to thank ylenia dautilia for invaluable exchanges . in sec . [ sec.method ] we have determined the general conditions for ground state factorization by selecting as candidate factorized ground states only those characterized by a ferromagnetic or antiferromagnetic order along the @xmath69 or @xmath71 directions depending on the value of the minimum value @xmath270 in the set of the net interactions [ see eq . ( [ fourcases ] ) ] , and neglecting all other possible magnetic arrangements . in the following , we will prove that indeed , given any spin hamiltonian of the type eq . ( [ e.hamiltonian ] ) , if a factorized ground state exists , then it is characterized by one of the four above - mentioned magnetic orders . let us consider the most general factorized state compatible with the constraint of a site - independent magnetization @xmath51 : @xmath271 where the local spin state @xmath272 is eigenstate of @xmath273 with eigenvalue equal to @xmath0 . let us suppose that there exists an hamiltonian of the type eq . ( [ e.hamiltonian ] ) that admits , for some particular value of the external field @xmath101 , the state in eq . ( [ e.candidate.gen ] ) as an eigenstate . under these hypotheses we must have that the projection of the factorized eigenstate onto the four - dimensional hilbert space of a pair of spins in the lattice must be an eigenstate of the pair - hamiltonian term @xmath102 defined as in eq . ( [ e.couple ] ) . following the same strategy as in sec . [ sec.method ] let us introduce for each site @xmath274 a set of three auxiliary mutually orthogonal spin operators among which one , that we name @xmath123 , coincides with @xmath275 : @xmath276 by inverting eqs . ( [ e.axayaz.gen ] ) , we can conveniently re - express the conventional single - spin operators as functions of the new set of operators @xmath113 : @xmath277 substituting eq . ( [ e.sxsysz.gen ] ) into the pair hamiltonian we obtain the expression for @xmath115 at factorization as a function of the sets of operators @xmath113 and @xmath116 , which reads @xmath278 -2 h_f^r \sin \theta \left [ { a_{\underline{i}}^x \left ( a_{\underline{j}}^z -\frac{1}{2}\right ) + \left ( a_{\underline{i}}^z-\frac{1}{2}\right ) a_{\underline{j}}^x } \right ] \nonumber \\ & & + a_{\underline{i}}^x a_{\underline{j}}^x \left ( j_z^r-2 h_f^r \cos \theta\right)+ a_{\underline{i}}^y a_{\underline{j}}^y \left ( j_x^r \sin\varphi_{\underline{i } } \sin \varphi_{\underline{j } } + j_y^r \cos \varphi_{\underline{i } } \cos \varphi_{\underline{j } } \right ) - h_f^r \cos \theta \left ( { a_{\underline{i}}^z + a_{\underline{j}}^z } \right ) \nonumber \\ & & + \left ( a_{\underline{i}}^z a_{\underline{j}}^y \cos \theta + a_{\underline{i}}^x a_{\underline{j}}^y \sin \theta \right)\left(-j_x^r \cos \varphi_{\underline{i } } \sin \varphi_{\underline{j}}+ j_y^r \sin \varphi_{\underline{i } } \cos \varphi_{\underline{j } } \right ) \\ & & + \left ( a_{\underline{i}}^y a_{\underline{j}}^z \cos \theta + a_{\underline{i}}^y a_{\underline{j}}^x \sin \theta \right)\left ( -j_x^r \sin \varphi_{\underline{i } } \cos \varphi_{\underline{j}}+ j_y^r \cos \varphi_{\underline{i } } \sin \varphi_{\underline{j } } \right ) \ , , \nonumber\end{aligned}\ ] ] > from eq . ( [ e.pairhij.gen ] ) , one has that to ensure that the projection of the factorized state onto the four - dimensional hilbert space of spins @xmath232 and @xmath233 is an eigenstate of the pair hamiltonian , it is necessary to require that the terms associated to the operators @xmath281 , @xmath282 , @xmath283 and @xmath284 vanish . this condition yields that @xmath285 solving eq . ( [ e.condition2.1.gen ] ) and eq . ( [ e.condition2.2.gen ] ) we obtain that if @xmath286 , then the phases @xmath287 obey to the following relations : @xmath288 with @xmath241 integer . it is immediate to verify that these relations are consistent only with a ferromagnetic or with an antiferromagnetic order along the @xmath69 or the @xmath71 direction . this concludes the proof . g. vidal , j. i. latorre , e. rico , and a. kitaev , phys . * 90 * , 227902 ( 2003 ) ; v. e. korepin , phys . lett . * 92 * , 096402 ( 2004 ) ; g. c. levine , phys . rev . lett . * 93 * , 266402 ( 2004 ) ; g. refael and j. e. moore , phys . 93 * , 260602 ( 2004 ) ; p. calabrese and j. cardy , j. stat . mech . * p06002 * ( 2004 ) ; m. b. plenio , j. eisert , j. dreiig , and m. cramer , phys . rev . lett . * 94 * , 060503 ( 2005 ) ; m. cramer , j. eisert , and m. b. plenio , phys . rev . lett . * 98 * , 220603 ( 2007 ) ; j. eisert , m. cramer , and m. b. plenio , arxiv:0808.3773 . g. vidal , phys . * 99 * , 220405 ( 2007 ) ; m. rizzi , s. montangero , and g. vidal , phys . rev . a * 77 * , 052328 ( 2008 ) ; v. giovannetti , s. montangero , and r. fazio , phys . rev . lett . * 101 * , 180503 ( 2008 ) . s. bose , phys . lett . * 91 * , 207901 ( 2003 ) ; m. christandl , n. datta , a. ekert , and a. j. landahl , phys . lett . * 92 * , 187902 ( 2004 ) ; d. burgarth and s. bose , phys . rev . a * 71 * , 052315 ( 2005 ) ; a. kay , phys . rev . a 73 , 032306 ( 2006 ) . y. makhlin , g. schn , and a. shnirman , rev . * 73 * , 357 ( 2001 ) ; v. giovannetti , s. lloyd , and l. maccone , science * 306 * , 1330 ( 2004 ) ; f. dellanno , s. de siena , and f. illuminati , phys . rep . * 428 * , 53 ( 2006 ) . m. j. hartmann , f. g. s. l. brando , and m. b. plenio , phys . . lett . * 99 * , 160501 ( 2007 ) ; d. g. angelakis , m. f. santos , and s. bose , phys . a 76 , 031805(r ) ( 2007 ) ; a. kay and d. g. angelakis , europhys . lett . * 84 * , 20001 ( 2008 ) . a. srensen and k. mlmer , phys . 83 * , 2274 ( 1999 ) ; a. b. kuklov and b. v. svistunov , phys . lett . * 90 * , 100401 ( 2003 ) ; l .- m . duan , e. demler , and m. d. lukin , phys . * 91 * , 090402 ( 2003 ) . Abstract:

Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.

Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered . Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video . Paper: recently there has been much progress in the study of synchronization of nonlinear maps @xcite and flows @xcite . this may lead to the clarification of the intelligence supposed to come from the synchronization among the neurons in the neural network , e.g.@xcite . especially the globally coupled map lattice ( gcml ) , a system of identical maps coupled via their mean field , has surprisingly rich clustering phases in the space of the nonlinearity parameter and the coupling . in the ordered two - cluster phase , gcml exhibits a posi - nega switch between clusters of synchronizing maps controlled by external inputs@xcite . furthermore even in the turbulent regime there emerges some hidden correlation which was first observed as the violation of the law of large numbers ( lln ) in the fluctuation of the mean field in the time series@xcite . gcml is a natural extension of the spin - glass models@xcite and these interesting features may be relevant to the intelligence activity . all the maps in gcml contribute to the mean field with an equal weight and hence there is no notion of distance between maps . it is conjectured that the intriguing properties of gclm , both the posi - nega switch and the hidden coherence , come from this bona fide scaling invariance of gcml@xcite . however , neither the reason why there occurs complete swapping of the maps between clusters in the posi - nega switch in the two - cluster phase nor the global feature of the turbulent phase has been elucidated so far . the purpose of this article is twofold . firstly , we revisit gcml . we show that there is a natural mechanism which guarantees the complete swapping of maps in the two - cluster posi - nega switch . the key to this mechanism is the motion of the mean field during the transient process . we show that even though whole maps are released from tightly synchronizing clusters to chaotic violent movements during the transient process , still they never mix across their mean field . we clarify the mechanism for this phenomenon . we also perform an extensive survey of the turbulent regime of gcml . we show that this regime has a prominent period three window and is full of periodicity remnants . a correlator analysis detects quasi - periodic clusters with high mixing rate among them almost everywhere in the turbulent regime of the large - size gcml . the so - called hidden coherence occurs in - between the regions of the quasi - clusters and the valleys with no violation of lln as the most modest appearance of the periodicity remnants . secondly , we construct a new extended globally coupled map lattice ( egcml ) . our egcml is a two - dimensional map lattice and the maps are under all - to - all interaction as in the gcml . but instead of the uniform interaction in gcml , the interaction in egcml obeys an inverse power law with respect to the distance between the maps on the lattice . egcml locates at an intermediate position between the nearest neighbor coupling map model and the gcml with uniform interaction . thus egcml facilitates a test whether the salient feature of gcml is due to the scale invariant interaction in it . we find that egcml indeed inherits the intriguing properties of gcml though they turn out diffuse to some extent . for instance , in the two - cluster phase of egcml , the two clusters follow the same bifurcation tree with that of gcml when the population unbalance between the clusters are increased but the synchronization of maps in each cluster is looser in egcml than in gcml . we also observe in the turbulent regime of the egcml the same periodic window as well as the quasi - periodic clusters with high mixing rate . gcml exhibits the basic posi - nega switch as well as more intricate controlled switches among coded clusters at various hierarchical levels in its simplest construction@xcite and certainly serves as a model for intelligence activity . but the very fact that it is a system of globally coupled maps with an equal coupling makes it lose the notion of the distance between maps . in a way it is a zero dimensional chaotic field theory . apart from the intelligence one is interested to know what is the ( classical ) field theory of chaotic maps on the lattice at criticality . in this aspect the synchronizing maps on the lattice may be regarded as the analog of higgs condensation in the field theory@xcite . we can use egcml to see the general trend how the spatial clustering of maps occurs under the scale invariant interaction on the lattice . we find that egcml does exhibit a self - organized formation of the spatial clusters ( condensation ) due to the synchronization between the maps during the chaotic transient process in the switch and after it . in the egcml switch the positive ( negative ) cluster becomes negative ( positive ) evolving in the same two - cluster attractor as before with only a few percent change of the population unbalance between the two clusters in most of the runs . however , there occurs the mixing of maps between the clusters . the organization of this article is as follows . in sec . ii we pay attention to two important rules in the gcml . these are the reciprocity of the couplings among the maps and an invariance rule that the maps do not change their mean field under the interaction . we then construct egcml based on these rules . in sec . iii we compare the phase diagrams of both models and show that they are almost the same each other . in sec . iv we analyze the two - cluster regime of both models . for the gcml we clarify how the basic posi - nega switch between two clusters in the two - cluster regime can be realized . we then turn to egcml and investigate the switch process in it . we show that amazing spatial clusters are formed during the chaotic transient process in the switch . in sec . v we present the results of an extensive statistical analysis over the whole turbulent regime of both gcml and egcml . we show that even in the turbulent regime the maps are under coherence with various manifestations of periodicity effect . we conclude in sec . vi . the coupled map lattice model in general is a system of one - dimensional field on a lattice @xmath1 with number of sites @xmath2 which evolves simultaneously by an iteration of the following two steps : @xmath3 in the first step all @xmath4 on the lattice ( called as map conventionally ) are simultaneously mapped by a nonlinear function @xmath5 . the function @xmath5 could be different site by site but we consider here the simplest case that @xmath5 is a simple logistic map @xmath6 common to all sites . in the second step the maps undergo interaction between themselves . the @xmath7 constant matrix @xmath8 represents the coupling between the maps at @xmath9 and @xmath10 on the lattice and the parameter @xmath11 is an overall coupling constant . thus the model in the simplest form has only two parameters , the nonlinear parameter @xmath12 and the coupling constant @xmath11 . if we rewrite ( [ generic ] ) in terms of @xmath13 , we obtain @xmath14 which is a familiar form in the neural network analysis @xcite . in gcml @xcite we consider n maps @xmath15 which evolve as @xmath16 where @xmath17 is the mean field on the lattice @xmath18 thus the coupling matrix of gcml is simply @xmath19 and clearly satisfies the reciprocity @xmath20 from ( [ global1 ] ) and ( [ global2 ] ) we can also derive a relation @xmath21 this relation guarantees that the mean field value is kept invariant when the maps undergo the interaction at the second step of the interaction . these two relations serve as a guide to construct the map lattice models in general . let us examine the implication of the invariance rule ( ii ) . the nonlinearity of @xmath5 generally magnifies the variance among the maps . therefore , the first step may be regarded as a _ defocusing lens _ with some _ random prisms _ installed in it . the larger the parameter @xmath12 is , the more strongly the defocusing lens acts on the system of maps . in the second step every @xmath22 is pulled to the mean field @xmath17 at a fixed rate @xmath23 . thus the second step acts as a _ focusing lens_. the larger the coupling @xmath11 is the more strongly the focusing lens acts . since ( [ global1 ] ) is a conformal contraction transformation the position of the _ center of mass _ @xmath17 of the system is kept invariant during the interaction . this is what the invariance condition ( ii ) implies . thanks to the invariance condition the fluctuation of the mean field of the maps is caused only at the first defocusing process . the maps in gcml evolve in time repeating this two - step process of defocusing and focusing . under the battle of the two conflicting tendencies the maps eventually form an attractor in which fluctuations among maps is maximally suppressed by the averaging effect of the interaction via the mean field . what is the condition on the coupling matrix @xmath24 for a general map model of the form ( [ generic ] ) satisfies the invariance condition ( ii ) ? by summing up ( [ generic ] ) over @xmath25 and using ( ii ) we obtain a relation @xmath26 at any step of the iteration this must hold . thus the necessary and sufficient condition on the coupling @xmath24 is @xmath27 from reciprocity ( i ) this is equivalent to @xmath28 this type of a model is known to show an interesting spatial cluster formation similar to the spin glass@xcite . on the other hand it is also known that the interesting two features of the gcml , i.e. the posi - nega switch and hidden coherence are lost . nonetheless it is instructive to check that this model satisfies ( i ) and ( ii ) like gcml . let us denote the sub - lattice of @xmath1 as @xmath29 which is a set of the nearest neighbor sites to @xmath25 including @xmath25 itself . the model is @xmath30 where @xmath17 is the mean field of the maps in @xmath29 at @xmath25 , i.e. @xmath31 the coupling matrix is then @xmath32 where @xmath33 is the number of maps in the sub - lattice @xmath34 in dimension @xmath35 . but if @xmath36 , then @xmath37 . hence @xmath38 and the condition ( i ) follows . also we have @xmath39 and ( ii ) follows . note that the interaction represents a diffusion process . for instance in @xmath40 we can rewrite ( [ ising1 ] ) and ( [ ising2 ] ) as @xmath41 and the second term is nothing but the laplacian on the one - dimensional lattice . we now wish to construct the following model . firstly it must have all to all interaction and satisfy the relations ( i ) and ( ii ) in order to have the same defocusing and focusing dynamics as in the gcml . secondly we wish to investigate the consequence of distance dependent interaction ; in particular , we wish to know to what extent the salient features of the gcml such as the posi - nega switch or the hidden coherence depend on the fact that the model is scale invariant trivially by the absence of distance scale . do these features disappear if the interaction between the maps decreases with distance ? certainly at the nearest interaction limit , we know neither the posi - nega switch nor the violation of the law of large numbers occurs . most crucial case is the interaction which decreases with distance but in a power law . in contrast to the exponential law this does not introduce the length scale and yet the interaction is all to all . thus the model we would like to construct is an extended gcml ( egcml ) in which the interaction decays with a power law and satisfies the conditions ( i ) and ( ii ) . below we show there is such a natural extension of gcml . in this article we choose @xmath42 for simplicity though our construction goes through for all dimensions . let us denote the set of sites at distance @xmath43 from @xmath25 as @xmath44 . the symbol @xmath45 is the memento of @xmath46 since in @xmath42 such a set is a loop ( in fact a square on the lattice space ) of radius @xmath43 around @xmath25 . we denote by @xmath47 the number of sites in @xmath48 . for @xmath42 , @xmath49 and @xmath50 . we denote the maximal radius of the loop realized in the lattice @xmath1 as @xmath51 . this is the perimeter of the lattice and for @xmath42 , @xmath52 $ ] . to be precise we present our result for @xmath53 odd but we have checked no change of results occurs for @xmath53 even . in order to treat all of the sites in @xmath1 democratically and to minimize the finite size effect we impose the periodic boundary conditions . for any point @xmath25 on the lattice we calculate the effect of all maps within @xmath51 taking into account the periodic boundary condition . the egcml is then compactly described as @xmath54 where @xmath55 at @xmath25 is given by @xmath56 in words the effect of all the maps on the lattice to the map at @xmath25 is determined by a double average . firstly any one of the maps at an equal distance @xmath43 from @xmath25 must affect the map at @xmath25 with the same weight . thus they are averaged with an equal weight and this gives @xmath57 . then , the effects of maps with various distances from @xmath25 must be accounted for . in the egcml this is done again by taking an equal weight average of @xmath57 over @xmath43 from zero to @xmath51 which gives @xmath55 as a natural non - local extension of the diffusion process . the first average must be an equal weight average to respect the rotational symmetry . the second average must be again an equal weight average . it is necessary for the invariance condition ( ii ) as we show below . the coupling matrix element @xmath24 is the weight factor for the @xmath58 to contribute to @xmath59 via the double average and is given by @xmath60 thus in egcml any map @xmath58 at equal distance @xmath43 from @xmath25 contributes with an equal weight to the mean field @xmath55 and the interaction decreases with an inverse power with respect to @xmath43 for @xmath42 . the reciprocity ( i ) follows just as in the nearest neighbor case since @xmath61 is equivalent to @xmath62 . also the invariance condition ( ii ) can be proved as : @xmath63 the gcml phase diagram in the @xmath64 plane given in @xcite is reproduced in fig . [ fig1]a to facilitate the comparison with the egcml phase diagram . for gcml we analyzed statistically the cluster composition of @xmath65 maps in the final attractor from 1000 random initial configurations and we verified the original phase diagram . the various phases are the outcome of the battle between chaotic motions of maps ( the defocusing effect ) and the interaction via the mean field forcing the maps to move coherently ( the focusing lens effect ) . since the gcml phase structure is elucidated in ref.@xcite we recapitulate here only the essential features necessarily in the following discussion . let us consider a line at @xmath66 for definiteness which is well - beyond the critical value @xmath67 of a single logistic map to the chaos@xcite . for a sufficiently large @xmath11 ( @xmath68 the maps in the final attractor are strongly bunched together in a cluster and evolve as a unity in the same chaotic motion as that of one single logistic map . this is the coherent phase . for @xmath11 in the range @xmath69 $ ] the interaction via the mean field can no longer exerts strong bunching and the final maps divide into two clusters . the maps in each cluster are still tightly synchronizing each other , while the two clusters mutually oscillate opposite in phase . this is as a solution of a minimum fluctuation in the mean field . we discuss this ordered two - cluster phase extensively in sec . iv . for smaller @xmath11 , the number of final clusters increases but the number of clusters at a given @xmath11 does not depend on the number of maps @xmath2 . the typical number of clusters at various @xmath11 ranges is indicated in the phase diagram . for further smaller @xmath11 ( @xmath70 ) the binding of the maps is almost resolved and the number of clusters is proportional to @xmath2 . this region is the turbulent phase and we extensively analyze this regime in sec . v. final remark is that the boundary values of @xmath11 between phases simultaneously increase ( decrease ) in order to maintain the balance between the conflicting tendencies if the coupling @xmath12 is increased ( decreased ) . we show in fig . [ fig1]b the corresponding phase diagram of the egcml . we used @xmath71 map lattice and analyzed statistically the final attractor configuration using typically 200 runs for each @xmath72 . for each map at the lattice site @xmath25 must be individually calculated using the inverse power law . for @xmath73 egcml , the necessary cpu time is about a hundred times of that for gcml of the same size . ] there is a remarkable agreement between two phase diagrams except for slight shifts in the phase boundaries . for instance , for the egcml at @xmath74 , the coherent phase , the ordered two - cluster phase , and the turbulent regime are respectively realized at @xmath75 , @xmath76 and @xmath77 to be compared with the boundaries quoted above . this agreement between two phase diagrams indicates strongly that egcml is in the same universality class@xcite with gcml . the ordered two - cluster phase of gcml is realized in a band in the @xmath79 parameter space with @xmath80 $ ] at @xmath81 and @xmath82 $ ] at @xmath83 ( see fig . [ fig1]a ) . in this phase , the maps divide into two clusters after some transient steps for most of the initial values . the clusters oscillate around the unstable fixed point @xmath84 mutually opposite in phase and the maps in each of the two clusters are in tight synchronization . in order to distinguish the two clusters we follow the convention in @xcite and name the cluster which takes a value above ( below ) @xmath84 at an even step @xmath85 from the first of the iteration as the positive ( negative ) cluster . we denote the number of maps in the positive ( negative ) cluster as @xmath86(@xmath87 ) and define the population ratio parameter @xmath88 . the values of maps in the positive ( negative ) cluster are uniformly @xmath89 if the synchronization of maps in each cluster is really tight . the maps are evolving in two clusters repeating the two step process of mapping and interaction and the dynamics of maps is reduced to that of two clusters : @xmath90 and the mean field of maps at time @xmath85 is given by @xmath91 where the second equality comes from the invariance condition ( ii ) for the two - cluster configuration . thus when a set of three numbers , @xmath12 , @xmath11 and @xmath78 is given the attractor of the two clusters is uniquely determined . for the discussion of the posi - nega switch below let us explain these by an explicit sample in fig . [ fig2 ] . in the left box we illustrate the mechanism of eqs . ( [ twocluster1 ] ) and ( [ twocluster2 ] ) and in the right box we show a sample attractor of two clusters realized at @xmath92 , @xmath93 and the corresponding motion of the mean field . the two clusters , represented by white and black circles , evolve in time under the iteration of mapping ( solid arrows ) and focusing by interaction ( dashed arrows ) . the mean field ( a short bar ) is kept invariant under the interaction as dictated by the invariance condition ( ii ) and ( [ twocluster2 ] ) . the first time @xmath94 in this run happened to be even . hence the positive cluster is the white circle moving as @xmath95 and the negative one is the black circle moving as @xmath96 . we see that they move in period four and mutually opposite in phase . the mean field is closer to the negative cluster , which means that the positive cluster is the minority cluster and @xmath78 must be less than half . numerically @xmath97 for this attractor . note that it is probabilistic whether the first time @xmath94 is even or odd . from another initial configuration the same attractor _ modulo translation in time _ may be equally realized . if the translation is odd steps in time we will have the same figure but with @xmath94 is now odd . the dominant cluster ( black circle ) must be then named as the positive cluster and @xmath98 by definition . in fig . [ fig3]a and b we show the attractors of gcml and egcml at @xmath92 and @xmath93 respectively as a function of @xmath78 . we used @xmath99 runs for gcml and @xmath100 runs for egcml . in one run for gcml , @xmath65 maps are iterated from a random initial configuration and to account for the first transient process the values of maps during the @xmath101 steps after the first @xmath102 iteration are plotted at the fraction of maps with @xmath103 . for instance the run shown in fig . [ fig2 ] with @xmath94 even contributes four points @xmath104 at @xmath97 and other four points @xmath105 at @xmath98 . then the run is repeated and the results of all runs are superposed in order to see the dependence of the attractor on the population unbalance between the clusters . note that this is equivalent to plot the maps only at the last even iteration steps at @xmath78 when the results from many initial configurations are superposed . the gcml attractor in fig . [ fig3]a agrees with that found in ref.@xcite . when @xmath78 approaches an upper threshold @xmath106 from below ( or a lower threshold @xmath107 from above ) the attractor undergoes successive period doubling and at the thresholds the maps fall into chaos ( @xmath106=@xmath108 and @xmath109 for @xmath92 ) . for egcml in fig . [ fig3]b the final attractor of @xmath110 maps is measured in a similar way but in order to shorten the large computing time necessary for egcml a routine is included in the iteration program which judges whether the maps have fallen into a periodic attractor of a certain period @xmath111 less than or equal to @xmath112 or not is calculated at every even step @xmath85 and when it stops to vary during ten successive steps the routine is activated at @xmath94 . it calculates the judgment condition @xmath113 and if this is satisfied for some @xmath114 the maps are judged to have fallen into an attractor of a period @xmath111 . if not , the routine is inactivated and the next stabilization of @xmath86 is waited for . ] . if the judgment condition is satisfied the maps are plotted at the fraction of maps with @xmath115 only during the next one cycle of the attractor and the next run is started . this not only shortens the calculation time but also enables the statistical analysis of the frequency of the occurrence of the attractors and of the fluctuation of maps in a given attractor since indefinitely duplicated plotting of the maps is avoided . if on the other hand the maps do not fall into an attractor all through the @xmath102 steps the maps are plotted for the next @xmath101 steps just as in the gcml run . in egcml we find that the maps in a cluster synchronize more loosely than those in gcml . the dispersion of maps in each cluster is approximately 0.1 for all @xmath78 to be compared with the gap size @xmath116 between the two bands of the attractor at @xmath117 . even though the maps do not mix between the clusters in the final stable attractor this fluctuation hides the details of bifurcation structure with respect to @xmath78 in a direct superposition of all runs in terms of the bitmap graphics . thus we have done a statistical analysis of the plot density and removed those points with density less than one percent of the maximum density from the diagram . this procedure is justified because we truncated each run just after one cycle of the periodic attractor so that each run contributes to the points on the attractor diagram with an equal weight . it was a remarkable instance in this work when we observed the same bifurcation diagram with gcml turned out in the central region of the egcml attractor ( @xmath118 $ ] ) as is shown in fig . [ fig3]b . in egcml the synchronization of maps in a cluster becomes looser than that of gcml but still the dynamics of final clusters is common for both gcml and egcml and controlled by @xmath78 . we have already seen above that egcml is endowed with a phase diagram remarkably similar to that of gcml and now we find that the attractors in both models in the ordered two - cluster regime are also similar . the posi - nega switch in gcml uses the ability of @xmath78 to control the attractor . but before delving into the detail discussion of the posi - nega switch let us examine to what extent the reduction of dynamics of maps is realized . if the reduction is really effective down to two degrees of freedom , all @xmath86(@xmath87 ) maps in the positive ( negative ) cluster should have a single value @xmath119 ( @xmath120 ) . then eqs . ( [ global1 ] ) and ( [ global2 ] ) should reduce to ( [ twocluster1 ] ) and ( [ twocluster2 ] ) or equivalently to a matrix coupled two - map model @xmath121 with @xmath122 and @xmath123 . from the remarkable agreement between gcml attractor ( fig . [ fig3]a ) and two - map model attractor ( fig . [ fig3]c ) we see that in the two - cluster phase of gcml the dynamics of the @xmath2 maps reduces to that of two maps for all @xmath78 between the thresholds . in egcml the coupling @xmath24 is not a single constant but it depends on the distance between @xmath25and @xmath124 . the interaction acts on a map at a site @xmath25 via the position dependent mean field @xmath55 which is a double sum given by ( [ tsm2 ] ) and ( [ tsm3 ] ) contrary to a single sum @xmath17 given by ( [ global2 ] ) in gcml . therefore the reduction of egcml to two maps we find in fig . 3b requires an explanation . what is important here is not the uniformness of the couplings but the scale invariance of them . in both gcml and egcml the interaction has no cutoff scale and hence it prevails over the lattice and the maps are forced to synchronize among themselves due to the averaging effect of the interaction via the mean field . thus the possible difference of egcml from gcml comes solely from the variation of the site dependent @xmath125 around @xmath17 . if the variation is small both models will show similar attractors . egcml is constructed in such a way to assure this small variance when the interaction forces the maps to synchronize . first let us consider a simple case where the nonlinear parameter @xmath12 is so small that the chaotic randomness in each map can not overcome the averaging effect . then after iterations all the maps on the lattice will synchronize and take approximately the same values with only a small variance . if we ignore this variance , the value @xmath22 common to all @xmath25 becomes a multiplicative factor to the sum for the mean field and @xmath126 follows from the invariance conditions ( [ unitaritygcml1 ] ) for gcml and ( [ unitarityegcml ] ) for egcml . in gcml the variance is negligible but in egcml the weaker synchronization causes a variance typically to the order @xmath127 in @xmath125 and the egcml attractor turns out reflecting this variance . but otherwise egcml behaves just like gcml . now in the two - cluster phase at higher @xmath12 the maps can not be bunched together in a single cluster and divide into two clusters , a and b. the maps in each of the clusters take approximately the same value and synchronize among themselves . hence we may write @xmath128 here @xmath129 ( @xmath130 ) is the collective coordinate for a ( b ) ( the average of maps taken over a ( b ) only ) and the @xmath131 ( @xmath132 ) represents small fluctuation around the @xmath133 ( @xmath130 ) . now let us analyze @xmath125 for egcml . an important observation is that the double sum for @xmath125 can be written as a sum of two double sums , one only over cluster a and the other only over cluster b. this decomposition allows one to apply the above argument to each of the clusters and the @xmath134 ( @xmath135 ) becomes a multiplicative factor to the double sum for cluster @xmath136 ( @xmath137 ) . as for the remaining double sum of couplings , some more consideration is necessary . in egcml a ` polarized ' distribution of maps is in principle allowed in which , for instance , the maps in the cluster @xmath136 ( @xmath137 ) accumulate around a given point @xmath25 and maps in cluster @xmath137 ( @xmath136 ) accumulate far from @xmath25 . but egcml has no interaction to induce such a polarization and the randomness in each map also acts to break the polarization . we have numerically checked the dominance of unpolarized distributions . therefore the remaining double sum for egcml again counts the number of maps in each cluster just in the same way the single sum for gcml does in ( [ twocluster2 ] ) . thus we have also in egcml @xmath138 here the approximation takes into account both the polarization in fluctuation and the small variance of maps in each cluster due to approximate synchronization . thus the collective coordinates @xmath133 and @xmath130 of the clusters is described by the matrix coupled two - map model and the maps in each of the clusters fluctuate around the collective coordinates . this explains the approximate reduction of egcml to two maps . the posi - nega switch found in gcml@xcite is based on the ability of @xmath78 as the control parameter of the gclm attractor . if maps are successively transported from one cluster to the other by input ( @xmath139 ) the population unbalance can be enhanced and the attractors undergo successive bifurcation . when @xmath78 reaches the threshold the whole maps go into a grand chaotic motion almost bunched together in a unit . see fig . [ fig4 ] for a typical sample of this transition . this state induced by an excess of the last one map is unstable as we see in fig . [ fig3]a that there is no self - organized stable attractor above @xmath106 ( or below @xmath140 ) . thus after some transient time the maps again form the allowed stable configuration , that is , tightly bound two clusters mutually oscillating opposite in phase . just as before let us again label the new cluster as positive if it takes a value above @xmath84 at even step @xmath85 ( counting from the start of iteration ) and the other as negative . an amazing finding in @xcite is that the composition of the new two clusters is limited only in two ways . ( 1 ) all the maps involved in the positive cluster before the chaotic transient are now involved in the negative cluster . ( 2 ) all the maps in the old positive cluster are again in the new positive cluster . the case ( 1 ) is the posi - nega switch . in both cases the maps behave as if they keep a _ memory _ of their former clusters . but how is it possible ? the maps pass the chaotic transient process where many two - cluster states as well as many other channels are open . what is the mechanism that protects the maps from mixing ? before answering this old puzzle let us point out some trivial aspects of the posi - nega switch . first there is no essential difference between case ( 1 ) and ( 2 ) . how long the chaotic transient process persists and in particular whether the duration time is even or odd is ( almost ) probabilistic . it is of course deterministic but highly dependent on the map values at the onset of the transient process . whether a cluster after the transition is positive or negative depend on the parity ( even or odd ) of the duration time by definition and there is no sense to distinguish ( 1 ) and ( 2 ) when the parity is indefinite . second we should note that in the two - cluster phase of gcml with fixed @xmath12 and @xmath11 the self - organized attractor is determined solely by the population unbalance between the two clusters . in case ( 1 ) @xmath141 and in case ( 2 ) @xmath142 . in either case , the population _ unbalance _ is the same before and after the transition and hence the attractor before and after must be the same . to be precise , to put the attractor before the transition upon that after the transition we need a temporal translation of odd steps in case ( 1 ) and even steps in case ( 2 ) . modulo this difference the attractor before and after the transition are the same in either case . there is no chance of appearance of a new attractor _ provided that _ the population _ unbalance _ before and after the transition is the same . therefore the real puzzle boils down to a single question . what is the mechanism which keeps the population unbalance between two clusters unchanged before and after the chaotic transient process ? we solve this puzzle below in two steps . first we discuss how the chaotic transient process starts and ends . this provides the temporal boundary conditions of the transient process . then we show there is a very simple mechanism which transfers the population unbalance rate through the transient process . the logistic map @xmath143 copies the region @xmath144 $ ] onto itself twice - fold as follows the limits are @xmath145 and the unstable fix point is @xmath146 but the argument here is independent of the particular parametrization of the map . all we need is the universal folding nature of the map . ] . i+ii+iii \nonumber \\ i & \equiv & [ -x_l , 0 ] \stackrel{f}{\longrightarrow } i+ii+iii \nonumber \\ ii&\equiv & [ 0 , x^ * ] \stackrel{f}{\longrightarrow } iii \\ iii&\equiv&[x^ * , x_l ] \stackrel{f}{\longrightarrow } ii+i ~. \nonumber \\ \end{aligned}\ ] ] the first two mappings are monotonously increasing while the last is monotonously decreasing . see fig . [ fig5 ] . below the threshold the two clusters are moving mutually opposite in phase around @xmath84 so that one must be in region iii and the other in region i or ii . when the unbalance is increased by sending the maps of the minority cluster to the majority cluster the mean field comes closer to the majority cluster and oscillates in phase with it . the interaction conformally contracts the maps to the mean field at every iteration step , and the minority cluster is pulled to the mean field more strongly at this highly unbalanced situation . in a few iterations after the unbalance exceeds the threshold by the last input , the non - dominant cluster crosses the boundary @xmath84 . this is the very time of the start of grand chaotic transient motion of maps . at the next step of iteration all maps must move into the same direction . the synchronization opposite in phase ceases and the maps start almost coherent evolution . the mean field evolves together in the middle of them . the focusing effect of the interaction now works only to bunch the maps close together around the mean field . the high nonlinearity of each map then becomes manifest and all maps move around the three regions bunched together in a pseudo - cluster with a slight variance around their mean field . in the typical sample run shown in fig . [ fig4 ] the mean field ( depicted by a short sold bar ) oscillates closely to the dominant cluster ( connected by the solid line ) for several steps . at time @xmath148 the minority cluster ( the dashed line ) is pulled down across the @xmath84 and at the next step both clusters are mapped upwards together . then the grand chaotic motion starts at @xmath149 . the pseudo - cluster is formed by the external input and is unstable . to bunch it stably the coupling must be larger ; it must have the value for the coherent region ( e.g. , @xmath150 for @xmath92 ) . the tiny variance between maps in the pseudo - cluster is soon magnified and the transient pseudo - cluster is broken to the self - organized stable two clusters again . in the following we use the fact that the maps starts and exits the transient process with small variance among them . let us define the relative coordinates @xmath151 with respect to the mean field @xmath152 since all of the maps are now close to the mean field we may expand @xmath153 as @xmath154 averaging this over @xmath155 using @xmath156 we obtain a relation @xmath157 but the interaction does not affect the mean field ( the condition ( ii ) ) . so we obtain @xmath158 therefore the evolution equation of the relative coordinates is given by @xmath159 we used ( [ averagerelation ] ) once more in order to derive the third line . the last line is crucial . the factor @xmath160 is common to all maps and in particular it acts with a common sign . thus at every step in the chaotic transient process the maps separated by the mean field never mix each other . this is the mechanism which keeps the population unbalance unchanged before and after the chaotic transient process . the sign of the factor at @xmath85 depends on the mean field value @xmath161 . hence case ( 1 ) and ( 2 ) may occur equally . we note that the invariance condition ( ii ) is used in proving the mechanism . this condition is really important to explore the model which shares the property of gcml . in the above resolution we examined the case in which the maps are confined in a pseudo - cluster and their variance around the mean field is kept small due to synchronization . numerically we can trace the motion of the pseudo - cluster . almost always the maps moves in a pseudo - cluster around the mean field with squared variance less than @xmath162 . but sometimes it intermittently splits into two or more tight clusters around the mean field . this does not invalidate above resolution . the danger of the mixing of members between clusters occurs only when they come close each other . our mechanism gives a guarantee that no mixing occurs even in such emergence . in fig . [ fig6]a we show a posi - nega switch in @xmath163 gcml ( @xmath164 ) . in the upper ( lower ) diagram the maps at the even ( odd ) iteration steps are plotted and connected by lines . a similar figure was given in the first report of the gcml switch@xcite but the evolution of maps only at the even iteration steps was presented . by such a diagram only it looks as though the attractor undergoes a transition to a new periodic attractor after the posi - nega switch . but as we noted above , the attractor before and after the switch is the same modulo temporal transport of odd steps . we can see clearly in fig . [ fig6]a the attractor on the whole , the even and odd iteration steps together , is precisely the same before and after the chaotic transition . as indicated by the arrows the switch from positive to negative is trivially a change in the count ( even or odd ) of iteration steps . what is not trivial is that the memory of the composition of two clusters is kept during the posi - nega switch . in fig . [ fig6]b we present a posi - nega switch event of @xmath165 gcml at even iteration steps only as a three - dimensional landscape plot . the peaks ( valleys ) before the chaotic transient process become the valleys ( peaks ) which is the posi - nega switch . in the transient process the maps form a surface which is chaotically oscillating but at any instance the segment of the surface looks remarkably horizontal . this shows that in the transient process the maps are in quasi - coherent motion with only a tiny variance . in fig . [ fig6]c we show a _ print circuit pattern _ of the same switch event only at even iteration steps distinguishing the maps with respect to the mean field value . those maps with ( @xmath166 ) are shown with white squares and the others by black squares . just as we proved above , the pattern clearly shows that there is no mixing of maps across the mean field all through the switch event . it can be also seen in fig . [ fig6]c that the transient process ceases when the last transferred map ( @xmath167 ) comes back to its home cluster . this is a typical way of the end of gcml switch . this completes our resolution of the posi - nega switch mechanism . the egcml has almost the same phase diagram with gcml as we showed in sec . iii and the attractor of egcml in the two - cluster phase has the same bifurcation tree structure with that of gcml . but as we showed in fig . [ fig3]b the attractor of egcml turns out with some variance . that is , the dynamics of clusters in egcml is reduced to that of matrix - coupled of two maps just as in gcml but the maps in each egcml cluster are in phase - synchronization rather than in tight synchronization in contrast to gcml . the all to all interaction with no cutoff scale in egcml is effective enough to maintain the reduction to two - cluster dynamics for any @xmath78 between @xmath168 $ ] . in the numerical simulation of egcml we find that the two clusters of egcml undergo a switch process by inputs which is similar to that in gcml . a typical sample of the egcml switch is shown in fig . [ fig7 ] . but let us first list the general differences of egcml switch from gcml switch below and add description particular to fig . [ fig7 ] afterwards . \(1 ) _ slower reaction _ : by an injection of a pulse we transfer a map in the minority cluster to the majority cluster . in gcml the reaction of the attractor to this input is quite rapid and the attractor shifts to the new movement only after a few steps of the iteration . on the other hand in egcml the attractor reacts to the input gradually in several iteration steps this has a simple reason . the synchronization of maps in an egcml cluster is looser . when a map is transferred there occurs a negotiation among maps in each cluster to reform the clusters and then the two clusters mutually move to the new attractor . this is similar to the two step phase - synchronization found in the globally coupled flows@xcite . \(2 ) _ self - organized transition _ : in egcml the effect of one pulse depends on the unbalance between clusters at the time of injection . if the unbalance is not high just a slow reaction of the attractor described above occurs . if the unbalance is high the map transportation by an input is followed by a self - movement of another map between clusters in the same direction . this occurs after a few tens of steps for the egcml of the size @xmath169 . if the unbalance is close to the threshold determined by the above statistical analysis ( fig . [ fig3]b ) the transportation of a single map triggers a cascade . the last injected pulse induces follower maps to move from a cluster to the other cluster in the same direction and in some 100 iteration steps the move grows up to a series of avalanches at various scales . the corresponding change of the spatial distribution of positive and negative clusters is similar to a percolation transition . under this process no more external input is given and the maps are themselves forming a metastable state . both the existence of a threshold and the formation of clusters at various scales suggest a remarkable similarity to the self - organized criticality , e.g. @xcite , but further investigation on a larger size lattice , in particular the measurement of the critical exponent , is required to verify the relation . \(3 ) _ the mixing _ : in egcml the two - cluster attractor after the chaotic transient process is for most cases approximately the same with that before . the change of the population unbalance is only a few percent in most of the runs . but there occurs swapping of maps between clusters and the composition of the clusters in terms of maps is often different before and after the egcml switch . the posi - nega switch in gcml is realized by the fact that no mixing of maps across the mean field occur during the chaotic transient process . in egcml the mixing does occur since each map is under the influence of position - dependent @xmath55 . thus the egcml switch is a posi - nega switch as a cluster process but not as the map process . in view of the brain dynamics this difference may be immaterial since what is important is the activity of whole neurons rather than the identity of individual neurons . \(4 ) _ self - organized spatial clusters in egcml _ : before the switch the maps in the positive cluster and those in the negative cluster are almost randomly distributed on the lattice . the transition to chaotic transient process goes like a percolation transition . when the self - organized mass movement starts , the positive maps form several large - size spatial clusters and so do the negative maps . since these spatial clusters are formed by the long - range interaction the formation of them is more remarkable in the lattice of larger size . the spatial clusters can be best traced in the chaotic process by distinguishing the maps by the mean field of whole maps . at short time scale often we observe a posi - nega switch of spatial patterns . but due to mixing the spatial clustering pattern changes at longer time scale . now we explain fig . [ fig7]a which is a typical egcml switch event sampled in @xmath170 lattice ( @xmath171 ) . _ preparation : _ the maps are iterated from random start and a few tens of pulses are injected during the first 1500 iteration steps until the two synchronizing clusters exhibit period 32 oscillation mutually opposite in phase . _ start of chaotic process : _ at @xmath172 we injected ten pulses simultaneously to randomly chosen maps on the lattice . this was necessary to show the whole process in one figure . had we injected the pulses one by one with say a hundred steps in between we had been able to see the accelerated cascade transition as described in ( 2 ) above . but still we can see in fig . [ fig7]a that the process after @xmath173 is a self - organized cascading process . _ the posi - nega switch between clusters : _ at @xmath174 the transient process ceased and a periodic attractor of two clusters appeared . as indicated by arrows we see clearly that it is the same attractor as before . the change of the unbalance of population between the two clusters is less than one percent in this switch . _ the spatial clusters : _ the snap - shot patterns of the maps at the even iteration steps are shown in the boxes below the evolution plot . in the upper boxes we distinguish the maps with respect to the mean field while in the lower boxes we used the unstable fixed point @xmath84 . in either way we can see that spatial clusters are formed by the self - interaction of maps during the chaotic transient process . we see clearly that the maps undergo a posi - nega switch among themselves between snap - shots 4 - 7 in the upper boxes . on the other hand in the lower boxes the pattern becomes sometimes totally black and sometimes totally white . hence , we see that the distinction by the mean field is a better way to sense the spatial cluster formation on the lattice . a distinction by the mean field is sensitive to the fluctuation around the collective coordinate . the clustering pattern extracted by this method is the long - range fluctuation dynamics of maps on the lattice . this long - range interaction dynamics can be seen more remarkably on a larger lattice which allows the formation of the spatial pattern of longer wavelength . in fig . [ fig7]b we show the samples of amazing spatial patterns formed during the chaotic transient process in the run of @xmath175 lattice ( @xmath176 ) . the snap - shots were sequentially taken at every four iteration steps . we observe that a small seed of fluctuation tends to grow into a circular dense pattern by the chaotic diffusion process on the lattice in accord with the isotropic interaction in egcml . it is interesting to note the similarity of the patterns observed on the lattice to the galaxies in the universe and in particular the appearance of patterns like globular nebula . the egcml may be used as a toy model for the formation of density fluctuations in a nonlinear diffusion process , though further study is required to test this speculation . the turbulent regime is generically the region of small @xmath11 and known by the so - called hidden coherence phenomenon . generally it is understood that in this region maps evolve almost randomly at small lattice size @xmath2 and that there occurs the hidden coherence at large @xmath2 . but actually the turbulent regime has a subtler feature . we are going to show that it is a regime where the grand periodic or quasi - periodic motion of the whole maps is in action almost everywhere . but first let us quote briefly previous observations in the literature in three items . \(i ) when gcml is iterated from a random configuration with a small coupling ( @xmath177 ) and a large nonlinear parameter ( @xmath178 ) it reaches a final state which is an ensemble of maps and tiny clusters , each moving chaotically due to high nonlinearity of the map . ( we show below that they are under certain coherence almost everywhere in the turbulent regime even though each element looks in an independent random motion . ) the number of elements increases proportionally to the number of whole maps in sharp contrast to the ordered regime where the dynamics of maps reduces to that of a few clusters@xcite . \(ii ) it was found in the statistical analysis of the mean field fluctuations that there emerges certain coherence between elements for large lattice size @xmath2@xcite . ( we show below some reservation is necessary to this statement . ) let us denote the mean field of the @xmath2 maps on the lattice @xmath1 at time @xmath85 as @xmath179 if @xmath180 are really @xmath2 independent random variables with a common distribution , the mean square deviation ( msd ) of the fluctuation ( @xmath181 ) should decrease proportionally to @xmath182 by the law of large numbers ( lln ) and the distribution of the @xmath183 must be a gaussian for sufficiently large @xmath2 by the central limit theorem ( clt ) . however the time series analysis of the mean field fluctuation shows that there is a threshold @xmath184 in @xmath2 ( depending on both @xmath12 and @xmath11 ) above which msd ceases to shrink even though the distributions remains in a gaussian shape . even though the elements ( maps and tiny clusters ) look evolving independently each other the violation of lln must reflect some hidden coherence between the elements . in fact an introduction of a very small independent noise term in each map restores lln@xcite . \(iii ) this violation of lln observed in the time averaged distribution of @xmath183 reflects that the probability distribution @xmath185 that a map takes a value @xmath186 explicitly depends on time . a noise intensity analysis of ensembles successfully proves lln@xcite . if lln should hold in the time average , @xmath185 would have to be the fixed point distribution of the frobenius - perron(fp ) evolution equation@xcite . it has been shown that the fixed point distribution is unstable due to the periodic windows inherent to the chaotic logistic map@xcite . the coherence manifests itself in the mutual information@xcite . on the other hand the temporal correlation function similar to the edwards - anderson order parameter for the spin glass@xcite decays to zero exponentially . thus it may not be due to freezing between two elements@xcite . all these are important observations for the turbulent regime of gcml . but this is not the whole story . especially one should not simply conclude by the above list that the turbulent regime of gcml ( and also egcml ) is a regime with complete randomness at small @xmath2 and with the hidden coherence for larger @xmath2 . the msd and distributions previously reported @xcite are only for the limited regions of the turbulent regime where the mean field distributions looks semi - gaussian and the violation of lln for large @xmath2 is remarkable . but there do exist regions in the turbulent regime where the coherence is suppressed strongly and the msd obeys lln in a good approximation . oppositely there are also large regions where the final attractors are two or three clusters which evolve stably ( until the end of @xmath187 iterations ) in period three ; a grand periodicity in the turbulent regime . furthermore even in a large part of the hidden coherence region the distribution is not really gaussian ; it is only semi - gaussian ( trapezoidal ) or has visible peaks on top of semi - gaussian distribution . we can detect the remains of the periodic coherent motion by an analysis of the decay of a temporal correlation function for these regions . the turbulent regime is actually the region which is full of periodicity remnants and the hidden coherence is realized in between the genuinely turbulent regions and manifestly periodic regions . the egcml shares the same features with gcml . in the following we show these facts by an extensive analysis over the whole turbulent regime . we measure the distribution of @xmath183 and its msd at every point on the grid on the @xmath188 plane in the turbulent regime at a fixed value of the nonlinear parameter @xmath12 . here we choose @xmath189 as a canonical value but our observations below generally hold for other values of @xmath12 larger than @xmath190 . at @xmath191 the turbulent regime is from @xmath192 to @xmath193 for gcml and from @xmath192 to @xmath194 for egcml ( see fig . [ fig1 ] a and b ) . thus we set a @xmath195 @xmath188 grid where the lattice size @xmath196 varies from @xmath197 to @xmath198 with an increment of @xmath199 two is necessary for two - dimensional egcml with the periodic boundary condition . for gcml we keep the increment the same for the sake of comparison . ] and the coupling @xmath11 varies from @xmath200 to @xmath194 with an increment @xmath201 . at every point on the @xmath188 grid with @xmath12 fixed at @xmath202 , the maps are iterated from a random start and the mean field @xmath183 is measured during the time interval between @xmath203 and @xmath204 . thus the result for one run at @xmath191 is a @xmath195 table of distributions and each distribution is a histogram of @xmath205 @xmath183 . we have repeated the run several times for the same @xmath12 and verified that the general result is independent from the change of the initial configuration of randomly produced maps . we have also checked in two ways that our @xmath188 grid is sufficiently fine to see the general feature of the turbulent regime . firstly we randomly chose more than a hundred squares of the grid and subdivided them . using this finer grid we have verified that either the variation of @xmath11 or @xmath2 within each square does not cause any significant change of the distribution ( a local check ) . secondly the compiled @xmath206 distributions are sufficient to make an animated show of the distribution . we observed by this animation that the distribution changes systematically the shape with variation of either @xmath11 or @xmath2 over the whole @xmath188 grid though the onset of the apparent periodic distribution is quite rapid ( a global check ) . we find that a special care must be taken over for the transient time when we are on the edge of the periodic window region . there the maps may fall sometimes into the final periodic attractor after , for instance , @xmath207 iterations but sometimes only after @xmath208 iterations depending on the random initial values . for this edge region we have done a separate analysis using a sequence of runs , each consists of @xmath204 to @xmath187 iterations . we comment on this region in sec . v d. this simple but tedious analysis distributions for both models . ] was the start of the work to unveil the real feature of the turbulent regime . in fig . [ fig8]a and b we show the msd of the mean field ( @xmath183 ) distributions at @xmath189 as a surface plot over the @xmath209 grid for gcml and egcml respectively . both msd and @xmath2 are plotted in the logarithmic scale so that the linear edge of the surface in the front panel at @xmath192 is of course due to lln . for a non - zero but very small @xmath11 @xmath210 , the lln still holds to a good approximation but for a larger @xmath11 we can clearly see that the surfaces have many peaks . the global features of the msd surfaces may be summarized as follows . * the valleys * : at the valleys of the surface the msd still approximately respects lln and we may call these valleys as genuinely turbulent regions . apart from the valleys lln does not hold . this does not imply the real violation of the lln in the ensemble average@xcite . what is meant by the violation of lln here is that there is a larger fluctuation in the time series of @xmath183 than expected by lln . we are interested in detecting the coherence among the evolving elements by the enhanced msd . for both gcml and egcml the peaks divide into two classes except that the peaks are more parallel each other for gcml . below we quote figures for gcml . * the first - class peaks * : we can see two very high and broad peaks at @xmath211 and @xmath212 and lln is violated extremely on them . here the excess msd is observed also for small @xmath2 . let us call them as the first - class peaks of the msd surface . * the second - class peaks * : separated by the large first - class peaks there are also several minor peaks . their locations for @xmath191 are @xmath213 let us call them as the second - class peaks . provided that one keeps eyes only on the second - class peaks the msd first decreases with increasing @xmath2 following lln and then above certain threshold @xmath214 the msd ceases to decrease and remains approximately in a plateau . this is a characteristic behavior of msd at the hidden coherence . however we show below that the @xmath183 distribution is not a gaussian but is a distorted gaussian in the bulk of the second - class peak regions . now we analyze directly the table of @xmath195 distributions of the mean field @xmath183 at @xmath191 for both gcml and egcml to understand how the distribution looks like for the enhanced msd regions . before this analysis we had thought from the literature@xcite that the distributions are all gaussian with possible msd enhancement at least for the central region of the @xmath183 histogram . distribution is limited in the range @xmath215 $ ] , it can not be a finite width gaussian distribution over @xmath216 . when we discuss whether the @xmath183 distribution is gaussian or not we concern whether the essence of the clt , that the convolution of independent random distributions peaks like gaussian in the central region , is in action or not . the ratio of the fourth to the second moment must be three for a perfect gaussian and for the @xmath183 distribution a small deviation from three is reported @xcite . but it is sensitive to the tail region and the dynamics in the central region is obscured in a ratio . for instance , the rank three distribution below is often two overlapping gaussian peaks due to the periodic clusters with high mixing but a ratio of moments can not tell it . ] but to our first surprise we find that there are a variety of distributions involved in the table of gcml and egcml . we assign each distribution a pattern classification number or a rank from zero to four by its shape . 1 . the distribution is gaussian . compared with the gaussian distribution at @xmath192 with common @xmath12 and @xmath2 , the msd agrees within 20 percent error . 2 . still gaussian but with more than 20 percent increase of the msd . at large @xmath2 we see the msd can become even more than twice . a singly peaked distribution but the shape is distorted from gaussian . typically a gaussian - like peak polarized to the right or left , or trapezoidal . either it has a few sharp peaks on top of a broad band , or it is an apparent overlapping gaussian distribution . it manifestly shows the periodic motion of elements . the distribution consists of a few sharp peaks only . at rank zero the mean field distribution obeys both lln and clt and the maps may be thought as independent random numbers with a common probability distribution . oppositely at rank four the maps are in periodic motion and so is the mean field . the ranks are organized in a way that the periodicity of the elements becomes more manifest with an increase of the rank . in fig . [ fig9]a and b we show the rank distribution on the @xmath188 grid as a density plot for gcml and egcml respectively . we find the followings . \(1 ) there is a remarkable match between the msd surface plots and the distribution density plots . the msd surface is high ( low ) wherever the rank of the distribution is high ( low ) . the rank distribution plot is almost a contour plot of the msd surface . this is highly non - trivial . that the rank plot is a contour plot of a surface means that there occurs no jump of ranks when we vary either @xmath11 or @xmath2 . for instance to go to rank four from rank zero one has to pass the intermediate rank regions . this indicates that the dynamics of maps changes continuously ( not necessarily smoothly ) when either @xmath11 or @xmath2 is varied over the turbulent regime . \(2 ) the fist class peaks of the msd surface occur just at the rank three and four distributions . the first - class peaks are due to the periodic coherent motions of elements . \(3 ) in the second - class peaks the mean field distribution is rank zero ( both clt and lln hold . ) for small @xmath2 . when @xmath2 is increased with @xmath11 fixed , it becomes rank one ( clt holds but lln violated ) above certain threshold . with a further increase of @xmath2 it almost always become rank two ( even clt is not fully operative ) . no higher rank distribution ( rank three or four ) appears in the second - class peak regions . only in small band(s ) of @xmath11 ( for instance , only in a narrow band around @xmath217 for @xmath191 ) the rank remains one for large @xmath2 . \(4 ) the threshold between rank zero and rank one distribution precisely agrees with the break point @xmath214 of the drop of msd following lln . for reference we superpose the approximate curve for the @xmath214 ( @xmath218 ) given by @xcite in fig . [ fig9 ] and indeed it runs roughly between the rank zero and rank one regions . we consider the fact in ( 3 ) that the rank one distribution changes smoothly to the rank two distribution with increasing @xmath2 is a key to the hidden coherence ; it indicates that the coherence between maps hidden in the rank one distribution region becomes manifest in the adjacent rank two distribution region . hereafter we focus our attention to gcml . in fig . [ fig10 ] we show a sample of ( 3 ) in the left three boxes . we fix @xmath12 and @xmath11 ( @xmath219 and give the @xmath183 distributions at various @xmath2 ( @xmath220 ) which are sampled in @xmath204 iterations from random starts discarding the first @xmath102 steps . we also display in each box the @xmath183 distribution with @xmath11 set to zero as a reference distribution . in the box for @xmath221 the two distributions are indistinguishable . the @xmath183 distribution is hence rank zero and both lln and clt hold . at @xmath222 the distribution with @xmath223 becomes a gaussian with enhanced msd . it is rank one and indicates the hidden coherence ; clt holds but lln does not and @xmath224 ) . but the continuous change of dynamics to higher ranks , such as from the second box to the third box was not noted . ] . now in the third box at @xmath225 the distribution turns out to be the rank two distorted gaussian distribution . even clt no longer holds . in the fourth box we also exhibit the @xmath183 distribution at @xmath226 , @xmath223 and @xmath65 . this is in our classification the rank three distribution with two overlapping gaussian peaks . in the model with @xmath191 , we can move to this dynamics region by varying @xmath11 , i.e. by traversing the turbulent regime . this point is further substantiated in the following subsections . at this point we need some explanation on the terminology of the _ hidden _ coherence . the interesting phenomenon that above some @xmath214 the lln in the time series is violated certainly occurs but now we have found that it is restricted to the second - class peak regions only . there are valleys where lln approximately holds even for large @xmath2 and also the first - class peak regions where lln is violated even for small @xmath2 . and now even in the second - class peak regions the place where the clt holds ( with lln violated ) is again restricted . for @xmath191 it is only a narrow band around @xmath217 and it moves to the larger @xmath11 for larger @xmath12 . thus if a distinction between the rank one and two distribution is made and the hidden coherence is defined strictly as the phenomenon that clt holds with no approximation ( i.e. excluding the rank two distribution ) but with broken lln , it can live only in a very restricted region among the second - class peak regions . we will further show below that a careful analysis of the decay exponent of the temporal correlator can also unveil the coherence among maps . but still we consider the first discovery@xcite of the onset of the violation of lln _ even in the region where the clt holds ( rank one ) _ is remarkable . our point in emphasizing the distinction between rank one and two distributions is that the recognition that the rank one dynamics region is adjacent in the @xmath188 space to the rank two dynamics region which in turn is adjacent to the rank three and so on enables us to track down the change of dynamics and thus leads us to a working hypothesis that the hidden coherence is the most modest manifestation of the coherent quasi - periodic motion of maps ubiquitous in the turbulent regime . now that we have identified the various regions in the turbulent regime with distinct manifestation of periodicity let us to proceed to clarify how the dynamics of maps in these regions are related each other . to collect necessary information it is best to traverse the turbulence regime at fixed @xmath227 and varying @xmath11 as a tuning parameter . in fig . [ fig11 ] we present a sample record of such an expedition at @xmath228 . the first column shows the mean field distributions as well as the single map distributions . the former is the average during the steps from @xmath203 to @xmath229 , and the latter is the average during the last @xmath230 steps of @xmath204 iterations . in the second column the rank of the @xmath183 distribution is denoted at the top in each box . the evolution of a hundred selected maps is displayed for the last seven steps . in order to chase the periodic motion of elements we devise a simple temporal correlator of the _ relative coordinate vector _ @xmath231 of maps around the mean field : @xmath232 the average over @xmath85 is taken for the last @xmath99 steps . this correlator is displayed in the third column . we show it just as defined by ( [ correlator ] ) but for the measurement of the decay exponent we quote values obtained by the signed logarithm plot ( @xmath233log@xmath234 ) of @xmath235 . for smaller lattice analysis we also averaged over data with different initial configurations to improve the statistics but this did not cause any significant change for the exponent estimation . the last column shows the return maps of @xmath183 ( the set of points ( @xmath236 ) from the last @xmath99 steps . let us start at pure randomness @xmath192 . the map average distribution has many sharp peaks with fractal hierarchy structure reflecting the unstable fixed points of a single map in the chaotic region . the @xmath183 distribution obeys of course both lln and clt and naturally sharp gaussian ( rank zero ) for @xmath65 . the evolution plot shows a simple logistic pattern and the return map is a simple tiny cloud of points . the correlator is one at @xmath237 by definition and decays almost instantly . we can foresee that periodicity three window in the first - class peaks is waiting us ( @xmath238)$ ] but let us choose @xmath239 to see if any precursor of it emerges . we find that the @xmath183 distribution has become rank one . the map average distribution has lost some sub - peaks since any one of the maps is pulled by the mean field in fluctuation and it has become more difficult for it to stay at the unstable sub - fixed points for long time . the coherence is still invisible neither in the map evolution nor in the return map . but we find that remarkably the correlator now oscillates in period three and decays exponentially ( @xmath240 steps for @xmath241 decay ) . this period three damping oscillation of the correlator starts at @xmath242 except for the valleys and the decay exponent becomes smaller for larger @xmath11 . at @xmath243 the @xmath183 distribution is rank two . we are now very close to the first - class peaks . the correlator survives longer period ( @xmath244 steps for @xmath241 decay ) in period three motion . but the return map does not sense this . from the evolution diagram we can immediately tell that this failure of the return map is due to mixing of the maps between the quasi - clusters at a high rate . this inadequacy of a return map should be noted . at @xmath245 we are on the edge of the first - class peak regions . now very careful analysis is necessary to account for the first transient behavior of the maps . the truncation of the first @xmath102 steps is not sufficient and we have to watch the evolution carefully until at least during @xmath204 steps . we show two typical samples at @xmath245 . in the first sample at @xmath245 the maps remain in a few quasi - clusters with mixing until the end of the run . the unstable quasi - clusters oscillate in period three and the correlator decays to @xmath241 only after @xmath246 due to the smaller mixing than before . now we can see in the return map three clouds of points turn out . the map average distribution has only three prominent peaks and all other sub peaks are lost . the corresponding @xmath183 distribution is rank three with both a visible peak and a shoulder on top of a broad band . the high msd of the @xmath183 distribution comes from the large separations between the dominant unstable fixed points of the maps in interaction . this distribution is an example of overlapping gaussian distributions . for the perfect periodic motion of the tight clusters , sharp delta peaks would be observed in both map and @xmath183 distributions . due to the decay of the quasi - clusters caused by the mixing the sharp delta peaks become broad and turn into overlapping gaussian distributions . we frequently observed more prominent overlapping two or three gaussian peaks in the whole analysis of the turbulent regime using both @xmath12 and @xmath11 as tuning parameters . ( see , for instance , the fourth box in fig . [ fig10 ] . ) in the second sample at @xmath245 the maps literally dropped into period three attractor of three clusters at @xmath247 . as the map evolution plot shows the map positions in each cluster exhibit some variance in evolution so that we would better describe the clusters as quasi - clusters . the broad band in this rank three @xmath183 distribution is an artifact of the transient motion before the maps fall into the final attractor . there is no mixing at all between the clusters . the @xmath183 distribution is a sharp single peak and the @xmath183 return map is confined in a very small range . this is due to the fact that the three clusters happen to be almost equally populated in this run so that the mean field fluctuation is minimized . at @xmath248 we are at the summit of the first - class peak . here the maps almost always drop into period three attractor of two clusters . by only two clusters in period three motion the mean field must also fluctuates in period three . thus the @xmath183 distribution has sharp three peaks and msd turns out high . the value of msd is solely determined by the dynamics of clusters and @xmath2 independent . also the return map is widely spread . while we traverse the summit of the first - class peaks till @xmath249 the attractor remains in period three . sometimes it bifurcates to period six . in further expedition we depart from the first - class peaks and go down into the second class peak regions . everything then occurs in reverse way in this descent till @xmath250 . from @xmath251 we traverse the second - class peaks as well as the valleys . at the second - class peaks the correlator survives above @xmath241 until @xmath252 but with no apparent low periodicity . then above @xmath253 the correlator starts again catching the precursor of the period two opposite phase motion in the two - cluster regime of the gcml . thus the indeterminacy of the period of quasi - clusters beyond second peak regions comes from the fact that the regions are just in between the period three window and two - cluster opposite - phase motion regions . after @xmath254 the correlator shows perfect period two motion and the decay is smoothly prolonged with increasing @xmath11 . at @xmath255 it only decreases by a few percent even at @xmath256 . correspondingly , above @xmath254 the middle peak in the map average distribution starts approaching to the peak at higher @xmath186 and above @xmath257 the map average distribution splits into two ( no events in the middle gap region ) . still in the evolution plot we can see the maps are in loose clusters with mixing between each other . the high msd of the rank two and three distributions above @xmath254 is clearly induced by the widely spread dominant unstable fixed points of low periodicity . we have done a similar analysis at various @xmath12 up to @xmath226 and verified that all above features at @xmath191 are unchanged . the various manifestation of the periodicity is summarized in table [ table1 ] for @xmath191 . only a minor difference for larger @xmath12 is that the regions of rank one distribution above the first rank msd peaks become larger shifted to larger @xmath11 and also the rank three distribution starts to appear there . since the rate of the mixing of maps between clusters is the key to the turbulent regime we have also measured the temporal correlator of the clustering pattern matrix similar to the anderson - edwards order parameter@xcite . it exhibits the same variation of the decay exponents with our correlator . we examine below how the dynamics in various regions are related each other . ( 1 ) let us first compare the dynamics of the periodic regions with that at @xmath258 . at @xmath258 maps evolve almost independently with long visit at all of the unstable fixed points of the logistic map . thus the map average distribution has many peaks with fractal structure peaking . since the maps behave as almost independent random variables with the same probability distribution , naturally both lln and clt hold . at the periodic window in the first - class msd peak regions , on the other hand , the @xmath23 focusing effect tunes the maps to form tightly bound two or three clusters mutually oscillating in period three attractor and this leads to the rank four distribution with sharp delta peaks . the dynamics of clusters in the periodic attractor is solely determined by @xmath12 , @xmath11 and the effective couplings between the clusters determined by the population _ ratios _ among the clusters ) does exhibit the same period three attractor at the same value of @xmath11 . ] . the msd of the @xmath183 distribution is again determined by the @xmath12 , @xmath11 and the population _ ratios _ between the clusters , and there is no room for the explicit @xmath2 dependence . similar coherent dynamics is realized also in the ordered two - cluster regime beyond the turbulent regime ( @xmath259 for @xmath191 ) . the turbulent regime has a period three window in the center of it and the two - cluster regime beyond it . we discuss below how these affect other regions . \(2 ) when @xmath11 deviates from the range necessary for the period three cluster dynamics ( or for the period two - cluster dynamics ) , the perfect synchronization of maps among each cluster is no longer realized . but what we observed in the last subsection is that even for some large deviation of @xmath11 the maps still move under certain coherence if @xmath2 is beyond the threshold @xmath214 . such coherent motion of maps can be best described by _ unstable quasi - clusters _ the decay life of which is given by the inverse of the exponent of the correlator . the maps now divide into a few masses _ at any instance _ of the evolution . in a short time scale these masses oscillate mutually in the same periodicity as before as we observed in both the map evolution plot and the correlator . but the variance of map positions among each mass is not so small and the synchronization of maps in each mass is also not perfect . hence we call these masses as quasi - clusters . due to the fail of perfect synchronization , the quasi - clusters mix each other by the exchange of maps and soon they loose their identities . so the quasi - clusters are unstable and have short life time . but still at any instance of evolution there do exist quasi - clusters . the quasi - clusters defined at a certain time decay but in the evolution of maps new quasi - clusters are kept created . we may regard these quasi - clusters as _ remnants _ of the perfect periodic motion of maps . in fact when we approach the periodic regions the decay exponent of the correlator decreases smoothly , that is , the life time of the quasi - clusters increases smoothly , signaling the phase transition from turbulence to periodicity . in pure turbulence the system is invariant under the exchange of maps , while in the system of maps divided into clusters this permutation symmetry is broken . simultaneously the system in pure turbulence is invariant under the temporal translation , while the system in periodic motion is only invariant under the temporal translation just for the period . the self - organized state of maps in periodic quasi - clusters emerges as the state of broken symmetry from pure turbulence by a weak self - coupling and it emerges only for large @xmath2 . this is interestingly reminiscent of the onset of ordered parameter at the spontaneous break down of the global symmetry in the field theory where an infinite number of dynamical degree of freedom is necessary in order to support the ordered vacuum . see , for instance , weinberg@xcite where the broken symmetry state of a chair is elucidated . it is important that the maps in the quasi - clusters approximately follow the previous cluster attractor in the life time of the quasi - clusters . this means that the @xmath183 distribution is controlled by the scale of the previous attractor approximately and again determined by the @xmath12 , @xmath11 and the population _ ratios _ and not by @xmath2 . thus there emerges a @xmath183 distribution whose msd does not decrease with @xmath2 and lln is violated . depending on the rate of mixing and the allowed population ratios at the @xmath11 , distributions of various ranks emerge . \(3 ) if the deviation of @xmath11 from the necessary range for periodic cluster attractor is not large , the failure in the map synchronization is not also large . the quasi - clusters decay by low rate mixing of members so the correlator survives for long time exhibiting clearly the periodicity of the previous periodic cluster attractor . but the would - be delta - peaks of both the average map distribution and the @xmath183 distribution at no mixing now change into overlapping gaussian distributions with visible separation between the peaks . these changes of the correlator and the @xmath183 distribution at small deviation of @xmath11 are precisely what we observe around the first - class msd peaks and near the upper boundary of the turbulent regime adjacent to the ordered two - cluster phase . with further deviation of @xmath11 the mixing rate becomes higher . the correlator decays more quickly and the @xmath183 distribution becomes from rank three to rank two - the distorted gaussian distribution . we observe this when we go down from the first - class peaks to the region of @xmath258 or when we approach the first - class peak regions from above . in the former case the correlator keeps exhibiting the period three damped oscillation even if we go down into the rank one @xmath183 distribution region . in the latter case the periodicity of the correlator becomes indefinite below @xmath254 for @xmath191 since naturally we are coming down from two - cluster regime with period two to the period three window , and we finally loose the track of a periodicity remnant ( rank two distribution ) when we go further into the narrow band of rank one @xmath183 distribution region . this is the genuine hidden coherence region . \(4 ) the place the hidden coherence can live has now become very limited since we have improved the sensitivity to the coherence effect . in the old analysis@xcite , the distinction between rank one and two distributions was ignored and neither the change of the decay exponent of the correlator with @xmath11 nor the periodicity of it was analyzed . the periodic window and the valleys were not discussed also . then the coherence seemed to live hidden everywhere in the turbulent regime if @xmath260 . now , both the periodic window with manifest coherence and the valleys with valid lln should be excluded first of all . furthermore , in the regions where the correlator has clearly caught the periodicity remnant , it is no longer legitimate to describe the coherence as hidden . thus , regarding the correlator the coherence is hidden only in a limited region in between the period - three and period - two remnant regions among the second - class msd peak regions . this is the region with @xmath251 for @xmath191 . see table [ table1 ] and eq . ( [ second ] ) . here the correlator does show longer decay time ( @xmath241 decay within @xmath261 steps ) than that at @xmath258 but it decays with large fluctuation showing no low periodicity . this is natural for the region in between two different periodicity regions . but not only the correlator but also the shape of the @xmath183 distribution is a vital quantity to keep track of the change the dynamics . almost everywhere in the possible residence of the hidden coherence regarding the correlator , the @xmath183 distribution is rank two ( rather than gaussian ) and naturally understood as the smooth continuation of the rank three overlapping gaussian distribution . the clt is apparently violated here and the distribution is still controlled by the scale of the attractor . therefore , the place where the coherence is literally hidden from both the correlator and distribution analyses is now very limited . it is the narrow band at @xmath262 for @xmath191 and around @xmath263 for @xmath226 where the @xmath183 distribution is really gaussian with enhanced msd ( rank one ) and the correlator does not show the low periodicity . here the coherence seen in the enhanced msd can be only substantiated either by the finite mutual information or by the instability of the fp fixed point distribution . but in ( 3 ) above we successfully tracked down the smooth change of distribution ( and the corresponding change of the decay exponent of the correlator ) with the deviation of @xmath11 from rank four down to rank two distribution regions which surround the literally hidden coherence region . this gives a new way to look at the hidden coherence . higher rate mixing with further smooth deviation of @xmath11 should necessarily weaken the coherence among the maps and change the distorted gaussian ( rank two ) to the gaussian distribution . if the scale of the attractor still remains to govern the map dynamics the @xmath183 distribution with @xmath2-independent msd would emerges . we propose this last statement as a working hypothesis for the origin of the hidden coherence . up to this point we have heavily depended on the numerical simulation . our concern is the statistical properties of the large - size gcml ( egcml ) and the monte - carlo simulation is naturally the basic approach to the phenomenology of such system . we have shown that a faithful extensive analysis of the data unveils amazing new features of the system . but , of course , if by some analytical method , one could relate the systematic manifestation of periodicity in the turbulent regime to the periodic behavior of the element of the system , namely the period three window of a single logistic map , it would be certainly a step forward to the real understanding of the turbulent regime . in this last subsection we discuss such an analytic approach . let us consider a typical case where the n maps are divided into equally populated three clusters @xmath264 ( @xmath265 ) and the clusters move cyclically round the three fixed positions @xmath266 . in such a maximally symmetric and period three motion of gcml maps , @xmath267 , the meanfield of all maps at time @xmath85 becomes a time - independent constant which is nothing but an equal weight average @xmath268 of @xmath269 . to see this let us first rewrite the meanfield using the invariance rule ( [ sumrule ] ) as @xmath270 then for the configuration in case the last average can be calculated as @xmath271 where @xmath272 denotes the coordinate of the cluster @xmath273 at time n. therefore , if such a configuration is produced by the interaction between the maps via the meanfield , any one of gcml maps must be evolving by a common evolution equation @xmath274 we can cast the evolution equation ( [ consthevolution ] ) with a constant meanfield @xmath268 and @xmath275 to a simple logistic map @xmath276 with a reduced coupling constant @xmath277 by a linear scale transformation @xcite @xmath278 the reduction rate @xmath279 is given by @xmath280 the period three window of the logistic map ( [ yevolution ] ) starts at @xmath281 by the tangent bifurcation and after the sequential bifurcation it closes at @xmath282 by the crisis . therefore the reduction rate @xmath279 must be for @xmath191 in the range @xmath283 and at a given rate @xmath279 within this range , ( [ rconstarint ] ) gives a curve of constraint on the @xmath284 plane . there is another constraint from self - consistency . each of the maps @xmath285 is related to the gcml maps @xmath286 by the linear transformation ( [ lineartransformation ] ) and so is the average value @xmath287 of maps @xmath285 to @xmath268 : @xmath288 since @xmath287 is simply an equal weight average of the period three stable orbits of ( @xmath289 ) , it can be estimated solely by the property of the logistic map without any recourse to the gcml evolution equation . for instance at the tangent bifurcation point ( @xmath290 ) , we have @xmath291 and from matching of the coefficients we obtain @xmath292 . numerically we find that @xmath293 slightly below the threshold @xmath294 , drops sharply ( @xmath295 ) to @xmath296 at the threshold @xmath297 , and @xmath287 gradually changes around @xmath298 until the end of the window ( @xmath299 ) . by eliminating @xmath268 from ( [ rconstarint ] ) and ( [ yconstaraint ] ) we obtain @xmath300 the estimated @xmath11 for @xmath191 from ( [ epsilonestimates ] ) is @xmath301 the estimates a , b , c and d are evaluated respectively below the threshold , at the threshold , at the first bifurcation point at the middle , and at the upper edge of the period three window in the order of increasing @xmath277 . before comparing with the simulation result we should note that a maximally symmetric configuration of equally populated three clusters in period three motion is assumed in deriving ( [ epsilonestimates ] ) . thus , the value of @xmath11 necessary for such a configuration should be deduced from the genuinely period three region , namely from the interval from b to c. we can predict that @xmath11 must be in the range ( 0.0365 , 0.0422 ) for the formation of such a maximally symmetric gcml configuration . for such a configuration the meanfield should not fluctuate in time and it will show up as a deep valley in the gcml msd surface . we have added two exterior estimates in ( [ estimates ] ) expecting that these extensions will cover the asymmetrically populated clusters in period three motion . now let us compare ( [ estimates ] ) with the range of the period three first - class peaks found in section v b , namely , @xmath302 and @xmath212 . firstly there is a remarkable agreement between the range of peaks and the range of estimates a to d in ( [ estimates ] ) . the whole period three window of a single logistic map shows up as the whole first - class peaks . a closer comparison with the observations in section v d gives further support for the link of the structure observed in the numerical simulation and the period three window of the logistic map . * we noted that in the deep valley of the msd surface between the two first - class peaks the formation of three clusters in period three motion . the valley region @xmath303 remarkably matches the above estimated range ( 0.0365,0.0422 ) for the maximally symmetric configuration . * we noted that in the upper first - class peak ( @xmath212 ) the maps almost always form only two clusters in period three motion . it is natural that the larger @xmath11 reduces the number of clusters from three to two . as we noted the extremely high msd in the first - class peak is induced by the asymmetric population configuration ( @xmath304 ) . furthermore we have verified by simulation that the first - class peak regions shift to higher @xmath11 when @xmath12 is increased precisely in accord with the prediction by ( [ epsilonestimates ] ) . it is remarkable that the maps with high nonlinearity are driven into coherent synchronizing clusters with very small interaction parameter @xmath11 once it takes the tune up value . a lot of further effort has to be devoted to fully appreciate the implication . the analytic approach here is only a step forward to this direction . a survey of the overall relation of peak - valley structure of the msd surface to the hierarchical windows of a single logistic map as well as the dynamical variation of the population configuration is now underway . in this article we have revisited the gcml and first resolved the puzzle of the posi - nega switch realized the two - cluster phase . the puzzle was that the maps posses the memory of the cluster to which they subject even though they pass through a transient chaotic process where many channels are open . we have proved that maps never mix across the mean field of them in the transient process . we have then analyzed the turbulent regime of gcml . to date the so - called hidden coherence has been the main target of interest in this region . we have presented our new finding that there exists a remarkable period three attractor regions in this regime . the turbulent regime locates in - between the genuinely turbulent region around @xmath192 and two - cluster regime of period two attractor and has this period three attractor regions in the center of it . we have shown that the remnant of the periodic coherence can be found almost everywhere in the turbulent regime by the measurement of the temporal correlator of the fluctuation of maps around the mean field and by the extensive analysis of the @xmath183 distributions over the whole turbulent regime . the dynamics of the turbulent regime can be well described by the quasi - clusters with mixing of elements between each other . the hidden coherence may be regarded the most modest manifestation of this remnant periodicity . by an analytic approach we have shown that the prominent periodicity manifestation in the turbulent regime is caused by the period three window of a single logistic map . a new extended globally coupled map lattice(egcml ) is constructed in which the interaction between maps decreases proportionally to the distance . egcml at @xmath42 has the same phase diagram with that of gcml . the bifurcation tree structure of the attractor of egcml in the two - cluster regime is also the same with that of gcml . the maps in each egcml cluster are phase synchronizing rather than synchronizing . the posi - nega switch between the two clusters is realized also in egcml . in the chaotic transient process in egcml - switch , formation of amazing spatial clusters of maps is observed . egcml may be viable for the simulation of chaotic diffusion process . we have also shown that the turbulence regime of egcml is also not immune from periodicity just like gcml turbulent regime . as a whole this work is an exploration of order in the chaos . the posi - nega switch in gcml is realized because there occurs no mixing in the chaotic transient process . in the chaotic transient process in a egcml - switch , interesting spatial clusters are formed . and the turbulent regime of both of gcml and egcml is dominated by the quasi - clusters of maps in periodic motion . it is a pleasure to note the author s debt of gratitude to k. kaneko . this work was started several years ago stimulated by the pioneering articles on gcml by him@xcite and the compact model gcml has been an unfailing source of interest since then . the author is thankful to fumio masuda who worked on this subject together with the author until the last one year of completion and the nice collaboration time with him is memorized . thanks also go to hidehiko shimada for many crucial suggestions , hayato fujigaki for his collaboration on the study of coupled flows done in parallel with this work , and kengo kikuchi for his unfailing effort on the analytic approach to gcml now underway . last but not at least the author wishes to thank wolfgang ochs at the max - planck institute for sharing his insight in this research and reading the manuscript . this work was supported by the faculty collaborative research grant from meiji university , grant - in - aids for scientific research from ministry of education , science and culture of japan , and grant for high techniques research from both organizations . k. kaneko , phys . lett . * 65 * , 1391 , ( 1990 ) ; + k. kaneko , physica ( amsterdam ) * 55d * , 368 , ( 1992 ) ; ibid . , * d86 * , 158 , ( 1995 ) . k. kaneko , physica ( amsterdam ) * 23d * , 436 ( 1986 ) ; + j. p. crutchfield and k. kaneko , _ in directions in chaos _ , edited by b. -l . hao ( world scientific , singapore , 1987 ) . see , for instance , + j.j . hopfield , proc . usa ( biophysics)*79 * , 2554 ( 1982 ) ; + w.a . little , math . * 19*,101 ( 1974 ) ; + d. j. amit , h. gutfreund and h. sompolinski , phys . rev . * a32 * , 1007 ( 1985 ) . .the various periodicity manifestation in the turbulent regime of gcml ( @xmath191 and @xmath65 ) . note that in each range of @xmath11 there are also valleys with an approximate lln along with listed peaks with the broken lln . [ table1 ] [ cols="^,^,^,^ " , ] Abstract:

Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.

Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered . Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video . Paper: as their name suggests , compact groups are small systems of several galaxies in a compact configuration on the sky . the first example was found over one hundred years ago by stephan ( 1877 ) who observed it visually using the 40-cm refractor of the observatoire de marseille . stephan s quintet is a small group of five galaxies , three of which show strong tidal distortions due to gravitational interaction . a second example was found 71 years later by seyfert ( 1948 ) from a study of harvard schmidt plates . seyfert s sextet ( figure 1 ) is one of the densest groups known , having a median projected galaxy separation of only @xmath1 kpc ( the hubble constant @xmath2 km s@xmath3 mpc@xmath3 ) . the palomar observatory sky survey ( poss ) provided a new and extensive resource for the systematic investigation of small groups of galaxies . two catalogs , the _ atlas of interacting galaxies _ ( vorontsov - velyaminov 1959 , 1975 ) and the _ atlas of peculiar galaxies _ ( arp 1966 ) , contain galaxies or galaxy groups selected on the basis of visible signs of interaction or peculiar appearance . in addition to stephan s quintet and seyfert s sextet , these include many new compact groups , including a striking chain of five galaxies , vv 172 . prior to these , shakhbazian ( 1957 ) had discovered a small dense cluster of 12 faint red galaxies that appeared so compact that they were initially mistaken for stars . over the next two decades , shakhbazian and collaborators examined over 200 poss prints covering 18% of the sky and cataloged 376 additional `` compact groups of compact galaxies '' ( shakhbazian 1973 , shakhbazian & petrosian 1974 , baier et al 1974 , petrosian 1974 , 1978 , baier & tiersch 1975 - 79 ) . apart from occasional photographic or spectroscopic observations ( eg . mirzoian et al 1975 , tiersch 1976 , massey 1977 , shakhbazian & amirkhanian 1979 , vorontsov - velyaminov et al 1980 , vorontsov - velyaminov & metlov 1980 ) these systems initially received little attention . however , interest in them is growing . although the majority seem to be small clusters , they share some of the properties , and pose some of the same questions , as do compact groups . when redshifts were measured for galaxies in the first compact groups ( burbidge & burbidge 1959 , 1961a ) , surprises were found . both stephan s quintet and seyfert s sextet contain a galaxy with a discordant redshift . it seemed unlikely that a foreground or background galaxy would appear so often projected within such compact systems ( burbidge & burbidge 1961a ) . this impression was further reinforced with the discovery of yet another discordant redshift in vv 172 ( sargent 1968 ) . are these examples of physical association between objects of widely different redshifts , as has been advocated for many years by arp ( 1987 ) ? even if the discordant galaxies are ignored , the velocity dispersions of these systems are generally higher than would be expected given their visible mass ( burbidge & burbidge 1959 , 1961b , 1961c , burbidge & sargent 1971 ) . it was argued that such groups must be unbound and disrupting ( eg . ambartsumian 1961 ) , although limber and mathews ( 1960 ) showed that the virial theorem could be satisfied for stephan s quintet , given the uncertainties in the projection factors , if the individual galaxy masses were considerably larger than those of isolated galaxies . the observations can of course also be explained if the bulk of the mass is in a non - visible form . in hindsight , this was one of the earliest indications of the possible existence of dark matter in galactic systems . a new problem emerged with the realization that bound groups would be unstable to orbital decay resulting from gravitational relaxation processes ( peebles 1971 ) . a simple calculation indicated that the dynamical - friction timescale was much shorter than the hubble time ( hickson et al 1977 ) , as was soon confirmed by numerical simulations ( carnevali et al 1981 ) . at the same time , it became increasingly clear that mergers played an important role in the evolution of many , if not all , galaxies ( press & schechter 1974 , ostriker & tremaine 1975 ) . compact groups emerged as prime locations for investigations of the dynamical evolution of galaxies . motivated by the desire for a homogeneous sample that could be subject to statistical analysis , rose ( 1977 ) , and later , hickson ( 1982 ) produced the first catalogs of compact groups having specific , quantitative , selection criteria . subsequent detailed investigation , at many wavelengths , has produced a large body of observational data for the hickson catalog . as a result , it has now become possible to address some of the outstanding questions concerning the nature of compact groups and their role in galaxy evolution . not surprisingly , new questions have been raised and new controversies have appeared . however , much progress has been made in resolving both old and new issues . this review is organized as follows : in section 2 , the definition of a compact group is discussed , along with methods of identification and surveys that have been made . in sections 3 - 5 , observed properties of these systems are summarized and discussed . sections 6 and 7 focus mainly on interpretation of the observations , and on implications of these results . all work on compact groups of galaxies can not possibly be discussed in this short paper , although an attempt is made to touch upon most current topics . other recent reviews of compact groups and closely related subjects include those by white ( 1990 ) , hickson ( 1990 , 1997 ) , whitmore ( 1992 ) , kiseleva & orlov ( 1993 ) , sulentic ( 1993 ) , and mamon ( 1995 ) . by `` compact group '' , we mean a small , relatively isolated , system of typically four or five galaxies in close proximity to one another . such groups do not necessarily form a distinct class , but may instead be extreme examples of systems having a range of galaxy density and population . because of this , the properties of the groups in any particular sample may be strongly influenced by the criteria used to define the sample . the early surveys used qualitative criteria that , while successful in finding many interesting individual objects , do not easily allow one to draw broad conclusions about the groups as a whole . thus , the focus in recent years has been on samples selected using specific , quantitative , criteria . these criteria define the minimum number and magnitude range of the galaxies , and also consider the galaxy spatial distribution . the use of quantitative selection criteria was pioneered by rose ( 1977 ) who searched for groups that have three or more galaxies that are brighter than a limiting magnitude of 17.5 , and that have a projected surface density enhancement of a factor of 1000 compared to the surrounding background galaxy density . searching an area of 7.5% of the sky , he found 170 triplets , 33 quartets , and 2 quintets . unfortunately , the sample received little follow - up study . sulentic ( 1983 ) re - examined the 35 rose groups which contain four or more galaxies and found that only a third actually satisfied the selection criteria . this is testimony to the difficulty of visual searches . a more fundamental problem is that the fixed magnitude limit in the selection criteria makes the sample susceptible to strong distance - dependent biases . in an attempt to reduce such effects , hickson ( 1982 , 1993 , 1994 ) adopted a relative magnitude criterion , selecting systems of four or more galaxies whose magnitudes differ by less than 3.0 . a distance independent ( to first order ) compactness criterion was employed : @xmath4 , where @xmath5 is the mean surface brightness of the group calculated by distributing the flux of the member galaxies over the smallest circular area containing their geometric centers . to avoid including the cores of rich clusters , an isolation criterion was necessary so as to reject the group if a non - member galaxy , not more than 3 mag fainter than the brightest member , occurred within three radii of the center of the circle . ( a non - member galaxy is a galaxy which if included in the group would cause the group to fail one or more of the selection criteria . ) from a search of 67% of the sky ( all the poss prints ) , and using magnitudes estimated from the poss red prints , exactly 100 groups were found satisfying these criteria ( hereafter hcg s ) . as the hcg sample is now the most widely studied , it is important to examine the biases introduced by the criteria , and by the visual search procedure . any sample selected on the basis of surface density will suffer from geometric and kinematic biases . the former occurs because non - spherical systems will be preferentially selected if they are oriented to present a smaller cross - sectional area ( eg . prolate systems pointed towards us ) ; the latter because we will preferentially select systems that , owing to galaxy orbital motion , are momentarily in a more compact state ( transient compact configurations ) . thus , a compact group might result from a chance alignment or transient configuration within a loose group ( mamon 1986 ) . this question will be considered in more detail in section 6.2 . other biases arise from the subjective nature of the search procedure . the original catalog contains a few mis - identifications , such as compact galaxies mistaken for stars , and marginal violations of the isolation criteria . in addition , when photometry was obtained for the galaxies in the catalog ( hickson et al 1989 ) , it was found that some groups would not satisfy the selection criteria if photometric magnitudes are used . attempts to rectify these problems have been made by hickson et al ( 1989 ) and sulentic ( 1997 ) . however , it should be emphasized that changes , such as using photometric magnitudes in the selection criteria , are not corrections to the catalog , but are actually the imposition of _ additional _ a postiori selection criteria . the resulting subsample is by no means complete because the new criteria are applied only to the visually - selected hcg catalog and not to the entire sky . because of the difficulty of identifying faint groups , the hcg catalog starts to become significantly incomplete at an integrated magnitude of about 13 ( hickson et al 1989 , sulentic & rabaa 1994 ) . a more subtle effect results from the difficulty of recognizing low - surface - brightness groups . because of this , the catalog also becomes incomplete at surface brightnesses fainter than 24 ( hickson 1982 ) . yet another effect is that groups may be more noticeable if the magnitude spread of their members is small . thus , the catalog may also be incomplete for magnitude intervals greater than about 1.5 ( prandoni et al 1994 ) . these effects are of critical importance in statistical analyses of the sample . one immediate conclusion is that the actual number of groups which satisfy the selection criteria may be considerably larger than the number found by a subjective search . it has recently become feasible to find compact groups by automated techniques . mamon ( 1989 ) used a computer to search tully s ( 1987 ) catalog of nearby galaxies and identified one new compact group , satisfying hickson s criteria , in the virgo cluster . prandoni et al ( 1994 ) applied similar criteria to digital scans of @xmath6 deg@xmath7 around the southern galactic pole and detected 59 new southern compact groups ( scgs ) . observations are presently underway to obtain accurate photometry and redshifts for this sample ( iovino private communication ) . the digitized palomar sky survey ii also offers new opportunities for the identification of compact groups ( de carvalho & djorgovski 1995 ) . an alternative approach is to identify groups of galaxies from redshift information , as was first done by humason et al ( 1956 ) . with the advent of large - scale redshift surveys , it has become possible to identify a reasonably - large sample of compact groups in this way . barton et al ( 1996 ) have compiled a catalog of 89 redshift - selected compact groups ( rscgs ) found by means of a friends - of - friends algorithm applied to a complete magnitude - limited redshift survey . galaxies having projected separations of @xmath8 kpc or less and line - of - sight velocity differences of 1000 km s@xmath3 or less are connected and the sets of connected galaxies constitute the groups . the numerical values were chosen to best match the characteristics of the hcg sample , and indeed , many of those rscgs that have at least four members are also hcgs . there are some significant differences , however : because foreground and background galaxies are automatically eliminated by the velocity selection criteria , this technique is more effective at finding groups in regions of higher galaxy density , which would fail the hcg isolation criterion . this criterion requires that the distance to the nearest neighbor be at least as large as the diameter of the group . the rscg criteria , on the other hand , require only that the nearest - neighbor distance be larger than the threshold distance ( @xmath8 kpc for the rscgs ) , which may be considerably smaller . it will therefore allow the inclusion of groups that are physically less isolated ( and therefore less physically distinct ) than would the hcg criterion . one would also expect that the numbers of groups found in a given volume by the less - restrictive rscg criteria to be larger than by the hcg criteria , as seems to be the case . while the redshift - selection method compliments the hcg angular - selection technique , one should keep in mind that it also selects groups according to apparent ( projected ) density the velocity information serves only to reject interlopers . thus it will be subject to some of the biases discussed above . also , because the galaxy sample used is magnitude - limited , rather than volume - limited , there will be redshift - dependent biases in the rscgs . however , the well - defined selection criteria and the completeness of the sample , should allow a quantitative determination of the effects of this bias . the space distribution and environment of compact groups provides important clues to their nature . the median redshift of the hcgs is @xmath9 , placing most of them at distances well beyond the virgo cluster ( hickson et al 1992 ) . a cursory inspection reveals that they are fairly uniformly distributed and show no preference for rich clusters . this is at least partly due to the isolation criterion . however , galaxies in rich clusters have rather different kinematical and morphological properties than do those in compact groups , so one might justifiably argue that small clumps of galaxies within clusters are not compact groups . a natural question is whether or not compact groups are associated with loose groups . rood & struble ( 1994 ) observed that 70% of the hcgs are located within the bounds of cataloged loose groups and clusters . studies of the distribution of galaxies in redshift space ( vennik et al 1993 , ramella et al 1994 , sakai et al 1994 , garcia 1995 , barton et al 1996 ) indicate that compact sub - condensations do occur within loose groups and filaments . vennik et al ( 1993 ) and ramella et al ( 1994 ) find that most hcgs are indeed associated with loose groups . while the above studies show that compact groups trace large - scale structure , it is also clear that they prefer low - density environments . sulentic ( 1987 ) , rood & williams ( 1989 ) , kindl ( 1990 ) , and palumbo et al ( 1995 ) have examined the surface density of galaxies surrounding the groups . they generally agree that about two - thirds groups show no statistically significant excess of nearby neighbors . this is not inconsistent with the redshift - space results because most of the hcg associations identified by ramella et al ( 1996 ) contain fewer than 5 excess galaxies . thus while compact groups are associated with loose groups and filaments , these tend to be low - density and sparsely - populated systems . are the galaxies in compact groups in any way distinct from those in their immediate environments ? rood & williams ( 1989 ) and kindl ( 1990 ) both found that compact groups , including those in rich environments , contain a significantly smaller fraction of late - type ( spiral and irregular ) galaxies than do their neighborhoods . this result is of particular importance to the question of the physical nature of compact groups , discussed below in section 6 . in addition , many independent studies have found significant differences between galaxies in compact groups and those in other environments . these are examined in section 5 . the first studies of individual compact groups ( burbidge & burbidge 1959 , 1961b , 1961c , burbidge & sargent 1971 , rose & graham 1979 , kirshner & malumuth 1980 ) indicated short dynamical times and mass - to - light ratios intermediate between those of galaxies and rich clusters . however , because of the small number of galaxies , estimates of the space velocities and physical separations of galaxies in individual groups are highly uncertain . meaningful dynamical conclusions about systems containing only four or five galaxies requires statistical analysis of large homogeneous samples . by 1992 , velocities had been measured for almost all 462 galaxies in the hcg catalog ( hickson et al 1992 ) . the distribution of galaxy velocities , relative to the median of each group , is shown in figure 2 . it can be seen that the majority of velocities fall within a roughly gaussian distribution of standard deviation @xmath10 km s@xmath3 ( the sharp peak at zero velocity results from the use of the median ) . this characteristic velocity is quite similar to velocity dispersions found in loose groups , and much smaller than typical velocity dispersions in rich clusters . in addition to the gaussian core , a flat component is seen in the velocity distribution of figure 2 . this is expected as some galaxies which are not physically related to the group will appear projected on the group by chance . this component contains about 25% of the total number of galaxies . whether of not chance projection can account for such a large number of `` discordant '' galaxies is still a matter of some debate , and is discussed further in section 6.1 . for a system of characteristic linear size @xmath11 and internal velocity @xmath12 , a characteristic dynamical time is @xmath13 . a characteristic mass density is @xmath14 , from which one can estimate the total mass within the region occupied by the galaxies . after removing galaxies whose velocities differ from the group median by more that 1000 km s@xmath3 , hickson et al ( 1992 ) found that @xmath15 and obtained a mean mass - to - light ratio of @xmath16 ( solar units ) for the hcgs . similar values were found for several shakhbazian groups ( tikhonov 1986 , amirkhanian & egikian 1987 , amirkhanian 1989 , lynds et al 1990 , amirkhanian et al 1991 ) . since the mass - to - light ratios of individual hcg galaxies is on the order of @xmath17 ( rubin et al 1991 ) , the galaxies appear to contain only @xmath18% of the total mass . the spatial distribution and luminosities of the member galaxies provides further clues to the nature of compact groups . if they are primarily projections or transient configurations , the luminosity function should be the same as that of the parent systems , and the spatial distribution of the galaxies should be consistent with a random distribution . if they are bound physical systems , the luminosity function and spatial distribution might show features that reflect the origin or subsequent evolution of compact groups . the shapes of compact groups were first investigated by arp ( 1973 ) who concluded that galaxy `` chains '' were unusually predominant . however , rose ( 1977 ) determined that the ellipticities of his groups were consistent with a random distribution of galaxies . using the larger hcg sample , hickson et al ( 1984 ) and malykh & orlov ( 1986 ) reached the same conclusion as arp the groups are typically more elongated than would be a random distribution of galaxies . an immediate consequence of this result is that compact groups can not easily be explained as random projections or chance crossings , as this would largely erase any inherent ellipticity of a parent loose group . from static simulations , hickson et al ( 1984 ) concluded that the observed ellipticities are best matched by three - dimensional shapes that are intrinsically prolate . the same result was found by oleak et al ( 1995 ) in a recent study of the shapes of 95 shakhbazian compact groups . these conclusions , however , are not unique . hickson et al ( 1984 ) also found the shapes to be consistent with those seen in dynamical simulations of compact groups seen in projection as subgroups within loose groups . in addition , one must always be concerned about possible selection biases . it may be that highly elongated groups ( such as vv 172 ) are more easily noticed in visual searches . it will be interesting to see if these results are confirmed by studies of groups found by automated searches . if the intrinsic shapes of compact groups are related to their formation process , one might expect to see a relationship between the orientation angle of a group and the environment . palumbo et al ( 1993 ) examined the environments of the hcgs , and found that the orientations of the major axes of the groups were consistent with an isotropic distribution . if compact groups are not simply projection effects , they might be expected to show a centrally - concentrated surface density profile , as is seen in clusters of galaxies . although the number of galaxies in individual compact groups is small , with a large sample it is possible to estimate a mean profile . by scaling and superimposing the hcgs , hickson et al ( 1984 ) found evidence for central concentration . mendes de oliveira & girard ( 1994 ) , using a similar analysis , concluded that the mean surface density profile is consistent with a king ( 1962 ) model with typical core radius of 15@xmath19 kpc . most recently , montoya et al ( 1996 ) have analyzed the profiles of the 42 hcg quartets which have accordant redshifts . their technique uses the distribution of projected pair separations and thus avoids assumptions about the location of the group center . they find a smaller core radius ( @xmath20 kpc for a king model ) . the fact that montoya et al ( 1996 ) find a consistent density profile for all groups , without any scaling , is particularly interesting . this would not be expected if most groups are chance alignments within loose groups . it also implies that compact groups have a unique scale , which seems counter to the concept of hierarchical clustering . montoya et al ( 1996 ) suggest that this arises as a result of a minimum mass density and velocity dispersion that is required for the groups to be virialized ( mamon 1994 ) . there have been several studies of the morphological types of galaxies in compact groups ( hickson 1982 , williams & rood 1987 , sulentic 1987 , hickson et al 1988b ) . most studies agree that the fraction @xmath21 of late type galaxies is significantly less in compact groups than in the field . hickson et al ( 1988b ) find @xmath22 for the hcgs ; prandoni et al ( 1994 ) obtain @xmath23 for the scgs . both these values are substantially lower than those found for field galaxy samples ( @xmath24 , gisler 1980 , nilson 1973 ) . also well established is morphological type concordance , observed in both the hcgs and scgs ( sulentic 1987 , hickson at al 1988b , prandoni et al 1994 ) . a given compact group is more likely to contain galaxies of a similar type ( early or late ) than would be expected for a random distribution . white ( 1990 ) has pointed out that such concordance could result from a correlation of morphological type with some other property of the group . the strongest such correlation found to date is between morphological type and velocity dispersion ( hickson et al 1988b ) . as figure 3 shows , groups with higher velocity dispersions contain fewer late - type ( gas - rich ) galaxies . they also tend to be more luminous . the importance of velocity dispersion , in addition to local density , on the galaxy morphology had previously been emphasized by de souza et al ( 1982 ) . a crucial clue is that the morphology - density relation seen in clusters and loose groups ( dressler 1980 , postman & geller 1984 , whitmore & gilmore 1992 ) is not the dominant correlation in compact groups ( hickson et al 1988b ) , although some effect is present ( mamon 1986 ) . this suggests that the velocity dispersion is more fundamental , ie of greater physical relevance to the formation and evolution of galaxies in compact groups , than is apparent physical density . there is much evidence that interaction is occurring in a large fraction of galaxies in compact groups . the strongest direct support comes from kinematical studies . rubin et al ( 1991 ) found that two thirds of the 32 hcg spiral galaxies that they observed have peculiar rotation curves . these show asymmetry , irregularity and in some cases extreme distortion , characteristic of strong gravitational interaction . this result has recently been challenged by mendes de oliveira et al ( preprint ) who obtained h@xmath25 velocity maps for 26 hcg spiral galaxies and found that only 1/3 showed abnormal rotation curves . they suggest that the difference is due to the more - complete spatial sampling of their data . in their study , rubin et al ( 1991 ) observed 12 hcg elliptical galaxies and detected nuclear emission in 11 of them . this high fraction suggests that interactions and mergers may be supplying gas to these galaxies . this idea received independent support from radio observations in which neutral hydrogen emission was detected in three compact groups which contain only elliptical galaxies ( huchtmeier 1994 ) . zepf & whitmore ( 1993 ) found that elliptical galaxies in compact groups tend to have lower internal velocity dispersions than do ellipticals in other environments having the same effective radii , absolute magnitudes and colors . they therefore do not lie on the fundamental plane defined by other elliptical galaxies . this discrepancy correlates with isophote shape in that those galaxies that have `` disky '' or irregular isophotes tend to have lower velocity dispersion . both zepf & whitmore ( 1993 ) and bettoni & fasano ( 1993 , 1995 , 1996 , fasano & bettoni 1994 ) report that hcg elliptical galaxies are less likely to have `` boxy '' isophotes , and more likely to have irregular isophotes . such effects are consistent with results of simulations of tidal encounters ( balcells & quinn 1990 ) . the luminosity function of compact groups was first estimated by heiligman & turner ( 1980 ) . they examined a sample consisting of stephan s quintet , seyfert s sextet and eight more compact groups from the arp and vorontsov - velyaminov catalogs , and concluded that compact groups contain relatively fewer faint galaxies than does a comparable field galaxy sample . analysis of the relative luminosities within individual hcgs ( hickson 1982 ) , and studies of several shakhbazian groups ( kodaira et al 1991 ) , showed a similar effect , although tikhonov ( 1987 ) found a luminosity function similar to that of field and cluster galaxies . the larger hcg sample allows the question of the galaxy content of compact groups to be addressed with greater certainty . the standard technique for determination of the luminosity function weights each galaxy by @xmath26 , where @xmath12 is the volume of the smallest geocentric sphere containing the group , and @xmath27 is the volume of the largest such sphere within which the group could have been detected . using this approach sulentic and rabaa ( 1994 ) obtained a luminosity function for hcg galaxies similar to that of field galaxies . however , mendes de oliveira and hickson ( 1991 ) argued that the standard calculation does not address the selection effects of the hcg sample . for example , the luminosity range within an individual group is limited by the 3-mag range of the selection criteria . because of this , fainter galaxies within compact groups are not included in the catalog . in order to account for such biases they used a modeling technique in which galaxies were drawn from a trial luminosity function and assigned to groups . redshifts were given to each group according to the observed distribution , and groups that failed to meet the hcg selection criteria were rejected . the luminosity distribution of the resulting galaxy sample was then compared to the observations and the process repeated with different trial luminosity functions . their best - fit luminosity function is deficient in faint galaxies , although a normal field - galaxy luminosity function is not excluded . to avoid the selection problem , ribeiro et al ( 1994 ) obtained deeper photometry for a subsample of the hcgs in order to include the fainter galaxies explicitly . since redshifts are not known for these galaxies , a correction for background contamination was made statistically . the luminosity function that they obtained is similar to that of field galaxies . most recently , the luminosity function for the rscgs has been computed by barton et al ( 1996 ) . they find it to be mildly inconsistent with that of field - galaxies , in the same sense as that of mendes de oliveira & hickson ( 1991 ) for the hcgs . figure 4 summarizes these estimates of the luminosity function of compact galaxies in terms of the schechter ( 1976 ) parameters @xmath28 and @xmath29 . how do we interpret these apparently conflicting results ? prandoni et al ( 1994 ) have argued that the hcg catalog is biased toward groups with a small magnitude range @xmath30 , because the scgs have a larger fraction of high @xmath30 groups . however , it is not known what fraction of such groups are physically real , as few redshifts have yet been obtained . such a bias could affect the luminosity function of mendes de oliveira & hickson ( 1991 ) , particularly at the faint end , but it is not evident that the bias is sufficient to account for the apparent faint - galaxy deficit . on the other hand , the small sample used by ribeiro et al ( 1994 ) may not be representative of compact groups in general . hickson ( 1997 ) points out that the ribeiro et al ( 1994 ) sample has a spiral fraction of 0.60 , substantially higher than that of the whole hcg catalogue , and contains 7 of the 16 hcgs found to be in a high density environment by palumbo et al ( 1995 ) . this suggests that the their sample has more than the usual amount of field galaxy contamination . de carvalho et al ( 1994 ) , note that the faint galaxies form a more extended distribution than do the brighter galaxies . thus they may be a dynamically distinct component , or simply unrelated field galaxies . finally , the redshift - selected rscg sample also shows mild evidence for a faint galaxy deficiency . while the faint end of the lf in compact groups appears to be depleted , there is evidence that the bright end may be enhanced . limber and matthews ( 1960 ) were the first to remark that `` the members of stephan s quintet are to be classed among the brightest of galaxies '' . it is possible that this may be in part due to interaction - induced star formation , at least for the spiral galaxies . on the other hand mendes de oliveira & hickson ( 1991 ) compared their luminosity function of elliptical galaxies in compact groups with those in the virgo and coma clusters ( as reported by sandage et al 1985 and thompson & gregory 1980 ) and found that that the compact - group ellipticals have a luminosity enhancement of more than 1 mag compared to cluster ellipticals . sulentic and rabaa ( 1994 ) find a similar enhancement in their morphological - type - specific luminosity function . this suggests that compact group elliptical galaxies may have a unique formation mechanism . from the luminosity function , one can estimate the contribution of compact groups of galaxies @xmath31 to the total galaxian luminosity density @xmath32 . mendes de oliveira & hickson ( 1991 ) obtained a ratio of @xmath33 . applying the same analysis to the luminosity function of ribeiro et al ( 1994 ) gives a ratio of 3.3% . for the rscgs , the figure is comparable : for groups of four or more galaxies , barton et al ( 1996 ) obtain a compact group abundance of @xmath34 mpc@xmath3 which leads to a luminosity density ratio of approximately 3% . these are surprisingly high figures considering the short dynamical times of most compact groups . evidence is accumulating that tidal interactions play an important role in triggering starburst activity in galaxies ( eg . maccagni et al 1990 , campos - aguilar & moles 1991 , kormendy & sanders 1992 , sanders & mirabel 1996 ) . compact groups , with their high galaxy density and evident signs of galaxy interaction should be ideal systems in which to study such effects . many hcgs do in fact contain galaxies showing starbursts or harboring active galactic nuclei ( agn ) . for example , hcg 16 is found to contain a seyfert 2 galaxy , two liners , and three starburst galaxies ( ribeiro et al 1996 ) . hcg 31 contains five galaxies showing signs of recent starburst activity ( rubin et al 1990 , iglesias - pramo & vlchez preprint ) . seyfert galaxies are also found in hcg 77 , 92 , 93 and 96 . the general degree of star formation activity in compact group galaxies can be determined from infrared observations . to date , studies have been based primarily on data from the iras satellite . hickson et al ( 1989 ) found sources in 40 hcg from a search of the point source catalog . they concluded that the ratio of far - infrared - to - optical luminosity is greater by about a factor of two in compact group galaxies , compared to that of isolated galaxies . this result was disputed by sulentic and de mello rabaa ( 1993 ) who argued that the low spatial resolution of the data made the assignment of infrared flux to individual galaxies ambiguous . they concluded that redistribution of the flux could result in little or no infrared enhancement , a conclusion echoed by venugopal ( 1995 ) . however , in cases of doubt , hickson et al ( 1989 ) identified the infrared galaxy on the basis of radio emission . the well - known correlation between infrared and radio continuum emission makes it unlikely that the results are much in error . analysis of improved data ( eg . allam et al 1996 ) should soon resolve questions about the identifications and infrared fluxes . the resolution problem can be avoided by considering the infrared colors of the sources instead of the infrared / optical ratio . zepf ( 1993 ) compared the ratio of 60 @xmath35 m to 100 @xmath35 m fluxes of compact group galaxies with those of isolated galaxies and also with those of galaxies believed to be currently merging . he found that the compact group sample was significantly different from both other samples , and estimated that about 1/3 of the compact group galaxies had warm colors ( larger 60/100 @xmath35 m ratios ) similar to those of merging galaxies . another approach to interpreting the infrared results was taken by menon ( 1991 ) who emphasized that the strong correlation between radio and infrared radiation indicates that these likely originate from a common region . in compact group spirals the radio emission is primarily nuclear whereas in isolated spirals it originates in the disk . if this is also true for the infrared flux , there must be an enhancement of the infrared / optical ratio , in the nuclear region , of more than an order of magnitude . this idea is supported by recent millimeter - wavelength observations ( menon et al 1996 ) in which co emission is detected in 55 of 70 iras - selected hcg galaxies . the inferred ratio of infrared luminosity - to - h@xmath36 mass showed an enhancement which correlates with the projected nearest - neighbor distance . further clues are provided by radio continuum studies . nonthermal emission from spiral galaxies can arise from both disk and nuclear sources . disk emission is predominantly due to supernova remnants and is thus related to the star formation rate . nuclear emission can arise both from star formation and from an active nucleus . menon ( 1995 ) observed 133 spiral galaxies in 68 hcg , and found that overall they typically show less continuum emission than those in isolated environments , which is consistent with the neutral hydrogen observations . however , when considering the nuclear regions alone , the radio emission is found to be an order of magnitude higher compared to isolated spirals . the implication is that star formation and/or agn activity is substantially enhanced in the nuclear regions of many compact group spiral galaxies . this is generally consistent with a picture in which galaxy interactions remove gas from the outer regions of galaxies , while simultaneously allowing gas to flow inwards toward the nucleus , resulting in enhanced star formation in the nuclear region , and possibly fueling an active nucleus . although there is a clear example of tidal interaction stimulating disk radio emission in at least one compact group ( menon 1995a ) , statistical evidence for a link between interactions and radio emission in compact groups is only now accumulating . if interactions are stimulating nuclear radio emission , one would expect the radio luminosity to be correlated with some index describing the degree of interaction such as the projected distance to the nearest neighbor . evidence in support of this was found by vettolani & gregorini ( 1988 ) who observed that early - type galaxies which have a high ratio of radio - to - optical emission show an excess of nearby neighbors . a similar effect was observed by malumian ( 1996 ) for spiral galaxies in groups . examining compact group galaxies , menon ( 1992 ) found that elliptical and s0 galaxies detected at a wavelength of 20 cm had closer neighbors than the undetected galaxies . the effect was not found for spiral galaxies , but if one considers only the detected galaxies , there is a significant correlation between radio - to - optical luminosity and nearest neighbor distance for both early and late type galaxies ( tk menon , private communication ) . continuum radio emission has also been detected in a number of hcg elliptical galaxies . unlike those found in cluster ellipticals , the radio sources are low - luminosity and compact . where spectral indices are available , they indicate that the radio emission arises from an agn rather than from starburst activity ( tk menon , private communication ) . in the hcg sample , there is a significant preference for radio - loud elliptical galaxies to be first - ranked optically ( menon & hickson 1985 , menon 1992 ) . the probability of radio emission does not correlate with absolute luminosity , but instead correlates with _ relative _ luminosity within a group . spiral hcg galaxies do not show this effect . although the tendency of radio galaxies in rich clusters to be first - ranked has been known for many years , it is surprising to find a similar effect in small groups , where the number of galaxies and luminosity range is small , the gravitational potential well is much less clearly defined , and it is unlikely that any individual galaxy holds a central location . the effect of optical rank on radio emission had been previously noted in other small groups by tovmasian et al ( 1980 ) although these authors made no distinction between elliptical and spiral galaxies . it is difficult to imagine any explanation for this result in which the compact group is not a true physical system . it would appear that , regardless of absolute luminosity , only the first - ranked ( presumably the most massive in the group ) elliptical galaxy can develop a radio source . stars stripped from galaxies by tidal forces should accumulate in the potential well of the group . and may be detectable as diffuse light . in an early photographic study , rose ( 1979 ) found no evidence for diffuse light in his groups , and was lead to the conclusion that most of his groups must be transient configurations . however , bergvall et al ( 1981 ) were successful in detecting ionized gas and a common halo around a compact quartet of interacting early - type galaxies , and evidence for a common halo in vv 172 was reported by sulentic & lorre ( 1983 ) . diffuse light can clearly be seen in hcg 94 , and has been found in hcg 55 ( sulentic 1987 ) , but pildis et al ( 1995b ) did not detect any in seven other compact groups . analysis by mamon ( 1986 ) indicated that while the expected diffuse light should be detectable with modern techniques , it would generally be very faint . estimates of the total amount of diffuse light in the detected groups are rather uncertain as they depend sensitively on subtraction of the galactic light , and the sky background . deeper photometry and improved image processing techniques may yet reveal diffuse light in other compact groups ( sulentic 1997 ) . the mass and distribution of cool galactic and intergalactic gas , can be obtained from observations of the 21-cm line of neutral hydrogen . the first such study of a large sample of compact groups is that of williams & rood ( 1987 ) who found a median hi mass of @xmath37 . they concluded that compact groups are typically deficient in neutral hydrogen by about a factor of two compared to loose groups . this effect is consistent with similar deficit in continuum radio emission seen in the disks of compact group spiral galaxies ( menon 1995 ) , and suggests that interactions in compact groups has removed much of the gas from the galaxies . simulations suggest that in addition to an outflow of gas , inflow also occurs which may fuel nuclear star - formation , as suggested by the strongly - enhanced radio emission seen in the nuclear regions of compact group spiral galaxies ( menon 1995 ) . high - resolution studies of individual groups ( williams & van gorkom 1988 , williams et al 1991 ) showed clearly that the gas is not confined to the galaxies . in two of three groups studied , the radio emission originates from a common envelope surrounding the group and in the third group there are signs of tidal distortion . these results strongly indicate that at least these compact groups are physically dense systems and not chance alignments or transient configurations in loose groups . they also show that many groups have evolved to the point that gas contained within individual galaxies has been distributed throughout the group . in contrast to the hi results , initial co - line observations of 15 compact - group galaxies ( boselli et al 1996 ) indicated a normalized molecular gas content similar to that of isolated spiral galaxies . however , this result is based on normalizing the flux by the optical area of the galaxy , rather than by the infrared luminosity , and may be biased by the relatively small sizes of compact - group galaxies . further co studies , currently in progress , should soon settle this question . x - ray observations of hot gas in clusters of galaxies can reveal the amount , distribution , temperature and metallicity of the gas , as well as the relative amount and distribution of the total gravitating mass . temperature , metallicity ( fraction of solar abundance ) , and bolometric luminosities are estimated by fitting a spectral model , such as that of raymond & smith ( 1977 ) to the data . x - ray emission from compact `` poor clusters '' was first reported by schwartz et al ( 1980 ) , who concluded that their x - ray properties were similar to those of rich clusters . using the einstein observatory , bahcall et al ( 1984 ) first detected x - ray emission from stephan s quintet . the x - ray map revealed that the emission is diffuse and not centered on individual galaxies . however , we now know that most of this emission is associated with a shock front rather than gas trapped in the group potential well ( sulentic et al 1995 ) . although several other groups ( bahcall et al 1984 , biermann & kronberg 1984 ) were detected by the einstein observatory , further progress required the improved sensitivity of the rosat x - ray observatory . pointed rosat observations revealed massive hydrogen envelopes surrounding the ngc 2300 group , a bright elliptical - spiral pair with two fainter members ( mulchaey et al 1993 ) , and hcg 62 , a compact quartet of early - type galaxies ( ponman & bertram 1993 ) , and showed that these systems are dominated by dark matter . subsequent investigations detected x - rays from 18 additional compact groups , either from individual galaxies , or from diffuse gas ( ebeling et al 1994 , pildis et al 1995a , sarraco & ciliegi 1995 , sulentic et al 1995 ) . these studies showed that the physical properties of individual systems span a wide range , but that the ratio of gas - to - stellar mass is significantly lower than in rich clusters . moreover , the detected compact groups all contained a majority of early - type galaxies . no spiral - rich groups were detected ( although mulchaey et al 1996b pointed out that they might be found from qso absorption spectra ) . this result is consistent with the fact that x - ray - selected groups ( henry et al 1995 ) and loose groups ( mulchaey et al 1996a ) tend to be spiral poor , and led to the suggestion that spiral - rich compact groups might not be physically dense systems at all . the most extensive x - ray study of compact groups to date is that of ponman et al ( 1996 ) . these authors combined pointed and survey - mode observations of a complete sample of 85 hcgs and detected diffuse emission in 22 groups . they conclude that , when the detection limits are considered , diffuse emission is present in at least 75% of the systems . significantly , they detected diffuse emission in several spiral - rich groups . in these the surface brightness is lower and the x - ray emission has a lower characteristic temperature , as would be expected given the lower velocity dispersions of spiral - rich compact groups . the diffuse x - ray luminosity was found to correlate with temperature , velocity dispersion , and spiral fraction , but not with optical luminosity . the last result suggests that the gas is mostly primordial and not derived from the galaxies . the correlations with temperature and velocity dispersion appear to be consistent with a single relation for clusters and groups ( figure 5 ) . the total mass in compact groups typically exceeds the stellar and gas mass by an order of magnitude . pildis et al ( 1995 ) derived baryon fractions of 12 - 19% . davis et al ( 1996 ) obtains 10 - 16% for the ngc 2300 group . these are comparable to the fractions found for poor clusters ( dellantonio et al ( 1995 ) and are about half the typical values found for rich clusters . however , the derived baryon fraction depends sensitively on the radius within which it is measured and on the assumed background level ( henriksen & mamon 1994 ) . both the total mass , which is dominated by dark matter , and the gas mass continue to increase with radius . consequently , both the baryon fraction and the gas fraction are poorly determined . the contribution of compact groups to the x - ray luminosity function has been estimated by pbeb , who find that on the order of 4% of the total luminosity in the range @xmath38 erg s@xmath3 comes from hcgs . this is higher than the contribution of hcg galaxies to the local optical luminosity density estimated at 0.8% by mendes de oliveira & hickson ( 1991 ) , but it is comparable to the value found by ribeiro et al ( 1994 ) . the metallicity inferred for the x - ray - emitting gas in compact groups is relatively low . pbeb obtain a mean metallicity of 0.18 solar , compared to the value , 0.3 - 0.4 solar , found in rich clusters . this is comparable to the low value ( @xmath39 solar ) found for the ngc 2300 group ( davis et al 1996 ) . these figures suggest that the gas is largely primordial , a result supported by the absence of a correlation between x - ray and optical luminosity . however , given the limited spectral resolution of rosat , these low metalicities can not yet be considered secure . the higher spectral resolution and sensitivity of the asca satellite should provide more definitive results . recent observations of hcg 51 and the ngc 5044 group found metal abundances comparable to those of clusters ( fukazawa et al 1996 ) . the nature of the discordant redshift members of compact groups has been a subject of debate for many years ( eg . burbidge & burbidge 1961a , burbidge & sargent 1971 , nottale & moles 1978 , sulentic 1983 ) . if the frequency of discordant galaxies is inconsistent with the statistics of chance projection , it might signify the need for new physical theories ( arp 1987 ) , or for gravitational amplification of background galaxies ( hammer & nottale 1986 ) . initial estimates of the chance probability of finding discordant galaxies in groups like stephan s quintet , seyfert s sextet and vv 172 , were very small ( burbidge & sargent 1971 ) . however , such probabilities were recognized to be difficult to determine reliably , because the a priori probability of _ any _ particular configuration of galaxies is also very small ( burbidge & sargent 1971 ) . only with a well - defined sample of groups and a complete characterization of selection effects , can meaningful estimates of the probabilities be made . the explicit selection criteria of the hcg catalog in principal makes this sample suitable for a quantitative statistical investigation of the discordant - redshift question . sulentic ( 1987 ) first concluded that the number of discordant redshifts in the catalog is too large to explain by chance . on the other hand , hickson et al 1988a and mendes de oliveira ( 1995 ) , applying the selection criteria more rigorously , found no strong statistical evidence for this . their result , however , may be biased by incompleteness in the hcg catalog : there seem to be too - few low surface brightness groups in the catalog , and the `` missing '' groups may have a higher fraction of discordant redshifts ( sulentic 1997 ) . in order to address the incompleteness issue , iovino & hickson ( 1996 ) combined observational results from both the hcg and scg catalogs with monte - carlo simulations . their technique exploits the unbiased nature of the scg catalog and the complete redshift coverage of the hcg sample . they conclude that for all except the two highest - surface - brightness quintets ( stephan s quintet and seyfert s sextet ) , the number of discordant redshifts is consistent with chance projections . for these two , the chance probabilities are low . however , for both of these systems there is independent physical evidence that the discordant galaxies are at the cosmological distances that correspond to their redshifts and are therefore not group members ( kent 1981 , wu et al 1994 ) . one should not assume that the situation is now completely settled . further studies will be possible when redshifts have been obtained for the scg galaxies . there are still other questions that have not been adequately addressed , such as reported redshift quantization ( cocke & tifft 1983 ) . however , at this point it appears that the frequency of discordant galaxies does not require a new interpretation of galaxy redshifts . in fact , physical evidence suggests the opposite . the discordant galaxies all have physical properties consistent with a cosmological distance . for example those with higher redshift tend to be smaller and fainter than other members of the group , and vice versa ( mendes de oliveira 1995 ) . because we can measure only three phase - space dimensions for galaxies in compact groups ( two components of position and one of velocity ) , the groups are subject to projection effects . because of this , they may not be physically dense , or even physically related systems . the following interpretations have so far been suggested for compact groups : 1 . transient dense configurations ( rose 1977 ) 2 . isolated bound dense configurations ( sulentic 1987 , hickson & rood 1988 ) 3 . chance alignments in loose groups ( mamon 1986 , walke & mamon 1989 , mamon 1995 ) 4 . filaments seen end - on ( hernquist et al 1995 ) 5 . bound dense configurations within loose groups ( diaferio et al 1994 , governato et al 1996 ) evidence for and against physical association and high density in the hcg sample , to 1988 , was summarized by hickson & rood ( 1988 ) , and by walke and mamon ( 1989 ) respectively . since that time , several new results have emerged . from an analysis of optical images , mendes de oliveira & hickson ( 1994 ) concluded that 43% of all hcg galaxies show morphological features indicative of interaction and/or merging , and that 32% of all hcgs contain three or more interacting galaxies . these percentages are likely to rise with more - detailed studies and sophisticated image analysis ( longo et al 1994 ) . this high frequency of interactions observed in compact groups is difficult to reconcile with the chance alignment and filament hypotheses , even if the alignments contain physical binaries ( mamon 1995 ) . the high fraction of hcgs showing diffuse x - ray emission is very strong evidence that a large fraction of these systems are physically dense , and are not transient configurations or projection effects . although the exact numbers are not final , due to the faintness of the sources and the problems of contamination by sources associated with the individual galaxies , it seems evident that many groups are dense bound systems . the correlations seen between x - ray and optical properties , and the fact that the x - ray properties of compact groups are not inconsistent with those of clusters reinforces this conclusion . ostriker et al ( 1995 ) have argued that the relatively low x - ray luminosities of compact groups might not be due to a low gas fraction , but instead could be understood if the groups are filaments seen in projection ( hernquist et al 1995 ) . however , ponman et al ( 1996 ) point out that in order to explain even the fainter compact groups , gas temperatures @xmath40 kev and densities @xmath41 @xmath42 would be required . these appear to be ruled out by both observations ( briel & henry 1995 ) and simulations ( diaferio et al 1995 , pildis et al 1996 ) . even if compact groups are physically dense , they may not be as dense as they appear . as mentioned in section 2 , a sample of groups selected on the basis of high apparent density will be biased by the inclusion of looser systems which appear more compact due to geometrical or kinematic effects . is this bias large ? its magnitude can be estimated as follows : consider @xmath43 galaxies randomly located within a circle of radius @xmath11 on the sky . what is the probability @xmath44 that they will fall within some circular subarea of radius @xmath45 ? the answer can be obtained using analytic expressions derived by walke & mamon ( 1989 ) . from their equations 1 and 6 ( setting @xmath46 and @xmath47 ) we obtain f(x , n ) = n!^n _ 0^x dr _ 0 ^ 1-r d where dn = 2^n-1 n r^2n-3(n-2 ) ! 2ddr is the number of possible configurations with radius between @xmath48 and @xmath49 and distance from the center between @xmath50 and @xmath51 . here we have neglected a small edge contribution that is unimportant for small values of @xmath52 ( walke and mamon s case 3 ) . this gives f(x , n ) = n^2 x^2n-2 now , an observer would infer a galaxy space density that is higher by a factor @xmath53 , so the average apparent space density enhancement is < > & = & _ 0 ^ 1 dx + & = & _ 0 ^ 1 n^2 x^2n-5 dx + & = & 2n^2(n-1)(2n-5)(2n-3)(n-2 ) thus we expect to typically overestimate the space density by about a factor of 12.0 for triplets ( or quartets containing a physical binary ) , 3.2 for true quartets and 2.0 for quintets . a key question that remains is the position of compact groups in the clustering hierarchy . are compact groups distinct entities ( sulentic 1987 ) or an intermediate stage between loose groups and triplets , pairs and individual galaxies ( barnes 1989 , white 1990 , cavaliere et al 1991 , rampazzo & sulentic 1992 , diaferio et al 1994 ) . some compact groups are purely projection effects , others may be small clusters ( ebeling et al 1995 ) , but most appear to be real . it seems that they can arise naturally from subcondensations in looser groups , but further studies are needed to better determine both the observed space density of groups as a function of population and the timescales involved in the evolutionary process . this question is related to that of the formation mechanism of compact groups . two mechanisms have been discussed in the literature . diaferio et al ( 1994 ) conclude that compact groups form continually from bound subsystems within loose groups . this gains some support from the observation ( see section 3 ) that most hcgs are embedded in loose groups , although it is not obvious that these loose groups are sufficiently rich ( sulentic 1997 ) . governato et al ( 1996 ) , proposed a model in which merging activity in compact groups is accompanied by infall of galaxies from the environment . this naturally explains the observed mix of morphological types , and it allows compact groups to persist for longer times . where do the shakhbazian groups fit in this picture ? recent studies ( tikhonov 1986 , amirkhanian & egikian 1987 , amirkhanian et al 1988 , 1991 , amirkhanian 1989 , kodaira et al 1988 - 91 , stoll et al 1993 - 1996 ) show that these objects are typically compact clusters or groups of early - type galaxies . although the systems were selected on the basis of red colors and compact appearance of their galaxies , both of these factors result from their large distances because k - corrections and contrast effects become significant . the galaxies are in fact relatively normal , although luminous ( del olmo et al 1995 ) . however , the number of blue ( gas rich ) galaxies in these systems does seem to be very small . thus it appears the shakhbazian groups are mostly small clusters , possibly intermediate in physical properties between classical compact groups and clusters . if the groups are dynamically bound , galaxy mergers should commence within a few dynamical times ( carnevali et al 1981 , ishizawa et al 1983 , barnes 1985 , ishizawa 1986 , mamon 1987 , 1990 , zheng et al 1993 ) . both n - body and hydrodynamic simulations indicate that the dark matter halos of individual galaxies merge first , creating a massive envelope within which the visible galaxies move ( barnes 1984 , bode et al 1993 ) . kinematic studies of loose groups ( eg . puche & carignan 1991 ) indicate that the dark matter is concentrated around the individual optical galaxies . in contrast , the x - ray observations indicate that in most compact groups , the gas and dark matter is more extended and is decoupled from the galaxies . this may explain the observation that galaxies in compact groups typically have mass - to - light ratios 30% to 50% lower than more isolated galaxies ( rubin et al 1991 ) . is there any observational evidence that galaxies in compact groups are merging ? by 1982 it was evident that first - ranked galaxies in compact groups did not appear to be merger products , because the fraction of first - ranked galaxies that are type e or s0 is the same as for the general population of hcg galaxies ( hickson 1982 ) . if mergers were a dominant effect , the first - ranked galaxies would be expected to be more often elliptical . the same conclusion was reached by geller & postman ( 1983 ) who found that the luminosities of first - ranked galaxies were consistent with a single luminosity distribution for all group galaxies . of course this may just mean that in small groups the first - ranked galaxy is not necessarily the most evolved . rather , one should ask if _ any _ galaxies in compact groups show indications of merging . the relative paucity of merging galaxies in compact groups was first noted by tikhonov ( 1987 ) , from a visual inspection of optical images . zepf & whitmore ( 1991 ) realized that elliptical galaxies formed by recent mergers of gas - rich systems should have bluer colors than normal . examining the hcgs , they found only a small enhancement in the fraction of early - type galaxies having blue colors , a conclusion reinforced by an independent study by moles et al ( 1994 ) . on the other hand , caon et al ( 1994 ) argued that the large effective radii of compact group elliptical galaxies is indicative of an origin by merging or accretion of companions . zepf ( 1993 ) estimated that roughly 7% of the galaxies in compact groups are in the process of merging . this conclusion was based on roughly consistent frequencies of _ ( a ) _ optical signatures of merging , _ ( b ) _ warm far - infrared colors , and _ ( c ) _ sinusoidal rotation curves . however , few galaxies show all of these effects simultaneously . the merging fraction may thus be as high as 25% if one allows that any one of these criteria would be considered to be sufficient to indicate a merger ( hickson 1997 ) . given the small numbers of objects in these studies , it is fair to say that the fraction of merging galaxies is highly uncertain at present . it seems safe to conclude that current observations do not rule out a significant amount of merging in compact groups . detailed studies of individual compact groups can be quite revealing . many galaxies that at first appear normal are revealed to have peculiar morphology or spectra when examined more closely . many , perhaps most , compact groups clearly contain galaxies that are dynamically interacting . however , the groups likely span a range of evolutionary states . at the extreme end are high - density groups like seyfert s sextet , hcg 31 , hcg 62 , hcg 94 ( pildis 1995 ) and hcg 95 ( rodrigue et al 1995 ) in which we find strong gravitational interactions . at the other end are lower density compact groups , such as hcg 44 , which most likely are in a less - advanced stage of evolution . this picture is supported by radio observations : seyfert s sextet and hcg 31 are both embedded in extended hi clouds whereas in hcg 44 the hi is associated with individual galaxies ( williams et al 1991 ) . it seems clear that the groups as we now see them can persist for only a fraction of a hubble time . simulations indicate that merging should destroy the group on a time scale @xmath54 that is typically an order of magnitude larger than @xmath55 , depending on the distribution of dark matter ( cavaliere et al 1983 , barnes 1984 , navarro et al 1987 , kodaira et al 1990 ) and initial conditions ( governato et al 1991 ) . assuming that the groups are in fact bound dynamical systems , we can draw two conclusions : _ ( a ) _ there must be an ongoing mechanism for forming or replacing compact groups , and _ ( b ) _ there must be a significant population of relics of merged groups . what are the end - products of compact groups ? it is tempting to identify them with field elliptical galaxies , following a suggestion first made by toomre ( 1977 ) . simulations ( weil & hernquist 1994 ) indicate that multiple mergers in small groups of galaxies best reproduce the observed kinematical properties of elliptical galaxies . the resulting galaxies are predicted to possess small kinematic misalignments , which can be detected by detailed spectroscopic and photometric studies . neverthess , it remains to be demonstrated that these merger remnants can reproduce the tight correlation between size , luminosity and velocity dispersion found in present - day elliptical galaxies . if compact groups have lifetimes on the order of @xmath54 , and form continuously , then the number of relics , per observed group , is expected to be on the order of @xmath56 . thus , the number of relics could exceed that of present day groups by as much as an order of magnitude . mamon ( 1986 ) estimated that , if all hcgs are real , then the relics would account for about 25% of luminous field elliptical galaxies . as we have seen , the true space density of compact groups is uncertain by at least a factor of two , and may be underestimated because of selection biases . there is then the potential problem of producing too many relics . a second problem is the fact that the integrated luminosities of compact groups are typically a factor of three to four times greater than luminosities of isolated elliptical galaxies ( sulentic and rabaa 1994 ) . it is possible that interaction - induced star formation has boosted the luminosities of some compact - group galaxies , and that some degree of fading of the merger product is expected . however , at this point it is not clear whether or not the relics can be identified with isolated elliptical galaxies . despite these problems , a fossil compact group may have actually been found . ponman et al ( 1995 ) have detected a luminous isolated elliptical galaxy surrounded by diffuse x - ray emission which is consistent with the expected end - product of a compact group . if more objects like this are found , it may be possible to compare their space density with that expected for compact group relics . interactions are often implicated in the development of active nuclei in galaxies ( eg . freudling & almudena prieto 1996 ) . the hcg catalog includes several examples of compact groups containing both starburst galaxies and agn . several recent examples of associations between starburst galaxies or agn and what appear to be compact groups have been reported : del olmo & moles ( 1991 ) have found a broad - line agn in shakhbazian 278 ; zou et al ( 1995 ) find that the luminous infrared source iras 23532 coincides with a compact group that includes a seyfert 1 as well as a starburst galaxy . if this association extends to qsos , one would expect to find numerous compact groups at redshifts @xmath57 , where the comoving number density of qsos peaks ( eg . hartwick & schade 1984 ) . the tendency for qsos to have close companions has been known for some time ( eg . stockton 1982 , bahcall et al 1997 ) . recently , several examples of compact groups associated with luminous infrared galaxies , agn and qsos at @xmath58 have been found using hst ( pascarelle et al 1996 , francis et al 1996 , matthews et al 1994 , tsuboi & nakai 1994 , hutchings 1995 , hutchings et al 1995 ) . these observations provide support to the idea that tidally - triggered star formation is a predominant factor in the galaxy formation process ( lacey & silk 1991 , lacey et al 1993 ) . in this model disk star formation occurs relatively late , after the compact group has formed and tidal interactions are strong . this seems at least qualitatively consistent with the fragmentary nature of high - redshift galaxies observed with the hubble space telescope ( schade et al 1995 ) , although these fragments appear to be much less luminous and more irregular than most present - day compact group galaxies . the model also offers a possible explanation for the excess numbers of faint blue galaxies found in field galaxy count as dwarf galaxies undergoing star formation at a redshift of @xmath59 . compact groups may possibly play a role in the formation of other systems . we have seen that giant galaxies may be formed as the end product of compact - group evolution . at the other end of the scale , dwarf galaxies have physical properties distinct from normal galaxies , which suggests a unique formation mechanism . one possibility is that they form during gravitational interactions from tidal debris ( duc & mirabel 1994 ) . if this is the case , one would expect to find evidence for this in compact groups of galaxies . from an examination of condensations in tidal tails , hunsberger et al ( 1996 ) concluded that the fraction of dwarf galaxies produced within tidal debris in compact groups is not negligible . there is also evidence that star clusters form from tidal debris . longo et al ( 1995 ) have found an excess population of unresolved blue objects around hcg 90 which appear to be recently formed star clusters . these may be similar to the population of new star clusters recently reported in the merger remnant ngc 7252 ( whitmore et al 1993 ) . because compact groups have a high galaxy surface density , they may form effective gravitational lenses . gravitational amplification of background field galaxies was proposed by hammer and nottale ( 1986 ) as a possible explanation for the presence of the high - redshift discordant member of this group . mendes de oliveira and giraud ( 1994 ) and montoya et al ( 1996 ) find that most hcgs are too nearby to produce strong lensing effects . however , because the critical mass density required for strong lensing depends reciprocally on distance , analogous systems 5 - 10 times more distant should produce a non - negligible fraction of giant arcs . studies of small groups may provide clues to the overall structure of the universe . the baryon fractions found in clusters of galaxies appear to be inconsistent with a density parameter @xmath60 , unless the dark matter is more prevalent outside clusters ( white 1992 , babul & katz 1993 ) . compact groups provide a means to study dark matter in such regions . the baryon fractions found for compact groups do appear to be lower than those for clusters . david et al ( 1995 ) argued that the gas is the most extended component ; galaxies being the most compact and the dark matter being intermediate . they concluded that the baryon fraction approaches 30% on large enough scales , which is comparable to the values found for clusters . given the constraints of standard big - bang nucleosynthesis this would imply that the density parameter @xmath61 is at most 0.2 . on the other hand , the infall picture of compact - group evolution ( governato et al 1996 ) requires a high - density @xmath62 universe . in a low - density universe the infall rate is insufficient . as there is at present no other clear mechanism for avoiding the overproduction of relics by merging compact groups , this may be a strong argument for a high - density universe . during the last two decades we have seen a resurgence of interest in compact groups . while initially little more than a curiosity , these systems are now viewed as potentially important sites of dynamical evolution , shaping the structure of many galaxies . it now seems clear that while many compact groups are contaminated by projections , a large fraction of at least the high - surface - brightness hcgs are physically dense . they form by gravitational relaxation processes within looser associations of galaxies . the densest are generally in an advanced stage of evolution characterized by strong interactions , starburst and agn activity , stripping of stellar and dark matter halos , and merging . they contain large amounts of dark matter and primordial x - ray - emitting gas trapped within the gravitational potential well . despite this progress , many questions remain unanswered . what are the end products of compact group evolution , and do they have properties consistent with any know population of objects ? what is the space density of such relics ? where do compact groups fit in the overall clustering hierarchy ? what is their role in the evolution of galaxies both past and present ? given the current interest and research activity in this area , it is likely that many of these questions may soon be addressed . it is a pleasure to thank the observatories of brera and capodimonte for hospitality during the initial work on this review . i have benefitted from discussions with many individuals , but i would like to acknowledge particularly the contributions of a iovino , e kindl , g longo , g mamon , c mendes de oliveira , tk menon , g palumbo , h rood , and j sulentic . i thank g mamon , a sandage and j sulentic for providing helpful comments on an earlier version of the manuscript . financial support was provided by the natural sciences and engineering research council of canada and nato . [ a]llam s , assendorp r , longo g , braun m , richter g. 1996 . _ _ 117:39 - 82 [ a]mbartsumian ba 66:536 - 40 [ a]mirkhanian as . 1989 . ssr bjurak . 61:25 - 28 [ a]mirkhanian as , egikian ag . 1987 . _ astrofizika _ 27:395 - 97 [ a]mirkhanian as , egikian ag , silchenko ok . _ pisma astron . zh . _ 14:404 - 08 [ a]mirkhanian as , eghikian ag , tikhonov na , shakhbazian rk . _ astrofizika _ 35:67 - 75 [ a]rp h. 1966 . _ ap . j. suppl . _ 14:1 - 20 [ a]rp h. 1973 . _ 185:797 - 808 [ a]rp h. 1987 . _ quasars , redshifts and controversies _ , berkeley : interstellar media [ b]abul a , katz n. 1993 . _ ap . j. lett . _ 406:l51-l54 [ b]ahcall jn , kirharos s , saxe dh , schneider dp . 1997 . _ ap . j. _ 479 , in press [ b]ahcall na , harris de , rood hj . _ 284:l29-l33 [ b]aier fw , petrosian , mb , tiersch h , shakhbazian rk . _ astrofizika _ 10:327 - 35 [ b]aier fw , tiersch h. 1975 . _ astrofizika _ 11:221 - 28 [ b]aier fw , tiersch h. 1976 . _ astrofizika _ 12:7 - 12 [ b]aier fw , tiersch h. 1976 . _ astrofizika _ 12:409 - 15 [ b]aier fw , tiersch h. 1978 . _ astrofizika _ 14:279 - 82 [ b]aier fw , tiersch h. 1979 . _ astrofizika _ 15:33 - 35 [ b]alcells n , quinn pj . j. _ 361:381 - 93 [ b]arnes j. 1984 . _ mnras _ 208:873 - 85 [ b]arnes je . _ mnras _ 215:517 - 36 [ b]arnes je . 1989 . _ nature _ 338:123 - 26 [ b]arton e , geller mj , ramella m , marzke ro , da costa ln . 112:871 - 86 [ b]ergvall n , ekman a , lauberts a. 1981 . _ astron . _ 95:266 - 77 [ b]ettoni d , fasano g. 1993 . 105:1291 - 307 [ b]ettoni d , fasano g. 1995 . _ astron . j. _ 109:32 - 55 [ b]ettoni d , fasano g. 1996 . _ _ 118:429 - 39 [ b]iermann p , kronberg pp . 1984 . _ physica scr . _ t7:169 [ b]ode pw , cohn hn , lugger pm . 1993 . _ ap . j. _ 416:17 - 25 [ b]oselli a , mendes de oliveira c , balkowski c , cayatte v , casoli f. 1996 . _ 314:738 - 44 [ b]riel ug , henry jp . 1995 . astrophys . _ 302:l9-l12 [ b]urbidge em . , burbidge gr . 130:23 - 25 [ b]urbidge em . , burbidge gr 66:541 - 50 [ b]urbidge em . , burbidge gr . 1961b . _ ap . j. _ 134:244 - 47 [ b]urbidge em . , burbidge gr . 1961c . _ ap . j. _ 134:248 - 56 [ b]urbidge em , sargent wlw . 1971 . 35:351 - 78 [ c]ampos - aguilar a , moles m. 1991 . _ 241:358 - 64 [ c]aon n , capaccioli m , donofrio m , longo g. 1994 . astrophys . _ 286:l39-l42 [ c]arnevali p , cavaliere a , santangelo p. 1981 . _ ap . j. _ 249:449 - 61 [ c]avaliere a , colafrancesco s , scaramella , r. 1991 . _ ap . j. _ 380:15 - 23 [ c]avaliere a , santangelo p , tarquini g , vittorio n. 1983 . in _ clustering in the universe , d gerbal , a mazure , pp . gif - sur - yvette : ed . front . [ c]ocke wj , tifft wg . _ ap . j. _ 268:56 - 59 [ d]a costa ln , geller mj , pellegrini ps , latham dw , fairall ap , marzke ro , willmer cna , huchra jp , calderon jh , ramella m , kurtz mj , _ ap . j. lett . _ 424:l1-l4 [ d]avid lp , jones c , forman w. 1995 . _ ap . j. _ 445:578 - 90 [ d]avis ds , mulchaey js , mushotzky rf , burstein d. 1996 . _ ap . j. _ 460:601 - 11 [ d]e carvalho rr , djorgovski sg 1995 . soc . _ 187:53.02 [ d]e carvalho rr , ribeiro alb , zepf se . _ 93:47 - 63 [ d]ellantonio ip , geller mj , fabricant dg . 1995 . 110:502 - 12 [ d]el olmo a , moles m. 1991 . _ 245:27 - 30 [ d]el olmo a , moles m , perera j. 1995 . in _ groups of galaxies _ , asp conference series , 70:117 - 126 [ d]e souza re , capelato hv , arakaki l , logullo c. 1982 . _ ap . j. _ 263:557 - 63 [ d]iaferio a , geller mj , ramella m. 1994 . _ astron . j. _ 107:868 - 79 [ d]iaferio a , geller mj , ramella m. 1995 . 109:2293 - 304 [ d]ressler a. 1980 . _ ap . j. _ 236:351 - 65 [ d]uc p - a , mirabel if . 1994 . _ , 289:83 - 93 [ e]beling h , mendes de oliveira c , white da . 1995 . _ mnras _ 277:1006 - 32 [ e]beling h , voges w , boehringer h. 1994 . _ ap . j. _ 436:44 - 55 [ f]asano g , bettoni d. 1994 . _ astron . 107:1649 - 67 [ _ ap . j. _ ] 457:490 - 99 [ f]reudling w , almudena prieto m. 1996 . _ _ 306:39 - 48 [ f]ukazawa y , makishima k , matsushita k , yamasaki n , ohashi t , et al _ 48:395 - 407 [ g]arcia a. 1995 . _ 297:56 - 60 [ g]eller mj , postman m. 1983 . _ ap . j. _ 274:31 - 38 [ g]isler g. 1980 . 85:623 - 25 [ g]overnato f , chincarini g , bhatia r. 1991 . _ ap . j. _ 371:l15-l18 [ g]overnato f , tozzi , p , cavaliere a. 1996 . _ ap . j. _ 458:18 - 26 [ h]ammer f , nottale l. 1986 . _ 155:420 - 22 [ h]eiligman gm , turner el . 1980 . _ ap . j. _ 236:745 - 49 [ h]enriksen mj , mamon ga . 1994 . _ ap . j. lett . _ 421:l63-l66 [ h]enry jp , gioia i m , huchra jp , burg r , mclean b , et al . 1995 . _ ap . j. _ 449:422 - 30 [ h]ernquist l , katz n , weinberg dh . 1995 . _ ap . j. _ 442:57 - 60 [ h]ickson p. 1982 . _ ap . j. _ 255:382 - 91 [ h]ickson p. 1990 . in _ paired and interacting galaxies , _ int . astron . union colloq . huntsville , al : nasa marshall space flight center [ h]ickson p. 1993 . _ ap . lett . & commun . _ 29:1 - 207 [ h]ickson p. 1994 . _ atlas of compact groups of galaxies _ , basel : gordon & breach [ h]ickson p. 1997 . _ ap . lett . & commun . _ in press [ h]ickson p , kindl e , huchra jp . 1988a . _ ap . j. _ 329:l65-l67 [ h]ickson p , kindl e , huchra jp . 1988b . _ ap . 331:64 - 70 [ h]ickson p , kindl e , auman jr . _ 70:687 - 98 [ h]ickson p , mendes de oliveira c , huchra jp , palumbo gg 399:353 - 67 [ h]ickson p , menon tk , palumbo ggc , persic m. 1989 . _ ap . 341:679 - 84 [ h]ickson p , ninkov z , huchra jp , mamon ga . 1984 . in _ clusters and groups of galaxies _ , ed . f mardirossian , g giuricin , m mezzetti , pp . dordrecht : reidel [ h]ickson p , richstone do , turner el . 213:323 - 26 [ h]ickson p , rood hj . 1988 . _ ap . j. _ 331:l69-l72 [ h]uchtmeier w. 1994 . _ 286:389 - 94 [ h]unsberger sd , charlton jc , zaritsky d. 1996 . _ ap . j. _ 462:50 - 56 [ h]umason ml , mayall nu , sandage ar . 1956 . 61:97 [ h]utchings jb 1995 . 109:928 - 34 [ h]utchings jb , crampton d , johnson a. 1995 . 109:73 - 80 [ i]ovino a , hickson p. 1996 . _ mnras _ in press [ i]shizawa t. 1986 . _ astrophys . space sci . _ 119:221 - 25 [ i]shizawa t , matsumoto r , tajima t , kageyama h , sakai h. 1983 . _ 35:61 - 76 [ k]ent sm _ 93:554 - 57 [ k]indl e. 1990 . a photometric and morphological study of compact groups of galaxies and their environments , ph.d . thesis , university of british columbia , vancouver , canada , 168 pp . [ k]irshner rp , malumuth em . 236:366 - 72 [ k]iseleva lg , orlov vv . 1993 . _ vistas astron . _ 36:1 - 30 [ k]odaira k , doi m , ichikawa s - i , okamura s. 1990 . _ 1:283 - 95 [ k]odaira k , iye m , okamura s , stockton a. 1988 . _ 40:533 - 45 [ k]odaira k , sekiguchi m , sugai h , doi m. 1991 . _ 43:169 - 76 , [ k]ormendy j , sanders db . 390:l53 - 56 [ l]acey c , guiderdoni b , rocca - volmerange b , silk j. 1993 . _ 402:15 - 41 [ l]acey c , silk j. 1991 . _ 381:14 - 32 [ l]imber dn , mathews wg . 132:286 - 305 [ l]ongo g , busarello g , lorenz h , richter g , zaggia s. 1994 . _ astron . astrophys . _ 282:418 - 24 [ l]ongo g , grimaldi a , richter g. 1995 . astrophys . _ 299:l45-l48 [ l]ynds cr , khachikian ee , amirkhanian as . _ pisma astron . zh . _ 16:195 - 98 [ m]accagni d , gioia i m , henry jp , maccacaro t , vettolani gp 100:1461 - 67 [ m]alumian vh . 1996 . 317:101 [ m]alykh sa , orlov vv . 1986 . _ astrofizika _ 24:445 - 51 [ m]amon ga . 307:426 - 30 [ m]amon ga j. _ 321:622 - 44 , [ m]amon ga . _ 219:98 - 100 [ m]amon ga . 1990 . in _ paired and interacting galaxies , _ int . union colloq . huntsville , al : nasa marshall space flight center [ m]amon ga . 1995 . in _ groups of galaxies , _ asp conf . 70:83 - 94 [ m]arzke ro , huchra jp , geller mj . 1944 . _ ap . j. _ 428:43 - 50 [ m]assey p. 1977 . _ 89:13 - 18 [ m]atthews k , soifer bt , nelson j , boesgaard h , graham jr . , et al . _ 420:l13-l16 [ m]endes de oliveira c. 1995 . _ mnras _ 273:139 - 45 [ m]endes de oliveira c , giraud e. 1994 . _ ap . j. _ 437:l103-l106 [ m]endes de oliveira c , hickson p. 1991 . _ ap . 380:30 - 38 [ m]endes de oliveira c , hickson p. 1994 . _ ap . j. _ 427:684 - 95 [ m]enon tk . 372:419 - 23 [ m]enon tk _ mnras _ 255:41 - 47 [ m]enon tk 110:2605 - 9 [ m]enon tk _ mnras _ 274:845 - 852 [ m]enon tk , hickson , p. 1985 . _ j. _ 296 , 60 - 64 , [ m]enon tk , leon s , combes f. 1996 . _ bull . am . 188:4502 [ m]irzoian lv , miller js , osterbrock de . 1975 , _ ap . 196:687 - 8 [ m]oles m , del olmo a , perea j , masegosa j , marquez i , costa , v. 1994 . _ _ 285:404 - 14 [ m]ulchaey js , davis ds , mushotzky rf , burstein d. 1993 . _ ap . j. lett . _ 404:l9-l12 [ m]ulchaey js , davis ds , mushotzky rf , burstein d. 1996a . _ ap . 456:80 - 97 [ m]ulchaey js , mushotzky rf , burstein d , davis ds . 1996b . _ ap . j. lett . _ 456:l5-l8 [ n]avarro jf , mosconi m , garcia lambas d. 1987 . _ mnras _ 228:501 - 11 [ n]ilson pn . _ uppsala general catalogue of galaxies , _ uppsala obs . [ n]ottale l , moles m. 1978 . _ 66 , 355 - 58 [ o]leak h , stoll d , tiersch h , macgillivray h. 1995 . 109:1485 - 89 [ o]striker jp , lubin lm , hernquist l. 1995 . _ j. _ 444:l61-l64 [ o]striker jp , tremaine sd . _ 202:l113-l117 [ p]alumbo ggc , saracco p , hickson p , mendes de oliveira c , 1995 . 109:1476 - 84 [ p]alumbo ggc , saracco p , mendes de oliveira c , hickson p , tornatore v , baiesi - pillastrini gc . 1993 . _ ap . j. _ 405:413 - 18 [ p]alumbo g , saracco p , hickson p , mendes de oliveira c. 1995 . _ astron . 109:1476 - 84 [ p]ascarelle sm , windhorst ra , driver sp , ostrander ej , keel wc . 1996 . _ ap . j. lett . _ 456:l21-l24 [ p]eebles pje . _ physical cosmology . _ princeton : princeton univ . press [ p]etrosian mb . 1974 . _ astrofizika _ 10:471 - 76 [ p]etrosian mb . _ astrofizika _ 14:631 - 35 [ p]ildis ra . 455:492 - 96 [ p]ildis ra , bregman jn , evrard ae . 1995a . _ ap . j. _ 443:514 - 26 [ p]ildis ra , bregman jn , schombert jm 110:1498 - 506 [ p]ildis ra , evrard ae , bregman jn . 1996 . 112:378 - 87 [ p]onman tj , bertram d. 1993 . _ nature _ 363:51 - 54 [ p]onman tj , allan dj , jones lr , merrifield m , mchardy i m , lehto hj , luppino ga . _ nature _ 369:462 - 64 [ p]onman tj , bourner pdj , ebeling h , bohringer h. 1996 . _ mnras _ 283:690 - 708 [ p]ostman m , geller mj . 1984 . _ 281:95 - 99 [ p]randoni i , iovino a , macgillivray ht . 107:1235 - 44 [ p]ress wh , schechter p. 1974 . _ ap . j. _ 187:425 - 38 [ p]uche d , carignan c. 1991 . _ ap . j. _ 378:487 - 95 [ r]amella m , diaferio a , geller mj , huchra jp . 1994 . _ astron . 107:1623 - 28 [ r]ampazzo r , sulentic jw . 1992 . _ astron . astrophys . _ 259:43 - 60 [ r]aymond jc , smith bw _ 35:419 - 39 [ r]ibeiro alb , de carvalho rr , zepf se . 1994 . _ mnras _ 267:l13-l16 [ r]ibeiro alb , de carvalho rr , coziol r , capelato hv , zepf se . _ 463:l5-l8 [ r]odrigue m , schultz a , thompson j , colegrove t , spight ld , et al . 109:2362 - 67 [ r]ood hj , struble mf . 1994 . _ 106:413 - 16 [ r]ood hj , williams ba 339:772 - 82 [ r]ose ja . 211:311 - 18 [ r]ose ja 231:10 - 22 [ r]ose ja , graham ja . 1979 . _ ap . j. _ 231:320 - 26 [ r]ubin vc , ford wkj , hunter da . 1990 . _ ap . j. _ 365:86 - 92 [ r]ubin vc , hunter da , ford wkj . 1991 . _ ap . j. suppl . _ 76:153 - 83 [ s]akai s , giovanelli r , wegner g. 1994 . 108:33 - 43 [ s]andage a , binggeli b & tammann ga . 90:1759 - 71 [ s]anders db , mirabel if . 1996 . _ 34:749 - 92 [ s]aracco p , ciliegi p. 1995 . _ astron . _ 301:348 - 58 [ s]argent wlw _ 153:l135 - 37 [ s]chade d , lilly sj , crampton d , hammer f , le fevre o , tresse l. 1995 . _ j. _ 451:l1-l4 [ s]chechter p. 1976 . _ ap . 203:297 - 306 [ s]chwartz da , schwarz j , tucker w. 1980 . _ ap . j. _ 238:l59-l62 [ s]eyfert ck . j. _ 53:203 - 4 [ s]hakhbazian rk 1957 . _ 177:11 [ s]hakhbazian rk 1973 . _ astrofizika _ 9:495 - 501 [ s]hakhbazian rk , amirkhanian as . 1979 . _ astrofizika _ 14:455 - 66 [ s]hakhbazian rk , petrosian mb . _ astrofizika _ 10:13 - 20 [ s]tephan me . mnras _ 37:334 - 39 [ s]tockton a. 1982 . _ 257:33 - 39 [ s]toll d , tiersch h , oleak h , baier f , macgillivray ht . 1993a . _ 314:225 - 67 [ s]toll d , tiersch h , oleak h , baier f , macgillivray ht . 1993b . _ 314:317 - 60 [ s]toll d , tiersch h , oleak h , macgillivray ht _ 315:11 - 61 [ s]toll d , tiersch h , oleak h , macgillivray ht . 1994b . _ 315:97 - 150 [ s]toll d , tiersch h , braun m. 1996a . _ 317:239 - 57 [ s]toll d , tiersch h , braun m. 1996b . _ 317:315 - 32 [ s]ulentic jw . 1983 . _ 270:417 - 21 [ s]ulentic jw . 1987 . _ ap . j. _ 322:605 - 17 [ s]ulentic jw . 1993 . in _ progress in new cosmologies : beyond the big bang hc arp et al , pp . new york : plenum press [ s]ulentic jw . j. _ in press [ s]ulentic jw , de mello rabaa df . 1993 . _ ap . j. _ 410:520 - 25 [ s]ulentic jw , lorre jj . _ 120:36 - 52 [ s]ulentic jw , pietsch w , arp h. 1995 . _ 298:420 - 26 [ s]ulentic jw , rabaa cr 429:531 - 39 [ t]hompson la , & gregory sa . 242:1 - 7 [ t]iersch h. 1976 . _ 297:301 - 3 [ t]ikhonov na . _ soobsc . spets . _ 49:69 - 84 [ t]ikhonov na _ astrofizika _ 27:253 - 64 [ t]ovmasian gm , shakhbazian ets , shirbakian ms . 1980 . _ astrofizika _ 15:513 - 14 [ t]oomre a. 1977 . in _ the evolution of galaxies and stellar populations , _ ed . bm tinsley , rb larson , pp . new haven : yale univ . [ t]suboi m , nakai n. 1994 . jpn . _ 46:l179-l182 [ t]ully rb . _ nearby galaxies catalog _ , cambridge : cambridge univ . press [ v]ennik j , richter gm , longo g. 1993 . 314:393- [ v]enugopal vr . _ mnras _ 277:455 - 57 [ v]ettolani g , gregorini l. 1988 . _ astron . _ 189:39 - 41 [ v]orontsov - velyaminov ba _ atlas and catalog of interacting galaxies , _ vol 1 . moscow : sternberg inst . [ v]orontsov - velyaminov ba . _ atlas of interacting galaxies , part ii _ , _ astron . suppl . _ 28:1 [ v]orontsov - velyaminov ba , dostal va , metlov vg . _ soviet astron . _ 6:394 - 97 [ v]orontsov - velyaminov ba , metlov vg . 1980 . _ soviet astr . _ 6 , 199 - 201 [ w]alke dg , mamon ga . 1989 . _ _ 225:291 - 302 [ w]eil ml , hernquist l. 1994 . _ ap . j. lett . _ 431:l79-l82 [ w]hite sdm . 1990 . in _ dynamics and interactions of galaxies , _ ed . r weilen , pp . 380 - 88 , heidelberg : springer - verlag [ w]hite sdm . 1992 . in _ clusters and superclusters of galaxies _ , nato advanced study institute , pp . 1 - 15 . [ w]hitmore bc . 1992 . in _ physics of nearby galaxies : _ nature _ or nurture ? , _ tx thuan , c balkowski , j tran thanh van , _ 12th moriond astrophys . meet . giv - sur - yvette : ed . front . [ w]hitmore bc , gilmore dm 367:64 - 68 [ w]hitmore bc , schweizer f , leitherer c , borne k , robert c. 1993 . _ astron . j. _ 106:1354 - 70 [ w]illiams ba , mcmahon pm , van gorkom jh . 101:1957 - 68 [ w]illiams ba , rood hj . _ 63:265 - 94 [ w]illiams ba , van gorkom jh 95:352 - 55 [ w]u w , rabaa cr , sulentic jw 1994 . soc . _ 26:1494 [ z]epf se . 407:448 - 55 [ z]epf se , whitmore bc . 1991 . _ ap . j. _ 383:542 - 49 [ z]epf se , whitmore bc . 1993 . _ ap . j. _ 418:72 - 81 [ z]epf se , whitmore bc , levison hf . 1991 . _ 383:524 - 41 [ z]heng j , valtonen mj , chernin ad . 1993 . 105:2047 - 53 [ z]ou z - l , xia x - y , deng z - g , wu h. 1995 . _ astron . astrophys . _ 304:369 - 73 Abstract:

Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.

Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered . Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video . Paper: long before the development of general relativity , john michell wondered about the gravitational influence of objects on the light they emit , and how one might go about finding objects so dense that light could not escape their surfaces . `` [ i]f any other luminous bodies should happen to revolve about them we might still perhaps from the motions of these revolving bodies infer the existence of the central ones with some degree of probability , as this might afford a clue to some of the apparent irregularities of the revolving bodies , which would not be easily explicable on any other hypothesis '' @xcite . more than 200 years later , precisely this method has been employed to determine the mass of the black hole ( bh ) at the center of our milky way . sgr a@xmath10 is one of the most tightly constrained bhs in the universe , with a total mass uncertainty ( statistical and systematic ) of less than 10% ( see * ? ? ? * and references therein ) . using stellar motions to measure the bh masses in more distant galaxies is complicated by our current inability to spatially resolve the orbits of individual stars . instead , one must rely on the luminosity - weighted line - of - sight velocity distribution ( losvd ) within different spatial resolution elements , and model the most likely contribution to the gravitational potential from the unseen bh ( beyond that provided by the stars themselves and any dark matter ) . the most common numerical approach to constraining the bh mass ( @xmath0 ) and mass - to - light ratio of the stars ( @xmath11 ) is the orbit superposition method of @xcite , which simultaneously optimizes the fit to the surface brightness distribution and the line - of - sight kinematics of stars within the nuclear region . application of that technique has yielded more than 50 bh mass estimates ( e.g. , * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? a complimentary mass scale has been developed for the bhs in active galactic nuclei ( agns ) , based on the technique of reverberation mapping ( rm ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? measuring the size - scale and velocity of gas near the bh has provided mass estimates for @xmath1250 bhs @xcite , but systematic uncertainties remain due to the unknown geometry and dynamics of the gas . this uncertainty is traditionally encapsulated in a scaling ( or projection ) factor , @xmath13 an empirical calibration for the rm mass scale @xmath14 has been established by assuming that those agns also lie on the tight correlation between bh mass and bulge stellar velocity dispersion ( the @xmath15 relation ) found in quiescent galaxies . this was first done by @xcite , who obtained an average rm mass scale of @xmath16 . subsequent determinations have ranged from @xmath17 @xcite to @xmath18 @xcite , with the most recent value being @xmath19 @xcite . for ngc 4151 , this gives a current rm - derived bh mass of @xmath20 ( based on the revised estimate of * ? ? ? it is important to note that the error generally quoted on a rm - derived bh mass in an individual galaxy is the formal uncertainty in the virial product and does not include the uncertainty in the nominal mean scale factor @xmath21 . what has been missing is an independent bh mass measurement for a sample of galaxies with rm estimates . early results have suggested that the empirically calibrated rm masses are consistent with the values produced by other techniques @xcite , but the few agns near enough to be probed by stellar dynamics have not yielded particularly tight constraints ( in part , owing to the complicating factor of the bright agn overwhelming the stellar absorption features at the smallest galactic radii ) . while only a few galaxies lend themselves to multiple methods for measuring the masses of their central bhs , such independent bh mass determinations are crucial to isolating the systematic errors inherent in each method . it is only via independent measurements that it is possible to derive robust bh masses . ngc 4151 is a particularly interesting galaxy since it is one of the rare objects for which there already exist two independent dynamical measurements for the mass of the bh . @xcite use optical spectroscopy of stellar absorption lines and orbit superposition modeling to derive an upper limit for the bh mass of @xmath22 when the galactic bulge is assumed to be edge - on . when the bulge is assumed to have the same inclination as the large - scale disk , they derive a bh mass of 4 - 5@xmath23 , which they caution is likely to be a biased solution since it is associated with a very noisy @xmath1 surface that also gives a poor fit to the data ( in terms of absolute @xmath1 value ) . @xcite use adaptive optics ( ao ) to obtain high spatial resolution , near - infrared spectroscopy of the molecular , ionized , and highly ionized gas in ngc 4151 . from the kinematics of gas in the vicinity of the bh , they derive a dynamical mass of @xmath24 for the bh . being somewhat smaller than the value obtained by @xcite , this suggests a need to revisit the stellar dynamical bh mass measurement . two serious concerns with the result of @xcite motivate the need for the high spatial resolution observations that are presented in this paper . first , based on the rm mass and the bh mass derived by @xcite , the sphere of influence of the bh is estimated to be @xmath25 , significantly smaller than the spatial resolution of the spectra used by @xcite . second , low spatial resolution integral field spectroscopy of a larger field of view @xcite shows that the true kinematic major axis of the bulge ( derived from the 2d velocity field ) is oriented @xmath26 from the axis assumed by @xcite . the observations and modeling presented in this paper are designed to overcome both of these drawbacks and to provide a more robust comparison with the gas dynamical measurement of @xcite . to enhance the comparison between the rm and stellar dynamical mass scales for bhs , we have obtained near - ir integral field spectroscopy with ao in order to study the stellar dynamics in the inner regions of the reverberation - mapped agn , ngc 4151 . in conjunction with our previous optical spectroscopy and multi - wavelength imaging data , we are able to place the tightest dynamical constraints to date on the bh mass in ngc 4151 . in section 2 , we describe the observational data . in section 3 , we discuss our stellar dynamical modeling . section 4 describes our results . section 5 contains further discussion and our conclusions . ngc 4151 is a nearby ( @xmath27 ) galaxy with a prominent bulge , faint spiral arms and a large scale bar ( see sections 3.4 and 3.5 for more details on the morphology and distance of the galaxy ) . the galaxy s nuclear activity has been studied extensively since the original paper by seyfert ( 1943 ) ; in particular , the analysis of uv and optical emission lines have been used for determining the bh mass via rm ( e.g. , * ? ? ? the analysis presented here uses new near - ir spectroscopy performed with ao , as well as previously published optical long - slit spectroscopy , and space- and ground - based imaging ( primarily from * ? ? ? * hereafter paper i ) to provide a mass estimate independent of the rm value . observations of ngc 4151 and three giant stars ( used as velocity templates ) were obtained with the near - infrared integral field spectrograph ( nifs ; * ? ? ? * ) on gemini north between 16 feb 2008 and 24 feb 2008 in queue mode ( program i d gn-2008a - q-41 ) . the nifs image - slicing integral field unit ( ifu ) provides @xmath28 near - ir spectra across a @xmath29 field , with a spatial sampling of @xmath30 , or @xmath31 `` spaxels '' ( spatial pixels ) , where the smaller pixel scale is along each of the 29 image slices . because previous observations of the k - band stellar absorption lines in ngc 4151 show the features to be weak in the central regions @xcite , we focus on the co ( 6 - 3 ) bandhead at a rest - frame wavelength of 1.62 @xmath32 m , which has been found to be quite prominent in previous nifs spectra @xcite . the @xmath2-band spectra cover a wavelength range of @xmath33m@xmath34 m ( centered at 1.6490 @xmath32 m ) , with a dispersion of 1.60 pixel@xmath35 across the 2040 spectral pixels , and a velocity resolution of 56.8 . to take advantage of the spatial sampling afforded by nifs , the observations were taken with the altair ao system @xcite , using the agn in ngc 4151 as the ao guide star . the observations employed the altair field lens @xcite to provide a more uniform point spread function ( psf ) across the nifs field . the level of ao correction depends upon the prevailing seeing conditions at the time . the median uncorrected seeing was @xmath36 , and more than 95% of the data were obtained in seeing better than @xmath37 , which provided an ao - corrected nuclear fwhm between @xmath38 and @xmath39 . to estimate the psf , we model the contribution from the agn to the spectrum in each spaxel across the field of view , taking advantage of the agn s strong [ ] @xmath40 m emission line , at an observed wavelength of @xmath41 m . although the [ ] emission is spatially extended in ngc 4151 , the off - nuclear emission line is narrower than the nuclear line profile , and tight constraints can be placed on the amount of agn spectrum that ends up in each spaxel ( see 4.2 of * ? ? ? the analysis was restricted to a wavelength region around the [ ] line ( @xmath42m@xmath43 m ) , and to control the effects of noise , the spectra were box - car smoothed over 5 pixels . a slice was taken through the center of the resulting 2d map , cutting along the smaller pixel scale ( @xmath44 ) . the psf profile shows the standard core+halo structure delivered by ao systems , which we model as a 2-part gaussian , where the core has @xmath45 , the halo has @xmath46 , and each component has equal amplitude . the data for ngc 4151 were acquired at a position angle of @xmath47 , which aligns the nifs slitlets perpendicular to the radio jet ( matching the orientation used by * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? the typical observing sequence included a 9-point dither pattern with separations of 0206 , and offsets to a sky field ( 210 away ) approximately every third frame . individual exposures were 120 s long , and the observations were split into sequences of 80 minutes in duration ( in some instances , shortened by changing weather conditions ) . arc lamps were taken in the middle of each observing sequence , and telluric standards were obtained before and after each sequence . the telluric stars were chosen to be 2mass sources to simultaneously provide photometric calibration : hd 98152 was observed before ngc 4151 , and hd 116405 afterwards . darks , flats , and ronchi mask calibrations were obtained during the daytime after each night s science observations . in total , 253 on - source frames were obtained , for a total exposure time of 30360 s. a total of 112 sky frames were also acquired . the giant stars we observed were included so as to provide a measure of the spectral broadening of the instrument , allowing the intrinsically narrow - featured stars to serve as templates that could be broadened to match the actual stellar velocity distribution of ngc 4151 . these velocity template stars were observed without ao , and were selected to span a range of spectral type : hd 35833 ( g0 ) , hd 40280 ( ) , hip 60145 ( m0 ) . the observations of each star consist of four on - source and two sky exposures , each with an integration time of 5.3 s. the nifs data were reduced with a combination of version 1.9.1 of the gemini iraf package and our own iraf scripts . calibrations were processed independently for each night . the observations of ngc 4151 were grouped by proximity to a telluric standard , typically dividing the observing sequence in half . the data were flat - fielded , dark - subtracted , wavelength - calibrated , and spatially rectified , then combined , corrected for telluric features , and flux - calibrated . the flux calibration provided by the two telluric / flux standards differs systematically by @xmath48% , implying a 0.3 mag discrepancy in the 2mass photometry for the two stars . because the absolute flux levels in the nifs data play no role in our subsequent analysis , we do not attempt to correct for this offset . since the image quality of some frames is significantly worse than others , we select a subsample of individual frames with fwhm values below a certain upper limit . with a threshold of 016 in the fwhm ( measured at a uniform wavelength of 1.6598 @xmath32 m to avoid emission features in the spectra ) , 236 frames are included in the final datacube . we spatially shift the data to account for the dither pattern and then median - combine the images , yielding a datacube containing 29@xmath4969 spatial pixels and 2040 spectral pixels . the near - ir spectra at each spatial position in the final nifs datacube are combined onto a bin of size @xmath1202-square ( 2@xmath495 raw spaxels ) , resulting in a cube of 15@xmath4915 spaxels . this choice of binning the spaxels arose from two main considerations . first , prior to carrying out the axisymmetric dynamical modeling , the kinematic data need to be symmetrized about the kinematic major axis and reflected about the rotation axis , to avoid modeling inconsistencies . this process is best accomplished with square bins , especially when the symmetry axes of the galaxy are not aligned with the axes of the spectrograph ( as is generally the case ) . second , since the halo of the psf has @xmath46 and this component comprises 50% of the overall psf amplitude , the spatial resolution of the data is not significantly altered by using larger bins . we reduce the observations of the telluric / flux standard stars and the velocity template stars with procedures similar to those we apply to the ngc 4151 data . we median - combine the four frames for each star , extract spectra with a fixed aperture of 1@xmath505 , and then we normalize each extracted spectrum for the velocity template stars by a low - order fit to the continuum . in addition to the new data from nifs , we utilize the results from the optical spectra of ngc 4151 that were analyzed in paper i. the data consist of long - slit spectra of the calcium triplet region ( @xmath51 ) taken with the mayall 4 m telescope at kitt peak national observatory in 2001 , and with the 6.5 m mmt observatory at mt . hopkins in 2004 . for the data from kitt peak , the spectroscopic slit was 2wide and was placed at a position angle of 135@xmath52 . to enhance the signal - to - noise , spectra were extracted with an aperture that increased in size away from the galaxy center , extending to radii of @xmath5314 . the spectral resolution was @xmath54 . for the observations with the mmt , the slit was 1 wide , at a position angle of 69@xmath52 . spectra were extracted in @xmath55 bins to a distance of 12on either side of the agn . the spectral resolution was @xmath56 . the seeing conditions for the two datasets were @xmath121.8 and @xmath123 , respectively . we refer the reader to paper i for full details . to model the surface brightness profile of ngc 4151 in the near - ir , we make use of the @xmath2-band imaging from the early data release of the ohio state university bright spiral galaxy survey ( osubsgs ; * ? ? ? the data were obtained with the 1.8 m perkins telescope at lowell observatory . the image has a plate scale of 15 pixel@xmath35 , and we estimate the seeing to be 2 . we photometrically calibrate the osubsgs imaging using 2mass point - sources in the field , deriving a photometric zero - point of @xmath57 mag . to bridge the gap in the surface brightness information between the small field - of - view of the ao - assisted nifs data and the large - scale low resolution imaging data of the osubsgs , we use the _ hubble space telescope _ images from paper i. these data were taken with the f550 m filter on the high resolution channel of the advanced camera for surveys ( acs ) , and cover a field - of - view of @xmath1225@xmath4929 . we refer the reader to paper i for additional details . we also make use of @xmath58- and @xmath59-band optical imaging from the sloan digital sky survey ( sdss ) to assist in constraining the mass - to - light ratio ( @xmath11 ) . the images have an exposure time of 53.9 s in each band , with 0396 pixels and @xmath1210-seeing in both filters . we use the photometrically calibrated and sky - subtracted images that sdss makes available . as in paper i , our modeling relies on simultaneously fitting both the luminosity distribution of the bulge and the observed integrated line - of - sight velocity distributions ( losvd ) of stars obtained with various spectrographs over a range of spatial scales . we detail below the methods of deriving those quantities from the data described above . as discussed in [ sec : nifs_details ] , the nifs instrument produces a grid of spatial pixels ( `` spaxels '' ) of size @xmath30 which were combined onto a bin of size 02-square , resulting in a cube of 15@xmath4915 spaxels . the spectrum from each binned spaxel is then analyzed using the `` penalized pixel fitting '' ( ppxf ) package for idl by @xcite . the ppxf routine computes the velocity shift , the velocity dispersion , and the higher - order moments of the stellar losvds ( parameterized as gauss - hermite ( gh ) polynomials ) that , when convolved with the velocity template star spectrum , provide the best match to the observed data . the software allows emission features to be masked in the fit , and also provides for multiplicative and additive polynomials to be included ( which we use to account for the contribution of the agn continuum ) . our ppxf analysis fits the losvd up to 4th - order gh terms , including 2nd - order multiplicative and additive polynomials , and fits the spectra over the wavelength range @xmath60m@xmath61 m , with four small wavelength gaps around agn emission lines and residual sky features . figure [ fig.spec ] shows four example spectra and ppxf fits , from different positions within the datacube . we obtain the smallest uncertainties on the kinematic parameters when we fit the agn spectra with the m0 velocity template , and allowing simultaneous use of all three templates does not measurably improve the results . we also compared the velocity measurements to those obtained when using nifs velocity templates ( spectral types , , , and a ) acquired by watson et al . ( 2008 ; gemini program gn-2006b - sv-110 ) . the m - type stars provided better matches to the relative strengths of the absorption lines in each ngc 4151 spectrum , and the kinematic uncertainties were smaller than for the k - type stars . compared to the kinematics derived from our m0 velocity template , the differences were typically less than 1@xmath4 , suggesting our fits are robust against the effects of template - mismatch . our results are consistent with those of @xcite , who found better matches to @xmath2-band galaxy spectra with m - type stars than with k - type stars . figure [ fig : vel_fields_orig ] ( top row ) shows maps of the line - of - sight velocity ( @xmath62 ) , velocity dispersion ( @xmath63 ) , and the 3rd and 4th gh moments ( @xmath64 ) in 02 spaxels . the @xmath65 coordinates are aligned with the major and minor kinematic axes , respectively . the color scale is in km / s for @xmath62 and @xmath63 , and in dimensionless units for @xmath66 and @xmath67 . we then bi - symmetrize the 2d losvd map ( fig . [ fig : vel_fields_orig ] bottom row ) around the kinematic minor axis at a position angle of @xmath68 ( @xmath69 relative to the nifs y - axis ) , using an idl routine developed by @xcite . this procedure enhances the s / n by combining the measurements on either side of the kinematic minor axis in a symmetric ( @xmath63 and @xmath67 ) , or anti - symmetric ( @xmath62 and @xmath66 ) way . data point is multiplied by -1 and averaged with the @xmath66 value at a position mirrored on the opposite side of the bh . ] such a procedure is necessary in order to obtain sensible results from an axisymmetric dynamical modeling code , which assumes such an underlying symmetry . the kinematic data were bi - symmetrized in a weighted mean , using the individual uncertainties reported by ppxf to derive the weights . the final kinematic uncertainties are computed as the errors in the weighted mean values . figure [ fig : nifs_sau ] shows the line - of - sight stellar velocity fields from nifs ( left ) and sauron ( right ) . the latter data are from @xcite and show a similar large scale rotational velocity to that seen in the inner 3@xmath493 region observed with nifs . although the large scale line - of - sight velocity fields in both panels show the same global rotational velocity , the central region of the sauron velocity field within 5@xmath49 5 ( right ) is dominated by agn continuum . therefore , the innermost parts allow no velocity measurement , and appear as a black oval region in the image . thus , the sauron data do not provide constraints on the bh mass , although they could provide constraints on the mass - to - light ratio ( @xmath11 ) . however , we do not include the sauron data in our modeling , relying instead on the long - slit kinematics obtained from mmt and kpno to provide the constraints on @xmath11 at large radii . this is partly a pragmatic choice since the use of ifu data on both small and large scales would significantly increase the total number of kinematic constraints that would need to be fitted and , therefore , would require a significantly larger orbit library than we use here , making the problem significantly more computationally expensive than we are able to handle . we calculate the @xmath2-band surface brightness profile using our nested series of images to probe different spatial scales . for large radii ( @xmath70 ) , we use the photometrically calibrated osubsgs images . at intermediate radii ( @xmath71 ) , we use the acs optical image , allowing a significant region of overlap with the osubsgs data . the acs flux level is then rescaled to provide the best match to the @xmath2-band data in the overlap region . our use of the optical data could potentially bias the surface brightness profile we derive if there are significant variations in extinction or stellar population at radii of @xmath72 . however , there are no independent indications of stellar population changes in that part of ngc 4151 , and the radial profile of the acs image is relatively smooth at those distances . those radii are also well isolated from the psf of the agn in the acs image . in the central regions , we derive a stellar flux profile directly from the nifs datacube . one of the outputs of the ppxf modeling is the derived amplitude of the stellar template that best matches the galaxy data . as our template spectra are continuum - normalized , these amplitudes constitute relative measurements of the stellar flux in each spaxel , calculated in a way that naturally omits the agn contribution to the light profile . the unbinned data are used to probe radii of 0@xmath73 ( excluding the agn - dominated central spaxel ) . the overall nifs stellar profile is then scaled in amplitude to match the overlapping acs data from larger radii . we then fit the full @xmath2-band surface brightness profile using the multi - gaussian expansion ( mge ) package @xcite . the mge routine fits the smallest necessary number of nested 2d gaussians with a common center and radially varies their amplitudes and axis ratios to obtain the best possible smooth fit to the observed 2d surface brightness distribution , taking account of the psf . the deprojection of a 2d surface brightness distribution to derive the 3d luminosity distribution suffers from the well known degeneracy arising from `` konus densities '' that are invisible in projection @xcite . a number of different methods have been used to derive the 3d luminosity density , none of which guarantee a unique deprojection . the mge method has the advantage that , once an angle of inclination is assumed , each 2d gaussian has a unique 3d luminosity density whose potential is easily computed and which is positive everywhere @xcite . the code outputs the amplitude ( total counts ) , width in pixels ( @xmath74 ) , and observed axis ratio ( @xmath75 ) for each gaussian . we convert those values to a central surface brightness , @xmath76 , for each gaussian as : @xmath77 where @xmath78 is the @xmath2-band surface brightness of the sun at a distance where 1 pc@xmath79 subtends 1 arcsec@xmath79 . for an absolute @xmath2-band magnitude of [email protected] mag @xcite , this gives @xmath80 mag arcsec@xmath81 . the surface brightness is computed from the mge fits as : @xmath82 where @xmath83 is the osubsgs @xmath2-band image zero - point of 22.2 mag , @xmath84 is the total counts , @xmath85 is the plate scale of @xmath86 pixel@xmath35 , and the @xmath2-band extinction is @xmath87=0.016 mag ( * ? ? ? * retrieved from the nasa / ipac extragalactic database ) . for the mge modelling , a 1-component psf was used , having an effective width of @xmath88 . the output of our mge fit to the surface brightness distribution is given in table [ tab : mge_sb ] . for each gaussian in the mge fit , the first column gives an identifying number , the second column gives the @xmath2-band luminosity density , the third column gives the standard deviation @xmath4 ( in arcsec ) , and the fourth column gives the flattening @xmath75 ( ellipticity ) . it is clear from the values of @xmath75 in the third column that the bulge surface brightness distribution is close to circular since most of the gaussians have @xmath89 ( except for the innermost and outermost gaussians ) suggesting that the bulge is probably close to spherical . in figure [ fig : sb_profile ] , we show the composite radial surface brightness profile obtained by patching together the three imaging datasets . lcccgaussian & surface density , @xmath90 & gaussian @xmath4 & axis ratio @xmath75 + number & ( @xmath91/pc@xmath92 ) & ( ) & + ( 1 ) & ( 2 ) & ( 3 ) & ( 4 ) + + 1 & 9.3963e+04 & 0.126 & 0.7906 + 2 & 1.3200e+05 & 0.232 & 1.0000 + 3 & 7.8100e+04 & 0.549 & 1.0000 + 4 & 2.0951e+04 & 1.421 & 1.0000 + 5 & 6.7191e+03 & 2.799 & 1.0000 + 6 & 3.7009e+03 & 6.703 & 1.0000 + 7 & 6.8485e+02 & 14.513 & 0.9550 + 8 & 3.1906e+02 & 64.987 & 0.7052 + [ tab : mge_sb ] to provide a rough constraint on the relationship between the luminosity distribution and the stellar mass distribution , we combine optical imaging from sdss with the osubsgs @xmath2-band image . we construct ( @xmath93 ) and ( @xmath94 ) color maps of ngc 4151 , finding the bulge colors of ( @xmath93)[email protected] mag , and ( @xmath94)[email protected] mag to be quite uniform across the bulge ( aside from the central few arcseconds , where the agn dominates the emission ) . @xcite calculated @xmath2-band mass - to - light ratios ( @xmath95 ) in ( @xmath93)-(@xmath94 ) color - space , based on a monte carlo analysis of @xcite stellar population synthesis models . examining our measured colors in the @xcite color - space indicates that @xmath8 . our initial exploration with dynamical models spanning the entire range @xmath96 showed that the best fit values were always in the range @xmath97 , hence this range of values is used in the models below . ngc 4151 was classified by @xcite as ( r)sab(rs)ab : a disk galaxy with a pseudo - outer ring ( r ) , a `` mixed '' bar ( ab ) ( i.e. , possibly barred but is not strongly so ) , with mixed spiral / inner ring classification ( rs ) , and an intermediate to large bulge ( ab ) . figure [ fig : slit_orient ] ( left ) shows the palomar observatory sky survey ( poss ) image of ngc 4151 in the red optical filter . in part because of the very circular bulge , the classification of this galaxy as barred has been questioned by authors as far back as @xcite , who speculated that the elongation was not a bar , but was in fact made up of material that was ejected from the nucleus in a former explosive event . however , we believe that ngc 4151 may be an example of a galaxy containing a `` barlens '' , an oval - shaped structure that is likely to be the vertically thick aspect of a bar seen from a particular viewing angle @xcite . in paper i , we assumed that the kinematic major axis is aligned with the bar , since spectral information was only available along two long - slits . the kpno slit ( represented by the red line in fig . [ fig : slit_orient ] left ) was oriented along the bar at a position angle of 135@xmath52 @xcite . the mmt slit ( green line in fig . [ fig : slit_orient ] left ) was placed at a position angle of 69@xmath52 . the middle panel of figure [ fig : slit_orient ] shows the region within the white box from the left panel . the grey box in the middle panel represents the orientation and shape of the nifs field of view . it is quite clear from a comparison of the nifs velocity field and the sauron velocity field in fig . [ fig : nifs_sau ] , that the rotation axis of the disk and bulge are not perpendicular to the bar as was assumed in paper i. this is an important difference between the models presented here and the models presented in paper i. to first order , the bh mass derived by the stellar dynamical modeling depends linearly on the assumed distance to the galaxy where r is the linear radius within which the velocity ( or velocity dispersion ) is measured , and the conversion between angular and linear radii is inversely proportional to distance in the nearby universe . ] . for consistency with the analysis in paper i , we adopt a distance for ngc 4151 of 13.9 mpc ( based on the recession velocity of 998 measured by * ? ? ? however , as noted in paper i , the actual distance to the galaxy is rather uncertain , with published estimates spanning a range of 10 mpc to 30 mpc . recently , @xcite compiled a group - averaged tully - fisher distance of [email protected] mpc in the extragalactic distance database . however , that group distance is based on just four galaxies , which have a standard deviation in their distance moduli of more than four times the individual distance modulus errors . furthermore , it is unclear whether the contribution to the group average distance from ngc 4151 ( of @xmath124 mpc ) accounts for the agn contribution to the galaxy brightness . thus , we can not regard the @xcite value as being any more reliable than other distances , and until a more accurate distance can be obtained , we continue to use the value of 13.9 mpc . we apply what is now the standard stellar dynamical modeling approach of orbit superposition ( e.g * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ) to fit the observed losvds and luminosity distribution of ngc 4151 . the orbit superposition ( or `` schwarzschild '' ) method of dynamical modeling uses line - of - sight kinematical and imaging data to constrain the mass distributions of external galaxies . the implementation of the code used here differs from the method detailed in ( * ? ? ? * hereafter vme04 ) in two small aspects . it is ( a ) designed to fit generalized axisymmetric models that are obtained from direct deprojection of the surface brightness profiles of the individual galaxies using a mge code , following the method outlined in @xcite ; ( b ) modified to fit integral field kinematics in addition to long - slit kinematics . we restrict our models to the surface brightness distribution within 50 i.e. , the bulge region using the mge decomposition from table [ tab : mge_sb ] . for each dynamical model , we assume a constant @xmath2-band mass - to - light ratio ( @xmath95 ) for the stars value for the stars and the best - fit model values of @xmath95 described below are completely consistent with the expectations derived from the stellar photometry in sec . [ sec : mtol ] . even if we were to include such a halo , its contribution to the inner 15 region , where the nifs kinematics exist , would likely be small . as we will show , the nifs data entirely determine our final bh mass , justifying our decision to not include a dark matter halo . ] , with values varying from @xmath98 . the resulting density profile is then converted to a gravitational potential using an axisymmetric multipole expansion scheme @xcite . the gravitational potential of a point mass ( @xmath0 ) , representing the central bh , is then added . models are constructed for every pair of parameters ( @xmath0 , @xmath95 ) , building an orbit library for each combination . the large - scale disk of ngc 4151 is inclined to the line of sight at @xmath99 @xcite . however , since the bulge appears very close to circular in projection ( see fig . [ fig : slit_orient ] and tab . [ tab : mge_sb ] ) , it is probably nearly spherical or being viewed close to face on . thus , we run models on a 2d grid of ( @xmath100 ) values for three different inclination angles @xmath101 ( edge - on ) , @xmath102 and @xmath103 ( close to face - on ) . we also run a limited set of models for which the value of @xmath0 is held fixed while the inclination angle of the model is varied with values @xmath104 , and @xmath105 , in an effort to set constraints on the inclination of the bulge to the line - of - sight . for inclination angles of @xmath101 and @xmath106 , we run orbit libraries for 18 bh masses between @xmath107 , using a baseline @xmath108 . these models are then scaled to create libraries for 18 different @xmath95 values , producing a total of 324 models for each inclination angle . we also run orbit libraries for @xmath102 , using 10 bh masses across the same mass range and 18 @xmath95 values for each @xmath0 ( 180 models ) . the range of bh mass values was set by initial experimentation with a coarse grid on a wide range of values . the lowest two values of @xmath0 are set to 10@xmath109 and 10@xmath110 , both of which consistently give poor fits to the data . the upper limit of @xmath0 was raised until it was clear that models once again gave very poor fits to the data . the combined gravitational potential of the bulge and the bh is used to integrate a large library of @xmath111 stellar orbits selected on a grid with @xmath112 energy values , @xmath113 angular momentum values ( @xmath114 ) at each energy , and @xmath115 pseudo third integral values ( @xmath116 ) at each angular momentum value ( see vme04 for details ) . for instance , models with @xmath117 used @xmath118 , @xmath119 , @xmath120 . each orbit is integrated for 100 orbital periods and its average `` observed '' contribution to each of the `` apertures '' in which kinematical data are available is stored . the orbital kinematics are subjected to the same type of instrumental effects as the real data ( i.e. psf convolution , pixel binning ) . self - consistent orbit - superposition models are constructed by linearly co - adding orbits in each library to simultaneously fit several elements within the observed apertures ( imaging and spectroscopic ) : the 3d mass distribution ( for each value of @xmath95 ) , the projected surface density distribution , and the losvds . the fits use a non - negative least squares optimization algorithm ( nnls ; * ? ? ? * ) , which gives the weighted superposition of the orbits that best reproduce both the self - consistency constraints ( i.e. , the 3d mass distribution and surface brightness distribution ) and the observed kinematical constraints ( @xmath121 ) . vme04 showed that as the ratio of orbits to constraints decreases , the error bars decrease artificially . in the majority of the models presented here we have 1240 constraints that are fitted by a library of 9936 orbits . this size of orbit library gives an orbits - to - constraints ratio of 8 which is only slightly above the ratio ( 5 ) at which vme04 find that solutions begin to be biased . in section [ sec : robust_size ] we carry out a limited exploration with a 50% larger orbit library and find that our results are unchanged . smoothing ( or `` regularization '' ) of the orbital solutions is typically performed in this type of analysis , and a variety of methods have been employed to that end . regularization mainly helps to reduce the sensitivity of the solutions to noise in the data by requiring a smoother sampling of the orbit libraries used in the solution . following @xcite , we run a trial series of models with a regularization scheme that requires local smoothing in phase space . we find that for small smoothing parameters ( @xmath122 ) the resultant best - fit @xmath0 values do not differ from the models without regularization . however , the @xmath1 value for the best - fit model is larger and the error bars on @xmath0 are smaller . vme04 showed that it is impossible ( without computationally expensive approaches such as generalized cross - validation ) to determine the ideal regularization parameter . not regularizing the solutions can yield large error bars , but choosing too large a value of the smoothing parameter can introduce a bias in the best - fit value of @xmath0 . in this paper , we present models without regularization , since imposing regularization constraints significantly increases the total number of constraints and therefore decreases even further the orbits - to - constraints ratio . for the libraries used here , models without regularization provide the most conservative error bars on the estimated value of @xmath0 . since the mass and surface mass density constraints are _ self - consistency constraints _ rather than observational constraints , they do not have observational errors associated with them . there are two ways in which the absence of observational errors are handled in the literature . @xcite and vme04 include self - consistency constraints in the nnls minimization problem with errors corresponding to predefined level of relative accuracy in the fit ( e.g. 5% -10% ) , while others @xcite solve the orbit superposition problem by requiring the self - consistency constraints ( mass and surface brightness ) to be fitted as separate as linear ( in)equality constraints with predetermined absolute accuracy . @xcite state that they require the self - consistency constraints to be fitted to an accuracy of 0.02 . we also attempted to fit self - consistency constraints as linear equalities but find that that since the values of the mass constraints vary by 5 orders of magnitude ( from @xmath123 to 10 ) , using a fixed numerical accuracy fails to fit the mass constraints at small radii ( where the logarithmic radial bins have the smallest mass values per bin and where the fit to mass constraints most strongly affects the estimated @xmath0 ) . for the models presented here we include the self - consistency constraints in the optimization problem and require the optimization problem to fit each of the 472 self - consistency constraints ( 280 mass constraints and 192 aperture surface brightness constraints ) with an error corresponding to a relative accuracy - per - constraint of 5% . for our preferred model with @xmath101 , the fractional accuracy per self - consistency constraint varies from 0.27% ( for the best fit model ) to 2.2% for the worst fit model , i.e. , always better than our required accuracy . figure [ fig : mass_err ] shows contours of constant fractional error in the fit to the self - consistency constraints ( mass and surface brightness in apertures ) over the 2d parameter space ( @xmath0 , @xmath95 ) for models with @xmath101 . the star is the location of the model with 0.27% accuracy per self - consistency constraint , and the contours are spaced at intervals of 0.1% relative accuracy per constraint . in previous applications of our schwarzschild modeling code ( vme04 , * ? ? ? * paper i ) , the error in the fit to the self - consistency constraints was essentially random over the entire 2d parameter space ( @xmath124 ) . although the self - consistency constraints were always included in the @xmath1 , they contributed so little to the total @xmath1 that the best fit solution was always driven by the fit to the kinematical constraints . we will show that this is not true for our current ngc 4151 dataset . despite the fact that the fits to the 3d mass distribution and surface brightness distribution are very good , because the fit vary systematically rather than randomly across the parameter space , the best fit solution is altered by the decision of whether or not to include the fit to the self - consistency constraints in the @xmath1 . based on the arguments above , we compute the @xmath1 in two different ways : ( 1 ) the total @xmath125 includes all the constraints in the nnls optimization problem : 280 mass constraints , 192 surface brightness constraints , and 768 kinematical constraints ( giving a total of @xmath126 constraints ) ; ( 2 ) @xmath127 which only considers the quality of the fit to @xmath128 kinematical constraints ( @xmath129 and @xmath67 in 192 apertures : 136 nifs spaxels , 15 kpno apertures , and 41 mmt apertures ) . for each of the three assumed angles of inclination for the bulge , we construct models by fitting these constraints using an orbit library consisting of @xmath117 orbits . for one inclination angle ( @xmath101 ) we do a limited exploration with a library consisting of @xmath130 orbits . after generating orbit libraries for a grid of parameters ( @xmath131 ) the best fit parameters are determined by the minimum in the 2d @xmath1-contour plot . in this section , we present the results of our modeling . in section [ sec : define_chi2 ] we describe results for inclination angles @xmath101 , @xmath102 and @xmath103 , showing 2d contour plots of @xmath125 and @xmath127 using a full 2d grid of models for each of these inclination angles . in section [ sec : inclination ] we examine the dependence on inclination angle for 4 additional models using a single @xmath0 . in section [ sec : robust ] we explore the robustness of our solutions by examining their sensitivity to the size of the orbit library and to the effect of restricting the set of kinematic constraints to those from the nuclear region only . we also present some of the best - fit solutions and show how well different pairs of @xmath100 fit both the 1d and 2d kinematical data . in section 5.4 , we discuss our results in the context of the relation . figure [ fig:2dchi2 ] shows 2d contour plots of @xmath125 in the plane of model parameters @xmath0 and @xmath95 for @xmath101 ( top ) , @xmath102 ( middle ) , and @xmath103 ( bottom ) . the grid of points shows the model parameters ( @xmath100 ) for which the orbit libraries is constructed and the optimization problem is solved . the first 6 contour levels in all the @xmath1 contour plots that follow correspond to @xmath132 , 68.3% confidence ) , @xmath133 , 90% confidence ) , @xmath134 , 95.4% confidence ) , @xmath135 , 99% confidence ) , @xmath136 , 99.73% ) , and @xmath137 , 99.99% ) , with subsequent contours equally spaced in @xmath138 . for @xmath101 , the minimum value of @xmath125 is obtained for @xmath139 and @xmath140 , with @xmath141 . for inclination angle of @xmath102 , the best fit model has @xmath142 and @xmath143 , with @xmath144 . for inclination angle of @xmath103 , the best fit model has @xmath145 and @xmath140 , with @xmath146 . table [ tab : bestfit ] summarizes the results and includes minimum @xmath1 values and the 1@xmath4 and 3@xmath4 error bars . the errors on a given parameter are obtained by marginalizing the 2d @xmath147 values over the other parameter . figure [ fig:1dchi2 ] ( top ) shows the marginalized 1d @xmath138 versus @xmath0 for the three different inclination angles , as indicated by the legends . the horizontal dotted lines are at @xmath148 ( 1@xmath4 , 68.5% confidence interval for 1 degree - of - freedom ) , @xmath149 ( 2@xmath4 , 90% confidence interval ) , and @xmath150 ( 3@xmath4 , 99% confidence interval ) . the 1@xmath4 and 3@xmath4 errors on @xmath0 and @xmath95 are given in table [ tab : bestfit ] . likewise , figure [ fig:1dchi2 ] ( bottom ) shows the marginalized 1d @xmath138 versus @xmath95 for each of the three inclinations of models to the line - of - sight . it is important to note that with the standard methods used to derive the velocity profiles ( vps ) from the spectra , the errors in the gauss - hermite ( gh ) coefficients are not independent . the errors associated with the even moments ( @xmath4 and @xmath67 ) are correlated , and errors associated with the odd moments ( @xmath151 and @xmath66 ) are also correlated ( see , e.g. , * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? @xcite point out that an important consequence of correlated errors in the gh coefficients is that the errors obtained by comparing data to dynamical models using the @xmath1 estimator are significantly underestimated . in this paper we quote both 1-@xmath4 and 3-@xmath4 errors , and often consider the 3-@xmath4 errors as better representations of the true modeling errors . lcccccccc & & & & + & & & & & & & & + ( 1 ) & ( 2 ) & ( 3 ) & ( 4 ) & ( 5 ) & ( 6 ) & ( 7 ) & ( 8) & ( 9 ) + + + 90@xmath52 & 9936 & 709.1 & 4.68 & @xmath152 & @xmath153 & 0.304 & @xmath154 & @xmath155 + & & & & & & & + 60@xmath52 & 9936 & 767.5 & 5.42 & @xmath156 & @xmath157 & 0.305&@xmath158 & @xmath159 + & & & & & & & + 23@xmath52 & 9936 & 1050.8 & 3.69 & @xmath160 & @xmath161 & 0.304 & @xmath158 & @xmath155 + & & & & & & & + + + 90@xmath52 & 9936 & 186.7 & 7.76 & @xmath162 & @xmath163 & 0.332 & @xmath164 & @xmath165 + & & & & & & & + 60@xmath52 & 9936 & 193.1 & 8.62 & @xmath166 & @xmath167 & 0.326&@xmath159 & @xmath168 + & & & & & & & + 23@xmath52 & 9936 & 348.2 & 8.50 & @xmath169 & @xmath170 & 0.329 & @xmath171 & @xmath172 + & & & & & & & + [ tab : bestfit ] the best fit solutions for both @xmath0 and @xmath95 for the three different inclination angles are consistent with each other within 3@xmath4 . however @xmath173 is the smallest for the edge - on model ( @xmath101 ) , increases for @xmath102 and is significantly larger for @xmath103 implying that it may be possible to constrain the inclination of the bulge ( see section [ sec : inclination ] ) . marginalizing @xmath125 over the three values of inclination gives a best fit @xmath174 and @xmath175 . figure [ fig:2dchi2_kin ] shows 2d contour plots of @xmath176 for the same sets of models as in figure [ fig:2dchi2 ] , with inclination angles @xmath177 ( from top to bottom ) . we emphasize that the model solutions that are used to generate figure [ fig:2dchi2_kin ] are identical to those used to generate figure [ fig:2dchi2 ] only the quantities used in computing the @xmath1 of the fit to the data differ . figure [ fig:1dchi2_kin ] shows the same data marginalized over @xmath95 ( top ) and marginalized over @xmath0 ( bottom ) . it is clear from these two figures that the best - fit solutions obtained using @xmath178 give both a larger @xmath179 and a larger @xmath180 . we will discuss the possible causes for this in section [ sec : robust ] and section [ sec : discuss ] . in contrast to the results of paper i , where @xmath101 models gave an upper limit of @xmath181 and @xmath103 models gave a best fit @xmath0 between @xmath182 , figures [ fig:1dchi2 ] and [ fig:1dchi2_kin ] show that best - fit @xmath0 is relatively insensitive to inclination ( although the actual best - fit value depends on how @xmath1 was computed ) . table [ tab : bestfit ] shows that the minimum values of @xmath183 and @xmath184 for @xmath101 are lower than the corresponding @xmath1 values for the other two inclination angles . we now try to constrain the inclination angle of the bulge of ngc 4151 by assuming a constant bh mass of @xmath185 . with this value of @xmath0 we compute orbit libraries for four additional inclination angles : @xmath186 , @xmath187 , @xmath188 , and @xmath105 . figure [ fig : chi_inc ] shows the values of @xmath183 for models with this value of @xmath0 and @xmath189 as a function of the inclination of the bulge to the line - of - sight . it is clear that @xmath183 decreases steadily with increasing inclination angle with a minimum at @xmath101 . ( a similar dependence on inclination angle is obtained for @xmath190 , although all the models give much worse fits as assessed by the @xmath125 values . ) the inclination angle of @xmath103 that is inferred from the velocity field is strongly disfavored . since the disk of this galaxy is clearly seen to be close to face - on , the edge - on orientation of the bulge preferred by our models is rather puzzling : the surface brightness isophotes of the bulge are nearly circular , hence the best - fit edge - on orientation implies that the bulge is nearly spherical in shape ; but in this case the rotation axis of the bulge must be misaligned with the rotation axis of the disk by @xmath191 . previous determinations of the orientations of the various components of ngc 4151 have shown a remarkable diversity . while the circular isophotes of the large - scale disk suggest the nearly face - on orientation with @xmath103 @xcite which motivated our testing of that value of inclination the components associated with the agn have been inferred to lie further from our line of sight . models of the bi - conical narrow - line region ( nlr ) in the uv and optical @xcite , and in the near - ir @xcite have typically found inclinations of @xmath192 . closer to the agn , @xcite fit the absorption using a pc - scale nuclear disk inclined at @xmath193 . on even smaller scales , an inclination of @xmath194 for the agn accretion disk was obtained from modeling the x - ray spectrum @xcite , while @xcite suggest that the radio jet in ngc 4151 lies very close to the plane of the sky and is interacting directly with circumnuclear gas in the plane of the galaxy ( i.e. , @xmath195 ) . this lack of alignment between the different spatial scales could be the consequence of a merger in the galaxy s recent past . it has been claimed that the periodic variability in the nuclear activity of ngc 4151 is indicative of a bh binary , with a separation on the order of @xmath196 au @xcite . while distinguishing between a single bh and a close binary is far beyond the capability of our dataset , the remnants of a merger could also contribute to the complicated dynamics we observe on the size scales of the bulge . in section [ sec : robust ] , we will show that the kinematics in the inner 5 show evidence for a bar in this region , implying that the internal dynamics of the bulge are likely not that of a spherical or axisymmetric system . a full understanding of why the kinematics of our model prefers an edge - on configuration to the more inclined configuration requires the system to be modeled by a bar dynamical modeling code , which does not exist at the present time . since the result of this section show that models with edge - on inclination ( @xmath101 ) are greatly preferred over more face - on models , in the rest of this paper we confine our analysis to models with @xmath101 . lllllcccccc & & & & & & + & & & & & & & & & & + ( 1 ) & ( 2 ) & ( 3 ) & ( 4 ) & ( 5 ) & ( 6 ) & ( 7 ) & ( 8) & ( 9 ) & ( 10 ) & ( 11 ) + + @xmath183 & 15092 & 1240 & 641.9 & 0.52 & 4.68 & @xmath197 & @xmath198 & 0.31 & @xmath158 & @xmath199 + & & & & & & & & & & + @xmath178&15092 & 768 & 170.2 & 0.22 & 7.32 & @xmath200 & @xmath201 & 0.31 & @xmath199 & @xmath202 + & & & & & & & & & & + + + @xmath183 & 9936 & 960 & 583.1 & 0.61 & 3.82 & @xmath203 & @xmath204 & 0.32 & @xmath199 & @xmath205 + & & & & & & & & & & + @xmath178 & 9936 & 680 & 101.7 & 0.14 & 3.70 & @xmath206 & @xmath207 & 0.35 & @xmath199 & @xmath202 + [ tab : robustbestfit ] vme04 showed that the solution derived from the schwarzschild method was sensitive to two important factors : ( a ) the size of the orbit libraries used in obtaining the best - fit bh mass ; and ( b ) the spatial resolution of the kinematic data and whether or not they resolved the sphere - of - influence of the bh . they showed that biased solutions could result when the size of the orbit libraries was too small for the available data . they also showed that when the kinematic data did not resolve the sphere - of - influence of the bh , spurious results could arise . in the next two sections we perform two tests to assess the robustness of our solutions . in particular , our goal is to assess which of the two values of @xmath0 obtained previously ( 5@xmath208 or 8@xmath209 ) is more robust . in this section , we construct a set of 288 models with @xmath101 but with orbit libraries containing @xmath210 orbits ( as compared to @xmath211 used thus far ) to fit the same set of 1240 constraints that were fitted in section [ sec : define_chi2 ] . large orbit libraries are constructed for 16 bh masses between 10@xmath109 and 15@xmath212 and for 18 values of @xmath213 . figure [ fig:1dchi_i9015k ] shows the 1d @xmath183 ( solid curves ) and @xmath178 ( dashed curves ) obtained by marginalizing over the mass - to - light ratio @xmath95 ( top panel ) and obtained by marginalizing over @xmath0 ( bottom panel ) . the resulting best - fit values for @xmath0 and @xmath95 , and their 1@xmath4 and @xmath214 errors , are shown in the top two rows of table [ tab : robustbestfit ] . the reduced @xmath1 values are given in column five . it is clear from a comparison with results in table [ tab : bestfit ] that the best - fit @xmath0 values are relatively insensitive to an increase in the size of the orbit library by @xmath1250% . the best - fit value of @xmath95 obtained by using @xmath178 ( dashed curves in the bottom panel of fig . [ fig:1dchi_i9015k ] ) is somewhat lower than the value of @xmath215 obtained with the smaller library , but is still within 2@xmath4 of this value . the test with the larger orbit libraries confirms the result we obtained with @xmath117 orbits per library , implying that our best - fit parameters are not biased by having too small an orbit library . furthermore , the discrepancy between the best - fit values obtained using @xmath147 and @xmath178 persists even with larger orbit libraries . figure [ fig : kinenifs_90 ] shows examples of model fits to the 2 dimensional nifs velocity fields ( from left to right , , and the gh moments @xmath66 and @xmath67 ) for the edge - on ( @xmath101 ) case with @xmath210 . note that while the best - fit solutions listed in tables [ tab : bestfit ] & [ tab : robustbestfit ] are determined by marginalizing over one parameter in the 2d contour surface ( which itself is smoothed with a kernel ) , the 2d grid of models is discrete . the derived best - fit value ( shown as stars on the 2d @xmath1 maps of figs . [ fig:2dchi2 ] and [ fig:2dchi2_kin ] ) does not overlap with any model on the grid , but lies between 4 grid points . we therefore show velocity fields and 1d kinematics for the model whose parameters are closest to the best - fit solution . in figure [ fig : kinenifs_90 ] , the top row shows velocity fields for @xmath216 ( the model closest to the best - fit obtained with for @xmath210 ) and the middle row shows velocity fields for @xmath217 , @xmath218 ( the model closest to the best - fit obtained with for @xmath210 ) . ( the bottom row of this figure is for a model with @xmath219 , @xmath218 , obtained when only nifs kinematical data are fitted , and will be discussed in section [ sec : robust_nuclear ] . ) the fitted velocity in figure [ fig : kinenifs_90 ] should be compared with the bi - symmetrized velocity fields in the bottom row of figure [ fig : vel_fields_orig ] . the four white pixels in each panel of the figure were not fitted because it was determined that their extremely high velocity dispersion values ( @xmath220 ) were spurious ( see fig . [ fig : vel_fields_orig ] ) since their values were larger than the central velocity dispersion despite being far from the center . in figure [ fig : kinenifs_90 ] the odd - moments of the losvd ( , @xmath66 ) are fairly well fitted by both the low @xmath0 model ( top row ) and the high @xmath0 model ( middle row ) . however , the nifs velocity dispersion for the model with @xmath221 , @xmath108 ( top row ) is much lower than in the data ( bottom of fig . [ fig : vel_fields_orig ] ) . the model with the larger value of @xmath217 does a slightly better job of reproducing the higher values within @xmath222 , but fails to fit the at the edges of the nifs field , where model values are significantly lower ( i.e. bluer pixel colors ) than the observed values seen in figure [ fig : vel_fields_orig ] ( bottom ) . this is because from nifs in the inner 15 region is overall larger than that obtained with kpno ( @xmath223 ) and mmt ( @xmath224 ) . inconsistent velocity dispersion values in the _ same physical region _ drives the solution to fit the data with the smallest error bars ( i.e. , mmt data ) thereby under - estimating from nifs . also note that neither model is able to fit both the low central and high outer @xmath67 values seen in the bi - symmetrized nifs velocity fields ( fig . [ fig : vel_fields_orig ] bottom row , right - most panel ) . the difference between the model fits and the data is more clearly seen in figure [ fig : kinematics_90_1d ] which shows the one - dimensional line - of - sight velocity ( ) , velocity dispersion ( ) and the gh moments of the losvd ( @xmath66 and @xmath67 ) that we obtain for the edge - on ( @xmath101 ) model . the red and blue curves show the best fits for same models as in the top and middle panels of figure [ fig : kinenifs_90 ] with values and @xmath95 indicated by the line legends in the top left panel of the first row ( these two models used libraries with @xmath210 orbits ) . the green curves in the top four nifs panels are obtained when only the nifs data are fitted ( with @xmath211 ) , this model is discussed in the next section . the open circles in the panels show the three different kinematic datasets used in the modeling , along with their 1@xmath4 uncertainties . ( the top four panels show kinematics in the nifs spaxels lying closest to the major axis of the model ; the middle four panels show data from the kpno long - slit ; the bottom four panels show data from the mmt long - slit . ) the most striking feature of the fits is that the red curve for @xmath225 ( red curve ) the model closest to the best - fit solution derived from the minimum in @xmath183 ( from figure . [ fig:1dchi2 ] ) clearly _ underestimates _ the nifs velocity dispersion ( top right panel ) for the central - most points . the uniformly large central @xmath226 values in the inner @xmath227 region are much better fitted by larger values of @xmath228 and @xmath218 ( blue curve ) . both the models do an equally good job of fitting , , and @xmath66 from the mmt data , but overestimate from the kpno data . another important point to note is that the values of the gh parameters @xmath67 are _ negative _ in the innermost regions of each of the three datasets . neither model is able to fit the negative @xmath67 values measured with the mmt spectrograph nor the central dips to negative values in @xmath67 seen in the nifs data and kpno data . in spherical and axisymmetric galaxies , @xmath67 is negative when the velocity distribution is tangentially biased ; it is positive when orbits are predominantly radial ; and it is zero when the velocity distribution in isotropic @xcite . however , negative @xmath67 values have also been associated specifically with the presence of a bar . in recent @xmath229-body simulations of barred galaxies by @xcite , the losvds have negative @xmath67 values in the region where the bar dominates . the negative @xmath67 parameters arise due to the kinematic properties of the special orbits that constitute the bar , and due to the fact that from an external observer s point of view , the bar has a large tangential velocity component due to its pattern speed . even after a bar buckles and forms a boxy bulge , negative @xmath67 values can be seen in face - on systems @xcite . another signature of the kinematics associated with a nuclear bar is undulations in the rising part of the inner rotation curve @xcite , which we also see in the mmt data for ngc 4151 . finally , while @xmath66 is always anti - correlated with the line - of - sight velocity in axisymmetric systems , @xcite show that @xmath66 is _ correlated _ with along the major axis of the bar . for the data obtained with kpno ( where the slit lies along the major axis of the large scale bar ) @xmath66 is correlated with over the radial range @xmath230 ( figure [ fig : kinematics_90_1d ] ) , providing additional kinematical evidence for a bar . therefore it appears that despite the very circular photometric contours of the bulge in ngc 4151 , and the visual appearance of a rather weak bar at radii outside the bulge , there are several clear kinematical signatures of a small scale bar in the vicinity of the nuclear bh . this is consistent with the properties of `` barlens '' features that have recently been identified in real and simulated galaxies @xcite . as pointed out by @xcite , barlenses frequently masquerade as classical bulges because of their nearly circular central isophotes , especially when viewed nearly face - on , but have bar - like kinematics . the combination of bars and bhs can have significant implications for the central dynamics of galaxies . @xcite analyze a suite of @xmath229-body simulations of barred galaxies in which point masses representing bhs were grown adiabatically . they find that the growth of a bh of a given mass causes a 5 - 10% larger increase in @xmath63 in a barred galaxy than in an otherwise identical axisymmetric galaxy . @xcite find that if a disk galaxy with a bulge has a pre - existing black hole , the formation and evolution of a bar can result in a 15 - 40% increase in the central velocity dispersion . both studies find that the increase in the observed line - of - sight velocity dispersion in the barred systems is a consequence of three separate factors : ( a ) mass inflow due to angular momentum transport by the bar , ( b ) velocity anisotropy due to the presence of bar orbits , and ( c ) weak dependence on orientation of position angle of the bar . if ngc 4151 does have a bar and is thus non - axisymmetric , that fact also has implications for our modeling results . in stellar dynamical modeling of axisymmetric galaxies , fitting a negative @xmath67 requires a larger fraction of tangential orbits , which contribute little to the line - of - sight velocity dispersion . fitting a given velocity dispersion with such an orbit population will imply a larger enclosed mass than would be required if @xmath67 was zero or positive ( which is typically the case in axisymmetric systems with bhs ) . @xcite argue that if an axisymmetric stellar dynamical modeling code is used to derive the value of @xmath0 in a barred galaxy with a high central @xmath231 and a negative @xmath67 , the central bh mass will be systematically overestimated . if the large values of @xmath231 in the nuclear regions and the negative @xmath67 values in the mmt data are a consequence a nuclear bar , then the discrepancy between @xmath127 and @xmath125 could reflect this predicted bias in @xmath0 . in this section we examine the consequences of fitting only the nifs kinematical data ( ignoring the kinematical constraints at larger radii obtained from the lower spatial resolution long - slit spectra from kpno and mmt ) . there are three reasons why the nifs data alone may provide better constraints on the mass of the bh . first , the nifs data have higher spatial resolution ( 02 ) than the long slit data ( 1 - 2 ) . for a @xmath232 , the sphere - of - influence of the bh ( assuming @xmath233 ; see section [ sec : msigma ] below ) is @xmath1216 pc , which corresponds to @xmath12 024 for our assumed distance of 13.9 mpc for this galaxy . therefore the nifs data used in our modeling are barely able to resolve the sphere - of - influence of the bh , but are quite close to doing so . if @xmath234 , the sphere - of - influence of the bh would be 26 pc ( 038 ) and the bh sphere - of - influence would be resolved by the nifs data . the long slit data do not provide constraints on @xmath0 and are included mainly to provide constraints on the mass - to - light ratio of the stars , which is assumed to be independent of radius . second , as discussed previously , the nifs velocity dispersion within @xmath235 is significantly larger than the velocity dispersion on same physical scale obtained from the long - slit data . however , since the error bars on the long - slit mmt data are about half those from the nifs data , the optimization code tries to fit them better than the nifs data . in figure [ fig : kinenifs_90 ] ( top two panels ) , the need to fit the lower velocity dispersion values from mmt manifests as low velocity dispersion values ( blue ) at the edges of the nifs field . these low dispersion values outside the sphere - of - influence of the bh also force the model to adopt a lower mass - to - light ratio , which is then compensated for in the inner region by requiring a much larger to fit the nifs velocity dispersion . neglecting the long - slit data would allow the optimization code to raise the mass - to - light ratio in the inner @xmath532 region ( where the velocity dispersion is quite flat ) . finally , in figure [ fig : kinematics_90_1d ] , we see kinematic evidence for the bar in mmt and kpno long - slit data ( negative @xmath67 values and undulations in the rising part of the rotation curve seen in mmt data ; correlation between @xmath66 and @xmath236 in kpno data ) occurring on scales of 3 - 5 , well outside the nuclear region . except for the central value of @xmath67 in the nifs dataset ( which , as we see from fig . [ fig.spec ] , is contaminated by the agn ) , all the other @xmath67 values are positive , which is what is expected for orbits around a central bh . neglecting the long - slit kinematical data could help overcome biases introduced by the bar kinematics . assuming that the bh mass should primarily be constrained by kinematic constraints at the smallest radii we now test the effect of not including the long - slit data in the nnls optimization problem . the expectation is that neglecting the long - slit data should bring the best - fit solutions obtained from @xmath183 and @xmath178 closer to each other . we construct a full sets of models ( 18 values of @xmath0 and 18 values of @xmath95 ) in which we only fitted the nuclear kinematical data obtained with the nifs spectrograph , with an orbit library of @xmath211 . figure [ fig : nifs_only ] shows @xmath138 values obtained by marginalizing over @xmath95 ( top ) and by marginalizing over @xmath0 ( middle ) . the solid curves show @xmath237 while the dashed curves show @xmath238 . the dotted horizontal lines show the 1@xmath4 , 2@xmath4 and 3@xmath4 confidence levels , respectively ( for 1 degree - of - freedom ) . the top plot shows that the minimum @xmath178 ( dashed curve ) has decreased quite significantly and is now in agreement with the minimum @xmath183 ( solid curve ) . the best - fit values of @xmath95 ( middle panel ) are still inconsistent within 1@xmath4 but are consistent within 3@xmath4 . the bottom - most panel shows the error on the fit to the mass and surface brightness distribution . contours are spaced at intervals of 0.1% error per constraint . it is clear that the fit to the self - consistency constraints is uniform over a much larger range of @xmath0 and @xmath95 values implying that the fit to the mass is no longer a significant factor in determining the location of the minimum . the best fit black hole mass and m / l ratio obtained using @xmath237 and @xmath238 , along with the reduced @xmath138 and 1@xmath4 and 3@xmath4 error bars , are shown in the bottom two rows of table [ tab : robustbestfit ] . since the best fit @xmath0 values and their 1@xmath4 error bars from both methods of computing @xmath1 are nearly the same we use the average of the two best - fit values as the solution and sum their 1@xmath4 errors in quadrature to obtain @xmath239 . figure [ fig : nifs_only ] shows that the @xmath95 values obtained from @xmath178 are consistent with the best fit value obtained with @xmath183 at the 3@xmath4 level , but both are well within the expected range @xmath240 . therefore we use the average of the two best - fit m / l values and sum their 3@xmath4 errors in quadrature to get @xmath241 . the bottom panel of figure [ fig : kinenifs_90 ] shows a 2d kinematic map for a model with @xmath219 and @xmath242 , with parameters closest to the best - fit solution obtained with @xmath125 ( see 3rd row of table [ tab : robustbestfit ] ) . this model achieves adequately large values of @xmath231 ( see red / orange regions ) over the central nifs field by raising the m / l ratio very slightly from @xmath243 to @xmath244 . the 1d kinematic fit of this model to the nifs data along the kinematic major axis of the model is shown by the green curves in figure [ fig : kinematics_90_1d ] , from which it is also clear that the lower value of @xmath0 is able to fit the high velocity dispersion values even better than the high bh mass when the model attempted to fit both the nifs and long - slit kinematic data . this test largely confirms our hypothesis that the two main causes of the large value of @xmath0 obtained in the previous section were ( a ) inconsistencies between @xmath231 values from nifs and the long - slit data in the same spatial region , ( b ) the need to fit the low @xmath67 values and high central @xmath231 values with a low m / l ratio . thus , we see that by not including the kinematics data with poorer spatial resolution ( which are clearly unaffected by the bh as can be seen in figure [ fig : kinenifs_90 ] ) we are able to simultaneously fit the nifs kinematics and the mass and surface brightness distributions with a lower value of @xmath0 . in this section , we determine how the new nifs kinematic measurements in the nuclear region of ngc 4151 affect the galaxy s location in the @xmath15 relation . the aperture used to define the appropriate @xmath4 value for the relation is a historically contentious issue ( e.g. * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ) , but the nifs data naturally lend themselves to one of those standards : @xmath245 , which is the velocity dispersion within an aperture of radius @xmath246/8 , where @xmath246 is the bulge effective radius @xcite . ( despite having to adopt one particular standard , we note that @xcite found no systematic differences between estimates of @xmath245 ( inside of @xmath246/8 ) and estimates of @xmath4 that extended out to @xmath246 , likely because of the steep radial surface brightness gradient in most bulges . ) the @xmath246 value for ngc 4151 has been measured to be @xmath247 @xcite , while the nifs field - of - view extends to a radius of between @xmath86 and @xmath248 . thus , we sum the nifs datacube across all of the spaxels into a single spectrum , and fit for the dispersion using ppxf . from the nifs data , we find @xmath249 . this is somewhat larger than either the @xmath250 measured by @xcite , or the @xmath251 measured by @xcite . both of those earlier measurements used the calcium triplet absorption lines , but whereas the former covered a similar region of the galaxy as our nifs spectra ( @xmath252 ) , the latter used an aperture of @xmath253 . previous studies of bulge kinematics have found near - ir and optical data to give consistent results ( see * ? ? ? * and references therein ) , while the discrepancies seen in some luminous ir galaxies are in the sense of _ smaller _ @xmath4 values from the co - bandheads @xcite . our new measurement of @xmath254 is @xmath1225% above the previous velocity dispersion measurements , while our best - fit stellar dynamical estimate of @xmath255 is 17% below our earlier stellar dynamical estimate @xcite . previously , ngc 4151 had been an outlier from the agn @xmath15 relation in the direction of low-@xmath4 or high-@xmath0 . the new @xmath245 and @xmath0 measurements helps to bring ngc 4151 closer to the best - fit relation of @xcite , though it does remain on the low-@xmath4 side . finally , we note that if the bh masses in barred galaxies have been overestimated due to the use of axisymmetric dynamical modeling codes , such galaxies would lie even further below the standard relation than has been found previously ( * ? ? ? * and references therein ) . this demonstrates the importance of developing robust bar dynamical modeling approaches in the future . we have conducted ao - assisted near - ir integral field spectroscopy of the local seyfert galaxy ngc 4151 , using the nifs instrument on gemini north . we used an axisymmetric orbit - superposition code to fit the observed surface brightness distribution within 50 , nifs kinematics within @xmath5315 , and long slit kinematics along two different position angles in order to estimate the best - fit values of the mass of the bh ( @xmath0 ) and the mass - to - light ratio of the stars ( @xmath95 ) . models were constructed for 10 - 18 values of @xmath0 , 18 values of @xmath95 and 3 different inclination angles . the main results of this paper are summarized below . we use the @xmath1 estimator to determine the model which gives the best - fit to the data but find that the solution depends on whether the @xmath1 includes both self - consistency constraints ( which are not strictly speaking `` data '' ) and kinematic constraints or only kinematic constraints . when we use both types of constraints and all the available kinematical data ( from low - resolution long - slit data and high resolution nifs data ) the best - fit solution is @xmath256 and @xmath175 , for a model with @xmath101 . however , this best fit model gives a central @xmath231 that is too low to fit the data obtained with the nifs instrument . when we use @xmath127 ( determined by only considering the fit to the kinematic data ) , the best fit model has @xmath257 and @xmath258 , and provides a better fit to the nuclear kinematical data from nifs spectrograph , although it gives a slightly worse fit to the mass and surface brightness distributions . an interesting point worth noting is that @xcite found a best - fit value of @xmath259 in ngc 4151 when they fitted the kinematics of the h@xmath260 line - emitting gas within 1 of the center ( see figure 43 in their paper ) . however , if they included the kinematics of gas within 2 they obtained a larger value of @xmath261 , although with a somewhat worse reduced-@xmath1 . it is intriguing that both our stellar dynamical modeling and their gas dynamical modeling , while preferring lower values of @xmath262 , also suggest that _ higher _ values of @xmath0 may be obtained when lower spatial resolution data are included in the fit . models are generated for three different inclination angles of the bulge @xmath263 and show that the best - fit @xmath0 and @xmath95 values are relatively insensitive to inclination angle . we examine an additional 4 inclination angles for fixed bh mass values ( @xmath264 ) and fixed mass - to - light ratio ( @xmath265 ) . we find that edge - on models ( @xmath101 ) give the smallest @xmath1 values , while models with the inclination of the large scale disk ( @xmath103 ) are strongly disfavored . this suggests that the bulge must be nearly spherical but its rotation axis is significantly misaligned from the rotation axis of the disk . however , it is well known from previous work @xcite that inclination of a spheroid is extremely difficult to determine via dynamical modelling , especially in the presence of a bar . this determination of the inclination of the bulge should therefore be treated with caution . a detailed examination of the kinematics in the inner 5 of ngc 4151 shows evidence for bar kinematics , which manifest as high values of @xmath231 , low or negative values of @xmath67 and @xmath66 values which are correlated with @xmath236 . we hypothesize that the discrepancy between the @xmath1 obtained from including all the constraints and that obtained by only including the kinematic constraints is likely a consequence of two factors : ( a ) a stellar bar , which is not possible to model with our axisymmetric code , and ( b ) inconsistencies between the velocity dispersion values obtained from the low - spatial resolution long - slit data and the high spatial resolution nifs data over the same spatial range . this hypothesis was tested by fitting only the nifs data . when we fit only the kinematical data obtained with the nifs spectrograph ( neglecting all kinematical constraints beyond @xmath266 - i.e those data that show kinematical evidence for a bar and data that is discrepant with high - resolution nifs data ) , the non - negative optimization problem was able to find a much better fit to the nifs data and the same best - fit @xmath0 was obtained by both methods of computing @xmath1 . the stellar - dynamical modeling carried out in this paper gives a best - fit value of @xmath267 ( obtained by averaging over the @xmath125 and @xmath127 values in the lower two rows of table [ tab : robustbestfit ] ) which is consistent at the 1@xmath4 level with the reverberation mapping - based mass of @xmath268 ( 1@xmath4 errors ) obtained by using data from @xcite , but relying on a recently updated empirical calibration of the rm mass scale by @xcite . the best fit m / l ratio @xmath269 ( 3@xmath4 error ) is consistent with the photometrically derived mass - to - light ratio of @xmath270 . the new nifs data yields @xmath254 , the velocity dispersion within @xmath271 , which is @xmath1225% larger than previous values , while the new best estimate of @xmath272 17% smaller than but fully consistent with both our previous stellar dynamical upper limit @xcite and the dynamical estimate based on h@xmath260 line - emitting gas @xcite . the larger value of @xmath245 and smaller value of @xmath0 help to bring ngc 4151 closer to the best - fit relation of @xcite . the analysis in this paper demonstrates that biased estimates of bh masses can arise when an axisymmetric orbit superposition code is used to model a galaxy with a weak , but kinematically identifiable barred galaxy , possibly resulting in an over - estimate in @xmath0 if the m / l ratio is constrained primarily by data beyond the sphere - of - influence of the bh . this confirms the prediction made from the recent analysis of @xmath229-body simulations of barred galaxies with bhs by @xcite , and points to the need for new dynamical modeling tools capable of modeling a stellar bar . when such codes are applied to the existing sample of barred galaxies , our results suggest that it will likely enhance the discrepancy between barred and unbarred galaxies in the @xmath15 relation @xcite . our modeling of this complex system suggests that the standard practice of fitting kinematical constraints over a large range of radii with a constant mass - to - light ratio ( for exceptions to this practice , see * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ) can bias the mass of the central bh and the derived mass - to - light ratio . to some extent , the biases can be overcome by only considering the kinematics very close to the central bh , although this gives larger errors on the estimated solutions of @xmath0 and @xmath95 . our tests of robustness demonstrate that the use of such high spatial resolution nuclear kinematical data in such modeling is very valuable . however , the complications of the stellar dynamical bar imply that additional work is required in order to perform the crucial test of the rm mass scale calibration in this galaxy . only with improved non - axisymmetric modeling methods and/or bh mass measurements in other reverberation - mapped agns will we ultimately be able to assess whether the growth history of the bhs that we see accreting at present is systematically different from those currently in quiescence . we thank remco van den bosch for valuable input and for providing his symmetrization routine . we thank gaelle dumas and eric emsellem for providing us with the sauron integral field kinematics . we thank linda watson for providing copies of her nifs stellar velocity template spectra . we thank the anonymous referee for suggestions that helped to improve our manuscript . we are grateful to michele cappellari for making his analysis routines publicly available and for his continuing efforts in adding software features . m. valluri and jb were supported by national science foundation grant ast-0908346 , and m. valluri acknowledges support from the university of michigan s elizabeth crosby award . bmp and rwp are grateful to the national science foundation for support of this work through grant ast-1008882 to the ohio state university . mb gratefully acknowledges support by the national science foundation under grant ast-1253702 . m. vestergaard acknowledges support from a freja fellowship granted by the dean of the faculty of natural sciences at the university of copenhagen and a marie curie international incoming fellowship . the research leading to these results has received funding from the people programme ( marie curie actions ) of the european union s seventh framework programme fp7/2007 - 2013/ under rea grant agreement no . 300553 ( mv ) . the dark cosmology centre is funded by the danish national research foundation . based on observations obtained at the gemini observatory , which is operated by the association of universities for research in astronomy , inc . , under a cooperative agreement with the nsf on behalf of the gemini partnership : the national science foundation ( united states ) , the science and technology facilities council ( united kingdom ) , the national research council ( canada ) , conicyt ( chile ) , the australian research council ( australia ) , ministrio da cincia e tecnologia ( brazil ) and ministerio de ciencia , tecnologa e innovacin productiva ( argentina ) . this research was supported in part through computational resources and services provided by advanced research computing and the flux cluster at the university of michigan , ann arbor . this work made use of data from the ohio state university bright spiral galaxy survey , which was funded by grants ast-9217716 and ast-9617006 from the united states national science foundation , with additional support from the ohio state university . based on observations made with the nasa / esa hubble space telescope , obtained from the data archive at the space telescope institute . stsci is operated by the association of universities for research in astronomy , inc . under the nasa contract nas 5 - 26555 . funding for the sdss and sdss - ii has been provided by the alfred p. sloan foundation , the participating institutions , the national science foundation , the u.s . department of energy , the national aeronautics and space administration , the japanese monbukagakusho , the max planck society , and the higher education funding council for england . the sdss is managed by the astrophysical research consortium for the participating institutions . the participating institutions are the american museum of natural history , astrophysical institute potsdam , university of basel , university of cambridge , case western reserve university , university of chicago , drexel university , fermilab , the institute for advanced study , the japan participation group , johns hopkins university , the joint institute for nuclear astrophysics , the kavli institute for particle astrophysics and cosmology , the korean scientist group , the chinese academy of sciences ( lamost ) , los alamos national laboratory , the max - planck - institute for astronomy ( mpia ) , the max - planck - institute for astrophysics ( mpa ) , new mexico state university , ohio state university , university of pittsburgh , university of portsmouth , princeton university , the united states naval observatory , and the university of washington . this research has made use of the nasa / ipac extragalactic database ( ned ) which is operated by the jet propulsion laboratory , california institute of technology , under contract with the national aeronautics and space administration . this research has made use of the simbad database , operated at cds , strasbourg , france . , m. c. , denney , k. d. , cackett , e. m. , dietrich , m. , fogel , j. k. j. , ghosh , h. , horne , k. , kuehn , c. , minezaki , t. , onken , c. a. , peterson , b. m. , pogge , r. w. , pronik , v. i. , richstone , d. o. , sergeev , s. g. , vestergaard , m. , walker , m. g. , & yoshii , y. 2006 , , 651 , 775 , m. c. , walsh , j. l. , barth , a. j. , baliber , n. , bennert , v. n. , canalizo , g. , filippenko , a. v. , ganeshalingam , m. , gates , e. l. , greene , j. e. , hidas , m. g. , hiner , k. d. , lee , n. , li , w. , malkan , m. a. , minezaki , t. , sakata , y. , serduke , f. j. d. , silverman , j. m. , steele , t. n. , stern , d. , street , r. a. , thornton , c. e. , treu , t. , wang , x. , woo , j .- h . , & yoshii , y. 2009 , , 705 , 199 , m. c. , walsh , j. l. , barth , a. j. , yoshii , y. , woo , j .- h . , wang , x. , treu , t. , thornton , c. e. , street , r. a. , steele , t. n. , silverman , j. m. , serduke , f. j. d. , sakata , y. , minezaki , t. , malkan , m. a. , li , w. , lee , n. , hiner , k. d. , hidas , m. g. , greene , j. e. , gates , e. l. , ganeshalingam , m. , filippenko , a. v. , canalizo , g. , bennert , v. n. , & baliber , n. 2010 , , 716 , 993 , g. , de vaucouleurs , a. , corwin , jr . , h. g. , buta , r. j. , paturel , g. , & fouqu , p. 1991 , third reference catalogue of bright galaxies . volume i : explanations and references . volume ii : data for galaxies between 0@xmath273 and 12@xmath273 . volume iii : data for galaxies between 12@xmath273 and 24@xmath273 . ( springer - verlag : new york ) , p. b. , frogel , j. a. , pogge , r. w. , quillen , a. c. , berlind , a. a. , davies , r. l. , depoy , d. l. , gilbert , k. m. , houdashelt , m. l. , kuchinski , l. e. , ramrez , s. v. , sellgren , k. , stutz , a. , terndrup , d. m. , & tiede , g. p. 2002 , , 143 , 73 , k. , richstone , d. , tremaine , s. , lauer , t. r. , bender , r. , bower , g. , dressler , a. , faber , s. m. , filippenko , a. v. , green , r. , grillmair , c. , ho , l. c. , kormendy , j. , magorrian , j. , & pinkney , j. 2003 , , 583 , 92 , c. l. , merritt , d. , olling , r. , valluri , m. , bender , r. , bower , g. , danks , a. , gull , t. , hutchings , j. , kaiser , m. e. , maran , s. , weistrop , d. , woodgate , b. , malumuth , e. , nelson , c. , plait , p. , & lindler , d. 2001 , , 550 , 668 , p .- y . , cappellari , m. , emsellem , e. , bournaud , f. , michel - dansac , l. , alatalo , k. , blitz , l. , bois , m. , bureau , m. , davies , r. l. , davis , t. a. , de zeeuw , p. t. , duc , p .- a . , khochfar , s. , krajnovi , d. , kuntschner , h. , morganti , r. , mcdermid , r. m. , naab , t. , oosterloo , t. , sarzi , m. , scott , n. , serra , p. , weijmans , a .- m . , & young , l. m. 2012 , , 424 , 1495 , p. j. , hart , j. , conroy , p. g. , pfitzner , m. l. , bloxham , g. j. , jones , d. j. , downing , m. d. , dawson , m. , young , p. , jarnyk , m. , & van harmelen , j. 2003 , in society of photo - optical instrumentation engineers ( spie ) conference series , vol . 4841 , society of photo - optical instrumentation engineers ( spie ) conference series , ed . m. iye & a. f. m. moorwood , 15811591 , c. a. , valluri , m. , peterson , b. m. , pogge , r. w. , bentz , m. c. , ferrarese , l. , vestergaard , m. , crenshaw , d. m. , sergeev , s. g. , mchardy , i. m. , merritt , d. , bower , g. a. , heckman , t. m. , & wandel , a. 2007 , , 670 , 105 ( paper i ) , s. , gebhardt , k. , bender , r. , bower , g. , dressler , a. , faber , s. m. , filippenko , a. v. , green , r. , grillmair , c. , ho , l. c. , kormendy , j. , lauer , t. r. , magorrian , j. , pinkney , j. , & richstone , d. 2002 , , 574 , 740 , j .- h . , treu , t. , barth , a. j. , wright , s. a. , walsh , j. l. , bentz , m. c. , martini , p. , bennert , v. n. , canalizo , g. , filippenko , a. v. , gates , e. , greene , j. , li , w. , malkan , m. a. , stern , d. , & minezaki , t. 2010 , , 716 , 269 Abstract:

Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.

Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered . Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video . Paper: [ [ stress - fluctuation - formalism . ] ] stress fluctuation formalism . + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + among the fundamental properties of any solid material are its elastic constants @xcite . they describe the macroscopic response to weak external deformations and encode information about the potential landscape of the system . in their seminal work @xcite squire , holt and hoover derived an expression for the isothermal elastic constants extending the classical born theory @xcite to canonical ensembles of imposed particle number @xmath11 , volume @xmath12 and _ finite _ ( mean ) temperature @xmath5 . they found a correction term @xmath13 to the born expression for the elastic constants which involves the mean - square fluctuations of the stress @xcite @xmath14 with @xmath15 being the inverse temperature , @xmath16 boltzmann s constant , @xmath17 the instantaneous value of a component of the stress tensor @xmath18 and greek letters denoting the spatial coordinates in @xmath19 dimension . perhaps due to the fact that the demonstration of the stress fluctuation formalism " in ref . @xcite assumed explicitly a well - defined reference position and a displacement field for the particles , it has not been appreciated that this approach is consistent ( at least if the initial pressure is properly taken into account ) with the well - known pressure fluctuation formula for the compression modulus @xmath20 of isotropic fluids @xcite which has been derived several decades earlier , presumably for the first time in the late 1940s by rowlinson @xcite . in any case , the stress fluctuation formalism provides a convenient route to calculating the elastic properties in computer simulations which has been widely used in the past @xcite . it has been generalized to systems with nonzero initial stress @xcite , hard - sphere interactions @xcite and arbitrary continuous potentials @xcite , or to the calculation of local mechanical properties @xcite . [ [ low - temperature - limit - and - non - affine - displacements . ] ] low - temperature limit and non - affine displacements . + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + in particular from ref . @xcite it has become clear that the stress fluctuation correction to the leading born term does not necessarily vanish in the zero - temperature limit . this is due to the fact that when a system is subjected to a homogeneous deformation , the ensuing particle displacements need not follow the macroscopic strain affinely @xcite . the stress fluctuation term quantifies the extent of these non - affine displacements , whereas the born term reflects the affine part of the particle displacements . how important the non - affine motions are , depends on the system under consideration @xcite . while the elastic properties of crystals with one atom per unit cell are given by the born term only , stress fluctuations are significant for crystals with more complex unit cells @xcite . they become particularly pronounced for polymer like soft materials @xcite and amorphous solids @xcite . this is revealed by recent simulation studies of various glass formers @xcite , like lennard - jones ( lj ) mixtures @xcite , polymer glasses @xcite or silica melts @xcite . many of these simulation studies concentrate on the mechanical properties deep in the glassy state , exploring for instance correlations between the non - affine displacement field and vibrational anomalies of the glass ( boson peak " ) @xcite , the mechanical heterogeneity at the nanoscale @xcite or the onset of molecular plasticity in the regime where the macroscopic deformation is still elastic @xcite . [ [ shear - stress - and - shear - modulus . ] ] shear stress and shear modulus . + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + surprisingly , the temperature dependence of the elastic constants of glassy materials does not appear to have been investigated extensively using the stress fluctuation formalism @xcite . following the pioneering work by barrat _ @xcite , we present in this work such a study where we focus on the behavior of the shear modulus @xmath0 of two isotropic colloidal glass - formers in @xmath1 and @xmath2 dimensions sampled , respectively , by means of molecular dynamics ( md ) and monte carlo ( mc ) simulations @xcite . since we are interested in isotropic systems one can avoid the inconvenient tensorial notation of the full stress fluctuation formalism as shown in fig . [ fig_sketch ] . focusing on the shear in the @xmath21-plane we use @xmath22 for the mean shear stress and @xmath23 for its instantaneous value . as an important contribution to the shear modulus we shall monitor the shear stress fluctuations @xmath24 as a function of temperature @xmath5 . quite generally , the shear modulus @xmath0 may then be computed according to the stress fluctuation formula @xcite @xmath25 where @xmath26 stands for the so - called affine shear elasticity " corresponding to an assumed _ affine _ response to an external shear strain @xmath3 . for pairwise interaction potentials it can be shown that @xmath27 i.e. @xmath26 comprises the so - called born - lam coefficient " @xmath28 , a simple moment of the first and the second derivative of the pair potential with respect to the distance of the interacting particles @xcite , and the excess contribution @xmath29 to the total pressure @xmath6 . these notations will be properly defined in sec . [ theo_stressfluctu ] below where a simple derivation will be given . since eq . ( [ eq_gmodtt ] ) is not the only operational definition of the shear modulus discussed in this work , an index has been added reminding that the shear stress @xmath30 is used for the determination of @xmath0 . [ [ physical - motivation - and - systems - of - interest . ] ] physical motivation and systems of interest . + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + if an infinitesimal shear stress @xmath4 is applied at time @xmath31 , an isotropic solid exhibits , quite generally , an elastic response quantified in strength by a finite static ( @xmath32-independent ) shear modulus ( @xmath33 ) as shown by the top curve in fig . [ fig_sketch](b ) , whereas a liquid has a vanishing modulus ( @xmath34 ) and flows on long time scales as shown by the bottom curve . the shear modulus @xmath0 can thus serve as an order parameter " distinguishing liquid and solid states @xcite . upon melting , the shear modulus of crystalline solids is known to vanish discontinuously with @xmath5 . a natural question which arises is that of the behavior of @xmath35 for amorphous solids and glasses in the vicinity of the glass transition temperature @xmath9 . interestingly , qualitative different theoretical predictions have been put forward by mode - coupling theory ( mct ) @xcite and some versions of replica theory @xcite predicting a _ discontinuous jump _ at the glass transition whereas other versions of replica theory @xcite suggest a _ continuous _ transition in the static limit of large sampling times @xmath32 . ( see ref . @xcite for a topical recent discussion of the replica approach . ) the numerical characterization of @xmath35 for colloidal glass - former is thus of high current interest . since the stress fluctuation formalism can readily be added to the standard simulation codes of colloidal glass - formers @xcite at imposed particle number @xmath11 , box volume @xmath12 , box shape ( @xmath36 ) and temperature @xmath5 , called @xmath37-ensembles , this suggests the use of eq . ( [ eq_gmodtt ] ) to tackle this issue . note that the latter stress fluctuation relation should also be useful for wide range of related systems , beyond the scope of the present work , including the glass transition of polymeric liquids @xcite , colloidal gels @xcite and self - assembled networks @xcite as observed experimentally for hyperbranched polymer chains with sticky end - groups @xcite or bridged networks of telechelic polymers in water - oil emulsions @xcite . [ [ validity - through - a - solid - liquid - transition . ] ] validity through a solid - liquid transition . + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + this begs the delicate question of whether the general stress fluctuation formalism and especially eq . ( [ eq_gmodtt ] ) for the shear modulus only holds for elastic solids with a well - defined displacement field , as suggested in the early literature @xcite , or if the approach may actually be also applied _ through _ a solid - liquid transition up to the liquid state @xcite with @xmath38 and thus @xmath39 as it should for a liquid . by reworking the theoretical arguments leading to eq . ( [ eq_gmodtt ] ) it will be seen that this is in principal the case , at least if standard thermodynamics can be assumed to apply . the latter point is indeed not self - evident for the colloidal glasses we are interested in where _ ( i ) _ some degrees of freedom are frozen on the time scale probed and _ ( ii ) _ the measured response to an imposed infinitesimal shear @xmath4 may depend on the sampling time @xmath32 , especially for temperatures @xmath5 around @xmath9 as shown in fig . [ fig_sketch](b ) . to be on the safe side , it thus appears to be appropriate to test numerically the applicability of the stress fluctuation formula , eq . ( [ eq_gmodtt ] ) , using the corresponding strain fluctuation relations which are more fundamental on experimental grounds . [ [ strain - fluctuation - relations . ] ] strain fluctuation relations . + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + panel ( a ) of fig . [ fig_sketch ] shows a schematic setup for probing experimentally the shear modulus @xmath0 of isotropic systems confined between two rigid walls . we assume that the bottom wall is fixed and the particle number @xmath11 , the ( mean ) normal pressure @xmath6 and the ( mean ) temperature @xmath5 are kept constant . in linear response either a shear strain @xmath40 or a ( mean ) shear stress @xmath4 may be imposed . the thin solid line indicates the original unstrained reference system with @xmath36 and @xmath41 , the dashed line the deformed state . from both the mechanical and the thermodynamical point of view , the shear modulus is defined as @xmath42 where the derivative may also be taken at @xmath41 . in practice , one obtains @xmath0 by fitting a linear slope to the @xmath43-data at vanishing strain . obviously , the noise level is normally large for small strains . from the numerical point of view it would thus be more appropriate to work at imposed mean stress @xmath41 , to let the strain freely fluctuate and to sample the _ instantaneous _ values @xmath44 . the shear modulus @xmath0 is then simply obtained by linear regression @xmath45 where the index indicates that both the instantaneous values @xmath46 and @xmath30 are used . ( note that imposing the strain @xmath3 also fixes the instantaneous strain @xmath46 which thus can not fluctuate . ) the associated dimensionless correlation coefficient @xmath47 allows to determine the quality of the fit . we do not know whether eq . ( [ eq_gmodgt ] ) and eq . ( [ eq_cmodgt ] ) have actually been used in a real experiment , however since no difficulty arises to work in a computer simulation at constant @xmath4 and to record @xmath44 , we use this linear regression as our key operational definition of @xmath0 which is used to judge the correctness of the stress fluctuation relation , eq . ( [ eq_gmodtt ] ) , computed at constant @xmath3 . to avoid additional physics at the walls , we use of course periodic boundary conditions @xcite ( the central image being sketched ) as shown by the panels on the right - hand side of fig . [ fig_sketch ] . as discussed in sec . [ theo_legendre ] , it is possible to determine @xmath48 at constant volume ( @xmath49-ensemble ) as shown by panel ( c ) or constant normal pressure ( @xmath50-ensemble ) as shown by panel ( e ) . the latter ensemble has the advantage that one can easily impose in addition the same normal pressure @xmath6 for all temperatures @xmath5 as it is justified for experimental reasons . if thermodynamics holds , it is known ( sec . [ theo_strainfluctu ] ) that @xmath51 should hold @xcite . using eq . ( [ eq_gmodgt ] ) this implies a second operational definition @xmath52 which has the advantage that only the instantaneous shear strain @xmath46 has to be recorded . the main technical point put forward in this paper is that all operational definitions yield similar results @xmath53 even for temperatures where a strong dependence on the sampling time @xmath32 is observed . in other words , eq . ( [ eq_gmods ] ) states that this time dependence applies similarly ( albeit perhaps not exactly ) to the various moments computed for the three operational definitions of @xmath0 in different ensembles . [ [ outline . ] ] outline . + + + + + + + + the paper is organized as follows : several theoretical issues are regrouped in sec . [ sec_theo ] . we begin the discussion in sec . [ theo_strainfluctu ] by reminding a few useful general thermodynamic relations . a simple derivation of the stress fluctuation formula , eq . ( [ eq_gmodtt ] ) , for the shear modulus @xmath54 in constant-@xmath3 ensembles is given in sec . [ theo_stressfluctu ] . ( the analogous stress fluctuation formula for the compression modulus @xmath20 in constant-@xmath12 ensembles @xcite is rederived in appendix [ app_kstressfluctu ] . ) shear stress fluctuations @xmath55 in ensembles with different boundary conditions are discussed in sec . [ theo_legendre ] . for constant-@xmath4 ensembles @xmath56 will be shown to reduce to the affine shear elasticity @xmath26 , i.e. the functional @xmath54 must vanish for all temperatures . as pointed out recently @xcite , the truncation of the interaction potentials used in computational studies implies an impulsive correction for the affine shear elasticity @xmath26 . this is summarized in sec . [ theo_trunc ] . the numerical models used in this study are presented in sec . [ sec_algo ] . we turn then in sec . [ sec_res ] to our main numerical results . starting with the high-@xmath5 liquid limit , sec . [ res_thigh ] shows that all our operational definitions correctly yield a vanishing shear modulus . moving to the opposite low-@xmath5 limit we present in sec . [ res_dynmat ] the elastic response for a topologically fixed network of harmonic springs constructed from the dynamical matrix " of our 2d model glass system @xcite . as shown in sec . [ res_tlow ] , the same behavior is found qualitatively for low-@xmath5 glassy bead systems . the temperature dependence of stress fluctuations and shear moduli in different ensembles is then discussed in sec . [ res_tvari ] . as stated above , one central goal of this work is to determine the behavior of the shear modulus around @xmath9 . we conclude the paper in sec . [ sec_conc ] . thermodynamic relations and numerical findings related to the compression modulus @xmath20 are regrouped in appendix [ app_k ] . we assume in the following that standard thermodynamics and thermostatistics @xcite can be applied and remind a few useful relations . let us denote an extensive variable by @xmath57 and its instantaneous value by @xmath58 , the conjugated intensive variable by @xmath59 and its instantaneous value by @xmath60 @xcite . with @xmath61 being the free energy at temperature @xmath5 and imposed @xmath57 , the intensive variable @xmath59 and the associated modulus @xmath62 are given by @xmath63 alternatively , one may consider the legendre transformation @xmath64 for which @xmath65 in our case , the extensive variable is @xmath66 , the intensive variable @xmath67 @xcite and the modulus @xmath68 @xcite . we emphasize that there is an important difference between extensive and intensive variables : if the extensive variable @xmath57 is fixed , @xmath58 can not fluctuate . if , on the other hand , the intensive variable @xmath69 is imposed , not only @xmath58 but also @xmath60 may fluctuate @xcite . in our case this means , that @xmath70 for the @xmath37-ensemble , while the shear stress fluctuations @xmath55 defined above do clearly not vanish in the @xmath49-ensemble shown in fig . [ fig_sketch](d ) . assuming @xmath59 to be imposed , it is well known that @xcite @xmath71 with @xmath15 being the inverse temperature . for our variables @xmath72 and @xmath73 , eq . ( [ eq_dxdi ] ) implies eq . ( [ eq_dgamdtau ] ) from which it is seen that eq . ( [ eq_gmodgt ] ) is consistent with eq . ( [ eq_gmodgg ] ) . the latter relation is also obtained directly using eq . ( [ eq_dxdx ] ) . as discussed in textbooks @xcite a simple average @xmath74 of some observable @xmath75 does not depend of the chosen ensemble , at least not if the system is large enough ( @xmath76 ) . a correlation function @xmath77 of two observables @xmath75 and @xmath78 may differ , however , depending on whether @xmath57 or @xmath59 are imposed . as demonstrated by lebowitz , percus and verlet in 1967 @xcite one verifies that @xmath79 if the extensive variable and at least one of the observables are identical , the left - hand side of eq . ( [ eq_dadb ] ) vanishes : if @xmath80 and @xmath81 , this yields eq . ( [ eq_dxdi ] ) . if @xmath82 , this implies eq . ( [ eq_dxdx ] ) . more importantly , for @xmath83 one obtains using eq . ( [ eq_ftom ] ) @xmath84 if it is possible to probe the intensive variable fluctuations in both ensembles , this does in principle allow to determine the modulus @xmath62 . ( the latter equation might actually be taken as the definition of @xmath62 in cases where the thermodynamic reasoning becomes dubious . ) we emphasize that the modulus @xmath62 is an intrinsic property of the system and does _ not _ depend on the ensemble , albeit it is determined using ensemble depending correlation functions . for a thermodynamically stable system , @xmath85 , eq . ( [ eq_didi ] ) implies that @xmath86 and that both fluctuations must become similar in the limit where the modulus @xmath62 becomes small . for the shear stress fluctuations @xmath55 , eq . ( [ eq_didi ] ) corresponds to the transformation @xmath87 and one thus expects @xmath55 to be larger for @xmath49-systems than for @xmath37-systems , while in the liquid limit where @xmath88 the imposed boundary conditions should not matter . we shall verify eq . ( [ eq_muftransform ] ) numerically below . a glance at the stress fluctuation formula , eq . ( [ eq_gmodtt ] ) , suggests the identity @xmath89 assuming eq . ( [ eq_dgamdtau ] ) and eq . ( [ eq_muamuftau ] ) , it follows for the correlation coefficient @xmath90 defined above that @xmath91 if the measured @xmath44 were indeed perfectly correlated , i.e. @xmath92 , this implies @xmath93 and thus @xmath94 . in fact , for all situations studied here we always have @xmath95 i.e. the affine shear elasticity sets only an upper bound to the shear modulus and a theory which only contains the affine strain response must _ overpredict _ @xmath0 . we show now directly that eq . ( [ eq_gmodtt ] ) and , hence , eqs . ( [ eq_muamuftau],[eq_cmodgt_mua],[eq_gbound ] ) indeed hold and this under quite general conditions . [ [ introduction . ] ] introduction . + + + + + + + + + + + + + as shown in fig . [ fig_sketch](a ) , we demonstrate eq . ( [ eq_gmodtt ] ) from the free energy change associated with an imposed arbitrarily small pure shear strain @xmath3 in the @xmath21-plane assuming a constant particle number @xmath11 , a constant volume @xmath12 and a constant temperature @xmath5 ( @xmath37-ensemble ) . it is supposed that the total system hamiltonian may be written as the sum of a kinetic energy and a potential energy . since for a plain shear strain at constant volume the ideal free energy contribution does not change , i.e. is irrelevant for @xmath4 and @xmath0 , we may focus on the excess free energy contribution @xmath96 due to the conservative interaction energy of the particles . the ( excess ) partition function @xmath97 of the unperturbed system at @xmath36 is the boltzmann - weighted sum over all states @xmath98 of the system which are _ accessible _ within the measurement time @xmath32 . the argument @xmath99 is a short - hand for the unstrained reference . following the derivation of the compression modulus @xmath20 by rowlinson @xcite the partition function @xmath100 of the sheared system is supposed to be the sum over the _ same _ states @xmath98 , but with a different _ metric _ @xcite corresponding to the macroscopic strain which changes the total interaction energy @xmath101 of state @xmath98 and , hence , the weight of the sheared configuration for the averages computed . this is the central hypothesis made . interestingly , it is not necessary to specify explicitly the states of the unperturbed or perturbed system , e.g. , it is irrelevant whether the particles are distinguishable or not or whether they have a well - defined reference position for defining a displacement field . [ [ shear - stress - and - modulus - for - general - potential . ] ] shear stress and modulus for general potential . + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + assuming eq . ( [ eq_fexgamma ] ) to hold we compute now the mean shear stress @xmath4 and the shear modulus @xmath0 for a general interaction potential @xmath101 . we note for later convenience that @xmath102 for the derivatives of the free energy and @xmath103 for the derivatives of the excess partition function where a prime denotes the derivative of a function @xmath104 with respect to its argument @xmath105 . using eq . ( [ eq_dzdgam ] ) and taking finally the limit @xmath106 one verifies for the shear stress that @xmath107 _ defining _ the instantaneous shear stress @xcite . note that the average taken is defined as @xmath108 using the weights of the unperturbed system . the shear stress thus measures the average change of the total interaction energy @xmath101 taken at @xmath36 . the shear modulus @xmath0 is obtained using in addition eq . ( [ eq_ddlogzddgam ] ) and eq . ( [ eq_ddzddgam ] ) and taking finally the @xmath106 limit . confirming thus the stress fluctuation formula eq . ( [ eq_gmodtt ] ) stated in the introduction , this yields @xmath109 with @xmath26 being the affine shear elasticity " @xmath110 already mentioned above and @xmath55 as defined in eq . ( [ eq_muf ] ) . the comparison of eq . ( [ eq_gstressfluctu ] ) and eq . ( [ eq_muftransform ] ) confirms eq . ( [ eq_muamuftau ] ) . [ [ comment . ] ] comment . + + + + + + + + the affine shear elasticity @xmath26 corresponds to the change ( second derivative ) of the total energy which would be obtained if one actually strains _ affinely _ in a computer simulation a given state @xmath98 without allowing the particles to relax their position . as shown for athermal ( @xmath111 ) amorphous bodies @xcite , the positions of the particles of such a strained configuration will of course in general change slightly to minimize the interaction energy relaxing thus the elastic moduli . this is also of relevance for thermalized solids where the non - affine displacements of the particles are driven by the minimization of the free energy . it is for this reason that the shear - stress fluctuation term @xmath112 must occur in eq . ( [ eq_gstressfluctu ] ) correcting the _ overprediction _ of the shear modulus @xmath0 by the affine shear elasticity @xmath26 , eq . ( [ eq_gbound ] ) . this point has been overlooked in the early literature @xcite and only appreciated much later @xcite as discussed in barrat s review @xcite . interestingly , as has been shown by lutsko @xcite , @xmath55 and other similarly defined stress fluctuations become temperature independent in the harmonic ground state approximation for @xmath111 . probing the stress fluctuations in a low - temperature simulation allows thus to determine the elastic moduli of athermal solids . please note that up to now we have not used explicitly the coordinate transformations ( metric change ) associated with an affine shear strain . this is needed to obtain operational definitions for the instantaneous shear stress @xmath30 ( and thus for @xmath4 and @xmath55 ) and the affine shear elasticity . [ [ coordinate - transformation . ] ] coordinate transformation . + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + as shown in fig . [ fig_sketch](a ) , we assume a pure shear strain which transforms the @xmath105-coordinate of a particle position or the distance between two particles as @xmath113 leaving all other coordinates unchanged @xcite . the squared distance @xmath114 between two particles thus transforms as @xmath115 where we need to keep the @xmath116-term for calculating the shear modulus below . we note for later reference that this implies @xmath117 for , respectively , the first and the second derivative with respect to @xmath3 . let us now consider an arbitrary function @xmath118 . using eq . ( [ eq_strain_rone ] ) it is readily seen that its first derivative with respect to @xmath3 may be written as @xmath119 in the second step we have introduced the components @xmath120 and @xmath121 of the normalized distance vector between both particles . more generally , we denote by @xmath122 the @xmath123-component of a normalized vector with @xmath124 stating only the small-@xmath3 limit for the second derivative of @xmath118 with respect to @xmath3 we note finally that @xmath125 where we have dropped the argument @xmath99 for the distance @xmath126 of the unperturbed reference system . [ [ pair - interaction - potentials . ] ] pair interaction potentials . + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + we assume now that the interaction energy @xmath101 of a configuration @xmath98 is given by a pair interaction potential @xmath127 between the particles @xcite with @xmath128 being the distance between two particles , i.e. @xmath129 where the index @xmath130 labels the interaction between the particles @xmath131 and @xmath132 with @xmath133 . using the general result eq . ( [ eq_tauhat_us ] ) for the shear stress it follows using eq . ( [ eq_strain_fronea ] ) that @xmath134 where we have dropped the argument @xmath99 in the @xmath106 limit . we have thus rederived for the shear stress ( @xmath135 ) the well - known kirkwood expression for the general excess stress tensor @xcite @xmath136 the affine shear elasticity @xmath26 is obtained using eq . ( [ eq_muadef ] ) and eq . ( [ eq_strain_frtwo ] ) . this yields @xmath137 with the first contribution @xmath28 being the so - called born - lam coefficient " @xcite @xmath138 it corresponds to the first term in eq . ( [ eq_strain_frtwo ] ) . the second contribution @xmath139 stands for the normal excess stress in the @xmath140-direction , i.e. the @xmath141 component of the excess stress tensor . [ [ isotropic - systems . ] ] isotropic systems . + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + in this work we focus on isotropic materials under isotropic external loads . the normal ( excess ) stresses @xmath142 for all directions @xmath123 are thus identical , i.e. @xmath143 with @xmath144 being the excess pressure , @xmath6 the total pressure , @xmath145 the ideal gas pressure and @xmath19 the spatial dimension . this implies that the affine shear elasticity is given by @xmath146 as already stated in the introduction , eq . ( [ eq_muamubpex ] ) . we note that for isotropic @xmath19-dimensional systems it can be shown @xcite that the born - lam coefficient can be simplified as @xmath147 the @xmath19-dependent prefactor stems from the assumed isotropy of the system and the mathematical formula @xcite @xmath148 ( @xmath149 being the kronecker symbol @xcite ) for the components of a unit vector in @xmath19 dimensions pointing into arbitrary directions . by comparing the excess pressure @xmath29 , eq . ( [ eq_sigaapex ] ) , with the underlined second contribution to the born coefficient in eq . ( [ eq_mub ] ) this implies that @xmath150 it is thus inconsistent to neglect the explicit excess pressure in eq . ( [ eq_muamubpex ] ) while keeping the second term of the born - lam coefficient @xmath28 . this approximation is only justified if the excess pressure @xmath29 is negligible ( and not the total pressure @xmath6 ) . [ [ different - ensembles . ] ] different ensembles . + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + being simple averages neither @xmath29 , @xmath26 or @xmath28 does depend for sufficiently large systems on the chosen ensemble , i.e. irrespective of whether @xmath3 or @xmath4 is imposed one expects to obtain the same values . as already reminded in sec . [ theo_strainfluctu ] , this is different for fluctuations in general @xcite . for instance , it is obviously pointless to use the shear - strain fluctuation formulae @xmath48 or @xmath151 in a constant-@xmath3 ensemble . a more interesting result is predicted if @xmath152 is computed in the wrong " constant-@xmath4 ensemble . since @xmath153 , eq . ( [ eq_muftransform ] ) , one actually expects to observe @xmath154 for all temperatures @xmath5 if our thermodynamic reasoning holds through the glass transition up to the liquid state . we will test numerically this non - trivial prediction in sec . [ sec_res ] . up to now we have only considered for simplicity of the presentation @xmath37- and @xmath49-ensembles at constant volume @xmath12 . since on general grounds pure deviatoric and dilatational ( volumetric ) strains are decoupled ( both strains commute ) , one expects the observable @xmath54 also to be applicable in the @xmath155-ensemble shown in fig . [ fig_sketch](d ) and the observables @xmath48 and @xmath151 to be applicable in the @xmath50-ensemble as sketched in fig . [ fig_sketch](e ) . in the latter ensemble one also expects to find @xmath156 and @xmath153 . this will also be tested below . [ [ direct - derivation - of - ensuremathmu_mathrmf - for - imposed - tau . ] ] direct derivation of @xmath55 for imposed @xmath4 . + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + we demonstrate now directly eq . ( [ eq_muamuftau ] ) for the shear stress fluctuations using the general mathematical identity @xmath157 with @xmath105 being an _ unconstrained _ coordinate , @xmath158 some property , @xmath159 a force " with respect to some energy " @xmath160 and the average being boltzmann weighted , i.e. @xmath161 . ( it is assumed in eq . ( [ eq_intbyparts ] ) that @xmath160 decays sufficiently fast at the boundaries . ) following work by zwanzig @xcite we express first the instantaneous shear stress @xmath30 given above by the kirkwood formula , eq . ( [ eq_tauhatkirkwood ] ) , by the alternative virial representation @xcite @xmath162 the second term , sometimes called the inner virial " , stands for a sum over all particles @xmath131 with @xmath163 being the @xmath140-coordinate of the particle and @xmath164 the @xmath105-coordinate of the force acting on the particle . this contribution indeed vanishes on average as can be seen using eq . ( [ eq_intbyparts ] ) , @xmath165 which shows that @xmath166 as it must . the stress fluctuations may thus be expressed as @xmath167 where we have used the integration by part , eq . ( [ eq_tauhatfluctu ] ) . this step requires that all particle positions are unconstrained and independent ( generalized ) coordinates . note that this is possible at imposed @xmath4 , but can not hold at fixed @xmath3 . assuming then pair interactions and using eq . ( [ eq_tauhatkirkwood ] ) one can reformulate eq . ( [ eq_stressfluctuvirial ] ) within a few lines . without further approximation this yields @xmath168 where the sum runs now over all interactions @xmath130 between particles @xmath133 . @xmath169 and @xmath170 refer to components of the distance vector of the interaction @xmath130 and @xmath171 to the @xmath105-component of the central force @xmath172 between a particle pair at a distance @xmath173 . note that in eq . ( [ eq_stressfluctdecoupled ] ) the stress fluctuations stemming from different interactions are decoupled , i.e. @xmath174 characterizes the self- or two - point contributions of directly interacting beads . since @xmath175 and , hence , @xmath176 this is identical to the affine shear elasticity @xmath26 derived at the end of sec . [ theo_stressfluctu ] . we have thus confirmed eq . ( [ eq_muamuftau ] ) . interestingly , the argument can be turned around : 1 . the stress fluctuation contribution term @xmath177 is obtained by the simple derivation given in this paragraph . 2 . using the general legendre transformation , eq . ( [ eq_muftransform ] ) , this implies @xmath178 for the @xmath37- and the @xmath155-ensemble . as already stressed , our thermodynamic derivation of eq . ( [ eq_gmodtt ] ) is rather general , not using in particular a well - defined displacement field for the particle positions . [ [ truncation . ] ] truncation . + + + + + + + + + + + it is common practice in computational condensed matter physics @xcite to truncate a pair interaction potential @xmath127 , with @xmath126 being the distance between two particles @xmath131 and @xmath132 , at a conveniently chosen cutoff @xmath179 . this allows to reduce the number of interactions to be computed and energy or force calculations become @xmath180-processes . however , the truncation also introduces technical difficulties , e.g. , instabilities in the numerical solution of differential equations as investigated especially for the md method @xcite . without restricting much in practice the generality of our results , we assume below that * the pair potential @xmath127 is short - ranged , i.e. that it decays within a few particle diameters , * it scales as @xmath181 with the reduced dimensionless distance @xmath182 where @xmath183 characterizes the length scale of the interaction @xmath130 and * the same reduced cutoff @xmath184 is set for all interactions @xmath130 . for instance , for monodisperse particles with constant diameter @xmath185 , as for the standard lennard - jones ( lj ) potential @xcite , @xmath186 the scaling variable becomes @xmath187 and the reduced cutoff @xmath188 . the effect of introducing @xmath189 is to replace @xmath190 by the truncated potential @xmath191 with @xmath192 being the heaviside function @xcite . even if eq . ( [ eq_utrunc ] ) is taken _ by definition _ as the new system hamiltonian , it is well known that impulsive corrections at the cutoff have to be taken into account in general for the excess pressure @xmath29 and other moments of the first derivatives of the potential @xcite . this is seen by considering the derivative of the truncated potential @xmath193 [ [ shifting - of - truncated - potential . ] ] shifting of truncated potential . + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + these corrections with respect to first derivatives can be avoided by considering a properly shifted potential @xcite @xmath194 since @xmath195 . with this choice _ no _ impulsive corrections arise for moments of the instantaneous shear stress @xmath30 and of other components of the excess stress tensor @xmath196 , eq . ( [ eq_sigab ] ) . specifically , if the potential is shifted , all impulsive corrections are avoided for the shear stress fluctuations @xmath55 , eq . ( [ eq_muf ] ) . [ [ correction - to - the - born - coefficient . ] ] correction to the born coefficient . + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + as shown in ref . @xcite , the standard shifting of a truncated potential is , however , insufficient in general for properties involving second ( and higher ) derivatives of the potential . this is particulary the case for the born coefficient @xmath28 , eq . ( [ eq_mub ] ) , which is required to compute the affine shear elasticity @xmath26 , eq . ( [ eq_muamubpex ] ) . the second derivative of the truncated and shifted potential being @xmath197 this implies that the born coefficient reads @xmath198 with @xmath199 being the bare born coefficient and @xmath200 the impulsive correction which needs to be taken into account . the latter correction may be readily computed numerically from the configuration ensemble using @xcite @xmath201 being a weighted radial pair distribution function which is related to the standard radial pair distribution function @xmath202 @xcite . [ [ mixtures - and - polydisperse - systems . ] ] mixtures and polydisperse systems . + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + below we shall consider model systems for mixtures and polydisperse systems where @xmath183 may differ for each interaction @xmath130 . for such mixed potentials @xmath190 , @xmath203 and @xmath204 and their derivatives take in principal an explicit index @xmath130 , i.e. one should write @xmath205 , @xmath206 , @xmath207 and so on . ( this is often not stated explicitly to keep a concise notation . ) for example one might wish to consider the generalization of the monodisperse lj potential , eq . ( [ eq_lj ] ) , to a mixture or polydisperse system with @xmath208 where @xmath209 and @xmath183 are fixed for each interaction @xmath130 . in practice , each particle @xmath131 may be characterized by an energy scale @xmath210 and a diameter " @xmath211 . the interaction parameters @xmath212 and @xmath213 are then given in terms of specified functions of these properties @xcite . the extensively studied kob - andersen ( ka ) model for binary mixtures of beads of type a and b @xcite , is a particular case of eq . ( [ eq_ljgeneralized ] ) with fixed interaction ranges @xmath214 , @xmath215 and @xmath216 and energy parameters @xmath217 , @xmath218 and @xmath219 characterizing , respectively , aa- , bb- and ab - contacts . the expression eq . ( [ eq_histolame ] ) remains valid for such explicitly @xmath130-dependent potentials . [ [ shear - modulus - and - compression - modulus . ] ] shear modulus and compression modulus . + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + since @xmath220 , eq . ( [ eq_histolame ] ) implies in turn @xmath221 with @xmath222 being the uncorrected bare shear modulus . as we shall see in sec . [ res_thigh ] , the correction @xmath200 is of importance for the _ precise _ determination of @xmath54 close to the glass transition where the shear modulus must vanish . an impulsive correction has also to be taken into account for the compression modulus @xmath223 computed from the normal pressure fluctuations in a constant volume ensemble as discussed in appendix [ app_k ] . using the symmetry of isotropic systems , eq . ( [ eq_etabmub ] ) , one verifies @xcite @xmath224 with @xmath225 being the uncorrected compression modulus . [ [ introduction.-1 ] ] introduction . + + + + + + + + + + + + + the computational data presented in this work have been obtained using two extremely well studied models of colloidal glass - formers which are described in detail elsewhere @xcite . we present first both models and the molecular dynamics ( md ) and monte carlo ( mc ) @xcite methods used to compute them in the different ensembles ( @xmath37 , @xmath49 , @xmath155 and @xmath50 ) compared in this study . we comment then on the quench protocol and locate the glass transition temperature @xmath9 for both models via dilatometry , as shown in fig . [ fig_quench_rho ] . this is needed as a prerequisite to our study of the elastic behavior in sec . [ sec_res ] . as sketched in fig . [ fig_sketch ] , periodic boundary conditions are applied in all spatial directions with @xmath226 for the linear dimensions of the @xmath19-dimensional simulation box . time scales are measured in units of the lj time @xmath227 @xcite for our md simulations ( @xmath228 being the particle mass , @xmath185 the reference length scale and @xmath229 the lj energy scale ) and in units of monte carlo steps ( mcs ) for our mc simulations . lj units are used throughout this work ( @xmath230 ) and boltzmann s constant @xmath16 is also set to unity . [ [ kob - andersen - model . ] ] kob - andersen model . + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + the kob - andersen ( ka ) model @xcite for binary mixtures of lj beads in @xmath1 dimensions has been investigated by means of md simulation @xcite taking advantage of the public domain lammps implementation @xcite . we use @xmath231 beads per simulation box and molar fractions @xmath232 and @xmath233 for both types of beads @xmath234 and @xmath235 . following ref . @xcite we set @xmath236 , @xmath237 and @xmath238 for the interaction range and @xmath239 , @xmath240 and @xmath241 for the lj energy scales . only data for the usual ( reduced ) cutoff @xmath242 are presented . for the @xmath155-ensemble we use the nos - hoover barostat provided by the lammps code ( fix npt command " ) @xcite which is used to impose a constant pressure @xmath243 for all temperatures . starting with an equilibrated configuration at @xmath244 well above the glass transition temperature @xmath245 ( as confirmed in the inset of fig . [ fig_quench_rho ] ) , the system is slowly quenched in the @xmath155-ensemble . the imposed mean temperature @xmath246 varies linearly as @xmath247 with @xmath248 being the constant quench rate . after a tempering time @xmath249 we compute over a sampling time @xmath250 various properties for the isobaric system at fixed temperature such as the moduli @xmath54 represented by the filled spheres in fig . [ fig_gt ] . fixing only then the volume ( @xmath37-ensemble ) the system is again tempered ( @xmath249 ) and various properties as the ones recorded in table [ tab_ka ] are computed using a sampling time @xmath250 . note that in the @xmath37-ensemble the equations of motion are integrated using a velocity verlet algorithm @xcite with a time step @xmath251 and systems are kept at the imposed temperature @xmath5 using a langevin thermostat @xcite with friction coefficient @xmath252 . by redoing for several temperatures around and below @xmath9 the tempering and the production runs we have checked that the presented results remain unchanged ( within numerical accuracy ) and that ageing effects are absolutely negligible . averages are taken over four independent configurations . as one may expect from the discussion in sec . [ theo_legendre ] , very similar results have been found for both ensembles for simple averages , for instance for the affine shear elasticity @xmath26 , and for the shear modulus @xmath54 , eq . ( [ eq_gmodtt ] ) . unfortunately , we are yet unable to present data for the ka model data at imposed shear stress @xmath4 ( @xmath49- , @xmath50-ensembles ) . .some properties for the ka model at normal pressure @xmath243 and shear stress @xmath41 : the mean density @xmath253 , the mean energy per volume @xmath254 , the impulsive correction term @xmath200 ( sec . [ theo_trunc ] ) , the ( corrected ) born - lam coefficient @xmath28 , the affine shear elasticity @xmath255 , the shear modulus @xmath54 obtained in the @xmath37-ensemble , the hypervirial @xmath256 and the affine dilatation elasticity @xmath257 discussed in appendix [ app_k ] and the compression modulus @xmath258 obtained for the @xmath37-ensemble . the affine elasticities @xmath26 and @xmath259 are the natural scales for , respectively , the shear modulus @xmath0 and the compression modulus @xmath20 . [ tab_ka ] [ cols="^,^,^,^,^,^,^,^,^,^,^,^",options="header " , ] [ [ local - mc - moves - for - the - plj - model . ] ] local mc moves for the plj model . + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + for all ensembles considered here local mc moves are used ( albeit not exclusively ) where a particle is chosen randomly and a displacement @xmath260 , uniformly distributed over a disk of radius @xmath261 , from the current position @xmath262 of the particle is attempted . the corresponding energy change @xmath263 is calculated and the move is accepted using the standard metropolis criterion @xcite . the maxium displacement distance @xmath261 is chosen such that the acceptance rate @xmath234 remains reasonable , i.e. @xmath264 @xcite . as may be seen from the inset in fig . [ fig_quench_e_plj ] where the acceptance rate @xmath265 is shown as a function of temperature @xmath5 , we find that temperatures below @xmath266 are best sampled using @xmath267 , whereas @xmath268 is a good choice for the interesting temperature regime between @xmath269 and @xmath270 around the glass transition temperature @xmath271 . ( see the main panel of fig . [ fig_quench_rho ] for the determination of @xmath9 . ) various data sets are presented in sec . [ sec_res ] for a fixed value @xmath272 which allows a reasonable comparison of the sampling time dependence for temperatures around the glass transition . this value is not necessarily the best choice for tempering the system and for computing static equilibrium properties at the given temperature , especially below @xmath273 . [ [ collective - plane - wave - mc - moves . ] ] collective plane - wave mc moves . + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + local mc jumps in the @xmath37-ensemble become obviously inefficient for relaxing large scale structural properties @xcite for the lowest temperatures computed for the plj model ( @xmath274 ) as may be seen , e.g. , from the finite , albeit very small shear stresses @xmath4 which happen to occur naturally in some of the quenched configurations ( especially if the quench rate @xmath275 is too large ) and can only with difficulty be relaxed using local jumps _ alone _ @xcite . we have thus crosschecked and improved the values obtained using only local mc moves by adding global mc move attempts for all particles with longitudinal and ( more importantly ) transverse plane waves commensurate with the simulation box . the random amplitudes and phases of the waves are assumed to be uniformly distributed . note that the maximum amplitude @xmath276 of each wave is chosen inversely proportional to the length @xmath277 of the wavevector in agreement with continuum theory . this allows to keep the same acceptance rate for each global mode if @xmath278 . as one expects , the plane - wave displacement attempts becomes inappropriate for large @xmath279 where continuum elasticity breaks down @xcite and , hence , the acceptance rate @xmath280 gets too large to be efficient @xcite . note that the maximum amplitude @xmath276 has to be chosen much smaller for the longitudinal waves as for the transverse ones , i.e. since the systems are essentially incompressible , the transverse modes naturally are more effective for quenching and equilibrating the systems . these global plane - wave moves have been added for the tempering of all presented configurations below @xmath270 with @xmath281 and for production runs over sampling times @xmath282 for static properties for @xmath283 . details concerning the collective plane - wave mc moves must be given elsewhere . [ [ mc - sampling - of - different - ensembles . ] ] mc sampling of different ensembles . + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + in this paper we shall be concerned more with the consequences of affine displacements associated with collective mc moves changing the overall box volume @xmath12 and shear strain @xmath3 . using again a metropolis criterion for accepting a suggested change of @xmath12 or @xmath3 , these pure dilatational and pure shear strain fluctuations are used to impose a mean normal pressure @xmath284 and a mean shear stress @xmath41 . for a shear strain altering mc move one first chooses randomly a strain fluctuation @xmath285 with @xmath286 . assuming an imposed shear stress @xmath4 the suggested @xmath285 is accepted if @xmath287 with @xmath288 being a uniformly distributed random variable with @xmath289 . the energy change @xmath263 associated with the affine strain may be calculated using eq . ( [ eq_strain_r ] ) . since @xmath290 is supposed in this study , the last term in the exponential drops out . ( as noted in sec . [ theo_stressfluctu ] , the volume remains unchanged in a pure shear strain and , hence , no translational entropy contribution appears . ) the maximum shear strain step @xmath291 is fixed such that at the given temperature the acceptance rate remains reasonable @xcite . as described in more detail in ref . @xcite , one similarly chooses a relative volume change @xmath292 with @xmath12 being the current volume @xcite . the volume altering move is accepted at an imposed pressure @xmath6 if @xmath293 where @xmath263 may be computed using eq . ( [ eq_strain_r_epsilon ] ) . the logarithmic contribution corresponds to the change of the translational entropy . using eq . ( [ eq_timposed ] ) after each mcs for local mc moves ( and global plane - wave mc moves if these are added ) realizes the @xmath49-ensemble shown in fig . [ fig_sketch](c ) , using eq . ( [ eq_pimposed ] ) the @xmath155-ensemble shown in fig . [ fig_sketch](d ) and using in turn both strain fluctuations the @xmath50-ensemble in fig . [ fig_sketch](e ) . we remind that @xmath37- and @xmath155-ensembles are used to determine @xmath54 and @xmath49- and @xmath50-ensembles to obtain @xmath48 and @xmath151 . as shown in fig . [ fig_quench_rho ] , we quench the configurations starting from @xmath294 in the @xmath155- and the @xmath50-ensemble using a constant quench rate @xmath275 . note that the smallest quench rate @xmath295 for one configuration in the @xmath155-shown did require alone a run over six months using one core of an intel xeon e5410 processor . interestingly , similar results are obtained with the @xmath50-ensemble only using a rate @xmath296 . ( due to the additional computation for the shear strain fluctuations this is , however , only a factor five faster . ) the configurations created by the @xmath155-quenches are used ( after tempering ) for the sampling in the @xmath37- and @xmath155-ensembles , the configurations obtained by the @xmath50-quenches for the sampling in the @xmath49- and @xmath50-ensembles . only two independent configurations have been sampled following the full protocol for each temperature and each of the four ensembles . instead of increasing further the number of configurations ( which will be done in the future ) we have focused in the present preliminary study on long tempering times and production runs over @xmath282 mcs which have been redone several times for a few temperatures ( summing up to total runs of @xmath297 mcs for @xmath269 and @xmath298 ) to check for equilibration problems and to verify that ageing effects can be ignored . we firmly believe that the breaking of the time translational invariance is not a relevant issue for the strong sampling time dependence reported below for the shear moduli . [ [ algo_sample ] ] glass transition temperature . + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + the inset of fig . [ fig_quench_rho ] presents for the ka model how the glass transition temperature @xmath9 may be obtained using standard dilatometry where the rescaled density @xmath299 is traced as a function of temperature @xmath5 as in ref . @xcite for a similar polymer glass problem . this reveals a linear low-@xmath5 ( solid line ) and a linear high-@xmath5 regime . the intercept of both lines confirms the well - known value @xmath300 from the literature @xcite . the main panel presents the unscaled number density @xmath253 for plj systems at constant normal pressure @xmath284 as a function of temperature @xmath5 for different quench rates @xmath275 in mcs . only local mc moves with a fixed maximum particle displacement @xmath301 for all temperatures @xmath5 are used for the examples given . the crosses refer to a quench in the @xmath50-ensemble where the box shape is allowed to fluctuate at @xmath41 . all other data refer to the @xmath155-ensemble with @xmath36 . the solid line and the dashed line are linear fits to the best density estimates indicated by the stars obtained for , respectively , low and high temperatures . by matching both lines one determines @xmath302 . a similar value is given if @xmath299 is plotted as a function of @xmath5 . the main panel of fig . [ fig_quench_e_plj ] shows the interaction energy per particle @xmath303 of the plj model as a function of temperature for the same quench protocols as in fig . [ fig_quench_rho ] . the solid line and the dashed line are linear fits to the energy for , respectively , low and high temperatures . this confirms @xmath302 for the plj model @xcite . we begin our discussion by focusing on the high temperature liquid limit where all reasonable operational definitions of the shear modulus @xmath0 must vanish . the results presented in fig . [ fig_gt_thigh ] have been obtained for the plj model at mean pressure @xmath284 , mean shear stress @xmath304 and mean temperature @xmath305 , i.e. far above the glass transition temperature @xmath302 . only local mc monomer displacements with a maximum jump displacement @xmath272 are reported here . instantaneous properties relevant for the moments are written down every @xmath306 mcs and averaged using standard gliding averages @xcite , i.e. we compute mean values and fluctuations for a given time interval @xmath307 $ ] and average over all possible intervals of length @xmath32 . the horizontal axis indicates the latter interval length @xmath32 in units of mcs . the vertical axis is made dimensionless by rescaling the moduli with the ( corrected ) affine shear elasticity @xmath308 from table [ tab_plj ] . ( being a simple average , @xmath26 is found to be identical for all computed ensembles . ) in agreement with eq . ( [ eq_gbound ] ) , the ratio @xmath309 for all operational definitions drops rapidly below unity . the dashed line indicates the asymptotic power - law slope @xmath310 @xcite . this can be understood by noting that at imposed @xmath4 the shear strain freely diffuses in the liquid limit , i.e. @xmath311 , which implies that @xmath312 . for both @xmath49- and @xmath50-ensembles we compare our key definition @xmath48 , eq . ( [ eq_gmodgt ] ) , to the observable @xmath151 , eq . ( [ eq_gmodgg ] ) . in both cases we confirm @xmath313 for larger times as suggested by the thermodynamic relation eq . ( [ eq_dgamdtau ] ) which has been directly checked @xcite . we have also computed the dimensionless correlation coefficient @xmath314 , eq . ( [ eq_cmodgt ] ) , which characterize the correlation of the measured instantaneous shear strains @xmath46 and shear stresses @xmath30 . as indicated for the @xmath50-ensemble ( stars ) , @xmath90 vanishes rapidly with @xmath32 , i.e. @xmath46 and @xmath30 are decorrelated . the dash - dotted line indicates the power - law exponent @xmath315 expected from eq . ( [ eq_cmodgt_mua ] ) and @xmath316 . note that by plotting @xmath314 _ vs. _ @xmath317 , eq . ( [ eq_cmodgt_mua ] ) has been directly verified for both @xmath49- and @xmath50-ensembles ( not shown ) . the stress fluctuation formula , eq . ( [ eq_gmodtt ] ) , is represented in fig . [ fig_gt_thigh ] by squares and diamonds for , respectively , @xmath37- and @xmath155-ensembles . the bare shear modulus @xmath222 _ without _ the impulsive correction @xmath200 for the born coefficient @xmath28 discussed in sec . [ theo_trunc ] is given by small filled symbols . the impulsive correction @xmath318 ( table [ tab_plj ] ) computed independently from the weighted radial pair correlation function , eq . ( [ eq_histolame ] ) , is shown by a horizontal line . the corrected moduli @xmath319 vanish indeed as expected . see ref . @xcite for a systematic numerical characterization of @xmath200 as a function of the reduced cutoff @xmath189 . as may also be seen there , a truncation correction is also necessary for the ka model . the @xmath200 for different temperatures may be found in table [ tab_ka ] for the ka model and in table [ tab_plj ] for the plj model . we assume from now on that the impulsive corrections are properly taken into account without stating this technical point explicitly . [ [ introduction.-2 ] ] introduction . + + + + + + + + + + + + + we turn now to the opposite low-@xmath5 limit focusing specifically on the plj model at @xmath320 . obviously , such deeply quenched colloidal glasses must behave as amorphous solids with a constant shear modulus for large times ( albeit not infinite times ) as sketched in fig . [ fig_sketch](b ) by the top curve . before presenting in sec . [ res_tlow ] the elastic properties of these glasses , we discuss first conceptually simpler substitute systems formed by _ permanent _ spring networks . we do this for illustration purposes since questions related to ergodicity and ageing are by construction irrelevant and the thermodynamical relations reminded in sec . [ sec_theo ] should hold rigorously . [ [ network - hamiltonian . ] ] network hamiltonian . + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + assuming ideal harmonic springs the interaction energy reads @xmath321 with @xmath322 being the spring constant and @xmath323 the reference length of spring @xmath130 . the sum runs over all springs @xmath130 between topologically connected vertices @xmath131 and @xmath132 of the network . we assume here a strongly and homogeneously connected network where every vertex @xmath131 is in contact with many neighbors @xmath132 . such a network may be constructed from a plj configuration at @xmath320 keeping the particle positions for the positions of the vertices and replacing each lj interaction @xmath130 by a spring of spring constant @xmath322 and reference length @xmath323 . the simplest choice we have investigated is to set @xmath324 and @xmath325 which corresponds to a well - defined ground state of energy @xmath326 and pressure @xmath327 at @xmath328 ( not shown ) . we discuss here instead a slightly more realistic choice of @xmath322 and @xmath323 which corresponds to the _ same _ dynamical matrix " as the plj configuration at @xmath329 and @xmath284 , i.e. the same second derivative of the total interaction potential with respect to the particle positions @xcite . this choice imposes the setting @xmath330 with @xmath331 being the interaction potential for reduced distances @xmath332 . ( impulsive corrections at @xmath333 are neglected here . ) [ [ sampling . ] ] sampling . + + + + + + + + + taking advantage of the fact that all interacting vertices are known , these networks can be computed using global mc moves with longitudinal and transverse planar waves as described in sec . [ sec_algo ] . no local mc jumps for individual vertices have been added . note that although some @xmath322 and @xmath323 may even be negative , this does not affect the global or local stability of the network . presumably due to the fact that our spring constants are rather large , we have not observed either any buckling instability if volume fluctuations are allowed . for networks at the same pressure @xmath6 , shear stress @xmath4 and temperature @xmath5 as the original plj configuration , we obtain , not surprisingly , the same affine shear elasticity @xmath334 as for the reference . the same applies for other simple averages . [ [ shear - modulus . ] ] shear modulus . + + + + + + + + + + + + + + figure [ fig_gt_dynmat ] presents various measurements of the shear modulus @xmath0 for different ensembles as a function of sampling time @xmath32 . as in sec . [ res_thigh ] , we use gliding averages and the vertical axis has been rescaled by the affine shear elasticity @xmath26 . as can be seen , we obtain in the long - time limit @xmath335 ( bold line ) irrespective of whether the shear modulus is determined from @xmath48 or @xmath151 in the @xmath49- or @xmath50-ensembles or using @xmath54 in the @xmath37- or @xmath155-ensembles at fixed shear strain @xmath3 . note that even in these cases the shear modulus decreases first with time albeit the network is perfectly at thermodynamic equilibrium and no ageing occurs by construction . as shown by the dash - dotted line , @xmath336 for short times , i.e. in this limit the response is affine . as indicated by the stars , we have also computed the correlation coefficient @xmath314 as a function of time . from @xmath92 for small @xmath32 , it decreases somewhat becoming @xmath337 for large times in agreement with eq . ( [ eq_cmodgt_mua ] ) . if @xmath54 is computed in the wrong " @xmath49- or @xmath50-ensembles , it is seen to vanish rapidly with time as shown by the filled squares . this decay is of course expected from eq . ( [ eq_muamuftau ] ) as discussed in sec . [ theo_stressfluctu ] and sec . [ theo_legendre ] . [ [ shear - stress - fluctuations . ] ] shear - stress fluctuations . + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + to emphasize the latter point we show in fig . [ fig_muft_dynmat ] the stress fluctuations @xmath338 for different ensembles . this is also done to have a closer look at the time dependence of various contributions to @xmath339 . as before , the vertical axis has been rescaled with @xmath340 . we also indicate the rescaled values of @xmath341 ( thin top line ) and @xmath342 ( dash - dotted line ) computed by a gliding average over time intervals @xmath307 $ ] . being simple averages both properties do not depend on the ensemble probed ( not shown ) and become virtually immediately @xmath32-independent as can be seen from the indicated horizontal lines . this is quite different for the different shear stress fluctuations @xmath55 presented which increase monotonously from @xmath343 for short times to their plateau value for long times . in agreement with eq . ( [ eq_muamuftau ] ) we find that @xmath344 for @xmath49- and @xmath50-ensembles and as predicted by eq . ( [ eq_muftransform ] ) we confirm @xmath345 for @xmath37- and @xmath155-ensembles . the asymptotic limit is reached after about @xmath346 mcs in the first case for imposed @xmath4 , but only after @xmath347 for imposed @xmath3 . this is due to the fact that @xmath174 corresponds to the fluctuations of the self - contribution of individual springs as discussed in sec . [ theo_legendre ] , while @xmath348 also contains contributions from stress correlations of different springs . it should be rewarding to analyze in the future finite system - size effects and the time dependence of three - dimensional ( 3d ) systems using the dynamical matrix associated to the ka model in the @xmath329 limit . we return now to the colloidal glasses where the topology of the interactions is , of course , _ not _ permanently fixed ( at least not at finite temperatures ) and the shear stresses may thus fluctuate more strongly . as an example , we present in fig . [ fig_gt_tlow ] the shear modulus @xmath349 as a function of sampling time @xmath32 for plj beads at mean pressure @xmath284 , mean shear stress @xmath350 and mean temperature @xmath320 , i.e. the same conditions as in the previous subsection . all simple averages , such as the affine shear elasticity @xmath351 , are the same for all ensembles albeit different quench protocols have been used . for all examples given we use local mc jumps with @xmath301 which allows to keep a small , but still reasonable acceptance rate @xmath352 . we have also performed runs with additional global mc moves using longitudinal and transverse plane waves . this yields similar data which is shifted horizontally to the left ( not shown ) . as one would expect , the shear moduli presented in fig . [ fig_gt_tlow ] are similar to the ones shown in fig . [ fig_gt_dynmat ] for the permanent spring network . the filled triangles show @xmath54 computed in the wrong " @xmath50-ensemble . as expected from eq . ( [ eq_muftransform ] ) these values vanish rapidly with time . if on the other hand @xmath48 , @xmath151 and @xmath54 are computed in their natural ensembles , all these measures of @xmath0 are similar and approach , as one expects for such a low temperature , the same finite asymptotic value @xmath353 indicated by the bold horizontal line . the stars indicate the squared correlation coefficient @xmath354 which is seen to collapse perfectly on the rescaled modulus @xmath317 which shows that eq . ( [ eq_cmodgt_mua ] ) even holds for small times before the thermodynamic plateau has been reached . similar reduced shear moduli @xmath355 have been also obtained for the ka model in the low-@xmath5 limit as may be seen from table [ tab_ka ] . these results confirm that about half of the affine shear elasticity is released by the shear stress fluctuations in agreement with refs . interestingly , this value is slightly smaller as the corresponding value for the permanent dynamical matrix model presented above . since some , albeit very small , rearrangement of the interactions must occur for the plj particles at finite temperature , this is a reasonable finding . the rescaled shear stress fluctuations @xmath356 for the same ensembles are presented in fig . [ fig_muft_tlow ] . while the two - point correlations @xmath357 ( thin horizontal line ) and @xmath358 ( dash - dotted horizontal line ) do not dependent on time , one observes again that @xmath356 increases monotonously from zero to its long - time asymptotic plateau value . in agreement with eq . ( [ eq_muamuftau ] ) we find @xmath344 for the @xmath49 and the @xmath50 ensembles , while @xmath345 ( dashed horizontal line ) for the @xmath37 and the @xmath155 ensembles . ( similar behavior has been obtained for the ka model in the @xmath37-ensemble for temperatures @xmath274 . ) as may be better seen for the data set obtained for @xmath359 using the @xmath37-ensemble ( small filled squares ) where @xmath360 , the stress fluctuations @xmath361 do not rigorously become constant , but increase extremely slowly on the logarithmic time scales presented . there is , hence , even at low temperatures always some sampling time dependence if the interactions are not permanently fixed as for the topologically fixed networks discussed above . however , this effect becomes only sizeable above @xmath269 for the ka model and above @xmath266 for the plj model . we shall now attempt to characterize this temperature dependence . [ [ stress - fluctuations . ] ] stress fluctuations . + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + we turn now to the characterization of the temperature dependence of the shear modulus @xmath0 and various related properties . we focus first on the best values obtained for the longest simulation runs available . figure [ fig_muamuf_t ] presents the stress fluctuations obtained for the ka model using the @xmath37-ensemble ( open spheres ) and for the plj model using @xmath37- and the @xmath50-ensembles . the affine shear elasticity @xmath26 obtained for each system is represented by small filled symbols . as shown for both models by a bold solid line for the low-@xmath5 and by a dashed line for the high-@xmath5 regime , @xmath8 decays roughly linearly with @xmath5 . interestingly , the slopes match precisely at @xmath362 for both models . as may be seen from the large triangles for the @xmath50-ensemble , we confirm for all temperatures that @xmath363 as expected from eq . ( [ eq_muamuftau ] ) . for systems without box shape fluctuations , it is seen that @xmath364 becomes _ non - monotonous _ with a clear maximum at @xmath365 . in the liquid regime for @xmath366 where the boundary conditions do not matter , we obtain @xmath367 , i.e. all shear stress fluctuations decay with temperature . below @xmath9 the boundary constraint ( @xmath36 ) becomes more and more relevant with decreasing @xmath5 which reduces the shear stress fluctuations . according to eq . ( [ eq_muftransform ] ) , @xmath364 must thus decrease with increasing @xmath0 as the system is further cooled down . that @xmath364 must necessarily be non - monotonous with a maximum at @xmath9 is one of the central results of the presented work . [ [ shear - modulus - as - a - function - of - temperature . ] ] shear modulus as a function of temperature . + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + the temperature dependence of the ( unscaled ) shear moduli @xmath35 is presented in fig . [ fig_gt ] . data obtained by md simulation of the ka model ( @xmath368 , @xmath300 ) are indicated for the @xmath37-ensemble ( open spheres ) and the @xmath155-ensemble ( filled spheres ) . all other results refer to the best values obtained by mc simulations of the plj model ( @xmath284 , @xmath302 ) using both local and global moves and different ensembles as indicated . for the plj model the values @xmath54 obtained in the @xmath37 ensemble ( squares ) are seen to be essentially identical for all @xmath5 to the moduli @xmath48 ( crosses ) and @xmath151 ( triangles ) obtained in ensembles with strain fluctuations . as shown by the small filled triangles , @xmath54 vanishes in the @xmath50 ensemble for all @xmath5 in agreement with eq . ( [ eq_muamuftau ] ) . ( we remind that the impulsive correction @xmath200 has to be taken into account if @xmath54 is used . ) decreasing the temperature further below @xmath9 the shear moduli are seen to increase rapidly for both models . as shown by the solid and the dashed lines both models are well fitted by a cusp - singularity @xmath369 with fit constants @xmath370 for the ka model and @xmath371 for the plj model where we have set in both cases @xmath372 . confirming the md simulations by barrat _ @xcite , this suggests that the transition is very sharp , albeit _ continuous _ in qualitative agreement with the predictions from ref . @xcite . if we fit the data close to @xmath9 with an additional off - set @xmath373 , a slightly _ negative _ value is obtained which is not compatible with mct @xcite . however , admittedly both the number of data points close to @xmath9 and their precision ( due to the small number of independent configurations ) are yet not sufficient to rule out completely a positive , albeit ( presumably ) small off - set . a slightly different representation of the data is given in fig . [ fig_gt_rescal ] where the reduced shear modulus @xmath374 is plotted as a function of the reduced temperature @xmath375 for both models . using the independently determined glass transition temperature @xmath9 and affine shear elasticity @xmath8 as scales to make the axes dimensionless , the rescaled data are found to collapse ! this is of course a remarkable and rather unexpected result considering that two different models in two different dimensions have been compared . the bold line indicates the cusp - singularity @xmath376 with a prefactor which is compatible to the ones used in eq . ( [ eq_cuspcont ] ) considering the typical values of @xmath8 in both models . whether this striking collapse is just due to some lucky coincidence or makes manifest a more general universal scaling is impossible to decide at present . ( please note that the corresponding data for the compression modulus shown in fig . [ fig_kt ] does not scale . ) no rescaling of the vertical axis is necessary for the squared correlation coefficient @xmath377 shown in the inset for two different ensembles of the plj model . the same continuous cusp - like decay ( bold line ) is found as for the modulus @xmath0 . this is again consistent with the thermodynamic reasoning put forward at the end of sec . [ theo_strainfluctu ] , eq . ( [ eq_cmodgt_mua ] ) . [ [ sampling - time - dependence . ] ] sampling time dependence . + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + a word of caution must be placed here . the results presented in figs . [ fig_muamuf_t]-[fig_gt_rescal ] correspond to the longest simulation runs we have at present been able to perform . obviously , this does _ not _ mean that they correspond to the limit for asymptotically long sampling times , if the latter limit exists , or at least an intermediate plateau of respectable period of time . focusing on the plj model in the @xmath50-ensemble we attempt in fig . [ fig_gt_t ] to give a tentative characterization of the sampling time dependence . we plot @xmath378 as a function of @xmath32 for different temperatures as indicated . to make the data comparable all simulations for @xmath379 have been performed with local mc jumps of same maximum distance @xmath272 . as we have already seen in fig . [ fig_gt_thigh ] , the shear modulus decays inversely with time in the liquid regime at high temperatures . this limit is indicated by the thin line . with decreasing @xmath5 the ( unscaled ) shear modulus increases and a shoulder develops . note that even for @xmath298 , i.e. slightly below the glass transition temperature @xmath380 estimated via dilatometry ( fig . [ fig_quench_rho ] ) , @xmath378 decays strongly with time . a more or less @xmath32-independent shoulder ( on the logarithmic scales used ) can only be seen below @xmath273 . we emphasize that we present here a sampling time effect expressing the fact that the configuration space is more and more explored with increasing @xmath32 and _ not _ a time correlation function @xcite . please note also that this time dependence has nothing to do with equilibration problems or ageing effects . time translational invariance is perfectly obeyed in our simulations as we have checked by rerunning the sampling _ after _ additional tempering over at least @xmath347 mcs for all temperatures . similar @xmath32-dependencies for different temperatures @xmath5 have also been observed for @xmath378 and @xmath339 for the plj model and for @xmath339 for the ka model ( not shown ) . a different representation of the data for both models is shown in fig . [ fig_gt_t ] where the reduced shear modulus @xmath381 is plotted against the reduced temperature @xmath382 for different sampling times @xmath32 as indicated . similar behavior is found for both models . the shear modulus decreases with @xmath32 and this the more the larger the temperature @xmath5 . for smaller temperatures the different data sets appear to approach more readily as one expects from the @xmath32-independent shoulder for the plj model in fig . [ fig_gt_t ] . as a consequence the glass transition is seen to become sharper with increasing @xmath32 . the data approach the continuous cusp - singularity indicated by the bold line . however , it is not clear from the current data if the data converge to an at least _ intermediately _ stable behavior . longer simulation runs are clearly necessary for both models to clarify this issue . similar data have also been obtained for the plj model from the independent determination of @xmath378 and @xmath383 in the @xmath49-ensemble and for @xmath339 in the @xmath37- and @xmath155-ensemble . the stress fluctuation formalism is a powerful method for computing elastic moduli for canonical ensembles using simulation boxes of constant volume and shape @xcite . focusing on the shear modulus @xmath0 of two well - known glass - forming colloidal model systems in @xmath1 and @xmath2 dimensions , which we have sampled by means of md and mc simulations , we have addressed the general question of whether the stress fluctuation method may be used through a solid - liquid transition where a well - defined displacement field ceases to be defined . deliberately setting the experimentally motivated linear regression eq . ( [ eq_gmodgt ] ) as the fundamental definition , the shear modulus @xmath0 has been computed from the strain and stress fluctuations ( assuming a fixed finite measurement time window @xmath384 ) in ensembles where either a shear strain @xmath36 ( @xmath37- and @xmath155-ensembles ) or a ( mean ) shear stress @xmath41 ( @xmath49- and @xmath50-ensembles ) have been imposed ( fig . [ fig_sketch ] ) . working at constant mean normal pressure we have computed and compared the temperature dependence for various simple averages and fluctuations contributing to the shear modulus in different ensembles . for the ka model only the currently available results for @xmath37- and @xmath155-ensembles have been presented . as has been stressed in sec . [ theo_stressfluctu ] and sec . [ theo_legendre ] , the stress fluctuation representation @xmath54 at fixed shear strain does not rely _ in principle _ on a solid - like reference state for a displacement field of tagged particles if thermodynamics can be assumed to hold . it thus holds formally through the glass - transition temperature @xmath9 up to the liquid regime ( albeit with a trivial value @xmath34 ) as does the better known relation for the compression modulus @xmath20 ( appendix [ app_k ] ) @xcite . as emphasized in sec . [ theo_trunc ] , impulsive corrections due to the truncation of the pair potentials have to be properly taken into account , especially at high temperatures ( fig . [ fig_gt_thigh ] ) , for the precise determination of the affine shear elasticity @xmath255 @xcite . confirming eq . ( [ eq_gmods ] ) , it has been shown for the plj model that @xmath54 at @xmath36 has the _ same _ long - time behavior as the conceptually more direct observables @xmath48 and @xmath151 obtained using the strain fluctuations at constant mean shear stress @xmath41 . the standard thermodynamic relations comparing different ensembles appear thus to hold also _ in practice _ ( at least within our numerical precision ) through the glass transition for all @xmath5 and this albeit 1 . some degrees of freedom get quenched at low temperatures on the time window @xmath384 computationally accessible , 2 . all operational definitions of @xmath0 are transient in the sense that they vanish for @xmath385 ( figs . [ fig_gt_t ] and [ fig_gt_t ] ) and 3 . it is not self - evident that in the latter limit and for large temperatures @xmath3 and @xmath4 can still be treated as a pair of conjugated thermostatistical variables . the latter point compactly epitomized by the thermodynamic relation eq . ( [ eq_dgamdtau ] ) has been shown to hold , however , with remarkable precision up to very high temperatures for the plj model . as predicted by general legendre transformation , @xmath54 vanishes for all temperatures @xmath5 , if @xmath4 rather than @xmath3 is imposed ( figs . [ fig_gt_dynmat ] , [ fig_gt_tlow ] and [ fig_gt ] ) . the shear - stress fluctuations @xmath174 are thus given by the affine response under an external load @xmath26 ( fig . [ fig_muamuf_t ] ) , i.e. @xmath174 reduces to a simple two - point pair correlation function if pair potentials are considered as discussed in sec . [ theo_legendre ] . the same holds above @xmath9 for constant @xmath3 , since the boundary conditions are irrelevant for the liquid state . this symmetry with respect to the boundary conditions ( @xmath386 ) is broken at the glass transition for a large , but finite @xmath384 : at constant @xmath3 the stress fluctuations reveal a strong non - monotonous behavior with a clear maximum at @xmath9 ( fig . [ fig_muamuf_t ] ) . the shear modulus is the order parameter characterizing this symmetry breaking . alternatively , as we have discussed in sec . [ theo_legendre ] , @xmath387 may be seen as an order parameter comparing the ratio of the non - affine to the affine shear responses . since @xmath388 for @xmath389 , this implies that the stress fluctuations contain higher - order correlations _ reducing _ the free energy of the system . the increase of @xmath0 below @xmath9 is reasonably fitted for both models by a _ continuous _ cusp singularity , eq . ( [ eq_cuspcont ] ) , in qualitative agreement with recent replica calculations @xcite . a jump discontinuity , as suggested by mode - coupling theory @xcite and another replica theory @xcite , is not compatible with the currently available data shown in fig . [ fig_gt ] and fig . [ fig_gt_rescal ] . however , as shown in fig . [ fig_gt_t ] and fig . [ fig_gt_t ] , our data depend strongly on sampling time @xmath32 and the computation of larger @xmath32 could lead to a sharper transition . thus a jump discontinuity can not be ruled out completely . ( we are not aware of any other investigation of the sampling time effect for the shear modulus . ) at present we believe , however , that it would be surprising if our data could be reconciled with a discontinuity at @xmath9 . it seems more likely that below @xmath9 , where the choice of the boundary conditions does matter as shown , the definition of the glassy shear modulus used in refs . @xcite do not correspond to the key operational definition @xmath48 of the shear modulus considered by us . in any case , our work shows that any theory and numerical scheme used to determine the shear modulus using a stress or strain fluctuation relation ( in the low - wavevector limit or at a small finite @xmath279 ) must cleary specify and take into account whether the shear stress or the shear strain are macroscopically imposed . otherwise , such an approach is void . [ [ beyond - the - presented - work . ] ] beyond the presented work . + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + future work should clearly focus on the more detailed description of the sampling time dependence . by extrapolating appropriately for the large-@xmath32 asymptotic behavior , this may allow to settle the theoretical debate . as emphasized above , one shortcoming of the present work is that the time - scale used in our mc simulations was slightly arbitrary , especially if additional non - local particle moves are used in the low-@xmath5 limit and if box volume and shape changing strains are included . the comparison of @xmath32-dependent properties for different temperatures @xmath5 becomes thus delicate . our mc study for the 2d soft particles should thus in any case be recomputed with langevin thermostat md dynamics as used for the data of the ka model presented . the @xmath32-dependence of the latter model , which is a better glass former than the 2d plj model @xcite , has still to be worked out for the key operational definition @xmath48 in the @xmath49- or @xmath50-ensembles @xcite . we plan also in the near future to reconsider more carefully our previous investigation of the glass transition of polymer melts @xcite taking properly into account the impulsive truncation corrections and comparing the shear moduli @xmath390 ( @xmath50-ensemble ) and @xmath54 ( @xmath50-ensemble ) around @xmath9 . in addition , it should be rewarding to compare our shear moduli with the values obtained from the displacement of particles following the procedure chosen in ref . this procedure relies on the idea that the particles fluctuate around a well - defined reference position . in the low-@xmath5 limit where the interaction network can be replaced by the dynamical matrix , this should yield the same results . however , for larger temperatures where the harmonic approximation must break down , this approach is questionable ( both for the analysis of experimental and computational data ) and should be compared to the moduli obtained directly from the strain and stress fluctuations of the overall simulation box . [ [ a - simple - scalar - model . ] ] a simple scalar model . + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + we are currently working on an extremely simplified scalar model for permanent and transient networks in @xmath2 dimensions which may help to clarify the theoretical debate @xcite . as sketched in the panel ( a ) of fig . [ fig_band ] , in this model beads ( filled spheres ) are glued on rigid rods which are only allowed to move horizontally . in its most simple implementation this is done by means of global mc moves using transverse plane waves with a wavevector pointing in the @xmath140-direction . the glued beads are connected by ideal harmonic springs where the spring constants @xmath322 and reference lengths @xmath323 are chosen randomly according to fixed , narrow or broad distributions . the stiffness of the contacts between rods may differ ( even including negative @xmath322 and @xmath323 as for the dynamical matrix studied in sec . [ res_dynmat ] ) . the shear modulus may be computed either from the shear strain fluctuations in the @xmath49- or the shear stress fluctuations in the @xmath37-ensemble . the shear stresses can be relaxed by either allowing the particles to move along the rods using longitudinal plane waves in the @xmath105-direction and/or by breaking and reconnection of springs . the latter step is currently done by applying a chemical potential for the springs . physically , the study of such transient networks is motivated by systems of hyperbranched polymer chains with sticky end - groups @xcite or telechelic polymers in water - oil emulsions @xcite . the associated relaxation frequency @xmath391 for a given spring @xmath130 is assumed to be set by an activation barrier @xmath392 which may differ for each spring . depending on the distribution of this activation barrier the shear modulus @xmath349 thus decays more or less rapidly with sampling time @xmath32 as sketched in panel ( b ) of fig . [ fig_band ] . the shear modulus becomes constant , if the random percolating network is permanent ( @xmath393 , @xmath394 ) or the relaxation negligible ( top solid line ) . the system behaves as a liquid ( bottom line ) for large ( mean ) @xmath395 , while a shoulder is seen in the intermediate frequency range . while this is confirmed by preliminary simulations , we do at present not understand the role of the quenched noise injected in the model which is seen to strongly influence the shear stress fluctuations @xmath55 ( especially if fluffy layers happen to appear ) . also the understanding of finite system - size effects is of course crucial for such a low - dimensional model . ( only systems containing @xmath396 particles have been considered so far . ) as sketched in panel ( c ) the key question is to describe accurately for asymptotically long simulation runs and asymptotically large box sizes the shape of @xmath35 around the glass transition temperature @xmath397 where the shear modulus vanishes and @xmath348 should again have a maximum . thanks the cnrs and the irtg soft matter for supporting her sabbatical stay in strasbourg , p.p . the rgion alsace and the irtg soft matter and f.w . the daad for funding . we are indebted to a. blumen ( freiburg ) and h. meyer , o. benzerara and j. farago ( all ics , strasbourg ) for helpful discussions . we have focused in the main part of this paper on the shear modulus @xmath0 of our glass - forming model systems and the comparison of the three observables @xmath48 , @xmath151 and @xmath54 . being isotropic the complete macroscopic elastic description of our systems only requires the numerical determination of _ one _ additional elastic modulus , the isothermal compression modulus @xcite , @xmath398 characterizing the elastic response with respect to a volumetric ( dilatational ) strain fluctuation as shown in fig . [ fig_sketch](d ) . as discussed in the standard textbooks @xcite , the extensive variable is here the volume @xmath399 and the conjugated intensive variable the negative pressure @xmath400 where @xmath401 and @xmath402 stand for the instantaneous values of the volume and the pressure . with these notations eq . ( [ eq_pkv ] ) is obviously consistent with eq . ( [ eq_ftom ] ) or eq . ( [ eq_htom ] ) . in analogy with @xmath48 for the shear modulus @xmath0 , the compression modulus @xmath20 may be determined in an @xmath155- or an @xmath50-ensemble using the linear regression relation @xmath403 where the index @xmath404 indicates that both the measured instantaneous volume @xmath401 and pressure @xmath402 have been used . the corresponding correlation coefficient is @xmath405 since from eq . ( [ eq_dxdi ] ) we have @xmath406 if @xmath6 is imposed , this implies that @xmath407 should be identical to the better known relation @xcite @xmath408 which corresponds to the operational definition @xmath151 discussed above . the compression modulus @xmath20 may of course also be determined using the pressure fluctuations in systems of imposed volume @xmath12 as sketched in fig . [ fig_sketch](c ) . as ( to our knowledge ) first derived by rowlinson @xcite , the corresponding stress fluctuation formula reads @xmath409 being the fluctuation of the total normal pressure ( corresponding to @xmath55 ) and @xmath259 the affine dilatational elasticity " ( corresponding to @xmath26 ) . we shall give below a proper operational definition for @xmath259 . here we only note that due to the general legendre transformation eq . ( [ eq_didi ] ) for intensive variables one knows immediately that @xmath410 this implies by comparison with eq . ( [ eq_kmodpp ] ) that @xmath411 in analogy to eq . ( [ eq_muamuftau ] ) for the shear , i.e. @xmath259 can be directly be determined from the pressure fluctuations in @xmath155- and @xmath50-ensembles . as before for the correlation coefficient @xmath90 , eq . ( [ eq_cmodgt_mua ] ) , it follows from eq . ( [ eq_etaaetafp ] ) that @xmath412 since @xmath413 , the affine dilatational elasticity sets an upper bound to the compression modulus @xmath20 . we reformulate here briefly the derivation of the stress fluctuation relation @xmath258 for the compression modulus @xmath20 of an isotropic system at imposed volume @xmath12 by rowlinson @xcite . with @xmath414 being the volume of the unperturbed simulation box we assume a small relative volume change @xmath415 with all coordinates equally deformed as , e.g. @xmath416 for the @xmath105-coordinate in @xmath19-dimensions . ( the argument @xmath99 denotes again the reference system . ) using a similar rescaling trick as for the shear modulus @xmath0 in sec . [ theo_stressfluctu ] , the interaction energy @xmath417 of a configuration @xmath98 of the strained system is expressed in terms of the coordinates ( state ) of the unperturbed system and the explicit metric parameter @xmath229 . due to the volume change we have now also to take into account the ideal gas ( kinetic ) contributions . we derive first the excess contribution @xmath29 to the total pressure @xmath418 and the excess contribution @xmath419 to the total compression modulus @xmath420 valid for an arbitrary conservative potential . the general relations eqs . ( [ eq_dlogzdgam]-[eq_ddzddgam ] ) stated above for an imposed shear strain @xmath3 still hold with the relative volume change @xmath229 replacing @xmath3 . using eq . ( [ eq_dzdgam ] ) it follows for the excess pressure that @xmath421 _ defining _ the instantaneous excess pressure @xcite . in the second step we have taken the limit @xmath422 and have dropped the argument @xmath99 . the average is again evaluated using the weights of the unperturbed system , eq . ( [ eq_average ] ) . using eq . ( [ eq_ddlogzddgam ] ) and eq . ( [ eq_ddzddgam ] ) one obtains for the compression modulus @xmath423 which is again understood to be taken at @xmath424 . the first term @xmath425 in eq . ( [ eq_kexstressfluctu ] ) corresponds to the change of the system energy assuming an affine strain transformation for all particle positions . it gives the excess contribution @xmath426 to the total affine dilatational elasticity @xmath427 . the second term corresponds to the excess contribution @xmath428 to the total normal pressure fluctuation @xmath429 mentioned in sec . [ app_kstrainfluctu ] . it corrects the overprediction of the affine strain contribution @xmath426 @xcite . we remind that for an ideal gas the isothermal compression modulus @xmath430 is given by the ideal gas pressure @xmath145 and that the ideal gas pressure fluctuation @xmath431 becomes @xmath432 at constant volume @xcite . interestingly , using again the general legendre transform eq . ( [ eq_didi ] ) one sees that @xmath433 for the ideal gas pressure fluctuations at imposed pressure . due the assumed additivity of the total system hamiltonian , the stress fluctuation formula for the total compression modulus may now be written @xmath434 while this result is useful for constant-@xmath12 ensembles , especially if mc simulations are used , it is yet not in a form exactly equivalent to the general legendre transform eq . ( [ eq_kmodpp ] ) . since the ideal and excess pressure fluctuations are decoupled , @xmath435 , this implies @xmath429 . one may thus rewrite eq . ( [ eq_kconstantv ] ) as @xmath436 with @xmath437 where we have used eq . ( [ eq_etafidp ] ) in the second step . assuming eq . ( [ eq_etaaexid ] ) assures that @xmath259 becomes equivalent to @xmath438 . this has the nice feature that not only the functional @xmath258 , eq . ( [ eq_kmodpp ] ) , should give the correct compression modulus @xmath20 in the @xmath37 and the @xmath49 ensembles , but also that @xmath258 must vanish properly if the wrong " @xmath155 and @xmath155 ensembles are used , just as @xmath54 vanishes for @xmath49- or @xmath50-ensembles . up to now we have not taken advantage of the fact that the conservative interaction potential is assumed to be a pair potential , eq . ( [ eq_upairinteraction ] ) . this will be used now to express @xmath29 and @xmath426 in terms of simple ( ensemble independent ) two - point correlation functions . equation ( [ eq_strain_x_epsilon ] ) implies that the squared distance @xmath114 between two particles transforms as @xmath439 it follows that @xmath440 where we have taken finally for both derivatives the limit @xmath422 . for the first two derivatives of a general function @xmath441 with respect to @xmath229 this implies @xmath442 for @xmath422 and dropping the argument @xmath99 on the right - hand sides . according to the general result eq . ( [ eq_peshat_us ] ) for the normal pressure and using eq . ( [ eq_strain_fronebeps ] ) one confirms for pair interactions the expected virial relation @xcite @xmath443 for the instantaneous excess pressure where the interactions between pairs of particles @xmath133 are again labeled by an index @xmath130 . using eq . ( [ eq_strain_rtwo_epsilon ] ) the excess contribution to the affine dilatational elasticity becomes @xmath444 is sometimes called the hypervirial " contribution to the compression modulus @xcite . it corresponds to the first term indicated in eq . ( [ eq_strain_frtwobeps ] ) . by comparing eq . ( [ eq_etab ] ) with eq . ( [ eq_mub ] ) it is readily seen that for isotropic systems @xmath445 i.e. @xmath256 and @xmath28 and , hence , the affine dilatational elasticity @xmath259 and affine shear elasticity @xmath26 are closely related . ( this justifies to call @xmath256 a born coefficient " . ) please note that eq . ( [ eq_kmodpp ] ) or eq . ( [ eq_kconstantv ] ) together with eq . ( [ eq_etaaex ] ) are perfectly consistent with the relations stated in the literature @xcite . we emphasize finally that , as discussed for the affine shear elasticity @xmath26 in sec . [ theo_stressfluctu ] , it is inconsistent to neglect the explicit excess pressure contribution to @xmath259 in eq . ( [ eq_etaaex ] ) but to keep the underlined term of the born coefficient @xmath256 , eq . ( [ eq_etab ] ) @xcite . the affine dilatational elasticity @xmath446 obtained for both models is presented in the inset of fig . [ fig_kt ] as a function of the reduced temperature @xmath447 . ( the values may also be found in table [ tab_ka ] and table [ tab_plj ] . ) we remind that for determining the born coefficient @xmath256 impulsive corrections need to be considered as discussed at the end of sec . [ theo_trunc ] . as shown by the small filled triangles , @xmath259 compares well with the total pressure fluctuation @xmath448 in an @xmath50-ensemble . the observed data collapse is expected from eq . ( [ eq_etaaetafp ] ) and eq . ( [ eq_etafidp ] ) . as indicated by bold and dashed lines for , respectively , the low- and high-@xmath5 limit @xmath259 decreases essentially linearly with temperature . the coefficients of the lines ( not shown ) are consistent with eq . ( [ eq_etabmub ] ) relating @xmath259 and @xmath26 and the fits given in fig . [ fig_muamuf_t ] for @xmath26 . we emphasize that the affine dilatational elasticity @xmath259 ( and thus @xmath26 ) is not only larger for the ka model but , more importantly that , is also increases more rapidly with decreasing @xmath5 than the plj model . the main panel of fig . [ fig_kt ] shows the best long - time values of the compression modulus @xmath20 for both models . the vertical axis is rescaled by @xmath259 . the rescaled stress fluctuation formula , eq . ( [ eq_kconstantv ] ) , for the @xmath37-ensemble is given for both models . for the plj model we also indicate @xmath407 ( crosses ) and @xmath449 ( large triangles ) for the @xmath50-ensemble . no rescaling with @xmath259 is necessary for the squared correlation coefficient @xmath450 ( stars ) also presented . a perfect collapse of all plj data is found confirming the equivalence of all operational definitions used . for both models we observe a strong increase of @xmath451 around @xmath452 with decreasing temperature . interestingly , the rescaled data of both models is similar but not identical . the mentioned increase around @xmath452 is clearly more pronounced for the ka model . note that if the unscaled @xmath20 is directly plotted against @xmath5 , this effect becomes even stronger ( not shown ) consistently with the scaling of @xmath259 presented in the inset . we note finally that for very low temperatures we observe for both models that the ratio @xmath453 approaches unity , i.e. the compression modulus is essentially dominated by the affine response . we remind that this is different for the reduced shear modulus for both models which is observed to approach @xmath454 in the low-@xmath5 limit ( fig . [ fig_gt_rescal ] ) , i.e. the shear stress fluctuations @xmath364 are more relevant than the pressure fluctuations @xmath455 in this limit . for the plj model we present in fig . [ fig_kt_thigh ] the sampling time dependence of various operation definitions of @xmath20 for the liquid limit at temperature @xmath456 . the horizontal axis indicates the sampling time @xmath32 in units of mcs , the vertical axis is made dimensionless using @xmath259 as natural scale . as shown for @xmath407 and @xmath449 obtained in the @xmath50-ensemble and for @xmath258 obtained using eq . ( [ eq_kconstantv ] ) in the @xmath37-ensemble , all operational definitions applied in their natural ensemble converge _ rapidly _ within @xmath457 mcs to the same plateau . ( this is a general finding for all temperatures . ) the plateau value for @xmath456 is indicated by the bold solid line . note that @xmath451 is smaller unity as expected from the discussion at the end of sec . [ app_kstrainfluctu ] . the small filled symbols refer to @xmath258 computed in the wrong " @xmath50-ensemble . the small diamonds have been computed using directly eq . ( [ eq_kconstantv ] ) . as indicated by the dashed line , this yields @xmath458 for large times . only if we compute @xmath436 using eq . ( [ eq_etaaexid ] ) , it does vanish properly as shown by the small triangles . this shows numerically that eq . ( [ eq_kconstantv ] ) , albeit perfectly fine for constant-@xmath12 ensembles , is just not the correct formulation allowing to make manifest the general legendre transformation eq . ( [ eq_etaftransform ] ) . this is , however , achieved using eq . ( [ eq_etaaexid ] ) . this finding holds rigorously for all temperatures as can be seen from the scaling of the small triangles in the inset of fig . [ fig_kt ] . Abstract:

Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.

Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered . Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video . Paper: many solids have a crystalline structure . however , ideal crystals are absent in nature , and most of their physical properties , such as plasticity , melting , growth , etc . , are defined by defects of the crystalline structure . therefore , a study of defects is a topical scientific question of importance for applications in the first place . a broad experimental and theoretical investigations of defects in crystals started in the 1930s and continues nowadays . at present , a fundamental theory of defects is absent in spite of the existence of dozens of monographs and thousands of articles . one of the most promising approaches to the theory of defects is based on riemann cartan geometry , which involves nontrivial metric and torsion . in this approach , a crystal is considered as a continuous elastic medium with a spin structure . if the displacement vector field is a smooth function , then there are only elastic stresses corresponding to diffeomorphisms of the euclidean space . if the displacement vector field has discontinuities , then we are saying that there are defects in the elastic structure . defects in the elastic structure are called dislocations and lead to the appearance of nontrivial geometry . precisely , they correspond to a nonzero torsion tensor , equal to the surface density of the burgers vector . the idea to relate torsion to dislocations appeared in the 1950s [ 14 ] . this approach is still being successfully developed ( note reviews [ 511 ] ) , and is often called the gauge theory of dislocations . a similar approach is also being developed in gravity @xcite . it is interesting to note that e cartan introduced torsion in geometry @xcite having the analogy with mechanics of elastic media in mind . the gauge approach to the theory of defects is being developed successfully , and interesting results are being obtained in this way [ 1417 ] . we note in this connection two respects in which the approach proposed below is essentially different . in the gauge models of dislocations based on the translational group or on the semidirect product of the rotational group with translations , one usually chooses the distortion and displacement fields as independent variables . it is always possible to fix the invariance under local translations such that the displacement field becomes zero because it transforms by simple translation under the action of the translational group . in this sense , the displacement field is the gauge parameter of local translations , and physical observables are independent of it in gauge - invariant models . the other disadvantage of the gauge approach is the equations of equilibrium . einstein type equations are usually considered for distortion or vielbein , with the right hand side depending on the stress tensor . this appears unacceptable from the physical point of view because of the following reason . consider , for example , one straight edge dislocation . in this case , the elastic stress field differs from zero everywhere . then the torsion tensor ( or curvature ) is also nontrivial in the whole space due to the equations of equilibrium . this is wrong from our point of view . indeed , we can consider an arbitrary domain of medium outside the cutting surface and look at the creation process for an edge dislocation . the chosen domain was a part of the euclidean space with identically zero torsion and curvature before the defect creation . it is clear that torsion and curvature remain zero because the process of dislocation formation is a diffeomorphism for the considered domain . in addition , the cutting surface may be chosen arbitrary for the defect creation , leaving the dislocation axis unchanged . then it follows that torsion and curvature must be zero everywhere except at the axis of dislocation . in other words , the elasticity stress tensor can not be the source of dislocations . to avoid the apparent contradiction , we propose a radical way out : we do not use the displacement field as an independent variable at all . this does not mean that the displacement field does not exist in real crystals . in the proposed approach , the displacement field exists and can be computed in those regions of medium that do not contain cores of dislocations . in this case , it satisfies the equations of nonlinear elasticity theory . the proposed geometric approach allows considering other defects that do not relate directly to defects of elastic media . the intensive investigations of other defects were conducted in parallel with the study of dislocations . the point is that many solids have not only elastic properties but also a spin structure . for example , there are ferromagnets , liquid crystals , spin glasses . in this case , there are defects in the spin structure which are called disclinations @xcite . they arise when the director field has discontinuities . the presence of disclinations is also connected to nontrivial geometry . namely , the curvature tensor equals the surface density of the frank vector . the gauge approach based on the rotational group @xmath0 was also used for describing disclinations @xcite . @xmath0-gauge models of spin glasses with defects were considered in @xcite . the geometric theory of static distribution of defects which describes both types of defects dislocation and disclinations from a single standpoint was proposed in @xcite . in contrast to other approaches , it involves the vielbein and @xmath0 connection as the only independent variables . the torsion and curvature tensors have direct physical meaning as the surface densities of dislocations and disclinations , respectively . covariant equations of equilibrium for the vielbein and @xmath0 connection similar to those in a gravity model with torsion are postulated . to define the solution uniquely , we must fix the coordinate system ( fix the gauge ) because any solution of the equations of equilibrium is defined up to general coordinate transformations and local @xmath0 rotations . the elastic gauge for the vielbein @xcite and lorentz gauge for the @xmath0 connection @xcite were proposed recently . we stress that the notions of a displacement vector and rotational angle are completely absent in our approach . these notions can be introduced only in those domains where defects are absent . in this case , equations for vielbein and @xmath0 connection are identically satisfied , the elastic gauge reduces to the equations of nonlinear elasticity theory for the displacement vector , and the lorentz gauge leads to the equations for the principal chiral @xmath0 field . in other words , to fix the coordinate system , we choose two fundamental models : the elasticity theory and the principal chiral field model . to show the advantages of the geometric approach and to compare it with the elasticity theory , we consider in detail a wedge dislocation in the frameworks of the elasticity theory and the proposed geometric model . we show that the explicit expression for the metric in the geometric approach is simpler and coincides with the induced metric obtained within the elasticity theory only for small relative deformations . as an application of the geometric theory of defects , we consider two examples in the last sections of the present review . first , we solve the problem of phonon scattering on a wedge dislocation . the problem of phonon scattering is reduced to the integration of equations for extremals for the metric describing a wedge dislocation ( because phonons move along extremals in the eikonal approximation ) . as a second application , we consider the quantum mechanical problem of impurity or vacancy motion inside a cylinder whose axis coincides with a wedge dislocation . the wave functions and energetic spectrum of the impurity are found explicitly . the presence of defects results in nontrivial riemann cartan geometry . this means that for describing the phenomena that relate ingeniously to elastic media , we must make changes in the corresponding equations . for example , if a phonon propagation in an ideal crystal is described by the wave equation , then the presence of defects is easily taken into account . for this , the flat euclidean metric has to be replaced by a nontrivial metric describing the distribution of defects . the same substitution must be made in the schrdinger equation to describe other quantum effects . it is shown nowadays that the presence of defects essentially influences physical phenomena . the schrdinger equation in the presence of dislocations was considered in [ 2546 ] for different problems . problems related to the wave or laplace equations were considered in [ 4754 ] . the influence of the nontrivial metric related to the presence of defects was investigated in electrodynamics @xcite and hydrodynamics @xcite . scattering of phonons on straight parallel dislocations was studied in [ 5759 ] . another approach to the theory of defects based on affine geometry with nonzero nonmetricity tensor was considered recently in @xcite . we consider infinite three dimensional elastic media . we suppose that the undeformed medium in the defect - free case is invariant under translations and rotations in some coordinate system . then , the medium in this coordinate system @xmath1 , @xmath2 , is described by the euclidean metric @xmath3 , and the system of coordinates is called cartesian . thus , in the undeformed state , we have the euclidean space @xmath4 with a given cartesian coordinate system . we also assume that torsion ( see the appendix ) in the medium equals zero . let a point of the medium has coordinates @xmath1 in the ground state . after deformation , this point has the coordinates @xmath5 .45 in the initial coordinate system , see fig . [ feldef ] . the inverse notation is used in the elasticity theory . one usually writes @xmath6 . these are equivalent because both coordinate systems @xmath7 and @xmath1 cover the whole @xmath4 . however , in the theory of defects considered in the next sections , the situation is different . generally , the elastic medium fills the whole euclidean space only in the final state . here and in what follows , we assume that fields depend on coordinates @xmath8 that are coordinates of points of the medium after the deformation and cover the whole euclidean space @xmath4 . in the presence of dislocations , the coordinates @xmath1 do not cover the whole @xmath4 in the general case because part of the media may be removed or , conversely , added . therefore , the system of coordinates related to points of the medium after an elastic deformation and defect creation is more preferable . in the linear elasticity theory , relative deformations are assumed to be small ( @xmath9 ) . the functions @xmath10 are then components of a vector field that is called the displacement vector field and is the basic variable in elasticity theory . in the absence of defects , we assume that the displacement field is a smooth vector field in the euclidean space @xmath4 . the presence of discontinuities and singularities of the displacement field is interpreted as a presence of defects in elastic media . in what follows , we consider only static deformations with the displacement field @xmath11 independent of time . then the basic equations of equilibrium for small deformations are ( see , e.g. , @xcite ) @xmath12 where @xmath13 is the stress tensor , which is assumed to be symmetric . the tensor of small deformations @xmath14 is given by the symmetrized partial derivative of the displacement vector : @xmath15 lowering and raising of the latin indices is performed with the euclidean metric @xmath16 and its inverse @xmath17 . the letters @xmath18 and @xmath19 denote constants characterizing elastic properties of media and are called lam coefficients . functions @xmath20 describe the total density of nonelastic forces inside the medium . we assume in what follows that such forces are absent : @xmath21 . equation ( [ estati ] ) is newton s law , and eqn ( [ ehook ] ) is hook s law relating stresses to deformations . in a cartesian coordinate system and for small deformations , the difference between upper and lower indices disappears because raising and lowering of indices is performed with the help of the euclidean metric . one usually forgets about this difference due to this reason , and this is fully justified . but in the presence of defects , the notion of cartesian coordinate system and euclidean metric is absent , and the indices are raised and lowered with the help of riemannian metric . therefore , we distinguish the upper and lower indices as is accepted in differential geometry , having the transition to elastic media with defects in mind . the main problem in the linear elasticity theory is the solution of the second - order equations for the displacement vector that arise after substitution of ( [ ehook ] ) into ( [ estati ] ) with some boundary conditions . many known solutions are in good agreement with experiment . therefore , one may say that equations ( [ ehook ] ) , ( [ estati ] ) have a solid experimental background . we now look at the elastic deformations from the standpoint of differential geometry . from the mathematical standpoint , map ( [ eeldef ] ) is itself a diffeomorphism of the euclidean space @xmath4 . the euclidean metric @xmath16 is then induced by the map @xmath22 . it means that in the deformed state , the metric in the linear approximation is given by @xmath23 i.e. , is defined by the tensor of small deformations ( [ edefte ] ) . we note that in the linear approximation , @xmath24 and @xmath25 . in riemannian geometry , the metric uniquely defines the levi civita connection @xmath26 ( christoffel s symbols ) , eqn ( [ etigam ] ) . we can compute curvature tensor ( [ ecurva ] ) for these symbols . this tensor equals identically zero , @xmath27 , because the curvature of the euclidean space is zero , and the map @xmath22 is a diffeomorphism . the torsion tensor is equal to zero for the same reason . thus , an elastic deformation of the medium corresponds to the trivial riemann cartan geometry , with zero curvature and torsion tensors . the physical interpretation of metric ( [ emetri ] ) is as follows . the external observer fixes cartesian coordinate system corresponding to the ground undeformed state of the medium . the medium is then deformed , and external observer discovers that the metric becomes nontrivial in this coordinate system . if we assume that elastic perturbations in the medium ( phonons ) propagate along extremals ( lines of minimal length ) , then their trajectories in the deformed medium are defined by eqns ( [ exteqr ] ) . trajectories of phonons are now not straight lines because the christoffel s symbols are nontrivial ( @xmath28 ) . in this sense , metric ( [ emetri ] ) is observable . here , we see the essential role of the cartesian coordinate system @xmath1 defined by the undeformed state , with which the measurement process is connected . we assume that the metric @xmath29 given in the cartesian coordinates corresponds to some state of elastic media without defects . the displacement vector is then defined by the system of equations ( [ emetri ] ) , and its integrability conditions are the equality of the curvature tensor to zero , in accordance with theorem [ tlocev ] in the appendix . in the linear approximation , these conditions are known in elasticity theory as the saint venant integrability conditions . we make a remark that is important for the following consideration . for appropriate boundary conditions , the solution of the elasticity theory equations ( [ estati ] ) , ( [ ehook ] ) is unique . from the geometric standpoint , this means that elasticity theory fixes diffeomorphisms . this fact is used in the geometric theory of defects . equations of nonlinear elasticity theory written in terms of the metric or vielbein are used for fixing the coordinate system . we start with the description of linear dislocations in elastic media ( see , e.g. , @xcite ) . the simplest and most undespread examples of linear dislocations are shown in fig . [ fdislo ] . we cut the medium along the half - plane @xmath30 , @xmath31 , move the upper part of the medium located over the cut @xmath32 , @xmath31 by the vector @xmath33 towards the dislocation axis @xmath34 , and glue the cutting surfaces . the vector @xmath33 is called the burgers vector . in the general case , the burgers vector may not be constant on the cut . for the edge dislocation , it varies from zero to some constant value @xmath33 as it moves from the dislocation axis . after the gluing , the media comes to the equilibrium state called the edge dislocation , see fig . [ fdislo]_a_. if the burgers vector is parallel to the dislocation line , it is called the screw dislocation ( fig . [ fdislo]_b _ ) . the same dislocation can be made in different ways . for example , if the burgers vector is perpendicular to the cutting plane and directed from it in the considered cases , then the produced cavity must be filled with medium before gluing . it is easy to imagine that the edge dislocation is also obtained as a result , but rotated by the angle @xmath35 around the @xmath34 axis . this example shows that a dislocation is characterized not by the cutting surface but by the dislocation line and the burgers vector . straight linear dislocations . ( _ a _ ) the edge dislocation . the burgers vector @xmath33 is perpendicular to the dislocation line . ( _ b _ ) the screw dislocation . the burgers vector @xmath33 is parallel to the dislocation line.,title="fig : " ] straight linear dislocations . ( _ a _ ) the edge dislocation . the burgers vector @xmath33 is perpendicular to the dislocation line . ( _ b _ ) the screw dislocation . the burgers vector @xmath33 is parallel to the dislocation line.,title="fig : " ] + from the topological standpoint , the medium containing several dislocations or even the infinite number of them is the euclidean space @xmath4 . in contrast to the case of elastic deformations , the displacement vector in the presence of dislocations is no longer a smooth function because of the presence of cutting surfaces . at the same time , we assume that partial derivatives of the displacement vector @xmath36 ( the distortion tensor ) are smooth functions on the cutting surface . this assumption is justified physically because these derivatives define deformation tensor ( [ edefte ] ) . in its turn , partial derivatives of the deformation tensor must exist and be smooth functions in the equilibrium state everywhere except , possibly , the dislocation axis , because otherwise equations of equilibrium ( [ estati ] ) have no meaning . we assume that the metric and vielbein are smooth functions everywhere in @xmath4 except , may be , dislocation axes , because the deformation tensor defines the induced metric ( [ emetri ] ) . the main idea of the geometric approach amounts to the following . to describe single dislocations in the framework of elasticity theory we must solve equations for the displacement vector with some boundary conditions on the cuts . this is possible for small number of dislocations . but , with an increasing number of dislocations , the boundary conditions become so complicated that the solution of the problem becomes unrealistic . besides , one and the same dislocation can be created by different cuts which leads to an ambiguity in the displacement vector field . another shortcoming of this approach is that it can not be applied to the description of a continuous distribution of dislocations because the displacement vector field does not exist in this case at all because it must have discontinuities at every point . in the geometric approach , the basic variable is the vielbein which by assumption is a smooth function everywhere except , possibly , dislocation axes . we postulate new equations for the vielbein ( see section [ sequil ] ) . in the geometric approach , the transition from a finite number of dislocations to their continuous distribution is simple and natural . in that way , the smoothing of singularities occurs on dislocation axes in analogy with smoothing of mass distribution for point particles in passing to continuous media . we now develop the formalism of the geometric approach . in a general defect - present case , we do not have a preferred cartesian coordinate frame in the equilibrium because there is no symmetry . therefore , we consider arbitrary coordinates @xmath37 , @xmath38 , in @xmath4 . we use greek letters for coordinates allowing arbitrary coordinate changes . then the burgers vector can be expressed as the integral of the displacement vector @xmath39 where @xmath40 is a closed contour surrounding the dislocation axis , fig . [ fburco ] . .45 this integral is invariant under arbitrary coordinate transformations @xmath41 and covariant under global @xmath0-rotations of @xmath1 . here , components of the displacement vector field @xmath42 are considered with respect to the orthonormal basis in the tangent space , @xmath43 . if components of the displacement vector field are considered with respect to the coordinate basis @xmath44 , the invariance of the integral ( [ eburge ] ) under general coordinate changes is violated . in the geometric approach , we introduce new independent variable the vielbein instead of partial derivatives @xmath45 @xmath46 the vielbein is a smooth function on the cut by construction . we note that if the vielbein was simply defined as the partial derivative @xmath47 , then it would have the @xmath48-function singularity on the cut because functions @xmath49 have a jump . the burgers vector can be expressed through the integral over a surface @xmath50 having contour @xmath40 as the boundary @xmath51 where @xmath52 is the surface element . as a consequence of the definition of the vielbein in ( [ edevid ] ) , the integrand is equal to zero everywhere except at the dislocation axis . for the edge dislocation with constant burgers vector , the integrand has a @xmath48-function singularity at the origin . the criterion for the presence of a dislocation is a violation of the integrability conditions for the system of equations @xmath53 : @xmath54 if dislocations are absent , then the functions @xmath49 exist and define transformation to a cartesian coordinates frame . in the geometric theory of defects , the field @xmath55 is identified with the vielbein . next , we compare the integrand in ( [ eburg2 ] ) with the expression for the torsion in cartan variables ( [ ecurcv ] ) . they differ only by terms containing the @xmath0 connection . this is the ground for the introduction of the following postulate . in the geometric theory of defects , the burgers vector corresponding to a surface @xmath50 is defined by the integral of the torsion tensor : @xmath56 this definition is invariant with respect to general coordinate transformations of @xmath37 and covariant with respect to global rotations . thus , the torsion tensor has straightforward physical interpretation : it is equal to the surface density of the burgers vector . the physical interpretation of the @xmath0 connection is given in section [ sdiscl ] , and now we show how this definition reduces to the expression for the burgers vector ( [ eburg2 ] ) obtained within elasticity theory . if the curvature tensor for the @xmath0 connection is zero , then , according to theorem [ tlotrs ] , the connection is locally trivial , and there exists such @xmath0 rotation such that @xmath57 . in this case , we return to expression ( [ eburg2 ] ) . if the @xmath0 connection is zero and vielbein is a smooth function , then the burgers vector corresponds uniquely to every contour . it can then be expressed as a surface integral of the torsion tensor . the surface integral depends only on the boundary contour but not on the surface due to the stokes theorem . .45 we have shown that the presence of linear defects results in a nontrivial torsion tensor . in the geometric theory of defects , the equality of the torsion tensor to zero @xmath58 is naturally considered the criterion for the absence of dislocations . then , under the name dislocation fall not only linear dislocations but , in fact , arbitrary defects in elastic media . for example , point defects ; vacancies and impurities , are also dislocations . in the first case we cut out a ball from the euclidean space @xmath4 and then shrink the boundary sphere to a point ( fig . [ fpoide ] ) . in the case of impurity , a point of the euclidean space is blown up to a sphere and the produced cavity is filled with the medium . point defects are characterized by the mass of the removed or added media , which is also defined by the vielbein @xcite @xmath59 where @xmath49 are the transition functions to a cartesian coordinate frame in @xmath4 and @xmath60 is the density of the medium which is supposed to be constant . the mass is defined by the difference of two integrals , each of them being separately divergent . the first integral equals to the volume of the medium with defects and the second is equal to the volume of the euclidean space . the torsion tensor for a vacancy or impurity is zero everywhere except at one point , where it has a @xmath48-function singularity . for point defects , the notion of the burgers vector is absent . according to the given definition , the mass of an impurity is positive because the matter is added to the media , and the mass of a vacancy is negative because part of the medium is removed . the negative sign of the mass causes serious problems for a physical interpretation of solutions of the equations of motion or the schrdinger equation . hence , we make a remark . strictly speaking , the integral ( [ emass ] ) should be called the `` bare '' mass because this expression does not account for elastic stresses arising around a point dislocation . the effective mass of such a defect must contain at least two contributions : the bare mass and the free energy coming from elastic stresses . the question about the sign of the effective mass is not solved yet and demands a separate analysis . surface defects may also exist in three - dimensional space , in addition to point and line dislocations . in the geometric approach , all of them are called dislocations because they correspond to a nontrivial torsion . in the preceeding section , we related dislocations to a nontrivial torsion tensor . for this , we introduced an @xmath0 connection . now we show that the curvature tensor for the @xmath0 connection defines the surface density of the frank vector characterizing other well - known defects disclinations in the spin structure of media @xcite . let a unit vector field @xmath61 @xmath62 be given at all points of the medium . for example , @xmath63 has the meaning of the magnetic moment located at each point of the medium for ferromagnets ( fig . [ fspstr]_a _ ) . for nematic liquid crystals , the unit vector field @xmath63 with the equivalence relation @xmath64 describes the director field ( fig . [ fspstr]_b _ ) . examples of media with the spin structure : ( _ a _ ) ferromagnet , ( _ b _ ) liquid crystal.,title="fig : " ] examples of media with the spin structure : ( _ a _ ) ferromagnet , ( _ b _ ) liquid crystal.,title="fig : " ] + we fix some direction in the medium @xmath65 . then the field @xmath61 at a point @xmath8 can be uniquely defined by the field @xmath66 taking values in the rotation algebra @xmath67 ( the rotation angle ) , @xmath68 where @xmath69 is the rotation matrix corresponding to the algebra element @xmath70 . here , we use the following parameterization of the rotation group @xmath0 by elements of its algebra ( see , e.g. , @xcite ) @xmath71 where @xmath72 and @xmath73 is the modulus of the vector @xmath74 . the pseudovector @xmath75 , where @xmath76 is the totally antisymmetric third - rank tensor , @xmath77 , is directed along the rotation axis and its length equals the rotation angle . we call the field @xmath70 spin structure of the media . if a media has a spin structure , then it may have defects called disclinations . for linear disclinations parallel to the @xmath34 axis , the vector field @xmath78 lies in the perpendicular plain @xmath79 . the simplest examples of linear disclinations are shown in fig . [ fdiscl ] . the vector field distributions on the plane @xmath79 for the linear disclinations parallel to the @xmath34 axis . ( _ a _ ) @xmath80 . ( _ b _ ) @xmath81.,title="fig : " ] the vector field distributions on the plane @xmath79 for the linear disclinations parallel to the @xmath34 axis . ( _ a _ ) @xmath80 . ( _ b _ ) @xmath81.,title="fig : " ] + every linear disclination is characterized by the frank vector @xmath82 where @xmath83 and the integral is taken along closed contour @xmath40 surrounding the disclination axis . the length of the frank vector is equal to the total angle of rotation of the field @xmath63 as it goes around the disclination . the vector field @xmath63 defines a map of the euclidean space to a sphere @xmath84 . for linear disclinations parallel to the @xmath34 axis , this map is restricted to a map of the plane @xmath85 to a circle @xmath86 . in this case , the total rotation angle must obviously be a multiple of @xmath87 . for nematic liquid crystals , we have the equivalence relation @xmath64 . therefore , for linear disclinations parallel to the @xmath34 axis , the director field defines a map of the plane into the projective line @xmath88 . in this case , the length of the frank vector must be a multiple of @xmath89 . the corresponding examples of disclinations are shown in fig . [ fdisc2 ] . the director field distribution in the @xmath79 plane for the linear disclinations parallel to the @xmath34 axis . ( _ a _ ) @xmath90 and ( _ b _ ) @xmath91.,title="fig : " ] the director field distribution in the @xmath79 plane for the linear disclinations parallel to the @xmath34 axis . ( _ a _ ) @xmath90 and ( _ b _ ) @xmath91.,title="fig : " ] + as for the displacement field , the field @xmath92 , taking values in the algebra @xmath67 , is not a smooth function in @xmath4 in the presence of disclinations . we make a cut in @xmath4 bounded by the disclination axis . then the field @xmath92 may be considered smooth in the whole space except the cut . we assume that all partial derivatives of @xmath92 have the same limit as it approaches the cut from both sides . then we define the new field @xmath93 the functions @xmath94 are smooth everywhere by construction except , may be , on the disclination axis . then the frank vector may be expressed as the surface integral @xmath95 where @xmath50 is an arbitrary surface having the contour @xmath40 as the boundary . if the field @xmath94 is given , then the integrability conditions for the system of equations @xmath96 are @xmath97 this noncovariant equality yields the criterion for the absence of disclinations . in the geometric theory of defects , we identify the field @xmath94 with the @xmath0 connection . in the expression for the curvature in ( [ ecucav ] ) , the first two terms coincide with ( [ eomcon ] ) , and we therefore postulate the covariant criterion of the absence of disclinations as the equality of the curvature tensor for the @xmath0 connection to zero : @xmath98 simultaneously , we give the physical interpretation of the curvature tensor as the surface density of the frank vector @xmath99 this definition reduces to the previous expression for the frank vector ( [ efrank ] ) in the case where rotation of the vector @xmath78 occures in a fixed plane . in this case , rotations are restricted by the subgroup @xmath100 . the quadratic terms in the expression for the curvature in ( [ ecucav ] ) disappear because the rotation group @xmath101 is abelian , and we obtain the previous expression for the frank vector ( [ efrank ] ) . thus , we described the media with dislocations ( defects of elastic media ) and disclinations ( defects in the spin structure ) in the framework of riemann cartan geometry , the torsion and curvature tensors being identified with the surface density of dislocations and disclinations , respectively . the relations between physical and geometrical notions are summarized in the table [ tdegeo ] . .[tdegeo ] the relation between physical and geometrical notions in the geometric theory of defects . [ cols="<,>,>",options="header " , ] the same physical interpretation of torsion and curvature was considered in @xcite . several possible functionals for the free energy were also considered . in the next section , we propose a new expression for the free energy . until now , we discussed only the relation between physical and geometrical notions . to complete the construction of the geometric theory of defects , we have to postulate equations of equilibrium describing static distribution of defects in media . the vielbein @xmath55 and @xmath0 connection @xmath94 are basic and independent variables in the geometric approach . in contrast to previous geometric approaches , we completely abandon the displacement field @xmath11 and spin structure @xmath70 as the fields entering the system of equilibrium equations . in a general case of a continuous distribution of defects , they simply do not exist . nevertheless , at some level and under definite circumstances they can be reconstructed , and we discuss this in the following section . the expression for the free energy was derived in @xcite . we assume that equations of equilibrium must be covariant under general coordinate transformations and local rotations , be at most of the second order , and follow from a variational principle . the expression for the free energy leading to the equilibrium equations must then be equal to a volume integral of the scalar function ( the lagrangian ) that is quadratic in torsion and curvature tensors . there are three independent invariants quadratic in the torsion tensor and three independent invariants quadratic in the curvature tensor in three dimensions . it is possible to add the scalar curvature and a `` cosmological '' constant @xmath102 . we thus obtain a general eight - parameter lagrangian @xmath103 where @xmath104 , @xmath105 and @xmath106 are some constants , and we have introduced the trace of torsion tensor @xmath107 and the ricci tensor @xmath108 . here and in what follows , transformation of the greek indices into the latin ones and vice versa is always performed using the vielbein and its inverse . for example , @xmath109 the particular feature of three dimensions is that the full curvature tensor is in a one - to - one correspondence with ricci tensor ( [ ecurir ] ) and has three irreducible components . therefore , the lagrangian contains only three independent invariants quadratic in curvature tensor . we do not need to add the hilbert einstein lagrangian @xmath110 , also yielding second - order equations , to the free energy ( [ egenla ] ) because of identity ( [ eidcur ] ) . thus , the most general lagrangian depends on eight constants and leads to very complicated equations of equilibrium . at present , we do not know precisely what values of the constants describe this or that medium . therefore , we make physically reasonable assumptions to simplify matters . namely , we require that equations of equilibrium must admit the following three types of solutions . 1 . there are solutions describing the media with only dislocations , @xmath111 . 2 . there are solutions describing the media with only disclinations , @xmath112 . 3 . there are solutions describing the media without dislocations and disclinations , @xmath113 . it turns out that these simple assumptions reduce the number of independent parameters from eight to two . we now prove this statement . the lagrangian ( [ egenla ] ) yields the equilibrium equations @xmath114 where the covariant derivative acts with the @xmath0 connection on the latin indices and with the christoffel symbols on the greek ones . for example , @xmath115 the first condition on the class of solutions of the equilibrium equations is that they permit solutions describing the presence of only dislocations in media . this means the existence of solutions with zero curvature tensor corresponding to the absence of disclinations . substitution of the condition @xmath116 into eqn ( [ econne ] ) for the @xmath117 connection yields @xmath118 here @xmath119 , @xmath120 , and @xmath121 are the irreducible components of the torsion tensor , @xmath122 where @xmath123 in a general case of dislocations all irreducible components of torsion tensor differ from zero ( @xmath119 , @xmath120 , @xmath124 ) and eqns ( [ ecotor ] ) have a unique solution @xmath125 for these coupling constants , the first four terms in lagrangian ( [ egenla ] ) are equal to the hilbert einstein lagrangian @xmath126 up to a total divergence due to identity ( [ eidcur ] ) . equation ( [ etriad ] ) then reduces to the einstein equations with a cosmological constant @xmath127 in this way , the first condition is satisfied . according to the second condition , the equations of equilibrium must allow solutions with zero torsion @xmath58 . in this case , the curvature tensor has additional symmetry @xmath128 , and eqn ( [ econne ] ) becomes @xmath129 here , we decompose the ricci tensor onto irreducible components , @xmath130 where @xmath131 note that for zero torsion , the ricci tensor is symmetrical : @xmath132 . contraction of eqn ( [ econre ] ) with @xmath133 leads to the equation @xmath134 in the general case of nonvanishing curvature , the covariant derivatives @xmath135 and @xmath136 differ from zero and are independent . therefore , we obtain two equations for the coupling constants , @xmath137 which have a unique solution @xmath138 in this case , eqn ( [ etriad ] ) for the vielbein corresponding to a nonzero torsion also reduces to einstein equations ( [ eeinst ] ) . the last requirement for the existence of solutions with zero curvature and torsion is satisfied only for the zero cosmological constant @xmath139 . therefore , the simple and physically reasonable requirements define the two parameter lagrangian @xcite @xmath140 which is the sum of the hilbert einstein lagrangian for the vielbein and the square of the antisymmetric part of the ricci tensor . we note that @xmath141 and @xmath142 are constructed for different metrical connections . other quadratic lagrangians were considered , for example , in @xcite . we note that they also contain the displacement vector as an independent variable along with the vielbein . expression ( [ elagfi ] ) defines the free energy density in the geometric theory of defects and leads to the equilibrium equations ( the euler lagrange equations ) . in our geometric approach , the displacement vector and spin structure do not enter expression ( [ elagfi ] ) for the free energy . in the geometric approach , the vielbein @xmath55 and @xmath0 connection @xmath143 are the only variables . the displacement field @xmath11 and the spin structure @xmath144 can be introduced only in those regions of media where defects are absent . as the consequence of the absence of disclinations @xmath145 , the @xmath0 connection is actually a pure gauge ( [ eloctr ] ) , i.e. , the spin structure @xmath144 exists . if , in addition , dislocations are absent ( @xmath58 ) then there is the displacement field such that the vielbein equals its partial derivatives ( [ erepad ] ) . in this and only in this case can we introduce the displacement field and spin structure . we show below that this can be done such that the equations of nonlinear elasticity theory and the principal chiral @xmath0 field are fulfilled . for free energy in ( [ elagfi ] ) , the euler lagrange equations are covariant under general coordinate transformations in @xmath4 and local @xmath0 rotations . this means that any solution of the equilibrium equations is defined up to diffeomorphisms and local rotations . for the geometric theory of defects to make predictions , we have to fix the coordinate system ( to fix the gauge in the language of gauge field theory ) . this allows us to choose a unique representative from each class of equivalent solutions . we say afterwards that this solution of the euler lagrange equations describes the distribution of defects in the laboratory coordinate system . we start with gauge - fixing the diffeomorphisms . for this , we choose the elastic gauge proposed in @xcite . this question is of primary importance , and we discuss it in detail . equations ( [ estati ] ) , ( [ ehook ] ) of elasticity theory for @xmath146 yield the second - order equation for the displacement vector @xmath147 where @xmath148 is the poisson ratio , ( @xmath149 ) , and @xmath150 is the laplace operator . it can be rewritten in terms of the induced metric ( [ emetri ] ) , for which we obtain a first - order equation . we choose precisely this equation as the gauge condition fixing the diffeomorphisms . we note that the gauge condition is not uniquely defined because the induced metric is nonlinear in the displacement vector , and different equations for the metric may have the same linear approximation . we give two possible choices , @xmath151 where we introduced the notation for the trace of metric @xmath152 . gauge conditions ( [ eonead ] ) and ( [ etwoad ] ) are understood in the following way . the metric @xmath153 is the euclidean metric written in an arbitrary coordinate system , for example , in the cylindrical or spherical coordinate system . the covariant derivative @xmath154 is built from the christoffel symbols corresponding to the metric @xmath153 , and @xmath155 as a consequence . the metric @xmath156 is the metric describing dislocations [ an exact solution of the equilibrium equations for the free energy ( [ elagfi ] ) ] . the gauge conditions differ because in the first and second cases the contraction is performed with the metric of dislocation @xmath157 and the euclidean metric @xmath158 , respectively , without changing the linear approximation . both gauge conditions yield eqn ( [ eqsepu ] ) in the linear approximation in the displacement vector ( [ emetri ] ) . this is most easily verified in cartesian coordinates . from the geometric standpoint , we have the following . the medium with dislocations is diffeomorphic to the euclidean space @xmath4 equipped with two metrics @xmath153 and @xmath156 . the metric @xmath153 is a flat euclidean metric written in an arbitrary coordinate system . the metric @xmath156 is not flat and describes the distribution of dislocations in the same coordinate system . in fact , the metric @xmath153 is used only to fix the coordinate system in which the metric @xmath156 is measured . if the solution of the equilibrium equations satisfies one of the gauge conditions ( [ eonead ] ) , ( [ etwoad ] ) , written , for example , in cylindrical coordinate system then we say that the solution is found in the cylindrical coordinates . we suppose here that the distribution of dislocations in elastic media in the laboratory cylindrical coordinate system is described by this particular solution . analogously , we may seek solutions in a cartesian , spherical , or any other coordinate system . gauge conditions may also be written for the vielbein @xmath55 , which is defined by eqn ( [ etetra ] ) . this involves additional arbitrariness because the vielbein is defined up to local rotations . this invariance leads to different linear approximations for the vielbein in terms of the displacement vector . we consider two possibilities in cartesian coordinates : @xmath159 where the index is lowered with the help of the kronecker symbol . for these possibilities and gauge condition ( [ etwoad ] ) we have two gauge conditions for the vielbein @xmath160 where @xmath161 . these conditions differ in the coefficient before the second term . we note that in a curvilinear coordinate system , the covariant derivative @xmath154 must also include the flat @xmath0 connection acting on indices @xmath162 . one can also write other possible gauge conditions having the same linear approximation . the question of the correct choice is unanswered at present and outside the scope of this review . at the moment , we want only to demonstrate that the system of coordinates must be fixed , and that the gauge condition depends on the poisson ratio , which is the experimentally observed quantity . gauge conditions ( [ ethrad])([efouad ] ) are first order equations by themselves and have some arbitrariness . therefore , to fix a solution uniquely , we must impose additional boundary conditions on the vielbein for any given problem . if the defect - free case , @xmath58 , @xmath163 , and the equilibrium equations are satisfied because the euler lagrange equations for ( [ elagfi ] ) are satisfied . in this and only in this case , we can introduce a displacement vector , and the elastic gauge reduces to the equations of nonlinear elasticity theory . in the presence of defects , a displacement field does not exist , and the elastic gauge simply defines the vielbein . in choosing the free energy functional , we required that the conditions @xmath116 and @xmath58 satisfy the euler lagrange equations . this is important because otherwise we would obtain an additional condition on the displacement vector ( the euler lagrange equations ) besides the elasticity theory equations following from the elastic gauge . we stress an important point once again . in the geometric theory of defects , we assume that there is a preferred laboratory coordinate system in which measurements are made . this coordinate system is related to the medium without defects and elastic stresses and corresponds to the flat euclidean space @xmath4 . gauge conditions ( [ eonead ] ) , ( [ etwoad ] ) and ( [ ethrad ] ) , ( [ efouad ] ) are written precisely in this euclidean space @xmath4 and contain a measurable quantity , the poisson ratio @xmath164 . this property essentially distinguishes the geometric theory of defects from the models of gravity in which all coordinate systems are considered equivalent . the elastic gauge is used to fix diffeomorphisms . the expression for the free energy in ( [ elagfi ] ) is also invariant under local @xmath0 rotations , and they must also be fixed . for this , we recently proposed the lorentz gauge for the connection @xcite @xmath165 this gauge is written in the laboratory cartesian coordinate system and has deep physical meaning . that is , let disclinations be absent ( @xmath163 ) . then the @xmath0 connection is a pure gauge : @xmath166 in this case , the lorentz gauge reduces to the principal chiral @xmath0-field equations @xmath167 for the spin structure @xmath92 . principal chiral field models ( see , e.g. , [ 6468 ] ) for different groups and in a different number of dimensions attract much interest in mathematical physics because they admit solutions of topological soliton types and find broad applications in physics . thus , the lorentz gauge ( [ elorga ] ) means the following . in the absence of disclinations , equations of equilibrium are identically satisfied , and there exists a field @xmath70 that satisfies equations for the principal chiral field . by this we mean that the spin structure of the medium is described by the model of the principal chiral field in the defect - free case . the principal chiral field model is not the only one that can be used for fixing local rotations . the skyrme model @xcite can also be used for this purpose . the euler lagrange equations for this model are not difficult to rewrite in terms of the @xmath0 connection and use as the gauge conditions . there are other models for spin structures . for describing the distribution of magnetic moments in ferromagnets or the director field in liquid crystals , one uses the expression for the free energy depending on the vector @xmath78-field itself @xcite . lately , much attention is paid to the faddeev model of the @xmath78-field @xcite . the question whether there are gauge conditions on the @xmath0 connection that yield these models in the absence of disclinations is unanswered at present . thus , we pose the following problem in the geometric theory of defects : to find the solution of the euler lagrange equations for free energy ( [ elagfi ] ) that satisfies the elastic gauge for the vielbein and the lorentz gauge for the @xmath0 connection . in sections [ swedie ] and [ swegeo ] , we solve this problem for the wedge dislocation in the framework of the classical elasticity theory and the geometric theory of defects , respectively , and afterwards compare the obtained results . in the preceeding section , we used the elasticity theory and the principal chiral @xmath0-field model to fix the invariance of free energy ( [ elagfi ] ) in the geometric theory of defects . this is not a unique possibility , because other models may be used for gauge fixing . in the present section , we show how another model asymmetric elasticity theory can be used for fixing diffeomorphisms and local rotations . at the beginning of the last century , the cosserat brothers developed the theory of elastic media , every point of which is characterized not only be its position but also by its orientation in space @xcite , i.e. , a vielbein is specified at every point ( fig.[fcosme ] ) . .45 from physical standpoint , this means that every atom in the crystalline structure is not a point but an extended object having orientation . in this case , the stress tensor is no longer a symmetric tensor , and the corresponding theory is called the asymmetric elasticity theory . contemporary exposition of this approach is given in @xcite . in the present section , we show that the asymmetric theory of elasticity is naturally incorporated into the geometric theory of defects . the main variables in the asymmetric theory of elasticity are the displacement vector @xmath42 and the rotation angle @xmath168 . the direction of the pseudovector @xmath74 coincides with the rotation axis of the medium element and its length is equal to the angle of rotation . the angle of rotation discussed in section [ sdiscl ] is dual to the spin structure field @xmath92 : @xmath169 . the cosserat medium is characterized by the stress tensor @xmath170 ( the density of forces acting on the surface with normal @xmath171 in the direction @xmath172 ) and the torque stress tensor @xmath173 ( the density of torques acting on the surface with normal @xmath171 in the direction @xmath172 ) . the cosserat medium is in equilibrium if forces and torques are balanced at every point , @xmath174 where @xmath20 and @xmath175 are the densities of nonelastic external forces and torques . as a consequence of eqn ( [ emofor ] ) , the stress tensor is symmetric if and only if the condition @xmath176 is satisfied . the displacement field and rotation angle uniquely define the deformation tensor @xmath177 and the twist tensor @xmath178 : @xmath179 in general , the deformation and twist tensors have no symmetry in their indices . hook s law in the cosserat medium is changed to two linear relations connecting the stress and torque tensors with the deformation and twist tensors , @xmath180}+{\lambda}{\delta}_{ij}\e_k{}^k , \\ \label{esizkr } \mu_{ij}&=2\g\kappa_{\lbrace ij\rbrace}+2\e\kappa_{[ij ] } + { \beta}{\delta}_{ij}\kappa_k{}^k,\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath181 are the lam coefficients , and @xmath182 are four new elastic constants characterizing the medium . braces and square brackets denote symmetrization and antisymmetrization of indices , respectively . in the case where @xmath183 the deformation tensor is symmetric and has the previous form ( [ edefte ] ) . equation ( [ emofor ] ) , together with ( [ estrte ] ) and ( [ esizkr ] ) , then reduces to the equation @xmath184 the first term vanishes as a consequence of eqn ( [ eqsepu ] ) . thus , for spin structure ( [ eresye ] ) and @xmath185 we return to the symmetric elasticity theory . equations ( [ enewfo ] ) , ( [ emofor ] ) , ( [ estrte ] ) , and ( [ esizkr ] ) , together with the boundary conditions , define the equilibrium state of cosserat media . we now show how this model is included in the geometric theory . first , we note that in the absence of defects ( @xmath58 , @xmath116 ) , the fields @xmath11 and @xmath70 exist . then the vielbein and the @xmath0 connection are defined by the deformation and twist tensors in the linear approximation : @xmath186 we note that relations ( [ edeizk ] ) can be regarded as equations for the displacement vector and rotation angle . the corresponding integrability conditions were obtained in @xcite . these integrability conditions are the linear approximations of equalities @xmath58 and @xmath116 defining the absence of defects . if nonelastic forces and torques are absent ( @xmath146 , @xmath185 ) , then the asymmetric theory of elasticity reduces to second - order equations for the displacement vector and rotation angle : @xmath187 we rewrite these equations for the vielbein and @xmath0 connection @xmath188 of course , these are not the only equations that coincide with eqns ( [ eqtrfi ] ) and ( [ eqstco ] ) in the linear approximation . at present , we do not have arguments for the unique choice . the derived nonlinear equations of the asymmetric elasticity theory can be used as gauge conditions in the geometric theory of defects . here , we have six equations for fixing diffeomorphisms ( three parameters ) and local @xmath0 rotations ( three parameters ) . thus , the asymmetric theory of elasticity is naturally embedded in the geometric theory of defects . in section [ sfixga ] , we considered the elastic gauge for the vielbein and the lorentz gauge for the @xmath0 connection . in this case , the spin structure variables do not interact with elastic deformations when defects are absent . in the asymmetric elasticity theory , the elastic stresses directly influence the spin structure and vice versa . .45 by wedge dislocation , we understand an elastic medium that is topologically the euclidean space @xmath4 without the @xmath189 axis the core of dislocation , obtained in the following way . we consider the infinite elastic medium without defects and cut out the infinite wedge of angle @xmath190 . for definiteness , we assume that the edge of the wedge coincides with the @xmath191 axis ( fig.[fwedis ] ) . the edges of the cut are then moved symmetrically one to the other and glued together . after that , the medium moves to the equilibrium state under the action of elastic forces . if the wedge is cut out from the medium , then the angle is considered negative : @xmath192 . for positive @xmath193 , the wedge is added . thus , the elastic medium initially occupies a domain greater or lesser than the euclidean space @xmath4 , depending on the sign of the deficit angle @xmath193 ; in the cylindrical coordinates @xmath194 this domain is described by the inequalities @xmath195 we note that the wedge dislocation is often called disclination . in our approach , this term seems unnatural because the wedge dislocation is related to a nontrivial torsion . moreover , the term disclination is used for defects in the spin structure . we now proceed with the mathematical formulation of the problem for the wedge dislocation in the framework of elasticity theory . to avoid divergent expressions arising for infinite media , we suppose that the wedge dislocation is represented by the cylinder of a finite radius @xmath196 . this problem has translational symmetry along the @xmath191 axis and rotational symmetry in the @xmath197 plane . therefore , we use cylindrical coordinate system . let @xmath198 be the components of the displacement covector with respect to orthonormal basis in the cylindrical coordinate system . this covector satisfies the equilibrium equation following the substitution of ( [ ehook ] ) in eqn ( [ estati ] ) in domain ( [ ecylco ] ) , @xmath199 where @xmath200 is the covariant derivative for the flat euclidean metric in the considered coordinate system . for references , we write expressions for the divergence and laplacian for a covector field in the cylindrical coordinate system : @xmath201 taking the symmetry of the problem into account , we seek the solution of eqn ( [ qeeste ] ) in the form @xmath202 where @xmath203 and @xmath204 are two unknown functions depending only on the radius . we impose the boundary conditions : @xmath205 the first four equations are geometrical and correspond to the process of dislocation creation . the last condition has simple physical meaning : the absence of external forces at the boundary of the medium . the unknown function @xmath204 is found from the second to the last boundary condition ( [ ebocow ] ) @xmath206 straightforward substitution then shows that @xmath207 and @xmath191 components of equation of equilibrium ( [ qeeste ] ) are identically satisfied , and the radial component reduces to the equation @xmath208 the general solution of this equation is @xmath209 the constant of integration @xmath210 due to the boundary condition at zero . the constant @xmath211 is found from the last boundary condition in ( [ ebocow ] ) . finally , we obtain the known solution of the considered problem @xcite @xmath212 the letter @xmath213 in the expression for @xmath214 denotes the base of the natural logarithm . we note that the radial component of the displacement vector diverges as @xmath215 . this means that the description of the wedge dislocation requires considering a finite - radius cylinder . the linear elasticity theory is applicable for small relative displacements , which for a wedge dislocation are equal to @xmath216 this means that we are able to expect correct results for the displacement field for small deficit angles ( @xmath217 ) and near the boundary of the cylinder ( @xmath218 ) . we find the metric induced by the wedge dislocation in the linear approximation in the deficit angle @xmath193 . calculations can be performed using the general formulas ( [ emetri ] ) or the known expression for the variation of the form of the metric @xmath219 after simple calculations , we obtain the expression for the metric in the @xmath197 plane : @xmath220 this metric is compared with the metric obtained as the solution of three - dimensional einstein equations in section [ swegeo ] . wedge dislocations are relatively rarely met in nature because they require a much amount of a medium to be added or removed , resulting in a vast quantity of energy expenses . nevertheless , their study is of great importance because other linear dislocations can be expressed as a superposition of wedge dislocations . in this respect , wedge dislocations are elementary . we show this for an edge dislocation one of the most widely spread dislocations , as an example . an edge dislocation with the core coinciding with the @xmath191 axis is shown in fig.[feddis]_a_. directed to the dislocation axis ( _ a _ ) . edge dislocation as the dipole of two wedge dislocations with positive and negative deficit angles ( _ b_).[feddis],title="fig : " ] + it appears as the result of cutting the medium over the half - plane @xmath221 , @xmath222 , moving the lower edge of the cut towards the @xmath191 axis on a constant ( far from the core of the dislocation ) burgers vector @xmath33 , and subsequently gluing the edges . to find the displacement vector field for the edge dislocation , we may solve the corresponding boundary value problem for the equilibrium equations ( [ qeeste ] ) @xcite . however , we follow another way , knowing the explicit form of the displacement vector for a wedge dislocation . the edge dislocation is represented by the dipole of two wedge dislocations with positive , @xmath223 , and negative , @xmath190 , deficit angles as shown in fig.[feddis]_b_. we assume that the axes of the first and second wedge dislocations are parallel to the @xmath191 axis and intersect the @xmath197 plane at points with the respective coordinates @xmath224 and @xmath225 . the distance between the wedge dislocation axes is equal to @xmath226 . it follows from the expression for the displacement field ( [ ewedis ] ) that far away from the origin ( @xmath227 ) , the displacement field for the wedge dislocations has the following form in the first order in small @xmath193 and @xmath228 : @xmath229 , \\ u_y^{(1)}&\approx-\theta\left [ \frac{1 - 2\s}{2(1-\s)}(y - a){{\sf\,ln\,}}\frac{r - a{{\sf\,sin\,}}\vf}{{{\sf\,e}}r } + x\left(\vf-\frac{a{{\sf\,cos\,}}\vf}r\right)\right ] , \end{split } \\ \label{esewdi } \begin{split } u_x^{(2)}&\approx\phantom{-}\theta\left [ \frac{1 - 2\s}{2(1-\s)}x{{\sf\,ln\,}}\frac{r+a{{\sf\,sin\,}}\vf}{{{\sf\,e}}r } -(y+a)\left(\vf+\frac{a{{\sf\,cos\,}}\vf}r\right)\right ] , \\ u_y^{(2)}&\approx\phantom{-}\theta\left [ \frac{1 - 2\s}{2(1-\s)}(y+a){{\sf\,ln\,}}\frac{r+a{{\sf\,sin\,}}\vf}{{{\sf\,e}}r } + x\left(\vf+\frac{a{{\sf\,cos\,}}\vf}r\right)\right ] . \end{split}\end{aligned}\ ] ] it is sufficient to sum displacement fields ( [ efiwdi ] ) and ( [ esewdi ] ) to find the displacement field for the edge dislocation because the elasticity theory equations are linear . after simple calculations , up to the translation of the whole medium by a constant vector along the @xmath230 axis , we obtain @xmath231 , \\ u_y&=-b\left[\frac{1 - 2\s}{2(1-\s)}{{\sf\,ln\,}}\frac r{{{\sf\,e}}r } + \frac1{2(1-\s)}\frac{x^2}{x^2+y^2}\right ] , \end{split}\ ] ] where we have introduced the notation for the modulus of the burgers vector @xmath232 this result coincides with the expression for the displacement field obtained by direct solution of the elasticity theory equations @xcite . thus , we have shown that an edge dislocation is the dipole of two parallel wedge dislocations . we next find the metric induced by the edge dislocation . using formulas ( [ einmec ] ) , we obtain the metric in the @xmath197 plane in the linear approximation in @xmath193 and @xmath228 : @xmath233 we note that the induced metric for an edge dislocation does not depend on @xmath196 . in the absence of disclinations ( @xmath145 ) , the @xmath0 connection is a pure gauge , and equations of equilibrium for the @xmath0 connection ( [ econne ] ) are identically satisfied . in this case , the explicit form of the @xmath0 connection is uniquely determined by the spin structure @xmath70 . the field @xmath70 satisfies equations for the principal chiral field as a consequence of the lorentz gauge in ( [ elorga ] ) . solution of this system of equations defines the trivial @xmath0 connection . thus in the absence of disclinations , the problem is reduced to solution of the einstein equations for the vielbein in the elastic gauge and solution of the principal chiral field model for the spin structure . after that , we can compute the torsion tensor through the formulas ( [ ecurcv ] ) , which defines the surface density of the burgers vector . because disclinations are absent ( the curvature tensor is equal to zero ) , we have the space of absolute parallelism . the whole geometry is then defined by the vielbein @xmath55 , which uniquely defines the torsion tensor via ( [ ecurcv ] ) for a vanishing @xmath0 connection . here , we assume that a trivial @xmath0 connection is equal to zero . the vielbein @xmath55 satisfies the three - dimensional einstein equations with a euclidean signature metric , which follow from the expression for the free energy ( [ elagfi ] ) for @xmath163 , @xmath234 here , we have added the source of dislocations @xmath235 to the right hand side of einstein equations ( it is the energy - momentum tensor in gravity ) . we note that without a source of dislocations , the model would be trivial . indeed , the scalar curvature and ricci tensor are equal to zero : @xmath236 , @xmath237 for @xmath238 as a consequence of einstein equations ( [ eindis ] ) . then , the full curvature tensor without sources is also equal to zero because in three - dimensional space , it is in a one - to - one correspondence with ricci tensor ( [ ecurir ] ) . the vanishing of the full curvature tensor means the triviality of the model because defects are absent in this case . the similar statement in three - dimensional gravity is well known . it is usually formulated as : `` three - dimensional gravity does not describe dynamical , i.e. , propagating degrees of freedom '' . for our purposes , we have to find the solution of einstein equations ( [ eindis ] ) describing one wedge dislocation . the einstein equations are a system of nonlinear second - order partial differential equations . not too many exact solutions are known at present , even in a three - dimensional space . the remarkable exact solution describing an arbitrary static distribution of point particles is well known in three - dimensional gravity for the lorentz signature metric @xmath239 [ 7577 ] . we find this solution for the euclidean signature metric and show that it describes an arbitrary distribution of parallel wedge dislocations in the geometric theory of defects . hence , we first consider the more general case of an arbitrary number of wedge dislocations and then analyze in detail one wedge dislocation which is of interest to us . we do this deliberately because the solution in a more general case does not involve essential complications . at the same time , an arbitrary distribution of wedge dislocations is much more interesting for applications . for example , the edge dislocation was shown in the preceeding section to be represented by a dipole of two wedge dislocations of different signs . we consider elastic medium with arbitrary distributed but parallel wedge dislocations . we choose the coordinate system such that the @xmath189 axis is parallel to dislocations axes , and axes @xmath240 , @xmath241 are perpendicular to the @xmath191 axis . then the metric has the block - diagonal form @xmath242 where @xmath243 is a two - dimensional metric on the @xmath197 plane . a two - dimensional metric @xmath244 and a function @xmath245 are independent of @xmath191 due to translational symmetry along the @xmath191 axis . we can say this more simpler dropping the physical arguments . we consider the block - diagonal metric of form ( [ eqmetr ] ) , which has translational invariance along the @xmath191 axis . afterwards , we show that the corresponding solution of the einstein equations indeed describes an arbitrary distribution of parallel wedge dislocations . the curvature tensor for metric ( [ eqmetr ] ) has the components : @xmath246 where @xmath247 is the curvature tensor for the two - dimensional metric @xmath248 and @xmath249 is the two - dimensional covariant derivative with the christoffel symbols . we choose the source of dislocations as @xmath250 where @xmath251 is the two - dimensional @xmath48-function on the @xmath197 plane with the support at a point @xmath252 . the factor @xmath253 in front of the sum sign is due to the property of the @xmath48-function , which is not a function but a tensor density with respect to general coordinate transformations . we show later that the solution of the einstein equations with such a source describes @xmath254 parallel wedge dislocations with deficit angles @xmath255 , which intersect the @xmath197 plane at the points @xmath256 . in three - dimensional gravity this source corresponds to particles of masses @xmath257 , being at rest at the points @xmath258 . einstein equations ( [ eindis ] ) then reduce to four equations , @xmath259 where @xmath260 is the two - dimensional scalar curvature . the metric of form ( [ eqmetr ] ) is still invariant under coordinate transformations in the @xmath197 plane . using this residual symmetry , we fix the conformal gauge on the plane ( this is always possible locally ) @xmath261 where @xmath262 is some function . in the conformal gauge , eqn ( [ eeinon ] ) becomes @xmath263 for constant boundary conditions for @xmath264 on the boundary of the @xmath197 plane this equation has the unique solution @xmath265 . changing the scale of @xmath191 coordinate , we can set @xmath266 without loss of generality . then eqn ( [ eeintw ] ) reduces to the poisson equation @xmath267 which has the general solution @xmath268 thus the metric in the @xmath197 plane is @xmath269 where the polar coordinates @xmath270 cover the whole plane @xmath85 and not more ( this is important ! ) . any solution of the einstein equations is defined up to choosing the coordinate system because the equations are covariant . using this , we set @xmath271 , which is always possible by choosing the scale of @xmath272 . this is indeed the exact solution of the einstein equations describing arbitrary distribution of parallel wedge dislocations . this statement is made clear from the following consideration . we note that transition to a continuous distribution of dislocations in the geometric approach is simple . for this , we have to substitute a continuous distribution of sources in the right hand side of the einstein equations instead of @xmath48-sources . we consider one wedge dislocation with the source at the origin in more detail to show that metric ( [ edisco ] ) indeed describes an arbitrary distribution of wedge dislocations @xmath273 the corresponding metric ( [ edisco ] ) for @xmath271 is @xmath274 we pass to a new coordinate system @xmath275 in which the metric becomes euclidean @xmath276 but the range of the polar angle differs now from @xmath87 : @xmath277 , and covers the @xmath197 plane with removed or added angle @xmath223 . because the metric coincides with the euclidean one in the primed coordinate system @xmath278 , we have the euclidean plane with a removed or added wedge because the angle @xmath279 varies within the interval @xmath280 . the transformation to coordinates @xmath270 in ( [ ekoorv ] ) means the gluing of the edges of the wedge that has appeared , which produces a cone . therefore , both metrics ( [ eonwed ] ) and ( [ equlco ] ) describe the same geometric object conical singularity . the torsion and curvature tensors are obviously zero everywhere except at the origin . creation of a conical singularity coincides exactly with creation of the wedge dislocation in the geometric theory of defects . it is not difficult to show that general solution ( [ edisco ] ) describes an arbitrary distribution of conical singularities with deficit angles @xmath255 at points @xmath258 . thus , this solution describes an arbitrary distribution of parallel wedge dislocations . in the next section , we consider one wedge dislocation in detail . for this , we perform one more coordinate transformation @xmath281 metric ( [ equlco ] ) then becomes @xmath282 this is one more frequently used form of the metric for a conical singularity . we now consider a wedge dislocation from the geometric standpoint . from the qualitative standpoint , the creation of a wedge dislocation coincides with the definition of conical singularity . however , there is a quantitative difference because metric ( [ ecosth ] ) depends only on the deficit angle @xmath193 and can not coincide with the induced metric ( [ emewed ] ) obtained within the elasticity theory . the difference arises because we require the displacement vector in the equilibrium to satisfy equilibrium equations after removing the wedge and gluing its edges ( creating conical singularity ) in the elasticity theory . at the same time the @xmath197 plane for a conical singularity after the gluing can be deformed in an arbitrary way . formally , this manifests itself in that metric ( [ emewed ] ) obtained within the elasticity depends explicitly on the poisson ratio , which is absent in gravity theory . we proposed the elastic gauge for solving this problem @xcite . we choose elastic gauge ( [ efouad ] ) as the simplest one for a wedge dislocation . this problem can be solved in two ways . first , the gauge condition can be inserted in the einstein equations directly . second , we can find the solution in any suitable coordinate system and then find the coordinate transformation such that the gauge condition is satisfied . it is easier to follow the second way because the solution for the metric is known , eqn ( [ ecosth ] ) . the vielbein can be associated with metric ( [ ecosth ] ) as @xmath283 here , a hat over an index means that it corresponds to the orthonormal coordinate system , and an index without a hat is the coordinate one . components of this vielbein are the square roots of the corresponding metric components and therefore have the symmetric linear approximation ( [ etrsep ] ) . we transform the radial coordinate @xmath284 because a wedge dislocation is symmetric under rotations in the @xmath197 plane . after that transformation the vielbein components take the form @xmath285 where the prime denotes differentiation with respect to @xmath272 . we choose the vielbein corresponding to the euclidean metric as @xmath286 it defines the christoffel symbols @xmath287 and @xmath0 connection @xmath288 , which define the covariant derivative . we write only nontrivial components @xmath289 substitution of the vielbein into gauge condition ( [ efouad ] ) yields the euler differential equation for the transition function @xmath290 its general solution depends on two arbitrary constants @xmath291 , @xmath292 where the exponents @xmath293 are defined by the quadratic equation @xmath294 which has real roots for @xmath295 with different signs : positive root @xmath296 and negative @xmath297 . we recall that there are thermodynamical constraints @xmath149 on the poisson ratio @xcite . to fix the constants , we impose boundary conditions on the vielbein : @xmath298 the first boundary condition corresponds to the last boundary condition for displacement vector ( [ ebocow ] ) ( the absence of external forces on the surface of the cylinder ) , and the second one corresponds to the absence of the angular component of the deformation tensor at the core of dislocation . equations ( [ eborep ] ) define the values of integration constants @xmath299 the obtained vielbein defines the metric @xmath300 where @xmath301 this is the solution of the posed problem . the derived solution is valid for all deficit angles @xmath193 and for all @xmath302 . the obtained metric depends on three constants : @xmath193 , @xmath164 , and @xmath196 . the dependence on the deficit angle @xmath193 is due to its occurrence on the right hand side of einstein equations ( [ eindis ] ) . the dependence on the poisson ratio comes from elastic gauge ( [ efouad ] ) , and , finally , the dependence on the cylinder radius comes from boundary condition ( [ eborep ] ) . if a wedge dislocation is absent , then @xmath303 , @xmath304 , @xmath305 , and metric ( [ emeweg ] ) goes to the euclidean one @xmath306 , as expected . we compare metric ( [ emeweg ] ) obtained within the geometric approach with the induced metric from elasticity theory in eqn ( [ emewed ] ) . first , it has a simpler form . second , in the linear approximation in @xmath193 @xmath307 and metric ( [ emeweg ] ) can be easily shown to coincide precisely with metric ( [ emewed ] ) obtained within the elasticity theory . we see that induced metric ( [ emewed ] ) provides only the linear approximation for the metric obtained within the geometric theory of defects , which , in addition , has a simpler form . beyond the perturbation theory , we see essential differences . in particular , metric ( [ emewed ] ) is singular at the origin , whereas metric ( [ emeweg ] ) obtained beyound the perturbation theory is regular . the stress and deformation tensors are related by hook s law ( [ ehook ] ) . there is an experimental possibility to check formulas ( [ emeweg ] ) because the deformation tensor is the linear approximation for the induced metric . for this one has to measure the stress field for a single wedge dislocation . in this way , the geometric theory of defects can be experimentally confirmed or discarded . the problem of reconstruction of the displacement field for a given metric reduces to solution of differential equations ( [ emetri ] ) with metric ( [ emeweg ] ) on the right hand side and boundary conditions ( [ ebocow ] ) . we do not discuss this problem here . we note that in the geometric theory of defects , a complicated stage of finding the displacement vector where it exists is simply absent and is not necessary . two - dimensional metric ( [ emeweg ] ) describes the conical singularity in the elastic gauge . the relation between conical singularities and wedge dislocations was established in [ 22,7880 ] . in these papers , the metric was used in the other gauges ( coordinate systems ) . elastic oscillations in elastic media without defects are described by a time - dependent vector field @xmath308 that satisfies the wave equation ( see , e.g. , @xcite ) @xmath309 where dots denote differentiation with respect to time and @xmath60 is the mass density of medium , which is assumed to be constant . if the medium contains defects , then the metric of the space becomes nontrivial , @xmath310 . we assume that relative displacements for elastic oscillations are much smaller than stresses induced by defects : @xmath311 then , in the first approximation , we assume that elastic oscillations propagate in a riemannian space with a nontrivial metric induced by dislocations . here , we discard changes in the metric due to elastic oscillation themselves . therefore , for elastic oscillations we postulate the following equation , which is a covariant generalization of ( [ efleld ] ) for spatial variables : @xmath312 where @xmath11 denote components of displacement vector field with respect to an orthonormal space basis @xmath313 ( see the appendix ) , @xmath314 is the covariant laplace beltrami operator built for the vielbein @xmath55 , and @xmath315 is the covariant derivative . the explicit form of the covariant derivative of the displacement field is @xmath316 where @xmath317 is the @xmath0 connection built for zero torsion . we note that the displacement vector field describing elastic oscillations is not the total displacement vector field of points of a medium with dislocations . it was already said in section [ sdislo ] that the displacement field for dislocations can be introduced only in those regions of media where defects are absent . if we denote it by @xmath318 , then the total displacement field in these regions is defined by the sum @xmath319 . there , the vielbein is defined only by the displacement field for dislocations @xmath320 . we note that the smallness of relative deformations ( [ edueco ] ) is also meaningful in those regions of space where displacements @xmath318 are not defined . we now decompose the displacement field covariantly into transversal @xmath321 and longitudinal parts @xmath322 , @xmath323 which are defined by the relations @xmath324 the decomposition of a vector field into longitudinal and transversal parts in three - dimensional space with an accuracy up a constant is unique . we recall that latin indices are lowered with the help of kronecker symbols , @xmath325 , and this operation commutes with covariant differentiation . equation ( [ edelop ] ) can be rewritten as @xmath326 because transformation of latin indices into greek ones commutes with the covariant differentiation , and the christoffel symbols are symmetrical in the first two indices . the last equality means that the 1-form @xmath327 is closed . it is easily confirmed that eqn ( [ ephops ] ) for elastic oscillations is equivalent to two independent equations for transverse and longitudinal oscillations , @xmath328 where @xmath329 are the squares of sound velocities for transverse and longitudinal oscillations . particles arising after the secondary quantization of eqns ( [ eelaos ] ) are called phonons in solids . therefore , strictly speaking , the problem of scattering of phonons on dislocations is a quantum mechanical one . in the present review , we consider only classical aspects of this problem . wave equations ( [ eelaos ] ) contain second and first derivatives of the displacement field . the latter are contained in the covariant laplace beltrami operator @xmath330 . the terms with second derivatives can be written in the four - dimensional form @xmath331 where @xmath332 is the inverse metric to @xmath333 where @xmath334 is either the transverse or longitudinal sound velocity . above , we used the following notations . four - dimensional coordinates are denoted by greek letters from the beginning of the alphabet @xmath335 , and letters from the middle of greek alphabet denote only space coordinates @xmath336 . this rule can be easily remembered by the following inclusions @xmath337 and @xmath338 . christoffel symbols ( [ etigam ] ) can be computed for four - dimensional metric ( [ etigas ] ) , which defines a system of ordinary nonlinear equations for extremals @xmath339 ( lines of extremal lengths that coincide with geodesics in riemannian geometry ) , where dots denote differentiation with respect to canonical parameter @xmath340 . for the block - diagonal metric in ( [ etigas ] ) , these equations decompose : @xmath341 where @xmath342 are the three - dimensional christoffel symbols constructed for the three - dimensional metric @xmath156 which , as we recall , depends only on spatial coordinates for a static distribution of defects . let @xmath343 be an arbitrary extremal in four - dimensional space - time . for metric ( [ etigas ] ) , its natural projection on space @xmath344 is also an extremal but now for the spatial part of the metric @xmath156 . equations for extremals ( [ efextr ] ) , ( [ esextr ] ) are invariant under linear transformations of the canonical parameter @xmath340 . therefore , the canonical parameter can be identified with time , @xmath345 , without loss of generality as a consequence of eqn ( [ efextr ] ) . we assume that a particle moves in space along an extremal @xmath346 with velocity @xmath347 . this means that @xmath348 the length of the tangent vector to the corresponding extremal @xmath349 in four - dimensional space - time is then equal to @xmath350 hence , if the particle moves in space along extremal with velocity less than , equal to , or greater than the speed of sound , then its world line in space - time is timelike , null , or spacelike , respectively . we return now to propagation of phonons in media with defects . as in geometric optics @xcite , there are useful notions of wave fronts and rays in the analysis of the asymptotic form of solutions for wave equations ( [ eelaos ] ) . we do not consider mathematical aspects of this approach , which is nontrivial and complicated @xcite , and instead give only a physical description . in the eikonal ( high frequency ) approximation , phonons propagate along rays coinciding with null extremals for the four - dimensional metric @xmath248 . forms of rays , which are identified with trajectories of phonons , are defined by the three - dimensional metric @xmath156 . this means that in the eikonal approximation , trajectories of transverse and longitudinal phonons in a medium with defects are the same and are defined by eqn ( [ esextr ] ) . the difference reduces to the velocities of propagation for transverse and longitudinal phonons being different and equal to @xmath351 and @xmath352 , respectively . calculations in the present section coincide , in fact , with the analysis performed in section 3 of @xcite . the difference is that in what follows , we use the metric written in the elastic gauge . this is important because we assume that trajectories of phonons seen in an experiment coincide with extremals for the metric precisely in this gauge . in the presence of one wedge dislocation , the space metric in the cylindrical coordinates @xmath194 is @xmath353 0 & { \displaystyle\dfrac{\raise-.7ex\hbox{${\alpha}^2$}}{\g^2 } \dfrac{\raise-.7ex\hbox{$r^{2\g}$}}{r^{2\g-2 } } } & 0 \\[2 mm ] 0 & 0 & 1 \end{pmatrix}\ ] ] where the nontrivial part of the metric in the @xmath270 plane was obtain earlier [ see eqn ( [ emeweg ] ) ] . here , we change @xmath296 to @xmath354 for simplicity of notation . the inverse metric is also diagonal , @xmath355 0 & { \displaystyle\dfrac{\raise-.7ex\hbox{$\g^2$}}{{\alpha}^2 } \dfrac{\raise-.7ex\hbox{$r^{2\g-2}$}}{r^{2\g } } } & 0 \\[2 mm ] 0 & 0 & 1 \end{pmatrix}\ ] ] christoffel symbols for metric ( [ ewemep ] ) are calculated according to formulas ( [ etigam ] ) . as a result , only four christoffel symbols differ from zero : @xmath356 in the preceeding section , we showed that in the eikonal approximation , phonons propagate along extremals @xmath346 defined by eqns ( [ esextr ] ) . in the case considered here , these equations are @xmath357 where the dot denotes differentiation with respect to time @xmath358 . it follows from the last equation that phonons move along the @xmath191 axis with constant velocity , which corresponds to translational invariance along @xmath191 . this means that scattering on a wedge dislocation is reduced to a two - dimensional problem in the @xmath270 plane , as could be expected . the system of equations for @xmath359 and @xmath360 in ( [ extrfw ] ) and ( [ extvfw ] ) can be explicitly integrated . for this , we find two first integrals . first , for any metric , there is the integral for equations for extremals @xmath361 we then have the equality @xmath362 second , the invariance of the metric under rotations about the @xmath191 axis results in the existence of an additional integral . it is constructed as follows . there is a killing vector corresponding to the invariance of the metric , which in cylindrical coordinates has the simple form @xmath363 . straightforward verification proves that @xmath364 in the considered case , this results in the identity @xmath365 we analyze the form of an extremal @xmath366 . first derivatives can be found from eqns ( [ efinte ] ) and ( [ einsew ] ) @xmath367 admissible values of the radial coordinate @xmath272 for which the expression under the square root is nonnegative are to be found later . from the above equations , we obtain the equation defining the form of nonradial ( @xmath368 ) extremals @xmath369 this equation can be easily integrated , and we finally obtain explicit formulas defining the form of an extremal : @xmath370=1,\ ] ] where @xmath371 the constant @xmath372 is positive and defines the minimal distance at which an extremal approaches the core of the dislocation , i.e. , @xmath373 . only for these values of @xmath272 is the expression under the root in eqn ( [ eqfexw ] ) nonnegative . the integration constant @xmath374 is arbitrary and corresponds to the invariance of the problem under rotations around the core of dislocation . equations for extremals ( [ extrfw ] ) and ( [ extvfw ] ) also have degenerate solutions : @xmath375 these extremals correspond to the radial motion of phonons . such trajectories are unstable in the sense that there are no nonradial extremals near them . we note that circular extremals @xmath376 are absent as a consequence of eqn ( [ extrfw ] ) , although integrals of motion ( [ efinte ] ) and ( [ einsew ] ) admit such a solution . this is because eqn ( [ extrfw ] ) was multiplied by @xmath377 in deriving first integral ( [ efinte ] ) . we now analyze the form of nonradial extremals ( [ efoexe ] ) . for any extremal , the radius @xmath272 decreases first from infinity to the minimal value @xmath372 and then increases from @xmath372 to infinity . we can assume here without loss of generality that the argument of sine in ( [ efoexe ] ) varies from 0 to @xmath89 . thus , we obtain the range of changes of the polar angle @xmath378 this means that the extremal comes from infinity at the angle @xmath379 and goes to infinity at the angle @xmath380 . this corresponds to the scattering angle @xmath381 we note that the scattering angle depends only on the deficit angle @xmath193 and does not depend on the elastic properties of the medium . the scattering angle has a simple physical interpretation . for positive @xmath193 , the medium is cut and moved apart . a wedge of the same medium without elastic stresses is inserted in the cavity that has appeared . afterwards , gluing is performed , and the wedge is compressed . the compression coefficient for all circles centered at the origin is equal to @xmath382 due to symmetry considerations . therefore , the scattering angle equals half the deficit angle times the compression coefficient , @xmath383 for @xmath303 , the dislocation is absent , and the scattering angle is equal to zero . for positive deficit angles , the scattering angle is positive , which corresponds to repulsion of phonons from the wedge dislocation . corresponding extremals are shown in fig.[fexwpo]_a _ , and they have asymptotes as @xmath384 . _ extremals for the wedge dislocation with a positive ( @xmath385 ) deficit angle . two extremals and their reflections with respect to the @xmath8 axis are shown for the same @xmath385 but different @xmath372 . _ ( b ) _ extremals for the wedge dislocation with a negative ( @xmath386 ) deficit angle . two extremals are shown for the same @xmath372 but different deficit angles @xmath193.,title="fig : " ] + we note that for positive deficit angles , no two points on the @xmath270 plane can be connected by an extremal , i.e. , there is a domain to the right of the wedge dislocation that can not be reached at all by a phonon falling from the left . all extremals shown in the figures in the present section are calculated numerically . the values of the deficit angle @xmath193 , the scattering angle @xmath387 , and the minimal distance @xmath372 to the dislocation axis are shown in the figures . for definiteness , we choose @xmath388 corresponding to the fall of phonons from the left . for negative deficit angles the scattering angle is negative and is defined by the same formulas ( [ escang ] ) . this corresponds to the attraction of phonons to the dislocation axis . in fig.[fexwpo]_b _ , we show two extremals with the same parameter @xmath372 but for two dislocations with different deficit angles . for @xmath389 , the scattering angle varies from 0 to @xmath87 ( fig.[fexwpo]_b _ ) . for @xmath390 , the scattering angle is equal to @xmath87 . we note that for negative deficit angles , phonons have no asymptotes as @xmath384 , i.e. , for @xmath390 , phonons fall from infinity ( @xmath391 ) and return to the infinity ( @xmath392 ) . when the deficit angle is sufficiently small ( @xmath393 ) , a phonon makes one or several rotations around the dislocation and then goes to infinity . examples of such trajectories are shown in figs.[fwede2][fwede4 ] . for @xmath394 , an extremal makes one rotation around the dislocation and then goes forward in the original direction . the blown - up part of the trajectory is shown in the square to the right.,title="fig : " ] + for @xmath395 , an extremal makes two turns around the dislocation and then goes back . the blown - up part of the trajectory is shown in the square to the right.,title="fig : " ] + for @xmath396 , an extremal makes two and a half rotations around the dislocation and then goes forward in the original direction . subsequent blown - up parts of the trajectory are shown in the two squares to the right.,title="fig : " ] + we consider the asymptotic behavior of nonradial extremals as @xmath397 . as a consequence of eqn ( [ erdotf ] ) , far from the core of dislocation , we obtain @xmath398 it follows from this equation that the dependence of the radius on time is the same as for radial extremals ( [ eradex ] ) . because @xmath399 , an infinite value of @xmath272 corresponds to an infinite value of time @xmath358 . this means that the @xmath270 plane with the given metric is complete at @xmath384 . the origin ( the core of dislocation ) is a singular point . only radial extremals fall into it at a finite moment of time . integrals of motion ( [ efinte ] ) and ( [ einsew ] ) have simple physical meaning . equations for extremals ( [ esextr ] ) follow from the variational principle for the lagrangian @xmath400 describing motion of a free massless point particle in a nontrivial metric @xmath401 . here , the metric is considered as a given external field and is not varied . the energy corresponding to this integral is equal to @xmath402 if the metric , as in our case , does not depend on time explicitly , then the energy is conserved ( @xmath403 ) and its numerical value for the motion in the @xmath270 plane is proportional to the integral of motion @xmath404 . for a wedge dislocation , the metric is independent on the polar angle @xmath207 , and the lagrangian is invariant under rotations : @xmath405 . by the noether theorem , the angular momentum conservation law corresponds to this invariance , @xmath406 as a consequence , the constant of integration @xmath407 is proportional to the angular momentum . we note that the behavior of extremals differs qualitatively from trajectories of point particles moving in flat space with euclidean metric @xmath408 in an external potential field @xmath409 . it can be easily shown that trajectories of point particles described by the lagrangian @xmath410 can not coincide with extremals ( [ esextr ] ) for any function @xmath409 . in the present section , we have showed how the problem of scattering of phonons on the simplest wedge dislocation is solved in the geometric approach . the results of calculations can be checked experimentally . the more general problem of scattering of phonons on an arbitrary distribution of wedge dislocations , including the edge dislocation and continuous distribution of dislocations , is solved in @xcite . solution of this problem in the geometric approach is simpler than in the framework of classical elasticity theory , where we have to solve partial differential equations with complicated boundary conditions . in @xcite , calculations were performed in the conformal gauge for the metric . for comparison with experiment , the results must be recalculated in the elastic gauge , which has physical meaning in the geometric approach . we consider elastic media with one wedge dislocation containing one atom of impurity or vacancy . if we consider the influence of impurity on the distribution of elastic stresses small compared with the elastic stresses induced by the dislocation itself , then the motion of the impurity can be considered as taking place in three - dimensional space with the nontrivial metric ( [ emeweg ] ) . in the geometric approach , we assume that the potential energy of the interaction equals zero , and all interactions are due to changes in the kinetic energy , which depends explicitly on the nontrivial metric . we solve the corresponding quantum mechanical problem . we consider bounded states of impurity moving inside a cylinder of radius @xmath196 in the presence of a wedge dislocation . we assume that the cylinder axis coincides with the core of dislocation . the stationary schrdinger equation is @xmath411 where @xmath412 is the plank constant and @xmath254 , @xmath413 , and @xmath414 are mass , wave function , and energy of the impurity . the nontriviality of the interaction with dislocation reduces to the nontrivial laplace beltrami operator @xmath415 where the metric was found earlier [ see eqn ( [ emeweg ] ) ] , and @xmath416 . taking the symmetry of the problem into account , we solve the schrdinger equation ( [ eshrse ] ) in cylindrical coordinates by the separation of variables . let @xmath417 where we have the two following possibilities for the normalization function @xmath418 . if the impurity moves freely along the @xmath191 axis with momentum @xmath419 , then @xmath420 if its motion is restricted by the planes @xmath421 and @xmath422 , then @xmath423 in what follows , we drop the integer - valued subscript @xmath424 indicating the restricted motion , having both possibilities in mind . the condition for the constant @xmath425 ( the eigenvalue of the projection of the momentum on the @xmath191 axis ) to be an integer appears due to the periodicity condition @xmath426 then for the radial wave function , @xmath427 we then obtain the equation @xmath428 we introduce the new radial coordinate @xmath429 this is the transformation in ( [ eftrra ] ) and ( [ ecoifr ] ) up to a constant . the radial equation is then @xmath430 where @xmath431 this is the bessel equation . we solve it with the boundary condition @xmath432 which corresponds to the motion of an impurity inside the cylinder with an impenetrable boundary . the general solution of the bessel equation ( [ erashe ] ) is @xmath433 where @xmath434 and @xmath435 are bessel and neumann functions of order @xmath436 @xcite . the boundedness of the wave function on the axis of the cylinder requires @xmath437 . the constants of integration @xmath438 are found from the normalization condition @xmath439 boundary condition ( [ eboube ] ) yields the equation for @xmath440 @xmath441 which defines the energy levels of bounded states . it is well known that for real @xmath442 and @xmath443 , this equation has only real roots . positive roots form an infinite countable set and all of them are simple @xcite . this provides the inequality @xmath444 we label the positive roots of eqn ( [ eqenlv ] ) by the index @xmath445 ( principle quantum number ) : @xmath446 . then the spectrum of bounded states is @xmath447 for large radii @xmath448 and @xmath449 we have the asymptotic form : @xmath450 as a result , we obtain explicit expression for the spectrum @xmath451 in the absence of defect , @xmath304 , @xmath452 , @xmath453 , and the radial functions @xmath454 are expressed through the bessel functions of integer order @xmath455 . in this case , the spectrum of bounded states depends only on the sizes of the cylinder . in the presence of the wedge dislocation , bessel functions have a noninteger order in general . in this case , the spectrum of energy levels acquires dependence on the deficit angle @xmath193 and the poisson ratio @xmath456 characterizing elastic properties of the medium . if the mass of impurity and vacancy is defined by integral ( [ emass ] ) , then @xmath457 for impurity and the energy eigenvalues are positive . for vacancy , @xmath458 and the energy eigenvalues are negative . in this case , the energy spectrum is not bounded from below , which causes serious problems for physical interpretation . it seems that one has to insert in the schrdinger equation not the bare mass ( [ emass ] ) but the effective mass , with the contribution of elastic stresses arising around a vacancy taken into account . this question presently remains unanswered . the presentation in the present section is close to that in @xcite . in contrast to that paper , we use the elastic gauge for the metric . therefore , our results depend not only on the deficit angle of a wedge dislocation but also on the elastic properties of the medium . calculations of the energy levels of an impurity in the field of a wedge dislocation are actually equivalent to the calculations of bounded - state energies in the aharonov bohm effect @xcite ( see reviews @xcite ) . the difference reduces only to changing the order of the bessel functions , @xmath459 where @xmath460 is the magnetic flux quantum and @xmath461 is the electron charge . the considered example shows how the influence of the presence of defects is taken into account in the geometric approach in the first approximation . if calculations in some problem were performed in elastic media without defects , then to take the influence of defects into account we have to replace the flat euclidean metric with a nontrivial metric describing the given distribution of defects . this problem may appear complicated mathematically because we have to solve the three - dimensional einstein equations to find the metric . however , there are no principal difficulties : the effect of dislocations reduces to a change in the metric . the geometric theory of defects describes defects in elastic media ( dislocations ) and defects in the spin structure ( disclinations ) from a single point of view . this model can be used for describing single defects as well as their continuous distribution . the geometric theory of defects is based on the riemann - cartan geometry . by definition , torsion and curvature tensors are equal to surface densities of burgers and frank vectors , respectively . equations defining the static distribution of defects are covariant and have the same form as equations of gravity models with dynamical torsion . to choose a solution uniquely , one must fix the coordinate system . for this , the elastic gauge for the vielbein and the lorentz gauge for the @xmath0 connection are proposed . in the defect - free case the displacement vector field and the field of the spin structure can be introduced . equations of equilibrium are then identically satisfied , and the gauge conditions reduce to the equations of elasticity theory and the principal chiral @xmath0-field . in this way , the geometric theory of defects incorporates elasticity theory and the model of principal chiral field . in a certain sense , the elastic gauge represents the equations of the nonlinear elasticity theory . nonlinearity is introduced in elasticity theory in two ways . first , the deformation tensor is defined through the induced metric @xmath462 instead of being defined by linear relation ( [ edefte ] ) . then the stress tensor is given by an infinite series in the displacement vector . second , hook s law can be modified assuming nonlinear dependence of the stress tensor on the deformation tensor . hence , the elastic gauge condition is the equations of the nonlinear elasticity theory where the deformation tensor is assumed to be defined through the induced metric and hook s law is kept linear . a generalization to the nonlinear dependence of the deformation tensor on the stress tensor is obvious . as an example , we considered the wedge dislocation from the standpoint of the elasticity theory and the geometric theory of defects . we showed that the elasticity theory reproduces only the linear approximation of the geometric approach . in contrast to the induced metric obtained within the exact solution of the linear elasticity theory , the expression for the metric obtained as the exact solution of the einstein equations in the elastic gauge is simpler and is defined on the whole space and for all deficit angles . the obtained expression for the metric can be checked experimentally . two problems are considered as applications of the geometric theory of defects . the first is the scattering of phonons on a wedge dislocation . in the eikonal approximation , the problem is reduced to the analysis of extremals for the metric describing a given dislocation . equations for extremals are integrated explicitly , and the scattering angle is found . the second of the considered problems is the construction of the wave functions and energy spectrum of impurity in the presence of a wedge dislocation . this requires solving the schrdinger equation . this problem is mathematically equivalent to solving the schrdinger equation for bound states in the aharonov bohm effect @xcite . the explicit dependence of the spectrum on the deficit angle and elastic properties of the medium is found in the presence of a wedge dislocation . the geometric theory of static distribution of defects can also be constructed for membranes , i.e. , on the plane @xmath85 . for this , one has to consider the euclidean version @xcite of two - dimensional gravity with torsion [ 8890 ] . this model is favored by its integrability [ 9194 ] . the developed geometric construction in the theory of defects can be inverted , and we can consider the gravitational interaction of masses in the universe as the interaction of defects in elastic ether . point masses and cosmic strings @xcite then correspond to point defects ( vacancies and impurities ) and wedge dislocations . in this interpretation of gravity , we have a question about the elastic gauge , which has direct physical meaning in the geometric theory of defects . if we take the standpoint of the theory of defects , then the elastic properties of ether correspond to some value of the poisson ratio , which can be measured experimentally . it seems interesting and important for applications to include time in the considered static approach for describing motion of defects in the medium . such a model is lacking at present . from the geometric standpoint this generalization can be easily performed , at least in principle . it is sufficient to change the euclidean space @xmath4 to the minkowski space @xmath463 and to write a suitable lagrangian quadratic in curvature and torsion , which corresponds to the true gravity model with torsion . one of the arising problems is the physical interpretation of the additional components of the vielbein and lorentz connection that contain the time index . the physical meaning of the time component of the vielbein @xmath464 is simple this is the velocity of a point of the medium . this interpretation is natural from the physical standpoint because the motion of continuously distributed dislocations means a flowing of the medium . in fact , the liquid can be imagined as the elastic media with a continuous distribution of moving dislocations . this means that the dynamical theory of defects based on the riemann cartan geometry must include hydrodynamics . it is not clear at present how this can happen . physical interpretation of the other components of the vielbein and the lorentz connection with the time index also remains unclear . the author is sincerely grateful to i v volovich for numerous discussions on the problems considered in this paper . this work is supported by the rfbr ( grant 05 - 01 - 00884 ) and the program of support for leading academic schools ( grant as-1542.2003.1 ) . in the appendix , we briefly present the main facts from differential geometry and introduce the notation used in this review . the description is given in local coordinates , which is sufficient for our purposes . we recommend @xcite as a textbook on differential geometry . if the metric @xmath465 and the affine connection @xmath466 are given , then we say that the geometry is defined on a differentiable manifold @xmath467 , @xmath468 . we assume that all fields on the manifold are given by smooth @xmath469 functions except , possibly , some singular points , and do not stipulate that in what follows . we also assume that the manifold @xmath467 is topologically trivial , i.e. , diffeomorphic to the euclidean space @xmath470 . in a local coordinate system @xmath37 , @xmath471 , the metric is given by a nondegenerate symmetric covariant second rank tensor @xmath401 , which defines the scalar product of vector fields @xmath472 , @xmath473 @xmath474 in general , the scalar product may be not positive definite . if the scalar product is positive definite , we say that a riemannian metric is given on a manifold . by definition , the metric is a covariant tensor field , i.e. , it transforms under coordinate changes @xmath41 by the tensor law @xmath475 this means that the scalar product of vector fields @xmath476 is a scalar field . in a similar way , contractions with the metric @xmath156 and its inverse @xmath157 , @xmath477 , allows one to build scalar fields from higher - rank tensors or to lower their rank . the metric is also used for lowering and raising of tensor indices . an affine connection on a manifold in a local coordinate system is given by the set of coefficients @xmath478 that transform under the diffeomorphisms as @xmath479 these coefficients do not constitute a tensor field because of the presence of an inhomogeneous term in ( [ econts ] ) . an affine connection on a manifold defines covariant derivatives of tensor fields . in particular , covariant derivatives of a vector field and 1-form @xmath480 have the form @xmath481 the covariant derivative of a scalar field coincides with the partial derivative @xmath482 . the covariant derivative of higher - rank tensors is built in a similar way and contains one term with the plus and minus sign for each contravariant and covariant index , respectively . one can easily check that the covariant derivative of a tensor of an arbitrary type @xmath483 is a tensor field of type @xmath484 , i.e. , it has one additional covariant index . we note that the covariant derivative of a product of tensor fields may contain arbitrary contractions of indices . for example , @xmath485 because the inhomogeneous term in ( [ econts ] ) is symmetric in indices @xmath486 and @xmath487 the antisymmetric part of the affine connection @xmath488}{}^\rho$ ] forms a tensor field of type @xmath489 , which is called the torsion tensor @xmath490 in general , the connection @xmath491 has no symmetry in its indices and is not related to the metric @xmath156 in any way because these notions define different geometric operations on a manifold @xmath467 . we then say that the affine geometry is given on @xmath467 . we emphasize that the metric and the affine connection are defined arbitrarily and are completely independent geometric notions . therefore , in the construction of physical models , they can be considered independent fields having different physical interpretations . if the affine geometry is given on a manifold , then we can construct the nonmetricity tensor @xmath492 that is by definition equal to the covariant derivative of the metric : @xmath493 by construction , the nonmetricity tensor is symmetric with respect to the permutation of the last two indices : @xmath494 . we note that we need both objects , the metric and the connection to define the nonmetricity . thus , for a given metric and connection we constructed two tensor fields : the torsion and the nonmetricity tensor . we prove that for a given metric , torsion , and nonmetricity tensor we can uniquely reconstruct the corresponding affine connection . equation ( [ enonme ] ) can always be solved for the connection @xmath466 . indeed , the linear combination @xmath495 yields the expression for the affine connection with all lowered indices : @xmath496 the right hand side of this equality is symmetric in the indices @xmath19 and @xmath436 except one term @xmath497 , and this is in accord with the definition of the torsion tensor ( [ etorsi ] ) . thus , to define the affine geometry on a manifold @xmath467 , it is necessary and sufficient to define three tensor fields : metric , torsion , and nonmetricity . we stress once again that all three object can be specified in a completely arbitrary way , and they can be considered different dynamical variables in models of mathematical physics . it is easy to compute the number of independent components of connection , torsion , and nonmetricity tensors : @xmath498=m^3,~~~~~~ [ t_{\mu\nu}{}^\rho]=\frac{m^2(m-1)}2,~~~~~~ [ q_{\mu\nu\rho}]=\frac{m^2(m+1)}2.\ ] ] this shows that the total number of independent components of the torsion and nonmetricity tensors equals the number of components of the affine connection . in the attempt to unite gravity and electromagnetism , h. weyl considered the nonmetricity tensor of a special type @xcite @xmath499 where @xmath500 is the weyl form identified with the electromagnetic potential ( here , torsion was assumed to be identically equal to zero ) . we say that the _ riemann cartan weyl geometry _ is defined on a manifold if there are given a metric , torsion , and nonmetricity of special type ( [ ewevec ] ) . if the nonmetricity tensor is identically zero , @xmath501 , but the metric and torsion are nontrivial , then we say that the _ riemann cartan geometry _ is given on a manifold . as a consequence of ( [ elicon ] ) , the affine connection is defined uniquely by the metric and torsion in this case : @xmath502 this connection is called metrical because the covariant derivative of the metric is identically equal to zero : @xmath503 the metricity condition provides commutativity of covariant differentiation and the raising and lowering of indices . if both nonmetricity and torsion tensors are identically equal to zero , @xmath501 , @xmath505 , and the metric is nontrivial , then we say that _ riemannian geometry _ is given on a manifold . in this case , the metrical connection is symmetric with respect to the first two indices and uniquely defined by the metric @xmath506 this connection is called the _ levy - civita connection _ or _ christoffel symbols_. we use the tilde to denote the geometrical objects constructed only for the metric and zero torsion and nonmetricity , i.e. , in a ( pseudo-)riemannian geometry . the prefix pseudo- is used when the metric is not positive definite . from the expression for christoffel symbols ( [ etigam ] ) , we see that @xmath507 this means that for the christoffel symbols to be zero in some coordinate system it is necessary and sufficient that the metric components be constant in these coordinates . in another coordinate system , they may be nontrivial because christoffel symbols are not components of a tensor . for example , the christoffel symbols for euclidean space are zero in the cartesian coordinates but differ from zero , e.g. , in spherical or cylindrical coordinate systems . in the case where the nonmetricity tensor and torsion are identically zero , and there is a coordinate system in which the metric is equal to the diagonal unit matrix in the neighborhood of every point , and , consequently , the christoffel symbols are zero , the geometry is called locally euclidean . the corresponding coordinate system is called _ we say that a vector field @xmath472 is transported parallel along a curve @xmath346 , @xmath508 , if @xmath509 where @xmath510 is the tangent vector to the curve . multiplying this equation by @xmath511 we obtain @xmath512 where @xmath513 . we say that under the parallel transport from a point @xmath514 to a neighboring point @xmath515 , the vector @xmath516 acquires a differential @xmath517 , which is linear in @xmath518 and the components of the vector field . in a similar way , we define parallel transport of arbitrary tensor fields along a curve @xmath346 . the result of parallel transport between two points depends in general on a curve connecting these points . we note that parallel transport along a curve is defined only by an affine connection and has no relation to a metric . there are two types of distinguished curves @xmath346 in an affine geometry : geodesics and extremals . a geodesic line is a curve such that a vector tangent to it remains tangent under parallel transport along the curve . with the parameter @xmath358 along the curve chosen canonically , a geodesic line is defined by the system of ordinary nonlinear differential equations @xmath519 although a geodesic line is defined only by the symmetric part of the affine connection @xmath520 , the latter depends nontrivially on torsion and nonmetricity . explicit expression ( [ elicon ] ) yields @xmath521 the second type of distinguished curves in an affine geometry are extremals or lines of extremal length connecting two points . these lines are exclusively defined by the metric . with the parameter along the curve chosen canonically , extremals are defined by an equation similar to ( [ egeoeq ] ) , @xmath522 however , we now have not a general affine connection on the right - hand side but christoffel symbols constructed only from the metric . we see that geodesics and extremals are in general different curves on a manifold . in a riemann cartan geometry , geodesics and extremals coincide if and only if the torsion tensor is antisymmetric in all three indices . in riemannian geometry , geodesics and extremals always coincide . the primary role in differential geometry is played by the curvature tensor of the affine connection , which arises in different contexts . in local coordinates , it is defined by the expression @xmath523 where the parenthesis @xmath524 denote the previous terms with the permuted indices @xmath19 and @xmath436 . it can be easily verified that curvature ( [ ecurva ] ) is indeed a tensor field . we note that the curvature tensor has no relation to a metric and is defined entirely by the connection . in an affine geometry , the curvature tensor with all of its indices lowered has no symmetry under permutations of indices except antisymmetry in the first two indices . contraction of the curvature tensor in the two indices yields the ricci tensor @xmath525 , which is also defined entirely by the connection . in riemannian geometry , the ricci tensor for the levi - civita connection is symmetric with respect to the permutation of indices : @xmath526 . in a riemann cartan geometry , this symmetry is generally absent for a nonzero torsion tensor . the affine connection is called locally trivial if in the neighborhood of every point one can choose the coordinate system in which all components of the connection are zero . now we formulate two important theorems . the proof of this theorem is reduced to an analysis of the transformation rule for the affine connection components in ( [ econts ] ) . if in the new coordinate system the symmetric part of the connection components is equal to zero , then the system of differential equations for the transition functions appears . the local integrability condition for this system of equations is provided by the equality of the curvature tensor to zero . [ tlocev]if for a given affine geometry the torsion , nonmetricity , and curvature tensors are equal to zero on the whole manifold , then this manifold is isometric either to the whole ( pseudo-)euclidean space @xmath470 or to the quotient space @xmath528 , where @xmath529 is a discreet transformation group acting freely . the riemann cartan geometry defined by the metric and torsion provides the basis for the geometric theory of defects . in the analysis of such models , it is more convenient to introduce the cartan variables : the vielbein and @xmath530 connection instead of the metric and torsion . we assume here that a metric on a manifold is positive definite . if a metric were not positively definite then the @xmath531 connection would appear , where @xmath532 . for a riemannian metric , the orthonormal vielbein @xmath533 , @xmath534 , is defined by the system of quadratic equations @xmath535 where @xmath16 is the kronecker symbol . this relation uniquely defines metric for a given vielbein . conversely , system of equations ( [ etetra ] ) defines the vielbein for a given metric up to local @xmath530 rotations . we distinguish greek and latin indices because different transformation groups act on them . from definition ( [ etetra ] ) , we see that @xmath536 . components of the inverse vielbein @xmath537 , @xmath538 , can be considered components of @xmath425 orthonormal vector fields @xmath539 on a manifold @xmath467 with respect to the metric @xmath465 @xmath540 components of the vielbein @xmath55 define @xmath425 orthonormal 1-forms @xmath541 on a manifold . it is known that any manifold @xmath467 can be equipped with a riemannian metric ( see , for e.g. , @xcite ) . at the same time , the global existence of a vielbein provides , in particular , an orientation of the manifold @xmath467 . thus , a vielbein may exist globally only on orientable manifolds . there are also other topological restrictions for the global existence of a vielbein that we do not discuss here . the coordinate basis @xmath542 of the tangent space in every point of @xmath467 is called holonomic . components of tensors of an arbitrary type may also be considered with respect to the unholonomic basis @xmath313 of tangent spaces defined by the vielbein . for example , a vector field has the components @xmath543 we always assume that the transformation of greek indices into latin ones and vice versa is performed with the help of the vielbein . we now define the @xmath530 connection @xmath544 . this is the name of the connection of the principal fiber bundle with the structure lie group @xmath530 and the base @xmath467 . if the riemann - cartan geometry is given on @xmath467 , and the vielbein is defined , then we can define the @xmath530 connection by the relation @xmath545 we see that under coordinate changes , the components of @xmath546 transform as a covector field in the greek index . thus , they define a 1-form on @xmath467 . for a given vielbein , this relation provides a one - to - one correspondence between components of the connections @xmath491 and @xmath546 . the @xmath530 connection defines covariant derivatives for components of tensor fields relative to an unholonomic basis . for example , @xmath547 the covariant derivative is naturally defined for a tensor field having both greek and latin indices . taking the covariant derivative of eqn ( [ etetra ] ) leads to the antisymmetry of the components @xmath548 . this means that the 1-form @xmath549 takes values in the lie algebra @xmath550 , and this indeed corresponds to the @xmath530 connection . in the general case of an affine geometry , the cartan variables can also be defined by relations ( [ etetra ] ) and ( [ etecov ] ) . for this , we have to replace the kronecker symbol on the right - hand side of ( [ etetra ] ) with an arbitrary nondegenerate symmetric matrix @xmath551 . in this case , relation ( [ etecov ] ) defines a linear @xmath552 connection . in the riemann cartan geometry with the lorentzian - signature metric , we would have the lorentz @xmath553 connection . we consider local rotations with a matrix @xmath554 to show that the components @xmath546 do define an @xmath530 connection in the riemann cartan geometry . by definition , the components of vector fields and 1-forms transform under local rotations according to the rule @xmath555 in order that covariant derivatives ( [ ecodve ] ) have the tensor transformation rule under local rotations , it is necessary and sufficient that the components of the @xmath530 connection transform according to the rule @xmath556 this is the transformation law for the @xmath530 connection , indeed . the same transformation law follows from definition ( [ etecov ] ) if the vielbein @xmath55 transforms as a vector with respect to the index @xmath171 , and the christoffel symbols remain unchanged . of course , we can introduce the metrical and @xmath530 connections on @xmath467 in an independent way . if we require afterwards that the @xmath530 connection acts on tensor field components relative to an unholonomic basis defined by the vielbein , we obtain a one - to - one correspondence between the components of the connections ( [ etecov ] ) . we now express the components of the metric connection @xmath491 through the vielbein @xmath55 and @xmath530 connection @xmath546 with the help of relation ( [ etecov ] ) and substitute them into the definitions of torsion ( [ etorsi ] ) and curvature ( [ ecurva ] ) . as a result , we obtain expressions for torsion and curvature in terms of the cartan variables @xmath557 where @xmath558 torsion ( [ ecurcv ] ) and curvature ( [ ecucav ] ) are 2-forms on the manifold @xmath467 with the values in the vector space and lie algebra @xmath550 , respectively . an @xmath530 connection @xmath546 is called locally trivial if every point has a neighborhood containing this point such that it has the form @xmath559 obviously , after local rotation with the matrix @xmath560 , all components of the connection become zero . this connection is also called a pure gauge . one can easily verify that the curvature of a locally trivial connection identically vanishes . the inverse statement is also valid . this theorem is valid for any structure lie group . the proof is reduced to an analysis of transformation rule ( [ elocta ] ) . if the left - hand side of this equation is zero , then we have a system of equations for the field @xmath561 for which vanishing of curvature tensor is the local integrability condition . the space with zero curvature tensor @xmath163 is called the space of absolute parallelism because the parallel displacement of a vector does not depend on the path connecting two fixed points of the manifold . we can perform a local @xmath530 rotation for the locally trivial @xmath530 connection such that it becomes zero : @xmath562 . then , the zero - torsion equality becomes @xmath563 this equation is the local integrability condition for the system of equations @xmath564 for @xmath425 functions @xmath49 . a solution of this system of equations yields the transition functions to cartesian coordinates . thus , the equalities of curvature and torsion tensors to zero are the necessary and sufficient conditions for the existence of the fields @xmath561 and @xmath49 , i.e. , the existence of such a local rotation and coordinate system where the connection vanishes and the metric becomes euclidean . we note that equality of torsion tensor to zero alone is not enough for the existence of a cartesian coordinate system . three - dimensional space is considered in the geometric theory of defects . we make two remarks concerning this . in lower dimensions , the algebraic structure of the curvature tensor with all lowered indexes becomes much simpler . in two dimensions the full curvature tensor in the riemann cartan geometry is in the one - to - one correspondence with its scalar curvature : @xmath565 in three dimensional space , the full curvature tensor is in the one - to - one correspondence with its ricci tensor @xmath566 these formulas are also correct for nonzero torsion . concluding this appendix , we write the identity that is valid in the riemann cartan geometry in an arbitrary number of dimensions : @xmath567 the riemannian scalar curvature on the right - hand side of this equality is constructed only from the vielbein for zero torsion . i. a. kunin and b. i. kunin . gauge theories in mechanics . in _ trends in application of pure mathematics to mechanics . lecture notes in physics , v.249 . _ , pages 246249 , berlin heidelberg , 1986 . verlag . f. w. hehl , j. d. mccrea , e. w. mielke , and y. neeman . metric - affine gauge theory of gravity : field equations , noether identities , world spinors , and breaking of dilaton invariance . , 258(1&2):1171 , 1995 . v. e. zakharov , s. v. manakov , s. p. novikov , and l. p. pitaevskii . . nauka , moscow , 1980 . ; english transl . : s. p. novikov , s. v. manakov , l. p. pitaevskii , and v. e. zakharov _ the inverse scattering method _ plenum , new york ( 1984 ) . b. a. dubrovin , s. p. novikov , a. t. fomenko . . nauka , moscow , 1998 , fourth edition . [ in russian ] ; english transl . prev . ed . : b. a. dubrovin , a. t. fomenko , and s. p. novikov _ modern geometry : methods and applications , _ part 1 , _ the geometry of surfaces , transformation groups , and fields , _ springer , new york ( 1992 ) . Abstract:

Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.

Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered . Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video . Paper: the chemical composition of a galaxy is one of its most fundamental characteristics . here we focus on disk galaxies . because the chemical enrichment depends on various physical processes , such as the star formation history and the mass exchange between the galaxy and its environment , progress in our understanding of galaxy formation and evolution processes depends to a large extent on improving our knowledge of the detailed chemical properties of galaxies , such as the radial distribution of element abundances across galactic disks . establishing the macroscopic properties of spiral and irregular galaxies that likely govern the distribution of heavy elements across their disks is very important in understanding the ( chemical ) evolution of galaxies . accurate abundance determinations in a sample of galaxies are mandatory for such investigations . the classical @xmath1 method , often referred to as the direct method , is generally considered to provide the most reliable oxygen and nitrogen abundances in hii regions . when this method can not be used ( due to the lack of measurements of the required weak auroral lines in the spectra of hii regions ) then combinations of the strong nebular line intensities in spectra of hii regions can be used as indicators of their oxygen abundances , as was first suggested by @xcite and @xcite . this approach is usually referred to as the `` strong - line method '' and has been widely adopted . the establishment of calibrations ( i.e. , of relations between metallicity - sensitive emission - line combinations and metallicity ) was the subject of numerous studies ( * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * among many others ) . a calibration is defined not only by the adopted indicators but also by the objects that serve as calibrating data points . a sample of hii regions with abundances derived through the @xmath2 method is used to construct an empirical calibration . a set of photoionization models is used to construct a theoretical ( model ) calibration . even if the same indicator is used in the empirical calibration and in the theoretical calibration and if the same spectral measurements in a given hii region are used , those calibrations can produce significantly different abundance estimations . metallicities derived using theoretical calibrations tend to be systematically higher ( up to @xmath30.7 dex ) than those derived using the empirical calibrations ( see reviews by * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ) . therefore , oxygen abundances in extragalactic hii regions obtained in different studies using different calibrations can be significantly different . spectroscopic measurements of hii regions within and beyond optical radii of galaxies were carried out in many works ( see list of references below ) . in these studies , usually the hii regions in one or several galaxies are measured and the radial distributions of the element abundances across the disks of those galaxies are estimated . since often different methods for abundance determinations are used in different works , the resulting abundances from these studies are not homogeneous and can not be directly compared to each other . therefore , the abundances in a sample of galaxies can be analyzed only after those abundances are homogenized , i.e. , all the abundances are redetermined in a uniform way . this is the first step in our present investigation . it should be noted that there have been several attempts to use uniform abundances for the determination of radial abundance gradients in a sample of galaxies ; e.g. , @xcite for a sample of 30 galaxies , @xcite for 39 galaxies , @xcite for 11 galaxies , @xcite for 54 galaxies , and @xcite for 21 galaxies . however , those samples contain a relatively small number of galaxies ( whereas our present sample includes 130 galaxies ) . so far , little attention has been paid to the radial distributions of nitrogen abundances in the disks of galaxies , despite the fact that this provides several advantages for the study of the chemical evolution of galaxies . indeed , since at 12+log(o / h ) @xmath4 8.3 , secondary nitrogen becomes dominant and the nitrogen abundance increases at a faster rate than the oxygen abundance ( e.g. , * ? ? ? * ) , the change in nitrogen abundances with galactocentric distance should then show a larger amplitude in comparison to oxygen abundances and , as a consequence , should be easier to measure . furthermore , there is a time delay in nitrogen production as compared to oxygen production @xcite . thus the comparison between the radial distributions of oxygen and nitrogen abundances in the disks of galaxies can shed additional light on the chemical evolution of galaxies . therefore we consider here not only the radial distributions of oxygen abundances but also those of nitrogen abundances . our paper is organized in the following way . we describe the method used for the oxygen and nitrogen abundance determinations in the hii regions of our galaxy sample in section 2 . we describe the observational data that were used to determine the abundances in the hii regions in section 3 . we discuss the abundance properties in the disks of nearby galaxies ( within the optical isophotal radii ) in section 4 . we summarize our results in section 5 . throughout this paper , we will use the following standard notations for the line intensities : + @xmath5 = @xmath6 \lambda 3727 + \lambda 3729 } /i_{{\rm h}\beta } $ ] , + @xmath7 = @xmath8 \lambda 6548 + \lambda 6584 } /i_{{\rm h}\beta } $ ] , + @xmath9 = @xmath10 \lambda 6717 + \lambda 6731 } /i_{{\rm h}\beta } $ ] , + @xmath11 = @xmath12 } \lambda 4959 + \lambda 5007 } /i_{{\rm h}\beta } $ ] . + with these definitions , the excitation parameter @xmath13 can be expressed as : @xmath13 = @xmath11/(@xmath5+@xmath11 ) . a new method ( called the `` @xmath14 method '' ) for oxygen and nitrogen abundance determinations has recently been suggested @xcite . the idea of the @xmath14 method is a very simple . we have compared a several combinations of the strong - line intensities in the spectrum of a given hii region with those in the spectra of a sample of reference hii regions with known abundances in order to find the counterpart for the hii region under study . it is assumed that the oxygen and nitrogen abundances in the studied hii region are the same as in its counterpart . a counterpart can be selected by comparison of four combinations of strong - line intensities : @xmath13 = @xmath11/(@xmath5 + @xmath11 ) ( excitation parameter ) , log@xmath11 , log(@xmath7/@xmath5 ) , and log(@xmath9/@xmath5 ) . however , there are recent measurements of spectra of many hii regions where the intensities of [ oii]@xmath153727+@xmath153729 or [ sii]@xmath156717 , [ sii]@xmath156731 ) lines are not available ( e.g. , in @xcite or in the sloan digital sky survey ( sdss ) ; see @xcite ) . it has been argued that the oxygen and nitrogen abundances in hii regions can be estimated even if the [ sii]@xmath156717+@xmath156731 emission line is not measured @xcite or if the [ oii]@xmath153727+@xmath153729 emission line is not available @xcite . the @xmath14 method can be adapted to such cases @xcite . to find the counterpart for the hii region under study , one does not need to compare the four combinations of strong - line intensities , but can instead also use only three combinations : 1 ) log@xmath11 , @xmath13 , and log(@xmath7/@xmath5 ) , or 2 ) log@xmath11 , log@xmath7 , and log(@xmath7/@xmath9 ) . when this first set of combinations of strong - line intensities is used to find the counterpart then the resulting oxygen and nitrogen abundances will be referred to as ( o / h)@xmath16 and ( n / h)@xmath16 . when the second set of combinations of strong - line intensities is used to find the counterpart then the inferred oxygen and nitrogen abundances will be called ( o / h)@xmath17 and ( n / h)@xmath17 . the data for reference hii regions with @xmath2-based abundances are compiled in @xcite . the very recent spectroscopic observations of @xcite have been added to the compilation . using these combined data we select a sample of reference hii regions for which all the absolute differences for oxygen abundances ( o / h)@xmath16 ( o / h)@xmath18 and ( o / h)@xmath17 ( o / h)@xmath18 and for nitrogen abundances ( n / h)@xmath16 ( n / h)@xmath18 and ( n / h)@xmath17 ( n / h)@xmath18 are less than 0.1 dex . this sample of reference hii regions contains 250 objects and will in the following be used for abundance determinations . this sample will be referred to as @xmath19 sample ( etalon sample 2013 ) below . furthermore , only blue spectra were observed for hii regions in a number of galaxies ( e.g. , * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ) , i.e. , intensities of [ nii]@xmath156584 and [ sii]@xmath156717 , [ sii]@xmath156731 ) are not available in those cases . the oxygen abundances in those hii regions can be estimated through the @xmath13 calibration where only the oxygen [ oii]@xmath153727+@xmath153729 and [ oiii]@xmath155007 lines are used @xcite . we have constructed a new variant of the @xmath13 calibration . the sample of reference hii regions , @xmath19 , has been used as calibration data points . to enlarge the number of calibration data points , we have added a number of hii regions with ( o / h)@xmath16 abundances that were chosen in the following way . we determined the ( o / h)@xmath16 abundances in hii regions and obtained radial oxygen abundance gradients across the disks of galaxies ( see below ) . the hii regions where the deviations of the ( o / h)@xmath16 abundances from the general radial abundance trend are less than 0.1 dex were added to the sample of reference hii regions . it is well known that the relation between the oxygen abundance and the strong oxygen line intensities is double - valued , with two distinct parts traditionally known as the upper and lower branches of the r@xmath20 o / h diagram . we have delimited the upper and lower branches and the transition zone , adopting 12+log(o / h ) = 8.3 as the boundary between the upper branch and the transition zone and 12+log(o / h ) = 8.0 as the boundary between the transition zone and the lower branch . these boundaries are somewhat arbitrary , but were chosen so as to give the best calibrations with the existing data . two distinct relations between the oxygen abundance and the strong oxygen line intensities will be established in the following , one for the upper branch ( the high - metallicity calibration ) and one for the lower branch ( the low - metallicity calibration ) . the relation between the oxygen abundance @xmath21 @xmath22 12 + log ( o / h)@xmath23 and r@xmath24 and p can be fitted by a polynomial of the form @xcite @xmath25 where we have used the notation z @xmath22 12 + log ( o / h ) for brevity . to take into account the dependence on the excitation parameter @xmath13 , the coefficients of eq . ( [ equation : kr3 ] ) are chosen to have the form @xmath26 the coefficients @xmath27 , @xmath28 , @xmath29 , @xmath30 , @xmath31 , and @xmath32 can then be determined by looking for the best fit to our sample of hii regions . we wish to derive a set of coefficients in eq . ( [ equation : kr3 ] ) which gives the minimum value of @xmath33 = @xmath34 . here @xmath35 is equal to log(o / h)@xmath36 log(o / h)@xmath37 for each hii region in our sample . the quantity @xmath33 is the average value of the differences between the oxygen abundances determined through the @xmath13 calibration and the original ones . a few data points with large deviations , in excess of 0.15 dex , are rejected , and are not used in the determination of the final relation . the obtained upper - branch @xmath13 calibration ( for 12 + log(o / h ) @xmath4 8.3 ) is @xmath38 the obtained lower - branch @xmath13 calibration ( for 12 + log(o / h ) @xmath39 8.0 ) is @xmath40 hence , here we use the empirical metallicity scale defined by the hii regions with abundances derived through the direct method ( @xmath2 method ) . we have carried out a fairly comprehensive compilation of published spectra of hii regions in late - type galaxies . only those galaxies where radial abundance gradients can be estimated were taken into consideration . our final list includes 130 galaxies . table [ table : sample ] lists the general characteristics of each galaxy . the first column gives its name . we have used the most widely used name for each galaxy . the galaxies are listed in order of name category , with the following categories in descending order : + ngc new general catalogue , + ic index catalogue , + ugc uppsala general catalog of galaxies , + pgc catalogue of principal galaxies . + the morphological type of the galaxy and morphological type code @xmath41 from leda are reported in columns 2 and 3 . the right ascension ( r.a . ) and declination ( decl . ) ( j2000.0 ) of each galaxy are given in columns 4 and 5 . the right ascension and declination are taken from the nasa / ipac extragalactic database ( ned ) . the isophotal radius @xmath0 in arcmin of each galaxy is reported in column 6 . unless otherwise stated , the @xmath0 values are taken from ( * ? ? ? * thereafter rc3 ) . the position angle and inclination are listed in columns 7 and 8 , and the sources for these values are given in column 9 . the adopted distance and its reference are reported in columns 10 and 11 . the ned distances use flow corrections for virgo , the great attractor , and shapley supercluster infall . the isophotal radius in kpc , estimated from the data in columns 6 and 10 , is listed in column 12 . we have carried out an extensive search of the literature and compiled a sample of measurements of hii regions in nearby late - type galaxies . we have searched for spectra of hii regions with the requirement that they include the [ oii]@xmath153727+@xmath153729 , [ oiii]@xmath155007 , [ nii]@xmath156584 , and [ sii]@xmath156717+@xmath156731 lines . while we have tried to include as many sources as possible , we do not claim our search to be exhaustive . thus , for each listed spectrum , we record the measured values of [ oii]@xmath153727+@xmath153729 , [ oiii]@xmath155007 , [ nii]@xmath156584 , [ sii]@xmath156717 , and [ sii]@xmath156731 . the intensities of all lines are normalised to the h@xmath42 line flux . the predicted values of the flux ratio of oxygen [ oiii]@xmath155007/[oiii]@xmath154959 and nitrogen [ nii]@xmath156584/[nii]@xmath156548 lines are very close to three @xcite . the measurements of the [ oiii]@xmath155007 and @xmath154959 lines in sdss spectra confirm this value of the flux ratio ( e.g. , * ? ? ? therefore , the value of @xmath11 can be estimated without [ oiii]@xmath154959 line as @xmath43[oiii]@xmath155007 , and , similarly , the values of @xmath7 are estimated without the lines [ nii]@xmath156548 as @xmath7 = 1.33[nii]@xmath156584 . we have taken the de - reddened line intensities as reported by the authors . in some papers only the measured fluxes are reported . in these cases , the measured emission - line fluxes were corrected for interstellar reddening using the theoretical h@xmath44 to h@xmath42 ratio ( i.e. , the standard value of h@xmath44/h@xmath42 = 2.86 ) and the analytical approximation to the whitford interstellar reddening law from @xcite . the spectroscopic data so assembled form the basis of the present study . our total list contains 3904 spectra including 162 spectra of hii regions beyond the isophotal radius @xmath0 . here we will examine the radial oxygen and nitrogen abundance distributions within the isophotal radius in every galaxy . the radial oxygen and nitrogen abundances beyond the isphotal radius will be discussed elsewere . when measurements of the lines [ oii]@xmath153727+@xmath153729 , [ oiii]@xmath155007 , and [ nii]@xmath156584 were available then the oxygen ( o / h)@xmath16 and nitrogen ( n / h)@xmath16 abundances in the hii regions were estimated and used in our study . if the intensity of the line [ oii]@xmath153727+@xmath153729 was not measured but the measurements of the lines [ oiii]@xmath155007 , [ nii]@xmath156584 , [ sii]@xmath156717 , and [ sii]@xmath156731 ) were available then the oxygen ( o / h)@xmath17 and nitrogen ( n / h)@xmath17 abundances of the hii regions were estimated and used . if the measurements of only the oxygen lines [ oii]@xmath153727+@xmath153729 and [ oiii]@xmath155007 were available ( blue spectrum was observed only ) then the oxygen ( o / h)@xmath45 abundance of the hii regions was estimated and adopted . the deprojected radii of the hii regions were computed using their coordinates ( or offsets from the nucleus ) as reported in the original papers , as were the position angle and inclination listed in table [ table : sample ] . in some publications , the positions of the observed hii regions ( or their identifications in catalogues ) were not reported , but the deprojected radii were listed instead . in these cases these deprojected radii were used ( after correction for the galaxy distance adopted here , if necessary ) . the fractional radii ( normalized to the optical isophotal radius @xmath0 ) were obtained with isophotal radii from table [ table : sample ] . the radial oxygen abundance distribution within the isophotal radius in every galaxy was fitted by the following equation : @xmath46 where 12 + log(o / h)@xmath47 is the oxygen abundance at @xmath48 = 0 , i.e. , the extrapolated central oxygen abundance , c@xmath49 , is the slope of the oxygen abundance gradient expressed in terms of dex @xmath50 , and @xmath51/@xmath52 is the fractional radius ( the galactocentric distance normalized to the disk s isophotal radius @xmath0 ) . we also determined the oxygen abundance gradient expressed in terms of dex kpc@xmath53 . if there were data points with large deviations , in excess of 0.2 dex , those points were rejected , and were not used in the determination of the final relation . the derived parameters of the oxygen abundance distributions are presented in table [ table : grad ] . the name of the galaxy is listed in column 1 . the extrapolated central 12 + log(o / h)@xmath47 oxygen abundance and the gradient ( the coefficient c@xmath49 in eq . ( [ equation : grado ] ) ) expressed in terms of dex @xmath54 are listed in columns 2 and 3 . the oxygen abundance gradient expressed in terms of dex kpc@xmath53 is listed in column 4 . the scatter of oxygen abundances around the general radial oxygen abundance trend is reported in column 5 . as in the case of the oxygen abundance , the radial nitrogen abundance distribution in every galaxy was fitted by the following equation : @xmath55 again , if there were data points with large deviations , in excess of 0.3 dex , those points were rejected , and were not used in the determination of the final relation . these different rejection criteria for oxygen abundances , 0.2 dex , and nitrogen abundances , 0.3 dex , are used for the following reason . there is no one - to - one correspondence between nitrogen and oxygen abundances , but instead there is a scatter in n / h at a given o / h . therefore one can expect that the natural scatter in n / h at a given galactocentric distance can be larger than that in o / h assuming similar uncertainties in both abundance determinations . the derived parameters of the nitrogen abundance distributions are presented in table [ table : grad ] . the extrapolated central 12 + log(n / h)@xmath47 nitrogen abundance and the gradient ( the coefficient c@xmath56 in eq . ( [ equation : gradn ] ) ) expressed in terms of dex @xmath50 are listed in columns 6 and 7 . the nitrogen abundance gradient expressed in terms of dex kpc@xmath53 is listed in column 8 . the scatter of nitrogen abundances around the general radial nitrogen abundance trend is reported in column 9 . a list of references for the emission line flux measurements in the hii regions is given in table [ table : reference ] . in the case of ( o / h)@xmath23 abundances , there is the following problem . the relationship between oxygen abundance and strong oxygen line intensities , the @xmath13 calibration , is double - valued with two distinct parts usually known as the `` lower '' and `` upper '' branches of the @xmath57 o / h relationship . the expression for the oxygen abundance determination in high metallicity hii regions , eq . ( [ equation : ohph ] ) , is valid only for hii regions that belong to the upper branch , with 12+log(o / h ) @xmath4 8.3 . thus , one has to know a priori on which of the two branches the hii region lies . we can overcome this problem in the way suggested in @xcite . it has been known for a long time @xcite that disks of spiral galaxies show radial oxygen abundance gradients , in the sense that the oxygen abundance is higher in the central part of the disk and decreases with galactocentric distance . we thus start from the hii regions in the central part of disks and move outward until the radius @xmath58 where the oxygen abundance decreases to 12+log(o / h ) @xmath3 8.3 . it should be noted that it is difficult to establish the exact value of @xmath58 due to the scatter in oxygen abundance values at any fixed radius . an unjustified use of eq . ( [ equation : ohph ] ) in the determination of the oxygen abundance in low - metallicity hii regions beyond @xmath58 would result in overestimated oxygen abundances , and would produce a false turnover in the slope of the abundance gradients @xcite . therefore , hii regions with galactocentric distances larger than @xmath58 , i.e. , those with 12+log(o / h ) @xmath39 8.3 were rejected . the derived radial distributions of the oxygen and nitrogen abundances in 130 galaxies are presented in figure [ figure : gs1 ] . the oxygen abundances for individual hii regions are indicated by points . all the data points ( including points with large deviations , which are rejected and are not used in determination of the final relation ) are shown . the linear best fits ( derived via the least squares method ) to the points are represented by solid lines . the galactocentric distances are normalized to the isophotal radius . the nitrogen abundances for individual hii regions are shown by the plus signs . the linear best fits to the points are indicated by dashed lines . the values of the gradients in a number of galaxies ( e.g. , in ngc 12 , the first galaxy in our list ) are rather small and are comparable ( or even lower ) to the uncertainties of gradients . it can be assumed that there is no abundance gradient in such a galaxy , and its abundance can be specified by the mean of the central abundance and the abundance at the isophotal @xmath0 radius of the galaxy . thus , the radial oxygen and nitrogen abundance distributions across the optical disk in every galaxy are individually fitted by a single relation . it looks like a rather good approximation for the majority of galaxies . however , a small change in slope in the abundance distribution can not be excluded in the disks of several galaxies ( e.g. , ngc 925 , ngc 3184 , ngc 5457 ) . it is interesting to note the following . @xcite studied the surface brightness profiles of a sample of late - type ( sb to sdm ) spiral galaxies using imaging data from the sdss survey . they found that the surface brightness profiles can be divided into three classes . a small fraction of galaxies ( around 10 % ) belong to type i , which comprises those galaxies that have a normal ( standard ) exponential disk down to the noise limit . the surface brightness distribution of the rest of the galaxies is better described as a broken exponential . about 60 % of the galaxies belong to type ii , which means that they show a down - bending profile with steeper outer part . about 30 % of the galaxies belong to type iii , implying that they show an up - bending profile with shallower outer part . thus , the abundance distribution profile does not seem to follow strictly the slope of the surface brightness profile . it should be noted , however , that the number of measured hii regions in many galaxies is too small to allow one to detect a small bend in the radial abundance distribution . * ngc 1512 . * the five hii regions that are located in the `` bridge '' between the interacting galaxies ngc 1512 and ngc 1510 @xcite were excluded from our analysis . @xcite found that there is a significant discrepancy between the kinematically derived inclination of ngc 1512 and its photometric value ( @xmath59 = 65@xmath60 and @xmath61 = 35@xmath60 ) . they noted that the explanation is quite clear : the photometric parameter is mainly representative of the bar which contributes a large part of the light resulting in more edge - on values . however , the outer isophotes are much more face - on . therefore , the kinematic value of the inclination is adopted here . * ngc 2442 . * the peculiar spiral galaxy ngc 2442 is tidally distorted * and references therein ) . * ngc 3227 . * ngc 3227 is a nearby seyfert galaxy that is interacting with its gas - poor dwarf elliptical companion ngc 3226 . @xcite discovered a cloud of hi close to , but physically and kinematically distinct from , the galactic disk of ngc 3227 . they suggested that this cloud ( j1023 + 1952 ) might be a dwarf galaxy that is either preexisting and being accreted by ngc 3227 , or a newly created tidal dwarf galaxy @xcite . however , the oxygen abundance of the cloud ( hii regions 24 and 25 from @xcite and of the hii region measured by @xcite ) follows the general trend of the radial abundance distribution in the disk of ngc 3227 . the oxygen abundances of the hii region in the cloud estimated in different ways using the emission line measurements by @xcite are in satisfactory agreement to each other : 12+log(o / h)@xmath62 = 8.40 , 12+log(o / h)@xmath63 = 8.43 and 12+log(o / h)@xmath45 = 8.34 . hii regions 10 and 12 from @xcite follow also the general trend of the radial abundance distribution in the disk of ngc 3227 although those hii regions may be associated with ngc 3226 . * ngc 3239 . * the irregular galaxy ngc 3239 is a candidate for a merging system @xcite . the oxygen abundances determined in four hii regions from sdss spectra as well as the global abundance determined using the integrated spectra from @xcite are 12+log(o / h ) @xmath3 8.0 @xmath64 8.1 , i.e. , those abundances correspond to the transition zone between the upper and lower branches of the o / h @xmath65 diagram . therefore , the ( o / h)@xmath45 abundances we derived from measurements by @xcite are not reliable and were not used . * ngc 3310 . * ngc 3310 is believed to be an advanced merger and its unusual outer structure is probably the result of a recent merger with a smaller galaxy @xcite . spectroscopic observations of six hii regions in ngc 3310 were presented by @xcite . the auroral line [ oiii]@xmath154363 is detected in four hii regions . the @xmath2-based abundances in those hii regions are in the range from 12+log(o / h ) = 8.13 to 8.25 . however , the coordinates of the hii regions are not published , which prevents us from using those hii regions in radial gradient determinations . * ngc 3359 . * the ngc 3359 is a giant , very strongly barred spiral galaxy . @xcite estimated the radial gradient using the [ oiii]/h@xmath42 and [ nii]/[oiii ] indicators ( one - dimensional calibrations ) . they found the radial abundance gradient break near the corotation radius . @xcite carried out new measurements and determined abundances through the @xmath66 and @xmath67 calibrations following @xcite . they concluded that , with a high degree of confidence , a model with a break fits the data significantly better than one without a break . the @xmath14-based abundances show no gradient across the entire galaxy . the @xmath2-based abundances in three hii regions in ngc 3359 are in agreement with no gradient . * ngc 3718 . * this galaxy is so peculiar that it is difficult to categorize it morphologically @xcite . * ngc 4559 . * the hii regions in ngc 4559 with galactocentric radii larger than 0.4@xmath0 measured by @xcite were excluded since they are in the transition zone . * ngc 4625 . * this is a magellanic spiral with @xmath0 @xmath3 3 kpc and an extended faint disk reaching four times the optical @xmath0 radius of the galaxy in the ultraviolet . * ngc 5668 . * @xcite have found that within @xmath68 of the nucleus the oxygen abundance o / h follows an exponential profile while the outer abundance trend flattens out to an approximately constant value and could even reverse . * ngc 7518 . * this is a hydrogen - deficient galaxy in the pegasus cluster . following @xcite , oxygen lines from `` blue '' spectra ( 360 nm 560 nm ) have been used in the abundance determinations . * ngc 7529 . * this galaxy of the pegasus cluster has a normal hi content . there is no determination of the position angle , but the inclination is small . again following @xcite , oxygen lines from `` blue '' spectra have been used in the abundance determinations . * ngc 7591 . * this galaxy of the pegasus cluster has a normal hi content . as before , following @xcite , oxygen lines from `` blue '' spectra have been used in the abundance determinations . * ic 10 . * due to uncertainties in the position angle and in the inclination of ic 10 , the galactocentric distances of hii regions have been computed without any de - projection ( following * ? ? ? * ic 5309 . * a hydrogen - deficient galaxy of the pegasus cluster . following @xcite , oxygen lines from `` blue '' spectra have been used in the abundance determinations . * ugc 9562 = ii zw 71 . * the blue compact dwarf galaxy ugc 9562 is a probable polar - ring galaxy , and there are a several luminous hii regions along its major axis . the oxygen abundances in four hii regions are around 12+log(o / h ) @xmath3 8.2 , i.e. , those abundances correspond to the transition zone between the upper and lower branches of the o / h @xmath65 diagram . therefore , the ( o / h)@xmath45 abundances obtained with measurements from @xcite were not used . the global oxygen abundances determined from the integrated spectra from @xcite are 12+log(o / h ) @xmath3 8.3 . * pgc 029167 . * the dwarf galaxy `` garland '' or pgc 029167 ( a tidal dwarf candidate ; * ? ? ? * ) lies within the tidal bridges of neutral hydrogen connecting m 81 , m 82 and ngc 3077 . this alignment has led to the suggestion that this dwarf formed recently , as a result of tidal interactions within the group . hii regions in and near garland exhibit enhanced metallicities compared to other galaxies at similar luminosities . notably , the oxygen abundances are similar to abundances measured in m 81 and ngc 3077 ( * ? ? ? * and references therein ) . figure [ figure : ohnh ] shows the nitrogen abundance as a function of oxygen abundance in our sample of galaxies . the plus signs are the nitrogen ( n / h)@xmath47 and oxygen abundances ( o / h)@xmath47 at @xmath48 = 0 , i.e. , the central nitrogen and oxygen abundances . the points show the nitrogen ( n / h)@xmath69 and oxygen ( o / h)@xmath69 abundances at the @xmath0 radius of the galaxies . our data show a well - defined sequence in the o / h n / h plot . this sequence exhibits the well - known turnover in the sense that the slope at low metallicity is shallower than that at high metallicity . the commonly accepted explanation of this change of slope is that nitrogen can be interpreted as having both primary and secondary components . nitrogen production is primary at low metallicity , but for 12 + log(o / h ) @xmath4 8.3 , secondary nitrogen becomes prominent , and nitrogen increases at a faster rate than oxygen @xcite . figure [ figure : ohnh ] shows that at high metallicity , 12 + log(o / h ) @xmath4 8.2 , the relation between the logarithms of nitrogen and oxygen abundances can be approximated by a linear expression . for ( n / h)@xmath47 and ( o / h)@xmath47 abundances , we found the following relation through the least squares method : @xmath70 a similar relation @xmath71 was obtained for the ( n / h)@xmath69 and ( o / h)@xmath69 abundances . a comparison between eq . ( [ equation : nhro ] ) and eq . ( [ equation : nhrg ] ) shows that the relations n / h = @xmath72(o / h ) for the ( n / h)@xmath47 and ( o / h)@xmath47 abundances and for the ( n / h)@xmath69 and ( o / h)@xmath69 abundances agree with each other within the errors . the n / h = @xmath72(o / h ) relation given by eq . ( [ equation : nhro ] ) is presented in figure [ figure : ohnh ] by the solid line . the dashed lines indicate shifts along the y - axis by @xmath730.15 dex . at low metallicity , 12 + log(o / h ) @xmath39 8.0 , the single relation @xmath74 was found using both central abundances and abundances at the @xmath0 radii of the galaxies . this relation is presented in figure [ figure : ohnh ] by the dotted line . figure [ figure : ohnh ] shows that there is an appreciable spread in n / h at a given o / h . the variation in n / h is around a factor of 2 for a given o / h . the scatter can be partially attributed to the errors in the abundance determinations but part of it seems to be true abundance scatter . two major mechanisms have been proposed for generating a spread . one mechanism invokes a time delay between ejections of the freshly manufactured oxygen and nitrogen into the interstellar medium by a given stellar generation . the n / o ratios may be an indicator of the age of a galactic system , indicating the time that has passed since the bulk of star formation activity @xcite . thus , the n / o ratio in a galaxy would then depend on its star formation history . the second mechanism for causing n / h variations at a given o / h is a variation in the efficiency of enriched galactic winds @xcite or / and in the inflow of gas into the galaxy @xcite . it is believed that galactic winds do not play a significant role in the chemical evolution of large spiral galaxies @xcite . the enhanced n / o ratio in individual hii regions can be caused by the local pollution in nitrogen by wolf - rayet stars ( * ? ? ? * and references therein ) . since we consider `` average '' n and o abundances based on the abundances of different hii regions this origin of the scatter in our diagrams seems to be unlikely . it has been known for a long time that galaxies of different morphological types have different star formation histories , i.e. , spiral galaxies with early morphological types have a larger fraction of old stars @xcite . one can then expect that n / h at a given o / h may depend on the morphological type of galaxy expressed in terms of @xmath41 type @xcite . on the other hand , the star formation history of a galaxy also strongly depends on its mass ( or luminosity ) as is epitomized in the galaxy downsizing effect , where the star formation acitvity shifts from high - mass galaxies at early cosmic times to lower - mass galaxies at later epochs @xcite . again , one can expect then that the n / h ratio at a given o / h will depend on the galaxy mass @xcite . there is a relatively tight linear correlation between the absolute magnitudes and the logarithms of the linear diameters of nearby galaxies @xcite . therefore , the linear diameter of a galaxy can be used as indicator of its luminosity ( and mass ) . thus , if the spread in n / h at a given o / h is caused by the time delay between nitrogen and oxygen enrichment and the different star formation histories in different galaxies then the n / h at a given o / h should correlate with morphological @xmath41 type or / and with linear radius of the galaxy . figure [ figure : residual ] shows the residual of eqs . ( [ equation : nhro]),([equation : nhrg ] ) as a function of the morphological @xmath41 type and linear radius of the galaxy @xmath0 . figure [ figure : residual ] indicates that there may exist some correlation between the n / h at a given o / h and morphological type or / and linear radius of the galaxy . to verify this , we found a relation between n / h and o / h for spiral galaxies ( with @xmath41 @xmath75 7.5 ) where @xmath41 and log@xmath0 are `` secondary parameters '' , n / h = @xmath72(o / h,@xmath41,log@xmath0 ) . it should be noted that @xmath41 and log@xmath0 are not a perfectly independent parameters since there is some correlation between them . the relation obtained for central abundances is @xmath76 the values of the coefficients in the terms containing @xmath41 and log@xmath0 are similar . however , the @xmath41 value is a more important second parameter than the log@xmath0 value since the variation in @xmath41 values ( from 1 to 7.5 ) is much larger than the variation of log@xmath0 values ( from @xmath30.6 to @xmath31.5 ) . therefore , the variation in n / h due to variation in the morphological type is larger than that due to variation in the linear radii of galaxies . for example , the sab galaxies ( @xmath41 = 2 ) have nitrogen abundances larger than on average 0.1 dex ( i.e. , by around 30% ) than sd ( @xmath41 = 7 ) galaxies with the same oxygen abundances . the relation n / h = @xmath72(o / h,@xmath41,log@xmath0 ) obtained for abundances at the optical @xmath0 radii of the galaxies is @xmath77 in this case the log@xmath0 value is the more important second parameter than the @xmath41 value . although the morphological type is the more important second parameter in the relation for central abundances while log@xmath0 is the more important second parameter in the relation for abundances at the optical @xmath0 radii of the galaxies , it is difficult to draw a solid conclusion whether this is physically meaningful since there is a correlation between @xmath41 and log@xmath0 . that the relation between n / h and o / h depends on the additional parameter(s ) @xmath41 and/or log@xmath0 suggests that the scatter in n / h at a given o / h can be caused , at least partly , by the time delay between nitrogen and oxygen enrichment and the different star formation histories in different galaxies . the upper left panel of figure [ figure : xhrof ] shows the central oxygen ( o / h)@xmath47 abundance in a galaxy as a function of its morphological @xmath41 type ( data from table [ table : sample ] and table [ table : grad ] ) . the ( o / h)@xmath47 @xmath41 diagram shows that there is a trend in central oxygen abundance with morphological type for galaxies later than sc ( @xmath41 @xmath4 5 ) such that the central oxygen abundances are lower in galaxies of later types . this trend disappears for early - type spiral galaxies ( @xmath41 @xmath39 5 ) . the upper right panel of figure [ figure : xhrof ] shows the central oxygen abundance in a galaxy as a function of its isophotal radius @xmath0 . since there is a relatively tight linear correlation between the absolute magnitudes and the logarithms of the linear diameters of nearby galaxies @xcite , this diagram can be considered as some kind of analog of the standard `` luminosity metallicity '' diagram . the ( o / h)@xmath47 @xmath0 diagram shows that there is a weak correlation between the central oxygen abundance and optical radius for small galaxies ( @xmath0 @xmath39 10 kpc ) in the sense that the smaller galaxies have on average lower oxygen abundances . this correlation disappears for large galaxies ( @xmath0 @xmath4 10 kpc ) , i.e. , the most oxygen - rich galaxies of different radii have similar central oxygen abundances . different versions of the luminosity metallicity diagram have been constructed in earlier studies . @xmath78-band luminosity characteristic oxygen abundance diagrams were considered in @xcite , where the characteristic oxygen abundance is defined as the abundance at @xmath51 = 0.4@xmath0 . @xcite have used the global abundances ( in the sense that their abundances do not correspond to the abundances at a fixed galactocentric distance , but instead are some kind of mean abundance for a fraction of a galaxy within the fiber aperture ) estimated from sdss spectra in constructing the luminosity metallicity diagram . the luminosity central metallicity diagram was examined in @xcite . the flattening of the luminosity metallicity relation at high luminosities ( essentially a plateau ) can be seen in all versions of the diagram . thus the plateau in our ( o / h)@xmath47 @xmath0 diagram at large radii is consistent with previous results . it has been advocated that the constant maximum value of the observed central oxygen abundance in the most oxygen - rich galaxies suggests that the observed oxygen abundance in the centers of those galaxies represents the maximum attainable value of the gas - phase oxygen abundance @xcite . the upper - row panels of figure [ figure : xhrof ] show that the observed central oxygen abundance in the most oxygen - rich galaxies in our sample is 12 + log(o / h)@xmath47 @xmath3 8.85 . the dashed lines in the upper row of panels of figure [ figure : xhrof ] show this value of oxygen abundance , which seems to correspond to the maximum attainable value of the gas - phase oxygen abundance in galaxies . the observed central oxygen abundance in the most oxygen - rich galaxies from our sample is a factor @xmath32 higher than the gas - phase oxygen abundance in the solar neighbourhood , 12 + log(o / h ) @xmath3 8.5 ( e.g. , * ? ? ? the maximum attainable value of the oxygen abundance in galaxies obtained here is in agreement with the value from @xcite . because some fraction of the oxygen ( about 0.1 dex ) is expected to be locked in dust grains ( e.g. , * ? ? ? * ) , the maximum value of the true ( gas + dust ) oxygen abundances in hii regions of spiral galaxies is 12 + log(o / h)@xmath47 @xmath3 8.95 . the lower left panel of figure [ figure : xhrof ] shows the central nitrogen ( n / h)@xmath47 abundance in a galaxy disk as a function of its morphological @xmath41 type . the comparison of the panels in the left column of figure [ figure : xhrof ] shows that the changes in the central oxygen and nitrogen abundances with morphological type of a galaxy are rather similar . the lower right panel of figure [ figure : xhrof ] shows the central nitrogen abundance in a galaxy disk as a function of its optical isophotal radius @xmath0 . again , the comparison between the right column panels of figure [ figure : xhrof ] indicates that the general behaviour of the central nitrogen abundances as a function of optical radius is similar to that for oxygen . according to the relation between nitrogen and oxygen abundances given in eq . ( [ equation : nhro ] ) , the value of 12 + log(n / h)@xmath47 @xmath3 8.42 corresponds to the maximum attainable value of the gas - phase oxygen abundance in galaxies with 12 + log(o / h)@xmath47 @xmath3 8.85 . this value of nitrogen abundance is indicated in the lower row of panels of figure [ figure : xhrof ] by the dashed lines . one can see that the value of 12 + log(n / h)@xmath47 @xmath3 8.42 can be adopted as the maximum value of the observed central nitrogen abundance in the most nitrogen - rich galaxies at the present - day epoch . however , in contrast to the case of oxygen , it is not necessary that this value corresponds to the the maximum attainable value of the gas - phase oxygen abundance in galaxies because of the time - delay between nitrogen and oxygen enrichment of the interstellar medium . the panels in the left column of figure [ figure : xhrgf ] show the oxygen ( o / h)@xmath69 ( upper panel ) and nitrogen ( n / h)@xmath69 ( lower panel ) abundances measured at the isophotal radius , @xmath0 , as a function of morphological @xmath41 type . a comparison between the panels in the left column of figure [ figure : xhrof ] and figure [ figure : xhrgf ] shows that the changes in the central oxygen ( nitrogen ) abundances and in the abundances at the optical edge of the disk along the hubble sequence ( or morphological type ) are more or less similar ( at least qualitatively ) . however , the oxygen and nitrogen abundances at the @xmath0 radius in four of the late - type galaxies ( ngc 4625 , ic 10 , ugc 223 , and pgc 29167 ) are high and those galaxies show a large deviation from the general trends . ngc 4625 is a magellanic spiral with @xmath0 @xmath3 3 kpc and a very extended faint disk ( see below ) . the dwarf irregular galaxy ic 10 has a very small optical radius , @xmath0 = 0.6 kpc , and a positive radial abundance gradient . one may suggest though that any radial gradient in such small galaxies is hard to define based on hii regions . it remains a mystery why the oxygen abundance changes by a factor of about two on the scale of 0.6 kpc in this galaxy . ic 10 is one of several dwarf galaxies in which evidence for localized , inhomogeneous enrichment has been found @xcite perhaps this is a common mode of enrichment in these small objects . in contrast , the irregular galaxy ugc 223 is rather large with @xmath0 = 9.3 kpc . the peculiar dwarf galaxy pgc 29167 ( or `` garland '' ) is commonly considered a tidal dwarf galaxy ( see comment on this galaxy in section 4.2 ) . the panels in the right column of figure [ figure : xhrgf ] show the oxygen ( o / h)@xmath69 ( upper panel ) and nitrogen ( n / h)@xmath69 ( lower panel ) abundances at the optical edge of the disk as defined by the @xmath0 radius as a function of isophotal radius @xmath0 . the positions of the galaxies in the ( o / h)@xmath69 @xmath0 and ( n / h)@xmath69 @xmath0 diagrams do not show any obvious trends . in particular , the ( o / h)@xmath69 and ( n / h)@xmath69 abundances do not show any appreciable correlation with isophotal radius @xmath0 . however , one feature in these diagrams should be noted : the ( o / h)@xmath69 and ( n / h)@xmath69 abundances have a maximum value in galaxies with an isophotal radius @xmath0 @xmath3 10 kpc and decrease when moving from this value both towards smaller or larger optical radii . figure [ figure : gradf ] shows the radial oxygen and nitrogen abundance gradients in units of dex kpc@xmath53 as a function of morphological @xmath41 type ( left panels ) and of isophotal radius @xmath0 of a galaxy ( right panels ) . inspection of the left column panels of figure [ figure : xhrgf ] shows that the values of the abundance gradients in units of dex kpc@xmath53 do not correlate with the morphological type of a galaxy . according to @xcite , the lack of a correlation between gradients in units of dex kpc@xmath53 and the macroscopic properties of late - type galaxies may suggest that the relationship between these parameters is more complex than a simple correlation . indeed , @xcite have concluded that a correlation for non - barred galaxies is seen . the panels in the right column of figure [ figure : xhrgf ] show that shallow gradients can be found both in small and large galaxies while steep gradients are seen only in small galaxies in the sense that the smaller a galaxy the steeper its gradient . we compiled published spectra of hii regions in 130 nearby galaxies . our list contains 3904 spectra including 162 spectra of hii regions beyond the isophotal radius @xmath0 . the oxygen and nitrogen abundances in hii regions were determined on the metallicity scale defined by hii regions with @xmath2-based abundances . the radial gradients of oxygen and nitrogen abundances across the disks of the galaxies were estimated . at the centers of metal - rich galaxies ( i.e. , ( 12 + log(o / h ) @xmath4 8.2 ) , we found the relation between n and o abundances to be ( n / h)@xmath79 @xmath80 ( o / h)@xmath81 . the ( n / h)@xmath69 = @xmath72(o / h)@xmath69 relation between n and o abundances at the @xmath0 isophotal radii of high metallicity galaxies is similar to that for the abundances at their centers . the variation in ( n / h ) at a given ( o / h ) is around 0.3 dex . to test whether the scatter in n / h at a given o / h can be explained by the time delay between nitrogen and oxygen enrichment and the different star formation histories in galaxies of different morphological types and dimensions ( masses ) , we derived a more complex relation between n and o abundances ( n / h ) = @xmath72((o / h),@xmath41,@xmath0 ) . we found that the morphological type , @xmath41 , is a more important `` second parameter '' in the relation for central abundances , while the log@xmath0 is a more important second parameter in the relation for abundances at the @xmath0 radii of our galaxies . since there is a correlation between @xmath41 and log@xmath0 it is as yet unclear whether this difference is meaningful the fact that the relation between n / h and o / h depends on additional parameter(s ) , namely @xmath41 and/or log@xmath0 suggests that the scatter in n / h at a given o / h can be caused , at least partly , by the time delay between nitrogen and oxygen enrichment and the different star formation histories in different galaxies . the best fit to n / h as a function of o / h is close to a linear relation at low metallicity ( 12 + log(o / h ) @xmath39 8.0 ) . the central oxygen abundances ( o / h)@xmath79 show a trend along the hubble sequence of galaxies of late morphological types ( @xmath41 @xmath4 5 ) such that the oxygen abundances are lower in galaxies of later types . this trend disappears for early morphological types . the central oxygen abundance also correlates with optical galaxy radius for small galaxies , @xmath0 @xmath39 10 kpc , being lower in galaxies of smaller radii . the trend disappears for galaxies with large radii . the maximum gas - phase oxygen abundance in large ( 10 kpc @xmath39 r@xmath82 @xmath39 30 kpc ) galaxies ( or in galaxies of early ( 1 @xmath39 @xmath41 @xmath39 5 ) morphological types ) is constant , 12 + log(o / h ) @xmath3 8.85 . this implies that the observed central oxygen abundance of the most oxygen - rich galaxies in our sample is a factor of @xmath32 higher than the gas - phase oxygen abundance in the solar neighbourhood . the central nitrogen abundances ( n / h)@xmath47 show a similar behaviour . the observed central nitrogen abundance in the most nitrogen - rich galaxies of our sample is 12 + log(o / h ) @xmath3 8.42 . the radial o and n abundance gradients ( in units of dex kpc@xmath53 ) within the optical radius do not show any significant correlation with the morphological type and optical radius . however , the spread in the gradients increases with decreasing galaxy radius in the sense that shallow gradients are seen both in small and large galaxies while steep gradients occur only in a small galaxies . the smaller a galaxy the steeper is the gradient that it may show . the abundance data set presented in this paper serves as the foundation for other investigations we are carrying out . in a forthcoming paper @xcite , we examine relations between the radial abundance distribution across the disk and the disk surface brightness profiles in the optical @xmath78 and infrared @xmath83 bands for a sample of nearby galaxies . we are grateful to the referee for his or her constructive comments . l.s.p . and e.k.g . acknowledge support within the framework of sonderforschungsbereich ( sfb 881 ) on `` the milky way system '' ( especially subproject a5 ) , which is funded by the german research foundation ( dfg ) . thanks the astronomisches rechen - institut at heidelberg university where this investigation was carried out for the hospitality . a.y.k . acknowledges the support from the national research foundation ( nrf ) of south africa . + we thank h.j . zahid and f. bresolin for supporting us with some unpublished details of their observations of hii regions in ngc 3359 . + the authors acknowledge the work of the sdss collaboration . funding for sdss - iii has been provided by the alfred p. sloan foundation , the participating institutions , the national science foundation , and the u.s . department of energy office of science . the sdss - iii web site is http://www.sdss3.org/. sdss - iii is managed by the astrophysical research consortium for the participating institutions of the sdss - iii collaboration including the university of arizona , the brazilian participation group , brookhaven national laboratory , university of cambridge , carnegie mellon university , university of florida , the french participation group , the german participation group , harvard university , the instituto de astrofisica de canarias , the michigan state / notre dame / jina participation group , johns hopkins university , lawrence berkeley national laboratory , max planck institute for astrophysics , max planck institute for extraterrestrial physics , new mexico state university , new york university , ohio state university , pennsylvania state university , university of portsmouth , princeton university , the spanish participation group , university of tokyo , university of utah , vanderbilt university , university of virginia , university of washington , and yale university . + we acknowledge the usage of the hyperleda database ( http://leda.univ-lyon1.fr ) . llcrrrrccrcr ngc 0012 & sc & 4.9 & 2.486458 & 4.612528 & 0.85 & 125 & 27 & 1 & 53.20 & 2 & 13.14 + ngc 0055 & sbm & 8.8 & 3.723333 & -39.196639 & 16.18 & 110 & 79 & 3 & 1.91 & 4 & 8.99 + ngc 0099 & sc & 5.9 & 5.997470 & 15.770428 & 0.71 & 0 & 24 & 1 & 77.00 & 5 & 15.82 + ngc 0224 & sb & 3.0 & 10.684792 & 41.269065 & 95.27 & 35 & 77 & 6 & 0.74 & 7 & 20.51 + ngc 0234 & sabc & 5.3 & 10.884977 & 14.342564 & 0.81 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 59.60 & 2 & 14.06 + ngc 0253 & sabc & 5.1 & 11.888000 & -25.288219 & 13.77 & 50 & 76 & 8 & 3.46 & 9 & 13.86 + ngc 0300 & scd & 6.9 & 13.722833 & -37.684389 & 10.94 & 106 & 42 & 10 & 1.94 & 4 & 6.17 + ngc 0428 & sabm & 8.6 & 18.232125 & 0.981557 & 2.04 & 120 & 41 & 1 & 14.80 & 11 & 8.77 + ngc 0450 & sabc & 5.8 & 18.876840 & -0.860974 & 1.54 & 72 & 41 & 1 & 18.70 & 11 & 8.40 + ngc 0493 & sc & 5.9 & 20.537458 & 0.945362 & 1.69 & 58 & 72 & 1 & 23.20 & 11 & 11.43 + ngc 0575 & sc & 5.3 & 22.694333 & 21.440417 & 0.85 & 0 & 21 & 1 & 41.80 & 2 & 10.32 + ngc 0598 & sc & 5.9 & 23.462042 & 30.660222 & 35.40 & 23 & 56 & 12 & 0.76 & 4 & 7.83 + ngc 0628 & sc & 5.2 & 24.173946 & 15.783661 & 5.24 & 25 & 6 & 13 & 9.91 & 14 & 15.09 + ngc 0753 & sabc & 4.9 & 29.425833 & 35.916125 & 1.26 & 128 & 50 & 15 & 67.10 & 16 & 24.52 + ngc 0783 & sc & 5.3 & 30.277542 & 31.882472 & 0.79 & 35 & 27 & 1 & 69.30 & 2 & 15.98 + ngc 0925 & scd & 7.0 & 36.820333 & 33.579167 & 5.24 & 101 & 58 & 17 & 9.29 & 18 & 14.15 + ngc 1055 & sbb & 3.1 & 40.438458 & 0.443168 & 3.79 & 105 & 69 & 1 & 14.40 & 11 & 15.89 + ngc 1058 & sc & 5.1 & 40.874988 & 37.341339 & 1.51 & 145 & 15 & 19 & 10.60 & 20 & 4.66 + ngc 1068 & sb & 3.0 & 40.669629 & -0.013281 & 3.54 & 70 & 32 & 1 & 10.10 & 11 & 10.40 + ngc 1090 & sbc & 3.8 & 41.641401 & -0.247158 & 1.99 & 102 & 64 & 1 & 35.90 & 16 & 20.79 + ngc 1097 & sbb & 3.3 & 41.579375 & -30.274889 & 4.67 & 134 & 46 & 21 & 16.50 & 2 & 22.40 + ngc 1232 & sabc & 5.0 & 47.439625 & -20.579306 & 3.71 & 90 & 30 & 22 & 21.00 & 2 & 22.64 + ngc 1313 & sbcd & 7.0 & 49.566875 & -66.498250 & 4.56 & 4 & 38 & 23 & 4.39 & 24 & 5.82 + ngc 1365 & sb & 3.2 & 53.401546 & -36.140403 & 5.61 & 42 & 46 & 25 & 19.60 & 18 & 32.00 + ngc 1512 & sa & 1.1 & 60.976167 & -43.348861 & 4.46 & 80 & 35 & 26 & 9.50 & 27 & 12.32 + ngc 1598 & sbc & 4.9 & 67.140292 & -47.782556 & 0.72 & 123 & 55 & 1 & 55.80 & 16 & 11.73 + ngc 1637 & sc & 5.0 & 70.367408 & -2.857961 & 1.99 & 31 & 40 & 19 & 12.00 & 18 & 6.95 + ngc 1642 & sc & 5.2 & 70.728792 & 0.618583 & 0.91 & 175 & 29 & 1 & 62.10 & 2 & 16.43 + ngc 1672 & sb & 3.3 & 71.427125 & -59.247278 & 3.30 & 170 & 34 & 1 & 16.70 & 2 & 16.05 + ngc 2336 & sbc & 4.0 & 111.766875 & 80.178083 & 2.51@xmath84 & 175 & 55 & 28 & 34.20 & 2 & 24.95 + ngc 2403 & sabc & 6.0 & 114.214167 & 65.602556 & 10.94 & 126 & 58 & 29 & 3.06 & 18 & 9.74 + ngc 2441 & sabb & 3.3 & 117.978083 & 73.015694 & 1.00 & 0 & 29 & 1 & 50.90 & 2 & 14.77 + ngc 2442 & sbc & 3.7 & 114.099333 & -69.530833 & 2.75 & 27 & 29 & 30 & 17.10 & 31 & 13.67 + ngc 2541 & sabc & 6.0 & 123.667148 & 49.061709 & 3.16 & 165 & 60 & 1 & 12.60 & 18 & 11.56 + ngc 2805 & sabc & 6.9 & 140.085042 & 64.102778 & 3.16 & 125 & 41 & 1 & 28.00 & 31 & 25.70 + ngc 2835 & sc & 5.0 & 139.470458 & -22.354667 & 3.30 & 160 & 45 & 32 & 10.10 & 16 & 9.71 + ngc 2841 & sb & 3.0 & 140.510975 & 50.976519 & 4.06 & 150 & 66 & 33 & 14.10 & 18 & 16.67 + ngc 2903 & sabb & 4.0 & 143.042125 & 21.500833 & 6.30 & 22 & 65 & 34 & 8.90 & 35 & 16.30 + ngc 2997 & sabc & 5.1 & 146.411625 & -31.191083 & 4.46 & 107 & 32 & 36 & 12.20 & 36 & 15.82 + ngc 3020 & sc & 5.9 & 147.527500 & 12.813639 & 1.58 & 105 & 60 & 1 & 21.90 & 11 & 10.07 + ngc 3023 & sabc & 5.5 & 147.469112 & 0.618167 & 1.44 & 70 & 60 & 1 & 29.40 & 2 & 12.33 + ngc 3031 & sab & 2.4 & 148.888221 & 69.065295 & 13.46 & 150 & 59 & 37 & 3.63 & 18 & 14.21 + ngc 3184 & sabc & 5.9 & 154.570258 & 41.424053 & 3.71 & 135 & 21 & 1 & 12.60 & 14 & 13.59 + ngc 3198 & sc & 5.2 & 154.978966 & 45.549623 & 4.26 & 35 & 67 & 1 & 14.50 & 18 & 17.95 + ngc 3227 & saba & 1.5 & 155.877412 & 19.865050 & 2.68 & 155 & 47 & 1 & 20.60 & 31 & 16.09 + ngc 3239 & ib & 9.8 & 156.270375 & 17.163583 & 2.51 & 80 & 49 & 38 & 8.10 & 31 & 5.90 + ngc 3310 & sabb & 4.0 & 159.691083 & 53.503383 & 1.54 & 163 & 39 & 39 & 19.20 & 2 & 8.63 + ngc 3319 & sbc & 6.0 & 159.789414 & 41.686675 & 3.08 & 37 & 57 & 1 & 14.10 & 18 & 12.64 + ngc 3344 & sbc & 4.0 & 160.879792 & 24.922222 & 3.54 & 156 & 25 & 40 & 6.10 & 31 & 6.28 + ngc 3351 & sb & 3.1 & 160.990417 & 11.703806 & 3.71 & 13 & 42 & 26 & 10.50 & 18 & 11.32 + ngc 3359 & sc & 5.2 & 161.653596 & 63.224236 & 3.62 & 172 & 51 & 41 & 14.40 & 42 & 15.17 + ngc 3486 & sc & 5.2 & 165.099452 & 28.975137 & 3.54 & 80 & 42 & 1 & 9.16 & 2 & 9.43 + ngc 3521 & sabb & 4.0 & 166.452421 & -0.035864 & 5.48 & 160 & 73 & 37 & 10.70 & 43 & 17.06 + ngc 3621 & sbcd & 6.9 & 169.568792 & -32.814056 & 4.89@xmath85 & 165 & 65 & 37 & 7.24 & 18 & 10.29 + ngc 3631 & sc & 5.2 & 170.261976 & 53.169569 & 2.51 & 152 & 20 & 86 & 22.2 & 2 & 16.18 + ngc 3718 & sa & 1.1 & 173.145221 & 53.067922 & 3.77@xmath86 & 15 & 65 & 44 & 17.00 & 31 & 18.63 + ngc 3820 & sbc & 3.6 & 175.520442 & 10.384253 & 0.33 & 26 & 42 & 45 & 91.30 & 2 & 8.77 + ngc 3893 & sabc & 5.2 & 177.159125 & 48.710833 & 2.23 & 165 & 52 & 1 & 18.20 & 11 & 11.82 + ngc 3938 & sc & 5.2 & 178.206042 & 44.120722 & 2.68 & 15 & 24 & 1 & 17.90 & 46 & 13.98 + ngc 4030 & sbc & 4.0 & 180.098445 & -1.100095 & 2.08 & 27 & 44 & 1 & 27.20 & 11 & 16.49 + ngc 4088 & sabc & 4.7 & 181.392458 & 50.539028 & 2.88 & 43 & 67 & 1 & 14.30 & 11 & 11.97 + ngc 4109 & sa & 1.1 & 181.713008 & 42.995642 & 0.50 & 147 & 44 & 45 & 102.80 & 2 & 14.95 + ngc 4254 & sc & 5.2 & 184.706683 & 14.416508 & 2.68 & 59 & 29 & 19 & 14.30 & 16 & 11.17 + ngc 4258 & sabb & 4.0 & 184.739600 & 47.303972 & 9.31 & 150 & 72 & 47 & 7.20 & 48 & 19.50 + ngc 4303 & sbc & 4.0 & 185.478729 & 4.473647 & 3.23 & 137 & 27 & 19 & 13.60 & 2 & 12.77 + ngc 4321 & sabb & 4.1 & 185.728462 & 15.821817 & 3.71 & 30 & 32 & 1 & 17.20 & 18 & 18.55 + ngc 4395 & sm & 8.9 & 186.453592 & 33.546928 & 6.59 & 147 & 46 & 49 & 4.30 & 50 & 8.24 + ngc 4490 & sbcd & 7.0 & 187.650996 & 41.643898 & 3.16 & 125 & 61 & 1 & 7.80 & 31 & 7.16 + ngc 4501 & sb & 3.3 & 187.996503 & 14.420387 & 3.46 & 141 & 63 & 51 & 14.10 & 52 & 14.19 + ngc 4535 & sc & 5.0 & 188.584625 & 8.197750 & 3.54 & 0 & 45 & 1 & 17.80 & 18 & 18.33 + ngc 4559 & sc & 6.0 & 188.990195 & 27.959992 & 5.36 & 143 & 67 & 53 & 7.87 & 16 & 12.27 + ngc 4625 & sabm & 8.8 & 190.469671 & 41.273964 & 1.09 & 130 & 27 & 54 & 9.20 & 18 & 2.93 + ngc 4631 & sbcd & 6.6 & 190.533375 & 32.541500 & 7.74 & 86 & 80 & 1 & 7.62 & 55 & 17.17 + ngc 4651 & sc & 5.2 & 190.927625 & 16.393389 & 1.99 & 78 & 48 & 19 & 23.60 & 56 & 13.67 + ngc 4654 & sc & 5.9 & 190.985750 & 13.126681 & 2.45 & 122 & 57 & 19 & 16.10 & 16 & 11.47 + ngc 4656 & sbm & 9.0 & 190.990531 & 32.168150 & 7.57 & 33 & 79 & 1 & 8.20 & 2 & 18.05 + ngc 4713 & scd & 6.8 & 192.491139 & 5.311405 & 1.35 & 50 & 35 & 57 & 14.90 & 11 & 5.83 + ngc 4725 & saba & 2.2 & 192.610755 & 25.500805 & 5.36 & 35 & 45 & 1 & 13.50 & 18 & 21.04 + ngc 4736 & sab & 2.4 & 192.721088 & 41.120458 & 5.61 & 116 & 37 & 58 & 4.66 & 24 & 7.60 + ngc 4861 & sm & 8.9 & 194.759754 & 34.859444 & 1.99 & 23 & 69 & 59 & 7.59 & 11 & 4.40 + ngc 5033 & sc & 5.1 & 198.364441 & 36.569936 & 5.36 & 170 & 62 & 1 & 18.70 & 16 & 29.14 + ngc 5055 & sbc & 4.0 & 198.955542 & 42.029278 & 6.30 & 101 & 64 & 33 & 7.94 & 11 & 14.54 + ngc 5068 & sc & 6.0 & 199.728375 & -21.039111 & 3.62 & 110 & 29 & 1 & 5.40 & 60 & 5.69 + ngc 5194 & sbc & 4.0 & 202.469629 & 47.195172 & 5.61 & 163 & 52 & 1 & 8.90 & 61 & 14.52 + ngc 5236 & sc & 5.0 & 204.253958 & -29.865417 & 6.44 & 46 & 24 & 58 & 4.61 & 18 & 8.64 + ngc 5248 & sabb & 4.0 & 204.383433 & 8.885178 & 3.08 & 110 & 44 & 1 & 22.90 & 2 & 20.54 + ngc 5457 & sabc & 6.0 & 210.802267 & 54.348950 & 14.42 & 37 & 18 & 62 & 6.85 & 18 & 28.73 + ngc 5474 & sc & 6.1 & 211.256708 & 53.662222 & 2.39 & 159 & 21 & 63 & 6.80 & 35 & 4.73 + ngc 5668 & scd & 6.9 & 218.351408 & 4.450458 & 1.66 & 164 & 21 & 64 & 26.90 & 31 & 12.96 + ngc 6384 & sabb & 3.6 & 263.101250 & 7.060278 & 3.08 & 32 & 48 & 19 & 25.90 & 11 & 23.23 + ngc 6691 & sbc & 3.6 & 279.801042 & 55.641806 & 0.79 & 0 & 21 & 1 & 85.10 & 2 & 19.62 + ngc 6744 & sbc & 4.0 & 287.442125 & -63.857528 & 9.98 & 20 & 50 & 65 & 9.40 & 16 & 27.28 + ngc 6946 & sabc & 5.9 & 308.718012 & 60.153914 & 5.74 & 62 & 38 & 66 & 6.00 & 67 & 10.02 + ngc 7331 & sbc & 3.9 & 339.266725 & 34.415519 & 5.24 & 169 & 75 & 28 & 15.10 & 68 & 23.00 + ngc 7495 & sabc & 5.3 & 347.238250 & 12.048028 & 0.91 & 5 & 24 & 1 & 70.00 & 69 & 18.53 + ngc 7518 & saba & 1.1 & 348.303042 & 6.321667 & 0.71 & 109 & 42 & 70 & 50.50 & 70 & 10.38 + ngc 7529 & sbc & 4.4 & 348.513292 & 8.992500 & 0.43 & 0 & 17 & 1 & 62.10 & 2 & 7.69 + ngc 7570 & sa & 1.1 & 349.186134 & 13.483011 & 0.77 & 30 & 54 & 1 & 17.70 & 16 & 3.99 + ngc 7591 & sbbc & 3.6 & 349.567833 & 6.585806 & 0.98 & 148 & 68 & 71 & 60.20 & 16 & 17.07 + ngc 7678 & sc & 4.9 & 352.116250 & 22.421194 & 1.17 & 5 & 45 & 1 & 48.90 & 2 & 16.67 + ngc 7793 & scd & 7.4 & 359.457625 & -32.591028 & 4.67 & 99 & 54 & 10 & 3.40 & 72 & 4.62 + ic 0010 & ib & 9.9 & 5.072250 & 59.303778 & 3.16 & 125 & 27 & 45 & 0.66 & 73 & 0.61 + ic 0193 & sc & 5.3 & 30.629083 & 11.093083 & 0.93 & 154 & 32 & 1 & 61.60 & 2 & 16.68 + ic 0208 & sbc & 3.6 & 32.115583 & 6.394917 & 0.91 & 0 & 12 & 1 & 38.30 & 16 & 10.14 + ic 0342 & sabc & 6.0 & 56.702096 & 68.096367 & 10.69 & 37 & 31 & 74 & 3.30 & 68 & 10.26 + ic 1132 & sc & 5.4 & 235.028171 & 20.680606 & 0.59 & 50 & 18 & 75 & 70.60 & 2 & 12.06 + ic 2204 & sab & 2.5 & 115.325435 & 34.232169 & 0.52 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 66.20 & 76 & 10.08 + ic 5201 & sc & 6.1 & 335.239333 & -46.035861 & 4.26 & 33 & 63 & 1 & 12.80 & 2 & 15.85 + ic 5309 & sb & 3.1 & 349.798542 & 8.109306 & 0.67 & 20 & 63 & 77 & 50.00 & 16 & 9.81 + ugc 00223 & i & 9.9 & 6.177915 & 14.824582 & 0.46 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 70.80 & 2 & 9.39 + ugc 01087 & sc & 5.3 & 22.860833 & 14.277500 & 0.74 & 0 & 21 & 1 & 59.60 & 2 & 12.82 + ugc 01862 & sabc & 6.4 & 36.103375 & -2.162361 & 0.83 & 10 & 39 & 1 & 20.10 & 16 & 4.85 + ugc 02023 & i & 9.7 & 37.572417 & 33.491111 & 0.83 & 59 & 26 & 78 & 10.30 & 79 & 2.49 + ugc 02216 & i & 9.9 & 41.087913 & 0.675381 & 0.64 & 15 & 72 & 1 & 36.50 & 2 & 6.84 + ugc 02345 & sm & 8.8 & 42.969583 & -1.172222 & 1.73 & 160 & 30 & 1 & 20.00 & 2 & 10.09 + ugc 03701 & sc & 6.0 & 107.927833 & 72.169306 & 0.91 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 43.20 & 2 & 11.43 + ugc 04107 & sc & 5.3 & 119.257792 & 49.567361 & 0.71 & 0 & 12 & 1 & 51.50 & 2 & 10.58 + ugc 04305 & i & 9.9 & 124.770750 & 70.720027 & 3.97 & 177 & 40 & 80 & 3.38 & 9 & 3.90 + ugc 05100 & sbb & 3.0 & 143.661008 & 5.841439 & 0.60 & 30 & 53 & 1 & 80.60 & 2 & 14.09 + ugc 06410 & sabc & 5.3 & 171.024500 & 45.811072 & 0.55 & 5 & 39 & 1 & 82.50 & 2 & 13.16 + ugc 08091 & i & 9.8 & 194.668512 & 14.217511 & 0.54 & 170 & 20 & 81 & 2.08 & 9 & 0.32 + ugc 09562 & sd & 8.0 & 222.810048 & 35.542269 & 0.48 & 30 & 27 & 1 & 23.80 & 31 & 3.31 + ugc 09837 & sabc & 5.3 & 230.965311 & 58.052941 & 0.91 & 21 & 18 & 82 & 42.00 & 82 & 11.12 + ugc 10445 & sc & 6.0 & 248.448417 & 28.984778 & 1.38 & 142 & 46 & 83 & 20.00 & 2 & 8.01 + ugc 12709 & sabm & 8.7 & 354.350001 & 0.391670 & 1.51 & 145 & 47 & 1 & 37.00 & 2 & 16.25 + pgc 29167 & i & 10.0 & 150.965417 & 68.690278 & 2.70@xmath87 & 0 & 0 & & 3.82 & 84 & 3.00 + pgc 41318 & s ? & 4.3 & 187.589848 & 56.791542 & 0.29 & 0 & 21 & 45 & 70.10 & 2 & 6.00 + pgc 44772 & s ? & 1.9 & 195.138542 & 10.129969 & 0.40 & 128 & 32 & 45 & 107.80 & 2 & 12.39 + pgc 45195 & sd & 7.7 & 196.129979 & -3.572419 & 1.77 & 63 & 44 & 1 & 24.10 & 2 & 12.44 + pgc 46182 & sc & 4.9 & 199.061225 & 41.494460 & 0.54@xmath88 & 34 & 52 & 85 & 89.40 & 76 & 14.15 + ; lccrrrrcc ngc 0012 & 8.56 @xmath73 0.02 & 0.015 @xmath73 0.042 & 0.0011 @xmath73 0.0032 & 0.033 & 7.74 @xmath73 0.04 & -0.008 @xmath73 0.087 & -0.0006 @xmath73 0.0066 & 0.068 + ngc 0055 & 8.04 @xmath73 0.05 & -0.053 @xmath73 0.094 & -0.0059 @xmath73 0.0104 & 0.075 & 6.50 @xmath73 0.07 & -0.037 @xmath73 0.131 & -0.0042 @xmath73 0.0145 & 0.091 + ngc 0099 & 8.55 @xmath73 0.04 & -0.319 @xmath73 0.072 & -0.0202 @xmath73 0.0045 & 0.055 & 7.70 @xmath73 0.07 & -0.666 @xmath73 0.137 & -0.0422 @xmath73 0.0087 & 0.105 + ngc 0224 & 8.72 @xmath73 0.02 & -0.352 @xmath73 0.039 & -0.0172 @xmath73 0.0019 & 0.077 & 8.17 @xmath73 0.04 & -0.996 @xmath73 0.072 & -0.0486 @xmath73 0.0035 & 0.136 + ngc 0234 & 8.65 @xmath73 0.01 & -0.154 @xmath73 0.022 & -0.0109 @xmath73 0.0015 & 0.027 & 7.91 @xmath73 0.02 & -0.329 @xmath73 0.046 & -0.0234 @xmath73 0.0033 & 0.058 + ngc 0253 & 8.55 @xmath73 0.13 & -0.125 @xmath73 0.164 & -0.0090 @xmath73 0.0119 & 0.055 & 7.60 @xmath73 0.35 & -0.241 @xmath73 0.441 & -0.0174 @xmath73 0.0319 & 0.149 + ngc 0300 & 8.51 @xmath73 0.02 & -0.519 @xmath73 0.040 & -0.0842 @xmath73 0.0065 & 0.069 & 7.47 @xmath73 0.04 & -0.955 @xmath73 0.080 & -0.1548 @xmath73 0.0129 & 0.130 + ngc 0428 & 8.20 @xmath73 0.06 & -0.035 @xmath73 0.109 & -0.0040 @xmath73 0.0124 & 0.059 & 6.95 @xmath73 0.11 & -0.118 @xmath73 0.184 & -0.0135 @xmath73 0.0210 & 0.099 + ngc 0450 & 8.35 @xmath73 0.03 & -0.285 @xmath73 0.057 & -0.0340 @xmath73 0.0067 & 0.046 & 7.24 @xmath73 0.06 & -0.589 @xmath73 0.112 & -0.0702 @xmath73 0.0133 & 0.092 + ngc 0493 & 8.51 @xmath73 0.04 & -0.450 @xmath73 0.070 & -0.0393 @xmath73 0.0061 & 0.053 & 7.53 @xmath73 0.07 & -0.893 @xmath73 0.124 & -0.0780 @xmath73 0.0109 & 0.093 + ngc 0575 & 8.58 @xmath73 0.01 & -0.195 @xmath73 0.026 & -0.0189 @xmath73 0.0025 & 0.026 & 7.82 @xmath73 0.03 & -0.530 @xmath73 0.061 & -0.0514 @xmath73 0.0059 & 0.060 + ngc 0598 & 8.48 @xmath73 0.02 & -0.359 @xmath73 0.041 & -0.0459 @xmath73 0.0053 & 0.073 & 7.47 @xmath73 0.04 & -0.691 @xmath73 0.084 & -0.0883 @xmath73 0.0107 & 0.145 + ngc 0628 & 8.78 @xmath73 0.01 & -0.572 @xmath73 0.027 & -0.0379 @xmath73 0.0018 & 0.060 & 8.17 @xmath73 0.03 & -1.292 @xmath73 0.064 & -0.0856 @xmath73 0.0042 & 0.137 + ngc 0753 & 8.67 @xmath73 0.08 & -0.212 @xmath73 0.106 & -0.0087 @xmath73 0.0043 & 0.065 & 8.01 @xmath73 0.20 & -0.399 @xmath73 0.290 & -0.0163 @xmath73 0.0118 & 0.177 + ngc 0783 & 8.68 @xmath73 0.07 & -0.189 @xmath73 0.104 & -0.0118 @xmath73 0.0056 & 0.031 & 7.91 @xmath73 0.30 & -0.274 @xmath73 0.434 & -0.0171 @xmath73 0.0272 & 0.130 + ngc 0925 & 8.48 @xmath73 0.02 & -0.473 @xmath73 0.037 & -0.0334 @xmath73 0.0026 & 0.067 & 7.45 @xmath73 0.04 & -0.941 @xmath73 0.071 & -0.0665 @xmath73 0.0050 & 0.128 + ngc 1055 & 8.62 @xmath73 0.04 & -0.140 @xmath73 0.100 & -0.0088 @xmath73 0.0063 & 0.059 & 7.89 @xmath73 0.05 & -0.414 @xmath73 0.118 & -0.0261 @xmath73 0.0074 & 0.070 + ngc 1058 & 8.62 @xmath73 0.01 & -0.352 @xmath73 0.027 & -0.0757 @xmath73 0.0058 & 0.055 & 7.72 @xmath73 0.03 & -0.751 @xmath73 0.069 & -0.1613 @xmath73 0.0149 & 0.137 + ngc 1068 & 8.64 @xmath73 0.02 & -0.121 @xmath73 0.051 & -0.0116 @xmath73 0.0049 & 0.070 & 7.94 @xmath73 0.04 & -0.141 @xmath73 0.100 & -0.0136 @xmath73 0.0096 & 0.126 + ngc 1090 & 8.61 @xmath73 0.03 & -0.284 @xmath73 0.103 & -0.0137 @xmath73 0.0050 & 0.026 & 7.89 @xmath73 0.04 & -0.775 @xmath73 0.131 & -0.0373 @xmath73 0.0063 & 0.033 + ngc 1097 & 8.74 @xmath73 0.01 & -0.357 @xmath73 0.054 & -0.0159 @xmath73 0.0024 & 0.030 & 8.25 @xmath73 0.05 & -0.997 @xmath73 0.209 & -0.0445 @xmath73 0.0093 & 0.114 + ngc 1232 & 8.78 @xmath73 0.04 & -0.573 @xmath73 0.068 & -0.0253 @xmath73 0.0030 & 0.040 & 8.12 @xmath73 0.10 & -1.166 @xmath73 0.172 & -0.0515 @xmath73 0.0076 & 0.103 + ngc 1313 & 8.21 @xmath73 0.03 & -0.159 @xmath73 0.051 & -0.0273 @xmath73 0.0087 & 0.071 & 6.84 @xmath73 0.05 & -0.269 @xmath73 0.096 & -0.0462 @xmath73 0.0165 & 0.132 + ngc 1365 & 8.64 @xmath73 0.02 & -0.253 @xmath73 0.033 & -0.0079 @xmath73 0.0010 & 0.064 & 7.91 @xmath73 0.04 & -0.622 @xmath73 0.080 & -0.0193 @xmath73 0.0024 & 0.137 + ngc 1512 & 8.79 @xmath73 0.03 & -0.461 @xmath73 0.048 & -0.0374 @xmath73 0.0039 & 0.066 & 8.42 @xmath73 0.05 & -1.410 @xmath73 0.083 & -0.1144 @xmath73 0.0067 & 0.115 + ngc 1598 & 8.74 @xmath73 0.03 & -0.402 @xmath73 0.062 & -0.0343 @xmath73 0.0053 & 0.042 & 8.20 @xmath73 0.09 & -1.014 @xmath73 0.178 & -0.0865 @xmath73 0.0152 & 0.122 + ngc 1637 & 8.64 @xmath73 0.01 & -0.115 @xmath73 0.023 & -0.0165 @xmath73 0.0034 & 0.062 & 7.78 @xmath73 0.03 & -0.170 @xmath73 0.067 & -0.0236 @xmath73 0.0096 & 0.160 + ngc 1642 & 8.64 @xmath73 0.01 & -0.154 @xmath73 0.024 & -0.0094 @xmath73 0.0015 & 0.030 & 7.86 @xmath73 0.02 & -0.244 @xmath73 0.050 & -0.0148 @xmath73 0.0031 & 0.062 + ngc 1672 & 8.67 @xmath73 0.02 & -0.216 @xmath73 0.070 & -0.0135 @xmath73 0.0044 & 0.055 & 8.00 @xmath73 0.05 & -0.464 @xmath73 0.158 & -0.0290 @xmath73 0.0098 & 0.119 + ngc 2336 & 8.80 @xmath73 0.04 & -0.390 @xmath73 0.056 & -0.0156 @xmath73 0.0022 & 0.041 & 8.14 @xmath73 0.08 & -0.725 @xmath73 0.121 & -0.0290 @xmath73 0.0049 & 0.088 + ngc 2403 & 8.48 @xmath73 0.02 & -0.524 @xmath73 0.043 & -0.0538 @xmath73 0.0044 & 0.079 & 7.47 @xmath73 0.03 & -1.005 @xmath73 0.069 & -0.1032 @xmath73 0.0071 & 0.128 + ngc 2441 & 8.54 @xmath73 0.01 & 0.017 @xmath73 0.040 & 0.0011 @xmath73 0.0027 & 0.036 & 7.67 @xmath73 0.03 & 0.100 @xmath73 0.080 & 0.0068 @xmath73 0.0054 & 0.072 + ngc 2442 & 8.64 @xmath73 0.05 & -0.079 @xmath73 0.072 & -0.0058 @xmath73 0.0052 & 0.030 & 7.87 @xmath73 0.14 & -0.119 @xmath73 0.204 & -0.0087 @xmath73 0.0150 & 0.087 + ngc 2541 & 8.45 @xmath73 0.02 & -0.608 @xmath73 0.053 & -0.0526 @xmath73 0.0046 & 0.030 & 0.00 @xmath73 0.00 & 0.000 @xmath73 0.000 & 0.0000 @xmath73 0.0000 & 0.000 + ngc 2805 & 8.51 @xmath73 0.03 & -0.432 @xmath73 0.045 & -0.0168 @xmath73 0.0017 & 0.040 & 7.53 @xmath73 0.06 & -0.869 @xmath73 0.096 & -0.0338 @xmath73 0.0037 & 0.087 + ngc 2835 & 8.50 @xmath73 0.04 & -0.314 @xmath73 0.060 & -0.0324 @xmath73 0.0062 & 0.057 & 7.51 @xmath73 0.10 & -0.633 @xmath73 0.149 & -0.0652 @xmath73 0.0154 & 0.142 + ngc 2841 & 8.99 @xmath73 0.08 & -0.607 @xmath73 0.172 & -0.0363 @xmath73 0.0103 & 0.022 & 8.81 @xmath73 0.20 & -1.488 @xmath73 0.450 & -0.0890 @xmath73 0.0269 & 0.052 + ngc 2903 & 8.82 @xmath73 0.03 & -0.523 @xmath73 0.072 & -0.0321 @xmath73 0.0044 & 0.061 & 8.51 @xmath73 0.06 & -1.588 @xmath73 0.152 & -0.0975 @xmath73 0.0093 & 0.121 + ngc 2997 & 8.80 @xmath73 0.06 & -0.502 @xmath73 0.121 & -0.0318 @xmath73 0.0076 & 0.060 & 8.44 @xmath73 0.13 & -1.503 @xmath73 0.274 & -0.0950 @xmath73 0.0173 & 0.129 + ngc 3020 & 8.39 @xmath73 0.02 & -0.558 @xmath73 0.041 & -0.0554 @xmath73 0.0041 & 0.011 & 7.27 @xmath73 0.07 & -1.053 @xmath73 0.167 & -0.1045 @xmath73 0.0167 & 0.045 + ngc 3023 & 8.34 @xmath73 0.08 & -0.444 @xmath73 0.201 & -0.0361 @xmath73 0.0163 & 0.054 & 7.20 @xmath73 0.14 & -0.889 @xmath73 0.372 & -0.0722 @xmath73 0.0302 & 0.100 + ngc 3031 & 8.58 @xmath73 0.02 & -0.156 @xmath73 0.045 & -0.0110 @xmath73 0.0032 & 0.043 & 7.84 @xmath73 0.06 & -0.464 @xmath73 0.116 & -0.0327 @xmath73 0.0081 & 0.110 + ngc 3184 & 8.66 @xmath73 0.02 & -0.176 @xmath73 0.037 & -0.0130 @xmath73 0.0027 & 0.066 & 7.86 @xmath73 0.04 & -0.338 @xmath73 0.086 & -0.0249 @xmath73 0.0063 & 0.137 + ngc 3198 & 8.60 @xmath73 0.04 & -0.425 @xmath73 0.076 & -0.0237 @xmath73 0.0042 & 0.063 & 7.94 @xmath73 0.11 & -1.145 @xmath73 0.317 & -0.0638 @xmath73 0.0176 & 0.091 + ngc 3227 & 8.64 @xmath73 0.05 & -0.254 @xmath73 0.077 & -0.0158 @xmath73 0.0048 & 0.056 & 0.00 @xmath73 0.00 & 0.000 @xmath73 0.000 & 0.0000 @xmath73 0.0000 & 0.000 + ngc 3239 & 8.12 @xmath73 0.01 & -0.153 @xmath73 0.012 & -0.0260 @xmath73 0.0021 & 0.005 & 6.78 @xmath73 0.04 & -0.275 @xmath73 0.064 & -0.0467 @xmath73 0.0108 & 0.026 + ngc 3310 & 8.37 @xmath73 0.01 & -0.101 @xmath73 0.023 & -0.0117 @xmath73 0.0027 & 0.040 & 7.27 @xmath73 0.02 & -0.254 @xmath73 0.060 & -0.0295 @xmath73 0.0070 & 0.104 + ngc 3319 & 8.50 @xmath73 0.02 & -0.516 @xmath73 0.043 & -0.0408 @xmath73 0.0034 & 0.024 & 0.00 @xmath73 0.00 & 0.000 @xmath73 0.000 & 0.0000 @xmath73 0.0000 & 0.000 + ngc 3344 & 8.72 @xmath73 0.02 & -0.618 @xmath73 0.039 & -0.0984 @xmath73 0.0063 & 0.029 & 8.08 @xmath73 0.17 & -1.413 @xmath73 0.252 & -0.2254 @xmath73 0.0407 & 0.044 + ngc 3351 & 8.82 @xmath73 0.01 & -0.210 @xmath73 0.031 & -0.0186 @xmath73 0.0027 & 0.038 & 8.51 @xmath73 0.03 & -0.678 @xmath73 0.094 & -0.0599 @xmath73 0.0083 & 0.116 + ngc 3359 & 8.40 @xmath73 0.06 & -0.271 @xmath73 0.108 & -0.0179 @xmath73 0.0071 & 0.099 & 7.43 @xmath73 0.09 & -0.688 @xmath73 0.154 & -0.0453 @xmath73 0.0102 & 0.130 + ngc 3486 & 8.60 @xmath73 0.02 & -0.421 @xmath73 0.043 & -0.0447 @xmath73 0.0046 & 0.018 & 7.80 @xmath73 0.04 & -0.928 @xmath73 0.088 & -0.0985 @xmath73 0.0094 & 0.036 + ngc 3521 & 8.83 @xmath73 0.04 & -0.666 @xmath73 0.096 & -0.0390 @xmath73 0.0056 & 0.048 & 0.00 @xmath73 0.00 & 0.000 @xmath73 0.000 & 0.0000 @xmath73 0.0000 & 0.000 + ngc 3621 & 8.68 @xmath73 0.02 & -0.460 @xmath73 0.035 & -0.0446 @xmath73 0.0034 & 0.050 & 8.05 @xmath73 0.05 & -1.298 @xmath73 0.095 & -0.1260 @xmath73 0.0092 & 0.133 + ngc 3631 & 8.71 @xmath73 0.03 & -0.414 @xmath73 0.077 & -0.0256 @xmath73 0.0048 & 0.024 & 7.94 @xmath73 0.05 & -0.719 @xmath73 0.145 & -0.0445 @xmath73 0.0090 & 0.046 + ngc 3718 & 8.60 @xmath73 0.19 & -0.221 @xmath73 0.253 & -0.0119 @xmath73 0.0136 & 0.066 & 0.00 @xmath73 0.00 & 0.000 @xmath73 0.000 & 0.0000 @xmath73 0.0000 & 0.000 + ngc 3820 & 8.64 @xmath73 0.01 & -0.102 @xmath73 0.019 & -0.0116 @xmath73 0.0022 & 0.019 & 7.92 @xmath73 0.05 & -0.342 @xmath73 0.093 & -0.0389 @xmath73 0.0105 & 0.092 + ngc 3893 & 8.73 @xmath73 0.16 & -0.437 @xmath73 0.254 & -0.0371 @xmath73 0.0215 & 0.028 & 0.00 @xmath73 0.00 & 0.000 @xmath73 0.000 & 0.0000 @xmath73 0.0000 & 0.000 + ngc 3938 & 8.79 @xmath73 0.05 & -0.577 @xmath73 0.092 & -0.0413 @xmath73 0.0066 & 0.031 & 8.15 @xmath73 0.07 & -1.204 @xmath73 0.141 & -0.0861 @xmath73 0.0101 & 0.048 + ngc 4030 & 8.77 @xmath73 0.02 & -0.258 @xmath73 0.036 & -0.0156 @xmath73 0.0022 & 0.010 & 8.05 @xmath73 0.08 & -0.344 @xmath73 0.177 & -0.0208 @xmath73 0.0107 & 0.052 + ngc 4088 & 8.71 @xmath73 0.04 & -0.366 @xmath73 0.093 & -0.0305 @xmath73 0.0078 & 0.025 & 7.97 @xmath73 0.06 & -0.698 @xmath73 0.116 & -0.0582 @xmath73 0.0097 & 0.032 + ngc 4109 & 8.63 @xmath73 0.03 & -0.402 @xmath73 0.099 & -0.0269 @xmath73 0.0066 & 0.056 & 7.87 @xmath73 0.05 & -1.152 @xmath73 0.154 & -0.0770 @xmath73 0.0103 & 0.081 + ngc 4254 & 8.77 @xmath73 0.02 & -0.353 @xmath73 0.034 & -0.0316 @xmath73 0.0031 & 0.036 & 8.09 @xmath73 0.05 & -0.716 @xmath73 0.100 & -0.0641 @xmath73 0.0090 & 0.106 + ngc 4258 & 8.54 @xmath73 0.03 & -0.161 @xmath73 0.073 & -0.0083 @xmath73 0.0037 & 0.031 & 7.59 @xmath73 0.13 & -0.232 @xmath73 0.282 & -0.0119 @xmath73 0.0144 & 0.120 + ngc 4303 & 8.78 @xmath73 0.03 & -0.577 @xmath73 0.073 & -0.0452 @xmath73 0.0057 & 0.062 & 8.24 @xmath73 0.08 & -1.370 @xmath73 0.189 & -0.1073 @xmath73 0.0148 & 0.156 + ngc 4321 & 8.74 @xmath73 0.03 & -0.219 @xmath73 0.048 & -0.0118 @xmath73 0.0026 & 0.038 & 8.04 @xmath73 0.06 & -0.355 @xmath73 0.104 & -0.0192 @xmath73 0.0056 & 0.083 + ngc 4395 & 8.19 @xmath73 0.05 & -0.164 @xmath73 0.082 & -0.0200 @xmath73 0.0100 & 0.079 & 6.89 @xmath73 0.08 & -0.346 @xmath73 0.143 & -0.0420 @xmath73 0.0174 & 0.136 + ngc 4490 & 8.29 @xmath73 0.08 & -0.318 @xmath73 0.254 & -0.0444 @xmath73 0.0355 & 0.058 & 7.09 @xmath73 0.15 & -0.560 @xmath73 0.449 & -0.0781 @xmath73 0.0629 & 0.102 + ngc 4501 & 8.92 @xmath73 0.12 & -0.424 @xmath73 0.242 & -0.0299 @xmath73 0.0171 & 0.054 & 0.00 @xmath73 0.00 & 0.000 @xmath73 0.000 & 0.0000 @xmath73 0.0000 & 0.000 + ngc 4535 & 8.71 @xmath73 0.03 & -0.299 @xmath73 0.064 & -0.0163 @xmath73 0.0035 & 0.025 & 7.97 @xmath73 0.03 & -0.594 @xmath73 0.055 & -0.0324 @xmath73 0.0030 & 0.022 + ngc 4559 & 8.53 @xmath73 0.03 & -0.573 @xmath73 0.056 & -0.0467 @xmath73 0.0046 & 0.047 & 0.00 @xmath73 0.00 & 0.000 @xmath73 0.000 & 0.0000 @xmath73 0.0000 & 0.000 + ngc 4625 & 8.58 @xmath73 0.01 & -0.130 @xmath73 0.044 & -0.0443 @xmath73 0.0151 & 0.042 & 7.84 @xmath73 0.05 & -0.680 @xmath73 0.143 & -0.2318 @xmath73 0.0488 & 0.127 + ngc 4631 & 8.39 @xmath73 0.06 & -0.333 @xmath73 0.125 & -0.0194 @xmath73 0.0073 & 0.077 & 7.18 @xmath73 0.09 & -0.480 @xmath73 0.169 & -0.0280 @xmath73 0.0098 & 0.093 + ngc 4651 & 8.68 @xmath73 0.04 & -0.469 @xmath73 0.096 & -0.0343 @xmath73 0.0070 & 0.049 & 8.02 @xmath73 0.10 & -1.133 @xmath73 0.233 & -0.0829 @xmath73 0.0170 & 0.119 + ngc 4654 & 8.66 @xmath73 0.04 & -0.364 @xmath73 0.083 & -0.0318 @xmath73 0.0073 & 0.044 & 7.90 @xmath73 0.11 & -0.797 @xmath73 0.229 & -0.0695 @xmath73 0.0200 & 0.120 + ngc 4656 & 8.06 @xmath73 0.16 & -0.551 @xmath73 0.280 & -0.0305 @xmath73 0.0155 & 0.084 & 6.62 @xmath73 0.24 & -0.634 @xmath73 0.409 & -0.0351 @xmath73 0.0227 & 0.123 + ngc 4713 & 8.53 @xmath73 0.09 & -0.771 @xmath73 0.250 & -0.1325 @xmath73 0.0428 & 0.095 & 7.60 @xmath73 0.14 & -1.548 @xmath73 0.397 & -0.2662 @xmath73 0.0679 & 0.150 + ngc 4725 & 8.83 @xmath73 0.37 & -0.472 @xmath73 0.853 & -0.0223 @xmath73 0.0404 & 0.070 & 0.00 @xmath73 0.00 & 0.000 @xmath73 0.000 & 0.0000 @xmath73 0.0000 & 0.000 + ngc 4736 & 8.57 @xmath73 0.03 & -0.066 @xmath73 0.170 & -0.0086 @xmath73 0.0224 & 0.065 & 0.00 @xmath73 0.00 & 0.000 @xmath73 0.000 & 0.0000 @xmath73 0.0000 & 0.000 + ngc 4861 & 8.00 @xmath73 0.06 & -0.013 @xmath73 0.092 & -0.0030 @xmath73 0.0210 & 0.090 & 6.54 @xmath73 0.13 & -0.058 @xmath73 0.200 & -0.0132 @xmath73 0.0454 & 0.193 + ngc 5033 & 8.64 @xmath73 0.06 & -0.278 @xmath73 0.094 & -0.0095 @xmath73 0.0032 & 0.090 & 8.00 @xmath73 0.10 & -0.599 @xmath73 0.130 & -0.0206 @xmath73 0.0045 & 0.072 + ngc 5055 & 8.87 @xmath73 0.02 & -0.490 @xmath73 0.031 & -0.0337 @xmath73 0.0021 & 0.007 & 8.42 @xmath73 0.10 & -1.259 @xmath73 0.186 & -0.0867 @xmath73 0.0129 & 0.044 + ngc 5068 & 8.57 @xmath73 0.04 & -0.355 @xmath73 0.098 & -0.0626 @xmath73 0.0173 & 0.050 & 7.53 @xmath73 0.11 & -0.451 @xmath73 0.263 & -0.0794 @xmath73 0.0463 & 0.134 + ngc 5194 & 8.88 @xmath73 0.03 & -0.324 @xmath73 0.053 & -0.0223 @xmath73 0.0037 & 0.062 & 8.52 @xmath73 0.05 & -0.704 @xmath73 0.102 & -0.0484 @xmath73 0.0070 & 0.117 + ngc 5236 & 8.78 @xmath73 0.01 & -0.221 @xmath73 0.028 & -0.0256 @xmath73 0.0032 & 0.050 & 8.34 @xmath73 0.03 & -0.649 @xmath73 0.058 & -0.0752 @xmath73 0.0068 & 0.104 + ngc 5248 & 8.64 @xmath73 0.03 & -0.142 @xmath73 0.076 & -0.0069 @xmath73 0.0037 & 0.072 & 7.74 @xmath73 0.05 & -0.132 @xmath73 0.155 & -0.0064 @xmath73 0.0075 & 0.146 + ngc 5457 & 8.71 @xmath73 0.01 & -0.840 @xmath73 0.029 & -0.0293 @xmath73 0.0010 & 0.076 & 8.01 @xmath73 0.03 & -1.760 @xmath73 0.056 & -0.0613 @xmath73 0.0020 & 0.142 + ngc 5474 & 8.19 @xmath73 0.02 & -0.008 @xmath73 0.086 & -0.0019 @xmath73 0.0182 & 0.100 & 6.82 @xmath73 0.03 & -0.261 @xmath73 0.144 & -0.0553 @xmath73 0.0303 & 0.156 + ngc 5668 & 8.52 @xmath73 0.03 & -0.471 @xmath73 0.061 & -0.0364 @xmath73 0.0047 & 0.075 & 7.48 @xmath73 0.05 & -1.032 @xmath73 0.127 & -0.0796 @xmath73 0.0098 & 0.147 + ngc 6384 & 8.87 @xmath73 0.04 & -0.531 @xmath73 0.068 & -0.0228 @xmath73 0.0029 & 0.029 & 8.41 @xmath73 0.12 & -1.172 @xmath73 0.197 & -0.0504 @xmath73 0.0084 & 0.083 + ngc 6691 & 8.66 @xmath73 0.02 & -0.152 @xmath73 0.052 & -0.0077 @xmath73 0.0026 & 0.050 & 7.98 @xmath73 0.06 & -0.414 @xmath73 0.157 & -0.0211 @xmath73 0.0080 & 0.142 + ngc 6744 & 8.88 @xmath73 0.03 & -0.726 @xmath73 0.060 & -0.0266 @xmath73 0.0022 & 0.034 & 8.66 @xmath73 0.07 & -1.996 @xmath73 0.157 & -0.0731 @xmath73 0.0057 & 0.087 + ngc 6946 & 8.72 @xmath73 0.06 & -0.337 @xmath73 0.099 & -0.0337 @xmath73 0.0099 & 0.061 & 8.05 @xmath73 0.15 & -0.751 @xmath73 0.237 & -0.0751 @xmath73 0.0237 & 0.148 + ngc 7331 & 8.67 @xmath73 0.08 & -0.222 @xmath73 0.193 & -0.0097 @xmath73 0.0084 & 0.044 & 7.75 @xmath73 0.09 & -0.056 @xmath73 0.213 & -0.0024 @xmath73 0.0092 & 0.048 + ngc 7495 & 8.61 @xmath73 0.01 & -0.260 @xmath73 0.027 & -0.0140 @xmath73 0.0015 & 0.028 & 7.83 @xmath73 0.02 & -0.616 @xmath73 0.062 & -0.0333 @xmath73 0.0033 & 0.064 + ngc 7518 & 8.74 @xmath73 0.02 & -0.127 @xmath73 0.045 & -0.0122 @xmath73 0.0043 & 0.034 & 8.30 @xmath73 0.07 & -0.514 @xmath73 0.136 & -0.0496 @xmath73 0.0131 & 0.104 + ngc 7529 & 8.64 @xmath73 0.04 & -0.232 @xmath73 0.067 & -0.0303 @xmath73 0.0087 & 0.040 & 7.97 @xmath73 0.13 & -0.752 @xmath73 0.223 & -0.0979 @xmath73 0.0290 & 0.133 + ngc 7570 & 8.58 @xmath73 0.03 & -0.086 @xmath73 0.045 & -0.0217 @xmath73 0.0114 & 0.029 & 7.78 @xmath73 0.06 & -0.219 @xmath73 0.106 & -0.0549 @xmath73 0.0265 & 0.068 + ngc 7591 & 8.71 @xmath73 0.01 & -0.146 @xmath73 0.029 & -0.0085 @xmath73 0.0017 & 0.024 & 8.13 @xmath73 0.06 & -0.400 @xmath73 0.114 & -0.0234 @xmath73 0.0066 & 0.093 + ngc 7678 & 8.55 @xmath73 0.04 & -0.079 @xmath73 0.078 & -0.0048 @xmath73 0.0047 & 0.030 & 7.64 @xmath73 0.14 & -0.081 @xmath73 0.248 & -0.0049 @xmath73 0.0149 & 0.094 + ngc 7793 & 8.50 @xmath73 0.02 & -0.305 @xmath73 0.048 & -0.0662 @xmath73 0.0104 & 0.071 & 7.52 @xmath73 0.05 & -0.752 @xmath73 0.095 & -0.1631 @xmath73 0.0207 & 0.135 + ic 0010 & 8.14 @xmath73 0.08 & 0.252 @xmath73 0.185 & 0.4294 @xmath73 0.3025 & 0.094 & 6.90 @xmath73 0.15 & 0.355 @xmath73 0.338 & 0.6035 @xmath73 0.5534 & 0.165 + ic 0193 & 8.59 @xmath73 0.02 & -0.139 @xmath73 0.064 & -0.0083 @xmath73 0.0039 & 0.039 & 7.80 @xmath73 0.05 & -0.306 @xmath73 0.151 & -0.0183 @xmath73 0.0090 & 0.092 + ic 0208 & 8.58 @xmath73 0.01 & -0.168 @xmath73 0.035 & -0.0165 @xmath73 0.0034 & 0.036 & 7.78 @xmath73 0.03 & -0.422 @xmath73 0.083 & -0.0416 @xmath73 0.0082 & 0.086 + ic 0342 & 8.83 @xmath73 0.04 & -0.513 @xmath73 0.087 & -0.0500 @xmath73 0.0085 & 0.045 & 8.46 @xmath73 0.07 & -1.465 @xmath73 0.131 & -0.1426 @xmath73 0.0128 & 0.068 + ic 1132 & 8.65 @xmath73 0.03 & -0.390 @xmath73 0.059 & -0.0323 @xmath73 0.0049 & 0.077 & 7.69 @xmath73 0.06 & -0.598 @xmath73 0.106 & -0.0495 @xmath73 0.0087 & 0.128 + ic 2204 & 8.62 @xmath73 0.01 & -0.160 @xmath73 0.033 & -0.0159 @xmath73 0.0033 & 0.024 & 7.89 @xmath73 0.03 & -0.387 @xmath73 0.086 & -0.0384 @xmath73 0.0086 & 0.064 + ic 5201 & 8.35 @xmath73 0.07 & -0.501 @xmath73 0.147 & -0.0316 @xmath73 0.0093 & 0.074 & 7.19 @xmath73 0.12 & -0.908 @xmath73 0.242 & -0.0573 @xmath73 0.0153 & 0.122 + ic 5309 & 8.70 @xmath73 0.03 & -0.058 @xmath73 0.066 & -0.0059 @xmath73 0.0067 & 0.059 & 8.08 @xmath73 0.09 & -0.211 @xmath73 0.206 & -0.0215 @xmath73 0.0210 & 0.170 + ugc 00223 & 8.53 @xmath73 0.02 & -0.099 @xmath73 0.053 & -0.0105 @xmath73 0.0057 & 0.029 & 7.72 @xmath73 0.06 & -0.295 @xmath73 0.152 & -0.0313 @xmath73 0.0162 & 0.084 + ugc 01087 & 8.60 @xmath73 0.01 & -0.246 @xmath73 0.023 & -0.0192 @xmath73 0.0018 & 0.026 & 7.83 @xmath73 0.03 & -0.609 @xmath73 0.058 & -0.0475 @xmath73 0.0045 & 0.066 + ugc 01862 & 8.43 @xmath73 0.02 & -0.094 @xmath73 0.039 & -0.0194 @xmath73 0.0081 & 0.040 & 7.42 @xmath73 0.04 & -0.316 @xmath73 0.090 & -0.0651 @xmath73 0.0186 & 0.092 + ugc 02023 & 8.13 @xmath73 0.19 & -0.088 @xmath73 0.280 & -0.0358 @xmath73 0.1128 & 0.075 & 6.84 @xmath73 0.29 & -0.197 @xmath73 0.434 & -0.0800 @xmath73 0.1752 & 0.115 + ugc 02216 & 8.08 @xmath73 0.02 & -0.068 @xmath73 0.052 & -0.0099 @xmath73 0.0077 & 0.024 & 6.72 @xmath73 0.04 & -0.124 @xmath73 0.094 & -0.0181 @xmath73 0.0137 & 0.041 + ugc 02345 & 8.04 @xmath73 0.03 & -0.893 @xmath73 0.085 & -0.0885 @xmath73 0.0084 & 0.041 & 6.63 @xmath73 0.11 & -0.846 @xmath73 0.255 & -0.0838 @xmath73 0.0253 & 0.131 + ugc 03701 & 8.41 @xmath73 0.01 & -0.087 @xmath73 0.046 & -0.0076 @xmath73 0.0040 & 0.042 & 7.41 @xmath73 0.03 & -0.329 @xmath73 0.102 & -0.0288 @xmath73 0.0089 & 0.092 + ugc 04107 & 8.56 @xmath73 0.01 & -0.231 @xmath73 0.041 & -0.0219 @xmath73 0.0039 & 0.045 & 7.72 @xmath73 0.03 & -0.498 @xmath73 0.087 & -0.0470 @xmath73 0.0083 & 0.096 + ugc 04305 & 7.89 @xmath73 0.07 & -0.225 @xmath73 0.137 & -0.0573 @xmath73 0.0352 & 0.075 & 6.41 @xmath73 0.13 & -0.307 @xmath73 0.246 & -0.0784 @xmath73 0.0629 & 0.139 + ugc 05100 & 8.58 @xmath73 0.05 & -0.078 @xmath73 0.075 & -0.0056 @xmath73 0.0053 & 0.047 & 7.90 @xmath73 0.13 & -0.220 @xmath73 0.204 & -0.0156 @xmath73 0.0145 & 0.119 + ugc 06410 & 8.58 @xmath73 0.02 & -0.148 @xmath73 0.040 & -0.0113 @xmath73 0.0031 & 0.057 & 7.78 @xmath73 0.05 & -0.454 @xmath73 0.093 & -0.0345 @xmath73 0.0071 & 0.123 + ugc 08091 & 7.58 @xmath73 0.04 & 0.177 @xmath73 0.067 & 0.5487 @xmath73 0.2003 & 0.055 & 6.03 @xmath73 0.08 & 0.255 @xmath73 0.129 & 0.7891 @xmath73 0.3905 & 0.108 + ugc 09562 & 8.22 @xmath73 0.05 & -0.193 @xmath73 0.143 & -0.0585 @xmath73 0.0433 & 0.080 & 6.80 @xmath73 0.06 & -0.206 @xmath73 0.144 & -0.0626 @xmath73 0.0437 & 0.068 + ugc 09837 & 8.45 @xmath73 0.02 & -0.412 @xmath73 0.076 & -0.0370 @xmath73 0.0068 & 0.078 & 7.32 @xmath73 0.04 & -0.820 @xmath73 0.140 & -0.0738 @xmath73 0.0126 & 0.141 + ugc 10445 & 8.27 @xmath73 0.04 & -0.082 @xmath73 0.077 & -0.0103 @xmath73 0.0096 & 0.050 & 7.03 @xmath73 0.08 & -0.197 @xmath73 0.141 & -0.0246 @xmath73 0.0176 & 0.091 + ugc 12709 & 8.47 @xmath73 0.08 & -0.706 @xmath73 0.218 & -0.0434 @xmath73 0.0134 & 0.082 & 7.30 @xmath73 0.15 & -1.089 @xmath73 0.418 & -0.0669 @xmath73 0.0257 & 0.157 + pgc 29167 & 8.34 @xmath73 0.10 & 0.152 @xmath73 0.169 & 0.0507 @xmath73 0.0565 & 0.040 & 7.25 @xmath73 0.01 & 0.005 @xmath73 0.020 & 0.0017 @xmath73 0.0065 & 0.005 + pgc 41318 & 8.45 @xmath73 0.04 & -0.168 @xmath73 0.143 & -0.0281 @xmath73 0.0239 & 0.033 & 7.28 @xmath73 0.17 & -0.563 @xmath73 0.568 & -0.0941 @xmath73 0.0945 & 0.130 + pgc 44772 & 8.59 @xmath73 0.03 & -0.268 @xmath73 0.045 & -0.0216 @xmath73 0.0036 & 0.043 & 7.79 @xmath73 0.07 & -0.705 @xmath73 0.115 & -0.0569 @xmath73 0.0093 & 0.109 + pgc 45195 & 8.14 @xmath73 0.04 & -0.152 @xmath73 0.059 & -0.0122 @xmath73 0.0047 & 0.035 & 6.81 @xmath73 0.08 & -0.277 @xmath73 0.104 & -0.0223 @xmath73 0.0084 & 0.061 + pgc 46182 & 8.59 @xmath73 0.03 & -0.126 @xmath73 0.078 & -0.0089 @xmath73 0.0055 & 0.035 & 7.92 @xmath73 0.11 & -0.462 @xmath73 0.313 & -0.0327 @xmath73 0.0221 & 0.141 + ll ngc 0012 & @xcite + ngc 0055 & @xcite , @xcite , @xcite + ngc 0099 & @xcite , sdss + ngc 0224 ( m 31 ) & @xcite , @xcite , @xcite , @xcite , + & @xcite , @xcite , @xcite + ngc 0234 & @xcite , sdss + ngc 0253 & @xcite + ngc 0300 & @xcite , @xcite , @xcite , @xcite + ngc 0428 & sdss + ngc 0450 & @xcite , sdss + ngc 0493 & sdss + ngc 0575 & @xcite + ngc 0598 ( m 33 ) & @xcite , @xcite , @xcite , @xcite , @xcite , + & @xcite , @xcite , @xcite , @xcite , + & @xcite , @xcite , @xcite + ngc 0628 ( m 74 ) & @xcite , @xcite , @xcite , @xcite , + & @xcite , @xcite + ngc 0753 & @xcite + ngc 0783 & @xcite + ngc 0925 & @xcite + ngc 1055 & sdss + ngc 1058 & @xcite , @xcite + ngc 1068 ( m 77 ) & @xcite , @xcite , @xcite , sdss + ngc 1090 & sdss + ngc 1097 & @xcite , @xcite + ngc 1232 & @xcite , @xcite + ngc 1313 & @xcite , @xcite , @xcite + ngc 1365 & @xcite , @xcite , @xcite , @xcite + ngc 1512 & @xcite + ngc 1598 & @xcite + ngc 1637 & @xcite , @xcite + ngc 1642 & @xcite + ngc 1672 & @xcite + ngc 2336 & @xcite + ngc 2403 & @xcite , @xcite , @xcite , @xcite , @xcite , + & @xcite , @xcite , @xcite , sdss + ngc 2441 & @xcite + ngc 2442 & @xcite + ngc 2541 & @xcite , sdss + ngc 2805 & @xcite , sdss + ngc 2835 & @xcite + ngc 2841 & @xcite , @xcite + ngc 2903 & @xcite , @xcite , @xcite , sdss + ngc 2997 & @xcite , @xcite , @xcite + ngc 3020 & sdss + ngc 3023 & sdss + ngc 3031 ( m 81 ) & @xcite , @xcite , @xcite , @xcite , + & @xcite , sdss + ngc 3184 & @xcite , @xcite , @xcite , sdss + ngc 3198 & @xcite , sdss + ngc 3227 & @xcite , @xcite , @xcite + ngc 3239 & sdss + ngc 3310 & @xcite , @xcite + ngc 3319 & @xcite , sdss + ngc 3344 & @xcite , @xcite , @xcite , sdss + ngc 3351 ( m 95 ) & @xcite , @xcite , @xcite , @xcite , sdss + ngc 3359 & @xcite , sdss + ngc 3486 & sdss + ngc 3521 & @xcite , @xcite + ngc 3621 & @xcite , @xcite + ngc 3631 & sdss + ngc 3718 & @xcite + ngc 3820 & @xcite , sdss + ngc 3893 & @xcite + ngc 3938 & sdss + ngc 4030 & sdss + ngc 4088 & sdss + ngc 4109 & @xcite + ngc 4254 ( m 99 ) & @xcite , @xcite , @xcite , sdss + ngc 4258 ( m 106 ) & @xcite , @xcite , sdss + ngc 4303 ( m 61 ) & @xcite , @xcite , sdss + ngc 4321 ( m 100 ) & @xcite , @xcite , sdss + ngc 4395 & @xcite , @xcite , @xcite , sdss + ngc 4490 & sdss + ngc 4501 & @xcite + ngc 4535 & sdss + ngc 4559 & @xcite , sdss + ngc 4625 & @xcite , @xcite , sdss + ngc 4631 & @xcite , sdss + ngc 4651 & @xcite , sdss + ngc 4654 & @xcite , sdss + ngc 4656 & sdss + ngc 4713 & @xcite , sdss + ngc 4725 & @xcite + ngc 4736 ( m 94 ) & @xcite , @xcite , @xcite + ngc 4861 & @xcite , @xcite , @xcite , @xcite , + & @xcite , @xcite , sdss + ngc 5033 & @xcite , sdss + ngc 5055 ( m 63 ) & @xcite + ngc 5068 & @xcite + ngc 5194 ( m 51 ) & @xcite , @xcite , @xcite , @xcite , sdss , + & @xcite + ngc 5236 ( m 83 ) & @xcite , @xcite , @xcite , @xcite , + & @xcite , @xcite + ngc 5248 & @xcite , sdss + ngc 5457 ( m 101 ) & @xcite , @xcite , @xcite , @xcite , @xcite , + & @xcite , @xcite , @xcite , @xcite , + & @xcite , sdss , @xcite , @xcite , @xcite , + & @xcite , @xcite , @xcite + ngc 5474 & @xcite , sdss + ngc 5668 & @xcite , sdss + ngc 6384 & @xcite , @xcite + ngc 6691 & @xcite + ngc 6744 & @xcite + ngc 6946 & @xcite , @xcite , @xcite + ngc 7331 & @xcite , @xcite + ngc 7495 & @xcite + ngc 7518 & @xcite + ngc 7529 & @xcite + ngc 7570 & @xcite + ngc 7591 & @xcite + ngc 7678 & @xcite + ngc 7793 & @xcite , @xcite , @xcite , @xcite + ic 0010 & @xcite , @xcite , @xcite + ic 0193 & @xcite + ic 0208 & @xcite + ic 0342 & @xcite + ic 1132 & @xcite + ic 2204 & @xcite , sdss + ic 5201 & @xcite + ic 5309 & @xcite + ugc 00223 & @xcite , sdss + ugc 01087 & @xcite + ugc 01862 & @xcite + ugc 02023 & @xcite + ugc 02216 & sdss + ugc 02345 & sdss + ugc 03701 & @xcite + ugc 04107 & @xcite , sdss + ugc 04305 & @xcite + ugc 05100 & @xcite + ugc 06410 & @xcite , sdss + ugc 08091 ( gr 8) & @xcite , @xcite , sdss + ugc 09562 & @xcite , sdss + ugc 09837 & @xcite , sdss + ugc 10445 & @xcite , sdss + ugc 12709 & sdss + pgc 029167 & @xcite + pgc 041318 & @xcite + pgc 044772 & @xcite + pgc 045195 & sdss + pgc 046182 & sdss , @xcite + Abstract:

Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.

Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered . Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video . Paper: this year marks the @xmath0 anniversary of two seminal papers by slonczewski @xcite and berger @xcite on the spin transfer torque ( stt ) phenomenon . this refers to the transfer of angular momentum from a spin - polarized charge current , or a pure spin current , to a local magnetization . while berger had already reported on stt - driven domain wall motion using 45 a of current in millimeter - wide films in 1985 @xcite , based on his predictions from the late 1970s @xcite , and slonczewski had developed the theory for spin - current - driven exchange coupling in magnetic tunnel junctions in 1989 @xcite , the two papers in 1996 predicted that a current flowing perpendicularly to the plane of a magnetic metal multilayer should be able to reorient the magnetization direction in one of the layers . these papers were published at a time when magnetic thin film technology had just become capable of beginning to implement these concepts in earnest , with giant magnetoresistance ( gmr ) @xcite multilayers being prepared for hard drive read - head production and the first high - quality magnetic tunnel junctions having been reported the year before @xcite . it nevertheless took a few more years before the first experimental demonstration of stt - driven magnetization precession was reported @xcite , followed by reports of stt - driven magnetic switching @xcite . in 1999 , hirsch revisited @xcite a different phenomenon , the so - called spin hall effect ( she ) , first described by dyakonov and perel in 1971 @xcite . the she can produce a pure spin current in a direction perpendicular to a charge current @xcite , which can in turn exert substantial stt on an adjacent magnetic layer . it is thus possible to use the she in a nonmagnetic metal to achieve , in principle , all the stt - related functions such as magnetic switching @xcite and driven magnetization precession @xcite that previously required a separate magnetic layer to spin - polarize the charge current . from a technological standpoint , the two most important consequences of stt are _ i _ ) the possibility of programming a magnetic memory , such as magnetoresistive random - access memory ( mram ) @xcite , using a small direct current through the bit , rather than larger currents through adjacent programming lines , and _ ii _ ) the possibility of creating nanoscopic and ultratunable microwave signal generators without the need for any semiconductor materials . our paper deals with the latter technology and reviews the fundamentals and state of the art of so - called spin transfer torque and spin hall effect nano - oscillators ( stnos and shnos ) . for more in - depth reviews of stt - based mram and stnos , see @xcite and @xcite . the term _ spintronics _ is often used to refer to electronics in which both the charge and the spin of the carriers in a metal or semiconductor are utilized ( for reviews of spintronics , see @xcite ) . however , this excludes the very active research currently being undertaken in magnetic insulators ; these can not transfer any charge current , but are excellent conductors of spin currents @xcite . a broader , more general and , we would argue , better definition of modern spintronics is any device and technology in which _ spin currents _ @xcite , with or without additional charge or heat currents , are directly employed and utilized for function . as spin is a vector in three - dimensional spin space , and the flow of the spin carriers takes place in three - dimensional real space , the resulting spin current is a @xmath1 tensor ( for illustrative purposes , the spin current may instead be pictured as a flow , in real space , of tiny magnetic moments , also in real space ) . the tensorial nature of the spin current where the direction of the flowing spins is , in the general case , independent of the real - space direction of the spin current provide for very rich physics and a tremendous potential for new device functionality . in the original formulation of stt , the spin current was assumed to be carried by a spin - polarized charge current , and a number of simplifying assumptions ( e.g. , device geometry and uniformity of magnetization ) were made such that the flow direction of the charge and spin currents were identical . most analysis and modelling of stnos still relies on such assumptions , which tend to be highly accurate in most cases . in this case , the spin - polarized current ( and hence the spin current ) arises directly from the spin polarization of the electrons at the fermi surface of the ferromagnetic metal . when an unpolarized current , say in cu , enters a ferromagnetic layer , it becomes spin - polarized in the so - called spin accumulation zone , which extends both into the cu and the ferromagnet in proportion to the spin diffusion lengths in each material @xcite . as a result , the current acquires spin polarization well inside the cu , reaches about half its full spin polarization at the nm / fm interface , and then , over a few nanometers in the fm , rapidly reaches the spin polarization of the bulk of the ferromagnet . the same processes govern how the spin polarization of the current decays as the current leaves the ferromagnet and again enters a nonmagnetic metal . as the spin diffusion length is short in ferromagnets , but can be several hundred nanometers even at room temperature in most ordinary metals , thin magnetic films are highly effective spin filters and the resulting spin - polarized currents can act over quite long distances . while spin filtering is a straightforward technique for generating spin - polarized currents , spin currents do not necessarily require any charge current to flow . in the case of the she , the charge and spin currents flow in perpendicular directions with respect to each other that is , the charge current is unpolarized and the spin current is free of net charge . while we do not discuss this further here , pure spin currents can also be created through magnetodynamic means , as in so - called spin batteries @xcite . the she can be viewed as a limiting case of the anomalous hall effect ( ahe ) @xcite , which was proposed by edwin hall in 1881 when he applied his earlier discovery of the ordinary hall effect ( he ) @xcite to ferromagnetic metals . as is well known , the he in nonmagnetic metals or semiconductors refers to the build - up of a so - called hall voltage across an electrical conductor , transverse both to the electric current in the conductor and to an external magnetic field perpendicular to the current . it is widely used for material characterization and for sensing magnetic fields . in ferromagnets , however , hall found that this effect could be ten times greater than in nonmagnetic metals . whereas the he arises from the magnetic field s lorentz force on the charge carriers , the ahe is a consequence of asymmetric spin - dependent scattering of the charge carriers , such that a much larger hall voltage can build up . the she is then a limiting case of this phenomenon in materials without any spontaneous magnetization but with substantial spin - orbit coupling . as there is no spin imbalance in a nonmagnetic material , the asymmetric spin - dependent scattering does not result in any hall voltage . what it does result in , however , is a net spin current transverse to the charge current and , in a steady state , the build - up of spin accumulation zones at the edges of the conductor , which can be directly observed by optical means @xcite and which is used in spin - current - driven devices . equipped with two different techniques for generating spin currents , we now briefly explain how spin currents can generate stt and control the magnetic states and the magnetodynamics of nanomagnets and magnetic thin films ( for an in - depth review of stt , see @xcite ) . since each electron carries angular momentum , a spin current can be thought of as a flow of angular momentum . when a spin - polarized current enters ( or reflects at ) a nonmagnetic ferromagnetic interface , the spin precession becomes incoherent over a very short distance . this results in a loss in its average spin angular momentum in the direction _ transverse to the local magnetization_. since the total angular momentum has to be conserved in a closed system , whenever the flow of angular momentum changes , a torque acts on the local magnetization . this torque is often referred to as the `` in - plane '' torque , where the plane is defined by the local magnetization and incoming spins . this torque may act gradually , as when spin - polarized electrons flow through a domain wall and have to rotate so as to follow the local magnetization , or very abruptly , as when a spin current enters a ferromagnet with its magnetization in a direction different to that of the spins in the spin current ; this is almost always the case in stnos and shnos . such an in - plane torque manifests itself as an energy - nonconserving force , similar to damping . furthermore , depending on the sign of the current , this in - plane torque is either parallel or antiparallel to the damping torque . when antiparallel to the damping torque , and for sufficient current magnitude , the current acts to destabilize the local magnetization , thus exciting large angle dynamics . there is also the possibility of an additional stt term that is oriented perpendicular to the plane defined by the local magnetization . this `` out - of - plane '' torque is often referred to as an `` effective field '' contribution , as it has the same symmetry as is typically used in field - driven dynamics . while the perpendicular contribution is small for all - metallic multilayers @xcite , it can be substantial in devices with tunneling barriers @xcite . it was not until sufficient advances in nanofabrication techniques had been achieved that magnetic devices with nanoscopic dimensions could be readily fabricated and the currents needed to induce magnetodynamics be decreased to the ma range . one of the first techniques relied on mechanical point - contacts , where a highly sharpened metallic tip is used to make electrical contact , typically with an area on the order of 10@xmath2 nm@xmath2 , to an extended multilayer film @xcite . soon after , lithographically defined contacts were employed in devices that are now termed nanocontacts , to distinguish them from their mechanical point - contact predecessors @xcite . the fabrication of nanocontacts involves opening a small electrical contact of either circular or elliptical @xcite cross - section through an insulating layer using either electron - beam lithography ( ebl ) or hole - colloid lithography ( hcl ) @xcite techniques . in both point - contact and nanocontact devices , it is only the current injection site that is confined to a nanoscopic region . however , in oscillators based on the nanopillar @xcite geometry , all of the magnetic layers are patterned into a wire with either circular or elliptical cross - section . fabrication is most often accomplished by a combination of ebl and ion milling . however , stencil @xcite and electrodeposition @xcite techniques have also been pursued . the nanopillar geometry ensures that all of the electric current passes through the entire multilayer stack , typically resulting in lower current densities ( < 10@xmath3 a / cm@xmath2 ) being needed to excite stt - induced magnetization switching or oscillations than in the case of nanocontact - based devices ( 10@xmath510@xmath6 a / cm@xmath2 ) . it should be noted that nanopillar fabrication is typically more involved and prone to deleterious edge effects that can increase oscillator linewidths and magnify sample - to - sample variations . due to the smaller magnetic volumes involved , nanopillar - based devices are also more sensitive to thermally induced fluctuations , which results in larger linewidths than in nanocontact devices @xcite . another important consideration is that , as all of the magnetic layers are patterned , significant stray fields are present in nanopillars and need to be considered in analyzing them . additionally , hybrid device architectures have also been pursued in which a nanopillar is fabricated on top of an extended film @xcite . such hybrid structures are useful if , for example , optical access to the extended magnetic layer is desired . generally speaking , the transport of spin current , and therefore of the associated stt , does not need to accompany a charge current . such nonlocal devices are engineered to promote different paths for the spin and charge currents . this geometry is particularly useful in tunnel - junction based devices where large voltages can cause electrical breakdown of the tunnel barrier . such devices typically require at least three terminals for both spin current generation and electrical detection . both stt - induced nonlocal switching @xcite and oscillations @xcite of the magnetization have been demonstrated . devices where the stt is provided by the she that is , where the charge and pure spin currents naturally flow in orthogonal directions , are prime examples of nonlocal oscillators @xcite . by and large , most material stacks utilized in stno devices are based on a ferromagnet / spacer / ferromagnet ( fm / s / fm ) trilayer . one fm is considered free and is most susceptible to the influence of stt . it is therefore advantageous for the free layer to be relatively thin and to have a low intrinsic gilbert damping . ni@xmath7fe@xmath8 , which goes by the trade name `` permalloy '' and is often referred to simply as nife , is the canonical choice for the free layer in the majority of stnos and shnos . in contrast , the other fm layer is fixed , either through pinning to an adjacent magnetic layer or by virtue of its intrinsically larger anisotropy or thickness . the primary role of the fixed layer is to spin - polarize the initially unpolarized electron current . the spacer layer may be metallic ( most typically cu ) , forming what is referred to as a pseudo spin valve ( psv ) , or insulating , as in the case of magnetic tunnel junctions ( mtjs ) . as the tunneling magnetoresistance ( tmr ) effect is much larger than the giant magnetoresistance ( gmr ) effect in all - metallic psvs , mtjs are becoming standard in most nanopillar devices @xcite . the use of mtjs in conventional nanocontacts is challenging , as the topmost fm layer would act to shunt the current . nevertheless , there has been some success in creating hybrid nanocontact mtjs , often termed `` sombrero '' structures , which aim to marry the low linewidths inherent in nanocontact devices with the large output powers found in mtjs @xcite . the materials that constitute the fm layers are diverse and can be broadly classified and distinguished by their equilibrium magnetization configurations , as described next . the vast majority of stno devices studied in the early stages were based on free and fixed fm layers with an intrinsic easy - plane anisotropy meaning that the magnetization prefers to lie in the plane of the film if no external magnetic field is applied @xcite . easy - plane materials , such as co and co@xmath9fe@xmath10 for the fixed layer and nife for the free layer , have most often been pursued . one drawback of utilizing materials with easy - plane anisotropy is that large ( 1 t ) fields are often required to overcome the demagnetization fields needed to pull the magnetization out - of - plane . owing to their improved thermal stability , scalability , and potential for low to zero field operation , materials with perpendicular magnetic anisotropy ( pma ) are extremely attractive . one of the first _ all perpendicular _ nanopillar stt devices combined a [ co / pt]@xmath11 multilayer as a fixed layer with a [ co / ni]@xmath11 multilayer free layer @xcite and was primarily devoted to stt - induced switching . later stnos with perpendicular free and fixed layers have shown zero - field operation @xcite . in these types of devices , the equilibrium magnetization direction of the fixed and free layers are orthogonal to each other . one of the first devices employed a perpendicular fixed layer based on a co / pt multilayer and a planar nife free layer @xcite . more recent devices have tended to deal with the opposite situation , with in - plane fixed layers using either co , co@xmath9fe@xmath10 , or even nife , and a perpendicular co / ni multilayer free layer @xcite . a tilted magnetization will have both in - plane and out - of - plane components ; its use in stnos is predicted to provide additional degrees of freedom to manipulate both static and dynamic states . relative to conventional in - plane or pma magnetic films , the use of tilted fixed layers can optimize microwave signal generation and enhance spin - torque efficiency while maintaining high output powers with low to zero field operation @xcite . to date , experimental work has primarily focused on the fabrication of tilted anisotropy exchange - coupled films by taking advantage of the competition between the pma of a co / pd or co / ni multilayer and the in - plane shape anisotropy of a nife of cofeb layer . @xcite . subsequent measurements have then focused on the fundamental spin wave excitations in such tilted anisotropy exchange springs @xcite . zero field operation in cofeb / mgo / cofeb mtjs with tilted cofeb free layers has been experimentally demonstrated @xcite . departing from the trilayer configurations discussed above , theory @xcite predicts that spin filtering by a single fm layer can generate a sizable spin accumulation at each interface . however , it is only when these interfaces are asymmetric that an imbalance of spin accumulation will lead to a significant stt . experiments on nanopillars with a single co layer showed that sufficient stt could be generated to produce spin - wave excitations @xcite and even switch the co magnetization @xcite . the latest work on single layer devices has been in the nanocontact geometry , where evidence of a periodic vortex / antivortex creation / annihilation mode has been found @xcite . stnos exhibit a diversity of fundamental spin wave modes that depend greatly on , for example , the device architecture , constituent fm materials , applied magnetic field strength , and applied magnetic field angle . here we summarize some of the most prevalent stt - induced excitations in both nanopillar and nanocontact stnos . the particular spin - wave mode generated in a nanopillar geometry depends most sensitively on the diameter or thickness of the free fm layer , as well as on the strength of the external magnetic field . frequently , the dimensions of the free layer are such that a magnetic vortex characterized by an in - plane curling of the magnetization with a 10-nm sized out - of - plane vortex core at the center is a stable equilibrium configuration @xcite . if so , then the stt will excite the fundamental gyration of the vortex core with frequencies typically less than 2 ghz @xcite . however , in a large enough external field , the vortex state will no longer be energetically favorable @xcite , the magnetization will become more or less uniform , and stt will typically excite highly elliptical clam - shell precession in the case of a free layer magnetized in - plane . similarly , if either the diameter or thickness of the free layer is sufficiently small that exchange interactions dictate a uniform magnetization , then such uniform precessions will also be generated . for nanocontact stnos where the equilibrium magnetizations of both the free and fixed layers prefer to lie in - plane , the type of spin wave excitation depends strongly on the external applied magnetic field angle . as described by both analytical @xcite and micromagnetic simulations @xcite , the initial experiments @xcite using in - plane applied magnetic fields excited a strongly nonlinear , self - localized solitonic bullet mode . however , when the free layer is magnetized perpendicularly to the film plane , as described by slonczewski @xcite , an exchange dominated propagating spin wave with a wave vector inversely proportional to the nanocontact radius is excited , as directly proven using brillouin light - scattering experiments @xcite . for intermediate oblique angles , the behavior becomes much more complex ; both simulations @xcite and experiments @xcite provide evidence of mode hoping @xcite between propagating and localized bullet modes @xcite . the use of elliptical nanocontacts has been useful in trying to disentangle the coupling mechanisms between these modes @xcite . special attention must be given in the nanocontact geometry to the critical role played by the current - induced oersted field . for typical drive currents and nanocontact dimensions , the oersted field is on the order of 0.1 t at the nanocontact edge ; this is a significant fraction of the external applied magnetic field and can not therefore be considered an insignificant perturbation . for example , the oersted field results in a localization of the propagating mode for applied field angles near the film plane , which in turn promotes mode coexistence with the solitonic bullet mode @xcite . furthermore , at large applied field angles , the oersted field induces an asymmetric fmr field landscape which results in asymmetric spin wave propagation @xcite . in short , in regions where the addition of the external field and the oersted field produce a local field maximum , spin waves can no longer propagate , resulting in beam - like spin - wave propagation towards ( and beyond ) the local field minimum on the other side of the nanocontact @xcite . finally , the oersted field also plays an important role in the formation of vortex oscillations in nanocontacts @xcite . in small external magnetic fields , the circulating oersted field favors a vortex state in the free layer via the zeeman interaction . this interaction in turn generates a confining potential for the vortex core . the action of stt is then to drive the vortex core away from the center of the nanocontact , whereas the natural damping tends to pull the core back in . in equilibrium , these two forces result in a self - sustained vortex gyration around the nanocontact . in stark contrast to nanopillars , where the vortex motion is physically constrained , these vortex orbits can even occur in regions outside of the nanocontact itself . in such cases , this results in a very large time - varying magnetoresistance signal and thus large output powers . as with vortices in nanopillars , the oscillation frequencies are usually less than 2 ghz and the emission spectrum usually contains several higher harmonics due to elliptical orbits . when driven past a critical velocity , the vortex core can flip polarity , leading to chaotic dynamics @xcite . significant changes in the fundamental magnetodynamical modes are found when the free layer exhibits pma , such as occurs in the oft - employed co / ni multilayers . when the applied field is perpendicular to the film plane , three distinct operational modes can be identified . at small applied magnetic fields , a small - angle precessional fmr - like mode is observed with relatively small power @xcite . as the magnitude of the drive current is increased ( decreased ) , there is a gradual increase ( decrease ) in mode power ( frequency ) consistent with an increasing precession angle . however , at larger applied fields , the oscillator behavior changes dramatically . as the applied field is increased , a dramatic drop in oscillator frequency and an increase in oscillator power are observed , consistent with the formation of a magnetic droplet soliton @xcite . the theoretical basis for the droplet soliton was initiated by ivanov and kosevich @xcite , who showed that the landau lifshitz equation can sustain a family of conservative magnon drop solitons in the absence of damping . while initially a theoretical curiosity , it was then shown that the balance between stt and damping underneath the nanocontact can provide the zero damping needed to sustain what are now called dissipative droplet solitons @xcite . finally , at very large external fields , the zeeman energy will dominate and the droplet will collapse @xcite . the influence of the spin current generated from she - induced spin accumulation on the ferromagnetic resonance of an adjacent magnetic layer has been initially shown on micrometer - sized permalloy discs @xcite . while the linewidth could be reduced by a factor of two , full compensation of the damping , and thus auto - oscillations , were not achieved in these micrometer - sized films , as the uniform application of the torque does not favor any auto - oscillation mode . shnos have thus been realized by nanopatterning of various parts of the bilayer to achieve the nonuniform stt , and can be categorized into four primary device geometries . in the three - terminal nanopillar geometry , the magnetic free layer is a nanosized element on top of an extended slab of the she - generating normal metal @xcite . the electrical read - out is carried out here through an mtj element including the oscillating free layer , which is how appreciable output powers can be achieved . another approach is to utilize a nanogap between two highly conductive electrodes , injecting the necessary high current densities into a nanosized region of an extended fm / pt bilayer @xcite . in the more recent nanoconstriction - based shnos , both the fm and the pt layer are patterned into a nanoscopic constriction @xcite . similar confinement of the she - induced spin current has been demonstrated in a 190 @xmath12 nanowire geometry @xcite . the benefits of the latter two shno device geometries over their stno counterparts include easier fabrication ( for example , they require the deposition of only two layers and fewer lithographic steps ) and direct optical access to the oscillating region . in contrast to stnos , which rely on the gmr or tmr effects , these shnos must however rely on the smaller anisotropic magnetoresistance ( amr ) effect in a single fm layer , and therefore typically exhibit lower output powers . the generation of a sufficient she - induced pure spin - current requires a material with a large spin - orbit coupling . to date , only results on shnos using pt and ta have been published . however , a few different fm materials have been studied in addition to nife , including co@xmath13fe@xmath13b@xmath14 @xcite , co / ni multilayers with pma @xcite , and the ferrimagnetic insulator yttrium iron garnet ( yig ) @xcite . for in - plane magnetized thin films , two different auto - oscillation modes have been observed in nanogap shnos . as described in @xcite , these devices have been studied for in - plane applied fields with microfocused brillouin light scattering and from _ ( i ) _ the sub - fmr frequency and _ ( ii ) _ the spatial size , which was smaller than the instrument resolution , the existence of a self - localized spin wave bullet was inferred @xcite . electrical measurements as a function of the temperature , however , showed the existence of the low - frequency and low - linewidth bullet mode only for cryogenic temperatures with a second high - frequency mode appearing at higher temperatures , and even being dominant at room temperature @xcite . micromagnetic simulations suggest that this high - frequency mode is generated within local field minima caused by the bullet mode which implies the simultaneous excitation of both @xcite . however , since the oersted field generated from the nonuniform current in the pt layer always counteracts the applied in - plane field , a similar field minimum in the nanogap is always present , allowing the high - frequency mode to form . using a 1 @xmath15 m large gap between the electrodes , and thus generating rather uniform current distributions , @xcite showed that the high - frequency mode most likely resembles a coherent excitation of the fmr mode . in the nanowire shnos , the existence of both bulk and edge modes has been identified @xcite while the linear high - frequency excitation shows an increasing threshold current with the strength of the applied field , the spin wave bullet has a relatively constant threshold current as long as the internal magnetization angle stays below a critical value @xcite . the output characteristics can be thus tuned between these two regimes via the application of a tilted magnetic field , where the electrically measured linewidth is lowest for high fields , since only the spin - wave bullet exists there @xcite . moreover , the interplay can be varied by the nanogap size , favoring the bullet mode for smaller sizes . when both modes are energized at the same time for intermediate field strengths , their linewidths are broadened due to mode coupling events @xcite . propagating spin waves with frequencies above fmr are important in , for example , mutual synchronization , and are predicted by micromagnetic simulation in nanogap shnos for out - of - plane fields @xcite . however , in this study , the current densities required are about twice as large as for the in - plane field modes , which inhibits the experimental observation of the propagating spin wave modes . nanoconstriction - based shnos show a mode that evolves from the thermal fmr , as shown by micro - focused bls measurements and electrical detection @xcite , and is therefore comparable to the high - frequency mode of nanogap shnos . however , with the constricted geometry around the oscillation center , the presence of the bullet is hindered and the single - mode excitation can be detected with lower linewidths . synchronization to external sources , as described later in regards to injection locking , or mutual phase locking of individual stos , as described here , are techniques often used to improve oscillator power and linewidth . there are several coupling mechanisms that have been investigated to synchronize stnos to each other , each with a varying degree of experimental success . synchronization of serially connected nanopillar stnos using their shared microwave electric current @xcite has been theoretically proposed , but to date has shown no clear success . another route to synchronize nanopillars is to utilize the relatively long - range dipolar stray microwave fields generated during precession . recent simulations show this to be a feasible solution for vortex - based oscillators @xcite . to date , however , the most successful experimental works on synchronizing stnos have occurred in the nanocontact geometry . in such devices , the nanocontacts are patterned on top of a shared free layer , which in turn provides the coupling medium . the first works to show that two stnos could be synchronized were published in 2005 @xcite it was soon shown experimentally @xcite , as well as investigated theoretically @xcite and micromagnetically @xcite , that the coupling mechanism is mediated by propagating spin waves . since these early experiments , progress has remained relatively slow . only in 2009 was it demonstrated that four vortex - based stnos could synchronize , this time by direct exchange interactions mediated by an antivortex . @xcite . then , in 2013 , the successful synchronization of three high - frequency stnos was shown for the first time @xcite . recent simulations have shown robust synchronization of an arbitrary number of nanocontact vortex oscillators mediated by the strong magnetodipolar interaction @xcite . the most recent work on synchronization has focused on the use of highly directional spin - wave beams . while it has been shown that the oersted field generated in the vicinity of the nc can dramatically alter the emission pattern of sws @xcite , its role in the synchronization behavior of multiple ncs has been largely ignored . synchronization is promoted ( impeded ) by the oersted field landscape when the nanocontacts are oriented vertically ( horizontally ) with respect to the in - plane component of the external field , due to the highly anisotropic spin - wave propagation . not only is robust synchronization between two oscillators observed for separations greater than 1000 nm , but synchronization of up to five oscillators has been observed in the vertical array geometry . furthermore , the synchronization must be considered driven , rather than mutual , in nature as the final frequency is enforced by the stno from which the sw beam originates @xcite . the precession frequency of the stnos is tunable over a large range , both through the direct current and the applied magnetic field . the precession frequency generally increases as the external magnetic field increases . its behavior is generally governed by the kittel equation , according to which the precession frequency increases as the square root of the applied field at low fields and linearly at high fields . theoretical works predict a very high frequency of 0.2 thz for the common ferromagnetic material ni@xmath16fe@xmath14 . @xcite in the very first work by kiselev _ et al . _ , @xcite a highest frequency of 25 ghz was demonstrated . the devices used were nanopillars of co / cu / co/ multilayer . a year later , rippard _ et al . _ @xcite demonstrated a frequency of 38 ghz in a nanocontact device based on a ni@xmath16fe@xmath14 free layer . the field tunability of frequency is 18.5 mhz / mt and the current tunability is about -200 to 400 mhz / ma for nanocontact stnos . @xcite bonetti _ et al . _ , @xcite reported a frequency as high as 46 ghz for high magnetic fields applied normally to the film plane . the stno frequency was limited by instrumentation . it was reported that it would be possible to achieve a frequency beyond 65 ghz , which would be potentially attractive for a range of millimeter - wave applications , such as short - range high - speed radio links ( ieee 802.15.3c ) near 60 ghz and vehicle radar for active cruise control at 77 ghz . @xcite an stno may be viewed as a time - dependent resistor with its resistance given by : @xmath17 where @xmath18 is the average resistance of the stno , @xmath19 is the magnetoresistance of the material stack , and @xmath20 is the precession frequency . for a gmr - based device , @xmath19 is low , and hence the power generated by the gmr - based stnos is also low , typically in the sub - nw range . @xcite higher powers have been achieved in magnetic tunnel junction based material stacks , for which @xmath19 is significantly larger . in magnetic tunnel junctions , powers of up to 3.6 @xmath15w have already been reported for spin - torque vortex oscillators with an feb free layer @xcite . however , the frequency of operation of these vortex oscillators is typically low . for uniform mode oscillation , the highest power achieved so far has been 2 @xmath15w , obtained from a sombrero - shaped nanocontact magnetic tunnel junction based stno with a perpendicular anisotropy free layer @xcite . for in - plane magnetized mtj - stnos , the highest power reported was 140 nw @xcite for a frequency around 5 ghz . while the frequency can be increased using the magnetic field , the output power usually drops with increasing field strength ; obtaining higher power at higher frequencies is thus a challenge . a novel method of achieving this involves frequency doubling in mtj - stnos @xcite . in that work , powers of up to 1.25 nw were demonstrated at a frequency of @xmath2110 ghz . modulation is a very important requirement for the communication applications of stnos . modulation studies of stnos are , however , surprisingly limited despite the issue s critical importance for communications applications . the first experimental demonstration of frequency modulation in an stno was reported in 2005 @xcite , with the demonstration that the addition of an alternating current to the direct current results in frequency - modulated spectral output , generating sidebands spaced at the modulation frequency . this phenomena is demonstrated in fig.[fig - mod1 ] ( b ) , where equally spaced multiple sidebands are produced upon the addition of an rf current ( 1 ma , 100 mhz ) . the device is shown in fig.[fig - mod1 ] ( a ) and corresponds to that of @xcite . as can be seen in this figure , the sidebands have unequal amplitudes and the carrier frequency shifts with the addition of the rf current . this phenomena was first reported in @xcite and was attributed to nonlinear frequency modulation . however , in 2010 , it was shown that the unequal sideband amplitudes result from a combination of nonlinear frequency and amplitude modulation ( nfam ) . it was shown that the combined nonlinear frequency and amplitude modulation model can accurately describe the experimental data without any adjustable parameters . the frequency of modulation was 40 mhz in @xcite and 100 mhz in @xcite . later , it was shown that a nanocontact - based stno can be successfully modulated to a modulation frequency of 3.2 ghz @xcite . the agreement of experiment with the nfam model is maintained until 1 ghz @xcite . it was also shown that modulation can be used to narrow the linewidth of stnos by as much as 85 % @xcite . this linewidth reduction is due to a general averaging effect of modulation on the nonlinearity of the stno signal and was explained on the basis of nonlinear auto - oscillator theory @xcite and nonlinear frequency modulation . in 2011 , modulation of a pair of nanocontact stnos was successfully demonstrated@xcite . in fig.[fig - mod2 ] , we reproduce the results from @xcite which show that the synchronized state of a pair of nanocontact stnos ( at 57 ma ) can be maintained while modulating . furthermore , the modulation behavior can be explained by assuming a single oscillator model , as shown in fig.[fig - mod2](b ) . this finding was very promising for applications involving a large array of synchronized stnos . many electronic circuits use injection - locked phase - locked loops ( plls ) as one of the building blocks of rf transceivers and so it is also crucial for applications to demonstrate the modulation of the injection - locked state of the stno . more recently , modulation of injection - locked mtj - stnos was demonstrated and the modulation - mediated nonresonant unlocking mechanism was described @xcite . interestingly , the unlocking phenomena sets a lower limit on the modulation frequency but no upper limit on the modulation frequency for injection - locked mtj - stnos . experimental studies of the modulation of vortex - based stnos are rather limited . the first digital modulation of vortex - based stnos was demonstrated in @xcite . using frequency shift keying ( fsk ) , it was shown that the oscillator can switch between two stabilized frequencies differing by @xmath22 in 20 ns . this performance is difficult to achieve in a voltage - controlled oscillator , and vortex - based stnos hence hold much promise for fsk modulation - based applications . more recently , analog frequency modulation has been demonstrated in a magnetic tunnel junction nanopillar in in - plane fields @xcite . in this work , the authors show modulation for modulation frequencies that are up to 10% of the oscillator frequency . in these experiments , however , the modulation period is comparable to the characteristic time of the vortex dynamics , and hence the frequency modulation data was modelled using `` deviation sensitivity , '' which differs significantly from the tunability measured in a quasistatic regime . when the modulation frequency of an stno is increased , the stno may not be perfectly modulated . a recent study has shown that the upper limit of the frequency of modulation in an mtj - stno is 200 mhz @xcite . in this work , the authors showed that the bandwidth of modulation is limited by the amplitude relaxation rate @xmath23 and that the power level of amplitude modulation strongly decreases beyond @xmath24 , where @xmath25 . this finding is in agreement with the nonlinear auto - oscillator theory of stnos @xcite . although the original nonlinear auto - oscillator theory does not include amplitude modulation , a recent theoretical study that includes an nfam scheme also suggests that the modulation bandwidth of stnos is determined by @xmath23@xcite . the miniature size of stnos and shnos compared to industry - standard oscillators inevitably makes their oscillation more susceptible to noise . the stability of any oscillator can be characterized in terms of its amplitude noise and phase noise , where the width of the spectral peak ( commonly referred to as the linewidth ) is usually governed by the phase noise as has also been found for stnos . the phase noise of shnos has not been as extensively studied as that of stnos , but one initial report @xcite provides a lowest linewidth on par with what has been achieved for stnos . a prerequisite for stable oscillation is that the oscillation is not intermittent . one type of intermittency is on off toggling , which has been observed for low drive currents @xcite . another type is mode - hopping between different distinct frequencies . stnos do in many cases show spectra with the presence of several modes represented by distinct frequencies , where time - domain measurements can often reveal a random mode - hopping between these frequencies . the mode - hopping rate can range from milliseconds down to nanoseconds , meaning that , depending on the bandwidth of the characterization setup , it might not always be observed . it should be noted that in some cases there is the possibility of actual coexistence ( in time ) , a clear indicator of which is the appearance of second - order intermodulation products @xcite . if the application is low bandwidth compared to the mode - hopping rate , the mode - hopping itself need not constitute too large a problem , since the fast fluctuations might be washed out . however , the mode - hopping has a large negative effect on the coherence of the oscillation . in a mode - hopping event from one frequency to another and then back again , the phase will be lost ( introducing phase noise ) . this becomes visible in the spectrum in the form of a dramatic linewidth increase @xcite . the occurrence of multiple simultaneously excitable modes is most evident in nanopillar stnos @xcite , where the modes emerge as various edge and center modes on account of its confined geometry . in nanocontact stnos , with their far - extending magnetic films , mode - hopping within the propagating mode has been experimentally observed only at very high drive currents ( close to the breakdown of the oscillation ) , @xcite while simultaneous excitability of the propagating and localized bullet mode can also induce mode - hopping @xcite . moreover , the propagating mode in nanocontact stnos generally exhibits discontinuous mode transitions as a function of the bias point @xcite . close to these transitions , the linewidths of the individual modes typically increase @xcite , which could be theoretically explained by rapid hopping between the modes @xcite , though this has not been experimentally confirmed yet . apart from control over the existence of multiple oscillation modes ( and the instability they introduce to each other ) , a second fundamental question is that of the stability of a single mode . this stability is primarily considered to be governed by thermal magnetic noise which is usually modelled as random fluctuations in the magnetic field . this has a straightforward implementation in the macrospin approximation . micromagnetically , it is usually implemented as fluctuations that are uncorrelated in both time and space @xcite . it has been noted @xcite , that no rigorous theory has been presented to explain the effects of spatial fluctuations on the spin - wave eigenmodes . another aspect of stability arises from the complexity of micromagnetic systems , where spatial inhomogeneity can be induced by locally varying fields even at zero temperature @xcite . such spatially varying fields may stem from the geometry through the fabricated shape of the free layer or the roughness in the nanometer - scale film thickness , or through local anisotropy fields in the metal grains . the noise properties have been found to be highly dependent on the strong amplitude frequency coupling @xcite which acts to transfer amplitude noise into frequency noise @xcite . as the magnetization is precessing around its steady - state orbit , fluctuations act to displace it along two orthogonal directions : in parallel with and perpendicularly to the orbit . parallel displacement introduces a single phase shift whereas a perpendicular perturbation ( fig . [ fig - phasenoise](a ) ) provides no initial phase difference . however , since a perpendicular perturbation places the magnetization away from the steady - state orbit at an oscillation amplitude different from the steady - state amplitude , the magnetization will momentarily take on another frequency associated with this new amplitude . during the time of precessional relaxation of the amplitude back to the steady - state orbit , the frequency will gradually approach the steady - state frequency , but before this frequency has been reached , the oscillator will have accumulated a phase shift as compared to the nominal frequency ( fig . [ fig - phasenoise](b ) ) . quantitatively , both theoretical calculations @xcite and experiments @xcite show that the main effect of perpendicular perturbations and of amplitude - frequency coupling is by far the dominating mechanism for the phase noise in stnos . in the framework of the general nonlinear auto - oscillator theory , it has also been demonstrated how , in the vicinity of the oscillation threshold , the linewidth increases due to spectral line asymmetry induced by several statistical solutions to the noise process @xcite . the high impact of the strong amplitude frequency coupling on the resulting phase noise means that the oscillator will be least sensitive to fluctuations when its amplitude frequency coupling is nonexistent , but can also be improved by achieving a higher amplitude relaxation rate @xcite . from a fundamental thermal noise perspective , the frequency stability should be increased by the use of materials with low thermal damping of the magnetization precession i.e . materials that exhibit a low value for the gilbert damping parameter . on the contrary , however , the amplitude relaxation rate is proportional to the gilbert damping , meaning that the amplitude perturbations will be damped out more slowly . since the amplitude fluctuations are the major source of frequency noise , a high value for the gilbert damping parameter is preferable . @xcite . several experimental studies report the presence of low - frequency @xmath26 frequency noise in both mtj nanopillar @xcite and gmr nanocontact stnos @xcite . from a characterization point of view , the high level of @xmath26 frequency noise is challenging in the sense that the standard phase noise measurement modes of spectrum analyzers are unable to lock onto the stno electric rf signal . the research community has been able to overcome the characterization problem through time - domain measurement of the waveform and subsequent digital signal processing @xcite , but from an application point of view , @xmath26 noise remains an issue . this @xmath26 frequency noise has been reported to increase in the presence of multiple oscillation modes @xcite , but is nonetheless of considerable strength in the apparently single - mode case . there is currently no theory of stnos that can account for the presence of low - frequency @xmath26 frequency noise in single - mode oscillations , but it has been suggested that this might be related to the existence of unexcited oscillation modes or @xmath26-type amplitude noise possibly introduced by microscopic material inhomogeneity @xcite . two major paths are currently discernible for stabilizing the generation of stno and shno frequencies by applying electrical signals to the device . the first is injection - locking , in which the stno @xcite or shno @xcite is locked to an injected rf signal at the same nominal frequency or at an integer or integer fraction multiple thereof . the locking can be achieved through direct electrical injection of the external rf signal ( superposed on the dc drive current ) or through an ac magnetic field from an adjacent microstrip line . one compelling system is that in which the stno / stho itself acts as the injection source , thereby acting to stabilize itself . such a system has been investigated @xcite analytically and , for the case of a vortex mtj stno , also numerically . with the correct choice of delay time for the reinjected signal , the linewidth for this vortex mtj stno case could be decreased by a factor of 4 . self - injection locking has recently been achieved also experimentally , showing a maximum decrease in linewidth by a factor of 2.5 @xcite . a second path is to use a phase - locked loop ( pll ) for the stno / shno . in a pll , the oscillator s rf signal is compared with a reference signal and the resulting phase difference is used to instantly rebias the oscillator , taking advantage of its frequency - tuning mechanism . pll - locking through an external reference signal has been experimentally achieved for stno vortex oscillations below 150 mhz @xcite and , very recently , for a mtj stno at 5 ghz @xcite . the limited number of reported studies is probably related to the lack of pll circuits with bandwidths high enough to track the stno signal . a unique feature of stnos and shnos is their ability to provide multiple functionalities , from microwave source to microwave detection and signal processing . this versatility opens up the possibility of employing stnos and shnos in a wide variety of applications . the most common applications include microwave sources , microwave detectors , noncoherent transceiver , magnonics , neuromorphic computing , magnetic field sensing , and magnetic field generation . these applications will be introduced in this section . moreover , the issues , challenges , and developments in stno- and shno - based applications will be discussed . the miniature size , very wide tunability , high integration level with cmos technology , and low power consumption of stnos make them good candidates for current - controlled oscillators in multiband multistandard radio systems @xcite . table i summarizes the performance of different stnos in the literature . as can be seen from table i , a single mtj stno @xcite can be used as a local oscillator ( lo ) covering the entire bandwidth of ultrawideband ( uwb ) applications . gmr stnos typically have higher and broader tunable frequency ranges . the operating frequency of gmr stnos has been experimentally observed up to 46 ghz and extrapolated to 65 ghz @xcite . it has been theoretically estimated that the operating frequency of stnos may approach 200 ghz if stno nanocontacts can be made much smaller @xcite . more recently , a very low gilbert damping and ultrafast spin precession with frequencies of up to 280 ghz has been demonstrated @xcite , which makes it possible to further extend the operating frequencies of stnos . the extremely high and broad operating frequency range of stnos also opens up the possibility of utilizing them in millimeter wave application for instance , in wideband data transmission systems . [ cols="<,<,<,<,<,<,<,<",options="header " , ] the phase noise of the mtj stno was measured by nanosc ab at about -65 dbc / hz at 1 mhz offset . the issues of spectrum impurity and the limited output power must be overcome before stnos enter widespread use as microwave sources . recently , significant progress has been achieved in understanding the fundamentals and in overcoming these two limitations of stnos @xcite . as can be seen in table i , a sombrero - shaped nanocontact geometry for mtjs has been developed @xcite that remedies the incompatibility of conventional nanocontact geometry with mtjs . this geometry enables the optimization of either the q factor ( narrower linewidth ) @xcite or the output power @xcite . specifically , a very narrow linewidth of 3.4 mhz @xcite and an output power of -26.2 dbm @xcite were obtained . these newly developed mtj stnos show significant improvement in either linewidth or output power in comparison with the conventional mtj stnos @xcite . in addition , recent research has shown that by using a tilted cofeb fl @xcite , the bias field can be removed , which opens up more possibilities for mtj stno - based applications . for gmr stnos , which typically have a narrower linewidth than mtj stnos , the output power has been enhanced by using cofemnsi ( cfms ) layers as magnetic layers @xcite . by further combining the cfms with nanocontact geometry , a large output power of -46 dbm and a narrow linewidth of 3 mhz can be achieved simultaneously at zero applied field @xcite . in addition , the phase noise of stnos has been reduced by using mutual synchronization and current modulation as an extrinsic tool @xcite . the limited output power has been improved by employing amplifiers dedicated to stnos @xcite . the achieved improvements of phase noise and output power bring stnos closer to being used as microwave sources . in addition to these issues , the device - to - device performance variation of stnos is significant . furthermore , the mode structure and temperature dependence of stnos need to be well understood so as to suppress the unwanted modes and to estimate the performance variation that results from changes in temperature . other issues that need to be taken into consideration in applications include the irreversible changes of stnos and thus reliability issues at high biasing current @xcite . the stt provides many useful phenomena as detailed in @xcite . one important phenomenon is the spin - torque diode effect discovered in mtj - based devices @xcite . the spin - torque diode effect can be described as follows : when a microwave signal with a frequency close to the natural fmr frequency of one of the mtj s electrodes is incident on the device , the induced oscillating tunnel current can excite magnetic precession via spin transfer . the resistance oscillation that results from this precession is combined with the oscillating current so as to produce a measurable dc voltage component across the tunnel junction @xcite . recently , an mtj microwave detector that does not require any external bias fields , and that possesses a sensitivity of about 75400 mv / mw has been demonstrated at room temperature @xcite . in addition , this microwave detector can provide very high sensitivity even at a low input microwave powers of 10 nw ( -50 dbm ) . its sensitivity is about one order of magnitude higher than that of a semiconductor diode , such as a schottky diode . the large sensitivity of mtj stnos makes them promising candidates as frequency - tunable resonant microwave detectors for a wide range of applications in telecommunications , radars , and smart networks @xcite . taking advantage of the fast switching speed of stnos , an stno - based wireless communication system with binary amplitude shift keying ( ask ) has been demonstrated in @xcite . in this system , the stno performs the ask modulation at the transmitter and a simple envelope detector recovers the data at the receiver . for this noncoherent communication system , the considerable phase noise of stnos is not an issue . an stno with 1 ns turn - on time ( or switching speed ) allows a communication system that can achieve a data rate as high as 1.48 gbps @xcite . considering also the spin - torque diode effect , stnos can be utilized as both modulators and demodulators in transceiver systems , as shown in fig . [ sto_based_transceiver ] . as modulators , stnos translate different currents representing the binary data `` 0 '' and `` 1 '' directly into signals at different frequencies . as demodulators , stnos enable the direct conversion of the received signals to high and low output voltages representing `` 0 '' and `` 1 '' . these stno - based transceivers may enable the development of low - complexity , low - cost , high data - rate , and noncoherent communication systems . stnos with a point contact ( fig . 2(a ) ) on an extended free layer allow spin - torque - driven emission as well as propagation of spin waves outward from the nanocontact @xcite . the spin wave emitted from an stno with a nanoscale electrical contact has been directly observed and can propagate for several micrometers @xcite . the emission of propagating spin waves is the basis of synchronizing arrays of stnos for microwave applications . moreover , stnos are very attractive as wave emitters for future use in magnonic devices . magnonics is an emerging and rapidly growing research field that connects magnetism , spintronics , and electronics @xcite . it investigates and utilizes magnetic phenomena connected with spin waves , in a broad sense . magnonics employs different devices to deal with spin waves . the key devices are spin - wave emitters , spin - wave manipulators ( modulators ) , and spin - wave detectors . stnos , as previously discussed , can play all the roles of these key devices . as a consequence , stnos have the potential to realize all the fundamental functions that are necessary for magnonics @xcite . neurons can be modelled as nonlinear oscillators that vary their rhythms based on incoming signals @xcite . to form a network of neurons coupled by synapses , the nonlinear oscillators need to be able to synchronize with each other in frequency or phase . the neural network can therefore be realized using the non - boolean nature of these nonlinear oscillators @xcite . stnos are able to act as nonlinear oscillators because they can synchronize when coupled via a mutual electrical or magnetic interaction . furthermore , it has been demonstrated that other spintronic devices including spin - torque memristors and spin - torque memories are very suitable in playing the roles of synapses and memory processes in mimicking neural networks @xcite . consequently , stnos , together with other spintronic devices , pave the way to full spintronic implementations of neural networks , including both polychronous wave computation and information storage @xcite . non - boolean computing based on stnos shows great potential in data - processing applications , particularly in neural networks . stno - based non - boolean computing is discussed in @xcite and its physical processes are reviewed in @xcite . particularly , the concept of a dual - pillar stno that decouples bias and read paths for non - boolean energy - efficient computing has been proposed , and a simulation framework has been presented in @xcite . the dual - pillar stno is composed of a gmr stno and an mtj stno . the gmr stno is employed for the bias path so as to achieve a low - resistance interface and hence to allow low bias - voltage , as well as high energy efficiency . the high - resistance mtj stno is used to sense a small current and then to produce an output signal with large amplitude . the magnetoresistive effect , which is necessary in the operation of stnos , is also widely used to translate detected magnetic field strength to resistance . specifically , gmr - based sensors have been commercialized for sensing magnetic fields which range in strength from the earth s field up to a couple of hundred oersted @xcite . in addition to this range , larger magnetic fields can also be measured by stnos , by virtue of measuring the change in their oscillation frequency caused by the difference between the bias field and the magnetic field being tested . this stno - based magnetic field sensor can provide high sensitivity up to 180 ghz / t @xcite . moreover , the output of the stno is the frequency or frequency change , rather than the signal amplitude , thus relaxing the requirement for the system to have a large signal - to - noise ratio . for this reason , stnos are very attractive for sensing large magnetic fields . the concept of employing stnos to generate localized ac magnetic fields for microwave - assisted magnetic recording ( mamr ) applications has been proposed in @xcite , theoretically analyzed in @xcite , and extensively studied in @xcite . toshiba recently demonstrated a new technology that uses the localized ac magnetic field to reverse the magnetization direction , allowing the excitement of a magnetization oscillation in only one specific magnetic layer of a multilayer magnetic recording system @xcite . this technology could enable the development of 3-d magnetic recording systems , where independent data are written and read from overlapping layers of a multilayer recording medium . the applications to which stnos are suited are not limited to the above suggestions . for instance , stnos have been found very useful as high - density massively parallel microwave signal processors and small phased array transmitters @xcite . it has also been demonstrated in @xcite that stnos can be employed to develop novel readers with high data transfer rates for hard disk drives ( hdds ) . other applications that would make full use of the nanoscale aspects and of the high - speed broad tunability of stnos need further exploration . with the recent emergence of the spin hall effect , a new type of spintronic oscillator , the shno , has been developed @xcite . this provides a new route for the development of microwave and magnonic devices @xcite . shnos exhibit several advantages over stnos , including easier nanofabrication , lower required dc current , direct optical access to the magnetodynamically active area , smaller radiation losses , and suppressed nonlinear damping process @xcite . however , the linewidth of shnos is on the same order as that of stnos , and their output power is currently lower than that of stnos . despite the issues with shnos , their advantages offer an opportunity to implement novel nanoscale microwave sources and emitters for wireless communications and magnonics applications @xcite . in addition to the need to improve stno and shno performance , stno electrical models , stno and shno integration into integrated circuits ( ic ) , and dedicated circuitry are also necessary for the development of applications based on stnos and shnos . electrical models of stnos and shnos are critical , since they can efficiently reduce the time , cost , and risk of errors involved in building prototypes of the entire system of the stno or shno with the ic . integration of the stno or shno with the ic is important , since it should enable better performance , miniaturization , and even single - chip solutions . dedicated circuitry is essential for stno / shno - based applications , since it can perform necessary functions such as biasing and amplification , and can extrinsically improve the performance of stnos or shnos . the issues , challenges , and development of the electrical models , integration , and dedicated circuitry are discussed in the following . the basic procedure for modeling stnos or shnos involves solving the landau - lifshitz - gilbert equation with a slonczewski spin - transfer term ( llgs ) . one possible approach to solving the llgs is based on micromagnetics @xcite . such a model presents the magnetization dynamics of stnos and shnos on a microscopic scale . it typically considers the anisotropy energy , the zeeman energy of the external field , the ferromagnetic exchange energy and the magnetostatic energy @xcite . however , the micromagnetic simulation typically takes days , which is not efficient for the development of stno / shno - based applications . additionally , the output dataset of this model can not be directly used in a circuit simulator . the complicated numeric computation involved in the micromagnetics - based model prevents it from being implemented in a hardware description language . a hardware description language is a specialized computer language used to describe both structural and behavioral aspects of designs including , but not limited to , electronic components , circuits , and systems @xcite . it allows the automatic analysis , simulation , and evaluation of designs , through the use of electronic design automation ( eda ) tools . the micromagnetics - based model is therefore not suited to evaluating stnos and shnos under different bias conditions together with other circuits , as would be required in stno / shno - based applications . an alternative approach to solving the llgs is based on the macrospin approximation , which assumes that only a spatially uniform magnetization precession is excited and that the spin - polarized current is uniform across the area of the free layer @xcite . a macrospin - based model is able to provide an analytical solution with acceptable accuracy , while allowing implementation in a hardware description language . as a result , a macrospin - based analytical model is needed to design and develop stno - based systems . several macrospin - based models of stnos @xcite have been developed and implemented in verilog - a , a commonly used hardware description language for analog systems . however , the models in @xcite require the aid of matlab to compute the effective magnetic field , which is then manually imported into the verilog - a model . consequently , they can not be considered fully implemented in verilog - a . moreover , these models @xcite use equations that are not fully validated . additionally , only one specific device has been used to verify the models , which is not sufficient . a comprehensive mtj stno model that can overcome the issues in @xcite , has been presented in @xcite . this further allows accurate replication of the phase noise and hence of the generated signal . moreover , this model can be used for various mtj stnos to estimate their performance together with the ics . nonetheless , this model is not suitable for simulations that involve momentary variations in the operating conditions , such as current or field modulation . to enable comprehensive analysis and evaluation of stnos or shnos together with ics , future models need to be divergence - free , while allowing all the necessary simulations and analyses . future models also need to include temperature dependence . to avoid the losses due to external components and connections , as well as to eliminate wave reflections , stnos and shnos need to be integrated with other technologies , such as silicon - cmos and gallium - arsenide ( gaas ) , which allow the circuits required for stnos and shnos to be implemented . additionally , integration is vital if the nanoscale of stnos and shnos is to be capitalized upon and to achieve compact stno / shno - based systems . the integration approach must be considered before implementing the circuits and developing the system , since it has a significant impact on the system topology and circuit design . the advantages and disadvantages of different possible integration approaches are discussed in @xcite . the wire - bonding approach has been successfully used in @xcite , mainly thanks to its independent preintegration characterization and optimization of the ic and stno . in @xcite , an mtj stno has been integrated with a dedicated cmos ic amplifier and an off - chip bias - tee using wire bonding . however , the use of the off - chip bias - tee limits both the integration level and the bandwidth of the system . the cmos ic proposed in @xcite includes an on - chip bias - tee and has been successfully integrated with an stno by bonding wires . the bonding wire has also been used as part of the bias - tee design , since it introduces extra high - frequency impedance into the ac decoupling path of the bias - tee . furthermore , the parasitics of the bonding wires in the signal path , as well as the on - chip bias - tee , determine the requirements of the input and output filters for achieving a flat frequency response over a large bandwidth . the wire - bonding approach is appropriate for the current level of maturity of stno technology , as it allows easy implementation , measurement , and replacement . monolithic and flip - chip - based approaches can ultimately result in a higher level of integration and better performance at high frequencies . the monolithic integration approach has been successfully used in hybrid cmos / mtj logic circuits ( fig . [ sto_ic_integration](a ) ) targeting the st - mram technology @xcite , which utilizes the same stt effect as that in stnos and shnos . for instance , a fully functional 64 mb st - mram built on a standard 90 nm process has been developed in @xcite . nevertheless , monolithic integration has not yet been implemented so as to handle the rf signals generated by stnos or shnos . in order to use monolithic integration , the top - layer surface roughness of the ic stacks needs to be very well controlled , as this layer acts as the cu buffer layer for fabricating stnos and shnos . the roughness of this layer has significant impact on the spatial variation in the multilayer structure , and hence on the dynamics of stnos and shnos @xcite . an rms roughness lower than @xmath27 is necessary to avoid unpredictable device performance and significant performance degradation @xcite . flip - chip - based integration is one of the principal methods of interconnecting ics @xcite . as the cost of flip - chip - based integration decreases @xcite , its application space broadens further . [ sto_ic_integration](b ) shows a possible integration between an stno / shno and a cmos ic using the flip - chip - based approach . compared to monolithic integration , flip - chip - based integration allows easier implementation and measurement and retains a low - loss interconnection @xcite . however , neither monolithic nor flip - chip - based integration will be suitable until the device - to - device performance has improved to the extent that no major adjustments ( such as to the topology ) of the circuitry are required for different devices . the stno / shno - based applications described above could be possibly achieved by integrating stnos or shnos into the existing system architectures and by employing the existing circuits implemented in other technologies @xcite . for instance , a system architecture similar to the simple noncoherent transceiver in @xcite has been used to develop an stno - based wireless communication system @xcite . an amplifier using the existing topology of a cascode differential pair with a resistive load has been implemented in @xcite to provide amplification for the stno . additionally , considering the device - to - device performance variation of stnos and shnos , dedicated circuitry may need to allow adjustable performance so as to avoid multiple designs for different stnos or shnos . for instance , the variable gain amplifier ( vga ) @xcite and the tunable lna @xcite , whose gain and bandwidth , respectively , can be tuned to some extent , may be suitable for providing adjustable gain and bandwidth for different stnos or shnos . however , several dedicated circuits need to be designed for stnos and shnos . the first important circuit is the bias - tee , which is necessary for applying the required dc bias current into stnos and shnos without disturbing the rf signals generated . current mirrors have been considered in @xcite for biasing stnos . however , the resistance ( biasing voltage ) of the stno changes as the angle of the magnetic field is varied , so the current mirror can not accurately copy the current from a current source to the stno under all circumstances . accordingly , an on - chip bias - tee that can provide accurate current for stnos and shnos is necessary . factors that also need to be taken into account during the design of the bias - tee include the maximum applied dc current , the applied integration approach , the resistance of stnos and shnos , the power supply voltage of ic technology , the clamp circuit for providing esd protection , and the parasitics . a dedicated sample bias - tee design is given in @xcite . this design considers the above factors and takes care of the trade - offs involved in selecting the number of turns , the separation distance between each turn , and the width of metalization needed for the inductor to act as the ac decoupling component . to implement the dedicated on - chip bias - tee , electromagnetic simulations may be required when custom inductors are necessary @xcite . the second important circuit for stnos and shnos is the amplifier , which needs to provide sufficient gain and bandwidth for a given application while featuring low noise and proper input impedance . for example , to use stnos or shnos as los , the amplifier should typically enhance the output power of the stnos and shnos to 0 dbm so as to drive an rf mixer to perform frequency conversion . to take full advantage of stnos or shnos in multiband multistandard radios , the bandwidth of the amplifier needs to cover multiple bands of interest . additionally , the amplifier must introduce as little noise as possible to the entire system . the input impedance of the amplifier needs to match the impedance of stnos or shnos for maximizing the transferred power . nevertheless , for stnos or shnos with a small resistance ( a few ohms ) , wideband impedance matching to such a resistance is not feasible . this is because any parasitic will introduce an impedance mismatch much larger than a few ohms . in this case , rather than maximizing the transferred power , an amplifier with large input impedance is preferable , since it can maximize the ac voltage delivered to the amplifier as well as the signal - to - noise ratio at the output @xcite . other important circuits include those that handle the phase noise of stnos and shnos , such as phase - locked loops ( plls ) and injection - lock ring oscillators ( ilros ) for frequency synthesis . this is due to the fact that the frequency fluctuation of stnos occurs every several nanoseconds or even few tens of nanoseconds @xcite . the fast frequency change requires a rapid lock time ( or settling time ) of at most a few nanoseconds , which is difficult to achieve in either plls or ilros . recently , the phase of an mtj stno , which generates a 5.12 ghz microwave signal , has been successfully locked by a pll to that of an 80 mhz reference clock , resulting in a significant increase in q from 800 to 5@xmath28 @xcite . this is the first demonstration of phase synchronization of stno output to a lower frequency external signal , and it may be a milestone toward practical applications of stnos . state - of - the - art stnos and shnos feature very wide tunability , high levels of integration with cmos , high operating frequencies , fast switching speeds , and miniature size . their unique blend of features suggests a wide range of applications , including microwave sources , microwave detectors , noncoherent transceivers , magnonics , neuromorphic computing , magnetic field sensing , and magnetic field generation . over the past decade , extensive research has taken place to understand and further exploit the nonlinear physical phenomena of stnos and shnos . in this paper , we have introduced the fundamentals , geometries , and functional properties of stnos and shnos . we have additionally reviewed the state of the art in stno and shno technologies . furthermore , we have presented the potential for these oscillators in their popular applications . however , challenges still remain on both the device and system level . these need to be overcome before the use of stnos and shnos can become widespread . this work is partially supported by the swedish research council ( vr ) , the swedish foundation for strategic research ( ssf ) , the knut and alice wallenberg foundation ( kaw ) , the european commission fp7-ict-2011-contract no . 317950 `` mosaic '' , and the european research council ( erc ) under the european community s seventh framework programme ( fp/2007 - 2013)/erc grant 307144 `` mustang '' . m. n. baibich , j. m. broto , a. fert , f. n. van dau , f. petroff , p. etienne , g. creuzet , a. friederich , and j. chazelas , `` giant magnetoresistance of ( 001)fe/(001)cr magnetic superlattices , '' _ phys . _ , vol . 61 , no . 21 , p. 2472 , 1988 . j. a. katine , f. j. albert , r. a. buhrman , e. b. myers , and d. c. ralph , `` current - driven magnetization reversal and spin - wave excitations in co @xmath29cu @xmath29co pillars , '' _ phys . _ , vol . 84 , pp . 31493152 , apr 2000 . j. wunderlich , b. kaestner , j. sinova , and t. jungwirth , `` experimental observation of the spin - hall effect in a two - dimensional spin - orbit coupled semiconductor system , '' _ phys . rev . _ , vol . 94 , no . 4 , pp . 14 , 2005 . i. m. miron , k. garello , g. gaudin , p .- j . zermatten , m. v. costache , s. auffret , s. bandiera , b. rodmacq , a. schuhl , and p. gambardella , `` perpendicular switching of a single ferromagnetic layer induced by in - plane current injection , '' _ nature _ , vol . 7359 , pp . 189193 , jul . 2011 . l. liu , c .- f . pai , d. c. ralph , and r. a. buhrman , `` magnetic oscillations driven by the spin hall effect in 3-terminal magnetic tunnel junction devices , '' _ phys 109 , no . 18 , p. 186602 , oct . 2012 . v. e. demidov , s. urazhdin , h. ulrichs , v. tiberkevich , a. slavin , d. baither , g. schmitz , and s. o. demokritov , `` magnetic nano - oscillator driven by pure spin current , '' _ nature mater . _ , vol . 11 , no . 12 , pp 10281031 , dec . 2012 . b. n. engel , j. kerman , b. butcher , r. w. dave , m. deherrera , m. durlam , g. grynkewich , j. janesky , s. v. pietambaram , n. d. rizzo , j. m. slaughter , k. smith , j. j. sun , and s. tehrani , `` a 4-mb toggle mram based on a novel bit and switching method , '' _ ieee trans . _ , vol . 41 , no . 1 , 132136 , jan . 2005 . r. l. stamps , s. breitkreutz , j. kerman , a. v. chumak , y. otani , g. e. w. bauer , j .- u . thiele , m. bowen , s. a. majetich , m. klui , i. l. prejbeanu , b. dieny , n. m. dempsey , and b. hillebrands , `` the 2014 magnetism roadmap , '' _ j. phys . _ , vol . 47 , no . 33 , p. 333001 , 2014 . m. zwierzycki , y. tserkovnyak , p. j. kelly , a. brataas , and g. e. w. bauer , `` first - principles study of magnetization relaxation enhancement and spin transfer in thin magnetic films , '' _ phys . b _ , vol . 71 , p. 064420 , feb 2005 . r. matsumoto , a. chanthbouala , j. grollier , v. cros , a. fert , k. nishimura , y. nagamine , h. maehara , k. tsunekawa , a. fukushima , and s. yuasa , `` spin - torque diode measurements of mgo - based magnetic tunnel junctions with asymmetric electrodes , '' _ appl . , vol . 4 , no . 6 , p. 063001 , 2011 . m. tsoi , a. g. jansen , j. bass , w. c. chiang , v. tsoi , and p. wyder , `` generation and detection of phase - coherent current - driven magnons in magnetic multilayers , '' _ nature _ , vol . 6791 , pp . 4648 , jul . 2000 . w. h. rippard , m. r. pufall , and t. j. silva , `` quantitative studies of spin - momentum - transfer - induced excitations in co / cu multilayer films using point - contact spectroscopy , '' _ appl . phys _ , vol . 82 , no . 8 , p. 1260 , 2003 . m. r. pufall , w. h. rippard , and t. j. silva , `` materials dependence of the spin - momentum transfer efficiency and critical current in ferromagnetic metal / cu multilayers , '' _ appl . _ , vol . 83 , no . 2 , pp . 323325 , 2003 . w. h. rippard , m. r. pufall , s. kaka , s. e. russek , and t. j. silva , `` direct - current induced dynamics in co@xmath9fe@xmath10/ni@xmath16fe@xmath14 point contacts , '' _ phys . _ , vol . 92 , p. 027201 , jan 2004 . r. k. dumas , s. r. sani , s. m. mohseni , e. iacocca , y. pogoryelov , p. k. muduli , s. chung , p. drrenfeld , and j. kerman , `` recent advances in nanocontact spin - torque oscillators , '' _ ieee trans . _ , vol . 50 , no . 6 , p. 4100107 , jun . 2014 . s. sani , j. persson , s. mohseni , y. pogoryelov , p. muduli , a. eklund , g. malm , m. kll , a. dmitriev , and j. kerman , `` mutually synchronized bottom - up multi - nanocontact spin - torque oscillators , '' _ nat . _ , vol . 4 , p. 2731 , nov . 2013 . s. i. kiselev , j. c. sankey , i. n. krivorotov , n. c. emley , r. j. schoelkopf , r. a. buhrman , and d. c. ralph , `` microwave oscillations of a nanomagnet driven by a spin - polarized current , '' _ nature _ , vol . 425 , no . 6956 , pp . 380383 , sep . 2003 . wegrowe , a. fabian , p. guittienne , x. hoffer , d. kelly , j ansermet , and e. olive , `` exchange torque and spin transfer between spin polarized current and ferromagnetic layers , '' _ appl . _ , vol . 80 , no . 37753777 , 2002 . f. abreu araujo , m. darques , k. a. zvezdin , a. v. khvalkovskiy , n. locatelli , k. bouzehouane , v. cros , and l. piraux , `` microwave signal emission in spin - torque vortex oscillators in metallic nanowires : experimental measurements and micromagnetic numerical study , '' _ phys . b _ , vol . 86 , p. 064424 , aug 2012 . f. abreu araujo , l. piraux , v. a. antohe , v. cros , and l. gence , `` single spin - torque vortex oscillator using combined bottom - up approach and e - beam lithography , '' _ appl . 102 , no . 22 , p. 222402 , 2013 . w. h. rippard , m. r. pufall , and s. e. russek , `` comparison of frequency , linewidth , and output power in measurements of spin - transfer nanocontact oscillators , '' _ phys . b _ , vol . 74 , p. 224409 , dec 2006 . j. z. sun , m. c. gaidis , e. j. osullivan , e. a. joseph , g. hu , d. w. abraham , j. j. nowak , p. l. trouilloud , y. lu , s. l. brown , d. c. worledge , and w. j. gallagher , `` a three - terminal spin - torque - driven magnetic switch , '' _ appl . _ , vol . 95 , no . 8 , p. 083506 , 2009 . l. xue , c. wang , y .- t . cui , l. liu , a. swander , j. z. sun , r. a. buhrman , and d. c. ralph , `` resonance measurement of nonlocal spin torque in a three - terminal magnetic device , '' _ phys . 108 , p. 147201 , apr 2012 . v. e. demidov , s. urazhdin , a. zholud , a. v. sadovnikov , a. n. slavin , and s. o. demokritov , `` spin - current nano - oscillator based on nonlocal spin injection , '' _ sci . rep . _ , vol . 5 , no . 8578 , pp . 15 , 2015 . v. e. demidov , s. urazhdin , h. ulrichs , v. tiberkevich , a. slavin , d. baither , g. schmitz , and s. o. demokritov , `` magnetic nano - oscillator driven by pure spin current , '' _ nature mater . _ , vol . 11 , pp . 10281031 , 2012 . z. duan , a. smith , l. yang , b. youngblood , j. lindner , v. e. demidov , s. o. demokritov , and i. n. krivorotov , `` nanowire spin torque oscillator driven by spin orbit torques , '' _ nat . commun . _ , vol . 5 , p. 5616 a. m. deac , a. fukushima , h. kubota , h. maehara , y. suzuki , s. yuasa , y. nagamine , k. tsunekawa , d. d. djayaprawira , and n. watanabe , `` bias - driven high - power microwave emission from mgo - based tunnel magnetoresistance devices , '' _ nature phys . _ , vol . 4 , no . 10 , 803809 , oct . h. maehara , h. kubota , y. suzuku , t. seki , k. nishimura , y. nagamine , k. tsunekawa , a. fukushima , a. m. deac , and s. yuasa , `` large emission power over 2 @xmath15w with high q factor obtained from nanocontact magnetic - tunnel - junction - based spin torque oscillator , '' _ appl . , vol . 6 , no . 11 , p. 113005 , 2013 . h. maehara , h. kubota , y. suzuki , t. seki , k. nishimura , y. nagamine , k. tsunekawa , a. fukushima , h. arai , t. taniguchi , h. imamura , k. ando , and s. yuasa , `` high q factor over 3000 due to out - of - plane precession in nano - contact spin - torque oscillator based on magnetic tunnel junctions , '' _ appl . 7 , no . 2 , p. 023003 , 2014 . s. mangin , d. ravelosona , j. a. katine , m. j. carey , b. d. terris , and e. e. fullerton , `` current - induced magnetization reversal in nanopillars with perpendicular anisotropy , '' _ nature mater . _ , vol . 5 , no . 3 , pp . 210215 , 2006 . d. houssameddine , u. ebels , b. delaet , b. rodmacq , i. firastrau , f. ponthenier , m. brunet , c. thirion , j .- p . michel , l. prejbeanu - buda , m .- c . cyrille , o. redon , and b. dieny , `` spin - torque oscillator using a perpendicular polarizer and a planar free layer , '' _ nature mater . _ , vol . 6 , no . 6 , pp . 447453 , jun 2007 . w. h. rippard , a. m. deac , m. r. pufall , j. m. shaw , m. w. keller , s. e. russek , g. e. w. bauer , and c. serpico , `` spin - transfer dynamics in spin valves with out - of - plane magnetized coni free layers , '' _ phys . rev . b _ , vol . 81 , p. 014426 , jan 2010 . s. m. mohseni , s. r. sani , j. persson , t. n. anh nguyen , s. chung , y. pogoryelov , and j. kerman , `` high frequency operation of a spin - torque oscillator at low field , '' _ phys . status solidi rapid res . _ , vol . 5 , no . 12 , pp . 432434 , 2011 . s. m. mohseni , s. r. sani , j. persson , t. n. a. nguyen , s. chung , y. pogoryelov , p. k. muduli , e. iacocca , a. eklund , r. k. dumas , s. bonetti , a. deac , m. a. hoefer , and j. kerman , `` spin torque - generated magnetic droplet solitons , '' _ science _ 6125 , pp . 12951298 , mar . s. m. mohseni , s. r. sani , r. k. dumas , j. persson , t. n. anh nguyen , s. chung , y. pogoryelov , p. k. muduli , e. iacocca , a. eklund , and j. kerman , `` magnetic droplet solitons in orthogonal nano - contact spin torque oscillators , '' _ physica b : condensed matter _ , 435 , pp . 84 87 , 2014 . s. chung , s. m. mohseni , s. r. sani , e. iacocca , r. k. dumas , t. n. anh nguyen , y. pogoryelov , p. k. muduli , a. eklund , m. hoefer , and j. kerman , `` spin transfer torque generated magnetic droplet solitons ( invited ) , '' _ j. appl 115 , no . 17 , p. 172612 , may 2014 . y. zhou , s. bonetti , c. l. zha , and j. kerman , `` zero - field precession and hysteretic threshold currents in a spin torque nano device with tilted polarizer , '' _ new j. phys . _ , vol . 11 , no . 10 , p. 103028 , 2009 . t. n. a. nguyen , y. fang , v. fallahi , n. benatmane , s. m. mohseni , r. k. dumas , and j. kerman , `` [ co / pd]-nife exchange springs with tunable magnetization tilt angle , '' _ appl . _ , vol . 98 , no . 17 , p. 172502 , 2011 . t. a. nguyen , n. benatmane , v. fallahi , y. fang , s. mohseni , r. dumas , and j. kerman , `` [ co / pd]4-co - pd - nife spring magnets with highly tunable and uniform magnetization tilt angles , '' _ j. magn . 324 , no . 3929 3932 , 2012 . s. chung , s. m. mohseni , v. fallahi , t. n. anh nguyen , n. benatmane , r. k. dumas , and j. kerman , `` tunable spin configuration in [ co / ni]-nife spring magnets , '' _ j. phys . _ , vol . 46 , no . 12 , p. 125004 , 2013 . s. tacchi , t. n. a. nguyen , g. carlotti , g. gubbiotti , m. madami , r. k. dumas , j. w. lau , j. kerman , a. rettori , and m. g. pini , `` spin wave excitations in exchange - coupled [ co / pd]-nife films with tunable tilting of the magnetization , '' _ phys . b _ , vol . 87 , p. 144426 , apr 2013 . s. tacchi , t. n. a. nguyen , g. gubbiotti , m. madami , g. carlotti , m. g. pini , a. rettori , v. fallahi , r. k. dumas , and j. kerman , `` [ co / pd]-cofeb exchange spring magnets with tunable gap of spin wave excitations , '' _ j. phys . _ , vol . 47 , no . 49 , p. 495004 , 2014 . w. skowroski , t. stobiecki , j. wrona , g. reiss , and s. van dijken , `` zero - field spin torque oscillator based on magnetic tunnel junctions with a tilted cofeb free layer , '' _ appl . , vol . 5 , no . 6 , p. 063005 , 2012 . s. sani , p. drrenfeld , s. mohseni , s. chung , and j. kerman , `` microwave signal generation in single - layer nano - contact spin torque oscillators , '' _ ieee trans . _ , vol . 49 , no . 7 , pp . 43314334 , july 2013 . v. s. pribiag , i. n. krivorotov , g. d. fuchs , p. m. braganca , o. ozatay , j. c. sankey , d. c. ralph , and r. a. buhrman , `` magnetic vortex oscillator driven by d.c . spin - polarized current , '' _ nature phys . _ , vol . 3 , no . 7 , pp . 498503 , jul . 2007 . v. sluka , a. kkay , a. m. deac , d. e. brgler , r. hertel , and c. m. schneider , `` spin - transfer torque induced vortex dynamics in fe / ag / fe nanopillars , '' _ j. phys . _ , vol . 44 , no . 38 , p. 384002 , 2011 . n. locatelli , v. v. naletov , j. grollier , g. de loubens , v. cros , c. deranlot , c. ulysse , g. faini , o. klein , and a. fert , `` dynamics of two coupled vortices in a spin valve nanopillar excited by spin transfer torque , '' _ appl . _ , vol . 98 , no . 6 , pp . , a. v. khvalkovskiy , j. grollier , a. dussaux , k. a. zvezdin , and v. cros , `` vortex oscillations induced by spin - polarized current in a magnetic nanopillar : analytical versus micromagnetic calculations , '' _ phys . b _ , vol . 80 , p. 140401 , oct 2009 . p. bortolotti , e. grimaldi , a. dussaux , j. grollier , v. cros , c. serpico , k. yakushiji , a. fukushima , h. kubota , r. matsumoto , and s. yuasa , `` parametric excitation of magnetic vortex gyrations in spin - torque nano - oscillators , '' _ phys . b _ , vol . 88 , p. 174417 , nov 2013 . e. grimaldi , a. dussaux , p. bortolotti , j. grollier , g. pillet , a. fukushima , h. kubota , k. yakushiji , s. yuasa , and v. cros , `` response to noise of a vortex based spin transfer nano - oscillator , '' _ phys . b _ , vol . 89 , p. 104404 , mar 2014 . r. lehndorff , d. e. brgler , s. gliga , r. hertel , p. grnberg , c. m. schneider , and z. celinski , `` magnetization dynamics in spin torque nano - oscillators : vortex state versus uniform state , '' _ phys . b _ , vol . 80 , p. 054412 , aug 2009 . g. consolo , b. azzerboni , g. gerhart , g. a. melkov , v. tiberkevich , and a. n. slavin , `` excitation of self - localized spin - wave bullets by spin - polarized current in in - plane magnetized magnetic nanocontacts : a micromagnetic study , '' _ phys . rev . b _ , vol . 76 , p. 144410 , oct 2007 . s. bonetti , v. tiberkevich , g. consolo , g. finocchio , p. muduli , f. mancoff , a. slavin , and j. kerman , `` experimental evidence of self - localized and propagating spin wave modes in obliquely magnetized current - driven nanocontacts , '' _ phys . 105 , p. 217204 , nov 2010 . m. madami , s. bonetti , g. consolo , s. tacchi , g. carlotti , g. gubbiotti , f. b. mancoff , m. a. yar , and j. kerman , `` direct observation of a propagating spin wave induced by spin - transfer torque , '' _ nature nanotech . _ , vol . 6 , p. 635 , august 2011 . s. bonetti , v. puliafito , g. consolo , v. s. tiberkevich , a. n. slavin , and j. kerman , `` power and linewidth of propagating and localized modes in nanocontact spin - torque oscillators , '' _ phys . b _ , vol . 85 , p. 174427 , may 2012 . n. c. krivorotov , i. n. andemley , j. c. sankey , s. i. kiselev , d. c. ralph , and r. a. buhrman , `` time - domain measurements of nanomagnet dynamics driven by spin - transfer torques , '' _ science _ , vol . 5707 , pp . 228231 , 2005 . r. k. dumas , e. iacocca , s. bonetti , s. r. sani , s. m. mohseni , a. eklund , j. persson , o. heinonen , and j. kerman , `` spin - wave - mode coexistence on the nanoscale : a consequence of the oersted - field - induced asymmetric energy landscape , '' _ phys . rev . lett . 110 , p. 257202 , jun 2013 . m. madami , e. iacocca , s. sani , g. gubbiotti , s. tacchi , r. k. dumas , j. kerman , and g. carlotti , `` propagating spin waves excited by spin - transfer torque : a combined electrical and optical study , '' _ phys . b _ , vol . 92 , p. 024403 , jul 2015 . q. mistral , m. van kampen , g. hrkac , j .- v . kim , t. devolder , p. crozat , c. chappert , l. lagae , and t. schrefl , `` current - driven vortex oscillations in metallic nanocontacts , '' _ phys . 100 , p. 257201 , jun 2008 . a. ruotolo , v. cros , b. georges , a. dussaux , j. grollier , c. deranlot , r. guillemet , k. bouzehouane , s. fusil , and a. fert , `` phase - locking of magnetic vortices mediated by antivortices , '' _ nature nanotech . _ , vol . 4 , no . 8 , 528532 , aug . m. manfrini , j .- v . kim , s. petit - watelot , w. van roy , l. lagae , c. chappert , and t. devolder , `` propagation of magnetic vortices using nanocontacts as tunable attractors , '' _ nature nanotech . _ , vol . 9 , no . 20 , pp . 121125 , feb 2014 , letter . s. petit - watelot , j .- v . kim , a. ruotolo , r. m. otxoa , k. bouzehouane , j. grollier , a. vansteenkiste , b. van de wiele , v. cros , and t. devolder , `` commensurability and chaos in magnetic vortex oscillations , '' _ nature phys . _ , vol . 8 , no . 9 , pp . 682687 , sep . 2012 . v. e. demidov , s. urazhdin , e. r. j. edwards , m. d. stiles , r. d. mcmichael , and s. o. demokritov , `` control of magnetic fluctuations by spin current , '' _ phys . 107 , p. 107204 , sep 2011 . m. ranjbar , p. drrenfeld , m. haidar , e. iacocca , m. balinskiy , t. q. le , m. fazlali , a. houshang , a. a. awad , r. k. dumas , and j. kerman , `` cofeb - based spin hall nano - oscillators , '' _ ieee magn . _ , vol . 5 , p. 3000504 , 2014 . m. collet , x. de milly , o. dallivy kelly , v. v. naletov , r. bernard , p. bortolotti , v. e. demidov , s. o. demokritov , j. l. prieto , m. mu noz , v. cros , a. anane , g. de loubens , and o. klein , `` generation of coherent spin - wave modes in yttrium iron garnet microdiscs by spin - orbit torque , '' _ arxiv:1504.01512 [ cond-mat.mtrl-sci]_ , 2015 . g. gerhart , e. bankowski , g. a. melkov , v. s. tiberkevich , and a. n. slavin , `` angular dependence of the microwave - generation threshold in a nanoscale spin - torque oscillator , '' _ phys . b _ , vol . 76 , no . 2 , p. 024437 2007 . f. abreu araujo , a. d. belanovsky , p. n. skirdkov , k. a. zvezdin , a. k. zvezdin , n. locatelli , r. lebrun , j. grollier , v. cros , g. de loubens , and o. klein , `` optimizing magnetodipolar interactions for synchronizing vortex based spin - torque nano - oscillators , '' _ phys . b _ , vol . 92 , p. 045419 , jul 2015 . s. kaka , m. r. pufall , w. h. rippard , t. j. silva , s. e. russek , and j. a. katine , `` mutual phase - locking of microwave spin torque nano - oscillators , '' _ nature _ , vol . 7057 , pp . 389392 , sep . 2005 . m. r. pufall , w. h. rippard , s. e. russek , s. kaka , and j. a. katine , `` electrical measurement of spin - wave interactions of proximate spin transfer nanooscillators , '' _ phys . _ , vol . 97 , p. 087206 , aug 2006 . t. kendziorczyk , s. o. demokritov , and t. kuhn , `` spin - wave - mediated mutual synchronization of spin - torque nano - oscillators : a micromagnetic study of multistable phase locking , '' _ phys . b _ , vol . 90 , p. 054414 , aug 2014 . a. houshang , p. drrenfeld , e. iacocca , s. r. sani , j. kerman , and r. k. dumas , `` spin wave beam driven synchronisation of multiple nanocontact spin torque oscillators , '' _ nature nanotech . _ , under review . m. hoefer , m. ablowitz , b. ilan , m. pufall , and t. silva , `` theory of magnetodynamics induced by spin torque in perpendicularly magnetized thin films , '' _ phys . _ , vol . 95 , no . 26 , p. 267206 s. bonetti , p. muduli , f. mancoff , and j. kerman , `` spin torque oscillator frequency versus magnetic field angle : the prospect of operation beyond 65 ghz , '' _ appl . _ , vol . 94 , no . 10 , p. 102507 , 2009 . k. muduli , y. pogoryelov , y. zhou , f. mancoff , and j. kerman , `` spin torque oscillators and rf currents - modulation , locking , and ringing , '' _ integr . 125 , no . 1 , pp . 147154 , 2011 . j. hasch , e. topak , r. schnabel , t. zwick , r. weigel , and c. waldschmidt , `` millimeter - wave technology for automotive radar sensors in the 77 ghz frequency band , '' _ ieee trans . theory tech . _ , vol . 60 , no . 3 , pp . 845860 , march 2012 . s. tsunegi , h. kubota , k. yakushiji , m. konoto , s. tamaru , a. fukushima , h. arai , h. imamura , e. grimaldi , r. lebrun , j. grollier , v. cros , and s. yuasa , `` high emission power and q factor in spin torque vortex oscillator consisting of feb free layer , '' _ appl . , vol . 7 , no . 6 , p. 063009 , 2014 . k. muduli , y. pogoryelov , s. bonetti , g. consolo , f. mancoff , and j. kerman , `` nonlinear frequency and amplitude modulation of a nanocontact - based spin - torque oscillator , '' _ phys . b _ , vol . 81 , no . 14 , p. 140408 k. muduli , y. pogoryelov , f. mancoff , and j. kerman , `` modulation of individual and mutually synchronized nanocontact - based spin torque oscillators , '' _ ieee trans . _ , vol . 47 , pp . 15751579 , jun . 2011 . p. drrenfeld , e. iacocca , j. kerman , and p. k. muduli , `` modulation - mediated unlocking of a parametrically phase - locked spin torque oscillator , '' _ appl . 105 , no . 25 , p. 252404 , 2014 . m. manfrini , t. devolder , j .- v . kim , p. crozat , n. zerounian , c. chappert , w. van roy , l. lagae , g. hrkac , and t. schrefl , `` agility of vortex - based nanocontact spin torque oscillators , '' _ appl . _ , vol . 95 , no . 19 , p. 192507 , nov . 2009 . m. quinsat , f. garcia - sanchez , a. s. jenkins , v. s. tiberkevich , a. n. slavin , l. d. buda - prejbeanu , a. zeltser , j. a. katine , b. dieny , m .- c . cyrille , and u. ebels , `` modulation bandwidth of spin torque oscillators under current modulation , '' _ appl . 105 , no . 15 , p. 152401 , 2014 . e. iacocca and j. kerman , `` analytical investigation of modulated spin - torque oscillators in the framework of coupled differential equations with variable coefficients , '' _ phys . b _ , vol . 85 , p. 184420 , may 2012 . d. houssameddine , u. ebels , b. dieny , k. garello , j .- p . michel , b. delaet , b. viala , m .- c . cyrille , j. a. katine , and d. mauri , `` temporal coherence of mgo based magnetic tunnel junction spin torque oscillators , '' _ phys . 102 , no . 25 , p. 257202 , jun . 2009 . s. bonetti , v. puliafito , g. consolo , v. tiberkevich , a. slavin , and j. kerman , `` power and linewidth of propagating and localized modes in nanocontact spin - torque oscillators , '' _ phys . b _ , vol . 85 , no . 17 , pp . 18 , may 2012 . a. eklund , s. sani , s. mohseni , j. persson , b. malm , and j. @xmath30kerman , `` triple mode - jumping in a spin torque oscillator , '' in _ noise and fluctuations ( icnf ) , 2013 22nd international conference on _ , june 2013 , pp . m. r. pufall , w. h. rippard , s. e. russek , and e. r. evarts , `` anisotropic frequency response of spin - torque oscillators with applied field polarity and direction , '' _ phys . b _ , vol . 86 , p. 094404 , sep 2012 . k. muduli , o. g. heinonen , and j. kerman , `` temperature dependence of linewidth in nanocontact based spin torque oscillators : effect of multiple oscillatory modes , '' _ phys . b _ , vol . 86 , p. 174408 , nov 2012 . j. c. sankey , i. n. krivorotov , s. i. kiselev , p. m. braganca , n. c. emley , r. a. buhrman , and d. c. ralph , `` mechanisms limiting the coherence time of spontaneous magnetic oscillations driven by dc spin - polarized currents , '' _ phys . b _ , vol . 72 , p. 224427 , dec 2005 . d. v. berkov , `` magnetization dynamics including thermal fluctuations : basic phenomenology , fast remagnetization processes and transitions over high - energy barriers , '' in _ handbook of magnetism and advanced magnetic materials _ , h. kronmller and s. parkin , eds.1em plus 0.5em minus 0.4emjohn wiley & sons , ltd , 2007 , vol . 3 . l. bianchini , s. cornelissen , j .- v . kim , t. devolder , w. van roy , l. lagae , and c. chappert , `` direct experimental measurement of phase - amplitude coupling in spin torque oscillators , '' _ appl . _ , vol . 97 , no . 3 , p. 032502 , 2010 . kim , v. tiberkevich , and a. n. slavin , `` generation linewidth of an auto - oscillator with a nonlinear frequency shift : spin - torque nano - oscillator , '' _ phys . 100 , p. 017207 , jan 2008 . b. georges , j. grollier , v. cros , a. fert , a. fukushima , h. kubota , k. yakushijin , s. yuasa , and k. ando , `` origin of the spectral linewidth in nonlinear spin - transfer oscillators based on mgo tunnel junctions , '' _ phys . b _ , vol . 80 , p. 060404 , aug 2009 . m. quinsat , d. gusakova , j. f. sierra , j. p. michel , d. houssameddine , b. delaet , m .- c . cyrille , u. ebels , b. dieny , l. d. buda - prejbeanu , j. a. katine , d. mauri , a. zeltser , m. prigent , j .- c . nallatamby , and r. sommet , `` amplitude and phase noise of magnetic tunnel junction oscillators , '' _ appl . _ , vol . 97 , no . 18 , p. 182507 , 2010 . j. f. sierra , m. quinsat , f. garcia - sanchez , u. ebels , i. joumard , a. s. jenkins , b. dieny , m .- c . cyrille , a. zeltser , and j. a. katine , `` influence of thermal fluctuations on the emission linewidth in mgo - based spin transfer oscillators , '' _ appl . _ , vol . 101 , no . 6 , p. 062407 , 2012 . kim , q. mistral , c. chappert , v. s. tiberkevich , and a. n. slavin , `` line shape distortion in a nonlinear auto - oscillator near generation threshold : application to spin - torque nano - oscillators , '' _ phys . 100 , p. 167201 , apr 2008 . o. j. lee , p. m. braganca , v. s. pribiag , d. c. ralph , and r. a. buhrman , `` quasilinear spin - torque nano - oscillator via enhanced negative feedback of power fluctuations , '' _ phys . b _ , vol . 88 , p. 224411 , dec 2013 . r. sharma , p. drrenfeld , e. iacocca , o. g. heinonen , j. kerman , and p. k. muduli , `` mode - hopping mechanism generating colored noise in a magnetic tunnel junction based spin torque oscillator , '' _ appl . 105 , no . 13 , p. 132404 , 2014 . a. eklund , s. bonetti , s. r. sani , s. m. mohseni , j. persson , s. chung , s. a. h. banuazizi , e. iacocca , m. @xmath31stling , j. @xmath30kerman , and b. g. malm , `` dependence of the colored frequency noise in spin torque oscillators on current and magnetic field , '' _ appl . 104 , no . 9 , p. 092405 , 2014 . w. h. rippard , m. r. pufall , s. kaka , t. j. silva , s. e. russek , and j. a. katine , `` injection locking and phase control of spin transfer nano - oscillators , '' _ phys . _ , vol . 95 , p. 067203 , aug 2005 . j. c. sankey , p. m. braganca , a. g. f. garcia , i. n. krivorotov , r. a. buhrman , and d. c. ralph , `` spin - transfer - driven ferromagnetic resonance of individual nanomagnets , '' _ phys . _ , vol . 96 , p. 227601 , jun 2006 . b. georges , j. grollier , m. darques , v. cros , c. deranlot , b. marcilhac , g. faini , and a. fert , `` coupling efficiency for phase locking of a spin transfer nano - oscillator to a microwave current , '' _ phys . _ , vol . 101 , p. 017201 , jul 2008 . a. dussaux , a. v. khvalkovskiy , j. grollier , v. cros , a. fukushima , m. konoto , h. kubota , k. yakushiji , s. yuasa , k. ando , and a. fert , `` phase locking of vortex based spin transfer oscillators to a microwave current , '' _ appl . _ , vol . 98 , no . 13 , p. 132506 , 2011 . r. lebrun , a. jenkins , a. dussaux , n. locatelli , s. tsunegi , e. grimaldi , h. kubota , p. bortolotti , k. yakushiji , j. grollier , a. fukushima , s. yuasa , and v. cros , `` understanding of phase noise squeezing under fractional synchronization of a nonlinear spin transfer vortex oscillator , '' _ phys . 115 , p. 017201 , jun 2015 . v. e. demidov , h. ulrichs , s. v. gurevich , s. o. demokritov , v. s. tiberkevich , a. n. slavin , a. zholud , and s. urazhdin , `` synchronization of spin hall nano - oscillators to external microwave signals , '' _ nat . _ , vol . 5 , p. 3179 , jan . 2014 . g. khalsa , m. d. stiles , and j. grollier , `` critical current and linewidth reduction in spin - torque nano - oscillators by delayed self - injection , '' _ appl . 106 , no . 24 , p. 242402 , 2015 . s. tsunegi , e. grimaldi , r. lebrun , h. kubota , a. s. jenkins , k. yakushiji , a. fukushima , p. bortolotti , j. grollier , s. yuasa , and v. cros , `` self - injection locking of a vortex spin torque oscillator by delayed feedback , '' _ arxiv:1509.05583v1 _ , 2015 . s. tamaru , k. yakushiji , b. wang , a. fukushima , and h. kubota , `` generation of highly stable 5 ghz microwave from a spin torque oscillator by phase locked loop referenced to a 80 mhz clock , '' in _ magnetics conference ( intermag ) , 2015 ieee _ , may 2015 , pp . 11 . p. villard , u. ebels , d. houssameddine , j. katine , d. mauri , b. delaet , p. vincent , m. c. cyrille , b. viala , j. p. michel , j. prouve , and f. badets , `` a ghz spintronic - based rf oscillator , '' _ ieee j. solid - state circuits _ , vol . 45 , no . 1 , pp . 214223 , 2010 . t. chen , p. drrenfeld , s. rodriguez , j. kerman , and a. rusu , `` a highly tunable microwave oscillator based on mtj sto technology , '' _ microw . _ , vol . 56 , no . 9 , pp . 20922095 , 2014 . k. muduli , o. g. heinonen , and j. kerman , `` bias dependence of perpendicular spin torque and of free - and fixed - layer eigenmodes in mgo - based nanopillars , '' _ phys . b _ , vol . 83 , no . 18 , p. 184410 , 2011 . s. mizukami , f. wu , a. sakuma , j. walowski , d. watanabe , t. kubota , x. zhang , h. naganuma , m. oogane , y. ando , and t. miyazaki , `` long - lived ultrafast spin precession in manganese alloys films with a large perpendicular magnetic anisotropy , '' _ phys . 106 , no . 11 , p. 117201 , 2011 . d. houssameddine , s. h. florez , j. a. katine , j. p. michel , u. ebels , o. mauri , d. ozatay , b. delaet , b. viala , l. folks , b. d. terris , and m. c. cyrille , `` spin transfer induced coherent microwave emission with large power from nanoscale mgo tunnel junctions , '' _ appl . _ , vol . 93 , no . 2 , p. 022505 , 2008 . k. mufuli , s. bonetti , y. zhou , j. @xmath30kerman , and o. g. heinonen , `` mgo - based spin torque oscillators with above 0.1 @xmath15w output power , '' in _ ieee international magnetics conference _ , 2009 . h. kubota , k. yakushiji , a. fukushima , s. tamaru , m. konoto , t. nozaki , s. ishibashi , t. saruya , , s. yuasa , t. taniguchi , h. arai , and h. imamura , `` spin - torque oscillator based on magnetic tunnel junction with a perpendicularly magnetized free layer and in - plane magnetized polarizer , '' _ appl . , vol . 6 , no . 10 , p. 103003 , 2013 . p. drrenfeld , s. m. mohseni , f. gerhard , m. ranjbar , f. qejvanaj , s. r. sani , s. chung , c. gould , l. w. molenkamp , and j. @xmath30kerman , `` low- current , narrow - linewidth microwave signal generation in single - layer - nimnsb based nano - contact spin torque oscillators , '' _ unpublished manuscript _ , 2015 . w. h. rippard , m. r. pufall , s. kaka , t. j. silva , and s. e. russek , `` current - driven microwave dynamics in magnetic point contacts as a function of applied field angle , '' _ phys . b _ , vol . 70 , no . 10 , p. 100406 , 2004 . q. mistral , j .- v . kim , t. devolder , p. crozat , c. chappert , j. a. katine , m. j. carey , and k. ito , `` current - driven microwave oscillations in current perpendicular - to - plane spin - valve nanopillars , '' _ appl . _ , vol . 88 , no . 19 , p. 192507 , 2006 . j. sinha , m. hayashi , y. k. takahashi , t. taniguchi , m. drapeko , s. mitani , and k. hono , `` large amplitude microwave emission and reduced nonlinear phase noise in co@xmath32fe(ge@xmath33ga@xmath33 ) heusler alloy based pseudo spin valve nanopillar , '' _ appl . _ , vol . 99 , no . 16 , p. 162508 , 2011 . t. seki , y. sakuraba , r. okura , and k. takanashi , `` high power radio frequency oscillation by spin transfer torque in a co@xmath34mnsi layer : experiment and macrospin simulation , '' _ j. appl 113 , no . 3 , p. 033907 , 2013 . t. seki , y. sakuraba , h. arai , m. ueda , r. okura , h. imamura , and k. takanashi , `` high power all - metal spin torque oscillator using full heusler co@xmath34(fe , mn)si , '' _ appl . 105 , no . 9 , p. 092406 , 2014 . t. yamamoto , t. seki , t. kubota , h. yako , and k. takanashi , `` zero - field spin torque oscillation in co@xmath34(fe , mn)si with a point contact geometry , '' _ appl . 106 , no . 9 , p. 092406 , 2015 . r. k. dumas , s. sani , s. m. mohseni , e. iacocca , y. pogoryelov , p. k. muduli , s. chung , p. drrenfeld , and j. kerman , `` recent advances in nanocontact spin - torque oscillators , '' _ ieee trans . _ , vol . 50 , no . 6 , 2014 . a. houshang , m. fazlali , s. r. sani , p. drrenfeld , e. iacocca , j. kerman , and r. k. dumas , `` effect of excitation fatigue on the synchronization of multiple nanocontact spin - torque oscillators , '' _ ieee magn . _ , vol . 5 , p. 3000404 , 2014 . a. a. tulapurkar , y. suzuki , a. fukushima , h. kubota , h. maehara , k. tsunekawa , d. d. djayaprawira , n. watanabe , and s. yuasa , `` spin - torque diode effect in magnetic tunnel junctions , '' _ nature _ , vol . 438 , pp . 339342 , 2005 . s. ishibashi , t. seki , t. nozaki , h. kubota , s. yakata , a. fukushima , s. yuasa , h. maehara , k. tsunekawa , d. d. djayaprawira , and y. suzuki , `` large diode sensitivity of cofeb / mgo / cofeb magnetic tunnel junctions , '' _ appl . , vol . 3 , no . 7 , , 2010 . c. wang , y .- t . cui , j. z. sun , j. a. katine , r. a. buhrman , and d. c. ralph , `` sensitivity of spin - torque diodes for frequency - tunable resonant microwave detection , '' _ j. appl . 106 , no . 5 , p. 053905 , 2009 . b. fang , m. carpentieri , x. hao , h. jiang , j. a. katine , i. n. krivorotov , b. ocker , j. langer , k. l. wang , b. zhang , b. azzerboni , p. k. amiri , g. finocchio , and z. zeng , `` giant spin - torque diode sensitivity at low input power in the absence of bias magnetic field , '' _ arxiv preprint arxiv:1410.4958 _ , 2014 . h. s. choi , s. y. kang , s. j. cho , i. y. oh , m. shin , h. park , c. jang , b. c. min , s. i. kim , s. y. park , and c. s. park , `` spin nano - oscillator - based wireless communication , '' _ sci . _ , vol . 4 , p. 5486 , 2014 . m. madami , s. bonetti , g. consolo , s. tacchi , g. carlotti , g. gubbiotti , f. b. mancoff , m. a. yar , and j. kerman , `` direct observation of a propagating spin wave induced by spin - transfer torque , '' _ nature nanotech . _ , vol . 6 , pp . 635638 , 2011 . m. pufall , w. rippard , g. csaba , d. nikonov , g. bourianoff , and w. porod , `` physical implementation of coherently - coupled oscillator networks , '' _ ieee j. explor . solid - state computat . devices circuits _ , vol . pp , no . 99 , pp . 18 , 2015 . p. m. braganca , b. a. gurney , b. a. wilson , j. a. katine , s. maat , and j. r. childress , `` nanoscale magnetic field detection using a spin torque oscillator , '' _ nanotechnology _ , vol . 21 , no . 23 , p. 235202 , 2010 . s. okamoto , n. kikuchi , m. furuta , o. kitakami , and t. shimatsu , `` microwave assisted magnetic recording technologies and related physics , '' _ j. phys . _ , vol . 48 , no . 35 , p. 353001 , 2015 . ( 2015 , july ) demonstration of a new technology for a multilayer magnetic recording to realize high - density hard disk drives . [ online ] . available : https://www.toshiba.co.jp/rdc/rd/detail_e/e1507_01.html r. sato , k. kudo , t. nagasawa , h. suto , and k. mizushima , `` simulations and experiments towards high - data - transfer - rate st - mram composed of a spin - torque oscillator , '' _ ieee trans . _ , vol . 48 , no . 5 , 2012 . i. firastrau , d. gusakova , d. houssameddine , u. ebels , m .- c . cyrille , b. delaet , b. dieny , o. redon , j .- c . toussaint , and l. d. buda - prejbeanu , `` modeling of the perpendicular polarizer - planar free layer spin torque oscillator : micromagnetic simulations , '' _ phys . rev . b _ , vol . 78 , no . 2 , p. 024437 , 2008 . t. chen , a. eklund , e. iaccoca , b. g. malm , s. rodriguez , j. kerman , and a. rusu , `` comprehensive and macrospin - based magnetic tunnel junction spin torque oscillator model - part i : analytical model of the mtj sto , '' _ ieee trans . on electron devices _ 62 , no . 3 , pp . 10371044 , 2015 . t. chen , a. eklund , e. iaccoca , b. g. malm , s. rodriguez , j. kerman , and a. rusu , `` comprehensive and macrospin - based magnetic tunnel junction spin torque oscillator model- part ii : verilog - a model implementation , '' _ ieee trans . on electron devices _ 62 , no . 3 , pp . 10451051 , 2015 . h. lim , s. ahn , m. kim , s. lee , and h. shin , `` a new circuit model for spin - torque oscillator including perpendicular torque of magnetic tunnel junction , '' _ adv . matter phys . 2013 , p. 169312 , 2013 . m. kim , h. lim , s. ahn , s. lee , and h. shin , `` advanced circuit - level model of magnetic tunnel junction - based spin - torque oscillator with perpendicular anisotropy field , '' _ j. semicond _ , vol . 13 , pp . 556561 , 2013 . t. chen , a. eklund , s. sani , s. rodriguez , b. g. malm , j. kerman , and a. rusu , `` integration of gmr - based spin torque oscillators and cmos circuitry , '' _ solid state electron . 111 , pp . 9199 , 2015 . ( 2010 , february ) `` fujitsu and university of toronto develop high - reliability read - method for spin - torque - transfer mram , next - generation non - volatile memory '' . [ online ] . available : http://www.fujitsu.com/global/about/resources/news/press-releases/2010/0210-03.html k. ikegami , h. noguchi , c. kamata , m. amano , k. abe , k. kushida , e. kitagawa , t. ochiai , n. shimomura , a. kawasumi , h. hara , j. ito , and s. fujita , `` a 4ns , 0.9 v write voltage embedded perpendicular stt - mram fabricated by mtj - last process , '' in _ proceedings of technical program-2014 international symposium on vlsi technology , systems and application ( vlsi - tsa)_.1em plus 0.5em minus 0.4emieee , 2014 , pp . n. d. rizzo , d. houssameddine , j. janesky , r. whig , f. b. mancoff , m. l. schneider , m. deherrera , j. j. sun , k. nagel , s. deshpande , h. j. chia , s. m. alam , t. andre , s. aggarwal , and j. m. slaughter , `` a fully functional 64 mb ddr3 st - mram built on 90 nm cmos technology , '' _ ieee trans . _ , vol . 49 , no . 7 , pp . 44414446 , 2013 . j. m. shaw , h. t. nembach , and t. j. silva , `` roughness induced magnetic inhomogeneity in co / ni multilayers : ferromagnetic resonance and switching properties in nanostructures , '' _ j. appl . 108 , no . 9 , p. 093922 , 2010 . j. wagner , r. wolf , n. joram , and f. ellinger , `` 0.59 ghz cmos variable gain amplifier with control linearization , low phase variations and self - matching , '' in _ european microwave integrated circuit conference ( eumic ) , 2014 9th _ , 2014 , pp . 100103 . tingsu chen ( s11 ) received an m.sc . degree in system - on - chip design from the kth royal institute of technology , sweden , 2011 . she is currently working toward a ph.d . degree at kth in the research area of modeling spin - torque oscillators and designing high - frequency circuits for spin - torque oscillator technology . randy k. dumas ( member ieee ) received his ph.d . in physics from the university of california , davis on the topic of reversal mechanisms in magnetic nanostructures in 2009 . from 20092012 , he was a postdoctoral research fellow at the university of gothenburg , where he is currently a permanent researcher . his research interests include the fabrication and characterization of magnetic nanostructures with a current focus on magnonics . anders eklund ( s13 ) received an m.sc . degree in engineering physics from kth royal institute of technology , sweden , in 2011 . he is currently working towards a ph.d . degree in physics at kth , experimentally investigating the frequency stability and mode structure of spin - torque oscillators by means of electrical characterization and synchrotron x - ray measurements . pranaba k. muduli ( member ieee ) received his ph.d . degree in physics from the humboldt university , berlin , germany in 2005 . he did postdoctoral research work at the university of north carolina , usa , the royal institute of technology , sweden , and the university of gothenburg , sweden . since july 2012 , he has been an assistant professor at the indian institute of technology delhi , india . he is also a researcher at the university of gothenburg , sweden . his current research interests include spintronics and nanomagnetism with an emphasis on spin - torque induced magnetization dynamics . afshin houshang ( s12 ) received his m.sc . in electroceramics engineering from shiraz university , shiraz , iran , 2010 . he is currently working towards a ph.d . degree in physics at the university of gothenburg in the area of synchronization phenomena in spin - torque and spin hall oscillators . ahmad a. awad ( member ieee ) received his ph.d . in physics from the autonomous university of madrid , spain , on high frequency magnetization and vortex dynamics in both magnetic and superconducting nanostructures in 2012 . since 2014 , he has been a postdoctoral research fellow at the university of gothenburg , sweden . his research interests include the characterization of magnetic nanostructures and spintronic devices with a focus on spin - torque induced magnetization dynamics . philipp drrenfeld ( s11 ) has a dipl .- ing . univ . degree ( 2010 ) from the university of wrzburg , germany . in 2015 , he received his ph.d . in physics from the university of gothenburg , sweden on the topic of spin - torque and spin hall nano - oscillators with single magnetic layers . his research interests include the nanofabrication and electrical characterization of spintronics and magnonics devices . b. gunnar malm ( m98 - sm10 ) was born in stockholm , sweden , in 1972 . he received an m.s . from uppsala university , sweden in 1997 and a phd in solid - state electronics from the royal institute of technology ( kth ) , stockholm in 2002 . he has been an associate professor at the school of ict , kth since 2011 . his recent work includes silicon photonics , silicon - carbide technology for extreme environments , and spintronics . he also serves on the kth sustainability council . ana rusu ( m92 ) received an m.sc . degree in electronics and telecommunications from the technical university of iasi , romania in 1983 , and a ph.d . degree in electronics from the technical university of cluj - napoca , romania , in 1998 . she has been with kth royal institute of technology , stockholm , sweden , since 2001 , where she is professor in electronic circuits for integrated systems . her research interests include low / ultralow - power high - performance cmos circuits and systems , sto - based systems , rf graphene , and high temperature sic circuits . johan @xmath30kerman ( m06 ) gained an ing . dipl . degree in 1994 from epfl , switzerland , an m.sc . in physics in 1996 from lth , sweden , and a ph.d . in materials physics in 2000 from kth royal institute of technology , stockholm . in 2008 , he was appointed full professor at the university of gothenburg and is a guest professor at kth royal institute of technology . he is also the founder of nanosc ab and nanosc instruments ab . Abstract:

Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.

Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered . Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video . Paper: studying the properties of resolved stellar populations through color - magnitude diagrams ( cmds ) can provide important constraints on stellar evolution and on the formation and evolution of stellar systems . for example , the apparent magnitude of the horizontal branch ( hb ) stars in a population , or the magnitude and color of the main sequence turn - off ( msto ) , constrain or allow determination of the distance to and age and metallicity of the population . the most detailed and most objectively quantifiable information can be obtained by a numerical cmd fitting analysis ( see e.g. * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ) . over the last seven years , the sloan digital sky survey ( sdss , * ? * ; * ? ? ? * ) , has performed a large wide - field photometric and spectroscopic survey in the northern galactic cap . because sdss , unlike previous all - sky surveys , is a ccd - based survey , the photometric depth , accuracy , and homogeneity achieved is unprecedented over such a large area . sdss data have proven to be of great value for the study of the galactic stellar halo and nearby stellar systems with resolved populations ( e.g. * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? they have also led to the discovery of a host of previously unknown , faint local group members @xcite . the study of dwarf galaxies and the milky way halo can provide important clues to the formation and assembly of the local group of galaxies and its individual constituents , as well as test cosmological theories . in the cold dark matter ( cdm ) paradigm , an abundance of subhaloes should be present around milky way type galaxies . the observed number of satellites is , however , one or two orders of magnitudes lower than what cdm theory predicts @xcite . the recently discovered satellites partially alleviate this discrepancy , but if the cdm predictions are accurate , many more new satellite galaxies are to be discovered . another prediction of cdm theories is that galaxies are formed hierarchically , i.e. built up by accreting smaller systems ( e.g. * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ) . among the population of satellite galaxies surrounding the mw , some should have been formed within the mw halo while others should have a different origin studying the stellar populations , masses and abundance patterns of these satellites can provide important constraints for galaxy formation and cdm theory . our goals for this paper are two - fold . first , we adapt the cmd - fitting software match @xcite for use on sdss data , making use of the theoretical isochrones provided by @xcite , and describe several methods of applying this software to the data . a set of globular clusters taken from the sdss data is used to test both the algorithmic approach and the theoretical isochrones . second , we apply match to the sdss data for the new milky way satellites ( that were recently discovered using the same sdss data ) , to provide a uniform analysis of these objects and constrain their population parameters . in section [ sec : methods ] we describe the data and the different cmd - fitting methods . the tests on globular clusters are done in section [ sec : gctests ] and in section [ sec : newsats ] we analyze the properties of the new galactic satellites . we conclude and summarize our results in section [ sec : summary ] . the sdss is a large photometric and spectroscopic survey , primarily covering the north galactic cap . as of the data release 5 ( dr5 , * ? ? ? * ) , sdss photometry covers almost a quarter of the sky in five passbands ( @xmath0 , @xmath1 , @xmath2 , @xmath3 , and @xmath4 ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? for the work presented in this paper we use photometry in the two most sensitive bands , namely @xmath1 and @xmath2 . a fully automated data reduction pipeline produces accurate astrometric and photometric measurements for all detected objects @xcite . photometric accuracy is on the order of 2% down to @xmath522.5 and @xmath622 @xcite , and comparison with deeper surveys has shown that the data are complete to @xmath622 . we use stellar data extracted from the sdss archive with artifacts removed and we apply the extinction corrections from @xcite provided by dr5 . in order for the cmd fitting with match to work , a model describing the completeness and the photometric accuracy as a function of magnitude is needed . completeness has been checked for @xmath2-band by comparing detection of stars and galaxies by sdss with the deeper combo-17 survey . for stellar sources the completeness is 100% to @xmath2=22 and then drops to 0% at r=23.5 . since the stellar classification of combo-17 starts to become incomplete at approximately one magnitude fainter than in sdss , this completeness is not extremely accurate , but amply sufficient for our purposes . the photometric errors given by the automated reduction pipeline have been found to be very accurate @xcite . comparison of the photometric accuracy in @xmath1 and @xmath2 as a function of apparent magnitude shows similar behavior , but in @xmath1 the rise in the uncertainties occurs some 0.5 magnitudes fainter . for the @xmath1-band completeness we assume similar behavior as in @xmath2 , but also shifted half a magnitude fainter . using this information we create artificial star test files that are given as input to our cmd fitting code . from this , the code creates the photometric accuracy and completeness model with which the theoretical population models are then convolved . figure [ fig : fakedetails ] shows the completeness and average photometric errors of our artificial star files for the @xmath1- and @xmath2-band separately . even though differences in , for example , seeing cause differences in photometric accuracy and completeness between different parts of the sky , we use this same average model in the remainder of this paper . several software packages have been developed for quantitative and algorithmic cmd ( or hess diagram ) fitting ( e.g. * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? the strength of these methods lies in the fact that all photometric information from imaging in two bands can be used simultaneously in a robust and numerically well - defined way . the software package we use is match , which was written and successfully used for the cmd analysis of globular clusters and dwarf galaxies @xcite . the software works by converting an observed cmd into a hess diagram ( a two - dimensional histogram of stellar density as a function of color and magnitude ; * ? ? ? * ) and comparing it with synthetic hess diagrams of model populations . to create these synthetic hess diagrams , theoretical isochrones are convolved with a model of the photometric accuracy and completeness . the use of hess diagrams enables a pixel - by - pixel comparison of observations to models and a maximum - likelihood technique is used to find the best - fitting single model , or best linear combination of models . to account for contamination by fore- and background stars , a `` control field '' cmd needs to be provided . match will then use the control field hess diagram as an extra ` model population ' that can be scaled up or down . the resulting output will be the best - fitting linear combination of population models plus the control field . to construct star formation histories ( sfhs ) and age - metallicity relations ( amrs ) , a set of theoretical isochrones is needed that spans a sufficient range of ages , masses and metallicities . when match was written , the only published set of isochrones with full age and metallicity coverage available was provided by @xcite . since we are specifically interested in the application to sdss data , we need isochrones in the sdss photometric system . the only set available to date is one from @xcite and has the same parameter space coverage . some worries exist about the accuracy of the isochrone calibration ( e.g. * ? ? ? * ) , which was limited to three systems available in the first data release ( dr1 ) of sdss . this unavoidably adds an extra source of uncertainty to all cmd fitting results . one of the main motivations for the various tests that are described in this paper is to see whether reasonable results can be obtained using the current @xcite isochrones . we use match for slightly different purposes than originally described by @xcite ; the new `` modes '' are described briefly below . match was originally developed to solve for the sfh and amr of a stellar system for which all stars can be assumed to be at the same distance , such as globular clusters and dwarf galaxies . in this original mode of match the distance and the foreground extinction to all stars are fixed a priori for each fit . from a set of age bins and metallicity bins , the combination that best fits the observed cmd is found , resulting in an estimate of the sfh and amr . by doing the same fit with different values of the foreground extinction and distance , these two latter parameters can also be determined by comparing the goodness - of - fit of the individual fits . in principle , parameters like the steepness of the imf and the binary fraction can be constrained in the same fashion , although in most cases the data quality and the degeneracies between different parameters will prevent the determination of all of these parameters simultaneously . analyzing the parameter range of acceptable fits also gives robust error estimates for the sfh and amr ; this approach we refer to as match s `` standard mode '' . to apply cmd fitting techniques to nearby and extended stellar systems ( for example substructure within the milky way as in @xcite ) , the assumption that all stars are practically equidistant need not hold . to fit populations at differing distances simultaneously we have implemented a new way in which to run match that keeps the same number of free parameters , or parameter dimensions , to be explored . while in the standard mode the distance is fixed and age and metallicity are independent variables , here the distance becomes a free parameter , but age and metallicity are being limited via a specified age metallicity relation ( amr ) . for any given amr there is only one `` population parameter '' , e.g. age with a certain metallicity linked to each age bin . of course , different age - metallicity relations can be explored , potentially covering a wide range of possibilities . it seems sensible to choose an amr that is appropriate for the studied stellar population on astrophysical grounds , such as the expected or known metallicity evolution . for example , for the study of structures in the galactic thin disk one would consider a different amr than for the study of a metal - poor dwarf galaxy . however , within this new mode of running match the choice of amr is completely flexible and a flat amr ( no dependence of metallicity on age ) or even an amr where metallicity decreases with time is possible . when studying low - luminosity or low surface brightness contrast systems , such as some of the recently discovered dsphs , or systems at low galactic latitudes , for example substructures in the milky way , the contamination of the cmds of these systems by fore- and background stars will be very high . if the ratio of ` member ' stars to field stars becomes low , the s / n of the cmd features to be fit consequently becomes very low . in such cases , all free parameters used to constrain distance , age , and metallicity in the match mode of sections [ subsec : sfhamr ] and [ subsec : distsol ] can no longer be constrained by the data alone . to test a more restricted set of hypotheses in the case of low s / n systems we have developped a single component ( sc ) fitting mode for match . in this mode , template stellar population models are created that consist of a single component with given , fixed distance , foreground extinction , age range and metallicity range . such a sc template is fit to the data together with a control field . since the template consists of a single component , the only free parameters during the fit are the absolute scaling of ( i.e. the number of stars in ) the template and the control field . for each individual sc ( i.e. for each combination of distance , foreground extinction , age range and metallicity range ) , a value of the goodness - of - fit is obtained . comparing the goodness - of - fit values for all the sc s we can then find the best - fitting templates and thus constrain the overall properties of the system . the quality of each fit is expressed by the goodness - of - fit parameter q , determined using the maximum - likelihood technique described in @xcite . this statistic is meant to measure how likely it is that the observed distribution of stars would result from a random drawing from the fitted model . in the sc fitting scheme we know that our fits will not be perfect since an sc model will not be a perfect representation of a real stellar population , but we are primarily interested in a likelihood - ratio test for a range of sc models . the expected variance in the parameter @xmath7 for a certain cmd can be calculated from poisson statistics and also obtained from monte carlo simulations using random drawings from the models . all fits with a value of @xmath7 less than 1 @xmath8 away from that of the best - fit sc model can be considered statistically acceptable , under the assumption that the best fit is a reasonable representation of the data . taking all these fits together , error estimates on the fit parameters can be determined from the encountered spread of the parameter values . this approach of using relative values of @xmath7 should only be used in cases where the `` best fit '' is a reasonable approximation of the data . in cases where there are several very different prominent stellar populations this will not be the case and results will break down . studying different parts of the cmd separately can help to circumvent such problems , as is done in @xcite and also in section [ subsec : nsscfits ] of this paper for the dwarf galaxy leo t. the same cmd fitting techniques can also be used to detect or verify , faint stellar over - densities in large datasets like that of the sdss survey . in case of an overdensity at a specific distance , the stars will not only cluster around a certain spatial position , but also along a certain locus in the cmd . the method we have developped works by fitting the cmd of a small target patch of sky both with a control cmd obtained from a large area around the target patch and with the same control field plus a simple stellar population model . if no over - density is present , the fit with the control cmd should be good and no significant improvement in fit quality will result by including an extra stellar population model . however , if there is an over - density present and the parameters of the population model , such as distance , age and metallicity , are close enough to those of the over - density , the fit including the model will result in a significant improvement in the fit quality . by doing this for a range of models the presence of a stellar over - density can be assessed by looking at the difference in the fit quality parameter , @xmath9 , between the control cmd fit and the control cmd plus model fit . moreover , by comparing the values of @xmath9 for different models , a rough estimate of the properties of the overdensity can be obtained at the same time . an important prerequisite for this method is of course that the over - density should contribute a larger fraction of the total number of stars to the target cmd than to the control cmd , and ideally should be contained completely within the target patch . this means that over - densities will be detected with the highest s / n if their size matches the size of the target patch . cccc 1 & 1013 & @xmath101.5 & 14.5 + 2 & 1013 & @xmath101.7 & 14.5 + & 22.5 & @xmath101.3 & 14.5 + 3 & 1013 & @xmath101.5 & 20.5 + 4 & 1013 & @xmath101.7 & 20.5 + & 22.5 & @xmath101.3 & 20.5 + [ tab : fakegcprops ] before turning to real data it is useful to get a feel for the degree of precision that we can expect cmd fits to achieve . to do this , we create a few realistic artificial cmds and apply sfh fitting , sc fitting and distance fitting methods to these to try and recover their properties . using the theoretical isochrones from @xcite , a salpeter initial mass function @xcite , and our model for the photometric errors and completeness of the sdss data , we generate artificial stellar populations , to which field stars taken from the sdss data are added . in total we create four cmds , shown in figure [ fig : fakecmds ] . the number of stars in each cmd is chosen to be the same , to make for a fair comparison . cmds 1 and 3 contain a simple , single burst stellar population , located at different distances , so that either the ms and msto or the rgb and hb are prominent features . artificial cmds 2 and 4 contain two different age and metallicity populations , again with the cmds corresponding to different distances . the detailed parameters of the artificial populations are listed in table [ tab : fakegcprops ] . from the sdss archives all stellar sources in a 5@xmath115 patch of sky close to the globular cluster m13 were extracted and a small fraction used to create the field star contamination in these cmds . the remaining sources will be used as a `` control field '' population when fitting these background contaminated cmds . we recover the sfhs of the artificial cmds by running match with nine age bins and twelve metallicity bins . the age bins are defined in log @xmath12 because the isochrones are spaced more evenly in log @xmath12 than in @xmath12 , with the oldest running from 10.0 to 10.2 ( 10 gyr to 15.8 gyr ) and the youngest from 8.6 to 8.8 ( 400 myr to 630 myr ) . the metallicity range of [ fe / h]@xmath132.4 to 0.0 is covered by twelve bins of 0.2 dex width . thus , the artificial cmds are fit with 108 model cmds plus the `` control field '' stars , for a total of 109 partial cmds . the best fitting linear combination of model cmds will form the resulting sfh and metallicity evolution . to get a sense of the uncertainties on the sfh , each cmd is fit thrice , each time with a slightly different assumed distance . the distance moduli used are 14.3 , 14.4 and 14.5 mag . the resulting sfhs and metallicities are presented in figure [ fig : fakesfhamr ] as the relative star formation rate ( sfr ) and as [ fe / h ] as function of the age of the stars . for the sc fits models are created for a grid of parameters with a distance modulus range of 2.0 with 0.1 magnitude intervals centered on the the actual distance modulus ( table [ tab : fakegcprops ] ) . ages used run from 9.0 to 10.2 in log @xmath12 with bin widths of 0.1 dex and metallicities go from [ fe / h]@xmath132.1 to 0.0 in steps of 0.1 dex and bin widths of 0.2 dex . each model plus the `` control field '' is fit to an artificial cmd , after which the resulting goodness - of - fit values are compared . the resulting contour plots showing the best - fitting parameter combinations are shown in figure [ fig : fakescfit ] . using the new distance solution option of match we solve for the sfh of the artificial cmds again while fixing the metallicity to a single , uniform value . the same age bins are used as for the sfh fits described above , and a distance range of 3.0 is probed with 0.1 magnitude resolution . including the `` control field '' , 271 partial cmds are used in these fits . the fits are done at three different values of the metallicity : [ fe / h]@xmath131.6 , @xmath101.5 , and @xmath101.4 to probe the uncertainties . figure [ fig : fakesfhdist ] shows the resulting sfhs in relative sfrs and distance determinations . the sfhs in figures [ fig : fakesfhamr ] and [ fig : fakesfhdist ] show that the software succesfully recovers the single burst in cmds 1 and 2 , and the two distinct episodes of star formation in cmds 3 and 4 . some bleeding of star formation in adjacent bins will occur even when the fitted age bins exactly match the input sfh @xcite . therefore it is to be expected that this also happens here , since the duration of the input star forming episodes do not match any age bins perfectly . it should be noted that the error bars in the sfhs represent the range of sfrs encountered in each age bin within the three fits on which the sfhs are based , which means that the errors between adjacent bins are correllated . for example , in the sfh of cmd 4 in figure [ fig : fakesfhamr ] the two bins at ages of 2 to 4 gyr are not independent ; when the sfr in one of them is low , it is high in the other . that the age found for the young population in cmd 4 in figure [ fig : fakesfhdist ] is the natural result of the metallicities in the fit being lower than the actual metallicity of the younger population . in all cases , the average metallicities and distances found in figures [ fig : fakesfhamr ] and [ fig : fakesfhdist ] agree well with the input values . turning to the sc fits in figure [ fig : fakescfit ] , we see that for cmds 1 and 3 , the input properties ( indicated by stars ) are recovered very well . because there is a degeneracy between distance , age and metallicity when only the ms and msto are seen , the properties of cmd 1 are , however , constrained more poorly than for cmd 3 . since the sc fits use a single model population , the results for cmds with multiple populations , such as cmds 2 and 4 , can not be expected to properly recover the properties of all stars . rather , the population representing the majority of stars in the cmd will have the strongest weight . this is clearly visible in the sc fitting results for cmd 4 , that recover the properties of the older population , that dominates the star counts in the rgb and hb . for cmd 2 , however , the upper ms and msto of the younger population has such high s / n that this population does influence the sc fits significantly and the favored age is relatively young ( @xmath144 gyr ) . this shows that for high s / n cmds with a complex stellar population make - up , the sc fits is not well suited ; they were , however , developed for application to low s / n cmds . what distinguishes these artificial cmds from the real data , is that the artificial stellar populations are based on the exact same isochrones , imf , and photometric error and completeness model as used by match . inaccuracies in any of these will degrade the fit results one obtains for real data compared to the results for the artificial data . lccccc m 13 & 7.7 , 7.5@xmath15 & 14.38 , 14.43 & @xmath101.54 & 12@xmath15 & 0.019 + m 15 & 10.3 , 10.0@xmath16 & 15.37 , 15.0@xmath16 & @xmath102.26 & 13.2@xmath16 & 0.11 + m 92 & 8.2 & 14.6 & @xmath102.28 & 14@xmath17 & 0.025 + ngc 2419 & 84.2 , 98.6@xmath18 & 19.63 , 19.97@xmath18 & @xmath102.12 & 14@xmath18 & 0.060 + ngc 6229 & 30.4 & 17.44 & @xmath101.43 , @xmath101.1@xmath19 & @xmath1411.5@xmath20 & 0.023 + pal 14 & 73.9 & 19.34 & @xmath101.52 & @xmath1410@xmath21 & 0.035 + [ tab : gcproperties ] globular clusters are ideal test cases for the sdss implementation of match since in most of them their stars have been found to be of a single age and nearly single metallicity . here we will use six gcs present in the sdss data to test how well match , using the isochrones from @xcite , can recover their known population properties . the systems in question , , , , , , and , cover a large range in distance , background contrast ( i.e. ratio of member stars versus field stars ) and have metallicities between [ fe / h]@xmath22 and @xmath23 dex . for the following tests , all stars within a 5@xmath115 field centered on each gc were obtained from the sdss catalog archive server ( cas ) . it should be noted that in the cases of m15 , m92 and ngc 2419 these fields were not completely covered by the dr5 footprint . flags were used to exclude objects with poor photometry and all stars were individually corrected for foreground extinction using the correction factors provided by dr5 and based on the maps by @xcite . any contamination of the samples of stars obtained by misclassified galaxies or other contaminants do not pose problems for our analysis because of the use of control fields that should contain the same populations of these contaminants . `` control field '' cmds were constructed from all stars outside a radius of 0.5 from the center of each gc . `` target fields '' were constructed by selecting stars within a certain radius from the center . the radii used for m13 , m15 , m92 , ngc 2419 , ngc 6229 , and pal 14 are 0.25 , 0.2 , 0.25 , 0.15 , 0.15 , and 0.1 , respectively . these radii are similar to the tidal radii of the gcs but are not strictly related to them , since in all clusters and especially in the densest ( m13 and m15 ) the sdss photometry in the central parts is missing due to the high degree of crowding . with the radii used , a significant number of field stars is present in each target cmd , so that match has a good handle on the proper scaling of the control cmd . the sdss cmds of the gcs are shown in figure [ fig : gccmds ] and their previously measured parameters ( distance , age , [ fe / h ] ) are listed in table [ tab : gcproperties ] ; the mean reddening @xmath24 in magnitudes according to the @xcite maps in the target area for each gc is also listed in the table . the gcs in the three top panels in figure [ fig : gccmds ] have metallicities of around [ fe / h]@xmath25 dex , and the gcs in the lower panels are more metal - poor ( [ fe / h]@xmath26 ) . for the more nearby systems ( m13 , m15 , m92 and ngc 6229 ) the main cmd features that will drive the fits are the main sequence ( ms ) and main sequence turn off ( msto ) ; for the more distant systems ( ngc 2419 and pal 14 ) only the red giant branch ( rgb ) and horizontal branch ( hb ) are observed . pal 14 in particular represents the case of a very sparsely populated system with high contamination from field stars . in the following subsections , we discuss the results of applying match to these gcs in the four different modes described in section [ sec : modes ] . in fitting the cmds of these objects we will use a color range of @xmath27 , and limit the magnitude range to @xmath28 and @xmath29 ; the color cut includes the msto and the tip of the rgb , but excludes a large fraction of the numerous low - mass foreground stars . for all the fits in this section we will assume a slope for the stellar initial mass function that is close to salpeter ; the binary fraction is assumed to be 0.1 , in line with recent observational and theoretical evidence for low binary fractions in globulars ( e.g. , * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? to measure the sfh and amr of the clusters we run match fits with nine age bins and twelve metallicity bins . because the isochrones are spaced more evenly in log @xmath12 than in @xmath12 , the age bins are defined to have equal width in log @xmath12 , with the oldest running from 10.0 to 10.2 ( 10 gyr to 15.8 gyr ) and the youngest from 8.6 to 8.8 ( 400 myr to 630 myr ) . the metallicity bins cover the range from [ fe / h]@xmath132.4 to 0.0 in twelve bins of 0.2 dex width . together with the control cmd this yields 109 model cmds for each gc . the fitting software then finds the linear combination of these model cmds that best fits the observed cmd . each object is fit several times with slightly different fixed distances to determine the impact of distance errors on the recovered solutions . in the cases of m15 and ngc 2419 , where values from the literature for the distance modulus are quite discrepant , we run fits for distance moduli of 15.0 to 15.4 ( m15 ) and 19.6 to 20.0 ( ngc 2419 ) in 0.1 magnitude steps . for the other clusters we run three fits each , one at the literature value and at 0.1 magnitude further and nearer . figure [ fig : gcsfh ] shows the results of these fits , with the fractional sfr as a function of time in the left column , and the metallicity as a function of time in the right column . metallicities are only plotted for age bins with a significant sfr . the plotted sfr for a given age bin is the average of the values given by the fits at the different distances , with the error bars showing the complete range of sfr values found . the metallicity in a bin is the average of the fits weighted by the sfr , and the error bars correspond to the standard deviation . looking at the three intermediate metallicity gcs in the top half of figure [ fig : gcsfh ] we see that in all cases match infers a purely old ( @xmath307 gyr ) population , as expected . for m13 and ngc 6229 practically all stars are found to be older than 10 gyrs ; some bleeding into the second oldest age bin is always likely to occur , cf . section [ subsec : fakegc ] and @xcite . in the case of pal 14 the sfr is found to be constant over the two oldest age bins , but this only confirms the age estimate of @xmath1410 gyr @xcite , which implies that star formation would likely have been spread over these two bins . the intermediate metallicities of m13 , ngc 6229 and pal 14 are reproduced well and our recovered values are within 0.1 to 0.2 dex of the literature values . for ngc 6229 our fits favor the slightly lower metallicity from @xcite rather than the higher value from @xcite . turning to the bottom half of figure [ fig : gcsfh ] with the three metal - poor clusters , we see that here also the results are consistent with a purely old population , although the sfhs of m15 and ngc 2419 show a non - zero sfr in a few younger age bins . in the case of m15 this is due to the blue horizontal branch ( bhb ) stars that are not properly reproduced by the theoretical isochrones , causing the code to fit them as a younger turn - off . this demonstrates that cmd fitting results always need to be looked at in detail in order to understand their implications . the age distribution in ngc 2419 is not very well constrained because no msto is present in the cmd . the metallicities of m15 and m92 are recovered well for the old stars . while the estimated metallicity of @xmath101.9 for ngc 2419 is on the high side , for these metal - poor gcs the recovered metallicities are within 0.2 dex of the literature values . as described in section [ subsec : scfit ] above , in the single component ( sc ) fitting mode an individual model cmd is fit to the data together with the control cmd , rather than a whole set of models . the results therefore provide information on the characteristic properties of the dominant stellar population in the cmd . we sample the 3d parameter space of distance , age and metallicity by using one of nine age bins , one of 21 distance bins , and one of 23 metallicity bins . the age bins have a width of 0.1 log - years , going from 10.1 - 10.2 log - years ( 12.5 gyr to 15.8 gyr ) to 9.7 - 9.8 log - years ( 5 gyr to 6.3 gyr ) in steps of 0.05 log - years . this age range more than suffices for these gcs . we use a distance modulus range of two magnitudes centered on the literature value with a resolution of 0.1 magnitude . metallicity bins are centered at [ fe / h]@xmath132.2 to 0.0 with an inter - bin distance of 0.1 dex and a width of 0.2 dex . after matching each of the 4347 sc options to each gc and determining the expected variance in the goodness - of - fit parameter @xmath7 , we take the best fit as our measurement and compare the other fits with respect to these best values . the resulting likelihood contour plots for metallicity , distance and age measurements are shown in figure [ fig : gcscfit ] . note that in these contour plots , the third parameter is unconstrained , rather than fixed at its known value . if the third parameter would be kept fixed , the contours would shrink significantly . in general the agreement with the literature values ( indicated with asterisks in figure [ fig : gcscfit ] ) is very good . the small offset for m13 is most likely due to inaccuracies in the isochrones , which illustrates the added uncertainty in cmd fitting results that depend on a single set of theoretical isochrones . our distance modulus measurement from the sc fits for m15 lies exactly in between the two literature values , while for ngc 2419 our results clearly favor the smaller distance value from @xcite . from the two metallicity determinations in the literature for ngc 6229 , the fit results agree significantly better with the lower metallicity of [ fe / h]@xmath311.4 dex . in some cases , it looks as if the peak of the likelihood lies outside of the parameter space probed , at lower metallicities or older ages . unfortunately , these limits of the parameter space are dictated by the parameter range of the available isochrones . also shown in the right column of figure [ fig : gcscfit ] are the observed cmds of the gcs , with contours representing the model populations . in most cases we used the literature parameters for these models , except for m15 , where we chose a distance modulus of 15.2 , the mean of the two different available values . for ngc 6229 and ngc 2419 we use the literature metallicities and distance moduli that best correspond to our results . the agreement of model and data is generally acceptable , although inaccuracies , especially in the sub - giant branch , can be seen in m13 and m15 . important to note is the influence of the degeneracies between age , distance , and metallicity . for the nearby systems , m13 , m15 and m92 , where the fit is driven by the ms , there is a clear distance - metallicity covariance ; the left - most panels in figure [ fig : gcscfit ] show that the distance estimate increases with increasing metallicity . for the distant gc pal 14 , where the fit is driven by the rgb , the covariance is the other way around . another important , yet not wholly surprising , point is that higher s / n in the cmd features results in much tighter contours , illustrated by the fact that m13 , m15 and ngc 2419 give the best constrained results . ngc 2419 has the additional advantage that the well - populated hb provides a very strong constraint on the distance , making this system the best - constrained of the lot . as mentioned in section [ subsec : distsol ] , we explore fits for different distances and different ages , with the metallicity linked to the age . the result of each fit is a sfh with a ( potentially different ) distance for each age bin ; differing distances for different sub - populations are not astrophysically relevant for globular clusters , but serve as a test case . for fitting the gcs it seems reasonable to use the same metallicity in all age bins . we use the same nine age bins as in section [ subsec : gcsfh ] . in distance space we use a distance modulus range of three magnitudes centered on the known distance of each system with a resolution of 0.1 magnitudes , giving a total of 31 distance bins . for each gc we carry out three fits with different metallicities , centered on the literature values ( see table [ tab : gcproperties ] ) with offsets of 0.1 dex . for ngc 6229 we assume the lower metallicity value [ fe / h]@xmath131.43 , which is favored by our sfh and single component fitting results . in figure [ fig : gcdfit ] we present the age - distance distributions that result from these fits . compared to the fits in section [ subsec : gcsfh ] the number of free parameters per fit is the same , with now metallicity fixed instead of distance . thus , in general similar quality sfhs should be expected , although not necessarily exactly the same . while in the `` standard '' sfh fits the star formation within an age bin can be spread over several metallicity bins , it can now be spread over several distance bins . these spread will translate differently into the color - magnitude plane , and therefore can result in differences between the sfhs in figures [ fig : gcsfh ] and [ fig : gcdfit ] . as in figure [ fig : gcsfh ] all gcs are found to have a single peak in their sfr in the oldest age bin , in some cases with some bleeding into the adjacent bin . the extension of the sfh of pal 14 to more recent times has large uncertainties and is not significant . it should be taken into account that the exact age of this system is difficult to constrain with sdss data , since the msto is not present . interesting to see is that m13 and m92 show almost no bleeding into the second oldest age bin here , while they did in figure [ fig : gcsfh ] ; for m15 and ngc 6229 the exact opposite is the case . apparently , the former are fit better with some distance spread , while the latter benefit more from a metallicity spread . this does not necessarily reflect an actual distance or metallicity spread , but rather shows that inaccuracies in the isochrones are sometimes better accounted for one way and sometimes another way . the distances we find for the oldest age bin , and therefore for the majority of the stars , show very good agreement with the literature values . comparing figures [ fig : gcsfh ] and [ fig : gcdfit ] shows that the sfhs obtained when fixing either the distance or the metallicity are very similar . the main motivation for enabling this distance fitting mode was , however , not to analyze single - distance systems , but to be able to cope with cases where stars are located at different distances ( cf . canis major , * ? ? ? * ) . to demonstrate this application , we combine the cmds of m13 and ngc 6229 , resulting in a cmd containing two populations with similar metallicities and ages , but located at significantly different distances . the cmds of m13 , ngc 6229 and the combined cmd are shown in panels a ) , b ) and c ) of figure [ fig : m13ngc6229 ] . we run distance solution fits to these cmds in the same way as before , with the same age bins , but now using a larger distance modulus range , from 12.0 to 19.0 magnitudes with a resolution of 0.2 magnitudes . three fits are run , for uniform metallicities of [ fe / h]@xmath131.4 , @xmath101.5 , and @xmath101.6 . we include also a control cmd in the fit which is the control cmd of m 13 ; since m 13 and ngc 6229 are only 10 degrees apart and at similar galactic latitudes , this gives good results . the averaged best - fitting distributions of stars over the grid of age and distance bins are shown in panels d ) , e ) and f ) of figure [ fig : m13ngc6229 ] . both ages and distances of the two populations are recovered extremely well , with all stars in the oldest age bin ( @xmath3010 gyr ) , m13 stars centered at a distance modulus of 14.4 and ngc 6229 stars at a distance modulus of 17.4 . moreover , the result for the combined cmd is almost exactly the sum of the results for the individual cmds , clearly illustrating the power of match to decompose more complex cmds . the final application we describe and test here is aimed at algorithmically detecting stellar populations which are confined to a limited distance and area on the sky , i.e. that form `` overdensities '' . of course , the gcs used in this section are very obvious stellar overdensities and should be detected at very high s / n . following the approach described in section [ subsec : detect ] we define a grid of 20@xmath1120 boxes in each 5@xmath115 field that was obtained from the sdss catalog server , with the central box centered on the gc . the cmd of each box is fit with the control field cmd and with the control field plus a simple population model . for each gc we use a model with the appropriate distance , age and metallicity . figure [ fig : gcareas ] shows the difference in the goodness - of - fit parameter @xmath7 between the two fits for areas around each gc . note that for m15 and m92 , the 5@xmath115 field is not completely observed by sdss . clearly , all gcs produce high peaks in @xmath9 . since @xmath9 is roughly proportional to the number of stars attributed to the population model in the model fit , the objects with the largest numbers of stars produce the strongest detections . only in the plot for pal 14 does the vertical scale allow the random variations in @xmath9 to be visible in the area around the object . the s / n of these detections should be measured with respect to this random noise . using the 216 boxes around the central 9 boxes we obtain an estimate of the rms in @xmath9 from random variations in the cmds . negative values of @xmath9 are suppressed because a negative number of stars in a population is unphysical , which has to be taken into account when calculating the rms . even pal 14 , a rather sparsely populated and distant cluster , is detected with high s / n , as @xmath32 . in summary , section [ sec : gctests ] has illustrated the robustness and precision with which match can interpret high - quality cmds in a variety of circumstances . over the past few years the importance of deep wide - field surveys for the study of the stellar components of the milky way galaxy has been demonstrated by 2mass ( e.g. , * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ) and the sdss . specifically , the sdss has enabled a detailed picture of the galactic stellar halo ( e.g. , * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ) and led to the discovery of at least fourteen previously unknown dwarf galaxies and globulars : ( umai , * ? ? ? * ) , ( wil1 , * ? ? ? * ) , ( cvni , * ? ? ? * ) , ( booi , * ? ? ? * ) , ( umaii , * ? ? ? * ) , , , , , ( com , cvnii , her , leoiv , seg1 , * ? ? ? * ) , @xcite , ( booii , * ? ? ? * ) , and two very low - luminosity globulars and @xcite . while these discoveries are important for our understanding of the so - called `` missing satellite problem '' ( e.g. , * * ; * ? ? ? * ) , these new systems might also shed new light on the mechanisms of star formation in low - mass halos with small baryon content . why these systems were only discovered with sdss data can be explained by their low surface brightness , as shown by @xcite . apart from the promise that more systems of even lower surface brightness might be waiting to be discovered by future generations of deep imaging surveys , this fact raises intriguing questions . do these systems show that star formation can occur under conditions generally considered to be incapable of supporting such activity , or have these systems evolved to their current state through , for example , tidal interactions with the galaxy ? a thorough and systematic study of the properties of these objects is needed to understand their formation and evolution and the possible cosmological implications . several groups have been working on photometric and spectroscopic follow - up of the new mw companions in order to constrain their properties . a compilation of these results is given in table [ tab : newprops ] . although individual measurements of properties might be less precise in some cases , the advantage of studying these objects using the sdss photometry is that this highly uniform dataset allows a systematic approach to the complete set of objects and fair comparisons between them . in the following , we apply our single component ( sc ) fitting techniques to constrain the overall distances , metallicities and ages of the objects listed in table [ tab : newprops ] . we also constrain the sfh of a subset of objects , since the majority contain too few stars to make this a worthwhile exercise . the objects we use are boo , cvn i , and uma i because of their relatively well - populated cmds , and leo t because of its clearly complex star formation history . for all the fits in this section we assume a salpeter - like initial mass function and a binary fraction of 0.5 , similar to the value for disk stars @xcite . lccccc bootes i & 60@xmath336 & [email protected] , [email protected]@xmath15 , [email protected]@xmath16 & @xmath14 - 2 , @xmath14 - 2.5@xmath34 , @xmath14 - 2.1@xmath35 & [email protected] & [email protected] + bootes ii & 60@xmath3310 & [email protected] & @xmath14 - 2 & 4@xmath332 & -3@xmath331 + canes venatici i & 220@xmath3320 & [email protected] & @xmath14 - 2 , -2.5 -1.5@xmath18 , -2.0@xmath35 , -2.09@xmath19 & [email protected] & [email protected] + canes venatici ii & 150@xmath3315 & [email protected] & -2.3@xmath19 & @xmath143.2 & [email protected] + coma berenices & 44@xmath334 & [email protected] & @xmath14 - 2 , -2.00@xmath19 & @xmath145.5 & [email protected] + hercules & 140@xmath3313 & [email protected] & -2.27@xmath19 & @xmath148.2 & [email protected] + leo iv & 160@xmath3315 & [email protected] & -2.3@xmath19 & @xmath143.4 & [email protected] + leo t & @xmath14420 & @xmath1423.1 & @xmath14 - 1.6 , -2.3@xmath19 & @xmath141.4 & @xmath14 - 7.1 + segue 1 & 23@xmath332 & [email protected] & - & @xmath144.5 & [email protected] + ursa major i & @xmath14100 & @xmath1420 & @xmath14 - 2 , -2.2@xmath35 , -2.1@xmath19 & @xmath147.8 & @xmath14 - 6.5 + ursa major ii & 32@xmath335 & [email protected] & @xmath14 - 1.3 , -1.6@xmath35 , -2.0@xmath19 & @xmath1412 & [email protected] + willman 1 & 38@xmath337 & [email protected] & @xmath14 - 1.3 , -1.6@xmath35 & @xmath141.9 & @xmath14 - 2.5 + [ tab : newprops ] as for the gcs we obtained data in 5@xmath115 fields around each object from the sdss cas as outlined in section [ sec : gctests ] . for the target cmds we used the stars within one half - light radius ( @xmath36 , table [ tab : newprops ] ) from the center ( with a minimum of 3 ) , with all stars outside a radius of 60 used for the control cmds . figure [ fig : nscmds ] shows the target cmds for the twelve objects . in all cases except leo t a color range of @xmath27 is used for the cmd fits . the population parameter space we sample consists of 12 age bins , 24 metallicity bins and 31 distance bins . the age bins have a 0.1 log - year width and separations of 0.1 log - year , with the oldest running from 10.110.2 log - years ( 12.5 gyr to 15.8 gyr ) and the youngest from 9.09.1 ( 1 gyr to 1.26 gyr ) . metallicities run from [ fe / h][email protected] to 0.0 in steps of 0.1 dex , and each metallicity bin has a width of 0.2 dex . the range in distance modulus probed is 3 magnitudes wide , with a resolution of 0.1 magnitudes , and is centered on the literature value for each object . for leo t we use a slightly different approach . the group of blue stars in the cmd is too bright and does not have the right morphology to be interpreted as hb stars belonging to the same population as the rgb stars . this means there are two populations present in two different parts of the cmd , with the rgb corresponding to the old population and the stars at @xmath370.3 to a much younger population . as demonstrated in section [ subsec : fakegc ] , in such a case the sc fits will give very poor results . however , since the two populations in leo t are only present on one side of the @xmath38 line , they can be easily separated . thus , to determine the properties of the two populations separately we divide the leo t cmd into a red ( [email protected] ) and a blue ( [email protected] ) part and fit these separately . the red part of the cmd is fit with the same parameter space as the other objects . for the blue part the same metallicities and distance moduli are probed , but a younger set of age bins is used . here we use nine bins , the four oldest of which have a width of 0.1 log - years centered on 9.05 , 9.15 , 9.25 and 9.35 ; the five youngest have a width of 0.2 log - years centered on 8.1 , 8.3 , 8.5 , 8.7 and 8.9 log - years . in figures [ fig : nsscfit1 ] and [ fig : nsscfit2 ] the sc fitting results for the new mw satellites , except leo t , are presented . the right - most panels show the cmd of each object again , with the best - fit sc model overplotted as contours . monte carlo runs were used to determine the values of @xmath8 . except for boo i and cvn i , solid contours are shown for the case of a fixed metallicity or age , where such a measurement is available in the literature . figure [ fig : leotscfit ] shows the same results for the red and blue part of the leo t cmd . the fact that low s / n hinders a robust determination of the population properties provides a serious problem for the majority of the targets . although for most objects a finite region of parameter space lies within 1 @xmath8 from the best fit ( the white area in the contour plots ) , reasonable measurements of any individual parameter can only be obtained for boo i , cvn i , cvn ii , com and her . especially for boo ii , leo iv and leo t , parameters are very poorly constrained , and @xmath7 space shows a complicated morphology with multiple minima . to constrain the sfhs of boo i , cvn i , leo t and uma ii we follow the same approach as before for the gcs . a grid composed of nine age bins and twelve metallicity bins is used , the age bins going from 10.2 to 8.4 log - years with an 0.2 log - year width , and the metallicities from [ fe / h]=-2.4 to 0.0 with a 0.2 dex width . a fit is done at three different distance moduli , 0.1 magnitude apart , with the middle value equal to the literature value . the resulting sfhs and amrs are plotted in figure [ fig : nssfh ] . as with the gcs , we also test our overdensity detection scheme , described in section [ subsec : detect ] , on these new milky way satellites . the 5@xmath115 field centered on each object is divided in a square grid of 225 20@xmath1120 boxes , the cmds of which are fit both with a control field and with the control field plus a single component population model . as the control field the whole 5@xmath115 field is used . for the sc model we consider two cases . first we use a typical old population model , with age range 10.0 to 10.1 log - year and [ fe / h]@xmath40 at the best - fit distance obtained with the sc fits from section [ subsec : nsscfits ] . second we use a model corresponding to the best - fit properties obtained for each object . the former case serves to simulate a realistic search of all sdss data for unknown stellar overdensities . when performing such a search , an old , metal - poor model would be a likely choice since most mw satellites are dominated by such populations . another factor that would influence the results of a search for unknown stellar overdensities is the size of the box used . as a test , we also did the same exercise using different box sizes for boo i. in addition to the 20@xmath1120 boxes , we also used 40@xmath1140 boxes and 1@xmath111boxes . to enable the use of these coarser grids , we retrieved a larger , 10@xmath1110 field from the sdss dr5 archive centered on boo i. in figure [ fig : nsarea ] we present the results of the fits with the fine - tuned stellar population models to the twelve objects . each panel shows the improvement in the goodness - of - fit , @xmath41 , as function of the position in the field centered on a satellite . figure [ fig : booiareas ] shows the resulting @xmath41 for the three different box sizes in a 10@xmath1110 field centered on boo i. the significances of all detections , expressed in @xmath42 , are listed in table [ tab : detsig ] . lcc boo i@xmath15 & 106.9 & 121.6 , 58.2 , 27.8 + boo ii & 0.86 & 0.93 + cvn i & 447.7 & 589.4 + cvn ii & 2.61 & 13.3 + com & 57.5 & 53.9 + her & 15.2 & 28.2 + leo iv & 13.8 & 38.2 + leo t & 5.8 & 11.3 + seg 1 & 9.9 & 7.8 + uma i & 12.9 & 11.2 + uma ii & 1156.2 & 865.3 + wil 1 & 48.8 & 47.8 + [ tab : detsig ] we have performed a systematic and uniform numerical cmd analysis of the recently discovered mw satellites . how well the properties of an individual object can be determined depends on the number of member stars present in the cmd and the observed cmd features . for some objects , this type of analysis is hard - pressed to provide strong statistical constraints due to the sparseness of their cmds . in table [ tab : newresults ] we summarize the results of our single component and star formation history fits . the distance moduli , metallicities and ages listed are the unweighted averages of all sc fits that lie within 1 @xmath8 of the best sc fit and are therefore considered to be acceptable fits . the errors are the standard deviations of the parameter values of these fits , combined with an added systematic uncertainty of 0.1 dex in [ fe / h ] and 0.1 mag in distance modulus to account for isochrone uncertainties . in cases where these properties can not be sufficiently constrained we list the metallicities and ages we get when assuming the distance modulus from the literature , as this is usually the best - determined property . the star formation history results , where available , are summarized in table [ tab : newresults ] by the main star formation episodes . below follows an object - by - object discussion of these and the star formation history results . _ boo i._ this dwarf spheroidal is relatively nearby at @xmath1460 kpc and an rgb , hb and msto are all present in the sdss data , albeit sparsely sampled . the overall properties can therefore be determined with relatively good accuracy , and the star formation history is the best - constrained of all . especially the distance of boo i is very well constrained thanks to the hb which is detected at high s / n due to the absence of field stars at @xmath430 . the msto and slope of the rgb provide constraints on the age and metallicity , respectively . our distance , metallicity and age measurements agree very well with the findings of other authors based on spectroscopy and deeper imaging data . the star formation history shows one significant epoch of star formation in the oldest ( @xmath44 gyr ) bin , with no other bins containing a significant sfr . considering the ability of these fits to distinguish between a single and a multiple component system , demonstrated by the fits to the artificial cmds in section [ subsec : fakegc ] , we conclude , despite the sparseness of the cmd , that boo i very probably only contains old stars . thus , our results are consistent with the picture of a purely old , metal - poor stellar population . _ boo ii._ the number of boo ii member stars in the sdss data is very small and traces only the rgb . unfortunately , the resulting very low s / n combined with the degeneracies between the different parameters make it impossible for match to constrain the stellar population parameters in a statistically significant way . although @xcite show that the sdss cmd of boo ii is _ consistent _ with boo ii having similar metallicity , age , and distance as boo i , the sdss data alone do not support any significant constraints on any of these properties . the only way to get such constraints is by obtaining deeper follow - up data . _ cvn i._ being the brightest of the twelve objects analyzed here , cvn i has a well - populated rgb and hb . this helps to increase the robustness of the constraints we obtain from the sc fits . although at the edge of the sensitivity limits of sdss , the hb enables the determination of the distance . moreover , the extent of the hb to very blue colors requires the stars in cvn i to be both old and metal - poor . this constraint on the metallicity is further enhanced by the slope of the rgb . together , the extended hb and rgb thus can provide robust constraints on the properties of the dominant stellar population . the distance modulus we find is slightly smaller than that found in the literature , but not significantly so . the metallicity of [ fe / h][email protected] falls nicely within the range of metallicities observed by @xcite . although an age of 14@xmath332 gyr fits the cmd best , the star formation history shows two peaks . the oldest star forming episode in the 10 - 16 gyr bin is dominant in terms of the number of stars and drives the sc fits , but the peak in the 2.5 - 4 gyr bin is equally significant . for the old stars the metallicity is found to be close to [ fe / h]=-2 , while the younger stars have metallicities around [ fe / h]=-1.5 . it should be noted that the young population found here is not caused by the algorithm attempting to fit bhb stars , as is the case for m15 in figure [ fig : gcsfh ] . stars belonging to this young population only appear in the regions of the cmd where the rgb and the red part of the hb are located . the presence of two populations is therefore purely based on the rgb morphology and the density of stars along the hb . this detection of an old and intermediate age population with these metallicities confirms the findings of @xcite and @xcite . furthermore , @xcite note the presence of a carbon star very close to the center of cvn i and its heliocentric radial velocity of 36@xmath3320 km / s is consistent with the radial velocities that @xcite and @xcite measure for cvn i , making it is likely that this star belongs to the cvn i dwarf . since carbon stars are often of intermediate age , this is another indication of the presence of an intermediate age population in this system . _ cvn ii._ although very faint and distant , our distance measurement for cvn ii is very accurate and in very good agreement with the value from @xcite due to the presence of hb stars . from the extension of the hb to very blue colors ( @xmath45 ) we can infer that the stellar population is both old and metal - poor . despite the sparseness of the cmd we thus get relatively good constraints on these parameters and we find a metallicity of [ fe / h]@xmath14 - 2 and a very high age . cvn ii thus appears to be a very old and metal - poor object . _ com._ an absence of a clear hb makes constraining the distance of com difficult and leads to a strong degeneracy between age , distance and metallicity . similar degeneracies occur for artificial cmd 1 in section [ subsec : fakegc ] and the gc ngc 6229 ( see figures [ fig : fakescfit ] and [ fig : gcsfh ] ) , even though their cmds are much less sparsely populated . the rgb and msto alone do not allow a robust determination of the individual population parameters . as a consequence , the distance modulus we recover has rather large error bars but is consistent with the findings of @xcite . the sc fits favor an ancient population ( @xmath44 gyr ) and a metallicity of [ fe / h]@xmath312 , but also here the uncertainties are large . _ her._ in the case of her the contamination of the cmd with fore- and background stars is severe , which is due to its location at lower galactic latitudes compared to the other objects . this high contamination means a low s / n of the cmd features of her , apart from the hb , which is in the relatively clean part of the cmd at @xmath46 . our distance modulus of [email protected] , which largely is determined by the hb , is somewhat lower than estimated by @xcite , but is consistent within the error bars . this object too is consistent with an ancient and metal - poor ( [ fe / h]@xmath14 - 2 ) stellar population . even though the region of parameter space that lies within 1 @xmath8 of the best fit values is well constrained , the complete parameter space lies within 2 @xmath8 , which is due to the low s / n of the cmd . these results based only on sdss data are also consistent with the results obtained by applying the same methods to much deeper @xmath47 photometry from the large binocular telescope @xcite . in fact , the uncertainties on the values of distance , metallicity and age from the deeper data are very similar to the 1@xmath8 values we obtain here . lcccr bootes i ( booi ) & [email protected] & [email protected] & 14@xmath332 & @xmath1410 - 16 gyr + bootes ii ( booii ) & - & - & - & - + canes venatici i ( cvni ) & [email protected] & [email protected] & 14@xmath332 & @xmath142 - 4 gyr , @xmath1410 - 16 gyr + canes venatici ii ( cvnii ) & [email protected] & [email protected] & 14@xmath332 & - + coma berenices ( com ) & [email protected] & -1.9@xmath48 & 11@xmath49 & - + hercules ( her ) & [email protected] & [email protected] & 14@xmath333 & - + leo iv ( leoiv ) & - & _ [email protected] _ & _ 14@xmath332 _ & - + leo t ( leot ) & [email protected] & [email protected] & - & @xmath50 gyr , @xmath146 - 10 gyr + segue 1 ( seg1 ) & - & _ [email protected] _ & _ 11@xmath334 _ & - + ursa major i ( umai ) & - & _ [email protected] _ & _ 10@xmath335 _ & - + ursa major ii ( umaii ) & - & _ [email protected] _ & _ 11@xmath334 _ & @xmath142 - 6 gyr , @xmath1410 - 16 gyr + willman 1 ( wil1 ) & [email protected] & [email protected] & 10@xmath335 & - + [ tab : newresults ] _ leo iv._ the cmd of leo iv is so sparse that a statistically significant determination of the population properties is not possible based on the sc fits alone . the best fit is given by a population of @xmath1414 gyr old stars with [ fe / h][email protected] at a distance modulus of 20.8 , but a large number of models gives a goodness - of - fit that is only marginally worse . assuming a distance modulus of 21.0 @xcite , gives the solid contours in the age - metallicity panel for leo iv in figure [ fig : nsscfit2 ] . using this prior , the sc fits allow the age and metallicity to be constrained to 14@xmath332 gyr and [ fe / h]@xmath132.1 @xmath330.3 , respectively . _ leo t._ this object is very interesting and differs from the others analyzed here , in that it is the least luminous system known which shows signs of on - going star formation and has hi gas associated with it @xcite . because of the presence of two clearly very different populations the sc fitting method is not very well suited . even when fitting the two populations separately , by dividing the cmd in two distinct parts as we have done , the results are poor , due to the small numbers of stars in each part . taking the results of the two populations together we find a distance modulus of [email protected] magnitudes . both the old and young populations are best fit with low metallicities , [ fe / h]@xmath51 - 1.5 . the star formation history we find ( figure [ fig : nssfh ] ) clearly shows two peaks , confirming the presence of two distinct populations . the age of the old population , not well - constrained with the sc fits , is put in the 6.5 - 10 gyr age bin . comparing this with the sfhs of the gcs in figure [ fig : gcsfh ] and the other sfhs in figure [ fig : nssfh ] , where in all cases the peak of star formation is in the oldest age bin , this implies that the old population in leo t is on average younger than the old population in these other objects . the young stars are clearly found in the three youngest age bins , where they are fit as young ( @xmath50 gyr ) blue loop stars . @xcite interpreted the nature of these stars similarly . _ seg1._ in seg 1 only a ms and msto are populated in the very sparse cmd . as with the artificial cmd 1 in section [ subsec : fakegc ] and the gcs m13 , m15 and m92 , where the sc fits also solely relie on the ms and msto , strong degeneracies between age , distance and metallicity are expected . indeed , the contour plots for seg 1 in figure [ fig : nsscfit2 ] show a similar morphology , but due to the sparseness of the cmd with even poorer constraints . this makes any determination of the population properties of seg 1 , based solely on the sc fits , impossible . even when using the distance modulus from @xcite as a prior , the age - metallicity degeneracy prevents strong constraints on these parameters , resulting in very large error bars on the values for seg 1 listed in table [ tab : newresults ] . _ uma i._ this object also has a very sparsely populated cmd . an rgb is readily seen , with some probable hb stars that , however , are too few to produce strong statistical constraints on the distance . because of this and the usual degeneracies , the significance of the sc fit results is very low , causing all parameters to be poorly constrained . assuming a distance modulus of 20 @xcite , our results are consistent with an old ( @xmath1410 gyr ) and metal - poor population , but with large error bars . _ uma ii._ although the msto of uma ii is well - populated , the scarcity of stars in other parts of the cmd provides problems for this object . there are some rc stars , but the s / n of this cmd feature is not high enough to make for a reliable distance determination . added to that there are strong degeneracies between the different solutions ; similar degeneracies are seen in section [ sec : gctests ] for the gc ngc 6229 where also the msto drives the sc fit results . our results are , however , consistent with previous findings . with a prior on the distance modulus , @xmath5217.5 , the fits agree with the conclusion of @xcite that uma ii is not very metal - poor , but seems to have a more intermediate metallicity of [ fe / h]@xmath531.5 , although the error bars are large ( see table [ tab : newresults ] ) . the spectroscopic metallicity measurement from @xcite is consistent with our value , but the one from @xcite is more metal - poor , but still consistent within the errors . while the sc fits imply that the majority of stars is likely old , @xmath1411 gyr , the sfh ( figure [ fig : nssfh ] ) hints at more complexity . according to the sfh results , there is a population of very old ( @xmath3010 gyr ) and metal - poor ( [ fe / h]@xmath54 - 2 ) , as well as a younger ( @xmath145 gyr ) , close to solar metallicity population . since the sc fits measure the average properties , this is consistent with the intermediate metallicity we find there . @xcite report that the upper main sequence of uma ii in their deeper subaru data is wider than expected just from observational errors , one explanation for which could be the presence of a mix of populations . also in our fit , the double peak results from the width of the msto , which is less well - fit by a single - age population . the exact ages and metallicities of the populations should be studied with deeper and spectroscopic data , since the sdss cmd does not support such detailed conclusions . however , taking our sfh fit and these other results together it does seem likely that uma ii , like cvn i , is a system with a complex star formation history , which might also be ( part of ) the explanation for the discrepancy between the two available spectroscopic metallicity measurements . _ wil1._ for this system only the msto is observed , which is also sparsely populated . this leads to a strongly degenerate solution space , similar to the cases of uma ii and seg 1 . the distance can be determined slightly better here , but the range of distance moduli for which fits within 1@xmath8 from the best fit can be obtained is still very large : [email protected] . using the distance modulus from @xcite ( m - m=17.9 ) as a prior , the fit results imply an old population ( @xmath1410 gyr ) with an intermediate to low metallicity ( [ fe / h]@xmath14 - 1.6 ) , but also here the error bars on these numbers are large . figure [ fig : nssummary ] summarizes our results from the match fits to the cmds for the sample of new milky way satellites . in the left panel we plot our metallicity estimates for all objects versus their absolute magnitudes , together with the spectroscopic metallicities from @xcite and @xcite . especially for the fainter objects our metallicity estimates are very poorly constrained ( figures [ fig : nsscfit1 ] and [ fig : nsscfit2 ] ) and because of the available isochrones our metallicity range is restricted to [ fe / h]@xmath132.4 at the metal - poor end . in light of this , our photometric results agree remarkably well with the spectroscopic values . still , care has to be taken when drawing conclusions from these metallicity estimates . we can say at best that we find no indication for a corellation between metallicity and the luminosity of the objects , which is observed for brighter dwarf spheroidals ( e.g. , * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? the mean age of the stars versus absolute magnitude is shown in the middle panel of figure [ fig : nssummary ] . for objects in which the sfh fits showed evidence for two populations , both populations are plotted separately . the right panel shows the inferred ages of the satellites versus distance modulus , to probe possible environmental influences . looking at the middle panel of figure [ fig : nssummary ] there is no clear evidence for a luminosity dependence of the ability of a dwarf galaxy to form stars recently . although the two most luminous objects in this sample , leo t and cvn i , both have young or intermediate age populations , the much fainter uma ii does as well . while the environment might play a role , the right panel of figure [ fig : nssummary ] shows no obvious relation between age or the presence of multiple star formation epochs with distance from the sun ( since these objects are at high galactic latitude and at large distances , the heliocentric and galactocentric distances are not significantly different ) . this is contrary to the trend suggested by @xcite for the brighter local group dwarf spheroidals , in which systems with a larger fraction of young or intermediate age stars are systematically more distant . since most of these recently detected objects are intrinsically faint and/or distant , they are of course much harder to detect by any overdensity detection scheme than the gcs . the improvement in the goodness - of - fit , @xmath41 , between a fit with a control field only and a control field plus sc model is roughly proportional to the number of stars in the cmd that can be fit by the sc model . this means that the objects with sparsely populated cmds are the most difficult to detect . comparing the overdensity detection results in figure [ fig : nsarea ] with the cmds of the objects ( figure [ fig : nscmds ] ) confirms this , as boo , cvn i and uma ii give by far the highest @xmath41 . similarly , the rms noise in @xmath41 increases with increasing numbers of field stars in the cmds , and at the low s / n end the noise level starts to play an important role . for example , comparing the panels for boo ii and cvn ii in figure [ fig : nsarea ] , which have the same @xmath41 scale , reveals very different noise levels . this can be traced back to the positions of these objects on the sky , with bootes ii lying behind the sagittarius stream and cvn ii in a much ` cleaner ' region of the halo . the sagittarius stream also produces a high noise level around segue 1 . while most objects produce clear peaks in @xmath41 , the detectability of several is rather low . for example , cvn ii , leo t , segue 1 and uma i have a @xmath41 only a factor of a few higher than the most prominent noise peaks ; boo ii is not clearly detected at all . when inspecting the values in table [ tab : detsig ] , it turns out that the use of a fine - tuned population model as compared to the generic old , metal - poor model has a varied effect . in some cases the detection significance is improved , in some cases the change has little effect and in a few cases the detectability is actually decreased . in these last cases , even though the peak @xmath41 is the same to or higher for the fine - tuned model , the change in the rms causes the detection to become less significant . this indicates that , while sampling a range of population models would be preferable when doing an overdensity search , a relatively small grid of models will not severely compromise the outcome . to test the significance of the @xmath42 measure , we tested the overdensity detection scheme on a presumably ` empty ' patch of sdss sky with 170@xmath56ra@xmath56200and 40@xmath56dec@xmath5665 . this patch of sky was divided into 20@xmath1120 boxes with some overlap , giving a total of 7088 boxes , equalling an effective search area of almost 800 square degrees . a control field ( the cmd from the surounding 5@xmath115area ) was fit to the cmd of each box , as well as this control field plus a typical old stellar population model with an age bin of 10.0 to 10.1 log - year and [ fe / h]=-2 . this was done seven times , with the stellar population model shifted to different distance moduli : 17.0 , 18.0 , 19.0 , 20.0 , 21.0 , 22.0 and 23.0 magnitudes . thus , for each box seven values of @xmath42 are obtained , where the rms is obtained from the boxes in the surounding 5@xmath115 . the methodology closely resembles the approach used for the mw satellites . figure [ fig : pksig ] shows the histogram of all @xmath42 values for all boxes ( solid line ) , as well as for two individual distance moduli , 18.0 ( dotted ) and 22.0 ( dashed ) mag . all three histograms show the same distribution , implying that the noise behaves similarly for all distance moduli . the tail of the distribution extends to @xmath57 . an inspection of the locations with values higher than 7 reveals no obvious overdensities , implying that this tail is indeed caused by noise . in order to obtain a clean sample of stellar overdensity detections , a @xmath42 threshold of @xmath149 seems appropriate . this means that when using a sufficiently sampled grid of population models and distances , all new mw satellites would be detected , with the exception of boo ii ( cf . table [ tab : detsig ] ) . the results of the fits to boo i with different box sizes , listed in table [ tab : detsig ] and shown in figure [ fig : booiareas ] , illustrate the effect of the spatial resolution of the cmd grid . here , the detectability is also strongly affected by the rms of the background noise . since the @xmath41 due to random variations in the field population increases with increasing numbers of field stars , the rms is higher for larger box sizes , favoring the smallest boxes used here . the fact that the @xmath58 decreases roughly by a factor of 2 as we move to larger box sizes is caused by the number of background stars increasing by a factor 4 , while the number of boo i stars in the central box does not change . it is also interesting to note that here the noise is dominated by the sagittarius stream , which runs accross the lower left corner of the panels in figure [ fig : booiareas ] . the significance of the detections in table [ tab : detsig ] can be boosted by decreasing the box sizes , especially for the objects with the smallest ( projected ) size . we have shown that application of match @xcite to hess diagrams or cmds of sdss data successfully recovers the known stellar population properties of globular clusters ( section [ sec : gctests ] ) , within the limitations of the data . this gives confidence that despite inaccuracies in the theoretical isochrones in isolated parts of the cmd , the overall cmd - fitting technique still provides good and trustworthy results . apart from the standard star formation history fitting method , we have also demonstrated three other ways of applying match to sdss data : + 1 ) identifying the best fitting ` single component ' stellar population , a mode useful for cmds of very faint or distant objects with limited s / n in their cmd ; + 2 ) fitting the line - of - sight distribution of stars to keep the fit s degrees of freedom constant , we fix the metallicity at each age bin ; and + 3 ) algorithmic detection of objects , i.e. of a localized stellar population overdensity in a particular ( unknown ) direction and at a particular ( unknown ) distance . this is done by comparing the difference in the goodness - of - fit between a cmd - fit to a control field and a cmd - fit to a control field plus model population . these tests show that the application of cmd - fitting techniques to wide - field survey data is a very promising endeavor in the light of sdss and other surveys that will start yielding data over the next few years . further improvements in software and theoretical isochrones can only increase the use and accuracy of such work . on the basis of these tests and the application to known globular clusters , we have applied our single component fitting technique to twelve recently discovered milky way satellites . the sparseness of several of the cmds of these objects inhibits a robust determination of the population parameters and the best fit solutions are often not unique . in order to obtain good constraints at least some cmd features such as the msto , hb and rgb should be observed with sufficiently high s / n . for the least luminous objects this is inherently problematic because of their lack of ( evolved ) stars . for only four of the satellites , the cmds had sufficiently high s / n to warrant a star formation history fit . the results of the population fits to the new milky way satellites , summarized in table [ tab : newresults ] , are consistent with the individual discovery and follow - up studies . when looking at the sample as a whole , we find that the majority of these objects are likely dominated by old ( @xmath59 10 gyr ) and metal - poor ( [ fe / h]@xmath14 - 2 ) stellar populations . for boo , cvn ii , com , and her the single component fits converge to this picture , and for boo the full fit of a star formation history also confirms this . seg 1 , uma i , uma ii , and wil 1 are not well constrained by the sc fits , but using the distances from the literature as priors , they are also consistent with similar ages and metallicities , although slightly higher metallicities ( [ fe / h]@xmath311.6 ) can not be excluded . the single component fits show cvn i to be old as well , but not extremely metal - poor . however , the sfh reveals the presence of both an old , metal - poor , as well as a younger ( @xmath513 gyr ) and more metal - rich population . this is consistent with the findings of @xcite , who detect two kinematically distinct populations in cvn i which differ in age and metallicity , and the detection of a young component by @xcite in deeper photometry . the sfh of uma ii also shows a peak at an age of @xmath145 gyr , which supports suggestion of multiple populations in this object by @xcite , who find the msto width of uma ii to be too large to be explained by photometric errors alone . finally , in leo t the presence of two distinct populations is readily seen in the cmd and reproduced in the star formation history . the rgb seen in this system belongs most likely to an intermediate age ( @xmath145 - 10 gyr ) population with a metallicity of [ fe / h]@xmath14 - 1.5 to -2 , while the blue stars in the cmd are most likely very young ( @xmath561 gyr ) blue loop stars with similar metallicities . the objects studied here are all intrinsically faint and sparse , and in some cases the population parameters can be constrained only poorly . however , their star formation histories do not appear uniform , nor do all of them appear to be exclusively old and metal poor . we thank matthew coleman for helpful discussions and the anonymous referee for his useful comments that helped to clarify this paper . j.t.a.d.j . acknowledges support from dfg priority program 1177 . d.b.z . was supported by a pparc - funded rolling grant position . thanks the deutsche forschungsgemeinschaft for their support through the emmy noether program . v.b . was supported by a pparc fellowship . funding for the sdss and sdss - ii has been provided by the alfred p. sloan foundation , the participating institutions , the national science foundation , the u.s . department of energy , the national aeronautics and space administration , the japanese monbukagakusho , the max planck society , and the higher education funding council for england . the sdss web site is http://www.sdss.org/. the sdss is managed by the astrophysical research consortium for the participating institutions . the participating institutions are the american museum of natural history , astrophysical institute potsdam , university of basel , university of cambridge , case western reserve university , university of chicago , drexel university , fermilab , the institute for advanced study , the japan participation group , johns hopkins university , the joint institute for nuclear astrophysics , the kavli institute for particle astrophysics and cosmology , the korean scientist group , the chinese academy of sciences ( lamost ) , los alamos national laboratory , the max - planck - institute for astronomy ( mpia ) , the max - planck - institute for astrophysics ( mpa ) , new mexico state university , ohio state university , university of pittsburgh , university of portsmouth , princeton university , the united states naval observatory , and the university of washington . aparicio , a. , gallart , c. & bertelli , g. 1997 , , 114 , 680 , j. , catelan , m. , ferraro , f. r. , spassova , n. , buonanno , r. , iannicola , g. , richtler , t. , & sweigart , a. v. 1999 , , 343 , 813 clem , j. l. 2006 , phd th . , univ . of victoria dallora , m. , et al . 2006 , , 653 , l109 de jong , j. t. a. , butler , d. j. , rix , h - w . , dolphin , & a. e. , martnez - delgado , d. 2007 , , accepted , astro - ph/0701140 dolphin , a. e. 1997 . , 2 , 397 dolphin , a. e. 2001 , , 332 , 91 duquennoy , a. & mayor , m. 1991 , , 248 , 485 fukugita , m. , ichikawa , t. , gunn , j. e. , doi , m. , shimasaku , k. , & schneider , d. p. 1996 , , 111 , 1748 gallart , c. , aparicio , a. , bertelli , g. , & chiosi , c. 1996 , , 112 , 1950 , l. , bertelli , g. , bressan , a. , chiosi , c. , groenewegen , m. a. t. , marigo , p. , salasnich , b. , & weiss , a. 2002 , , 391 , 195 girardi , l. , grebel , e. k. , odenkirchen , m. , & chiosi , c. 2004 , , 422 , 205 gunn , j.e . 1998 , , 116 , 3040 gunn , j.e . 2006 , , 131 , 2332 harris , w. e. 1996 , , 112 , 1487 harris , w. e. , et al . 1997 , , 114 , 1030 harris , j. & zaritsky , d. 2001 , , 136 , 25 hernandez , x. , gilmore , g. & valls - gabaud , d. 2000 , , 317 , 831 hogg , d.w . , finkbeiner , d.p . , schlegel , d.j . , & gunn , j.e . 2001 , aj , 122 , 2129 holtzman , j. a. et al . 1999 , , 118 , 2262 ibata , r. a. , chapman , s. , irwin , m. j. lewis , g. , & martin , n. f. 2006 , , 373 , l70 ivezi , . 2004 , an , 325 , 583 kroupa , p. , tout , c. a. & gilmore , g. 1993 , , 262 , 545 lupton , r. , gunn , j. , & szalay , a. 1999 , , 118 , 1406 muoz , r. r , carlin , j. l. , frinchaboy , p. m. , nidever , d. l. , majewski , s. r. , & patterson , r. j. 2006 , , 650 , l51 olsen , k. a. g. 1999 , , 117 , 2244 sarajedini , a. 1997 , , 113 , 682 schlegel , d. , finkbeiner , d. & davis , m. 1998 , , 500 , 525 smith , j. a. , et al . 2002 , , 123 , 2121 stoughton , c. et al . 2002 , aj , 123 , 485 tolstoy , e. & saha , a. 1996 , , 462 , 672 york , et al . , 2000 , , 120 , 1579 Abstract:

Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.

Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered . Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video . Paper: causality is a topic which nowadays receives much attention . statisticians , epidemiologists , biostatisticians , social scientists , computer [ especially those in artificial intelligence , see , e.g. , @xcite ( @xcite ) ] , econometricians and philosophers are investigating questions like `` what would have happened if '' and `` what would happen if . '' this article discusses estimating the effect of a time - varying treatment . as a recurring example , this article focuses on the effect of a medical treatment which is adapted to a patient s state during the course of time . large observational studies have become widely used in medical research when data from randomized experiments are not available . randomized clinical trials are often expensive , impractical , and sometimes unfeasible for ethical reasons because treatment is withheld from some patients regardless of medical considerations . also , in some instances , exploratory investigations using nonexperimental data are used before conducting a randomized trial . in observational studies there is no pre - specified treatment protocol . data are collected on patient characteristics and treatments in the course of the normal interaction between patients and doctors . obviously , it is considerably more difficult to draw correct causal conclusions from observational data than from a randomized experiment . the main reason is the so - called confounding by indication or selection bias . for example , doctors may prescribe more medication to patients who are relatively unhealthy . thus , association between medication dose and health outcomes may arise not only from the treatment effect but also from the way the treatment was assigned . if this confounding by indication only takes place at the start of the treatment , one can condition on initial patient characteristics or covariates , such as blood pressure or number of white blood cells , in order to remove the effect of the confounding , and get meaningful estimates of the treatment effect . linear regression , logistic regression or cox regression can be used for this purpose . however , estimating treatment effects is more difficult if treatment decisions after the start of the treatment are adapted to the state of the patients in subsequent periods . treatment might be influenced by a patient s state in the past , which was influenced by treatment decisions before ; thus , simply conditioning on a patient s state in the past means disregarding information on the effect of past treatment . in such a case , even the well - known time - dependent cox model does not answer the question of whether , or how , treatment affects the outcome of interest . the time - dependent cox model studies the rate at which some event of interest happens ( e.g. , the patient dying ) , given past treatment- and covariate history . however , under time - dependent confounding , past covariate values may have been influenced by previous treatment . the net effect of treatment can thus not be derived from just this rate ; see , for example , @xcite , @xcite or @xcite . structural nested models , proposed in @xcite , lok , gill , van der vaart and robins ( @xcite ) and robins ( @xcite ) to solve practical problems in epidemiology and biostatistics , effectively overcome these difficulties and estimate the effect of time - varying treatments . the main assumption underlying these models is that all information the doctors used to make treatment decisions , and which is predictive of the patient s prognosis with respect to the final outcome , is available for analysis . this assumption of `` no unmeasured confounding '' makes it possible to distinguish between treatment effect and selection bias . what data have to be collected to satisfy this assumption of no unmeasured confounding is for subject matter experts to decide . all of the past treatment- and covariate information which both ( i ) influences a doctor s treatment decisions and ( ii ) is relevant for a patient s prognosis with respect to the outcome of interest , has to be recorded . in section 5 of @xcite and in section 8.1 of robins , rotnitzky and scharfstein ( @xcite ) , a sensitivity analysis methodology for estimation of structural nested models is developed that does not assume no unmeasured confounders . beyond treatment and covariates , the data requirements also include the measure of an outcome of interest ; for example , survival time , time to clinical aids or cd4 count after the treatment period . lok et al . ( @xcite ) study structural nested models in discrete time . these models assume that changes in the values of the covariates and treatment decisions take place at finitely many deterministic times , which are the same for all patients and known in advance . lok et al . ( @xcite ) also assume that covariates and treatment take values in a discrete space . they indicate why it is reasonable to expect consistency and asymptotic normality in discrete time , and they refer to @xcite for the proofs . @xcite generalize lok et al . ( @xcite ) to covariates and treatment taking values in @xmath0 . in this article we consider structural nested models in continuous time , proposed in robins ( @xcite ) . structural nested models in continuous time allow for both changes in the values of the covariates and treatment decisions to take place at arbitrary times for different patients . as noted in @xcite , structural nested models in continuous time assume that a short duration of treatment has only a small effect on the distribution of the outcome of interest . the effect of the treatment on an individual patient may be large , but then the probability of such effect has to be small for any particular short duration of treatment ( see page 7 , bottom ) . this article provides a conceptual framework and mathematical formalization of these practical methods , solving important outstanding problems and contributing to the causality discussion , especially for the time ordered and continuous time case . in particular , this article proves the conjectures in @xcite that structural nested models in continuous time lead to estimators which are both consistent and asymptotically normal . the proof simplifies considerably for structural nested models in discrete time ( see our discussion , section [ discu ] ) . this article also proves that a test related to the score test can be used to investigate whether treatment affects the outcome of interest without specifying a model for the treatment effect . the setting to which structural nested models in continuous time apply is as follows . the outcome of interest , from now on called @xmath1 , is a continuous real variable . for example , the survival time of a patient , time to clinical aids , or cd4 count after the treatment period . we wish to estimate the effect of treatment on the outcome @xmath1 . there is some fixed time interval @xmath2 $ ] , with @xmath3 a finite time , during which treatment and patient characteristics are observed for each patient . we suppose that after time @xmath3 treatment is stopped or switched to some kind of baseline treatment . in this article we assume that there is no censoring , and that the outcome @xmath1 is observed for every patient in the study . see , for example , @xcite , hernn et al . ( @xcite ) and @xcite for ideas about dealing with censoring . we denote the probability space by @xmath4 . the covariate process describes the course of the patient characteristics , for example , the course of the blood pressure and the white blood cell count . we assume that a realization of this covariate process is a function from @xmath2 $ ] to @xmath5 , and that such a _ sample path _ is continuous from the right with limits from the left ( cadlag ) . the covariates which _ must _ be included are those which both ( i ) influence a doctor s treatment decisions _ and _ ( ii ) possibly predict a patient s prognosis with respect to the outcome of interest . if such covariates would not be observed , the assumption of no unmeasured confounding , mentioned in the introduction , will not hold . for the moment consider one single patient . we write @xmath6 for the covariate- _ and _ treatment values at time @xmath7 . we assume that @xmath6 takes values in @xmath8 , and that @xmath9 is measurable for each @xmath10 $ ] . moreover , we assume that @xmath11 , seen as a function on @xmath2 $ ] , is cadlag . we write @xmath12 for the covariate- and treatment history until time @xmath7 , and @xmath13 for the space of cadlag functions from @xmath14 $ ] to @xmath8 in which @xmath15 takes it values . similarly , we write @xmath16 for the whole covariate- and treatment history of the patient on the interval @xmath2 $ ] , and @xmath17 for the space in which @xmath16 takes its values . in this article we choose the projection @xmath18-algebra as the @xmath18-algebra on @xmath13 and @xmath17 ; measurability of @xmath19 for each @xmath20 is then equivalent with measurability of the random variable @xmath15 . for technical reasons , we include in @xmath11 a counter of the number of jump times of the measured treatment- and covariate process . we suppose that observations on different patients are independent . structural nested models are models for relations between so - called counterfactuals . consider for a moment just one patient . in reality this patient received a certain treatment and had final outcome @xmath1 . if his or her actual treatment had been stopped at time t , the patient s final outcome would possibly have been different . the outcome he or she would have had in that case we call @xmath21 . of course , @xmath21 is generally not observed , because the patient s actual treatment after @xmath7 is usually different from no treatment ; it is a counterfactual outcome . instead of stopping treatment , one can also consider switching to some kind of baseline treatment , for example , standard treatment . figure [ figuur1 ] illustrates the nature of counterfactual outcomes . we suppose that all counterfactual outcomes @xmath21 , for @xmath10 $ ] and for all patients , are random variables on the probability space @xmath4 . to formalize the assumption of no unmeasured confounding , consider the history of a particular patient . decisions of the doctors at time @xmath7 may be based , in part , on recorded information on the state of the patient and treatment before @xmath7 , that is , on @xmath22 , but not on other features predicting the outcome of the patient . in particular , given @xmath23 , changes of treatment at time @xmath7 should be independent of @xmath21 , the outcome of the patient in case he or she would not have been treated after time @xmath7 , given @xmath23 . note that @xmath21 is an indication of the prognosis of the patient which does not depend on treatment decisions at or after time @xmath7 , since it is the counterfactual outcome which we would have observed if treatment would have been stopped at time @xmath7 . only if treatment would have no effect , the observed outcome @xmath1 could play this role . this is why robins assumption of no unmeasured confounding demands the independence , given @xmath23 , of treatment decisions at time @xmath7 and @xmath21 . similar conditions , though without time - dependence , can be found in , for example , @xcite . the statement `` changes of treatment at @xmath7 should be independent of @xmath21 , the outcome of the patient in case he or she would not have been treated after time @xmath7 , given @xmath23 '' is not a formal statement : it includes conditioning of null events ( since the probability that treatment changes at @xmath7 may be @xmath24 for every fixed @xmath7 ) on null events ( @xmath23 ) . to overcome this difficulty , we assume that the treatment process can be represented by or generates a ( possibly multivariate ) counting process @xmath25 . for instance , @xmath26 registers the number of treatment changes until time @xmath7 and/or the number of times treatment reached a certain level until time @xmath7 . a counting process constructed this way may serve as @xmath25 in the following . more about counting processes can be found in , for example , andersen et al . ( @xcite ) . we assume that the treatment process @xmath25 has an intensity process . formally , such an intensity process @xmath27 is a predictable process such that @xmath28 is a martingale . the intensity @xmath27 with respect to @xmath29 can be interpreted as the rate at which the counting process @xmath25 jumps given the past treatment- and covariate history @xmath23 . [ int ] @xmath25 has an intensity process @xmath27 on @xmath2 $ ] with respect to the filtration @xmath29 . this intensity process satisfies the following regularity conditions : @xmath30 is bounded by a constant which does not depend on @xmath31 , @xmath27 is continuous from the left . according to this assumption , @xmath32 is a martingale on @xmath2 $ ] with respect to the filtration @xmath29 . since most counting process martingale theory deals with filtrations @xmath33 which satisfy the usual conditions ( @xmath34 contains all null sets and @xmath35 ) , we mention that , under , @xmath36 is also a martingale with respect to @xmath37 , the usual augmentation of @xmath29 . this follows from lemma 67.10 in @xcite , since @xmath38 is cadlag . often , @xmath25 will be chosen to count the number of events of a certain type concerning the treatment process ( e.g. , the number of times treatment changed ) . at @xmath3 , the time the study ends , treatment is stopped or switched to baseline treatment , so a natural choice of @xmath25 will often jump at @xmath3 with positive probability . however , jumps of @xmath25 at @xmath3 are not useful for estimation , and we wish to avoid modeling jumps of @xmath25 at @xmath3 . therefore , we assume that , with probability @xmath39 , @xmath25 does not jump at @xmath3 , and if a natural choice of @xmath25 _ does _ jump at @xmath3 with positive probability , then we just adapt it , only at @xmath3 , so that it does not jump there . we also make the following assumption . [ ycadlag ] @xmath40 is a cadlag process . within this framework , the assumption of no unmeasured confounding could be operationalized as follows . the rate at which the counting process @xmath25 jumps given past treatment- and covariate history is also the rate at which @xmath25 jumps given past treatment- and covariate history and @xmath41 . that is , the following : [ intconf ] the intensity process @xmath27 of @xmath25 with respect to @xmath29 is also an intensity process of @xmath25 with respect to @xmath42 . this can be interpreted as conditional independence ( given @xmath23 ) of treatment decisions at time @xmath7 and @xmath43 . this assumption is stronger than just conditional independence of treatment decisions at @xmath7 and @xmath21 as assumed in robins ( @xcite ) . however , also @xmath44 for @xmath45 is an indication of the patient s prognosis upon which treatment decisions at time @xmath7 ( @xmath46 ) should not depend . assumption [ intconf ] allows us to use the usual counting processes framework . under assumption [ intconf ] , @xmath47}\lambda(s)\ , ds$ ] is a martingale also with respect to @xmath42 and its usual augmentation @xmath48 . this formalization of the assumption of no unmeasured confounding in terms of compensators with respect to the filtration @xmath42 is a novel feature of this paper relative to the previous literature on structural nested models . robins et al . ( @xcite ) , @xcite and @xcite use a cox model for initiation and/or changes in treatment . however , none of them formalized the assumption of no unmeasured confounders in terms of compensators with respect to @xmath42 . as a consequence , they could not use the extensive theory on counting process martingales to show the asymptotics of their estimators , which then remained without proof . structural nested models in continuous time model distributional relations between @xmath21 and @xmath49 , for @xmath50 small , through a so - called infinitesimal shift - function @xmath51 . write @xmath52 for the cumulative distribution function and @xmath53 for its generalized inverse @xmath54 then the infinitesimal shift - function @xmath51 is defined as @xmath55 the ( right - hand ) derivative of the quantile quantile transform which moves quantiles of the distribution of @xmath21 to quantiles of the distribution of @xmath49 ( @xmath56 ) , given the covariate- and treatment history until time @xmath7 , @xmath15 . notice that for differentiability of @xmath57 with respect to @xmath58 we need that a short duration of treatment has only a small effect on the distribution of the outcome of interest ( see page 3 , second paragraph ) , since @xmath59 must be equal to @xmath60 . [ daexa ] robins , blevins , ritter and wulfsohn ( @xcite ) describe an aids clinical trial to study the effect of azt treatment on survival in hiv - infected subjects . embedded within this trial was an essentially uncontrolled observational study of the effect of prophylaxis therapy for pcp on survival . pcp , pneumocystis carinii pneumonia , is an opportunistic infection that afflicts aids patients . the aim of robins et al . ( @xcite ) was to study the effect of this prophylaxis therapy on survival . thus , the outcome of interest @xmath1 is the survival time , and the treatment under study is prophylaxis for pcp . once treatment with prophylaxis for pcp started , it was never stopped . suppose that @xmath61 then ( see section [ cmim ] for details ) , for @xmath62 , withholding treatment from @xmath7 onward leads to ( with @xmath63 meaning `` is distributed as '' ) @xmath64\\[-8pt ] & = & e^{\psi}\cdot \mathit{dur}(t , y)+1\cdot \bigl(y - t-\mathit{dur}(t , y)\bigr)\qquad \mbox{given } \overline{z}_t,\nonumber\end{aligned}\ ] ] with @xmath65 the duration of treatment in the interval @xmath66 . thus , treated residual survival time ( @xmath7 until @xmath1 ) is multiplied by @xmath67 by withholding treatment ; compare this with accelerated failure time models , see , for example , @xcite . this multiplication factor @xmath67 should be interpreted in a distributional way . one of the models studied in robins et al . ( @xcite ) assumes that ( [ dasim ] ) is true even with @xmath63 replaced by @xmath68 ( though only for @xmath69 ) . notice that supposing ( [ dasim ] ) to be true with @xmath63 replaced by @xmath68 would be much stronger . [ daexa2 ] consider the situation from example [ daexa ] again . in another model mentioned in robins , blevins , ritter and wulfsohn ( @xcite ) the factor with which treated residual survival time is multiplied when treatment is withheld can depend on the azt treatment the patient received and whether or not the patient had a history of pcp prior to start of pcp prophylaxis . since this was a clinical trial for azt treatment , the azt treatment was described by a single variable @xmath70 indicating the treatment arm the patient was randomized to ( @xmath70 is @xmath24 or @xmath39 ) . whether or not the patient had a pcp history prior to start of prophylaxis is described by an indicator variable @xmath71 . @xmath71 equals @xmath39 if the patient had pcp before or at @xmath7 _ and _ before prophylaxis treatment started ; otherwise @xmath71 equals @xmath24 . if @xmath72 then ( see section [ cmim ] for details ) withholding prophylaxis treatment from @xmath7 onward leads to @xmath73 for @xmath62 . [ prior ] following @xcite , again consider survival as the outcome of interest . suppose that it is known that treatment received at time @xmath7 only affects survival for patients destined to die by time @xmath74 if they would receive no further treatment . an example would be a setting in which failure is death from an infectious disease , the treatment is a preventive antibiotic treatment which is of no benefit unless the subject is already infected and , if death occurs , it always does within five weeks from the time of initial unrecorded subclinical infection . in that case , as remarked in @xcite , the natural restriction on @xmath51 is that @xmath75 more biostatistical examples of models for @xmath51 can be found in , for example , @xcite , witteman et al . ( @xcite ) , @xcite and keiding et al . ( @xcite ) . @xmath76 can be interpreted as the infinitesimal effect on the outcome @xmath1 of the treatment actually given in the time - interval @xmath77 ( relative to baseline treatment ) . to be more precise , from the definition of @xmath51 we have @xmath78 in figure [ dfig ] this is sketched . @xmath79 in the picture is the @xmath80th quantile of the distribution of @xmath21 given @xmath15 . for @xmath50 , the @xmath80th quantile of the distribution of @xmath49 given @xmath15 is @xmath81 . thus , to shift from quantiles of the distribution of @xmath21 to the distribution of @xmath49 given @xmath15 ( @xmath50 ) is approximately the same as to just add @xmath82 to those quantiles . for example , if @xmath83 lies to the right of @xmath84 for @xmath50 , then treatment between @xmath7 and @xmath85 increases the outcome ( in distribution ) , and @xmath86 is greater than @xmath24 . . ] consider again this interpretation of @xmath51 as the infinitesimal effect of treatment given in @xmath77 . if the outcome of interest is survival , then @xmath76 should be zero if @xmath15 indicates the patient is dead at time @xmath7 . indeed , in that case @xmath83 and @xmath84 should be almost surely the same for every @xmath56 , since withholding treatment after death does not change the survival time . thus , @xmath87 is constant in @xmath58 for @xmath56 and , therefore , @xmath88 . however , this reasoning is not precise because of the complication of null sets . we will therefore just formally define @xmath76 to be zero if the outcome of interest is survival and @xmath15 indicates the patient is dead at time @xmath7 . it can be shown that @xmath89 if treatment does not affect the outcome of interest , as was conjectured in @xcite . to be more precise , @xcite shows that , for example , @xmath89 if and only if , for every @xmath50 and @xmath7 , @xmath49 has the same distribution as @xmath21 given @xmath15 . that is , @xmath89 if and only if `` at any time @xmath7 , whatever patient characteristics are selected at that time ( @xmath15 ) , stopping ` treatment as given ' at some fixed time after @xmath7 would not change the distribution of the outcome in patients with these patient characteristics . '' in the rest of this article @xmath90 will always indicate a correctly specified parametric model for @xmath51 , with @xmath89 if @xmath91 . define @xmath92 as the continuous solution to the differential equation @xmath93 with final condition @xmath94 , the observed outcome ( see figure [ dtfig ] ) . then @xmath92 mimics @xmath21 in the sense that it has the same distribution as @xmath21 given @xmath15 . this rather surprising result was conjectured in @xcite and proved in lok ( @xcite ) . to prove this result , we need the following consistency assumption . to the differential equation @xmath95 with final condition @xmath94 in case the outcome is survival time . ] [ inst ] @xmath96 has the same distribution as @xmath1 given @xmath97 . notice that since by assumption no treatment was given after time @xmath3 and since treatment is right - continuous , there is no difference in treatment between @xmath96 and @xmath1 . we suppose that this assumption holds , and we also suppose that a short duration of treatment has only a small effect on the distribution of the outcome of interest ( @xmath98 ) . under these assumptions and regularity conditions only , lok ( @xcite ) proved that indeed equation ( [ xdef ] ) has a unique solution for every @xmath99 , and that this solution @xmath92 mimics @xmath21 in the sense that @xmath92 has the same distribution as @xmath21 given @xmath15 ( see appendix [ xtap ] ) . throughout this article we will assume that this result holds true . [ daexai ] survival of aids patients ( continuation of example ) . suppose that @xmath100 then @xmath101 if @xmath102 , and @xmath103 for @xmath104 . suppose now that one has a correctly specified parametric model for the infinitesimal shift - function @xmath51 , @xmath90 . then one can calculate `` @xmath105 , '' the solution to @xmath106 with final condition @xmath107 . for the true @xmath108 , @xmath105 has the same distribution as @xmath21 , the outcome with treatment stopped at @xmath7 , even given all patient - information at time @xmath7 , @xmath15 . so instead of the unobservable @xmath21 s , we have the observable @xmath109 s which for the true @xmath108 mimic the @xmath21 s . although we do not know the true @xmath108 , this result turns out to be very useful , both for estimating @xmath108 ( sections [ ees ] and [ asnorm ] ) and for testing [ section [ test ] ; notice that when testing whether treatment affects the outcome ( i.e. , whether @xmath89 ) , @xmath110 can simply be calculated from the data ( @xmath111 ) under the null hypothesis of no treatment effect ] . in this appendix we present conditions under which @xmath92 mimics @xmath21 in the sense that it has the same distribution as @xmath21 given @xmath15 . this result is used heavily in this article . for the proofs , which are lengthy and use discretization , we refer to lok ( @xcite ) . section [ xtapt ] deals with survival outcomes , section [ xtapy ] with other outcomes . survival outcomes require a different set of assumptions , as will become clear below . the conditions here are somewhat more restrictive than the ones in lok ( @xcite ) , but they are simpler . this section contains a sufficient set of regularity conditions to have existence and uniqueness of a solution @xmath92 to ( [ xdef ] ) , @xmath507 with final condition @xmath94 , the observed outcome ( see figure [ dtfig ] ) . furthermore , together with assumption [ inst ] ( consistency ) , they imply that @xmath92 has the same distribution as @xmath21 given @xmath15 . the regularity conditions below should be read as the following : there exist conditional distribution functions @xmath83 such that all these assumptions are satisfied . they can be relaxed to @xmath58 in a neighborhood of @xmath24 , if this neighborhood does not depend on @xmath16 . we only consider @xmath56 , so the derivative with respect to @xmath58 at @xmath508 is always the right - hand derivative . [ sup ] ( _ support _ ) . there exist finite numbers @xmath509 and @xmath510 such that all @xmath83 have the same bounded support @xmath511 $ ] . all @xmath512 have a continuous nonzero density @xmath513 on @xmath514 $ ] . there exists an @xmath216 such that @xmath515 for all @xmath514 $ ] , @xmath99 and @xmath10 $ ] . ( _ smoothness _ ) . for every @xmath99 , @xmath516 is differentiable with respect to @xmath7 , @xmath79 and @xmath58 with continuous derivatives on @xmath511\times[t_1,t_2)\times { \mathbb r}$ ] if @xmath11 does not jump in @xmath239 , with a continuous extension to @xmath511\times[t_1,t_2]\times [ 0,\infty)$ ] . the derivatives of @xmath512 with respect to @xmath79 and @xmath58 are bounded by constants @xmath315 and @xmath317 , respectively . @xmath517 and @xmath518 have derivatives with respect to @xmath79 which are bounded by constants @xmath519 and @xmath520 , respectively . the support conditions may be restrictive for certain applications . nevertheless , most real - life situations can be approximated this way , since @xmath509 and @xmath510 are unrestricted and @xmath216 is unrestricted , too . although the support conditions may well be stronger than necessary , they simplify the analysis considerably and , for that reason , they are adopted here . the smoothness conditions allow for nonsmoothness where the covariate- and treatment process @xmath11 jumps . this is important , since if the covariate- and treatment process @xmath11 jumps , this can lead to a different prognosis for the patient and thus to nonsmoothness of the functions concerned . [ thm1 ] suppose that regularity condition is satisfied . then @xmath76 exists . furthermore , for every @xmath99 , there exists exactly one continuous solution @xmath92 to @xmath95 with final condition @xmath94 . if also assumption ( consistency ) is satisfied and there are no more than finitely many times @xmath7 for which the probability that the covariate- and treatment process jumps at @xmath7 is greater than @xmath24 , then this @xmath92 has the same distribution as @xmath21 given @xmath15 for all @xmath10 $ ] . for a proof we refer to lok ( @xcite ) . this section contains a sufficient set of regularity conditions to have existence and uniqueness of a solution @xmath92 to equation ( [ xdef ] ) , @xmath95 with final condition @xmath94 , the observed outcome ( see figure [ dtfig ] ) . furthermore , together with assumption [ inst ] ( consistency ) and assumptions [ ttcons ] and [ ttinst ] below , they imply that @xmath92 has the same distribution as @xmath21 given @xmath15 . the conditions here are natural conditions if the outcome of interest @xmath1 is a survival time . as compared to section [ xtapy ] , we make two extra assumptions . the first is a consistency assumption , stating that stopping treatment after death does not change the survival time . the second assumption states that there is no instantaneous effect of treatment at the time the patient died [ notice that the difference between @xmath521 , the outcome with treatment stopped at the survival time @xmath1 , and @xmath1 is in treatment _ at _ @xmath1 ] . [ ttcons ] @xmath523 on @xmath524 . [ ttinst ] @xmath525 under these assumptions , treatment in the future does not cause or prevent death at present or before : [ conslem ] under assumptions and : for all @xmath56 : @xmath526 on @xmath527 . for all @xmath528 with @xmath529 and @xmath530 . for a proof we refer to @xcite . if the outcome is survival , the support condition in assumption [ xtapy ] , saying that all @xmath83 have the same bounded support @xmath511 $ ] , will not hold . the reason for this is as follows . @xmath15 includes the covariate - measurements and treatment until time @xmath7 . if covariates and treatment were measured at time @xmath7 , it can not be avoided to include in @xmath15 whether or not a patient was alive at time @xmath7 . given that a patient is dead at time @xmath7 and given his or her survival time , the distribution of this survival time can not have the fixed support @xmath511 $ ] , which is independent of @xmath7 . also , given that a patient is alive at time @xmath7 , this is hardly ever the case ; one often expects that @xmath7 is the left limit of the support . thus , in case the outcome is survival , the support condition for theorem [ thm1 ] has to be slightly changed . [ tsup ] there exists a finite number @xmath531 such that : for every @xmath99 and @xmath7 with @xmath102 , all @xmath83 for @xmath56 have support @xmath532 $ ] . for every @xmath99 and @xmath7 with @xmath102 , all @xmath512 for @xmath56 have a continuous nonzero density @xmath513 on @xmath533 $ ] . there exists a number @xmath216 such that , for all @xmath99 and @xmath7 with @xmath102 , @xmath534 for @xmath535 $ ] . next we look at the differentiability conditions in assumption [ sup ] . it does not seem reasonable to assume that @xmath512 is continuously differentiable with respect to @xmath58 and @xmath79 on @xmath536 $ ] since , for @xmath529 , @xmath537 [ lemma [ conslem](b ) ] . therefore , the derivative of @xmath512 with respect to @xmath58 is likely not to exist at @xmath538 ( and is equal to zero for @xmath539 ) . also , the derivative of @xmath512 with respect to @xmath79 may not exist at @xmath538 , because of the different treatment before and after @xmath85 . for survival outcomes , we replace the smoothness conditions of assumption [ sup ] by the following : [ tsmooth ] for every @xmath99 : if @xmath11 does not jump in @xmath239 and @xmath540 , the restriction of @xmath541 to @xmath542\times[t_1,t_2)\times { \mathbb r}_{\geq 0}\dvtx y\geq t+h\}$ ] is @xmath543 in @xmath528 . the derivatives of @xmath512 with respect to @xmath79 and @xmath58 are bounded by constants @xmath315 and @xmath317 , respectively , for @xmath533 $ ] . @xmath517 and @xmath518 have derivatives with respect to @xmath79 which are bounded by constants @xmath519 and @xmath520 , respectively , for @xmath533 $ ] . the smoothness condition above concentrates on @xmath544 . for @xmath545 we can choose @xmath537 because of lemma [ conslem](b ) . because of assumption [ inst ] ( consistency ) , @xmath546 has the same support as @xmath547 , so @xmath546 has support @xmath532 $ ] if @xmath102 [ assumption [ tsup](a ) ] . assume the following [ ytsup ] for all @xmath99 and @xmath7 with @xmath102 , @xmath548 is continuous and strictly increasing on its support @xmath532 $ ] . [ tthm1 ] suppose that regularity conditions and are satisfied . then @xmath76 exists . furthermore , for every @xmath99 , there exists exactly one continuous solution @xmath92 to @xmath95 with final condition @xmath94 . if also assumptions and ( consistency and no instantaneous treatment effect at time of death ) are satisfied , then this @xmath92 has the same distribution as @xmath21 given @xmath15 for all @xmath10 $ ] . for a proof we refer to lok ( @xcite ) . previous applications of structural nested models [ see , e.g. , robins et al . ( @xcite ) , @xcite ( @xcite ) , witteman et al . ( @xcite ) and keiding et al . ( @xcite ) ] have assumed the so - called local rank preservation condition . local rank preservation states that @xmath21 is a local solution to ( [ xdef ] ) . however , if @xmath21 is locally a solution to ( [ xdef ] ) , it is usually also globally a solution to ( [ xdef ] ) ; see , for example , theorem [ isun ] in the . hence , if one knew the parameter @xmath108 , every @xmath21 would be a deterministic function of the observed data . deterministic dependence of counterfactuals on the observed data is a very strong condition , which , though untestable , is generally considered implausible . the previous literature [ see , e.g. , @xcite ( @xcite ) , robins et al . ( @xcite ) , @xcite ( @xcite ) and keiding et al . ( @xcite ) ] acknowledged this problem , and conjectured that the assumption of local rank preservation could be relaxed in continuous time [ since it is known that the assumption of local rank preservation can be relaxed for structural nested models in discrete time ; this was pointed out by @xcite ( @xcite ) , and lok et al . ( @xcite ) provided a proof ] . see @xcite for a more elaborate discussion . the following example describes a setting where the assumption of local rank preservation is implausible . in the situation of example [ daexa ] , consider the following thought experiment . suppose that two patients had the same covariate history until time @xmath7 , and both received the same constant treatment to prevent pcp until time @xmath7 ( equal @xmath15 ) . suppose , furthermore , that both patients received no treatment after time @xmath7 , that they did not have pcp before time @xmath7 and both died at the same time @xmath112 ( for both , @xmath113 ) . possibly , the first patient would have had pcp at some time @xmath45 and would have died from it before @xmath114 in case he or she would not have been treated . possibly , the other patient would not have had pcp in case he or she would not have been treated , and would have died at the same time @xmath112 as without treatment . thus , it is easy to imagine that these patients would have had different outcomes under no treatment ( different @xmath115 ) . however , the assumption of local rank preservation excludes this possibility . local rank preservation is a very strong condition , for which structural nested models have previously been attacked . in fact , this article shows that the assumption of local rank preservation is not needed for structural nested models . however , proofs would be much easier under rank preservation ; for details , see the remarks before the proofs of theorems [ thec ] and [ mgc ] . see also @xcite for a more informal reasoning . to estimate the infinitesimal shift - function @xmath51 , @xcite proposes to use a ( semi-)parametric model to predict future treatment ( @xmath25 in our case ) on the basis of past treatment- and covariate history @xmath23 . this may seem odd , since prediction of treatment is not what we are interested in . however , we will show that such a model to predict treatment changes can indeed be a tool to get unbiased estimating equations for the parameter @xmath108 in the model for @xmath51 . moreover , often doctors may have a better understanding , at least qualitatively , about how decisions about treatment were made than about the effect of the treatment . in what follows we will assume that @xmath116 is a correctly specified parametric model for the intensity @xmath30 of @xmath25 . recall from section [ nounsec ] that , under no unmeasured confounding ( assumption [ intconf ] ) , @xmath21 does not contain information about treatment changes given past treatment- and covariate history @xmath23 . since @xmath92 has the same distribution as @xmath21 given @xmath15 , one could expect that also @xmath92 does not contain information about treatment changes given @xmath23 . unfortunately , this reasoning is not precise : we have to somehow deal with null sets since the probability that treatment changes at @xmath7 given past covariate- and treatment history is often equal to @xmath24 for each @xmath7 . in section [ mgs ] we will show how this can be dealt with . in the current section we present a class of unbiased estimating equations for @xmath117 and @xmath108 . these will be used for the proof in the next section , but they are also of interest in their own . in section [ mgs ] we will see that these estimating equations are in fact martingales , for the true parameters @xmath118 and @xmath119 . recall from section [ nounsec ] that , under no unmeasured confounding , we have the martingale @xmath47}\lambda(s)\,ds$ ] with respect to the filtration @xmath42 and its usual augmentation . from this martingale we can construct a whole family of martingales . if @xmath120 is a @xmath48-predictable process , then , under regularity conditions , @xmath121 is a martingale with respect to @xmath48 . for a more formal statement , we first make sure that @xmath120 is predictable . we put the following restriction on the functions @xmath122 we consider here : [ hreg ] when in this section we consider functions @xmath122 from @xmath123 , we assume that they are measurable and satisfy the following : @xmath122 is bounded by a constant which does not depend on @xmath7 and @xmath16 , for all @xmath124 $ ] , @xmath125 and @xmath99 , @xmath126 when @xmath127 and @xmath128 . for such @xmath122 , @xmath120 is a @xmath48-predictable process : [ hpred ] suppose that @xmath40 is cadlag assumption . then @xmath129 is a @xmath48-predictable process for any @xmath122 satisfying restriction . proof @xmath120 is adapted . it is also left - continuous : because @xmath40 is cadlag , @xmath130 exists . thus , we come to the following lemma : [ lemec ] under assumptions bounded intensity process @xmath40 cadlag and [ intconf ] ( no unmeasured confounding ) , @xmath131 is a martingale on @xmath2 $ ] with respect to @xmath48 for all @xmath122 satisfying restriction . proof @xmath132 is a martingale on @xmath2 $ ] with respect to @xmath48 , because of assumption [ intconf ] . it is of integrable variation . because of lemma [ hpred ] , @xmath133 is a @xmath48-predictable process . it is also bounded [ restriction [ hreg](a ) ] . hence,@xmath134 is an integral of a bounded predictable process with respect to a martingale of integrable variation , and , therefore , a @xmath48-martingale . to construct unbiased estimating equations for @xmath135 , we need to assume that the probability that @xmath136 and @xmath40 jump at the same time is zero . this assumption is a formalization of the assumption of no instantaneous treatment effect as proposed in @xcite , which can be seen as follows . given @xmath23 and @xmath137 , @xmath25 jumps at @xmath7 with rate @xmath27 ( assumption [ intconf ] , no unmeasured confounding ) . @xmath40 is a cadlag process ( assumption [ ycadlag ] ) , which thus for every @xmath99 jumps at most countably many times on the finite time interval @xmath2 $ ] . therefore , if @xmath40 and @xmath25 would jump at the same time with positive probability , this would imply a dependence of these jumps ; the obvious interpretation of this dependence would be that a change of treatment instantaneously affects the outcome of interest . [ jump ] the probability that there exists a @xmath7 such that @xmath136 and @xmath40 both jump at time @xmath7 is @xmath24 . notice that this excludes estimation of the effect of point exposures . for example , if treatment is surgery or another point exposure given at some time @xmath7 , the outcome under `` treatment stopped at time @xmath7 '' will typically jump at time @xmath7 if treatment affects the outcome of interest , at the same time as the treatment itself . however , this assumption does not exclude the possibility that the outcome differs depending on whether a patient is treated or not at a certain point in time . for example , @xmath138 and @xmath139 may be different when a virus is contacted at time @xmath7 . the model in this article can accommodate differences between @xmath138 and @xmath139 , as long as the probability that the observed treatment changes is @xmath24 at that precise time . or , in more generality , as long as the probability that @xmath25 jumps at the same time is @xmath24 . this was previously noticed in @xcite , section 8 . the estimating procedures in this article do not deal with instantaneous treatment effects . suppose that the above conditions hold and that @xmath140 for @xmath10 $ ] ( see section [ cmim ] ) . then if @xmath141 and @xmath116 are correctly specified ( parametric ) models for @xmath51 and @xmath30 , respectively , each choice of @xmath122 satisfying restriction [ hreg ] leads to an unbiased estimating equation for both the parameter of interest @xmath108 and the ( nuisance ) parameter @xmath117 : [ thec ] suppose that assumptions bounded intensity process@xmath40 cadlag ( no unmeasured confounding ) and ( no instantaneous treatment effect ) are satisfied . suppose also that , for every @xmath10 $ ] , @xmath92 has the same distribution as @xmath21 given @xmath15 . then @xmath142 for each @xmath122 satisfying restriction . thus , if @xmath90 and @xmath116 are correctly specified parametric models for @xmath51 and @xmath30 , respectively , @xmath143 with @xmath144 the empirical measure @xmath145 , is an unbiased estimating equation for @xmath146 , for each @xmath122 satisfying restriction . @xmath122 here is allowed to depend on @xmath108 and @xmath117 , as long as it satisfies restriction for @xmath146 . as before , @xmath109 here is the continuous solution of ( [ xpsi ] ) , @xmath147 with boundary condition @xmath107 . moreover , as before , we assume that for all @xmath90 we have existence and uniqueness of such solutions ; theorem [ isun ] in the appendix provides sufficient conditions for that . under local rank preservation ( see section [ loc ] ) , @xmath148 for each @xmath7 . in that case theorem [ thec ] follows immediately from lemma [ lemec ] . however , as argued in section [ loc ] , local rank preservation is generally considered implausible . proof of theorem [ thec ] we have to show that @xmath149 has expectation zero for all @xmath122 satisfying restriction [ hreg ] . to do that , we prove that it has the same expectation as @xmath150 which has expectation zero because of lemma [ lemec ] . we will first show that the terms with @xmath151 have the same expectation , that is , @xmath152 after that we show that the terms with @xmath153 have the same expectation , that is , @xmath154 as we will see below , ( [ firste ] ) and ( [ seconde ] ) have to be proved separately , since we do not have or expect that @xmath155 for @xmath45 ; we only have this for @xmath156 . therefore , the approximations below have to be chosen carefully . at first we prove ( [ firste ] ) , by approximating these sums and showing that the approximations have the same expectation . next we show that the approximations converge and that ( [ firste ] ) follows with lebesgue s dominated convergence theorem . define @xmath157 , @xmath158 , etc . , the jump times of the counting process @xmath25 in the interval @xmath2 $ ] . they are measurable [ e.g. , because of @xcite ( @xcite ) , lemma 74.4 ] . note that the number of jumps in @xmath2 $ ] is almost surely finite because @xmath25 is integrable ( it has a bounded intensity process ) . in the following read @xmath159 if there is no @xmath160th jump of @xmath25 in the interval @xmath2 $ ] . next split up the interval @xmath2 $ ] in intervals of equal length : for @xmath161 fixed , put @xmath162 , @xmath163 . fix @xmath164 for the moment . the right - hand side of equation ( [ firste ] ) is harder to approximate than the left - hand side , both because @xmath21 does not need to be continuous in @xmath7 while @xmath92 does and because knowing @xmath21 and @xmath15 does not imply knowing @xmath44 for @xmath45 and we do not have or expect @xmath155 for @xmath45 . the approximations we choose are @xmath165\\[-8pt ] \qquad & \approx & \sum_{j=1}^\infty\sum_{k=0}^{k-1 } 1_{(\tau_k,\tau_{k+1}]}(t_j ) h_{\tau_{k}}\bigl(y^{(\tau_{k+1})},\overline{z}_{\tau_{k}-}\bigr)\nonumber\end{aligned}\ ] ] and @xmath166\\[-8pt ] \qquad & \approx & \sum_{j=1}^\infty\sum_{k=0}^{k-1 } 1_{(\tau_k,\tau_{k+1}]}(t_j ) h_{\tau_{k}}\bigl(x(\tau_{k+1}),\overline{z}_{\tau_{k}-}\bigr).\nonumber\end{aligned}\ ] ] to show that these approximations have the same expectation , we use that @xmath167 . therefore , also @xmath168}(t_j ) h_{\tau_{k}}(x(\tau_{k+1}),\overline{z}_{\tau_{k-}})\sim 1_{(\tau_k,\tau_{k+1}]}(t_j ) h_{\tau_{k}}\bigl(y^{(\tau_{k+1})},\overline{z}_{\tau_{k-}}\bigr)\ ] ] [ notice that @xmath169}(t_j)$ ] is a function of @xmath170 . hence , the expectation of each of the terms on the right - hand side of ( [ apy ] ) is equal to the expectation of the corresponding term on the right - hand side of ( [ apx ] ) . since @xmath122 is bounded [ restriction [ hreg](a ) ] and the expected number of jump times @xmath171 is finite ( @xmath25 is integrable ) , this implies that the expectation of the right hand - side of equation ( [ apy ] ) is equal to the expectation of the right - hand side of equation ( [ apx ] ) . equation ( [ firste ] ) follows if the expectation of the approximations in ( [ apy ] ) and ( [ apx ] ) converges to the right - hand side and left - hand side of equation ( [ firste ] ) , respectively . this convergence is harder to show for ( [ apy ] ) than for ( [ apx ] ) , since @xmath40 may jump [ while @xmath172 does not , by construction ] . fix @xmath160 for a moment . define @xmath173 and @xmath174 as the grid points such that @xmath175 $ ] . as @xmath176 , @xmath177 , so that since @xmath178 is cadlag , @xmath179 . moreover , as @xmath180 , @xmath181 , so that because of restriction [ hreg ] on @xmath58 , @xmath182 . combining this for all @xmath160 leads to @xmath183}(t_j ) h_{\tau_{k}}\bigl(y^{(\tau_{k+1})},\overline{z}_{\tau_{k-}}\bigr ) \rightarrow \sum_{j=1}^\infty h_{t_j}\bigl(y^{(t_{j})},\overline{z}_{t_j-}\bigr)\ ] ] as @xmath184 for every @xmath31 for which the number of jumps of @xmath25 is finite , so for almost every @xmath99 . @xmath122 is bounded [ restriction [ hreg](a ) ] and the left - hand side is bounded by the number of jumps of @xmath25 times this bound . the expectation of that is finite because @xmath25 is integrable . thus , lebesgue s dominated convergence theorem can be applied , and @xmath185}(t_j ) h_{\tau_{k}}\bigl(y^{(\tau_{k+1})},\overline{z}_{\tau_{k}-}\bigr)\biggr ) \rightarrow e\biggl(\sum_{j=1}^\infty h_{t_{j}}\bigl(y^{(t_{j})},\overline{z}_{t_j-}\bigr)\biggr)\ ] ] as @xmath184 . because with probability one @xmath40 and @xmath25 do not jump at the same time ( assumption [ jump ] of no instantaneous treatment effect ) , @xmath186 so that we can replace @xmath187 by @xmath188 on the right - hand side of ( [ naarplus ] ) . therefore , indeed , the expectation of the approximation in ( [ apy ] ) converges to the expectation of the left - hand side of ( [ apy ] ) . the same reasoning shows this for ( [ apx ] ) . here less caution is necessary since @xmath92 is continuous in @xmath7 . that concludes the proof of equation ( [ firste ] ) . next we prove ( [ seconde ] ) , also by approximation . here , too , we show that the approximations have the same expectation and that ( [ seconde ] ) follows with lebesgue s dominated convergence theorem . divide the interval @xmath2 $ ] as above . the approximations we choose here are @xmath189 and @xmath190 because @xmath191 and @xmath192 are a measurable function of @xmath193 ( assumption [ int ] , bounded intensity process ) , the expectation of each of the terms in ( [ apy2 ] ) is equal to the expectation of the corresponding term in ( [ apx2 ] ) . thus , the expectations of these approximations are equal . equation ( [ seconde ] ) follows if the expectation of the approximations in ( [ apy2 ] ) and ( [ apx2 ] ) converge to the right - hand side and left - hand side of equation ( [ seconde ] ) , respectively . this convergence is also harder to show for ( [ apy2 ] ) than for ( [ apx2 ] ) because of possible discontinuities of @xmath40 . first notice that as @xmath184 , for @xmath7 fixed , @xmath194}(t ) h_{\tau_k}\bigl(y^{(\tau_k)},\overline{z}_{\tau_k-}\bigr ) \lambda(\tau_k)\rightarrow h_{t}\bigl(y^{(t-)},\overline{z}_{t-}\bigr ) \lambda(t)\ ] ] for every @xmath99 fixed and for every @xmath195 : @xmath40 has limits from the left ( assumption [ ycadlag ] ) , so that as @xmath196 , restriction [ hreg](b ) on @xmath58 can be used , and @xmath30 is continuous from the left [ assumption [ int](b ) ] . taking integrals and applying lebesgue s dominated convergence theorem [ @xmath122 and @xmath30 are bounded because of restriction [ hreg](a ) and assumption [ int](a ) , resp . ] leads to @xmath197 for every @xmath99 . as both @xmath58 and @xmath30 are bounded , lebesgue s dominated convergence theorem guarantees that indeed the expectation of the approximation in ( [ apy2 ] ) converges to the expectation of the left - hand side of ( [ apy2 ] ) . the same reasoning shows this for ( [ apx2 ] ) , which concludes the proof of equation ( [ seconde ] ) and theorem [ thec ] . @xcite shows that if the rest of the conditions in this section are satisfied , assumption [ jump ] ( treatment does not instantaneously affect the outcome of interest ) is a necessary condition for theorem [ thec ] . [ wei ] consider the setting of examples [ daexa ] and [ daexa2 ] and define @xmath198 if prophylaxis treatment started at or before time @xmath7 and @xmath24 otherwise . suppose that initiation of prophylaxis treatment can be correctly modeled with the time - dependent weibull proportional hazards model @xmath199 where @xmath200 equals @xmath39 if the patient had pcp before time @xmath7 and @xmath24 otherwise , and @xmath201 and @xmath202 are greater than zero [ for more about the weibull proportional hazards model and its applications see , e.g. , @xcite ( @xcite ) ] . if the patient died before @xmath7 or prophylaxis treatment already started before , the patient is not `` at risk '' for initiation of treatment and , thus , @xmath30 equals @xmath24 . then the ( partial ) score equations for estimation of @xmath203 are @xmath204 such estimating equations can also be written down for the model including @xmath205 , @xmath206 @xcite proposes to estimate the parameters in a model like this by choosing those parameters @xmath207 which maximize the likelihood when @xmath208 is considered fixed and known , and for which @xmath209 : for the true @xmath108 , @xmath210 does not contribute to the model for treatment changes ( under no unmeasured confounding ) . to make the connection with the estimators in the current article , notice that this leads to the same estimators as the ones that solve the estimating equations arising from the likelihood when @xmath208 is considered fixed and known , with @xmath211 put to zero . more precise , since we know that the true @xmath211 is equal to @xmath24 , we put @xmath211 equal to @xmath24 and get the estimating equations @xmath212 for the parameter @xmath108 ( and thus also for @xmath51 ) and the ( nuisance ) parameters @xmath203 . these estimating equations are of the form of theorem [ thec ] , @xmath213 but the function @xmath122 here is not bounded and @xmath30 need not be bounded ( if @xmath214 ) , so unbiasedness does not follow immediately from theorem [ thec ] . however , we could restrict the interval @xmath2 $ ] to @xmath215 $ ] for @xmath216 ( to assure that @xmath30 is bounded ) and @xmath217 can be approximated by the bounded functions @xmath218 ( @xmath219 ) ( to make @xmath122 bounded ) , which all lead to unbiased estimating equations because of theorem [ thec ] . the above estimating equations are then also unbiased because of lebesgue s dominated convergence theorem [ the dominating function is integrable since @xmath220 which is finite since @xmath221 . under the model for @xmath51 of example [ daexa ] , @xmath222 if the patient did not die before time @xmath7 . in that case these are five unbiased estimating equations for five unknown parameters . if the parameter @xmath108 is of dimension greater than @xmath39 , more unbiased estimating equations can be constructed by adding more terms of the form @xmath223 . we show that , under no unmeasured confounding , just as @xmath21 , @xmath92 does not predict treatment changes , given past treatment- and covariate history @xmath23 . we could hope for that since @xmath224 given @xmath15 ( see section [ cmim ] ) . the formal statement is ( compare with assumption [ intconf ] , no unmeasured confounding ) the following : the intensity process @xmath27 of @xmath25 with respect to @xmath29 is also the intensity process of @xmath25 with respect to @xmath225 . then @xmath226 is also a martingale with respect to @xmath225 . that will be useful later when we study the behavior of estimators @xmath227 and @xmath228 which are constructed with estimating equations of the form of theorem [ thec ] , @xmath229 . for example , we can use the fact that usually @xmath230}h(s)\,dm(s)$ ] is a martingale if @xmath38 is a martingale and @xmath231 a predictable process ; a sufficient condition for this is that @xmath232 . before going on , we first clarify why @xmath233 is indeed a filtration . for @xmath45 , @xmath234 is a deterministic ( though unknown ) function of @xmath235 ( i.e. , if solutions to the differential equation with @xmath51 are unique ; see , e.g. , theorem [ isun ] in the ) . similarly , for @xmath45 , @xmath92 is a deterministic function of @xmath236 . in the rest of this article we will assume that these functions are measurable functions on @xmath237 ( sufficient conditions for that are that the infinitesimal shift - function @xmath51 satisfies regularity assumption [ dreg ] below and that for each @xmath99 , @xmath11 only jumps finitely many times ; see appendix [ smtb ] , lemma [ mtb ] ) . thus , @xmath238 we will use the filtration @xmath233 below , keeping in mind that it is indeed a filtration and satisfies equation ( [ fil ] ) . in the rest of this section we assume that the infinitesimal shift - function @xmath51 satisfies the following regularity condition : [ dreg ] ( _ continuity between the jump times of _ @xmath11 ) . if @xmath11 does not jump in @xmath239 , then @xmath76 is continuous in @xmath240 on @xmath241 and can be continuously extended to @xmath242 $ ] . ( _ boundedness _ ) . for each @xmath99 , there exists a constant @xmath243 such that @xmath244 for all @xmath10 $ ] and all @xmath79 . ( _ lipschitz continuity _ ) . for each @xmath99 , there exist constants @xmath245 and @xmath246 with @xmath247 for all @xmath10 $ ] and all @xmath248 and @xmath249 if @xmath45 and @xmath11 does not jump in @xmath250 $ ] . most regularity conditions on @xmath51 here are satisfied for the @xmath51 s from appendix [ xtap ] [ see also lok ( @xcite ) ] . only the second lipschitz condition is extra . the lipschitz conditions are satisfied , for example , if , in between the jump times of @xmath11 , @xmath51 is continuously differentiable with respect to @xmath79 and @xmath7 with derivatives which are bounded for every fixed @xmath99 . the next theorem states that @xmath38 is indeed also a martingale with respect to @xmath225 : [ mgc ] suppose that the conditions of theorem hold : assumptions ( bounded intensity process ) , ( @xmath40 cadlag ) , ( no unmeasured confounding ) , ( no instantaneous treatment effect ) and for every @xmath10 $ ] , @xmath92 has the same distribution as @xmath21 given @xmath15 . suppose , furthermore , that for each @xmath99 , @xmath11 jumps at most finitely many times , and that @xmath51 satisfies regularity condition [ dreg ] . then the intensity process @xmath27 of @xmath25 with respect to @xmath29 is also the intensity process of @xmath25 with respect to the filtration @xmath225 . recall that in section [ cmim ] we already mentioned that , under regularity conditions , @xmath92 mimics @xmath21 in the sense that it has the same distribution as @xmath21 given @xmath15 . under local rank preservation ( see section [ loc ] ) , @xmath148 for each @xmath7 . in that case theorem [ mgc ] would be the same as the assumption of no unmeasured confounding [ intconf ] . however , as argued in section [ loc ] , local rank preservation is generally considered implausible . proof of theorem [ mgc ] because of assumption [ int ] , @xmath251 is predictable with respect to @xmath29 , so then it is also predictable with respect to the larger filtration @xmath225 . we still need to prove that @xmath38 is a martingale with respect to @xmath225 . since a cadlag martingale with respect to some filtration is also a martingale with respect to its usual augmentation [ see @xcite ( @xcite ) , lemma 67.10 ] , it suffices to prove that @xmath38 is a martingale with respect to @xmath233 . thus we need to prove that , for @xmath252 , @xmath253 = 0.\ ] ] this is not immediate , since we do not have or expect that @xmath254 if @xmath255 . by the definition of conditional expectation , the above is the same as @xmath256 for all @xmath257 . because of theorem 34.1 in @xcite , it is sufficient to consider @xmath258 s forming a @xmath259-system generating @xmath260 . with @xmath261 the @xmath18-algebra on @xmath262 , @xmath263 is such a @xmath259-system : it is closed under the formation of finite intersections and generates @xmath260 . therefore , we only consider @xmath258 s of this form . we prove ( [ enul ] ) for any @xmath264 . let @xmath265 be any approximation of @xmath266 which is continuous for every fixed @xmath267 , with @xmath268 for every @xmath269 as @xmath270 and @xmath271 for all @xmath269 and @xmath267 . then @xmath272}\ , dm(t)\biggr)\\ & & \qquad = e\int 1_{(t_1,t_2]}(t)\ , 1_a(\overline{z}_{t_1 } ) 1_{(x_1,x_2)}(x(t_1))\ , dm(t)\\ & & \qquad = e \int 1_{(t_1,t_2]}(t)\ , 1_a(\overline{z}_{t_1 } ) \lim_{n\rightarrow \infty } 1^{(n)}_{(x_1,x_2)}(x(t_1))\ , dm(t)\\ & & \qquad = e\lim_{n\rightarrow \infty } \int 1_{(t_1,t_2]}(t)\ , 1_a(\overline{z}_{t_1 } ) 1^{(n)}_{(x_1,x_2)}(x(t_1 ) ) \bigl(dn(t)-\lambda(t)\,dt\bigr)\\ & & \qquad=\lim_{n\rightarrow \infty } e \int 1_{(t_1,t_2]}(t)\ , 1_a(\overline{z}_{t_1 } ) 1^{(n)}_{(x_1,x_2)}(x(t_1))\,dm(t).\end{aligned}\ ] ] the last two equalities follow from lebesgue s dominated convergence theorem [ the prior to last equality since , for @xmath273 fixed , the integral is bounded since @xmath25 is finite and @xmath30 is bounded ; the last equality since the integrals are all bounded by @xmath274 , whose expectation is bounded by @xmath275 times the upper bound of @xmath30 ] . equation ( [ enul ] ) and the result of the theorem would follow from theorem [ thec ] if @xmath277}(t)\ , 1_a(\overline{z}_{t_1 } ) 1^{(n)}_{(x_1,x_2)}(x(t_1 ) ) = h^{(n)}_t(x(t),\overline{z}_{t-})\ ] ] for some @xmath278 from @xmath279 satisfying restriction [ hreg ] for each fixed @xmath267 . in principle , this seems possible , since @xmath280 is a function of @xmath92 and @xmath23 for every @xmath281 . indeed , under the conditions above on @xmath51 and @xmath11 , it is possible to find such an @xmath278 , as follows . write @xmath282 for the solution of the differential equation @xmath283 with ( final or initial , depending on @xmath7 ) condition @xmath284 . existence and uniqueness of @xmath282 on @xmath2 $ ] for every fixed @xmath99 follows from theorem [ isun ] in appendix [ difeqap ] . in this notation , @xmath285}(t)\ , 1_a(\overline{z}_{t_1 } ) 1^{(n)}_{(x_1,x_2)}(x(t_1))\nonumber\\ & & \qquad=1_{(t_1,t_2]}(t)\ , 1_a(\overline{z}_{t_1 } ) 1^{(n)}_{(x_1,x_2)}(x(t_1;t , x(t ) ) ) = h^{(n)}_t(x(t),\overline{z}_{t-})\end{aligned}\ ] ] with @xmath286}(t)\ , 1_a(\overline{z}_{t_1 } ) 1^{(n)}_{(x_1,x_2)}(x(t_1;t , y)).\ ] ] we have to show that ( [ ht ] ) satisfies restriction [ hreg ] . first we show that , for @xmath7 fixed , @xmath287 is measurable . from ( [ ht ] ) we see that this is the case if @xmath288 is measurable , which follows immediately from lemma [ mtb ] . restriction [ hreg](a ) is immediate , since @xmath278 is bounded by 1 . for restriction [ hreg](b ) , we have to prove that , for all @xmath99 , @xmath289 when @xmath127 and @xmath128 . fix @xmath99 . we consider three different kinds of @xmath290 . if @xmath291 and @xmath128 , @xmath292 , so that the convergence follows immediately . if @xmath293 and @xmath128 , eventually @xmath294 , so that the convergence also follows immediately . if @xmath295 $ ] , convergence of the first two factors is immediate . for the last factor , we need differential equation theory . @xmath296 is continuous . thus , to prove that the last factor in equation ( [ ht ] ) converges , it suffices to show that @xmath297 as @xmath128 and @xmath127 . fix @xmath99 . for @xmath7 close enough to @xmath290 , we compare the solution of the differential equation with final condition @xmath79 at @xmath7 with the solution of the differential equation with final condition @xmath298 at @xmath290 ; we look at the value of the solution at the time point @xmath299 before both @xmath7 and @xmath290 . first , notice that because of existence and uniqueness of solutions ( theorem [ isun ] ) , the solution of the differential equation with final condition @xmath79 at @xmath7 takes a unique value @xmath300 at @xmath290 . since @xmath269 is differentiable with respect to its first argument with derivative @xmath51 and @xmath51 is bounded by @xmath243 [ assumption [ dreg](b ) ] , @xmath301 is not far from @xmath79 if @xmath7 is not far from @xmath290 : @xmath302 next , notice that , again because of existence and uniqueness of solutions , the value at @xmath299 of the solution of the differential equation with final condition @xmath79 at @xmath7 is the same as the value at @xmath299 of the solution of the differential equation with final condition @xmath300 at @xmath290 . this observation implies that @xmath303 for the first inequality , we use corollary [ difbc1 ] and assumption [ dreg ] [ notice that possible jumps of @xmath51 at the jump times of @xmath11 do not matter here since one can split up the interval , so if , e.g. , there is just one jump at @xmath304 $ ] , one gets a factor @xmath305 etc . ( a formal proof can be given with induction since , with @xmath99 still fixed , there are only finitely many jumps of @xmath11 ) ] . for the last inequality , we use equation ( [ yyt ] ) . if @xmath127 and @xmath128 , the bound in equation ( [ xafs ] ) converges to @xmath24 for every fixed @xmath99 . thus , indeed , if @xmath127 and @xmath128 , @xmath306 converges to @xmath307 . this finishes the proof . the estimating equations for @xmath308 from section [ ees ] were all of the form @xmath309 . in the current section we choose the dimension of @xmath310 the same as the dimension of @xmath308 . estimating equations of this form are well known . theorem [ consas ] below is an example of asymptotic theory in the setting of this article , with conditions in terms of @xmath58 and the intensity process @xmath30 . notice , however , that these conditions are in fact stronger than necessary . for more theory about these types of estimating equations and less restrictive conditions , see @xcite , chapter 5 . in particular , conditions could be weakened by considering the estimating equations as a whole instead of looking at @xmath58 and @xmath30 separately ( see , e.g. , example [ weilem ] ) . we only consider smooth @xmath311 : [ hregpc ] the functions @xmath312 are measurable and : every component of @xmath313 satisfies restriction [ hreg ] . @xmath314 is bounded by a constant @xmath315 not depending on @xmath117 , @xmath108 , @xmath7 , @xmath79 and @xmath99 . for each @xmath10 $ ] and @xmath99 , @xmath316 is continuous . there exists a neighborhood of @xmath135 such that , for each @xmath10 $ ] and @xmath99 , @xmath314 is continuously differentiable with respect to @xmath117 , @xmath108 and @xmath79 , and these derivatives are all bounded by a constant @xmath317 not depending on @xmath117 , @xmath108 , @xmath7 , @xmath79 and @xmath99 . every component of @xmath318 satisfies restriction [ hreg ] . [ consas ] suppose that assumptions ( bounded intensity process ) , [ @xmath178 cadlag ] , ( no unmeasured confounding ) and no instantaneous treatment effect are satisfied . suppose also that , for every @xmath10 $ ] , @xmath92 has the same distribution as @xmath21 given @xmath15 . from theorem we know that , for @xmath58 satisfying restriction , @xmath135 is a zero of @xmath319 suppose now that @xmath135 is the only zero . suppose , furthermore , that we know that @xmath320 with @xmath321 compact , that @xmath322 is continuous for each @xmath7 and bounded by a constant @xmath323 which does not depend on @xmath324 , and that @xmath325 is continuous for each @xmath7 . then any sequence of ( almost ) zeros @xmath326 of @xmath327 that is , any sequence of estimators @xmath326 such that @xmath328 converges in probability to zero , is a consistent estimator for @xmath135 for each @xmath122 satisfying restriction . suppose , moreover , that @xmath329 is differentiable with the respect to @xmath117 with derivative bounded by a constant @xmath330 in a neighborhood of @xmath118 , and @xmath331 is differentiable with respect to @xmath108 with the derivative bounded by a constant @xmath332 in a neighborhood of @xmath119 . then for each @xmath58 satisfying restriction [ hregpc ] there is a neighborhood of @xmath135 such that @xmath333 is continuously differentiable with respect to @xmath308 . suppose , moreover , that the matrix @xmath334 is nonsingular . then there exists a sequence of ( almost ) zeros @xmath326 to @xmath335 . furthermore , any such sequence is asymptotically normal : @xmath336 with @xmath337 the matrix above and , with @xmath338 , @xmath339 proof consistency follows from theorem 5.9 of @xcite . repeatedly applying lebesgue s dominated convergence theorem shows that our conditions imply the conditions of the first and second paragraph after this theorem 5.9 . the existence of ( almost ) zeros follows from @xcite , section 3.9 , problem 9 , whose solution is practically given by the hint below it . this problem 9 states that if @xmath340 is a homeomorphism of a neighborhood of @xmath341 onto a neighborhood of @xmath342 , then every continuous @xmath343 for which @xmath344 is sufficiently small has at least one zero . in our case @xmath345 is continuously differentiable in a neighborhood of @xmath135 by restriction [ hregpc](d ) and the assumptions on @xmath116 and @xmath105 , under which differentiation and integration can be exchanged ( twice ) . the derivative of this @xmath346 at @xmath135 is nonsingular by assumption , and hence , @xmath310 is a homeomorphism of a neighborhood of @xmath341 onto a neighborhood of @xmath347 . @xmath335 is continuous in @xmath308 and close enough to @xmath346 for large @xmath267 with probability approaching @xmath39 because of the second paragraph below theorem 5.9 in @xcite . hence , @xmath335 has a zero with probability approaching @xmath39 . asymptotic normality follows from theorem 5.21 of @xcite , as follows . define @xmath348 , which is continuously differentiable with respect to @xmath308 in a neighborhood @xmath349 of @xmath135 under our conditions . making @xmath349 smaller so that all boundedness conditions hold on @xmath349 , we define @xmath350 , which is bounded by @xmath351 , a constant plus a constant times @xmath352 . this @xmath353 is square integrable since @xmath352 is square integrable : it is well known that counting processes with bounded intensity processes are square integrable [ it follows from , e.g. , proposition ii.4.1 of andersen et al . ( @xcite ) ] . for the same reason , @xmath354 . the remaining conditions of theorem 5.21 from @xcite were checked before , so , indeed , @xmath326 is asymptotically normal with asymptotic covariance matrix ( [ asvar ] ) . the asymptotic variance ( [ asvar ] ) is often estimated by replacing @xmath135 by their estimates and @xmath355 by @xmath144 . thus , confidence intervals for @xmath119 can be constructed . also , tests for whether @xmath119 has a specific value can be constructed that way . for more about testing , see section [ test ] . one can often simplify the expression for the asymptotic variance in equation ( [ asvar ] ) using corollary [ casvar ] below . we use the following lemma : [ caslem ] suppose that the conditions of theorem hold : assumptions bounded intensity process [ @xmath40 cadlag ] , no unmeasured confoundingno instantaneous treatment effect , for every @xmath10 $ ] , @xmath92 has the same distribution as @xmath21 given @xmath15 ( see section ) , for each @xmath99 , @xmath11 jumps at most finitely many times , and @xmath51 satisfies regularity condition . write @xmath356 and @xmath338 . then for @xmath357 every component of which satisfies restriction @xmath358 if , furthermore , @xmath359 is a correctly specified model for @xmath30 such that @xmath360 exists and @xmath141 is a correctly specified model for @xmath51 such that , for each @xmath7 , @xmath109 is differentiable with respect to @xmath108 at @xmath361 , then , for @xmath362 satisfying restriction [ hregpc ] , @xmath363 if the left- or right - hand side exists and @xmath364 if the left- or right - hand side exists , where @xmath365 . proof for the first statement , we use counting process theory from andersen et al . ( @xcite ) , chapter 2 . if @xmath366 is a martingale , @xmath367 ( if it exists ) is defined as a predictable process such that @xmath368 is a ( local ) martingale . if @xmath369 is another martingale , @xmath370 ( if it exists ) is defined as a predictable process such that @xmath371 is a ( local ) martingale . @xmath367 is called the predictable variation process of @xmath366 and @xmath370 is called the predictable covariation process of @xmath366 and @xmath369 . for vector - valued @xmath366 , @xmath367 is defined as a predictable process such that @xmath372 is a ( local ) martingale . hence , it is a matrix with @xmath373 at the @xmath374th row , @xmath160th column . as shown in theorem [ mgc ] , @xmath132 is a martingale with respect to the filtration @xmath225 . counting process martingales like this have compensators : @xmath375 [ see , e.g. , proposition ii.4.1 in andersen et al . ( @xcite ) ] . moreover , if @xmath376 and @xmath377 are ( locally ) bounded @xmath225-predictable processes with values in @xmath378 , then @xmath379 exists and @xmath380 [ proposition ii.4.1 or ( 2.4.9 ) in andersen et al . ( @xcite ) ] . because @xmath381 satisfies restriction [ hreg ] , @xmath382 is a bounded @xmath225-predictable process ( proof just as in lemma [ hpred ] ) . therefore , the theory above leads to @xmath383 for the second statement , notice that , under the conditions of the lemma , @xmath384 and the expectation of the second term here is equal to zero because of theorem [ thec ] . for the third statement , notice that , under the conditions of the lemma , @xmath385 because of the chain rule , and the expectation of the second term is equal to zero because of theorem [ thec ] . this lemma simplifies the asymptotic variance formula of the estimators in equation ( [ asvar ] ) : [ casvar ] suppose that the conditions of theorem hold : assumptions ( bounded intensity process ) , [ @xmath40 cadlag ] , no unmeasured confounding ( no instantaneous treatment effect ) , for every @xmath10 $ ] , @xmath92 has the same distribution as @xmath21 given @xmath15 ( see section ) , for each @xmath99 , @xmath11 jumps at most finitely many times , and @xmath51 satisfies regularity condition . suppose also that @xmath359 is a correctly specified model for @xmath30 such that @xmath360 exists and that @xmath141 is a correctly specified model for @xmath51 such that , for each @xmath7 , @xmath109 is differentiable with respect to @xmath108 at @xmath361 . then if @xmath386 and @xmath362 satisfies restriction [ hregpc ] , the asymptotic variance ( [ asvar ] ) is equal to @xmath387 with @xmath388 and @xmath389 with @xmath390 and , with @xmath365 , @xmath391 we conclude this section with an example to see the machinery work in practice . notice that the boundedness conditions of theorem [ consas ] are somewhat too restrictive for this example , but that the results hold true under these weaker restrictions , too . [ ] [ weilem ] consider the setting of example , and suppose that the assumptions of section [ mgs ] are satisfied . in example @xmath392 where at risk means at risk for initiation of prophylaxis treatment . @xmath109 is the solution to the differential equation @xmath393 with final condition @xmath394 and @xmath395 , so @xmath396 in example [ wei ] we already saw that @xmath397 is a zero of @xmath398 suppose now that @xmath397 is the only zero . suppose , furthermore , that the survival time @xmath1 takes values in a compact space @xmath399\subset\mathbb{r}$ ] and that we know that @xmath400 , with @xmath401 , @xmath402 , @xmath403 and @xmath404 all four compact ( note that this implies that @xmath201 and @xmath202 are bounded away from @xmath24 ) . then any sequence of ( almost ) zeros @xmath405 of @xmath406 that is , any sequence of estimators @xmath405 such that @xmath407 converges in probability to zero , is a consistent estimator for @xmath397 . moreover , @xmath389 as in corollary [ casvar ] exists , and @xmath408 and @xmath409 is a five - dimensional vector with zeros in the first four positions and @xmath410 in the fifth , with @xmath411 if this @xmath337 is a nonsingular matrix , then there exists a sequence of ( almost ) zeros @xmath405 of ( [ weiboh ] ) . furthermore , any such sequence is asymptotically normal : @xmath412 with @xmath337 the matrix above and @xmath413 moreover , @xmath227 and @xmath228 are asymptotically independent . the asymptotic independence here turns out to be no coincidence ; see lok ( @xcite ) . proof of lemma [ weilem ] the findings here are similar to the findings in theorem [ consas ] , but the boundedness conditions fail to hold here . consistency follows from @xcite , theorem 5.9 . existence of a sequence of ( almost ) zeros follows from @xcite , section 3.9 , problem 9 , whose solution is practically given by the hint below it . asymptotic normality follows from @xcite , theorem 5.21 . the asymptotic variance equals @xmath414 because of corollary [ casvar ] ( @xmath30 and @xmath58 are not bounded here , but we can restrict the interval to @xmath215 $ ] for @xmath216 and let @xmath415 ) . we leave checking the conditions of these theorems to the reader [ or see @xcite ( @xcite ) , section 7.7 ] . asymptotic independence of @xmath227 and @xmath228 follows by direct calculation , after noticing that @xmath416 with @xmath417 and @xmath418 define @xmath419 this concludes the proof : @xmath420 we show that one can often test whether treatment affects the outcome of interest without specifying a model @xmath141 for @xmath51 . this was conjectured , but not proved , in @xcite . if one does not have to specify a model for @xmath51 in order to test whether treatment affects the outcome , false conclusions caused by misspecification of the model for @xmath51 can be avoided . under the null hypothesis of the no treatment effect , @xmath89 and @xmath421 ( see section [ model ] ) . if there is no unmeasured confounding , @xmath92 does not predict @xmath26 given @xmath23 ( see theorem [ mgc ] ) . hence , if there is no unmeasured confounding and no treatment effect , adding the _ observed outcome _ @xmath1 to the prediction model for treatment effect should not help the prediction . this idea , presented in @xcite for the case of local rank preservation ( see section [ loc ] ) , can be proven to be correct as follows . technically , the tests in this section are similar to the score test [ for more about the score test see , e.g. , @xcite ( @xcite ) ] . suppose that the conditions of section [ mgs ] are satisfied , and that we have a correctly specified parametric model @xmath359 for @xmath30 . define @xmath422 with @xmath423 satisfying the regularity condition restriction [ hreg ] . the key idea of this procedure is that if treatment does not affect the outcome , @xmath89 , so @xmath421 , and @xmath424 has expectation zero because of theorem [ thec ] . since @xmath118 is unknown , we base the test on the limiting behavior under @xmath89 of @xmath425 , where @xmath227 is an estimator of the nuisance parameter @xmath118 . we will show that if @xmath89 , @xmath425 converges to a normal random variable with expectation zero , which leads to a test for whether @xmath89 in the usual way . the nuisance parameter @xmath118 will be estimated using some set of estimating equations @xmath426 with @xmath427 , @xmath428 differentiable in @xmath117 and @xmath429 . a natural choice would be a maximum ( partial ) likelihood estimator for @xmath118 . we suppose throughout this section that the resulting estimator @xmath227 is consistent and asymptotically normal with @xmath430 as will usually follow from , for example , @xcite , theorem 5.21 . if @xmath116 and @xmath431 are sufficiently smooth , @xmath432 is differentiable with respect to @xmath117 , and a taylor expansion around @xmath118 leads to @xmath433 with @xmath434 the derivative of @xmath435 with respect to @xmath117 and @xmath436 between @xmath118 and @xmath227 . since @xmath227 converges in probability to @xmath118 , so does @xmath436 . therefore , usually , @xmath437 . sufficient conditions under which this holds are given in appendix [ gcap ] , lemma [ pgc ] . because of ( [ thetaas ] ) and the central limit theorem , @xmath438 converges in distribution . therefore , an application of slutzky s lemma leads to @xmath439 with @xmath440 . if @xmath89 , @xmath421 , so that theorem [ thec ] implies that also the expectation of @xmath441 is equal to zero . therefore , the central limit theorem can be applied on the vector with @xmath442 on the right - hand side ; it converges to a normal random variable with expectation zero . because of the continuous mapping theorem [ see , e.g. , @xcite ( @xcite ) , chapter 18 ] , @xmath425 then converges to a normal random variable with expectation zero , too . calculation of its limiting covariance matrix is standard [ see , e.g.,@xcite ( @xcite ) , chapter 18 ] . to save space , we omit that calculation here . if desirable , one can use theorem [ thec ] and lemma [ caslem ] to simplify the expression . notice that a test for whether @xmath443 for any specific @xmath444 can be constructed in exactly the same way . if we have a correctly specified model @xmath141 for @xmath51 , this thus also leads to a confidence region for @xmath119 in the usual way , using the duality between testing and confidence regions : include those @xmath108 for which the null hypothesis @xmath445 is not rejected . the proof of consistency and asymptotic normality of the estimators presented in this article applies to continuous - time structural nested models . a similar proof applies to structural nested models in discrete time ( when covariates are only measured at finitely many fixed times @xmath446 , which are the same for all patients and known in advance ) . @xcite argue without proof that consistency and asymptotic normality should hold for discrete time structural nested models under reasonable assumptions ; the proof is completed with the current article , as follows . it is easy to see that in discrete time , @xmath447 is the compensator of @xmath25 with respect to @xmath29 [ see , e.g. , @xcite ( @xcite ) , section 7.4 ] . the assumption of no unmeasured confounding can be formalized as @xmath448 since @xmath449 given @xmath193 , this implies that also @xmath450 the discrete - time counterparts of theorem [ thec ] and theorem [ mgc ] follow immediately [ see @xcite ( @xcite ) ] . consistency and asymptotic normality follow in the same way as for continuous time models . the tests for treatment effect in this article can be carried out without specifying a model for treatment effect ; that is , no model for @xmath51 is needed . this is an important feature of the tests because it allows one to avoid false conclusions caused by misspecification of the model for @xmath51 . in practice , it may be hard to specify a correct parametric model for the infinitesimal shift - function , @xmath51 . thus , it is good that specification of a model for @xmath51 is not needed to test for treatment effect . the estimators in this article require the correct specification of a model for treatment effect and of a model for prediction of treatment changes . for the discrete - time setting , @xcite has recently proposed estimators which are doubly robust . doubly robust estimators are consistent and asymptotically normal if ( i ) the model for prediction of treatment changes ( @xmath30 in the current article ) is correctly specified or if ( ii ) a regression model of a blipped down outcome [ @xmath109 in the current article ] on past treatment- and covariate history @xmath23 is correctly specified . in any case , the model for treatment effect ( @xmath90 in the current article ) has to be well specified . in this article estimation started with the specification of a model for the infinitesimal shift - function , @xmath51 . interpretation of results may be easier when one starts with a model like ( [ dasim ] ) , @xmath451 , given @xmath452 . here , @xmath65 is the duration of treatment in the interval @xmath66 . the main results in the current article apply also to this model . the proofs for theorems [ thec ] and [ consas ] do not depend on @xmath110 being the solution to @xmath453 . the proof of theorem [ mgc ] does depend on @xmath453 , but it simplifies considerably if ( [ dasim ] ) or ( [ dasim2 ] ) is used as a starting point . let us show this for ( [ dasim ] ) . define @xmath454 . using the first part of the proof of theorem [ mgc ] , for @xmath455 , @xmath285}(t ) 1_{a}(\overline{z}_{t_1})1^{(n)}_{(x_1,x_2)}(\tilde{x}(t_1))\\ & & \qquad=1_{(t_1,t_2]}(t ) 1_{a}(\overline{z}_{t_1})1^{(n)}_{(x_1,x_2)}\bigl(\tilde{x}(t)+\mathit{dur}(t_1,t ) ( -1+e^\psi)\bigr)\\ & & \qquad = h_t^{(n)}(\tilde{x}(t),\overline{z}_{t-}),\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath456 is the duration of treatment in the interval @xmath457 . @xmath458 is measurable if the duration of treatment until @xmath7 is in included in @xmath6 . moreover , if @xmath459 and @xmath127 , then @xmath460 . hence , it follows immediately that @xmath458 satisfies restriction [ hreg ] , which concludes the proof . depending on the specific application , it will be more appropriate to start with @xmath461 given @xmath452 or with a model for @xmath51 ; see , for example , example [ prior ] . in the previous literature [ see , e.g. , robins et al . ( @xcite ) , @xcite , witteman et al . ( @xcite ) , keiding et al . ( @xcite ) and hernn et al . ( @xcite ) ] applications have been carried out under the assumption of local rank preservation , where @xmath148 for each @xmath7 . as pointed out in these papers , and as discussed in section [ loc ] , the assumption of local rank preservation is generally considered implausible . this article relaxes the assumption of local rank preservation in structural nested models . the estimators and tests applied in the previous literature are specific cases of the estimators and tests studied in this article , with the only difference that some of the estimators in the previous literature allow for censoring of @xmath1 . aside from the issue of censoring , this article provides a mathematical foundation behind previous estimators , relaxes the specification of the counterfactual outcomes as deterministic variables , and allows for a distributional interpretation of the estimators . @xcite conjectures that one can often use standard software to test whether treatment affects the outcome of interest ( without specifying a model @xmath90 for @xmath51 ) , and to estimate @xmath108 . lok ( @xcite ) shows that both testing and estimation can also be considered from a partial likelihood point of view . as shown in lok ( @xcite ) , this approach leads to a subclass of the estimators and tests studied in this article which can indeed be calculated with standard software . example [ wei ] is a specific case of that . the possibility to use standard software may be a good reason to choose these estimators in practice . see @xcite and lok ( @xcite ) for a more elaborate discussion . the approach adopted in the current article leads to a large class of estimators and tests . when treatment and covariates change at finitely many fixed times only , robins ( @xcite ) proposes , without proof , an optimal procedure for survival and nonsurvival outcomes , respectively . the optimal choice of estimators or tests under the framework of this article is another intriguing topic for future research . the current article assumes a parametric model @xmath116 for the prediction of treatment changes . in practice , applications have often used a semi - parametric cox model for @xmath116 . @xcite shows that specifying @xmath116 using a semiparametric cox model leads to unbiased estimating equations , which just as in this article are martingales for the true parameters . consistency and asymptotic normality of the resulting estimators for @xmath51 still remain to be shown and constitute interesting topics for future research . in many applications , observations are censored . @xcite and hernn et al . ( @xcite ) have proposed methods to deal with censoring that could potentially be adapted to the results in this paper . for @xmath51 of the form of example [ daexa ] , @xcite includes proofs with censoring due to the fact that the study ends , so - called administrative censoring , using ideas from these previous papers . the estimators in this paper depend on solving a differential equation for each observation . in the examples , these equations are simple enough to be solved analytically . if that is not possible , these equations should be solved numerically . it might be worth investigating how a small contamination of the solution to the differential equation @xmath92 affects the estimates of treatment effect . i conclude with a discussion of the assumptions used in this article . the most important assumption in this article is the assumption of no unmeasured confounding ( assumption [ intconf ] ) . as discussed before , this assumption is valid if all information has been recorded which both ( i ) predicts treatment decisions and ( ii ) is an independent risk factor for the outcome of interest . the validity of the assumption of no unmeasured confounding can not be tested statistically , and depends on the quality of the recorded information . therefore , it is for subject matter experts to decide about the plausibility of the assumption of no unmeasured confounding . second , we only estimate the effect of treatment for which a short duration of treatment has only a small effect on the distribution of the outcome of interest . the effect of the treatment on an individual patient may be large , as long as the probability of such an effect is small for any small duration of treatment . third , the assumption of no instantaneous treatment effect ( assumption [ jump ] ) is also restrictive : it excludes the estimation of the effect of treatments that have instantaneous effects , such as surgery or other point exposures . the remaining assumptions in this article are mostly benign . the assumption that the covariate- and treatment process can be represented by a cadlag process is generally accepted for most medical situations [ see , e.g. , andersen et al . ( @xcite ) ] . the functions @xmath122 and @xmath90 can be chosen such that the regularity conditions on these functions are satisfied . even if @xmath122 is not bounded , it can often be approximated by bounded functions , and results may follow by a simple application of lebesgue s dominated convergence theorem [ see , e.g. , example [ wei ] ] . the same is true for the boundedness condition ( assumption [ int ] ) of the intensity process @xmath30 . assumption [ ycadlag ] that the counterfactual process @xmath21 is cadlag is impossible to verify , but it is a plausible and convenient regularity condition . [ isun ] suppose that a function @xmath76 satisfies the following : ( ) . if @xmath11 does not jump in @xmath239 , then @xmath76 is continuous in @xmath240 on @xmath241 and can be continuously extended to @xmath242 $ ] . ( ) . for each @xmath99 , there exists a constant @xmath462 such that @xmath463 for all @xmath10 $ ] and all @xmath248 . suppose , furthermore , that , for each @xmath99 , there are no more than finitely many jump times of @xmath11 . then , for each @xmath124 $ ] and @xmath125 , there is a unique continuous solution @xmath464 to @xmath465 with boundary condition @xmath466 and this solution is defined on the whole interval @xmath2 $ ] . this theorem follows from well - known results about differential equations ; see , for example , @xcite , chapter 2 . for the next theorem , we also refer to @xcite , chapter 2 . it is a consequence of gronwall s lemma . [ difb ] suppose that @xmath467 is an open or closed interval in @xmath468 , @xmath469 is continuous and @xmath470 is continuous , and suppose that @xmath471 for all @xmath472 and @xmath473 . then , for every @xmath474 and @xmath125 , there is a unique solution @xmath475 of @xmath476 with @xmath477 , and this solution is defined for all @xmath472 . if @xmath478 is continuous and @xmath479 is a solution of @xmath480 , then @xmath481 for all @xmath482 with @xmath483 . in @xcite the interval is always an open interval , but as is generally known , this can be overcome by extending both @xmath484 and @xmath310 outside the closed interval @xmath467 by taking the values at the boundary of @xmath467 . this preserves the lipschitz- and continuity conditions . existence and uniqueness on all of finitely many intervals implies global existence and uniqueness . we have a differential equation with end condition at @xmath3 , so we are interested in @xmath485 with @xmath486 : [ difbc1 ] suppose that the conditions of theorem are satisfied . then , for every @xmath474 and @xmath487 , there is a unique solution @xmath475 of @xmath476 with @xmath477 , and this solution is defined for all @xmath472 . if @xmath478 is continuous and @xmath479 is a solution of @xmath480 , then @xmath488 for all @xmath485 with @xmath486 . proof put @xmath489 . then @xmath490 where @xmath491 . thus , @xmath489 is a solution of the differential equation @xmath492 with boundary condition @xmath493 . define also @xmath494 . applying theorem [ difb ] on @xmath301 concludes the proof , as follows : @xmath495 with @xmath496 notice that , because of equation ( [ lc2 ] ) , @xmath497 with @xmath498 . hence , theorem [ difb ] implies that @xmath499 for the first term , we do a change of variables ; @xmath201 from @xmath24 to @xmath7 , put @xmath500 ; @xmath501 . @xmath502 ; @xmath503 from @xmath504 to @xmath505 . we conclude that the first term is equal to @xmath506 for the second term , similar changes of variables can be done , resulting in corollary [ difbc1 ] . in most of this article we assume that the function which maps @xmath549 to @xmath550 , with @xmath551 , is a measurable function on @xmath123 , with the projection @xmath18-algebra on @xmath552 ( see section [ sets ] ) . moreover , we sometimes assume that the function which maps @xmath553 to @xmath92 , with @xmath551 , is a measurable function on @xmath554 . in this appendix we give sufficient conditions for this . if these two functions are measurable , @xmath233 is a filtration , and , moreover , @xmath233 is the same as @xmath555 [ see equation ( [ fil ] ) in section [ mgs ] ] . [ mtb ] suppose that @xmath51 satisfies regularity assumption and that , for each @xmath99 , @xmath11 jumps at most finitely many times . then the function which maps @xmath549 to @xmath550 , with @xmath551 , is a measurable function from @xmath123 to @xmath378 . also , the function which maps @xmath553 to @xmath92 , with @xmath551 , is a measurable function from @xmath123 to @xmath378 . for the proof of this result , which is quite technical since many results on differential equations are nonconstructive , we refer to @xcite . the proof uses the idea behind euler s forward method to approximate the solution to the differential equation . the following lemma is a worked - out case of theory from @xcite , chapter 19 . [ pgc ] let @xmath556 be i.i.d . random variables with values in a measurable space @xmath557 . let @xmath558 be a collection of measurable functions from @xmath557 to @xmath559 indexed by a subset @xmath560 which contains an open neighborhood @xmath561 of @xmath118 . suppose that @xmath562 is continuous on @xmath561 for every @xmath563 . suppose also that there exists a measurable function @xmath52 on @xmath557 such that @xmath564 for every @xmath565 and such that @xmath566 exists . then if @xmath227 converges in probability to @xmath118 , @xmath567 where @xmath144 indicates the empirical distribution of @xmath568 . proof notice that @xmath569 we show that both terms converge to zero in probability . choose @xmath570 compact and such that it contains an open neighborhood of @xmath118 . example 19.8 from @xcite implies that , under the conditions above , @xmath571 since @xmath572 and @xmath573 contain an open neighborhood of @xmath118 , this implies that the first term converges in probability to zero . for the second term , notice that , on @xmath561 , @xmath574 is continuous in @xmath117 and that each of the components of @xmath575 is bounded by the integrable function @xmath52 , so that lebesgue s dominated convergence theorem implies that @xmath576 is continuous in @xmath117 on @xmath561 . thus , since @xmath572 , also the second term converges in probability to zero . an earlier version of this article was a chapter of my ph.d . dissertation at the free university of amsterdam . i am indebted to richard gill and aad van der vaart for their support , insight and encouragement on this project . i also thank james robins for fruitful discussions . i thank both referees for helpful suggestions . besides that , i thank the netherlands organization for scientific research ( nwo ) for a scholarship . hernn , m. a. , cole , s. r. , margolick , j. , cohen , m. and robins j. m. ( 2005 ) . structural accelerated failure time models for survival analysis in studies with time - varying treatments . _ pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety _ * 14 * 477491 . keiding , n. , filiberti , m. , esbjerg , s. , robins , j. m. and jacobsen , n. ( 1999 ) . the graft versus leukemia effect after bone marrow transplantation : a case study using structural nested failure time models . _ biometrics _ * 55 * 2328 . lok , j. j. , gill , r. d. , van der vaart , a. w. and robins , j. m. ( 2004 ) . estimating the causal effect of a time - varying treatment on time - to - event using structural nested failure time models . _ statist . neerlandica _ * 58 * 271295 . mark , s. d. and robins , j. m. ( 1993 ) . estimating the causal effect of smoking cessation in the presence of confounding factors using a rank preserving structural failure time model . _ statistics in medicine _ * 12 * 16051628 . robins , j. m. ( 1989 ) . the analysis of randomized and non - randomized aids treatment trials using a new approach to causal inference in longitudinal studies . in _ health service research methodology : a focus on aids _ ( l. sechrest , h. freeman and a. bailey , eds . ) 113159 . nchsr , u.s . public health service , washington , dc . robins , j. m. ( 1993 ) . analytic methods for hiv treatment and cofactor effects . in _ methodological issues of aids behavioral research _ ( d. g. ostrow and r. kessler , eds . ) 213287 . plenum press , new york . robins , j. m. ( 2000 ) . robust estimation in sequentially ignorable missing data and causal inference models . in _ proceedings of the american statistical association section on bayesian statistical science _ * 1999 * 610 . robins , j. m. , blevins , d. , ritter , g. and wulfsohn , m. ( 1992 ) . g - estimation of the effect of prophylaxis therapy for pneumocystis carinii pneumonia on the survival of aids patients . _ epidemiology _ * 3 * 319336 . robins , j. m. , rotnitzky , a. and scharfstein , d. o. ( 2000 ) . sensitivity analysis for selection bias and unmeasured confounding in missing data and causal inference models . in _ statistical models in epidemiology the environment and clinical trials _ ( m. e. halloran and d. berry , eds . ) springer , new york . robins , j. m. and wasserman , l. ( 1997 ) . estimation of effects of sequential treatments by reparameterizing directed acyclic graphs . in _ proceedings of the thirteenth conference on uncertainty in artificial intelligence _ ( d. geiger and p. shenoy , eds . ) 409420 . morgan kaufmann , san francisco , ca . witteman , j. c. m. , dagostino , r. b. , stijnen , t. , kannel , w. b. , cobb , j. c. , de ridder , m. a. j. , hofman , a. and robins , j. m. ( 1998 ) . g - estimation of causal effects : isolated systolic hypertension and cardiovascular death in the framingham study . _ american j. epidemiology _ * 148 * 390401 . Abstract:

Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.

Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered . Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video . Paper: in the long theoretical preparation for the lhc , a wide spectrum of options for the new physics at the tev scale has been considered . a major role has been played by supersymmetric models . several schemes have been investigated in which supersymmetry is broken in a hidden sector with no renormalizable interactions with the observable sector and is communicated to the latter by a variety of mechanisms @xcite . below the scale @xmath4 at which supersymmetry breaking is communicated , sfermion masses are typically described by the model - independent effective lagrangian operator @xmath5 where @xmath6 is a standard model ( sm ) singlet hidden chiral superfield whose @xmath7-term vev breaks supersymmetry , @xmath8 , and @xmath9 is a generic light , observable chiral superfield , for example an mssm one . such an effective , supersymmetric description holds if @xmath10 . different models are characterized by different origins for the above operator . surprisingly enough , a simple and attractive possibility has been neglected in the almost three decades of phenomenological studies of supersymmetry : the possibility that the operator in eq . ( [ eq : sfermioneffective ] ) arises from the renormalizable , tree level exchange of heavy vector superfields , as in fig . [ fig : diagram ] . this is the communication mechanism that we call tree level gauge mediation ( tgm ) @xcite . besides its simplicity ( compare for example with the cumbersome set of two loop diagrams generating the operator in eq . ( [ eq : sfermioneffective ] ) in ordinary , loop gauge mediation ) , this framework is also motivated by the necessary presence of superheavy vector fields in grand unified theories ( guts ) . on the verge of the lhc era , we believe it is worth filling this lacuna and spell out the consequences of tgm , also in the light of its peculiar predictions . one may wonder how such a simple possibility could have been missed . the reason might be that well known arguments seem to prevent it . the main obstacle is represented by the supertrace formula @xcite and its consequences . in the context of the tree level , renormalizable spontaneously broken supersymmetric theory underlying fig . [ fig : diagram ] , we must have @xmath11 for the supertrace of the squared masses of the fields in the model . eq . ( [ eq : str ] ) holds separately for each set of conserved quantum numbers @xcite . if the action of the gauge generators on the full set of chiral superfields , @xmath12 , is traceless , as in the case we are going to consider , the supertrace vanishes . this represents a potential phenomenological problem . still , tgm leads to a viable spectrum , as we will see . while the explicit construction in the next sections is all we need to get to our results , we find useful , in this introduction , to review what the potential problem is and illustrate how tree level gauge mediation solves it . we can see the potential problem at two different levels . first , eq . ( [ eq : str ] ) holds in particular when applied to all fields with the quantum numbers of the sm fermions . let us consider then the case of the mssm . in this case the fields with the quantum numbers of the sm fermions are the sm fermions themselves , @xmath13 , and their supersymmetric partners , the sfermions @xmath14 . from @xmath15 we then conclude that the sum of the squared masses of fermions and sfermions should coincide . this is in clear contradiction with the experimental bounds on the sfermion masses , giving @xmath16 . this is however far from being the end of the story , as any realistic complete theory of supersymmetry breaking is likely to involve additional fields on top of the mssm ones . this is the case of our tgm framework , where the positive contribution to the supertrace from the mssm fermions and sfermions is compensated by an opposite contribution from extra fields with quantum numbers within the ones of the sm fermions , @xmath17 , so that @xmath18 , in agreement with the supertrace formula . the extra chiral superfields will get heavy supersymmetric mass terms . their negative contribution to the supertrace is due to the fact that their scalar components get negative @xmath19 soft masses , which however represent only negligible corrections to their much larger , positive supersymmetric mass term . as we will see , this can be obtained without ad hoc model building efforts . the supertrace formula has stronger implications than the ones outlined above , which should also be addressed . let us consider the fields with the @xmath20 quantum numbers of the @xmath21 quarks only . the latter set will contain at least the three down - type sm quarks and their scalar partners and possibly the extra fields we need to compensate the supertrace formula . let us project the supertrace formula in the flavor space of down - type fields along the direction corresponding to the lightest @xmath21-quark mass eigenstate , the down quark . note that when restricted to a given set of quantum numbers , the trace on the right - hand side of eq . ( [ eq : str ] ) can be non - vanishing . assume now that the only u(1 ) factor in the gauge group is the sm hypercharge , @xmath22 . we then obtain @xcite @xmath23 where @xmath24 is the lightest @xmath21-sfermion mass eigenstate , @xmath25 is the down quark mass , @xmath26 , @xmath27 is the hypercharge gauge coupling and @xmath28 the hypercharge @xmath29-term . ( [ eq : constraint ] ) represents a serious phenomenological problem , even in the presence of the extra fields invoked above . if @xmath30 , in fact , eq . ( [ eq : constraint ] ) would force a down sfermion mass to be smaller than about @xmath31 , in contrast with the lowest experimental limits of a few hundreds gev . if @xmath32 , the constraint would be even stronger . if @xmath33 , the constraint would be loosened , but one could repeat the argument for the up quarks and squarks . for which the @xmath28 contribution to the relation analogous to eq . ( [ eq : constraint ] ) would have opposite sign , leading to an even stronger bound for the lightest up squark . in order to bypass this problem , an extra u(1 ) factor , giving the same sign on both down and up fields , is needed . such an extra u(1 ) factor is present `` by definition '' in the tgm scheme . it is the u(1 ) factor associated to the heavy vector exchange in fig . [ fig : diagram ] ( as @xmath6 is a sm singlet , the heavy vector must also be a sm singlet ) . we therefore have all the ingredients needed to overcome the potential problem set by the supertrace formula . as we will see , those ingredients naturally combine in phenomenologically viable schemes . another potential problem is represented by the fact that gaugino masses arise at the loop level and are therefore potentially suppressed with respect to the sfermion masses by a large loop factor , thus pushing the sfermions out of the reach of the lhc and introducing a significant fine - tuning in the determination of the higgs mass . we will list in section [ sec : gauchi ] a number of gaugino mass enhancement factors that can compensate fully or partially that loop factor . a minimal model of tree - level gauge mediation has been presented in @xcite , solving the supersymmetric flavor problem and predicting the ratio of different sfermion masses to be different from msugra and other schemes . in this paper we would like to take a broader point of view and study the general implementation of tgm . this will allow to establish the general properties of tgm , to set up the guidelines for model building and to identify what are the hypotheses under which the peculiar predictions on soft masses of the minimal model hold . moreover , we would like to present a few new approaches to the @xmath3-problem , both in the context of well known ( giudice - masiero , nmssm ) and new solutions . in particular , in section [ sec : tree ] we will discuss what are the conditions under which heavy vector superfields can act as tree - level messengers of supersymmetry breaking and obtain a general expression for the tree level contribution to the supersymmetry breaking lagrangian , in particular to the sfermion soft masses . in section [ sec : oneloop ] , we will consider the one - loop contributions to soft masses , concentrating mostly on gaugino masses and the enhancement factors compensating their loop suppression . in section [ sec : guidelines ] we consider the possibility to obtain a phenomenologically viable model from the general formalism previously introduced . we will see that clear model building guidelines emerge , leading to peculiar predictions for the pattern of mssm sfermion masses and we will identify the assumptions underlying such predictions . in section [ sec : mu ] , we will discuss a few new approaches to the @xmath3-problem , before summarizing in section [ sec : conclusions ] . the paper also contains two appendixes . in appendix a , we outline the procedure to integrate out vector superfields and address a few minor issues , such as the generalization to the non - abelian case and the role of gauge invariance in a consistent supersymmetric generalization of the expansion in the number of derivatives . in appendix b , we provide an example of a superpotential achieving supersymmetry breaking , so(10 ) breaking to the sm , ensuring that only the mssm fields survive at lower energy ( in particular providing doublet - triplet splitting ) and solving the @xmath3-problem . such a superpotential is not aimed at being simple or realistic , but it represents a useful existence proof . in this section we discuss the conditions under which heavy vector superfields can act as tree - level messengers of supersymmetry breaking in the context of a generic , renormalizable , @xmath34 globally supersymmetric gauge theory in four dimensions . then we recover the general expression for the tree level contribution to the sfermion soft masses . we discuss their origin both in the context of the full , renormalizable theory , and in an effective theory approach . we start from a lagrangian described by a canonical khler @xmath35 and gauge kinetic function and by a generic superpotential @xmath36 function of the chiral superfields @xmath37 , with no fayet - iliopoulos term . we follow the conventions in @xcite . we will denote by @xmath38 , @xmath39 , @xmath40 the scalar , spinor , and auxiliary component of @xmath41 and by @xmath42 , @xmath43 , @xmath44 the vector , spinor , and auxiliary component of @xmath45 . the gauge group @xmath46 ( assumed for simplicity to be simple with a single gauge coupling @xmath47 ) is broken by the scalar component vev @xmath48 to the subgroup @xmath49 at a scale @xmath50 , at which the theory is approximately supersymmetric . in the phenomenological applications we have in mind , @xmath49 contains the sm gauge group @xmath51 , @xmath46 is a grand - unified group ( for example so(10 ) or @xmath52 ) , and the breaking scale is of the order of the gut scale . correspondingly , the vector superfields split into light and heavy ones , associated to the orthonormalized generators @xmath53 and @xmath54 respectively : @xmath55 , @xmath56 , @xmath57 . the heavy vector superfields acquire a squared mass matrix given by @xmath58 we choose the basis of heavy generators @xmath59 in such a way that the above mass matrix is diagonal , @xmath60 the heavy vector superfields become massive by eating up a corresponding number of goldstone chiral superfields . it is then convenient to split the chiral superfields as follows @xmath61 where @xmath62 , @xmath63 are the goldstone superfields associated to the generators @xmath59 and @xmath64 , @xmath65 is an orthonormal basis in the space of the `` physical '' chiral fields @xmath66 , @xmath67 . in the supersymmetric limit , @xmath68 is orthogonal to @xmath69 and @xmath69 does not mix with the physical superfields . the physical components of the massive vector superfield @xmath45 are @xmath42 , @xmath43 , @xmath70 , @xmath71 , all with mass @xmath72 . the imaginary part of @xmath73 , the goldstone boson , becomes as usual the longitudinal component of the massive gauge boson @xmath42 and the spinors @xmath70 and @xmath43 pair up in a dirac mass term . this spectrum can be split by supersymmetry breaking corrections , as we will see in section [ sec : gauginovector ] . as for the physical chiral superfields @xmath74 , their supersymmetric mass matrix is given by @xmath75 again , we choose the basis @xmath76 in such a way that the above mass matrix is diagonal and positive , @xmath77 the scalar and fermion components of @xmath66 can be split by supersymmetry breaking corrections , which can also induce a mixing with the scalar and fermion components of the heavy vector superfields . supersymmetry is supposed to be broken at a much lower scale than @xmath78 , where some of the fields @xmath66 get an @xmath7-term , @xmath79 , @xmath80 . as a consequence , @xmath68 satisfies with good approximation the @xmath7-term and @xmath29-term conditions at the scale @xmath78 , @xmath81 and @xmath82 ( see eq . ( [ eq : dh ] ) ) for each @xmath83 . the @xmath7-terms induce a non vanishing vev for the @xmath29-terms @xmath84 of the heavy vector superfields . the stationary condition for the scalar potential @xmath85 , @xmath86 , together with the gauge invariance of the superpotential give @xmath87 with the light @xmath29-terms still vanishing . clearly , only generators @xmath59 that are singlets under the unbroken group @xmath49 can contribute to such @xmath29-term vevs . note also the condition @xmath88 which implies that the goldstone superfields @xmath69 do not get @xmath7-term vevs ( the @xmath29-term condition implies that in the supersymmetric limit they do not get scalar vev either ) . the latter relation also follows from the gauge invariance of the superpotential . in turn , the @xmath29-terms above give rise to tree level soft masses for the scalar components @xmath89 of the chiral superfields @xmath74 @xmath90 provided that both @xmath91 and the scalars @xmath92 are charged under the ( broken ) gauge interaction associated to @xmath59 and provided that @xmath59 is a singlet under @xmath49 . the complete list of tree level soft terms obtained from the gauge dynamics can be more conveniently recovered in the effective theory below @xmath78 . before discussing it , let us observe that this theory must necessarily satisfy the supertrace formula @xmath93 . in the case of the soft terms in eq . ( [ eq : mmd ] ) , this simply follows here from @xmath94 . in particular , the tracelessness condition implies that positive soft masses are accompanied by negative ones in eq . ( [ eq : dhsfermion ] ) . this is a potential phenomenological problem , which has long been considered as an obstacle to models in which supersymmetry breaking terms are generated , as here , at the tree , renormalizable level . however , it has recently been shown @xcite that such a potential problem can be easily solved by adding a large positive supersymmetric mass term to the chiral superfields whose tachyonic nature would be problematic . as mentioned , the generation of the sfermion masses can be conveniently seen in the effective theory below @xmath78 , where the heavy vector and the goldstone chiral superfields have been integrated out . in this theory , the chiral degrees of freedom are the @xmath66 . the gauge group is @xmath49 and it is unbroken ( we neglect electroweak symmetry breaking ) . as a consequence , there is no @xmath29-term contribution to supersymmetry breaking . the scalar masses arise in this context from @xmath7-terms vevs through an effective khler operator , as we will see in a moment . the vector superfields can be integrated out by solving the equations of motion @xmath95 @xcite . in appendix [ sec : eom ] we illustrate the details of such a procedure in a general case , we explicitly write the resulting effective theory at the leading order , and we make a few general remarks on the approximations involved in using @xmath95 and on the role of gauge invariance in a consistent supersymmetric generalization of the expansion in the number of derivatives @xcite . for the present purposes , we are only interested in the terms in the effective lagrangian relevant to ( sizable ) soft supersymmetry breaking . those are the ones following from the effective tree level contribution to the khler potential in eq . ( [ eq : keff2]a ) : @xmath96 where we remind that @xmath66 has no vev in its scalar component . the operator in eq . ( [ eq : dk ] ) can be seen to arise from the diagram on the left - hand side in fig . [ fig : diagram ] . ( 400,130)(-80,-20 ) ( -60,50)(-10,50)46 ( -90,75)(-60,50 ) ( -90,25)(-60,50 ) ( 20,75)(-10,50 ) ( 20,25)(-10,50 ) ( -95,80 ) [ ] @xmath66 ( 27,80 ) [ ] @xmath97 ( -30,62 ) [ ] @xmath85 ( -98 , 28 ) [ ] @xmath98 ( 29 , 28 ) [ ] @xmath66 ( 53,50 ) [ ] @xmath99 ( 120,50)(180,50)46 ( 90,75)(120,50 ) ( 90,25)(120,50 ) ( 210,75)(180,50 ) ( 210,25)(180,50 ) ( 86,80 ) [ ] @xmath6 ( 83 , 28 ) [ ] @xmath100 ( 150,62 ) [ ] @xmath85 ( 218,80 ) [ ] @xmath101 ( 220 , 28 ) [ ] @xmath102 ( 250 , 50 ) [ ] @xmath103 ( 300,20)(300,80)46 ( 330,105)(300,80 ) ( 270,105)(300,80 ) ( 330,-5)(300,20 ) ( 270,-5)(300,20 ) ( 266,108 ) [ ] @xmath6 ( 264 , -3 ) [ ] @xmath100 ( 313,50 ) [ ] @xmath85 ( 339,108 ) [ ] @xmath104 ( 340 , -3 ) [ ] @xmath9 as mentioned , the only possible source of supersymmetry breaking in the effective theory are the @xmath7-term vevs of the chiral superfields @xmath66 . we remind that such @xmath7-term vevs must belong to non - trivial representations of the full group @xmath46 , in order to play a role in tgm . the only terms in the lagrangian containing such @xmath7-term vevs , at the tree level and up to second order in @xmath91 , @xmath105 , and @xmath106 , arise from the superpotential and from the operator in eq . ( [ eq : dk ] ) : @xmath107 where @xmath108 is the superpotential in the effective theory , @xmath109 let us consider the different terms in eq . ( [ eq : treesoft ] ) in turn . the first term in the second line reproduces the contribution to the soft scalar masses in eq . ( [ eq : mmd ] ) . the second term gives rise to an additional contribution , only relevant to superfields that are gauge partners of the goldstino superfield ( and have the same quantum numbers under @xmath49 as some of the generators of @xmath46)-term contribution to the scalar potential using eq . ( [ eq : mixing ] ) below . ] . all in all , we have @xmath110 .\ ] ] note that the soft terms do not actually depend on the gauge coupling or on the normalization of the generators @xmath111 , as @xmath112 is also proportional to @xmath113 . the second term in the first line of eq . ( [ eq : treesoft ] ) is a gauge - generated yukawa interaction with coupling @xmath114 , usually absent in models of supersymmetry breaking . from a phenomenological point of view , such tiny yukawa couplings might play a role in neutrino physics , where they could represent naturally small dirac neutrino yukawa couplings @xcite . finally , the first term in eq . ( [ eq : treesoft ] ) , has to do with the existence of a hidden sector in the effective theory . in the phenomenological applications we have in mind , the light spectrum will contain the mssm chiral superfields , as part of a light , `` observable '' sector . the latter will be charged under the residual gauge group @xmath115 . on the other hand , the supersymmetry breaking superfields do not feel the residual gauge interactions . in the effective theory , therefore , the supersymmetry breaking sector is hidden from the observable sector from the point of view of gauge interactions . in order for the supersymmetry breaking sector to be hidden also from the point of view of superpotential interactions , it is sufficient to make sure that the first term in eq . ( [ eq : treesoft ] ) does not induce a direct coupling between the two sectors . to be more precise , we can write the chiral superfields of the effective theory , @xmath66 , as @xmath116 the superfield @xmath6 is the only one getting an @xmath7-term vev , @xmath117 . its fermion component is the goldstino and therefore @xmath6 is a massless eigenstate of the mass matrix @xmath118 in eq . ( [ eq : mc0 ] ) . the remaining mass eigenstates are divided in two groups , the heavy ones , @xmath119 with masses @xmath120 , and the light , or observable , ones @xmath121 , with masses @xmath122 . in order to hide supersymmetry breaking from the observable sector also from the point of view of superpotential interactions , we require that @xmath123 ( at least for the renormalizable part of the superpotential ) . we can then see supersymmetry breaking as arising in a hidden sector and then communicated from the to the observable sector by the diagrams on the right - hand side of fig . [ fig : diagram ] . this can perhaps be considered as the simplest way to communicate supersymmetry breaking : through the tree level renormalizable exchange of a heavy gauge messenger . since heavy gauge messengers at a scale not far from the planck scale are automatically provided by grand - unified theories , this possibility is not only simple but also well motivated . the reason why it has not been pursued in the past is an apparent obstacle arising from the supertrace theorem that , as mentioned , can be easily evaded by providing heavy , supersymmetric masses to some of the superfields . such mass terms can naturally arise in the context of grand - unified theories , as we will see . we end this section with some comments on integrating out heavy chiral superfields and on the corresponding possible tree level contributions to @xmath124-terms and soft scalar masses . the heavy vector superfields may not be the only fields living at the scale @xmath78 , as chiral superfields could have mass terms of similar size or get it after gauge symmetry breaking . such chiral fields should also be integrated out in order to get the effective theory below the scale @xmath78 . in general , we want to integrate out all the heavy chiral superfields @xmath125 . since their masses @xmath126 are assumed to be much larger than the supersymmetry breaking scale , it will still be possible to write the effective theory in a manifestly supersymmetric way . in order to integrate them out , let us write the superpotential as @xmath127 where @xmath128 is at least trilinear in its argument . the equations of motion @xmath129 give @xmath130 the effective superpotential for the light fields @xmath6 and @xmath9 is therefore @xmath131 a contribution to the effective khler is also induced @xmath132 the effective contributions to the superpotential and to the khler in eqs . ( [ eq : weff ] ) and ( [ eq : keffchiral ] ) may give rise to `` chiral - mediated '' tree - level @xmath124-terms and ( negative ) additional contributions to soft scalar masses respectively . the latter should be subleading with respect to the ( positive ) vector mediated contributions in eq . ( [ eq : mm ] ) , at least in the case of the mssm sfermions . such tree level contributions could only arise in the presence of trilinear superpotential couplings in the form @xmath133 . in the following we will consider the case in which such a coupling is absent , @xmath134 so that the chiral - mediated tree tree level contributions also vanish . this is often the case , as illustrated by the model in @xcite . in this section we consider the one loop contributions to soft masses , focusing mostly on gaugino masses and the enhancement factors compensating their loop suppression . gaugino masses do not arise at the tree level . they are however generated at the one - loop level , as in standard , `` loop '' gauge mediation models . the suppression of gaugino masses by a loop factor with respect to scalar masses represents a potential phenomenological problem . given the present experimental limits on gaugino masses , a loop factor enhancement would make the sfermions heavier than @xmath135 , beyond the reach of the lhc and heavy enough to introduce a serious fine - tuning problem , thus approaching the split supersymmetry regime @xcite . however , it turns out that the loop hierarchy between gaugino and scalar soft masses is typically reduced or eliminated , as we will see in this section . we calculate gaugino masses in the full theory above @xmath78 . there are two types of one loop diagrams contributing to gaugino masses , depending on whether the degrees of freedom running in the loop are components of the heavy vector superfields ( including the goldstone superfields ) , as in fig . [ fig : mg]a , or physical chiral superfields , as in fig . [ fig : mg]b . correspondingly , we will distinguish a `` vector '' and a `` chiral '' contribution to the light gaugino masses , @xmath136 the latter may easily dominate on the former , as we will see . the source of supersymmetry breaking entering the diagrams of fig . [ fig : mg]a and 2b is a tree level splitting among the components of the heavy vector and chiral superfields respectively . we now examine the two contributions in eq . ( [ eq : gauginos ] ) in turn and write the known results @xcite in a form general enough to be suitable for the following discussion of their quantitative importance compared to the tree level scalar soft terms . ( 200,100)(50,5 ) ( 150,50)(40,180,360)38 ( 150,50)(40,0,45 ) ( 150,50)(40,90,45 ) ( 150,50)(40,180,135 ) ( 150,50)(40,90,135 ) ( 70,50)(110,50 ) ( 230,50)(190,50 ) ( 68,50)[r]@xmath137 ( 232,50)[l]@xmath138 ( 152,25)[t]@xmath139 ( 146,94)(154,86 ) ( 154,94)(146,86 ) ( 110,65)[r]@xmath140 ( 192,65)[l]@xmath140 ( 130,90)[r]@xmath141 ( 174,90)[l]@xmath141 ( 152,98)[b]@xmath142 ( 151,-10)[b]@xmath143 ( 200,100)(50,5 ) ( 150,50)(40,180,360)3 ( 150,50)(40,90,0 ) ( 150,50)(40,90,180 ) ( 70,50)(110,50 ) ( 230,50)(190,50 ) ( 68,50)[r]@xmath137 ( 232,50)[l]@xmath137 ( 150,25)[t]@xmath144 ( 146,94)(154,86 ) ( 154,94)(146,86 ) ( 115,75)[r]@xmath141 ( 190,75)[l]@xmath141 ( 152,98)[b]@xmath142 ( 151,-10)[b]@xmath143 + ( 300,100)(0,-10 ) ( 150,50)(40,180,360)3 ( 150,50)(40,90,0 ) ( 150,50)(40,90,180 ) ( 70,50)(110,50 ) ( 230,50)(190,50 ) ( 68,50)[r]@xmath137 ( 232,50)[l]@xmath137 ( 146,14)(154,6 ) ( 154,14)(146,6 ) ( 115,75)[r]@xmath141 ( 190,75)[l]@xmath141 ( 113,25)[r]@xmath145 ( 188,25)[l]@xmath145 ( 151,28)[t]@xmath146 ( 151,-10)[b]@xmath147 in the supersymmetric limit , the fields @xmath42 , @xmath43 , @xmath70 , @xmath71 form a massive vector multiplet with mass @xmath72 . once supersymmetry is broken , this spectrum is split by corrections to the fermion and scalar masses , which may also mix them with the components of the physical chiral superfields . here , we are interested to the supersymmetry breaking fermion mass term in the form @xmath148 , which is the source of the vector contribution to gaugino masses through the diagrams in fig . [ fig : mg]a . the mass term @xmath149 vanishes in the supersymmetric limit because of the gauge invariance of @xmath150 . the situation is different in the presence of supersymmetry breaking , when the gauge invariance of @xmath150 gives @xmath151 note also the more general expression for the mixed supersymmetry breaking terms @xmath152 before showing the expression for the gaugino masses induced by @xmath153 , let us remind that the heavy vector representation is in general reducible , under the unbroken gauge group @xmath49 , to a set of irreducible components , each with a single value of the mass . let us call @xmath154 the value of the mass in the representation @xmath155 and denote @xmath156 if @xmath59 , @xmath54 belong to the representation @xmath155 . in the limit @xmath157 , the supersymmetry breaking source @xmath153 can be treated as a perturbation in the one loop computation of gaugino masses . at the leading order in @xmath153 , the diagram in fig . [ fig : mg]a generates a contribution to light gaugino masses given by @xmath158 where @xmath159 is the dynkin index of the representation @xmath160 of the generator @xmath111 . the above contribution to gaugino masses arises at the scale @xmath78 where the heavy vectors live . let us now discuss the relevance of the above contribution to gaugino masses . first , let us note that in order for @xmath161 to be non - vanishing we need the following two conditions to be verified at the same time @xmath162 as it can be seen from eqs . ( [ eq : dmvector ] ) and ( [ eq : fgauge ] ) . in particular , we need at least one irreducible ( under the full group @xmath46 ) chiral superfield multiplet to get vev in both its scalar and @xmath7 components . at the same time , we need @xmath163 in order for the tree level contribution to scalar masses to be generated . the conditions in eqs . ( [ eq : con1],[eq : con2 ] ) may force the vector contribution to gaugino masses to vanish . on top of that , @xmath161 is always suppressed by a loop factor @xmath164 compared to the typical scalar mass in eq . ( [ eq : mm ] ) . if @xmath161 was the only contribution to gaugino masses , this would lead to an hierarchy between gaugino and scalar soft masses . moreover , the present experimental lower limits on gaugino masses , @xmath165 , would force the sfermion masses to be heavier than @xmath135 . however , as we will see in a moment , the chiral contribution to gaugino masses can be significantly larger than the vector contribution , thus reducing or even eliminating the loop suppression with respect to soft scalar masses . in this case , the vector contribution to gaugino masses typically ends up to be subdominant . the chiral contribution to gaugino masses arises from the one loop diagram in fig . [ fig : mg]b , as in ordinary loop gauge mediation . the scalar and fermion components of the chiral superfields entering the loop are split by a supersymmetry breaking scalar mass term @xmath166 . as a consequence of eqs . ( [ eq : hide ] ) and ( [ eq : pure ] ) , the supersymmetry breaking couples directly only to the heavy chiral fields and @xmath146 can be treated as a perturbation in the calculation of gaugino masses . the mass term @xmath146 is then given by @xmath167 which adds to the supersymmetric scalar mass term @xmath168 ( in the notation of eq . ( [ eq : mc0diag ] ) ) . the physical chiral superfield representation under the unbroken gauge group @xmath49 is in general reducible to a set of irreducible components , each with its own mass @xmath169 . let us denote @xmath170 at the leading order in @xmath146 , the diagram in fig . [ fig : mg]b generates a contribution to light gaugino masses given by @xmath171 each of the contributions in the sum in the rhs of eq . ( [ eq : gauginochiral ] ) arises at at the scale @xmath169 at which the corresponding chiral superfield lives . if the heavy chiral superfields split in two conjugated representations @xmath172 with a mass term in the form @xmath173 , eq . ( [ eq : gauginochiral ] ) still holds with @xmath174 and a factor 2 multiplying the rhs . let us now discuss the size of the typical chiral contribution to gaugino masses @xmath175 and compare it with the typical size of the tree level scalar soft masses @xmath176 in eq . ( [ eq : mm ] ) . let us consider for simplicity the case in which the scalar masses are due to the exchange of a single heavy vector and the irreducible ( under @xmath49 ) components of the physical chiral superfields have definite charges @xmath177 under the corresponding generators . as for the dynamics giving rise to gaugino masses , let us assume that there are no bare mass terms in the superpotential , i.e. @xmath178 . then both @xmath179 and @xmath180 arise from the same trilinear term in @xmath36 . under the above assumptions , we have @xmath181 where @xmath9 is the charge of the scalar acquiring the mass @xmath182 . while the loop factor @xmath164 suppresses @xmath175 compared to @xmath182 by a @xmath183 factor , the expressions in eqs . ( [ eq : comparison ] ) may give rise to several enhancements of @xmath184 reducing or even eliminating the loop hierarchy : * in the context of grand unified theories the heavy vectors contributing to the soft scalar masses are either one ( as in the case of the minimal possibility so(10 ) , see section [ sec : guidelines ] ) or a few , unless the unified group is very large . on the other hand , the gaugino masses may always get contribution from several chiral messengers . * sfermion and gaugino masses depend on different group factors . sfermions can get a mild suppression if @xmath185 . this is indeed what turns out to happen in simple models , as we will see in section [ sec : guidelines ] . * the heavy vector masses whose exchange generates @xmath182 collect all the vevs breaking the corresponding charge @xmath9 . the scalar mass @xmath182 is therefore suppressed by all such vevs . on the other hand , gaugino masses are only suppressed by the vevs related to supersymmetry breaking by superpotential interactions @xmath186 . unless some of then have @xmath187 , the vevs suppressing gaugino masses will be a subset of the vevs suppressing scalar masses , thus leading to an enhancement of gaugino masses . in the presence of an hierarchy between the vevs related to supersymmetry breaking and some of the other , @xmath9-breaking vevs , this enhancement can be quite large . * different couplings @xmath186 can appear in the numerator and denominator of the expression @xmath188 . this is likely to be the case as a consequence of the relation @xmath189 , which can be satisfied without the need of cancellations only in the case in which the fields charged under @xmath9 do not have vevs in both the @xmath7 and scalar components . if the couplings appearing in the numerator and the denominator are hierarchical , gaugino masses can be sizably enhanced ( or , in this case , further suppressed ) . the study of simple models shows that indeed the enhancement factors above can naturally arise ( see section [ sec:1610 ] below and @xcite ) . in particular , the first two factors reduce the hierarchy @xmath184 by factors 3 and @xmath190 respectively . the third factor gives at least a factor @xmath191 enhancement . the @xmath183 hierarchy arising from the loop factor is thus reduced by a factor 10 , which is enough to bring the sfermions within the reach of the lhc . such a milder hierarchy may even be necessary in the light of the bounds on the higgs mass , which require the stops not to be too light . still , the residual @xmath192 hierarchy can then be easily fully eliminated by the remaining two factors in the above list . besides gaugino masses , which can be seen to arise from one loop corrections to the gauge kinetic function , a number of soft terms can be generated or get a contribution from the one - loop corrections to the khler . the latter can be computed by using the general results in @xcite , which give @xmath193 - 2 \operatorname{tr}\left [ m^2_v \left ( \log \frac{m^2_v}{\lambda^2 } - 1 \right ) \right ] \right ] , \ ] ] where @xmath194 are functions of the chiral superfields , @xmath195 is our canonical khler @xmath196 and the indexes run on the heavy vector and chiral superfields . as in the case of gaugino masses , the soft terms might get a contribution from both heavy vector and chiral superfields running in the loop . as the contribution to one loop soft terms are highly model dependent , we just remind and collect their general expression in terms of @xmath197 . let us expand @xmath197 in terms of powers of @xmath9 and @xmath6 around @xmath68 . the relevant terms are @xmath198 where @xmath199 , @xmath200 , are hermitian , @xmath201 , @xmath202 symmetric and all are dimensionful . we have omitted @xmath203 terms , which are well - known to destabilize the hierarchy @xcite . their absence can be ensured for example by requiring that there are no light chiral fields with the same quantum numbers as @xmath6 . the first term @xmath199 gives rise to the following `` @xmath124-terms '' @xmath204 ( and to a two loop contribution to scalar soft masses ) , where @xmath205 is the scalar component of @xmath9 . the second term @xmath201 generates a contribution to the `` @xmath3-term '' in the superpotential @xmath206 and the fourth term @xmath202 a contribution to the `` @xmath207-term '' @xmath208 a more comprehensive discussion of the @xmath3-term and the @xmath3 problem can be found in section [ sec : mu ] . finally , @xmath200 gives 1-loop contributions to soft scalar masses @xmath209 that add to the tree level contributions in eq . ( [ eq : mm ] ) . additional one - loop contributions to soft scalar masses can come from an induced 1-loop fayet - iliopoulos term @xcite associated for example to the heavy @xmath49-singlet generators , in particular to those involved in the mediation of supersymmetry breaking at the tree level . such terms vanish if the heavy chiral mass matrix and the matrix of their couplings to the spurion @xmath6 are diagonal in the same basis ( in which case the condition in eq . ( [ eq : pure ] ) is also automatically satisfied ) or if the latter matrix of couplings is hermitian in one basis in which the mass matrix is diagonal @xcite . this completes the list of the soft terms arising at one loop . two loop corrections to the scalar soft masses can also arise , of course , as in standard loop gauge mediation , and be sizable in the presence of an enhancement of one - loop gaugino masses @xcite . we now consider the possibility to obtain a phenomenologically viable model from the general formalism discussed so far . we will see that clear model building guidelines emerge from this analysis , leading , in economical schemes , to peculiar predictions for the pattern of mssm sfermion masses . in particular , we will identify the assumptions underlying such predictions . in a phenomenologically viable model , the unbroken gauge group @xmath49 should contain the sm group , @xmath210 , and the light superfield content should contain the mssm spectrum , @xmath211 , in standard notations , where @xmath212 is the family index . we assume that the full gauge group @xmath46 is a simple , grand - unified group , motivated by the well known successful predictions of the sm fermion gauge quantum numbers , of the strong coupling in the mssm , and of the unification scale in the phenomenologically allowed region . the candidates for the unified group @xmath46 in a four - dimensional theory are su(@xmath213 ) , @xmath214 , so(4@xmath215 + 2 ) , @xmath216 , and the exceptional group @xmath52 @xcite . in the following we will focus on the smallest ( or unique ) representatives of each class , su(5 ) , so(10 ) , and @xmath52 . we want the mssm sfermions to get a positive , @xmath217 mass through tree level gauge mediation . the general form of such mass terms is given in eq . ( [ eq : mm ] ) . the latter contains two contributions , corresponding to the two diagrams on the right - hande side in fig . [ fig : diagram ] . in order for the second contribution to play a role for sfermion masses , the corresponding chiral superfields should live in the same unified multiplet as the supersymmetry breaking source @xmath6 . this will not be the case in the models we consider ( as a consequence , for example , of a matter parity telling the supersymmetry breaking multiplet from the matter ones ) . on the other hand , the second contribution might contribute to the higgs masses , if some of the gauge generators have the same quantum numbers ( which is not the case in so(10 ) , the unified group we will consider in greater detail ) . the mssm sfermions then get their tree level soft masses from the first term in eq . ( [ eq : mm ] ) only . in order for @xmath218 to be non - vanishing , the heavy generator @xmath59 must be a sm singlet , since @xmath91 is . we therefore need a group @xmath46 with rank 5 at least . this means that su(5 ) can not give rise to tree level gauge mediation , while so(10 ) and @xmath52 are in principle suitable . let us first consider the `` minimal '' option , so(10 ) , which has also the well known virtue to be able to accommodate a whole mssm family in a single irreducible spinorial representation . we will make a few considerations on the @xmath52 option at the end of this section . in so(10 ) there is exactly one ( up to a sign ) ortho - normalized heavy sm - singlet generator , @xmath219 , where @xmath220 is the su(5 ) invariant so(10 ) generator . the quantum numbers of the so(10 ) representations with dimension @xmath221 under @xmath222 are given in table [ tab : x ] . @xmath223 the values of the @xmath222 quantum numbers are crucial because the soft terms turn out to be proportional to those charges . from eq . ( [ eq : mm ] ) we obtain in fact @xmath224 where @xmath225 is the @xmath222-charge of the sfermion @xmath14 and @xmath78 is the mass if the vector superfield associated to the generator @xmath222 ( note that the gauge coupling and the normalization of the generator @xmath226 cancel in eq . ( [ eq : mmf ] ) ) . in order to predict the pattern of the tree level sfermion masses , we then just need to specify the embedding of the three mssm families into so(10 ) , which we will do through their su(5 ) embedding into three light @xmath227 , @xmath212 . we use two constraints to determine the embedding of the @xmath228 into so(10 ) representations . the first one is related to quite a nice feature eq . ( [ eq : mmf ] ) : the soft terms turn out to be family - universal , thus neatly solving the supersymmetric flavor problem . provided , of course , that the three families of each of the mssm matter multiplets are embedded in the same type of so(10 ) representation , which we will assume in order to ensure that family - universality indeed holds . on top of that , we want the mssm sfermion soft masses in eq . ( [ eq : mmf ] ) to be positive in order to avoid spontaneous symmetry breaking of color , electric charge , or lepton number at the scale @xmath182 . clearly , the standard embedding of a whole family into a 16 of so(10 ) would not work , as it would lead to negative masses for the sfermions in either the @xmath229 or the 10 of su(5 ) . this is in turn related to the tracelessness of the so(10 ) generators , and in particular of @xmath222 . as a consequence , whatever is the so(10 ) representation in which we choose to embed a given mssm matter multiplet with positive soft mass , that representation will necessarily contain extra fields with negative soft masses . this apparent obstacle can be easily overcome by splitting the so(10 ) representation containing the mssm multiplet through so(10 ) breaking , in such a way that the extra fields with negative soft masses acquire a large supersymmetric mass term . the negative soft mass will then represent a negligible supersymmetry breaking correction to that large ( positive ) mass . it turns out that such a splitting is actually expected to arise , as will see , a fact that reinforces the logical consistency of tree level gauge mediation . we are now ready to discuss the embeddings of the three @xmath230 and @xmath231 of su(5 ) containing the light mssm families in so(10 ) . as @xmath232 is positive , the possible choices depend on the sign of @xmath233 . we limit ourselves to the so(10 ) representations with @xmath221 , as in table [ tab : x ] . there are then only two possibilities : * @xmath234 . in this case we need to embed the @xmath230 s and @xmath231 s into so(10 ) representations containing @xmath235 and @xmath236 of su(5 ) with positive charges under @xmath222 . from table [ tab : x ] we see that the only possibility is to use three @xmath237 and three @xmath238 , @xmath212 , where we have explicitly indicated the su(5 ) decomposition , and to embed the @xmath231 s into the @xmath239 s , @xmath240 , and the @xmath230 s into the @xmath241 s , @xmath242 . the spare components @xmath243 , @xmath244 get negative soft masses and need to acquire a large supersymmetric mass term . * @xmath245 . in this case we need the @xmath230 s and @xmath231 s to have negative charges under @xmath222 . the only possibility is then to use three @xmath239 s as before and three @xmath246 , @xmath212 , with @xmath247 and @xmath248 . the spare components @xmath249 , @xmath250 , get negative or vanishing soft masses and need to acquire a large supersymmetric mass term . in both cases the chiral content of the theory is still given by three 16 of so(10 ) . we have implicitly neglected the possibility of mixed embeddings in which , for example , the @xmath251 s of su(5 ) are a superposition of the @xmath251 s in the @xmath241 s and @xmath239 s of so(10 ) . while this possibility is in principle not excluded , it would in general introduce a dependence of the sfermion soft masses on mixing parameters that are in general flavor violating , thus possibly spoiling the flavor universality result . the two possibilities above give rise to two definite predictions for the patter of sfermion soft masses at the scale @xmath78 : @xmath252 m^2_{\overline{5 } } = 2 m^2_{10 } \quad\text{if } \quad f_0^\dagger x f^{\phantom{\dagger}}_0>0 \\ m^2_{\overline{5 } } = \frac{3}{4 } m^2_{10 } \quad\text{if } \quad f_0^\dagger x f^{\phantom{\dagger}}_0<0 . \notag\end{gathered}\ ] ] to summarize , the latter predictions are based on the following hypotheses : `` minimal '' unified gauge group so(10 ) , embedding of the mssm families in the so(10 ) representations with dimension @xmath221 not containing the goldstino , and absence of mixed embeddings to automatically preserve flavor - universality . the predictions on the ratios @xmath253 in eq . ( [ eq : prediction ] ) are peculiar enough to make a possible experimental test at the lhc a strong hint for tree level gauge mediation . as for the source of supersymmetry breaking , @xmath117 , we need @xmath6 to have a non - vanishing charge under @xmath222 . if we limit ourselves again to representations with @xmath221 , the only possibility is that @xmath6 has a component in the `` right - handed neutrino '' direction of a 16 or a @xmath254 . with the sign conventions we adopted , a component in a 16 gives a positive contribution to @xmath233 , while a component in a @xmath254 gives a negative contribution . we now want to show that the two embeddings of the light mssm families described above can be obtained in a natural way . we have to show that it is possible to split the so(10 ) representations in which the mssm fields are embedded in such a way that the extra fields ( with negative soft masses ) get a heavy supersymmetric mass term from so(10 ) breaking . it will turn out that the so(10 ) breaking vevs of a @xmath255 , essential to break so(10 ) to the sm ( unless representations with @xmath256 are used to reduce the rank ) just provide the needed splitting . the fact that such vevs make heavy precisely the components of the so(10 ) representations that get a negative soft supersymmetry breaking mass reinforces the logical consistency of this framework . in the following , we first discuss the @xmath257 embedding in a general , top - bottom perspective , obtaining a generalization of the model in @xcite , and discuss the conditions for a pure ( non mixed ) embedding . we then discuss the possibility of a @xmath258 embedding . let us consider the embedding associated to the case @xmath259 . we assume the existence of a matter parity symmetry that tells matter superfields from higgs superfields . let 16 , @xmath254 be the so(10 ) multiplets breaking so(10 ) to su(5 ) ( we can always choose the basis in the space of the 16 ( @xmath254 ) representations in which a single 16 ( @xmath254 ) gets a vev in its scalar component ) . the most general renormalizable superpotential involving 16 , @xmath254 , @xmath239 , @xmath241 , @xmath212 , and invariant under a matter parity under which the so(10 ) higgs fields 16 , @xmath254 are even and the the matter fields are odd is @xmath260 where @xmath261 takes care of providing a vev to the 16 , @xmath254 in the sm - singlet direction and does not depend on the matter fields ( but can involve additional even fields , where @xmath222 is an so(10 ) singlet . ] ) . the term @xmath262 is just what needed to split the su(5 ) components of the @xmath237 and of the @xmath238 and make heavy the unwanted components @xmath243 and @xmath263 . once 16 acquires a vev @xmath85 in its singlet neutrino component , in fact , a mass term is generated for those components , @xmath264 the singlet neutrinos @xmath265 remain light at the renormalizable level but can get a mass at the non - renormalizable level through the operator @xmath266 . it is remarkable that the components acquiring a large mass are precisely those that get a negative soft mass term . on the other hand , this is only true in the limit in which the @xmath267 mass term in eq . ( [ eq : w1 ] ) can be neglected . in the presence of a non negligible @xmath267 , in fact , the full mass term would be @xmath268 which would give rise to a mixed embedding of the light @xmath230 s in the @xmath239 s and @xmath241 s . in order to abide to our assumptions , which exclude the possibility of mixed embeddings , such a @xmath267 term should be absent . this can be easily forced by means of an appropriate symmetry . let us however relax for a moment that assumption in order to quantify the deviation from universality associated to a small , but non - negligible @xmath267 . the mssm sfermions in the @xmath235 of su(5 ) receive in this case two contributions to their soft mass , a positive one associated to the components in the @xmath241 s , proportional to @xmath269 , and a negative one associated to the components in the @xmath239 s , proportional to @xmath270 . the soft mass matrix for the light sfermions in the @xmath235 of su(5 ) can be easily calculated in the limit in which the @xmath267 mass term can be treated as a perturbation . in this limit , the light mssm fields in the @xmath235 of su(5 ) are in fact @xmath271 and their soft scalar mass matrix at the scale @xmath78 is @xmath272 where @xmath176 is defined below . the mixed embedding induced by the mass term @xmath267 leads to flavor - violating soft - terms . setting @xmath273 allows to preserve the flavor blindness of the soft terms and to satisfy the fcnc constraints without the need of assumptions on the structure of the flavor matrices @xmath274 and @xmath267 . we therefore assume that @xmath267 is vanishing or negligible . we then have @xmath275 , @xmath276 , with the extra components @xmath243 and @xmath244 obtaining a large supersymmetric mass term @xmath277 , as desired . the soft masses for the light sfermions are [ eq : prediction1 ] @xmath278 as anticipated in eq . ( [ eq : prediction ] ) . the reason for the factor @xmath279 will become clear in a moment . we now need to identify the embedding of the mssm higgs superfields and obtain the mssm superpotential for them , in particular the mssm yukawa interactions . it is useful to discuss the yukawa interaction in su(5 ) language . the up quark yukawa interactions arise from the su(5 ) operator @xmath280 where @xmath281 contains the mssm up higgs . as @xmath276 , the operator in eq . ( [ eq : l1 ] ) can arise at the renormalizable level from a so(10 ) invariant operator only if @xmath281 has a component into a @xmath282 of so(10 ) , @xmath283 , with @xmath284 where @xmath285 measures the size of the @xmath281 component from 10 representations of so(10 ) ( a basis in the space of the 10 representations can always be chosen such that @xmath281 is contained in a single one , the @xmath282 ) . the operator in eq . ( [ eq : l1 ] ) will then originate as @xmath286 the down quark and charged lepton yukawa interactions arise at the renormalizable level from the su(5 ) operator @xmath287 where @xmath288 contains the mssm down higgs . as @xmath276 and @xmath275 , the operator in eq . ( [ eq : l2 ] ) can arise at the renormalizable level from a so(10 ) invariant operator only if @xmath288 has a component into a @xmath289 of so(10 ) , @xmath290 , with @xmath291 where @xmath292 measures the size of the @xmath288 component from 16 representations of so(10 ) . the operator in eq . ( [ eq : l2 ] ) will then originate as @xmath293 it is tempting ( and economical ) to identify the @xmath289 with 16 , the field whose vev breaks so(10 ) to su(5 ) , in which case @xmath294 and the mass of the heavy extra components @xmath243 and @xmath244 in eq . ( [ eq : unwanted1 ] ) turns out to be proportional to the corresponding light fermion masses ( up to non - renormalizable corrections needed to fix the light fermion mass ratios ) . having introduced the mssm higgs fields , let us now discuss their soft mass terms . to summarize the previous discussion , with our @xmath221 representation content , the up ( down ) higgs superfield @xmath295 ( @xmath296 ) can be embedded in either 10 s or 16 s ( @xmath254 s ) of so(10 ) , in both cases through the embedding into a @xmath281 ( @xmath288 ) of su(5 ) . we have denoted by @xmath285 ( @xmath297 ) the overall size of the @xmath295 ( @xmath296 ) component in the 10 s . the overall size of the component in the 16 s ( @xmath254 s ) is then measured by @xmath298 ( @xmath292 ) . correspondingly , the higgs soft masses get two contributions from the first term in eq . ( [ eq : mmf ] ) proportional to two different @xmath222 charges : [ eq : mmh ] @xmath299 let us now consider gaugino masses . a general discussion of all possible contributions to gaugino masses in the embedding we are considering and in the presence of an arbitrary number of so(10 ) representation with @xmath221 would be too involved . we then consider a few examples meant to generalize the case considered in @xcite and to illustrate the general properties discussed in section [ sec : oneloop ] . let us begin by illustrating in more detail the structure of supersymmetry breaking . with the representation content of table [ tab : x ] , supersymmetry breaking can be associated to the @xmath7-term vevs of superfields in 16 , @xmath254 , 45 , 54 representations ( the ones containing sm singlets ) . however , only the 16 , @xmath254 , whose singlets have non - vanishing @xmath222-charges , can contribute to tree level soft masses . let us call @xmath300 , @xmath301 the matter parity even superfields in the 16 and @xmath254 representations of so(10 ) . in a generic basis , we can parametrize the vevs of their singlet components as @xmath302 the @xmath29-term condition for the @xmath222 generator requires @xmath303 while gauge invariance gives @xmath304 sfermion masses are proportional to @xmath305 ( due to the factor 5 in the definition of @xmath176 ) , where @xmath306 by definition in the case we are considering . note that @xmath176 is suppressed by _ all _ vevs contributing to @xmath222 breaking . let us now comment on the vector contribution to gaugino masses . let us assume to begin with that the @xmath254 s do not break supersymmetry . without loss of generality we can then assume that supersymmetry breaking is only associated to @xmath307 . the gauge invariance condition then gives @xmath308 , i.e. a vev for both the @xmath7-term and scalar components is not allowed . since the @xmath7-term and scalar components belong to different irreducible representations , no vector contribution to gaugino masses is generated by the 16 s . a vector contribution can still be generated by the @xmath7-term vev of a 45 , for example , for which the gauge invariance condition does now prevent a vev in both the scalar and @xmath7-term component . or , it can be generated by the @xmath7-terms of the 16 s if some of the @xmath254 also breaks supersymmetry and cancels the contribution of the 16 to eq . ( [ eq : gaugeinv ] ) . let us next consider the chiral contribution to gaugino masses . the massive components @xmath243 and @xmath263 of the matter superfields will act as chiral messengers if they are coupled to supersymmetry breaking . let us then consider as before the case in which the @xmath254 s do not break supersymmetry , supersymmetry breaking is provided by the @xmath7-term vev @xmath7 of the singlet component of the @xmath309 and is felt by the chiral messengers through the @xmath310 interaction . let @xmath311 be the field whose vev gives mass to the @xmath243 , @xmath263 through the @xmath262 interaction , as in eq . ( [ eq : w1 ] ) . and let us assume that additional @xmath300 s and @xmath301 s get vevs in their scalar components . the chiral messengers @xmath243 , @xmath263 have therefore a supersymmetric mass @xmath312 and their scalar components get a supersymmetry breaking term mass term @xmath313 . the induced one loop chiral contribution to gaugino masses is then @xmath314 the tree level soft mass of the stop ( belonging to the 10 of su(5 ) ) is @xmath315 we can then compare stop and gaugino masses ( before radiative corrections ) . their ratio is particularly interesting , as the gaugino mass @xmath175 is at present bounded to be heavier than about @xmath316 , while @xmath317 enters the radiative corrections to the higgs mass . therefore , the ratio @xmath318 should not be too large in order not to increase the fine - tuning and not to push the stops and the other sfermions out of the lhc reach . from the previous equations we find @xmath319 eq . ( [ eq : ratio ] ) illustrates all the enhancement factors discussed in section [ sec : oneloop ] that can compensate the loop suppression of gaugino masses . the factor 3 corresponds to the number of chiral messenger families ( @xmath320 for @xmath321 ) contributing to gaugino masses , to be compared to the single vector messenger generating sfermion masses at the tree level . the factor @xmath190 comes from the ratio of charges @xmath322 suppressing the stop mass in eq . ( [ eq : comparison ] ) . the factor @xmath323 is the ratio of the vev suppressing gaugino masses ( the one related to supersymmetry breaking though superpotential interactions , @xmath324 ) , and the combination of vevs suppressing sfermion masses ( all of them ) . note that in the presence of hierarchies of vevs , the factor @xmath325 can be large . finally @xmath326 represents a combination of couplings that can further enhance ( or suppress , in this case ) gaugino masses . all in all , we see that the loop factor separating @xmath317 and @xmath175 is partially compensated by a combination of numerical factors : @xmath327 ( leading to @xmath328 for @xmath329 ) becomes at least @xmath330 ( leading to @xmath331 for @xmath329 ) . a largish value of the factors @xmath325 or @xmath326 can then further reduce the hierarchy and even make @xmath332 , if needed . let us now consider the second type of embedding identified above , corresponding to @xmath333 . the most general renormalizable superpotential involving 16 , @xmath254 and @xmath239 , @xmath334 , @xmath212 and invariant under matter parity is @xmath335 the term @xmath336 is just what needed to split the su(5 ) components of the @xmath237 and of the @xmath246 and make heavy the unwanted components @xmath249 and @xmath337 . once 16 acquires a vev @xmath85 , in fact , a mass term is generated for those components , @xmath338 it is remarkable that also in this case the components acquiring a large mass are precisely those that get a negative soft mass term . on the other hand , this is only true in the limit in which the @xmath267 mass term in eq . ( [ eq : w2 ] ) can be neglected . in order to abide to our pure embedding assumption , we will neglect such a term . let us note , however , that such a term should arise at some level in order to make the @xmath339 s components heavy . note that the @xmath340 s do not affect gauge coupling unification at one loop and can therefore be considerably lighter than the gut scale , consistently with the required smallness of @xmath267 . the soft masses for the light sfermions are now @xmath341 unfortunately , the embedding we are discussing can not be implemented with renormalizable interactions and @xmath342 representations only . the problem is obtaining the yukawa interactions . let us consider the up quark yukawas , arising as we saw from the su(5 ) operator in eq . ( [ eq : l1 ] ) . given its size , we expect at least the top yukawa coupling to arise at the renormalizable level . as in the present case @xmath343 , the operator in eq . ( [ eq : l1 ] ) can arise at the renormalizable level from a so(10 ) invariant operator only if @xmath281 has a component in a so(10 ) representation coupling to @xmath344 . and the lowest dimensional possibility containing the 5 of su(5 ) is the 210 . for this reason , we do not pursue this possibility further here , although models with large representations are not a priori excluded . we close this section with a few considerations about the possibility to identify the unified group with @xmath52 . such a possibility looks particularly appealing in the light of what above . we have seen in fact that the most straightforward possibility to realize tree level gauge mediation in so(10 ) requires the matter superfield content to include three @xmath345 , @xmath212 . this is precisely what @xmath52 predicts . the fundamental of @xmath52 , in fact , a representation of dimension 27 , decomposes as @xmath346 the matter content needed by the @xmath345 embedding can therefore be provided in the context of @xmath52 by three matter @xmath347 , @xmath212 , and the @xmath289 and @xmath282 needed to accommodate the higgs fields can also be provided by a single higgs @xmath348 . all yukawas can then in principle follow from the single @xmath52 interaction @xmath349 we postpone the analysis of this promising possibility to further study . in this section , we discuss a few approaches to the @xmath3-problem in the context of tree level gauge mediation . let us remind what the @xmath3-problem is . any supersymmetric extension of the sm must contain two higgs doublet chiral superfields @xmath350 , @xmath351 , with hypercharges @xmath352 , within the light spectrum @xmath9 . moreover , the lagrangian must contain a mass term for their higgsino ( fermion ) components , @xmath353 . it should also contain a corresponding term for the scalar components , @xmath354 , where @xmath207 is a dimension two parameter . the higgsino mass @xmath3 is constrained to be in the window @xmath355 by the present bounds on chargino masses and by naturalness considerations . this coincides with the window for the supersymmetry breaking scale in the observable sector , @xmath356 . it is then tempting try to establish a connection between these two a priori independent scales , in such a way that @xmath357 when @xmath358 , thus making the coincidence of the two scales not accidental . this is the @xmath3-problem . in the absence of such a connection , there would be no reason why @xmath3 should not be of the order of a much larger , supersymmetry conserving scale such as the gut or the planck scale . or , if a symmetry or some other independent principle suppressed @xmath3 , there would be no reason why @xmath3 should not be much smaller . fermion mass terms such as @xmath353 belong to the list of possible soft supersymmetry breaking mass terms @xcite . the reason why they are usually omitted from the mssm effective soft supersymmetry breaking lagrangian is that they can be always reabsorbed in the superpotential ( through appropriate additions to the scalar soft lagrangian ) . moreover , most models of supersymmetry breaking , including the ones we are considering , do not generate such supersymmetry breaking fermion mass terms . we can then assume that the higgsino mass term arises from a corresponding term in the superpotential . the problem is then to relate the coefficient of that ( supersymmetric ) superpotential term , @xmath359 , to the supersymmetry breaking scale in the observable sector , which in our case is given by @xmath360 . we discuss in the following three possible connections . one is peculiar of tree level gauge mediation , the other two have been considered in other contexts , but have specific implementations in tree level gauge mediation . we classify them according to the dimension @xmath29 of the so(10 ) operator from which the @xmath3 term arises . note that we are not addressing the origin of the smallness of @xmath182 and @xmath3 compared to the plank scale , just their connection . the three options we consider are : @xmath361 : : : @xmath3 comes from the operator @xmath362 . it is the supersymmetry breaking scale to be derived from @xmath3 , and not viceversa : @xmath363 , where @xmath364 , and @xmath365 . @xmath366 : : : @xmath3 comes from the operator @xmath367 . the light sm singlet @xmath368 gets a vev from a potential whose only scale is @xmath182 , so that @xmath369 . @xmath370 : : : @xmath3 comes from the operator @xmath371 , so that @xmath372 . let us discuss each of those possibilities in turn . such a possibility was anticipated in @xcite , where however no concrete implementation was given . let us consider the @xmath257 embedding . as discussed in section [ sec:1610 ] , @xmath350 is a superposition of the `` up higgs - type '' components in the @xmath254 s and @xmath236 s ( with @xmath374 ) in the model . analogously , @xmath351 will be a superposition of the `` down higgs - type '' components in the ( @xmath375 ) @xmath376 s and @xmath236 s . the only possible @xmath373 origin of the @xmath3-term in the context of the full so(10 ) theory are then @xmath19 mass terms for the above @xmath254 s , @xmath377 s , and @xmath236 s . as said , we do not address the origin of such a small parameter in the superpotential , as we do not address here the smallness of the supersymmetry breaking scale . the latter can for example be explained by a dynamical mechanism . we want however to relate such mass parameters , in particular the coefficient of a @xmath378 mass term , to the supersymmetry breaking scale . this is actually pretty easy , as the tree level gauge mediation embedding we are considering provides all the necessary ingredients and the result arises from their simple combination . we have seen in fact that the model needs a @xmath377 , @xmath254 pair to get a vev in the sm singlet direction of the scalar component , in order to break so(10 ) to the sm . moreover , we have seen that an independent @xmath309 , @xmath379 pair is required to break supersymmetry trough the @xmath7-term vev of the sm singlet component in the @xmath309 . the simplest way to achieve such a pattern is through a superpotential like @xmath380 where @xmath222 , @xmath6 are so(10 ) singlets and @xmath381 . this is a generalization of an example in @xcite . finally , we have just reminded that the light higgses may have a component in @xmath377 , @xmath309 , @xmath254 , @xmath379 . let @xmath382 be the coefficient of the @xmath296 component in the @xmath309 and @xmath383 the coefficient of the @xmath295 component in the @xmath254 . then a @xmath3 parameter is generated in the form @xmath384 from the @xmath385 term in eq . ( [ eq : wvev ] ) . the parameter @xmath386 is therefore required to be in the window @xmath387 . in the limit @xmath388 , supersymmetry is unbroken and @xmath377 , @xmath254 acquire a vev that can be rotated in the sm singlet component @xmath389 . a non - vanishing @xmath3 , on the other hand , triggers supersymmetry breaking and induces an @xmath7-term vev for the singlet component of the @xmath309 , @xmath390 , with @xmath391 . we therefore have @xmath392 providing the desired connection between @xmath3 and the supersymmetry breaking scale . tree level gauge mediation plays a crucial role not only in providing the ingredients ( and no need to stir ) but also because it is the very so(10 ) structure providing the heavy vector messengers to relate in a single irreducible representation ( the 16 ) supersymmetry breaking ( the @xmath7-term vev of its sm singlet component ) and the down higgs entering the @xmath3-term ( the lepton doublet - type component of the 16 ) . in the appendix [ sec : w ] we provide an existence proof of a ( perturbative ) superpotential that i ) implements the mechanism above , thus breaking supersymmetry and so(10 ) to su(5 ) , ii ) further breaks su(5 ) to the sm , iii ) makes all the fields that are not part of the mssm spectrum heavy , in particular achieves doublet - triplet splitting . this is an implementation of the nmssm solution of the @xmath3-problem ( see e.g. @xcite and references therein ) . as we will see , the implementation of such a solution in the context of tree level gauge mediation avoids some of the problems met in ordinary gauge mediation . in order to implement the nmssm solution of the @xmath3-problem , an explicit term @xmath359 should be forbidden , for example by a symmetry ; the light fields @xmath9 should include a sm singlet @xmath368 , coupling to the higgses through the superpotential interaction @xmath393 ; and @xmath368 should develop a non - zero vev . a @xmath3 parameter will then be generated , @xmath394 . in the absence of terms linear or quadratic in @xmath395 in the superpotential , the scale of a vev for @xmath368 can only be provided by the supersymmetry breaking terms in the soft lagrangian , @xmath396 , in which case @xmath397 , as desired . in order to generate a non - zero vev for @xmath368 , one would like to have a negative soft mass for @xmath368 at the weak scale , along with a stabilization mechanism for large values of the fields . in ordinary gauge mediation this is not easy to achieve . while the stabilization can be simply provided by a @xmath398 term in @xmath150 , as in the nmssm ( or by a quartic term in @xmath399 extensions of the mssm @xcite ) , the soft mass term of @xmath368 vanishes at the messenger scale because @xmath368 is typically a complete gauge singlet . a non - vanishing negative mass term is generated by the rge running but it is typically too small . another problem is that the higgs spectrum can turn out to be non - viable @xcite . a sizable soft mass can still be generated by coupling @xmath368 to additional heavy fields . such possibilities can be implemented in our setup by promoting @xmath368 to an so(10 ) singlet and coupling it to the higgses through a @xmath400 or a @xmath401 coupling to the so(10 ) representations containing ( a component of ) the higgs fields . tree level gauge mediation offers a different avenue . a sizable , negative soft mass term for @xmath368 can in fact be generated by embedding @xmath368 in a @xmath254 of so(10 ) ( this is the only choice within the fields in table [ tab : x ] ) . on the other hand , the stabilization of the potential for @xmath368 is not straightforward . a sizable @xmath398 term is not expected to arise , as it should involve a so(10 ) operator with three @xmath254 . however , the @xmath398 term can be replaced by a term involving a second light singlet @xmath213 , @xmath402 the latter can come from a @xmath403 coupling , if @xmath213 is in the 126 singlet , or from a @xmath404 coupling , where @xmath213 is the @xmath405 singlet and @xmath406 gets a vev . the scalar potential for @xmath407 can be written as @xmath408 where @xmath409 is the mssm scalar potential with @xmath410 , @xmath411 , and @xmath412 or @xmath176 depending on whether @xmath213 comes from a 126 or a 16 . we have neglected the @xmath124-terms , which play a role in explicitly breaking @xmath413-symmetries that could lead to massless states . the potential above has a minimum with a sizable @xmath414 , and a @xmath3 parameter whose size is controlled by @xmath326 . finally , let us consider the possibility to generate the @xmath3 parameter through a @xmath370 correction to the khler in the form @xmath415 , as in the giudice masiero mechanism @xcite . the @xmath7-term vev @xmath416 of @xmath6 would give in this case @xmath417 . we show first that the operator above can not arise at the tree level from integrating out heavy vector or chiral superfields . the corrections to the khler obtained by integrating out heavy vector superfields are given in eqs . ( [ eq : keff2 ] ) . all terms are at least of second order in @xmath418 and no trilinear term is present . moreover , no sizable trilinear term can be obtained through the vev of @xmath66 , as by definition the scalar components of @xmath66 do not get a vev ( and an @xmath7-term vev would give an additional @xmath419 suppression ) . a similar conclusion can be obtained for the corrections one obtains by integrating out chiral superfields @xmath119 with mass @xmath420 . we have seen in section [ sec : tree ] that the equations of motion allow to express @xmath119 in terms of the light fields as in eq . ( [ eq : phih ] ) . since @xmath128 contains terms at least trilinear in the fields , the expression for @xmath119 is at least quadratic in the light fields . when plugging eq . ( [ eq : phih ] ) in the canonical khler for @xmath119 one gets again terms that contain at least four light fields , with none of them getting a vev in the scalar component . therefore , no operator @xmath421 can be generated at the tree level by integrating out heavy fields . let us now consider the possibility that the @xmath370 operator above is obtained at the one loop level . this possibility raises two issues . first , @xmath3 would be suppressed compared to , say , the stop mass @xmath317 by a loop factor @xmath422 . as for the case of gaugino masses vs sfermion masses , such a large hierarchy would lead to sfermions beyond the reach of the lhc and a significant fine - tuning . however , as we will see , this problem can be overcome in the same way as for the gaugino masses . we will see in fact in an explicit model that @xmath3 and @xmath423 get a similar enhancement factor . the second issue is the well known @xmath3-@xmath207 problem . @xmath207 is a dimension two parameter generated , as @xmath3 , at the one loop level . therefore , we expect an order of magnitude separation between @xmath424 and @xmath3 : @xmath425 . this is however tolerable in a scheme in which @xmath426 , with @xmath427 and @xmath428 . the explicit model will show that the above pattern can be achieved in the large @xmath429 regime . in turn , the large @xmath429 regime raises a new issue . the minimization of the mssm potential shows in fact that large @xmath429 corresponds to small @xmath430 , while in the situation we want to reproduce , @xmath431 , we expect @xmath432 . in order to make @xmath429 large we therefore need to cancel the contribution to @xmath207 we get at one loop with an additional contribution , at least in the specific example we consider . such a cancellation may not be required in different implementations of the one - loop @xmath370 origin of the @xmath3 parameter . that is why we believe it is worth illustrating the example below despite the cancellation that needs to be invoked . let us consider as before a model involving the following @xmath374 fields : @xmath377 , @xmath254 , @xmath309 , @xmath379 , @xmath236 , with @xmath389 , @xmath433 , @xmath434 . let us denote the coefficients of the @xmath295 and @xmath296 components in the above so(10 ) representations as follows : @xmath435 , @xmath436 , @xmath437 , @xmath438 , @xmath439 , @xmath440 , where @xmath441 , @xmath442 , @xmath443 , @xmath444 , etc . the notation is in agreement with the definition of @xmath445 , @xmath446 in section [ sec:1610 ] . the @xmath3 and @xmath207 parameters , as the gaugino masses , get a vector and a chiral one - loop contribution , see eqs . ( [ eq : dkloop],[eq : dkloop2],[eq : mu],[eq : bmu ] ) . the vector contribution turns out to be [ eq : muvec ] @xmath447 as in the case of gaugino masses , the vector contribution to @xmath3 is suppressed with respect to the sfermion masses by a full loop factor . we therefore need a larger chiral contribution in order to reduce the hierarchy between @xmath3 and @xmath317 . let us then consider the one - loop chiral contribution associated to the superpotential @xmath448 that is easily found to be vanishing because of a pq symmetry of the superpotential . such a pq symmetry can however be broken by adding a term @xmath449 to the above superpotential , coming for example from the non - renormalizable so(10 ) operator @xmath450 after @xmath254 gets its vev ( note that @xmath451 would give @xmath452 ) . en passant , the singlet mass term in eq . ( [ eq : wpq2 ] ) is nothing but the right - handed neutrino majorana mass term entering the see - saw formula for light neutrino masses . note however that no light neutrino mass is generated here , as the light lepton doublets do not have yukawa interactions with the `` right - handed neutrinos '' , @xmath265 . once the pq symmetry is broken by the mass term in eq . ( [ eq : wpq2 ] ) , the @xmath3 and @xmath207 parameters get a chiral one - loop contribution given by [ eq : muchi ] @xmath453 where @xmath454 , @xmath455 are the top and bottom yukawa couplings respectively and the functions @xmath13 , @xmath47 are given by @xmath456 we have assumed the yukawa couplings @xmath274 , @xmath457 to be hierarchical in the basis in which the down yukawa matrix is diagonal . we can see from eq . ( [ eq : muchi ] ) that the one loop chiral contribution to @xmath3 is comparable to the corresponding contribution to @xmath423 if i ) @xmath458 , which corresponds to the large @xmath429 regime ( remember that the bottom mass is given by @xmath459 , where @xmath460 ) ; ii ) @xmath461 , @xmath462 ; iii ) @xmath463 ; iv ) @xmath464 . if the above conditions are satisfied , @xmath465 and both parameters can easily be enhanced , as explained in section [ sec : gauchi ] , for example because @xmath466 . the only non - trivial condition is the large @xmath429 one . remember in fact that @xmath429 is determined by @xmath207 through the minimization of the mssm potential , which gives @xmath467 therefore large @xmath429 , i.e. small @xmath468 , requires a small @xmath207 . this is in contrast with the situation we want to reproduce , @xmath431 . the rge evolution of @xmath207 from the scale at which it is generated ( @xmath469 ) down to the electroweak scale can reduce the value of @xmath207 but not enough to make it as small as we need . a significant rge contribution would in fact require @xmath470 , in contrast with the @xmath471 we are trying to reproduce . we are then forced to invoke a cancellation between the one - loop contribution to @xmath207 in eq . ( [ eq : muchi]b ) and an additional contribution . for example , a tree level contribution to @xmath207 can be obtained as in appendix b or in @xcite . in this paper we have considered what may be regarded as one of the simplest ways to communicate supersymmetry breaking from a hidden to the observable sector , through the tree level , renormalizable exchange of superheavy gauge ( gut ) messengers , and we have studied the general properties of such a tree level gauge mediation ( tgm ) scheme . we have first of all obtained the general structure of the tree - level soft terms arising from a supersymmetry breaking source that is part of a non - trivial gauge ( gut ) multiplet . this is most conveniently done in the effective theory in which the heavy vector superfields associated to the broken generators are integrated out at the tree level ( en passant , in appendix a , we summarized the procedure to integrate out vector superfields and addressed a few minor issues , such as the generalization to the non - abelian case and the role of gauge invariance in a consistent supersymmetric generalization of the expansion in the number of derivatives ) . the scalar soft terms then obtain the two contributions in eq . ( [ eq : mm ] ) , corresponding to the two diagrams on the right - hand side of fig . [ fig : diagram ] . only the first contribution is relevant for scalars that are not in the same gauge multiplet as the scalar partner of the goldstino ( or have not the same sm quantum numbers as some of the gut generators ) . because of the tracelessness condition , such a contribution gives both positive and negative soft masses . this potential phenomenological problem , which has long been considered as an obstacle to tree level supersymmetry breaking , is automatically solved in the models we consider because the fields getting a @xmath19 negative soft mass also get an @xmath472 positive , supersymmetric mass . gaugino masses do not arise at the tree level , but can be generated at the one - loop level , as in ordinary gauge mediation . they receive two contributions , from loops involving heavy vector or chiral superfields . the loop factor suppression of gaugino compared to sfermion masses must be at least partially compensated if the sfermions are to be within the lhc reach and the split - supersymmetry regime is to be avoided . we calculated in full generality the vector and chiral contributions to gaugino masses corresponding to the diagrams in fig . [ fig : mg ] . we have seen that the vector contribution is always suppressed by a full loop factor and is typically subdominant ( often vanishing ) . on the other hand , the chiral contribution is typically larger . we listed four potential enhancement factors that can ( do ) compensate , at least partially , the loop suppression : a larger number of ( chiral ) messengers contributing to gaugino masses than ( vector ) messengers contributing to sfermion masses ; group theoretical factors that in practice turn out to enhance gaugino masses ; the fact that sfermion masses are suppressed by all the vevs with non - vanishing gauge coupling to the vector messengers , while gaugino masses are suppressed only by the vevs that are related to supersymmetry breaking through superpotential interactions ; ratios of yukawa couplings appearing in the expression for the gaugino masses . in minimal models the first two factors partially compensate the @xmath422 loop factor , reducing it to the level of a tolerable ( and possibly necessary ) one order of magnitude hierarchy between gauginos and sfermions . the last two factors are more model - dependent but can give rise to larger enhancements . the general analysis of the tgm scheme allowed us to define the guidelines to obtain phenomenologically viable models from the general formalism and to identify the assumptions underlying the peculiar predictions one obtains . clear model building guidelines emerge , identifying so(10 ) and @xmath52 as the `` minimal '' grand - unified groups , while su(5 ) is found not to have the necessary structure ( rank @xmath473 ) to realize the tgm scheme . the so(10 ) possibility turns out to be quite appealing . it turns out in fact that the so(10 ) breaking vevs of a @xmath255 , important to break so(10 ) to the sm , typically make heavy precisely the components of the so(10 ) representations that need to be made heavy because of their negative soft supersymmetry breaking masses . this reinforces the logical consistency of the tgm framework . in so(10 ) , the tree level sfermion soft masses turn out to be proportional to their charges under the su(5)-invariant so(10 ) generator @xmath222 . we find two possible embeddings of the mssm superfields into so(10 ) representations , depending on whether @xmath474 is positive or negative . in the first case , @xmath475 , the three mssm families are embedded in three @xmath239 and three @xmath241 , @xmath212 . the quark doublets , the up quark singlets , and the lepton singlets , unified in 10 s of su(5 ) , are embedded in the @xmath239 s , while the lepton doublet and down quark singlets , unified in @xmath235 s of su(5 ) , are embedded in the @xmath241 s . they all get positive soft masses . the spare components in the @xmath239 s and @xmath241 s get superheavy , positive , supersymmetric mass terms ( and tev scale negative soft masses ) . in the second case , @xmath476 , the three mssm families are embedded in three @xmath239 and three @xmath334 , @xmath212 . the mssm fields in 10 s of su(5 ) are embedded in the @xmath334 s , while the ones unified in @xmath235 s of su(5 ) , are embedded in the @xmath239 s . as before , they all get positive soft masses . in both cases the chiral content of the theory is still given by three 16 of so(10 ) . an important property of the tgm soft terms is that they turn out to be family universal , thus solving the supersymmetric flavor problem . this property only depends on the hypothesis that the three mssm families are embedded in the same so(10 ) representations . mixed embeddings , in which the mssm fields are superpositions of fields in inequivalent so(10 ) representations , are also possible , but can spoil the flavor universality property . each of the two possible flavor - universal embeddings leads to specific and peculiar predictions for the soft masses at the gut scale : @xmath1 in the @xmath234 case and @xmath2 in the @xmath245 case , where @xmath477 and @xmath478 are common and family - independent soft masses for the fields in the @xmath235 and @xmath236 of su(5 ) respectively . the latter predictions are only based on i ) the use of the `` minimal '' unified gauge group so(10 ) , ii ) the embedding of the mssm families in the so(10 ) representations with dimension @xmath221 not containing the goldstino , and iii ) the absence of mixed embeddings to automatically preserve flavor - universality . the predictions on the ratios @xmath253 in eq . ( [ eq : prediction ] ) are determined by group theory factors and are peculiar enough to make a possible experimental test at the lhc a strong hint for tree level gauge mediation . the embedding into three @xmath257 s has the advantage that the large top yukawa coupling can be accounted for by a renormalizable superpotential interaction involving only low - dimensional ( @xmath479 ) representations for the chiral superfields . in the @xmath258 case , a @xmath480 representation of so(10 ) must be used to reproduce the top yukawa coupling at the renormalizable level . the @xmath52 option is also quite appealing , as the matter superfield content of the @xmath257 embedding is precisely the one obtained from three fundamentals @xmath347 of @xmath52 . the latter decompose in fact as @xmath481 under so(10 ) . we have postponed the investigation of this promising possibility to further study . finally , we have illustrated three possible approaches to the @xmath3-problem in tgm , which we classify according to the dimension @xmath29 of the so(10 ) operator from which the @xmath3-term arises . the @xmath373 option provides a new approach to the @xmath3-problem , peculiar of tgm . the idea is that the supersymmetry breaking scale turns out to coincide with the @xmath3 scale because supersymmetry is triggered by the same @xmath373 so(10 ) operator from which the @xmath3-term arises . we have provided an explicit realization of such a possibility in appendix b. the superpotential shown there also achieves supersymmetry breaking , so(10 ) breaking to the sm , and ensures that only the mssm fields survive below the breaking scale ( in particular it provides doublet - triplet splitting ) . while it is not meant to be simple or realistic , that superpotential represents a useful existence proof . the @xmath366 option is nothing but the nmssm solution of the @xmath3 problem , in which the @xmath3-term is obtained from the vev of a sm singlet superfield stabilized at the supersymmetry breaking scale . we pointed out that the above singlet can easily get a sizable , predictable , negative soft mass term in tgm . this makes giving a vev to the singlet easier than in ordinary gauge mediation ( where its soft mass usually vanishes before rge running ) , provided that the singlet potential can be made stable . the @xmath370 option is nothing but the giudice - masiero mechanism realized at the loop level , as in gauge mediation . the consequent loop hierarchy between the @xmath3-term and the sfermion masses can be reduced exactly as for the gaugino masses . we provided an explicit example , which however needs an extra contribution to the @xmath207 parameter in order to give rise to the necessary large @xmath429 . we thank andrea brignole and claudio scrucca for useful discussions and acknowledge partial support from the rtn european program `` universenet '' ( mrtn - ct-2006 - 035863 ) . we thank the galileo galilei institute for theoretical physics , where part of this work was done , for the hospitality . in this appendix , after a few general comments , we write the effective theory one obtains by integrating heavy vector superfields at the tree level and in unitary gauge in a generic , non - abelian , @xmath34 globally supersymmetric theory with renormalizable khler @xmath195 and gauge - kinetic function ( the superpotential @xmath150 is allowed to be non - renormalizable ) . the general prescription has been studied in @xcite . in particular , it has been shown in @xcite that the usual expansion in the number of derivatives @xmath482 can be made consistent with supersymmetry by generalizing @xmath482 to the parameter @xmath483 where @xmath484 is the number of fermion bilinears and @xmath485 the number of auxiliary fields from chiral superfields . with such a definition , a chiral superfield @xmath486 has @xmath487 and @xmath488 integrations and supercovariant derivatives have @xmath489 . such an expansion makes sense when supersymmetry breaking takes place at a scale much smaller than the heavy superfield mass @xmath4 and in particular when the @xmath7-terms and fermion bilinears from heavy superfields being integrated out are much smaller than @xmath4 . in the presence of vector superfields one should further assume that the @xmath29-terms and gaugino bilinears are small and should generalize eq . ( [ eq : n ] ) to account for the number @xmath490 of gauginos and the number @xmath491 of vector auxiliary fields . we claim that the correct generalization is @xmath492 according to which a vector superfield @xmath85 has @xmath487 . note that the double weight of @xmath29-terms compared to @xmath7-terms is consistent with eq . ( [ eq : dh ] ) . with such a definition , the initial lagrangian has @xmath493 , except for the gauge kinetic term , which has @xmath494 . chiral and vector superfields can then be integrated out at the tree level by using the supersymmetric equations of motion @xmath495 up to terms with @xmath496 when integrating out chiral superfields and @xmath497 when integrating vector superfields ( with the missing terms originating from the gauge - kinetic term having @xmath498 ) . from a physical point of view , we are interested not only in the expansion in @xmath215 but also , and especially , in the expansion in the power @xmath386 of @xmath499 . it is therefore important then to remark that using eqs . ( [ eq : susyeom ] ) amounts to neglecting terms with @xmath500 when integrating chiral superfields and @xmath501 when integrating out vector superfields . we are now ready to present out results on the effective theory obtained integrating out the heavy vector superfields in a generic supersymmetric gauge theory as above . we are interested in operators with dimension up to 6 ( @xmath502 ) in the effective theory . we can then use the equation @xmath503 . neglecting higher orders in @xmath386 , the latter equation can be rewritten as @xmath504 where @xmath66 is defined in eq . ( [ eq : goldstones ] ) , @xmath505 , the indices run over the broken generators , and @xmath506 is a function of the light vector superfields : @xmath507 ( m^2_{v2})_{ab } = \frac{g^4}{3 } \phi_0^ * t_a^h v^l v^l t^h_b \phi_0 + ( a \leftrightarrow b ) . \end{gathered}\ ] ] in order to solve eq . ( [ eq : vh ] ) for @xmath508 , we need to invert the field - dependent matrix @xmath506 . in the wess - zumino gauge for the light vector superfields , we get @xmath509 the effective contribution to the khler potential is @xmath510 where [ eq : keff2 ] @xmath511 \delta k^1_\text{eff } & = - 2 g^3 ( m_{v0}^2)^{-1}_{ab } ( \phi'^\dagger t^h_a \phi ' ) ( \phi'^\dagger \{v^l , t^h_b\ } \phi ' ) { \stepcounter{mysubequation}\tag{\theequation\protect{{\alph{mysubequation}}}}}\\ \delta k^2_\text{eff } & = - \frac{4}{3 } g^4 ( m_{v0}^2)^{-1}_{ab } ( \phi'^\dagger t^h_a \phi ' ) \phi'^\dagger ( t^h_b v^l v^l + v^l t^h_b v^l + v^l v^l t^h_b ) \phi ' { \stepcounter{mysubequation}\tag{\theequation\protect{{\alph{mysubequation}}}}}\\ & - g^4 ( m_{v0}^2)^{-1}_{ab } \left ( ( \phi'^\dagger \ { t^h_a , v^l \ } \phi ' ) ( \phi'^\dagger \ { t^h_b , v^l \ } \phi ' ) + \frac{1}{3 } ( \phi'^\dagger [ t^h_a , v^l ] \phi ' ) ( \phi'^\dagger [ t^h_b , v^l ] \phi ' ) \right ) . \notag\end{aligned}\ ] ] in recovering eq . ( [ eq : keff2]c ) we have used the identity @xmath512 where @xmath513 are the structure constants of the gauge group , the latin indices refer to broken generators and the greek one refers to an unbroken one . we are interested to soft supersymmetry breaking terms arising from eqs . ( [ eq : keff2 ] ) when some of the auxiliary fields get a vev . the relevant terms should contain up to two @xmath7-terms and one @xmath29-term ( eq . ( [ eq : dh ] ) ) . the only relevant terms are therefore those in ( [ eq : keff2]a ) . in this appendix we provide an example of a superpotential achieving supersymmetry breaking , so(10 ) breaking to the sm , ensuring that below the scale of this breaking only the mssm fields survive ( in particular providing doublet - triplet splitting ) and solving of the @xmath3-problem . we do not aim at being simple or realistic , we just aim at providing an existence proof . we include in this example representations with dimension @xmath514 . it would be interesting to obtain a dynamical supersymmetry breaking , in particular the @xmath7-term vev of a 16 of so(10 ) . so(10 ) will broken to the sm at a scale @xmath515 . below this scale only the mssm fields survive , in particular the higgs triplets are made heavy via a generalization of the dimopoulos - wilczek mechanism @xcite . the @xmath3-term is present in the theory in the form of a @xmath373 operator present at the gut scale and triggers supersymmetry breaking . @xmath516 is generated at the tree - level and turns out to be of the same order as the sfermion masses . the superpotential we use is @xmath517 where @xmath518 here we denote the fields according to their so(10 ) representation , except the so(10 ) singlet fields @xmath519 . the mass parameter @xmath386 is of the order of the tev scale ( we do not discuss the origin of such a small parameter here ) , while all other mass parameters are near the gut scale @xmath520 let us discuss the role of the different contributions to the superpotential and anticipate the vacuum structure and the spectrum . @xmath521 is responsible for supersymmetry breaking and the breaking of so(10 ) to su(5 ) : as we are going to show below , this part of the superpotential generates @xmath472 vevs for the scalar components of @xmath377 and @xmath522 along the su(5 ) singlet direction @xmath523 and @xmath524 and a supersymmetry breaking vev for the @xmath7-term component of @xmath525 along the su(5 ) singlet direction @xmath526 . it also provides small supersymmetry breaking vevs for the @xmath7-term component of @xmath222 @xmath527 and for the @xmath29-term of the vector superfield corresponding to the u(1)@xmath528 generator of so(10 ) @xmath529 this @xmath29-term vev will generate sfermion masses along the lines of section [ sec:1610 ] . this superpotential appears in eq . ( [ eq : wvev ] ) and is a generalization of an example in @xcite . @xmath530 contains the mssm yukawa couplings and provides supersymmetry breaking masses for heavy chiral superfields that will generate gaugino masses at 1-loop as in ordinary gauge mediation . the mssm matter is embedded in both the @xmath239 and the @xmath241 , as explained in section [ sec:1610 ] . the mssm higgs fields are linear combinations of different fields and have components in different representations , @xmath531 therefore the first term in @xmath530 contains the up - type yukawas , while the second and third terms provide down - type and charged lepton yukawas . the second term also gives a large mass to the additional fields @xmath532 and @xmath533 the latter are also the only fields that couple to the @xmath7-term vev in the @xmath525 and act as one - loop messengers of supersymmetry breaking . while this gives a subleading contribution to sfermion masses , it is the only source of gaugino masses in this model . + the role of @xmath534 is the breaking of su(5 ) to the standard model gauge group . it provides a large vev for the @xmath535 along the @xmath536 direction @xmath537 as needed for the dimopoulos - wilzcek mechanism . also @xmath538 and the sm singlet in the @xmath539 take large vevs . @xmath128 merely gives large masses to components in the @xmath525 and @xmath540 . note that since the @xmath541 does not contain su(5 ) singlets , the neutrino component in the @xmath525 stays massless as it should , being the dominant component of the goldstino superfield . @xmath542 takes care of the higgs sector : it keeps the mssm higgs doublets light and gives a large mass to the corresponding triplets . its last term provides the @xmath207 term because @xmath6 gets a small supersymmetry breaking vev and both @xmath543 and @xmath544 have components in the @xmath236 . the @xmath3 term is contained in @xmath521 , because @xmath544 has a component also in the @xmath525 . we are interested in a vacuum that does not break the sm gauge group . thus only that part of the superpotential which involve su(5 ) singlets is relevant for the determination of the ground state . we denote the singlets in @xmath545 by @xmath546 ( which is different than the notation used in the main text ) and the singlets in the @xmath547 by @xmath548 , where @xmath549 are the properly normalized fields corresponding to the @xmath536 and @xmath550 generators in so(10 ) . the relevant part of the superpotential is @xmath551 & + { \overline{s}^{\prime \prime}}\left ( -\frac{{\lambda_{3 } \,}}{2 } t + \frac{{\lambda_{3 } \,}}{2 } \sqrt{\frac{3}{2 } } b + { \lambda_{4 } \ , } u\right ) s + { \overline{s}}\left ( -\frac{{\lambda_{5 } \,}}{2 } t + \frac{{\lambda_{5 } \,}}{2 } \sqrt{\frac{3}{2 } } b + { \lambda_{6 } \ , } u \right ) { s^{\prime \prime}}\\[-1 mm ] & + { m_{45}}(b^2 + t^2 ) + { m_{54}}v^2 + { \lambda_{7 } \ , } v \left ( \frac{1}{2 } \sqrt{\frac{3}{5 } } t^2 - \frac{1}{\sqrt{15 } } b^2 \right ) . \notag\end{aligned}\ ] ] the @xmath7-term and @xmath552-term equations show that susy is broken ( @xmath553 ) and that all vevs are determined except @xmath554 , for which there exist three solutions , all yielding @xmath555 . this tree - level degeneracy is lifted by one - loop corrections which select the solution with @xmath556 . one can check that the vevs are given by @xmath557 s = m - \frac{m^2}{4 m } \left(\frac{1}{\lambda_1 ^ 2 } - \frac{1}{50 g^2}\right ) \qquad { \overline{s}}= m - \frac{m^2}{4 m } \left(\frac{1}{\lambda_1 ^ 2 } + \frac{1}{50 g^2}\right ) \notag \\ u = - \frac{3 \sqrt{5 } } { 2 } \frac{{\lambda_{5 } \,}}{{\lambda_{6 } \ , } { \lambda_{7 } \ , } } \sqrt{{m_{45}}{m_{54 } } } \qquad { u^\prime}= - \frac{3 \sqrt{5 } } { 2 } \frac{{\lambda_{3 } \,}}{{\lambda_{4 } \ , } { \lambda_{7 } \ , } } \sqrt{{m_{45}}{m_{54 } } } \\[1 mm ] v = \frac { \sqrt{15 } { m_{45}}}{{\lambda_{7 } \ , } } \qquad b = \frac{\sqrt{30}}{{\lambda_{7 } \ , } } \sqrt{{m_{45}}{m_{54 } } } \notag \\ f_{{s^\prime } } = - m m \qquad f_z = \frac{m^2}{2 { \lambda_{1 } \ , } } \qquad d_x = - \frac{m^2}{10 g}. \notag \end{gathered}\ ] ] in order to identify the light ( with respect to @xmath558 ) we can set @xmath559 and consider the supersymmetric limit . most fields are at the gut scale , with the light ones being the mssm ones , the goldstino superfield @xmath560 , and the right - handed neutrinos in the @xmath239 , which can easily be made heavy through a non - renormalizable superpotential operator @xmath561 . the mssm matter fields are embedded in the @xmath249 and in the @xmath562 , as desired . the higgs doublets are embedded into the @xmath563 and @xmath564 according to @xmath565 with normalization factors @xmath566 and @xmath567 , where @xmath568 , @xmath569 denote the sm component with the quantum numbers of @xmath296 , @xmath296 in the so(10 ) representation @xmath570 . after switching on @xmath386 the soft supersymmetry breaking terms and @xmath3-term are generated . the @xmath3-term is already present in the high energy lagrangian and is of order @xmath386 , the vev of @xmath552 generates sfermion and higgs masses of order @xmath571 and the vev of @xmath572 gives rise to a @xmath207 term of order @xmath571 . the heavy fields @xmath244 and @xmath243 act as messengers of susy breaking to the gauginos who get masses of order @xmath573 . the goldstino will be mainly the fermion in @xmath560 but gets also small contributions from the gaugino corresponding to the @xmath574 generator and the fermion in @xmath6 . the corresponding scalar will get a mass of order @xmath571 . h. p. nilles , phys . b * 115 * ( 1982 ) 193 ; a.h . chamseddine , r. arnowitt and p. nath , phys . * 49 * , 970 ( 1982 ) ; r. barbieri , s. ferrara and c. a. savoy , phys . b * 119 * , 343 ( 1982 ) ; l.e . ibez , phys . b * 118 * , 73 ( 1982 ) ; l.j . hall , j.d . lykken and s. weinberg , phys . d * 27 * , 2359 ( 1983 ) ; n. ohta , prog . phys . * 70 * , 542 ( 1983 ) . m. dine , w. fischler and m. srednicki , nucl . b * 189 * , 575 ( 1981 ) ; m. dine and w. fischler , phys . b * 110 * , 227 ( 1982 ) ; m. dine and a. e. nelson , phys . d * 48 * , 1277 ( 1993 ) [ arxiv : hep - ph/9303230 ] ; m. dine , a. e. nelson and y. shirman , phys . rev . d * 51 * , 1362 ( 1995 ) [ arxiv : hep - ph/9408384 ] . l. randall and r. sundrum , nucl . b * 557 * , 79 ( 1999 ) [ arxiv : hep - th/9810155 ] ; g. f. giudice , m. a. luty , h. murayama and r. rattazzi , jhep * 9812 * , 027 ( 1998 ) [ arxiv : hep - ph/9810442 ] . d. e. kaplan , g. d. kribs and m. schmaltz , phys . d * 62 * , 035010 ( 2000 ) [ arxiv : hep - ph/9911293 ] ; z. chacko , m. a. luty , a. e. nelson and e. ponton , jhep * 0001 * , 003 ( 2000 ) [ arxiv : hep - ph/9911323 ] . m. nardecchia , a. romanino and r. ziegler , jhep * 0911 * ( 2009 ) 112 [ arxiv:0909.3058 [ hep - ph ] ] . s. ferrara , l. girardello and f. palumbo , phys . d * 20 * ( 1979 ) 403 . s. dimopoulos and h. georgi , nucl . b * 193 * ( 1981 ) 150 . s. weinberg , _ the quantum theory of fields . 3 : supersymmetry _ , cambridge university press . j. wess and j. bagger , _ supersymmetry and supergravity _ , princeton university press . l. brizi , m. gomez - reino and c. a. scrucca , nucl . b * 820 * ( 2009 ) 193 [ arxiv:0904.0370 [ hep - th ] ] . i. affleck , m. dine and n. seiberg , nucl . b * 256 * ( 1985 ) 557 ; a. pomarol and s. dimopoulos , nucl . b * 453 * ( 1995 ) 83 [ arxiv : hep - ph/9505302 ] ; r. rattazzi , phys . b * 375 * , 181 ( 1996 ) [ arxiv : hep - ph/9507315 ] ; n. arkani - hamed , m. dine and s. p. martin , phys . b * 431 * , 329 ( 1998 ) [ arxiv : hep - ph/9803432 ] . k. a. intriligator and n. seiberg , nucl . * 45bc * ( 1996 ) 1 [ arxiv : hep - th/9509066 ] ; k. a. intriligator and n. seiberg , class . quant . grav . * 24 * ( 2007 ) s741 [ arxiv : hep - ph/0702069 ] . n. arkani - hamed , l. j. hall , h. murayama , d. tucker - smith and n. weiner , phys . d * 64 * ( 2001 ) 115011 [ arxiv : hep - ph/0006312 ] ; d. a. demir , l. l. everett and p. langacker , phys . lett . * 100 * , 091804 ( 2008 ) [ arxiv:0712.1341 [ hep - ph ] ] . n. arkani - hamed and s. dimopoulos , jhep * 0506 * ( 2005 ) 073 [ arxiv : hep - th/0405159 ] ; g. f. giudice and a. romanino , nucl . b * 699 * ( 2004 ) 65 [ erratum - ibid . b * 706 * ( 2005 ) 65 ] [ arxiv : hep - ph/0406088 ] . j. hisano , h. murayama and t. goto , phys . d * 49 * , 1446 ( 1994 ) . i. l. buchbinder , s. kuzenko and z. yarevskaya , nucl . b * 411 * ( 1994 ) 665 ; b. de wit , m. t. grisaru and m. rocek , phys . b * 374 * ( 1996 ) 297 [ arxiv : hep - th/9601115 ] ; a. pickering and p. c. west , phys . b * 383 * ( 1996 ) 54 [ arxiv : hep - th/9604147 ] ; m. t. grisaru , m. rocek and r. von unge , phys . b * 383 * ( 1996 ) 415 [ arxiv : hep - th/9605149 ] ; a. brignole , nucl . b * 579 * ( 2000 ) 101 [ arxiv : hep - th/0001121 ] . j. polchinski and l. susskind , phys . d * 26 * ( 1982 ) 3661 . s. dimopoulos and g. f. giudice , phys . b * 393 * ( 1997 ) 72 [ arxiv : hep - ph/9609344 ] . g. r. dvali , g. f. giudice and a. pomarol , nucl . b * 478 * ( 1996 ) 31 [ arxiv : hep - ph/9603238 ] . r. slansky , phys . rept . * 79 * ( 1981 ) 1 . m. frigerio , p. hosteins , s. lavignac and a. romanino , nucl . b * 806 * ( 2009 ) 84 [ arxiv:0804.0801 [ hep - ph ] ] . l. calibbi , m. frigerio , s. lavignac and a. romanino , arxiv:0910.0377 [ hep - ph ] . l. girardello and m. t. grisaru , nucl . b * 194 * ( 1982 ) 65 . n. arkani - hamed , s. dimopoulos , g. f. giudice and a. romanino , nucl . b * 709 * , 3 ( 2005 ) [ arxiv : hep - ph/0409232 ] . u. ellwanger , c. hugonie and a. m. teixeira , arxiv:0910.1785 [ hep - ph ] . p. langacker , n. polonsky and j. wang , phys . d * 60 * ( 1999 ) 115005 [ arxiv : hep - ph/9905252 ] . a. de gouvea , a. friedland and h. murayama , phys . d * 57 * ( 1998 ) 5676 [ arxiv : hep - ph/9711264 ] . g. f. giudice and a. masiero , phys . b * 206 * ( 1988 ) 480 . s. dimopoulos and f. wilczek , nsf - itp-82 - 07 ( unpublished ) ; m. srednicki , nucl . b * 202 * ( 1982 ) 327 . Abstract:

Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.

Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered . Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video . Paper: an abelian cover is a finite morphism @xmath0 of varieties which is the quotient map for a generically faithful action of a finite abelian group @xmath1 . this means that for every component @xmath7 of @xmath2 the @xmath1-action on the restricted cover @xmath8 is faithful . the paper @xcite contains a comprehensive theory of such covers in the case when @xmath2 is smooth and @xmath3 is normal . the covers are described in terms of the _ building data _ consisting of branch divisors @xmath9 ranging over cyclic subgroups @xmath10 , and line bundles @xmath11 with @xmath12 ranging over the character group of @xmath1 . this collection must satisfy the _ fundamental relations_. here , we extend this theory to the case of singular varieties . namely , we allow @xmath3 and @xmath2 to be varieties satisfying serre s condition @xmath4 and having double crossing singularities in codimension 1 , which we abbreviate to g.d.c . for `` generically double crossings '' ( see [ ssec : ysmooth ] for the precise definition ) . our interest in this case lies in applications to the moduli theory . such non - normal abelian covers appear in our work @xcite where we explicitly construct compactifications of moduli spaces of some campedelli and burniat surfaces by adding stable surfaces on the boundary . `` stable surfaces '' here are in the sense of @xcite : they have slc ( semi log canonical ) singularities and ample canonical class . in this paper , we give a comprehensive treatment of the situation . in section [ ssec : ysmooth ] we show that the theory of standard covers of @xcite has a very natural extension to the case when @xmath2 is still smooth but @xmath3 is possibly g.d.c .. in section [ ssec : ynormal ] we extend it to the case of normal base by an @xmath4-fication trick . in section [ ssec : ynonnormal ] we prove that a cover with non normal @xmath2 can be obtained by gluing a cover over the normalization @xmath13 , and we spell out which additional data must be specified . in section [ sec : geometry ] we study the singularities of covers . we determine the conditions for @xmath3 to have slc singularities , to be cohen - macaulay , and we determine the index of the canonical divisor in the situations appearing in common applications . in section [ sec : z2-covers ] we treat in detail the special case when the group @xmath1 is @xmath14 and @xmath15 , as in @xcite . we restrict ourselves to the situation where the base @xmath2 is smooth or has two smooth branches meeting transversally , and the components of branch divisors and the double locus are smooth and have distinct tangent directions at the points of intersection , i.e. locally they look like a collection of lines in the plane . in this situation , we give a complete classification of the covers and the singularities of @xmath3 . the answer is contained in nine tables . some of these covers appear on the boundary of moduli of campedelli and burniat surfaces , but the full list is longer . @xmath1 denotes a finite abelian group . we work with equidimensional varieties defined over an algebraically closed field @xmath16 whose characteristic does not divide the order of @xmath1 . we denote by @xmath17 the group @xmath18 of characters of @xmath1 , and we write it multiplicatively . the abbreviations _ lc _ and _ slc _ stand for _ log canonical _ and _ semi log canonical_. ( cf . [ sec : geometry ] for the definitions ) . @xmath19 , @xmath20 , etc . denote the normalization of @xmath3 , @xmath21 , etc . we use the additive and multiplicative notation for line bundles and divisors interchangeably . linear equivalence will be denoted by @xmath22 . the first author was partially supported by nsf under dms 0901309 . the second author wishes to thank miles reid and angelo vistoli for several useful communications . we also thank the referee for many useful comments and corrections . part of this work was done while both authors were visiting msri in the spring of 2009 . this project was partially supported by the italian prin 2008 project _ geometria delle variet algebriche e dei loro spazi di moduli_. the second author is a member of gnsaga of indam . we recall some basic facts about serre s condition @xmath4 and the @xmath4-fication of a coherent sheaf . for a comprehensive treatment , the reader may consult @xcite , where the latter appears under the name `` @xmath23-closure '' . all varieties below are assumed to be reduced , equidimensional , but possibly reducible . let @xmath24 be a coherent sheaf on @xmath3 all of whose associated components are irreducible components of @xmath3 . then there exists a unique _ @xmath4-fication _ , or _ saturation in codimension 2 _ , a coherent sheaf defined by @xmath25 the sheaf @xmath26 is @xmath4 , and @xmath24 is @xmath4 iff the map @xmath27 is an isomorphism . in particular , for @xmath28 one obtains the @xmath4-fication @xmath29 , which is dominated by the normalization of @xmath3 . on a normal variety @xmath3 , an @xmath4-sheaf is the same as a _ reflexive sheaf _ , satisfying @xmath30 , see @xcite . further , reflexive sheaves of rank 1 are the same as _ divisorial sheaves _ , isomorphic to @xmath31 for some weil divisor @xmath32 , see e.g. ( * ? ? 1 ) . on a smooth ( or factorial ) variety weil divisors are the same as cartier divisors , and rank 1 @xmath4 sheaves are the same as invertible sheaves . let @xmath1 be a finite abelian group . an _ abelian cover _ with galois group @xmath1 , or _ @xmath1-cover _ , is a finite morphism @xmath0 of varieties which is the quotient map for a generically faithful action of a finite abelian group @xmath1 . this means that for every component @xmath7 of @xmath2 the @xmath1-action on the restricted cover @xmath33 is faithful . an _ isomorphism _ of @xmath1-covers @xmath34 , @xmath35 is an isomorphism @xmath36 such that @xmath37 . the @xmath1-action on @xmath3 with @xmath38 is equivalent to a decomposition : @xmath39 where @xmath1 acts on @xmath40 via the character @xmath12 . if @xmath41 is galois then each @xmath40 has rank 1 : if @xmath42 is a general closed point , then @xmath1 acts freely on @xmath43 , so it acts on @xmath44 as the regular representation . thus , @xmath45 is @xmath46-dimensional for every @xmath12 . when the sheaves @xmath40 are locally free , it is customary to write @xmath47 , with @xmath11 a line bundle . [ lem : flatness - and - cm ] 1 . the sheaf @xmath48 is @xmath49 for some @xmath50 iff every @xmath40 is @xmath49 . 2 . if @xmath51 is flat then @xmath3 is cm iff @xmath2 is cm . if @xmath2 is smooth and @xmath3 is @xmath4 then @xmath41 is flat and @xmath3 is cm . \(1 ) is clear by definition of depth . \(2 ) @xmath41 is flat iff every @xmath52-module @xmath40 is invertible . then each @xmath40 is cm iff @xmath52 is . \(3 ) on a smooth variety every divisorial sheaf is invertible , and so flat . now ( 2 ) applies . a @xmath1-cover @xmath51 , where @xmath3 and @xmath2 are @xmath4 varieties , is determined by its restriction to the complement of a closed subset of codimension @xmath5 : [ lem : remove - codim2 ] let @xmath2 be an @xmath4 variety , @xmath53 an open subset with @xmath54 , and @xmath55 a @xmath1-cover with @xmath56 an @xmath4 variety . then there exist a unique @xmath4 variety @xmath3 and a @xmath1-cover @xmath51 whose restriction to @xmath57 is @xmath58 . for the existence , we take @xmath59 , where @xmath60 is the inclusion . then @xmath61 , where each @xmath40 is a rank 1 @xmath4-sheaf . the algebra structure on @xmath48 is defined as follows . for an open set @xmath62 and sections @xmath63 , @xmath64 , their product is @xmath65 since @xmath66 and @xmath40 is saturated in codimension 2 . thus , @xmath67 is an @xmath4 variety with a finite morphism to @xmath2 . the @xmath17-grading on @xmath48 defines the @xmath1-action on @xmath3 . by construction , the eigenspace @xmath68 for the trivial character is @xmath69 . therefore , @xmath38 . uniqueness follows from the uniqueness of the @xmath4-fication . given a @xmath1-cover @xmath51 and an irreducible subset @xmath70 , we define the _ inertia subgroup _ @xmath71 of @xmath72 to be the subgroup of @xmath1 consisting of the elements that fix @xmath73 pointwise , or , equivalently since @xmath1 is abelian , that fix an irreducible component of @xmath73 pointwise . the _ branch locus _ @xmath74 of @xmath41 is the set of points of @xmath2 whose inertia subgroup is not trivial ( notice that we regard @xmath74 simply as a set , without giving it a scheme structure ) . if @xmath41 is flat , then @xmath74 is a divisor by ( * ? ? ? if @xmath75 is an irreducible divisor of @xmath2 such that @xmath3 is generically smooth along @xmath76 , then the natural representation @xmath77 of @xmath78 on the tangent space @xmath79 at the generic point of an irreducible component @xmath80 of @xmath76 is faithful , hence @xmath81 is cyclic ( cf . @xcite ) . notice that @xmath77 does not depend on the choice of the component @xmath80 of @xmath76 since @xmath1 is abelian . in this section we recall , in a form which is convenient for our later applications , the definition of standard abelian covers , a class of flat abelian covers that can be constructed from a collection of line bundles and effective divisors on the target variety ( cf . @xcite , @xcite ) . the prototypical example is the classical construction of a double cover of a variety @xmath2 from the data of an effective divisor @xmath32 on @xmath2 and a line bundle @xmath82 such that @xmath83 . let @xmath2 be a variety . a set of _ building data for a standard @xmath1-cover _ @xmath51 consists of the following : * irreducible effective cartier divisors @xmath84 ( possibly not distinct ) , * for each @xmath85 a pair @xmath86 , where @xmath87 is a cyclic subgroup of @xmath1 of order @xmath88 and @xmath89 is a generator of the group of characters @xmath90 , * line bundles @xmath11 , for @xmath91 . moreover we assume that these data satisfy the so called _ fundamental relations _ : @xmath92 where for a character @xmath12 we write @xmath93 , with @xmath94 , and we define @xmath95 $ ] . observe that @xmath96 is equal either to @xmath97 or to @xmath46 . we call the divisors @xmath85 , together with the pairs @xmath98 , the _ branch data _ of the cover . an equivalent way of describing the branch data , and therefore the building data , is to give for each pair @xmath99 , with @xmath100 a cyclic subgroup and @xmath101 a generator , the divisor @xmath102 . this is the notation used in @xcite . [ rem : branchdata ] if the group @xmath103 has no @xmath104-torsion , where @xmath105 , then the branch data determine the building data by ( * ? ? ? 2.1 ) . in general , the branch data are enough to determine the local geometry of the cover ( cf . proposition [ prop : bdata ] , ( 2 ) ) . when @xmath106 , it is enough to associate with every divisor @xmath85 a nonzero element @xmath107 , the generator of @xmath87 . also , the definition of @xmath108 is simpler : @xmath109 is equal to 1 if @xmath110 and it is equal to 0 otherwise . we now explain how to construct a @xmath1-cover from a set of building data . choose @xmath111 such that @xmath17 is the direct sum of the cyclic subgroups generated by the @xmath112 . denote by @xmath113 the order of @xmath112 and write @xmath114 and @xmath115 . by ( * prop.2.1 ) for @xmath116 there exist isomorphisms : @xmath117 notice that the coefficients @xmath118 in the above formula are integers . using formulae ( 2.15 ) of @xcite and the isomorphisms @xmath119 above , one constructs for each pair @xmath120 of non trivial characters an isomorphism @xmath121 such that for every @xmath122 the following diagram commutes ( we set @xmath123 ) : @xmath124 where @xmath125 and the maps are induced by the @xmath126 in the obvious way . we denote by @xmath127 the maps induced by composing @xmath126 with the inclusion @xmath128 . by the commutativity of diagram , the collection of maps @xmath129 defines on @xmath130 a commutative and associative algebra structure compatible with the @xmath1-action defined by letting @xmath1 act trivially on @xmath131 and via the character @xmath12 on @xmath132 for @xmath133 . we define @xmath134 with the natural map @xmath135 to be a _ standard @xmath1-cover _ associated with the given set of building data . notice that , since the @xmath132 are locally free , @xmath41 is flat and @xmath3 is @xmath4 if @xmath2 is . @xmath3 can be described locally above a point @xmath42 as follows . up to shrinking @xmath2 , we may assume that all the @xmath11 are trivial and that the @xmath85 are defined by equations @xmath136 . if we denote by @xmath137 a coordinate on @xmath132 , @xmath138 , then @xmath3 is given inside the vector bundle @xmath139 by the following set of equations : @xmath140 where the @xmath141 are nowhere vanishing regular functions and for @xmath142 we set @xmath143 . for @xmath144 , denote by @xmath145 the order of @xmath12 and write @xmath146 , with @xmath147 . eliminating between the equations , one gets @xmath148 where @xmath149 is a nowhere vanishing function . it follows immediately that @xmath3 is a variety : indeed , using the decomposition of @xmath150 into @xmath1-eigenspaces , we may assume that a nilpotent element is locally of the form @xmath151 for some character @xmath12 and some regular function @xmath152 . then by , @xmath153 for some @xmath154 only if @xmath155 . using the local equations , one can also show the following : [ lem : inertia ] notation as above . let @xmath156 be a standard @xmath1-cover and @xmath42 be a point . the inertia subgroup @xmath157 of @xmath158 is equal to @xmath159 . since the question is local on @xmath2 , we may assume that @xmath3 is given by the equations . let @xmath160 be a point lying above @xmath158 . then by the coordinate @xmath161 does not vanish iff @xmath162 for every @xmath163 such that @xmath164 . since an element @xmath165 fixes @xmath166 if and only if for every @xmath167 such that @xmath168 the coordinate @xmath161 vanishes , this remark proves the claim . given a set of building data , the construction of the standard @xmath1-cover @xmath51 depends of course on the choice of the characters @xmath169 and of the isomorphims @xmath119 . assume that @xmath170 are another set of characters of @xmath1 such that @xmath17 is the direct sum of the cyclic subgroups generated by the @xmath171 . let @xmath172 be the order of @xmath171 , @xmath173 ; then by the multiplication maps for @xmath174 isomorphisms @xmath175 , where @xmath176 and @xmath177 . by the associativity and commutativity of the multiplication the algebra structure defined on @xmath178 by the @xmath179 is the same as that induced by the @xmath119 . hence it is enough to analyze to what extent the isomorphism class of @xmath41 depends on the @xmath119 : [ prop : bdata ] 1 . _ ( global case ) . _ if @xmath180 , then the building data determine @xmath51 up to isomorphism of @xmath1-covers . 2 . in general , given two standard covers @xmath181 , @xmath182 , with the same building data , there exists an tale cover @xmath183 such that , after base change with @xmath183 , @xmath184 and @xmath185 give isomorphic @xmath1-covers . \(2 ) we use the notation introduced above . let @xmath186 , @xmath187 be two @xmath188-algebra structures on @xmath189 given by isomorphisms @xmath119 , respectively @xmath190 . the isomorphisms @xmath119 , @xmath190 differ by an automorphism of @xmath191 , namely by multiplication by an element @xmath192 . this automorphism is induced by an automorphism of @xmath193 iff @xmath194 has a @xmath113-th root @xmath195 . so , up to taking an tale cover , one can assume that the roots @xmath196 exist . by formulae ( 2.15 ) of @xcite , the @xmath196 can be used to define for all @xmath91 automorphisms @xmath197 of @xmath198 that commute with the isomorphisms @xmath126 and @xmath199 . to prove statement ( 1 ) , just observe that if @xmath180 no base change is necessary to construct the isomorphism above . [ rem : local ] let @xmath51 be a @xmath1-cover with branch data @xmath200 , let @xmath42 and let @xmath136 be local equations for @xmath85 near @xmath158 . combining proposition [ prop : bdata ] with the local equations , we see that , up to passing to an tale cover of @xmath201 , @xmath3 is defined locally near @xmath158 by the equations : @xmath202 here we find conditions for a @xmath1-cover of a smooth variety to be standard . we keep the notation of the previous section . [ defn : hurwitz ] let @xmath2 be a smooth variety and let @xmath51 be a standard @xmath1-cover with building data @xmath11 , @xmath85 , @xmath98 . by lemma [ lem : inertia ] the branch locus @xmath74 of @xmath41 is the support of the divisor @xmath203 . we define the _ hurwitz divisor _ of @xmath41 as the @xmath204-divisor @xmath205 . notice that the support of @xmath32 is equal to @xmath74 . we say that a variety is _ _ ( has _ double crossings _ ) if every point is either smooth or analytically isomorphic to @xmath206 . we say that a variety is _ _ ( has _ generically double crossing_s ) if it is d.c . outside a closed subset of codimension @xmath5 the following result generalizes the main result of @xcite : [ thm : structure ] let @xmath51 be a @xmath1-cover such that @xmath2 is smooth and @xmath3 is @xmath4 . then : 1 . @xmath3 is normal iff @xmath41 is standard and every component of the hurwitz divisor @xmath32 has multiplicity @xmath207 . 2 . assume that @xmath41 is standard . then @xmath3 is g.d.c . iff every component of @xmath32 has multiplicity @xmath208 . 3 . assume that @xmath3 is g.d.c .. then @xmath41 is standard iff for every irreducible divisor @xmath75 of @xmath2 such that @xmath3 is singular above @xmath75 one has @xmath209 for some @xmath210 . in the case @xmath106 , which is of special interest to us because of the applications in @xcite , theorem [ thm : structure ] reads : [ cor : structurez2 ] let @xmath51 be a @xmath6-cover such that @xmath2 is smooth and @xmath3 is @xmath4 . then : 1 . @xmath3 is normal iff @xmath41 is standard and every component of @xmath32 has multiplicity @xmath207 . 2 . @xmath3 is g.d.c . iff @xmath41 is standard and every component of @xmath32 has multiplicity @xmath208 . let @xmath51 be a standard @xmath1-cover with @xmath2 smooth and @xmath3 g.d.c . and let @xmath75 be a component of the branch divisor @xmath74 . by lemma [ lem : inertia ] , we have @xmath211 . the pairs ( subgroup , character ) corresponding to @xmath75 can be determined as follows : * assume that @xmath75 has multiplicity @xmath207 in the hurwitz divisor @xmath32 . then there is precisely one index @xmath163 with @xmath212 . in this case , @xmath213 and the character @xmath89 is given by the action of @xmath87 on the tangent space to @xmath3 at the generic point of an irreducible component of @xmath76 ( cf . @xcite , 1 and 2 ) . * assume that @xmath75 has multiplicity @xmath214 in @xmath32 . then there are precisely two indices @xmath215 and @xmath216 such that @xmath217 and @xmath218 and @xmath219 have order 2 . so either @xmath220 or @xmath221 . in the latter case the proof of theorem [ thm : structure ] shows that @xmath218 and @xmath219 are generated by the elements of @xmath81 that interchange the two branches of @xmath3 at a general point of @xmath76 . statement ( 1 ) is @xcite , thm . 2.1 and cor.3.1 . so consider the non - normal case . the cover @xmath41 is flat since @xmath2 is smooth and @xmath3 is @xmath4 , hence we write as usual @xmath222 . the cover is standard if and only if there exist branch data @xmath85 , @xmath98 such that for every @xmath223 the zero divisor of the multiplication map @xmath224 is equal to @xmath225 , where the @xmath226 are defined in [ ssec : standard ] . notice that @xmath3 , being @xmath4 , is non - normal if and only if it is singular in codimension 1 . fix a component @xmath75 of @xmath32 such that @xmath3 is singular above @xmath75 . write @xmath227 . the cover @xmath41 factors as @xmath228 and @xmath75 is not contained in the branch locus of the map @xmath229 , hence @xmath230 is generically smooth over @xmath75 . it follows that there is an element of @xmath231 that exchanges the two branches of @xmath3 at a general point of @xmath76 . let @xmath232 be the normalization , let @xmath233 be the induced @xmath1-cover , let @xmath234 be the pair ( subgroup , character ) corresponding to @xmath75 for the cover @xmath235 and let @xmath236 be the order of @xmath237 ( if @xmath235 is not branched on @xmath75 , we take @xmath237 and @xmath238 to be trivial ) . since the normalization map @xmath232 is @xmath1-equivariant , we have a short exact sequence : @xmath239 we consider the @xmath231-covers @xmath240 and @xmath241 and we study the algebras @xmath242 and @xmath243 , where @xmath244 is an irreducible component of the inverse image of @xmath75 in @xmath245 . we denote by @xmath246 a local parameter . we distinguish three cases : in this case @xmath247 , and @xmath3 is given locally by @xmath248 , where @xmath249 . let @xmath101 be a generator that restricts to @xmath238 on @xmath237 . the algebra @xmath250 is generated by elements @xmath251 such that : @xmath252 where @xmath253 and @xmath231 acts on @xmath254 via the character @xmath77 and on @xmath255 via the character @xmath256 . the eigenspace corresponding to @xmath257 is generated by @xmath258 for @xmath259 , and by @xmath260 for @xmath261 . since the inclusion @xmath262 is @xmath1-equivariant , @xmath263 is generated by elements of the form @xmath264 for suitable @xmath265 . since @xmath231 fixes @xmath266 pointwise , by the argument in the proof of lemma [ lem : inertia ] @xmath267 is contained in the subalgebra @xmath268 of @xmath250 generated by @xmath269 @xmath270 is also generated by @xmath271 , with the only relation @xmath272 , hence @xmath273 is g.d.c . and the map @xmath274 is an isomorphism . so @xmath275 . in this case @xmath236 is even and @xmath276 . we denote by @xmath101 a character that restricts to @xmath238 on @xmath237 and by @xmath277 the character such that @xmath278 . @xmath250 is generated by @xmath251 such that : @xmath279 where @xmath253 and @xmath231 acts on @xmath254 via the character @xmath77 and on @xmath255 via the character @xmath277 . arguing as in the previous case , one checks that @xmath263 is generated by : @xmath280 @xmath267 can also be generated by @xmath281 with the only relation @xmath272 . for @xmath282 , denote by @xmath283 the order of vanishing on @xmath75 of the multiplication map @xmath284 . using the above analysis and arguing as in the proof of ( 2.1 ) , one obtains the following rules , up to exchanging @xmath285 and @xmath286 : * @xmath287 if @xmath288 , + @xmath289 otherwise . * for @xmath182 , write @xmath290 , where @xmath291 or @xmath46 and @xmath292 . then : + @xmath287 if @xmath293 , @xmath294 , + @xmath295 if @xmath296 , @xmath297 , @xmath298 , + @xmath299 $ ] in the remaining cases . * for @xmath182 , write @xmath300,where @xmath291 or @xmath46 and @xmath292 . then : + @xmath287 if @xmath293 , @xmath294 , + @xmath295 if @xmath296 , @xmath297 , @xmath298 + @xmath301 $ ] in the remaining cases . in the above analysis the group @xmath302 appears in case ( a ) and case ( c ) for @xmath303 . in case ( a ) , the cover @xmath41 is standard : @xmath75 appears twice among the branch data , both times with label @xmath231 . in case ( c ) , @xmath41 is standard for @xmath303 : @xmath75 appears twice among the branch data , with labels @xmath304 and @xmath305 corresponding to the subgroups of order 2 of @xmath231 distinct from @xmath237 . moreover , it is not difficult to check that in case ( b ) and in case ( c ) for @xmath306 the cover is not standard . so we have proven ( 3 ) and also that every component of the hurwitz divisor @xmath32 of a standard g.d.c . cover has multiplicity @xmath307 . vice versa , assume that @xmath41 is standard and @xmath75 appears in @xmath32 with multiplicity @xmath208 . if the multiplicity is @xmath207 then the cover is normal over @xmath75 . if the multiplicity is equal to @xmath46 , then @xmath75 appears twice among the branch data , and the corresponding subgroups @xmath308 and @xmath309 have order 2 . if @xmath310 , then the cover is given over the generic point of @xmath75 by the equation @xmath311 , with @xmath312 a unit ; so it is g.d.c . if @xmath313 , then the cover is given by the equations @xmath314 , @xmath315 , with @xmath316 and @xmath317 units . these equations are equivalent to @xmath318 , so the cover is g.d.c .. this completes the proof of ( 2 ) . let @xmath51 be a @xmath1-cover such that @xmath2 is normal and @xmath3 is @xmath4 . let @xmath57 be the nonsingular locus of @xmath2 . then the restriction @xmath55 is a @xmath1-cover , and by lemma [ lem : remove - codim2 ] @xmath41 is the unique @xmath4-extension of @xmath58 to @xmath2 . thus the theory in the normal case is the immediate extension of the nonsingular case . we record the changes : 1 . the sheaves @xmath40 are no longer invertible but they are @xmath4 , i.e. in this case reflexive , divisorial sheaves . the multiplication maps are @xmath319 2 . the branch divisors @xmath320 are weil divisors . otherwise , the same fundamental relations between @xmath40 and @xmath320 must hold . one has to be careful that the morphism @xmath41 may be not flat ; indeed , it is flat iff all @xmath40 are invertible . also , for a singular @xmath2 the branch locus may have non - divisorial components . let @xmath321 $ ] , @xmath322 acting by @xmath323 , @xmath324 , and let @xmath2 be the quotient @xmath325 $ ] , a quadratic cone . then @xmath41 is ramified only over the vertex @xmath326 of the cone . the divisors @xmath320 are zero . the eigensheaves are @xmath327 and @xmath328 , the divisorial sheaf corresponding to a line @xmath329 through the vertex . @xmath328 is also isomorphic to the @xmath52-submodule of @xmath48 generated by @xmath166 and @xmath158 . the fundamental relation in this case is @xmath330 . now we assume that @xmath2 is a non normal g.d.c . and @xmath4 variety . let @xmath21 be the divisorial part of the singular locus of @xmath2 , let @xmath331 be the normalization , let @xmath332 be the inverse image of @xmath21 in @xmath13 and let @xmath333 be the normalization . since @xmath2 is g.d.c . , there is a biregular involution @xmath334 on @xmath335 induced by the degree 2 map @xmath336 . ( if the components of @xmath2 are smooth , then @xmath335 is a union of several pairs of varieties , exchanged by the involution @xmath334 . in general , some components of @xmath337 map to themselves ) . consider a commutative diagram : where @xmath3 and @xmath338 are g.d.c . and @xmath4 varieties , the vertical arrows are @xmath1-covers , @xmath339 is a cover as in the previous section , and @xmath340 is a birational morphism . we denote by @xmath341 the preimages of @xmath342 in @xmath343 , and by @xmath344 the normalization of @xmath345 . @xmath346 \ar[dd ] \ar@(ul , dl)[]_{j } & & b ' \ar[rr ] \ar[dd ] \ar@{^(->}[dr ] & & b \ar@{^(->}[dr ] \ar[dd ] \\ & & & & & x ' \ar[rr ] \ar[dd ] & & x \ar[dd ] \\ & & \wt{c ' } \ar[rr ] \ar@(ul , dl)[]_{\iota } & & c ' \ar[rr ] \ar@{^(->}[dr ] & & c \ar@{^(->}[dr ] \\ & & & & & \wy \ar^{\nu}[rr ] & & y } \ ] ] we first give two constructions for the cover @xmath0 starting with @xmath347 and the appropriate data for the double locus . one construction proceeds by @xmath4-fication of the `` nice '' part . the second one is by a gluing procedure , and the result is very convenient for computing the invariants of @xmath3 . finally , we show that indeed every @xmath0 comes from these constructions . [ thm : glue ] suppose we are given 1 . @xmath2 , @xmath13 , @xmath332 , @xmath348 , 2 . a @xmath1-cover @xmath339 , with @xmath338 an @xmath4 and g.d.c . variety , let @xmath349 be the induced cover and let @xmath350 be its normalization . then @xmath338 can be glued to a cover @xmath0 with @xmath3 g.d.c . and @xmath4 if and only if it is generically smooth along @xmath345 , and there exists an involution @xmath351 that covers the involution @xmath352 and commutes with the action of @xmath1 on @xmath344 . assume that @xmath3 exists . then the map @xmath353 induces an involution @xmath354 as required . in addition , if @xmath338 were not generically smooth along a component @xmath75 of @xmath345 , then @xmath3 would have generically at least three branches along the image of @xmath75 . thus these two conditions on @xmath338 are necessary for the existence of @xmath3 . next we show that they are also sufficient . we start by identifying the `` bad locus '' . it includes the singular locus of @xmath13 , the intersection of branch divisors between themselves and with @xmath332 . the image of this bad locus in @xmath2 has codimension @xmath355 . let @xmath57 be its complement , and restrict all varieties and covers to @xmath57 . the condition that the involution @xmath354 commutes with the @xmath1-action implies that for any irreducible component @xmath75 of @xmath345 the subgroup @xmath231 of elements of @xmath1 that fix @xmath75 pointwise is the same as the supgroup of elements that fix @xmath356 pointwise . since @xmath338 is generically smooth along @xmath345 , one has ( cf . @xcite ) @xmath357 for some @xmath50 and , working tale - locally , @xmath231 acts locally by @xmath358 near @xmath75 and by @xmath359 near @xmath356 for some primitive root @xmath360 and @xmath361 . here @xmath362 , @xmath363 . we glue @xmath364 along @xmath365 to obtain a variety @xmath56 with a finite morphism to @xmath57 . the @xmath1-action extends to @xmath56 , because @xmath354 commutes with the @xmath1-action , and is of the type ( smooth ) @xmath366 ( compatible action of curves ) , where `` compatible '' means that , working tale - locally , @xmath367 acts on @xmath206 by @xmath368 , @xmath369 over the double locus we have @xmath370/(xy)$ ] and the ring of @xmath371-invariants is @xmath372/(uv)$ ] , where @xmath373 and @xmath374 . thus , @xmath56 has only normal crossings and @xmath375 is a @xmath1-cover . finally , we apply lemma [ lem : remove - codim2 ] to obtain an @xmath4 and g.d.c . cover @xmath0 by taking @xmath4-fication . we obtain @xmath3 by gluing @xmath338 along the involution @xmath376 , i.e. as the pushout of the following commutative diagram : since all varieties are affine over @xmath2 , @xmath48 is the fiber product of the corresponding diagram of @xmath52-algebras , in which we identify sheaves with their pushforwards on @xmath2 . we can rewrite this fiber product diagram by saying that @xmath48 is the kernel in the exact sequence @xmath377 further , we have @xmath378 where @xmath379 is the alternating part ( if @xmath380 then @xmath381 ) , and the image of @xmath382 contains @xmath383 . hence , we have induced exact sequences @xmath384 the thus defined variety @xmath3 is @xmath4 by the next lemma [ lem : sings - after - gluing ] , since @xmath385 is a subsheaf of @xmath379 and so obviously does not have embedded primes . it is g.d.c . again by looking in codimension 1 as in the previous proof . the @xmath1-action on @xmath338 descends to a @xmath1-action on @xmath3 since @xmath354 commutes with the @xmath1-action on @xmath344 and by construction the subalgebra of @xmath1-invariants is the algebra of @xmath386 glued along @xmath387 , i.e. @xmath52 . the varieties @xmath3 obtained in the two proofs coincide , since they both have finite morphisms to @xmath2 , are both @xmath4 and they coincide over an open subset @xmath388 with @xmath389 . [ warn : glue ] it may happen that there is no covering involution of @xmath345 but only of its normalization @xmath390 . then the double locus of @xmath3 is obtained from @xmath391 by some additional gluing in codimension 1 ( codimension 2 for @xmath3 ) . as a consequence , branches of @xmath3 may not be @xmath4 . but the variety @xmath3 is @xmath4 . @xcite contains multiple examples of this phenomenon . on the other hand , the involution @xmath354 need not be unique . for instance , if @xmath165 has order 2 , then @xmath392 is another involution satisfying the assumptions for gluing . the next example shows that gluing via different involutions can give rise to non isomorphic covers . [ ex : pinch ] let @xmath393 . the normalization of @xmath2 is the map @xmath394 defined by @xmath395 . here @xmath396 , @xmath397 and the involution @xmath334 of @xmath335 is given by @xmath398 . let @xmath399 and let @xmath400 be the trivial @xmath401 cover , given by the projection on the coordinates @xmath402 . the @xmath401-action is @xmath403 and @xmath404 . there are two involutions of @xmath344 that lift @xmath334 , namely @xmath405 and @xmath406 . the cover @xmath407 obtained by gluing via @xmath408 is obviously the trivial @xmath401-cover . we describe the cover @xmath409 obtained by gluing via @xmath410 following the second proof of theorem [ thm : glue ] . the map @xmath411 corresponds to the inclusion @xmath412\to \bk[s,\epsilon]/(\epsilon^2 - 1]$ ] and the map @xmath413 corresponds to the surjection @xmath414/(\epsilon^2 - 1 ) \to \bk[s,\epsilon]/(\epsilon^2 - 1]$ ] . the fiber product of these two ring maps can be identified with @xmath415/(\epsilon^2 - 1)\subset \bk[s , t,\epsilon]/(\epsilon^2 - 1)$ ] . the map @xmath416/(x^2-y^2)$ ] defined by @xmath417 , @xmath418 , @xmath419 is an isomorphism , hence @xmath420 is the union of two copies of @xmath421 glued along a line . the cover @xmath409 is given by @xmath422 and the @xmath401-action on @xmath3 is given by @xmath423 , thus @xmath424 is the only branch point . so the ramification locus of a standard @xmath1-cover has always pure codimension 1 but this not true for the @xmath1-covers obtained from a standard cover by gluing and the analogue of lemma [ lem : inertia ] does not hold . [ lem : sings - after - gluing ] with the notations as in the 2nd proof by gluing , assume that @xmath338 is @xmath49 for some @xmath425 . then @xmath3 is @xmath49 iff @xmath385 is @xmath426 . we use the cohomological interpretation of depth using local cohomology @xcite ( alternatively and equivalently one can use @xmath427 ) . a sheaf @xmath186 satisfies @xmath49 iff for every irreducible subvariety @xmath428 one has @xmath429 for all @xmath430 . looking at the long exact sequence of cohomologies corresponding to the short exact sequence , we get @xmath431 for all @xmath432 . the statement now follows . we spell out theorem [ thm : glue ] in a special case , which is of interest to us because of the applications in @xcite . [ ex:2surfaces ] take @xmath106 . for simplicity of exposition , we assume that @xmath433 is the g.d.c . union of two smooth projective surfaces that intersect along a smooth rational curve @xmath21 , but all our considerations generalize straightforwardly to the case of a g.d.c . surface with smooth components whose double locus is a union of smooth rational curves . we have @xmath434 , hence an @xmath4 and g.d.c . @xmath1-cover @xmath339 is the disjoint union of @xmath4 and g.d.c . covers @xmath435 , @xmath182 . by corollary [ cor : structurez2 ] , the covers @xmath436 are standard . we denote by @xmath437 , @xmath438 the branch data of @xmath436 , @xmath182 . we write @xmath439 , @xmath440 and @xmath441 . we denote by @xmath442 the generator of subgroup @xmath443 . an involution @xmath354 of @xmath344 as in theorem [ thm : glue ] exists if and only if there is an isomorphism @xmath444 compatible with the @xmath1-action . this is equivalent to the following conditions : 1 . @xmath445 , 2 . for @xmath446 , denote by @xmath447 the intersection multiplicity at @xmath158 of @xmath448 with @xmath449 , @xmath450 and by @xmath451 the intersection multiplicity at @xmath158 of @xmath452 with @xmath453 , @xmath454 . then : + @xmath455 indeed , ( 1 ) follows immediately by the fact that @xmath354 commutes with the action of @xmath1 . in addition , by the normalization algorithm of @xcite condition ( 2 ) is equivalent to requiring that the branch data of the normalizations @xmath456 and @xmath457 of the @xmath458-coverings of @xmath459 induced by @xmath184 and @xmath185 are the same . since @xmath21 is smooth rational , the branch data are enough to determine the building data ( cf . remark [ rem : branchdata ] ) . since @xmath21 is projective , the building data determine the cover up to isomorphism by proposition [ prop : bdata ] . assume that the gluing conditions are satisfied . giving an involution of @xmath344 that commutes with the @xmath1 action is the same as giving an isomorphism of @xmath1-covers @xmath460 . then any other such map @xmath461 is equal to @xmath462 for some @xmath165 and the automorphism of @xmath463 defined by @xmath464 if @xmath465 and @xmath466 if @xmath467 induces an isomorphism of the cover of @xmath2 obtained by gluing via @xmath468 with the one obtained by gluing via @xmath461 . so in this case all the possible involutions give isomorphic covers . [ thm : the - reverse ] vice versa , every @xmath1-cover @xmath0 with g.d.c . @xmath4 varieties @xmath469 is obtained via the gluing construction of theorem [ thm : glue ] . given @xmath0 and the normalization @xmath470 , let @xmath471 be the fiber product @xmath472 . we define @xmath338 as @xmath473 . thus , @xmath338 is @xmath4 by definition , and it maps to @xmath13 . by the universality of taking the reduced part and @xmath4-fication , there is an induced @xmath1-action on @xmath338 . by the universal property of @xmath1-quotients , we also have a morphism @xmath474 . we claim that it is an isomorphism . it is enough to check this in codimension one over the double locus . we claim that generically over the double locus of @xmath2 , the cover is ( smooth ) @xmath366 ( admissible action of curves ) , where `` admissible '' means that , working tale - locally , @xmath3 is given by @xmath206 , and the action is @xmath368 , @xmath369 for some primitive root @xmath360 and @xmath361 . indeed , let @xmath78 be the subgroup of elements that restrict to the identity on an irreducible component @xmath75 of the double locus of @xmath3 . then on the normalization on both branches we have the same subgroup for the preimages @xmath244 and @xmath475 . since generically @xmath476 are smooth , @xmath477 for some @xmath478 ( note that one possibly has @xmath479 ) . thus , tale locally the morphism @xmath0 can be written as @xmath480/(uv)\to \bk[x , y]/(xy ) , \qquad u\mapsto x^n,\ v\mapsto y^n,\ ] ] where @xmath1 acts as @xmath368 , @xmath369 , @xmath360 , @xmath361 . computing , we get that @xmath471 corresponds to ( smooth)@xmath481/(xy , y^n ) \oplus \bk[x , y]/(xy , x^n)$ ] , and @xmath338 to @xmath482\oplus \bk[y]$ ] . the quotient @xmath483 is then @xmath484\oplus \bk[v]$ ] , i.e. @xmath13 . this proves that @xmath485 is an isomorphism outside a closed subset of codimension @xmath355 . since both are finite over @xmath2 and @xmath4 , @xmath277 is an isomorphism . let @xmath245 be a variety , let @xmath486 , @xmath487 , be effective weil divisors on @xmath3 , possibly reducible , and let @xmath488 be rational numbers with @xmath489 . set @xmath490 . [ defn : lc ] assume that @xmath245 is a _ normal _ variety . then @xmath245 has a canonical weil divisor @xmath491 defined up to linear equivalence . the pair @xmath492 is called _ log canonical _ if 1 . @xmath493 is @xmath494-cartier , i.e. some positive multiple is a cartier divisor , and 2 . every prime divisor of @xmath245 has multiplicity @xmath208 in @xmath495 and for every proper birational morphism @xmath496 with normal @xmath497 , in the natural formula @xmath498 one has @xmath499 . here , @xmath500 are the irreducible exceptional divisors of @xmath501 , the pullback @xmath502 is defined by extending @xmath494-linearly the pullback on cartier divisors , @xmath503 is the strict preimage of @xmath495 . the coefficients @xmath504 are called _ discrepancies_. for the non - exceptional divisors , already appearing on @xmath245 , one defines @xmath505 . + if @xmath506 , then @xmath245 has a resolution of singularities @xmath496 such that @xmath507 is a normal crossing divisor ; then it is sufficient to check the condition @xmath508 for this morphism @xmath501 only . a pair @xmath492 is called _ semi log canonical _ if 1 . @xmath245 satisfies serre s condition @xmath4 , 2 . @xmath245 is g.d.c . , and no divisor @xmath486 contains any component of the double locus of @xmath245 , 3 . some multiple of the weil @xmath494-divisor @xmath493 , well defined thanks to the previous condition , is cartier , and 4 . denoting by @xmath509 the normalization , the pair @xmath510 is log canonical . [ lem : adjunction ] let @xmath511 be a finite morphism of degree @xmath145 between equidimensional @xmath4 varieties . assume that either @xmath512 , or @xmath152 is galois and @xmath513 does not divide @xmath145 . let @xmath57 be an open subset and denote by @xmath514 the induced cover . assume that : * @xmath515 and both @xmath56 and @xmath57 are d.c . , * there exist effective @xmath516-divisors @xmath517 of @xmath3 and @xmath518 of @xmath2 , not containing any component of the double locus , such that @xmath519 , where @xmath520 is the restriction of @xmath518 to @xmath57 and @xmath521 is the restriction of @xmath517 to @xmath56 . then : 1 . @xmath522 is @xmath516-cartier iff so is @xmath523 . 2 . the pair @xmath524 is slc iff so is the pair @xmath525 . \(1 ) let @xmath526 be the inclusion map . if the sheaf @xmath527 is invertible then we have a homomorphism @xmath528 which is an isomorphism outside of codimension 2 . so it must be an isomorphism by the @xmath4 condition . similarly , if the sheaf @xmath529 is invertible then the sheaf @xmath530 is isomorphic to the norm of @xmath531 , so is invertible . \(2 ) assume first that @xmath3 and @xmath2 are normal . in the case this statement , due to shokurov , is very well known . we recall the proof because usually it is only stated and proved in characteristic zero . let @xmath532 be some partial resolution with normal @xmath533 , @xmath338 be the normalization of @xmath534 , and let @xmath535 , @xmath536 be the induced maps . pick an irreducible divisor @xmath537 on @xmath533 , and let @xmath75 be an irreducible divisor on @xmath338 over it . by our condition on @xmath513 , the field extension @xmath538 is separable , and if @xmath539 , @xmath540 are uniformizing parameters in the dvrs @xmath541 and @xmath542 , then one has @xmath543 for a unit @xmath312 and some integer @xmath544 dividing @xmath145 and hence coprime to @xmath513 . then riemann - hurwitz formula applies and says that generically along @xmath537 and @xmath75 one has @xmath545 . comparing this to the identity @xmath546 and the definition of the log discrepancy , one obtains that @xmath547 . thus , @xmath548 @xmath549 @xmath550 . this proves that @xmath551 is lc iff @xmath524 is lc . now consider the general g.d.c . let @xmath552 be the normalization . we have @xmath553 and similarly for @xmath2 . thus , the double loci appear in the divisors @xmath554 , @xmath555 with coefficient 1 . by the riemann - hurwitz formula again , for the normalizations we still have @xmath556 . we conclude by applying the normal case . we now extend definition [ defn : hurwitz ] of hurwitz divisor to the case of a g.d.c . base @xmath2 : [ defn : hurwitz2 ] let @xmath51 be a @xmath1-cover of @xmath4 and g.d.c . varieties . for a prime weil divisor @xmath557 , we define @xmath558 as follows : * if @xmath75 is contained in the double locus of @xmath2 , then @xmath559 ; * if @xmath75 is not contained in the double locus of @xmath2 , but @xmath76 is contained in the double locus of @xmath3 , then @xmath560 , * if @xmath75 is not contained in the double locus of @xmath2 , @xmath76 is not contained in the double locus of @xmath3 and @xmath104 is the ramification order of @xmath41 at @xmath75 , then @xmath561 . we define the hurwitz divisor @xmath32 of @xmath41 to be the @xmath204-divisor @xmath562 . notice that if @xmath0 is a standard @xmath1-cover with @xmath3 g.d.c . this definition coincides with definition [ defn : hurwitz ] by theorem [ thm : structure ] . note that @xmath32 does not contain any components of the double locus of @xmath2 . [ prop : interesting - case ] let @xmath51 be a @xmath1-cover as in definition [ defn : hurwitz2 ] and let @xmath32 be the hurwitz divisor of @xmath41 , let @xmath339 be the corresponding @xmath4 and g.d.c . @xmath1-cover ( cf. [ ssec : ynonnormal ] ) then 1 . @xmath563 is @xmath516-cartier iff so is @xmath564 , and then @xmath565 . 2 . @xmath3 is slc iff so is the pair @xmath566 . recall that @xmath567 and @xmath568 are coprime by assumption . so lemma [ lem : adjunction ] applies and we may assume that @xmath2 is d.c .. we need to show that @xmath569 this is equivalent to the following equality for the cover @xmath570 , where @xmath19 is the normalization of @xmath338 ( and of @xmath3 ) : @xmath571 in view of definition [ defn : hurwitz2 ] the formula follows easily by the usual hurwitz formula . by lemma [ lem : flatness - and - cm ] , a @xmath1-cover over a smooth base is cm . here , we give a partial generalization of this case to the case of a non - normal base . we use the notations of theorem [ thm : glue ] and the exact sequence . [ prop : cm ] assume that @xmath338 is cm ( for example , @xmath13 is smooth ) . then @xmath3 is cm iff the sheaf @xmath385 is cm . immediate by lemma [ lem : sings - after - gluing ] . using proposition [ prop : cm ] it is not hard to give examples of abelian covers @xmath0 such that @xmath2 is cm and g.d.c . , and @xmath3 is g.d.c . and @xmath4 but not cm : [ ex : noncm ] we take @xmath572 and assume @xmath573 ; for any prime @xmath574 one can construct similar examples with @xmath575 and @xmath576 . let @xmath433 be the union of 2 copies of @xmath577 glued transversally along a plane @xmath21 . let @xmath578 and @xmath579 be distinct lines on @xmath21 and for @xmath182 let @xmath580 be a quadric that restricts to @xmath581 on @xmath21 . for a generic choice , @xmath85 is a quadric cone with vertex @xmath582 and the points @xmath583 , @xmath584 and @xmath585 are distinct . let @xmath586 be the double cover of @xmath7 branched on @xmath85 and let @xmath587 . then @xmath338 is gorenstein , has an ordinary double point over @xmath583 and @xmath584 and no other singularity . write @xmath588 and @xmath440 ; then @xmath589 is the union of two copies of @xmath590 glued transversally along @xmath591 and @xmath592 is the trivial @xmath401-cover . hence there exists an involution @xmath354 of @xmath344 that commutes with the @xmath401-action , and by theorem [ thm : glue ] @xmath338 can be glued to an @xmath4 and g.d.c . cover @xmath0 . locus of @xmath3 is the complement of the preimage of @xmath593 . in the exact sequence each term splits under the @xmath1-action and the maps are compatible with the splitting , so we get two exact sequences , one for each character of @xmath1 . since @xmath594 and @xmath401 acts on @xmath379 by switching the two summands , the sequence for the nontrivial character is : @xmath595 where @xmath596 ( resp . @xmath597 ) is the antiinvariant summand of @xmath598 ( resp . of @xmath379 ) . by definition , the map @xmath599 factorizes as @xmath600 . hence , @xmath601 coincides with @xmath602 , the maximal ideal of @xmath603 in @xmath21 , and therefore it is not @xmath4 . it follows by proposition [ prop : cm ] that @xmath3 is not cm over @xmath603 . let @xmath604 be a point distinct from @xmath603 ; in a neighbourhood of @xmath605 we have @xmath606 , thus @xmath607 is not @xmath516-cartier . since @xmath2 is gorenstein , it follows that @xmath608 is not @xmath516-cartier either , hence @xmath563 is not @xmath516-cartier by proposition [ prop : interesting - case ] . all the statements in this section are tale local , so we often pass to a smaller neighbourhood of a point without explicit mention of the fact . for convenience , we write `` @xmath563 '' to denote the divisorial sheaf @xmath609 ( recall that @xmath3 is gorenstein in codimension 1 and @xmath4 ) . we also use the additive notation @xmath607 for the sheaf @xmath610 . we consider the following situation : * @xmath2 is a normal variety and @xmath21 is a reduced effective divisor on @xmath2 such that @xmath611 is cartier ; * @xmath51 is a standard g.d.c . @xmath1-cover ( so @xmath3 is automatically @xmath4 by lemma [ lem : flatness - and - cm ] ) . we assume that @xmath3 is generically smooth over @xmath21 and we denote by @xmath495 the preimage of @xmath21 in @xmath3 . so @xmath495 is also a reduced effective divisor . let @xmath32 be the hurwitz divisor of @xmath41 ; then we have : @xmath612 thus , if @xmath145 is the exponent of @xmath1 , then the divisor @xmath613 is cartier ( recall that the divisors @xmath85 are cartier by the definition of a standard cover in section [ ssec : standard ] ) and thus @xmath614 is also cartier . fix a point @xmath42 ; the purpose of this section is to compute the cartier index of @xmath615 at a point @xmath160 such that @xmath616 . here we are interested mainly in the case @xmath617 , but the case of a pair is needed in the next section to treat the case @xmath2 non - normal . in order to state our result we need some notation . we label the branch data @xmath618 , @xmath619 , in such a way that @xmath620 iff @xmath621 . since the question is local on @xmath2 we may assume that @xmath164 for every @xmath163 . consider the map @xmath622 . by lemma [ lem : inertia ] the image of this map is the inertia subgroup @xmath157 ; we denote by @xmath623 the kernel . we let @xmath624 be the character @xmath625 . since the group @xmath1 is finite abelian , the map @xmath626 is surjective . so the character @xmath627 is the pullback of a character of @xmath157 iff it is the pullback of a character of @xmath1 . [ prop : index - normal ] notation and assumptions as above . + the cartier index of @xmath615 at @xmath166 is equal to the order of @xmath628 . in particular , @xmath615 is cartier iff @xmath627 is the pull back of a character @xmath167 . since the question is local , we may assume that the line bundles @xmath11 , @xmath629 and @xmath630 are trivial . the map @xmath631 is tale , hence up to replacing @xmath2 by @xmath632 we may assume that @xmath633 , or , equivalently , that @xmath634 . we denote by @xmath635 local equations of @xmath84 near @xmath158 . by remark [ rem : local ] , up to passing to an tale cover of @xmath2 we may assume that @xmath3 is given by : @xmath636 the equations : @xmath637 define inside @xmath638 a @xmath639-cover @xmath640 ( @xmath639 acts on @xmath641 via the character @xmath89 ) , the _ maximal totally ramified cover _ of @xmath2 with branch data @xmath642 ( here we regard @xmath87 as a subgroup of @xmath639 ) . since @xmath2 is g.d.c . by assumption and @xmath0 and @xmath640 have the same hurwitz divisor , @xmath643 is also g.d.c . by theorem [ thm : structure ] . for every @xmath167 , write @xmath644 , with @xmath645 for @xmath619 ; then setting @xmath646 defines a map @xmath647 which is the quotient map for the action of the kernel @xmath623 of @xmath648 . the map @xmath574 is unramified in codimension 1 and @xmath649 consists of just one point @xmath650 . denote by @xmath651 the preimage of @xmath21 ( and of @xmath495 ) in @xmath643 ; observe that @xmath652 pulls back to @xmath615 on @xmath3 and to @xmath653 on @xmath643 . if @xmath654 is a generator of @xmath630 then @xmath655 is generated by the residue @xmath656 on @xmath643 of the rational differential form : @xmath657 thus @xmath655 is invertible and @xmath1 acts on the local generator @xmath658 via the character @xmath659 . set @xmath660 . the map @xmath661 is unramified in codimension 1 and @xmath658 descends on @xmath245 to a generator of @xmath662 , where @xmath663 is the image of @xmath651 . the map @xmath664 is a cyclic cover with galois group @xmath665 with the following properties : * it is unramified in codimension 1 and the preimage of @xmath166 consists only of one point , * the pull back of @xmath666 is a line bundle on which the galois group acts via a primitive character . it follows that @xmath664 is a canonical cover and that the cartier index of @xmath615 at @xmath166 is equal to @xmath667 $ ] . [ cor : gor - smooth ] let @xmath668 be a standard abelian with @xmath3 and @xmath2 g.d.c . and @xmath2 gorenstein , let @xmath42 and let @xmath160 be a point such that @xmath616 . then @xmath3 is gorenstein at @xmath166 iff the character @xmath669 descends to a character @xmath12 of @xmath157 . @xmath3 is cohen - macaulay by lemma [ lem : flatness - and - cm ] and @xmath563 is cartier by proposition [ prop : index - normal ] . corollary [ cor : gor - smooth ] is proven in @xcite under the assumption that @xmath3 is normal and @xmath2 is smooth . here we consider the problem of determining the cartier index of @xmath563 at a point @xmath160 of a @xmath1-cover @xmath0 with @xmath2 non - normal of cartier index 1 . the situation is much more complicated than in the case @xmath2 normal and we are able to give only a partial answer , that is however sufficient for the applications in @xcite . the main difficulty is that one does not know how to write down an analogue of the maximal totally ramified cover used in the proof of proposition [ prop : index - normal ] . we consider the following setup : * @xmath670 , where @xmath7 is irreducible for @xmath173 , is a g.d.c . and @xmath4 variety ; @xmath671 is the normalization , * @xmath51 is an @xmath4 and g.d.c . @xmath1-cover obtained by gluing a cover @xmath672 such that @xmath673 is standard for every @xmath163 , * @xmath42 and @xmath160 are points such that @xmath616 ; we assume that @xmath158 lies on every component of the branch locus of @xmath41 . we denote by @xmath618 , @xmath619 the branch data of the standard cover @xmath674 and we assume that @xmath85 is contained in the preimage @xmath332 of the double locus of @xmath2 if and only if @xmath621 . consider the map @xmath622 . as in the case @xmath2 normal , we denote by @xmath675 the character @xmath625 . then : [ prop : index - non - normal ] in the above setup , if @xmath563 is cartier , then : 1 . @xmath564 is @xmath204-cartier , 2 . @xmath669 is the pullback of a character @xmath167 . \(1 ) follows immediately by proposition [ prop : interesting - case ] . \(2 ) for every @xmath173 denote by @xmath676 ( resp . @xmath677 ) the preimage of the double locus of @xmath2 in @xmath678 ( resp . in @xmath679 ) . let @xmath167 be the character via which @xmath1 acts on @xmath680 at @xmath166 . let @xmath681 be a point that maps to @xmath166 and let @xmath682 be the image of @xmath683 in @xmath678 . since @xmath563 pulls back to @xmath684 on @xmath679 , the inertia subgroup @xmath685 acts on @xmath686 via the restriction of @xmath12 . set @xmath687 and let @xmath688 be the restriction of @xmath669 to @xmath689 ; the map @xmath690 is a surjection by lemma [ lem : inertia ] . by the proof of proposition [ prop : index - normal ] @xmath12 pulls back on @xmath689 to @xmath688 . since @xmath691 , it follows that @xmath12 pulls back to @xmath669 on @xmath639 . we now prove a partial converse of proposition [ prop : index - non - normal ] . assume that for every component @xmath678 of @xmath13 the map @xmath692 induces a homeomorphism @xmath693 onto its image ( this is always true up to an tale cover ) . then we associate to @xmath201 an incidence graph @xmath694 as follows : the vertices of @xmath694 are indexed by the branches of @xmath201 , the edges are indexed by the components of the double locus @xmath21 of @xmath2 , the edge corresponding to a component @xmath75 of @xmath21 connects the vertices corresponding to the two branches of @xmath2 through @xmath75 . [ prop : index - graph ] in the above setup , assume that : 1 . the graph @xmath694 is a tree , 2 . @xmath695 is cartier and there exists @xmath104 such that @xmath696 is cartier and @xmath697 , 3 . @xmath669 is the pullback of a character @xmath167 . then @xmath563 is cartier . let @xmath698 the restriction of the double locus @xmath332 of @xmath386 and let @xmath677 be the preimage of @xmath590 . let @xmath699 be the only point that maps to @xmath42 ; let @xmath700 and @xmath701 be defined as in the proof of proposition [ prop : index - non - normal ] . by assumption ( 3 ) , the divisor @xmath684 is cartier by proposition [ prop : index - normal ] . by the following lemma [ lem : character ] , up to replacing @xmath201 by an tale neighbourhood we may assume that for @xmath173 the sheaf @xmath702 is trivial and has a generator @xmath136 on which @xmath1 acts via @xmath12 . by proposition [ prop : interesting - case ] , there exists a local generator @xmath654 of @xmath703 near @xmath166 . for every @xmath163 , by lemma [ lem : character ] , @xmath654 pulls back on @xmath679 to @xmath704 where @xmath705 is a nowhere vanishing regular function on @xmath678 . up to passing to an tale cover of @xmath2 we may assume that @xmath705 has an @xmath104-th root @xmath706 for every @xmath163 . so we may replace @xmath136 by @xmath707 and assume that @xmath654 pulls back to @xmath708 for every @xmath163 . now let @xmath62 be an open set such that @xmath709 is d.c . and the complement of @xmath709 has codimension @xmath710 . let @xmath75 be an irreducible component of the double locus @xmath21 of @xmath2 and let @xmath711 , @xmath712 be the components of @xmath2 that contain @xmath75 . choose an irreducible component @xmath537 of the inverse image of @xmath75 in @xmath709 . it makes sense to compare @xmath713 and @xmath714 along @xmath537 , since they both restrict to local generators of @xmath715 . since @xmath716 , there exists @xmath717 such that @xmath718 along @xmath537 . since @xmath1 acts on @xmath713 and @xmath714 via the same character @xmath12 and @xmath1 acts transitively on the components of the preimage of @xmath75 , @xmath719 depends only on @xmath75 . so @xmath720 represents a class in @xmath721 . since @xmath694 is a tree , we can find @xmath722 such that the local generators @xmath723 glue to give a local generator @xmath658 of @xmath724 on which @xmath1 acts via @xmath12 . we complete the proof of proposition [ prop : index - graph ] by proving the following : [ lem : character ] let @xmath725 be a standard @xmath1-cover with building data @xmath726 . let @xmath727 be a point and let @xmath231 be the inertia subgroup of @xmath255 . let @xmath82 be a @xmath1-linearized line bundle of @xmath245 , let @xmath728 be a point that maps to @xmath255 and let @xmath729 be the character via which @xmath231 acts on @xmath730 . then : 1 . let @xmath167 be such that @xmath731 ; then , up to replacing @xmath732 by an tale neighbourhood of @xmath255 , there exists a generator @xmath656 of @xmath82 such that @xmath1 acts on @xmath656 via the character @xmath12 ; 2 . @xmath656 is uniquely determined by @xmath12 up to multiplication by a nowhere vanishing regular function of @xmath732 . \(2 ) assume that @xmath733 are generators of @xmath82 on which @xmath1 acts via the character @xmath12 . then @xmath734 is a regular @xmath231-invariant function on @xmath245 , so it is a function on @xmath732 . \(1 ) we break the proof into three steps . let @xmath210 be a generator of @xmath82 near @xmath254 . the group @xmath231 acts on the vector space @xmath735 of local sections of @xmath82 spanned by the elements @xmath736 , @xmath737 . @xmath735 is finite - dimensional , and decomposes under the @xmath1-action as a direct sum of eigenspaces . since @xmath738 and @xmath739 , there exists an eigenvector @xmath740 such that @xmath741 . since @xmath1 acts on @xmath730 via @xmath12 , @xmath658 belongs to the eigenspace corresponding to @xmath12 . consider the factorization @xmath742 . the map @xmath743 is an @xmath231-cover such that the preimage of @xmath255 consists of one point @xmath744 . the subgroup @xmath623 acts freely on @xmath245 , hence @xmath82 descends to an @xmath231-linearized line bundle @xmath531 on @xmath497 . then by step 1 there exists a local generator @xmath745 of @xmath531 near @xmath746 such that @xmath231 acts on @xmath745 via @xmath277 . pulling back to @xmath245 we get a generator @xmath654 of @xmath82 on which @xmath231 acts via @xmath277 and @xmath623 acts trivially . denote by @xmath747 the restriction of @xmath12 to @xmath623 , so that @xmath748 . consider the factorization @xmath749 . the map @xmath750 is a tale @xmath623-cover . so there exists a nowhere vanishing function @xmath152 on @xmath751 such that @xmath623 acts on @xmath152 via the character @xmath277 . thus @xmath1 acts on @xmath752 via the character @xmath12 . choose a finite abelian group @xmath623 with a surjective map @xmath753 that extends the inclusion @xmath754 and let @xmath755 be the kernel of @xmath756 . by proposition [ prop : bdata ] , up to replacing @xmath732 by an tale neighbourhood of @xmath255 , we may also assume ( cf . ) that @xmath757 is given inside @xmath758 by the equations : @xmath759 where @xmath760 is a local equation for @xmath85 , @xmath619 . the branch data for @xmath245 can be interpreted in an obvious way as branch data for a @xmath761-cover . letting @xmath762 be the @xmath761-cover given by the equations analogous to , we have @xmath763 by construction . let @xmath764 be the pull back of @xmath82 to @xmath765 . @xmath764 has a natural @xmath761-linearization and @xmath231 is a direct summand of @xmath761 , hence by step 2 there exists a generator @xmath766 of @xmath764 on which @xmath761 acts via the character @xmath767 of @xmath761 induced by @xmath12 . since @xmath755 acts freely on @xmath765 and @xmath768 by construction , @xmath766 descends to a generator @xmath658 of @xmath82 on @xmath245 on which @xmath1 acts via @xmath12 . in this section we make a detailed study of @xmath6-covers of surfaces . we use freely the notation introduced in [ ssec : ynormal ] . in particular , we refer the reader to the commutative diagram ( [ big - diagram ] ) and theorem [ thm : glue ] . * @xmath2 is a g.d.c . surface with smooth irreducible components @xmath769 . the irreducible components @xmath770 of the double curve @xmath21 of @xmath2 are smooth , @xmath2 is d.c . at the smooth points of @xmath21 and it is analytically isomorphic to the cone over a cycle of rational curves at the singular points of @xmath21 . in particular , @xmath2 is gorenstein . * @xmath106 and @xmath51 is a @xmath1-cover with @xmath3 g.d.c . and @xmath4 , obtained as in theorem [ thm : glue ] by gluing a cover @xmath771 such that for every @xmath772 the restricted cover @xmath435 is standard with building data @xmath773 , @xmath774 . * the @xmath775 and the components of the double curve @xmath332 are `` lines '' of @xmath2 , namely they are smooth and meet pairwise transversally . * the intersection points of the support of the hurwitz divisor @xmath32 of @xmath41 with the double curve @xmath21 of @xmath2 are smooth points of @xmath21 . * @xmath564 ( or , equivalently , @xmath32 , since @xmath2 is gorenstein ) is @xmath776-cartier and the pair @xmath566 is slc , so that by proposition [ prop : interesting - case ] @xmath3 is slc and @xmath563 is @xmath776-cartier . recall that , since we assume that the components of @xmath777 and of @xmath332 are lines , the pair @xmath566 is slc iff on @xmath13 the divisor @xmath778 has components of multiplicity @xmath208 and has multiplicity @xmath779 at every point . * for every @xmath42 that is singular for @xmath21 , label the components @xmath780 of @xmath2 containing @xmath158 in such a way that for every @xmath781 the surfaces @xmath7 and @xmath782 meet along an irreducible curve @xmath783 containing @xmath158 ( the indices are taken modulo @xmath784 ) and let @xmath107 be the generator of the inertia subgroup of @xmath783 . by theorem [ thm : glue ] , for every @xmath163 we have @xmath785 . we assume that the natural map @xmath786 is an isomorphism for every @xmath781 . + these conditions imply that the fibre of @xmath0 over @xmath158 consists of @xmath787 points . at each of these points @xmath3 is analytically isomorphic to the cone over a cycle of @xmath784 smooth rational curves . to compute the cohomology of @xmath790 , we are going to write down explicitly in the above situation the sequences in the second proof of theorem [ thm : glue ] ( as usual we push forward to @xmath2 all the sheaves ) . since all the maps are @xmath1-equivariant , the sequences split as sums of exact sequences : @xmath791 where @xmath12 varies in @xmath17 and @xmath1 acts in @xmath40 , @xmath792 and @xmath793 via @xmath12 . to describe the sheaves @xmath792 and @xmath793 , we need to introduce some more notation . given a component @xmath794 of @xmath21 we denote by @xmath795 the generator of the inertia subgroup of @xmath794 and by @xmath796 and @xmath797 the two components of @xmath2 that contain @xmath794 . we denote by @xmath798 ( resp . @xmath799 , @xmath800 ) the preimages of @xmath794 in @xmath3 ( resp . @xmath801 ) and by @xmath802 the common normalization of @xmath798 , @xmath799 , @xmath800 ( cf . example [ ex:2surfaces ] ) . in the following commutative diagram : * we identify @xmath806 with @xmath807 and for every @xmath808 we restrict @xmath809 to @xmath794 , * for every @xmath810 with @xmath811 , we label each point of @xmath812 with the image of @xmath813 in @xmath803 . the same can be done of course for @xmath814 . let @xmath815 be a point such that @xmath777 has multiplicity 1 at the points of @xmath386 that map to @xmath158 ( since we assume that @xmath816 is cartier , the multiplicity of @xmath777 is the same at all points lying over @xmath158 ) . recall that by assumption @xmath2 is d.c . at @xmath158 ; denote by @xmath817 @xmath818 the elements of @xmath1 associated to the two branch lines of @xmath819 containing @xmath158 and by @xmath820 , @xmath821 the elements of @xmath1 associated to the two branch lines of @xmath822 containing @xmath158 . we have @xmath823 modulo @xmath824 ( cf . example [ ex:2surfaces ] ) . then @xmath825 is singular over @xmath158 iff @xmath817 and @xmath818 are both different from @xmath824 , namely iff there exists a character @xmath12 with @xmath826 and @xmath827 . for each @xmath167 and @xmath828 such that @xmath826 we denote by @xmath829 the set of points @xmath830 such that @xmath827 , and we take @xmath829 to be the empty set if @xmath831 . we define in a similar way @xmath832 by considering the cover @xmath833 . we have the following : in our setup , the map @xmath845 is the disjoint union of two copies of @xmath846 that are switched by the involution @xmath354 . so by lemma [ lem : data - c ] the first sequence in can be rewritten as : @xmath847 in addition , if @xmath794 is a component of @xmath21 contained in @xmath796 and @xmath797 , then again by lemma [ lem : data - c ] the image of the map @xmath848 is equal to @xmath849 , so we have an exact sequence : @xmath850 where the cokernel @xmath851 is concentrated on the set @xmath840 . using the description of the singularities of @xmath3 at these points given in [ ssec : setup - z2 ] , one checks that @xmath851 has length 1 at points @xmath158 such that @xmath841 is trivial and it is 0 elsewhere , so @xmath852 . [ rem : inertia ] let @xmath446 be a smooth point , let @xmath75 be the irreducible component of @xmath21 that contains @xmath158 and let @xmath853 , @xmath854 be the two components of @xmath2 that contain @xmath75 . let @xmath231 the subgroup of @xmath1 generated by the inertia subgroups of @xmath75 and of the components of @xmath32 that contain @xmath158 . of course one has @xmath855 , but in the present setup equality actually holds . indeed , if @xmath856 is a non trivial character , then by proposition [ prop : fchi ] the second sequence in can be written near @xmath158 as @xmath857 , where @xmath858 is given by @xmath859 . by lemma [ lem : inertia ] , there exist @xmath860 , @xmath182 , that correspond to functions on @xmath679 that do not vanish at any point of @xmath861 . up to multiplying , say , @xmath862 by a nowhere vanishing regular function on @xmath853 we can arrange that @xmath863 . so @xmath137 corresponds to a function on @xmath3 that is nonzero near @xmath861 and on which @xmath1 acts via the character @xmath12 . it follows that @xmath864 acts freely on @xmath861 , i.e. that @xmath865 . we say that a point @xmath446 is _ relevant _ iff either it is singular for @xmath21 or there exists @xmath828 , @xmath12 with @xmath826 such that @xmath866 . observe that , in view of the assumptions of [ ssec : setup - z2 ] , by proposition [ prop : index - graph ] and by the description of singularities of [ subsec : sings - red - base ] the set of relevant points can be described intrinsically as the set of points of @xmath21 over which @xmath3 is gorenstein but not d.c .. [ ex1 ] let @xmath871 , let @xmath872 be the nonzero elements of @xmath1 and for @xmath873 let @xmath874 be the nonzero character such that @xmath875 . let @xmath876 , @xmath877 and let @xmath2 be the surface obtained by gluing @xmath853 and @xmath854 along a smooth rational curve @xmath21 which is of type @xmath878 on @xmath853 and is a line on @xmath854 . fix three distinct points @xmath879 . for @xmath873 , let @xmath880 be the union of a fibre and a section through @xmath881 and let @xmath882 be a pair of lines through @xmath883 ( the index @xmath354 varies in @xmath884 ) . in the picture below @xmath853 is represented on the left and @xmath854 on the right , the curve @xmath21 is shown in green , red lines correspond to @xmath885 , black lines to @xmath886 and blue lines to @xmath887 . for @xmath182 , we let @xmath435 be the standard @xmath1-cover with branch data @xmath888 , @xmath813 , @xmath889 . solving , we get @xmath890 and @xmath891 , @xmath889 , where @xmath892 denotes the subsheaf of @xmath893 corresponding to the character @xmath112 . notice that the line bundles @xmath892 have no cohomology , hence in particular @xmath894 . by @xcite , for @xmath182 the normalization of the cover of @xmath21 induced by @xmath436 is the trivial @xmath1-cover . so by theorem [ thm : glue ] , we can glue @xmath895 to a cover @xmath51 . by we have : @xmath896 the curve @xmath21 is smooth and the points @xmath897 and @xmath603 are relevant points with @xmath898 , so corollary [ cor : chi ] gives : @xmath899+[g : h_{y_2}]+[g : h_{y_3}]=1 + 1 - 4 + 1 + 1 + 1=1.\ ] ] for @xmath142 , we have an isomorphism @xmath900 , hence @xmath901 has no cohomology in degree @xmath902 and the exact sequence : @xmath903 implies that @xmath904 for @xmath902 . next we compute the cohomology of the sheaves @xmath40 . by proposition [ prop : fchi ] , for @xmath889 we have @xmath905 . so gives an exact sequence : @xmath906 therefore @xmath907 for @xmath889 and thus @xmath908 . as in the previous example , let @xmath871 and for @xmath911 let @xmath435 be the @xmath1-cover branched on the colored lines in the picture . for every @xmath163 , two of the sheaves @xmath912 are @xmath913 and the remaining one is @xmath914 . so the @xmath915 have no cohomology and @xmath916 . it s easy to check using theorem [ thm : glue ] that the cover @xmath917 can be glued to a @xmath1-cover @xmath51 . the normalization @xmath918 of the induced cover of the double curve @xmath21 is the disjoint union of 6 smooth rational curves , each mapping 2-to-1 onto a component of @xmath21 . the only relevant point is the singular point @xmath158 of @xmath21 . so applying and corollary [ cor : chi ] , we get : @xmath919 let @xmath920 be the irreducible components of @xmath21 . for @xmath142 , as in the proof of corollary [ cor : chi ] we have an exact sequence : @xmath921 which gives @xmath922 for @xmath902 . by proposition [ prop : fchi ] , for @xmath923 the sheaf @xmath924 is isomorphic to the direct sum of two copies of @xmath925 , hence it has no higher cohomology . so by we have @xmath926 for @xmath902 and therefore @xmath908 . we wish describe the singularities of a @xmath6-cover @xmath927 as in [ ssec : setup - z2 ] . since the question is local , we fix @xmath42 and we study @xmath3 locally above @xmath2 in the tale topology . by the assumptions in [ ssec : setup - z2 ] , the singularities of @xmath3 over a point @xmath42 lying on @xmath928 components of @xmath2 are degenerate cusps such that the exceptional divisor of its minimal semiresolution is a cycle of @xmath784 rational curves ( cf . * def . 4.20 ) ) . so it is enough to analyze two cases : all the singularities listed in tables [ tab : reduced - lines][tab : r - d12non ] , actually occur on some stable surface of general type . to give examples of the singularities that appear when the base @xmath2 of the cover is smooth , one can take @xmath106 , @xmath929 , a set of generators @xmath930 of @xmath1 , @xmath931 , and lines @xmath932 through a point @xmath933 such that the pair @xmath934 is lc . if @xmath935 , define @xmath936 , where @xmath937 is a general curve of even degree and for @xmath938 let @xmath320 be a general curve of odd degree . the divisors @xmath320 so defined are the branch data for a @xmath1-cover @xmath939 ( equations are easily seen have a solution in this case ) . by proposition [ prop : interesting - case ] the surface @xmath3 is slc and it is of general type as soon as the the degree of the hurwitz divisor @xmath32 is @xmath940 . there is only one point @xmath160 that maps to @xmath158 and all the singularities listed in tables 1 , 2 and 3 with can be realized as @xmath941 in this way and @xmath942 ( for the definition of @xmath231 , see below ) . the singularities with @xmath943 can be obtained by taking a double cover @xmath944 , branched on the sum of @xmath154 lines through @xmath158 and a general curve of degree @xmath145 such that @xmath945 is even and @xmath946 . we let @xmath949 be the branch data of @xmath41 . we may assume that @xmath164 for every @xmath163 . so by the condition that @xmath32 is slc we have @xmath931 and no three of the @xmath85 coincide . whenever the @xmath85 are not all distinct , we assume @xmath950 . all the possible cases are listed in tables [ tab : reduced - lines ] , [ tab : one - double - line ] , [ tab : two - double - lines ] below . the first digit in the label given to each case is equal to the number @xmath154 of components through @xmath158 , followed by @xmath951 if @xmath950 and by @xmath952 if @xmath950 and @xmath953 ( obviously this case occurs only for @xmath954 ) . so , for instance , a label of the form @xmath955 , where @xmath104 is any positive integer , means that @xmath158 belongs to three components of @xmath32 , two of which coincide . * @xmath956 : the order of the subgroup @xmath231 the subgroup generated by @xmath930 . * _ relations : _ describes the relations between @xmath957 . for instance , @xmath958 means @xmath959 . * _ singularity : _ the notations are mostly standard . @xmath960 denotes a cyclic singularity @xmath961 with weights 1,1 . @xmath962 denotes an arrangement consisting of four disjoint @xmath963-curves @xmath964 and of a smooth rational curve @xmath75 intersecting each of the @xmath965 transversely at one point . the self intersection @xmath966 is given in the table . in the non - normal case ( tables 2 and 3 ) we use the notations of @xcite , where kollr and shepherd - barron classified all slc surface singularities over @xmath967 . we work in any characteristic @xmath968 but only the singularities from the list in @xcite appear . `` deg.cusp@xmath969 '' means a degenerate cusp ( cf . * def . 4.20 ) ) such that the exceptional divisor in the minimal semiresolution has @xmath154 components . * @xmath334 : the index of @xmath160 . it is equal to 1 if all the relations have even length and it is equal to 2 otherwise ( cf . proposition [ prop : index - normal ] ) . * @xmath19 : denotes the normalization of @xmath3 ( the entries refer to the cases in table 1 ) . * @xmath970 : @xmath971 is the inverse image in @xmath972 of the double curve @xmath973 of @xmath3 and @xmath974 is the image of @xmath973 in @xmath2 . the symbol @xmath975 denotes the germ of a smooth curve , and @xmath976 is the seminormal curve obtained by gluing @xmath154 copies of @xmath975 at one point . the notation @xmath977 means that the map restricts to a degree @xmath504 map on the @xmath163-th component of @xmath976 ( we do not specify the @xmath504 when they are all equal to 1 ) . * @xmath978 : is the minimal semiresolution of @xmath3 . we write `` d.c . '' when @xmath978 has only normal crossings and `` pinch '' if it has also pinch points . * we always assume @xmath979 . indeed , the cover @xmath41 factors as @xmath980 . by lemma [ lem : inertia ] the map @xmath184 is tale near @xmath158 , while for every @xmath981 the fiber @xmath982 consists only of one point . since @xmath1 acts transitively on each fiber of @xmath41 , it is enough to describe the singularity of @xmath3 above any point @xmath983 . * the cover @xmath3 is normal at @xmath166 iff @xmath984=0 $ ] . it is nonsingular at @xmath166 iff either @xmath985 or @xmath986 , @xmath987 , @xmath988 . assume that @xmath3 is not normal , and let @xmath75 be an irreducible divisor that appears in @xmath32 with multiplicity 1 . this means that , say , @xmath989 and @xmath990 . the normalization of @xmath3 along @xmath75 is a @xmath1-cover of @xmath2 with branch data @xmath991 , for @xmath992 , and , if @xmath993 , @xmath994 ( cf . @xcite ) . * the cover @xmath3 is said to be _ simple _ if the @xmath995 is a basis of @xmath956 ( for instance , @xmath3 is simple if the @xmath996 are all equal ) . in this case @xmath3 is a complete intersection and it is very easy to write down equations for it ( see case @xmath997 below ) . * the double curve @xmath973 maps onto the divisors that appear in @xmath32 with multiplicity @xmath214 . since for a semismooth surface the double curve is locally irreducible , @xmath3 is never semismooth in the cases @xmath998 . in addition , if @xmath3 is semismooth then the pull back @xmath971 of @xmath973 to the normalization is smooth . using this remark , it is easy to check that @xmath3 is never semismooth in the cases @xmath999 , either . * in order to compute the minimal semiresolution @xmath978 , we consider the blow up @xmath1000 of @xmath2 at @xmath158 , pull back @xmath3 and normalize along the exceptional curve @xmath537 to get a cover @xmath1001 . the branch locus of @xmath1002 is supported on a d.c . divisor and , by construction , the singularities of @xmath1003 are only of type @xmath46 , @xmath776 or @xmath1004 . looking at the tables , one sees that either @xmath1003 is semismooth or it has points of type @xmath1005 or @xmath1006 ( cf . table [ tab : reduced - lines ] ) . in the former case @xmath1003 is the minimal semiresolution . in the latter case , blowing up @xmath1007 at the non semismooth points and taking base change and normalization along the exceptional divisor , one gets a semismooth cover @xmath1008 . the semiresolution @xmath1009 is minimal , except in cases @xmath1010 , @xmath1011 . in these cases the minimal semiresolution @xmath978 is obtained by contracting the inverse image in @xmath1012 of the exceptional curve of the blow up @xmath1000 . by remark ( 2 ) above , the normalization @xmath972 is an @xmath231-cover with branch data @xmath1013 , @xmath1014 and @xmath1015 . so @xmath1016 acts on @xmath3 without fixed points and @xmath3 is the disjoint union of two copies of the cover @xmath1017 . we choose local parameters @xmath1018 on @xmath2 such that @xmath950 is given by @xmath1019 , @xmath1020 is defined by @xmath1021 and @xmath1022 by @xmath1023 . the cover @xmath3 is defined tale locally above @xmath158 by the following equations : @xmath1024 in particular @xmath3 is a complete intersection ( see remark ( 3 ) above ) . the element @xmath996 acts on @xmath1025 as multiplication by @xmath1026 . the double curve @xmath973 is the inverse image of @xmath1019 , hence it is defined by @xmath1027 and the map @xmath1028 is given by @xmath1029 , so @xmath973 is isomorphic to @xmath1030 , with each component mapping @xmath776-to-@xmath46 to @xmath1031 . the curve @xmath971 is the inverse image of @xmath1032 in @xmath972 , so it has two connected components , each isomorphic to @xmath1030 , that are glued together in the map @xmath1033 . to compute the minimal semiresolution , consider the blow up @xmath1000 of @xmath2 at @xmath158 and the cover @xmath1002 obtained by pulling back @xmath1034 and normalizing along the exceptional curve @xmath537 . the branch data for @xmath1003 are @xmath1035 and , for @xmath1036 , @xmath1037 , where @xmath1038 indicates the strict transform . the cover is singular precisely above @xmath1039 and it is easy , using the local equations , to check that it is d.c . there . so @xmath1003 is the minimal semiresolution of @xmath3 . the exceptional divisor is the inverse image @xmath75 of @xmath537 in @xmath3 . applying the normalization algorithm to the restricted cover @xmath1040 , one sees that the normalization @xmath1041 of @xmath75 is the union of two smooth rational curves @xmath1042 and @xmath1043 . the map @xmath1044 identifies the two points of @xmath1042 that lie over the point @xmath1045 with the corresponding two points of @xmath1043 . hence @xmath1003 is the minimal semiresolution of @xmath3 and the singularity is a degenerate cusp solved by a cycle of two rational curves . as in the previous case , @xmath972 and @xmath971 can be computed by the normalization algorithm . one obtains that @xmath972 is the disjoint union of two copies of @xmath1046 and @xmath971 is the disjoint union of two copies of @xmath975 . this singularity is the quotient of a cover @xmath56 of type @xmath1047 by the element @xmath1048 . since this element has odd length , the index @xmath334 of @xmath3 at @xmath166 is equal to 2 . since the only fixed point of @xmath1049 on @xmath3 is @xmath1050 , the double curve @xmath973 is the quotient of the double curve @xmath1051 of @xmath56 . the two components of @xmath1051 are identified by @xmath1049 , thus @xmath973 is irreducible and maps @xmath776-to-@xmath46 onto @xmath1032 . to compute the minimal semiresolution , again we blow up @xmath1000 at @xmath158 and consider the cover @xmath1002 obtained by pull back and normalization along the exceptional curve @xmath537 . as usual , we denote by @xmath1052 the strict transform on @xmath1007 of a curve @xmath75 of @xmath2 . the branch data for @xmath1003 are @xmath1053 , @xmath1054 , @xmath1055 , @xmath1056 , and @xmath1057 . so @xmath1003 has normal crossings over @xmath1058 , it has four @xmath948 points over the point @xmath1059 and it is smooth elsewhere ( cf . tables 1 and 2 ) . we blow up at @xmath1060 and take again pull back and normalization along the exceptional curve @xmath1061 . we obtain a cover @xmath1062 which is d.c . over the strict transform @xmath1063 of @xmath1064 and has no other singularity , so @xmath1065 is a semismooth resolution . let @xmath1066 denote the strict transform on @xmath1067 of the exceptional curve @xmath537 of the first blow up . arguing as in case @xmath997 , one sees that inverse image of @xmath1066 is the union of two smooth rational curves @xmath1068 and @xmath1069 that intersect transversely precisely at one point of the double curve , and the inverse image of @xmath1061 consists of 4 disjoint curves @xmath1070 . all these curves pull back to -2 curves on the normalization of @xmath1012 and , up to relabeling , @xmath1071 and @xmath1072 form two disjoint @xmath1073 configurations . so @xmath1074 is the minimal semiresolution of @xmath3 . in the notation of @xcite[def . 4.26 ] , @xmath1012 is obtained by gluing two copies of @xmath1075 along @xmath975 . here we repeat the local analysis of the previous section for the case in which @xmath433 is d.c . , keeping as far as possible the same notations . so we fix @xmath446 , where @xmath21 is the double curve of @xmath2 , and describe @xmath3 locally over @xmath158 . we assume that @xmath0 is obtained by gluing standard covers @xmath435 , @xmath182 , such that @xmath158 lies on all the components of the hurwitz divisor @xmath32 . we let @xmath1076 be the union of the branch data of @xmath184 and @xmath185 such that @xmath85 is distinct from the double curve @xmath21 of @xmath2 ( hence @xmath1077 ) . we denote by @xmath1049 the generator of the inertia subgroup of @xmath21 for @xmath184 and @xmath185 . by remark [ rem : inertia ] the inertia subgroup @xmath157 is equal to @xmath1078 , so up to an tale cover we may assume that @xmath979 and that @xmath634 . since @xmath32 is @xmath204-cartier , there are the same number of @xmath85 on @xmath853 and on @xmath854 . we order them so that all components on @xmath853 come first . recall that @xmath931 by the assumption that @xmath566 is slc . the cases in the tables are labeled @xmath537 ( `` tale '' ) if @xmath1079 and @xmath80 ( `` ramified '' ) if @xmath1080 . the first digit of the label is the number @xmath154 of branch lines through @xmath158 . it is followed by @xmath951 if @xmath950 and by @xmath952 if @xmath950 and @xmath953 . for instance , in the cases e@xmath1081 the map @xmath41 is generically tale over @xmath21 and there are four branch lines @xmath1082 with @xmath950 , and @xmath1083 . the singularities that we get here are non - normal , and as in ( * ? ? ? 4.21 , 4.23 ) they turn out to be either semismooth or degenerate cusps in the gorenstein case and @xmath401-quotients of these otherwise . the tables here contain the same columns as those of [ subsec : sings - smooth - base ] plus an extra one , denoted @xmath12 : this is the contribution of @xmath158 in the formula for @xmath1084 of corollary [ cor : chi ] ( recall @xmath1085 ) . by propositions [ prop : index - non - normal ] and [ prop : index - graph ] the index @xmath334 is equal to 1 if all relations have even length when reduced modulo @xmath1049 and it is equal to 2 otherwise . the analysis of the singularities in the reducible case is similar to the case @xmath2 smooth . one blows up @xmath2 at the point @xmath158 and takes pull back and normalization of @xmath3 along the exceptional divisor . repeating this process , if necessary , one obtains a semiresolution @xmath1086 . if @xmath56 is not minimal , then the minimal semiresolution @xmath1087 is obtained by blowing down the @xmath1088-curves of @xmath56 . the normalization @xmath1089 is equal to @xmath1090 , where @xmath1091 is the normalization of @xmath679 . the branch data of @xmath1092 are @xmath1093 , @xmath1094 , so @xmath1095 is tale locally the disjoint union of four copies of the cover @xmath1096 . @xmath1097 is tale locally the disjoint union of two copies @xmath1017 . the image @xmath974 of the double curve @xmath973 is equal to @xmath1098 . the preimage in @xmath1095 of @xmath974 is the disjoint union of four copies of @xmath1030 . the preimage of @xmath974 in @xmath1099 is equal to two copies of @xmath1030 . hence @xmath1100 . each component of @xmath1101 maps 2-to-1 onto its image . the map @xmath1102 identifies in pairs the four components of the preimage of @xmath1032 and the eight components of the preimage of @xmath21 . so @xmath973 is @xmath1103 , with two components mapping 2-to-1 onto @xmath1032 and four components mapping 2-to-1 onto @xmath21 . to compute the semiresolution , blow up @xmath42 to get @xmath1000 let @xmath1104 and @xmath1105 be the irreducible components of the exceptional divisor . let @xmath1106 be the @xmath1-cover obtained from @xmath0 by taking pull back and normalizing along @xmath1066 and @xmath1061 . denoting by @xmath1038 the strict transform on @xmath1007 , the branch data of @xmath1107 are : @xmath1108 , @xmath1109 , @xmath1053 , @xmath1110 , @xmath1111 , @xmath1112 , @xmath1113 . so @xmath1003 is d.c . by the tables of [ subsec : sings - smooth - base ] and it is therefore the semiresolution @xmath978 of @xmath3 . the preimage of @xmath1066 is the union of four smooth rational curves meeting in pairs over the point @xmath1114 . the preimage of @xmath1061 is the disjoint union of two rational curves , which together with the components of the preimage of @xmath1066 form a cycle of six rational curves . the singularity @xmath160 is gorenstein by proposition [ prop : index - graph ] hence it is `` deg.cusp@xmath1115 '' . this is a @xmath401-quotient of r@xmath1116 and it is not gorenstein by proposition [ prop : index - non - normal ] . the normalization @xmath1089 is equal to @xmath1090 , where @xmath1117 is the normalization of @xmath1118 . the branch data of @xmath1119 are @xmath1120 , @xmath1094 , so @xmath1095 is tale locally the disjoint union of two copies of the cover @xmath1096 . the image @xmath974 of the double curve @xmath973 is equal to @xmath1098 . the preimage in @xmath1121 of @xmath974 is the disjoint union of two copies of @xmath1030 . the preimage of @xmath974 in @xmath1099 is @xmath1030 . hence @xmath1122 . each component of @xmath1101 maps 2-to-1 onto its image in @xmath974 . the map @xmath1102 identifies glues two itself each of the two components of the preimage of @xmath1032 and it identifies in pairs the four components of the preimage of @xmath21 . so @xmath973 is @xmath1123 , with two components mapping 1-to-1 onto @xmath1032 and two components mapping 2-to-1 onto @xmath21 . to compute the semiresolution , blow up @xmath42 to get @xmath1000 let @xmath1104 and @xmath1105 be the irreducible components of the exceptional divisor . let @xmath1106 be the @xmath1-cover obtained from @xmath0 by taking pull back and normalizing along @xmath1066 and @xmath1061 . denoting by @xmath1038 the strict transform on @xmath1007 , the branch data of @xmath1107 are : @xmath1124 , @xmath1125 , @xmath1126 , @xmath1110 , @xmath1111 , @xmath1112 , @xmath1127 . by the tables of [ subsec : sings - smooth - base ] , @xmath1003 has two pinch points over the point @xmath1128 and is at most d.c . elsewhere , hence it is equal to the minimal semiresolution @xmath1129 . the preimage of @xmath1066 is a pair of smooth rational curves meeting over the point @xmath1130 . the preimage of @xmath1061 is a smooth rational curve , meeting each component of the preimage of @xmath1066 at a point lying over @xmath1131 . in the notation of @xcite[def . 4.26 ] , @xmath978 is a chain consisting of copy of @xmath1132 ( namely the second component of @xmath978 ) in the middle and two copies of @xmath1133 with @xmath975 pinched at the ends . barbara fantechi and rita pardini , _ automorphisms and moduli spaces of varieties with ample canonical class via deformations of abelian covers _ , comm . algebra * 25 * ( 1997 ) , no . 5 , 14131441 . mr 1444010 ( 98c:14028 ) miles reid , _ canonical @xmath1134-folds _ , journes de gometrie algbrique dangers , juillet 1979/algebraic geometry , angers , 1979 , sijthoff & noordhoff , alphen aan den rijn , 1980 , pp . 273310 . mr 605348 ( 82i:14025 ) Abstract:

Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.

Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered . Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video . Paper: stars form in dense and cool molecular clouds . when the local density is high enough , the matter can gravitationally collapse and form a young stellar object ( yso ) . in the early phases , the thick envelope dominates the emission from the yso and hides what is going on within ( class i ) . eventually , the envelope flattens out to a circumstellar accretion disk . this disk still causes an infrared ( ir ) excess above the level of a stellar photosphere ( class ii or classical t tauri star - ctts ) , which can be used to distinguish those objects from main - sequence stars , for example using the _ spitzer _ space telescope @xcite infrared array camera ( irac , * ? ? ? * ) . when the disk is cleared , the ir colors of the yso match those of main - sequence stars ( class iii or weak - lined t tauri star - wtts ) . in addition to the circumstellar absorption , many ysos are embedded in the molecular cloud , so that even class iii objects can appear reddened . the accretion disk does not reach down to the central star . instead , the inner edge of the gas disk is truncated by the stellar magnetic field . the inner radius of the optically thick dust in the disk is larger than the inner radius of the gas disk and mostly given by the dust - sublimation temperature . some of the mass in the circumstellar disk condenses into planets , some is blown out by accretion - driven disk and stellar winds , and is accreted onto the central star . this accretion can happen via magnetically confined accretion funnels ( e.g. , * ? ? ? * ) or via some magneto - hydrodynamical instability ( e.g. , * ? ? ? t tauri stars ( tts ) were originally identified by their variability @xcite long before anybody realized that tts are indeed pre - main sequence stars . the dominant timescale in the optical is the stellar rotation period , typically a few days to a week or more . ysos can have cool spots caused by magnetic activity similar to our sun and also hot spots which mark the impact points of the accretion funnels onto the stellar surface ( see , e.g. , review by * ? ? ? this impact happens at free - fall velocities up to 500 km s@xmath1 ; thus , the accretion shock heats the accreted mass to x - ray emitting temperatures . in the optical , the accretion region appears as emission that often is approximated as a blackbody with temperature @xmath2 k ( @xcite , but see also @xcite who argue that line emission contributes to the veiling in addition to a continuum ) . variability in the mass accretion rate can lead to changes in the hot spot signatures . the dynamical timescale that controls the accretion is the keplerian period of the inner disk where the accretion funnels start . the inner disk radius is found close to the co - rotation radius leading to a typical timescale of a few hours for typical masses and rotation periods of ysos . indeed optical variability with amplitudes around 0.1 mag is often observed in ctts on this timescale @xcite . another source of variability related to the accretion could be oscillations of the accretion shock on timescales of seconds . this has been predicted theoretically ( e.g. , * ? ? ? * ) , but is not observed so far , possibly because the accretion spot separates into many small funnels that oscillate independently at different phases and frequencies . however , @xcite find indications that strong accretion in v1647 ori could excite radial pulsations of the star itself . one of the largest classes of short timescale ( @xmath3 days ) optical and ir variability in ysos is that due to variable extinction events @xcite . these come in three categories - aa tau - type variables ( stars with broad , periodic flux dips , whose amplitudes can be up to a magnitude or more in the optical ) , presumably due to our line of sight passing through a warp in the inner circumstellar disk ; stars with similar or narrower flux dips that have no obvious periodicity - presumably due to stars where our line of sight passes close to the disk and where disk instabilities can levitate dust high enough above the plane to intersect our line of sight briefly ; and stars with narrow , periodic flux dips - perhaps where our line of sight is being intersected by dust entrained in material accreting onto the star in a funnel flow . about 20% of the ysos in ngc 2264 fall into one of these categories in the sample of @xcite . ysos can also vary on much longer timescales . variability on the timescales of years could be caused by changing circumstellar extinction for a keplarian disk around a solar - mass yso this timescale translates to a radius of a few au ) or by massive accretion events when a significant fraction of the disk mass drains onto the yso @xcite . in this case the accretion luminosity can outshine the yso by orders of magnitudes and it takes months to years ( in the case of exor outbursts , * ? ? ? * ) or even centuries until the accretion decays back down to the original level . in any lightcurve , several of the processes dicussed above can contibute to the observed variability at the same time and it depends on the properties of each object which one dominates and if secondary effects can be detected in the lightcurve . for example , cool spots , hot spots , absorption , and massive accretion events can all influence the same optical light curve . another case are x - rays , where the flux and the spectrum can change due to periodic absorption , variability in the accretion rate ( tw hya , * ? ? ? * ) or coronal activity similar to what is seen on the sun . in most ysos , the last point is dominant and x - ray lightcurves often show the fast rise in flux and temperature and a slower decay characteristic of coronal activity ( see , e.g. , the _ chandra _ monitoring of the orion nebular cluster , * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ) . the spectral energy distribution ( sed ) of ysos in the optical is dominated by the stellar photosphere and the accretion spot . thus , optical monitoring is very effective for understanding the stellar rotation and the accreting spot . however , the disk radiates mostly at longer wavelengths , which are probed in the ir observations presented in this article . depending on the mass of the disk and the size of the inner hole , the disk will start to dominate the sed at the @xmath4 band or in the irac bands at @xmath5 m and @xmath6 m . simple disk models still treat the disk as a static and axisymmetric structure , but observationally it now seems that the disk is in fact `` a bubbling , boiling , wrinkled , dented , warped mass of gas and dust '' @xcite , see also @xcite . this paper is part of the ysovar ( young stellar object variability ) project , which has monitored the ( onc ) and eleven smaller star forming regions with irac in @xmath5 m and @xmath6 m to understand the mid - ir variability of ysos . first results on the onc are published in @xcite . more details of the observing strategy and an overview of the data can be found in @xcite ( from now on `` paper i '' ) . comparing data from all clusters , paper i defines certain cut - off values for the data reduction , e.g. how much variability in a lightcurve is required to reliably identify an object as variable . in the analysis , paper i concentrates on variability in the ir on timescales of years . in this article , we present a _ spitzer_/irac monitoring campaign of the star forming region l1688 in the mid - ir to characterize the variability timescales and amplitudes as well as the color changes in the mid - ir in much more detail for the objects in l1688 than paper i on timescales up to two years . the structure of this paper is as follows : first , we introduce l1688 , the star forming region targeted by these observations ( section [ sect : thestarformingregionl1688 ] ) . in section [ sect : observationsdatareductionandauxiliarydata ] we introduce the data reduction and discuss source lists and stellar properties obtained from the literature . section [ sect : midirvariability ] classifies all sources according to their variability . section [ sect : resultsanddiscussion ] presents our results and discusses physical models to explain the observed features in the lightcurves . we end with a summary and some conclusions in section [ sect : summary ] . lynds 1688 ( l1688 ) is a sub - cloud of the @xmath7 ophiuchus star forming region , one of the best - studied young clusters in the sky ( see e.g. review by * ? ? ? the central region of l1688 is very dense and deeply embedded ( @xmath8 mag , see figure [ fig : map ] ) . thus , all surveys of the regions necessarily miss some cluster members . an extinction limited , spectroscopic survey @xcite finds an average age of 3.1 myr for a 6.8 pc@xmath9 region centered on l1688 and no significant deviation from the initial mass function . earlier studies concentrated on the deeper embedded core and found a much younger age of 0.3 myr . some , but not all , of this difference is due to the specific reddening laws or pre - main sequence evolutionary tracks used in these studies ( see discussion in * ? ? ? @xcite present photometric and spectroscopic monitoring for five ysos in l1688 nearly simultaneous with the _ spitzer _ observations discussed here . they do not see any correlation between the hydrogen emission lines that are usually considered accretion indicators and the features in the ir lightcurves of their targets , indicating that the relatively modest variability they observed is not caused by changes in the accretion rate . additional notable objects with well - sampled nir lightcurves are @xcite and , which show eclipses with periods of 131 and 93 days , respectively . these sources can be interpreted as multiple systems , where one or more components are eclipsed by a warped circumstellar disk . thus far , the most comprehensive study of near - ir variability of ysos in l1688 is @xcite ( see references therein for other ir variability studies ) , who make use of a two micron all sky survey ( 2mass * ? ? ? * ) calibration field that overlaps l1688 so each source has up to 1584 datapoints in @xmath10 , @xmath11 , and @xmath4 spanning 2.5 years . they find 79% of the known ysos to be variable . in total , 32 sources are periodic ( including cool starspots , hot accretion spots and 6 systems with eclipses ) , 31 sources show a long - term trend and 40 sources vary aperiodically on shorter timescales . the new data presented in this article complements the @xcite study with observations at longer wavelengths . in this section we briefly describe the data reduction for the _ spitzer _ and _ chandra _ observations . a detailed account of the observations , data processing and the source extraction is given in paper i. we also give an overview of auxiliary data on the stellar properties retrieved from the literature , which we need to test if the variability characteristics depend on the central star . we then assess the cluster membership and sed class for every source with a usable lightcurve . ccc 29267200 & 2010 - 04 - 12 11:00:41 & 2010 - 04 - 12 11:18:44 + 29266688 & 2010 - 04 - 12 17:02:37 & 2010 - 04 - 12 17:28:01 + 29266176 & 2010 - 04 - 12 22:48:49 & 2010 - 04 - 12 23:09:28 + 29265664 & 2010 - 04 - 13 08:44:31 & 2010 - 04 - 13 09:05:35 + 29265408 & 2010 - 04 - 13 20:09:17 & 2010 - 04 - 13 20:26:33 + three fields in l1688 were observed with _ spitzer _ in four observing windows from 2010 - 04 - 12 to 2010 - 05 - 16 ( visibility window 1 ) , 2010 - 09 - 22 to 2010 - 10 - 27 ( visibility window 2 ) , 2011 - 04 - 20 to 2011 - 05 - 23 ( visibility window 3 ) , and 2011 - 10 - 01 to 2011 - 11 - 06 ( visibility window 4 ) . these windows are consecutive visibility periods dictated by the _ spitzer _ orbit @xcite . they are shown visually in figure [ fig : cadence ] . in the first visibility window , the sampling is much denser in time than in the later visibility windows . for most sources , about 70 observations with irregular time intervals to aid period detection were obtained in visibility window 1 . in the first visibility window , we use a repeating pattern of 8 observations every 3.5 days . within the 3.5 day period the time - step increases from 2 to 16 hours . in the last three visibility windows , the time steps increase linearly with step lengths of roughly 1 , 2 , 3 , ... days to again sample multiple variability frequencies equally . this irregular sampling minimizes aliasing with the observation frequency . less than ten datapoints per source are taken in each of the later three visibility windows . in total , there are 108 observations with a total mapping time of 30.7 hours . table [ tab : aor ] lists the time of each observation . they can be found under program identification number ( pid ) 61024 in the spitzer heritage archive . each observation consists of six dithers in irac mapping mode using the high - dynamic - range ( hdr ) data acquisition mode which obtains a 0.4 s and a 10.4 s exposure for each pointing . the three fields chosen were observed with the irac 1 and irac 2 channels ( effective wavelengths 3.6@xmath12 m and 4.5@xmath12 m ) . both channels operate simultaneously , but their fields - of - view are non - overlapping . thus , each target field is observed in two consecutive pointings , one for each channel . a secondary field is observed in the secondary channel while the primary channel is observing the target field . in visibility windows 1 and 3 , sources south of the main fields have only irac 1 data , while those to the north only have irac 2 data . in visibility windows 2 and 4 , the situation is reversed . not all sources in the central fields have usable data in both bands , because they might be too bright or too faint in one channel , or fall on the edge of the map . additional sources with two band coverage are found where the northern side field of one target field overlaps with the southern side field of another target field . here we summarize the main data reduction and processing steps described in detail in paper i. basic calibrated data ( bcd ) are obtained from the _ spitzer _ archive . further data reduction is performed with the idl package cluster grinder @xcite , that treats each bcd image for bright source artifacts . aperture photometry is performed on individual bcds with an aperture radius of @xmath13 . to increase the signal - to - noise ratio and to reject cosmic rays , the photometry from all bcds in each observation is combined . the reported value is the average brightness of all bcds within that observation that contain the source in question , after rejecting outliers . the photometric uncertainties obtained from the aperture photometry are , particularly for faint sources , only lower limits to the total uncertainty , since distributed nebulosity often found in star forming regions can contribute to the noise . to improve these estimates , paper i introduces an error floor value that is added in quadrature to the uncertainties of individual photometric points . the value of the error floor is 0.01 mag for irac 1 and 0.007 mag for irac 2 . we cross - match sources from individual observations with a matching radius of @xmath14 with each other and with the 2mass catalog , which is used as a coordinate reference . all photometric measurements performed in the context of the ysovar project are collected in a central database , which we intend to deliver to the infrared science archive ( irsa ) for general distribution . data for this article were retrieved from the ysovar database on 2013 - 10 - 31 and further processed using custom routines in python available at https://github.com/ysovar . we visually checked all frames for lightcurves that are classified as variable in section [ sect : midirvariability ] and removed datapoints visibly affected by instrumental artifacts ( cosmic rays , read - out streaks for bright neighbors ) . figure [ fig : map ] shows the distribution of the sources with lightcurves in our input catalog overlayed on a larger irac 1 map observed during the cryogenic mission . in this article , we consider only objects that have at least five datapoints in our irac 1 or irac 2 lightcurves . a stricter definition is employed in paper i , where only sources with more than five datapoints _ in the fast - cadence data ( first visibility window ) _ are used . in l1688 , 822 of the total list of 882 sources fullfill this stricter condition . in table [ tab : tab2 ] they are marked in the column ` standardset ` . despite the careful data reduction described above , some residual artifacts remain in the _ spitzer _ lightcurves . in this section , we search for artifacts that are related to the position on the detector . compared with other clusters in the ysovar project , l1688 is particularly suited to discover these kinds of effects because the fields observed in l1688 have almost no rotation within one visibility window . the spacecraft orientation flips between visibility windows , so that most instrumental artifacts produce lightcurves that have one level in visibility window 1 and 3 and another level in visibility window 2 and 4 . figure [ fig : instrumentallcs ] shows sources with a magnitude between 8 and 15 in @xmath6 m , that might fall in this category . the relative difference in magnitude is smaller for brighter sources , but since the photometric errors are also smaller these instrumental effects can still be significant . we visually inspected every frame for a sample of sources with lightcurves similar to those in figure [ fig : instrumentallcs ] to identify the cause for the artifacts . we found that several different effects can cause these steps in the lightcurve . some sources are close to a detector edge , such that the background is not well - determined , some are in the wings of the point - spread function ( psf ) of a bright neighbor , and some show residuals from hot pixels . proximity to a detector edge or hot pixel affects only one of the spacecraft orientations ; even the psf wings change with the orientation since the psf is not circular . sufficiently strong intrinsic variability can mask this offset between visibility windows and for any individual source , this instrumental effect can not be distinguished from intrinsic variability with a period of one year . thus , we use a statistical approach to quantify the number of lightcurves that suffer from this problem . for each channel , we have about 200 lightcurves with datapoints in all four observing visibility windows ( the total number of lightcurves is larger , but only for sources in the three target fields do we have data for all four visibility windows ) . if the mean magnitude in a visibility window depends on the detector position of the source , this source will on average be brighter in visibility window 1 and 3 and fainter in visibility window 2 and 4 ( or vice - versa ) . we calculate the mean magnitude in each visibility window and test whether the two brightest mean magnitudes belong to visibility window [ 1,3 ] or [ 2,4 ] or any other combination ( [ 1,2 ] , [ 1,4 ] , [ 2,3 ] , [ 3,4 ] ) . we use the following abbreviated notation : when we calculate the mean magnitudes in each visibility window for a sample of @xmath15 sources , then @xmath16:@xmath17:@xmath18 means that @xmath16 sources have the brightest mean magnitudes in visibility windows [ 1,3 ] , @xmath17 sources in visibility windows [ 2,4 ] and @xmath18 sources have their two brightest mean magnitudes in any other combination of visibility windows . if the difference in the mean magnitude between visibility windows is unrelated to the position on the detector , we expect the ratio @xmath1917%:17%:67% . in contrast , the observed lightcurves have the ratio 47:66:75=25%:35%:40% for irac 1 and 52:59:95=25%:29%:46% for irac 2 . this is incompatible with the expected multinomial distribution ( the probability to observe a distribution at least as far from the expected @xmath20 by chance is @xmath21 ) . in each case , about 50 lightcurves , a quarter of the sample , need to be shifted from the first two bins to the last bin to make the observed distribution compatible with the expected distribution . this implies that about a quarter of all lightcurves suffer from the artifacts described above . however , both irac channels use independent detectors and thus the chance that both channels are affected for the same source and that the effect goes the same way ( bright - faint , vs. faint - bright ) is low . below in section [ sect : midirvariability ] we identify variable sources using a stetson and a @xmath22 test . the limits in those tests are designed to be conservative and indeed we find a distribution of 5:7:24=14%:19%:67% for irac 1 and 5:5:27=14%:14%:73% for irac 2 , when we restrict the sample to those lightcurves that will be classified as variable below . both ratios are fully compatible with the expected multinomial distribution @xmath20 . this shows that the limits we apply are conservative enough that the sample of stars we identify as variable has no or only few sources where the variability is not due to intrinsic source variability . therefore it is not necessary to remove any source based on magnitude jumps between visibility windows . only one of the four lightcurves shown in figure [ fig : instrumentallcs ] ( sstysv j162727.53 - 242611.2 ) will be identified as variable below . we visually inspected all lightcurves that are marked as variable and , apart form the example shown above , we did not see lightcurves where the variability seems to be due to the pattern discussed in this section . in summary , about a quarter of all lightcurves are affected by detector position dependent artifacts . in extreme cases , the associated jumps reach 0.5 mag for a 14 mag source , and up to 0.05 mag in bright sources around 8 mag . however , we show statistically that the definition of variability we use is so conservative that this effect does not contribute a significant number of objects to our sample of variable sources . disk - bearing ysos can be identified from _ spitzer _ data alone , but information in other spectral bands is required to find the other cluster members . x - ray observations are one way to identify diskless ( class iii ) ysos . in the ir the seds of those sources are indistinguishable from a main - sequence field star , but due to their rapid rotation , ysos are much brighter in x - rays than field stars . l1688 was observed by _ chandra _ on 2000 - 04 - 13 for 100 ks exposure time in the ` faint ` mode with the acis instrument ( ) . we reprocessed this exposure with the anchors pipeline @xcite using a recent calibration ; see discussion in paper i. these data has been analyzed in detail to study the distribution of x - ray properties in ctts and to identify brown dwarfs in this star forming region @xcite . during the observation , five acis chips were operational , four from the central acis - i imaging array , as well as one acis - s chip . the point - spread - function ( psf ) degrades significantly for sources located off - axis , and thus the coordinates of the outer sources are less reliable . to cross - match x - ray sources with _ sources we used a matching radius of 1 for x - ray sources within 3 of the optical axis of _ chandra _ , 1.5 for sources between 3 and 6 away from the optical axis and 2 for all sources located further than 6 from the optical axis . the observed _ chandra _ field overlaps about two thirds of the area covered in the _ spitzer _ monitoring . however , the variable psf leads to a sensitivity that varies over the observed field , thus the absence of an x - ray detection for _ spitzer _ sources does not necessarily imply the absence of x - ray emission . the acis detector has an intrinsic energy resolution , and we use the net flux to characterize the x - ray properties . for sources with more than 20 counts , we also fit an absorbed single - temperature apec model @xcite with abundances fixed at 0.3 times the solar value from @xcite . sources are extracted down to a very low significance . in total , there are 315 detected x - ray sources , but only 31 of them match an object with a _ spitzer _ we disregard all unmatched sources ; for sources with a lightcurve and an x - ray counterpart , the x - ray properties are given in table [ tab : tab2 ] . to estimate the number of spurious matches , we multiply the fraction of the total survey area that is included in the positional error circles of the x - ray sources with the number of _ spitzer _ sources with lightcurves . the result is the average number of spurious matches . we expect at most 2 - 4 _ spitzer _ sources to be matched to a spurious x - ray source . x - ray sources that are cross - matched successfully are marked in figure [ fig : map ] . the star forming region l1688 has been the target of intense study over the past decades and a wealth of additional information exists in the literature . in particular , we refer the reader to two reviews @xcite . the latter review compiles a list of objects with a high probability of membership from a variety of published sources . the membership criteria employed are ( i ) x - ray emission , which at the distance of l1688 is detectable only from young , and thus active stars ; ( ii ) optical spectroscopy , with h@xmath23 in emission or li in absorption ; ( iii ) a location above the main - sequence in the hr diagram ; or ( iv ) ir emission that is indicative of a circumstellar disk . l1688 was also observed with _ spitzer _ in the cryogenic mission phase with all four irac channels and the 24@xmath24 m channel of the multiband imaging photometer for spitzer ( mips , * ? ? ? objects classified as ysos from these data @xcite are already contained in the membership list of @xcite . we augment our own _ spitzer _ data reduction with values from the catalog published by the c2d project ( c2d = from cores to disks ; * ? ? ? if we did not obtain a photometric value for an irac band or the @xmath25 m mips , but a value with the quality specifier a , b or c is present in the c2d catalog then we use that value . the data are given in table [ tab : tab2 ] , which specifies if a datapoint is taken from our own data reduction ( g09 : using the pipeline from * ? ? ? * ) or the c2d database . near - ir data is taken from 2mass @xcite and cross - matched by the cluster grinder pipeline @xcite . additionally , we take detections from the ukirt infrared deep sky survey ( ukidss ) galactic cluster survey , data release 9 . the ukidss project is defined in @xcite . ukidss uses the united kingdom infrared telescope ( ukirt ) wide field camera and a photometric system described in @xcite . the pipeline processing and science archive are described in @xcite . we only retain detections with a ` mergedclass ` flag between -3 and 0 . sources brighter than @xmath26 mag can be saturated and we discard the ukidss data for any source that lies above this threshold either in ukidss or 2mass . this leaves us with 2mass data in the range @xmath27 mag and ukidss @xmath28 mag . the luminosity function for both dataset is almost identical from @xmath26 to @xmath29 . for fainter sources , 2mass is incomplete ; ukidss is incomplete for @xmath30 mag . the ysovar data is also cross - matched with data from the simbad service to provide an identification with known objects from the literature . in all cases the matching radius is set to @xmath14 . if a catalog contains multiple entries within @xmath14 of a ysovar source , we match it to the closest catalog entry . in some cases the best cross - match is not obvious . those sources are discussed in appendix [ sect : remarksaboutcrossmatchingindividualsources ] . ukidss has a better spatial resolution than our irac data . there are nine sources where more than one ukidss source is found within the size of the aperture we use for irac photometry . in six cases ( wsb 52 , iso - oph 152 , iso - oph 131 , sstysv j162728.13 - 243719.6 , sstysv j162718.11 - 244814.1 , sstysv j162718.25 - 244955.8 ) the second source is visible in the @xmath31 band , the ukidss band that is closest in wavelength to the irac data , so it is likely that both sources contribute to the observed irac emission . in the remaining three cases ( iso - oph 28 , iso - oph 57 , sstysv j162741.14 - 242038.3 ) the second source is not visible at @xmath31 band . ccccc 1 & ra & deg & & j2000.0 right ascension + 2 & dec & deg & & j2000.0 declination + 3 & name & & & identifier for object + 4 & iau_name & & & j2000.0 iau designation within the ysovar program + 5 & other_names & & & alternative identifiers for object + 6 & c2d_id & & & + 7 & wil08_id & & & wilking et al . ( 2008 ) + 8 & adoc08_aoc & & & j2000.0 iau designation ( jhhmmss.ss+ddmmss.s ) + 9 & ukidss_sourceid & & & + 10 & jmag & mag & @xmath10 & + 11 & e_jmag & mag & @xmath10 & observational uncertainty + 12 & r_jmag & & @xmath10 & data source + 13 & hmag & mag & @xmath11 & + 14 & e_hmag & mag & @xmath11 & observational uncertainty + 15 & r_hmag & & @xmath11 & data source + 16 & kmag & mag & @xmath31 & + 17 & e_kmag & mag & @xmath31 & observational uncertainty + 18 & r_kmag & & @xmath31 & data source + 19 & 3.6mag & mag & @xmath32 m & + 20 & e_3.6mag & mag & @xmath32 m & observational uncertainty + 21 & r_3.6mag & & @xmath32 m & data source + 22 & 4.5mag & mag & @xmath33 m & + 23 & e_4.5mag & mag & @xmath33 m & observational uncertainty + 24 & r_4.5mag & & @xmath33 m & data source + 25 & 5.8mag & mag & @xmath34 m & + 26 & e_5.8mag & mag & @xmath34 m & observational uncertainty + 27 & r_5.8mag & & @xmath34 m & data source + 28 & 8.0mag & mag & @xmath35 m & + 29 & e_8.0mag & mag & @xmath35 m & observational uncertainty + 30 & r_8.0mag & & @xmath35 m & data source + 31 & 24mag & mag & @xmath36 m & + 32 & e_24mag & mag & @xmath36 m & observational uncertainty + 33 & r_24mag & & @xmath36 m & data source + 34 & sedclass & & & ir class according to sed slope + 35 & s1_sedclass & & & ir class according to sed slope ( visibility window 1 ) + 36 & member(ysovar ) & & & cluster membership according to ysovar standard + 37 & standardset & & & source in ysovar standard set ? + 38 & ns1_36 & ct & @xmath32 m & number of datapoints ( visibility window 1 ) + 39 & ns1_45 & ct & @xmath33 m & number of datapoints ( visibility window 1 ) + 40 & maxs1_36 & mag & @xmath32 m & maximum magnitude in lightcurve ( visibility window 1 ) + 41 & mins1_36 & mag & @xmath32 m & minimum magnitude in lightcurve ( visibility window 1 ) + 42 & maxs1_45 & mag & @xmath33 m & maximum magnitude in lightcurve ( visibility window 1 ) + 43 & mins1_45 & mag & @xmath33 m & minimum magnitude in lightcurve ( visibility window 1 ) + 44 & means1_36 & mag & @xmath32 m & mean magnitude ( visibility window 1 ) + 45 & stddevs1_36 & mag & @xmath32 m & standard deviation calculated from non - biased variance ( visibility window 1 ) + 46 & deltas1_36 & mag & @xmath32 m & width of distribution from 10% to 90% ( visibility window 1 ) + 47 & means1_45 & mag & @xmath33 m & mean magnitude ( visibility window 1 ) + 48 & stddevs1_45 & mag & @xmath33 m & standard deviation calculated from non - biased variance ( visibility window 1 ) + 49 & deltas1_45 & mag & @xmath33 m & width of distribution from 10% to 90% ( visibility window 1 ) + 50 & redchi2tomeans1_36 & & @xmath32 m & reduced @xmath22 to mean ( visibility window 1 ) + 51 & redchi2tomeans1_45 & & @xmath33 m & reduced @xmath22 to mean ( visibility window 1 ) + 52 & coherence_time_36 & d & @xmath32 m & decay time of acf ( visibility window 1 ) + 53 & coherence_time_45 & d & @xmath33 m & decay time of acf ( visibility window 1 ) + 54 & s1_stetson_36_45 & & @xmath32 m , @xmath33 m & stetson index for a two - band lightcurve . ( visibility window 1 ) + 55 & s1_cmd_alpha_36_45 & rad & @xmath32 m , @xmath33 m & angle of best - fit line in cmd ( visibility window 1 ) + 56 & s1_cmd_alpha_error_36_45 & rad & @xmath32 m , @xmath33 m & uncertainty on angle ( visibility window 1 ) + 57 & n_36 & ct & @xmath32 m & number of datapoints + 58 & n_45 & ct & @xmath33 m & number of datapoints + 59 & max_36 & mag & @xmath32 m & maximum magnitude in lightcurve + 60 & min_36 & mag & @xmath32 m & minimum magnitude in lightcurve + 61 & max_45 & mag & @xmath33 m & maximum magnitude in lightcurve + 62 & min_45 & mag & @xmath33 m & minimum magnitude in lightcurve + 63 & mean_36 & mag & @xmath32 m & mean magnitude + 64 & stddev_36 & mag & @xmath32 m & standard deviation calculated from non - biased variance + 65 & delta_36 & mag & @xmath32 m & width of distribution from 10% to 90% + 66 & mean_45 & mag & @xmath33 m & mean magnitude + 67 & stddev_45 & mag & @xmath33 m & standard deviation calculated from non - biased variance + 68 & delta_45 & mag & @xmath33 m & width of distribution from 10% to 90% + 69 & redchi2tomean_36 & & @xmath32 m & reduced @xmath22 to mean + 70 & redchi2tomean_45 & & @xmath33 m & reduced @xmath22 to mean + 71 & stetson_36_45 & & @xmath32 m , @xmath33 m & stetson index for a two - band lightcurve . + 72 & cmd_alpha_36_45 & rad & @xmath32 m , @xmath33 m & angle of best - fit line in cmd + 73 & cmd_alpha_error_36_45 & rad & @xmath32 m , @xmath33 m & uncertainty on angle + 74 & teff & k & & effective temperature from literature + 75 & r_teff & & & reference for teff + 76 & x - ray & & & chandra counterpart ? + table [ tab : tab2 ] contains the position , the designation , the flux densities of each source and properties of their lightcurves . the properties of the lightcurve will be discussed in detail in the remainder of this article . most properties of the lightcurve , e.g. mean , minimum and maximum , appear twice . they are calculated once over the entire available lightcurve and once for the first visibility window only ; the fast - cadence sampling is available uniformly for all clusters in the ysovar project and thus values calculated over the fast - cadence only can be compared between clusters ( see , e.g. paper i ) . a subset of the properties of lightcurves with a mean magnitude @xmath37 in irac 1 or irac 2 is shown in table [ tab : tab2small ] . cccccccc cfhtwir - oph 29 & f & yes & 0.57 & 0.55 & 368.58 & 18.61 & 3.20 + [ edj2009 ] 809 & ii & yes & 0.17 & 0.18 & 41.13 & & + wl 6 & i & yes & 0.58 & & 440.74 & & 4.70 + cfhtwir - oph 16 & ii & yes & 0.05 & 0.05 & 2.42 & & + iso - oph 138 & ii & yes & 0.11 & 0.12 & 15.90 & & 1.00 + iso - oph 53 & ii & yes & 0.06 & 0.08 & 5.56 & 1.72 & 1.10 + wsb 52 & ii & yes & 0.20 & 0.24 & 69.45 & 7.81 & 7.80 + wl 4 & ii & yes & 0.46 & 0.38 & 366.61 & 17.97 & 5.80 + iso - oph 137 & i & yes & 0.20 & 0.17 & 65.12 & 5.60 & 1.40 + wl 3 & i & yes & 0.23 & 0.25 & 61.16 & 8.67 & 8.50 + iso - oph 139 & f & yes & 0.12 & 0.14 & 17.48 & 4.10 & 1.60 + iso - oph 51 & f & no & 0.40 & 0.30 & 239.84 & & 4.20 + iso - oph 122 & f & yes & 0.19 & & 45.78 & & 1.10 + wsb 49 & ii & no & 0.23 & 0.18 & 84.90 & & + iso - oph 161 & i & yes & 0.34 & 0.34 & 241.40 & 13.16 & 5.40 + rox 25 & ii & yes & & 0.20 & & & + iso - oph 140 & ii & yes & 0.17 & 0.19 & 42.95 & 5.99 & 4.70 + iso - oph 120 & f & yes & 0.18 & 0.24 & 69.78 & 6.44 & 2.20 + sstysv j162636.08 - 242404.2 & i & no & 0.09 & 0.07 & 6.14 & 1.28 & 0.90 + iso - oph 152 & ii & yes & 0.08 & 0.07 & 5.45 & 0.73 & 1.00 + iso - oph 21 & i & yes & 0.52 & 0.35 & 329.65 & 13.48 & 7.70 + roxn 44 & ii & no & 0.06 & 0.05 & 5.13 & 1.86 & 3.20 + ylw 15 & i & yes & 0.13 & & 34.38 & & 7.20 + [ gy92 ] 30 & i & yes & 0.13 & 0.10 & 12.90 & 2.03 & 3.60 + sstysv j162721.82 - 241842.4 & ii & no & 0.03 & 0.06 & 0.76 & & 1.30 + wl 11 & ii & yes & 0.21 & 0.25 & 28.38 & & + ylw 47 & ii & yes & 0.16 & 0.13 & 49.72 & & 3.10 + iso - oph 35 & ii & yes & 0.06 & 0.06 & 3.68 & & + [ gy92 ] 264 & ii & yes & 0.20 & 0.26 & 62.16 & 7.17 & 2.10 + 2mass j16271881 - 2448523 & iii & no & 0.10 & 0.09 & 4.79 & & + iso - oph 153 & ii & no & 0.29 & 0.23 & 118.17 & 8.42 & 0.70 + sstysv j162622.19 - 242352.2 & iii & no & 0.02 & 0.02 & 0.68 & 0.32 & 0.70 + cfhtwir - oph 74 & ii & no & 0.21 & 0.38 & 3.56 & 1.08 & 5.00 + iso - oph 34 & f & yes & 0.05 & 0.05 & 2.26 & 1.03 & 0.50 + crbr 2322.3 - 1143 & ii & yes & 0.07 & 0.12 & 4.53 & & 2.00 + iso - oph 33 & f & yes & 0.10 & 0.12 & 6.25 & 1.90 & 4.70 + iso - oph 145 & f & yes & 0.36 & 0.41 & 216.30 & 13.03 & 1.80 + roxn 41 & ii & no & 0.05 & 0.03 & 3.02 & 1.04 & 1.30 + iso - oph 144 & f & yes & 0.13 & 0.08 & 21.70 & 3.32 & 1.50 + sstysv j162617.46 - 242314.3 & ii & no & 0.35 & 0.11 & 21.64 & 6.37 & + iso - oph 50 & i & yes & 0.99 & 1.90 & 821.89 & & 5.60 + [ gmm2009 ] oph l1688 30 & i & yes & 0.24 & 0.20 & 42.64 & 5.27 & 3.70 + iso - oph 165 & i & yes & 0.24 & 0.26 & 73.32 & 6.23 & 6.90 + [ edj2009 ] 892 & f & yes & 0.95 & 1.13 & 1084.07 & 33.56 & 7.60 + iso - oph 26 & f & yes & 0.11 & 0.12 & 16.35 & 2.65 & 3.00 + iso - oph 154 & ii & yes & 0.15 & 0.24 & 22.39 & 4.74 & 1.30 + cfhtwir - oph 21 & f & no & 0.06 & 0.05 & 5.10 & & 3.00 + iso - oph 124 & i & yes & 0.17 & 0.19 & 33.31 & 4.76 & 1.20 + wl 13 & ii & yes & 0.11 & & 14.34 & & 1.70 + rox 26 & i & yes & 0.29 & & 120.65 & & 8.40 + iso - oph 37 & i & yes & 0.46 & 0.36 & 228.62 & 11.54 & 6.40 + [ edj2009 ] 824 & f & yes & 0.08 & 0.07 & 5.94 & 2.19 & 3.70 + iso - oph 118 & f & yes & 0.27 & 0.29 & 52.56 & 7.06 & + sstysv j162727.53 - 242611.2 & i & no & 0.31 & 0.27 & 5.03 & 1.46 & 1.10 + iso - oph 52 & f & yes & 0.30 & 0.27 & 110.30 & 9.03 & 4.90 + sstysv j162621.66 - 241820.1 & f & no & 0.23 & 0.28 & 7.15 & & 0.70 + iso - oph 19 & ii & yes & 0.09 & 0.12 & 13.24 & 3.00 & + 2mass j16263046 - 2422571 & f & yes & 0.40 & 0.44 & 185.94 & 12.69 & 4.20 + sstysv j162728.30 - 244029.5 & i & no & 0.52 & 0.54 & 4.72 & 1.97 & 6.20 + we build two l1688 membership lists based on different criteria . the first is defined in paper i and is applied uniformly for all clusters in the ysovar project . sources are treated as cluster members if they fulfill at least one of the following criteria : ( i ) they are classified as ysos by @xcite based on their ir excess in cryogenic mission _ spitzer _ data or ( ii ) they are detected as x - ray sources in _ chandra _ imaging and have a spectral slope compatible with a stellar photosphere ( sed class iii , see section [ sect : spectralslope ] ) . at the distance of l1688 ( we use 120 pc from , but see also discussion in paper i ) , cluster members that are young and thus still magnetically active stars can be detected in x - rays . a total of 57 sources fulfill one or both conditions . in table [ tab : tab2 ] , these objects are marked as `` member ( ysovar ) '' . the main biases in this sample are that the ir criterion selects only those members with disks and not class iii sources , while the _ chandra _ criterion suffers from incomplete spatial coverage and it may include late - type foreground stars . the different biases are a common problem in multiwavelength studies of star forming regions ( see , e.g. , * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? the second membership list is taken from @xcite . on this list , 74 of our 884 sources with _ lightcurves are cluster members ; 51 of those 74 are also included in the ysovar membership list due to their x - ray or ir emission . when we compare properties of members and non - members below without referring to a specific set , then we mean membership as defined by the standard ysovar criteria . six sources in the ysovar standard member set are not part of the @xcite list . more details on those source are given in appendix [ sect : g09notwil ] . on the other hand , all of the sources in @xcite that are not part of the ysovar standard set were selected based on an x - ray detection from observations other than _ chandra _ ( for the specific references see * ? ? ? figure [ fig : hist36 ] shows a histogram of the observed mean magnitudes in @xmath32 m . almost all bright sources are cluster members . the fraction of members drops below 11th mag and no cluster member is found below 14th mag . we expect background sources to be fainter than cluster members because of their larger distance and because they are seen through the cloud , but also fainter sources can not be reliably classified . the thickness of the cloud is inhomogenous . the three primary fields cover roughly @xmath38 mag in the extinction maps from the c2d project @xcite . this correspondes to @xmath39}=1.3 - 2.2 $ ] mag @xcite . at the distance of l1688 , a k5 star with little or no extinction has @xmath40 } = 12.2 $ ] mag according to the evolutionary tracks of and the yso colors from @xcite . thus , even late - k or early - m star members in the cloud are bright enough to be detected . just over 10% of the 884 sources with lightcurves are classified by @xcite at all , because this classification scheme is conservative , representing a set of sources that can be dereddened and classified to a high degree of confidence . however , for many sources , we lack the required spectral coverage . of those sources that can be classified in this way , 16 are class i sources , 36 are class ii sources and 59 are class iii candidates , i.e. , sources with a weak or absent ir excess in their sed ( in this case the ir sed does not provide sufficient information to decide if a star is a yso or a field star ) . ten of those 59 have an x - ray counterpart in our _ chandra _ data . in order to classify all sources , including those not classified in @xcite , paper i defines a simpler approach , which uses the observed colors only . in this scheme , we fit the spectral slope @xmath41 , where @xmath42 is the wavelength and @xmath43 the flux density per unit wavelength interval at that wavelength . we make use of all measured flux densities ( no upper limits ) in the 2 - 24@xmath12 m range , which corresponds to the range from the @xmath4 or @xmath31 filter , which we take from 2mass and/or ukidss , respectively , to the mips 24@xmath12 m channel . we use the flux densities for all _ spitzer _ bands from the observations presented in @xcite ( and we include all sources extracted using this pipeline including those that are not published in @xcite because they are not classified as yso in that work ) or c2d and summarize the new lightcurves by calculating the mean and standard deviation for the new irac1 and irac2 data . thus , sources detected both in the cryogenic mission and in the new dataset will have two datapoints for irac1 and irac2 . if a source is detected in both 2mass and ukidss we use both values for the fit , since they are independent measurements . we perform a least - squares fit and call sources with @xmath44 class i , @xmath45 flat - spectrum ( f ) , @xmath46 class ii sources and @xmath47 class iii candidates . the classifications are given in table [ tab : tab2 ] in two columns . ` s1_sedclass ` presents the derived sed class using all available literature data as described above and the mean of the lightcurves from visibility window 1 for comparison with paper i ; ` sedclass ` uses the same literature data but the mean flux density for the lightcurves calculated for all visibility windows . in this scheme a significantly reddened main - sequence star , which has an intrinsic slope @xmath48 , may appear as class ii object , so this observational classification can not be translated directly into the evolutionary stage of an object . of the remaining sources we find 110 class i , 78 flat - spectrum and 455 class ii sources and 221 class iii candidates . we can not classify 20 sources , because they are seen in one band only . not only the evolutionary status but also other properties of the individual source such as inclination or stellar mass influence the value of @xmath23 . massive stars emit more energetic radiation and can thus change the structure of the accretion disk . however , l1688 is a region without massive ysos @xcite and we define @xmath23 using wavelengths longward of the @xmath31 band far from the peak of the stellar sed , so the shape of the photospheric sed has only negligible influence on the total sed . @xcite simulated different ysos of low mass . their results show that seds depend mostly on the evolutionary stage except for very extreme cases such as stars with an edge - on disk . thus , @xmath23 provides a good proxy for the evolutionary state of the ysos in l1688 . comparing with @xcite , the resulting classification is very similar , particularly for the class i and flat - spectrum sources . most sources with a spectral slope @xmath49 according to our slope - fitting are class i sources in both classification schemes . with two exceptions our flat - spectrum sources are either class i or ii in @xcite . of the 52 sources with a spectral slope between -1.6 and -0.3 , 21 are also called class ii by @xcite , but 30 are class iii in that paper , indicating that a significant fraction of what we call class ii might indeed be reddened background stars . the general agreement between the more complex classification scheme and the observed spectral slope is also found for other star forming regions ( paper i ) . we use three different methods to detect variability in all lightcurves , independent of their membership status or sed slope . sources are considered variable , if they fullfill at least one of the following conditions : ( i ) a two - band lightcurve exisits and their stetson index is larger than 0.9 ( sect . [ sect : stetsonindex ] ) ; ( ii ) only a one - band lightcurve exisits and @xmath50 ( sect . [ sect : chi2 ] ) ; ( iii ) the lightcurve is periodic ( sect . [ sect : periodicity ] ) . sources in the target fields are observed in irac 1 and irac 2 almost simultaneously ( within a few minutes ) . for those sources , we calculate the stetson index @xmath51 with points weighted evenly @xcite : @xmath52 where the sum is taken over all @xmath53 pairs of observations in irac1 and irac2 with observed magnitudes @xmath54 and @xmath55 and uncertainties @xmath56 and @xmath57 ; @xmath58 denotes the sign of @xmath59 . @xmath59 is the product of the normalized residuals in both bands : @xmath60 here @xmath61 denotes the error - weighted mean of all irac 1 magnitudes and @xmath62 the error - weighted mean of all irac 2 magnitudes . the stetson index is very robust to observational errors since those are unlikely to affect both bands in the same way . following paper i , we define a source as variable if @xmath63 . in paper i , this is calculated over the first visibility window only ; in this article we use the lightcurve from all four visibility windows . the stetson index calculated for the first visibility window only can be found in table [ tab : tab2 ] in column ` s1_stetson_36_45 ` and for the entire lightcurve in column ` stetson_36_45 ` . figure [ fig : stetsonlcs ] shows examples of lightcurves that are classified as variable according to the stetson index . in the first visibility window , we find 34 sources to be variable , that is 18% of all lightcurves where we can calculate the stetson index . the number is similar ( 38 sources , 18% ) if we consider all observing visibility windows . this is not surprising , given that the stetson index is designed to be a `` robust '' statistic that is little influenced by a small number of datapoints , and compared to the first visibility window , the other visibility windows only contribute a small number of datapoints . we caution that equation [ eqn : stetson ] will introduce a systematic bias in such a way that a source that is variable in only one band will not be recognized as variable . [ sect : chi2 ] for sources outside the primary target fields or for sources which are too bright or too faint in one irac channel , the stetson index can not be calculated . for those sources we rely on the reduced chi - squared value to detect variability : @xmath64 instrumental uncertainties lead to a non - gaussian error distribution , so we use a conservative cut - off and mark sources as variable only if @xmath65 ( paper i ) . using this metric , we find 22 sources that exhibit variability in irac1 and 18 that exhibit variability in irac2 . for comparison , we note that of the 38 sources classified as variable according to their stetson index in the last section , 34 are also variable according to the @xmath22 test for their irac1 lightcurve and 37 according to their irac2 lightcurve . the @xmath66 calculated for the first visibility window only can be found in table [ tab : tab2 ] in column ` redchi2tomeans1_36 ` and ` redchi2tomeans1_45 ` for irac i and irac 2 , respectively , and for the entire lightcurve in columns ` redchi2tomean_36 ` and ` redchi2tomean_45 ` , again for irac 1 and irac 2 , respectively . examples are shown in figure [ fig : chi2lc ] . if we fit a linear slope instead of comparing to the mean ( i.e. a constant ) , the results are the same . many sources have significantly larger values of @xmath66 for the whole observation series than within one visibility window , indicating a constant luminosity over 40 days , but a change over timescales between six months and two years . ccccc cfhtwir - oph 29 & [ 3.6]-[4.5 ] & 2.6 & 0.03 & f + iso - oph 138 & [ 3.6 ] & 3.3 & 0.00 & ii + sstysv j162636.08 - 242404.2 & [ 3.6 ] & 4.1 & 0.00 & i + iso - oph 152 & [ 3.6 ] & 4.7 & 0.03 & ii + [ gy92 ] 30 & [ 3.6 ] & 14.5 & 0.00 & i + wl 11 & [ 4.5 ] & 3.0 & 0.01 & ii + 2mass j16271881 - 2448523 & [ 4.5 ] & 6.4 & 0.00 & iii + sstysv j162622.19 - 242352.2 & [ 4.5 ] & 6.1 & 0.00 & iii + iso - oph 34 & [ 3.6 ] & 2.2 & 0.00 & f + iso - oph 33 & [ 4.5 ] & 2.4 & 0.02 & f + roxn 41 & [ 3.6 ] & 6.5 & 0.00 & ii + iso - oph 154 & [ 3.6 ] & 5.6 & 0.00 & ii + iso - oph 124 & [ 3.6 ] & 3.4 & 0.00 & i + wl 13 & [ 3.6 ] & 10.7 & 0.00 & ii + lastly , we search for periodicity in the fast - cadence ( visibility window 1 ) lightcurves using a lomb - scargle periodogram ; again , see paper i for details . we require a false alarm probability @xmath67 and to further reduce the number of false positives , we additionally run a period detection of all lightcurves on the nasa exoplanet archive periodogram service . this service employs several algorithms because each algorithm is particularly suited to a different signal shape ( see paper i or the website for details on the other algorithms ) . we also calculate the autocorrelation function of each signal . we find that the lomb - scargle periodogram is advantageous for lightcurves with @xmath68 points as is the case for most of our data . we require that at least one of three supplementary algorithms that we run retrieves a periodicity with a similar timescale ( see paper i for details ) . we only search for periods between 0.1 and 14.5 days , so that at least three periods fit in each visibility window . allowing longer periods leads to the detection of many long - term trends , where the data do not show that these trends are actually periodic . finally , all algorithmically detected periodicity is vetted by eye . if periods are found in multiple bands , we report the period in irac 1 , which is generally the most reliable due to the lower measurement uncertainties . if irac 1 does not reveal a periodicity , we report the value for the irac 2 lightcurve , and , as a last resort the period found in the [ 3.6]-[4.5 ] color to include objects where a periodic signal is overlayed by a long - term trend so that it is undetectable in each individual channel , but might be visible in the color . the final list of adopted periods is given in table [ tab : period ] . it contains sources from all sed classes . we find 14 sources that show a periodic behavior in the first visibility window , but this periodicity is not stable over more than one visibility window . the datapoints taken in the first visibility window follow the folded period much better than the data from the later visibility windows , indicating that the period is not stable for longer than a few months . in roxn 41 , the datapoints of the later visibility windows , folded with the same period , seem to follow a different , yet clearly defined lightcurve with a similar period . ten periodic sources have information in both irac bands . eight of those are already classified as variable by the stetson index . three out of four sources with data in one band only are variable according to the @xmath66 test . the remaining two sources with information in both irac bands show periodicty , but fail the stetson index test because a larger variability amplitude is required for a significant detection in stetson index , which does not make any assumption about the form of the variability compared with the lomb - scargle periodigram , that only detects periodic signals . equally , the remaining source with data in only one band fails the @xmath66 test , because the @xmath66 test also requires a larger variability amplitude for a significant detection than the lomb - scarge periodogram . the number of datapoints in visibility windows 2 , 3 , and 4 is too low to search for periodicity in those visibility windows alone . figure [ fig : periodlc ] shows the phase - folded lightcurve in one band for six periodic sources where the periodicity is significant in a single band . figure [ fig : periodcolorlc ] shows the phased lightcurve for , where the period is seen only in the color term [ 3.6]-[4.5 ] . most of the periods found in table [ tab : period ] are in the range 3 - 7 days . only two sources have longer periods of 11 and 14 days . the largest amplitude is around 0.3 mag , and the smallest around 0.05 mag . all periodic sources except roxn 41 , sstysv j162636.08 - 242404.2 , 2mass j16271881 - 2448523 , and sstysv j162622.19 - 242352.2 are cluster members according to our membership criteria . roxn 41 and sstysv j162636.08 - 242404.2 have class i and ii seds , respectively . all but cfhtwir - oph 29 ( see appendix [ sect : g09notwil ] ) , sstysv j162636.08 - 242404.2 ( see appendix [ sect : g09notwil ] ) , and 2mass j16271881 - 2448523 ( no information beyond the @xmath69 magnitudes is available in the literature ) are cluster members according to @xcite . ten of the 56 cluster members are periodic ; in total there are 14 periodic sources out of 60 sources that are variable in the first visibility window . in comparison , @xcite find 18% of all variable stars to be periodic in @xmath70 monitoring of the orion a molecular cloud with a similar time coverage as we have for l1688 . @xcite find a third of all variable stars in l1688 to be periodic ; due to their longer time baseline , @xcite are sensitive to different periods , but only 4 out of their 32 periods have values that are outside of the range we could detect see their table . we are sensitive to periods of up to 14.5 days here . the largest group of lightcurves in the sample of l1688 does not have any significant variability . the lower limit where variability is detected depends on the brightness of the object - fainter sources need a stronger relative variability due to the larger measurement uncertainties . paper i presents monte - carlo simulations to show that the stetson test finds variability when the amplitude is a few times larger than the average uncertainty ; the exact number depends on the signal shape . for example , the variability in a source that switches between two discrete levels will be detected when the amplitude is at least twice the uncertainty ( @xmath71 mag for a star with magnitude 14 ) . if data from only one band are available , the step size must be more than four times the uncertainty to be found by the @xmath22-test ( @xmath72 mag for a star with magnitude 14 . ) . given the observing cadence , the monte - carlo simulations show that we are sensitive to periods between 0.1 and 14.5 days ( paper i ) . in summary , we call a source variable if it is either periodic with a low false alarm probability ( 14 sources ) or fulfills one of the following conditions : sources with simultaneous data in two bands need to have a stetson index @xmath73 ( 34 sources in the ysovar standard set fast cadence data and 38 sources in total ) and sources without simultaneous data need to have @xmath65 ( 22 sources in the ysovar standard set fast cadence data and 29 sources in total ) . we consider the lightcurves for all 882 distinct sources with at least five datapoints in at least one irac band . of those lightcurves , 70 are classified as variable ; 56 sources are cluster members according to the ysovar criteria ( 44 of them are variable ) and 73 sources are cluster members according to @xcite ( 47 of them are variable ) . both membership samples have considerable overlap . in the following subsections , we compare properties of the lightcurves between different sed classes . in most cases , the lightcurves of irac1 ( 3.6@xmath12 m ) and irac2 ( @xmath6 m ) have very similar properties . figure [ fig : probvarsed ] contains the variability fraction sorted by sed class ( see section [ sect : spectralslope ] ) . within each class , the population is sub - divided into previously identified members , bright ( @xmath74 mag in @xmath32 m or @xmath33 m ) stars not previously identified as members , and faint ( @xmath75 mag ) stars not previously identified as members . sources are considered variable if they have a low false alarm probability for periodicity or a stetson index @xmath73 ( if simultaneous data in irac 1 and irac 2 exist ) or @xmath76 ( if no simultaneous data exist ) . note that the classes shown here are based on the observed sed and thus background non - member stars seen through the cloud might appear red ( like a class ii source ) even if their intrinsic sed slope is compatible with sed class iii . no star classified as a member is fainter than 14 mag . the observed fraction of variable stars as a function of sed class is the best guess for the probability to find variability for a star of a given sed class . we calculate the uncertainty for the probability based on the observed number of variable stars @xmath77 in a bin with @xmath53 total sources as follows : if the true probability for a source in the bin to be variable is @xmath78 , then the probability to observe @xmath77 variables in @xmath53 stars is given by @xmath79 , which follows a binomial distribution : @xmath80 the peak of this distribution is @xmath81 . we then calculate the boundaries of the confidence interval @xmath82 for @xmath78 such that @xmath83 and the area under the curve includes 68% of the probability . those uncertainty ranges are shown in figure [ fig : probvarsed ] . almost all known cluster members are variable ; the fraction of variables is decreasing slightly from class i to ii . there are five class iii members and none of them shows variability . this is compatible with the variability fraction observed for class iii non - members . by definition , sources with a class iii sed do not have a large ir excess over a stellar photosphere , thus they are not expected to harbor a substantial disk or show disk - related variability . however , even field stars can show significant variability , at least in the near - ir . @xcite find 1.6% of all field stars to be variable in @xmath69 . this includes eclipsing systems , stars with unusually large photospheric spots and other unidentified variables . all effects that influence the @xmath69 lightcurve are likely also visible in the mid - ir . our fraction of variable objects with a class iii sed is similar ( 1.8% ) to what wolk et al . found . in the optical and near - ir , the fraction of variable field stars is lower than that value . _ spitzer _ observations of other young clusters also find that younger stars are more variable , but with a lower variability fraction . @xcite find only 70% of all stars with disks in their onc sample to have detectable variability . @xcite find 60% in ic 348 and @xcite find @xmath84% of all members in ngc 2264 to be variable in the irac bands . all three clusters are located at larger distances and thus observations are less sensitive to small variations , the observations of @xcite are more densely sampled and thus provide a better signal . in l1688 , a k5 star with little extinction will have a magnitude of 12.2 in @xmath5 m using the evolutionary tracks of and the yso colors from @xcite . in this magnitude range , variability down to 0.05 mag can be detected ( paper i ) . in contrast , for the same star in ic 348 , the variability has to be about twice as large to be detected and three times as large to the detected in the onc . of course , even our observations miss the faint end of the distribution . thus , it seems likely that essentially all ysos show substantial mid - ir variability on timescales of days to weeks . sources with a class iii sed are not contaminated by disk - bearing stars , since reddening by the cloud can only increase the spectral slope @xmath23 but never hide an existing ir excess . the larger fraction of non - member variable objects in the other classes in figure [ fig : probvarsed ] thus shows that the membership lists are incomplete . one caveat here is that the class iii sources in the sample of members are selected in a different way than the other classes . if true class iii cluster members with x - ray emission ( that are included in our member sample ) are systematically less variable than class iii members where we do not detect x - ray emission ( that are therefore not included in the member sample ) , that would also lead to a lower observed variability fraction in class iii member sources . however , given the size of the observed effect in variability such a bias seems to be unlikely to be the sole reason for the observed distribution . the observed probability that a source is variable for all classes of bright non - members ( blue bars ) is consistent with around 5% the fact that this barely changes with the sed class , quite unlike the distribution for the cluster members , indicates that unidentified cluster members can not make up a large fraction of the non - member sample since they would bias the observed variability fraction to higher values for the earlier classes . the vastly different number of sources in the different bins makes it highly unlikely that each bin is contaminated by the same fraction of class i - ii cluster members . the sample of faint stars has almost the same fraction of variable sources in every sed class . the low fraction can be explained by two effects . first , variability of faint sources can not be reliably detected unless the amplitude is exceptionally large . second , as most cluster members are brighter than 14 mag , the faint sample contains fewer unrecognized cluster members than the sample of brighter sources . figure [ fig : meanampsed ] shows that there is a wide distribution of amplitudes in ysos of class i , f and ii . the error bars in this figure represent the standard deviation of the mean amplitudes within one class . amplitude and standard deviation in the figure are measured in magnitudes ; a median amplitude of 0.1 mag means that the flux in @xmath33 m varies by 10% for a typical source . for members , the variability amplitude is larger in class i sources than in flat - spectrum and class ii sources , where the amplitude is still larger than in class iii sources . also , the spread of the amplitudes in class i and f is much larger than for class ii and iii . for non - members , the observed amplitudes seem to follow a similar , but less pronounced trend . this suggests that the non - member category still includes not only reddened background objects with an intrinsic class iii sed , but also some unidentified cluster members . indeed , we propose that all variable class i , f and ii sources are members and table [ tab : newmembers ] lists those new members that are neither contained in our ysovar standard membership set ( see table [ tab : tab2 ] ) nor in @xcite . however , for consistency , we do not modify our sample of members at this point and continue to treat the sources in the table as non - members for the remainder of the analysis . two of the objects in the table , and were suggested as a @xmath7 oph substellar candidate members by , the remaining objects have not been studied before . in summary , the probability for any given source to be observed as a mid - ir variable decreases little between class i and ii sources , but the mean amplitude as well as the differences within a class are much larger for sources which have more circumstellar material . cccc 246.88244 & -24.79978 & sstysv j162731.78 - 244759.2 & ii + 246.64060 & -24.31667 & sstysv j162633.74 - 241900.0 & ii + 246.84236 & -24.78363 & sstysv j162722.16 - 244701.0 & ii + 246.59001 & -24.49297 & sstysv j162621.60 - 242934.7 & ii + 246.65036 & -24.40117 & sstysv j162636.08 - 242404.2 & i + 246.84092 & -24.31180 & sstysv j162721.82 - 241842.4 & ii + 246.84135 & -24.78713 & sstysv j162721.92 - 244713.6 & ii + 246.84336 & -24.64383 & cfhtwir - oph 74 & ii + 246.90225 & -24.64854 & sstysv j162736.53 - 243854.7 & ii + 246.57278 & -24.38732 & sstysv j162617.46 - 242314.3 & ii + 246.67446 & -24.25616 & sstysv j162641.86 - 241522.1 & ii + 246.91134 & -24.55516 & sstysv j162738.72 - 243318.5 & ii + 246.60121 & -24.26383 & cfhtwir - oph 21 & f + 246.88281 & -24.34855 & sstysv j162731.87 - 242054.7 & f + 246.86474 & -24.43647 & sstysv j162727.53 - 242611.2 & i + 246.59027 & -24.30560 & sstysv j162621.66 - 241820.1 & f + 246.86794 & -24.67487 & sstysv j162728.30 - 244029.5 & i + next , we will look at the timescales of the lightcurves . the list of periodic sources contains objects of all evolutionary stages , but is too small to recognize any trends in the period with evolutionary stage . we calculate the discrete auto - correlation function @xmath85 for each fast - cadence ( visibility window 1 ) lightcurve to characterise the time - scale in all sources , not just the periodic ones . one complication here is that our data are unevenly sampled . in order to calculate the @xmath86 we linearly interpolate the lightcurve on a grid with time steps of 0.1 days . this process can change the properties of the lightcurves on short timescales . however , for most lightcurves the relevant timescales are longer than the distance between two observations ( 0.1 to 0.8 days ) . we use the following definition of the @xmath86 @xmath87 where @xmath53 is the total number of points in the lightcurve @xmath88 with a mean of @xmath61 and a standard deviation of @xmath89 . in the discrete @xmath86 @xmath90 is the number of timesteps . by definition @xmath91 and the @xmath86 decays for longer time - lags @xmath90 . we take the first value of @xmath90 with @xmath92 as the characteristic time - scale for a lightcurve . a more common definition would be to use the position of the first local maximum in the @xmath86 , but due to the low number of datapoints in our lightcurves , the noise in the @xmath86 is large and this value is often not well defined . while our definition might not give us the timescale of the physical processes at work , the @xmath86 timescale still provides relative comparisons . we find that the average @xmath86 timescale decreases from 4 days for class i sources to one day for class iii sources ( figure [ fig : acf ] ) . a more detailed analysis of stochastic and quasi - periodic properties of the lightcurves is beyond the scope of the current paper ( for a discussion of these properties in @xmath70 lightcurves , see * ? ? ? the majority of the stars included in our data show no significant variability , and we exclude them from further discussion . the remaining stars are definitely variable , with light curve shapes that display a variety of morphologies . visual inspection , and some quantitative analysis , allows us to group these stars into sets with similar light curve morphologies - which can be the first step in attaching physical mechanisms as the cause of the observed variability . based on a near - ir ( @xmath69 ) monitoring campaign of similar cadence and duration to ours , @xcite identified four light curve morphological classes : ( a ) periodic ; ( b ) quasi - periodic - which they defined as stars with cyclic brightening and fading , but where the frequency and amplitude of the variations varied from cycle to cycle ; ( c ) long - duration - stars with relatively long term monotonic changes in brightness over weeks or months , with eventual changes in sign of the variability ; ( d ) stochastic - which indicated all other variability types , where no obvious pattern to the variability was present . in another recent paper , @xcite analysed a @xmath93 day monitoring campaign for the star - forming region ngc 2264 , using optical data from corot and ir data from irac , to assign light curve morphology classes to their young star set . their proposed light curve morphologies were : ( i ) periodic - stars whose light curves show periodic waveforms whose amplitude and shape are unchanging or only change in minor ways over the 30 day observing window . these light curves were ascribed generally to cold spots on the stellar photosphere ; ( ii ) dippers - stars showing a well - defined maximum brightness , upon which are superposed flux dips of variable shape and amplitude . these are sub - divided into stars where the flux dips occur at an approximately constant period - designated as quasi - periodic systems - and stars with no obvious periodicity to the dips - designated aperiodic . in previous literature , these two sub - classes , or portions of them , have been referred to as aa tau systems and ux ori systems , respectively ; ( iii ) short duration bursters - stars with relatively well - defined minimum light curve levels , superposed on which are brief ( hours to day ) flux increases , attributed to accretion bursts . see @xcite for further discussion of this set ; ( iv ) quasi - periodic variables - stars lacking a well - defined maximum brightness but showing periodic variability whose waveform changes shape and amplitude from cycle to cycle ; ( v ) stochastic - stars with prominent luminosity changes on a variety of timescales , with no preference for `` up '' or `` down '' . ( vi ) long timescale variability - stars with slow ( weeks to months ) changes in brightness . while there are some clear similarities in the two schemes , their usage of the terms quasi - periodic and stochastic are not the same , and light curves described as belonging to those classes in one scheme would not necessarily be so classified in the other scheme . it will be important to resolve these nomenclature issues in the future , perhaps in the same manner as was done for sorting out similar issues on classifying pre - main sequence disk sed morphologies ( evans et al . 2009 ) . in the meantime , we must choose which scheme to adopt and be clear that is what we have done . for this paper , we adopt the @xcite scheme . periodic lightcurves are described in section [ sect : midirvariability ] and examples can be seen in figure [ fig : periodlc ] . examples of quasi - periodic lightcurves are shown in figure [ fig : morelcs ] . shows variability with a timescale @xmath94 days in the first half of the first visibility window , but around mjd 55316 , the flux increases significantly and this rise masks out any periodicity . the dip around mjd 55325 again has a similar duration as those observed in the beginning of the visibility window . the other two sources shown might be similar , but the signal - to - noise is not as good . other sources are variable , but no preferred timescale for the variability is discernible . and 51 ( figure [ fig : morelcs2 ] ) are examples of this aperiodic behavior . in yet other cases , the timescale of the variability is so long that we can not decide if a feature is a singular event or part of a recurring pattern . good examples of this are wl 4 and , which are shown in figure [ fig : cmd ] . in some cases , we see short duration features in the lightcurve in addition to a longer trend . this can either be a brightening ( e.g. mjd 55303 and 55311 in , figure [ fig : morelcs2 ] ) or short dips in the lightcurve that last between one and ten days ( in the same figure ) . like @xcite , we find that even strongly periodic sources are not perfect clocks in the mid - ir in that the amplitude can vary from cycle to cycle . there might also be phase shifts from visibility window to visibility window . in a very similar study to the one we present here , @xcite observed ic 348 over a 40 day window with irac1 and 2 and find 25% of the variable stars are likely periodic . here we find a similar division ; 10 of 52 members are strongly periodic . we present the first mid - ir monitoring of l1688 , but the field has been monitored before in the near - ir . figure [ fig : amplitudekvs36 ] compares the @xmath4 band amplitude found in 2mass data taken between 1997 and 2001 @xcite and the @xmath31 band amplitude observed at ukirt between 2005 and 2006 with the amplitude of our @xmath32 m lightcurves . given the different bands , it is not surprising that the absolute value of the amplitude differs , but there is a good correlation such that the sources with the largest @xmath31 or @xmath4 band amplitudes in earlier observations also have the largest amplitudes in the irac bands five to ten years later . in most objects , color changes are small or happen in parallel with luminosity changes ( section [ sect : colorchangesandreddening ] ) , so the @xmath31 or @xmath4 band and the [ 3.6 ] variability should be strongly correlated . figure [ fig : amplitudekvs36 ] shows that the amplitude of the variability is relatively stable over at least one decade . @xcite used a larger number of observations than and observe a larger spread between a typical yso s brightest and faintest @xmath31-band magnitude , indicating that the longest timescale of variability is longer than the time span of the observations . @xcite noted that roughly 6% of the stars in ic 348 had data which indicated significant changes in the source s mid - ir flux over the three year interval since the last irac observation . @xcite also displayed numerous examples of stars which showed continuous change over the course of at least one observing visibility window . all this shows that the amplitude of variability of a given source may evolve over very long timescales , but is consistent over at least one decade . ysos apparently do not switch between highly variable and much less variable states . of time - variable extinction . the largest @xmath95 observed is 1 , but for clearity only the region to @xmath96 mag is shown . _ bottom _ : in this panel the length of each line gives the sed class of that object . only cluster members have slopes where the source bluens as it fades . [ fig : cmdslope],title="fig:",scaledwidth=40.0% ] of time - variable extinction . the largest @xmath95 observed is 1 , but for clearity only the region to @xmath96 mag is shown . _ bottom _ : in this panel the length of each line gives the sed class of that object . only cluster members have slopes where the source bluens as it fades . [ fig : cmdslope],title="fig:",scaledwidth=40.0% ] for sources in the primary target fields , the observations in @xmath5 m and @xmath6 m are separated by only a few minutes . for those sources , we compare the color and the magnitude in the @xmath5 m band in a color - magnitude diagram ( cmd ) ( figures [ fig : morelcs ] and [ fig : cmd ] ) . in some cases , the color is fairly stable within one visibility window , but changes between visibility windows ; in others the timescale of variability is much shorter and color changes are seen within one visibility window as well . for non - variable sources , the cmd forms a point cloud with the size set by the photometric uncertainties , but for variable sources , the shape of the cmd can reveal the physical cause of the variability for example , if a disk warp or accretion funnel passes in front of a yso , we expect its color to become redder as it becomes fainter . if the absorber has the same gas and dust properties as the inter - stellar medium ( ism ) and absorbs star and inner disk at the same time , then the datapoints in the cmd follow a line with the slope of the interstellar reddening law ( e.g. * ? ? ? * ) . in each cmd , the observational data ( i1 , i1-i2 ) are fit to a line segment using an orthogonal distance regression method that takes the errors in both the x and y directions into account . we calculate the length in magnitudes of the line segment excluding the 10% of the data that are outliers on either side . the cmd slopes of the 37 sources with a well - defined slope are shown in figure [ fig : cmdslope ] . the x and the y axis in the cmd are correlated , because they both depend on the @xmath5 m magnitude so sources which are noise - dominated would show a slope of @xmath97 . no source is seen in this region . from a total of 42 variable sources with cmds with at least ten datapoints , 37 can be fitted with a formal uncertainty on the best fit slope below @xmath98 . in four of the five sources with a statistical error on the slope in the cmd @xmath99 , the color variability is dominated by observational uncertainties ; the remaining source iso - oph 140 is discussed below . as can be seen in figure [ fig : cmd ] , even in those sources with a well defined slope in the cmd , the scatter around the best linear fit is larger than the measurement uncertainties ; individual visibility windows are systematically above or below the fitted line . the slopes shown in figure [ fig : cmdslope ] can be separated ( somewhat arbitrarily ) in two groups . one group becomes redder when the sources are fainter with slopes comparable to the ism reddening . this group contains almost all variables that are not classified as cluster members in section [ sect : l1688membership ] . most sources in this group have class i or flat - spectrum seds ( bottom panel ) . sources that bluen ( we use the term `` bluen '' as a verb to mean that a source comes bluer similar to the common expressions `` redden '' or `` reddening '' ) when they are fainter are mostly class ii and flat spectrum sources . figure [ fig : morelcs ] shows the lightcurves and cmds for two of the bluening sources , and . the top panel in figure [ fig : cmdslope ] quantifies the magnitude of the reddening or bluening observed in each source . for a source where the slope in the cmd is compatible with ism reddening , this can be interpreted as the @xmath95 of the intervening material . a range of values is observed , but in most sources it is @xmath49 mag . no significant difference in vector length is seen between sources that bluen or redden when they dim . we discuss the physical mechanisms that could cause these slopes in section [ sect : scenariosforcolorchanges ] . comparing the amplitudes of all sources in figure [ fig : cmdslope ] that either redden or bluen over the full time span of the observations , we do not find significant differences in value or distribution of the variability amplitudes . similar to our results , find reddening and bluening slopes in the cmd in their @xmath100 monitoring , but compared to figure [ fig : cmdslope ] they see a higher fraction of stars that bluen as they dim ( 33/49 ) . only six sources have well defined slopes in both their study and ours . in the data of , all of them belong to the group that bluen with lower fluxes . in five cases , our data agree . in contrast , roxn 44 reddens in our observations , so its behavior changed over the time interval of five years , or it is behaving differently in the near and mid - ir . is the only source with a statistical error on the slope in the cmd @xmath99 where the color variability is not dominated by observational uncertainties , but where the slope varies substantially over time . its lightcurve and cmd for the first visibility window are shown in figure [ fig : cmdsquare ] . it has a class ii sed slope and is a low mass yso ( spectral type m1 ; * ? ? ? there is no single slope in the cmd ; instead the source seems to switch between different modes . initially , the luminosity drops sharply , while the color becomes slightly bluer . the behavior changes around mjd 55305 . for the next 15 days , the source becomes redder and dimmer , but the slope is less steep than the ism reddening law . the evolution is not monotonic , but a brightening ( e.g. around mjd 55313 ) corresponds to a bluer color and the source reddens as it dims . at the end of this period , the brightness increases again sharply and the slope in the cmd is comparable to the period mjd 55295 to 55305 : the source becomes noticeably redder with higher luminosity . in the last 10 days of the monitoring , the source again has a slope close to the ism reddening law . its luminosity continues to increase and the color bluens until it has a similar color and luminosity as it did at the beginning of the monitoring . this closes the circle in the cmd . this is the only source in our sample where we observe multiple changes of the reddening slope over time . in this case , variability similar to ism reddening corresponds to slow changes in luminosity , while the other direction of the slope in the cmd is associated with faster luminosity changes . now we discuss the lightcurves with the largest changes in magnitude in our sample . wl 4 , shown in figure [ fig : cmd ] , has an outburst event consisting of a brightness increase by about 0.6 mag and bluening at the same time . the rise and fall take only a few days and the entire outburst lasts about a month . [ edj2009 ] 892 ( shown in the same figure ) presents a slow rise by about 0.2 mag in @xmath33 m and smooth decay over two years where the source gradually bluens ( although more activity between visibility windows can not be excluded ) . there is an indication of a slow and smooth increase in brightness again in the last observing visibility window , pointing to a recurring phenomenon . these timescales are much longer than the dynamical time in the inner disk , so they are presumably driven by disk phenomena that originate at larger radii . @xcite identified a few such bursting or fading events in their analysis of ysovar data for the orion nebula cluster ( onc ) and they have also been observed in the optical @xcite . the physical cause is not known yet . @xcite find a few lightcurves that match theoretical predictions for short mass accretion events , but without simultaneous spectroscopy this is hard to prove . the best example presented here , wl 4 , becomes bluer during the burst , but the opposite happens for wl 3 , which otherwise has a similar lightcurve . thus , it is likely that different mechanisms cause these burst events . the reddening sources in figure [ fig : cmdslope ] have slopes that are roughly compatible with the slope of an interstellar reddening law . small deviations can be explained by modifications of the dust - to - gas ratio or the grain size and composition . this is commonly observed in individual young stars and star forming regions as a whole @xcite . the most prominent example of a class ii source where the extinction changes on timescales of days is . in this case , the absorption dip is periodic and caused by an inner disk warp partially occulting the star . many examples of comparable lightcurves have been found in the onc by @xcite and in ngc 2264 by @xcite . these authors call objects with absorption events in the lightcuve `` dippers '' . we observe reddening on timescales of months to years in about half of all sources with a well - defined slope in the cmd . an example of that is shown in the top right panel of figure [ fig : cmd ] . we do not know the inclination of the objects in our sample , but if it is close to edge - on , this might be caused by an asymmetric disk similar to aa tau . the required warp or local change in scale height that lets some gas and dust protrude above the average disk height , could be caused by a low - mass star , brown dwarf or planetary mass object orbiting in the disk ( e.g. * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? alternatively , vortices in the disk or dust traps can also change the local scale height . changes in the optical brightness and color of a yso are often attributed to spots , either hot accretion spots or cold magnetic spots , rotating in and out of view or to time - variable extinction ( e.g. * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? if the reddening increases and , at the same time , the visible fraction of the hot spot decreases , then the resulting slope in the cmd would be intermediate between ism reddening and colorless . since spots on the star can not explain sources that bluen as they dim , this observed phenomenon must be related to the disk . several parameters of the inner disk could be time variable . the most obvious one is the accretion rate . however , the direct effect of increased accretion is a larger accretion spot , which would make the star bluer and brighter , not fainter . also , @xcite find no relation between mid - ir lightcurves and spectroscopic accretion tracers in their limited sample . this indicates that the relevant parameter can change without affecting the accretion rate . in the mid - ir , we see the optically thick dust at the inner disk edge . because the disk is heated over its entire vertical height at the inner edge while only the disk surface absorbs radiation at larger radii , it can form a puffed - up inner rim that reaches above the usual disk scale height and casts a shadow on the remaining disk , reducing the luminosity at longer wavelengths ( e.g. * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? if this rim grows , it intercepts more stellar light . thus , the emission from the inner wall increases and the emission from the outer disk decreases , which results in bluer colors . since the total emitting area also decreases , the source can become bluer and fainter . @xcite also present radiative transfer models with hot spots and warped disks that reproduce features of the observed lightcurves . alternatively , @xcite suggested a non - axisymmetric model . if the emission from the stellar photosphere is stronger at some longitudes due to a strong accretion spot or a spot from magnetic activity on the star , it irradiates the inner disk like a searchlight beam and causes the dust at this longitude to retreat . the result is a disk where the inner rim is broken at one ( or several ) positions . this would reduce the emission in @xmath5 m , but cause more energy to be emitted at a larger radius , where the dust is cooler on average and thus emits at longer wavelengths such as @xmath6 m . in this way , the source can become redder as it brightens . there is one group of ysos , the so - called ux ori ( uxor ) variables where several members have been observed to bluen when they fade in optical observations . this can be explained by a larger fraction of scattered light that contributes to the observed sed in their faint state . a similar scenario for the ysos discussed here requires , first , scattering by relatively large grains ( @xmath101 mm ) , because only for large grains radiation at @xmath32 m will be scattered more than radiation at @xmath33 m . grains this large will be present in the disk , but not at all radii and all disk heights . second , for this mechanism to work , a large fraction of the ir radiation must be scattered light and not intrinsic emission . in contrast , many bluening sources are class i to flat - spectrum sources , where the ir luminosity is comparable to the total stellar irradiation . none of the simple models presented so far offers a convincing explanation of the observed lightcurves and cmds . however , detailed simulations that take into account turbulent transport processes in the disk and different dust species with a complete chemical network have not yet been performed . the real situation is likely to be much more complex than sketched above . since different dust species form and sublimate with different speeds and at different temperatures , time variable irradiation can actually cause a very complex mixture of species with different opacities , which will not react linearly to increased irradiation . such a complex network might cause a delayed and non - linear response of the disk , which masks the underlying relation between accretion and disk emission . the characteristics of the time variability in the lightcurves could be related to the spectral type of the central star as hotter stars irradiate the disk with harder spectra . we compared the 90% quantiles of the observed @xmath6 m magnitudes for those sources in our sample that have spectroscopically determined spectral types from @xcite . we use the relation between spectral type and @xmath102 from @xcite . this gives values for ten objects in our sample and we do not find a correlation in this set . similarly , @xcite do not identify any trends in infarared variability versus effective temperature among few myr old ngc 2264 stars . in apparent contrast , @xcite find that the variability in [ 3.6 ] and [ 4.5 ] increases with increasing @xmath102 , but they show that this trend probably does not reflect a change in disk properties , but is instead due to the lower relative contribution of the photosphere compared to the disk for hotter stars . in this section , we analyze the subsample of sources with x - ray counterparts . since the subsample is not selected for its ir properties , it provides a clean sample to calculate the variability fraction . there are 31 sources with detected x - ray emission , of which 20 are variable in the ir . again , we find high variability fractions in class i ( 6/7 ) , f ( 3/4 ) and ii ( 11/15 ) , while none of the four class iii sources is variable . the sample size is small , but this is consistent with our analysis of the ir selected sample in section [ sect : evolutionarytrendsofthevariability ] . we searched for correlations between the parameters of the x - ray emission ( median energy , fitted temperature and absorbing column density ) and the amplitude of the mid - ir variability . no such correlation is apparent within each sed class . for a given absorbing column density , soft x - ray emission is more strongly absorbed than hard x - ray emission . thus , the observed x - ray spectrum from more embedded sources always appears harder . since class ii sources have more circumstellar matter than class iii sources , it is not surprising that they appear harder . @xcite already discuss this for the l1688 x - ray data ; figure [ fig : probvarsed ] and [ fig : meanampsed ] show that class ii sources are more variable than class iii sources . we see no additional effect of the x - ray emission on the variability characteristics in the mid - ir . we present _ spitzer _ observations of ysos in the star forming region l1688 . observations were taken in four visibility windows in spring and fall of 2010 and 2011 , with about 70 observations in spring 2010 and about ten observations in the remaining visibility windows . the cadence of the observations is non - uniform to avoid bias in the period detection . our sample consists of 882 sources with lightcurves in irac1 and irac2 with at least 5 datapoints . of those 882 sources , we classify 70 sources as variable using the stetson test , the @xmath22 test and the lomb - scagle periodogram . the faintest sources in the sample have @xmath103 mag , but naturally the measurement uncertainties are larger for fainter sources . the algorithms detect variability if the amplitude is larger than @xmath104 mag for a source of @xmath105 mag . we define a sample of cluster members , including sources with an ir excess due to a circumstellar disk or with x - ray emission . for cluster members , there is a clear correlation between evolutionary status and ir variability . more embedded sources are more often detected to be variable , and they have on average larger variability amplitudes . overall , the data are consistent with the idea that all ysos are variable at @xmath5 m and @xmath6 m , and we thus propose that all variable sources in our sample are members of the l1688 star forming region . qualitatively different morphological types of lightcurves can be distinguished : 14 lightcurves are detected to be periodic ; beyond that , we find quasi - periodic lightcurves , where the variability has an apparent timescale , but is not regular enough to be detected as periodic ; aperiodic lightcurves without a preferred timescale ; and long - term variable lightcurves where variability is apparent , but no periodicity or time - scale can be determined within the observational window . in addition , there are lightcurves with short , non - repeating bursts or dips . roughly half of all sources become redder when they are fainter ; the other half becomes bluer . the reddening values of the first group are compatible with ism reddenig . the color changes in the second group require variability in the inner disk structure as proposed by @xcite or @xcite . this work is based on observations made with the spitzer space telescope , which is operated by the jet propulsion laboratory , california institute of technology under a contract with nasa . support for this work was provided by nasa through an award issued by jpl / caltech . this research made use of astropy , a community - developed core python package for astronomy @xcite . this research has made use of the simbad database and the vizier catalogue access tool , both operated at cds , strasbourg , france and of data products from the two micron all sky survey , which is a joint project of the university of massachusetts and the infrared processing and analysis center / california institute of technology , funded by the national aeronautics and space administration and the national science foundation . acknowledges spitzer grant 1490851 . h.y.a.m . and p.p . acknowledge support by the ipac visiting graduate fellowship program at caltech / ipac . p.p . also acknowledges the jpl research and technology development and exoplanet exploration programs . rag gratefully acknowledges funding support from nasa adap grants nnx11ad14 g and nnx13af08 g and caltech / jpl awards 1373081 , 1424329 , and 1440160 in support of spitzer space telescope observing programs . s.j.w . was supported by nasa contract nas8 - 03060 . _ facilities : _ : : we identify 2mass j16272802 - 2439335 with because they match within the positional accuracy and the observed flux densities fit nicely together in a sed . : : after a visual inspection of the 2mass images , which form the basis of @xcite , we also identify 2mass j16273288 - 2428116 with . : : based on the position and the expected shape of the sed for a yso , we also identify [ gpj2008 ] source 3 with . : : we propose that [ amd2002 ] j162724 - 242850 and are the same source , because their positions match and the fluxes form an sed that is fully consistent with a yso in l1688 . and : : [ sect : misidentified ] in comparison with @xcite , we find that is erroneously identified with source oph l1688 3 in simbad . the distance between the positions on the sky is 13 , much larger than the positional uncertainty . therefore , the name is not used in our source table . ylw 16 : : in one case , the simbad database does contain a reference to a multiple source ( ) , that is resolved in the ir . we associate our lightcurves with , which is the dominant component . : : the ukidss @xmath31-band image shows at least two sources within 1 of iso - oph 152 with partially overlapping point - spread functions ( sourceids 442426789990 and 442426789990 ) . the position of the second source is uncertain and fitted differently in the other bands ( where it is called source i d 442426789991 ) . all of this is not resolved in the irac data ; thus , in each band , we assign the brightest magnitude of either of those sources to iso - oph 152 . [ sect : g09notwil ] : : this source detected in several near - ir observations and is known to be variable in that wavelength range . this source is part of the triple system that is well resolved in sub - mm observations . based on its sed stretching out to 6 cm , this is a class i source , which matches the classification we derive from the ir data . most likely , this souce contributes to the seizable outflows observed from the triple system , which would further confirm its youth and thus its status as a cluster member @xcite . : : this source is detected at @xmath106 m , but not at @xmath107 m by @xcite but no further information is available in the literature . : : in @xcite , this objects is listed as a yso and potential member of l1688 based on the g09 sed classification and a match to a scuba source at @xmath108 m . however , the next peak of the scuba flux is 29 from the position of [ gmm2009 ] oph l1688 30 , just below the maximum distance for a match that is accepted in that work . : : this source is also listed as a yso with a scuba flux peak 20 away @xcite . : : we find that this source is mismatched in simbad ( see section [ sect : misidentified ] ) . there are several radio observations in molecular lines and in the continuum which indicate substantial circumstellar material and thus confirm the status as a yso , but if sstc2d j162621.7 - 242250 and [ gmm2009 ] oph l1688 3 are different sources either of them could be the source of the radio signatures . , a. , whitney , b. , wood , k. , plavchan , p. , terebey , s. , stauffer , j. r. , morales - calderon , m. , & ysovar . 2013 , in american astronomical society meeting abstracts , vol . 221 , american astronomical society meeting abstracts , # 256.10 Abstract:

Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.

Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered . Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video . Paper: the recent experimental developments in ultracold fermi gases and in particular the experimental realization of the bec - bcs crossover through feshbach resonance @xcite have arised in a field where theoretical investigations started a long time ago . indeed fairly soon after the publication of the bardeen - cooper - shrieffer ( bcs ) theory @xcite , the extension to the neutral fermi liquid @xmath4he was considered @xcite . although the case of liquid @xmath4he is more complex than the one of ultracold gases , it is nevertheless analogous to the situation found on the bcs side of the crossover , in the strong interaction regime . similarly the possibility of bose - einstein condensation ( bec ) of composite bosons was considered quite early for excitons in semiconductors @xcite , where the composite nature of these bosons is expected to be an essential physical feature . this is the situation met in the bec range of the bec - bcs crossover . deep theoretical investigation of this last situation was made not long afterwards by keldysh and kozlov @xcite , following a seminal work by popov @xcite which considered a physical model with short range potentials , much closer to the ultracold gas case . in both cases , due to the formal similarity between the bogoliubov and the bcs frameworks , the theoretical treatment relied on the fact that in the dilute limit the formalism leads directly to the schrdinger equation for the molecular state corresponding to the composite boson . this provided an anticipation of the study of the whole bec - bcs crossover . independently eagles @xcite , in the course of a study of superconductivity in doped semiconductors ( where the electron gas has a low concentration compared to standard metals ) , was led to investigate the extrapolation of the simple bcs formalism toward the dilute regime where pair formation would take place , due to the attractive interaction , and bose condensation of these pairs should occur at lower temperatures . in the context of cold gases , the physics of the crossover was considered by leggett @xcite , who stressed the physical interest of considering cooper pairs as giant molecules , emphasized the change of physical regime when the chemical potential goes through zero , and introduced the scattering length in the bcs formulation . the matter was taken up by nozires and schmitt - rink @xcite who studied the smooth evolution of the critical temperature in the crossover within the simplest @xmath5matrix approximation , showing in particular how the critical temperature of the ideal bose gas is recovered in the strong coupling limit . s de melo , randeria and engelbrecht @xcite addressed the crossover with the functional integral formalism . as it has often been stressed , the physical situation found in this bec - bcs crossover is extremely interesting since ( at least for wide feshbach resonances @xcite ) the scattering length @xmath6 of the different fermions with mass @xmath7 is enough to fully describe their interaction , while one has still to deal with the full complexity of a strongly interacting system . as a result the theoretical problem has not been solved exactly and one has to rely on various approximate schemes @xcite , the simplest one being the straight bcs formalism ( often called bcs - mf ) which is known to give a correct description at zero temperature in both the extreme bec and bcs limits @xmath8 . the imperfections of the approximate treatments are clearer in the bec regime . indeed if one wants to describe properly the departure from the ideal bose gas of dimers , one has to provide a correct description of the dimer - dimer interaction , in order to find the expected physics of a weakly interacting bose gas . as stressed by keldysh and kozlov @xcite the composite nature of the dimers has already to be properly taken into account at this stage in order to obtain correct results . a first step in this direction for the specific case of short range interactions , relevant for cold gases , was made by haussmann @xcite who obtained , both in the normal and in the superfluid state ( where this can be found naturally out of the bcs ansatz ) , that the dimer - dimer scattering length @xmath1 is related to the fermion scattering length @xmath6 by @xmath9 . this result was also obtained in ref.@xcite in the superfluid state by other methods . the level of approximation corresponding to this result turns out to be the born approximation for the dimer - dimer scattering . at the same level of approximation pieri and strinati @xcite derived quite recently the gross - pitaevskii equation from the bogoliubov - de gennes equations . however this level of approximation was markedly improved by pieri and strinati @xcite who performed the calculation at the level of a @xmath5matrix approximation and found @xmath10 . nevertheless their calculation does not include all the processes resulting from the existence of the fermions making up these composite bosons . the exact numerical result was obtained recently by petrov , salomon and shlyapnikov @xcite who basically solved the relevant schrdinger equation for the four - body problem and found for this dimer - dimer scattering length @xmath11 . thereafter it was shown @xcite how this same problem could be exactly formulated and solved within the methods of quantum field theory , with naturally exactly the same result . this last work is quite relevant to the present paper , and represents the basis out of which we will work . this is naturally linked to the fact that field theoretic methods are a convenient , and probably necessary , framework for an exact formulation and solution of this superfluid strong coupling problem raised by the bec - bcs crossover . in this paper , we provide an exact approach to the bec - bcs crossover problem from the bec side by presenting an exact fermionic theory of a bec superfluid of composite bosons in the low density range . the two interacting fermion species we deal with are actually the two lowest energy hyperfine states used experimentally @xcite in ultracold gases of @xmath12li or @xmath13k , and as it is usually done we will for convenience refer to them as `` spin up '' and `` spin down '' states . specifically working in the low density range means that we proceed basically to an expansion in powers of the gas density . otherwise our framework is completely general . in the present paper we deal with the lower orders in this expansion , but nothing in principle prevents our approach to be extended to higher orders , although admittedly this will require much more work . similarly we will restrict ourselves to the @xmath14 situation , which brings strong simplifications as we will see because in this case there are no fermions at all in the normal state . however it is quite possible to extend our approach to non zero temperature . finally we deal here with thermodynamics , but our framework allows us naturally to calculate dynamical quantities . as we mentionned our approach is in principle a low density expansion . however the density @xmath0 is not a convenient basic parameter since it rather appears in the formalism as the result of a calculation . on the other hand it is known ( and we will see it explicitely below ) that in the simple bcs approximation for the bec limit , which as mentionned above corresponds to a born approximation at the level of the mean field term , the density @xmath0 is proportional to @xmath15 , where @xmath16 is the gap parameter of the bcs theory . hence a convenient way to proceed effectively to a low density expansion is rather to expand in powers of @xmath16 . however this quantity is specific of the bcs approximation , which has no general validity . but it is directly related to the anomalous self - energy @xmath17 ( where @xmath18 is an energy - momentum four - vector ) which is a completely general microscopic quantity characteristic of a superfluid system . hence our method will specifically be an expansion of the general equations in powers of the anomalous self - energy @xmath17 . here we will calculate the equation of state , or more precisely the dependence of the chemical potential @xmath19 on the density @xmath0 ( a short account of our calculation has already been published @xcite ) . actually this is rather the reciprocal of this function which comes naturally out of the calculation , since @xmath19 enters the green s functions while @xmath0 is obtained at the end of the calculation , after elimination of @xmath17 which comes in the intermediate steps . the lowest order term in the expression of @xmath19 , beyond the trivial term of half the molecular binding energy @xmath20 , is the mean - field term . one has to note that , even at this stage , the composite nature of the bosons we deal with is entering as noted by keldysh and kozlov @xcite . however in our case it is lumped into the full dimer - dimer scattering length @xmath1 . this result is physically natural since , beyond the zeroth order term @xmath20 in the chemical potential @xcite corresponding to an isolated molecule , we expect in a density expansion to find the physics of two coexisting molecules , which should be fully describable by @xmath1 for its static properties , corresponding to the zero energy scattering properties . nevertheless , as far as we know , this quite reasonable result has always been in the literature more or less taken for granted or cursorily obtained , but not fully explicitely derived from a microscopic theory for composite bosons . hence our first step will be to obtain this fully explicit derivation . however we are naturally essentially interested by the next order term , at which we will also limit our present calculation . from the theory of weakly interacting elementary bosons this term is proportional to @xmath2 , as first obtained by lee and yang @xcite . we refer to this term as the lhy term . this term has then been rederived by beliaev @xcite making use of field theoretic methods . naturally it is reasonable to expect that a similar term arises for composite bosons . what is however less clear is that the coefficient is just the same as for elementary bosons , i.e. that it can be simply expressed in the same way in terms of @xmath1 . indeed it is clear that , at some stage in the expansion , the composite nature of the bosons will enter by other quantities than those describing the physics of elementary bosons . this is quite obvious physically since , by going to higher densities ( which corresponds to take into account higher order terms in the expansion ) , we will go toward unitarity and find physical properties linked to the existence of fermi seas . obviously this can not be obtained from the physics of elementary bosons . hence it is conceivable that additional processes contribute to the @xmath2 term for composite bosons . nevertheless we will find at the end of our paper that the @xmath2 term is indeed identical to the lhy term provided the dimer - dimer scattering length is used . the fact that this is not obvious is immediately realized from the number and the complexity of our steps , which do not map systematically on the elementary boson derivation . on the other hand this result makes sense physically when it is realized that the lhy term is directly linked to the existence of the gapless collective mode . a standard perturbation expansion should produce a @xmath3 term as the next term after the mean - field one . the existence of the lhy term is linked to the presence of these gapless elementary excitations which produce a singularity in the expansion , leading formally to a divergence in the coefficient of the @xmath3 term . obtaining the proper result is equivalent to the resummation of a partial series to all order in perturbations in order to get rid of the singularity . since these steps involve only low energies , they do not test the internal structure of the bosons which comes into play when energies of order of the binding energy @xmath21 are involved . in such a case it is reasonable that no difference appears between elementary and composite bosons . on the other hand the calculation of the coefficient of the regular @xmath3 term in the expansion involves the consideration of energies of order of the binding energy , as we will see explicitely , making explicit the composite nature of the bosons . this implies that at the level of this term one finds a result different from the case of elementary bosons . note that this result has been previously assumed to be correct in calculations of collective mode frequencies @xcite . on one hand this was in agreement with monte - carlo calculations @xcite , and on the other hand this has been supported by very recent experiments @xcite . at the level of handling the collective mode , very strong analogies with a purely bosonic approach , in particular with beliaev s work @xcite will appear for obvious physical reasons , although it can be seen that our treatment bypasses a good deal of beliaev s detailed diagrammatic analysis . we will not try to put these analogies away , but rather make use of these similarities and correspondances to make easier the physical and technical understanding of our calculation . however we will never make an actual use of a bosonic approach and all our theory is a purely fermionic theory , the essential physical feature being that we deal with fermion physics but with negative chemical potential @xmath22 . in particular we often use the word dimer to describe two fermions with spin up and spin down . but since the theory contains , in the corresponding propagator , not only the bound state of these fermions but also the scattering states , it should be taken as a simple convenient wording , although it is naturally physically suggestive . more generally and formally the anomalous self - energies @xmath23 and @xmath24 play clearly a role analogous to @xmath25 and @xmath26 for bosonic superfluidity . our paper is organized according to the above introduction . after introducing briefly the general formalism in the next section [ general ] , we proceed to the calculation of the normal and anomalous self - energies in section [ deltexp ] to lowest order in @xmath17 , which leads us to the mean field term in the expression of the chemical potential . then in section [ collmod ] we proceed to discuss the collective mode which plays an essential role in the calculation of the lhy term . then the calculation of the contribution of this collective mode to the normal and anomalous self - energies is performed in section [ sigcollmod ] , at the end of which the lhy contribution to the chemical potential is obtained . a number of technical details are treated in appendices , to try to make more palatable the main part of this paper which is already fairly heavy . our work deals only with the @xmath14 situation . hence it would be most natural to use the standard @xmath14 green s function formalism and naturally all the content of our paper can be reproduced with this formalism . however one has in this case to be careful in dealing with real frequencies , and specify precisely the location , with respect to the real axis , of singularities in the corresponding complex plane . this is often left implicit . a simple way to clarify this question is to deal with complex frequencies . but this is actually what one has to do naturally when one works at @xmath27 , where the frequencies run on the imaginary frequency axis . in the @xmath28 limit the discrete sums over matsubara frequencies turn into integrals over frequencies running on the imaginary axis ( the link with the @xmath14 formalism is merely obtained by continuing analytically the frequencies toward the real frequency axis , that is performing a so - called wick rotation on the frequency ) . this leads to somewhat clearer results . hence , despite its somewhat artificial character , we will work quite specifically with this @xmath14 limit of the @xmath27 formalism . actually this will not appear in many our expressions because of their formal nature and for this reason it does not make any real problem . the essential point is that , in this way , we will always have perfectly regular expressions , with an effective handling which is quite clear and easy . we deal only with the formalism of fermionic superfluidity , as it is known in superconductivity @xcite and superfluid @xmath4he @xcite . this entails the use of both the normal fermionic green s functions @xmath29 , where we make use of the four - vector notation @xmath30 , and their anomalous counterpart @xmath31 and @xmath32 , where we make use of standard notations @xcite . this could be written in a compact nambu formalism , but for clarity we prefer to write the normal and anomalous parts explicitely , with slightly different sign conventions . in practice we will always consider in the following , when we calculate @xmath33 , that we deal with @xmath34 , without writing it explicitely for simplicity . the existence ( i.e. the fact that they are non zero ) of these anomalous green s function is the basic ingredient of fermionic superfluidity in our formalism . this is quite clear physically since they are related to the condensate . , [ eqdysona]),width=377 ] we start by writing dyson s equations for this superfluid : @xmath35 their corresponding diagrammatic representation being given in fig . [ figdyson ] . here @xmath36^{-1}$ ] is the free atom green s function , with @xmath37 the atom kinetic energy @xmath38 measured from the chemical potential @xmath19 . the quantities @xmath39 and @xmath17 are respectively the normal and the anomalous self - energies . by definition @xmath39 is the sum of all diagrams , with one entering @xmath18 line and one outgoing @xmath18 line , which can not separated into two disconnected parts by cutting a single @xmath40 line ( or @xmath41 line ) . @xmath17 has the same definition except that it has two entering lines , one ( @xmath42 ) line and one ( @xmath43 ) line . we note that @xmath17 depends naturally in the general case on momentum and frequency . in the second equation , for @xmath32 which begins with an outgoing ( @xmath43 ) line and finishes with an outgoing ( @xmath42 ) line , it would look more symmetrical to introduce a corresponding anomalous self - energy @xmath44 , analogous to @xmath17 , but with two outgoing lines , one ( @xmath45 ) line and one ( @xmath46 ) line . however it can be related directly to @xmath47 by time reversal , as we have written explicitely . all formulae in the following turn out to be simpler to interpret when this substitution is done , and we will follow this standard habit . we note also that , since we deal with an equilibrium situation , where the gas is homogeneous , we do not need to introduce green s functions with different entering and outgoing momenta , as it would be required in the case of an inhomogeneous system . dyson s equations eq . ( [ eqdyson ] ) can be understood as a way of ordering the full perturbation expansion , by gathering terms into @xmath39 and @xmath17 . however it is interesting to note that this can be done in slightly different ways . for example we can gather in eq . ( [ eqdyson ] ) all the terms where only the free green s function @xmath40 and the normal self - energy @xmath39 appear , that is the terms where no anomalous terms are present . this leads to introduce @xmath48 , that is @xmath49 . in this way , by making use of @xmath50 instead of @xmath40 , we are only left to write in dyson s equations the anomalous terms , that is to rewrite these equations as : @xmath51 it is indeed checked easily that the algebraic solution of eq . ( [ eqdyson],[eqdysona ] ) , as well as the one of eq . ( [ eqdyson1 ] , [ eqdyson1a ] ) , is indeed : @xmath52 making use of the expression of @xmath53 this can be rewritten as : @xmath54\end{aligned}\ ] ] this result could have been obtained directly in the following way . in the definition we have taken above for the self - energy , we had excluded diagrams made of two blocks linked by a single propagator @xmath40 ( corresponding to an atom propagating to the right , as for the definition of the normal self - energy ) or @xmath41 ( corresponding to an atom propagating to the left , as it is produced by the anomalous self - energies ) . however we could take another definition where we would exclude only blocks linked by a rightward propagator , just as in the normal state . in this case the formal expression of @xmath33 in terms of the self - energy , i.e. @xmath55 , is just the same as in the normal state , as it is indeed the case in eq . ( [ eqdysonsol1 ] ) . but the expression of the self - energy has been naturally modified from @xmath39 to @xmath56 . indeed we have to include now terms containing leftward propagators @xmath41 . but it is easily realized that these new terms contain at most a product @xmath57 , corresponding to the presence of anomalous self - energies of opposite types at the extremities of the block . these two anomalous self - energies can be separated by any number of leftward propagators @xmath41 , with normal self - energies @xmath58 . the sum of all these produces a factor @xmath59 , which leads to the relation : @xmath60 in agreeement with eq . ( [ eqdysonsol1 ] ) . while they are completely general , the considerations presented in the preceding section are not of much practical use since we have no expressions for the normal and anomalous self - energies . in order to obtain explicit expressions , we will now begin to proceed along the lines outlined in the introduction , namely to perform a systematic expansion in powers of @xmath16 . in the present section , as an introduction and as a first step , we will only consider the lowest order in this expansion . the next order will then be addressed in the next section . in the first subsection we will consider the expansion of the normal self - energy , which turns out to be the easier one . then the anomalous self - energy will be handled along the same lines . as we have indicated in the introduction , and as we will check explicitely below , the expansion in powers of @xmath16 has the character of an expansion in powers of the density @xmath0 since we will find @xmath62 . hence the zeroth order in powers of @xmath16 corresponds to an infinitely dilute gas for which the normal self - energy is naturally zero . since by its definition this normal self - energy contains only processes which conserve globally the number of particles , the lowest order term @xmath63 in the normal self - energy must contain both @xmath16 and @xmath64 , because @xmath16 implies from its definition the annihilation of two atoms ( going physically in the condensate ) , while @xmath64 corresponds to the creation of two atoms ( coming out of the condensate ) . hence this lowest order term in the normal self - energy is the sum of all diagrams which contain @xmath65 and @xmath66 , and which have one entering line @xmath18 and one outgoing line @xmath18 , the rest of the diagrams containing only ( since we proceed to an expansion ) @xmath67 quantities , that is normal state quantities ( see fig . [ figt3 ] ) . we call the sum of all these normal state diagrams the normal part of @xmath63 . this is just @xmath63 , except for the @xmath65 and @xmath66 terms . , width=226 ] explicitely this means that this normal part of the diagrams contains only any number of bare propagators @xmath40 and of interactions lines . moreover the two atom lines coming out of @xmath66(with opposite spins ) are not allowed to interact immediately after entering the normal part of the diagram , since such an interaction is already included in @xmath66 ( as we will see explicitely below ) and allowing it would amount to double counting of diagrams . similarly the two atom lines entering @xmath65 are not allowed to interact immediately before . as it happens , such a normal state set of diagrams has already been essentially considered in ref.@xcite . indeed in this paper the scattering of a single atom by a dimer ( made of atoms with opposite spins ) has been calculated . the fact that a dimer is entering the diagram implied that the two corresponding atom lines can not interact immediately in the diagram , since such an interaction is already taken into account in the dimer propagator and this would be again double counting . there is a similar requirement for the two lines corresponding to the outgoing dimer . we see that the requirements on the normal part of @xmath63 are just the same as in the above paper . in this ref.@xcite the sum of all these diagrams was denoted @xmath68 where @xmath69 ( respectively @xmath70 ) is the four - vector of the entering ( respectively outgoing ) atom , and @xmath71 is the total four - vector of the single atom and the dimer . in our statement we apparently overlook the fact that @xmath68 contains only three atom lines , which go from the beginning to the end of the diagram , with various interactions between them in the diagram , since we deal with the vacuum scattering of an atom and a dimer . in contrast we could think that , in addition to these lines , the normal part of @xmath63 may contain any number of loops of atom lines . however it is clear physically that these loops are not allowed . indeed if we think of this normal part as representing , in a time representation , a succession of processes due to interaction , the appearance of a loop corresponds to the creation of a particle - hole pair . while such processes can always occur at non zero temperature , in our @xmath14 situation they are possible only if the chemical potential @xmath19 is positive , thereby allowing the existence of a fermi sea in which the hole can be created . but in our dilute regime we have @xmath72 and these processes are forbidden . this argument is developped more technically in appendix [ appnoloop ] . hence it is correct to identify the normal part of @xmath63 with @xmath73 since both contain only three atom lines , subject to the same restrictions indicated above . nevertheless there is still a small difference in the general case between the normal part we want and @xmath73 . in the definition of @xmath73 one has to sum over all possible four - vectors for the two lines making up the entering dimer , with the only restriction that their sum is fixed at @xmath74 . a similar summation applies for the two lines making up the outgoing dimer . on the other hand in our normal part the two lines ( p,@xmath75 ) and ( -p,@xmath76 ) entering in @xmath65 have a total zero four - vector , and because @xmath65 depends on @xmath77 , when we sum over @xmath77 , there is a weight @xmath65 which depends on @xmath77 , in contrast with the case of @xmath73 . nevertheless , as shown in appendix [ appt3 ] , it is possible to express in the general case our self - energy in terms of @xmath73 . but in our specific problem , this is an unnecessary complication since we will see that , at the order of the expansion we are considering , the dependence of @xmath65 on @xmath77 can be neglected , and @xmath65 can be considered as a constant which we denote merely as @xmath16 . hence we can factor @xmath61 out . similar considerations apply to @xmath78 and the entering dimer lines . there is still a very important point to consider before writing our expression for @xmath63 . among all the diagrams we have considered contributing to @xmath63 , there is necessarily a diagram which gives a contribution @xmath79 because it satisfies all our requirements . indeed this is just what is coming from the lowest order diagram in @xmath73 , which gives a contribution @xmath80 to @xmath73 and corresponds merely to the born approximation . this diagram is necessarily present because we considered it already in the preceding section [ general ] , when we were dealing with the general expansion of @xmath33 in powers of @xmath81 and @xmath17 . this is just the last term in eq.([eqdysonsol1 ] ) , when we replace @xmath59 by @xmath41 ( since we want only normal state diagrams ) and take @xmath17 independent of @xmath18 . however , since it is already explicitely present in eq.([eqdysonsol1 ] ) , this implies automatically that it is reducible ( and indeed it is obviously reducible ) and for this reason should not be included in @xmath63 ( otherwise we would double count this diagram ) . on the other hand this is clearly the only reducible contribution coming from @xmath73 , as seen directly from the diagrammatic expansion @xcite of @xmath73 , or because any such reducible contribution has to appear explicitely from eq.([eqdysonsol1 ] ) as explained above . accordingly we have to subtract this contribution out and we obtain finally : @xmath82 we can also rewrite this result in terms of our self - energy @xmath83 as : @xmath84 this result is also directly quite natural since , when we evaluate @xmath83 , the diagrams with @xmath41 are not considered as reducible , as we have seen , and accordingly @xmath79 should not be subtracted . we are now in position to calculate the single spin atomic density @xmath0 , which is given quite generally by : @xmath85 if @xmath86 is replaced by @xmath87 , one checks easily that @xmath88 , which is physically obvious since in this case we deal with a non interacting fermion gas , at @xmath14 , and chemical potential @xmath22 . there is no fermi sea ( which arises only for @xmath89 ) and there are no fermions . hence we can replace completely generally @xmath33 by @xmath90 in eq . ( [ eqdefn ] ) . since we work in this section at the lowest order in @xmath16 , which means at order @xmath91 in the present case , we can replace @xmath92 by @xmath93 , and @xmath33 by @xmath40 . this leads to : @xmath94 ^ 2 \label{eqdefn1}\end{aligned}\ ] ] where , as in eq . ( [ eqdefn ] ) , @xmath18 is for @xmath95 . at this stage it seems that , in order to calculate the density , we are required to have a deep knowledge of @xmath73 . this seems physically reasonable since , in eq . ( [ eqdefn1 ] ) , @xmath73 describes the scattering of an atom with the condensate which has clearly to be taken into account . however the actual situation turns out to be much simpler . in order to calculate the integral over @xmath96 in eq . ( [ eqdefn1 ] ) , it is convenient to close the contour in the upper complex half - plane @xmath97 ( which corresponds to @xmath98 ) , since the pole of @xmath99^{-1}$ ] is found for @xmath100 ( since @xmath101 ) . however it is shown in appendix [ appt3anal ] that , except for the born contribution , @xmath102 is analytical in the upper complex half - plane and does not contribute to the integral . the result comes entirely from the born contribution . this means that surprisingly the contribution of @xmath63 to @xmath0 is zero , and that the only non zero contribution comes from the explicit bcs term @xmath103 in eq . ( [ eqsigm ] ) . in other words the approximate bcs formalism gives the exact result at the lowest order in our @xmath16 expansion . it reads : @xmath104 ^ 2=\frac{m^2\,|\delta |^2}{8\pi ( 2m|\mu |)^{1/2}}\end{aligned}\ ] ] if we make use in this result of the zeroth order value of the fermion chemical potential @xmath105 , we end up with : @xmath106 actually this relation @xmath107 is precisely obtained from the dimer propagator @xmath108 ( see section [ collmod ] ) when it is evaluated near its pole and with the purely bosonic propagator factor merely replaced by @xmath0 . we proceed now in a somewhat similar way for the anomalous self - energy . the resulting equation is the generalization of the standard gap equation of the conventional bcs theory and it has the same character of being finally a self - consistent equation for @xmath17 . in writing an expression for @xmath17 , we can in full generality separate all contributing diagrams in two sets . in the first set , for both of the two entering fermionic lines , the first interaction is between these lines themselves . the second set corresponds to the opposite case , where for at least one of these two entering lines the first interaction is with a line which is not the other entering fermionic line ( see fig.[figxxa ] ) . this separation of the diagrams in two classes is completely analogous to the separation of the diagrams , coming in the standard self - energy @xcite , into an hartree - fock like set and another set involving the full vertex . the set of diagrams where the two fermionic lines interact can be immediately written in terms of @xmath31 , which is analogous ( and actually directly related ) to @xmath32 , except that it has , instead of outgoing lines , an ingoing ( @xmath46 ) line and an ingoing ( @xmath45 ) line . it satisfies a dyson s equation analogous to eq . ( [ eqdyson],[eqdysona ] ) , namely : @xmath109 introducing the fourier transform @xmath110 of the bare instantaneous interaction between @xmath75-atom and @xmath76-atom , this first contribution to the anomalous self - energy is : @xmath111 which has naturally just the form of the standard bcs term . let us now switch to the other set of diagrams , for which we proceed to an expansion similar to the one carried out in the preceding subsection . because of particle conservation this expansion involves now odd powers in @xmath112 ) . we consider first the term proportional to @xmath113 . the normal part of this diagram contains only one @xmath114 line and one @xmath76 line ( with any number of interactions ) , since additional lines are not allowed as discussed above . moreover , because the interaction is instantaneous , there is no possibility of crossing of interactions when the diagram is drawn in time representation . finally our lines are not allowed to go backward in time since this would correspond to the creation of a particle - hole pair , which is again not allowed in our case where we have a negative chemical potential at @xmath14 ( by contrast , for @xmath89 , such processes could naturally occur ) . in summary the only possible diagrams are those of repeated interactions between the @xmath114 and the @xmath115 atom . this corresponds merely to the propagation of a normal dimer . however these diagrams are already generated by the iteration of the term ( [ bcs ] ) when @xmath116 is written as @xmath117 from eq.([eqdysond ] ) at lowest order , and they should not be double - counted . hence there is no term of order @xmath16 in this set , and our expansion starts with terms containing @xmath118 . the analysis is now somewhat similar to the one made in the preceding subsection [ normself ] . to obtain the above third order term in the equation for @xmath17 , we have to write , together with the factor @xmath118 , all the normal state diagrams which have , in addition to the two entering lines ( @xmath46 ) and ( @xmath119 , another couple of entering lines coming from @xmath120 . moreover , we have two couples of outgoing lines , going into @xmath65 and @xmath121 . just as in the preceding subsection , we have a no first interaction restriction for all these couples of lines , including the ( @xmath46 ) and ( @xmath119 ones . as discussed above , in addition to these ingoing and outgoing ones with their continuations , no other lines can appear in these diagrams since they form loops , which are forbidden since we are at @xmath14 and @xmath22 . we find that such normal state diagrams have already been essentially encountered in ref.@xcite , where their sum has been called @xmath122 . here @xmath123 and @xmath124 are for the entering fermionic lines ( corresponding to @xmath18 and @xmath125 in our case ) , the total four - vector for the ingoing and outgoing lines being @xmath126 . finally there is , in the definition of @xmath127 , one entering @xmath128 dimer , while there are two outgoing dimers @xmath129 and @xmath130 . just as in the preceding section , we should take into account that , in the general case , we have the weight @xmath118 which depends on the four - vectors of the atom propagators making up the dimers , while in the definition of @xmath127 the summation over these variables is already performed , with only their sums @xmath128 , @xmath129 and @xmath130 being fixed . this problem could nevertheless be circumvented and an expression for the normal part obtained in terms of @xmath127 , in a way analogous to appendix [ appt3 ] . however , just as in subsection [ normself ] , this is not necessary . indeed from the lowest order term @xmath131 given by eq.([bcs ] ) , we see that @xmath17 does not depend at lowest order on the frequency variable @xmath132 . moreover , since we deal with a bare interaction potential @xmath133 which has a very short range , its fourier transform @xmath110 is a constant , except for very large wave vectors . but , as we will see , these wave vectors will not come into play because all the integrals we deal with converge at a much shorter wave vector . hence we find that , at lowest order , @xmath17 turns out to be independent of @xmath18 , just as in standard bcs theory . now , when we want to calculate the third order term , we may insert in it the expression of @xmath17 to lowest order , which is just a constant which we denote again as @xmath16 . accordingly the above problem disappears and the normal part of our diagrams can be expressed directly in terms of @xmath122 . nevertheless we have to take into account , just as in subsection [ normself ] , that some of the diagrams appearing in @xmath134 are actually not irreducible , and should not be included in our expression for @xmath17 . hence we have to subtract them out of @xmath135 . we denote @xmath136 what remains of @xmath127 after this subtraction . this will be taken care of just below . gathering our results , we end up with the following ( self - consistent ) equation : @xmath137 the factor 1/2 in front of @xmath136 is a general topological factor ( it is present even if we do not take @xmath16 as constant ) . indeed exchanging @xmath65 and @xmath121 corresponds to a mere change of variable and not to a different diagram . on the other hand , by making use of @xmath138 , any given such diagram would appear twice ( even if @xmath127 is actually unchanged when we exchange the bosonic variables of the two outgoing dimers , which amounts to change @xmath70 into @xmath139 ) . hence the factor 1/2 is required to avoid this double counting . we note that clearly @xmath17 depends indeed on @xmath18 in general , since this is already explicitely the case in eq.([eqdelta ] ) where the third order term depends on @xmath18 through @xmath140 . let us now be specific about the difference between @xmath127 and @xmath141 , due to the reducible diagrams contained in @xmath135 . one can obtain them by looking at the diagrammatic expansion @xcite of @xmath127 . however it is easier to notice , as indicated above , that they appear automatically explicitely from eq.([eqdysonc],[eqdysond ] ) , when their solution are expanded in order to obtain the complete perturbative series expansion of @xmath33 and @xmath31 in powers of @xmath142 and @xmath16 , because this expansion provides precisely all the reducible contributions in terms of the irreducible self - energies @xmath142 and @xmath16 . when we expand the solution for @xmath31 : @xmath143[g^{-1}_0(-p)-\sigma ( -p)]+\delta ( p ) \delta^ { * } ( p)}\end{aligned}\ ] ] to third order , we find : @xmath144g_0(-p)\end{aligned}\ ] ] where for consistency we have to take only the second order contribution @xmath63 ( given by eq.([eqsigmn2 ] ) ) to @xmath81 . the third order terms in the bracket are clearly the reducible contributions to @xmath145 , as it can be seen directly . they are displayed diagrammatically in fig.[figxxxx ] . in particular the last term of the bracket comes from the born term of @xmath146 . hence we have explicitely : @xmath147\end{aligned}\ ] ] . in the first two terms @xmath148 is obtained from @xmath73 by excluding the born term , since it is taken into account explicitely by the third term.,width=377 ] however it is now more convenient to work with @xmath127 rather than @xmath141 . hence we add to both members of eq.([eqdelta ] ) the reducible contributions . after multiplication by @xmath149 and taking into account eq.([eqf3 ] ) , we end up with : @xmath150 finally we obtain a closed equation by eliminating @xmath31 in favor of @xmath17 through eq.([eqdelta ] ) , or more simply through the definition eq.([bcs ] ) . multiplying eq.([eqf ] ) by @xmath151 and summing over @xmath18 we find : @xmath152 if we had only the first term in the right - hand side , we would merely have the linearized bcs gap equation . accordingly we proceed in the standard way @xcite to eliminate the bare potential in favor of the scattering amplitude . this is more easily understood by proceeding in a formal way . introducing the operator @xmath153 , with matrix elements @xmath154 , and the diagonal operator @xmath155 with matrix elements @xmath156 , the @xmath157-matrix for two fermions ( in the center of mass frame ) in vacuum satisfies @xmath158 , where the operator product implies naturally the summation on the intermediate variables with @xmath159 . this can just be written @xmath160 . if we note @xmath161 the second term in the right - hand side of eq.([eqf ] ) , we can rewrite eq.([eqgap1 ] ) as @xmath162 , or @xmath163 . inserting the above value of @xmath164 , this leads to @xmath165 , or @xmath166 . this is explicitely : @xmath167 where @xmath168 is the energy at which the @xmath157-matrix is calculated . in the present case , since @xmath169^{-1}$ ] , the total energy for the two fermions is @xmath170 ( @xmath19 for each fermion ) , as it can be seen directly by integrating the first term of eq.([eqgap1 ] ) over @xmath132 . in standard scattering theory the scattering amplitude @xmath171 at energy @xmath172 ( the reduced mass is @xmath173 ) is obtained from the evaluation of the @xmath157-matrix `` on the shell '' , i.e. taking @xmath174 with @xmath175 . in the present case we deal with a potential with a short range of order @xmath176 . this implies that @xmath177 and @xmath178 have to vary on a typical scale @xmath179 in order to have a significant variation of @xmath174 . since in the case of ultracold atoms we are dealing with much smaller wavevectors , and we may replace @xmath174 by @xmath180 . hence the scattering amplitude is merely given by @xmath181 . on the other hand , in this same regime , the scattering amplitude is given by its s - wave component @xmath182^{-1}$ ] . this gives @xmath183^{-1}$ ] . now we evaluate eq.([eqgap2 ] ) for @xmath184 small compared to @xmath179 . we see that in this range @xmath185 is essentially a constant , which we call simply @xmath186 . on the other hand @xmath161 is a rapidly decreasing function @xcite of @xmath187 , on a typical scale @xmath188 . hence we may replace in eq.([eqgap2 ] ) @xmath189 by @xmath190 , which can be expressed in terms of the scattering amplitude . this leads explicitely to : @xmath191\,\delta_1=\frac{1}{2 } \,\delta\ , |\delta |^2 \sum_{p}g_0(p)g_0(-p ) \phi ( p ,- p;0 , 0)\end{aligned}\ ] ] finally we take into account the fact that the sum over @xmath18 appearing in the right - hand side of eq.([eqgap3 ] ) is directly related to the dimer - dimer scattering amplitude @xmath192 in vacuum @xcite by : @xmath193 whereas : @xmath194 we note that , in eq.([eqt4 ] ) , we end up with @xmath192 being evaluated at a dimer energy @xmath195 , while the dimer - dimer scattering in eq.([eqam ] ) is related to @xmath192 evaluated at the binding energy @xmath196 . however at this stage the small difference between @xmath195 and @xmath197 is unimportant in @xmath192 , since it appears in the corrective term which is on the right - hand side of eq.([eqgap3 ] ) . in this term we may also , within the same level of accuracy , use @xmath198 . this leads finally to : @xmath199 when we substitute in this expression the relation @xmath200 found in section [ deltexp ] a , we obtain at the same level of accuracy : @xmath201 which is the standard mean field correction to the chemical potential , with the proper dimer - dimer scattering length @xmath1 . since the lhy terms come physically from the low energy collective mode , we need first to derive the expression for the collective mode propagator , as well as its anomalous counterpart . these propagators can be seen as the extension to the superfluid state of the dimer propagator in the normal state . for the normal component of this propagator , this is just the full vertex with two entering and two outgoing fermion lines , the two fermions having opposite spins . in the normal state , in the dilute limit , this vertex is just the single dimer propagator @xmath202 already used in ref.@xcite . it depends only on the total momentum @xmath203 and the total energy @xmath204 of the two fermions . in contrast with the above reference we work in the grand canonical ensemble and the energies are taken with respect to the chemical potential @xmath19 of single fermions . hence for all the energies @xmath205 used in ref.@xcite , we have to make the substitution @xmath206 . for the single dimer propagator we have to make @xmath207 . however we keep for simplicity the same notation as in ref.@xcite for the various quantities after having made this substitution . also for coherence , and in contrast with the preceding sections , we work in the present section with real frequencies , rather than with matsubara frequencies . this is also more natural physically since we are interested in particular in the ( real ) frequency of the collective mode . making use of the quadrivector notation @xmath208 we have thus , for this single dimer propagator in the dilute limit : @xmath209 where @xmath210 is the dimer binding energy , and we have made explicit the fact that @xmath211 . note that physically this propagator describes the bound state of the two fermions , through its pole at @xmath212 , as well as the continuum of scattering states where the dimer is broken , through the continuum in the spectral function starting at @xmath213 . in the superfluid we want to obtain the correction to this normal state result to lowest order in @xmath214 . more precisely we want to correct what corresponds to the self - energy if we had a single particle propagator . in the present case this is the irreducible vertex in the particle - particle channel , which by definition can not be separated in two disconnected parts by cutting two fermion propagators . more precisely , since the bare interaction between fermions is already taken into account in @xmath108 , this is the part of this irreducible vertex beyond the bare interaction we are interested in . this part @xmath215 of the irreducible vertex depends on the quadrivectors @xmath123 and @xmath124 of the entering particles , as well as on those @xmath216 and @xmath217 of the outgoing particles . assuming for the moment quite generally that the full vertex @xmath218 depends also on these four quadrivectors , we can write a bethe - salpeter equation , which is shown diagrammatically in fig . [ figgammaab]a : @xmath219 @xmath220 where @xmath221 . we have made explicit the fact that the normal state dimer propagator @xmath108 depends only on the sum @xmath222 of the incoming and outgoing fermions quadrivectors . in eq.([betsal ] ) the first sum is completely analogous to what should be written in the normal state . however we had also to write the second sum , which describes the anomalous processes where a dimer can be annihilated into the condensate or can be created from the condensate . this leads to introduce , in correspondance with the first sum , an anomalous irreducible vertex @xmath223 where four fermions are entering ( annihilated into the condensate ) and none is going out . correspondingly we need to introduce an anomalous full vertex @xmath224 with only outgoing fermion lines . naturally in order to close our set of equations we have to write for this vertex the corresponding bethe - salpeter equation , which is shown diagrammatically in fig . [ figgammaab]b , the major difference with the preceding one being that there is no normal state term : @xmath225 @xmath226 where we have introduced the irreducible vertex @xmath227 where there are only outgoing fermions , physically created from the condensate . now it is explicit in eq.([betsal ] ) that @xmath218 depends only on @xmath228 . by time reversal symmetry it depends also only on @xmath229 , this last equality resulting from momentum - energy conservation . hence , just as @xmath108 , it depends only on the total momentum and energy @xmath71 , and we merely denote this function as @xmath230 . similarly @xmath231 depends only on @xmath232 and we call it merely @xmath233 . in this way eq.([betsal ] ) becomes simply : @xmath234 and similarly : @xmath235 where we have introduced : @xmath236 these equations are naturally quite similar to the ones we had for the single fermion green s function . their solutions are : @xmath237 \left[t_2^{-1}(-p)-\gamma_{\mathrm irr}(-p)\right ] -\gamma^a_{\mathrm irr}(p){\bar \gamma}^a_{\mathrm irr}(-p)}\end{aligned}\ ] ] and @xmath238 \left[t_2^{-1}(-p)-\gamma_{\mathrm irr}(-p)\right ] -\gamma^a_{\mathrm irr}(p){\bar \gamma}^a_{\mathrm irr}(-p)}\end{aligned}\ ] ] as it could be expected physically , these equations are formally identical to those obtained for pure bosons @xcite . in the same spirit we note , for later use , that we could also introduce an anomalous full vertex @xmath239 with only ingoing fermion lines . it is easily shown , by writing the equivalent of eq.([betsalp ] ) with this vertex , to be related to the preceding ones by @xmath240 . this gives : @xmath241 \left[t_2^{-1}(-p)-\gamma_{\mathrm irr}(-p)\right ] -\gamma^a_{\mathrm irr}(p){\bar \gamma}^a_{\mathrm irr}(-p)}\end{aligned}\ ] ] we have now to find the expressions of @xmath242 , @xmath243 and @xmath227 within our expansion in powers of @xmath16 . since @xmath16 corresponds to diagrams with two ingoing fermions and @xmath64 to two outgoing fermions , particle conservation implies that the expansions start at second order with @xmath242 proportional to @xmath244 , @xmath243 proportional to @xmath91 and @xmath227 proportional to @xmath245 . since it can be seen that it is not required to go to higher order , the expressions of our irreducible vertices will be given by these second order expressions . since we have written explicitely the various factors @xmath16 and @xmath246 , the coefficients in the expressions of @xmath242,@xmath243 and @xmath227 correspond to diagrams containing only normal state propagators . for @xmath242 ( see fig . [ figxxabc]a ) , we have to write the expression for all the normal state diagrams with one ingoing dimer propagator and one outgoing dimer ( from the very definition of @xmath242 ) . moreover there are in addition two lines ingoing from @xmath64 and two lines outgoing to @xmath16 . these last two couples of lines have to be treated as dimer lines , which means that they are not allowed to interact immediately in the normal state diagrams we are drawing , because such interactions are already taken into account in @xmath16 and @xmath247 , and allowing them would amount to double counting . in summary we have to write all possible normal state diagrams with two ingoing dimer lines and two outgoing dimer lines ( these diagrams are automatically irreducible in the sense of the definition of @xmath242 , that is with respect to a single dimer propagator , since the four ingoing normal state lines can not disappear ) . this is depicted diagrammatically in fig . [ figxxabc]a . but this set of diagrams is just by definition the normal state dimer - dimer scattering vertex @xmath192 introduced in @xcite . more precisely , since the total momentum - energy linked to @xmath16 and @xmath247 is zero and the total momentum - energy of the ingoing lines is @xmath71 , this vertex is @xmath248 with the notations of ref.@xcite which gives for @xmath242 the explicit expression : @xmath249 with completely analogous arguments for @xmath243 , we obtain : @xmath250 and similarly : @xmath251 corresponding to the diagrams found in fig . [ figxxabc]b and fig . [ figxxabc]c . in eq.([gammirra ] ) and ( [ gammirrba ] ) we had to put a 1/2 topological factor corresponding to the fact that , for example , exchanging the two factors @xmath16 in eq.([gammirra ] ) ( that is precisely the set of diagrams they correspond to ) does not produce a different diagram , whereas this diagram would appear twice if we had just written @xmath252 . . a ) normal irreducible vertex @xmath253 . b ) and c ) anomalous irreducible vertices @xmath254 and @xmath255.,width=453 ] finally it is worth pointing out that @xmath192 satisfies @xmath256 . this is physically obvious since it corresponds to state that exchanging the arguments of the two ingoing dimer lines does not change the value of the vertex , since we exchange two bosons . but this property can also be proved directly from the integral equation @xcite satisfied by @xmath192 . similarly we have @xmath257 . let us consider now more specifically the collective mode dispersion relation . it is given by the pole of the collective mode propagator , that is : @xmath258 \left[t_2^{-1}(-p)-\gamma_{\mathrm irr}(-p)\right ] -\gamma^a_{\mathrm irr}(p){\bar \gamma}^a_{\mathrm irr}(-p)}=0\end{aligned}\ ] ] naturally we have first to check that for zero wave vector @xmath259 , the frequency @xmath260 is zero , that is @xmath261 is solution of this dispersion relation . for this case we have from eq . ( [ 2vertex ] ) for the bare dimer propagator : @xmath262 on the other hand we have @xmath263 where the last equality comes from ref.@xcite , and we have used the fact that , in @xmath264 , we may , at the order we are working , replace @xmath265 by its zeroth order value , namely @xmath266 ( we recall that we have to shift all the frequencies of ref.@xcite by @xmath195 ) . since we have already found that @xmath267 , we can easily check that eq.([moddisp ] ) is indeed satisfied in this case . now , as we will see , we are more specifically interested in the collective mode dispersion relation for wave vectors @xmath268 and frequencies @xmath269 . since @xmath270 and @xmath271 are of the same order of magnitude , we can expand the bare dimer propagator to first order as : @xmath272 on the other hand the typical scale of variation of @xmath192 on its arguments is @xmath188 for the wave vectors and @xmath270 for the energies , since we deal with a normal state quantity and there are accordingly no other scales in the corresponding problem . hence , for the wave vectors and frequencies we are considering , we can still take : @xmath273 on the other hand the above result at @xmath261 implies also that we have @xmath274 , and eq . ( [ moddisp ] ) for the collective mode frequency @xmath275 can be rewritten as : @xmath276 where we have set @xmath277 and in the last step we have used the lowest order expressions for @xmath278 and @xmath214 to calculate this quantity . naturally eq.([bog ] ) is just the bogoliubov dispersion relation , with the proper scattering dimer - dimer scattering length . as we have already indicated in the introduction , the lhy term arises from the collective mode contributions to the self - energies . if we were to continue naturally our above procedure and go to next order in @xmath16 , i.e. to order @xmath279 for example in the calculation of the normal self - energy , we would find singular results ( as it can be checked by proceeding to such a formal expansion in the explicit calculations performed below ) . this is due to the fact that the collective mode is gapless , and the lack of gap in the excitation spectrum leads to a singularity in the perturbative expansion . hence , instead of the next order terms , we include the whole contribution coming from the collective mode . avoiding in this way to proceed immediately to a @xmath16 expansion is equivalent to a series resummation , which allows to take care of singularities . writing the collective mode contributions to the self - energy is formally easy , when one notices for example the analogy of the normal part of the collective mode propagator with the product of @xmath64 and @xmath16 . indeed the term @xmath64 acts as a source of fermions in our diagrams , coming physically out of the condensate , while @xmath16 acts as a sink of fermions going into the condensate . these source and sink related to the condensate are required since , at @xmath280 , no fermions are present except coming from the superfluid . however when we allow to insert the normal part of a collective mode propagator , the starting part of the propagator acts as a sink for the rest of the diagram while the end part acts as a source . hence we have just to substitute @xmath244 by the normal part of a collective mode propagator . we will proceed in a similar way for the anomalous parts . naturally we will have to take care that the self - energy contributions already calculated above are not counted twice , by removing the corresponding terms . hence the collective mode contribution @xmath281 to the normal self - energy is obtained by replacing , in our lowest order expression , the product @xmath244 by the collective mode propagator , more specifically its diagonal component @xmath282 given by eq.([gamn ] ) , as depicted diagrammatically in fig.[figxab ] . we have naturally to sum over the variable @xmath71 of the collective mode . corresponding to eq.([eqsigmn2 ] ) , this leads to : @xmath283 . the diagonal component @xmath282 of the collective mode propagator is depicted by the heavy line , width=226 ] in principle this expression is improper because it contains , when we perform its expansion in powers of @xmath214 , contributions of zeroth and first order in @xmath214 which have already been taken explicitely into account in our above expansion . however in the present case these two contributions are zero . for the zeroth order term , this is fairly obvious physically since it corresponds to a normal state diagram with a normal state dimer propagator , and at @xmath14 no dimers are present which makes all diagrams of this kind equal to zero . mathematically this would happen because , in this diagram , the presence of a normal state dimer would necessarily imply , since there is no down - spin entering line , the presence of a down - spin loop ( if we calculate the up - spin self - energy ) which can not be present as explained in appendix [ appnoloop ] . in the collective mode contribution to the normal self - energy eq.([eqsigmod ] ) depicted in fig.[figxab],width=226 ] the conclusion is the same for the first order term , but the argument is slightly more complicated . the factor of @xmath214 in this term is @xmath284 ^ 2t_4(p/2,p/2;p/2)$ ] , which is a normal state diagram ( see fig.[figaaaa ] ) . it is actually a part of the diagrams belonging to @xmath102 since it has one entering fermion line and one entering dimer line , with the same for the outgoing lines . however we have seen , as it is detailed in appendix [ appt3anal ] , that only the born term in @xmath73 gives a non zero contribution to the particle number . on the other hand the term @xmath284 ^ 2t_4(p/2,p/2;p/2)$ ] does obviously not contain the born term of @xmath73 since this last one reduces to a simple propagator , whereas the presence of the factor @xmath108 implies at least two lines , with interaction between them . actually one can see more precisely that our term is equal to zero , since it contains necessarily propagators going backward in time ( see appendix [ appnoloop ] and [ appt3anal ] ) . taking the born contribution for @xmath73 and @xmath192 in @xmath284 ^ 2t_4(p/2,p/2;p/2)$ ] gives a good example of this . finally , after these considerations , we see that we can still use eq.([eqsigmod ] ) for @xmath285 . the conclusion will be different for the mode contribution to the anomalous self - energy discussed below . now when we look for the contribution @xmath286 to the density corresponding to eq.([eqsigmod ] ) , we have to replace @xmath33 in eq.([eqdefn ] ) by @xmath287 , just as it is done below eq.([eqdefn ] ) . quite similarly it will be enough to replace here @xmath33 by @xmath40 to obtain the lowest order contribution of the collective mode we are interested in . this gives : @xmath288 ^ 2= \sum_{p , p}\,t_3(p , p;p+p ) \,\gamma(p)\left[g_0(p)\right]^2\end{aligned}\ ] ] where again @xmath289 and @xmath290 . now the argument runs just as below eq.([eqdefn1 ] ) . we integrate first on the frequency variable @xmath96 of the quadrivector @xmath18 . as shown in appendix [ appt3anal ] , it turns out that , except for the born contribution , @xmath291 is analytical in the upper complex half - plane of the variable @xmath96 . since @xmath292 ^ 2=[i\nu -\xi_{\bf p } ] ^{-2}$ ] is also analytical in this half - plane , one obtains by closing the integration contour at infinity in this half - plane that only the born part @xmath293 of @xmath291 contributes to the result . hence for the integration over @xmath96 , we have just to calculate : @xmath294^{2}}\,\frac{1}{i\omega - i\nu- |\mu |-\epsilon _ { { \bf p}-{\bf p}}}= -\frac{1}{[i\omega -2|\mu |-\epsilon _ { \bf p}-\epsilon _ { { \bf p}-{\bf p } } ] ^{2}}\end{aligned}\ ] ] and we are left with : @xmath295^{2}}\end{aligned}\ ] ] the factor of @xmath282 is analytical in the upper complex half - plane of @xmath260 ( which corresponds to the negative frequency half - plane when we go back to the standard frequency language ) . hence by closing the @xmath204 contour in this half - plane , we are left to consider the singularities of @xmath282 . physically they correspond to the two - fermions excitations of the system , that is the collective mode and the broken molecule excited states . in the standard frequency language , the corresponding singularities are on the real frequency axis ( the imaginary axis for @xmath204 ) , on the negative as well as on the positive side . let us first consider the low frequency singularities . for a fixed value of @xmath296 , we have just as singularity a single pole corresponding to the collective mode frequency . let us call @xmath275 the positive solution of eq.([bog ] ) . our pole is located at @xmath297 . in eq.([gamn ] ) , which gives @xmath282 , for low frequency and wavevector , the denominator becomes @xmath298 , while from eq.([2vertex1 ] ) the numerator is @xmath299 $ ] . after going to imaginary frequency @xmath300 , this gives in @xmath282 , for the pole at @xmath301 , a residue : @xmath302\end{aligned}\ ] ] on the other hand , for small @xmath204 and @xmath296 , the @xmath187 integration in eq.([eqnmoda ] ) reduces to : @xmath303^{2}}=\frac{m^{3/2}}{8\pi \sqrt{2 |\mu |}}\end{aligned}\ ] ] this leads to : @xmath304\end{aligned}\ ] ] where in the last step we have made the change of variables @xmath305 . the numerical integral is @xmath306 and our final result is : @xmath307 where in the last equality we have made use of the lowest order result for @xmath214 , given by eq.([eqdefn3 ] ) . naturally , once we have taken care of @xmath73 , we are essentially back to the elementary boson theory @xcite and one recognizes in eq.([ncmfin ] ) the standard `` depletion of the condensate '' for the dilute bose gas , with @xmath308 being its coherence length . we have first considered the contribution of the low frequency singularities . we have now to finish up by showing that the higher frequency ones give a negligible contribution . first we see that , in eq.([eqnmoda ] ) , the denominator plays in this respect an unimportant role , since its modulus is larger than @xmath309 . hence to have an upper bound for the contributions we are investigating , we can replace this denominator by this lower bound , which gives after integration over @xmath187 an unimportant factor @xmath310 . hence we are again left with the evaluation of @xmath311 . it is now more convenient to go back to real frequencies ( equivalent to the change of variables @xmath312 ) . the integration is now over the imaginary @xmath313 axis and is closed in the negative @xmath313 half - plane . the contour can be deformed to merely enclose the negative @xmath313 axis , and corresponding to the singularities on this axis , @xmath314 has a jump across this axis . hence we have : @xmath315 now , from eq.([gamn ] ) , @xmath316 contains a first term @xmath317 which has all its singularities on the real positive @xmath313 axis , corresponding to the continuous spectrum of the broken dimer ( for @xmath108 ) and of the broken pair of dimers ( for @xmath318 ) . hence it is real on the negative @xmath313 axis and does not contribute to @xmath319 in eq.([eqcorr1 ] ) . from eq.([gamn ] ) the second term of @xmath320 is @xmath321 , which is directly proportional to @xmath322 from the product @xmath323 . accordingly we have proved basically our point since our result , being proportional to @xmath324 , is indeed negligible compared to the result eq.([ncmfin ] ) , which is proportional to @xmath2 . actually , to complete our proof , we have to be more careful and evaluate the coefficient of @xmath322 . this is quite obvious since eq.([ncmfin ] ) is in fact a contribution contained in eq.([eqcorr1 ] ) ( we have made no approximation to reach eq.([eqcorr1 ] ) ) . this detailed analysis is performed in appendix [ normselfa ] . we will now proceed in a similar way to obtain the mode contribution @xmath325 to the anomalous self - energy @xmath326 . this contribution is obtained by replacing , in the diagrams which lead to the second term of eq.([eqdelta ] ) , any second order product @xmath244 , @xmath327 or @xmath328 , by the corresponding collective mode propagator . accordingly we replace specifically @xmath244 by the diagonal component @xmath282 , and @xmath327 by the off - diagonal one @xmath329 . this is depicted diagrammatically in fig.[figxabcd ] . just as in eq.([eqdelta ] ) this last term comes with a topological factor @xmath330 to avoid double counting . on the other hand , since the two dimer outgoing lines in the first term play inequivalent roles , such a topological factor does not apply to this first term . it is worth noticing that , since the collective mode propagator depends only on the total momentum - energy four - vector , we do not meet at this stage the problems linked to the @xmath177-dependence of @xmath326 , discussed in appendix [ appt3 ] . . the diagonal component @xmath282 of the collective mode propagator is depicted by the heavy line with a single arrow and the off - diagonal one @xmath329 by the heavy line with two arrows . for the two diagrams the slash in the heavy lines means that the terms which are first order in @xmath214 have been removed.,width=377 ] just as in section [ anomself ] , we should not include the terms of @xmath122 leading to reducible contributions to the self - energy . these are easily obtained from the diagrams displayed in fig.[figxxxx ] by making the above substitution of @xmath244 by @xmath282 . this implies in the same way the replacement of @xmath122 by @xmath331 . however , as in section [ anomself ] , it is more convenient to add these reducible terms to both members of the equation for @xmath16 . in the left - hand side one obtains @xmath332^{-1}f(p)[g_0(-p)]^{-1}$ ] , while in the right - hand side one recovers @xmath127 instead of @xmath141 . finally we restrict ourselves to the contribution of the low frequency collective mode , the higher frequency contributions being expected to be of order @xmath333 and thus negligible , just as in the preceding section [ modnormal ] . accordingly the variable @xmath71 in @xmath282 and @xmath329 is small . this implies that @xmath334 , which comes as a factor of @xmath282 , can be replaced by @xmath335 at the order we are working . similarly @xmath336 , which comes as a factor of @xmath329 , can also be replaced by @xmath335 . after multiplication by @xmath149 this leads to the equation : @xmath337\end{aligned}\ ] ] which comes in place of eq.([eqf3 ] ) . in the preceding section [ modnormal ] we have already calculated @xmath338 at the level of eq.([eqintx ] ) and found @xmath339 , where @xmath340 is defined by eq.([ncmfin ] ) . in principle the calculation of @xmath341 follows the same line as the one of @xmath338 . one performs first the frequency integration by noticing that , for fixed @xmath296 , @xmath329 has a pole at @xmath297 . the corresponding residue @xmath342 is obtained from the residue @xmath343 for @xmath282 by comparing eq.([gama ] ) with eq.([gamn ] ) . one has to multiply @xmath343 by @xmath344 $ ] , evaluated at the pole , to obtain @xmath342 . this gives merely : @xmath345 now if we proceed as in eq.([eqintx ] ) we come to an integral with an ultraviolet divergence , which would invalidate our procedure . the reason for this problem is that we have not yet consistently removed in our calculation the terms of order zero and one in @xmath214 , as we have done precedingly . that we should do it was already appearent in eq.([eqfapp ] ) by the notation @xmath346 instead of @xmath347 ( which implies also a multiplication by @xmath348 ) . we recall that these terms have to be subtracted out because they have already been taken into account in our preceding lowest order calculation . however in the above preceding cases , it turned out that these terms were equal to zero , which made the subtraction transparent . here this is not the case . the most efficient way to perform this subtraction is to note that , from eq.([gamabar ] ) , @xmath329 contains already an explicit factor @xmath254 in the numerator , proportional to @xmath214 , which gives directly the factor @xmath349 in eq.([barza ] ) . hence the term of order @xmath214 to be subtracted is merely obtained by taking the other factors to order zero in @xmath214 , that is by replacing @xmath275 in eq.([barza ] ) by its zeroth order expression @xmath350 . actually this argument is a bit too fast . it misses the fact that we may at the same time evaluate @xmath351 in eq.([eqfapp ] ) with the chemical potential taken as @xmath352 , even for the @xmath353 term , as we had done in eq.([eqt4 ] ) . hence this whole step is taken up in more details in appendix [ muzero ] . we find in this way : @xmath354\end{aligned}\ ] ] making again the change of variables @xmath305 , this gives : @xmath355=\frac{32}{\pi } \mu _ b^{3/2}|\mu |^{1/2 } = \frac{24\pi \sqrt{2 |\mu |}}{m^{-3/2}}\,n_{cm}=3\sum_{p}{\gamma}(p)\end{aligned}\ ] ] hence the last bracket in eq.([eqfapp ] ) can be written @xmath356 . the rest of the argument proceeds just as in section [ anomself ] , provided @xmath353 is replaced by the above bracket . this leads to the replacement of eq.([mean ] ) by @xmath357\end{aligned}\ ] ] we may eliminate @xmath214 by making use of the number equation , which reads now from eq.([eqdefn2 ] ) : @xmath358 this gives : @xmath359=\pi a\ , a_m\left[n+4n_{cm}\right]\end{aligned}\ ] ] where in the last equality our replacement of @xmath360 by @xmath361 introduces only errors of order @xmath3 in the equation of state . to the same order this leads us to : @xmath362\end{aligned}\ ] ] in the last term we may replace @xmath286 by its expression eq.([ncmfin ] ) @xmath363 . this gives the familiar lee - huang - yang result for the chemical potential of a dimer , taking its binding energy as reference : @xmath364\end{aligned}\ ] ] in this paper we have presented a general theoretical framework to deal with fermionic superfluidity on the bec side of the bec - bcs crossover . our approach involves no approximation in principle , but in order to obtain explicit results we have to proceed to an expansion in powers ot the anomalous self - energy , which is basicallly equivalent to an expansion in powers of the gas parameter @xmath365 . we have applied our method to the @xmath14 thermodynamics and calculated the first terms in the expansion of the chemical potential in powers of the density . we have in this way shown explicitely that the mean - field contribution is indeed given by the standard expression in terms of the dimer - dimer scattering length @xmath1 . we have then proved that the lee - huang - yang contribution to the chemical potential retains also its standard expression from elementary boson superfluid theory provided @xmath1 is used in its expression . departures from elementary boson theory appear at the order @xmath3 . naturally our approach can be used to obtain other physical quantities and extended for example to finite temperature and dynamical properties . this will be considered elsewhere . `` laboratoire de physique statistique de lecole normale suprieure '' is `` associ au centre national de la recherche scientifique et aux universits pierre et marie curie - paris 6 et paris 7 '' . if we note @xmath367 the sum of all normal diagrams , with one single atom @xmath18 line going in and out , two entering atom lines @xmath368 ) and @xmath369 ) corresponding to an ingoing dimer , and two outgoing atom lines @xmath370 ) and @xmath371 ) corresponding to an outgoing dimer , we have : @xmath372 in order to obtain an expression for @xmath367 , one can find in the spirit of ref.@xcite integral equations for this quantity , and then identify in them a quantity which is precisely @xmath68 . another slightly more direct way is to separate , in @xmath373 , all the diagrams where 0 or 1 dimer lines are present , right at the beginning or right at the end of @xmath374 . we do not enter into the details but only give the result , on which the above mentionned separation is clear : @xmath375 ^ 2\,g(p')\,t_2(p - p')\,\delta_{p',p '' } \nonumber \\ + g(p')g(-p ' ) g(p'')g(-p'')t_2(p - p')t_2(p - p'')t_3(p',p'';p)\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath376 is the kronecker symbol , and @xmath377 is the normal state dimer propagator . one can check , by making use of eq . ( [ eq2appt3 ] ) and of the integral equation @xcite satisfied by @xmath73 , that eq . ( [ eq1appt3 ] ) reduces to eq . ( [ eqsigmn2 ] ) when @xmath17 does not depend on @xmath18 . since we are at @xmath14 with a negative chemical potential , there is no fermi sea and no possibility of fermionic holes . when we consider the propagation of a fermionic atom , it has to be created before being destroyed . this corresponds to the fact that the free fermion propagator is retarded . in ( imaginary ) time and wavevector representation we have for the free atom green s function : @xmath378 where @xmath379 is the heaviside function . we consider now the contribution coming from any loop in a diagram . for clarity we do not write the wave vectors , which do not play any role in the argument . the loop starts for example at a vertex with time @xmath380 , with successive interactions at times @xmath381 . this implies in the term corresponding to this diagram the presence of the product @xmath382 . in order to have each term being non zero in this product of retarded green s function , we need @xmath383 , which is impossible to satisfy . hence one of the green s function in this product will necessarily be zero , and the contribution of any diagram with a loop will also be zero . note that the argument applies also if there is a single green s function in the loop @xcite . if we were to carry out calculations in frequency , rather than time , representation the corresponding free atom green s function is analytical in the upper complex half - plane , and the above result would appear through integration over frequencies with contours closed in the upper complex half - plane . we have considered for consistency the imaginary time formalism . naturally exactly the same arguments apply if we consider the real time representation . we give first an explicit proof of the analytical property of @xmath73 indicated in the text . we start from the integral equation satisfied by @xmath73 with at first essentially the notations of ref.@xcite : @xmath385 we follow ref.@xcite and perform the frequency integration in the second term , making use of the fact that the only singularity in the lower half complex plane comes from @xmath386 and is located at @xmath387 . we write then explicitely the resulting equation for @xmath388 , @xmath389 , while @xmath390 is replaced by @xmath391 , keeping in mind that the frequencies @xmath69 and @xmath70 have to be shifted by @xmath19 ( and @xmath391 by @xmath392 ) and that we work now with imaginary frequencies . this gives : @xmath393 @xmath394 when we write this equation for @xmath395 , we see that the first term , which is the born contribution , has a pole in the upper complex half - plane , at @xmath396 . on the other hand , in the integral , the first factor does not depend on frequency @xmath313 . the singularities coming from the dimer term will be in the lower complex half - plane with @xmath397 ( since we will have @xmath398 ) . regarding the @xmath399 term , if we write eq . ( [ 3vertex1 ] ) for the variable @xmath400 evaluated on the shell , i.e. @xmath401 , we obtain an integral equation for @xmath399 . in this equation the born term does not depend on frequency . the first term in the integral has its poles satisfying @xmath402 and the dimer term has again its singularities in the lower complex half - plane . hence by a recursive argument ( or equivalently by iteration of the equation ) , we conclude that the singularities of @xmath403 are also in the lower complex half - plane . this shows that indeed , except for the born contribution , @xmath384 is analytical in the upper complex half - plane of the frequency variable @xmath313 . involved in the calculation of the particle number @xmath0 . we use the standard representation where the propagator starts at the destruction time and ends at the creation time . b ) born term in the diagrammatic expansion of the propagator represented in a ) . c ) example of a diagram which gives a zero contribution due to the presence of a loop.,width=566 ] naturally we do not expect such a result to come by chance and we discuss now its physical origin . it is more easily seen in real time , rather than frequency , representation . the particle number eq.([eqdefn ] ) is merely given by : @xmath404 with @xmath405 . the average corresponds to a full propagator @xmath406 in time representation , where the particle is created at time @xmath407 , later than the time @xmath408 at which it is destroyed . in standard @xcite diagrammatic representation ( see fig.[figappc ] a ) ) , with time going from left to right and the propagator starting at the destruction time and ending at the creation time @xcite , we have to draw diagrams where the @xmath114 particle propagator starts from @xmath409 and goes globally forward ( that is to the right in fig.[figappc ] ) in time , ending up at @xmath407 . however when we write the perturbation expansion of this propagator , we have to use free particle propagators @xmath87 which are retarded and go only forward in time ( i.e. the arrows go to the left in fig.[figappc ] when we use the standard green s function representation @xcite ) . hence the zeroth order in our perturbation expansion is obviously zero . when we go to second order , corresponding to eq.([eqdefn1 ] ) , we can use @xmath64 which creates , at some given time , a pair of particles @xmath410 ( this process is instantaneous in time because , at lowest order , @xmath16 does not depend on frequency ) . similarly @xmath16 annihilates a pair of particles . the simplest combination of these ingredients , giving a non zero result for @xmath0 , is shown in fig.[figappc ] b ) : @xmath64 is located at positive time , and @xmath16 at negative time , allowing to have @xmath87 s going only to the left . this is just the born term of @xmath73 . however one sees easily that it is not possible to draw any other second order diagrams having the same property shown in fig.[figappc ] b ) . they would necessarily imply @xmath87 s going at some stage backward in time ( i.e. with arrows pointing to the right in fig.[figappc ] ) , which is not allowed . indeed we have to dispose of the @xmath114 propagator starting at @xmath409 , and this can only be done by annihilating it with @xmath16 at some negative time . similarly the @xmath114 propagator ending up at @xmath407 has to come from @xmath64 , acting at some positive time . then we are left with a @xmath115 propagator which can only go from @xmath64 to @xmath61 . any interaction between the @xmath114 and @xmath115 propagators is forbidden since this would merely amount to double count processes which are already taken into account in @xmath64 and @xmath61 . in this way we end up with the conclusion that only the born term leads to a non zero contribution to @xmath0 . in calculating the coefficient of @xmath322 in eq.([eqcorr1 ] ) , it is clear that we can evaluate all the other factors to zeroth order in @xmath16 , since we have already an explicit factor @xmath322 . this implies in particular to make @xmath411 in these terms . this leaves us with : @xmath412 @xmath413 . naturally this result could have been obtained more directly , by a straight expansion of @xmath282 in powers of @xmath16 , instead of resumming a whole perturbation series , as we have done in section [ collmod ] , and then expanding the result . we may first apply this formula for the collective mode contribution . in the present case it comes from the factor @xmath414 , which has a pole for @xmath415 . this is indeed the frequency of the bogoliubov mode , once the frequency is high enough for the zeroth order approximation in @xmath16 to be valid . correspondingly we have @xmath416 . on the other hand , we have for this value of the frequency @xmath417^{-1}$ ] . this has to be inserted in eq.([eqgam ] ) and the integration over @xmath296 has still to be performed . however if we concentrate on the low @xmath296 range ( where @xmath418 ) , we obtain a divergent integral @xmath419 . this is due to the fact that , in this range , our zeroth order handling in @xmath420 is not careful enough . from eq.([bog ] ) , we see that the dispersion relation has to be modified for @xmath421 . if we evaluate the low frequency contribution by putting a lower cut - off @xmath422 in the integral , we obtain @xmath423 and the overall result is of order @xmath2 . this is just the contribution eq.([ncmfin ] ) , where we have obtained the precise coefficient by our careful handling of this low frequency domain . now , if we define the low momentum region as @xmath424 , where @xmath425 is large compared to @xmath422 , but small compared to @xmath188 , our above treatment of the low frequency region is fully valid in this domain . on the other hand the integral in eq.([eqintx ] ) has already converged at the upper bound @xmath426 , and we may replace it by @xmath427 , just as we have done in eq.([eqintx ] ) . hence the contribution from the domain @xmath424 is exactly given by eq.([ncmfin ] ) . on the other hand , there are no divergences in the domain @xmath428 and its contribution is of order @xmath322 , and accordingly negligible compared to eq.([ncmfin ] ) . to be complete we have also to verify that there are no other sources of divergence in eq.([eqgam ] ) , analogous to what we have found at low momentum . since there is no singularity arising at finite frequency or momentum , the only possibility comes from the large frequency @xmath429 , large momentum @xmath430 region . in order to evaluate the contribution in this domain , it is more convenient to go back to the imaginary axis contour by performing backward the first step of eq.([eqcorr1 ] ) and write this overall contribution as : @xmath431 the scattering amplitudes @xmath432 and @xmath433 , introduced by @xmath254 and @xmath434 , may be shown to be equal and are dominated as expected in this range by the born contribution . they are real on this imaginary frequency axis . the born term has been obtained explicitely in @xcite , and @xmath432 is proportional to @xmath435 for large @xmath436 and @xmath437 . from eq.([2vertex ] ) there is in the modulus of the integrand a factor @xmath438^{3/4}$ ] coming from @xmath439 . then the overall integral is easily seen to be convergent for large @xmath436 and @xmath437 , which completes our proof . since there is no zeroth order term in powers of @xmath420 in @xmath329 , we have only to remove the term proportional to @xmath214 to avoid double counting , and go in this way from @xmath329 to @xmath440 . the corresponding diagram in @xmath31 is shown in fig.[figdiagsub ] . this leads to : @xmath441 where @xmath254 is given by eq.([gammirra ] ) . let us first replace the dimer propagator @xmath108 , given by eq.([2vertex ] ) , by its value @xmath442 where @xmath443 is replaced by its zeroth order value @xmath352 . when we consider the contribution from the low frequency and momentum contribution , we may replace @xmath254 by @xmath444 , and the pole of @xmath445 at @xmath446 gives : @xmath447= \frac{4\pi \mu _ b\sqrt{e_b}}{m^{3/2 } } \frac{4m}{{\bf p}^2}\end{aligned}\ ] ] this is indeed the second term in the right - hand side of eq.([eqgamaslash ] ) since in this last equation , which turns out to be of order @xmath448 , we have to make consistently @xmath449 ( and similarly we have to take @xmath450 , with @xmath451 ) . we are now left with the evaluation of the difference between our original expression and the one we have just considered , namely : @xmath452\end{aligned}\ ] ] which gives at the level of eq.([eqgap3 ] ) , after insertion at the level of eq.([eqfapp ] ) and summation over @xmath18 and @xmath71 : @xmath453 t_4(p,0;0 ) \end{aligned}\ ] ] where we have used eq.([gammirra ] ) for @xmath254 and the relation ( see ref . @xcite ) between @xmath192 and @xmath127 , namely @xmath454 . we show now that this difference is just what is required to be allowed to replace @xmath455 in eq.([eqt4 ] ) by @xmath456 , which is directly related to the dimer - dimer scattering scattering length @xmath1 by eq.([eqam ] ) . indeed it has been shown in @xcite that scattering amplitude @xmath457 satisfies quite generally an integral equation analogous to the standard integral equation for elementary bosons , namely : @xmath458 where @xmath459 is the sum of all irreducible diagrams with respect to cutting two dimer propagators , which is itself obtained from an integral equation with explicit kernel @xcite . formally this equation can be rewritten in terms of operators as : @xmath460 where we have introduced the diagonal operator @xmath461 ( the factor @xmath330 is again topological ) . we consider now this equation for @xmath462 and @xmath259 . with respect to the energy variable corresponding to @xmath71 , we take the two values @xmath195 and @xmath463 ( we note the operators with this last value with a superscript @xmath464 ) . the crucial point is that the difference between @xmath465 and @xmath466 is of order @xmath467 , that is the expansion of @xmath465 in powers of @xmath467 is regular . such a difference is negligible at the order we are working at . the regularity of the expansion can be seen from the integral equation ( eq.(b2 ) of ref.@xcite ) satisfied by @xmath465 , which is completely analogous to the one satisfied by @xmath127 ( eq.(9 ) of ref.@xcite ) , except that the last term ( with two dimer propagators ) in the equation for @xmath127 is not present for @xmath465 . this integral equation can be transformed in the same way , leading to more explicit expressions ( see eq.(11 ) and eq.(13 ) of ref.@xcite ) . on these expressions one checks easily that , for @xmath19 in the vicinity of @xmath352 , the propagator @xmath202 is evaluated for values of its argument which are never in the vicinity of its pole . hence one can proceed to a regular expansion . by contrast one sees also on the equations for @xmath127 that , for the term containing two dimer propagators the argument does reach the pole value , which makes the expansion singular . this explains why we can not argue that the difference between @xmath468 and @xmath469 is of order @xmath467 and negligible . the equation for @xmath470 reads : @xmath471^{-1}=\left[t_4 ^ 0\right]^{-1}+d^0\end{aligned}\ ] ] writing the difference with eq.([eqform ] ) and taking into account @xmath472 , we have : @xmath473^{-1}-t_4^{-1}=d - d_0\end{aligned}\ ] ] which can be rewritten explicitely , after premultiplication by @xmath474 and postmultiplication by @xmath475 , as : @xmath476t_4(q,0;\{{\bf 0},-e_b\})\end{aligned}\ ] ] where in the last term we have been allowed to replace @xmath195 by @xmath270 at the order we are working . the same substitution is allowed in eq.([eqabc ] ) , which completes our proof . let us finally note that , with respect to this part , our procedure has obvious strong analogies with the work of beliaev @xcite . indeed , as soon as we have established the non trivial result that , at our level of approximation , the structure of @xmath465 can be omitted which makes it analogous to an effective interaction , our dimers behave as elementary bosons and we are basically back to the situation investigated by beliaev . for a very recent review , see s. giorgini , l. p. pitaevskii and s. stringari , arxiv:0706.3360 and to be published in rev . j. bardeen , l. n. cooper and j. r. schrieffer , phys . rev . * 108 * , 1175 ( 1957 ) . l. p. pitaevskii , zh . . phys . * 37 * , 1794 ( 1959 ) [ sov . jetp * 10 * , 1267 ( 1960 ) ] ; l. n. cooper , r. l. mills and a. m. sessler , phys . rev . * 114 * , 1377 ( 1959 ) . s. a. moskalenko , fiz . tverd . tela * 4 * , 276 ( 1962 ) [ sov . solid state * 4 * , 199 ( 1962 ) ] ; j. m. blatt , k. w. ber and w. brandt , phys . rev . * 126 * , 1692 ( 1962 ) . l. v. keldysh and a. n. kozlov , zh . . phys . * 54 * , 978 ( 1968 ) [ sov . jetp * 27 * , 521 ( 1968 ) ] v. n. popov , zh . 50 * , 1550 ( 1966 ) , [ sov . jetp * 23 * , 1034 ( 1966 ) ] . d. m. eagles , phys . rev . * 186 * , 456 ( 1969 ) ; d.m . eagles , r.j . tainsh , c. andrikidis , physica c * 157 * , 48 ( 1989 ) . a. j. leggett , j. phys . ( paris ) , colloq . * 41 * , c7 - 19 ( 1980 ) ; in _ modern trends in the theory of condensed matter _ , edited by a. pekalski and j. przystawa ( springer , berlin ) p. nozires and s. schmitt - rink , j. low temp . * 59 * , 195 ( 1985 ) . s ' a de melo , m. randeria and j.r . engelbrecht , phys . rev . lett . * 71 * , 3202 ( 1993 ) . r. combescot , phys . * 91 * , 120401 ( 2003 ) . r. haussmann , z. phys . b * 91 * , 291(1993 ) . p. pieri and g. c. strinati , phys . lett . * 91 * , 030401 ( 2003 ) . p. pieri and g. c. strinati , phys . rev b , * 61 * , 15370 ( 2000 ) . d. s. petrov , c. salomon , and g.v . shlyapnikov , phys . * 93 * , 090404 ( 2004 ) . brodsky , a.v . klaptsov , m.yu . kagan , r. combescot and x. leyronas , j.e.t.p . letters * 82 * , 273 ( 2005 ) and phys . a * 73 * , 032724 ( 2006 ) . x. leyronas and r. combescot , phys . lett . * 99 * , 170402 ( 2007 ) . we set @xmath477 throughout the paper . t. d. lee and c. n. yang , phys . rev . * 105 * , 1119 ( 1957 ) ; t. d. lee , k. huang and c. n. yang , phys . rev . * 106 * , 1135 ( 1957 ) . s. t. beliaev , sov . jetp * 7 * , 289 ( 1958 ) . s. stringari , europhys . lett . * 65 * , 749 ( 2004 ) . g. e. astrakharchik , r. combescot , x. leyronas and s. stringari , phys . 030404 ( 2005 ) . g. e. astrakharchik , j. boronat , j. casulleras , and s. giorgini , phys . . lett . * 93 * , 200404 ( 2004 ) . a. altmeyer , s. riedl , c. kohstall , m. j. wright , r. geursen , m. bartenstein , c. chin , j. hecker denschlag , and r. grimm , phys . lett . * 98 * , 040401 ( 2007 ) . for an introduction to many - body techniques and superconductivity , see for example a. a. abrikosov , l. p. gorkov and i. e. dzyaloshinski , _ methods of quantum field theory in statistical physics _ ( dover , new york , 1975 ) and a. l. fetter and j. d. walecka , _ quantum theory of many - particle systems _ ( mcgraw - hill , new york , 1971 ) . d. vollhardt and p. wlfle , _ the superfluid phases of helium 3 _ ( taylor and francis , 1990 ) and references therein . v. m. galitskii , sov . jetp * 7 * , 104(1958 ) . for an introduction and references , see l. pitaevskii and s. stringari , _ bose - einstein condensation _ ( oxford , 2003 ) . Abstract:

Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.

Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered . Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video . Paper: tremendous progress has been realized in the last decades concerning the theoretical foundation of quantum optics in dielectric media . while the historical approach proposed by jauch and watson @xcite was already based on the standard canonical quantization formalism for fields , it neglected dispersion and dissipation which are intrinsic properties of any causal dielectric media satisfying kramers krnig relations . since then several important studies were devoted to the extension of the method to inhomogeneous and artificially structured media which are central issues in modern micro and nano photonics @xcite . furthermore , theoretical approaches adapted to transparent but dispersive media with negligible losses have been also developed based on different techniques such as the slowly varying envelope approximation @xcite or the quasi modal expansion method which is valid near resonance for polaritons @xcite . more recently , losses were included in the theory by adding phenomenologically some optical dissipation channels in the light propagation path @xcite . such a method was successfully used for the modeling of casimir forces in dissipative media @xcite and surface plasmon polaritons @xcite . + moreover , the most fundamental progress was probably done when huttner and barnett , and others @xcite proposed a self - consistent canonical quantization procedure for an homogeneous and causal dielectric medium by coupling photonic degrees of freedom with mechanical oscillator variables acting as thermal baths . the method , based on the pioneer works by fano and hopfield @xcite ( see also ref . @xcite ) , was subsequently extended to several inhomogeneous systems including anisotropic and magnetic properties @xcite . in parallel to these theoretical works based on the standard canonical quantization method , a different and powerful axis of research appeared after the work by gruner and welsch @xcite ( see also ref.@xcite ) based on the quantum langevin noise approach used in cavity qed ( i.e. , quantum electrodynamics ) @xcite . the method is also known as the green tensor method @xcite since it relies on efficient green dyadic techniques used nowadays in nano - photonics and plasmonics @xcite . this ` langevin - noise ' approach , which actually extends earlier ` semi classical ' researches based on the fluctuation - dissipation theorem by lifshitz and many others in the context of casimir and optical forces @xcite , was successfully applied in the recent years to many issues concerning photonics @xcite and nano - plasmonics where dissipation can not be neglected @xcite . in this context the relationship between the huttner - barnett approach on the one side and the langevin noise method on the other side has attracted much attention in the last years , and several works attempted to demonstrate the validity of the langevin noise method from a rigorous hamiltonian perspective which is more in a agreement with the canonical huttner - barnett approach @xcite . + the aim of this work is to revisit these derivations of the equivalence between the langevin noise and hamitonian method and to show that some unphysical assumptions actually limit the domain of validity of the previous attempts . more precisely , as we will show in this work , the analysis and derivations always included some hypothesis concerning causality and boundary conditions which actually lead to circularity in the deductions and are not applicable to the most general inhomogeneous systems used in nano - optics . specifically , these derivations , like the fluctuation - dissipation reasoning in lifshitz and rytov works @xcite , give too much emphasis on the material origin of quantum fluctuations for explaining macroscopic quantum electrodynamics in continuous media . however , as it was already pointed out in the 1970 s @xcite , one must include with an equal footings both field and matter fluctuations in a self consistent qed hamiltonian in order to preserve rigorously unitarity and causality @xcite . while this does nt impact too much the homogeneous medium case considered by huttner and barnett @xcite it is crucial to analyze further the inhomogeneous medium problem in order to give a rigorous foundation to the gruner and welsch theory @xcite based on fluctuating currents . this is the central issue tackled in the present work . + the layout of this paper is as follows : in section ii we review the lagrangian method developed in our previous work @xcite based on an alternative dual formalism for describing the huttner - barnett model . in this section we summarize the essential elements of the general lagrangian and hamiltonian model necessary for the present study . in particular we present the fundamental issue about the correct definition of hamiltonian which will be discussed at length in this article . in section iii we provide a quantitative discussion of the huttner - barnett model for an homogeneous dielectric medium . we discuss a modal expansion into plane waves and separate explicitly the electromagnetic field into classical eigenmodes and noise related langevin s modes . we show that both contributions are necessary for preserving unitarity and time symmetry . we consider limit cases such as the ideal hopfield - fano polaritons @xcite without dissipation and the weakly dissipative polariton modes considered by milonni and others @xcite . we discuss the physical interpretation of the hamiltonian of the whole system and interpret the various contributions with respect to the langevin noise method and to the loss - less hopfield - fano limit . in section iv we generalize our analysis to the inhomogeneous medium case by using a green dyadic formalism in both the frequency and time domain . we demonstrate that in general it is necessary to keep both pure photonic and material fluctuations to preserve the unitarity and time symmetry of the quantum evolution . we conclude with a discussion about the physical meaning of the hamiltonian in presence of inhomogeneities and interpret the various terms associated with photonic and material modes . in ref . @xcite we developed a new lagrangian formalism adapted to qed in dielectric media without magnetic properties . here we will use this model to derive our approach but a standard treatment based on the minimal coupling scheme @xcite or the power - zienau @xcite transformation would lead to similar results . we start with the dual lagrangian density : @xmath0 where @xmath1 and @xmath2 are the magnetic and displacement fields respectively . in this formalism the usual magnetic potential @xmath3 , defined such as @xmath4 , is replaced by the dual electric potential @xmath5 ( in the ` coulomb ' gauge @xmath6 ) defined by @xmath7 implying @xmath8 the material part @xmath9 of the lagrangian density in eq . [ 1 ] reads @xmath10 with @xmath11 the material oscillator fields describing the huttner - barnett bath coupled to the electromagnetic field . the coupling depends on the polarization density which is defined by @xmath12 where the coupling function @xmath13 defines the conductivity of the medium at the harmonic pulsation @xmath14 . from eq . [ 1 ] and euler - lagrange equations we deduce the dynamical laws for the electromagnetic field @xmath15 with the electric field @xmath16 . similarly for the material oscillators we have : @xmath17we point out that the lagrangian density in eq . [ 1 ] includes a term @xmath18 which is necessary for the derivation of the dynamical laws for the material fields @xmath19 @xcite . furthermore , to complete the qed canonical quantization procedure of the material field we introduce the lowering @xmath20 and rising @xmath21 operators for the bosonic material field from the relation @xmath22 . as explained in ref . @xcite by using the equal time commutation relations between the canonical variables @xmath11 and @xmath23 , we deduce the fundamental rules @xmath24=\delta(\omega-\omega')\delta^3(\mathbf{x}-\mathbf{x'})\textbf{i}. \label{33}\end{aligned}\ ] ] ( with @xmath25 the unit dyad ) and @xmath26=[\mathbf{f}^\dagger_\omega(\mathbf{x},t),\mathbf{f}^\dagger_{\omega'}(\mathbf{x}',t)]=0 $ ] allowing a clear interpretation of @xmath20 and @xmath27 as lowering and rising operators for the bosonic states associated with the matter oscillators . + moreover , eqs . [ 5],[8 ] can be formally integrated leading to @xmath28 where @xmath29 is an initial time and where @xmath30 is a fluctuating dipole density distribution defined by : @xmath31 \nonumber\\ \label{35}\end{aligned}\ ] ] with @xmath32 and where by definition @xmath33 . we therefore have @xmath34 which is reminiscent of the general linear response theory used in thermodynamics @xcite . we point out that the term @xmath35 can be seen as an induced dipole density . however , as we will show in the next section the electric field itself is decomposed into a purely fluctuating term @xmath36 and a scattered field @xmath37 which depends on the density @xmath38 . therefore , the contribution @xmath35 to @xmath39 is also decomposed into a pure photon - fluctuation term @xmath40 and an induced term @xmath41 related to material fluctuations @xmath38 . + importantly , the linear susceptibility @xmath42 which is defined by @xmath43 characterizes completely the dispersive and dissipative dielectric medium . we can show that the permittivity @xmath44 is an analytical function in the upper part of the complex plane @xmath45 , i.e. , @xmath46 , provided @xmath42 is finite for any time @xmath47 . from this we deduce the symmetry @xmath48 and it is possible to derive the general kramers - krnig relations existing between the real part @xmath49\equiv\widetilde{\varepsilon}'(\mathbf{x},\omega)$ ] and the imaginary part @xmath50\equiv\widetilde{\varepsilon}''(\mathbf{x},\omega)$ ] of the dielectric permittivity . therefore , the huttner - barnett model characterized by the conductivity @xmath51 is fully causal and can be applied to describe any inhomogeneous dielectric media in the linear regime . + the central issue of the present paper concerns the definition of the hamiltonian @xmath52 in the huttner - barnett model . we remind that in ref . @xcite we derived the result : @xmath53 with @xmath54 where @xmath55:$ ] means , as usually , a normally - ordered product for removing the infinite zero - point energy . inserting the definition for @xmath20 obtained earlier we get for the material part @xmath56 which has the standard structure for oscillators ( i.e. , without the infinite zero - point energy ) . + however , hutner and barnett @xcite after diagonalizing their hamiltonian found that the total evolution is described in the homogeneous medium case by @xmath57 while as we will see this is actually a correct description ` for all practical purpose ' in a homogeneous dissipative medium for large class of physical boundary conditions , this is in general not acceptable in order to preserve time - symmetry and unitarity in the full hilbert space for interacting matter and light . the general method based on langevin forces and noises avoided quite generally mentioning that difficult point . we emphasize that while the conclusions presented in refs . @xcite is accepted by more or less all authors on the subject @xcite they have been some some few dissident views ( see refs . @xcite ) claiming , that in the context of an input - output formalism , the langevin noise formalism is not complete unless we consider as well fluctuations of the free photon modes ( see also the replies with an opposite perspective in refs . @xcite ) . in the present work we will generalize and give a rigrous qed like hamiltonian foundations to the prescriptions of refs . @xcite and we will show that it is actually necessary to include a full description of photonic and material quantum excitations in order to preserve unitarity . in order to appreciate this fact further we will first consider the problem associated with quantization of the electromagnetic field . we first introduce the paradigmatic homogeneous medium case considered initially by huttner and barnett @xcite , i.e. , with @xmath58 . we start with faraday s law : @xmath59 rewritten according to eq . [ 21 ] as : @xmath60 inserting eq . [ 4 ] and using the coulomb ( transverse ) gauge condition we get : @xmath61 we use the modal expansion method developed in ref . @xcite and write @xmath62 with @xmath63 a generic label for the wave vector @xmath64 , @xmath65 ( here we consider as it is usually done the periodical ` box ' born - von karman expansion in the rectangular box of volume @xmath66 ) , @xmath67 or 2 , labels the two transverse polarization states with unit vectors @xmath68 , and @xmath69 ( conventions and details are given in appendix a of ref . @xcite ) . inserting eq . [ 40 ] into eq . [ 91 ] we obtain the dynamical equation : @xmath70 with the time dependent source term @xmath71 to solve this equation we use the laplace transform of the fields which is defined below . + we are interested in the evolution for @xmath72 of a field @xmath73 which fourier transform is not necessary well mathematically defined since the field is not going to zero fast enough for @xmath74 ( e.g. , a fluctuating current or field ) . the method followed here is to consider the forward laplace transform of the different evolution equations ( such an approach was also used by suttorp by mixing both forward and backward laplace s transforms @xcite ) . to deal with this problem we first change the time @xmath75 variable in @xmath76 and define @xmath77 . we define the ( forward ) laplace transform of @xmath78 as : @xmath79 with @xmath80 ( @xmath14 a real number and @xmath81 ) . the presence of the term @xmath82 ensures the convergence . we will not here introduce the backward laplace transform @xmath83 since the time @xmath29 is arbitrary and can be sent into the remote past if needed . + as it is well known , the ( forward ) laplace transform is connected to the usual fourier transform since we have @xmath84 where @xmath85 is the fourier transform of @xmath86 with respect to @xmath75 . + now for the specific problem considered here we obtain the separation @xmath87 . the @xmath88 contribution corresponds to what classically we call a sum of eigenmodes supported by the medium ( i.e. with @xmath89 ) while the @xmath90 term is the fluctuating field generated by the langevin source @xmath91 . more explicitly , we have for the source term : @xmath92 where we use eq . [ 93 ] . the propagator function @xmath93 is expressed as a bromwich contour : @xmath94 where @xmath95 is defined as @xmath96 . we remind that a bromwich integral by definition will vanish for @xmath97 so that on the left side we actually mean @xmath98 . + the function @xmath93 has some remarkable properties which should be emphasized here . we first introduce the ` zeros ' of @xmath99 , i.e. , the set of roots @xmath100 solutions of @xmath101 . from the causal properties of @xmath102 we have @xmath103 and therefore we deduce @xmath104 implying that the ` + ' and ` - ' roots are not independent . the important fact is that the roots are located in the lower complex plane associated with a negative imaginary part of the frequency @xcite ( this is proven in appendix a ) . now , as shown in appendix b the integral in eq . [ 95 ] can be computed by contour integration in the complex plane after closing the contour with a semi - circle in the lower plane and using the cauchy residue theorem . we get : @xmath105 we also get @xmath106 for @xmath107 ( after integration in the upper plane and considering in detail the case @xmath108 ) . clearly , the function @xmath93 is here expanded into a sum of modes which define the polaritons of the problem ( this is shown explicitly in the next subsection ) . here , the normal mode frequency @xmath109 are complex numbers ensuring the damped nature of the waves in the future direction . we emphasize that in our knowledge this kind of formula has never been discussed before . the expansion in eq . [ 98 ] is however rigorous and generalizes the quasimodal approximations used in the weak dissipation regime and discussed in subsection iii(f ) . + similarly the source - free term @xmath110 reads : @xmath111 with the new propagator function @xmath112 like for @xmath113 we get @xmath114 for @xmath107 . additionally , the boundary condition at @xmath115 ( i.e. , @xmath116 ) imposes @xmath117 ( see appendix b ) . + the electromagnetic field can be calculated using the expansion eq . [ 94 ] or [ 100 ] . first , the mathematical and physical structure of the free - field is seen by using the modal expansion : @xmath118\boldsymbol{\hat{\epsilon}}_{\alpha , j}\phi_\alpha(\mathbf{x})\nonumber\\ = \sum_{\alpha , j , m}\frac{-\tilde{\varepsilon}(\omega_{\alpha , m}^{(-)})}{2i\omega_\alpha}\frac{e^{-i\omega_{\alpha , m}^{(-)}(t - t_0)}}{\frac{\partial(\omega\sqrt{\tilde{\varepsilon}(\omega)})}{\partial \omega}|_{\omega_{\alpha , m}^{(-)}}}[\dot{q}_{\alpha , j}(t_0)\nonumber\\-i\omega_{\alpha , m}^{(-)}q_{\alpha , j}(t_0)]\boldsymbol{\hat{\epsilon}}_{\alpha , j}\phi_\alpha(\mathbf{x } ) + hcc.\label{117}\end{aligned}\ ] ] where we used the symmetries of the modal expansion @xcite together with @xmath119 . from this we directly obtain : @xmath120\boldsymbol{\hat{k}}_{\alpha}\times\boldsymbol{\hat{\epsilon}}_{\alpha , j}\phi_\alpha(\mathbf{x})\nonumber\\ = \sum_{\alpha , j , m}\frac{-\tilde{\varepsilon}(\omega_{\alpha , m}^{(-)})}{2c}\frac{e^{-i\omega_{\alpha , m}^{(-)}(t - t_0)}}{\frac{\partial(\omega\sqrt{\tilde{\varepsilon}(\omega)})}{\partial \omega}|_{\omega_{\alpha , m}^{(-)}}}[\dot{q}_{\alpha , j}(t_0)\nonumber\\-i\omega_{\alpha , m}^{(-)}q_{\alpha , j}(t_0)]\boldsymbol{\hat{k}}_{\alpha}\times\boldsymbol{\hat{\epsilon}}_{\alpha , j}\phi_\alpha(\mathbf{x } ) + hcc . \label{118}\end{aligned}\ ] ] and similarly for the magnetic field : @xmath121\boldsymbol{\hat{\epsilon}}_{\alpha , j}\phi_\alpha(\mathbf{x})\nonumber\\ = \sum_{\alpha , j , m}\frac{\omega_{\alpha , m}^{(-)}\tilde{\varepsilon}(\omega_{\alpha , m}^{(-)})}{2c\omega_\alpha}\frac{e^{-i\omega_{\alpha , m}^{(-)}(t - t_0)}}{\frac{\partial(\omega\sqrt{\tilde{\varepsilon}(\omega)})}{\partial \omega}|_{\omega_{\alpha , m}^{(-)}}}[\dot{q}_{\alpha , j}(t_0)\nonumber\\-i\omega_{\alpha , m}^{(-)}q_{\alpha , j}(t_0)]\boldsymbol{\hat{\epsilon}}_{\alpha , j}\phi_\alpha(\mathbf{x } ) + hcc . \label{119}\end{aligned}\ ] ] the ( transverse ) electric field associated with this free solutions can also be obtained from the definition @xmath122 . we have thus @xmath123 and considering the laplace transform in eqs . [ 100 ] and [ 101 ] we can express the electric field as a function of @xmath93 , i.e. , @xmath124\boldsymbol{\hat{k}}_{\alpha}\times\boldsymbol{\hat{\epsilon}}_{\alpha , j}\phi_\alpha(\mathbf{x})\nonumber\\ = \sum_{\alpha , j , m}\frac{-1}{2c}\frac{e^{-i\omega_{\alpha , m}^{(-)}(t - t_0)}}{\frac{\partial(\omega\sqrt{\tilde{\varepsilon}(\omega)})}{\partial \omega}|_{\omega_{\alpha , m}^{(-)}}}[\dot{q}_{\alpha , j}(t_0)\nonumber\\-i\omega_{\alpha , m}^{(-)}q_{\alpha , j}(t_0)]\boldsymbol{\hat{k}}_{\alpha}\times\boldsymbol{\hat{\epsilon}}_{\alpha , j}\phi_\alpha(\mathbf{x } ) + hcc . \label{120}\end{aligned}\ ] ] from eqs . [ 119 ] and [ 120 ] we see that @xmath125 in agreement with maxwell s equation for a free - field ( the other maxwell s equations are also automatically fulfilled by definition ) . + importantly , in the vacuum case where @xmath126 we have @xmath127 and we find that the vacuum fields are given by @xmath128 with @xmath129 as expected . in the general case however causality imposes that the imaginary part of @xmath109 is negative . therefore the optical modes labeled by @xmath63 , @xmath130 and @xmath131 are damped in time ( the only exception being of course the vacuum case where the only contribution to the field arises from the source - free term @xmath88 since the @xmath90 terms vanishes together with @xmath38 ) . as a consequence , if @xmath132 the free terms vanish asymptotically . in particular , if @xmath133 ( corresponding to initial conditions fixed in the infinite remote past ) we can omit for all practical purposes the contribution of @xmath134 , @xmath135 , and @xmath136 to the field observed at any finite time @xmath75 ( unless we are in the vacuum ) . this is indeed what was implicitly done by huttner and barnet @xcite and gruner and welsch @xcite and that is why for all calculational needs they completely omitted the discussion of the @xmath134 , @xmath135 , and @xmath136 fields . however , for preserving the unitarity of the full evolution one must necessarily include both @xmath88 and @xmath90 terms . while this problem is apparently only technical we will see in the following its importance for inhomogeneous systems . + the previous discussion concerning the omission of the @xmath88 source free terms is very important since it explains the mechanism at work in the huttner barnet model @xcite . to clarify that point further we now express the scattered field @xmath90 using a green tensor formalism ( in appendix c we introduce alternative descriptions based on vectorial and scalar potentials ) . we first observe that from @xmath137 we obtain after integration by parts : @xmath138 with the dyadic propagator @xcite : @xmath139 the meaning of the tensor @xmath140 , which depends on @xmath141 , becomes more clear if we introduce the green tensor @xmath142 solution of @xmath143 we observe that if we separate the tensor into a transverse and longitudinal part we get @xmath144 with for the transverse dyadic green function @xmath145 and for the longitudinal part @xmath146 with the unit longitudinal dyadic distribution @xmath147 . we have also the important relations between the tensor @xmath140 and @xmath142 : @xmath148 now if we write @xmath149 and introduce the relation @xmath150 with @xmath151 the free mode given by eq . [ 120 ] and @xmath152 the source field , induced by @xmath153 , which is given by @xmath154 we get @xmath155 , i.e. , eq . [ rehh ] as it could be checked directly after comparing eq . [ s ] with eqs . [ gper ] and [ gpar ] . others important relations between the dyadic formalism and scalar green function are given in appendix d. + importantly , we can write all scattered field as a function of the rising and lowering operators @xmath156 , @xmath157 . in order to give explicit expressions we use the fourier transform notations ( i.e. , with @xmath80 with @xmath158 ) and the relation @xcite @xmath159\nonumber\\ \label{36}\end{aligned}\ ] ] we obtain : @xmath160 @xmath161where @xmath162 is a lowering operator associated with the transverse fluctuating field and defined as @xmath163 such that from eq . [ 33 ] we get the mode commutator @xmath164 and the harmonic time evolution @xmath165 if we impose the initial condition @xmath166 . + for the longitudinal electric field we deduce from eq . [ gpar ] and eq . [ cool2 ] @xmath167 ( in agreement with the definition @xmath168 ) and therefore : @xmath169 we have @xmath170 and the commutator @xmath171=\delta_{\alpha,\beta}\delta_{j , k}\delta(\omega-\omega')$ ] and the time evolution @xmath172 with similar initial condition as for the transverse field . regrouping these definition we have obviously @xmath173 furthermore , we can easily show that we have also @xmath174 leading to @xmath175 the description of the scattered field @xmath90 given here corresponds exactly to what huttner and barnett @xcite called the quantized field obtained after generalizing the diagonalization procedure of fano and hopfield@xcite . here we justify these modes by using the laplace transform method and by taking the limit @xmath176 explicitly . this means that we neglect the contribution of the @xmath88 transverse field which is infinitely damped at time @xmath75 . importantly @xmath30 does nt vanish since the time evolution of @xmath177 in eq . [ 35 ] is harmonic . it is important to further comment about causality and on the structure of the total field as a sum of @xmath88 and @xmath90 modes . the @xmath88 ( classical polariton ) modes are indeed exponentially damped in the future direction meaning that a privileged temporal direction apparently holds in this model . this would mean that we somehow break the time symmetry of the problem . however , since the evolution equations are fundamentally time symmetric this should clearly not be possible . similarly , propagators such as @xmath142 are also spatially damped at large distance , see eq . [ 103 ] , since we have terms like @xmath178 . this also seems to imply a privileged time direction and would lead to a kind of paradox . however , we should remind that only the sum @xmath88 + @xmath90 has a physical meaning and this sum must preserves time symmetry . indeed , we remind that time reversal applied to electrodynamics implies that if @xmath179 , @xmath180 , and @xmath181 is a solution of the coupled set of equations given in section ii then the time reversed solutions @xcite @xmath182 , @xmath183 , and @xmath184 is also defining a solution of the same equations ( we have also @xmath185 and @xmath186 ) . now , considering the dipole density evolution we get from eq . [ 18 ] after some manipulations : @xmath187 where @xmath188 is defined as @xmath38 ( see the definition eq . [ 35 ] ) but with @xmath189 replaced by @xmath190 . the presence of the time @xmath191 everywhere has a clear meaning . indeed , from special relativity choosing a time reference frame with @xmath192 ( passive time reversal transformation ) implies that the causal evolution of @xmath39 defined for @xmath72 will become an anticausal evolution defined for @xmath193 . going back to the active time reversal transformation eq . [ 18bis ] we see that the new linear susceptibility @xmath194 is given by @xmath195 ( @xmath196 is explicitly written in order to emphasize the anticausal structure . however , since we have @xmath197 and @xmath198 we have @xmath199 . this means that the new permittivity ( with poles in the upper half complex frequency space ) is now associated with growing anticausal modes since @xmath200 . the ( active ) time reversed evolution is defined for @xmath201 so that we indeed get modes decaying into the past direction while growing into the future direction . this becomes even more clear for the time reversal evolution of the electromagnetic field given by the separation in @xmath88 and @xmath90 modes . the time reversal applied on the @xmath88 field such as @xmath202 corresponding to classical polaritons is now involving frequency @xmath203 instead of @xmath109 . this leads to reversed temporal evolution such as @xmath204 and @xmath205 associated with growing waves in the future direction ( since the new poles are now in the upper half complex frequency space ) . more generally , we have shown ( see appendix c ) that the full evolution of either @xmath88 or @xmath90 fields is completely defined by the knowledge of the green function and propagators such as @xmath206 ( see eq . [ 106 ] ) with the causal function @xmath93 given by the bromwich fourier integral @xmath207 . now , like for the susceptibility @xmath208 time reversal leads to a new propagator @xmath209 and therefore by a reasoning equivalent to the previous one to @xmath210 involving the complex conjugate @xmath211 with a fourier expansion @xmath212 which again involves the anticausal permittivity @xmath213 . this naturally leads to growing waves in the future direction and to green function spatially growing as@xmath214 . the full equivalence between the two representation of the total field @xmath215 is completed if first we observe that the initial conditions at @xmath29 ( i.e. , @xmath216 , @xmath217 , etc ... ) are now replaced by final boundary condition at @xmath218 ( i.e. , @xmath219 , @xmath220 , etc ... ) . second , since the @xmath191 value is arbitrary we can send it into the remote future if we want and we will have thus a evolution expressed in term of growing modes for all times @xmath221 . the value of the field at such a boundary is of course arbitrary , so that if we want the two representation can describe the same field if for the final field at @xmath222 we take the field evolving from @xmath29 using the usual causal evolution from past to future . this equivalence is of course reminiscent from the dual representations obtained using either retarded or advanced waves @xcite . indeed , the total electric field @xmath223 can always be separated into @xmath224 or equivalently @xmath225 where @xmath226 and @xmath227 label the retarded and advanced source fields respectively and @xmath228 and @xmath229 label the homogeneous ` free ' fields coming from the past and from the future respectively . this implies that only a specific choice of boundary conditions in the past or future can lead to a completely causal evolution and therefore time symmetry in not broken in the evolution equations but only through a specification of the boundary conditions . in other worlds , in agreement with the famous loschmidt and poincar objections to boltzmann , strictly deriving time irreversibility from an intrinsically time reversible dynamics is obviously impossible without additional postulates . this point was fully recognized already by boltzmann long ago and was the basis for his statistical interpretation of the second law of thermodynamics @xcite . + in order to further understand the implication of the huttner - barnett model @xcite we should discuss how the full hamiltionan finally reads in this formalism . this is central since the langevin noise equations developed by gruner and welsch @xcite use only the @xmath230 hamitonian . in the huttner - barnett model the full dynamics is determined by the complete knowledge of the dipole density @xmath231 so that the results of gruner and welsch @xcite should be in principle justifiable . however , if we are not careful , this will ultimately break unitary and time - symmetry . in order to understand the physical mechanism at work one should first clarify the relation existing between the hutner - barnett model , using @xmath231 as a fundamental field , and the historical hopfield - fano approach @xcite for defining discrete polariton modes as normal coordinate solutions of the full hamiltonian . + we remind that the historical method for dealing with polariton is indeed based on the pioneer work by fano and hopfield @xcite for diagonalizing the full hamiltonian . the procedure is actually reminiscent of the classical problem of finding normal coordinates and normal ( real valued ) eigen frequencies associated with free vibrations of a system of linearly coupled harmonic oscillators . the classical diagonalization method @xcite relies on the resolution of secular equations already studied by laplace . actually , the first ` semiclassical ' treatment made by born and huang @xcite is mathematically correct and equivalent to the one made later by fano and hopfield even though the relation between those formalisms is somehow hidden behind the mathematical symbols . the full strategy for finding normal coordinates and frequencies becomes clear if we use fourier transforms of the various fields for the problem under study . indeed , a fourier expansion of a field component @xmath232 will obviously define the needed harmonic expansion . in the problems considered by born , huang , fano , and hopfield , the fourier spectrum @xmath233 is a sum of dirac distributions @xmath234 peaked on the real valued eigenvibrations @xmath235 . this specific situation needs a complete discussion since the hopfield - fano model @xcite leads to an exact diagonalization of the full hamiltonian @xmath52 . this will in turn makes clear some fundamental relations with the laplace transform formalism used in the previous subsections . + we start with the fourier transformed equations @xmath236 @xmath237 and @xmath238 with the constraint @xmath239 , @xmath240 coming from the real valued nature of the fields . from eq . [ b ] we get using the properties of distributions : @xmath241\sqrt{\frac{2\sigma_\omega}{\pi}}\widetilde{\textbf{e}}(\omega)+\widetilde{\textbf{x}_\omega}^{(sym)}(\omega)\label{d}\end{aligned}\ ] ] with @xmath242\nonumber\\ \label{e}\end{aligned}\ ] ] and where we used the reality constraint and introduced constants of motions @xmath243 , @xmath244 which will becomes annihilation and creation operators in the second quantized formalism . the principal value can be conveniently written @xmath245=\frac{1}{\omega^2-(\omega+i0^+)^2}-\frac{i\pi}{2\omega}[\delta(\omega-\omega)-\delta(\omega+\omega)]$ ] or equivalently @xmath245=\frac{1}{\omega^2-(\omega - i0^+)^2}+\frac{i\pi}{2\omega}[\delta(\omega-\omega)-\delta(\omega+\omega)]$ ] . this leads to two different representations of eq . [ d ] : @xmath246 where @xmath247 and @xmath248 can also be written like eq . [ e ] , i.e. , respectively as @xmath249 $ ] or @xmath250 $ ] . this discussion is reminiscent of the different representation given in section iii d involving retarded , advanced or time symmetric modes . of course the usual causal representation is @xmath251 which is obtained from the definition of @xmath252 given in section iii at the limit @xmath133 . however , all the descriptions are rigorously equivalent . it is also easy to show that we have @xmath253 which justifies why we called this field symmetrical . it corresponds to a representation of the problem mixing boundary conditions in the future and the past in a symmetrical way like it was used for instance by feynman and wheeler in their description of electrodynamics @xcite as discussed in section iii d. + now after inserting the causal representation of eq . [ f ] in eq . [ c ] and then into eq . [ a ] we get @xmath254 with @xmath255 and @xmath256 this causal permittivity @xmath257 being given by the huttner - barnett model @xcite the secular equations @xmath258 for transverse modes have no root in the upper complex frequency half - plane and in particular on the real frequency axis ( the longitudinal term is discussed below ) . this means that , unlike eq . [ d ] , eq . [ g ] has in general no dirac term corresponding to independent eigenmodes . the electric field is thus represented by a source term @xmath259 obtained like in the previous subsection using a causal green function . the absence of free normal modes for the electric field is of course reminiscent from the rapid decay of the free modes @xmath88 when @xmath133 as discussed before . the representation given here does nt distinguish between transverse and longitudinal fields but this should naturally occur since we have the constraint @xmath260 which implies @xmath261 . together with eq . [ a ] we thus get @xmath262 eq . [ long ] is actually reminiscent of the charge screening by @xmath257 . here we used the fact that @xmath257 has no root on the real axis otherwise the imaginary part of the permittivity should vanish and the the medium would be lossless at the frequency @xmath263 a fact which is prohibited by physical consideration about irreversibility @xcite . this reasoning is rigorously not valid at @xmath264 since the imaginary part of the permittivity is a odd function on the real axis . but then in general to have a root at @xmath264 it would require that the real part of the permittivity vanishes as well and this is not allowed from usual permittivity model ( see eq . [ b4 ] ) which makes therefore this possibility very improbable . + the previous reasoning is clearly formally equivalent to the ones obtained in the previous subsection and in both case the field @xmath265 or @xmath231 completely determine the electromagnetic evolution . still , there are exceptions for instance in the drude lorentz model with @xmath266 which forms the basis for the hopfield @xcite polariton model . this model is rigorously not completely lossless since we have @xmath267+\frac{i\pi\omega_p^2}{2\omega_0}(\delta(\omega-\omega_0)-\delta(\omega+\omega_0))$ ] corresponding to a singular absorption peak . + moreover , in this hopfield model @xcite , which is a limit case of the huttner barnett model @xcite , we get the exact evolution equation @xmath268 which in the case of the longitudinal modes leads to solving the secular equation @xmath269 . it has the solution @xmath270 where @xmath271 isthe longitudinal plasmon frequency . however relating this result to eq . [ long ] requires careful calculations since @xmath257 is here a highly singular distribution . indeed , applying eq . [ long ] will lead to find solutions of @xmath272 with @xmath273 with @xmath274 a longitudinal vector field . this singular @xmath251 field at @xmath275 seems to imply that polaritons are resonant at such frequency in contradiction with the result leading to @xmath276 for such polariton modes . now , due to the presence of absorption peaks at @xmath275 we have near this singular points @xmath277 where @xmath278 is supposed to be regular @xcite . moreover , outside this narrow absorption band the medium is effectively lossless and instead of eq . [ long ] we have @xmath279 which has the singular solution @xmath280 with @xmath281 a longitudinal vector field . importantly , from the hypothesis of regularity at @xmath282 we have @xmath283 and therefore @xmath284 which means that @xmath285 everywhere . the lorentz - drude model leads therefore to genuine longitudinal polaritons eigenfrequencies @xmath286 solutions of @xmath287 . we emphasize that the same result could be obtained using the laplace transform method . we have indeed @xmath288 with @xmath289 . therefore we can rewrite the longitudinal scattered field as @xmath290 . moreover since there is no longitudinal @xmath88 electric field and since @xmath291 we have @xmath292 which shows that the genuine longitudinal polariton oscillates at the frequency @xmath293 as expected . + the transverse polariton modes of the hopfield model are obtained in a similar way from eq . [ g ] with @xmath294 with @xmath295 a transverse vector field . as explained in the appendix g solving the problem with a plane wave expansion labeled by @xmath63 and @xmath130 leads again to a secular equation @xmath296 for the two transverse modes ( @xmath297 ) giving a quartic dispersion relation @xmath298 with two usual hopfield solutions @xmath299}}{\sqrt{2}}.\nonumber\\ \end{aligned}\ ] ] the two - modes field have now the structure @xmath300 with @xmath301 with @xmath302 an amplitude coefficient for the mode ( see appendix e and @xcite for a derivation ) . + one of the most important issue in the context of the hopfield model concerns the hamiltonian . indeed , in this model the full hamiltonian eq . [ 10 ] @xmath303 reads @xmath304.\label{polaritonhopfield}\end{aligned}\ ] ] if we isolate first the longitudinal term we get @xmath305\nonumber\\=\int d^3\mathbf{x}[\frac{(\partial_t\mathbf{p}_{||})^2+\omega_l^2\mathbf{p}_{||}^2}{2\omega_p^2}]=2\frac{\omega_l^2}{\omega_p^2}\int d^3\mathbf{x}\boldsymbol{\beta}^\ast\boldsymbol{\beta}\end{aligned}\ ] ] we can of course introduce a fourier transform of the dipole field as @xmath306 and new polariton fields amplitudes @xmath307 . we thus have @xmath308 . this expression of the hamiltonian is standard for normal coordinates expansion in linearly coupled harmonic oscillators . + furthermore , using commutators like eq . [ 33 ] one deduce @xmath309=i\hbar\delta^3(\mathbf{x}'-\mathbf{x})\textbf{i}$ ] and other similar ones . in the fourier space we thus obtain @xmath310=i\hbar\delta_{\alpha,\beta}$ ] which lead after straightforward transformation to the commutators @xmath311=\delta_{\alpha,\beta}$ ] , @xmath312=[f_{\alpha,||}^\dagger(t),f_{\beta,||}^\dagger(t)]=0.$ ] with @xmath313 ( the time dependence in the heisenberg picture means @xmath314 ) . this naturally leads to the hopfield - fano hamiltonian expansion for longitudinal polaritons : @xmath315 a similar analysis can be handled for the transverse polaritons modes but the calculation is a bit longer ( see appendix e ) . to summarize this calculation in few words : using a fourier expansion of the different primary transverse field operators in eq . [ polaritonhopfield ] we get after some manipulations the hopfield - fano expansion @xcite @xmath316 with the operator @xmath317 obeying the usual commutation rules for rising and lowering operators . again this result is expected in a modal expansion using normal coordinates and again the same result could be alternatively obtained using the laplace transform method . to summarize , the approach developed previously using the laplace transform formalism agrees with the normal coordinates methods based on the fourier expansion in the frequency domain . both approaches lead to the conclusion that for an homogeneous medium the various electromagnetic and material fields are completely determined by the knowledge of the matter oscillating dipole density @xmath318 ( fourier s method ) or @xmath231 ( laplace s method ) . in the limit @xmath133 both approach are equivalent and there is no contribution of the free field in a homogenous dissipative medium ( the residual @xmath319,@xmath320 is exponentially damped in the regime @xmath133 ) . we also showed that if losses in the huttner barnett model are sharply confined in the frequency domain we can find exact polaritonic modes which agree with the historical method developed by fano and hopfield @xcite . these modes fully diagonalize the hamitonian @xmath52 . while we focused our study on the particular drude lorentz model the result is actually generalizable @xcite to homogenous media with conductivity @xmath321 which lead to a permittivity @xmath322+i\frac{\sigma(\omega)}{\omega}.\label{dangerous}\end{aligned}\ ] ] in particular the hamiltonian can in these special cases be written as a sum of harmonic oscillator terms corresponding to the different longitudinal and transversal polariton modes . we thus write @xmath323 and @xmath324 where @xmath131 and @xmath325 label the discrete longitudinal and transverse polaritons modes . however , for a more general huttner - barnett model where the permittivity is only constrained by kramers - kronig relations such a simple interpretation is not possible and the hamiltonian is not fully diagonalized . the additional physical requirement @xcite imposing that the imaginary part of the permittivity should be rigorously positive valued , i.e. , @xmath326 , also prohibits these exceptional cases which should therefore only appear as ideal limits with loss confined in infinitely narrow absorption bands . however as we will show in the next subsection the lossless idealization represents a good approximation for a quite general class of medium with weak dissipation . the previous results of hopfield and fano have still a physical meaning and are for example used with success for the description of planar cavity polaritons @xcite . + it is particularly relevant to consider what happens in the huttner barnett approach if we relax a bit the demanding constraints of the original hopfield - fano model based on eq . [ dangerous ] . for this we consider a medium with low loss such as the medium can be considered with a good approximation as transparent in a given spectral band where the field is supposed to be limited . this approach was introduced by milonni @xcite and is based on the hamiltonian obtained long ago by brillouin @xcite and later by landau and lifschitz @xcite for dispersive but slowly absorbing media . the main idea is to replace the electromagnetic energy density @xmath327 in the full hamiltonian by a term like @xmath328 where @xmath329 is the approximately real valued permittivity of the field at the central pulsation @xmath330 with which the wave - packet propagates . since this approach has been successfully applied to quantize polaritons @xcite or surface plasmons @xcite it is particularly interesting to justify it in the context of the more rigorous huttner - barnett approach developed here . in the mean time this will justify the use of hopfield - fano approach as an effective method applicable for the low loss regime which is a good assumption in most dielectric ( excluding metals supporting lossy plasmon modes ) . + from poynting s theorem , it is usual in macroscopic electromagnetism to isolate the work density @xmath331 such as the energy conservation reads @xmath332 by direct integration we thus get the usual formula for the time derivative of the total energy @xmath333 such as : @xmath334 which cancels if the fields decay sufficiently at spatial infinity ( assumption which will be done in the following ) as it can be proven after using the poynting vector divergence and stokes theorem . we now consider a temporal integration window @xmath335 to compute the average derivative @xmath336 where @xmath337 means the magnetic energy variation during the time @xmath335 and @xmath338=\int_{t}^{t+\delta t}dt'[ ... ]$ ] is an integration domain from an initial time @xmath75 to a final time @xmath339 . the next step is to fourier expand the field in the frequency domain and we write @xmath340 where the positive frequency part of the field is defined as @xmath341 ( the negative frequency part is then @xmath342^\dagger$ ] ) . we use similar notation for the displacement field and we introduce the fourier field @xmath343 . in order to achieve the integration eq . [ energybri ] the temporal window will be supposed sufficiently large compared to the typical period @xmath344 of the light pulse . this allows us to simplify the calculation and most contributions cancel out during the integration @xcite . additionally to perform the calculation we assume that we have @xmath345 . this is a usual formula in classical physics where the term @xmath346 is supposed equal to zero , but here we are dealing with a quantized theory and we can not omit this term . furthermore , we showed that in the huttner - barnett model when @xmath133 only the @xmath90 contributions discussed in section iii c remain @xcite . assuming therefore this regime the transverse field @xmath347 , and @xmath348 are fully expressed as a function of operators @xmath162 . [ rehhd ] and [ rehhe ] allow us to define the fourier fields : @xmath349 @xmath350 for @xmath351 ( for @xmath352 we have @xmath353 where @xmath354 is given by eq . [ glopglop ] at the positive frequency @xmath355 . similar symmetries and properties hold for the electric and magnetic fields ) . we thus see that the relation @xmath356 is approximately fulfilled if we consider only frequencies near a resonance at @xmath357 ( the spectral distribution in eq . [ glopglop ] is thus extremely peaked since losses are weak ) . this dispersion relation occurs for transverse polaritons modes @xmath358 ( neglecting the imaginary part ) and if the wave packet of spectral extension @xmath359 is centered on such a wavelength we can replace with a good approximation @xmath360 by @xmath361 in the numerator of eq . [ glopglop ] leading thus to @xmath356 . after this assumption the calculation can be done like in classical textbooks @xcite and eq . [ energybri ] becomes ( this usual calculation will not be repeated here ) : @xmath362)=0 , \nonumber\\ \label{energytri}\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath330 denotes now the transverse polariton frequency @xmath363 $ ] for the homogeneous medium considered here . in this formula the imaginary part of @xmath329 is systematically neglected in agreement with the reasoning discussed for instance in ref . alternatively eq . [ energytri ] could be rewritten using the time average @xmath364 in order to get the classical brillouin formula for the electric energy density in the medium but this will not be useful here . moreover , we introduce the mode operators : @xmath365 where @xmath366 is a frequency window centered on the polariton pulsation @xmath363:=\omega'_{\alpha , m}$ ] . now , if we suppose that the electromagnetic field is given by a sum of such transverse modes ( without overlap of the frequency domains @xmath366 ) then eq . [ energytri ] reads : @xmath367e_{\alpha , j , m}^{(-)}e_{\alpha , j , m}^{(+)})=0 , \label{energyquadri}\end{aligned}\ ] ] where the contribution @xmath368 arises from a modal expansion of the magnetic field and from using the resonance condition in the numerator of eq . [ rehhb ] ( which involves @xmath369 ) . + what is also fundamental here is that we have the commutators ( the derivation in the complex plane in given in appendix f ) : @xmath370=\delta_{\alpha,\beta}\delta_{j , l}\delta_{m , n}\frac{\hbar\omega_{\alpha , m}}{2}\frac{d\omega_{\alpha , m}^2}{d\omega_\alpha^2}.\nonumber\\ \label{window}\end{aligned}\ ] ] and @xmath371=[e_{\alpha , j , m}^{(-)}(t),e_{\beta , l , n}^{(-)}(t)]=0 $ ] . these relation imply the existence of effective rising and lowering operators @xmath372 for polaritons defined by @xmath373 . + these relations were phenomenologically obtained by milonni @xcite after quantizing brillouin s energy formula . here we justify this result from the ground using the huttner - barnett formalism . importantly , after defining the optical index of the polariton mode @xmath374 we can rewrite @xmath375 as @xmath376 where @xmath377 is the group velocity of the mode defined by @xmath378 . this allows us to rewrite the operators as @xmath379 ( since @xmath380 ) and finally to have : @xmath381 the total energy is thus defined as @xmath382 which is a constant of motion defined up to an arbitrary additive constant . this formula involves only the transverse modes so that actually it gives the energy @xmath383 associated with the transverse polariton modes in weekly dissipative medium and represents a generalization of hopfield - fano results as an effective but approximative model . + few remarks are here necessary . first , the model proposed here relies on the assumption that the fields is a sum of wave packets spectrally non overlapping . this hypothesis which was also made by garrison and chio @xcite was then called the ` quasi multimonochromatic ' approximation . this assumption is certainly not necessary since milonni s model includes as a limit the rigorous hopfield- fano model @xcite which does nt rely on such an assumption . in order to justify further milonni s approach @xcite and relax the hypothesis made it is enough to observe first , that in eq . [ glopglop ] the approximation @xmath356 is quite robust even if the fields is spectrally very broad . indeed , since losses are here supposed to be very weak the resonance will practically cancel out if @xmath14 differs significantly of a values where the condition @xmath357 occurs . second , if we insert formally eqs . [ glopglop ] and eq . [ reglop ] with the previous assumption into eq . [ energytri ] then instead of the term @xmath384 in eq . [ energytri ] we get a term @xmath385 . this contribution is in general more complicated because @xmath386 depends on @xmath14 . however , using explicitly eqs . [ glopglop ] and eq . [ reglop ] and specially the fourier expansion in plane waves we see that for the specific fields considered here eq . [ energyquadri ] still holds . this means that we can again introduce polariton operators @xmath387 , and @xmath388 defined by eq . [ modepolar ] . as previously these operators depend on a frequency window @xmath366 and here these are introduced quite formally for taking into account the fact that the resonance @xmath389 is extremely peaked near the different polariton frequencies @xmath390 . a product like @xmath391 occurring in the integration will thus not contribute unless the frequency @xmath392 and @xmath14 are in a given window @xmath366 . [ energyquadri ] thus results as a very good practical approximation . + remarkably , as observed in eq . [ window ] ( and explained in appendix e ) the commutator does not depend explicitly on the size of these windows ( which are only supposed to be small compared to the separation between the different mode frequencies and large enough to include the resonance peaks as explained in appendix e ) . therefore , this allows us to renormalize these operators as before by introducing the same rising and lowering polariton operators @xmath393 such as eq . [ energy5 ] and @xmath394 hold identically . we thus have completed the justification of the milonni s approach for dielectric medium with weak absorption @xcite . + an other remark concerns the longitudinal electric field which was omitted here since it does not play an active role in pulse propagation through the medium . we have indeed @xmath395 so that the reasoning was only done on the transverse modes . however , this was not necessary and one could have kept the longitudinal electric field all along the reasoning . since the transverse part is a constant as we showed before , this should be the case for the longitudinal part as well since @xmath396 is also an integral of motion . now , a reasoning similar to the previous one for transverse waves will lead to the brillouin formula for the longitudinal electric energy : @xmath397 where the longitudinal polariton modes are defined by : @xmath398 in this formalism the longitudinal polariton frequencies @xmath399 are the solutions of @xmath400 ( where losses are again supposed to be weak ) . the commutator can be defined using a method equivalent to eq . [ window ] and we get : @xmath401=\delta_{\alpha,\beta}\delta_{m , n}\frac{\hbar}{|m_{\alpha , m}|}. \label{windowlong}\end{aligned}\ ] ] with @xmath402 . after defining the lowering polariton operator as @xmath403 we thus obtain : @xmath404 as it should be . s approach @xcite leads therefore to an effective justification of longitudinal polaritons as well and this includes the hopfield - fano @xcite model as a limiting case when losses are vanishing outside infinitely narrow absorption bands . + a final important remark should be done since it concerns the general significance of the scattered field ( s ) in the lossless limit . indeed , we see from eq . [ modepolar ] that the transverse mode operators @xmath405 and @xmath405 rigorously vanish in the limit @xmath406 ( this is not true for longitudinal operators . [ modepolarlong ] which are physically linked to bound and coulombian fields ) . in agreement with the sub - section iii c we thus conclude that in the vacuum limit one should consider the @xmath88 fields as the only surviving contribution . however , we also see that for all practical needs if the losses are weak but not equal to zero then by imposing @xmath407 the @xmath88 terms should cancel and only will survive a scattered term which will formally looks as a free photon in a bulk medium with optical index @xmath408 . therefore , we justify the formal canonical quantization procedure used by milonni and others @xcite which reduces to the historical quantization methods in the ( quasi- ) non dispersive limit @xcite . however , this can only be considered as an approximation and therefore the original claim presented in ref . @xcite that the scattered field @xmath90 is sufficient for justifying the exact limit @xmath406 without the @xmath88 term was actually unfounded . as we will see this will become specially relevant when we will generalize the langevin noise approach to an inhomogeneous medium . the central issue in this work is to interpret the physical meaning of quantized polariton modes in the general huttner barnett framework of section ii and this will go far beyond the limiting hopfield - fano @xcite or milonni s approaches @xcite which are valid in restricted conditions when losses and/or dispersion are weak enough . for the present purpose we will focus on the homogeneous medium case ( the most general inhomogeneous medium case is analyzed in the next section ) . it is fundamental to compare the mode structure of eqs . [ rehhd ] , [ rehhe ] , [ rehhepar ] , and [ rehhb ] on the one side and the mode structure of eqs . [ 118 ] , [ 119 ] and [ 120 ] on the other side which are associated respectively with the free modes ` ( 0 ) ' and the scattered modes ` ( s ) ' . the ` ( 0 ) ' modes are the eigenstates of the classical propagation problem when we can cancel the fluctuating term @xmath38 . this is however not allowed in qed since we are now considering operators in the hilbert space and one can not omit these terms without breaking unitarity . inversely the scattered modes are the modes which were considered by huttner and barnett @xcite . moreover only these ` ( s ) ' modes survive here if the initial time @xmath29 is sent into the remote past , i.e. , if @xmath407 . for all operational needs it is therefore justified to omit altogether the ` ( 0 ) ' mode contribution in the homogeneous medium case . clearly , this was the choice made by gruner and welsch @xcite and later by more or less all authors working on the subject ( see however refs . @xcite ) which accepted this rule even for non - homogeneous media . if we accept this axiom then the hamiltonian of the problem seems to reduce to @xmath409 , i.e. in the homogeneous medium case , to @xmath410 which depends only on the fluctuating operators @xmath411 , @xmath412 in agreement with the langevin force / noise approach of gruner and welsch @xcite . + now , there is apparently a paradox : the complete hamiltonian of the system is in agreement with eq . [ 10 ] given by @xmath413 can we show that @xmath52 is actually equivalent to @xmath230 ? this is indeed the case for all practical purposes at least for the homogeneous medium case treated by huttner and barnett@xcite that we analyzed in details before . to see that remember that @xmath52 is actually a constant of motion therefore we should have @xmath414 . this equality reads also @xmath415 . now , the central point here is to use the boundary condition at time @xmath29 which imply @xmath416 . furthermore , since the time evolution of @xmath417 is harmonic we have @xmath418 . altogether these relations imply @xmath419 so that we have : @xmath420 in other words we get a description in which the fock number states associated with the fluctuating operators @xmath177 or equivalently @xmath162 , @xmath411 diagonalize not the full hamiltonian but only a part that we noted @xmath230 . however , this is not problematic since the remaining term @xmath421 is also clearly by definition a constant of motion since it only depends on fields at time @xmath29 . how can we interpret this constant of motion ? we can clearly rewrite it as @xmath422 . therefore , in the @xmath423 potential vector formalism defined in section ii , this constant depends on both @xmath424 and @xmath425 , i. e. , lowering and rising operators associated with the transverse @xmath426 and @xmath427 fields , and it also depends on the operators @xmath428 , @xmath429 which are associated with the fluctuating dipole distribution at the initial time @xmath29 . furthermore since we have also @xmath430 , @xmath431 , @xmath432 and since @xmath433 , @xmath434 we can alternatively write : @xmath435 this means that the remaining term @xmath436 depends on the knowledge of @xmath437 and @xmath438 electromagnetic free field . since in the limit @xmath133 these @xmath88 electromagnetic terms vanish at any finite time @xmath75 this would justify to consider @xmath436 as an inoperative constant . however , we have also the contribution of @xmath439 which play a fundamental role in the determination of @xmath440 , @xmath441 and @xmath442 at the finite time @xmath75 . therefore , while @xmath436 is a constant of motion it nevertheless contains quantities which will affect the evolution of the surviving @xmath90 fields at time @xmath75 . it is for this reason that we can say that for ` all practical purposes only ' @xmath436 is unnecessary and that @xmath230 is sufficient for describing the energy problem . + there are however many remarks to be done here concerning this analysis . first , while the hamiltonian @xmath230 gives a good view of the energy up to an additive inoperative constant it is the full hamiltonian which is necessary for deriving the equations of motions from hamilton s equations or equivalently from heisenberg s evolution like @xmath443 $ ] . it is also only with @xmath52 that time symmetry is fully preserved . in particular do not forget that in deriving the fano - hopfield @xcite formalism we introduced ( see eq . [ g ] ) the evolution @xmath444 which depends on the causal ` in ' field @xmath445 and on the causal permittivity @xmath257 . since the knowledge of @xmath446 is equivalent to @xmath91 in the limit @xmath447 the ( forward ) laplace transform method is leading to the same result that the usual fano method and this fits as well with the gruner and welsch langevin s equations @xcite . however , instead of eq . [ g ] we could equivalently use the anticausal equation @xmath448 where @xmath449 replaces @xmath449 and where the causal permittivity @xmath257 becomes now @xmath450 which is associated with amplification instead of the usual dissipation . the green integral equation now becomes @xmath451 where @xmath208 replaces @xmath452 ( see eq . [ 20bis ] ) and is associated with the anticausal dynamics which is connected to the time - reversed evolution . both formalism developed with either ` in ' or ` out ' fields are completely equivalent but this shows that we have the freedom to express the scattered field in term of @xmath453 , and @xmath454 or in term of @xmath455 , and @xmath456 . since there is in general no fully propagative ` free ' electromagnetic modes ( if we exclude the lossless medium limit considered by hopfield and fano @xcite ) then the surviving fields at finite time @xmath75 obtained either with @xmath133 or @xmath457 correspond to decaying or growing waves in agreement with the results discussed for the laplace transform methods . the full hamiltonian @xmath52 is thus expressed equivalently either as @xmath458 ( with @xmath459 the fluctuating field defined in section ii ) or as @xmath460 with @xmath461 the fluctuating field using using a final boundary condition at time @xmath222 . in the limits @xmath133 , @xmath457 this leads to @xmath462 or @xmath463 where the remaining terms ( see eq . [ rema ] ) @xmath464 and @xmath465 are two different integrals of motion . therefore , it shows that the representation chosen by gruner and welsch in ref . @xcite is not univocal and that one could reformulate all the theory in terms of @xmath449 instead of @xmath445 to respect time symmetry . furthermore , we emphasize that while the two hamiltonians @xmath466 and @xmath467 have formally the same mathematical structure they are not associated with the same physical electromagnetic fields since eq . [ glopiglopa ] and eq . [ outoftime ] corresponds respectively to decaying and growing radiated fields . causality therefore requires to make a choice between two different representations . it is only the choice on a boundary condition in the remote past or future together with thermodynamical considerations which allow us to favor the decaying regime given by eq . [ glopiglopa ] . + a different but related point to be discussed here concerns the hopfield - fano limit @xcite for which the general conductivity like @xmath468 leads to quasi - lossless permittivity ( see eq . [ dangerous ] ) . in this regime we found that an exact diagonalization procedure can be handled out leading to genuine transverse and longitudinal polaritons . these exceptions also fit with the time - symmetry considerations discussed previously since the quasi - absence of absorption makes the problem much more time symmetrical that in the cases where the only viable representations involve either @xmath449 or @xmath445 . of course the hopfield - fano model is an idealization which , in the context of the huttner - barnett framework , gets a clear physical interpretation only as an approximation for low - loss media , as explained in section iii g. + this leads us to a new problem , which is certainly the most important in the present work : considering the vacuum limit @xmath469 discussed after eq . [ 120 ] we saw that only the @xmath88 electromagnetic modes survive in this regime and that the @xmath90 modes are killed together with @xmath470 . these vacuum modes are completely decoupled from the undamped mechanical oscillators motion @xmath471 . in this limit time symmetry is of course respected and we see that the full set of eigenmodes diagonalizing the hamiltonian corresponds to the uncoupled free photons and free mechanical oscillator motions . an other way to see that is to use again the fourier formalism instead of the laplace transform method . from eq . [ g ] we see that in the vacuum limit it is not the scattered field defined by eq . [ glopiglopa ] which survives ( since @xmath470 ) but an additional term corresponding to free space photon modes . while this should be clear after our discussion this point has tremendous consequences if we want to generalize properly the huttner - barnett approach to an inhomogeneous medium . in such a medium the permittivity @xmath472 is position dependent . now , generally speaking in nanophotonics we consider problems where a dissipative object like a metal particle is confined in a finite region of space surrounded by vacuum . the susceptibility @xmath42 therefore vanishes outside the object and we expect electromagnetic vacuum modes associated with free space photon to play a important role in the final analysis . this should contrast with the huttner - barnett case for homogenous medium which supposes an unphysical infinite dissipative medium supporting bulk polaritons or plasmons . the inhomogeneous polariton case will be treated in the next section . in order to deal with the most general situation of polaritons in inhomogeneous media we need first to consider the formal separation between source fields and free - space photon mode . the separation used here is clearly different from the one developed in the previous section since we now consider on the one side as source term the total polarization @xmath473 ( see eq . [ 18 ] ) which includes both the fluctuating term @xmath30 but also the induced polarization @xmath35 and on the other side as source - free terms some general photon modes solutions of maxwell equations in vacuum . in order not to get confused with the previous notations we now label @xmath474 the vacuum modes and @xmath475 the modes induced by the total dipolar distribution @xmath473 . + we start with the second order dynamical equation @xmath476 which can be solved using the method developed for eq . [ 90 ] . indeed , by imposing @xmath477 in eq . [ 90 ] and by replacing @xmath38 by @xmath39 , @xmath134 by @xmath478 , @xmath479 by @xmath480 and so on in the calculations of section iii we can easily obtain the formalism needed . consider first the vacuum fields @xmath478 , @xmath481 and @xmath482 . from eqs . [ 118 ] , [ 119 ] in the limit @xmath126 we get a plane - wave modal expansion for the free photon field which we write in analogy with eq . [ 57b ] as @xmath483 with the modal expansion coefficients @xmath484 showing the harmonic structure of the fields . of course this transverse vacuum field satisfies maxwell s equations without source terms and in particular @xmath485 with @xmath486 . + we now study the scattered - fields @xmath487 , @xmath488 and @xmath489 . like for the calculations presented in section iii for the homogeneous medium case it appears convenient to use the green dyadic formalism which is well adapted for nanophotonics studies in particular for numerical computation of fields in complex dielectric environment where no obvious spatial symmetry are visible . starting with this formalism we get for the @xmath475 electric field : @xmath490 equivalently , by using the inverse laplace transform ( see appendix d for details ) @xmath491 , we obtain in the time domain @xmath492 this analysis implies @xmath493 and therefore we have @xmath494 . + moreover , most studies consider instead of the propagator @xmath495 the dyadic green function @xmath496 which is a solution of @xmath497 and which is actually connected to @xmath495 by @xmath498 . this dyadic green function is very convenient since practical calculations very often involve not the displacement field @xmath426 but the electric field @xmath499 . we obtain : @xmath500 alternatively in the time domain we have for the scattered field @xmath501 : @xmath502 this can rewritten by using the propagator @xmath503 together with eq . [ definiti ] as : @xmath504 finally , we can also use the dyadic formalism to represent the magnetic field @xmath505 . starting from eq . [ 6 ] which yields @xmath506 and therefore @xmath507 where we introduced the definition @xmath508 ( here we used the condition @xmath509 ) . in the time domain we thus directly obtain @xmath510 which yields @xmath511 as expected . + we emphasize here once again the fundamental role played by the boundary conditions at @xmath29 . what we showed is that at the initial time @xmath29 we have @xmath493 and thus @xmath512 which means , by definition of our vacuum modes , @xmath513 . in other words , the electric field associated with vacuum modes equals the total displacement fields at the initial time . this is interesting since it also implies @xmath514 ( which means @xmath515 ) . this can be written after separation into transverse and longitudinal parts as @xmath516 for the transverse ( solenoidal or divergence- free ) components and @xmath517 for the longitudinal ( irrotational or curl - free ) components . . [ gourbi ] is well known in qed since it rigorously agrees with the definition of the longitudinal field obtained in usual coulomb gauge using the @xmath3 potential instead of @xmath423 . untill now we did nt specify the form of the dipole density @xmath473 . the separation between source and free terms for the field was therefore analyzed from a microscopic perspective where the diffracted fields @xmath518 and @xmath505 was generated by the full microscopic current . in order to generalize the description given in section iii for the homogeneous medium we will now use the separation eq . [ 18 ] of @xmath473 into a fluctuating term @xmath30 and an induced contribution @xmath35 of essentially classical origin . using the laplace transform we get @xmath519 . now from the previous section we have therefore for the laplace transform of the electric field the following lippman - schwinger integral equation @xmath520.\nonumber\\ \label{149}\end{aligned}\ ] ] in order to get a meaningful separation of the total field we here define @xmath521 and @xmath522 we have clearly @xmath523 and @xmath524 this allows us to interpret @xmath142 as the green function of the inhomogeneous dielectric medium while @xmath525 is a free solution of maxwell s equation in the dielectric medium in absence of the fluctuating source @xmath153 . by direct replacement of eqs . [ 150 ] and [ 151 ] into [ 149 ] one get @xmath526 meaning that the total field can be seen as the sum of the free solution @xmath525 and of scattering contribution @xmath527 induced by the fluctuating source @xmath153 . + in the time domain we get for the electric field @xmath528 and for the magnetic field @xmath529 which are completed by the constitutive relation : @xmath530 . similarly we obtain for the new propagator : @xmath531\nonumber\\ -\int_{0}^{t}d\tau'\chi(\mathbf{x},\tau')\mathbf{u}_\chi(t-\tau',\mathbf{x},\mathbf{x''})\nonumber\\ \label{156}\end{aligned}\ ] ] we have the important properties @xmath532 , @xmath533 . the total electromagnetic field in the time domain is thus expressed as : @xmath534 @xmath535 with @xmath536 , @xmath537 finally , the constitutive relation for the scattered displacement field @xmath538 reads : @xmath539 . the boundary conditions at @xmath29 together with the field equations determine the full evolution and we have : @xmath540 we point out that the description of the longitudinal field should be treated independently in this formalism since at any time @xmath75 we have the constraint @xmath541 which shows that fluctuating current and field are not independent . more precisely , if we insert the constraint @xmath541 into the lagrangian formalism developed in section ii we get a new effective lagrangian density for the longitudinal field which reads : @xmath542 from eq . [ 2bb ] we get the euler - lagrange equation : @xmath543 with @xmath544 and which agrees with eq . [ 8 ] if the constraint @xmath541 is used . now , the formal solution of eq . [ 8b ] is obtained from eq . [ 17bb ] @xmath545 and allows for a separation between a fluctuating term @xmath546 and a source term @xmath547 . from this we naturally deduce @xmath548 integral eqs . [ 17bb ] or [ dde ] could in principle be solved iteratively in order to find expressions @xmath549 and @xmath550 which are linear functionals of @xmath551 and @xmath552 . alternatively , this can be done self - consistently using the laplace transform of eq . [ dde ] which reads @xmath553 and leads to : @xmath554 in the time domain we have thus @xmath555 with the effective susceptibility defined as@xmath556 we have equivalently for the effective susceptibility @xmath557 . after closing the contour in the complex plane we get @xmath558 where the sum is taken over the longitudinal modes solutions of @xmath559 ( with @xmath560 and @xmath561 by definition ) . the frequencies considered here are in general spatially dependent since the medium is inhomogeneous and are therefore very often difficult to find . in the limit of the homogeneous lossless medium we obtain the hopfield - fano @xcite model . + we emphasize that the present description of the polariton field contrast with the integral solution of eq . [ g ] @xmath444 which was obtained for the homogeneous medium : @xmath562 and which included only a scattering contribution @xmath90 due to the cancellation of the @xmath88 term for @xmath133 . here , we can not neglect or cancel the @xmath88 mode solutions since in general the medium is not necessary lossy at spatial infinity . this will be in particular the case for all scattering problems involving a localized system such as a metal or dielectric antenna supporting plasmon - polariton localized modes . however , mostly all studies , inspirited by the success of the huttner - barnett model @xcite for the homogeneous lossy medium , and following the langevin - noise method proposed gruner and welsch @xcite , neglected or often even completely omitted the contribution of the @xmath88 modes . still , these @xmath88 modes are crucial for preserving the unitarity of the full matter field dynamics and can not be rigorously omitted . only in those case where absorption is present at infinity we can omit the @xmath88 modes . + to clarify this point further consider a medium made of a spatially homogeneous background susceptibility @xmath563 and of a localized susceptibility @xmath564 such as @xmath565 at spatial infinity . the electromagnetic field propagating into the medium with total permittivity @xmath566 can be thus formally developed using the lippeman - schwinger equation as : @xmath567.\nonumber\\ = \overline{\mathbf{e}'}^{(1)}(\mathbf{x},p ) -\int d^3\mathbf{x ' } \frac{p^2}{c^2}\mathbf{g}_{\chi_1}(\mathbf{x},\mathbf{x'},ip)\nonumber\\ \cdot [ \bar{\chi_2}(\mathbf{x}',p)\overline{\mathbf{e}'}(\mathbf{x},p)+\overline{\mathbf{p}'}^{(0)}(\mathbf{x'},p)].\nonumber\\\label{154bb}\end{aligned}\ ] ] where we have defined a new background free field @xmath568 and a new green dyadic tensor for the background medium @xmath569 we have naturally @xmath570 and similarly @xmath571 . + importantly , in the time domain we can write : @xmath572\nonumber\\ -\mathbf{p}^{(0)}(\mathbf{x},t)+\int_{0}^{t}d\tau\chi_2(\mathbf{x},\tau)\textbf{e}(\mathbf{x},t-\tau).\nonumber\\ \label{15bbb}\end{aligned}\ ] ] we can check that we have @xmath573 . moreover , since from eq . [ 150b ] ( written in the time domain ) we have @xmath574 and since @xmath575 , we deduce that at the initial time @xmath29 @xmath576 as it should be to agree with the general formalism presented in section iv a. + now , since the background dissipative medium is not spatially bound the @xmath577 field associated with damped modes will vanish if @xmath133 as explained before . we could therefore be tempted @xcite to eliminate from the start @xmath577 and thus get in the laplace transform language the effective formula : @xmath578\nonumber\\ = -\int d^3\mathbf{x ' } \frac{p^2}{c^2}\mathbf{g}_{\chi}(\mathbf{x},\mathbf{x'},ip)\cdot\overline{\mathbf{p}'}^{(0)}(\mathbf{x'},p ) ] . \label{154bbb}\end{aligned}\ ] ] with the total green dyadic function @xmath579 obeying to eq . [ 152 ] with the total permittivity @xmath566 . it is straightforward to check that @xmath580 satisfies also eq . [ 151 ] so that it is the same green function . + however , removing @xmath577 from the start in eq . [ 15bbb ] would mean that the boundary conditions at the initial time @xmath29 have been obliviated since we should now necessarily have @xmath581 . this corresponds to a very specific boundary condition which is certainly allowed in classical physics ( where we can put @xmath582 ) but which in the quantum formalism means that we break the unitarity of the evolution . to say it differently , it means that in the langevin noise formalism @xcite the photon field @xmath423 is not anymore an independent canonical contribution to the evolution since all electromagnetic fields are induced by the material part . the green formalism presented by gruner and welsch @xcite , and abundantly used since @xcite , represents therefore an alternative theory which rigorously speaking is not equivalent , contrary to the claim in refs . @xcite , to the lagrangian formalism discussed in section ii for the general huttner - barnett model @xcite . our analysis , as already explained in the introduction , agrees with the general studies made in the 1970 s and 1980 s in qed @xcite since one must include with an equal footings both the field and matter fluctuations in a self consistent qed in order to preserve rigorously unitarity and causality . + two issues are important to emphasize here . first , observe that in the limit where the background susceptibility @xmath583 vanishes then the term @xmath584 in general does not cancel at any time , and therefore the coupling to photonic modes can not be omitted even in practice from the evolution at finite time @xmath75 . this is is particularly important in nanophotonics where an incident exiting photon field interact with a localized nano - antenna . it is therefore crucial to analyze further the impact of our findings on the quantum dynamics of polaritons in presence of sources such as quantum fluorescent emitters . this will the subject of a subsequent article . + the second issue concerns the hamiltonian definition in the new formalism . indeed , the definition of the full system hamiltonian @xmath52 was previously given for the homogeneous medium case in section iii g. we showed ( see eq . [ 158o ] ) that @xmath52 is given by @xmath585 where @xmath230 is the material hamiltonian defined in eq . [ 30c ] and which depends only on the free mode operators @xmath156 , @xmath157 . this @xmath586 is the hamiltonian considered by the noise langevin approach and the remaining term ( see eq . [ rema ] ) @xmath587 is an additional constant of motion . this constant proved to be irrelevant for all practical purposes since the only surviving electromagnetic fields ( i.e. if @xmath133 ) are the induced @xmath90 modes which are generated by the fluctuating dipole density @xmath30 ( see however the different remarks concerning time symmetry at the end of section iii g ) . now , for the inhomogeneous problem the complete reasoning leading to eq . [ 158ob ] is still rigorously valid . the main difference being that in general the constant of motion @xmath587 is not irrelevant at all since the @xmath88 electromagnetic modes are not in general vanishing even if @xmath133 . + in order to clarify this point we should now physically interpret the term @xmath436 . we first start with the less relevant term in optics : the longitudinal polariton . indeed , the longitudinal field is here decoupled from the rest and evolves independently using the lagrangian density @xmath588 defined in eq . [ 2bb ] ( this should not be necessarily true if the polaritons are coupled to external sources such as fluorescent emitters ) . we thus get the following hamiltonian @xmath589:.\nonumber\\ \label{2c}\end{aligned}\ ] ] @xmath590 is a constant of motion and can used ( with the hamiltonian formalism ) to deduce the evolution equation ( see eq . [ 8b ] ) and the solution eq . [ 17bb ] . since @xmath590 is a constant of motion we have @xmath591 and from the form of the solution we obtain the equivalent formula @xmath592 . \label{2d}\end{aligned}\ ] ] where we have clearly by definition @xmath593and thus @xmath594 ( with @xmath595 ) . while @xmath596 is a constant of motion it is not irrelevant here since the equivalence of eq . [ 2c ] and eq . [ 2d ] leads to the complete solution eq . [ 17bb ] for @xmath597 . oppositely , taking @xmath598 and omitting @xmath596 would lead to the free solution @xmath599 in contradiction with the dynamical law . this again stresses the importance of keeping all contributions in the evolution and hamiltonian . + in order to analyze the transverse field hamiltonian we should comment further on the difference between the description using the @xmath423 potential used in this work and the most traditional treatment using the * a * potential ( in the coulomb gauge ) . indeed , by analogy with the separation between @xmath475 and @xmath474 modes discussed in section vi a we can using the * a * potential vector representation get a separation between free - space modes @xmath600 and source field @xmath601 . here , we label these modes by an additional prime for reasons which will become clear below . first , the source field contribution @xmath602 is given by @xmath603 and with by definition @xmath604 . importantly we have @xmath605 meaning also @xmath606 . the free - space modes @xmath607 are easily obtained using a plane wave expansion as @xmath608 where @xmath609 . using the @xmath3 potential we therefore get for the free electromagnetic fields : @xmath610 these transverse fields satisfy maxwell s equation in vacuum like the free - fields given by eq . [ 121 ] do as well . however , it should now be clear that this two sets of free - fields given either by eq . [ 140nnn ] or eq . [ 121 ] are not equivalent . to see that we must express the source field @xmath611 . the longitudinal contribution @xmath612 is given by the usual instantaneous coulomb field @xmath613 since there is no other longitudinal contribution this leads to @xmath614 which is eq . [ gourbi ] . as mentioned already this is the usual result . however the most important term here is the transverse source field : @xmath615 . we get for this term @xmath616 which is also written as : @xmath617 equivalently we have in the frequency domain : @xmath618 \nonumber\\ \label{143}\end{aligned}\ ] ] this transverse scattered field vanishes at @xmath29 : @xmath619 and therefore at this initial time it differs by an amount @xmath620 from the scattered field given by eq . we thus get @xmath621 . importantly , by comparing eq . [ 136 ] and eq . [ 144 ] we obtain a relation for the free - space modes in the two representations using either the @xmath423 or @xmath3 potential vectors : @xmath622 this is reminiscent from the relation @xmath623 . it shows that while the two fields @xmath624 and @xmath625 are solutions of the same maxwell s equations in vacuum they are not defined by the same initial conditions . we must therefore be extremely careful when dealing with the modes in order not to get confused with the solutions chosen . we also mention that the scattered magnetic field @xmath626 is given by @xmath627 or equivalently by @xmath628 in the frequency domain this gives : @xmath629 a comparison with the formulas obtained in the subsection vi a shows that @xmath630 differs from @xmath505 but that at time @xmath29 both vanish so that @xmath631 . it implies that @xmath632 so that while @xmath633 differs from @xmath634 for @xmath635 they become equal at the initial time @xmath29 . again , this stresses the difference between the representations based either on @xmath423 or @xmath3 . + now , this description using @xmath3 leads to a clear interpretation of @xmath636 . indeed , at time @xmath29 only the @xmath607 solution survives for the transverse part of the field . importantly , the set of free - space solutions @xmath607 actually depends on lowering and rising operators @xmath637 , @xmath638 defined such that @xmath639=\delta_{\alpha,\beta}\delta_{j , k}$ ] and @xmath640 with @xmath641 . therefore , by a reasoning similar to the one leading to eq . [ 158o ] we deduce @xmath642 we clearly here get a physical interpretation of the remaining term @xmath643 as a energy sum over the transverse photon modes propagating in free space . these free photons are calculated using the @xmath3 potential vector . from eq . [ 145 ] we know that these modes differ in general from those in the @xmath423 potential vector since @xmath644 is not identical to @xmath645 unless the polarization density @xmath646 cancels ( which is the case in vacuum ) . + now , in classical physics the meaning of expansion eq . [ energytransverse ] is clear : it corresponds to a diagonalization of the hamiltonian in term of normal coordinates , i.e. , like for classical mechanics @xcite , and similarly to the huang , fano , hopfield procedure for polaritons @xcite . in qed the problem is different since , as explained in details in ref . @xcite fields like @xmath647 and @xmath648 ( and their hermitian conjugate variables ) do not commute , unlike it is for @xmath649 and @xmath648 . it is thus not possible to find common eigenstates of the @xmath650 operators for photons ( in the usual representation ) and for @xmath651 associated with the material fluctuations . this is not true for the representation using @xmath652 and @xmath651 operators but now the full hamiltonian is not fully diagonalized as seen from eq . [ 158ob ] . only if one neglect the remaining term @xmath436 , like it was done in refs . @xcite , can we diagonalize the hamiltonian . however , then we get the troubles concerning unitarity , causality and time symmetry discussed along this manuscript . the general formalism discussed in this article using the @xmath423 potential provide a natural way for dealing with qed in dispersive and dissipative media . it is based on a canonical quantization procedure generalizing the early work of huttner and barnett @xcite for polaritons in homogeneous media . the method is unambiguous as far as we conserve all terms associated with free photons @xmath653 and material fluctuations @xmath346 for describing the quantum evolution . in particular , in order to preserve the full unitarity and the time symmetry of the coupled system of equations we have to include in the evolution terms associated with fluctuating electromagnetic modes @xmath319 , @xmath320 which have a classical interpretation as polariton eigenmodes and can not in general be omitted if the medium is spatially localized in vacuum . we also discussed alternative representation based on the potential @xmath3 instead of @xmath423 . at the end both representations are clearly equivalent and could be used for generalizing the present theory to other linear media including tensorial anisotropy , magnetic properties , and constitutive equations coupling @xmath654 and @xmath655 ( magneto / electric media ) . moreover , the most important finding of the present article concerns the comparisons between the generalized huttner - barnett approach , advocated here , which involves both photonic and material independent degrees of freedom , and the langevin - noise method proposed initially by gruner and welsch @xcite which involves only the material degrees of freedom associated with fluctuating currents . we showed that rigorously speaking the langevin - noise method is not equivalent to the full hamiltonian qed evolution coupling photonic and material fields . only in the regime where the dissipation of the bulk surrounding medium is non vanishing at spatial infinity could we , i.e. , for all practical purposes , identify the two theories . however , even with such assumptions the langevin noise model is breaking time - symmetry since it considers only decaying modes while the full hamiltonian theory used in our work accepts also growing waves associated with anti - thermodynamic processes . we claim that this is crucial in nanophotonics / plasmonics where quantum emitters , spatially localized , are coupled to photonic and material modes available in the complex environment , e.g. , near nano - antennas in vacuum ( i.e. in a spatial domain where losses are vanishing at infinity ) . since most studies consider the interaction between molecules or quantum - dots and plasmon / polaritons using the langevin noise approach we think that it is urgent to clarify and clean up the problem by analyzing the coupling regime using the full hamiltonian evolution advocated in the present work . finally , we suggest that this work could impact the interpretation and discussion of pure qed effects such as the casimir force or the lamb shift which are strongly impacted by polariton and plasmon modes . all this will be the subject for future works and therefore the present detailed analysis is expected to play an important role in nanophotonics and plasmonics for both the classical and quantum regimes . this work was supported by agence nationale de la recherche ( anr ) , france , through the sinphonie ( anr-12-nano-0019 ) and placore ( anr-13-bs10 - 0007 ) grants . the author gratefully acknowledges several discussions with g. bachelier . the relation @xmath656 admits zeros @xmath100 as postulated in the text . writing @xmath45 one of such zero and @xmath657 the condition eq . [ b1 ] means : @xmath658 from which we deduce after eliminating @xmath659 @xmath660 therefore a necessary but not sufficient condition for having zeros is that if @xmath661 for such a zero then @xmath662 while if @xmath663 then @xmath662 . actually we also see from eq . [ b2 ] that the zero are allowed to be located along the real or imaginary axis of the complex @xmath14 plane if @xmath664 along these axes . this is in general not possible for a large class of permittivity function . consider for example the quite general causal permittivity , i.e. , satisfying the kramers - krnig relation , defined by : @xmath665 with @xmath666 . then we have also @xmath667 clearly , @xmath668 if @xmath669 and @xmath670 in contradiction with the necessary condition for zeros existence mentioned before . this reasoning is valid in one quarter plane but now , if @xmath671 is a zero @xmath672 is also a zero . therefore , the absence of a zero in the quarter plane @xmath669 , @xmath670 implies the absence of zero in the second quarter plane @xmath673 , @xmath670 and therefore eq . [ b1 ] do not admit any zero in the upper half plane for a very usual permittivity like eq . [ b3 ] . actually , the case @xmath674 should be handled separately . we find from eq . [ b4 ] that for such value @xmath664 . this is acceptable in order to have a zero existence in agreement with eq . however , from eq . [ b2 ] we find also that if a zero exists along the axis @xmath674 then we should have as well @xmath675 . this is in contradiction with eq . [ b4 ] which implies @xmath676 . this completes the proof for the permittivity given by eq . + the question concerning the generality of the proof is however still handling . huttner and barnett mentioned the existence of such a proof in the landau and lifschitz text - book @xcite but has no solution in the upper frequency half - plane ( see refs . @xcite).,width=309 ] it is relevant to detail the missing proof here . in order to get the complete result we will use a method used by landau and lifshitz ( see ref . @xcite p. 380 ) . in the complex @xmath14-plane we define @xmath677 . from the properties of @xmath678 we deduce @xmath679 . this implies that @xmath680 is real along the imaginary axis and that @xmath681 and @xmath682 along the real axis . furthermore due to causality we have @xmath683 and therefore @xmath684 if @xmath669 along the real axis . now we consider the closed contour integral ( see fig . 1 ) @xmath685 along @xmath686 made of the real axis and of the semi circle @xmath687 of infinite radius @xmath688 in the upper half plane . however , @xmath689 is a real number and since @xmath680 is not real along the real axis there is no pole along @xmath686 unless @xmath689 is infinite or null . therefore , since @xmath680 is analytical in the upper half plane eq . [ b5 ] gives the numbers of zeros of @xmath690 in this half space . + we then rewrite eq . [ b5 ] as an integral in the complex @xmath691 : @xmath692 where @xmath693 is the image of @xmath686 along the mapping @xmath694 . in particular the origin @xmath695 is mapped on it self while the semi circle of radius @xmath696 is mapped onto the circle of radius @xmath697 . the half real axis @xmath698 corresponding to @xmath351 is mapped onto a complex curve located in the upper half plane of the complex @xmath680-space ( since @xmath699 along this half line ) . similarly , the second half axis @xmath700 is mapped in the lower half plane . as shown on the figure if @xmath701 then the contour integral omits the point @xmath702 and there is no pole involved in the integral which therefore vanishes . we thus deduce that eq . [ b1 ] has no solution in the upper half - plane in the @xmath14 space which is the proof needed . the calculation of @xmath93 defined by the bromwich integral eq . [ 95 ] for @xmath703 : @xmath704 can be handled after closing the contour integral in the lower plane . however , since @xmath389 is not analytical in such lower plane we must include the poles @xmath100 ( all located in the lower plane see appendix a ) , i.e. the residues , in the integral . we use the separation : @xmath705\nonumber\\ \label{96}\end{aligned}\ ] ] and express it as a function of @xmath706 near each poles ( i.e , in the limit @xmath707 ) . we get : @xmath708 from the condition @xmath104 and the equality @xmath709 we then get for @xmath703 after integration in the lower plane eq . [ 98 ] and @xmath106 for @xmath97 ( after integration in the upper plane where no pole are present ) . the value at @xmath108 deserves some careful analysis . indeed , if @xmath108 the integration along the semicircle do not vanish exponentially with it radius @xmath696 and if we choose to integrate in the upper half plane ( where there is no pole ) we get @xmath710 if @xmath688 since @xmath711 in this limit in the upper half plane . therefore we have indeed @xmath712 and the function is continuous at @xmath108 . of course the null value for negative time @xmath713 have no meaning since the laplace transform is only interested in the evolution for positive time . + this leads to the sum rule : @xmath714=0.\label{101}\end{aligned}\]]this leads to the sum rule : @xmath714=0.\label{99}\end{aligned}\ ] ] the free term @xmath110 is defined as @xmath715e^{p(t - t_0)}}{\omega_\alpha^2+(1+\bar{\chi}(p))p^2}\nonumber\\ = u_\alpha(t - t_0)\dot{q}_{\alpha , j}(t_0)+\dot{u}_\alpha(t - t_0)q_{\alpha , j}(t_0)\nonumber\\ \label{102}\end{aligned}\ ] ] with @xmath716 like for @xmath113 we get @xmath717 . the last line of eq . [ 102 ] is therefore justified from the fact that the laplace transform of @xmath718 is @xmath719 . now , the boundary condition at @xmath115 imposes @xmath117 . therefore , from eq . [ 103 ] we deduce the second sum rule : @xmath720=1.\label{104}\end{aligned}\ ] ] the value at @xmath108 is not defined univocally since @xmath718 defined through the bromwich integral of @xmath721 is discontinuous . we point out that considering a direct integration at @xmath108 could lead to contradictions since the integration along @xmath722 do not vanish . if we choose to integrate in the upper half plane ( where there is no pole ) we get @xmath723 if @xmath688 since @xmath711 in this limit in the upper half plane . we would get @xmath724 ( a similar calculation could be done in the lower space including poles and residues and we would obtain once again @xmath725 ) . here we considered carefully the limit to prevent us from such a contradiction . the source field can be written as : @xmath726 . after some algebras we get : @xmath727 where we introduced the green function:@xmath728 computed by contour integration in the complex plane and solution of @xmath729 . of course , along the real axis @xmath730 we get @xmath731 which is the usual green function for an homogenous medium . we can also write this field without introducing @xmath14 by using the green propagator @xmath732 which leads to : @xmath733 we have also @xmath734 which represent the generalization of retarded propagator expansion for a lossy and dispersive medium . the role of causality is here crucial since the modes are always damped when the time is growing in the future direction as expected from pure thermodynamical considerations . this means in particular that @xmath735 tends to vanish exponentially as @xmath75 goes to infinity . importantly , in the vacuum limit ( @xmath126 ) we get naturally @xmath736 and in the limit @xmath407 we obtain the retarded potential @xmath737 however , in the vacuum limit we have also : @xmath738 therefore @xmath739 actually vanishes and we get in this limit @xmath740 as it should be . now , from eq . [ 105 ] and from the field definition we easily get the integral formulas for @xmath741 and @xmath742 : @xmath743 these equations have a clear interpretation in term of generalized hertz potentials . in particular , taking the limit @xmath176 and using the properties of convolutions , together with the fact that @xmath744 , we get @xmath745 with @xmath746 by rewriting @xmath747 in eq . [ cool ] we get after some rearrangements : @xmath748}{p^2(1+\bar{\chi}(p))}\label{137}\end{aligned}\ ] ] which involves the scalar green function defined in eq . [ 104 ] and from @xmath749 @xmath750\nonumber\\+ \mathbf{i}\delta^{3}(\mathbf{x}-\mathbf{x'})\label{138}\end{aligned}\ ] ] these formulas must be taken carefully since they are not actually valid at the source location , i.e. , if @xmath751 due to the bad convergence of the series defining the dyadic green function . after regularization we can obtain the result @xmath752\nonumber\\ + \frac{c^2}{p^2(1+\bar{\chi}(p))}\mathbf{l}\delta^{3}(\mathbf{x}-\mathbf{x'})\label{139}\end{aligned}\ ] ] and @xmath753\label{140}\end{aligned}\ ] ] with @xmath754 a dyadic term depending on the way we define the principal value @xcite : @xmath755 for a small exclusion spherical volume surrounding the point @xmath756 we get @xmath757 , i.e. , the depolarization field predicted by the clausius - mosotti formula @xcite . + in the particular case @xmath477 we write @xmath758 and similarly for other green functions . we also consider the time evolution which in vacuum relies on the propagators @xmath759 explicit calculations lead to : @xmath760 and similarly for the transverse part of @xmath761 : @xmath762 while for the longitudinal part we get : @xmath763 we deduce automatically the boundary conditions @xmath764 . we also obtain @xmath765 and @xmath766 from which we obtain the boundary condition : @xmath767 . we thus obtain : @xmath768 finally , from eq . [ 139 ] we find explicitly for the time dependent @xmath769 field : @xmath770.\label{a16}\end{aligned}\ ] ] from eq . [ b ] we deduce in the hopfield model @xmath771 this leads to the solution @xmath772 and therefore to @xmath773 where the permittivity is given by the lossless lorentz - drude formula @xmath774 . for the transverse fields we expand the different fields as @xmath775 with @xmath776 and @xmath777 . now , we write @xmath294 with @xmath295 a transverse vector field . we thus have @xmath778 with @xmath779 . we thus get the equation @xmath780 near the singularities @xmath781 we get : @xmath782\widetilde{e}_{\alpha , j}(\omega)=\omega_0 ^ 2\gamma_{\alpha , j}\delta(\omega-\omega_0)\end{aligned}\ ] ] and therefore supposing the regularity ( as for the longitudinal case ) we have @xmath783 . the secular equation @xmath784\widetilde{e}_{\alpha , j,\pm}(\omega)=0 $ ] associated with the transverse modes can be easily solved and this indeed leads to @xmath785 with @xmath786 with @xmath302 an amplitude coefficient for the transverse polariton mode . importantly we again get from the regularity condition @xmath787 and thus @xmath788 like for the longitudinal mode . this implies @xmath789 and from eq . [ reeu ] we get @xmath790 . at the end of the day we obtain the following fields amplitudes @xmath791 and @xmath792 ( using definitions similar to eq . [ defi ] ) . these define the hopfield transformation between the old variables @xmath793 , @xmath794 , @xmath795 , @xmath796 and the new polaritonic variables representing the normal coordinates of the problem @xmath302 and @xmath797 . up to a normalization this is equivalent to the work by hopfield . we start with the amplitude for the transverse polariton field @xmath798 where @xmath366 is a frequency window centered on the polariton pulsation @xmath363:=\omega'_{\alpha , m}$ ] . this field is equivalently written as @xmath799 where @xmath800 is a window function such as @xmath801 if @xmath14 belongs to the interval @xmath366 and @xmath802 otherwise . from the commuting properties of @xmath162 ( see eqs . [ 33 ] and [ commuting ] ) we deduce the commutator : @xmath370=\frac{\hbar}{\pi}\delta_{\alpha,\beta}\delta_{j , l}\nonumber\\ \cdot\int_0^{+\infty } \frac{d\omega\omega^4\tilde{\varepsilon}''(\omega)}{|\omega_\alpha^2-\tilde{\varepsilon}(\omega)\omega^2|^2 } f_{\alpha , m}(\omega)f_{\beta , n}(\omega)\end{aligned}\ ] ] with @xmath803 . now consider the integral : @xmath804 since for weak losses the integrand is extremely peaked on the value @xmath390 we can write @xmath805 as @xmath806 we use the approximation @xmath807 which is valid near the pole where the conditions @xmath808 approximately holds for transverse polaritons . we thus get @xmath809 with @xmath810 and @xmath811 . and where we used the integral @xmath812 which is easily calculated in the complex plane . from this we finally obtain the commutator of eq . [ window ] . we point out that the result does not explicitly depends on the extension of the frequency windows @xmath366 if losses and dispersion are weak enough to have @xmath813 . + for the longitudinal polariton field we have a similar calculation . starting with the definition : @xmath814 we can calculate the commutator @xmath815 $ ] . we have @xmath401=\frac{\hbar}{\pi}\delta_{\alpha,\beta}\nonumber\\ \cdot \int_0^{+\infty } d\omega\frac{\tilde{\varepsilon}''(\omega)}{|\tilde{\varepsilon}(\omega)|^2 } f_{\alpha , m}(\omega)f_{\beta , n}(\omega)\end{aligned}\ ] ] with again @xmath803 . we have to evaluate the integral @xmath816 which like for the transverse modes in the limit of weak losses and dispersion leads after straightforward calculations to @xmath817from this we deduce the commutator given in eq . [ windowlong ] . jauch and k.m . watson , phys . rev . * 74 * , 950 ( 1948 ) . l. knll , w. vogel , d .- welsch , phys . a * 36 * , 63803 ( 1987 ) . glauber , m. lewenstein , phys . a * 43 * , 467 ( 1991 ) . m. wubs , l.g . suttorp , a. lagendijk , phys . a * 68 * , 013822 ( 2003 ) . p. d. drummond , phys . a * 42 * , 6845 ( 1990 ) . constantinou , o. al - dossary , m. babiker , j. phys . : condens . matter * 5 * , 5581 ( 1993 ) . milonni , j. mod . phys . * 42 * , 1991 ( 1995 ) . o. al - dossary , m. babiker , n. enfati , phys rev . a * 54 * , 2419 ( 1996 ) . j.c . garrison , r.y . chiao , phys . a 70 , 053826 ( 2004 ) . jeffers , n. imoto , r. loudon , phys . a. * 47 * , 3346 ( 1993 ) . s. barnett , j. jeffers , a. gatti , r. loudon , phys . rev . a. * 57 * , 2134 ( 1998 ) . c. genet , a. lambrecht , s. raynaud , phys a. * 67 * , 043811 ( 2003 ) . m. s. tame , c. lee , j. lee , d. ballester , m. paternostro , a. v. zayats , m. s. kim , phys . * 101 * , 190504 ( 2008 ) . d. ballester , m. s. tame , c. lee , j. lee , m. s. kim , phys . rev . a. * 79 * , 053845 ( 2009 ) . d. ballester , m. s. tame , m. s. kim , phys . a. * 82 * , 012325 ( 2010 ) . b. huttner , j.j . baumberg , s. m. barnett , europhys . lett * 16 * , 177 ( 1991 ) . b. huttner , s. m. barnett , phys . a * 46 * , 4306 ( 1992 ) . b. huttner , s. m. barnett , europhys . lett * 18 * , 487 ( 1992 ) . b. huttner , s. m. barnett , r. loudon , phys . lett . * 68 * , 3698 ( 1992 ) . r. matloob , r. loudon , s. m. barnett , j. jeffers , phys . a * 52 * , 4823 ( 1995 ) . r. matloob , r. loudon , phys . a * 53 * , 4567 ( 1996 ) . s. m. barnett , the quantum optics of dielectrics , in quantum fluctuations , lecture 3 , eds . s. reynaud e. giacobino and j. zinn - justin ( elsevier , amsterdam , 1997 ) . u. fano , phys . rev . * 103 * , 1202 ( 1956 ) . j. j. hopfield , phys . rev.*112 * , 1555 ( 1958 ) . k. huang , proc . a * 208 * , 352 ( 1951 ) . m. wubs , l.g . suttorp , phys . a * 63 * , 043809 ( 2001 ) . suttorp , m. wubs , phys . a * 70 * , 013816 ( 2004 ) . l. g. suttorp a. j. van wonderen , europhys . lett * 67 * , 766 ( 2004 ) . l. g. suttorp , j. phys . a : math . theor . * 40 * , 3697 ( 2007 ) . n. a. r. bhat , j. e. sipe , phys . a * 73 * , 063808 ( 2006 ) . a. c. judge , m. j. steel , j. e. sipe , c. m. de sterke , phys . a * 87 * , 033824 ( 2013 ) . t. g. philbin , new j. phys . * 12 * , 123008 ( 2010 ) . t. gruner , d .- welsch , phys . a * 51 * , 3246 ( 1995 ) . t. gruner , d .- welsch , phys . rev . a * 53 * , 1818 ( 1996 ) . m. s. yeung , t. k. gustafson , phys . a * 54 * , 5227 ( 1996 ) . c. cohen - tannoudji , j. dupont - roc , and g. grynberg , atom - photon interactions : basic processes and applications ( john wiley , new york , 1992 ) . c. girard and a. dereux , report on progress in physics * 59 * , 657 ( 1996 ) . l. novotny , and b. hecht , principles of nano - optics , ( cambridge press , london , 2006 ) . e. m. lifshitz , zh . * 29 * , 94 ( 1955 ) [ sov . jetp 2 , 73 ( 1956 ) ] . v. l. ginzburg , theoretical physics and astrophysics ( pergamon , oxford , ny , 1979 ) . s. m. rytov , theory of electrical fluctuations and thermal radiation ( publishing house , academy of sciences , ussr , 1953 ) . h. b. callen and t. a. welton , phys . rev . * 83 * , 34 ( 1951 ) . w. milonni , the quantum vacuum : an introduction to quantum electrodynamics ( academic , san diego , ca , 1994 ) . f. s. s. rosa , d. a. r. davit , p. w. milonni , phys rev . a 81 , 033812 ( 2010 ) . g. s. agarwal , phys . a * 11 * , 230 ( 1975 ) . j. m. wylie , j.e . sipe , phys . a * 30 * , 1185 ( 1984 ) . r. carminati , j. j. greffet , phys . . lett . * 82 * , 1160 ( 1999 ) . j. p. mulet , k. joulain , r. carminati , , j.j . greffet , appl . 78 * , 2931 ( 2001 ) . e. rousseau , a. siria , g. jourdan , nature phot . 3 , 514 , ( 2009 ) . c. henkel , k. joulain , j. p. mulet , j. j. greffet , j. opt . . opt . * 4 * , s109 ( 2002 ) . s. scheel , l. knll , d .- welsch , phys . a * 58 * , 700 ( 1998 ) . h. t. dung , l. knll , d .- welsch , phys . a * 57 * , 3931 ( 1998 ) . h. t. dung , l. knll , d .- welsch , phys . a * 62 * , 053804 ( 2000 ) . l. knll , s. scheel , d .- welsch , qed in dispersing and absorbing media , in coherence and statistics of photons and atoms , chap . 1 , ed . j. perina ( wiley , new - york , 2001 ) . r. matloob , phys . a * 60 * , 50 ( 1999 ) . r. matloob , phys . a * 69 * , 052110 ( 2004 ) . r. fermani , s. scheel , p. l. knight , phys . a * 73 * , 032902 ( 2006 ) . c. raabe , s. scheel , d .- welsch , phys . a * 75 * , 053813 ( 2007 ) . m. amooshahi , f. kheirandish , j. phys . a : math . theor . * 41 * , 275402 ( 2008 ) . s. scheel , s.y . buhmann , acta phys . slovaca * 58 * , 675 ( 2008 ) . d. dzotjan , a. s. sorensen , m. fleschhauer , phys . rev . b * 82 * , 075427 ( 2010 ) . d. martin - cano , a. gonzalez - tudela , l. martin - moreno , f. j. garcia - vidal , c. tejedor , e. moreno , phys . b * 84 * , 235306 ( 2011 ) . t. hummer , f.j . garcia - vidal , l. martin . moreno , d. zueco , phys . b * 87 * , 115419 ( 2013 ) . x. w. chen , v. sandoghdar , m. agio , phys . lett . * 110 * , 153605 ( 2013 ) . a. delga , j. feist , j. bravo - abad , f. j. garcia vidal , j. opt . 16 , 114018 ( 204 ) . j. hakami , l. wang , m. s. zubairy , phys . a * 89 * , 053835 ( 2014 ) . choquette , k. p. marzlin , phys . a * 85 * , 063841 ( 2012 ) . a. l. grimsmo , a. h. vaskinn , p. k. rekdal , b. s. k. skagerstam , phys . a * 87 * , 022101 ( 2013 ) . b. rousseaux , d. dzsotjan , g. colas des francs , h. r. jauslin , c. couteau , s. guerin , phys . rev . b * 93 * , 045422 ( 2016 ) . i. r. senitzky , phys . lett . * 31 * , 955 ( 1973 ) . j. r. ackerhalt , p. l. knight , j. h. eberly , phys . lett . * 30 * , 456 ( 1973 ) . p. w. milonni , j. r. ackerhalt , w. a.smith , phys . 31 * , 958 ( 1973 ) . j. dalibard , j. dupont - roc , c. cohen - tannoudji , j. physique * 43 * , 1617 ( 1982 ) . milonni , phys . a * 82 * , 225 ( 1981 ) . a. drezet , phys . a * 94 * , 053826 ( 2016 ) . c. cohen - tannoudji , j. dupont - roc , and g. grynberg , photons and atoms : an introduction to quantum electrodynamics ( john wiley , new york , 1989 ) . e. power , s. zienau , phi . a251 , 427 ( 1959 ) . r. zwanzig , nonequilibrium statistical mechanics ( oxford university press , oxford , 2001 ) . o. d. stefano , s. savasta , r. girlanda , phys . rev . a * 61 * , 023803 ( 2000 ) . s. savasta , o. d. stefano , r. girlanda , phys . a * 65 * , 043801 ( 2002 ) . m. khanbekyan , l. kn'oll , d .- welsch , phys . a * 67 * , 063812 ( 2003 ) . m. khanbekyan , l. kn'oll , d .- welsch , a. a. semenov , w. vogel , phys . a * 72 * , 053813 ( 2005 ) . j. d. jackson , classical electrodynamics 3rd . ( j. wiley and sons , new york , 1999 ) . j. a. wheeler , r. p. feynman , rev . * 21 * , 425 ( 1949 ) p. c. w. davies , the physics of time asymmetry ( the university of california press , berkeley , 1974 ) . d. zeh , the physical basis of the direction of time ( springer , berlin - heldeberg , 2007 ) . h. goldstein , c. p. poole jr . , j. l. safko , classical mechanics 3 rd . ( addison wesley , 2001 ) . for the lorentz drude model we have the conductivity @xmath825 which equals @xmath826 defined in section ii for @xmath827 . now , in the huttner barnet model we introduce therefore a singular coefficient @xmath828 in the definition eq . [ 5 ] of the dipole density . in order to have finite quantity and to omit the use of the square root of a dirac function we define @xmath829 in order to have @xmath830 . the mechanical lagrangian ( see eq . [ 2 ] ) becomes @xmath831 in agreement with hopfield . this leads to the mechanical and electromagnetic evolution equations discussed in the main text . more precisely we have near the singularity @xmath781 the condition @xmath832 . if we suppose @xmath278 to be regular we get the result discussed in the text . if @xmath278 is singular then @xmath833 would be even more singular and this would contradict the equation . therefore regularity at @xmath282 must be imposed . s. t. ho , p. kumar , j. opt . b * 10 * , 1620 ( 1993 ) . f. tassone , f. bassani , l. c. andreani , il nuovo cimento d * 12 * , 1673 ( 1990 ) . d. gerace , l. c. andreani , phys . b * 75 * , 235325 ( 2007 ) . g. juzeliunas , phys . a * 53 * , 3543 ( 1996 ) . y. todorov , phys . b * 89 * , 075115 ( 2014 ) . y. todorov , phys . b * 91 * , 125409 ( 2015 ) . m.d . tokman , m. a. erukhimova , v.v . vdovin , ann . phys * 360 * , 571 ( 2015 ) . l. brillouin , wave propagation and group velocity ( academic press , new york,1960 ) j. yang , m. perrin , p. lalanne , phys . rev . x * 5 * , 021008 ( 2015 ) . a. archambault , f. marquier , j. j. greffet , phys . b * 82 * , 035411 ( 2010 ) . Abstract: